ANDREW KLOMAN OUT OF WHOSE LITTLE FORGE GREW THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY The Inside History of the Carnegie Steel Company A Romance of Millions By JAMES HOWARD BRIDGE ..- ' I.-'-."...'. NEW YORK THE ALDINE BOOK COMPANY 32-34 LAFAYETTE PLACE COPYRIGHT, 1903, BY JAMES HOWARD BRIDGE Published, July, 1903 Entered at Stationers' Hall, London, England Fourth Edition. (Sixteenth Thousand) TO RECALL THEIR FORGOTTEN SERVICES of a <$reat Business is DrDtcatrt) tfje pemon> of the Men who Founded it y Saved if from early Disaster , <2#;/ w0# its First Successes : ANDREW KLOMAN DAVID McCANDLESS WILLIAM COLEMAN THOMAS MORRISON CARNEGIE WILLIAM R. JONES WILLIAM P. SHINN DAVID A. STEWART HENRY M. CURRY AUTHOR'S NOTE TO THE THIRD EDITION To meet certain criticisms which have been made concern- ing the propriety of his publishing this book, Mr. Bridge wishes to say that he was never Mr. Carnegie's "private secretary" as that term is usually understood. For several years he assisted Mr. Carnegie in literary work, especially in the preparation of Triumphant Democracy ; and during this time he had neither the opportunity nor the inclination to learn the business secrets of the steel companies. This book does not contain a single fact that was acquired by Mr. Bridge in a confidential capacity; nor has any fact been included that was improperly obtained by anyone else. PREFACE THIS book is the outcome of a magazine article undertaken at an editor's request. Having spent a number of years in the closest intimacy with one of the owners of the great steel works, and enjoyed exceptional opportunities of becoming acquainted with the men who had wrought their success, I entertained lit- tle doubt as to my fitness for the task. So recalling the stories I had heard the partners tell, and adding a few I found in the writings of Andrew Carnegie, I wrote my article, and found I had enough material left for a couple more. These also were written, and in due time published. To my surprise they brought an avalanche of dissent and protest. From distant Oregon and near-by Meadville, from Pittsburg and New York, came word from unknown corre- spondents that my conventional story was only a repetition of similar publishings, all faulty and all designed to glorify some individual at the expense of his associates. One letter con- tained an expression so vigorous that it has won a place for itself in this book : " They have filched their laurel wreaths from the tombs of the dead." Another assured me that what I had deemed honorable success was but the outcome of " Macchiavel- lian astuteness." I was told by one who had played an impor- tant part in the early history of the enterprise that "the bad faith, treachery, and chicanery that lie at the bottom of many great fortunes had their parallel in the history of the Carnegie interests." " Dear me ! " sighed an unknown Pittsburg corre- spondent, "the humbug of greatness is so grotesque in the careers of those we know that it makes one wonder at the acci- dents which happen to men accidents which elevate mediocrity vi PREFACE and the commonplace to Olympian heights. " In other letters were references to "porcine proclivities," " pachyderm entities," "a vainglorious medley of contradictions." Under this interesting stimulus I determined to go to Pitts- burg and stay there until I had got at the core of things Carnegian. My experience was at once a disappointment and an encouragement. With documentary proof before me I found that almost every man who had written a line about the events I was investigating had blundered; one in dates, another in sequence of happenings, a third in the placing of credit for in- ventions and improvements; and of them all I found Andrew Carnegie's own narrative the least trustworthy. Knowing how excellent is his verbal memory, it puzzled me to find him mis- taking his own birth-year; claiming to have been the first in America to operate the Bessemer process of steel-making; to have originated iron railway bridges; to have been the founder of the business that bears his name ; to have been ever on the alert to adopt new processes and mechanical improvements ; to have maintained without a break the friendliest of relations with his partners ; to have been the principal factor in the gigantic growth of the business; to have fervently tried to carry his high ideals concerning labor into his own works. Instead of this I everywhere found proof of the contrary ; and when, finally, I was notified that I must agree to submit my manu- script to the usual Carnegie revision before I could count on any assistance of the present officers of the company, my disillu- sionment was complete*. But it made my work more interesting. To write a 'con- ventional history from the official records of the company, with the aid of the company's press agent and under the guidance of an official censor, was a thing any journalistic fledgling could do. To dig into the secrets of the great corporation, to expose its enormous profits, reveal its peculiar business methods, its ways of heading off competitors, its internal strife, to get its first annual reports and even its later balance sheets, and to do PREFACE vii all this openly and without a bribe or the betrayal of a con- fidence, to involve no employee in a covert act or breach of faith this was a task of no small difficulty. It is for the reader to judge of my success. Thus disadvantaged, I have not hesitated to use personal letters and private documents as I might not otherwise' have done. Whenever an interesting fact has come to my knowledge, properly authenticated, I have used it without regard to its im- plications. Yet I have stated nothing that cannot be verified. Often I have risked being tedious in order to quote a corrobo- rative document. In other cases I have kept the proofs by me in case my accuracy should be called into question. From this independence has resulted a narrative more-truth- ful than it could otherwise have been. Had the official repre- sentatives of the Carnegie Steel Company revised this story, it is certain that many of the statements it contains would never have seen the light of day. More than once the company has accepted a large monetary loss rather than disclose its secrets in court. If, therefore, this book has any value it owes it to its frankness. While the author expects censure for some of his revelations, he is willing to accept it in the cause of truth. The conventional history of the concern, based on benevolent aphorisms and platitudinous maxims about thrift, industry, gen- ius, and super-commercial morality, has been written a hundred times, and will probably be written again and again. The Carnegie Steel Company, as will be seen from this narrative, is not the creation of any man, nor indeed of any set of men. It is a natural evolution ; and the conditions of its growth are of the same general character as those of the " flower in the crannied wall. " Andrew Carnegie has somewhere said, in effect : Take away all our money, our great works, ore-mines, and coke-ovens, but leave our organization, and in four years I shall have re-established myself. He might have gone a step further and eliminated himself and his organization ; and in less than four years the steel industry would have recovered from viii PREFACE the loss. This is not the popular conception of industrial evo- lution, which demands captains, corporals, and other heroes; but it accords with evolutionary conceptions in general. This inevitableness of industrial growth is frankly recog- nized by the most far-seeing but least talkative member of the group. " The demands of modern life," says Mr. Frick, " called for such works as ours ; and if we had not met the demands others would have done so. Even without us the steel industry of the country would have been just as great as it is, though men would have used other names in speaking of its leaders." This is a frank acknowledgment, from one of themselves, that the kings of industrialism have no divine right. Little is here said on the subject of the tariff. The book is neither a protectionist's pleading nor a free-trader's argument. It is simply the story of the growth of a great industry, and the author deems his mission fulfilled in setting forth the facts as he finds them, leaving the reader free to make his own deductions. As this is not a political tract, neither is it an ethical trea- tise; and the author considers it no part of his duty either to extenuate or accentuate the lapses from a high moral plane which may occasionally have been suffered by some of the in- dividuals whose efforts are here described. The men who were instrumental in building up this great business were, originally at least, none of them philanthropists. There was hardly a step in their progress which had not the impulse of unqualified selfishness ; and if, in the light of retrospection, some of their actions seem inconsistent with a book morality, it must be remembered that in the fight for industrial life, as in that ear- lier struggle for physical existence, the victory is not to the gen- tle and the tender-hearted, but to the others. No great business has yet been built on the beatitudes; and it is not all cynicism that condenses a negative decalogue into a positive exhortation to be successful " somehow ! " CONTENTS CHAPTER I THE HUMBLE BEGINNING 1853-1863 : The little Kloman forge in Girty's Run Excellent work- manship of the Kloman brothers Thomas N. Miller and Henry Phipps join them Notable extension of business Prosperity brought by the war A new mill is built at Twenty-ninth Street Renewed prosperity Anthony Kloman sells out Quarrel among the partners, .......... j. CHAPTER II "A MOST HAZARDOUS ENTERPRISE" 1863-65 : Andrew Carnegie enters as peacemaker Some particulars of his life Hir, efforts produce fresh discord Makes agreement un- der which Miller is forced out Thomas M. Carnegie gets an in- terest Miller and Andrew Carnegie start a rival mill at Thirty- third Street Its failure Consolidation of the two mills into Union Iron Mills Company Andrew Carnegie's disappointment Reproaches Miller for getting him into the iron business Calls it a "most hazardous enterprise ", ....... 13 CHAPTER III EARLY STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES 1865 : Phipps and Carnegie go on foreign tour and leave the business Its narrow escape from disaster T. M. Carnegie saves it Will- iam Coleman's helpful advice Phipps' trials on his return Un^ fortunate outside venture Andrew Carnegie's quarrel with Miller His depreciation of the enterprise Purchases Miller's stock The first labor strike Importations of foreign workmen Inge- nuity of a German He shows Kloman how to build a " Universal Mill" Andrew Carnegie's resistance to innovations " Pioneering don't pay" Opposes the great slabbing-mill Its excellent work Kloman's inventive genius Economies of Mr. Phipps Brings in John Walker, his brother-in-law Forms company to buy Twenty-ninth Street mill Wilson, Walker & Co. Advantages of the change, 25 ix x CONTENTS CHAPTER IV IRON RAILWAY BRIDGES 1865 : Formation of the Keystone Bridge Company Incorporates pre- vious business of Piper & S hi frier Andrew Carnegie's claims as a pioneer His strange mistakes Character of Piper Iron used in bridges a hundred years before Carnegie Early iron railroad bridges Commercial morals and early railroad management Officials and outside interests Influential backing of the Key- stone Bridge Company Its early prosperity A balance sheet Recent losses, ........... 39 CHAPTER V A RIVALRY OF GREAT FURNACES 1872 : Schemes for iron-smelting Phipps and associates invited to join them Coleman advises construction of independent furnace Lucy furnace built Enters upon long rivalry with the Isabella Interesting struggle for supremacy Remarkable achievements Description of old-time methods Great services of H. M. Curry Inventor Whitwell's improvements Valuable discovery by Mr. Phipps His close trading Disagreements of partners Kloman's unfortunate venture The panic of 1873 On the brink of bank- ruptcy Kloman leaves the firm Record of the furnaces, . . 54 CHAPTER VI BEGINNINGS AND GROWTH OF THE STEEL BUSINESS 1875 : Erroneous histories published of this event Vanity of supposed founders Filching of laurel wreaths from dead men's graves Coleman the real founder Secures option, with T. M. Carnegie, of the Braddock site Gets his friends interested The elder Car- negie's opposition Sees progress of Bessemer steel in England Returns enthusiastic and joins the enterprise Helpfulness of Colonel Scott and Mr. J. Edgar Thomson Curious result of strike at Tohnstown Captain Jones made superintendent His remark-- able ability Letter exemplifying his broad views Causes of suc- cess Discrimination in freight rates Shinn's methods of ac- countingDisagreements of partners They lead to construction of blast-furnaces Wonderful records made in smelting Also in converting works and rail-mill Consternation in England, . 71 CHAPTER VII SOME INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY 1875-1888 : Secrecy hitherto maintained concerning profits No longer necessary First cost sheets and profits Andrew Carnegie's en- thusiasm Forty-one per cent, dividends Carnegie's prophecy of enormous profits Results even more astonishing One hundred CONTENTS xi and forty per cent, in one year Beneficent effects of the tariff A golden stream of dividends First published statement of yearly profits Where credit is due Services of Holley, Jones, Shinn Jones' story of rivalries-^Part played by different partners Mc- Candless, T. M. Carnegie, Stewart, Andrew Carnegie How the advertising was done, 94 CHAPTER VIII QUARRELS AND "EJECTURES" Internal discord Dropping out of partners Andrew Carnegie's am- bition Interesting letter Coleman leaves Then Kloman Thomas M. Scott Death of McCandless Shinn 's departure Re- sulting lawsuit Story of the dispute and arbitration Scott's ejecture Carnegie's "foresight "Consolidation with Lucy Fur- naces Important letters from Scott and Shinn Cost and earnings of the works 117 CHAPTER IX A GLANCE AT PROCESSES General prevalence of iron ore Primitive smelting processes How modern blast-furnaces are operated The hot-blast Use of coke How it is made Why lime is added The puddling process Cast and wrought iron The direct process of Bessemer steel-mak- ing The Jones mixer The converter Brilliant pyrotechnics Open-hearth steel process Its rapid growth, . . . .136 CHAPTER X THE RISE AND GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD 1879: Establishment of Amity Homestead byjohn McClure Kloman's rival rail-mill Joined by the Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Company Pathetic death of Kloman His uninterrupted influence on Car- negie enterprises Excellent mill and poor management^Trouble with labor ; leads to disagreements in the company ; and final sale to the Carnegies "Carnegie luck" Extensions and improve- ments Julian Kennedy's skill Wonderful mechanical perfec-^ tion Purchase of the Carrie furnaces, . . . . . /. 150 CHAPTER XI THE INCOMING OF HENRY CLAY FRICK 1882 : The enterprise attains its majority Ill-proportioned growth Lacks mental development Frick gives coherency and definite- ness to plans Gathers scattered plants into perfected organiza- tion Previous attempts at consolidation Frick' s extraordinary career His development of the coke industry His great fore- sight Executive and organizing genius Henceforth the most imposing figure in this history, 167 xii CONTENTS CHAPTER XII THE CAPTURE OF THE DUQUESNE STEEL WORKS 1889: Prick's remarkable feat of financiering Extensive works bought without the outlay of a dollar ; they pay for themselves in a year Story of their construction ; similar to that of Homestead Splendidly equipped, badly managed Labor troubles Car- negie heads them off desirable contracts Extraordinary methods of competition Discouragement of shareholders Prick's clever bargaining Amazing success ; buys works for bond issue and pays bonds six times over from profits Their later development Enthusiasm of local editor, 174 CHAPTER XIII LABOR CONTESTS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Some moral causes of Homestead strike Utopianism versus business The puddler's strike of 1867 The threatened trouble of 1875 at Edgar Thomson No sentimentality Strike at Beaver Falls ; a frank attempt to crush the labor-union Bad business policy An- drew Carnegie's idealistic publishings "Thou shalt not take thy neighbor's job " Incident in the washerwomen's strike Pander- ing to the Knights of Labor ; its effects Strike at Edgar Thom- son works; and employment of Pinkertons The coke strike of 1887; Carnegie's way of settling it Charges of bad faith ; their justification Renewed disorder in the coke regions The troubles at Homestead in 1889 Description of the hardships of the work- men Carnegie's embarrassing talks for publication His cousin illustrates with a parable Unfortunate settlement at leads to further difficulties The labor-unions' joy, S*) CHAPTER XIV THE HOMESTEAD BATTLE 1892 : Andrew Carnegie's chagrin Prepares for war Stern meas- ures planned Secret instructions to Prick Prick tries concilia- tion ; its failure Statement of the differences Small number of men affected Closing of the works Strikers assume military organization ; depose municfpal authorities ; other arbitrary acts Sheriff powerless in presence of mob law The company's at- tempt to land watchmen An all-day battle on the river Barbar- ous use of dynamite and burning oil "No quarter to scabs" Story of an eye-witness Surrender of the Pinkerton guards ; brutal treatment of the wounded and defenceless Homestead in a state of insurrection The calling out of the National Guard, . 203 CHAPTER XV ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION OF MR. PRICK Furious attack on the chairman ; a desperate struggle in the office Thrice shot and repeatedly stabbed, Mr. ^Frick makes a fight for his life He saves the assassin from summary punishment His CONTENTS xiii magnificent display of courage His tender thought of Mrs. Frick World-wide excitement The punishment of mutiny in the sol- diers' camp Carnegie at beautiful Loch Rannoch ; denies himself to reporters The interference of politicians Carnegie's cable- gram to Whitelaw Reid Newspaper comment in Europe and America Severe condemnation of Carnegie Prick's unceremo- nious return to business, ......... 224 CHAPTER XVI THE AFTERMATH OF WAR Resumption of work at Homestead under protection of militia Sympa- thetic strikes at other Carnegie mills World's interest in Home- stead storm-centre Incidents of camp life and in the mills Con- gressional investigations W. T. Stead's garbled reports The Knights of Labor on Carnegie idealism "Thou shalt not take thy neighbor's job" Despairing violence of the strikers Attempts at wholesale poisoning of non-union men Conviction of the crimi- nals Withdrawal of the militia; renewed violence Schwab's conciliatory influence Carnegie opens another library Poetical effusions in honor and condemnation The Republican debacle Anger of the protectionists against Frick and Carnegie Some good results of the conflict Carnegie's return His repudiation of responsibility, and praise of Frick * 236 CHAPTER XVII A RELUCTANT SUPREMACY 1892-99: Consolidation of Carnegie works ; effect of industrial war The Union Railroad Romantic story of acquisition of Mesaba ore- fields Due to Henry W. Oliver Carnegie's opposition ; leads to coldness with Frick Interesting letters Alliance with the Rocke- fellers Carnegie's renewed opposition; his amusing prophecy- Free gift of many millions Frick's railroad projects Purchase of a line to Lake Erie ; its economical operation Oliver's project for Lake steamers adopted The company become self-sufficing A perfect industrial unit 254 CHAPTER XVIII THE WORKINGS OF THE CORPORATE MIND 1899 : The mental evolution of an industrial organism Workings of machines watched and tabulated, but no regular record kept of Board of Managers Mr. Frick's changes Weekly lunches estab- lished and full reports kept of deliberations Spirit of good-fellow- ship supplants unfriendly rivalries Secrecy concerning business discussed Official record of such a meeting Purchase of Bethle- hem machinery Important and costly additions New partners admitted ; subject to the iron-clad agreement Steel car works xiv CONTENTS projected Conneaut pipe works recommended An interesting contract Arbitration versus litigation Conneaut furnaces planned Various reports The reorganization of the company, . 275 CHAPTER XIX THE ZENITH OF PROSPERITY Carnegie's attempt to sell out to English investors in 1889 ; prompted by reduced profits ; its failure Great increase in gains under Mr. Prick's management An amazing record Secret figures revealed How these results were reached Rapid extensions at principal works The Frick Coke Company ; the use of its credit to finance the Carnegie concern Fresh attempts to sell out Carnegie's esti- mates of values and future profits Plans a reorganization ; in- volves retirement of Frick Fresh overtures for purchase The famous option; bonus $1,170,000 Break in money market ; fail- ure of the syndicate's plans Carnegie refuses extension of option Impressive description of the company and its amazing profits Schwab's enthusiasm over future prospects; rails $12 a ton England out of the race Other plans of reorganization ; failure of them all, , . . 293 CHAPTER XX CARNEGIE'S ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK Born of a quarrel, the company reaches its final form through conten- tion Causes of Carnegie's animosity Intolerance of rivalship Early effort to diminish Frick's prominence Differences concern- ing price of coke Chagrin over the syndicate's failure to complete purchase Ridiculous publication by Stead Annoyances caused by advertisers The coke contract Carnegie's insinuation Frick's resentment The matter becomes official Entry in min- utes of company Carnegie tries to win Walker to his side Schwab refuses to transmit Carnegie offer Frick's resignation Carnegie not satisfied ; gives his orders to managers ; their reluc- tance to act Schwab's difficult position Frick resists attempt to force him to sell out ; Lovejoy and Phipps side with him^Equity suit instituted Frick's pleadings and Carnegie's rejoinder Peace overtures Conference at Atlantic City 316 CHAPTER XXI THE FAILURE OF THE IRON-CLAD Validity of the iron-clad agreement Its history Devised for control of debtor partners Interest revocable New iron-clad of 1892 Phipps' energetic opposition to it ; not signed by senior partners Agreement of 1897 ; signed only by Carnegie Renewed refusal of Phipps to sign Agreement lies dormant until revived to meet Frick case Extraordinary ritual to make it effective The docu- CONTENTS xv ment quoted Schwab's compliance to Carnegie's orders; Love- joy's independence Protests of Phipps and Frick Attempt proves abortive, 336 CHAPTER XXII THE ATLANTIC CITY COMPROMISE The training of junior partners Lovejoy the only one to resist ; his independence helps to a settlement ; draws up agreement of con- ciliationThe Board meets at Atlantic City ; adopts Lovejoy agree- ment Final transformation of Carnegie Steel Company Con- . solidation with the Frick Coke Company Enormous capitalization The return of peace The Society of Carnegie Veterans, . . 346 CHAPTER XXIII THE BILLION-DOLLAR FINALE Prick's plans for Conneaut tube works ; revived by Carnegie to force jmrchase The famous bankers' dinner Schwab's speech ; bless- ings of industrial peace Morgan impressed Carnegie's skilful diplomacy Sale to Steel Trust Price paid Growth of Kloman's little business ; from less than $5,000 to nearly $500,000,000, . 358 APPENDIX Some extracts from the pleadings of Henry C. Frick in the equity suit. , 365 THE HISTORY; ......*.../; OF THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY THE HUMBLE BEGINNING IN 1858 a small forge was started at ^N*V Girty's Run in Millvale, Duquesne Borough, now a part of Alle- gheny. It stood on the edge of the straggling village, and a muddy road ran past f^^Kpegpc it along the river - bank. M||AJ:. Judged by modern standards it was an insignificant affair, with a little engine and a wooden trip-hammer that first cumbrous mechanical substitute for the sledge-hammer. The building was a light wooden construction, about a hundred feet long and seventy wide ; but even in these narrow limits the scanty machinery seemed at first lost It had been brought from the basement of a near-by dwelling where the business was started five years before. In the course of time the vacant corners and empty spaces were gradually filled with axle-bars, small forgings, and iron scrap of various kinds, and the place took on a busy air. The men who owned this little shop were typical black- smiths, deep-chested, muscular fellows, who had grown up in the light of the smithy and the music of the anvil. They were Andrew Klowman and his brother Anton, who had come from i i 2 THE HUMBLE BEGINNING Treves ^ih Prussia a few years before. In time the superfluous " w " of their name was dropped, and Anton became Anthony. This: little place, which its owners valued, good-will and stock, at $4,800, was the beginning of one of the greatest in- dustrial aggregates in the world, valued and bought, forty-three years later, for nearly five hundred million dollars ! In character the Kloman brothers were very different. Andrew was a steady, plodding man of preternatural gravity, earnest in his manner and watchful of every detail of cost and A German trip-hammer. From the American Manufacturer. profit. Anthony, although the elder, had no high sense of responsibility. He was careless and free with both money and time; and the beer-can was often raised to his perspiring face. Andrew preferred water, not only as costing less, but as leaving him in better shape for bargaining. And in little things he was a shrewd bargainer. He had been trained in a school where a pfennig the tenth of a cent was the unit of expendi- ture and a mark the equivalent of a dollar. Like the Prussian workmen among whom his youth had been spent, he was suspi- cious, and, at the outset of his career, more prone to insistence A THIRD INTEREST FOR $1,600 3 on his own rights than solicitous about those of others. Later, he outgrew this; but the trait led to great happenings. The workmanship of Kloman Brothers, however, was fault- less ; and they soon won a reputation for a reliable product. Their specialty was axles, which they forged out of scrap-iron, and sold to railroads and car-builders in and around Pittsburg. The peculiarity of their product was caused by alternately re- versing the direction of the fibres while forging the iron, which gave their axles a superiority soon recognized by the trade. The practice was original with Andrew Kloman. Among their clients was the Pittsburg, Fort Wayne and Chicago Railway, then called the Ohio and Pennsylvania, which had shops and offices at Allegheny. The purchasing clerk of this company was Thomas N. Miller, who was born in Allegheny in 1835 and had grown up with a group of boys who were des- tined to leave a deep impress upon the industry of their town. Miller early recognized Andrew Kloman's abilities, and fre- quently put business in his way by introductions and recom- mendations to manufacturers using axles and forgings; and a certain intimacy was thus established between them. In 1859 Kloman came to Miller, and told him that his busi- ness was growing so rapidly that, if he could get money to install a second trip-hammer, he could double his output and easily market it. He estimated the cost of this addition at $1,600; and he offered Miller a third of the profits of Kloman Brothers if he would put this sum into the business. As Miller was purchasing clerk for a company which dealt with the Kloman Brothers, he had some doubts about the propriety of directly associating himself with them ; and he so expressed himself to Kloman. " But I have a young friend," he added, " who might represent me; and if you like I'll introduce him to you." Kloman consented; and Henry Phipps was brought -into the negotiation." Henry Phipps at this time was just twenty years of age, hav- ing been born in Philadelphia on September 2/th, 1839. His THE HUMBLE BEGINNING father was a shoemaker who had moved during Henry's child- hood to Allegheny City, where he set up a little shop for him- self in Rebecca Street. At the age of thirteen young Phipps was earning a dollar and a quarter a week as general utility boy with a jeweller named Barton, who had a small shop at the cor- ner of Cherry Alley and Liberty Avenue, Pittsburg. In 1856 he entered the office of Dilworth & Bid- well, who had something to do with iron and iron spikes, and were also the local agents of the Dupont Powder Company. First he was office boy, and later became bookkeeper. In a few years the firm was dis- solved, Dilworth taking the spike-mill and Bidvvell the powder business ; and young Phipps was taken by the latter into partnership. He was, however, still bookkeeper for Dilworth & Bidwell when Miller proposed that he should take an interest in the Kloman forge. Young Phipps readily agreed to join Miller in the enterprise, and set out to raise his share of the $1,600 required by Kloman. The problem was not easy; and it was only temporarily solved when the elder Phipps agreed to mortgage his house for $Soo; for, not knowing that this $800 would grow into $50,000,000, he presently regretted his offer, and showed such distress that his son felt obliged to release him from his promise. Finally it was arranged that Miller should pay the whole of the $1,600 required by Kloman, and that Phipps should refund half of this out of his profits in the business. In return he was to have half of Miller's interest, which, for propriety's sake, was put in Young Fhipps, trudging along the canal bank on his way to Kloman's. Plate II, HENRY PHIPPS OF KLOMAN & CO.; KLOMAN & PHIPPS; CARNEGIE, PHIPPS & CO., LTD.; THE CARNEGIE STEEL CO., LTD. PROFITABLE WAR CONTRACTS 5 the name of Phipps. In addition, Phipps was to keep the Kloman books. This arrangement proved very satisfactory to all parties; and, the second trip-hammer having been installed, the business grew rapidly. Miller secured the Klomans the preference of the Fort Wayne business, and recommended them to new firms building cars for the railroad, such as Whittaker & Phillips of Toledo, Haskell & Barker of Detroit, Jessup Kennedy & Co. of Chicago, Barney Parker & Co. of Dayton, and others, from whom the bulk of their trade was soon received. Phipps, with the energy which has always characterized him, walked three miles out to the Kloman shop after his day's work at Dilworth's, posted up the books, and then trudged back along the dark towing-path of the Pennsylvania canal to his father's house on Rebecca Street. And Kloman, with his sleeves rolled up, worked with his brother and half-a-dozen men in the forge. Then the war broke out, and axles, which had been selling for two cents a pound, jumped to twelve cents a pound. And when it came to filling government orders for parts of gun-car- riages, there was no limit to price for quick deliveries. The making of railway supplies dwindled; and soon the firm was working almost exclusively on high-priced government orders. Under this stress of prosperity the primitive forge in Girty's Run was found inadequate before the war was a year old. A new and larger mill was therefore decided upon, and the firm was reorganized. Here are the articles of partnership : Articles of agreement made and concluded this sixteenth day of November, A.D. 1861, by and between Andrew and An- thony Kloman, of Duquesne Borough, of the first part, and Henry Phipps, Jr., of Allegheny City, of the second part, all of Allegheny County and State of Pennsylvania, witnesseth : That the said parties have agreed, and by these presents do agree, to associate together as equal copartners in the business of manufacturing, selling, and vending axles, iron forgings, and the rerolling of scrap into iron bar, and the general work of an iron-mill and all things pertaining thereto. 6 THE HUMBLE BEGINNING It is agreed that the style of the firm shall be Kloman and Company, of Pittsburg, Pa. The capital stock shall be $80,000, to be paid in from time to time as the wants of the business -may demand, in equal pro- portion by the said parties. It is further agreed that a full and correct inventory shall be made of the machinery on hand at present in the buildings now occupied by Kloman and Co., of Duquesne Borough, and a fair valuation shall be made thereof after the removal of the same to the new establishment ; and in case the said copartners shall not be able to agree on a valuation, then the same shall be adjusted by arbitrators, of whom the parties of the first part shall choose one, the party of the second part one, and the two so chosen shall select a third ; and the valuation arrived at shall be binding, the amount so valued shall be allowed to the said Andrew and Anthony Kloman as cash invested in the new company, and six per cent, interest shall be allowed thereon to the said Andrew and Anthony Kloman, from time to time, until the accruing profits to the party of the second part shall equal his share of the excess so admitted to Andrew and Anthony Kloman. It is further agreed that all purchases made after said ap- praisement of Andrew and Anthony Kloman's stock shall be made share and share alike individually in cash advancements, the said Andrew Kloman, the said Anthony Kloman, and the said Henry Phipps each advancing one-third of all the cash required for the business of the firm, up to the full amount of the capital stock aforementioned. It is further agreed, and to these presents the parties do bind themselves, that the said Andrew and Anthony Kloman shall not engage in any other business whatever and shall give their undivided attention and time to the business of the said copartnership, without charge or compensation, unless when travelling on business of the company, when necessary travelling expenses shall be allowed. The said Henry Phipps, Jr., shall keep the books of the firm, or exercise a supervision over them during such evenings as he can devote thereto, but he shall not be required to further exertions in the business than such time as he can consistently spare from his other engagements, and he shall lend his influ- ence so far as he can towards forwarding the interests of said copartnership. There shall be kept during the copartnership of said firm full, true, and correct books of account by double entry in regu- ARTICLES OF PARTNERSHIP y lar sets, in which shall be entered all purchases, sales, accounts, and other transactions, and the same shall be neatly kept and posted by the party of the second part, or by his direction, and shall be open at all times to the inspection of the copartners. A correct and true inventory shall be made and entered in the Stock Book on the first day of July or January of each year, and the profits and loss estimated. No purchases or sales exceeding $1,000 shall be made by any one of the said copartners to any one person or firm, with- out due consultation and approval of all parties hereto. No partner nor partners shall sign any Bond, Mortgage, Note, or any Obligation, or make any endorsement, or assume any liability, written or verbal, for the benefit of any other party, nor shall any money be loaned from the firm without the written consent of all the parties hereto. And it is further agreed that neither of the parties hereto shall sell or assign his interest in said business without the consent of all the partners being first obtained in writing. Neither party shall draw out more than his share of the profits, and the party drawing out the largest amount shall pay interest at the rate of six per cent, on the excess drawn. It is agreed that in case of the death of any parties hereto, the business of the firm shall be carried on by the surviving partners until the first of January or July following, as the case may be, when an account of stock shall be taken and profits ascertained; and the one-third of the profits and stock, after allowance of capital stock paid in by each of the partners respectively, with interest, shall be paid over to the legal heirs of the deceased partner, one-third to be paid in cash and the remainder in equal instalments of one and two years. Such copartnership shall commence on the first day of Janu- ary, A.D. 1862, and embrace all contracts and business of the present firm of Kloman and Company except their debts, and it shall continue for and during the space of five years thereafter; and if the said Henry Phipps, Jr. , shall see fit so to elect, he shall have the privilege of continuing for a further period of three or five years. And it is further agreed that at the termination of this copartnership a valuation shall be had of the real and personal property of the firm, to be arrived at as in page one of this agreement, and one-third of the amount (after allowance of original capital with interest to each partner) shall be paid to the said Henry Phipps, Jr., by Andrew and Anthony Kloman in cash, if there be that amount of money available; if not, 8 THE HUMBLE BEGINNING then so much as there is available, not less than one-third, and the balance in one and two years with interest. And it is agreed that in the event of Henry Phipps, Jr., retiring January 1st, 1867, he hereby binds himself to execute and deliver to the said Andrew and Anthony Kloman a bond in the penal sum of $10,000, conditioned that he will not engage in a similar business for the space of three years from January ist, 1867. Witness the hands and seals of the parties aforesaid the day and year above written. ANDREW KLOMAN, L.S. ANTON KLOMAN, L.S. HENRY PHIPPS, JR., L.S. Signed, sealed, and delivered in presence of As to Andrew Kloman and Henry Phipps, Jr., A. LUDWIG KOETHEN. As to Anthony Kloman, CHAS. A. BURROWS. It is eloquent of hope and self-confidence that in the clause providing for the purchase of a deceased partner's interest, only profits are mentioned. No one entertained the possibility of losses; and the event justified their faith. This clause has a further interest as the precursor of similar provisions in later articles of association, finally elaborated into the so-called " iron- clad " agreement which became so famous in the annals of the Carnegie Steel Company. An interesting annex to this document is the inventory of the first Kloman forge. It shows with indisputable exactness the humble beginnings of the business which afterwards grew to such impressive proportions. It is as follows : " One frame building situate in Duquesne Borough; one steam-engine; two hammers; one furnace; sundry tools and merchandise; one small frame house and lot." The new mill was built on a large plot of ground at Twenty-ninth Street, Pittsburg, leased from the Denny estate at an annual rental of $324 for twenty years, with the right of renewal. It was a substantial affair, and provision was AN EVENTFUL QUARREL 9 made for extensions. An inventory made after it had been a year and a half in operation shows that it then comprised four puddling-furnaces, four heating-furnaces, three boilers, one large steam-engine, four small engines, one steam-hammer, one trip-hammer, one tilt-hammer, one train of bar-rolls, one set of muck-rolls, one squeezer, three blacksmith's forges, four turning- lathes, one drilling-machine, one screw-cutting machine, one safe, shafting, pulleys and belting connected with the above machinery, sundry tools and merchandise, office furniture and fixtures. This list is dated April i6th, 1863. It tells the story of eighteen months of exceptional success, of progressive management, of the development of new lines of business, of earnings and profits put back into the business. Contrasted with the meagre resources of the little Duquesne shop, the Twenty-ninth Street mill, or the Iron City Forge as it was called, was a large and well-equipped establishment, with a large capacity for highly finished products worked up from the crudest forms. An idea of the great profits of a rolling-mill at this period may be obtained from the fact that between 1860 and 1864 the price of rolled bar-iron advanced from $58 to $146 a ton, while the cost of pig-iron rose only from $22 to $59. It will be noticed that, in the articles of partnership just quoted, the Miller-Phipps interest was again put in the name / of Henry Phipps, the original objection to Miller's open associa- tion with the firm being still thought valid; although it was a matter of remark by the Klomans that Miller, when making purchases for the Fort Wayne Road, drove a closer bargain with them than did any other of their customers. The condi- tion was nevertheless an unfortunate one ; and, as might have been expected, it presently gave rise to disagreements which ended in a quarrel and rupture. It is necessary to advert at some length to this quarrel be- cause it had an important bearing on the subsequent history of the enterprise. Indeed, it may be said to have completely io THE HUMBLE BEGINNING changed the current of events, giving them a shape contem- plated by none at the outset, and bringing in new influences which in the end dominated the firm and gave it a new name. In June, 1862, Miller went to England for a holiday. In- cidentally he made large purchases of railway supplies for his road, which were shipped in haste in order to evade the war-tax of thirty-five per cent, which had just been imposed on such things. On his return in November he was met by Andrew Kloman, who made a statement to him. This meeting and the events which followed were so important that Miller at the time wrote an account of them. In this statement he says : " When in Europe was written to by Phipps that my pres- ence would be a source of relief to them (Kloman & Co.). . . . On my return I was soon approached by Mr. Kloman, who stated that the business was growing too great for him, that his brother was getting careless in business, and that he could not sleep at nights owing to his many cares, and desired to know if I would take an active interest in the concern and buy his brother out. Mr. Phipps also joined in urging me to take active part and buy out Anthony Kloman. I desired that if I did so I might be privileged to stay with the P. Ft. W. and C. RR. until January, 1865, but Mr. K. was very anxious that I should take hold as soon as possible. So I accordingly com- menced negotiations with Anthony, assisted by Phipps and Kloman, and after considerable trouble induced him to sell at $20,000, which was then estimated to be more than interest conveyed was worth by two or three thousand dollars." This transaction was closed on April i6th, 1863; and en- dorsement of it was made on the original articles of partnership, November i6th, 1861, quoted above. This endorsement reads as follows : Having by articles of agreement taking effect the sixteenth day of April, 1863, bought the interest of Anton Kloman in the above firm of Kloman & Co. and paid for same in hand the sum of twenty thousand dollars (which sum covers other interests also), and having done this by the assistance in influence and by the desire and wish of the other two partners, and at a price PARTNERS AT ODDS n set by Andrew Kloman, I do this the thirteenth day of June, 1863, on the original papers handed to me by Henry Phipps, Jr., accept and assume the partnership of Anton Kloman to all in- tents and purposes, to the full and complete responsibility in- volved. Witness my hand and seal the day and year above written. THOMAS N. MILLER. Witness, J. H. MILLER. It appears, however, from Miller's written statement that before the actual transfer of Anthony's interest, Andrew Klo- man betrayed great uneasiness at the passing of control into the hands of his partners. To reassure him, Miller gave Andrew Kloman a bill of sale of half the interest just acquired NOTICE HE HE BY GIVEN THAT be t __ THOMAS N. MILLER is not a member of our firm, MB nor baa he any authority to transact business on cur, ' "account. 120 B KLOMAN fe CO. [Photographic Reproduction.] E? from Anthony ; and for a time Kloman seemed satisfied with this. Presently he realized that he still owned only half the stock of the company; and, to the surprise of Miller and the alarm of Phipps, he demanded that the latter sell out to him. Phipps naturally demurred to such summary ejection from a business which was daily becoming more valuable, and which he had helped to build up ; and he set himself to resist the pro- posal. Then Kloman turned to Miller and asked him to sell ; and presently all three were at odds. The situation was made worse when Kloman discovered that Phipps, at Miller's sugges- tion, had sold, some time before, a share of their first interest to William Cowley, who had enlisted in the war and had died of typhus fever contracted on the field of Fredericksburg. This 12 THE HUMBLE BEGINNING share was now offered for sale by the young soldier's brother, who was his executor. It was bought back by Miller for $8,500; but Kloman was naturally alarmed to learn that any part of the business which bore his name should be sold with- out his knowledge and in contravention of the articles of part- nership; and he became further incensed against Miller. The strain reached fracture-point when Miller, pending a satisfac- tory settlement, withheld, as agent of the Fort Wayne Road, certain payments due from it to the Kloman firm ; and Phipps, who had tried to remain neutral, was forced to take sides against his old friend Miller. It unfortunately happened about this time that a paragraph appeared in a local paper to the effect that Miller had bought an interest in the Kloman business, and that the style of the firm was to be changed to Kloman & Miller. It was probably one of those unauthorized statements which help to make up the local news of a paper; but it had the merit of truth. Nevertheless, by the advice of Ludwig Koethen, his lawyer, Kloman next day inserted an advertisement contradicting the statement. This appeared in the Pittsburg Evening Chronicle on Thursday, August 2Oth, 1863. This was the condition of affairs when the services of Andrew Carnegie were sought as peacemaker, with results that recall the ancient fable of the lawyer and the oyster. As the world knows, each of the litigants got a shell. Each of the litigants got a shell." CHAPTER II Carnegie's Birthplace. A MOST HAZARDOUS ENTERPRISE" ANDREW CARNEGIE was born in a little tile-roofed cottage in Moodie Street, Dunfermline, Scotland, on November 25th, 1835. His father was a weaver of fine damasks, taking the weft and warp from merchants and working them up on his own loom at home. The introduc- tion of steam-looms and the ex- tension of the factory system to the linen trade put Carnegie and other hand-weavers out of work; and in 1848 he migrated to America with his wife and two sons. Making their way to Pittsburg, where they had relatives, Carnegie found work in the old Blackstock cotton-mill on Robinson Street, Allegheny City ; and young Andy presently joined him there as bobbin boy at $1.20 a week. They lived in a little black frame house which stood in the rear of what is now 336 Rebecca Street, Allegheny a district then known as Slabtown and later as Barefoot Square. The mother eked out her husband's earnings by taking in washing; and her evenings were spent in binding boots for the father of Henry Phipps, who lived next door but one. A little later, when young Andy was fourteen, he got a position in the bobbin-turning shop of John H. Hayes, on Lacock Street, at $3 a week. His duties were to fire a furnace in the cellar with wooden chips and to assist in running a small engine. Later he was made bill clerk of the factory, and 13 14 "A MOST HAZARDOUS ENTERPRISE" left when he was fifteen to become a messenger boy for the Ohio Telegraph Company. Here he learned telegraphy, be- came an operator, and was taken in 1854, when he was nineteen years of age, into the service of Thomas A. Scott, then superintendent of the western division of the Pennsylvania Railway Company. A year later, in September, 1855, the father died. The house in Rebecca Street in which he lived had been purchased out of his savings ; and this he left to his wife, who afterward sold it for $1,500. During the next few years young Carnegie engaged in various outside enterprises, and through the aid of his chief, Mr. Scott, often made money in them. Indeed, during this fruitful period of his career, before he learned that " pioneering don't pay," he appears to have been ready to go into any scheme that was brought to his notice. Besides the Woodruff Sleeping Car Company and the Columbia Oil Company, in both of which Mr. Scott gave him an interest, and which are known to have been the basis of his fortune, he had interests in a scheme for building telegraph-lines along the Pennsylvania Railroad, in a construction company, in a project for establishing a sutler's business in soldiers' camps, in a horse-trading concern in con- nection with General Eagan for the supply of cavalry mounts to the Government, in a bridge-building company, in a locomo- tive works, in the Duck Creek Oil Company, in the Birming- ham Passenger [horse-car] Railroad, the Third National Bank, the Pittsburg Grain Elevator, the Citizens' Passenger Railroad, the Dutton Oil Company, and probably other ventures forgotten by himself and all who knew him. By 1863, the date of his entry into this story, when he was twenty-eight, he had made quite a little money, and had been promoted to Scott's position as local superintendent, with offices at the Outer Depot, Pitts- burg. His brother Tom, some nine years his junior, was his assistant. As boys, Andrew Carnegie and Thomas N. Miller had be- THE ORIGINAL SIX longed to a group which called itself The Original Six. This also included William Cowley, who has been mentioned, James R. Wilson, who reappears later, James Smith, and John Phipps. The last-named was Henry Phipps' brother, who died in youth. The Original Six took walks in the country together, met at /each other's homes, and some of them belonged to a singing- class conducted by Ludwig Koethen, the lawyer, choir-master, and assistant pastor of the Swedenborgian Church, of which all the Carnegies were members. Henry Phipps, being four years younger, belonged to another group, which included Tom Carnegie, Henry W. Oliver, and Robert Pitcairn. Andy, as he was generally called, was looked up to by the rest of the boys because he was older than any ex- cept Miller, who was three months his senior, and because of an as- sertiveness in his man- ner which the boys interpreted as evidence of fitness for leadership. It was therefore not unnatural that both Miller . and his young friend Phipps should submit to him their difficulties with Kloman. Miller, in particular, left his inter- ests in the hands of Carnegie, whom he held as his dearest friend. They had been the previous year in Europe together, where Miller had tended him in a long and dangerous illness. He had also tried to induce Kloman to admit Carnegie into their partnership ; but Kloman would not hear of it. So that in many ways Carnegie's selection as peacemaker was appro- priate. It was in this strange guise that Dame Fortune, having already gently tapped several times at Carnegie's door, now Some of them belonged to a Singing-Class." i6 'A MOST HAZARDOUS ENTERPRISE began a regular tattoo ; but so busy was he with his little schemes that many years passed before he realized the meaning of the noise. Carnegie's efforts in the interests of harmony produced nothing but fresh discord, until at length he decided upon the ANDREW CARNEGIE. GEORGE LAUDER. Taken in Glasgow. 1862. THOMAS N. MILLER. 