W885® >^c; jT! 'V it H. k^ $^ m&- vC LIFE, GENIUS ACHIEVEMENT BURNS LIFE, GENIUS ACHIEVEMENT BY W. R HENLEY Reprinted from "The Centenary Burns' EDINBURGH T. C. AND E. C. JACK LONDON : WHITTAKER AND CO 1898 A33.1 HAS' TO T. F. HENDERSON IN MEMORY OP MUCH DIFFICULT YET SATISFYING WORK HIS FELLOW IN BURNS W. E. H. Muswell Hill, Sth July 1897. ROBERT BURNS (1759-1796) In 1759 the Kirk of Scotland, though a less potent and offensive tyranny than it had been in the good old times, was still a tyranny, and was still offensive and still potent enough to make life miserable, to warp the characters of men and women, and to turn the tempers and affections of many from the kindly, natural way. True it is that Hutcheson (1694-1746) had for some years taught, and taught with such authority as an University chair can give, a set of doctrines in absolute antagonism with the prin- ciples on which the Kirk of Scotland's rule was based, and with the ambitions which the majority in the Kirk of Scotland held in view. But these doctrines, sane and invigorating as they were, had not reached the general ; and in all departments of life among the general the Kirk of Scotland was a paramount influence, and, despite the intrusion of some generous intelligences, was largely occupied with the work of narrowing the minds, perverting the instincts, and constraining the spiritual and social liberties of its subjects. In 1759, however, there was secreted the certainty of a revulsion against its ascendency ; for that year saw the birth of the most popular poet, and the most anti-clerical withal, that Scotland ever 234 ROBERT BURNS bred. He came of the people on both sides ; he had a high courage, a proud heart, a daring mind, a matchless gift of speech, an abundance of humour and wit and fire ; he was a poet in whom were quint- essentialised the elements of the Vernacular Genius, in whose work the effects and the traditions of the Vernacular School, which had struggled back into being in the Kirk's despite, were repeated with sur- passing brilliancy ; and in the matter of the Kirk he did for the people a piece of service equal and similar to that which was done on other lines and in other spheres by Hutcheson and Hume and Adam Smith. He was apostle and avenger as well as maker. He did more than give Scotland songs to sing and rhymes to read : he showed that laughter and the joy of life need be no crimes, and that freedom of thought and sentiment and action is within the reach of him that will stretch forth his hand to take it. He pushed his demonstration to extremes; often his teaching has been grossly misread and misapprehended ; no doubt, too, he died of his effort — and himself. But most men do as they must — not as they will. It was Burns's destiny, as it was Byron's in his turn, to be ' the passionate and dauntless soldier of a forlorn hope ' ; and if he fell in mid-assault, he found, despite the circumstances of his passing, the best death man can find. He had faults and failings not a few. But he was ever a leader among men ; and if the manner of his leading were not seldom reckless, and he did some mischief, and gave the Fool a great deal of what passes for good Scripture for his folly, it will be found in the long-run that he led for truth — ROBERT BURNS 235 the truth which ' maketh free ' ; so that the Scotland he loved so well, and took such pride in honouring, could scarce have been the Scotland she is, had he not been. His father, William Burness (or Burnes), and his mother, Agnes Brown, came both of yeoman stock: native the one to Kincardineshne, the other to Ayr- shire. William Burness began life as a gardener, and was plying his trade in the service of one Fergusson, the then Provost of Ayr, when, with a view to setting up for himself, he took a lease of seven acres in the parish of Alloway, with his own hands built a two- roomed clay cottage — (still standing, but in use as a Burns Museum), — and in the December of 1757 married Agnes Brown, his junior by eleven years. She was red-haired, dark-eyed, square-browed, well- made, and quick-tempered. He was swarthy and thin ; a man of strong sense, a very serious mind, the most vigilant affections, 1 and a piety not even the Calvinism in which he had been reared could ever make brooding and inhumane. And in the clay cottage to which he had taken his new-mai-ried wife, Robert, the first of seven children, was born to them on the 25th January 1759- 1 In times of storm, he would seek out and stay with his daughter, where she was herding in the fields, because he knew that she was afraid of lightning ; or, when it was fair, to teach her the names of plants and flowers. He wrote a little theological treatise for his children's guidance, too, and was, it is plain, an exemplary father, and so complete a husband that there is record of but a single unpleasantness between him and Agues his wife. 236 ROBERT BURNS The Scots peasant lived hard, toiled incessantly, and fed so cheaply that even on high days and holidays his diet (as set forth in The Blithesome Bridal) consisted largely in preparations of meal and vegetables and what is technically known as ' offal.' But the Scots peasant was a creature of the Kirk ; the noblest ambition of Knox x was an active in- fluence in the Kirk ; and the Parish Schools enabled the Kirk to provide its creatures with such teach- ing as it deemed desirable. William Burness was ' a very poor man ' (R. B.). But he had the right tradition ; he was a thinker and an observer ; he read whatever he could get to read ; he wrote English formally but with clarity ; 2 and he did the very best he could for his children in the matter of education. Robert went to school at 1 The Reformer had a vast deal more in common with Burns than with the ' sour John Knox ' of Browning's ridiculous verses. He was the man of a crisis, and a desperate one ; and he played his part in it like the stark and fearless opposite that he was. But he was a humourist, he loved his glass of wine, he abounded in humanity and intelligence, he married two wives, he was as well beloved as he was extremely hated and feared. He could not foresee what the collective stupidity of posterity would make of his teaching and example, nor how the theocracy at whose establishment he aimed would presently assert itself as largely a system of parochial inquisitions. The minister's man who had looked through his keyhole would have got short shrift from h vm : and in the Eighteenth Century he had as certainly stood with Bums against the Kirk of Scotland, as represented by Auld and Russell and the like, as in the Sixteenth he stood with Moray and the nobles against the Church of Rome, as figured in David Beaton and the 'twa infernal monstris, Pride and Avarice.' 2 See the aforesaid treatise : — ' A Manual of Religious Belief, in a Dialogue between Father and Son, compiled by "William Burnes, fanner at Mount Oliphant, and transcribed, with grammatical cor- rections, by John Murdoch, teacher.' ROBERT BURNS 237 six; 1 and in the May of the same year (1765) a lad of eighteen, one John Murdoch, was * engaged by Mr. Burness and four of his neighbours to teach, and accordingly began to teach, the little school at Alloway ' : his ' five employers ' undertaking to board him 'by turns, and to make up a certain salary at the end of the year,' in the event of his ' quarterly payments ' not amounting to a specified sum. He was an intelligent pedagogue — (he had William Burness behind him) — especially in the matter of grammar and rhetoric ; he trained his scholars to a full sense of the meaning and the value of words; he even made them 'turn verse into its natural prose order/ and ' substitute synony- mous expressions for poetical words and . . . supply all the ellipses.' 2 One of his school-books was the Bible, another Masson's Collection of Prose and Verse, excerpted from Addison 3 and Steele and Dryden, 1 ' I was a good deal noted at these years,' says the Letter to Moore, ' for a retentive memory, a stubborn, sturdy something in my disposition, and an enthusiastic idiot-piety. ... In my infant and boyish days, too, I owed much to an old maid of my mother's, remarkable for her ignorance, credulity, and superstition,' who had, ' I suppose, the largest collection in the county of tales and songs concerning devils, ghosts, fairies, brownies, witches, war- locks, spunkies, kelpies, elf -candles, death-lights, wraiths, appari- tions, cantraips, enchanted towers, giants, dragons, and other trumpery. This cultivated the latent seeds of Poesy,' etc. 2 As Robert Louis Stevenson has remarked (Some Aspects of Robert Burns) :— ' "We are surprised at the prose style of Robert ; that of Gilbert need surprise us no less.' 3 ' The earliest thing of composition I recollect taking pleasure in, was The Vision of Mirza, and a hymn of Addison's begin- ning, "How are thy servants blessed, O Lord" ' (R. B., Letter to Moore). ' The first two books,' he adds, 'I ever read in private, and which gave me more pleasure than any two books I ever read again, were the Life of Hannibal and the History of Sir William 238 ROBERT BURNS from Thomson and Shenstone, Mallet and Henry Mackenzie, with Gray's Elegy, scraps from Hume and Robertson, and scenes from Romeo and Juliet, Othello, and Hamlet. And one effect of his method was that Robert, according to himself, ' was abso- lutely a critic in substantives, verbs, and participles,' and, according to Gilbert, ' soon became remarkable for the fluency and correctness of his expression, and read the few books that came in his way with much pleasure and improvement.' It is very char- acteristic of Murdoch that when, his school beino- broken up, he came to take leave of William Burness at Mount Oliphant, ' he brought us,' Gilbert says, c a present and memorial of him, a small English grammar and the tragedy of Titus Andronicus,' and that ' by way of passing the evening ' he ' began to read the play aloud.' Not less characteristic of all concerned was the effect of his reading. His hearers melted into tears at the tale of Lavinia's woes, and, ' in an agony of distress,' implored him to read no more. Ever sensible and practical, William Burness remarked that, as nobody wanted to hear the play, Murdoch need not leave it. Robert, ever a senti- mentalist and ever an indifferent Shakespearean, 1 Wallace. Hannibal gave my young ideas such a turn that I used to strut in raptures up and down after the recruiting-drum and bag-pipe, and wish myself tall enough that I might be a soldier ; while the story of Wallace poured a Scottish prejudice in my veins which will boil along there (sic) till the floodgates of life shut in eternal rest.' 1 If we may judge him from his extant work. Cf. the absurd line : — ' Here Douglas forms wild Shakespeare into plan.' He cribs but once from Shakespeare, and the happiest among his ROBERT BURNS 239 — « Robert replied that, if it was left, he would burn it.' And Murdoch, ever the literary guide, philo- sopher, and friend, was so much affected by his pupil's 'sensibility/ that 'he left The School for Love (translated, I think, from the French) ' in Shakespeare's place. 1 At this time Bui*ns had but some two and a half years of Murdoch. William Burness liked and be- lieved in the young fellow ; for when, still urged by the desire to better his children's chance, he turned from gardening to cultivation on a larger scale, and took, at a .£40 rental, the farm of Mount Oliphant, his two sons went on with Murdoch at Alloway, some two miles off. The school once broken up, however, Robert and his brother fell few quotations is prefixed to one of the most felicitous — and therefore the least publishable — of his tributes to the Light-heeled Muse. 'Sing me a bawdy song,' he says with Sir John Falstaff, 'to make us merry.' And he adds this note, in which he is Shakespearean once again : — 'There is — there must be some truth in original sin. My violent propensity to b — dy convinces me of it. Lack a day ! If that species of composition be the special sin never-to-be-forgotten in this world nor in that which is to come, then I am the most offending soul alive. Mair for token, ' etc. (R. B. to Cleghorn, 25th October 1793). 1 There is no trace of any School for Love. It is therefore probable that what Gilbert meant was The School for Lovers : 'A Comedy. As it is acted at the Theatre Royal in Drury Lane. By William Whitehead, Esq. ; Poet Laureat. London : Printed for R. and J. Dodsley in Pall-Mall ; and Sold by J. Hinxman, in Pater-noster-row. mdcclxji.' The first sentence of the author's Advertisement runs thus: — 'The following Comedy is formed on a plan of Monsieur do Fontenelle's, never intended for the stage, and printed in the eighth volume of his works, under the title of Le Testament.' 1 The names of the chief 'persons represented' are Sir John Dorilant, Model}', Belmour, Lady Beverley, Cselia, and Araminta : an unlikely lot, one would say, for an Ayrshire farmstead, even though it sheltered the youthful Burns. 240 ROBERT BURNS into their father's hands, and, for divers reasons, Gilbert says, 'we rarely saw any body but the members of our own family,' so that f my father was for some time the only companion we had.' It will scarce be argued now that this sole com- panionship was wholly good for a couple of lively boys ; but it is beyond question that it was rather good than bad. For, 'he conversed on all subjects with us familiarly, as if we had been men,' and, further, ' was at great pains, as we accompanied him in the labours of the farm, to lead the conversation to such subjects as might tend to increase our know- ledge or confirm our virtuous habits.' Also, he got his charges books — a Geographical Grammar, a Physico and Astro-Theology, Stackhouse's History of the Bible, Ray's Wisdom of God in the Creation ; and these books Robert read ' with an avidity and in- dustry scarcely to be equalled.' 1 None, says Gilbert, ' was so voluminous as to slacken his in- dustry or so antiquated as to damp his research ' : with the result that he wasn't very far on in his 1 Robert's list {Letter to Moore) includes Guthrie and Salmon's Geographical Grammar ; The Spectator ; Pope ; ' some plays of Shakespear ' (acting editions ? or odd volumes ?) ; ' Tull and Dickson on Agriculture'; The Pantheon; Locke On the Human Understanding; Stackhouse; with 'Justice's British Gardener, Boyle's Lectures, Allan Ramsay's Works, Dr. Taylor's Scripture Doctrine of Original Sin, A Select Collection of English Songs, and Harvey's Meditations.' Later he knew Thomson, Shenstone, Beattie, Goldsmith, Gray, Fergusson, Spenser even: with The Tea- Table Miscellany and many another song-book, Adam Smith's Theory of the Moral Sentiments, Reid's Inquiry into the Human Mind, Bunyan, Boston (The Fourfold State), Shake- speare, John Brown's Self -Interpreting Bible, and The Wealth of Nations, which last he is found reading (at Ellisland) with a sense of wonder that so much wit should be contained between ROBERT BURNS 241 'teens ere he had ' a competent knowledge of ancient history/ with e something of geography, astronomy and natural history.' Then, owing to the mistake of an uncle, who went to Ayr to buy a Ready Reckoner or Tradesman s Sure Guide, together with a Complete Letter-Writer, but came back with 'a collection of letters by the most eminent writers,' he was moved by ' a strong desire to excel in letter-writing.' At thirteen or fourteen he was sent ( f week about ' with Gilbert) to Dalrymple Parish School to better his handwriting ; ' about this time ' he fell in with Pamela, Fielding, Hume, Robertson, and the best of Smollett ; and 'about this time ' Murdoch set up as a schoolmaster in Ayr, and 'sent us Pope's Works and some other poetry, the first that we had an opportunity of reading, excepting what is contained in the English Collection and in the volume of the Edinburgh Magazine for 1772.' l The summer after the boards of a single book. One favourite novel was Tristram Shandy ; another, the once renowned, now utterly forgotten Man of Feeling. At Ellisland, again, he is found ordering the works of divers dramatists — as Jonson, "Wycherley, Moliere — with a view to reading and writing for the stage. But you find no trace of them in his work ; nor is there any evidence to show that he could ever have written a decent play, though there is plenty of proof that he could not. No doubt, The Jolly Beggars will be quoted against me here. But the essential interests of that masterpiece are character and description. Now, there go many more things to the making of a play than character, while, as for description, the less a play contains of that the better for the play. 1 The English Collection I take to be Masson's aforesaid. At all events I can find no other. So far as verse is concerned, another exception was found in ' those Excellent new Songs that are hawked about the country in baskets or spread on stalls in the streets' (G. B.). They were probably as interesting to Robert as Pope's Works or the poetry in The Edinburgh Magazine. At VOL. IV. Q 242 ROBERT BURNS the writing-lessons at Dalrymple, Robert spent three weeks with Murdoch at Ayr, one over the English Grammar, the others over the rudiments of French. The latter language he was presently able to read, 1 for the reason that Murdoch would go over to Mount Oliphant on half-holidays, partly for Robert's sake and partly for the pleasure of talking with Robert's father. Thus was Robert schooled ; and 'tis plain that in one, and that an essential particular, he and his brother were ex- ceptionally fortunate in their father and in the means he took to train them. 2 In another respect — one of eminent importance — their luck was nothing like so good. Mount Oliphant was made up of 'the poorest land in Ayrshire'; William Burness had started it on a borrowed hundred ; he was soon in straits ; only by un- remitting diligence and the strictest economy could he hope to make ends meet ; and the burden of hard work lay heavy on the whole family — heavier, as I think, on the growing lads than on any rate, his first essays in song were imitated from them, and he had the trick of them, when he listed, all his life long. 1 Currie saw his Moliere at Dumfries. There is no question but he would have got on excellent well with Argan and Jourdain and Pourceaugnac ; but could he have found much to interest him in Arnolphe and Agnes, in Philinte and Alceste and Celimene ? I doubt it. On the other hand, he would certainly have loved the flon-flons which Colle wrote for the Regent's private theatre ; and I have always regretted that he read (1789) to no better purpose the La Fontaine of the Contcs : a Scots parallel to which he was exactly fitted to achieve. 2 Eobert mastered, besides, the first six books of Euclid, and even dabbled a little in Latin now and then : reverting to his 'Rudiments' (says Gilbert) when he was crossed in love, or bad tiffed with his sweetheart. ROBERT BURNS 243 the made man and woman. ' For several years,' says Gilbert, ' butcher's meat was a stranger to the house.' Robert was his father's chief hand at fifteen — ' for we kept no hired servant ' — and could after- wards describe his life at this time as a combination of ' the cheerless gloom of a hermit with the un- ceasing toil of a galley-slave.' The mental wear was not less than the physical strain: for William Burness grew old and broken, and his family was seven strong, and of money there was as little as there seemed of hope. The wonder is, not that Robert afterwards broke out but, that Robert did not then break down : that he escaped with a lifelong tendency to vapours and melancholia, and at the time of trial itself with that 'dull headache' of an evening, which 'at a future period . . . was exchanged,' says Gilbert, ' for a pal- pitation of the heart and a threatening of fainting and suffocation in his bed in the night-time.' William Burness is indeed a pathetic figure ; but to me the Robert of Mount Oliphant is a figure more pathetic still. Acquired or not, stoicism was habitual with the father. With the son it was not so much as acquired; for in that son was latent a world of appetites and forces and potentialities the reverse of stoical. And, even had this not been : if Robert hadn't proved a man of genius, with the tem- perament which genius sometimes entails : he must still have been the worse for the experience. He lived in circumstances of unwonted harshness and bitterness for a lad of his degree; with a long misery of anticipation, he must endure a quite un- natural strain on forming muscle and on nerves and a brain yet immature; he had perforce to face the 244 ROBERT BURNS necessity of diverting an absolute example of the artistic temperament to laborious and squalid ends, and to assist in the repression of all those natural instincts — of sport and reverie and companionship — the fostering of which is for most boys, have they genius or have they not, an essential process of development ; and the experience left him with stooping shoulders and a heavy gait, an ineradicable streak of sentimentalism, what he himself calls 'the horrors of a diseased nervous system,' and that very practical exultation in the joie de vivre, once it was known, which, while it is brilliantly expressed in much published and unpublished verse and prose, is nowhere, perhaps, so naively signified as in a pleasant parenthesis addressed, years after Mount Oliphant, to the highly respectable Thom- son : — ' Nothing (since a Highland wench in the Cowgate once bore me three bastards at a birth) has surprised me more than,' etc. The rest is not to my purpose : which is to argue that, given Robert Burns and the apprenticeship at Mount Oliphant, a violent reaction was inevitable, and that one's admiration for him is largely increased by the re- flection that it came no sooner than it did. William Burness knew that it must come ; for, as he lay dying, he confessed that it troubled him to think of Robert's future. This, to be sure, was not at Mount Oliphant : when Robert had done no worse than insist on going to a dancing-school : but years after, at Lochlie, when Robert had begun to assert himself. True it is that at Kirkoswald — a smuggling village, whither he went, at seventeen, to study mensura- tion, 'dialling,' and the like — he had learned, he says, ROBERT BURNS 246 'to look unconcernedly on a large tavern bill and mix without fear in a drunken squabble.' True it is, too, that at Lochlie the visible reaction had set in. But, so far as is known, that reaction was merely formal ; and one may safely conjecture that, as boys are not in the habit of telling their fathers everything, William Burness knew little or nothing of those gallant hours at Kirkoswald. For all this, though, he seems to have discerned, however dimly and vaguely, some features of the prodigious creature he had helped into the world ; and that he should not have discerned them till thus late is of itself enough to show how stern and how effectual a discipline Mount Oliphant had proved. 11 The Mount Oliphant period lasted some twelve years, and was at its hardest for some time ere it reached its term. 'About 1775 my father's gener- ous master died,' l says Robert ; and ' to clench the curse we fell into the hands of a factor, who sat for the picture 2 I have drawn of one in my tale of "Twa Dogs." . . . My father's spirit was soon irritated, but not easily broken. There was a free- 1 This was that Fergusson (of Ayr) in whose service "William Burness had been at the time of his marriage with Agnes Brown, and (apparently) for some years after it — in fact, till he took on Mount Oliphant. This he did on a hundred pounds borrowed from his old employer ; and one may conjecture that the legal proceedings which Robert thus resented were entailed upon Fergusson's agents by the work of winding up the estate. 2 ' Sat for the picture I have drawn of one ' is precise and definite enough. But surely the Factor verses in The Twa Dogs 246 ROBERT BURNS dom in his lease in two years more, and to weather these we retrenched expenses ' — to the purpose and with the effect denoted ! Then came easier times. In 1777 William Burness removed his family to Lochlie, a hundred-and-thirty-acre farm, in Tar- bolton Parish. ' The nature of the bargain,' Robert wrote to Moore, ' was such as to throw a little i - eady money in his hand in the commencement/ or ' the affair would have been impracticable.' At this place, he adds, 'for four years we lived comfortably'; and at this place his gay and adventurous spirit be- gan to free itself, his admirable talent for talk to find fit opportunities for exercise and display. The reaction set in, as I have said, and he took life as gallantly as his innocency might, wore the only tied hair in the parish, was recognisable from afar by his fillemot plaid, was made a ' Free and Ac- cepted Mason,' 1 founded a Bachelors' Club, 2 and are less a picture than a record of proceedings, a note on the genus Factor : — ' He '11 stamp and threaten, curse and swear, He '11 apprehend them, poind their gear, While they must stand, wi' aspect humble, An' hear it a', and fear and tremble.' The statement is accurate enough, no doubt, but where is th-j ' picture ' ? Compare the effect of any one of Chaucer's Pilgrims, or the sketches of Cresar and Luath themselves, and the Factor as individual is found utterly wanting. 