THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES CHATTERTON CHATTERTON A BIOGRAPHY BY DAVID MASSON, LL.D., EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH NEW AND REVISED EDITION LONDON HODDER AND STOUGHTON 27 PATERNOSTER ROW 1899 Edinburgh : T. and A. CONSTABLE, Printers to Her Majesty College Library 33H3 M3S PREFATORY NOTE THIS Biography, published originally in 1856 as part of a volume of Collected Essays, and sub- sequently in similar companionship, is now re-issued by itself, after having been for a considerable time out of print. There has been some revision through- out, and the concluding chapter has been much enlarged. EDINBURGH : November 1899. CONTENTS PART I. BRISTOL CHAPTER I PAGE WILKES AND LIBERTY ... 3 CHAPTER II THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE OF BRISTOL . n CHAPTER III BOUND FOR LONDON .... 90 PART II. LONDON CHAPTER I SHOREDITCH . . . . . -.Ill CHAPTER II TOWN-TALK LONG AGO . . . . ., 134 viii CONTENTS CHAPTER III PAGE SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE . IS 2 CHAPTER IV BROOKE STREET, HOLBORN . . 217 CHAPTER V THE JUDGMENT OF POSTERITY .... 273 PART I BRISTOL CHAPTER I WILKES AND LIBERTY WAS there ever a time that did not think highly of its own importance ? Was there ever a time when the world did not believe itself to be going to pieces, and when alarming pamphlets on ' the present crisis ' did not lie unbought on the counters of the book- sellers ? Poor mortals that we are, how we do make the most of our own little portion in the general drama of history ! Nor are we quite wrong, after all. There is nothing really to laugh at in our laborious anxieties about this same 'present crisis,' which is always happening, and never over. 'We live in earnest times ' : what is there in the incessant repe- tition of this stereotyped phrase but an explicit assertion by each generation for itself that the great sense of life, transmitted already through so many generations, is now, in turn, passing through in The time when we ourselves are alive, the time when our eyes behold the light, and when the breath is strong in our nostrils, that is the crisis for us ; and, 4 CHATTERTON although it belongs to a higher than we to determine the worth of what we do, yet that we should do everything with a certain amount of vehemence and bustle seems but the necessary noise of the shuttle as we weave forth our allotted portion of the general web of existence. Well, many years ago, there was a ' crisis ' in England. It was the time, reader, when our great- great-grandfathers, intent on bringing about your existence and mine, were, for that purpose, paying court to our reluctant great-great-grandmothers. George III., an obese young sovereign of thirty-three, had been then ten years on the throne. Newspapers were not so numerous as now ; Parliament was not open to reporters ; and, had gentlemen of the Liberal press been alive, with their present political opinions, every soul of them would have been hanged. Nevertheless, people got on very well ; and there was enough for a nation of seven millions to take interest in and talk about when they were in an inquisitive humour. Lord North, an ungainly country gentleman, with goggle eyes and big cheeks, had just succeeded the Duke of Grafton as the head of a Tory ministry ; Lord Chatham, throwing off his gout for the occasion, had, at the age of sixty-two, resumed his place as the thundering Jove of the WILKES AND LIBERTY 5 Opposition ; Bute and other Scotsmen were still said to be sucking the blood of the nation ; and Edmund Burke, then in the prime of his strength and intellect, was publishing masterly pamphlets, and trying to construct, under the auspices of the Marquis of Rockingham, a new Whig party. Among the notabilities out of Parliament were Dr. Samuel Johnson, then past his sixty-first year, and a most obstinate old Tory, his friend Sir Joshua Reynolds, fourteen years younger, Goldy, several years younger still, and Garrick, fifty-four years of age, but as sprightly as ever. In another circle, but not less prominently before the town, were Parson Home and Mrs. Macaulay ; and all England was ringing with the terrible letters of the invisible Junius. But the man of the hour, the hero of the self-dubbed crisis, was John Wilkes. Arrested in 1763, on account of the publication of No. 45 of the North Briton, in which one of the King's speeches had been severely commented on ; discharged a few days afterwards in consequence of his privilege as a Member of Parliament ; lifted in- stantaneously by this accident into an unexampled blaze of popular favour ; persecuted all the more on this account by the Court party ; at last, in January 1764, expelled from his seat in the House of 6 CHATTERTON Commons by a vote declaring him to be a seditious libeller ; put on his trial thereafter before the court of Queen's Bench, and escaping sentence only by a voluntary flight to France : this squint-eyed per- sonage, known up to that time only as a profligate wit about town, who lived on his wife's money and fascinated other women in spite of his ugliness, had now been for six years the idol and glory of England. For six years ' Wilkes and Forty-five ' had been chalked on the walls, ' Wilkes and Liberty ' had been the cry of the mobs, and portraits of Wilkes had hung in the windows of the print-shops. Re- membering that he was the champion of liberal opinions, even pious Dissenters had forgotten his atheism and his profligacy. They distinguished, they said, between the man himself and the cause which he represented. For a year or two the patriot had been content with the mere echo of this applause as it was wafted to him in Paris. But, cash failing him there, and the Parliament from which he had been ejected having been dissolved, he had returned to England early in 1768, had offered himself as a candidate for the City of London, had lost that election, but had almost instantly afterwards been returned for the County of Middlesex. Hereupon he had ventured to surrender WILKES AND LIBERTY 7 himself to the process of the law ; and the result had been his condemnation, in June 1768, to pay a fine of 1000, and undergo an imprisonment of twenty- two months. Nor had this been all. No sooner had Parliament met than it had proceeded to expel the member for Middlesex. Then had begun the tug of war between Parliament and the People. Thirteen days after his expulsion, the exasperated electors of Middlesex had again returned Wilkes as their repre- sentative, no one having dared to oppose him. Again the House had expelled him, and again the electors had returned him. Not till after the fourth farce of election had the contest ceased. On that occasion three other candidates had presented themselves ; and one of them, Colonel Luttrell, having polled 296 votes, had been declared by the House to be duly elected, notwithstanding that the votes for Wilkes had been four times as numerous. Tremendous, then, had been the outcry of popular indignation. During the whole of the years 1768 and 1769 ' the violation of the right of election by parliamentary despotism ' had been the great topic of the country ; and in the beginning of 1770 this was still the question of the hour, the question forced by the people into all other discussions, and regarding which all candidates for popular favour, from Chatham himself down to the 8 CHATTERTON parish beadle, were obliged distinctly to declare themselves. Meanwhile Wilkes was in the King's Bench, Southwark. His consolations, we may suppose, were that by all this his popularity had been but increased, that Parson Home and the Society for the Protection of the Bill of Rights had organised a sub- scription in his favour which would more than pay his fine, and that the whole country was waiting to do him honour on the day when he should step out of prison. It came at last: Tuesday, the i/th of April 1770. There was a considerable show of excitement all day in the vicinity of the prison ; and it was with some difficulty that the patriot, getting into a hackney- coach late in the afternoon, made his way, past the cordial clutches of the mob, into the country. That evening and the next there were huzzas and illu- minations in his honour; the house of Beckford, the Lord Mayor, in the then aristocratic region of Soho Square, was conspicuously decorated with the word ' Liberty ' ; and public dinners to celebrate the release of the patriot were held in various parts of the City. The rejoicings were not confined to London. In many other towns in England there were demonstra- WILKES AND LIBERTY 9 tions in honour of Wilkes. A list of the chief places may still be culled from the newspapers of the day. From those newspapers we learn, what indeed might have been independently surmised, that not the least eager among the towns of England in this emulous show of regard for Wilkes was the ancient mercan- tile city of Bristol. The following appeared in the Public Advertiser of London, as from a Bristol correspondent, on the very day of Wilkes's release : ' Bristol, April \^th. We hear that on Wednesday next, being the day of Mr. Wilkes's enlargement, forty-five persons are to dine at the "Crown," in the passage leading from Broad Street to Tower Lane. The entertainment is to consist of two rounds of beef, of 45 Ibs. each ; two legs of veal, weighing 45 Ibs. ; two ditto of pork, 45 Ibs. ; a pig, roasted, 45 Ibs. ; two puddings of 45 Ibs. ; 45 loaves; and, to drink, 45 tankards of ale. After dinner, they are to smoke 45 pipes of tobacco, and to drink 45 bowls of punch. Among others, the following toasts are to be given : i. Long live the King; 2. Long live the supporters of British Liberty; 3. The Magistrates of Bristol. And the dinner to be on the table exactly 45 minutes after two o'clock.' Whether the precise dinner thus announced by the Bristol correspondent of the Public Advertiser was held or not must, we fear, remain a mystery ; but that there were several dinners in Bristol on the occasion is quite certain. On Thursday, the , in particular, a public entertainment (possibly io CHATTERTON the above, with the day altered) was given in honour of the patriot by ' an eminent citizen,' and attended by many of the most influential men in the place. Ah ! the poetry of coincidences ! On that same Thursday evening, while the assembled guests in the ' Crown ' were clattering their glasses in the hot room, puffing their tobacco-smoke, and making the roof ring with their tipsy uproar, there was walking moodily through the streets of Bristol a young attorney's apprentice, who, four days before, had been discharged from his employment because he had alarmed his master by threatening to commit suicide. This attorney's apprentice was Thomas Chatterton. CHAPTER II THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE OF BRISTOL IT was in the month of August 1760 that a poor widow, who supported herself and two children by dressmaking, and by keeping a small day-school in one of the back streets of Bristol, gained admission for her younger child, a boy of seven years and nine months old, into Colston's School, a charitable foundation similar in some respects to Christ's Hospital in London. The husband of this widow, a rough, drunken fellow, who had been a singer or sub-chanter in the cathedral choir of Bristol, as well as the master of a kind of free school for boys, had died a month or two before his son's birth. An old grandmother, however either the widow's own mother or her husband's was still alive, dependent, in some degree, on the family. For nearly seven years, or from August 1760 to July 1767, the boy remained an inmate of Colston's School, wearing, as the Christ's Hospital boys in London did, a blue coat and yellow stockings, 11 12 CHATTERTON and receiving, according to the custom of the institution, such a plain education as might fit him for an ordinary mercantile or mechanical occupa- tion. But from the very first the boy was singular. For one thing, he was a prodigious reader. The Bible, theological treatises, scraps of history, old magazines, poetry, whatever in the shape of a printed volume came in his way all were eagerly pounced upon and devoured ; and it was not long before his reputation in this respect enabled him to lay one or two circulating libraries under friendly contribution. Then, again, his temper, people remarked, had some- thing in it quite unusual in one so young. Generally very sullen and silent, he was liable to sudden and unaccountable fits of weeping, as well as to violent fits of rage. He was also extremely secretive, and fond of being alone ; and on Saturday and other holiday afternoons, when he was at liberty to go home from school, it was a subject of speculation with his mother, Mrs. Chatterton, and her acquaint- ances, what the boy could be doing, sitting alone for hours, as was his habit, in a garret full of all kinds of out-of-the-way lumber. When he was about ten years of age, it became known to some of his seniors that the little Bluecoat was in the habit of writing verses. It is supposed THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 13 that a taste for that exercise had been roused in him, as well as in other boys in Colston's School, by the usher or under-master of the school, a Mr. Thomas Phillips, who himself dabbled in literature, and contributed to periodicals. If so, however, the little pupil does not seem to have taken even the usher into his confidence originally, but to have proceeded on his own account. His first known attempt in verse had been a pious little achievement, entitled ' On the Last Epiphany ; or, Christ's coming to Judgment'; and so proud had he been of this performance, and so ambitious of seeing it in print, that he boldly dropped it, one Saturday afternoon, into the letter-box of Felix Farley's Bristol Journal, a weekly newspaper in high local repute. It appeared in the columns of that newspaper on the 8th of January 1763. From that day Chatterton was a sworn poet. Piece after piece was dropped by him during a period of three years into the letter-box of the accommodating Journal. Only one of these, however, is it necessary to mention particularly a little lampoon, printed on the 7th of January 1764, and entitled 'The Churchwarden and the Apparition; a Fable.' A Mr. Joseph Thomas, a brickmaker by trade, chancing in that year to hold the office of churchwarden for the parish of St. Mary Redcliffe, 14 CHATTERTON had greatly scandalised the public mind by causing the old churchyard to be levelled, and the surplus earth and clay to be carted away, as people said, for his own professional uses. For this outrage on decorum he was much attacked by the local press, and nowhere more severely than in the above- mentioned verses of the little Bluecoat ; in whom, by the bye, there must have been a kind of heredi- tary resentment of such a piece of sacrilege, as his ancestors, the Chattertons, had been sextons of the church of St. Mary Redcliffe for a period of one hundred and fifty years continuously. The office had, in fact, only passed out of the family on the death of an older brother of his father, named John Chatterton. The date does not seem quite certain, but it was probably nearly three years after this occurrence, and when Chatterton was above fourteen years of age, and one of the senior boys in the Bluecoat School, that he stepped, one afternoon, into the shop of a Mr. Burgum, partner of a Mr. Catcott in the pewter trade. ' I have found out a secret about you, Mr. Burgum,' he said, going up to the pewterer at his desk. ' Indeed : what is it ? ' said Mr. Burgum. THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 15 ' That you are descended from one of the noblest families in England.' ' I did not know it,' said the victim. ' It is true, though,' said Chatterton ; ' and, to prove it, I will bring you your pedigree written out, as I have traced it by the help of books of the peerage and old parchments.' Accordingly, a few days afterwards, he again called, and presented the astonished pewterer with a manuscript copybook, headed in large text as follows : ' Account of the Family of the De Berghams, from the Norman Conquest to this Time ; collected from original Records, Tournament Rolls, and the Heralds of March and Garter Records, by T. Chatterton.' In this document the Burgum pedigree was elaborately traced up, through no end of great names and illustrious intermarriages, to one ' Simon de Seyncte Lyze, alias Senliz,' who had come into England with the Conqueror, married a daughter of the Saxon chief Waltheof, become possessed of Burgham Castle in Northumberland and other properties, and been eventually created Earl of Northampton. Pleased with the honours thus unexpectedly thrust upon him, the pewterer gave the Bluecoat five shillings for his trouble. To show his gratitude, i6 CHATTERTON Chatterton soon returned with 'A Continuation of the Account of the Family of the De Berghams from the Norman Conquest to this time.' In the original pedigree the young genealogist had judiciously stopped short at the sixteenth century. In the supplement, however, he ventures as far down as the reign of Charles II., back to which point the pewterer is left to supply the links for himself. But the chief feature in the pedigree, as elaborated in the second document, is that, in addition to other great names, it contains a poet. This poet, whose name was John de Bergham, was a monk of the Cistercian order in Bristol ; he had been educated at Oxford ; and he was ' one of the greatest ornaments of the age in which he lived.' He wrote several books, and translated some part of the Iliad, under the title of ' Romance of Troy.' To give Mr. Burgum some idea of the poetic style of this distinguished man, his ancestor, there was inserted a short poem of his in the ancient dialect, entitled ' The Romaunte of the Cnychte ' ; and, to render the meaning of the poem more intelligible, there was appended a modern metrical paraphrase of it by Chatterton himself. By the tclat of this wonderful piece of genea- logical and heraldic ingenuity done for Mr. Burgum, as well as by the occasional exercise in a more or THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE i less public manner of his talent for verse-making, Chatterton, already recognised as the first for attain- ments among all the lads in Colston's School, appears to have won a kind of reputation with a few persons of the pewterer's stamp out of doors honest people, with small pretensions to literature them- selves, but willing to encourage a clever boy whose mother was in poor circumstances. It was probably through the influence of such persons that, after having been seven years at the school, he was removed from it, in July 1767, to be apprenticed to Mr. John Lambert, a Bristol attorney. The trustees of Colston's School paid to Lambert, on the occasion, a premium of ten pounds ; and the arrangement was that Chatterton should be bound to him for seven years, during which period he was to board and lodge in Mr. Lambert's house, his mother undertaking to wash and mend for him. There was no salary ; but, as happens in such cases, there were probably means in Bristol by which a lad writing a neat clerk's hand, as Chatterton did, could hope to earn now and then a few stray shillings. At any rate, he had the prospect of finding himself, at the end of seven years, in a fair way to be a Bristol attorney. Lambert's office-hours were from eight in the B 1 8 CHATTERTON morning till eight in the evening, with an interval for dinner. From eight till ten in the evening the apprentice was at liberty ; but he was required to be home at his master's house, which was at some distance from the office, punctually by ten. An indignity which he felt very much, and more than once complained of, was that by the household arrangements, which were under the control of an old lady, his master's mother, he was sent to take his meals in the kitchen, and made to sleep with the footboy. To set against this, however, there was the advantage of plenty of spare time ; for, as Lambert's business was not very extensive, the apprentice was often left alone in the office with nothing special to do, and at liberty to amuse himself as he liked. From copying letters and precedents, he could turn to Camderis Britannia, an edition of which lay on the office-shelves, to Holinshed's Chronicles, to Speghfs Chaucer, to Geoffrey of Monmouth, or to any other book that he could borrow from a library and smuggle in for his private recreation. Sometimes also, the tradition goes, his master, entering the office unexpectedly, would catch him writing verses, and would lecture him on the subject. Once the offence was still more serious. An anonymous abusive letter had been sent to Mr. Warner, the head-master THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 19 of Colston's School ; and, by the texture of the paper and other evidences, this letter was traced to the ex-Bluecoat of Mr. Lambert's office, whose reasons for sending it had probably been personal. On this occasion his master was so exasperated as to strike him. A young attorney's apprentice, of proud and sullen temper, discontented with his situation, ambitious, conscious of genius, yet treated as a boy and menial servant : such was Chatterton during the two years that followed his removal from the Bluecoat School. To this add the want of pocket-money ; for, busy as he was with his master's work and his own secret exercises in the way of literature, it is still authenti- cally known that he found time of an evening not only to drop in pretty regularly at his mother's house, but also to do as other attorneys' apprentices did, and prosecute such little amusements as all apprentices like to find practicable. Altogether, the best glimpse we have of Chatterton in his commoner aspect as an attorney's apprentice in Bristol is that which we get from a letter written by him, during his first year with Mr. Lambert, to a youth named Baker, who had been his chum at Colston's School, and had emigrated to America. Baker had written to him from South Carolina, informing him, amongst other 20 CHATTERTON things, that he had fallen in love with an American belle, of the name of Hoyland, whose charms had obscured his memory of the Bristol fair ones, and begging him, it would also appear, to woo the Muses in his favour, and transmit him across the Atlantic a poem or two, to be presented to Miss Hoyland. Chatterton complies, and sends a long letter, begin- ning with a few amatory effusions to Miss Hoyland, such as Baker wanted, and concluding thus 1 March 6th, 1768 ' DEAR FRIEND, I must now close my poetical labours, my master being returned from London. You write in a very entertaining style ; though I am afraid mine will be to the contrary. Your celebrated Miss Rumsey is going to be married to Mr. Fowler, as he himself informs me. Pretty children ! about to enter into the comfortable yoke of matri- mony, to be at their liberty ; just apropos to the old saw, "But out of the frying-pan into the fire." For a lover, heavens mend him! but for a husband, oh, excellent! What a female Machiavel this Miss Rumsey is ! A very good mistress of nature, to discover a demon in the habit of a parson ; to find a spirit so well adapted to the humour of an English wife ; that is, one who takes off his hat to every person he chances to meet, to show his staring horns ! . . . O mirabile, what will human nature degenerate into ? Fowler aforesaid declares he makes a scruple of conscience of being too free with Miss Rumsey before marriage. There's a gallant for you ! Why, a girl with anything of the woman would despise him for it. But no more of this. I am glad you approve of the ladies in Charlestown, and am obliged to you for the compliment of including me in your happiness. THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 21 My friendship is as firm as the white rock when the black waves war around it and the waters burst on its hoary top ; when the driving wind ploughs the sable sea, and the rising waves aspire to the clouds, turning with the rattling hail. So much for heroics; to speak plain English, I am, and ever will be, your unalterable friend. I did not give your love to Miss Rumsey, having not seen her in private ; and in public she will not speak to me, because of her great love to Fowler, and on another occasion. I have been violently in love these three-and-twenty times since your departure, and not a few times came off victorious. I am obliged to you for your curiosity, and shall esteem it very much, not on account of itself, but as coming from you. The poems, etc., on Miss Hoyland, I wish better, for her sake and yours. The Tournament I have only one canto of, which I send herewith ; the remainder is entirely lost. I am, with the greatest regret, going to subscribe myself your faithful and constant friend till death do us part. ' THOMAS CHATTERTON. To MR. BAKER, Charlestown, South Carolina.' When Chatterton wrote this letter he was fifteen years and four months old. To its tone as illustra- tive of certain parts of his character we shall have yet to refer ; meanwhile let us attend to the mention made in it of the Tournament, one canto of which is said to be sent along with it. The poem here meant is doubtless the antique dramatic fragment published among Chatterton's writings in the assumed guise of an original poem of the fifteenth century, descrip- tive of a tournament held at Bristol in the reign of 22 CHATTERTON Edward I. From the manner of the allusion it is clear that as early as this period of Chatterton's life that is, before the close of the first year of his apprenticeship he was in the habit of showing about to some of his private friends poems in an antique style, which he represented as genuine antiques copied from old parchments in his pos- session. It was