1 elimination of the chief cause of trouble by ousting Miller him- self. This was not his avowed intention; but it was the result of his" method of restoring peace. A new partnership agree- \ ment was drawn up, dated September 1st, 1863, in which THE FIRST " EJECTURE" 17 Miller, in lieu of four-ninths, was given one-sixth, and made a special partner. The capital of the company, now known as Kloman & Phipps, was to be $60,000, and was to run for six years and four months ; but there was a clause reading : " But if at any time during the term aforesaid the said Kloman and Phipps shall desire to terminate the same as to the said special partner, then upon the said Kloman and Phipps giving to the said Thomas N. Miller sixty days' notice in writ- ing, and jointly signed, of their desire to that effect, the interest of him, the said Thomas N. Miller, shall at the end of said sixty days, and upon the payment to him of the capital invested by him and share of profits coming to him, or, in case of loss, of the total amount of capital still remaining due to him, retire from said firm, and his interest therein shall at that time wholly cease, and the same shall in such case accrue to the said Henry Phipps, Jr., as having a pre-emption right thereto, upon his paying in the capital for the purchase thereof. " This agreement was signed by all the parties, Miller adding to his signature a protest "against the sixty days." In the course of a few months fresh disputes occurred, and Miller was served with the sixty days' notice of expulsion. Upon this Andrew Carnegie and his brother Thomas M. Carnegie both drew up written and signed statements of their connection with the quarrel ; and in these appears for the first time the fact that Tom Carnegie had been admitted into the partnership with money which his brother had furnished, and that, in addition, to quote from Andrew's statement : " In the event of Miller's ejecture one-half of this interest would fall to my brother." This was the way in which the Carnegies first went into the iron business. In regard to the merits of the dispute itself, it is impossible after this lapse of time to unravel the tangled evidence. The suspicions and vacillation of Kloman seem to have contributed more than anything else to the quarrel. First he wished to be rid of his brother. Succeeding in this, he became desirous of sacrificing Phipps in order to regain the lost balance of power. i8 "A MOST HAZARDOUS ENTERPRISE" Finally, he preferred to force out Miller, probably realizing that his greater financial strength made Miller more dangerous than Phipps, who, beyond his small salary, had nothing but his interest in this firm. The elder Carnegie says in his statement that Kloman was alarmed lest Miller and Phipps should have a controlling interest. " A violent quarrel ensued, and the par- ties were embittered toward one another. Finding Miller ob- stinate and determined Mr. Klowman eventually thought Phipps would be more desirable as a member of the firm; and they be- came friendly disposed as the breach widened between Miller and Klowman. For some weeks," adds Carne- gie, " scarcely a day passed that I did not see one or more of the parties. Hear- ing both sides, I was fully satisfied I could not estab- lish harmony upon the basis of a common partnership. I finally got all "three to- gether in my office and pro- posed that Miller should have his one-third interest and be a silent (not special) member, Phipps and Klowman transacting the business. This was agreed to; but unfortu- nately ill feeling was created about a trifle, the result aimed at was lost, and the conference separated under angrier feelings than ever. Time only served to increase the violence of the quarrel." After making reference to Miller's having stopped the Fort Wayne payments, Carnegie continues : " But I con- sidered it so essential to Miller's standing that the notice THOMAS N. MILLER. First partner of Kloman and Phipps, and with them the founder of what afterwards became the Carnegie Steel Company. THE RUDIMENTARY "IRON-CLAD" 19 [i.e., the advertisement denying his partnership] be recalled, as enemies were not wantin-g who began circulating slanderous reports about his clandestine arrangement with Klowman while acting as agent of the Fort Wayne Road, that I insisted upon Miller agreeing to anything that would reinstate him in the eyes of the public as a legitimate member of the Klowman concern." This was the weakness of Miller's position ; but it need not have been fatal to it, since he had bought Anthony Kloman's interest openly and in his own name. It is, indeed, impossible to resist the thought that Andrew Carnegie compromised his friend by giving serious attention to the puerile objections of Kloman. Some of these, as quoted by Carnegie himself, are so childish that one is astonished at their influence on Carnegie. Kloman "told me," he writes, that he "found such a [special] partner might possibly create trouble by insisting upon coming into the mill, sitting in the office, talking to the men, etc., but more especially he was afraid Miller might involve the firm in some way, or attempt to do so, for revenge, or might insist upon withdrawing his share of the profits at inconvenient times, etc. To cover these objections I suggested that Miller's good behavior might be secured by a clause giving the other part- ners the right to eject him upon notice, provided the fears expressed were realized. This was accepted and the present papers executed. " Having reached this extraordinary settlement with Kloman, Carnegie telegraphed his brother to write Miller that he must accept it, as otherwise " the position in which I [Andrew Car- negie] would be placed would be that of an agent whose acts were disavowed by his principal, and this would be the first time during my life in which I had been so placed." Miller therefore accepted the settlement under protest, and allowed his interest to be cut down to what it was before the purchase of Anthony's stock, and to hold even this interest only on sufferance of his partners, H \ J S 1 J c MILLER'S CABBAGE PATCH 21 The incident closed for the time being, after Miller had accepted his expulsion and allowed his capital to be put in the name of T. M. Carnegie as trustee. Thenceforward it was a \ partnership between Kloman, Phipps, and the younger Carnegie. Even before the narratives of this quarrel were written August 5th, 1864 Miller had quietly paid $400 to a gardener named Cumming, as compensation for five acres of half-grown cabbages which he destroyed to make room for a rival mill at Thirty-third Street, Pittsburg, only four blocks from the Klo- man- Phipps Iron City Forges. The lease bears date of July 1st, 1864. In this venture Andrew Carnegie, despite his ] brother's interest in the Kloman mill, had a large share. The i list of organizers also included the names of Aaron G. ShifHer / and J. L. Piper, who had bridge-building works near, which . were to be supplied with iron from the new mill. There were also the names of John C. Matthews and Thomas Pyeatte on ' the association papers when these were published on October 1 4th, 1864. Pyeatte was the bookkeeper of the concern, and Matthews was manager. The Cyclops Iron Company was the ' name given to the new organization ; and the mill was designed to be the best in Pittsburg. None of the men, however, except Matthews, had had any practical experience; and Matthews was handicapped by the ambitious plans of his associates, who, he used to complain, "wanted him to build a $400,000 mill on a $100,000 capital. " The principal construction was 230 feet long and 80 feet wide. The building and equipment of the works occupied all winter; and when, in the spring, the ma- chinery was started, the structure was found too weak for its safe operation. Tom Carnegie had watched with grave concern his brother's connection with this enterprise ; and when his forebodings of disaster seemed about to be realized he urged Andrew to seek a union with the Kloman firm, so as to have the benefit of the German's mechanical experience and skill in remodelling the Cyclops Mill. Andrew, as was his wont when facing trouble, CARNEGIE REPROACHES HIS LUCK 23 laughed at his brother's anxiety, but decided to follow his ad- vice. Overcoming Miller's objection to an alliance with his recent opponents, Carnegie authorized his brother to open nego- tiations with Kloman and Phipps for a consolidation of interests. In the meantime the Twenty-ninth Street mill had been successful beyond all expectation ; and at the beginning of 1865 its capital was raised, to keep pace with its earning power, from $60,000 to $150,000. The proposal for union with the discredited Cyclops concern was naturally received by Kloman and Phipps with coldness ; but Tom Carnegie had a persuasive manner, and he made liberal offers. Finally it was agreed that Andrew Carnegie and his group should turn over the Cyclops Mill and a lump sum of $50,000, to be divided among the Kloman partners, in return for a little less than half of the shares of a new company, of which Andrew Kloman was to be manager. This was done; and on May ist, 1865, the Union Iron Mills Company was organized with a capital of half a million dollars. Thenceforward the two mills were known as the Upper and Lower Union Mills, and are so known to-day. Andrew Carnegie's disappointment at the outcome of this venture was carefully concealed at the time ; but he gave expres- sion to it a couple of years later in a letter full of reproaches which he sent to Miller. " I knew you had previously been wronged," he wrote, " and felt you could not forget it. I did what I could at the time to redress the wrong and went into the most hazardous enterprise I ever expect to have any connection with again, the building of a rival mill." And so, regarding it as a "most hazardous enterprise," Andrew Carnegie found himself fortuitously and complainingly thrust upon a road which was to lead him to a fortune of $250,000,000. The Cyclops Mill was built on five acres of land leased from the Denny estate, which paid $5,000 to recover the leases held by the market-gardener whose cabbages Miller dug up to make room for his foundations. The annual rental was $2,000 for twenty-one years, with a right of renewal for a similar term at 24 "A MOST HAZARDOUS ENTERPRISE" the rate which should be found current in the neighborhood. In 1884 the Dennys ascertained that rentals of adjoining prop- erty had increased fifteen-fold in twenty years. So they de- manded $25,000 a year for the old-time cabbage-patch, but finally accepted $12,000. Additions have been made from time to time to the original five-acre tract by purchase and by filling in the river front, until the Upper Union Mills now cover eight acres. PITTSBURG. The Allegheny River on the reader's left, the Monongahela on the right. They form the Ohio at their junction. The first Kloman forge was at the (left) end of the furthest bridge up the Allegheny, seen in the above illustration. The second Kloman forge was almost opposite, on the Pittsburg side of the river. Plate HENRY PHIPPS, ANDREW CARNEGIE AND JOHN VANDEVORT TAKEN IN 1865 DURING A WALKING TOUR IN ENGLAND CHAPTER III EARLY STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES THE war of the rebellion was draw- ing to a close when the consolida- tion of the two mills took place. r At once the demand tor govern-' ment supplies ceased; and it be- came necessary not only to find new markets, but to make other kinds of goods than the Kloman mill had been producing. This was no easy matter ; and the difficulty was increased by the need for finding an outlet for the products of the new mill. Mr. Phipps says that business runs wonderfully easily when it gets in a groove. But in the beginning there are no grooves; and the paths of trade for the Union Iron Mills had to be created. With the carelessness of youth Phipps gave little thought to the making of trade-grooves for the new company ; but hav- ing just received his first large sum of money, he thought the time had come for a great and glorious holiday. Andrew Carnegie shared the idea; and, accompanied by John Vande- vort, they went to Europe on a nine months' walking tour, leaving Kloman in charge of the Lower Mill, with Matthews, under his supervision, to manage the Upper Mill. Tom Car- negie was to help in such ways as he could. Miller, who was now the largest individual owner, took no active part in the direction of affairs; but he occasionally made the firm an advance of ready money. For it soon became evident to these young men, venturing in untried fields and with conditions of trade undergoing a sudden and radical change, that the finan- 25 26 EARLY STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES cing of their operations was going to be difficult. Recalling this time, Miller long afterward used to express his wonder, not only at their audacity, but at their luck. " It is no credit to any of us that we did not 'bust ' twenty times," he used to say. As the weeks grew into months the ever-increasing financial x pressure developed in Tom Carnegie a resourcefulness which he himself had never suspected, and was a constant surprise to those who had known him only as his brother's assistant. He had a win- ning personality, and made friends even when asking a favor. His nature was broadly human ; and he found a point of sympathetic contact in everybody he touched. The conviviality which his more austere brother afterwards so* freely condemned had a positive monetary value during these trying times, when the tour- ists in Europe were discuss- ing cathedral architecture and falling into bewildered rapture over the beauties of the blossoming heather. If the situation was saved for the Union Iron Mills Company, it was due to Kloman's mechanical genius and Tom Carnegie's ability to make friends and then promptly to convert them into cash. Despite all this, it is doubtful if the firm had survived the return of the holiday-makers had it not been for the lucky - speculation in oil which Miller had made in 1862, the returns from which enabled him repeatedly to come to the company's rescue. " A friend in need is a friend indeed," Tom would say 'Discussing cathedral architecture.' COSTLY BLUNDERS 27 to Miller by way of preface when asking for a couple of thou- sands to meet the wage-roll on Saturdays. Then Kloman had his troubles. The new mill was even more faulty in construction than he had supposed ; and large sums were needed for alterations. Mr. Phipps says it had almost to be rebuilt. Andrew Carnegie, in his reproachful let- ter to Miller, says : "We had to spend at least $30,000 on the * Upper'Mills to remedy blunders. " Rarely, indeed, has a great enterprise been started under such hopeless conditions; and had it been known how hopeless they were, it is likely that the partners would have given up the struggle in despair and gone back to their bookkeeping and their telegraph instruments. Presently the tide turned. The railroads throughout the South were being rebuilt, the West was opening up, the Union Pacific was under way, and a general revival of the iron trade took place. Tom Carnegie had the benefit of the ripe experi- ence and solid judgment of William Coleman, a pioneer in the . Pittsburg iron business, whose daughter he was hoping to wed. Under Mr. Coleman's direction the energies of the firm were directed into the channels which Kloman had partially known before the .war; and the boom in railroad-building came in time to save the Union Mills. In addition, a new outlet for their product was opened through the connection which Andrew Carnegie had formed with the bridge-building firm of Piper & Shiffler, afterwards known as the Keystone Bridge Company. This concern now bought all its shapes and most of its struct- ural material from the Union Iron Mills ; and soon the altera- tions which Kloman made in the Upper Mills enabled him to roll beams large enough for bridge purposes. In the spring of 1866 Phipps and the elder Carnegie re- turned from their European trip ; and the former at once assumed financial management of the company, thereby taking upon him- self a burden which never left him for twenty years. In these days of mammoth financial operations we are so accus- tomed to see tens and even hundreds of millions raised for this, 28 EARLY STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES that, or the other purpose, that it is difficult to conceive of the greatest constituent company of a billion-dollar organization having trouble to find money to pay the wages of its workmen. But Phipps had years of such experiences; and more than once the men were obliged to accept, in lieu of wages, orders for groceries on a local store. An amusing circumstance is recalled to illustrate the chronic nature of this effort to do business without adequate capital. Mr. Phipps had an old black mare, Gypsy, which he used to drive from one bank to another. This old horse made the rounds so often that it would stop of its own , accord whenever it came to a bank; and it would make a diagonal line across Wood Street from the Citizens' National to the First National, and then on to the Third Na- tional, stopping before each bank and quietly "A diagonal line across Wood Street." waiting until Mr. Phipps had arranged for the day's necessities. It was impossible to drive this old horse in a straight line on Wood Street. The president of one of the old Pittsburg banks recently said to the present writer concerning those times : " What we used to admire in young Phipps was the skilful way in which he could keep a check in the air for two or three days." For a while financial conditions became easier ; but before Mr. Phipps had grown accustomed to the change a fresh strin- gency arose through an unwise incursion into a new field. There was a pipe-works adjoining the Lower Mill, and some one suggested to Andrew Carnegie that it would be a good thing to buy this property; it would round out their holdings, besides providing them with a new market for their iron. The - CARNEGIE'S OFFER TO SELL OUT 2 Q plan commended itself to the elder Carnegie, who was always on the alert for new uses for the product of the mill; but Tom, who often served as a balance-wheel to his brother's over-san- guine temperament, and who, moreover, had had some personal experience of the difficulty of financing a growing business with a stationary capital, strongly opposed it, and showed that the sort of iron used in the pipe-works was not the kind the Union Mills produced. His opposition was nevertheless over- ruled. "Tom was born tired," Andy used to say in excuse of what he considered his brother's lack of enterprise. So the pipe-works were acquired at a cost of $36,000; and soon af- terwards they were burned down while only partially insured. The loss in cash amounted to $25,000; but Mr. Phipps used to say that this was offset by the advantage of being rid of a white elephant, and by the comfort of $i 1,000 insurance money in the till. Despite the prosperous condition of the iron trade at this time the difference between pig-iron and rolled bars was still about $50 a ton the loss on the pipe-works, joined to that resulting from the faulty construction of the Upper Mill, gave a very discouraging aspect to the balance-sheet of the company. Indeed, the scanty profits of the first three years hardly redeemed the enterprise from failure. While there was no actual deficit there was practically no profit none at all, in fact, if due allow- ance be made for depreciation of the plant ; and Andrew Car- negie expressed a desire to get out of the business at any price. Writing to Miller on September 4th, 1867, he says: " I want to get out of them [the Union Iron Mills], and will do so before long. Even if I can't sell my stock it can go." And he adds that " $27.40 per share will be very gladly received." As he then held 1,600 shares, he would thus have received $43,840 for his entire interest. It is proper to state that the letter from which this quota- tion is made was part of an effort to get Miller to sell out of the Union Iron Mills Company. In the fall of 1867 the old 30 EARLY STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES quarrel had broken out afresh. Indeed, Miller, from the date of the consolidation, had consistently refused to sit on the board of directors with his former opponents; and against Phipps in particular he cherished grievances that hampered the harmonious working of the new organization. And now, to make matters worse, a dispute occurred between him and the elder Carnegie, concerning some shares in the Columbia Oil Company which the latter had sold him " at cost," but which Miller had reason to believe had yielded Carnegie a profit of over three hundred per cent. The actual facts of this trans- action have never been ascertained; but in 1896, when Miller officially came into possession of the old books of the Columbia Oil Company, he found on the minutes the original record of Andrew Carnegie's purchase of some treasury stock at $2 a share, and a protest of other shareholders against it. As Miller paid Carnegie $6.37^ a share for similar stock probably not the same he felt that he had been justified in his criticisms of Carnegie. He later sold this stock, which had cost him $637.50, for $72,000, after receiving many large dividends which enabled him to make the loans to Tom Carnegie for the Union Iron Mills Company. Naturally this double dispute made Miller's position in the company untenable ; and he set out to find some one to buy him out. Carnegie offered to help him ; and the letters he then wrote show the poor regard in which he held the enterprise. In one he states that on his return from Europe he had " found the Union Iron Mills, in my opinion, going as fast as they could into bankruptcy " ; and he estimates (1867) " the mills as worth (or as costing exclusive of the large sums paid to repair defect- ive mill) $300,000. When we pay off $37,602.29 of debt," adds Carnegie, "they will be worth that." A month later he writes : " Profits are not quite $30,000 " after running two years and five months. " Our whole thing to-day could be re- placed for $250,000, and we still owe a good deal upon it. I could not recommend the purchaser to pay more than $27.50 for FOREIGN WORKMEN IMPORTED it per share. I would like to get rid of my own at that figure." The purchaser here referred to was supposed by Miller to be David A. Stewart ; but when the sale was finally made the buyer proved to be Andrew Carnegie himself. The price paid was $32 a share for 2,300 shares. These included the holdings of Matthews which Miller had previously bought. In this way Andrew Carnegie increased his holdings to thirty-nine .per cent of the total number of outstanding shares. The lack of harmony in the council-chambers of the Union Iron Mills was reflected at the works ; for about this time a strike occurred among the puddlers. In an unex- pected, and even a roman- tic, way this strike brought about changes that, in the end, benefited the firm to the extent of millions of dollars, and did much to put it in the van of pro- gressive iron-workers. At this date the Am- algamated Union did not exist ; but there were sep- arate trade associations for each class of labor. The puddlers were strongly or- ganized under the title of the Sons of Vulcan. By reason of falling prices a demand had been made on the puddlers in the Pittsburg district to accept a reduction of wages. This being refused, a lockout resulted; and the firm had its first fight with labor. It was not a very serious 'A large number of foreigners were brought over." 32 EARLY STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES one, for sympathetic strikes were then unknown ; and the rest of the men in the mills continued to work as long as the material on hand lasted or fresh supplies could be had. During the summer of 1867 the manufacturers affected by the strike raised a fund and sent to Europe for workmen to take the places of the refractory puddlers. There being no contract labor law to prevent it, a large number of foreigners were engaged and brought over. They were of all kinds and many nationalities. Some Germans who could not speak Eng- lish were allotted to the Union Iron Mills because Andrew Kloman, being a German himself, could easily control and direct them. It is interesting to note that it was not these drastic measures that broke the strike; for the increasing boom in the iron trade soon absorbed the labor of all, at wages even higher than before. Among the Germans sent to Kloman was one named John Zimmer, a bright, capable fellow, who knew not only his own * business but that of the next man. After he had been a little time in the works, he described to Mr. Kloman a mill that he had worked on in Germany, on which it was possible to roll plates of various widths having well-finished rolled edges. Such plates were unknown in America. The mill described by , Zimmer consisted of a pair of horizontal rolls similar to the ordinary plate-mill then in use, but having in addition two movable vertical rolls that could be opened or closed at the will of the operator. Mr. Kloman was at once struck with the value of the improvement, especially for rolling material for bridge orders; and with Zimmer 's aid he erected the first Ger- man mill in the country. This is the machine now known in the trade as the Universal Mill. It was capable of rolling plates from seven to twenty-four inches wide, and from tjiree-six- teenths to two inches in thickness, with rolled edges. From the first day this mill was a mechanical success, and was the forerunner of several improved mills of the same character afterwards erected at the Upper Mill and at Homestead. In' 33 deed, the great slabbing-mill which was erected at Homestead in 1888 was a lineal descendant of the little Zimmer mill built in 1867-68 at Kloman's. This slabbing-mill now turns out thirty thousand tons of steel slabs a month; and, as it has steadily increased its production from year to year, it seems probable that its limit has not been reached even yet. Before its erection the average weight of an ingot that could be used to make plates direct was about one ton ; whereas ten- and fifteen-ton ingots are now rolled down to a thickness of four to six inches, then cut while red-hot into the lengths needed at the plate-mill. This little idea of the German workman has been worth millions of dollars to the firm that imported him to take the place of a striker. As for Zimmer himself, his reward was a well-paid position as foreman of the mill he erected and of its improved successors. He accumulated a competence, and was believed to be possessed of upwards of one hundred thousand dollars before he died. Despite the vaunted progressiveness of the American manu- facturer, these machines, open to the inspection of anybody who passed through the Union Mills, were but slowly adopted by other firms. Even Andrew Carnegie, after twenty years' experi- ence of the excellencies of the German mill, in consonance with his dictum, " Pioneering don't pay," opposed the erection of the slabbing-mill at Homestead ; although he afterwards be- came an enthusiastic admirer of its work. The Carnegie works to-day have still the most perfect-running Universal mills in the country ; and there is not another slabbing-mill in the world to compare in power, size, and efficiency with that at Home- stead. Within five miles of Homestead, one of the largest plate-mills in the country is producing, from the ingots which it necessarily uses, not more than one-third the product of a similar mill at Homestead, which works up the slabs made on the giant descendant of the little Zimmer mill. In the larger sphere now open to it Kloman's inventive 3 34 EARLV STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES genius found free scope. Even in the early days of the Lower Mill he perfected many devices that resulted in improved output and increased economies. Here he invented a machine for "upsetting" the ends of eye-bars, which had previously been made by forging and welding. At the Upper works he put in a twenty-inch beam-mill, the first ever built in Pittsburg that was planed and fitted complete, the rough casting style having been the rule ; and on this were rolled the first beams made in Pittsburg. He also erected the first Siemens re- generative gas-heating furnace in Pittsburg. He invented a machine for straightening and bending beams, channels, etc., cold; and the disc-saw for cutting beams, etc., cold, was first introduced by him. In designing rolls for unusual shapes he showed a rare capacity. Indeed, his ingenuity in this line of work was unequalled by any master mechanic in the country, and made his connection with the Union Mills valuable beyond compute. Naturally he won the admiration of the men under him, who were well qualified to recognize his powers ; and his associates reposed entire confidence in his ability, gave him a free hand in the works, and cordially sustained him in his pro- gressive methods. As financial director of the Union Iron Mills Company Mr. Phipps did not limit his duties to supervising accounts, bank- ing transactions, and the mere routine work of the office. He went into the mill and watched the men at work, studied the machinery, and familiarized himself with all the details of manu- facture. Then he wandered into other works, and, comparing methods and results, suggested improvements and economies in his own. The spirit of enterprise that sanctioned the Zimmer experiment led him to institute scientific tests of structural material ; and he was one of the first in his line of business to call in the aid of the chemist. He was ever seeking to get the cost-line of mill productions to the lowest point consistent with the quality required by the structural engineer. To his ; never-ceasing watchfulness are largely due the great economies MR. P HIP PS' INGENUITY 35 in production which placed his firm always beyond the reach of competition. On one of his trips abroad Mr. Phipps was passing through a mill in Germany when he noticed that the piles made ready for the heating-furnace, to be used for rolling " I " beams, con- tained more than double the amount of scrap-iron rails used in ^ittsburg. He quietly made a sketch of the pile, and on his re- turn gave orders to change the piles at the Union Iron Mills to correspond with his sketch. He then had the resultant product tested, and, finding that the economy still left the factor of safety unimpaired, made the change permanent. The cost of this trip to Europe was saved almost daily thereafter to his firm. Another great economy was effected by Mr. Phipps in 1872- 1873. In the quiet, unobtrusive manner in which he habitually worked, he made a long series of observations at the two mills and then did a little careful figuring. After cautiously verify- ing his conclusions, he announced to his partners that at a cost of one-third the price for which he believed he could sell the Lower Mill, he could enlarge the Upper Mill so as to make its product equal to that of both. The saving in cost of manage- ment and in the handling of material he reckoned would exceed $25,000 a year, a sum equal to five per cent, on their capital. His partners, who had learned to trust his instinct for economies, offered no objection to the plan except the difficulty of finding a purchaser for the Lower Mill. This difficulty Mr. Phipps solved with his habitual originality : he got up a company to buy it ! At the same time he brought in a new influence which eventually became of great value to the concern. This was his brother-in-law, Mr. John Walker. At this time Mr. Walker was entirely without experience in the iron trade ; but he had had a good commercial training under his father. Endowed with an extraordinary memory, he quickly mastered the details of his new business, and in the course of time he became a compendium of facts and dates, tq _, a; a S ENTRY OF JOHN WALKER 37 whom his colleagues referred for information of all kinds bear- ing on their business. Cautious in his undertakings and con- servative in his methods, he had the confidence of the local bankers; and his financial connections were invaluable to his firm and to Carnegie, Phipps & Co. when he afterwards became chairman of that concern. Of studious habits and logical cast of mind, he showed his independence and intellectual honesty by openly combatting the protectionist theory ac a time when this was held by his associates as the rankest treason. The same frank spirit was shown in all the relations of his business life ; and he had, in an exceptional degree, the confidence and even affection of his partners and others with whom he was associated. With Mr. Walker as a consenting nucleus, Mr. Phipps pro- ceeded with the creation of a company to buy the Lower Union Mill. The firm of Berry, Courtney & Wilson, which had been a large purchaser of iron from Mr. Phipps' company, was on the eve of dissolution ; and no difficulty was found in persuading its most active member, Mr. John T. Wilson, to join Mr. Walker. The firm of Wilson, Walker & Co. was thus formed ; and at once it bought the business and patents of Berry, Courtney & Wilson for $50,000. Half of this sum coming to Mr. Wilson, he put his $25,000 into the new company. Andrew Carnegie added $60,000 as a silent member of the firm; and the rest of the $200,000 capital was subscribed by John Walker, Alexander Leggate, and Howard Morton. The two last named soon with- drew from the firm. The old Kloman Iron City Forge, with its little Zimmer mill, the four puddling-furnaces, now increased to fifteen, its six heating-furnaces, four hammers, and five trains of rolls, was now turned over to Wilson, Walker & Co., and the Union Iron Mills Company concentrated itself upon the Upper Union Mills. As makers of bar-iron, railroad-car forgings and plates, the firm of Wilson, Walker & Co. ran as an independent concern until 1886, when it once more became part of the Phipps organization by inclusion in the firm of Carnegie, 38 EARLY STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES Phipps & Co., Limited, at a valuation of $340,000 above $87,000 mortgage. In regard to the Upper Mill, even greater economies than those foreseen by Mr. Phipps resulted from the change described. When the additions were made they were prudently designed for heavy work ; and soon the company was rolling all sizes of beams up to fifteen inches for structural purposes, all kinds of channels up to fifteen inches, almost innumerable sizes of angles, tees, Z bars, and other structural shapes, and universal plates on two large and improved Zimmer mills, of which the enterprising German was placed in charge. By 1881, when the Union Iron Mills were taken into the consolidation of various properties under the name of Carnegie Brothers & Co., Limited, the origi- nal long building had been surrounded by nine others, some almost equal to it in length. They contained one eight-inch train of rolls, one twelve-inch train, an eighteen- inch muck-train, an eighteen-inch scrap-train, a rotary squeezer, all operated by five large horizontal engines. There were, moreover, nine Siemens furnaces, one Swindell furnace, twenty-one puddling- furnaces, two reverberatory furnaces, besides extensive ma- chine-shops full of costly tools. The plant was taken into the consolidation at a valuation of $630,000. As the Lower Mill was sold to Wilson, Walker & Co. for $230,000, it thus appears that the plant had increased in value seventy-two per cent, in sixteen years. CHAPTER IV IRON RAILWAY BRIDGES THE Keystone Bridge Company, to which ref- erence has been made, was formed on April 25th, 1865, with a capital of $300,000. The list of organizers included the names of Aaron G. Shiffler, J. L. Piper, Andrew Carnegie, Walter Katte, and James Stewart. Its purpose, as stated in its prospectus, was " the prosecution on an extensive scale " of the business of man- ufacturing and erecting patent iron bridges " for railways, canals, common roads, streets, &c., &c. Also wire suspension bridges, ornamental bridges for parks and cities, pivot and draw bridges for roads, canals and railways, . . . built according to plans and specifications, as may be desired. " The company is said further to have " purchased the exten- sive Bridge Works of Messrs. Piper and Shiffler, located in the Ninth Ward of the City of Pittsburgh, Pa., with the right for the United States to manufacture and erect the celebrated Iron Railway Bridges under the 'Linville & Piper' Patents, and 'Piper's Patent' Wooden Bridges and Roof Frames." The works are described as having ample facilities " for the extensive contracts now in progress, and will be increased as rapidly as found expedient, in order to complete promptly the most extensive structures." " The ofBcers who superintend the manufacture and erection of all structures " are said to be " practical men, with extensive and varied experience, acquired in pursuing successfully, for many years, the business of constructing and erecting Iron and Wooden Railway Bridges, Roofs and Buildings. 39 40 IRON RAIL WA Y BRIDGES " These Iron Bridges have been in constant use on the Great Pennsylvania Central Rail Road and its dependencies and con- nections, for many years. The great Iron Railway Bridge over the Ohio River at Steubenville, Ohio, with spans varying from 210 feet to 320 feet was erected by this Bridge Company, in accordance with the prescribed plans and specifications "The success of the 'Linville & Piper ' Patent Bridges has been unprecedented ; for many years they have borne without visible defect or deterioration, the immense traffic of the Penn- sylvania Central Rail Road, Philadelphia and Erie Rail Road, Northern Central Railway, Junction Rail Road, and others. Miles of wooden bridge superstructure have been replaced by permanent iron structures, by the superintending officers of this Company, without detention to the business of the roads. No single instance of failure, either in materials or workmanship, has yet been reported." Mr. W. H. Wilson, chief engineer of the Pennsylvania Rail- road, writing from Altoona on July 2ist, 1865, says : " Messrs. J. L. Piper and A. G. Shiffler have been engaged for the last eight years under my personal observation, and for some years previously, in erecting bridges for the Pennsylvania Rail Road Company. The wooden bridges have generally been on the 'Howe ' plan; the iron bridges have been constructed in the shops of the Company, from plans prepared by the Engi- neer Department, some of them of boiler plate, but most of them on the ' Pratt' plan of truss, with modifications intro- duced at various times. All the work of raising and completing these bridges has been performed by Messrs. Piper and Shiffler in the most satisfactory manner. It affords me pleasure to recommend them as unsurpassed for promptness, energy and skill by any builders with whom I have had business relations." It thus appears that Piper and Shiftier had been extensively engaged in building bridges of wood and iron for at least eight years prior to the formation of the Keystone Bridge Company. Andrew Carnegie, however, in his account of the business, speaks as though it originated with the Keystone Bridge Com- 42 IRON RAILWAY BRIDGES pany, which he represents as his personal creation. In a short biography which he recently published through the S. S. McClure Newspaper Syndicate, he says : " There were so many delays on railroads in those days from burned or broken wooden bridges that I felt the day of wooden bridges must end soon, just as the day of wood-burning locomo- tives was ended. Cast iron bridges, I thought, ought to replace them, so I organized a company, principally from railroad men I knew to make these iron bridges, and we called it the Key- stone Bridge Company. Development of this company required my time, so I resigned from the railroad service in 1867." Mr. Carnegie has an excellent verbal memory; but he is especially prone to error when recalling events. He is, in fact, constantly mistaking impressions for occurrences, as in this case. That it is his memory which is here at fault is shown by a further error in the same biography. Speaking of his entry upon the manufacture of Bessemer steel he says : " On my return from England [he is speaking of the year 1868] I built at Pittsburg a plant for the Bessemer process of steel-making, which had not until then been operated in this country, and started in to make steel rails for American railroads." First noting that the construction of the first Carnegie Bes- semer steel plant was not commenced until April, 1873, and was not in operation until the end of August, 1875, it may be seen by reference to any cyclopedia that the first Bessemer steel pro- duced in America was made at Wyandotte, Michigan, in 1864, and that the first Bessemer steel rails made in America were rolled at the North Chicago Rolling Mill in presence of the American Iron and Steel Institute in May, 1865, from ingots made at Wyandotte. Some of these rails were laid in the track of one of the railroads running out of Chicago ; and were still in use ten years afterwards when the Carnegie firm made its first Bessemer steel. Even if Mr. Carnegie's recollection had been correct as to the date of this visit to England, it would still be at fault in respect to the beginnings of Bessemer steel PIPER'S MECHANICAL GENIUS 43 rails in America; for there were produced no less than 7,225 tons of such rails in America in 1 868. The prosaic fact is that the earliest of the Carnegie steel enterprises was the eleventh in America instead of the first to use the Bessemer process. In themselves these discrepancies are of little moment. It is probable that not one reader in a hundred would notice them ; but the author deems it his duty to the exceptional reader to set forth the facts as he finds them.* The Keystone Bridge Company, then, was simply the incor- porated business of Messrs. Piper and ShifBer. Carnegie, / through his official position on the railroad, had long been familiar with their work; and he had known Piper since 1858, when the latter was employed for a time in the car shops at Altoona, where Carnegie then lived. Piper was a mechanical genius who was always inventing * The author has taken such pains, by reference to original documents, to t establish the dates of every salient event in the history of the Carnegie Steel Company, that he ventures, even at the risk of being thought unduly insistent, to point out a further error of fact into which Mr. Carnegie has fallen through over- confidence in his memory. In itself the matter is trivial ; but it may have a value in the determination of other questions of fact which may arise. In the same biography Mr. Carnegie says: " For my father, who had been naturalized as an American citizen in 1853, na d died soon afterwards. ... At the age of sixteen I was the family mainstay." The facts, as shown by the Allegheny county records on file in the Pittsburg Court House, are as follows: On September I4th, 1855, the father of Andrew Carnegie made a will, bequeathing a house and lot in Allegheny City to Margaret Carnegie, his wife. Andrew was then within ten weeks of being twenty years of age. This will was recorded on March 3Oth, 1858, when Andrew w r as in his twenty-third year. As regards "the family mainstay," the facts are as follows: During the first of young Andy's working years, his wages were $1.20 a week, or $62.40 for the year. At Lacock's he got $3 a week, or $156 for the year. Next he earned $3-5. r $182 a year. Thus, at sixteen , years of age, his total earnings had amounted to about $400, or one- quarter as much as his father had invested in the little home at the time of his death. But the elder Carnegie did not die until Andrew had almost reached his twenty-first birthday ; and he worked until within a few weeks of his death. In the year of his father's death Andrew Carnegie's salary was $35 a month ; but he lived away from home and had hardly more than sufficed for his own necessities. Even after this his mother kept a railway lodging-house near Twenty-Eighth Street, Pittsburg, where Robert Pitcairn, his successor on the Pennsylvania Railroad, was one of her lodgers. 44 IRON RAILWAY BRIDGES things. One of his patents, still remembered by his associates of that day, was a turn-table for locomotives ; and he afterwards embodied some of the ideas it contained in a drawbridge. He also devised an improved bridge-post which was extensively used; and there were other things invented in conjunction with Linville, who was bridge engineer for the Pennsylvania Railroad, and later became president of the Keystone Bridge Company. He was a man of impressive appearance, a physical giant, and earnest and convincing in manner. At the same time he was of singular trustfulness. One of the stories still current of Tom Carnegie's ready wit bears on this trait of Piper's. The Keystone Bridge Company enjoyed certain rebates or discounts from the card rates of the Union Iron Mills Com- pany, from which it bought most of its material. One time when the price of iron had risen, the discounts were omitted from the bill rendered to the Keystone Company, and the word " net " appeared in their place. " What does that mean, Tom ? " asked Piper as he indicated the word " net." Piper, like most simple characters, loved a bargain; and Tom, knowing this, hesitated to mention the withdrawal of discounts. So he an- swered with his characteristic readiness, " Oh that ? That's 'nit. ' It means that there's nothing to be added ! " The reply satisfied Piper, and he made no objection to the payment of the bill. Shiffler, the other founder of the business, had worked with Piper in a contractor's gang under the firm of Stone, Quigley & Co. on the Pennsylvania lines prior to 1857. This was the period referred to by Chief Engineer Wilson, when he said he had known them "for some years " prior to 1857 while "erecting bridges for the Pennsylvania Rail Road." Here they got the experience which made their firm so successful, and qualified them for the direction of the Keystone Bridge Company when that was formed. But neither of them origi- nated the use of iron in bridges ; for this material had been so used from the earliest days. 46 IRON RAIL WA Y BRIDGES The first iron bridge ever attempted was at Lyons, France, in 1/55. It was to have been an arch; but the work was aban- doned, after a portion of the iron had been made, because of its 4 great cost. In 1/77-79 the first iron bridge was built by Abra- ham Darby, over the Severn near Colebrookdale, in Shropshire, the place taking the name Ironbridge. Its form is that of an arch of i2O-foot span and 4 5 -foot rise. The next iron bridge was built at Wearmouth in Devonshire. It was in the form of a segmental arch of no less than 236-foot span; and it cost ,27,000. In Sunderland, also in England, a bridge was built in 1796, of large segments of cast iron. It was justly consid- ered a wonderful achievement. Affixed to it was the motto Nil despcmndum auspice Deo ; and Sir Lowthian Bell says that every traveller to the north of England considered himself bound to visit what then was regarded as a most daring example of me- tallic engineering. In France the iron foot-bridge across the Seine near the Louvre was built in 1803 ; and during the ensu- ing fifty years many other iron bridges were constructed in Europe. With these examples before them it is not surprising that x American engineers adopted iron for railroad bridges early in the history of steam transportation. As early as 1841 Squire Whipple, called the father of American iron railroad bridges, patented an iron truss-bridge ; though even he was not the first in the field. It is said that Tom Paine built an iron truss- bridge. Be this as it may, there were iron bridges spanning the Erie canal as early as 1840; and by 1847 a company the New York Iron Bridge Company had been formed for the ex- clusive manufacture of such structures. A bridge built by this company on the Harlem Railroad is described in the American Railroad Journal for November 27th, 1847; and an'iron Howe railroad bridge was already in existence on the North Adams branch of the Boston and Albany Railroad, a few miles north of Pittsfield, in April, 1847, where it was examined by Squire Whipple. In 1848 Whipple built two iron bridges on the Erie SOME EARLY EXAMPLES 47 Railroad; in 1849 he built two more near the Chester junction of the Newburgh branch of the Erie. In 1852-53 the first iron railroad bridge of considerable span, being 1 50 feet to centre of bearings, was erected on the Albany Northern Railroad at the crossing of the Erie canal between the cities of Troy and J. L. PIPER, Who, with Aaron G. Shiffler, founded the Keystone Bridge Works. Cohoes. It stood for thirty years, and was removed in good condition to make way for a double-track bridge. A bridge of the same description was built in 1854 for the Black River and Utica Railroad at Utica. In 1855 one was built for the same road at Boonville, Oneida County. During the decade between 1850 and 1860, which brings us to the time of Piper and 4 8 IRON RAIL WAV BRIDGES Shiffler, the firm of S. & J. M. Whipple alone built over a hun- dred iron bridges of all kinds and shapes. In 1863 the Detroit Iron Bridge Works was organized into a joint stock company; and its prospectus states that its manager had " for some years previous been engaged in the construction of iron bridges for railways. " Thus, so far from being the pioneer in the iron railroad bridge business, Mr. Carnegie occupied a position a long way down the list. When he finally did become interested with Piper and ShifBer it was not, as he alleges, in " cast-iron bridges." When cast iron was in vogue for bridge structures in England, wood was used in America; and when wood was replaced with iron it was wrought iron, and later Bessemer steel, that was used. The only parts of Piper & ShifBer's bridges that were of cast iron were Piper's patent posts ; and these were a very small part of the whole, which, of course, was of wrought iron. It is also worthy of mention that Andrew Carnegie's princi- pal interest in the Keystone Bridge Company was given to him in return for services rendered in its promotion. He paid no cash for any of his shares; but desiring to have a larger hold- ing than that gratuitously assigned to him, he gave his note to the company in payment of the increased interest, and the first four dividends sufficed to liquidate the debt. It is possible that the standards of commercial morality were as high forty years ago as they are to-day. Business men of that period aver that they were higher. It is none the less certain that the ethics of railroad management in early days were formed after other standards than those of modern times ; else had there been more general condemnation of the fault which Andrew Carnegie discovered in Miller's "clandestine arangement with Klowman while acting as agent of the Fort Wayne Road." Such arrangements, not always clandestine, seem to have been the rule in those days , and the early history of the Carnegie enterprises affords many examples. Despite EARLY RAILROAD MORALS 49 the fact that the principal business of the most important of these enterprises was the manufacture of rails, railway struct- ures, and railway material of various kinds, it was from the salaried officials of railways that much of their first financial support was received. Miller did not sever his connection with the Fort Wayne road when he built the Cyclops Mill ; nor did Andrew Carnegie resign from the Pennsylvania when he joined him. Indeed, it was not an uncommon thing for the president and vice-president of a railroad to own shares in a corporation which obtained most of its business from such road. No doubt the business was contracted for by faithful subordinates, and was honestly and properly carried out by the contracting com- panies; and while it is possible that no question of morals is involved in the dual allegiance of such important officials, mod- ern opinion would unhesitatingly condemn it as a breach of pro- priety and good taste. In the formation of the Keystone Bridge Company this in- fraction of modern standards was especially conspicuous; al- though the matter-of-fact way in which Mr. Carnegie speaks of organizing a company "principally from railroad men" shows that he, at least, had no idea that the propriety of such a pro- ceeding might be questioned. President J. Edgar Thomson, however, had his interest appear on the company's books in the name of his wife. Besides Colonel Scott, vice-president, the Pennsylvania Railroad officials who became stockholders in the Keystone Bridge Company included the chief engineer, the assistant general superintendent, the superintendent of motive power and machinery, and Andrew Carnegie, the superintend- ent of the Pittsburg division of the line. There were also the president of another road, two chief engineers, and a general superintendent. Carnegie says he did not resign his position on the Pennsylvania Railroad until 1867, two years after the formation of the Keystone Bridge Company ; * and Mr. Pitcairn, * Another error. He left the Penr sylvania Railroad in 1865, in his thirtieth year. 4 5 o IRON RAIL WA Y BRIDGES his successor on the railway, afterwards joined the Keystone board of directors. It is deserving of notice that most of these gentlemen wrote letters of recommendation to the Keystone Bridge Company, in which the work of Piper and Shiffler was spoken of in the most flattering terms ; and these were published by the company as an advertisement. Here for example are those from Mr. J. Edgar Thomson and Colonel Scott : PENNSYLVANIA RAIL ROAD COMPANY President's Office Philadelphia, Sept. 25th, 1865. Messrs. Piper and Shiffler, who will hereafter conduct their business of Bridge Builders under the name of the " Keystone Bridge Company," have for many years been engaged, both as employees and contractors, in erecting bridges of wood and iron on the Pennsylvania Rail Road and its connections. From the uniform success that has attended their plans, and the character of the work executed, I have no hesitation in recommending them to the patronage of the officers of rail road companies, for the erection of these structures, either upon the well tested plans they have been building, or upon such as may be pre- pared for them. Their facilities at Pittsburgh for building bridges will enable them to execute work with dispatch. J. EDGAR THOMSON, President. PENNSYLVANIA RAIL ROAD COMPANY . Office of the Vice President Philadelphia, July 28th, 1865. The Keystone Bridge Company for several years past have been engaged in erecting iron and wooden bridges, &c., for the Pennsylvania Rail Road Company and its connecting roads. I have had ample opportunities for observing the character of their structures, and can cheerfully testify to the responsibil- ity and skill of the Company. I consider the iron rail road bridges as constructed at their extensive works, in Pittsburgh, Penn'a., the best that I am acquainted with. THOMAS A. SCOTT, Vice President Penn'a. R. R. Co. With such powerful backing the Keystone Bridge Company soon became one of the most important factors in the business SOME GREAT STRUCTURES 51 of bridge-building in the country. The extent of the work it accomplished was officially set forth in 1883, when it was stated that the bridges built by it, if placed end to end, would measure over thirty miles in length, and that their cost exceeded $23,000,000. The most prominent of these structures, containing in each Copyright, 1902. THOMAS A. SCOTT, Who gave Andrew Carnegie his start and many a subsequent lift. case the longest span of its kind then in existence, are the fol- lowing : Steel Arch. The Mississippi River bridge at St. Louis, Mo. ; one span of 520 feet and two spans of 502 feet. Double- track and double deck railway and highway bridge. Steel Truss. The Missouri River bridge at Plattsmouth, Neb.; two spans of 402 feet each. Single-track railway bridge for the Burlington and Missouri River Railway. Also, the Ohio River bridge at Point Pleasant, W. Va., 3,805 52 IRON RAILWAY BRIDGES feet long ; channel span, 420 feet. Single-track railway bridge for the Ohio Central Railway. Iron Truss. The Ohio River bridge at Cincinnati, O. ; chan- nel span, 519 feet. Single-track railway bridge for the Cincin- nati Southern Railway. Iron Swing Bridge. One span of 472 feet, over Raritan Bay. Single-track railway bridge for the New York and Long Branch Railway. A description of the Keystone Bridge Works published by the company at this time shows that they "are exclusively de- voted tb the manufacture of bridge and structural material, fin- ished ready for erection. The shop buildings are fireproof, and cover more than three acres of ground, and the capital invested exceeds $1,000,000. The company employs over six hundred men at these works and over three hundred and fifty in the field, engaged in the erection of bridges, so that the total num- ber of men on its pay rolls is about one thousand. The works are equipped in the most comprehensive manner with special machines and tools of the most approved type, among which may be mentioned hydraulic, pneumatic and power riveting ma- chines, a i5O-foot multiple punch, shears, planers, lathes, steam hammers, drilling and boring mills, rivet and bolt making ma- chines, and a 3OO-ton hydraulic testing machine. The works are operated day and night, being lighted by the electric light after dark. The company has lately made extensive and costly additions to its plant, designed solely for the successful and economical working of steel, it having become evident that this material, in the near future, is destined altogether to take the place of iron. These additions consist in a gas heating furnace and [Kloman's] upsetting machine for the manufacture of steel eye-bars, a gas annealing furnace 54 feet long, the only furnace of this kind so far built, and a multiple reaming machine." The growth of the plant is thus seen to have been great, though not phenomenal. The position of the company at the A FINANCIAL STATEMENT 53 beginning of 1885 is shown in the following abstract from its balance sheet : Resources. Real Estate $100,650.00 Shop Equipment account 272,267.36 Construction account 345,942.43 Sharpsburg and Lawrence Br. stock 1,100.00 $719,959.79 Available accounts $229,724.39 Overdue account (Pt. Pleasant Br.) 152,752.61 Doubtful accounts 2,964.48 Amount Inventory account 299,098.33 Cash 24,947.08 $709,486.89 Total Effects $i ,429,446.68 Liabilities. Due Maury Heirs on Mortgage . . $50,000 .00 " Union Iron Mills (C. Bros. & Co) . . . 409,129.11 " Sundry accounts 134,423.37 Stock account .$447,200.00 Profit and Loss a/c 388,694.20 835,894.20 $1,429,446.68 Fourteen years later, just before the Keystone Bridge Com- pany became part of the United States Steel Corporation, its balance sheet for 1 899 showed a loss of over $67,000 on con- tracts. Its principal gains came from castings and rivets ; and, by a skilful manipulation of its "inventory adjustment," the statement was made to show a slight profit. Although one of the most talked-about branches of the Car-1 negie business, the Keystone Bridge Works was one of the least profitable, and, when stripped of its false character as a pioneer, \ the least interesting of them all. CHAPTER V A RIVALRY OF GREAT FURNACES THE Civil War, and the great demand for iron which a year or two later followed it, gave a great impulse to the chief industry of Pitts- burg ; and during the years 1866 to 1870 many schemes were laid to meet the great local demand for pig-iron. Up to that time the lack of ore at convenient distances had han- dicapped the smelting industry ; but when organized transpor- tation made the ores of Lake Superior accessible, a more , promising aspect was given to schemes for smelting iron in \ Pittsburg on a large scale. In the fall of 1870 two of these projects assumed a definite shape, and the owners of the Union Iron Mills were invited to join one of them. This was the project of a number of iron manufacturers, including Lewis Dalzell & Co., J. Painter & Sons, Graff Bennett & Co., Spang, Chalfant & Co., Henry W. Oliver of Oliver Brothers & Phillips, and William Smith, owner of a large pipe-foundry. At this time there were only seven small blast-furnaces in the Pittsburg district with a total prod- uct of some seventy thousand tons a year; and pig-iron was selling at $40 a ton. The Union Iron Mills were large consumers of pig-iron, and the scheme was not without attractions to Phipps and his asso- ciates, especially when presented by the most important firms 54 COLE MAN'S EXCELLENT ADVICE 55 in the business ; and after consultation among themselves, the partners went to Mr. William Coleman for his advice. No one was more fitted to give the young men wise counsel, for no one had a closer knowledge of the iron trade or better business judgment. Mr. Coleman considered the matter gravely, as was his habit, and then unhesitatingly advised against joining the combination. He pointed out that if the members of the Union Iron Mills Company wanted to go into the manufacture of pig- iron, it would be better for them to build one furnace themselves than to own one-seventh of two furnaces which would not be under their control or management. This advice was accepted, and the decision communicated to the gentlemen named, who at once formed the Isabella Furnace Company, and started to build two furnaces, Later they added a third. On December ist, 1870, Messrs. Kloman, Phipps, and the two Carnegies organized the firm of Kloman, Carnegie & Co. ; and when the winter was over they began the construction of a blast-furnace at Fifty-first Street, Pittsburg. This was the first Lucy furnace, so called after the wife of Thomas M. Car- negie, the daughter of Mr. Coleman, as the Isabella plant was called after Mrs. Herron, the sister of one of the members of the firm of Spang, Chalfant & Co. Important departures were made from established usages in American blast-furnace con- struction, and many English ideas were utilized. The Clinton furnace of 1859, the two Eliza furnaces of 1861, and the two Superior furnaces of 1862-63 were all forty-five feet high and twelve feet in diameter at the boshes; and owing to the ill-suc- cess of the fifteen-foot furnaces first erected, the twelve-foot bosh continued to be the favorite dimension. The Struthers furnace in Ohio, however, was fifty-five feet high, with sixteen feet diameter of bosh ; and its large output over sixteen hun- dred tons of iron in one month made it much talked about in Pittsburg, especially as this result was achieved with raw coal. The English idea of furnaces of large capacity thus came into favor ; and both the Lucy and Isabella furnaces were made sev- 5 6 A RIVALRY OF GREAT FURNACES enty-five feet high, the former with twenty feet diameter of bosh, and the latter with eighteen, afterwards changed to twenty feet. A spirit of rivalry sprang up between the two concerns from the outset. Isabella No. I and the Lucy went into blast about the same time in the early summer of 1872; and each started out by making 50 tons of pig-iron a day, which was a fair aver- age at that time. Within a few weeks both furnaces increased their output ; and by the end of the year the Lucy had made 13,361 tons, an average of nearly 500 tons a week, notwithstand- ing a chill experienced in December. The Isabella followed closely and produced 498 tons in a single week. The next year the Lucy made 87 tons in a day and 578 tons in a week. Dur- ing the early part of 1874 the Lucy kept ahead, and in Febru- ary produced 593 tons ; but by August she was overtaken by the Isabella's 612 tons. In October the Lucy shot ahead with 642 tons, and by the 24th of that month the Isabella had almost caught up, with 651 against the Lucy's 653. On that day the Lucy for the first time produced over a hundred tons ; and the achievement was greeted with 'loud hurrahs at the works, and heard of with incredulity by the iron trade. On November 2d the Isabella's output for the week was 672 tons, and the follow- ing week she broke all records with 702 tons. On December 24th she made 1 1 2 tons. Next year the contest between Mana- ger Skelding of the Lucy and Manager Crowther of the Isabella was continued as fiercely as ever ; and in October the former passed his rival with 762 tons. In the same month Isabella No. 2 crept up with 714 tons, and the following month shot ahead of the Lucy with 77 1% tons. The 800 mark was not crossed until 1878, when the Lucy made 804 tons in a single week. In March, 1880, she made 945 tons, and this was beaten by the Isabella, February, 1881, with 1,000 tons. The trade gasped with astonishment, and editors asked : " What will these Titans do next ? " On March 3r rails was ever accepted until there had first been ascertained the actual cost of every element entering into their manufacture, and options obtained on the pig-iron of which they were to be made. An eloquent testimony to the efficiency of this method of accounting was given by a workman engaged in building a heating-furnace : " There goes that book- keeper. If I use a dozen bricks more than I did last month, he knows it and comes round to ask why ! " This was no exag- geration. The minutest details of cost of materials and labor in every department appeared from day to day and week to week" in the accounts ; and soon every man about the place was made to realize it. The men felt and often remarked that the eyes of the company were always on them through the books. If the workmanship was exceptionally good, or the output beyond the high average which was insisted upon, the head of the depart- ment received a letter of congratulation and perhaps a present at Christmas. If it fell behind in either quality or output, the fact was promptly brought to his notice, and Captain Jones him- self would see if the fault lay in the machinery. If it did, he generally knew how to remedy it. If the defect was in the \ human machine, and reproof did not suffice to correct it, the man was replaced by the understudy which Jones usually had trained in view of such a contingency.