ITVITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION UC-NRLF 3 lib M2M Dyes and Other Coal -Tar H F Chemicals REPORT TO CONGRESS Recommending amendments to Title V of Act of September 8, 1916 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1918 Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2008 witii funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation littp://www.arcliive.org/details/dyesotliercoaltarOOunitricli UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION WASHINGTON Dyes and Other Coal -Tar Chemicals REPORT TO CONGRESS Recommending amendments to Title V of Act of September 8, 1916 WASHINGTON (ioVIJKNMi-INT PBINTING OFFICE 1918 UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION. Office: 1322 New York Avenue. Washington, D. C. Gummissioners : V. W. TAUSSIG, Chairman. THOMAS WALKER PAGE, Vice Chairman. DAVID J. LEWIS. WILLIAM KENT. WILLIAM S. CULBERTSON. EDWARD P. COSTIGAN. William M. Stedart, Secretary. In the preparation of this report the commission has had the services of Dr. Grinnell Jones, chemical expert, and also the assist- ance of Dr. E. R. Pickrell, of the Customs Service. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. United States Tariff Commission, Washington, December 12, 1918. The Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives : I have the honor to transmit herewith a report by the United States Tariff Commission on dyes and other coal-tar chemicals. Very respectfully, F. W. Taussig, Chairman. (3) 393187 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal 8 Introduction 7 Special Report to CJongress recommending Amendments to Title V of the act of September 8, 1916 ' 11 Draft of a Bill to Amend Title V of act of September 8, 1916 23 Text of Title V of the act of September 8, 1916 29 Text of Title V of the act of September 8, 1916, edited to show Proposed Amendments 33 Detailed Technical Discussion of Reasons for the Proposed Amendments- 89 Decisions upon Classification under Title V of the act of September 8, 1916 65 (5) INTRODUCTION. This report, issued as one among the publications of the United States Tariff Commission on industries affected by the tariff, is divided into six parts. First. A statement to Congress recommending amendments to Title V of the act of September 8, 1916. In this statement possible evasions of the intent of the law and difficulties in certain administrative fea- tures are explained. Second. A draft of a bill to amend Title V of the act of September 8, 1916. This proposed bill is designed to prevent evasions which are possible under the act of September 8, 1916. Third. Text of Title V of the act of September 8, 1916. Fourth. Text of Title V of the act of September 8, 1916, edited to show proposed amendments. Fifth. Detailed technical discussion of reasons for the proposed amendments. Sixth. Decisions of the Treasury Department, United States Board of General Appraisers and the United States Court of Customs Appeals upon classifications under Title V of the act of September 8, 1916. (7) REPORT TO CONGRESS, RECOMMENDING AMEND- MENTS TO TITLE V OF THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1916 (0) DYES AND OTHER COALTAR CHEMICALS. EEPORT TO CONGRESS RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE V OF THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1916. The Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives: The industrial emergency created by the war has resulted in a remarkable development of the chemical industries of the United States. Fundamental changes have occurred which will have a per- manent influence on the conditions of international competition. From the viewpoint of those interested in tariff problems, no branch of this development is of more importance than that which has affected the coal-tar industries. The manufacture of coal-tar dye- stuffs, medicinals, and photographic chemicals was of little signifi- cance in the United States before the war. Three-fourths of the world's supply of coal-tar dyes was produced in Germany, and Ger- man interests controlled one or more of the essential materials for at least half of the dyes manufactured outside of German territory. Switzerland, the producer of second importance, depended upon Ger- man sources for her coal tar and for many other necessary chemicals. Further, Great Britain, France, the United States, Austria, and Eussia resorted largely to German materials for the small fraction which they manufactured for their own consumption. In general they offered little competition to the great German industry. The same situation prevailed in the closely related field of coal-tar medicinals, where Germany maintained an even more formidable position. German investigators were the first to synthesize some of the most important drugs known to medicine, and their products were so protected by patents and trade-marks and by the control of raw materials that*^there was little possibility for the manufacture of these products in the United States. One of the effects of the outbreak of the European war was an acute shortage of dyes in this country. At the earnest request of representatives of the textile industry Congress in 1916 passed a law raising the duties on dyestuffs and other closely related products de- rived from coal tar, including intermediates, photographic chemicals, medicinals. flavors, synthetic phenolic resins, and explosives. The act of September 8, 1916, has in a large measure accomplished its purpose of encouraging the investment of capital in the dye industry m the United States. American chemists and business men have met the emergency with conspicuous success by the creation of a new industry. The American wool, cotton, and silk mills during 1917 produced a larger volume of goods than ever before in their history. The dyes needed were supplied by the new American dyestuff indus- try, with relatively small aid from Switzerland. So great has been (11) 12 the advance that the export of American dyes has surpassed in value, although not in tonnage nor in variety, the annual imports into the United States before the war. There has also been a corresponding development of other branches of the coal-tar products industry, especially in the manufacture of medicinals and photographic chemicals. Although the law has been successful in its main purpose, it has become clear that it is not so worded as to give effect completely and perfectly to the presumable intent of Congress. The commis- sion begs to bring to the attention of Congress some difficulties of interpretation, some administrative difficulties, and also some ques- tions of policy. Administrative difficulties and recommendations thereon. — After a careful study of the phraseology and probable working of the pres- ent law, as well as of the development of the industries of the United States, the commission concludes that there are several ways in which the presumable intent of Congress can be evaded. (1) One possibility of evasion arises from the fact that the act of 1916 does not repeal specifically rates of duty in the old law which are in conflict with the intent of the new. It is true that the act of 1916 contains a provision that " so much of said act of 1913 or any existing law or parts of law as may be inconsistent with this title are hereby repealed." But the enumeration of certain specific com- modities m the act of 1916 and the failure to enumerate others spe- cifically, opens the possibility of a construction of the act of 1916 probably not contemplated Dy Congress. The case of salol fur- nishes an example. Paragraph 18 of the act of 1913 imposes a duty of 25 per cent ad valorem on salol, which is mentioned by name in this paragraph. The act of 1916 imposes a duty of 30 per cent on " medicinals * * * when obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from any of the products provided for in Groups I and II." The article salol is such a medicinal and presumably was expected to be included in the class of medicinals described in these general terms. In actual practice, however, the customs authorities have continued to classify salol under paragraph 18 of the act of 1913, this being deemed the more specific provision. Other similar cases could be cited. Special attention should per- haps be called to saccharin and sodium benzoate, which (like salol) are medicinals derived from coal tar and are described in general terms in the act of 1916, but are also specifically mentioned in the act of 1913, and are there subjected to specific duties — 65 cents per pound in the case of saccharin (par. 179) and 5 cents per pound in the case of sodium benzoate (par. 67). They differ from salol in that they are used not only as medicinals, but for other purposes also. Saccmirin is used chiefly as a flavor for chewing tobacco, and is therefore within the general terms of the provision in the act of 1916 for " flavors * * * obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from any of the products provided for in Groups I and 11." Sodium benzoate, though used as a medicinal, is chiefly a preserva- tive for food. It is made from benzoic acid, which is mentioned by name in the act of 1916 and there made dutiable at a much higher rate (15 per cent plus 2^ cents per pound) than the duty of 5 cents per pound (under the act of 1913) on sodium benzoate. This ere- 13 ates an anomalous relationship between the raw material (benzoic ncid) and the finished product made therefrom (sodium benzoate). Both saccharin and sodium benzoate are from a manufacturing and commercial point of view closely allied to the articles covered by Group III of the act of 1916. We therefore suggest that they should be specifically mentioned in Group III and that the specific provisions for them in the act of 1913 be repealed. The effect would be to raise the rate of duty in the case of sodium benzoate and probably to lower it in the case of saccharin. The pres- ent price of saccharin (about $9 per pound) is many times the nor- mal, owing to the fact that it is made from toluol, which is very important for the manufacture of explosives and not available in amounts approaching the need. At the prices which prevailed be- fore the war (70 cents to $1.50 per pound) and which are likely to prevail again, the proposed change represents a reduction in the duty. The ad valorem equivalent of the specific duty of 65 cents per pound on saccharin varied before the war from 96 per cent in 1911 to 47.7 per cent in 1913. Numerous other similar cases have been found of articles which Congress presumably intended to cover by the act of 1916, but which, in actual practice, are still being classified under the act of 1913, in- cluding the following articles in addition to those already discussed. (a) Phenolphthalein, acetanilid, acetphenetidin,antipyrine,acetyl- salicylic acid, and aspirin, which are now being classified under para- graph 18. (b) Coumarin, which is now classified under paragraph 5. (c) Explosives derived from coal tar, such as trinitrotoluol, now classified under paragraph 501. (2) Another possibility of evasion arises from the circumstance that certain commodities classed as intermediates, which in the act of 1916 are in Group II and are subject to a duty of 15 per cent ad valorem and 2^ cents a pound, are transformable into finished prod- ucts at very slight expense and by very simple processes. There are, for example, certain intermediates called leuco acids and leuco bases (i. e., colorless compounds), which are not strictly dyes, yet have been carried in the process of manufacture to a point where only an insig- nificant and inexpensive operation is needed to convert them into dyes. Under the act of 1916 they will inevitably be imported in the leuco state — not quite finished as dyes, but very nearly finished; they will then be converted into dyes within this country, cheaply and easily. They will be imported at the intermediate duty of 15 per cent plus 2^ cents, and yet will compete directly with completed dyes of domestic manufacture. A striking instance is that of indoxyl, an intermediate which is in the last stage in the succession of processes by which synthetic indigo is obtained. Indoxyl is a colorless sub- stance, not a dye, but by the mere process of dissolving it in water and blowing air (oxygen) through it, the last chemical step in the production of synthetic indigo is completed, and the commercial indigo is produced. Indoxyl is dutiable under the present act as an intermediate ; indigo is dutiable as a dye. It is more than probable that under the terms of the present act importation will take the form of indoxyl : and this will be virtually the importation of indigo, com- peting with indigo of domestic manufacture. 14 Another potential evasion is through the importation of dyes as " ink powders," under paragi-aph 37. Synthetic methyl salicylate, derived from coal tar, resembles the natural oil of wintergreen so closely that it can be fraudulently in- voiced as oil of wintergreen, and can thereby be imported at a lower rate of duty under paragraph 46. There appears to be no sure safe- guard against the importation of mixtures of the articles provided for in Group II or Group III under paragraph 5. In the case of certain distillates derived from coal tar an unsuit- able specification has resulted in placing upon the dutiable list much material which Congress probably intended to be imported free. This difficulty can be overcome by changing the temperature men- tioned in the specification which distinguishes between dutiable and free distillation from 200° to 190° C. (3) A third possibility of evasion, or if not evasion, of unex- pected complication, arises from the circumstance that dyes as ordi- narily dealt with in commerce are in most cases not dyes in a chem- ically pure form, but are weakened or reduced in strength by mixing with water, salts, or other diluent. Synthetic indigo, for instance, is ordinarily sold in the form of a paste, containing 20 per cent of pure indigo and 80 per cent of inert matter, chiefly water. In the case of other dyes also, including most of the important ones, there is a recognized standard commercial strength. Prices are habitually quoted on the basis of this usual strength. In the case of still other dyes, however, there is no recognized commercial strength. The duty of 5 cents per pound, imposed by the act of 1916, was pre- sumably intended to apply to the dyes in their usual commercial strength, and not to the pure forms which ordinarily are unknown in commerce. The wording was, however, not so framed as to insure this. Under the present wording of the law the duty is levied and apparently must be levied, on the weight of the dye as imported, regardless of its concentration or strength. This permits dyes to be imported in a pure state or at least a highly concentrated state and then to be reduced to the usual commercial strength after having passed through the customhouse. The effective duty is consequently much lower than was presumably intended. This situation, however, can not be dealt with by any specific legislative prescription of the commercial or standard strength of the several dyes. In many cases, no trustworthy basis now exists for a definite standardization of commercial strength. Under these circumstances, the commission believes it best that discretion be given to the administrative department and that the Secretary of the Treasury be authorized to determine from time to time Avhat is the dutiable strength of the several dyes, with discretion to make changes in accord with gradually ascertained and tested commer- cial practice. Discretionary power of this sort will enable experts to recommend to the Secretary of the Treasury standards of strength conforming approximately to commercial usage, with the possi- bility of modifying them as experience might indicate. This mode of dealing with the situation would be facilitated by requiring a statement on all imported packages of the exact constitu- ents and strength of clyestufFs contained therein. Such a statement would make easier the accurate appraisal of imports of dyes for the 15 ad valorem duty. Appraisal is exceptionally diflficult owing to the difficulty of identification and variability in strength. The require- ment would serve further as a guarantee to purchasers of the identity and strength of the dyestuffs which they were buying. The com- mission is satisfied that there has been much dishonesty in the dye- stutl's trade, and that something analogous to the provision of the pure food laws in regard to misbranding would be of great ad- vantage. It is accordingly recommended, both as an aid in adrnin- istering the law and as a safeguard for purchasers, that every im- ported package shall contain a specific statement showing the con- stituents and strength of the contents. Proportion of domestic produrtion and imports. — Difficulties of administration and also some difficult questions of policy arise in connection w^ith