not, however, till about six months after the date of the foregoing epistle that he made his debut, in the professed character of an antiquarian and proprietor of ancient manuscripts, before the good folks of Bristol generally. In September 1768 a new bridge was opened at Bristol with much civic pomp and ceremony. While the excitement was still fresh, the antiquaries of the town were startled by the appearance in Felix Farley's Journal of a very interesting account of the ceremonies that had attended the similar open- ing, several centuries before, of the old bridge which had just been superseded. This account, communicated by an anonymous correspondent signing himself ' Dunhelmus Bristoliensis,' purported to be taken from an old manuscript contemporary with the occurrence. It described how the opening of the old bridge had taken place on a ' Fridaie ' ; how, on that 'Fridaie,' the ceremonies had been begun THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 23 by one ' Master Greggorie Dalbenye,' who went ' aboute the tollynge of the tenth clock ' to inform Master Mayor ' all thyngs were prepared ' ; how the procession to the bridge had consisted, first, of ' two Beadils streying fresh stre,' then of a man dressed as 'a Saxon Elderman,' then of 'a mickle strong manne in armour carrying a huge anlace [i.e. sword],' then of ' six claryons and minstrels,' then of ' Master Mayor' on a white horse, then of 'the Eldermen and Cittie Brothers ' on sable horses, and, finally, of 'the preests, parish, mendicant, and seculor, some synging Saincte Warburgh's song, others sounding claryons thereto, and others some citrialles'; how, when the procession had reached the bridge, the ' manne with the anlace ' took his station on a mound reared in the middle of it ; how the rest gathered round him, 'the preests and freers, all in white albs, making a most goodlie shewe,' and singing ' the song of Saincte Baldwyn ' ; how, when this was done, ' the manne on the top threwe with greet myght his anlace into the see, and the claryons sounded an auntiant charge and forloyn ' ; how then there was more singing, and at the town-cross a Latin sermon ' preeched by Ralph de Blundeville ' ; and how the day was ended by festivities, the per- formance of the play of ' The Knyghtes of Bristowe ' 24 CHATTERTON by the friars of St. Augustine, and the lighting of a great bonfire on Kynwulph Hill. The antiquaries of the town were eager to know the anonymous ' Dunhelmus Bristoliensis ' who had contributed this perfectly novel document to the archives of Bristol ; and they succeeded in identify- ing him with Mr. Lambert's singular apprentice the discoverer, as they would now learn, of a similar piece of antiquity in the shape of a pedigree for Mr. Burgum, the pewterer. Examined, coaxed, and threatened, on the subject of his authority, Chatter- ton prevaricated, but at last adhered to the assertion that the manuscript in question was one of a collec- tion which had belonged to his father, who had obtained them from the large chest or coffer in the muniment-room of the church of St. Mary Redcliffe. And here, whether owing to his obstinacy or to the stupidity of the inquisitors, the matter was allowed to rest The general impression that followed the dis- covery of the author of the communication relative to the opening of the old bridge was that Mr. Lambert's apprentice was really a very extraordi- nary lad, who, besides being a poet in a small way, was a dabbler in antiquities, and had somehow or other become possessed, as he said himself, of THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 25 valuable materials respecting the history of Bristol. Accordingly he became, in some sense, a local celebrity. Among the persons who now took him by the hand, if they had not been already acquainted with him, at least three were of some name and importance in Bristol : Mr. George Catcott, the partner of Mr. Burgum ; his brother, the Rev. Alexander Catcott, vicar of one of the Bristol parish-churches ; and Mr. Barrett, a surgeon in good practice. Two of these had a reputation for literary ability. Mr. William Barrett, the surgeon, was not only a sedate and prosperous professional man, but also a zealous antiquarian, and was known to be engaged in writing a History of Bristol. The Rev. Mr. Catcott had written a book in support of the Noachian view of the Deluge, and was therefore, according to Chatterton's delineations of him, a kind of oracle on scientific subjects at Bristol tea-parties, where, ' shewing wondering cits his fossil store,' he would expound his orthodox theory of springs, rocks, mountains, and strata. What the clerical Catcott was at refined tea-parties his coarser brother, the pewterer, was at taverns. Chatterton thus hits him off ' So at Llewellyn's your great brother sits, The laughter of his tributary wits, 26 CHATTERTON Ruling the noisy multitude with ease, Empties his pint, and sputters his decrees.' Besides the two Catcotts, Barrett, and Burgum (with whom is associated, in a vague way, the Rev. Mr. Broughton, vicar of St. Mary Redcliffe), the following are more or less heard of as among the acquaintances of Chatterton in Bristol during his apprenticeship in Mr. Lambert's office : Mr. Thomas Phillips, the usher or under-master of Colston's School, already mentioned ; Mr. Matthew Mease, a vintner ; Messrs. Allen and Broderip, two musicians and church-organists of the town ; Mr. Clayfield, a distiller, ' a worthy, generous man ' ; Mr. Alcock, a miniature-painter ; T. Gary, a pipe-maker ; H. Kator, a sugar-baker ; William Smith, a player ; J. Rudhall, an apothecary's apprentice ; and James Thistlethwaite, who had been a Colston's charity-boy with Chatterton, and had been apprenticed to a Bristol stationer. There are references also to some acquaintances of the other sex: Mrs. Baker, Mrs. Carty, Miss Webb, Miss Sandford, Miss Bush, Miss Thatcher, Miss Hill, and others ; the most con- spicuous of all, and the only one between whom and Chatterton one is able to surmise a sentimental relation, being that ' female Machiavel, Miss Rumsey,' so spitefully described in the letter to the trans- THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 27 atlantic Mr. Baker. On the whole, however, the Catcotts, Barrett, and Burgum, come most into notice. On the Rev. Mr. Catcott, Chatterton, we are to suppose, drops in occasionally, to listen to a prelection on fossils and the Deluge ; Burgum and the other Catcott he may sometimes meet at Matthew Mease's, where Catcott acts the chairman ; and from Barrett, on whom he calls at his surgery once a week or so, he receives sensible advices as to the propriety of making poetry subordinate to his profession, as well as (what he greatly prefers) the loan of medical and uncommon books. It was amid this little public of heterogeneous in- dividuals clergyman, surgeons, tradesmen, vintners, and young apprentices like himself that Chatterton produced his Rowley Poems and other antique writings. As early as the date of the Burgum pedigree, we have seen, he had ventured to bring out one antique piece, the Romaunte of the Cnychte by the so-called John de Bergham. To this had been added, as early as the commencement of 1768, the Tournament, mentioned in the letter to Baker, and perhaps other pieces. Farther, in the account of the opening of the old bridge (September 1768), references are introduced to the 'Songe of Saincte Warburgh,' and the ' Songe of Saincte 28 CHATTERTON Baldwyn,' showing that those antiques must have been then extant. In short, there is evidence that, before the conclusion of his sixteenth year, Chat- terton had produced at least a portion of his alleged antiques. But the year that followed, or from the close of 1768 to the close of 1769, seems to have been his most prolific period in this respect. In or about the winter of 1768-9 that is, when he had just completed his sixteenth year he produced, in the circle of his friends above mentioned, his ballad of The Bristowe Tragedie, his ' tragical interlude ' of ALlla, in itself a large poem, his Elinoure and Juga, a fine pastoral poem of the Wars of the Roses, and numerous other pieces of all forms and lengths in the same antique spelling. Then also did he first distinctly give the account of those pieces to which he ever afterwards adhered : to wit, that they were, for the greater part, the compositions of Thomas Rowley, a priest of Bristol of the fifteenth century, many of whose manuscripts, preserved in the muniment-room of the church of St. Mary, had come into his hands. The Catcotts were the persons most interested in the recovered manuscripts ; and, whenever Chatterton had a new poem of Rowley's on his hands, it was usually to Mr. George Catcott that he first gave a THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 29 copy of it. To Mr. Barrett, on the other hand, he usually imparted such scraps of ancient records, deeds, accounts of old churches, etc., as were likely to be of use to that gentleman in preparing his History of Bristol. So extensive, in fact, were the surgeon's obligations to the young man that he seems to have thought it impossible to requite them otherwise than by a pecuniary recompense. Accord- ingly, there is evidence of an occasional guinea or half-guinea having been transferred from the pocket of Mr. Barrett to that of Chatterton on the score of literary assistance rendered to Barrett in the pro- gress of his work. From the Catcotts, too, Chatter- ton seems, on similar grounds, to have now and then obtained something. That they were not so liberal as they might have been, however, the following bill in Chatterton's handwriting will show ' Mr. G. CATCOTT To the Executors of T. ROWLEY. To pleasure reed, in readg. his Historic works . . ^"5 5 o ,, ,, ,, his Poetic works . . ^5 5 o ;io 10 o' Whether the bill was splenetically sent to Catcott, or whether it was only drawn up by Chatterton in a cashless moment by way of frolic, is not certain ; the probability, however, is that, if it was sent, the 30 CHATTERTON pewterer did not think it necessary to discharge it. Yet he was not such a hard subject as his partner Burgum, whom Chatterton (no doubt after sufficient trial) represents as stinginess itself. But it was not only as a young man of extensive antiquarian knowledge and of decided literary talent that Chatterton was known in Bristol. As the tran- scriber of the Rowley Poems, and the editor of curious pieces of information, derived from ancient manuscripts which he was understood to have in his possession, the Catcotts, Barrett, and the rest had no fault to find with him ; but there were other phases in which he appeared, and which were not so likely to recommend him to their favour, or to the favour of such other influential persons in the com- munity as might have been disposed to patronise youthful ability. In a town of 70,000 inhabitants (which was about the population of Bristol at that time) it must be remembered that all the public characters are marked men. The mayor, the various aldermen and common councilmen, the city clergymen, the chief grocers, bankers and tradesmen, the teachers of the public schools, etc., are all recognised as they pass along the streets ; and their peculiarities, physical and moral the red nose of Alderman Such-an-one, THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 31 the wheezy voice of the Rev. Such-another, and the blustering self-importance of citizen Such-a-third, are perfectly familiar to the civic imagination. Now, it is the most natural of all things for a young man in such a town, just arrived at a tolerable con- ceit of himself, and determined to have a place some day in Mr. Craik's ' Pursuit of Knowledge under Difficulties,' to be seized with a tremendous dis- respect for everything locally sacred, and to delight in avowing the same. What nonsense they do talk in the town-council ! what a miserable set of mercantile rogues are the wealthy citizens ! what an absence of liberality and high general intelligence there is in the whole procedure of the community ! these are the common-places (often, it must be con- fessed, true enough) through which the high-spirited young native of a middle-class British town must almost necessarily pass, on his way to a higher appreciation of men and things. Through the sorrows of Lichfield, the Lichfield youth realises how it is that all creation groaneth and travaileth ; and, pinched by the inconveniences of any other town, the aspirant who is there nursed into manhood begins to snarl at things generally and to take a Byronic view ot the entire universe. Chatterton was specially liable to this discontent 32 CHATTERTON with all around him. Of a dogged, sullen and passionate disposition, not without a considerable spice of malice ; treated as a boy, yet with a brain believing itself the most powerful in Bristol ; sadly in want of pocket-money for purposes more or less questionable, and having hardly any means of pro- curing it he took his revenge out in satire against all that was respectable in Bristol. If Mr. Thomas Harris, then the Right Worshipful Mayor of the city, passed him on the pavement, either ignorant what a youth of genius he was pushing aside, or looking down somewhat askance, as a mayor will do at an attorney's apprentice that will not take off his hat at the proper moment, the thought that probably rose in his breast was, ' You are a purse-proud fool, Mr. Mayor, and I have more sense in my little finger than you have in your whole body.' If there was a civic dinner, and Chatterton was told of it, he would remark what feeding there would be among the aldermen and city brothers, what guzzling of claret, and what after-dinner speeches by fellows that could not pronounce their h's and hardly knew how to read. If he chanced to sit in church, hearing the Rev. Dr. Cutts Barton, then Dean of Bristol, preach, what would pass in his mind would be, ' You are a drowsy old rogue, Cutts, and have no more religion THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 33 in you than a sausage.' Even when Dr. Newton, the Bishop of the diocese, editor of Milton and distin- guished prelate as he was, made his appearance in the pulpit, he would not be safe from the excoria- tions of this young critic in the distant pew. Chatterton's own friends and acquaintances, too, came in for their share of his sarcasms. Lambert, we believe, he hated ; and we have seen how he could wreak a personal grudge on an old teacher. The Rev. Mr. Catcott, not a bad fellow in the main, he soon set down, in his own private opinion, as a narrow-minded parson, with no force or philosophy, conceited with his reputation at tea-parties, and a dreadful bore with his fossils and his theory of the Deluge. His brother, the unclerical Catcott, again, had probably more wit and vigour, but dogmatised insufferably over his beer; Burgum was a vain, stingy, ungrammatical goose ; and Mr. Barrett, with all his good intentions, was too fond of giving common-place advices. In short, Bristol was a vile place, where originality or genius, or even ordinary culture and intelligence, had no chance of being appreciated ; and to spend one's existence there would be but a life-long attempt to teach a certain class of animals the value and the beauty of pearls ! C 34 CHATTERTON Poor unhappy youth ! how, through the mist and din of many years past and gone since then, I seem to see thee walking, in the winter evenings of 1769-70, through the dark streets of Bristol, or out into its dark environs, ruminating such evil thoughts as these ! And what, constituting myself for the moment the mouthpiece of all that society has since pronounced on thy case, should I, leaping back over the long years to place myself by thy side, whisper to thee by way of counsel or reproach ? ' Persist ; be content ; be more modest ; think less of forbidden indulgences ; give up telling lies ; attend to your master's business ; and, if you will cherish the fire of genius, and become a poet and a man of name, like the Johnsons, the Goldsmiths, the Churchills, and others whom you think your- self born to equal or surpass, at least study patience, have faith in honourable courses, and realise, above all, that wealth and fame are vanity, and that whether you succeed or fail it will be all the same a hundred years after this.' ' Easily said,' thou wouldst answer ; ' cheaply advised ! I also could speak as you do ; if your soul were in my soul's stead, I could heap up words against you, and shake mine head at you. That the present will pass, and that a hundred years THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 35 hence all the tragedy or all the farce will have been done and over true ; I know it. Neverthe- less I know also that, minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day, the present must be moved through and exhausted ! " A hundred years after this ! " Did not Manlius the Roman know it ; and yet was there not a moment in the history of the world a moment to be fully felt and gone through by Manlius when, flung from the Tarpeian rock, he, yet living, hung half-way between his gaping executioners above and his ruddy death among the stones below ? "A hundred years after this ! " Pompeius, the Roman, knew it ; and yet was there not a moment in the history of the world a moment fully to be endured by Pompeius when, reading in the treacherous boat, he sat half-way between the ship that bore his destinies and his funeral pile on the Libyan shore? Centuries back in the past those moments now lie engulfed ; but what is that to me ? It is my turn now ; here I am, wretched in this beastly Bristol, where Savage was allowed to starve in prison ; and, by the very fact that I live, I have a right to my solicitude ! ' Obstinate boy ! is there then aught that can still, with some show of sense, be advised to you ? Seek a friend. Leave the Catcotts, lay and clerical, the 36 CHATTERTON Burgums, the Barretts, the Matthew Meases, and the rest of them, and seek some one true friend, such as surely even Bristol can supply, of about the same age as yourself, or, what were better, somewhat older. See him daily, walk with him, smoke with him, laugh with him, discuss religion with him, hear his experiences, show your poetry to him, and, above all, make a clean breast to him of your various delinquencies. Or, more efficient perhaps still, fall really in love. Avoid the Miss Rumseys, and find out some beauty of a better kind, to whom, with or without hope, you can vow the future of your noblest heart. Find her ; walk beneath her window ; catch glimpses of her ; dream of her ; if fortune favours, woo her, and (true you are but seventeen !) win her. Bristol will then be a paradise ; its sky will be lightsome, its streets beautiful, its mayor tolerable, its clergy respectable, and all its warehouses palaces ! Is this also nonsense ? Well, then, my acquaint- ance with general biography enables me to tell you of one particular family at this moment living in Bristol, with which it might be well for you to get acquainted. Mr. Barrett might be able to introduce you. The family I mean is that of the Mores, five sisters, who keep a boarding-school for young ladies THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 37 in Park Street, 'the most flourishing establishment of its kind in the west of England.' The Miss Mores, as you know, are praised by all the mothers in Bristol as extremely clever and accomplished young women ; and one of them, Miss Hannah, is, like yourself, a writer of verses, and, like yourself, destined to literary celebrity. Now, I do not wish to be mischievous ; but, seeing that posterity will wish that you two, living as you did in the same town, should at least have met and spoken with each other, might I suggest a notion to you? Could you not elope with Hannah More? True, she is seven years your senior, extremely sedate, and the very last person in the world to be guilty of any nonsense with an attorney's apprentice. Nevertheless, try. Just think of the train of con- sequences : the whole boarding-school in a flutter ; all Bristol scandalised ; paragraphs in Felix Farley's Journal; and posterity effectually cheated of two things the tragic termination of your life, and the admirable old maidenhood of hers ! Chatterton did not conceal his contempt from the very persons it was most likely to offend. Known not only as a transcriber of ancient English poetry but also as a poet in his own person, he began to 38 CHATTERTON support his reputation in the latter character by producing from time to time, along with his Rowley poems, certain compositions of his own in a modern satirical vein. In these compositions, which were written after the manner of Churchill, there was the strangest possible jumble of crude Whig politics and personal scurrility against local notabilities. What effect they were likely to have on Chatterton's position in his native town may be inferred from a specimen or two. How would Broderip, the organist, like this ? ' While Broderip's humdrum symphonies of flats Rival the harmony of midnight cats.' Or the lay Catcott this allusion to a professional feat of his in laying the topstone of a spire ? ' Catcott is very fond of talk and fame, His wish a perpetuity of name ; Which to procure, a pewter altar's made To bear his name and signify his trade, In pomp burlesqued the rising spire to head, To tell futurity a pewterer's dead.' And how would the clerical Catcott like this reference to his orthodoxy ? ' Might we not, Catcott, then infer from hence Your zeal for Scripture hath devoured your sense?' THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 39 Or what would the mayor say to this ? 'Let Harris wear his self-sufficient air, Nor dare remark, for Harris is a mayor.' Or the civic dignity of Bristol generally to this ? "Tis doubtful if her aldermen can read : This of a certainty the muse may tell None of her common-councilmen can spell. 5 Clearly enough an attorney's apprentice that was in the habit of showing about such verses was not in the way to procure patronage and goodwill. If, however, any of his friends remonstrated with him, his answer was ready ' Damn'd narrow notions, tending to disgrace The boasted reason of the human race ! Bristol may keep her prudent maxims still ; But know, my saving friends, I never will. The composition of my soul is made Too great for servile, avaricious trade, When, raving in the lunacy of ink, I catch the pen, and publish what I think.' Accordingly, Chatterton continued to support, in the eyes of the portion of the community of Bristol that knew him, a twofold character that on the one hand of an enthusiastic youth with much antiquarian know- ledge, the possessor of many antique manuscripts, chiefly poetry of the fifteenth century, and that on 40 CHATTERTON the other of an ill-conditioned boy of spiteful temper, the writer of somewhat clever but very scurrilous verses. Nay, more, it was observable that the latter character was growing upon him, apparently at the expense of the former ; for, while up to his seventeenth year (1768-9) his chief re- creation had seemed to be in his antique and Rowley MSS., after that date he seemed to throw his antiques aside, and to devote all his time to imita- tions of the satires of Churchill under such names as The Consuliad, Kew Gardens, etc. And here the reader must permit me a little Essay or Interleaf on the Character and Writings of Chatterton. ALL thinking persons have now agreed to abandon that summary method of dealing with human char- acter according to which unusual and eccentric courses of action are attributed to mere caprices on the part of the individuals concerned, mere obstinate determinations to go out of the common route. ' The dog, to gain his private ends, Went mad, and bit the man ' is a maxim less in repute than it once was. In such cases as that of Chatterton, it is now be- THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 41 lieved, deeper causes are always operating than the mere wish to deceive people and make a figure. Now, in the case of Chatterton, it appears, we must first of all take for granted an extraordinary natural precocity or prematurity of the faculties. We are aware that there is a prejudice against the use of this hypothesis. But why should it be so ? How otherwise can we represent to ourselves the cause of that diversity which we see in men than by going deeper than all that we know of pedigree, and conceiving the birth of every new soul to be, as it were, a distinct creative act of the Unseen Spirit? That now, in some Warwickshire village, the birth should be a Shakespeare, and that, again, in the poor posthumous child of a dissipated Bristol choir-singer the tiny body should be shaken by the surcharge of soul within it, are not miracles in themselves, but only variations in the great standing miracle that there should be birth at all. Nor with the idea of precocity is it necessary to associate that either of disease or of insanity. There was nothing in Chatterton to argue disease in the ordinary sense, or to indicate that, had he lived, he might not, like Pope or Tasso, who were also precocious, have gone on steadily increasing in 42 CHATTERTON ability till the attainment of a good old age. And, though it seems certain that there was a tendency to madness in the Chatterton blood Chatterton's sister, Mrs. Newton, having afterwards had an attack of insanity the use of this fact by Southey and others to explain the tenor of Chatterton's life has been too hasty and inconsiderate. On due investigation it might be found that there never was a man of genius who had not some relative in a lunatic asylum, or at least fit for one ; and, so long as we can account for Chatterton's singu- larities in any other way, there is no reason, any more than in the similar instance of Charles Lamb, why we should attribute