* In 1877 it was found that more steel ingots were being * Dr. Frank Cowan has written a unique poem on the contrast presented by the actual condition of Braddock's Field with that of the day of the battle on July gth, 1755. Here are a couple of verses : Where the cannon of Braddock were wheeled into line. And swept through the forest with shot and with shell But woe to the Britons! In vain they combine The thunder of heaven and the lightning of hell! There the turning converter, while roaring with flame, Pours out cascades of comets and showers of stars, While the pulpit-boy, goggled, looks into the same Thinking little of Braddock and nothing of Mars. 86 THE STEEL BUSINESS made than the rail-mill could roll ; and an attempt was made to capture the local market for merchant steel. Some billets of high-carbon steel were made and submitted to a firm of buggy- spring makers. To their astonishment the material was satis- factory ; and they gave a large order for billets at three cents a pound. Then some samples of axle steel for cars were sub- mitted to the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and subjected to tests by experts who did not know that they were not the cruci- ble steel usually employed for car-axles. Again the tests were satisfactory, and large orders resulted. Next came the more difficult test of making steel for plow-shares, which required a soft ductile metal capable of being welded to sheets of crucible steel. Even these severe conditions were met. Finally the firm made steel capable of being rolled cold down to a paper thinness for use as stove-pipe, roofing-channels and cartridge cases stamped out of the sheet. So that, two years after the realization of his dreams, Tom Carnegie had the satisfaction of showing to his brother as many varieties of excellent steel made at the Edgar Thomson works as he had previously seen in England. But by this time the elder Carnegie was the most enthusiastic member of the company and needed no such re- minders. The profits of this line of business were very great ; but the capacity of the rail-mill having been enlarged, and the demands of the railroads ever increasing, the company abandoned the manufacture of merchant steel for the time being and returned to the exclusive production of rails. The demand that had thus been created, suddenly found itself shut off from supplies ; and Where the guns of the foe were revealed by a flash A report and the fall of the killed and the wounded, Till the woods were ablaze, and a deafening crash With the wail of the wounded and dying resounded ; There the ingot aglow is drawn out to a rail, While the coffee-mill crusher booms, rattles and groans, And the water-boy hurries along with his pail, Saying, Braddock be blowed! he's a slouch to Bill Jones. A RIVAL IN THE FIELD 87 an interesting development resulted. This was the establish- ment of a rival converting plant at Homestead by the group of manufacturers who had been educated in the use of Bessemer steel in place of the more costly crucible steel which they had previously used. Pending the erection of the new plant, an enterprising firm of Pittsburg brokers got Mr. McCandless, the former bookkeeper of the Edgar Thomson Company, to go to England to buy the merchant steel necessary to fill local de- mands. In two years this firm sold nearly two million dollars' worth of English steel at a profit of $5 to $15 a ton, after pay- ing forty- five percent, duty and both ocean and railroad freights. At the end of two years the Edgar Thomson Company sought to head off the independent manufacturers at Homestead and resumed the manufacture of merchant steel. The import busi- ness suddenly ceased ; and these profits with others went into the erection of a series of blast-furnaces which became the won- der of the iron-making world. Up to this time the Lucy furnaces had been supplying most of the pig-iron used by the Edgar Thomson Company; but as the members of the latter corporation were not all interested in the furnaces, there arose differences among them as to the proper price that should be paid for pig-iron. Although these differences were finally adjusted by a sliding scale based on the price of steel, the discussion developed in Shinn, McCandless, Stewart, and gcott a desire to own their own blast furnace. The desire was strengthened by the phenomenal profits of the Lucy plant, which had paid for its construction in a single year. Eventually an agreement was reached, and furnace A was erected at Braddock. This furnace was a part of the Kloman wreck, namely, the little charcoal furnace which he had built at Escanaba. It was bought for a mere song a little over $16,000 and such parts as could be transported were brought down and installed at the Edgar Thomson works. This was in 1879. Mr. Julian Ken- nedy was put in charge of its erection, and afterwards of its 88 THE STEEL BUSINESS operation. It was "blown in" in January, 1880, and yielded 442 tons of pig-iron the first week. In view of the fact that its cubical capacity was but 6,396 feet compared with 15,000 feet in the Lucy Furnace, this large product excited great astonish- ment. The fourth week, however, it made 537 tons; and dur- ing the following month (March) its output reached a total of JULIAN KENNEDY. 2,760 tons, while the coke consumption was reduced by May to 1,945 pounds per ton of iron produced. Later the output of a single week ran up to 671 tons, and the iron-making world regarded the achievement with wonder. In April, 1880, a second furnace, constructed by Mr. Ken- nedy, was put in blast, which in its third month showed an output of 4,318 tons, and at the end of the first half year was making the marvellous total of 4,722 tons in a single month. A GREAT EVOLUTION 89 During the first twelve months this furnace produced 48, 179 tons. In 1883 a third furnace was put in, and in its second month passed all previous records by a yield of 6,045 tons; and in the first twelve months made 65,947 tons of pig-iron. Dur- ing the next three years two other furnaces were erected ; and in December, 1885, one of them yielded 6,451 tons, the total for twelve months being 74,475 tons. In October, 1886, still another furnace was "blown in," and in January, 1887, three months afterwards, it produced 8, 398 tons on a coke consump- tion of 1,935 pounds per ton of pig-iron. Its total output for twelve months was 88,940 tons. These were the world records at the time ; but changes in the construction of one of the other furnaces, made under the supervision of Mr. James Gayley, one of the ablest of the so-called "young geniuses," brought the monthly record in December, 1889, to 10,603 tons on a coke consumption of only 1,756 pounds! These figures indi- cate at once the rapid growth of the business of the Edgar Thomson Steel Company and the proportionate advance made by its superintendents in the art of iron production. Both rec- ords, at that time incomparable even in this great land of rapid growth, have since been repeatedly broken by the same firm. Here this great evolution may be seen at a glance : FIRST FURNACE. Pounds of coke Years and months. Tons produced. , . per ton of iron. 1880 April 2, 723 2, 536 May 3,718 2,574 June 4,318 2,344 July 4.345 2,706 August .... 4, 60 1 2, 8 1 1 September 4,221 2,757 October 4, 722 2, 736 SECOND FURNACE. 1882 Second month 6,045 2,617 Average for twelve months 5,495 2, 570 Best month 6, 131 2, 387 THE STEEL BUSINESS THIRD FURNACE. Years and months. Tons produced. P Unds f f C ke per ton of iron. 1885 October 6,320 2,396 November 6. 306 2, 396 December 6,451 2,172 1886 January and February Shut down. March 6,352 2.105 FOURTH FURNACE.* 1886 November 6, 735 2, 128 December 7, 494 2, 105 1887 January 8,398 1,935 1889 October 6,512 2,450 November 9,097 1,897 December 10, 603 i , 756 1890 January 10, 536 I, 736 February 8,954 ^859 March 9-94 1 I 845 April 10,075 1,847 May 10,035 1,884 Hardly less remarkable were the results achieved in the con verting and rail departments. In the four months ending De- cember, 1875, 6555 tons f rails were produced, although, through a scarcity of Spiegel, the works lost two weeks. At this time a thousand tons a month was considered a good aver- age for the first year of a two five-ton converter plant. In the twenty-six working days of January, 1876, the product of 433 blows was 2,550 tons of ingots, or 2,055 tons of rails. In a single week in February 119 heats gave 707 tons of ingots, while the blooming -mill passed 709 tons, and 560 tons of rails were rolled. During the first full year of its operation (1876) the mill produced 45,563 tons of steel. The tonnage of rails was 32,228. In January, 1877, the product of a week was more than double the extraordinary record of the preceding Feb- ruary ; the output being 1,543 tons of ingots and 1,129 tons f rails. The way this was done is naively explained by a local * Twelve years later one of the above furnaces produced in one month, December, 1902, a total of 17,449 tons f pig-iron on an average coke consump- tion of 1,875 pounds. AMAZING RECORDS 91 journalist of that day: "Mr. Campbell, a roller, ten days or two weeks ago, rolled 540 rails in eleven and a half hours, which is 1 08 more than the usual run for twelve hours. This put John Little, another roller, on his mettle, and last Thursday night he rolled 600 thirty-foot rails in eleven and a half hours thus beating his competitor by 60 rails and the usual run by 1 68 rails. John may be Little, but the Edgar Thomson wants that Little here below, and wants that Little long ! " In the twenty-four working days of the following February, 915 blows produced 5,993 tons of ingots; 4,474 tons of rails were rolled and 182 tons of billets. On the 26th of February the day's product was 383 tons of ingots half as much as was produced in a week the year before. The product for March was 8,002 tons of ingots. A little less than two years before this Mr. A. L. Holley, then managing the Rensselaer Steel Works at Troy, wagered the Hon. John A. Griswold, one of the proprietors, that their Bessemer plant (two converters) could produce in one month 1,500 tons of ingots. He won his bet, of course; and the fig- ures i, 500 and 8,000 mark the advance of American steel- mak- ing at this time in twenty-three months. This rate of progress was maintained during the next two years. In September, 1879, the Edgar Thomson beat all the records of two-converter plants by producing 10,788 tons of ingots. The tonnage of a single day was 519, of a week, 2,536. The output for the year (1879) was 107,877 tons of ingots, of which 76,043 tons were rolled into rails. In November the two converters produced 13,116 tons of ingots, and the mill 10,037 tons of rails. The total rails for the working year, nine months and twenty-nine days, was 100,094 tons. Incidentally the profit of the Edgar Thomson works for 1880 amounted to $1,625,000; and there were orders booked for 8o,OQO tons for the following year. The known facts of course no outsider knew the profits, which are now made public for the first time produced surprise 92 THE STEEL BUSINESS and chagrin in competing plants. In England the news was received with doubt. "An almost incredible statement," said E. Windsor Richards, the British steel manufacturer ; and when Captain Jones, in a paper read before the British Iron and Steel Institute, gave details and dates, incredulity gave way to con- sternation, for it was plainly to be seen that England's suprem- acy in steel was at an end. Here is the amazing record in detail : NOVEMBER, 1880. Number of vessels, 2. Blows, 1,746. Average charge, 7^ tons. Tons of Ingots .............................. I3,n6| Blooms .............................. 12, i68| Rails ................................. ".037tHt Billets Merchant blooms Total finished product ..................... 11,100 At this date the Edgar Thomson had held the record for nearly three years. During the next six months it beat this record out of shape. In the first six months of 1881 the two converters produced 76,756 tons of ingots as against 55,428 A train of rolls. tons for the corresponding period of 1880 an increase of thir- ty-eight per cent. The best twenty-four hours' work was 623 tons. The product of a week was 3,433 tons; the best month, 14,033 tons more than nine times the tonnage of Holley's bet CAPTAIN JONES' TRIUMPH 93 six years before ! The rail-mill in the same time produced 65,087 tons as against 43,372 tons in the corresponding half of 1880 an increase of a fraction over fifty per cent. The aver- age weekly yield of rails was 2,503 tons as compared with 1,664 tons in 1880. These newer facts were again presented by Captain Jones to the British Iron and Steel Institute ; and before the astonished Englishmen had time fully to digest them, he sent a fresh record : November, 1881 Ingots 16, 193 tons. Rails 13,646 Best 24 hours' work Ingots 700 " " " " Rails 608 Best week's work Ingots 3,902 " " " Rails 3,202 Soon afterwards the works were enlarged and the direct metal process was introduced ; but the product was not proportion- ately great, and the record passed from Captain Jones to Mr. Julian Kennedy, who by this time had been put in charge of the Homestead works. Captain Jones' great and noteworthy triumph forms one of the most picturesque episodes in the his- tory of the Carnegie organization. * For purposes of comparison a few details of the product of the earlier steel works in America may here be given. These were, like the Edgar Thomson, all two five-ton converter plants, working eleven turns or five and one-half days a week. Tons Tons Tons Ingots, month. 500 Harrisburg. 1,700 2,000 1868 . Heats, Heats, 24 hours. week. Ingots, 24 hours. Ingots, week. 1870 Troy and Marrisburg I Cambris 1872 Harrisburg 640 187-? H arrisburg . . 25 to 30 180 890 1874, Harrisbm ; Cambria 46 189 956 " Troj CQ 267 " Troy IQC 072 *' Cambria. . 211 2,899 3,526 These were all two five-ton converter plants working eleven turns or five and one-half days a week. CHAPTER VII SOME INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY THE striking achievements just set forth formed a legitimate source of pride and exultation in the firm; and the gratification of every member was increased by the wondering comments of the trade and the public, whose attention was invited to these mechanical victories by officially verified newspaper notices and by papers and speeches before the iron and steel associations in England and America. Braddock became the Mecca of iron and steel manufacturers from all over the world. On the subject of profits there was naturally no disposition to take the public into the confidence of the firm. The protec- tion of infant industries was a subject on which there was divided opinion in the council-chambers of the nation; and manufacturers showed a proper caution in concealing the extent of their gains. Indeed, the Carnegies at this time accepted what seemed to them a large monetary loss rather than produce the books of the Edgar Thomson Steel Company in court in response to a judicial order. Now, however, that the golden harvest is safely garnered and beyond the reach of legislators and others who might " break through and steal," there is no reason why the gratifying results of the government's wise pol- icy of protection should not be set forth. The admirable system of accounting introduced by Mr. Shinn enabled the Edgar Thomson managers to see at a glance the exact cost of every one of the many operations entering into the manufacture of a ton of ingots, blooms, or rails. Every 94 EARLY COST SHEETS 95 month cost sheets were made out in which these items were given to the hundredth part of a cent. These statements were marvels of ingenuity and careful accounting. The first was issued on October 1st, 1875. It gave in de- tail the output and cost of the first month's run, together with the name of the purchasing railroads and the prices received. It was a gratifying document to the anxious partners. The output for September, 1875, was 1,1 iQ^-f J^ tons of rails. Their cost was exactly $57 a ton, including all charges, even to office expenses and maintenance of the plant. The prices received averaged $66.50 a ton at the works, thus leaving a clear profit of $9.50 a ton, and a total of over $10,000 on the month's work. In the second month the output was i,8i7^-|J-j}- tons, which cost $57.20 and sold for $66.32. At the end of the year the aver- age of four months' operations showed that ingots had cost $44.33 a ton, blooms $47. 17, and rails $58.45. The average price at which they sold was a fraction under $66 a ton, giving a total profit on rails of $41,970.06. The percentage of rails from pig-iron and spiegel was eighty and fifty-six hundredths ; and this was afterwards used as a basis on which to figure the making of contracts. During the following year the improvements in processes made by Captain Jones, already referred to, greatly increased the output and reduced the cost. On the other hand, prices also fell. Andrew Carnegie wrote this year to one of his colleagues : " We must not loose sight of the fact that the great products now made must effect prices. I look for Cost to be reached for a short time say 5O 50 at mills with us. Some concerns must stop, therefore any orders we can take netting above 52 50 had better be taken 55$ at mills is a tall price. Penna steel [i.e. Pennsylvania Steel Co.] has offered 60$ Balto to Georgia RR. but I hope to get a small order In the same letter, however, he waxes enthusiastic over the future : " What do you really figure we can put rails at cost run- 96 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY ning double 4000 Tons per Mo. on this basis Cant we shade 50$ If so where is there such a business And so alluring is the picture in his mind that in the next sen- tence he says: " I want to buy Mr. Coleman out & hope to do so. " But that is another part of the story. Concerning his great expectations at this time, the following extract from a letter of his to Shinn, dated April I3th, 1876, is interesting. He estimates future profits at forty per cent, per annum, or $300,000 net on a capital of $750,000. J 6c*~Jis [Photographic reproduction.] The price of rails this year (1876) dropped steadily from $67 in January to $52 in December; but the average price re- ceived by the Edgar Thomson Company for the sixteen months ending December 3ist, 1876, was $60.61 6 . The product for the year was 32,228 tons, and for sixteen months 38,284-5^^. FIRS 7' GREAT PROFITS 97 tons. The cost of manufacture, which averaged $56. q8 5 for the first seven months, had dropped to $53. 19 for the second seven months. The net earnings for the year amounted to $181,007.18 on a capital issue of $731,500. The Edgar Thomson Steel Works in 1890. The output of rails for 1877 was 42,826^-^ tons. Both prices and cost of manufacture show a remarkable decline. They are as follows : Cost at Price E. T. works. at mills. January $46. 67 76 $49.00 February 44. 89 49.00 March 44. io 28 49.00 April 43. 58 5 49.00 May 4S-63 35 47-25 June 42. 28 03 46.50 Cost at Price E. T. works. at mills. July $44.87 60 $45-25 August 42. 55 54 44-75 September 43.83* 44.00 October 42. oo 48 42.25 November 4O.I3 14 40.50 December 40. 3 5 88 40.50 It must not be inferred from this that during the later months of the year the company was running at a loss ; for the rails made in November and December had been sold at prices prevailing nine or twelve months earlier. At the same time 98 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY iw/4 UM vmtacvvttl cli / MMsTV^ M & 383|-|-J-- tons. The cost of ingots had been reduced to $29. 50 and that of rails to $37.77. During the year the cost of making rails did not go more than a few mills above $38. In April it was $38.o6 6 ; in May, $36.81 ; in June, $37-92 5 ; in July, $38.01 3 ; in August, $37.82 9 ; in September, $36.98 7 ; in October, $36.1 1 4 ; in No- vember, $36.41 5 ; and in December, $36. 52 5 . The average price at which they were sold was $42.50, exactly correspond- ing with Carnegie's guess. The net profits of a single month (November) amounted to a fraction over $52,000; and Andrew Carnegie, a propos of lofty heights, writes from Sorrento : ioo INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY " Pyramids & Mt Etna & Vesuvius have been our last climbs Mt E of course we did only from the base, Tell Capt Jones there was a proud little stout man who gave a wild hurrah when he saw E T ahead. Was nt it a close race with C I. Co. but they had a start, besides we had to go through the measles you know " The earnings of the Edgar Thomson works this year were $401,800 over thirty-one per cent, on its capital, which had been increased to $1,250,000. Andrew Carnegie, by the way, subscribed for the whole of this increase ; and a year later was THEORY. < 4 We are creatures of the tariff, and if ever the steel manufacturers here attempt to control or have any general understanding- among them the tariff would not exist one session of Congress. The theory of pro- tection is that home competition will soon reduce the price of the product so it will yield only the usual profit. Any understanding among us would simply at- tempt to defeat this. There never has been or ever will be such an understanding." Andrew Carnegie, in American Manufacturer, July 251 'h, shown by the balance sheet to owe the company $175,000 on account of stock subscription a simple and easy method of becoming a "majority stockholder." The next year the price of rails took a sharp upward spurt, reaching $67 a ton in December and $85 by February, 1880. In the same period the cost of manufacture was slightly re- duced. In January, 1879, ra ^ s cost $38.6o 6 a ton to make, and in May, $35.845. During the first six months of this year the Edgar Thomson works made $252,854. The second half of the year the gains were even greater. In August, with rails selling at $48, there was a clear profit of $10.50 a ton (pig-iron had PROFITS 140 PER CENT. 101 gone up $12.50); in October a fraction under $15, and by De- cember over $22 a ton net profit. The monthly output of in- gots now exceeded 10,000 tons, and of rails five to six thousand tons. " Where is there such a business ! " These golden times continued throughout* V/ie' knowing year. In January the difference between j;h'e^ Sealing giice> of rails and the cost of pig-iron was $53 a ton, the' former being $75 and the latter $22 a ton. The next month it was $65, and of this something like $40 a ton was clear profit to the Edgar Thomson Steel Company, who were running day and night and PRACTICE. Profit. Loss. EDGAR THOMSON STEEL WORKS. On rails, payment by rail pool. $123,983.28 HOMESTEAD STEEL WORKS. Axles, pool assessments .. $22,345.32 Beams, " " .. 29,392.84 Channels, " " .. 13,002.74 Armor plate pool 100,842.59 UPPER UNION MILLS. Zees,- pool assessment. .. 5,518.70 Angles, " " .. 57,755.08 Tees, " " .. 4,456.32 Beams, " " .. 351.32 Channels, " " .. 366.97 From Profit and Loss account of Carnegie Steel Company for 1899. had orders for 80,000 tons of rails. Without burdening this narrative with further details of costs and prices, it may be briefly stated that in this twelve months the Edgar Thomson works made a profit of $1,625,000. For an infant industry not out of its swaddling-clothes that was a very fair showing; and was certainly as legitimate a cause of exultation on the part of the members of the firm as those more public triumphs in me- chanics already spoken of. The highest price of rails reached this year was $85 a ton. Who shall say in presence of these facts that protection is not synonymous with prosperity? To the Carnegies the tariff was specially helpful at thi? 102 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY time, when an extraordinary demand arose for iron and steel in all its forms. The American manufacturers were unable to meet this demand, and prices rose to a point at which importa- tions of foreign steel could be made despite the high duties. {From '$'1 9, : OOc\G f oo in 1879 these importations rose to over $71,000,000 in 1880, $60,500,000 in 1881, and $68,000,000 in :82. " Simultaneously the profits of the Carnegie companies rose from $512,068.46 in 1879 to $2,000,377.42 in 1881, and $2,128,422.91 in 1882; for while the cost of rails was between $34 and $38.50, the average price received during these years was $56.26. It is obvious that but for the tariff these enor- mous gains would have been impossible; and the magnificent series of blast-furnaces, into the construction of which these profits went, would never have been built. Of course, the rail- roads of the country paid the difference; but they eventually got it back, and more, out of the enormous tonnage of ore, coke, and lime needed by the furnaces. Here, however, we are trenching upon debatable ground ; and that is neither necessary nor desirable in a work of this kind, which aims only to set out the facts and leave the reader free to draw his own conclusions. During the following years, before Mr. Frick came into su- preme power and multiplied the Carnegie profits elevenfold in eleven years, the net earnings of all the properties whose his- tory we are tracing reached the following annual totals. The average price of steel rails for these years is also given. 1883 $1,019,233.04 $37-75 4 , 1,301,180.28 30.75 5 i,i9 T >993-54 28.50 6 2,925,350.08 34.50 7 3,441,887.29 37.08 8 1,941,555.44 29.83 The causes of this abundant prosperity were not confined to the tariff, however. Some of them have been briefly adverted to in the course of this narrative ; others have not been men- tioned. A general review of this interesting division of the subject is therefore not out of place at this point in our story. CAUSES OF SUCCESS 103 First and foremost among the causes of the extraordinary success of the Edgar Thomson works is the fact that they were planned and constructed under the immediate direction of the late A. L. Holley. In his day he died in 1882 Mr. Holley was the most experienced Bessemer steel man on the continent. It was he who negotiated the purchase of the American patents in 1864, and who built the experimental works at Troy. He developed them into a commercial success, and was in charge of their management until 1867. In this year he built the Har- risburg Bessemer plant and superintended it until 1869. Then he rebuilt and enlarged the Troy works, which had been de- stroyed by fire. He next planned the Bessemer works at Chi- cago. All this was before the Edgar Thomson works were even thought of; and so completely had he identified himself with the English process of steel-making and the erection of Bes- semer converting works, that when the Edgar Thomson scheme was first mooted Mr. Holley was the only man in the country to whom a prudent manufacturer would confide the construction of a new steel plant. There were, moreover, certain inventions and improvements of his without which no converting plant was complete. In a history of the Bessemer Steel Industry in America, Mr. Robert W. Hunt thus speaks of the Edgar Thom- son works : " In arranging these works, Mr. Holley made many improve- ments over any of his previous efforts, and, assisted as he was (by Mr. P. Barnes, resident engineer, and Mr. W. R. Jones), the works stand to-day as a fit monument of the progress of the Bessemer process in this country." * * It is a little singular in view of these well-known facts that Andrew Carnegie should claim that he " built at Pittsburg a plant for the Bessemer proc- ess of steel-making, which had not until then been operated in this country." Mr. Weeks, editor of the American Manufacturer ', commenting on the comple- tion of the Edgar Thomson works remarked [September gth, 1875]: " We [in Pittsburg] have been slow to take advantage of the Bessemer process, though one at least of the owners of the Bessemer patents for this country is a prominent steel manufacturer of this city [James Park, Jr.]. This dilatoriness is the more remarkable as there has not been the least doubt as to its success and value both 104 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY In the schedule of cost of the Edgar Thomson works is an item, under patent fees, "$5,000 for Holley's Improvements," a sum equal to that paid for the license to use the Bessemer patents. This represents the measure of their value. The mechanical genius of Captain Jones, however, refused to be bound by pre- cedent, and many innova- tions were made in the equipment of the Edgar Thomson works by his force- ful insistence. An instance is here recalled : Captain Jones had ordered a certain type of open-topped housing for the rail-mill which had been found unworkable in other plants. " But, Mr. Jones," remonstrated Mr. Holley in his gentle way, "how can you justify the putting in of open- topped housings when you know that they tried them at the Lackawanna works and abandoned them ? " "Why," replied Jones in his positive way, "they put them 'And why in Hades shouldn't I?' practically and commercially. Indeed it is to this country and to an American, Mr. A. L. Holley, that we are indebted for some of the most valuable inventions connected with the Bessemer plant, inventions that, taken in connection with those of the two Fritzes, have made it possible with an American plant of a given nominal capacity, to turn out two or three times as great a product as with the English. We have so often referred to the incredulous astonishment of the mem- bers of the British Iron and Steel Institute when Mr. Holley told them what we were doing in this country, that we need not repeat the statement here. Notwithstanding this delay in taking up this process, Pittsburg can now con- gratulate herself that she has as fine a Bessemer plant as the world can boast, not so extensive as some, but as complete and perfect as any and much more so than others." SKILFUL MANAGEMENT 105 down with three-inch round iron bolts. I'm putting mine in with four-inch square steel bolts. " " I grant you," answered Mr. Holley, " that if you put them in with four-inch square steel bolts you will be able to hold them." "And why in Hades shouldn't I put 'em in with four-inch steel bolts if that will accomplish what I'm after? " In this way Jones was constantly making little changes and improvements, too insignificant to patent or even to mention outside of the works ; but they did much to ensure the perfect working of the machinery. The writer recalls one such im- provement. It was only a couple of pieces of old rail, shaped to throw the half-rolled bloom onto a moving bed as it came through the rolls ; but it saved the labor of a dozen men and did the work better. But greater than all of Jones' inventions was his progres-* sive policy. Familiar with all sorts of machinery, he saw to it that only the best and most modern appliances were installed; and thereafter he was quick to adopt improvements as fast as they were made. The young men whom he trained ably sec- onded him, as is shown in the remarkable achievements of Julian Kennedy and Gayley at the blast-furnaces, and by Schwab and Scott at Homestead. The famous scrap-heap for outgrown, not outworn, machinery was instituted by Jones, who never hesi- tated to throw away a tool that had cost half a million if a bet- ter one became available. And as his own inventions saved the company a fortune every year, he was given a free hand. Under this greatest of all the captains of the American steel industry a group of younger men grew up, trained in his broad views and habituated to his progressive methods; so that when, in 1889, he was removed from his sphere of activity in a horribly tragic way by the explosion of one of his furnaces, there were men ready trained to take up his work and continue it.* *The following passages are from a beautiful obituary notice of Captain Jones, written and published by the late Joseph D. Weeks, who was so well qualified to appreciate his genius: " He was a Captain of Industry, unsurpassed 1 06 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY Nor can the important services of Mr. Shinn be overstated. As related in another place in a letter of Andrew Carnegie, his associates used his name as a prayer of thanksgiving every night before going to bed. An example of his contributions to the prosperity of the firm may be added to those given else- where in this history. The moulds into which the molten steel was poured out of the converting- vessels were at first made out of a grade of cast- iron which soon fractured under the extremes of temperature to which they were subjected. The loss from this cause at one time added about sixty cents to the cost of making a ton of steel. In going over his cost sheets one day with Captain Jones, to try to find some detail capable of judicious pruning, Mr. Shinn 's attention was arrested by the high cost of ingot- moulds. He thereupon worked out a metal mixture capable of as an organizer, marvellous in his knowledge of detail, fertile in expedients and invention; always planning new victories and winning them. His success is written in the monster establishment at Bessemer, which will remain a monument to his energy, his skill, his achievements. The position he filled was one that demanded a higher order of executive ability than that required of the President of the United States or any of his cabinet, and this fact was recognized by a salary equal to that of the President. As an executive officer alone he was great ; but in addition to this executive ability his position demanded the possession of the inventive faculty in the highest degree, coupled with the power of analysis on the one hand and of generalization on the other that are rarely found combined in any one man. He not only knew what he wanted done but how to do it. Never trammelled by precedent he set all rules at defiance if he could more surely and quickly reach the object sought by so doing. Many of the inventions of details that have made other inventions successes and have placed Bessemer steel-making where it is to-day are his. And yet after all we doubt not that the fact that would give him the most sincere gratification is the knowledge that he preserved in such a high degree the respect, the love of the thousands that were under him, and he deserved all the love they bear him and all the respect they pay his memory. No one more honestly and with more singleness of purpose strove in every way to help and benefit those under him than Captain Jones. Himself from the ranks of labor, he never forgot the fact and looked at all questions affecting the relations of em- ployer and employed in the works he managed from the standpoint of both of these relations ; and both employer and employed have come to realize that his judgment was in the main wise as they have always believed it was honest." American Manufacturer, October 4th, 1889. SPIRIT OF COMPETITION 10; greater resistance to alternations of heat and cold, and had some moulds cast of this at the foundry of Macintosh & Hemphill. Instead of being destroyed after less than twenty heats, as here- tofore, the new moulds withstood the strain of sixty heats or more; and the ingot- mould-cost per ton of steel dropped from sixty to fifteen cents. On a product of 10,000 tons a month, the saving was over $40,000 a year a sum almost sufficient in itself to determine the financial success or non-success of the works under ordinary conditions of trade. Nor was this all. The new moulds were made of Bessemer iron ; and when they broke they were simply passed into the converter and made into steel rails. This metal mixture was kept a secret for some years, during which the Edgar Thomson Company had an important advan- tage over competitors. After a time the secret was given to Leander Morris, in whom Andrew Carnegie, his cousin, had an interest of a peculiarly close and confidential nature. This is a story in itself, full of romance and pathos. Mr. Morris was a member of the foundry firm of Morris & Marshall, and for years they had a practical monopoly of the business of casting ingot- moulds. Another cause of success is to be found in the spirit of com- < petition which animated every man about the place. A keen rivalry had existed from the first among the Bessemer steel men; and this was intensified by the building of the Edgar Thomson works, with all the improvements resulting from Mr. Holley's ten years of experiments. Captain Jones has graphi- , cally told the story of this rivalry in the paper already referred to, which was read at the meeting of the British Iron and Steel Institute in May, 1881. He says: ' " Now as to the cause of the great output of American steel works. On the introduction of the Bessemer process in America, quite a number of young men, who believed that the process would revolutionize the metallurgical world, became anxious to io8 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY, identify themselves with its development. At the Troy works, which may be considered the pioneer Bessemer works of the country, Mr. A. L. Holley was applying his brilliant talents to the perfecting of American plants. Forsythe, of the North Chicago works, was also assiduously studying the process. A few years later the Pennsylvania Steel Works, the model of nearly all the subsequent American works, were constructed by Mr. Holley. Some years later still the Cambria works were built. At all these works there were ambitious young men closely studying and carefully watching all possible points of development. From the Cambria graduated Mr. R. W. Hunt, general superintendent of the Albany and Rensselaer works; Jones and Fry, at present connected with the Cambria ; Rinard, of the Edgar Thomson ; Stanton, of the Vulcan ; Williams, of the new Pittsburg Bessemer works ; and myself. Mr. Holley, as editor of Van Nostrand's Eclectic Magazine, a few years ago, records as follows : ' We have information from the (Penn.) steel works that on Tuesday of last week they had succeeded in making eight blows or conversions in ten hours. ' I quote from memory. Soon the Cambria Iron Works commenced to creep up to thirty-six heats or about one hundred and sixty tons in twenty- four hours. After the dispersion at the Cambria works attend- ant on the death of Mr. George Fritz, one of the ablest of Amer- ican metallurgists, Mr. Hunt assumed control of the Bessemer department of the Cambria works. A strong rivalry imme- diately commenced between these two gentlemen ; and great was my astonishment at this time on receiving from Mr. Hunt a telegram stating that 'in the last twenty-four hours we have made fifty heats, or about two hundred and fifty tons.' This achievement caused great surprise in the Bessemer world. In the meantime Forsythe, having concluded his studies at Troy, had assumed the reins at North Chicago ; and reports soon cir- culated about what he was doing there. This only stirred up Messrs. Fry and Hunt and Liebert, of Bethlehem, to greater achievements ; and so the product kept on increasing, while we of tJie Edgar Thomson were compelled (being engaged in erect- ing the works) to listen to tJieir wonderful stories. In 1875 the Edgar Thomson began operations, followed soon afterwards by the Scranton and Vulcan works, while the Joliet works under an efficient organization had again entered the field. In the latter year the output of American works began to assume those proportions which have caused so much surprise CAPTAIN JONES' EXPLANATION 109 in England. The output soon reached 1,500 tons of ingots a week, then 1,800 tons, then 2,000 tons, and ultimately increas- ing to 3,000, 3,100, 3,200, and 3,300. I am frequently asked by people, 'Where will you Bessemer men stop? ' and 'What is the limit of your production? ' I can only reply : 'Ask some one who knows more about it than I do.' But I really believe we are on the verge of the elastic limit of production, although it may yet reach a product of 14,500 to 15,000 tons for what I term a 'long month ' of twenty-one days per pair of converters. [Julian Kennedy afterwards brought the record to over 19,500 tons.] The output of American works is governed by the facili- ties for getting the ingots out of the road. This is the sticking- point just now. [This difficulty was met by casting the ingots on trucks and hauling them away by locomotives.] Therefore the works that cast their tonnage in the least number of moulds have a decided advantage in reaching the ultimate production of the present American or Holley plant. The race, so far as the Edgar Thomson works are concerned, will soon cease. A few months more and the Edgar Thomson will change from a two seven-ton converter plant to a three ten-ton plant, and then our efforts willbe concentrated upon keeping pace with the Bethle- hem four-vessel plant, and with the North Chicago and Pennsyl- vania Steel Company's three-vessel plants.* Next to the strong but pleasant rivalry of the young men who have assumed control of the works, and who have worked hard and faithfully to excel, the development of American prac- tice is due to the esprit de corps of the workmen after they get fairly warmed to the work. As long as the record made by the works stands the first, so long are they content to labor at a moderate rate ; but let it be known that some rival establish- ment has beaten that record, and then there is no content until the rival's record is eclipsed. Another marked advantage which the American works have is the diversity of nationality of the workmen. We have *One day in November, 1891, the mill started out to beat the best day's record of the South Chicago mill of the Illinois Steel Company, which was 1,700 tons. The attempt was a remarkable success, as the following figures show : Rails made in twenty-four hours !,924 tons. Ingots, same time 2,074 " Best twelve hours (night turn) rails 981 " " " ingots 1,087 " Best run two hours 201 ' ' no INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY representatives from England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and all parts of Germany, Swedes, Hungarians, and a few French and Italians, with a small percentage of colored workmen. This mixture of races and languages seems to give the best results, and is, I think, far better than a preponderance of one nation- ality. In increasing the output of these works, I soon discovered it was entirely out of the question to expect human flesh and blood to labor incessantly for twelve hours, and therefore it was v decided to put on three turns, reducing the hours of labor to eight. This proved to be of immense advantage to both the company and the workmen, the latter now earning more in eight hours than they formerly did in twelve hours, while the men can work harder constantly for eight hours, having sixteen hours for rest. Another important matter connected with fast working is . the maintenance of the machinery. As fast as the weak parts in the machinery are developed they are strengthened. In all new machinery the aim is to get an excess of strength; the usual factor of safety in new rolling machinery is not allowable. The machinery must be made extra heavy and strong, so that the inertia of the mass will swallow all strains thrown upon it." * Following in importance the protective tariff, the mechani- cal excellence of the works, the inventive skill of its managers, and the rivalry of competing plants, as factors in the extraordi- nary success of the Edgar Thomson Steel Company, come cer- tain personal influences. These were subtle and vague, and not easily traceable except in results which were rarely visible to outsiders. As a consequence, biographers and historians have been led into all sorts of fanciful conceits concerning the rela- tive importance of some of the individuals connected with the concern. One closely associated with the group, being asked to define the functions of the various partners in the Edgar Thomson Company, recently made the following trite comparison : " Shinn bossed the show; McCandless lent it dignity and standing; * Which recalls Captain Jones' remark to Holley on the advantage of heavy steel bolts to hold the housings of the rail-mill. A HAPPY SIMILE in Phipps took in the pennies at the gate and kept the pay-roll down; Tom Carnegie kept everybody in a good humor, with Dave Stewart as his understudy." "And Andrew Carnegie? " he was asked. " Oh, Andy looked after the advertising and drove the band wagon ! " was the ready reply. With due allowance for its humorous exaggeration, this blunt comparison fairly represents the facts. The high com- mercial and social standing of Mr. McCandless not only gave dignity to the enterprise, but won financial support for it in its days of need. Without him, the company would hardly have tided over the troublous times of 1873 and the lean years following the panic. The special capacity of Mr. Phipps has been abundantly illus- trated in connection with preceding enterprises. Mr. T. M. Carnegie's abilities were too numerous and complex to be summed up in a sentence. He was a man of sterling integrity ; and it was a common say- ing in Pittsburg that his word was better than some men's bond. He had remarkable judgment; and his opinion on commercial questions was valued above that of much older and more experienced men. Quick and keen in his perceptions, cautious but progressive in his ideas, faithful to his engagements, and just in all. his dealings, he gave to his company that which corporations are habitually lacking, namely, a conscience. His death in 1886, at the early age of forty- three, was a loss not only to his associates, but to the whole business world of .Pittsburg. To this day all who knew him, great and small, rich and poor, workman and master, revere his memory and regret his loss. Mr. Stewart never 'Andy drove the band wagon." 112 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY sought prominence, and was content to the day of his death, in 1889, to merge his own personality in the organization he worked for. Devoted to Tom Carnegie, he allowed no personal injury to affect his loyalty to his friend; and more than once he stoically accepted the rough rebukes of the elder Carnegie because Tom wished for peace. Once, indeed, exasperated at the gibes given at his own table, he rose in anger, saying that the bounds of all reason had been reached and the laws of hospitality outraged ; but the apology which Tom arranged was at once accepted and peace was restored. The part at first selected by An- drew Carnegie for himself was the development of outside trade and ' the procurement of orders. Here he displayed an originality so marked that it amounted to gen- ius. Endowed with a ready wit, an excellent memory for stories, and a natural gift for reciting them, he became a social favorite in New York and Washington, and never missed a chance to make a useful acquaint- ance. His mental alert- ness, ready speech, and enthusiastic temperament made him a delightful addition to a dinner party; and many an uncon- scious hostess, opening her doors to the little Scotchman from Pittsburg, has also paved the way to a sale of railroad material, i Carnegie early found that his power to promote sales grew in proportion to his own importance. His natural love of promi- nence was thus fortified by its commercial value ; and he lost no opportunity of adding to his interest in the firm. As a result "An unconscious hostess.' UNFRIENDLY RIVALRIES 113 he was soon regarded as the sole founder and builder of the enterprise which bore his name, and his partners, if thought of at all, were ranked with the other machinery of tha works. At first Andrew Carnegie's attention was principally occu- pied in schemes of his own construction companies for new railroads and bridges, and the marketing of bonds. But as the iron businesses in which he was financially interested grew in importance, he gave them more of his time and attention. Re- lieved of the routine of detail and the never-ending cares of management which were his partners' daily lot, he had a mind free to range over the industrial field, picking up scraps of information concerning the requirements of railroads, and bring- ing news of many a large contract. Supplied with daily reports of the product of every department of each of the works, he had leisure to make comparisons, and to prod with a sarcastic note any partner or superintendent whose work did not rank with the best. In time he became very expert at these postal proddings ; and with half-a-dozen scathing words scribbled on the back of his address card, he could spur the best of his managers to still more heroic achievements. Captain Jones, who was too high- spirited a war-horse to brook such spurrings, sent in his resigna- tion with almost rhythmical periodicity, and was then tempted back into harness by a handsome gift and still handsomer apol- ogy. As he put his head into the halter again, he would fling a gibe at the other managers who took their rowellings more tamely. " Puppy dog number three," he would say in sarcastic parody of the scribblings from New York, "you have been beaten by puppy dog number two on fuel. Puppy dog number two, you are higher on labor than puppy dog number one." And so on. This was the lighter side of the system of un- . friendly competition which Andrew Carnegie originated and fos- tered. Some of these managers and partners did not speak to each other for years, so skilfully were their jealousies and rival- ries played upon ; and there was hardly a man at the head of 8 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY any department of the Carnegie concerns whose flanks were not ripped open, in the fierce race for supremacy. Some, like Cole- man, Shinn, Scott, Griffin, Kennedy, Abbot, and Walker, re- volted and flung back the taunts with interest. Others let their anger be transmuted into fresh energy and a determination to win. These are the ones who remained and became " young geniuses. " " You cannot imagine the abounding sense of freedom and relief I experience as soon as I get on board a steamer and sail past Sandy Hook," once said Andrew Carnegie to Captain " Carnegie did not roost in the tree. . . . He would sit afar off, on the rail-fence, apparently idly watching- the spaders and waterers and trimmers and caterpillar- killers, all desperately at work, with the sweat stream- ing. Presently he would descend from his rail-perch, catch up a great club and lay frantically about him. Bruised skulls here ; broken skulls there ; corpses yonder ; fellows with raw heads and aching- bones, crawling rapidly into the cover of the tall grass ; im- precations filling the air. A scene of peaceful industry transformed into a shambles. Grinning- grimly at his club, Carnegie would stroll back to his rail-perch, usually Skibo." "The Men who Made the Steel Trust" by David Graham Phillips. Jones. " My God, think of the relief to us ! " exclaimed Jones with his usual bluntness. The retort was not all in jest. In his social campaign Andrew Carnegie did not neglect the quest for political influence. The Government brooded lov- , ingly over the industries which paid their owners fifty to a hun- dred per cent, per annum ; and there is a law of political equiva- lents which Mr. Carnegie never ignored. The leaders of both parties became his intimate friends ; and liberal subscriptions to r their respective campaign funds justified his reliance on their favor. "How would you like to invest $10,000 in the sena- torial fight in ? " wrote James G. Elaine in 1886. As the "A BAND OF DEVOTED FRIENDS" 115 Keystone Bridge Company had an uncollectable account of some $200,000 against one of the junior American republics for a steel building at the New Orleans Exposition, Mr. Carne- gie was glad to make the investment ; and the friendly offices of the State Department secured an early settlement of the claim. No one had more faith than Carnegie in the helpful effect of a congratulatory telegram to a president-elect or a new senator; nor did ever a Scotchman better gauge the trade possibilities of a dinner at which Western congressmen might meet the great ones of earth in literature and philosophy. Never was " My partners are not only partners, but a band of devoted friends, who never have a difference. I have never had to exercise my power, and of this I am very proud." " I never enjoyed anything more than to get a sound thrashing in an argument at the hands of these young geniuses." ' ' When I could not bring my associates in business to my views by reason I have never wished to do so by force. As for instructing or compelling them under the law to do one thing or another, that is simply ab- surd. I could not if I would, and I would not if I could." Andrew Carnegie. band wagon driven with such skill. The box of Carnegie's chariot became the "seats of the mighty." Herbert Spencer's acquaintance was made on board a transatlantic liner, as was that of sundry British peers ; and the visits of these personages v to the Pittsburg works were reported in a thousand newspa- pers from Maine to California and from Land's End to John O'Groats. And so a politico-social campaign went on hand in hand with the rail, bridge, armor-plate, and structural-steel business, through seasons of opera, concerts, lecturings, and book-publish- ings, until the name Carnegie was written in bright letters n6 INSIDE FINANCIAL HISTORY across the sky of two hemispheres, and people forgot that there were any other steel works in the world. Meanwhile in Pittsburg the partners worked steadily on, building dollar by dollar the great golden pyramid by which their majority stockholder was to be immortalized. Steel works by night. Copyright by S. S. McClure Co. CHAPTER VIII QUARRELS AND EJECTURES DESPITE this great and uninterrupted good fortune, the internal diScord in which all the Carnegie enterprises were born and brought up continued without abatement, and wrought many changes in the person- nel of the organization. Ranking with other evolutionary factors in the development of the business, and more influential than any in stamping it with the Carnegie personality, these disagreements are deserving of a more than passing reference. At the organization of the steel company, Andrew Carne- gie's interest was one-third of the whole; but it appears Jrom a printed statement of Mr. Shinn that he early developed " a sentimental desire to have an even half." This he got, and more, as one by one the founders of the organization dropped away from it. The first to go was Mr. Coleman ; and his interest was bought by Mr. Carnegie "after a bitter quarrel between them," to quote from a letter addressed to the author by one of the old members of the corporation. Before its purchase, however, Andrew Carnegie repeatedly speaks of this Coleman interest as a desirable acquisition. In the letter of April I3th, 1876, now before me, immediately following the exclamation quoted, " Where is there such a business ! " he goes on to say : " I want to buy Mr. Coleman out & hope to do so. Kloman will have to give up his interest. These divided between Tom, Harry You and I would make the Concern a close Corporation Mr. Scott 9 loan is no doubt in some Bankers hands & may also 117 us QUARRELS AND EJECTURES be dealt with after a little then we are right & have only to watch the Bond conversions." Photographic reproduction of a letter written by Andrew Carnegie on April i3th, 1876, in which he outlines plans for the purchase of partners' interests. In a letter written a little earlier he mentions the easy terms on which he hoped to acquire the Coleman interest : "Yesterday in talking with Mr Coleman ... I said I would be willing to take his 100.000$ stock 5 years at Par 6% int pr ann payable semi annually principal payable after 5 years in i 2 & 3 years say He wanted much better bargain but I would do no better finally he said to write Tom what I offered & he would talk over it I suppose it will be arranged." And so it was. At the same time disagreements arose among the other members of the firm, growing out of the price A SCHEME OF ELIMINATION 119 to be paid the Lucy Furnace Company for pig-iron ; and Messrs. T. M. Carnegie and Phipps sold half of their stock in the Edgar Thomson to Andrew Carnegie, refusing to engage in the erec- tion of a second Lucy stack unless he bought it. The dispute concerning pig-iron was finally settled by a sliding scale follow- ing the prices of rails; but before long fresh troubles arose through the inferior quality of the Lucy product. On April 27th, 1877, Mr. Shinn, general manager, in a letter marked " private and confidential," wrote to Andrew Carnegie as follows : " Another matter comes up in this connection for most seri- ous consideration. It is this. If the L. F. Co. is to furnish us the most, or all of, our metal, it is of the utmost consequence that we should have the fullest confidence in each other, and that we could feel assured at all times, that no material would be used to cheapen the metal, that would or could injure our product. That the cinder used last year did this I am very well satisfied ; and when Mr. Phipps assured me in January last that no cinder was being used, and that no change would be made without consulting or advising us, I felt easy ; but we have had some ' split ends' among our Lake Shore rails and now comes the (to me) painful rumor that cinder is being used. You are most interested in our getting and keeping a reputation for making the best rails in America, and to do that we must use the best material. My reputation, as well as my capital, is in- volved in the matter, and if I am to make it my life occupation, and cut loose from all RR. associations, it can only be, as you can readily see, upon a basis of full confidence between us, and between us all as associates, in all our relations." The difficulties thus arising, joined no doubt to the ever- increasing output of the steel works, developed in the partners of the Edgar Thomson Company not interested in the Lucy furnaces a determination to make their own pig-iron. And thus it came about that the Edgar Thomson people erected their own blast-furnaces and inaugurated a new era in iron- making. But the cabal resulting from these disagreements precipitated the "ejecture" of those who were most strenuous in their opposition to the Lucy Company having any undue ad- vantage through their connections with the Edgar Thomson. 