that clause of the act of 1916 which reads as follows : If. at the expiration of five years from the date of tlie passage of this act, the President finds that there is not beins mannfactured or produced within the United States as nnich as sixty per centum in value of the domestic consump- tion of the articles mentioned in Groups II and III of section 500, he shall, by proclamation, so declare, whereupon the special duties imposed by this section on such articles shall no longer be assessed, levied, or collec^ted. The President has requested the Tariff Commission to ascertain the facts upon which Executive action can be based. The commission accordingly has taken a census of the production during 1917 of dye- stuffs and other coal-tar products covered by the law, and is prepared to continue the taking of such a census from year to year hereafter. A report stating the results of this census has been published. The inquiries upon which it is based have, however, indicated some diffi- culties to which the commission now invites attention. The determination of production in the United States is entirely feasible. That of total domestic consumption, however, is not so. It would seem impracticable to secure statistical returns direct from every consumer. The alternative is to define consumption as the sales of the American manufacturers plus imports, exports being then de- ducted. But this procedure involves many difficulties. Export sta- tistics are not available in sufficient detail. It is doubtful whether they could be secured in the detail and with the accuracy^ needed. Even more difficult is the ascertainment of the value of imports. Statistics in terms of physical quantities (tons or pounds) are obvi- ously not significant for the purpose in hand, since the commodities are immensely variable in quality and value. The only significant comparison is one in terms of value. But the value of the imports, for proper comparison with the domestic production, is extremely difficult to secure in terms comparable to the value of domestic out- put. The values recorded in the import statistics are foreign market values. These must be converted into terms of consumption values in order to be comparable with the values of domestic products con- sumed. The importers sell the commodities not on the basis of for- eign values, but, of course, add the import duty and also a profit, which varies enormously for the different articles. Some sales are made direct to manufacturer's, some to jobbers, and some to retail dealers, with different terms in the several cases. An accurate valua- tion of the " consumption " of the imported articles thus becomes a highly complicated matter. 16 Moreover, the language of the clause is not entirely clear. It might be interpreted to mean that each article mentioned by name in Group II and each class of articles mentioned in Group III is to be consid- ered separately and that each article or class is to be dealt with sepa- rately. Under such an interpretation it might result, for example, that 60 per cent of the domestic consumption of aniline (an inter- mediate) is being made in the United States, and that, therefore, aniline would remain subject to the specific duty; whereas other in- termediates produced and derived from aniline might not be subject to the specific duty. Unexpected and undesirable maladjustments would arise in the relation of duty between different raw materials and between raw materials and finished products. Another interpretation of this clause would be to consider Group II, intermediates, as one unit, and Group III, finished products, as a separate unit. If so interpreted, it is probable that the act would be least difficult of administration; yet it is doubtful whether its lan- guage would justify this interpretation. Still another way to interpret the language would be to treat Groups II and III as one whole, adding the total production in the two classes and comparing this total with the total valuation of im- ports. This would seem a proper interpretation of the language of the act as it stands. It would, however, cause the articles in Group II to be virtually counted twice, or, in some cases, even four or five times. These articles (intermediates) are used in the manufacture of intermediates of a more advanced stage, and eventually in that of the finished articles in Group III, and form a constituent part of the value of the finished articles. To count them in Group II perhaps several times and again in valuing the commodities in Group III would be open to criticism. The commission recommends that if the clause is to be retained it be formulated in more precise terms by reckoning as the value of domestic production the total value of commodities belonging in Group III plus the value of commodities in Group II not used in the manufacture of the finished articles in Group III. There would remain, nevertheless, difficulties in administration of the clause so formulated, because of the difficulty of ascertaining which inter- mediates have been used in the production of finished commodities and which have not. The commission takes the liberty of suggesting to Congress the possibility of repealing entirely, for the present, this 60 per cent clause. In view of the changed conditions which have arisen since the entrance of the United States into the war, the clause may not appear to be so necessary a safeguard as it did at the time of its enactment. Speci-fic exemption considered. — In still another direction the com- mission suggests that there be further consideration, namely, as re- gards that clause in the act of 1916 which exempts certain finished dyestuffs, medicinals, and flavors from the specific duty of 5 cents a pound. Most articles in Group III are subject to a duty of 30 per cent ad valorem plus 5 cents a pound specific. Certain enumerated articles, however, are exempted from the specific (5 cents) duty. These are " natural and synthetic alizarin and dyes obtained from alizarin, anthracene, and carbazol, natural and synthetic indigo, and 17 all indi^tillijis' below two htindred degrees centigrade a quantity of tar acids equal to or more than five per centum of the original distillate. Immediately after the passage of the act it became necessary for the customs officers to define the term " cresol," which is on the free list. In scientific chemical nomenclature the name " cresol " is a group name including three chemical individuals known as orthocresol, metacresol. and paracresol, which are different chemically but very similar in most physical properties. In commerce the word '* cresol " is used as synonj^mous with cresylic acid and crude liquid carbolic acid, which are crude products derived from coal tar, consisting chiefly of the three cresols together with xylenols, naphthalene, and other hydrocarbons, and from which the phenol (crystal carbolic acid) has been separated as far as is commercialh" feasible. The definition of cresol adopted by the collector of customs at Xew York is a distillate derived from coal tar containing less than 5 per ce]\t of phenol and at least 50 per cent of the three isomeric cresols. In case a shipment was found on analysis to contain 5 per cent or more of phenol it was not classified as " cresol," but was classified as a "distillate" in Group I (free) or Group II (dutiable). With rare exceptions such a distillate would be dutiable, since if it con- tained more than 5 per cent of phenol it would also have more than .") per cent of tar acids in the portion distilling below 200° C. An- other difficulty is that no simple and accurate method for the analyti- cal determination of phenol in commercial cresol is known. The method used by the customs officials, although the best method which has yet been devised by chemists, is quite complic-ated and less accu- rate than most chemical analyses. The importers claimed that they were often unable to predict in advance whether any given shipment would be held dutiable or free. It soon developed that many shipments of material commercially known as cresol or cresylic acid oi- crude liquid carbolic acid con- 44 tained 5 per cent or more of phenol, and therefore could not be classified as cresol under this definition. An examination of Commerce and Navigation reports shows that the dutiable shipments in question are being entered in the import tables under the designation " liquid carbolic acid," a name some- times used synonymously in the trade for cresol or cresylic acid. Imports entered for consumption. Date. Sept. 8 to Sept. 30, 1916. Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, 1916.. Jan. 1 to Mar. 31, 1917.. Apr. 1 to June 30, 1917.. Total (fiscal year) July 1 to Sept. 30, 1917.. Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, 1917... Jan. 1 to Mar. 31, 1918... Apr. 1 to June 30, 1918.. Total (fiscal year) Cresol (free). Pounds. Value 3,945 360, 835 2, 352, 718 2,073,201 Liquid carbolic acid (dutiable). Pounds. Value. $353 21,872 154,488 153,025 20,816 154,612 82,406 16,550 329, 738 274,384 1,709,775 1,529,748 2,158,877 1,933,207 112,212 112,804 168, 135 153. 149 71,400 144,229 131,958 7,331,607 546,300 347,587 SI, 466 12,412 6,633 1,868 22,379 7,368 8,377 14,340 30,085 Duty. $740. 30 5,727.10 3,055.10 693. 95 10, 216. 45. 2,890.20^ 4,862.28 5,449.9& 13,202.43- The import statistics show that in the first few months after the passage of the act a considerable fraction of the total was held to be dutiable, i. e., it contained 5 per cent or more of phenol, whereas the later months show that foreign shippers and domestic importers have been able to adjust their methods of manufacture and specifications so that less than 5 per cent of the material has been held to be duti- able. The records of the appraisers' laboratory at the port of New York show that of 92 specimens examined up to November 2, 1917, 34 con- tained less than 5 per cent of phenol and were, therefore, classified as cresol against 58 specimens containing 5 per cent or more of phenol which were, therefore, classified as a dutiable distillate (liquid car- bolic acid). It is evident that this definition of cresol did not accord with com- mercial practice and created an undesirable situation. On August 9, 1918, this definition of cresol was overthrown by the Board of General Appraisers, which decided that the terms cresol, cresylic acid, and liquid carbolic acid are synonymous, and that a sample containing as much as 12.6 per cent of phenol should be clas- sified as " cresol " rather than as " all other distillates which on being subjected to distillation yield in the portion distilling below two hun- dred degrees centigrade a quantity of tar acids less than 5 per centum of the original distillate." This particular case has not been appealed by the Government, but it is possible that a new case will be made in order to bring this issue before the Court of Customs Appeals on a better record. This deci- sion, if allowed to stand, appears to remove the reasonable objections of the importers. There is now no authoritative decision of the maxi- mum amount of phenol which may be present in cresol without pre- venting free entry as "cresol." Normally phenol is removed from 45 cresol as completely as it is coniniercially feasible to do so, because the phenol is higher priced than cresol. If, however, phenol is duti- able, but cresol containins: large amounts of phenol may be imported as " cresol," it may prove profitable to import such " cresol " and make the separation in the Ignited States instead of abroad. This may make it possible lo evade the clearly manifested intention of Conirress to protect the new synthetic phenol industry. The remedy for this difKculity which is proposed in the accompany- ino- bill is to" eliminate the term "cresol" entirely from the law and also lower the temperature specified m the "all other distillates" clauses from 200° C. to 190° C. The boilinir point of phenol is 183° C, the boiling point of ortho- cresol is 191^' C.. of metacresol. 20-2° C and of paracre^ol, 202° C. It is evident that considerable orthocresol will distill at a tempera- ture of 200° C, and. therefore, the temperature specified in the law is too hiah to give eitect to the evident purpose of the law. The records of the'lippraisers' laboratory at New York show that of 58 specimens declared dutiable under the interpretation of the law. orginally adopted by the customs officers, but since overruled by the General Appraiser's, only 5 would have been declared dutiable under the pro- posed wordinir.'and all of these 5 specimens contained 12 per cent or more of phenol— an abnormally large amount. It would probably be commercially profitalile to recover phenol from a cresol containing 12 per cent or more of phenol. The proposed new wording will (1) permit the free importation of all specimens of commerciafcresy lie acid, except specimens contain- ing abnormally large amounts of phenol, which it would be profitable to'^remove: (2) make the decision as to whether any given shipment is free or dutiable dependent on a much simpler chemical analysis, and thus render it easily possible for an importer to know definitely in advance whether a shipment is dutiable or free, as well as reduce the work thrown on the appraisers' laboratory: (3) prevent any product from which phenol may be commercially recovered from be- ms admitted duty free. The proposed new wording will thus give effect to the evident intent of Congress in framing the act and at the same time eliminate unnecessary difficulties and friction in the en- forcement of the act. 6. Omit from the free list: "metacresol having a purity of less than ninety per centum." " orthocresol having a purity of less than ninety per centum," and " paracresol having a purity of less than ninety per centum." There is a possibility that under these clauses the intent of Con- gress to protect the American phenol industry could be evaded. A shipment consisting of GO per cent orthocresol and 40 per cent phenol might be classified as " orthocresol having a purity of less than 90 per cent," and the phenol readily recovered after it had passed the customhouse. The purified grades of cresol are retained in Group II. The effect of this change is that the purified grades will be dutia- ble under Group II in accordance with the presumable intent of Con- gress to encourage the refining and purification of these articles within the Ignited States, whereas, a sample not conforming to the standards of purity specified would be classified as a " distillate " in Group I or II according to its phenol content. 46 . 7. Add " cymene " to Group I after " cumol." The sulphite process of making wood pulp from spruce wood yields a by-product of an oil which consists essentially of a substance known as cymene. Cymene is closely allied in its chemical structure and behavior to benzol, toluol, xylol, and cumol, which are obtained from coal tar. A whole series of intermediates and dyes, entirely analogous to the products obtained from these coal-tar crudes, can be made trom cymene. For example, cymidin is made from cymene exactly as anilin is made from benzol, and jdelds a whole series of dyes closely resembling the dyes derived from anilin. They resemble anilin dyes in fastness and applicability and in all dyeing properties, except that they have a different shade, being, as a rule, redder than the corre- sponding anilin dyes. If these dyes are developed commercially they will necessarily be an integral part of the dye industry, both from a manufacturing and sell- ing point of view, and they will compete directly with the anilin dyes. There is some scientific evidence that cymene is contained in coal tar, but the evidence is not conclusive. In view of the fact that many closely related substances are known to be present in coal tar, there is a strong probability that this evidence could be corroborated and extended if a careful effort were made to find cymene in coal tar. It is, however, certain that if these cymene dyes are developed com- mercially the necessary raw material will be obtained from the wood- pulp mills of North America, Norway, and Sweden, rather than produced from coal tar. Are these dyes covered by the present tariff law? Many of them undoubtedly are, because they are made by combining or " coupling " a cymene intermediate with an intermediate of undoubted coal-tar origin, such as naphthol or H acid. But dyes can be made by using intermediates derived exclusively from cymene. Are these dyes covered ? The present law does not mention cymene or any of its derivatives by name, but contains in Group I the provision " all other products that are found naturally in coal tar, whether produced or obtained from coal tar or other source." If cymene is covered by this phrase, the intermediates and dyes made from it are dutiable under Group II and Group III. The customs officers would probably classify cymene dyes under Group III; and if the importers brought suit to secure a different classification, the issue would be whether or not cymene is " found naturally in coal tar, whether obtained from coal tar or other source." The decision would probably be that cymene dyes are covered by the present law, but all uncertainty can be easily and logically removed by adding the word " cymene *' after " cumol," in Group I. Group II. — Dutiable at 16 per centum/ plus 2^ cents per pound. 