them to what was at the utmost only a dormant taint of madness in his constitution. Assuming, then, that Chatterton, without being either a mere lusus natura or insane, was simply a child of very extraordinary endowments, we would point out, as the predominant feature in his character, his remarkable veneration for the antique. In the boyhood even of Sir Walter Scott, born as he was in the very midst of ballads and traditions, we see no manifestation of a love of the past and the historic nearly so strong as that which pos- sessed Chatterton from his infancy. The earliest THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 43 form in which this constitutional peculiarity ap- peared in him seems to have been a fondness for the ecclesiastical antiquities of his native city, and, above all, an attachment to the old Gothic Church of St. Mary Redcliffe. Some time ago we saw in a provincial Scottish newspaper an obituary notice of a poor idiot named John M'Bey, who had been for about sixty years a prominent character in the village of Huntly in Aberdeenshire. Where the poor creature had been born, no one knew ; he had been found, when apparently about ten years old, wandering among the Gartly Hills, and had been brought by some country people into the village. Here, 'supported by the kindness of several families, at whose kitchen- tables he regularly took his place at one or other of the meals of the day,' he continued to reside ever after, a conspicuous figure in the schoolboy recollections of all the inhabitants for more than half a century. The ' shaggy carroty head, the vacant stare, the idle trots and aimless walks of "Jock," could yet, 1 said the notice, 'be recalled in a moment ' by all that knew him. ' At an early period of his history,' proceeded the notice, 'he had formed a strong affection for the bell in the old ruined church of Ruthven, in the parish of 44 CHATTERTON Cairnie ; and many were the visits he paid to that object of, to him, surpassing interest. Having dubbed it with the name of " Wow" he embraced every opportunity at funerals to get a pull of the rope, interpreting the double peals, in his own significant language, to mean, " Come hame, come hame." Every funeral going to that churchyard was known to him ; and, till his old age, he was generally the first person that appeared on the ground. The emblems of his favourite bell, in bright yellow, were sewed on his garments ; and woe to the schoolboy that should utter a word in depreciation of his favourite. When near his end, he was asked how he felt. He said " he was ga'in awa' to the wow, nae to come back again." After his death, he was laid in his favourite burying-place, within sound of his cherished bell.' Do not despise this little story, reader. To our fancy it illustrates much. As this poor idiot, de- barred from all the general concerns of life, and untaught in other people's tenets, had invented a religion for himself, setting up as a central object in his own narrow circle of images an old ruined belfry, which had somehow (who knows through what horror of maternity?) caught his sense of mystery, clinging to this object with the whole THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 45 tenacity of his affections, and even devising symbols by which it might be ever present to him : so, with more complex and less rude accompani- ments, does the precocious boy of Bristol seem to have related himself to the Gothic fabric near which he first saw the light. This church was his fetich, his 'wow.' It was through it, as through a metaphorical gateway, that his imagination worked itself back into the great field of the past, so as to expatiate on the ancient condition of his native ' Brystowe ' and the whole olden time of England. This is no mere supposition. ' Chatterton/ says one of his earliest acquaintances, the Mr. William Smith above mentioned, ' was fond of walking in the ' fields, particularly in Redcliffe meadows, and of ' talking of his manuscripts, and sometimes reading ' them there. There was one spot in particular, full ' in view of the church, in which he seemed to take ' peculiar delight. He would frequently lay himself ' down, fix his eyes upon the church, and seem as ' if he were in a kind of trance ; then, on a sudden, ' he would tell me, " That steeple was burnt down ' " by lightning ; that was the place where they ' " formerly acted plays." ' To the same effect are many allusions to the church found in the Rowley poems : for example, this 46 CHATTERTON ' Thou seest this maistrie of a human hand, The pride of Bristowe and the western land.' And here we may remind the reader of a circum- stance already mentioned : namely, that the ancestors of Chatterton had for a hundred and fifty years been sextons of this same Church of St. Mary Redcliffe, and that the office had only passed out of the family on the death of his father's elder brother, John. Chatterton's father, too, it should be remembered, was a choir-singer in the church ; and Chatterton himself, while a child, had, in virtue of old family right and proximity of residence, had the run of its aisles and galleries. Can it be, we would ask the physiological philosophers, that a veneration for the edifice of St. Mary Redcliffe, and for all connected with it, had thus come down in the Chatterton blood ; that the defunct old Chattertons, Johns and Thomases in their series, who had in times gone by paced along the interior of the church, jangling its ponderous keys, brush- ing away its cobwebs, and talking with its stony effigies of knights and saints buried below, had thus acquired, in gradually increasing mass, a store of antique associations to be transmitted as a fatal heritage to the unhappy youth in whom their line was to become extinct and immortal? THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 47 One can imagine that, in part, this was the case. But Chatterton's disposition towards the antique did not remain a mere fetichistic instinct of venera- tion for the relic his ancestors had guarded. From his very boyhood he entered with all the zeal of a reader and intelligent inquirer into the service of his hereditary feeling. It would not be long, for example, before, passing from the edifice to its history, as recorded in the annals of Bristol, he would learn to pronounce, with undefinable rever- ence, the name of its founder, William Canynge, the Bristol merchant of the fifteenth century. Whatever particulars were to be gleaned from books regarding the life of this notable personage must have been familiar to Chatterton long before he ceased to be a Bluecoat scholar. How Canynge had been such a wealthy man that, according to William of Worcester, he was owner of ten vessels, and gave employment to one hundred mariners, as well as to one hundred artificers on shore ; how he had been as munificent as he was wealthy ; how he had been mayor of Bristol in 1431, and four separate times afterwards ; how he and the town had become involved in the Wars of the Roses, and how, on the accession of Edward IV., he had 48 CHATTERTON made the peace of the town by paying a fine to that monarch ; how, finally, he had become a priest in his old age, and devoted a large part of his fortune to the erection, or rather reconstruction, of the Church of St. Mary Redcliffe : all this know- ledge, easily accessible to an inquiring Bristol boy, Chatterton would collect and ponder. Chatterton, however, was not merely an inquisi- tive lad ; he was a young poet, full of enthusiasm and constructive talent. Hence, not satisfied with a meagre outline of the story of Canynge, as it could be derived from the chronicles of Bristol, he set him- to fill up the outline by conjectures and synchronisms, so as to make clear for himself Canynge's Life and Times as a luminous little spot in the general dark- ness of the English past. And here comes in the story of the old parchments. Over the north porch of St. Mary Redcliffe was a room known as 'the muniment-room.' Here, at the beginning of the eighteenth century, there lay six or seven locked chests, which were understood to contain old deeds and other writings. One of the chests was traditionally known as ' Mr. Canynge's Coffer.' The keys of this chest had been long lost ; and, when, in the year 1727, it was deemed ex- pedient to secure some title-deeds that were believed THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 49 to be contained in it, a locksmith was employed to break it open. Such documents as were thought of importance were then removed, and the rest were left in the open chest as of no value. The other chests were similarly treated. Accordingly, parcels of the remaining contents were afterwards, from time to time, carried off by various persons ; and, in particular, it was remembered that, when John Chatterton was sexton, his brother, the choir-singer and teacher of Pyle Street School, had carried off a quantity of them to be used as book-covers or for similar purposes. A bundle of these parchments remained in the posses- sion of Mrs. Chatterton after her husband's death, and such of them as had not been previously snipped into thread-papers came into Chatterton's hands. What those old documents really contained we have no means of knowing. That some of them may have been papers of historical value is not improbable. It is certain, at least, that they in- terested Chatterton, that the possession of them nourished his sense of the antique, and that he learned to decipher parts of them, catching out old bits of Latin or French phraseology, which he mis-wrote in copying. We may even go farther, and surmise that out of those papers he may have derived hints that were of use to him in his attempt D 50 CHATTERTON to represent the circumstances of Canynge's life. They may have helped him, for example, to appro- priate names for some of those fictitious or semi- fictitious personages whom he thought proper to group around Canynge in that tableau or historical romance of Bristol in the Fifteenth Century with the construction of which he regaled himself. Of these secondary dramatis persona, grouped in his imagination around Canynge, the most import- ant was a supposed priest described as Thomas Rowley, or, more fully, as ' Thomas Rowlie, parish- preeste of St. John's in the city of Bristol.' The relations between Canynge and Rowley, as bodied forth in Chatterton's conception, were as follows ; Rowley, who had been at school in Bristol with Canynge, became chaplain to Canynge's father. On that old gentleman's death, Canynge, then a rising young merchant, continued the family patronage to his schoolmate, and employed him, amongst other things, in collecting manuscripts and draw- ings for him. About the time of Canynge's first mayoralty, in 1431, Rowley was settled as parish- priest of St. John's ; and from that time forward, for a period of thirty or forty years, the two men continued on terms of the most friendly and cordial intimacy Canynge, the wealthiest man in the west THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 51 of England, and the civic soul of Bristol, living as a liberal merchant-prince in a noble residence, and Rowley, the man of books and literature, in a modest priest's habitation, made comfortable by his patron's munificence. These two men, with a few others of minor activity Carpenter, Bishop of Bristol, Sir Tibbot Gorges, a country gentleman of the neighbourhood, Sir Charles Baldwin, a brave knight of the Lancastrian faction, Iscam, another priest of Bristol, Ladgate, a monk of London, etc., etc., constituted, in fact, an enlightened little club in Chatterton's ideal Bristol of 1430-60, enlivening that city by their amateur theatricals and other relaxations from more severe business, and rendering it more distinguished for culture than any other town in England, except Oxford and London. The fine old merchant himself occasionally used his pen to some purpose; as in his epigram on the imaginary John a Dalbenie, a hot politician of the town ' John makes a jar 'bout Lancaster and York : Be still, good man, and learn to mind thy work ! ' Generally, however, he abstained from literature him- self, and preferred reading or hearing the productions of his friends Iscam and Rowley, but especially those of Rowley, who was his poet-laureate. Had Chatterton put forth this coinage of his brain 52 CHATTERTON in the shape of a professed historical romance, all would have been well. But, from working so lovingly in the matter of antiquity, he had contracted also a preference for the antique inform. As Scott, in the very process of realising the Quentin Durwards, the Mause Headriggs, and the Jedediah Cleishbothams of his fictions, acquired in his own person an antique way of thinking, and a mastery over the antique glossary, if not a positive affection for it, so it became natural to Chatterton, revelling as he did in concep- tions of the antique, to draw on an ancient-fashioned suit of thought, and make use of antique forms of language. Hence, when, prompted by his literary impulse, he sought to embody in verse any of those traditions or fictions relative to the past time of England which his enthusiasm for the antique had led him to fix upon as, for example, the story of the Danish invasions of England, the story of the Battle of Hastings, or the story of a tournament in the reign of Edward I. he found himself obliged by a kind of artistic necessity to impart a quaintness to his style by the use of old vocables and idioms. Persisted in for the mere pleasure of the exercise, the habit would become exaggerated, till at last it would amount to an ungovernable disposition to riot in the obsolete. THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 53 Even thus far, however, there was nothing blame- worthy. In thus selecting a style artificially antique for the conveyance of his historic fancies, Chatterton, it might be affirmed, had but obeyed the proper instinct of his genius, and chosen that element in which he found he could work best. Every man has his mode, or set of assumed conditions, most favourable for the production and the development of what is best in him ; and in Chatterton's case this mode, this set of conditions, consisted in an affecta- tion of the antique. For, let any one compare the Rowley Poems of Chatterton with his own acknow- ledged productions, and the conclusion will be inevitable that his forte was the antique, and that here alone lay any preternatural power he possessed. There are in his acknowledged poems, indeed, felicities of expression and gleams of genius, show- ing that even as a modern poet he might in time have taken a high rank ; but, to do justice to his astonishing abilities, one must read his antique compositions. In the element of the antique Chatterton moves like a master ; in his modern effusions he is but a clever boy beginning to handle with some effect the language of Pope and Dryden. Moreover, there is a perceptible moral difference between the two classes of his performances. In his 54 CHATTERTON antique poems there is freshness, enthusiasm, and a fine sense of the becoming ; throughout the modern ones we are offended by irreverence, malevolence, and a kind of vicious, boyish pruriency. And, con- scious as Chatterton must have been of this differ- ence, aware as he must have been that it was when he wrote in his artificially-antique style that his invention worked most powerfully, his heart beat most warmly, and the poetic shiver ran most keenly through his veins, we cannot wonder that he should have given himself up to this kind of literary recrea- tion rather than to any other. Unfortunately, however, meaner causes were all this while at work. There was maliciousness towards individuals; there was craving for notoriety ; there was delight in misleading people ; and, above all, there was want of money. Moreover, for this unhappy combination of moral states and dis- positions it so happened that the Grandfather of Lies had a very suitable temptation ready, in the shape of that most successful literary exploit, the Ossian Poems, then in the first blush of their con- tested celebrity. Yielding to the temptation, Chatterton resolved to turn what was best and most original in his genius, his enthusiasm for the antique, into the service of his worst propensities. In other THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 55 words, he resolved to adopt, with certain variations and adaptations to his own case, the trick of Mac- pherson. That this was the act of one express and distinct determination of his will a solemn and secret compact with himself, made at a very early period indeed, probably before the conclusion of his fifteenth year there can be no doubt. The elabora- tion of his scheme of imposture, however, was gradual. The first exhibition of it, and probably that which suggested much that followed, was the Burgum hoax, with its after-thought of the old English poet, John de Bergham. Of this original trick the Rowley device was but a gigantic expansion. To invent a poet of the past on whom to father all his own compositions in the antique style, and to give this poet a probable and fixed footing in history, was the essential form of the scheme. That the poet thus invented should be a native of Bristol, and that his date should be in the times of the merchant Canynge, were special accidents deter- mined by Chatterton's position and peculiar oppor- tunities. And thus the two processes of invention, the legitimate and the illegitimate, worked into each other's hands Chatterton's previous conceptions of the life and times of Canynge providing him with a proper chronological and topographical environment 56 CHATTERTON for his required poet, and his device of the poet giving richness and interest to his romance of Canynge. Once begun, there were powerful reasons why the deceit should be persevered in. There was the pleasure of the jest itself; there was the secret sense of superiority it gave him ; there was its advantage as a means of hooking half-crowns out of people's pockets ; and, last, though not least, there was the impossibility of retracting without being knocked down by Barrett for damaging his history or kicked by the Catcotts for having made fools of them. Hence, by little and little, the whole organ- isation of the imposture, from the first rumour of old manuscripts to the use of ochre, black lead, and smoke in preparing specimens of them. But Chatterton, as has been already hinted, was not a literary monomaniac, a creature of one faculty. His enthusiasm for the antique, although the most remarkable part of him, was not the whole of him. The Rowley habit of thought and expression, though he liked to put it on, was also a thing that he could at pleasure throw off. Though an antiquarian, and a midnight reader of Speght's Chaucer and other black-letter volumes, he was also an attorney's apprentice, accustomed to small flirtations, accustomed to debate and to brawl THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 57 with other attorneys' apprentices, to read the news- papers and magazines, to be present at street mobs and public meetings, and in every other way to take an apprentice's interest in the ongoings of the day. In short, besides being an antiquarian, and a creative genius in the element of the English antique, Chatterton was also, in the year 1769-70, a complete and very characteristic specimen of that long-extinct phenomenon, a brisk young Englishman of the early part of the reign of George III. In other words, reader, besides being, by the special charter of his genius, a poet in the Rowley vein, he was also, by the more general right of his life at that time, very much such a youngster as your own unmarried great-great-grandfather was. And what was that ? Why, reader, your un- married great-great-grandfather, besides wearing a wig (which Chatterton did not), a coat with lapels and flaps, knee-breeches, buckles, and a cocked hat, was also, probably, a wild young dog of a freethinker, fond of Churchill and Wilkes's ' Essay on Woman,' addicted to horrible slang against Bute and the whole Scottish nation, and raving mad about a thing he called Liberty. He read and repeated Junius, made jokes against parsons, and talked Deism and very improper doctrine on 58 CHATTERTON various social subjects. Now Chatterton, up to his capacities as a youth of seventeen, was all this. He repudiated orthodoxy, refused to be called a Christian, and held the whole clerical profession in unbounded contempt. He drew up articles of faith on a slip of paper (still to be seen in the British Museum) which he carried in his pocket ; which articles of faith were very much what Pope be- lieved before him, and what Burns, Byron, and others have believed since. In short, he was re- cognised in Bristol circles as an avowed free- thinker. His politics were to correspond. He sneered at Samuel Johnson, and thought him an old Tory bigot who had got a pension for political partisanship ; he delighted in the scandal about Bute and the King's mother ; he thought the King himself an obstinate dolt ; he denounced Grafton and the ministry to small Bristol audiences ; and he desired the nation to rally round Wilkes. One remark more is necessary at this point. As Chatterton was the dual phenomenon that we have described as he was composed of a mania for the antique, and of that general assemblage of more ordinary qualities and prejudices which con- stituted the bustling young Englishman of his era so, it appears, the latter part of his character had THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 59 begun, about his seveententh year, to gain upon him. Abandoning the antique vein, wherein he had, as it were, a native gift ready fashioned from the first, and all but independent of culture, he had begun to court his more general faculties of thought and observation, and to give himself more willingly up to that species of literature in which, equally with any other clever young man, he could hope to attain ease and perfection only by the ordinary processes of assiduity and practice. Had he lived, there was an amount of general vigour and acquisition in him that would have secured him eminence even in this field and have made him one of the conspicuous writers of the eighteenth century; but, dying as he did so early, the only bequest of real value he has left to the world is that more specific and un- accountable product of his genius, the Rowley antiques. To a provincial attorney's apprentice, full of literary aspirations, disgusted with his position in life, yet with no immediate prospect of a better, there was but one outlook of any reasonable hope or promise. It was the chance of being able, in the meantime, to form some connection with London periodicals or publishers. Accordingly, this was 60 CHATTERTON the chance which Chatterton, whose highest printed venture hitherto had been in the columns of Felix Farley's Bristol Journal, set himself to realise. His first attempt was upon Dodsley, the publisher of Pall Mall, the brother and successor in business of the more celebrated Robert Dodsley, the author of the ' Muse in Livery ' and other trifles of some note in their day, and the projector, along with Burke, of the Annual Register. The Dodsleys, it should be mentioned, had published a standard collection of ancient and modern English poetry, to which, it was understood, additions would be made in subsequent volumes. This fact, the notoriety of the Annual Register, then in the tenth year of its existence, and probably also the circum- stance, not likely to be overlooked by a young litterateur, that in that periodical there was a department for literary contributions and poetry, pointed Dodsley out to Chatterton as a likely person for his purpose. Accordingly, one morning towards the Christmas of 1768, the worthy publisher, enter- ing his shop in Pall Mall, finds among his letters one from Bristol, addressed in a neat small hand, and worded as follows ' BRISTOL, December 21, 1768 SIR, I take this method to acquaint you that I can procure copies of several ancient poems, and an interlude, perhaps the oldest dramatic piece extant, wrote by one Rowley, a priest of Bristol, who lived in the reigns of Henry vi. and Edward iv. If these pieces will be of service to you, at your command copies shall be sent to you by your most obedient servant, D. B. Please to direct to D. B., to be left with Mr. Thomas Chatterton, Redcliffe Hill, Bristol.' In reply to this, Dodsley probably sent an in- timation to the effect that he would be glad to see the poems in question, particularly the inter- lude ; for the following letter turned up long after- wards, with the foregoing, among the loose papers in Dodsley's counting-house looks as if Chatterton had at least received a reply to his note : BRISTOL, Feb. 15, 1769 SIR, Having intelligence that the tragedy of ^Ella was in being, after a long and laborious search I was so happy as to attain a sight of it. I endeavoured to obtain a copy of it to send you ; but the present possessor absolutely denies to give me one, unless I give him one guinea for a consideration. As I am unable to procure such a sum, I made a search for another copy, but unsuccess- fully. Unwilling such a beauteous piece should be lost, I have made bold to apply to you. Several gentlemen of learning who have seen it join with me in praising it. I am far from having any mercenary views for myself in the affair, and, was I able, would print it at my own risk. It is a perfect tragedy the plot clear, the language 62 CHATTERTON spirited, and the songs (interspersed in it) flowing, poetical, and elegantly simple, the similes judiciously applied, and, though wrote in the age of Henry vi., not inferior to many of the present age. If I can procure a copy, with or without the gratification, it shall be im- mediately sent to you. The motive that actuates me to do this is to convince the world that the monks (of whom some have so despicable an opinion) were not such blockheads as generally thought, and that good poetry might be wrote in the dark days of superstition, as well as in these more enlightened ages. An immediate answer will oblige. I shall not receive your favour as for myself, but as your agent. I am, sir, your most obedient servant, THOMAS CHATTERTON. P.S. My reason for concealing my name was lest my master (who is now out of town) should see my letters, and think I neglected his business. Direct for me on Redcliffe Hill. [Here followed an extract from the tragedy, as a specimen of the style.] 