120 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES The next one to go out was Andrew Kloman, under circum- stances already related. He had an interest of $50,000 in the Edgar Thomson, which Andrew Carnegie acquired. Then came the little fellows who held the convertible bonds and wanted stock for them. To these Andrew Carnegie was frank enough to say that they were not wanted and that their most profitable course would be to quietly take back their money and get out. The privilege of conversion was highly valued when these bonds were sold, because it gave their holders a speculative chance of becoming permanently interested in the concern if it proved successful, and if not they still held a lien on a property that had cost three times the sum of their mort- gage. But the privilege was disputed; and in most cases the bondholders chose to accept their money rather than go into litigation with the now powerful corporation. Young Gardiner M. McCandless, however, insisted on his rights. He was reluc- tantly admitted to the firm, and became Carnegie's secretary. Colonel Scott and Andrew Carnegie had a timely quarrel, and the former took back his money, declaring that nothing would induce him to become permanently interested in the Edgar Thomson. As for Mr. J. Edgar Thomson, he died be- fore the bonds matured, and his executors also waived their rights and accepted cash in discharge of the obligation. The other partners included in the scheme of elimination were under a surveillance which they little suspected. Some of them had engaged in a disastrous stock speculation, which Andrew Carnegie, referring to Mr. McCandless' share in it, characterized in one of his letters as " miserable conduct," and hinted at certain changes he had long had in mind. But before this he wrote to Mr. Shinn (May ist, 1877) : "There are possible Combinations in the future It is n't likely McCandless Scott & Stewart will remain with us. I scarcely think they can I know Harry & Tom have agreed with me that you out of the entire lot would be wanted as a future partner & I think W3 will one day make it a DEATH OF McCANDLESS 121 partnership Lucy F Co U Mills, E T &c & go it on that basis the largest and strongest Concern in the Country." Mr. McCandless, however, was eliminated by the kindly hand of death; and Andrew Carnegie's grief was intense and profound. Writing from Bombay on February 22d, 1879, where he heard the sad news, he says : " It does seem too hard to bear, but we must bite the lip & go forward I suppose assuming indifference but I am sure none DAVID McCANDLESS, First Chairman of the Edgar Thomson Steel Company. of us can ever efface from our memories the image of our dear, generous, gentle & unselfish friend To the day I die I know I shall never be able to think of him without a stinging pain at the heart His death robs my life of one of its chief pleasures, but it must be borne, only let us take from his loss one lesson as the best tribute to his memory, let us try to be as kind and 122 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES devoted to each other as he was to us. He was a model for all of us to follow One thing more we can do attend to his affairs & get them right that Mrs. McCandless & Helen may be provided for I know you will all be looking after this & you know how anxious I shall be to cooperate with you." The partners accordingly carried Mr. McCandless' interest undisturbed until Mr. Carnegie's return the following summer. The great profits made during this period have been adverted to, as well as Carnegie's joy on Mount Etna or some such elevation. Despite this, he insisted on the purchase of Mr. McCandless' interest at the book value shown by the appraisement made be- fore Mr. McCandless' death. The member of the old corpora- tion previously quoted writes me : " But this decision was not made until late in July follow- ing, after Mr. Andrew Carnegie's return from his trip around the world, when large profits had been made and still larger were shown by the orders entered on the books for delivery dur- ing the following nine months. . . . Legally the company acted fairly." No share of these profits was included in the price paid to Mrs. McCandless, and she only received some $90,000 for her husband's interest. It had cost $65,000 in cash. Mr. Shinn was the next to go out of the concern ; and the story of his leave-taking found its way into the courts. When Mr. McCandless died, Mr. Shinn expected to be made chairman in his place. He was the largest stockholder after the elder Carnegie ; and as he had done much to make the business a suc- cess, he felt that his services and interest entitled him to the most honorable position in the company. But Carnegie, who controlled the board, had left orders before leaving on his trip, that in the event of a vacancy in the chair his brother was to be elected to fill it. This was accordingly done, Shinn protest- ing by letter to Carnegie in Egypt, and plainly setting forth his claims and disappointment. Carnegie replied, urging Shinn to " let the matter rest until my return, & we will meet as friends THE FIGHT WITH SHINN 123 desirous of pleasing each other, & I am sure our happy family will remain one. " Shinn's claim was a reasonable one, judged in the light of the letters he had received from Carnegie. " Remember I can see no fault with your management as it is," Carnegie wrote him in August, 1876. " On the contrary I assure you there are few nights in which before sleeping I dont congratulate myself at our good fortune in having you there Tom and Harry ditto but we. dont think we can have too much of 'so good a thing ' & want somehow or other to get you root & branch." A)e * ,~ j?vL+. ,)^ c* &it> J <2 c/ A*-~T~st3 Photographic reproduction of part of a letter from Andrew Carnegie to William P. Shinn. Again : " I like the tone of your personal letter. Much Have al- ways known you would find it necessary if E. T. proved what 124 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES we expected to give it all your time and thought It is a Grand Concern & sure to make us all a fortune. With you at the helm, & my pulling an oar outside, we are bound to put it at the head of rail making concerns My preference would be for you to double your interest & manage it to the exclusion of everything else we to carry the second 50.000$ until you could pay it & allow you to draw on a/c profits any sum required for expenses, but this shall be as you prefer. We shall not quarrel about Your Compensation " Accordingly Shinn had resigned his position on the rail- roads, had bought a part of the Coleman interest, and was now giving his whole time to the management of the Edgar Thom- son works. On the elder Carnegie's return, however, the chairmanship was permanently vested in his brother Tom. Meanwhile other matters of dispute had arisen between Shinn and his colleagues which had become the subject of out- side gossip and comment ; so that the slight was doubly felt by him, and he sent in his resignation. In his letter of withdrawal from the management of the company, dated September i3th, 1 879, he says : " I have full confidence in the pecuniary success of the E. T. S. Co. Limited and purpose to remain your business associate; and it will be my desire, as it will be my interest, to advance its success by any and all means in my power. " This, however, did not accord with Carnegie's plans, nor with the policy, now first inaugurated, that no officer of the company should retain his interest after he had resigned his office ; and a committee was appointed by the Board of Managers to confer with Mr. Shinn about the purchase of his interest. This committee consisted of John Scott and Andrew Carnegie. The former has reduced his statement of the transaction to writing. It is as follows : *In this and other Carnegie letters the spelling and punctuation of the originals are preserved. Plate VI, WILLIAM P. SHINN FIRST MANAGER OF THE EDGAR THOMSON STEEL WORKS "MALICIOUS MENDACITY" 125 'In the month of September 1879, the latter part of the month, the E. T. Board met and accepted the resignation of Mr. Shinn. At the meeting the board appointed Mr. Carnegie and myself to confer with Mr. Shinn about the purchase of his in- terest- in the Company. After the board adjourned Messrs. Carnegie, Shinn and myself remained, the others having retired. Mr. Shinn then proposed to sell his whole interest for a certain sum, the amount I have forgotten. Mr. Carnegie refused to recognize that the stock in dispute had any value to him. Mr. Carnegie offered Mr. Shinn on behalf of the E. T. Co. one hun- dred and five thousand dollars for his interest standing in his name on the books of the Company, which offer Mr. Shinn de- clined. Some time during the interview Mr. Carnegie made the remark that he would rather have given one hundred thousand dollars than have Mr. Shinn leave. The next day when the board were about ready to meet, knowing Mr. Shinn was at the office of F. Wayne Co. I went up to see Mr. Shinn and urged him to accept the offer of $105,- ooo which had been made him the day previous by Mr. Carne- gie. At my earnest solicitation Mr. Shinn finally gave his con- sent to accept the offer. Mr. Shinn shortly after came down to the Edgar Thomson office and asked Mr. Carnegie and myself to come out into the hall. Mr. Shinn then stated to Mr. Car- negie and myself, that he was willing to accept the offer of $105,000 whenever they could agree on a satisfactory agreement to refer the question of the stock in dispute to arbitrate. This being reported to the board, they authorized the officers to close the purchase. The board did not make the condition for the agreement to arbitrate, that having been done by Mr. Shinn." The agreement to arbitrate here referred to concerned the right and title of Mr. Shinn to the stock which Andrew Carne- gie had sold him out of that which he had bought from Messrs. Coleman, Phipps, and T. M. Carnegie. It was a full share of $50,000. Mr. Carnegie denied Shinn's right to this stock and the premium to which it had advanced, on the ground that part of the consideration Shinn had agreed to pay for it was that he would remain general manager of the works as long as Mr. Car- negie wanted him. Shinn indignantly repudiated such an un- derstanding, which he characterized as " slavery; " and the mat- ter was submitted by agreement to the arbitrament of Messrs. 126 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES B. F. Jones, John W. Chalfant, and William Thaw, prominent business men of Pittsburg. The documents in the case assumed voluminous proportions, as the disputants brought charge and countercharge against each other ; and some of them became almost virulent in character. Andrew Carnegie injected into his statement of the case charges against Shinn and his friends amounting to conspiracy to de- fraud ; but unfortunately he entered into irrelevant details and tripped up on his facts. The most singular of the lapses of memory by which his case was injured was contained in the following statement to the arbitrators : " When in India I was rendered anxious by receiving a tele- gram from him [Shinn] asking me to get an important letter at Aden, and reply by telegraph. You can imagine what thoughts arose. The most probable emergency that suggested itself to my mind was that some important financial question had arisen, and that it was necessary parties should receive my personal guarantee in some way, and at once. It was several weeks be- fore I could obtain the expected letter, and judge my surprise, nay rather indignation, when the document proved to be five closely written pages in Mr. Shinn's own handwriting, setting forth his personal disappointment and dissatisfaction at the board of managers not having seen fit to promote him to the chairmanship, in place of our late lamented friend Mr. McCand- less, I was requested to telegraph a reply, instructing the board to undo its action. Instead of this, I wrote an indignant answer, but as there were many days before the mail left, I had time to reflect, and finally destroyed the letter, and sent instead a short note asking him to await my return." Shinn's answer, for a few pages, was a clever piece of judi- cial reasoning; but having been accused in no equivocal terms of dishonorable and contemptible practices, he later allowed himself the free use of his somewhat caustic pen, and marred his otherwise able presentation of the case by charging his opponent with " wilful and malicious mendacity. " "In regard to his [A. C.'s] statements," he says, "it may well be said as has been said of a much more prominent person, SHINN "ON TRIAL" 127 'Where most people remember, his lordship fancies, and in his case what is most convenient naturally offers itself. This has very much increased his brilliancy, for the process leaves its practicer utterly unhampered. But nobody should ask for both strict accuracy and Lord B.'s quick free wit. It is demanding an unreasonable combination.' So much on the 'go-as-you- please ' style is Mr. Carnegie's historical account of our transac- tions, that the above quotation is unavoidably suggested. . . . Mr. Carnegie refers to a telegram which he received in India, asking him to get an important letter at Aden, and reply by telegraph, and tells you of his emotions when he re- ceived it. I sent no such telegram to Mr. Carnegie while he was in India, nor indeed was any such telegram sent him at any time. The letter he refers to was written to him Feb. 22nd, 1879, ad- dressed to him at Aden, which was the address he gave for let- ters to be sent at that date. The author of 'Around the World ' says: 'Bombay, Monday, Feb. 24th, We sailed at six in the evening by the splendid P. and O. steamer, Pckin/ that being the date he left India. On March I2th we received a telegram from him dated Cairo, Egypt, and on that date I telegraphed him as follows : Carnegie, Cairo. Bison, Cling, Black, Cloak, Angel, Feb. 22nd, Aden, Bacon, telegraph and mail. Shinn. The first four words related to our profits in Jan. and Feb., the balance is translated thus : Angel. Have you received our letter of Feb. 22nd, Aden ? Bacon. Where shall we address you, telegraph and mail ? Not one word, as you will see, about answering by tele- graph, or about letter being important, and sent sixteen days after he left India. But you would expect a matter which caused him so much anxiety as he alleges to be mentioned in his letters, and what does he say? In his letter dated Bombay, Feb. 22nd, he does not mention it, for the good reason that he knew nothing of it. In his letter dated Sorrento, March 23rd, the first received after he got the telegram, he writes, 'I expected your Aden letter to-day, but next mail will undoubtedly bring it, reaching me at Naples, Wednesday even- ing on our arrival.' In his next, dated Rome, March 29th, he says : 'Yours from Aden not yet received although I ordered it here. May come Tuesday, when I will telegraph/ 123 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES You find no trace of anxiety or other deep emotion in these letters. . . . To complete the record I inclose my pressed copy of the Aden letter which instead of 'five closely written pages/ con- sists of two closely written and one-half page, not very close. In it you will look in vain for any request to telegraph a reply. In fact the whole of these emotions over the Aden letter seem to be a case of 'reflex action ' excited by the claim in contro- versy. You will note in his reply to the Aden letter that he says : * Let the matter rest until my return and we will meet as friends desirous of pleasing each other, and I am sure our happy family will remain one.' This was his 'indignation' referred to. He has told you how we 'met as friends ' in the first con- versation we had on the subject, when he says : 'And upon my return and before any question of this claim arose, I told him I had twice already bought his life work,' etc. ; he also insulted me still further by telling me, in reference to the increase of salary voted me unanimously by the Board, 'You might as well have put your hand in my pocket and taken out $750 ' (his half of it). On the same day he told another person who subsequently informed me that he 'hoped most sincerely he (I) would resign his (my) connection with the E. T. Steel Co., Limited, as he was determined to get rid of him ' (me), and later on, in the same conversation, he said I had better resign now, as he would make it so warm for me that he would have my resignation before Christmas. (Sworn evidence of this statement can be had if desired by the arbitrators.) Without further conversation with, or notice to me, at a meeting of the Board of Managers held late in July, at which he had no official standing or right (not being a member), he in- sultingly demanded my resignation as Treasurer, under the false pretence that I had myself suggested it in my Aden letter, which pretence he repeats in his statement to you. . . . He thus took from me, as by violence, the responsible and honorable office of Treasurer, which I had held since the forma- tion of the company and now comes before you asking 'equity,* alleging that I left the company without his consent. I myself saw a letter in his handwriting, in which he said, referring to me byname: 'Thank God his name is off our paper,' and 'Mr. Shinn is on trial,' etc. Under these circumstances you will not wonder that I left CHARGES OF CONSPIRACY 129 Mr. Carnegie's company, and I do not therefore feel called upon to reply to his history of my departure." To all this Carnegie retorted in kind, becoming if possible more offensive than before in his charges of conspiracy. " In a very short time," he says, " the Edgar Thomson Company would have been fleeced upon most of its supplies. With the railway manager bribed and the purchaser of our supplies interested, the combination seemed complete, and does credit to the genius of our late general manager." This ended for the time being the effort at a "peaceful " settlement, for Shinn angrily revoked his agreement to arbitrate and withdrew all the papers. On the same day he tendered the purchase-money of the stock in dispute, and brought suit in the Allegheny County Court. Carnegie then petitioned for removal of the case to the United States Circuit Court, which was granted ; and Shinn in his turn secured an order of court for the production of the Edgar Thomson books. For obvious reasons this was a measure distasteful in the highest degree to the Carnegies; and when the case was called for trial on June 1 6th, 1 88 1, an adjournment was asked for an hour. The law- yers then got together in an adjoining room and patched up another agreement to arbitrate. The case was thereupon sub- mitted to the same arbitrators as before on the old pleadings, subject, however, to a re-statement of Shinn 's claim on the question of value, and leaving that question wholly to the arbi- trators free from the restrictions of the original submission, which limited the premium to fifty per cent. This was an im- portant gain for Shinn, since it left to arbitration the question of Shinn 's right to participate in the enormous increase in value which the stock had undergone during the previous two years. The exact terms of the award were long kept secret ; but it is betraying no confidence to state now that Shinn won on the main issue and received his full claim with a substantial pre- mium representing the increased value of his stock. It was just under $200,000. But he lost his contention that he could re- 9 130 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES main a member of the corporation after he had accepted service with a competing concern. The pleadings and answers in the civil suit were withdrawn from the court files, so that to-day there is nothing in the official archives but the most meagre record of the case. The next " ejecture " was that of John Scott, in 1 882. Like so many others before and since, it was the outgrowth of per- sonal difficulties with Andrew Carnegie. Mr. Scott obtained, however, a very high premium for the $50,000 which he had originally invested in the company ; as did also Gardiner McCand- less, who was induced to sell out the same year. Mr. McCand- less received $183,000 for his original investment of something like $42,000 in the convertible bonds. Thus did events justify the amazing foresight displayed by Andrew Carnegie when, only eight months after the opening of the Edgar Thomson works, he outlined, in his letter of April 1 3th, 1876, the principal changes in the personnel of the organi- zation which have just been described. It is an astonishing, almost an uncanny, exhibition of that clairvoyant faculty for which he has always been noted. In one aspect, too, it illus- trates the practical working of the Carnegie motto : " Concen- tration ! First honesty, then industry, then concentration." A further change was hinted at in Carnegie's letters for which the way was thus being gradually prepared. This was the combination of the Union Iron Mills, the Lucy Furnaces, and the Edgar Thomson Steel Works. The causes which brought about this consolidation are not very complex. On the one hand was the elder Carnegie's am- bition to make the works, which were now to bear his name, as impressive as possible. On the other hand, was the wish of his brother and Mr. Phipps to have a larger share in such a good thing as the Edgar Thomson Company. Forty odd per cent, in dividends is very attractive; and no doubt both Mr. Phipps and young Carnegie were by this time thoroughly sorry that they had sacrificed any part of their shares in the Edgar Thomson Com- THE PIG-IRON DISPUTE 131 pany. Accordingly a scheme of consolidation was made, and the manner in which it was carried out is told, with much interest- ing detail, in the following letters : PITTSBURGH, PA., Mch. 3ist. 1881. Wm. P. Shinn y Esq., Pittsburgh, Pa. DEAR SIR: In 1879, tne subject was broached, I do not re- member by whom, to consolidate the Lucy Furnace Co. and the Union Iron Mills with The Edgar Thomson Steel Co. Limited. We had so many disagreements and much trouble in fixing the price of pig-iron furnished by the Lucy Furnace Co. that I at once concluded that it was a good thing to do, and expressed myself in favor of the scheme provided it could be carried out on a fair basis. I was governed entirely to vote on your recom- mendation that the proposition of 55 for the E. T. S. Co. Limd. and 45 for the other property. Now that I have become familiar with the subject, and our experience of working the past year under the consolidation, I do not think the property put in should have [been] taken at over 30$. Having had the utmost confidence in your judgment, in such matters, I have a curiosity in learning what governed you in giving the advice you did, and thought it due you to give you an opportunity to explain how you made such a mistake. Yours truly JOHN SCOTT. PITTSBURGH, April 4th. 1881 John Scott Esq. Pittsburgh, Pa. DR. SIR: I have your letter of March 3ist, in which you refer to the basis of consolidation of interests of the Edgar Thomson Steel Co. Limited with the Lucy Furnace Co., Car- ] negie Brothers & Co and Carnegie & Co. on the basis of 55' per cent to the former and 45 per cent to the latter, and ask how I came to recommend what you characterize as " such a mistake." In reply, I will state the circumstances under which the pro- posed consolidation was first discussed, and what led me to as- sent to the basis named. In August 1879 I was invited to Mr. T. M. Carnegie's one evening, where I found Messrs. A. Carnegie, T. M. Carnegie and H. Phipps.' The subject of the consolidation was broached, and they 132 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES produced statements of cost and earnings of their properties as follows : Cost to July ist. Earnings, 1878. Six mos. 1879. Union Iron Mills $813,000.00 153,000.00 98,000.00 Lucy Furnaces 662,000.00 120,000.00 70,000.00 Coke Works, 4/5ths 100,000.00 20,000.00 16,000.00 Total 1,575,000.00 293,000.00 184,000.00 The cost of E. T. works, exclusive of the amount expended on furnaces and the earnings for the same period had been as follows : Cost of E. T. works July i, '79 $1,522,159.16 Profits, 1878 $401,800 " 6 mo. 1879 252,845 654,645.00 The costs and earnings of the two properties compared then as follows : Cost. Earnings 18 mo. E. T. S. Works $1,522,000 654,645 Carnegies' Works 1,575,000 477,000 But the E. T. S. Co. had furnaces A and B well under way, and expected to complete them by Jan. ist, 1880; and I claimed there should be added to the cost and earnings of E. T. S. Co. an amount equal to four-fifths the cost and earnings of Lucy Furnaces, or to cost say $528,000 and to earnings 200,000 This made them compare as follows : Cost. Earnings 18 mo. E. T. S. Works $2,050,000 $854,645 Carnegies' Works 1,575,000 477,000 the proportions of which were relatively Cost. Earnings 18 mos. E. T. S. Works of cost 56^ of earnings 64 per cent. Carnegies' Works " " 43 T 5 7 " " 36 " the average of which gave E. T. S. Works 60 Carnegies' 40 and I therefore proposed to accept 60 per cent for E. T. S. works. T. M. Carnegie demurred to this, alleging that the E. T. S. Works had been unusually profitable in past 18 months, while Plate VII, ANDREW CARNEGIE IN 1884 SERIOUS CHARGE 133 the furnace property had been very unusually depressed, pig-iron having sold at very low prices; and he insisted on 50 per cent for the Carnegie Works. A. Carnegie then pointed out that the E. T. S. Works had a debt of $186,000 on its land, which would have to be assumed by the joint interest, which if deducted would allow only $1,864,- ooo as cost of E. T. S. Works, or 54 per cent of the whole. Upon these considerations, and for the reason named by you, viz. to destroy the unceasing strife and bad feeling in the fixing of prices for metal bought of Lucy Furnace Co. in which I had been annoyed almost beyond endurance, I suggested 55 per cent as a compromise which was agreed to. It was not mentioned, nor was I aware, that the land on which the Lucy Furnaces and Union Iron Mills were built was not owned by them; and when Mr. Carnegie urged the mort- gage on the E. T. S. property in reduction of its value, he knew that a similar and much more important incumbrance was on the Union Iron Mills property, which I now understand was only leased, at a rental of $4,855 annually and liable to be greatly increased when present leases expire. This is equal to a mortgage of $ 80,900 Mortgage on Lucy Furnace property 160,000 Making a total incumbrance of $240,900 of which no mention was made at the time, of which I had not the slightest knowledge or suspicion, and which good faith re- quired should have been set forth. Had I known of these incumbrances I never would have agreed to consolidating on the basis of 55 and 45 per cent, nor would I have agreed to it at all, except to harmonize our inter- ests on the point which had caused so much difficulty and hard feeling. I see that in the new firm of C. B. & Co. Limd. they put in the respective properties E. T. S. property $2,500,000 62^ per ct. Carnegies' " 1,500,000 37^ " " 4,000,000 which is much nearer what the real proportionate value was a year ago. Yours truly WM. P. SHINN 134 QUARRELS AND EJECTURES The following interesting data appeared in a foot-note to Mr. Shinn's letter: 1880 Profits E. T. S. Works $1,625,000.00 Lucy $294,524.97 Coke 96,295.97 Union Mills 55,836.71 446,657.65 2,071,657.65 Chgd. Impts. Lucy Fur. Co 131,259.57 Union Mills 55,200.62 186,460.19 Leaves actual profits 260,197.46 The new firm referred to by Mr. Shinn was Carnegie Broth- ers & Co., Limited, which was organized on April ist, 1881, with a capital of $5,000,000. Of this, $4,000,000 was repre- sented by the Union Iron Mills, the Lucy Furnaces, certain unimportant coke interests of Andrew Carnegie, and the Edgar Thomson works. The rest was to be paid in cash. In this consolidation the interests were apportioned as follows : Andrew Carnegie .$2,737,977.95 Thos. M. Carnegie 878,096.58 Henry Phipps 878,096.58 David A. Stewart 175,318.78 John Scott 175,318.78 Gardiner McCandless 105,191.00 John W. Vandervort 50,000.00 The last named was Carnegie's companion on his trip around the world. He soon fell sick and withdrew from active business to California, where he died in 1897. The earning powers of the several properties are given in the foot-note to Mr. Shinn's letter quoted above. Their estimated values are given in the articles of incorporation as follows : Mortgage. Edgar Thomson works $2,385,000 594, Coal mines and Coke ovens at Unity 80,000 Ore lands at Patton 35,ooo Lucy Furnaces 750,000 160,000 Union Iron Mills 630,000 Four-fifths interest in Larimer Coke works 120,000 $4,000,000 INCOHERENT PLANS 135 The advantages of industrial consolidation had not, at this date, received any general recognition ; and, as we have seen, it was other considerations than increased efficiency and economy that prompted the first imperfect combination of the Carnegie properties. As illustrating how vague and incoherent were the plans of the group of men controlling the property at this time, it may be mentioned that two months after the consolidation described, the Lucy Furnaces were taken out of it and turned over to Wil- son, Walker & Co. During these eight weeks, however, their value was supposed to have increased from $750,000 to $1,000,- ooo ; and Messrs. John T. Wilson, James R. Wilson, and John Walker each subscribed for $142,857 of stock in the Lucy Furnace Company, Limited, with its million-dollar capital. An- drew Carnegie's share in it amounted to $420,627; the rest of the group holding interests from $58,539 in the cases of Thomas M. Carnegie and Henry Phipps, to $3,333 in the case of John Vandevort. CHAPTER IX A GLANCE AT PROCESSES AT this point a brief description of the processes of iron and steel making is necessary in order that readers unfamiliar with these arts may intel- ligently follow the course of this narra- tive. While it is not Blowing engines for blast-furnace. possible that Slich a rough outline can con- vey more than a hint of the wonderful transformations in- volved in modern methods of iron and steel manufacture, it may nevertheless help the reader to appreciate the nature of the great industrial evolution we are tracing. There is not a State in the American Union in which iron- stone is not found. Indeed, one may say there is no consider- able area of the earth's surface where it does not exist. The ancients undoubtedly knew how to mine and smelt it ; but, un- like other metals found in the tombs and habitations of vanished races, iron, unless protected from air and moisture, rapidly perishes through oxidation. In other words it rusts away. The oldest known piece of wrought-iron of any great size is found in the pillar of a temple at Delhi, India. It is sixteen inches in diameter and weighs about seventeen tons. No one knows when or how it was made. Many tribes of savages existing in our own time have been found in possession of primitive means of smelting. Speke and Livingstone describe the miniature blast-furnaces of the natives 136 EARLY FURNACE PRACTICE 137 of Central Africa; and it is not improbable that these simple operations were learned from the Egyptians, whose routes of trade are now known to have penetrated into what had become in our own time " Darkest Africa." It is not, however, with ancient practices that we are now concerned. It is rather with those mammoth operations which have given a special character to modern civilization and made it different from anything that has preceded it. The first operation is to mine the ore. This needs no de- scription for the present. The separation of the metal from the earthy substances usually associated with it is effected in the blast-furnace, where it is converted into pig-iron, the crudest form of manufactured iron. A modern blast-furnace is a giant structure shaped some- what like the chimney of a kerosene-oil lamp. The point of greatest diameter where the lamp chimney swells out to make room for the flame is called the bosh, frequently mentioned in this work. This furnace is filled with a mixture of iron ore, fuel, and lime; and a blast of air is forced through it from be- low. This draft at first was cold air ; but an ingenious English- man discovered, sixty or seventy years ago, that the ore was re- duced more quickly, and with a smaller consumption of fuel, if the blast was heated before being forced into the furnace. To the bewilderment of the scientists of that day this simple change resulted in doubling the iron product of a given quantity of fuel. Before that happy discovery the output of a blast-furnace had ranged from fifteen and a half tons a week, in 1788, to thirty- five tons in 1827; and at the former date the yearly product of the whole of England did not amount to as much as was recently produced in four months by a single American furnace. In these forty years the total annual iron production of England rose from 70,000 to 700,000 tons. In the forty years following the introduction of the hot blast the furnace product rose from thirty- five tons weekly to four hundred tons. This shows a wonderful development of the art of iron production ; but the lat- 138 A GLANCE AT PROCESSES ter figure was multiplied seven times by the Lucy furnace in the succeeding twelve years, and almost fifteen times by one of the furnaces built since at Duquesne. In the early blast-furnaces the gases freed in the process of reduction were allowed to escape in flames at the top of the stack, illuminating the country for miles around ; but towards the middle of the nineteenth century means were devised for utiliz- ing this vast volume of flame for the purpose of raising steam and heating the blast. For the latter purpose it was led from the throat of the furnace into ovens containing iron pipes through which the blast was blown. These iron pipes limited the tem- perature of the blast to that of their own melting-point. Pres- ently the pipes were displaced by enor- mous stoves contain- ing fire-brick, against which the flames are now directed. After the fire - brick has been brought to a great heat, the gas is turned into a second stove, to perform the same service there; while the air-blast is admitted to the first stove, where it is raised to a very high temperature 1200 to 1600 Fahrenheit. So in alterna- tion the stoves are thus heated, and the blast passed through them one after the other, on the regenerative principle invented by Dr. Siemens. To the higher degree of temperature thus secured is due a large part of the increased output of the Lucy and Isabella furnaces during their long contest. In the first photograph of the former made in 1873 the stack seems to stand alone, because the hot-blast stoves were small at this date. In the second illustration the stack can hardly be seen for the stoves, Lucy furnaces, showing hot-blast stoves. A CHILLED STACK 139 which, indeed, to the untrained onlooker, seem the most impor- tant part of the plant. At the time the Lucy furnace was built the lines of blast- furnaces were not the graceful curves of the lamp chimney that Drawing the finished coke. The method of charging the raw coal is also seen. It is dropped from the donkey-car through an opening in the top of the oven. has been used to illustrate them. They were almost straight lines ; and the bosh formed an angle. A few months after the Lucy had been started, the mass inside got chilled, so that the metal stopped running down. The furnace was therefore emp- 140 A GLANCE AT PROCESSES tied ; and to the surprise of everybody connected with it, the wooden lining that had been built to protect the inside from the first loads of ore, etc., which were poured into it, was found in some places almost intact. Of course it ought to have been burnt up; but in- stead of that large parts remained and were hardly charred. This set some men thinking; and the outcome of their cogitations was the idea that the shape of the furnace was all wrong. It was evident that in this furnace the zone of Casting-pit of blast-furnace, where the metal is made into "pigs." fusion did not ex- tend beyond the narrow range of the central funnel, and that, consequently, the benefit of its large interior capacity was mainly lost. Builders therefore gradually changed the shape of furnaces, cutting out all angles, lengthening the curves, and increasing the size of the hearth. In 1872 the Lucy furnace was 75 feet high, 20 feet in diameter at the bosh, and 9 feet wide at the hearth. The product was fifty to sixty tons a day. In 1902 the same furnace was 90 feet high with the same diameter of bosh as formerly, and I2j4 feet wide at the hearth. The product has been as high as 500 tons a day and 1 2,000 tons a month ; and for every man employed the average product of pig-iron is now two tons a day, as against one ton thirty years ago. The fuel first used in blast-furnaces was charcoal ; but the threatened depletion of the forests of Britain caused the substi- tution of pit-coal. As early as 1773 charred coal or coke was tried in England ; but its use did not become general until well PROCESS OF COKING 141 into the last century. In America charcoal was largely used long after it was found that anthracite, which is a natural coke, was suitable for smelting. As related elsewhere in this work the use of coke or "cake " coal did not become general until the early seventies. It was the proximity of the Connellsville beds of bituminous coal which is singularly free from sulphur and other impurities that gave Pittsburg its leadership in the iron industry of America. The purpose of changing this coal into coke is to rid it of the sulphur and phosphorus which is found in greater or less quantities in all soft coals. There is a saying among iron-workers that these elements are to iron what the devil is to religion. As a matter of fact they are worse ; for there are some good work- able religions that could not get along without the devil, but there is no good workable iron with sulphur and phosphorus in it. The process of coking consists of baking the coal in hot ovens, so that, to continue the theological simile, the diabolic parts are driven off as flaming gas from the top of the oven. These flaming ovens give a wild and picturesque aspect to the coking country as one passes through it by night. Presently the coal fuses into a cake, which is cooked for forty to sixty hours, until hardly anything but carbon remains. This cake is then drenched with water, and pulled out of the oven by a door which up to this time has been sealed. The sudden cool- ing of the mass splinters it into the form so familiar to all who travel on the railroads. In the best furnace practice seventeen or eighteen hundred pounds of coke are now used to smelt one ton of pig-iron. In the Lucy furnace the amount first used was about double that amount. The lime which accompanies the ore and coke into the blast- furnace produces certain chemical changes which are too com- plicated for description here. It also serves as a flux to carry away the earthy matters with which the iron is associated in its mineral form. These residues constitute the slagj or scum of the liquid iron. 142 A GLANCE AT PROCESSES The furnace is tapped about every four hours ; and the molten iron runs, a limpid, glowing stream, into channels and moulds that have been prepared for it, where it cools and hard- ens into shapes which have suggested the name "pig." Hence pig-iron. The channel leading to the pigs is called the "sow, " and as they are seen lying together the simile is obvious. In modern practice the iron is usually poured into enormous ladles, which are drawn by locomo- tives to the convert- ers, where it is made into Bessemer steel. Before following a train of these la- dles to the convert- ing house, it is worth while to see what be- comes of the pigs of Train of ladles. iron as SOOn as the 7 are cold enough to be taken out of their moulds. In former days they were usually converted into wrought-iron in such places as the Union mills. Placed in a puddling-furnace an oven with a concave floor with a certain amount of ore for " fettling," they were reduced to liquid form and boiled and stirred about until most of the impurities were driven off. When the bubbling mass thickened and assumed a pasty consistency, the puddler passed a long bar through a small opening in the furnace door, and rolled the paste into a ball. This ball was then withdrawn and carried, dripping with liquid fire, to a queer arrangement of big wheels which crushed and rolled the ball over and over, squeezing out all sorts of useless stuff and further solidifying the mass. This machine has been mentioned in another chapter as the squeezer. The ball was then re-heated, and passed under hammers and through rollers; and the kneading it thus repeatedly underwent gave it THE JONES MIXER 143 the fibrous quality of wrought-iron. When it had been finished into bars it was ready for the market. This was the material of which Kloman made his famous axles. The Bessemer process of steel-making has displaced the art of puddling, except for a few special purposes. Steel rusts more readily than iron; and for this reason chains for cables are still made of puddled-iron. Cast-iron is pig-iron mixed with ore and scrap, melted in a cupola and then cast into moulds of the shapes required. When cold it is drilled, planed, and finished into the heavy parts of machinery where great resistance is called for. When fractured, cast-iron is seen to have a granulated form, like dirty sugar ; whereas wrought-iron has a fibrous quality that makes it ductile and tough. And now it is necessary to return to the train of ladles be- fore the contents cool. Covered with coke dust to retain the heat, the liquid pig metal can be transported a dozen miles to a converter; and this is sometimes done. At every curve and bump of the locomotive, some of the metal slops over the edge of the ladle, and breaks into a galaxy of shooting stars. Pres- ently the train arrives alongside the Jones mixer, a huge iron chest lined with refractory bricks, and capable of holding fifty to two hundred and fifty tons of liquid pig metal. It is hung on trunnions, so that it may be swung to and fro like a cradle ; for here the contents of many ladles are mixed to equalize the variations of both chemical composition and temperature of the furnace product. Before the invention of the mixer, the pig- iron had to be re-melted in a cupola before it could be converted into steel. One by one the ladles are emptied into the mixer, the liquid flowing clean and creamy, with fairy lights dancing over its surface. Whenever a few drops spill to the ground they rebound in thousands of tiny points of fire, exploding with the noise of a miniature fusillade. A boy of thirteen or four- teen, his imp-like face black with soot, stands near the flaming funnel of the mixer, shouting shrill directions to his fellow 144 A GLANCE AT PROCESSES demon, who, somewhere concealed among the dark shadows of the wheels and chains aloft, reverses the five-ton ladles with the ease of a society woman emptying her cup of tea. At night the scene is indescribably wild and beautiful. The flashing fire- works, the terrific gusts of heat, the gaping, glowing mouth of the giant chest, the quivering light from the liquid iron, the roar of a near-by converter, the weird figure of the child and the pipings of his shrill voice, the smoke and fumes and confusion, combine to produce an effect on the mind that no words can translate. Dante in his most hellish conception never ap- proached such a reality. The most eloquent preacher that ever described the condition of the damned was as a babbling brook in a soft summer landscape compared with this. And who shall tell of what goes on in the giant chest where two hundred and fifty tons of liquid iron have just been poured, to be rocked to and fro, a seething, swirling, bubbling mass ? In one aspect this is the cradle of civilization. Here, in the Jones mixer, goes on the first of the processes by which is made the steel of locomotives, rails, and ships that link race to race throughout the world ; of the engines of mines and facto- ries ; of the machines of thousands of mills ; of the reapers and harvesters of farms ; of the beams and angles and bars of which modern cities are largely built. Here rocking in this huge box are the springs of chronometers that keep pace with the prog- ress of the stars; the needles that point the manner's way; the tubes through which the astronomer watches the birth of worlds ; the disks that talk through a thousand "miles of space ; and most of the other miracles that make the sum of modern civilization. To the intelligent onlooker there is as much poetry in Jones' box as there was in Pandora's ; and even this does not contain all the wonders of the beautiful transformations which have given Pittsburg a yellow crown of light. From the mixer the molten iron, now uniform in composi- tion, is transferred to the converter. Samples have been quickly cooled and analyzed, so as to afford a guide to future operations, BRILLIANT PYROTECHNICS 145 that the final product may have just the qualities of resistance or ductility required of it. With the same spluttering and scin- tillations as before, the liquid is poured through the lower open- ing of the mixer into fresh ladles, which in turn are emptied into an egg-shaped vessel. This is the Bessemer converter, the most beautiful and perfect piece of mechanism ever devised by the human mind. Itself of enormous proportions and weight, it is so delicately poised that when filled with ten or fifteen tons of liquid iron, it can be moved at the touch of a finger. The metal is poured into the vessel while suspended in a horizontal position. A blast of cold air is then forced through a number of holes in its lower end, and simultaneously the great oval mass becomes erect. Sir Henry Bessemer has himself elo- quently depicted the beauty of the transformation which now takes place : " The powerful jets of air spring upward through the fluid mass of metal. The air expanding in volume divides itself into globules, or bursts violently upward, carrying with it some hun- dredweight of fluid metal which again falls into the boiling mass below. Every part of the apparatus trembles under the violent agitation thus produced ; a roaring flame rushes from the mouth of the vessel, and as the process advances it changes its violet color to orange, and finally to a voluminous pure white flame. The sparks, which at first were large like those of ordinary foundry iron, change into small hissing points, and these gradu- ally give way to soft floating specks of bluish light, as the state of malleable iron is approached. During the process the heat has rapidly risen from the comparatively low temperature of melted pig-iron to one vastly greater than the highest known welding heats ; the iron becomes perfectly fluid, and even rises so much above the melting-point as to admit of its being poured from the converter into a founder's ladle, and from thence to be transferred to several successive moulds." The chemical changes accompanying this gorgeous display are equally beautiful. The liquid pig metal contains a percent- age of manganese, silicon, and carbon. If we could conceive of these elements as endowed with human emotion, we might 10 146 A GLANCE AT PROCESSES say that every particle is in love with some atom of oxygen. The converting-vessel is the meeting place of the lovers and the scene of their marriage. With noisy celebration the union of the little globules of air and the tiny atoms takes place, and emerging from the lip of the converter in sparkling radi- ance the happy pairs soar away to spend their short lives to- gether. Scientists stolidly call this marriage " chemical affinity. " Goethe named the similar union of human Filling Ingot-moulds with molten steel. souls elective affin- ity. " The comparison suggested is not so fanciful as it seems. Every atom of every element in the twelve-ton charge now roar- ing and flaming before us will eventually find and unite with the atom of oxygen for which it has an affinity chemical or elective it matters not. It may be this moment or the next, in the violent ebullition of the Bessemer converter; it may be thousands of years hence in the beam of a sky-scraper; but sooner or later, every atom of iron as well as every atom of silicon and carbon will find its mate in the oxygen of the air, and so separate itself from its fellows. This is a predestination of matter not found in theologies. When the flame at the lip of the converter becomes white it is a sign that the manganese, silicon, and carbon have united with the oxygen blown through the mass and escaped into the air. Now the iron itself is following the same course, and that means waste. So the youth, who has been watching the con- flagration through colored goggles from a distant platform, touches a lever; and the huge vessel slowly bends forward so Plate VIII, Courtesy of S. S. McClure. Co. Copyright by the S. S. McClure Co. BESSEMER CONVERTER IN OPERATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE BESSEMER PROCESS as to let the metal flow into the body of the converter, and un- cover the air-holes beneath. With a mighty rush the blast now sweeps along the surface of the metal, detaching a million minor particles of glowing matter and sending a shower of sparks across the converting-pit. It is the brilliant finale of the gor- geous display. To replace a part of the lost carbon, a few shovelfuls of spiegeleisen or ferro-manganese are thrown into the mass, which is then poured into moulds, to solidify into ingots of steel. When taken out of the moulds the steel is passed under heavy rollers to give it the shapes needed for its intended use as rails, beams, or plates, as well as to knead it into that fibrous texture which we saw resulted from similar action in the making of wrought-iron. The first rolling thus makes blooms ; and these cut into lengths make billets, which again are shaped into a hundred and one things as needed. , Such in brief, and in rough outline, is the process of Bessemer steel manufacture. Henry Bessemer, who was knighted in recognition of his beautiful invention, took out his first patent in 1856. Ten years later the world's output of Bessemer steel amounted to about 100,000 tons. By 1870 it reached 300,000 tons. In the first year of the present century it had attained a total of 19,000,000 tons, of which nearly 9,000,000 tons were pro- duced in the United States. Since 1886, however, a newer method of steel-making has grown with even greater rapidity. This is known as the open- steel ingot about to enter the rolls. 148 A GLANCE AT PROCESSES hearth basic process. It is probable that this will soon displace the beautiful and simple invention of Sir Henry Bessemer, just as the latter displaced puddling. Huge ingot being forged for armor-plate under the i 2 ,ooo-ton hydraulic press at Homestead. The advantage which the basic open-hearth possesses over the Bessemer converter is that it enables the steel- maker to use ores high in phosphorus. It also permits the easy working- over of scrap, spoiled ends of billets and rails, and old stuff of THE BASIC OPEN-HEARTH 149 all kinds. At Homestead are two large basic furnaces from which the entire top can be removed ; and parts of old machines weighing many tons are lifted bodily into them for re-conver- sion. Moreover, the capacity of the largest Bessemer converter is about fifteen tons. In the basic furnace fifty tons are often made at once ; and the product of several hearths can be drawn at the same moment to make an ingot of a hundred and fifty tons if desired. This has been done at Homestead. The basic open-hearth is simply a huge and improved pud- dling-furnace. A bath of pig metal is used in which to dissolve scrap of all kinds with a mixture of ore. The charge and lin- ing of the furnace are alkaline, so as to convert the acids of phosphorus into a neutral base, which, with other so-called impurities, floats on the metal as slag as it is drawn off. The process has none of the picturesque aspects of the Bessemer con- verter. The most interesting thing about it to a layman is to see, through colored glasses, how the steel boils and bubbles as if it were so much milk. The bigness of it its fifty-ton ladles swinging in space, its hundred-ton ingots under a twelve- thousand-ton press as seen at Homestead makes it impressive ; but the gentle boiling of steel for hours without any fireworks or poetry, in a huge shed as empty of workmen as a church on week-days, is not a very interesting sight. Indeed, it would seem as if all that is spectacular will have been lost in the manufacture of steel with the passing of the Jones mixer and the Bessemer converter. To the chemist, however, the basic process is full of interest; but this short description is not designed for him. In 1886 the product of this process was 218,973 tons in America and in England, 694,150 tons. In 1902 it approximated five and a half million tons in America, and in England three and a half million tons. The present rate of increase in the United States is over a hundred thou- sand tons a month. CHAPTER X THE RISE AND GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD AMITY HOMESTEAD was the name given by John Mc- Clure four generations ago to a quaint country seat which he built in the bend of the Monongahela a mile or so be- low Braddock's crossing, and ten miles from Pittsburg. He is said to have been a fox-hunting Presbyterian, with all the rigorous rectitude, blunt virtues, and frank hospitality which this implies. Thus planting the traditions of the old home in a new environment, he passed the picturesque place on to his son John, and through him to his grandson Aldiel. In 1872 the latter sold one hundred and thirteen acres to a banking and in- surance company ; and a town was forthwith laid out and called Homestead. The first sale of lots was made to all the old-time accompaniments of a brass band and free junketing; and the Pittsburg, Virginia and Charleston Railroad building across the empty lots the following year, the town took a good start and bade fair soon to grow as big as the older places in the region. But the panic of 1873 came and gave it a set-back from which it was long in recovering. In 1879 there were less than six hundred inhabitants in the place. On October 2 1 st of that year, however, an event occurred of first importance in the history of Homestead. This was the in- corporation of the Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Company, Limited, with a capital of $250,000. The founders of this company were all connected with the firms which had been supplied with 150 KLOMAN STARTS RIVAL WORKS 151 merchant steel for a time by the Edgar Thomson Company and, as already related, had been suddenly cut off from supplies through the refusal of that firm to fill orders for billets. Their subscriptions were as follows : Wm. G. Park, of Park Bros. & Co 5 shares, $50,000 Curtis G. & C. Curtis Hussey, of Hussey, Wells & Co. 5 50,000 Wm. H. Singer, of Singer, Nimick & Co 5 50,000 Reuben Miller, of the Crescent Steel Works 4 40,000 Wm. Clark, of the Solar Iron and Steel Works 4 40,000 Andrew Kloman, of the Superior Mill, Allegheny 2 20,000 The Singer concern made a specialty of tool cast-steel, pa- tent rolled saw-plates, spring and plow steel, axles, tires, etc. The Hussey firm made refined cast- steel for edge tools, homo- geneous plates for locomotives, boilers, and fire-boxes, and cast- steel forgings for crank-pins, car-axles, etc. Park Brothers were the owners of the Black Diamond Steel Works, and were in a somewhat similar line ; while Kloman had leased the Supe- rior Mill in Allegheny and had recommenced the manufacture of eye-bars and structural material. He was also rolling light rails. Kloman's lease ran out in 1879; and he decided to build a mill of his own. He bought a small tract of land adjoining the City Farm at Homestead, and commenced the erection of a building 684 feet long by 85 wide ; to contain a twenty-one inch rail-mill, two Universal mills, a sixteen- inch bar-train, and a muck-train. At the same time the Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Company bought some forty of fifty acres of land adjoining Kloman's, and commenced the erection of a converting works and blooming-mill. The two concerns were designed to work together, Kloman taking the surplus product of the Bessemer Steel Company and working it up into structural shapes. One Universal mill and four steam-hammers were to be constantly run on the Kloman patent solid eye-bars; and he gauged the capacity of his plant at 50,000 tons of steel rails and 30,000 tons of structural material annually. While building his own mill Kloman supervised the erec- 152 GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD tion of the adjoining converting works; and his skill and expe- rience, joined to those of Macintosh & Hemphill, who had the contract for the engines, and later became stockholders in the enterprise, proved of inestimable value to his associates. The result was unsurpassed not only in the completeness and efficiency of the works, but in the rapidity of their construction. While the Edgar Thomson plant was over three years in build- ing a delay not entirely due to the panic the Homestead works were put in operation fifteen months after the land was bought. The first steel was made on March iQth, 1881, and the first rail on August Qth of the same year. Before the mill was quite completed, however, Kloman died. After a life of patient and fruitful endeavor, of numberless vic- tories in the realm of invention, of successes ever ripening into fortune but always falling at the feet of others, the pathos of his career reached its culmination when hope was brightest. From the very conception of the great industry whose growth we are tracing, until the moment of his death, Andrew Klo- man's influence persisted without a break. He founded the business ; built the Twenty-ninth Street mill; rebuilt and made successful the Thirty-third Street mill. He was prominent in the Lucy Furnace enterprise ; and he worked hard for the Edgar Thomson works. Finally the great Homestead plant was of his founding; and even to-day some of the machines he built there are running in testimony to his thoroughness. * The Pittsburg Bessemer Company at once purchased Klo- man's unfinished mill, and carried out the contracts for rails that he had made. By September, 1881, they were turning out 200 tons of rails a day and had orders booked for 15,000 tons at profitable prices. The Carnegies looked on with surprise " In broad charity, in great patience, in uncomplaining endurance of wrongs^ in conscientious veracity and uprightness of integrity, in calmness and serenity of manner, we recognize the higher type of Christian manhood." From the resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Com- pany, on the death of Andrew Kloman, ARBITRARY MANAGEMENT 153 and alarm. Up to this time they had been the only makers of rails in the Pittsburg district. Here was competition at their very door. Councils of war were held once more on Brad- dock's Field ; for it looked as if the prosperity which had hung so lovingly over the Edgar Thomson works had now crossed the river and alighted upon the rival enterprise at Homestead. Had the wisdom which governed the designing and construc- tion of the works been maintained in their management, it is likely that their initial prosperity would have continued until they had surpassed their great rivals at Braddock. That the pos- sibilities of a phenomenal success were there was brilliantly 3S*6W-^Lc. y^ X ^'^~ ' f e e fit'/ ifJ2$&L.