8. Add the restrictive phrase " not suitable for medicinal use " after benzaldehyde, benzoic acid, resorcin, and salicylic acid. These articles all appear in commerce in two grades — a pure grade, which conforms to the specifications of the United States Pharmacopoeia and is suitable for medicinal use, and a less pure grade, which is used as an intormcMliate for making dyes and other finished products. 47 The pure grades are mentioned by names under Group III with the restrictive clause "suitable for medicinal use." This amendment involves no change in the present practice, but is believed to clarify the present language, and therefore to facilitate the enforcement of the law. Phenol is also used as a medicinal and as an intermediate for the manufacture of dyes, drugs, and explosives (picric acid). In this case, however, the phenol commonly used as an intermediate is of a quality suitable for medicinal use: and since far more is used as an intermediate than directly as a medicinal, it seems that to leave it in Group II conforms best with the original intent of Congress. 9. Add " and its salts " after salicylic acid so that it reads "sali- cylic acid and its salts not suitable for medicinal use." ' Salts of salicylic acid can be used for the same purposes as the acid itself and appear in commerce in a medicinal and technical grade. 10. Add " acetanilid not suitable for medicinal use." Acetanilid, like the articles mentioned under No. 8, appears in commerce in two grades — medicinal and technical (used as an intermediate for making dyes). This case differs from the above, as acetanilid is mentioned by name in paragraph 18 of the act of 1913, which imposes a duty of 25 per cent on acetanilid without making any distinction between the two grades. The grade suitable for use as an intermediate should logically be placed in Group II and the pure grade in Group III. (See No. 23 below.) 11. Omit "naphthol" and add " alphanaphthol" and "betanaph- thol not suitable for medicinal use." The present law provides for "naphthol" with the qualification " all of the foregoing not * * * medicinals * * *." (Com- pare also with No. 23.) Naphthol is really a group name including two distinct but similar substances known as alphanaphthol and betanaphthol. Betanaphthol occurs in commerce in two grades differing in quality or purity. The pure grade is used for medicinal purposes and should be dutiable in Group III as a medicinal. The impure grade is used for the manufacture of dyes and medicinals and should be dutiable under Group II. Alphanaphthol is never used as a medicinal and therefore belongs in Group II. 12. Change the spelling of " binitrobenzol," " binitrochlorobenzol," " binitronaphthalene," " binitrotoluol," "diphenylaimin " and " anilin salts " to read " dinitrobenzol," " dinitrochlorbenzol." " dinitronaph- thalene." " dinitrotoluol," " diphenylaniin." " anilin salt." It is com- mercial practice to use the prefix " di " instead of " bi." The spelling " diphenylaimin " is wrong; it should be " diphenylaniin." The term " anilin salts " was probably inadvertently used instead of '• anilin salt." The latter term is commonly used in commerce in a definite sense meaning the hydrochloride of anilin which is much used by calico printers. The term "anilin salts" may be too broad and be held to include articles properly classified elsewhere. 13. xVdd the following substances to the list mentioned by name: Ainidobenznif arid, aniiilophonetnl. niniiioaiitliraquindno, arsanilic afid, bon- zalchlorido. benzanthrone. lienzidin sulphate, hi-nzoquinone, beiizoylchloride, hroinbenzoL chlorlienzo]. oiiiuaiiiio acid, dehydrotbiotnluidin. dianiinostilbeue, dic'lilorplitlialic acid, dimolbylaniidophenol, diiuelbylpben.vlenediamin, dinitro- lihouiil. t^tliyllii'ii/.ylaniliii. liydroxypheiiylarsinic acid, nitroaiithranuinoiie. nitfo- 48 benzaldehvde, nitrophenol, nitrosodimethylanilin, phenylhydraziue, phenylgly- cocoll, phenylglycocollorthocarboxylic acid, phthalimid, thiosalicylfc acid, tetra- chlorphtlialic acid, tetramethyldiaminobeuzoplieuone, tertrametliyldiaminodi- phenylmetliaue, toluol sulpliochioride, toluol sulphamid, tribromphenol. The addition of these substances to the list in the present law makes no change in the rates of duty, since they are presumably all covered in the basket clause of the present law which reads : all similar products obtained, derived, or manufactured in wbole or in part from tbe products provided for in Group I. The primary purpose of mentioning substances by name is to in- sure that detailed import statistics will be available. American manu- facturers agree that detailed knowledge of the activities of foreign competitors in the American market will be helpful to the American industry. The present law does not provide adequately for interme- diates used in making drugs and the most important of these have, therefore, been added. 14. Add '• thidcarbanilid." This article, which is presumably cov- ered by the present laAv. deserves special mention, because it may involve a new principle. Within the last few years it has been found that the addition of various coal-tar products to rubber will accelerate the process of vulcanization. Experimentation in this field is very active, and it would be premature to predict which substances will ultimately be found most useful. The four substances which have been most used are anilin. phenylenediamin. nitrosodimethvlanilin, and thiocarbanilid — the last menticned is the most used and is prob- ablv the best. The first three are important intennediatas for dyes. Thiocarbanilid appears not to have been used for this purpose, although it is possible that such a use will develop if it becomes com- mercially available as a result of a demand from the rubber industry. From the point of view of the manufacture of coal-tar products it miffht be regarded as a finished product and, therefore, logically classified in Group III as a member of a new class of finished prod- ucts^ — accelerators for the vulcanization of rubber. It is bought and consumed by the rubber industry just as dyes are bought and con- sumed by the textile industry. It is. however, no more difficult to make than many of the other articles in Group II, being made from anilin and carbon bisulphide. Since its chief rival commodities are in Group II and uses for the commodity as an intermediate are likely to develop, it is placed in Group 11. 15. After " sulphoacid salt of any of the foregoing" add "or of any of the products provided for in Group I.'' Sulphoacid deriva- tives of benzol, toluol, and naphthalene are important intermediates and should be provided for. 16. Change the clause " all similar products obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from the products provided for in Group I " to read : all other products by whatever name known which are employed in the manu- facture of any of the products provided for in Group II or III and which are obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from any of the fore- going or from any of the products provided for in Group I. The term " similar " is ambiguous, since the necessary degree of similarity is not made clear. The proposed new wording obviates this difficulty. Attention is called to the fact that this clause is fur- 49 ther qualified by the clause near the end of Group II. which in the proposed revision reads (see No. 19) : all of the foro.uoinc: not colors, dyes, or stains, color acids, color bases, color lakes, leuco-acids, leuco-bases, indoxyl, indoxyl compounds, ink powders, photographic chemicals, medicinals, synthetic resinlike products, synthetic tanning materials, or explosives, and otherwise speially provided for in this title. IT. Change the clause " all distillates which on being subjected to distillation yield in the portion distilling below two hundred degrees centigrade a quantity of tar acids equal to or more than five per centum of the original distillate" to read as follows: all distillates of coal-tar, blast-furnace tar, oil-gas tar, or water-gas tar, which on being subjected to distillation yield in the portion distilling below one hun- dred and ninety degrees centigrade a quantity of tar acids equal to or more than five per centum of the original distillate. The reason for this amendment is explained above under No. 5. 18. Add the clause — all mixtures, including solutions, consisting in whole or in part of any of the foregoing except sheep dip and medicinal soaps, not otherwise specially pro- vided for in this act. The object of this clause is to avoid the possibility that mixtures of these articles might be classified under paragraph 5 of the act of 1913 at 15 per cent instead of under Group II at 15 per cent plus 2^ cents per pound. Sheep dip and medicinal soaps are excluded, because they are commercially quite distinct articles, although they mav contain products covered by this law as essential ingredients. Sheep dip is on the free list of the act of 1913, and medicinal soaps are dutiable at 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 66_of the act of 1913. There is no indication that Congress intended to include these articles under the act of 1916. This question of mixtures is dis- cussed more fully under No. 35, below. 19. Insert the' words " color acids, color bases, color lakes, leuco- acids, leuco-bases, indoxyl. indoxyl compounds, ink powders, syn- thetic resinlike products', synthetic tanning materials," so that the revised law reads: all of the foregoing not colors, dyes, or stains, color acids, color bases, color lakes, leuco acids, ieuco bases, indoxyl, indoxyl compounds, ink powders, photo- graphic chemicals, medicinals, flavors, synthetic resinlike products, synthetic tanning materials, or explosives. This amendment is needed to conform to the changes in Group III, explained below (see Nos. 21, 22, 28, and 29). 20. Omit the phrase — and provided for in the paragraphs of the act of October third, nineteen hun- dred and thirteen, which are hereinafter specifically repealed by section five hundred and two. This clause seems to serve no useful purpose and may cause am- biguity in the repealing clause. Group III. — Dutiable at 30 per centvmh plus 5 cents per pound. 21. Add the words " Icuco-acids, and leuco-bases whether colorless or not. indoxyl and indoxyl compounds; " so that the clause reads: Group III. All colors, dyes, or stnins, whether soluble or not in water, color acids, color bases, color lakes, leuco-acids, and leuco-bases whether colorless or not, indoxyl and indoxyl compounds ; * * * 945S2— IS 4 50 This question is discussed by the commissioners on page 13. In the case of many dyes there is a closely related colorless compound from which the dye may be obtained easily and cheaply by a simple oxidation process. These compounds are known as leuco acids and leuco bases, and under the present law could not be classified in Group III, since they are not dyes. The derivation of the term " leuco " indicates that it is applied to colorless compounds, and this was the original use of the term. The use of the term has, however, been broadened, and it has acquired a technical chemical meaning to include compounds chemically analogous to the original " leuco compounds," even if not colorless. In this sense leuco compounds are substances formed from dyes by the chemical process known as reduction and readily converted back into dyes by the action of air or other oxidizing agent. They are usually colorless when pure, but not necessarily so. Moreover, althougli many of these compounds may be secured in a colorless con- dition in the laboratory by the rigid exclusion of air, in the factory it is not feasible or necessary to secure them sufficiently free from the dye to give a colorless product. It was therefore suggested that the phrase " whether colorless or not " should be added in order to make it plain to the court that the terms " leuco acids and leuco bases " are to be interpreted in a technical or chemical sense rather than by an exact translation of the original Greek meaning of the term " leuco." In some cases these leuco-acids and leuco-bases are obtained in the regular process of making the dye and require only one more easy chemical step to secure the dye itself. In other cases they can be easily made from the finished dye. In order to make it impossible for the German manufacturers to take advantage of this fact as a means of defeating the intent of Congress, it is suggested that leuco acids and leuco bases should be included in Group III. In the case of indigo there is a similar situation, which, however, can not be cared for with certainty by the same language. In one process for making indigo the substance incloxyl is obtained by a complex chemical process. The last chemical process in the indigo synthesis is to dissolve the indoxyl in water and blow air through the solution. Indoxyl is not a dye and could not be classified in Group III under the present law. Therefore the intent of Congress to protect the American indigo industry could be defeated by the importation of indoxyl at the lower rate of duty provided for articles in Group II. It is therefore recommended that the words " indoxyl and indoxyl compounds " be added to Group III. 22. Add " ink powders." There appears to be a similar possibility of evasion by taking advantage of paragraph 37 of the act of 1913, which reads, " ink and ink powders, fifteen per centum ad valorem." The difficulty arises in connection with writing inks, especially inks of other colors than black. Such writing inks often consist of a coal-tar dye with a little gum arabic or similar gum dissolved in water. In the case of inks intended for fountain pens this gum may be omitted entirely. The dye from which such an ink could be made by the simple addition of water might be called an ink powder. A dye which would be entirely suitable for such a purpose might be 51 invoiced as " ink powder" at 15 per cent, and after it had passed the jurisdiction of the customs authorities might be sold and used for the dying of textiles. The presence of gum arabic or similar gums would not prevent this use. In fact such gums are necessary for dyes to be used in printing on textiles. It does not seem probable that evasions would occur through the word " ink " in spite of the fact that nearly all inks, except black inks and some blue inks, depend on coal-tar dyes for their color. Printing inks (other than black and blue) usually consist of a color lake derived from a coal-tar dye ground in a vehicle consisting chiefly of linseed oil, to which other ingredients, such as resin oil, dryer, thinner, soap, etc., may be added. Such an ink could not be utilized for dyeing purposes. "^Black writing inks usually consist of a tannate of iron with gum and are not composed of coal-tar dyes. Writing inks of colors other than black consisting of a coal-tar dye with or without gum in a dilute water solution would be so heavy in proportion to their dye content that it seems improbable that the entent of Congress would be defeated by the importation of such inks. It therefore appears that the possibility of evasion will be avoided if the phrase " ink powders " is included in Group III, where it will be qualified by the phrase " when obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or iii part from any of the products provided for in Groups I or II." It is not intended to make any change in the classification of inks, which would still fall within paragraph 37 of the act of 1913. 