'The whole contains about one thousand lines. If it should not suit you, I should be obliged to you if you would calculate the expense of printing it, as I will endeavour to publish it by subscription on my own account. To Mr. JAMES DODSLEY, Bookseller, Pall Mall, London. ' This clumsy attempt to extract a guinea from the publisher (Chatterton had probably just finished his own manuscript of ^Ella, and did not like the notion of copying out so long a poem on mere THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 63 chance) very naturally failed. Mr. Dodsley did not think the speculation worth risking a guinea on ; and ' SElla, a Tragycal Enterlude, or Discoor- seynge Tragedie, wrotten by Thomas Rowllie ; plaiedd before Mastre Canynge, atte hys Howse, nempte the Rodde Lodge ' remained useless among Chatterton's papers. Chatterton was not daunted. Among the nota- bilities of the time with whose name his own excursions in the field of literature necessarily made him acquainted, there was one towards whom, for many reasons, he felt specially attracted the ingenious Horace Walpole, then a gentleman of fifty-two, leading his life of luxurious gossip and literary ease between his town house in Arling- ton Street, Piccadilly, and his country seat at Strawberry Hill, Twickenham. Known in the world of letters by his Castle of Otranto, his tragedy of The Mysterious Mother, his Catalogue of Royal and Noble Authors, and other various productions, Walpole was at that time busy in collecting ad- ditional materials for his Anecdotes of Painting in England, the publication of which he had begun in 1761. It is on this circumstance that Chatterton fastens. One evening in March 1769, Mr. Walpole, 64 CHATTERTON sitting, we will suppose, by his library fire in Arlington Street, has a packet brought him by his bookseller, Mr. Bathoe of the Strand (the first man, by-the-bye, that kept a circulating library in London). Opening the packet, he finds, first of all, the following note 'SiR, Being versed a little in antiquities, I have met with several curious manuscripts, among which the follow- ing may be of service to you in any future edition of your truly entertaining Anecdotes of Painting. In correcting the mistakes (if any) in the notes, you will greatly oblige your most humble servant, THOMAS CHATTERTON. BRISTOL, March 25 ; CORN STREET.' Appended to this short note were several pages of antique writing, entitled ' The Ryse of Peyncteyne in Englande, wroten by T. Row lie, 1469, for Mastre Canyngej and commencing as follows ; ' Peynctynge ynn England haveth of ould tyme bin yn use ; for, saieth the Roman wryters, the Brytonnes dyd de- pycte themselves, yn soundrie wyse, of the fourmes of the sonne and moone, wyth the heerbe woade : albeytte I doubte theie were no skylled carvellers.' After which introduction, the document went on to give biographical notices of certain distinguished painters that flourished in England during Saxon times and in the early Norman reigns. Attached THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 65 to the document were explanatory notes in Chatter- ton's own name. One of these notes informed Walpole who Rowley, the reputed author of the MS., was : ' His merit as a biographer and historiographer is ' great ; as a poet still greater : some of his pieces ' would do honour to Pope ; and the person under ' whose patronage they may appear to the world ' will lay the Englishman, the antiquary, and the ' poet, under eternal obligation.' Another note per- formed a like biographical office for Canynge, that ' Maecenas of his time ' ; and a third conveyed the information that one John, the second Abbot of St. Austin's in Bristol, mentioned in the text as ' the fyrste Englyshe paynstere in oyles,' was also the greatest poet of his age (A.D. 1186), and gave, as a specimen of his poetry, three stanzas on Richard I. Finally, Chatterton offered to put Walpole in pos- session of still other particulars from the same source. Whether from the suddenness and naivete of the attack, or from the stupefying effects of the warm air of his library on a March evening, Walpole was completely taken in. He can hardly have glanced over the whole letter when, really interested by its contents, he took his pen and wrote the following reply E 66 CHATTERTON ARLINGTON ST., March 28, 1769. 'SiR I cannot but think myself singularly obliged by a gentleman with whom I have not the pleasure of being acquainted, when I read your very curious and kind letter, which I have this minute received. I give you a thousand thanks for it, and for the very obliging offer you make of communicating your manuscript to me. What you have already sent me is valuable, and full of information ; but, instead of correcting you, sir, you are far more able to correct me. I have not the happiness of understanding the Saxon language, and, without your learned notes, should not have been able to comprehend Rowley's text. ' As a second edition of my Anecdotes was published last year, I must not flatter myself that a third will be wanted soon ; but I shall be happy to lay up any notices you will be so good as to extract for me and send me at your leisure ; for, as it is uncertain when I may use them, I would by no means borrow or detain your MSS. ' Give me leave to ask you where Rowley's poems are to be found. I should not be sorry to print them, or at least a specimen of them, if they have never been printed. ' The Abbot John's verses that you have given me are wonderful for their harmony and spirit, though there are some words that I do not understand. You do not point out exactly the time when he lived ; which I wish to know, as I suppose it was long before John van Eyck's discovery of oil-painting : if so, it confirms what I have guessed and hinted in my Anecdotes, that oil-painting was known here much earlier than that discovery or revival. ' I will not trouble you with more questions now, Sir ; but flatter myself, from the urbanity and politeness you have already shown me, that you will give me leave to consult you. I hope, too, you will forgive the simplicity THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 67 of my direction, as you have favoured me with none other. ' I am, sir, your much obliged and obedient servant, ' HORACE WALPOLE. 'P.S. Be so good as to direct to Mr. Walpole, Arlington Street.' Chatterton was highly elated. He had received a letter from the great Horace Walpole, written as from an equal to an equal ! How differently men of that stamp treated one from the Catcotts, the Barretts, and other local persons ! In haste to acknowledge such politeness, he sends off a supple- mentary Historic of Peyncters yn England bie T. Rowlie, containing sketches of two new poets, Ecca, a Saxon bishop of the year 557, and Elman, a Saxon bishop of the same epoch, with specimens of their verses translated from the original Saxon by Rowley. He adds some more verses of the Abbot John's, and promises a com- plete transcript of Rowley's works as soon as he shall have had time to make one. At the same time he gives Walpole a confidential account of himself and his prospects. This part of the letter is lost ; but Walpole thus states his recollections of its tenor ; ' He informed me that he was the son of a poor widow, who supported him with great difficulty ; that he was a clerk or apprentice to 68 CHATTERTON an attorney, but had a taste and turn for more elegant studies ; and hinted a wish that I would assist him with my interest in emerging out of so dull a profession by procuring him some place in which he could pursue his natural bent.' Clearly Chatterton was never so near telling the whole truth as when, touched by Walpole's polite- ness, he thus addressed him as his only available friend. One is sorry that he did not try the effect of a full confession. Had Walpole received a letter from his unknown correspondent conveying, in addition to the foregoing particulars, this farther acknowledgment, that what he had sent to him, Mr. Walpole, was not a real extract from a MS., but a forgery ; that for more than a year he had been palming off similar forgeries on various persons in Bristol, but that now he was heartily tired of the mystification and would fain be out of it ; and that, if Mr. Walpole, with such specimens before him of the writer's powers as those pretended antiques afforded, should be disposed to add the kindness of his practical assistance to that of his forgiveness for the trick attempted on him, he would thereby earn the writer's lasting gratitude, and save a life not wholly irretrievable ; one wonders greatly what, in such THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 69 circumstances, Horace Walpole would have done. Would the reflection in the library in Arlington Street have been ' The impudent young scoundrel ! I will write to his master ' ; or would it have been ' Poor young fellow ! he throws himself upon me, and I must do something for him ' ? Unfortunately, Chatterton did not put it in Wai- pole's option whether he would be thus generous. He left the virtuoso to discover the fact of the imposture for himself. Nor was it difficult to do so. On the very second reading of the communication to which, in a moment of credulity, he had returned so polite a reply, Walpole, sufficiently alive, one would think, to the possibility of a literary trick (his own Castle of Otranto had been published as a pre- tended translation from a black-letter book printed at Naples in 1529. and he had but recently been implicated in the Ossian business), must have begun to suspect that all was not right. A series of Anglo- Saxon painters till then unheard of ; a new poet of the twelfth century writing a poem on Richard I. in perfectly modern metre; and a new poet of the fifteenth advertised as having left numerous poems and other writings still extant in Bristol : all this in one letter was too much ; and little wonder if, as he afterwards said, his reflection was that ' somebody, 70 CHATTERTON having met his Anecdotes of Painting, had a mind to laugh at him.' But, when the second letter came, bringing with it a batch of new painters, and specimens of two Saxon poets of the sixth century, and when in this letter the writer explained that he was a poor widow's son with a turn for literature, there could be no longer any doubt in the matter. His friends Gray and Mason, to whom he showed the documents, concurred with him in thinking them forgeries, and 'recommended the returning them without farther notice.' But Walpole, with an amount of good-nature for which he does not get credit, did not act so summarily. He took the trouble, he says, to write to a relation of his, an old lady residing at Bath, desiring her to make inquiries about Chatterton. The reply was a confirmation of Chatterton's story about himself, but 'nothing was returned about his character.' In these circum- stances, Walpole discharged the whole matter from his mind thus ' Being satisfied with my intelligence about Chatterton, I wrote him a letter with as much kindness and tenderness as if I had been his guardian ; for, though I had no doubt of his impositions, such a spirit of poetry breathed in his coinage as interested me for him ; nor was it a grave crime in a young bard to have forged false notes of hand that were to pass current only in the parish of Parnassus. I THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 71 undeceived him about my being a person of any interest, and urged to him that, in duty and gratitude to his mother, who had straitened herself to breed him up to a profession, he ought to labour in it, that in her old age he might absolve his filial debt ; and I told him that, when he should have made his fortune, he might unbend himself with the studies consonant to his inclinations. I told him also that I had communicated his transcripts to much better judges, and that they were by no means satisfied with the authenticity of his supposed MSS.' In fancying the impatient ' Bah, old gentleman ! don't I know all that myself?' with which the dis- appointed boy, reading this letter, must have received its advice, the question is apt to recur to us, How is it that, with such evidence before their eyes of the uselessness of advice, people are so stupid as to persist in giving it? But the remark of a late eminent statistician comes to mind. 'Advice,' said he, ' probably saves a percentage.' And certainly this puts the matter on its right basis. Chatterton sent two letters in reply to that of Walpole. In the first, the tone of which is some- what downcast, he professes himself unable to dispute with a person of such literary distinction respecting the age of a MS., thanks him for his advice, and expresses his resolution to follow it. ' Though I am but sixteen years old,' he says, ' I have lived long enough to see that poverty attends 72 CHATTERTON literature.' The second letter, which is dated April I4th, is more abrupt. Here he expresses his convic- tion that the papers of Rowley are genuine, and requests Walpole, unless he should be inclined to publish the transcripts, to return them, as he wishes to give them to ' Mr. Barrett, an able antiquary, now writing the History of Bristol] and has no other copy. When this second note reached Arlington Street, Walpole was on the eve of a journey to Paris ; and, in the hurry, the request to return the MSS. was not attended to. Again Chatterton wrote ; but, as the virtuoso was absent, he received no answer. It was not till after six weeks that Walpole returned to London ; and then so insignificant a matter was not likely to be remembered. Towards the close of July, however, and when he had been again in town five or six weeks, he was reminded of his Bristol correspondent by the receipt of what he thought ' a singularly impertinent note' 'SiR, I cannot reconcile your behaviour to me with the notions I once entertained of you. I think myself injured, sir ; and, did you not know my circumstances, you would not dare to treat me thus. I have sent twice for a copy of the MSS. ; no answer from you. An explanation or excuse for your silence would oblige ' THOMAS CHATTERTON. 'July 24.' THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 73 Walpole's conduct on the receipt of this note we will let himself relate : 1 My heart did not accuse me of insolence to him. I wrote an answer expostulating with him on his injustice, and renewing good advice; but, upon second thoughts, reflecting that so wrong-headed a young man, of whom I knew nothing, and whom I had never seen, might be absurd enough to print my letter, I flung it into the fire ; and, snapping up both his poems and letters, without taking a copy of either (for which I am now sorry), I returned both to him, and thought no more of him or them.' Thus ended the correspondence between Walpole and Chatterton, Walpole soon forgetting the whole affair, and Chatterton persisting in his belief that, had he not committed the blunder of letting his aristocratic correspondent know that he was a poor widow's son, he would have fared better at his hands. No doubt there was something in this. But, of all the unreasonable things ever done by a misjudging public, certainly that of condemning Walpole to infamy for his conduct in this affair and charging on him all the tragic sequel of Chatterton's life is one of the most unreasonable. Why, the probability is that Walpole behaved better than most people would have done in the circumstances ! Let any one in the present day fancy how he would act 74 CHATTERTON if some one utterly unknown to him were to try to impose on him in a similar way through the post- office. Would the mere cleverness of the cheat take away the instinctive frown of resentment, and change it into admiring enthusiasm ? That there may possibly have been in London at that time persons of rare goodness, of overflowing tolerance and com- passion, that would have acted differently from the virtuoso of Arlington Street persons who, saying to themselves, ' Here is a poor young man of abilities in a bad way/ would have immediately called for their carpet bags, and set off for Bristol by coach, to dig out the culprit, and lecture him soundly, and make a man of him we will not deny. If that time was like the present, however, such men, we fear, must have been very thinly scattered, and very hard to find. Looking back now, we must, of course, feel that it was a pity the correspondence did not lead to a better issue ; and Walpole himself lived to know this. But, as Burke has said, 'Men are wise with little reflection, and good with little self-denial, in the business of all times except their own.' Let, therefore, such as are disposed to blame Walpole in this affair lay the whole story to heart in the form of a maxim for their own guidance. THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 75 While the correspondence with Walpole had been going on, Chatterton had not been idle. In the month of January 1769 there appeared in London the first number of a new periodical, called the Town and Country Magazine. It was somewhat on the model of the Gentleman's Magazine, and of those other curious monthly collections of scraps with which our ancestors, strangers to the more elaborate entertain- ment of modern periodicals, used to regale their leisure. Here was an opportunity for the young litterateur of Bristol. Accordingly, in the February number (magazines were then published retrospec- tively, i.e., at the close of the month whose name they bore) there appeared two contributions from the pen of Chatterton : one a prose account of the costume of Saxon heralds, signed ' D.B.' ; the other a little complimentary poem addressed to ' Mr Alcock, the miniature painter of Bristol,' and signed ' Asaphides.' Over these signatures he continued to contribute to the magazine ; and effusions of his, chiefly Ossianic prose-poems, purporting to be from the Saxon or the ancient British, appeared in all the subsequent numbers for the year 1769, except those of June, September, and October. In the number for May appeared one of the finest of his minor Rowley poems. In short, at the publishing office 76 CHATTERTON of the Town and Country in London the hand- writing of ' D. B.' of Bristol must have been recog- nised, in 1769, as that of one of the established correspondents of the magazine ; and in Bristol it must have been a fact known and enviously com- mented on among the Carys, the Smiths, the Kators, and other young men of Chatterton's acquaintance, that he could have his pieces printed as often he liked in a London periodical. Chatterton felt the immensity of the honour; and there is extant a somewhat unveracious letter of his to a distant relative, ' a breeches-maker in Salisbury,' in which he brags of it He tells the breeches-maker at the same time of his correspondence with Walpole. ' It ended,' he says, 'as most such do. I differed ' from him in the age of a MS. ; he insists upon ' his superior talents, which is no proof of that ' superiority. We possibly may engage publicly in ' some one of the periodical publications, though I ' know not who will give the onset.' The Town and Country Magazine seems to have been the only metropolitan print to which Chatterton was a contributor during the year 1769. But in the beginning of 1770 he succeeded in another venture, and became the correspondent also of a London newspaper. THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 77 The newspapers of that day were by no means such as we now see. The largest of them consisted of but a single sheet, corresponding in size with our small evening papers. Their contents, too, were neither so various nor so elaborately prepared as those of our present newspapers. Advertisements, paragraphs of political gossip picked up outside the Houses of Parliament, and scraps of miscellaneous town, country, and foreign news, constituted nearly all that the newspaper then offered to its readers. What we now call ' leading articles ' were hardly known. It was enough for even a metropolitan journal to have one editorial hand to assist the publisher ; and the notion of employing a staff of educated men to write comments on the proceedings of the day was but in its infancy. The place, however, of leading articles by paid attaches of the newspaper was in part supplied by the voluntary letters of numerous anonymous correspondents, interested in politics, and glad to see their lucubra- tions in print. Men of political note sometimes took this mode of serving the ends of their party ; but the majority of the correspondents of news- papers were literary clients of official men, or private individuals scattered up and down the country. Chief of these unpaid journalists, king among the 78 CHATTERTON numberless Brutuses, Publicolas, and Catos, that told the nation its grievances through the columns of the newspapers, was the terrible Junius of the Public Advertiser. The boldest of his letters was perhaps that containing his ' Address to the King,' which was published on the iQth December, 1769. The excitement that followed this letter, and above all the report that the publisher, Mr. H. J. Woodfall, was to be brought to account for it before the public tribunals, produced a crisis some called it a panic, some a jubilee in the newspaper world. The other newspapers were, of course, anxious to obtain a share of the renown which the threatened prosecution conferred on the Public Advertiser. Ac- cordingly, to reassure its correspondents, and to convince its subscribers of its unflinching liberalism in the midst of danger, the Middlesex Journal, a bi-weekly newspaper of the day, not far behind the Advertiser in credit, hastened to put forth the following manifesto 'William George Edmunds, of Shoe Lane, in the parish of St. Andrew's, Holborn, Gent, maketh oath and saith, that he will not at any time declare the name of any person or persons who shall send any papers to the Middlesex Journal or Chronicle of Liberty, or any other publication in which he shall be concerned, without the express consent and direction of the author of such paper; and that he THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 79 will not make any discovery by which any of his authors can be found out ; and that he will give to the public, in the fairest and fullest manner, all such essays, dissertations and other writings, without any alteration, so far as he can or ought, consistently with the duty of an honest man, a good member of society, a friend to his country, and a loyal subject. W. G. EDMUNDS. 'Sworn at the Mansion House, London January ist, 1770, before me, W. BECKFORD, Mayor.' 