1 Burns was always an enthusiastic Mason. The Masonic idea — whatever that be — went home to him ; and in honour of the Craft he wrote some of his poorest verses. One set, the 'Adieu, Adieu,' etc., of the Kilmarnock Volume, was popular outside Scotland. At all events, I have seen a parody in a Belfast chap which is set to the tune of Burn's Farciocll. 2 It was, in fact, part drinking-club and part debating-society. But Rule X. of its constitution insisted that every member must ROBERT BURNS 247 took to sweethearting with all his heart and soul and strength. He had hegim with a little harvester at fifteen ; and at Kirkoswald he had been en- amoured of Peggy Thomson to the point of sleepless nisfhts. Now, says his brother Gilbert, f he was constantly the victim of some fair enslaver ' — some- times of two or three at a time ; and ' the symptoms of his passion were often such as nearly to equal those of the celebrated Sappho/ so that ' the agita- tion of his mind and body exceeded anything I know in real life.' Such, too, was the quality of what he himself was pleased to call f un penchant a (sic) l'adorable moitie du genre humain,' in com- bination with that 'particular jealousy' he had ' of people that were richer than himself, or who had more consequence in life,' that a plain face was quite as good as a pretty one: especially and par- ticularly if it belonged to a maid of a lower degree than his own. To condescend upon one's women — to some men that is an ideal. It was certainly the ideal of Robert Burns. ' His love,' says Gilbert, ' rarely settled upon persons of this description ' — that is, persons ' who were richer than himself, or who had more consequence in life.' He must still be Jove — still stoop from Olympus to the plain. Apparently he held it was an honour to be admired by him; and when, a short while hence (1786), he ventured to celebrate, in rather too realistic a strain, have at least one love-affair on hand ; and if potations were gener- ally thin, and debates were often serious, there can be no question that the talk ran on all manner of themes, and especially on that one theme which men have ever found fruitful above all others. The club was so great a success that an offshoot was founded, by desire, on Robert's removal to Mossgiel. 248 ROBERT BURNS the Lass of Ballochmyle, and was l'ebufFed for his impertinence — (it was so felt in those unregenerate days !) — he was, 'tis said, extremely mortified. In the meanwhile, his loves, whether pretty or plain, were goddesses all ; and the Sun was f entering Virgo, a month which is always a carnival in my imagination ' the whole year round ; and the wonder is that he got off so little of it all in verse which he thought too good for the fire. Rhyme he did (of course), and copiously : as at this stage every coming male must rhyme, who has instinct enough to ' couple but love and dove.' But it was not till the end of the Lochlie years that he began rhyming to any purpose. Indeed, the poverty of the Lochlie years is scarce less ' wonderful past all whooping ' than the fecundity of certain memorable months at Mauchline : especially if it be true, as Gilbert and himself aver, that the Lochlie love - affairs were ' governed by the strictest rules of modesty and virtue, from which he never deviated till his twenty- third year.' l For desire makes verses, and verses 1 Saunders Tait, the Tarbolton poetaster, insists that, long before Mossgiel, Burns and Sillar — 'Davie, a Brother Poet' — were the most incontinent youngsters in Tarbolton Parish ; and, after asseverating, in terms as solemn as he can make them, that in all Scotland ' There 's none like you and Burns can tout The bawd}' horn,' goes on to particularise, and declares that, what with ' Moll and Meg, Jean, Sue, and Lizzey, a' decoy't, There 's sax wi' egg.' Worse than all, he indites a 'poem,' a certain B — ns hi his Infancy, which begins thus : — ROBERT BURNS 249 rather good than bad, as surely as fruition leaves verses, whether bad or good, unmade. It was natural and honourable in a young man of this lusty and amatorious habit to look round for a wife and to cast about him for a better means of keeping one than farm-service would afford. In respect of the first he found a possibility in Ellison Begbie, a Galston farmer's daughter, at this time a domestic servant, on whom he wrote (they say) his ' Song of Similes,' and to whom he addressed some rather stately, not to say pedantic, documents in the form of love-letters. For the new line in life, he determined that it might, perhaps, be flax- dressing ; so, at the midsummer of 17S1 (having just before been sent about his business by, as he might himself have said, f le doux objet de son attachement') he removed to Irvine, a little port on the Firth of Clyde, which was also a centre of the industry in which he hoped to excel. Here he established himself, on what terms is not known, with one Peacock, whom he afterwards took occa- ' Now I must trace his pedigree, Because he made a song on me, And let the world look and sec, Just wi' my tongue, How he and Clootie did agree When he was young ' : — and of which I shall quote no more. But Robert and his brother are both explicit on this point ; and, despite the easy morals of the class in which the Bard sought now and ever 'to crown his flame,' it must be held, I think, as proven that he was dc'uiaise by Richard Brown at Irvine and by Betty Paton at Lochlic. This is the place to say that I owe my quotations from Saunders Tait to Dr. Grosart, who told mo of the cop}- (pro- 250 ROBERT BURNS sion to describe as f a scoundrel of the first water, who made money by the mystery of Thieving'; 1 here he saw something more of life and character and the world than he had seen at Mount Oliphant and Lochlie ; here, at the year's end, he had a terrible attack of vapours (it lasted for months, he says, so that he shuddered to recall the time); here, above all, he formed a friendship with a certain Richard Brown. According to him, Brown, being the son of a mechanic, had taken the eye of 'a great man in the neighbourhood,' and had received bably unique) of that worthy's Poems and Songs : ' Printed for and Sold by the Author Only, 1796': in the Mitchell Library, Glasgow, and at the same time communicated transcripts which he had made from such numbers in it as referred to Burns. As my collaborator, Mr. T. F. Henderson, was then in Scotland, I asked him to look up Tait's volume. It was found at last, after a prolonged search ; was duly sent to the Burns Exhibition ; and in a while was pronounced 'a discovery.' Tait, who was pedlar, tailor, soldier in turn, had a ribald and scurrilous tongue, a certain rough cleverness, and a good enough command of the vernacular ; so that his tirades against Burns — (he was one of the very few who dared to attack that satirist) — are still read- able, apart from the interest which attaches to their theme. It is a pity that some Burns Club or Burns Society has not reprinted them in full, coarse as they are. 1 Nobody knows what this may mean. It seems to be only Robert's lofty way of saying that Peacock swindled him. "What follows is explicit (Letter to Moore) : — 'To finish the whole, while we were giving a welcome carousal to the New Year, our shop, by the drunken carelessness of my partner's wife, took fire, and burned to ashes, and I was left, like a true poet, not worth sixpence.' How much is here of fact, how much of resentment, who shall say ? What is worth noting in it all is that Burns, despite his 'penchant a Padorable,' etc., is first and last a peasant so far as 'l'adorable inoitie' is concerned, and, for all his senti- mentalism, can face facts about it with all the peasant's shrewd- ness and with all the peasant's cynicism. ROBERT BURNS 251 'a genteel education, with a view to bettering his situation in life.' His patron had died, however, and he had had perforce to go for a sailor (he was afterwards captain of a West-Indiaman). He had known good luck and bad, he had seen the world, he had the morals of his calling, at the same time that ' his mind was fraught with courage, independ- ance, and magnanimity, and every noble, manly virtue ' ; and Burns, who ' loved him,' and ' admired him,' not only ' strove to imitate him ' but also ' in some measure succeeded.' ' I had,' the pupil owns, 'the pride before'; but Brown 'taught it to flow in proper channels.' Withal, Brown ' was the only man I ever saw who was a greater fool than myself when Woman was the presiding star.' Brown, however, was a practical amorist ; and he ' spoke of a certain fashionable failing with levity, which hither- to I had regarded with horror.' In fact, he was Mephisto to Burns's Faust ; * and ' here,' says the Bard, ' his friendship did me a mischief, and the consequence was, that soon after I assumed the plough, I wrote the enclosed Welcome.' This enclosure (to Moore) was that half-humorous, half- defiant, and wholly delightful Welcome to His Love- Begotten Daughter, 2 through which the spirit of the 1 Brown denied it. ' Illicit love ! ' quoth he. ' Levity of a sailor ! "When I first knew Burns he had nothing to learn in that respect.' It is a case of word against word ; and I own that I prefer the Bard's. 2 'The same cheap self-satisfaction finds a yet uglier vent when he plumes himself on the scandal at the birth of his first bastard child.' Thus Stevenson. But Stevenson, as hath been said, had in him ' something of the Shorter Catechist ' ; and either he did not see, or he would not recognise, that Burns's 252 ROBERT BURNS true Burns — the Burns of the good years : proud, generous, whole-hearted, essentially natural and humane — thrills from the first line to the last. And we have to recall the all-important fact, that Burns was first and last a peasant, 1 and first and last a peasant in revolt against the Kirk, a peasant resolute to be a buck, to forgive the really scandal- ous contrast presented in those versions of the affair — (versions done in the true buckish style : the leer and the grin and the slang in full blast) — which he has given in The Fornicator, the Epistle to John Rankine, and — apparently — the Reply to a Trimming Epistle from a Tailor. At the same time we must clearly understand that we recall all this for the sake of our precious selves, and not in any way, nor on any account, for the sake of Burns. He was absolutely of his station and his time ; the poor-living, lewd, grimy, free- spoken, ribald, old Scots peasant-world 2 came to a full, brilliant, even majestic close in his work; and, if we would appreciate aright the environment in which he wrote, and the audience to which such writings were addressed, we must transliterate into the Vernacular Brantome and the Dames Galantes and Tallemant and the Historiettes. As for reading rejoicings in the fact of paternity were absolutely sincere through- out his life. 1 Here and elsewhere the word is used, not opprobriously but, literally. Burns was specifically a peasant, as Byron was speci- fically a peer, and as Shakespeare was specifically a man of the burgess class. 2 I do not, of course, forget its many solid and admirable virtues ; but its elements were mixed, and it was to the grosser that the Burns of these and other rhymes appealed. ROBERT BURNS 253 them in Victorian terms — Early-Victorian terms, or Late — that way madness lies: madness, and a Burns that by no process known to gods or men could ever have existed save in the lubber-land of some Pious Editor's dream. At Lochlie, whither he seems to have returned in the March of 1782, the studious years 1 and the old comparative prosperity had come, or were coming, to a close. There had been a quarrel be- tween William Burness and his landlord, one M'Clure, a merchant in Ayr ; and this quarrel, being about money, duly passed into the Courts. Its circum- stances are obscure ; but it is history that arbitra- tion went against the tenant of Lochlie, that he was ordered to ' quite possession,' that he was strongly suspected of ' preparing himself accordingly by dispossessing of his stock and crops,' and that a certain ' application at present craving ' resulted, on shrieval authority, in the 'sequestration' of all the Lochlie stock and plenishing and gear. What- ever the rights and wrongs of the affair, an end came to it with the end of William Burness. By this time his health was broken — he was far gone in what Robert calls ' a phthisical consumption ' ; and he died in the February of the next year (17S4), when, as the same Robert romantically puts it in his fine, magniloquent fashion, ' his all went among the rapacious hell-hounds that growl in the Kennel of Justice.' 2 The fact that Robert and 1 It was parish gossip that, if you called on "William Burness at meal-time, you found the whole family with a book in one hand and a horn spoon in the other. 2 M'Clure's 'answers' and 'counter-answers,' together with the sheriff's officer's account of the seizure at Lochlie, were published 254 ROBERT BURNS Gilbert were able (Martinmas 1783), when their father's affairs were ' drawing to a crisis/ to secure another farm — Mossgiel — in Mauchline Parish, some two or three miles off Lochlie, is enough to show that neither errors nor crosses, neither sequestra- tions nor lampoons, had impaired the family credit, ill William Burness had paid his children wages during his tenancy of Lochlie; and the elder four, by present- ing themselves as his creditors for wages due, were enabled to secure a certain amount of ' plenishing in The Glasqoio Herald early in the present year (1897). I need scarce say that Saunders Tait produced a Burns at Lochly, in which he fell on his enemy tooth and claw. His statements are as specific as M'Clure's, and are substantially in agreement with some of them, besides : — ■ ' To Lochly ye came like a clerk, And on your back was scarce a sark, The dogs did at } T our buttocks bark, But now ye 're bra', Ye pouchH the rent, ye was sae stark, Made payment sma'.' In another stanza, 'M'Clure,' he says — ' Ye scarcely left a mite To fill his horn. You and the Lawyers gied him a skyte, Sold a' his corn.' In a third he appears to record the particulars of a single combat between Robert and his father's landlord : — ' His ain gun at him he did cock, An' never spared, Wi't owre his heid came a clean knock Maist killed the laird.' And in the last of all, after bitterly reproaching Robert and the whole Burns race witli ingratitude : — ROBERT BURNS 255 and gear ' wherewith to make a start at Mossgiel. It was a family venture, in whose success the Burnesses were interested all and severally, and to which each one looked for food and clothes and hire (the brothers got a yearly fee of £7 apiece) ; and, as all were well and thoroughly trained in farming work, and had never lived other than sparely, it was reasonable in them to believe that the enterprise would prosper. That it did not begin by prospering was no fault of Robert's. He made excellent re- solutions, and, what was more to the purpose, he kept them — for a time. He ' read farming books ' (thus he displays himself), he 'calculated crops,' he ' attended markets ' ; he worked hard in the fields, ' M 'Clure he put you in a farm, And coft you coals your a to warm And meal and maut. . . . He likewise did the mailin stock, And built you barns' :— he sets forth explicitly this charge : — ' M 'Clure's estate has ta'en the fever, And heal again it will be never, The vagabonds, they ca' you clever, Ye 're sic a sprite, To rive fra' him baith ga' and liver, And baith the feet.' The fact of the Laird's generosity is reaffirmed with emphasis in A Compliment : — ' The horse, corn, pets, kail, kye, and ewes, Cheese, pease, beans, rye, wool, house and flours, Pots, pans, crans, tongs, bran-spits, and skewrs, The milk and barm, Each thing they had was a' M 'Clure's, He stock'd the farm.' . . . And with the remark that 'Fire hundred pounds they were behind,' the undaunted Saunders brings his libel to a close. 256 ROBERT BURNS he kept his body at least in temperance and sober- ness, and, as for thrift, there is Gilbert's word for it, that his expenses never exceeded his income of £Tl a year. It availed him nothing. Gilbert is said to have been rather a theorist than a sound practician ; and Robert, though a skilled farmer, cared nothing for business, and left him a free hand in the conduct of affairs. Luck, too, was against them from the first ; and very soon the elder's genius was revealed to him, and he had other than farmer's work to do. ' In spite of the Devil,' he writes, c the world, and the flesh, I believe I should have been a wise man ; but the first year, from unfortunately buying in bad seed, the second, from a late harvest, we lost half of both our crops.' Naturally, ' this ' (and some other things) 'overset all my wisdom, and I returned, "like the dog to his vomit" — (be it remembered, it is Robert Burns who speaks : not I) — " and the sow that was washed, to her wallowing in the mire." That the confession, with its rather swaggering allusion to the Armour business, was true, is plain. But we do not need Burns's assui'ance to know that, though he could do his work, and prided himself on the straightness of his furrows, he was scarce cut out for a successful farmer — except, it may be, in certain special conditions. Endurance, patience, diligence, a devout attention to one's own interest and the land's, an indomitable constancy in labour to certain ends and in thought on certain lines — these are some of the qualities which make the hus- bandman ; and, this being so, how should Mossgiel have prospered under Rab the Ranter? His head was full of other things than crops and cattle. He ROBERT BURNS 257 was bursting with intelligence, ideas, the conscious- ness of capacity, the desire to take his place among men ; and in Mauchline he found livelier friends x and greater opportunities than he had found else- whei - e. Being a Scot, he was instinctively a theo- logian ; being himself, he was inevitably liberal- minded ; born a peasant of genius, and therefore a natural rebel, he could not choose but quarrel with the Kirk — especially as her hand was heavy on his friends and himself, — and it was as a Mauchline man that the best of his anti-clei*ical woi'k was done. 2 1 As his landlord, the lawyer Gavin Hamilton, to whom he dedicated the Kilmarnock Volume, and the story of whose wrangle with the Mauchline Kirk-Session (see Vol. i. pp. 147-152, 1S8, 378-9, etc.) is to some extent that of Burns's assault upon the Kirk (see Vol. ii. Holy Willie's Prayer, pp. 25-30, and Notes, pp. 320-324). Another was Robert Aiken, also a lawyer, by whom he was 'read into fame, 5 to whom he dedicated The Cotter's Saturday Night, and whom he celebrated in an Epitaph (Vol. i. p. 188). Yet another was Richmond, the lawyer's clerk, whose room he was afterwards to share in Edinburgh, and who appears to be partly responsible for the preservation of The Jolly Beggars. Again, there was the Bachelors' Club, on the model of that he had founded at Tarbolton, for whose edification, and in explanation of whose function, he appears to have written The Fornicator and The Court of Equity. This last is Burns's idea of what the proceedings of the Kirk-Session ought, in certain cases, to have been. It is capital fun, but something too frank and too particular for latter-day print. 2 He was ever a theological liberal and a theological dis- putant — a champion of Heterodox}-, in however mild a form, whose disputations made him notorious, so that his name was as a stumbling-block and an offence to the Orthodox. For the series of attacks which he delivered against the Kirk — The Holy Fair, the Address to the Dcil, The Twa Herds, The Ordina- tion, Holy Willie, The Kirk's Alarm, the Epistles To the Unco Guidand To John Goldic — see Vols. i. and ii. (Text and Notes). There is no record of an appearance on the stool with Baton ; but the circumstances of this his initial difficulty appear to be set VOL. IV. R 258 ROBERT BURNS Then, too, he was full of rhymes, and they must out of him : his call had come, and he fell to obeying it with unexampled diligence. More than all, perhaps, he had the temperament of the viveur — the man who rejoices to live his life ; and his appetites had been intensified, his gift of appreciation made abnormal (so to say), by a boyhood and an adolescence of singular hardship and quite exceptional continence. It is too late in the world's history to apologise for the primordial instinct; and to do so at any time were sheer impertinence and unreasoning in- gratitude. To apologise in the case of a man who so exulted in its manifestations and results, and who so valiantly, not to say riotously, insisted on the fact of that exultation, as Robert Burns, were also a rank and frank absurdity. On this point he makes doubt impossible. The ' white flower of a blameless life ' was never a button-hole for him : 1 his utterances, published and unpublished, forth in the Epistle to Bankinc (i. 155) and the Reply to a Trim- ming Epistle (ii. 96), with the Notes thereto appended. All these read, considered, and digested, what interest remains in Burns's quarrel with the Kirk consists in the fact that, being a person naturally and invincibly opposed to the 'sour-featured Whiggism ' on which the Stuarts had wrecked themselves, Burns was naturally and invincibly a Jacobite. His Jacobitism was, he said, ' by way of vive la bagatelle.' He told Ramsay of Auchtertyre that he owed it to the plundering and unhousing (1715) of his grand- father, who was gardener to Earl Marischal at Inverurie {sic). But it came to him mainly through Gavin Hamilton (who was Episco- palian by descent) and his own resentment of clerical tyranny. 1 It is true that he wrote thus ' To a Young Friend ' :— 'The sacred lowe o' weel-plac'd love, Luxuriantly indulge it ; But never tempt th' illicit rove, Tho' naething should divulge it : ROBERT BURNS 259 are there to show that he would have disdained the presumption that it ever could have been. And it is from Mauchline, practically, that, his affair with Betty Paton over and done with, and, to anticipate a little, his affair with Jean Armour left hanging in the wind, he starts on his career as amorist at large. And now for a little narrative. In the November of 1784 Elizabeth Paton bore him a daughter: 'the First Instance,' so he wrote above his Welcome, ' that entitled him to the Venerable Appellation of Father.' The mother is described as ' very plain- looking/ but of ' an exceedingly handsome figure ' ; 'rude and uncultivated to a great degree,' with a 'strong masculine understanding, and a thorough, though unwomanly, contempt for any sort of refine- ment '; withal, ' so active, honest, and independent a creature ' that Mrs. Burns would have had Robert marry her, but ' both my aunts and Uncle Gilbert opposed it,' in the belief that 'the faults of her character would soon have disgusted him.' There had been no promise on his part ; and though the I waive the quantum o' the sin, The hazard of concealing ; But, och ! it hardens a' within, And petrifies the feeling ! ' But there is plenty to show that the writer was a great deal better at preaching than at practice. And he owns as much him- self in his own epitaph :— ' Is there a man, whose judgment clear Can others teach the course to steer, Yet runs, himself, life's mad career Wild as the wave ? — Here jJause — and, thro' the starting tear, Survey this grave.' 