& Assessment Jfo K^^,bem^i.per cent on Shares Stock of The Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co., Limited An assessment notice. demonstrated a few years later under other leaders. But, un- fortunately, there was no Captain Jones to weld into unity the conflicting racial elements with which the new works were rilled. The rail-mill was controlled by the Welsh ; and if a desirable post became vacant, it was not filled by the next man, but by some newly imported friend of the Welsh foreman. The Irish were supreme in the converting works ; and in the blooming- mill yet a third nationality was in power. Over all was an un- reasonable and arbitrary management ever tending to open con- flict with the workmen. In a few months this conflict came, and set up dissensions which ultimately destroyed the corpora- tion. William Clark, who was put in charge of the works, was a bitter opponent of labor-unions ; and before going to Homestead he had incurred the dislike of the men for his prowess as a " strike-breaker," of which he was rather proud. It was not long before the trouble he was ever looking for came. One day 154 GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD after the furnaces had all been charged with ingots, the men came to him in a body and made some demand which he had previously refused. As a stoppage would have involved the firm in a great loss, the workmen's requirements were met, but with mental reservations on the part of Clark. At the end of the year he issued an order requiring employees to sign an agreement renouncing their right to join labor-unions, and re- quiring union men to leave their organizations at once. The alternative presented was dismissal from the company's service. Most of the men were members of the Amalgamated Associa- tion of Iron and Steel Workers; and on the 1st of January, 1882, these refused to sign the agreement, and were locked out. After the works had been idle a week, the company gave notice that the men could not return to work, even if they signed the agreement, unless they would accept a reduction of wages. This intensified the bitterness of the workmen ; and the Amalgamated Association took cognizance of the dispute. At this time the Amalgamated Association was the most powerful labor organization in existence, having a membership of 70,000, and controlling every department of the iron and steel industry. Except in a few small works, there was not a wheel turning nor a fire burning from Maine to Texas that was not cared for by an Association man. From the newly established furnaces in Colorado to the oldest rolling-mill in the Keystone State the authority of the Amalgamated Association was almost supreme; and, generally speaking, its power at this date was beneficently and properly exercised. Its origin may be briefly outlined. In 1858 some men in the Pittsburg iron-mills attempted the formation of a society for the protection of working men against unreasonable exactions of employers, and for the discus- sion and reform of long-standing grievances. Inasmuch as the new movement was regarded by employers with suspicion, the workmen were obliged to conduct their deliberations with se- crecy; and thus disadvantaged the movement failed. A couple FIRST HOMESTEAD STRIKE 155 of years later the effort was renewed, and the United Sons of Vulcan was established by the puddlers, heaters, rollers, and roughers. The new organization won recognition from employ- ers; and in February, 1865, it justified itself by securing the first sliding scale of wages. Following the example of the Sons of Vulcan came other labor organizations, until every de- partment of iron and steel working was included in the move- ment. After the long strike of 1874 the obvious advantages of consolidating these different bodies led to the formation, in August, 1 876, of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers of the United States, with Mr. Joseph Bishop as presi- dent. In January, 1880, Mr. John Jarrett took Mr. Bishop's place ; and the contest at Homestead now came under his direc- tion. Mr. Jarrett at once sought an interview with the managers of the company; and while his right to meddle in the dispute was not questioned, he was put off from day to day with vari- ous excuses, and was admitted to a conference only after the gravity of the situation had been increased by mutual charges and recriminations in the newspapers. Nothing came of the conference ; and the labor leaders, seeing in the attitude of the owners of the Homestead mill a disposition to. attack the Amal- gamated Association throughout the Pittsburg district, threat- ened to call out the men from every other mill in which these owners were interested. " If this condition of affairs continues at Homestead," said Mr. Jarrett, "the stockholders in the Homestead works who have mills in Pittsburg may have to fight the association in their own mills. We shall not much longer permit several firms to conveniently fight us in this concentrated shape." Response was promptly made to this threat by the eviction of the striking workmen from the homes they had rented from the company. The labor leaders thereupon embodied their threat in a formal resolution, and a date was fixed for the sym- pathetic strike. Thoroughly alarmed the company now offered to withdraw 156 GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD the objectionable agreement; substituting one requiring the men to give three days' notice of an intention to stop work, and not more than three men to give such notice at one time. This might have been satisfactory to the men ; but they refused to accept the reduced scale of wages. In vain the company urged that the improved machinery at their command made the work easier and the output greater than at similar works. The men had won one concession and were determined not to yield a point so important as that which remained. So both sides made ready in the newspapers for a general strike in all the works belonging to the owners of Homestead, to begin on the nth of March; and the labor leaders took the opportunity of including in their resolution three other Pittsburg mills in which disputes of various kinds had long been pending. This meant the calling out of about 6,000 men, with dangerous pos- sibilities of extensions ; and the manufacturers of Pittsburg were not unnaturally alarmed at the prospect. It is interesting in the light afforded by a hundred sympa- thetic strikes since, to read the nai've expressions of opinion published at that time by the Homestead managers. Mr. Singer " could not see how the Amalgamated Association could order a strike in mills where there was no trouble existing between employers and employees ; " and similar views were voiced by others who took the employers' side of the dispute. So the thing went on, each side daily publishing columns of protests, accusations, and threatenings, until it seemed as though all the iron works in Pittsburg would be involved in the struggle. The days of grace accorded to the Homestead people thus passed by, the dispute ever waxing fiercer in the newspapers until the very eve of the threatened sympathetic strike, when the company capitulated. On the iith of March the first Homestead strike was reported settled ; and men of all classes throughout the Pittsburg district read their papers that morning with relief and thanksgiving. It had lasted ten weeks. The joy was short-lived, however. The next day misunder- THE TROUBLE SPREADS 157 standings arose between Mr. Clark and the Amalgamated Asso- ciation concerning the force and scope of a verbal agreement made at the time of the supposed settlement; and the strike was resumed with greater bitterness than ever. At Homestead there was great excitement, resulting in a pitched battle be- tween deputy sheriffs and strikers, in outrages on " scabs," and even in murder. Demands were made for the state militia by the company, and requests for fresh conferences by the labor leaders. The newspaper war was renewed ; and Clark threat- ened to close the works indefinitely. Appeal was made by out- side interests to the other owners, who, publicly vowing they were powerless, nevertheless stepped between Clark and the strikers and insisted upon a settlement. For a time the con- test was transferred to the council-chambers of the owners and there waged with hardly less bitterness than before. Indeed, the differences which now arose were mainly responsible for the final disruption of the company. Some degree of harmony was at length reached; and on March 2Oth the newspapers announced that the strike was " set- tled once more. " The terms of the peace were so worded as to give it the aspect of a compromise. Practically it was a vic- tory for the men. Clark promptly sent in his resignation, and it was as promptly accepted. Encouraged by its success, the Amalgamated Association a few weeks later demanded a general advance of five to fifteen per cent, in the wages of all iron and steel workers throughout the country. A thunderbolt out of a clear sky, to which this demand was compared, could not have excited greater surprise and consternation. Anathematizing the Homestead works and all its managers, the iron manufacturers of the country prepared for the greatest contest with labor that had ever been seen. June ist, 1882, was the day fixed by the association for the be- ginning of this struggle ; and on that day the Carnegies and two of the firms connected with the Homestead works, who by this time had come to hold the Amalgamated Association in I S 8 GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD awe, agreed to the latter's demands. In all other mills where union labor was employed, work was suspended in Pittsburg, Wheeling, Cleveland, Cincinnati, St. Louis, Springfield, Chi- cago, and other places. The iron industry of the country was paralyzed in a day; and for nearly four months the struggle thus inaugurated continued, marked with wonderful endurance on the part of the men and great determination on the part of the manufacturers. For a while the works at Homestead managed to struggle along, under the terms of the settlement, with a force composed partly of union and partly of non- union men ; but the disor- ganization of the iron and steel trade was more than it could cope with, and, on August 2 ist, the works were shut down for lack of orders, as the manage- ment frankly stated. On September 2ist the general strike ended in the complete discomfiture of the men, who for over a month had been dropping from the Amalgamated Association, starved into submission. The struggle had cost millions and benefited nobody. On the very next day a fresh strike occurred at Homestead, where an effort had been made, a couple of weeks before, to start up again. The cause was a trifling incident growing out of the previous dispute. The men objected to the presence of a " scab " who, during the troubles, had shot one of them in self-defence ; and to even things up the management also ex- pelled the workman who had been thus wounded. The new trouble did not last long; but it served to increase "Shot one of them in self-defence." PURCHASE OF THE STEEL WORKS 159 the discontent of the stockholders of the concern, whose greater interests in their respective mills were thus repeatedly jeopar- dized ; and their dissensions became acute. About this time, too, the price of steel was rapidly falling; and, alarmed by the imminent call for more capital, some of the Homestead stock- holders hastened to get out of the company. One of them hav- j ing secured an option on the shares of some of his associates, went to the Carnegies and offered them the control thus acquired. The offer was promptly accepted. Although trade was now very bad and daily growing worse, the Edgar Thomson works in the past had been inconveniently drawn upon for supplies of steel by the Hartman Steel Company at Beaver Falls, and for billets by the Union Iron Mills. The Keystone Bridge Works were also using increasingly large quantities of steel ; and the Carnegie people were prompt to embrace the opportunity offered them of acquiring possession on easy terms of a plant which would at once relieve the pressure from the Edgar Thomson works and remove from their immediate neighborhood a danger- ous rival. Accordingly in October, 1883, the Homestead mills became . the property of the Carnegie group. The price paid was the cost of the plant, with a reasonable allowance for increased land values. Little cash was paid; and the notes given in pay- ment were subsequently liquidated out of the profits of the mills. The Carnegies, with a view of holding for themselves the markets created by the old stockholders, offered the latter the privilege of remaining in the enterprise; but with one unimpor- tant exception they declined the offer, and, taking their little checks and notes, went out of the enterprise with grateful hearts. The interest of the one who remained was eventually sold for about eight millions. It is illustrative of the unfailing luck of the Carnegies that the Homestead works, thus acquired when the steel trade was 1 6o GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD suffering an unparalleled depression, should pay their cost within two years. Few of the steel works of the country were working up to their full capacity at the end of 1883, and many of them were closed. At $35 a ton, none but the best-equipped mills could make rails without loss. Even at this price there were few orders to be had; and six of the nine Western mills were shut down. At the beginning of December the Edgar Thomson had only enough work in sight to last a few days and one con- tingent order of 8,000 tons of rails, not to be rolled until the order had been confirmed. The Homestead works had been put on bil- lets for the Union Iron Mills, and had only enough work in sight to keep running till the middle of Janu- ary. Wilson, Walker & Co. stopped work on Decem- ber 5th for lack of orders. The Joliet mill had just shut down ; and the old Chicago mill "Went out of the enterprise with grateful hearts." had long before stopped running for like reasons. But the Carnegie partners had faith in the future, and still greater confidence in the genius of the men who had made their other enterprises successful ; and so, utilizing these dull times for repairs and changes, and profiting by low prices of labor and material for extensions, they struggled through the period of GROWTH OF THE PLANT 161 depression and were ready for the harvest of prosperity when it came. The conversion of the Homestead works to the production of steel specialties is a very striking indication of the new uses to which steel was then being put. As we have seen, the works apart from Kloman's were projected for the manufacture of steel ingots and billets to be used by the crucible steel-makers of Pittsburg. They were not now used for their original pur- pose, but for the manufacture of steel specialties which were fast taking the place of iron. Steel bridges were now used to replace those of wood; and the low price of Bessemer beams and other structural shapes gave an impulse to their use in architecture which, in a few years, wrought the revolution cul- minating in the sky-scraper. There were thus developed new markets which soon brought back prosperity to the trade ; and the temporary depression had but served to benefit the far- sighted manufacturer who knew enough to utilize the period of low prices to add to the capacity of his works. At the time of its purchase the Homestead mill was already one of the best-equipped plants of its size in the country; but during the next few years important additions were made to it which put it at the head of the steel works of the world. On October, 1885, a new bar and angle mill was constructed, giving employment to four hundred men ; and by the middle of July, 1886, the converting works, under the skilful management of Mr. Julian Kennedy, were turning out six hundred tons of Bessemer steel a day. In the month of March, 1887, the two four-ton converters produced the unexampled total of 19,572 tons of ingots, and further broke the record with an output of 915 tons in one day. During their most active period of growth Mr. Julian Ken- nedy was superintendent of the works ; and their success was in no small degree due to his exceptional engineering skill. Just as a new era in blast-furnace construction and product was inaugurated under his management at the Edgar Thomson works ii MR. P HIP PS' PROGRESSIVENESS 163 in the early '8os, so now was initiated a revolution in rolling- mill practice. The slabbing-mill, already mentioned as the giant descendant of the little Zimmer mill at Kloman's, was erected by him, as was also the II 9-inch plate-mill, the largest machine of its kind that up to that time had been built. A slight modification in the arrangement of the slabbing-mill a machine that cost nearly a million fitted it for the rolling of armor-plate and doubled its usefulness. Mr. Kennedy invented Ninety-ton steel ingot at Homestead. ingenious labor-saving devices by which massive shapes of red- hot steel were tossed lightly about at the will of a single oper- ator, and excited the wonder, not only of chance visitors, but of trained engineers who travelled half round the world to see them. By the insistent progressiveness of Mr. Phipps the first basic open-hearth furnace in America was erected by Mr. Ken- nedy at Homestead, and was so successful that others followed in quick succession. To this early entry into a new field and 1 64 GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD to persistent cultivation of it is due the supremacy which the Homestead plant has won over the steel works of the world. This broad statement is verified by a comparison. In 1886, when the first open-hearth plant was built at Homestead, the production of steel by this process was only a little over 200,000 tons in the whole of the United States. Last year (1902) the Homestead works alone produced over 1,500,000 tons of open- hearth steel. This is about twenty-five per cent, of the total output of the country, although there are seventy-seven other works in America making open-hearth steel. Added to the product of the Bessemer process this gives a total of 1,889,000 tons of steel made at Homestead last year. These results are in a large measure due to the use of natu- /ral gas in the open-hearth furnaces. The chance which placed the Carnegie enterprises in the natural-gas region is to be credited with much of their exceptional success; and in the manufacture of open-hearth steel this fortuitous factor has been of first importance. The heating power of natural gas is far greater than that of the ordinary " converter gas " used else- where, thus making the operation of fifty-ton furnaces an easy matter; while its cost to the Carnegies does not exceed five cents a thousand feet, thanks to the enlightened policy of Mr. 1 Frick, who, in spite of much opposition, secured large areas of gas territory for his firm. It is to this single fact that much of the astonishing growth of the business, described later, is due. It is at Homestead that wonders are performed as amazing as those of the Arabian Nights. Here machines endowed with the strength of a hundred giants move obedient to a touch, opening furnace doors and lifting out of the glowing flames enormous slabs of white-hot steel, much as a child would pick up a match-box from the table. Two of these monsters, appro- priately named by the men " Leviathan and Behemoth," seem gifted with intelligence. Each is attended by a little trolley- car that runs busily to and fro, its movements controlled by the more sluggish monster. This little attendant may be at one WONDER-WORKING MACHINES 165 end of the long shed and the Leviathan at the other; but no sooner does it seem to see its giant master open a furnace door and put in his great hand for a fresh lump of hot steel, than it runs back like a terrier to its owner and arrives just as the huge fist is withdrawn with a glowing slab. This the Leviathan gen- tly places on its attendant's back ; and, to the admiration of all beholders, the little thing trots gayly off with it to the end of the building. Even then the wonder is not ended; for the little fellow gives a shake to his back, and the glittering mass, The Leviathan and its attendant. twice as big as a Saratoga trunk, slides onto a platform of rollers which carry it to the mill. And no human hand is seen in the * operation. In another place lady-like machines seem to dance lightly in front of the furnaces, occasionally stretching out a hand, seiz- ing a red-hot billet, and waltzing with it to the rolling-mill. These marvels of mechanical skill have swelling skirts that make * the idea of the ball-room irresistible. Being suspended from above so that their mechanism is not visible by night, they move backwards and forwards, from one side to the other, tripping 1 66 GROWTH OF HOMESTEAD along a row of furnaces and pirouetting diagonally back with a swift, graceful, and noiseless sweep in a fashion that suggests nothing but play and Virginia reels. And the beautiful lumps of steel, white-hot and dripping with fire, are carried as lightly as a girl's bouquet, and deposited just as lightly in the lap of a chaperone, when their owner glides with easy turnings out into another dance. In yet another place is a comical being that runs busily about carrying hot things round corners. When this grotesque ma- chine gets to the end of his track he makes a quick half-turn to the right and runs on again. And all the while he holds in one hand a long rubber tube, like a boy at a May-pole. This contains the electric wires that give him life and intelligence. The wizard who has endowed these machines with their amazing power is a quiet, modest young fellow, Alva C. Dinkey, the present superintendent of the great works. If any of the junior partners merit the title of " young geniuses," Mr. Dinkey is certainly one of the first. Mr. Dinkey has also charge of the four Carrie blast-furnaces just across the river at Rankin, which supply a part of the pig- iron used at Homestead. One of these was removed from Ohio by the Carrie Furnace Company, rebuilt here in 1883 and blown in on February 2Qth, 1884. Another was built by the same company in 188890. The Carnegie Steel Company built the others. They are each 100 feet high, with 2 3 -foot bosh and 15-foot hearth. Their total annual capacity is 672,000 tons of metal, which is hauled, in a molten state, by locomotives across the river bridge to Homestead. The last built of these furnaces produced 206,650 tons of pig-iron in 1902. This is believed to be the world's record. CHAPTER XI THE INCOMING OF HENRY CLAY FRICK IN 1882, the iron and steel business whose growth we are tracing may be said to have attained its majority. Just twenty- one years had elapsed since the building of the Kloman mill at Twenty- Coke-ovens. . ninth Street, when the infant industry emerged from the embryonic state of Girty's Run. Thanks to skilful nursing, it had passed easily through the dangers and diseases of childhood; and under the stimulat- ing pabulum of a high tariff it had waxed big and lusty beyond all precedent. Like most overgrown things, however, it was ill-proportioned and awkward. There was an uncertainty about its movements which showed that its physical growth had outstripped its mental development. There was none of that harmonious working of parts and effective unity of in- terests which bespeak the well-balanced organism. This was now to be changed not suddenly and by a con- scious effort, but, as is the nature of all growth, quietly, gradu- ally, and by unnoticed movements. The most conspicuous step in the mental evolution of this \ industrial organism was the simple and prosaic incident which brought Henry Clay Frick into contact with it. At the time this seemed a very commonplace occurrence. Similar things had happened in the history of the enterprise a dozen times without attracting more than a passing attention. The present 167 1 68 HENRY CLAY FRICK one produced a revolution. A simile from the science of biol- ogy suggests itself. One of the lowest forms of life exists as a little floating globe of jelly, which surrounds and absorbs into itself every smaller thing that bumps against it. Sometimes, however, a more highly developed creature comes along and reverses the process. Something akin to this happened now. Up to the time of the incoming of Mr. Frick the group of men with whom he now allied himself had had no definite pol- icy. The several industrial establishments had all been started by some outer accident, and each had developed along its own line as the needs of the day required, and as the fostering hand of the Government was laid more or less kindly upon it. The Kloman germ grew under the stimulus of the war; and the Twenty-ninth Street mill was built to meet the increased de- mand for Kloman axles. The Cyclops or Thirty-third Street mill was but an accidental offshoot of the Kloman stem; and the business of both grew with the country's growth and the general development of the iron trade. The Keystone Bridge Company was simply the incorporation of an existing business. The suggestion of the Lucy furnaces came from outside ; as did also that which resulted in the steel business at Braddock. The Homestead works were built by outsiders ; and their absorp- tion by the Carnegie group was a mere accident. And yet, in conformity with those laws underlying all growth, the line of progress was one which ever tended to round out and complete the series of operations in the conversion of crude iron ore into finished materials. But this was a natural and unconscious development growing out of trade conditions. There was at no time a well-defined plan or policy of expansion. With the incoming of Mr. Frick, however, this vague pro- gression at once assumed a definite character. It was the marshalling of hosts into a coherent unit, with one mind ruling all for the good of each. To give a just idea of the revolutionary character of the changes inspired by Mr. Frick, it is necessary to anticipate Plate IX, HENRY CLAY FKICK A MIRACLE OF INDUSTRIALISM 169 events a little, and give a rough outline of the perfected organi- zation which he built up out of the scattered units which he found. These units were the Upper and Lower Union Mills, the Lucy Furnaces, the Edgar Thomson Steel Works, the Key- stone Bridge Works, the Pittsburg Bessemer plant at Homestead, and the little interests in coke and coal at Larimer and Unity, and in ore at Scotia. There was also, at Beaver Falls, the Hartman Steel Works, an unqualified failure and source of uninterrupted vexation to its owners. Apart from the Edgar Thomson works and the Upper Union Mill, which had been consolidated, each of these plants had its separate organization. Such exchange of benefits as was possible among them was off- set by the petty factions and jealousies which the Carnegie sys- tem of unfriendly rivalry had established. While there was a feeble attempt at consolidation made in 1886, before Mr. Frick assumed supreme power, it did little more than modify the disunion described. Once in control, Mr. Frick assembled these disorganized units into a solid, com- pact, harmonious whole, whose every part worked with the ease and silent motion of the perfectly balanced machine. This mammoth body owned its own mines, dug its ore with machines of amazing power, loaded it into its own steamers, landed it at its own ports, transported it on its own railroads, distributed it among its many blast-furnaces, and smelted it with coke simi- larly brought from its own coal-mines and ovens, and with limestone brought from its own quarries. From the moment these crude stuffs were dug out of the earth until they flowed in a stream of liquid steel into the ladles, there was never a price, profit, or royalty paid to an outsider. Without any cessa- tion of motion and with hardly any loss of heat, this product passed with automatic precision into the multitudinous machines which pressed it into billets, rails, armor-plate, bridge structures, beams, and the endless variety of shapes required in modern architecture. Finally these highly finished materials were often conveyed to consumers over the same transportation systems as i;o HENRY CLAY FRICK before ; and the profit of every movement, as of every process and change of form, passed without deduction into the exchequer of what was now the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited a single organization with one mind, one purpose, one interest. The annual earning power of this great institution increased under Mr. Frick's direction from $1,941,555 to $40,000,000 in a dozen years ; while its annual product of steel increased during the same period from 332,111 tons to 3,000,000 tons. The change thus baldly and inadequately expressed in terms of dollars and tons makes the most impressive record, for such a short period, of any manufacturing * i rf organization in this or any other country. Henry Clay Frick, to whose remarkable executive and admin- istrative ability this miracle of industrialism is due, was only thirty-three years of age when he joined the Carnegies; and already he had achieved the most note- worthy success in the coke indus- VVP try of Pennsylvania. Born at West Overton in 1849, young "Small farm chores." FHck ^ found ^ ^ Q age of ten gathering sheaves in the wheat-fields, carrying wood and water, and doing such small farm chores as came within his child's strength. This was his way of spending the summer holidays. It afforded him the best of exercise, and probably gave him that vigor and recuperative power which, later, astonished the sur- geons who were probing to find the assassin's bullets in his sadly wounded body. In undertaking this farm work the child acted on his own impulse. He did it to earn enough money to buy his clothes. Then he went back to school, where he displayed the same earnestness of purpose. At the age of fourteen he not only bought his own clothes but entirely THE ROMANCE OF COKE 171 maintained himself, working behind the counter of a country store. At nineteen he became bookkeeper in his grandfather's flouring-mill and distillery at Broad Ford, in the centre of what is now the Connellsville coke region. At the threshold of manhood he thus found himself fortuitously placed in the field of his future activities, where he was destined to find both wealth and honor. The history of the development of the Connellsville region is necessarily a sketch of the personal career of Henry Clay Frick. He was one of the first, even at this youthful age, to recognize the importance to the expanding iron industries of Western Pennsylvania of this wonderfully rich deposit of cok- ing coal. He has been the leading spirit in its development ; so that to-day, in some of the iron-producing centres of the United States, Connellsville coke is known only as Frick coke. He built railroads for transporting it ; and he alone effected the consolidation of the industry as it now stands. Every great industry has its romance. That of Connells- ville coke began in 1842, when a couple of small barges loaded with it were floated down the Ohio to Cincinnati. There the furnace men looked on it with suspicion and called it " cinders." It was sold in small lots at eight cents a bushel ; and a large quantity remained after three weeks' effort to dispose of it. This remainder was finally traded for a small patent grist-mill, which was brought to Connellsville, and turning out to be a failure, was there sold for $30. But the foundryman who got the coke afterwards thought well enough of it to make a trip to Connellsville to get more. In this he was disappointed. No one was willing to repeat the experiment, for a time at least. In. 1850 there were only four establishments making coke in the whole of the United States. In 1860 the census shows that there were twenty-one such establishments, all in Pennsylvania; and ten years later, when Frick had already appeared on the scene and had become inter- ested, there were but twenty-five coking plants in the country. i;2 HENRY CLAY FRICK In 1871 young Frick organized the firm of Frick & Co. with Abraham O. Tintsman, one of his grandfather's partners, and Joseph Rist. They had three hundred acres of coal lands and a plant of fifty coke-ovens. At this time there were not four hundred ovens in the whole Connellsville region, which included an area of one hundred square miles. The Mount Pleasant and Broad Ford Railroad, of which Frick was one of the pro- jectors, was opened about the same time. The next year Frick & Co. erected Coke-ovens under construction. one hundred and fifty more ovens. Then the panic of 1873 came, and everybody but Frick thought the business had come to an end. But he had gauged its possibilities ; and, with a confidence in the country's growth rare in one of his years, he realized that the depression was of that tidal character which would eventually carry the business to higher levels than before. Timid competitors anxious to sell out at any price found a ready purchaser in the firm of Frick & Co. ; and in the lean years following the panic he acquired the interests of his partners, who, burdened with unpaid-for purchases, staggered and finally fell in the storm. By a singular paradox the panic which ruined his partners made Henry C. Frick' s fortune. When the trouble had passed, the price of coke rose from ninety cents to $4 and $5 a ton ; and the boom put young Frick at the head of the coke industry. By 1882, when Frick admitted the Carnegies into his business, he had acquired 1,026 ovens and 3,000 acres of coal land. The business was now reorganized with a capital of $2,000,- ooo; and a year later this was increased to $3,000,000 to keep pace with the expansion of the trade. By 1889, when its capi- tal was increased to $5,000,000, the H. C. Frick Coke Com- A GREAT BUSINESS 173 pany owned and controlled 35,000 acres of coal land and nearly two-thirds of the 15,000 ovens in the Connellsville region, three water plants with a pumping capacity of 5,000,000 gallons daily, thirty-five miles of railroad track, and 1,200 coke-cars. The company employed 11,000 men. The volume of shipments amounted to 1,100 car-loads a day, or 330,000 cars a year. This is equivalent to 10,000 train-loads, which, strung together, would extend from New York to San Francisco, or from London across the continent of Europe, through Persia, and well on the road to India. In 1895 the capital of the H. C. Frick Company was further increased to $10,000,000. It now owned 1 1,786 ovens; 40,000 acres of Connellsville coal . lands, out of a total of sixty to sixty-five thousand acres, and its capacity was 25,000 tons of coke a day, or eighty per cent, of the entire pro- duction of the Connellsville region. A little later its monthly output amounted to an even million tons ! Coke-ovens under construction. Such, baldly stated, are the achievements of the man who from now on becomes the most conspicuous and imposing figure in this history. CHAPTER XII THE CAPTURE OF THE DUQUESNE STEEL WORKS MR. FRICK'S first great achievement after assuming the leadership of Car- negie Brothers & Co. was the capture of the rival steel works at % Duquesne, on the Monon- gahela River, a short dis- tance above Homestead and Braddock. This mas- terly move eliminated a dangerous competitor from the rail market, and gave the Carnegies one of the most modern and best- ' equipped steel works in the country without the outlay of a single dollar. Even the unparalleled rec- ord of Carnegie successes contains no greater industrial victory than this; and business men in Pittsburg still regard it as the greatest example of skilful financiering and management in the history of the American steel trade. The building and early history of the Duquesne steel works recall those of Homestead. In a sense, indeed, the former may be considered a continuation of the latter ; for they were planned for similar reasons, completed by the same men, failed for kin- dred causes, and were eventually sold to the same purchasers. The Duquesne Steel Company was organized on June 4th, 17* Kloman's successor forging an axle. TO CHECK COMPETITION 175 1886, with a capital of $350,000. Before the plant was com- pleted, disagreements arose among the promoters, and these, joined to a call for more money, resulted in the suspension of construction work. The enterprise was subsequently reorgan- ized ; and the Allegheny Bessemer Steel Company was formed, in March, 1888, with a capital of $700,000, to take over the unfinished plant and carry it through to success. Among the incorporators were E. L. Clark of the Solar Iron Works and William G. and D. E. Park of the Black Diamond Steel Works. These gentlemen subscribed for nearly six-sevenths of the total capital. The other members of the corporation were also practical men. Mr. C. Ansler, consulting engineer of Macin- tosh & Hemphill, superintended the building of the works; and neither money nor pains were spared to equip them with the most improved machinery. The buildings were of an unusually substantial and enduring character. They comprised convert- ing and blooming house, 75 feet by 200; a rail-mill 68 feet by 380; a building covering the hotbeds 80 feet by 200; while the wings inclosing the finishing machinery were 48 feet by 64. There were two Bessemer converters, each with a capacity of seven tons. Operations were commenced in the blooming-mill on Feb- ruary Qth, 1889, and a month later in the rail-mill. The long- threatened competition with the Carnegie rail monopoly in the Pittsburg district had begun. It was met by Andrew Carnegie in a distinctly original fashion. The Duquesne people, in their search for improved methods, had planned to run their ingots from the soaking-pits, without further heating, through the various rolls that pressed them into billets and rails. This was an unheard-of innovation in America, although something of the kind had been done in Eng- land; and Sir Henry Bessemer had long ago predicted that the practice would become general. The ingots, having passed through the 32-inch blooming-mill, went at once through the 26-inch roughing-train. After shearing, the piece went straight 1/6 CAPTURE OF DUQUESNE on to the two finishing-trains, which were equipped with espe- cially powerful engines. Thus the re-heating of ingots was dispensed with ; and from the mould to the finished rail the steel passed only once through the furnace, instead of twice or thrice, as in other works. On learning of the adoption of this economy by a competi- tor, Andrew Carnegie drafted a circular to the railroads, warn- Ingots going from the Duquesne soaking-pits to the rolls. The mechanical perfection is shown by the small number of workmen visible. ing them against using the rails thus made, which he repre- sented as defective through lack of homogeneity. Although this was not believed by the Carnegie officials, the circular, having been sent to Pittsburg for that purpose, was printed and mailed to the purchasing agents of the railroads throughout the country. When asked if he considered this a legitimate form of competition, one of the Carnegie partners of that time replied that " under ordinary circumstances he would not have TROUBLE WITH LABOR 177 thought it legitimate ; but the competition set up by the Du- quesne people was also not legitimate, because of their use of this direct rolling process." In further self -justification he added : " They were a thorn- in our flesh and they reduced the price of rails. If they had made rails by our method, w*e would have recognized them as legitimate competitors ; but when we were attacking their method of rolling we could not recognize them by letting them take a contract." Pressed to explain the last sentence, Mr. Carnegie's partner said : " We could not divide business with them as we other- wise would have done." It is worthy of remark that this method of direct rolling was not abandoned when the Carnegies acquired the Duquesne mills. On the contrary it was adopted in all their other works, and is now general throughout the country. Presumably steel-makers have learned to overcome the lack of homo- geneity against which Mr. Carnegie warned the railroads. The mechanical superiority which the Duquesne works showed over every similar plant in the country was not enough in it- self to offset the deficiencies of management which soon became manifest. There were also contentions with labor. The old antagonism to trades-unions that brought trouble to the first owners of Homestead, cropped out at Duquesne. Signs were put up all over the yards and shops announcing that " no union men are allowed on these works." When Mr. William G. Park saw them he gave orders that such signs as were accidentally destroyed should not be renewed. The directors dared not discredit their manager by removing the offensive placards; but they let it be quietly The offensive placards. 1 78 CAPTURE OF DUQUESNE known that a driver who knocked one of them down and de- stroyed it would not be punished for carelessness. Some of these signs were still in existence when Mr. Frick bought the works. There were also defects in the operating department ; so that large quantities of second- and third-rate rails accumulated in the yards. The dissatisfaction of the owners with the man- agement was augmented by several serious losses growing out of undesirable contracts. In fairness to the managers, however, it should be confessed that they were really obliged to take these contracts in order to keep running ; for the rail pool, at the instigation of the Carnegies, constantly headed them off from all desirable business, and obliged them to take such orders as no mill in the pool wanted. As a result the stockholders were soon called upon for additional capital. First $100,000 was called for; then twice .as much. This the stockholders refused; and Mr. William G. Park had to pay it all. So that a suggestion from Mr. Frick that the Carnegie Company might buy the property at a bargain found Mr. Park in a particularly receptive mood. The price first talked about by Mr. Frick $600,000 was considered too low by Mr. Park, as no doubt it was. The works had cost nearly twice that sum. They had made as much as five hundred tons of rails and billets in twenty- four hours ; and while their cost from pig-iron to rails was high $8.14 in October, 1889 the stockholders were loath to accept any very great loss. On the other hand, Mr. Frick showed no disposi- tion to increase the bid which he had thrown out in a tentative way ; and so the thing dragged on for nearly a year. During this time Mr. Park obtained options on his partners' holdings ; and when the negotiations were resumed he was able to offer the entire stock of his company. During the month of August preceding the final sale the output of the rail-mill was the largest in its history 16,814 tons. The output of raw steel was over 20,000 tons ; and 1 7,000 tons of blooms were made. BRILLIANT FINANCIERING 179 On this showing Mr. Frick, in October, 1890, raised his bid for the plant to $1,000,000 in bonds, material on hand to be appraised and paid for in cash. On the 3Oth of the month this offer was accepted; and a couple of weeks later the plant was turned over to the Carnegies. Once more they were with- out a rival rail-mill in their own territory. At this time the works consisted of two seven-ton converters, six cupolas four for iron and two for spiegel seven soaking- 1 Copyright by S. S. McClure Co. Pouring steel from converter into ladle. pits, four trains of rolls, and the necessary boilers, engines, and other equipment to successfully operate a blooming and rail mill of that size. It is commonly believed in Pittsburg that the plant thus bought with nothing but an issue of bonds, paid the new owners $1,000,000 in the first sixty days. This is not true; but the works did pay for themselves within a year, for, with his habit- ual foresight, Mr. Frick had provided a market for their prod- uct before he bought them. The rail-train was changed to make billets ; and these were promptly marketed at good prices. i8o CAPTURE OF DUQUESNE Before the bonds became due the plant had paid for itself six times over; and the surplus earnings had gone into the construc- tion of four large blast-furnaces. Mr. Frick always had an instinct for picking out the right man for every place ; and his intuition did not fail him when he selected Thomas Morrison for Duquesne's first superintend- ent under the new regime. This young man was a distant con- nection of Andrew Carnegie; but he made no attempt to trade the fact for favors. He took a humble place in the machine- shops at Homestead, and caught the notice of his superintend- ent, Mr. Potter. Mr. Prick's attention having been drawn to the youth, he watched him for a while, and decided that he was capable of better things than he was doing. Greatly to the young man's surprise he was selected for the responsible posi- tion of superintendent at Duquesne. Here the men tried to take advantage of his youth ; but he met the attempt with dig- nity, and, being supported by the firm, had no further trouble of that kind. In one of Mr. Prick's weekly reports in June, 1891, he says: "Matters have been looking threatening at Duquesne. Morrison has handled the matter very well. He is not much of a talker." In that he was a man after Mr. Prick's own heart. Early in 1892 Morrison was instructed to get up plans for two blast-furnaces at Duquesne, which he did ; and the same month he was given a small interest in the Carnegie Company. During this time the plant was being operated as the Allegheny Bessemer Steel Company, the former owners not having yet closed all the old transactions. By July this had been done ; and the plant was taken into the consolidation of all the Car- negie works that formed the Carnegie Steel Company. Owing to the disturbing effects of the Homestead strike the two Duquesne furnaces, planned early in 1892, were not com- menced until November 5th, 1894. By August of the follow- ing year, 1,700 men were at work on them; and the first one was blown in on June 8th, 1896. On October /th the second A WONDERFUL RECORD 181 furnace went into blast. In May, 1897, a third furnace was lighted ; and a fourth followed in June. Three of these stacks are 100 feet high by 22 feet at the bosh. The fourth is the same height and a foot narrower. For nearly four years they held the world's record; as much as 18,809 tons of metal being produced by a single furnace in a month.* Then the broom of supremacy, previously flaunted by Duquesne furnaces. the Lucy, and then by the Edgar Thomson furnaces, passed to another Carnegie stack, that known as Carrie No. 3. It is worthy of remark that when the Duquesne furnaces were put in operation, with all their labor-saving appliances, they cut the cost of labor per ton of iron produced to one-half that prevailing elsewhere. The rivalry started thirty years ago by the Lucy and Isabella furnaces still persists. Late in 1901 Carrie No. 3 made 790 tons in twenty-four hours. A month or so later furnace No. 2 of the National Steel Company at Youngstown, Ohio, produced * In October, 1898, the output of these four furnaces was as follows: No. i 1 8, 672 tons. 2 17.717 " 3 18,809 " 4 .. 18,060 " 1 82 CAPTURE OF DUQUESNE 806 tons. This furnace is 106^2 feet high and 23 feet in diameter. Later, furnace E at the Edgar Thomson works made 901 gross tons. It is probable that before these pages are in type some more modern furnace will make a thousand tons in a day. If so, the difference between the 50 tons that the Lucy first made, and 1,000 tons, will mark, in a way easy to under- stand, the progress in blast-furnace construction and practice of the period covered by this story and the one group of workers to which it relates.* To describe the further growth of these works in detail would take more space than is possible here. They were Mr. Prick's pride; and he lavished his best thought upon them. Hardly a month passed that did not see some important change and addition ; until for economy of operation they stood unri- valled among the steel works of the world. Here are the most important items in this record of growth and improvement : 1896 June ii Purchase of 57 acres of Hays estate adjoining. Oct. 9 Purchase of 65 acres from Oliver estate, including plats between railroad and river ; price about $200,000. Nov. 10 Purchase of 50 acres from Dr. W. S. Huselton for $150,000. " Dec. 19 Jones mixer, 200 tons, put in operation ; largest in the country. 1897 Feb. 2 Work commenced at Duquesne on Union Railroad. " May 6 No. 3 furnace blown in. " June 10 No. 4 furnace goes in blast. " Dec. 19 Work started on new billet-mill. 1898 June i Union Railroad completed and first run of hot metal from Duquesne to Homestead. " July 8 New i6-inch continuous mill put in operation. July 19 Union Railroad bridge finished, connecting Duquesne with Edgar Thomson works. " Aug. i Duquesne tube works sold by sheriff for $141,500 to Carnegie Steel Company. * At the Lucy furnaces at this date, 1903, the present superintendent, James Scott, was employed at the same plant soon after its construction, thirty years ago. No man in the Carnegie Steel Company, or indeed anywhere else, has been closer to the great changes described than Mr. Scott, and few men have contributed more to produce these changes. ANTICS OF A METEOR 183 1899 Feb. 7 Howard Glass House and 27 acres purchased for $300,000. " Apr. 10 Coal dock on Monongahela River contracted for. ' ' Oct. 6 New blooming and billet mills and open-hearth plant to cost $2,500,000 first publicly announced. " Nov. 20 Excavations for open-hearth plant started. 1900 Feb. 1 6 Plans for new i-j-inch continuous billet-mill announced. " Apr. 5 Plans for new 10- and 13-inch double-storage mill an- nounced. " Oct. i Two new open-hearth furnaces started. " Nov. 27 4O-inch mill began operations. Dec. 13 Two more open-hearth furnaces started. 