'N.B. Mr. E. makes it a general rule to destroy all MSS. as soon as they are composed for the press. If any gentleman, however, is desirous of having his MSS. re- turned to him, Mr. E. begs that the words "to be returned," may be in large letters at the end of the originals. In that case they shall be preserved and delivered up to any person who shall bring an order for that purpose in the same handwriting as the original.' As this manifesto of Mr. Edmunds, copied by us from the Middlesex Journal for February 6th 1770, was repeated in succeeding numbers, it probably caught Chatterton's eye in Bristol, and determined his already cherished intention of trying his hand at a newspaper article. At all events, he plunged at once in medias res. There had just been a change of Ministry. The Duke of Grafton, the favourite victim of Junius, had resigned and given place, for some secret Court reason, to the goggle-eyed Lord North. Chatterton, hearing much talk about this affair, 8o CHATTERTON thinks it a good topic for his purpose, and, stealing a forenoon from his office-work, pens, in a style mimicked after that of Junius, a ' Letter to the Duke of G n/ in which he informs that illus- trious personage that his resignation has ' caused more speculation than any harlequinade he has already acted/ and tells him that, as he had been all along the tool of Bute, to whom he was at first recommended by his 'happy vacuity of in- vention,' so now it is Bute's influence that has dismissed him. This missive he dates 'Bristol, February 16,' and signs ' Decimus.' Mr. Edmunds, receiving it in his sanctum in Shoe Lane, glances over it, thinks it tolerably smart, and prints it. Whether the Duke of Grafton ever saw it, poor man, we do not know. If he did, ' One wasp more ' would be his very natural reflection ; and he would go on sipping his chocolate. Chatterton's next contribution to the Middlesex Journal, or at least the next that Mr. Edmunds thought proper to print, was one with the same signature, dated ' Bristol, April 10, 1770,' and addressed to that much abused lady, the Princess Dowager of Wales, the mother, and, as people said, manager of the king. Here is a specimen Junius, it will be observed, to the very cadence : THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 81 'By you, men of no principles were thrust into offices they did not know how to discharge, and honoured with trusts they accepted only to violate ; being made more conspicuously mean by communicating error and often vice to the character of the person who promoted them. None but a sovereign power can make little villains dangerous ; the nobly vicious, the daringly ambitious, only rise from themselves. Without the influence of ministerial authority, Mansfield had been a pettifogging attorney, and Warburton a bustling country curate. The first had not lived to bury the substance of our laws in the shadows of his explanations ; nor would the latter have confounded religion with deism, and proved of no use to either. . . . The state of affairs very much resembles the eve of the troubles of Charles i. Unhappy monarch, thou hast a claim, a dear-bought claim, to our pity ; nothing but thy death could purchase it. Hadst thou died quietly and in peace, thou hadst died infamous ; thy misfortunes were the only happy means of saving thee from the book of shame. What a parallel could the freedom of an English pen strike out ! ' This letter was written on a Tuesday. On the Saturday, or, more probably, on the Monday following, there was a tremendous incident. Chatterton, among his other eccentricities, had often been heard to talk familiarly of suicide. One evening, for example, pulling out a pistol in the presence of some of his companions, he had placed it to his forehead, saying ' Now, if one had but courage to draw the trigger ! ' Nor was this F 82 CHATTERTON mere juvenile affectation. Hateful from the first, Chatterton's position in Bristol had by this time be- come unendurable to him. All his literary honours, his contributorship to a London magazine and his correspondence with a London newspaper now in- cluded, were as nothing when put in the balance against his present servitude. If there were seasons when, sanguine in his hopes of a better future, he was able to keep his disgust within bounds, there were others when it rose to a perfect frenzy. Such a season seems to have been the week in which the foregoing letter was written for the Middlesex Journal. By some pressure of circum- stances Chatterton was that week reduced to the necessity of asking Burgum for a loan of money ; which Burgum, at the last moment, refused. Chatterton has thus perpetuated the fact ' When wildly squandering everything I got On books and learning, and the Lord knows what, Could Burgum then my critic, patron, friend Without security attempt to lend ? No, that would be imprudent in the man : Accuse him of imprudence if you can ! ' This disappointment throws him into a humour bordering on the suicidal ; and, left alone in his master's office on the Saturday forenoon following, he displays it by penning a kind of satirical will THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 83 or suicide's farewell to the world. This extra- ordinary document, which is still extant, is headed thus ' All this wrote between 1 1 and 2 o'clock, Saturday, in the utmost distress of mind, April 14, 1770' ; and, after some fifty lines of verse addressed to Burgum, the Rev. Mr. Catcott, and Barrett, it proceeds as follows 'This is the last Will and Testament of me, Thomas Chatterton, of the city Bristol, being sound in body, or it is the fault of my last surgeon : the soundness of my mind the coroners are to be judges of desiring them to take notice that the most perfect masters of human nature in Bristol distinguish me by the title of ' the mad genius ' ; therefore, if I do a mad action, it is conformable to every action of my life, which all savoured of insanity. ' Item. If, after my death, which will happen to-morrow night before eight o'clock, being the Feast of the Resurrec- tion, the coroner and jury bring it in lunacy, I will and direct that Paul Farr, Esq., and Mr. John Flower, at their joint expense, cause my body to be interred in the tomb of my fathers, and raise the monument over my body to the height of four feet five inches, placing the present flat stone on the top, and adding six tablets.' [Here follow directions for certain engravings to be placed on the six tablets : viz., on two of them, fronting each other, certain heraldic achievements ; on another, an inscription, in old English characters, to his ancestor, Guatevine Chatterton, A.D, 1210; on another, an inscrip- tion, in the same character, to another ancestor, Alanus Chatterton, A.D. 1415 ; on another an inscription, in 84 CHATTERTON Roman letters, to the memory of his father; and on the remaining one this epitaph to himself 'TO THE MEMORY OF 'THOMAS CHATTERTON ' Reader, judge not. If thou art a Christian, believe ' that he shall be judged by a supreme power : to that ' power alone is he now answerable.'] 'And I will and direct that, if the coroner's inquest bring it in felo de se, the said monument shall be, notwith- standing, erected. And, if the said Paul Farr and John Flower have souls so Bristolish as to refuse this my request, they will transmit a copy of my will to the Society for supporting the Bill of Rights, whom I hereby empower to build the said monument according to the aforesaid direc- tions. And, if they, the said Paul Farr and John Flower, should build the said monument, I will and direct that the second edition of my Kew Gardens shall be dedicated to them in the following dedication : " To Paul Farr and John Flower, Esqrs., this book is most humbly dedicated by the Author's Ghost." 'Item, I give all my vigour and fire of youth to Mr. George Catcott, being sensible he is most in want of it. ' Item. From the same charitable motive, I give and bequeath unto the Rev. Mr. Camplin, sen., all my humility. To Mr. Burgum all my prosody and grammar, likewise one moiety of my modesty ; the other moiety to any young lady who can prove, without blushing, that she wants that valu- able commodity. To Bristol all my spirit and disinterest- edness, parcels of goods unknown on her quays since the days of Canning and Rowley. ('Tis true, a charitable gentleman, one Mr. Colston, smuggled a considerable quantity of it ; but, it being proved that he was a Papist, the worshipful society of aldermen endeavoured to throttle THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 85 him with the oath- of allegiance.) I leave also my religion to Dr. Cutts Barton, Dean of Bristol, hereby empowering the sub-sacrist to strike him on the head when he goes to sleep in church. My powers of utterance I give to the Rev. Mr. Broughton, hoping he will employ them to a better purpose than reading lectures on the immortality of the soul. I leave the Rev. Mr. Catcott some little of my free-thinking, that he may put on spectacles of reason, and see how vilely he is duped in believing the Scriptures literally. (I wish he and his brother George would know how far I am their real enemy : but I have an unlucky way of raillery ; and, when the strong fit of satire is upon me, I spare neither friend nor foe. This is my excuse for what I have said of them elsewhere.) I leave Mr. Clay- field the sincerest thanks my gratitude can give; and I will and direct that, whatever any person may think the pleasure of reading my works worth, they immediately pay their own valuation to him, since it is then become a lawful debt to me, and to him as my executor in this case. ' I leave my moderation to the politicians on both sides of the question. I leave my generosity to our present right worshipful mayor, Thomas Harris, Esq. I give my abstinence to the company at the Sheriffs' annual feast in general, more particularly the aldermen. ' Item. I give and bequeath to Mr. Matthew Mease a mourning ring with this motto, "Alas, poor Chatterton!" provided he pays for it himself. Item. I leave the young ladies all the letters they have had from me, assuring them that they need be under no apprehensions from the appear- ance of my ghost, for I die for none of them. Item. I leave all my debts, the whole not five pounds, to the payment of the charitable and generous Chamber of Bristol, on penalty, if refused, to hinder every member from a good dinner by appearing in the form of a bailiff. If, in defiance 86 CHATTERTON of this terrible spectre, they obstinately persist in refusing to discharge my debts, let my two creditors apply to the supporters of the Bill of Rights. Item. I leave my mother and sister to the protection of my friends, if I have any. ' Executed in the presence of Omniscience, this i4th of April, 1770. ' THOMAS CHATTERTON.' Whether this dreadful document got immediately abroad among Chatterton's friends does not appear. Another document, however, written at the same time and in the same mad mood, was sufficiently alarming to produce a catastrophe. The Mr. Clay- field mentioned with such peculiar respect in the preceding paper, a distiller of means and respect- ability, and a friend of Mr. Lambert's, seems to have been a person of more than usual consideration in the eyes of Mr. Lambert's apprentice. To him, accordingly, rather than to any other person in Bristol, he chose to indite a letter conveying his intention of suicide. This letter not actually sent to Mr. Clayfield by Chatterton, but inadvertently left about, it would appear, with that gentleman's address upon it was prematurely delivered to him. Startled by its contents, he lost no time in communi- cating them to Mr. Lambert. There was an im- mediate consultation among Chatterton's friends, and Mr. Barrett undertook to see the infatuated lad, and THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 87 reason with him on the folly and criminality of his conduct Accordingly, a long conversation took place between them, in which, to use his own words, he took Chatterton to task for the ' bad company and principles he had adopted,' and lectured him seri- ously ' on the horrible crime of self-murder, however glossed over by present libertines.' Chatterton was affected, and shed tears. The next day, however, he sent Mr. Barrett the following letter, the original of which may be seen in the British Museum 'SiR Upon recollection I don't know how Mr. Clay- field could come by his letter, as I intended to give him a letter, but did not. In regard to my motives for the supposed rashness, I shall observe that I keep no worse company than myself: I never drink to excess, and have, without vanity, too much sense to be attached to the mercenary retailers of iniquity. No, it is my PRIDE, my damn'd native unconquerable PRIDE, that plunges me into distraction. You must know that nineteen-twentieths of my composition is pride. I must either live a slave, a servant, to have no will of my own which I may freely declare as such, or DIE. Perplexing alternative ! but it distracts me to think of it ! I will endeavour to learn humility, but it cannot be here. What it may cost me in the trial Heaven knows. ' I am your much obliged unhappy humble servant, ' Thursday Evening. T. C.' Before this letter had been written by Chatterton, one thing had been fully determined with regard to 88 CHATTERTON him. Mr. Lambert was no longer to keep him in his service. Even had the lawyer himself been willing to make the attempt, the lawyer's mother, who kept house for him an old lady between whom and Chatterton, there had never, we have reason to think, been any cordiality would certainly not have listened to such a thing. What ! sleep under the same roof with a violent young fellow that had threatened to make away with himself? Find the garret in a welter some morning with the young rascal's blood, and have a coroner's inquest in the house ? Better at once give him up his indentures, and be rid of him ! With this advice of the old lady even the calmer deliberations of Chatterton's own friends, Barrett, Catcott and the rest, could not but agree. So, on or about Monday the i6th of April 1770, it was intimated to Chatterton that he was no longer in the employment of Mr. Lambert. Tuesday the i/th, it will be remembered, was the day of Wilkes's release from prison; and on Thursday the iQth the very day, as we guess, on which the foregoing letter to Mr. Barrett was written there took place in Bristol that dinner in honour of the patriot at which, according to the announcement in the Public Advertiser, the more prominent Liberals of the town were to assemble at ' the Crown, in the THE ATTORNEY'S APPRENTICE 89 passage from Broad Street to Tower Lane,' to eat their forty-five pounds of meat, drink their forty-five tankards of ale and their forty-five bowls of punch, and smoke their forty-five pipes of tobacco. Were we wrong in fancying that, while those Bristol Wilkesites were making merry in the tavern, Chatterton may have been moodily perambulating the adjacent streets ? Shall we be wrong if we fancy, farther, that the story of Mr. Lambert's apprentice and his intended suicide may have been talked over by the happy gentlemen, when, having finished their toasts, they sat down at leisure to their pipes and the remaining punch ? CHAPTER III BOUND FOR LONDON CAST out of all chance of a livelihood in his native town, there was but one course open to Chatterton : to bid farewell to Bristol and attorneyship, and try what he could do in the great literary mart of London. Sanguine as were his hopes of success, it can have cost him but little thought to make up his mind to this course, if indeed he did not secretly congratulate himself that his recent escapade had ended so agreeably. Probably there was but one thing that stood in the way of an immediate de- claration by himself, after the fracas was over, that this was the resolution he had come to the want, namely, of a little money to serve for outfit. No sooner, therefore, was this obstacle removed by the charitable determination of his friends, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Clayfield, the Catcotts, etc., to make a little subscription for him, so as to present him with the parting gift of a few pounds, than the tide of BOUND FOR LONDON 91 feeling was turned, and from a state of despondency Chatterton gave way to raptures of unbounded joy. London ! London ! A few days, and he should have left the dingy quays of abominable Bristol, and should be treading, in the very footsteps of Goldsmith, Garrick, and Johnson, the liberal London streets ! Chatterton remained exactly a week in Bristol after his dismissal from Mr. Lambert's : i.e. from the 1 6th to the 24th of April. A busy week we may suppose that to have been for Mrs. Chatterton and her daughter ; so much sewing to be done, so many other little preparations to be made for the poor boy's departure. This dreadful occurrence notwithstanding, and all that idle people are saying about it, do not they know him better than anybody else does, and may he not yet, they say to each other, make his way in the world as creditably as any of the best in Bristol ? So, in their humble apartments, the widow and her daughter ply their needles, talking of Thomas and his prospects as hopefully as they can. The subject of their conversation, meanwhile, is generally out, going from street to street, and taking leave of his friends. Barrett, the two Catcotts, Mr. Alcock, Mr. Clayfield, Burgum, Matthew Mease, 92 CHATTERTON and his younger friends, the Carys, Smiths, and Kators he makes the round of them all, receiving their good wishes, and making arrangements to correspond with them. To less intimate acquaint- ances, too, met accidentally in the streets, he has to bid a friendly good-bye. Moreover, there are his numerous feminine friends the Miss Webbs, the Miss Thatchers, the Miss Hills, etc., not to omit that ' female Machiavel,' Miss Rumsey who have all heard, with more or less concern, that they are about to lose their poet, and are, of course, anxious to see him before he goes. Of some acquaintances of this class, probably the more humble of them, he appears to have taken a kind of collective fare- well. Long afterwards, at least, a Mrs. Stephens, the wife of a cabinet-maker in Bristol, used to tell that she remembered, as an incident of her girl- hood, Chatterton's 'taking leave of her and some others, on the steps of Redcliffe Church, very cheer- fully,' before his going to London. 'At parting, he said he would give them some gingerbread, and went over the way to Mr. Freeling's to buy some.' In connection with which little anecdote we have a mysterious little scrap of document to produce. It has to be prefaced, however, by a remark or two, BOUND FOR LONDON 93 A great deal of nonsense has been written on the question of Chatterton's moral character. Natur- ally resenting the harsh way in which Chalmers and other earlier biographers of Chatterton handled his memory, the writers of some more recent notices have certainly made out, in favour of ' the marvellous boy,' a certificate of good behaviour to which he was not entitled, and for which he would not have thanked them. The evidence on which they have laid most stress in this connection is that of Chatterton's sister, as given by her in her letter to the Rev. Sir Herbert Croft, eight years after Chatterton's death, and published by that gentleman in his singular book, Love and Madness. The following is a passage from that touching and simple epistle, spelt as in the original : ' He wrote one letter to Sir Horace Warlpool ; and, except his corrispondence with Miss Rumsey, the girl I have mentioned, I know of no other. He would frequently walk the Colledge Green with the young girls that statedly paraded there to shew their finery. But I realy beleive he was no debauchee (tho some have reported it), the dear unhappy boy had faults enough I saw with concern. he was proud and ex- ceedingly impetious, but that of venality [the writer thought this a fine word for what she meant] he could not be justly accused with. Mrs. Lambert informed me, not 2 months before he left Bristol, he had never 94 CHATTERTON been once found out of the office in the stated hours, as they frequently sent the footman and other servants to see Nor but once stayed out till 1 1 o'clock : then he had leave, as we entertained some friends at our house at Christmas.' This very distinct piece of evidence in favour of Chatterton's punctual conduct as an apprentice has been strained into a testimony of much wider signi- ficance. A fruitless attempt, we fear ! The worth of a sister's assurance that her deceased brother could not be justly accused of ' venality ' it is not difficult to estimate ; besides which, it is accompanied with the information that the common report was to the con- trary, and with the allusion to the habit of ' walking with the girls on the College Green,' whatever that may mean. Then, again, we have the fact that Mr. Barrett, in his remonstrance with him respecting his alarming letter to Mr. Clayfield, attributed his bad state of mind to the influence of bad company. His own allusions, too, scattered through his writings, seem quite decisive, even if we should not take into very special account the almost constant tone which runs through all that portion of his writings that is not in the antique vein, evidently the productions, as most of those modern pieces are, of a clever boy eager (as boys often are till some real experience of BOUND FOR LONDON 95 the heart has made them earnest and silent) to assert his manhood among his compeers by the irreverent freedom of his language. And, after all, have we not the native probabilities of the case itself? Are young men in general, and attorneys' apprentices in particular, usually so immaculate in conduct that it becomes necessary to argue out something like a perfectly virtuous character for Chatterton before venturing to introduce him to the admirers of genius and literature? Should we fail in doing this, will Byron, Burns, and the rest, refuse to shake hands with him? It is a pity, certainly, that one should have to ask such a question. Young men of genius may take warning. A convenient theory of ' wild oats ' has been provided and put in circulation for their use by the thoughtless and the interested ; but better for themselves in the end if they decidedly reject it. Were Byron and Burns, or were Chatterton himself, to speak now, this would be their advice. Happiest is he who, needing no benefit from the theory, yet can weigh it, and temper his judgments with charity. And now for our document. If the reader were to go to the Reading- Room of the British Museum and ask for the Chatterton MSS. (a considerable portion of all the surviving MSS. of Chatterton is in the 96 CHATTERTON Museum, the remainder being in Bristol and else- where), he would have several volumes brought to him, containing papers and parchments of various shapes and sizes, some stained, smoked, and written like antiques, others undisguisedly modern. If, after overcoming the strange feeling that here in his hands are the very sheets over which so many years ago Chatterton bent, tracing with nimble fingers the black characters over the white pages, the reader should examine the papers successively and indi- vidually, he would come upon one that would puzzle him much. It is a dingy piece of letter-paper, once folded as a letter, and containing a very ugly scrawl in an uneducated feminine hand. Here it is, printed as in the original ' Sir, I send my Love to you and Tell you This if you prove Constant I not miss but if you frown and Torn away I can make oart of battered Hay pray excep of me Love Hartley an send me word Cartingley. Tell me How maney ouncs of Green Gingerbread Can Sho the baker of Honiste. ' My House is not belt with Stavis. I not be Coarted by Boys nor navis. I Haive a man and a man Shall Haive me, if I whaint a fool I Send for Thee. ' If you are going to the D 1 wish you a good Gonery.' What in all the world have we here ? Exercising our utmost ingenuity for the purpose of determining, BOUND FOR LONDON 97 if possible, what petty, and perhaps not very reput- able, Bristol occurrence of the year 1770, this mystic piece of ill-written doggerel (the reader will observe that part of the letter is in a kind of cripple rhyme) has come down to us to perpetuate and represent, we can honestly arrive but at one conclusion that it is the spiteful epistle of some obscure female, avenging herself, with all the energy of feminine malice, for the spretcs injuria forma or some other fancied wrong. Did we dare to copy the version of the letter, or rather jocular answer to it, written in Chatterton's own hand on the back of the sheet, in the shape of a few extremely impolite and not at all quotable Hudibrastic lines, the hypothesis would appear inevit- able. In short, we explain the matter thus ; Among the various acquaintances of Chatterton interested in the news of his approaching departure is some one of the other sex, labouring under the provocation of some injury, or fancied injury, not now ascertainable. This Bristol Juno sees, with pangs incredible, her faith- less Jove dispensing the gingerbread he has bought at ' Mr. Freeling's over the way ' among the nymphs waiting for it on the steps of Redcliffe Church ; she goes home, and discharges all her malevolence in one fell epistle, into which, with vast literary effort, she contrives to introduce an allusion to the gingerbread; G 98 CHATTERTON this epistle, intended to pierce her Jove's heart like a poisoned arrow, she sends to him anonymously ; and he, reading it, and recognising the hand of the distempered donor, enjoys the joke amazingly, and expresses his opinion of it and her by scribbling his wicked answer on the other side. Strange bit of defunct real life thus to be dug up again into the light ! The departure of poor Chatterton for London from his native place was not, it would thus appear, an event which all Bristol viewed with indifference. Whether the Clayfields, the Barretts, and the Cat- cotts of his acquaintance cared much about the matter or not, whether Miss Rumsey shed tears or not, we cannot say ; but here, at least, was one sluttish denizen of some mean Bristol street in whose breast Chatterton left a rankling sense of wrong or jealousy, and who was powerfully enough excited by the news of his departure to immortalise her concern therein by penning a spiteful letter, in which she told him he was reported to be ' going to the D ,' and wished him a good journey. Chatterton was not going to the D directly : he was only going to London, to follow the profes- sional walk of literature. Persons going on that journey from the provinces now-a-days (and it must BOUND FOR LONDON 99 have been the same in Chatterton's time) usually carry three things with them, in addition to the mere essentials of luggage a little money, a small bundle of MSS., and a few letters of introduction. How was Chatterton furnished in these several respects ? As regards money, the most essential of the three, but very poorly, we fear. It would throw more light than a hundred disquisitions on the real facts of Chatterton's London career were we able to calculate to the precise shilling the sum of money which he took with him from Bristol. Unfortunately, there are no data for such a calculation. All that remains in the shape of information on this point is a vague tradition, the exact worth of which we do not know, that the understood arrangement among the chari- table persons who had agreed to get up a little subscription for him against his departure was that they should subscribe a guinea each. Subjecting this tradition to a strict act of judgment, directed by a knowledge of the laws of human nature in general and the circumstances of Chatterton's Bristol position in particular, one may say that the entire sum that could possibly be in Chatterton's purse in the week before he left Bristol did not (any contribution his mother could make included) exceed ten guineas. ioo CHATTERTON Take a more probable estimate still, and deduct the expenses of the outfit and journey, and we may say that Chatterton was elated with the prospect of invading London with a pecuniary force of exactly five guineas. But he had plenty of manuscripts. In one bundle he had the whole of the Rowley Poems and other antiques sElla, The Brislowe Tragedie, Goddwyn, The Tournament, The Battle of