260 ROBERT BURNS reporter (his niece, Isabella Begg) has his own sister's warrant — (Mrs. Begg, by the way, was rather what her brother, in a mood of acute fraternal piety, might possibly have called ' a bletherin' b — tch ') — for saying that ' woman never loved man with a more earnest devotion than that poor woman did him/ he in nowise sentimentalised about her. She is identified with none of his songs ; and while there is a pleasant reference to her in the Welcome : — ' Thy mitlier's person, grace, and merit ' : — she is recognisably the 'paitrick' of the Epistle to Rankine, she is certainly the heroine of The Forni- cator, she probably does duty in the Reply to a Trimming Epistle, none of which pieces shows the writer's 'penchant a 1 'adorable/ etc., to advantage. No doubt, they were addressed to men. No doubt, too, they were, first and last, satirical impeachments of the Kirk : impeachments tinctured with the pea- sant's scorn of certain existing circumstances, and done with all the vigour and the juria which one particular peasant — a peasant who could see through shams and was intolerant of them — could with both hands bestow. And that the women did not resent their share in such things is shown by the fact that such things got done. It was ' the tune of the time ' — in the peasant-world at least. Still, as Diderot says somewhere or other : — ' On aime celle a qui on le donne, on est aime de celle a qui on le prend.' And one can't help regretting that there are few or none but derisive references to Betty Paton in her lover's work. ROBERT BURNS 2dl IV Of vastly greater importance than his mistresses, at this or any period of his life, is the entity, which, with an odd little touch of Eighteenth Century formality, he loved to call his Muse. That entity was now beginning to take shape and substance as a factor in the sum of the world's happiness ; and the coming of that other entity in whose existence he took so high a pride and so constant a delight — I mean 'the Bard' — was but a matter of time. Burns had been ever a rhymester; and Burns, who, as Stevenson observed, and as the Notes to these Volumes have shown, 'was always ready to borrow the hint of a design, as though he had some difficulty in commencing,' had begun by borrowing his style, as well as divers hints of designs, from stall-artists and neighbour-cuckoos. But, once emancipated, once a man, once practi- cally assured of the primal concerns of life, once conscious that (after all) he might have the root of the matter in him, the merely local poet begins to waver and dislimn, and the Burns of Poor Mailie (written at Lochlie) and the Epistle to Davie reigns — intermittently, perhaps, but ob- viously — in his stead. It is all over with stall-artists and neighbour- cuckoos. Poor Fergusson's book 1 1 Robert Fergusson (1750-1774) was certainly a prime influence in Burns's poetical life. Nevertheless — or shall I say consequently? —he has had less than justice from the most of Burns's Editors. Yet in his way he was so remarkable a creature that there can be no question but in his death, at four-and-twenty, a great loss was inflicted on Scottish literature. He had intelligence and an eye, a right touch of humour, the gifts of invention 262 ROBERT BURNS has fallen into his hands, and (as he says in his ridiculous way) has ' caused him to string anew his wildly-sounding rustic lyre with emulating vigour.' At last the hour of the Vernacular Muse has come ; and he is hip to haunch with such adepts in her mystery as the Sempills, and Hamilton of Gilbert- field, and Allan Ramsay, and Robert Fergusson, and the innominates whose verses, decent or not, have lived in his ear since childhood : catching their tone and their sentiment ; mastering their rhythms; copy- ing their methods ; considering their effects in the one true language of his mind. 1 He could write and observation and style, together with a true feeling for country and city alike ; and his work in the Vernacular (his English verse is rubbish), with its easy expressiveness, its vivid and unshrinking realism, and a merit in the matter of character and situation which makes it — not readable only, but — interesting as art, at the same time that it is valuable as history, is nothing less than memorable : especially in view of the miserable circum- stances — (the poor lad was a starveling scrivener, and died, partly of drink, in the public madhouse) — in which it was done. Burns, who learned much from Fergusson, was an enthusiast in his regard for him ; bared his head and shed tears over 'the green mound and the scattered go wans ' under which he found his ex- emplar lying in Canongate Churchyard ; got leave from the managers to put up a headstone at his own cost there, and wrote an epitaph to be inscribed upon it, one line of which — ' No storied urn nor animated bust,' is somehow to be read in Gray's Elegy in a Country Churchyard. Fergusson was as essentially an Edinburgh product — (the old Scots capital : gay, squalid, drunken, dirty, lettered, vener- able : lives in his verses much as Burns knew it twelve years after his death)— as the late R. L. S. himself ; and, while I write, old memories come back to me of the admiring terms : terms half-playful, half-affectionate : in which the later artist was wont to speak of his all but forgotten ancestor. 1 I do not forget that Dugald Stewart noted the correctness of his speech and the success with which he avoided the use of ROBERT BURNS 263 deliberate English, and, when he wanted to be not so much sincere as impressive and e fine,' he wrote English deliberately, as the worse and weaker part of his achievement remains to prove. He could even write English, as Jourdain talked prose, ' with- out knowing it' — as we know from Scots Wha Hue. He read Pope, Shenstone, Beattie, Gold- smith, Gray, and the rest, with so much enthusiasm that one learned Editor has made an interesting little list of pilferings from the works of these dis- tinguished beings. But, so far as I can see, he might have lived and died an English-writing Scot, and nobody been a thrill or a memory the better for his work. It is true that much of the Saturday Night and the Vision and the Mountain Daisy is written in English ; l but one may take leave to Scotticisms. But in his day Scots was, not an accent but, a living tongue ; and he certainly could not have talked at Mauchline and at Dumfries as he did in a more or less polite and Anglified Edinburgh. 1 He contrives a compromise, to admirable purpose, too, in Tarn o' Shantcr : which is written partly in English and partly in the Vernacular. But (1) Tamo' Shantcr is in a rhythmus classical in Scotland since the time of Barbour's Bruce ; (2) the English I_arts of Tarn o' Shantcr are of no particular merit as poetry — that \i, 'the only words in the only order'; and (3) the best of Taia o' Shanter is in the Vernacular alone. Contrast, for instance, the diabolical fire and movement and energy of these lines : — ' They reeled, they set, they cross'd, they cleekit, Till ilka carlin swat and reekit, And coost her duddies to the wark, And linket at it in her sark' : — with another famous — perhaps too famous — passage : — ' But pleasures are like poppies spread : You seize the flower, its bloom is shed,' etc. In the second the result is merely Hudibrastic. In the first the 264 ROBERT BURNS wonder if these pieces, with so much else of Burns's own, would have escaped the ' iniquity of Oblivion/ had they not chanced, to their good fortune, to be companioned with Halloween, and Holy Willie, and The Farmer to His Aidd Marc, and a score of masterpieces besides, in which the Vernacular is carried to the highest level — in the matter of force and fire, and brilliancy of diction, and finality of effect, to name but these — it has ever reached in verse. 1 Let this be as it may : there can be no ques- tion that when Burns wrote English he wrote what, on his own confession, was practically a foreign suggestion — of mingled fury and stink and motion and heat and immitigable ardour— could only have been conveyed by the Vernacular Burns. 1 It was "Wordsworth's misfortune that, being in revolt against Augustan ideals and a worn-out poetic slang, he fell in with Burns, and sought to make himself out of common English just such a vocabulary as Burns's own. For he forgot that the Vernacular, in which his exemplar achieved such surprising and delectable results, had been a literary language for centuries when Burns began to work in it — that Burns, in fact, was handling with consummate skill a tool whose capacity had been long since proved by Ramsay and Fergusson and the greater men who went before them ; and, having no models to copy, and no verbal inspiration but his own to keep him straight, he came tc immortal grief, not once but many times. It is pretended, too, that in the matter of style Burns had a strong influence on Byron. But had he ? Byron praises Burns, of course ; but is there ever a trace of Burns the lyrist in the Byron songs? Again, the Byron of Childe Harold and the tales was as it were a Babel in himself, and wrote Scott plus Coleridge plus Moore plus Beattie and Pope and the Augustan Ago at large ; while the Byron of JBcppo and the Vision and Don Juan approves himself the master of a style of such infernal brilliancy and variety, of such a capacity for ranging heaven-high and hell-deep, that it cannot without absurdity be referred to anything except the fact that ho also was a born great writer. ROBERT BURNS 265 tongue — a tongue in which he, no more than Fergus- son or Ramsay, could express himself to any sufficing purpose ; but that, when he used the dialect which he had babbled in babyhood, and spoken as boy and youth and man — the tongue, too, in which the chief exemplars and the ruling influences of his poetical life had wrought — he at once revealed himself for its greatest master since Dunbar. 1 More, much more, than that : his bearings once found, he marked his use of it by the discovery of a quantity hitherto unknown in literature. Himself, to wit: the amazing compound of style and senti- ment with gaiety and sympathy, of wit and tender- 1 For that is what it comes to in the end. He may seem to have little to do with Catholic and Feudal .Scotland, and as little with the Scotland of the Early Reformation and the First Cove- nant. Also, it is now impossible to say if he knew any more of Scott and Dunbar and the older makers (Davie Lindsaj 7 and Harbour excepted) than he found in The Ever Green, which Ramsay garbled out of The Bannatyne MS., if he were read in Pinker- ton (1786), or if he got much more out of Gawain Douglas than the verse which serves as a motto to Tarn o' Shanter : though a letter to Cleghorn shows that he certainl}- possessed a' copy of that poet before 1700. The Scotland he represents, and of which his verses are the mirror, is the Scotland out of which the 'wild Whigs' crushed the taste for everj-thing but fornication and theology and such expressions of derision and revolt as Jenny M l C?-aiv and Eri-ock Brae : the Scotland whose literal - }- beginnings date, you'd fancy, not from Henryson, not from Dunbar and Douglas and the Lyon King-at-Arms, but from Sempill of Beltrees and the men who figure in the three issues of Watson's Choice Collection. But Ramsay and his fellows were a revival — not a new birth. The Vernacular School is one and indivisible. There are breaks in the effect ; but the tradition remains unbroken. And Burns, for all his comparative modernity, descends directlj- from, and is, in fact, the last of that noble line which begins with Robert Henryson. 266 ROBERT BURNS ness with radiant humour and an admirable sense of art, which is Robert Burns. He could write ill, and was capable of fustian. But, excepting in his ' Epigrams ' and ' Epitaphs' and in his imitations of poets whose methods he did not understand, he was nearly always a great writer, and he was generally (to say the least) incapable of fustian in the Vernacular. In essaying the effects of Pope and Shenstone and those other unfamiliars, he was like a man with a personal hand set to imitate a writing-master's copy : he made as good a shot as he could at it, but there was none of him- self in the result. It was otherguess work when he took on the methods and the styles in which his countrymen had approved themselves: these he could compass so well that he could far surpass his exemplars technically, and could adequately express the individual Burns besides. The Death and Dying Words of Poor Mailie (written at Lochlie, and there- fore very early work) trace back to Gilbertfield's Bonnie Heck; but the older piece is realistic in purpose and brutal in effect, while in the later — to say nothing of the farce in Hughoc— the whole philosophy of life of a decent mother - ewe is imagined with delightful humour, and set forth in terms so kindly in spirit and so apt in style, that the Death and Dying Words is counted one of the imperishables in English letters. Contrast, again, the Elegy, written some time after the Death and Dying Words, on this immortal beast, with its exemplars in Watson and Ramsay : — ' lie was right nacky in liis way, An' eydent baith be night and day ; ROBERT BURNS 267 He wi' the lads his part could play When right sair need, He gart them good bull-sillar pay ; But now he 's dead. . . .' ( Wha'll jow Ale on my drouthy Tongue, To cool the heat of Lights and Lung ? \Y r ha '11 bid me, when the Kaile-bell 's rung, To Buird me speed ? . . . Wha'll set me by the Barrel-bung? Since Sanny 's dead ? . . .' He was good Company at Jeists, And wanton when he came to Feasts ; He scorn'd the Converse of great Beasts [F]or a Sheep's-head ; He leugh at Stories about Ghaists — Blyth Willie's dead':— and you shall find the difference still more glaring. Cleverness apart — cleverness and the touch of life, the element of realism — the Laments for HabSimson and Sanny Briggs, for John Cowper and Luckie Wood and the Writer Lithgow, 1 are merely squalid and cynical ; while in every line the Elegy, in despite of realism and the humorous tone and intent 1 All five, together with Ramsay's on Luckie Spence (an Edin- burgh bawd) and Last Words of a Wretched Miser, should be read for the sake of their likeness, and at the same time their unlikeness, to not a little in Burns, and in illustration of the truth that the Vernacular tradition was one of humorous, and even brutal realism. I have cited R. L. S. in connexion with Fergusson. He had a far higher esteem for that maker than ho had for that maker's ancestor, Allan Ramsay. Yet he quoted to me one day a stanza from the John Coivper, a certain phrase in which — a phrase obscenely significant of death — was, we presently agreed, as good an example of ' the Squalid-Picturesque ' as could bo found out of Villon. 268 ROBERT BURNS (essential to the models and therefore inevitable in the copy) is the work of a writer of genius, who is also a generous human being. 1 Very early work, again, are Corn Rigs and Green Grow the Rashes ; in suggestion, inspiration, technical quality, both are unalterably Scots ; and in both the effect of mastery and completeness is of those that defy the touch of Time. To compare these two and any two of Burns's songs in English, or pseudo-English, is to realise that the poet of these two should never have ventured outside the pale of his supremacy. English had ten thousand secrets which he knew not, nor could ever have known, except imperfectly; for he recked not of those innumerable traditions, associations, connotations, surprises, as it were ambi- tions, which make up the romantic and the literary life of words — even as he was penetrated and possessed by the sense of any such elements as may have existed in the Vernacular. Thus, if he read Milton, it was largely, if not wholly, with a view to getting himself up as a kind of Tarbolton Satan. He was careless, so I must contend, of Shakespeare. With such knowledge as he could glean from song-books, he was altogether out of touch with the Elizabethans and the Carolines. Outside the Vernacular, in fact, he was a rather 1 His suppression of such an old-fashioned touch in the first draft as this one : — ' Now Robin greetan chows the hams Of Mailie dead ' :— is significant. It is quite in the vein of Bonnie Heck, as indeed arc the first four stanzas. But it would have ruined the Elegy as the world has known it since 1780. ROBERT BURNS 269 unlettered Eighteenth Century Englishman, and the models which he must naturally prefer before all others were academic, stilted, artificial, and unexemplary to the highest point. It may be that I read the verse of Burns, and all Scots verse, with something of that feeling of 'precious- ness ' which everybody has, I take it, in reading a language, or a dialect, not his own : the feeling which blinds one to certain sorts of defect, and gives one an uncritical capacity for appreciating certain sorts of merit. However this be, I can cer- tainly read my mother-tongue ; and most English- men — with, I should imagine, many Scots — will agree with me in the wish that Burns, for all the brilliant compromise between Scots and English which is devised and done in Tarn o Shanter and elsewhere, had never pretended to a mastery which assuredlv he had not, nor in his conditions ever could have had. I have stressed this point because I wish to stress another, and with a view to making clear, and to setting in its proper perspective, the fact that, genius apart, Burns was, no miracle but, a natural development of circumstance and time. The fact is patent enough to all but them that, for a super- stition's sake, insist on ignoring history, and decline to recognise the unchanging processes of natural and social Law. Without the achievement of vEschylus, there can be no such perfection as Sophocles : just as, that perfection achieved, the decline of Tragedy, as in Euripides, is but a matter of time. But for the Middle Ages and the reaction against the Middle Ages there could have been 270 ROBERT BURNS no Ronsard, no Rabelais, no Montaigne in France. Had there been no Surrey and no Marlowe,, no Chaucer and no Ovid (to name no more than these in a hundred influences), who shall take on himself to say the shape in which we now should be privileged to regard the greatest artist that ever expressed himself in speech ? It is in all depart- ments of human energy as in the eternal round of nature. There can be no birth where there is no preparation. The sower must take his seedsheet, and go afield into ground prepared for his minis- trations ; or there can be no harvest. The Poet springs from a compost of ideals and experiences and achievements, whose essences he absorbs and assimilates, and in whose absence he could not be the Poet. This is especially true of Burns. He was the last of a school. It culminated in him, because he had more genius, and genius of a finer, a rarer, and a more generous quality, than all his immediate ancestors put together. But he cannot fairly be said to have contributed any- thing to it except himself. He invented none of its forms; its spirit was not of his origin- ating ; its ideals and standards of perfection were discovered, and partly realised, by other men ; and he had a certain timidity, as it were a faineantise, in conception — a kind of unreadiness in initiative — which makes him more largely dependent upon his exemplars than any great poet has ever been. Not only does he take whatever the Vernacular School can give in such matters as tone, senti- ment, method, diction, phrase ; but also, he is content to run in debt to it for suggestions as ROBERT BURNS 271 regards ideas and for models in style. Hamilton of Gilbertfield and Allan Ramsay conventionalise the Rhymed Epistle ; and he accepts the conven- tion as it left their hands, and produces epistles in rhyme which are glorified Hamilton-Ramsay. Fergusson writes Caller Water, and Leilh Races, and The Farmer's Ingle, and Planeslanes and Causey, and the Ode to the Gowdspink ; and he follows suit with Scotch Drink, and the Saturday Night, and The Holy Fair, and The Brigs of Ayr, and the Mouse and the Mountain Daisy. Sempill of Beltrees starts a tradition with The Piper of Kil- barchan ; and his effect is plain in the elegies on Tarn Samson and Poor Mailie. Ramsay sees a Vision, and tinkers old, indecent songs, and writes comic tales in glib octo-syllabics ; and in- stinctively and naturally Burns does all three. It is as though some touch of rivalry were needed to put him on his mettle : l as though, instead of writing and caring for himself alone — (as Keats and Byron did, and Shelley : new men all, and founders of dynasties, not final expressions of sovranty) — to be himself he must still be emulous of some one 1 It was with 'emulating vigour' that he strung his 'wildly- sounding rustic lyre ' ; and he read Ramsay and Fergusson not 'for servile imitation' but ' to kindle at their flame.' Another instance, or rather another suggestion, from himself, and I have done. It ' exalted,' it ' enraptured ' him ' to walk in the sheltered side of a wood, or high plantation, in a cloudy winter day,' and hear the wind roaring in the trees. Then was his ' best season for devotion,' for then was his mind 'rapt up in a kind of enthusiasm to Him who ..." walks on the wings of the wind." ' The ' rapture' and the ' exaltation ' are but dimly and vaguely reflected in his Winter. But if some ancestor had tried to express a kindred feeling, then had Winter been a masterpiece. 272 ROBERT BURNS else. This is not written as a reproach : it is stated as a fact. On the strength of that fact one cannot choose but abate the old, fantastic estimate of Burns's originality. But originality (to which, by the way, he laid no claim) is but one element in the intricately formed and subtly ordered plexus, which is called genius ; and I do not know that we need think any the less of Burns for that it is not predominant in him. Original or not, he had the Vernacular and its methods at his fingers' ends. He wrote the heroic couplet (on the Dryden-Pope convention) clumsily, and without the faintest idea of what it had been in Marlowe's hands, without the dimmest foreshadow- ing of what it was presently to be in Keats' s ; he had no skill in what is called ' blank verse ' — by which I mean the metre in which Shakespeare triumphed, and Milton after Shakespeare, and Thomson and Cowper, each according to his lights, after Shakespeare and Milton ; he was a kind of hob-nailed Gray in his use of choric strophes and in his apprehension of the ode. But he entered into the possession of such artful and difficult stanzas as that of Montgomerie's Banks of Helicon and his own favourite sextain as an heir upon the ownership of an estate which he has known in all its details since he could know anything. It was fortunate for him and for his book, as it was fortunate for the world at large — as, too, it was afterwards to be fortunate for Scots song — that he was thus imitative in kind and thus traditional in practice. He had the sole ear of the Vernacular Muse ; there was not a tool in her budget of which he was not master ; and he took ROBERT BURNS 273 his place, the moment he moved for it, not so much, perhaps, by reason of his uncommon capa- city l as, because he discovered himself to his public in the very terms — of diction, form, style, sentiment even — with which that public was familiar from of old, and in which it was waiting and longing to be addressed. It was at Mossgiel that the enormous possibilities in Burns were revealed to Burns himself; and it was at Mossgiel that he did nearly all his best and strongest work. The revelation once made, he staved not in his course, but wrote masterpiece after master- piece, with a rapidity, an assurance, a command of means, a brilliancy of effect, which make his achieve- ment one of the most remarkable in English letters. To them that can rejoice in the Vernacular his very titles are enough to recall a little special world of variety and character and delight : the world, in fact, where you can take your choice among lyrical gems like Corn Rigs and Green Grow the Rashes and Mary Morison and masterpieces of satire like Holy Willie and the Address io the Unco Guid. To this time belong The Jolly Beggars and Halloween and The Holy Fair; to this time the Louse and the Mouse, the Auld Mare and the Tiva Dogs ; to this time, 1 In the same way Byron sold four or five editions of the English Bards, because it was written on a convention which was as old as Bishop Hall, and had been used by every satirist from the time of that master down to Mathias and Giiford. If he had cast his lihellus into the octaves of Don Juan, the strong presumption is that it would have fallen still-born from the press. Other cases in point are Blake, Wordsworth, Shelley, Keats, and Browning : the manner of each was new, and not all have reached the general yet. VOL. IV. S 274 ROBERT BURNS Scotch Drink and the Address to the Deil, the Earnest Cry and the Mountain Daisy, the Epistles to Smith and Rankine and Sillar and Lapraik, the Elegies on Tarn Samson and the never-to-be-forgotten Mailie, the Reply to a Tailor and the Welcome and the Satur- day Night. In some, as The Ordination, The Holy Tulyie, and, despite an unrivalled and inimitable picture of drunkenness, Hornbook itself, with others in a greater or less degree, the interest, once you have appreciated the technical quality as it deserves, is very largely local and particular. 1 In others, as the Saturday Night and The Vision (after the first stanzas of description), it is also very largely sentimental ; and in both these it is further vitiated by the writer's 'falling to his English,' to a purpose not exhilarating to the student of Shakespeare and Milton and Herrick. But all this notwithstanding, and notwithstanding quite a little crowd of careless rhymes, the level of excel- lence is one that none but the born great writer can maintain. Bold, graphic, variable, expressive, packed with observations and ideas, the phrases go ringing and glittering on through verse after verse, through stave after stave, through poem after poem, in a way that makes the reading of this peasant a 1 There is a sense in which the most are local— are parochial even. In Holy Willie itself the type is not merely the Scots Calvinistic pharisec : it is a particular expression of that type ; the thing is a local satire introducing the ' kail and potatoes ' of a local scandal. Take, too, The Holy Fair : the circumstances, the manners, the characters, the experience— all are local. Apply the test to almost any— not forgetting the Tarn o' Sfianter which is the top of Burns's achievement— and the result is the same. ROBERT BURNS 275 peculiar pleasure for the student of style. 