23. In place of the word " medicinals " substitute the following : " acetnnilid suitable for medicinal use, acetphenetidin. acetylsalicylic acid, antipyrine, l:)enzaidehyde suitable for medicinal use, benzoic acid suitable for medicinal use, betanapbthol suitable for medicinal use, pbenolphthalein, re- sorcin suitable for medicinal use, salicylic . acid and its salts suitable for medicinal use. salol, and other medicinals. The general principle involved is discussed by the commissioners on page 12, the case of salol being taken as a typical example. The object of this amendment is to insure the legal effect bein^ given to the intent of Congi-ess in making synthetic medicinals derived from coal tar dutiable under this act. The present law has failed to ac- complish this because paragraph 18 of the act of 1913 has remained in force. To make the intent of Congress unmistakalile the coal-tar medicinals mentioned by name in paragraph 18 of the act of 1913 (nameh', salol. pbenolphthalein, acetanilid, acetphenetidin, antipy- rine, acetylsalicylic acid, aspirin) are repeated here, with the excep- tion of aspirin. Aspirin is omitted because it is the trade-mark name of the substance acetylsalicylic acid, and the article is included under this name. There are several instances of articles which appear in commerce in two grades, one of which is used as a medicinal and the other as an intermediate for dyes and other medicinals. Each of these substances is mentioned by name in Group III with the restrictive phrase " suitable for medicinal use " and in Group II with the restrictive phrase " not suitable for medicinal use." Phenol also is used both as a medicinal and as an intermediate especially for explosives and drugs. In the case of phenol, how- ever, the material which is used as an intermediate is usually of a quality or purity equal to that used as a medicinal and therefore to add the restrictive phrase " suitable for medicinal use " would in 52 effect raise the duty on the material consumed as an intermediate. This M'ould involve a departure from the intent of Congress in pass- ing the present act and therefore this qualifjdng phrase has not been added in the case of phenol. 24. Add " sodium benzoate." This question is discussed by the commissioners on pages 12 and 13. This substance is used chiefly as a preservative in food, although it is also used as a medicinal and is included in the United States Pharmacopoeia. The claim could, therefore, be made that it is cov- ered b}' the language of the present law, although in practice it is now being classified under paragraph 67 of the act of 1913 dutiable at 5 cents per pound. It is made from benzoic acid which is dutiable :at a much higher rate (15 per cent plus 2| cents), and there is, there- fore, an anomalous relationship between these two substances. It is suggested that sodium benzoate be taken out of paragraph 67 of the act of 1913 and be placed in Group III. 25. Add " saccharin." This proposed amendment is discussed by the commissioners on pages 12 and 13. The case of saccharin is analogous to that of the drugs now in- cluded in paragraph 18 of the act of 1913. Saccharin is a flavor derived from coal tar and is, therefore, described in general terms in the act of 1916. It is mentioned by name in paragraph 179 of the act of 1913, which imposes a duty of 65 cents per pound. Saccharin is several hundred times as sweet as sugar. It is included in the Pharmacopoeia because it is prescribed by physicians as a sweetening agent for patients suffering from diseases which make it inadvisable for them to consume sugar. It is, however, not regarded as a cura- tive agent itself. It was formerly used to a considerable extent as a sweetening agent in foods as a substitute for sugar. This use has. however, been greatly reduced by the enforcement of the pure food and drugs act. The Bureau of Chemistry contends that it is dele- terious to health and a fraudulent practice to substitute saccharin for sugar, since it is without nutritive value. Probably its chief use is as a sweetening agent for chewing tobacco, which does not come within the purview of the pure food and drugs act. Saccharin is made from toluol and as a consequence its manufacture in the United States was hampered by scarcity and high prices of toluol so long as the war continued, since the total available supplies of toluol were insufficient for our military needs. There seems to be no good reason to treat saccharin differently from other medicinals and flavors. At present (Nov. 15, 1918) prices of saccharin (about $9 per pound) 30 per cent plus 5 cents per pound would be an advance in the duty, but the present prices are very ab- normal on account of the fact that toluol, the basic raw material, has been abnormally high in price. At the prices likely to prevail after the war the rates of the proposed bill will probably be less than 65 cents per pound, which is the rate in the act of 1913. 26. Add " methyl salicylate," and " natural methyl salicylate, or oil of wintergreen or oil of sweet birch." Oil of wintergreen and ■oil of sweet birch are natural oils which contain over 99 per cent of methyl salicylate. The plants from which these oils are derived are native American plants. 53 The natural oils, which were formerly made in the United States, have been ahnost entirely driven out of the market by the synthetic methyl salicylate made" from coal tar. No true natural oils are therefore likely to be imported. Since it is extremely difficult if not impossible^ to distinguish between these natural and artificial products and quite impossible to detect large additions of syntlietic methyl salicylate to the natural oils, and since the natural oils would be dutiable at a lower rate under paragraph 46, it seems best to mention methyl salicylate specifically and to include both natural and synthetic methyl salicylate. Under the present law' the synthetic product could be fraudu- lently invoiced as oil of wintergreen or oil of sweet birch, and it would be practically impossible for the customs officers to secure proof of the fraud. The proposed wording \vould obviate this ad- ministrative difficulty. Methyl salicylate is used chiefly as a flavor (wintergreen) but also as a medicinal and to some extent as a perfume. 27. Add " coumarin, and other " and " natural coumarin.*' This case is very similar to the case of methyl salicylate discussed above. The substance coumarin is contained in several plants and was formerly obtained connnercially from natural sources (tonka beans and deer-tongue leaves), but the synthetic product made from coal tar has practically driven the natural coumarin out of the market. Its chief commercial use is as a flavor, but it is used to a slight extent as a perfume. By a decision of the Board of General Ap- praisers (Abstract No. 41691) rendered January 10, 1918, coumarin is held dutiable as a chemical compound at 15 per cent under paragraph 5 of the act of 1913. As the coumarin was imported prior to the passage of the act of September S. 191G, its classification imder that act was not in issue. It is proposed that natural coumarin be made dutiable at the same rate as synthetic coumarin in order to make it unnecessary for the customs officers to attempt to distinguish between the two products. This will defeat any attempt to import synthetic coumarin under paragraph 5 of the act of 1913, thus evading the evident intent of Congress to put flavors derived from coal tar under the act of September 8, 1916. 28. In place of " synthetic phenolic resin " substitute the follow- ing: " S3'nthetic phenolic resin and all resinlike products prepared! from phenol, cresol, phthalic anhydride, coumaron, indene or fromi any other article or material provided for in Group I or II, all of these products whether in a solid, semisolid, or liquid condition ; " This clause presents one of the most perplexing problems in the entire bill. The phrase " synthetic phenolic resins " is not accurately descriptive of "the articles intended to be covered by it. The articles intended to be covered by this phrase are artificial products resembling resins in many of their physical properties but differing in their chemical nature and chemical behavior from the true natural resins, such as rosin, kauri, and amber. They are sometimes referred to in technical literature or in patent desig- nations as " resins " or " resinous compositions," but there is no evi- dence that they are ever bought and sold as " synthetic phenolic resin " or as " resins." Each manufacturer has a trade-mark name r)4 for his own product, and these trade-mark names appear to be used in commercial transactions to the practical exclusion of all other names. Among such trade-mark names are the following: Bakelite, Condensite, and Redmanol. Some manufacturers sell the product only as a part of a finished article, such as electrical instruments or varnishes, without a separate designation for the resinous component. There are obvious objections to the use of trade names in the law. The general principle that articles should be designated in the tariff law by the names ordinarily used in their purchase and sale can not be followed in the present case. The first of these products to be developed commercially is made by the chemical combination of phenol and formaldehyde in the presence of a little alkali. "When these substances are heated to- gether under pressure the}^ undergo a chemical combination or " condensation," The change is a progressive one, which can be stopped at any desired stage b}' the control of the temperature and duration of the heating. The final product is a hard, transparent, tough, infusible, non- crystalline substance, which resembles amber in appearance and which is extraordinarily inert chemically. It is not affected by water, steam, oils, chlorine, alkalies, or dilute acids; is not soluble in any known solvent; and is noninflammable and infusible. It is destroyed by boiling concentrated mineral acids, but is not attacked by less drastic chemical treatment. It can be made transparent and colorless, and may be colored by adding suitable dyes. If desired, other materials, such as wood pulp, asbestos fibers, or pigments, may be incorporated with it. These additions make it opaque, less liable to fracture, and cheaper. In its final form it may be machined and polished. It is an excellent electric insulator. The usefulness of this material depends primarily, or at least very greatly, on the fact that the chemical process of making it is a pro- gressive one and can be stopped at intermediate stages. In the inter- mediate stage, the material is softened by heat and rendered plastic so that it can be molded into the shape of the finished article, such as buttons or pipe stems, and the final transformation into the finished state is completed in the mold. It can be molded around metal parts such as screws, electric binding posts, or electric switches, and thus serves for the manufacture of electrical measuring instruments and machinery. The material in the intermediate stage is made by a few firms operating under patents. These firms sell the intermediate stage, which is still plastic when heated, to a large number of other firms, who manufacture a great variety of finished articles by the process of molding, the transformation into the final stage being completed in the mold. The material is, however, also sold in the final chemical condition, in the form of blocks, slabs, rods, or tubes, for manufacture into finished articles by machining and polishing. If the chemical combination between phenol and formaldehyde is stopped at a still earlier stage, a product is obtained which is soluble in a number of volatile organic solvents, and which may be applied as a lacquer or varnish or used to impregnate porous mate- rials, such as soft wood. The transformation into the final stage may then be completed by heating. 55 Phenol has become expensive since the war began because of its importance in the manufacture of picric acid, and attention has thus been directed to the nse of substitutes. Cresol, which resembles phenol in many of its i)roperties, has been found to yield products similar to the resins made from pure phenol. Products of the same class may be made by the use of hexamethylenetetramine or para- form, instead of formaldehyde. Resinous products used chiefly in the manufacture of electrical instruments are also made by the chemical combination of phthalic anhydride, a coal-tar product, with glycerine. Coumaron and indene, which are found naturally in coal tar, are converted bv suitable chemical treatment into products wdiich resem- ble the natural resins in properties and use more closely than any of the products discussed above. They are soluble in organic solvents and, like the natural resins, are used chiefly in lacquers and varnishes. The phrase used in the act of 1916, ''synthetic phenolic resm * * * when obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from any of the products provided for in Groups I and II " is not satisfactory for the following reasons : (1) None of the products are identical with the natural resins And none are, therefore, '' synthetic resin.'' They resemble the resins ill some physical properties, but are different in chemical properties. (2) The 'term " phenolic " is unduly restrictive. The term " phe- nol " is used in chemical science in a double sense— («,) in a specific sense meaning a single substance CcH^OH or hydroxybenzenc ; (Z>) as a class or group name covering many other substances closely allied to phenol in chemical structure and properties. Cresol is a member of this class of " phenols," but the other materials used in the manu- facture of the resinous products discussed above are not " phenols." It is doubtful whether the courts will interpret this term " phe- nolic " in a collective sense, in view of the fact that elsewhere in this same law the term " phenol " is used in a specific sense as distinct from " cresol." Furthermore, even if the term " phenolic " is inter- preted in a broad sense, it could not include phthalic anhydride, coumaron, nor indene, which are not regarded by chemists as be- longing to the class of " phenols." (3) These articles are not bought and sold as " synthetic ]5henolic resin," but rather by brand names, such as were mentioned above. (4) The present 'law uses the word " resin " in the singular num- ber; whereas there the several different varieties. Xo entirely unobjectionable solution of the problem has been found, but the phraseology at the opening of this section appears to be the best of the many solutions which have been considered. The fundame'ntal difficulty is that these articles are new creations of chemical art for which there is no general name in use in com- merce or in the technical literature applicable to all. They are known bv trade names. It therefore appears to be necessary to describe them in terms of the materials from which they are made. The phrase now in the law is nevertheless retained, in order that it may be clear that there is no intention to place any articles now covered by the law outside of its scope. The unduly restrictive char- acter of the phrase is then remedied by the addition of clauses which broaden it. All of the varieties that have been developed on a com- 56 mercial scale are mentioned specifically. It is probable that other va- rieties "will be developed in the near future and these are provided for. The leadership in the invention and commercial development of these products has been taken by American chemists. 29. Add '■ synthetic tanning materials." This question is discussed by the commissioners on page 19. These synthetic tanning materials can be made not only from phenol itself, but also from other substances closely allied chemically to phenol, especially cresols, and from naphthalene. 30. In place of '* or explosives " substitute " Picric acid, trinitro- toluol and other explosives, except smokeless powders." Paragraph 501 of the free list of the act of 1913 reads as follows : Gunpowder and all explosives substances not specially provided for in this section used for mining, blasting, and artillery purposes. This paragraph was not specifically repealed by the act of 1916, which, however, places a duty of 30 per cent plus 5 cents per pound on ''explosives * * * when obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from any of the products provided for in Groups I and II." The most important bursting charges for shells are picric acid (and its ammonia salt) and trinitrotoluol (TNT), which are derived from coal tar products, and ammonium nitrate, which is not derived from coal tar. Others of minor importance are trinitroxylol trinitrometacresol, tetranitroanilin, tetranitromethylanilin, and dini- tronaphthalene. All of these except ammonium nitrate are clearly covered by the language of the act of 1916. The purpose of the pro- posed rewording is to make it clear that the present law controls, not section 501 of the act of 1913. Smokeless powder, which is used as a propellant for firing bullets and shells from guns, contains about three-fourths of 1 per cent of diphenylamin. which is a coal-tar product mentioned b}'^ name in Group II. Diphenylamin is not an explosive itself, but is added as a stabilizer, because it renders the powder less liable to deteriorate during storage and shipment. A strict interpretation of the lan- guage of the act of 1916 would include such smokeless powders, since they are made in part from coal-tar products. It seems doubtful if it was the intention of Congress to include smokeless powder on account of the incidental addition of coal-tar products. 