Hastings, The Parliamente of Sprytes, etc., ; all written and finished at least twelve months before, and forming matter enough to fill, if printed, one considerable volume. These, if he could either dispose of them in the mass, or sell them individually, would form a sufficient stock to begin with. On ^Ella, in particular, he naturally set great value. It was his masterpiece, worth a great deal of money even as an imitation of the antique, and worth ten times more if he could succeed in getting it accepted as a genuine English poem of the fifteenth century. If he should not be able to part with it advantageously under either guise, he would at any rate have it by him, to be printed some day or other at his own expense, and to make him famous as a poet and antiquarian ! Then, in another bundle, he had his miscellaneous modern pieces in prose and verse his BOUND FOR LONDON 101 Kew Gardens, his Consuliad> and other such satires after the manner of Pope and Churchill, with numer- ous songs, elegies, and other poetical trifles, and an assortment of odds and ends bearing on English antiquities. For these he cared far less himself than for his Rowley Poems ; but he had already ascer- tained that they were more disposable as literary ware, and accordingly he had of late almost abandoned the antique vein in their favour. They might be of use to him in his dealings with the magazines and newspapers ; and, if they should turn out not to be exactly suitable, he had a ready pen, and a head full of all kinds of historical knowledge, and should find no difficulty especially after his sister had forwarded to him his little collec- tion of books in throwing off such papers by the dozen ! Lastly, as regards the matter of introductions. It may seem strange to such as are accustomed to think such things essential to a young man migrat- ing from his native place, but we positively cannot find that Chatterton took one letter of introduction from Bristol with him. That Matthew Mease may have told him of some vintner of his acquaintance, living somewhere in Whitechapel, that would be glad to see him if he told him he knew Mat Mease of 102 CHATTERTON Bristol ; that Mr. Clayfield, or Mr. Barrett, or even his master, Mr. Lambert, may have recommended him to call at his leisure on certain well-to-do Smiths or Robinsons they had dealings with ; that his younger friends, the Mr. Carys and Mr. Rudhalls and Miss Rumseys and Miss Webbs, may have given him commissions and instructions destined to bring him into connection with metropolitan aunts living in Cam den Town, and long-forgotten cousins that had situations in the Custom House ; nay, that Mrs. Chatterton herself, taxing, with the grandmother's help, her genealogical memory, may have excogitated for the occasion a stray relative or two in London that it might be well to visit : all this is, of course, extremely probable. But (and the reason, in all likelihood, was that his whole circle of acquaintance could not muster such a thing) not a single letter to a literary notability did this 'mad genius' of Bristol, going on his expedition to set the Thames on fire, take in his portmanteau to be of use to him. Two things only seem to have been decided : first, that, on arriving in London, he should go to lodge at the house of a Mr. Walmsley, a plasterer in Shoreditch, where a Mrs. Ballance, a distant relative of his mother's, and who had already been written to on the subject, resided ; and, secondly, that his care on BOUND FOR LONDON 103 his arrival should be to seek out Mr. Edmunds at the Middlesex Journal office in Shoe Lane, and beat up the editorial quarters of the Town and Country Magazine. These were to be his foci in London ; and thence, by the force of his genius, he was to weave out new acquaintanceships, and spread him- self in all directions ! Nor, on the whole, was this plan perhaps the worst. Young authors coming to set the Thames on fire are by no means always welcome visitors to those more elderly practitioners of the same craft who, having become convinced by experience of the incombustibility of the river, have settled down on its banks with chastened hopes and more practical intentions ; and it is better in the long run for young authors themselves to purchase every inch of way they make into people's good graces by some equivalent addition of new work done and tendered. And yet who will say that introductions are of no use? The kind word of encouragement spoken now and then by the veteran litterateur to his younger brother, the business note written now and then in his service when anything in the shape of work turns up, the friendly invitation now and then when a few of the same craft are to meet : these courtesies, which it is in the power of introductions, in the proportion perhaps of one 104 CHATTERTON effective to ten given, to procure how much wear and tear of heart may they not save, how many paths through poverty to a rank London churchyard may they not make smoother ! These, a little extended and adjusted, would of themselves constitute in these days, and while more systematic promises are in abeyance, a very good organisation of literature. Nor, thank God, are these wanting. That hard, austere man of letters, young poet, who receives you so grimly, is so severe on your fallacies and commonplaces, says not a word to flatter you, and would almost drive you from literature to making shoes, let but an opportunity really to serve you present itself, and you shall find that man as true as steel and as kind as a woman ! That other man of letters, with the flashing wit and the impetuosity that stuns and blasts you, I could tell you of generous actions done by him ! And him, again, the broad, sagacious man of abundant humour and encyclopaedic lore, or him on whose silver hairs the honours of a long celebrity sit so gracefully what debts of gratitude, were they reckoned up, would be found owing by contem- poraries to them ! Such men there are in London in our own days, each cordial and assisting after his own method and in his own sphere; nor was London wanting in such in the days of Chatterton. Remem- BOUND FOR LONDON 105 bering this, and thinking which special man out of the 700,000 and odd souls then inhabiting London it might have been best for Chatterton to have come into connection with, one cannot but speculate what might have been the result had Chatterton taken with him from Bristol but one letter of introduction, addressed to Oliver Goldsmith. ' To Dr. Goldsmith, at No. 2 Brick Court, Middle Temple, favoured by Mr. Chatterton ' one lingers in fancy over the probable consequences of a letter bearing that super- scription. But it did not so happen. It was on Tuesday, the 24th of April, and, as near as we can guess, between eight and nine in the evening, that Chatterton, who had probably never been a single whole day out of Bristol before, took his final farewell of it. By the help of the Gentle- mans Magazine for April 1771, which contains a register of the weather for the same month in the previous year, we are able to tell pretty exactly the state of the weather at the time. Monday, the 23rd., had been ' a cloudy day, very cold, with some little hail and a strong north-west wind;' and on Tuesday, the 24th, though the wind had veered round to the south-west, it was still 'cold and cloudy.' On the evening of that cloudy day, when it is already 106 CHATTERTON almost dark, and the streets are damp with ap- proaching rain, three figures stand at an inn door in Bristol, waiting for the starting of the London coach. They are Chatterton, wrapped up for his journey, a tight, well-built youth, of middle size ; his sister, a grown young woman, two years older than himself; and his mother, a sad-looking elderly person, in a cloak. Round about the coach, and greatly in the way of the porters, who are putting on the luggage, are one or two young men that have gone there to bid Chatterton once more good-bye. They stand and talk for a few minutes in the midst of the bustle, while the passengers are hurrying backwards and forwards between the coach and the lighted passage of the inn. At last all is ready ; the luggage is put up, and the other passengers have taken their seats. ' Good-bye, Tom ; God bless you ; and mind to write as soon as you get to London, falters the widow for the last time. Tom hears her; bids her good-bye, his sister good-bye, the rest good-bye ; and springs into his place in what was then called 'the basket' of the coach, i.e., an exterior accommodation slung low down to the body. 'All right/ cries the guard, and blows his horn ; the coachman cracks his whip, the horses' hoofs clatter ; and away along the ill-lit streets goes the BOUND FOR LONDON 107 clumsy vehicle, out towards the suburbs of Bristol, Chatterton slung in the basket. The widow stands at the inn door watching it till it disappears ; then, taking her daughter's arm, and gathering her cloak around her, walks home with a heavy heart through the drizzle. PART II LONDON CHAPTER I SHOREDITCH READER, were you ever in Shoreditch? If you are an inhabitant of London, you may know all about it ; if not, get a map of London, and you will see that the locality named Shoreditch forms part of one of the great highways leading northwards from the centre of the city towards the suburbs. The part of this highway nearest the city, including about half a mile of houses on both sides, is called Bishopsgate Street, from the fact that here stood one of the ancient gates of the city, erected by a Saxon bishop of some early century ; beyond that for about a quarter of a mile, the thoroughfare is called Norton Folgate, or, as it was originally pronounced, the Northern Foldgate ; after which, extending for another quarter of a mile, and terminating in Hackney, is Shoreditch proper, the principal street of a populous parish of the same name. Tradition ascribes the origin of the name to the circumstance 111 112 CHATTERTON that Jane Shore, the mistress of Edward IV., ended her life here ' Within a ditch of loathsome scent, Which carrion dogs did much frequent,' as the ballad says : but old Stow settles that matter by saying he could prove by record that as early as four hundred years before his time the place had been called Soersditch. However this may be, the place deserves, or till recently did deserve, its name. There is, indeed, no very obvious vestige of a ditch now thereabouts, whatever a more strict investigation might disclose ; but the neighbourhood has not, on the whole, a very attractive look. The aspect which Shoreditch proper now presents is that of a broad, bustling street of old-fronted houses, full of hetero- geneous shops, some of them exhibiting consider- able displays of cheap hats, haberdashery, shoes, ready-made clothes, and groceries, but others belonging rather to the costermonger species. Narrower streets, of more mean appearance, branch out from it on both sides. Altogether, Shoreditch is not the part of London where a literary man of the present day would voluntarily seek lodgings ; and the case was probably much the same in Chat- terton's time. Indeed, long before that, Shoreditch, partly perhaps on account of the peculiar suggestive- SHOREDITCH 113 ness of its name, had obtained an unenviable reputa- tion as a low neighbourhood. 'To die in Shoreditch' was synonymous, in the writings of the wits of Dryden's time, with dying like a profligate and having hags for one's nurses. It was here, however, that Chatterton lodged when he first came to London. We have already mentioned that the only definite arrangement he seems to have made for his sojourn in London, before leaving Bristol, consisted in his having written to Mrs. Ballance, a distant relative of his mother, who lived in the house of a Mr. Walmsley, a plasterer, in Shoreditch, asking her to secure a lodging for him against his arrival. Mrs. Ballance, whom we picture as an elderly woman, the widow of some seafaring man, living in London in a meagre, eleemosynary way, appears to have replied to this letter by writing to Mrs. Chatterton that Thomas had better come at once to Mr. Walmsley's. where he could be accommodated in the meantime at least, and where she would do her best to make him comfortable. Accordingly, it was to Mr. Walmsley's in Shore- ditch that Chatterton, on his arrival in London, on the evening of Wednesday the 25th of April I77> contrived to make his way. Where the Bristol H ii4 CHATTERTON coach of that day stopped we do not know, though even that might be ascertained if one were very curious about it ; but, as it must have been in the yard of some inn near the heart of the City, Chatter- ton had not far to go before introducing himself to Mrs. Ballance, if, indeed, the good woman did not make her appearance at the coach to meet her young relative. It shows the impatience and the spirit of the young stranger thus deposited in the streets of London that, late as it was when he arrived at Mr. Walmsley's (it must have been between five and six o'clock in the evening), and tired as he must have been with his twenty hours' journey, he did not remain long within doors, but, having seen his boxes safe, and escaped the assiduities of Mrs. Ballance, sallied out for a ramble, and to make calls on the persons through whose patronage he hoped to gain a footing in literary circles. So much, at least, we infer from the following letter to his mother, written on the morning of the 26th, after he had slept his first night at Mr. Walmsley's, and giving an account of his journey and his first proceedings in London 'LONDON, April 26, 1770 DEAR MOTHER, Here I am, safe and in high spirits. To give you a journal of my tour would not be unneces- SHOREDITCH 115 sary. After riding in the basket to Brislington, I mounted the top of the coach, and rid easy, and was agreeably en- tertained with the conversation of a Quaker in dress, but little so in personals and behaviour. This laughing Friend, who is a carver, lamented his having sent his tools to Worcester, as otherwise he would have accompanied me to London. I left him at Bath; when, finding it rained pretty fast, I entered an inside passenger to Speenhamland, the half-way stage, paying seven shillings. 'Twas lucky I did so, for it snowed all night, and on Marlborough Downs the snow was near a foot high. 'At seven in the morning I breakfasted at Speenham- land, and then mounted the coach-box for the remainder of the day, which was a remarkable fine one. Honest Gee-ho complimented me with assuring me that I sat bolder and tighter than any person who ever rid with him. Dined at Stroud most luxuriously with a young gentleman, who had slept all the preceding night in the machine, and an old mercantile genius, whose schoolboy son had a great deal of wit, as the father thought, in remarking that Windsor was as old as our Saviour's time. 1 Got into London about five o'clock in the evening. Called upon Mr. Edmunds, Mr. Fell, Mr. Hamilton, and Mr. Dodsley. Great encouragement from them ; all approved of my design. Shall soon be settled. Call upon Mr. Lambert; show him this; or tell him, if I deserve a recommendation, he would oblige me to give me one : if I do not, it will be beneath him to take notice of me. Seen all aunts, cousins all well and I am welcome. Mr. T. Wensley is alive, and coming home. Sister, grandmother, etc., remember. I remain your dutiful son, T. CHATTERTON.' It is a curious corroboration of Chatterton's ii6 CHATTERTON account of the weather during his journey that in the meteorological registers of the Gentleman's Magazine Wednesday the 25th of April 1770 the day on which Chatterton sat beside the driver of the Bristol coach all the way from Speenhamland to London is entered as a day of ' smart frost, very bright and very cold,' snow having fallen in some parts of the country during the previous night. It was on the evening of this bright, cold day, there- fore (or, notwithstanding the wording of his letter, was it not rather next morning?), that Chatterton, setting out from Mr. Walmsley's, contrived, by in- quiring his way of people he met, to pilot himself along Shoreditch, Norton Folgate, and Bishopsgate Street, towards the City, bent as he was on calling without delay on the four publishers mentioned in his letter Mr. Edmunds, Mr. Fell, Mr. Hamilton, and Mr. Dodsley. Let us see if we can make out anything respecting those gentlemen. They were the first persons Chatterton visited in London, and some of them had not a little to do with his sub- sequent fate. Mr. Edmunds has been already introduced to the reader. He was the proprietor, editor, and pub- lisher of the Middlesex Journal, a bi-weekly news- paper, to which, we have seen, Chatterton had sent SHOREDITCH 117 several communications from Bristol. His offices were in Shoe Lane, Holborn. Of Mr. Hamilton we learn something from that interesting collec- tion of scraps, Nichols's Literary Anecdotes of the Eighteenth Century. He was the printer and proprietor of the Town and Country Magazine; in which capacity Chatterton had, as we know, for some time corresponded with him. He was the son of one Archibald Hamilton, a Scotsman who, having been obliged to quit Edinburgh in 1736 for having been actively concerned in the Porteous Riot, had settled in London as a printer, and had made a considerable fortune. The son of this Archibald, enjoying the benefit of his father's connection, had also set up as a printer. He had, says Nichols, two printing-offices, one 'in the coun- try, on the road between Highgate and Finchley,' the other in town, 'near St. John's Gate, Clerken- well ' ; and it was probably in allusion to this circumstance that, when he started a new magazine, in the beginning of 1769, he named it the Town and Country Magazine. The magazine, Nichols informs us, had 'a prodigious sale.' Nichols also gives us some particulars respecting Dodsley, in addition to those already communicated to the reader. Having succeeded his brother Robert, ii8 CHATTERTON whose junior he was by twenty-two years, in the year 1759, James Dodsley had carried on the book- selling business in Pall Mall so profitably as to be already a wealthy man. When he died in 1797, he left a fortune of 70,000; and a good part of this sum must have been accumulated before 1770, when he was forty-five years of age. ' By a habit of ex- cluding himself from the world,' says Nichols, ' Mr. James Dodsley, who certainly possessed a liberal heart and a strong understanding, had acquired many peculiarities.' One of these is mentioned as specially characteristic. ' He kept a carriage many years, but studiously wished his friends should not know it ; nor did he ever use it on the eastern side of Temple Bar/ The inscription on the tablet erected to the memory of the bookseller in St. James's Church, Westminster, where he was buried, is to the same effect ' He was a man/ says the epitaph, 'of a retired and contemplative turn of mind, though engaged in a very extensive line of public business ; he was upright and liberal in his dealings, a friend to the afflicted in general, and to the poor of this parish in particular/ in fact, an eccentric, shy, good sort of man. Finally, what of Mr. Fell ? From what Chatterton says of him, we learn that he was printer, publisher, and editor SHOREDITCH 119 of the Freeholder's Magazine, a periodical conducted in the interest of Wilkes, to which, as well as to the Town and Country, Chatterton had recently sent articles for insertion. 1 We imagine him to have been a needy, nondescript kind of publisher, with a place of business in Paternoster Row, and not so respectable as either Edmunds or Hamilton, not to speak of Dodsley. Such were the four persons upon whom we are to imagine the impetuous young fellow who had just come off the Bristol coach dropping in unexpectedly long, long ago. His hopes from Edmunds were, of course, chiefly in connection with the Middlesex Journal. Through Fell he might strengthen his footing in the Freeholder's Magazine, and have access to whatever else might be going on under the auspices of Wilkes. From Hamilton he looked for further employment on the Town and Country. From Dodsley his expectations were pro- bably still higher. Besides being the publisher of the Annual Register, Dodsley was a bookseller on a large scale, and a publisher of poetry ; it was to him that Chatterton had applied by letter sixteen 1 From a note in the Aldine Edition of Chatterton's works (1875), I find that his satirical poem called The Consuliad had appeared in the Freeholder's Magazine for January 1770, signed *C.,' and dated ' Bristol, Jan. 4, 1770.' 120 CHATTERTON months before as a likely person to publish his one or two letters had probably passed between them since; and, in resolving to introduce himself personally to this magnate of books, Chatterton had, doubtless, dreams not only of the opening of the Annual Register to his casual scribblings, but also of the appearance of his Rowley performances some day or other in the form of one or more well printed volumes, the wonder of all the critics. It was with these views on the persons severally concerned that Chatterton made his four rapid calls. The enter- prise was certainly less Quixotic than if a young literary provincial now-a-days were, on the first day of his being in London, to call on Murray or Longman or Messrs. Macmillan, then to beat up the office of the Daily News in search of the editor, after that to seek an interview with the editor of The Fortnightly, and finally to go and see what could be done on the Illustrated News or the Graphic. Still, with all allowance for the difference between that day and this, the idea of achieving interviews with four different editors and publishers in one ramble was somewhat bold. As regards mere time and distance, to compass calls, in such circum- stances, on four different persons one of them living in Shoe Lane, another at St. John's Gate, SHOREDITCH 121 Clerkenwell, a third in Pall Mall, and the fourth somewhere else can have been no easy task. But Chatterton was a resolute youth, with plenty of the faculty of self-assertion, and capable, as we imagine, not only of making four calls in one walk, but also of going through each without any unnecessary degree of bashfulness. We have no doubt that he saw Hamilton, Fell, Edmunds, and Dodsley himself, with the most perfect self-assurance ; that he ex- plained his case to them, and stated what he wanted from them, very distinctly ; and that, with the ad- vantage he had in having corresponded with all of them before, he came off from the interviews in a satisfactory manner. As to how they received him, and what they said to him, we have but his own words to his mother 'Great encouragement from them ; all approved of my design.' The mean- ing of this is somewhat problematical. Dodsley, we imagine, nervous and shy person as he was, may have been a little discomposed by the talk of the impetuous young visitor who had so unceremon- iously burst in upon him, and, while listening with tolerable courtesy to what he said, may have been mentally resolving to have nothing more to do with that odd Bristol lad, if once he could get him out. Hamilton and Edmunds, we fancy, were civil 122 CHATTERTON and general, with perhaps an intention to let the lad write for them, if he chose to do so. Fell, as a needier man, and more ready to catch at a promising literary recruit, was probably the most cordial of all. And so, tired and happy, the young stranger bent his steps homewards in the direction of Shore- ditch. Ah ! one wonders whether, in passing along Shoe Lane after his interview with Edmunds, brush- ing with his shoulder the ugly black wall of that workhouse burying- ground on the site of which Farringdon Market now stands, any presentiment occurred to him of a spectacle which, four short months afterwards, that very spot was to witness those young limbs of his, now so full of life, tJten closed up stark and unclaimed in a workhouse shell, and borne carelessly and irreverently by one or two men along that very wall to a pauper's hasty grave ! No, he paces all unwittingly, poor young heart, that spot of his London doom, where even now, remembering him, one shudders as one walks. God, in his mercy, hangs the veil. In what precise part of Shoreditch that house of Mr. Walmsley was in which Chatterton lodged when he first came to London, and to which, on that SHOREDITCH 123 memorable day, he returned through many dark and strange streets, we do not know. London Directories of the year 1770 are not things easy to be found ; and, could we find one, we should not be very likely to find Mr. Walmsley's name in it. In these circumstances, the literary antiquary, as he walks along Shoreditch, may be allowed to single out, as the object of his curiosity, any old-looking house he pleases along the whole length of the thorough- fare on either side, it being stipulated only that the house so selected shall be conceivable as having once been the abode of a plasterer. For our part, we have an incommunicable impression as if the house were to be sought in the close vicinity of the terminus of the Eastern Counties Railway, or where Shoreditch passes into Norton Folgate. Let that fancy stand, therefore, in lieu of a better. Here, then, Chatterton slept his first night in London. Here, on the following morning, he breakfasted in the company of his relative, Mrs. Ballance, giving her the news of Bristol, and receiving from her such bits of news in return as she had to communicate, including the intelli- gence that Mr. T. Wensley a seaman or petty officer, as we learn from a subsequent allusion, on board a King's ship, but a native of Bristol, and 124 CHATTERTON on that account known to the Chatterton family was alive, and on his way home. Hence also he sets out to visit those aunts and cousins mentioned in the letter as being all well and glad to see him, who, it is to be hoped, did not live far from Shoreditch. Here, some time or other in the course of the day Thursday, the 26th, his first real day in London, and ' a very coarse, wet, cold day' it was, says the Gentleman's Magazine he writes his letter home, so as to send it by that day's post. And here, during the remaining days of that month Friday, the 27th, 'a very coarse, wet day, but not so cold ' ; Saturday, the 28th, 'a heavy morning, bright afternoon, cold wind'; Sunday, the 29th, ' a very bright day, hot sun, cold wind ' ; and Monday, the 3Oth, ' chiefly bright, flying clouds, no rain and warm ' ; he soon finds himself fairly domiciled, becoming more familiar with the Walmsleys and Mrs. Ballance, whom he sees in the mornings, and starting off every forenoon for a walk, along Norton Folgate and Bishopsgate Street, towards those quarters of the metropolis where the chief attractions lay. Chatterton lived in Mr. Walmsley's house in Shoreditch about six weeks in all, or from the 24th of April to the beginning of June. We are SHOREDITCH 125 fortunately able to give a somewhat particular account of the economy of Mr. Walmsley's family, and of the kind of accommodation which Chatter- ton had there, and the impression he made on the various members of it during his stay. The Rev. Sir Herbert Croft, already mentioned as one who took much pains more pains, in fact, than any- body else from that time to this to inform himself of the real particulars of Chatterton's life, hunted out the Walmsley family in Shoreditch while the memory of Chatterton was still fresh, and ascer- tained all he could from them regarding the habits of the singular being whose brief stay among them had been an event of such consequence in the history of their humble household. The following is an extract from Sir Herbert's Love and Madness, embodying all that he could gather about Chatterton from this source 'The man and woman where he first lodged are still [1780] living in the same house. He is a plasterer. They, and their nephew and niece (the latter about as old as Chatterton would be now, the former three years younger), and Mrs. Ballance who lodged in the house and desired them to let Chatterton, her relation, live there also have been seen. The little collected from them you shall have in their own words . . . ' Mrs. Ballance says he was as proud as Lucifer. He very soon quarrelled with her for calling him "Cousin 126 CHATTERTON Tommy," and asked her if she ever heard of a poet's being called Tommy ; but she assured him that she knew nothing of poets, and only wished he would not set up for a gentleman. Upon her recommending it to him to get into some office, when he had been in town two or three weeks, he stormed about the room like a madman, and frightened her not a little by telling her that he hoped, with the blessing of God, very soon to be sent prisoner to the Tower, which would make his fortune. He would often look steadfastly in a person's face, without speaking or seeming to see the person, for a quarter of an hour or more, till it was quite frightful; during all which time (she supposes from what she has since heard) his thoughts were gone about something else. . . . He frequently declared that he should settle the nation before he had done; but how could she think that her poor cousin Tommy was so great a man as she now finds he was ? His mother should have written word of his greatness, and then, to be sure, she would have humoured the gentleman accordingly. ' Mr. Walmsley observed little in him, but that there was something manly and pleasing about him, and that he did not dislike the wenches. 