■ ll '' 4 . 'flp Itt!!* m- OF THE ■ — ^^ Name of Book and Volume, XkAl Division Range 5«y: 'i^X Received /(^//^^^,_(^^^^ i87c5 LECTURES ON SUBJECTS CONNECTED WITH LITERATURE AND LIFE. EDWIN P. WHIPPLE, AUTHOR OF "ESSAYS AND REVIEWS." SIXTH EDITION. BOSTON: TICKNOR AND FIELDS M DCCC LXVI. Ealered according to Act of Congress, m the year 1849, by E. P. Whipple, Iq the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the DistriQt of Alaesachuselta fAk/7 Mm a] CONTENTS. LECTURE 1. Page Authors in their Relations to Life, 7 LECTURE II. Novels and Novelists. — Charles Dickens, ... 43 LECTURE III. Wit and Humor, 84 LECTURE IV. The Ludicrous Side of Life, 122 LECTURE V. Genius, 156 LECTURE VI. Intellectual Health and Disease, 186 Library. LECTURE I.* AUTHORS IN THEIR RELATIONS TO LIFE. There has existed in all ages a class of men, called at different periods by different names, but generally com- prehended under the name of authors. They hold the same relation to the mind of man that the agriculturist and manufacturer bear to his body ; and by virtue of their sway over the realms of thought and emotion, they have exercised a vast influence upon human affairs, which has too often been overlooked or denied by earth's industrial and political sovereigns. Operating as they do on unseen substances, and working silent and mys- terious changes in the inward man, without altering his external aspect, they have strangely puzzled the whole horde of bigots and tyrants, and have written their Mene, Mene, Tekel, TJpharsin on the walls of earth's proudest palaces. On the occasion of a literary anni- versary like yours, I am aware of no more appropriate * Delivered before the Literary Societies of Brown University, Sept. 1, 1846. 6 AUTHORS. subject, — none which is more likely to bear, remotely or immediately, on your own future pursuits and profes- sions, — than this of Authors ; and in tracing out some of their relations to life, I think I can inflict less tedious- ness upon you than if I had selected some topic with a more resounding name, and admitting of more ambitious disquisition. My object will be to set forth their moral and intellectual influence, the physical necessities which have modified the direction of their powers, and the dis- crepancies observable between their internal and external existence. This will involve a consideration of their relations to their age, to booksellers, and to domestic and social life. You must pardon the remediless superficial- ity of my view, as each division might well exliaust a volume. And first, let us refer to the influence of authors, and the position they have occupied in the world. Without taking into view the lives and thoughts of authors, history becomes an enigma, or a many-volumed lie. We read of wars, crusades, persecutions, ameliora- tions, of mighty and convulsive changes in opinions and manners, without obtainmg any clue to the real causes of events, any insight into the laws of God's providence. Without inweaving literary into civil history, we gain no knowledge of the annals of human nature. We have the body of history without the soul, — events without AUTHORS 9 ideas, — effects without causes, — the very atheism of narrative. The abridgments we study at schools are commonly made up of incidents jumbled together like beads, and unconnected by any thread of reason and reality. It is hardly possible for a boy, studying these works, to grasp any other idea of man than the idea of a being with legs, arms, and appetites. Now it is a fact that Thought, true or false, bene- ficial or pernicious, has borne the sceptre of influence in this world's affairs. Impulse, whim and chance, have not been the blind guides of the generations of men. Above all the fret and tumult of active existence, above the decrees of earth's nominal sovereigns, above all the violence and evil which render what is called history so black a record of folly and crime — above all these, there have ever been certain luminous ideas, pillars of fire in the night of time, which have guided and guarded the great army of humanity, in its slow and hesitating, but still onward, progress in knowledge and freedom. It is not the ruler that makes the most noise in the world, that most shapes the world's fortunes. Ten rockets, sent vio- lently into the air, by their blaze and impotent fury, attract all eyes, and seem much finer and grander than the eternal stars ; but after their short and rushing life has burnt out, and they have noised themselves into nothingness, the stars still shine serenely on, and seem 10 AUTHORS. almost to look down with contempt on the crowd who have been fooled into fear or admiration. Thus is it in history. The being to whose conumands is given a brief omnipotence, — whose single word moves myriads of men, — on whom power and glory are lavished without measure, — is often but the mere instrument of some idea or principle, mightier than he ; and to find his mas- ter and king, we must travel back years, and perhaps ages, and seek him in the lonely cell of some poor and despised student, whose busy brain is shaping in silence those immaterial substances, destined to shake the world ; to fall like fire upon the hearts of men, and kindle in them new life and energy ; to overthrow and to rebuild thrones : to be the roots of new moral and intellectual dynasties ; and, keeping their way through generation after generation, to come out in the end gloriously or in- famously, according as they are founded in justice and truth, or falsehood and wrong. Thus the thinker ever precedes the actor. Thoughts ever have to battle them- selves into institutions. The passage of a paradox into a truism is attended with numberless commotions. With these commotions, rather than with the ideas and feel- ings whence they spring, history has chiefly chosen to deal ; and it rarely notices the ten thousand agencies operating on a nation's mind, until revolutions have passed from thoughts into facts, and made themselves AUTHORS. H Known on fields of stricken battle. Every great origin- ating mind produces in some way a change in society ; every great originating mind whose exercise is controlled by duty, effects a beneficial change. This effect may be immediate, may be remote. A nation may be in a tumult to-day, for a thought which the timid Erasmus placidly penned in his study more than two centuries ago. ^Thought may be first Avritten in an unintelligible jargon, in Benthamese or Kantese, for instance ; but every Ben- tham finds his Dumont, and every Kant his Cousin. An author may affect his race through conductors. He may be mysterious ; others will translate him to the people. He may be a coward ; others will do the fighting. He may be a wretch, studious of infamy ; Humanity takes the thought, and spurns the man. Many poets who have led lives of luxury and effeminacy, and sat honored guests at the tables of tyrants, have still exalted our con- ceptions of intellectual excellence, refined our manners, extended the range of our sympathies. They have mod- ified the institutions of society by modifying the mental character of society, of which institutions are the out- ward expression. A change in thought or prejudice works out, in the end, a change in governments and laws. " Beware," says a brilliant essayist, " when the great God lets loose a thinker on this planet. Then all things are at risk." 12 AUTHORS. Authors are thus entitled to a prominent rank among the producing classes, and their lives deserve a more intelligent scrutiny from the practical men who stigma- tize them as dreamers. Their importance has rarely been correctly estimated, either in summing up a na- tion's wealth or a nation's dangers. Society has played with them its most capricious game of coquetr}^ The same generation which neglects or tortures a man of letters, will often supply a whole army of admiring com- mentators to distort his works. "Ten ancient towns contend for Homer dead, Through which the living Homer begged his bread." No language can fitly express the meanness, the base- ness, the brutality, with which the world has ever treated its victims of one age and boasts of the next. Dante is worshipped at that grave to which he was hurried by persecution. Milton, in his own day, was " Mr. Milton, the blind adder, that spit his venom on the king's per- son ;" and soon after, " the mighty orb of song." These absurd transitions from hatred to apotheosis, this recogni- tion just at the moment when it becomes a mockery, sadden all intellectual history. Is it not strange that the biography of authors should be so steeped in misery, --that while exercising the most despotic dominion that man can wield over the fortunes of his race, their own lives should so often present a melancholy AUTHORS. 13 spectacle of unrest, unhappiness, frailty, beggary, and despair ? What has been the fate of those who have striven hard to bring the actual world nearer to ideal perfection ? Has not fidelity to ideas, the exercise of moral courage in the cause of truth, when it could not be pensioned into apostacy, been too often rewarded with persecution into heaven ? The cold, lifeless axiom, so inoffensively ineffective, and so securely announced from the dull soul of the pedant — how has it been, when it came hissing hot from the gushing heart of genius, tearing and ripping up the surface concealments of tolerated sins ? Wherever a great soul has raised the banner of revolt against accred- ited fraud or honored duncery, thither has flown Igno- rance with her bats and owls, thither has sped Power with his racks and gibbets. Do you Vv^onder that so much of the world's intellect has been chained, like a galley- slave, to the world's corruptions, when you find its free and honest exercise so often thus rewarded with poverty or death ? Time, to be sure, that consecrates all things, conse- crates even the lives of authors. When the great man is laid in his grave, lies of malice are apt to give way to lies of adulation. Men feel his genius more, and his faults less. The cry then is, to bury the evil he has done with his bones, — to forbear dragging his frailties 14 AUTHORS. from their dread abode. Then steps forth a debonair biographer, to varnish his errors or crimes, in order that he may appear respectably before that dear public whose stupidity or caprice may have urged him to their com- mission. It is well, after calumny has feasted and fattened on his name, that he should undergo the solemn foolery of a verbal beatitude ! Indeed, it seems strange, that the old maxim declaring no human being to have arrived at perfection on earth should still be heard from the pulpit, when even every newspaper obituary gives it the lie ! There is, indeed, a natural disposition with us to judge an author's personal character by the character of his works. We find it difficult to understand the common antithesis of a good writer and a bad man. We dislike to believe that any of those gifted beings who have been the choicest companions of our best and happiest hours, who have kindled or exalted our love of the beautiful and good, who have given us knowledge and power, and whose words rebuke us for our own moral as well a? mental inferiority, should have ugly spots of meanness or baseness blotting their bright escutcheons. We in- stinctively lend a greedy ear to the weakest apologies offered in behalf of our favorites, and side with them against any who may have been their adversaries or victims. The greater the writer, the more pertinaciously AUTHORS. 15 we sophisticate away the faults of the man. We side with Pope in his quarrel with Gibber, with Addison in his quarrel with Steele. We give little credence to the fact that Bacon took bribes, or that Byron took gin. No notoriety given to Campbell's vices can make us believe the creator of Gertrude, envious, malignant and sottish. Let mediocrity commit similar faults to those we pardon in genius, and we should hurl at it our loudest thunders of rebuke. Forgetting that writers are men, exposed to more than common trials and temptations, we fondly believe their external life always in harmony with theii internal ideals. A little reflection teaches us that the truisms of thought are the paradoxes of action. If this be true, then the ideals of thought may be almost classed among the prodigies of conduct; and in literature we must often be indebted for priceless benefits to men personally unworthy of our esteem ; to have our cour- age kindled by the oratory of cowards ; our confidence in virtue strengthened by the poetry of debauchees ; and our loftiest sentiments of liberty and disinterestedness ennobled by imaginations shaped by the servile and the mean. To reconcile this monstrous anomaly with nature, we must recollect two things : first, that the possession of great energies of mind does not suppose the absence c^ bad passions; and second, that authors are compelled, 16 AUTHORS. like other men, to labor for a subsistence. In some cases, it is true, the man of genius is blasted from within ; his genius becoming the slave of unbitted passions and Satanic pride. Thus Campbell compared the unwearied fire that burned in the breast of Byron to the " robe and golden crown which Medea, in Euripides, sends Glauce, the wife of Jason ; their beauty and magic loveliness did not prevent them from consuming to ashes the victim whom they so gorgeously adorned." In some cases, too, the lust of the intellect has been stronger than the lust of the flesh, and put iron wills into evil hearts, " Whose steep aim Was, Titan-like, on daring doubts to pile Thoughts which should draw down thunder, and the flame Of heaven." But poverty, perhaps, has been the most fertile source of literary crimes. Men of letters have ever displayed the same strange indisposition to starve common to other descendants of Adam. The law of supply and demand operates in literature as in trade. For instance, if a poor poet, rich only in the riches of thought, be placed in an age which demands intellectual monstrosities, he is tempted to pervert his powers to please the general taste. This he must do or die, and this he should rather dijp than do ; but still, if he hopes to live by his products, he must produce what people will buy, — and it is already AUTHORS. 17 supposed that nothing will be bought except what is brainless or debasing. The opposite of this is likewise true. If a man of mental power and moral weakness be placed in an age which demands purity in its literature, his writings may exhibit a seraphical aspect, while his life is stained with folly and wickedness. Thus it is that many writers who have lived decently good lives have written indecently bad works ; and many who have lived indecently bad lives have written decently good works ; and the solution of the mystery lies not in the brain, but in the physical necessities, of the man. Poets are by no means wingless angels, fed with ambrosia plucked from Olympus, or manna rained down from heaven. This brings us to one great division in every author's life, — his relation to the public. This can be best illus- trated by a pertinent example from a corrupt age. John Dryden had a clear perception of moral truth, and no natural desire to injure his species. He was an eminent professional author during the reign of Charles II. The time in which he lived was one of great depravity of taste, and greater depravity of manners. Authors seemed banded in an insane crusade to exalt blasphemy and profligacy to the vacant throne of piety and virtue. Books were valuable according to the wickedness blended with their talent. Mental power was lucrative only in 2 18 AUTHORS. its perversion. The public was ravenous for the witty iniquities of the brain ; and, to use the energetic invec- tive of South, laid hold of brilliant morsels of sin, with " fire and brimstone flaming round them, and thus, as it were, digested death itself^ arid made a meal upon per- dition.''^ Now, it is evident, in such a period as this, a needy author was compelled to choose between virtue attended by neglect, and vice lackeyed by popularity. One of Sir Charles Sedley's profligate comedies, one of Lord Rochester's ribald lampoons, possessed more mer- cantile value than the Paradise Lost. In such a period as this, the poet should have descended upon his time, like Schiller's ideal artist, "not to delight it with his pres- ence, but terrible, like the son of Agamemnon, to purify it." Dryden was placed in this age, and, for a long period of his life, was its pander and parasite. The author of Alexander's Feast condescended to write comedies whose ferocious licentiousness astounds and bewilders the modem reader. Yet, had he lived in the reign of George III., he would not have been more immoral than Churchill; had he lived in our day, his muse would have been as pure as that of Campbell. He could not, or would not, learn that it is better to starve on honesty than thrive on baseness. "It is hard," says an old English divine, " to maintain truth, but still harder to be maintained by it." AUTHORS. 19 Now this mercantile or economical element, this dispo- sition to let out talent as a jaded hack in the service of Satan, when Satan pays the price, looks out upon us con- stantly from literary history. In this connection it would be unjust not to pay a passing tribute to that long-eared wisdom which obtains in our country, of starving authors down into despair in order that they may be lifted thence by sin — that sagacious philosophy which sees no danger in neglecting a poor novelist or poet, and then contrives to be astonished at the ability displayed in an atheistic pamphlet or an agrarian harangue. The merchant, who sneers at literary pursuits, shuts his purse when a new volume appears, and clamors for the protection of all manufactures but those of the mind, might, perhaps, if he were logically inclined, trace some connection be- tween his foolish illiberality and a financial storm which stripped him of half his fortune, or a quack medicine which poisoned his wife, or a bad book which ruined the morals of his son. It is this senseless and disgraceful contempt for the power of authors which causes much of the perv^ersion of talent so common in our day. Let us suppose the case of a man who, led by some inscruta- ble' inward impulse, adopts the profession of American authorship. Of course, this act would furnish indubi- table proof of insanity in any candid court of justice ; but waiving that consideration, let us hear the advice given 20 AUTHORS. to him after his first book has gone the way of the trunk- maker's, after a sale of ten copies. He is told that he made a mistake in the selection of his subject; that the people want something in the " flash line." It is well for him if he can reconcile the flash line with the line of duty. However, he proceeds in his course, until all notion of the dignity of authorship vanishes from his mind. Literature, to him, is the manufacture of ephem- eral inanities and monstrous depravities, to serve as food for fools and vagabonds. He is ready to write on any subject which wiU aflford him bread, — moral or immoral, religious or atheistic, solid or flash. He lets out his pen to the highest bidder, as Captain Dalgetty let out his sword. You may hire him to write transcendentalism ; you may hire him to write brain-sick stories for namby- pamby magazines; you may hire him to write quack advertisements. And this is a successor of John Milton, — as Pope Joan was a successor of Saint Peter ! But where lies the blame? The "respectable" portion of society aver that the blame lies in the author ; reason seems to assert that the blame lies in'the " respectable " portion of society. Indeed, it seems impossible for men to realize the im- portance and influence of authors, as purifiers or poison- ers of the public taste and morals. For evil or good, they exercise a vast and momentous dominion. But AUTHORS. 21 they are not generally men distinguished from Dther men by superior strength of principle. If neglected and despised, they teach the lesson, that if virtue and truth decline paying wages to talent, falsehood and profligacy are not so parsimonious. Burke, no superficial reader of men and books, says, in one of his immortal pamphlets, that " he can form a tolerably correct estimate of what is likely to happen in a character chiefly dependent for fame and fortune on knowledge and talent, both in its morbid and perverted state, and in that which is sound and natural. Natu- rally, such men are the first gifts of Providence to the world. But when they have once cast oflf the fear of God, which in all ages has been too often the case, and the fear of man, which is now the case ; and when, in that state, they come to understand one another, and to act in corps, a more fearful calamity cannot arise out of hell to scourge mankind." Now, whether American authors are to be scourges or blessings rests with those who are to be injured or benefited. But one thing is certain, that social order, good government, correct morals, cannot long be preserved after well- fed and well-principled mediocrity has divorced itself from ill-fed and loose-principled talent. And it is per- fectly right that it should be so. It is according to the heaven-ordained constitution of things. A nation which 22 AUTHORS. places implicit reliance on steam-engines and mill-privi- leges will find that in all that affects the weal or woe of communities mind-power is greater than steam-power, — a truth which should be held up in the faces of our shrewd and prudent worldlings, till, like the poet's mirror of diamond, " it dazzle and pierce their misty eye-balls." It is doubtless very pleasant, and very agreeable, to shoot out the tongue at the mere mention of a national litera- ture, to belittle and degrade the occupation of letters ; but let those complacent gentlemen who practise the jest look to it that the sparks they would trample under foot fly not up in their own faces. " Literature," said Mr. Pitt to Robert Southey, " will take care of itself." — " Yes," was the reply, " and take care of you too, if you do not see to it." But there is a class of authors different from those who cringe to prevalent tastes, and pander to degrading passions ; men whom neither power can intimidate, nor flattery deceive, nor wealth corrupt; the heroes of intel- lectual history, who combine the martyr's courage with the poet's genius, and who, in the strength of their fixed wills and free hearts, might have scoffed as divinely at the threats of earth-bom power as the Virgin Martyr of Massinger at the torturers of Diocletian and Maximi* nus: — AtJTHORS. 23 " The visage of the hangman frights not me ! The sight of whips, racks, gibbets, axes, fires, Are scaffoldings on which my soul climbs up To an eternal habitation." This class, it must be confessed, is small. It does not include many men of unquestioned genius. It does not include many whose works will be read and loved forever. But such an one was Dante, to whose raised spirit, even in this life, the world had passed away. Such was Schiller, toiling for twenty years up the topless pinnacle of thought, unconquered by constant physical pain, his upward eye ever fixed on his receding ideal. Such was Shelley, who made his stricken life, with all its stern agonies and cruel disappointments, " A doom As glorious as a fiery martyrdom." Such was Wordsworth, unmoved by ridicule and neglect, calmly writing poems for another generation to read. And such, above all, was Milton. No eulogy, though carved in marble, can rightly celebrate his character and genius : — " Nothing can cover his high fame, but Heaven ; No monument set off his memories, But the eternal substance of his greatness." The austere grandeur of his life may well excite the wonder of the traders, panders and parasites of literature. His patience and conscience were tried by all the calami- 24 AUTHORS. ties which break down the spirits of common men, — by sickness, by blindness, by poverty, by the ingratitude of his children, by the hatred of the powerful, by the malice of the base. But the might of his moral nature overcame them all. No one can fitly reverence Milton who has not studied the character of the age of Charles II., in which his later fortunes were cast. He was Dryden's contem- porary in time, but not his master or disciple in slavish- ness. He was under the anathema of power : a repub- lican, in days of abject servility ; a Christian, among men whom it would be charity to call infidels ; a man of pure life and high principle, among sensualists and rene- gades. On nothing external could he lean for support. In his own domain of imagination perhaps the greatest poet that ever lived, he was still doomed to see such pitiful and stupid poetasters as Shadwell and Settle bear away the shining rewards of letters. Well might he declare that he had fallen on evil times ! He was among his opposites, — a despised and high-souled Puri- tan-poet, surrounded by a horde of desperate and disso- lute scribblers, who can be compared, as an accomplished critic has eloquently said, " to nothing so fitly as the rabble in Comus, grotesque monsters, half bestial, half human, dropping^ with wine, bloated with glut- tony, reeling in obscene dances. Amidst these his muse was placed, like the chaste lady of the masque, AUTHORS. 25 lofty, spotless and serene, — to be chattered at, and pointed at, and grinned at, by the whole rabble of satyrs and goblins." Yet, from among such base environ- ments, did Milton " soar in the high reason of his fan- cies, with his garland and singing robes about him;" and while suffering the bitterest penalties of honesty and genius, in that age of shallow wit and profound villany, his soul never ceased to glow with the grandeur of that earlier day, when he had stood forth foremost among the champions of truth, and like his own invinci- ble warrior. Zeal, " a spirit of the largest size and divinest mettle," had driven his fiery chariot over the heads of " scarlet prelates," " bruising their stiff necks under his flaming wheels." The genius of Milton is indeed worthy ail the admiration we ^ award marvellous intellectual' endowment; but how much more do we ven- erate the whole man, Avhen we find it riveted to that high and hardy moral courage which makes his name thunder rebuke to all power that betrays freedom, to all genius that is false to virtue ! Dante, Schiller, Shelley, Milton, — poets, heroes, martyrs," — must the mournful truth be forced from our reluctant lips, — " Their mighty spirits Lie raked up with their ashes in their urns, And not a spark of their eternal fire Glows in a present bosom." 96 AUTHORS. The relation of an author to his age is the most impor- tant of his life. We have seen what terrible temptations beset him in this relation, — how apt are his principles to break Hke bubbles into air, when tried by want and oblo- quy. But, perhaps, with him it is more properly a rela- tion to his publisher ; and certainly few chapters of liter- ary history are more curious than those relating to the connection of writers and booksellers. In this division of his life, the man of letters appears as a man of busi- ness. No two classes connected by ties of interest have hated each other more cordially than these ; and none have had more reason. It is difficult to say which has suffered most. The result of all inquiries may be summed up in this, — that booksellers have realized for- tunes out of works they purchased for a pittance, and that on a majority of published books there has been a loss. "Learning," pithily says old Dr. Fuller, "has made most by those books on which the printers have lost." On one side, we are told that booksellers are grasping and knavish; capitalists who loan money on mortgages of brain and conscience ; bon-vivants, who drink their wine out of authors' skulls. That fine old poet, Michael Drayton, calls them " a base company of knaves, whom he scorns and kicks at." Epithets as contemptuous swarm in all printed books. Indeed, the author heretofore has shown little sagacity in his deal- AUTHORS. 27 ings with "the trade." He has sold his commodities when spurred by pressing necessities ; and it is an uni- versal rule, that when the author wants money the pub- lisher never wants books. No writer who does not desire to end his life in beggary and despair, should ever treat with a bookseller when he is dunned by a washenvoman or dogged by a sheriff. In the present century, Scott, Byron, Moore, Mackintosh, and Dickens, have showTi in this far more tact and shrewdness than their brethren of former -times. Scott was nominally paid nearly a million of dollars for his works. Byron received ten dollars a line for the fourth canto of Childe Harold. Moore obtained two thousand pounds for his Life of Sheridan, three thousand pounds for Lalla Rookh, four thousand pounds for his Life of Byron. The list might be indefinitely extended. But, in fact, until the latter part of the last century, the science of bot)k- making and book-publishing was imperfectly understood. The "reading public" is a creation of the last eighty years. Previously, writers depended for subsistence chiefly on the theatre, the patronage of the noble, the favor of seqts and factions. The age of general intel- ligence, which makes the great body of the nation the dispensers of fame and fortune, had not commenced. The work best remunerated during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was Pope's translation of the Iliad, 28 AUTHORS. for which he received about five thousand three hun- dred pounds. Most of Pope's contemporaries w^ere but poorly paid for their literary tasks, and he himself re- ceived but fifteen pounds for the Essay on Criticism, and twenty-two pounds for the Eape of the Lock. B}Ton calls the hacks of an eminent bookseller of that period "Jacob Tohson's ragamuffins." Pope, in satirizing them, dwelt with malicious emphasis on their rags and their hunger. The age which succeeded that of Queen Anne was still worse. The patronage of nobles and politicians, which had been freely extended to the best poets of the preceding generation, was withdrawn. A large portion of the life of so eminent a man as Dr. Johnson was spent in a desperate and nearly fruitless attempt to keep up the connection be- tween his body and soul, constantly threatened by pressing want. The character of a considerable portion of professional authors was little higher than that of street beggars. Occasionally they would obtain a little money. Riot and gaming soon relieved them of . it. With the proceeds of a successful pamphlet or servile dedication, to use the words of another, " they soon diced themselves into spunging-houses, or drank themselves into fevers." The art of dodging a bailiflf and bilking a landlord was more important to the poet than the art of pointing an epigram or polishing a period. Some AUTHORS. 29 of these men were fortunate enough to have residences in cellars or garrets; but most of them, with the blue tent of the sky pitched above their heads, must have waited all night, with shivering frames, for the sweet influences fabled to fall from Orion and the Pleiades. The gulf that yawned between the mouth of a poet and the shop of a baker was almost as deep and wide as that which, spread between Lazarus and Dives. Only by the fiercest exertion could the chasm be abridged, and a frail com- munication opened between the two. Of course, such persons, with five ravenous senses unsupplied, were ready to write anything which would afford them a few guineas. The booksellers, under whose " inquisitorious and tyran- nical duncery no free and splendid wit could flourish," keeping them accurately poised between want and utter starvation, employed them to celebrate any remarkable event, any piece of domestic scandal, any assault upon decorum and decency, which would be likely to sell. This era, the darkest and most dreary in English letters, presents the most melancholy satire on author- ship extant. There will you see the last infirmity and profanation of intellect, — sin shorn of its dazzling robes, and strutting no longer on its Satanic stilts, but creeping, shrivelled and shivering, to its slavish tasks, chained to the ever restless wheel of its objectless drudgery, to be 30 AUTHORS. t tumbled down at last into the dust with poverty and shame. We now come to a delicate part of the subject, which every prudent man would wish to avoid, — the relation of authors to domestic life, their glory or shame as lovers and husbands. One great fact here stares us in the face, — that the majority of those men who, from Homer downwards, have done most to exalt woman into a divinity, have either been bachelors or unfortunate hus- bands. Prudence forbid that I should presume to give the philosophy of this singular, and, doubtless, accidental occurrence, or find any preestablished harmony be- tween heaven-scaling imaginations and vixenish wives. Still, it must be said, that not only with regard to poets, but authors generally, a great many have been unhap- pily married; and a great many more, perhaps you would say, unhappily unmarried. The best treatise on divorce was written by the laureate of Eve and the cre- ator of the lady in Comus. The biography of scholars and philosophers sometimes hints at voices neither soft nor low piercing the ears of men meditating on Greek roots, or framing theories of the moral sentiments. You all know the aidful sympathy that Socrates received from Xantippe, in his great task of confuting the lying inge- nuities of the Greek sophists, and bringing down philos- ophy from heavdn to earth. The face of one of Eng- AUTHORS. 