31. Omit the clause " not otherwise specially provided for in this title." The effect of this omission is to strengthen Group III. 32. Add "all of the foregoing," so that the revised law reads: all of the foregoing when obtained, derived, or manufactured from any of the products provided for in Group I or II. The purpose of this change is to make sure that this restrictive clause applies to all of Group III. 33. Change " Groups I and II " to read " Group I or 11." The disjunctive "or" is evidently intended rather than the conjunctive "and." 34. Amend the clauses providing for natural alizarin and natural indigo so that they read: natural alizarin and natural ind'go and cobirs, dyes, stains, color acids, color I)ases, color lakes, leuco-acids, leuco-bases, indoxyl and indoxyl compounds obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from natural alizarin or natural indigo. 57 The words " stains, color acids, color bases * * * leuco-acids, leiico-bases, indoxyl and indoxyl compounds " are added here for the reasons explained under No. 21. 35. Add " and all mixtures, including solutions, consisting in whole or in part of any of the articles or materials provided for in this group." The purpose of this amendment is to make sure that mixtures of these articles with each other or with other materials shall not be held dutiable under paragraph 5 of the act of 1913 at 15 per cent. This clause is not intended to cover and would not cover distinct articles of manufacture containing some dye or other coal-tar prod- uct provided for in the act of 1913 in terms narrower or more specific than the clause in question. Numerous cases might be cited by way of illustration. Thus, a lithographic ink containing a color lake derived from a coal-tar dye would be more specifically provided for as " ink." Similarly, varnish, enumerated in paragraph 58, and paints and crayons, in paragraph G3, containing a coal-tar product which would still be dutiable under the more specific provisions of those paragraphs. On the other hand, in the case of many dyes the necessary intermediates are heated or melted with suitable inorganic reagents, such as sodium sulphide, caustic soda, or zinc chloride, thereby causing chemical combinations resulting in the dye or a substance so nearly approaching a dye that it can be converted into a dye by very simple or easy means. Such crude melts have not been articles' of commerce in the past, but it is probable that they could be imported under the present law for the purpose of evading the duty on dyes and the finishing processes carried out in the United States. Such " crude melts " would be dutiable under this clause piovided they contained the dye itself or a color acid or color base or leuco-acid, leuco-base, or indoxyl or indoxyl compound. The suggestion that all mixtures " consisting in ivhole or in part " of these articles or material follows the present tariff law and the interpretation placed upon it by the Board of General Appraisers. In the Fustin case (T. D., 37562^ see Appendix, p. 70) it was decided that a mixture of the fustic extract, a natural dye, with a coal-tar product is dutiable under the act of September 8, 1916, as it is " ob- tained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part " from coal tar. The courts will not interpret the phrase "m part'''' to include merely incidental or immaterial parts. The principle covering such cases is clearly and succinctly enunci- ated by the Supreme Court of the United States in Seeberger v. Schlesinger (152 U. S., 587), wherein, speaking of certain opera glasses in minor part of metal, the court says : And in view of the fact that, while the metal Is not the component of chief value, it is a substantial part of the finished glass, and the framework upon which the lenses and shell are mounted, we think these articles should be classed as manufactures of metal. We do not wish to be understood as hold- ins that, if the metal be a more incident or an innnaterial part of the com- pleted article, as, for instance, the screws or knobs upon an article of house- hold furniture, or the buttons upon an article of clothing, such articles should lie classified as manufactures in part of metal ; but where, as in this case, they form a necessary and substantial part of the article, we think this clause sliould determine their classification. An alternative clause would be " all mixtures containing as the component of chief value any of the articles or materials provided 58 for in this group." The administration of this clause would be ex- ceedingly difficult and lead to endless litigation. The " crude melts " referred to above are not articles of commerce abroad and would be imported solely for the purpose of evading the duty. Therefore, the provision of the act of 1913 which reads " and the value of each component material shall be determined by the ascertained value of such material in its condition as found in the article" can not be effectively applied. A clause " all mixtures containing as the principal ingredient by weight any of the articles or materials provided for in this section " wouJd be comparatively easy to administer, but the intent could be easily evaded by the addition of some cheap material which is either harmless or easily removed, such as water, salt, sand, or sawdust Section 501. 36. Omit the clause — (except natural and synthetic alizarin, and dyes obtained from alizarin, anthra- cene, and carbazol ; natural and synthetic indigo and all indigoids, whether or not obtained from indigo; and medicinals and flavors). The matters of policy involved in this suggested amendment are discussed by the commissioners on page 16. • Some additional details only are given here. The only dyes of these classes, Avhich were made in the United States during 1917, were indigo, dibromindigo, and alizarin. The production of indigo during 1917 was only 274,771 pounds — made entirely by one company. Two additional companies have begun the manufacture of indigo during 1918. By the end of 1918 it is probable that the production will be at a rate equal to the normal consumption of indigo in the United States unless the producers are hampered by the inability to secure acetic acid. Acetic acid, which is an essential raw material for making indigo, is in great demand for direct war uses, and has been commandeered by the War Department. In addition 14,100 pounds of dibromindigo were produced during 1917. But as only 6,850 pounds of this dye were imported during 1914 this dye is clearly of minor importance. It was also reported that 1,921,387 pounds of "indigo extract" were made in the United States, but this was made by treating imported indigo with sulphuric acid. Alizarin was made by a single producer but only on a small scale — hardly more than experimental. Some so-called '* alizarin " or "' anthracene " dyes were made, but they were not " obtained from alizarin or anthracene." For example, " alizarin yellow " is an azo dye derived from anilin. "Alizarin brown " or " anthracene brown " is, in a chemical sense, a derivative of alizarin but its method of manu- facture was such that it can not be said to have been " obtained from alizarin or anthracene." It was actually manufactured from phthalic anhydride and gallic acid. 37. Add the following to section 501: Provided, That the special duties herein provided for on colors, dyes, or stains, whether soluble or not in water, color acids, color bases, color lakes, leuco- acids, leuco-bases, indoxyl and iudoxyl compounds, shall be based on stand- ards of strength, which shall be established by the Secretary of the TreasuiT. and that upon all importations of such articles which exceed such standards r)9 of strength, the special duty of 5 cents per pounrl shall ho coinidited on the Avelgrht which the article would have if it were diluted to the standard str(?nsth, liul in no case shall any such articles of wliatever strenjith pay a special duty of Ii>ss tlian r> c(>nts per pound: J'rovidcd further, Tliat hesinninfi six months after the date of the passage of this act, no package containing any such color, dye, stain, color acid, color base, color lake, leuco-acid, leuco-base, indoxyl, or iudoxyl compound, shall he admitted to entry into the United States unless such package antl the invoice shall bear a plain, conspicuous, and truly descrip- ti\t' sialenienl cf the idciitity and percentage, exclusive of dilui'iits, of such color, dye, stain, color acid, color base, color lake, leuco-acid, leuco-base, in- doxyl or iudoxyl compound contained therein: And provided further, That be- ginning six months after the date of the passage of this act no package con- taining any such article shall be admitted to entry into the United States if it. or the invoice, bears any statement, design, or device regarding such article, or the ingredient or substances contained therein, which is false, fraudulent, or misleading' in any particular. In the enforcement of this section tlie Secre- tary of the Treasury shall adopt standards of strength which shall conform, as nearly as practicable, to the connnerciai strengths in u.se in the United States prior to .Iidy tirst, nineteen hundred and fourteen. This proposed amendment is discussed by the commissioners on page 14, It was presumably the intent of Congress that the 5 cents per pound specific duty on dyes should be assessed on the usual commer- cial strength, but there is no provision in the present law requiring that the duty shall be assessed in that way. Very few dyes are chemically pure, but they usually contain added diluents, such as salt, sodium sulnhate. sodium phosphate, dextrine, gums, or water. The practice of diluting the dyes had its origin in many cases in real technical difficulties involved in manufacturing them in pure form. For example, synthetic indigo is difficult to cUy, and when once dried is not as satisfactory to the dyer since it does not pass into solution readily. It has, therefore, become a trade custom to sell indigo in a paste containing '20 per cent of true indigo and 80 per cent of water. In other cases the process of manufacture yields a product containing an appreciable percentage of salt, which does no harm in the dyeing operations. The removal of this salt would unnecessarily increase the cost of the dye. This practice, which had its origin in real technical difficulties, has, however, been abused by the addition of large and unnecessary amounts of salt and other diluents. In some other cases, however, especially among the dyes of minor importance, there is no generally recognized standard of strength or purity which is used by all manufacturers and dealers. In some cases manufacturers will sell the same dye in different strengths under different names or designations. It is common practice for manufacttirers. and especially dealers and spectilators, to add extra salt to a dye to enable them to undersell their com- petitors. Under the present law dyes can be imported into the United States in a concentrated form and after passing through the customhouse can then be diluted to the usual commercial strength by the importer or dealer. This practice makes it much more difficult for the ap- praisers to detect undervaluation and also enables the importer to escape in part the specific duty. It is suggested that all imports of dyes shall be required to bear a plain, conspicuous, and truly descriptive statement of the identity and percentage of the dye contained therein, and that if false, fraud- 60 ulent, or misleading statements are contained on the package or the invoice therefor the goods shall not be permitted to enter. It is further suggested that the specific duty shall be levied on the basis of the usual commercial strength, and that if the dye is imported in a more concentrated form, the duty shall be computed on the weight which the dye would have if it were diluted to the usual commercial strength. The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to establish standards which shall conform as closely as practicable to the usual commercial strength in use in the United States prior to July 1, 1914. It is now and will continue to be necessary for the appraisers to compare the actual strength and purity of imported dyes with the usual commer- cial strength of that particular dye, for the purpose of checking the valuation. Therefore, the requirement that the identity and per- centage shall be disclosed will greatly facilitate the assessment of both the ad valorem and specific duties. This requirement will make it unnecessary for the appraisers' laboratory to test every shipment since they will soon learn to distinguish between firms fully and habitually complying with the laws and firms attempting to defraud the Government by false declarations. The primary purpose of this proposed amendment is to assist the appraisers in preventing undervaluation and to make the specific duty applicable to the usual commercial strength, which apparently was the original intent of Congress. Incidentally, this provision for the truthful labeling of dyes will protect the consumers of dyes against fraud and the American manufacturers of dyes against un- fair competition from foreign manufacturers. It is a notorious fact that unfair methods of competition such as bribery of purchas- ing agents, adulteration, and misbranding have been especially preva- lent in the dye industry. This provision will make it illegal for German dyes to be imported branded as Swiss goods. Some diffi- culty will be experienced in establishing the standards of strength, especially in the case of the less important dyes. The improvement in the administration of the act, however, and incidentally the re- straint on unfair competition in the dye trade will more than over- balance these initial difficulties. 38. Omit " during the period of five years beginning five years after the passage of this act " and add " beginning September ninth, nineteen hundred and twenty-one." Omit " so that at the end of such period " and add " until September eighth, nineteen hundred and twenty-five, after which date " so that the revised law reads : Beginning September ninth, nineteen liuuclrecl and twenty-one, sucli special duties shall be annually reduced by twenty per centum of the rate imposed by this section until September eighth, nineteen hundred and twenty-fiTe, after which 'date such special duties shall no longer be assessed, levied, or collected. The present law reads: During the period of five years beginning five years after the passage of this act such special duties shall be annually reduced by twenty per centum of the rate imposed by this section, so that at the end of such period such special duties shall no longer be assessed, levied, or collected. This clause is ambiguous for the reason that if the duties were re- duced in the manner specified, the special duties would cease to be 61 assessed at the beginning of the fifth year instead of at the end of the fifth year. This is shown in the table below : Special duty per pound on— Period of gradual reduction. Group Group u. ni. Sept. 9, 1921, to Sept. S, 1922 Cents. Cents. 2 4 Sept. 9, 1922, to Sept. 8, 192.3 li 3 Sept. 9, 1923, to Sept. S, 1924 1 2 Sept. 9, 1924, to Sept. S, 1925 i 1 Sept. 9, 1925 < The proposed new wording preserves unchanged the original intent of Congress and avoids any ambiguity in regard to the dates which might result from the repeal of the original act. 39. Omit the words — but if, at the expiration of five years from the date of the passage of this act. the President tiiids that tliere is not beiny manufactured or prqduced within the United States as much as sixt.v per centum in value of the domestic consump- tion of the articles mentioned in Groups II and III of section 500, he shall by proclamation so declare, whereupon the special duties imposed by this sec- tion on such articles shall no longer be assessed, levied, or collected. This suggested amendment is discussed by the commissioners on page 15. 10. Add the clause " The Secretary of the Treasury is hereby au- thorized to make regulations for the enforcement of the provisions of this title." Several of the provision^i of the law will require analyses or testing of the imported materials. The details of laboratory technique for the tests should be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. Section 502. 11. In addition to the paragraphs of the act of 1913 which are specifically repealed in the act of 1916, repeal the following para- graphs or" parts of paragraphs of the act of 1913: 18 (the provisions for salol, phenolphthalein, acetanilid, acetphenetidin, antipyrine, acetylsalicylic acid, and aspirin), 67 (the provisions for benzoate of soda), and 179 (saccharin), so that the proposed bill reads: That paragraphs twenty, twenty-one, twent>'-two, twenty-three, one luuidrod and s.vn.t.-.-ninc. rliree liunihxMl and niiiet.v-lour. four hundred and (ifty-two, and five hundred and fourteen, and the provision for salicylic acid in paragraph one. and provisions for salol, phenolphthalein, acetanilid, acetphenetidin, anti- pyrine, acetylsalicylic acid, and aspirin in paragraph eighteen, and the provision for benzoate of soda in paragraph sixty-seven, and the provisions for carbolic and phthalic acids in paragraph three hundred and eighty-seven of an act entitled "An act to reduce tariff duties and to provide revenue for the Govern- ment, and for other purposes," approved October third, nineteen hundred and thirteen, are hereby repealed. The effect of this is to make the repealing claii.