'Mrs. Walmsley's account is, that she never saw any harm of him that he never mislisted her, but was always very civil whenever they met in the house by accident; that he would never suffer the room in which he used to read and write to be swept, because, he said, poets hated brooms; that she told him she did not know anything poet-folks were good for, but to sit in a dirty cap and gown in a garret, and at last to be starved ; that, during the nine (?) weeks he was at her house, he never stayed out after the family hours except once, when he did not come home all night, and had been, she heard, poeiing a song about the streets. ( This night, Mrs. Ballance says, SHOREDITCH 127 she knows he lodged at a relation's, because Mr. Walmsley's house was shut up when he came home.) 'The niece says, for her part, she always took him more for a mad boy than anything else, he would have such flights and vagaries ; that, but for his face, and her knowledge of his age, she should never have thought him a boy, he was so manly, and so much himself; that no women came after him, nor did she know of any connection but still that he was a sad rake, and terribly fond of women, and would sometimes be saucy to her; that he ate what he chose to have with his relation Mrs. Ballance, who lodged in the house ; but that he never touched meat, and drank only water, and seemed to live on the air. . . . The niece adds that he was good-tempered, and agreeable, and obliging, but sadly proud and haughty : nothing was too good for him; nor was anything to be too good for his grandmother, mother, and sister, hereafter. . . . That he used to sit up almost all night, reading and writing ; and that her brother said he was afraid to lie with him for, to be sure, he was a spirit, and never slept ; for he never came to bed till it was morning, and then, for what he saw, never closed his eyes. 'The nephew (Chatterton's bed-fellow during the first six weeks he lodged there) says that, notwithstanding his pride and haughtiness, it was impossible to help liking him ; that he lived chiefly upon a bit of bread, or a tart, and some water but he once or twice saw him take a sheep's tongue out of his pocket ; that Chatterton, to his knowledge, never slept while they lay together ; that he never came to bed till very late, sometimes three or four o'clock, and was always awake when he (the nephew) waked, and got up at the same time, about five or six ; that almost every morning the floor was covered with pieces of paper not so big as six- pences, into which he had torn what he had been writing before he came to bed. 128 CHATTERTON Bating some spitefulness in the recollection of Chatterton's haughty airs, apparent in the evidence of Mrs. Ballance and the niece, and a slight tendency to the marvellous apparent in that of the nephew (who was but a boy of fourteen when Chatterton shared the room with him), the above presents, we believe, a picture of Chatterton, as he appeared in the narrow Walmsley circle, as accurate as it is vivid. Walmsley himself one rather likes. One fancies him an easy sort of fellow, not troubling himself much about domestic matters, going out to his work in the morning, and leaving his lodger to the care of the women-folk. After he is gone, we are to suppose, Chatterton spends the morning in reading and writing, while Mrs. Walmsley, Mrs. Ball- ance, and the niece are slatterning about the house ; and generally, as the forenoon advances, he goes out for his walk towards the places of London resort. Along Norton Folgate and Bishopsgate Street, passing crowds of people and hackney-coaches, and glancing, with the eye of an antiquarian and a connoisseur in architecture, at such buildings of antique aspect as are or then were conspicuous in that thoroughfare the old church of St. Helen's, the old church of St. Ethelburga, and that much-admired remnant of the civic architecture of the fifteenth SHOREDITCH 129 century, Crosby Hall, or Crosby Place, mentioned in Shakespeare's Richard ill. : so the metropolitan reader, if he desires to be exact, may follow Chat- terton in his daily walks from Mr. Walmsley's in Shoreditch. For the rest, his wanderings may be various : frequently, of course, along the main line of Cornhill, past the Bank, as it then was, and the then new Mansion House, into Cheapside ; thence slowly along the purlieus of St. Paul's, with a peculiar lingering among the bookshops of Paternoster Row ; and, further, down Ludgate Hill and up Fleet Street, towards Temple Bar and the Strand. Visits of busi- ness were, we may be sure, not neglected ; and, in achieving his transits from one place to another, Chatterton, like the rest of us, may have been guilty of the folly of attempting short cuts, and so have be- wildered himself in mazes of mean streets, proving their populousness by swarms of children, yet never to be seen by him, or by anybody else, more than once. Oh, the weariness of those aimless walks of a young literary adventurer, without purse or friend, in the streets of London ! The perpetual and anxious thought within, which scarcely any street-distraction can amuse ; the listlessness with which, on coming to the parting of two ways, one suffers the least accident I 130 CHATTERTON to determine which way one will take, both being indifferent ; the vain castle-building in sanguine mo- ments, when thousands of pounds seem possible and near ; the utter prostration of spirit at other moments, when one inspects the shivering beggar that passes with new interest as but another form of one's self, and when every glimpse of a damp, grassless church- yard through a railing acts as a horrible premonition of what may be the end ; the curious and habitual examination of physiognomies met as one goes along ; the occasional magic of a bright eye, or a lovely form, shooting a pang through the heart, and calling up, it may be, the image of a peerless one, distant, denied, but unforgotten, till the soul melts in very tenderness, and all the past is around one again ; the sudden start from such a mood, the flush, the clenched hand, the set teeth, the resolve, the manly hope, the dream of a home quiet and blest after all with one sweet presence : and then, after that, the more composed gait, and the saunter towards the spots one prefers, till the waning day, or the need to work and eat, brings one back fatigued to the lonely room ! And so from day to day a repetition of the same process. Ah, London, London ! thou per- petual home of a shifting multitude, how many a soul there is within thee at this hour, who, listening SHOREDITCH 131 to that peculiar roar of thine, which shows the con- course of myriads in thee, and yet feeling excluded, like an unclaimed atom, from the midst of thy bustle, might cry aloud to thee, ' I, too, am strong ; I am young ; I am willing ; I can do something ; leave me not out ; attend to me ; make room for me ; de- vise the means of absorbing me, and such as me, within thy just activity ; and defer not till I and they make thee hearken with our shrieks ! ' But London rolls on ; and men, young and old, do demand impossible things. If it is impossible to make the medium without conform, some power is at least left to shape and rule the spirit within. Chatterton, we believe, came to London with as practical and resolute a spirit as any literary ad- venturer before or since. His excitement with his change of position, his confidence in being able to make his way, and his activity in availing himself of every means of doing so, seem to have been really prodigious. Hence, probably, his first walks in London were as little listless as was possible in the circumstances. Instead of idle and aimless saunterings, such as we have described, many of his London walks during the first week or two of his stay at Shoreditch must have been direct visits from spot to spot, and from person to person. By 132 CHATTERTON no means diffident or bashful, and, so far as we can see, perfectly heart-whole in respect of all the Bristol beauties he had left, he probably wasted less time than many others with less genius would have wasted in useless regrets and pointless reveries. Compared with his life at Bristol, where he had been the miser- able drudge of a lawyer's office, his present life, now that he was a rover in London, appeared to him, doubtless, all but paradisaic. To work in the morning in his lodging in Shoreditch, with some- times a saucy word for his landlady's niece ; then to go out to make calls, and see sights in various quarters, buying a tart at a pastrycook's for his dinner, spending a shilling or two in other little purchases, and quite alive always to the distraction of a pretty face wherever he chanced to be; then to come home again at an earlier or a later hour, and to sit up half the night writing and tearing papers, greatly to the bewilderment and alarm of that very ill-used boy, Master Walmsley : here was happiness, here was liberty, here was a set of conditions in which to begin the process of setting fire to the Thames ! So, at least, it seemed to Chatterton himself during his first fortnight in London ; for, when Mrs. Ballance, at the end of that period, ventured to suggest that he should try to get into some office, we have seen SHOREDITCH 133 what thanks the poor woman got. To be sure, had Mrs. Chatterton sent her word beforehand what a great man Cousin Tommy was, she would have humoured the gentleman accordingly ! But how was she to know ? Ah, how indeed ? CHAPTER II TOWN TALK LONG AGO IN coming to London, Chatterton, of course, came into the midst of all the politics and current talk of the day. Bristol, indeed, as a bustling and mercantile place, had had its share of interest in the general on-goings of the nation ; and regularly, as the coach had brought down the last new materials of gossip from London, the politicians of Bristol had gone through the budget, and given the Bristol imprimatur, or the reverse, to the opinions pronounced by the metropolitan authori- ties. Sometimes, too, Bristol, from its western position and its extensive shipping connections, might have the start even of London in a bit of American news. On the whole, however, going from Bristol to London was like going from dark- ness into light, from the suburbs to the centre, from the shilling gallery to the pit-stalls. Let us see what were the pieces (small enough they seem now) 134 TOWN TALK LONG AGO 135 in course of performance on the stage of British life when Chatterton had thus just shifted his place in the theatre in other words, what were the topics which afforded matter of talk to that insatiable gossip, the Town, towards the end of April, and during the whole of May, 1770. First, monopolising nearly the whole ground of the domestic politics of the time, was the everlasting case of Wilkes and Liberty, begun seven years before, when Chatterton was a boy at Colston's School, but still apparently far from a conclusion There had been a change, however, in the relative situations of the parties. Amongst the most earnest defenders of Wilkes and advocates of the right of free election were the authorities of the Corporation of the City of London, then under the mayoralty of the celebrated Beckford. With other corporations and public bodies, they had sent in petitions to the King on the subject. These petitions having been ungraciously received, Beck- ford and his colleagues had had the boldness to wait on the King (March I4th) and address a personal remonstrance to him. The King's reply was as follows ' I shall always be ready to receive the requests and to listen to the complaints of my subjects ; but it gives me 136 CHATTERTON great concern to find that any of them should have been so far misled as to offer me an address and remonstrance the contents of which I cannot but consider as disrespect- ful to me, injurious to my parliament, and irreconcilable to the principles of the constitution.' Having read this speech, the King gave the Lord Mayor and others of the deputation his hand to kiss ; after which, as they were withdrawing, he turned round to his courtiers and laughed. ' Nero fiddled whilst Rome was burning,' was the grandilo- quent remark of Parson Home on the occasion ; and, though this was a little too strong, it is certain that the city people were very angry. So, out of revenge, and partly as a compensation to Wilkes for his exclusion from the House of Commons, they made Wilkes an alderman. The patriot had hardly been out of prison a week when, on 24th of April the day on which Chatterton left Bristol he was sworn in as alderman for the ward of Farringdon Without and received a magnificent banquet on the occasion. This accession of Wilkes to the Corporation of the City of London was not only a defiance to the Court and the ruling party ; it was also intended to increase the power of the City to annoy those enemies in future. With such a man as Beckford for mayor, and with such men as Wilkes, Sawbridge, Townshend, and Crosby on TOWN TALK LONG AGO 137 the bench of aldermen all popular men and of strong liberal opinions what might the Corpora- tion not do ? The same part which was being acted in the City by Lord Mayor Beckford and his colleagues was acted within the more important sphere of Parliament by the Opposition in both Houses. The Parliament of that session had been opened on the pth of January, and it was to be prorogued on the i pth of May. The case of Wilkes had been before it from first to last, so that it had discussed little else. Uniting in this case, and making it the ground of a common antagonism to the Court and the Ministry, the various elements of the Opposition had constituted themselves into a powerful phalanx, the leaders of which in the one House were Lord Chatham, the Marquis of Rockingham, the Dukes of Richmond, Portland, and Devonshire, and Lords Shelburne and Temple, and in the other House Edmund Burke, Colonel Barre, George Grenville, and others. It was ' Wilkes, Wilkes,' with those men every day of the session, whenever, in fact, they wished to have a wrestling-match with the Ministers. Thus, on the very first day of the session, Chatham had made a motion on the subject in the House of Lords ; on which occasion, to 138 CHATTERTON the surprise of everybody, Lord Chancellor Camden seceded from his colleagues, and expressed his dis- approbation of their policy. He was forthwith de- prived of the seals, and the Lord Chancellorship went a-begging. Then followed, as we know, the resigna- tion of the premiership by the Duke of Grafton, and the formation of a second edition of the same cabinet under Lord North. It was in this unpopular North administration of 1770 that young Charles Fox, then the greatest rake and gambler about town, first took office as a junior lord of the Admiralty ; and the earliest parliamentary displays of this future chief of the Whigs were in the cause of that very policy to the denunciation and destruction of which he afterwards devoted his life. Many were the gibes against this young orator of the North party, whose abilities were already recognised, and whose swarthy complexion and premature corpulence (he was only twenty-one when the wits nicknamed him Niger Fox the Fat) made him a good butt for personal attacks ; and a caricature of the day is still extant, with the title of ' The Death of the Foxes,' in which Lord Holland, as the old fox, and his son Charles, as the young one, are represented hanging from a gallows, while Farmer Bull and his wife are rejoicing over their emancipated poultry. Fox was, of course, TOWN TALK LONG AGO 139 no friend to Wilkes ; and, in the lower House, it devolved on him to resist the motions of Burke and Barre* in Wilkes's case. It was in the House of Lords, however, that the agitation on that case was chiefly kept up. Among the most decisive measures of the Opposition was a renewed motion of Chatham's in that house on the ist of May that is, some days after Wilkes's release and promotion to the dignity of alderman ' to appeal and rescind the resolutions of the House of Commons in regard to the expulsion and incapacitation of Mr. Wilkes.' There was a stormy debate, in which the principal speakers were, on the one side, the Duke of Richmond, Lord Chatham, Lord Lyttelton, Lord Camden, Lord Shel- burne, and Lord Stanhope, and, on the other, the Duke of Grafton, Lord Denbigh, Lord Mansfield, Lord Egmont, Lord Pomfret, Lord Weymouth, and Lord Gower. The motion was lost by a majority of eighty-nine against forty-three votes. If one may judge from the following paragraph in the London Evening News of May the 8th, the excitement in town, in the week following this motion, must have been even greater than usual ' Tuesday ', May %th. Yesterday a great number of people assembled in the lobby of the House of Commons and the avenues adjoining, in consequence of a report which had 140 CHATTERTON been spread that Mr. Alderman Wilkes intended to go thither that day to claim a seat. The crowd was so great that members were hindered from passing and re- passing ; whereupon the gallery was ordered to be locked and the lobby to be cleared. But Mr. Wilkes did not go to the House.' As Parliament was prorogued on the iQth of May, there was an end, for that season, to all parlia- mentary discussion of the case of Wilkes. Members, to use the words of Junius, ' retired into summer quarters to rest from the disgraceful labours of the campaign ' ; and Wilkes had to be content with sitting on the bench as an alderman, and organising, with Beckford, Sawbridge, and the rest of the city- folk, a new deputation to gall the King. One of the most famous incidents of the time was the inter- view of this deputation with the King on the 23rd of May, an interview which was not procured with- out difficulty. The deputation having been intro- duced into the royal presence, the Lord Mayor, Beckford, read a 'humble remonstrance' to his Majesty with as much spice in it, however, as the form of such documents allowed on the decisive terms in which he had been pleased to characterise their address and petition of the I4th of March. The King was implored to 'break through all the secret and visible machinations to which the City TOWN TALK LONG AGO 141 of London had owed its late severe repulse,' and to ' disclaim the malignant and pernicious advice ' which had induced him to meet the former deputa- tion with so sharp an answer: 'an advice of most dangerous tendency, inasmuch as thereby the exer- cise of the clearest rights of the subject namely, to petition the King for redress of grievances, to complain of the violation of the freedom of election, to pray dissolution of parliament, to point out mal- practices in administration, and to urge the removal of evil ministers hath, by the generality of one compendious word, been indiscriminately checked with reprimand.' No sooner had the King heard this than, facing Beckford in a way that showed his natural obstinacy, he read the following answer ' I should have been wanting to the public, as well as to myself, if I had not expressed my dissatisfaction at the late address. My sentiments on that subject continue the same; and I should ill deserve to be considered as the Father of my people if I should suffer myself to be prevailed upon to make such an use of my prerogative as I cannot but think inconsistent with the interest, and dangerous to the constitution, of the kingdom.' Whereupon Beckford, excited beyond all regard for the usual formalities of royal audiences, is said to have burst forth in an extempore speech ' Most gracious Sovereign, will your Majesty be pleased I 4 2 CHATTERTON so far to condescend as to permit the mayor of your loyal City of London to declare in your royal presence, on behalf of his fellow-citizens, how much the bare appre- hension of your Majesty's displeasure would at all times affect their minds. The declaration of that displeasure has already filled them with inexpressible anxiety, and with the deepest affliction. Permit me, Sire, to assure your Majesty, that your Majesty has not, in all your dominions, any subjects more faithful, more dutiful, or more affectionate to your Majesty's person and family, or more ready to sacrifice their lives and fortunes in the maintenance of the true honour and dignity of your crown. ' We do, therefore, with the greatest humility and sub- mission, most earnestly supplicate your Majesty that you will not dismiss us from your presence without expressing a more favourable opinion of your faithful citizens, and without some comfort, without some prospect at least of redress. ' Permit me, Sire, further to observe that whoever has already dared, or shall hereafter endeavour, by false in- sinuations and suggestions, to alienate your Majesty's affections from your loyal subjects in general, and from the City of London in particular, and to withdraw your confidence in and regard for your people, is an enemy to your Majesty's person and family, a violator of the public peace, and a betrayer of our happy constitution as it was established at the glorious Revolution.' This bold harangue, so contrary to all rules of etiquette, caused a consternation among the courtiers; the King, who had been trapped into hearing it by the surprise of the moment, resented it as an insult ; TOWN TALK LONG AGO 143 and the deputation retired with the consciousness that the breach between the City of London and the King had been made wider than ever. Beckford, however, gained great credit by his conduct ; the speech that he had made to the King (or the above improved edition of it) was in everybody's lips ; and, for the time, he rose to as high a popularity as Wilkes. While the case of Wilkes, with the numerous questions that had grown out of it, thus formed the chief matter of controversy in the politics of the day, there was another question fraught, as the issue proved, with still more remarkable con- sequences which, after having been a topic of occasional discussion for several years, began, about the time of Chatterton's arrival in London, to assume a more pressing and public aspect. This was the question of the disaffection of the American Colonies. In the year 1764-5, as all readers of History know, the Parliament of Great Britain gave the first deadly shock to the allegiance of the American Colonies to the British Crown by decreeing the imposition on those Colonies of a general stamp tax. The Colonies, severally and conjointly, had protested and petitioned against this act of authority; 144 CHATTERTON and in 1767 the stamp tax had been exchanged for a duty on paper, glass, painters' colours, and teas. This, however, had not satisfied the Americans. From year to year the topic had been brought up in Parliament, along with that of Wilkes the politicians and writers who took the side of Wilkes generally also sympathising with the resistance of the American Colonists to the Home Government, while the Court party, who opposed Wilkes, were also eager for maintaining the prerogative of Britain over the Colonies. Things had come to such a pass that many shrewd persons foresaw a war with the Colonies, and prophesied their separation from the mother-country. It was the fear of this result that prompted the administration of Lord North, in the beginning of 1770, to repeal so much of the Act of 1767 as imposed duties on glass, paper, and painters' colours, retaining only the duty on tea. As, by such an arrangement, the obnoxious principle, to which the Americans were repugnant, was still maintained and asserted, there was little doubt that it would prove of no avail. But, before news could arrive of the manner in which the Americans had received it, a piece of intelligence crossed the Atlantic which increased the bitterness of the ministerial feeling against the intractable folk TOWN TALK LONG AGO 145 on the other side of the water. On the 26th of April, Chatterton's first day in London, there appeared in the London evening papers paragraphs conveying the news of a serious riot which had occurred in the streets of Boston on the I3th of March. The riot had originated in a quarrel between some of the soldiers who had been quartered in the town greatly against the wishes of the inhabitants and the men at a rope-manufactory belonging to a Mr. Gray. The people of Boston, highly incensed against the military both on account of their in- solent behaviour and because they had been sent among them to enforce the odious Tax Act, took part with the rope-makers. There was a violent disturbance of the peace ; the troops fired on the people, and some unoffending persons were killed ; the whole town rose ; and, to prevent still worse results, the military commander had to withdraw the soldiers to some distance. ' Had they not been withdrawn/ said a private letter from Boston, which appeared in the London Morning Post, 'the Bostonians would have set fire to their beacon, a tar-barrel stuck on the top of a mast on a high hill, and raised the country for eighty miles round.' Such was the news which the American post brought to London on the day when Chattcrton K 146 CHATTERTON began his residence in Shoreditch. For a week, or more, the town was full of it, the Wilkes party rejoicing over it as a new embarrassment to Minis- ters, and the Ministers themselves not knowing very well what to say or think about it. From that time a war with the Colonies seemed a probable event. In addition to the protracted Wilkes controversy, and to this matter of the Boston riot and its con- nection with colonial policy, there were, of course, a variety of minor incidents, of more or less interest, affording materials for gossip to the town during the first five or six weeks of Chatterton's sojourn in it. At that time, as in this, there were balls, horse- races, theatrical performances, murders, robberies, marriages in high life, fires, etc., all duly an- nounced in the public papers, and all excellent pabulum, for the conversation of the idle and the curious. By way of sample, and that readers may the more easily fill out the picture for themselves, there may be here strung together a few of those defunct minutice, gathered quite miscellaneously from the columns of the contemporary London news- papers : Wednesday, April 25 (day of Chatterton's arrival in London) 'Ranelagh House will be opened this evening TOWN TALK LONG AGO 147 with the usual entertainments. Admittance, 23. 6d. each person ; coffee and tea included. The house will continue to be open on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays till farther notice. N.B. There will be an armed guard on horseback to patrol the roads.' Advertisement in Public Advertiser of that day. Same evening. At Drury-lane, the following perform- ances : The Clandestine Marriage. Lord Ogleby, by Mr. Dibdin ; Miss Sterling, by Miss Pope. After which, The Padlock, a musical piece. Benefit of Mr. Dibdin. Same day. A levee at St. James's. Thursday, April 26 (Chatterton's first day in London, and day of the arrival of the news of the Boston Riot). A masquerade at the Opera House, given by the club at Arthur's : present more than 1,200 of the nobility, ambassadors, etc. Same day. A bill of indictment found at Hicks's Hall against the author or editor of the Whisperer, one of the fiercest of the anti-ministerial periodicals. Warrant for his apprehension issued on the 28th. Same evening. At Drury-lane, The Beggar's Opera, with The Minor. Mr. Bannister's benefit. Monday, April 30 (fifth day of Chatterton in London). At Covent-Garden, Addison's tragedy of Cato revived, with The Rape of Proserpine. Wednesday, May 2 (Chatterton a week in London). At Drury-lane, Hamlet the part of Hamlet by Garrick; after which, Queen Mab. Benefit night of Signor Grimaldi, Mr. Messenk, and Signor Giorgi. Monday, May 7 (the day on which, as above stated, a crowd gathered at the door of the House of Commons on the false news that Wilkes was to go to the House and claim his seat). 'Rumour that a lady of high quality would appear that evening at the Soho Masquerade in the 148 CHATTERTON character of an Indian princess, most superbly dressed, and with pearls and diamonds to the price of ^100,000. ; her train to be supported by three black young female slaves, and a canopy to be held over her head by two black male slaves. To be a fine sight.' Wednesday, May 16. 'Thirteen convicts executed together at Tyburn, conveyed in five carts ; mostly boys, the eldest not being more than twenty-two years of age. Some of them were greatly affected; others appeared hardened.' Saturday, May 19. Parliament prorogued, as stated above. Wednesday, May 23. The famous interview of the City deputation with the King at which Beckford made the speech quoted above. Saturday, May 26. Drury-lane season closed. Monday, May 28. Covent-garden Theatre closed for the season. Same day. 'At two o'clock, A.M., a fire at the house of Messrs. Webb and Fry, paper-stainers, Holborn-hill, near the end of Shoe Lane : four persons burnt to death.' Same day. One of ' Junius's ' letters in the Public Advertiser, containing a view of the state of the country, and a cutting criticism of the conduct of Ministers during the session just closed. Only two acknowledged letters of ' Junius ' appeared during the period of Chatterton's resid- ence in London, and this was one of them. Wednesday, May 30. 'News arrived that a French East Indian ship had reached Toulon, bringing word of a dreadful earthquake at St. Helena, which had entirely sunk the island in the sea.' Gentleman' sMagazine. Thursday, May 31. Foundation-stone of Newgate Prison laid by the Lord Mayor Beckford. All April and May. Advertisements of goods, sales, quack medicines, and new books in the newspapers ; also TOWN TALK LONG AGO 149 paragraphs innumerable on the case of Matthew and Patrick Kennedy, two brothers, who had been tried and condemned to death for the murder of John Bigby, a watch- man, but who had obtained a free pardon through the influence of their sister Miss Kennedy, a woman of peculiar reputation, and said to be intimate with some high men at Court. An appeal was laid against this settlement of the matter, and a new trial appointed, much to the gratification of the anti-Court party; but, Bigby's widow having got ,380 to keep out of the way, the trial fell to the ground, and the brothers escaped. It was into the midst of such incidents of these, episodic as they were to the two great topics of Wilkes and the Constitution and the growing dis- affection of the American Colonies, that Chatterton had transferred himself by his removal from Bristol to London. With some of the little incidents mentioned he may even have come into direct personal contact. If he did not go to see Addison's tragedy of Cato at Covent Garden on the 3Oth of April, it is not likely that he missed the opportunity of seeing Garrick in Hamlet at Drury Lane on the 2nd of May. If the 'fine sight' of the lady of high quality with the hundred thousand pounds' worth of jewels about her, and the three young negresses supporting her train, did not tempt him to the vicinity of the Soho Masquerade on the evening of the /th of May, it is not at all improbable that he formed one of ISO CHATTERTON the crowd that gathered round the door of the House of Commons that evening on the false expectation of seeing Wilkes come to make a scene and get himself committed to custody by the Speaker. Even at the distance of Shoreditch the rumour of the thirteen boys hanged at Tyburn on the morning of the i6th of May must have reached him ; for, common as hangings were then, such an occurrence was sufficiently unusual to make some commotion through all London. The prorogation of Parliament on the ipth of the same month would be a matter to interest him ; much more the royal audience given to the City deputation on the 23rd, and Beckford's famous speech. Shoe Lane being one of his haunts, the charred ruins of the premises of Messrs. Webb and Fry may possibly have attracted his notice on the 28th or 29th of May as he passed along Holborn ; and, a daily frequenter as he was of the coffee-houses where the newspapers were to be seen, he is sure to have been one of the earliest and most eager readers of the Public Advertiser containing Junius's powerful letter of May the 28th. Nor is all this mere conjecture. Not only do we know it as a fact that it was part of Chatterton's ambition in coming to London to work himself into TOWN TALK LONG AGO 151 connection with the prominent men and interests of the day, and, above all, with the notable personages of the Wilkes party ; we also know it as a fact that, to some small extent at least, he succeeded in doing so. The evidence of this will be produced in the next chapter. CHAPTER III SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE CHATTERTON'S London life forms the subject of a brief French romance from the pen of Alfred de Vigny. In that writer's pleasing volume of fiction entitled Stella, Chatterton is introduced as the real hero in the story of a so-called Kitty Bell. Kitty Bell is a young married woman who keeps a pastrycook's shop in the neighbourhood of the Houses of Parlia- ment. Her cakes and confections are celebrated far and wide ; and, partly from this cause, partly from Kitty's own attractiveness, her shop has become a habitual lounge of the legislators of Great Britain as they pass to and from their duties in St. Stephen's. Kitty, however, is as virtuous as she is pretty ; and, though her husband is a sulky brute, and the young lords and members of Parlia- ment are very assiduous in buying cakes from her fair fingers, nothing amiss can be said of her. There 152 SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE 153 is one figure, indeed, occasionally seen hovering about the shop, the apparition of which invariably discomposes her, especially when her husband is near. This turns out to be Chatterton, who, having come to London to push his fortune, has, in order to be near the Houses of Parliament, taken a lodging in Kitty Bell's house. Kitty, with her womanly tact, has contrived to dive into her mysterious lodger's secret. She has ascertained that he is a young man of genius, engaged in the hopeless task of establishing a connection with the public men of the day by means of literary service, and in the meantime without a penny in his pocket. She does all, in the circumstances, that fear of her brute of a husband will permit. She supplies her lodger furtively with tarts ; she screens from her husband the fact that he is unable to pay his rent for the garret he occupies ; and, in short, through pity and interest, she falls most foolishly in love with him. Sustained by her kindness and encouragement, Chatterton perseveres in his enterprise ; he gets acquainted with the Lord Mayor Beckford, and is led to conceive great hopes from promise of his patronage. Beckford, accordingly, calls one day at Kitty Bell's shop, and, by way of fulfilling his promise, offers to make Chatterton his footman ! 154 CHATTERTON Then comes the catastrophe. Chatterton, in despair, commits suicide ; and poor Kitty Bell is left to serve out cakes and comfits to the British Legislature with a heart no more. A very pretty story this ; with, unfortunately, but one objection to it that it is not true ! The true story of Chatterton's London life, one would suppose, is to be preferred to a false one ; and, as the materials for the true story were accessible to Alfred de Vigny in Chatterton's own letters, it is a pity that he was so fond of fiction as not to pay attention to them. Instead of going to lodge at Kitty Bell's, or at any other conceivable pastry- cook's in Westminster, Chatterton, as we know, had gone to lodge at a plasterer's in Shoreditch ; and, if Providence was so kind as to supply him with a fair consoler living under the same roof, this, as we also know, can possibly, in the first stage of his London career, have been no other than the motherly Mrs. Ballance, or, at best, that hussy, the landlady's niece, to whom he 'used sometimes to be saucy.' And so with the rest of the facts. The real progress of Chatterton's endeavours to make himself known the real extent of his success in working himself, from his centre in Shoreditch, into connection with the metropolitan men and interests of the day, as SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE 155 they have been summarily described in the last chapter are to be gathered, so far as they can be gathered at all, from his own letters. Chatterton's second letter to his mother was written on the 6th of May, or after he had been exactly ten days in London. It is as follows SHOREDITCH, LONDON: May 6, 1770. 'DEAR MOTHER, I am surprised that no letter has been sent in answer to my last. I am settled, and in such a settlement as I would desire. I get four guineas a month by one magazine ; shall engage to write a History of England and other pieces, which will more than double that sum. Occasional essays for the daily papers would more than support me. What a glorious prospect ! Mr. Wilkes knew me by my writings since I first corresponded with the booksellers here. I shall visit him next week, and by his interest will ensure Mrs. Ballance the Trinity House. He affirmed that what Mr. Fell had of mine could not be the writings of a youth, and expressed a desire to know the author. By the means of another bookseller, I shall be introduced to Townshend and Sawbridge. I am quite familiar at the Chapter Coffee- house, and know all the geniuses there. A character is now unnecessary ; an author carries his character in his pen. My sister will improve herself in drawing. My grandmother is, I hope, well. Bristol's mercenary walls were never destined to hold me ; there I was out of my element ; now I am in it. London ! good God ! how superior is London to that despicable place Bristol ! Here is none of your little meannesses, none of your mercenary securities, which disgrace that miserable hamlet. Dress, which is in Bristol an eternal fund of scandal, is here only 156 CHATTERTON introduced as a subject of praise : if a man dresses well, he has taste; if careless, he has his own reasons for so doing, and is prudent. Need I remind you of the con- trast ? The poverty of authors is a common observation, but not always a true one. No author can be poor who understands the arts of booksellers : without this necessary knowledge the greatest genius may starve, and with it the greatest dunce live in splendour. This knowledge I have pretty well dipped into. The Levant man-of-war, in which T. Wensley went out, is at Portsmouth ; but no news of him yet. I lodge in one of Mr. Walmsley's best rooms. Let Mr. Gary copy the letters on the other side, and give them to the persons for whom they are designed, if not too much labour for him. I remain yours, etc. 'T. CHATTERTON.' 'P.S. I have some trifling presents for my mother, sister, Thome, etc.' [Here follow the letters to various Bristol acquaint- ances, which Mr. Gary was to copy out and give them] ' Mr. T. Cary. I have sent you a task I hope no unpleasing one. Tell all your acquaintances for the future to read the Freeholder's Magazine. When you have anything for publication, send it to me, and it shall most certainly appear in some periodical compilation. Your last piece was, by the ignorance of a corrector, jumbled under the " considerations " in the acknowledgements ; but I rescued it, and insisted on its appearance. Your friend, < T. C.' ' Direct for me, to be left at the Chapter Coffee-house, Paternoster Row.' 'Mr. Henry Kator. If you have not forgot Lady Betty, any complaint, rebus, or enigma, on the dear charmer, SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE 157 directed for me, to be left at the Chapter Coffee-house, Paternoster Row, shall find a place in some magazine or other, as I am engaged in many. Your friend, 'T. CHATTERTON.' ' Mr. Wm. Smith. When you have any poetry for publication, send it to me, to be left at the Chapter Coffee- house, Paternoster Row, and it shall most certainly appear. Your friend, T. C.' ' Mrs. Baker. The sooner I see you the better. Send me, as soon as possible, Rymsdyk's address. (Mr. Gary will leave this at Mr. Flower's, Small-street).' ' Mr. Mason. Give me a short prose description of the situation of Nash ; and the poetic addition shall appear in some magazine. Send me also whatever you would have published, and direct for me, to be left at the Chapter Coffee-house, Paternoster Row. Your friend, 'T. CHATTERTON.' ' Mr. Matthew Mease. Begging Mr. Mease's pardon for making public use of his name lately, I hope he will remember me, and tell all his acquaintances to read the Freeholder's Magazine for the future. 'T. CHATTERTON.' c Tell Mr. Thaire, Mr. Caster, Mr. A. Broughton, Mr. J. Broughton, Mr. Williams, Mr. Rudhall, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Carty, Mr. Hanmor, Mr. Vaughan, Mr. Ward, Mr. Kalo, Mr. Smith, etc., to read the Freeholder's Magazine? This is certainly pretty well after only ten days in London. We fear, indeed, that there is a good deal of bragging in the letter, intended to convey to his 158 CHATTERTON Bristol acquaintances a more favourable impression of the progress he had already made in the great metropolis than the facts, as known to himself, exactly warranted. Still it is evident that Chatter- ton, when he wrote the letter, was in high spirits. Reducing the expressions of the letter to the real substance of fact on which they may have been founded, we should be inclined to say that the information here given respecting the extent of Chatterton's success in introducing himself to notice during his first ten days in London amounts to something like this : Being a youth of prepossessing appearance and address, and having, as we know, a sufficiently good opinion of himself to prevent any of that awkwardness in meeting strangers which arises from excessive modesty, he had made the best use he could of the slight hold he had on Fell, Hamilton, Edmunds, and Dodsley. He had gone to their places of business, perhaps oftener than they cared to see him ; he had talked with them, made pro- posals of literary assistance to them, compelled them into saying something that could be construed as encouragement; he had got from them hints as to other quarters to which he might apply ; he had, probably by their advice, turned his hopes towards SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE 159 the great book-mart of Paternoster Row, where all sorts of speculations he might help in were going on ; and he had thus at last found himself referred to that celebrated place of resort for the booksellers of the day and their literary workmen, the Chapter Coffee-house. Mr. Peter Cunningham, in his Hand- book of London, has provided us with an extract respecting this once famous rendezvous, which will serve to give us a more distinct idea of it as it was in Chatterton's time. ' And here my publisher would not forgive me, was I to leave the neighbourhood without taking notice of the Chapter Coffee-house, which is frequented by those encouragers of literature and (as they are styled by an eminent critic) ' not the worst judges of merit,' the book- sellers. The conversation here naturally turns upon the newest publications; but their criticisms are somewhat singular. When they say a good book, they do not mean to praise the style or sentiment, but the quick and exten- sive sale of it. That book is best which sells most ; and, if the demand for Quarles should be greater than for Pope, he would have the highest place on the rubric-post.' The Connoisseur, No. i, Jan. 3ist, 1754. Here, then, among the talking groups of booksellers we are to fancy Chatterton a daily visitor during the first week or two of his stay in town reading the newspapers, listening to the conversation, getting acquainted with the 'geniuses' of the place, and 160 CHATTERTON giving very small orders to the waiters. The Chapter Coffee-house was evidently a great place in his eyes, and every shilling spent in it he probably regarded as a good investment. All his Bristol friends were to address their letters to him there, and not to Shoreditch. More particularly, however, Chatterton's hopes at the period of his first settlement in London seem to have rested on the intimacy he had struck up with Mr. Fell. We have already given our impression of this personage, representing him as a gentleman in pecuniary difficulties, connected with Wilkes, and employing his broken energies, and the capital of other people, in the publication of the Freeholder's Magazine. His reception of Chatterton, we said, appears to have been, and this probably from the state of his own circumstances, more frank and cordial than that of any other of the booksellers Chatterton had called upon. A kind of understanding seems, indeed, to have been at once established between them. On the one hand, Chatterton was to have the pages of the Freeholder's Magazine thrown open to him ; on the other hand, Fell, to whom the service of a clever contributor on any other terms than those of hard cash was probably a convenience, was willing to remunerate his young friend with plenty of SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE 161 promises, and in the meantime with the benefits of his advice and countenance, and as much praise as he liked. The prospect of being introduced to Wilkes was the most attractive bait that could be held out to Chatterton ; and we greatly fear Fell made the most of the fact. ' I assure you, Mr. Chatterton, Mr. Wilkes has a high opinion of you ; he has more than once asked me about writings of yours ; and, when I told him that you were not eighteen, "Upon my soul I don't believe it, Mr. Fell," said he ; " so young a man could not write like that": these were his very words.' Such, as we infer from Chatterton's own account, was the sub- stance of much of his conversation with Fell. How much of sincerity there was in Fell's farther promise, that he would introduce Chatterton to Wilkes, one can hardly say. There is certainly some bragging in the manner in which Chatterton an- nounces to his mother the promised introduction : ' I shall visit him (Wilkes) next week, and by his interest, will ensure Mrs Ballance the Trinity House ' (i.e. the charitable allowance granted out of the funds of this foundation to the widows of deserving seamen). Chatterton had shrewdness enough, with all his inexperience and his good opinion of himself, to know that he was putting a little strain on the L 162 CHATTERTON truth here. So also, probably, in the matter of the proposed introductions to the two popular aldermen, Townshend and Sawbridge. Still it is evident that he had some trust in Fell. To read the Freeholder's Magazine, and to address letters to him at the Chapter Coffee-house in Paternoster Row, were his two injunctions to his friends at home after he had been ten days in London. What came of the connection so rapidly formed with Fell and the Freeholder's Magazine will be seen from Chatterton's next letter. It is to his mother ' KING'S BENCH, for the present : May 14, 1770 ' DEAR MADAM, Don't be surprised at the name of the place. I am not here as a prisoner. Matters go on swimmingly. Mr. Fell having offended certain persons, they have set his creditors upon him, and he is safe in the King's Bench. I have been bettered by this accident : his successors in the Freeholder's Magazine, knowing nothing of the matter, will be glad to engage me on my own terms. Mr. Edmunds has been tried before the House of Lords, sentenced to pay a fine, and thrown into Newgate. His misfortunes will be to me of no little service. Last week, being in the pit of Drury Lane Theatre [it might have been to see Garrick again], I contracted an immediate acquaintance (which you know is no hard task to me) with a young gentleman in Cheapside, partner in a music-shop, the greatest in the city. Hearing I could write, he desired me to write a few songs for him : this I did the same night, SETTING THE THAMES ON FIRE 163 and conveyed them to him the next morning. These he showed to a Doctor in music, and I am invited to treat with the Doctor, on the footing of a composer for Ranelagh and the Gardens. Bravo, h