1901 Jan. 2 Excavations started for new 14-inch mill. " Feb. 7 Excavations for foundations of two new merchant mills. " Mar. i Date of merger with United States Steel Corporation. The present capacity of the works is 750,000 tons of pig- iron a year, and 600,000 tons of raw steel. The whole of this material can be made into finished products on the place. These totals are twenty times as great as the first year's output of the Edgar Thomson works. In view of the short time in which these results have been attained, the enthusiasm of the local editor is pardonable, even when after comparing Duquesne to " the meteor that has darted out of space and cut a brilliant path across the sky" yet "remains in the horizon, more lus- trous than ever," he calls it "the acknowledged young giant and the mastodon of the unconquered and the unconquerable Monongahela valley." There is certainly much in Duquesne to arouse local pride. CHAPTER XIII LABOR CONTESTS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE THE great Homestead strike, which forms the most dramatic episode in the history of all the Carnegie enterprises, grew out of con- ditions without parallel in the industrial history of this or any other country. Su- perficially, this contest was a commonplace struggle between capital and labor concern- ing the equitable division of the results of their J int efforts. But behind this were certain moral causes, growing out of the con- I flict between the idealistic platform-theories of Andrew Car- I negie and the unsentimental exigencies of business. A brief i glance at the attitude towards labor of Carnegie the manu- facturer, as contrasted with the academic utterances of Carnegie the philanthropist, is necessary to an understanding of the re- moter and more obscure causes of this titanic struggle, which, marked as it was with all the ferocity of civil war, caused -a shudder to run through the civilized world. Incidentally such a retrospect will also show that no successful business can be built on philanthropic aphorisms. Nor can Utopianism be grafted upon an industrial system still rudimentary in its de- velopment, without producing fruit of an unexpected and inju- rious variety. The first strike in the history of the Carnegie iron business was that of 1867, when, as has been related, the puddlers resisted a reduction of wages. This was ended by a sudden boom in the iron trade which called all idlers back into the shops at better wages than before. The Carnegies, however, in 184 PHILANTHROPIC POSTURING 185 common with other manufacturers, had attempted to break the strike by the wholesale importation of foreign labor. While at this time there was no open hostility on the part of the manu- facturers to labor-unions per se y there was also no public glori- fication of them. As for Carnegie himself, his influence was too unimportant to have much effect on his partners ; but so far as is known, the business man was still dominant in the dual personality which later puzzled partners and workmen alike by an altruism never before professed by any employer. At the end of 1875, just after the starting of the Edgar Thomson works, mutterings of discontent were heard amongst the men, and a strike became imminent. During the few weeks that the plant had been in operation some minor weaknesses and defects had shown themselves in the machinery ; and, to remedy these, the excuse offered by the discontent of the men was seized upon to shut down the works. Stunned into sub- mission by the swiftness of the blow, the men readily signed the agreement presented to them by the company before they were allowed to return to work; and the lesson thus learned lasted long. Many years of peace supervened at the Edgar Thomson works. There was still no philanthropic posturing. It was all business, and very properly so. In July, 1884, the Carnegies had a strike at their Beaver Falls mill. This plant, known as the Hartman Steel Works, was an unimportant but costly side-issue growing out of an effort to find new markets for raw steel. Designed to lead the world in nails and wire rods, the enterprise was an unqualified failure from the start ; and, except for a brief period under the management of Mr. P. R. Dillon, it remained so to the end, when it was cleverly sold by Mr. Frick to the Wire Trust, and closed and dismantled. The strike referred to was a frank trial of strength between the Carnegies and the Amalgamated Asso- ciation. Andrew Carnegie entered upon it with many misgiv- ings, telling Hartman, his partner, that no one could success- fully fight the Amalgamated Association "within the smoke of 1 86 LABOR CONTESTS Pittsburg. " Hartman thought otherwise; and, being empow- ered to carry the fight to a finish, did so in excellent style and won a complete victory over the labor organization. The con- test had all the usual features the importation of workmen from other districts, followed by rioting among the strikers, at- tacks on the " black sheep," and the arrest, trial, and conviction of the rioters. There was no display of sentimentality among * the owners ; and the labor-union was temporarily crushed out of the mill. The folly of thus crippling a labor organization that gave the Carnegies an advantage in their iron works over competitors whose plants were less favorably located, was not yet recognized. With the possible exception of Mr. Walker, none of the Carne- gie partners seemed aware of the economic principle underlying the Amalgamated Association's requirement of uniform wages for the same class of work regardless of other conditions a principle that inured to the advantage of the best-equipped and most favorably located plants. Given a uniform price of labor throughout the country, the Pittsburg iron-mills, by reason of their proximity to coal and ore, and their unequalled transporta- tion facilities, possessed enormous advantages over competitors in other districts; and an enlightened business policy would have encouraged any organization that, without unduly interfer- t ing with the management, kept the cost of labor down to the level of that possible in the worst-equipped and least favorably situated works in the country. Recognition of this principle came later; and brought a change in the company's treatment of labor organizations. But unfortunately the change was \ credited to humanitarian motives, instead of being frankly stated as a business principle; and there inevitably arose conflicts between the ideal and the real between Andrew Carnegie's philanthropy and his material interests. In 1885 Andrew Carnegie made his first public address, and began that series of lectures and essays on the natural rights of labor with which his name has since been identified. " TRIUMPHANT DEMOCRACY" 187 A year later Triumphant Democracy was published. Ostensu bly a record of the material progress of the United States dur- ing the preceding fifty years, this book was made a vehicle for the advanced views of Carnegie on the political and social equality of all men. It was also a glorification of the toiler. The book attained a large circulation, especially among work- ingmen, who were enabled to buy it at a nominal cost through their labor organizations. In the same year he also published, in the Forum, an essay on the relations of capital and labor, in which appeared the following paragraph : " While public sentiment has rightly and unmistakably con- demned violence even in the form for which there is the most excuse, I would have the public give due consideration to the terrible temptation to which the workingman on a strike is sometimes subjected. To expect that one dependent upon his daily wage for the necessaries of life will stand by peaceably and see a new man employed in his stead is to expect much. This poor man may have a wife and children dependent upon his labor. Whether medicine for a sick child, or even nourish- ing food for a delicate wife, is procurable, depends upon his steady employment. In all but a very few departments of labor it is unnecessary and I think improper to subject men to such an ordeal. In the case of railways and a few other employments it is, of course, essential for the public wants that no interrup- tion occur, and in such case substitutes must be employed; but the employer of labor will find it much more to his interest, wherever possible, to allow his works to remain idle and await the result of a dispute than to employ a class of men that can be induced to take the place of other men who have stopped work. Neither the best men as men, nor the best men as workers, are thus to be obtained. There is an unwritten law among the best workmen: 'Thou shalt not take thy neighbor's job.' ' Lofty in spirit and purpose as this essay was, its humani- tarian intent was grossly perverted by the labor agitator; and its broad and liberal principles were garbled so as to seem an authoritative excuse for violence. Unfortunately for the work- 1 88 LABOR CONTESTS men of Braddock and Homestead, they mistook these high phil- anthropic views for the serious designs of their employer towards themselves; and this misunderstanding was intensified by Car- negie's method of ending the coke strike, mentioned later, and also by an incident which happened about this time at Braddock. This was somewhat as follows : On account of some grievance the women employed in the Pittsburg laundries refused to work, and enlisted the aid of the Knights of Labor to keep other women from taking their places. The Knights of Labor went to Captain Jones and demanded the discharge of an old Carnegie employee, whose two daugh- ters were working in one of the proscribed laundries. Jones refused in that sonorous language with which he was so highly gifted. The matter was thereupon taken direct to Mr. Carne- gie, who ordered the man's dismissal, with the remark, " We cannot afford a strike for a principle. " At the same time he ordered the old man's wages to be continued for a couple of months. Strange to say, the sturdy old fellow refused them. No one was more surprised at this compliance with their demand than the Knights of Labor themselves ; and its effect on this dictatorial organization was most disastrous for the Car- Regies. Within a little while they had a strike of their own as a result of the meddling of the leaders of this most offensive of all labor-unions. In Captain Jones' statement of the causes of the great out- put of the Edgar Thomson works, quoted in a previous chapter, he says : " I soon discovered it was entirely out of the question to expect human flesh and blood to labor incessantly for twelve hours, and therefore it was decided to put on three turns, reduc- ing the hours of labor to eight." He adds that "this proved to be of immense advantage to both the company and the workmen, the latter now earning more in eight hours ANDREW CARNEGIE'S PINKERTONS 189 than they formerly did in twelve hours, while the men can work harder constantly for eight hours, having sixteen hours for rest." Jones' praiseworthy effort to amend the lot of the laborer was afterwards found to put the Edgar Thomson works at a disad- vantage with competing establishments where two twelve-hour turns were the rule; and an effort was made in 1887 to induce the Edgar Thomson men to return to the old system. At the same time a sliding scale of wages was proposed, similar to that which had been found successful in the North Chicago rolling-mill and in the Crescent Steel Works at Pittsburg. The men were willing to accept the sliding scale ; but they were unwilling to return to the twelve-hour system. The usual strike resulted ; but before it had gone far a committee of the strikers went to see Mr. Carnegie at the Windsor Hotel, New York. There he reasoned with them, and talked them into a conciliatory frame of mind; and they agreed to sign the con- tract he put before them. The affair seemed to have reached a happy conclusion ; and the labor leaders left for Pittsburg in the best of spirits. As Mr. Carnegie bade them good-bye, he pressed into the hands of each a copy of his Forum essay. This the men read on the train ; and on their arrival at Braddock they promptly repudiated the agreement they had signed and continued the strike. Mr. Carnegie made no effort to conceal his disappointment and chagrin. Summoning Captain Jones to New York, a brief conference was held at the Windsor; and from there Jones went over to Philadelphia and engaged a little army of Pinker- ton guards for service at Braddock. Then Mr. Carnegie retired to Atlantic City, where he was kept posted as to the current of events by his cousin, George Lauder. Under the protection of Pinkerton guards the works were now put in operation by non-union men. The usual disorders took place, resulting in a slight loss of life ; but eventually the contest was won by the company. The struggle lasted from. 1 9 o LABOR CONTESTS December, 1887, till May, 1888. Thus ended the eight-hour day in a night of sorrow and suffering. Unfortunately the effect of this incident did not end with the strike. It is being used in 1903 as an argument against the compulsory eight-hour day which Congress is now consid- ering; so that this great step in the elevation of the laborer will probably be delayed by Jones' unlucky experiment. Andrew Carnegie's later opinion of the Knights of Labor, whom he blamed for the untoward result of his efforts at conciliation, was not very high. When asked by an English reporter if we have not such an organization in America as the Knights of Labor, he replied with emphasis : " Say rather we had. It was one of those ephemeral organi- zations that go up like a rocket and come down like a stick. It was founded upon false principles, viz., that they could com- bine common or unskilled labor with skilled." The coke strike^ to which reference has been made, also took place in 1887. This at first was a matter of wages pure and simple; but, as in so many contests between master and workmen, higher considerations were soon involved. As has been related, the Carnegies bought a large interest in the H. C. Frick Coke Company in 1882. In 1886, by the withdrawal of two of Mr. Prick's earlier associates, this interest was largely increased ; and the Carnegies acquired a majority of the coke company's stock. For the regulation of output and to control competition, the coke operators of the Connellsville region had some sort of a gentlemen's agreement; and when, in 1887, trouble concerning wages arose, these owners acted in unison, and all conferences with the workmen's unions were conducted by a joint committee. By agreement with the trades- unions the Knights of Labor and the Miners' and Mine Laborers' Amalgamated Association the matters in dispute were submitted to arbitration. The Board of Arbitration con- sisted of two members appointed by the manufacturers, two by BAD FAITH ALLEGED 191 the labor-unions, and these four elected a fifth, who was to serve as umpire in qase of a failure of the whole board to reach an understanding. This contingency arising, the decision was left to the umpire ; and his award, when issued, was unfavor- able to the men. Thereupon a strange condition arose. The main bodies of the labor-unions accepted the umpire's judgment, as in good faith they were required to do ; but the local lodges denounced it as "unjust and unwarranted," and refused to be bound by it. A strike ensued, which the Knights of Labor called illegal; and, as if to further justify the characterization, the men resorted to all the old-time acts of violence. Men who were willing to work were maltreated and shot; dynamite was used to blow up the mines ; machinery was destroyed, and thou- sands of tons of coke were allowed to spoil in the ovens. It was at this stage that Carnegie cabled from Scotland a positive order to accede to the strikers' demands ; and, as he and his partners controlled the Frick Coke Company, the order was carried out regardless of outstanding obligations to the other manufacturers. Naturally the defection of the most im- portant member of the group excited in the rest the bitterest of feelings ; and Mr. Frick promptly resigned the presidency of the company which bore his name but which he no longer con- trolled. The rest of the manufacturers set their teeth and continued the struggle ; and, to the surprise of everybody, finally gained a complete victory over their men. The apparent act of bad faith on the part of the Carnegies received universal condemnation. It was ranked above that of the strikers who had repudiated the decision of their umpire. The breaking up of the combination was also deplored because it involved demoralization of prices on which the wages ulti- mately depended ; so that in the long run the workmen would suffer by the act. But those who made these criticisms did not consider the risk which the Carnegies ran in banking up their blast-furnaces. The best furnace will not stand banking for more than three months ; and during this time there is always 1 92 LABOR CONTESTS a danger of its becoming chilled. When this happens it has to be blown out, and partially if not wholly relined at a cost of at least $35,000. At this date the Carnegies had seven furnaces banked; so that there was almost a quarter of a million dollars in hourly peril. In addition, there was a positive loss amount- ing to many thousands of dollars daily through the stoppage of iron production, and further losses in the steel-mill through lack of material. On the other hand, the advantage which the Car- negies would have over competing iron manufacturers by get- ting a regular supply of coke and continuing work while all others were idle, was one almost beyond compute. While this alone might not tempt the average manufacturer to a breach of faith, it would do much to console him for it if other conditions produced it. Of course the workmen were not informed as to all the reasons which prompted the Carnegies to yield to their de- mands ; and they not unnaturally supposed that their victory was due, in some mysterious way, to the inalienable rights of labor and all the other pretty texts with which they had become familiar. There is no doubt that this misunderstanding gave rise to the frightful disorders that ensued, three or four years later, in the same region. The settlement just narrated was made in July, 1887. From that time until early in 1890 the H. C. Frick Coke Company paid twelve and one-half per cent, more for labor than did other operators. In February, 1890, however, a general scale was agreed upon covering wages in the Connellsville region under which all operators paid the same rate. This scale expired a year later; and the men refused to sign the new one designed in continuation of it. After repeated conferences, at which no agreement was reached, an effort was made to start the mines and ovens with new workmen. For three months the whole region was given over to rioting, arson, and murder. Armed mobs attacked the mines and coking plants, killing and maim- ing the workers, destroying the machinery, and defying the ETIQUETTE FOR STRIKERS 193 county officials who sought to bring order out of the industrial chaos. Gangs of men marched through the night terrorizing the peaceful members of the community; and when deputy sheriffs attempted to arrest them, the strikers assumed military formations and shot their pursuers at sight. One such body marched across a large extent of the country, occasionally brought to bay, when battle was given and taken with all the tactics of irregular warfare. In this guerilla-like march and pursuit eight of the strikers were killed and many more were seriously wounded. As the Carnegies had a fair supply of coke on hand at the outbreak of hostilities, and as the prices of steel and rails were low, the war was fought to the bitter end. Eventually the rioters were caught or driven out of the region, and others willing to accept the wages they refused received adequate protection. A year after the establishment of peace came the Home- stead strike. In the mean time, however, Mr. Carnegie's Fonim essay, in the hands of undiscriminating workmen, had become a veritable manual of etiquette for strikers. The last quoted sentence, the Carnegie contribution to the decalogue, became in its terse and picturesque vigor, the most understandable of all the tenets of "the little boss; " and there was no Slav nor Hungarian at Connellsville and Homestead so mean of intellect as not to realize its full purport. As for the Knights of Labor, over whom Mr. Carnegie had pronounced so slighting a funeral oration, they sprang to a joyful resurrection with this text as their watchword : "Thou shalt not take thy neighbor's job." Before proceeding to a review of the immediate causes of the greatest of all the Carnegie struggles with labor, it is fit- ting that a glance should be given at the material conditions surrounding the workmen at Homestead. To this end may be quoted the sympathetic summary of a description of the men at work which is published in Bernard Alderson's biography of Mr. Carnegie under the latter's own supervision : 194 LABOR CONTESTS "Thus far," says Mr. Alderson, "we have studied Mr. Car- negie in theory. Now let us see how he has put all these ad- mirable sentiments and unimpeachable principles into practice. The best test that can be applied is the condition of labor sur- rounding his own workmen. Mr. Hamlin Garland, a well- known writer, though having no technical experience, describes the impressions he received from a visit to the Homestead works. His training as a novelist naturally impelled him to look at things from the descriptive writer's point of view, and not become interested in the picturesque, both horri- ble and attractive. In his approach to Home- stead Mr. Garland was struck by the desolate appearance of the dis- trict, and the wretched- ness of the town itself, he says, was deplorable. 'The streets were hor- rible; the buildings were poor; the side- walks were sunken and full of holes; and the crossings were formed of sharp-edged stones like rocks in a river- bed. Everywhere the yellow mud of the streets lay kneaded into sticky masses, through which groups of pale, lean men slouched in faded garments, grimy with the soot and dirt of the mills. The town was as squalid as could well be imagined, and the people were mainly of the discouraged and sullen type to be found everywhere where labor passes into the brutalizing stage of severity. ' These depressing conditions are apparently inseparable from a newly established iron or steel mill in any locality, and this is especially true where soft coal is used. Grime, heat, hard, exhausting labor, these are conditions that are to be found in Copyright by S. S. McClure Co. 'Looks like hard work." "A DOG'S LIFE" 195 every steel-mill, and the works of the Carnegie Company differed little from other manufactories of the same kind except in ex- tent, but it may be truly said that the larger the mill the more depressing the conditions. After commenting on the muggy, smoke-laden atmosphere, he [Garland] proceeds to describe the conditions inside the mills, and the men engaged at their tasks, and tells us that they worked with a sort of desperate attention and alertness. 'That looks like hard work/ I said to one of them to whom my companion introduced me. He was breathing hard from his labor. 'Hard! I guess it's hard. I lost forty pounds the first three months I came into the business. It sweats the life out of a man. I often drink two buckets of water in twelve hours ; the sweat drips through my sleeves and runs down my legs and fills my shoes.' 'But that isn't the worst of it, said my guide, a former employee. 'It's a dog's life. Now those men work twelve hours, and sleep and eat out ten more. You can see a man don't have much time for anything else. You can't see your friends or do anything but work. That's why I got out of it. I used to come home so exhausted, staggering like a man with a jag!" With this picture in mind it is worth while to quote from Mr. Alderson's preceding page a characteristic phrase from Andrew Carnegie : " The lot of a skilled workman," he says, " is far better than that of the heir to an hereditary title, who is very likely to lead an unhappy, wicked life." Little wonder that the skilled workman, with the sweat dripping through his sleeves and running down his legs and filling his shoes, failed to understand the man in whose inter- est he was making such terrific exertions. " Kind master," he cabled during the strike, " tell us what you want us to do and we will do it ! " " Again and again he [Hamlin Garland] is impressed, " con- tinues Mr. Alderson, " with the general appearance of exhaus- tion that is shown in the haggard faces of the toilers, and he says 'their work is of the sort that hardens and coarsens.' 196 LABOR COXTESTS Everywhere in the enormous sheds were pits gaping like the mouth of hell, and ovens emitting a terrible degree of heat, with grimy men filling and lining them. One man jumps down, works desperately for a few minutes, and is then pulled up. ex- hausted. Another im- mediately takes his place ; there is no hesitation. When he spoke to the men they laughed. It .vinter when he made his visit. They told him to come in the summer, during July, when one could scarcely breathe. An old workman, relat- ing the experience of his first day's toil, says he ap- plied for work, and the su- perintendent, saying he looked strong and tough, set him on the pit work. For the first time in his life he fainted repeatedly, and when he left at night he could scarcely drag himself home. They take great risks, too; and the injuries sustained are of a most frightful char- acter. An explosion in the pouring of the molten metal, and half-a-dozen men are terribly mangled and one or two killed. Such incidents are not infrequent. The continuous dread of an accident, combined with the intense drive of the work, constitute a fearful strain. This is a fearful picture, painted in the darkest, most repulsive colors, but this is but one side of it. Nothing is said of the comfortable homes which steady employment at from four to ten dollars a day enable the steady, sober workman to maintain the self-confidence that continuous employment begets. The environments of the mills were improved as rapidly as possible, streets were paved, schools were established, and public institutions of various kinds were initiated. Several free educational institu- tions-were founded by Mr. Carnegie in an attempt to help his workmen help themselves. The other side of the picture is full of light and hope, though there are many exceptions. Copyright b\ S. S. HcClure Co. Preferable to a peerage. DANTE S INFERNO 197 ;y of the men have happy families, and those of the better class are very well off. The company houses are very good, and have all modern conveniences, and the men who are sober and care for their families, besides being prosperous live comfortably. The effect of the work on these men was brought out in a conversation which Mr. Garland had the morning after his visit to the mills. 'The worst part of the whole business,' said the workman, 'is, it brutalizes a man. You can't help it. You start to be a man, but you become more and more a machine, and pleasures are few and far between. It's like any severe labor; it drags you down mentally and morally just as it duur PROTECTED * M^KINLEY TARIFF Ano AftMY o> PIN KEftTONS. \&S\ *t!L*jy * SHOTS AT TO S OPTION 69 H.C.KKICX A campaign pleasantry. CHAPTER XVII Ore-docks" and vessels. A RELUCTANT SUPREMACY IT is something more than a coincidence that the day that marked the beginning of the Homestead strike saw the birth of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. On July 1st, 1892, for the first time in their history, the separate establishments whose growth we are tracing were brought into a single organization, and endowed with one mind, one purpose, one interest. Mr. Frick was too wise a general to enter a battle with his forces needlessly scattered ; and while fences were being built around the company's works, their corporate strength was also concentrated and made instantly responsive to his will. The consolidation of the different Carnegie interests had, however, long been contemplated by Mr. Frick. As early as February, 1890, he had discussed the project with Mr. Abbot, chairman of Carnegie, Phipps & Co., and had made it the sub- ject of a written communication to Mr. Carnegie. But at that time there were obstacles of a financial nature. One concern was used to make paper for the other, as the phrase is. That is, one Carnegie company selling to another was able to discount the notes it received in payment ; so that the transaction had all the banking advantages of an outside trade. On occasions, too, such notes could be discounted without any antecedent 254 A GREAT CONSOLIDATION 255 sale. In transactions of this kind Mr. Stewart, with his strong financial connections, had long proved very useful. Mr. Stewart had died in 1889. His interest had been acquired by Mr. Frick, who, adding it to his previous holdings, thus became as large a stockholder as Mr. Phipps, and second only to Mr. Carnegie. At the same time Mr. Frick became chairman of Carnegie Brothers & Co., Limited, as well as a director in Carnegie, Phipps & Co. Having previously resumed the presidency of the coke company, which he had resigned under circumstances already related, Mr. Frick freely used its credit to finance the two steel companies and their subsidiary interests, and thus made it unnecessary to maintain their organi- zations separate. The consolidation of thece interests would have come in the course of time as a measure of economy; but the combination was hastened by the threat of war with labor. The sociologist will be interested in this illustration of the unifying effect of war in industrialism. Predatory competi- tion, which is a form of warfare, has a similar consolidating effect; and the modern trust is its most conspicuous expression. The processes of industrial evolution often take a form that in- evitably suggests the thought that even such great leaders as Mr. Frick, with their apparent independence and strong govern- ing power, are little more than passive instruments through which natural forces operate. The changes which an industrial organism undergoes in its development are unquestionably governed by the same laws as those which mould the less com- plex forms of life, to which the doctrine of evolution is popu- larly limited; and it often appears that the strong personality of the greatest captain of industry can do little more than con- trol the direction of this growth. His power is comparable to that of the gardener who fastens the young shoots of his peach tree to the southern wall, and causes it to spread out in the sunshine more than it would if left alone. In the consolidation of July ist, 1892, the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, became the owner of the Upper and Lower 256 A RELUCTANT SUPREMACY Union Mills, the Lucy Furnaces, the Edgar Thomson Steel Works, the mills at Homestead, the newly acquired property at Duquesne, the Keystone Bridge Works, the unprofitable and prolonged experiment at Beaver Falls, with a few other interests in ore and natural gas sprinkled about Western Pennsylvania. 1 .The capital was $25,000,000. It was a gigantic concern; but, as De Tocqueville says of the United States of his time, it was "a giant without bones." It had gristle, however, and this soon hardened into bones. Having brought the separate establishments into a single organization, Mr. Frick now sought to harmonize their relations so that each plant would serve to supplement and round out the operations of every other. This he effected by the Union Rail- way, which he built to connect the principal works with each other and with all the different transportation systems entering the Pittsburg district. It was a masterly conception; for it unified the scattered works and made them as easy to operate as if they had been contiguous. At the same time it gave them unequalled transportation facilities through direct connection with every important railway system in Western Pennsylvania. The advantages of easy exchange of products among the different works cannot be stated in figures ; but they have their place in the phenomenal record of the firm's profits given else- where. The saving in switching charges alone paid interest on the cost of the railroad ; and the company was allowed twenty- five cents a ton rebate on ore rates. A further advantage was that the company thus regained possession of its own yards. Hitherto the different railroads running into the works had control of all tracks and sidings ; and so tenaciously did they hold to these cheaply acquired rights that they often resisted the extension of a mill that in- volved the removal of a track. This cause of annoyance now came to an end; and a judicious rearrangement of tracks and sidings, so as to meet changed conditions, resulted in a great saving of yard space and expedited the handling of vast ton- THE EDGAR THOMSON SI THE HOMESTEAD STE1 THE DUQUESNE STEE Plate L WORKS, BRADDOCK, PA. \ V "XL, WORKS, MUNHALL, PA. VORKS, DUQUESNE, PA. THE UNION RAILROAD 257 nages. The superiority of this system, by which the traffic was regulated by one organization instead of by several railroads, is readily seen when a statement is made of the total tonnage entering and leaving the works of the Carnegie Steel Company. In 1899 this amounted to 16,000,000 tons as much as the combined total freight handled by the Northern Pacific, Union Pacific, and Missouri Pacific railways, with their 13,000 miles of track, 1,500 locomotives, and 50,000 freight-cars. The next step in the progress of this great industrial aggre- gate towards completeness was that which gave it possession of the iron ore it needed. This was the only thing it had to buy of outsiders. So long as it did not itself produce everything it needed, it could not be considered a perfect industrial unit, such as it was Mr. Prick's ambition to make it. An accident helped him to a realization of his great plans ; though they were nearly frustrated through the unexpected opposition of Mr. Carnegie. The story of the way the Carnegie Steel Company acquired ' its great ore mines on Lake Superior lacks none of the romance that makes the history of Homestead and Duquesne so inter- esting. It is the story of a huge profit made with hardly a < dollar of investment, and the accepting of an impregnable posi- tion in the industrial world with a reluctant and complaining consent. It is the amplified tale of the " most hazardous enter- prise," told afresh ; but where a thousand dollars was then in- volved, a hundred millions now hold our interest. Unfortu- nately it is a story that shatters all preconceptions of the genius necessary to achieve millionaireship ; but that is merely inci- dental. Among the boy companions of Thomas M. Carnegie was Henry W. Oliver. He had become one of the cleverest busi- ness men of Pittsburg, and had made several fortunes in iron and steel manufacture before he reached the maturity of mid- life. He was singularly far-sighted and enterprising, and a skilful financier. Some time in 1892 he formed a company, called after himself, to operate the Missabi Mountain mine on 17 2 5 8 A RELUCTANT SUPREMACY the Mesaba range; his main object being to provide a cheap and uninterrupted supply of high-grade Bessemer ore for his own furnaces. Mr. Frick, who had similar ideas for his own works, watched the experiment with interest ; and presently he suggested to Mr. Oliver that an ore combination with the Carnegie Steel Company might be made mutually beneficial. Mr. Oliver was quick to see the advantage of such a union; permitting him, as Group of miners near Lake Superior. it would do, to bargain with independent miners and transporta- tion companies on a basis of a high minimum. In other words, the enormous consumption of ore of the united plants would enable him to offer a guaranteed tonnage to railways and steam- boat companies in exchange for low rates, as well as to make exceptional offers to mine owners willing to let their ores be worked on a royalty basis. He therefore viewed the sug- gestion with favor, and, after some negotiations, agreed to Mr. Frick' s proposal to give the Carnegie Company one-half the A DISCREDITED PROPHET 259 stock of the Oliver Mining Company, conditioned on a loan of half a million dollars, secured by a mortgage on the ore properties, to be spent in development work. In this ingenious way Mr. Frick so arranged that the Carnegie ore interest would not cost a dollar. The matter was at once brought to the attention of Mr. Carnegie, who laconically opposed it as follows, in a letter dated Rannoch Lodge, Kinloch-Rannoch, Perthshire, August 2Qth, 1892: " Oliver's ore bargain is just like him nothing in it. If there is any department of business which offers no inducement, it is ore. It never has been very profitable, and the Massaba is not the last great deposit that Lake Superior is to reveal. " Mr. Frick, however, made the combination with Mr. Oliver ; and, on his return from Europe, Mr. Carnegie expressed him- self so vigorously in condemnation of it that there ensued the first coldness between himself and Mr. Frick. Mr. Carnegie's attitude was not modified by the successful working of the arrangement ; and during the next two years he repeatedly placed himself on record, with increasing emphasis, as being opposed to any venture in Lake Superior ores. Writ- ing to the Board of Managers from Buckhurst Park, Withyham, Sussex, on April i8th, 1894, he says again: "The Oliver bargain I do not regard as very valuable. You will find that this ore venture, like all our other ventures in ore, will result in more trouble and less profit than almost any branch of our business. If any of our brilliant and talented young partners have more time, or attention, than is required for their present duties, they will find sources of much greater profit right at home. I hope you will make a note of this prophecy. " Of course the managers made a note of the prophecy; and it afterwards furnished subject for many a subdued laugh at their meetings. 26o A RELUCTANT SUPREMACY It subsequently transpired, however, that Mr. Carnegie thought his company was entitled to a larger share than one- half of the Oliver Mining Company's stock; and, to please him, Mr. Oliver consented to sell the Carnegies an additional interest of one-third, making their holdings five-sixths of the total stock. But he took care to safeguard his own interests by a contract under which the Oliver furnaces were entitled to one- An open-pit mine. sixth of all ore mined by the company. At this time the capi- tal of the Oliver Mining Company was $1,200,000. In 1896 Messrs. Oliver and Frick made the celebrated Rockefeller connection, by which they leased the other great mines on the Mesaba range on a royalty basis of only 25 cents a ton. This low price was given by the Rockefellers in consideration of a guaranteed output of 600,000 tons a year, to be shipped over the Rockefeller railroads and steamships on the Lakes, with an equal amount from the Oliver mine. This A SAVING OF $27,000,000 261 amounted to 1,200,000 tons a year; and as the contract was to run for fifty years, it meant a guarantee of 60,000,000 tons of freight, at 80 cents a ton by rail and 65 cents a ton on the lakes * a consideration great enough to justify the low royalty of 25 cents when other mine owners were getting 65 cents. To the Carnegie- Oliver iron interests it meant a visible saving of $27,000,000. This alliance with the Rockefellers had an unexpected re- sult. It produced a panic among the other mine owners ; and stockholders in Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, and the Northwest hastened to get rid of their ore properties at almost any price. The demoralization extended to the ore markets; and Norrie, , which sold at $6 a ton in 1891, dropped to $2.65 on the docks at Cleveland. This was Mr. Oliver's opportunity; and backed by Mr. - Frick and some of the more enterprising Carnegie managers, like Curry, Schwab, Gayley and Clemson, he hastened to secure options on all the best mines in the Lake Superior region. The following is the argument he submitted to the Carnegie mana- gers on July 2 /th, 1897 : NEW YORK, N. Y., July 27, 1897. H. C. FRICK, Chairman, DEAR SIR : I mail you my specific reports on the Norrie, Tilden, and Pioneer mines. I now address you mainly to impress my views that it should be our policy to acquire all three of these properties. We (I mean the -Carnegie and Oliver furnaces) have paid more than our share of tribute to Cleveland and Northwestern miners. Part of their receipts were profit, but a large part was wasted in expenses that we will in the future save : in exploration, In which we will benefit; in development of mines that have proved failures ; and in excessive freight rates to steamship lines controlled by the Cleveland middle-men. All this should stop. I claim that we could produce and deliver our ore to Lake Erie ports 20 to 30 cents per ton cheaper than it can be done by those now in control of the mines we seek. Our saving would 262 A RELUCTANT SUPREMACY be in steady and more regular mining, in avoiding a line of high salaried officers, in procuring lower Lake freights, and in sav- ing the Cleveland commission of 10 cents per ton. I am satis- fied that the economies that we will practise in the lines above indicated will be fully equivalent, in the future, to any royalties we may pay. The Carnegie furnaces and the Oliver furnaces will require about four million tons of ore per annum. Our minimum, under my proposition, would stand as follows : Mesaba 1,200,000 Norrie 700,000 Tilden 400,000 Pioneer , 500,000 TOTAL , 2,800,000 Tons On the above, the only cash obligation that we will have if my plan is carried out, is in the purchase of the Norrie stock. The Mesaba leases we can throw up on six months notice, and the Tilden and Pioneer leases on three months notice. The amount that we would invest in the Norrie is a very small item, considering the immense stake we have in the business and the fact that if we do not fortify ourselves on the plan that I have indicated, it would be easy for the mine owners to exact three to four millions of dollars, or even a greater sum, from us, as a profit on the ore we consume. A glance at the prices paid for ore the past 10 or 15 years will show that my estimate of the profits that we have paid them is extremely conservative Excuse me for bringing to the attention of yourself and your associates the fact that the Carnegie Company never here- tofore hesitated to invest millions of dollars to save 25c to 55 00 >oo A YEAR 303 The first would give us $ 5,000,000.00 more, 30, 000,000. oo The second 12,500,000.00 more, 37,500,000.00 I am certain that in two years hence we shall be on the basis of $25,000,000.00 net yearly, even at low prices. We have to supply the world note last week's British advices less Ore this year and last from foreign points ; great scarcity; prices wild; coke put to 15/6 [fifteen shillings and sixpence] at Works, best grade; bad to get at that; near $3.75 per ton and scarce. Impossible to increase supply of either Coke or Ore. Since we reach Atlantic ports at $1.00 per ton, we have the trade of the world. I favor holding on for two or three years ; no question but we can sell our property at $400,000,000.00. 200,000,000 Bonds @ 5^ = $10,000,000.00 200,000,000 Stock @ 6f = 12,000,000.00 $22,000,000.00 Surplus 3,000,000.00 We shall beat this why then not wait. If you wish to sell now then here is the plan. A. C." (PROSPECTUS) THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY, LIMITED, and 'the H. C. FRICK COKE COMPANY. In pursuance of a decision of long standing, the four princi- pal owners of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the H. C. Frick Coke Company (MM. Carnegie, Phipps, Frick and Lauder) now retire from active business. To enable them to do so, and with the approval of all the younger Partners, the partnership has been changed to a corporation Capital $300,- 000,000.00. One half $150,000,000.00 Gold Mortgage Bonds; Preferred Stock, 6%. . . .75,000,000.00 Common Stock, 75,000,000.00 All the Bonds and Preferred Stock will be taken payment by the four outgoing Partners. Part of the Common Stock will be held by the present younger Partners ; part is now offered to the public. Applications from Pittsburg and Western Pennsylvania, 304 THE ZENITH OF PROSPERITY especially in Manufacturers of Iron and Steel, will be given preference, the desire being to enlist as many experienced busi- ness men at home as possible. All the present Partners agree to continue in the service for Five (5) years. MM. Carnegie, Phipps, Frick and Lauder also agree to remain for that period in their present positions as Consulting Partners. The Partners have agreed to make good any deficiency in the Net Earnings, should such occur during said five years, in the amount necessary to pay interest on Bonds and upon Pre- ferred Stock, and 6% upon Common Stock. To meet this liability there has been deposited with .... Trust Company, $20,000,000.00 of Bonds, contributed pro rata by the Partners. The present earnings of the Companies exceed the sum required for the payment stated and leaves a satisfactory sur- plus for contingencies. Additional Works now in progress, which the demand of the ever growing business required, will add to the earnings. The property of the new Company em- braces all the property of the two former Companies ; every- thing is included real estate, railroads, coke lands (38,000 acres unmined), mills, furnaces, houses, offices, water rights, mines, and everything of every description. The debts of the Company, including all Mortgage Bonds, etc., are more than covered by the quick assets the Stock of Material, and the Bills Receivable, and the Cash on Hand. The Company starts with Working Capital. (SIGNATURES) This prospectus is true ; nothing kept back. These different plans of consolidation and reorganization were still under consideration when, towards the end of March, overtures were made by ex-Judge W. H. Moore of Chicago for the purchase of the Carnegie- Frick properties, with the view of combining them. This time an effort was made to get a price on Andrew Carnegie's individual holdings of stock in the two companies, carrying as they did control; but, for the sake of appearances, Mr. Carnegie refused to deal with outside parties, and stipulated that the negotiations should be conducted in the names of his principal partners, Phipps and Frick. Accord- ingly these gentlemen joined the syndicate, with the under- THE MOORE OPTION 305 standing that Moore and his friends should finance the entire scheme. Carnegie demanded a million dollars for a ninety days' op- tion on his entire interests at a price of $157,950,000; and he afterwards raised this bonus to $1,170,000. The increase was met by Messrs. Phipps and Frick each contributing $85,000, Carnegie agreeing to return these sums to them later. The other members of the steel and coke companies required no bonus for an option on their shares except the nominal sum of one dollar. These agreements were signed on April 24th. If the sale, had been consummated it would have been on the basis of $250,000,000 "for the entire ownership of first party [Andrew Carnegie] and associate owners and interests in all the properties and assets of The Carnegie Steel Co. Ltd., except its holdings in the stock of the H. C. Frick Coke Co., and allied interests, namely : about thirty (30) per cent, of the whole of the said H. C. Frick Coke Co., in which thirty per cent, in said H. C. Frick Coke Company interests the said second parties [H. C. Frick and Henry Phipps, Jr.] may take first party's interest on the basis of Seventy millions of dollars ($70,000,000) for the whole of the said H. C. Frick Coke Co. properties and allied interests." And "as to the first party's individual holdings of stock in the H. C. Frick Coke Co. and allied interests, this shall be upon the basis of Seventy millions of dollars for the entire property and assets of the H. C. Frick Coke Co. of which stock the holdings of the said first party is about twenty-five (25) per cent, of the whole." To quote still further from the original option, "the first party agrees to take as part payment for his interests as above one hundred millions of dollars ($100,000,000) in five per cent, fifty year, gold bonds, to be executed by such individual cor- poration or limited partnership association, as may be desig- nated by the second parties, or their assigns, which bonds shall be secured by a mortgage upon all the real estate of the Carne- gie Steel Co. Ltd. and to be a first lien thereon, except so far 20 3 o6 THE ZEXITH OF PROSPERITY as the same shall be now encumbered, and which shall cover all of the stocks, interests and securities covered by this option." ... " The remainder of the consideration for the sale of the interests hereby optioned is to be in cash." In this way Carnegie would have been so secured that he would virtually have had a first mortgage on all the partnership assets, thus gaining a preference over all his partners. An instrument of a like tenor and purport was signed by other members of the Carnegie- Frick companies, without any forfeitable bonus. At the time this option was bought the money market was in such condition that no difficulty was anticipated by Judge Moore in raising the necessary funds to carry out his plans, huge as these were. He represented that he would have the co-operation of the National City and the First National Banks of New York. The death of Roswell P. Flower, however, and the forced liquidation of the many industrial securities that he had been supporting, brought on a panic that was as disastrous as it was unexpected. Occupied in protecting existing obliga- tions, bankers and capitalists had little disposition to engage in fresh ventures; and realizing the impossibility of safely launching a great enterprise in such troubled waters, Messrs. Frick and Phipps went to Scotland to try to get an extension of their option. At Skibo Castle Mr. Carnegie refused to extend the option, and the negotiations came to an abrupt end. An interesting document was drawn up at this time which is worth including here, presenting as it does at a glance the imposing magnitude of the business whose growth we have traced from the little Kloman forge in the basement at Girty's Run. It is the draft of a prospectus prepared by the Moore Syndicate, but never published. It marks the zenith of the Carnegie Steel Company's prosperity. Supplementing it is a letter from Mr. C. M. Schwab, of considerable interest. THE MOORE PROSPECTUS 307 (PROSPECTUS) A limited amount of the stock of the "CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY" is now offered to the public, on the following basis : The corporation which it is planned to form with the name " Carnegie Steel Company," will have, through a charter to be obtained under the laws of Pennsylvania, appropriate powers for acquiring, producing, manufacturing and dealing in steel, iron, ore, coal and coke, and all things made of steel or iron, with all other powers deemed convenient, and will have an authorized capital of two hundred and fifty million dollars ($250,000,000), di vided into two million five hundred thousand (2,500,000) shares of the par value of one hundred dollars ($100) each. Each subscriber will agree to take and pay for the number of shares for which he may subscribe, or such smaller propor- tionate number as may be allotted to him in the event of over- subscription, of the full-paid stock. The price is to be one hundred dollars ($100) in cash for each share of stock, and is to be paid into such depository as may be designated by the Managers in control of the subscrip- tion lists, within ten days after notice calling for such payment shall be delivered or mailed to the subscriber; but ten dollars out of every one hundred dollars of subscription may be made payable immediately on allotment, if so stated in the notice thereof. If the stock certificates cannot be delivered when payments are completed, receipts will be issued calling for the stock when ready. The corporation is to be vested with fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) in cash and also with the cash and other avail- able assets of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the H. C. Frick Coke Company, and, subject to a Bonded Debt of one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) in 50 year 5$ Gold Bonds, with the properties of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the H. C. Frick Coke Company, which include the following: The Edgar Thomson Works, at Bessemer, Pa., including: Edgar Thomson Blast Furnaces, Edgar Thomson Foundry, Edgar Thomson Steel Works. The Duquesne \Vorks, at Duquesne, Pa., including: Duquesne Blast Furnace, Duquesne Steel Works. 3 o8 THE ZENITH OF PROSPERITY The Homestead Steel Works, at Munhall, Pa., including: Bessemer Steel Department, Open Hearth Steel Department, Finishing Mills, Armor Plate Department. The Carrie Blast Furnaces, at Rankin, Pa. The Lucy Blast Furnaces, in Pittsburg, Pa. The Keystone Bridge Works, in Pittsburg, Pa. The Upper Union Mills, in Pittsburg, Pa. The Lower Union Mills, in Pittsburg, Pa. The H. C. Frick Coke Company's Coal and Coke properties in Westmoreland and Fayette Counties, Pa., including: About 40,000 acres of unmined coal, 20,000 acres of surface lands, 1 1 ,000 coke ovens ; 2,500 railroad cars, 3,500 dwellings. The Larimer Coke Works, at Larimer, Pa. The Youghiogheny Coke Works, at Douglas, Pa. All the capital stock of the following Companies : The Union Railroad Company, The Slackwater Railroad Company, The Youghiogheny Northern Railway Company, The Carnegie Natural Gas Company, The Youghiogheny Water Company, The Mount Pleasant Water Company, The Trotter Water Company, The Pittsburg and Conneaut Dock Company. Over one-half the capital stock of the Pittsburg, Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company. 43.6 per cent, of the capital stock of the Pennsylvania and Lake Erie Dock Company. One-fourth of the capital stock of the New York, Pennsyl- vania and Ohio Dock Company. Five-sixths of the capital stock of the Oliver Iron Mining Company, owning : All the stock of the Metropolitan Iron and Land Company, All the stock of the Pioneer Iron Company, Over 68 per cent, of the stock of the Lake Superior Iron Company, Over 98 per cent, of the stock of the Security Land and Exploration Company, Other ore properties in negotiation which will be included if acquired. AN IMPRESSIVE DOCUMENT 309 One-half of the capital stock of the Pewabic Company. Three-fourths of the capital stock of the Pittsburg Lime- stone Company, Limited. Other interests in Ore Mines, Transportation Companies, Dock Companies, Valuable Patents, and Companies owning Patents, etc. These Furnaces, Steel Works, Coke Works, and other prop- erties are in full operation, their latest complete months' prod- ucts being as follows : BLAST FURNACES. PRODUCT GROSS TONS. Names. Stacks. Mar., 1899. Apr., 1899. Edgar Thomson Furnaces 9 90,585 88,937 Duquesne Furnaces 4 70,261 63,012 Carrie Furnaces 2 18,935 I 9,447 Lucy Furnaces *. 2 6,031 9, 100 Total 17 185,812 180,496 STEEL WORKS. PRODUCT GROSS TONS. Names. Mar., 1899. Apr., 1899. Bessemer Steel Edgar Thomson Steel Works 66,427 Duquesne Steel Works 53,189 Homestead Steel Works 31,282 Total 150,898 Open Hearth Steel Homestead Steel Works 90,088 Total Steel Ingots 240,986 212,163 . ROLLING MILLS. PRODUCT GROSS TONS. Names. Kind. Mar., 1899. Apr., 1899. Edgar Thomson Steel Works. . Rails I79> 2 56 159,344 Duquesne Steel Works Billets 29,315 29,223 do Sheet Bars 14,556 n,478 do Splice Bars 4,207 3,409 Homestead Steel Works Blooms and Billets. 95,635 82,977 do Structural 22,043 22,179 do Plates 8,651 8,818 Upper Union Mills Structural 12,106 11,028 do Plates 8,455 7,466 Lower Union Mills Structural 4,374 3,947 do Plates 3,543 3,429 3 io THE ZENITH OF PROSPERITY COKE WORKS. SHIPMENTS NET TONS. Names. Mar., 1899. Apr., 1899. H. C. Frick Coke Company 506,870 477,640 Larimer Coke Works 5,030 5,090 Youghiogheny Coke Works 2,860 1,850 Total Coke 5*4, 760 484,580 OTHER DEPARTMENTS. PRODUCT GROSS TONS. Kind. Mar., 1899. Apr., 1899. Edgar Thomson Foundry Castings 5,465 5,439 Duquesne Steel Works Finished Splices 4.H4 3,47o Homestead Steel Works Armor 446 621 do Rivets and Bolts 125 105 do Castings 152 200 do Fitted Work 1,958 1,928 do Columns 635 41 1 Upper Union Mills Rivets and Bolts 21 20 do Fitted Work 346 713 Lower Union Mills Axles 2,629 1,664 do Forgings 108 103 do Spring Steel 638 731 Keystone Bridge Works Bridge Work. 3,394 2,933 do Castings 274 348 do Rivets 116 143 As has been the fixed policy of the " Carnegie " Associa- tions during the past twenty years, Improvements, Extensions and Additions are constantly being made. Blowing Engines are being added at Edgar Thomson, Duquesne and Carrie Blast Furnaces, which will increase the product of Pig Iron 175,000 tons per annum. Ten Open Hearth Furnaces, a 30 inch Slab- bing Mill, a 128 inch Plate Mill and a 42 inch Universal Plate Mill are building at Homestead Steel Works, and will be com- pleted in June and July next, increasing the product of Steel Ingots 350,000 tons per annum, and of Plates 300,000 tons per annum. A Steel Axle Works, at Howard, near the Homestead Steel Works, will be completed by November next, with a capacity of 100,000 tons of Car Axles per annum. Many other minor Improvements are under way, all with a view to increas- ing product, decreasing cost or expediting shipment. The present output of these Works is at the annual rate of 2,200,000 gross tons of Pig Iron, Spiegeleisen and Ferro-man- POSSIBLE PROFITS $4325322 A MONTH 311 ganese; and 2,800,000 gross tons of Steel Ingots, with ade- quate finishing capacity. The Improvements now approaching completion will increase the output to the annual rate of 2,375,000 gross tons of Pig Iron, Spiegeleisen and Ferro-manganese ; and 3,150,000 gross tons of Steel Ingots, with sufficient finishing capacity to turn this Steel into Rails, Billets, Structural Shapes, Plates, Railroad Forgings and other Merchantable forms. The Net Earnings of the business which will be transferred to the " Carnegie Steel Company " were For March, 1899 ". $1,652,038.75 For April, 1899 1,888,227.72 Owing to the magnitude of the business, and the immense tonnage of the various products, it is necessary that long time contracts be made, far in advance of the time of delivery. The result is that present shipments are at prices far below present rates, the rates at which contracts are being made for future delivery. Had current prices been obtained for the shipments during these two months, the Net Earnings would have been For March, 1899. $3,182,574.95 For April, 1899 4,325,922.78 and with present market prices and the increased product result- ing from the Improvements named, an average single month's Net Profit will largely exceed the above; justifying the expec- tation that the " Carnegie Steel Company " will pay annually, under almost any condition of business : 5$ on $100,000,000 Bonds $5,000,000.00 And at least 6% on $250,000,000 Stock 15,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 and leave an ample surplus for extra Dividends, as well as for other Improvements and Additions which will still further in- crease the Net Earnings and the rate of Dividends on the Stock, besides providing a fund for retiring the Bonds at maturity. The Carnegie Steel Company has been, is, and will be in an absolutely independent position, owning the sources of supply : Ore, Coal, Coke, Limestone and Natural Gas ; the Transporta- 3 i2 THE ZENITH OF PROSPERITY tion Lines for bringing the raw materials to the Works ; the Docks for handling Ore; the Coke Works, Blast Furnaces, Steel Works and Finishing Mills, each advancing the product to a higher grade, until it is ready for the markets of the World, with every intermediate profit saved for the benefit of its Stock- holders. The efficient Organization which had brought the " Carne- gie " Associations to their present unassailable position will remain intact. Nearly all of the former Shareholders in The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the H. C. Frick Coke Company, all of whom were actively engaged in the business, have taken Stock in the " Carnegie Steel Company," and many other Offkers and Employes, Superintendents, Foremen, Heads of Departments, Sales Agents, Workmen and Clerks, have sub- scribed for Stock in the new Company, demonstrating their faith in its future and ensuring the same bold yet conservative management which has rendered possible such an aggregation of capital as this ; making large profits, yet earning them ; con- trolling the market, yet never abusing its power; encouraging the wider use of Steel by the reductions made in its Cost, yet paying the highest wages in the World. Such has been the past, such is the present and such will be the future of the Car- negie Steel Company. PITTSBURG, PA., May i5th, 1899. MY DEAR MR. FRICK: You ask me to give my views as to the probable future earnings of the Carnegie Interests, and as to the proposed reor- ganization on a basis of $100,000,000 Bonds $250,000,000 preferred stock and $275,000,000 common stock. Permit me to say that commencing in 1879 as Engineer, constructing the works, ten years as General Superintendent of our principal works and over two years as President, I feel that I know the properties and their possibilities as well, or better than any one in or out of the concern. While we have been highly successful in the past, as every one knows, I believe we are only now getting in shape to be truly successful and truly profitable. Our April profit and loss sheet shows earnings slightly over $1,500,000.00 with rails netting us only $17.50 and billets $16.00. Lowest prices we ever had on an average were $16.50 for rails and $14. 50 for billets, so you see we have reaped very little of the advantages of increased prices. With prices anywhere near to-day's sell- ing prices we would easily make over $3, 000,000.00 per month, THE LAST BALANCE SHEET 313 TUB CARMEOIE STEEL COMPACT. LISITZD. Office of Secretory. BALAHOE SHEET, UAROB 1, 1900. ASSETS* CASHj- Treasury, Work*, Sale* Agenaie*. BILLS RECEIYA3LB, hORTGAOES RECEIVABLE! Employ**, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE! Current, Securiti STOCKSi Finiahed Product, Material* for Uae, Or* at Lake Porta, Ore at Mine*, AVAILABLE ASSETS, WRKS and PROPERTIES t- Edgar Thonaoa Vtorks, Duquecne Steel Worka, Duquetme Furna***, Honostoad Steel Worka, Carrie Furnace*, Howard Axle Work*, Luoy Furnace* t Keyaton* Bridge Work** Upper Union Mills, Lower Union ililla, Larimer Coke Work*, Youghioghsny Coke Worto* City Para Lota, Yerona Land, Liberty Pam, Oliver Land, Pawdott Land, 1300 E,iraOVE!Ot3- Ixigor -Thoftaon Parbaoee, Ed^r Tboaaan Steel Wka. Edgar fhocwan Foundry, Daqunen* Pumaces, Duquoone steel Wbrfc*. Honeatead Steel Wbrka, Carrie Furnaces, Howard Axle Works, Luoy Furnace*, Keystone Bridge V.'ork*, Upper Union Milla, Lower Union Mill*, STOCKS & BONDS. Inrertoent*, UNDIVIDED CAPITAL, DUE FROM PARTMER3, TOTAL ASSETS, LIABILITIES. JSORTQAGES PAYABLEi- Edgar Tboiason 7,'orkB, Duqueane Steel Worke, Duquoane Fornaoos, Itoneotead Steel Worka, Carrie Furnaces, Howard Axle Work*, Keystone Bridge Work*, Liberty yarn, Oliver Land, BILLS PAYABLSt Current, Stewart, Borntraeger, AOCOUUT3 PAYABLE! Current, Or*; SPECIAL DEPOSITS, LIABILITIES PATABLE, SPECIAL FUKDSl- Oontingent Fund, Contingent * Special, Relining Fond, Coal ExtinguiBhnent Fund, DOE TO FARTHERS, SURPLUS, CAPITAL, 10,429,594.T 2,333,406.35 5,626,211.91 -16,644,201.34 1.079.388.69 TIT, 478. 87 1,251,869.99 713,180.11 1,000,000.00 700,000.00 200,000.00 160,000.00 960,664.50 40,000.00 225,000 .dO 310,313.81 25.00 209,945.00 995,000.00 200,000.00 103,250.00 600,000.00 275,275.85 50,000.00 150,000.00 4,560,174.1 375,000.00 27V423. 56 2,49,650.44 240.150.21 557,143.50 711,310.00 211,328.85 15.822.45 6,579,914.19 25,000,000.00 l,287,48t.M 19,285.48 2i.302.SQ. 1,352,023,59 7,174,804.02 239,848.44 16,381,834.06 16,899,208.80 7,087,94.76 1,952,212.91 16.470.00 42, 396,513.74 988,797.31 14. 940. * 8.566.642.2 58,295.716.59 5.663.352.94, 101,416,802.43 2,734,470.8* 5,004,698.29 2,709,780.68 1.496 ,104. 30 , 113, 657. 38 81,579.914.19 101. 416.802. 43 Photographic copy of last balance sbet before consolidation. 314 THE ZENITH OF PROSPERITY and then our new works to be started in two months will, I estimate on present prices, bring us an additional profit of $600,000.00 per month or total of $3,600,000.00 per month. As to the future even on low prices, I am most sanguine. I know positively that England cannot produce pig iron at actual cost for less than $i i. 50 per ton, even allowing no profit on raw materials, and cannot put pig iron into a rail with their most efficient works for less than $7.50 per ton. This would make rails at net cost to them of $19.00. We can sell at this price and ship abroad so as to net us $16.00 at works for for- eign business, nearly as good as home business has been. What is true of rails is equally true of other .steel products. As a result of this we are going to control the steel business of the world. You know we can make rails for less than $12.00 per ton, leaving a nice margin on foreign business. Besides this, for- eign costs are going to increase year by year because they have not the raw materials, while ours is going to decrease. The result of all this is that we will be able to sell our surplus abroad, run our works full all the time and get the best practice and costs in this way. As to the works, any competitor will tell you that we are far ahead of any one, and, if the plans which we have for the future, are carried out we will be farther ahead than ever. I have no fears for the earnings in the future. I believe they will much exceed any estimate we have made, provided, how- ever, that the same methods of organization and operation as now exist, are fully carried out in the future. It must not be run as other concerns are run, but as it is now conducted. This is most important. I believe the earn- ings will fully justify the capitalization and as a proof of my belief in this, I am quite willing to take every dollar I own in the stock of the new concern on the basis proposed. Very truly yours, C. M. SCHWAB, President. MR. H. C. FRICK, Chairman, Building. The third attempt to sell the Carnegie properties to the public having thus failed, the partners returned to their schemes of consolidation and reorganization. This time Mr. Frick and the junior members took up the task; and they made ANOTHER SCHEME FAILS 315 elaborate plans 'for a new company with a capital of $250,000,- ooo and no bonds. This company was " to purchase from the Carnegie Steel Co., Ltd., for $195,312,500 all its properties real, personal and mixed, excepting its holdings in the stocks of the H. C. Frick Coke Co. "... and " from the H. C. Frick Coke Co. and its subsidiary companies named above, for $54,- 687,500 all their properties, real, personal and mixed; the total consideration, $250,000,000, to be paid in instalments as the stock subscriptions became due." Provision was made for "Andrew Carnegie to loan to each ' Debtor Partner ' an amount sufficient to enable him to pay his indebtedness to either sell- ing company." "All the stock" was to be "placed in a trust for ten years, during which time no stock shall be sold except- ing " from one owner to another, or by authorization of a three- fourths vote of stock in value and stockholders in number, or in the event of death of any member. This plan, representing the " unanimous views of every subscriber hereto, after full dis- cussions of all suggestions had at meetings held September n, 19, and 25," was commended to "the favorable considera- tion of the senior members." "We would not favor any plan that would contemplate bonding the property," they concluded. Ten signatures followed. Of course nothing came of it. It is surprising that any- thing should have been expected of a plan that did not " con- template bonding the property." Andrew Carnegie had placed himself on record with sufficient emphasis to leave no doubt in any reasonable mind as to the kind of security he wanted. So this plan joined the other liquid ideas that the corporate mind had secreted during the preceding years. CHAPTER XX CARNEGIE'S ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK IN chemical experiments it often happens that before the process of crystallization can be started in a saturated solution, a blow must be given to the vessel containing it. This was evidently the condition of the ideas that had long been floating in and out of the minds of the partners concern- ing consolidation and reorganization : it required the shock of a rupture between Carnegie and Frick to jar the fluid schemes into solidity. And in conformity with the run of forty years' uninterrupted Carnegie luck, this shock, which threatened at first to have a shattering effect, further welded the corporate interests, doubled the already enormous wealth of the principal partners, and made the little ones all millionaires. It was not inconsistent with its previous history that the Carnegie enterprise should reach its final and perfected form through strife. Born of a quarrel, it throve on contention. Each stage of its growth was marked by some dispute; and that it ever became a Carnegie concern, rather than a Miller, Coleman, or a Shinn creation, was solely due to the consolidat- ing effect of timely "ejectures," as Carnegie euphemistically named the expulsion of partners. The proposed "ejecture" of Frick, however, was not the simple matter it had been in previous cases. The man whose stubborn nature had passed through the annealing process a dozen times was not the one to accept an arbitrary dismissal ; and the fight he now made was as notable, and was as keenly 316 INTOLERANCE OF RIVALS 317 watched by the country, as was the contest with labor that had given him the real headship of the great organization he managed. In tracing the causes of this attempted "ejecture," the one just named was probably the first. Since the earliest days it had been the basis of Andrew Carnegie's policy to tolerate no rival. In every previous case the growing prominence of part- ners had been checked before it had become dangerous. The genius of Kloman, the strong personality of Coleman, the mas- terful competency of Shinn, each in turn was forced to yield to the superior money power of Carnegie, and to find, as one of the old partners graphically puts it, " a top fence-rail of its own to crow from." Phipps, willing to stand in the shadow and in- different even to the honors that were peculiarly his, inspired neither jealousy nor fear. Lauder was only Carnegie's echo. Singer conscientiously attended the Board meetings, and his ambition was more than satisfied with the prerogative of mak- ing the motion for dividends. Stewart was a good-natured and most useful treasurer, who could always get money on a pinch. Abbot, publicly greeted by Carnegie as " that young Napoleon of business " one day, was exiled almost the next. The busi- ness genius of T. M. Carnegie might have made him dangerous, but he died young. Of them all Frick, young, forceful, self- contained, tenacious, ambitious, and rich, was more than a rival ; he was an equal from the start. And when he emerged from the Homestead contest with the admiration of the country, while Carnegie had only mystified the people, his leadership was everywhere acknowledged. The first effort to diminish Prick's prominence was made in 1895. At this time he was trying to unify the coke- produc- ing interests in one great company. He had almost succeeded ; but there remained one third-rate operator who refused to join the combination on any reasonable terms. The character of this person was such that he was hardly tolerated amongst hon- est men, except when they met him at church ; and Frick had 318 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK ceased to seek his co-operation. Then Carnegie secretly took up the negotiation, and arranged a scheme by which this in- dividual, with his twelve hundred ovens, should assume the headship of the coke combination, while Frick with his ten thousand ovens, should modestly drop into a subordinate place. The project died with apoplectic suddenness as soon as it was proposed to the man most interested ; and Carnegie acquired a new view of his partner. Thereupon the office of president of the Carnegie Steel Company was created, and Mr. Leishman was put in with that title, Mr. Frick remaining chairman as before. To the outside world it looked as if Mr, Frick had been deposed from his headship by this proceeding ; but every clerk in the office and every man in the mills knew that this was not so. The power that ruled every department, from the highest to the lowest, was Frick ; and the president had merely such outside prestige as the chairman did not value. The cause of disagreement between Carnegie and Frick that had most influence in producing the final rupture was the divergent views they held concerning the price the steel com- pany should pay for coke. While Carnegie controlled a major- ity of the coke company's stock, through his personal holdings and those of the firm, there were a few outside shareholders whose interest it was that the steel company should pay the full market price for its fuel ; and to protect these minority stock- holders, Frick always made as good a contract as he could with the steel company. Carnegie, on the other hand, wishful to keep all costs down, tried to obtain specially low rates on coke for his firm. This matter eventually brought about the final rupture. Before this happened, however, another source of ill feeling grew out of the failure of the Moore Syndicate to complete the purchase of Carnegie's interest at a price of $157,950,000. For unfortunately the news of this option had been made pub- lic ; and the newspapers of England and America overwhelmed ABSURD NOTORIETY 319 Carnegie with their comments and congratulations, just as though the huge transaction had been completed. When, through the collapse of the money market, the syndicate found itself unable to finance a deal calling for a hundred millions in cash in ninety days, Mr. Carnegie's chagrin was all the greater because of the premature applause to which he had been treated. And his annoyance was very natural. With excessive zeal his friend Stead had rushed a book through the press entitled " Mr. Carnegie's Conundrum : ,40,000,- ooo. What shall I do with it?" and bearing on its title-page the famous Carnegie dictum: "The man who dies rich dies dis- graced ! " Under the circum- ".""" stances it was an anticlimax. Furthermore, an enterprising advertiser of soap or some such detergent placarded England, where Carnegie was then stay- ing, with offers of prizes for the best answer to " Mr. Carnegie's Conundrum " ; and daily reports were published in the newspapers of the thousands of answers re- ceived. The position in which the millionaire philanthropist was thus placed was most undignified. He could not take up a paper without seeing in the form of an advertisement some idiotic suggestion as to how he ought to spend the forty million sterling he had failed to receive. He could not take a walk without the same offensive advice gleaming from a hundred bill-boards ; and supersensitive as he always was to ridicule, his displeasure not unnaturally fell upon the partners whom he regarded as primarily responsible for this absurd notoriety. So when they came to him for an extension of their all-too-short option, he not only refused it, but in contravention of his agree- ' Offensive advice gleaming from bill-boards." 320 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK ment with them, kept the $170,000 which they had contrib- uted as their share of the $1,170,000 paid him as a bonus for Photographic copy of letter from Mr. Carnegie in England to his trustees in Pitts- burg. In his own hand are the words : Of course any part paid by my partners 1 shall refund. the option. Here is a photographic reproduction of a portion of the letter in which he made this agreement. The culmination of these animosities was reached in Octo- THE ALLEGED COKE CONTRACT 321 her, after Mr. Carnegie's return from Europe. It came about in this wise. One day, during the previous spring, Mr. Phipps called on Mr. Carnegie in New York and was greeted with great effusion. " Harry," said Carnegie, " Frick has just left; and I've made a splendid contract for coke. It is a three years' agreement to give us coke at $1.35 a ton." "And if the market price drops below $1.35 ? " queried Mr. Phipps. Mr. Carnegie was surprised. He had not thought of that. A day or two later, when Mr. Phipps called again, he said : "Harry, I've fixed that coke matter. We are to have the same price as others if it drops below $1.35." I.t afterwards turned out that the way he had " fixed " it wat that he had told Lauder to notify Schwab that a clause must be added to the contract, under which the Carnegie Steel Company would pay the same price for coke as any other buyer, provided that price was less than $1.35. " Is that what Mr. Carnegie demands ? " asked Mr. Frick, on receiving the message through Mr. Schwab. " It is," replied the latter. "Then the arrangement is all off, and must betaken up anew." This answer was communicated to Mr. Carnegie ; but he did not mention the matter to Mr. Frick, although he allowed others to give him to understand that he considered the agree- ment as amended by himself binding on the coke company. During the early summer the price of coke was low, and there was no disposition shown by the Carnegies to have the alleged contract enforced; but when prices advanced an at- tempt was made to settle with the Frick Company at $1.35 a ton. Insisting that the coke company had no contract with the steel company, President Lynch had all shipments billed at market rates ; and when Mr. Lawrence Phipps, on behalf of the steel company, refused to pay more than $1.35 a ton, he was 21 322 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK notified that no further orders would be filled until payment for past purchases was made at the rates charged. To remove all doubt as to where the coke company stood, a meeting of the Board of Directors was held on October 25th, 1899, and the fol- lowing resolution was passed : " Resolved, That the president be authorized and instructed to notify the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, that the exist- ence of any contract is denied and that no claim to settle in accordance with the terms of the alleged contract for past, pres- ent or future deliveries of coke to the said Carnegie Steel Com- pany, Limited, will be recognized or entertained by this Com- pany." It was at this critical juncture that a disagreement of a more personal nature occurred between Messrs. Frick and Carnegie, and brought down the tottering fabric of their friendship with a crash that wrought the final trans- formation of the Carnegie Steel Company, alienated lifelong friends, gave the public the secret confi- dences of the corporation, and Pitts- burg a new batch of millionaires. It seemed a little thing to produce such momentous changes; but then, it was only Mrs. O'Leary's cow that set the city At the meeting of the Board of Managers on December nth, 1899, Mr. Schwab made reference to the con- templated purchase by the Carnegie Company of a tract of land situated on the Monongahela River belonging to Mr. Frick; and he mentioned " a hitch in the negotiations." This tract had been'acquired by Mr. Frick in partial exchange of other land ; and Mr. Lawrence Phipps, who was familiar with land values in that neighborhood, had valued it at $4,000 an acre. The land was wanted by the company; and Mr. Frick offered it to the firm at $3,500. As Mr. Schwab remarked at the meeting, "there is AN INSINUATION MET 323 no doubt about our needing this land before long " ; and Mr. Frick had shown his habitual foresight in securing it. For some reason, however, Mr. Carnegie disapproved of the pur- chase after he had sanctioned it; and insinuated that Mr. Frick was making a profit on the transaction. This coming to Mr. Frick's ears, he withdrew his offer. This was the "hitch" to which Mr. Schwab referred. Later fresh troubles arose ; and Mr. Frick sold the land to other parties for half a million dol- lars more than he had asked the Carnegie Steel Company. The insinuation, with its implications, was indignantly re- sented by Mr. Frick. He did not meet the covert attack by a return innuendo, but by an open minute spread upon the rec- ords of the Carnegie Steel Company. This, dated November 2Oth, was as follows : In submitting Mr. Moreland's report, I would like to call attention especially to low prices we are to receive for rails through the greater part of next year almost $8.00 per ton below the present market price, and very little above what old rails for re-melting are selling for. This will seriously affect our labor at Edgar Thomson, which is based on the price we receive for rails. Mr. Carnegie continually referred, while here, to the low prices obtained under sliding scale contracts, entirely ignoring the fact that he alone was to blame for creating the atmosphere in which these sliding scale contracts, and other contracts, were made, by insisting last fall, against the almost unanimous pro- test of his partners, on selling rails far into the future at $16.00 and $17.00 per ton. It was fair for Sales Department to as- sume that if those were his views as to the prices which were to prevail for rails, they should be well satisfied with the much better prices they were themselves obtaining for other products under sliding scale contracts they were then making ; although, it must be said for Mr. Carnegie, that he gave as his reason for wanting such low prices for rails, that it was for the purpose of breaking up eastern Rail Companies. I learn that Mr. Carnegie, while here, stated that I showed cowardice in not bringing up question of price of coke as be- tween Steel and Coke Companies. It was not my business to bring that question up. He is in possession of the Minutes 324 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK of the Board of Directors of the Frick Coke Company, giving their views of the attempt, on his part, to force them to take practically cost for their coke. I will admit that, for the sake of harmony, I did personally agree to accept a low price for coke ; but on my return from that interview in New York (within the next day or two) President Schwab came to me and said that Mr. Lander said the arrangement should provide that, in case we sold coke below the price that Mr. Carnegie and I had discussed, the Steel Company was to have the benefit of such lower price. I then said to Mr. Schwab to let the matter rest until Mr. Carnegie came out (he told us he intended to come), and we would take up the question of a coke contract. He changed his plans, and did not come out. I saw him in New York, before he sailed, and told him that Mr. Lauder had raised that question, and suggested that he write Mr. Schwab, and let Messrs. Schwab and Lynch take up the question of a coke contract. Mr. Schwab, I believe, never heard from him on the subject, and Mr. Lynch, President of the Frick Coke Company, very properly, has been billing the coke, as there was no Arrangement closed, at a price that is certainly quite fair and reasonable as between the two Companies, and at least 20 cents per ton below the average price received from their other cus- tomers. We have By-Laws, and they should govern. If not, why do we have them ? It is the business of the Presidents of the two Companies to make contracts of all kinds. Mr. Car- negie has no authority to make a contract that would bind this Company. Neither have I any authority to make any contract that would bind the Frick Coke Company ; and, at any rate, why should he, whose interest is larger in Steel than it is in Coke, insist on fixing the price which the Steel Company should pay for their coke? The Frick Coke Company has always been used as a convenience. The records will show that its credit has always been largely used for the Steel Com- pany, and is to-day, to the extent of at least $6,000,000.00. The value of our coke properties, for over a year, has been, at every opportunity, depreciated by Mr. Carnegie and Mr. Lau- der, and I submit that it is not unreasonable that I have con- siderable feeling on this subject. He also threatened, I am told, while here, that, if low price did not prevail, or something was not done, that he would buy 20,000 acres of Washington Run coal and build coke ovens. That is to say, he threatened, if the minority stockholders would not give their share of the coke to the Steel Company, at about cost, he would attempt to ruin them. THE FINAL BREAK 325 He also stated, I am told, while here, that he had purchased that land from me above Peters Creek ; that he had agreed to pay market price, although he had his doubts as to whether I had any right, while Chairman of the Board of Managers of the Carnegie Steel Company, to make such a purchase. He knows how I became interested in that land, because I told him in your presence, the other day. Why was he not manly enough to say to my face what he said behind my back? He knew he had no right to say what he did. Now, before the Steel Com- pany becomes the owner of that land, he must apologize for that statement. I first became interested in that land, as I told you, through trading a lot in Shady Side that I had owned for years. The land is six miles away from any land owned by the Carnegie Steel Company. Steel Company does not need it now, and will not need it for a long time in the future, if at all; but, of course, if they owned it, it might keep another large works from being built, or enable Steel Company to go into competition with some other large industry. Harmony is so essential for the success of any organization that I have stood a great many insults from Mr. Carnegie in the past, but I will submit to no further insults in the future. There are many other matters I might refer to, but I have no desire to quarrel with him, or raise trouble in the organiza- tion; but, in justice to myself, I could not at this time, say less than I have. A copy of this was sent in the usual way to Mr. Carnegie in New York. He waited in silence to see if the Board of Managers would approve the minutes at their next meeting; and when they did so he at once came to Pittsburg, called a meeting of the members of the Board, and demanded that they sign a request to Mr. Frick for his resignation. He said he would not use it unless he had to ; but that he wanted to be fortified with it. Armed with this he called upon Mr. Frick, whom he found willing to resign in the interests of harmony. Accordingly the next day Mr. Frick tendered his resignation and it was accepted by the Board. Here are the minutes of the meeting : " At a meeting of the Board of Managers of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, held at the General Offices of the 326 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK Association, Carnegie Building, Pittsburg, Pa., at 12:30 P.M., Tuesday, December 5, 1899, there were present MM. Schwab (president), Peacock, Phipps, Morrison, Clemson, Gayley and Lovejoy (secretary) ; also MM. Andrew Carnegie, Henry Phipps, George Lauder and W. H. Singer. The following communication was read : 'December 5th, 1899. GENTLEMEN : I beg to present my resignation as a member of your Board. Yours very truly, H. C. FRICK. To THE BOARD OF MANAGERS, The Carnegie Steel Co., Ltd., Pittsburgh, Pa.* On motion, (MM. Clemson and Peacock), the resignation was accepted, with the sincere thanks of the Board of Mana- gers, both as such and as representing the Shareholders ; for efficient, zealous and faithful service as a member of this Board from January 14, 1889, to the present day; the vote being unanimous, and all present concurring." The difficult position of the junior partners in this crisis is graphically stated in the following extract from a letter written by Mr. C. M. Schwab, the day before Mr. Carnegie's arrival in Pittsburg : SUNDAY, Dec. 3rd, 1899 ... I just returned from New York this morning. Mr. Carnegie is en-route to Pittsburgh to-day, and will be at the offices in the morning. Nothing could be done with him look- ing towards a reconciliation. He seems most determined. I did my best. So did Mr. Phipps. I feel certain he will give positive instructions to the Board and Stockholders as to his wishes in the matter. I have gone into the matter carefully and am advised by disinterested and good authority that, by reason of his interest, he can regulate this matter to suit him- self with much trouble no doubt, but he can ultimately do so. I believe all the Junior members of the Board and all the Junior Partners will do as he directs. Any concerted action would be JUNIOR PARTNERS FACE RUIN 327 ultimately useless, and result in their downfall. Am satisfied that no action on my part would have any effect in the end. We must declare ourselves. Under these circumstances, there is nothing left for us to do but obey, although the situation the board is thus placed in is most embarrassing. No one can read this letter without sympathizing with Mr. Schwab. On the one hand Carnegie, the majority stockholder, could force him to vote for Frick's expulsion or ruin him if he resisted. On the other hand, Schwab's obligations to Frick and their friendship for years made his subservience to Carne- gie almost impossible. This is undoubtedly what he himself felt ; for he had always freely admitted his great obligations to Mr. Frick. Indeed, he had frankly attributed his success to him. " If I have anything of value in me," he once wrote, Mr. Frick's "method of treatment will bring it out to its full extent " ; and he " regarded with more satisfaction than anything else in life even fortune the consciousness of hav- ing won" Mr. Frick's friendship and regard. It can be- well imagined that it was with great reluctance that he afterwards allowed himself to be forced by Carnegie into active opposi- tion to his chief. With Mr. Frick's resignation from the chairmanship of the Board the dispute seemed ended; Mr. Carnegie returning to New York apparently satisfied. A month or so later, however, he returned to Pittsburg with an elaborate scheme for the com- plete "ejecture" of Mr. Frick. Before describing this, the further course of the coke controversy should be outlined. When Mr. Carnegie was in Pittsburg in December he quietly began to lay his plans for war. His first move was to try to win over Mr. John Walker. Mr. Walker was one of the minority stockholders of the coke company; and as trustee for the minor heirs of his old partner Wilson, he had kept a large part of their fortune in the Frick Coke Company. He was, therefore, doubly interested in the controversy. Mr. Walker's high commercial standing, his 328 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK fine judgment and excellent fighting qualities, made him an ad- versary to be conciliated if possible ; and Mr. Carnegie, during this visit, sought to detach him from Mr. Frick. Some ten years before this, when Mr. Walker was chair- man of Carnegie, Phipps & Co., a personal difference had arisen between him and Carnegie, and he withdrew from the firm. Carnegie now offered him a position on the Board of the steel company and an interest in it, in exchange for his hold- ings in the coke company. As this involved abandoning his friend Frick in a fight which the latter had entered into to safe- guard the interest of all minority stockholders, including his own and those of the widow and orphans of Carnegie's old boy companion for Wilson was one of The Original Six Mr. Walker declined the offer. He thereby failed to make several millions of dollars which would otherwise have been his. It afterwards transpired, however, that Mr. Walker had been mistaken in supposing that Mr. Carnegie wished to sacrifice the interests of all the minority stockholders in the coke com- pany. For at this time Mr. Carnegie told Mr. Schwab to quietly notify Mr. Walker that if he would withdraw his opposition to the coke contract, the matter would be so arranged that he and those he represented should receive the same profits from their coke investments as they would if the steel company paid full price for its fuel. Mr. Schwab, however, did not dare himself to make such an offer to a man like Mr. Walker; and he asked another member of the Board of Managers to do it. This gen- tleman also declined, as did every other member of the Board to whom the matter was submitted ; and Mr. Walker lost the opportunity of declining the bribe. And if he reads this book he will probably learn for the first time of Mr. Carnegie's benevolent intentions. Failing thus to win Mr. Walker to his side Mr. Carnegie promptly included him in the fight, which he now carried right into his adversary's camp. It will be remembered that the majority a little more than AN AMAZING CONTRACT 329 half of the coke company's stock belonged to Carnegie and / the steel company. On the 9th of the following January (1900) the usual stockholders' meeting was held; and, by the power afforded by their large holdings, the Carnegies increased the Board of Directors from five to seven, dropped Messrs. John Walker and Giles B. Bosworth from the Board, and elected to the directorate six of the managers of the steel company. Four of these, Messrs. Gayley, Moreland, Clemson, and Morrison, had not previously been stockholders ; but to qualify them to serve as directors, each had now five shares put in his name. The others were Lauder, Lynch, and Frick. On January 24th the majority in the new Board voted to the Carnegie Steel Company a contract for all the coke, at $1.35 a -- ton, that that company could use in its furnaces for five years, commencing January ist, 1899, amounting approximately to 2,500,000 tons a year, or about one-third of the entire product of the H. C. Frick Coke Company; and this agreement, pre- - viously prepared and executed by the Carnegie Steel Company, was signed by Mr. Lynch, president of the coke company, under ' his own protest and that of Mr. Frick. The market price of coke was then $3.50 a ton. This surprising contract, being made retroactive, required < the coke company to refund to the Carnegies a sum of $596,000 paid on account of coke sold during the previous year. The further loss to the coke company at prevailing prices was $1.65 a ton, or something like $4,000,000 a year. This is probably the most astonishing thing that ever happened / in the course of the Carnegie Steel Company's amazing history. As soon as the minority stockholders heard of these pro- ceedings they sent the following protest to the president and Board of Directors of the H. C. Frick Coke Company, and re- ceived the appended reply : GENTLEMEN : I have been informed that your Board of Di- rectors on Jan. 24th, 1900, passed a resolution intended to ratify an alleged contract with the Carnegie Steel Company, Ltd., 330 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK whereby your company is to supply to the latter all the coke it may require for use in its furnaces for five years, commencing Jan. i, 1899, for $1.35 per ton, delivered on cars at your works, and that your company has signed a written memorandum of such contract. As a stockholder in your company, I protest against any such contract, and I demand that you do nothing in recognition thereof, and especially that you do not ship or bill any coke to the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, thereunder; and that you do not settle with said company for coke shipped to it since Jan. ist, 1899, at the price named in said contract, or at any price other than the market price at the time of delivery. I deny that such contract was ever made until you attempted to do so on Jan. 24th, 1900. This contract is for many reasons unfair and fraudulent and against the minority stockholders of the H. C. Frick Coke Company. It is made by those who represent the majority of stockholders, really in the interest of such majority, as against the interests of the H. C. Frick Coke Company and the minority stockholders therein. The market price of coke on Jan. 24th, 1900, was at least $3.50 per ton, and yet this contract, covering almost one-third of all coke manufac- tured by the company, fixes a price of $1.35 per ton. In many other respects it unfairly and dishonestly favors the majority stockholders of the coke company to the loss of the minority stockholders. The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and Andrew Car- negie (who owns more than one-half of the interest in the steel company) own together more than one-half of the stock of the H. C. Frick Coke Company. A majority of the present Board of Directors of the coke company are managers and partners in the Carnegie Steel Company. It was this majority who forced this contract in favor of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, on Jan. 24th, 1900. I demand that you rescind the said action of your board in favor of said contract; that you take such further action as may be necessary to rescind and annul said contract. If you refuse to act, then I ask that you call a meeting of the stock- holders of the coke company to take action and pass upon the questions herein raised, and upon the requests I now make. Please advise me promptly what your company proposes to do in the matter, as it is my intention to take proper legal steps to prevent your so doing, if you intend carrying out such pre- tended contract. Yours truly, S. L. SCHOONMAKER. DISINTERMENT OF THE IRONCLAD 331 PITTSBURGH, Feb. 6th, 1900. Mr. S. L. Schoonmaker, New York City. MY DEAR SIR : I beg to advise that I received your com- munication of i st instant, addressed to the President and Board of Directors of the H. C. Frick Coke Company, and I sub- mitted the same to the Board at a meeting held Feb. 6th, 1900, when the following motion was adopted : ' That the President be instructed to carry out the contract between the H. C. Frick Coke Company and The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, dated January ist, 1899, an d all its terms and provisions, and that he inform Messrs. Walker and Schoonmaker that he is so directed by the Board. ' Very Truly Yours, THOS. LYNCH, President. Thereupon suit was brought by Mr. Walker and the other minority stockholders to enjoin the coke company from selling, shipping, and delivering any coke to the steel company under the pretended contract. In the mean time important events were happening in the council-chambers of the steel company. The peaceful accept- ance of Mr. Frick's resignation as chairman of the Board proved but a lull in the storm. In New York Mr. Carnegie was devis- ' ing a plan for the rehabilitation of an extinct iron-clad agree- ment, so as to make it applicable to the new situation. Then, in January, he returned to Pittsburg, called a meeting of the Managers, and had them go through the ritual he had prepared. At one of their interviews about this time Mr. Frick had offered to sell his interest in the company to Mr. Carnegie at a price to be fixed by arbitrators. This being refused, he offered to buy Carnegie's on the same terms. Mr. Carnegie gasped with astonishment. It was the most direct challenge of his supremacy which he had ever received. The proceedings of the Managers, under Carnegie's direction, now contemplated the forcible seizure of the Frick interest at book values. How 332 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK inadequate these were will be seen from the following state- ment of some of them, side by side with the profits made dur- ing the previous year : Book value, Net profit, 1899- Nov. ist, 1899. Edgar Thomson Furnaces $3,829,716.68 \ SteelWorks 614,518.51 J- $10,258,703.98 " Foundry 370,866.80) Duquesne Blast Furnaces 2,983,094. 79 5,089,967. 52 SteelWorks 1,104,728.39 2,057,745.83 Homestead Steel Works 4,564,413.63 11,909,199.55 Carrie Furnaces 820,638.65 829,625.42 Lucy Furnaces 1,303, 524-37 1,251,869.99 Keystone Bridge W T orks 13,682.68 7*7,776.49 Upper Union Mills 1,091,857.88 1,000,000.00 Lower Union Mills 438,052.03 700,000.00 Scotia Ore Mines 1,695-74 Larimer Coke Works 17,276.56 Youghiogheny Coke Works (loss) 35. 73 Sundries including H. C. Frick Coke Company $1,253,853 Oliver Iron Mining 1,067,000 Carnegie Natural Gas 420,000 Union Railroad 100,000 Etc., etc 3,845,949-36 Borrowed from Contingency Fund 50,570.80 Net earnings for year $21,000,000.00 While the Board was still in session Mr. Carnegie went out to see Mr. Frick, to demand his stock at these book values. Mr. Frick, who had remained outwardly unmoved amid all the horrors of the Homestead battle and cool in presence of the assassin, felt outraged by the intrusion of Andrew Carnegie on such a mission; and his anger burst out like a flame. Carne- gie hastily retreated, and returned to the Board room white with emotion; and later, when the affair came into the courts, he made an affidavit charging Mr. Frick with an ungovernable temper. The further course of this affair, in which, at the instigation of Mr. Carnegie, all the partners except Messrs. Hy. Phipps, Love joy, and Curry joined, is summarized in Appendix A from Mr. Prick's own narrative, which formed part of a bill in equity filed in the Court of Common Pleas a month or so later. The SENSATIONAL REVELATIONS 333 revelations of the stupendous profits of the steel industry con- tained in this plea set the country agog, so that interest in the contest itself became almost secondary. Every newspaper in the land printed long extracts from the pleadings ; and columns of comments were published on the amazing exhibition of in- dustrial efficiency thus presented. Had the Moore option been valid at this time there would have been no difficulty in raising a hundred million dollars. In other lands the litigation and the secrets it revealed attracted the same general attention. Everywhere the hope was expressed that the suit would be allowed to reach the courts. It was pointed out that " what legis- lative bodies and committees of inquiry had failed to accomplish might be reached if the secrets of the great corporation were passed in review through the courts " ; and it .was not only sensa- tion-loving and curiosity-seeking people who wanted to know more, but legislators and publicists of every kind. The Carnegie answer was filed on March I2th. It claimed that the plan for forming the limited partnership, which Frick had declared to be a general one, was devised by Frick himself, and that he acquired much of his interest through the working of the so-called iron- clad agreement. It was denied that on December 3ist, 1899, tne association had assets or property, which in its legal capacity it could transfer, worth $250,000,- ooo. While it was admitted that Mr. Frick proved a valuable member to the company, it was asserted that " notwithstanding his ability " he " is a man of imperious temper, impatient of opposition, and disposed to make a personal matter of every difference of opinion, even on questions of mere business policy. At times, moreover, he gives way to violent outbursts of passion, which he is either unwilling or unable to control. He demands absolute power and without it is not satisfied. " The answer maintained that the refusal to submit their differences to arbitration was because the company pro- posed at all times to maintain the integrity of the iron-clad contract. 334 ATTEMPT TO DEPOSE FRICK There were no disclosures, however. The Carnegies had had more than enough of them ; and even while this answer was being prepared efforts were made to stop the litigation. With a studied display of indifference the principal Carnegie officials absented themselves on alleged vacations; but their movements were conducted with method. Andrew Carnegie went golfing in Florida, but stopped in Washington long enough to transmit through Mr. Lawrence Phipps the first overture for TRAVELING- IN tOROPft HURR.V TO "RETURN. THE GREAT SHERIFFS PUZZLE How .to find Carnegie and his forty, partners. From a Pittsburg paper. peace. The terms accompanying this were refused and others suggested; and these in turn were rejected by Carnegie. This rejection resulted in Mr. Prick's obtaining sixty per cent, more in the final settlement than he otherwise would have had. Then Mr. Hy. Phipps took a hand in the negotiations ; and, hav- ing previously reached an understanding with Mr. Carnegie, he had little difficulty in winning the adhesion of Messrs. Frick, Lovejoy, and Walker to a scheme of consolidation and reorgani- zation that should safeguard the interests of all and restore an SHOWERS OF GOLD 335 outward semblance of peace to the association. Five days after the filing of the Carnegie answer a peace conference met at At- lantic City, when the Carnegie Steel Company underwent the last metamorphosis before its final absorption in the United States Steel Corporation, and dollars began to rain down upon the partners faster than they could count them. CHAPTER XXI THE FAILURE OF THE IRON-CLAD THE settlement of this historic litiation out of court before any evidence was taken left the public in doubt as to the legal value of the document known as the iron-clad agreement. As this agreement had an important influence on the history of the several Carnegie organizations, some account of it and its failure to work the ejecture " of Mr. Frick is called for in this narrative ; especially as it is not likely that any frank statement concerning it will ever be made elsewhere. In 1884 the practice was inaugurated of rewarding excep- tional services of employees by crediting them with an interest in the association; Messrs. Curry, Moore, Borntraeger, and Abbot being the first to receive this favor. The book value of the interests thus assigned was charged against recipients ; and the shares were held by the company as security until the indebtedness had been paid off. Usually the profits alone sufficed to liquidate the debt. During the next three years other employees were similarly rewarded ; and to meet this new condition of debtor partners a plan of automatic ejecture was devised, so that no junior part- ner need be kept in the association any longer than his favor lasted. This was the iron-clad agreement of 1887. It was an excellent device; for while serving as an incentive to further efforts, such a revokable interest also kept the " young geniuses " 336 AN ENGINE OF OPPRESSION 337 in a properly humble frame of mind. But there was no thought of applying this iron-clad to the other partners, whose interests were paid up. That was an afterthought. In 1892, on the consolidation of the several companies, a new iron-clad agreement was drawn up. Concerning this docu- ment Mr. Henry Phipps afterwards made the following state- ment : " When the consolidation papers were agreed to by Mr. Carnegie and me, at his place near Windsor, England, in 1892, it was understood that the ' Iron-clad ' should only apply to debtor partners, or employees, which was the intent of the paper of 1887. Of course much was left to the honor of the Managers, who were then, and in whom it was not unreasonable for me to impose implicit confidence. Never has it been used, to my knowledge, and I am confident the agreement would never have been made an engine of oppression and robbery. This information was again vouchsafed me when I signed a paper relating to my death, and Carnegie said this was only to apply to debtor partners, or employees, which was the intent of the paper of 1887. ' But,' I replied, ' there are clauses in the agreement that are unjust/ and he replied, ' Harry, I am ill, and am going abroad, and fix it to your satisfaction. ' On such a promise, so clear and explicit, I would have done anything for my friend, and especially in his condition. I am very sorry to say that since then he has shown no willingness to correct the agreement as promised." In apparent conformity with this understanding, limiting its application to debtor partners, this iron-clad of 1892 was not signed by Messrs. Carnegie, Phipps, and Lauder. Most of the other partners signed it, but not all. Under its terms some interests of deceased or retiring members were bought by the company; but no "ejecture" took place. In 1897 a new and more stringent agreement was drawn up, intended to reach other than debtor partners ; and this was signed by Andrew Carnegie and sent from abroad on October 3d, with a letter to the Board of Managers, saying: " I have signed the paper making these corrections, because 22 338 THE FAILURE OF THE IRON-CLAD I wished you to have something that will keep the Firm right so far as my interest is concerned ; but, of course, you will get all the signatures upon one corrected paper, by and by. " This, however, was never done. Andrew Carnegie's was the only signature ever appended to this document. Concern- ing it Mr. Phipps wrote on October 4th from London : " Please inform the Chairman, President and Board of Mana- gers that I refuse to sign the ' Iron-clad ' or any paper of a simi- lar character, and that I shall resist the buying of the Com- pany's Stock as the proposed Agreement contemplates, and thereby creating liabilities of which we have quite sufficient. Any business man will admit, and no one will deny, that such debts are foreign to the purpose for which o'ur Company was formed. Better new capital than no capital, which would be the position in which we would be in if any such project were con- summated. Besides the act would be clearly illegal. For these and other good reasons, I beg that no action in the matter be taken." So the attempt to extend the provisions of the iron-clad failed, and the situation remained as before. A futile effort was afterwards made to reach a provisional agreement ; and nothing more was attempted until Mr. Carne- gie tried to secure the " ejecture " of Mr. Frick. This he sought to accomplish in an original and ingenious way. Having secured the resignation of Mr. Frick from the chairmanship of the company, Mr. Carnegie appeared before the Board of Mana- gers on January 8th, 1900, and offered and had passed the following resolution : " Whereas, as appears by the Minutes of October 19, 1897, a proposed Supplemental Agreement, dated September i, 1897, to the original Agreement, appearing in the Minutes of January 18, 1887, was signed by Andrew Carnegie, condi- tioned upon all members signing the same, but was objected to by Henry Phipps, who refused to sign the same ; and conse- quently, that it has not been signed by several other members of the firm, and is, therefore, of none effect; Now, therefore, be it INTERESTING RITUAL 339 Resolved : That the Resolution of October 19, 1897, ap- proving said Supplemental Agreement, passed in the hope that Mr. Phipps would upon reflection withdraw his opposition and all members sign, is hereby rescinded ; and the Board decides that no further steps be taken with the proposed Supplement, thus leaving the original Agreements in full force. " The minutes then relate that " Without a motion, the Secretary was directed to obtain to the Supplemental 'Iron-clad Agreement,' dated July i, 1892, the signatures of the present members of this Association who have not signed the same, it having not been presented for signa- ture to the members admitted while the aforesaid Supplemental Agreement of September i, 1897, was being drawn up, consid- ered, revised and after its adoption. " In other words, by expunging a minute on the books of the Carnegie Steel Company, it was sought to revive an agreement made thirteen years before by the members of an entirely differ- ent corporation, Carnegie Brothers & Co. Then an attempt was made to graft onto this Carnegie Brothers' agreement "a supplemental iron-clad" of the Carnegie Steel Company eight years old, which had never been signed by the principal owners. To make this double-decked instrument effective, there were now added the signatures of Carnegie himself and of some members who had no existence at the time the agreement was signed by Mr. Frick, against whom all this ingenuity was directed. And it was on these proceedings that the Carnegie Steel Company rested its case against Henry C. Frick in the greatest lawsuit ever commenced in the State of Pennsylvania. The document itself, called "the Supplemental Iron-clad" for the first time in the minutes of the meeting of January 8th, 1900, reads as follows : This agreement, Made this first day of July, A.D., 1892, and on certain dates thereafter, as shown, between The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, party of the first part, and each one 340 THE FAILURE OF THE IRON-CLAD of the members of that Association who has hereunto affixed his name, party of the second part, witnesseth : (I) That the party of the second part, for and in consider- ation of the execution and delivery of this agreement by each of the other active members of said Association, The Car- negie Steel Company, Limited, and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar in hand paid by the party of the first part, the receipt whereof, by the signing hereof, is hereby acknowledged, as well as for other good and valuable considerations, to him moving, does hereby covenant, promise and agree to and with the party of the first part, that he, the party of the second part, at any time hereafter when three-fourths in number of the per- sons holding interests in said first party, and three-fourths in value of said interests, shall request him, the said party of the second part, so to do, will sell, assign and transfer to said first party, or to such person or persons as it shall designate, all of his, the said party of the second part, interest in the Limited partnership of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. The interest shall be assigned freed from all liens and encumbrances or contracts of any kind, and this transfer shall at once termi- nate all the interest of said party of the second part in and in connection with said The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. (II) The request of the requisite number of members and value of interests shall be evidenced by a writing signed by them or their proper Agents or Attorneys in Fact ; and a copy thereof shall be either served upon the party whose interest it is proposed to buy, or mailed to him at his post office address ; at least five (5) days before the day fixed in said request to make said transfer and assignment. (III) The party of the first part covenants and agrees that it will pay unto the party so selling and assigning, the value of the interest assigned, as it shall appear to be on the books of said The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, on the first day of the month following said assignment. Said payment shall be in manner as follows : If the interest assigned shall not exceed two (2) per centum of the Capital Stock at par, the same shall be paid for as follows : One-fourth cash within ninety (90) days of the date of the assignment, and the balance in two equal annual payments from the date of the assignment, to be evidenced by the notes of said first party. If the interest assigned shall exceed two (2) per centum, but shall not exceed four (4) per centum of the Capital Stock at par, then the same shall be paid for as follows : One-fourth THE DOCUMENT QUOTED 341 cash in six months after the date of the assignment, and the balance in three equal annual payments from the date of the assignment, to be evidenced by the notes of the said first party. If the interest assigned shall exceed four (4) per centum, but shall not exceed twenty (20) per centum of the Capital Stock at par, then the same shall be paid for as follows : One- fourth cash within six months after the date of the assignment, and ttje balance in five equal annual payments from the date of the assignment, to be evidenced by the notes of said first party. If the interest assigned shall exceed twenty (20) per centum of the Capital Stock at par, then the same shall be paid for as follows: One-fourth cash within eight months from the date of the assignment, and the balance in ten equal annual payments from the date of the assignment, to be evidenced by the notes of said first party. All deferred payments shall bear interest at six per centum per annum, payable semi-annually. (IV) This agreement, and the option the party of the second part hereby gives to the party of the first part, is hereby de- clared to be irrevocable, and that it may be carried out in good faith, and notwithstanding any effort on the part of the party of the second part to evade it, the party of the second part does hereby appoint the person, who, at the time when he is called upon to act, is Chairman of the party of the first part, the At- torney in Fact for said party of the second part, for him and in his name, place and stead to assign and transfer the said inter- est in said The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, whenever under this agreement it would be the duty of said party of the second part so to do. This appointment is also irrevocable; is coupled with the interest of said party of the second part in said The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and will justify and warrant the said Attorney in Fact to act for the said party of the second part in the premises just as efficaciously after the death of said party of the second part, or after said party of the second part has attempted to revoke this power of attorney or evade his agree- ment, as if said party of the second part were alive and living up to it in entire good faith. (V) Death shall not revoke, alter or impair any of the terms of this contract, but the first party shall, after the death of the party of the second part, have the following time to elect to buy his interest on the terms hereinbefore set out : If the interest does not exceed four (4) per centum, four months. 342 THE FAILURE OF THE IRON-CLAD If the interest exceeds four (4) per centum, but does not ex- ceed twenty (20) per centum, eight months. If the interest exceeds twenty (20) per centum, twelve months, and the said party of the second part to this agreement does hereby direct his personal representatives, after the death of him, the said party of the second part, to approve, join in and perfect any transfer his said Attorney in Fact may make, and the said Executor or Executors or Administrator or Adminis- trators of the party of the second part shall carry out this con- tract, and all its provisions, just as if said representatives had themselves made this agreement. (VI) This agreement is hereby declared to be a lien and encumbrance upon the interest of said party of the second part in said The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. No attempt of the said party of the second part voluntarily to sell, pledge or mortgage, and no proceedings adversely against the said party of the second part by execution, process of law, or Equity of any kind, bankruptcy or insolvency, shall in any way, shape or form affect, impair or alter this agreement, or any part of it, or take from under its operation the respective interest of said party of the second part from the clog hereof. Both the parties hereto agree and declare that it is the set- tled policy of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and of the party of the second part, in entire good faith, and with all effort on our part to carry out its true spirit and meaning, this agreement ; being satisfied that if we do so, it will be greatly to the benefit of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and to the party of the second part as a member thereof; and that any effort on the part of said party of the second part to evade any of the provisions of the same will most properly prove his unfitness to be connected with said The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. In witness whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto set its common seal, attested by the signatures of its Chairman and Secretary, and approved by two of its Managers; and the party of the second part has hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above given. THE CARNEGIE COMPANY, LIMITED, By H. C. FRICK, Chairman. Attest : Approved : (SEAL) F. T. F. LOVEJOY, J. G. A. LEISHMAN, Secretary. Manager. F. T. F. LOVEJOY, Manager. THE NOTICE OF " EJECTURE " 343 Then follow a number of signatures, some made " on the day and year first above given," namely, July ist, 1892, and others, including Andrew Carnegie's, nearly eight years later. On the strength of this agreement the following notice was now served on Mr. Frick, Mr. Schwab having been delegated by Mr. Carnegie to obtain signatures to it : " Under the provisions of a certain Agreement between The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the partners composing it, known as and generally referred to as the 'Iron Clad' Agreement, we, the undersigned, being three-fourths in num- ber of the persons holding interests in said Association, and three-fourths in value of said interests, do now hereby request Henry C. Frick to sell, assign and transfer to The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, all of his interest in the capital of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, said transfer to be made as at the close of business January 31, 1900, and to be paid for as provided in said Agreement. Done at Pittsburg, Pa., this loth and I ith days of January, 1900. C. M. SCHWAB. ANDREW CARNEGIE. GIBSON D. PACKER. GEO. LAUDER. D. G. KERR. A. M. MORELAND. H. E. TENER, JR. JAMES GAYLEY. A. C. CASE. D. M. CLEMSON. JNO. McLEOD. THOS. MORRISON. LEWIS T. BROWN. L. C. PHIPPS. GEO. E. McCAGUE. CHAS. L. TAYLOR. W. B. DJCKSON. JNO. C. FLEMING. E. F. WOOD. W. W. BLACKBURN. GEO. MEGREW. H. P. BOPE. J. E. SCHWAB. JAMES SCOTT. HOMER J. LINDSAY. W. H. SINGER. ALEXR. R. PEACOCK. W. E. COREY. MlLLARD HUNSIKER, GEO. H. WlGHTMAN. per C. M. SCHWAB, J. OGDEN HOFFMAN. (Power Attorney). CHAS. W. BAKER. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Original now in file in this office. This 1 5th day of January, 1900. F. T. F. LOVEJOY, Secretary." 344 THE FAILURE OF THE I RON- CLAD It will be noticed that Mr. Lovejoy simply signed it in his official character as secretary of the company. Mr. Curry was on his death-bed ; but he was asked to sign it and refused. " Mr. Frick is my friend," said Mr. Curry. " And am I not also your friend? " Mr. Carnegie asked. "Yes; but Mr. Frick has never humiliated me," was the pathetic answer of the dying man. Mr. Henry Phipps not only refused to sign the demand, but joined Mr. Frick in protesting against the action of the Board. These protests are as follows : To THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY, LIMITED : I have read a copy of the minutes of the Board of Managers of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, dated January 8th, 1900, handed to me Friday afternoon, January I2th, 1900, and I desire particularly to call your attention to certain actions of the Board regarding the so-called agreements as to partners' interests, dated 1887, 1892 and 1897; I dissent from some of the statements of alleged facts therein contained, and I, certainly, do not agree, but object to and deny, that the said action of the Board of Managers on January 8th, 1900, and, indeed, any action of the Board of Managers, could or did re-instate the so-called agreement of 1887. As I have heretofore stated, I am opposed and object to any attempt not only to force from any partner his interest in our Company, but, also, to the right of our Company to use its capital in the purchase of any such interest. HENRY PHIPPS, JR. PITTSBURGH, January 15, 1900. To THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY, LIMITED. On Friday evening, January I2th, 1900, for the first time I learned that the Board of Managers of your Company secretly and without notice to me, at a meeting on Monday, January 8th, 1900, passed a resolution offered by Andrew Carnegie, rescinding a former resolution of October igth, 1897, touching the agreement of September 1st, 1897, and at the same time your Secretary was directed to procure the signatures of the present members of the association who had not signed the same to what is now for the first time in your minutes called " the Supplemental Iron Clad agreement dated July ist, 1892." SEIZURE OF THE PRICK INTEREST 345 This is to notify you that all the said action on January 8th, 1900, was taken without my knowledge or consent and I do hereby protest against and object to the same. In some re- spects the recitals or statements therein contained are untrue in fact. The action did not and could not as the resolution as- serts, re-instate the so-called agreement of 1887. At the in- stigation of Andrew Carnegie you now speciously seek without my knowledge or consent and after a serious personal disagree- ment between Mr. Carnegie and myself, and by proceedings purposely kept secret from me to make a contract for me under which Mr. Carnegie thinks he can unfairly take from me my interest in The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. Such pro- ceedings are illegal and fraudulent as against me, and I now give you formal notice that I will hold all persons pretending to act thereunder liable for the same. H. C. FRTCK. PITTSBURGH, January I3th, 1900. No attention was paid to these protests, and on February 1st the following letter was sent to Mr. Frick : THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY, LIMITED, General Offices; Carnegie Building, PITTSBURG, PA., February 1st, 1900. Mr. H. C. Frick, Bid I ding. DEAR SIR : I beg to advise you that pursuant to the terms of the so called " Iron Clad Agreement " and at the request of the Board of Managers, I have to-day acting as your attorney in fact executed and delivered to The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, a transfer of your interest in the capital of said Com- pany. Yours truly, C. M. SCHWAB. Such is the interesting story of the famous iron-clad agree- ment, and Mr. Carnegie's attempt to use it for the "ejecture" of Mr. Frick. CHAPTER XXII THE ATLANTIC CITY COMPROMISE ,!***** ONE of the junior members of the Carnegie Steel Company, recently speaking of these events, un- consciously adopted the circus simile used by one of a former generation of partners, else- where quoted, in explanation of the apparent willingness with which he and his col- leagues joined Carnegie in the effort to depose Frick. " We were simply a band of circus horses," he said, "and we all jumped as the ring-master cracked his whip." Although several of the junior partners protested at a secret meeting, only one of the well-trained band, besides Curry, openly shied and refused to jump at the crack of the ring-master's whip. This was Secretary Lovejoy. Entering the Carnegie employ in 1881 as a telegraph operator, he had won his partner- ship through his unusual ability as an accountant; and for many years he had filled the responsible office of secretary to the entire satisfaction of his seniors. In particular he had won the confidence of Mr. Frick ; and during the Homestead strike had ably served as the chairman's chief assistant. Frankly ad- mitting his obligations to Mr. Frick, he took a unique position in the fight; and refused to be cajoled or threatened away from the side of his chief. He and Curry were the only ones of the thirty odd "young geniuses " to openly deny that a majority of shares necessarily carried with it a surplus of wisdom and 6 FRANCIS T. F. LOVEJOY LOVEJOY'S INDEPENDENCE 347 equity. He also accentuated his isolation by filing a separate answer in the Equity Suit, in which he advanced in terse phrase- ology an original argument against the validity of his colleagues' acts. The independence thus shown by Mr. Lovejoy greatly facili- tated an amicable adjustment of the difficulty; for Andrew Carnegie refused to treat with Frick in any way, and it be- came necessary for the latter to find some one to represent him who had the ability to cope with the combined forces of his opponents. From this difficult position Lovejoy emerged with credit. The first peace conference was held at Andrew Carnegie's residence in New York on Saturday, March i/th, 1900. It was attended by Messrs. Carnegie, Henry Phipps, Schwab, and Lovejoy. The long-talked-of consolidation of the Carnegie and Frick companies was now finally agreed upon; and the pre- liminaries settled for a compromise of the personal differences of the leading partners. Fearing that the newspapers would suspect what was going on if the whole Board of Managers sud- denly appeared in New York, it was arranged to continue the conference on Monday at Atlantic City; and Carnegie tele- graphed to Pittsburg, telling the members of the Board to leave on Sunday night for the New Jersey resort. To disarm sus- picion they were instructed to take their wives with them. Mr. Frick had remained in Pittsburg; but he was kept in- formed of the progress of the negotiations over the telephone by Mr. Lovejoy. He was satisfied with the plans outlined, provided no details inimical to his interests were introduced; and Lovejoy spent most of the night drafting the agreement. On Monday this agreement was read to the assembled board at Atlantic City. In general it was acceptable to Carnegie and his adherents ; but one clause provoked bitter opposition and jeopardized the whole plan. It appeared that Carnegie had registered a vow never to recognize Frick as a partner; and to maintain his consistency he demanded that Frick's interest 343 THE ATLANTIC CITY COMPROMISE should not be given direct to him, but through the hands of a trustee. This was the only thing in the agreement that was productive of discord; and concerning it Carnegie displayed such heat ancl persistence that Lovejoy, rather than imperil the settlement, conceded the point. The next day the amended agreement was adopted; and just as the last signatures were being affixed Mr. James B. Dill arrived by special train from New York to draw up the new company's charter. The same afternoon the conference ended ; and Schwab celebrated the conclusion of peace by a banquet at the Bellevue Hotel, Philadelphia, which he had ordered by telegraph. The agreement thus reached reads as follows : MM. Schwab, Carnegie, L. C. Phipps, Morrison, Clemson, Gayley and Moreland, representing The Carnegie Steel Com- pany, Limited, and Henry Phipps, representing John Walker and others of the H. C. Frick Coke Company, agree as follows : All the business of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the H. C. Frick Coke Company to be merged substantially as shown in paper "A " of June 3rd, 1899, attached hereto, ad- justments to be made up to April 1st, 1900, which will bring the two concerns into the same relative positions as to book- values as they occupied April 1st, 1899. In the matter of the dispute between the two companies as to prices of coke, neither party shall be held to be right or wrong, both shall be considered equally so, therefore the differ- ence will be split in two, each party yielding one-half of its claim. ANDREW CARNEGIE. HENRY PHIPPS. F. T. F. LOVEJOY. C. M. SCHWAB. Witness: JAS. BERTRAM. L. C. PHIPPS. THOS. MORRISON. JAMES GAYLEY. D. M. CLEMSON. A. M. MORELAND. The same parties representing The Carnegie Steel Com- pany, Limited, and F. T. F. Lovejoy representing H. C. Frick, under full authority so to do, agree as follows : TREATY OF PEACE 349 The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, will hand over to said Lovejoy Six per cent of the Stocks and Securities it ob- tains under this merger, said Lovejoy to receipt for the same in full of all claims of said Frick against the Company or any of its members. To this receipt the signature of H.-C. Frick will also be appended, and H. C. Frick will thereupon withdraw his suit against the Company. Meanwhile all legal proceedings to remain in statu quo. The Committee to carry out the details of this Agreement is to consist of C. M. Schwab, G. D. Packer, F. T. F. Lovejoy and A. M. Moreland, who shall act by unanimous consent, but that failing, all differences if any will be referred to Judge J. H. Reed, whose decision shall be final. The plans for carrying out this Agreement are more fully set forth in paper marked " B " herewith appended and made part of this Agreement. We, the undersigned, pledge ourselves to carry out the spirit of this agreement in good faith and with every desire to bring it to a successful conclusion. L. C. PHIPPS. THOS. MORRISON. JAMES GAYLEY. D. M. CLEMSON. Witness : JAS. BERTRAM. F. T. F. LOVEJOY. A. M. MORELAND. ANDREW CARNEGIE. H. PHIPPS. C. M. SCHWAB. STATEMENT "A," SHOWING ACCOUNTS OF STOCKHOLDERS IN THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY, LIMITED, AND THE H. C. FRICK COKE COMPANY, AFTER THE ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN OPTIONS ON THE STOCKS, GIVEN APRIL 24, 1899. Stockholders Personal Account. Value of C. S. Co., Value of H. C. F. C. C. S. Co., Ltd. Ltd. Stock. Co. Stock. Andrew Carnegie, Cr. $4,025,055.76 $146,250,000.00 $30,039,898.09 Henry Phipps, Cr. 151,092.98 27,500,000.00 7,652,354.74 H. C. Frick, Cr. 50,911.89 15,000,000.00 16,604,529.50 George Lauder, Cr. 107,487.38 IO,OOO,OOO.OO 1,187,237.97 C. M. Schwab, Dr. 1,168,024.90 7,500,000.00 618,575.66 \V. H. Singer, Cr. 358,916.61 5,000,000.00 773,031.18 H. M. Curry, Dr. 81,486.59 5,000,000.00 771,183.88 L. C. Phipps, Dr. 656,173.70 5,000,000.00 412,627.36 A. R. Peacock, Dr. 726,017.98 5,000,000.00 412,259.46 F. T. F. Lovejoy, Dr. 110,593.76 1,666,666.67 138,029.63 Thos. Morrison, Dr. 185,067.94 1,666,666.67 137,843.16 Ceo. IT. Wightman, Dr. 248,119.44 1,666,666.67 137,661.73 350 THE ATLANTIC CITY COMPROMISE Stockholders. D. M. Clemson, James Gayley, A. M. Moreland. Chas. L. Taylor, A. R. Whitney, W. W. Blackburn, Jno. C. Fleming, J. Ogden Hoffman, Milld. Hunsiker, Geo. E. McCague, James Scott, H. P. Bope, W. E. Corey, Jos. E. Schwab, L. T. Brown, D. G. Kerr, H. J. Lindsay, E. F. Wood, H. E. Tener, Jr., Geo. Megrew, G. D. Packer, W. B. Dickson, A. C. Case, John McLeod, Chas. W. Baker, Undivided, Mrs. L. C. Carnegie John Walker Thomas Lynch Vandervort Estate. . , Borntraeger Estate . . G. B. Bosworth J. G. A. Leishman. , Robt. Ramsay , John Pontefract S. L. Schoonmaker . . Mrs. C. A. Wilson . . Miss H. R. Wilson . John Walker, Gdn. . . Miss C. B. Wilson . . JohnT. Wilson Miss E. C. Wilson. , Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Personal Account. C. S. Co.. Ltd. $258,754.79 186,619.70 233,044.75 96,982.26 Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Cr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. 29,091.29 23,510.01 62,231.06 94,791.77 108,797.58 106,888.16 13,285.95 MO.577.43 176,301.22 107,002.79 43,197.23 43,197.23 48,690.11 48,690.11 48,690.11 48,690.11 63,805.55 63,805.55 63,805.55 63,805.55 271,731.30 Value of C.S. Co., Ltd. Stock. $1,666,666.6; 1,527,777.78 1,527,777.78 I,25O,OOO.OO 1,250,000.00 833,333.33 833,333.33 833,333.33 833,333.33 833,333-33 833,333.33 277,777.78 833,333.33 833,333.33 555,555-55 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.78 277,777.77 I,25O,OOO.OO Value of H. C. F. C. Co. Stock. $137,661.73 126,401.58 126,220.15 103,337-01 102,974.15 69,012.29 69,012.29 69,012.29 69,012 29 69,012.29 69,012.29 22,883.14 68,649.43 68,649.43 45,766.29 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 22,883.14 102,974.24 5,0l8,026.8l 1,434,398.29 640,794.18 521,794.83 360,103.45 355,497.51 360,085.87 194,355.37 194,355.37 194,355.37 92,631.07 40,166.20 40,161.36 40,110.99 40,082.89 39>425.79 Totals . . . . Dr. $901,434.95 $250,000,000.00 $70,000,000.00 Interest adjusted to June i, 1899. Pittsburg, June 3, 1899. CONSOLIDATION AT LAST 351 MEMORANDUM " B," covering details agreed upon at Atlantic City this iQth March, 1900, by each and every of the persons whose names are attached hereto; each agreeing with the others that he will do all in his power in good faith to carry out this agreement and to induce every other Stockholder in the Com- panies named to join in this agreement, being convinced that it will be for the best interests of all concerned : The business of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, the H. C. Frick Coke Company, and all the Companies subsidiary to each, cr either, to be consolidated, thus : All of the lands, works and other properties now owned and operated by The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, to be sold and transferred to the Carnegie Steel Company, an existing Pennsylvania Corporation, saving and excepting the Stocks held by it in certain other Corporations, to wit, the H. C. Frick Coke Company, with all its subsidiary Companies, the Oliver Iron Mining Company, the Union Railroad Co., the Pittsburg, Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R. Co., and all Stocks in other Com- panies, now held by The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, which are considered permanent investments and not merely securities ; payment therefor to be made in Stock of the Car- negie Steel Company, the Capital whereof shall be increased to ($50,000,000) Fifty Million Dollars. The Stock now held by The Carnegie Steel Company, Lim- ited, in the H. C. Frick Coke Company, the Youghiogheny Northern Railway Co., the Youghiogheny Water Co., the Mt. Pleasant Water Co., and the Trotter Water Co., to be distrib- uted among the Shareholders of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, in proportion to their several interests, said Share- holders to be charged for said Stocks at their respective book values as at April ist, 1900. ANDREW CARNEGIE. F. T. F. LOVEJOY. HENRY PHIPPS. CHARLES M. SCHWAB. LAWRENCE C. PHIPPS. THOMAS MORRISON. JAMES GAYLEY. DAVID M. CLEMSON. ANDREW M. MORELAND. A Corporation to be formed under the laws of New Jersey, having the name and title The Carnegie Company, with $160,- 000,000 Capital Stock, which Company shall acquire all the stock of the Carnegie Steel Company, the H. C. Frick Coke 352 THE ATLANTIC CITY COMPROMISE Co., all their subsidiary Companies, and the Stocks of all other Companies now held by The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, which are held as investments; by purchase, paying to the Stockholders therefor as follows : For all of the Stock in the Carnegie Steel Company, and for all of the Stocks now held by The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, saving and excepting the Stocks held by it in the H. C. Frick Coke Co., the Youghiogheny Northern Rly. Co., the Youghiogheny Water Co., the Mt. Pleasant Water Co., and the Trotter Water Co., One hundred and twenty-five million dollars in Stock of The Carnegie Company and a like amount in Bonds of said Company, as hereinafter described : For all of the Stock in the H. C. Frick Coke Co., the Youghiogheny Northern Rly. Co., the Youghiogheny Water Co., the Mt. Pleasant Water Co., the Trotter Water Co., and the Union Supply Co., Limited; Thirty-five million dollars in Stock of The Carnegie Company, and a like amount in Bonds of said Company, as hereinafter described. Preliminary to the foregoing, adjustments shall be made as follows : A Dividend shall be declared by The Carnegie Steel Com- pany, Limited, of such amount as shall be necessary to make the " Book Values " of the Stocks of The Carnegie Steel Com- pany, Limited, (exclusive of its holdings in the H. C. Frick Coke Co. and its subsidiary Companies) on the one hand, and of the H. C. Frick Coke Company and all its subsidiary Com- panies on the other, relatively the same on April ist, 1900, as they were on April ist, 1899, when the values of $250,000,000 and $70,000,000, respectively, were first established. After The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, shall have distributed among its shareholders its holdings of Stock in the H. C. Frick Coke Co. and its subsidiary Companies, adjust- ments shall be made between all the Stockholders in the H. C. Frick Coke Co., so that each shall hold his proper and propor- tionate amount of Stock in the subsidiary Companies; such adjustments to be made at the respective " Book-values," April ist, 1900, of the said Stocks. The Bonds to be issuea by The Carnegie Company shall be in such form as shall be agreed upon by the Committee herein- after named, under the directions of the General Counsel, and shall embody the following : Bonds payable in One hundred years; interest payable in New York, semi-annually, at five per cent per annum, free of all Tax; to be in such amounts, $1,000, $5,000 and $10,000, THE CARNEGIE COMPANY 353 as may be found best; to be divided into four series of $40,- 000,000 each so as to make interest fall due February 1st and August ist; March ist and September ist, May ist and No- vember ist, June ist and December ist of each year; secured by a Mortgage or Deed of Trust covering all the Stocks held by The Carnegie Company in all the subsidiary or operating Companies ; after Five years a Sinking Fund of one-half of one per cent, on said Bonds to be established ; Bonds to be subject to be drawn for redemption out of Sinking Fund at any time at 1.05 after five years. In case of default in the payment of interest, the principal may become due and payable. No per- sonal liability on Bonds; to be registered or not, at holder's option; with such other provisions as are usual or advised by counsel for the proper protection of the Bondholders. Each Stockholder in The Carnegie Company whose interest has not been fully paid up shall have the right and privilege at his option, of selling to The Carnegie Company, at par, suffi- cient of his Bonds to liquidate his indebtedness, or of deposit- ing as collateral security for such indebtedness, Bonds or Stock of The Carnegie Company in proportion to his indebtedness; three times in Stock or one and one-half times in Bonds, at his option. Stock in The Carnegie Company shall be reserved to the amount of $3,200,000 for the purpose of selling interests in said Company to deserving officials and employees, carrying out the plan heretofore established by Carnegie Brothers and Co., Ltd., which is declared to be an essential feature of the new Company. Signed in duplicate; one copy being intrusted to A. M. Moreland, Secretary of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the other copy to F. T. F. Love joy. ANDREW CARNEGIE. HENRY PHIPPS. C. M. SCHWAB. L. C. PHIPPS. THOS. MORRISON. JAMES GAYLEY. D. M. CLEMSON. A. M. MORELAND. F. T. F. LOVEJOY. Witness: JAS. BERTRAM. We, the undersigned, Shareholders in The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, having read the foregoing Agreement, do 23 354 THE ATLANTIC CITY COMPROMISE now hereby, by the signing hereof, fully approve the arrange- ment and join in the same as to our interest. GEORGE LAUDER, pr. ANDREW CARNEGIE. GIBSON D. PACKER. We, the undersigned, Stockholders in the H. C. Frick Coke Company, having read the foregoing Agreement, do now here- by, by the signing hereof, fully approve the arrangement and join in the same as to our interest. MRS. LUCY C. CARNEGIE, Ex. by ANDREW CARNEGIE. Five days after the signing of this agreement a charter was ' obtained of the State of New Jersey, incorporating the Carne- i gie Company for the purpose of acquiring all the stock of the Carnegie Steel Company, the H. C. Frick Coke Company, all their subsidiary companies, and the stocks of all companies hitherto held by the Carnegie Steel Company. It is worth noticing that the committee charged with the carrying out of the agreement ignored that part of it which, at the instance of Mr. Carnegie, excluded Mr. Frick ; and his name appeared third on the list of incorporators of the new company, as a subscriber for 15,484 shares. On March 3Oth the committee made its report concerning the adjustment of the relative book values of the two merging companies as follows : PITTSBURG, PA., March 30, 1900. To THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY, LIMITED. The Committee appointed by the Shareholders of The Car- negie Steel Company, Limited, and the H. C. Frick Coke Com- pany, for the purpose of carrying out the plans of Re- Organiza- tion of the Carnegie Interests, beg leave to report : In the matter of the adjustment of the relative Book Values of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the H. C. Frick Coke Company with its subsidiary Companies : AN 88 PER CENT. DIVIDEND 355 At April ist, 1899, the relative Book Values were as fol- lows : The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited .... 3.27986 H. C. Frick Coke Company and Allies. ... I. Based on careful estimates of March Profits of all the Companies whose Stock is included, the same relative Book Values, at April i, 1900, show a surplus for distribution to Shareholders of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, of. .$16,277,464.69 To this should be added the holdings of The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, in the Stock of the H. C. Frick Coke Company and its sub- sidiary Companies, carried on the Steel Com- pany's books at 5*585,174.39 Total for distribution $21,862,639.08 This Committee would, therefore, recommend the declaring by The Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, of a final Dividend of 88% or $22,000,000.00, payable as follows : To cover the Value of the Stock of the H. C. Frick Coke Company and its subsidiary Com- panies charged to Partners in accordance with the Re- Organization Agreement $5,5^5> I 74-39 3/>> payable in Cash on demand by either " Paid-up " Partners or " Debtor " Partners whose interests were purchased not later than January i, 1899 750,000.00 Balance payable at such times and in such in- stalments as this Committee shall decide after consultation with the principal Partners and the Treasurer 1 5,664,825.61 Total $22,000,000.00 Respectfully submitted, C. M. SCHWAB. . G. D. PACKER. F. T. F. LOVEJOY. A. M. MOREL AND. 356 THE ATLANTIC CITY COMPROMISE The following is a correct list of stockholders and bond- holders of the Carnegie Company, as formed or organized after the Frick- Carnegie suit : Capital $160,000,000.00 Bonds $160,000,000.00 Par Value of Stock, $1,000.00 per Share. Shares of Stock. Bonds. Andrew Carnegie 86,382 $88,147,000 Henry Phipps 17,227 17,577,000 Henry C. Frick 15,484 15,800,000 George Lauder 5,482 5,593,ooo Charles M. Schwab 3,980 4,061,000 Henry M. Curry 2,829 2,886,000 William H. Singer 2,830 2,886,000 Lawrence C. Phipps 2,654 2,707,000 Alexander R. Peacock 2,653 2,707,000 Lucy C. Carnegie 2,459 2,510,000 Francis T. F. Lovejoy 884 902,000 James Gayley 885 902,000 Thomas Morrison 885 902,000 Andrew M. Moreland 885 902,000 Daniel M. Clemson 885 902,000 George H. Wightman 884 902,000 John Walker 722 737,ooo Charles L. Taylor 663 677,000 Alfred R. Whitney 663 677,000 John C. Fleming 442 451,000 William W. Blackburn :.. 442 451,000 J. Ogden Hoffman 442 451,000 Millard Hunsiker 442 451,000 George E. McCague 442 451,000 James Scott 442 451,000 William E. Corey 442 451,000 Joseph E. Schwab 442 451,000 Thomas Lynch 317 323,000 Henry P. Bope 295 301,000 Lewis T. Brown 295 301,000 Robert T. Vandervort 255 260,000 John B. Jackson 176 179,000 John G. A. Leishman 176 179,000 Giles B. Bos worth 176 179,000 David G. Kerr 147 150,000 Homer J. Lindsay 147 150,000 Ezra F. Wood 147 150,000 Hampden E. Tener, Jr 147 150,000 George Megrew 147 150,000 Gibson D. Packer 147 150,000 William B. Dickson 147 150,000 THE CARNEGIE VETERANS 357 Shares of Stock. Albert C. Case 147 John McLeod 147 Charles W. Baker 147 Janet E. Ramsay 95 John Pontefract 95 Sylvanus L. Schoonmaker 95 Azor R. Hunt 74 Alva C. Dinkey 74 P. Toesten Berg 74 Charles McCreery 74 Caroline A. Wilson . 45 Helen R. Wilson 19 Clara B. Wilson 19 John T. Wilson 19 Edna C. Wilson 19 James G. Hunter 19 Emil Swenson 19 James J. Campbell 19 Frederic H. Kindl 19 James B. Dill I Andrew M. Moreland, Trustee 3, l %9 Bonds. $150,000 150,000 150,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 46,000 20,000 2O,OOO 20,000 2O,OOO 19,000 I9,OOO 19,000 Ig.OOO Total 160,000 $160,000,000 Thus was reached the final metamorphosis of the Carnegie Steel Company. In the new organization Mr. Frick was omitted from the directorate, as was also Mr. Carnegie. Mr. Lovejoy was also dropped. But outwardly peace prevailed; and the only remaining trace of a past conflict is the Society of Carnegie Veterans, formed of the loyal band of Carnegie adherents. No former partner is eligible for membership in this association who did not take part in the attempt to de- pose Mr. Frick. Once a year these young geniuses hold a ban- quet ; and, amid palms and electric mottoes to the glory of him who made them rich, recount their battles and congratulate each other on the outcome of their victory. And the dear departed shades of Kloman, Shinn, Coleman, T. M. Carnegie, Stewart^ Curry, and others long forgotten, would listen in vain for a word of recognition of their share in these triumphs. CHAPTER XXIII THE BILLION-DOLLAR FINALE THE absorption of the Carnegie Company by the United States Steel Corporation has been invested with much dignity and lofty cir- cumstance by numerous writers in reviews and magazines ; and owing to its magnitude, running into hundreds of millions, the transaction has struck the popular imagina- tion and acquired a world-wide interest. To those who watched the incident from the inside, who saw the framework of the scenery and the elaborate mechanism of the stage effects, who attended the rehearsals and heard the subdued tones of the prompter, there was a certain grim humor in a performance which those in front watched with bated breath. But despite its lack of spontaneity, the proceeding had the dignity con- ferred by magnitude; and its brilliant success made it impres- sive even to those who heard the creaking of the machinery. The time is not yet ripe for a full and frank description of the events leading up to this important consolidation ; but a rough outline of them may be given. About a year before Mr. Frick resigned the headship of the Carnegie Steel Company he appointed a committee, with Mr. Clemson as chairman, to report on a project he had formed of building a tube works at Conneaut, the Lake Erie terminus of the Bessemer Railroad. There being little freight from Pitts- burg to the Lake port, the ore trains returned for the most part empty ; and to utilize this profitless haul, various plans had been discussed by Mr. Frick and his colleagues for the build- ing of blast-furnaces and other works at Conneaut that would 358 PICKWICKIAN HUMOR 359 call for Pittsburg coal and coke. One of these schemes is out- lined in the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Managers held on January i6th, 1899, previously quoted; and at the same meeting Mr. Clemson made a remark which showed that, after making the investigation authorized by Mr. Frick, he was in favor of also starting the tube works. It is probable that these works would have been built by the Carnegie managers but for the attempt made the same year to sell out to the Moore Syndicate ; it being thought undesirable to antagonize, while such a deal was pending, the important finan- ciers who were interested in the National Tube Company, with which the new works would have come into competition. But there was no idea, at this time, of holding the tube project as a threat over anybody. It was a simple business plan growing out of the need for filling the empty ore-cars on their return to Conneaut. After the reorganization of the steel company consequent on the withdrawal of Mr. Frick, it was seen by Mr. Carnegie that this tube project might be revived and utilized to force the purchase of at least his own holdings in the Carnegie Company, and perhaps of the whole concern. So the plan was gone over afresh, amplified and made definite, and then given to the newspapers by the Carnegie press agent and by Carnegie interviews. Thus it was published the length and breadth of the country as the settled purpose of the steel company. Here are two of these statements : the first as furnished by the Car- negie press agent, and the second in a characteristic interview with Andrew Carnegie. The Pickwickian humor of the latter will not be lost on the reader who recalls the discussion of the Carnegie managers in 1899 concerning the Conneaut project, quoted in the eighteenth chapter of this book. " It has been determined by the Carnegie Company, in order to utilize this now profitless haul, to establish at the lake ter- minal, where it already owns great docks and has ample facilities for handling ore and for the lake shipment of the finished prod- 3 6o THE BILLION-DOLLAR FINALE uct, an extensive pipe and tube manufacturing plant, represent- ing an investment of $12,000,000. The projected works will stretch over a mile along the lake front, and will be the most extensive and complete plant of the kind in existence. Electric power will be mainly used for driving the machinery, and the system of operation will be continuous, the ore being unloaded from vessels at one end and worked through successive stages of iron and steel-making in a direct line to the finished pipe and tube at the other end." World's Work. " Immediately following the Carnegie Company announce- ment of the location of a tube plant at Conneaut Harlpor, Ohio, rumors were set afloat throwing some doubt on the sincerity of the company's intention to carry out the announced plans. In the iron trade there was an attempt to find a reason for the loca- tion of the plant at Conneaut rather than in the Pittsburg dis- trict. Regarding the reasons for going outside of the Pittsburg district Andrew Carnegie was quoted last week as follows: 'In fhe first place I am bound to say that Conneaut was not con- sidered until the Pennsylvania Railroad, without consulting, doubled our export rates . . . which led our people to take up the question : How can we escape from the grasp of this arbi- trary railroad combination? A study of the subject convinced every one that we could do so by taking to water. When I re- turned from Europe it was to find all agreed that this was the method of relief. . . . Our establishment at Conneaut will benefit Pittsburg, because we shall give the Pittsburg railroads an object lesson. A very small proportion of our freight will go by rail from these works. We are already in the shipping business, and have only to add half a dozen small steamers to our fleet to ply to the important lake cities, distributing steel and loading up with scrap, of which we shall use an enormous quantity. ' . . . Asked whether the proposed plant was supposed to be a blow at the National Tube Co., Mr. Carnegie replied that at one time the original National Company purchased billets from his company, but later decided to work its own blast furnaces and make its own billets. Continuing he said : ' As I under- stand the policy of the Carnegie Steel Co., it is to co-operate in every way with its fellow manufacturers in the industrial world, and not to push itself into any new field save in self-defence. We did not leave the National Tube Co. They left us, which they had a perfect right to do, of course. Now we are ready to shake hands and co-operate with them in the most friendly CONVERTING THE FINANCIERS 361 "In the conversion of the heathen.' spirit. We are better for them than a dozen small concerns, conducted in a small, jealous way. We believe there is room enough for the two concerns," etc. Iron Trade Review, Janu- ary I /th, 1901. In the conversion of the heathen, missionaries have found it useful to describe the condition of the damned before presenting a picture of the joys of the blessed. It was on some such principle that the threat of industrial war was thus made by the Carnegies before the blessings of co- operation and consolidation were set out before the vision of the alarmed financiers of the country. The panic produced by the double threat of the Carnegies to build a rival tube works and to enter into competition with the great Pennsylvania Rail- road has been graphically described by a recent magazine writer : " Either project as a threat would have been alarming. The two together as imminent and assured accomplishments pro- duced a panic. And a panic among millionaires, while hard to produce is, when once under way, just as much of a panic as is a panic among geese. They ran this way and that; they hid one behind another; they filled the newspapers with their squawkings ; they reproached, implored, accused each other. At last they ran to their master Morgan. And he negotiated with Carnegie." But the negotiations came later. They were preceded by a bankers' dinner, at which were preached the joys of industrial peace. This famous dinner also grew out of a previous inci- dent connected with Mr. Frick. Somewhere about the time of the purchase of the Moore 362 THE BILLION-DOLLAR FINALE option, Mr. Frick invited a number of prominent bankers to Pittsburg, to show them the armor-plate vault that had just been built for the Union Trust Company. Incidentally they were given an opportunity of seeing the extent of the iron and steel works at Pittsburg. Up to that time the resources of the Iron City were but imperfectly known in Wall Street. This visit showed that it was the busiest place in the world, and the centre of its greatest industry. Duly impressed, the bankers re- turned to New York ; and the courtesies they had received as Mr. Prick's guests were now treated as an outstanding asset of the Carnegie Steel Company. Through the influence of Mr. Albert C. Case, credit agent of the Carnegie Company, and that of Mr. Charles Stewart Smith, an intimate friend of Andrew Carnegie, arrangements were made with a prominent banker of New York, who had been among those entertained by Mr. Frick, to give a return dinner, ostensibly in honor of Mr. Schwab. This dinner was duly given ; and, as a spontaneous outburst of enthusiasm for Mr. Prick's earlier protege, it has been much written about and discussed. Mr. Morgan attended the dinner, and listened with great interest to Mr. Schwab's views on industrial combinations " views apparently so large, so wise, and so interesting that Mr. Morgan was strongly impressed by the speech and the speaker. Then there began a series of interviews which eventually led to the founding of the United States Steel Corporation, to the realization of Mr. Carnegie's desire to retire from the control of the business,"* and to the sale and absorption of the Carne- gie Company. It was the most masterly piece of diplomacy in the history of American industry, and formed a fitting climax to Andrew Carnegie's romantic business career. The further story of the merger has been told a hundred times and need not be repeated here. The part of the Carne- gies in it is indicated in the following letter to stockholders, now first published : * Prof. Henry Loomis Nelson. STORY OF THE MERGER 363 THE CARNEGIE COMPANY Offices; Carnegie Building, Pittsburg, Pa., qth March, iqoi. Personal and Confidential. DEAR SIR: To facilitate the exchange of the Stock of The Carnegie Company for Stock of the United States Steel Corporation, the undersigned, at the request of a majority of the Stockholders, have agreed to act as a Committee, on behalf of their Fellow Stockholders, to receive Certificates of Stock of The Carnegie Company, and to make the exchange for shares of Preferred and Common Stock of the new Company. You are therefore requested, if you desire to exchange your stock and to have this Committee act for you, to deliver the Certificates of Stock of The Carnegie Company held by you, to W. W. Blackburn, who will deliver to you the receipt of the Committee therefor. Such Certificates must be endorsed in blank (or may be accompanied by separate powers of attorney), with the names of the undersigned inserted as attorneys in fact, with power to them or any two of them to transfer the sait! Shares upon the books of the Company ; proper revenue stamps to be attached. The receipt appended hereto will then be signed. The basis of exchange is as follows : One share of the Carnegie Company stock (par value $1,000) to receive of the United States Steel Corporation Stock 15.3558 Shares of Seven Per Cent. Cumulative Pre- ferred, par value $100 $1,535.58; 14.1061 Shares Common, par value $100 $1,410.61. No scrip will be issued for frac- tional Shares, but exchange will be arranged at the rate of $100 per Share for Preferred and $50 per Share for Common, viz. : Where a depositor is entitled to less than one-half of one Share of Preferred or Common Stock, he will receive cash for same ; and where entitled to more than one-half of one Share of Preferred or Common Stock, he will be allotted and required to pay for the fractional Share at the above rate. A deposit of Stock with the Committee will constitute an acceptance of the above terms by the depositor. Yours respectfully, C. M. SCHWAB, ) L. C. PHIPPS, v Committee. W. W. BLACKBURN v , ) 364 THE BILLION-DOLLAR FINALE Had all the stockholders been subject to these terms it would have meant that the $160,000,000 of the Carnegie Com- pany's stock would have been exchanged for the United States Steel Company's stock as follows : Seven per cent, cumulative preferred $240,569,280 Common stock 225,697,760 $466,267,040 Add $160,000,000 bonds exchanged for the same amount of Carnegie bonds 160,000,000 Total $626,267,040 As a matter of fact, however, Andrew Carnegie, Mrs. Lucy C. Carnegie, and George Lauder were paid entirely in United States Steel Company bonds, at the rate of $1,500 per share. Thus for 96,000 shares of stock in the Carnegie Company they received $144,000,000 in bonds of the United States Steel Cor- poration. The balance of the $304,000,000 bond issue of the latter, or $160,000,000, was exchanged at par for the $160,000, - ooo bond issue of the Carnegie Company. For the balance of the stock of the Carnegie Company, i.e., 64,000 shares, was issued $98,277,120 in preferred stock and $90,279,040 in the common stock of the United States Steel Corporation. At the time of purchase the bonds and the preferred stock were considered worth par and the common stock 50 ; making the total amount paid at that time $447,416,640. Add to this the $22,000,000 dividend paid to Carnegie stockholders the previous year in adjustment of values in the consolidation of the coke and steel properties, and we reach the total cash value of the business to which Kloman's little forge had grown in forty years. THE END. APPENDIX THE E Q^U I T Y SUIT So me extracts from the pleadings of Henry C. Frick ON the 1 4th day of January, 1889, your orator was elected chairman of Carnegie Brothers & Co., Limited, and continued to act as such chairman until the new association of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, was formed. He was then elected chairman of the latter, and continued to act as such until December 5th, 1899. On January nth, 1895, with the assent of those interested and with a view to enable your orator to perform duties which were believed to be of more value to the firm than those then imposed upon said chairman, the office of president was created. Upon said officer was placed the details of the duties your orator had theretofore performed as chairman. Your orator continued as chairman with general supervisory power until December 5th, 1899. About that date Carnegie without reason, and actuated by malevolent motives, demanded his resignation of said position. Recognizing Carnegie's paramount influence as the holder of a majority interest, and desiring to prevent the evil which might result from discord, your orator acquiesced in the demand and gave his resignation. As chairman of said companies your orator had participated largely in and directed the business conducted by them and, until the time of his enforced resignation, said business was conducted to a large extent under his personal supervision, management, and direction. Carnegie lived in New York City. He spent much of his time abroad, remaining there con- tinually, at one time, for over eighteen months. Of course he was con- sulted about important matters, but he rarely participated in the current management of the business. For various reasons, none just, not necessary now to be stated, but which will appear hereafter in the taking of testimony, Carnegie has recently conceived a personal animosity towards your orator. This partly arose from the failure of you orator, in connection with others, to avail of an option given by Carnegie in consideration of the sum of one million, one hundred and seventy thousand dollars ($1,170,000), to Carnegie paid, and now retained by him, as a forfeit to purchase his (Carnegie's) interest in said Steel Company, Limited, for the sum of about one hundred and fifty-seven million, nine hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($157,950,000), which sum Carnegie insisted should be so preferred and secured that he would virtually have a first mortgage on all the partnership assets and thus gain a preference over all his partners. As has been heretofore said, on the 4th day of December, 1899, with- out good reason, and from malevolent motives towards me, Carnegie de- manded the resignation by your orator of his office of chairman of said company. This resignation, in the interest of harmony, was tendered. Since that time Carnegie has secured control of the whole association and of its affairs, and has compelled the co-partners, other than Henry Phipps, Jr., F. T. F. Lovejoy, and Henry M. Curry, and perhaps others, who refused to carry out his orders and desires, to pass such resolutions and do such acts as he dictated, without regard to their conformity to their real wishes, 365 3 66 APPENDIX or to their judgment, as to the true policy of the association. Many of the partners were unable or unwilling to incur his animosity, lest he might at- tempt to forfeit their interests in the association. Some of them were prac- tically unable to resist his will because of their large indebtedness thereto. In order that he might injure your orator, whilst benefiting himself, Carnegie conceived a scheme to forfeit the interest of your orator in the association, worth upwards of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000), in such way as would not oblige him to pay therefor one-half of its real value and would enable him to make payment therefor in small instalments at very long intervals of time. As part of this fraudulent scheme, Carnegie, who had rarely attended the meetings of the Board of Managers of the Steel Company, Limited, theretofore held, presented himself at a meeting of the said board, held on the 8th day of January, 1900, after the resignation by your orator of his chairmanship, and when he was not present. Carnegie then presented to said Board of Managers resolutions by him previously prepared, which he caused to be adopted. Many of the statements in said resolutions were false. The whole of the resolutions were misleading. In them he referred to a certain so-called iron-clad agreement. Carnegie followed up his action in this respect by obliging the Board of Managers to instruct the secretary to receive signatures to this so-called iron-clad agreement, which, for the first time, he called a supplemental iron-clad agreement, of July ist, 1892. No such agreement had ever been executed by Carnegie. Many other members of the firm had never executed the same. This so-called agree- ment was inoperative and void. Carnegie knew that it was void and in- operative. He knew that neither he nor the Carnegie Steel Company had any power to compel any person to sell his interest in the firm in pursuance thereof ; yet, knowing this, without your orator's knowledge, secretly, after said resolutions had been passed, he signed for the first time said so-called iron-clad agreement of July ist, 1892. At the same time, or shortly after, he caused, directly or indirectly, other persons to sign the same, with a fraudulent intent thereby, and without your orator's knowledge or consent, to make a contract for him under which he, Carnegie, could seize your orator's interest in said firm. All these acts he carefully concealed from your orator, his partner. Subsequently, in person, Carnegie threatened your orator when he called upon him, that unless he would do what he, Carnegie, desired, he would deprive your orator of his interest in the firm. In pursuance of his fraudulent intent and in furtherance of his said scheme of fraud, Carnegie caused to be served on your orator on the I5th day of January, 1900, a notice purporting to be given under and in pursuance of said so-called iron-clad agreement. In this demand was made, in the name of Carnegie and in that of other persons who had been forced by him to sign the same, that your orator should transfer his interest in said Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. Having failed to secure this transfer, Carnegie persuaded Schwab, one of the defendants, who was acting as president of said association, to transfer, on the first day of February, 1900, on the books of the company, your orator's interest in said Steel Company, Lim- ited, as if he were entitled to make said transfer as attorney in fact of your orator. After Schwab had made this pretended transfer, Carnegie pre- tended, now pretends, and many of the partners under his compulsion pretend, that the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, owns all your orator's interest in said firm. Carnegie, being the owner of 58 J per centum of the entire capital thereof, is now pretending to be the owner of over 60 per cen- tum of your orator's said interest, thus pretended to have been acquired. Carnegie further pretends that he need not and will not pay for your THE EQUITY SUIT 367 orator's interest what it is fairly worth, but that he can only be compelled to pay a price which will be determined by himself, and by the partners he controls. This price, he contends, can only be demanded by your orator in such small instalment during a term of years of such duration as will, probably, not only enable the company to entirely pay for your orator's interests by using the share of the profits applicable to them, but have a surplus left to the company. Thus, it is part of Carnegie's scheme not only to seize your orator's interest, but to make it pay for itself out of the profits, and thereafter leave Carnegie, in large part, the owner of said interests, with a large surplus of money besides. Though Carnegie pre- tends that he had thus secured a large part of your orator's interest in a way which will inure to his benefit, he denies all individual liability what- ever for its payment, and claims that the only party who will be obliged to pay the price he will determine to give will be the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, which he will use for that purpose. The exact manner in which Carnegie will seek to depreciate the value to be paid for your orator's interest cannot be stated by your orator in de- tail with certainty; but he believes and therefore avers that although Carnegie's attention and that of the defendants have been called by him to the fact that the values of the company assets on its books were wholly in- adequate, and although he and the defendants have been requested to make said values conform with the truth, he, the said Carnegie, will use figures put upon the books years ago, which are obsolete, and are not by any of the defendants pretended to be correct ; will fail to put any valuation upon assets of immense value ; and will resort to other illegal and unfair devices. Your orator shows to your Honors that this attempt of Carnegie to expel him from the firm and seize his interest therein at but a mere fraction of its real value, is not made by him in good faith and for the best interests of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. It is not actuated by honorable motives on his part, nor for the future good of the firm, but is a determina- tion to punish your orator, principally, because of the failure of the scheme by which Carnegie was to realize over $157,000,000 for his interest, and, also, in part, to make gain for himself by seizing your orator's interest at very far below its real and fair value. In order that the business of the firm of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, might not be jeopardized by inharmonious relations between the partners and that its enormous business might be carried on by united and harmonious action, your orator was willing, upon ascertaining the animosity of Carnegie towards himself, and his determination to drive him from the firm, to dispose of his interest therein at a fair value. This fact was stated by your orator to Carnegie when the latter called, in January, 1900, at his office, in an endeavor to coerce the making of a sale by your orator at a price below what was fair. An offer was then made by your orator to Carnegie that in case a fair price could not be agreed upon for his interest, which the latter insisted upon securing, that your orator would agree to refer to the arbitration of three disinterested men, the determination and fixing of a fair value. This offer Carnegie refused, doubtless because he hoped to acquire such interest at much less than the fair value thereof by means of his fraudulent scheme hereinbefore set out, which scheme he was then, though without any intimation of that fact to your orator, secretly perfecting and determined to carry into effect. Your orator still is willing, in order that harmony may be preserved and that the great interests involved may not be subjected to jeopardy, to sell his interest in the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, at a fair value, to 368 APPENDIX be ascertained by three disinterested business men. He now tenders his willingness so to do. Notwithstanding the fraudulent actions of Carnegie, your orator also is willing, in order that the enormous business interests of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, may be protected, without injury to any of its partners, to continue the business of the said firm in accordance with the true spirit of the articles of agreement of July ist, 1892, creating the same. If, as your orator is advised and believes, the said articles created a general, and not a limited, partnership, he is willing, and now tenders such willingness, to have such action taken by the firm and by the partners thereof as will make the said firm strictly a limited partnership, as origi- nally intended. Your orator is further willing, and now tenders such willingness, to continue the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, as a general partnership, if he is allowed, as one of the partners, to participate in the management thereof, claiming no other or further right than that of a general partner in a general partnership. Your orator is not willing, however, to continue the general partnership under the sole control of Carnegie, without being allowed to have any par- ticipation therein, Carnegie is so engaged in other occupations and diver- sions that, were he otherwise able so to do, he cannot properly manage and carry on said business. Your orator believes and avers that the financial prosperity of the firm will be impaired by the exclusive manage- ment and control of the same by Carnegie. All of the defendants excepting Henry Phipps, F. T. F. Lovejoy and Henry M. Curry, and possibly others, at the instance of Carnegie, now claim that your orator has no interest in the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and that his only right is to demand from said company, at long postponed periods, such amount in compensation as Carnegie shall be willing to concede him. Your orator thus by the fraudulent acts of Carnegie and the acqui- escence therein of the defendants, other than those above named has been ejected from the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and has been and is now denied any participation in its business. Your orator's interest therein has been taken possession of by the defendants, and they at the instance and under the domination of Carnegie, are now carrying on the said business, alleging that they will continue to carry it on as if your orator had no in- terest therein. Your orator alleges that the whole effort v-hich has been made, and which the defendants are now seeking to make effectual, is in pursuance of said fraudulent scheme of Carnegie to practically seize your orator's interest in said firm. This attempt is being made, although Carnegie knows, and all the defendants know, that the prosperity of the firm, in considerable partj is the result of your orator's continuous and close personal manage- ment of the same, from the time of its organization. Your orator denies that there is or was when said notice was given any contract under which the defendants have acquired, or lawfully can acquire, his interest in said firm. He avers that the attempt to acquire the same and said pretended transfer thereof by said Schwab, are illegal and void. Schwab was not the attorney in fact of your orator to make said transfer nor did he have any lawful authority so to do. Wherefore your orator needs equitable relief, and prays as follows : First. A decree that the pretended transfer of your orator's interests in the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, was and is null and void. . . . Second. An injunction, now special, hereafter to be made final, re- THE EQUITY SUIT 369 straining the defendants from any interference with your orator's interest in said Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and from excluding him from a participation in the care and management of the assets and business. Third. An injunction, special until hearing, and perpetual thereafter, enjoining and restraining the defendants from conducting the business operations of the firm called the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, without permitting your orator to participate therein. Fourth. An injunction, special until hearing, and perpetual thereafter, enjoining and restraining the defendants from tranf erring to the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, or to any person or persons, or corporation, your orator's interest in the said Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. Fifth. A decree ordering the defendants to cancel upon the books of the said firm, any assignment or transfer heretofore made, or pretended to be made, to said association, of your orator's interest in said firm, and all fur- ther assignments, if any, to any other persons, of your orator's said interests. Sixth. A decree ordering the defendants to join with your orator in conducting and managing the affairs and business and properties of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited. Seventh. A decree ordering the defendants to cancel and erase all entries upon the books of the firm of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, of insufficient, unfair, and improper valuations of its assets and of your orator's interest therein, and to cause the said books so to be kept as to fairly and fully show the real value of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, as a going concern and your orator's interest therein. Eighth. In case the defendants shall refuse the offers hereinbefore by your orator made, . . . that your Honorable Court will thereupon allow your orator to declare the said firm of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, dissolved, and that you will thereupon appoint a receiver to take charge of all the business and assets of the said firm, permitting said receiver to fulfil unperformed contracts and to do whatever shall be necessary in and about the proper liquidation of its affairs, and that, after the conversion of the entire assets of the company into money and the payment of the debts of the said company, your Honorable Court will then distribute the balance thereof among the partners in proportion to their interests. Ninth. That an account be taken between Carnegie and your orator, whereby Carnegie shall be charged with all the losses, expenses, and dam- age he has caused your orator by his illegal and fraudulent conduct hereinbefore stated; and hat if Carnegie persists in his said fraudulent scheme and refuses the offers hereinbefore made, and thus causes the actual dissolution of the firm, all losses incurred by your orator by reason of the said dissolution and forced winding up of the firm shall be charged against him, and that he shall be decreed to make good and pay to your orator the difference between what his interest was fairly worth on or about February ist, 1900, and the amount he shall receive through the decree of this court in final liquidation and settlement of the said firm. Tenth. That all entries Carnegie or any other person has caused to be made on the books of the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, in pursu- ance of said fraudulent scheme of said Carnegie, shall be erased and cancelled under the decree of this Honorable Court. Eleventh. General relief. JOHN G. JOHNSON, D. T. WATSON, WILLIS F. McCooK, Solicitors for Plainti^ RETURN TO the circulation desk of any University of California Library or to the NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY Bldg. 400, Richmond Field Station University of California Richmond, CA 94804-4698 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS 2-month loans may be renewed by calling (415)642-6753 1-year loans may be recharged by bringing books to NRLF Renewals and recharges may be made 4 days prior to due date DUE AS STAMPED BELOW 1990 MOV 18 1992 " :