-^es consistent with the revisions already discu.ssed. 42. Add the following : Provided. That all articles which may come within the terms of paragraphs one. five, thirty-seven, forty-six, sixty-three, five hundred and one, and five hundred and thirty-eight of .said act of October three, nineteen hundred and 62 thirteen, as well as within the terms of Group I, II, or III of section 500 of this act, shall be assessed for duty or exempted from dutv, as the case may be under this act. " ' The paragraphs of the act of 1913 referred to read as follows: 1. Acids: Boracic acid, | cent per pound; citric acid, 5 cents per pound- formic acid, 1^ cents per pound ; gallic acid, 6 cents per pound : lactic acid' li cents per pound ; oxalic acid, 1* cents per pound ; pyrogallic acid, 12 cents per pound; salicylic acid, 2* cents per pound; tannic acid and tannin, 5 cents per pound; tartaric acid, 3^ cents per pound; all other acids and acid an- hydrides not specially provided for in this section, 15 per centum ad valorem. 5. Alkalies, alkaloids, and all chemical and medicinal- compounds, prepara- tions, mixtures, and salts, and combinations thereof not specially provided for in this section. 15 per centum ad valorem. 37. Ink and ink powders. 15 per centum ad valorem. 46. Oils, distilled and essential : Orange and lemon. 10 per centum ad va- lorem ; peppermint. 25 cents per pound ; mace oil, 6 cents per pound ; almond, bitter; amber; ambergi'is; anise or anise seed: bergamot ; camomile; caraway; cassia; cinnamon; cedrat: citronella and lemon-grass; civet; fennel; jasmine- or jasimine; .iuniper : lavender, and aspic of spike lavender; limes; neroli or orange flower ; origanum, red or white ; rosemary or anthoss ; attar of roses ; thyme ; and valerian ; all the foregoing oils, and all fruit ethers, oils, and essences, and essential and distilled oils and all combinations of the same, not specially provided for in this section, twenty per centum ad valorem : Provided, That no article containing alcohol shall be classified for duty under this para- graph. 63. Enamel paints, and all paints, colors, pigments, stains, crayons, including^ charcoal crayons or fusains, smalts, and frostings, and all ceramic and glass fluxes, glazes, enamels, and colors, whether crude, dry, mixed, or ground with water or oil or with solutions, other than oil, not specially provided for in this section, fifteen per centum ad valorem: all 'paints, colors, and pigments com- monly known as artists' paints or colors, whether in tubes, pans, cakes, or other forms, twenty per centum ad valorem; all color lakes, whether dry or in pulp, not specially provided for in this section, twenty per centum ad valorem. 501. Gunpowder, and all explosive substances, not specially provided for in this section, used for mining, blasting, and artillery purposes. 53S. Madder and miin.ieet, or Indian madder, ground or prepared, and all extracts of. The?^e paragraphs can not be repealed without qualifications, be- cause they also cover articles not derived from coal tar as well as coal-tar products. 43. Omit the phrase " and so much of said act or of any existing law or parts of laws as may be inconsistent with this title." The inconsistent portions are specifically repealed in the proposed bill. , , . , , Sectiox 503. 44. Add: That on and after the day when this act shall go into effect all of the fore- going goods, wares, and merchandise previously imported, for which no entry has been made, and all of the foregoing goods, wares, and merchandise previ- ously entered without payment of duty and under bond for warehousing, trans- portation, or any other purpose, for which no permit of delivery to the importer or bis agent has been issued, shall be subject to the duties imposed by this act and to no other duty, upon the entry or the withdrawal thereof: Provided. That when duties are based upon the weiebt of merchandise deposited in any pub- lic or private bonded warehouse, said duties shall be levied and collected upon the weight of such merchandise at the time of its entry. This clause will facilitate the administration of the act. , ^ , , , Sectiox 504. 45. Add: Except as otherwise specially provided, this act shall take effect on the day following its passage. DECISIONS OF THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT UNITED STATES BOARD OF GENERAL APPRAISERS AND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS UPON CLASSIFICATION UNDER TITLE V OF THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1916 Chapter 463 (39 Stat., 756. 793, 794) 63 DECISIONS OF THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES BOARD OF GENERAL APPRAISERS AND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS UPON CLASSIFICATION UNDER TITLE V OF THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1916. Treasury Department, Division of Customs^ October J, 1916. The Collector of Customs, Ogdenshurg^ N. Y. Sir: The department is advised that certain trinitrotoluol imported at the ports of Malone and Rouses Point in your district is being re- turned as dutiable at 30 per cent ad' valorem and 5 cents per pound, under section 500 (Group 3) and section 501 of Title V of the act of September 8, 1916. The said rates are provided for as applicable to, among other things, " explosives, not otherwise specially provided for in this title, when obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from any of the proclucts provided for in Groups 1 and 2." Paragraph 501 of the tariff act of October 3, 1913, provides for the free entry of " all explosive substances, not specially provided for in this section, used for * * * artillery purposes." Section 502 of Title V of the act of September 8, 1916, specifically repealed certain enumerated paragraphs in both the dutiable arid free lists of the act of October 3, 1913, and so much of said act or any ex- isting law or parts of law as may be inconsistent with the said title, but paragraph 501 of the act of 1913 is not among those specifically enumerated. The paragraphs repealed relate largely to coal-tar dyes, products specifically enumerated, and coal-tar products not specially provided for. and the department is of the opinion that paragraph 501 of the tariff act of 1913, relative to explosives for specific uses which was not specifically repealed, was not repealed by the general repealing clause, and is still in force. Of the two provisions in ques- tion for explosives in the two acts, it appears that that governed by use is the more specific (Magone v. Heller, 150 U. S., 70). The department is of the opinion, therefore, that trinitrotoluol, the chief use of which, it appears, is as an explosive for artillery purposes (T. D. 36526). is free of duty under paragraph 501 of the tariff act of 1913. You will be governed accordingly. Respectfully, Andrew" J. Peters, Assistant Secretary. Treasury Department, Division of Customs^ Novemher 7, 1916. The Appraiser or Merchandise, 6Jfl Washington Street^ New York, N. Y. Sir: I have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 9th ultimo, relative to the department's letter of the 5th ultimo addressed to the collector of customs at Ogdensburg in regard to the classifica- 945S2— 18 P 65 66 tion of certain explosives for specific uses, which were held to be free of duty under paragraph 501 of the tariff act of 1913. The department is of the opinion that the general repealing clause of section 502, Title V of the act of September 8, 1916, repealed only so much of the act of October 3, 1913, as relates to merchandise similar in character to that embraced in the paragraphs specifically repealed. The department is also of the opinion that where the act of September 8, 1916, does not in terms repeal the act of October 3, 1913, the two will stand so far as effect can be given to both, and that of two competing provisions in the respective acts, the one which is more specific takes precedence. This ruling would apply to other articles that may be provided for in general terms in the new act, but which are specifically pro- vided for in the act of 1913 in a provision therein not specifically repealed. Medicinals provided for eo nomine, such as salol, phenol- phthalein, acetanilid, acetphenetidin, antipyrine, acetylsalicylic acid, and aspirin, in paragraph 18 of the tariff act of 1913, are more specifically provided for under the said paragraph 18 than under the general provisions for medicinals of group 3 of title 5 of the new act, and the department is of the opinion that they are properly dutiable at 25 per cent ad valorem under the said paragraph 18 of the act of 1913. In this connection it may be noted that the word " carbolic " in the acid paragraph 378 of the act of 1913, was specifically repealed by section 502 of the new act, although carbolic acid, it appears, is pro- vided for only in general terms in the new act, while the provisions for salol, phenolphthalein, etc., were not enumerated in the repealing clause. Kespectfully, Wm. p. Malbtjrn, Assistant Secretary. (T. D. 37417.) Creosote oil. Certain oil commercially known as creosote oil at the time of the passage of the revenue act of September 8, 1916, free of duty under Group I, section 500, Title V, of that act, even though on being ^ilubjected to distillation it yields in the portion distilling below 200° centigrade a quantity of tar "acids equal to or more than 5 per cent of the original distillate. Treasury Department, November 23., 1917. Sir : The department refers to your letter of September 29, 1917 (T. D. 36667), relative to the classification of certain creosote oil under the act of September 8, 1916. One of the shipments, it appears, on being subjected to distillation yields in the portion distilling below 200° centigracle a quantity of tar acids equal to or more than 5 per cent of the original distillate. You express the opinion that the merchandise is nevertheless free of duty under the provision for creosote oil in Group I, section 500, Title V, of said act. At other ports it appears similar merchandise is assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem and 2| cents per pound under Group II of the said section and section 501 on the ground that it is not creosote oil. (57 It appears, however, that the article was commercially bought and sold as creosote oil at the time of the passage of the revenue act of September 8, 1916, and that a delivery of such merchandise would have been a good delivery for creosote oil without specifications. The department therefore concurs in the view that oil of the char- acter in question is free of dutv as creosote oil under Group I. sec- tion 500, Title V, of the act of September 8, 191G, even though on being subjected to distillation it yields in the portion distilling below 200° centigrade a quantity of tar acids equal to or more than 5 per cent of the original distillate. You will be governed accordingly. Respectfully, L. S. Rowe, (GTG73.) Assistant Secretary. Collector or Customs, St. Paul, Minn. (T. D. 37429— G. A. 8110.) Artists^ colors — Coal-tar colors. Artists' colors or paints, derived from indigo and alizarin, are properly classi- fied under Group III of the act of September 8, 1916, rather than under the provision for " artists' paints or colors, or color lakes " in paragraph 63 of the act of October 3, 1913. United States General Appraisers, New York, November 23, 1917. In the matter of protest 81529.3 of Favor, Ruhl & Co. against the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York. [Affirmed.] Comstock cG Washburn {Henry J. Rode of counsel) for the importers. Bert Hanson, Assistant Attorney General (Charles D. Laicrence, special at- torney), for the United States. Before Board 1 (McClelland, Sulli^'an, and Brown, General Appraisers; Mc- Clelland, G. A., not participating), Brow^n, General Appraiser: This suit was brought under the cus- toms practice act, known as the customs administrative act, to pro- cure a refund of customs duties claimed to have been illegally exacted because certain artists' colors or paints were classified by the col- lector at the port of New York under Group III of section 500, Title V, of the revenue act of September 8, 1916, instead of under para- graph C3 of the act of October 3, 1913, as the importers claim. The record shows that the first lot consists of indigo colors, which was classified at 30 per cent under said section HOO, and the second lot, alizarin lakes, which was classified at 30 per cent under said sec- tion 500, plus 5 cents per pound, under section 501 of said act of 1916. Group III of section 500 reads as f ollow^s : Group III. All colors, dyes, or stains, whether soluble or not in water, color acids, color bases, color -lakes, photographic chemicals, medicinals, flavors, syn- water or oil or with solutions other than oil, not specially i)rovided for in this title, when obtained, derived, or manufactured in whole or in part from any of the products provided for in Groups I and II, natural alizarin and indigo, and colors, dyes, or color lakes obtained, deyived, or manufactured therefrom, thirty per centum ad valorem. The first clause of section 501 reads as follows : Sec. 501. That on and after the day following the passage of this act, in ad- dition to the duties provided in section five hundred, there shall be levied, col- 68 lected. and paid upon all articles contained in Group II a special duty of 2i cents per pound, and upon all articles contained in Group III (except natural and synthetic alizarin, and dyes obtained from alizarin, antliracene, and car- bazol; natural and synthetic indigo and all idigoids, whether or not obtained from indigo ; and medicinals and flavors) a special duty of 5 cents per pound. Paragraph 63 of the act of 1913, under which the importers claim, reads as follows : 63. Enamel paints, and all paints, colors, pignients, stains, crayons, including charcoal crayons or fusains, smalts, and frostings, and all ceramic and glss fluxes, glazes, enamels, and colors, whether crude, dry, mixed, or ground with water or oil or with solutions other than oil, not specially provided for in this section, 15 per centum ad valorem, all paints, colors, and pigments commonly known as artists' paints or colors, whether in tubes, pans, cakes, or other forms, 20 per centum ad valorem ; all color lakes, whether dry or in pulp, not specially provided for in this section, 20 per centum ad valorem. It was in evidence that, prior to the passage of the act of September 8. 