31' land's earliest and best linguists is reported to have often exhibited crimson marks, traced by no loving fingers; and Greek, Hebrew, Latin, and English, must often have met and run together in his brain, as it reeled beneath the confusing ring of a fair hand knocking at his ears. The helpmates of Whitelocke and Bishop Coop- er were tempestuous viragos, endowed with a genius for scolding, who burnt their husbands' manuscripts, and broke in upon their studies and meditations with reproaches and threats. Hooker, the saint and sage of English divinity, was married to an acute vixen, with a temper compounded of vinegar and saltpetre, and a tongue as explosive as gun-cotton. Addison espoused a countess ; and spent the rest of his life in taverns, clubs, and repentance. Some men of genius, Moliere and Rousseau, for ex- ample, have had unsympathizing wives. Sir Walter Scott, walking once with his wife in the fields, called her attention to some lambs, remarking that they were beautiful. " Yes," echoed she, " lambs are beautiful, — boiled ! " That incomparable essayist and chirping phi- losopher, Montaigne, married but once. When his good wife left him, he shed the tears usual on such occasions, and said he would not marry again, though it were to Wisdom herself. A young painter of great promise once told ftir Joshua Reynolds that he had taken a wife. 32 AUTHORS. "Married!" ejaculated the horrified Sir Joshua; "then you are ruined as an artist." Michael Angelo, when asked why he never married, replied, — " I have espoused my art, and that occasions me sufficient domestic cares ; for my works shall be my children." The wives of Dante, Milton, Dryden, Addison, Steele, shed no glory on the sex, and brought no peace to their firesides. The bitterest satires and noblest eulogies on married life have come from poets. Love, indeed, has ever been the inspiration of poetry. From Theocritus all the way down to the young gentleman that drizzled in yesterday's newspaper, it has provoked millions on millions of good and bad verses, most of which have been kindly gathered by Oblivion under her dusky wing. Among these mountains of amatory poetry, there are doubtless some of the finest imaginations and truest and noblest sentiments ever breathed from the lips of genius ; but the greater portion only prove, that if love softens the heart, it does not always decline perfonning a similar service to the head. I know a very sensible man who preserves in an iron box some of these metrical indiscretions of his youth, in order, if he is ever accused of a capital crime, that he may produce them as furnishing indubitable proofs of insanity. The most notable instance of inconstancy related in the "loves of the poets" is that of Lucy Sacheverell, to whom Col. Lovelace, the Philip Sidney AUTHORS. 33 of Charles I.'s court, was warmly attached. He cele- brated her accomplishments m some exquisite poetry ; but, on his being taken prisoner in one of the wars of the time, and reported to be dead, she hastily married another. He soon returned to his native land, impre- cated divers anathemas on the sex, and declined into a vagabond, — dying perhaps of a malady, common enough in dark ages, but now happily banished from genteel society, a broken heart. Perhaps the sweetest pictures in the poetry of human life are those which represent the domestic felicity of those authors who married happily. The wives of Wieland, Buffon, Gesner, Herder, Priestley, Words- worth, not to mention others, are especially honored among women. Who has not sometimes seen, in the wife of scholar or artist, that elusive and unutterable charm, which has made his heart echo the praise of Fletcher's ideal Panthea? — "She is not fair Nor beautiful ; these words express her not : They say her looks have something excellent, That wants a name yet." Wordsworth, with that pensive spiritualism which char- acterizes all his poetry relating to the affections, has in three lines fitly inmiortalized his own noble wile, as 3 34 AUTHORS. " She who dwells with me, whom I have loved With such communion, that no place on earth Can ever be a solitude to me." Wherever, in fact, a noble spirit has been fortunate in his domestic relations, he has left testimonials in his writings that those human affections, which are the monopoly of none, are more productive of solid happi- ness than wealth, or power, or fame ; than learning that comprehends all knowledge ; than understanding which sweeps over the whole domain of thought ; than imag- inations which rise and run over regions to which the " heaven of heavens is but a veil." Of the relations of authors to social life, of their habits, manners, dispositions in society, as contrasted with those displayed in their writings, a great deal that is interest- ing might be said. A man of letters is often a man with two natures, — one a book nature, the other a human nature. These often clash sadly. Seneca wrote in praise of poverty, on a table formed of Solid gold, with two millions of pounds let out at usury. Steme was a very selfish man ; according to Warburton, an irreclaim- able rascal ; yet a writer unexcelled for pathos and char- ity. Sir Richard Steele wrote excellently well on tem- perance, — when he was sober. Dr. Johnson's essays on politeness are admirable ; yet his " You lie, sir ! " and " You don't understand the question, sir ! " were too AUTHORS. ^ common characteristics of his colloquies. He and Dr. Shebbeare were both pensioned at the same time. The report inunediately flew, that the king had pensioned two bears, — a he-bear and a she-bear. Young, whose gloomy fancy cast such sombre tinges on life, was in society a brisk, lively man, continually pelting his hearers with puerile puns. Mrs. Carter, fresh from the stem, dark grandeur of the Night Thoughts, expressed her amazement at his flippancy. "Madam," said he, " there is much difierence between writing and talking." The same poet's favorite theme was the nothingness of worldly things ; his favorite pursuit was rank and riches. Had Mrs. Carter noticed this incongruity, he might have added, — "Madam, there is much diflerence between writing didactic poems and living didactic poems." Bacon, the most comprehensive and forward-looking of modem intellects, and in feeling one of the most benevo- lent, was meanly and wickedly ambitious of place. Of the antithesis between the thoughts of this great bene- factor of mankind and the actions of this inquisitor and supple politician, Macaulay remarks, in his short, sharp way, — " To be the leader of his race, in the career of improvement, was in his reach. All this, however, was of no avail while some quibbling special pleader was promoted before him to the bench ; while some heavy country gentleman took precedence of him by 36 AUTHORS. virtue of a purchased coronet; while some pander, happy in a fair wife, could obtain a more cordial salute from Buckingham ; while some buffoon, versed in the latest scandal of the court, could draw a louder laugh from James." But enough for the external life of authors. Their inward life is what most concerns posterity, and consti- tutes their immortal existence. We might, for instance, speculate on the outward life of Shakspeare, and obtain tolerably clear notions of his acts and conversation as they appeared to his contemporaries ; but of those awful periods when the conceptions of Lear and Hamlet, of Macbeth and Timon, dawned upon his mind ; of those moments when his shaping and fusing imagination trav- ersed earth and heaven, " invisible but gazing ;" of those hours of meditation when the whole chart of exist- ence lay before his inward eye, and he sounded all its depths and shallows ; — these we must seek in the im- mortal pages wherein they are chronicled. And here lies our indebtedness to authors, the undying benefactors of all ages. How shall we fitly estimate this vast inher- itance of the world's intellectual treasures, to which all are bom heirs ? What words can declare the inmieas- urable worth of books, — what rhetoric set forth the im- portance of that great invention which diffused them over the whole earth to glad its myriads of minds ? The AUTHORS. 37 invention of printnig added a new element of power to the race. From that hour, in a most especial sense, the brain and not the arm, the thinker and not the soldier, books and not kings, were to rule the world ; and weap- ons, forged in the mind, keen-edged and brighter than the sunbeam, were to supplant the sword and the battle- axe. The conflicts of the world were not to take place altogether on the tented field ; but Ideas, leaping from a world's awakened intellect, and burning all over with indestructible life, were to be marshalled against princi- palities and powers. The great and the good, whose influence before had been chiefly over individual minds, were now to be possessed of a magic, which, giving wings to their thoughts, would waft them, like so many- carrier doves, on messages of hope and deliverance to the nations. Words, springing fresh and bright from the soul of a master-spirit, and dropping into congenial hearts like so many sparks of fire, were no longer to lose this being with the vibrations of the air they disturbed, or moulder with the papyrus on which they were writ- ten, but were to be graven in everlasting characters, and rouse, strengthen, and illumine the minds of all ages. There was to be a stern death-grapple between Might and Right, — between the heavy arm and the ethereal thought, — between that which was and that which ought to be ; for there was a great spirit abroad in 38 AUTHORS. the world, whom dungeons could not confine, nor oceans check, nor persecutions subdue, — whose path lay through the great region of ideas, and whose dominion was over the mind. If such were the tendency of that great invention which leaped or bridged the barriers separating mind from mind and heart from heart, who shall calculate its effect in promoting private happiness ? Books, — light- houses erected in the great sea of time, — books, the precious depositories of the thoughts and creations of genius, — books, by whose sorcery times past become time present, and the whole pageantry of the world's history moves in solemn procession before our eyes ; — these were to visit the firesides of the humble, and lavish the treasures of the intellect upon the poor. Could we have Plato, and Shakspeare, and Milton, in our dwellings, in the full vigor of their imaginations, in the full freshness of their hearts, few scholars would be affluent enough to afford them physical support; but the living images of their minds are within the eyes of all. From their pages their mighty souls look out upon us in all their grandeur and beauty, undimmed by the faults and follies of earthly existence, consecrated by time. Precious and priceless are the blessings which books scatter around our daily paths. We walk, in imagination, with the noblest spirits, through the most sublime and enchanting AUTHORS. 39 regions, — regions which, to all that is lovely in the forms and colors of earth, " Add the gleam, The light that never was on sea or land, The consecration and the poet's dream." A motion of the hand brings all Arcadia to sight. The war of Troy can, at our bidding, rage in the narrowest chamber. Without stirring from our firesides, we may roam to the most. remote regions of the earth, or soar into realms where Spenser's shapes of unearthly beauty flock to meet us, where Milton's angels peal in our ears the choral hymns of Paradise. Science, art, literature, philosophy, — all that man has thought, all that man has done, — the experience that has been bought with the suf- ferings of a hundred generations, — all are garnered up for us in the world of books. There, among realities^ in a " substantial world," we move with the crowned kings of thought. There our minds have a free range, our hearts a free utterance. Reason is confined within none of the partitions which trammel it in life. The hard granite of conventionalism melts away as a thin mist. We call things by their right names. Our lips give not the lie to our hearts. We bend the knee only to the great and good. We despise only the despicable ; we honor only the honorable. In that world, no divinity hedges a king, 40 AUTHORS. no accident of rank or fashion ennobles a dunce, or shields a knave. There, and almost only there, do our affections have free play. We can select our compan- ions from among the most richly gifted of the sons of God, and they are companions who will not desert us in poverty, or sickness, or disgrace. ' When everything else fails, — when fortune frowns, and friends cool, and health forsakes us, — when this great world of forms and shows appears a " two-edged lie, which seems but IS not," — when all our earth-clinging hopes and ambi- tions melt away into nothingness, " Like snow-falls on a river, One moment white, then gone forever," — we are still not without friends to animate and console us, — friends, in whose immortal countenances, as they look out upon us from books, we can discern no change ; who will dignify low fortunes and humble life with their kingly presence; who will people solitude with shapes more glorious than ever glittered in palaces; who will consecrate sorrow and take the sting from care ; and who, in the long hours of despondency and weakness, will send healing to the sick heart, and energy to the wasted brain. Well might Milton exclaim, in that impassioned speech for the Liberty of Unlicensed Printing, where every word leaps with intellectual hfe, — "Who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's AUTHORS. 41 image ; but who destroys a good book kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye; Many a man lives a burden upon the earth; but a good book is the precious life-blood of a master spirit, em- balmed and treasured up on purpose for a life beyond life!" Library^ ^ Calif omia- LECTURE II.* NOVELS AND NOVELISTS . — CHARLES DICKENS. r Much has been said and written on the uses and abuses of fiction. Novel-writing and novel-reading have commonly been held in low estimation by grave and sensible people, or rather by people whose gravity has been received as the appropriate garment of sense. Many are both amused, and ashamed of being amused, / by this class of compositions ; and, accordingly, in the - libraries of well-regulated families, untouched volumes of history and philosophy glitter on prominent book- shelves in all the magnificence of burnished bindings, while the poor, precious novel, dog's-eared and wasted as it may be by constant handling, is banished to some secret but accessible nook, in order that its modest merit may not evoke polite horror. It thus becomes a kind of humble companion, whose prattle is pleas- * Delivered before the Boston Mercantile Library Association, December, 1844. NOVELS AND NOVELISTS. 43 ant enough when alone, but who must be cut in genteel company. And thus, many a person whose heart is beating hard in admiration of Mr. Richard Turpin's ride to York, or whose imagmation is filled with the image of Mr. James's solitary horseman slowly wending up the hill, still in public vehemently chatters on subjects with which he has no sympathy, and oil books which he has never read. Against good novels, that is, against vivid representa- tions or idealizations of life, character, and manners, in this or in any past age, there would seem to be no valid objection ; but this department of literature has unfor- tunately been a domain in which the whole hosts of folly, stupidity, and immorality, have encamped. A j good portion of the feeble things purporting to be novels are bad, and some of them execrably bad. Ink-wasters, who could write nothing else, whom nature never in- tended to write anything, have still considered them- selves abundantly qualified to write fiction; conse- quently, all the nonsense and fat-wittedness in poor perverted human nature have been fully represented in the congress of romance. Of all printed books that ever vexed the wise and charmed the foolish, a bad novel is probably that which best displays how far the mind can descend in the sliding scale of sense and nature. In the rt of embodying imbecility of thought and pettiness of 44 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : sentiment in a style correspondingly mean and gauzy, all other men and women have been fairly distanced by certain novelists, not altogether unblessed now with popularity and influence. This fact brings us to the distinctions existing between the widely different works classed under the common name of novels ; namely, novels written by men of genius; novels written by commonplace men j and novels written by dunces. Commonplace and stupid novels, and commonplace and stupid admirers of them, every community can boast of possessing ; but prose fictions of the higher class are rare. When, however, a man of genius embodies his mind in this form, it is ridiculous to allow any prejudice against the name to prevent us from acquiring the knowledge and enjoying the delight he is able to convey. If he be a great novelist, we may be sure that he has succeeded in a department of letters requiring a richly-gifted mind and heart, and that his success entitles him to some of the proudest honors of the intellect. f^ The novel, indeed, is one of the most effective, if not most perfect forms of composition, through which a com- prehensive mind can communicate itself to the world, exhibiting, as it may, through sentiment, incident, and character, a complete philosophy of life, and admitting a dramatic and narrative expression of the abstract princi • CHARLES DICKENS. 45 pies of ethics, metaphysics, and theology. Its range is theoretically as wide and deep as man and nature. Life is its subject, life in all its changes and modifications, by climate, by national and local manners, by conventional usages, by individual peculiarities, by distance in time and space, by every influence, in short, operating on the complex nature of man. It is the most difficult of aK modes of composition, for, in its perfection, it requires a mind capable of perceiving and representing all varieties of life and character, of being tolerant to all, and of real- izing them to the eye and heart with vivid and vital truth. The great novelist should be a poet, philosopher, and man of the world, fused into one. Understanding man as well as men, the elements of human nature as well as the laws of their combinations, he should possess the most extensive practical knowledge of society, the most universal sympathies with his kind, and a nature atonce shrewd and impassioned, observant and creative, with large faculties harmoniously balanced. His enthusi- asm should never hurry him into bigotry of any kind, not even into bigoted hatred of bigotry ; for, never appearing personally in his work as the champion of any of his characters, representing all faithfully, and studious to give even Satan his due, he must simply exhibit things in their right relations, and trust that morality of effect will result from truth of representation. I 46 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : It is evident that this exacting ideal of a novelist has never been realized. In most of the novels written by- men of powerful talents, we have but eloquent expres- sions of one-sided views of life. In some, the author represents himself, ideals of himself, and negations of himself, instead of mankind. Others are rhetorical ad- dresses, in favor of vice or virtue, religion or irrehgion, clumsily cast into a narrative and colloquial form, in which we have a view of the abstract feebly struggling after the concrete, but unable to achieve its laudable pur- pose. In some novels of a higher grade, we notice a predominance of the poetical, or philanthropic, or moral element, and though in these we may have pictures, the author constantly appears as showman. Perhaps Scott, of all novelists, approaches nearest to the ideal, as far as his perceptions in the material and spiritual world ex- tended. Whatever lay on the broad mirror of his imag- ination he fairly painted ; but there were many things which that rfiirror, glorious as it was, did not reflect. Fielding, within the range of his mind, approaches near absolute perfection ; and if he had possessed as keen a sense of the supernatural as the natural, he might have taken the hic^hest rank amonfj sfreat constructive and creative minds; but he had no elevation of soul, and little power of depicting it in imagination. As it is, however, the life-like reality of the characters and scenes CHARLES DICKENS. 4*7 he has painted, indicates that his genius was bounded by nothing but his sentiments. Perhaps the greatest single novel, judged by this standard of comprehensive- ness, is Goethe's Wilhelm Meister. It was the rich resuh of ten years' labor; and there is hardly a faculty of the mind, a feeling of the heart, or an aspiration of the soul, which has not contributed something to its interest, its value, or its beauty. Imagination, fancy, passion, humor, sentiment, understanding, observation, — the shrewdest practical wisdom, the loftiest idealism, the acutest and most genial criticism on art and litera- ture, the keenest satire on social foibles, — all have their place within the limits of one novel, without producing confusion or discord ; for they are all but ministers working the will of one self-conscious and far-darting in- telligence, that perceives with the clearest insight each shape and shade of many-colored life, without being swayed by any ; dehneating everything, yet seemingly advocating nothing; and allowing virtue and vice, knowl- edge and ignorance, enthusiasm and mockery, to meet and jostle, with a provoking indifference, apparently, to the triumph of either. But perhaps the range of the characterization, including, as it does, so many varying types of humanity, from the vulgar sensualist to the mystic pietist, is more to be admired than the felicity with which each is individualized; and the^ English 48 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : reader especially, while he cannot but wonder at the author's abundance of ideas, and be thrilled by the transcendent dramatic excellence displayed in the delin- eation of a few of the characters, will still miss that solid, substantial, indisputable personality he ever finds, not only in the creations of Shakspeare, but in those of Addison and Goldsmith, of Fielding and Scott. In Wilhelm Meister, we generally think more of the knowl- edge of man and nature we acquire through the charac- ters, than of the characters themselves, — a sign that the philosophic and the ideal have not been realized throughout with sufficient intensity to produce perfect forms of individual life. ^ Although English literature is now, in respect to novels of character and manners, the richest in the world, we still find that the novel had not acquired much eminence as a department of imaginative litera- ture until about the middle of the last century. Prose fiction was generally abandoned to writers who lacked the ability to embody their folly or indecency in verse. Richardson was the first man of genius who put forth his whole strength in this department of composition, and Fielding- beorin his admirable series of fictions rather with the design of ridiculing Richardson than of forming a new school of novelists. Smollett, without possessing Fielding's depth and geniality of nature, or Richardson's CHARLES DICKENS. 49 intense sentiment and hold upon the passions, still ex- hibited so large a knowledge of the world, such immense fertility of invention, such skill in the delineation of humorists, and such power in awakening both laughter and terror, that his works, though vitiated by the caustic bitterness of his temper, and by a misanthropic vulgarity calculated to inspire disgust rather than pleasure, have won for him a position side by side with Richardson and Fielding, as the founder of an influential school of nov- elists. Following these great men in rapid succession, came Sterne, Goldsmith, Charles Johnstone, Fanny Burney, Walpole, Clara Reeve, Robert Bage, Macken- zie, and Mrs. RadclifTe, each of them possessing a vein of originality, and- occupying some new department of fiction ; and two of them, Sterne and Goldsmith, estab- lishing a renown which promises to survive aU mutations of taste. As the tone of morality and delicacy in works of fiction varies with the moral variations of society, and as the Anglo-Saxon mind seems penetrated by an ine- radicable love of coarseness, the writings of many men- tioned on our list are not particularly characterized by decorum. Indeed, until Miss Burney began to write, in 1778, decency was not considered a necessary ingredient of romance. Richardson has a minute and ludicrously fonnal method of dwelling upon licentious situations, and Fielding and Smollett include a considerable amount of 4 50 NOVELS AKD NOVELISTS : profanity and ribaldry, which the least prudish reader must pronounce superfluous. The dunces, as a matter of course, adopted, with some additions, the vulgarity of their betters, and superadded large quantities of stupidity from their own minds. Novels, therefore, soon came under the ban of the religious and prudent ; anathemas were freely launched at them from the fireside and the pulpit; and parents might be excused for some bitter- ness of invective transcending the cool judgments of criticism, especially if a son was engaged in running the career of Peregrine Pickle, or a daughter was emulating the little eccentricities of Lady Betty Careless. But about the beginning of the present century, a new order of fictions came into fashion. As novelties com- monly succeed with the public, some enterprising authors tried the speculation of discarding indecency. Senti- mentality, the opposite evil, was substituted, and the dynasty of rakes was succeeded by the dynasty of flats. Lady Jane Brazenface, the former heroine, abdicated in favor of Lady Arabella Dieaway. The bold, free, reck- less libertine of the previous romances, now gave way to a lavendered young gentleman, the very pink and essence of propriety, faultless in features and in morals, and the undisputed proprietor of crushed aflfections and two thousand sterling a year. The inspiration of this tribe of novelists was love and weak tea ; the soul-shat- CHARLES DICKENS. 51 tering period of courtship was their field of action. Con- sidered as a mirror of actual life, this school was inferior to the worst specimens of that which it supplanted ; for the human race deserves this equivocal compliment to its intelligence, that it has more rogues than sentimentalists. , How^ever, the thing, bad as it was, had its day. Santo Sebastiano, Thaddeus of Warsaw, The Children of the Abbey, and other dispensations of a similar kind, exer- cised the despotism of sentimental cant over the circu- lating libraries, and their painfully perfect Matildas, Annas, Theresas, and Lauras, became the ideal of the sex. It is evident that these novels, as we see them now enveloped in their moistr atmosphere of sickly sensibility, required the smallest capital of intelligence that ever suf- ficed for the business of literature. A hero, whose duty it is to suffer impossible things and say foolish ones ; a heroine, oscillating between elegant miseries and gen- teel ecstacies ; a testy old father, from whom the gout occasionally forces a scrap of reason ; a talkative maiden aunt, who imagines the hero to be in love with herself; a pert chambermaid, who fibs and cheats for her mis- tress, and, at the same time, looks after some John or Peter on whom her own undying affections have settled ; and a deep villain, who is the only sensible person in the book; — these shadows of character, — w'hich the author has the impertinence to call men and women, — 62 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : joined to an unlimited power to create and demolish for- tunes, constitute' about all the matter we have been able to find in some scores of these novels. The style is bountifully sprinlded with a kind of interjectional pathos, consisting mainly of a frequent repetition of ah I and oh I The whole wretched mixture, despicable in every re- spect, still passed for many years, with far the largest portion of the reading public, for the genuine expression of the human heart and imagination. It is principally from this vapid class of novels that the contemporary parental objection to works of fiction has arisen. Even at the period of their popularity, they were mostly esteemed by persons at a certain age of life and a certain stage of intellectual development ; and there are doubtless many still living who can recollect the peevish disdain with which the master, and the vol- uble indignation with which the mistress, of a family, beheld their entrance into the house. But these fictions all fled, like mists before the sun, ■^ when Scott appeared with Waverley. Since then, the novel has risen to a new importance in literature, and exerted a great influence upon departments of intellect- ual labor with which it seems to have little in common. Thierry, one of the greatest of modern historians, con- fesses that the readinc: of Ivanhoe revealed to him the proper method of historical composition. From being CHARLES DICKENS. 53 the weak companion of the laziest hours of the laziest people, the novel, under the impulse it received from Scott, became the illustrator of history, the mirror and satirist of manners, the vehicle of controverted opinions in philosophy, politics, and religion. In its delineations of character and its romantic and heroical incidents, it took the place of the drama and the epic. But in becom- ing the most popular mode of communication with the public, it induced an indiscriminate rush of mediocrity and charlatanism into romance, so great as almost to overwhelm the talent and genius travelling in the same path. In addition to this multitude of rogues and dunces, there was another multitude of preachers and controver- sialists, eager to inculcate some system, good or bad, re- lating to other departments of literature, and who should have written treatises and sermons instead of novels. Mr. Plumer Ward desires to answer some arguments against Christianity, and forthwith publishes a novel. Professor Sewall has a disHke to the law of supply and demand, hates Lord John Russell and Sir Robert Peel, and con- V siders Romanists and Dissenters as criminals ; and the result of these opinions and antipathies is a novel. Dr. Croly desires to give a narrative of some political and military events, and to analyze the characters of some prominent statesmen, during the present century ; and accordingly declaims, rhapsodizes, and pastes the purple 64 NOVELS *AND NOVELISTS : patches of his rhetoric on a long colloquial dissertation, and calls the agglomeration a novel. There is, of course, no objection to the matter of their works, pro- vided it were treated dramatically ; but this substitution of opinions for characters and incidents, is altogether from the purpose of novel-writing. Of these various classes of fiction, that which, next to Scott's, attained for a few years the most popularity'- and influence, was the school of Bulwer, or the novel of fash- ionable life. The publication of Pelham heralded a new intellectual dynasty of fops and puppies. Bulwer's orig- inal idea of a hero was the greatest satire ever written by a man of talent on his own lack of mental elevation. He attempted to realize in a fictitious character his no- tion of what a man should be, and accordingly produced an agglomeration of qualities, called Pelham, in which the dandy, the scholar, the sentimentalist, the statesman, the ratlin and the blackguard, were all to be included in one "many-sided" man, whose merits would win equal applause from the hearty and the heartless, the lover and the libertine. Among these, however, the dandy stood preeminent; and scholarship, sentiment, politics, licen- tiousness, and ruffianism, were all bedizened in the frip- pery of Almacks. To this character Bulwer added another, who may be described in general terms as a man burning with hatred and revenge, misanthropical CHARLES DICKENS. 55 and moody, whose life had been blasted by some terrible wrong, and whose miserable hours were devoted to plots, curses, lamentations, and " convulsing" his face. These two types of character, the one unskilfully copied from Don Juan, the other from Lara, both of them Byronic as far as Bulwer could understand Byron, reappeared, like ghosts of ghosts, in most of his succeeding novels. How- ever much his mind may have grown, and his experi- ence of life increased, since his first plunge into romance, he has never yet fully emancipated himself from these original shackles. Indeed, Bulwer is rather an eloquent and accomplished rhetorician than a delineator of life and character. His intellect and feelings are both nar- rowed by his personal character, and things which clash with his individual tastes he criticizes rather than delin- eates. Everything that he touches is Bulwerized. A man of large acquirements, and ever ready to copy or pilfer from other authors, he discolors all that he borrows. The two sisters in Eugene Aram are copied directly from Scott's Minna and Brenda Troil, and their relative posi- tion is preserved ; but throughout there is manifested an inability to preserve the features of the originals in their purity, and accordingly their natural bloom soon changes to fashionable rouge. That a man thus without humor and dramatic imagination should be able to attain a wide reputation as a novelist, is a triumph of pretension 56 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : which must give delight to all engaged in experimenting on the discrimination of the public. If we compare him with any novelist possessing a vivid perception of the real, in actual or imaginary life, we see instantly the gulf which separates his splendid narrative essays from true novels ; and his unreal mockeries of men and wo- men, quickly passing from individualities into generaliz- ations, stand out as embodied opinions on life and char- acter, not representations of life and character. In regard to the question which has been raised as to the morality of Bulwer's fictions, it is hardly possible for any person who, in reading a book, is accustomed to observe the biases of the author's mind, to come but to one conclusion. Their general tendency is not 'only immoral, but it is evident that the writer plumes himself on being superior to that vulgar code of practical ethics which keeps society from falling to pieces ; and, in its place, favors us with a far more elegant system, of which the prominent principle is a morbid voluptuousness, com- pounded of sensuality and noble sentiments, and admit- ting many resounding epithets of virtue and religion, when they will serve either to dignify a meanness or point a period. To those who have no objection to devils provided they are painted, this peculiar form of morality may have its attractions. Considered in rela- tion to Bulwer's mind, it is one illustration of his defects CHARLES DICKENS. * 67 as a novelist, especially as indicating his lack of intel- lectual conscientiousness, of that fine sagacity which detects the false through all disguises, and seizes on the true and real with the felicity and speed of instinct Without this genius for the truth, no novelist can suc- ceed in a consistent exhibition of character ; and its absence in Bulwer is the cause of the unnatural mixture of vices and virtues in the personages of his novels. In the present day, at least, when immorality is not of itself a passport to popularity, moral obliquity ever indicates an intellectual defect. The success of Bulwer stirred the emulation of a crowd of imitators, and for a considerable period the domain of fiction was deluged by a flood of fashionable novels. Bulwer possessed shining talents, if not a kind of morbid genius ; but most of those who followed in his wake produced a class of vapid fictions, full of puppyism and conceit, illumined by hardly a ray of common sense or moral sense, and as unparalleled in their dulness as in their debility. How such dreary trash contrived to find readers, is one of those unexplained mental phenom- ena not solvable by any received theory of the mind. Fashionable life is, at the best, but a perversion of life, and represents human nature in one of its most unnat- ural attitudes; but still it is life, and affords a fair though limited field for light satire and sketchy charac- 58 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS: terization. The authorlings who essayed to deUneate it, from their parlors or their garrets, brought to the task a large stock of impudence and French phrases, perfect freedom from moral obligations, a weakness of feeling which it would be a compliment to call feminine, and an extensive acquaintance with the modes and mysteries of wearing apparel. The drawing-room and the boudoir, the coxcomb's drawl and the fine lady's simper, white waistcoats and top-boots, — these were their inspiring themes. The leading merit of these authors consisted in their complete knowledge of clothes; their leading defect, in forgetting to put men and women into them. Lady Montague, in reference to a titled family of her day named Hervey, said that God had created men, women, and Herveys. The fashionable novelists delin- eated the Herveys. About the time that this way of writing nonsense had lost its attractiveness, and every respectable critic wel- comed each new specimen of it with an ominous excla- mation of disgust, Charles Dickens appeared with the Pickwick Papers. The immediate and almost unprec- edented popularity he attained was owing not more to his own genius than to the general contempt for the school he supplanted. After ten years of conventional frippery and foppery, it was a relief to have once more a view of the earth and firmament, — to feel once more CHARLES DICKENS. 59 one of those touches of nature " which make the whole world kin." Here was a man, at last, with none of the daintiness of genteel society in his manner, belonging to no clique or sect, with sympathies embracing widely varying conditions of humanity, and whose warm heart and observant eye had been collecting from boyhood those impressions of man and nature which afterwards gushed out in exquisite descriptions of natural scenery, or took shape in his Pickwicks, Wellers, Vardens, Peck- sniffs, and their innumerable brotherhood. Dickens, as a novelist and prose poet, is to be classed in the front rank of the noble company to which he be- longs. He has revived the novel of genuine practical life, as it existed in the works of Fielding, Smollett, and Goldsmith, but at the same time has given to his mate- rials an individual coloring and expression peculiarly his own. His characters, like those of his great exemplars, constitute a world of their own, whose truth to nature every reader instinctively recognizes in connection with their truth to Dickens. Fielding delineates with more j exquisite art, standing more as the spectator of his per- sonages, and commenting on their actions with an ironi- cal humor, and a seeming innocence of insight, which pierces not only into but through their very nature, lay- ing bare their inmost unconscious springs of action, and in every instance indicating that he understands them 60 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : better than they understand themselves. It is this per- fection of knowledge and insight which gives to his novels their naturalness, their freedom of movement, and their value as lessons in human nature as well as con- summate representations of actual life. Dickens's eye for the forms of things is as accurate *as Fielding's, and his range of vision more extended ; but he does not probe so profoundly into the heart of what he sees, and he is more led away from the simplicity of truth by a tricksy spirit of fantastic exaggeration. Mentally he is indisputably below Fielding; but in tenderness, in pathos, in sweetness and purity of feeling, in that comprehen- siveness of sympathy which springs from a sense of brotherhood with mankind, he is as indisputably above him. The tendency of Dickens's genius, both in dehneating the actual and the imaginary, is to personify, to individu- alize. This makes his page all alive with character. Not only does he never treat of man in the abstract, but be gives personality to the rudest shows of nature, every- thing he touches becoming symbolic of human sympa- thies or antipathies. There is no \vriter more deficient in generalization. His comprehensiveness is altogether of the heart, but that heart, like the intelligence of Bacon's cosmopolite, is not " an island cut off from other men's lands, but a continent which joins to them." His obser CHARLES DICKENS. 61 vation of life thus beginning and ending with individuals, ' it seems strange that^ those highly sensitive and patriotic Americans who paid him the compliment of flymg into a passion with his peevish remarks on our institutions, should have overlooked the fact that his mind was alto- gether destitute of the generalizing qualities of a states- man, and that an angry humorist might have made equally ludicrous pictures of any existing society. When his work on America was quoted in the French Chamber of Deputies, M. de Tocqueville ridiculed the notion that any opinions of Mr. Dickens should be referred to in that place as authoritative. There is a great difference be- tween the criticism of a statesman and the laughter of a tourist, especially when the tourist laughs not from his heart, but his bile. The statesman passes over individ- ual peculiarities to seize on general principles, while the whole force of the other lies in the description of individ- ual peculiarities. Dickens, detecting with the nicest tact the foibles of men, and capable of setting forth our Be- vans, Colonel Tompkinses, and Jefferson Bricks, in all the comic splendor of humorous exaggeration, is still unqualified to abstract a general idea of national charac- ter from his observation of persons. A man immeasur- ably inferior to him in creative genius might easily excel him in that operation of the mind. Indeed, were Dickens's understanding as comprehensive as his heart, 62 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : and as vigorous as his fancy, he would come near realiz- ing the ideal of a novelist ; but, as.it is, it is as ridicu- lous to be angry with any generalizations of his on American institutions and politics, as it would be to inveigh against him for any heresies he might blunder into about innate ideas, the freedom of the will, or origi- nal sin. Besides, as Americans, we have a decided advantage over our transatlantic friends, even in the matter of being caricatured by the novelist whom both are rivals in admiring ; for certainly, if there be any character in which Dickens has seized on a national trait, that character is Pecksniff, and that national trait is English. The whole originality and power of Dickens lies in this instinctive insight into individual character, to which we have already referred. He has gleaned all his facts from observation and sympathy, in a diligent scrutiny of actual life, and no contemporary author is less in- debted to books. His style is all his own, its quaint texture of fancy and humor being spun altogether from his own mind-, with hardly a verbal felicity which bears the mark of being stolen. In painting character he is troubled by no uneasy sense of himself. When he is busy with Sam Weller or Mrs. Nickleby, he forgets Charles Dickens. Not taking his own character as the test of character, but entering with genial warmth into CHARLES DICKENS. 63 the pecaliarities of others, and making their joys and sorrows his own, his perceptions are not bounded by his personality, but continually apprehend and interpret new forms of individual being; and thus his mind, by the readiness with which it genially assimilates other minds, and the constancy with which it is fixed on objects exter- nal to itself, grows with every exercise of its powers. By this felicity of nature, the man who began his lit- erary life with a condemned farce, a mediocre opera, and some slight sketches of character, written in a style which but feebly indicated the germs of genius, produced before the expiration of eight years. The Pickwick Pa- pers, Oliver Twist, Nicholas* Nickleby, The Old Curi- osity Shop, and Martin Chuzzlewit, in a continually ascending scale of intellectual excellence, and achieved a fame not only gladly recognized wherever the English tongue was spoken, but which extended into France, Germany, Italy, and Holland, and caused the translation of his works into languages of which he hardly under- stood a word. Had he been an egotist, devoured by a ravenous vanity for personal display, and eager to print the image of himself on the popular imagination, his talents would hardly have made him known beyond the street in which he lived, and his mind by self-admi- ration would soon have been self-consumed. His fellow- feeling with his race is his genius. 64 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS. The humanity, the wide-ranging and heahhy sympa- thies, and, especially, the recognition of the virtues which obtain among the poor and humble, so observable in the works of Dickens, are in a great degree charac- teristic of the age, and without them popularity can hardly be won in imaginative literature. The sentiment of humanity, indeed, or a hypocritical affectation of it, has become infused into almost all literature and speech, from the sermons of Dr. Channing to the feuilletons of Eugene Sue. It is exceedingly difficult for a man to be as narrow as he could have been had he lived a century ago. No matter how bigoted may be the tendencies of his nature, no matter how'strong may be his desire to dwell in a sulky isolation from his race, he cannot breathe the atmosphere of his time without feeling occa- sionally a generous sentiment springing to his lips, with- out perceiving occasionally a liberal opinion stealing into his understanding. He cannot creep into any nook or comer of seclusion, but that some grand sentiment or noble thought will hunt him out, and surprise his soul with a disinterested emotion. In view of this fact, a bigot, who desires to be a man of the tenth century, who strives conscientiously to narrow his intellect and shut his heart, who mumbles the exploded nonsense of past tyranny and exclusiveness, but who is still forced into some accommodation to the spirit of the age in which he CHARLES DICKENS. 65 lives, is worthy rather of the tender commiseration than the shrewish invective of the philanthropists whom he hates but imitates. Now Dickens has an open sense for all the liberal influences of his time, and commonly surveys human nature from the position of charity and love. For the foibles of character he has a sort of laughing toleration ; an4 goodness of heart, no matter how overlaid with ludi- crous weaknesses, has received from him its strongest and subtlest manifestations. He not only makes us love our kind in its exhibitions of moral beauty, but also when frailties mingle with its excellence. Distinguish- ing, with the instinctive tact of genius, the moral differ- ences of persons and actions, and having a nicely ad- justed scale of the degrees of folly and wickedness, not one of his characters is just as wise or as foolish, as good or as bad, as another ; and he also contrives to effect that reconciliation of charity and morality, by which our sympathies with weakness and toleration of error never run into a morbid sentimentality. He deals in no soph- • istries to make evil appear good, and the worse the bet- ter reason. He does not, as Bulwer is apt to do, dress up a crowd of sharpers and adulterers in the purple and fine linen of rhetoric, and then demand us to wish them well in their business, — an example of abstinence from a common peccadillo of romancers worthy of especial 5 ^J NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : praise in an ap;e which appreciates George Sand aiii Dumas. If he refrains from thus superadding noble sen- timents to animal appetites, he evolves, with a sagacity V in which he is only excelled by Wordsworth, beautiful and heroic qualities from humble souls, disguised though they may be in unsightly forms, and surrounded by gro- tesque accompaniments. He makes the fact that happi- ness and virtue are not confined to any one class a real- ity to the mind ; and, by shedding over his pictures the consecrations of a heart full of the kindliest sympathies," " Rustic life and poverty Grow beautiful beneath his touch." Kit Nubbles, in the Old Curiosity Shop, is a pertment example, among numerous others, of this searching hu- manity of Dickens. Here is a boy, rough, uneducated, ill-favored, the son of a washer-w^oman, the very opposite of a common novelist's idea of the interestino^, with a name which at once suggests the ludicrous ; yet, as enveloped in the loving humor of Dickens, he becomes a person of more engrossing interest and affection than a thousand of the stereotyped heroes of fiction. We not only like him, but the whole family, Mrs. Nubbles, Jacob, the baby and all ; and yet nothing is overcharged in the description, and every circumstance calculated to make Kit an object for laughter is freely used. The materials CHARLES DICKENS. 67 for numberless characters equally as interesting are within the reach of all novelists ; but most of them are ridden by some nightmare of dignity or gentility, which compels them to pass by the hero in the alley for some, piece of etiquette and broadcloth in the drawing-room It is not the least of Dickens's merits that he excelled all his contemporaries, not by attempting to rival them on their own selected vantage-ground, but by availing him- self of matter which they deemed only worthy of pitying contempt. He introduced the people of England to its aristocracy ; and though there were not wanting dainty and vulgar spirits to call his novels " low," he soon not only gained the popular voice, but he overthrew the fashionable novelists in their own circles, and his Wel- lers and Smvellers, edging their way into boudoirs and parlors, supplanted Pelhams and Cecils in the estimation of countesses. In thus representing life and character, there are two characteristics of his genius which startle every reader by their obviousness and power, — humor and pathos ; but, in respect to the operation of these qualities in his delineations, critics have sometimes objected that his humor is apt to run into fantastic exaggeration, and his pathos into sentimental excess. Indeed, in regard to his humorous characters, it may be said that the vivid inten- ity with which he conceives them, and the overflowing 68 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : abundance of joy and merriment which springs instmcf- ively up from the very fountains of his being at the slightest hint of the ludicrous, sometimes lead him to the very verge of caricature. He seems hunself to be taken by surprise, as his glad and genial fancies throng into his brain, and to laugh and exult with the beings he has called into existence, in the spirit of a man observing, not creating. Squeers and Pecksniff, Sim Tappertit and Mark Tapley, Tony Weller and old John Willett, although painted with such distinctness that we seem to see them with the bodily eye, we stiU feel to be some- what overcharged in the description. They are carica- tured more in appearance than reality, and if grotesque in form, are true and natural at heart. Such caricature as this is to character what epigram is to fact, — a mode of conveying truth more distinctly by suggesting it through a brilliant exaggeration. When we say of a man, that he goes for the greatest good of the greatest number, but that the greatest number to him is number one, we express the fact of his selfishness as much as though we said it in a literal way. The mind of the reader unconsciously limits the extravagance into which Dickens sometimes runs, and, indeed, discerns the actual features and lineaments of the character shining the more clearly through it. Such extravagance is com- monly a powerful stimulant to accurate perception, espec- CHARLES DICKENS. 69 ially to readers who lack fineness and readiness of intel- lect. It is not that caricature which has no foundation but in '* The extravagancy And crazy ribaldry of fancy ;" but caricature based on the most piercing insight into actual life ; so keen, indeed, that the mind finds relief or pleasure in playing with its 0A\'n conceptions. Shak- speare often condescends to caricature in this way, and so do Cervantes, Hogarth, Smollett, and Scott. Though it hardly approaches our ideal of fine characterization, it has its justification in the almost universal practice of men whose genius for humorous delineation cannot be . questioned. That Dickens is not led into this vein of exaggeration by those qualities of wit and fancy which make the cari- caturist, is proved by the solidity with which his works rest on the deeper powers of imagination and humor. A caricaturist rarely presents anything but a man's peculi- arity, but Dickens ever presents the man. He so pre- serves the keeping of character that everything said or done by hrs personages is either on a level with the original conception or develops it. They never go be- yond the pitch of thought or feeling by which their per- sonality is limited. Thus, Tony Weller, whose round • fat body seems to roll about in a sea of humor, makes us NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : laugh at his sayings as much because he says them as for any merriment they contain in themselves. His oddities of remark are sufficiently queer to excite laugh- ter, but they receive their peculiar unction from his con- ception of his own importance and his belief in the unreachable depths of his own wisdom. Mr. Pickwick compliments the intelligence of his son Sam. " Werry glad to hear of it, sir," he replies ; " I took a great deal o' pains in his eddication, sir; let him run the streets when he wos very young, and shift for hisself. It 's the only way. to make a boy sharp, sir." His infallibility in matters relating to matrimony and widows is a good instance of the method in which a novelist may produce ludicrous effect by emphasizing an oddity of opinion, and at the same time connect it with the substance of char- acter. When Sam sends the Valentine to Mary, the old man's forecasting mind sees the consequences, and he bursts out in that affecting rebuke, — " To see you married, Sammy, to see you a deluded wictim, and thinkin' in your innocence it 's all werry capital. It 's a dreadful trial to a father's feelin's, that 'ere, Sammy." He is troubled by an obstinate suspicion that he himself is especially marked out as an object for the machina- tions of widows. In a contemptuous account of a jour- ney he made on a railroad, he says, " I wos locked up in a close carriage with a living widdur ; and I believe CHARLES DICKENS. 71 it wos only because we wos alone, and there wos no clergyman in the conweyance, that that 'ere widdur did n't marry me before we reached the half-way sta- tion." He is a coachman of forty years, standing, and accordingly has a wise scorn of all railroads. " As for the ingein," he says, " as is always a pourin' out red hot coals at night, and black smoke in the day, the sensiblest thing it does, in my opinion, is ven there 's something in the vay, and it sets up that frightful scream vich seems to say, now here 's two hundred and forty passengers in the weriy greatest extremity of danger, and here 's their two hundred and forty screams in vun." He is, indeed, the very Lord Burleigh of low life ; and from those par- oxysms of inward chuckles, — which generally termi- nated in " as near an approach to a choke as an elderly gentleman can with safety sustain," — through all the variety of his. sayings and doings, to his earnest exhor- tation that Sam should spell Weller with a V, he never loses his substantial personality, never becomes anything but Tony Weller. Much of Dickens's most exquisite and most exube- rant humor is displayed in representing characters com- pounded of vanity, conceit, and assurance. His Artful Dodgers and Mr. Baileys are cases in point. They re- mind you of the child who ran away from his parents when he was only a year old, because he understood 72 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS :• > they intended to call him Caleb. The little, thievish, ragged Dodger, when brought before the police court, points to the judge, and politely requests to be informed " who is that old file up there ;" and warns the court not to keep him long, as he has an engagement to dine with the " wice-president of the House of Commons." This conceit, varied according to age and character, mingles with the other peculiarities of the two Wellers, John Wil- lett, Mr. Mantahni, and a score of others. There is Sim Tappertit, the sublime apprentice, conceit and bathos embodied, who is troubled by his soul's getting into his head, and disturbed by " inward workings after a higher calling" than making locks. Mr. Kenwigs, in Nicholas Nickleby, is an elderly Tappertit, whose discourse is pitched on a more uniform key of fustian. But Mr. Richard Swiveller is probably the most splendid speci- men of the class, and is a fine example* of the felicity with which Dickens can tread the dizziest edges of char- acterization without sinking into mere caricature. Dick is a sort of shabby Sir Harry Wildair, a reckless, feather-brained, good-natured vagabond, with no depth of guile, and whose irregularities are the result of idle- ness, vanity, egotism, and a great flow of spirits. With a vast opinion of his own abilities, he is still overreached by every knave he encounters, and his life is accordingly a descent from one " crusher" to another. He is so vain CHARLES DICKENS. 73 that he almost believes his own self-exalting lies ; and he cannot possibly see things as they are. When the old grandfather is disturbed by the demands of his graceless grandson for money, Dick is very much surprised that the "jolly old grandfather should decline to fork out with that cheerful readiness which is always so pleasant and agreeable at his time of life," His head is full of scraps of songs and plays, which he has a singular felic- itous infelicity in quoting to sustain the sentiment of the moment ; and his slang, ever accompanying his sen- timent, is as characteristic as the soil on his Imen, or the marks of Time's " effacing fingers" on his flash coat. When jilted by Miss Wackles. he says, in parting, " I go away with feelings that may be conceived, but cannot be described, feeling within myself the desolating truth that ray best affections have received this night a sti- fler ;" but he then adds, from the promptings of his vanity, and with reference to his proposed suit to little Nell, " that a young girl of wealth and beauty is grow- ing up at the present moment for me, and has requested her next of kin to propose for my hand, which, having a kindness for some members of her family, I have con- sented to promise. It's a gratifying circumstance, that you '11 be glad to hear, that a young and lovely girl is growing into a woman expressly on my account, and is now savmg up for me." Dick's imaginative vanity 74 NOVELS AND A'OVELISTS : absolutely deceives his own senses. He calls a fight, in which his own face is damaged, a festive scene; he asks his companion in punch to pass the rosj wine ; he pays for his liquor by solemnly advising the boy at the bar never to touch spirits ; and tells a stranger, whom he designs to dupe, that the wing of friendship must not moult a feather. Sir Epicure MarmPion himself hardiy realizes with more fulness his c:oro:eous visions of dut- tony and avarice, than the images of all that is unreal in dissipation succeed each other as facts in poor Dick's helter-skelter brain. Among the various cliaracters of Dickens, there is one class, which, disagreeing in many things, agree in being the tormentors of social life. They are persons whom the law does not touch, but, compared with some of them, highwaymen may be considered public benefac- tors. As ladies always have the precedence, we will pass over the currish attorney. Brass, and the coarse scoundrel, Squeers; the snapping, hissing hatred of Quilp, and the creamy villany of Pecksniff; in order to do fit honor to that miracle of mingled weakness, pru- dery, and malice, the incomparable Miss Miggs. She is an elderly maiden, who, by some strange neglect on the part of mankind, has been allowed to remain unmar- ried. This neglect might in some small degree be ac- counted for by the fact that her person and disposition CHARLES DICKENS. 75 came within the range of Mr. Tappertit's epithet of " scraggy." She had various ways of wreaking her hatred upon the other sex, the most cruel of which was in often honoring them with her compan}^ and discourse. Her feeling for the wrongs of woman was deep and strong, and she had been known to wish that the whole race would die off, that men might be brought to appre- ciate the real value of the blessings by which they set so little store ; and averred, " if she could obtain a fair round number of virgins, say ten thousand, to follow her example, she would, to spite manldnd, hang, drown, stab, or poison herself, with a joy past expression." When she watches at the window for the return of Sim Tap- pertit, with the intention of betraying him, she is de- scribed as " having an expression of face in which a great number of opposite ingredients, such as mischief, cunning, malice, triumph, and patient expectation, were all mixed up together in a kind of physiognomical punch ;" and as composing herself to wait and listen, " like some fair ogress, who has set a trap, and was waiting for a nibble from a plump young traveller." Dickens, in this character, well represents how such seemingly insignificant malignants as Miss Miggs can become the pest of families ; and that, though full of weakness and malignity, they can be proud of their vir- 76 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : tue and religion, and make slander the prominent ele- ment of their pious conversation. Y' Few novelists excel in the finer shades of character, in the exhibition of those minor traits which the eye of genius alone can detect. Much of the most refined humor of Dickens comes from his insight into the subtle- ties of the ludicrous. This penetration of vision is often shown when the humor seems broad even to farcical excess, and especially when he makes a transparent ' hypocrite speak as if he were playing a deep game. Squeers, for instance, is a thoroughly vulgar rascal, but he has a dim sense that some men are swayed by moral and sympathetic considerations, and he accordingly adopts what he deems the language of virtue and reli- gion when he intends some peculiarly infamous trick. His mode of translating morality and affection into his own vocabulary of villany is richly ludicrous. WTien his hopeful son. Master Wackford Squeers, catches poor Smike, the exulting parent exclaims, — "You always keep on the same path, and do things that you see your father do, and when you die you will go right slap to heaven, and be asked no questions." Snawley and Squeers know each other to be scoundrels, yet they ever preserve in their colloquies a clumsy affectation of senti- ment and conscience. Snawley, who is hired to entrap poor Smike, effects his purpose by claiming the boy as CHARLES DICKENS. 77 his son. When he meets Squeers he indulges in a com- mendable strain of snivelling eloquence on the beauty of natural affection. " It only shows what natur is, sir,'* said Mr. Squeers. " She 's a rum 'un, is natur." — " She is a holy thing," murmured Snawley. — "I believe you," added Mr. Squeers, with a moral sigh ; " I should like to know how we could get along without her. Natur," he said, growing solemn, " is more easily conceived than described. ! what a blessed thing, sir, to be in a state of natur." Brass, in the Old Curiosity Shop, a knave com- pounded of hawk and puppy, who fawns, cheats, and sentimentalizes through the whole book, has become so accustomed to this grotesque affectation of excellence, that it always flows from his lips when he speaks with- out reflection. He lays a trap to make poor Kit Nubbles appear a thief, and really appears measurelessly horror- stricken when the money is found in the boy's posses- sion. " And this," he cries, clasping his hands, " this is the world, that turns upon its own axis, and has lunar influences, and revolutions round heavenly bodies, and various games of that sort ! This is human natur, is it ? " Pecksniff, again, is so thoroughly impregnated with the spirit of falsehood, that he is , moral even in drunkenness, and canting even in shame and discovery. Much of the humor of Dickens is identical with his 78 NOVELS AND NOVELISTS I Style. In this the affluence of his fancy in suggestive phrases and epithets is finely displayed ; and he often flashes the impression of a character or a scene upon the \^mind by a few graphic verbal combinations. Vv'^hen Ralph Nicldeby says " God bless you," to his nephew, " the words stick in his thoat, as if unused to the pas- sage." When Tigg clasped Mr. Pecksniff in the dark, that worthy gentleman " found himself collared by some- thing which smelt like several damp umbrellas, a barrel of beer, a cask of warm brandy and water, and a small parlor full of tobacco-smoke, mixed." Mrs. Todgers, when she desires to make Ruth Pinch know her station, surveys her with a look of "genteel grimness." A widow of a deceased brother of Martin Chuzzlewit is described as one, who, " being almost supernaturally dis- agreeable, and having a dreary face, a bony figure, and a masculine voice, was, in right of these qualities, called a strong-minded woman." Mr. Richard Swiveller no sooner enters a room than the nostrils of the company are saluted by a strong smell of gin and lemon-peel. Mr. George Chuzzlewit, a person who over-fed himself, is sketched as a gentleman with such an obvious dispo- sition to pimples, that " the bright spots on his cravat, the rich pattern of his waistcoat, and even his glittering trinkets, seemed to have broken out upon him, and not to have come into existence comfortably." Felicities like CHARLES DICKENS. 79 these, Dickens squanders with a prodigality which re- duces their relative value, and makes the generality of style-mongers poor indeed. It is difficult to say whether Dickens is more success- ful in humor or pathos. Many prefer his serious to his comic scenes. It is certain that his genius can as read- ily draw tears as provoke laughter. Sorrow, want, pov- erty, pain, and death ; the affections which cling to earth and .those which rise above it ; he represents always with power, and often with marvellous skill. His style, in the serious moods of his mind, has a harmony of flow which often glides unconsciously into metrical arrange- ment ; and is full of those words " Which fall as soft as snow on the sea, And melt iu the heart as instantly." One source of his pathos is the intense and purified con- ception he has of moral beauty, of that beauty which comes from a thoughtful brooding over the most solemn and affecting realities of life. The character of little Nell is an illustration. The simplicity of this creation, framed as it is from the finest elements of human nature, and the unambitious mode of its development through the motley scenes of the Old Curiosity Shop, are calcu- lated to make us overlook its rare merit as a work of high poetic genius. Amid the wolfish malignity of Quilp, the sugared meanness of Brass, the roaring con- 80 . NOVELS AND NOVELISTS .* viviality of Swiveller, amid scenes of selfishness and shame, of passion and crime, this delicate creation moves along, unsullied, purified, pursuing the good in the sim- ple earnestness of a pure heart, gliding to the tomb as to a sweet sleep, and leaving in every place that her pres- ence beautifies the marks of celestial footprints. Sor- rows such as hers, over which so fine a sentiment sheds its consecrations, have been well said to be ill-bartered for the garishness of joy ; " for they win us softly from life, and fit us to die smiling." In addition to this reiined perception of moral beauty, he has great tragic power. It would be useless, in our limits, to attempt to give illustrations of his closeness to nature in delineating the deeper passions ; his profound observation of the workings of the soul when stained with crime and looking forward to death ; his skill in gifting remorse, fear, avarice, hatred and revenge, with their appropriate language ; and his subtle appreciation of the influence exercised by different moods of the mind in modifying the appearances of external objects. In these the poet always appears through the novelist, and we hardly know whether imagination cr observation con- tributes most to the effect. In closing these desultory remarks on Dickens, and the department of literature of which he is the greatest ' living representative, it may not be irrelevant to express CHARLES DICKENS. 81 a regret that we have not a class of novels illustrative .^f American life and character, which does some justice to both. Novelists we have in perilous abundance, as Egypt had locusts ; some of them unexcelled in the art of preparing a dish of fiction by a liberal admixture of the horrible and sentimental ; and some few who display talents and accompHshments of a higher order; but a series of national novels, illustrative of the national life, the production of men penetrated with an American spirit without being Americanisms, we can hardly plume ourselves upon possessing. The American has hereto- fore appeared in romance chiefly to be libeled or cari- catured. He has been represented as an acute knave, expressing the sentiments of a worldling in the slang of An ale-house, and principally occupied in peddling Con- necticut nutmegs, wooden clocks, and tin ware. That Sam Slick, Ninirod Wildfire, and the Ethiopian Min- strels, do not comprehend the whole wealth and raciness of life as it is in the North, the South, and the West, might easily be demonstrated if a man of power would undertake the task. But one would almost suppose, from hearing the usual despairing criticism of the day, that in the United States the national novel was an impossible creation. Are there, then, no materials here for the romantic and heroic, — nothing over which poe- try can lovingly hover, — nothing of sorrow for pathos to 6 82' NOVELS AND NOVELISTS : convert into beauty, — no fresh individualities of disposi- tion over w^hich humor, born of pathos, can pour its floods of genial mirth, — no sweet household ties, no domestic affections, no high thoughts, no great passions, no sorrow, sin, and death ? Has our past no story to tell ? Is there nothing of glory in the present, nothing of hope in the future ? In no country, indeed, is there a broader field opened to the delineator of character and manners than in our own land. Look at our society, the only society where the whole people are alive, — alive with intelligence and passion, — every man's indi- vidual life mingling with the life of the nation, — ava- rice, cruelty, pride, folly, ignorance, in a ceaseless con- test with great virtues, and noble aims, and thoughts that reach upward to the ideal. In the noise and tumult of that tremendous struggle, a man of genius not blinded by its dust or deafened by its din, at once an actor in life and a spectator of it, might discover the materials of the deepest tragedy and the finest and broadest humor; might hear, amid the roar and confusion, the " still, sad music of humanity ;" might see, through all the rancor and madness of partisan warfare, the slow evolution of right principles ; might send his soul along that tide of impetuous passion in which novelties are struggling with prejudices, without being overwhehned in its foaming flood ; and in the comprehensive grasp of his intellect CHARLES DICKENS. 83 might include all ciasses, all sects, all professions,' mak- ing them stand out on his luminous page in the clear light of reality, doing justice to all by allowing each its own costume and language, compelling Falsehood to g^ve itself the lie, and Pride to stand abased before its own image, and guided in all his pictures of life and character by a spirit at once tolerant, just, generous, humane, and national. LECTURE III.* WIT AND HUMOR. It has been justly objected to New England society, that it is too serious and prosaic. It cannot take a joke. It demands the reason of all things, or their value in the current coin of the land. It is nervous, fidgety, unre- posing, full of trouble. Striving hard to make even reli- gion a torment, it clothes in purple and fine linen its apostles of despair. Business is followed with such a devouring intensity of purpose, that it results as often in dyspepsia as in wealth. We are so overcome with the serious side of things, that our souls rarely come out in irrepressible streams of merriment. The venerable King Cole would find few subjects here to acknowledge his monarchy of mirth. In the foppery of our utilitarianism, we would frown down all recreations which have not a logical connection with mental improvement or purse improvement. For those necessary accompaniments of * Delivered before the Boston JMercantile Library Association, December, 1845. WIT AND HUMOR. 85 all life out of the Insane Asylum, — qualities which the most serious and sublime of Christian poets has described with the utmost witchery of his fancy, — " duips, and cranks, and wanton wiles, Nods, and becks, and wreathed smiles. Sport, that wrinkled Care derides, And Laughter holding both his sides," — for these we have the suspicious glance, the icy speech, the self-involved and mysterious look. We are gulled by all those pretences which require a vivid sense of the ludicrous to be detected ; and with all our boasted intel- ligence, there is hardly a form of quackery and fanati- cism which does not thrive better by the side of our schools and colleges than anywhere else. And the reason is, we lack generally the faculty or feeling of ridicule, — the counterfeit-detector all over the world. We have, perhaps, sufficient respect for the great, the majestic, and the benevolent ; but we are deficient in the humorous insight to detect roguery and pretence under their external garbs. As we cannot laugh at our own follies, so we cannot endure being laughed at. A Grub- street scribbler, tossing at us from a London garret a few lightning-bugs of jocularity, can set our whole pop- ulation in h, flame. Public indignation is the cheapest article of domestic manufacture. There is no need of a tariff to protect that. We thus give altogether too much 86 WIT AND HUMOR. importance to unimportant things, — breaking butterflies on the wheel, and cannonading grasshoppers ; and our dignity continually exhales in our spasmodic efforts to preserve it. Now it is an undoubted fact that the principle of Mirth is as innate in the mind as any other original faculty. The absence of it, in individuals or communi- ties, is a defect ; for there are various forms of error and imposture which wit, and wit alone, can expose and punish. Without a well-trained capacity to perceive the ludicrous, the health suffers, both of the body and the mind; seriousness dwindles into asceticism, sobriety degenerates into bigotry, and the natural order of things gives way to the vagaries of distempered imaginations. " He who laughs," said the mother of Goethe, " can com- mit no deadly sin." The Emperor Titus thought he had lost a day if he had passed it without laughing. Sterne contends that every laugh lengthens the term of our lives. Wisdom, which represents the marriage of Truth and Virtue, is by no means synonymous with gravity. She is L'AUegro as well as II Penseroso, and jests as well as preaches. The wise men of old have sent most of their morality down the stream of time in the light skiff of apothegm or epigram ; and the proverbs of nations, which embody the common-sense of nations, have the brisk concussion of the most sparkling wit. Almost WIT AND HUMOR. 87 every sensible remark on a folly is a witty remark. Wit is thus often but the natural language of wisdom, view- ing life with a piercing and passionless eye. Indeed, nature and society are so replete with startling contrasts, that wit often consists in the mere statement and com- parison of facts ; as when Hume says, that the ancient Muscovites wedded their wives with a whip instead of a ring ; as when Voltaire remarks, that Penn's treaty with the Indians was the only one ever made between civil- ized men and savages not sanctioned by an oath, and the only one that ever was kept. In the same vein of wise sarcasm is the observation that France under the Ancient Regime was an absolute monarchy moderated by songs, and that Russia is a despotism tempered by assassination ; or the old English proverb, that he who preaches war is the devil's chaplain. In view of this ludicrous side of things, perceived by Wit and Humor, I propose in this lecture to discourse of Mirth, — its philosophy, its literature, its influence. The breadth of the theme forbids a complete treatment of it, for to Wit and Humor belong much that is impor- tant in history and most agreeable in letters. The mere mention of a few of the great wits and humorists of the world will show the extent of the subject, viewed simply in its literary aspect ; for to Mirth belong the exhaust- less fancy and sky-piercing buffooneries of Aristophanes ; 88 WIT AND HUMOR. the matchless irony of Lucian ; the stem and terrible satire of Juvenal ; the fun-drunken extravagances of Kabelais ; the self-pleased chuckle of Montaigne ; the farcical caricature of Scarron ; the glowing and spark- ling verse of Dryden ; the genial fun of Addison ; the scoffing subtilties of Butler ; the aerial merriment of Sterne ; the hard brilliancy and stinging emphasis of Pope ; the patient glitter of Congreve ; the teasing mockery of Voltaire ; the polished sharpness of Sheridan ; the wise drolleries of Sydney Smith ; the sly, shy, elu- sive, ethereal humor of Lamb ; the short, sharp, flashing scorn of Macaulay ; the careless gayety of Beranger ; the humorous sadness of Hood ; and the comic creations, various almost as human nature, which have peopled the» imaginations of Europe with everlasting forms of the ludicrous, from the time of Shakspeare and Cervantes to that of Scott and Dickens. Now all these writers either represented or influenced their age. Their works are as valuable to the historian as to the lover of the comic ; for they show us what people in difTerent ages laughed at, and thus indicate the periods at which forms of faith and government, and social follies and vices, passed from objects of reverence or respect into subjects of ridicule and contempt. And only in Dr. Barrow's celebrated description of facetiousness, " the greatest proof of mastery over language," says Mackintosh, "ever WIT AND HUMOR. 89 given by an English writer," can be represented the manifold forms and almost infinite . range of their mirth. " Sometimes it lieth in pat allusion to a known story, or in seasonable application of a trivial saying, or in forging an apposite tale ; sometimes it playeth in words and phrases, taking advantage from the ambiguity of their sense or the affinity of their sound ; sometimes it is wrapped up in a dress of humorous expression ; some- times it lurketh under an odd similitude ; sometimes it is lodged in a sly question, in a smart answer, in a quirkish reason, in a shrewd intimation, in cunningly diverting or cleverly retorting an objection ; sometimes it is couched in a bold scheme of speech, in a tart irony, in a lusty hyperbole, in a startling metaphor, in a plau- sible reconciling of contradictions, or in acute nonsense ; sometimes a scenical representation of persons or things, a counterfeit speech, a mimical look or gesture, passeth for it; sometimes an affected simplicity, sometimes a presumptuous bluntness, giveth it being ; sometimes it riseth only from a lucky hitting upon what is strange ; sometimes from a crafty wresting obvious matter to the purpose. Often it consisteth in one hardly knows what, and springeth up one can hardly tell how, being answer- able to the numberless rovings of fancy and windings of language." To this description, at once so subtle and so compre- 90 WIT AND HUMOR. hensive, little can be added. It remains, however, to indicate some characteristics which separate wit from humor. Neither seems a distinct faculty of the mind, but rather a sportive exercise of intellect and fancy, directed by the sentiment of Mirth, and changing its character with the variations of individual passions and peculiarities. The essence of the ludicrous consists in surprise, — in unexpected turns of feeling and explosions of thought, — often by bringing dissimilar things together with a shock ; — as when some wit called Boyle, the celebrated philosopher, the father of Chemistry and brother of the Earl of Cork ; or as when the witty editor of a penny paper took for the motto of his journal, — " The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, the price of the Star is only one cent." When Northcote, the sculp- tor, was asked what he thought of George the Fourth, he answered that he did not know him. " But," persisted his querist, " his majesty says he knows you." " Know me," said Northcote, " pooh ! pooh ! that's all his brag !" Again, Phillips, while travelling in this country, said that he once met a republican so furious against mon- archs that he would not even wear a crown to his hat. The expression of uncontrolled self-will is often witty as well as wicked, from this element of unexpectedness. Peter the Great, observing the number of lawyers in "Westminster Hall, remarked that he had but two la\vyers WIT AND HUBIOR. 91 in his whole dominions, and that he intended to hang one of them as soon as he got home. "Wit was originally a general name for all the intel- lectual powers, meaning the faculty which kens, per- ceives, knows, understands ; it was gradually narrowed in its signification to express nierely the resemblance between ideas ; and lastly, to note that resemblance when it occasioned ludicrous surprise. It marries ideas, lying wide apart, by a sudden jerk of the understanding. Humor originally meant moisture, a signification it met- aphorically retains, for it is the very juice of the mind, oozing from the brain, and enriching and fertilizing wherever it falls. Wit exists by antipathy ; Humor by sympathy. Wit laughs at things; Humor laughs loith them. Wit lashes external appearances, or cunningly exaggerates single foibles into character ; Humor glides into the heart of its object, looks lovingly on the infirmi- ties it detects, and represents the whole man. Wit is abrupt, darting, scornful, and tosses its analogies in your face ; Humor is slow and shy, insinuating its fun into your heart. Wit is negative, analytical, destructive ; Humor is creative. The couplets of Pope are witty, but Sancho Panza is a humorous creation. Wit, when earnest, has the earnestness of passion, seeking to de- stroy ; Humor has the earnestness of affection, and would ^ft up what is seemingly low into our charity and love. 92 WIT AND HUMOR. Wit, bright, rapid and blasting as the lightning, flashes, strikes and vanishes, in an instant ; Humor, warm and all-embracing as the sunshine, bathes its objects in a genial and abiding light. Wit implies hatred or con- tempt of folly and crime, produces its effects by brisk shocks of surprise, uses the whip of scorpions and the branding-iron, stabs, stings, pinches, tortures, goads, teases, corrodes, undermines ; Humor implies a sure conception of the beautiful, the majestic and the true, by whose light it surveys and shapes their opposites. It is an humane influence, softening with mirth the ragged inequalities of existence, promoting tolerant views of life, bridging over the spaces which separate the lofty from the lowly, the great from the humble. Old Dr. Fuller's remark, that a negro is " the image of God cut in ebony," is humorous ; Horace Smith's inversion of it, that the taskmaster is " the image of the devil cut in ivory," is witty. Wit can coexist with fierce and malignant pas- sions ; but Humor demands good feeling and fellow-feel- ing, feeling not merely for what is above us, but for what is around and beneath us. When Wit and Humor are commingled, the result is a genial sharpness, dealing with its object somewhat as old Izaak Walton dealt with the Irog he used for bait, — running the hook neatly through his mouth and out at his gills, and in so doing WIT AND HUMOR. 93 " using him as though he loved him I " Sydney Smith and Shakspeare's Touchstone are examples. Wit, then, being strictly an assailing and destructive faculty, remorselessly shooting at things from an antag- onist point of view, it not infrequently blends with great passions ; and you ever find it gleaming in the van of all radical and revolutionary movements against estab- lished opinions and institutions. In this practical, exe- cutive form, it is commonly called Satire ; and in this form it has exercised vast influence on human affairs. Its character has varied with the character of individual satirists ; in some taking the beak and talons of the eagle or the hawk, in others putting on the wasp and the dragon-fly. Too often it has but given a brighter and sharper edge to hatred and malignity. In a classifica- tion of satirical compositions, they may be included in two great divisions, namely, satire on human nature, and satire on the perversions and corruptions of human nature. The first and most terrible of these, satire on human nature, dipping its pen in " Scorn's fiery poison," represents man as a bundle of vices and weaknesses, considers his aspirations merely as provocatives of malig- nant scoffing, and debases whatever is most beautiful and majestic in life, by associating it with whatever is vilest and most detestable. This is not satire on men, but on Man. The laughter which it creates is impish 94 WIT AND HUMOR. and devilish, the very mirth of fiends, and its wit the gleam and glare of infernal light. Two great dramatists, Shakspeare and Goethe, have represented this phase of satire artistically, in the characters of lago and Mephis- topheles ; and Dean Swift and Lord Byron have done it personally, in Gulliver and Don Juan ; — Swift, from fol- lowing the instincts of a diseased heart, and the analo- gies of an impure fancy ; Byron, from recklessness and capricious misanthropy. Only, however, in lago and Mephistopheles do we find the perfection of this kind of wit, — keen, nimble, quick-sighted, feelingless, under- mining all virtue and all beauty with foul suspicions and fiendish mockeries. The subtle mind of lago glides to its object with the soft celerity of a panther's tread ; that of Mephistopheles darts with the velocity of a tiger's spring. Both are malignant intelligences, infinitely ingenious in evil, infinitely merciless in purpose ; and wherever their scorching sarcasm falls, it blights and blackens all the humanities of life Now for this indiscriminate jibing and scoffing at hu- man nature there can be no excuse. There is no surer sign of a bad heart than for a writer. to find delight in degrading his species. But still there are legitimate objects for the most terrible and destructive weapons of satire ; and these are the corruptions and crimes of the world, whether embodied in persons or institutions. WIT AND HUMOR. Here wit has achieved great victories, victories for hu- manity and truth. Brazen impudence and guilt have been discrowned and blasted by its bolts. It has over- thrown establishments where selfishness, profligacy and meanness, had hived for ages. It has felt its way in flame along every nerve and artery of social oppressors, whose tough hearts had proved invulnerable to wail and malediction. It has torn aside the masks which have given temporary ascendency to every persecutor calling himself Priest, and every robber calling himself King. It has scourged the bigot and the hypocrite, and held up to "grinning infamy" the knaveries and villanies of corrupt governments. It has made many a pretension of despotism, once unquestioned, a hissing and a by-word all over the earth. Tyrannies, whose iron pressure had nearly crushed out the life of a people, — tyrannies, which have feared neither man nor God, and withstood prayers and curses which might almost have brought doA\Ti Heaven's answering lightnings, — these, in the very bravery of their guilt, in the full halloo of their whole pack of unbridled passions, have been smitten by the shaft of the satirist, and passed from objects of hatred and terror into targets of ridicule and scorn. As men neither fear nor respect what has been made contempti- ble, all honor to him who makes oppression laughable as well as detestable. Armies cannot protect it then ; and 96 WIT AND HUMOR. walls which have remained impenetrable to cannon have fallen before a roar of laughter or a hiss of contempt. Satirists generally appear in the dotage of opinions and institutions, when the state has become an embodied falsehood, and the church a name ; when society has dwindled into a smooth lie, and routine has become religion ; when appearance has taken the place of reality, and wickedness has settled down into wealmess. If we take the great comic writers who represent their age, we shall find that satire, with them, is the expression of their contempt for the dead forms of a once living faith. Faith in Paganism at the time of Homer as contrasted with the time of Aristophanes, — faith in Catholicism in Dante's age as contrasted with the age of Voltaire, — faith in the creations of the imagination at the time of Spenser as contrasted with the age of Pope, — in some degree measure the difference between these writers, and explain why the ridicule of the one should be pitched at what awakened the reverence of the other. Great satir- ists, appearing in the decay of an old order of civiliza- tion, descend on their time as ministers of vengeance, intellectual Alarics, "planetary plagues," " When Jove Shall o'er some high-viced city hang his poisoa In the sick air." They prepare the way for better things by denouncing WIT AND HUMOR. 97 what has become worn, and wasted, and corrupt, — that from the terrible wreck of old falsehoods may spring " truths that wake to perish never." With invincible courage they do their work, and wherever they see accredited hypocrisy or shameless guilt, they wiU speak to it, ** Though Hell itself should gape, And bid them hold their peace." Thus we shall find that many satirists have been radi- cal legislators, and that many jests have become history. The annals of the eighteenth century would be very im- perfect that did not give a large space to Voltaire, who was as much a monarch as Charles the Twelfth or Louis the Fourteenth. Satirical compositions, floating about among a people, have more than once produced revolu- tions. They are sown as dragon's teeth ; they spring up armed men. The author of the ballad of Lilliburlero boasted that he had rhymed King James the Second out of his dominions. England, under Charles II., was governed pretty equally by roues and wit-snappers. A joke hazarded by royal lips on a regal object has some- times plunged kingdoms into war ; for dull monarch s generally make their repartees through the cannon's mouth. The biting jests of Frederick the Great on the Empress Elizabeth and Madame de Pompadour were instrumental in bringing down upon his dominions the 7 98 WIT AND HUMOR. armies of Russia and France. The downfall of the French monarchy was occasioned primarily by its becom- ing contemptible through its vices. No government, whether evil or good, can long exist after it has ceased to excite respect and begun to excite hilarity. Ministers of state have been repeatedly laughed out of office. Where Scorn points its scoffing finger, Servility itself may well be ashamed to fawn. In this connection, I trust no one will consider me capable of making a politi- cal allusion, or to be wanting in respect for the dead, if I refer in illustration to a late administration of our own government, — I mean that which retired on the fourth of March, 1845. Now, during that administration meas- ures of the utmost importance were commenced or con- summated ; the country was more generally prosperous than it had been for years ; there were no spectacles of gentlemen taking passage for France or Texas, with bags of the public gold in their valises ; the executive power was felt in every part of the land ; and yet the whole thing was hailed with a shout of laughter, ringing to the remotest villages of the east and the west. Every- body laughed, and the only difference between its nomi- nal supporters and its adversaries was, that whereas one party laughed outright, the other laughed in their sleeves. Nothing could have saved such an administra- tion from downfiill, for whatever may have been its WIT AND HUMOR. 99 intrinsic merits, it was still considered not so much a government as a gigantic joke. And now, in further illustration of the political impor- tance of satirists, and their appearance in periods of national degradation, allow me to present a few leaves from literary history. The great satirical age of Eng- lish litemture, as you are all aware, dates from the resto- ration of Charles 11. , in 1660, and runs to the reign of George II., a period of about seventy years. During this period floui'ished Dryden, Pope, Swift, Young, Gay, and Arbuthnot, and during this period the national mo- rality was at its lowest ebb. It was an age peculiarly calculated to develop an assailing spirit in men of talent, for there were numberless vices which deserved to be assailed. Authors moved in, or very near, the circle of high life and political life, in the full view of the follies and crimes of both. They were accustomed to see Man in his artificial state, — busy in intrigue, pursuing selfish ends by unscrupulous means, counting virtue and honor as ornamental non-existences, looking on religion as a very good thing for the poor, conceiving of poetry as lying far back in tradition or out somewhere in the coun- try, hiding his hate in a smile, pocketing his infamy with a bow. They saw that the star of the earl, the ermine of the judge, and the surplice of the prelate, instead of representing nobility, justice and piety, were 100 WIT AND HUMOR. often but the mere badge of apostasy, the mere livery of liberticide. They saw that every person seemed to have his price, and that if a man ascertained that he himself was not worth buying, he was perfectly willing to sell his sister or his wife, and strutted about, after the sale, bedizened with infamy, as happy and as pleasant a gen- tleman as one would wish to meet on a summer's day. It was from the depth of such infamy as this last that the Duke of Marlborough emerged, the first general of his time. In such a mass of dissimulation, effrontery, peculation, fraud, — in such a dearth of high thoughts and great passions, — in such a spectacle of moral non- chalance, dignified imbecility, and elegant shamelessness, — the satirical poet could find numberless targets for the scorn-winged arrows of his ridicule ; could sometimes feel that he, too, had his part in the government of the country ; and with honest delight could often exclaim, with Pope, — " I own I 'm proud — I must be proud, to see Men not afraid of God afraid of me." Among these satirists. Pope, of the age of Queen Anne, was Jjy far the most independent, unflinching and merciless. Inferior to Dryden, perhaps, in genius, he was still placed in a position which rendered him more independent of courts and parties, and his invective, unlike that of Dryden, was shot directly at crime and WIT AND HUMOR. 101 folly, without respect to persons. Although he was terribly bitter when galled and goaded by personal oppo- nents, and, in his satire, too often spent his strength against mere imbecility and wretchedness ; yet, take him as he is, the great representative writer of his time ; the uncompromising smiter of powerful guilt, the sturdy defender of humble virtue ; the satirist of dukes, but the eulogist of the Man of Ross ; his works the most perfect specimens of brilliant good sense, his life free from the servility which hitherto had disgraced authorship ; and though charity may find much in him that needs to be forgiven, though justice may even sometimes class him with those moral assassins who wear, like Cloten, their daggers in their mouths, yet still great merit cannot be denied to the poet and the man who scourged hypocrisy and baseness, at a time when baseness paved the way to power, and hypocrisy distributed the spoils of fraud. The courage exercised by such a satirist was by no means insignificant. The enmities which Pope provoked were almost as numerous as knaves and fools. After the publication of the Dunciad, he was generally accom- panied in the street by a huge Irishman, armed with a club, so that if any lean-witted rhymer or fat-fisted mem- ber of Parliament, whom he had gibbeted with his sar- casm, desired to be revenged on his person, the brawny Hioernian had full commission to conduct that contro- 102 WIT AND HUMOR. ^^ersy, according to the most approved logic of the shil- laleh. The other great satirist of the age of Queen Anne was Dean Swift, a "darker and a fiercer spirit" than Pope, and one who has been stigmatized as " the apos- tate politician, the perjured lover, and the ribald priest, — a heart burning with hatred against the whole human race, a mind richly laden with images from the gutter and the lazar-house." Swift has been justly called the greatest of libellers, — a libeller of persons, a libeller of human nature, and, we may add, a libeller of himself. He delighted to drag all the graces and sanctities of life through the pools and puddles of his own mind, and after such a baptism of mud, to hold them up as speci- mens of what dreamers called the inborn beauty of the human soul. He was a bad man, depraved in the very centre of his nature ; but he was still one of the greatest wits, and, after a fashion, one of the greatest humorists, that ever existed. His most effective weapon was irony, a kind of saturnine, sardonic wit, having the self-posses- sion, complexity and continuity of humor, without its geniality ; and, in the case of Swift, steeped rather in the vitriol of human bitterness than the milk of human kindness. Irony is an insult conveyed in the form of a compliment ; insinuating the most galling satire under the phraseology of panegyric ; placing its victim naked WIT AND HUMOR. 103 on a bed of briars and thistles, thinly covered with rose- leaves ; adorning his brow with a crown of gold, which burns into his brain ; teasing, and fretting, and riddling him through and through, with incessant discharges of hot shot from a masked battery ; laying bare the most sensitive and shrinking nerves of his mind, and then blandly touching them with ice, or smilingly pricking them with needles. Wit, in this form, cannot be with- stood, even by the hardest of heart and the emptiest of head. It eats and rusts into its victim. Swift used it with incomparable skill, sometimes against better men than himself, sometimes against the public plunderer and the titled knave, the frauds of quackery and the abuses of government. His morose, mocking and cynical spirit, combined with his sharp insight into practical life, ena- bled him to preserve an inimitable coolness of manner, while he stated the most nonsensical or atrocious para- doxes as if they were self-evident truisms. He generally destroyed his antagonists by ironically twisting their opinions into a form of hideous caricature, and then set- ting forth grave mockeries of argument in their defence ; imputing, by inference, the most diabolical doctrines to his opponents, and then soberly attempting to show that they were the purest offspring of justice and benevolence. Nothing can be more perfect of its kind, nothing more vividly suggests the shallowness of moral and religious 104 WIT AA-D HUMOR. principle which characterized his age, nothing subjects practical infidelity to an ordeal of more tormenting and Avasting ridicule, than his ironical tract, giving a state- ment of reasons why, on the whole, it would be impolitic to abolish the Christian religion in England. This is considered by Mackintosh the finest piece of irony in the English language. Swift's most laughable specimen of " acute nonsense" was his prophecy that a certain quack almanac-maker, by the name of Partridge, would die on a certain day. Partridge, who was but little disposed to die in order to give validity to the prediction of a rival astrologer, came out exultingly denying the truth of the prophecy, after the period fixed for his decease, and not he, had expired. Swift, nothing daunted, retorted in another tract, in which he set forth a large array of quirkish reasons to prove that Partridge was dead, and ingeniously argued tha,t the quack's own testimony to the contrary could not be received, as he was too notorious a liar to be enti- tled to belief on so important a point. But perhaps the most exquisite piece of irony in mod- em literature, and, at the same time, the most terrible satire on the misgovernment of Ireland, is Swift's pam- phlet entitled, " A Modest Proposal to the Public, for Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland from being a Burden to their Country, and for making them WIT AND HUMOR. 105 • Beneficial to the Public j" — which modest proposal con- sisted in advising that the said children be used {or food. He commences with stating that the immense number of children in the arms, or on the backs, or at the heels, of their starving mothers, has become a public grievance, and that he would be a public benefactor who should contrive some method of making them useful to the com- monwealth. After showing that it is impossible to ex pect that they should be able to pick up a livelihood by- stealing much before they are six years old, and saying that he had been assured by merchants that a child under twelve years was no saleable commodity, — that it would not bring on 'change more than three pounds, while its rasfs and nutriments would cost four times that amount, — he proceeds to advise their use as food for their more fortunate fellow-creatures ; and as this food, from its~^delicacy, would be somewhat dear, he considers it all the more proper for landlords, who, as they have already devoured the parents, seem to have the best right to the children. He answers all objections to his proposal by mock arguments, and closes with solemnly protesting his own disinterestedness in making it ; and proves that he has no personal interest in the matter, as he has not himself a child by whom he can expect to get a penny, the youngest being nine years old ! So admirably was the irony sustained, that the pamphlet was quoted by a 106 WTT AND HUMOR. French writer of the time, as evidencing the hopeless barbarity of the English nation. It would be easy to trace the influence of satirical compositions further down the course of English history; but enough has already been said to indicate the check which social and political criminals have received, from the presence of men capable of holding them up to the world's laughter and contempt. This satire, in all free commonwealths, has a share in the legislation and policy of the government ; and bad institutions and pernicious opinions rarely fall, until they have been pierced by its keen-edged mockeries, or smitten by its scathing invec- tives. The lighter follies and infirmities of human nature, as seen in every-day life, have afforded numberless objects for light-hearted or vinegar-hearted raillery, gibe, satire, banter and caricature. Among the foibles of men, Wit plays and glances, a tricksy Ariel of the intellect, full of mirth and mischief, laughing at all, and inspiring all to laugh at each other. Egotism and vanity are promi- nent provocations of this dunce-demolishing fun ; for a man, it has been truly said, is ridiciflous " not so much for what he is, as for pretending to be what he is not." It is very rare to see a frank knave, or a blockhead who knows himself. The life of most men is passed in an attempt to misrepresent themselves, everybody being WIT AND HtjMOR. 107 bitten by an ambition to appear instead of to be. Thus few can visit sublime scener}^ without preparing before- hand the emotions of wonder and awe they ought to feel, and •contriving the raptures mto which they intend to fall. We mourn, make love, console, sentimentalize, in cant phrases. We guard with religious scrupulousness against the temptation of being betrayed into a natural expression of ourselves. A perception of the ludicrous would make us ashamed of this self-exaggerating foible, and save us from the cuffs and pats by which Wit occa- sionally reminds us of it. " Dr. Parr," said a young student once to the old linguist, — "let's you and I write a book." — "Very well," replied the doctor, "put in all that I know, and all that you don't know, and we 'd make a big one." The doctor himself was not free from the conceit he delighted to punish in others ; for satire is apt to be a glass, " in which we see every face but our own." He once said, in a miscellaneous company, " England has produced three great classical scholars ; the first was Bentley, the second was Porson. and the third modesty forbids me to mention." Occa- sionally egotists will strike rather hard against each other, as in the case of the strutting captain of a militia company, who once, in a fit of temporary condescension, invited a ragged negro to drink negus with him. " Oh ! certainly," rejoined the negro ; " I 'm not proud ; I 'd just 108 WIT AIs'D HUMOR. as lieves drink with a militia captain as anybody else." Dr. Johnson was famous for smashing the thin egg-shells of conceit which partly concealed the mental impotence of some of his auditors. One of them once shook Jiis head gravely, and said he could not see the force and application of one of the doctor's remarks. He was crushed instantly by the gruff retort — "It is my busi- ness, sir, to give you arguments, not to give you brains." Sometimes the ridiculousness of a remark springs from the intense superficiality of its conventional conceit, as in the case of the young lady, who, on being once asked what she thought of Niagara, answered, ixiat she never had beheld the falls, but had always heard* them highly spoken of. Ignorance which deems itself pro- foundly wise, is also exquisitely ludicrous. A German prince once gave his subjects a free constitution ; at which they murmured continually, saying that hereto- fore they had paid taxes and been saved the trouble of government, but that now they were not only taxed but had to govern themselves. Wit easily unmasks the hypocrisy and selfishness which underlie loyal and patri- otic catchwords. Parr said that the toast " Church and King" usually meant a "church without a gospel and a king above the law ; " and Sydney Smith, while lashing some tory placemen, ebullient with loyalty, observed that " God save the King" meant too often, " God save my WIT AND HUMOK. 109 pension and my place, God give my sisters an allowance out of the privy-purse, — make me clerk of the irons, let me survey the meltings, let me live upon the fruits of other men's industry, and fatten upon the plunder of the public." Again, all snivelling hypocrisy in speculation, such as that which, when discoursing of the world's evils, de- lights to call Man's sin God's providence, — all boister- ous noodleism in reform, whose champions would take scciety on their knee, as a Yankee takes a stick, and whittle it into shape ; — to these satire gravitates by a natural law. The story told by Horace Smith of the city miss is a good instance of a shock given to affected and mincing elegance. She had read much of pastoral life, and once made a visit into the country for the pur- pose of communing with a real shepherd. She at last discovered one, with the crook in his hand, the dog by his side, and the sheep disposed romantically around him ; but he was without the indispensable musical accompaniment of all poetic shepherds, the pastoral reed. " Ah ! gentle shepherd," softly inquired she, " tell me where 's your pipe." The bumpkin scratched his head, and murmured brokenly, " I left it at home, miss, 'cause I haint got no baccy ! " Wit is infinitely ingenious in what Barrow calls " the quirkish reason," and often pinches hard when it seems 110 WIT AND HUMOR. most seriously urbane. Thus a gentleman once wannly eulogized the constancy of an absent husband in the presence of his loving wife. *' Yes I yes ! " assented she ; " he writes me letters full of the agony of affection, but he never remits me any money." — "I can conceive of that," replied the other, " for I know his love to be unre- mitting." Byron's defence of the selfish member of Par- liament is another pertinent instance : " has no heart, you say, but I deny it ; He has a heart — he gets his speeches by it." Satire is famous for these quiet side cuts and sympa- thetic impertinences. An officer of Louis XIV. was continually pestering him for promotion, and at last drew from him the peevish exclamation — " You are the most troublesome man in my army." — " That, please your majesty, is what your enemies are continually say- ing," was the reply. When George Wither, the Puritan poet, was taken prisoner by the Cavaliers, there was a general disposition displayed to hang him at once ; but Sir John Denham saved his life by saying to Charles 1. — "I hope your majesty will not hang poor George Wither, for as long as he -lives it can't be said that I am the worst poet in England." Sheridan, it is well known, was never free from pecuniary embarrassments. As he was one day hacking his face with a dull razor, he turned to his eldest son, and said, " Tom, if you open WIT AND HUMOR. Ill any more oysters with my razor, I '11 cut you off with a shilling." — "Very well, father," retorted Tom, "but where will the shilling come from ? " Thus into every avenue of lif^ and character Wit darts its porcupine quills, — pinching the pompous, abas- ing the proud, branding the shameless, knocking out the teeth of Pretension. The foibles and crimes of men, indeed, afford perpetual occasions for wit. As soon as the human being becomes a moral agent, as soon as he has put off the vesture of infancy and been fairly depos- ited in trowsers, his life becomes a kind of tragi-comical caricature of himself. Tetchy, capricious, wayward, inconsistent, — his ideas sparks of gunpowder which explode at the first touch of fire, — running the gauntlet of experience, and getting cornered at every step, — making love to a Fanny Squeers, thinking her an Imogen, and finding her a Mrs. Caudle, — buffeting and battling his way through countless disappointments and ludicrous surprises, — it is well for him if his misfortunes of one year can constitute his mirth of the next. One thing is certain, that if he cannot laugh as well as rail — if he cannot grow occasionally jubilant over his own verdancy — if he persists pragmatically in referring his failures to the world's injustice instead of his own folly, — he will end in moroseness and egotism, in cant that snivels and misanthropy that mouths. Even genius and 112 WIT AND HUMOR. u philanthropy are incomplete, without they are accompa- nied by some sense of the ludicrous ; for an extreme sensitiveness to the evil and misery of society becomes a maddening torture if* not modified by a feeling of the humorous, and urges its subjects into morbid exaggera- tions of life's dark side. Thus many who, in our day, leap headlong into benevolent reforms, merely caricature philanthropy. Blinded by one idea, they miss their mark, dash themselves insanely against immovable rocks, and break up the whole stream of their life into mere sputter and foam. A man of genius, intolerant of the world's prose, or incompetent to perceive the humor which underlies it, cannot represent life without distor- tion and exaggeration. Had Shelley possessed humor, nis might have been the third name in English poetry. The everlasting delight we take in Shakspeare and Scott comes from the vivid perception they had of both aspects of life, and their felicitous presentment of them, as they jog against each other in the world. As Wit in its practical executive form usually runs into some of the modifications of satire, so Humor, which includes Wit, generally blends with sympathetic feeling. Humor takes no delight in the mere infliction of pain ; it has no connection with the aggressive or destructive passions. In the creation and delineation of comic char- actel" it is most delightedly employed, and here " Jona- WIT AND HUMOR. 113 than Wild is not too low for it, nor Lord Shaftsbury too high ; " it deals with the nicest refinements of the ludi- crous, and also with what Sterling calls the " trivial and the bombastic, the drivelling, squinting, sprawling clown- eries of nature, with her worn out stage-properties and rag-fair emblazonments." The man of humor, seeing, at one glance, the majestic and the mean, the serious and the laughable ; indeed, interpreting what is little or ridic- ulous by light derived from its opposite idea ; delineates character as he finds it in life, without any impertinent intrusion of his own indignation or approval. He sees deeply into human nature ; lays open the hidden struc- ture and most complex machinery of the mind, and un- derstands not merely the motives which guide actions, but the processes by which they are concealed from the actors. For instance, life is filled with what is called hypocrisy, — with the assignment of false motives to actions. This is a constant source of the laughable in conduct. Wit, judging simply from the act, treats it as a vice, and holds it up to derision or execration ; but Humor commonly considers it as a weakness, deluding none so much as the actor, and in that self-delusion finds food for its mirth. The character of old John Willett, in Barnaby Rudge, so delicious as a piece of humor, would be but a barren butt in the hands of Wit. Wit cannot create character. It might, for instance, cluster innu- 8 114 WIT AND HUMOR. merable satirical associations around the abstract idea of gluttony, but it could not picture to the eye such a per- son as Don Quixote's squire. It cannot create even a purely witty character, such as Thersites, Benedict or Beatrice. In Congreve's plays, the characters are not so much men and women as epigrammatic machines, whose wit, incessant as a shower of fierj- rain, still throws no light into their heads or hearts. Now Humor will have nothing to do with abstractions. It dwells snugly in concrete personal substances, having no toleration either for the unnaturally low or the factitiously sublime. It remorselessly brings down Britannia to John Bull, Cale- donia to Sawney, Hibernia to Paddy, Columbia to Jona- than. It hates all generalities. A benevolent lady, in a work written to carry on a benevolent enterprise, com- mended the project to the humanity, the enlightened liberality, the enlarged Christian feeling, of the British nation. The roguish and twinkling eye of Sydney Smith lighted on this paragraph, and he cried out to her to leave all that, and support her cause with ascertained facts. " The English," said he, with inimitable humor, " are a calm, reflecting nation ; they will give time and money when they are convinced ; but they love dates, names and certificates. In the midst of the most heart- rending narratives. Bull inquires the day of the month, the year of our Lord, the name of the parish, and the WIT AND HUMOR. 115 countersign of three or four respectable householders. After these affecting circumstances have been given, he can no longer hold out ; but gives way to the kindness of his nature, — puffs, blubbers, and subscribes !" There is probably no literature equal to the English in the number and variety of its humorous characters, as we find them in Shakspeare, Jonson, Fletcher, Fielding, Goldsmith, Addison, Scott, and Dickens. There is nothing so well calculated to make us cheerful and char- itable, nothing which sinks so liquidly into the mind, and floods it with such a rich sense of mirth and delight, as these comic creations. How they flash upon our inward world of thought, peopling it with forms and faces whose beautiful facetiousness sheds light and warmth over our whole being ! How their eyes twinkle and wink with the very unction of mirth ! How they roll and tumble about in a sea of delicious Fun, unwea- ried in rogueries, and drolleries, and gamesome absurdi- ties, and wheedling gibes, and loud-ringing extravagant laughter, — revelling and rioting in hilarity, — with countless jests and waggeries running and raining from them in a sun-lit stream of jubilant merriment ! How they flood life with mirth ! How they roll up pomposity and pretence int(f great balls of caricature, and set them sluggishly in motion before our eyes, to tear the laughter f'om our lungs ! How Sir Toby Belch, and Sir Andrew 116 WIT AND HUMOR. Aguecheek, and Ancient Pistol, and Captain Bobadil, and old Tony Weller, tumble into our sympathies ! . What a sneaking kindness we have for Eichard Swivel- ler, and how deeply we speculate on the potential exist- ence of Mrs. Gamp's Mrs. Harris ! How we stow away, in some nook or cranny of our brain, some Master Si- lence, or Starveling the tailor, or Autolychus the rogue, whom it would not be genteel to exhibit to our Reason or Conscience ! How we take some Dogberry, or Verges, or Snug the joiner, tattooed and carbanadoed by the world's wit, and lay him on the soft couch of our esteem ! How we cuff that imp of mischief, Mr. Bailey, as though we loved him ! How Peter Peebles, and Baillie Nicol Jarvie, and Dominie Sampson, and old Andrew Fairser- vice, push themselves into our imaginations, and imper- tinently abide there, whether we will or no ! How Beatrice and Benedict shoot wit at us from their eyes, as the sun darts beams ! There is Touchstone, " swift and sententious," bragging that he has " undone three tailors, had four quarrels, and like to have fought one." There is Sancho Panza, with his shrewd folly and selfish chivalry, — his passion for food an argument against the dogma of the soul's residing in the head, — a pestilent fine knave and unrighteous good fellow, — fbssed about from generation to generation, an object of perpetual merri- ment. " That man," said King Philip, pointing to one WIT AND HUMOR. 117 of his courtiers, rolling on the floor in convulsions of laughter, — " that man must either be mad, or reading Don Quixote." But what shall we say of Falstaff? — filling up the whole sense of mirth, — his fat body " larding the lean earth," as he walks along, — coward, bully, thief, glut- ton, all fused and molten in good humor, — his talk one incessant storm of " fiery and delectable shapes" from his forgetive brain ! There, too, is Mercutio, the perfection of intellectual spirits, the very soul of gayety, — whose wit seems to go on runners, — the threads of his brain light as gossamer and subtle as steel, — his mirthful sallies tingling and glancing and crinkling, like heat- lightning, on all around him ! How his flashing badi- nage plays with Romeo's love-forlornness ! "Romeo is dead ! stabbed, — with a white wench's black eye ! Shot through the ear with a love-song ! The very pin of his heart cleft with the blind bow-boy's butt shaft I " Look, too, at Thersites : — his lithe jests piercing, sharper than Trojan javelins, the brawny Ajax and Agamemnon, and his hard " hits 1 battering their thick skulls worse than Trojan battle-axes ! If ye like not the sardonic Grecian*, then cross from Shakspeare to Scott, and shake hands with that bundle of amiable weaknesses, Baillie Nicol Jarvie. Who can resist the cogent logic by which he defends his free- \ \ 118 WIT AND HU3I0R. booter kinsman, Rob Roy, from the taunts of his brother magistrates? "I tauld them," said he, "that I would vindicate nae man's faults ; but set apart what Rob had done again the law, and the misfortune o' some folk losing life by him, and he was an honester man than stude on any o' their shanks ! " Look ye now, for one moment, at the deep and deli- cate humor of Goldsmith. How at his touch the venial infirmities and simple vanity of the good Vicar of Wake- field live lovingly before the mind's eye ! How we sympathize with poor Moses in that deep trade of his for the green spectacles ! How all our good wishes for aspiring rusticity thrill for the showman, who would let his bear dance only to the genteelest tunes ! There, too, is Fielding. Who can forget the disputes of Square and Thwackem ; the raging, galvanized imbecility of old Squire Western ; the good, simple Parson Adams, who thought schoolmasters the greatest of men, and himself the greatest of schoolmasters ! But why proceed in an enumeration of characters whose name is Legion — who spring up, at the slightest call, like Rhoderick Dhu's men, from every bush and brake of memory, and come thronging and crowding into the brain ! There they are, nature's own capricious offspring — with the unfading rose in their puffed cheeks, with the unfailing glee in their twinkling eyes : WIT AND HUMOR. 119 " Age cannot wither, nor custom stale Their infinite variety ! " If " time and the hour" would admit, it would not be out of place to refer to Wit as an auxiliary power in contests of the intellect; to its influence in detecting sophisms which elude serious reasoning, such as the sub- stitution, so common among the prejudiced and the igno- rant, of false causes for striking effects. In Mirth, too, are 'often expressed thoughts of the utmost seriousness, feelings of the greatest depth. Many men are too sensi- tive to give voice to their most profound or enthusiastic emotions, except through the language of caricature, or the grotesque forms of drollery. Tom Hood is an in- stance. We often meet men whose jests convey truths plucked from the bitterest personal experience, and whose very laughter tells of the " secret wounds which bleed beneath their cloaks." Whenever you find Humor, you find Pathos close by its side. Every student of English theological literature knows that much of its best portions gleams with wit. Five of the greatest humorists that ever made the , world ring with laughter were priests, — Rabelais, Scarron, Swift, Sterne, and Sydney Smith. The prose works of Milton are radiant with satire of the sharpest kind. Sydney Smith, one of the most benevolent, intelligent and influential Englishmen of the nineteenth century, 120 WIT AND HUMOR. a man of the most accurate insight and extensive information, embodied the large stores of his practical wisdom in almost every form of the ludicrous. Many of the most important reforms in England are directly traceable to him. He really laughed his countrymen out of some of their most cherished stupidities of legislation. And now let us be just to Mirth. Let us be thankful that we have in Wit a power before which the pride of wealth and the insolence of office are abased ; which can transfix bigotry and tyranny with arrows of light- ning ; which can strike its object over thousands of miles of space, across thousands of years of time ; and which, through its sway over an universal weakness of man, is an everlasting instrument to make the bad tremble and the foolish wince. Let us be grateful for the social and humanizing influences of Mirth. Amid the sorrow, dis- appointment, agony and anguish of the world, — over dark thoughts and tempestuous passions, the gloomy ex- aggerations of self-will, the enfeebling illusions of melan- choly, — Wit and Humor, light and lightning, shed their soft radiance, or dart their electric flash. See how life is warmed and illumined by Mirth ! See how the being? of the mind, with which it has peopled our imaginat^' wrestle with the ills of existence, — feeling theii into-the harshest or saddest meditations, with looks thai defy calamity ; relaxing muscles made rigid with pain ; WIT AND HUMOR. 121 hovering o'er the couch of sickness, with sunshine and laughter in their beneficent faces ; softening the austerity of thoughts whose awful shadows dim and darken the brain, — loosening the gripe of Misery as it tugs at the heart-strings ! Let us court the society of these game- some, and genial, and sportive, and sparkling beings, whom Genius has left to us as a priceless bequest ; push them not from the daily walks of the world's life ; let them scatter some humanities in the sullen marts of busi- ness ; let them glide in through the open doors of the heart; let their glee lighten up the feast, and gladden the fireside of home : — *' That the night may be filled with music, And the cares that infest the day May fold their tents, like the Arabs, And as silently steal away." LECTURE IV.* THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. In a lecture on Wit and Humor, which I had the honor of delivering before this society last winter, I attempted an analysis of those qualities, — exhibited the influence of Wit as a political weapon, and alluded to Humor as a creator of comic character. This evening, I desire to ask your attention to another department of the same exhaust- less subject, — The Ludicrous Side of Life; that is, those aspects of crime, misery, folly and weakness, under which they appear laughable as well as lamentable. The sub- ject is so philosophical in its nature, presents so many of the more remote and elusive points of character for analysis, and demands so rigorous a classification of social facts, that the audience must pardon me if the amuse- ment suggested by the title of the lecture is not borne out by a corresponding pleasantry in its treatment. . The ludicrous in life arises from the imperfection of * Delivered before the Boston Mercantile Library Association, October, 1846. THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 123 human nature, from that perpetual contradiction betA-een our acts and aspirations which makes our ideas everlast- ing satires on our deeds and institutions. If we consider only the elements of human nature, we can easily con- ceive them so harmoniously combined as to constitute perfection of character ; but the moment we pass from thoughts to facts, we are amazed at the monstrous per- versions and misdirections of these elements. Instead of a reciprocal action of coordinate powders, we find what appears to be a mad jumble of conflicting opinions and impulses. We see the seemingly self-centred being, who goes under the name of Man, whirled continually from his beckoning ideals by a thousand seductive external impressions ; changing from " half dust, half deity," into all dust and no deity ; and running the dark round of weakness and wickedness, from the besotted stupidity of the idiot, to the grinning malignity of the fiend. We turn, heart-sick and brain-sick, to the past, only to find the same moral chaos, — a confused mass of folly and crime, dignified now with the title of expediency, now with that of glory, — Caligulas and Neros, Caesars and Napoleons, James Stuarts and Frederick Williams, each experiment- ing on the most efRcacious way of ruining nations, each playing off a gigantic game of theft or murder before an admiring or reverential world. Vice on the throne, vir- tue on the gibbet, — there you have the two prominent 124 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. figures in the grand historical picture painted on the wide canvass of time. Now, unless there were in the human mind certain powers, by which all this wickedness and wretchedness could be gazed at from a different point of view than that of passion or conscience, there can be no doubt that thought and observation would drive ever}'' good man into insanity. We know this from the manner in which excitable spirits all around us rave and fret at the world's evil, even now. We may not say how thin is often the partition which separates the caucus and reform meeting from the strait-jacket and the maniac's cell; and in how many hearts, on fire with an indignant hatred of oppression and hj'pocrisy, there bums the impatient impulse of the blind giant of old, to pull down the pillars of the social edifice, if by so doing they might crush the Philistines feasting within its walls. But the human mind cannot long live on stilts, and nature therefore has provided two powers by which the asperities of sensibility may be softened, — Imagination and Mirth : Imagination cunningly substituting its own ideals for facts, and smoothly cheering the mind with beautiful illusions; Mirth looking facts right in the face, detecting their ludi- crous side, and turning them into objects of genial glee or scornful laughter. By a perception of human faults and follies under the conditions of Humor, we lose our THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 125 indignant disgust, and regain our humanity; and by seeing crime with the eye of Wit, we find that it is as essentially mean, little and ridiculous, as it is hateful. The serpent, it is true, still retains its form ; but its head is no longer raised, its eyes no longer glitter, its fangs no longer dart poison, but it crawls fearfuUy away to its foul hiding-place, the trample and spurn of every contemptu- ous heel — and then it becomes our turn to hiss ! Whatj indeed, can be more pitiably ridiculous than the spectacle of a man, endowed at the best or worst with but a small portion of a demon's venom or a demon's power, setting himself up against God and the nature of things ! — an insignificant insect in the path of the lightning, sagely bullying the bolt ! Thus the crimes and infirmities of human nature, as manifested in the million diversities of character and peculiarities of action and position, can be made the sub- jects of merriment as well as moralizing. Change the point of view, and the things which made us shriek will make us laugh. From Lucifer to Jerry Sneak, there is not an aspect of evil, imperfection and littleness, which can elude the light of Humor or the lightning of Wit. It would be impossible, in one or twenty lectures, to show the unnumbered varieties of Mirth, from which these crimes and infirmities may be viewed. I shall confine myself, therefore, to the two extremes of Humor and Wit, l26 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. the jovial and the bitter ; and I cannot better illustrate them than by a consideration of the two great exponents of these extremes, Rabelais and Shakspeare's Thersites. Between these lie unnumbered varieties of mirth. Ra- belais is all fun at human weakness ; Thersites, all gall at human depravity. And first, let us look at Rabelais, the wisest, shrewdest, coarsest, most fertile, most reckless, 'of all humorists. Both his life and works were steeped in fun to the very lips. Fun seemed the condition of his being ; his genius, learning, passions, hopes, faith, all in- stinctively fashioned themselves into some of the various oddities of mirth. Hermes shook hands with Momus at his nativity. The period in which he lived, the first half of the sixteenth century, was one of amazing licentious- ness ; and he has portrayed it with a vulgarity as amazing. The relicfion of that ao^e seemed to consist in the worshin of two deities from the heathen heaven. Mars and Bac- chus, and two devils from the Christian pandemonium, Moloch and Belial. Its enormities were calculated to pro- voke a shudder rather than a smile. Yet to Rabelais, the dark intrigues of poisoners and slabbers calling them- selves statesmen, and the desolating wars waged by sceptred highwaymen cfdling themselves kings, appeared exquisitely ridiculous. All the actor:? in that infernal farce, all who led up the giddy death-dance of the tyrants and bacchanals, only drew from him roar upon roar of THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 127 elephantine laughter. His humor rushes from him like an inundation, unfixing the solidest pyramids of human pride, whelming everything away in a flood of ridicule. All that was externally dignified in the church and state of Europe, — kings, queens, nobles, cardinals, — he tum- bles about like so many mischievous children, and makes them indulge in the most insane freaks of elvish caprice. But here we must distinguish between the resistless mirth of Rabelais, which is compatible with essential humanity, and the monstrous glee of some base and detestable tyrants, who have jested with human blood, and found a demoniacal delight in laughing over deeds which have consigned them to the execration of posterity. Such was Nero, who saw in the burning of Rome, set on fire by himself, only an occasion for exercising his musi- cal talents. Such was Barrere, that miracle of cruelty and baseness, who, amid all the horrors of the French Revolution, never descended into the weakness of pity, but performed the worst atrocities of oppression and mur- der with a fiendish glee. Thus, to please an infamous companion, he obtained the passage of a law denouncing the wearing of a certain head-dress as a capital crime ag^ainst the state. He never told the story, says his biographer, without going into convulsions of laughter, which made his hearers hope he would choke ; and Macaulay adds, that there must have been something 128 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. peculiarly tickling and exhilarating, to a mind like his, " in this grotesque combination of the frivolous and the horrible, — false hair and curling-irons with spouting arteries and reeking hatchets." Such laughter as this might indeed make " Hell's burning rafters Unwillingly reecho laughters." But such was not the mirth of Rabelais. He could not have laughed ivith Nero and Barrere ; he could not have helped laughing at them. From the stories told of Rabelais, he must have been in life the same strange, wise, sharp, and mirthful imp, which he appears in his writings. He seems even to have looked death in the face with a grin on his own. As his friends were weeping round his bed, he exclaimed, — " Ah ! if I were to die ten times over. I should never make you cry half so much as I have made you laugh." Being pressed by some ravenous relations, who thought him rich, to sign a will leaving them large legacies, he at last complied, and on being asked where the money could be found, he answered, " As for that, you must do like the spaniel, look about and search." As he was dying, a page entered from the Cardinal du Bellay, to inquire after his health. The old humorist muttered in reply, — "Tell my lord in what circumstance you found me ; I am just going to leap into the dark. He is up in THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 129 the cock-loft ; bid him stay where he is. As for thee, thou 'It always be a fool. Let down the curtain ; the farce is done." Immediately after his death, his relations seized upon a sealed paper, purporting to be his last will and testament, which, on being opened, was found to contain three pithy articles : "I owe much ; I have noth- ing : I leave the rest to the poor." Many eminent and some virtuous men have left the world with jests on their lips. Augustus Caesar appealed to the friends round his dying bed, if he had not very well acted the farce of life. Sir Thomas More joked on the scaffold. The wit of Lord Dorset, in his last hours, surprised even Congreve, the wittiest of English comic dramatists. But Rabelais, in life and death, was the most consistent of all the tribe of Democritus. His deepest and subtlest meditations, his most earnest loves and hatreds, were sportively expressed; and when he came to " leap into the dark," it was a jest that lit the way. It would be easy to moralize out the rest of the hour ori such a mirthful mons'lrosity as this ; but that is not my business here. There the old wag stands in literary history — a monument of mirth, with his large, unctuous brain, his rosy and roguish face, his fat free-and-easiness ; a mad jest lurking in every line of his lawless lips, a wild glee leaping in every glance of his laughing eyes ! There is but one Rabelais. 9 130 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. Now Thersites, in Shakspeare's "icilus and Cres- sida, is a man of an entirely different make. He repre- sents the class of wits who hate and deride crime from no love of virtue, and belittle greatness merely to glut their waspish spleen. But he is perfect in his way. He talks a whole armory of swords and stilettos. His words hurtle through the air like fire-tipped arrows. They seem almost to hit the reader, — so keen are they, and sent with such unerring aim. He is the thorniest of all wits. His bitter brilliancy bites into the very core of things. The great-limbed Homeric heroes. Achilles, Ajax, Agamemnon, look small enough in his stabbing sentences. His railing is more executive than their smiting arms ; and he tosses them up and do\vn, riddling them with his satire, almost impaling them with his edged scorn. " Hector," he says to Ajax and Achilles, " Hector will have a great catch if he knocks out either of your ♦>rains ; 'a were as good crack a fusty nut with no kernel." And then how his sharp malice exults over these examples of " valiant ignorance," these " sodden- witted lords, that wear their tongues in their arms I " His description of Ajax ruminating is perfect. " He bites his lip with a politic regard, as who should say — There were wit in this head an 't would out : and so there is ; but it lies as coldly in him as fire in a flint, which will not show without knocking." Again, he calls him THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 131 the " idol of idiot worshippers," " a full dish of fool," " a mongrel cur;" and the richly dressed Patroclus he addresses as — " Thou idle immaterial skein of sleive silk, thou green sarcenet flap for a sore eye, thou tassel of a prodigal's purse, thou ! Ah ! how the poor world is pestered with such water-flies, diminutives of nature ! " So fares it with " that same dog-fox, Ulysses, and that stale old mouse-eaten dry cheese, Nestor." Every one who wishes to know the height and depth of railing should give his days and nights to Thersites. He accu- mulates round the objects of his hatred all images of scorn and contumely ; and he hates everj'^body, not excluding himself. Everything in him has turned to spleen ; everything that comes from -him is dipped in his gall. His criticism of the persons and events of the Trojan war, as they pass before his view, takes the heroic element clean out of them. It is wonderfully edifying to hear him discourse of Paris and Helen. With one stroke of his tongue heroes descend into beef-witted bullies, goddesses dwindle down into silly girls. He buzzes over the Grecian camp like a hornet, and seizes every favora- ble moment to dart down and sting. No matter how much he is beaten by the brawny fist of his master Ajax — his tongue revenges every blow in a hail-storm of scurrilous words. You can hear them patter on the helmets of the Greeks, like a shower of Trojan stones. 132 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. Thersites is an everlasting proof of the resistless power of the tongue. He lashes both armies with a whip of words, and leaves his jests sticking in their flesh like so many thorns and thistles. The fine audacity of Shaks- peare's world-wide genius could hardly have been more splendidly displayed than thus in placing the bitterest of human satirists side by side with the most poetical of human heroes. In looking at the laughable side of life, it might be dangerous to depict it a la Rabelais or a la Thersites. But between these extremes are numberless varieties ; and it is from some half-way station, perhaps, that we may obtain the best view. We have already seen that It is from the inharmoniousness and consequent perver- sion of the human mind that the ludicrous in human life has its source, and in proportion to the vividness with which we perceiva^he original laws and principles thus perverted, will be the clearness of our insight into the ridiculousness of the perversions. Now everything morbid, diseased and one-sided, everything out of its due relations, all excess in the development of any one faculty or opinion, go to make up the vast mass of life's bombast and bathos. The slightest glance at society reveals the most contemptible shams strutting under borrowed names. Nothing in itself good but is transformed by the cunning alchemy of selfishness into some portentous evil or pitiful THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 133 deception, transparent to the eye of Mirth, but full of sacredness to the eye of Wonder. There is a great difference, says Coleridge, " between an egg and an egg- shell; but at a distance they look remarkably alike." Now, to question these deceptions, to pierce these bubbles with shafts that disclose their emptiness, generally raises the most discordant cackling among the world's geese. Miss Pigeon is so charmed with the attentions of Captain Rook, that she grows amazingly indignant at the voice which forbids the banns. Appearances have so long been confounded with realities, that an attack on the one is too commonly taken as evidence of enmity to the other; and, like the charmed bullet of the hunter, strikes the shepherd, though directed at the wolf. Everybody knows that fanaticism is religion caricatured ; bears, indeed, about the same relation to it that a monkey bears to a man ; yet, with many, contempt of fanaticism is received as a sure sign of hostility to religion. Thus things go moaning up and down for their lost words, and words are perpetu- ally engaged in dodging things ; and it becomes exceed- ingly dangerous for a prudent man to discriminate between a truth and its distortion — between prudence and avarice, acuteness and cunning, sentiment and sen- timentality, sanctity and sanctimoniousness, justice and "Revised Statutes," the dignity of human nature and 134 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. the Hon. Mr. ; yet it is just in this discrimina- tion that the ludicrous side of life is revealed. And now let lis glance at this heaving sea of human life, with its pride, its vanity, its hypocrisy, its selfishness, its match-making, its scandal-mongering, its substitution of the plausible for the true, the respectable for the good, and pick out a few of its leading falsehoods for comment. The first quality that strikes us here is human pride, with its long trains of hypocrisy and selfishness. " This comes of walking on the earth," said the Spanish hidalgo of Quevedo, when he fell upon the ground. Alas! that Tom Moore's bitter pleasantry on the peacock politician should apply to so large a portion of mankind : — " The best speculation that the market holds forth, To any enlightened lover of pelf, Is to buy up at the price he is worth, And sell him at that he puts on himself." Now this pride, this self-exaggeration, the parent of all spiritual sins, tracing its long lineage up to Lucifer him- self, is as ridiculous as it is malignant. From our well- bred horror of the Satanic, the devil to us is a sublimely wicked object ; but I can conceive of Rabelais as rushing into convulsions of laughter at the folly of Satan, — at the mere idea of imperfect evil waging its weak war against omnipotent Good ! What a lesson, indeed, is all history, and all life, THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 135 to the folly and fmitlessness of pride ! The Egyp- tian kings had their embalmed bodies preserved in massive pyramids, to obtain an earthly immortality. In the seventeenth century they were sold as quack medicines, and now they are burnt for fuel ! " The Egyptian mummies, which Cambyses or Time hath spared, avarice now consumeth. Mummy is become merchandise. Mizraim cures wounds, and Pharaoh is sold for balsams." Pride and vanity have raised those iron walls of separation between men, that division of humanity into classes and ranks, which neither benevo- lence nor religion can leap. The artificial distinctions of society, the parents of numberless fooleries of bigotry and prejudice, will probably afford matter of everlasting moralizing to the preacher, and everlasting merriment to the wit. " I considered him," said a witness in Thur- tell's trial, " I considered him a very respectable man." " What do you mean by respectable ? " — " Why, he kept a gig ! " Kank, birth, wealth, saith the worldling, thou shalt have no other gods but these. Genius and virtue are good only when they are genteel. The brother of Beethoven was of this creed. He signed his name, to distinguish himself from his landless brother, " Von Beethoven, Land-owner." The immortal composer retorted by signing his, " Ludwig Von Beethoven, Brain- owner." We often hear in society the magical death- 136 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. warrant pronounced — " He does not belong to our class — she does not belong to our set,'' — as if those words cast out the condemned into another species, — as if the class or set included all in the world we are bound to esteem, all whose rights we are bound to respect. The huntsman, in Joseph Andrews, calls off his hounds from chasing the poor parson, because they would be injured by following vermin ! The ludicrous bigotries, the stu- pendous stupidities, which this isolation from the race engenders, are often perfectly amazing instances of human folly. " When a country squire," says Sydney Smith, " hears of an ape, his first impulse is to give it nuts and apples ; when he hears of a dissenter, his immediate impulse is to commit it to the county jail, to shave its head, to alter its customary food, and to have it privately whipped." In Christian England the feeling of caste is nearly as potent as in heathen India. The nobleman hardly realizes that he belongs to the same original spe- cies, and has part in the same original sin, as the miner and cotton-spinner; — though nothing would seem to be more evident than that " From yon blue heaven above us bent, The gardener Adam and his wife Smile at the claims of long descent." But we need not cross the Atlantic to discover these division lines between the vulgar little and the vulgar THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 137 great. The weakness of the American people is the absurd importance they attach to gentilfty. To gain this, they sacrifice heahh, strength, comfort, and often honor. As a man here, however, must have power 'as well as caste, his life oscillates between two ambitions ; the ambition to be popular, and the ambition to be gen- teel. He accordingly puts his " universal brotherhood " into sermons, his patriotism into Fourth of July orations, and his life and soul into " our set." It is curious to see the agency of this gentility in formalizing even love and hatred. " What will Mrs. Grundy say ? " — this pertinent interrogation has sorcery enough to robe malice in smiles, and freeze affection into haughtiness. As there can be no happiness in marriage without station and style, the old worship of Cupid, the god, is transferred to cupidity, the demon ; the test question, not what a person is, but what a person has ; and the motive, not so much love as an establishment. This has become so common that it is no longer called sin, but prudence. The fact is so glaring that it has even found its way into the weak heads of sentimental novelists^ The last result of all this foolery is that kind of intellectual death going under the name of fashionable life ; the declaration that man is not a mysterious compound of body and soul, but of coat and pantaloons ; and the final triumph of dandy nature over human nature. " Nature," says the coxcomb in Colman's 13S THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. comedy, to the blooming country girl, " Nature is very clever, for she made you ; but nature never could have made me ! " • The two pillars which support this edifice of human pride are impudence and hypocrisy, or shameless preten- sion and canting pretension. " Words," said a cunning old politician, a few days before his withdrawal from the palace to the tomb, " words were given to conceal, not to express, thought." Of how large a portion of mankind may it be said, that they do not so much live as pretend ? Raise the cry of any reform, and crowds of sharpers and dunces rush to pick pockets and talk nonsense under its broad banners, and the satirist stands by to declare, with South, how much of this liberty of conscience means liberty /7*077i conscience, or, with Colton, how much of this freedom of thought means freedom frovi thought. Con- servatism is a very good thing ; but how many conserva- tives announce principles which might have shocked Dick Turpin, or nonsensicalities flat enough to have raised contempt in Jerry Sneak ! " A conservative," says Douglas Jerrold, " is a man who will not look at the new moon, out of respect for that ' ancient institution,' the old one." Radicalism or reform is another very good thing ; but, quaintly says old Doctor Fuller, " many hope that the tree will be felled, who hope to gather chips by the fall." When Johnson asserted patriotism to be the last THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 139 s refuge of the scoundrel^ he said something not more than half true. Would we could aver that he said something more than half wrong. Philanthropy is another very good thing, perhaps the best of all good things ; but much of it which we see is of a cheap kind ; a compounding of " sms we are inclined to," by condemning those " we nave no mind to ;" an elegant recreation of conscience, calling for no self-sacrifice, and admitting the union of noble sentiments with ignoble acts. The English mer- chant professes to be horror-struck at the atrocities of southern slavery ; the ^aveholder curses England for her starvation policy to labor; the Yankee is liberal of rebukes to both. Now this inexpensive moral indignation may produce good results ; but shall we throw up our caps in admiration of the philanthropy of either ? No ! for on the broad and beautiful brow of true philanthropy is written self-denial, self -sacn^ce. It says, the system which enriches me harms another, and therefore I repu- diate it, therefore I will do all in my power to put it down. This conscious hypocrisy it is very easy to understand ; but there is, in a large number of minds, an unconscious hypocrisy, which presents an almost insoluble problem to the investigator. In some cases it is self-deceit, resulting from weakness or ignorance. In others, it indicates the passage of the hypocrite from being false into falsehood 140 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. itself; the quack believing in hii own impostures, — the hypocrisy, once on the surface, eating into the very soul of the man, and lying him at last into an organic lie. These two aspects of character can be perceived, but not analyzed. They baffle the metaphysician, only to shine more resplendently on the page of the humorist. What a Leibnitz or Butler could but imperfectly convey, looks out upon us in living forms from the picture-gallery of Cervantes and Shakspeare, of Addison and Steele, of Goldsmith and Dickens. Without recurring to these, instances can be readily adduced from every-day life. Benevolence and malignity often coexist in retailers of scandal ; persons, who can be fitly described only in the verbal paradoxes launched by Timon* at his "smiling, smooth, detested" parasites, — "courteous destroyers, affable wolves, meek bears." Tears are copiously show- ered over frailties the discoverer takes a malicious delight in circulating ; and thus, all granite on one side of the heart, and all milk on the other, the unsexed scandal- monger hies from house to house, pouring balm from its weeping eyes on the wounds it inflicts with its Stabbing tongue. Again, — you all know, that, a short time since, when a fear was expressed that the Bible would be banished from the public schools, how much horror and indignation thereat emitted itself in the lustiest profane swearing. But perhaps the finest instance of this uncon- THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 14 scious hypocrisy is the fact related of the simple southern clergyman. He owned half of a negro slave ; and in his prayers, therefore, he prayed that the Lord would preserve his house, his land, his family, and his half of Pomp. It would be impossible to note a thousandth part of the hypocrisies, conscious or unconscious, woven into the very texture of every-day life, and having their source in the desire of men to appear better than they are. Popu- lar as are the realities of avarice, malice, falsehood and chicane, nothing is more unpopular than their appear- ances. License, therefore, must talk the language of freedom ; knavery must stalk on the stilts of philan- thropy i public plunder and national degradation must wear the guise of glory and patriotism. Some have almost reached the perfection of South's ideal hypocrite, " who never opens his mouth in earnest, but when he eats or breathes." Everywhere, cant; nowhere, a plain avowal of folly or selfishness. Oliver Cromwell cannot butcher a couple of poor Irish garrisons, without doing it for the glory of God ; the Hon. Mr. cannot argue in favor of perpetual slavery, without doing it for the good of the slave. O ! never talk of rewarding virtue, for virtue never can be paid in the world's sugar-plums ; but if life cannot be carried on without roguery, would it not be well to place a bounty on courageous, uncanting rascality, and, passing by a heap of tongue-virtuous 142 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. hypocrites, select that man for office who dares to acknowledge himself a rogue ! Among the countless deceptions passed off on our sham-ridden race, let me direct your attention to the deception of dignity, as it is one which includes many others. Among those terms which have long ceased to have any vital meaning, the word dignity deserves a dis- graceful prominence. No wofa has fallen so readily as this into the designs of cant, imposture and pretence ; none has played so well the part of verbal scarecrow, to frighten children of all ages and both sexes. It is at once the thinnest and most effective of all the coverino-s D under which duncedom sneaks and skulks. Most of the men of dignity, who awe or bore their more genial brethren, are simply men possessing the art of passing off their insensibility for wisdom, their dulness for depth ; and of concealing imbecility of intellect under haughti- ness of manner. Their success in this small game is one of the stereotyped satires on mankind. Once strip from these pretenders their stolen garments, once disconnect their show of dignity from their real meanness, and they would stand shivering and defenceless, objects of the tears of pity, or targets for the arrows of scorn. But it is the misfortune of this world's affairs, that offices, fitly occu- pied only by talent and genius, which despise pretence, should be filled by respectable stupidity and dignified THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 143 emptiness, to whom pretence is the very soul of life. INIanner triumphs over matter ; and throughout society, politics, letters and science, we are doomed to meet a swarm of dunces and windbags, disguised as gentlemen, statesmen and scholars. Coleridge once saw, at a dinner table, a dignified man with a face wise as the moon's. The awful charm of his manner was not broken until the muffins appeared, and then the imp of gluttony forced from him the exclamation, — "Them's the jockeys for me ! " A good number of such dignitarians remain undiscovered. It is curious to note how these pompous gentlemen rule in society and government. How often do history and the newspapers exhibit to us the spectacle of a heavy-headed stupiditarian in official station, veiling the sheerest incompetency in a mysterious sublimity of car- riage, solemnly trifling away the interests of the state, the dupe of his own obstinate ignorance, and engaged, year after year, in ruining a people after the most digni- fied fashion ! You have all seen that inscrutable dispen- sation known by the name of the dignified gentleman : an embodied tediousness, which society is apt not only to tolerate but worship ; a person who announces the stale commonplaces of conversation with the awful pre- cision of one bringing dow^n to the valleys of thought .^"ight truths plucked on its summits ; who is so pro- 144 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. foundly deep and painfully solid on the weather, the last novel, or some other nothing of the day ; who is inex- pressibly shocked if your eternal gratitude does not repay him for the trite information he consumed your hour in imparting ; and who, if you insinuate that his calm, con- tented, imperturbable stupidity is preying upon your patience, instantly stands upon his dignity, and puts on a face. Yet this man, with just enough knowledge " to raise himself from the insignificance of a dunce to the dignity of a bore," is still in high favor even with those whose animation he checks and chills, — why? Because he has, all say, so much of the dignity of a gentleman ! The poor, bright, good-natured man, who has done all in his power to be agreeable, joins in the cry of praise, and feelingly regrets that nature has not adorned him, too, with dulness as a robe, so that he likewise might freeze the volatile into respect, and be held up as a model spoon for all dunces to imitate. This dignity, which so many view with reverential despair, must have twinned, " two at a birth," with that ursine vanity mentioned by Cole- ridge, " which keeps itself alive by sucking the paws of its own self-importance." The Duke of Somerset was one of these dignified gentlemen. His second wife was the most beautiful woman in England. She once sud- denly threw her arms round his neck, and gave him a kiss which might have gladdened the heart of an empe- THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 145 ror. The duke, lifting his heavy head awfully up, and giving his shoulders an aristocratic square, Mowly said, " Madam, my first wife was a Howard, and she never would have taken such a liberty." This absurd importance attached to dignity is a fertile source of bombast in life. It not only exalts the bad or brainless into high position, but it is apt to convert emi- nent men into embodied hyperboles ; for, to fulfil the popular requisitions of greatness, you will sometimes see statesmen descend into this poor deception, and, though giants in action or speculation, condescend to become charlatans in manner. Lord Chatham and Napoleon were as much actors as Garrick or Talma. Now, an imposing air should always be taken as evidence of imposition. Dignity is often a veil between us and the real truth of things. Wit pierces this veil with its glit- tering shafts, and lets in the " insolent light." Humor carelessly lifts the curtain, swaggers jauntily into the place itself, salutes the amazed wire-pullers with a know- ing nod, and ends with slapping Dignity on the back, with a " How are ye, my old boy ?" In truth, the factitious elevation we give to some per- sons comes from identifying the actual and the idea!, — the imagination cunningly suppressing minor faults, exaggerating certain qualities into colossal size, and call- ing those qualities by the name of men. The characters 10 146 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. of distinguished personages are generally drav'i\ in this way. It is the vice of most biographies, and gives a wooden and unnatural aspect to most characters in his- tory. The difference between the truth and deception, in this regard, is the difference between a character drawn by Racine and a character drawn by Shakspeare or Scott. This factitious dignity cannot stand a moment the test of ri-dicule. One of the most externally awful and imposing persons in the world is the Speaker of the House of Commons. There once happened to be a dead silence in the house, when its members were all present. This was broken by a startling hiccough in the gal- lery, and the voice of a drunken reporter putting the stunning interrogative, " Mr. Speaker, will you favor us with a song ? " The dainty portions of literature are ever liable to overturn from the shocks of prose. Not only has life its ludicrous side, but its serious side has its ludicrous point. Poetiy itself is often an exquisitely ironical comment upon actual life, but few seem to take the joke. The original of Goethe's Werther, whose "sorrows" have become immortal, was a dull fellow, with nothing in his face indicative of sentiment or intelligence. A person who visited him remarked, that nobody would know he had any brains, if the poet had not informed us he had blown them out. Halleck's notion of Wyoming. THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 147 drawn from observation, is different from Campbell's, drawn from fancy. The Gertrude of Halleck is found "hoeing corn." Pastoral life can hardly be found in pastures. All heroism, even, which depends on external costume or form, is ever in danger of being killed by little actualities. "The Iliad," says Sydney Smith, " would never have come down to these times if Aga- memnon had given Achilles a box on the ear. We should have trembled for the jEneid if some Trojan nobleman had kicked the pious iEneas in the Fourth Book. JEneas may have deserved it ; but he could not have founded the Roman empire after so distressing an accident." And we have all seen how an Americaji general, singed and scarred with the fire of desperately contested battles, came near being extinguished at last, from a slightly increased alacrity in the disposition of his soup. From this confounding of substance with form, this universal tendency to individual exaggeration and bom- bast, this stilted way of carrying on life, it has become customary to identify mirth with frivolity. Without insisting upon the depth and wisdom of the great Wits and Humorists of the world, it is evident that the best arguments are often condensed into epigrams, and that good jokes are often comprehensive axioms. The narrowness of utihtarianism was never made so evident as in the remark, that " we do not estimate the 148 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. value of the sun by the amount it saves us in gas." Cariyle's whole theory of government is contained in a quibble, — that nations are not governed by the able man, but the man able to get appointed. Superstitions, exploded by knowledge, often exist as puns. Thus some of the ancients, who believed the soul to be made of fire, considered death by drowning to be remediless — water putting the soul out. An epigram often flashes light into regions where reason shines but dimly. Holmes disposed of the bigot at once, when he compared his mind to the pupil of the eye, — " the more light you let into it, the more it contracts." Nothing better exhibits the horrors of capricious despotism than the humorous statement of the King of Candia's habits : " If his tea is not sweet enough, he impales his footman ; and smites oflT the head of half a dozen noblemen, if he has a pain in his own." In this connection, also, it is not inappro- priate to refer to the importance of a vivid perception of the ludicrous as a weapon of self-defence. That habit of instantaneous analysis which we call readiness has saved thousands from contempt or mortification. The dexterous leap of thought, by which the mind escapes from a seemingly hopeless dilemma, is worth all the vestments of dignity which the world holds. It was this readiness in repartee which continually saved Vol- taire from social overturn. He once praised another THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 149 writer very heartily to a third person. "It is very strange," was the reply, " that you speak so well of him, for he says that you are a charlatan." — "0!" replied Voltaire, " I think it very likely that both of us may be mistaken." Again, you must all have heard the anecdote of the young gentleman who was discoursing very dog- matically about the appropriate sphere of woman. "And pray, sir," screamed out an old lady, " what is the appro- priate sphere of woman?" — "A celestial sphere, mad- am ! " Robert Hall did not lose his power of retort even in madness. A hypocritical condoler with his misfor- tunes once visited him in the mad-house, and said, in a whining tone, "What brought you here, Mr. Hall?" Hall significantly touched his brow with his finger, and replied, "What '11 never bring you, sir — too much brain ! " A rapid change from enthusiasm to nonchalance is often necessary in society. Thus a person once elo- quently eulogizing the angelic qualities of Joan of Arc, was suddenly met by the petulant question, — what was Joan of Arc made of? " She was Maid of Orleans." A Yankee is never upset by the astonishing. He walks among the Alps with his hands in his pockets, and the smoke of his cigar is seen among the mists of Niagara. One of this class sauntered into the office of the light- ning telegmph, and asked how long it would take to transmit a message to Washington. "Ten minutes," 150 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. was the reply. " I can't wait," was his rejoinder. Sher- idan never was without a reason, never failed to extricate himself in any emergency by his wit. At a country house, where he was once on a visit, an elderly maiden lady desired to be his companion in a walk. He excused himself at first on the ground of the badness of the weather. She soon afterwards, however, intercepted him in an attempt to escape without her. " Well," she said, "it has cleared up, I see." — "Why yes," he an- swered, " it has cleared up enough for mw^ but not enough for ^z^o." It was this readiness which made John Ran- dolph so terrible in retort. He was the Thersites of Congress, — a tongue-stabber. No hyperbole of con- tempt or scorn could be launched against him, but he could overtop it with something more scornful and con- temptuous. Opposition only maddened him mto more brilliant bitterness. " Is n't it a shame, Mr. President," said he one day in the senate, " that the noble bull-dogs of the administration should be wasting their precious time in worrying the rats of the opposition." Immedi- ately the senate was in an uproar, and he was clamor- ously called to order. The presiding officer, however, sustained him ; and, pointing his long, skinny finger at his opponents, Randolph screamed out, " Rats, did I say ? — mice^ mice ! " The ludicrous side of life, like the serious side, has its THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 151 literature, and it is a literature of untold wealth. Mirth is a Proteus, changing its shape and manner with the thousand diversities of individual character, from the most superficial gayety to the deepest, most earnest humor. Thus the wit of the airy, feather-brained Far- quhar glances and gleams like heat lightning ; that of Milton blasts and burns like the bolt. Let us glance carelessly over this wide field of comic writers, who have drawn new forms of mirthful being from life's ludicrous side, and note, here and there, a wit or humorist. There is the humor of Goethe, like his own summer morning, mirthfully clear ; and there is the tough and knotty humor of old Ben Jonson, at times ground down at the edge to a sharp cutting scorn, and occasionally hissing out stinging words, which seem, like his own Mercury's, " steeped in the very brine of conceit, and sparkle like salt in fire." There is the incessant brilliancy of Sheri- dan, — " Whose humor, as gay as the fire-fly's light, Played round every subject, and shone as it played ; Whose wit, in the connbat as gentle as bright, Ne'er carried a heart-stain away on its blade." There is the uncouth mirth, that winds, stutters, wrig- gles and screams, dark, scornful and savage, among the dislocated joints of Carlyle's spavined sentences. There is the lithe, springy sarcasm, the hilarious badinage, the 152 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. brilliant careless disdain, which sparkle and scorch alon^ the glistening page of Holmes. There is the sleepy smile that sometimes lies so benignly on the sweet and serious diction of old Izaak Walton. There is the mirth of Dickens, twinkling now in some ironical insinuation, — and anon winking at you with pleasant maliciousness, its distended cheeks fat with suppressed glee, — and then, again, coming out in broad gushes of humor, overflowing all banks and bounds of conventional decorum. There is Sydney Smith, — sly, sleek, swift, subtle, — a mo- ment's motion, and the human mouse is in his paw ! Mark, in contrast with him, the beautiful heedlessness with which the Ariel-like spirit of Gay pours itself out in benevolent mockeries of human folly. There, in a corner, look at that petulant little man, his features working with thought and pain, his lips wrinkled with a sardonic smile ; and, see ! the immortal personality has received its last point and polish in that toihng brain, and, in a straight, luminous line, with a twang like Scorn's own arrow, hisses through the air the unerring shaft of Pope, — to " Dash the proud gamester from his gilded car," And, "Bare the base heart that lurks beneath a star." There, a little above Pope, see Dry den, keenly dissecting THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. 153 the inconsistencies of Buckingham's volatile mind, or leisurely crushing out the insect life of Shadvvell, — " Owned, without dispute, Throughout the realms of Nonsense absolute." There, moving gracefully through that carpeted parlor, mark that dapper, diminutive Irish gentleman. The moment you look at him, your eyes are dazzled with the whizzing rockets and hissing wheels, streaking the air with a million sparks, from the pyrotechnic brain of Anacreon Moore. Again, cast your eyes from that blind- ing glare and glitter, to the soft and beautiful brilliancy, the winning grace, the bland banter, the gliding wit, the diffusive humor, which make you in love with all man- kind in the charming pages of Washington Irving. And now, for another change, — glance at the jerks and jets of satire, the mirthful audacities, the fretting and teasing mockeries, of that fat, sharp imp, half Mephistopheles, half Falstaff, that cross between Beelzebub and Rabelais, known, in all lands, as the matchless Mr. Punch. No English statesman, however great his power, no English nobleman, however high his rank, but knows that every week he may be pointed at by the scofhng finger of that omnipotent buffoon, and consigned to the ridicule of tlie world. The pride of intellect, the pride of wealth, the power to oppress — nothing can save the dunce or crim- inal from being pounced upon by Punch, and held up to 154 THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE. a derision or execration, which shall ring from London to St. Petersburg, from the Ganges to the Oregon. From the vitriol pleasantries of this arch-fiend of Momus, let us turn to the benevolent mirth of Addison and Steele, whose glory it was to redeem polite literature from moral depravity, by showing that wit could chime merrily in with the voice of virtue, and who smoothly laughed away many a vice of the national character, by that humor which tenderly touches the sensitive point with an evan- escent grace and genial glee. And here let us not forget Goldsmith, whose delicious mirth is of that rare quality which lies too deep for laughter, — which melts softly into the mind, suffusing it with inexpressible delight, and sending the soul dancing joyously into the eyes, to utter its merriment in liquid glances, passing all the expression of tone. And here, though we cannot do him justice, let us remember the name of Nathaniel Hawthorne, deserving a place second to none in that band of humor- ists whose beautiful depth of cheerful feeling is the very poetry of mirth. In ease, grace, delicate sharpness of satire, — in a felicity of touch which often surpasses the felicity of Addison, in a subtlety of insight which often reaches further than the subtlety of Steele, — the himior of Hawthorne presents traits so fine as to be almost too excellent for popularity, as, to every one who has at- tempted their criticism, they are too refined for state- THE LUDICROUS SIDE OF LIFE 155 merit. The brilliant atoms flit, hover, and glance before our minds, but the remote sources of their ethereal light lie beyond our analysis, — " And no speea of ours avails To hunt upon their shiniug trails." And now let us breathe a benison to these, our mirthful benefactors, these fine revellers among human weak- nesses, these stern, keen satirists of human depravity. "Wherever Humor smiles away the fretting thoughts of care, or supplies that antidote which cleanses " The stuffed bosom of that perilous stuff Which weighs upon the heart," — wherever Wit riddles folly, abases pride, or stings iniqui- ty, — there glides the cheerful spirit, or glitters the flash- ing thought, of these bright enemies of stupidity and gloom. Thanks to them, hearty thanks, for teaching us that the ludicrous side of life is its wicked side no less than its foolish ; that, in a lying world, there is still no mercy for falsehood ; that Guilt, however high it may lift its brazen front, is never beyond the lightnings of Scorn ; and that the lesson they teach agrees with the lesson taught by all experience, — that life in harmony with reason is the only life safe from laughter, that life in harmony with virtue is the only life safe from' con- tempt. Library^ LECTURE V/ GENIUS. There is one law inwoven into the constitution of things, which declares that force of mind and character must rule the world. This truth glares out upon us from daily life, from history, from science, art, letters, from all the agencies which influence conduct and opinion. ' The whole existing order of things is one vast monument to the supremacy of mind. The exte- rior appearance of human life is but the material em- bodiment, the substantial expression, of thought, — the hieroglyphic writing of the soul. The fixed facts of society, laws, institutions, positive knowledge, were once ideas in a projector's brain — thoughts which have been forced into facts. The scouted hypothesis of the fifteenth century is the time-honored institution of the nineteenth ; the heresy of yesterday is the commonplace of to-day. We perceive, in every stage of this great movement, a certain vital force, a spiritual power, to which we give * Delivered before the Boston Mercantile Library Association, February, 1848. GENIUS. 157 the name of Genius. From the period when our present civilized races ran wild and naked in the woods, ^and dined and supped on each other, to the present time, the generality of mankind have been contented with things as they were. A small number have conceived of some- thing better, or something new. From these come the motion and ferment of life ; to them we owe it that exist- ence is not a bog but a stream. These are men of genius. There are, therefore, two fields for human thought and action, the actual and the possible, the realized and the real. In the actual, the tangible, the real- ized, the vast proportion of mankind abide. The great region of the possible, whence all discovery, invention, creation, proceed, and which is to the actual as a universe to a planet, is the chosen region of Genius. As almost everything which is now actual was once only possible, as our present facts and axioms were originally inventions or discoveries, it is, under God, to Genius that we owe our present blessings. In the past, it created the present; in the present, it is creating the future. It builds habitations for us, but its own place is on the van- ishing points of human intelligence, — * " A motion toiling in the gloom, The spirit of the years to come, Fearning to mix itself with life." The sphere and the influence of Genius it is easier to 158 GENIUS. ascertain than to define its nature. What is Genius ? It has been often defined, but each definition has included but a portion of its phenomena. According to Dr. John- son, it is general force of mind accidentally directed to a particular pursuit ; but this does not cover the compre- hensive genius of Shakspeare, Leibnitz and Goethe; and, besides, accident, circumstance, do not determine the direction of narrower minds, but simply furnish the occasion on which an inward tendency is manifested. The most popular definition is that of Coleridge, who calls genius the power of carrying the feelings of child- hood into the powers of manhood. Such a power may indicate the genius of Coleridge and Wordsworth, but did Napoleon conquer at Austerlitz, Newton discover the law of gravitation, Shakspeare create Macbeth, by carry- ing the feelings of childhood into the powers of man- hood ? This mode of defining by individual instances is like drawing a map of Massachusetts, and calling it the globe — a thing we are very apt to do. Indeed, Genius has commonly been incompletely de- fined, because each definition has been but a description of some order of genius. A true definition would be a generalization, made up from many minds, and broad enough to include all the results of genius in action and thought. Genius is not a single power, but a combina- tion of great powers. It reasons, but it is not reasoning GENIUS. 159 it judges, but it is not judgment ; it imagines, but it is not imagination ; it feels deeply and fiercely, but it is not passion. It is neither, because it is all. It is another name for tlie perfection of human nature, for Genius is not a fact but an ideal. It is nothing less than the possession of all the powers and impulses of humanity, in their greatest possible strength and most harmonious combination; and the genius of any particular man is great in proportion as he approaches this ideal of univer- sal genius. Conceive of a mind in which the powers of Napoleon and Howard, Dante and Newton, Luther and Shakspeare, Kant and Fulton, were so combined as to act in perfect harmony ; a mind, vital in every part, con- ceiving everything with intensity and yet conceiving everything under its due relations, as swift in its volitions as in its thoughts, — conceive of a mind like this, and you will have a definition of genius. As it is, it requires the energies of all men of genius to produce the results of genius. It exists somewhat in fragments. No one human mind comprehends all its elements. The nearest approach to universality of genius in intellect is Shaks- peare ; in will, Napoleon ; in harmony of combination, Washington. It is sing-ular that Washington is not generally classed among men of genius. Lord Brougham declares him to be the greatest man that ever lived, but of moderate talents, — as if being the soul of a revolution 160 GENIUS. and the creator of a country, did not suppose energies equal to those employed in the creation of a poem, — as if there were any other certain test of genius but its influence, any other measure of the power of a cause but the maofnitude of its effects ! But to return. Genius, in its highest meaning, being thus an Ideal, which the most powerful natures have but approached, which, while it comprehends all men of genius, is itself comprehended by none, the question still arises, what common quality distinguishes men of genius from other men, in practical life, in science, in letters, in every department of human thought and action ? This common quality is vital energy of mind, — inherent, original force of thought and vitality of conception ; a quality equally distinguishing the genius of action and meditation, making the mind in which it abides alive, and capable of communicating intellectual and moral life to others. Men in whom this energy glows seem to spurn the limitations of matter; to dive beneath the forms and appearances to the spirit of things ; to leap the gulf which sepamtes positive knowledge from discovery, the actual from the possible ; and, in their grasp of spir- itual realities, in their intense life, they seem to demon- strate the immortality of the soul that bums within them. They give palpable evidence of infinite capacity, of indefinite power of growth. It seems a mockciy to GENIUS. 161 limit their life by years, — to suppose that fiery essence can ever bum out or be extinguished. This life, this energy, this uprising, aspiring flame of thought, — " This mind, this spirit, this Promethean spark, This lightning of their being," — has been variously called power of combination, inven- tion, creation, insight ; but in the last analysis it is resolved into vital energy of soul, to think and to do. This quality of genius is sometimes difficult to be distinguished from talent, because high genius includes talent. It is talent and something more. The usual distinction between genius and talent is, that one repre- sents creative thought, the other practical skill ; one invents, the other applies. But the truth is, that high genius applies its own inventions better than talent alone can do. . A man who has mastered the higher mathe- matics does not on that account lose his knowledge of arithmetic. Hannibal, Napoleon, Shakspeare, Newton, Scott, Burke, Arkwright, — were they not men of talent as well as men of genius ? Because a great man does not always do what many smaller men can often do as well, smaller men must not, therefore, affect to pity him as a visionary, and pretend to lick into shape his form- less theories. But still there doubtless is a marked distinction be- tween men of genius and men simply of talent. Talent 11 162 GENIUS. repeats ; Genius creates. Talent is a cistern ; Genius, a fountain. Talent deals with the actual, with discovered and realized truths, analyzing, arranging, combining, applying positive knowledge, and in action looking to precedents. Genius deals with the possible, creates new combinations, discovers new laws, and acts from an insight into principles. Talent jogs to conclusions to which Genius takes giant leaps. Talent accumulates knowledge, and has it packed up in the memory ; Genius assimilates it with its own substance, grows with every new accession, and converts knowledge into pmver. Talent gives out what it has taken in ; Genius, what has risen from its unsounded wells of living thought. Talent, in difficult situations, strives to untie knots, which Genius instantly cuts, with one swift decision. Talent is full of thoughts ; Genius, of thought : one has definite acquisi- tions ; the other, indefinite power. But the most important distinction between the two qualities is this : — one, in conception, follows mechanical processes ; the other, vital. Talent feebly conceives ob- jects with the senses and understanding ; Genius, fusing all its powers together in the alembic of an impassioned imagination, clutches everything in the concrete, con- ceives objects as living •Realities, gives body to spiritual abstractions and spirit to bodily appearances, and, like GENIUS. 16.*^ " A gate of steel Fronting the sun, receives and renders back His figure and his heat ! " It is thus the glorious prerogative of Genius to conceive and to present everj'-thing as alive; and here is the secret > of its power. It leads and sways because it communi- \cates living energy, and strikes directly at the soul, — searching out the very sources of our volitions, bowing our weak wills before its strong arm, awakening, animat- ing, forcing us along its path of thought, or over its waves of passion. \ It commands us because it knows better than we what is within us. Soul itself, it knows that, in spite of our contemptible disguises, we too have souls which must leap up at its voice, and follow whithersoever it leads. It claims its rightful mastery over our spirits, by awakening us to a sense of our spiritual existence. It speaks to us, in our captivity, in the long-forgotten language of our native land. It sees us wrapped up in the dead cerements of custom, rusting away in the sep- ulchre of being, and it cries to us, — " Come forth ! " It speaks to us, and w^e hear; it touches us, and we spring to our feet. A crowd of spirits from the realms of the deathless come thronging around us ; — from the battle- held, where Liberty went down under the brutal hoofs of Power, its immortal image trampled in the dust, — f"om the legislative hall, where, amid the collision of 164 GENIUS. adverse intellects, the orator poured his torrent of fire, — from the rack and the stake, where the spirit of man chanted rapturous hymns in its fierce agonies, and met death smiling, — from the cell of the thinker, where mind grappled with the mysterious unknown, piercing, with its thought of light, the dark veil of unrealized knowledge and possible combinations ; — from every scene where the soul has been really alive, and impa- tiently tossed aside the material conditions which would stifle or limit its energies, come the Genii of Thought and Action, to rouse us from our sleep of death, to tear aside the thin delusions of our conceit, and to pour into the shrunken veins of our discrowned spirits the fresh tides of mental life. It is this influence of Genius which has given motion and progress to society ; prevented the ossification of the human heart and brain ; and though, in its processes, it may not ever have followed the rules laid down in primers, it has at least saved history from being the region of geolog}', and our present society from being a collection of fossil remains. Thus, of the three requisitions of Genius, the first is soul, and the second, soul, and the third, soul. We have already seen that almost all genius is particular, witli an inborn direction to particular pursuits. The tendency of its vital force is generally perceived in childhood. I can devote but little space to the youth of genius, though GENIUS. J65 the subject is tempting, and furnishes numberless anec- dotes of the earnestness, the intensity, with which the great mind early abandons itself to its irrepressible im- pulses. Carnot, who, as one of the Committee of Public Safety during the French Revolution, directed the opera- tions of fourteen armies, and hurled back the tide of invasion which came rolling in over the Alps, the Pyre- nees and the Rhine, was taken, when a child, to the theatre, where some siege was clumsily represented. Seeing that the attacking party were so placed as to be commanded by a battery, he astonished the audience by demanding that the general should change his position, and cried out to him that his men were in fire. — The young genius early exults' in the contemplation of power and beauty. During Scott's childhood, a frightful thun- der-storm raged at Edinburgh, which made his brothers and the domestics huddle together in one room, shiver- ing with fear at every peal. Young Walter 'was found lying on his back in the garden, the rain pitilessly pelt- ing his face, while he, almost convulsed with delight, shouted at every flash, " bonnie ! bonnie ! " Schiller was found by his father, on a similar occasion, perched upon a tree ; and on being harshly questioned as to his object, whimpered out that he wanted to see where the thunder came from. Byron's first verses, when a child of four or five years, displayed the same perverseness 166 GE>;ius. and unbridled vehemence which afterwards flamed out in Manfred and Cain. An old lady near his house, who entertained the belief that on her death her soul would reside in the moon, bothered him considerably in his childish pranks. He revenged himself in four lines : — " In Nottingham County there lives, at Swan Green, As curst an old lady as ever was seen ; And when she does die, which I hope will be soon^ She firmly believes she will go to the moon." It would be needless to multiply instances, familiar to ever}'body, that the man's genius is born with him. Legislator, reformer, soldier, poet, artist, thinker, — the child is still " the father of the man." In some instances, it must be admitted, the whole man does not grow. Na- poleon's youth prefigured his maturity, and something else. The sovereign who crushed the heart of his queen in his mailed hand, was once a man of sentiment. When quite young, he fell in love with a young maiden ; they contrived little meetings ; and he afterwards averred that their whole happiness then consisted in eating cher- ries together. We have seen that genius is vital energy of soul. In itself it supposes a harmonious combination of will, intel- lect and sensibility ; but, as manifested in men of genius, this combination is not perfect. Hence the division of powerful natures into men of action and men of medita- GENIUS. 167 tion; men in whom will predominates, and men in whom thought predominates. In the one case, the vital energy of the mind takes a practical direction, works visibly on society, and produces events. In the other, it takes the direction of meditation, influences society by methods more strictly spiritual, and produces poetrj^ science, the fine arts, everything that stimulates and gratifies the inward sense of truth, beauty, and power. And first let us refer to the genius of action, to genius whose thoughts are read in deeds. Men of action may be classed in three divisions : — those who exercise their energies for what they deem the truth ; those who exer- cise them for personal interest and ambition ; and those in whom selfish and disinterested motives are strangely blended. The greatness of action includes immoral as well as moral greatness, — Cortes and Napoleon, as well as Luther and Washington. Its highest exemplification is where energy of will carries out a great original thought to a practical result, with uprightness of moral intention ;(and perhaps the noblest example of this is in ColmTibus.<^ Its lowest exemplification is where great en- ergies of will are divorced from conscience and human- ity ; and perhaps the lowest example of this is in Pizarro. But neither by the side of Columbus nor Pizarro can we place the moral trimmer, without any definite purpose, whose heart is continually aching for the crimes of the 168 GENIUS. "" bad, but whose will is too infirm to battle bravely for the good. Such a person may shine among well meaning people, but his claims to greatness of any kind are ridic- ulous. Pizarro was a buccaneer, but he had, at least, an object, which was to him dearer than life, and to compass it he displayed the valor of a knight and the endurance of a martyr. How strangely does his conduct at the island of Gallo contrast with the tongue-valiant cowardice which characterizes the feebly good ! After suffering all that fatigue, famine and pestilence could inflict, short of death, a vessel arrived which offered to carry him and his companions back to Panama. To go was to abandon forever the project of conquering and plundering Peru. Pizarro drew his sword, and traced a line on the sand with it from east to west. Then turning to the south, he said to his band of immortal pirates : — " Friends and comrades ! on that side are toil, hunger, nakedness, the drenching storm, desertion and death ; on this side, ease and pleasure. There lies Peru with its riches ; here, Panama with its poverty. Choose, each man, what best becomes a brave Castilian. For my part, I go to the south." Now, as long as bad men display qualities like these, so long will they rule ; for to qualities like these is given the dominion of the world. Such men, to be checked, are not to be talked about, but to be wrestled with, — to be bravely met by superior force of will, and GENIUS. 169 overthrown. Never will this be done by the moral bab- ble of men who wish to serve God, and wish, at the same time, to live comfortably all tlieir days. Well has the great Christian poet of the age affirmed, — " The law By which mankind now suffers is most just. For, by superior energies, more strict Affiance in each other, faith more firm In their unhallowed principles, the bad Have fairly earned a victory o'er the weak, The vacillating, inconsistent good." The great characteristic of men of active genius is a suUime self-confidence, springing, not from self-conceit, but from an intense identification of the man with his object, wliich lifts him altogether above the fear of dan- ger and death, which gives to his enterprise a character of insanity to the common eye, and which communicates an almost superhuman audacity to his will. Men of this stamp seem to have a clear and bright vision of what is hidden from other men, and to push instinctively forward, through every obstacle, to its attainment. They seem to hear voices crying to them from the mysterious unknown, and to answer the call in flashes of supernatural energy. They ever give the impression of spirits, to whom mate- rial obstacles are as flax in the fire. Judge from their words and their deeds, and you would suppose their 170 GENIUS. bodies partook, like Milton's angels, of incorporeal sub- stance, which, if pierced or cloven, would instantly re- unite. They have no fear of death, because their souls are thoroughly alive ; and the idea of death never occurs to a live mind. In following the career of one of these fierce and flashing intelligences, our astonishment finds vent in some such words as the heroism of Duke Sopho- cles forced from Fletcher's honest centurion : " By Romulus, he is all soul, I think ; lie hath no flesh, and spirit cannot be g^^ved." Such men, also, dart their souls into vast bodies of men, become the animating spirit of great enterprises, and communicate vitality even to those whose submission they enforce. Every soldier in the army of Caesar and Napoleon, felt the soul of Ccesar or Napoleon glowing within his own breast. While obeying another will, new life seemed poured into his own. Audacity and a beau- tiful contempt of death breathe and burn in the words and deeds of such commanders. " My lads," said Napo- leon to some raw recruits, " you must not fear death ; when soldiers brave death, they drive him into the enemy's ranks." The great Conde, when twice repulsed with frightful slaughter at Fribourg, led his soldiers up in person to the mouths of the enemy's cannon, and hurled his marshal's baton over the intrenohments. Nothing could resist the impetuosity of French soldiers, GENIUS. 17J after such a spur had been given to their energies. " Follow my plume ! " said Henry the Fourth to his knights; — "you will always find it on the road to vic- tory." " Hang thyself, brave Crillon," said he, in the same spirit of chivalry ; "we have fought a't Arques, and thou wast not there." Speak thus to the higher senti- ments of men on great occasions, and you will find their souls will instinctively iiiount up to their native region. When the Spanish Armada threatened England, the Queen of England spoke to her troops in words warm from her own lion heart. She did not tell them that an invasion would prejudice their interests, or even their liberties, but she luondered that Parma and proud Spain should dare to invade her dominions. The success of Luther was in a great degree owing to his indomitable will, — a will which forced its way through obstacles which might have daunted armies, and gave to his char- acter that moral intensity, which fitted him to be the leader in what Guizot calls, " the great insurrection of human thought against authority." When advised not to go to a city, notoriously thronged with his enemies, he said, " Were there as many devils there as roof-tiles, I would on ! " This is the feeling of the great reformer everywhere ; — to make life a battle for the truth ; to strike heavier blows for the Right than others can for the Wrong ; in one word, to dare ! This principle has been 172 GENIUS. repeatedly caricatured by those who have pretended to represent it. It was vilely caricatured in that infernal farce, the French Revolution, in which audacity and mediocrity formed a hideous union. But it is no less the virtue of genius because it is the vice of folly. There is a great difference between the dogmatism of knowledge and the dogmatism of ignorance. Kepler might say, that if God had waited five thousand years before he had raised up a man capable of comprehending His wonderful works, he could wait a thousand for men to comprehend his discoveries ; but such language as this is impotent trash, worthy only to be received with a storm of hisses, when uttered by pretentious mediocrity. This energy and audacity of will characterizes all rul- ing public men, — statesmen, generals, reformers, orators. In the great orator, especially, it is seen in the condensa- tion, the burning vehemence, the brief, stern strokes, with which he pierces through the reason and through the passions of his audience, directly at their volitions, — spurning, trampling, upon all opposing wills, hurrying the souls whom he has taken captive onward, ever onward, to the insatiable object which impatiently beckons in the distance ! Demosthenes, the greatest of orators, is the great master of this intense and rapid movement. He never repeats ; never, says Brougham, comes back upon the ground, " which he has once utterly wasted and GENIUS. 173 withered up by the tide of fire he has rolled over it." It was this intense will, this force of being, which chiefly distinguished the arrogant and ruling genius of Chatham. He cowed those whom he could neither convince nor persuade. A country member of Parliament once rose to accuse him of a palpable inconsistency in his conduct. He had hardly mumbled a few words before he was looked down into his seat by the steady scorn which blazed upon him from Chatham's eye. It was this fofce which gave such audacity to his bursts of blended opinion and passioq — as in that well-known exclamation in the House of Lords, — " They tell me that America has resisted. I am rejoiced to hear it ! " " Sugar, my lords," said he, on another occasion, in his deep, grave voice. A well-bred sneer instantly smiled on the lips of his noble auditors, at the disparity between the term and the tone. Chatham saw it, kindled at the insult, and repeated sugar three times, in his fiercest tones and with his most violent gesticulations, until he awed them into putting on civil faces. He then asked, derisively, " Who will laugh at sugar now ? " We sometimes see this power exercised in private life, and controversies settled by force of will, instead of force of argument. Dr. John- son wielded it with admirable energy. The records of Robert Hall's conversation boil over with an audacity of expression, which cuts clean through the " linen deceri- 174 GENIUS. cies" of polite life. " Mr. Hall," said one of his parish- ioners, " I understand you are going to marry Miss ." — " I marry Miss ! I would as soon marry Beelzebub's eldest daughter, and go home and live with the old folks." Again, speaking of Dr. Ryland, he exclaimed, " Why, sir, Dr. Ryland 's all piety ; all piety together, sir. If there were not room in heaven, God WQuld turn out an archangel for him." His proposal to his housekeeper had a similar wildness. " Betty, do you love the Lord Jesus ? " — " Yes, sir." — " And Betty, do you love me ? " — " Yes, sir." They were married at once. Perhaps the most wonderful example of this audacity in a mind at once vast and flexible, intense and compre- hensive, is in Csesar, — a man to whose commanding genius empire seemed but another term for action. Compared with him, Alexander seems but a hot-headed boy, and even Napoleon " pales his uneffectual fire." The amazing strength of his mind is not so remarkable as its plastic character — the ease with which it accom- modated itself to every emergency — its wonderful fusion of will, intelligence and passion. It never hardened in any part, and all its powers were thus capable of instan- taneous concentration. Though his determinations were as sure as they were swift, we still never speak of his iron will, feeling that such a term would not express its ethereal strength, and its felicity of adaptation to every GENIUS. 175 occasion. The acts of Cassar affect us like unexpected tlashes of imagination in a great poem. At the age of seventeen, in flying from the power of Sylla, he fell into the clutches of pirates. They fixed his ransom at twenty talents. "It is too little," he said; "you shall have fifty; but once free, I will crucify everj" one of you;" and he did it. When his favorite legion mutinied, he abandoned them before they could abandon him, and they followed him like spaniels, suing for forgiveness. In Spain, his legions would obey neither his entreaties nor commands to attack the vast army opposed to them. But they knew not the resources of their commander. Seizing a shield, he cried, " I will die here ! " and rushed singly upon the Spanish ranks. Two hundred arrows flew against him, when within ten paces of the enemy, — and his soldiers could not but charge in his support. At Rome, when he heard of plots to assassinate him, he proudly dismissed his guards, and ever afterwards walked through the streets alone and unarmed. Well might his "honorable murderers" have wondered, as that withered frame lay before them, pierced with twenty stabs, that a body so worn and weak could have contained so vast and vehement a soul. In all history we have no other instance of a mind of such ethereal make, divorced from moral principle. The Romans thought him a god, and to all posterity he will be the great, bad man of the world. 176 GENIUS. Interpenetrate the will of Luther, the benevolence of Howard, the religion of Fenelon, with the mind of Goethe, and you would have a man as resistless for duty as Csesar was for glory. But, you may say, this military courage is not spiritual, but physical. Let us hear the testimony of one qualified to speak to this point, — of one who was both warrior and writer, — the testimony of the great tragic poet of Greece. How run the lines written by himself to serve for his own epitaph ? "Athenian ^schylus, Eurphorian's son, Buried in Geta's fields, these words declare ; His deeds are registered at Marathon, Known to tne deep- haired Mede who met him there." Have we not here the same stern, fiery, invulnerable sold, which clothed in verse of such imperishable grand- eur the awful agonies of the chained Prometheus ? But to return : Brutus has been placed above Caesar in greatness by those who write books for children. Now, Brutus had no genius ; was simply a proiid, inflexible, hard-minded and narrow-minded patrician, whose notion of liberty was below that of Russia's autocrat, and whose notion of virtue was worse than his notion of liberty. " Virtue," said he, just before his death, — "vain word, futile shadow, slave of chance! Alas ! I believed in thee ! " — Here a heroical soul ! Here a great moral genius ! Why, Caesar would not have said GENIUS. 177 such a thing even of vice ! No man who had vitally con- ceived virtue, as a living reality, — ever identified him- self with it, — could thus have mocked its awful immor- tality with his peevish atheism. He called virtue a word, because to him it was a barren proposition about virtue, to which his understanding assented, — not a liv- ing realization q/" virtue, which his whole nature adored. How mean does such a man appear by the side of such a woman as Joan of Arc, the saint of France ! How much more force dwelt in the little peasant maiden than in Rome's proud patrician ! She, in the might and the simplicity of her nature, identified herself with duty, and, armed in her intelligence and faith, was, in her sphere, as resistless as Caesar, — because her mind was as vital. From the time her soul first caught th§ sound of the cathedral bells, chiming above her cottage home, to the period when she fell into the gripe of the grim English wolves, her life was one expression of holiness, purity and action. Viewed in connection with the Satanic passions of that dark period, she seems to de- scend upon her age as a heavenly visitant, with celestial beauty and celestial strength. France has no nobler boast than her heroic genius ; England no fouler stain than her brutal murder. She is among the greatest of the great of action. It is almost needless to say that in English history she appears variously as witch, wanton, 178 GENIUS. sorceress and fanatic, — not as the wisest, purest, ablest intelligence of her time. We have seen, so far, that vital energy of soul is the great characteristic of the genius of action. It is not less so of the genius of meditation. We call the one force of character ; the other, force of mind : but vital thought is at heart of both. True depth and strength of character is in proportion to the living spiritual prin- ciple within the men. Force, power, dominion, are traced in letters of fire on the brow of the thinker, as on the crown of the actor. From both come those kindling, quickening influences, which move the world. But to the thinker, the range of the man of action is all too nar- row to satisfy the creative energy of his intellect. The reformer, the soldier, the patriot, each commonly over- estimates the importance of his special object, from not vitally conceiving its relations as well as itself*. Shaks- peare cannot do the work of Luther, because he is on an eminence where Luther's work falls into its right relations to other possible reforms, which Luther feebly conceives or fiercely underestimates. To Luther it is the thing to be done ; to Shakspeare, only one thing to be done. Shakspeare, again, would not expend his ener- gies for the objects of Napoleon, because he sees further and deeper than Napoleon into their nature. Yet we are not from this to conclude that the force exercised in GENIUS. 179 the region whence events indirectly spring, is not as great as that exercised in the region whence events directly spring. Influence is the measure of power ; and he must be a dealer in hardy assertions who shall say that the influence on manldnd of men of action has been greater than men of thought. In truth, action is influ- ential, as meditation is influential, just in proportion to the vital thought it embodies and represents. It may be as well here to mention a common preju- dice against genius, that it is a quality of idle, lazy men ; of clever vagabonds, who have a knack of seizing some things by intuition which others obtain by logic ; of men. who spontaneously perceive what others laboriously inves- tigate. If a child flouts at parental authority, abhors study, investigates the condition of hen-roosts, and prac- tically illustrates new views of property, his sloth, trickery and thieving, are apt to be laid to his genms. All mis- erable pretenders, poetasters, quacks, ranters, — disciples of disorder everywhere, — are considered to be fools and vagabonds in virtue of their genius. The general feeling is well expressed in an anecdote told of Mason. Some person brought him a subscription paper for the poems of Ann Yearsley, the inspired milk-maid, describing her as a heaven-bom genius. He gave four-and-sixpence, — " four shillings," he said, " for charity, and the odd six- pence for her heaven-born genius." The work-house, 180 GENIUS. the jail, the penitentiary, are considered to be full of men of genius. The quality is held to be naturally opposed to order, to common-sense, and to worldly success. Even where a man like Burns, or Otway, or Cowper, filled a nation with his fame, it is still remembered that Otway starved to death, that Burns died drunk, that Cowper died mad. " There 's small choice," cries Medi- ocrity, " in rotten apples." People therefore consider genius, at the best, a doubtful benefit : — " The booby father craves a booby son, And by Heaven's blessing thinks himself undone." Now, admitting that Genius, working in bad organiza- tions, and exposed to a continual conflict with surround- ing malignity and stupidity, may end in " despondency and madness," — may seem, as Rousseau's did to Byron, " A tree On fire with lightning, with ethereal flame Kindled and blasted," — yet the fault is not in having too much genius, but in not having genius enough. Take Milton, the invincible ; that adamantine strength of will which made such wild work among the sensualists and renegades of his time, — was not that a portion of his genius ? When a great man sinks into despondency, or fear, or inaction, his genius slumbers or has departed. He is an Achilles, GENIUS. 181 dozing in luxurious sloth, while the plains are ringing with war ; and to him should be addressed the trumpet call of Patroclus : — " Sweet, Rouse thyself ; and the weak, wanton Cupid Shall from your neck unloose his amorous fold, And, like a dew-drop from the lion's mane. Be shook to air ! " Indeed, genius in thought supposes energy of will to rouse energies of intellect, and is the exact opposite of laziness or indulgence. It is self-directed power; energy, which, if it do not come spontaneously, must be induced. As far as it is genius it is labor, the hardest work that man can do, and its discoveries and combinations are earned by the very sweat of the brain. It is true, thoughts seem sometimes to fall into the mind of the poet, like stray birds of paradise ; but be sure they have been lured thither by the poet's potent spells. Again, in the exter- nal activity of men of genms there are great differences, from the physical inertia of Thomson, lazily biting the ripe side of a peach on the tree, his hands thrust immov- ably in his pockets, to the hurricane movement of Byron, who had, if we may believe Mr. Gilfillan, " the activity of a scalded fiend ; " yet the Seasons were as much the result of inward energy as Childe Harold. But the thought of genius, you may say, comes spontaneously, 182 GENIUS. — swift as lightning. Yes ; but that gathering together of forces, which precedes and causes the lightning, — what is that ? The thought of the law of gravitation flashed acrors the mind of Newton ; but the mental labor which for years preceded it, the millions of thoughts which came from that exhaustless fountain before the right one flaohed, — there was the work of a giant. The mind of genius, being vital, grows with exercise; assimilates knowledge into the very life-blood of thought, every new acquisition becortiing additional power ; and though the last result may seem simple, the processes by which it is mastered are complex and mighty. In view of the diffi- culties to be overcome, and the annoyances to be tossed aside, by the original thinker, Buffon defined genius as patience. In the power of patient labor, Newton mod- estly saw the difference between himself and other men. He did not consider that this power of patient labor was his genius ; that continuity and concentration of thought are in proportion to the size and vitality of the thinking principle. Let those who prate about indolent genius conceive of the energy of Scott. At the age of fifty-six he resolutely braced up his energies of mind to pay a debt of six or seven hundred thousand dollars, by litera- ture. In three years he produced thirty volumes. His frame began to break down. Dr. Abercrombie implored him to desist from writing. " I tell you what it is, doc- GENIUS. 183 tor," said Scott, " when Molly puts the kettle on, you might as well say, don't boil ! " This living energy of mind, it is hard to kindle. How many go do^vn to the grave without having known, dur- ing a long life, what thought is ! How many abide in miserable superstitions, victims of every quack in religion, politics and literature, their minds mere collections of chips and hearsays, feeling their degradation, yet prefer- ring it to the labor of mental effort ! This slavery of the soul, these chains clanking upon every utterance of opin- ion, can only be broken by the strength within the man. It is a comparatively easy task to induce men to sacrifice comfort and wealth, to be fanatics, and very brave fanat- ics, for any cruel nonsense which has obtained in the world, — but to induce them to think, — oh ! that is requiring too much for the energies of mortal man ! And yet, forsooth, the world is becoming too intellectual ! We educate the intellect too much ! " My friends," said Dr. Johnson, " clear your minds of cant ! " Indeed, education can hardly be too intellectual, unless by intellectual you mean parrot knowledge, and other modes of mind-slaughter. No education deserves the name, unless it develops thought, — unless it pierces down to the mysterious spiritual principle of mind, and starts that into activity and growth. There, all educa- tion, intellectual, moral, religious, begins ; for morality, 184 GENIUS. > religion, intelligence, have all one foundation in vital thought ; — that is, in thought which conceives all ob- jects with which it deals, whether temporal or eternal, visible or invisible, as living realities, not as barren propositions. Here is the vital principle of all growth in learning, in virtue, in intelligence, in holiness. If this fail, there is no hope : •' The pillared firmament is rottenness, And earth's base built on stubble." Thus force of being, to labor, to create, to pluck out the heart of nature's mystery, — this is the law of genius. It would be impossible here to follow this live and life- giving thought of man in its invasion of the possible and the unknown. Its result is human knowledge, — the sciences of mind and matter, poetry and the plastic arts, with their myriad untraceable influences upon society and individual character. Genius, mental power, wher- ever you look, you see the radiant footprints of its victo- rious progress. It has surrounded your homes with com- fort ; it has given you the command of the blind forces of matter ; it has exalted and consecrated your affections ; it has brought God's immeasurable universe nearer to your hearts and imaginations ; it has made flowers of paradise spring up even in poor men's gardens. And, above all, it is never stationary ; its course being ever onward to new triumphs, its repose but harmonious ac- GENIUS. 185 tivity, its acquisitions but stimulants to discoveries. Answering to nothing but the soul's illimitable energies, it is always the preacher of hope, and brave endeavor, and unwearied, elastic effort. It is hard to rouse in their might these eneigies of thought; but ^vh«t once roused, when felt tingling along every nerve of sensation, the whole inward being thrilling with their enkindling inspi- ration, " And all the God comes rushing on the soul," there seem to be no limits to their capacity, and obsta- cles shrivel into ashes in their fiery path. This deep feel- ing of power and joy, this ecstasy of the living soul, this untamed and untamable energy of Genius, — you can- not check its victorious career as it leaps exultingly from discovery to discovery, new truths ever beckoning implor- ingly in the dim distance, a universe ever opening and expanding before it, and above all a Voice still crying, On I on ! — On ! though the clay fall from the soul's struggling powers ! — On ! though the spirit bum through its garment of flesh, as the sun through mist ! — On ! on! " Along the line of limitless desires." LECTURE VI.* INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. A PKoi\imENT characteristic of the present day, and in many respects an admirable one, is the universal atten- tion given to the subject of bodily health ; but, like many other movements founded on half-truths, it has been pushed by fanaticism into ludicrous perversions. Physi- ology has been systematized into a kind of popular gos- pel, in whose doctrines the soul seems of little import- ance in comparison with the gastric juice. Physic hav- ing become a fashion, a valetudinary air is now the sign of your true coxcomb ; and every idle person has his pet complaint, which he nurses in some genteel infirmary. There is an universal cant about health ; every city and hamlet is beleaguered by the hosts of Hippocrates, the floods of Hydropathy, and the animalculae of Homeop- athy ; and no person can venture into the street without being assaulted by some Hygeian highwayman, who * Delivered before the Literary Socieiies of Dartmouth College, July 25, 1849. INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 187 presents a phial to his head, and demands his patience or his purse. Now, the practical consequence of this deification of the body and worship of dietetics, is to bring men under the dominion of a sickly selfishness and a craven cowardice, while pretending to teach them the physical laws of their being. Man obeys the highest law of his being when he takes his life in his hand, and boldly ventures it for something he values more than self. Life cast away for truth or duty, even for fame or knowledge, is better than life saved for the sake of living. But your true disciple of physiological religion, with his morbid consciousness of that collection of veins, bones, muscles and appetites, which he calls himself, would consider it a monstrous violation of the physical laws of his being to obey a benevolent impulse which endangered a blood-vessel, or to purchase the discovery of a new truth at the expense of deranged digestion : and he would survey with lazy wonder the strange ignorance of How- ard, penetrating into pestilential prisons ; of Washington, exposing his person to a storm of bullets ; of Kidley, serenely yielding his frame to that baptism of fire which enrolled him forever in the glorious army of martyrs. Such acts as these were doubtless violations of physical laws, and prove that heroes are not framed on accurate physiological principles. Indeed, health and disease, in their highest meaning, 188 INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. refer more to the mind than to the body. A code of ethics built on physical laws can but inculcate a selfish, superficial prudence ; and prudence, except in weaklings, will not restrain self-indulgence, and ought not to restrain self-sacrifice. There are no duties, therefore, which are not resolvable into moral duties ; no Ances which ha.xB not their scorpion nest in the heart. Do you suppose that any knowing prattle about the breathing or digesting apparatus will still the hoarse clamor of gluttony and sensuality ? Will it relax the grasp of Satanic pride ? In truth, you will find that prudence without conscience holds but a rein of flax on the wild war-horses of passion. But it is a characteristic weakness of the day to super- ficialize evil; to spread a little cold cream over Pande- monium, erect a nice little earthly paradise upon it, and then to rush into misanthropy because the thin structure instantly melts. Indeed, it is at the very core of the mind that we must search for the principles of health and disease, — in the mysteries of will, intelligence, senti- ment and passion, rather than in the organs which are their instruments or victims. Besides, bodily maladies may be badges of disgrace, or titles of honor; your drunkard and your philosopher may both take their " leap into the dark " from apoplexy ; and there is a great dif- ference between Milton, sacrificing his eyesight from the INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 189 love of liberty, and Byron, sacrificing his digestion from the love of gin. The subject, therefore, to which I would call your attention, is intellectual health and disease, as it exists in individuals and in nations. To one who reflects on the nature and capacity of the human mind, there is some- thing inconceivably awful in its perversions. Look at it as it comes, fresh and plastic, /row its Maker; look at it as it returns, stained and hardened, to its Maker. Con- ceive of a mind, a living soul, with the germs of 'faculties which infinity cannot exhaust, as it first beams upon you in its glad morning of existence ; quivering with life and joy; exulting in the bounding sense of its developing energies ; beautiful, and brave, and generous, and joyous, and free, — the clear, pure spirit bathed in the auroral light of its unconscious immortality : and then follow it, in its dark passage through life, as it stifles and kills, one by one, every inspiration and aspiration of its being, until it becomes but a dead soul entombed in a livinof frame. It may be that a selfish frivolity has sunk it into con- tented worldliness, or given it the vapid air of complacent imbecility. It may be that it is marred and disfigured by the hoof-prints of appetite, its humanity extinguished in the mad tyranny of animal ferocities. It may be that pride has stamped the scowl of hatred upon its front ; that avarice and revenge, set on fire of hell, have blasted and 190 INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. blackened its unselfish affections. The warm sensibility, gushing spontaneously out in world-wide sympathies, — the bright and strong intellect, eager for action and thirsting for truth, — the rapturous devotion, mounting upwards in a pillar of flame to God, — all gone, and only remembered as childish enthusiasm, to point the sneer of the shrewd, and the scoff of the brutal ! Where, in this hard mass of animated clay, wTinlded by cunning or brutalized by selfishness, are the power and joy proph- esied in the aspirations of youth ? '{ Whither hath fled the visionan' gleam ? Where is it now, the glory and the dream ? " To give the philosophy of this mental disease, to sub- ject the mind to that scrutiny which shall account for its perversions, we must pass behind its ordinary operations of understanding, sensibility and imagination, and attempt to clutch its inmost spirit and essence. Now, an analysis of our consciousness, or rather a contemplation of the mysterious processes of our inward life, reveals no facul- ties and no impulses which can be disconnected from our personality. The mind is no collection of self-acting powers and passions, but a vital, indissoluble unit and person, capable, it is true, of great variety of manifesta- tion, but still in its nature a unit, not an aggregate. For the purposes of science, or verbal convenience, we may call its various operations by different names. INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. ]9x according as it perceives, feels, understands or imag- ines ; but the moment science breaks it up into a series of disconnected parts, and considers each part by itself as a separate power, that ' moment the living- principle of mind is lost, and the result is an anar- chy of faculties. Fortunately, however, we cannot free ourselves, by any craft of analysis, from personal pro- nouns. A man who speaks or acts, instinctively men- -tions it as — /said, /did. We do not say that Milton's imagination Vrote Paradise Lost, but that Milton wrote it. There is no mental operation in which the whole mind is not present ; nothing produced but by the joint action of all its faculties, under the direction of its centra], personality. This central principle of mind is spiritual force, — capacity to cause, to create, to assimilate, to be. This underlies all faculties ; interpenetrates, fuses, directs all faculties. This thinks, this feels, this imagines, this worships ; this is what glows with health, this is what is enfeebled and corrupted by disease. Call it what you please, — will, personality, individuality, character, force of being ;^ but recognize it as the true spiritual power which constitutes a living soul. This is the only pecu- liarity which separates the impersonal existence of a vegetable from the personal life of a man. The material universe is instinct with spiritual existence, but only in man is il individualized into spiritual life. 192 INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. Now, there is no such thing as facuUy which has not its root in this personal force. Without this, thought is but insanity, and action, fate. Men do not stumble, and blunder, and happen into Iliads, and iEneids, and Divina Commedias, and Othellos, in a drunken dream of poetic inspiration, but work and grow up to them. It is com- mon, I know, to point to some lazy gentleman, and say that there is a protuberance on his forehead or temple sufficiently large to produce a Hamlet or a Principia, if he only had an active temperament. But the thing which produces Hamlets and Principias is not physical temperament, but spiritual power. What a man does is the real test of what a man is ; and to declare that he has great capacity but nothing great to set his capacity in motion, is an absurdity in terms. This mind, this free spiritual force, cannot grow, cannot even exist, by itself. It can only grow by assim- ilating something external to itself, the very condition of mental life being the exercise of power within on objects \vithout. < The form and superficial qualities of objects it perceives ; their life and spirit it conceives. JOnly what the mind conceives, it assimilates and draws into its own life ; — intellectual conception indicating a penetrating vision into the heart of things, through a fierce, firm exertion of vital creative force. In this distinction between perception and conception, we have a principle INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 193 which accounts for the limited degree in which so many- persons grow in intelligence and character, in grace and gracelessness. Here, also, is the distinction between assent and faith, theory and practice. In the one case, opinions lie on the surface of the mind, mere objects, the truth of which it perceives, but which do not influence its will ; in the other, ideas penetrate into the very sub- stance of the mind, become one with it, and are springs of living thought and action. For instance, you may cram whole folios of morality and divinity into the heads of Dick Turpin and Captain Kidd, and both will cordially assent to their truth ; but the captives of Dick's blunderbuss will still have to give up their purses, and the prisoners of Kidd's piracy will still have to walk the plank. On the other hand, you may pour all varieties of immoral opinions and images into the understanding of a pure and high nature, and there they will remain, unassimilated, uncorrupting ; his mind, like that of Ion, " Though shapes of ill May hover round its surfacCj glides in light, And takes no shadow from them." In accordance with the same principle, all knowledge, however imposing in its appearance, is but superficial knowledge, if it be merely the mind's furniture, not the mind's nutriment. It must be transmuted into mind, as food is into blood, to become wisdom and power. There 13 194 INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. is many a liuman parrot and memory-monger, who has read and who recollects more history than Wehster ; but in Webster, history has become judgment, foresight, executive force, mind. That seemingly instinctive sa- gacity, by which an able man does exactly the right thing at the right moment, is nothing but a collection of facts thus assimilated into thought. This power of instanta- neous action without reflection is the only thing which saves men in great emergencies ; but far from being inde- pendent of knowledge and experience, it is their noblest result. Many of the generals opposed to Napoleon understood military science as well as he did ; but he beat them on every occasion where victory depended on a wise movement made at a moment's thought, because science had been transfused into his mind, while it was only attached to theirs. Every truly practical man, whether he be merchant, mechanic, or agriculturalist, thus transmutes his experience into intelligence, until his will operates with the celerity of instinct. In the order of intellectual development, intuition does not precede observation and reflection, but is their last perfection. First, slow steps, cautious examination, comparison, rea- soning; then, thought and action, swift, sharp and sure, as the lightning. If the mind thus grows by assimilating external objects, it is plain that the character of the objects it INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 195 assimilates will determine the form of its development, and its health or disease. Mental health consists in the self-direction of mental power, in the capacity to perceive its own relations to objects and the relations of objects to each other, and to choose those which will conduce to its enlargement and elevation. Disease occurs both when it loses its self-direction, and its self-distrust. When it loses its self-direction, it surrenders itself to every outward impression ; when it loses its self-distrust, it surrenders itself to every inward whim. In the one case, it loses ail moral and intellectual character, becomes unstrung, sen- timental, dissolute, with feebleness at the very heart of its being ; in the other, it perversely misconceives and discolors external things, views eveiy object as a mirror of §elf, and, havmg no reverence for aught above itself, subsides into a poisonous mass of egotism, conceit, and falsehood. Thus disease occurs both when the mind loses itself in objects, and when objects are lost in it, — when it parts with will, and when it becomes wilful. The last consequence of will submerged is sensuality, brutality, slavishness; the last consequence of will perverted is Satanic pride. Now, it is an almost universal law, that the diseased weak, the men of unrestrained appetites, shall become the victims and slaves of the diseased strong, the men of unrestrained wills, and that the result of this relation shall be misery, decay and death, to both. Here 196 INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. is the principle of all slavery, political, intellectual, and religious, in individuals and in compiunities. Thus if the primitive principle of mind be simply the capacity to assimilate external objects, and if objects in this process become mind and character, it is obvious that self-direction, — the power to choose, to resist, to act in^eference to law, and not from the impulse of desire, — is the condition of health and enduring strength. Let us now consider how these objects, — which may be included under the general terms of nature and other minds, — influence for evil or good the individual soul, according as their impulse is blindly followed, wilfully perverted, or genially assimilated. The objects which have the most power over the mind are probably those in visible nature which refer to appe- tite and passion. These are continually striving to draw the mind into themselves, to weaken the force at its cen- tre and soul, to reduce it into mere perception and sen- sation, and to destroy its individual life. The emotion which accompanies this yielding of the mind to death has, with a bitterness of irony never excelled by man or demon, been called pleasure. Now, it is a mistake which is apt to vitiate theology, to confound will with wilful- ness, and to make destruction of will the condition of rising to God. But will weakened, or will destroyed, ever goes downwards. It delivers itself to sensuality, — or INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 197 to fanaticism, which is the sensuality of the religious sentiment, — not to spirituality, not to Deity. A being placed like man among strong and captivating visible objects, becomes, the moment he loses self-direction, a slave, in the most terribly comprehensive meaning of that all-annihilating word ; and I believe the doctrine runs not that we are slaves, but children of God. Will is also often confounded with wilfulness in the metaphysics of that assthetic criticism which deals with the grandest creations of genius. The highest mood of the mind is declared to be that where it loses its individ- uality in the objects it contemplates ; where it becomes objective and healthy, in distinction from subjective or morbid. This objectiveness is confounded with self- abandonment, and thus causative force is absurdly denied while treating of the soul's creative acts. But it is not by self-abandonment that the far-darting, all-assimilating intellect of Genius identifies itself for the moment with its conceptions ; it is rather by the sublimest exercise of will and central force. Let us take, in illustration, three poets, in an ascending scale of intellectual prece- dence ; — Keats, the representative of sensitiveness ; By- ron, of wilfulness ; Shakspeare, of self-direction. Now, in Keats, — a mind of immense spontaneous fruitfulness, — a certain class of objects take his intellect captive, melt and merge his individual being in themselves, are 19S INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. Stronger than he, and hold him in a state of soft diffu- sion in their own nature. The impression left on the imagination is of sensuous beauty, but spiritual weak- ness. Then Byron, arrogant, domineering, egotistic, diseased, — viewing nature and man altogether in relation to himself, and spuming the objective laws of things, — forces objects, with autocratic insolence, into the shape of his own morbid nature, stamps them with his mark, and leaves the impression of intense, narrow, wilful energy. But Shakspeare, the strongest of creative intel- lects, and comprehensive because he was strong, passes, by the gigantic force of his will, into the heart of other natures ; is sensuous, impassioned, witty, beautiful, sub- lime, and terrible, at pleasure ; rises by the same force with which he stoops ; in his most prodigious exertions of energy ever observes laws instead of obeying caprice ; comprehends all his creations without being compre- hended by them ; and comes out at the ertd, not Fal- stafT, or Faulconbridgc, or Hamlet, or Timon, or Lear, or Perdita, but Shakspeare, the beneficent and august intellect which includes them all. The difference be- tween him and other poets is, that, in virtue of passing into another life by force of will, not by being draun in by force of the object, he could escape from it with ease, and proceed to animate other existences, thus keeping his mind constantly assimilating and working with INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 199 nature. Keats was drawn into his particular class of objects, and could not get out. Byron drew objects into himself, and then poisoned them by capriciously distort- ing and discoloring their essential character. Keats would have stayed with Perdita ; Byron, with Timon. Let us next consider, in further illustration of our theme, those potent forces which come, through history, through literature, and through social communion, from other minds, and from whose action a continual stream of influences is pouring in upon the individual soul. Those which proceed from society, to benefit or corrupt, are so obvious that it is needless to emphasize their power. Look around any community, and you find it dotted over with men, marked and ticketed as not belong- ing to themselves, but to some other man, from whom they take their literature, their politics, their religion. They are willing captives of a stronger nature ; feed on his life as though it were miraculous manna rained from heaven ; complacently parade his name as an adjective to point out their own ; and give wonderful pertinence to that nursery rhyme, whose esoteric depth irradiates even its exoteric expression : — " Whose dog are you ? I am Billy Patton's dog, Whose dog are you 7 " This social servility, as seen in its annual harvest of 200 INTELLECTUAL HEALTH JlSB DISEASE. dwindled souls, abject in everything, from the tie of a neckcloth to the points of a creed, is a sufficiently strong indication of the tyranny which a few forcible persons can establish in any of our " free and enlightened" com- munities ; but perhaps a more subtle influence than that which proceeds from social relations, comes from that abstract and epitome of the whole mind of the whole world, which we find in history and literature. Here the thought and action of the race are broug-ht home to the individual intelligence ; and the danger is, that we make what should be our emancipation an instrument of servi- tude, fall a victim to one author or one age, and lose the power of learning from many minds, by sinking into the contented vassal of one; and end, at last, in an inteUectual resemblance to that gentleman who only knew two tunes, "one of which," he said, "was Old Hundred, and the other — was n't." The danger to individuality, in reading, is not that we lepeat an author's opinions or expressions, but that we be magnetized by his spirit to the extent of being drawn into his stronger life, and losing our partic- ular being. Now, no man is benefited by being con- quered ; and the most modest might say to the mightiest, — to Homer, to Dante, to Milton, to Goethe, — " Keep off, gentlemen, — not so near, if you please ; you can do me vast service, provided you do not swallow me up ; my personal being is small, but allow me to say of it, as INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 201 Touchstone said of Audrey, his wife, ' A poor thing, sir, but mine own.' " Indeed, we can never fully realize and reverence a great nature, never grow through a reception of his spirit, unless we keep our individuality distinct from his. In the case of a large and diseased mind, the caution be- comes more important. The most popular poet of the present century is so in consequence of the weakness of his readers, who are not so much his pupils as his slaves. Byron, in virtue of his superior force, breaks into their natures, so to speak, — passes into the very core of their moral and intellectual being, — makes them live, in thought, his life, — Byronizes them : and the result of , the conquest is a horde of minor Byrons, with their thin dilutions of misanthropy and licentiousness, not half so good as the original Peter and John they have delivered up. " It was nae great head in itsell," said the old Scotchwoman, as that of Duke Hamilton rolled from the block, ''but it was a sair loss to him." — In view of the enfeebling and corrupting influence exercised by a mor- bid nature, one is reminded of the anecdote told of White- Held, the preacher. A drunkard once reeled up to him, with the remark, — "Mr. Whitefield, I am one of your converts." — "I think it very likely," was the reply, " for I am sure you are none of God's." The truth probably is, that the fallacies on this subject 202 INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. of will and personality, in matters pertaining both to intellect and morals, have their source in man's hatred to work, to the independent exercise of power ; accordingly he tries, cunningly enough, to ignore the fact that work is the law by which the mind gTow^s, and affects reverie, the opium-eating of the intellect, and calls it thinking. Theology and philosophy are both apt to be pervaded by a kind of pantheism, in which the perfection of our nature is represented to consist in merging the soul in universal being, and its heaven a state where it loses itself in a sea of delicious sensations. It is needless to add that many realize a tolerable heaven of their kind — on earth. Passing from the individual to the community, let us now survey the two forms of mental disease, self-worship and self-abandonment, as expressed in the history of states. A nation is no more a mere collection of indi- viduals, than an individual is a mere collection of facul- ties. It has a national life, more or less peculiar in its features, and subject to disease and decay ; and of this national life its form of civilization is the embodiment. Now, in the earlier ages of the world, in the childliood of humanity, the characteristic form of mental disease is feebleness of personal b^ing, and the consequent absorp- tion of the individual in surrounding objects. He deifies and worships every form and expression of external power, perceiving a god, audible or visible, in every out- INTELLECTUAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. 203 ward force. He is, of course, the natural prey of craft, ferocity, and tyranny, and his weakness is perverted into a besotted superstition, and a worship even of beasts and ihdnimate idols. Such were the myriads of that dark ll