1 And if, with an eye for words and effects in words, that student have also the faculty of laughter, then are his admiration and his pleasure multiplied ten-fold. For the master-quality of Burns, the quality which has gone, and will ever go, the furthest to make him universally and perennially acceptable — acceptable in Melbourne (say) a hundred years hence as in Mauchline a hundred years syne — is humour. His sentiment is sometimes strained, obvious, and deliberate — as might be expected of the poet who foundered two pocket-copies of that very silly and disgusting book, The Man of Feeling ; and it 1 It is not, remember, for 'the love of lovely words,' not for such perfections of human utterance as abound in Shakespeare: — ' Gilding pale streams with heavenly alchemy ' : — in Milton : — ' Now to the moon in wavering morrice move ' : — in Keats : — ' And hides the green hill in an April shroud ' : — in Herrick : — ' Ye have been fresh and green, Ye have been filled with flowers, And ye the walks have been "Where maids have spent their hours ' : — that we revert to Burns. Felicities he has — felicities innumer- able ; but his forebears set themselves to be humorous, racy, natural, and he could not choose but follow their lead. Th Colloquial triumphs in his verse as nowhere outside the Vision and Don Juan ; but for Beauty we must go elsewhither. He has all manner of qualities : wit, fancy, vision of a kind, nature, gaiety, the richest humour, a sort of homespun verbal magic. But, if we be in quest of Beauty, we must e'en ignore him, and ' fall to our English ' : of whose secrets, as I 've said, he never so much as suspected the existence, and whose supreme capacities were sealed from him until the end. 276 ROBERT BURNS often rings a little false, as in much of the Saturday Night. But his humour — broad, rich, prevailing, now lascivious or gargantuan and now fanciful or jocose, now satirical and brutal and now in- stinct with sympathy, is ever irresistible. Holy Willie is much more vigorously alive in London, and Sydney, and Cape Town to-day than poor drunken old Will Fisher was in the Mauchline of 1785. That ' pagan full of pride,' the vigilant, tricksy, truculent, familiar, true-blue Devil lives ever in Burns's part pitying and fanciful, part humorous and controversial presentment ; but he has long since faded out of his strongholds in the Kirk : — 1 But fare-ye-weel, Auld Nickie-Ben, O, wad ye tak' a thocht, an' men', Ye aiblins micht — I dinna ken — Still liae a stake ! I 'm wae to think upon yon den, Ev'n for your sake.' Lockhart, ever the true Son of the Manse, was so misguided — so mansified, to coin a word — as to wish that Burns had written a Holy Fair in the spirit and to the purpose of The Cotter's Saturday Night. But the bright, distinguishing qualities of The Holy Fair are humour and experience and sincerity ; the intent of the Saturday Night is idyllic and senti- mental, as its effect is laboured and unreal ; and I, for my part, would not give my Holy Fair, still less my Halloween or my Jolly Beggars — observed, selected, excellently reported — for a wilderness of Saturday Nights. It is not hard to understand that (given the prcstance of its author) the Saturday Night ROBERT BURNS 277 was doomed to popularity from the first : a being of its essence sentimental and therefore pleasingly un- true, and being, also of its essence, patriotic — an assertion of the honour and the glory and the piety of Scotland. But that any one with an eye for fact and an ear for verse should prefer its tenuity of inspiration and its poverty of rhythm and diction before the sincere and abounding humour and the notable mastery of means, before the plenitude of life and the complete accord of design and effect, by which Halloween, and The Holy Fair, and nine- tenths of the early pieces in the Vernacular are distinguished, appears inexplicable. In these Burns is an artist and a poet : in the Saturday Night he is neither one nor other. In these, and in Tarn o' Shanter, the Scots School culminates : as English Drama, with lyrical and elegiac English, culminates in Othello and the Sonnets, in Antony and Cleopatra and the Adonis and The Rape of Lucrece : more gloriously far than the world would ever have wagered on its beginnings. It is the most indi- vidual asset in the heritage bequeathed by ' the Bard ' ; and still more, perhaps,' 2 than the Songs, 1 And such popularity! 'Poosie Nansie's' — (thus writes a friend, even as these sheets are passing through the press) — 'or rather a house on the site of Poosie Nansie's, is, as j r ou know, still a tavern. There is a large room (for parties) at the back. And what, think you, is the poem that, printed and framed and glazed, is hung in the place of honour on its walls ? " The Jolly Beggars — naturally ? " Not a bit of it. The Cotter's Saturday Night ! Surrounded, too, by engravings depicting its choicest moments and its most affecting scenes.' 2 I say, ' perhaps, ' because Burns, among the general at least, is better sung than read. But if the Songs, his own and those which are effects of a collaboration, be the more national, the 278 ROBERT BURNS it stamps and keeps him the National Poet. The world it pictures — the world of ' Scotch morals, Scotch Religion, and Scotch drink ' — may be ugly or not (as refracted through his temperament, it is not). Ugly or not, however, it was the world of Burns ; to paint it was part of his mission ; it lives for us in his pictures ; and many such attempts at reconstruction as The Earthly Paradise and The Idylls of the King will ' fade far away, dissolve/ and be quite forgotten, ere these pictures disfeature or dislimn. He had the good sense to concern himself with the life he knew. The way of realism x lay Poems are the greater, and it is chiefly to the Poems that Burns is indebted for his place in literature. 1 It is claimed for him, with perfect truth, that he went straight to Nature. But the Vernacular makers seldom did anjthing else. An intense and abiding consciousness of the common circum- stances of life was ever the distinguishing note of Scots Poetry. It thrills through Henryson, through Dunbar and the Douglas of certain ' Prolougs ' to Eneados, through Lindsay and Scott, through the nameless lyrist of Peeblis at the Play and Christ's Kirk on the Green, through much of The Bannatyne MS., the Sempill of the Tulchene Bischope, the Montgomerie of the Flyting with Polwarth and of certain sonnets : — ' Raw reid herring reistit in the reik.' It is even audible in the Guid and Godlie Ballats ; and after the silence it is heard anew in the verse which was made despite the Kirk, and in the verse which proceeded from that verse — the verse, that is, of Ramsay and Fergusson and Burns. This vivid and curious interest in facts is, as I think, a characteristic of the 'perfervid ingyne.' Compare, for instance, Pitscottie and Knox on the murder of Cardinal Beaton. The one is something naive, the other as it were Shakespearean ; but in both the element of particularity is vital to the complete effect. These are two instances only ; but I could easily give two hundred. (See jiost p. 323, Note 1.) To return to Burns and his treatment of weather (say) and landscape. His verse is full of realities : — ROBERT BURNS 279 broad-beaten by his ancestors, and was natural to his feet ; he followed it with vision, with humour, with ' inspiration and sympathy,' and with art ; and in the sequel he is found to have a place of his own in the first flight of English poets after Milton, Chaucer, Shakespeare. I take it that Burns was not more multifarious in his loves than most others in whom the primordial instinct is of peculiar strength. But it was written that English literature — the literature of Chaucer, Shakespeare, Fielding — should be turned into a kind of schoolgirls' playground ; so that careful Editors have done their best to make him even as themselves, and to fit him with a suit of practical and literary morals, which, if his own verse and prose mean anything, he would have refused, with all the contumely of which his ' Carrick lips ' were ' When lyart leaves bestrow the yird, Or, wavering like the bauckie-bird, Bedim cauld Boreas' blast ; When hailstanes drive wi' bitter skyte. . . .' 'The burn stealing under the lang, yellow broom. . . .' 'When, tumbling brown, the burn comes down. . . .' 'The speedy gleams the darkness swallowed. . . .' ' Yon murky cloud is foul with rain. . . .' 'November chill blaws loud wi' angry sugh' :— all exactly noted and vividly recorded (a very instructive instance is the 'burnie' stanza in Halloween; for he had, they say, a peculiar delight in running water). But for great, imaginative impressions : — ' Those green-robed senators of mighty woods, Tall oaks branch-charmed by the earnest stars' :— you turn to other books than his. 280 ROBERT BURNS capable, to wear. Nothing has exercised their in- genuity, their talent for chronology, their capacity for invention (even), so vigorously as the task of squaring their theory of Burns with the story of his marriage and the legend of his Highland Lassie. Now is the moment to deal with both. Elizabeth Paton's child was born in the November of 1784. In the April of that year, a few weeks after the general settlement at Mossgiel, he made the acquaintance of Armour the mason's daughter, Jean. She was a handsome, lively girl ; the acquaintance ripened into love on both sides ; and in the end, after what dates approve a prolonged and serious courtship, Armour fell with child. Her condition being discovered, Burns, after some strong revulsions of feeling against — not Jean, I hope, but — the estate of marriage, gave her what he presently had every reason to call 'an unlucky paper,' recognising her as his wife ; and, had things been allowed to drift in the usual way, the world had lacked an unforgotten scandal and a great deal of silly writing. This, though, was not to be. Old Armour — ( f a bit mason body, who used to snuff a guid deal, and gey af 'en tak' a bit dram ') — is said to have 'hated' Burns : so that he would 'reyther hae seen the Deil himsel' comin' to the hoose to coort his dochter than him.' Thus a contemporary of both Armour and Burns ; and in any case Armour knew Burns for a needy and reck- less man, the father of one by-blow, a rebel at odds with the Orthodox, of whom, in existing circumstances, it would be vain to ask a comfort- able living. So he first obliged Jean to give up ROBERT BURNS 281 the ' unlucky paper,' with a view to unmaking any engagement it might confirm, 1 and then sent her to Paisley, to he out of her lover's way. In the meanwhile Bui-ns himself was in straits, and had half-a-dozen designs in hand at once. Mossgiel was a failure ; he had resolved to deport him- self to the West Indies; he had made up his mind to print, and the Kilmarnock Edition was setting, when Jean was sent into exile. Worst of all, he seems to have been not very sure whether he loved or not. When he knew that he and she had not eluded the Inevitable, he wrote to James Smith that 'against two things — staying at home and owning her conjugally ' — he was ' fixed as fate.' ' The first,' he says, ' by heaven I will not do ! ' Then, in a burst of Don-Juanism — Don-Juanism of the kind that protests too much to be real — 'the last, by hell I will never do.' Follows a gush of senti- mentalism (to Smith), which is part nerves and part an attempt — as the run on the g's and the tv's shows — at literature : — ' A good God bless you, and make you happy, up to the warmest weeping wish of part- ing friendship.' And this is succeeded by a message to the poor, pregnant creature, of whom, but two lines before, he has sworn ' by hell ' that he will never make her honest : — ' If you see Jean, tell her 1 I take it that the paper was 'unluck}',' because it became a weapon in old Armour's hands, and was the means of inflicting on the writer the worst and the most painful experience of his life. At the same time there seems to be no doubt that it made Jean Mrs. Burns, so that, consciously or not, Auld (who probably had a strong objection to the marriage) was guilty of an illegal act in certifying Burns a bachelor. Burns, in fact, was completely justified in his anger with the Kirk and in the scorn with which he visited the tyranny of her ministers. 282 ROBERT BURNS I will meet her, so help me God in my hour of need.' This scrap is undated, but it must have been written before 17th February 1786, when he wrote thus to Richmond : — ' I am extremely happy with Smith ; he is the only friend I have now in Mauchline.' Well, he does meet Jean; and, his better nature getting the upper hand, the ' unlucky paper' is written. Then on the 20th March he writes thus to Muir : — ' I intend to have a gill between us or a mutchkin stoup,' for the reason that it ' will be a great comfort and consolation ' : — which seems to show that Jean has repudiated him some time be- tween the two letters. Before the 2nd April, on which day the Kirk-Session takes cognisance of the matter, Jean has gone to Paisley ; the ' unlucky paper' is cancelled (apparently about the 14th April, the names were cut out with a penknife) ; so that Don Juan finds himself plante-la, and being not really Don Juan — (as what sentimentalist could be ?) — he does not affect Don Juan any more. The prey has turned upon the hunter; the deserter becomes the deserted, the privilege of repudiation, ' by hell ' or otherwise, has passed to the other side. The man's pride, inordinate for a peasant, is cut to the quick ; and his unrivalled capacity for ' battering himself into an affection ' or a mood has a really notable opportunity for display. In love before, he is ten times more in love than ever; he feels his loss to desperation ; he becomes the disappointed lover — even the true-souled, generous, adoring victim of a jilt : — ( A jillet brak his heart at last That's owre the sea.' ROBERT BURNS 283 In effect, his position was sufficiently distracting. He had made oath that he would not marry Jean ; then he had practically married her ; then he found that nobody wanted her married to him — that, on the contrary, he was the most absolute ' detrimental ' in all Ayrshire ; when, of course, the marriage be- came the one thing that made his life worth living. He tried to persuade old Armour to think better of his resolve ; and, failing, ran ' nine parts and nine tenths out of ten stark staring mad.' Also he wrote the Lament, in which he told his sorrows to the moon x (duly addressing that satellite as ' O thou pale Orb '), and took her publicly into his confidence, in the beautiful language of Eighteenth Century English Poetry, and painted what is in the circumstances a really creditable picture of the effects upon a simple Bard of f a faithless woman's broken vow.' Further, he produced Despondency in the same elegant lingo ; and, in Despondency , having called for ' the closing tomb,' and pleasingly praised 'the Solitary's lot,' — ' Who, all-forgetting, all-forgot Within his humble cell — The cavern, wild with tangling roots — Sits o'er his newly gathered fruits, Beside his crystal well ! ' etc. — he addressed himself to Youth and Infancy in these affecting terms : — 1 Is it worth noting that, later, when he comes to sing of Mary Campbell, his confidant is no longer the Moon but the Morning Star ? 284 ROBERT BURNS ' O enviable early days, When dancing thoughtless Pleasure's maze, To care, to guilt unknown ! How ill exchang'd for riper times, To feel the follies or the crimes Of others, or my own ! Ye tiny elves that guiltless sport, Like linnets in the bush, Ye little know the ills ye court, When manhood is your wish ! The losses, the crosses That active man engage ; The fears all, the tears all Of dim declining Age ! ' 1 Moreover, he took occasion to refer to Jean (to David Brice; 12th June 1786) as 'poor, ill-advised, ungrateful Armour ' ; vowed that he could ' have no nearer idea of the place of eternal punishment ' than f what I have felt in my own breast on her 1 I cannot attach any great importance to these exercises in Poetic English. Burns wrote to a very different purpose when he wrote from his heart and in his native tongue : — ' Had we never loved sae kindly . . .' ' Of a' the airts the wind can blaw I dearly like the west ' :— and so on, and so on. Still, there can be no doubt that they mean something. At any rate they are designed to be impressive and 'fine' ; and probably the Bard believed in them to the extent to which he was satisfied with his achievement in what must cer- tainly have seemed to him real poetry. None of your Vernacular (that is), but downright, solid, unmistakable English Verse : verse which might stand beside the works of Beattie and Shenstone and Thomson and the 'elegantly melting Gray.' That life departed them long since is plain. But it is just as plain that they meant something to Burns, for (apparently) he took much pains with them, saw not their humorous aspect, and included them in his first (Kilmarnock) Volume. ROBERT BURNS 285 account ' ; and finally confessed himself to this pur- pose: — ' I have tried often to forget her: I have run into all kinds of dissipation and riot ... to drive her out of my head, but all in vain.' Long before this, however — as early, it would seem, as some time in March — his ' maddening passions, roused to tenfold fury,' having done all sorts of dreadful things, and then 'sunk into a lurid calm,' he had 'subsided into the time-settled sorrow of the sable widower,' and had lifted his ' grief-worn eye to look for — another wife.' In other words, he had pined for female society, and had embarked upon those famous love- passages with Highland Mary. Little that is positive is known of Mary Campbell except that she once possessed a copy of the Scriptures (now very piously preserved at Ayr), and that she is the subject of a fantasy, in bronze, at Dunoon. But to consider her story is, almost inevitably, to be forced back upon one of two conclusions: — either (1) she was something of a lightskirts ; or (2) she is a kind of Scottish Mrs. Harris. The theory in general acceptance — what is called the Episode Theory — is that she was 'an innocent and gentle Highland nursery-maid ' (thus, after Chambers, R. L. S.) 'in the service of a neigh- bouring family ' (Gavin Hamilton's) ; that she con- soled Burns — mats •pour le bon motif- — for Jean's de- sertion ; that they agreed to marry ; that, on her departure for the West to prepare for the event, ' Ayr, gurgling, kissed his pebbled shore,' and they exchanged vows and Bibles ; and that she died, of a malignant fever, some few months after her return to Greenock. Another identifies her (on Richmond's 286 ROBERT BURNS authority) with a serving-maid in Mauchline, who was the mistress of a Montgomerie, and had withal such a hold upon Burns that for a brief while he was crazy to make her his wife ; and some have thought that this may be the Maiy Campbell who, according to the Dundonald Session Records, fathered a child on one John Hay. This last hypothesis is, of course, most hateful to the puzzle-headed puritans who can- not, or will not, believe, despite the fact that the world has always teemed with Antonies, each of them mad for his peculiar Cleopatra, that Burns, particularly in his present straits, might very well have been enamoured of a gay girl to the point of marriage. So, for the consolation of these, there has been devised a third, according to which her name was either Mary Campbell or something un- known ; but, whatever she was called, she was so far and away the purest and sweetest of her sex — the one 'white rose,' in fact, which grew up among ' the passion flowers ' of the Bard's cai'eer — that she must, had she married him, have en- tirely ' rectified ' his character, and have trans- formed him into a pattern Kirk-of-Scotland puritan of the puritans. On the other hand, it has be- come obvious to some whole-hearted devotees of the Marian Ideal that a ' young person ' of this sort could scarce have been of so coming a habit as to skip with alacrity into Jean's old shoes, and — shutting her innocent eyes to the fact that Burns, a man notoriously at war with the Kirk and the seducer of two unmarried women, was at the same time at his wits' end for cash — consent to cast in her lot with his at a moment's notice and with ROBERT BURNS 287 never a sign from the family she was to enter. If she could do that, plainly she could not, except on strong positive testimony, be made to do duty as a white rose among passion-flowers ; or if, on some unknown and inenarrable hypothesis, she could, then, says one of the devout, 'the conduct of Burns was that of a scoundrel.' This is absurd ! So of late (1896-97) there has come into being a wish to believe that either Mary Campbell preceded Armour in the Bard's affections, or the Highland Lassie never existed at all, but was a creature of Burns's brain : an ideal of womanhood to which his thought ascended from the mire of this world — (the world of Ellisland, and Jean, and the children, and the songs in Johnson's Musetmi) — as Dante's to his Beatrice of dream. Given Burns's own habit and the habit of the Scots peasant woman, there is still no earthly reason for rejecting the Episode Theory — even were rejection possible — however seriously it reflect upon the morals of the parties con- cerned. But it is fair to add that the subject is both complicated and obscure. Burns's own references to his Highland Lassie are deliberately insignificant and vague : for once in his life he was reticent. His statement that she went home to prepare for their marriage is heavily discounted by the fact that he did not introduce her to his family as his betrothed, in nowise prepared for marriage on his own account, never dreamed, except in sporadic copies of verse, of taking her to the West Indies, and was all the while so desperately enamoured of Jean that not by any amount of self-indulgence could he rid his breast of her : by the fact, too, that, if his thought 288 ROBERT BURNS went back to the Highland Lassie in after years, his report of the journey is strongly tinctured with remorse. 1 Currie's statement is that ' the banks of Ayr formed the scene of youthful passions . . . the history of which it would be improper to reveal/ etc. Gilbert Burns, after noting that Nanie Fleming's charms were ' sexual ' — ' which indeed was the characteristic of the greater part of his (Robert's) mistresses ' — is careful, perhaps with an eye on the heroine of Thou Ling'ring Star, to record the state- ment that Robert, at least, ' was no platonic lover, whatever he might pretend or suppose of himself to the contrary.' There is Richmond's statement, as reported by Train. There is the Mary Campbell of the Dundonald Register. There is the certainty that relations there were between Burns and a Mary Campbell. There is the strong probability that Mary Campbell and the Highland Lassie were one and the same person. There is Burns' s own witness to the circumstance that they met and parted under extremely suspicious conditions. That, really, is all. Yet, on the strength of a romantic impulse on the part of Robert Chambers, the heroine-in-chief of Burns's story is not the loyal and patient soul whom he appreciated as the fittest to be his wife he 'd ever met : not the Jean who endured his affronts, and mothered his children (her own and another's), and took the rough and the smooth, 1 He sent Thou Lingering Star to Mrs. Dunlop in a letter dated 8th November 1789. In acknowledging it, the lady noted its remorseful cast, and hoped it didn't set forth a personal ex- perience. There is nothing to show that he gave her any par- ticulars, or essayed to disabuse her of the idea that remorse there well might be. ROBERT BURNS 289 the best and the worst of life with him, and wore his name for well-nigh forty years after his death as her sole title to regard. On the contrary, that heroine-in-chief is a girl of whom scarce anything definite is known, while what may be reasonably suspected of her, though natural and feminine enough, is so displeasing to some fanatics, that, for Burns's sake (not hers) they would like to mytho- logise her out of being ; or, at the least, to make her as arrant an impossibility as the tame, proper, figmentary Burns, the coinage of their own tame, proper brains, which they have done their best to substitute for the lewd, amazing peasant of genius, 1 the inspired faun, whose voice has gone ringing through the courts of Time these hundred years and more, and is far louder and far clearer now than when it first broke on the ear of man. Stevenson was an acute and delicate critic at many points; but he wrote like a novelist — like Thackeray, say, of Fielding and Sterne — when he wrote of Armour as a ' facile and empty-headed girl,' and insisted, still possessed by Chambers's vain imaginings, that she was first and last in love with another man. In truth the facility was on the other side. In 1784 Burns is willing to marry Betty Paton, and writes thus to Thomas Orr : — ' I am very glad Peggy [Thomson] is off my hand, as I am at present embarrassed enough without her.' In 1785 he is courting Jean Armour, and very early in 1786 Jean is in the family way, and ' by hell ' she shall never be his wife. But some time in March 1 'Peculiarly like nobody else' (R. B. toArnot, April 1786). VOL. IV. T 290 ROBERT BURNS Jean is sent to Paisley ; and the ' maddening passions/ etc., set to work ; and he can no more ' se consoler de son depart ' than Calypso could for that of Ulysses. So in a hand's turn he becomes the stricken deer, and, as we have seen, protests (to the Moon) that to marry Jean, and wear ' The promised father's tender name ' are his sole ambitions. As Jean does not return, however, he seeks (and finds) such comfort as he may in exchanging vows and Bibles and what Chamfort called ' fantaisies ' with Mary Campbell. On the 12th- 13th May he writes The Court of Equity — a task the strangest con- ceivable for a lover, whether rejoicing or distraught. On the 14th ' Ayr gurgling kisses his pebbled shore,' and ' The flowers spring wanton to be pressed,' and Highland Mary leaves for the West to make these famous preparations. On the 15th May he dates (at least) the Epistle to a Young Friend : — ' The sacred lowe o' weel-placed love Luxuriantly indulge it/ etc. :— and, as for some time past, he is still the gallant, howbeit in jest, of Betty Miller : till on the 9th June ' poor ill-advised Armour ' returns to Mauchline ; and on the 12th he writes that 'for all her part in a certain black affair' he 'still loves her to distraction/ and, with a view to forgetting her has ' run into all kinds of dissipation and riot . . . but in vain.' On the 2Sth June he appears before ' the Poacher Court/ acknowledges paternity, and is ' promised a certificate as a single man ' : on condition that he do penance before the congregation on three suc- cessive Sundays. On the 9th July, the occasion ROBERT BURNS 2<)1 of his first appearance, he has ' a foolish hankering fondness' for Jean, but, calling on her and being put to the door, he remarks that she does not ' show that penitence that might have been expected '; so, on the 22nd, he executes a deed by which he makes over all his property to the ' wee image of his bonie Betty,' to the exclusion of whatever might come of his affair with the recusant. Then, on the 30th (old Armour having, meanwhile, got a warrant against him, and sent him into hiding l ), he adjures Richmond — (who, he knows, will ' pour an execration' on Jean's head) — to ' spare the poor, ill-advised girl for my sake ' ; and on the 14th August he calls on Heaven to < bless the Sex/ for that ' I feel there is still happiness for me among them.' Against this panorama of tumult and variety and adventure, enlarged in Edinburgh, and enriched at Ellisland and in Dumfries, there are to set the years of simple abnegation, magnanimity, and devotion with which the 'facile and empty- headed girl' repaid the husband of her choice. The conclusion is obvious. The Novelist turned Critic is still the Novelist. Consciously or not, he develops preferences, for, consciously or not, he must still create. 2 Stevenson's preferences were 1 No doubt ho retired on information sent by Jean. 2 Thus Stevenson, who himself liked 'dressing a part' (so to speak), was persuaded that Burns did likewise, and accepted bodily that absurd, fantastic story (told by two Englishmen), in which the Bard, in a fox-skin cap and an enormous coat, and girt with a Highland broadsword, is seen angling from a Nithside rock. Jean denied it, and said that Robert (who hated field-sports, as we know) never angled in his life. But the Novelist was roused ; and all that was ignored. 292 ROBERT BURNS with Rab Mossgiel. And the result was a grave — but not, I hope, a lasting — injustice to an excellent and very womanly woman and a model wife. 1 As to Highland Mary, one of two conclusions : (1) Either she was a paragon; or (2) she was not. In the first case, her story has yet to be written, and written on evidence that is positive and irre- futable. In the second, the bronze at Dunoon bears abiding witness to the existence (at a certain time) of what can only be described as a national delusion. VI By this time the end of Mauchline, and of much besides, was nearer than Burns knew. Probably sent to press in the May of 1786, the Kilmarnock Volume was published at the end of July. 2 Most of, if not 1 On the 3rd September Jean lay in of twins. They were presently taken by their respective grandmothers, to whom, I doubt not, they gave great i'oy: as in that and other stages of society the appearance of the third generation, whether its right to exist be legal or not, does always. Burns announced the event as only Burns could, by sending Nature's Law : — ' Kind Nature's care had given him share Large of the flaming current,' etc.: — to Gavin Hamilton ; a ' God bless the little dears ' ; with a snatch of indecent song, to Richmond, and a really heartfelt and affect- ing bit of prose on the subject of paternity to Robert Muir. 2 One effect of its publication was to secure him the friendship of Mrs. Dunlop (ii. 352-3). It is evident from this lady's letters that her interest in him could scarce have been warmer had he been her son. She prized his correspondence as beyond rubies, and as a rule he was slower to reply than she (once, being hurt by his silence, she told him she wouldn't write again till he asked ROBERT BURNS 293 all, the numbers contained in it were probably familiar to the countryside. Some had certainly been received with 'a roar of applause'; Burns, who was not the man to hide his light under a bushel (his temperament was too radiant and too vigorous for that), was given to multiplying his verses in Ms. copies for friends; he had been 'read into fame ' by Aiken the lawyer : so that Poems, Chiefly in the Scottish Dialect was, in a sense, as ' well advertised ' as book could be. Its triumph was not less instant than well-deserved : l the first issue, six hundred copies strong, was exhausted in a month ('tis said that not one could be spared for Mossgiel). But Burns himself, according to himself, and he was ever punctiliously exact and scrupulous on the score of money, was but £20 in her, and, failing to draw him, within a week she is found begging his pardon for her petulance). She made him many gifts — apparently in money and in kind — gifts at New Year and other times, and accepted gifts from him (once he sent her a keg of old brandy). Her influence made ever for decency, and it may well have been on her remonstrances, which were strong, that he finally resolved to remove some of the coarser phrases in his earlier editions. Her last (extant) letter is dated 11th January 1795. For some unexplained reasons she ceased from writing several months before the January of 1796. It may have been that she heard of him as often in drink, or that she was told of the affair at Woodley Park. In any case she esteemed him so highly, and admired him so lavishly, that 'tis quite impossible to believe the breach in the correspondence due to any fault of hers. 1 'Old and young,' says Heron, 'high and low, grave and gay, learned or ignorant, all were alike delighted, agitated, transported. I was at that time resident in Galloway, contiguous to Ayrshire : and I can well remember, how that even the plough-boys and maid-servants would have gladly bestowed the wages which they earned the most hardly, and which they wanted to purchase necessary clothing, if they might but secure the works of Burns.' 294 ROBERT BURNS pocket by it ; the Kilmarnock printer declined to strike off a second impression, with additions, unless he got the price of the paper (£27) in advance ; and for some time it seemed that there was nothing but Jamaica for the writer, Local Bard and Local Hero though he were : so that he looked to have sailed in mid- August, and again on the 1st September, and at some indeterminate date had ' conveyed his chest thus far on the road to Greenock,' and written that solemn and moving song — far and away the best, I think, and the sincerest thing he left in English — The Gloomy Night is Gathering Fast. It was to be the 'last effort' of his 'Muse in Caledonia.' But, for one or another reason, his departure was ever deferred ; and, though on the 30th October (some ten days, it is surmised, after the death of Mary Campbell), he was still writing that, ' ance to the Indies he was wonted,' he 'd certainly contrive to ' mak' the best o' life Wi' some sweet elf,' on the 18th November, 'I am thinking for my Edinburgh expedition on Monday or Tuesday come s'ennight.' In effect, an ' Edinburgh expedition ' was natural and inevitable. Ballantine of Ayr is said to have suggested the idea of such an adventure ; Gilbert and the family are said to have applauded it. But as early as the 4th September the excellent Black- lock — (in ' a letter to a friend of mine which over- threw all my schemes') — had called — 'for the sake of the young man ' — for a second edition, ' more numerous than the former ' : inasmuch as ' it appears certain that its intrinsic merit, and the exertions of the author's friends, might give it a more universal circulation than anything of the kind which has ROBERT BURNS 295 been published within my memory.' Thus Black- lock ; and the ' friend of mine,' which was Lawrie, the minister of Loudoun, had communicated Black- lock's letter to the person most concerned in Blacklock's suggestion. Bold, proud, intelligent au •possible, strongly possessed too (so he says, and so I believe) by the genius of paternity, Burns the Man, who had a very becoming opinion of Burns the Bard, and could fairly appreciate that worthy's merits, must certainly have seen that in Edinburgh he had many chances of succeeding at the very point where the Kilmarnock printer failed him. I do not doubt, either, that he was tired of being the Local Poet, the Local Satirist, the Local Wit, the Local Lothario (even), and eager to essay himself on another and a vaster stage than Mauch- line ; for, if he hadn't been thus tired and thus eager, he wouldn't have been Robert Burns. The fighting spirit, the genius of emulation, is so strong in us all that a man of temperament and brains must assert himself, and get accepted at his own (or another) valuation, exactly as a cock must crow. And I love to believe that Burns, being immitigably of this metal, entered upon his adven- ture — (27th November : on a borrowed nag, with not much money, a letter of introduction to Dal- rymple of Orangefield, and a visiting list consisting entirely in Dugald Stewart and Richmond the lawyer's clerk) — with the joyous heart and the stiff neck of one who knows himself a man among men, and whose chief ambition is to ' drink delight of battle with his peers ' — if he can find them. He reached the capital on the 28th November, 296 ROBERT BURNS and was hospitably entertained by Richmond — to the extent, indeed, of a bedfellow's share in the clerk's one little room in Baxter's Place, Lawn- market. Through Dalrymple of Orangefield he got access to Lord Glencairn and others : among them Harry Erskine, Dean of Faculty, and that curious, irascible, pompous ass, the Earl of Buchan, and Creech the publisher, who had been Glencairn's tutor, and who advertised the Edinburgh Edition on the 14th December. He was everywhere re- ceived as he merited, and he made such admirable use of his vogue that, five days before Creech's advertisement was printed, he could tell his friend and patron, Gavin Hamilton, that he was rapidly qualifying for the position of Tenth Worthy and Eighth Wise Man of the World. He saw everybody worth seeing, and talked with everybody worth talk- ing to ; he was made welcome by ' heavenly Burnett ' and her frolic Grace of Gordon, and welcome by the ribald, scholai-ly, hard-drinking wits and jinkers of the Crochallan Fencibles, for whose use and edification he made the unique and precious collec- tion now called The Merry Muses of Caledonia; he moved and bore himself as easily at Dugald Stewart's as in Baxter's Place, in Creech's shop, with Henry Mackenzie and Gregory and Blair, as at that extra- ordinary meeting of the St Andrew's Lodge, where, at the Grand Master's bidding, the Brethren assem- bled drank the health of ' Caledonia and Caledonia's Bard — Brother Burns ' : a toast received with 'multi- plied honours and repeated acclamations.' To look at, ' he was like a farmer dressed to dine with the laird'; his manners were 'rustic, not clownish'; he ROBERT BURNS 297 had 'a sort of dignified plainness and simplicity.' Then, ' his address to females was always extremely deferential, and always ' — this on the authority of the Duchess of Gordon — ' with a turn to the pathetic or humorous, which engaged their attention particu- larly.' For the rest, 'I never saw a man in company with his superiors in station and information more perfectly free from either the reality or the affecta- tion of embarrassment.' Thus, long afterwards, Sir Walter, who noted also, boy as he was, ' the strong expression of sense and shrewdness in all his linea- ments/ and who, long afterwards, had never seen such an eye as Burns's 'in a human head, though I have seen the most distinguished men ' — (Byron among them; and Byron's eye was one of Byron's points) — 'of my time.' It is not won- derful, perhaps, that Burns, with his abounding temperament, his puissant charm, his potency in talk, his rare gifts of eye and voice, 1 should have strongly affected Edinburgh Society, brilliant in its elements and distinguished in its effect as it was. There has been no Burns since Burns ; or history would pretty certainly have repeated itself. What is really wonderful is the way in which Burns kept his head in Edinburgh Society, and stood prepared for the inevitable reaction. Through all the ' thick, strong, stupefying incense smoke ' (and there was certainly a very great deal of it), he held a steady eye upon his future. He saw most clearly that the 1 Thus Maria Riddell : — 'His voice alone could improve upon the magic of his eye. Sonorous, replete with the finest modula- tions,' etc. It will be remembered that children used to speak of Byron as ' the gentleman with the beautiful voice. 298 ROBERT BURNS life of a nine-days' wonder is at most nine days, and that now was his time or never. But if he ex- pected preferment, he was neither extravagantly elated in anticipation, nor unduly depressed by dis- appointment ; and, for all his self-consciousness — ( f And God had given his share ') — he was not too platonic to disdain the favours of at least one servant- girl (he was arrested, August 1787, on a warrant In meditatione fugce), nor too punctilious to make love to ' a Lothian farmer's daughter, a very pretty girl, whom I 've almost persuaded to accompany me to the West Country, should I ever return/ etc., nor too philosophical not to regret his Jean, and reflect (in this very letter to Gavin Hamilton) that he 'd never ' meet so delicious an armful again.' In the long-run his magnanimity suffered a certain change. The peasant at work scarce ever goes wrong; but abroad and idle he is easily spoiled, and soon. Edinburgh was a triumph for Burns ; but it was also a misfortune. It was a centre of con- viviality — a city of clubs and talk and good-fellow- ship, a city of harlotry and high jinks, a city (above all) of drink : — ' Whare couthy cliiels at e'enin meet, Their bizzin craigs and mou's to weet : An' blythely gar auld Care gae by Wi' blinket and wi' bleering eye ' : — a dangerous place for a peasant to be at large in, especially a peasant of the conditions and the stamp of Burns. He was young, he was buckishly given, and he was — Burns. He had, as certain numbers in The Merry Muses witness, an entirely admirable ROBERT BURNS 299 talent of a kind much favoured by our liberal ancestors. To hear him talk was ever a privilege ; while to hear him make such use as he might of this peculiar capacity cannot but have constituted an unique experience. After all, a gift 's a gift, and a man must use the gifts he has. No reasonable being can question that Burns used this one of his. 1 In those days he could scarce be buckish — or even popular — and do other. Even in the country, says Heron, in his loose yet lofty way, ' the 1 This is noted neither in praise nor in dispraise. It is noted to show that Burns was essentially a man of his time : as how, peasant of genius that he was, could he be anything else ? Our fathers loved sculduddery, and Burns, who came from Carrick — where, as Lockhart has remarked, the Vernacular was spoken with peculiar gaiety and vigour — was the best gifted of them all in this respect by virtue of his genius, his turn of mind, his peasanthood, and his wonderful capacity for talk. Josiah Walker notes of Burns that his conversation was 'not more licentious' than the conversation heard at the tables of the great ; Lockhart regrets that he can give but few of Burns's mots, for the reason that the most of those preserved and handed down were unquotable. It was a trick of the time, and long after — (re- member Colonel Newcome's indignant retreat before old Costigan) — so that Lord Cork of The Bumper Toast, and Captain Morris at Carlton House and Burns among the Crochallan Fencibles are but expressions of the same fashion in humour, the same tendency in the human mind to apprehend and rejoice in the farce of sex. I do not know that Burns and M 'Queen of Braxfield (Stevenson's Weir of Hermiston) ever met. But it was said of M'Queen that he had never read anything but sculduddery and law ; and to Ramsay of Auchtertyre, in whom Sir Walter found some elements of Monkbarns, the two men seemed cast in the same mould. Burns, in any case, was a man of the later Eighteenth Century (he sent one of his best-known facetice to Graham of Fintry, with a view to correcting some illiberal report about his politics) ; and to take him out of it, and essay to make him a smug, decent, Late- Victorian journalist is, as I think, to essay a task at once dis- creditable in aim and impossible of execution. 300 ROBERT BURNS votaries of intemperate joys, with persons to whom he was recommended by licentious wit . . . had begun to fasten on him, and to seduce him to em- bellish the gross pleasures of their looser hours with the charms of his wit and fancy.' These temptations — (he was known, be it i - emembered, for the ribald of The Fornicator and The Court of Equity as well as for the poet of the Mountain Daisy and the Saturday Night) — he was by no means incapable of putting by. Mr. Arthur Bruce, indeed, 'a gentleman of great worth and discernment,' assured Heron that he had ' seen the Poet steadily resist such solicitations and allurements to convivial enjoyment, as scarcely any other person could have withstood.' But — thus this author : intelligent, not unfriendly on the whole, on the whole competent — 'the bucks of Edinburgh ac- complished . . . that in which the boors of Ayrshire 1 had failed. After residing some months in Edinburgh he began to estrange himself, not altogether, but in some measure, from the society of his graver friends. . . . He suffered himself to be surrounded by a race of miserable beings who were proud to tell that they had been in company with Burns, and had seen Burns as loose and as foolish as themselves.' 2 One result of this condescension was this : always the 1 This appears to be a polite description, by a staunch (though drunken) Churchman, of those desperate spirits, Gavin Hamilton and Robert Aiken. 2 I give all this for what it is worth. Heron himself was some- thing of a wastrel. Yet he had a clerical habit and a clerical bias which made him easily censorious in the case of so hardened and so militant an anti-cleric as the Bard. He was personally acquainted, however, with that hero ; and his little biography (17W) is neither unintelligent nor ill-written. ROBERT BURNS 301 best man in the room, ' the cock of the company/ as Heron puts it, ' he began to contract something of new arrogance in conversation ' ; till in the long- run 'he could scarcely refrain from indulging in similar freedom and dictatorial decision of talk, even in the presence of persons 1 who could less patiently endure his presumption.' Heron's detail is vague — not to say indefinite ; his effect may be misleading. But, as I said, the peasant at large — the peasant without hard work to keep him straight — must, almost of necessity, run to waste. And it is plain that, treading thus closely on the heels of ' the dissipation and riot,' the 'mason-meetings, drinking- matches, and other mischief,' of the year before, the distractions and the triumphs of Edinburgh continued the work which the mistakes and follies of Dumfries were to finish ten years after. At last, however, the First Edinburgh Edition appeared (21st April 1787). The issue ran to 2S00 copies, and 1500 of these were subscribed in advance. What Burns got for it is matter of doubt. Creech informed Heron that it was £1100 — which is a plain untruth ; Chambers says £500 ; Burns himself told Mrs. Dunlop (25th March 1789) that he expected to clear some £440 to £450. (Other impressions were called for in the course of the year, but the Bard had sold his copyright, and had no interest in them.) Whatever the amount, 2 Creech 1 Heron himself, no doubt. He 'had the tongues,' and thought himself the better man. 2 At the instancing of Henry Mackenzie, Creech paid Burns (23rd April 1787) a hundred guineas for the copyright of the Poems, besides subscribing five hundred copies. The Caledonian Hunt subscribed another hundred ; and Hums sent seventy to 302 ROBERT BURNS was a slow paymaster ; and, as Edinburgh was bad for Burns, and Creech was responsible for Burns's detention in Edinburgh, it is impossible not to regret that Burns had not another publisher. Burns in effect, his Second Edition once published, had nothing to do but pocket his receipts, 1 and be gone. This, Ballantine for ' a proper person ' in Ayr, and wrote from Dunse (17th Ma} - ) to acknowledge the receipt, from Pattison, the Paisley bookseller, of 'Twenty-two pounds, seven shillings sterling, payment in full, after carriage deducted for ninety copies ' more. Twenty-four copies went to the Earl and Countess of Glencairn, twenty to Prentice of Conington Mains, forty to Muir of Kilmar- nock, twenty-one to Her Grace of Gordon, forty-two to the Earl of Eglintoun, and a certain number to the Scots Benedictionaries at Maryborough and Ratisbon, and the Scots Colleges at Douay, Paris, and Valladolid. The subscription price was five, the price to non-subscribers six, shillings: the extra shilling being (Burns to Pattison, ut sup.) 'Creech's profit.' 1 Heron ' had reason to believe that he had consumed a much larger proportion of these gains than prudence could approve; while he superintended the impression, paid his court to his patrons, and wasted the full payment of the subscription money.' In effect, it is hard to see how, coming to Edinburgh with next to nothing in his pocket (the £20 from "Wilson could not have gone very far), he could otherwise have lived. It would have been natural enough for him to have accepted gratuities, for the Age of Patronage was still afoot, and relief in this kind would have come as easily (to say the least) to the 'ploughing poet,' howbeit he was the proudest and in some respects the most punctilious of men, as to any other. I find it hard to believe that there were none. But there is no record of any ; and a letter (unpublished) of this period in acknowledgment of a gift of money from Mrs. Dunlop is almost painful in its embarrass- ment of gratitude and discomfort. On the whole, I take it that, however cheaply he lived in Edinburgh, he must of necessity have had to discount his profits, though not to anything like the extent suggested by Heron. Moreover, it is like enough that he spent a certain amount upon his Tours, and it is certain that Mossgiel was a dead loss to him. ROBERT BURNS 303 however, was what Creech could not let him do : so that he went and came, and came and went, and it was not until the March of 1789 that the two men squared accounts. 1 The Edition floated, comes a jaunt to the Border (begun 5th May) with Robert Ainslie. Then, by the 9th June, Burns is back at Mauchline, a much richer and a vastly more important person than he left it : able to lend his brother £180; reconciled, too, with Jean and her people, but disgusted, or feigning himself disgusted (for, after the repudia- tion, he is ever the superior and the injured party in regard to Jean), with the 'mean, servile compliance' with which his advances are met. Follows a tour to the West Highlands, which seems to be largely an occasion for drink and talk ; and in July you find him back at Mauchline, boasting how he, 'an old hawk at the sport,' has brought 'a certain lady' — (unknown) — 'from her aerial towerings, pop, down at my foot, like Corporal Trim's hat ' : despite which Jean is presently with child by him for the second time. In August he is at Edinburgh, intent on a settlement with Creech, but on the 25th he starts for the Highland tour with his friend Nicol. 2 After a couple of excursions more — 1 Of the work he did about this time the best is to be found in the Haggis and the Epistles to Creech and the Guidwife of "Wauchope House. What is very much more to the purpose is that he made Johnson's acquaintance, and at once began con- tributing to the Musical Museum. 2 Heron describes Nicol as a man who ' in vigour of intellect, and in wild yet generous impetuosity of passion, remarkably resembled , , . Burns ' ; who ' by the most unwearied and extra- ordinary professional toil, in the midst of as persevering dissipa- 304 ROBERT BURNS one to Ayrshire, to look at certain holdings — he is resolved on quitting Edinburgh, settlement or no settlement, to farm or go to the Indies, as circum- stances shall dictate. But it is written that his life shall have another disputable episode and the world an immortal scrap of song : — ' Had we never loved sae kindly, Had we never loved sae blindly, Never met or never parted, We had ne'er been broken-hearted.' So in the beginning of December he falls in with Mrs. M'Lehose ; he instantly proposes to ' cultivate her friendship with the enthusiasm of religion'; and the two are languishing in Arcady in the twinkling of a cupid's wing. She was a handsome, womanly creature — ' of a somewhat voluptuous style of beauty ' : a style the Bard appreciated — lively but devout, extremely sen- timental yet inexorably dutiful : a grass widow with children — nine times in ten a lasting safeguard — tion . . . won and accumulated an honourable and sufficient competence'; and who died of 'a jaundice, with a complication of other complaints, the effects of long-continued intemperance.' Burns admired Nicol, named a son after him, and immortalised him as the 'Willie' who 'breVd a peck o' maut.' He had a generous heart and a brutal temper, with plenty of brains, a great contempt for custom and the Kirk, and what Lockhart calls 'a rapturous admiration of Burns's genius.' The violent vulgarity of his behaviour at Castle Gordon is typical of the man. He bought a little property not far from Ellisland, and, what with pride and vanity and republican independence (so called) and an immitigable turn for liquor, was certainly as bad a neighbour as the Bard could possibly have had. ROBERT BURNS 305 and the strictest notions of propriety — a good enough defence for a time ; but young (she was the Bard's own age), clever, 'of a poetical fabric of mind,' and all the rest. The upsetting of a hackney coach dis- abled Burns from calling on her for some weeks. But he wrote her letters, and she answered them ; and he was Sylvander, and she signed herself Clarinda ; and they addressed each other in verse as well as prose ; and she said it could never be ; and he said that at least he must know her heart was his ; and Religion was her 'balm in every woe'; and he gave her his ideas of Deity; and, when they could meet, Clarinda was ever afraid lest she had let Sylvander go too far ; and Sylvander, for his part, was monstrous eloquent about ' Almighty Love ' — (he was some- times dreadfully like his favourite Man of Feeling) — and was 'ready to hang himself about ' a young Edinburgh widow.' Widow she was not ; but her husband, who cared not a snap of the fingers for her, was away in the West Indies ; and it may perhaps have suited her lover — who never, so far as is known, was trained to the compromises and the obsequiencies of adultery — to soothe his con- science by making believe that the affair was at the most a simple everyday amour. Clarinda was of another make. In the prime of life, deserted, sentimental, a tangle of simple instincts and as simple pieties, she had the natural woman's desire for a lover and the religious woman's resolve to keep that lover's passion within bounds. It is scarce questioned that she succeeded : though there is a legend that a certain gallant and insinuating little lyric : — VOL. iv. u 306 ROBERT BURNS ' O May, thy morn was ne'er sae sweet As the mirk night o' December For sparkling was the rosy wine, And secret was the chamber ! And dear was she I winna name But I will aye remember ! ' — commemorates, not only their final meeting (De- cember 6th, 1791) but also, the triumph of the Bard. 1 In any event she was plainly an excellent creature, bent on keeping herself honest and her lover straight ; and it is impossible to read her letters to Sylvander without a respect, a certain admiration even, which have never been awakened yet by the study of Sylvander's letters to her. For Sylvander's point of view, as M'Lehose was still alive, and an open intrigue with a married woman would have been ruin, only one inference is pos- sible : that he longed for the shepherd's hour to strike for the chime's sake only ; so that, when he thought of his future, as he must have done anxiously and often, he cannot ever have thought 1 Both Ae Fond Kiss and O May, thy Morn were sent to Clarinda after the final parting ; but the legend is ail-too obviously an effect of the very common human sentiment in deference to which so many novels end happily. For the rest, Sir Walter Scott wrote thus on the fly-leaf of a copy of the very scarce Belfast Edition (1806) of the Letters Addressed to Clarinda by Robert Burns, now at Abbotsford: — 'Clarinda was a Mrs. Meiklehose, wife of a person in the "West Indies, from whom she lived separate but without any blemish, I believe, ou her reputa- tion. I don't wonder that the Bard changed her "thrice unhappy name " for the classical sound of Clarinda. She was a relative of my friend the late Lord Craig, at whose house I have seen her, old, charmless and devote. There was no scandal at- tached to her philandering with the Bard, though the Lady ran risques, for Burns was anything but platouic in his amours,' etc. ROBERT BURNS 307 of it as Clarinda's, even though in a moment of peculiar exaltation he swore to keep single till that wretch, the wicked husband, died. 1 Very early in 1788, Jean— brought, she also, some time in the preceding summer 'pop, down at my feet, like Corporal Trim's hat 5 — was expelled her parents' house and took refuge at Tarbolton Mill. There Burns found her on his return, and thence he removed her to a house in ' Mauchline toun/ to the particular joy, a short while after, of Saunders Tait :— c The wives they up their coats did kilt, And through the streets so clean did stilt, Some at the door fell wi' a pelt Maist broke their leg, To see the Hen, poor wanton jilt ! Lay her fourth egg.' 2 Follows what is perhaps the most perplexing sequence of circumstances in a perplexing life. To Clarinda, who knew of the affair with Armour, pitied 1 M'Lehose outlived him many years. 2 Some stanzas later in B — rns's Hen Clockin in Mauchline, Saunders (who has been likening Jean to a ship) thus notes her state : — ' Now she is sailing in the Downs, Calls at the ports of finest towns, To buy bed hangings and galloons'' : and comments with fury on the fact that she 's got, not only ' twa 2>acks o' human leather,' but also ' A fine cap and peacock feather, And wi't she's douce, With a grand besom made of heather, To sweep her house.' It is worth noting that he winds up his lampoon by accusing the gossips at the lying-in of talking scandal of the rankest and reading The Hohj Fair \ 308 ROBERT BURNS the victim — (this does not mean that she wished her married to Burns) — and had sped her shepherd on his homeward way with ' twa wee sarkies ' for the victim's little boy : a mistress, be it remembered, to whom he had written (14th February) in such terms as these : — ' I admire you, I love you as a woman beyond any one in the circle of creation ' : — he wrote, a few days after his arrival at Mauch- line, that he had ' this morning ' (23rd February 178S) ' called for a certain woman/ and been 'dis- gusted with her,' so that he could not ' endure her.' Though his heart ' smote him for the profanity,' he sought to compare the two ; and ' 'twas setting the expiring glimmer of a farthing taper beside the cloudless glory of the meridian sun.' ' Here,' the Old Hawk continues, ' here was tasteless insipidity, vulgarity of soul, and mercenary fawning. There, polished good sense, Heaven-born genius, and the most generous, the most delicate, the most tender passion.' This to the contrary, it needs no great knowledge of life, and still less of Burns and Armour, to divine what happened ; and it needs as little of Burns at this point in his career to see why he ended his confession to Clarinda thus : — ' I have done with her, and she with me.' Eight days after this (3rd March 17S8), in a letter to Ainslie, some parts of it too ' curious ' for a Victorian page, he tells a different story. 1 'Jean,' says he, 1 The letter is best described as a Crochallanisrn — as something written by one Fencible for the edification of another Fencible, and dealing with its subject in right Fencible style and from the correct Fencible point of view. I am afraid that, like the afore- said letter to Clarinda, it was designed as what Ainslie himself, then unrcgenerate, might have called 'a d d bite.' ROBERT BURNS 309 ' I found banished like a martyr — forlorn, desti- tute, and friendless ; all for the good old cause. I have reconciled her to her fate : I have reconciled her to her mother : * I have taken her a room : I have taken her to my arms : I have given her a mahogany bed : I have given her a guinea ; and I have '- — but here Scott Douglas's garbling begins, and Burns's inditing ends ; and the original must be read, or the reader will never wholly understand what manner of man the writer was. Then comes an avowal so disconcerting that I cannot choose but disbelieve it, and conclude that it was made for some special purpose. ' But/ says the Old Hawk, ' but, as I always am, on every occasion — I have been prudent and cautious to an astounding degree ; I swore her, privately and solemnly, never to attempt any claim on me as a husband, even though anybody should persuade her she had such a claim, which she had not, 2 neither during my life nor after my death. She did all this like a good girl, and . . .' The rest is unquotable. At first consideration, the spectacle of the Bard keeping 'the wish'd, the trysted hour,' with a settled purpose of ' prudence and caution ' in his mind, and as it were the materials for swearing in his pocket, in no wise makes for enlightenment. On reflection, however, it becomes evident that Burns wrote thus to Ainslie, whom he had asked to call on Clarinda in his absence, simply that Ainslie might quote her his report of a second (and an entirely superfluous) act of 1 Was reconciliation possible without a second offer of marriage ? I doubt it. 2 This is literally true : the ' unlucky paper ' was destroyed. 310 ROBERT BURNS repudiation on Jean's part : * to the end, as I cannot doubt, of using the fact for all it was worth, when he himself appeared upon the scene. That this is at least a possible theory is shown by the terms in which he tells (7th March) the story of his recon- ciliation to Brown : 2 — ' I found Jean with her cargo very well laid in. ... I have turned her into a convenient harbour where she may lie snug till she unload, and have taken the command myself, not ostensibly, but for a time in secret.' This can only mean that he purposes to marry the girl. For all that, though, he still has hopes of a practical issue to his Edinburgh affair ; for in his next letter (writ the same day) to Clarinda, who has reproached him for silence, and at the same time owned that she counts 'all things (Heaven excepted) but lost, that I may win and keep you,' ' Was it not blasphemy, then,' he asks, ' against your own charms and against my feelings, to suppose that a short fortnight could abate my passion ! ' With a vast deal more to the same purpose. Three days after, he starts again for Edinburgh, and plunges deeper in desire than ever for his 'dearest angel' (so he calls her on the 17th March), the ' dearest partner of his soul ' (four days after). ' Oh Clarinda' (same date), 'what do I owe to Heaven for blessing me with such 1 There was no need of oaths from Jean : her lover had had his bachelor's certificate in his pocket for months. And such swearing as there was — was it not all on the other side ? 2 It is important to note the difference in manner and tone and suggestion between Burns to Brown and Burns to Ainslie. Burns writes to Brown as friend to friend; to Ainslie as Fencible to Bencible— much, in fact, as Swiveller, President of the Glorious Apollos, to Chuckstcr, Vice of the same sublime Society. ROBERT BURNS 311 a piece of exalted excellence as you ! ' He must leave for Ellisland,w7/ Mauchline, on the 24th; and ' Will you open,' he asks, ' with satisfaction and delight a letter' — ('twas all to be limited to letters soon) — ' from a man who loves, who has loved you, and who will love you to death, through death, and for ever ! ' They are to meet the next night, and he is to watch — (right Arcady, this !) — her lighted window : — f 'Tis the star that guides me to Paradise.' And for him ' the great relish to all is — that Honor — that Innocence — that Religion, are the witnesses and guarantees of our happiness.' Follows a bit of the Bible adapted to their peculiar case ; and with an c Adieu, Clarinda ! I am going to remember you in my prayers,' the Old Hawk stoops to his perch for the night. Nothing is known of the last engage- ment ; but apparently the citadel remains inviolate, for the leaguer is raised next day, and the besieger draws off his forces by way of Glasgow. Thence he writes to Brown (26th March) that ' these eight days ' he has been 'positively crazed.' And by the 7th April he has made Jean Armour his wife. An amazing-love story ? True. But that love- story it was — that Burns was first and last enamoured of the woman he made his wife — is shown, I think, by the fact that to all intents and purposes he married her twice over. As for Clarinda, well . . . ! Clarinda complicates and exhilarates the interest to this extent at least : that if words mean anything, and the Bard be judged by those he wrote, the Bard, had Clarinda been indeed a widow, might at a given moment have found himself incapable of making Jean an honest woman. And had he 312 ROBERT BURNS followed his fancy, not his heart ? How had the two Arcadians fared ? 'Tis for some future Chambers to divine and say. VII Meanwhile he had taken Ellisland, a farm in Dumfriesshire, of Miller of Dalswinton : with an allowance from his landlord, a worthy and generous man, of £300, for a new steading and outhouses. His marriage at last made formal and public (it seems to have been celebrated by Gavin Hamilton), on the 5th August 1788 the bride and bridegroom appeared before the Session, acknowledged its irregularity, demanded its ' solemn confirmation/ were sentenced to be rebuked, were 'solemnly engaged to adhere faithfully to one another as husband and wife all the days of their life,' and were finally ' absolved from any scandal ' on the old account. But the new steading was long a-building. It was not till the 6th November that Burns and Jean set up their rest in Dumfriesshire ; and even so, they had to go, not to their own farmhouse — (it was not ready for them till the August of 1789) — but, to a place called 1 The Isle,' about a mile away from it. Burns had taken Ellisland on the advice of a friendly expert -, 1 1 'A lease was granted to the poetical farmer' (thus Heron, who knew the country) ' at the annual rent which his own friends declared that the due cultivation of his farm might easily enable him to pa)-.' But those friends, being Ayrshiremen, 'were little acquainted with the soil, with the manures, with the markets, with the dairies, with the modes of improvement in Dumfries- shire ' ; they had estimated his rental at Ayrshire rates ; so that, 'contrary to his landlord's intention,' he must pay more for Ellisland than Ellisland was worth. According to the elder Cunningham, Ellisland was a poet's choice, not a farmer's. ROBERT BURNS 313 but he had had his doubts about the wisdom of ' euid auld Glen's' decision, and these were soon justified. For a time, however, he stuck to his work like a man : conversing much, it would seem, in his leisure with his neighbour, Glenriddell, and others, whose honoured guest he was, making and vamping songs, paying some heed to national and local politics, and finding time for letters not a few — among them a long and elaborate criticism on some worth- less verses by that crazy creature, Helen Maria Williams. 1 But by the end of July 1789 he had resolved to turn his holding into a dairy farm to be run by Jean and his sisters, and to take up his Gaugership 2 in earnest; and on the 10th of August, some brief while after the completion of The Kirk's Alaiin, he learned from Graham of Fintry (whom he had met, in 1787, at the Duke of Athole's, on his Second Highland Tour) that he was appointed Exciseman for that district of Dumfriesshire in which Ellisland is situate. The work was hard, for he had charge of ten parishes, and must ride two hundred miles a week to get his duty 1 Burns was not only a reader himself : he was ever the cause of reading in others. One of his occupations at Ellisland was the foundation and the management of a book-club. He took the keenest interest in the work, was especially careful in selection, and, according to Glenriddell, did whatever must be done himself. Like his father, he believed in education ; and, like his father, he did his best to educate his kind by all the means which lay to his hand. He held that the peasant could not but be the better for good reading ; and he exerted himself to the utmost to give the peasant what seemed to him the best that could be had. That he did so is as honourable a circumstance as is found in his career. 2 By Glencairn's interest he had been appointed to a place in the Excise as early as 1787. 314 ROBERT BURNS done. But by the beginning of December, ' I have found,' he writes, ' the Excise business go a great deal smoother with me than I expected ' ; and that he 'sometimes met the Muses,' as he jogged through the Nithsdale hills, is shown by the fact that The Whistle, the excellent verses on Captain Grose (with whom he made acquaintance at Glenriddell's table), and Thou Ling ring Star, with Willie Brew'd, that best of drinking-songs, and The Five Carlines (a notable piece of mimicry, if no more), all be- long to the period of his probation, and were all written before the end of the year. Plainly, too, he was an officer at once humane and vigilant : since, while it is told of him that he could always wink when staring would mean blank ruin to some old unchartered alewife (say), his first year's ' decreet ' — his share, that is, of the fines imposed upon his information — was worth some fifty or sixty pounds. Exercise and the open air are held good for a man's health; yet in the winter of 1789-90 this man suffered cruelly from his old ailment. As for verse, the Elegy on Matthew Henderson and Tarn o' Shanter (1790) seem a poor year's output for the poet of those wonderful months at Mossariel. But work for Johnson was going steadily on ; so that the results of these barren-looking times are in a sort the best known of his titles to greatness and to fame. Thus he strove, and faltered, and achieved till 1791, by the beginning of which year he had realised that Ellisland was impossible ; that he could not afford his rent, which (so he told Mrs. Dunlop) was raised that year by .£20, and must depend entirely on his Excisemanship : when he asked for service in a port, ROBERT BURNS 315 and, by Mrs. Dunlop's interest, was transferred to ' a vacant side-walk ' in Dumfries town. Thither, his landlord setting no manner of impediment in his way, and his crops and gear having been well and profitably sold, 1 he removed himself in December, and established his family in a little house in the Wee Vennel. 'Tis a circumstance to note that, beginning at Ellisland as the Burns of Of A' the Avis, some time before the end he was the Burns of Yestreen I Had a Pint o Wine. 2 That is, he married Jean in the April of 1788, and some two years after he got Anne Park with child. Jean bore him his second son (in wedlock) the 9th April 1791 ; and Anne Park had been delivered of a daughter by him ten days before (31st March). Some say that she died in childbed ; some that she lived to marry a soldier. Nobody knows, and, apparently, nobody cares, what became of her. She was no ' white rose ' (with a legend). She was scarce a 1 The standing crops were ' rouped ' in the last week of August. They realised ' a guinea an acre above the average.' But such a riot of drunkenness was 'hardly ever seen in this country.' See Burns to Sloan (Scott Douglas, v. 394) for details and for a confession : — 'You will easily guess how I enjoyed the scene ; as I was no farther over than you used to see me ' : — which take you back to the Burns of The Jolly Beggars. The stock and gear 'were not sold till August" (Scott Douglas, v. 392). 'We did not come empty-handed to Dumfries,' Mrs. Burns told M'Diarmid. ' The Ellisland sale was a very good one. A cow in her first calf brought eighteen guineas, and the purchaser never rued his bargain. Two other cows brought good prices. They had been presented by Mrs. Dunlop of Dunlop.' 2 I have read somewhere that the first quatrain — the flower of the song — is old ; but I cannot verify the description. 316 ROBERT BURNS ' passion flower ' ; x and though the Bard himself thought the ditty he made upon her one of his best, the 'episode' in which she played a principal part is not regarded with any special interest by his biographers. She was a tavern waitress, and he was the Bard ; and she pleased him ; and she lived, or died — it matters not which ; and there 's an end on't. The true interest consists, perhaps, in the magnanimity of Jean, who, lying-in a few days after the interloper, was somehow moved to receive the interloper's child, and to suckle it with her own. It is further to note that Anne Park is the last of Burns's mistresses who has a name. That she was not the last in fact you gather from Currie ; 2 but this one is innominate. So far as is 1 Chambers declares that, if Jean had not been away in Ayr- shire, there would have been no Elizabeth Burns : which is surely the boldest apology for a husband's lapse, at the same time that it is the frankest admission of this particular husband's inability to cleave to his wife in absence, that has ever been offered to an admiring world. Scott Douglas knocks it on the head, and shows that Chambers's valour is greater than Chambers's sense of history, by proving that neither in the June nor the July of 1790 could Jean have been away. 2 He has been roundly and deservedly reproved for the manner and the circumstances in which he published his report — (of an 'accidental complaint')— which, by the way, was started by Heron. For another piece of scandal, whether published or not I do not know — that at Dumfries the Bard walked openly with harlots — it is, of course, entirely unauthenticated ; and I here refer to it but for the purpose of pointing out that, if it were true, the fact of such familiarities, however horrifying to respect- able Dumfries, would sit lightly enough both on Burns the peasant and on Burns the poet of The Jolly Beggars and My Auntie Jean Held to the Shore : that, if it were true, the memory of Burns exchanging terms with the light-heels of the port were simply one to set beside the memory of Burton rejoicing in the watermen at the bridge-foot at Oxford. ROBERT BURNS 317 known, the goddesses of the years to come, the Chlorises and Marias and Jessies : — ' 'Tis sweeter for thee despairing Than aught in the world beside ' : — are all platonic in practice, if not in idea. The recipe for song-making was soon to be this : — * I put myself in the regimen of adoring a fine woman, and in proportion to the adorability of her charms, in proportion you' — Thomson — c are delighted with my verses.' It was a mistake, so far as the world is concerned. But Burns made it ; and by the time it was made, he probably knew no better. In his last years, indeed, the irresponsible Faunus of Mossgiel and Edinburgh becomes a kind of sentimental sultan, who changes, or rewards, his slaves of dream with a magnificence which, edi- fying or not, is at least amusing. Thus, you find him designing the publication of a book of songs, with portraits of the beauties by whom they are inspired ; Maria Riddell is expelled his lyrical harem as with a fork, because she has offended him ; Jean Lorimer, she of ' the lint-white locks ' — (' Bonie lassie, artless lassie ! ') — is the Chloris of ditty after ditty, till of a sudden Chloris is a disgusting name, and ' what you once mentioned of "flaxen locks" is just' — so just, indeed, that ' they cannot enter into an elegant description of beauty.' 1 This he discovers in the February 1 Is it not all the Peasant and his womankind ? The peasant's women are his equals. The sentiment of chivalry is not included in his heritage ; and he treats his associates in that lot of penury and toil which is his birthright as the ' predominant partner,' the breadwinner, the provider of children, may : he 318 ROBERT BURNS of 1796, in the July of which year he dies. And he keeps up his trick of throwing the lyric hand- kerchief till the end. All through his last illness he is tenderly solicitous about his wife, be it re- membered ; yet the deathbed songs for Jessie Lewars are the best of those closing years. In the result, then, Ellisland was a mistake : not so much because it was a farm, as because it was not Burns's own. 1 He was essentially and unalterably a peasant; and as a peasant-poet, a crofter taking down the best verses ever dictated by the Vernacular Muse, he might, one would like to think, what with work in the fields, and work at his desk, and the strong, persuasive inducements of home, have attained to length of days and peace of mind and the achievement of still greater fame, at the same time that he realised the ideal which he has sublimated in some famous lines : — e To mak' a happy fireside clime For weans and wife, That 's the true pathos and sublime Of human life.' Plainly, though, it could not be. He had too much genius, too much temperament, for it to be : with too much interest in life, which to him, however diverse and however variable his moods, meant, punishes, that is, and he rewards. It is unlikely that this was Burns's practice with Jean ; but assuredly it was his practice with the ' fine women ' of his dreams. 1 He woidd have liked the life well enough, he says, had he tilled his own acres. But to take care of another man's, at the cost, too, of a horrible and ever-recurring charge called rent — that was the devil ! ROBERT BURNS 319 largely, if not wholly, Wine and Woman and Song. Also, he had been too hardly used, too desperately driven in his youth, and too splendidly petted and pampered in his manhood, to endure with constancy the work by which the tenant-farmer has to earn his bread. He had seen his father fail at Mount Oliphant and Lochlie ; and he had shared his brother's failure at Mossgiel. By no fault of his own, but owing to the circumstance that he had taken a holding out of which he could not make his rent, he failed himself at Ellisland ; and though, in his case, there was small risk of 'a. factor's snash,' he was infinitely too honest and too proud to take un- due advantage of another man's bounty : so, to make ends meet, he turned gauger, and took charge of ten parishes, and rode two hundred miles a week in all weathers. It was a thing he 'd always wanted to do, and, at the time he took to doing it, it was the only thing that could profitably be done by him. But his misfortune in having to do it was none the less for that. It took him from his home, it unsettled his better habits, it threw him back on Edinburgh and his triumphing experience as an idler and a Bard, it led him into temptation by divers ways. And when Pan, his goat-foot father — Pan, whom he featured so closely, in his great gift of merriment, his joy in life, his puissant appetites, his innate and never-failing humanity — would whistle on him from the thicket, he could not often stop his ears to the call. He was the most brilliant and the most popular figure in the district ; he loved good-fellowship ; he needed applause ; he rejoiced in the proof of his own 320 ROBERT BURNS pre-eminence in talk — rejoiced, too, in the tran- scendentalising effect of liquor upon the talker, 1 as in the positive result of his name and fame, his prestance and his personality, upon adoring women. Is it not plain that Dumfries was inevitable ? Or, rather, is it not plain that, first and last, the life was one logical, irrefragable sequence of prepara- tions for the death ? That Mount Oliphant and Lochlie led irresistibly to Mauchline, as Mauchline to Edinburgh, and Edinburgh to Ellisland, and Ellisland to the house in the Mill Vennel ? And is not the lesson of it all that there is none so un- fortunate as the misplaced Titan — the man too great for his circumstances ? Speaking broadly, I can call none to mind who, in strength and genius and temperament, presents so close a general likeness to Burns as Mirabeau. Born a noble, and given an opportunity commensurate with himself, Burns would certainly have done such work as Mirabeau's, and done it at least as well. Born a Scots peasant, Mirabeau must, as certainly, have lived the life and died the death of Burns. In truth, it is only the fortune of war that we remember the one by his conduct of the Revolution, which called his highest capacities into action, while we turn to the other for his verses, which are the outcome (so Maria Riddell thought, and was not alone in thinking) of by no means his strongest gift. 1 He complained (to Clarinda) long ere this of the 'savage hospitality ' he could not choose hut accept. And, in effect, he had the ill-luck to start drinking at a time when whisky, fire- new from the Highlands, was the fashionable tipple, and was fast superseding ale. Born a generation earlier, when ale and claret were the staple comforters, he had stood a better chance. ROBERT BURNS 321 VIII Whatever the sequel, it may fairly be said for Ellisland that Burns and Jean were happy there, and that it saw the birth of Tarn d Shanter and the perfecting, in the contributions to Johnson's Museum, of the Vernacular Song. 1 The last, as we know, was Burns' s work ; but he had assistants, and they did him yeoman service. He worked in song exactly as he worked in satire and the rest — on familiar, old-established bases ; but he did so to a very much greater extent than in satire and the rest, and with a great deal more of help and inspiration from with- out. I have said that he contributed nothing to Vernacular Poetry except himself, but, his contribu- tion apart, was purely Scots-Traditional ; and this is especially true of his treatment of the Vernacular Song. What he found ready to his hand was, in brief, his country's lyric life. Scotland had had singers before him ; and they, nameless now and forgotten save as factors in the sum of his achievement, had sung of life and the experiences of life, the tragedy of death and defeat, the farce and the romance of sex, the rapture and the fun of 1 I say nothing of the numbers sent to Thomson. Very many are copied from the Museum, and the others need not here be discussed with even an approach to particularity. A point to note in connexion with the contributions both to the Museum and to Scottish Airs is that Burns was honourably and intensely proud of them. He regarded them as work done in the service of the Scotland whose 'own inspired Bard' he was, and neither asked money, nor would take it, for them. To think that he was writ- ing for Thomson to the very end is to have at least one pleasant memory of Dumfries. VOL. IV. X 322 ROBERT BURNS battle and drink, with sincerity always, and often, very often, with rich or rich-rank humour. Among them they had observed and realised a little world of circumstance and character ; among them they had developed the folk-song, had fixed its type, had cast it into the rhythms which best fitted its aspira- tions, had equipped it with all manner of situations and refrains, and, above all, had possessed it of a great number of true and taking lyrical ideas. Any one who has tried to write a song will agree with me, when I say that a lyrical idea — by which I mean a rhythm, a burden, and a drift — once found, the song writes itself. It writes itself easily or with difficulty, it writes itself well or ill ; but in the end it writes itself. In this matter of lyrical ideas Burns was fortunate beyond any of Apollo's sons. He had no need to quest for them : there they lay ready to his hand, and he had but to work his will with them. That they were there explains the wonderful variety of his humours, his effects, and his themes : that he could live and work up to so many among them is proof positive and enduring of the apprehensiveness of his humanity, his gift of right, far-ranging sympathy. It is certain that, had he not been, they had long since passed out of practical life into the Chelsea Hospital of some antiquarian publication. But it is also certain that, had they not been there for him to take and despoil and use, he would not have been — he could not have been — the master-lyrist we know. What he found was of quite extraordinary worth to him ; what he added was himself, and his addition made the life of his find perennial. But, ROBERT BURNS 323 much as are the touch of genius and the stamp of art, they are not everything. The best of many nameless singers lives in Burns' s songs; but that Burns lives so intense a lyric life is largely due to the fact that he took to himself, and made his own, the lyrical experience, the lyrical longing, the lyrical invention, the lyrical possibilities of many nameless singers. He was the last and the greatest of them all ; but he could not have been the great- est by so very much as he seems, had these innomi- nates not been, nor could his songs have been so far-wandered as they are, nor so long-lived as they must be, had these innominates not lived their lyric life before him. In other terms, the atmosphere, the style, the tone, the realistic method and design, 1 Avith much of the material and the humanity, of Burns's songs are inherited. Again and again his forefathers find him in lyrical ideas, in whose absence there must certainly — there cannot but have been — 1 As I have said (see ante, pp. 278-9, Note 1), realism is the dis- tinguishing note of the Vernacular School ; and the folk-singers are not less curious in detail than their literary associates and forebears. Even that long sob of pain, 0, Wall/, Waly, has its elements of everyday life and circumstance : — 'My love was clad in the black velvet, And I myself in cramasie' : — its references to St. Anton's Well and Arthur's Seat and the sheets that 'sail ne'er be pressed by me.' Cf., too, that wonder- ful little achievement in romance, The Two, Corbies: — ' Ye '11 sit on his white hause-bane, And I '11 pykc out his bonie blue een, Wi' ae lock o' his gowden hair "We'll theck our nest when it grows bare.' Cf., too, in other styles, Toddlin Hamc and Ellibauks and Elli- bracs and — well, any folk-song you care to try ! 324 ROBERT BURNS a blank in his work. They are his best models, and he does not always surpass them, as he is sometimes not even their equal. 1 And if his effect along certain lines and in certain specified directions be so intense and enduring as it is, the reason is that they are a hundred strong behind him, and that he has selected from each and all of them that which was lyrical and incorruptible. A peasant like them- selves, he knew them as none else could ever know. He sympathised from within with their ambitions, their fancies, their ideals, their derisions, even as he was master, and something more, of their methods. And, while it is fair to say that what is best in them is sublimated and glorified by him, it is also fair to say that, but for them, he could never have approved himself the most exquisite artist in folk- song the world has seen. It has been complained that, thus much of his claim to be original removed, he must henceforth shine in the lyrical heaven with a certain loss of magnitude and his splendour something dimmed. And this is so far true that the Burns of fact differs, and differs considerably and at many points, from 1 Cf. O, Waly, Waly and The Twa Corbies and Helen of Kirkconnel ; with Toddlin Hamc, which Burns thought ' the first bottle-song in the world, ' the old sets of A Cock-Laird, Fu' Cadgic and Fee Him, Father, and, in yet another genre, 0, Were My Love. Even in The Merry Muses Burns, who wrote a particular class of song with admirable gust and spirit, does no better work than some of the innominates — the poets of Erroch Brae and Johnie Scott and Jenny M'Cra/ta, for example; while his redaction of Ellibanks and Ellibraes — ('an old free-spoken song which cele- brates this locality would be enough in itself to bring the poet twenty miles out of his way to see it') — is in no wise superior to the original. ROBERT BURNS 325 the Burns of legend. The one is an effect of cer- tain long-lived, inexorable causes ; the other — that 'formidable rival of the Almighty/ who, deriving from nobody, and appearing from nowhere, does in ten years the work of half-a-dozen centuries — is an impossible superstition, as it were a Scottish Mumbo- Jumbo. The one comes, naturally and inevitably, at the time appointed, to an appointed end ; but by no conceivable operation in the accomplishing of human destiny could the other have so much as begun to be. And, after all, however poignant the regret, and however wide-eyed and resentful the amaze- ment of those who esteem a man's work on the same terms as they Avoulcl a spider's, and value it in proportion as it does, or does not, come out of his own belly, enough remains to Burns to keep him easily first in the first flight of singers in the Vernacular, and to secure him, outside the Ver- nacular, the fame of an unique artist. I have said that, as I believe, his genius was at once imi- tative and emulous ; and, so far as the Vernacular Song is concerned, to turn the pages of our Third Volume is to see that, speaking broadly, his function was not origination but treatment, and that in treatment it is that the finer qualities of his en- dowment are best expressed and displayed. His measures are high-handed enough ; but they are mostly justified. 1 He never boggles at appropriation, 2 1 Not always. See Vol. iii. (p. 9G and Note) for an attempt to improve upon Ayton (or another), and ante (p. 42 and Note) for another to improve npon Carew. Both are failures ; but only one is in the Vernacular, and neither owns a Vernacular original. 2 Besides the folk-singers and the nameless lyrists of the song-books, he is found pilfering from Sedley, Garrick, Lloyd, 326 ROBERT BURNS so that some of his songs are the oddest con- ceivable mixture of Burns, Burns's original, and somebody Burns has pillaged. Take, for instance, that arch and fresh and charming thing, For the Sake of Somebody. In the first place, ' Somebody ' comes to Burns as a Jacobite catchword ; and in the next, the lyrical idea is found in a poor enough botch by Allan Ramsay: — ' For the sake of Somebody, For the sake of Somebody, I could wake a winter's night For the sake of Somebody.' This is pretty certainly older than The Tea-Table Miscellany, and has nothing whatever to do with the verses which the later minstrel has tagged it withal. But it is a right lyrical idea, and in the long-run a lyrical idea is a song. So thinks Burns ; and you have but to compare the two sets to see the differ- ence between master and journeyman at a glance. The old, squalid, huckstering little comedy of court- ship : — c First we '11 buckle, then we '11 tell, Let her flyte and syne come to . . . I '11 slip hame and wash my feet, An' steal on linens fair and clean, Syne at the trysting place we '11 meet, To do but what my dame has done ': — Ramsay, Fergusson, Theobald, Carew, Mayne, Dodsle}-, and Sir Robert Ay ton (or another). See also our Notes (Vol. iii. ) on Duncan Davison, on Landlady, Count the Lawin, on Sweetest May, on The Winter it is Past, on We 're A' Nodclin, to name but these ; and, as a further illustratian of his method, note that, according to Scott Douglas (ms. annotation), the first three lines of Gat Ye Me belong to old song No. i., the next five to Burns, and the last eight to old song No. ii. ROBERT BURNS 327 gives place to a thing to-day as comfortable to the ear and as telling to the heart as when Burns vamped it from Ramsay's vamp from somebody unknown. What is further to note is that not all the latest vamp is Burns plus Ramsay plus Innominate i. plus Jacob te catchword : inasmuch as the first line of Stanza ii. is conveyed from an owlish lover in The Tea-Table Miscellany : — ' Ye powers that preside over virtuous love. ' Thus some solemn poetaster a good half-century at lease ere Burns ; and for over a hundred years ' Ye powers that smile on virtuous love ' has lived as pure Burns, and as pure Burns is now passed intJ the language. Yet, despite the pilferings and the hints, it were as idle to pretend that Somebody, as it stands, is not Burns, as it were foolish to assert tliat Burns would have written Somebody without a certain unknown ancestor. Another flash of illustra- tion comes from It Was A' For Our Rightfu King: with i:s third stanza lifted clean from Mally Stewart, and set in a jewel of Burnsian gold, especially contrived and chased to set it off and make the lyric best of it. A third example is found in A Red, Red Rose, which, as we have shown (iii. 143 and Note), is a mosaic of rather beggarly scraps of English verse : just as Jonson's peerless Drink To Me Only With Thine Eijes is a mosaic contrived in scraps of conceited Greek prose. It is exquisitely done, of course ; but, the beggarly scraps of verse away, could it ever have been done at all ? And An Id Lang Syne ? It passes for pure Burns ; but was the phrase itself — the phrase which by his time had 328 ROBERT BURNS rooted itself in the very vitals of the Vernacular — was the phrase itself, I say, not priceless to him ? Something or nothing may be due to Ramsay for his telling demonstration of the way in wliich it should not be used as a refrain. But what cf that older maker and the line which Burns himself thought worth repeating, and which the world re- joices, and will long rejoice, to repeat with Burns : — ' Should auld acquaintance be forgot, An' never thoclit upon ? ' Is there nothing of his cadence, no taste of his sentiment, no smack of his lyrical idea, no memory (to say the least) of his burden : — ' On old long syne, my jo, On old long syne, That thou canst never once reflect On old long syne ' : — in the later masterpiece ? To say f No ' were surely to betray criticism. And Ay Wauhin, — should we, could we ever, have had it, had there beer, nobody but Burns to start the tune and invent the lyrical idea ? f O, wat, wat, O, wat and weary ! Sleep I can get nane For thinkin o' my dearie. ' A' the night I wake, A' the day I weary, Sleep I can get nane For thinkin o' my dearie.' Thus, it may be, some broken man, in hiding among the wet hags; some moss-trooper, drenched and ROBERT BURNS 329 prowling, with a shirtful of sore bones ! Whoever he was, and whatever his calling and condition, he had at least one lyrical impulse, he has his part in a masterpiece by Burns, and his part is no small one. I might multiply examples, and pile Pelion upon Ossa of proof. But to do so were simply to repeat the Bibliographical and the Notes to our Third Volume; and in this place I shall be better employed in pointing out that these double conceptions (so to speak), these achievements in lyrical collaboration, are for the most part the best known and the best liked of Burns's songs, and are, moreover, those among Burns's songs which show Burns the song- smith at his finest. The truth is that he wrote two lyric styles: (l) the style of the Eighteenth Cen- tury Song-Books, 1 which is a bad one, and in which 1 He was trained in it from the first. In early youth he carried an English song-book about with him — wore it in his breeches- pocket, so to speak. This was The Lark : ' Containing a Collec- tion of above Four Hundred and Seventy Celebrated English and Scotch Songs, None of which are contain'd in the other Collec- tions of the same size, call'd The Syren and The Nightingale. With a Curious and Copious Alphabetical Glossary for Explain- ing the Scotch words. London. Printed (1746) for John Osborn at the Golden Ball in Pater Noster Row.' 'Tis a fat little book, and as multifarious a collection of Restoration and — especially — post-Restoration songs as one could wish to have. Antiquated political squibs ; ballads, as Clievy Chace, with Gilderoy, the Queen's Old Soldier, and Katherine Hayes ; a number of in- decencies from D'Urfey's Pills; Scots folk-songs, like Toddlin Hame and The Ewe Bughts, and O, Waly, Waly and John Ochiltree and The Blithesome Bridal ; current English ditties like Old Sir Simon and Phillida Flouts Me ; a song of a Begging Soldier, whose vaunt, ' "With my rags upon my bum,' is echoed in The Jolly Beggars ; much Allan Ramsay; with scattered examples of Dryden, Dorset, Congreve, Alexander Scott, Brome, Prior, Wycherley, Rochester, Farquhar, Cibber — even Skelton ; and a 330 ROBERT BURNS he could be as vulgar, or as frigid, or as tame, as very much smaller men ; x and (2) the style of the Verna- cular Folk-Song, which he handled with that under- standing and that mastery of means and ends which stamp the artist. To consider his experiments in the first is to scrape acquaintance with Clarinda, Mistress of My Soul, and Turn Again, Thou Fair Eliza, and On A Bank of Flowers, and Sensibility, How Charming, and Castle Gordon, and A Big-Bellied Bottle, and Strathallan's Lament, and Raving Winds Around Her Blowing, and How Pleasant the Banks, and A Rosebud By My Farly Walk," and many a thing besides, which, were it not known for the work of a wilderness of commonplace ditties about love and drink. On the whole, an interesting collection. Particularly if you take it as an element in the education of the lyric Burns. 1 Cf. Their Groves of Sweet Myrtle (Vol. iii. 252-3 and Note), among other things : — ' The slave's spicy forests and gold-bubbling fountains The brave Caledonian views wi' disdain ; He wanders as free as the winds of his mountains, Save Love's willing fetters — the chains o' his Jean. Such achievements in what Mr. Meredith calls ' the Bathetic,' are less infrequent in Burns than could be wished. 2 It is understood that Scots Wha Hac is an essay in the Vernacular (I gather, by the way, that it is one of the two or three pieces by 'the Immortal Exciseman nurtured ayont the Tweed' which are most popular in England). But, even so, one has but to contrast it with 7s There for Honest Poverty, to recognise that in the one the writer's technical and lyrical mastery is complete, while in the other it is merely academic — academic as the lyrical and technical mastery of (say) Rule Britannia. Now, 7s There for Honest Poverty is caique" on a certain disreputable folk-song ; while Scots Wlia Hac is for all practical purposes the work of an Eighteenth Century Scotsman writing in English, and now and then propitiating the fiery and watchful Genius of Caledonia by spelling a word as it is spelt in the Vernacular. ROBERT BURNS 331 great poet, would long since have gone down into the limbo that gapes for would-be art. In the other are all the little masterpieces by which Burns the lyrist is remembered. He had a lead in The Silver Tassie x and in Auld Lang Syne, in A Man 's a Man and Duncan Davison, in A Waukrife Minnie and Duncan Gray and Finlay, in I Hae a Wife and It Was A' For Our Rightfu King and A Red, Red Rose, in Macpherson s Lament, and Ay Waulcin, 0, and Somebody, and Whistle, and I '11 Come to You — in all, or very nearly all, the numbers which make his lyrical bequest as it were a little park apart — an unique retreat of rocks and sylvan corners and heathy spaces, with an abundance of wildings, and here and there a hawthorn brake where, to a sound of running water, the Eternal Shepherd tells his tale — in the spacious and smiling demesne of English literature. And my contention — that it is to Burns the artist in folk-song that we must turn for thorough contentment — is proved to the hilt by those lyrics in the Vernacular for which, so far as we know, he found no hint elsewhere, and in which, so far as we know, he expressed himself and none besides. He had no suggestions, it seems (but I would not like to swear), no catchwords, no lyrical material for Tarn Glen and Of A' the Airts, for Willie Brewed and Bonie Doon, for Last May a Bran> Wooer and 0, Wert Thou in the Cauld Blast, 2 1 ' The first four lines are old,' he says, ' the rest is mine.' And, in effect, the quatrain is unique in his work. 2 It is oddly and amusingly illustrative of Burns's trick of mosaic that a line in this charming song . ' The brightest jewel in my crown ' : — comes bodily from — The Court of Equity ! 332 ROBERT BURNS and Mary Morison — to name no more. But, if they be directly referable to nobody but himself, they feature his whole ancestry. They are folk-songs writ by a peasant of genius, who was a rare and special artist; and they show that the closer he cleaved to folk-models, and the fuller and stronger his possession by the folk-influence, the more of the immortal Burns is there to-day. Suggested or not, the songs of Burns were devised and written by a peasant, devising and writing for peasants. The emotions they deal withal are the simplest, the most elemental, in the human list, and are figured in a style so vivid and direct as to be classic in its kind. Romance there is none in them, for there was none in Burns l — 'tis the sole point, perhaps, at which he was out of touch with the unrenowned generations whose flower and crown he was. But of reality, which could best and soonest 1 None, or so little that if his Jacobitisms seem romantic, it is only by contrast with the realities in which they occur. The interest of even It Was A' For Our Bightfu' King is centred in the vamper's sympathy with, not the romantic situation : — ' He turned him richt and round about Upon the Irish shore,' etc. : — but with that living, breathing, palpitating 'actuality ' of senti- ment developed in both hero and heroine by the disastrous turn of circumstances : — ■ ' Now a' is done that man can do, And a' is done in vain ' : — and the position created by those circumstances at the end : — ' But I hae parted from my love Never to meet again ' : — which places this lyric somewhere near the very top of homely and familiar song. ROBERT BURNS 333 bring them home to the class in which their genius was developed, and to which themselves were addressed : — ' Grain de muse qui git invisible Au fond de leur (5ternite ' : — there is enough to keep them sweet while the Ver- nacular is read. They are for all, or nearly all, the peasant's trades and crafts : so that the gangrel tinker shares them with the spinner at her wheel, the soldier with the ploughman, the Aveaver with the gardener and the tailor and the herd. Morals, experiences, needs, love and liquor, the rejoicing vigour and unrest of youth, the placid content of age — there is scarce anything he can endure which is not brilliantly, and (above all) sincerely and veraciously, set forth in them. That old-world Scotland, whose last and greatest expression was Burns, either has passed or is fast passing away. In language, manners, morals, ideals, religion, sub- stance, capacity, the theory and practice of life — in all these the country of Burns has changed : in some, has changed ' beyond report, thought, or belief.' But that much of her which was known to her Poet is with us still, and is with us in these songs. For man and woman change not, but endure for ever : so that what was truly said a thousand years ago comes home as truth to-day, and will go home as truth when to-day is a thousand years behind. To the making of these things there went the great and generous humanity of Burns, with the humanity, less great but still generous and sincere, of those unknowns, whose namelessness was ever a regret to 334 ROBERT BURNS him. 1 They are art in their kind. And there is no reason why this e little Valclusa fountain ' should lack pilgrims, or run dry, for centuries. 2 IX I purpose to deal with the Dumfries period with all possible brevity. The story is a story of de- cadence ; and, even if it were told in detail, would tell us nothing of Burns that we have not already heard or are not ail-too well prepared to learn. In a little town, where everybody 's known 1 'Are you not quite vexed to think that these men of genius, for such they certainly were, who composed our fine Scottish lyrics, should be unknown? It has given me many a heartache ' (R. B. to Thomson, 19th November 1794). And see his Journal for a more heart-felt recognition still. 2 They lived not long the limited life of Johnson's Musical Museum and Thomson's Scottish Airs. Thus, in a collection of North of England chap-books (c. 1810-20) which I owe to the kind- ness of the Earl of Crawford, I find at least two Burns 'Songsters' — (they are the same, but one is called ' The Ayrshire Bard's Song- ster,' the other something else) — both 'Printed by J. Marshall in the Old Fleshmarket, ' Newcastle. In a third — a miscellany, this one — is Scots Wlia Hue, 'As sung by Mr. Braham at the Newcastle Theatre Royal' (Carlyle thought this famous lyric should be 'sung by the throat of the whirlwind ' ; but it had better luck than that). The great Jew tenor further warbled a couple of stanzas of The Winter It is Past at a concert in the same city, when Miss Stephens was responsible for Charlie He 's My Darling. In other chaps Burns is found rubbing shoulders with Moore and Campbell and Tom Dibdin, and a hundred others, among them Allan Ramsay. In these Of A' the Airts is sandwiched between The Twopenny Postman and the Wedding at Ballyporecn, while Somebody is kept in countenance by Paddy Carey and The Wounded Hussar. The most popular, perhaps, are Of A' the Airts, and Scots Wha Hae, and Willie Brcw'd ; but On a Bank of Flowers lacks not admirers. ROBERT BURNS 335 to everybody, there is ever an infinite deal of scandal ; and Burns was too reckless and too con- spicuous not to become a peculiar cock-shy for the scandalmongers of Dumfries. In a little town, especially if it be a kind of provincial centre, there must of necessity be many people with not much to do besides talking and drinking; and Burns was ever too careless of consequences, as well as ever too resolute to make the most of the fleeting hour — it may be, too, was by this time too princely and too habitual a boon-companion — to refrain from drink and talk when drink and talk were to be had. In the sequel, also, it would seem that that old jealousy of his betters (to use the ancient phrase) had come to be a more disturbing influence than it had ever been before. He knew, none better, that, however brilliantly the poet had succeeded, the man was so far a failure as an investment, that, with bad health and a growing family, he had nothing to look forward to but promotion in the Excise ; and his dis- content with the practical outcome of his ambition and the working result of his fame was certainly not soothed, and may very well have been exacerbated, by his rather noisy sympathy with the leading principles of the French Revolution. He was too fearless and too proud to dissemble that sympathy, Avhich was presently (1794) to find expression in one of his most vigorous and telling lyrics ; he was, pei'haps, too powerful a talker not to exaggerate its quality and volume ; and, though it was common, in the beginning at least, to many Scotsmen, its expression got him, as was inevitable, into trouble with his superiors, and in the long-run was pretty 336 ROBERT BURNS certainly intensified, to the point at which resentment is translated into terms of indiscretion and impru- dence, by the reflection, whether just or not, 1 that it had damaged his chances of promotion. That he fought against temptation is as plain as that he proved incapable of triumph, and that, as Carlyle has wisely and humanely noted, the best for him, certain necessary conditions being impossible, was to die. Syme, 2 who knew and loved him, said that he was ' burnt to a cinder ' ere Death took him ; we can see for ourselves that the Burns of the Kilmarnock Volume and the good things in the Museum had 1 It seems to have been unjust. Pitt, though he loved the poetry of Burns, did nothing for him — was probably, indeed, too busy to think of doing anything once the page was read and the bottle done ; and Fox, to whom Burns looked for advancement, was ever out of office, and could do nothing, even had he been minded to do something, which we are not told that he was. But the Bard had a sure stay in Graham of Fintry ; and, though Glencairn was dead, and he was sometimes reprimanded (ct pour cause), there is no reason to believe that he would have missed preferment had he lived to be open to it. 2 It has been said, I believe, that Syme's evidence is worthless, inasmuch as it tends to discredit Burns. But one eye-witness, however dull and prejudiced (and Syme was neither one nor other), is worth a wilderness of sentimental historians ; and Syme's phrase, howbeit it is so picturesque that it conveys what is, perhaps, too violent an impression, probably means no more than that Burns had damaged himself with drink. That much Burns admitted time and again ; and Currie — who cannot but have got his information from Maxwell — remarks that for over a year bef ore the end ' there was an evident decline of our Poet's personal appearance, and, though his appetite continued unim- paired, he was himself sensible that his constitution was sinking.' It was all, the doctor thought, the effect of alcohol on a difficult digestion and a sensitive nervous system; and, though he was something of a fanatic in this matter, I see no reason, as he wau also an honest man, to question his diagnosis. ROBERT BURNS 337 ceased to be some time before the end ; there is evidence that some time before the end he was neither a sober companion nor a self-respecting husband. And the reflection is not to be put by, that he left the world at the right moment for himself and for his fame. There is small doubt that the report of his mis- conduct was at best unkindly framed ; there is none that certain among his apologists have gone a very great deal too far in the opposite direction. We may credit Findlater, for instance, but it is impossible, having any knowledge of the man, to believe in the kind of Exciseman-Saint of Gray : impeccable in all the relations of life and never the worse for liquor : even as it is impossible to believe in the bourgeois Burns of the latest apotheosis. As Lockhart says, the truth lies somewhere between the two extremes ; and one is glad to agree with Lockhart. Even so, however, tradition, as reported by friends and enemies alike, runs stronger in his disfavour than it does the other way. 1 And, though we know that party feeling ran high in Dumfries, and that Burns — with his stiff neck, and his notable distinction, and his absolute gift of speech — did certainly damn 1 ' We are raising a subscription (horrid word) ' — (thus Sir Walter, to Morritt, loth January 1814) — 'for a monument to Burns, an honour long delayed, perhaps till some parts of his character were forgotten by those among whom he lived.' This was written within twenty years of Burns's death : when the grievance of the Revolution was lost in the shadow cast by the tremendous presence of Napoleon. And, if it be urged that Burns's offending against Toryism must have been rank indeed to be recalled thus bitterly and thus late, it may be retorted that by no possibility can it have been an hundredth part so indecent as VOL. IV. y 338 ROBERT BURNS himself in the eyes of many by what, in the circumstances, must have seemed a suicidal intem- perance of feeling and expression, we know also that, once extremely popular, he was presently cut by Dumfries society ; that after a time his reputa- tion was an indifferent one on other counts than politics ; and that more than once — as in the case of Mrs. Riddell, and again, when he had to apologise for a toast no reasonable or well-bred man would have proposed in the presence of a King's officer, unless he were prepared to face the consequences — he behaved himself ill, according to the standard of good manners then and now. The explanation in these and other cases is that he was drunk ; and, as matter of fact, drink and disappointment were pretty certainly responsible between them for the mingled squalor and gloom and pathos of the end. There is nothing like liquor to make a strong man vain of his strength and jealous of his prerogative — even while it is stealing both away ; and there is nothing like disappointment to confirm such a man in a friend- ship for liquor. Last of all, there needs but little knowledge of character and life to see that to apologise for Burns is vain : that we must accept him frankly and without reserve for a peasant of genius perverted from his peasanthood, thrust into a place for which his peasanthood and his genius the conduct of the Parliamentary Whigs during the life and long after the death of Pitt. Of all men living Burns was entitled to an opinion ; of all men living he had the best gift of expression. Well, he had his opinion, and he used his gift ; and Dumfries could not forgive him. It is again a question of cir- cumstances. Fox and the rest were honoured Members of His Majesty's Opposition. Burns was only an exciseman. ROBERT BURNS 339 alike unfitted him, denied a perfect opportunity, constrained to live his qualities into defects, and in the long-run beaten by a sterile and unnatural en- vironment. We cannot make him other than he was, and, especially, we cannot make him a man of our own time : a man born tame and civil and unexces- sive — 'he that died o' Wednesday,' and had obituary notices in local prints. His elements are ail-too gross, are ail-too vigorous and turbulent for that. ' God have mercy on me,' he once wrote of himself, ' a poor damned, incautious, duped, unfortunate fool ! the sport, the miserable victim of rebellious pride, hypo- chondriac imaginations, agonising sensibility and bedlam passions.' Plainly he knew himself as his apologists have never known him, nor will ever know. That his intellectual and temperamental endow- ment was magnificent we know by the way in which he affected his contemporaries, and through the terms in which some of them — Robertson, Heron, Dugald Stewart, and, especially, Maria Riddell — recorded their impression of him ; yet we know also that, for all its magnificence, or, as I prefer to think, by reason of its magnificence, it could not save him from defeat and shame. Where was the lesion ? What was the secret of his fall ? Lord Rosebery, as I believe, has hit the white in' saying that he was 'great in his strength and great in his weaknesses.' 1 His master-qualities, this critic 1 I note with pleasure that Lord Rosebery knows too much of life, and is too good a judge of evidence, to think of putting a new complexion on the facts of these last, unhappy years. But has he been explanatory enough ? What, after all, but failure is possible for strength misplaced and misapplied ? 340 ROBERT BURNS very justly notes, were ' inspiration and sympathy.' But if I would add f and character' — which, to be sure, is largely an effect of conditions — how must the commentary run ? There is pride — the pride of Lucifer : what did it spare him in the end ? There is well-nigh the finest brain conceivable ; yet is there a certain curious intolerance of facts which obliges the owner of that brain, being a Government officer and seeing his sole future in promotion, to flaunt a friendship with roaring Jacobins like Max- well and Syme, and get himself nicknamed a ' Son of Sedition,' and have it reported of him, rightly or not, that he has publicly avowed disloyalty at the local theatre. 1 There is a passionate regard for women ; with, as Sir Walter noted, a lack of chivalry which is attested by those lampoons on living Mrs. Riddell and on dead Mrs. Oswald. There is the strongest sense of fatherhood, with the tenderest concern for ' weans and wife ' ; and there is that resolve for pleasure which not even these uplifting influences can check. There is a noble generosity of heart and temper ; but there is so imperfect a sense of conduct, so practical and so habitual a faith in a certain theory :• — 1 I do not for an instant forget that here is more circumstance : that he was a true Briton at heart, and that in the heginning his Jacobinism was chiefly, if not solely, an effect of sympathy with a tortured people. But there are ways and ways of favouring an unpopular cause; and Burns's were alike defiant and unwise. Thus Maxwell was practically what most people then called a 'murderer' — of the French King ; yet it was while, or soon after, the enormities of the Terror were at their worst, that he became a chief associate of Burns. To some this seems a ' noble im- prudence.' Was it not rather pure incontinence of self ? ROBERT BURNS 341 ' The heart ay 's the part ay That maks us richt or wrang ' : — that in the end you have a broken reputation, and death at seven or eight and thirty, is the effect of a variety of discrediting causes. Taking the pre- cisian's point of view, one might describe so extra- ordinary a blend of differences as a bad, well- meaning man, and one might easily enough defend the description. But the precisian has naught to do at this grave-side ; and to most of us now it is history that, while there was an infinite deal of the best sort of good in Burns, the bad in him, being largely compacted of such purely unessential defects as arrogance, petulance, imprudence, and a turn for self-indulgence, this last exasperated by the condi- tions in which his lot was cast, was not of the worst kind after all. Yet the bad was bad enough to wreck the good. The little foxes were many and active and greedy enough to spoil a world of grapes. The strength was great, but the weak- nesses were greater ; for time and chance and necessity were ever developing the weaknesses at the same time that they were ever beating down the strength. That is the sole conclusion possible. And to the plea, that the story it rounds is very pitiful, there is this victorious answer : — that the Man had drunk his life to the lees, while the Poet had fulfilled himself to the accomplishing of a peculiar immortality ; so that to Burns Death came as a deliverer and a friend. W. E. H. INDEX TO ESSAY A Bard's Epitaph, 259. A Big - Bellied Bottle (No Churchman Am I), 330. A Cock-Laird Fu' Cadgie, 324. Addison, 237. Address to a Haggis, 27G, 303. Address to the Unco Guid, 257, 273. Address to the Dcil, 257, 274. Ae Fond Kiss, and Then We Sever, 304, 306. Aiken, Robert, 257, 293, 300. Ainslie, Robert, 303, 308, 309, 310. Alloway Cottage, 235. A Poet's Welcome to His Lore- begotten Daughter, 251, 259, 260, 274. A Bed Red Rose, 327, 331. Armour, Jean, 280-292. Reconciliation with, 303, 307. Arnot, John, 289. A Rosebud By My Early Walk, 330. Aidd, Rev. William, 281. Auld Lang S[in' , 327, 331. Authors read by Eurns, 240, 241, 263. A Waukrifc Minnie, 331. Ayr, 242. Ayton, Sir Robert, 325, 326. Ay Waukin, O, 328, 331. Bachelors' Club, 246, 257. Ballantync, John, 294, 302. Ballochmyle, Lass of, 24S. Barbour, 265. Boattie, 263, 284. Begbie, Ellison, 249. Begg, Mrs., 260. Birth, 233, 235. Blacklock, Dr. Thomas, 294. Blair, Dr. Hugh, 296. Blake, 273. Bonnie Heck, 266. Border Tour, 303. Braxfield, M 'Queen of, 299. Brice, David, 284. Brown, Agnes (Mrs. William Burness), 235. Richard, 249, 250, 310, 311. Browning, 273. Bruce, Arthur, 300. Buchan, Earl of, 296. Burness (or Burnes), "William, 235-246, 253. Burnet, Miss Elizabeth, 296. Burns, Elizabeth, 316. Gilbert, 237, 238, 240, 241, 247, 248, 254, 256, 288, 294. Burns, Robert — Birth, 233, 235. Character and Influence, 234. Parentage, 235. 344 INDEX TO ESSAY Burns, Robert — continued : — Education and Favourite Authors, 236-242. Mount Oliphant, 239-245. Effects of Early Hardship, 243, 244. Lochlie, 245-254. Early Love Affairs, 247, 248, 249. Attitude towards Women, 247. Irvine, 249-253. Love - begotten Daughter, 251, 259. Death of his father, 253. MossgieL 254-312. As a Farmer, 256. Anti-clerical Poems, 257. Jacobitism, 258. Temperament, 258. Elizabeth Paton, 259. Characteristics of his Poetry, 261-279. Robert Fergusson and Ver- nacular Poets, Influence of, 262. Vernacular and English Verse contrasted, 262-269. Wordsworth and Byron, Influence on, 264. Relation to his Predeces- sors, 269-279. Masterpieces, 273. Humour, 275. Realism, 278. Jean Armour and Mary Campbell, 279-292. Kilmarnock Edition, 292. Mrs. Dunlop's Influence, 292. Edinburgh, 294-303. Conversational Powers and Dissipation, 299, 300. Burns, Robert — continued : — First Edinburgh Edition, 301. Border Tour, 303. Highland Tours, 303. John son' s3fusical Museum, 303. Reconciliation with Jean Armour, 303. Mrs. M'Lehose (Clarinda), 304-312. Relations with Jean Armour, 307-310. Marriage, 311, 312. Ellisland, 312-315. Excise Appointment, 313, 319. Sale at Ellisland and re- moval to Dumfries, 315. Anne Park, 315, 316. Chloris, 317. Too great for his Circum- stances, 320. As a Song-writer, 321-334. Dumfries, 334-342. Decadence and Failing Health, 335. Intellectual and Tempera- mental Endowment, 339. Jacobinism, 340. Death, 341. Byron, 234, 264, 271, 273, 275, 297. Caledonian Hunt, 301. Campbell, Mary, 283, 285-292. Carew, 325, 326. Castle Gordon, 330. Chambers, Robert, 285, 288, 301, 316. Charlie He 's my Darling, 334. Chloris, 317. Clarinda, 304-312, 320. INDEX TO ESSAY 345 Clarinda, Mistress of My Soul, 330. Clegkorn, Robert, 239. Conversational Powers, 300. Cork, Lord, 299. Corn Rigs, 268, 273. Cowper, 272. Creech, William, 296, 301. Crochallan Fencibles, 296, 299, 308. Currie, Dr., 288, 316, 336. Dalrymple, James, of Orange- field, 295, 296. Dalrymple Parish School, 241. Death and Dr. Hornbook, 274. Death, 318, 341. Despondency, 283. Dodsley, 326. Douglas, Gawain, 265, 278. Drink to Me Only With Thine Eyes, 327. Dumfries, 315, 334-342. Dunbar, William, 265, 278. Duncan Davison, 326, 331. Duncan Gray, 331. Dunlop, Mrs., 288, 292, 301, 302, 314, 315. Edinburgh, Burns in, 294-303. Edinburgh Edition, First, 301. Education and Favourite Authors, 236-242. Eglintoun, Earl of, 302. Elegy on Captain Matthew Hen- derson, 314. Ellibanks and Ellibraes, 323, 324. Ellisland, 311, 312-315. Epistle to a Youny Friend, 258, 290. to Davie, 261, 341. to Lapraik, 274. Epistle to James Smith, 274. to John Rankinc, 252, 258, 260, 274. Epitaph on Robert Fcryusson, 262. Errock Brae, 265, 324. Erskine, Harry, Dean of Faculty, 296. Excise Appointment, 313. Prospects of Pro- motion, 335. Fee Him, Father, 324. Fergusson, Provost of Ayr, 235, 245. Robert, 261, 264, 271, 278, 326. Findlater, Alexander, 337. Finlay (Wha is That at My Bower Door ?), 331. Flax-dressing at Irvine, 249. Fleming, Nanie, 288. For the Sake of Somebody, 326, 331. Fox, Charles James, 336, 338. Freemasonry, 246. French Revolution, Sympathy with, 335, 340. Garrick, 325. Gat Ye Me, 326. Glencairn, Lord, 296, 302, 313, 336. Glenriddell, Riddell of, 313. Goldsmith, 263. Gordon, Duchess of, 296, 297. Graham of Fintry, 299, 313, 336. Gray, 262, 263, 272, 284. Gray, Farquhar, 337. Green Grow the Rashes, 268, 273. Gregory, Dr., 296. Grose, Captain, 314. 346 INDEX TO ESSAY Halloween, 264, 273, 276, 277, 279. Hamilton, Gavin, 257, 258, 285, 292, 296, 298, 300, 312. Hamilton of Gilbertfield, 262, 266, 271. Helen of Kirkconnel, 324. Henryson, Robert, 265, 278. Heron, Robert, Author of Life of Burns, 293, 299, 300, 301, 302, 312, 316, 339. Herrick, 275. Highland Tours, 303. Holy Willie's Prayer, 257, 264, 273, 274, 276. Hoio Pleasant the Banks of the Clear Winding Devon, 330. Hume, David, 234. Hutcheson, Francis, 233, 234. i" Hae a Wife, 331. Irvine, 249. Is There For Honest Poverty, 330, 331. It Was A' For Our Ricjhtfu' King, 327, 331, 332. Jacobinism, 335, 340. Jacobitism, 258, 332. Jenny M'Craw, 265, 324. Johnie Scott, 324. Johnson's Musical Museum, 303, 314, 321, 334. Keats, 271, 272, 273, 275. Kilmarnock Edition, 281, 292. Kirk of Scotland, 233, 234, 236, 257, 260, 281. Kirkoswald, 244, 247. Knox, John, 236, 278. Laments on Luckie Spence and Others, 267. Landlady, Count theLa/win,326. Last May a Braw Wooer, 331. Lawrie, Rev. Dr., 295. Lewars, Jessie, 318. Lindsay, David, 265, 278. Lloyd, 325. Lochlie, 245-254. Lockhart, 276, 299, 337. Lorimer, Jean, 317. M'Diarmid, 315. Mackenzie, Henry, 275, 296, 301. M'Lehose, Mrs. (Clarinda), 304- 312, 320. M 'Lure (William Burness's landlord), 253. 3I'Pherson , s Lament, 331. Matty Stewart, 327. Marlowe, 272. Marriage, 312. Mary Morison, 273, 332. Mauchline, 257, 303, 307. Maxwell, Dr. William, 336, 340. Mayne, 326. Merry Muses of Caledonia, 296, 298, 324. Miller, Betty, 290. , Patrick, of Dalswinton, 312. Milton, 268, 272, 275. Mirabeau, 320. Montgomerie, 272, 278. Moore, Letters to, 237, 240, 246, 250, 251. Morris, Captain, 299. Mossgiel, 254-312. Mount Oliphant, 239-245. Muir, Robert, 282, 292, 302. Murdoch, John, Schoolmaster, 237-242. My Auntie Jean Held to the Shore, 316. INDEX TO ESSAY 347 Nature's Law, 292. Nicol, William, 303. No Churchmctn Am I (A Big- bellied Bottle), 256. Of A' the Airts, 315, 331, 334. Oliphaut, Mount, 239-2 !.">. O May, Thy Morn Was Ne'er Sae Sivect, 306. On a Bank of Flotoers, 330, 334. On Captain Grose, 314. On William Creech, 303. Orr, Thomas, 289. Oswald, Mrs., 340. Waly, Wahj, 323, 324. O Were my Love, 324. O Wert Thou in the Cauld Blast, 331. Parentage, 235. Taik, Anne, 315. Paton, Elizabeth, 249, 257, 259, 260, 280, 289, 291. Peacock, Flax-dresser, Irvine, 249, 250. Peasant, Scots, Character of, 252. Peasant's, Scots, Condition of Life, 236. Pinkerton, 265. Pitscottie, Lindsay of, 278. Pitt, William, 336, 338. Poor Mailie's Elegy, 266, 271. Poosie Nansie, 277. Pope, 263, 266. Ramsay, Allan, 262, 265, 266, 267, 271, 278, 326, 328. Ramsay of Auchtertyre, 258, 299. Raving Winds Around Her Blowing, 330. Reply to a Trimming Epistle, 252, 258, 260, 274. Richmond, John, 257, 282, 285, 288, 291, 292, 295, 296. Riddell, Maria, 297, 317, 320, 338, 339, 340. Robertson the Historian, 339. Rosebery, Earl of, 339. St. Andrew's Lodge, Edin- burgh, 296. Scotch Drink, 271, 274. Scots Wha Hac, 263, 330, 334. Scott, Alexander, 265, 278. Sir Walter, 297, 306, 337, 340. Scott Douglas, 315, 316. Sedley, 325. Sempills, The, 262, 265, 271, 278. Sensibility How Charming, 330. Shakespeare, 238, 268, 272, 275 Shelley, 271, 273. Shenstone, 263, 266, 2S4. Sillar, David, 248. Sloan, John, 315. Smith, Adam, 234. James, 281, 282. Songs of Burns, 321-334. Stevenson, R. L., 251, 262,267, 285, 289, 291. Stewart, Dugald, 262, 295, 296, 339. Strathallan's Lament, 330. Sweetest May, 326. Sylvander, 305. Syme, John, 336, 340. Tait, Saunders, 248, 249, 254, 307. Tarn Glen, 331. Tarn o' Shantcr, 263, 265, 269, 274, 277, 314, 321. Tarn Samson's Elegy, 271, 274. Tarbolton Mill, 307. 348 INDEX TO ESSAY The Author's Earnest Cry and Prayer, 274. The Brigs of Ayr, 271. The Bumper Toast, 299. The Cotter's Saturday Night, 257, 263, 271, 274, 276, 300. The Court of Equity, 257, 290, 300, 331. The Death and Dying Words of Poor Mailie, 261, 266, 271, 274. The Farmer to His Anld Mare, 264, 273. The Five Carlins, 314. The Fornicator, 252, 257, 260, 300. The Gloomy Night is Gathering Fast, 294. The Holy Fair, 257, 271, 273, 274, 276, 277, 307. The Holy Tulyie, 274. Their Groves of Sweet Myrtle, 330. 'The Isle,' 312. The Jolly Beggars, 257, 273, 276, 277, 315, 316. The Kirk's Alarm, 257, 313. The Lament, 283. The Lark, 329. The Lass of Ballochmylc, 248. Theobald, 326. The Ordination, 257, 274. The School for Love, 239. The Silver Tassie, 331. The Twa Corbies, 323, 324. The Twa Dogs, 245, 273. The Twa Herds, 257, 274. The Vision, 263, 274. The Whistle, 314. The Winter It Is Past, 326, 334. Thomson, George, 317, 321, 334. James, 272, 284. — Peggy, 247, 289. Thomson's Scottish Airs, 321. Thou Lingering Star, 288, 314. To a Louse, 273. To a Mountain Daisy, 263, 271, 274, 300. To a Mou,se, 271, 273. Toddlin Hamc, 323, 324. To John Goldic, 257. To the Guidwife of Wauchope House, 303. Turn Again, Thou, Fair Eliza, 330. Vernacular School of Poetrv, 234, 261, 263-279, 321-334. Walker, Josiah, 299. We're A' Noddin, 326. West Indies, 281, 285, 287, 294. llliistle and I'll Come To You, 331. Williams, Helen Maria, 313., Willie Brcw'd a Peck o' Maut 304, 314, 331, 334. Winter, 271. Wordsworth, 264, 273. Yestreen I Had a Pint o' Wine, 315. Ye Banks and Braes o' Bonic Doon, 331. Printed by T. and A. Constable, Printers to Her Majesty at the Edinburgh University Press H -W WW >s T m? ■€m i ■1 BH 1 k«§ 1 Hal ^m ■I KM H ^'■V-.V ^H ami *»-*,! b|PC