1916, the merchandise in question was classified under paragraph 63 of the act of 1913, under which the importers now claim. The portion of the act of 1916 dealing with the tariff bears the heading " Title V. — Dyestuffs," and the repealing clause is contained in section 502, and reads as follows: 502. That paragraphs twenty, twenty-one, twenty-two, and twenty-three and the words " salicvlic acid " in paragraph one of Schedule A of section one of an act entitled "An act to reduce tariff duties and to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes," approved October third, nineteen hundred and thirteen, and paragraphs three hundred and ninety-four, four hundred and fifty-two, and five luindred and fourteen, and the words "carbolic" and " phthalic," in paragraph three hundred and eighty-seven of the " free list " of section one of said act, and so much of said act or any existing law or parts of law as may be inconsistent with this title are hereby repealed. The importers claim that, there being nothing express in the act about paints, colors, or pigments, nor any reference to any of the other articles named in paragraph 63 of the act of 1913, nor to the paragraph itself, it is plain Congress intended to repeal the coal-tar paragraphs of the tariff act of 1913, and to admit free of duty coal- tar crudes and to levy duty upon coal-tar intermediates and coal-tar colors and certain acids oiily. Further, that it would be a repeal by implication to construe the language found at the end of section 502 of the act of 1916 as intended to repeal the provisions of paragraph 63. The importers further contend that there is nothing mconsistent or repugnant between the new act and paragraph 63, the new act dealing with the coal-tar colors and dyes, whereas paragraph 63 ot the tariff act embraces paints, colors, and pigments, which, they clami, are an entirely different class. n ^i . xi The GoA-ernment's counsel, on the other hand, contends that the act of 1016 does refer to " colors," which are likewise mentioned in paragraph 63. and enumerates " other articles named in paragraph 63," notably "stains" and "color lakes," and that these latter arti- cle's are mentioned in both Group II and Group III of section 500 of the act of 1916, and that Groups II and III enumerate "photo- graphic chemicals," " medicinals," and " flavors." This, he claims, shows an intention on the part of the Congress by the lan. 2S'')41 — and has been generally construed as indicpting an intent to In-ing within its scope articles containing a component mak- ing up only a part of the article, even if snch part is not its chief component of A-aliie. The department is therefore of the opinion that the provision in question of the act of September 8, 1916, includes the articles in question as well as do the provisions mentioned for medicinal preparations of the tariff act of 1913. It is ah;o of the opinion that the said provision of the act of September 8, 1916, is more specific than the provisions in question covering medicinal preparations of the tariff act of 1913. (Xote T. D. 37429 of Nov. 23, 1917, relative to certain artists' colors.) The department therefore concurs in the proposed change in the classification, and you will be governed accordingly on merchandise of the character in question imported or withdrawn from warehouse 30 days after the date hereof. The following are some of the medicinals to which this ruling will apply in addition to homotropine hydrobromide : Eserine salicylate, theobromine salicylate, caffeine sodium benzoate, atropine salicylate, bismuth subsalicylate, bismuth benzoate, bismuth borophenate, guaia- col benzoate, and guaiacol salicylate. Eespectfully, L. S. Rowe, (104297.) Assistant Secretary. Collector of Customs, New York. (T. D. 37679— G. A. 8176.) Creosote oil. In the absence of evidence dealing witli the general characteristics of the sub- stances mentioned in Group I of section .500 of the tariff portion of the rev- enue act of 1916 to indicate a contrary intent, held, on the evidence in this record, that certain creosote oil here under consideration is free of duty under the eo nomine provision therefor. The provision covering " all other distillates which on being subjected to distillation yield in the portion dis- tilling below two hundred degrees centigrade a quantity of tar acids less than five per centum of the original distillate," is not applicable to creosote oil. United States General Appraisers, New York, June 14, 1918. In the matter of protest 826511 of A. W. Fentou, jr., against the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of Cleveland. [Reversed.] Curie, Smith & MaxxoeU {Albert MeCIelland Barnes of counsel) for the im- porter. Bert Hanson, Assistant Attorney General (CJias. D. Lawrence and Samuel Isenschmid, special attorneys), for the United States. Before Board 1 (McClelland, Sullivan, and Bkown, General Appraisers). Broavn, General Appraiser: This case was brought under the legal procedure provided by the customs administrative act to procure the refund of duty claimed to have been illegally exacted by the collector of customs at the port of Cleveland. The trial was had in part at Cleveland and in part by continuance at New York. 74 The merchandise was classified for duty as a coal-tar distillate^ which on being subjected to distillation yields in the portion distilling below 200° C. a quantity of tar acids equal to or more than 5 per cent of the original distillate, at 15 per cent ad valorem and 2| cents per pound under Group II, section 500 and section 501, of the tariff por- tion of the revenue act of 1916. The importer claims that the merchandise is creosote or dead oil, and as such is specifically enumerated and provided for in Group I of section 500 of said act, and is therefore free of duty. Group I of said act, title " Free list." after enumerating a number of substances of certain purity, concludes with the following : * * * Pyridin. quinolin, toluol, xj^ol, crude coal tai', pitch of coal tar, dead or creosote oil, anthracene oil, all other distillates which on being subjected to distillation yield in the portion distilling below two hundred degrees centigi'ade a quantity of tar acids less than five per centum of the original distillate, and all other products that are found naturally in coal tar, whether produced or obtained from coal tar or other source, and not otherwise specially provided for in this title, shall be exempt from duty. The local appraiser, in claiming that the merchandise is not free of duty, asserts that the clause appearing in Group I of section 500, reading " all other distillates which on being subjected to distillation yield in the portion distilling below two hundred degrees centigrade a quantity of tar acids less than five per centum of the original dis- tillate," applies to creosote oil and all the other articles specifically mentioned in Group I, and as the record shows that the tar acids here distilling under 200° C. amounted to more than 5 per cent, claims that the Congress intended to place duty on this form of creosote oil. But it seems to us that the " all other distillates " referred to mean distillates not specially mentioned by name, and that creosote oil was intended to be made free, irrespective of the limitation referred to. This seems to be the natural meaning of the words as used by the Congress, and there is nothing in the evidence in this record which would indicate a contrary intention. Therefore, on the record now before us, we hold the merchandise in question free of duty under the free-list provision, Group I of section 500 of the act of 1916. Before Board 1, July 29, 1918. No. 42413.— Protest 817341 of G. A. & E. Meyer (New York). • Coal-Tar Colors — Tuscan Eed. — Merchandise invoiced as " Tus- can red," returned as a coal-tar color lake, and classified at 30 per cent ad valorem plus 5 cents per pound under the act of September 8, 1916, is claimed dutiable at 20 per cent under paragraph 63, tariff act of 1913, as color lakes. Opinion by Brown, G. A. The merchandise was found to be the same as that the subject of decision in Abstract 40363, and following that decision it was held properly classified at 30 per cent ad valorem plus 5 cents per pound under section 500 (Group III) and section 501 of Title V of the act of September 8, 1916. 10 (T. D. 37740— G. A. 8192.) Oresol. Considoriiis only the comnion Tiicanins of (he words of (he statute, certain mer- chandise consisting of more than 5 per cent of phenol, more than 50 per cent of cresols, and more than 5 per cent of tar acids distilling below 200° C. is free of duty under Group I. act of 1916, as cresol, and not dutiable under Group II of said act— Case of Fenton, jr., G. A. 8176 (T. D. 37679), followed. United States General Appraisers, New York, August 9, 1918. In the matter of protests 810471, etc., of Wm. A. Foster & Co., et al. ajrainst the assess- ment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York. Reversed. Brooks c(- Brooks (Frederick 11'. Brooks, /r., of counsel) for the importers. Bert Hanson, Assistant Attorney General {Harry M. Farrell, special attor- ney), for the United States. Before Board 1 (McClelland, Sullivan, and Bkown, General Appraisers), Brown, General Appraiser : This case was brought under the legal procedure provided by the customs. administrative act to procure the refund of dut}^ claimed to have been illegally exacted by the col- lector of customs at the port of Xew York. The merchandise was classified for dutj- as a coal-tar distillate, \yhi(h, on being subjected to distillation, yields in the portion dis- tilling below 200° C. a quantity of tar acids equal to or more thun 5 per cent of the original distillate, at 15 per cent ad valorem and 2| cents per pound under Group II, section 500 and section 501, of the tariff portion of the revenue act of 1916, The importers claim the merchandise is free of duty as cresol, which is specifically named in Group I, section 500, of the act of 1916, the free-list portion. Group I also admits free of duty meta- cresol having a purity of less than 90 per cent, orthocresol having a purity of less than 90 per cent, and paracresol having a purity of less than 90 per cent. The dutiable portion of the same act taxes phenol, metacresol having a purity of 90 per cent or more, orthocresol having a purity of 90 per cent or more, and paracresol having a purity of 90 per cent or more. The report of the Government chemist shows the composition of the article in dispute to be about as follows : Tar acids containino: more than 5 per cent of phenol, more than 50 per cent of cresols, and more than 5 per cent of tar acids distilling below 200° C. One of the samples runs as high as 12.6 per cent " phenol " and two under 5 per cent. The intermediate dutiable list. Group II, also contains a provision taxing coal-tar distillates not otherwise provided for which below 200" C. distill a quantity of tar acids equal to or more than 5 per cent of the original distillate. If the sub.stance here involved was not specifically named it would come under the latter provision and would be dutiable as classified. The importers claim, however, that 76 it is specifically enumerated as cresol, and that the board having decided in the case of A. W. Fenton, jr., G. A. 8176 (T. D. 37679), that the clause relating to 5 per cent of tar acids does not apply to anything specially enumerated, therefore this merchandise is free of duty under Group I as cresol. The record is voluminous. The importers put on the stand a number of commercial witness dealing in the product who testified that the substance here involved is known in the trade as cresol, crysilic acid, or liquid crude carbolic acid, said terms being inter- changeable, and that this substance is so bought and sold all over the United States. The Government in rebuttal introduced several witnesses, one of whom stated that he only dealt with cresol U. S. P. (that is, of the standard of purity mentioned in the United States Pharmacopoeia) and testified that the term " cresol " was limited to cresol U. S. P. ; and a second witness who testified that when the trade used the term " cresol " it meant cresol U. S. P., and that crude impure cresols were sold by his firm only under designated numbers as, for instance, cresol No. 5. The Government also introduced two letters tending to show that one witness for the importers, who was a chemist, had made declarations to the effect that cresol alwa^'s meant cresol U. S. P., and that another witness, one of the importers, the taxation of whose goods is in issue, made a similar declaration. Assuming, without deciding, that this produces a sufficient conflict in the trade testimony to prevent the establishment of a custom by way of trade designation which would be definite, uniform, and gen- eral throughout the United States, we think that the common mean- ing of the terms used as shown by the dictionary definitions and other literature on the subject establishes that the three terms, cresol, cres^dic acid, and liquid carbolic acid, are sjmonymous. Thorpe's Dictionarj^ of Applied Chemistry (vol. 2, p. 165) reads: CresyUc acid. — The noncrystallizable, higher boiling portion of the phenols obtained in the purificatiou of phenol (q. v.) is, after redistillation, known commercially ns cresylic acid or liquid carholic acid. It is a colorless, oily, refractive liquid, does not solidify at 80°, has a specfic gravity of 1.044, and consists of 40 per cent metacresol, 35 per cent orthoc-resol, and 25 per cent para- cresol. (Schulze, Ber., 1887, 410.) (Italics ours.) The same author, in volume 1 of the same work, under the head of "Carbolic acid. phe7'iol" in describing some of the methods of obtain- ing crude carbolic acid (from which the pure carbolic acid is after- wards obtained) says near the bottom of the first column on page 657: The crude carbolic thus obtained contains, besides phenol (carbolic acid), about 14 to 15 per cent of water and variable quantities of cresylic acid. It occurs in commerce in three qualities, known as 75's. 60's, and 50"s crude car- bolic acid, and its value is determined by " Lowe's " test. (This test being the measure of the quality of the carbolic acid.) And later, in describing the process of obtaining the pure carbolic acid from the crude carbolic acid, concludes with this statement: The liquid portion is either sold as liquid carbolic acid or is worked up again with the next batch. The drained crystals are treated with a small quantity of concentrated sulphuric acid and potassium dichromate and redistilled, when " pure " crystallized carbolic acid of commerce is obtained. In some cases the separation of the last ti-aces'of cresylic acid is effected by adding a small quantity of water, and the mixture is cooled, when a hydrate of carbolic acid i i crj'i^tallizes out: this is separated from tlie liquid portion, whicli contains tlie cresjiie acid, and tlie crystals are redistilled. The Century Dictionary, 1913 (Vol. II, p. 1346), reads: Crcsol.—'nxQ scleral iiauio of the three isomeric phenols of the composition CtHsO, occurring in coal- and wood- tar. Two are crystilliue solids and one a liquid. Also crcsijlic acid and cressol. Crcsijlic—Ot or pertaining to cresyl— Cresylic acid, cresylic alcohol, hydrate of cresyl, various names lor cresol, C-HsO, a colorless liquid found in coal-tar creosote and in the tar from beech-wood and fir-wood. Homologous with phenol or carbolic acid. The Standard Dictionary, 1910 (Vol. I, p. 439), reads: CresoL—Js.ny one of three isomeric crystalline (CiHsO) obtained by the de- structive distiUntion of coal, beech-wood, and pine-wood. Called also cresylic acid, methyl phenol, oxy toluene. Cresylic. — Of or derived from cresyl— Cresylic acid, same as cresol. Moreover, in the appeal of Schultz (94 Fed., 820), where an article which, as appears from the findings of facts in the opinion of General Appraiser Tichenor below, was of similar character, although the issue of law was entirely different, the terms "crude carbolic acid" and " cresylic acid " seemed to be used interchangeably. And in Schoellkopf, Hartford & Maclagan v. United States (94 Fed., 640) an article somewhat similar in composition was conceded to be com- mercially knoAvn as crude carbolic acid. While the eighth edition of the United States Pharmacopoeia and tlie 1907 edition of the United States Dispensatory described cresol as free from phenol, we take such definition as referring to the pure hieli-grade medicinal form. ]Moreover, in the ninth edition of the Pharmacopoeia of September 1, 1916. the statement "free from plienol " is omitted. We therefore hold that Congress in using the term " cresol " gen- erally without limitation as to purity, coupled with the three other terms, ortho, meta, and para cresol when not more than 90 per cent pure, intended to admit this article free of duty and did not intend to change the law and tax these impure cresols, all of which, to- gether witli the U. S. P. variety, under the previous departmental practice under the act of 1913. had been admitted free. See T. D. 35667. And there is nothing in the language of the act which would indi- cate that the presence of more than 5 per cent (running in some of the analyses to about 12.6) of phenol would produce a different result. Although it is clear that phenol itself is to be taxed under the new act the presence of this small percentage of phenol would not, in our opinion, make the substance here involved taxable as " phenol." The protests claiming free entry are therefore sustained. Befoke Board 1, August 1G, 1918. No. 42464.— Protest 849267 of J. W. Coulston & Co. (New York). Tuscan Red — ^Protest Claims. Brown, General Appraiser: The record here shows that the mer- chandise, known as Tuscan red, consists of a coal-tar color lake com- posed of oxide of iron containing about 4 per cent of aniline color. It was classified as a coal-tar color lake at 30 per cent ad valorem 7^ and 5 cents per pound under section 500 (Group III) and section 501 of Title V, act of September 8, 1916. In a memorandum filed by him the protestant claims that the mer- chandise is dutiable at 10 per cent as oxide of iron, and refers to certain analyses supplied by the shippers, claiming that said analyses do not indicate an aniline color nor a color lake, and argues that it does not possess the characteristics of a color lake and is not used as a lake. This issue, however, is not raised by the protest, no such claim being made therein. Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United States (2 C. A. E., 159; 20 Treas. Dec, 1259). To tlie claims of the protest the importer must be confined in a proceeding to recover duties whicli he alleges have been unlawfuUv imposed and exacted. Davies v. Arthur (7 Fed. Cas., 43; affirmed in 9G U. S., 140). Neither can the importer be permitted to amend his protest after the time provided by law for making it has expired. In re Sherman (49 Fed., 224; affirmed in 55 Fed., 276). It is also necessary for the importer, after protest, to establish by competent proof before the board the correctness of his claim. Claims made in his protest or in his brief do not themselves have the force or effect of evidence. United States v. Hogan (5 C. A. E., 1; 25 Treas. Dec, 657). And ex parte affidavits are not competent evidence. United States v. Freese Co. (4 C. A. E., 271; 2i Treas. Dec 889). The claim in the protest reads : We desire reliquidation under section 500, Group III (3) as colors manufac- tured in whole or in part of products provided for in Group I at 30 per cent ad valorem, as the aniline content (4 per cent) of these goods belongs to the naphthalene class, which as shown under Group I is on the free list. The merchandise, on the record before us, being a color lake manu- factured in part from a coal-tar product provided for in either Group I or Group II (sec 500). act of 1916, falls within the provision of Group III for "color lakes * * * when * * * manufac- tured in whole or in part from any of the products provided for in Groups I and II." and is also subject to the special duty of 5 cents per pound prescribed by the provision of section 501 " upon all arti- cles mentioned in Group III " with certain specified exceptions. In view of the expression in Group III, " manufactured in part,'" it is unnecessary to discuss what percentage of coal-tar product is used in making the colors, color lakes, or other articles x^rovided for therein. Note Abstract 42413 covering somewhat similar merchandise. For the above reasons the protest is overruled. Befoke Boaed 1, August 16, 1918. No. 42465.— Protests 826475, etc., of Favor, Ruhl & Co. (New York). Artists' Colors. — Artists' colors consisting of coal tar or alizarin lakes put up in tubes, classified under section 500, Group III, and section 501, act of September 8, 1916, are claimed dutiable as artists' colors or color lakes at 20 per cent under paragraph 63, tariif act of 1913. 79 Opinion by Browx, G. A. On the authority oi G. A. 8110 (T. D. 37429) the artists' colors in question ■s^•cre held properly classified under the act of September 8. 191G. Before Boakd 1, August 1G, 193 S. No. 42466.— Protest S1S020 of D. C. Andrews & Co. (New York). MoxoMET — PHOTOGKArHixG Chemicals. — " MonoiTiet," classified as a photographic chemical manufactured from coal tar at 30 per cent ad valorem plus 5 cents per pound under the provisions of sections 500 and 501, Group III, act of September 8, 1916, is claimed more specifically provided for as a chemical compound at 15 per cent under paragraph 5, tariff act of 1913. Opinion by Browx, General Appraiser. The monomet in question was found to be a chemical compound derived from coal tar and that it is used for developing photographs. It was held properly classi- fied as a photographic chemical under the act of September 8, 1916. (T. D. 37790— G. A. 8197.) Na'phthdleiie. 1. The ascertainment of wlietlier naphtbaleue falls within the provisions of sec- tion 500. Group I or Group II. of tlie act of September S. 1916, requil'es an accurate scientific test as to tlie solidifying point, and if it has a solidifying point of 79° C. or more, it is dutiable ;is provided therein. 2. The tests to ascertain such fact are strictly scientific, as only by such methods c;in the true solidifying point be known. 3. In this case the instruments used and the metbod piirsued by tbe Government analyst conform to the scientific process necessary to accurately ascertain the solidifying point. United States General Appraisers, New York, October 9, 1918. In the matter of protest 848787 of F. B. Vandogrift & Co. against the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of Philadelphia. [Affirmed.] Peter Hachctt for the importers. Bert Hanson, Assistant Attorney General {Thomas F. TumiiUi/, special attor- ney), for the United States. Before Board 1 (McCi^lland, Sullivan, and Brown, General Appraisers; Bkown, G. a., concurring). SuLLivAx, General Appraiser: The merchandise involved in this protest consists of naphthalene. It was assessed with duty at 15 per cent ad valorem and 2^ cents per pound under the provisions therefor in sections 500 and 501, Group II, act of September 8. 1916. It is contended by the protestants that the merchandise is free of duty under Group I of the same act. This Avas a Philadelphia importation, and the fact at issue was whether or not the naphthalene under consideration had a solidif}'- ing point over or under 79° C. Three experts testified as to the degree at which it solidified. On the part of the protestants Mr, Mor- 80 rison placed the solidifying point at 78.95° and Mr. Carlitz at 76.40°. Mr. Roberts, the Government analyst, placed the solidifying point at 79.1° C. To arrive at the weight to be given to these findings requires careful examination of the testimony. It should be kept in mind that the merchandise consists of dry flakes, and to ascertain the solidifying point requires that these flakes be reduced to a liquid. Mr. Morrison's test is described in his testimony as follows : * * * Melt the material In tlie tube ; suspend a thermometer in it and in- close in another vessel to get the air away ; stir it until the thermometer no longer goes down — is stationary ; and then wait for it to rise ; it rises a tenth, or two or three tenths, as the case may be; and that is what is called the solidifying point. We call it the titer. He claims that this method is the usual and customary one for ascertainins the solidifying point in the trade and commerce of the country, but states it is used principally in determining the value of fats. In arriving at the solidifj^ing point his thermometer is not completely submerged. He states: I had this thermometer standardized at a submersion of 50 ; I had it sub- merged to the 50. ^ ****** * Q The remainder of it was exposed? — A. Yes. Q Did you ever use a test where the thermometer is entirely submerged? Did you ever see it? — A. I never heard of it; they don't do it commercially. Mr. Carlitz used an entirely different method, but claims it would produce the same result as the method used by Mr. Morrison. As to his method he testifies : I took a capillary tube, sealed at one end, and introduced the previously dried and finely ground naphthalene to a depth of about a quarter of an inch or a little less and that capillarv was attached to a thermometer by means of a platinum wire, and both of those were immersed in sulphuric acid con- tained in a beaker. I tried the experiment in several forms. This is the form, as I recall I ui^ed on which the report was based. Now, then, I heated the sulphuric acid gentlv, with the stand, stirring until the material melted, and then I removed the"^ flame and continued my stirring and carefully observed the naphthalene until it solidified, and took that as the solidifying point and reported that point. He stated that the method used by Mr. Morrison as outlined was more applicable to fats, but he believed the result was practically the same. He further stated that the naphthalene was placed in a small capillarv attached to a thermometer: that he stirred the liquid, but not the naphthalene ; that the thermometer was stationary ; and that there would not be any supercooling in his method. His testimony then continues as follows : Q How much naphthalene did you have?— A. A depth of a quarter of an inch. Q. What weight?— A. The weight was very, very small; I dare say perhaps a tenth of a gram. Mr. Roberts, the Government analyst, described the method used by him as follows : ^ That test was a test for the solidifying point of the sample ; after being well mixed as received— vou are refeiTing now, I take it, to the mark JOR— this sample tested by me 79.1° C. * * * The sample was thoroughly mixed; in- troduced into the inner tube of an apparatus known as Roih melting point apparatus, which consists of a long, narrow test tube about 10 to 12 inches 81 Ions antl five-eighths to three-quarters of an inch in diameter. All but the upper inch (approximately an inch of it) is surrounded by a larger glass jacket, some inch and a quarter in diameter, the lower part of which jacket is ex- panded to a bulb slightly larger; the inner tube is open at the upper end, and the jacket Is tubulated with a ground-glass opening fitted with a glass stopcock adapting it to receive a jacket of water. The naphthalene is introduced in the dried, solid condition into the inner tube, which I have called a test tube, to suflicient depth so that as soon as it is melted it will occupy a depth of not less than 3 or 4 inches in the tube, care being talvcn not to permit the melting temperature to exceed a few degrees above the actual melting point of the naphthalene. A thermometer of such length as to permit all of the porticm of it that is used to be immersed below the upper level of the water in the water jacket, and such thermometer being carefully standardized and accompanied by a certificate of corrections from the United States Bureau of Standards, such a thermometer is immersed so that the bulb \vill stand centrally in the melted naphthalene. There is also placed in the melted naphthalene a thin metal wire bent at the lower end into a ring to form to permit of stirring up an up-and-down motion ; and during the entire opei-ation and observation the molten naphthalene is stirred with such rod. The thermometer is observed at short intervals of time, one-half minute usually, and readings are taken until it reaches— until the observed temperature reaches the lowest point, rises slightly and becomes constant for a period of several minutes, fi-equeutly as much as 10 minutes. The observed temperature used for purpose of report is that which is found at the point .where this temperature is constant. That temperature is further corrected by any error that may be in the tJiermometer and for errors in the exposed portions of the stem. , The, final figure thus obtained is the figure reported here. ' ■ ' "" . We set out these methods fully in order that it ma^^ be ascertained ^vhich is the most accurate in determining the point at which the naphthalene solidifies. In this record the question arises, Was it not the intent of the statute that the test to determine the solidifying point of the naphtha- lene be a scientific one ? The statute provides, " * * * naphtha- lene having a solidifying point less than 79° C, * * *." It would seem as though in a provision of law where the question as to whether merchandise should or should not be subject to duty depends on the point at which it solidifies, the determination of such question should be by the most accurate method possible. The nature of the merchandise, and the clearness of the language used in the statute leave no doubt in our mind that the method of ascertaining such solidifying point should be as nearly perfect as science could devise. Admittedly the method used by Mr, Carlitz could not be followed. In the first instance, his liquid always remains constant. The quan- tity is extremely small. The method pursued by Mr. Morrison, by reason af the fact that portions of the thermometer were exposed, does not meet Avith our approval. In his testimony it is disclosed that the test he made prior to the correction was 0.38 of a degree higher than that reported. The test that he used is called the titer test, and its merit consists in it being more expeditious than the test used by the Government. The record discloses that if a portion of the thermometer is exposed it will have a tendency to lower the degree of the solidifying point. The method adopted by the Gov- ernment analyst produced ^9.2° as the solidifying point, but as stated by Mr. Roberts, in making the correction on the thermometer as pro- vided by the Bureau of Standards, 0.1 was subtracted. It then left the solidifying point as 79.1^.j;;f, ' ."/^ ';'^^j\ 94582—18- 6 .q^ihA 'U^ 82 The following is Mr. Roberts's testimony with reference to the method pursued by Mr. Morrison : Q. Have you ever seen chemists' reports for tests similar to tlie test testified to by Mr. Morrison for ttiis? — A. That is a common commercial way of taking the titer test for fats. This merchandise was not a fat, and while it may be that the titer method would give fair results it would not reach as accurate a con- clusion as the method pursued by Mr. Roberts. Mr. Morrison was required under the laws of physics to make an allowance for the emergent stem. Mr. Roberts did not have an exposed stem. His thermometer was entirel}' submerged. On being recalled, Mr. Morrison testified : Q. In stating your method pur>;ued here and giving your test, did you make an allowance for the emersion of the stem? — A. Yes, 0.38 of a degree; that is, for the emergence, the part of the stem that is outside. Q. How did you arrive at what percentage to allow? — A. I had the ther- mometer tested by the Precision Thermometer Co., and they compared it with the Bureau of Standards thermometer. * * * They gave me a tenth, the same as the Bureau of Standards, and I made the correction for that tem- perature. Q. (By General Appraiser Brown.) Which way did you make it? — A. I sub- tracted it. Q. In other words, your own reading would have made it freeze higher than the figure you reported in the testimony before? — A. Yes, sir. Q. Wouldn't the emergent stem have made it freeze at a lower place? — A. I don't know whether it was the emergence, or whether the thermometer was not correct, but that is the correction to make at that temperature. Q. You don't know whether that is a correction for the emergence?— A. I just asked them to standardize it for a submergence of 50, because that is what I have to use in my apparatus. We need not go into an analysis of the phenomena of freezing, and -whether or not every body under the same pressure is solidified at a fixed temperature. There are certain general rules that are well stated in Ganot's Physics. He states (p. 368) : * * * Solidification or congelation is the passage of a body from the liquid to the solid state. This phenomenon is expressed by the two following laws: ^ , , 1. Every body under the same pressure solidifies at a fixed temperature, which is the same as that of fusion. 2. From the commencement to the end of the solidification the temperature ■of a liquid remains constant. Certain bodies, more especially some of the fats, present an exception to the first law. in so far that by repeated fusions they seem to undergo a molecular change which alters their melting point. , ^ ,. , ^ The second law is the consequence of the fact that the latent heat absorbed during fusion becomes free at the moment of solidification. The freezing point of pure water can be lowered by several degrees, if the water is previously freed from air by boiling and is then kept in a perfectly ; still place. * * * It will be observed that Mr. Carlitz's method was to keep the fluid perfectly still. On the other hand, Mr. Roberts kept it in motion. Ganot further states: In fact it may be cooled to —15° C, and even lower, without freezing. But when it is agitated or comes in contact with a particle of ice, the liquid, or a part of it, at once solidifies. Here is the kernel of the nut. What the law contemplated is : At what point does this naphthalene solidify in the ordinary way, and aoes the method used by Mr. Roberts of keeping it constantly infl 83 motion more accurately arrive at the solidifying point than that of Mr. Carlitz or Mr. ^Morrison? The record satisjQes us that the test applied by the Government analvst more nearly arrived at the correct point of solidification than either of the tests offered by the importers. The protest is overruled, and the decision of the collector affirmed. Bkown, General Appraiser: I concur in the result. Bkfoke Board 1, October 9, 191S. No. 42608.— Protest 85037S of Standard Forwarding Co. (New York). Cresol. — Cresol, or cresylic acid, classified as a coal-tar distillate at 15 per cent ad valorem"^ and 2^ cents per pound under Group II, sections 500 and 501 of the act of 1916, is clauned free of duty as creosol under Group I, section 500, of the same act. Opinion by Browx, G. A. From an analysis of the sample it was found that the merchandise contained 2.6 per cent of phenol. It was held free of duty under Group I, section 500. G. A. 8192 (T. D. 37740) followed. Befobe Board 1, November 21, 1918. No. 42719. — Protests 850113, etc.. of Condensite Co. of America et al. (New York). Cresol. — Cresol, cresylic acid, or liquid carbolic acid, classified at 15 per cent ad valorem and 2^ cents per pound under Group II, sec- tions 500 and 501 of the act o^f 1916, are claimed free of duty under the provision for cresol in Group I, section 500, of the same act. Opinion by Brown, G. A. The merchandise in question was found to be tar acids the same as that covered by G. A. 8192 (T. D. 37740). It was held free of duty under Group I, section 500. O THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY WILL INCREASE TO SO CENTS ON THE FOURTH DAY AND TO $1.00 ON THE SEVENTH DAY OVERDUE. ^^m- ^^ 1939 UBRART U S E '' ^ 'N 14 1930 i ^ov 1 1 958 •^ECO i-^ mMMM& >'.QV I t 29 1943 LIBRARY USE RECRfVED ''ML g 1053 fii;C2 9'66-4PM ^^ LOAN DEPT. -KEiyf8>*St^- OCT 2 8^3^ LOAN A»»C LD 21-95m-7,'37 YC 08914 393187 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY