^aOJITVDJO^' 
 
 
 
 
 ^OFCAIIFO% 
 
 "^^AHvaaiHV^ 
 
 ,^WEUNIVER% 
 
 
 ^lOSANCfLfx> 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^/Sa3AINn3WV^ 
 
 
 ^ILIBRARYQr 
 
 '^<!/0JnV3JO-^ ^<!/0JnV3-JO>^ 
 
 ^\^EUNIVER% 
 
 
 f 
 
 
 ^Aa3AINfl]y\V 
 
 ^0FCAIIF0%. 
 
 ^,OFCALIF0% .^WEUNIVERi//i 
 
 ^0\}iMm\H'^ 
 
 ^^o\}\ym\n'^ 
 
 
 ^;^ILIBRARY<://^ ^^WEUNIYERV^ ^V^OS ANCElfj^ 
 
 ^TOITVDJO'?' ^laDNVSOl^"^ 
 
 %a3AlNn-3WV^ 
 
 -s^^tllBRARYOr ^U\ 
 
 ^OdllVDJO'^ ^<f/Od 
 
 ^OFCAIIFO/?^ 
 
 CC I.I IB li \ ^ 
 
 ^mMmSs^ ^OFCALIFO/?/!^ ^OF 
 
 ^mmin"^ %mmov^ '^^/smmi^ "^^okmrni"^ 
 
 ^m-mius;^ 
 
 '^/ia3AiNamv 
 
 vAlUBRARY^?^^ 
 
 >v;^UIBRARYQc 
 
 ^<!/ojnv3JO'f^ %ojnv3jo^ 
 
 ^WEUNIVERS/A 
 
 "^IJONVSO^^"^' 
 
 v>;lOSANCElfj> 
 
 so 
 ?o 
 
 ^OFCAIIFO/?^ ^OFCALIFO/?^ 
 
 
 .^^\E•UNIVERS/A 
 
 >^r. 
 
 I 
 
<ril]0NVS01^'^ ^iiHAiNamv 
 
 ^^ 
 
 
 .^MEUNIVER5•//, 
 
 vj<lOSANCElfj> 
 
 <rii30Nvsoi^^ "^AyaAiNfi 3WV' 
 
 .^^.OPCAIIFO^ ^OFCALIFO% 
 
 -v^lliBRARYOc;^ 
 
 ^^^l•LIBRARYa/: 
 
 '^^OJIIVDJO'^ 
 
 .^WfUNIVER% 
 
 ^lOSANCElfj> 
 
 ^cffOJ nVD- J0>^ <rii30NVS01^ '%il3AINn-3WV^ 
 
 ^OFCAilFO/?,,^ 
 
 ^OFCAilF0%> 
 
 ^^ 
 
 
 ^<5Aavaaii#^ 
 
 OS 
 
 < J>, ^ 
 
 '^mwim^ 
 
 vvlOSANCElfj: 
 
 O u- 
 
 %a3AlNn3V\V^ 
 
 ^V\EUNIVER% 
 
 DigUi2©*(byjjJie lntei^ieftAAft?^ive^HiBRARY(9/ 
 
 <ril3DNYS01^ 
 
 '^^Aa3AiNfimv' 
 
 ^<i/OJnVDJO'^ ^itfOJlWDJO'^ 
 
 ,\V\EUNIVER5//, 
 
 
 vj<lOSANCElfj> 
 
 ■^AdaAiNnawv 
 
 
 ^0FCAIIF0% 
 
 ^(2AHvaani^ ^<:?Aiivaani^ 
 
 ^VllBRARYQ^ 
 
 ^,^^UIBRARY<9/: 
 
 %0JI1VJJ0>^ 
 
 ^^WEUNIVER% 
 
 ^lOSANGElfj^^ 
 o 
 
 %jnv3jo>^ <rii]DNVsoi^'^ %a3AiNn3Wv' 
 
 .^OFCALIFO% 
 
 ;A;OFCAl|F0/?^ 
 
 S)hi^.¥rt/d^tails/ 
 
 :^ ^--^? %' 
 
 ^aAHVaailA^ ^^AHVHJinA^ 
 
 aweuniver% 
 
 
 ^lOSANCElfj> 
 o 
 
 33 
 
 -JO 
 
 laatfDbBaYic 
 
 
8 9 T T 
 
 
•G88I 
 
 'AXYdHOO axY xoxaudv 'a 
 
 • , •,! • • • • « , • , • 
 
 
 •vorjaMV JO saxvxs aaxmn 
 
 HHX ^O 
 
 MOTiaillStiOQ SHI JO MOIIYMOI 
 
 anx JO 
 
 i^OXSIH 
 
 [ 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 Vll 
 
 of New Y 
 
 In New York. In Massachusetts 
 
 In Virginia 
 
 In Maryland. In congress. Eiot in Philadelphia 
 
 Congress adjourns to Princeton .... 
 
 Eivalry for the site of the federal government 
 
 Coalition in favor of its present site 
 
 Hamilton on the defects of the confederation 
 
 Ellsworth on national existence .... 
 
 Forebodings of Hamilton. He retires from congress 
 
 Connecticut delays its adhesion to a federal convention 
 
 Forced emigration of royalists .... 
 
 Washington examines the inland water communications 
 
 Haldimand refuses to surrender the interior posts 
 
 Congress votes Washington a statue. It receives him publicly 
 
 Follows his counsels on the army and navy . 
 
 On interior trade. On the state of Ohio 
 
 On doing honor to Kosciuszko 
 
 An envoy from the Dutch republic 
 
 Madison forced to retire by the rule of rotation 
 
 Washington calls on his old soldiers to promote union . 
 
 The city of New York restored .... 
 
 The officers of the array bid farewell to Washington 
 
 His journey through New Jersey. Through Philadelph 
 
 He resigns his commission 
 
 -He returns to Mount Vernon .... 
 
 ork 
 
 CHAPTER IT. 
 
 VIEGINIA STATESMEX LEAD TOWARD A BETTER UNIOIT. 
 
 17S4. 
 
 Four motives to union 
 
 Congress declines to lead the way. England compels union . 
 
 The views of Virginia 
 
 Jefferson describes the United States as one nation 
 
 Congress vote them to be one nation 
 
 Jefferson's plan for international commerce. Accepted by congress 
 Jefferson and Washington on commerce with the West 
 
 Honors decreed to Washington by Virginia 
 
 Washington pleads with Virginia statesmen for a national constitution 
 The great West to form an empire of republics 
 
 Jefferson's ordinance 
 
 Against slavery in the West. How it was lost 
 
 Jefferson's life-long opinion on slavery . 
 
 His ordinance for disposing of the public lands 
 
 The mint and American coinage. The cost of the war 
 
 Holland and John Adams. Generosity of France. Jefferson's financial plan 120 
 
 Patrick Henry disposed to increase the power of congress . . , . 121 
 
 VOL. VI. — B 
 
viii CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 121 
 
 122 
 
 123 
 124 
 124 
 
 National measures of Virginia 
 
 Jefferson enforces union 
 
 Tlie committee of states. Retirement of Robert Morris 
 
 Lee and Madison on a federal convention 
 
 France sees the tendency of the confederation to dissolution 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE WEST. 
 
 1784-1785. 
 
 Washington's tour to the West 125 
 
 His scheme of internal navigation. Ilis report to Governor Harrison . . 126 
 
 Lafayette in the United States 127 
 
 Washington negotiates between Virginia and Maryland. lie i^cfuses gifts . 128 
 
 Virginia appoints commissioners to treat with Maryland .... 129 
 The fifth congress and Richard Henry Lee as its president . . . .129 
 
 Samuel Adams for a firm government 130 
 
 The politics of New York corrupted by its custom-house .... 130 
 
 Washington's western pohey ISO 
 
 He brings it before congress. William Grayson . . ... . . 131 
 
 Pickering against slavery in the West 132 
 
 King revives Jefferson's antislavery clause 132 
 
 The proposal committed. King's report " . 133 
 
 Grayson favors the prohibition of slavery 134 
 
 His ordinance for the disposal of western lands 1 34 
 
 Can congress levy armed men ? 135 
 
 CHAPTEPv lY. 
 
 THE REGULATION OF COMMERCE. THE FIFTH CONGRESS. 
 
 1784-1785. 
 
 Proposed reform of the confederacy by less than a unanimous vote . . 136 
 
 Tract by Noah Webster 136 
 
 Excessive importations of British goods. The consequent distress . .137 
 
 Remedies proposed in New York 138 
 
 Pennsylvania proposes a protective system . . . . . . .138 
 
 Movements in Boston noted by Grayson 139 
 
 Boston demands more powers for congress and a protective tariff . . . 139 
 
 Bowdoin recommends a federal convention 140 
 
 Instructions to the Massachusetts delegates 140 
 
 Movements in New Hampshire and Rhode Island. In Pennsylvania . .141 
 John Adams applauds a navigation act. James Monroe . . . .141 
 
 His compromise proposal for a revenue. His report 142 
 
 His procrastination 143 
 
 Is puzzled by Adam Smith on the Wealth of Nations 144 
 
 The extreme South afraid of a navigation act 144 
 
CONTENTS. ix 
 
 PAGE 
 
 The objections of Richard Henry Lee 144 
 
 Monroe wishes his measure delayed. Congress regrets Madison . . . 145 
 
 The Massachusetts delegates disobey their instructions 146 
 
 Their reasons. Bowdoin's reply 146 
 
 The effect 147 
 
 The American commissioners for treaties meet with a rebuff from England . 14*7 
 
 John Adams and King George 148 
 
 England will not treat except on the condition of a preference . . . 148 
 
 Adams proposes retaliation. Interview of Adams with Pitt .... 149 
 
 The United States agree with France for a perfect reciprocity . . . 152 
 France reduces the duty on American fish-oil. Treaty with Prussia . .152 
 
 Spain reserved. Noble spirit of South Carolina. Treaty with Morocco . 153 
 
 A new constitution cannot spring from congress 153 
 
 CHAPTER Y. 
 
 OBSTACLES TO UNION EEMOYED OR QUIETED. 
 
 1783-1787. 
 
 State of religion in the colonies 1 54 
 
 Virginia disestablishes the church 155 
 
 Hawley and the inquisition into faith by the temporal power . . . 155 
 
 Decline of the Anglican church in Virginia 156 
 
 Does religion need compulsory support ? Opinions of the Presbyterians . 156 
 
 Of the Baptists. Patrick Henry proposes a legal support for Christianity . 156 
 
 Madison opposes. Opinion of Washington 157 
 
 Of the Baptists. Of the convention of the Presbyterian church . . .158 
 Jefferson's bill for religious freedom adopted. Other states follow . .158 
 
 The statute in French and Italian 159 
 
 The Protestant Episcopal church of the United Slates 159 
 
 The Methodists. Their missionaries in America 160 
 
 Their superintendents. Their liturgy 161 
 
 Their first general conference 162 
 
 The superintendent defined to be a bishop. The Methodists and slavery . 163 
 
 Rapid increase of the Methodists. Roman Catholics in the United States . 164 
 
 Adjustment of claims to land by Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York . 165 
 By South Carolina, Virginia. Enlargement of Pennsylvania . . .165 
 
 New York yields to temptation. Slaverj and freedom never reconciled . 166 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 STATE LAWS IMPAIEING THE OBLIGATION OF CONTRACTS PROVE THE NEED 
 OF AN OVERRULING UNION. 
 
 Before May 1787. 
 
 Paper money in the American states 167 
 
 Laws of Connecticut. Of ilassachusetts ....... 168 
 
 Of New Hampshire. Rhode Island 169 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 The court and the legislature of Rhode Island in conflict . . . .169 
 
 The laws of New York. Of New Jersey .170 
 
 Of Pennsylvania lYl 
 
 Of Delaware. Of Maryland. Of Georgia. Of South Carolina . . .1*72 
 
 Of North Carolina. Of Virginia . . .173 
 
 Inflexibility of Washington ^ 174 
 
 Public opinion on paper money 175 
 
 Opinions of Madison and Roger Sherman ....... 176 
 
 CHAPTER YII. 
 
 00NGEES3 CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 
 
 1783-1786. 
 Washington in private life. The visit of Iloudon 
 Invitations to France by its king and queen .... 
 Situation and value of Mount Vernon. The house and grounds 
 The lands, negroes, and produce 
 
 Washington embarrassed for income. A gradual abolitionist 
 
 Uis love of hunting. lie arranges his papers 
 
 His perfect amiability. His exemplary life .... 
 
 His religion. His hatred of war 
 
 His sympathy for the Irish and the Greeks .... 
 
 Ilis enthusiasm at the beginning of the French revolution 
 
 He enjoins moderation on Lafayette. In politics an impartial American 
 
 The commissioners of Maryland and Virginia meet at Mount Vernon 
 
 The results. States divided on granting power over trade to congress 
 
 Opinion of Madison 
 
 Of Washington. Hesitation of Virginia 
 
 Maryland suggests a politico-commercial commission 
 
 The wisdom of Madison. Calling a convention at Annapclis 
 
 The sixth congress 
 
 More strength to the confederacy, or an end to the union 
 
 Plan for a federal convention 
 
 Strife between New Jersey and New York. Congress interposes 
 New Jersey leads the way to a general convention 
 
 What was written by Monroe 
 
 By Grayson. The views of South Carolina . 
 Monroe opposes a general convention .... 
 Grayson's proposal. Proposal of Charles Pinckney 
 His committee ofPer seven new articles of confederation 
 Congress rests its hopes on the system of April 1783 . 
 
 Discussions in New York city 
 
 New York retains the collecting of the revenue 
 Pennsylvania recedes from the revenue plan of congress 
 Does not heed a delegation from congress 
 Congress expostulates with the governor of New York . 
 Clinton will not yield. Congress fails .... 
 Why it could not but fail 
 
 . 177 
 . 177 
 . 178 
 . 178 
 . 179 
 . 180 
 . 180 
 . 181 
 . 182 
 . 182 
 . 182 
 . 182 
 . 183 
 . 183 
 . 184 
 . 184 
 . 185 
 . 185 
 . 186 
 . 187 
 . 187 
 . 188- 
 . 188 
 . 189 
 . 189 
 . 190 
 . 191 
 . 192 
 . 192 
 . 193 
 . 193 
 . 193 
 . 193 
 . 193 
 . 194-^ 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER yill. 
 
 VIRGINIA INVITES DEPUTIES OF THE SEVERAL LEGISLATUEE8 OF THE STATES 
 TO MEET IN CONVENTION. 
 
 September 1786 to May 1787. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 The convention at Annapolis .195 
 
 Only five states appear. Their extreme caution in their report . . .196 
 
 They fix the time and place of a federal convention 196 
 
 King prevents the recommendation of the measure by congress . . .196 
 
 Clinton condemns the commissioners from New York 196 
 
 King before the legislature of Massachusetts 196 
 
 Followed by Nathan Dane 197 
 
 Massachusetts declines the suggestions from Annapolis . . . .197 
 
 Madison and Virginia. The assembly unanimous. Its declaratory preamble . 197 
 Virginia selects its delegates. Decision of New Jersey . . . .198 
 
 Of Pennsylvania. North Carolina and Delaware 199 
 
 The conciliatory movement of King in congress. It succeeds . . .199 
 The decision of New York. The insurrection in Massachusetts . . . 200 
 
 Its legislature accepts the invitation from Annapolis 201 
 
 So do South Carolina and Georgia. Connecticut. New Hampshire . . 201 
 
 Expectation of the British ministry 202 
 
 Madison prepares a complete plan of a constitution. Jefferson's advice . 202 
 
 Conciliates Randolph, governor of Virginia 202 
 
 Principles that governed Madison 202 
 
 The preparation of Washington for the convention 203 
 
 III.— TEE FEDERAL CONVENTION, 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 
 
 14 May to 13 June 1787. 
 
 Events overruled by justice. General desire for a closer union 
 Character of the elections to the federal convention 
 
 Journey to Philadelphia 
 
 Arrival of Washington. Opening of the federal convention 
 
 The Virginia members prepare a finished plan 
 
 Washington declares for a new constitution . 
 
 Position of Edmund Randolph 
 
 His station and character .... 
 
 Virginia unites under the lead of Madison . 
 
 Shall the convention vote by states ? Arrival of delegates 
 
 Their jarring opinions. Wa-shington's appeal to them 
 
 The convention organized 
 
 . 207 
 . 207 
 . 207 
 . 208 
 . 208 
 .208 
 . 208 
 . 209 
 . 2C9 
 . 210 
 . 210 
 . 211 
 
Xll 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Limited power of the delegates from Delaware 211 
 
 Position of Rhode Island. Character of the delegates . . . .211 
 
 Votes of individuals not to be recorded. Randolph opens the convention . 212 
 
 He proposes an outline of a constitution 212 
 
 Proposal of Virginia to found representation on free inhabitants . . 2l4 
 
 Charles Pinckney presents a plan. Debates in committee .... 215 
 
 Butler supports the Virginia plan. Government must act on individuals . 215 
 
 Sherman not yet ready 215 
 
 Debate on equality of suffrage. Delaware interposes 216 
 
 The legislature to be of two branches 216 
 
 One branch to be directly chosen by the people 216 
 
 Extent of the federal legislative powers 217 
 
 The right to negative any state law denied. Coercion of states . . .218 
 The national executive. The mode of its election and its powers . .219 
 
 Shall it be of one or more ? Sherman for its subordination to the legislature 219 
 
 Shall there be unity in the executive ? Shall it be chosen by the people ? . 220 
 
 Its period of service 220 
 
 How to be chosen. How to be removed 221 
 
 Speech of Dickinson for a vote by states in one branch of the legislature . 221 
 
 Randolph proposes an executive of three members . . . . . 222 
 
 Opinions on an executive council. The executive to be single . . . 222 
 
 The veto power 222 
 
 The judiciary 223 
 
 Appointment of judges 224 
 
 Shall the house of representatives be chosen by the states ? . . . . 224 
 
 Or by the people ? 224 
 
 How both branches are to be chosen. Hamilton's opinion .... 225 
 
 How to choose the senate . . 226 
 
 Are the states in danger ? The equality of the small states defended . . 227 
 
 Franklin interposes as a peacemaker 227 
 
 Connecticut the umpire between the small states and the large ones . . 228 
 
 The large states prevail 228 
 
 The requirement of an oath 229 
 
 Term of office and qualifications of representatives . . . . i 229 
 
 Of senators. The work of the committee ended 230 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 NEW JERSEY CLAIMS AX EQUAL EEPEESENTATION OF THE STATES. 
 
 From the Fifteenth to the Nineteenth of June 1787. 
 
 -:^ The small states dissatisfied. The plan of Connecticut . . . .231 
 
 New Jersey resists the large states 232 
 
 The plan of New Jersey 233 
 
 Debate on the extent of the powers of the convention .... 233 
 
 Paterson pleads for the equality of the states in one supreme council . . 234 
 
 Debate on the sovereignty of a single body 234 
 
 Speech and plan of Hamilton 235 
 
CONTENTS. xiii 
 
 PAGB 
 
 How his plan was received 2b7 
 
 The Virginia plan reported to the house 238 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE CONI^ECTICUT COMPROMISE. 
 
 Erom the Nineteenth of June to the Second of July 1787. 
 
 The states and the nation. Independence declared unitedly . . . 239 
 
 Connecticut takes the lead 239 
 
 Character of Roger Sherman 240 
 
 Of Johnson. Of Ellsworth 241 
 
 Federal and national. Speech of Mason for two branches .... 242 
 
 Sherman for two branches 243 
 
 The convention decides for two branches 244 
 
 Wilson speaks for the general government and the state governments . . 244 
 Ellsworth would graft a general government on the state governments . 245 
 
 The mode of choosing and term of oflace of the senators .... 245 
 The decision. Fierce contest between the smaller states and the large ones 246 
 
 Franklin proposes prayer 247 
 
 The debate continues 248 
 
 Suffrage in the first branch proportioned to population .... 249 
 
 Ellsworth would have the vote in the senate by states 249 
 
 Speech of Baldwin. Wilson refuses to yield 250 
 
 So does Madison, Persistence of Ellsworth 251 
 
 He is supported by North Carolina . 252 
 
 The convention equally divided 253 
 
 Appointment of a grand committee to report a compromise .... 253^ 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 THE ADJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION". 
 
 From the Third to the Twenty-third of July 1787. 
 
 Franklin's compromise 255 
 
 Morris claims representation for property 256 
 
 The ratio of representation referred to a committee 256 
 
 Report of the committee 257 
 
 Appointment of a committee of one from each state 257 
 
 Madison's proposal of compromise. Report of the new committee . . 258 
 
 Approved by all except South Carolina and Georgia 259 
 
 Yates and Lansing desert their post 259 
 
 The southern states have a majority in the convention 260 
 
 Abolition of slavery in the North 260 
 
 Movement against the slave-trade. Two classes of slave states . . . 261 
 Jealousy of the speedy preponderance of western states .... 262 
 
 The equal rights of the western states maintained 263 
 
 Strife on the representation for slaves 264 
 
 A triple set of parties prevent a decision. Rash proposal of Morris . . 265 
 
xiv CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGB 
 
 Taxation and representation 265 
 
 Slaves to be counted as three fifths in representation 266 
 
 Morris fears injury to commerce from the influence of western states . , 267 
 
 Eepresentation in the second branch proportioned to numbers . . . 267 
 
 Effect of the decision on the political power of ihe South .... 268 
 
 The senate to vote by states 269 
 
 CHAPTER Y. 
 
 THE OUTLINE OF THE CONSTITUTION COMPLETED AND REFEERED, 
 
 From the Seventeenth to the Twenty-seventh of Julj 1787. 
 
 The distribution of powers between the general government and the states . 270 
 
 Eelation of federal legislation to that of the states 270 
 
 Property qualification as a condition of holding office 271 
 
 Qualification of the electors left to the states 272 
 
 Extent of the Jurisdiction of federal tribunals 272 
 
 How the new constitution was to be ratified 273 
 
 Committee of five ordered to report the resolutions of the convention in the 
 
 form of a constitution 274 
 
 Character of Rutledge 274 
 
 Industry of the committee 275 
 
 Anxiety of the country 276 
 
 CHAPTER YI. 
 
 THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES. 
 
 From January 1786 to July 1787. 
 
 The ordinance of 1787. Treaty with the Shawnees 277 
 
 Monroe's journey to the West 277 
 
 Report of a grand committee on the western territory 278 
 
 Monroe's plan for a north-western ordinance 279 
 
 Monroe and restrictions on slavery 279^ 
 
 Certain waters and carrying places declared free. The Connecticut reserve . 279 
 
 The proposed five states in the North-west 280 
 
 Jealousy of the western states. KaskasKias 280 
 
 Urgent need of a territorial government. Progress of the bill . . . 281 
 
 Rufus Putnam's plan for colonizing the West. His appeal to Washington . 282 
 
 Parsons visits the West 283 
 
 Congress quiets the Indian title to a great pari of Ohio 283 
 
 Formation of the Ohio company 284 
 
 Parsons presents its memorial to congress. Effect of the memorial . . 285 
 
 Power of the South 285 
 
 Cutler before congress. Carrington's report 286 
 
 Richard Henry Lee on a new committee of seven 286 
 
 Ordinance for governing the territory of the United States. Its clauses . 287 
 
 Clause on contracts 288 
 
 Grayson and slavery. Nathan Dane and King ". 289 
 
CONTENTS. XV 
 
 PAOK 
 
 History of the clause against slavery 289 
 
 Virginia accepts the ordinance with its exclusion of slavery .... 291 
 
 The rights of the free negro in New Yorii and Virginia .... 291 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION IN DETAIL. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 
 
 From the Sixth of August to the Tenth of September 1787. 
 
 Report of the committee of detail 292 
 
 The constitution a government by the people 292 
 
 Membership of a colony defined. Who arc the people of the United States ? . 293 
 
 The new government a unity in plurality. The tripartite division of powers . 293 
 
 Election of the members of congress 294 
 
 Continuous succession of the government provided for 294 
 
 The new government to be supported from the common treasury . . . 294 
 
 Number of representatives 294 
 
 Qualifications of membership. Discrimination against the foreign-born . 295 
 
 Property qualification rejected 296 
 
 The quorum. Qualifications of electors . , 297 
 
 To be established by each state for itself 298 
 
 Relation of the slave-trade to representation. Of slavery .... 299 
 
 Why slaves should not be represented 299 
 
 The question adjourned. Powers gi-anted to the new government . . . 301 
 
 Power to emit paper money discussed by Hamilton 301 
 
 By Gouverncur Morris 302 
 
 By Mason, Gorham, Mercer, Ellsworth, Randolph, Wilson, and Langdon . 302 
 
 Madison's vote decides that the power shall not be granted .... 303 
 
 How friends of paper money stand in history 303 
 
 Power of the states to emit paper money 304 
 
 The power absolutely prohibited 305 
 
 Power left to the states to interfere with contracts 305 
 
 But not to interfere ex post facto. The terra ex post facto defined . . 306 
 
 Power of the congress to encourage manufactures by impost duties . . 307 
 
 Shall states or the United States encourage manufactures ? . . . . 307 
 
 Power confined to the United States 307 
 
 States not to treat with foreign powers or other states 308 
 
 Slaves and representation 308 
 
 Who are citizens ? Fugitives from justice. Fugitive slaves . . . 309 
 
 CHAPTER Vm. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION IN DETAIL. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS, CONTINUED. 
 
 From the Middle to the End of August 1787. 
 
 The assumption of the state debts. Jurisdiction over crimes . . . 311 
 
 Power to subdue a rebellion 311 
 
 Power of declaring war. General propositions of Madison. The army .312 
 
xvi CONTENTS. 
 
 PAOE 
 
 Navy and militia. Clause on the militia 313 
 
 Compromise on the appointment of militia ofBcers 314 
 
 Power to execute the powers granted. Treason 314 
 
 State laws cannot shield the traiior 314 
 
 Commerce and the slave-trade 315 
 
 Exports exempted from taxation. Debate on continuing the slave-trade . 316 
 
 South Carolina and Georgia threaten to secede 318 
 
 Dickinson hints at a compromise 318 
 
 North Carolina will join South Carolina and Georgia on the question . .319 
 
 The question committed .... 319 
 
 The questions of the slave-trade and of a navigation act committed . . 320 
 
 The compromise of the committee. Final shape of the compromise . . 320 
 
 Slave-trade abolished after twenty years. Doom of slave-holding. . . 321 
 
 Why the British failed in retaining the South 322 
 
 How slaves may emerge into the human character 322 
 
 Grant of power to regulate commerce 323 
 
 The admission of new states within the limits of the United States . . 323 
 
 The admission of new states from abroad permitted 323 
 
 Special provision for the admission of Vermont 324 
 
 Powers of congress over the territory and other property of the United 
 
 States 324 
 
 Limit on the taxation of slaves 325 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 THE PRESIDENT. 
 
 July, August, and September 1787. 
 
 The choice of the president a difficult problem, IIow shall he be chosen? . 326 
 
 Shall he be re-cligible ? 327 
 
 The tenure of good behavior considered 328 
 
 The tenure for seven years with perpetual re-eliiribility .... 328 
 
 Choice by the national legislature and re-eligibility incompatible . . . 328 
 The choice of the president by the argregate people rejected . . . 328 
 The choice by an electoral college. Objections started against it . . . 329 
 
 A triple executive proposed 330 
 
 Pelation of re-eligibility of the executive to the length of the period of office 330 
 Madison likes best the election by the quaUfied part of the people at large . 330 
 The smaller states would have each one vote for two candidates . . . 330 
 The convention votes for a single executive, to be chosen by the legislature 
 
 for seven years, and to be inehgible 331 
 
 The decision not accepted as final. Report of the committee of detail . .332 
 
 Antagonism of the smaller and the large states 332 
 
 The choice of the president by the vote of the states negatived . . . 333 
 
 Subject referred to a committee of eleven 334 
 
 ' Opinions of Gouverneur Morris. Of Sherman 334 
 
 Report of the committee 335 
 
 The president to be voted for in the electoral colleges of the states . . 335 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 xvii 
 
 PAGE 
 
 And the vote to be counted by tlio senate 335 
 
 The plan of leaving so much pov/cr to the senate objected to . . . 836 
 
 Speech of Wilson 337 
 
 Of Hamilton. How the votes were to be counted 338 
 
 The mode of counting in Massachusetts preferred to that of Virginia . . 338 
 
 A summary statement of the metliod adopted 339 
 
 Election of the vice-president 341 
 
 Title of the president. The veto power. Power of pardon . . . .342 
 
 The president commander-in-chief 342 
 
 Restraints proposed on the executive power. A privy council proposed . 343 
 The plan for a council rejected. Relation of the president and the senate . 344 
 Power of war and peace. Over intercourse with foreign states . . . 345 
 
 Power of appointment. Power of removal 345 
 
 Qualifications of the president. Impeachment of the president . ^ - . 346 
 State of the president while on trial. Judgment in case of impeachment . 347 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 THE FEDEKAL JUDICIAEY. 
 
 August and September 1787. 
 
 Report on the federal judiciary. The judiciary and the veto power . . 348 
 
 Proposals of Pinckney 348 
 
 Organization of federal courts 349 
 
 Judges not removable by address. Extent of the judicial power . . . 350 
 
 The judiciary and unconstitutional laws £50 
 
 Senate to try impeachments. To cases beginning and ending in a state . 351 
 The original jurisdiction of the supreme court. Its appellate powers . .351 
 Method of choosing it. The supreme court and legislative encroachments . 352 
 
 Protection against erroneous judgments 352 
 
 By the court. By congress. By the good sense of the land . . . .353 
 Methods of consolidating the union. Of bankruptcies. Of money bills . 354 
 
 Number of the house of representatives 354 
 
 How the constitution was to be ratified 355 
 
 Randolph and Franklin for another federal convention 356 
 
 CHAPTER XI. 
 
 THE LAST DATS OF THE CONVENTION". 
 
 From tlie Twelfth to the Seventeenth of September 1787. 
 
 Final draft of the constitution 
 
 The constitution the institution of a government by the people 
 "Why the names of the thirteen states were left out of the first clause 
 Federal and national. The veto of the president. Of juries 
 Motion for a bill of rights defeated. No title for the president . 
 Of encouraging American manufactures. Servitude and service . 
 How to introduce the constitution. The keeper of the purse 
 Power to cut canals negatived 
 
 357 
 
 357 
 
 357 
 
 358 
 
 359 '.-sS^ 
 
 359 
 
 360 
 
 360 
 
xviii CONTENTS. 
 
 PAOB 
 
 Of a university. No state to trespass on the rights of another state . . 381 
 
 The obligation of contracts 361 
 
 The distribution of representation 362 
 
 Slavery not recognized as a legal condition 362 
 
 Modes of amending the constitution 363 
 
 Mason dreads navigation acts. Indecision of Randolph .... 364 
 
 Firmness of Pinckney 364 
 
 The constitution ordered to be engrossed 365 
 
 Washington's remark to members of the conveation 365 
 
 Speech of Franklin 365 
 
 An amendment adopted at the wish of Washington 366 
 
 Appeals of Morris and Hamilton to every one to sign the constitution . .366 
 
 Three refuse 366 
 
 The constitution signed by every state. Prophecy of Franklin . . . 36*7 
 
 The meditations of Washington 367 
 
 IV,— TEE PEOPLE OF THE STATES IX JUDGMENT ON THE COXSTITU- 
 TIOX. 178T-178S. 
 
 CnAPTER I. 
 
 THE COXSTITUTION IX COXGEESS AND IX VIEGIXIA. 
 
 September to November 1787. 
 
 The constitution received in congress. Opposed in congress . . . 371 
 
 Amendments desired by Lee S72 
 
 Is supported by New York. Propositions of New Jersey .... 373 
 
 Congress against Lee 373 
 
 A compromise agreed upon. Perseverance of Lee 374 
 
 Efforts of Washington in Virginia 375 
 
 Opponents of the constitution in Virginia 376 
 
 Washington wins over Randolph 377 
 
 Monroe writes in favor of adopting the constitution 377 
 
 The legislature of Virginia 377 
 
 The constitution referred to a state convention 378 
 
 But amendments may be proposed in the state convention .... 378 
 
 Plan for a second federal convention 379 
 
 Letters from Washington 379 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE COXSTITUTIOX IX PEXXSYLVAXIA, DELiTVAEE, AND XEW JEESEY ; AXD 
 
 IX GEOEGIA. 
 
 From 18 September 1787 to 2 January 1788. 
 
 Pennsylvania 381 
 
 Franklin presents the constitution to its legislature 382 
 
CONTENTS. xix 
 
 PAOK 
 
 Long debates upon it 382 
 
 Reception of the resolution of congress. A convention called . . . 383 
 
 Lee and Wilson in Pennsylvania • . . . 383 
 
 Prompt meeting of the Pennsylvania convention 384 
 
 Speech of Wilson in favor of the constitution 384 
 
 Opposed by Smilie. And by Whitehiil 386 
 
 On the want of a bill of rights 387 
 
 Speech of Findley 388 
 
 The constitution in the Delaware legislature 389 
 
 The Delaware convention ratifies the constitution 389 
 
 Pennsylvania ratifies the constitution 390 
 
 Act of the legislature of New Jersey 391 
 
 The New Jersey convention ratifies the constitution 391 
 
 The legislature of Georgia 392 
 
 Georgia unanimously ratifies the constitution 392 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION IN CONNECTICUT AND MASSACHUSETTS. 
 
 From 26 September 1787 to 6 February 1788. 
 
 Letter of Sherman and Ellsworth to the governor of Connecticut . . . 393 
 The Connecticut convention. Speeches of Ellsworth and Johnson . . 394 
 
 James Wadsworth and answers to him 394 
 
 Wise conduct of Hancock 395 
 
 Massachusetts calls a convention 395 
 
 Condition of the state. The elections 396 
 
 Samuel Adams. Opening of the convention 397 
 
 Elbridge Gerry. Conduct of Samuel Adams 398 
 
 Objections to the constitution. Property qualifications . . . .398 
 
 Representation of slaves. On a religious test 399 
 
 Period of office for senators. King explains the constitution . . . 399 
 
 Dawes argues for protective duties 399 
 
 The convention wavering 400 
 
 It follows Washington's mode of avoiding a second convention . . . 401 
 
 Objections made and answered 401 
 
 The slave-trade. Hancock proposes resolutions 402 
 
 Supported by Samuel Adams 403 
 
 Amendments referred to a committee 404 
 
 The committee report its approval of the constitution 404 
 
 Objections on the score of the slave-trade 404 
 
 And for the want of a bill of rights 405 
 
 Stillman speaks for the constitution 405 ' 
 
 In what words Hancock proposed the question 405 
 
 The vote. Acquiescence of the opposition 406 
 
 Madison adopts the policy of Massachusetts 406 
 
 Opinions of Jefferson 406 
 
 Of John Adams 408 
 
XX 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 409 
 410 
 410 
 
 OriAPTER IV. 
 
 THE COXSTITUTIOX IN NEW HAMPSHIRE, MARYLAND, AND SOUTH CAROLINA. 
 
 From February to the Twenty-tliird of May 1783. 
 
 The constitution in New Hampshire 
 
 Its convention adjourns. The assembly of Maryland calls a convention 
 The cabals of Virginia. Influence of Washington .... 
 
 The election of a convention in Maryland 410 
 
 Advice of Washington. The convention of Maryland at Annapolis . .411 
 
 Conduct of Chase. Of Paca 412 
 
 Conduct of enemies and friends to the federal government . . . .412 
 
 The constitution ratified. No amendments proposed 413 
 
 Maryland will have no separate confederacy. Hopefulness of Washington . 413 
 The constitution in South Carolina. Attitude of its assembly . . . 414 
 
 Debate between Lowndes and Pinckney 415 
 
 Why there was no bill of rights 418 
 
 Speech of Kutledge. Call of a convention. The convention organized . . 419 
 The constitution ratified. Joy of Gadsden. Effect on New Uampshire . 420 
 
 \ 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION IN YIRGINIA AND IN NEW HAMPSHIRE. 
 
 From May 1785 to the Twenty-fifth of June 1788. 
 
 Jay's negotiation with Gardoqui 
 
 Alarm of the southern states 
 
 Danger of a separation of the southern states 
 
 Failure of the negotiation. Washington 
 
 And Jefferson. Randolph will sapport the constitution 
 
 Effect of the example of Massachusetts on Virginia 
 
 The opposition in the Virginia convention. Madison . 
 
 And Pendleton. Mason. Patrick Henry leads the opposition 
 
 Is replied to by Pendleton and Madison .... 
 
 Praise of the British constitution 
 
 Madison compares the British and American constitutions . 
 Henry speaks against the judiciary system. Marshall defends it 
 The debtor planters. Henry on a separate confederacy 
 
 Mason and Madison on the slave-trade 
 
 And Tyler. Henry fears emancipation by the general government 
 Noble speech of Randolph. Slavery condemned by Johnson 
 
 Navigation of the Mississippi 
 
 Contest between the North and the South .... 
 The power to regulate commerce. The prohibition of paper mone; 
 
 Quieting language of Henry 
 
 The convention refuses a conditional ratification . 
 
 The ratification. Its form. Acquicsc?nce of the opposition . 
 
 New Uampshire ratifies before Virginia .... 
 
 421 
 422 
 422 
 423 
 424 
 425 
 425 
 426 
 427 
 427 
 428 
 429 
 430 
 431 
 432 
 432 
 433 
 433 
 434 
 435 
 436 
 436 
 437 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 XXI 
 
 v.— TEE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. JUNE ITST. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION". 
 
 1787. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 The American constitution. Its forerunners 441 
 
 Its place in the world's history. Individuality the character of Americans . 442 
 
 Why the English language maintained itself 442 
 
 The constitution in harmony with individuality 443 
 
 Freedom of the individual in religion 443 
 
 Slavery an anomaly 444 
 
 Tripai'titc division of the powers of government 445 
 
 Tripartite division of the power of legislation 446 
 
 How the constitution is to be amended . 447 
 
 The United States a continental republic 447 
 
 A federal republic with complete powers of government .... 448 
 
 Powers of the states not by grace, but of right 448 
 
 Sovereignty of the law. Who arc the people of the United States ? . . 449 
 
 Their power. New states to be admitted on equal terms .... 450 
 
 Necessity of revolution provided against 450 
 
 Extending influence of the federal republic ....... 450 
 
 The philosophy of the people 45 1 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE LINGEEING STATES. 
 
 From 1787 to the Second of August 1788. 
 
 The Federalist and its authors 452 
 
 Hamilton and a revenue tariff 453 
 
 Unreasonableness of New York. Organization of the federal republicans . 454 
 Clinton recommends the encouragement of manufactures .... 455 
 New York legislature orders a state convention. The electors . . . 455 
 
 The meeting of the convention deferred till June 455 
 
 Division of parties in New York 455 
 
 Meeting of the convention. Livingston opens the debate .... 456 
 
 Speeches of Lansing, Smith, and Hamilton 456 
 
 News from New Hampshire. Success in New York depends on Virginia . 457 
 
 Hamilton declares his opinions. Clinton replies 457 
 
 News received of the ratification by Virginia 458 
 
 May New York ratify conditionally ? 458 
 
 Debate between Smith and Hamilton. Lansing holds out . . . .459 
 
 Madison condemns a conditional ratification 459 
 
 The opposition in New York give way 460 
 
 But ask for a second federal convention. Joy of New York city . . . 4G0 
 Convention of North Carolina 460 
 
xxu 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 Is divided by parties . ; . . . 
 Amendments proposed. The decision postponed 
 Conduct of llhode Island .... 
 
 PAGB 
 
 461 
 462 
 462 
 
 CHAPTER irr. 
 
 THE FEDEEAL GOVERXilENT OF THE UXITED STATES. 
 
 Erom 1788 to the Fifth of May 1789. 
 
 Relations of America to Europe 
 
 Encroachments of England in Maine and in the West . 
 John Adams returns home. Adams and Jefferson 
 Moderation of the Pennsylvania minority. Albert Gallatin 
 The Virginia assembly demands a second federal convention 
 
 Lee and Grayson elected senators 
 
 Connecticut refuses a second convention. And Massachusetts 
 
 And Pennsylvania. Dilatoriness of congress 
 
 Measures for commencing proceedings under the constitution 
 
 Federal elections in New York 
 
 In Virginia. In South Carolina 
 
 Party divisions. Debates in congress on protection 
 
 Washington sees danger to the union from the South . 
 
 His resolution on leaving Mount Vernon 
 
 His reception at Alexandria. At Baltimore. In Delaware 
 
 At Philadelphia. At Trenton. In New York 
 
 His inauguration. His address to the two houses 
 
 Public prayers in the church. Description of Washing-ton 
 
 Address to him from the senate. From the representatives 
 
 State of Europe at the time 
 
 And of America 
 
 463 
 463 
 464 
 465 
 465 
 465 
 466 
 466 
 466 
 466 
 467 
 468 
 469 
 469 
 470 
 470 
 471 
 472 
 472 
 472 
 474 
 
HISTOET 
 
 OF THE 
 
 FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 OF THE 
 
 Ui^flTED STATES OF AMEEIOA. 
 
 IN FIVE BOOKS, 
 
 I.— THE CONFEDERATION. 
 
 II.-ON" THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION. 
 III.— THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. 
 
 IV.— THE PEOPLE OF THE STATES IN JUDGMENT ON THE 
 CONSTITUTION. 
 
 v.— THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 
 
 TOL. TI. — 1 
 
THE 
 
 FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 OF TH£ 
 
 UJSTITED STATES OF AMERICA. 
 
 m FIVE BOOKS. 
 
 BOOK FIRST. 
 
 THE CONFEDERATION. 
 
 To June 1783. 
 
CHAPTER I. 
 
 A EETROSPECT. EAELY MOVEMENTS TOWAKD UNION. 
 
 1643-1781. 
 
 The order of time brings us to the most cheering act in 
 the political history of mankind, when thirteen repnbhcs, of 
 which at least three reached from the sea to the Mississippi, 
 formed themselves into one federal commonwealth. There 
 was no revolt against the past, but a persistent and healthy 
 progress. The sublime achievement was the work of a people 
 led by statesmen of earnestness, perseverance, and public spirit, 
 instructed by the widest experience in the forms of representa- 
 tive government, and warmed by that mutual love which pro- 
 ceeds from ancient connection, harmonious effort in perils, and 
 common aspirations. 
 
 Scarcely one who wished me good speed when I first es- 
 sayed to trace the history of America remains to greet me 
 with a welcome as I near the goal. Deeply grateful as I am 
 for the friends who rise up to gladden my old age, their en- 
 couragement must renew my grief for those who have gone 
 before me. 
 
 "While so much is changed in the living objects of personal 
 respect and affection, infinitely greater are the transformations 
 in the condition of the world. Power has come to dwell with 
 every people, from the Arctic sea to the Mediterranean, from 
 Portugal to the borders of Russia. From end to end of the 
 United States, the slave has become a freeman ; and the va- 
 rious forms of bondage have disappeared from European 
 Christendom. Abounding harvests of scientific discovery have 
 been garnered by numberless inquisitive minds, and the wild- 
 
6 THE COITFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. . 
 
 est forces of nature have been tanglit to become the docile 
 helpmates of man. The application of steam to the purposes 
 of travel on land and on water, the employment of a spark of 
 light as the carrier of thought across continents and beneath 
 oceans, have made of all the inhabitants of the earth one so- 
 ciety. A journey round the world has become the pastime of 
 a holiday vacation. The morning newspaper gathers up and 
 brings us the noteworthy events of the last f our-and-twenty 
 hours in every quarter of the globe. All states are beginning 
 to form parts of one system. The "new nations,-' which 
 Shakespeare's prophetic eye saw rising on our eastern shore, 
 dwell securely along two oceans, midway between their kin of 
 Great Britain on the one side and the oldest surviving empire 
 on the other. 
 
 More than two thousand years ago it was truly said that 
 the nature of justice can be more easily discerned in a state 
 than in one man.* It may now be studied in the collective 
 states of all the continents. The ignorance and prejudices that 
 come from isolation are worn away in the conflict of the forms 
 , of culture. We learn to think the thought, to hope the hope 
 
 / of mankind. Former times spoke of the dawn of civilization 
 in some one land ; we live in the morning of the world. Day 
 by day the men who guide pubHc affairs are arraigned before 
 
 =^the judgment-seat of the race. A government which adopts 
 a merely selfish policy is pronounced to bo the foe of the hu- 
 man family. The statesman who founds and builds up the 
 well-being of his country on justice has all the nations for a 
 cloud of witnesses, and, as one of our own poets f has said, 
 " The linked hemispheres attest his deed." He thrills the 
 world with joy; and man becomes of a nobler spirit as he 
 learns to gauge his opinions and his acts by a scale commen- 
 surate with his nature. 
 
 History carries forward the study of ethics by following 
 the footsteps of states from the earliest times of which there 
 is a recordL The individual who undertakes to capture truth 
 by solitary thought loses his way in the mazes of speculation, 
 or involves himself in mystic visions, so that the arms which 
 
 * Plato in the Republic, Book ii. Bckker, III., i., 78. 
 f Emerson : The Adirondacks^ 248. 
 
1643-1754. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION. 7 
 
 he extends to embrace wliat are but formless shadows return 
 empty to bis own breast. To find moral trutli^ he must study 
 man in action. The laws of which reason is conscious can be 
 tested best by experience; and inductions will be the more; 
 sure, the larger the experience from which they are drawn.! 
 However great may be the number of those who persuade; 
 themselves that there is in man nothing superior to himself, 
 history interposes with evidence that tyranny and wrong lead ' 
 inevitably to decay; that freedom and right, however hard 
 may be the struggle, always prove resistless. Through this ; 
 assurance ancient nations learn to renew their youth ; the ris- 1 
 ing generation is incited to take a generous part in the grand 
 drama of time ; and old age, staying itself upon sweet Hope 
 as its companion and cherisher,* not bating a jot of courage, 
 nor seeing cause to argue against the hand or the will of a 
 higher power, stands waiting in the tranquil conviction that' 
 the path of humanity is still fresh with the dews of morning,^ 
 that the Redeemer of the nations Hveth. 
 
 The colonies, which became one federal repubhc, were 
 founded by rival powers. That difference of origin and the 
 consequent antagonism of interest were the motives to the first 
 American union. In 1643 three JSTew England colonies joined 
 in a short-lived " confederacy " for mutual protection, espe- 
 cially against the Dutch ; each member reserving its pecuhar 
 jurisdiction and government, and an equal vote in the general 
 council. 
 
 Common danger gave the next impulse to collective action. 
 Rivers, which were the convenient war-paths of the natives, 
 flowed in every direction from the land of the Five Nations ; 
 against whom, in 1684, measures of defence, extending from 
 North Carolina to the northern boundary of New England, 
 were concerted. Later, in 1751, South Carolina joined north- 
 em colonies in a treaty with the same tribes. 
 
 On the side of England, James II., using the simple method 
 of the prerogative of an absolute king, began the suppression 
 of colonial legislatures, and the consolidation of colonies under 
 
 * y\vK€id ot Kapdiav ardWoiffa yi^porpS^os ffvvaopu iKiris. Pindar in Plato, 
 Republic, Book i. Bekker, III., i., 10. 
 
THE OOITFEDERATIOK 
 
 I. : CH. I. 
 
 the rule of one governor. After tlie English revolution of 
 1688 had gained consistency, the responsible government which 
 it established would gladly have devised one uniform system 
 of colonial administration ; and in 1696 the newly created board 
 of trade, of which John Locke was a member, suggested the 
 appointment of a captain-general of all the forces on the conti- 
 nent of North America, with such power as could be exer- 
 cised through the prerogative of a constitutional king. 
 
 In 1697 William Penn appeared before the board and ad- 
 vised an annual " congress " of two delegates from each one of 
 the American provinces, to determine by plurality of voices 
 the ways and means for supporting their union, providing for 
 their safety, and regulating their commerce. 
 
 In 1721, to ensure the needed co-operation of the colonies 
 in the rivalry of England with France for !North American 
 territory, the plan attributed to Lord Stairs provided for a lord- 
 lieutenant or captain-general over them all ; and for a general 
 council to which each provincial assembly should send two of 
 its members, electing one of the two in alternate years. The 
 lord-heutenant of the king, in conjunction with the general 
 council on behalf of the colonies, was then to allot the quotas 
 of men and money which the several assemblies were to raise 
 by laws of their own. All these projects slumbered among 
 heaps of neglected papers. 
 
 On the final struggle between England and France, the 
 zeal of the colonists surpassed that of the mother country. 
 A union, proposed by Franklin in 1754, would have pre- 
 served the domestic institutions of the several colonies. For 
 the affairs of the whole, a governor-general was to be appoint- 
 ed from England, and a legislature, in which the representa- 
 tion would have borne some proportion to population, was to 
 be chosen triennially by the colonies. This plan, which fore- 
 shadowed the present constitution of the Dominion of Canada 
 and the federation which with hope and applause was lately 
 offered by rival ministries to South Africa, was at that day 
 rejected by the British government with abhorrence and dis- 
 dain. 
 
 The English administration confined itself next to methods 
 for obtaining a colonial revenue. For this end Lord Halifax, 
 
1754-1776. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION. 9 
 
 in 1754, advised that the commander-in-chief, attended by one 
 commissioner from each colony, whose election should be sub- 
 ject to one negative of the king by the royal council and 
 another by the royal governor, should adjust the quotas of 
 each colony, which were then to be enforced by the authority 
 of parliament. This plan was suppressed by impending war. 
 
 Great Britain having, with the lavish aid of her colonies,, 
 driven France from Canada, needed them no more as allies in 
 war. From 17G2 to 1765 the problem was how to create a grand 
 system of empire. James Otis, of Boston, would have had all 
 kingdoms and all outlying possessions of the crown wrought 
 into the flesh and blood and membership of one organization ; 
 but this advice, which would have required home govern- 
 ments for every kingdom and for every colony, and, for general 
 affairs, one imperial parliament representing the whole, found 
 no favor. 
 
 In those days of aristocratic rule, the forming of a grand 
 plan of union was assigned by the Bedford faction to George 
 Grenville, a statesman bred to the law, the impersonation of 
 idolatry of the protective system as the source of British pros- 
 perity, and of faith in the omnipotence of the British parlia- 
 ment as the groundwork of British hberty. He sought to 
 unite the thirteen colonies in their home administration by the 
 prerogative ; in their home legislation by a royal veto of acts 
 of their own legislatures ; in the establishment of their general 
 revenue and the regulation of their commerce by acts of the 
 British parliament. 
 
 And now came into the view of the world the rare aptitude 
 of the colonies for concert and organization. James Otis, in 
 the general court of Massachusetts, spoke the word for an 
 American congress, and in 1705 nine of the thirteen met at 
 New York : the British parliament aimed at consolidating their 
 administration without their own consent, and did but force 
 them to unite in the denial of its power. 
 
 The truest and greatest Englishman of that century breasted 
 the heaving wave and by his own force stayed it, but only for 
 the moment. An aristocratic house of commons, piqued and 
 vexed at its own concession, imposed a tax on the colonies in 
 the least hateful form that it could devise ; and in 1773 the 
 
10 THE CONFEDERATION-. b. i. ; ch. i. 
 
 sound of tea-chests, falling into Boston harbor, startled the nar 
 tions with the news of a united and resistant America. 
 
 In 1774 the British parliament thought proper to punish 
 Boston and attempt coercion by arms ; " delegates of the in- 
 habitants " of twelve American colonies in a continental con- 
 gress acted as one in a petition to the king. 
 
 The petition was not received. Six months before the 
 declaration of independence, Thomas Paine, in " Common 
 Sense," had written and published to the world : " IS'othing but 
 a continental form of government can keep the peace of the 
 continent.* Let a continentai. conference be held,t to frame 
 a CONTINENTAL CHAETEE, drawing the line of business and juris- 
 diction between members of congress and members of as- 
 sembly, always remembering that our strength and happiness 
 are continental, not provincial.:}: The bodies chosen conform- 
 ably to said charter shall be the legislators and governors of 
 this continent.* We have every opportunity and every en- 
 com^agement to form the noblest, purest constitution on the 
 face of the earth." | The continental convention which was 
 to frame the constitution for the union was to represent both 
 the colonies and the people of each colony ; its members were 
 to be chosen, two by congress from the delegation of each 
 colony, two by the legislature of each colony out of its own 
 body, and five directly by the people.''' 
 
 Great Britain offered its transatlantic dominions no unity 
 but under a parliament in which they were not represented ; 
 the people of thirteen colonies by special instructions to their 
 delegates in congress, on the fourth of July 1776, declared 
 themselves to be states, independent and united, and began the 
 search for a fitting constitution. 
 
 In their first formative effort they missed the plain road of 
 Enghsh and American experience. They had rightly been 
 jealous of extending the supremacy of England, because it was 
 a government outside of themselves; they now applied that 
 jealousy to one another, forgetting that the general power 
 
 * Common Sense : original edition of 8 January 1776, p. 51. 
 
 f Ibid., 55. X Ibid., 56. » Ibid., 56. 
 
 I Appendix, annexed to second edition of Common Sense, 14 February IIIQ. 
 
 ^ Common Sense, original edition, 65. 
 
1776-1780. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION. H 
 
 would be in their own hands. Joseph Hawley of Massachu- 
 setts had, in ]S"ovember 1775, advised annual parliaments of two 
 houses ; the committee for framing the confederation, misled 
 partly by the rooted distrust for which the motive had ceased, 
 and partly by erudition which studied Hellenic councils and 
 leagues as well as later confederacies, took for its pattern the 
 constitution of the United Provinces, with one house and no 
 central power of final decision. These evils were nearly fatal 
 to the United Provinces themselves, although every one of 
 them could be reached by a messenger within a day's journey ; 
 and he^e was a continent of states which could not be consulted 
 without the loss of many months, and would ever tend to an- 
 archy from the want of agreement in their sej)arate delibera- 
 tions^ 
 
 Hopeless of a good result from the deliberations of con- 
 gress on a confederation, Edward .Hutledge, in August 1778, 
 in a letter to Pobert R. Livingston, avowed his readiness to 
 " propose that the states should appoint a special congress, to 
 be composed of new members, for this purpose." * 
 
 The necessities of the war called into being, north of the 
 Potomac, successive conventions of a cluster of states. In Au- 
 gust 1780, a convention of the ISTew England states at Boston 
 declared for a more solid and permanent union with one su- 
 preme head, and " a congress competent for the government 
 of all those common and national affairs which do not nor can 
 come within the jurisdiction of the particular states." At the 
 same time it issued an invitation for a convention of the 
 ISTew England states, New York, and " others that shall think 
 proper to join them," f to meet at Hartford. 
 
 The legislature of l^ew York approved the measure. J 
 " Our embarrassments in the prosecution of the war," such 
 was the message of Governor George Clinton on the fourth of 
 September, at the opening of the session, " are chiefly to be 
 attributed to a defect of power in those who ought to exercise 
 a supreme jurisdiction ; for, while congress only recommends 
 and the different states deliberate upon the propriety of the 
 
 * Rutledge to Livingston, August 1776. MS. 
 
 f Hough's Convention of New England States at Boston, 50, 52. 
 
 X Duane to Washington, 19 September 1780. Letters to Washington, iii., 92. 
 
12 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. i. 
 
 recommendation, we cannot expect a union of force or coun- 
 cil." The senate answered in the words of PhiUp Schuyler : 
 " We perceive the defects of the present system, and the ne- 
 cessity of a supreme and coercive power in the government of 
 these states ; and are persuaded that, unless congress are au- 
 thorized to direct uncontrollably the operations of w^ar and 
 enabled to enforce a compliance with their requisitions, the 
 common force can never be properly united." * 
 
 Meantime Alexander Hamilton in swiftness of thought 
 outran all that was possible. Early in September, in a private 
 letter to James Duane, then a member of congress, he took up 
 the proposal, which, nearly five years before, Thomas Paine 
 had made known, and advised that a convention of all the 
 states should meet on the first of the following November, 
 with full authority to conclude finally and set in motion a 
 " vigorous " general confederation.f His ardor would have 
 surprised the people into greater happiness without giving 
 them an opportunity to view and reject his project.:}: 
 
 Before the end of the year the author of " Common Sense " 
 himself, publishing in Philadelphia a tract asserting the right 
 of the United States to the vacant western territory, closed his 
 argument for the " Public Good " with these words : " I take 
 the opportunity of renewing a hint which I formerly threw 
 out in the pamphlet ' Common Sense,' and which the several 
 states will, sooner or later, see the convenience, if not the ne- 
 cessity, of adopting; which is, that of electing a continental 
 convention, for the purpose of forming a continental constitu- 
 tion, defining and describing the powers of congress. To have 
 them marked out legally will give additional energy to the 
 whole, and a new confidence to the several parts." * 
 
 " Call a convention of the states, and establish a congress 
 upon a constitutional footing," wrote Greene, after taking 
 command of the southern army, to a member of congress. 1 
 
 On the eleventh of November able representatives fron^ 
 
 * Hough's Convention, 63-65. 
 
 f Hamilton to Duane, 3 September 1*780. Hamilton, i., 157. 
 I Compare McHenry to Hamilton. Hamilton, i., 411. 
 
 * Thomas Paine's Public Good. Original edition, 38. 
 I Johnson's Life of Greene, ii., 446. 
 
1780-1781. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION". 13 
 
 eacli of the four 'New England states and JSTew York — John 
 T. Gilman of New Hampshire, Thomas Gushing, Azor Orne, 
 and George Partridge of Massachusetts, William Bradford of 
 Khode Island, Eliphalet Dyer and William Williams of Con- 
 necticut, John Sloss Hobart and Egbert Benson of New York 
 — assembled at Hartford.* ^ The lead in the convention was 
 taken by the delegates from New York, Hobart, a judge of its 
 supreme court, and Benson, its attorney-general. f At their 
 instance it was proposed, as a foundation for a safe system of 
 finance, to provide by taxes or duties a certain and inalien- 
 able revenue, to discharge the interest on any funded part of 
 the public debt, and on future loans. As it had proved im- 
 possible to get at the valuation of lands, congress should be 
 empowered to aj)portion taxes on the states according to their 
 number of inhabitants, black as well as white. They then 
 prepared a circular letter to all the states, in which they said : 
 " Our embarrassments arise from a defect in the present gov- 
 ernment of the United States. All government supposes the 
 power of coercion ; this power, however, never did exist in the 
 general government of the continent, or has never been exer- 
 cised. Under these circumstances, the resources and force of 
 the country can never be properly united and drawn forth. 
 The states individually considered, while they endeavor to 
 retain too much of their independence, may finally lose the 
 whole. By the expulsion of the enemy we may be emanci- 
 pated from the tyranny of Great Britain ; we shall, however, 
 be without a solid hope of peace and freedom unless we are 
 properly cemented among ourselves." 
 
 The proceedings of this convention were sent to every state 
 in the union, to Washington, and to congress. J They were 
 read in congress on the tweKth of December 1780 ; and were 
 
 * The narac3 of all the delegates are given in Papers of the Old Congress, 
 xxxiii., 391, MS. 
 
 f That New York took the lead appears from comparison of the message of 
 Clinton in September and the circular letter of the convention ; and from the 
 public tribute of Hamilton to the New York delegates in the presence of Hobart. 
 Hamilton, ii., 360. 
 
 X Papers of the Old Congress, xxxiii., 391, containing copies of the credentials 
 of the commissioners, the resolutions of the convention, and its letters to the 
 several states, to congress, and to Washington. MS. 
 
14 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; on. i. 
 
 referred to a committee of five, on which were John Wither- 
 spoon and James Madison,* the master and his pupil. In the 
 same days Pennsylvania instructed its delegates in congress 
 that imposts on trade were absolutely necessary ; and, in order 
 to prevent any state from taking advantage of a neighbor, 
 congress should recommend to the several states in union a 
 system of imposts.f Before the end of 1Y80 the legislative 
 council and general assembly of JSTew Jersey, while they in- 
 sisted " that the rights of every state in the union should be 
 strictly maintained," declared that " congress represent the 
 federal republic." J Thus early was that name applied to the 
 United States. Both branches of the legislature of J^ew York, 
 which at that time was " as well disposed a state as any in the 
 union," * approved the proceedings of the convention as pro- 
 moting the interest of the continent. | 
 
 With the year 1781, when the ministry of Great Britain 
 believed themselves in possession of the three southernmost 
 states and were cheering Cornwallis to complete his glory by 
 the conquest of Virginia ; when congress was confessedly with- 
 out the means to recover the city of New York ; when a large 
 contingent from France was at Newport, serious efforts for 
 the creation of a federal republic began, and never ceased until 
 it was established. The people of New York, from motives 
 of the highest patriotism, had already ceded its claims to west- 
 em lands. The territory north-west of the Ohio, which Yir- 
 ginia had conquered, was on the second of January ^ surren- 
 dered to the United States of America. For this renunciation 
 one state and one state only had made delay. On the twenty- 
 ninth, congress received the news so long anxiously waited for, 
 that Maryland by a resolution of both branches of her legis- 
 lature had acceded to the confederation, seven members only 
 in the house voting in the negative. Duane, who had been 
 taught by "Washington that " greater powers to congress were 
 indispensably necessary to the well-being and good government 
 
 * Endorsement by Charles Thomson, secretary of congress. MS. 
 f Journals o' Assembly, 564. 
 
 X Representation and Remonstrance, printed in Mulford's New Jersey, 469 
 470. # Washington to Jefferson, 1 August 1786. Sparks, ix., 186. 
 
 I Journals of Assembly, 91, 93. 
 ^ Journal of Virginia House of Delegates, 79. 
 
1781. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION". 15 
 
 of public affairs," "^ instantly addressed him : " Let ns devote 
 this day to joy and congratulation, since by the accomplishment 
 of our federal union we are become a nation. In a political 
 view it is of more real importance than a victory over all our 
 enemies. "We shall not fail of taking advantage of the favor- 
 able temper of the states and recommending for ratification 
 such additional articles as will give vigor and authority to gov- 
 ernment." f The enthusiasm of the moment could not hide 
 the truth, that without amendments the new system would 
 struggle vainly for life. Washington answered : "Our affairs 
 will not put on a different aspect unless congress is vested with, 
 or will assume, greater powers than they exert at present." :j: 
 
 To John Sullivan of New Hampshire, another member of 
 congress, "Washington wrote : " I never expect to see a happy 
 termination of the war, nor great national concerns well con- 
 ducted in peace, till there is something more than a recom- 
 mendatory power in congress. The last words, therefore, of 
 my letter and the first wish of my heart concur in favor of 
 it."# 
 
 The legislature of Maryland swiftly transformed its resolu- 
 tion into an act. The delegates having full authority, in the 
 presence of congress, on the first day of March, subscribed the 
 articles of confederation, and its complete, formal, and final 
 ratification by all the United States was announced to the pub- 
 lic ; to the executives of the several states ; to the American 
 ministers in Europe, and through them to the courts at which 
 they resided; to the minister plenipotentiary of France in 
 America 4 to the commander-in-chief, and through him to the 
 army. II Clinton communicated " the important event" to the 
 legislature of New York, adding : " This great national com- 
 pact establishes our union." "^ But the completion of the con- 
 federation was the instant revelation of its insufficiency, and 
 the summons to the people of America to form a better con- 
 stitution. 
 
 * Washington to James Duane, 26 December 17S0. MS. 
 f Jivmes Duane to Washington, 29 January 1781. 
 
 X Washington to Duane, 19 February 1781. 
 
 * Washington to Sullivan, 4 February 1781. Sparks, vii., 402. 
 I Journals of Congress, iii., 681, 682, 591. 
 
 ^ Journal of New York Assembly, for 19 March 1781. 
 
16 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. i. 
 
 "Washington rejoiced that Virginia had relinquished her 
 claim to the land south of the great lakes and north-west of 
 the Ohio, which, he said, " for fertility of soil, pleasantness of 
 climate, and other natural advantages, is equal to any known 
 tract of country of the same extent in the universe." * He 
 was pleased that Maryland had acceded to the confederation ; 
 but he saw no ground to rest satisfied. 
 
 On taking command of the army in Massachusetts in 1775, 
 he at once discriminated between the proper functions of indi- 
 vidual colonies and " tliat power and weight which ought of 
 right to belong only to the whole ; " f and he applied to Eich- 
 ard Henry Lee, then in congress, for aid in establishing the 
 distinction. In the following years he steadily counselled the 
 formation of one continental army. As a faithful laborer in 
 the cause, as a man injuring his private estate without the 
 smallest personal advantage, as one who wished the prosperity 
 of America most devoutly, he in the last days of 1778 had 
 pleaded with the statesmen of Yirginia for that which to him 
 was more than life. He called on Benjamin Harrison, then 
 speaker of the house of delegates, on Mason, AYy the, Jefferson, 
 Nicholas, Pendleton, and J^elson, "not to be satisfied with 
 places in their own state while the common interests of Ameri- 
 ca were mouldering and sinking into irretrievable ruin, but to 
 attend to the momentous concerns of an empire." :j: " Till 
 the great national interest is fixed upon a solid basis," so he 
 wrote, in March 1779, to George Mason, "I lament the fatal 
 policy of the states of employing their ablest men at home. 
 How useless to put in fine order the smallest parts of a clock 
 unless the great spring which is to set the wliole in motion is 
 well attended to ! Let this voice call forth you, Jefferson, and 
 others to save their country." * But now, with deeper emo- 
 tion, he turns to his OAvn state as he had done in the gloomy 
 winter of 1778. He has no consolation but in the hope of a 
 good federal government. His growing desire has the charac- 
 ter of the forces of nature, which from the opening year in- 
 crease in power till the earth is renewed. 
 
 * Wasliington to Sullivan, 4 February 1781. Sparks, vii,, 400. 
 
 f "Washington to Richard H. Lee, 29 August lYYS. Sparks, iii,, 68, 69. 
 
 X Sparks, vl, 150. * See above, v., 298, 319. 
 
1781. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UjSTION. I7 
 
 A constant, close observer of wliat Vv^as done bj Yirginia, 
 lie beld in mind that on the twenty-fourth day of December 
 1Y79, on occasion of some unwise proceedings of congress, she 
 had resolved " that the legislature of this commonwealth are 
 greatly alarmed at the assumption of power lately exercised by 
 congress. While the right of recommending measures to each 
 state by congress is admitted, we contend for that of judging 
 of their utility and expediency, and of course either to approve 
 or reject. Making any state answerable for not agreeing to 
 any of its recommendations would establish a dangerous prece- 
 dent against the authority of the legislature and the sovereignty 
 of the separate states." * 
 
 This interposition of the Yirginia legislature so haunted 
 "Washington's mind that he felt himself more particularly im- 
 pelled to address with freedom men of whose abilities and judg- 
 ments he wished to avail himself. He thoroughly understood 
 the obstinacy and strength of opinion which he must encounter 
 and overcome. His native state, reaching to the Mississippi and 
 dividing the South from the T^orth, held, from its geographical 
 place, its numbers, and the influence of its statesmen, a power 
 of obstructing union such as belonged to no other state. Pie 
 must persuade it to renounce some share of its individual sov- 
 ereignty and forego " the liberty to reject or alter any act of 
 congress which in a full representation of states has been sol- 
 emnly_debatgd-aad,. decided on," f or there is no hope of con- 
 solidating the union. His position was one of extreme deli- 
 cacy ; for he was at the head of the army which could alone 
 be employed to enforce the requisitions of congress. He there- 
 fore selected, as the Virginians to whom he could safely ad- 
 dress himseK, the three great civilians whom that common- 
 wealth had appointed to codify its laws and adapt them to the 
 new state of society consequent on independence, Jefferson, 
 its governor, Pendleton, the president of its court of appeals, 
 and Wythe, its spotless chancellor. J 
 
 * Journal of House of Delegates of Virginia, for 24 December I'ZVO, 103. 
 
 f Washington to James Duane, 26 December I'TSO. 
 
 I Washington to Jefferson, Pendleton, and Wythe, Madison Papers, 83, Gil- 
 pin's edition. The date of the letter is not given. It was written soon after the 
 accession of Maryland to the confederation ; probably in February, before the mid- 
 dle of the month, which was the time fixed for his departure from New Windsor 
 
 VOL. VI. — 2 
 
18 THE CONFEDERATIOK b. i. ; ch. i. 
 
 " The alliance of tlie states," he said, " is now complete. 
 If the powers granted to the respective body of the states are 
 inadequate, the defects should be considered and remedied. 
 Danger may spring from delay ; good will result from a timely 
 application of a remedy. The present temper of the states is 
 friendly to the establishment of a lasting union ; the moment 
 should be improved ; if suffered to pass away it may never 
 return, and, after gloriously and successfully contending against 
 the usurpations of Britain, we may fall a prey to our own fol- 
 lies and disputes." He argued for the power of compelling 
 the states to comply with the requisitions for men and money 
 agreeably to their respective quotas ; adding : \' It wotrld give 
 me concern should it be thought of me that I am desirous of 
 enlarging the powers of congress unnecessarily ; I declare to 
 God, my only aim is the general good." And he promised 
 to make his views known to others besides the three. 
 
 His stepson, John Parke Custis, who was just entering into 
 public life, he thus instructed : " The fear of giving sufficient 
 powers to congress is futile. Under its present constitution, 
 each assembly will be annihilated, and we must once more 
 return to the government of Great Britain, and be made to 
 kiss the rod preparing for our correction. A nominal head, 
 which at present is but another name for congress, will no 
 longer do. That honorable body, after hearing the interests 
 and views of the several states fairly discussed and explained 
 by their respective representatives, ];nust dictate, and not merely 
 recommend." * 
 
 To another Yirginian, Joseph Jones of King George coun- 
 ty, whom he regarded with sincere affection and perfect trust, 
 he wrote : " Without a controlling j)ower in congress it will 
 be impossible to carry on the war ; and we shall speedily be 
 
 for Newport. The dates of the letters of 1781, informing him of the accession 
 of Maryland, were, from Duanc, 29 January, MS. ; from Sullivan, 29 January, MS. ; 
 fi-om Matthews, 30 January. Letters to Washington, iii., 218. Washington's 
 answer to Sullivan is 4 February, Sparks, vii., 402 ; to Matthews, 14 February. 
 " The confederation being now closed will, I trust, enable congress to speak de- 
 cisively in their requisitions," etc. :MS. On the evening of the fourteenth, Wash- 
 ington was preparing to leave for Newport ; an unexpected letter from Rocham- 
 beau detained him in camp till the second of March. Sparks, vii., 446, note. 
 * Washington to John Parke Custis, 28 February IVSl. Sparks, vii., 440-444. 
 
1781. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION. 19 
 
 thirteen distinct states, each pursuing its local interests, till 
 they are annihilated in a general crash. The fable of the 
 bunch of sticks may well be applied to us." '^' In a like strain 
 he addressed other trusty correspondents and friends, f His 
 v/ants as commander-in-chief did not confine his attention to 
 the progress of the war ; he aimed at nothing less than an en- 
 during government for all times of war and peace. 
 
 As soon as the new form of union was proclaimed, congress 
 saw its want of real authority, and sought a way to remedy the 
 defect. A report by Madison, from a committee, J was com- 
 pleted on the twelfth and read in congress on the sixteenth of 
 March ; and this was its reasoning : " The articles of confeder- 
 ation, which declare that every state shall abide by the deter- 
 minations of congress, imply a general power vested in con- 
 gress to enforce them and carry them into effect. The United 
 States in congress assembled, being desirous as far as possible 
 to cement and invigorate the federal union, recommend to the 
 legislature of every state to give authority to employ the force 
 of the United States as well by sea as by land to compel the 
 states to fulfil their federal engagements." * 
 
 Madison enclosed to Jefferson a copy of his report, and, on 
 account of the delicacy and importance of the subject, ex- 
 pressed a wish for his judgment on it before it should undergo 
 the final decision of congress. No direct reply from him is 
 preserved, || but Joseph Jones, who, after a visit to Richmond, 
 
 * Washington to Joseph Jones, 24 March 1781. MS. 
 
 f Compare his letters to R, R. Livingston of New York, 31 January 1781 — 
 Sparks, vii., 891 ; to John Sullivan of New Hampshire, 4 February 1781 — Sparks 
 vii., 401, 402; to John Matthews of South Caroh'na, 14 February 1781, MS.; to 
 James Duane of New York, 19 February 1781, MS. ; to Philip Schuyler of New 
 York, 20 February 1781, MS. ; to John Parke Custis of Virginia, 28 February 
 1781 — Sparks, vii,, 442; to William Gordon, in Massachusetts, 9 March 1781 — 
 Sparks, vii , 448 ; to Joseph Jones of King George, Virginia, 24 March 1781, MS. ; 
 to John Armstrong of Pennsylvania, 26 March 1781 — Sparks, vii., 403. 
 
 :}: Reports of committees on increasing the powers of congress, p. 19. MS. 
 
 * Madison Papers, Gilpin's edition, 88-90. Reports of committees, 20, 22. 
 MS. Madison was a member of the committee to which were referred the papers 
 from the Hartford convention of November 1780. That committee, on the six- 
 teenth of February 1781, made a report, which was referred back to it. Whether 
 Madison's report of the twelfth of March proceeded from that committee, the im- 
 perfect record does not show. 
 
 I! None of the letters of Jefferson to Madison of this year have been preserved. 
 
20 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; en. i. 
 
 was again in Philadelpliia about the middle of May, gave to 
 Madison a copy of the letter of Washington to Jefferson and 
 his two associates.* There were no chances that the proposal 
 of Madison would be approved by any one state, yet on the 
 second of May it was referred to a grand committee ; that is, 
 to a committee of one from each state.f On the eighteenth 
 the Chevalier de la Luzerne, then the French minister in 
 America, sent this dispatch to Yergennes : " There is a feeling 
 to reform the constitution of congress ; but the articles of con- 
 federation, defective as they are, cost a year and a half of labor 
 and of debates ; a change will not encounter less diflSculty, and 
 it appears to me there is more room for desire than for hope." j;. 
 Even while he was writing, the movement for reform re- 
 ceived a new impulse. In a pamphlet dated the twenty-fourth, 
 and dedicated to the congress of the United States of America 
 and to the assembly of the state of Pennsylvania, William 
 Barton * insisted that congress should " not be left with the 
 mere shadow of sovereign authority, without the right of 
 exacting obedience to their ordinances, and destitute of the 
 means of executing their resolves." To remedy this evil he 
 did not look to congress itself, but " indicated the necessity of 
 their calling a continental convention, for the express purpose 
 of ascertaining, defining, enlarging, and limiting the duties 
 and powers of their constitution." I This is the third time 
 that the suggestion of a general constituent convention was 
 brought before the country by the press of Philadelphia. 
 
 * Madison Papers, Gilpin's edition, 81. 
 
 f Reports of committees on increasing the powers of congress, 22. MS. 
 X Luzerne to Vergennes, 18 May 1Y81, MS. 
 
 * Not by Pelatiab Webster, as stated by Madison. Madison Papers, Gilpin's 
 edition, 706; Elliot's stereotyped reprint, 117. First: at a later period, Webster 
 collected his pamphlets in a volume, and this one is not among them ; a dis- 
 claimer which, under the circumstances, is conclusive. The style of this pamphlet 
 of 1781 is totally unlike the style of Pelatiah Webster. Through my friend F. 
 D. Stone of Philadelphia I have seen the bill for printing the pamphlet ; it was 
 made out against William Barton and paid by him. Further : Barton from time 
 to time wrote pamphlets, of which, on a careful comparison, the style, language, 
 and forms of expression are found to correspond to this pamphlet published in 
 1781. Without doubt it was written by William Barton. 
 
 I Observations on the Nature and Use of Paper Credit, etc., Philadelphia, 
 1781, 37. The preface of the pamphlet is dated 24 May 1781. 
 
1781. EAKLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION. 21 
 
 The grand committee of thirteen delayed their report till 
 the twentieth of July, and then only expressed a wish to give 
 congress power in time of war to lay an embargo at least for 
 sixty days, and to appoint receivers of the money of the United 
 States as soon as collected by state officers. By their advice 
 the business was then referred to a committee of three.* 
 
 Day seemed to break when, on the twentieth of July, Ed- 
 mund Eandolph, who had just brought from Yirginia the 
 news of its disposition to strengthen the general government, 
 OHver Ellsworth of Connecticut, and James M. Yarnum of 
 Rhode Island, three of the ablest lawyers in their states, were 
 selected to "prepare an exposition of the confederation, to 
 devise a plan for its complete execution, and to present sup- 
 plemental articles." f 
 
 In support of the proceedings of congress, Hamilton, during 
 July and August, published a series of papers which he called 
 " The Continentalist." " There is hardly a man," said he, 
 "who will not acknowledge the confederation unequal to a 
 vigorous prosecution of the war, or to the preservation of the 
 union in peace. The federal government, too weak at first, 
 will continually grow weaker.":]: "Already some of the 
 states have evaded or refused the demands of congress ; the 
 currency is depreciated ; public credit is at the lowest ebb ; our 
 army deficient in numbers and unprovided with everything ; 
 the enemy making an alarming progress in the southern states ; 
 Cornwallis still formidable to Yirginia. As in explanation of 
 our embarrassments nothing can be alleged to the disaffection 
 of the people, we must have recourse to impolicy and misman- 
 agement in their rulers. We ought, therefore, not only to 
 strain every nerve to render the present campaign as decisive 
 as possible, but we ought, without delay, to enlarge the powers 
 of congress. Every plan of which this is not the foundation 
 will be illusory. The separate exertions of the states will 
 never sufiice. I^othing but a well-proportioned exertion of 
 the resources for the whole, under the direction of a common 
 
 * Report of the grand committee. MS. 
 f Report of the committee of three. 
 
 X Continentalist, Reprinted in J. C. Hamilton's edition of the Federalist, 
 cxl., cxli., cxlv., cxlvi., cxivii., cxlviii. 
 
22 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; ch. i. 
 
 council with power sufficient to give efficacy to their resolu- 
 tions, can preserve us from being a conquered people now, or 
 can make us a happy one hereafter." 
 
 The committee of three, Randolph, Ellsworth, and Yar- 
 nuni, made their report on the twenty-second of August. 
 They declined to prepare an exposition of the confederation, 
 because such a comment would be voluminous if co-extensive 
 with the subject ; and, in the enumeration of powers, omissions 
 would become an argument against their existence. With pro- 
 fessional exactness they explained in twenty-one cases the 
 " manner " in which " the confederation required execution." 
 As to dehnquent states, they advised, " That — as America be- 
 came a confederate republic to crush the present and future 
 foes of her independence ; as of this republic a general coun- 
 cil is a necessary organ ; and as, without the extension of its 
 power, war may receive a fatal inclination and peace be ex- 
 posed to daily convulsions — it be resolved to recommend to 
 the several states to authorize the United States in congress 
 assembled to lay embargoes and prescribe rules for impressing 
 property in time of war ; to appoint collectors of taxes re- 
 quired by congress ; to admit new states with the consent of 
 any dismembered state ; to establish a consular system without 
 reference to the states individually ; to distrain the property of 
 a state delinquent in its assigned proportion of men and money ; 
 and to vary the rules of suffrage in congress so as to decide 
 the most important questions by the agreement of two thirds 
 of the United States." * 
 
 It was further proposed to make a representation to the 
 several states of the necessity for these supplemental powers, 
 and of pursuing in their development one uniform plan. 
 
 At the time when this report was made the country was 
 rousing its energies for a final campaign. New England with 
 its militia assisted to man the lines near l!^ew York ; the com- 
 mander-in-chief with his army had gone to meet Comwallis in 
 Yirginia ; and Greene was recovering the three southernmost 
 states. Few persons in that moment of suspense cared to read 
 the political essays of Hamilton, and he hastened to take part 
 in the war under the command of Lafayette. The hurry of 
 
 * Reports on increasing the powers of congress. 
 
1781. EARLY MOVEMENTS TOWARD UNION. 23 
 
 crowded hours left no opportunity for deliberation on tlie re- 
 form of tlie constitution. Moreover, the committee of three, 
 while they recognised the duty of obedience on the part of the 
 states to -the requisitions of congress, knew no way to force 
 men into the ranks of the army, or distrain the property of a 
 state. There could be no coercion ; for every state was a de- 
 linquent. Had it been otherwise, the coercion of a state by 
 force of arms is civil war, and, from the weakness of the con- 
 federacy and the strength of organization of each separate 
 state, the attempt at coercion would have been disunion. 
 
 Yet it was necessary for the public mind to pass through 
 this process of reasoning. The conviction that the confederacy 
 could propose no remedy for its weakness but the impractica- 
 ble one of the coercion of sovereign states compelled the search 
 for a really efficient and more humane form of government. 
 Meantime the report of Randolph, Ellsworth, and Yarnum, 
 which was the result of the deliberations of nearly eight 
 months, fell to the ground. We shall not have to wait long 
 for a word from Washington ; and, when he next speaks, he 
 will propose " a new constitution." 
 
24: THE CONFEDERATION. B.i.;oH.n. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE STEUGGLE FOR EEYENUE. 
 
 1781-1782. 
 
 Schuyler had been led hy his own experience to perceive 
 the necessity for the states to surrender some part of their 
 sovereignty, and " adopt another system of government." On 
 the twenty-first of January 1781 he moved in the senate of 
 'New York to request the eastern states to join in an early 
 convention, which should form a perpetual league of incorpo- 
 ration, subservient, however, to the common interest of all the 
 states; invite others to accede to it; erect Vermont into a 
 state ; devise a fund for the redemption of the common debts ; 
 substitute a permanent and uniform system for temporary 
 expedients ; and invest the confederacy with powers of coer- 
 cion.* 
 
 " We stand ready on our part to confer adequate powers 
 on congress," was the message of both houses to that body in 
 a letter of the fifth of February, written in the name of the 
 state by their joint committee, on which were Schuyler and 
 Benson, f 
 
 "Washington had been taught by his earliest observation as 
 general, and had often declared the indispensable necessity of 
 more responsibility and permanency in the executive bodies. J 
 The convention at Boston of August 1780 had recommended 
 
 * Schuyler to Washington, 21 January 1Y81. Letters to Washington, iii., 213. 
 
 f Letter from the state of New York to congress, 5 February 1781. Papers of 
 Old Congress, Ixvii., 344. MS. A copy of the letter was sent to Washington by 
 Clinton, 14 February 1781. Letters to Washington, xlvi., 172. MS. 
 
 J Washington to Duane, 26 December 1780. 
 
1781. THE STRUGGLE FOK REVENUE. 25 
 
 " a permanent system for the several departments." * Hamil- 
 ton " was among the first who were convinced that their ad- 
 ministration by single men was essential to the proper manage- 
 ment of affairs." f On the tenth of January 1Y81, congress 
 initiated a reform by establishing a department of foreign 
 affairs ;:[ but more than eight months elapsed before it was 
 filled by Kobert K. Livingston. 
 
 There was the most pressing need of a minister of war. 
 After tedious rivalries and delays, Benjamin Lincoln was 
 elected ; but he did not enter upon the office till near the 
 end of JSTovember, when the attempt of Great Britain to sub- 
 jugate America had ceased. 
 
 For the treasury, John Sulhvan suggested to Washington 
 the name of Hamilton. * How far Hamilton had made a 
 study of finance, "Washington did not know; but he said: 
 " Few of his age have a more general knowledge, and no one 
 is more firmly engaged in the cause, or exceeds him in probity 
 and sterling virtue." 1 In February the choice fell on Eobert 
 Morris, and unanimously, except that Massachusetts abstained 
 from the ballot, ^ Samuel Adams preferring the old system of 
 committees.^ 
 
 While Morris delayed his acceptance, Hamilton, who had 
 been the first to present his name for the place, opened a cor- 
 respondence with him. " A national debt," he wrote, " if it is 
 not excessive, will be a national blessing, a powerful cement of 
 union, a necessity for keeping up taxation, and a spur to in- 
 dustry." J He recommended a national bank, with a capital 
 of ten or fifteen millions of dollars, to be paid two sixths in 
 specie, one sixth in bills or securities on good European funds, 
 and three sixths in good landed security. It was to be erected 
 into a legal corporation for thirty years, during which no 
 
 * Hough's edition of Convention at Boston, 3-9 August 1780, 51. 
 
 f Hamilton to Robert Morris, SO April 1781 ; Hamilton, i., 223 ; to Duane, 
 3 September 1780. Ibid., i., 154. 
 :j: Journals of Congress, iii., 564. 
 
 * Sullivan to Washington, 29 January 1781. MS. 
 
 II Washington to Sullivan, 4 February 1781. Sparks, vii., 399. 
 
 ^ Journals of Congress, iii., 580. 
 
 ^ Luzerne to Vergennes, 25 March 1731. Partly printed in Sparks, vii., 400. 
 
 ^ Hamilton, i., 257. 
 
26 THE CONFEDERATIOIN'. b. i. ; en. ii. 
 
 otlier bank, public or private, was to be permitted. Its capi- 
 tal and deposits were to be exempt from taxation, and the 
 United States, collectively and particularly, and conjointly 
 with the private proprietors, were to become responsible 
 for all its transactions. Its som-ces of profit were to be the 
 sole right of issuing a currency for the United States equal 
 in amount to the whole capital of the bank ; loans at a rate 
 not exceeding eight per cent ; discount of bills of exchange ; 
 contracts with the French government for the supply of its 
 fleets and armies in America, with the United States for the 
 supply of their army ; dealings in real estates, especially, with 
 its large capital, buying at favorable opportunities the real 
 estates of men w^ho, having rendered themselves odious, w^ould 
 be obliged to leave the country. Another source of immense 
 gain, contingently even of one hundred per cent, was to be a 
 contract with the United States for taking up all their paper 
 emissions. Incidentally, Hamilton expressed his " wish to see 
 a convention of all the states, with full power to alter and 
 amend, finally and irrevocably, the present futile and senseless 
 confederation." * 
 
 This communication led to the closest relations between 
 Hamilton and Robert Morris ; but, vehement as was the char- 
 acter of the older man, his schemes fell far short of the daring 
 suggestions of his young counsellor. On the fourteenth of 
 May, Morris was installed as the superintendent of finance, 
 and three days later he laid before congress his plan for a 
 national bank, f Its capital was to be four hundred thousand 
 doUars in gold and silver, with power of increase at discretion ; 
 its notes were to form the currency of the country, and be re- 
 ceivable as specie for duties and taxes by every state and by 
 the United States. Authority to constitute the company a 
 legal body not being granted by the articles of confederation, 
 Morris submitted that congress should apply to the states for 
 the power of incorporating a bank and prohibiting all other 
 banks. J 
 
 On the twenty-sixth, congress, without waiting to hear the 
 
 * Hamilton, i., 223-257. 
 
 f Journals of Congress, iii., 624 ; Diplomatic Correspondence, vii., 444-449. 
 
 X E. Morris to congress, 17 May 1781. Diplomatic Correspondence, xi., S64. 
 
1781. THE STRUGGLE FOR REVENUE. 27 
 
 voices of the states, resolved that the bank should be incorpo- 
 rated so soon as the subscription should be filled and officers 
 chosen. This vote was carried by I^ew Hampshire, New Jer- 
 sey, and the five southernmost states, Massachusetts being in 
 the negative, Pennsylvania divided, and Madison alone of the 
 four members from Virginia opposing it as not within the 
 powers of the confederation. 
 
 From the want of a valuation of private lands and build- 
 ings, congress had not even the right to apportion requisitions. 
 The five states which met at Hartford had suggested for the 
 United States an impost as a source of revenue. New Jersey 
 and North Carolina sufiered from the legislation of the neigh- 
 boring states, which were the natural channels of a part of 
 their foreign trade : on the third of February 1Y81, Wither- 
 spoon and Burke, their representatives in congress, reviving an 
 amendment to the articles of confederation proposed by New 
 Jersey in 1Y78,'^ moved to vest in the United States the power 
 of regulating commerce according to " the common interest," 
 and, under restrictions calculated to soothe state jealousies, 
 the exclusive right of laying duties upon imported articles. 
 This motion, which v/as a memorable step toward union, failed 
 of success ; f and on the same day congress contented itself 
 with asking of the states, as an " indispensable necessity," the 
 power to levy a duty of five per cent ad valorem on all im- 
 ports, with no permanent exemptions except of wool cards 
 and cotton cards, and wire for making them. This first scheme 
 of duties on foreign commerce sought to foster American in- 
 dustry by the free admission of materials necessary to the 
 manufacturer. 
 
 The letter of the fifth of February from the state of New 
 York was met on its way by the vote of congress of the third. 
 In March, New York granted the duties, to "be collected in 
 such manner and by such ofiicers as congress should direct." ^ 
 Connecticut had acted a month earlier at a special session 
 called by Governor Trumbull, but had limited its grant to the 
 end of the third year after the war.* New Hampshire fol- 
 
 * Journals of Congress, ii., 604. f Ibid., iii., 573. 
 X Papers of Old Congress, Ixxv. 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iii., 594, 600. Papers of Old Congress, Ixxv. MS. 
 
28 THE OON'FEDERATIO:Nr. b. i. ; oh. il 
 
 lowed in tlie first week of April.* Massachusetts delayed its 
 consent till tlie next year, and then reserved to itself the ap- 
 pointment of the collectors. 
 
 Outside of the ^ve states which met at Hartford, the first 
 to agree to the new demand were Pennsylvania and !New Jer- 
 sey, f The general assembly of Virginia, which was to have 
 met in Eichmond on the seventh of May, was chased by the 
 enemy to Charlottesville, where it elected Benjamin Harrison 
 its speaker, and where John Taylor of Caroline,J according to 
 order, presented a bill to enable the United States to levy the 
 needed duty. Fleeing beyond the mountains, they completed 
 the act at Staunton. The grant, of which Harrison had been 
 the great promoter,* was restricted neither as to time nor aa 
 to form. II Early in September, North Carolina adopted the 
 measure;^ Delaware in ISTovember; South Carolina in Feb- 
 ruary 1782 ; and Maryland in its following April session. The 
 consent of Georgia was confidently expected. 
 
 After the surrender of Cornwallis, the legislature of New 
 York once more declared the readiness of their state to com- 
 ply with any measures to render the union of the United States 
 more intimate, and to contribute their proportion of well-estab- 
 lished funds. ^ This alacrity Clinton, on the twenty-fourth of 
 November, reported to congress as the highest " evidence of a 
 sincere disposition in the state to promote the common inter- 
 est."J 
 
 Meantime the subscriptions to the bank languished, and 
 Morris thought fit to apply to John Jay for money from the 
 court of Madrid for its benefit, saying : " I am determined 
 that the bank shall be well supported until it can support itself, 
 and then it will support us.":^ But there was no ray of hope 
 
 * Papers of Old Congress, Ixxiv., 9. MS. 
 
 f Dallas's Laws of Pennsylvania, i., 890. The act was of 5 April 1781. 
 Journals of Congress, iii., 632. The act of New Jersey was passed 2 June 1781. 
 Wilson's Acts of New Jersey, 191. 
 
 :j: Journal of House of Delegates, 30 May 1781. 
 
 * Harrison to Washington 31 March 1783. 
 
 II Papers of Old Congress, Ixxv., 359. Hening's Statutes at Large, x., 409. 
 
 ^ Papers of Old Congress, Ixxvi., 91. Journals of Congress, iii., 674. 
 
 ^ Papers of Old Congress, Ixvii., 438. MS. 
 
 i Ibid., 443. ^ Morris to Jay, 13 July 1781. Dip. Cor., vii., 440. 
 
1782. THE STRUGGLE FOK REVENUE. 29 
 
 from that quarter. Tbougli so late as October 1781 the sub- 
 scription amounted to no more than seventy thousand dollars,* 
 he was yet able to prevail with congress, on the thirty-first 
 day of December, to incorporate the bank " forever " by the 
 name of the Bank of E"orth America ; but it was not to exer- 
 cise powers in any one of the United States repugnant to the 
 laws or constitution of that state. f But for this restriction 
 Madison would have seen in the ordinance " a precedent of 
 usurpation." J 
 
 The bank still wanted capital. During the autumn of 1781 
 a remittance in specie of nearly five hundred thousand dollars 
 had been received from the king of France, and brought to 
 Philadelphia. In January 1782, Morris, with no clear warrant, 
 subscribed all of this sum that remained in the treasury, being 
 about two hundred and fifty-four thousand dollars, to the stock 
 of the bank,* which was thus nursed into life by the public 
 moneys. In return, it did very little, and could do very little, 
 for the United States. Its legal establishment was supported 
 by a charter from the state of Massachusetts, in March 1782 ; 
 by an act of recognition from Pennsylvania in March, and a 
 charter on the first of April ; and ten days later by a charter 
 from !N"ew York. The final proviso of the 'New York charter 
 was, " that nothing in this act contained shall be construed to 
 imply any right or power in the United States in congress 
 assembled to create bodies politic, or grant letters of incorpo- 
 ration in any case whatsoever."! The acts of Pennsylvania 
 were repealed in 1785. Delaware gave a charter in 1786. 
 
 The confederacy promised itself a solid foundation for 
 a system of finance from a duty on imports. Through the 
 press, Hamilton now pleads for vesting congress with full 
 power of regulating trade ; and he contrasts the " prospect of 
 a number of petty states, jarring, jealous, and perverse, fluctu- 
 ating and unhappy at home, weak by their dissensions in the 
 eyes of other nations," with the " noble and magnificent per- 
 spective of a great federal republic." 
 
 * Life of Morris, 8L 
 
 f Ordinance to incorporate, etc. Journals of Congress, iii., 706, 101. 
 X Gilpin, 105. 
 
 * From the narrative of Robert Morris in Life of Morris, 90. 
 fi Jones & Varick's edition of Laws of New York, 1789, 11, 
 
30 THE CONFEDERATION". b. i. ; oh. ii. 
 
 It is the glory of JSTew York that its legislature was the 
 first to impart the sanction of a state to the great conception 
 of a federal convention to frame a constitution for the United 
 States. On the report of a committee of which Madison was 
 the head, congress, in May 1782, took into consideration the 
 desperate condition of the finances of the country, and divided 
 between four of its members the office of explaining the com- 
 mon danger to every state.* At the request of the delegation 
 which repaired to the ]N"orth, Clinton convened an extra ses- 
 sion of the senate and assembly of ]N'ew York at Poughkeepsie, 
 where, in July, they received from the committee of congress 
 a full communication f " on the necessity of providing for a 
 vigorous prosecution of the war." 
 
 The legislature had been in session for a week v/hen Ham- 
 ilton, who for a few months filled the office of United States 
 receiver of revenue for his state, repaired to Poughkeepsie 
 " to second the views " of his superior. In obedience to in- 
 structions, he strongly represented " the necessity of solid ar- 
 rangements of finance ; " but lie went to the work " without 
 very sanguine expectations," for he believed that, " whatever 
 momentary eifort the legislature might make, very little would 
 be done till the entire change of the present system ; " and, 
 before this could be effected, " mountains of prejudice and par- 
 ticular interest were to be levelled." J 
 
 On the nineteenth, three days after his arrival, on the mo- 
 tion of Schuyler, his father-in-law, who was ever constant in 
 support of a national system, the senate resolved itself into 
 " a committee of the whole on the state of the nation." From 
 its deliberations on two successive days a series of resolutions 
 proceeded, which, as all agree, Hamilton drafted, and which, 
 after they had been considered by paragraphs, were unanimously 
 adopted by the senate. The house concurred in them with- 
 out amendment and with equal unanimity. These resolutions 
 as they went forth from the legislature find in the public ex- 
 perience " the strongest reason to apprehend from a continu- 
 ance of the present constitution of the continental government 
 a subversion of public credit," and a danger " to the safety and 
 
 * Journals of Congress, 22 May and 15 and 18 July 1782. 
 
 f Clinton's message of 11 July 1782. J Hamilton, i., 280, 288,. 
 
1782. THE STRUGGLE FOR REVENUE. 31 
 
 independence of the states." They repeat the words of the 
 Hartford convention and of Clinton, that the radical source of 
 the public embarrassments had been the want of sufficient 
 power in congress, particularly the power of providing for 
 itself a revenue, which could not be obtained by partial delib- 
 erations of the separate states. For these reasons the legis- 
 lature of ]N"ew York invite congress for the common welfare 
 " to recommend and each state to adopt the measure of as- 
 sembling a general convention of the states specially authorized 
 to revise and amend the confederation, reserving a right to the 
 respective legislatures to ratify their determinations." * These 
 resolutions the governor of New York was requested to trans- 
 mit to congress and to the executive of every state. 
 
 The legislature held a conference with Hamilton, as the 
 receiver of revenue, but without permanent results ; and it in- 
 cluded him " pretty unanimously " in its appointment of dele- 
 gates to congress for the ensuing year. On the fourth of 
 August the resolutions for a federal convention were commu- 
 nicated by Clinton without a word of remark to the congress 
 then in session. There, on the fifteenth, they were referred 
 to a grand committee ; but there is no evidence that that con- 
 gress proceeded to its election. 
 
 In his distress for money, Morris solicited a new French 
 loan of twenty millions of livres. The demand was excessive : 
 the king, however, consented to a loan of six millions for the 
 year 1783, of which Franklin immediately received one tenth 
 part. " You will take care," so Yergennes wrote to Luzerne, 
 *' not to leave them any hope that the king can make them 
 further advances or guarantee for them new loans from others ; " 
 and he complained that the United States did not give suffi- 
 cient proofs of their readiness to create the means for meeting 
 their debts.f 
 
 On the twenty-fourth of December the French auxiliary 
 forces in the United States, except one regiment which soon 
 followed, embarked at Boston for the West Indies. The affec- 
 tions, the gratitude, the sympathy, the hopes of America fol- 
 lowed the French officers as they left her shores. What 
 
 * ITS. copy of the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of New York for the 
 cession of July 1782. f Vergennes to Luzerne, 21 December 1782. 
 
32 THE CONFEDERATION". b. i. ; ch. ii. 
 
 boundless services they liad rendered in tlie establisliment of 
 her independence ! What creative ideas they were to carry 
 home ! How did they in later wars defy death in all climes, 
 from San Domingo to Moscow and to the Nile, always ready 
 to bleed for their beautiful land, often yielding up their lives 
 for liberty ! Rochambeau, who was received with special honor 
 by Louis XYI., through a happy accident escaped the perils of 
 the revolution, and lived to be more than fourscore years of 
 age. Yiomenil, his second in command, was mortally wounded 
 while defending his king in the palace of the Tuileries. De 
 Grasse died before a new war broke out. For more than fifty 
 years Lafayette — in the states general, in convention, in legis- 
 lative assemblies, at the head of armies, in exile, in cruel and 
 illegal imprisonment, in retirement, in his renewed public life, 
 the emancipator of slaves, the apostle of free labor, the dearest 
 guest of America — remained to his latest hour the true and 
 the ever hopeful representative of loyalty to the cause of Hb- 
 erty. The Yiscount de Noailles, who so gladly assisted to 
 build in America the home of human freedom for comers from 
 all nations, was destined to make the motion which in one 
 night swept from his own country feudal privilege and per- 
 sonal servitude. The young Count Henri de Saint-Simon, who 
 during his four campaigns in America mused on the never- 
 ending succession of sorrows for the many, devoted himself to 
 the reform of society, government, and industry. Dumas sur- 
 vived long enough to take part in the revolution of July 
 1830. Charles Lameth, in the states general and constituent 
 assembly, proved one of the wisest and ablest of the popular 
 party, truly loving liberty and hating all excesses in its name. 
 Alexander Lameth, acting with the third estate in the states 
 general, proposed the abolition of all privileges, the enfran- 
 chisement of every slave, and freedom of the press ; he shared 
 the captivity of Lafayette in Olmiitz, and to the end of his 
 life was a defender of constitutional rights. Custine of Metz, 
 whose brilliant services in the United States had won for him 
 very high promotion, represented in the states general the no- 
 bility of Lorraine, and insisted on a declaration of the rights 
 of man. Of the Marquis de Chastellux Washington said: 
 " JSTever have I parted with a man to whom my soul clave more 
 
1782. THE STRUGGLE FOR REVENUE. 33 
 
 sincerely." * His pliilaiitliropic zeal for " tlie greatest good 
 of the greatest number" was interrupted only by an early 
 death. 
 
 Let it not be forgotten that Secondat, a grandson of the 
 great Montesquieu, obtained promotion for good service in 
 America. ISTor may an Amercan fail to name the young Prince 
 de Broglie, though he arrived too late to take part in any bat- 
 tle. In the midday of life, just before he was wantonly sent 
 to the guillotine, he said to his child, then nine years old, 
 afterward the self-sacrificing minister, who kept faith with the 
 United States at the cost of popularity and place : " My son, 
 they may strive to draw you away from the side of liberty, by 
 saying to you that it took the life of your father ; never be- 
 lieve them, and remain true to its noble cause." 
 
 At the time when the strength which came from the pres- 
 ence of a wealthy and generous ally was departing, the ground 
 was shaking beneath the feet of congress. Pennsylvania, the 
 great central state, in two memorials offered to congress the 
 dilemma, either to satisfy its creditors in that state, or to suffer 
 them to be paid by the state itself out of its contributions to 
 the general revenue. The first was impossible; the second 
 would dissolve the union. Yet it was with extreme difficulty 
 that Putledge, Madison, and Hamilton, a committee from con- 
 gress, prevailed upon the assembly of Pennsylvania to desist 
 for the time from appropriating funds raised for the confed- 
 eration, f 
 
 The system for revenue by duties on importations seemed 
 now to await only the assent of Rhode Island. That common- 
 wealth in 1781 gave a wavering answer ; and then instructed 
 its delegates in congress to uphold state sovereignty and in- 
 dependence. On the first of ITovember 1782 its assembly 
 unanimously rejected the measure for three reasons : the im- 
 post would bear hardest on the most commercial states, par- 
 ticularly upon Ehode Island ; officers unknown to the constitu- 
 tion would be introduced ; a revenue for the expenditure of 
 which congress is not to be accountable to the states would 
 
 * Sparks, viii., 367. 
 
 f Gilpin, 199, 216, 224, 488 ; Journals of Congress, 4 December 1782 ; Min- 
 utes of Assembly of Pennsylvania for 1782, pp. 663, 675, 733. 
 
 VOL. VI. — 3 
 
84 THE OONFEDERATIOX. b. i. ; ch. ii. 
 
 render that body independent of its constituents, and would be 
 repugnant to the liberty of the United States. * 
 
 The necessity of the consent of every one of the thirteen 
 states to any amendment of the confederacy gave to Rhode 
 Island a control over the destinies of America. Against 
 its obstinacy the confederation was helpless. The reply to 
 its communication, drafted by Hamilton, declared, first : that 
 the duty would prove a charge not on the importing state, 
 but on the consumer; next, that no governm_ent can exist 
 without a right of appointing officers for those purposes 
 which proceed from and centre in itself, though the power 
 may not be expressly known to the constitution; lastly, the 
 impost is a measure of necessity, " and, if not within the 
 letter, is within the spirit of the confederation." f 
 
 The growing discontent of the army, the clamor of public 
 creditors, the enormous deficit in the revenue, were invincible 
 arguments for a plan which promised relief. Congress hav- 
 ing no resource except persuasion, three of its members would 
 have borne its letter to Rhode Island but for intelligence from 
 Yirginia.J 
 
 In the legislature of that state, Richard Henry Lee, wait- 
 ing till the business of the session was nearly over and the 
 house very thin, * proposed to the assembly to withdraw its 
 assent to the federal impost ; and the repeal was carried in the 
 house on the sixth, in the senate on the seventh of December, | 
 without a negative. The reasons for the act, as recited in its 
 preamble, were : " The permitting any power other than the 
 general assembly of this commonwealth to levy duties or taxes 
 upon the citizens of this state within the same is injurious to 
 its sovereignty, may prove destructive of the rights and liberty 
 of the people, and, so far as congress may exercise the same, 
 is contravening the spirit of the confederation." ^ 
 
 Far-sighted members of congress prognosticated the most 
 pernicious effects on the character, interests, and duration of 
 
 * Records of Rhode Island, ix., 487, 612, 682, 683, 684. 
 
 f Journals of Congress, iv., 200. X Gilpin, 488, 238 ; Elliot, 17. 
 
 * Governor B. Harrison to Washington, 31 March 17S3. 
 
 I Papers of Old Congress, vol. Ixv. Journals of House of Delegates, 55-58. 
 ^ Hening, xi., 171. 
 
1782. THE STRUGGLE FOR REVENUE. 35 
 
 tlie confederacy. The broad line of party division was clearly 
 dra^vn. The contest was between the existing league of states 
 and a republic of united states ; between " state sovereignty " * 
 and a "consolidated union ;"f between "state poUtics and 
 continental politics ; " if between the fear of " the centripetal " 
 and the fear of " the centrifugal force " in the system.* Yir- 
 ginia made itself the battle-ground on which for the next six 
 years the warring opinions were to meet. During all that time , 
 Washington and Madison led the striving for a more perfect \ 
 union ; Richard Henry Lee, at present sustained by the legis- 
 lature of Yirginia, was the persistent champion of separatism 
 and the sovereignty of each state. 
 
 How beneiicent was the authority of the union appeared at 
 this time from a shining example. To quell the wild strife 
 which had grown out of the claim of Connecticut to lands 
 within the charter boundary of Pennsylvania, five commission- 
 ers appointed by congress opened their court at Trenton. " The 
 case was well argued by learned counsel on both sides," and, 
 after a session of more than six weeks, the court pronounced || 
 their unanimous opinion, that the jurisdiction and pre-emp- 
 tion of the lands in controversy did of right belong to the 
 state of Pennsylvania. The judgment was approved by con- 
 gress ; and the parties in the litigation gave the example of 
 submission to this first settlement of a controversy between 
 states by the decree of a court estabhshed by the United States. 
 
 * William Gordon to A. Lee. Lee's Life of Arthur Lee, ii., 291. 
 
 I Lafayette ia Diplomatic Correspondence, x., 41. 
 X Hamilton, i., S56. 
 
 * Speech of Wilson, 23 January 1783, in Gilpin, 290; Elliot, 34. The same 
 figure was used by Hamilton to Washington, 24 March 1783. Hamilton, i., 348. 
 
 II Journals of Congress, 30 December 1782. 
 
36 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. hi. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 AMEEICA AND GEEAT BEITAIN. 
 
 1782-1783. 
 
 The king of France heard from Yergennes, with surprise 
 and resentment, that the American deputies had signed their 
 treaty of peace ; * Marie Antoinette was conciliated by the 
 assurance that " they had obtained for their constituents the 
 most advantageous conditions." " The English buy the peace 
 rather than make it," wrote Yergennes to his subaltern in Lon- 
 don ; their " concessions as to boundaries, the fisheries, and the 
 loyalists, exceed everything that I had thought possible." f 
 " The treaty with America," answered Rayneval, " appears to 
 me like a dream." :]: Kaunitz * and his emperor || mocked at 
 its articles. 
 
 King George of England was mastered by a consuming 
 grief for the loss of America, and knew no ease of mind by 
 day or by night. When, on the fifth of December, in his 
 speech at the opening of parliament, he came to read that he 
 had offered to declare the colonies of America free and inde- 
 pendent states, his manner was constrained "'^ and his voice 
 fell. To wound him least, Shelbume in the house of lords, 
 confining himself to the language of the speech from the throne, 
 
 * Count Mercy's report from Paris, 6 December 1Y82. MS. from Vienna 
 archives. f Yergennes to Rayneval, 4 December 1782. MS. 
 
 X Rayneval to Yergennes, 12 December 1782. MS. 
 
 * Kaunitz's note of 22 December 1782, written on the emperor's copy of the 
 speech of the king of England at the opening of parliament. MS. 
 
 I Autograph memorandum of Joseph. MS. Joseph II. und Leopold von 
 Toscana. Ihr Brief wechsel von 1781 bis 1790, i., 146. 
 ^ Rayneval to Yergennes, 12 December 1782. MS. 
 
1782-1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN. 37 
 
 represented the offer of independence to America as contingent 
 on peace with France. To a question from Fox on the follow- 
 ing night in the other house, Pitt, with unfaltering courage, an- 
 swered that the recognition was unqualified and irrevocable. 
 
 During the Christmas holidays the negotiations for a gen- 
 eral peace were pursued with equal diligence and moderation 
 by Yergennes and Shelburne ; and France made sacrifices of 
 its own to induce Spain to forego the recovery of Gibraltar 
 and assent to terms which in all other respects were most gen- 
 erous. The Netherlands, though their definitive peace was 
 delayed, agreed in the suspension of arms. Franklin shrewdly 
 and truly observed that it would be better for the nations then 
 possessing the West India islands to let them govern them- 
 selves as neutral powers, open to the commerce of all, the prof- 
 its of the present monopoHes being by no means equivalent 
 to the expense of maintaining them ; * but the old system was 
 preserved. Conquests were restored, and England felt it to 
 be no wound to her dignity to give back an unimportant island 
 which she had wrested from the house of Bourbon in a for- 
 mer war. The East Indian alUes of France, of whom the fore- 
 most was Tippoo Saib, the son and successor of Hyder Ali, 
 were invited to join in the peace. France recovered St. Pierre 
 and Miquelon and her old share in the fisheries of Newfound- 
 land ; Spain retained Minorca, and, what was of the greatest 
 moment for the United States, both the Floridas, which she 
 certainly would find a burden. Treaties of commerce between 
 Great Britain and each of the two Bourbon kingdoms were to 
 be made within two years. 
 
 When, on the twentieth of January, these preliminaries 
 were signed by the respective plenipotentiaries, John Adams 
 and Benjamin Franklin, on the summons of Yergennes, were 
 present, and in the name of the United States acceded to the 
 declaration of the cessation of hostilities. The provisional 
 treaty between Great Britain and the United States was held 
 to take effect from that day. 
 
 " At last," wrote Yergennes to Eayneval, as soon as the 
 meeting was over, " we are about to breathe under the shadow 
 of peace. Let us take care to make it a solid one ; may the 
 
 * Diplomatic Correspondence, iv., 69. 
 
38 THE CONFEDERATION". b.i.;oh. m. 
 
 name of war be forgotten forever." ^'* In a letter to Shelburne 
 on that same day he expressed the confident hope that all 
 ancient distrust would be removed ; and Shelbnrne replied : 
 " The liberal spirit and good faith which have governed our 
 neo;otiations leave no room to fear for the future either di&- 
 trust or jealousy." f King George dwelt with Eayneval on 
 the cordial understanding which he desired to establish with 
 Louis XYI. " I wish," said he, " never again to have a war 
 with France ; we have had a first division of Poland ; there 
 must not be a second." J 
 
 So came the peace which recognised the right of a com- 
 monwealth of Europeans outside of Europe, occupying a con- 
 tinental territory within the temperate zone ; remote from 
 foreign interference ; needing no standing armies ; with every 
 augury of a rapid growth ; and sure of exercising the most 
 quickening and widest influence on political ideas, ^' to assume 
 an equal station among the powers of the earth." 
 
 The restoration of intercourse with America pressed for 
 instant consideration. Burke was of opinion that the naviga- 
 tion act should be completely revised ; Shelburne and his col- 
 leagues, aware that no paltry regulation would now succeed, 
 were indefatigable in digesting a great and extensive system 
 of trade, and sought, by the emancipation of commerce, to 
 bring about with the Americans a family friendship more 
 beneficial to England than their former dependence.* To 
 promote this end, on the evening of the eleventh of February, 
 William Pitt, with the permission of the king, repaired to 
 Charles James Fox and invited him to join the ministry of 
 Shelburne. The only good course for Fox was to take the 
 hand which the young statesman offered; but he put aside 
 the overture vdth coldness, if not with disdain, choosing a 
 desperate alliance with those whose conduct he had pretended 
 to detest, and whose principles it was in later years his redeem- 
 ing glory to have opposed. 
 
 * Vcrgennes to Rayneval, 20 January 1783. MS. 
 
 f Vergennes to Shelburne, 20 January 1783 ; Shelburne to Yergcnnes, 24 
 January 1*783. Lansdowne House MSS. 
 
 X Rayneval to Vergennes, 24 and 28 January 1*783. MS. 
 
 * Price in Lee's Life of Arthur Lee, ii., 349. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN". 39 
 
 Pending the negotiations with France and Spain, Fox and 
 Lord North remained quiet, from the desire to throw the 
 undivided responsibility for the peace on Lord Shelbume; 
 but when on the seventeenth of February, in a house of four 
 hundred and fifty members, the treaties with the United States 
 and with both branches of the Bourbons were laid before par- 
 liament, and an address of approval, promising a liberal revi- 
 sion of commercial law, was moved, the long-pent-up passions 
 raged without restraint. 'No sooner had William "Wilberforce, 
 with grace and good feeling, seconded the motion and in the 
 warmest language assured to the loyal refugees compensation 
 for their losses, than Lord John Cavendish, the nearest friend 
 of Fox, condemned the peace, though supporting its condi- 
 tions. Lord North then pronounced against it a most elabo- 
 rate, uncandid, and factious invective. He would have de- 
 prived the United States of access to the upper lakes ; he 
 would have retained for Canada the country north and north- 
 west of the Ohio ; and, bad as is a possession which gives no 
 advantage but powers of annoyance, he would have kept east 
 Florida as well as the Bahamas, so as to compel the ships of 
 America, in passing through the Florida channel, to run the 
 gauntlet between British posts. lie would have had no peace 
 without the reinstatement of the loyalists, nor without securing 
 independence to the savage allies of Great Britain. He enu- 
 merated one by one the posts in the West which by the treaty 
 fell to America, dwelt on the cost of their construction and 
 on their importance to the fur-trade, and foreshadowed the 
 policy of delaying their surrender. He not only censured the 
 grant to the Americans of a right to fish on the coast of Nova 
 Scotia, but spoke as if they derived from Great Britain the 
 right to fish on the banks in the sea which are the exclusive 
 property of no one. At the side of Lord North stood Edmund 
 Burke, with hotter zeal as a partisan, though with better inten- 
 tions toward America. Pitt answered every objection to the 
 treaty ; but, after a debate of twelve hours, the ministry on 
 the division found themselves in a minority of sixteen. 
 
 On the same evening, to a larger number of peers than had 
 met in their house since the accession of George HI., Carlisle, 
 the unsuccessful commissioner of 1778, KejDpel, the inglorious 
 
iO THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. hi. 
 
 admiral, and Stormont, the late headstrong ambassador at 
 Paris, eager to become once more a secretary of state. Lord 
 George Germain, now known as Lord Sackville, Wedderburn, 
 now Lord Loughborough and coveting the office of lord chan- 
 cellor, poured forth criminations of a treaty for which the 
 necessity was due to their own incapacity. In perfect under- 
 standing with Fox and Lord North, they complained that the 
 ministers had given up the banks of the Ohio, " the paradise 
 of America," had surrendered the fur-trade, had broken faith 
 with the Indians, had been false to the loyalists. Thurlow 
 ably defended every article of the treaty that had been im- 
 peached, and then asked : " Is there any individual in this 
 house who dares to avow that his wish is for war ? " The in- 
 terest of the debate centred in Shelburne, and the house gave 
 him the closest attention as he spoke : " Noble lords who made 
 a lavish use of these Indians have taken great pains to show 
 their immense value, but those who abhorred their violence 
 will think the ministry have done wisely." Naming a British 
 agent who had been detested for wanton cruelty, he continned : 
 " The descendants of William Penn will manage them better 
 than all the Stuarts, with aU the trumpery and jobs that we 
 could contrive. 
 
 "With regard to the loyalists, I have but one answer to 
 give the house. It is the answer I gave my own bleeding 
 heart. A part must be wounded that the whole empire may 
 not perish. If better terms could have been had, think you, 
 my lords, that I would not have embraced them ? If it had 
 been possible to put aside the bitter cup which the adversi- 
 ties of this country presented to me, you know I would have 
 done it. 
 
 " The fur-trade is not given up ; it is only divided, and 
 divided for our benefit. Its best resources lie to the north- 
 ward. Monopolies, some way or other, are ever justly pun- 
 ished. They forbid rivalry, and rivalry is the very essence of 
 the well-being of trade. This seems to be the era of protest- 
 antism in trade. All Europe appears enlightened and eager to 
 throw off the vile shackles of oppressive, ignorant, unmanly 
 monopoly. It is always unwise ; but, if there is any nation 
 under heaven who ought to be the first to reject monopoly, it 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN. 41 
 
 is the English. Situated as we are between the Old World and 
 the 'New, and between southern and northern Europe, all that 
 we onght to covet is equality and free-trade. With more in- 
 dustry, with more enterprise, with more capital than any 
 trading nation upon earth, it ought to be our constant cry, 
 Let every market be open ; let us meet our rivals fairly and 
 ask no more, telling the Americans that we desire to live with 
 them in communion of benefits and in sincerity of friend- 
 ship." ^ 
 
 At near half-past four in the morning the majority of the 
 lords for the ministry was only thirteen. 
 
 On the twenty-first, resolutions censuring them were offered 
 in the house of commons. In the former debate. Fox had 
 excused the change in his relations to Lord North by the plea 
 that his friendships were perpetual, his enmities placable ; 
 keeping out of sight that political principles may not be sacri- 
 ficed to personal reconciliations, he now proclaimed and justi- 
 fied their coalition. "Their coalition," replied Pitt, "origi- 
 nated rather in an inclination to force the earl of Shelbume 
 from the treasury than in any real conviction that ministers 
 deserve censure for the concessions they have made, f What- 
 ever appears dishonorable or inadequate in the peace on your 
 table is strictly chargeable to the noble lord in the blue rib- 
 bon," Lord North, " whose profusion of the pubhc money, 
 whose notorious temerity and obstinacy in prosecuting the 
 war which originated in his pernicious and oppressive policy, 
 and whose utter incapacity to fill the station he occupied, ren- 
 dered peace of any description indispensable to the preserva- 
 tion of the state. The triumph of party shall never induce me 
 to call the abandonment of former princij^les a forgetting of 
 ancient prejudices, or to pass an amnesty upon measures which 
 have brought my country almost to the verge of ruin. I will 
 never engage in political enmities without a public cause ; I 
 will never forego such enmities without the public approba- 
 tion. High situation and great infiuence I am solicitous to 
 possess, whenever they can be acquired with dignity. I relin- 
 quish them the moment any duty to my country, my character, 
 or my friends, renders such a sacrifice indispensable. I look 
 
 * Almon's Parliamentary Kegister, sxTiii., 67, 68. f Ibid., xxvi., 347. 
 
42 THE CONTEDER ATIOIf. b. i. ; oh. iii. 
 
 to the independent part of the house and to the public at large 
 for that acquittal from blame to which mj innocence entitles 
 me. Mj earliest impressions were in favor of the noblest and 
 most disinterested modes of serving the public. These im- 
 pressions I will cherish as a legacy infinitely more valuable 
 than the greatest inheritance. You may take from me the 
 privileges and emoluments of place, but you cannot, you shall 
 not, take from me those habitual regards for the prosperity of 
 Great Britain which constitute the honor, the happiness, the 
 pride of my life. With this consolation, the loss of power 
 and the loss of fortune, though I affect not to despise, I hope 
 I shall soon be able to forget. I praise Fortune when con- 
 stant ; if she stnkes her swift wing, I resign her gifts and seek 
 upright, unportioned poverty." ^ 
 
 The eloquence of Pitt, his wise conduct, and the purity of his 
 morals, gained him the confidence to which Fox vainly aspired.f 
 
 A majority of seventeen aj)pearing against Shelburne, he 
 resigned on the twenty-fourth ; and by his advice the king on 
 the same day offered to Pitt, though not yet twenty-four years 
 old, the treasury, with power to form an administration and 
 with every assurance of support. But the young statesman, 
 obeying alike the dictates of prudence and the custom of the 
 British constitution, would not accept office without a majority 
 in the house of commons ; and on the twenty-seventh, finding 
 that such a majority could not be obtained but by the aid, or 
 at least the neatrality, of Lord I*Torth, he refused the splendid 
 offer, unalterably firm alike against the entreaties and the re- 
 proaches of the king. This moderation in a young man, pant- 
 ing with ambition and conscious of his powers, added new 
 I lustre to his fame. 
 
 While the imperfect agreement between the members of 
 the coalition delayed the formation of a ministry, on the third 
 of March, Pitt, as chancellor of the exchequer, presented a bill 
 framed after the liberal principles of Shelburne. J Its pream- 
 ble, which rightly described the Americans as aliens, declared 
 
 * Almon, xxvi., 341, 352 ; Life of Romilly, i., 205. 
 f Moustier to Vcrgennes, 1 Marcli 1783. MS. 
 
 :{: Fox in Moustier to Vergennes, 11 April 1783, MS. ; Price in Life of A. Lee, 
 ii., 349. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN 43 
 
 " it liiglilj expedient tliat tlie intercourse between Great 
 Britain and tlie United States slionld be established on tlie 
 most enlarged principles of reciprocal benefit ;" and, as a con- 
 sequence, not only were the ports of Great Britain to be opened 
 to them on the same terms as to other sovereign states, but, 
 alone of the foreign world, their ships and vessels, laden with 
 the produce or manufactures of their own country, might as of 
 old enter all British ports in America, paying no other duties 
 than those imposed on British vessels. 
 
 On the seventh Eden objected, saying : " The bill will in- 
 troduce a total revolution in our commercial system. Reci- 
 23rocity with the United States is nearly impracticable, from 
 their provincial constitutions. The plan is utterly improper, 
 for it completely repeals the navigation act. The American 
 states lie so contiguous to our West Indian islands, they will 
 supply them with provisions to the niin of the provision trade 
 with Ireland. We shall lose the carrying trade, for the Ameri- 
 cans are to be permitted under this bill to bring AYest Indian 
 commodities to Europe. The Americans on their return from 
 our ports may export our manufacturing tools, and, our artifi- 
 cers emigrating at the same time, we shall see our manufac- 
 tures transplanted to America. Nothing more should be done 
 than to repeal the prohibitory acts and vest the king in coun- 
 cil with powers for six months to suspend such laws as stand 
 in the way of an amicable intercourse." 
 
 Pitt agreed that " the bill was most complicated in its na- 
 ture and most extensive in its consequences," * and, giving it 
 but faint support, he solicited the assistance and the informa- 
 tion of every one present to mould it, so that it might prove 
 most useful at home and most acceptable in America. " While 
 there is an immense extent of unoccupied territory to attract 
 the inhabitants to agriculture," said Edmund Burke, " they 
 wiU not be able to rival us in manufactures. Do not treat 
 them as aliens. Let all prohibitory acts be repealed, and leave 
 the Americans in every respect as they were before in point of 
 trade." The clause authorizing direct intercourse between the 
 United States and the British West India islands was allowed 
 to remain in the report to the house.f 
 
 * Almon, xxvi., 439. f Almon, xxvi., 503. 
 
44: THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. m. 
 
 Before the bill was discussed again, the coalition, after 
 long delays caused bj almost fatal dissensions among them- 
 selves, had been installed. In pursuit of an ascendency in the 
 cabinet, Lord North plumed himself on having ever been a 
 consistent whig ; believing that " the appearance of power was 
 all that a king of England could have ; " * and insisting that 
 during all his ministry " he had never attributed to the crown 
 any other prerogative than it was acknowledged to possess by 
 every sound whig and by all those authors who had written on 
 the side of liberty." f But he betrayed his friends by con- 
 tenting himself with a subordinate office in a cabinet in 
 which there would always be a majority against him, and, 
 while Fox seized on the lead, the nominal chieftainship was 
 left to the duke of Portland, who had neither capacity for 
 business, nor activity, nor power as a speaker, nor knowledge 
 of liberal principles. 
 
 The necessity of accepting a ministry so composed drove 
 the king to the verge of madness. He sorrowed over " the 
 most profligate age ; " " the most unnatural coalition ; " J and 
 he was heard to use " strong expressions of personal abhorrence 
 of Lord l^orth, whom he charged with treachery and ingrati- 
 tude of the blackest nature." * " Wait till you see the end," i| 
 said the king to the representative of France at the next 
 levee ; and Fox knew that the chances in the game were 
 against him, as he called to mind that he had sought in vain 
 the support of Pitt ; had defied the king ; and had joined him- 
 self to colleagues whom he had taught liberal Englishmen to 
 despise, and whom he himself could not trust. 
 
 In the slowly advancing changes of the British constitution, 
 the old whig party, as first conceived by Shaftesbury and 
 Locke to resist the democratic revolution in England on the 
 one side, and the claim of arbitrary sovereignty by the Stuarts 
 on the other, was near its end. The time was coming for the 
 people to share in power. For the rest of his life. Fox battled 
 for the reform of the house of commons, so that it became the 
 rallying cry of the liberal party in England. A ministry di- 
 
 * Russell's Memorials of Charles James Fox, ii., 38. f Almon, xxvi., 355. 
 X The king to Shelburne, 22 February 1'783. MS. * Memorials of Fox, ii., 249. 
 I Moustier to Vergennes, 3 April 1783. MS. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN". 45 
 
 vided witMn itself bj irreconcilable opinions, detested by the 
 king, confronted by a strong and watchful and cautious oj^po- 
 sition, was forced to follow tbe line of precedents. The settle- 
 ment of the commercial relations to be established with the 
 United States had belonged to the treasury ; it was at once 
 brought by Fox within his department, although, from his 
 ignorance of political economy, he could have neither firm 
 convictions nor a consistent policy. He was not, indeed, with- 
 out glimpses of the benefit of liberty in trade. To him it was 
 a problem how far the act of navigation had ever been useful, 
 and what ought to be its fate ; * but the bill in which the late 
 ministry had begun to apply the principle of free commerce 
 with America he utterly condemned, "not," as he said, "from 
 animosity toward Shelburne, but because great injury often 
 came from reducing commercial theories to practice." More 
 over, the house of commons would insist on much deliberation 
 and very much inquiry before it would sacrifice the navigation 
 act to the circumstances of the present crisis.f 
 
 In judging his conduct, it must be considered that the 
 changes in the opinion of a people come from the slow evolu- 
 tion of thought in the public mind. One of the poets of Eng- 
 land, in the flush of youth, had prophesied : 
 
 " The time shall come when, free as seas or wind, 
 Unbounded Thames shall flow for all mankind. 
 Whole nations enter with each swelling tide. 
 And seas but join the regions they divide." 
 More than half a century must pass away before the prophecy 
 will come true by the efforts of statesmen, who, had Fox Kved 
 in their time, might have shared their indecision. 
 
 The coalition cabinet at its first meeting agreed to yield no 
 part of the navigation act, :[: and, as a matter of policy, to put 
 off the bill before parliament relating to commerce with Amer- 
 ica " till some progress should be made in a negotiation with 
 the American commissioners at Paris." Thither without delay 
 Fox sent, as minister on the part of Great Britain, David Hart- 
 ley, a friend of Franklin and a well-wisher to the United States. 
 
 * Moustier to Vergennes, 11 April 1 18S. MS. 
 
 f Fox to Hartley, 10 June 1Y83. MS. 
 
 X Fox to the king, Memorials of Fox, ii., 122. 
 
4:6 THE CONFEDERATION^. b. i. ; oh. m. 
 
 The avowed liberal opinions of Hartley raising distrust, 
 Lord Sheffield, a supporter of the ministry, and, on trade with 
 America, the master authority of that day for parliament, im- 
 mediately sounded an alarm. " Let the ministers know," said 
 he on the fifteenth, in the house of lords, " the country is as 
 tenacious of the principle of the navigation act as of the prin- 
 ciple of ]\Iagna Charta. They must not allow America to take 
 British colonial produce to ports in Europe. They must re- 
 serve to our remaining dominions the exclusive trade to the 
 "Wcot India islands ; otherwise, the only use of them will be 
 lost. If we permit any state to trade with our islands or to 
 carry into this country any produce but its own, we desert the 
 navigation act and sacrifice the marine of England. The peace 
 is in comparison a trifling object." * But there was no need 
 of fear lest Fox should yield too much. In his instructions to 
 Hartley, he was for taking the lion's share, as Yergennes truly 
 said.f He proposed that the manufactures of the thirteen 
 states should as a matter of course be excluded from Great 
 Britain, but that British manufactures should be admitted 
 everywhere in the United States. While America was de- 
 pendent, parliament had taxed importations of its produce, 
 but British ships and manufactures entered the colonies free of 
 duty. " The true object of the treaty in this business," so Fox 
 enforced his plan, " is the mutual admission of ships and mer- 
 chandise free from any new duty or imposition ; " :j; that is, 
 the Americans on their side should leave the British navigation 
 act in full force and renounce all right to establish an act of 
 navigation of their own ; should continue to pay duties in the 
 British ports on their own produce ; and receive in their own 
 ports British produce and manufactures duty free. One sub- 
 ject appealed successfully to the generous side of his nature. 
 To the earnest wish of Jay that British ships should have no 
 right under the convention to carry into the states any slaves 
 from any part of the world, it being the intention of the 
 United States entirely to prohibit their importation,* Fox 
 answered promptly : " If that be their policy, it never can be 
 
 * Almon, xxvi., 615. f Works of John Adams, Hi., 380. 
 
 X Fox to Hartley, 10 April 1783. MS. ^ 
 
 ^ June IT S3. Diplomatic Correspondence, x,, 154. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN. 47 
 
 competent to us to dis^Dute with them their own regulations." * 
 In like spirit, to formal complaints that Carleton, " in the face 
 of the treaty, persisted in sending off negroes by hundreds," 
 Fox made answer : " To have restored negroes whom we in- 
 vited, seduced if you will, under a promise of liberty, to the 
 tyranny and possibly to the vengeance of their former masters, 
 would have been such an act as scarce any orders from his 
 employers (and no such orders exist) could have induced a 
 man of honor to execute." f 
 
 The dignity and interests of the republic were safe, for 
 they were conlided to Adams, Franklin, and Jay. In America 
 there existed as yet no system of restrictions ; and congress 
 had not power to protect shipping or establish a custom-house. 
 The states as dependencies had been so severely and so wan- 
 tonly cramped by British navigation acts, and for more than a 
 century had so steadily resisted them, that the desire of abso- 
 lute freedom of commerce had become a part of their nature. 
 The American commissioners were very much pleased with 
 the trade-bill of Pitt, and with the principles expressed in its 
 preamble ; the debates upon it in parHament awakened their 
 distrust. They were ready for an}^ event, having but the one 
 simple and invariable policy of reciprocity. Their choice and 
 their offer was mutual unconditional free trade ; but, however 
 narrow might be the Kmits which England should impose, they 
 were resolved to insist on like for like. :[: The British commis- 
 sioner was himself in favor of the largest liberty for commerce, 
 but he was reproved by Fox for transmitting a proposition not 
 authorized by his instructions. ^/^J- * 
 
 A debate in the house of lords on the sixth of May revealed ( Jr^ 
 the rapidity with which the conviction was spreading that J <p,-v-^ 
 America had no power to adopt measures of defensive legisla- rTj^^^ ^ 
 tion. There were many who considered the United States as ^p>./v^ 
 having no government at all, and there were some who looked u^^ 
 for the early dissolution of the governments even of the sepa- v A> 
 rate states. Lord Walsingham, accordingly, proposed that the 
 law for admitting American ships should apply not merely to 
 the ships of the United States, but to ships belonging to any 
 
 * Fox to Hartley, 10 June 1783. MS. f Fox to Hartley, 9 August 1T83. 
 
 X Hartley to Fox, 20 May 1783. MS. 
 
48 THE CONFEDERATION". b. i. ; oh. m. 
 
 one of the states and to any ship or vessel belonging to any of 
 the inhabitants thereof. He was supported by Thurlow, who 
 said : " I have read an account which stated the government of 
 America to be totally unsettled, and that each province seemed 
 intent on establishing a distinct, independent, sovereign state. 
 If this is really the case, the amendment will be highly neces- 
 sary and proper." * The amendment was dropped ; and the 
 bill under discussion, in its final shape, repealed prohibitory 
 acts made during the war, removed the formalities which at- 
 tended the admission of ships from the colonies during their 
 state of dependency, and for a hmited time left the power of 
 regulating commerce with America to the king in council. 
 
 Immediately the proclamation of an order in council of 
 the second of July confined the trade between the American 
 states and the British West India islands to British-built ships 
 owned and navigated " by British subjects." " Undoubtedly," 
 wrote the king, " the Americans cannot expect nor ever will 
 receive any favor from me."f To an American, Fox said : 
 " For myself, I have no objection to opening the West India 
 trade to the Americans, but there are many parties to please." J 
 
 The blow fell heavily on America, and compelled a read- 
 justment of its industry. Ships had been its great manufac- 
 ture for exportation. For nicety of workmanship, the pahn 
 was awarded to Philadelphia, but nowhere could they be built 
 so cheaply as at Boston. More than one third of the tonnage 
 employed in British commerce before the war was of Ameri- 
 can construction. Britain renounced this resource. The con- 
 tinent and West India islands had prospered by the convenient 
 interchange of their produce ; the trade between nearest and 
 friendliest neighbors was forbidden, till England should find 
 out that she was waging war against a higher power than 
 the United States ; that her adversary was nature itseK. Her 
 statesmen confounded the " navigation act " and " the marine 
 of Britain ; " * the one the offspring of selfishness, the other 
 the sublime display of the creative power of a free people, 
 
 * Almon, xxviii., 180, 181. 
 
 f Correspondence of George III. with Lord North, ii., 442. 
 X Diplomatic Correspondence, 1783-1787, ii., 513 ; Fox to Hartley, 10 June 
 1783. MS. * Sheffield's Commerce of the American States, preface, 10. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN. 49 
 
 Such was the issue between the ancient nation which falsely j 
 and foolishly and mischievously believed that its superiority \ 
 in commerce was due to artificial legislation, and a young peo- \ 
 pie which solicited free trade. Yet thrice blessed was this 
 assertion of monopoly by an ignorant parliament, for it went 
 forth as a summons to the commercial and the manufacturing 
 interests of the American states and to the self-respect and 
 patriotism of their citizens to speak an efficient government 
 into being. 
 
 Full of faith in the rising power of America, Jay, on the 
 seventeenth of July, wrote to Gouverneur Morris : " The pres- 
 ent ministry are duped by an opinion of our not having union 
 and energy sufficient to retaliate their restrictions. JSTo time is 
 to be lost in raising and maintaining a national spirit in Amer- 
 ica. Power to govern the confederacy as to all general pur- 
 poses should be granted and exercised. In a word, everthing 
 conducive to union and constitutional energy should be culti- 
 vated, cherished, and protected." * Two days later he wrote 
 to William Livingston of ]^ew Jersey : " A continental, na- 
 tional spirit should pervade our country, and congress should 
 be enabled, by a grant of the necessary powers, to regulate the 
 commerce and general concerns of the confederacy." On the 
 same day, meeting Hartley, the British envoy, Jay said to 
 him : " The British ministry will find us like a globe — not to 
 be overset. They wish to be the only carriers between their 
 islands and other countries ; and though they are apprized of 
 our right to regulate our trade as we please, yet I suspect they 
 flatter themselves that the different states possess too little 
 of a national or continental spirit ever to agree in any one na- 
 tional system. I think they will find themselves mistaken." 
 " The British ministers," so Gouverneur Morris in due time 
 replied to Jay, " are deceived, for their conduct itself will 
 give congress a power to retahate their restrictions. f This 
 country has never yet been known in Europe, least of all to 
 England, because they constantly view it through a medium 
 of prejudice or of faction. True it is that the general gov- 
 ernment wants energy, and equally true it is that this want 
 
 * Jay to G. Morris, 17 July 1783. Sparks's Life of G. Morris, !., 258. 
 f Gouverneur Morris to Jay, 24 September 1783. Sparks's G. Morris, i., 259. 
 yoL. VI. — 4 
 
50 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; ch. m. 
 
 will eventually be supplied. Do not ask the Britisli to take 
 oft' their foolish restrictions ; the present regulation does us 
 more political good than commercial mischief." * 
 
 On the side of those in England who were wilHng to ac- 
 cept the doctrines of free trade, Josiah Tucker, the dean of 
 Gloucester, remarked : " As to the future grandeur of Amer- 
 ica, and its being a rising empire, under one head, whether 
 repubhcan or monarchical, it is one of the idlest and most 
 visionary notions that ever was conceived even by writers of 
 romance. The mutual antipathies and clashing interests of the 
 Americans, their difference of governments, habitudes, and 
 manners, indicate that they will have no centre of union and 
 no common interest. They never can be united into one com- 
 pact empire under any species of government whatever ; a dis- 
 united people till the end of time, suspicious and distrustful 
 of each other, they will be divided and subdivided into little 
 commonwealths or principalities, according to natural bounda- 
 ries, by great bays of the sea, and by vast rivers, lakes, and 
 ridges of mountains." f 
 
 The principle of trade adopted by the coalition ministry 
 Sheffield set forth with authority in a pamphlet, which was 
 accepted as an oracle. " There should be no treaty with the 
 American states because they will not place England on a bet- 
 ter footing than France and Holland, and equal rights will be 
 enjoyed of course without a treaty. The nominal subjects of 
 congress in the distant and boundless regions of the valley 
 of the Mississippi will speedily imitate and multiply the exam- 
 ples of independence. It will not be an easy matter to bring 
 the American states to act as a nation ; they are not to be 
 feared as such by us. The confederation does not enable con- 
 gress to form more than general treaties ; when treaties be- 
 come necessary, they must be made with the states separately. 
 Each state has reserved every power relative to imposts, ex- 
 ports, prohibitions, duties, etc., to itseK. :j: If the American 
 states choose to send consuls, receive them and send a consul 
 to each state. Each state will soon enter into all necessary 
 
 * Gouverneur Morris to Jay, 10 January 178-1. Ibid., 266, 267. 
 
 f Dean Tucker's Cui Bono, 1781, 117-119. 
 
 X Sheffield's Commerce of the American States, 183, 190, 191, 198-200. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN. 51 
 
 regulations with the consul, and this is the whole that is neces- 
 sary.* The American states will not have a very free trade 
 in the Mediterranean, if the Barbary states know their inter- 
 ests. That the Barbary states are advantageous to the mari- 
 time powers is certain ; if they were suppressed, little states 
 would have nmch more of the carrying trade. The armed 
 neutrality would be as hurtful to the great maritime powers as 
 the Barbary states are useful." f 
 
 In London it was a maxim among the merchants that, if 
 there were no Algiers, it would be worth England's while to 
 build one. :j: 
 
 Already the navigation act was looked to as a protection to 
 Enghsh commerce, because it would require at least three 
 fourths of the crews of American ships to be Americans ; and 
 they pretended that during the war three fourths of the crews 
 of the American privateers were Europeans.* The exclusion 
 of European seamen from service in the American marine was 
 made a part of British policy from the first establishment of 
 the peace. 
 
 In August, Laurens, by the advice of his associates, came 
 over to England to inquire whether a minister from the United 
 States of America would be properly received. " Most un- 
 doubtedly," answered Fox, and Laurens left England in that 
 belief, j But the king, when his pleasure was taken, said : " I 
 certainly can never express its being agreeable to me ; and, 
 indeed, I should think it wisest for both parties to have only 
 agents who can settle any matters of commerce. That revolted 
 state certainly for years cannot establish a stable government." ^ 
 The plan at court was to divide the United States, and for 
 that end to receive only consuls from each one of the separate 
 states and not a minister for the whole. ^ 
 
 British statesmen had begun to regret that any treaty 
 whatever had been made with the United States collectively ; 
 they would have granted independence and peace, but without 
 
 * Sheffield's Commerce of the United States, 211. f Ibid., 204, 206, note. 
 I Franklin in Diplomatic Correspondence, iv., 149. 
 
 * Sheffield's Commerce of the American States, 205, note. 
 I Diplomatic Correspondence, ii., 510-515. 
 
 ^ King to Fox, 7 August 1783 ; Memorials of Fox, ii., 141. 
 Adh^mar to Vergennes, 7 August 1783. MS. 
 
52 THE CONFEDERATION b.i.;oh.iii. 
 
 furtlier stipulations of any kind, so tliat all other questions 
 might have been left at loose ends. Even Fox was disinclined 
 to impart any new Hfe to the provisional articles agreed upon 
 by the ministry which he supplanted. He repeatedly avowed 
 the opinion that " a definitive treaty with the United States 
 was perfectly superfluous." * The American commissioners 
 became uneasy ; but Yergennes pledged himself not to pro- 
 ceed without them,f and Fox readily yielded. On the third 
 of September, when the minister of France and the ambassa- 
 dors of Great Britain and Spain concluded their conventions 
 at Versailles, the American provisional articles, shaped into a 
 definitive treaty, were signed by Hartley for Great Britain ; by 
 Adams, Franklin, and Jay for the United States of America. 
 
 The coalition ministry did not last long enough to exchange 
 ratifications. To save the enormous expense of maintaining 
 the British army in ITew York, Fox hastened its departure ; 
 but while " the speedy and complete evacuation of all the ter- 
 ritories of the United States " J was authoritatively promised 
 to the American commissioners at Paris in the name of the 
 king. Lord North, acting on the petition of merchants inter- 
 ested in the Canada trade,* withheld orders for the evacuation 
 of the western and north-western interior posts, although by 
 the treaty they were as much an integral part of the United 
 States as Albany or Boston ; and this policy, like that relating 
 to commerce, was continued by the ministry that succeeded 
 him. 
 
 We may not turn away from England without relating 
 that Pitt for the second time proposed in the house of com- 
 mons, though in vain, a change in the representation, by intro- 
 ducing one hundred new members from the counties and from 
 the metropohs. Universal suffrage he condemned, and the 
 privilege of the owners of rotten boroughs to name members 
 of parliament had for him the sanctity of private property, to 
 
 * Fox to duke of Manchester, 9 August 1783. Same to same, 4 August 1783. 
 MS. Same to Hartley 4 August 1783. MS. 
 
 f Hartley to Fox, 31 July 1783. MS. 
 
 X Fox to Hartley, 10 June 1783. MS. Compare Fox to Hartley, 15 May 
 1783. MS. 
 
 * Regulations proposed by the merchants interested in the trade to the prov- 
 ince of Quebec, 1783. MS. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN. 63 
 
 be taken away only after compensation. "Mankind," said 
 Fox, "are made for themselves, not for others. The best 
 government is that in which the people have the greatest share. 
 The present motion will not go far enough ; but, as it is an 
 amendment, I give it my hearty support." 
 
 An early and a most beneficent result of the American 
 revolution was a reform of the British colonial system. Taxa- 
 tion of colonies by the parliament of Great Britain, treat- 
 ment of them as worthless except as drudges for the enrich- 
 ment of the ruling kingdom, plans of governing them on the 
 maxims of a Hillsborough or a Thurlow,"^ came to an end. It 
 grew to be the rule to give them content by the establishment 
 of liberal constitutions. 
 
 * SheflSeld's Commerce of the American States, 1Y5-180. 
 
54 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. iv. 
 
 CHAPTEE lY. 
 
 AIMEKICA AITD CONTINENTAL EUROPE. 
 1783. 
 
 The governments of continental Europe vied with eacli 
 other in welcoming the new republic to its place among the 
 powers of the world. In May 1782, as soon as it was known 
 at Stockholm that the negotiations for peace were begun, the 
 adventurous king of Sweden sent messages of his desire, 
 through Franklin above all others, to enter into a treaty with 
 the United States. Franklin promptly accepted the invita- 
 tion. The ambassador of Gustavus at Paris remarked : " I 
 hope it will be remembered that Sweden was the first power 
 in Europe which, without being sohcited, offered its friendship 
 to the United States." * Exactly five months before the de- 
 finitive peace between the United States and Great Britain was 
 signed, the treaty with Sweden was concluded. Each party 
 was put on the footing of the most favored nations. Free 
 ships were to make passengers free as well as goods. Liberty 
 of commerce was to extend to all kinds of merchandise. The 
 number of contraband articles was carefully hmited. In case 
 of a maritime war in which both the contracting parties should 
 remain neutral, their ships of war were to protect and assist 
 each other's vessels. The treaty was ratified and proclaimed 
 in the United States before the definitive treaty with Great 
 Britain had arrived.f 
 
 The successful termination of the war aroused in Prussia 
 hope for the new birth of Europe, that, by the teachings of 
 America, despotism might be struck down, and the caste of 
 
 * Franklin's Works, ix., 342. f Journals of Congress, iv., 241. 
 
1783. AMERICA AN^D CONTINENTAL EUROPE. 55 
 
 hereditary nobility give place to republican equality. These 
 aspirations were suffered to be printed at Berlin.* 
 
 The great Frederick had, late in 1Y82, declared to the 
 British minister at his court, half in earnest and half cajoling, 
 that " he was persuaded the American union could not long 
 subsist under its present form. The great extent of country 
 would alone be a sufficient obstacle, since a republican govern- 
 ment had never been known to exist for any length of time 
 where the territory was not limited and concentred. It would 
 not be more absurd to propose the establishment of a democ- 
 racy to govern the whole country from Brest to Riga. JSTo 
 inference could be drawn from the states of Yenice, Holland, 
 and Switzerland, of which the situation and circumstances 
 were perfectly different from those of the colonies." f He 
 did not know the power of the representative system.-, nor could 
 he foresee that by the wise use of it the fourth of his succes- 
 sors would evoke the German state from the eclipse of centu- 
 ries, to shine with replenished light as the empire of a people. 
 For the moment he kept close watch of the progress of the 
 convention with Sweden, and, so soon as it was signed, directed 
 his minister in France to make overtures to Franklin, which 
 were most gladly received. :j: 
 
 Full seven months before the peace a member of the 
 government at Brussels intimated to William Lee, a former 
 commissioner of congress at the court of "Vienna, that Joseph 
 II., who at that time harbored the hope of restoring to Belgian 
 commerce its rights by opening the Scheldt and so preparing 
 the way for a direct trade with America, was disposed to enter 
 into a treaty with the United States.* Soon after the pre- 
 hminaries of peace between France and Great Britain had been 
 signed, the emperor let it be insinuated to Franklin that he 
 would be well received at Vienna as the minister of a sovereign 
 power. II In the following year an agent was sent from Bel- 
 
 * Die Freiheit Amerika's. Ode vom Herra Pr. J. E. H. Berlinische Monats- 
 schrift, April 1783, 386. See J. Scherr's Kultur und Sittengescbichte, 508, 619. 
 
 f Sir John Stepney to secretary of state, 22 October 1782. MS. 
 X Goltz to Frederick, 3 March, 28 April, 80 June 1783. MSS. 
 
 * William Lee to secretary of foreign affairs, 31 March 1782, Diplomatic 
 Correspondence, ii., 360. 
 
 I Letter to Franklin from Vienna, 8 April 1*783, Franklin's Works, ix., 501. 
 
56 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; ch. iv. 
 
 gium to the United States. The Belgians produced in unsur- 
 passed excellence manufactures which America needed; but 
 they were not enterprising enough to estabhsh houses in Amer- 
 ica, or to grant its merchants the extended credits which were 
 offered in England."^ The subject gained less and less atten- 
 tion, for the emperor was compelled, in violation of natural 
 rights, to suffer the Scheldt to be closed. 
 
 On the twenty - second of February 1783, Eosencrone, 
 minister of foreign affairs in Denmark, communicated to 
 Franklin " the satisfaction with which the king's ministry had 
 learned the glorious issue of the war for the United States of 
 America," and their desire to form connections of friendship 
 and commerce. " To overtures for a treaty like that between 
 congress and the states general," he added, " we should eagerly 
 and frankly reply." But a question of indemnity for viola- 
 tions of neutrality by Denmark during the war impeded the 
 negotiation. 
 
 Before the end of March the burgomaster and senate of 
 the imperial free city of Hamburg, seeing " European powers 
 courting in rivalry the friendship of " the new state, and im- 
 pressed with "the illustrious event" of the acknowledged in- 
 dependence of America as "the wonder of that age and of 
 remotest ages to come," deputed one of their citizens to bear 
 to congress their letter, offering free trade between the two 
 republics. 
 
 In midsummer, 1783, Portugal made overtures to treat 
 with Franklin, but did not persist in them. 
 
 Bussia was at that time too much engrossed by affairs in 
 the East to take thought for opening new channels of com- 
 merce with the "West ; and the United States, recalling their 
 minister, declined to make advances. But the two nations, 
 without any mutual stipulations, had rendered each other the 
 most precious services. Catherine had scornfully refused to 
 lend troops to George III., rejected his entreaties for an alli- 
 ance, and by the armed neutrality insulated his kingdom ; the 
 United States, by giving full employment to the maritime 
 powers, had made for the empress the opportunity of annex- 
 ing to her dominions the plains of Kuban and the Crimea. 
 
 * Correspondence of the Austrian agent, Baron de Beelen Bertholff. MS. 
 
1783. AMERICA AND CONTINENTAL EUROPE. 57 
 
 Of the chief commercial nations of Europe, Holland enter- 
 tained for America the most friendly sentiments, invited her 
 trade, and readily granted to her congress all the credit which 
 it had any right to expect. 
 
 The independence of the United States gave umbrage to 
 the Spanish court. Galvez, the minister of the colonies, was 
 fiercely and persistently hostile to the extent of the United 
 States in the South-west. Florida Blanca himself wished for 
 amicable rectifications of the boundary; but, on the remon- 
 strances of Lafayette, he, in the presence of the ambassador of 
 France, pledged his word of honor to accept the boundary as 
 laid down in the Anglo-American treaty, and authorized La- 
 fayette to bind him with congress to that pledge. The Spanish 
 statesmen feared the loss of their own colonies, and the success 
 of the American revolution excited new and never-ceasing 
 alarm. They could have wished that North America might 
 disappear from the face of the earth ; but they tried to recon- 
 cile themselves to living in good harmony with the United 
 States. The Mississippi was the great source of anxiety. 
 
 Spain thought it not for her interest that the American 
 states should consolidate their union. She had dreaded the 
 neighborhood of English colonies to her own; she dreaded 
 still more to border all the way from the Atlantic to the foun- 
 tains of the Mississippi on a republic whose colossal growth 
 was distinctly foreseen. Besides this, the suppression of a 
 rebellion in South America had just cost more than a hundred 
 thousand lives; and the difficulty of governing distant and 
 boundless regions was so great that Aranda, the far-sighted 
 statesman who had signed the treaty of peace, in his official 
 dispatches to Florida Blanca, set forth the opinion that Por- 
 tugal would be worth more to Spain than all the American 
 main-land. Of the islands he never depreciated the value ; but 
 he clearly perceived how precarious was the hold of Spain on 
 her continental possessions ; and he left on record the advice, 
 which he may never have had an opportunity to offer person- 
 ally to his king, that Spain should transform all the vice-royal- 
 ties in America into secundo-genitures, retaining in direct 
 dependence only Cuba and Porto Kico.* 
 
 * Ferro del Rio, iii., 460, 407, note. Muriel, vi, 45-54. Revista Espanola de 
 
58 THE COirrEDERATION'. b. i. ; oh. iv. 
 
 Even Yergennes, while he believed that the attachment of 
 America to the alliance would be safest if the confederation 
 could keep itself alive, held it best for France that the United 
 States should fail to attain the political consistency of which 
 he saw that they were susceptible ; and he remained a tranquil 
 spectator of their efforts for a better constitution. Lafayette 
 not only watched over the interests of America in Europe, 
 but to the president of congress and to the secretary for for- 
 eign affairs he sent messages imploring American patriots to 
 strengthen the federal union. 
 
 Ambos Mundos, for May 1855, written by Ferro del Rio. In his letter on ex- 
 changing for Portugal the Spanish possessions in America, Aranda writes, " ex- 
 ceptuando las islas." The train of thought is the same. 
 
1783. A CALL ON THE AKMY TO INTERPOSE. 69 
 
 CHAPTEE Y. 
 
 A CALL 0:N" the AK^IY to mTEEPOSE. 
 
 Januaey-March 1783. 
 
 In the fall of 1782 tlie main aimj was moved for winter 
 quarters to the wooded hills in the rear of Newbnrg. No part 
 of the community had undergone equal hardships or borne 
 injustice with equal patriotism. In the leisure of the camp thej 
 brooded over their wrongs and their chances of redress, and at 
 the close of the year the officers sent to Philadelphia as their 
 committee Major-General Macdougall and Colonels Ogdeh and 
 Brooks, who, in their address of the sixth of January 1783, 
 used these words : 
 
 " To the United States in congress assembled : "We, the 
 officers of the army of the United States, in behaK of ourselves 
 and our brethren the soldiers, beg leave freely to state to the 
 supreme power, our head and sovereign, the great distress 
 under which we labor. Our embarrassments thicken so fast 
 that many of us are unable to go farther. Shadows have been 
 offered to us, while the substance has been gleaned by others. 
 The citizens murmur at the greatness of their taxes, and no 
 part reaches the army. We have borne all that men can bear. 
 Our property is expended ; our private resources are at an end. 
 We therefore beg that a supply of money may be forwarded 
 to the army as soon as possible. 
 
 " The uneasiness of the soldiers for want of pay is great 
 and dangerous; further experiments on their patience may 
 have fatal effects. There is a balance due for retained rations, 
 forage, and arrearages on the score of clothing. Whenever 
 there has been a real want of means, defect in system, or 
 
60 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; ch. v. 
 
 neglect in execution, we liave invariably been the sufferers by 
 hunger and nakedness, and by languishing in a hospital. "We 
 beg leave to urge an immediate adjustment of all dues. 
 
 " We see with chagrin the odious point of view in which 
 the citizens of too many of the states endeavor to place the 
 men entitled to half -pay. For the honor of human nature we 
 hope that there are none so hardened in the sin of ingratitude 
 as to deny the justice of the reward. To prevent altercations, 
 we are willing to commute the half -pay pledged for full-pay 
 for a certain number of years, or for a sum in gross. And 
 in this we pray that the disabled officers and soldiers, with the 
 widows and orphans of those who have expended, or may ex- 
 pend, their lives in the service of their country, may be fully 
 comprehended. 
 
 '' General dissatisfaction is gaining ground in the army, 
 from evils and injuries which, in the course of seven long 
 years, have made their condition in many instances wretched. 
 They therefore entreat that congress, to convince the army 
 and the world that the independence of America shall not be 
 placed on the ruin of any particular class of her citizens, will 
 point out a mode for immediate redress." 
 
 The grand committee to whom the memorial was referred 
 held a conference with the superintendent of finance. He de- 
 clared peremptorily that it was impossible, in the present state 
 of the finances, to make any payment to the army, and that it 
 would be imprudent to give assurances with regard to future 
 pay until funds that could be relied upon should be estab- 
 Hshed. Not only had he no money in hand, but he had over- 
 drawn his account in Europe to the amount of three and a half 
 milHons of Hvres. He therefore asked a decision on the ex- 
 pediency of staking the public credit on further drafts to be 
 met by the contingent proceeds of a loan from the Dutch and 
 by the friendship of France. On the tenth of January, con- 
 gress, under an injunction of secrecy, authorized the superin- 
 tendent to draw bills on the credit of applications for loans in 
 Europe. Dyer of Connecticut alone opposed the measure as 
 unwarranted and dishonorable, but allowed the resolution to 
 be entered as unanimous.* 
 
 * Gilpin, 248-252, 299 ; Elliot, 21, 22, 38 ; Secret Journals of Congress, i., 253. 
 
1783. A CALL ON THE ARMY TO INTERPOSE. 61 
 
 In an interview with tlie grand committee on tlie evening 
 of tlie thirteenth,* the deputies from the army explained that, 
 without an immediate payment of some part of the overdue 
 pay, the discontent alike of officers and soldiers could not be 
 soothed ; that a mutiny might ensue ; and that it would be 
 hard to punish soldiers for a breach of engagements to the 
 public which the public itself had already flagrantly broken. 
 " The army," said Macdougall, " is verging to that state which, 
 we are told, will make a wise man mad." It was a source of 
 irritation that the members of the legislatures never adjourned 
 till they had paid themselves fully, that aU on the civil Hsts 
 of the United States regularly received their salaries, and that 
 all on the military lists were as regularly left unpaid, f 
 
 The deputies animadverted with surprise and even indig- 
 nation on the repugnance of some of the states to establish a 
 federal revenue for discharging federal engagements, while the 
 affluence of the people indicated adequate resources. Speak- 
 ing with pecuhar emphasis and making a strong impression by 
 his manner. General Macdougall declared " that the most in- 
 telligent part of the army were deeply touched by the debility 
 of the federal government and the unwillingness of the states 
 to invigorate it ; in case of its dissolution, the benefits expected 
 from the revolution would be greatly impaired ; and the con- 
 tests which might ensue among the states would be sure to 
 embroil their respective officers." 
 
 Hamilton had for himself renounced the half-pay. The 
 grand committee, in their report which he drafted, advised, 
 some payment to the army as soon as possible ; for the rest, 
 they were to have no priority over other creditors ; all were to 
 wait alike for the funding of the whole debt of the United 
 States by general revenues. The officers were to have the op- 
 tion of preserving their claim to half -pay as it then stood, or 
 accepting a commutation. J 
 
 " A great majority of the members of congress," avowed 
 Robert Morris, " will not adopt the necessary measures be- 
 cause they are afraid of offending their states ; " and he un- 
 
 * Gilpin, 256, 261 ; Elliot, 23. 
 
 f Gilpin, 256-258 ; Elliot, 23, 24 ; Washington to J. Jones, Sparks, viii., 370. 
 
 X HamiltoD, i., 274 ; Gilpin, 276, 277 ; Elliot, 29, 30, 
 
62 THE CONFEDERATION". b. i. ; oh. v. 
 
 dertook to drive them to decisive action. Accordingly, on the 
 twenty-fourth, the day on which the report was taken np, he 
 sent to them his resignation of office in these words : " The 
 funding the public debts on solid revenues, I fear, will never 
 be made. If before the end of May effectual measures to 
 make permanent provision for the public debts of every kind 
 are not taken, congress will be pleased to appoint some other 
 man to be the superintendent of their finances : I will never be 
 the minister of injustice." The design of Robert Morris re- 
 quired the immediate publication of his letter, that, by uniting 
 the army with all other creditors, congress and the states might 
 be coerced into an efficient system ; but congress reasoned 
 that this authoritative statement of the financial ruin of the 
 country would encourage the enemy, annihilate foreign and 
 domestic credit, and provoke the army to mutiny. They 
 therefore placed the communication under the injunction of 
 secrecy.'^ 
 
 Resuming the consideration of the report of their grand 
 committee on the memorial from the army, they referred a 
 present payment to the discretion of the superintendent of 
 finance; and, on the fifth of February, he issued a warrant, 
 out of which the officers received one month's pay in notes 
 and the private soldiers one month's pay in weekly instalments 
 of half a dollar, f 
 
 The annual amount of the half-pay promised to the officers 
 for life was nearly five hundred thousand dollars. The valid- 
 ity of the engagement was questioned. The grant was dis- 
 liked by the common soldiers ; it found no favor in the legis- 
 lature of Massachusetts; the delegates of Connecticut and 
 Rhode Island were instructed to oppose it altogether. To 
 avoid defeat, this article was laid over till there should be a 
 fuller representation. J Delegates from the states in which 
 the domestic debt was chiefly held hoped for efficient co- 
 operation from the army. Pennsylvania was the largest credit- 
 or ; Massachusetts ranked next ; South CaroHna, Georgia, and 
 
 * Diplomatic Correspondence, xii., 325-328. Gilpin, 274, 275 ; Elliot, 29. 
 
 f Report of the deputies in Sparks, viii., 552. The amount of this one month's 
 pay was 253,232.86 dollars. Old account-books in Treasury department. Waste- 
 book D, Ledger B. MS. i Gilpin, 281, 321 ; Elliot, 31, 45. 
 
1783. A CALL OIT THE ARMY TO INTERPOSE. 63 
 
 Delaware were the lowest ; Yirginia was but the nintli, hold- 
 ing less than l^ew Hampshire and not half so much as Khode 
 Island. The zeal for the equal support of all classes of public 
 creditors culminated in those states whose citizens originally 
 owned nearly four times as much as those of all the six south- 
 ern states, and by transfers were constantly acquiring more.* 
 
 Adopting unanimously a resolution which Hamilton had 
 prepared, congress pledged itself to consider immediately the 
 most likely mode of obtaining revenues adequate to the fund- 
 ing of the whole debt of the United States.f Encouraged 
 by this seeming heartiness, Wilson of Pennsylvania, on the 
 twenty-seventh, proposed " the establishment of general funds 
 to be collected by congress." j;. To the dismay of the friends 
 of a general revenue, Theodorick Bland of Yirginia interposed 
 and officially presented the act of his state repealing the grant 
 of the impost, and a resolution of both its houses declarhig its 
 present inability to pay more than fifty thousand pounds Vir- 
 ginia currency toward the demands of congress for 1782.* 
 
 The debate, nevertheless, went on. Gorham of Massachu- 
 setts suggested polls and commerce as most proper objects of 
 taxation. Hamilton, discussing the subject in a comprehen- 
 sive manner, spoke for permanent sources of revenue which 
 should extend uniformly throughout the United States, and 
 be collected by the authority of congress. Dyer strongly dis- 
 hked the appointment of collectors by congress ; the states 
 would never consent to it. Ramsay of South Carolina sup- 
 ported Gorham and Hamilton. Again Bland placed himself 
 in the way, saying : " The states are so averse to a general 
 revenue in the hands of congress that, even if it were proper, 
 it is unattainable." He therefore advised congress to pursue 
 the rule of the confederation and ground requisitions on an 
 actual valuation of houses and lands in the several states. 
 
 At this stage of the discussion, an efficient reply could be 
 made only by one who was of Yirginia. To Randolph, then 
 in Richmond, Madison had already written : " Virginia could 
 never have cut off the impost at a more unlucky crisis than 
 
 * Gilpin, 364, note ; Elliot, 60. f Gilpin, 211, 280 ; Elliot, 30, 31. 
 t Gilpin, 282, 285 ; Elliot, 32. 
 
 * Resolution of 28 December 1782. in Journal of the Delegates, 80, 90. 
 
64: THE CONFEDERATIOK b. i. ; ch. v. 
 
 when she is protesting her inability to comply with the conti- 
 nental requisitions. Congress cannot abandon the plan as long 
 as there is a spark of hope. ISTay, other plans on a like prin- 
 ciple must be added. Justice, gratitude, our reputation abroad 
 and our tranquillity at home, require provision for a debt of 
 not less than fifty millions of dollars ; and this provision will 
 not be adequately met by separate acts of the states. If there 
 are not revenue laws which operate at the same time through 
 all the states, and are exempt from the control of each, mutual 
 jealousies will assuredly defraud both our foreign and domes- 
 tic creditors of their just claims." * 
 
 Madison, on the twenty-eighth, presented a milder form 
 of the resolution for a general revenue. Arthur Lee lost no 
 time in confronting his colleague : " The states will never con- 
 sent to a uniform tax, because it will be unequal ; is repug- 
 nant to the articles of confederation ; and, by placing the purse 
 in the same hands with the sword, subverts the fundamental 
 principles of liberty." Wilson explained : The articles of 
 confederation have expressly provided for amendments ; there 
 is more of a centrifugal than centripetal force in the states ; 
 the funding of a common debt would invigorate the union. 
 Ellsworth despaired of a continental revenue ; condemned pe- 
 riodical requisitions from congress as inadequate ; and inclined 
 to the trial of permanent state funds. In reply, Hamilton 
 showed that state funds would meet with even greater obsta- 
 cles than a general revenue ; but he lost the sympathy of the 
 house by adding that the influence of federal collectors would 
 assist in giving energy to the federal government. Eutledge 
 thought that the prejudices of the people were opposed to a 
 general tax, and seemed disinclined to it himself. Williamson 
 was of opinion that continental funds, though desirable, were 
 unattainable. 
 
 " The idea," said Madison, " of erecting our national inde- 
 pendence on the ruins of public faith and national honor must 
 be homd to every mind which retains either honesty or pride. 
 Is a continental revenue indispensably necessary for doing 
 complete justice to the public creditors ? This is the question. 
 
 * Madison to Randolph, 22 January IVSS, in Gilpin, 111. The date is erro- 
 neously given as of 1*782. 
 
1783. A CALL ON THE AKMY TO INTERPOSE. 65 
 
 " A punctual compliance by thirteen independent govern- 
 ments with periodical demands of money from congress can 
 never be reckoned upon with certainty. The articles of con- 
 federation authorize congress to borrow money. To borrow 
 money, permanent and certain provision is necessary ; and, as 
 this cannot be made in any other way, a general revenue is 
 within the spirit of the confederation. Congress are already 
 invested by the states with constitutional authority over the 
 purse as well as the sword. A general revenue would only 
 give this authority a more certain and equal efficacy. 
 
 " The necessity and reasonableness of a general revenue 
 have been gaining ground among the states. I am aware that 
 one exception ought to be made. The state of Yirginia, as 
 appears by an act yesterday laid before congress, has withdrawn 
 its assent once given to the scheme. This circumstance can- 
 not but embarrass a representative of that state advocating it ; 
 one, too, whose principles are extremely unfavorable to a dis- 
 regard of the sense of constituents. But, though the dele- 
 gates who compose congress more immediately represent and 
 are amenable to the states from which they come, yet they owe 
 a fidelity to the collective interests of the whole. The part I 
 take is the more fully justified to my own mind by my thor- 
 ough persuasion that, with the same knowledge of public affairs 
 which my station commands, the legislature of Yirginia would 
 not have repealed the law in favor of the impost, and would 
 even now rescind the repeal.'* 
 
 On the following day the proposition of Wilson and Madi 
 son, wdth slight amendments, passed the committee of the 
 whole without opposition. On the tweKth of February it 
 was adopted in congress by seven states in the affirmative, and 
 without the negative of any state. 
 
 For methods of revenue, the choice of Madison was an 
 impost, a poll-tax which should rate blacks somewhat lower 
 than whites, and a moderate land-tax. To these Wilson 
 wished to add a duty on salt and an excise on wine, imported 
 spirits, and coffee. Hamilton, who held the attempt at a 
 land-tax to be futile and impossible, suggested a house- and 
 window-tax. Wolcott of Connecticut thought requisitions 
 should be in proportion to the population of each state ; but 
 
 VOL. VI. — 5 
 
QQ THE CONFEDERATIOiSr. b. i. ; oh. v. 
 
 was willing to include in the enumeration those only of the 
 blacks who were within sixteen and sixty years of age.* 
 
 Just at this time Pelatiah Webster, a graduate of Yale 
 college, in a dissertation published at Philadelphia, f proposed 
 for the legislature of the United States a congress of two 
 houses which should have ample authority for making laws 
 " of general necessity and utiUty," and enforcing them as well 
 on individuals as on states. He further suggested not only 
 heads of executive departments, but judges of law and chan- 
 cery. The tract was reprinted in Hartford, and called forth a 
 reply. 
 
 Plans of closer union offered only a remote solution of the 
 difficulties under which the confederation was sinking. How 
 the united demand of all public creditors could wrest imme- 
 diately from congress and the states the grant of a general 
 revenue and power for its collection employed the thoughts of 
 Sobert Morris and his friends. On Christmas eve 1781, Gou- 
 verneur Morris, the assistant financier, had written to Greene : 
 " I have no expectation that the government will acquire force ; 
 and no hope that our union can subsist, except in the form of 
 an absolute monarchy, and this does not seem to consist with 
 the taste and temper of the people." To Jay, in January 
 1783, :|: he wrote : " The army have swords in their hands. 
 Good will arise from the situation to which we are hastening ; 
 much of convulsion will probably ensue, yet it must terminate 
 in giving to government that power without which govern- 
 ment is but a name." 
 
 Hamilton held it as certain that the army had secretly de- 
 termined not to lay down their arms until due provision and 
 a satisfactory prospect should be afforded on the subject of 
 their pay; that the commander-in-chief was already become 
 extremely unpopular among all ranks from his known dislike 
 to every unlawful proceeding; but, as from his virtue, his 
 patriotism, and firmness, he would sooner suffer himself to be 
 cut in pieces than yield to disloyal plans, Hamilton wished him 
 
 * Gilpin, 300, 304-306, 331; Elliot, 38-40, 48. 
 
 I A Dissertation on the Political Union and Constitution of the thirteen United 
 States of North America, written 16 February 1783. In Pelatiah Webster's Po- 
 litical Essays, 228. | Sparks's G. Morris, i., 240, 249. 
 
1783. A CALL ON THE ARMY TO INTERPOSE. 67 
 
 to be the " conductor of the army in their plans for redress," 
 to the exclusion of a leader like Horatio Gates.* 
 
 With these convictions and with exceeding caution, he, on 
 the seventh of February, addressed himself directly to Wash- 
 ington in a letter, of which Brooks, on his return to the camp, 
 was the bearer. " We," so he wrote of congress, " are a body 
 not governed by reason or foresight, but by circumstances. It 
 appears to be a prevailing opinion in the army that, if they 
 once lay down their arms, they part with the means of obtain- 
 ing justice. Their claims, urged with moderation but with 
 firmness, may operate on those weak minds which are influ- 
 enced by their apprehensions more than by their judgments, so 
 as to produce a concurrence in the measures which the exigen- 
 cies of affairs demand. To restore public credit is the object of 
 all men of sense ; in this the influence of the army, properly 
 directed, may co-operate." And he invited Washington to 
 make use of General Knox, f to whom Gouvernem- Morris 
 wrote on the same day and by the same channel. 
 
 To ensure the concerted action of the southern army, Gou- 
 verneur Morris wrote privately to Greene : " The main army 
 will not easily forego their expectations. Their murmurs, 
 though not loud, are deep. If the army, in common with all 
 other public creditors, insist on the grant of general, permanent 
 funds for liquidating all the public debts, there can be little 
 doubt that such revenues will be obtained, and will afford to 
 every order of public creditors a solid security. With the due 
 exception of miracles, there is no probabiHty that the states will 
 ever make such grants unless the army be united and deter- 
 mined in the pursuit of it, and unless they be firmly supported 
 by and as finnly support the other creditors. That this may 
 happen must be the entire wish of every intelligently just man 
 and of every real friend to our glorious revolution." :j: 
 
 The letter of Gouverneur Morris to Knox, which was in 
 reality a communication through Knox to Washington, cannot 
 be found. ' It evidently expressed the opinion that the army 
 might be made to co-operate in bringing about a closer union 
 
 * Gilpin, 350, 351 ; Elliot, 55. 
 
 f Hamilton to Washington, 7 February 17S3. Hamilton, i., 32*7. 
 
 X G. Morris to Greene, 15 February 1783. Sparks's G. Morris, i., 250. 
 
68 THE OONFEDERATIOIT. b. i. ; oh. v. 
 
 of tlie states and a stronger government. Tlie answer of Knox 
 expresses the advice of Washington : " The army are good 
 patriots, and would forward everything that wonld tend to 
 produce union and a permanent general constitution ; but they 
 are yet to he taught how their influence is to effect this mat- 
 ter. A * hoop to the barrel ' is their favorite toast. America 
 will have fought and bled to little purpose if the powers of 
 government shall be insufficient to preserve the peace, and this 
 must be the case without general funds. As the present con- 
 stitution is so defective, why do not you great men call the 
 people together and tell them so — ^that is, to have a convention 
 of the states to form a better constitution ? This appears to 
 us, who have a superficial view only, to be the most efficacious 
 remedy." * 
 
 On the thirteenth of February the speech of the king of 
 Great Britain, at the opening of parliament in December, was 
 received. His announcement of provisional articles of peace 
 with the United States produced great joy ; yet that joy was 
 clouded by apprehensions from the impossibility of meeting 
 the just claims of the army. 
 
 Congress was brought no nearer to decisive action. Ham- 
 ilton proposed that the doors of congress should be thrown 
 wide open whenever the finances were under discussion, though 
 the proposal, had it been accepted, would have filled the gal- 
 leries with holders of certificates of the public debt, f 
 
 On the other side, John Rutledge again and again moved that 
 the proceeds of the impost should be appropriated exclusively 
 to the army, but was supported only by his own state. Euffled 
 by his indifference to the civil creditors, Wilson had one day 
 answered with warmth: "Pennsylvania will take her own 
 measures without regard to those of congress, and she ought 
 to do so. She is willing to sink or swim according to the 
 common fate ; but she will not suffer herself, with a millstone 
 of six millions of the continental debt, to go to the bottom 
 alone." 
 
 The weakness of the friends of a general revenue appeared 
 from their consenting to leave to the several states the ap- 
 
 * Knox to G. Morris, 21 February 1783, in Sparks's G. Morris, i., 256. 
 t Gilpin, 336, 341 ; Elliot, 50, 52. 
 
1783. A CALL ON THE ARMY TO INTERPOSE. 69 
 
 pointment of tlie collectors of taxes, and to limit the grant of 
 the impost to twenty-five years.* 
 
 Once more Mercer and Arthur Lee renewed their war 
 npon Madison, who in reply made a convincing plea for the 
 necessity of a permanent general revenue. " The purse," re- 
 peated Arthur Lee, " ought never to be put in the same hand 
 with the sword. I will be explicit ; I would rather see con- 
 gress a rope of sand than a rod of iron. Virginia ought not 
 to concur in granting to congress a permanent revenue." " If 
 the federal compact is such as has been represented," said Mer- 
 cer, " I will immediately withdraw from congress, and do every- 
 thing in my power to destroy its existence." Chafed by these 
 expressions, Gorham of Massachusetts cried out : " The sooner 
 this is known the better, that some of the states may form 
 other confederacies adequate to their safety." f 
 
 The assiduous labors of congress for two months had failed 
 to devise the means for restoring public credit. In February 
 some of its members thought the time had arrived when order 
 and credit could come, if the army would support its demands 
 by its strength. Robert Morris extorted from congress a re- 
 moval of the injunction of secrecy on his letter of resignation, 
 and forthwith sent it not only to Washington but to the public 
 press, through which it immediately reached the army. 
 
 * Gilpin, 314, 347, 348 ; Elliot, 43, 64. f Gilpin, 357, 611 ; Elliot, 57. 
 
70 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. vi. 
 
 CHAPTER YI. 
 
 THE AMERICAN AKMY AND ITS CHIEF. 
 Maech 1783. 
 
 The command er-in-cMef suppressed the wish to visit Mount 
 Yernon during the winter, for the arm j at ISTewburg was more 
 unquiet that at any former period.* The Massachusetts line 
 formed more than half of it, and so many of the remainder 
 were from other eastern states that he could describe them all 
 as E'ew England men. f He had made the delicate state of 
 affairs " the object of many contemplative hours," and he was 
 aware of the prevailing sentiment that the prospect of compen- 
 sation for past services would terminate with the war. :{: 
 
 'Now that peace was at hand, his first act was by a letter to 
 Harrison, then governor of Yirginia, to entreat his own state 
 to enter upon a movement toward a real union. '' From the 
 observations I have made in the course of this war — and my 
 intercourse with the states in their united as well as separate 
 capacities has afforded ample opportunities of judging — 1 am 
 decided in my opinion," such were his words, " that, if the 
 powers of congress are not enlarged and made competent to 
 all general purposes, the blood which has been spilt, the ex- 
 pense that has been incurred, and the distresses which have 
 been felt, will avail nothing; and that the band which holds 
 us togetlier, already too weak, will soon be broken ; when anar- 
 
 * Sparks, viii., 355, 369. 
 
 f Gorham in Gilpin, 315. Elliot, 43. Washington to Joseph Jones. Sparks, 
 viii., 383 ; and compare Sparks, viii., 456. 
 
 X Washington to Hamilton, 4 March 1'783. Sparks, viii., 389, 390. 
 
1783. THE AMERICAN AEMY AND ITS CHIEF. 71 
 
 chj and confusion will prevail.* I shall make no apology for 
 the freedom of these sentiments ; thej proceed from an honest 
 heart ; they will at least prove the sincerity of my friendship, 
 as they are altogether undisguised." The governor received 
 this letter as a public appeal, and placed it among the archives 
 of Yirginia. 
 
 Before the oSScers had taken into consideration the cautious 
 report of their committee to congress. Colonel Walter Stewart, 
 an inspector of troops, coming back from Philadelphia, pre- 
 sented himself at the quarters of Gates as " a kind of agent 
 from the friends of the army in congress ; " f and rumors were 
 immediately circulated through the camp that it was univer- 
 sally expected the army would not disband until they had ob- 
 tained justice ; that the public creditors looked up to them for 
 aid, and, if necessary, would even join them in the field ; that 
 some members of congress wished the measure might take 
 effect, in order to compel the public, particularly the delin- 
 quent states, to do justice. :j: 
 
 A plan of action was in the utmost secrecy devised by 
 Gates and those around him. To touch with ability the sev- 
 eral chords of feeling which lay slumbering in the army, his 
 aide-de-camp. Major John Armstrong, was selected to draft an 
 address. This was copied, and Colonel Barber, the assistant 
 adjutant-general of the division of Gates, taking care not to be 
 tracked, put it in circulation through the line of every state,* 
 with a notice for a meeting of the general and field officers on 
 the next day, to consider what measures should be adopted to 
 obtain that redress of grievances which they seemed to have 
 solicited in vain. || 
 
 " My friends ! " so ran the anonymous appeal, " after seven 
 long years your suffering courage has conducted the United 
 States of America through a doubtful and a bloody war ; and 
 
 * Washington to Harrison, 4 March 1783, Maxwell's Virginia Historical 
 Register, vi., 36, 37. 
 
 f Gates to Armstrong, 22 June 1783. I follow a manuscript copy received from 
 J. K. Armstrong. The letter has been printed in United States Magazine, i., 40. 
 
 X Washington to Joseph Jones, 12 March 1783. Sparks, viii., 393, 394. Wash- 
 ington to Eamilton, 12 March 1783. Hamilton, i., 343. 
 
 # Gates to Armstrong, 22 June, 1783. 1| Journal of Congress, iv., 208. 
 
72 THE CONFEDERATIOX. e. i. ; ch. vi. 
 
 peace returns to bless — whom ? A country willing to redress 
 your wrongs, cherish your worth, and reward your services ? 
 Or is it rather a country that tramples upon your rights, dis- 
 dains your cries, and insults your distresses ? Have you not 
 lately, in the meek language of humble petitioners, begged 
 from the justice of congress what you could no longer expect 
 from their favor ? How have you been answered ? Let the 
 letter which you are called to consider to-morrow make reply ! 
 
 " If this be your treatment while the swords you wear are 
 necessary for the defence of America, what have you to ex- 
 pect when those very swords, the instruments and companions 
 of your glory, shall be taken from your sides, and no mark of 
 military distinction left but your wants, infirmities, and scars? 
 If you have sense enough to discover and spirit to oppose 
 tyranny, whatever garb it may assume, awake to your situation. 
 If the present moment be lost, your threats hereafter will be 
 as empty as your entreaties now. Appeal from the justice to 
 the fears of government ; and suspect the man " — here "Wash- 
 ington was pointed at — "who would advise to longer forbear- 
 ance." * 
 
 A copy of the address reached Washington on Tuesday, the 
 eleventh, and the meeting was to take j)lace in the evening of 
 that very day. Resolutions dictated by passion and tending 
 to anarchy, if once adopted, could never be effaced, and might 
 bring ruin on the army and the nation. There was need of 
 instant action, " to arrest the feet that stood wavering on a 
 precipice." f To change ill-considered menaces into a legal 
 presentment of grievances, the commander, in general orders, 
 disapproved the anonymous and irregular invitation to a meet- 
 ing, and at the same time requested all the highest officers and 
 a representation of the rest to assemble at twelve o'clock on 
 the next Saturday to hear the report of the committee which 
 they had sent to congress. " After mature deliberation, they 
 will devise what further measures ought to be adopted to attain 
 the just and important object in view. The senior officer in 
 rank present wiU preside and report the result of their delib- 
 erations to the commander-in-chief." Gates quailed, and the 
 
 * Journal of Congress, iv., 208. 
 
 f Washington to Hamilton, 12 March 1783. Hamilton, i., 344. 
 
1783. THE AMERICAN" ARMY AND ITS CHIEF. 73 
 
 gathering for that evening was given up ; but under his eye 
 Armstrong prepared a second anonymous address, which, while 
 it professed to consider the general orders of Washington " as 
 giving stability to their resolves," recommended " suspicion " 
 as their ''sentinel." During the week, Washington employed 
 himself, with Knox and others whom he could trust, in pre- 
 paring methods to avert every fatal consequence. 
 
 At noon on the fifteenth the officers assembled, with Gates 
 in the chair. They were sui^prised to find that the commander- 
 in-chief was with them. Every eye was fixed on him ; and 
 all were mute, awaiting his words.* 
 
 After an apology to his " brother officers " for his pres- 
 ence, he read his analysis of the anonymous addresses. Their 
 author he praised for his rhetorical skill, but denied the recti- 
 tude of his heart, and denounced his scheme as fit to proceed 
 from no one but a British emissary. He thus continued : 
 
 " As I was among the first who embarked in the cause of 
 our common country ; as I have never left your side one mo- 
 ment, but when called from you on public duty ; as I have 
 been the constant companion and witness of your distresses, it 
 can scarcely be supposed that I am indifferent to your inter- 
 ests." He proceeded to demonstrate that any attempt to com- 
 pel an instant compliance with their demands would certainly 
 remove to a still greater distance the o-ttainment of their ends. 
 They must place their reliance on the plighted faith of their 
 country and the purity of the intentions of congress to render 
 them ample justice, though its deliberations, from the difficulty 
 of reconciling different interests, might be slow. 
 
 " For myself," he said, " so far as may be done consistently 
 with the great duty T owe my country and those powers we 
 are bound to respect, you may command my services to the 
 utmost extent of my abilities. 
 
 "While I give you these assurances, let me entreat you, 
 gentlemen, on your part, not to take any measures which, in 
 the calm light of reason, will lessen the dignity and sully the 
 glory you have hitherto maintained. Let me conjure you in 
 the name of our common country, as you value your own sacred 
 honor, as you respect the rights of humanity, and as you regard 
 
 * Shaw to Rev. John Eliot, 21 April 1783. 
 
74 THE CONFEDEKATION. b. i. ; on. vi, 
 
 tlie military and national character of America, to express your 
 utmost horror and detestation of the man who wickedly at- 
 tempts to open the floodgates of civil discord and deluge our 
 rising empire in blood. 
 
 '^Bj thus determining and thus acting, you will pursue 
 the plain and direct road to the attainment of your wishes ; 
 you will give one more proof of unexampled patriotism and 
 patient virtue, rising superior to the pressure of the most com- 
 plicated suiferings ; and you will afford occasion for posterity 
 to say : ' Had this day been wanting, the world had never seen 
 the last stage of perfection to which human nature is capable 
 of attaining.' " 
 
 On concluding his address, the general, in further proof of 
 the good disposition of congress, began to read parts of a let- 
 ter from a member of that body ; but, after getting through a 
 single paragraph, he paused, and asked leave of his audience to 
 put on spectacles, which he had so lately received * that he had 
 never yet worn them in public, f saying : " I have grown gray 
 in your service, and now find myself growing blind." These 
 unaffected words touched every heart. The letter, which was 
 from Joseph Jones of King George county in Virginia, set 
 forth the embarrassments of congress and their resolve that the 
 army should at all events be justly dealt with. Washington 
 then withdrew. 
 
 Officers, who a few hours before had yielded themselves to 
 the anonymous addresses, veered about, and would now follow 
 no counsellor but their own commander. The assembly unani- 
 mously thanked him for his communications and assured him 
 of their affection, " with the greatest sincerity of which the 
 human heart is capable." Then, after a reference to Knox, 
 Brooks, and Howard as their committee, they resolved unani- 
 mously : " At the commencement of the present war, the offi- 
 cers of the American army engaged in the service of their 
 country from the purest love and attachment to the rights and 
 liberties of human nature, which motives still exist in the high- 
 
 * From Rittenhouse. Waslimgtoii to Rittenhouse, 16 February 1783 ; Memoirs 
 of Puttenhouse, 299, 300. 
 
 f " C'etoit la premiere fois qu'il les prenoit en publique." Mazzei, RechercheB, 
 iv., 122. 
 
1783. THE AMERICAN ARMY AND ITS CHIEF. 75 
 
 est degree ; and no circumstances of distress or danger shall in- 
 duce a conduct that may tend to sully the reputation and glory 
 which they have acquired at the price of their blood and eight 
 years' faithful services." Making no demands and confining 
 their expectations within the most reasonable limits, they de- 
 clared their unshaken confidence in the justice of congress and 
 their country, and they asked nothing of their chief but to 
 urge congress to a speedy decision upon their late memorial. 
 
 Another resolution declared "that the officers of the 
 American army view with abhorrence and reject with disdain 
 the infamous propositions contained in a late anonymous ad- 
 dress to them." Gates meekly put the question, and was 
 obliged to report that it was carried unanimously. 
 
 'No one ever ruled the hearts of his officers like T^ashing- 
 ton. The army of America had seen him calm and command- 
 ing in the rage of battle ; patient and persistent under multi- 
 plied misfortunes ; moderate in victory ; but then he had been 
 countenanced by his troops and his friends; here he stood 
 alone, amid injured men of inflamed passions, with swords 
 at their sides, persuaded that forbearance would be their ruin, 
 and, for a fearful moment, looking upon him as their adver- 
 sary. As he spoke, every cloud was scattered, and the full 
 light of love of country broke forth. Happy for America 
 that she had a patriot army ; happy for America and for the 
 v/orld that that army had Washington for its chief ! 
 
 The official narrative of these events was received in con- 
 gress on the twenty-second, and, before the day came to an 
 end, nine states concurred in a resolution'^ commuting the 
 half-pay promised to the officers into a sum equal to five 
 years' full pay, to be discharged by certificates bearing inter- 
 est at six per cent. Georgia and Rhode Island were not ade- 
 quately represented ; l^ew Hampshire and J^ew Jersey voted 
 in the negative ; all the other states irrevocably pledged the 
 United States to redeem their promise made to the officers 
 in the dark hours of their encampment at Yalley Forge. 
 
 On the next day a ship dispatched from Cadiz by d'Es- 
 taing, at the instance of Lafayette, brought authentic news 
 that the American and British commissioners had signed defini- 
 
 * Bland to Wasliington, 22 March IVSS. MS. 
 
76 THE CONFEDERATION". b.i.;ch.vi. 
 
 lively a provisional treaty, of wliicli an official copy had been 
 received eleven days before, and that peace with Great Brit- 
 ain had already taken effect. The American boundaries on 
 the northwest exceeded alike the demands and the hopes of 
 congress, and it was already believed that a later generation 
 would make its way to the Pacific ocean.* 
 
 The glad tidings drew from "Washington tears of joy in 
 that "happiest moment of his life." "All the world is 
 touched by his republican virtues," wrote Luzerne. " It will 
 be in vain for him to wish to hide himseK and live as a sim- 
 ple, private man ; he will always be the first citizen of the 
 United States." f All the while no one like him had pursued 
 with single-mindedness and perseverance and constant activity 
 the great object of creating a republican government for the 
 continent. To Hamilton he wrote on the last day of March 
 1783 : " I rejoice most exceedingly that there is an end to our 
 warfare, and that such a field is opening to our view, as will 
 with wisdom to direct the cultivation of it, make us a great, a 
 respectable, and happy people ; but it must be improved by 
 other means than state politics, and unreasonable jealousies and 
 prejudices, or it requires not the second sight to see that we 
 shall be instruments in the hands of our enemies and those 
 European powers who may be jealous of our greatness in union, 
 to dissolve the confederation. But to obtain this, although the 
 way seems extremely plain, is not so easy. 
 
 " My wish to see the union of these states established upon 
 liberal and permanent principles, and incHnation to contribute 
 my mite in pointing out the defects of the present constitu- 
 tion, are equally great. All my private letters have teemed 
 with these sentiments, and, whenever this topic has been the 
 subject of conversation, I have endeavored to diffuse and en- 
 force them. "No man in the United States is or can be more 
 deeply impressed with the necessity of a reform in our present 
 confederation than myself. No man, perhaps, has felt the bad 
 effects of it more sensibly; for to the defects thereof, and 
 want of power in congress, may justly be ascribed the pro- 
 longation of the war and consequently the expenses occasioned 
 
 * Luzerne to Vergenncs, 19 March 1*783. MS. 
 f Luzerne to Vergennes, 29 March 1783. 
 
1783. THE AMEEICAN ARMY AND ITS CHIEF. 77 
 
 by it. More tliaii half tlie perplexities I have experienced in 
 the course of my command, and almost the whole of the dif- 
 ficulties and distress of the army, have had their origin here. 
 But still, the prejudices of some, the designs of others, and 
 the mere machinery of the majority, make address and man- 
 agement necessary to give weight to opinions which are to 
 combat the doctrines of those diiferent classes of men in the 
 field of politics." * 
 
 Upon official information from Franklin and Adams, con- 
 gress on the eleventh of April made proclamation for the ces- 
 sation of hostilities. In announcing the great event to the 
 army, Washington did especial honor to the men who had 
 enlisted for the w^r, and added : " Happy, thrice happy shall 
 they be pronounced hereafter who have contributed anything 
 in erecting this stupendous fabric of freedom and empire; 
 who have assisted in protecting the rights of human nature, 
 and establishing an asylum for the poor and oppressed of all 
 nations and religions." f The proclamation of congress that 
 war was at an end was pubHshed to the army on the nine- 
 teenth, exactly eight years from the day when the embattled 
 farmers of Concord " fired the shot heard round the world." 
 
 *Sparks'3 Washington, viii., 409, 410, 411. Washington to Hamilton, 31 
 March 1783. f Sparks, viii., 5G8. 
 
78 THE CONFEDERATION. b. i. ; oh. vii. 
 
 CHAPTER YII. 
 
 DISBANDmG THE AEMY. 
 
 Maech-July 1Y83. 
 
 Washington presented the rightful claims of the " patriot 
 army"* with a warmth and energy which never but this 
 once appear in his commimications to congress ; and his words 
 gained intenser power from his disinterestedness. To a com- 
 mittee on which were Bland and Hamilton, he enforced, by 
 every consideration of gratitude, justice, honor, and national 
 pride, the " universal " expectations of the army, that, before 
 their disbanding, they should receive pay for at least one 
 month in hand, with an absolute assurance in a short time of 
 pay for two months more. " The financier will take his own 
 measures, but this sum must be procured. The soldier is will- 
 ing to risk the hard-earned remainder due him for four, five, 
 perhaps six years upon the same basis of security with the 
 general mass of other public creditors." f 
 
 " The expectations of the army," answered Hamilton, " are 
 moderation itself." :j: But, after a week's reflection, Morris, 
 who had already written to congress " our public credit is 
 gone," * replied to the committee that the amount of three 
 months' pay was more than all the receipts from all the states 
 since 1781 ; that there was no resource but the issue of paper 
 notes in anticipation of revenue. || 
 
 * Washington to congress, 18 March 1783. Sparks, viii., 396-399. 
 f Washington to Bland, 4 April 1783. 
 
 X Hamilton to Washington, 11 April 1VS3. Letters to Washington, iv., 17. 
 
 * Diplomatic Correspondence, xii., 342. 
 
 I R. Morris to Hamilton, 14 April 1783. Diplomatic Correspondence, xii., 
 346. 
 
1783. DISBANDING THE AKMY. 79 
 
 A sharp admonition from Yergennes to tlie United States 
 speedily to meet their engagements in France and Holland,* 
 and the representations of Washington, quickened the deter- 
 mination of congress. In preparing the plan for a revenue, 
 Madison was assisted by Jefferson, who passed a large part of 
 the winter in Philadelphia. 
 
 The national debt of Great Britain at the beginning of the 
 war with America amounted to one hundred and thirty-six 
 millions of pounds ; at the close of it, inclading deficiencies 
 that were still to be funded, it amounted to twice that sum. 
 The debt of the United States did not much exceed forty-two 
 millions of dollars ; the annual interest on that debt was not 
 far from two and a half millions, and to fund it successfully 
 there was need of a yearly revenue of at least that sum. One 
 million was hoped for from specific duties on enumerated im- 
 ports, and a duty of five per cent on the value of all others. 
 A million and a half dollars more were to be raised by requisi- 
 tions of congress, apportioned on the states according to popu- 
 lation. This more convenient method had hitherto failed from 
 conflicts on the rule for counting slaves. The South had in- 
 sisted on the ratio of two for one freeman. "Williamson of 
 North Carolina said: "I am principled against slavery. I 
 think slaves an incumbrance to society instead of increasing 
 its ability to pay taxes." f To effect an agreement, Madison, 
 seconded by John Rutledge, offered that slaves should be rated 
 as five to three, and this compromise, which then affected 
 taxation only and not representation, was accepted almost with 
 unanimity. ;[: 
 
 In the beginning of April, Hamilton had declared in con- 
 gress that he wished to strengthen the federal constitution 
 through a general convention, and should soon, in pursuance 
 of instructions from his constituents, propose a plan for that 
 purpose. * In the mean time, he remained inflexible in the 
 opinion that an attempt to obtain revenue by an application^ 
 to the several states would be futile, because an agreement 
 could never be arrived at through partial deliberations. The 
 
 * Luzerne to R. Morris, 15 March ITSS. Diplomatic Correspondence, xi., 157, 
 158. f Gilpin, 423 ; Elliot, 79. 
 
 X Gilpin, 423, 424 ; Elliot, 79. * Gilpin, 429, 430; Elliot, 81. 
 
80 THE COXFEDERATIOK b. i. ; ch. vn. 
 
 vote on the report of tlie new financial measure, which he op- 
 posed as inadequate, was taken on the eighteenth of April. 
 Georgia alone was absent ; eleven states were fully represented ; 
 New Hampshire by a single delegate. Hamilton and the two 
 representatives of Ehode Island, alone and for the most oppo- 
 site reasons, gave their votes in the negative. !New York being 
 divided, nine states and a half against one, twenty-five delegates 
 against three, recorded their votes for the adoption of tlie report. 
 
 To the relentless exigencies of the moment the financial 
 proposition of the eighteenth of April offered no relief, nor 
 could it take effect until it should be accepted by every one of 
 the thirteen states. To win this unanimous assent, congress, 
 in the words of Madison, enforced the peculiar nature of their 
 obligations to France, to members of the republic of Holland, 
 and to the army. Moreover, " the citizens of the United States 
 are responsible for the greatest trust ever confided to a politi- 
 cal society. If justice, good faith, honor, gratitude, and all the 
 other qualities which ennoble the character of a nation and 
 fulfil the ends of government, be the fruits of our unadulter- 
 ated forms of republican government, the cause of liberty will 
 acquire a dignity and lustre which it has never yet enjoyed ; 
 and an example will be set which cannot but have the most 
 favorable influence on the rights of mankind." !Mew York, 
 North and South Carolina, and Massachusetts were following 
 the example of Virginia, and repealing their revenue acts of 
 former years ; when the address went forth, accompanied by 
 the letter of congress to the governor of Rhode Island which 
 Hamilton had drafted, and by various papers showing the 
 amount and the character of the debt of the United States. 
 
 Then, on the twenty-eighth, and so far as the records show 
 never tiU then, congress appointed a committee on the New 
 York resolutions of the preceding July in favor of a general 
 convention. Its choice fell on Ellsworth, Carroll, Wilson, 
 Gorham, Hamilton, Peters, McHenry, Izard, and Duane."^ 
 
 * Madison, on whom we depend for a report of the delDates of congress of that 
 period, was absent from Saturday, April the twenty-sixth, to Tuesday, May sixth. 
 So details are wanting. That Clinton's letter and the New York resolutions were 
 committed on the twenty-eighth of April, we know from a MS. memorandum by 
 Charles Thomson. 
 
1783. DISBANDING THE ARMY. 81 
 
 In October 1780, congress provided for forming new states 
 out of the nortli-western territory.* A most elaborate report, 
 read in November 1781, recommended that the lands for set- 
 tlements " should be laid out into townships of about six miles 
 square." f Early in 1783 Kufus Putnam, with other officers 
 and soldiers of the army in 'New England, engaged heartily in 
 a plan to form a state westward of the Ohio, and Timothy 
 Pickering, who had framed a complete plan for settling lands 
 in Ohio, proposed to them that " the total exclusion of slavery 
 from the state should form an essential and irrevocable part of 
 the constitution." J To " unite the thirteen states in one great 
 political interest," Bland, a man of culture, who had served 
 with credit as a colonel of dragoons, and had been a member 
 of congress from Virginia since 1780, now, on the fifth of June 
 1783, brought forward an " ordinance " to accept conditionally 
 the cession of Virginia, divide it into districts of two degrees 
 of latitude by three degrees of longitude, and subdivide each 
 district into townships of a fixed number of miles square ; each 
 district to be received into the union as a " sovereign " state, 
 so soon as it could count twenty thousand inhabitants. In 
 these embryo states, every one who had enlisted for the war or 
 had served for three years was to receive the bounty lands 
 promised him, and thirty acres more for each dollar due to 
 him from the United States. One tenth part of the soil was 
 to be reserved for " the payment of the civil list of the United 
 States, the erecting of frontier posts, and the founding of 
 seminaries of learning ; the surplus to be appropriated to the 
 building and equipping a navy, and to no other purpose what- 
 ever." This pioneer ordinance for colonizing the territory 
 north-west of the Ohio was seconded by Hamilton, and referred 
 to a grand committee.* 
 
 From the moment when it became ofiicially known that a 
 
 * Laws relating to Public Lands, 338 ; Journals of Congress, iii., 535. 
 
 f Endorsement on the original report in the state department is : " Read in 
 congress 3 November 17S1." 
 
 X Pickering's Pickering, i., 546. 
 
 ^ Papers of Old Congress, xxxvi. MS. The ordinance is in the handwriting 
 of Theodorick Bland, and indorsed by Charles Thomson : " Motion of Mr. Bland 
 seconded by Mr. Hamilton. June 5, 1783. Referred to the grand committee of 
 30 May 1'783." 
 
 VOL. VI. — 6 
 
82 TEE CONFEDERATION. b.i.;oh.vii. 
 
 preliminary treaty of peace had been concluded, Robert Morris 
 persistently demanded the immediate discharge of the army.* 
 The city of New York and the interior posts being still in 
 British hands, his importunity was resisted by Gorham and 
 Hamilton, and disapproved by the secretary of foreign affairs ; 
 but the public penury overcame all scruples. 
 
 As the time drew near for the officers to pass from military 
 service to civil life, they recalled the example of the Roman 
 Cincinnatus, and, adopting his name, formed themselves into 
 " one society of friends," to perpetuate " the spint of brotherly 
 kindness " and to help officers and their families in their times 
 of need. An immutable attachment to the rights and liberties 
 of human nature was made the law of conduct for members, 
 to whatever nation they might belong ; and those who were 
 Americans pledged to each other their " unalterable determi- 
 nation to promote and cherish union between the states." f By 
 one grave error, which called forth from many sides in Ameri- 
 ca and in Europe the severest censure, membership was made 
 hereditary in their eldest male posterity. The commander-in- 
 chief, who had no offspring, refused to separate himseK from 
 his faithful associates in the war ; but by his influence the soci- 
 ety at its first general meeting in May 1784 proposed to its 
 branches in the states to expunge from its constitution the 
 clauses which had excited alarm and just complaint. 
 
 The general order of the second day of June published the 
 resolve of congress that the men engaged for the war, with a 
 proper proportion of officers, were immediately to receive fur- 
 loughs, on the reverse of which was their discharge, to take 
 effect on the definitive treaty of peace. Washington felt the 
 keenest sensibility at their distresses ; :j: but he had exhausted 
 all his influence. The army, for three months' pay, received 
 only notes exactly " like other notes issued from the office of 
 finance." * These were nominally due in six months to the 
 bearer, with six per cent interest till paid. Their value in the 
 
 * Diary of Morris in Dip. Cor., xii., 36Y, note. f Sparks, ix., 23, note. 
 :j: Washington to Heath, 6 June 1783. Sparks, viii., 435. 
 
 * Washington to Bland, 4 April 1Y83 ; Journals of Congress, for July 9 and 
 following days, iv., 237, 238 ; Morris to congress, 18 July 1783, Dip. Cor., xii., 376, 
 880-386 and 387-389, and other letters. 
 
1783. DISBANDING THE ARMY. 83 
 
 market was two shillings or two and sixpence for tv/enty shil- 
 lings.* The veterans were enthusiasts for liberty, and there- 
 fore, with the consciousness of having done their duty to their 
 native land and to mankind, they, in perfect good order, bear- 
 ing with them their arms as memorials of their service, retired 
 to their homes "mthout a settlement of their accounts, and 
 without a farthing of money in their pockets." f 
 
 The events of the last four months called into full action 
 the powers and emotions of Washington. "State politics," 
 said he, " interfere too much with the more liberal and exten- 
 sive plan of government which wisdom and foresight would 
 dictate. The honor, power, and true interest of this country 
 must be measured by a continental scale. To form a new con- 
 stitution that will give consistency, stability, and dignity to the 
 union and sufficient powers to the great council of the nation 
 for general purposes, is a duty incumbent upon every man who 
 wishes well to his country." :j: 
 
 Lifted above himself, and borne on by the energy of his 
 belief, he in Jime addressed the whole people through a last 
 circular to the governor of every state,* for he was persuaded 
 that immediate and extreme danger overhung the life of the 
 union. " With this conviction of the importance of the pres- 
 ent crisis," such are his words, " silence in me would be a crime ; 
 I will therefore speak without disguise the language of free- 
 dom and of sincerity. Those who differ from me in poHtical 
 sentiment may remark that I am stepping out of the proper 
 line of my duty ; but the rectitude of my own heart, the part 
 I have hitherto acted, experience acquired by long and close 
 attention to the business of that country in whose service I have 
 spent the prime of my life and whose happiness will always 
 constitute my own, the ardent desire I feel of enjoying in pri- 
 vate life, after all the toils of war, the benefits of a wise and 
 liberal government, will sooner or later convince my country- 
 men that this address is the result of the purest intention." 
 
 * Felatiali V/cbster's Political E^-says, 310 ; compare 272. 
 
 f Washington to Congress, 7 and 24 June 1783. Sparks, viii., 438, 456. 
 I Washington to Lafayette, 5 April 1783. Sparks, viii., 412. 
 
 * Sparks, viii., 439. The date of the circular varies with the time of its suc- 
 cessive emission to the several states. 
 
84 THE CONFEDERATION-. b. i. ; en. vii. 
 
 Thoughtful for the defence of the republic, the retiring 
 commander-in-chief recommended " a proper peace establish- 
 ment," and an absolutely imif orm organization of the " militia 
 of the union" throughout "the continent." He pleaded for 
 complete justice to all classes of public creditors. He entreated 
 the legislature of each state to pension its disabled non-com- 
 missioned officers and privates. He enforced the duty of the 
 states, without " hesitating a single moment," to give their sanc- 
 tion to the act of congress establishing a revenue for the United 
 States, for the only alternative was a national bankruptcy. 
 " Honesty," he said, " will be found on every experiment to 
 be the best and only true policy. In what part of the con- 
 tinent shall we find any man or body of men who would not 
 blush to propose measures purposely calculated to rob the 
 soldier of his stipend, and the public creditor of his due ? " 
 
 He then proceeded to pronounce solemn judgment, and to 
 summon the people of America to fulfil their duty to Provi- 
 dence and to their fellow-men. " If a spirit of disunion, or 
 obstinacy and perverseness, should in any of the states attempt 
 to frustrate all the haj^py effects that might be expected to flow 
 from the union, that state which puts itself in opposition to the 
 aggregate wisdom of the continent will alone be responsible 
 for all the consequences.* 
 
 " The citizens of America, the sole lords and proprietors 
 of a vast tract of continent, are now acknowledged to be pos- 
 sessed of absolute freedom and independency. Here Heaven 
 has crowned all its other blessings by giving a fairer opportu- 
 nity for political happiness than any other nation has ever been 
 favored with. The rights of mankind are better understood 
 and more clearly defined than at any former period. The col- 
 lected wisdom acquired through a long succession of years is 
 laid open for our use in the establishment of our forms of 
 government. The free cultivation of letters, the unbounded 
 extension of commerce, the progressive refinement of man- 
 ners, the growing liberality of sentiment, and, above all, the 
 pure and benign light of revelation, have had a meliorating 
 influence on mankind. At this auspicious period, the United 
 States came into existence as a nation. 
 
 * Sparks, viii., 446, 447. 
 
1783. DISBANDING THE ARMY. 85 
 
 " Plappiness is ours if we seize the occasion and make it 
 our own. This is the moment to give such a tone to our fed- 
 eral government as will enable it to answer the ends of its in- 
 stitution. According to the system of policy the states shall 
 adopt at this moment, it is to be decided whether the revolu- 
 tion must ultimately be considered as a blessing or a curse ; a 
 blessing or a curse, not to the present age alone, for with our 
 fate will the destiny of unborn millions be involved. 
 
 "Essential to the existence of the United States is the 
 friendly disposition which will forget local prejudices and 
 policies, make mutual concessions to the general prosperity, 
 and, in some instances, sacrifice individual advantages to the 
 interest of the community. Liberty is the basis of the glorious 
 fabric of our independency and national character, and who- 
 ever would dare to sap the foundation, or overturn the struct- 
 ure, under whatever specious pretext he may attempt it, will 
 merit the bitterest execration and the severest punishment 
 which can be inflicted by his injured coimtry. 
 
 "It is indispensable to the happiness of the individual 
 states that there should be lodged somewhere a supreme power 
 to regulate and govern the general concerns of the confeder- 
 ated republic, without which the union cannot be of long du- 
 ration,* and everything must very rapidly tend to anarchy and 
 confusion. Whatever measures have a tendency to dissolve the 
 union, or to violate or lessen the sovereign authority, ought to 
 be considered as hostile to the liberty and independence of 
 America. It is only in our united character that we are 
 known as an empire, that our independence is acknowledged, 
 that our power can be regarded, or our credit supported among 
 foreign nations. The treaties of the European powers with 
 the United States of America will have no validity on a dis- 
 solution of the union. We shall be left nearly in a state of 
 nature ; or we may find by our own unhappy experience that 
 there is a natural and necessary progression from the extreme 
 of anarchy to the extreme of tyranny, and that arbitrary 
 power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused 
 to licentiousness." 
 
 This circular letter of Washington the governors of the 
 
 * Sparks, viii,, 444. 
 
86 THE CONFEDERATIO>T. b. i. ; en. vii. 
 
 states, according to liis request, communicated to their respect- 
 ive legislatures. In this way it was borne to every home in 
 the United States, and he entreated the people to receive it as 
 " his legacy " on his retirement to private life. 
 
 He avoided the appearance of dictating to congress how 
 the constitution should be formed ; but, while he was careful 
 to declare himself " no advocate for their having to do with 
 the particular policy of any state further than it concerns the 
 union at large," he had no reserve in avowing his " wish to see 
 energy given to the federal constitution by a convention of the 
 people." ''^ 
 
 The newspapers of the day, as they carried the letter of 
 Washington into every home, caught up the theme, and de- 
 manded a revision of the constitution, ^^ not by congress, but 
 by a continental convention, authorized for the purpose." f 
 
 * Washington to Dr. William Gordon, 8 July 1783. 
 
 f Among them: Philadelphia, 3 July 1783; Maryland Gazette, 11 July; Vir- 
 ginia Gazette, 19 July. 
 
THE 
 
 FOMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 OF THE 
 
 UI^riTED STATES OF AMEEIOA 
 
 IK FIVE BOOKS. 
 
 BOOK SECOm 
 OlSr THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION". 
 
 1783-1787. 
 
CHAPTER L 
 
 - how the land received the legacy of washington. 
 June-December 1783. 
 
 All movements conspired to form for tlie thirteen states a 
 constitution, sooner than they dared to hope and " better than 
 they knew." '^ The love of union and the resistance to the 
 claims of Great Britain were the inseparable inmates of the 
 same bosom. Brave men from different states, risking life 
 and everything valuable in a common cause, believed by all to 
 be most precious, were confirmed in the habit of considering 
 America as their country and congress as their government." ^' 
 Acting as one, they had attained independence. Moreover, it 
 was their fixed belief that they had waged battle not for them- 
 selves alone, but for the hopes and the rights of manlcind ; and 
 this faith overleapt the limits of separate commonwealths with 
 the force of a religious conviction. For eighteen years the 
 states had watched together over their liberties ; for eight they 
 had borne arms together to preserve them ; for more than two 
 they had been confederates under a compact to remain united 
 forever. 
 
 The federation excelled every one that had preceded it. 
 Inter-citizenship and mutual equahty of rights between all its 
 members gave to it a new character and an enduring unity. 
 The Hebrew commonwealth was intensely exclusive, both by 
 descent and from religion ; every Greek republic grew out of 
 families and tribes ; the word nation originally implied a com- 
 mon ancestry. All mediaeval repubHcs, like the Roman mu- 
 nicipalities, rested on privilege. The principle of inter-citi- 
 
 * Marshall in Van Smtvoord's Chief Justices of the United States, 314, 315. 
 
90 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL COXVENTIO:^'. b. ii. ; oh. i. 
 
 zenship infused itself neither into tlie constitution of the old 
 German empire, nor of Switzerland, nor of Holland. Even 
 when the American people took up arms against Great Brit- 
 ain, congress dehned only the membership ^ of each colony ; 
 the articles of confederation first brought in the rule that any 
 one might at will transfer his membership from one state to 
 another. Of old a family, a sept, a clan, a tribe, a nation, a 
 race, ow^ed its unity to consanguinity. Inter-citizenship now 
 took the place of consanguinity ; the Americans became not 
 only one people, but one nation. They had framed a union of 
 several states in one confederacy, fortified and bound in with 
 a further union of the inhabitants of every one of them by a 
 mutual and reciprocally perfect naturalization. f This inter- 
 citizenship, though only in its third year, has been so ratified 
 by national afiections, by the national acquisition of independ- 
 ence, by national treaties, by national interests, by national 
 history, that the people possessing it cannot but take one step 
 more, and from an indwelling necessity form above the states a 
 common constitution for the w^hole. 
 
 It was to a nation which had not as yet a self -existent gov- 
 ernment, and which needed and felt the need of one, that 
 Washington's legacy went forth. The love which was every- 
 where cherished for him, in itself had become a bond of union. 
 " They are compelled to await the result of his letter," re- 
 ported Luzerne ; if " they hope more from the weight of a sin- 
 gle citizen than from the authority of the sovereign body." 
 Jonathan Trumbull, the venerable governor of Connecticut, in 
 his prompt reply extolled " this last address which exhibited 
 the foundation principles " of " an indissoluble union of the 
 states under one federal head." * When in the next autumn 
 this faithful war governor, after more than fifty years of ser- 
 vice, bade farewell to public life, imitating Washington, he 
 set forth to the legislature of Connecticut, and through them 
 to its people, that the grant to the federal constitution of pow- 
 ers clearly defined, ascertained, and understood, and sufficient 
 
 * Journals of Congress, i., 365. 
 
 f Bacon's speech for general naturalization, Spedding's Bacon's Letters and 
 Life, iii., 319. if Luzerne to Vergcnnes, 4 August 1783. 
 
 * Jonathan Trumbull to Washington, 10 June 17S3. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTOIN'. 91 
 
 for all tli8 great purposes of union, could alone lead from tlie 
 danger of anarchy to national happiness and glorj. ^^ 
 
 In June the general assembly of Delaware complied with 
 all parts of the recommendation of congress, coupling the im- 
 post with the state's quota of the federal requisition.! To 
 Washington, Nicholas Van Dyl^e, the governor, on receiving 
 the circular, reported this proof of their zeal for establishing 
 the credit of the union, adding : " The state which declines a 
 similar conduct must be blind to the united interest with which 
 that of the individual states is inseparably connected." if 
 
 Pennsylvania, linking together the North and the South, 
 never hesitated ; then and ever after, it made the reasoning and 
 the hopefulness of Washington its own. At a festival in 
 Philadelphia, held near the middle of July, with Dickinson, 
 the president of the state, in the chair, the leading toast was : 
 "New strength to the union;" and, when "Honor and im- 
 mortality to the principles in Washington's circular letter " was 
 proposed, the company rose twice and manifested their appro- 
 bation by nine huzzas. 
 
 A month later, Dickinson and the council of Pennsylvania 
 sent to the general assembly the valedictory of the commander- 
 in-chief, quoting and enforcing his words, saying: "We most 
 earnestly recommend that the confederation be strengthened 
 and improved. To advance the dignity of the union is the 
 best way to advance the interest of each state. A federal su- 
 premacy, with a competent national revenue, to govern iirmly 
 general and relative concerns," can alone " ensure the respect, 
 tranquillity, and safety, that are naturally attached to an exten- 
 sive and well-established empire. All the authorities before 
 mentioned may be vested in a federal council, not only with- 
 out the least danger to liberty, but liberty will be thereby 
 better secured."*^ The house on the twenty-fifth, joining 
 together the impost and the quota of the state, unanimously 
 ordered the grant of them both,|| and at a later session thanked 
 Washington specially for his final "circular letter, the ines- 
 timable legacy bequeathed to his country." 
 
 * Stuart's Trumbull, G04-G08. | Tapcrg of Old Congress, Ixxr. MS. 
 X Nicholas Van Dyke to Washington, 2 July 1783. 
 
 * Colonial Records, xiii., 648, G49. |1 Papers of Old Congress, Ixxv. MS. 
 
92 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; oh.l 
 
 In March, during a session of the legislature of South 
 Carolina, Greene, who had received the suggestions of Gouv- 
 emeur Morris, addressed a letter to the state through Guerard, 
 the governor, representing the sufferings and mutinous temper 
 of the army, and the need of a revenue for congress, and say- 
 ing : " Independence can only prove a blessing under congres- 
 sional influence. More is to be dreaded from the members of 
 congress exercising too little than too much power. The finan- 
 cier says his department is on the brink of ruin. To the north- 
 ward, to the southward, the eyes of the army are turned upon the 
 states, whose measures will determine their conduct. They will 
 not be satisfied -svith general promises ; nothing short of perma- 
 nent and certain revenue will keep them subject to authority." 
 
 " 'No dictation by a Cromwell ! " cried impatient members 
 who could scarcely wait to hear the conclusion of the letter. 
 To mark independence of congress and resistance to the requi- 
 sitions of " its swordsmen," South CaroHna revoked its grant 
 to the United States of power to levy a five per cent duty 
 on imports.* Greene consoled himself with the thought that 
 " he had done his duty, and would await events ; " but he 
 was made wiser by the rebuff. While he perceived that with- 
 out more effectual support the power of congress must expire, 
 he saw that the movement of soldiers without civil authority 
 is pregnant with danger, and would naturally fall under the 
 " direction of the Clodiuses and Catilines in America." f The 
 appeal of congress in April exercised little counteracting in- 
 fluence; but, when the circular of Washington arrived, the 
 force and affection with which it was written produced an 
 alteration of sentiment in more than one quarter of the mem- 
 bers. " Washington was admired before ; now he vs^as little 
 less than adored." J The continental impost act was adopted, 
 though not without a clause reserving the collection of the 
 duties to the officers of the state, and appropriating them to 
 the payment of the federal quota of South Carolina.* 
 
 * Johnson's Life of Greene, ii., 387, 888. 
 
 f Greene to G. Morris, 3 April 1783. Sparks' Life of G. Morris, i., 251, 
 252. 
 
 :j: Greene to Washington, 8 August 1783. Letters to "Washington, iv., 38. 
 
 * Statute No. 1,190, passed 13 August 1783, in Statutes at Large of South 
 Carolina, iv., 570. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. 93 
 
 In October, Clinton, the governor of New York, responded 
 to WasHngton : " Unless tlie powers of the national council 
 are enlarged, and that body better supported than at present, 
 all its measures will discover such feebleness and want of 
 energy as will stain us with disgrace and expose us to the worst 
 of evils." * And in the following January, holding up to 
 the legislature the last circular of the commander-in-chief, he 
 charged them to " be attentive to every measure which has a 
 tendency to cement the union and to give to the national 
 councils that energy which may be necessary for the general 
 welfare." f 
 
 The circular reached Massachusetts just when the legisla- 
 ture was complaining of the half-pay and of excessively large 
 salaries to civil officers. The senate and the house dispatched 
 a most affectionate joint address to "Washington, attributing to 
 the guidance of an all-wise Providence his selection as com- 
 mander-in-chief, adding: "While patriots shall not cease to 
 applaud your sacred attachment to the rights of citizens, your 
 military virtue and achievements will make the brightest pages 
 in the history of mankind." J To congress the legislature 
 gave assurances that ^4t could not without horror entertain the 
 most distant idea of the dissolution of the union ; " though 
 "the extraordinary grants of congress to civil and military 
 officers had produced in the commonwealth effects of a threat- 
 ening aspect." * John Hancock, the popular governor, com- 
 mending Washington's circular, looked to him as the states- 
 man " of wisdom and experience," teaching them how to im- 
 prove to the happiest purposes the advantages gained by arms. 
 
 As president of the senate, Samuel Adams officially signed 
 the remonstrance of Massachusetts against half -pay ; as a citi- 
 zen, he frankly and boldly, in his own state and in Connecti- 
 cut, defended the advice of Washington: "In resisting en- 
 croachments on our rights, an army became necessary. Con- 
 gress were and ought to be the sole judge of the means of 
 supporting that army ; they had an undoubted right in the 
 very nature of their appointment to make the grant of haK 
 
 * Clinton to Washington, 14 October 1*783. Letters to Washington, iv., 48. 
 
 f Speech to the legislature, 21 January 1784. 
 
 X Boston Gazette, 22 August 1783. « Journals of Congress, iv., 27G 
 
94 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; ch. i. 
 
 pay ; and, as it was made in belialf of the United States, each 
 state is bound in justice to comply with it, even though it 
 should seem to them to have been an ill-judged measure. 
 States as well as individual persons are equally bound to fulfil 
 their engagements, and it is one part of the description given 
 to us in the sacred scriptures of an honest man, that, though 
 * he sweareth to his own hurt, he changeth not.' " * 
 
 In like spirit congress replied to the protest against half- 
 pay. " The measure was the result of a deliberate judgment 
 framed on a general view of the interests of the union, and 
 pledged the national faith to carry it into effect. If a state 
 every way so important as Massachusetts should withhold her 
 solid support to constitutional measures of the confederacy, the 
 result must be a dissolution of the union ; and then she must 
 hold herself as alone responsible for the anarchy and domestic 
 confusion that may succeed." f 
 
 At the opening of the autumn session, Hancock, recalling 
 the attention of the legislature to the words of Washington, 
 said : '' How to strengthen and improve this union, so as to 
 render it more completely adequate, demands the immediate 
 attention of these states. Our very existence as a free nation 
 is suspended upon it." :j: 
 
 On the ninth of October he cited to the general court ex- 
 tracts of letters from John Adams confirming the sentiments 
 of Washington. J^ear forty towns in the state had instructed 
 their representatives against granting the impost recommended 
 by congress. And yet it was carried in the house by seventy- 
 two against sixty-five ; a proviso that it should not be used to 
 discharge half -pay or its commutation was rejected by a ma- 
 jority of ten ; and the bill passed the senate almost unani- 
 mously.'* Some of the towns still murmured, but Boston in 
 
 * Samuel Adams to a friend in Connecticut. Boston, 25 September 1*783. 
 Same to Noah Webster, 30 April 1V84. MS. 
 
 f Journals of Congress, iv,, 277, 278. Congress, on which "Washington was 
 then in attendance, would surely have consulted him on the half-pay of which he 
 was the author. The original papers prove that the congressional reply to Massa- 
 chusetts was prepared after much consultation, and here and there show traces 
 of his mind. j;. Salem Gazette of 2 October 1783. 
 
 * Samuel Cooper to Franklin, 16 October 1783. Works of Franklin, x., 25. 
 Salem Gazette, 30 October 1783. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. 95 
 
 town-meeting answered : *^ The commutation is wisely blended 
 with the national debt. With respect to the impost, if we 
 ever mean to be a nation, we must give power to congress, 
 and funds, too." 
 
 But AYashington's letter achieved its greatest victory in his 
 own state. Mercer had said in congress that, sooner than re- 
 instate the impost, he would " crawl to Kichmond on his bare 
 knees." * The legislature, which was in session when the com- 
 munication from congress arrived, ordered a bill to grant the 
 impost. Jefferson was hoping that Henry would speak for the 
 grant, but he remained mute in his place, j- Richard Henry 
 Lee and Thurston spoke of congress as " lusting for power." 
 The extent of the implied powers which Hamilton had as- 
 serted in the letter of congress to Rhode Island was " repro- 
 bated as alarming and of dangerous tendency ; " :j: and on the 
 eleventh of June the proposition of congress was pronounced 
 to be inadmissible, because the revenue-officers were not to be 
 amenable to the commonwealth ; because the power of collect- 
 ing a revenue by penal laws could not be delegated without 
 danger ; and because the moneys to be raised from citizens of 
 Yirginia were to go into the general treasury. So the propo- 
 sition of congress was left without any support. Yirginia, to 
 discharge her continental debt, preferred to establish a custom- 
 house of her o^vn, appropriating its income to congress for 
 five-and-twenty years, and making good the deficiency by taxes 
 on land, negroes, and polls. "The state," said Arthur Lee, 
 " is resolved not to suffer the exercise of any foreign power 
 or influence within it." * But, when the words of Washington 
 were read, the house gave leave to the advocates for a conti- 
 nental impost to provide for it by a bill which v/as to have its 
 first reading at the opening of the next session. 
 
 These events did but render Richard Henry Lee more ob- 
 durate. Placing himself directly in the way of Washington 
 and Madison, he wrote to a friend at the North : " The late 
 
 * Jladison to Randolph, 18 February 1783. Gilpin, 506. 
 f Jefferson to Madison, 7 May, 1 Juno, 17 June 1783. 
 
 :}: Joseph Jones of King George to Madison, 14 June 1783, MS. ; in part in 
 Kivcs's Madison, i., 436. 
 
 * Arthur Lee to Thcodorick Bland, 13 June 1783. Bland Papers, ii., 110. 
 
96 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION", b. ii. ; ch. i. 
 
 address of congress to the states on the impost I think a too 
 early and too strong attempt to overleap those fences estab- 
 lished by the confederation to secure the liberties of the re- 
 spective states. Give the purse to an aristocratic assembly, the 
 sword will follow, and liberty become an empty name. As 
 for increasing the power of congress, I would answer as the 
 discerning men of old, with the change of a word only : ^ ]N"o- 
 lumus leges confederationis mutari — we forbid change in the 
 laws of the confederation.' " ^ But, in the time afforded for 
 reflection, Washington's valedictory letter, which Jefferson de- 
 scribes as " deservedly applauded by the world," f gained more 
 and more power ; at the adjourned session, the legislature of 
 Virginia, with absolute unanimity, reversed its decision and 
 granted by law the continental impost, if " Everything will 
 come right at last," said Washington, as he heard the gladden- 
 ing news.* 
 
 "ISTever," said George Mason, "have I heard one single 
 man deny the necessity and propriety of the union. 'No ob- 
 ject can be lost when the mind of every man in the country 
 is strongly attached to it." || " I do not believe," witnesses 
 Jefferson, " there has ever been a moment when a single whig 
 in any one state would not have shuddered at the very idea of 
 a separation of their state from the confederacy." '^ A propo- 
 sition had been made in June to revoke the release to the 
 United States of the territory north-west of the river Ohio. 
 Patrick Henry was for bounding the state reasonably enough, 
 but, instead of ceding the parts lopped off, he was for forming 
 them into small republics () under the direction of Yirginia. 
 I^evertheless, the legislature, guided by the sincerity and per- 
 severance of Joseph Jones of King George county, conformed 
 to the wishes of congress, and, on the nineteenth and twentieth 
 of December, cheerfully amended and confirmed their former 
 cession. J 
 
 The last legislature to address Washington in his j)iiblic 
 
 * R. n. Lee to William AYhipple, 1 July llSS, f Jefferson's Works, ix., 266. 
 
 :j: Hening, xi., 313. * Sparks, ix., 5. 
 
 I George Mason in the Virginia Convention, 11 June 1788. 
 
 ^ Jefferson, ix., 251. ^ Jefferson to ^^ladison, 11 June 1783. 
 
 4; Journals of House of Delegates, 71, 79. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. 97 
 
 character was Maryland, and thej said : " By your letter you 
 have taught us how to value, preserve, and improve that 
 liberty which your services under the smiles of Providence 
 have secured. If the powers given to congress by the con- 
 federation should be found incompetent to the purposes of the 
 union, our constituents will readily consent to enlarge them."'^ 
 
 On the part of congress, its president, Elias Eoudinot of 
 New Jersey, transmitted to the ministers of America in Europe 
 the circular letter of Washington as the most perfect evidence 
 of " his inimitable character." f 
 
 Before the end of June, raw recruits of the Pennsylvania 
 line, in the barracks at Philadelphia, many of them foreign 
 born, joined by others from Lancaster, :[: " soldiers of a day, who 
 could have very few hardships to complain of," * with some 
 returning veterans whom they forced into their ranks, | en- 
 couraged by no officer of note, "^ surrounding congress ^ and 
 the council of Pennsylvania, mutinously presented to them 
 demands for pay. Congress insisted with the state authorities 
 that the militia should be called out to restore order, and, the 
 request being refused, J it adjourned to Princeton. On the 
 rumor that the commander-in-chief was sending troops to quell 
 the mutiny, the insurgents, about three hundred in number, 
 made their submission to the president of the state. ^ 
 
 The incident hastened the selection of a place for the per- 
 manent residence of congress. The articles of confederation 
 left congress free to meet where it would. With the knowl- 
 edge of the treaty of peace, the idea naturally arose of a fede- 
 ral town, and for its site there were many competitors. Of 
 the thirteen states which at that time fringed the Atlantic, the 
 central point was in Maryland or Yirginia. In March 1783, 
 ISTew York tendered Kingston ; in May, Maryland urged the 
 choice of Annapolis ; in June, New Jersey offered a district 
 below the falls of the Delaware. Yirginia, having George- 
 
 * Address of the Maryland legislature, 22 December 1'783. MS. 
 f Diplomatic Correspondence, IVSS-IYSO, i., 14. 
 
 X Ibid., i., 9. * Sparks, viii., 455. 
 
 I Diplomatic Correspondence, 1783-1789, i., 10, 22, 23; Hamilton, i., 387. 
 ^ Diplomatic Correspondence, ii., 514 ; i., 37, 50. 
 
 ^ Gilpin, 548 ; Colonial Records, xiii., 655. ^ Hamilton, ii., 276. 
 
 ^ Diplomatic Correspondence, i., 12. 
 TOL. TI. — 7 
 
98 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; oh. i. 
 
 town for its object,* invited Maryland to join in a cession of 
 equal portions of territory lying together on the Potomac; 
 leaving congress to fix its residence on either side, f 
 
 During the summer, congress appointed a committee to 
 consider what jurisdiction it should exercise in its abiding- 
 place. Madison took counsel witli Randolph, and especially 
 with Jefferson ; J and in September the committee of which 
 he was a member reported that the state ceding the territory 
 must give up all jurisdiction over it ; the inhabitants were to 
 be assured of a government of laws made by representatives of 
 their own election.* In October, congress took up the ques- 
 tion of its permanent residence. || Gerry struggled hard for 
 the district on the Potomac ; but, by the vote of Delaware and 
 all the northern states, "a place on the Delaware near the 
 falls " was selected. Within a few days the fear of an over- 
 powering influence of the middle states led to what was called 
 "the happy coalition ;" on the seventeenth Gerry insisted that 
 the alternate residence of congress in two places would secure 
 the mutual confidence and affections of the states and preserve 
 the federal balance of power. After a debate of several days, 
 'New England, with Maryland, Virginia, and the two Carolinas, 
 decided that congress should reside for equal periods on the 
 Delaware and near the lower falls of the Potomac. Till build- 
 ings for its use should be erected, it was to meet alternately in 
 Annapolis and Trenton."^ To carry out the engagement, a 
 committee, of which James Monroe was a member, made an 
 excursion from Annapolis in the following May to view the 
 country round Georgetown ; and they reported in favor of the 
 position on which the city of Washington now stands. () 
 
 The farewell circular letter of Washington addressed to all 
 Ills countrymen had attracted the attention of congress, and 
 in particular of Hamilton, who roused himself from his own 
 
 * Madison to Randolph, 13 October 1VS3. Gilpin, 578. 
 f Journals of the Virginia House of Dslep;ate3, 23 June 17S3, p. 97. 
 t Madison to Jefferson, 20 September 17S3. Gilpin, 573. 
 ** Gilpin, 559, 571-575. 
 
 I Madison to Randolph, 13 October 17S3. Gilpin, 57G. 
 
 ^ Iligginson to Bland, January 1784. Bland Papers, ii., 113, 114. Compare 
 Boudinot to R. R. Livingston, 23 October 1783. 
 ^ Monroe to Jefferson, 20 May and 25 May 1784. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTOK 99 
 
 desponding mood wlien lie saw the great chieftain go forth 
 alone to combat " the epidemic phrenzy " * of the supreme 
 sovereignty of the separate states. During the time of dis- 
 turbances in the army, " could force have availed, he had 
 almost wished to see it employed." f Knowing nothing before- 
 hand of Washington's intention to address the people, he had 
 favored some combined action of congress and the general to 
 compel the states forthwith to choose between national anarchy 
 and a consolidated union.:]: ISTo sooner had congress established 
 itself in Princeton* than the youthful statesman drafted a 
 most elaborate and comprehensive series of resolutions embody- 
 ing in clear and definite language the defects in the confedera- 
 tion as a form of federal government; and closing with an 
 earnest recommendation to the several states to appoint a con- 
 vention to meet at a fixed time and place, w^ith full powers to 
 revise the confederation, and adopt and propose such altera- 
 tions as to them should appear necessary; to be finally ap- 
 proved or rejected by the states respectively. 
 
 But in the congress of that day he found httle disposition 
 to second an immediate effort for a new constitution. Of the 
 committee elected on the twenty- eighth of April, which 
 counted among its members the great names of Ellsworth, 
 Wilson, and Hamilton, Wilson and two others had gone home ; 
 Ellsworth followed in the first half of July, but not till he had 
 announced to the governor of Connecticut : " It will soon be 
 of very little consequence where congress go, if they are not 
 made respectable as well as responsible ; which can never be 
 done without giving them a power to perform engagements as 
 well as make them. / There must be a revenue somehow estab- 
 lished that can be relied on and applied for national purposes, 
 independent of the will of a single state, or it will be impossi- 
 ble to support national faith, or national existence. \ The 
 powers of congress must be adequate to the purposes of their 
 constitution. It is possible there may be abuses and misappli- 
 cations ; still it is better to hazard something than to hazard 
 
 * Hamilton, i., 403. f Ibid., i., 352. t I^i^^M i-, 402. 
 
 * Hamilton's endorsement on his own paper is : *' Resolutions intended to bo 
 submitted to congress at Princeton in 1783, but abandoned for want of support." 
 MS. 
 
100 OIT THE WAY TO A FEDEKAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; en. i. 
 
 all." ^^ ISTearl J at the same moment Hamilton wrote to 
 Greene : " There is so little disposition, either in or ont of con- 
 gress, to give solidity to onr national system, that there is no 
 motive to a man to lose his time in the public service who has 
 no other view than to promote its welfare. Experience must 
 convince us that our present establishments are Utopian before 
 we shall be ready to part with them for better." To Jay his 
 words were : " It is to be hoped that, when prejudice and folly 
 have run themselves out of breath, we may return to reason 
 and correct our errors." f Confirmed in " his ill forebodings 
 as to the future system of the country," :[: " he abandoned his 
 resolutions for the want of support." 
 
 In congress, which he left near the end of July, three 
 months before the period for which he was chosen expired, we 
 know through an ardent friend that " his homilies were recol- 
 lected with pleasure ; " that his extreme zeal made impressions 
 in favor of his integrity, honor, and republican principles ; that 
 he had displayed various knowledge, had been sometimes in- 
 temperate and sometimes, though rarely, visionary ; that cau- 
 tious statesmen thought, if he could pursue an object with as 
 much cold perseverance as he could defend it with ardor and 
 argument, he would prove irresistible.* From the goodness of 
 his heart, his pride, and his sense of duty, he gave up " future 
 views of public life," || to toil for the support of his wife and 
 children in a profession of which to him the labors were alike 
 engrossing and irksome.''" In four successive years, vdth few 
 to heed him, he had written and spoken for a constituent 
 federal convention. His last ofiicial word to Clinton was : 
 " Strengthen the confederation." ^ 
 
 On the second of September, more than a month after 
 Hamilton had withdrawn, the remnant of the committee of 
 the twenty-eighth of April, increased by Samuel Huntington, 
 of Connecticut, reported that " until the effect of the resolu- 
 
 * Ellsworth, infra, 824. f Johnson, ii., 442. Jay's Jay, ii., 123. 
 X Hamilton, !., 352. 
 
 * McHenry to Hamilton, 22 October ITSS. Hamilton, i., 411. 
 II Hamilton to Clinton, 14 May 1783. Hamilton, i., 368. 
 
 ^ That Hamilton disliked the labors of a lawyer, I received from Eliphalet 
 Nott. 
 
 ^ Hamilton to Clinton, 3 October 1783. Hamilton, i,, 407. 
 
1783. XnE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. IQl 
 
 ticn of congress, of April last, relating to revenue, should be 
 known, it would be proper to postpone the further considera- 
 tion of the concurrent resolutions of the senate and assembly 
 of JSTew York." '^' In this way the first proposition by a state 
 for reforming the government through a federal convention 
 was put to sleep. 
 
 All this while the British commander was preparing for 
 the evacuation of New York. The malignant cruelty of royal- 
 ists, especially in New York and South Carolina, who prompted 
 and loved to execute the ruthless orders of Germain, aroused 
 against them, as had been foretold, a just indignation, which 
 unhappily extended to thousands of families in the United 
 States who had taken no part in the excesses. Toward these 
 "Washington and Adams, Jay and Hamilton, and Jejfferson 
 who was especially called " their protector and support," f and 
 many of the best counselled forbearance and forgiveness. Mo- 
 tives of policy urged their absorption into the population of 
 the union now that the sovereign to whom they had continued 
 their allegiance had given them their release. But a dread of 
 their political influence prevailed, and before the end of 1783 
 thousands of loyalists, famiKes of superior culture, like the 
 original planters of Massachusetts, were driven to seek homes 
 in the wilds of Nova Scotia. :j: In this way the United States 
 out of their own children built up on their border a colony of 
 rivals in navigation and the fishery whose loyalty to the British 
 cro^vn was sanctified by misfortunes. Nor did the British 
 parliament hesitate for a moment to compensate all refugees 
 for the confiscation of their property, and, when the amount 
 was ascertained, it voted them from the British treasury as an 
 indemnity very nearly fifteen and a half millions of dollars.* 
 
 The American army being nearly disbanded, Washington, 
 on the eighteenth of July, with Governor Clinton as his com- 
 panion, made an excursion into the interior, during which he 
 personally examined the lines of water communication between 
 branches of the Hudson and the Saint Lawrence, the lakes and 
 the Susquehanna. By these observations, he comprehended 
 
 * Report cf Peters, Mcncnr}', Iz:ird, Duane, and S. Huntingdon, of 2 Septem- 
 ber 1 783. f Luzerne to Rayneval, of IS June 1784. MS. 
 :}: Ilaliburton's Nova ScoLia, i., 263. * Sabine's Loyalists, 111. 
 
102 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; en. i. 
 
 more clearly "the imraense extent and importance of tlie 
 inland navigation of the United States. I shall not rest con- 
 tented," said he, "till I have explored the western country 
 and traversed great part of those lines which give bounds to a 
 new empire." * 
 
 He wished at that time to visit the I^iagara ; but over the 
 fort on the American side of that river the British flag still 
 waved. Thrice Washington had invited the attention of con- 
 gress to the western posts ; and he was now inctructed to 
 demand them. He accordingly accredited Steuben to Haldi- 
 mand, the British commander-in chief in Canada, with power 
 to receive them. At Sorel, on the eighth of August, Steuben 
 explained his mission to Haldimand, who answered that he 
 had not received any orders for making the least arrangements 
 for the evacuation of a single post; and without positive 
 orders he would not evacuate one inch of ground, f Nor 
 would he permit Steuben to communicate with the inhabitants 
 of any place occupied by the British. 
 
 On the seventh of August, just as Washington had re- 
 turned from his northern tour, congress, ten states being pres- 
 ent, unanimously voted him a statue of bronze, to be executed 
 hj the best artist of Europe, j;. On the marble pedestal were 
 to be represented, in low relief, the evacuation of Boston, the 
 capture of Hessians at Trenton, the victory at Princeton, the 
 action at Monmouth, and the surrender of Cornwallis at York- 
 town. "The statue," wrote Luzerne, "is the only mark of 
 public gratitude which Washington can accept, and the only 
 one which the government in its poverty can offer." * 
 
 But a greater honor awaited him. At the request of con- 
 gress, he removed his quarters to the neighborhood of Prince- 
 ton ; and on the twenty-sixth, in a public audience, Boudinot, 
 the president, said to him : " In other nations many have de- 
 served and received the thanks of the public ; but to you, sir, 
 peculiar praise is due; your services have been essential in 
 
 * Washington to Chastellux, 12 October 1783. Sparks, viii., 489. 
 
 f Baron Steuben to Washington, 23 August 1783. Letters to Washington, 
 iv., 41, 42. 
 
 X Journals of Congress, iv.^ 251. It still remains to give effect to the vote. 
 
 * Luzerne to Vergeanes, 25 August 1783. MS. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. 103 
 
 acquiring and establishing the freedom and independence of 
 your country. It still needs your services in forming arrange- 
 ments for the time of peace." A committee was charged to 
 receive his assistance in preparing and directing the necessary 
 plans.'"* 
 
 The choice of Wasliington for a counsellor proved the sin- 
 cerity of congress in favor of union, and a series of national 
 measures was inaugurated. For a peace establishment, he ma- 
 tured a system which was capable of a gradual development. 
 He would have a regular and standing force of twenty-six hun- 
 dred and thh'ty-one men, to be employed chiefly in garrison- 
 ing the frontier posts. Light troops he specially recommended 
 as suited to the genius of the people. The people in all the 
 states were to be organized and trained in arms as one grand 
 national militia. He proposed a military academy like the 
 Prussian schools, of which he had learned the character from 
 Steuben. Yacancies in the class of ofiicers were to be iilled 
 from its graduates ; but promotions were not to depend on 
 seniority alone. For the materials essential to war, there were 
 to be not only national arsenals but national manufactories. 
 The protection of foreign commerce would require a navy. 
 All branches in the service were to look exclusively to con- 
 gress for their orders and their pay. A penniless treasury, 
 which congress knew not how to fill, made the scheme for the 
 moment an ideal one. 
 
 To regulate intercourse with the tribes of Indians, Wash- 
 ington laid down the outlines of a system. Outside of the 
 limits of the states no purchase of their lands was to be made, 
 but by the United States as '^ the sovereign power." All trad- 
 ers with them were to be under strict control. He penetrated 
 the sinister design of the British government to hold the west- 
 ern posts, and recommended friendly attention to the French 
 and other settlers at Detroit and elsewhere in the western terri- 
 tory. Looking to " the formation of new states," he sketched 
 the boundaries of Ohio and of Michigan, and, on his advice,t 
 congress in October resolved on appointing a committee to re- 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv., 256. 
 
 f Washington to Duanc, Y September 1783. Sparks, viii., 477. Secret Jour- 
 nals of Congress, i., 255-260. 
 
104 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CON-YENTION. b.ii.; en. i. 
 
 port a plan of a temporary government for the western terri- 
 tory whose inhabitants were one day to be received into the 
 nnion under republican constitutions of their own choice. 
 Here the greatness of the intention was not impaired by the 
 public penury, for the work was to be executed by the emi- 
 grants themselves. In anticipation of an acceptable cession of 
 the noi-th- western lands by all the claimant states, officers and 
 soldiers who had a right to bounty lands began to gain the 
 "West by way of the lakes or across the mountains.* This was 
 the movement toward union which nothing could repress or 
 weaken. Especially Maryland insisted that " the sovereignty 
 over the western territory was vested in the United States as 
 one undivided and independent nation." f 
 
 Among his latest official acts, Washington interceded with 
 congress on behalf of Kosciuszko, pleading for him '' his merit 
 and services from the concurrent testimony of all who knew 
 him ; " and congress accordingly granted the Polish exile who 
 was to become dear to many nations the brevet commission of 
 brigadier-general. J 
 
 The last days of this congress were cheered by the arrival 
 of Yan Berckel as envoy from the Dutch republic, the first 
 minister accredited to America since the peace.* An escort 
 was sent out to meet him, and on the thirty-first of October, in 
 a public audience, congress gave him a national welcome. 
 
 On the first of N"ovember the third congress under the con- 
 federation came together for the last time. It made persistent 
 attempts to invigorate the union ; declared the inviolable sanc- 
 tity of the national debt ; asked of the states a general revenue ; 
 prepared for planting new states in the continental domain ; 
 and extended diplomatic relations. Its demand of powers of 
 government did not reach far enough, but it kept alive the de- 
 sire of reform. It appointed a day of public thanksgiving, that 
 " all the people might assemble to give praise to their Supreme 
 Benefactor for the freedom, sovereignty, and independence of 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv,, 29-4-296. 
 
 f Journals of Congress, iv., 265. In the original MS. the word " one " is twice 
 underscored. 
 
 X Washington to Congress, 2 October 1788. Sparks, viii., 487. 
 
 * Van Bcrckcl to the states creneral, 3 November 1783. MS. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. 105 
 
 tlie United States ; " and, as the day came, tlie pulpit echoed 
 the prayer : " May all the states be one." '^* 
 
 The principle of rotation drove Madison from the national 
 conncils. He was unmarried and above care ; and, until he 
 should again be eligible to congress, he devoted himself to the 
 ctudy of federal government and to public service in the leg- 
 islature of his own state, where with strong convictions and 
 unselfish patriotism he wrought with single-minded ness to 
 bring about an efficient form of republican government. 
 He was calm, wakeful, and cautious, pursuing v/ith patience 
 his one great object, never missing an opportunity to ad- 
 vance it, caring not overmuch for conspicuousness or fame, 
 and ever ready to efface himself if he could but accomplish 
 his design. 
 
 On Sunday, the second of ISTovember, the day before the 
 discharge of all persons enlisted for the war, the commander- 
 in-chief addressed the armies of the United States, however 
 widely their members might be dispersed. Mingling affection- 
 ate thanks with praise, he described their unparalleled j)erse- 
 verance for eiglit long years as little short of a standing mira- 
 cle, and for their solace bade them call to recollection the 
 astonishing events in which they had taken part, the enlarged 
 prospects of happiness which they had assisted to open for the 
 human race. He encouraged them as citizens to renew their 
 old occupations ; and, to those hardy soldiers who were fond of 
 domestic enjoyment and personal independence, he pointed to 
 the fertile regions beyond the AUeghanies as the most happy 
 asylum. In the moment of parting, he held up as an examjDle 
 to the country the harmony which had prevailed in the camp, 
 where men from different parts of the continent and of the 
 most violent local prejudices instantly became but one patriotic 
 band of brothers. " Although the general," these are the words 
 of his last order, " has so frequently given it as his opinion in 
 the most public and explicit manner, that, unless the principles 
 of the federal government were properly supported, and the 
 powers of the union increased, the honor, dignity, and justice 
 of the nation would be lost forever, yet he cannot help leaving 
 it as his last injunction to every officer and every soldier to add 
 
 * John Murray's thanksgiving sermon, Tyranny's grove destroyed, p. 71. 
 
108 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERxiL CONVENTION, e. ii. ; on. i. 
 
 Ills best endeavors tov/ard e:aectmg these great purposes." * 
 Wasliington sent forth, every one of his fellow-soldiers as an 
 r.postle of union under a new constitution. 
 
 Almost all the Germans who had been prisoners preferred 
 to abide in the United States, where they soon became useful 
 citizens. The remnant of the British army had crossed to 
 Staten Island and Long Island for embarkation, when, on the 
 twenty-Jifth of November, Washington and the governor and 
 other officers of the state and city of ISTew York were met at 
 the Bowery by Knox and citizens, and in orderly procession 
 made their glad progress into the heart of the town. Rejoic- 
 ings followed. The emblem chosen to introduce the evening 
 display' of fireworks was a dove descending with the ohve- 
 branch. 
 
 For their farewell to "Washington, the officers of the army, 
 on the fourth of December, met at a public-house near the 
 Battery, and were soon joined by their commander. The 
 thoughts of the eight years which they had passed together, 
 their common distresses, their victories, and now their parting 
 from the 'public service, the future of themselves and of their 
 country, came thronging to every mind. JNo relation of friend- 
 ship is stronger or more tender than that between men who 
 have shared together the perils of war in a noble and upright 
 cause. The officers could attest that the courage which is the 
 most perfect and the most rare, the courage which determines 
 the man, without the least hesitation, to hold his life of less 
 account than the success of the cause for which he contends, 
 was the habit of Washington. Pledo^ing: them in a p^lass of 
 wine, he thus addressed them: ^'With a heart full of love 
 and gratitude, I now take leave of you. May your latter days 
 be as prosperous and happy as your former ones have been 
 glorious. I shall be obliged to you if each of you will come 
 and take me by the hand." With tears on his cheeks, he 
 grasped the hand of Knox, who stood nearest, and embraced 
 him. In the same manner he took leave of every officer. Fol- 
 lowed by the company in a silent procession, he passed through 
 a corps of light infantry to the ferry at Whitehall. Entering 
 
 * FarevrcU address to the armies of the United States. Rocky Hill, near 
 Princeton, 2 November 1'733. Sparks, viii., 496. 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. 107 
 
 his barge, lie Avaved liis liat to tliem ; with the eame silence 
 they returned that last voiceless farewell, and the boat pushed 
 across the Hudson. A father parting from his childron could 
 not excite more regret nor draw more tears."-^ 
 
 On his way through E"ew Jersey the chief was received 
 with the tenderest respect and affection by all classes of men. 
 The roads were covered with people who came from all quar- 
 ters to see him, to get near to him, to speak to him. Alone 
 and ready to lay down in the hands of congress the command 
 which had been confided to him, he appeared even greater than 
 when he was at the head of the armies of the United States. 
 The inhabitants of Philadelphia knew that ho was drav/ing 
 near, and, without other notice, an innumerable crowd placed 
 themselves along the road where he was to pass. Women, aged 
 men, left their houses to see him. Children passed among the 
 horses to touch his garments. Acclamations of joy and grati- 
 tude accompanied him in all the streets. Never was hom- 
 age more spontaneous or more pure. The general enjoyed 
 the scene, and owned himself by this moment repaid for eight 
 years of toils and wants and tribulations. f 
 
 At Philadelphia he put into the hands of the comptroller 
 his accounts to the thirteenth of December 1783, all written 
 with minute exactness by his o^vn hand, and accompanied by 
 vouchers conveniently arranged. Every debit against him v/as 
 credited ; but, as he had not always made an entry of moneys 
 of his own expended in the public service, he was, and chose 
 to remain, a considerable loser. To the last he refused all 
 compensation and all indemnity, though his resources had been 
 greatly diminished by the war. 
 
 On the twenty-third of December, at noon, congress in 
 Annapolis received the commander-in-chief. Its members, 
 when seated, wore their hats, as a sign that they represented 
 the sovereignty of the union. Places were assigned to the 
 governor, council, and legislature of Maryland, to general offi- 
 cers, and to the representative of France. Spectators filled, 
 the gallery and crowded upon the floor. Hope gladdened all 
 as they forecast the coming greatness of their land. 
 
 * Luzerne to Ycrgenncs, 13 December 17S3. MS. 
 I Ibid. 
 
108 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; ch. i. 
 
 Eising wltli dignity, Washington spoke of tlie rectitude of 
 the common cause ; the support of congress ; of his country- 
 men ; of Providence ; and he commended the interests of " our 
 dearest country to the care of Ahuighty God.*' Then saying 
 that he had finished the work assigned him to do, he bade an 
 affectionate farewell to the august body under whose orders he 
 had so long acted, resigned with satisfaction the commission 
 which he had accepted with diffidence, and took leave of public 
 life. His emotion was so great that, as he advanced and de- 
 livered up his commission, he seemed unable to have uttered 
 more. 
 
 The hand that wrote the declaration of independence pre- 
 pared the words which, in the name of congress, its president, 
 turning pale from excess of feeling, then addressed to Wash- 
 ington, who stood, filling and commanding every eye : 
 
 " Sir : The United States in congress assembled receive 
 vdth emotions too affecting for utterance the solemn resigna- 
 tion of the authorities under which you have led their troops 
 with success through a perilous and a doubtful war. Called 
 upon by your country to defend its invaded rights, you accept- 
 ed the sacred charge before it had formed alliances, and whilst 
 it was without funds or a government to support you. You 
 have conducted the great military contest with wisdom and forti- 
 tude, invariably regarding the rights of the civil power through 
 all disasters and changes. You have persevered till these United 
 States, aided by a magnanimous king and nation, have been ena- 
 bled under a just Providence to close the war in freedom, safe- 
 ty, and independence. Having taught a lesson useful to those 
 who inflict and to those who feel oppression, with the blessings 
 of your fellow-citizens, you retire from the great theatre of 
 action ; but the glory of your virtues will continue to animate 
 remotest ages. We join you in commending the interests of 
 our dearest country to the protection of Almighty God, be- 
 seeching him to dispose the hearts and minds of its citizens to 
 improve the opportunity afforded them of becoming a happy 
 and respectable nation." 
 
 'No more pleasing words could have reached Washington 
 than those which pledged congress to the reform of the na- 
 tional government. The allusion to the alliance with France 
 
1783. THE LEGACY OF WASHINGTON. 109 
 
 was riglit, for otherwise the achievement of independence 
 would seem to have been attributed to the United States alone. 
 But France and England were now at peace ; and after their 
 reconciliation Washington, the happiest of warriors, as he un- 
 girded the sword, would not recall that they had been at war. 
 The business of the day being over, "Washington set out 
 for Mount Yernon, and on Christmas eve, after an absence of 
 nearly nine years, he crossed the threshold of his own home ; 
 but not to find rest there, for the doom of greatness was upon 
 him. 
 
110 0]^ THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION. B.n.; oh. ii. 
 
 (^ 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 VIRGINIA STATESMEN LEAD TOWARD A BETTER UNION. 
 
 1784:. 
 
 Of many causes promoting union, four above others exer- 
 cised a steady and commanding influence. The new republic 
 ^^as one nation must have power to regulate its foreign com- 
 ^Inerce; to colonize its large • domain ; to provide an adequate 
 *!* revenue; and to establish justice in domestic trade by prohib- 
 iting the separate states from impairing the obligation of con- 
 ^^tracts. Each of these four causes was of vital importance; 
 but the necessity for regulating commerce gave the immediatp 
 impulse to a more perfect constitution. Happily, the British 
 order in council of the second of July 1783 restricted to Brit- 
 ish subjects and ships the carrying of American produce from 
 American ports to any British West India island, and the car- 
 rying of the produce of those islands to any port in America. 
 " This proclamation," wrote John Adams to Secretary Living- 
 ston, " is issued in full confidence that the United States can- 
 not agree to act as one nation. They will soon see the neces- 
 sity of measures to counteract their enemies. If there is not 
 sufficient authority to draw together the minds, affections, and 
 forces of the states in their common foreign concerns, we shall 
 be the sport of transatlantic politicians, who hate liberty and 
 every country that enjoys it." * 
 
 Letters of Adams and one of like tenor from Franklin 
 having been fully considered, congress, on the twenty -ninth 
 of September 1783, agreed that the United States could become 
 respectable only by more energy in government ; but, as usual, 
 
 * Diplomatic Correspondence, vii., 81, 100. 
 
1784. TOWARD A BETTER UNION. HI 
 
 they only referred " tlie important subject under deliberation " 
 to a special committee,* which, having Arthur Lee for one 
 of its members, in due time reported that "as the several 
 states are sovereign and independent, and possess the power of 
 acting as may to them seem best, congress will not attempt to 
 point out the path. The mode for joint efforts will suggest 
 itself to the good sense of America." f 
 
 The states could not successfully defend themselves against 
 the policy of Great Britain by separate legislation, because it 
 was not the interest of any one of them to exclude British 
 vessels from their harbors unless the like measure should be 
 adopted by every other ; and a union of thirteen distinct pow- 
 ers would encounter the very difficulty which had so often 
 proved insuperable. But, while every increase of the power 
 of congress in domestio aifairs roused jealousies between the 
 states, the selfish design of a foreign government to repress 
 their industry drew them together against a common adver- 
 sary. 
 
 The complete cession of the I^orth-west and the grant of 
 the desired impost were the offerings of Yirginia to the gen- 
 eral welfare. X Simultaneously her legislature, on the fourth 
 of December, took cognizance of the aggressions on equal com- 
 merce. The Virginians owned not much shipping, and had 
 no special interest in the West India trade ; but the British 
 prohibitory policy offended their pride and their sense of 
 honor, and, as in the war they had looked upon " union as the 
 rock of their political salvation," so they again " rang the bell " 
 to call the other states to council. They complained of " a 
 disposition in Great Britain to gain partial advantages, injurious 
 to the rights of free commerce and repugnant to the principles 
 of reciprocal interest and convenience which form the only 
 permanent foundation of friendly intercourse ; " and on the 
 ninth unanimously consented to empower congress to adopt 
 the most effectual mode of counteracting restrictions on Ameri- 
 can navigation so long as they should be continued.*" The 
 
 * Secret Journals of Congress, iii., 398-400. 
 
 I Reports of committees on increasing; the powers of congress, p. 03. MS. 
 X Joseph Jones to Jefccrson, 21 and 29 December 1783. 
 
 * Journal of House of Delegates, 50 ; Ilening, xi., 313. 
 
112 0^ THE T7AT TO A FEDERAL COiTVEJSrTIOK b.ii.; cn.ii. 
 
 governor, by direction, communicated the act to the executive 
 authority of the other states, requesting their immediate adop- 
 tion of similar measures ; " * and he sent to the delegates of 
 his own state in congress a report of what had been done. 
 This is the first in the series of measures through which Vir- 
 ginia marshalled the United States on their way to a better 
 union. 
 
 In the fourth congress JeSerson carried forward the work 
 of Madison with alacrity. The two cherished for each other 
 the closest and the most honorable friendship, agreeing in 
 efforts to bind the states more closely in all that related to the 
 common welfare. In their copious correspondence they opened 
 their minds to each other with frankness and independence. 
 
 The delegates of Rhode Island insisted that the connterac- 
 tion of the British navigation acts must be intrusted to each 
 separate state; but they stood alone, Roger Sherman voting 
 against them, and so dividing Connecticut. Then the proposal 
 of the committee of which Jefferson was a member and of 
 which all but Gerry were from the Sonth, that congress, with 
 the assent of nine states, might exercise prohibitory powers 
 over foreign commerce for the term of fifteen years, was 
 adopted without opposition.! 
 
 Keeping in mind that, while the articles of confederation 
 did not directly confer on congress the regulation of commerce 
 by enactments, they granted the amplest authority to frame 
 commercial treaties, Jefferson prepared a plan for intercourse 
 wdth powers of Europe from Britain to the Ottoman Porte, 
 and with the Barbary states. His draft of instructions J de- 
 ''scribed " the United States as one nation upon the principles 
 of the federal constitution." * In a document of the preceding 
 congress mention had been made of "the federal govern- 
 ment," and Rhode Island had forthwith moved to substitute 
 the word union, conceding that there was a union of the states, 
 but not a government ; but the motion had been supported by 
 
 * Journal of House of Delegates for 22 December 1783. Governor Harrison 
 to the governor of Massachusetts, 25 December 11S2. MS. 
 
 f Journals of Congress, iv., 392, 393. 
 
 X Jefferson to John Q. Adams, 30 March 1826. Jefferson, vii., 436. 
 
 * Secret Journals of Congress, iii., 453. 
 
1784. TOWARD A BETTER UNIOK 113 
 
 no other state, and by no individuals outside of Rhode Island 
 except Hoi ten and Arthur Lee. This time Sherman and his 
 colleague, James Wadsworth, placed Connecticut by the side 
 of Rhode Island. They were joined only by Arthur Lee, 
 and congress, on the twenty-sixth of March, adopting the 
 words of Jeiferson, by the vote of eight states to two, of nine- 
 teen individuals to five, decided that in treaties and all cases 
 arising under them the United States form " one nation." '^ 
 
 On the principles according to which commercial treaties 
 should be framed America was unanimous. In October 1783 
 congress had proposed the most perfect equality and reciproci- 
 ty, f Jefferson, while he would accept a system of reciproci- 
 ty, reported as the choice of America that there should be 
 no navigation laws ; no distinction between metropolitan and 
 colonial ports ; an equal right for each party to carry its own 
 products in its own ships into all ports of the other and to 
 take away its products, freely if possible, if not, paying no 
 other duties than are paid by the most favored nation. In 
 time of war there should be an abandonment of privateering ; 
 the least possible interference with industry on land ; the in- 
 violability of fishermen ; the strictest limitation of contraband ; 
 free commerce between neutrals and belligerents in articles not 
 contraband; no paper blockades; in short, free trade and a 
 humane international code. These instructions congress ac- 
 cepted, and, to give them effect, Adams, Franklin, and Jeffer- 
 son were, on the seventh of May, commissioned for two years, 
 with the consent of any two of them, to negotiate treaties of 
 ten or fifteen years' duration. j(. 
 
 The foreign commercial system of the nation was to be 
 blended with the domestic intercourse of the states. High- 
 ways by water and land from Yirginia to the West would ad- 
 vance its welfare and strengthen the union. Jefferson opened 
 the subject to Madison,* who, in reply, explained the necessity 
 of a mutual appointment of commissioners by Maryland and 
 Yirginia for regulating the navigation of the Potomac. " The 
 
 * Secret Journals of Congress for 26 March 1784, iii., 452-454. 
 •j- Secret Journals of Congress, iii., 412, 413. 
 
 if. Secret Journals of Congress, ill., 484, 485, and 491-499. 
 
 * Jefferson to Madison, Annapolis, 20 February 1784. 
 
 VOL. YI. — 8 
 
114 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION", s.n.; on.ii. 
 
 good humor into whicli the cession of the back lands must 
 have put Maryland forms an apt crisis for negotiations." * 
 
 In March 178i Jefferson cautiously introduced the subject 
 to Washington,f and then wrote more urgently : " Your fu- 
 ture time and wishes are sacred in my eye ; but, if the super- 
 intendence of this work would be only a dignified amusement 
 to you, what a monument of your retirement would follow that 
 of your public life ! " :j: 
 
 Washington " was very happy that a man of dissernment 
 and hberality like Jefferson thought as he did." More than 
 ten years before he had been a principal mover of a bill for 
 the extension of navigation from tide-water to Will's creek. 
 " To get the business in motion," he writes, " I was obliged to 
 comprehend James river. The plan was in a tolerably good 
 train when I set out for Cambridge in 1775, and would have 
 been in an excellent way had it not met with difficulties in the 
 Maryland assembly. Not a moment ought to be lost in recom- 
 mencing this business." * 
 
 He too, like Madison, advised concert with the men of 
 Maryland. Conforming to their advice, Jefferson conferred 
 with Thomas Stone, then one of the Maryland delegates in 
 congress, and undertook by letters to originate the subject in 
 the legislature of Virginia. || 
 
 Before the end of June the two houses unanimously re- 
 quested the executive to procure a statue of Washington, to be 
 of the finest marble and best workmanship, with this inscrip- 
 tion on its pedestal : 
 
 " The general assembly of the commonwealth of Virginia 
 have caused this statue to be erected as a monument of affection 
 and gratitude to George Washington, who, to the endowments 
 of the hero uniting the virtues of the patriot, and exerting 
 both in establishing the liberties of his country, has rendered 
 his name dear to his fellow-citizens, and given the world an 
 immortal example of true glory." ^ 
 
 * Madison to Jefferson, 16 March 1784. Madison, i., 74. 
 f Jefferson to Washington, 6 March 1784. 
 
 :]: Jefferson to Washington, 15 :^rarch 1784. Letters to W., iv., 62-66. 
 
 * Washington to Jefferson, 29 March 1784. Sparks, ix., 81, 32. 
 
 I Jefferson to Madison, 25 April 1784. Partly printed in Rives, i., 560. 
 ^ Heniug, xi., 552. 
 
1784. TOWARD A BETTER UNION. 115 
 
 The vote, emanating from the affections of the people of 
 Yirginia, marks his mastery over the heart of his native state. 
 That mastery he always used to promote the formation of 
 a national constitution. He had hardly reached home from 
 the war when he poured out his inmost thoughts to Harrison, 
 the doubting governor of his commonwealth : 
 
 " The prospect before us is fair ; I believe all things will 
 come right at last ; but the disinclination of the states to yield 
 competent powers to congress for the federal government will, 
 if there is not a change in the system, be our downfall as a 
 nation. This is as clear to me as A, B, C. We have arrived 
 at peace and independency to very little purpose, if we cannot 
 conquer our own prejudices. The powers of Earope begin to 
 see this, and our newly acquired friends, the British, are al- 
 ready and professedly acting upon this ground ; and wisely too, 
 if we are determined to persevere in our folly. They know that 
 individual opposition to their measures is futile, and boast that 
 we are not sufficiently united as a nation to give a general one. 
 Is not the indignity of this declaration, in the very act of peace- 
 making and conciliation, sufficient to stimulate/ us to vest ade- 
 quate powers in the sovereign of these United States ? 
 
 " An extension of federal powers would make us one of the 
 most wealthy, happy, respectable and powerful nations that 
 ever inhabited the terrestrial globe. Without them, we shall 
 soon be everything which is the direct reverse. I predict the 
 worst consequences from a half-starved, limping government, 
 always moving upon crutches and tottering at every step." ^ 
 
 The immensity of the ungranted public domain which had 
 passed from the English crown to the American people invited 
 them to establish a continental empire of republics. Lines of 
 communication with the western country implied its coloniza- 
 tion. In the war, Jefferson, as a member of the legislature, 
 had promoted the expedition by which Yirginia conquered the 
 region north-west of the Ohio ; as governor he had taken part 
 in its cession to the United States. The cession had included 
 the demand of a guarantee to Yirginia of the remainder of its 
 territory. This the United States had refused, and Yirginia 
 receded from the demand. On the iirst day of March 1784, 
 
 * Washington to Earrison, 18 January 1*784. Sparks, ix., 12 and 13. 
 
IIG ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONYENTIOK b.ii.; ch. ii. 
 
 Jefferson, in congress, vnth his colleagues, Hardy, Arthur Lee, 
 and James Monroe, in conformity with full powers from their 
 commonwealth, signed, sealed, and delivered a deed by which, 
 with some reservation of land, they ceded to the United States 
 all claim to the territory north-west of the Ohio. On that same 
 day, before the deed could be recorded and enrolled among the 
 acts of the United States, Jefferson, as chairman of a commit- 
 tee, presented a plan for the temporary government of the 
 western territory from the southern boundary of the United 
 States in the latitude of thirty-one degrees to the Lake of the 
 Woods. It is still preserved in the national archives in his 
 own handwriting, and is as completely his own work as the 
 declaration of independence. 
 
 He pressed upon Virginia to establish the meridian of the 
 mouth of the Kanawha as its western boundary, and to cede 
 all beyond to the United States. To Madison he wrote : " For 
 God's sake, push this at the next session of assembly. We hope 
 ]!!Torth Carohna will cede all beyond the same meridian," * his 
 object being to obtain cessions to the United States of all 
 southern territory west of the meridian of the Kanawha. 
 
 In dividing all the country north-west of the Ohio into ton 
 states, Jefferson was controlled by an act of congress of 1Y80 
 which was incorporated into the cession of Virginia. 'No land 
 was to be taken up till it should have been purchased from the 
 Indian proprietors and offered for sale by the United States. 
 In each incipient state no property qualification was required 
 either of the electors or the elected ; it was enough for them to 
 be free men, resident, and of full age. Under the authority of 
 congress, and following the precedent of any one of the states, 
 the settlers were to establish a temporary government ; when 
 they should have increased to twenty thousand, they might in- 
 stitute a permanent government, with a member in congress, 
 having a right to debate but not to vote ; and, when they should 
 be equal in number to the inhabitants of the least populous 
 state, their delegates, with the consent of nine states, as re- 
 quired by the confederation, were to be admitted into the con- 
 gress of the United States on an equal footing. 
 
 The ordinance contained five other articles : The new states 
 
 * Jefferson to Madison, 20 February 1'784. 
 
1784. TOWARD A BETTER UNION. 117 
 
 shall remain forever a part of tlie United States of America ; 
 they shall bear the same relation to the confederation as the 
 original states ; they shall pay their apportionment of the fed- 
 eral debts ; they shall in their governments uphold republican 
 forms ; and after the year 1800 of the Christian era there shall 
 be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in any of them. 
 
 At that time slavery prevailed throughout much more than 
 haK the lands of Europe. Jefferson, following an impulse from 
 his own mind, designed by his ordinance to establish from end 
 to end of the whole country a north and south line, at which 
 the westward extension of slavery should be stayed by an im- 
 passable bound. Of the men held in bondage beyond that line 
 he did not propose the instant emancipation ; but slavery was 
 to be rung out with the departing century, so that in all the 
 western territory, whether held in 1784 by Georgia, !North 
 Carolina, Yirginia, or the United States, the sun of the new 
 century might dawn on no slave. 
 
 To make the decree irrevocable, he further proposed that 
 all the articles should form a charter of compact, to be executed 
 in congress under the seal of the United States, and to stand 
 as fundamental constitutions between the thirteen original 
 states and the new states to be erected under the ordinance. 
 
 The design of Jefferson marks an era in the history of uni- 
 versal freedom. For the moment more was attempted than 
 could be accompHshed. North Carolina, in the following June, 
 made a cession of all her western lands, but soon revoked it ; 
 and Yirginia did not release Kentucky till it became a state of 
 the union. Moreover, the sixteen years during which slavery 
 was to have a respite might nurse it into such strength that at 
 their end it would be able to defy or reverse the ordinance. 
 
 Exactly on the ninth anniversary of the fight at Concord 
 and Lexington, Richard Dobbs Spaight of l^orth Carolina, 
 seconded by Jacob Eead of South Carolina, moved " to strike 
 out" the fifth article. The presiding officer, following the 
 rule of the time, put the question : " Shall the words stand ? " 
 Seven states, and seven only, were needed to carry the affirm- 
 ative. Let Jefferson, who did not refrain from describing 
 Spaight as " a young fool," relate what followed. " The clause 
 was lost by an individual vote only. Ten states were present. 
 
118 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTIOiT. b.ii.; oh.h. 
 
 The four eastern states, New York, and Pennsylvania were for 
 the clause ; Jersey would have been for it, but there were but 
 two members, one of whom was sick in his chambers. South 
 Carolina, Maryland, and J Yirgiaia J voted against it. North ' 
 Carolina was divided, as w^ould have been Yirginia, had not 
 one of its delegates been sick in bed." * The absent Yirginian 
 was Monroe, who for himself has left no evidence of such an 
 intention, and who was again absent when in the following 
 year the question was revived. For North Carolina, the vote 
 of Spaight was neutralized by "VYilliamson. 
 
 Six states against three, sixteen men against seven, pro- 
 scribed slavery. Jefferson bore witness against it all his life 
 long. Wythe and himself, as commissioners to codify the laws 
 of Yirginia, had provided for gradual emancipation. When, 
 in 1785, the legislature refused to consider tlie proposal, Jeffer- 
 son wrote : " We must hope that an overruling Providence is 
 preparing the deliverance of these our suffering brethren." f 
 In 1T8G, narrating the loss of the clause against slavery in the 
 ordinance of 1784, he said : " The voice of a single individual 
 would have prevented this abominable crime ; heaven will not 
 always be silent ; tlie friends to tiie rights of human nature will 
 in the end prevail." :j: 
 
 To friends who visited him in the last period of his life 
 he delighted to renew these aspirations of his earlier years.* 
 In a letter written just forty-hve days before his death he 
 refers to the ordinance of 1784, saying: " My sentiments have 
 been forty years before the public ; although I shall not live 
 to see them consummated, they will not die with me ; but, 
 hving or dying, they will ever be in my most fervent prayer." 1 
 
 On the twenty-third of April the ordinance for the govern- 
 ment of the north-western territory, shorn of its proscription 
 of slavery, was adopted, and remained in force for three years. 
 On the 7th of May, Jefferson reported an ordinance for ascer- 
 taining the mode of locating and disposing of the public lands. 
 The continental domain, when purchased of the Indians, was 
 
 * Jefferson to Madison, 25 April 1784. 
 
 f Jefferson, ix., 279. 1;. Ibid., 276. 
 
 * Oral communication from William Campbell Preston of South Carolina. 
 H Jefferson to James Hcaton, 20 May 1826. 
 
1784. TOWARD A BETTER UNIOK 119 
 
 to be divided by the surveyors into townships of ten geograpM- 
 cal miles square, the townships into hundreds of one mile 
 square, and with such precautions that the wilderness could be 
 mapped out into ranges of lots so exactly as to preclude uncer- 
 tainty of title. As to inheritance, the words of the ordinance 
 were : " The lands therein shall pass in descent and dower ac- 
 cording to the customs known in the common law by the name 
 of gavelkind." * Upon this ordinance of Jefferson, most 
 thoughtfully prepared and written wholly by his own hand, no 
 final vote was taken. 
 
 Congress had already decided to establish a mint. For the 
 American coinage, Eobert and Gouverneur Morris proposed 
 the decimal system of computation, with silver as the only 
 metallic money, and the fourteen hundred and fortieth part of 
 a Spanish piece of eight reals, or, as the Americans called it, 
 the dollar, as the unit of the currency. Jefierson chose the 
 dollar, which circulated freely in every part of the American 
 continent, as the money unit for computation ; and the sub- 
 division of the dollar into a tenth, a hundredth, and a thou- 
 sandth part. For coinage, he proposed a gold coin of ten dol- 
 lars ; silver coins of one dollar and of one tenth of a dollar ; and 
 copper coins of one hundredth part cf a dollar, f This system 
 steadily grew in favor ; and, in 1786, was established by con- 
 gress without a negative vote. :[: 
 
 The total cost of the war, from the first blood shed at Lex- 
 ington to the general orders of Washington in April 1783, 
 proclaiming peace, was reckoned by Jefferson * at one hundred 
 and forty millions of dollars. Congress, before the formation 
 of the confederacy, had emitted paper money to the amount of 
 two hundred millions of dollars, which at the time of its emis- 
 sion might, as he thought, have had the value of thirty-six 
 millions of silver dollars ; the value of the masses of paper 
 emitted by the several states at various stages of the war he 
 estimated at thirty-six millions more. This estimate of the 
 values of the paper money rests in part upon conjecture, and 
 
 * Papers of Old Congress, xxx., 59. MS. 
 
 f Jefferson, i., 54. Notes on the establishment of a money unit and of a coin, 
 age for the United States. Ibid., 162-174. 
 
 X Journals of Congress, iv., 376, for 8 August 1786. * Jefferson, ix., 260. 
 
120 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; oh.ii. 
 
 the materials for correcting it witli accuracy, especially as it re- 
 gards the issues of the states, are wanting. The remaining cost 
 of the war, or sixty-eight millions of dollars, with the exception 
 of about one and a half million paid on requisition by the sev- 
 eral states, existed on the first of January 1784, in the form of 
 debts in Europe to the amount of nearly eight millions of dol- 
 lars ; of debts due to the several classes of domestic creditors ; 
 and of debts due to states for advances on the common account. 
 The value of the paper money issued by congress had perished 
 as it passed from hand to hand, and its circulation had ceased. 
 
 In preparing the appropriations for the coming year, con- 
 gress was met at the threshold by an unforeseen difiiculty. 
 Bills of Morris on Holland, that were protested for non-accept- 
 ance, would amount, with damages on protest for non-accept- 
 ance, to six hundred and thirty-six thousand dollars. To save 
 the honor of the country, this sum was demanded of the sepa- 
 rate states in a circular letter drawn by Jefferson. But, mean- 
 time, John Adams, in Amsterdam, manfully struggled to meet 
 the drafts, and, by combining the allurement of a lottery with 
 that of a very profitable loan, he succeeded. 
 
 The court of France, with delicacy and generosity, of its own 
 motion released the United States from the paj^ment of interest 
 on their obligations during the war and for the first period of 
 peace ; and they on their part by formal treaty bound them- 
 selves to the payment of interest as it should accrue from the 
 beginning of the year 1784. 
 
 For that year the sum required for the several branches of 
 the public service was estimated at about four hundred and 
 fifty thousand dollars ; for the interest on the foreign debt, 
 nearly four hundred thousand dollars ; the balance of interest 
 and the interest on the domestic debt, about six hundred and 
 eighty thousand dollars ; the deficit of the last two years, one 
 million ; other arrears connected with the debt, nearly one 
 million three hundred thousand dollars : in all, about four mill- 
 ions. This was a greater sum than could be asked for. In- 
 stead of making new requisitions, Jefferson credited all federal 
 payments of the states to the requisition of eight millions of 
 dollars in the first year of the confederacy. One half of that 
 requisition was remitted ; of the other, three states had paid 
 
1784. TOWARD A BETTER UNION. 121 
 
 nothing, tlie rest had paid less than a million and a half ; a 
 balance would remain oi nearly two millions seven hundred 
 thousand dollars ; and of this balance a requisition was made 
 on each of the states for its just proportion. The apportion- 
 ment, if collected within the year, would defray the expenses 
 of all the departments of the general government and the in- 
 terest on the foreign and domestic loans, leaving only some 
 part of domestic arrears to be provided for at a later day. 
 Could this system be carried into effect, the credit of the 
 government would be established. 
 
 Madison had acceded to the wishes of his county, that he 
 should be one of its representatives in the legislature, believing 
 that he might there best awaken Yirginia to the glory of tak- 
 ing the lead in the rescue of the union and the blessings 
 staked on union from an impending catastrophe."^ Jefferson 
 had kept him thoroughly informed of the movement for bring- 
 ing order into the public finances. At the instigation of 
 Madison, Philip Mazzei, an Italian, then in quest of a con- 
 sular appointment in Europe,! V^^^ ^ ^^^^ *^ Patrick Henry, 
 " the great leader who had been violently opposed to every 
 idea of increasing the power of congress." j^ On his return, 
 Mazzei reported that the present politics of Henry compre- 
 hended very fnendly views toward the confederacy, and a 
 support of the payment of British debts.* 
 
 At Pichmond, on the fourteenth of May, before the assem- 
 bly proceeded to active business, Henry sought a conference 
 with Madison and Jones, and declared to them that " a bold 
 example set by Yirginia would have infiuence on the other 
 states ; " "he saw ruin inevitable unless something was done 
 to give congress a compulsory process on delinquent states." 
 This conviction, he said, was his only inducement for coming 
 into the present assembly. It was agreed that Jones and 
 Madison should sketch some plan for giving greater power to 
 the federal government, and Henry promised to sustain it on 
 the floor. A majority of the assembly were new members, 
 composed of young men and officers of the late army, so that 
 
 * Gilpin, 693, 694 ; Elliot, 113. f Jefferson to Madison, 16 March 1784. 
 X Edward Bancroft to William Frazer, 28 May 1784. 
 
 * Madison to Jefferson, 23 April 17S4. Madison, i., 73. 
 
122 01^ THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION B.n.; CH.n. 
 
 new measures were expected. Great hopes were formed of 
 Madison, and those who knew him best were sure that he 
 would not disappoint the most sanguine expectations.* 
 
 Virginia passed an act empowering congress, for anj term 
 not exceeding fifteen years, to prohibit the importation or ex- 
 portation of goods to or from that state in vessels belonging to 
 subjects of powers with whom the United States had no com- 
 mercial treaty, f They consented that the contributions of 
 the state to the general treasury should be in proportion to 
 the population, counting three fifths of the slaves. All appre- 
 hension of danger from conceding a reveime to the confeder- 
 acy seemed to have passed away ; and it was agreed that, pend- 
 ing the acceptance of the amendment to the constitution, any 
 apportionment of the requisitions dh^ected by congress for the 
 purpose of discharging the national debt and the expenses of 
 the national government ought to be complied with. It was 
 further resolved that the accounts subsisting between the United 
 States and individual states should be settled, and that then 
 the balance due ought to be enforced, if necessary, by distress 
 on the property of defaulting states or of their citizens. These 
 resolutions passed the legislature without a division. J It re- 
 mained to see what effect the measures of Virginia would have 
 on the other twelve states and on herself. 
 
 Experience had proved the impossibility of keeping to- 
 gether a sufficient representation of the states in congress. It 
 began to be thought better to hold but a short and active an- 
 nual session of the national congress with compulsory attend- 
 ance of its members, and appoint commissioners of the states 
 to conduct executive business for the rest of the year. This 
 proposition was one of the last which Jefferson assisted to 
 carry through. He had wished to visit "Washington before 
 his voyage ; but, armed with at least one-and-twenty commis- 
 sions for himself and his two associates to negotiate treaties 
 with foreign powers, he was obliged to repair to Boston, 
 
 * William Short to T. Jefferson, 14 May 178-1; Madison to Jefferson, 15 May 
 1784, Madison, i., SO; Edward Bancroft to William Frazer, 28 May 1784. In 
 the letter of Short to Jefferson, the date is probably an error for May 15. Seo 
 Madison, i., 80, " last evening." 
 
 f Ilening, xi., 888. X Journal of the Committee of the States, p. V. 
 
1784:. TOWARD A BETTER UNIOK 123 
 
 where, after " experiencing in the highest degree its hospital- 
 ity and civihties," '^ he embarked for France on the fifth of 
 July, full of hope that the attempt to negotiate a treaty of com- 
 merce with Great Britain would meet with success, f Before 
 leaving the country he wrote to Madison : " The best effects 
 are produced by sending our young statesmen to congress. 
 Here tliey see the affairs of tlie confederacy from a high 
 ground ; they learn the importance of the imion, and befriend 
 federal measures when they return." :j: 
 
 The committee of states came together on the fourth of 
 June. Four states never attended ; and, as the assent of nine 
 was required to carry any proposition except adjournment, the 
 absence or the negative of one state stopped all proceedings. A 
 difference occurring on the eleventh of August, the members 
 from three ^ew England states went home ; the remaining six 
 states met irregularly till the nineteenth of that month ; and 
 then, from inability to do any manner of business, they with- 
 drew. The United States of America were left without any 
 visible representation whatever. The chief benefit from the 
 experiment was to establish in the minds of Americans the 
 necessity of vesting the executive power, not in a body of 
 men, but, as Jefferson phrased it, in a single arbiter. 
 
 This was the state of the government when, on the first 
 of November, Bobert Morris retired from his ofBce as super- 
 intendent of the finances of the United States. He had con- 
 ciliated the support of the moneyed men at home.* His bank 
 of ]N"orth America, necessarily of little advantage to the United 
 States, proved highly remunerative to its stockholders ; || the 
 bankruptcy of the nation could have been prevented only by 
 the nation itself. Congress passed an act that for the future 
 no person, appointed a commissioner of the treasury of the 
 United States, should be permitted to be engaged, either di- 
 
 * Jefferson to Gcrr}^, 2 July 1784. Austin's Life of Gerry, i., 55. 
 
 f Information from Edward Bancroft, 26 August 1784. 
 
 X Jefferson to Madison, 25 April 1784. * Hamilton, i., 316, 317. 
 
 II The dividend for the first half year of the bank was four and a half per 
 cent ; for the second, four and one fourth ; for the third, six and one half ; for 
 the fourth, eight ; for the fifth, a little more than nine and a half per cent. Official 
 report in Pennsylvania Packet for 6 July 1782 ; 7 January 1783 ; 8 July 1783 ; 
 6 January 1784; 8 July 1784. 
 
124: OK THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION b.ii.; ch.h. 
 
 rectly or indirectly, in any trade or commerce whatsoever.* 
 Before retiring, Morris announced to the representative of 
 France in America that he could not pay the interest on the 
 Dutch loan of ten million livres for which France was the 
 guarantee, f a default which deeply injured the reputation of 
 the United States in Paris. :j: He could still less provide for 
 paying the interest for 1784 on the direct debt to France. 
 
 The members of the lifth congress arrived so slowly at 
 Trenton that Marbois, who was charged with French affairs, 
 on the twentieth of November reported what at the moment 
 was true : " There is in America no general government, neither 
 congress, nor president, nor head of any one administrative 
 department." ^ Six days later, while there was still no quorum 
 in congress, Eichard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, 
 wrote to Madison : " It is by many here suggested, as a very 
 necessary step for congress to take, the calling on the states 
 to form a convention for the sole purpose of revising the con- 
 federation, so far as to enable congress to execute with more 
 energy, effect, and vigor the powers assigned to it than it ap- 
 pears by experience that they can do under the present state 
 of things." In a letter of the same date Mercer said : " There 
 will be a motion made early in the ensuing congress for such 
 a convention." 1 Madison, who knew the heart of his corre- 
 spondents, answered Lee firmly and yet warily : " The union 
 of the states is essential to their safety against foreign danger 
 and internal contention ; the perpetuity and efficacy of the 
 present system cannot be confided in ; the question, therefore, 
 is, in what mode and at what moment the experiment for sup- 
 plying the defects ought to be made." ^ 
 
 ^' The American confederation," so thought the French 
 minister at Yersailles, " has a strong tendency to dissolution ; 
 it is well that on this point we have neither obligations to 
 fulfil nor any interest to care for." () 
 
 * Journals of Congress for 28 May 1'784. 
 
 f Robert Morris to Marbois, IV August 11S4:. Diplomatic Correspondence, 
 xii., 494. j^ Edward Bancroft to Lord Carmarthen, Paris, 8 December 1*784. 
 
 * Marbois to Rayneval, 20 November 1*784. 
 
 II J. F. Mercer to Madison, 26 November 1784. ^ Gilpin, 101, 708. 
 
 {) To Marbois, Versailles, 14 December 1784. 
 
1784. THE WEST. 125 
 
 CHAPTEE III. 
 
 THE WEST. 
 
 1784-1785. 
 
 The desire to hold and to people the great western domain 
 mingled with every effort for imparting greater energy to the 
 union. In that happy region each state saw the means of 
 granting lands to its soldiers of the revolution and a possession, 
 of inestimable promise. Washington took up the office of 
 securing the national allegiance of the transmontane woodsmen 
 by improving the channels of communication with the states 
 on the Atlantic. For that purpose, more than to look after 
 lands of his own, he, on the first day of September, began a 
 tour to the westward to make an examination of the portages 
 between the nearest navigable branches of the Potomac and 
 James river on the one side and of the Ohio and the Kanawha 
 on the other. Wherever he came, he sought and closely ques- 
 tioned the men famed for personal observation of the streams 
 and paths on each side of the AUeghanies. 
 
 From Fort Cumberland he took the usual road over the 
 mountains to the valley of the Yohogany,* and studied closely 
 the branches of that stream. The country between the Little 
 Kanawha and the branches of the James river being at that 
 moment infested with hostile Indians, he returned through the 
 houseless solitude between affluents of the Cheat river and of 
 
 * Yohogany is the " phoaetical " mode of spelling for yOugHIOgany, as the 
 English wrote the Indian name ; the French, discarding the gutturals, wrote Ohio. 
 So at the North-east the French dropped the first two syllables of Passam-Aquoddy, 
 and made of the last three Acadie. The name Belle Riviere is a translation of 
 Allegh-any. 
 
126 0^ THE ^AY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; oh.hi. 
 
 the Potomac. As lie traced tlie way for commerce over that 
 \vild region he was compelled to pass a night on a rough moun- 
 tain-side in a pouring rain, with no companion but a servant 
 and no protection but his cloak ; one day he was without food ; 
 sometimes he could find no path except the track of buffaloes ; 
 and in unceasing showers his ride through the close bushes 
 seemed to him little better than the swimming of rivulets.* 
 
 Eeaching home after an absence of thirty-three days, he 
 declared himself pleased with the results of his tour. Com- 
 bining his observations with the reminiscences of his youthful 
 mission to the French in the heart of Ohio, he sketched in his 
 mind a system of internal communication of the Potomac with 
 the Ohio ; of an affluent of the Ohio with the Cuyahoga ; and 
 so from the site of Cleveland to Detroit, and onward to the 
 Lake of the Woods. 
 
 Six days after his return he sent a most able report to 
 Harrison, then governor of Yirginia. "We should do our 
 part toward opening the communication for the fur and peltry 
 trade of the lakes," such were his words, " and for the produce 
 of the country, which will be settled faster than any other 
 ever was, or aiiy one would imagine. But there is a political 
 consideration for so doing which is of still greater importance. 
 
 " I need not remark to you, sir, that the flanks and rear of 
 the United States are possessed by other powers, and formida- 
 ble ones too ; nor how necessary it is to apply interest to bind 
 all parts of the union together by indissoluble bonds. The 
 western states, I speak now from my own observation, stand 
 as it were upon a pivot ; the touch of a feather would turn 
 them any way. They have looked down the Mississippi until 
 the Spaniards threw difficulties in their way. The untoward 
 disposition of the Spaniards on the one hand and the policy of 
 Great Britain on the other to retain as long as possible the 
 posts of Detroit, Magara, and Oswego, may be improved to 
 the greatest advantage by this state if she would open the ave- 
 nues to the trade of that country." f 
 
 Harrison heartily approved the views of Washington, and 
 laid his letter before the assembly of Yirginia, whose members 
 
 * Washington's Journal. MS. 
 
 f Washington to Harrison, 10 October 118i. Sparks, ix., 62, 63, 64. 
 
1784-1785. THE WEST. 127 
 
 gladly accepted its large views and stood ready to give them 
 legislative support. "^ 
 
 Meantime Lafayette, wlio was making a tour through the 
 United States and receiving everywhere a grateful and joj^ous 
 welcome, was expected in Virginia. For the occasion, Wasli- 
 ington repaired to Kichmond ; and there, on the fifteenth of 
 l!^ovember, the assembly, to mark their reverence and affec- 
 tion, sent Patrick Henry, Madison, and others to assure him 
 that they retained the most lasting impressions of the tran- 
 scendent services rendered in his late public character, and had 
 proofs that no change of situation could turn his thoughts from 
 the welfare of his country. 
 
 Three days later the house, by the same committee, ad- 
 dressed Lafayette, recalling " his cool intrepidity and wise con- 
 duct during his command in the campaign of 1781, and, as the 
 wish most suitable to his character, desired that those who 
 might emulate his glory would equally pursue the interests of 
 humanity." 
 
 From Eichmond Lafayette accompanied Washington to 
 Mount Vernon, and, after a short visit, was attended by his 
 host as far as Annapolis, where he received the congratulations 
 of Maryland. On the thirteenth of December congress, in a 
 public session, took leave of him with every mark of honor. 
 In his answer he repeated the great injunctions of Washing- 
 ton's farewell letter, and, having travelled widely in the coun- 
 try, bore witness to " the prevaihng disposition of the people 
 to strengthen the confederation." For America his three 
 " hobbies," as he called them, were the closer federal union, 
 the alliance with France, and the abolition of slavery. He 
 embarked for his native land " fraught with affection to Amer- 
 ica, and disposed to render it every possible service." f To 
 Washington he announced from Europe that he was about to 
 attempt the relief of the protestants in France, ij: 
 
 The conversation of Washington during his stay in Bich- 
 mond had still further impressed members of the legislature 
 with the magnitude of his designs. Shortly after his de- 
 
 * Harrison to Washington, 13 November 1784. Sparks, ix., 68. 
 f Jefferson to Madison, 18 March 1785. 
 X Lafayette to Washington, 11 May 1785. 
 
128 ON" THE WAY TO A FEDEEAL CONYENTIOK b.ii.; OH.m. 
 
 parture a joint memorial from inhabitants of Maryland and of 
 Yirginia, representing the advantages whicli would flow from 
 establishing under the authority of the two states a company 
 for improving the navigation of the Potomac, was presented 
 to the general assembly of each of them. But the proposed 
 plan had defects, and, moreover, previous communication be- 
 t v^een the two states could alone secure uniformity of action. 
 It was decided to consult with Maryland, and the negotiation 
 was committed to Washington himself. Leaving Mount Yer- 
 non on the fourteenth of December 1Y84 at a few hours' notice, 
 the general hastened to Annapolis. Amendments of the plan 
 were thoughtfully digested, rapidly carried through both houses, 
 and dispatched to Richmond. There a law of the same tenor 
 Avas immediately passed * without opposition, " to the mutual 
 satisfaction of both states," and, as Washington hoped, "to the 
 advantage of the union." f 
 
 At the same time the two governments made appropria- 
 tions for opening a road from the highest practicable naviga- 
 tion of the Potomac to that of the river Cheat or Monongahela, 
 and they concurred in an application to Pennsylvania for per- 
 mission to open another road from Fort Cumberland to the 
 Yohogany. Like measures were initiated by Yirginia for con- 
 necting James river with some affluent of the Great Kanawha. 
 Moreover, the executive was authorized to appoint commis- 
 sioners to examine the most convenient course for a canal be- 
 tween Elizabeth river and the waters of the Roanoke, and 
 contingently to make application to the legislature of ]^orth 
 Carolina for its concurrence. J 
 
 Early in 1785 the legislature of Yirginia, repeating, in 
 words written by Madison, "their sense of the unexampled 
 merits of George "Washington toward his country," vested in 
 him shares in both the companies alike of the Potomac and of 
 James river.* But, conscious of the weight of his counsels, 
 he never suffered his influence to be impaired by any suspicion 
 of interested motives, and, not able to undo an act of the legis- 
 lature, held the shares, but only as a trustee for the public. 
 
 * Hening, x., 510. f Madison, i., 123, 124. Sparks, ix., 82. 
 I Washington to R. H. Lee, 8 February 1785. Sparks, ix., 91. 
 
 * Hening, xi., 525, 526. 
 
1785. THE WEST. 129 
 
 Anotlier question between Maryland and Yirginia remained 
 for solution. The cliarter to Lord Baltimore, which Yirginia 
 had resisted as a severance of her territory, bounded his juris- 
 diction by the " further bank " of the Potomac. When both 
 states assumed independence, Virginia welcomed her northern 
 neighbor to the common war for liberty by releasing every 
 claim to its territory, but she reserved the navigation of the 
 border stream. To define with exactness their respective rights 
 on its waters, the Virginia legislature, in June 1784, led the 
 way by naming George Mason, Edmund Randolph, Madison, 
 and Alexander Henderson as their commissioners to frame, 
 " in concert with commissioners of Maryland, liberal, equitable, 
 and mutually advantageous regulations touching the jurisdic- 
 tion and navigation of the river." * Maryland gladly accepted 
 the invitation, and in the following March the joint commission 
 was to meet at Alexandria, hard by Mount Vernon. In this 
 manner, through the acts and appropriations of the legislature 
 of Virginia, Washington connected the interests and hopes of 
 her people with the largest and noblest conceptions, and to the 
 states alike on her southern and her northern border and to the 
 rising empire in the West, where she would surely meet ll^ew 
 York and IMew England, she gave the weightiest pledges of 
 inviolable attachment to the union. To carry forward these 
 designs, the next step must be taken by congress, which should 
 have met at Trenton on the first day of ISTovember 1Y84, but, 
 from tlie tardy arrival of its members, was not organized until 
 the thirtieth. It was the rule of congress that its president 
 should be chosen in succession from each one of the different 
 states. Beginning with Virginia, it had proceeded through 
 them all except ITew Hampshire, Rhode Island, I^orth Caro- 
 lina, and Georgia. But now the rule, which in itself was a bad 
 one, was broken,f and Richard Henry Lee was elected presi- 
 dent. The rule of rotation was never again followed ; but 
 this want of fidelity to a custom that had long been respected 
 tended to increase the jealousy of the small states. Before 
 Christmas and before finishing any important business, con- 
 gress, not finding sufficient accommodations in Trenton, ad- 
 
 * Journals of House of Delegates for 28 June 1784. 
 f Madison, i., 117. Otto to Vergeunes, 15 June 1786. MS. 
 VOL. yi. — 9 
 
130 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION", b.ii.; oh. m. 
 
 journed to the eleventh of January 1Y85, and to ISTew York as 
 its abode. 
 
 Congress had put at its head the most determined and the 
 most restlessly indefatigable opponent of any change whatever 
 in the articles of confederation. Lee renewed intimate relations 
 with Gerry, the leading member of congress from Massachu- 
 setts. He sought to revive his earlier influence in Boston 
 through Samuel Adams. The venerable patriot shared his 
 jealousy of conferring too great powers on a body far removed 
 from its constituents, but had always supported a strict enforce- 
 ment of the just authority of government, and he replied : 
 " Better it would have been for us to have fallen in our highly 
 famed struggle for our rights than now to become a contempt- 
 ible nation." * 
 
 The harbor at the mouth of the Hudson was at that time 
 the most convenient port of entry for 'New Jersey and Connecti- 
 cut, and the State of JSTew York, through its custom-house, 
 levied on their inhabitants as well as on its own an ever in- 
 creasing revenue by imposts. The collector was a stubborn 
 partisan. The last legislature had elected to the fifth congress 
 Jay, Robert R. Livingston, Egbert Benson, and Lansing, of 
 whom, even, after Jay became the minister for foreign affairs, 
 a majority favored the founding of a nation. But the opinions 
 of the president of congress, yAio was respected as one of the 
 most illustrious statesmen of Virginia, assisted to bring about 
 a revolution in the politics of New York.f On the nineteenth 
 of March 1785 its legislature appointed three " additional dele- 
 gates" to congress, of whom Haring and Melancton Smith, 
 like Lansing, opposed federal measures ; and for tlie next four 
 years the state of ISTew York obstinately resisted a thorough 
 revision of the constitution. Of the city of New York, the 
 aspirations for a national union could not be repressed. 
 
 On the fourteenth of December 1784, soon after the organi- 
 zation of congress, Washington, with a careful discrimination 
 between the office of that body and the functions of the states, 
 urged through its president that congress should have the 
 western waters well explored, their capacities for navigation 
 
 * S. Adams to R. H. Lee, 23 December 1784. 
 
 f Jay to Washington, 27 Jane 17S6. Letters to Washington, iv., 136. 
 
1785. THE WEST. 131 
 
 ascertained as far as the communications between Lake Erie 
 and the Wabash, and between Lake Michigan and the Missis- 
 sippi, and a complete and perfect map made of the country at 
 least as far west as the Miamis, which run into the Ohio and 
 Lake Erie. And he pointed out the Miami village as the place 
 for a Yerj important post for the union. The expense attending 
 such an undertaking could not be great ; the advantages would 
 be unbounded. " Nature," he said, " has made such a display 
 of her bounty in those regions that the more the country is 
 explored the more it Avill rise in estimation. The spirit of 
 emigration is great ; people have got impatient ; and, though 
 you cannot stop the road, it is yet in your power to mark 
 the way. A little while and you will not be able to do 
 either." *'^* 
 
 In the same week in which the legislature of 'New York 
 reversed its position on national policy, Washington renewed 
 his admonitions to Lee on planting the western territory. 
 " The mission of congress will now be to fix a medium price 
 on these lands and to point out the most advantageous mode of 
 seating them, so that law and good government may be admin- 
 istered, and the union strengthened and supported. Pro- 
 gressive seating is the only means by which this can be 
 effected ; " and, resisting the politicians who might wish to 
 balance northern states by southern, he insisted that to mark 
 out but one new state would better advance the public welfare 
 than to mark out ten. f 
 
 On the eleventh of March William Grayson took his seat 
 for the first time as a member of congress. He had been edu- 
 cated in England at Oxford, and had resided at the Temple in 
 London. His short career furnishes only glimpses of his 
 character. In 1776 he had been an aide-de-camp to Washing- 
 ton, with whom he kept up affectionate relations ; in 1777 he 
 commanded a Yirginia regiment and gained honors at Mon- 
 mouth. His private life appears to have been faultless ; his 
 public acts show independence, courage, and a humane and 
 noble nature. In the state legislature of the previous winter 
 he was chairman of the committee to which Washington's re- 
 
 * Washington to R. H. Lee, 14 December 1'784. Sparks, ix., 80, 8L 
 f Vv^ashington to U. H. Lee, 15 March 1785. 
 
132 Oj^ the way to A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; on. m. 
 
 port on the negotiations with Maryland had been referred.* 
 The first evidence of his arrival in 'New York is a letter of the 
 tenth of March 1785, to his former chief, announcing that 
 Jefferson's ordinance for disposing of western lands, which 
 had had its first reading in May 1784, had been brought once 
 more before congress. 
 
 ]^ot Washington alone had reminded congress of its duties 
 to the West. Informed by Gerry of the course of public 
 business, Timothy Pickering, from Philadelphia, addressed 
 most earnest letters to Pufus King. He compkined that no 
 reservation of land was made for the support of ministers of 
 the gospel, nor even for schools and academies, and he further 
 wrote : " Congress once made this important declaration, ^ that 
 all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their 
 Creator with certain unalienable rights ; that among these are 
 life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ' ; and these truths 
 were held to be self-evident. To suffer the continuance of 
 slaves till they can gradually be emancipated, in states already 
 overrun with them, may be pardonable because unavoidable 
 without hazarding greater evils ; but to introduce them into 
 countries where none now exist can never be forgiven. For 
 God's sake, then, let one more effort be made to prevent so 
 terrible a calamity ! The fundamental constitutions for those 
 states are yet liable to alterations, and this is probably the only 
 time when the evil can certainly be prevented." I^or would 
 Pickering harbor the thought of delay in the exclusion of 
 slavery. " It will be infinitely easier," he said, " to prevent 
 the evil at first than to eradicate it or check it in any future 
 time." f 
 
 The sixteenth of March wa*s fixed for the discussion of the 
 affairs of the West. The report that was before congress was 
 Jefferson's scheme for " locating and disposing of land in the 
 western territory ; " and it was readily referred to a committee 
 of one from each state, Grayson being the member from Vir- 
 ginia and King from Massachusetts. King, seconded by EUery 
 of Rhode Island, proposed that a part of the rejected anti- 
 slavery clause in Jefferson's ordinance for the government of 
 
 * Journals Yirginia House of Delegates, 99. 
 
 f Pickering to King, 8 March 1785. Pickering's Pickering, i., 509, 510. 
 
1785. THE WEST. I33 
 
 the western territory should be referred to a committee ; * all 
 that related to the western territory of the three southern 
 states was omitted ; and so, too, was the clause postponing the 
 prohibition of slavery. 
 
 On the question for committing this proposition, the four 
 E'ew England states, JSTew York, 'New Jersey, and Pennsylva- 
 nia, voted unanimously in the affirmative ; Maryland by a ma- 
 jority, McHenry going with the South, John Henry and Will- 
 iam Hindman with the North. For Virginia, Grayson voted 
 aye, but was overpowered by Hardy and Richard Henry Lee. 
 The two Carolinas were unanimous for the negative. Houston 
 of Georgia answered no, but being on that day the sole repre- 
 sentative of Georgia, his vote was not counted. So the vote 
 stood eight states against three; eighteen members against 
 eight ;f and the motion was forthwith committed to King, 
 Howell, and Ellery. :j: 
 
 On the sixth of April, King from his committee reported 
 his resolution, which is entirely in his own handwriting,* and 
 which consists of two clauses : it allowed slavery in the ITorth- 
 west until the first day of the year 1801, but no longer ; and it 
 " provided that always, upon the escape of any person into any 
 of the states described in the resolve of congress of the twenty- 
 third day of April 1784, from whom labor or service is lawfully 
 claimed in any one of the thirteen original states, such fugitive 
 might be lawfully reclaimed and carried back to the person 
 claiming his labor or service, this resolve notwithstanding." |j 
 
 * The original motion of Rufus King for the reference, in his handwriting, is 
 preserved in Papers of Old Congress, vol, xxxi. 
 
 f Journals of Congress, iv., 481, 482. 
 
 X It is indorsed in the handwriting of Charles Thomson : " Motion for pre- 
 venting slavery in new states, 16 March IVSS. Referred to Mr. King, Mr. Howell, 
 Mr. Ellery." 
 
 * It is to be found in Papers of Old Congress, xxxi., 329, and is indorsed in 
 the handwriting of Rufus King : " Report on Mr. King's motion for the exclusion 
 of slavery in the new states." And it is further indorsed in the handwriting of 
 Charles Thomson: "Mr. King, Mr. Howell, Mr. Ellery. Entered 6 April 1785, 
 read. Thursday, April 14, assigned for consideration." 
 
 I The printed copy of this report of King is to be found in Papers of Old 
 Congress, xxxi., 331, and is indorsed in the handwriting of Charles Thomson: 
 " To prevent slavery in the new states. Included in substance in the ordinance 
 for a temporary government passed the 13 July ITST." 
 
134 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; cn.m. 
 
 King reserved his resolution to be brought forward as a sepa- 
 rate measure, after the land ordinance should be passed. " I 
 expect," wrote Grayson to Madison, "seven states may be 
 found liberal enough to adopt it ;" * but there is no evidence 
 that it was ever again called up in that congress. 
 
 On the twelfth of April f the committee for framing an 
 ordinance for the disposal of the western lands made their re- 
 port. It was written by Grayson, :j: who formed it out of a 
 conflict of opinions, and took the chief part in conducting it 
 through the house. As an inducement for neighborhoods of 
 the same religious sentiments to confederate for the purpose 
 of purchasing and settling together, it was a land law for a 
 people going forth to take possession of a seemingly endless 
 domain. Its division was to be into townships, with a ]3er- 
 petual reservation of one mile scpiare in every township for 
 the support of religion, and another for education. The 
 house refused its assent to the reservation for the support of 
 religion, as connecting the church with the state ; but the 
 reservation for the support of schools received a general wel- 
 come. Jefferson had proposed townships of ten miles square ; 
 the committee, of seven ; but the motion of Grayson, that they 
 should be of six miles square,* was finally accepted. The 
 South, accustomed to the mode of indiscriminate locations and 
 settlements, insisted on the rule which would give the most 
 free scope to the roving emigrant ; and, as the bill required 
 the vote of nine states for adoption, and during the debates on 
 the subject more than ten were never present, the eastern 
 people, though " amazingly attached to their own custom of 
 planting by townships," yielded to the compromise that every 
 other township should be sold by sections. || The surveys were 
 to be confined to one state and to five ranges, extending from 
 the Ohio to Lake Erie, and were to be made under the direc- 
 tion of the geographer of the United States. The bounds of 
 
 * Grayson to Madison, 1 May 17S5. The ordinance for the sale of lands re- 
 quired the consent of nine states ; the regulative ordinance, of but seven. 
 
 f Grayson to Washington, 15 April 1785. 
 
 X The original report in the handwriting of Grayson is preserved in the Papers 
 of Old Congress, Ivi., 451. 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv., 512. | Grayson to Madison, 1 May 1785. 
 
1785. THE WEST. 135 
 
 every parcel that was sold were fixed beyond a question ; the 
 mode of registry was simple, convenient, and almost without 
 cost ; the form of conveyance most concise and clear. JSTever 
 was land offered to a poor man at less cost or with a safer title. 
 For one bad provision, which, however, was three years after 
 repealed, the consent of congress was for the moment extorted ; 
 the lands, as surveyed, were to be drawn for by lot by the sev- 
 eral states in proportion to the requisitions made upon them, 
 and were to be sold publicly within the states. But it was 
 carefully provided that they should be paid for in the obliga- 
 tions of the United States, at the rate of a dollar an acre. To 
 secure the promises made to Virginia, chieily on behalf of the 
 ofiicers and soldiers who took part in conquering the North- 
 west from British authority, it was agreed, after a discussion 
 of four days,* to reserve the district between the Little Miami 
 and the Scioto. 
 
 The land ordinance of Jefferson, as amended from 1784 to 
 1Y88, definitively settled the character of the national land 
 laws, which are still treasured up as one of the most precious 
 heritages from the founders of the republic. 
 
 The frontier settlements at the west needed the protection 
 of a military force. In 1784, soon after the exchange of the 
 ratifications of peace, Gerry at Annapolis protested against 
 the right of congress on its own authority to raise standing 
 armies or even a few armed men in time of peace. His con- 
 duct was approved by his state, wliose'||ielegation was in- 
 structed to oppose and protest on all occasions against the 
 exercise of the power. From that time congress had done no 
 more than recommend the states to raise troops. • It was now 
 thought necessary to raise seven hundred men to protect the 
 "West. The recommendation should have been proportioned 
 among all the states ; but congress ventured to call only on 
 Connecticut, ISTew York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania as the 
 states most conveniently situated to furnish troops who were 
 to be formed into one regiment and for three years guard the 
 north-western frontiers and the public stores. 
 
 * Grayson to Madison, 1 May 1785. 
 
136 01!T THE WAY TO A FEDERAL OONVEN"TION. b.il; on.iy. 
 
 CHAPTER lY. 
 
 THE KEGULATION OF COMMEECE. THE FIFTH CONGKESS. 
 
 1784-1785. 
 
 The legislature of Connecticut in 1783, angrj at the grant 
 of half pay to the officers of the army, insisted that the requi- 
 sitions of congress had no validity until they received the 
 approval of the state. But the vote was only " a fire among 
 the brambles;" and the people at the next election chose a 
 ; legislature which accepted the general impost on commerce, 
 even though it should be assented to by no more than twelve 
 states.* The Yirginia assembly of that year discountenanced 
 the deviation from the rule of unanimity as a dangerous pre- 
 cedent ; f but it was adopted by Maryland. J 
 
 In the following winter I^oah Webster of Hartford busied 
 himself in the search for a form of a continental government 
 which should act as efficaciously on its members as a local gov- 
 ernment. " So long as any individual state has power to de- 
 feat the measures of the other twelve, our pretended union," 
 so he expressed the opinion which began to prevail, " is but a 
 name, and our confederation a cobweb. The sovereignty of 
 each state ought not to be abridged in any article relating to 
 its own government ; in a matter that equally resjDects all the 
 states, a majority of the states must decide. We cannot and 
 ought not to divest ourselves of provincial attachments, but 
 we should subordinate them to the general interest of the con- 
 
 * Jlonroe to Madison, 14 December 1784. 
 
 f Madison to Monroe, 24 December 1784. Madison, i,, 114, 115. 
 X Act of Maryland. Session of 1784, 1785. In Pennsylvania Packet of 8 
 February 1785. 
 
1784-'5. KEGULATIOX OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. 137 
 
 tinent ; as a citizen of the American empire, every individual 
 has a national interest far superior to all others." * 
 
 The outlays in America of the British in the last year of 
 their occupation of New York, and the previous expenditures 
 for the French army, had supplied the northern states with 
 specie ; so that purchasers were found for the bills of Robert 
 Morris on Europe, which were sold at a discount of twenty or 
 even forty per cent.f The prospect of enormous gains tempted 
 American merchants to import in one year more than their 
 exports could pay for in three ; :J: while factors of English 
 houses, bringing over British goods on British account, jostled 
 the American merchants in their own streets. Fires which 
 still bum were then lighted. He that will trace the American 
 policy of that day to its cause must look to British restrictions 
 and British protective duties suddenly applied to Americans 
 as aliens. 
 
 The people had looked for peace and prosperity to come 
 hand in hand, and, when hostilities ceased, they ran into debt 
 for English goods, never doubting that their wonted industries 
 would yield them the means of payment as of old. But ex- 
 cessive importations at low prices crushed domestic manufac- 
 tures ; trade with the British West Indies was obstructed ; 
 neither rice, tobacco, pitch, turpentine, nor ships could be re- 
 mitted as heretofore. The whale fishery of Massachusetts had 
 brought to its mariners in a year more than eight hundred 
 thousand dollars in specie, the clear gain* of perilous labor. 
 The export of their oil was now obstructed by a duty in Eng- 
 land of ninety dollars the ton. Importations from England 
 must be paid for chiefly by cash and bills of exchange. The 
 Americans had' chosen to be aliens to England ; they could not 
 complain of being taxed like aliens, but they awoke to demand 
 powers of retaliation. 
 
 The country began to be in earnest as it summoned con- 
 gress to change its barren discussions for efficient remedies. 
 The ever increasing voice of complaint broke out from the 
 impatient commercial towns of the northern and central states. 
 
 * Sketches of American Policy by Noah Webster, pp. 32-38. 
 f Pclatiah Webster's Essays, Edition 1791, 266, 267, note. 
 X E. Bancroft to \Y. Erazer, 8 November 1783. 
 
138 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; ch. iv. 
 
 On the eleventli of Jannarj 1785, the day on wliicli congress 
 established itself in !New York, the artificers, tradesmen, and 
 mechanics of that city, as they gave it a welcome, added these 
 brave words : " We hope our representatives will coincide with 
 the other states in angmeiiting your power to every exigency 
 of the union." * The JSTew York chamber of commerce in 
 like manner entreated it to make the commerce of the United 
 States one of the first objects of its care, and to counteract the 
 injurious restrictions of foreign nations, f The New York 
 legislature, then in session, imposed a double duty on all goods 
 imported in British bottoms. :j: 
 
 On the twenty-second of March 1785 a bill to "protect 
 the manufactures " of Pennsylvania by specific or ad valorem 
 duties on more than seventy articles, among them on manufac- 
 tures of iron and steel, was read in its assembly for the second 
 time, debated by paragraphs, and then ordered to be printed 
 for public consideration.* The citizens of Philadelphia, re- 
 calling the usages of the revolution, on the second of June 
 held a town-meeting ; and, after the deliberations of their com- 
 mittee for eighteen days, they declared that relief from the 
 oppressions under which the American trade and manufac- 
 tures languished could spring only from the grant to congress 
 of full constitutional powers over the commerce of the United 
 States; that foreign manufactures interfering with domestic 
 industry ought to be discouraged by prohibitions or protective 
 duties. They raised a committee to lay their resolutions in the 
 form of a petition before their own assembly, and to correspond 
 with committees appointed elsewhere for similar purposes. On 
 the twentieth of September, after the bill of the Pennsylvania 
 legislature had been nearly six months under consideration by 
 the people, and after it had been amended by an increase of 
 duties, especially on manufactures of iron, and by a discriminat- 
 ing tonnage duty on ships of nations having no treaty of com- 
 merce with congress, it became a law || with general acclamation. 
 
 * MS. vol. of Eemonstranccs and Addresses, 343. 
 f MS. vol. of Remonstrances and Addresses, 351. 
 
 :f: Chief Justice Smith's extract of letters from New York. MS. 
 
 * Pennsylvania Packet, 18 May 1785. 
 
 jl The Act appears in full in Pennsylvania Packet of 22 September 1785. 
 Van Berckel's report to the States-General, 4 October 1785. 
 
1785. REGULATION" OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. I39 
 
 Pennsylvania liad been cheered on its way by voices from 
 Boston. On tlie eighteenth of April the merchants and trades- 
 men of that town, meeting in Faneuil Hall, established a com- 
 mittee of correspondence with merchants of other towns, 
 bound themselves not to buy British goods of resident British 
 factors, and prayed congress for the needed immediate relief.* 
 Their petition was reserved by congress for consideration when 
 the report of its committee on commerce should be taken up. 
 The movement in Boston penetrated every class of its citizens ; 
 its artisans and mechanics joined the merchants and tradesmen 
 in condemning the ruinous excess of British importations. To 
 these proceedings Grayson directed the attention of Madison.f 
 
 On the tenth of May the town of Boston elected its repre- 
 sentatives to the general court, among them Hancock, vdiose 
 health had not permitted him to be a candidate for the place 
 of governor. Two years before, Boston, in its mandate to the 
 men of its choice, had, in extreme language, vindicated the 
 absolute sovereignty of the state ; the town, no longer wedded 
 to the pride of independence, instructed its representatives in 
 this wise : Peace has not brought back prosperity ; foreigners 
 monopolize our commerce ; the American carrying trade and 
 the American finances are threatened with annihilation ; the 
 government should encourage agriculture, protect manufac- 
 tures, and establish a public revenue ; the confederacy is inade- 
 quate to its purposes ; congress should be invested with power 
 competent to the wants of the country; the legislature of 
 Massachusetts should request the executive to oj^en a corre- 
 spondence with the governors of all the states ; from national 
 unanimity and national exertion we have derived cur free- 
 dom ; the joint action of the several parts of the union can 
 alone restore happiness and security. :j: 
 
 ISTo candidate for the office of governor of Massachusetts 
 having for that year received a majority of the votes of the 
 people, the general court, in May 1785, made choice of 
 James Bowdoin, a veteran statesman who thirty years before 
 had distinguished himself in the legislature by a speech in 
 favor of the union of the colonies. He had led one branch of 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv., 516, 517. f Grayson to lladison, 1 May 1785. 
 
 :j: Boston Town Records. MS. 
 
140 OK THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; oh.iv. 
 
 the government in its resistance to British usurpations ; and, 
 when hostilities broke out, he served his native state as presi- 
 dent of its supreme executive council till the British were 
 driven from the commonwealth. His long years of public ser- 
 vice had established his fame for moderation, courage, consist- 
 ency, and uprightness. A republican at heart, he had had an 
 important share in framing the constitution of Massachusetts. 
 In his inaugural address he scorned to complain of the restrict- 
 ive policy of England, saying rather : Britain and other na- 
 tions have an undoubted right to regulate their trade with us ; 
 and the United States have an equal right to regulate ours with 
 them, j Congress should be vested with all the powers neces- 
 sary to preserve the union, manage its general concerns, and 
 promote the common interest. For the commercial inter- 
 course with foreign nations the confederation does not suffi- 
 ciently provide. " This matter," these were his words, " mer- 
 its your particular attention ; if you think that congress should 
 be vested with ampler powers, and that special delegates should 
 be convened to settle and define them, you will take measures 
 for such a convention, whose agreement, when confirmed by 
 the states, would ascertain those powers." 
 
 In reply, the two branches of the legislature jointly pledged 
 " their most earnest endeavor " to establish " the federal gov- 
 ernment on a firm basis, and to perfect the union ; " and on the 
 first day of July the general court united in the following 
 resolve : " The present powers of the congress of the United 
 States, as contained in the articles of confederation, are not 
 fully adequate to the great purposes they were originally de- 
 signed to eifect." * 
 
 That the want of adequate powers in the federal govern- 
 ment might find a remedy as soon as possible, they sent to the 
 president of congress, through their own delegation, the reso- 
 lution which they had adopted, with a circular letter to be 
 forwarded by him to the supreme executive of each state ; and 
 they further " directed the delegates of the state to take the 
 earliest opportunity of laying them before congress, and mak- 
 ing every exertion to carry the object of them into effect." f 
 
 * Massachusetts Repolve, Ixxvi., in Resolves, July 1*785, 38, 39. 
 f Massachusetts Resolve, Ixxix. 
 
1785. REGULATION" OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. 141 
 
 In concert with New Hampshire, and followed bj Ehode 
 Island, they passed a navigation act forbidding exports from 
 their harbors in British bottoms, and establishing a discrimi- 
 nating tonnage duty on foreign vessels ; '^ but only as " a tem- 
 porary expedient, until a well-guarded power to regulate trade 
 shall be intrusted to congress." f Domestic manufactures were 
 protected by more than a fourfold increase of duties ; j^ and 
 " congress was requested to recommend a convention of dele- 
 gates from all the states to revise the confederation and report 
 how far it may be necessary to alter or enlarge the same, in 
 order to secure and perpetuate the primary objects of the 
 union." * 
 
 In August, the council of Pennsylvania and Dickinson, its 
 president, in a message to the general assembly, renewed the 
 recommendation adopted in that state two years before, say- 
 iug : " We again declare that further authorities ought to be 
 vested in the federal council; may the present dispositions 
 lead to as perfect an establishment as can be devised." || 
 
 To his friend Bowdoin John Adams wrote : " The Massa- 
 chusetts has often been wise and able ; but she never took a 
 deeper measure than her late navigation act. I hope she v/ill 
 persist in it even though she should be alone." "^ 
 
 The nation looked to congress for relief. In 1776 James 
 Monroe left the college of William and Mary to enter the 
 army ; when but nineteen he gained an honorable wound and 
 promotion ; and rapidly rose to the rank of colonel. Jefferson 
 in 1781 described him as a Virginian " of abilities, merit, and 
 fortune," and as " his own particular friend." {) In 1782 he 
 was of the assembly of Virginia ; and was chosen at three-and- 
 twenty a member of the executive council. In 1783 he was 
 elected to the fourth congress, and at Annapohs saw "Washing- 
 
 * Annual Register, xxvii., 356. Pennsylvania Packet of 18 July lYSS has the 
 Massachusetts act, and of 20 July that of New Hampshire. 
 
 f Bowdoin's circular of 28 July, enclosing the act. MS. 
 
 X Bradford's Massachusetts, ii., 244 ; Pennsylvania Packet, 19 July 1785, 
 
 ^ Massachusetts Pesolves, Ixxvi., 1 July 1785. Resolves of the General Court, 
 p. 38. 
 
 y Minutes of Pennsylvania Council, 25 August 1785. Colonial Records, xiv. 
 523. ^ Adams to Governor Bowdoin, 2 September 1785. MS. 
 
 ^ Jefferson to Franklin, 5 October 1781. 
 
142 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; on. iv. 
 
 ton resign his commission. Wlien Jefferson embarked for 
 France, lie remained, not the aljlest, but the most conspicuous 
 representative of Virginia on the floor of congress. He sought 
 the friendship of nearly every leading statesman of his com- 
 monwealth ; and every one seemed glad to call him a friend. 
 It V7a3 hard to say whether he was addressed with most affec- 
 tion by Jefferson or by John Marshall. His ambition made 
 him jealous of Randolph ; the jDrecedence of Madison he ac- 
 knowledged, yet not so but that he might consent to become 
 his rival. To Richard Henry Lee he turned as to one from 
 whose zeal for liberty he might seek the confirmation of hio 
 own. 
 
 Everybody in Virginia resented the restrictive policy of 
 England. Monroe, elected to the fifth congress, embarked on 
 the tide of the rising popular feeling. He was willing to in- 
 vest the confederation with a perpetual grant of power to regu- 
 late commerce ; but on condition that it should not be exer- 
 cised without the consent of nine states. He favored a revenue 
 to be derived from imports, provided that the revenue should 
 be collected under the authority and pass into the treasury of 
 the state in which it should accrue.^' 
 
 He from the first applauded the good temper and propriety, 
 of the new congress, the comprehensiveness of mind wdth 
 w^hich they attended to the public interests, and their inclina- 
 tion to the most general and liberal principles, which seemed 
 to him " really to promise great good to the union." They 
 showed the like good-will for him. On bringing forward the 
 all-important motion on commerce, they readily referred it 
 to himself as the chief of the committee, with four associates, 
 of whom Spaight from North Carolina, and Houston from 
 Georgia, represented the South ; King of Massachusetts, and 
 Johnson of Connecticut, the North. 
 
 The complaisant committee lent their names to the pro- 
 posal of Monroe, whose report was read in congress on the 
 twenty-eighth of March.f It was to be accompanied by a 
 
 ■"' Monroe to Jefferson, 14 December 1784. 
 
 f Sparks, ix., 503, gives the report in its first form ; his date, hovrever, is 
 erroneous, from a misunderstanding of a letter of Grayson, in Letters to "Washing- 
 ton, iv., 102, 103. The day on which the report was made is not certain; the day 
 
1785. EEGULATION OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. 143 
 
 letter to be addressed to the legislatures of tlie several states 
 explaining and recommending it ; and the fifth day of April 
 was assigned for its consideration. 
 
 But it was no part of Monroe's plan to press the matter for 
 a decision. "It will be best," so he wi'ote to Jefferson, "to 
 postpone this for the present ; its adoption must depend on the 
 several legislatures. It hath been brought so far without a 
 prejudice against it. If carried farther here, I fear prejudices 
 will take place. It proposes a radical change in the whole 
 system of our government. It can be carried only by thorougb 
 investigation and a conviction of every citizen that it is right. 
 The slower it moves on, therefore, in my opinion, the better." ^ 
 
 Jefferson, as he was passing through Boston on his way to 
 France, had shown pleasure at finding " the conviction grow- 
 ing strongly that nothing could preserve the confederacy unless 
 the bond of union, their common council, should be strength- 
 ened." f He now made answer to the urgent inquiries of 
 Monroe : " The interests of the states ought to be made joint 
 in every possible instance, in order to cultivate tbe idea of our 
 being one nation, and to multiply the instances in Vv^hich the 
 people shall look up to congress as their head." He approved 
 Monroe's report mthout reservation ; but wished it adopted at 
 once, " before the admission of western states." J 
 
 Months passed away, bat still the subject was not called up 
 in congress ; and the mind of Monroe as a southern statesman 
 became shaken. The confederation seemed to him at present 
 but little more than an offensive and defensive alliance, and if 
 the right to raise troops at pleasure was denied, merely a defen- 
 sive one. His report would put the commercial economy of 
 every state entirely and permanently into the hands of the 
 
 on which it "O'as read was certainly the 28th of March. The report of the commit- 
 tee is in the volume, " Reports of Committees on Increasing; the Powers of Con- 
 gress," p. 125, with a copy in print. The few corrections that have been made in 
 the copy are in the handwriting of Monroe. The State Dept. MS. copy is in- 
 dorsed : Report of Mr. Monroe, Mr. Spaight, Mr. Houston, Mr. Johnson, Mr. King. 
 See 1 1 March — to grant congress power of regulating trade. Entered — read 23 
 March 1785. Tuesday, April 5, assigned. 
 
 * Monroe to Jefferson, New York, 12 April 1'785. 
 
 f Jefferson to ^ladison, Boston, 1 July IVSI. 
 
 ^ Jefierson to Monroe, Paris, IV June 1VS5. Jefferson, i,, 847. 
 
144 0:tT THE WAY TO A FEDEEAL CONVENTIOK B.n.; cn.iv. 
 
 Tinioii ; wliicli might then protect the carrying trade, and en- 
 courage domestic industry by a tax on foreign industry. He 
 asked himself if the carrying trade would increase the wealth 
 of the South ; and he cited " a Mr. Smith on the Wealth of 
 I^ations," as having written " that the doctrine of the balance 
 of trade is a chimera." * 
 
 The southernmost states began to reason that Maryland had 
 a great commercial port, and, like Delaware, excelled in naval 
 architecture; and these, joining the seven northern states, 
 might vote to themselves the monopoly of the transport of 
 southern products. Besides, Virginia, more than any other 
 state in the union, was opposed to the slave-trade j and Vir- 
 ginia and all north of her might join in its absolute prohibi- 
 tion. The three more southern states were, therefore, unwill- 
 ing to trust a navigation act to the voice even of ten ; and in 
 his report Monroe substituted eleven states for his first pro- 
 posal of nine.f 
 
 At last, on the thirteenth and fourteenth of July, the re" 
 port was considered in a committee of the whole. It was held 
 that the regulation of trade by the union was desirable, because 
 it would open a way to encourage domestic industry by 
 imposing a tax upon foreign manufactures;' because it was 
 needed in order to secure reciprocity in commercial intercourse 
 with foreign nations ; because it would counteract external 
 commercial influence by establishing a commercial interest at 
 home ; and because it would prepare the way for a navy. 
 These ends could never be obtained unless the states should 
 act in concert, for their separate regulations would impede and 
 defeat each other. 
 
 The opponents of the measure left their cause in the hands 
 of Kichard Henry Lee, as their only spokesman ; and his ma- 
 ture age, courteous manner, skill as an orator and debater, and 
 his rank as president of congress, gave him great authority. 
 He insisted that the new grant of power would endanger pub- 
 lic liberty ; that it would be made subservient to further at- 
 tempts to enlarge the authority of the government ; that the 
 concentration of the control of commerce would put the coun- 
 try more in the power of other nations ; that the interests of 
 
 * Monroe to Jefferson, ]6 June HSS. f Monroe to Madison, 2G Julj 1785. 
 
1785. EEGULATIOX OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. 145 
 
 the North were different from the interests of the Sonth ; that 
 the regulation of trade which suited the one would not suit the 
 other ; that eight states were interested in the carrying trade, 
 and would combine together to shackle and fetter the ^ye 
 southern states, which, without having shipping of their own, 
 raised the chief staples for exportation ; and, finally, that any 
 attempt whatever at a change in the articles of confederation 
 had a tendency to weaken the union. 
 
 In these objections Lee was consistent. He pressed upon 
 Madison, vath earnest frankness, that power in congress to 
 legislate over the trade of the union would expose the five 
 staple states, from their want of ships and seamen, to a most 
 pernicious and destructive monopoly ; that even the purchase, 
 as well as the carrying, of their produce, might be at the mercy 
 of the East and the l!^orth ; and that the spirit of commerce 
 throughout the world is a spirit of avarice.* 
 
 A plan of a navigation act originated with McHenry of 
 Maryland ; but it came before congress only as a subject of 
 conversation. Nothing was done with the report of Monroe, 
 who said of it : " The longer it is delayed, the more certain is 
 its passage through the several states ultimately ; " f and his 
 committee only asked leave to sit again. " "We have nothing 
 pleasing in prospect," wrote Jacob Read to Madison ; " and, if 
 in a short time the states do not enable congress to act with 
 vigor and put the power of compulsion into the hand of the 
 union, I think it almost time to give over the form of what I 
 cannot consider as an efficient government. We want, greatly 
 want, the assistance of your abilities and experience in con- 
 gress ; one cannot help drawing comparisons between the lan- 
 guage of 1783 and 1785." J 
 
 From the delegation of Yirginia no hope could spring; 
 but the state which exceeded all others in the number of its 
 freemen and in age was second only to the Old Dominion, had 
 directed its delegates to present to congress, and through con- 
 gress to the states, an invitation to meet in a convention and 
 
 * R. n. Lee to Madison, 11 August lYSS. Rives, ii., 31, 32. Compare Monroe 
 to Madison, 26 July 1785. 
 
 \ Monroe to Jefferson, 15 August IVSS. 
 
 :J: Jacob Read of South Carolina to Madison, 29 August 1785. 
 
 YOL. VI. — 10 
 
146 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONYENTIOK n. n. ; oh. it. 
 
 revise the confederation. And now Gerrj, Holten, and Rufus 
 King saw fit to disobey their instmctions, and suppressed the 
 acts and resolves of Massachusetts, writing ; " Any alteration 
 of the confederation is premature ; the grant of commercial 
 power should be temporary, like the proposed treaties with 
 European powers ; and for its adoption should depend on an 
 experience of its beneficial results. Power over commerce, 
 once delegated to the confederation, can never be revoked but 
 by the unanimous consent of the states. To seek a reform 
 through a convention is a violation of the rights of congress, 
 and, as a manifestation of a want of confidence in them, must 
 meet their disapprobation. A further question arises whether 
 the convention should revise the constitution generally or only 
 for express purposes. Each of the states in forming its own^ 
 as well as the federal constitution, has adopted republican prin- 
 ciples ; yet plans have been laid which would have changed 
 our republican government into baleful aristocracies. The 
 same sj)irit remains in their abettors. The institution of the 
 Cincinnati will have the same tendency. The rotation of mem- 
 bers is the best check to corruption. The requirement of the 
 unanimous consent of the legislatures of the states for altering 
 the confederation effectually prevents innovations by intrigue 
 or surprise. The cry for more power in congress comes espe- 
 cially from those whose views are extended to an aristocracy 
 that will afEord lucrative employments, civil and military, and 
 require a standing army, pensioners, and placemen. The pres- 
 ent confederation is preferable to the risk of general dissen- 
 sions and animosities." * 
 
 Bowdoin replied : " If in the union discordant principles 
 make it hazardous to intrust congress with powers necessary to 
 its well-being, the union cannot long subsist." f Gerry and 
 King rejoined: "The best and surest mode of obtaining an 
 addition to the powers of congress is to make the powers tem- 
 porary in the first instance. If a convention of the states is 
 necessary, its members should be confined to the revision of 
 
 * Tills paper, and a letter which preceded it of 18 August 1785, I found only 
 as copied into the Letter Book in the office of the Secretary of State of Massa- 
 chusetts, Letter Book, viii., 204, 205, 210-213. 
 
 f Bowdoia to Massachusetts Delegates in Congress, 24 October 1'7&5. 
 
1785. EEGULATICN OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. 147 
 
 such parts of the confederation as are supposed defective ; and 
 not intrusted with a general revision of the articles and the 
 right to report a plan of federal government essentially differ- 
 ent from the republican form now administered." * 
 
 These letters of Gerry and King met with the concurrence 
 of Samuel Adaras,f and had so much weight with the general 
 court as to stay its further action. Nor did the evil end there. 
 All the arOTments and insinuations aorainst a new constitution 
 as sure to supersede republican government by a corrupt and 
 wastef q1 aristocracy, were carried into every village in Massa- 
 chusetts, as the persistent judgment of their representatives in 
 congress with the assent of the home legislature. 
 
 It remained to see if anything could come from negotia- 
 tions in Europe. A treaty with England was in importance 
 paramount to all others. In ITS 3 Adams with Jay had crossed 
 the channel to England, but had been received with coldness. 
 The assent of the United States to the definitive treaty of 
 peace was long delayed by the difficulty of assembling in con- 
 gress nine states for its confirmation. At length, on the twelfth 
 of May 1784, the exchange of ratifications took place at Paris. 
 The way being thus opened, the three American commissioners 
 for negotiating treaties — Franklin, John Adams, and Jefferson 
 — informed the duke of Dorset, then British ambassador at 
 Paris, that they had fall powers to negotiate a commercial 
 treaty with Great Britain, and for that end were ready to repair 
 to London. The British government consulted the English 
 merchants trading with North America ; and near the end of 
 March of the following year the duke answered : " I have 
 been instructed to learn from you, gentlemen, what is the real 
 nature of the powei's with which you are invested ; whether 
 you are merely commissioned by congress, or have received 
 separate powers from the separate states. The apparent deter- 
 mination of the respective states to regulate their own separate 
 interests renders it absolutely necessary, toward forming a per- 
 manent system of commerce, that my court should be inf ornied 
 how far the commissioners can be duly authorized to enter into 
 
 * Gerry and King to Governor Bowdoin, 2 November 1785. 
 f Adams to Gerry, 19 September 1785, in reply to a letter from Gerry of 5 
 September. 
 
148 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; ch.iv. 
 
 any engagements with Great Britain, wliicli it may not be in 
 the power of any one of the states to render totally fruitless 
 and ineffectual.'' 
 
 "When Franklin, taking with him the love of France,* pre- 
 pared to sail for America, congress, breaking up their trium- 
 viral commission in Europe, appointed Jefferson to be minister 
 to France, John Adams to Great Britain. Adams gave the 
 heartiest welcome to his " old friend and coadjutor," in whom 
 he found undiminished "industry, intelligence, and talents," 
 and, full of courage if not of hope, hastened to London. On 
 the first day of June Lord Carmarthen, the secretary of state, 
 presented him to the king. Delivering his credentials, he in 
 perfect sincerity declared : " I shall esteem myself the happiest 
 of men if I can be instrumental in recommending my country 
 more and more to your Majesty's royal benevolence, and of 
 restoring the old good nature and the old good humor between 
 people who, though separated by an ocean and under different 
 governments, have the same language, a similar religion, and 
 kindred blood." 
 
 The king answered with more tremor than the bold repub- 
 lican had shown : " I wish it understood in America that I 
 have done nothing in the late contest but what I thought my- 
 self indispensably bound to do by the duty which I owed to 
 my people. I will be very frank with you. I was the last to 
 consent to the separation; but, the separation having been 
 made, I have always said, as I say now, that I would be the 
 first to meet the friendship of the United States as an independ- 
 ent power. The moment I see such sentiments and language 
 as yours prevail, and a disposition to give to this country the 
 preference, that moment I shall say, let the circumstances of 
 language, religion, and blood have their natural and full ef- 
 fect." f 
 
 The suggestion of a preference by treaty was out of place. 
 The Enghsh had it without a treaty by their skill, the recipro- 
 cal confidence of the merchants of the two nations, and the 
 habits of the Americans who were accustomed only to the con- 
 sumption of British goods. But a change had come over the 
 
 * Rayneval to Franklin, 8 May 1785. Diplomatic Correspondence, ii., 47. 
 f Diplomatic Correspondence, iv., 200, 201. 
 
1785. REGULATI02^ OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. 149 
 
 spirit of England. Before the end of three years of peace, all 
 respect and regard for America were changed into bitter dis- 
 content at its independence, and a disbelief in its capacity to 
 establish a firm government. The national judgment and 
 popular voice, as expressed in pamphlets, newspapers, coffee- 
 houses, the streets, and in both houses of parliament, had 
 grown into an unchangeable determination to maintain against 
 them the navigation acts and protective duties, and neither the 
 administration nor the opposition had a thought of relaxing 
 them. Great Britain was sure of its power of attracting 
 American commerce, and believed that the American states 
 were not, and never could be, united. All this had been so 
 often affirmed by the refugees, and Englishmen had so often 
 repeated them to one another, that to argue against it was like 
 breathing against a trade wind. "I may reason till I die to 
 no purpose,"* wrote Adams; "it is unanimity in America 
 which will produce a fair treaty of commerce." Yet he pre- 
 sented to Carmarthen a draft of one, though without hope of 
 success. It rested on principles of freedom and reciprocity, 
 and the principles of the armed neutrality with regard to neu- 
 tral vessels. 
 
 Like Franklin, like Jefferson, like Madison, he was at heart 
 for free trade. " I should be sorry," said he to his friend Jef- 
 ferson, " to adopt a monopoly, but, driven to the necessity of 
 it, I would not do things by halves." f " If monopoHes and 
 exclusions are the only arms of defence against monopolies and 
 exclusions, I would venture upon them without fear of offend- 
 ing Dean Tucker or the ghost of Doctor Quesnay." "But 
 means of preserving ourselves can never be secured until con- 
 gress shall be made supreme in foreign commerce." X 
 
 On the twenty-fourth of August, when the adjournment of 
 parliament brought leisure, Adams, then fifty years of age, met 
 the youthful prime minister of Britain. Pitt, as any one may 
 see in his portrait at Kensington, had in his nature far more of 
 his mother than of the great Englishman who was his father. 
 He had pride, but suffered from a feebleness of will which left 
 
 * Adams to Jay, 26 June 1785. Works, viii., 2l&. 
 
 \ Adams to Jefferson, V August 1785. Works, -viii., 292. 
 
 X Adams to John Jay, 10 August, ibid., 299, 300. 
 
150 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; oh.iv. 
 
 him the prej of inferior men. His own chosen measures were 
 noble ones — peace, commercial relations with France, the im- 
 provement of the public finances, the payment of the national 
 debt. In the ministry of Shelburne, he had brought in a bill 
 to promote commerce with America by modifjdng the naviga- 
 tion act ; in his own lie abandoned the hopeless attem]3t. 
 
 Reverting to the treaty of commerce which Adams had 
 proposed, Pitt asked : ^' What are the lowest terms which will 
 content America ? " Adams replied that the project he had 
 communicated would secure the friendship of the United States 
 and all the best part of their trade ; the public mind of Amer- 
 ica is balancing between free trade and a navigation act ; and 
 the question will be decided now by England; but if the 
 Americans are driven to a navigation act, they will become 
 attached to the system. " The United States," answered Pitt, 
 " are forever become a foreign nation ; our navigation act would 
 not answer its end if we should dispense with it toward you." 
 " The end of the navigation act," replied Adams, " was to con- 
 fine the commerce of the colonies to the mother country ; if 
 carried into execution against us, now that we are become in- 
 dependent, instead of confining our trade to Great Britain, it 
 will drive it to other countries." " You allow we have a right 
 to impose on you our navigation act," said Pitt. " Certainly," 
 answered Adams, " and you will allow we have a correspond- 
 ing right." " You cannot blame Englishmen," said Pitt, "for 
 being attached to their ships and seamen." " Indeed, I do 
 not," answered Adams ; " nor can you blame Americans for 
 being attached to theirs." Pitt then asked plainly : " Can yon 
 grant by treaty to England advantages which would not be- 
 come immediately the right of France ? " " We cannot," an- 
 swered Adams : " to the advantage granted to England with- 
 out a compensation France w^ould be entitled without a com- 
 pensation ; if an equivalent is stipulated for, France, to claim 
 it, must allow us the same equivalent." Pitt then put the ques- 
 tion : " What do you think that Great Britain ought to do ? " 
 And Adams answered : " This country ought to prescribe to 
 herself no other rule than to receive from America everything 
 she can send as a remittance ; in which case America wiU take 
 as much of British productions as she can pay for." 
 
1785. REGULATI0:N' of commerce, fifth congress. 151 
 
 There were mutual complaints of failure in observing the 
 conditions of the peace. Pitt frankly declared " the carrying 
 oS. of negroes to be so clearly against the treaty that England 
 must satisfy that demand ; " but he took no step toward sat- 
 isfying it. The British government, yielding to the impor- 
 tunity of merchants, and especially of fur- traders, kept posses- 
 sion of the American posts at the West. This was a con- 
 tinuance of war ; but Pitt excused it on the ground that, in 
 Virginia and at least two other states, hindrances still remained 
 in the way of British creditors. Congress was sincere in its 
 efforts to obtain for them relief in the courts of the states ; but 
 it wanted power to enforce its requisitions. Moreover, the 
 Yirginia legislature, not without a ground of equity, delayed 
 judgment against the Yirginia debtors until an offset could be 
 made of the indemnity which Pitt liimself had owned to be 
 due to them for property carried away by the British in disre- 
 gard of the treaty of peace. The holding of the western posts 
 had no connection with this debt and no proportion to it ; for 
 the profits of the fur trade, thus secured to Great Britain, in 
 each single year very far exceeded the whole debt of which 
 the collection was postponed. 
 
 The end of the interviev/ was, that Pitt enforced the navi- 
 gation acts of England against America with unmitigated se- 
 verity. For the western posts, Haldimand, as his last act, had 
 strengthened the garrison at Oswego, and charged his suc- 
 cessor to exclude the Americans from the enormously remu- 
 nerative commerce in furs by restricting transportation on 
 the lakes to British vessels alone.* In February of the next 
 year, the British secretary of state announced that the posts 
 would be retained till justice should be done to British cred- 
 itors, t 
 
 " They mean," wrote Adams, " that Americans should have 
 no ships, nor sailors, to annoy their trade." " Patience will do 
 no good ; nothing but reciprocal prohibitions and imposts will 
 have any effect." He counselled the United States as their 
 only reso irce to confine their exports to their own shij)S and 
 
 * Haldimand to St. Loger, November 1YS4 ; Sidney to St. Leger, 30 April ITSS, 
 and other letters of the like tenor. 
 
 f Carmarthen to Adams, 28 February 1786. 
 
152 ON" THE WAY TO A FEDERAL C0NVENTI02T. b.ii.; ch. iv. 
 
 encourage their own manufactures, though he foresaw that 
 these measures would so annoy England as in a few years to 
 bring on the danger of war. * 
 
 The French government could not be induced to change its 
 commercial system for the sake of pleasing the United States ; 
 it granted free ports ; but the Americans wanted not places of 
 deposit for their staples, but an open market. On one point 
 only did Yergennes bestow anxious attention. He feared the 
 United States might grant favors to England ; and, at the re- 
 quest of France, congress, when preparing to treat with the 
 nations of Europe, gave assurance that it would "place no 
 people on more advantageous ground than the subjects of his 
 most Christian Majesty." Through the French envoy in 
 America, Yergennes answered : " This declaration, founded 
 on the treaty of the sixth of February 1778, is very agree- 
 able to the king ; and you can assure congress that the United 
 States shall constantly experience a perfect recijDrocity in 
 France." f 
 
 Jefferson, as minister, obtained a great reduction of the 
 duty on American oil manufactured from fish ; ;}: but he was 
 compelled to hear thrice over complaints that the trade of 
 the United States had not learned the way to France ; and 
 thrice over that the French government could not depend on 
 engagements taken with the United States. Complaints, too, 
 were made of the navigation acts of Massachusetts and 'New 
 Hampshire, not without hints at retaliation. 
 
 While some of the states of Europe forgot their early zeal 
 to form commercial relations with the United States, the con- 
 vention for ten years with Frederic of Prussia, to whose dis- 
 patch, intelligence, and decision Adams bore witness, was com- 
 pleted in May 1785, and in the following May was unani- 
 mously ratified by congress. Free vessels made free goods. 
 Arms, ammunition, and military stores were taken out of the 
 class of contraband. In case of war between these two parties, 
 merchant vessels were still to pass unmolested. Privateering 
 was pronounced a form of piracy. Citizens of the one country 
 
 * Adams to Jay, 30 August and 15 October lYSS. Works, viiL, 313 and 321. 
 f Diplomatic Correspondence, ii., 33, 34, 35. 
 .•}:Ibid.,ii., 491,492. 
 
1785. REGULATION OF COMMERCE. FIFTH CONGRESS. 153 
 
 domiciled in the otlier were to enjoy freedom of conscience 
 and worship, and, in case of war between the two parties, 
 might still continue their respective employments. 
 
 Spain had anxieties with respect to its future relations with 
 America, and thought proper to accredit an agent to congress ; 
 but neither with Spain, nor with France, nor with England 
 was there the least hope of forming liberal commercial relations. 
 American diplomacy had failed ; the attempt of the fifth con- 
 gress to take charge of commerce had failed ; the movement for 
 a federal convention, which was desired by the mercantile class 
 throughout the union, had failed ; but encouragement came from 
 South Carolina. William Moultrie, its governor, gave support 
 to Bowdoin of Massachusetts, saying : " The existence of this 
 state with every other as a nation depends on the strength of 
 the union. Cemented together in one common interest, they 
 are invincible ; divided, they must fall a sacrifice to internal 
 dissensions and foreign usurpations." * The heart of American 
 statesmen beat high with hope and resolution. " It is my first 
 wish," wrote Jay, the American secretary for foreign affairs, 
 in 1785, " to see the United States assume and merit the charac- 
 ter of ONE GREAT NATioiN'." f " It has cvcr been my hobby- 
 horse," wrote John Adams early in 1786, while minister 
 of the United States in England, "to see rising in Amer- 
 ica an empire of liberty, and a prospect of two or three hun- 
 dred millions of freemen, without one noble or one king 
 among them." :j: 
 
 The confederation framed a treaty with the emperor of 
 Morocco ; it was not rich enough to buy immunity for its ships 
 from the corsair powers of Barbary. 
 
 Through congress no hope for the regeneration of the 
 union could be cherished. Before we look for the light that 
 may rise outside of that body, it will be well to narrate what 
 real or seeming obstacles to union were removed or quieted, 
 and what motives compelling the forming of a new constitu- 
 tion sprung from the impairment of the obligation of contracts 
 by the states. 
 
 * Moultrie to Bowdoin, 10 September 11S5. 
 
 f Life of John Jay by his son, i., 190. 
 
 :{: The Life and Works of John Adams, ix., 546. 
 
151- 0^ THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTIOK b.ii.: oh. v. 
 
 CIIAPTEE Y. 
 
 OBSTACLES TO U^IOIT REMOVED Olt QUIETED. 
 
 1783-1787. 
 
 The early confederacy of I^ew England, thongli all its colo- 
 nies were non-conformists, refused fellowship to Rhode Island 
 on account of its variance in dissent. Yirginia and Maryland 
 were settled in connection with the church of England, which 
 at the period of the revolution was still the established church 
 of them both. In the constitution of the Carolinas the philoso- 
 pher Locke introduced a clause for the disfranchisement of 
 the atheist, not considering that the power in the magistrate to 
 inflict a penalty on atheism implied the power which doomed 
 Socrates to drink poison and filled the catacombs of Rome 
 with the graves of martyrs. On the other hand, the Baptists, 
 nurslings of adversity, driven by persecution to find resources 
 within their ow^n souls, when they came to found a state in 
 America, rested it on the truth that the spirit and the mind 
 are not subordinate to the temporal power. For the great 
 central state, the people called Quakers in like manner affirmed 
 the right to spiritual and intellectual liberty, and denied to the 
 magistrate all control over the support of religion. To form a 
 perfect political union it was necessary, in all that relates to re- 
 ligion, that state should not be in conflict with state, and that 
 every citizen, in the exercise of his rights of intercitizenship, 
 should be at his ease in any state in which he might sojourn or 
 abide. In a repnblican country of wide extent, ideas rule legis- 
 lation; and the history of reform is the history of thought, 
 gaining strength as it passes from mind to mind, till it finds a 
 place in a statute. We have now to see how it came to pass 
 
1783-1787. OBSTACLES TO UNION" KEMOVED. 155 
 
 that tlie oldest state in the union, first in territory and in num- 
 bers, and, from its origin, the upholder of an established 
 church, renounced the support of religious worship by law, 
 and esiablished the largest liberty of conscience. 
 
 The legislature of Virginia, within a half year after the 
 declaration of independence, while it presented for public con- 
 sideration the idea of a general assessment for the support of 
 the Christian religion,"^ exempted dissenters from contributions 
 to the established church. In 1770 this exemption was ex- 
 tended to churchmen, so that the church was disestablished. 
 But the law for religious freedom, which Jefferson prepared 
 as a i^art of the revised code, was submitted to the deliberate 
 reflection of the people before the vote should be taken for its 
 adoption. 
 
 The Massachusetts constitution of 1780 compelled every 
 member of its legislature on taking his seat to subscribe a 
 declaration that he believed the Christian religion. This reg- 
 ulation Joseph Hawley, who had been elected to the first 
 senate of Massachusetts, in a letter to that body, sternly con- 
 demned. A member of the Congregational church of !North- 
 ampton, severe in his morality, and of unquestioned ortho- 
 doxy, he called to mind that the founders of Massachusetts- 
 while church membership was their condition for granting the 
 privilege of an elector, never suffered a profession of the 
 Christian religion to be made before a temporal court. More- 
 over, he held the new requirement to be against common right 
 and the natural franchises of every member of the common- 
 wealth, f In this way, from the heart of rigid Calvinism a 
 protest was heard against any right in the temporal power to 
 demand or to receive a profession of faith in the Christian re- 
 ligion. The church member was subject to no supervision but 
 of those with whom he had entered into covenant. The tem- 
 poral power might punish the evil deed, but not punish or 
 even search after the thought of the mind. 
 
 The inherent perverseness of a religious establishment, of 
 which a king residing in another part of the world and en- 
 forcing hostile political interests was the head, showed itself in 
 
 * n^'nirg, ix., 165. Jefferson's Autobiography. 
 
 f Joseph Hawley to Massachusetts Senate, 28 October 1780. 
 
156 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; oh.v. 
 
 Yirginia. The majority of the legislators were still cliurcli- 
 men ; but gradually a decided majority of the people had 
 become dissenters, of whom the foremost were Baptists and 
 Presbyterians. When the struggle for independence was ended, 
 of ninety-one clergymen of the Anglican church in Yirginia, 
 twenty-eight only remained. One fourth of the parishes had 
 become extinct. 
 
 Churchmen began to fear the enfeeblement of religion 
 from its want of compulsory support and from the excesses of 
 fanaticism among dissenters. These last had made their way, 
 not only without aid from the state, but under the burden of 
 supporting a church which was not their own. The church 
 which had leaned on the state was alone in a decline. The 
 system of an impartial support by the state of all branches of 
 Christians was revived by members of "the Protestant Episco- 
 pal church," as it now began to be called. Their petitions? 
 favored by Patrick Henry, Harrison, then governor, Pendle- 
 ton, the chancellor, Pichard Henry Lee, and many others of 
 the foremost men, alleged a decay of public morals ; and the 
 remedy ashed for was a general assessment, analogous to the 
 clause in the constitution of Massachusetts which enjoined 
 upon its towns " the maintenance of pubHc Protestant teachers 
 of piety, religion, and morality." * 
 
 The Presbyterians at first were divided. Their clergy, even 
 while they held that human legislation should concern human 
 affairs alone, that conscience and religious w^orship lie beyond 
 its reach, accepted the measure, provided it should respect 
 every human belief, even "of the Mussulman and the Gen- 
 too." The Presbyterian laity, accustomed to support their 
 own ministry, chose rather to continue to do so. Of the Bap- 
 tists, alike ministers and people rejected any alHance with the 
 state. 
 
 Early in the autumnal session of the legislature of 1785, 
 Patrick Henry proposed a resolution for a legal provision for 
 the teachers of the Christian religion. In the absence of Jeffer- 
 son, the opponents of the measure were led by Madison, whom 
 Witherspoon had imbued with theological lore. The assess- 
 ment bill, he said, exceeds the functions of civil authority. 
 
 * Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, Article III. of 1780 
 
1783-1787. OBSTACLES TO UNIOiT REMOVED. 157 
 
 The question has been stated as if it were, is religion neces- 
 sary ? The true question is, are establishments necessary for 
 religion ? And the answer is, they corrupt religion. The dif- 
 ficulty of providing for the support of religion is the result of 
 the war, to be remedied by voluntary association for religious 
 purposes. In the event of a statute for the support of the 
 Christian religion, are the courts of law to decide what is 
 Christianity ? and, as a consequence, to decide what is ortho- 
 doxy and what is heresy ? The enforced support of the Chris- 
 tian religion dishonors Christianity. Yet, in spite of all the 
 opposition that could be mustered, leave to bring in the bill 
 was granted by forty-seven votes against thirty-two.* The 
 bill, when reported, prescribed a general assessment on all tax- 
 able property for the support of teachers of the Christian re- 
 ligion. Each person, as he paid his tax, was to say to which 
 society he dedicated it ; in case he refused to do so, his pay- 
 ment was to be applied toward the maintenance of a county 
 school. On the third reading the bill received a check, and 
 was ordered by a small majority to be printed and distributed 
 for the consideration of the people. Thus the people of Vir- 
 ginia had before them for their choice the bill of the revised 
 code for establishing religious freedom, and the plan of de- 
 sponding churchmen for supporting religion by a general 
 assessment. 
 
 All the state, from the sea to the mountains and beyond 
 them, was alive with the discussion. Madison, in a remon- 
 strance addressed to the legislature, imbodied all that could be 
 said against the compulsory maintenance of Christianity and 
 in behalf of religious freedom as a natural right, the glory of 
 Christianity itself, the surest method of supporting religion, 
 and the only way to produce moderation and harmony among 
 its several sects. George Mason, who was an enthusiast for 
 entire freedom, asked of "Washington his opinion, and received 
 for answer that " no man's sentiments were more opposed to 
 any kind of restraint upon religious principles." While he 
 was not among those who were so much alarmed at the thought 
 of making people of the denominations of Christians pay to- 
 ward the support of that denomination which they professed, 
 
 * Madison to Jefferson, 9 January 1785. Madison, L, 130. 
 
158 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONYEN-TIOK b.ii.; on. v. 
 
 provided Jews, Mahometans, and others who were not Chris- 
 tians, might obtain proper relief, his advice was given in these 
 w^ords : " As the matter now stands, I wish an assessment had 
 never been agitated ; and, as it has gone so far, that the bill 
 could die an easy death." * 
 
 The general committee of the Baptists unanimously ap- 
 pointed a delegate to remonstrate with the general assembly 
 against the assessment, and they resolved that no human laws 
 ought to be established for that purpose ; that every free per- 
 son ought to be free in matters of religion, f The general 
 convention of the Presbyterian church prayed the legislature 
 expressly that the bill concerning religious freedom might be 
 passed into a law as the best safeguard then attainable for their 
 religious rights. J 
 
 When the legislature of Virginia assembled, no one was 
 willing to bring forward the assessment bill, and it was never 
 heard of more. Out of one hundred and seventeen articles of 
 the revised code which v/ere then reported, Madison selected 
 for immediate consideration the one which related to religious 
 freedom. The people of Virginia had held it under delibera- 
 tion for six years ; in December 1785 it passed the house by a 
 vote of nearly four to one. Attempts in the senate for amend- 
 ment produced only insignificant changes in the preamble, and 
 on the sixteenth of January 1786 Virginia placed among its 
 statutes the very words of the original draft by Jefferson with 
 the hope that they would endure forever: ^''No man shall 
 be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, 
 place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall suffer on account of 
 his religious opinions or belief ; opinion in matters of religion 
 shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect civil capacities. 
 The rights hereby asserted are of the natural rights of man- 
 kind." # 
 
 " Thus," says Madison, " in Virginia was extinguished for- 
 ever the ambitious hope of making laws for the human mind." 
 The principle on which religious liberty was settled in Virginia 
 prevailed at once in Maryland. In every other American 
 
 * Washington to George Mason, 3 October 1785. Sparks, ix., 137. 
 f Semple's History of the Baptists, etc., 71 ; Foote's Sketches of Virginia, 
 844 X Madison, i., 213. » Hening, xii., 86. 
 
1783-1787. OBSTACLES TO UNION EEMOVED. 159 
 
 state oppressive statutes concerning religion fell into disuse and 
 were gradually repealed. Survivals may still be found, as in 
 nature we in this day meet with survivals of an earlier geo- 
 logical period. It had been foreseen that '' the happy conse- 
 quences of the grand experiment on the advantages which 
 accompany tolerance and liberty would not be limited to 
 America." * The statute of Virginia, translated into French 
 and into Italian, was widely circulated through Europe. A 
 part of the work of " the noble army of martyrs " was done. 
 
 During the colonial period the Anglican establishment was 
 feared, because its head was an external temporal power en- 
 gaged in the suppression of colonial liberties, and was favored 
 by the officers of that power even to the disregard of justice. 
 National independence and religious freedom dispelled the last 
 remnant of jealousy. The American branch at lirst thought 
 it possible to perfect their organization by themselves; but 
 they soon preferred as their starting-point a iinal fraternal act 
 of the church of England. No part of the country, no sect, 
 no person showed a disposition to thwart them in their pur- 
 pose ; and no one complained of the unofficial agency of Jay, 
 the American minister of foreign affairs at home, and of John 
 Adams, the American minister in London, in aid of their de- 
 sire, which required the consent of the British parliament and 
 a consecration by the Anglican hierarchy. Their wish having 
 been fulfilled in the form to which all of them gave assent 
 and which many of them regarded as indispensable, the Prot- 
 estant Episcopal church of the United States moved onward 
 with a life of its own to the position which it could never have 
 gained but by independence. For America no bishop was to 
 be chosen at the dictation of a temporal power to electors un- 
 der the penalty of high treason for disobedience ; no advowson 
 of church livings could be tolerated ; no room was left for 
 simony ; no tenure of a ministry as a life estate vras endured 
 where a sufficient reason required a change ; the laity was not 
 represented by the highest officer of state and the legislature, 
 but stood for itself ; no alteration of prayer, or creed, or gov- 
 ernment could be introduced by the temporal chief, or by that 
 chief and the legislature. The rule of the church proceeded 
 
 * Luzerne to Rayneval, 6 November 1784. 
 
160 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; oh. t. 
 
 from its own living power representing all its members. The 
 Protestant Episcopal congregations in the several United States 
 of America, including the clergy of Connecticut v/ho at first 
 went a way of their own, soon fell into the custom of meeting 
 in convention as one church, and gave a new bond to union. 
 Since the year 1Y85 they have never asked of any American 
 government a share in any general assessment, and have grown 
 into greatness by self-reliance. 
 
 The acknowledged independence of the United States 
 called suddenly into a like independence a new and self -created 
 rival Episcopal church, destined to spread its branches far and 
 wide over the land with astonishing rapidity. Out of a society 
 of devout and studious scholars in the University of Oxford, 
 within less than sixty years, grew the society of Methodists. 
 As some of the little republics of ancient time selected one 
 man as their law-giver, as all men on board a ship trnst im- 
 plicitly to one commander during the period of the voyage, 
 so the Methodist connection in its beginning left to John "Wes- 
 ley to rule them as he would. Its oldest society in the states 
 was at New York, and of the year 1766. In 177 2 Wesley ap- 
 pointed, as his ^' general assistant " in America,* Francis As- 
 bury, a missionary from England, a man from the people, who 
 had " much wisdom and meekness ; and under all this, though 
 hardly to be perceived, much command and authority." f 
 
 Wesley never yielded to the temptation to found a sepa- 
 rate church within British dominions, and during the war of 
 American independence used his influence to keep the societies 
 which he governed from renouncing their old allegiance. But 
 no sooner had the people of the United States been recognised 
 as a nation by the king of England himself, and the movement 
 to found an American episcopacy had begun, than he burst 
 the bonds that in England held him from schism, and resolved 
 to get the start of the English hierarchy. In October 1783, 
 in a general epistle, he peremptorily directed his American 
 brethren to receive " Francis Asbury as the general assistant." :j: 
 
 For nearly forty years Wesley had been persuaded that the 
 apostolical succession is a " fable " ; that " bishops and presby- 
 
 * Asbury's Journal, 10 October 1772. f Coke's Journal, 16. 
 
 J Wesley to the brethren in Amex-ica, 3 October 1783. 
 
1783-1787. OBSTACLES TO UmON KEMOYED. 161 
 
 ters are the same order, and have the same right to ordain." 
 He looked upon himself to be as much a bishop " as any man 
 in Europe," though he never allowed any one to call him by 
 that name. In his service for the Methodists he substituted 
 the word elders for priests, and superintendents for bishops. 
 He, therefore, did not scruple, on the second day of Septem- 
 ber 1784, himself, in his own private room at Bristol, in Eng- 
 land, assisted by Coke and another English presbyter, to or- 
 dain two persons as ministers, and then he, with the assistance 
 of other ministers ordained by himself, equal at least in num- 
 ber to the requisition of the canon, did, " by the imposition of 
 his hands and prayer, set apart Thomas Coke, a presbyter of 
 the church of England, as a superintendent, and, under his 
 hand and seal, recommended him to whom it might concern 
 as a fit person to preside over the flock of Christ." It is Coke 
 himseK who writes of AYesley : " He did, indeed, solemnly 
 invest me, as far as he had a right so to do, with episcopal 
 authority." * Eight days later, in a general epistle, he thus 
 addressed Thomas Coke, Francis Asbury, and the brethren in 
 North America : " By a very uncommon train of providences, 
 provinces in North America are erected into independent 
 states. The English government has no authority over them, 
 either civil or ecclesiastical. Bishops and presbyters are the 
 same order, and consequently of the same right to ordain. In 
 America there are no bishops who have a legal jurisdiction. 
 Here, therefore, my scruples are at an end. I have according- 
 ly appointed Dr. Coke and Mr. Francis Asbury to be joint 
 superintendents over our brethren in North America. I can- 
 not see a more rational and scriptural way of feeding and guid- 
 ing those poor sheep in the wilderness. As our American 
 brethren are now totally disentangled both from the state and 
 from the English hierarchy, we dare not entangle them again 
 either with the one or the other. They are now at full liberty 
 simply to follow the Scriptures and the primitive church, and 
 we judge it best that they should stand fast in that liberty 
 wherewith God has so strangely made them free." 
 
 Nor did Wesley neglect to frame from the Anglicaii Book 
 of Common Prayer a revised liturgy for the new church, 
 
 * Coke to Bishop White, 24 April 1791, in White's Memoirs, 424. 
 
 TOL. VI. — 11 
 
162 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; ch.v. 
 
 and a creed from wliicli tlie article on predestination was left 
 out. 
 
 On the eigliteenth of September, about two montlis before 
 the nonjuring bishops of Scotland consecrated a bishop for 
 Connecticut, Coke, the first Methodist " superintendent " for 
 America, was on the water, emulous of the glory of Francis 
 Xavier. " Oh, for a soul like his ! " he cried. " I seem to 
 want the wings of an eagle or the voice of a trumpet, that I 
 may proclaim the gospel through the east and the west, and 
 the north and the south." Arriving in JSTew York, he ex- 
 plained to the preacher stationed at that place the new regula- 
 tion, and received for answer : " Mr. Wesley has determined 
 the point ; and therefore it is not to be investigated, but com- 
 plied with." * 
 
 Coke journeyed at once toward Baltimore, where Asbury 
 had his station. At Dover, in Delaware, " he met with Free- 
 bom Garretson, an excellent young man, all meekness and 
 love, and yet all activity." On Sunday, the fourteenth of 
 November, the day on which a bishop for Connecticut was 
 consecrated at Aberdeen, he preached in a chapel in the midst 
 of a forest to a noble congregation. After the service, a plain, 
 robust man came up to him in the pulpit and kissed him. He 
 was not deceived when he thought it could be no other than 
 Francis Asbury, who had collected there a considerable num- 
 ber of preachers in council. The plan of Wesley pleased them 
 all. At the instance of Asbury it was resolved to hold a gen- 
 eral conference ; and " they sent off Freeborn Garretson like 
 an arrow from north to south, directing him to dispatch mes- 
 sengers right and left and gather all the preachers together at 
 Baltimore on Christmas eve." f 
 
 Thence Coke moved onward, baptizing adults and infants, 
 preaching sometimes in a church, though it would not hold 
 half the persons who wished to hear ; sometimes at the door 
 of a cottage when the church-door was locked against him. :|: 
 
 On Christmas eve, at Baltimore, began the great conference 
 which organized the Methodists of America as a separate fold in 
 the one " flock of Christ." Of the eighty-one American preach- 
 ers, nearly sixty were present, most of them young. Here Coke 
 
 * Coke's First Journal, 1,13. f Coke's Journal, 16. X Ibid., 27. 
 
1783-1787. OBSTACLES TO UNION REMOVED. 163 
 
 took his seat as superintendent ; and here, joining to himself 
 two elders, he set apart Francis Asbury as a deacon and on the 
 next day as an elder. Here eleven or more persons were elected 
 elders, and all of them who were present were consecrated ; here 
 Asbury, who refused to receive the office of superintendent at 
 the will of Wesley alone, was unanimously " elected bishop or 
 superintendent by the suffrages of the whole body of Method- 
 ist ministers through the continent, assembled in general con- 
 ference ; " and here Coke, obeying the directions of Wesley, 
 took to himself at least the canonical number of presbyters, 
 and ordained him, Francis Asbury, as "a superintendent of 
 the Methodist Episcopal Church in America." * In the or- 
 dination sermon delivered on that day and published at the 
 time, Colce asserts his own " right to exercise the episcopal 
 office," and defines the title of superintendent as the equivalent 
 of " bishop." t 
 
 In April 1785 Coke began to exhort the Methodist socie- 
 ties in Virginia to emancipate their slaves, and bore public 
 testimony against slavery and against slave-holding. It pro- 
 voked the unawakened to combine against him ; but one of 
 the brethren gave liberty to his eight slaves. In North Caro- 
 lina, where the laws of the state forbade any to emancipate 
 their negroes, the Methodist conference drew up a petition to 
 the assembly, entreating them to authorize those who were so 
 disposed to set them free. Asbury visited the governor and 
 gained him over. :j: At the Yirginia conference in May they 
 formed a petition, of which a copy was given to every preacher, 
 inviting the general assembly of Yirginia to pass a law for the 
 immediate or gradual emancipation of all slaves. For this 
 they sought the signature of freeholders. And yet in June 
 the conference thought it prudent to suspend the minute con- 
 cerning slavery on account of the great opposition given it, 
 " our work," they said, " being in too infantile a state to push 
 things to extremity." 
 
 The Methodist itinerant ministers learned to love more and 
 more ^' a romantic way of life," " the preaching to large con- 
 
 * Coke's certificate, 27 December 1784. 
 
 f Coke in Tyerman's Life and Times of John Wesley, iii., 437. 
 
 X Coke's First Journal, 37. 
 
164 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CON"VENTIOK b. ii. ; on. v. 
 
 gregations in the midst of great forests witli scores of horses 
 tied to the trees." They had delight in the beauties of J^ature, 
 and knew how to extract " from them all the sweetness they 
 are capable of yielding." The Methodists did not come to 
 rend an empire in twain, nor to begin a long series of wars 
 which should shatter the civil and the religious hierarchies of 
 former centuries, nor to tumble down ancient orders by some 
 new aristocracy of the elect. Avoiding metaphysical contro- 
 versy and wars of revolution, they came in an age of tran- 
 quillity when the feeling for that which is higher than man 
 had grown dull; and they claimed it as their mission to 
 awaken conscience, to revive religion, to substitute glowing 
 affections for the calm of indifierence. They stood in the 
 mountain forests of the Alleghanies and in the plains beyond 
 them, ready to kindle in emigrants, who might come without 
 hymn-book or bible, their own vivid sense of religion ; and 
 their leaders received from all parts, especially from Kentucky, 
 most cheering letters concerning the progress of the cause in 
 the " new western world." At peace with the institutions of 
 the country in which they prospered, they were the ready 
 friends to union. 
 
 America was most thoroughly a Protestant country. The 
 whole number of Catholics within the thirteen states, as re- 
 ported by themselves, about the year 1784, was thirty-two 
 thousand ^ve hundred. Twenty thousand, of whom eight 
 thousand were slaves, dwelt in Maryland. The four southern- 
 most states had but two thousand five hundred ; l^ew England 
 but six hundred; New York and 'New Jersey, collectively, 
 only seventeen hundred. Pennsylvania and Delaware, lands 
 of tolerance, had seven thousand seven hundred. The French 
 Catholics settled between the western boundary of the states 
 and the Mississippi were estimated at twelve thousand more.* 
 
 The rancor of the Jesuits against the house of Bourbon 
 for exiling them from Prance and Spain was relentless. The 
 Poman Catholic clergy in the insurgent British colonies had 
 been superintended by a person who resided in London ; and 
 during the war they were directed by Jesuits who favored the 
 British. The influences which in South America led to most 
 
l'/83-178r. OBSTACLES TO UNION REMOVED. 165 
 
 disastrous results for Spain were of little consequence in the 
 United States. It was Franklin's desire to do away with this 
 influence unfriendly to France. The Roman see proceeded 
 with caution ; and a letter from its nuncio at Paris, on the 
 appointment of a bishop in the United States, was communi- 
 cated to congress. In May 1784 they, in reply, expressed a 
 readiness to testify respect to the sovereign and the state rep- 
 resented by the nuncio, but, disavowing jurisdiction over a 
 purely spiritual subject, referred him to the several states indi- 
 vidually.* 
 
 The British crown, and, at a later period, British legisla- 
 tion, had arbitrarily changed the grants of territory held under 
 the several colonial charters. Nearly three years before the 
 preliminary treaty of peace, ISTew York, to facihtate union 
 among the United States of America, led the way of relin- 
 quishing pretensions to any part of the lands acquired by the 
 treaty of peace. Virginia, which had a better claim to west- 
 ern territory, resigned it for the like purpose, reserving only a 
 tract between the Scioto and the Miami as an indemnity for 
 the expenses of its conquest. Massachusetts persisted in no 
 claim except to the ownership of lands in New York. The 
 charter of Connecticut carried its line all the way to the Pacific 
 ocean ; with great wariness Poger Sherman, so Grayson relates, 
 connected the cession of the claims of his state with the re- 
 serve of a district in the north-east of Ohio. The right of 
 Connecticut to a reservation was denied by Grayson, and, in 
 Sherman's absence from congress, stoutly and successfully de- 
 fended by Johnson. A small piece of land between the line 
 of New York and the eastern line of the Connecticut reserve 
 remained to the United States. Pennsylvania purchased the 
 land and obtained of congress a willing cession of the jurisdic- 
 tion, thus gaining access to the lake and the harbor of Erie. 
 South Carolina had certain undefined rights to territory in the 
 West; she ceded them without qualification to the United 
 States. The rights of Yirginia, North Carolina, and Georgia 
 to extend to the Mississippi, like the right of Massachusetts to 
 the lands in Maine, were unquestioned. In this manner the 
 
 * FranMin'3 Works, ix., 548. Diplomatic Correspondence, iy., 158, 169. Se- 
 cret Journals of Congress, iii., 493. 
 
16G ON" THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; en. v. 
 
 public domain, instead of exciting animosities and conflicting 
 claims between rival states or between individual states and 
 the general interest, served only to bind the members of the 
 confederacy more closely together by securing one vast terri- 
 tory in the West extending from the Ohio to the Lake of the 
 Woods, to be filled, under the laws of the United States, alike 
 by emigrants from them all. 
 
 A more serious matt3r was that of the customs. ]^ew 
 York had yielded to the temptation to establish a custom-house 
 for the sole benefit of its own treasury. Richard Henry Lee 
 taught the authors of the measure that they were defending 
 the rights of the states, and preserving congress from the cor- 
 rupting influence of an independent revenue. Comforted by 
 these opinions of an eminent statesman whom congress had 
 raised to its presidency, New York persisted in treating the 
 revenue levied on the commerce of its port as its own ; and 
 here was a real impediment to union. 
 
 Sadder was the institution of slavery ; for the conflicting 
 opinions and interests involved in its permanence could never 
 be reconciled. 
 
1787. l^EED OF AN OVERRULING UNION. 167 
 
 CHAPTER YL 
 
 state laws impaieikg the obligation of contracts peove 
 the need of an oveeeulinq union. 
 
 Before May 1787. 
 
 A BRILLIANT artist has painted Fortune as a beautiful 
 woman enthroned on a globe, which for the moment is at rest, 
 but is ready to roll at the slightest touch. A country whose 
 people are marked by inventive genius, industry, and skill, 
 whose immense domain is exuberantly fertile, whose abounding 
 products the rest of the world cannot dispense with, may hold 
 her fast, and seat her immovably on a pedestal of four square 
 sides. 
 
 The thirteen American states had a larger experience of 
 the baleful consequences of paper money than all the world 
 besides. As each of them had a legislation of its own, the 
 laws were as variant as the5' were inconvenient and unjust. 
 The shilling had differing rates from its sterling value to an 
 eighth of a dollar. The confusion in computing the worth of 
 the currency of one state in that of another was hopelessly 
 increased by the laws, which discriminated between different 
 kinds of paper issued by the same state; so that a volume 
 could hardly hold the tables of the reciprocal rates of exchange. 
 Moreover, any man loaning money or making a contract in 
 his own state or in another, was liable at any time to loss by 
 some fitful act of separate legislation. The necessity of pro- 
 viding effectually for the security of private rights and the 
 steady dispensation of justice, more,, perhaps, than., anything 
 else, brought about the new constitution.* 
 
 * Gilpin, 804 ; Elliot, 162. 
 
1G8 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION b.it.; ch.ti. 
 
 ]^ sooner had tlie cry of the martyrs of Lexington reached 
 Connecticut than its legislature put forth paper money for 
 war expenses, and continued to do so till October 1777. These 
 were not made legal tender in private transactions/^ and there 
 were no other issues till 1780. 
 
 In October of that year the legislature of the state, once 
 for all, interposed itself between the creditor and debtor. It 
 discriminated between contracts that were rightly to be paid 
 in gold and silver and contracts understood to be made in 
 paper currency, whether of the continent or of the state. A 
 pay-table for settling the progressive rate of depreciation was 
 constructed; and, to avoid the injustice which might come 
 from a strict application of the laws, it gave to the court au- 
 thority through referees, or, if either party refused a reference, 
 by itself, to take all circumstances into consideration, and to 
 determine the case according to the rules of equity.f 
 
 In this wise the relations between debtor and creditor in 
 Connecticut were settled summarily and finally, and no room 
 left for rankling discontent. The first of the ~New England 
 states to issue paper money on the sudden call to arms was the 
 first to return to the use of coin. The wide-spread move- 
 ments of 178G for the issue of paper money never prevailed 
 within its borders. Its people, as they were frugal, indus- 
 trious, and honest, dwelt together in peace, while other states 
 were rent by faction. 
 
 Massachusetts, after the downfall of the continental paper, 
 returned to the sole use of gold and silver in contracts ; but 
 its statesmen had before them a most difiicult task, for the peo- 
 ple had been tempted by the low prices of foreign goods to 
 run into debt, and their resources, from the interruption of 
 their sale of ships and fish-oil in England, of fish and lumber 
 in the British West Indies, and from the ruin of home manu- 
 facturers by the cheapness of foreign goods, were exhausted. 
 While it established its scale of depreciation, it did not, like 
 Connecticut, order an impartial and definitive settlement be- 
 tween the creditor and debtor, but dallied with danger. In 
 July 1782 it allowed, for one year, judgments to be satisfied 
 
 * Bronson's Connecticut Currency, 137. 
 f Laws of Connecticut, ed. 1786, 49, 50. 
 
1787. NEED OF AN OVERRULING UNION. 169 
 
 by the tender of neat cattle or otlier enumerated articles at an 
 appraisement ; but the creditor had only to wait till the year 
 should expire. Repeated temporary stay-laws gave no real re- 
 lief ; they flattered and deceived the hope of the debtor, exas- 
 perating alike him and his creditor.* But when, in May 178G, 
 a petition was presented from towns in Bristol county for an 
 emission of paper money, out of one hundred and eighteen 
 members in the house of representatives, it received only nine- 
 teen votes, and only thirty-five out of one hundred and twenty- 
 four supported the plan of making real and personal estate a 
 tender on an appraisement in discharge of an execution. 
 
 In like manner New Hampshire, after the peace, shunned 
 the emission of paper money. Its people suifered less than 
 Massachusetts, because they were far less in debt. 
 
 Alone of the New England states, Ehode Island, after the 
 peace, resumed the attempt to legislate value into paper. The 
 question had divided the electors of the state into political 
 parties ; the farmers in the villages were arrayed against the 
 merchants and traders of the larger towns ; and in May 178 6, 
 after a hard contest, the party in favor of paper money, with 
 John Collins for governor, came into power. 
 
 In all haste the legislature authorized the issue of one hun- 
 dred thousand pounds to be loaned out to any man of Rhode 
 Island at four per cent for seven years, after which one sev- 
 enth was to be repaid annually. Those bills were made a legal 
 tender except for debts due to charitable corporations. A 
 large part of the debt of the state was paid in them. 
 
 To escape the very heavy fine for refusing to sell goods for 
 paper as the full equivalent of specie,f the merchants of New- 
 port closed their shops. The act speedily provoked litigation. 
 In September a complaint was made against a butcher for re- 
 fusing to receive paper at par in payment for meat. The 
 case was tried before a full bench of the five judges. Yarnum 
 in an elaborate argument set forth the unconstitutionality of 
 the law and its danger as a precedent. Goodwin answered 
 that it conflicted with notliing in the charter, which was the 
 fundamental law of Rhode Island. Judge Howell the next 
 
 * Hinot's Insurrection of Massachusetts, 14. 
 f Compare Otto to Vcrgcnncs, 6 August 178G. 
 
170 O:^ THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; ch.yi. 
 
 morning, delivering tlie unanimous opinion of the court, de- 
 clared the acts unconstitutional and void, and dismissed the 
 case as not within the jurisdiction of the court. At the de- 
 cision, one universal shout of joj rang through the court-house. 
 The assembly of Rhode Island summoned the judges to assign 
 the reasons for their judgment. Three of the five obeyed 
 the summons. At the next session of the legislature Howell, 
 "with two associates, defended the opinion of the bench and 
 denied the accountability of the supreme judiciary to the 
 general assembly. The assembly resolved that no satisfactory 
 reasons had been rendered by the bench for its judgment, and 
 discharged them from further attendance. 
 
 'New York successfully extricated itself from the confusion 
 of continental and state paper money; but in April of the 
 fatal year 1783 its legislature, after long debates, made re- 
 markable by the remonstrances of Duer, voted to emit two 
 hundred thousand pounds in bills of credit. The money so 
 emitted was receivable for duties, and was made a legal tender 
 in all suits.* 
 
 In the council of revision strong but not successful objec- 
 tions were raised. Livingston,f the chancellor, set forth that 
 a scarcity of money can be remedied only by industry and 
 economy, not by laws that foster idleness and dissipation ; that 
 the bill, under the appearance of relief, would add to the dis- 
 tress of the debtor ; that it at the same instant solicited and 
 destroyed credit ; that it would cause the taxes and debts of 
 the state to the United States to be paid in paper. Hobart, 
 one of the justices, reported that it would prove an unwar- 
 rantable interference in private contracts, and to this objection 
 Livingston gave his adhesion. Morris, the chief justice, ob- 
 jected to receiving the bills in the custom-house treasury as 
 money, and held that the enactment would be working iniquity 
 by the aid of law ; but a veto was not agreed upon. :{: 
 
 Livingston, the governor of J^ew Jersey, communicating to 
 its legislature, in May 1783, the tidings of peace, said : " Let us 
 show ourselves worthy of freedom by an inflexible attachment 
 
 * Jones and Varick's New York Laws, ed. 1789, 283. 
 
 f Street's Council of Rerision of the State of New York, 409. 
 
 X Street's Council of Revision of the State of New York, 412,416. 
 
178T. NEED OF AN OVERRULING UNION. 171 
 
 to public f aitli and national honor ; let us establish our charac- 
 ter as a sovereign state '^ on the only durable basis of impartial 
 and universal justice." The legislature responded to his words 
 by authorizing the United States to levy the duty on commerce 
 which had been required, and by making a provision for rais- 
 ing ninety thousand pounds by taxation for the exigencies of 
 the year. In settling debts it gave legal power to the court 
 and jury to decide the case to the best of their knowledge, 
 agreeably to equity and good conscience.f But in the follow- 
 ing December it returned to paper money, and sanctioned the 
 issue of more than thirty-one thousand pounds J to supply the 
 quota of the state for the year. 
 
 In the conflict, the arguments against paper money were 
 stated so fully and so strongly, that later writers on political 
 economy have added nothing to the practical wisdom of the 
 thoughtful men of that day ; and yet in 1786 a bill for the 
 emission of one hundred thousand pounds marched in triumph 
 through its assembly, which sat with closed doors. The money 
 was a tender ; if it was refused, the debt was suspended for 
 twelve years. In the mean time the act of limitation continued 
 in force, and in effect destroyed it. In the council the bill 
 was lost by eight voices to Ave.* In consequence of this 
 check, the effigy of Livingston, the aged governor, was drawn 
 up to the stake near Elizabethtown, but not consigned to the 
 flames from reverence for the first magistrate of the common* 
 wealth ; that of a member of the council was burned. In May 
 the governor and council thought proper to yield, and the bill 
 for paper money became a law. A law for paying debts in 
 lands or chattels was repealed within eight months of its enact- 
 ment. 
 
 The opulent state of Pennsylvania by a series of laws 
 emerged from the paper currency of the war. But, in Decem- 
 ber 1784, debts contracted before 1777 were made payable in 
 three annual instalments. [ In 1785 one hundred and fifty 
 
 * Mulford's New Jersey, 473. 
 
 f Act of June 1783. Patcrson's Laws of New Jersey, ed. 1800, 50. 
 If. Wilson's Laws of New Jersey, ed. 1Y84, 363. 
 
 * Grayson to Madison, 22 March 1786. Otto to Vergennes, 17 March 1786. 
 Q Dallas's Laws of Pennsylvania, ii., 2S6. 
 
172 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONYENTIOK b, ii. ; cii. vi. 
 
 thousand pounds were issued in bills of credit, to be received 
 as gold and silver in payments to the sta,te ; * and fifty thou- 
 sand pounds were emitted in bills of credit on loan, f The 
 bank of the United States refusing to receive these bills as of 
 equal value with its own, its act of incorporation by the state 
 was repealed. 
 
 In February 1785 Delaware called in all its outstanding 
 bills of credit, whether emitted before or since the declaration 
 of independence, with orders for redeeming them at the rate 
 of one pound for seventy-live. After six months they would 
 cease to be redeemable. J 
 
 Maryland, in its June session of 1780, emitted thirty thou- 
 sand pounds sterling to be a legal tender for all debts and con- 
 tracts. In the same session it was enacted that all contracts 
 expressed in writing to be in specie were to be paid in specie. 
 In 1782 it enacted a stay-law extending to January 1781, and 
 during that time the debtor might make a tender of slaves, or 
 land, or almost anything that land produced; but the great 
 attempt in 1786 to renew paper money, though pursued mth 
 the utmost violence and passion, and carried in the assembly, 
 was successfully held in check by the senate. 
 
 Georgia, in August 1782, stayed execution for two years 
 from and after the passing of the act. In February 1785 its 
 bills of credit were ordered to be redeemed in specie certifi- 
 cates, at the rate of one thousand for one. This having: been 
 done, in August of the next year fifty thousand pounds were 
 emitted in bills of credit, which were secured " by the guaran- 
 teed honor and faith " of the state, and by a mortgage on a 
 vast and most fertile tract of public land.* 
 
 South Carolina attracted special attention. In February 
 1782 that state repealed its laws making paper money a legal 
 tender. Twenty days later the commencement of suits was 
 suspended till ten days after the sitting of the next general 
 assembly. 1 The new legislature, in March 1783, established, 
 
 * Dallas's Laws of Pennsylvania, ii., 257. 
 
 f Ibid., 291 
 
 % Laws of Delaware, cd. 1797, 801. 
 
 « Watkins's Digest of the Laws of Georgia, 314, 315. 
 
 I Statutes at Large of South Caroliaa, iv., 513. 
 
1787. NEED OF AN OVERRULING UNION. 1^3 
 
 as in other states, a table of depreciation, so that debts might 
 be discharged according to their real value at the time of the 
 original contract.* On the twentj-sixth day of March 1784 
 came the great ordinance for the payment of debts in four an- 
 nual instalments, beginning on the first day of January 1786 ; f 
 but before the arrival of the first epoch a law of October 1785, 
 v^hich soon became known as the " barren land law," author- 
 ized the debtor to tender to the plaintiff such part of his prop- 
 erty, real or personal, as he should think proper, even though 
 it were the very poorest of his estate, and the creditor must 
 accept it at three fourths of its appraised value. Simultane- 
 ously with this act South Carolina issued one hundred thou- 
 sand pounds in bills of credit, to be loaned at seven per cent. 
 The period for the instalments was renewed and prolonged. J 
 
 During the war, ]^orth Carolina made lavish use of paper 
 money. In April 1783, after the return of peace, it still, un- 
 der various pretences, put into circulation one hundred thou- 
 sand pounds — ^the pound in that state being equal to two and 
 one half Spanish milled dollars ; and in the same session, but 
 after much debate, suits were suspended for twelve months. 
 The town of Edenton, using the words of James Iredell, in- 
 structed their representatives and senator in these words : " We 
 earnestly entreat, for tlie sake of our officers and soldiers, as 
 well as our own and that of the public at large, that no more 
 paper money under any circumstances may be made, and that, 
 as far as possible, the present emission may be redeemed and 
 burned.* But the protest availed nothing. In November 
 1785, one hundred thousand pounds paper currency were again 
 ordered to be emitted, and to be a lawful tender in all pay- 
 ments whatever. So, while the confederation was gasping for 
 life, the finances of North Carolina, both pubHc and private, 
 were threatened with ruin by an irredeemable currency. 
 
 The redemption of the country from the blight of paper 
 money depended largely on Virginia. The greatest state in 
 the union, resisting the British governor and forces at the out- 
 break of the revolution, conquering the ISTorth-west, the chief 
 reliance of the army of Greene at the South, the scene of 
 
 * Statutes at Largo of South Carolina, iv., 563. ^ ^bid., 710-712. 
 
 f Ibid., 610, 641. * Life of Iredell, ii., 46, 63. 
 
lU OlvT THE WAY TO A FEDERxiL CONVENTIOI^. b.ii.; on. vi. 
 
 the war in its last active year, Virginia far exceeded any other 
 state in its emission of millions in j)aper money. After the 
 victory at Yorktown, it ceased to vote new paper money. The 
 old was declared to be no longer receivable, except for the 
 taxes of the year, and it was made redeemable in loan office 
 certificates at the rate of one thousand for one.* In retalia- 
 tion for the most wanton destruction of projDerty, British debts 
 were not recoverable in the courts. For others it constructed 
 a scale of depreciation in the settlement of contracts made in 
 the six years following the first of January 1777. It had stay- 
 laws. For a short time it allowed executions to be satisfied by 
 the tender of tobacco, flour, and hemp at a price to be settled 
 every month by county courts. f For a year or two lands and 
 negroes might be tendered on judgments, but every contract 
 made since the first of January J 782 J was to be discharged in 
 the manner specified by the contract. So Yirginia returned to 
 the use of coin. But in 1785 rumors went abroad that the as- 
 sembly was resolved to issue a paper currency. George Mason, 
 then in private life, scoffed at solemnly pledging the public 
 credit which had so often been disregarded, and declared that, 
 though they might pass a law to issue paper money, twenty 
 laws would not make the people receive it.* At the end of 
 the session Madison could write to Jefferson || that, though the 
 desire of paper money had discovered itself, " no overt attempt 
 was made ! " 
 
 It became known that Meriwether Smith and others, aided 
 by an unfavorable balance of trade and the burden of heavy 
 taxation, would at the next session move for a paper medium. 
 Aware of the danger, Washington insisted that George Mason 
 should be a candidate for the assembly ; and his election proved 
 a counterpoise to the popular cry. Again, quoting from his 
 own circular of June 1783, that " honesty will be found, on 
 every experiment, the best policy," he encouraged Bland to 
 firmness. The subject of paper money was introduced in 
 October 1786 by petitions from two counties, was faintly sup- 
 ported by " a few obscure patrons," was resisted as an encour- 
 
 * Ilening, x., 455. f Hening, xi., Y5, 76. j- Ibid,, 176-180. 
 
 * George Mason to Washington, 9 November 1785. 
 
 II Works of Madison, i., 218. 
 
17S7. NEED OF AN OVERRULING UNION. 175 
 
 agement to " fraud in states against each other," and " as a dis- 
 grace to republican governments in the eyes of mankind;" 
 then, by eighty-five against seventeen, it was voted to be " un- 
 just, impolitic, destructive of public and private confidence, 
 and of that virtue which is the basis of republican govern- 
 ment " The words show the mind and hand of Madison. 
 
 There was need of a new bill on the district courts, but it was 
 clogged with the proposal for the payment of private debts in 
 three annual instalments. Madison held that " no legislative 
 principle could vindicate such an interposition of the law in 
 private contracts," and the bill was lost, thouga but by one 
 vote.* The taxes of the year were allowed to be paid in tobac- 
 co as " a commutable." " These, and such like things," such 
 was the unbending criticism of "Washington, " are extremely 
 hurtful, and may be reckoned among the principal sources of 
 the evils and the corruption of the present day ; and this, too, 
 without accomplishing the object in view, for, if we mean to 
 be honest, debts and taxes must be paid with the substance and 
 not the shadow." f 
 
 Excusing the legislature, Madison answered : " The original 
 object was paper money; petitions for graduated certificates 
 succeeded ; next came instalments, and lastly a project for 
 making property a tender for debts at four fifths of its value ; 
 all these have been happily got rid of by very large majorities." :j: 
 
 The mind of the country bent itself with all its energy to 
 root out the evils of paper money, and establish among the 
 states one common rule by which the obligation of contracts 
 might be preserved unimpaired. ]^o remedy would avail that 
 did not reach them all. They found that for the security of 
 money there were but two remedies : frugality to diminish the 
 need of it, and increased industry to produce more of it. They 
 found that paper money drives specie away ; that every new 
 issue hastens its disappearance, destroying credit and creating 
 a famine of money ; that every penalty for the refusal to ac- 
 cept paper money at par lowers its worth, and that the heavier 
 the penalty the more sure is the decline. They saw the death- 
 blow that is given to credit, when confidence, which must be 
 
 * Madison, i., 239, 252, 253, 255, 260, 265, 267. 
 f Washington to Madison. MS. | Madison, i., 20*7, 268. 
 
176 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; ch. vi. 
 
 voluntary, is commanded by force. Tliej saw that the use of 
 paper money robs industry, frugality, and honesty of their natu- 
 ral rights in behalf of spendthrifts and adventurers.* Gray- 
 son held that paper money with a tender annexed to it is in 
 conflict with that degree of security to property which is fun- 
 damental in every state in the union, f He further thought 
 that "congress should have the power of preventing states 
 from cheating one anotlier, as well as their own citizens, by 
 means of paper money." :j: 
 
 Madison classified the evils to be remedied under the four 
 heads of depreciated paper as a legal tender, of property sub- 
 stituted for money in paj^ment of debts, of laws for paying 
 debts by instalments, and " of the occlusion of the courts of 
 justice." To root out the dishonest system effectually, he held 
 it necessary to give the general government not only the right 
 to regulate coin as in the confederation, but to prevent inter- 
 ference with state, inter-state, and foreign contracts by separate 
 legislation of any state. The evil was everywhere the subject 
 of reprobation ; the citizens of Massachusetts, as we learn from 
 one of its historians,* complained of "retrospective laws;" 
 Pelatiah Webster of Philadelphia set forth that " these acts 
 alter the value of contracts," || and William Paterson of 'New 
 Jersey, one of the best writers of that day on the subject, 
 pointed out that " the legislature should leave the parties to 
 the law under which they contracted." 
 
 For resisting reform, Phode Island and l^orth Carolina 
 were likely to be the foremost ; for demanding it, and for 
 persisting in the demand, Connecticut had the most hopeful 
 record. Among the statesmen to whom the country might 
 look in the emergency, no one had been more conspicuous or 
 more efficient than Madison ; but Poger Sherman had all the 
 while been a member of the superior court of his own state, 
 and so by near observation under great responsibility had 
 thoroughly studied every aspect of the obligation of contracts. 
 
 * Compare the writings and opinions of "William Paterson, R. R. Livingston, 
 R. n. Lee, Madison, and others, written or uttered in the years immediately pre- 
 ceding 1787. 
 
 f Grayson to Madison, 22 March 1786. X Same to same, 28 May 1736. 
 
 *= Minot's Insurrection, 15. [ Webster's Essays, 129, 138. 
 
1783-1786. CONGRESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. I77 
 
 CHAPTEE YII. 
 
 CONGRESS COl^ESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 
 
 1Y83-1786. 
 
 " At length," so wrote Wasliington to Lafayette in 1783, 
 " I am become a private citizen on the banks of the Potomac, 
 solacing myself with tranquil enjoyments, retiring within my- 
 self, able to tread the paths of private life with heartfelt satis- 
 faction, envious of none, determined to be pleased with all ; 
 and, this being the order for my march, I will move gently 
 down the stream of life till I sleep with my fathers." The 
 French minister, Luzerne, who visited Washington a few 
 weeks after his return to private life, " found him attired in a 
 plain gray suit like a Yirginia farmer." " To secure the hap- 
 piness of those around him appeared to be his chief occupa- 
 tion." ''^ His country with one voice acknowledged that but 
 for him its war of revolution must have failed. His glory 
 pervaded the world, and the proofs of it followed him to his 
 retirement. 
 
 Houdon, the great French sculptor of his day, moved more 
 by enthusiasm for him than by the expected compensation for 
 making his statue, came over with his assistants to Mount 
 Yemen to take a mould of his person, to study his counte- 
 nance, to watch his step as he walked over his fields, his atti- 
 tude as he paused ; and so he has preserved for posterity the 
 features and the form of "Washington. 
 
 Marie Antoinette added words of her own to those of the 
 king of France, who invited him to visit them. Luzerne 
 pressed the invitation as the heartfelt desire of the French 
 
 * Luzerne to Rayneval, 12 April 1784. 
 VOL. Ti. — 12 
 
178 01:^ THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVEimOK b.ii.; oh.vh. 
 
 people. " Come to France," wrote Rodiambeau, speaking the 
 wish of all the French officers who had served in America ; 
 " come, and, in a country which honors yon, be assured of a re- 
 ception without example, after a revolution which has not its 
 like in history." But his presence was needed at home to re- 
 trieve his affairs from the confusion consequent on his long 
 service in the war, during whicli he not only refused all pay, 
 but subscribed what he could to the public loans. Of these 
 the amount of the principal had been reduced, and the inter- 
 est, proportionately reduced, was paid in paper almost worth- 
 less. Moreover, persons indebted to him had seized their op- 
 portunity to pay him in depreciated continental bills. 
 
 His estate, than which " no one in United America " seemed 
 to him " more pleasantly situated," consisted of over nine thou- 
 sand acres, for the most part of a grayish clay soil, lying on 
 the south bank of the Potomac, and having, on the east and 
 west, rivulets which rose and fell with the tides, and which, 
 like the main stream, abounded in lish. He would gladly 
 have found a tenant for two thirds of it at an annual rent of 
 three thousand dollars ; but was obliged to retain the manage- 
 ment of the whole. 
 
 His unpretending mansion, with rooms of low ceilings, and 
 neither many nor large, was well placed on a high bank of the 
 river. For beautifying the grounds around it, he would ride 
 in the line season into the forests and select great numbers of 
 well-shaped trees and shrubs, elms and live-oaks, the pines and 
 the hemlock, holly-trees and magnolias, the red-bud, the thorn, 
 and many others, and would transplant them in the proper 
 season. His orchard he filled Avith the best cherries and pears 
 and apples. 
 
 At the end of a year and a half he had not been able " to 
 rescue his private concerns from the disorder into which they 
 had been thrown by the war," though success in the effort 
 " was become absolutely necessary for his support." * After 
 he had been at home for two seasons, his inventory showed of 
 horses one hundred and thirty, of cattle three hundred and 
 thirty-six, of sheep two hundred and eighty-three; the hogs 
 were untold, but on one winter's day a hundred and twenty- 
 
 * Wasliington to Humphreys, Sparks, ix., 113. 
 
1783-1786. CONGRESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 179 
 
 eight were killed, weigliing more than seventeen thousand 
 pounds. His "negroes," in February 1786, numbered two 
 hundred and sixteen.^ JSTo one of them was willing to leave 
 him for another master. As it was his fixed rule never either 
 to buy or to sell a slave, they had the institution of marriage 
 and secure relations of family. The sick were provided with 
 the best medical attendance ; children, the infirm, and the aged 
 were well cared for. Washington was but the director of his 
 community of black people in their labor, mainly for their own 
 subsistence. For the market they produced scarcely anything 
 but " a little wheat ; " and after a season of drought even their 
 own support had to be eked out from other resources ; so that, 
 with ail his method and good judgment, he, like Madison of a 
 later day, and in accord with common experience in Virginia, 
 found that where negroes continued on the same land and they 
 and all their increase were maintained upon it, their owner 
 would gradually become more and more embarrassed or im- 
 poverished. As to bounty lands received for service in the 
 seven years' war and his other domains beyond the Alleghany, 
 he "found distant property in lands more pregnant of per- 
 plexities than profit." His income, uncertain in its amount, 
 was not sufficient to meet his unavoidable expenses, and he be- 
 came more straitened for money than he had ever been since 
 his boyhood ; so that he was even obliged to delay paying the 
 annual bill of his physician, to put ofl' the tax-gatherer once 
 and again, and, what was harder, to defer his charities ; for, 
 while it was his habit to conceal his gifts, he loved to give, 
 and to give liberally. 
 
 Toward the runaway slave Yv^ashington was severe. He 
 wished that the northern states would permit men of the 
 South to travel in them with their attendants, though they 
 might be slaves ; and he earnestly disapproved of the interpo- 
 sition of the philanthropist between the slave and his holder ; 
 but, while expressing these opinions, he took care to write, 
 most emphatically, that no one more desired universal eman- 
 cipation than himself. He pressed his conviction upon the 
 leading politicians in Virginia that the gradual abolition of 
 slavery " certainly might, and assuredly ought to, be effected ; 
 
 * From entries in Washington's unpublished Diary. 
 
180 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; CH.vn. 
 
 and that, too, bj legislative authority."* When Coke and 
 Asbury, the first superintendents of the Methodists, asked him 
 to aid their petition to the Yirginia legislature for an act of 
 universal emancipation, he told them frankly that "he was 
 of their sentiments, and, should this petition be taken into con- 
 sideration, he would signify it to the assembly in a letter." f 
 Finding that the legislature of the state would not entertain a 
 motion to do away with slavery, he sought to devise practica- 
 ble plans for emancipating his own negroes and providing for 
 himself and them; not succeeding, he secured their enfran- 
 chisement by his will, if 
 
 The hardships of the camp had worn upon his constitu- 
 tion, and he was persuaded that he would not live to great 
 age.* The price of health to him from day to day was to pass 
 much of the time in the open air, especially on horseback. 
 Receiving from Europe gifts of the best fox-hounds, he would 
 join in the chase, sometimes came in first, but delighted most 
 in a good run when every one was present at the death. 
 
 It was his earliest care at Mount Yernon to arrange his 
 papers relating to the war for the use of the historian. Being 
 asked to write his commentaries, he answered : " If I had 
 talents for it, the consciousness of a defective education, and 
 a certainty of a want of time, unfit me for such an under- 
 taking." II 
 
 Every one agreed that Washington's "character was per- 
 fectly amiable." In his retirement he so practiced all the vir- 
 tues of private life that the synod of the Presbyterians held 
 him up to the world as the example of purity. To use the 
 words of one who knew him well, " The breath of slander never 
 breathed upon him in his life nor upon his ashes." He was 
 generous to the extent of his means and beyond them. Young 
 
 * Sparks, ix., 163, 164. f Coke's First Journal, 45. 
 
 I Washin^iton could emancipate his own slaves, but not those of his wife's 
 estate ; and the two classes were linked together by marriage and family ties. 
 To this difficulty in the way of emancipating his own negroes, Madison directed 
 my attention. The idea has prevailed that Washington married a woman of for- 
 tune. Her first husband dying, left his affairs in an embarrassed condition, and 
 they certainly remained so in the hands of his executor or agent for nearly thirty 
 years, and probably longer. 
 
 # Sparks, ix., 18. B Sparks, ix., 113. 
 
1783-1786. CONGRESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 181 
 
 persons who came under his control or his guardianship he 
 taught method in their expenses, and above all he inculcated 
 on them the duty of husbanding their means so as to be always 
 able and ready to give. 
 
 Washington was from his heart truly and deeply religious. 
 His convictions became more intense from the influence of the 
 great events of his life on his character. As he looked back 
 upon the thick-set dangers through which he had steered, we 
 know from himself that he could not but feel that he had been 
 sustained by " the all-powerful guide and dispenser of human 
 things." '^ Of the Protestant Episcopal Church, he belonged 
 decidedly to the party of moderation, and " had no desire to 
 open a correspondence with the newly ordained bishop" of 
 Connecticut.! Not a metaphysician nor an analyzer of creeds, 
 his religious faith came from his experience in action. ISTo 
 man more thorouglily believed in the overruling Providence 
 of a just and almighty power ; and as a chemist knows that 
 the leaf for its greenness and beauty and health needs the 
 help of an effluence from beyond this planet, so Washington 
 beheld in the movements of nations a marshalling intelligence 
 which is above them all, and which gives order and unity to 
 the universe. 
 
 Like almost every great warrior, he hated war, and wished 
 to see that plague to mankind banished from the earth. :[: "I 
 never expect to draw my sword again," he said in 1785 to one 
 of the French officers who had served in America. " I can 
 scarcely conceive the cause that would induce me to do it. 
 My iirst wish is to see the whole world in peace, and its in- 
 habitants one band of brothers ctriving who should contribute 
 most to the happiness of mankind." * " As a citizen of the 
 great republic of humanity," such are his words, " I indulge 
 the idea that the period is not remote when the benefits of free 
 commerce will succeed the devastations and horrors of w\^r." [ 
 He loved to contemplate human nature in the state of pro- 
 gressive amelioration.^ His faith in Providence led him to 
 found that hope on the belief that justice has a strength of its 
 
 * Sparks, ix., 21, 22. « Ibid., 138, 139. 
 
 f Diary for Monday, 10 October I'ZSS. | Ibid., 193, 194. 
 
 X Sparks, is., 112, 113, ^ Ibid., 306. 
 
182 OE" THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONYENTION-. e.ii.; ch. th. 
 
 own wliicli will by degrees command respect as the rule for all 
 nations. 
 
 He wished success to every people that were struggling for 
 Letter days. Afflicted by the abject penury of the mass of the 
 Irish, ^* he gave them his sympathies. A hope dawned of re- 
 newed national life for the Greeks. He could scarcely con- 
 ceive that the Turks would be permitted to hold any of their 
 possessions in Europe, f 
 
 He welcomed with enthusiasm the approach of the French 
 revolution, and at an early day pointed out the danger that 
 menaced the king and his only avenue of safety; saying: 
 " His Most Christian Majesty speaks and acts in a style not 
 very pleasing to republican ears or to republican forms, nor 
 to the temper of his own subjects at this day. Liberty, when 
 it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth ; the checks 
 he endeavors to give it, however warranted by ancient usage, 
 will more than probably kindle a flame which may not be 
 easily extinguished, though it may be smothered for awhile by 
 the armies at his command and the nobility in his interest. 
 When a people are oppressed v/ith taxes, and have cause to 
 believe that there has been a misapplication of the money, they 
 ill brook the language of despotism." :j: 
 
 To Lafayette, whose desire to signalize himself he well un- 
 derstood, he said : " Great moderation should be used on both 
 sides ; I caution you against running into extremes and preju- 
 dicing your cause." * 
 
 In foreign affairs "Washington inclined neither to France 
 nor to England ; his system of politics was impartially Ameri- 
 can. At home he Vv^as devoted to no state, to no party. His 
 mind, though he was of Virginia, was free from any bias, 
 northern or southern, the allegiance of his heart being given 
 to United America. 
 
 At Mount Yemon, on the twenty-eighth of March 1785, 
 the joint commissioners of the two states divided by the Poto- 
 mac, George Mason and Alexander Henderson of Yirginia, 
 Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer, Thomas Stone, and Samuel 
 Chase of Maryland, met under the auspices of Washington. 
 As his near neighbor, intimate friend, and old political asso- 
 
 * Sparks, ix., 398. f Ibid., 360. ^ I^id., 332. # Ibid., 381. 
 
1783-178G. CONGRESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 183 
 
 ciate, Mason submitted to his influence and entered with zeal 
 and a strong sense of duty into the movements that led to 
 union. 
 
 The commissioners prepared the terms of a compact be- 
 tween the two states for the jurisdiction over the waters of the 
 Chesapeake bay and the rivers that were common to both states ; 
 and, conforming to the wishes of Washington, they requested 
 Pennsylvania to grant the free use of the branches of the Ohio 
 within its limits, for establishing the connection between that 
 river and the Potomac* 
 
 The primary object of their commission being fulfilled, 
 they took up matters of general policy, and recommended to 
 the two states a uniformity of duties on imports, a uniformity 
 of commercial regulations, and a uniformity of currency.f 
 George Mason was charged with the report of their doings to 
 the legislature of his state. 
 
 "When the assembly of Virginia came together, congress 
 and the country were rent by the question of investing con- 
 gress with an adequate power over trade. The eastern and 
 middle states were zealous for the measure ; the southern were 
 divided ; Pennsylvania had established duties of its own, with 
 the avowed object of encouraging domestic manufactures ; 
 South Carolina was deliberating on the distresses of her com- 
 merce. In the assembly of Virginia, in which there was a 
 great conflict of opinion, Madison J spoke for the grant of 
 power as fraught with no danger to the liberties of the states, 
 and as needful in order to conduct the foreign relations, to ar- 
 rest contention between the states, to prevent enactments of 
 one state to the injury of another, to establish a system intelli- 
 gible to foreigners trading with the United States, to counter- 
 act the evident design of Great Britain to weaken the confed- 
 eracy, and to preserve the federal constitution, which, like all 
 other institutions, could not remain long after it should cease 
 to be useful. The dissolution of the union would be the sig- 
 nal for standing armies in the several states, burdensome and 
 perpetual taxes, clashing systems of foreign politics, and an 
 appeal to the sword in every petty squabble. "Washington 
 
 * Pennsylvania Archives, 511. f Rives's Madison, ii,, 68. 
 
 I Notes of Madison's speech in Madison, i., 201, 202. 
 
184 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ii.; cn.yn. 
 
 being invited to offer suggestions,^ answered : " The jproposi- 
 tion is self-evident. "We are either a united people or we are 
 not so. If the former, let us in all matters of general concern 
 act as a nation wliich has a national character to support." f 
 " If the states individually attempt to regulate commerce, an 
 abortion or a manj-headed monster would be the issue. If 
 we consider ourselves or wish to be considered by others as a 
 united people, why not adopt the measures which are charac- 
 teristic of it, and support the honor and dignity of one ? If 
 we are afraid to trust one another under qualified powers, there 
 is an end of the union." J 
 
 The house was disposed to confide to congress a power over 
 trade ; but, by the stratagem of the adversaries of the resolu- 
 tions, the duration of the grant was limited to thirteen years. 
 This limitation, which was reported on the last day of Novem- 
 ber, took from the movement all its value. "It is better," so 
 wrote Madison to Washington, " to trust to further experience, 
 and even distress, for an adequate remedy than to try a tem- 
 porary measure which may stand in the vfay of a permanent 
 one. The difficulty now found in obtaining a unanimous con- 
 currence of the states in any measure must increase with every 
 increase of their numbers." * 
 
 All was at a stand, when suddenly a ray of light w^as thrown 
 upon the assembly by Maryland. On the fifth of December 
 the adhesion of that state to the compact relating to the ju- 
 risdiction of the waters of Chesapeake bay and the Potomac 
 was laid before Virginia, which without delay enacted a corre- 
 sponding law of equal liberality and precision. || The desire 
 of Maryland was likew^ise announced to invite the concurrence 
 of Delaware and Pennsylvania in a plan for a canal between 
 the Chesapeake and the Delaware ; " and if that is done," said 
 Madison, " Delaware and Pennsylvania will wish the same 
 compliment paid to their neighbors." But the immediate 
 measure of Maryland was communicated in a letter from its 
 legislature to the legislature of Virginia, proposing that com- 
 
 * David Stuart to Washington, 16 November 1'785. 
 
 f Sparks, ix., 145, 146. X Washington to Stuart, 30 November 1785. 
 
 * la Elliot, i., 114, the resolutions as reported on the 30th November are pub- 
 lished as Madison's ; but they found in Madison their strongest opponent. Madi- 
 son, i., 205, 206, and compare 203. | Ilening, xii., 50, 55. 
 
1783-1786. CONGRESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 185 
 
 missioners from all tlie states sliould be invited to meet and 
 regulate the restrictions on commerce for the whole. '^* Madi- 
 son instantly saw the advantage of " a politico-commercial com- 
 mission " for the continent. 
 
 Tyler, the late speaker of the house, " wished congress to 
 have the " entire " regulation of trade." In concert with him, 
 a resolution was drafted by Madison for the appointment of 
 commissioners from Virginia and all the other states to digest 
 a report for the requisite augmentation of the powers of con- 
 gress over trade, their report to be of no force until it should 
 be unanimously ratified by the several states. Madison kept 
 in reserve. Tyler, who, having never served in the federal 
 council, was free from every suspicion of inclining to grant it 
 too much power, presented the resolution. It was suffered to 
 lie on the table till the last day in the session ; then, on the 
 twenty-first of January 1786, it went through both branches 
 of the legislature by a large majority. Among the commis- 
 sioners who were chosen, Madison was the first selection on 
 the part of the house. The commissioners named the first 
 Monday of September for the day of their meeting, and An- 
 napolis as the place, on account of its remoteness from the 
 influences of congress and the centres of trade. The invi- 
 tations to the states were made through the executive of Yir- 
 ginia. 
 
 On the twenty-second Madison wrote to Monroe: "The 
 expedient is better than nothing ; and, as a recommendation of 
 additional powers to congress is within the purview of the 
 commission, it may possibly lead to better consequences than at 
 first occur." f 
 
 The sixth congress could not be organized until the twenty- 
 third of November 1785, when, seven states being present, 
 David Eamsay of South Carolina was elected president. For 
 the half of December not states enough were present to do 
 business. So soon as there vfas a permanent quorum, it was 
 agreed that the confederation had its vices, and the question 
 of policy was : Shall these vices be corrected gradually through 
 congress, or at once and completely through a convention? 
 Just seventeen days after Virginia had invited the states to a 
 
 " Stuart to Washington, 18 December 1T85. f Mcidison, i., 222. 
 
186 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL COISrVENTIOK b. n. ; ch. vii. 
 
 common consultation at Annapolis, Cliarles Pinclmey of South 
 Carolina, in a motion of very great length, ascribed the ex- 
 tension of the commerce and the security of the liberties of 
 the states to the joint efforts of the whole : " They have, there- 
 fore," he insisted, " wisely determined to make the welfare of 
 the union their first object, reflecting that in all federal regula- 
 tions something must be yielded to aid the whole, and that 
 those who expect support must be ready to afford it." * The 
 motion, after being under discussion for two days, was referred 
 to a committee of five. On tlie fifteenth. King, Pinckney, 
 Kean, Monroe, and Pettit, representatives of South Carolina 
 and the three great states, reported : " The requisitions of con- 
 gress, for eight years past, have been so irregular in their oper- 
 ation, so uncertain in their collection, and so evidently unpro- 
 ductive, that a reliance on them in future as a source from 
 whence moneys are to be drawn to discharge the engagements 
 of the confederacy v/ould be not less dishonorable to the un- 
 derstandings of those who entertain such confidence than dan- 
 gerous to the welfare and peace of the union. The committee 
 are, therefore, seiiously impressed with the indispensable ob- 
 ligation that congress are under of representing to the imme- 
 diate and impartial consideration of the several states the utter 
 impossibility of maintaining and preserving the faith of the 
 federal government by temporary requisitions on the states, 
 and the consequent necessity of an early and complete accession 
 of all the states to the revenue system of the eighteenth of 
 A^Yil 1783." "After the most solemn deliberation, and 
 under the fullest conviction that the public embarrassments are 
 such as above represented, and that they are daily increasing, 
 the committee are of opinion that it has become the duty of 
 congress to declare most explicitly that the crisis has arrived 
 when the people of these United States, by whose will and for 
 whose benefit the federal government was instituted, must de- 
 cide whether they will support their rank as a nation by main- 
 taining the public faith at home and abroad ; or whether, for 
 want of a timely exertion in establishing a general revenue and 
 thereby giving strength to the confederacy, they will hazard 
 not only the existence of the union, but of those great and in- 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv., 617. 
 
1783-1786. COI^GRESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 187 
 
 valuable privileges for wliicli they liave so arduously and so 
 honorably contended." * 
 
 Tims congress put itself on trial before the country, and 
 the result of the year was to decide on their competency to be 
 the guardians of the union and the upholders of its good faith. 
 They must either exercise negation of self and invite the states 
 to call a general convention, or they must themselves present 
 to the country for its approval an amended constitution, or 
 they must find out how to make their own powers under the 
 confederation work efficiently. Should they fail in all the 
 three, they will have given an irreversible verdict against them- 
 selves. The course of events relating to the welfare of the 
 whole was watched by the country more carefully than ever 
 before. Far and wide a general convention was become the 
 subject of thought ; and " a plan for it was forming, though it 
 was as yet immature." f 
 
 New Jersey, which had all along vainly songht the protec- 
 tion of the general government against the taxation of her people 
 by a local duty levied on all their importations from abroad for 
 their own consumption throngh the port of New York, at last 
 kindled with a sense of her wrongs, and in a resentful mood, 
 on the twentieth of October voted by a very large majority 
 that she would pay no part of the last requisition of congress 
 until all the states should have accepted the measure of an im- 
 post for the benefit of the general treasury. Alarmed at this 
 movement, congress deputed Charles Pinckney, G-orham, and 
 Grayson to represent to the legislature of New Jersey the fatal 
 consequences that must inevitably result to that state and to 
 the union from their refusal to comply with the requisition of 
 the last congress. Grayson looked upon their vote as little else 
 than a declaration of independence. Again Pinckney of South 
 Carolina took the lead, and, in an address to the New Jersey 
 legislature of the thirteenth of March, this was part of his lan- 
 guage : " When these states united, convinced of the inability 
 of each to support a separate system and that their protection 
 and existence depended on their union, policy as well as pru- 
 dence dictated the necessity of forming one general and efficient 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv., 619, 620. 
 f Jay to Washington, 16 March 1786. 
 
188 ON" THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b.ti.; ch.vh. 
 
 government, which, while it protected and secured the whole, 
 left to the several states those rights of internal sovereignty 
 which it was not necessary to delegate and which conld be exer- 
 cised without injury to the federal authority. If New Jersey 
 conceives herself oppressed under the present confederation, 
 let her, through her delegates in congress, state to them the 
 oppression she complains of, and urge the calling of a general 
 convention of the states for the purpose of increasing the 
 powers of the federal government and rendering it more ade- 
 quate for the ends for which it was instituted ; in this consti- 
 tutional mode of application there can be no doubt of her 
 meeting with all the support and attention she can wish. I 
 have long been of opinion that it is the only true and radical 
 remedy for our public defects, and shall with pleasure assent 
 to and support any measure of that land which may be intro- 
 duced while I continue a member of that body." '^' 
 
 Pleased with the idea of a general convention, New Jersey 
 recalled its vote, accepted within a week the invitation of Vir- 
 ginia to a convention at Annapolis, elected its commissioners, 
 and empowered them "to considsr how far a uniform system 
 in theu^ commercial regulations and other impoetant matters 
 might be necessary to the common interest and permanent har- 
 mony of the several states ; and to report such an act on the 
 subject as, when ratified by them, would enable the United 
 States in congress assembled euectually to provide for the exi- 
 gencies of the union." f 
 
 " If it should be determined that the reform of the confed- 
 eration is to be made by a convention," so wrote Monroe at this 
 time to Madison, " the powers of the Virginia commissioners 
 who are to go to Annapolis are inadequate." J Explaining 
 why more extended powers had not been given, Madison an- 
 swered : " The assembly would have revolted against a pleni- 
 potentiary commission to their dejDuties for the convention; 
 the option lay between doing what was done and doing noth- 
 ing." # 
 
 * Carey's Museum, ii., 155. Otto to Vergcnnes, IT March 1YS6. Report of 
 Berlholir, the Austrian agent. f Elliot, i., 11 7, 118. 
 
 I This letter from Monroe, of a date previous to 19 March 1786, is missing. 
 Its contents are known only from the citation of it by JIadison. 
 
 * Madison to Monroe, 19 March 1786. Madison, i., 228, 229. 
 
1783-1786. OOITGRESS C0:N"FESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 189 
 
 " There have been serious thoughts in the minds of mem- 
 bers of congress," wrote Grajson to Madison, " to recommend 
 to the states the meeting of a general convention to consider 
 of an alteration of the confederation, and there is a motion 
 to that eSect under consideration. I have not made up my 
 mind whether it is not ^ better to bear the ills we have than 
 fly to others we know not of.' I am, however, in no doubt 
 about the weakness of the federal government. If it re- 
 mains much longer in its present state of imbecility, we shall 
 be one of the most contemptible nations on the face of the 
 earth." * 
 
 The subject lingered in congress till the third of May. 
 Then South Carolina for a third time raised her voice, and 
 Charles Pinckney moved that a grand committee be appointed 
 on the affairs of the nation. " It is necessary," he said, " to 
 inform the states of our condition. Congress must be invested 
 with greater powers, or the federal government must fall. It 
 is, therefore, necessary for congress either to appoint a conven- 
 tion for that purpose, or by requisition to call on the states for 
 such powers as are necessary to enable it to administer the fed- 
 eral government." Among some of the defects in the confed- 
 eration which he enumerated were, the want of powers for 
 regulating commerce, for raising troops, and for executing 
 those powers that were given. Monroe replied: "Congress 
 has full power to raise troops, and has a right to compel com- 
 pliance with every requisition which does not go beyond the 
 powers with which it is invested by the confederation. All 
 the states but l^ew York have invested congress with commer- 
 cial powers, and New York is at this time framing an act en 
 the subject. I, therefore, see no occasion for a convention." 
 The discussion was continued at great length, and the matter 
 referred to a committee of the whole, f But the discussion 
 brought congress no nearer to the recommendation of a general 
 convention ; its self-love refused to surrender any of its func- 
 tions, least of all on the ground of its own incapacity to dis- 
 charge them. 
 
 Should congress tlien of itself lay a revision of the articles 
 of confederation before the states for their acceptance ? Here 
 
 * Grayson to Madison, 22 March 1780. f Thomas Rodney's Journal. 
 
190 ON TPIE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION", b.il; oii.vii. 
 
 Grayson, surveying liis colleagues witli a discerning eye, at 
 once convinced himself tliat congress conld never agree on 
 amendmentsj even among themselves.* For himself, he held 
 it essential that the general government should have power to 
 regulate commerce ; to prohibit the states from issuing paper 
 money ; to prohibit the slave-trade ; to fix the site of the gov- 
 ernment in the centre of the union, that is to say, near George- 
 toAvn ; and to change the method of voting by states to a vote 
 according to population. Of effecting these reforms he had no 
 hope. He was sure if the question of commerce should be 
 settled, Massachusetts would be satisfied and refuse to go further. 
 " Pinckney, the champion of powers over commerce," he said, 
 " will be astounded when he meets with a proposition to pre- 
 vent the states from importing any more of the seed of Cain." 
 New York and Pennsylvania would feel themselves aggrieved 
 if, by a national compact, the sessions of congress should always 
 be held in the centre of the empire. Neither Maryland, nor 
 Rhode Island, nor New Jersey, would like to surrender its 
 equal vote for one proportioned to its real importance in the 
 Union. Grayson, therefore, did not " think it would be for 
 the advantage of the union that the convention at Annapolis 
 should produce anything decisive," since it was restricted in 
 its scope to commerce, and the question which he proposed to 
 Madison was : " The state of Virginia having gone thus far, 
 had she not better go further and propose to the other states 
 to augment the powers of the delegates so as to comprehend 
 all the grievances of the union ? " f 
 
 But Pinckney of South Carolina was not daunted. Fail- 
 ing to secure the vote of congress for a general convention, he 
 next obtained the appointment of a grand committee " to re- 
 port such amendments to the confederation as it may be neces- 
 sary to reconnnend to the several states for the purpose of ob- 
 taining from them such powers as will render the federal gov- 
 ernment adequate to the ends for which it was instituted." 
 Congress, in a committee of the whole, devoted seven days of 
 July and six of August to the solution of the great question, 
 and before the end of August the report, which was made by 
 a sub-committee consisting of Pinckney, Dane, and Johnson, 
 
 * Grayson to Madison, 28 May IVSG. f Ibid. 
 
1783-1736. OONGKESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 191 
 
 and accepted by a grand committee, received its final amended 
 form.* 
 
 To the original thirteen articles of confederation seven new 
 ones were added. 
 
 The United States were to regulate foreign and domestic 
 trade and collect duties on imports, but without violating the 
 constitutions of the states. The revenue collected was to be 
 paid to the state in which it should accrue. 
 
 Congress, on making requisitions on the states, was to fix 
 " the proper periods when the states shall pass legislative acts 
 giving full and complete effect to the same." In case of neg- 
 lect, the state was to be charged at the rate of ten per cent 
 per annum on its quota in money, and twelve per cent on the 
 ascertained average expenses on its quota of land forces. 
 
 If a state should, for ten months, neglect to pass laws in 
 compliance with the requisition, and if a majority of the states 
 should have passed such laws, then, but not till then, the reve- 
 nue required by congress was to be apportioned on towns or 
 counties and collected by the collectors of the last state tax. 
 Should they refuse to act, congress might appoint others with 
 similar rights and powers, and v/ith full power and authority 
 to enforce the collections. Should a state, or citizens without 
 the disaj^proval of the state, offer opposition, the conduct of 
 the state was to be considered " as an open violation of the fed- 
 eral compact." 
 
 Interest was to be allowed on advances by states and charged 
 on arrears. 
 
 A new system of revenue could be established by eleven 
 states out of the thirteen ; and so in proportion as the number 
 of states might increase. 
 
 The United States were to have the sole and exclusive 
 power to define and punish treason against them, misprision of 
 treason, piracy or felonies on the high seas, and to institute, 
 by appointments from the different parts of the union, a fed- 
 eral court of seven judges, of whom four would constitute a 
 quorum, to hear a^^peals from the state courts on matters con- 
 
 * From reports of the committee. These amended resolutions may well be 
 taken as representing the intentions of Charles Pinckncy at that time. A copy of 
 them, very greatly abridged, is preserved in the French archives. 
 
192 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL C0NVENTI02T. b.ii.; cn.vii. 
 
 cerning treaties witli foreign powers, or tlie law of nations, or 
 commerce, or tlie federal revenues, or important questions 
 wherein the United States should be a party. 
 
 To enforce the attendance of members of congress, a state 
 might punish its faulty delegate by a disquahfication to hold 
 office under the United States or any state. 
 
 These resolutions, though most earnestly discussed in con- 
 gress, were left to repose among its countless reports. They 
 did not offer one eifective remedy for existing evils; they 
 never could win a majority in congress ; no one fancied that 
 they could obtain the unanimous assent of the states; and, 
 could they have gained it, the articles of confederation would 
 have remained as feeble as before. Still less was it possible 
 for congress to raise an annual revenue. The country was in 
 arrears for the interest on its funded debt, and in the last two 
 years had received not more than half a million dollars in 
 specie from all the states — a sum not sufficient for the annual 
 ordinary charges of the federal government. Pennsylvania 
 had complied with the late requisitions almost with exactitude ; 
 Maryland and Virginia had furnished liberal supplies; New 
 York exerted herself, and successfully, by the aid of her cus- 
 tom-house ; but Massachusetts and all the other I^ew England 
 states were in arrears, and the three southernmost states had 
 paid little money since the conclusion of the late war. Con- 
 gress confessed that it could not raise a revenue unless meas- 
 ures were adopted for funding the foreign and domestic debts, 
 and they went back to the system framed by Madison in April 
 1783 ; but the success of that measure depended on a unani- 
 mous grant of new power to the general government. All the 
 states except J^ew York had assented to the principle of deriv- 
 ing a federal revenue from imports, though the assenting acts 
 of a majority of them still required modifications. Congress 
 saw fit to assume that nothing remained but to obtain the con- 
 sent of that one state. 
 
 In March a meeting of inhabitants of the city of !N"ew 
 York unanimously petitioned the legislature to consent to the 
 system which alone could give energy to the union or pros- 
 perity to commerce. On the other hand, it was contended that 
 the confederation and the constitution of each state are the 
 
1783-1786. CONGRESS CONFESSES ITS HELPLESSNESS. 193 
 
 foundations whicli neitlier congress nor the legislatures of tlie 
 states can alter, and on which it is the duty of both to build ; 
 that the surrender to congress of an independent authority to 
 levy duties would be the surrender of an authority that inheres 
 necessarily in the respective legislatures of each state ; that 
 deviation from the fundamental principles of the American 
 constitutions would be ruinous, first, to the liberty of the states, 
 and then to their existence ; that congress, already holding in 
 one hand the sword, would hold in the other the purse, and 
 concentrate in itseK the sovereignty of the thirteen states ; that 
 it is the division of the great republic into different republics 
 of a middling size and confederated laws which save it from 
 despotism.* 
 
 The legislature of New York conformed to these opinions, 
 and, while on the fourth of May it imposed the duty of five 
 per cent, it reserved to itself the revenue with the sole right 
 of its collection. Nor was it long before Pennsylvania, which 
 held a large part of the public debt, suspended its adhesion to 
 the revenue plan of congress unless it should include supple- 
 mentary funds. In August, King and Monroe were dispatched 
 by congress to confer with its legislature. It is on record that 
 the speech of King was adapted to insure applause even from 
 an Attic audience ; f but the subject was referred to the next 
 assembly. 
 
 Congress joined battle more earnestly with New York. 
 They recommended the executive to convene its legislature 
 immediately for the purpose of granting the impost. The 
 governor made reply : "I have not power to convene the legis- 
 lature except on extraordinary occasions, and, as the present 
 business has repeatedly been laid before them, and has so re- 
 cently received their determination, it cannot come within 
 that description." Congress repeated its demand, and it only 
 served to call from Clinton a firm renewal of his refusal. The 
 strife had degenerated into an altercation which only estab- 
 lished before the country that congress, though it would not 
 call a convention and could not of itself frame fit amend- 
 ments to the confederation, had not power to raise an annual 
 
 * Report of the Austrian agent, Bertholff, 1 April 1786. MS. 
 f Henry Hill to Washington, 1 October 1V86. 
 
 TOL. VI. — 13 
 
194: OX THE WxiY TO A FEDERAL CONVEiTTION-. b. ii. ; ch. vii. 
 
 revenue for the wants of the government at home, or to rescue 
 the honor of the nation from default in payments of interest 
 on moneys borrowed to secure their independence. 
 
 The need of reform extended equally to the relation of the 
 republic to foreign powers. Congress had no other means of 
 fulfilling its treaty obligations than through the good-will and 
 concurrence of every one of the states ; though in theory the 
 articles of confederation presented the United States to all 
 other states a3 one nation. 
 
 The difiiculty which caused these perpetual failures was in- 
 herent and incurable. Congress undertook to enact requisi- 
 tions, and then direct the legislatures of thirteen independent 
 states to pass laws to give them effect, itself remaining help- 
 less till they should do so. A deliberative body ordering an- 
 other independent deliberative body what laws to make is an 
 anomaly ; and, in the case of congress, the hopelessness of har- 
 mony was heightened by the immense extent of the United 
 States, by the differences of time when the legislatures of the 
 several states convened, and by a conflict of the interests, pas- 
 sions, hesitancies, and wills of thirteen legislatures, independent 
 of each other and uncontrolled by a common head. 'No ray 
 of hope remained but from the convention which Yirginia 
 had invited to assemble on the first Monday in September at 
 Annapolis. 
 
1786. VIRGINIA'S INVITATION TO A CONVENTION. 195 
 
 CHAPTEE YIIL 
 
 vntginia mvites deputies of the several legislatures of 
 the states to meet in convention. 
 
 September 1786 to May 1787. 
 
 Congress having confessedly failed to find ways and means 
 for carrying on the government, the convention which had 
 been called to Annapolis became the ground of hope for the 
 nation. The house of delegates of Maryland promptly ac- 
 cepted the invitation of Virginia, but the senate, in its zeal to 
 strengthen the appeal which congress was then addressing to 
 the states for a revenue, refused its concurrence. Neither 
 Connecticut, nor South Carolina, nor Georgia sent delegates 
 to the meeting. In Massachusetts two sets of nominees, 
 among whom appears the name of George Cabot, declined the 
 service ; the third were, like the Rhode Island delegates, ar- 
 rested on the way by tidings that the convention was over. 
 
 Every one of the commissioners chosen for New York, 
 among whom were Egbert Benson and Hamilton, was en- 
 grossed by pressing duties. Egbert Benson, the guiding states- 
 man in the Hartford convention of 1780, was engaged as 
 attorney-general in the courts at Albany. With Schloss IIo- 
 bart, the upright judge, he agreed that the present opportunity 
 for obtaining a revision of the system of general government 
 ought not to be neglected. He therefore consigned his pub- 
 lic business to a friend, reported the conversation with Schloss 
 Hobart to Hamilton in New York, and repaired with him to 
 Annapolis. There, on the eleventh of September, they found 
 Madison with the commissioners of Virginia aiming at a pleni- 
 potentiary general convention, and commissioners from New 
 
196 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; ch. viii. 
 
 Jersey instructed by their legislature to be content with noth- 
 ing less than a new federal government, No state north of 
 'New York was represented, and no one south of Delaware 
 save Virginia. It was a meeting of central states. One 
 thought animated the assembly. Dickinson, a principal author 
 of the articles of confederation, was unanimously elected chair- 
 man ; and, with the same unanimity, a committee was raised 
 to prepare a report. Hamilton, though not of the committee, 
 made a draft ; this the convention employed two days in con- 
 sidering and amending, when the resulting form was unani- 
 mously adopted. In clear and passionless language they ex- 
 pressed their conviction that it would advance the interests of 
 the union if the states which they represented would agree, 
 and use their endeavors to procure the concurrence of the 
 other states to agree, " to meet at Philadelphia on the second 
 Monday of the next May to consider the situation of the 
 United States, and devise such further provisions as should 
 appear necessary to render the constitution of the federal gov- 
 ernment adequate to the exigencies of the union ; and to re- 
 port to congress such an act as, when agreed to by them and 
 confirmed by the legislatures of every state, would effectually 
 provide for the same." * The proposition was explicit ; the 
 place for meeting wisely chosen ; and the time within which 
 congress and the thirteen states must decide and the conven- 
 tion meet for its work was limited to less than eight months. 
 
 In a few days the report, signed by the venerated name of 
 Dickinson, was received by congress ; but the delegation from 
 Massachusetts, led by King, prevented the recommendation of 
 the measure which the deputations at Annapolis had asked 
 for.f The governor of l!^ew York was of opinion that the 
 confederation as it stood was equal to the purposes of the 
 imion, or, with little alteration, could be made so ; and that the 
 commissioners from New York should have confined them- 
 selves to the purposes of their errand. J 
 
 On the tenth of October Kuf us King appeared before the 
 house of representatives of Massachusetts, and, in the presence 
 of an audience which crowded the galleries, insisted that the 
 
 * Elliot, i., 117-120. f Carrington to Madison, 18 December 1786. 
 
 X Hamilton, vi., 605. 
 
1786. VIRGINIA'S INVITATION TO A CONVENTION. 197 
 
 confederation was the act of the people ; that no part could 
 be altered but on the initiation of congress and the confirma- 
 tion of all the several legislatures ; if the work should be done 
 by a convention, no legislature could have a right to confirm 
 it ; congress, and congress only, was the proper body to pro- 
 pose alterations. In these views he was, a few days later, sup- 
 ported by Kathan Dane. The house of representatives, con- 
 forming to this advice, refused to adopt the suggestions that 
 came from Annapolis ; and there was not to be another session 
 before the time proposed for the general convention at Phila- 
 delphia."^ 
 
 From this state of despair the country was lifted by Madi- 
 son and Virginia. The recommendation of a plenipotentiary 
 convention was well received by the assembly of Virginia. 
 The utter failure of congress alike in administration and in 
 reform, the rapid advances of the confederation toward ruin, 
 at length proselyted the most obstinate adversaries to a politi- 
 cal renovation. On the motion of Madison, the assembly, 
 showing the revolution of sentiment which the experience of 
 one year had effected, gave its unanimous sanction to the recom- 
 mendation from Annapolis. t "We come now upon the week 
 glorious for Virginia beyond any event in its annals, or in the 
 history of any former republic. Madison had been calm and 
 prudent and indefatigable, always acting with moderation, and 
 always persistent of purpose. The hour was come for frank 
 and bold words, and decisive action. Madison, giving effect to 
 his own long-cherished wishes and the still earlier wishes of 
 VTashington, addressing as it were the whole country and mar- 
 shalling all the states, recorded the motives to the action of his 
 own commonwealth in these words : 
 
 " The commissioners who assembled at Annapolis, on the 
 fourteenth day of September last, for the purpose of devising 
 and reporting the means of enabling congress to provide ef- 
 fectually for the commercial interests of the United States, 
 have represented the necessity of extending the revision of the 
 federal system to all its defects, and have recommended that 
 deputies for that purpose be appointed by the several legisla- 
 tures, to meet in convention in the city of Philadelphia on the 
 
 * CarriDgton to Madison, 18 December 1786. f Madison, i., 259. 
 
198 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; en. viii. 
 
 secor.d daj of May next — a provision preferable to a discussion 
 of the subject in congress, where it might be too much inter- 
 rupted by ordinary business, and where it would, besides, be de- 
 prived of the counsels of individuals Avho are restrained from a 
 seat in that assembly. The general assembly of this common- 
 wealth, taking into view the situation of the confederacy, as 
 well as reflecting on the alarming representations made from 
 time to time by the United States in congress, particularly in 
 their act of the fifteenth day of February last, can no longer 
 doubt that the crisis is arrived at which the people of America 
 are to decide the solemn question whether they will, by wise and 
 magnanimous efforts, reap the fruits of independence and of 
 union, or whether, by giving way to unmanly jealousies and 
 prejudices, or to partial and transitory interests, they will re- 
 nounce the blessings prepared for them by the revolution. The 
 same noble and extended policy, and the same fraternal and af- 
 fectionate sentiments which originally determined the citizens 
 of this commonwealth to unite Vv^ith their brethren of the other 
 states in establishing a federal government, cannot but be felt 
 with equal force now as motives to lay aside every inferior 
 consideration, and to concur in such further concessions and 
 provisions as may be necessary to secure the objects for which 
 that government was instituted, and render the United States 
 as happy in peace as they have been glorious in warJ' 
 
 Such is the preamble adopted without a dissenting voice 
 by the general assembly of the commonwealth of Yirginia, as 
 they acceded to the proposal from Annapolis with this one 
 variation, that the new federal constitution, after it should be 
 agreed to by congress, was to be established, not by the legis- 
 latures of the states, but by the states themselves, thus opening 
 the way for special conventions of the several states. 
 
 In selecting her own delegates, Yirginia placed Washing- 
 ton at their head, surrounded by Madison, Randolph, and Ma- 
 son. Randolph, the newly elected governor of the state, 
 adopting words of Washington, sent the act of his state to 
 congress, and to the executive of each one of the states in the 
 union, asking their concurrence. 
 
 Hardly had the tardy post of that day brought the glad- 
 dening news to "New Jersey, when that state, first of the 
 
1786-1787. VIRGINIA'S INVITATION TO A CONVENTION. 199 
 
 twelve, on the twenty-third of IN'ovember, took its place at the 
 side of Yirginia. Pennsylvania did not let the year go by 
 ■without joining them. North Carolina acceded in January 
 1787, and Delaware in February of the following year. 
 
 The solemn words of Yirginia, the example of the three 
 central states, the inspiring influence of Hamilton, the return 
 to congress of Madison who was preparing himself for the 
 convention and professed great expectations of good effects 
 from the measure, caused the scales to fall from the eyes 
 of King. The year was but six weeks old when he wrote 
 to Gerry, who had thus far been his ally: "Although my 
 sentiments are the same as to the legality of the measure, 
 I think we ought not to oppose, but to coincide with this 
 project. Events are hurrying ns to a crisis. Prudent and 
 sagacious men should be ready to seize the most favorable 
 circumstances to establish a more perfect and vigorous gov- 
 ernment." * 
 
 A grand committee of the seventh congress reported in 
 February, by a bare majority of one, that, " entirely coinciding 
 with the proceedings of the commissioners, they did strongly 
 recommend to the different legislatures to send forward dele- 
 gates to the proposed convention at Philadelphia ; " but they 
 never ventured to ask for a vote upon their report. Meantime, 
 the legislature of New York, in an instruction to their dele- 
 gates Id congress, taking no notice of the meeting at Annapolis, 
 recommended a general convention to be initiated by congress 
 itself. The proposition, as brought forward by the New York 
 delegates, named no place or time for the convention, and knew 
 nothing of any acts which had not proceeded from congress. 
 It failed by a large majority. King of Massachusetts, seizing 
 the opportunity to reconcile his present coalition with Madison 
 and Hamilton with his old opinion that congress alone could 
 initiate a reform of the constitution, substituted a motion which 
 carefully ignored the act of the meeting at Annapolis, and 
 recommended a convention as an original measure of congress, 
 but identical in time and place with the appointment of the 
 Annapolis commissioners. This motion, which was so framed 
 as not to invalidate elections already made, was accepted without 
 
 * Austin's Gerry, ii., 3, 4, 7, and 8. 
 
200 ON THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONVENTION, b. ii. ; oh. viii. 
 
 opposition.^ In this way tlie seK-love of congress was appeased, 
 and its authority arrayed in favor of a general convention. 
 
 All parties in the legislature of !New York then took up 
 the subject of representation in the convention. Yates, in the 
 senate, proposed that " the new provisions in the articles of 
 confederation should not be repugnant to or inconsistent with 
 the constitution of the state." The motion was rejected by the 
 casting vote of the president. The house would have appointed 
 -Qyo delegates to the convention, but the inflexible senate lim- 
 ited the number to three, and named Yates, Lansing, and Ham- 
 ilton, who were elected in both branches without opposition. 
 
 In 1786, the sufferings of the debtors in Massachusetts, es- 
 pecially in its central and western counties, embittered by the 
 devices of attorneys to increase their own emoluments, and ag- 
 grieved by the barbarous laws of that day which doomed the 
 debtor, however innocent, to imprisonment at the caprice of his 
 creditor, had driven them to interrupt the courts in "Worces- 
 ter. In the three western counties measures were taken to 
 close the courts ; and once, for a moment, the national armory 
 at Springfield was menaced. The movement assumed the as- 
 pect of an insurrection, almost of a rebelHon, which received 
 support even from husbandmen otherwise firm supporters of 
 the law. The measures of Bowdoin, in which he was through- 
 out supported by Samuel Adams, were marked by decision, 
 celerity, and lenity. The real cause of the distress was, in part, 
 the failure of the state of Massachusetts itself to meet its obli- 
 gations ; and, still more, the bankruptcy of the general govern- 
 ment, which owed large sums of money to inhabitants of almost 
 every town for service in achieving the independence of their 
 country. Wherever the insurgents gathered in numbers, Bow- 
 doin sent a larger force than they could muster. In this way 
 he gave authority to every branch of the government and peace 
 to every town. He maintained the majesty of the law by open- 
 ing the courts for the conviction of the worst offenders ; but, 
 interposing with his prerogative of mercy, he did not suffer the 
 life of any one of them to be taken. For the restoration of 
 the public and private finances, he called together the legisla- 
 ture of the commonwealth, which applauded his conduct, and 
 
 * Journals, iv., 723, 724. Gilpin, 587, 588, 619, 620. Elliot, v., 96, 106. 
 
1T87. YIRGmiA'S INVITATION TO A CONVENTION. 201 
 
 fulfilled the long desire of liis heart. On the twentj-second of 
 February 1787, six days in advance of New York, and as yet 
 in ignorance of what had been done in congress, they acceded 
 to the invitation from Annapolis.- Before its delegates were 
 chosen, the recommendation of a convention by that body was 
 known ; and Bowdoin, in their commissions, wisely made use 
 of the words of congress. 
 
 The two southern states chose their delegates to the conven- 
 tion in April. Connecticut waited for its day of election in 
 May. Then Elizur Goodrich, the preacher of the election 
 sermon, proved from one of the prophets of Israel the duty of 
 strengthening the national union and restoring the national 
 honor, or they would be obhged themselves to repeat the lam- 
 entation that " from the daughter of Zion all her beauty was de- 
 partedo" " Gentlemen," he broke out to those to whom he was 
 preaching, " Heaven unite the wisdom and patriotism of Amer- 
 ica in the proposed convention of the states in some equal sys- 
 tem of federal subordination and sovereignty of the states." On 
 the twelfth, Samuel Huntington, the governor, addressing the 
 legislature, recommended a superintending power that should 
 secure peace and justice between the states, and between all the 
 states and foreign nations. " I am," he said, " an advocate for 
 an efficient general government, and for a revenue adequate 
 to its nature and its exigencies. Should the imposts be carried 
 to excess, it will promote the growth of manufacture among 
 yourselves of the articles affected by them, and proportionally 
 increase our wealth and independence. Manufactures more 
 than any other employment will increase our numbers, in which 
 consists the strength and glory of a people." "^ The assembly 
 then chose to the convention three men who were all closely 
 united, and so able that scarce any delegation stood before 
 them. 
 
 Maryland, rent by a faction eager for the issue of paper 
 money, did not elect delegates till near the end of May. 
 New Hampshire, from the poverty of her treasury, delayed 
 its choice till June. Ehode Island alone, under the sway of a 
 perverse party spirit which was fast ebbing, refused to be rep- 
 resented in the convention. 
 
 * Carey's Museum, ii., 396. 
 
202 OX THE WAY TO A FEDERAL CONYENTIOK b.ii.; oh.viii. 
 
 The people of the United States watched the result of the 
 convention with trembhng hope. " Shall we have a king ? " 
 asked Jay, and himself answered : " Not, in my opinion, while 
 other expedients remain untried." '^ It was foreseen that a fail- 
 ure would be followed by the establishment of three separate 
 confederacies. t The ministry of England harbored the thought 
 of a constitutional monarchy, with a son of George III. as 
 king ; and they were not without alarai lest gratitude to France 
 should place on an American throne a prince of the house of 
 Bourbon. J 
 
 The task of preparing the outhnes of a constitution as the 
 basis for the deliberations of the convention was undertaken 
 by Madison. His experience and his studies fitted him for 
 the office. He had been a member of the convention which 
 formed the first constitution for Yirginia ; of its first legisla- 
 ture as a state ; of its executive council when Patrick Henry 
 and Jefferson were governors; for three years a delegate in 
 congress ; then a member of the Yirginia legislature ; a com- 
 missioner at Annapolis ; and, so soon as the rule of rotation 
 permitted, once more a member of congress. From the dec- 
 laration of independence he had devoted himself to the study 
 of republican and of federal government. On the failure at 
 Annapolis, Jefferson cheered him on to a broader reformation : 
 to make the states one nation as to foreign concerns, and keep 
 them distinct in domestic ones ; to organize " the federal head 
 into legislative, executive, and judiciary ; " to control the in- 
 terference of states in general affairs by an appeal to a federal 
 court. With Edmund Randolph, Madison insisted that from 
 him, as governor of Yii'ginia, the convention would expect 
 some leading proposition, and dwelt on the necessity of his 
 bending his thoughts seriously to the great work. of prepara- 
 tion ; but Randolph declined, pleading his want of the neces- 
 sary leisure. Madison proceeded without dismay. He held 
 as a fixed principle that the new system should be ratified by 
 the people of the several states, so that it might be clearly 
 paramount to their individual legislative authority. He would 
 make no material sacrifices to local or transient prejudices. To 
 
 * Sparks, ix., 511. 
 f Madison, i., 280. X Temple, iufra ; Adams, viii., 420. 
 
1787. YIRGINIA'S INVITATION TO A CONVENTION. 203 
 
 him tlie independence of eacli separate state was iitterlj irre- 
 concilable with the idea of an aggregate sovereignty, while a 
 consolidation of the states into one simple republic was neither 
 expedient nor attainable.* In the endeavor to reconcile the 
 due supremacy of the nation with the preservation of the local 
 authorities in their subordinate usefulness, he did not escape 
 mistakes ; but he saw clearly that a widely extended territory 
 was the true domain for a republic, and in advance of the fed- 
 eral convention he sketched for his own use f and that of his 
 friends, :|: and ultimately of the convention, a thoroughly com- 
 prehensive constitutional government for the union. 
 
 "Washington at Mount Yernon was equally studious. He 
 made himself familiar with the reasonings of Montesquieu ; 
 and he obtained the opinions, not of Madison only, but of 
 Knox and of Jay. From their letters and his own experience 
 he drew three separate outlines of a new constitution, differing 
 in manifold ways, and yet each of the three designed to restore 
 and consolidate the union.* 
 
 * Madison, i., 287. f Notes on the confederacy, Madison, i., 320-828. 
 
 X Madison to Jefferson, 19 March 1787, Madison, i., 284; to Randolph, Gilpin, 
 631 ; Elliot, 107 ; to Washington, Sparks, ix., 616. 
 
 * North American Review, xxv., 263. 
 
THE 
 
 FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 OF THE 
 
 UI^ITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 IN- FIVE BOOKS, 
 BOOK THIRD. 
 
 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION". 
 May-Septembes 1787. 
 
CHAPTER I. 
 
 the constitution in outline. 
 
 14 May to 13 June 1787. 
 
 Do nations float darkling down the stream of the ages with- 
 out hope or consolation, swaying with every wind and igno- 
 rant whither they are drifting ? or, is there a superior power 
 of intelligence and love, which is moved by justice and shapes 
 their course ? 
 
 From the ocean to the American outposts nearest the Mis- 
 sissippi, one desire prevailed for a closer connection, one belief 
 that the only opportunity for its creation was come. Men who, 
 from their greater attachment to the states, feared its hazards, 
 neither coveted nor accepted an election to the convention, and 
 in uneasy watchfulness awaited the course of events. Willie 
 Jones of North Carolina, declining to serve, was replaced by 
 Hugh Williamson, who had voted with Jefferson for excluding 
 slavery from the territories. Patrick Henry, Thomas Nelson, 
 and Pichard Henry Lee refusing to be delegates, Edmund 
 Randolph, then governor of Virginia and himself a delegate 
 to the convention, named to one vacancy James McClurg, a 
 professor in the college of William and Mary whom Madison 
 had urged upon congress for the office of secretary of foreign 
 affairs. 'No state except New York sent a delegation insensible 
 to the necessity of a vigorous union. Discordant passions were 
 repressed by the solemnity of the moment ; and, as the states- 
 men who were to create a new constitution, veterans in the 
 war and in the halls of legislation, journeyed for the most part 
 on horseback to their place of meeting, the high-wrought hopes 
 of the nation went along with them. Nor did they deserve 
 
208 THE FEDERAL CONYENTION. b.iii.;ch.i. 
 
 ( the interest of the people of the United States alone ; they 
 /felt the ennobling love for their fellow-men, and knew them- 
 [ selves to be forerunners of reform for the civilized world. 
 
 George "Washington was met at Chester bj public honors. 
 From the Schuylkill the city light horse escorted him into 
 Philadelphia, the bells chiming all the while. His first act 
 was to wait upon Franklin, the president of Pennsylvania. 
 C On the fourteenth of May, at the hour appointed for open- 
 ly ing the federal convention, Virginia and Pennsylvania, the 
 only states which were sufficiently represented, repaired to the 
 State-house, and, with others as they gathered in, continued to 
 do so, adjourning from day to day. Of deputies, the creden- 
 tials of Connecticut and Maryland required but one to repre- 
 sent the state ; of 'New York, South Carolina, and Georgia, 
 two ; of Massachusetts, ITew Jersey, Delaware, Virginia, and 
 North Carolina, three ; of Pennsylvania, four. The delay was 
 turned to the best account by James Madison of Virginia. 
 From the completion of the Virginia delegation by the arrival 
 of George Mason, who came with unselfish zeal to do his part 
 in fulfilling " the expectations and hopes of all the union," 
 they not only attended the general session, but "conferred 
 together by themselves two or three hours every day in order 
 to form a proper correspondence of sentiments." "^ As their 
 state had initiated the convention, they held it their duty at 
 its opening to propose a finished plan for consideration. 
 ^ The choice lay between an amended confederacy and " the 
 new constitution " f for which "Washington four years before 
 had pleaded with the people of every state. " My wish is," 
 so he had written to Madison, " that the convention may adopt 
 no temporizing expedients, but probe the defects of the con- 
 stitution to the bottom and provide a radical cure, whether 
 agreed to or not. A conduct of this kind will stamp wisdom 
 and dignity on their proceedings, and hold up a light which 
 sooner or later will have its influence." $ 
 
 "We know from Eandolph himseK that before departing 
 for the convention he was disposed to do no more than amend 
 
 * George Mason to his son, Philadelphia, 20 May 1787. 
 
 f Washington to Lafayette, 5 April 1783. Sparks, viii,, 412. 
 
 i Sparks, ix., 250, 31 March 1787. 
 
 ) 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 209 
 
 the confederation ; and Ms decision was likely to have great 
 weight in the councils of his own commonwealth. When his 
 royalist father, attorney-general of Virginia, took refuge with 
 the English, the son cleaved to his native land. At his own 
 request and the sohcitation of Eichard Henry Lee, Washington 
 received him as an aid during the siege of Boston. In 1776 
 he took a part in the convention for forming the constitution 
 of Yirginia ; and the convention rewarded his patriotism by 
 electing him at twenty-three years of age attorney-general of 
 Yirginia in the place of his father. In 1779 he preceded 
 Madison by a year as a delegate to congress. In the effort 
 for the reform of the confederation, he, with Ellsworth of 
 Connecticut and Yarnum of Ehode Island for his associates, 
 was the chairman of the committee appointed to report on the 
 defects of the confederacy and the new powers necessary for 
 its efficiency. In 1786 he was elected governor of Yirginia ; 
 and now in his thirty-fourth year he was sent to the conven- 
 tion, bringing with him a reputation for ability equal to his 
 high position, and in the race for public honors taking the 
 lead of James Monroe. But with all his merit there was a 
 strain of weakness in his character, so that he was like a soft 
 metal which needs to be held in place by coils of a harder 
 grain than its own. That support he found in Madison, who 
 had urged him to act a foremost part in the convention, and 
 had laid before him the principles on which the new govern- 
 ment should be organized ; and in Washington, who was un- 
 ceasing in his monitions and encouragement. Randolph, on 
 his arrival in Philadelphia, at once yielded to their influence, 
 and with them became persuaded that the confederacy was 
 destitute of every energy which a constitution of the United 
 States ought to possess.^ ^,^ 
 
 The result was harmony among the Yirginia delegates.-,"^ 
 A plan for a national government, which imbodied the/ 
 thoughts of Madison, altered and amended by their joint con-l 
 sultations, was agreed to by them all. To Randolph, as the ' 
 ofHcial representative of the state, was unanimously assigned 1 
 the office of bringing forward the outline which was to be; 
 known as the plan of Yirginia. This forethought provided in ^ 
 
 * Randolph to Speaker, 10 October 1787. 
 
 VOL. VI. — 14 
 
^ 
 
 210 THE FEDERAL COIH^ENTION'. B.iii.;on.i. 
 
 season a cliart for the voyage, so that the ship, skilfully bal- 
 lasted and trimmed from the beginning, could be steered 
 through perilous channels to the wished-for haven. 
 
 A government founded directly on the people seemed to 
 justify and require a distribution of suffrage in the national 
 legislature according to some equitable ratio. Gouverneur 
 Morris and other members from Pennsylvania in conversation 
 urged the large states to unite from the first in refusing to the 
 smaller states in the federal convention the equal vote which 
 they enjoyed in the congress of the confederacy ; but the Vir- 
 ginians, while as the largest state in extent and in numbers 
 they claimed a proportioned legislative suffrage as an essential 
 right which must be asserted and allowed, stifled the project, 
 being of the opinion that the small states would be more will- 
 ing to renounce this unequal privilege in return for an efficient 
 government, than to disarm themselves before the battle with- 
 out an equivalent.* 
 
 On the seventeenth. South Carolina appeared on the floor ; 
 on the eighteenth, JSTew York ; on the twenty first, Delaware ; 
 on the twenty-second, ITorth Carolina. Of the delegates, some 
 were for half-way measui-es from fear of displeasing the people ; 
 others were anxious and doubting. Just before there were 
 enough to form a quorum, Washington, standing self-collected 
 in the midst of them, his countenance more than usually solemn, 
 his eye seeming to look into futurity, said : '' It is too probable 
 that no plan we propose will be adopted. Perhaps another 
 dreadful conflict is to be sustained. If, to please the people, 
 we offer what we ourselves disapprove, how can we afterward 
 defend our work ? Let us raise a standard to which the wise 
 and the honest can repair ; the event is in the hand of God." f 
 
 On the twenty-fifth, New Jersey, completing the seven states 
 needed to form a house, was represented by William Churchill 
 Houston, who had been detained by illness, and was too weak 
 to remain long. There were from the South four states, from 
 the ISTorth, three ; from the South, nineteen members, from 
 
 * Madison Papers, edited by Gilpin, 726. Stereotyped reprint of Elliot, 125. 
 
 f Oration by Gouverneur Morris upon the death of Vi''a5lnngton, 31 December 
 1799, pp. 20, 21. Morris was, in May 1787, present in Philadelpbia, and relates 
 what he witnessed. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTIOISr IN OUTLINE. 211 
 
 the !N"ortli, ten. At the desire of Benjamin Franklin of Penn- 
 sylvania, "Washington was unanimously elected president of the 
 convention. During the organization it was noticed that the 
 delegates from Delaware were prohibited from changing the 
 article in the confederation establishing the equality of votes 
 among the states.* 
 
 On the twenty-eighth, the representation was increased to 
 nine states by the arrival of Massachusetts and Maryland. A 
 letter was read from men of Providence, Phode Island, among 
 them John Brown, Jabez Bowen, Welcome Arnold, and Wil- 
 liam Barton, explaining why their state would send no dele- 
 gates to the convention, and hopefully pledging their best ex- 
 ertions to effect the ratification of its proceedings. f The letter 
 was forwarded and supported by Yarnum, a member from 
 Phode Island in congress. 
 
 The delegates from Maryland, chosen at a time when the 
 best men of the state were absorbed in a domestic struggle 
 against new issues of paper money, and its senate by its stub- 
 born resistance was estranged from the house, did not ade- 
 quately represent its public spirit ; yet the majority of them to 
 the last promoted the national union. Of idie„iifty:five in the 
 convention, nine were graduates of Princeton, four of Yale, 
 three of Plarvard, two of Columbia, one of Pennsylvania ; five, 
 six, or seven had been connected Vv^ith AYilliam and Mary's ; 
 Scotland sent one of her sons, a jurist, who had been taught at 
 three of her universities, and Glasgow had assisted to train 
 another ; one had been a student in Christ Church, Oxford, 
 and he and three others had been students of law in the Tem- 
 ple. To many in the assembly the work of the great French 
 magistrate on the '' Spirit of Laws," of which Washington 
 with his own hand had copied an abstract by Madison, was the 
 favorite manual ; some of them had made an analysis of all 
 federal governments in ancient and modern times, and a few 
 were well versed in the best English, Swiss, and Dutch writers 
 on government. They had immediately before them the ex- 
 ample of Great Britain ; and they had a still better school of 
 political wisdom in the republican constitutions of their several 
 
 * Gilpin, 723; Elliot, 124. 
 
 f Gilpin, 727 ; Elliot, 125, and Appendix No. 1. 
 
^ 
 
 212 THE FEDERAL CONYENTIOK b. iii. ; ch. i. 
 
 states, wliicli many of tlieni had assisted to frame. Altogether 
 they formed "the goodliest fellowship of" lawgivers "whereof 
 this world holds record." In their standing rules they unani- 
 mously forbade any registry to be made of the votes of indi- 
 viduals, so that they might, without reproach or observation, 
 mutually receive and impart instruction; and they sat with 
 closed doors, lest the publication of their debates should rouse 
 the country to obstinate conflicts before they themselves should 
 have reached their conclusions. 
 
 On the twenty-ninth, Edmund Eandolph, the governor of 
 Virginia, opened the business of the convention in this wise : 
 " To prevent the fulfilment of the prophecies of the downfall 
 of the United States, it is our duty to inquire into the defects 
 of the confederation and the requisite properties of the govern- 
 ment now to be framed ; the danger of the situation and its 
 remedy. 
 
 " The confederation was made in the infancy of the science 
 of constitutions, when the inefficiency of requisitions was un- 
 known ; when no commercial discord had arisen among states ; 
 when no rebellion like that in Massachusetts had broken out ; 
 when foreign debts were not urgent ; when the havoc of paper 
 money had not been foreseen ; when treaties had not been vio- 
 lated ; and when nothing better could have been conceded by 
 states jealous of their sovereignty. But it offered no security 
 against foreign invasion, for congress could neither prevent nor 
 conduct a war, nor punish infractions of treaties or of the law 
 of nations, nor control particular states from provoking war. 
 The federal government has no constitutional power to check 
 a quarrel between separate states ; nor to suppress a rebellion 
 in any one of them ; nor to establish a productive impost ; nor 
 to. counteract the commercial regulations of other nations ; nor 
 to defend itseK against encroachments of the states. From the 
 manner in which it has been ratified in many of the states, it 
 cannot be claimed to be paramount to the state constitutions ; 
 so that there is a prospect of anarchy from the inherent laxity 
 of the government. As the remedy, the government to be es- 
 tablished must have for its basis the republican principle." 
 
 He then proposed fifteen resolutions, which he explained 
 one by one. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 213 
 
 " The articles of confederation onglit to be so corrected and 
 enlarged as to accomplisli the objects proposed bj their insti- 
 tution ; namely, ' common defence, security of liberty, and 
 general welfare.' 
 
 '^ The rights of suffrage in the national legislature ought to 
 be proportioned to the quotas of contribution, *or to the num- 
 ber of free inhabitants. 
 
 " The national legislature ought to consist of two branches, 
 of which the members of the first or democratic house ought 
 to be elected by the people of the several states ; of the sec- 
 ond, by those of the first, out of persons nominated by the indi- 
 vidual legislatures. 
 
 " The national legislature, of which each branch ought to 
 possess the right of originating acts, ought to enjoy the legis- 
 lative rights vested in congress by the confederation, and 
 moreover to legislate in all cases to which the separate states are 
 Incompetent, or in which the harmony of the United States 
 might be interrupted by the exercise of individual legislation ; 
 to negative all laws passed by the several states contravening 
 the articles of union ; and to call forth the force of the union 
 against any member of the union failing to fulfil its duty under 
 the articles thereof. 
 
 " A national executive, chosen by the national legislature 
 and ineligible a second time, ought to enjoy the executive 
 rights vested in congress by the confederation, and a general 
 authority to execute the national laws. 
 
 " The executive and a convenient number of the national 
 judiciary ought to compose a council of revision, with author- 
 ity to examine every act of the national legislature before it 
 shall operate. 
 
 " A national judiciary ought to be established ; to consist 
 of supreme and inferior tribunals ; to be chosen by the national 
 legislature ; to hold their offices during good behavior, wdth 
 jurisdiction to hear and determine all piracies and felonies on 
 the high seas ; captures from an enemy ; cases in which foreign- 
 ers and citizens, a citizen of one state and a citizen of another 
 state, may be interested ; cases which respect the collection of 
 the national revenue ; impeachments of national officers ; and 
 questions which may involve the national peace and harmony. 
 
214 THE FEDERAL CONVENTIOK b. m. ; oh. i. 
 
 " Provision ought to be made for tlie admission of states 
 lawfully arising within the limits of the United States. 
 
 " A republican government and the territory of each state 
 ought to be guaranteed by the United States to each state. 
 
 " Provision ought to be made for the completion of all the 
 engagements of congress, and for its continuance until after the 
 articles of union shall have been adopted. 
 
 " Provision ought to be made for the amendment of the 
 articles of union ; to which the assent of the national legislature 
 ought not to be required. 
 
 " The legislative, executive, and judiciary powers, within 
 the several states, ought to be bound by oath to support the 
 articles of union. 
 
 " The amendments which shall be offered to the confedera- 
 tion by the convention ought, after the approbation of congress, 
 to be submitted to assemblies of representatives, recommended 
 by the several legislatures to be expressly chosen by the people 
 to consider and decide thereon." 
 
 Pandolph concluded with an exhortation to the convention 
 not to suffer the present opportunity of establishing general 
 harmony, happiness, and liberty in the United States to pass 
 away unimproved."^ 
 
 The new articles of union would form a representative re- 
 public. The nobleness of the Virginia delegation appeared in 
 the offer of an option to found representation on " free inhab- 
 itants " alone. The proposed government would be truly na- 
 tional. Not the executive, not the judges, not one officer em- 
 ployed by the national government, not members of the first 
 branch of the legislature, would owe their election to the states ; 
 even in the choice of the second branch of the national legisla- 
 ture, the states were only to nominate candidates. 
 
 It is worthy of note that, as Eandolph declared the propor- 
 tioned rule of suffrage to be " the basis upon which the larger 
 states could assent to any reform," saying, " We ought to be 
 one nation," "William Paterson of New Jersey made note that 
 " sovereignty is an integral thing," meaning that in the new 
 union the states must be equal unless they all were to be 
 merged into one.f The house referred the propositions of 
 
 * Gilpin, YSl-TSS ; Elliot, 126-128. j Paterson MSS. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 215 
 
 Yirginia to a committee of the whole on the state of the union.* 
 Charles Pinclmey of South CaroHna, a young man of twenty- 
 nine, then presented a plan for a constitution, " grounded on 
 the same principles f as the resolutions " of Yirginia. It re- 
 ceived the same reference, but no part of it was used, and no 
 copy of it has been preserved. 
 
 On the morning of the thirtieth, ISTathaniel Gorham of 
 Massachusetts having been elected chairman of the committee 
 of the whole, Eandolph offered a resolution, J which Gouver- 
 neur Morris had formulated, "that a national government 
 ought to be established, consisting of a supreme legislative, ex- 
 ecutive, and judiciary." The force of the word " supreme " 
 was explained to be, that, should the powers to be granted to 
 the new government clash with the powers of the states, the 
 states were to yield.* 
 
 Pierce Butler of South Carolina advanced the business of 
 the day by saying in the spirit of Montesquieu : " Heretofore I 
 have opposed the grant of new powers to congress because they 
 would all be vested in one body ; the distribution of the powers 
 among different bodies will induce me to go great lengths in 
 its support." 1 
 
 " In all communities," said Gouvemeur Morris, " there 
 must be one supreme power and one only. A confederacy is 
 a mere compact, resting on the good faith of the parties ; '^a 
 national, supreme government must have a complete and com- 
 pulsive operation." Mason argued " very cogently " : " In the 
 nature of things punishment cannot be executed on the states 
 collectively ; therefore such a government is necessary as can 
 operate directly on individuals." ^ 
 
 Hoger Sherman, who arrived that morning and enabled Con- 
 necticut to vote, was not yet ready to do more than vest in the 
 general government a power to raise its o^vn revenue ; () and 
 against the negative of his state alone, E'ew York being divided, 
 the motion was carried by Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Yir- 
 ginia, and the two Carolinas, on this day aided by Delaware. 
 
 * Gilpin, 735; Elliot, 128. f Yates in Elliot, i., 391. 
 
 X Gilpin, 747 ; Elliot, 132. # Yates in Elliot, i., 392. 
 
 II Gilpin, 747, 748 ; Elliot, 133. 
 ^ Gilpin, 748 ; Elliot, 133. Gilpin, 748 ; Elliot, 133. 
 
216 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; oh. i. 
 
 Alexander Hamilton of 'New York next moved that " tlie 
 rights of suffrage in the national legislature ought to be pro- 
 portioned to the number of free inhabitants ; " and Richard 
 Dobbs Spaight of E'orth Carolina seconded him. But, to 
 escape irritating debates, the resolution was postponed, and 
 Madison, supported by Gouverneur Morris, moved, in more 
 general terms, " that the equality of suffrage established by 
 the articles of confederation ought not to prevail in the na- 
 tional legislature ; and that an equitable ratio of representation 
 ought to be substituted." * 
 
 Faithful to his instructions, George Eead of Delaware 
 asked that the consideration of the clause might be postponed ; 
 as on any change of the rule of suffrage it might become the 
 duty of the deputies from his state to withdraw from the con- 
 vention. " Equality of suffrage," said Madison, " may be rea- 
 sonable in a federal union of sovereign states ; it can find no 
 place in a national government." But, from the spirit of con- 
 ciKation, the request for delay was granted.f 
 
 The next day Georgia gained the right to vote by the ar- 
 rival of "William Pierce, a Virginian by birth, in the war an aid 
 /-to Greene, and now a member of congress. The Yirginia re- 
 ^ solve, that the national legislature should be composed of two 
 / branches, passed without debate, and, but for Pennsylvania, 
 unanimously ; Hamilton and Robert Yates of JSTew York vot- 
 ing together." J Three weeks later, Pennsylvania, which had 
 hesitated only out of forbearance toward its own constitution, 
 gave in its adhesion. The decision, which was in harmony with 
 ,the undisputed and unchanging conviction of the whole people 
 /of the United States, was adopted, partly to check haste in 
 J legislation by reciprocal watchfulness, and partly to prevent 
 / the fatal conflict which might one day take place between a 
 
 single legislative body and a single executive. 
 
 /^ On the method of electing the two branches, the upholders 
 
 \ of the sovereignty of each state contended that the national 
 
 /government ought to seek its agents through the governments 
 
 I of the respective states ; others preferred that the members of 
 
 Hhe first branch should be chosen directly by the people. 
 
 * Gilpin, 750, 751 ; Elliot, 134. 
 f Gilpin, 751, 752 ; Elliot, 134, 135. X Gilpin, 753 ; Elliot, 135. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 217 
 
 " The people," said Sherman, " should have as little to do 
 as maj be about the government ; they want information and 
 are constantly liable to be misled ; the election onght to be by 
 the state legislatures." " The people do not want virtue ; but 
 they are the dupes of pretended patriots," added Elbridge 
 Gerry of Massachusetts. To this arraignment of the people 
 by men of New England, Mason of Virginia rephed : " The 
 larger branch is to be the grand depository of the democratic 
 principle of the government. We ought to attend to the 
 rights of every class of the people. I have often wondered at 
 the indiiference of the superior classes of society to this dictate 
 of humanity and policy." " Without the confidence of the j 
 people," said James Wilson of Pennsylvania, '' no government, l 
 least of all a republican government, can long subsist; nor [ 
 ouglit the weight of the state legislatures to be increased by I 
 making them the electors of the national legislature." Madi- ) 
 son, though for the senate, the executive, and the judiciary 
 he approved of refining popular appointments by successive , 
 " filtrations," held the popular election of one branch of the 
 national legislature indispensable to every plan of free gov- 
 ernment. This opinion prevailed."^ 
 
 It was agreed, unanimously and without debate, that the '] 
 national legislature should possess the legislative powers of the • 
 confederacy ; but, to the extension of them to all cases to which 
 the state legislatures were individually incompetent, Charles • ' 
 Pinckney, John Putledge, and Butler, all the three of South 
 Carolina, objected that the vagueness of the language might 
 imperil the powers of the states. But Pandolj)h disclaimed 
 the intention of giving indefinite powers to the national legis- 
 lature, and declared himself unalterably opposed to such an 
 inroad on the state jurisdictions. Madison was strongly biasedX 
 in favor of enumerating and defining the powers to be granted, 1 
 although he could not suppress doubts of its practicability. ( 
 " But," said he, " a form of government that will provide for " 
 the liberty and happiness of the community being the end of 
 our deliberations, all the necessary means for attaining it must^ 
 however reluctantly, be submitted to." f The clause was 
 
 * Gilpin, 753, 75i, 755, 75G ; Elliot, 135, 13G, 137. 
 f Gilpin, 760 ; Elliot, 139. 
 
218 THE FEDERAL CO:&TyENTIOK b.iii.;oh.i. 
 
 adopted by nine states, including 'New York and l^ew Jersey. 
 Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut, voting against Sherman, di- 
 vided that state. 
 
 /^ The clauses in the Virginia plan, giving to the national legis- 
 [ lature the powers necessary to preserve harmony among the 
 \ states, to negative all state laws contravening, in the opinion 
 of the national legislature, the articles of union, or, as Benja- 
 min Franklin of Pennsylvania added, " contravening treaties 
 I subsisting under the authorit}^ of the union," v^^ere agreed to 
 L without debate or dissent. 
 
 Madison struggled to confer on the national legislature the 
 
 right to negative at its discretion any state law whatever, being 
 
 of the opinion that a negative of which the rightfulness was 
 
 unquestioned would strip a local law of every pretence to the 
 
 character of legality, and thus suppress resistance at its incep- 
 
 / tion. On another day, explaining his motives, he said : " A 
 
 f negative on state laws is the mildest expedient that can be de- 
 
 \ vised for enforcing a national decree. Should no such precau- 
 
 \ tion be engrafted, the only remedy would be coercion. The 
 
 Jj-' ynegative would render the use of force unnecessary. In a 
 
 > ) word, this prerogative of the general government is the great 
 
 pervading principle that must control the centrifugal tendency 
 
 / of the states, which, without it, will continually fly out of their 
 
 / proper orbits, and destroy the order and harmony of the po- 
 
 I litical system." * But the convention refused to adopt his 
 
 ^ counsel. 
 
 Lastly : the Virginia plan authorized the exertion of the 
 force of the whole against a delinquent state. Madison, ac- 
 cepting the argument of Mason, expressed a doubt of the prac- 
 ticability, the justice, and the equity of applying force to a 
 collective people. " To use force against a state," he said, " is 
 more like a declaration of war than an infliction of punishment, 
 and would be considered by the party attacked a dissolution 
 of all previous contracts. I therefore hope that a national sys- 
 tem, with full power to deal directly with individuals, will" be 
 framed, and the resource be thus rendered unnecessary." The 
 clause was postponed.! 
 
 In this wise and in one day the powers of the legislature 
 
 * June 8, Gilpin, 822, 823 ; Elliot, 171. f Gilpin, 761 ; Elliot, 140. 
 
 / 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION- IN OUTLINE. 219 
 
 which was to be the centre of the government were introduced, 
 and, except the last, were with common consent established in 
 their ontlines. On points essential to union, Yates and Ham- 
 ilton, I^ew Jersey and Pennsylvania voted together. On the 
 first day of June the convention took into consideration the 
 national executive. The same spirit of conciliation prevailed, 
 but with a chaos of ideas and a shyness in the members to de- 
 clare their minds. 
 
 Should the national executive be one or many ? — a question 
 which, from a difference among themselves, the plan of the i 
 Virginia delegates had left undecided. Should it be chosen L^^ 
 directly by the people ? or by electors ? or by the state legisla-f J** 
 
 (A 
 
 tures ? or by the executives of the states ? or by one branch of! 
 the national legislature ? or by both branches ? And, if by* 
 both, by joint or concurrent ballot ? or by lot ? How longi 
 should be its term of service ? And how far should its re- ^ 
 eligibility be limited ? Should it have the sole power of peace 
 and war ? Should it have an absolute or a qualified veto ort 
 acts of legislation, or none at all ? Should its powers be exer-\ 
 cised with or without a council ? Should it be hable to remov- \ 
 al by the legislatures of the states, or by the national legisla- \ 
 ture ? or by the joint action of both ? or by impeachment alone ? ^ 
 
 Here the convention marched and countermarched for want 
 of guides. Progress began to be made on the ascertainment 
 that the members inclined to withhold from the executive the 
 power over war and peace. This being understood, "Wilson 
 and Charles Pinckney proposed that the national executive 
 should consist of a single person. A long silence prevailed, 
 broken at last by the chairman asking if he should put the ]/ 
 question. Franklin entreated the members first to deliver ^ 
 their sentiments on a point of so great importance. Putledge 
 joined in the request, and for himself supported Pinckney and 
 "Wilson.* On the other hand, Sherman, controlled by the pre- 
 cedents of the confederacy which appointed and displaced 
 executive officers just as it seemed to them fit, replied : " The 
 legislature are the best judges of the business to be done by ~ 
 the executive, and should be at liberty from time to time to 
 appoint one or more, as experience may dictate." f 
 
 * Gilpin, 762 ; Elliot, 140. f Gilpin, 763 ; Elliot, 140. 
 
220 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. i. 
 
 " I do not mean to throw censure on that excellent fabric, 
 the British government," said Kandolph ; " if we were in a 
 situation to copy it, I do not know tliati should be opposed to 
 At But the fixed genius of the people of America requires a 
 Ndifferent form of government. The requisites for the execu- 
 itive department — vigor, dispatch, and responsibility — can be 
 ( found in three men as well as in one. Unity in the jsxecutive 
 is the fo3tus .of .jnonarchy." '^ " Unity in the executive," re- 
 torted Wilson, " will rather be the best safeguard against tyran- 
 ny. From the extent of this country, nothing but a great 
 confederated republic will do for it." To calm the excitement, 
 Madison led the convention, before choosing between unity or 
 plurality in the executive, to ^x the extent of its authority ; and 
 the convention agreed to clothe it " with power to carry into 
 effect the national laws and to appoint to offices in cases not 
 otherwise provided for." f 
 
 On the mode of appointing the executive, Wilson said ; 
 " Chimerical as it may appear in theory, I am for an election 
 by the people. Experience in ]^ew York and Massachusetts 
 shows that an election of the first magistrate by the people at 
 large is both a convenient and a successful mode. The objects 
 of choice in such cases must be persons whose merits have gen- 
 eral notoriety." " I," replied Sherman, " am for its appoint- 
 ment by the national legislature, and for making it absolutely 
 dependent on that body whose will it is to execute. An inde- 
 pendence of the executive on the supreme legislature is the 
 very essence of tyranny." Sherman and Wilson were for a 
 period of office of three years and " against the doctrine of rota- 
 tion, as throwing out of office the men best qualified to execute 
 its duties." Mason asked for seven years at least, but without 
 re-eligibility. " What," inquired Gunning Bedford of Dela- 
 ware, "will be the situation of the country should the first 
 magistrate elected for seven years be discovered immediately 
 on trial to be incompetent ? " He argued for a triennial elec- 
 tion, with an ineligibility after three successive elections. The 
 convention, by a vote of five and a half states against four and 
 a half, decided for the period of seven years ; :j: and by at least 
 
 '^ Gilpin, '763, 764; Elliot, 141. f Gilpin, 765 ; Elliot, 141. 
 
 X Gilpin, 767 ; Elliot, 143. 
 
178r. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 221 
 
 seven states against Connecticut, tliat tlie executive sliould not 
 be twice eligible.* 
 
 How to choose the executive remained the perplexing prob- 
 lem. "Wilson, borrowing an idea from the constitution of 
 Maryland, proposed that electors chosen in districts of the sev- 
 eral states should meet and elect the executive by ballot, but 
 not from their own body.f He deprecated the intervention of 
 the states in its choice. J Mason favored the idea of choosing 
 the executive by the people ; Hutledge, by the national senate.* 
 Gerry set in a clear light that the election by the national legis- 
 lature would keep up a constant intrigue between that legisla- 
 ture and the candidates ; nevertheless, Wilson's motion was at 
 that time supported only by Pennsylvania and Maryland ; and 
 from sheer uncertainty what else to do, the convention left the 
 choice of the executive to the national legislature. || 
 
 For relief from a bad selection of the executive, John Dick- 
 inson of Delaware, who did not like the plan of impeaching 
 the great officers of state, proposed a removal on the request of 
 a majority of the legislatures of the individual states."^ Sher- 
 man would give that power to the national legislature. " The 
 making the executive the mere creature of the legislature," 
 replied Mason, " is a violation of the fundamental principle of 
 good government." ^ 
 
 " The occasion is so important," said Dickinson, " that no 
 man ought to be silent or reserved. A limited monarchy is 
 one of the best governments in the world. Equal blessings 
 have never yet been derived from any of the republican forms. 
 But, though a form the most perfect perhaps in itself be unat- 
 tainable, we must not despair. Of remedies for the diseases of 
 republics which have flourished for a moment only and then 
 vanished forever, one is the double branch of the legislature, 
 the other the accidental lucky division of this country into 
 distinct states, which some seem desirous to abolish altogether. 
 This division ought to be maintained, and considerable powers 
 to be left with the states. This is the ground of my consola- 
 
 * Gilpin, 119 ; Elliot, 149. |j Gilpin, 770 ; Elliot, 144. 
 
 f Gilpin, 763 ; Elliot, 143. ^ Gilpin, 776 ; Elliot, 147. 
 
 X Gilpin, 767 ; Elliot, 143. Gilpi^. '^'^6 ; Elliot, 147. 
 
 «= Gilpin, 768 ; Elliot, 143. 
 
/ 
 
 / 
 
 222 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; oh. i. 
 
 tion for tlie future fate of my country. In case of a consolida- 
 tion of the states into one great republic, we may read its fate 
 in the history of smaller ones. The point of representation 
 in the national legislature of states of different sizes must end 
 in mutual concession. I hope that each state will retain an 
 equal voice, at least in one branch of the national legislature." * 
 The motion of Dickinson was sustained only by Delaware ; 
 and the executive was made removable on " impeachment and 
 conviction of malpractice or neglect of duty." f But the ad- 
 vice on the distribution of suffrage in the national legislature 
 sank deep into the minds of his hearers. 
 
 Eandolph pleaded anew for an executive body of three 
 members, one from each of the three geographical divisions of 
 the country. " That would lead to a constant struggle for local 
 advantages," replied Butler, who had travelled in Holland ; 
 and from his own observation he sketched the distraction of 
 the Low Countries from a plurality of military heads. :{: " Ex- 
 ecutive questions," said Wilson on the fourth, " have many 
 sides ; and of three members no two might agree.* All the 
 thirteen states place a single magistrate at the head. Unity in 
 the executive will favor the tranquillity not less than the vigor 
 /of the government." || Assenting to unity in the executive, 
 J Sherman thought a council necessary to make that unity ac- 
 /ceptable to the people. " A council," replied Wilson, " of tener 
 ( covers malpractices than prevents them." The proposal for a 
 single executive was sustained by seven states against ISTew 
 York, Delaware, and Maryland. In the Virginia delegation 
 there would have been a tie but for AVashington."'^ The de- 
 cision v/as reached after mature deliberation, and was accepted 
 as final. 
 
 Wilson and Hamilton desired to trust the executive with 
 an absolute negative on acts of legislation ; but this was op- 
 posed, though from widely differing motives, by G-erry, Frank- 
 lin, Sherman, Madison, Butler, Bedford, and Mason,^ and was 
 unanimously negatived. 
 
 * Gilpin, IIS; Elliot, 148. i Gilpin, 781 ; Elliot, 150. 
 t Gili in, 779 ; Elliot, 149. ^ Gilpin, 782, 783 ; Elliot, 151. 
 X Gilpin, 780 ; Elliot, 149. ^ Gilpin, 784-787; Elliot, 151-154. 
 
 * Gilpin, 782; Elliot, 150. 
 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 223 
 
 "When Wilson urged upon tlie convention the Yirginia plan 
 of vesting a limited veto on legislation in a council of revision 
 composed of the executive and a convenient number of the ju- 
 diciary, Gerry called to mind that judges had in some states, 
 and with general approbation, set aside laws as being against 
 the constitution ; but that from the nature of their otiice they 
 were unfit to be consulted on the policy of public measures ; 
 and, after the example of his own state, he proposed rather to 
 confide the veto power to the executive alone, subject to be 
 overruled by two thirds of each branch. " Judges," said Ruf us 
 King of Massachusetts, " should expound the law as it may 
 come before them, free from the bias of having participated in 
 its formation." * Gerry's motion was carried by eight states 
 against Connecticut and Maryland.f 
 
 In a convention composed chiefly of lawyers, the organiza:-^ 
 tion of the judiciary engaged eager attention ; at the close of a I 
 long sitting, the Virginia resolution, that a national judiciary L 
 be established, passed without debate and unanimously, with a 
 further clause that the national judiciary should consist of one 
 supreme tribunal and of one or more inferior tribunals. J 
 
 A night's reflection developed a jealousy of transferring 
 business from the courts of the states to the courts of the 
 union ; and on the fifth Rutledge and Sherman insisted that 
 state tribunals ought, in all cases, to decide in the first instance, 
 yet without impairing the right of appeal. Madison replied : * 
 " Unless inferior tribunals are dispersed throughout the repub- 
 lic, in many cases with final jurisdiction, appeals will be most 
 oppressively multiplied. A government without a proper e^^ 
 ecutive and judiciary will be the mere trunk of a body, without! 
 arms or legs to act or move." The motion to dispense with! 
 the inferior national tribunals prevailed ; but Dickinson, Wil- / 
 son, and Madison, marking the distinction between establishing/ 
 them and giving a discretion to establish them, obtained a great 
 majority for empowering the national legislature to provide for 
 their institution. || On the thirteenth it was unanimously 
 
 * Gilpin, 783 ; Elliot, 151. | Gilpin, 790, 791 ; Elliot, 155. 
 
 t Gilpin, 791 ; Elliot, 155; and Elliot, i., 160. 
 
 « Gilpin, 798, 799 ; Elliot, 159. 
 
 II Gilpin, 800; Elliot, 160. Compare Elliot, i., 1G3, 097. 
 
224: THE FEDERAL CON VENTIOK b. iii. ; oh. i. 
 
 r agreed " that tlie power of tlie national judiciary should extend 
 ) to all cases of national revenue, impeacliment of national oiii- 
 "' cers, and questions which involve tlie national peace or har- 
 ^^ monj." * 
 
 The Yirginia plan intrusted the appointment of the judges 
 \ to the legislature ; Wilson proposed to transfer it to the execu- 
 tive; Madison to the senate; and on the thirteenth the last 
 ( mode was accepted without dissent. f All agreed that their 
 tenure of office should be good behavior, and that their com- 
 pensation should be safe from diminution during the period of 
 their service. 
 
 On the sixth of June, Chaiies Pincknej, supported by Kut- 
 ledge, made once more a most earnest effort in favor of elect- 
 ing the first branch of the legislature by the legislatures of the 
 states, and not by the people. " Vigorous authority," insisted 
 Wilson, " should flow immediately from the legitimate source 
 of all authority, the people. Eepresentation ought to be the 
 exact transcript of the whole society ; it is made necessary only 
 because it is impossible for the people to act collectively." " If 
 it is in view," said Sherman, "to abolish the state governments, 
 the elections ought to be by the people. If they are to be con- 
 tinued, the elections to the national government should be made 
 by them. I am for giving the general government power to 
 legislate and execute within a defined province. The objects 
 of the union are few : defence against foreign danger, internal 
 disputes, and a resort to force ; treaties with foreign nations ; 
 the regulation of foreign commerce and drawing revenue from 
 it. These, and perhaps a few lesser objects, alone rendered a 
 confederation of the states necessary. All other matters, civil 
 and criminal, will be much better in the hands of the states." J 
 
 " Under the existing confederacy," said Mason, " congress 
 represent the states, and not the people of the states; their 
 acts operate on the states, not on individuals. In the new plan 
 of government the people wiU be represented ; they ought, 
 therefore, to choose the representatives.* Improper elections 
 in many cases are inseparable from republican governments. 
 
 * Gilpin, 855 ; Elliot, 188 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 409. 
 
 f Gilpin, 792, 793, 855; Elliot, 155, 156, 188. 
 
 i Gilpin, 801, 802, 803 ; Elliot, 160, 161. =^ Gilpin, 803 ; Elliot, 161, 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 225 
 
 But compare these with the advantage of this form, in favor 
 of the rights of the people, in favor of human nature ! " 
 
 Approving the objects of union which Sherman had enu- 
 merated, "I combine with them," said Madison, "the necessity 
 of providing more effectually for the security of private rights 
 and the steady dispensation of justice." * And he explained 
 at great length that the safety of a republic requires for its 
 jurisdiction a large extent of territory, with interests so many 
 and so various that the majority could never unite in the pur- 
 suit of any one of them. " It is incumbent on us," he said, 
 " to try this remedy, and to frame a republican system on such 
 a scale and in such a form as will control all the evils which 
 have been experienced." f 
 
 " It is essential," said Dickinson, " that one branch of the 
 legislature should be drawn immediately from the people ; and 
 it is expedient that the other should be chosen by the legisla- 
 tures of the states. Tliis combination of the state govern- 
 ments with the national government is as politic as it is una- 
 voidable." 
 
 Pierce spoke for an election of the first branch by the peo- 
 ple, of the second by tlie states ; so that the citizens of the 
 states will be represented both individually and collectively. X 
 
 When on the twenty-first the same question was revived 
 in the convention, Charles Cotesv/orth Pinckney of South 
 Carolina, seconded by Luther Martin of Maryland, adopting a 
 milder form, proposed " that the first branch, instead of being 
 elected by the people, should be elected in such manner as the 
 legislature of each state should direct." * 
 
 " It is essential to the democratic rights of the community," 
 said Hamilton, enouncing a principle which he upheld with 
 unswerving consistency, "that the first branch be directly 
 elected by the people." " The democratic principle," Mason 
 repeated, " must actuate one part of the government. It is the 
 only security for the rights of the people." "An election by 
 the legislature," pleaded Kutledge, " would be a more refining 
 process." " The election of the first branch by the people," 
 said Wilson, " is not the corner-stone only, but the foundation 
 
 * Gilpin, 804 ; Elliot, 162. % Gilpin, 807 ; Elliot, 163. 
 
 f Gilpin, 806 ; Elliot, 163. » Gilpin, 925 ; Elliot, 223. 
 
 VOL. VI. — 15 
 
226 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. m.;cH.i. 
 
 of the fabric." * Soutli Carolina, finding herself feebly sup- 
 ported, gave up the struggle. 
 
 On the seventh of June, Dickinson moved that the mem- 
 bers of the second branch, or, as it is now called, the senate, 
 ought to be chosen by tlie individual legislatures.! The mo- 
 tion, without waiving the claim to perfect equality, clearly 
 implied that each state should elect at least one senator. " If 
 each of the small states should be allowed one senator," said 
 Cotesworth Pinckney, " there will be eighty at least." *' I 
 have no objection to eighty or twice eighty of them," rejoined 
 Dicldnson. " The legislature of a numerous people ought to 
 be a numerous body. I wish the senate to bear as strong a 
 likeness as possible to the British house of lords, and to consist 
 of men distinguished for their rank in life and their weight of 
 property. Sach characters are more likely to be selected by 
 the state legislatures than in any other mode." " To depart 
 from the proportional representation in the senate," said Madi- 
 son, " is inadmissible, being evidently unjust. The use of the 
 senate is to consist in its proceeding with more coolness, sys- 
 tem, and wisdom than the popular branch. Enlarge their 
 number, and you communicate to them the vices which they 
 are meant to correct. Their weight will be in an inverse ratio 
 to their numbers." Dickinson replied : " The preservation of 
 the states in a certain degree of agency is indispensable. The 
 proposed national system is like the solar system, in which the 
 states are the planets, and they ought to be left to move more 
 freely in their proper orbits." J 
 
 " The states," answered Wilson, " are in no danger of being 
 devoured by the national government ; I wish to keep them 
 from devouring the national government. Their existence is 
 made essential by the great extent of our country. I am for an 
 election of the second branch by the people in large districts, 
 subdividing the districts only for the accommodation of voters." 
 Gerry and Sherman declared themselves in favor of electing 
 the senate by the individual legislatures. From Charles Pinck- 
 ney came a proposal to divide the states periodically into three 
 
 * Gilpin, 926, 927 ; Elliot, 223, 224. Yates in Elliot, i., 432, 433. 
 
 f Gilpin, 812; Elliot, IGG. 
 
 X Gilpin, 813, 814, 815 ; Elliot, 166, 167. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 227 
 
 classes according to their comparative importance ; the first 
 class to have three members, the second two, and the third one 
 member each ; but it received no attention. Mason closed the 
 debate : " The state legislatures ought to have some means of 
 defending themselves against encroachments of the national 
 government. And what better means can we provide than to 
 make them a constituent part of the national establishment? 
 'No doubt there is danger on both sides ; but we have only 
 seen the evils arising on the side of the state governments. 
 Those on the other side remain to be displayed ; for congress 
 had not power to carry their acts into execution, as the national 
 government will now have." The vote was then taken, and 
 the choice of the second branch or senate was with one consent 
 intrusted to the individual legislatures. In this way the states 
 as states made their lodgment in the new constitution.* 
 
 The equality of the small states was next imperilled. On 
 the ninth, David Brearley, the chief justice of New Jersey, \ 
 vehemently protested against any change of the equal suffrage 
 of the states. To the remark of Randolph, that the states 
 ought to be one nation, Paterson replied : " The idea of a 
 national government as contradistinguished from a federal 
 one never entered into the mind of any of the states. If the 
 states are as states still to continue in union, they must be 
 considered as equals. Thirteen sovereign and independent 
 states can never constitute one nation, and at the same time 
 be states. If we are to be formed into a nation, the states as 
 states must be abolished, and the whole must be thrown into 
 hotchpot, and when an equal division is made there may be 
 fairly an equality of representation. New Jersey will never 
 confederate on the plan before the committee. I would rather 
 submit to a despot than to such a fate. I will not only oppose 
 the plan here, but on my return home will do everything in 
 my power to defeat it there." f 
 
 When, on the eleventh, the committee of the w^hole was 
 about to take the question, Franklin, ever the peace-maker, 
 reproved the want of coolness and temper in the late debates. 
 
 * Gilpin, 817, 818, 821 ; Elliot, 1G8, 169, 170 ; and i., 1G5, 399. 
 ■{■ Paterson MSS. Gilpin, 831, 832 ; and compare STO, 902, 903 ; Elliot, 176, 
 177, 194, 211. 
 
228 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. i. 
 
 " We are sent here," lie said, " to consult, not to contend with 
 each other;" and, though he mingled crude proposals with 
 wholesome precepts, he saw the danger of the pass into which 
 they were entering. There were six states, two northern and 
 four southern, demanding a representation in some degree pro- 
 portioned to numbers — Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, 
 and the two Carolinas with Georgia, whose delegates, as they con- 
 templated her vast and most fertile territory, indulged in glow- 
 ing visions of her swift advances. There were two northern 
 with one southern state for an equal representation of states — 
 ]^ew York, 'New Jersey, and Delaware. Connecticut stood 
 between the two. It was carried by the six national states 
 and Connecticut against the three confederating states, Mary- 
 land being divided, that in the first branch, or house of repre- 
 sentatives, of the national legislature, the suffrage ought to be 
 according to some equitable ratio. In April 1783, congress 
 had apportioned the sup^Dlies of the states for the common 
 treasury to the whole number of their free inhabitants and 
 three fifths of other persons ; in this precedent the equitable 
 ratio for representation in the popular branch was found.* 
 
 Connecticut then took the lead ; and Sherman, acting upon 
 a principle which he had avowed more than ten years before, 
 moved that each state should have one vote in the second 
 branch, or senate. "Everything," he said, "depends on this; 
 the smaller states will never agree to the plan on any other 
 principle than an equality of suffrage in this branch." Ells- 
 worth shored up his colleague ; but they rallied only five states 
 against the six which had demanded a proportioned represen- 
 tation. 
 
 Finally Wilson and Hamilton proposed for the second 
 branch the same rule of suffrage as for the first ; and this, too, 
 was carried by the phalanx of the same six states against the 
 remaining five. So the settlement offered by Wilson, Hamil- 
 ton, Madison, Rutledge, and others, to the small states, and 
 adopted in the committee of the whole, was: The appoint- 
 ment of the senators among the states according to represen- 
 tative population, except that each state should have at least 
 one. 
 
 * Gilpin, 843; Elliot, 181. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN OUTLINE. 229 
 
 The convention speeded through the remainder of the Vir- 
 ginia plan. A guarantee to each state of its territory was de- 
 clined. A republican constitution, the only one suited to the 
 genius of the United States, to the principles on which thej 
 had conducted their war for independence, to their assumjDtion 
 before the world of the responsibility of demonstrating man's 
 capacity for self-government, was guaranteed to each one of 
 the United States. 
 
 The requirement of an oath from the highest state officers 
 to support the articles of union was opposed by Shennan * as 
 an intrusion into the state jurisdictions, and supported by Ran- 
 dolph as a necessary precaution. " An oath of fidelity to the 
 states from national officers might as well be required," said 
 Gerry. Martin observed: "If the new oath should conflict 
 with that already taken by state officers, it would be improp- 
 er ; if coincident, it would be superfluous." f The clause was 
 retained by the vote of the six national states. By the same 
 vote the new system was referred for consideration and deci- 
 sion to assemblies chosen expressly for the purpose by the 
 people of the several states. The articles of union were there- 
 after open to " amendment whensoever it should seem neces- 
 sary." 
 
 Sherman and Ellsworth, speaking on the twelfth, wished 
 the members of the popular branch to be chosen annually. 
 " The people of New England," said Gerry, " will never give 
 up annual elections." J " "We ought," replied Madison, " to 
 consider what is right and necessary in itself for the attain- 
 ment of a proper government ; " and his proposal of a term of 
 three years was adopted for the time ; though, to humor the 
 eastern states, it was afterward changed to two. The ineligi- 
 bility of members of congress to national offices was limited to 
 one year after their retirement ; but, on the motion of Charles 
 Pinckney, the restriction on their re-election was removed, and 
 the power of recalling them, which was plainly inconsistent 
 with their choice by the people, was taken away.* 
 
 The qualification of age was at a later day fixed at twenty- 
 five years for the branch elected by the people. For senators 
 
 * Gilpin, 845 ; Elliot, 1S2. t Gilpin, 847 ; Elliot, 184. 
 
 t Gilpin, 845 ; Elliot, 183. « Gilpin, 851 ; Elliot, 185. 
 
230 THE FEDERAL CONVENTIOX. b. in. ; oh. i. 
 
 the q-aaliiicatioii of age was at that time fixed at thirty. Pierce 
 would have limited their term of service to three years ; Sher- 
 man to not more than -Q-ve ; but a great majority held seven 
 years by no means too long. 
 
 The resolutions of the committee departed from the origi- 
 nal plan of Yirginia but rarely, and, for the most part, for the 
 better. Thus amended, it formed a complete outline of a fed- 
 eral republic. The mighty work was finished in thirteen ses- 
 sions, with little opposition except from the small states, and 
 from them chiefly because they insisted on equality of suffrage 
 in at least one branch of the leojislature. 
 
1787. NEW JEPwSEY CLAIMS EQUAL REPKESENTATIOK 231 
 
 CHAPTEE 11. 
 
 NEW JERSEY CLAIMS AN EQUAL KEPEESENTATION OF THE 
 
 STATES. 
 
 The Fifteenth to the Nineteenth of June 1787. 
 
 The plan of Yirginia divested the smaller states of the 
 equality of suffrage, wliicli they had enjoyed from the incep- 
 tion of the union. " See the consequence of pushing things 
 too far," said Dickinson to Madison ; the smaller states, though 
 some of their members, Hke himself and the delegates from 
 Connecticut, wished for a good national government with two 
 branches of the legislature, were compelled, in seK-def ence, to 
 fall back upon the articles of confederation.* 
 
 The project which in importance stands next to that of 
 Yirginia is the series of propositions of Connecticut. It con- 
 sisted of nine sections, and in the sessions of the convention 
 received the support of every one of the Connecticut delega- 
 tion, particularly of Sherman and Ellsworth. It was framed 
 while they were still contriving amendments of the articles of 
 the confederation.! It gave to the legislature of the United 
 
 *Gilpm, 863, note; Elliot, 191. 
 
 f Therefore, certainly, before 19 June, and probably soon after the arrival of 
 Sherman in Philadelphia. The Connecticut members were not chosen till Satur- 
 day, the twelfth of Hay. Ellsworth took his seat the twenty-eighth of May, Sher- 
 man the thirtieth, and Johnson the second of June. For the plan, see the Life of 
 Roger Sherman by Jeremiah Evarts, in Biography of the Signers, Ed. of 1828, 
 pp. 42-41. It may be that Sherman drew the paper ; but one of the articles cor- 
 responds with the sixth recommendation of a committee on which Ellsworth 
 served with Randolph in 1781 ; and is very similar to a proposition made in 1786 
 by a sub-committee of which Johnson was a member ; and another, the sixth, doca 
 no more than adopt the report of a committee of which Ellsworth was a member 
 with Hamilton and Madison in 1783. It is hard to say whether Sherman or EUs- 
 
232 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION". b. hi. ; ch. ii. 
 
 States the power over commerce with foreign nations and be- 
 tween the states in the union, with a revenue from customs 
 and the post-office. The United States were to make laws in 
 all cases which concerned their common interests ; but not to 
 interfere with the governments of the states in matters where- 
 in the general welfare of the United States is not affected. 
 The laws of the United States relating to their common inter- 
 ests were to be enforced bj the judiciary and executive officers 
 of the respective states. The United States were to institute 
 one supreme tribunal and other necessary tribunals, and to as- 
 certain their respective powers and jurisdiction. The individ- 
 ual states were forbidden to emit bills of credit for a currency, 
 or to make laws for the payment or discharge of debts or con- 
 tracts in any manner diifering from the agreement of the par- 
 ties, whereby foreigners and the citizens of other states might 
 be affected. The common treasury was to be supplied by the 
 several states in proportion to the whole number of white and 
 other free citizens and inhabitants and three fifths of all other 
 persons, except Indians not paying taxes, in each state. Should 
 any state neglect to furnish its quota of supplies, the United 
 States might levy and collect the same on the inhabitants of 
 such state. The United States might call forth aid from the 
 people to assist the civil officers in the execution of their laws. 
 The trial for a criminal offence must be by jury, and must take 
 place within the state in which the offence shall have been 
 committed. 
 
 The task of leading resistance to the large states fell to ISTew 
 Jersey. Paterson, one of its foremost statesmen, of Scotch- 
 Irish descent, brought from Ireland in infancy, a graduate of 
 Princeton, desired a thoroughly good general government. 
 Cheerful in disposition, playful in manner, and of an even 
 temper, he was undisturbed by resentments, and knew how to 
 bring back his friends from a disappointment to a good humor 
 with themselves and with the world.* In his present under- 
 
 ■worth was the prreatcst hater of paper money. Compare Gilpin, 1345, 1442; El- 
 liot, 435,485. For proof of their unity of action, compare tbcir joint letter from 
 New London, 26 September HSY, to Governor Huntington of Connecticut, in 
 Elliot, i., 491. 
 
 * Dayton to Tatcrson, 1 February ISOl. US. 
 
1787. NEW JERSEY CLAIMS EQUAL REPRESENTzVTION. 233 
 
 taking lie was obliged to call around liim a group of states 
 agreeing in almost nothing. New York, his strongest ally, 
 acted only from faction. New Jersey itself needed j^rotection 
 for its commerce against New York. Luther Martin could 
 bring the support of Maryland only in the absence of a ma- 
 jority of his colleagues. TJie people of Connecticut * saw the 
 need of a vigorous general government, with a legislature in 
 two branches. 
 
 The plan of New Jersey, which Paterson presented on the 
 fifteenth, was a revision of the articles of confederation. It 
 preserved a congress of states in a single body ; granted to the 
 United States a revenue from duties, stamps, and the post-office, 
 but nothing more except by requisitions ; established a plural 
 executive to be elected and to be removable by congress ; and 
 conferred on state courts original though not final jurisdiction 
 over infractions of United States laws.f 
 
 " The New Jersey system," said John Lansing J of New 
 York, on the sixteenth, " is federal ; the Virginia system, na- 
 tional. Li the first, the powers flow from the state governments ; 
 in the second, they derive authority from the people of the 
 states, and must ultimately annihilate the state governments. 
 We are invested only with power to alter and amend defective 
 parts of the present confederation." * 
 
 Now the powers granted by Virginia extended to " all fur- 
 ther provisions necessary to render the federal constitution 
 adequate to the exigencies of the Union." " Fully adequate," 
 were the still more energetic words of Pennsylvania. New 
 Jersey did not so much as name the articles of confedera- 
 tion ; while Connecticut limited the discussions of its dele- 
 gates only by "the general principles of republican govern- 
 ment." 1 
 
 The states, Lansing further insisted, would not ratify a 
 
 * Gilpin, S62, 863, Elliot, 191, note, wrongly classes New York and Connecti- 
 cut together. In conduct and intention the delegates of Connecticut were very 
 unlike Yates and Lansing. 
 
 f Paterson MSS. ; Elliot,!., 175-177; Gilpin, 8G3-8G7 ; Elliot, 191-193. 
 
 X Yates in Elliot, i., 411 ; compared v. ith Gilpin, 867 ; Elliot, 193 ; Paterson 
 MSS. 
 
 » Gilpin, 857 ; Elliot, 193 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 411. 
 
 I Journals of Congress, iv. Appendix. 
 
23i THE FEDERAL CONVENTION". b. iii. ; ch. n. 
 
 novel sclieme, wHle they would readily approve an augmenta- 
 tion of the familiar authority of congress.* 
 
 Paterson next spoke with the skill of a veteran advocate, 
 setting forth, "not his own opinions," as he frankly and re- 
 peatedly avowedjt but " the views of those who sent him." 
 
 " The system of government for the union wliicli I have pro- 
 posed accords with our own powers and with the sentiments of 
 the people, j^ If the subsisting confederation is so radically 
 defective as not to admit of amendment, let us report its in- 
 sufficiency and wait for enlarged powers. If no confederation 
 at present exists, all the states stand on the footing of equal 
 sovereignty ; and all must concur before any one can be bound.* 
 If a federal compact exists, an equal sovereignty is its basis ; 
 and the dissent of one state renders every proposed amendment 
 null. The confederation is in the nature of a compact ; and 
 can any state, unless by the consent of the whole, either in 
 politics or law, withdraw its powers ? The larger states con- 
 tribute most, but they have more to protect ; a rich state and 
 a poor state are in the same relation as a rich individual and a 
 poor one : tlie liberty of the latter must be preserved. Two 
 branches are not necessary in the supreme council of the states ; 
 the representatives from the several states are checks upon each 
 other. Give congress the same powers that are intended for 
 the two branches, and I apprehend they will act with more 
 energy and wisdom than the latter. Congress is the sun of our 
 political system." || 
 
 Wilson refuted Paterson by contrasting the two plans.^^ 
 " The congress of the confederacy," he continued, " is a single 
 legislature. Theory and practice both proclaim that in a single 
 house there is danger of a legislative despotism." ^ Cotesworth 
 Pinckney added : " The whole case comes to this : give ISTew 
 Jersey an equal vote, and she will dismiss her scruples and con- 
 cur in the national system." J 
 
 * Gilpin, 868, 859 ; Elliot, 194. 
 
 I Paterson MSS. The informants of England name Governor Livingston as 
 author of the system. X Gilpin, 8G9 ; Elliot, 194 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 412, 
 
 # Gilpin, r69; Elliot, 194. || Paterson MSS. 
 ^ Gilpin, 871 ; Elliot, 195 ; Elliot, i., 414 ; Paterson MSS. 
 
 Gilpin, 874 ; Elliot, 196. 
 
 ;f Gilpin, 875 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 415; Elliot, 197; Paterson MSS. 
 
1787. NEW JERSEY CLAIMS EQUAL REPRESENTATION. 235 
 
 " When tliQ salvation of the republic is at stake," said Ean- 
 dolpli, "it would be treason to our trust not to propose what 
 we find necessary.^' Tlie insufficiency of tbe federal plan has 
 been fully displayed by trial. The end of a general govern- 
 ment can be attained only by coercion, or by real legislation. 
 Coercion is impracticable, expensive, and cruel, and trains up 
 instruments for tlie service of ambition. We must resort to a 
 national legislation over individuals. To vest such power in 
 the congress of the confederation would be blending the legis- 
 lative with the executive. Elected by the legislatures who re- 
 tain even a power of recall, they are a mere diplomatic body, 
 with no will of their own, and always obsequious to the states 
 who are ever encroaching on the authority of the United States.f 
 A national government, properly constituted, will alone an- 
 swer the purpose ; and this is the only moment v/hen it can bo 
 established." if 
 
 On the morning of the eighteenth, Dickinson, to conciliate 
 the conflicting parties, induced the convention to proceed 
 through a revision of the articles of the confederation to a 
 government of the United States, adequate to the exigencies, 
 preservation, and prosperity of the union.* 
 
 Hamilton could no longer remain silent. Embarrassed by 
 the complete antagonism of both his colleagues, he yet insisted 
 that even the New York delegates need not doubt the ample 
 extent of their powers, and under them the right to the free 
 exercise of their judgment. The convention could only pro- 
 pose and recommend ; to ratify or reject remained " in the 
 states." II 
 
 Feeling that another ineffectual effort " would beget de- 
 spair," he spoke for " a solid plan without regard to temporary 
 opinions." " Our choice," he said, " is to engraft powers on 
 the present confederation, or to form a new government with 
 complete sovereignty." ^ He set forth the vital defects of the 
 confederacy, and that it could not be amended except by in- 
 vesting it with most im.portant powers. To do so would estab- 
 
 * Gilpin, 876 ; Elliot, 197 ; Paterson MSS. f Gilpin, 876, 877 ; Elliot, 198. 
 t Yates in Elliot, i., 4-17; Gilpin, 877-879 ; Elliot, 198 ; Paterson MSS. 
 
 * Gilpin, 878 ; Elliot, 198. || Yates in Elliot, i., 418. 
 •^Hamilton's Vy''orks, ii., 410. 
 
236 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; ch. ii. 
 
 lish a general government in one hand without checks ; a sov- 
 ereignty of the worst kind, the sovereignty of a single body. 
 This is a conclusive objection to the Jersey plan.* 
 
 " I have great doubts," he continued, " whether a national 
 government on the Virginia plan can be effectual. f Gentle- 
 men say we need to be rescued from the democracy. But 
 what are the means proposed ? A democratic assembly is to be 
 checked by a democratic senate, and both these by a democratic 
 chief magistrate. J The Yirginia plan is but pork still with a 
 little change of the sauce.* It will prove inefficient, because 
 the means vail not be equal to the object. || 
 
 "The general government must not only have a strong 
 Boul, but strong organs by which that soul is to operate.^ I 
 despair that a republican form of government can remove the 
 difficulties ; I would hold it, however, unwise to change it. ^ 
 The best form of government, not attainable by us, but the 
 model to which we should approach as near as possible, J is 
 the British constitution, ^ praised by Xecker as ' the only gov- 
 ernment which unites public strength with individual se- 
 curity.' t Its house of lords is a most noble institution. It 
 forms a permanent barrier against every pernicious innovation, 
 whether attempted on the part of the crown or of the com- 
 mons.** 
 
 " It seems to be admitted that no good executive can be 
 established upon republican principles.ff The English model 
 is the only good one. The British executive is placed above 
 temptation, and can have no interest distinct from the public 
 welfare. :j::j: The mference from these observations is, that, to 
 obtain stability and permanency, we ought to go to the full 
 length that republican principles will admit.** And the govern- 
 ment will be republican so long as all officers are appointed by 
 
 *nannlton's Works, ii., 412 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 420, 421. 
 
 f Yates in Elliot, i., 417. t Hamilton, ii., 415. 
 
 # Yates in Elliot, i., 423 ; Gilpin, 893, note ; Elliot, 205. 
 
 I Hamilton, ii., 415. ^ Hamilton, ii., 413. 
 
 ^ Yates in Elliot, i., 421. % Hamilton, ii., 413. 
 
 i Yates in Elliot, i., 421 ; Hamilton, ii., 413. ± Gilpin, 886 ; Elliot, 202. 
 
 *« Gilpin, 8S6, 887 ; Elliot, 203. ff Gilpin, 887 ; Elliot, 203. 
 
 Xt Yates in Elliot, i., 422. 
 
 *» Gilpin, 888 ; Elliot, 2C3 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 422. 
 
1787. NEW JERSEY CLAIMS EQUAL REPEESENTATIOK 237 
 
 the people, or by a process of election originating with the 
 people." 
 
 Hamilton then read and commented on his sketch of a con- 
 stitntion for the United States. It planted no one branch of 
 the general government on the states ; but, by methods even 
 more national than that of the Virginia plan, derived them all 
 from the people. 
 
 The assembly, which was to be the corner-stone of the edi- 
 fice, was to consist of persons elected directly by the people for 
 three years. It was to be checked by a senate elected by elect- 
 ors chosen by the people,* and holding office during good be- 
 havior. The supreme executive, whose term of office was to 
 be good behavior, was to be elected by electors, chosen by elect- 
 ors, chosen by the people.f " It may be said," these were his 
 words, " this constitutes an elective monarchy ; but by making 
 the executive subject to impeachment the term monarchy can 
 not apply." :j: The courts of the United States were so insti- 
 tuted as to place the general government above the state 
 governments in all matters of general concern.* To prevent 
 the states from passing laws contrary to the constitution or 
 laws of the United States, the executive of each state was to be 
 appointed by the general government with a negative on all 
 state legislation. 
 
 Hamilton spoke, not to refer a proposition to the com- 
 mittee, but only to present his own ideas, and to indicate the 
 amendments v/hich he might offer to the Yirginia plan. He 
 saw evils operating in the states which must soon cure the 
 people of their fondness for democracies, and unshackle them 
 from their prejudices ; so that they would be ready to go as far at 
 least as he had suggested. || But for the moment he held it the 
 duty of the convention to balance inconveniences and dangers, 
 and choose that which seemed to have the fewest objections."^ 
 
 Hamilton "was praised by everybody, but supported by 
 none." () It was not the good words for the monarchy of 
 
 I think Hamilton meant the choice of electors to be made by the landholders ; 
 pee his fuller plan, written out by himself and given to Madison near the close of 
 the convention. The senate of New York was so chosen. 
 
 f Elliot, i., 179. X Yates in Elliot, i., 422. # Ibid., 423. 
 
 I Gilpin, 890 ; Elliot, 2C4. ^ Hamilton, ii., 415. () Yates in Elliot, i , 431. 
 
238 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION b. hi. ; en. ii. 
 
 Great Britain that enstranged Lis hearers. Hamilton did not 
 go far beyond the language of Randolph,* or Dickinson,f or 
 Gerry, :j: or Charles Piuckney.* The attachment to monarchy 
 in the United States had not been consumed by vobanic fire ; 
 it had disappeared because there was nothing left in them to 
 keep it alive. The nation imperceptibly and without bitter- 
 ness outgrew its old habits of thought. Gratitude for the revo- 
 lution of 1G88 still threw a halo round the house of lords. But 
 Hamilton, finding a home in the United States only after his 
 mind was near maturity, did not cherish toward the states the 
 feeling of those who were bom and bred on the soil, and had 
 received into their affections the thought and experience of the 
 preceding generation. His speech called forth from many 
 sides the liveliest defence of the rights of the states. 
 
 On the nineteenth the convention in committee rejected the 
 milder motion of Dickinson ; and, after an exhaustive analysis 
 by Madison || of the defects in the New Jersey plan, they re- 
 ported the amended plan of Yirginia by the vote of the six na- 
 tional states, aided by the vote of Connecticut.^ 
 
 * Gilpin, 763 ; Elliot, 141. f Gilpin, 118 ; Elliot, 148. 
 
 X Yates in Elliot, i., 408. * Gilpin, 947 ; ElUot, 234. 
 
 II Gilpin, 89;i ; Elliot, 206. 
 
 ^ Gilpin, 904 ; Elliot, 212 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 425. 
 
178T. THE CONNECTICUT COMPPwOMISE. 239 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE CONNECTICUT COMPKOIvnSE. 
 
 Feom 19 June to 2 July 1787. 
 
 The convention, whicli had sliown itseK so resolute for 
 consolidating the union, next bethought itself of home rule. 
 In reply to what had fallen from Hamilton, Wilson said, on the 
 nineteenth of June : " I am for a national government, but not 
 one that will swallow up the state governments ; these are abso- 
 lutely necessary for purposes which the national government 
 cannot reach." 
 
 " I did not intend yesterday," exclaimed Hamilton, " a total 
 extinguishment of state governments ; but that a national gov- 
 ernment must have indefinite sovereignty ; for if it were lim- 
 ited at all, the rivalship of the states would gradually subvert 
 it.* The states must retain subordinate jurisdictions." f '* If 
 the states," said King, " retain some portion of their sovereign- 
 ty, they have certainly divested themselves of essential portions 
 of it. If, in some respects, they form a confederacy, in others 
 they form a nation." 
 
 Martin held that the separation from Great Britain placed 
 the thirteen states in a state of nature toward each other. J 
 This Wilson denied, saying : " In the declaration of independ- 
 ence the united colonies were declared to be free and independ- 
 ent states, independent, not individually, but unitedly." * 
 
 Connecticut, which was in all sincerity partly federal and 
 partly national, was now compelled to take the lead. As a 
 
 * Gilpin, 904; Elliot, 212. X Gi'piu, 906, 907; Elliot, 213. 
 
 f Yctcs in Elliot, i., 426. » Gilpin, 907 ; Elliot, 213. 
 
240 THE FEDERAL C0NVENTI02T. b. hi. ; en. m. 
 
 state she was tlie most homogeneous and the most fixed in 
 the character of her consociate churches and her complete sys- 
 tem of home government. Her delegation to the convention 
 was thrice remarkable : they had precedence in age ; in experi- 
 ence, from 1776 to 1786 on committees to frame or amend a 
 constitution for the country ; and in illustrating the force of 
 religion in human life. 
 
 Eoger Sherman was a unique man. "No one in the conven- 
 tion had had so large experience in legislating for the United 
 States. Next to Franklin the oldest man in the convention, 
 like FrankHn he had had no education but in the common 
 school of his birthplace hard by Boston ; and as the one learned 
 the trade of a tallow-chandler, so the other had been appren- 
 ticed to a shoemaker. 
 
 Left at nineteen an orphan on the father's side, he minis- 
 tered to his mother during her long life ; and having suffered 
 from the want of a liberal education, he provided it for his 
 younger brothers. Hesolved to conquer poverty, at the age of 
 two-and-twenty he wrapped himself in his own manliness, and, 
 bearing with him the tools of his trade, he migrated on foot to 
 New Milford, in Connecticut, where he gained a living by his 
 craft or by trade, until in December 1754, after careful study, 
 he was admitted to the bar. 
 
 There was in him kind-heartedness and industry, penetra- 
 tion and close reasoning, an unclouded intellect, superiority to 
 passion, intrepid patriotism, solid judgment, and a directness 
 which went straight to its end ; so that the country people 
 among whom he lived, first at New Milford and then at New 
 Haven, gave him every possible sign of their confidence. The 
 church made him its deacon ; Yale college its treasurer ; New 
 Haven its representative, and, when it became a city, its first 
 mayor, re-electing him as long as he lived. For nineteen years 
 he was annually chosen one of the fourteen assistants, or upper 
 house of the legislature ; and for twenty-three years a judge of 
 the court of common pleas, or of the superior court. 
 
 A plurality of offices being then allowed, Sherman Vv^as 
 sent to the first congress in 1774, and to every other congress 
 to the last hour of his life, except when excluded by the funda- 
 mental law of rotation. In congress he served on most of the 
 
1787. THE CONNECTICUT COMPKOMISE. 2^1 
 
 important committees, the board of war, the board of the ma- 
 rine, the board of finance. He signed the declaration of 1774, 
 which some writers regard as the date of our nationality ; was 
 of the committee to write, and was a signer of the declaration 
 of independence ; was of the committee to frame the articles 
 of the confederation, and a signer of that instniment. No one 
 is known to have complained of his filling too many offices, or 
 to have found fault with the manner in which he filled them. 
 In the convention he never made long speeches, but would 
 intuitively seize on the turning-point of a question, and pre- 
 sent it in terse language which showed his own opinion and 
 the strength on which it rested. 
 
 By the side of Sherman stood William Samuel Johnson, 
 then sixty years of age. He took his first degree at Yale, his 
 second, after a few months' further study, at Harvard ; became 
 a representative in the Connecticut assembly ; was a delegate 
 to the stamp-act congress of 1765, and assisted in writing its 
 address to the king. He became the able and faithful agent 
 of his state in England, where Oxford made him a doctor of 
 civil law. After his return in 1771, he was chosen one of the 
 fourteen assistants, and one of the judges of the superior court. 
 He was sent by Connecticut on a peace mission to Gage at 
 Boston; but from the war for independence he kept aloof. 
 His state, nevertheless, appointed him its leading counsel in its 
 territorial disputes with Pennsylvania. A delegate to the fifth 
 congress and the sixth, he acted in 1786 on a grand committee 
 and its sub-committee for reforming the federal government. 
 He had just been unanimously chosen president of Columbia 
 college. His calm and conservative character made him tardy 
 in coming up to a new position, so that he had even opposed 
 the call of the federal convention.* He was of good-humor, 
 composedness, and candor, and he knew how to conciliate and 
 to convince. 
 
 The third member of the Connecticut delegation was 
 Oliver Ellsworth, whom we have seen on the committee of 
 1781 for amending the constitution, and on the committee of 
 1783 for addressing the states in behaK of further reforms. A 
 native of Connecticut, he ^vas at Yale for two years, and in 
 
 * Gale to Johnson, 19 Apiil 1787 ; Gilpin, 5S9 ; Elliot, 96. 
 VOL. VI. — 16 
 
242 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. ni. ; en. iii. 
 
 1766, after two years more of study, graduated in the college 
 of JSTew Jersey, where Luther Martin was his classmate. Of a 
 robust habit of mind, he was full of energy and by nature 
 hopeful ; devoid of sentimentality and safe against the seduc- 
 tions of feeling or the delusions of imagination, he was always 
 self-possessed. Free from rancor and superior to flattery, he 
 could neither be intimidated nor cajoled. His mind advanced 
 cautiously, but with great moving force. Knowing what he 
 needed, he could not be turned from its pursuit ; obtaining it, 
 he never wrangled for more. He had been the attorney of his 
 own state, a member of its assembly, one of its delegates in con- 
 gress, a colleague of Sherman in its superior court ; and now, 
 at the age of two-and-forty, rich in experience, he becomes 
 one of the chief workmen in framing the federal constitution. 
 
 By Paterson, in his notes for a 'New Jersey plan, the pro- 
 posed new government was named ^' the federal government of 
 the United States ; " by Dickinson, in his resolution, " the gov- 
 ernment of the United States." In the Virginia plan it was 
 described as "national" nineteen times, and in the report from 
 the convention in committee of the whole to the house, twenty- 
 six times. Ellsworth, who then and ever after did not scruple 
 to use the word " national," moved to substitute in the amended 
 Yirginia plan the phrase of Dickinson as the proper title.* 
 To avoid alarm, the friends to the national plan unhesitatingly 
 accepted the colorless change.f Lansing then moved " that 
 the powers of legislation ought to be vested in the United 
 States in congress." He dwelt again on the want of power in 
 the convention, the probable disapprobation of their constitu- 
 ents, the consequent dissolution of the union, the inability of 
 a general government to pervade the whole continent, the dan- 
 ger of complicating the British model of government with 
 state governments on principles which would gradually destroy 
 the one or the other. 
 
 "** Mason protested against a renewed agitation of the question 
 between the two plans, and against the objection of a want of 
 ample powers in the convention; with impassioned wisdom, 
 he continued : 
 
 " On two points the American mind is well settled : an at- 
 
 * Gilpin, 90S, 909 ; Elliot, 214. f Martin in Elliot, i., 3G2. 
 
1787. THE CONNECTICUT COMPROMISE. 243 
 
 tachmeiit to republican government, and an attacliment to more 
 than one branch in the legislature. The general accord of 
 their constitutions in both these circumstances must either have 
 been a miracle, or must have resulted from the genius of the 
 people. Congress is the only single legislature not chosen by 
 the people themselves, and in consequence they have been con- 
 stantly averse to giving it further powers. They never will, 
 they never can, intrust their dearest rights and liberties to one 
 body of men not chosen by them, and yet invested with the 
 sword and the purse ; a conclave, transacting their business in 
 secret and guided in many of their acts by factions and party 
 spirit. It is acknowledged by the author of the l^^ew Jersey 
 plan that it cannot be enforced without military coercion. The 
 most jarring elements of nature, fire and water, are not more 
 incompatible than such a mixture of civil liberty and military 
 execution. 
 
 " E'ot with standing my solicitude to establish a national gov- 
 ernment, I never will agree to abolish the state governments, 
 or render them absolutely insignificant. They are as necessary 
 as the general government, and I shall be equally careful to 
 preserve them. I am aware of the difiiculty of drawing the 
 line between the two, but hope it is not insurmountable. 
 That the one government will be productive of disputes and jeal- 
 ousies against the other, I believe ; but it wdll produce mutual 
 safety. The convention cannot make a faultless government ; 
 but I will trust posterity to mend its defects." * 
 
 The day ended in a definitive refusal to take up the propo- 
 sition of Lansing; the six national states standing together 
 against the three federal ones and Connecticut, Maryland being 
 divided. The four southernmost states aimed at no selfish ad- 
 vantages, when in this hour of extreme danger they came to 
 the rescue of the union. Moreover, the people of Maryland 
 were by a large majority on the side of the national states, and 
 the votes of Connecticut and Delaware were given only to pave 
 the way to an equal vote in the senate. 
 
 Weary of supporting the E'ev/ Jersey plan, Sherman f 
 pleaded for tv/o houses of the national legislature and an equal 
 
 * Gilpin, 912-915 ; Elliot, 216, 217 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 428, 429. 
 f Gilpin, 918; Elliot, 219. 
 
244 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; oh. m. 
 
 vote of tlie states in one of tliem. On the next morning John- 
 son * took up the theme. Avoiding every appearance of dic- 
 tation, he invited the convention to harmonize the individnaht j 
 of the states as proposed by New Jersey with the general sov- 
 ereignty and jurisdiction of the Virginia plan. He wished it 
 to be well considered, whether the portion of sovereignty which 
 was to remain with the states could be preserved without allow- 
 ing them in the second branch of the national legislature a dis- 
 tinct and equal vote. 
 
 The six national states, re-enforced by Connecticut, then 
 resolved f that the general legislature should consist of two 
 branches. Upon this decision, which was carried by more than 
 two states to one, the ISTew Jersey plan fell hopelessly to the 
 ground. 
 
 It was on the twenty-fifth, in the course of these debates, 
 that Wilson said : " "VThen I consider the amazing extent of 
 country, the immense population which is to fill it, the influ- 
 ence which the government we are to form will have, not only 
 on the present generation of our people and their multiplied 
 posterity, but on the whole globe, I am lost in the magnitude 
 of the object. J "We are laying the foundation of a building 
 in which millions are interested, and which is to last for ages.* 
 In laying one stone amiss we may injure the superstructure ; 
 and what will be the consequence if the comer-stone should be 
 loosely placed ? A citizen of America is a citizen of the gen- 
 eral government, and is a citizen of the particular state in which 
 he may reside. 1 The general government is meant for them 
 in the first capacity; the state governments in the second. 
 Both governments are derived from the people, both meant 
 for the people ; both, therefore, ought to be regulated on the 
 same principles.'*' In forming the general government we 
 must forget our local habits and attachments, lay aside our 
 state connections, and act for the general good of the whole. () 
 The general government is not an assemblage of states, but of 
 
 * Gilpin, 920 ; Elliot, 220 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 431. 
 t Gilpin, 925 ; Elliot, 223 ; i., 184 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 432. 
 i Gilpin, 956 ; Elliot, 289. » Yates in Elliot, i., 446. 
 
 II Yates in Elliot, i., 445, 446. ^ Gilpin, 956 ; Elliot, 239. 
 
 ^ Yates in Elliot, i., 446. 
 
1787. THE CONNECTICUT COMPPwOMISE. 245 
 
 individuals, for certain political purposes ; it is not meant for 
 the states, but for the individuals composing them ; the indi- 
 viduals, therefore, not the states, ought to be represented in 
 it." * He persisted to the last in demanding that the senate 
 should be elected bj electors chosen by the people. 
 
 Ellsworth replied : " Whether the member of the senate 
 be appointed by the people or by the legislature, he will be a 
 citizen of the state he is to represent. Every state has its par- 
 ticular views and prejudices, which will find their way into the 
 general council, through whatever channel they may flow, f 
 The state legislatures are more competent to make a judicious 
 choice than the people at large. Without the existence and 
 co-operation of the states, a repubhcan government cannot be 
 supported over so great an extent of country. We know that 
 the people of the states are strongly attached to their own con- 
 stitutions. If you hold up a system of general government, 
 destructive of their constitutional rights, they will oppose it. 
 The only chance we have to support a general government is 
 to graft it on the state governments." :j: 
 
 That the members of the second branch should be chosen 
 by the individual legislatures, which in the committee had been 
 unanimously accepted, was then affirmed in convention by all 
 the states except Pennsylvania and Virginia, which looked 
 upon this mode of choice as the stepping-stone to an equal 
 representation.* 
 
 For the term of office of the senators, who, as all agreed, 
 were to go out in classes, Eandolph proposed seven years ; 
 Cotesworth Pinckney, four; Gorham and Wilson, six with 
 biennial rotation. Read desired the tenure of good behavior, 
 but, hardly finding a second, || moved for a term of nine years 
 as the longest which had a chance for support. 
 
 Madison came to his aid. " The second branch, as a lim- 
 ited number of citizens, respectable for wisdom and virtue, 
 will be watched by and will keep watch over the representa- 
 tives of the people ; it will seasonably interpose between im- 
 petuous counsels ; and will guard the minority who are placed 
 
 * Gilpin, 957 ; Elliot, 2S9. f Ibid. 1;. Yates in Elliot, i., 44G, 447. 
 
 * Gilpin, 959; Elliot, 240; Yates in Elliot, i., 447. 
 
 ji Con:ipare Gilpin, 960, or Elliot, 241, with Yates in Elliot, i., 448. 
 
246 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; en. iii. 
 
 above indigence against the agrarian attempts of the ever- 
 increasing class who labor nnder all the hardships of life, and 
 secretly sigh for a more equal distribution of its blessings. The 
 longer the members of the senate continue in office, the better 
 will these objects be answered. The term of nine years can 
 threaten no real danger." ^ 
 
 Sherman replied : " The more permanency a government 
 has, the worse, if it be a bad one. I shall be content with six 
 years for the senate : but four will be quite sufficient." f 
 
 " We are now to decide the fate of republican government," 
 said Hamilton ; " if we do not give to that form due stability, 
 it will be disgraced and lost among ourselves, disgraced and lost 
 to mankind forever. :j: I acknowledge I do not think favor- 
 ably of republican government ; but I address my remarks to 
 those who do, in order to prevail on them to tone their gov- 
 ernment as high as possible. I profess myself as zealous an 
 advocate for liberty as any man whatever ; and trust I shall be 
 as willing a martyr to it, though I differ as to the form in 
 which it is most eligible. Eeal liberty is neither found in 
 despotism nor in the extremes of democracy, but in moderate 
 governments.* Those who mean to form a solid republic 
 ought to proceed to the confines of another government. If 
 we incline too much to democracy, we shall soon shoot into a 
 monarchy." The term of nine years received only the votes of 
 Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Virginia ; and that for six years, 
 with the biennial renewal of one third of its members, was 
 carried by the voice of seven states against four. || 
 
 On the twenty-seventh, Rutledge brought the convention 
 to consider the rule of suffrage in the two branches of the 
 national legislature. For the rest of the day, and part of the 
 next, Martin vehemently denounced any general government 
 that could reach individuals, and intimated plainly that Clin- 
 ton of New York would surely prevent its adoption in that 
 state. Lansing renewed the proposal to vote by states in the 
 first branch of the legislature. Madison summed up a most 
 
 * Gilpin, 934 ; Elliot, 242, 242 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 450. 
 f Gilpin, 965 ; Elliot, 243 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 450. 
 i Gilpin, 985, 966 ; Elliot, 244. « Yates in Elliot, i., 450. 
 II Gilpin, 969 ; Elliot, 245 ; i., 451. 
 
1787. THE CONNECTICUT COMPROMISE. 247 
 
 elaborate statement bj saying : " Tlie two extremes before lis 
 are, a perfect separation, and a perfect incorporation of the 
 thirteen states. In the first case, thej will be independent 
 nations, subject only to the law of nations ; in the last, they 
 will be mere counties of one entire republic, subject to one 
 common law. In the first, the smaller states will have every- 
 thing to fear from the larger ; in the last, nothing. Their true 
 policy, therefore, hes in promoting that form of government 
 which will most approximate the states to the condition of 
 counties." * Johnson and Sherman and Ellsworth, Paterson 
 and Dickinson, even at the risk of union, opposed King, the 
 most eloquent orator, "VYilson, the most learned civilian, and 
 Madison, the most careful statesman, of the convention. It 
 was in vain for the smaller states to say they intended no 
 injustice, and equally in vain for Madison to plead that the 
 large states, from differing customs, religion, and interests, 
 could never unite in perilous combinations. In the great diver- 
 sity of sentiment, Johnson could not foresee the result of their 
 deliberations ; f and at a later day Martin reported that the 
 convention was " on the verge of dissolution, scarce held to- 
 gether by the strength of a hair." J 
 
 To restore calm, Franklin, just as the house was about to 
 adjourn, proposed that the convention should be opened every 
 morning by prayer. Having present in his mind his own mar- 
 vellous career from the mocking skepticism of his boyhood, he 
 said : " The longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see 
 that God governs in the affairs of men. I firmly believe that 
 * except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build 
 it.' Without his concurring aid, we shall be divided by our 
 little local interests, succeed no better than the builders of 
 Babel, and become a reproach and by-word to future ages. 
 "What is worse, mankind may hereafter, from this unfortunate 
 instance, despair of establishing government by human wis- 
 dom, and leave it to chance and war." * The motion was 
 avoided by adjournment. 
 
 The concurring aid which Franklin invoked implied a 
 
 * Gilpin, 982 ; Elliot, 252. 
 
 f William Samuel Johnson to his son, Philadelphia, 27 June l^ST. 
 
 i Elliot, i., 358. * Gilpin, 985 ; Elliot, 253, 254. 
 
218 THE FEDEKAL CONVENTIOJ^. b. hi. ; en. m. 
 
 purification from the dominion of selfish, interests. In the 
 next meeting the members were less absorbed by inferior 
 motives.* The debate was opened by Johnson. " A state," 
 he said, " exists as a political society, and it exists as a district 
 of individual citizens. The aristocratic and other interests, 
 and the interests of the states, must be armed with some 
 power of self-defence. In one branch of the general govern- 
 ment the people ought to be represented; in the other, the 
 states." t Gorham brought together arguments for union 
 alike from the point of view of small and of large states; 
 and his last word was : " A union of the states is necessary to 
 their happiness, and a firm general government is necessary 
 to their union. I will stay here as long as any state will re- 
 main, in order to agree on some plan that can be recommended 
 to the people." J 
 
 " I do not despair," said Ellsworth ; " I stiU trust that some 
 good plan of government will be devised and adopted." 
 
 "If this point of representation is once well fixed," said 
 Madison, "we shall come nearer to one another in sentiment.* 
 The necessity will then be discovered of circumscribing more 
 effectually the state governments, and enlarging the bounds of 
 the general government. There is a gradation from the small- 
 est corporation with the most limited powers to the largest 
 empire with the most perfect sovereignty. || The states never 
 possessed the essential rights of sovereignty; these were al- 
 ways vested in congress. Voting as states in congress is no 
 evidence of sovereignty. The state of Maryland voted by 
 counties. Did this make the counties sovereign ? The states, 
 at present, are only great corporations, having the power of 
 making by-laws not contradictory to the general confedera- 
 tion.^ The proposed government will have powers far be- 
 yond those exercised by the British parliament when the 
 states were part of the British empire. 
 
 " The mixed nature of the government ought to be kept 
 in view ; but the exercise of an equal voice by unequal por- 
 tions of the people is confessedly unjust, and would infuse 
 
 ^'' Compare Walter Scott in Tho Heart of Midlothian, vol. i., chap. xiv. 
 
 
 f Gilpin, 937 ; Elliot, 255. 
 
 X Gilpin, 989 ; Elliot, 255. 
 
 
 # Elliot, i., 4G1. 1! Gilpin, 990 ; Elliot, 25G. 
 
 ^ Yates in Elliot, i., 4S1. 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
1787. THE CONNECTICUT COMPROMISE. 249 
 
 mortality into the constitution whicli we wish to last for- 
 ever. A total sej)aration of the states from each other or 
 partial confederacies would alike be truly deplorable; and 
 those who may be accessory to either can never be forgiven 
 by their country, nor by themselves." * 
 
 " In all the states," said Hamilton, " the rights of individu- 
 als with regard to suffrage are modified by qualifications of 
 property. In like manner states may modify their right of 
 su&age, the larger exercising a larger, the smaller a smaller 
 share of it. Will the people of Delaware be less free if each 
 citizen has an equal vote with each citizen of Pennsylvania ? 
 The contest is for power, not for liberty. 
 
 " No government can give us happiness at home which has 
 not the strength to make us respectable abroad. This is the 
 critical moment for forming such a government. As yet we 
 retain the habits of union. We are weak, and sensible of our 
 weakness. Our people are disposed to have a good govern- 
 ment ;t but henceforward the motives will become feebler 
 and the difficulties greater. It is a miracle that we are now 
 here, exercising free deliberation; it would be madness to 
 trust to future miracles.:]: Yv^e must therefore improve the 
 opportunity, and render the present system as perfect as pos- 
 sible. The good sense of the people, and, above all, the ne- 
 cessity of their affairs, will induce them to adopt it." * 
 
 It was then decided, by the six national states to four, 
 Maryland being divided, that the rule of suffrage in the first 
 branch ought to bear proportion to the population of the 
 several states. A reversal of this decision was never at- 
 tempted. 
 
 Ellsworth now put forth all his strength as he moved that 
 in the second branch the vote should be taken by states : | "I 
 confess that the effect of this motion is to make the general 
 government partly federal and partly national. I am not sorry 
 that the vote just passed has determined against this rule in 
 the first branch; I hope it will become a ground of com- 
 promise with regard to the second. On this middle ground, 
 
 " Gilpin, 990, 992 ; Elliot, 256, 257 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 462. 
 
 f Yates in Elliot, i., 463. X Gilpin, 995 ; Elliot, 259. 
 
 # Yates in Elliot, i., 464. j| Yates in Elliot, i., 464. 
 
250 THE FEDERAL CONYENTIOK b. iii. ; oh. iii. 
 
 and on no other, can a compromise take place.* If the great 
 states refuse this plan, we shall be forever separated. 
 
 " In the hour of common danger we united as equals ; is 
 it just to depart from this principle now, when the danger is 
 over ? f The existing confederation is founded on the equalit}^ 
 of the states in the article of suffrage, :j: and is declared to be 
 perpetual.* Is it meant to pay no regard to this plighted 
 faith ? II "We then associated as free and independent states. 
 To perpetuate that independence, I wish to establish a national 
 legislature, executive, and judiciary ; for under these we shall 
 preserve peace and harmony." ^ 
 
 Abraham Baldwin, a native of Connecticut, a graduate of 
 Yale college, for four years one of its tutors, a recent emigrant 
 to Georgia, from which state he was now a deputy, stepped 
 forth to the relief of Ellsworth, saying : " The second branch 
 ought to be the representation of property,^ and ought not to 
 be elected as the first." J 
 
 '' If a minority will have their own will, or separate the 
 union," said Wilson, on the thirtieth, " let it be done. I can- 
 not consent that one fourth shall control the power of three 
 fourths. The Connecticut proposal removes only a part of 
 the objection. We all aim at giving the general government 
 more energy. The state governments are necessary and valu- 
 able. Ko liberty can be obtained without them. On this 
 question of the manner of taking the vote in the second 
 branch depend the essential rights of the general govern- 
 ment and of the people." $ 
 
 Ellsworth replied : " No salutary measure has been lost for 
 want of a majority of the states to favor it. J If the larger 
 states seek security, they have it fully in the first branch 
 of the general government. Eut are the lesser states equally 
 secure? We are razing the foundation of the building, 
 when we need only repair the roof.** And let it be remem- 
 bered that these remarks are not the result of partial or locSl 
 
 * Gilpin, 998, 921 ; Elliot, 200. ^ Yates in Elliot, i., 465. 
 
 f Elliot, i., 464, 465. Gilpin, 998 ; Elliot, 260. 
 
 i Gilpin, 998 ; Elliot, 200. ^1; Yates in Elliot, i., 465. 
 
 * Yates in Elliot, i. ,465. i Yates in Elliot, i., 466, 467. 
 II Gilpin, 998 ; Elliot, 260. i Gilpin, 1003 ; Elliot, 263. 
 ** Gilpin, 1003 ; Elliot, 263 ; Yates in Elliot, !., 468. 
 
178T. THE CONNECTICUT COMPEOMISE. 251 
 
 views. In importance, tlie state I represent liolds a middle 
 rank." * 
 
 " If there was real danger to the smaller states," said Madi- 
 son, ^^I would give them defensive v/eapons. But there is 
 none. The great danger to our general government is, that 
 the southern and northern interests of the continent are op- 
 posed to each other, f not from their difference of size, but 
 from climate, and principally from the effects of their having 
 or not having slaves, if Look to the votes in congress ; most 
 of them stand divided by the geography of the country, not by 
 the size of the states.* Defensive power ought to be given, 
 not between the large and small states, but between the north- 
 em and southern. Casting about in my mind for some expe- 
 dient that will answer this purpose, it has occurred that the 
 states should be represented in one branch according to the 
 number of free inhabitants only ; and in the other according to 
 the whole number, counting the slaves as free. The southern 
 scale would have the advantage in one house, and the northern 
 in another." \\ By this willingness to recede from the strict 
 claim to representation in proportion to population for the 
 sake of protecting slavery, Madison stepped from firm ground. 
 The argument of Ellsworth drawn from the faith plighted to 
 the smaller states in the existing federal compact, he answered 
 only by taunts : " The party claiming from others an adhe- 
 rence to a common engagement ought at least to be itself guilt- 
 less of its violation. Of all the states, Connecticut is perhaps 
 least able to urge this plea." ^ 
 
 Fixing his eyes on "Washington, Ellsworth rejoined : " To 
 you I can with confidence appeal for the great exertions of my 
 state during the w^ar in supplying both men and money. (} 
 The muster rolls will show that she had more troops in the 
 field than even the state of Virginia. J We strained every 
 nerve to raise them ; and we spared neither money nor exer- 
 tions to complete our quotas. This extraordinary exertion has 
 
 * Gilpin, 1001 ; Elliot, 264. 
 
 f Yates in Elliot, i., 405, 483. :j: Gilpin, 1006 ; Elliot, 2G1-. 
 
 * Yates in Elliot, i., 466. The date in Madison is 30 June. 
 
 II Gilpin, 1006 ; Elliot, 264, 265. a Gilpin, 1005 ; Elliot, 254. 
 
 Gilpin, 1007 ; Elliot, 265. J Yates in Elliot, i., 469. 
 
252 THE FEDERAL CONYENTIOK b. hi. ; on. iii. 
 
 greatly impoverished us, and lias accumulated our state debts ; 
 but we defy any gentleman to show that we ever refused a 
 federal requisition. If she has proved delinquent through ina- 
 bility only, it is not more than others have been without the 
 same excuse. It is the ardent wish of the state to strengthen 
 the federal government." ''^ 
 
 Davie of JN'orth Carolina, breaking the phalanx of national 
 states, preferred the proposition of Ellsworth to the propor- 
 tional representation, Avhich would in time make the senate a 
 multitudinous body.f Connecticut had won the day. 
 
 Startled by the appearance of defeat, Wilson hastily offered 
 to the smallest states one senator, to the others one for every 
 hundred thousand souls. This expedient Franklin brushed aside, 
 saymg : " On a proportional representation the small states con- 
 tend that their liberties will be in danger ; with an equality of 
 votes, the large states say their money will be in danger. A join- 
 er, when he wants to fit two boards, takes a little from both." J 
 And he suggested for the several states a Hke number of dele- 
 gates to the senate, with proportionate votes on financial sub- 
 jects, equal votes on questions affecting the rights of the states. 
 
 King inveighed against the " phantom of state sovereign- 
 ty : " " If the adherence to an equality of votes is unalterable, 
 we are cut asunder already. My mind is prepared for every 
 event, rather than to sit down under a government which 
 must be as short-lived as it would be unjust." * 
 
 Dayton replied : " Assertion for proof and terror for argu- 
 ment, however eloquently spoken, will have no effect. It 
 should have been shown that the evils we have experienced 
 proceeded from the equality of representation." 
 
 "The plan in its present shape," said Madison, "makes 
 the senate absolutely dependent on the states ; it is, therefore, 
 only another edition of the old confederation, and can never 
 answer. Still I would preserve the state rights as carefully as 
 the trial by jury." \\ 
 
 * Yates in Elliot, i., 4C9, 4-70. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1007 ; Elliot 265, 2G6 ; Yates in Elliot, i., 470 ; Paterson MS. 
 
 t Gilpin, 1009; Elliot, 266; Yates in Elliot, i., 471. 
 
 *= Gilpin, 1010, 1011 ; Elliot, 266, 267. 
 
 J! Gilpin, 1012 ; Elliot, 267 ; Yates in ElUot, i., 471. 
 
irsr. THE CONNECTICUT COMPROMISE. 253 
 
 Bedford scoffed at Georgia, proud of her future greatness ; 
 at South Carolina, puffed up with wealth and negroes ; at the 
 great states, ambitious, dictatorial, and unworthy of trust ; and 
 defied them to dissolve the confederation, for ruin would then 
 stare them in the face.* 
 
 To a question from King, whether by entering into a na- 
 tional government he would not equally participate in national 
 security, Ellsworth answered : " I confess I should ; but a gen- 
 eral government cannot know my wants, nor relieve my dis- 
 tress. I depend for domestic happiness as much on my state 
 government as a new-bom infant depends upon its mother for 
 nourishment. If this is not an answer, I have no other to 
 give." t 
 
 On the second of July live states voted with Ellsworth for 
 equal suffrage in the senate ; five of the six national states an- 
 swered, ISTo. All interest then centred upon Georgia, the sixth 
 national state and the last to vote. Baldwin, fearing a disrup- 
 tion of the convention, and convinced of the hopelessness of 
 assembling another under better auspices, dissented from his 
 colleague, and divided the vote of his state. So the motion 
 was lost by a tie ; J but as all believed that New Hampshire 
 and Rhode Island, had they been present, would have voted 
 with Connecticut, the convention moved rapidly toward its 
 inevitable decision. 
 
 For a moment Charles Pinckney made delay by calling up 
 his scheme for dividing the United States into northern, mid- 
 dle, and southern groups, and apportioning the senators be- 
 tween the three ; * a measure which, with modifications, he re- 
 peatedly brought forward. 
 
 Cotesworth Pinckney liked better the motion of Franklin, 
 and proposed that a committee of one from each state, taking 
 into consideration both branches of the legislature, should devise 
 and report a compromise. || " Such a committee," said Sher- 
 man, " is necessary to set us right." '^ 
 
 Gouvemeur Morris, who, after a month's absence, had just 
 returned, spoke abruptly for a senate for life to be appointed 
 
 * Gilpin, 1012-1014 ; Elliot, 2G8. « Gilpin, lOlY; Elliot, 270. 
 
 f Yates in Elliot, i., 473, 474. i Ibid. 
 
 i Gilpin, lOlG ; Elliot, 259, 270. ^ Yates in Elliot, i., 475. 
 
254 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; ch. hi. 
 
 by the executive ; * but the committee was ordered by a great 
 majority ; and the bouse showed its own inclination by select- 
 ing Franklin, Gerry, Ellsworth, Yates, Paters on, even Bedford 
 and Martin, Mason, Davie, Rutledge, and Baldwin. To give 
 them time for their task, and to all the opportunity of cele- 
 brating the anniversary of independence, the convention ad- 
 journed for three days, f 
 
 * Gilpin, 1019, 1020; Elliot, 271, 272. f Gilpin, 1023, 1024 ; Elliot, 273. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION. 255 
 
 CHAPTER ly. 
 
 THE ADJUSTMENT OF EEPEESENTATION. 
 
 Feom THE Third to the Twenty-Thied of July 1787. 
 
 On the morning of the third of Jnly the grand committee 
 accepted as a basis for a compromise * the proposal of Frank- 
 lin,f that in the first branch of the first congress there should 
 be one member for every forty thousand inhabitants, counting 
 all the free and three fifths of the rest ; that in the second 
 branch each state should have an equal vote ; and that, in re- 
 turn for this concession to the small states, the first branch 
 should be invested with the sole power of originating taxes and 
 appropriations. The settlement of the rule of representation 
 for new states was considered, but was left to the convention. 
 
 " The committee have exceeded their powers," ;{: cried Wil- 
 son, when Gerry, on the fifth, delivered the report to the con- 
 vention. Madison encouraged the large states to oppose it 
 steadfastly. Butler denounced the plan as unjust.* Gouver- 
 neur Morris, delighting to startle by his cynicism, condemned 
 alike its form and substance, || adding : " State attachments 
 and state importance have been the bane of the country. "We 
 cannot annihilate the serjDents, but we may perhaps take out 
 their teeth.^ Suppose the larger states agree, the smaller 
 states must come in. Jersey would follow the opinions of New 
 York and Pennsylvania. If persuasion does not unite the small 
 states with the others, the sword will. The strongest party 
 
 * Yates in Elliot, i., 4Y8. # Gilpin, 1028 ; Elliot, 216. 
 
 \ Martin in Elliot, i., 358. I| Gilpin, 1028 ; Elliot, 276, 
 
 X Gilpin, 1025 ; Elliot, 274. ^ Gilpin, 1030; Elliot, 277. 
 
256 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. iv. 
 
 will make the weaker traitors, and hang tliem. The larger 
 states are the most powerful ; they must decide." * Ellsworth 
 enforced the necessity of compromise, and saw none more con- 
 venient or reasonable than that proposed by the committee, f 
 
 " We are neither the same nation, nor different nations," 
 said Gerry ; " we therefore ought not to pursue the one or the 
 other of these ideas too closely. "Without a compromise a se- 
 cession will take place, and the result no man can foresee." 
 "There must be some accommodation on this point," said 
 Mason, " or we shall make little further progress in the work. 
 It cannot be more inconvenient to any gentleman to remain 
 absent from his private affairs than it is for me ; but I will bury 
 my bones in this city rather than expose my country to the 
 consequences of a dissolution of the convention without any- 
 thing being done." J 
 
 A throng of questions on representation thrust themselves 
 into the foreground. Gouverneur Morris objected to the rule 
 of numbers alone in the distribution of representatives. " ISTot 
 liberty," said he; "property is the main object of society. 
 The savage state is more favorable to hberty than the civilized, 
 and was only renounced for the sake of property. A range of 
 new states will soon be formed in the West. The rule of rep- 
 resentation ought to be so fixed as to secure to the Atlantic 
 states a prevalence in the national councils." Kutledge re- 
 peated : " Property is certainly the principal object of society. 
 If numbers should be the rule of representation, the Atlantic 
 states will soon be subjected to the western." " If new states," 
 said Mason and Randolph, " make a part of the union, they 
 ought to be subject to no unfavorable discriminations." * 
 
 On the morning of the sixth, Gouverneur Morris moved to 
 refer the ratio of representation in the popular branch to a 
 committee of five. || Wilson, who still strove to defeat the 
 compromise between the federal and the national states, sec- 
 onded the motion. In the distribution of representatives, 
 Gorham thought the number of inhabitants the true guide. 
 " Property," said King, " is the primary object of society, and, 
 
 * Paterson MSS. - Gilpin, 1034, 1035 ; Elliot, 278, 219. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1032; Elliot, 278. | Gilpin, 1036, 1039; Elliot, 280, 231. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1032, 1033 ; Elliot, 278. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTMENT OF EEPRESENTATION. 257 
 
 in fixing a ratio, ought not to be excluded from tlie estimate." * 
 " Property," said Butler, " is the only just measure of repre- 
 sentation."t To Charles Pinckney the number of inhabitants 
 appeared the true and only practicable rule, J and he acquiesced 
 in counting but three fifths of the slaves. The motion of Morris 
 was carried by 'New England, Pennsylvania, and the four south- 
 ernmost slaveholding states. Gouvemeur Morris, Gorham, 
 Randolph, Rutledge, and King, were chosen the committee. 
 
 On the seventh the clause allowing each state an equal 
 vote in the senate was retained as part of the report by six 
 states against three, New York being present and voting with 
 the majority, Massachusetts and Georgia being divided. 
 
 The number and distribution of the members of the first 
 branch of the legislature in the first congress, the rule for 
 every future congress, the balance of legislative power between 
 the South and the I^orth ; between the carrying states which 
 asked for a retaliatory navigation act and the planting states 
 which desired free freight and free trade ; between the origi- 
 nal states and new ones ; the apportionment of representation 
 according to numbers or wealth, or a combination of the two ; 
 the counting of all, or three fifths, or none, of the slaves ; the 
 equal suffrage in the senate — ^became the subjects of motions 
 and counter-motions, postponements and recalls. To unravel 
 the tangled skein it is necessary to trace each subject for itself 
 to its preliminary settlement. 
 
 On the ninth Gouverneur Morris presented the report of 
 the committee of five. It changed the distribution of repre- 
 sentation in the first congress to the advantage of the South ; 
 for the future, no one opposing except Randolph, it author- 
 ized, but purposely refrained from enjoining, the legislature, 
 from time to time, to regulate the number of representatives 
 of each state by its wealth and the number of its inhabitants. * 
 
 "The report," said Sherman, "corresponds neither with 
 any rule of numbers, nor any requisition by congress ; " || and 
 on his motion its first paragraph was referred to a committee 
 of one member from each state."^ Gouvemeur Morris sec- 
 
 •^ Gilpin, 1037; Elliot, 280. « Gilpin, 1051, 1052; Elliot, 287, 2S8. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1038; Elliot, 281. || Gilpin, 1052; Elliot, 288. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1039; Elliot, 281. ^Elliot,!., 197. 
 
 VOL. VI. — 17 
 
258 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; en. iv. 
 
 onded and Eandolpli approved tlie motion.* Paterson could 
 regard negro slaves in no light but as property ; to grant their 
 masters an increase of representation for them he condemned 
 as an indirect encouragement of the slave- trade, f Madison 
 revived his suggestion of a representation of free inhabitants 
 in the popular branch ; of the whole number, including slaves, 
 in the senate; which, as the special guardian of property, 
 would rightly be the protector of property in slaves. :j: " The 
 southern states are the richest," said King, who 3^et should 
 have known that they were not so, or perhaps was thinking 
 only of the exports of the country ^ " they will not league 
 themselves with the northern unless some respect is paid to 
 their superior wealth. The North must not expect to receive 
 from the connection preferential distinctions in commerce 
 without allowing some advantage in return." * 
 
 The committee of one from each state on the very next 
 morning, the tenth of July, produced their well-considered re- 
 port. The committee of five had fixed the number of repre- 
 sentatives at fifty-six ; or thirty from the l^orth, twenty-six 
 from the South ; and Maryland and Virginia had each given 
 up one member to South Carolina, raising her number to five. || 
 
 In the confederacy each state might send to congress as 
 many as seven delegates, so that the whole number in congress 
 might be ninety-one. This number was adopted for the new 
 constitution : as there were to be two branches of the legisla- 
 ture, two members for each state were assigned to the branch 
 representing the states, the remainiiig sixty-five were assigned 
 to the popular branch. Thirty-five were parcelled out to the 
 E'orth, to the South thirty. Of the new members for the 
 South, two were allotted to Maryland, one to Virginia, and 
 one to Georgia. In this way Connecticut, l^orth Carolina, 
 and South Carolina, having each -Q.vg votes in the popular 
 branch, retained in the house exactly one thirteenth of all the 
 votes in that body, and so would hold in each branch exactly 
 the same relative power as in the confederacy. The first cen- 
 sus established the justice of this relative distribution between 
 
 * Gilpin, 105 i; Elliot, 288, 289. + Gilpin, 1055 ; Elliot, 289, 290. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1055 ; Elliot, 289. # Gilpin, 105G ; Elliot, 290. 
 
 I Gilpin, 10G2, 1063; Elliot, 293; Elliot, i., 197, 198. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION. 259 
 
 the JSTorth and the South ; though, within the South, Georgia 
 and South Carohna had each at least one more than its share. 
 
 The final division was approved by all except South Caro- 
 lina and Georgia ; and these two favored states now opened a 
 resolute but not stormy debate to gain still more legislative 
 strength. To this end Eutledge moved to reduce the absent 
 state of I{ew Hampshire from three to two members, pleading 
 its deficiency in population and its poverty.* 
 
 King, after demonstrating the rights of JSTew HamjDshire, 
 proceeded : " The difference of interests lies not between the 
 great and small states, but between the southern and eastern. 
 For this reason I have been ready to yield something in the 
 proportion of representatives for the security of the southern. 
 I am not averse to yielding more, but do not see how it can be 
 done. They are brought as near an equality as is possible ; no 
 principle will justify giving them a majority." f Cotes worth 
 Pinckney replied : " If the southern states are to be in such a 
 minority, and the regulation of trade is to be given to the gen- 
 eral government, they will be nothing more than overseers for 
 the northern states. I do not expect the southern states to be 
 raised to a majority of the representatives ; but I A\dsh them 
 to have something like an equality." Randolph, speaking the 
 opinions of Kichard Henry Lee and of Mason as well as his 
 own, announced that he had it in contemplation to require 
 more than a bare majority of votes for laws regulating trade. 
 
 For reducing 'New Hampshire none voted but South Caro- 
 lina and Georgia. ^ There followed successive motions to give 
 one additional vote to each of the three southernmost states. 
 They were all lost ; Georgia alone obtaining the voice of Vir- 
 ginia. 
 
 On that day Eobert Yates and John Lansing of ISTew 
 York were on the floor for the last time. The governor of 
 their state had unreservedly declared that no good was to be 
 expected from the deliberations at Philadelphia ; that the con- 
 federation on more full experiment might be found to answer 
 all the purposes of the union.''* The state which had borne 
 itself with unselfish magnanimity through the war of the revo- 
 
 *Gi]pi:5, 1057; Elliot, 290. 'l Gilpin, 1059; Elliot, 291 ; Elliot, i., 193. 
 
 I Gilpin, 1057, 1058; Elliot, 290, 291. * Penn. Packet, 2GJuly 1787. 
 
260 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; oh. iv. 
 
 Intion had fallen under tlie sway of factious selfishness. Yield- 
 ing to this influence, Yates and Lansing, renouncing the path 
 to glory and the voice of duty, deserted their post, leaying to 
 the South the power to mould the commercial policy of the 
 union at its will. Hamilton, being left alone, had no vote, and 
 from this day to the end was absent more than half the time, 
 taking very little part in the formation of the constitution. 
 
 In the convention, from its organization to its dissolution, 
 there was always a majority of at least one on the side of the 
 southern states. After the defection of ISTew York the propor- 
 tion remained six to four till ]S'ew Hampshire arrived. 
 
 Slavery in the United States was a transient form, not an 
 original element of their colonization, nor its necessary out- 
 growth. In the division between northern and southern states 
 the criterion was, whether a state retained the power and the 
 will by its own inward energy to extricate itseK from slavery. 
 Seven had aboHshed, or were preparing to abolish it. Madison * 
 and others counted the southern states as no more than five ; 
 but Delaware, like all south of it, gave signs of being not equal 
 to the high endeavor of setting all its bondmen free ; and its 
 votes in the convention prove that it was rightly classed by 
 Dayton f with the South. The boundary between the two 
 sections was Mason and Dixon's hne. Pennsylvania, purely 
 popular, without family aristocracies or the ascendency of any 
 one form of religion, first in agriculture and commerce, and 
 not surpassed in ship-building, stood midway between six 
 northern states and six southern ones, the stronghold of an undi- 
 vided, inseparable federal republic. 
 
 The abolition of slavery in the ITorth, which was aided by 
 the long British occupation of Boston, Ehode Island, and IN'ew 
 York, had not been accomplished without a quickening of con- 
 science on the wrongfulness of hereditary bondage and its incon- 
 sistency with the first principles of American polity. By the 
 act of Pennsylvania of 1780 for the gradual abolition of 
 slavery, persons merely sojourning in the state were permitted 
 to retain their slaves for a term of six months ; delegates in 
 congress from other states, foreign ministers and consuls, as 
 long as they continued in their public characters. The right of 
 
 * Gilpin, 1104 ; Elliot, 315. t Gilpin, 1058 ; Elliot, 291. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTME:N^T OF KEPEESENTATIOK 261 
 
 the masters of absconding slaves to take them away remained as 
 before. But the recovery of a slave through the interposition 
 of the courts was resisted with zeal by self-appointed agents ; * 
 and the southern master sometimes had no relief but to seize the 
 runaway and bring him back to bondage by force. 
 
 Abolition and manumission societies were formed in various 
 parts of the Korth. Of one of these Hamilton was the secre- 
 tary, with Jay, Duane, and Robert R. Livingston for associates. 
 Just at this time Frankhn was elected president of the society 
 in Pennsylvania. The newspapers of all parties at the North 
 teemed with essays against slavery. The opposition to it pre- 
 vailed in nearly all religious and pohtical sects, but flamed the 
 brightest among those of extreme democratic tendencies. 
 
 In 1Y83 deputies from the yearly meeting of the Quakers 
 were admitted to the floor f of congress, and deKvered their 
 address, entreating that body to use its influence for the gen- 
 eral abolition of the slave-trade, and in several later years the 
 meeting renewed the petition. J The Presbyterian synod 
 which met at Philadelphia in the same week as the federal con- 
 vention resolved " to procure eventually the final abolition of 
 slavery in America." * , The Pennsylvam'a AboHtion Society 
 adopted a memorial to the convention to suppress the slave- 
 trade, II though, from motives of prudence, it was not pre- 
 sented. 
 
 This conspicuous action at the ISTorth on the slave-trade and 
 slavery might have baffled every hope of a consolidated union 
 but for the wide distinction between those states that were least 
 remote from the West Indies and those that lay nearer the 
 ISTorth ; between the states which planted indigo and rice and 
 those which cultivated by slave labor maize and wheat and 
 tobacco ; between Georgia and South Carohna which had ever 
 been well affected to the slave-trade, and the great slave-hold- 
 
 * Dallas, i., 179, 180 ; ii., 224. f Journals of Congress, iv., 289. 
 I Address presented 8 October 1'783, MS., at State Dept., Vol. of Kemon- 
 
 strances and Addresses, S39 ; Letter to R. H. Lee, President, 21 January 1785 ; 
 ibid., 347. See the MS. Records of the Friends, 20 October 1786, and October 
 1789. 
 
 * Acts and Proceedings of the Synod of Xew York and Philadelphia, a. d. 
 11S1. 
 
 I Pcnn. Packet of 14 February 1T38 ; T^dependcRt Gazetteer of 7 Mcrch 1788. 
 
262 THE FEDERAL OONVEXTIOiN'. b. hi. ; ch. iv. 
 
 ing state to the north of them which had wrestled with England 
 for its abolition. 
 
 In the three northernmost of the southern states slavery 
 maintained itself, not as an element of prosperity, but as a bale- 
 ful inheritance. The best of the statesmen of Virginia, without 
 regard to other questions which divided them, desired its aboli- 
 tion — alike Washington, Richard Henry Lee, Jefferson, Ran- 
 dolph, Madison, and Grayson. George Mason had written to 
 the legislature of Virginia against it with the most terrible in- 
 vectives and gloomiest forebodings. 
 
 This comparative serenity of judgment in Virginia was 
 shared, though not completely, by I^orth Carolina, of whose 
 population three parts out of four were free, and whose upland 
 country attracted emigrants by its fertility, salubrity, and beauty. 
 
 The difference betvfeen the two classes of slave states was 
 understood by themselves, and was a guarantee that questions 
 on slavery would neither inflame nor unite them. Virginia 
 and North Carolina held the balance of power, and knew how 
 to steer clear of a fatal collison. 
 
 The preliminary distribution of rej^resentatives having been 
 agreed upon, Gouverneur Morris on the ninth desired to leave 
 the control of future changes to the national legislature.* 
 Perceiving peril in confiding so vast a discretion to those who 
 might be tempted to keep to themselves an undue share of 
 legislative power, Randolph, following the precedent of 1781, on 
 the tenth insisted on an absolute constitutional requirement of 
 a census of population and an estimate of wealth, to be taken 
 within one year after the first meeting of the legislature, and 
 ever thereafter periodically ; and that the representation should 
 be arranged accordingly, f 
 
 Gouverneur Morris, supported by King and others, resisted 
 this " fettering of the legislature," by which a preponderance 
 might be thrown into the western scale. In various debates it 
 was urged by Morris and King and others that the western 
 people would in time outnumber those of the Atlantic states, 
 while they would be less wealthy, less cultivated, less favorable 
 to foreign commerce, and less willing to bide the right moment 
 for acquiring the free navigation of the lower Mississippi; 
 
 " Gilpin, 1052 ; Elliot, 288. i Gilpin, 1063 ; Elliot, 293. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTMENT OF EEPEESENTATIOiN". 2(53 
 
 that the busy haunts of men are the proper school for states- 
 men; that the members from the back country are always 
 most averse to the best measures ; that, if the western people 
 should get the power into their hands, they would ruin the 
 Atlantic interests ; and therefore that, in every future legisla- 
 ture, the original states should keep the majority in their own 
 hands. "^ 
 
 To this Mason rephed : " A revision from time to time, 
 according to some permanent and precise standard, is essential 
 to fair representation. According to the present population of 
 America, the northern part of it has a right to preponderate ; 
 and I cannot deny it. But, unless there shall be inserted in 
 the constitution some principle which will do justice to the 
 southern states hereafter, when they shall have three fourths 
 of the people of America within their limits, I can neither 
 vote for the system here nor support it in my state. The 
 western states as they arise must be treated as equals, or they 
 will speedily revolt. The number of inhabitants is a suffi- 
 ciently precise standard of wealth." f 
 
 " Congress," said Eandolph, " have pledged the public 
 faith to the new states that they shall be admitted on equal 
 terms. They never will, they never ought to accede on any 
 other." :{: Madison demonstrated that no distinctions unfavor- 
 able to the western states were admissible, either in point of 
 justice or policy.* 
 
 By a vote of seven to three the first legislature under the 
 new constitution was required to provide for a census ; | a 
 periodical census ever after was then accepted without a divi- 
 sion. Its period, first fixed at fifteen years, after repeated de- 
 bates, was reduced to ten.^ 
 
 Yet an ineradicable dread of the coming powxr of the 
 South-west lurked in ^ew England, especially in Massachu- 
 setts. On the fourteenth, only three days after the subject 
 appeared to have been definitively disposed of, Gerry and King 
 moved that the representatives of new states should never col- 
 
 * Gilpin, 1063, 1064, 1072 ; Elliot, 294, 298, # Gilpin, 1073 ; Elliot, 299. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1065, 1066 ; Elliot, 294, 295. I| Gilpin, 1078 ; Elliot, 301. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1067 ; Elliot, 295. ^ Gilpin, 1086 ; Elliot, 305. 
 
264 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; oh. iv. 
 
 lectivelj exceed in number the representatives from sncli of 
 the old thirteen states as should accede to the new confedera- 
 tion.* The motion came from New England ; and from New 
 England came the reply. " We are providing for our posteri- 
 ty," said Sherman, who had taken the principal part in secur- 
 ing to Connecticut a magnificent reserve of lands in northern 
 Ohio. " Our children and our grandchildren will be as likely 
 to be citizens of new western states as of the old states." f His 
 words were lost upon his own colleagues. The motion was 
 defeated by the narrowest majority, Massachusetts being sus- 
 tained by Connecticut, Delaware, and Maryland, against New 
 Jersey and the four southernmost states, Pennsylvania being 
 divided. X The vote of Maryland and Delaware was but the 
 dying expression of old regrets about the proprietaryship of 
 western lands, from which they had been excluded ; that of 
 Massachusetts sprung from a jealousy which grew stronger 
 with the ever-increasing political power of the South-west. 
 But in spite of renewed murmurs the decision was never re- 
 versed. 
 
 The final concession on the representation for slaves pro- 
 ceeded from North Carolina. On the eleventh of July, Wil- 
 liamson accepted for the permanent basis the free inhabit- 
 ants and three fifths of all others.* Randolph agreed to the 
 amendment. On the instant Butler and Cotesworth Pinckney 
 demanded that the blacks should be counted equally with the 
 whites. 1 
 
 New York, New Hampshire, and Ehode Island not being 
 on the floor, the southern states were left with ample power 
 to settle the question as they pleased. " The motion," said 
 Mason, " is favorable to Virginia, but I think it unjust. As 
 slaves are useful to the community at large, they ought not to 
 be excluded from the estimate for representation ; I cannot, 
 however, vote for them as equals to freemen." ^ On the ques- 
 tion, Delaware alone joined South Carolina and Georgia. 
 
 Butledge next insisted on proportioning representation pe- 
 riodically according to wealth as well as population. This was 
 
 * Gilpin, 1095; Elliot, SIO. 
 
 # Gilpin, 1066 ; Elliot, 295. 
 
 t Ibid. 
 
 II Gilpin, 106Y ; Elliot, 296. 
 
 t Ibid. 
 
 ^ Gilpin, 1068 ; Elliot, 296. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTMENT OF EEPRESENTATION. 265 
 
 condemned by Mason as indefinite and impracticable, leaving 
 to the legislatm-e a pretext for doing nothing.* Madison saw 
 no substantial objection to fixing numbers for the perpetual 
 standard of representation.f In like manner Sherman, John- 
 son, Wilson, and Gorham looked upon population as the best 
 measure of wealth ; and accepted the propriety of establishing 
 numbers as the rule. 
 
 King refused to be reconciled to any concession of repre- 
 sentation for slaves. J Gouverneur Morris, always a hater of 
 slavery, closed the debate by saying : " 1 am reduced to the di- 
 lemma of doing injustice to the southern states, or to human 
 nature, and I must do it to the former ; I can never agree to 
 give such encouragement to the slave-trade as would be given 
 by allowing them a representation for their negroes." * 
 
 On the division, those who insisted on enumerating all the 
 slaves and those who refused to enumerate any of them, as 
 elements of representation, partially coalesced ; and Connecti- 
 cut, Yirginia, and JSTorth Carolina, though aided by Georgia, 
 were outvoted by Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, 
 Delaware, Maryland, and South Carolina. || 
 
 The aspect of affairs at the adjournment was not so danger- 
 ous as it seemed. Yirginia vath a united delegation had her 
 hand on the helm, while North Carolina kept watch at her 
 side. 
 
 But Gouverneur Morris brooded over the deep gulf by 
 which the convention seemed to him rent in twain; and 
 rashly undertook to build a bridge over the chasm. To that 
 end he proposed the next morning that taxation should be in 
 proportion to representation.^ His motion was general, ex- 
 tending to every branch of revenue. 
 
 The convention was taken by surprise. South Carolina 
 scorned to be driven from her object by the menace of increased 
 contributions to the general treasury ; and again demanded a 
 full representation for all blacks. ^ Mason pointed out that 
 the proposal of Gouverneur Morris would so embarrass the legis- 
 
 '■ Gilpin, lOTl ; Elliot, 297. * Gilpin, lOVS ; Elliot, 301. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1074 ; Elliot, 299. |1 Ibid. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1076 ; Elliot, 300. ^ Gilpin, 1079 ; Elliot, 302. 
 
 Gilpin, 1079, 1030 ; Elliot, 302. 
 
266 THE FEDERAL CONYEN'TIOK b. iii. ; ch. it. 
 
 lature in raising a revenue tliat tliey would be driven back to 
 requisitions on the states. Appalled at discovering that his 
 motion was a death-blow to the new constitution, Morris lim- 
 ited it to direct taxation, saying : " It would be inapphcable to 
 indirect taxes on exports and imports and consumjption." * 
 Cotesworth Pinckney took fire at the idea of taxing exports. 
 "Wilson came to the partial rescue of Morris ; and the conven- 
 tion, without a dissentient, agreed that " direct taxation ought 
 to be in proportion to representation." f In this short interlude, 
 by the temerity of one man, the United States were precluded 
 from deriving an equitable revenue from real property. Mor- 
 ris soon saw what evil he had wrought, but he vainly strove to 
 retrieve it. 
 
 The moderating states of the South grew restless. " North 
 Carolina," said Davie, " will never confederate on terms that 
 do not rate their blacks at least as three fifths." J Johnson, 
 holding the negro slave to be a man, and nothing less than a 
 man, could not forego the conclusion " that blacks equally with 
 the whites ought to faU within the computation," and his votes 
 conformed to his scruples. Contrary to the wishes of Grouver- 
 neur Morris and King, Kandolph insisted that the representa- 
 tion allowed for slaves should be imbodied in the constitution, 
 saying : " I lament that such a species of property exists ; but, 
 as it does exist, the holders of it will require this security." * 
 Ellsworth seconded Ilandolj)h, whose motion was tempered in 
 its form by Wilson, so as to avoid the direct mention of slaveiy 
 or slave. " The southern states," said King, " threaten to sepa- 
 rate now in case injury shall be done them. There will be no 
 point of time at which they will not be able to say, ' Do us 
 justice or we wiU separate.' " The final motion to make blacks 
 equal with whites in fixing the ratio of representation received 
 no support but from South Carolina and Georgia ; || and the com- 
 promise, proportioning representation to direct taxation, and 
 both to the number of the free and three fifths of others, was 
 established by the southern states, even Georgia approving, and 
 South Carolina relenting so far as to divide its vote."^ 
 
 * Gilpin, 1080; Elliot, 302. ^ Gilpin, 1083; Elliot, 304. 
 
 t Gilpin, 1081 ; Elliot, 302. I Gilpin, 1084-1087 ; Elliot, 304-306. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1081 ; Elliot, 302, 303. ^ Gilpin, 108G, 1087; Elliot, 306. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTMENT OF EEPRESENTATION. 2G7 
 
 Eandolph, on tlie tliirteenth, seized the opportunity to pro- 
 pose numbers as tlie sole rule of representation. Gouverneur 
 Morris " stated the result of his deep meditation " : " The south- 
 ern gentlemen will not be satisfied unless they see the way open 
 to their gaining a majority in the public councils. The conse- 
 quence of such a transfer of power from the maritime to the 
 interior and landed interest will, I foresee, be an oppression to 
 commerce. In this struggle between the two ends of the 
 union, the middle states ought to join their eastern brethren. 
 If the southern states get the power into their hands and be 
 joined as they will be with the interior country, everything is 
 to be apprehended." 
 
 By the interior, Morris had specially in his mind the rising- 
 states of Kentucky and Tennessee. Butler replied : " The 
 southern states want security that their negroes may not be 
 taken from them, which some gentlemen within or without 
 doors have a very good mind to do. North Carolina, South 
 Carolina, and Georgia will have relatively many more people 
 than they now have. The people and strength of America are 
 evidently bearing to the South and South-west." * 
 
 " The majority," said Wilson, " wherever found, ought to 
 govern. The interior country, should it acquire this majority, 
 will avail itseK of its right whether we will or no. If num- 
 bers be not a proper rule, why is not some better rule pointed 
 out ? Congress have never been able to discover a better. No 
 state has suggested any other. Property is not the sole nor the- 
 primary end of government and society ; the improvement of 
 the human mind is the most noble object. With respect to 
 this and other personal rights, numbers are surely the natural 
 and precise measure of representation, and could not vary much 
 from the precise measure of property." f 
 
 The apportionment of representation according to numbers 
 was adopted without a negative, Delaware alone being divided.:]: 
 The American declaration of independence proclaimed all men 
 free and equal ; the federal convention founded representation 
 on numbers alone. 
 
 The equality of votes of the states in the senate being re- 
 
 * Gilpin, 1091-1093 ; Elliot, 308, 809. 
 f Gilpin, 1093, 1094; Elliot, 309. X Gilpin, 1091; Elliot, 309. 
 
268 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION". b. iii. ; en. iv. 
 
 ported to the conyention on the fourteenth, was resisted bj 
 Wilson, King, and Madison to the last as contrary to justice. 
 On the other hand, Sherman held that the state governments 
 could not be preserved unless they should have a negative in 
 the general government. 
 
 Caleb Strong, a statesman of consummate prudence, from 
 the valley of the Connecticut, a graduate of Harvard, and a fit 
 representative of the country people of Massachusetts, lucidly 
 reviewed the case, and, from the desire to prevent the dissolu- 
 tion of the union, found himself compelled to vote for the com- 
 promise. Madison replied in an elaborate speech, which closed 
 'with these words : " Th^ perpetuity which an equahty of votes 
 I in the second branch will give to the preponderance of the 
 northern against the southern scale is a serious consideration. 
 It seems now well understood that the real difference of inter- 
 ests lies, not between the large and small, but between the 
 northern and southern states. The institution of slavery and 
 its consequences form the line of discrimination. Should a 
 proportional representation take place, the northern will still 
 outnumber the other ; but every day will tend toward an equi- 
 librium." * 
 
 The great poet of the Hellenic race relates how the most 
 famed of its warriors was lured by one of the heavenly powers 
 from the battle-field to chase a phantom. Had the South 
 joined with the smaller states to establish the suffrage by states 
 in both branches of the general legislature, it would, in less 
 than ten years, f have arrived at an equality, alike in the house 
 and in the senate. But it believed that swarms of emigrants 
 were about to throng every path to the South-west, bearing 
 with them affluence and power. It did not yet know the 
 dynamic energy of freedom in producing wealth, and attract- 
 ing and employing and retaining population. The equality of 
 the vote in the senate, which Virginia and South Carolina 
 vehemently resisted, was to gain and preserve for the slave- 
 holding states a balance in one branch of the legislature ; in 
 the other, where representation was apportioned to population, 
 the superiority of the free commonwealths would increase from 
 decade to decade till slavery in the United States should be no 
 
 * Gilpin, 1104; Elliot, 315. f In 1796, on the admission of Tennessee. 
 
1787. THE ADJUSTMENT OF KEPRESENTATION. 269 
 
 more. Shrinking from the final vote on the question, the 
 house adjourned. 
 
 On Monday, the sixteenth, as soon as the convention assem- 
 bled, the question was taken on the amended report which 
 included an equality of votes in the senate.* The six south- 
 ern states were present, and only four of the northern. Four 
 of the six states which demanded a proportioned representa- 
 tion stubbornly refused to yield. It was of decisive influence 
 on the history of the country that Strong and Gerry, balanc- 
 ing the inflexible King and Gorham, pledged Massachusetts 
 at least to neutrality. On the other side, Connecticut, "New 
 Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland spurned the thought of sur- 
 render. The decision was given by iN'orth Carolina, which 
 broke from her great associates and gave a majority of one to 
 the smaller states. More than ten years before, Jefferson had 
 most earnestly proposed this compromise, seeking to proselyte 
 John Adams, to whom he wrote : " The good whigs will so 
 far cede their opinions for the sake of union." f He heard 
 with great joy that his prophecy had come to pass. ^ 
 
 The large states accepted the decision as final. When, on 
 the seventeenth, Gouverneur Morris proposed a reconsidera- 
 tion of the resolution of the former day, no one would second 
 his motion.'' 
 
 On the twenty-third the number of senators for each state 
 was fixed at two, and each of these, as had been proposed by 
 Gerry and supported by Sherman, was personally to have one 
 vote.* 
 
 From the day when every doubt of the right of the smaller 
 states to an equal vote in the senate was quieted, they — so I 
 received it from the Hps of Madison, and so it appears from the 
 records — exceeded all others in zeal for granting powers to the 
 general government. Ellsworth became one of its strongest 
 pillars. Paterson of New Jersey was for the rest of his life 
 a federalist of federalists. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1107-1109 ; Elliot, 316, 317. 
 
 f Works of John Adams, ix., 465-467. t Jefferson, ii., 329. 
 
 # Gilpin, 1098, 1185, 1186 ; Elliot, 311, 312, 356, 357. 
 
270 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. B.iii.;cn. y. 
 
 CHAPTEH Y. 
 
 THE OUTLINE OF THE CONSTITUTION COMPLETED AND REFERRED. 
 
 From the 17th to the 2Tth of July 17ST. 
 
 ( The distribution of powers between the general govern- 
 ^ ^ ment and the states was tlie most delicate and most difficult task 
 1 before the convention. Startled by the vagueness of language 
 in the Virginia resolve, Sherman on the seventeenth of July 
 proposed the grant of powers " to make laws in all cases which 
 may concern the common interests of the union, but not to in- 
 terfere with the government of the individual states in any 
 matters of internal police which respect the government of 
 such states only, and wherein the general welfare of the United 
 States is not concerned." * Wilson seconded the amendment, 
 as better exj^ressing the general principle. But, on scanning 
 /its probable interpretation by the separate states, the objection 
 y \ prevailed that it would be construed to withhold from the gen- 
 sj ^eral government the authority to levy direct taxes and the 
 I authority to suppress the paper money of the states. 
 / Bedford moved to empower the national legislature " to 
 \ legislate for the general interests of the union, for cases to 
 / < which the states are severally incompetent, or in which the 
 V i harmony of the United States might be interrupted by the 
 exercise of individual legislation." f This Gouverneur Morris 
 gladly seconded ; and, though Kandolph resisted, the curreut 
 ^ ran with such increasing vehemence for union that the amend- 
 ment was adopted at first by six states, and then by every state 
 but South Carolina and Georgia. 
 
 As to giving power to tlie national legislature " to negative 
 
 * Gilpin, 1115 ; Elliot, 319, 320. f Gilpin, 1116 ; Elliot, 320. 
 
1787. OUTLINE OF THE CONSTITUTIOISr EEFERRED. 271 
 
 laws passed by the several states," Gouvemeiir Morris, opposing'^ 
 it as terrible to the states,'^ looked where Jefferson invited 
 Madison to look^to the judiciary department to set aside a 
 law that ought to be negatived.f Sherman insisted that state 
 laws, contravening the authority of the nnion, :j: were invalid 
 and inoperative from the beginning. Madison put forth all 
 his strength to show that a power of negativing the improper 
 laws of the states is the most mild and certain means of pre- 
 serving the harmony of the system. He was supported by 
 Massachusetts, Virginia, and North Carolina.* 
 
 From the New Jersey plan it was taken, without one dis- 
 sentient, that the laws and treaties of the United States should 
 be the supreme law of the states, and bind their judiciaries, 
 anything in their laws to the contrary notwithstanding. || That 
 all power not granted to the general government remained 
 with the states was the opinion of every member of the con- 
 vention ; but they held it a work of supererogation to place in 
 the constitution an express recognition of the reservation. 
 Thus in one half of a morning the convention began and ended 
 its distribution of power between the states and the union. 
 The further development of the central government brought 
 to it a wider scope of action and new ascendency over the 
 states. 
 
 The construction of the executive department was fraught 
 with bewildering difficulties, of which a new set rose up as 
 fast as the old ones were overcome. The convention, though 
 it devoted many days in July to the subject, did but acquiesce 
 for the moment in the Virginia resolve, with which its delib- 
 erations had yet made it thoroughly discontented. 
 
 Mason and the Pinckneys would have required a qualifi- 
 cation of landed property for the executive, judiciary, and 
 members of the national legislature."^ Gerry approved secur- 
 ing property by property provisions. "If qualifications are 
 proper," said Gouverneur Morris, " I should prefer them in 
 the electors rather than the elected ; " ^ and Madison agreed 
 
 * Gilpin, lllY ; Elliot, 321. |I Gilpin, 1119 : Elliot, 822. 
 
 t Gilpin, Ills ; Elliot, 321. ^ Gilpin, 1211, 1213 ; Elliot, 370, 371. 
 
 ± Gil-ia, lllY, 1118 ; Elliot, 321, 322. () Gilpin, 1211 ; Elliot, 3'70. 
 
 ^^ GiJnJn, 1118, 1119 ; Elliot, 322. 
 
272 THE FEDERAL COKYENTION. b.iii.;oh.v. 
 
 with Mm. " I," said Dickinson, " doubt tlie policy of inter- 
 weaving into a republican constitution a veneration for wealth. 
 A veneration for poverty and virtue is the object of republican 
 encoui-agement. 'No man of merit should be subjected to dis- 
 abilities in a republic where merit is understood to form the 
 great title to public trust, honors, and rewards." * The sub- 
 ject came repeatedly before the convention; but it never 
 consented to require a property qualification for any office in 
 the general government. In this way no obstruction to uni- 
 versal suffrage was allowed to conquer a foothold in the con- 
 stitution, but its builders left the enlargement of suffrage to 
 time and future lawgivers. They disturbed no more than was 
 needed for the success of their work. They were not rest- 
 less in zeal for one abstract rule of theoretical equality to be 
 introduced instantly and everywhere. They were like the 
 mariner in mid-ocean, on the rolhng and tossing deck of a 
 ship, who learns how to keep his true course by watching 
 the horizon as well as the sun. In leading a people across 
 the river that divided their old condition from the new, 
 the makers of the new form of government anchored the 
 supporting boats of their bridge up stream. The qualifica- 
 tions of the electors it left to be decided by the states, each 
 for itself. 
 
 All agreed "that a supreme tribunal should be estab- 
 lished," f and that the national legislature should be empow- 
 ered to create inferior tribunals, j;. By the report of the com- 
 mittee, on the eighteenth, the judges were to be appointed by 
 the senate. Gorham, supported by Gouverneur Morris, pro- 
 posed their appointment " by the executive with the consent 
 of the second branch " ; a mode, he said, which had been 
 ratified by the experience of a hundred and forty years in 
 Massachusetts.* The proposal was gradually gaining favor; 
 but for the moment failed by an equal division. 
 
 The trial of impeachments of national officers was taken 
 from the supreme court ; and then, in the words of Madison, 
 its jurisdiction was unanimously made to " extend to all cases 
 arising under the national laws, or involving the national peace 
 
 * Gilpin, 1213-1215; Elliot, 371, 3V2. ^ Gilpin, 113Y; Elliot, 331. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1130; Elliot, 328. # Gilpin, 1134; Elliot, 330. 
 
1787. OUTLINE OF THE CONSTITUTION KEFERRED. 273 
 
 and harmony." * Controversies wliicli began and ended in the 
 several states were not to be removed from the courts of the 
 states. 
 
 The convention had still to decide how the new consti- 
 tution should be ratified. " By the legislatures of the states," 
 proposed Ellsworth, on the twenty-third, and he was seconded 
 by Paterson. " The legislatures of the states have no power to 
 ratify it," said Mason. " And, if they had, it would be wrong 
 to refer the plan to them, because succeeding legislatures, hav- 
 ing equal authority, could undo the acts of their predecessors, 
 and the national government would stand in each state on the 
 tottering foundation of an act of assembly. Whither, then, 
 must we resort? To the people, with whom all power re- 
 mains that has not been given up in the constitutions derived 
 from them." 
 
 " One idea," said Randolph, " has pervaded all our pro- 
 ceedings, that opposition, as well from the states as from in- 
 dividuals, will be made to the system to be proposed. Will 
 it not, then, be highly imprudent to furnish any unnecessary 
 pretext by the mode of ratifying it ? The consideration of this 
 subject should be transferred from the legislatures, where local 
 demagogues have their full influence, to a field in which their 
 efforts can be less mischievous. Moreover, some of the states 
 are averse to any change in their constitution, and will not 
 take the requisite steps unless expressly called upon to refer 
 the question to the people." f 
 
 "The confederation," said Gerry, "is paramount to the 
 state constitutions ; and its last article authorizes alterations 
 only by the unanimous concurrence of the states." " Are all 
 the states," replied his colleague Gorham, "to suffer them- 
 selves to be ruined, if Rhode Island, if 'New York, should 
 persist in opposition to general measures? Provision ought 
 to be made for giving effect to the system, without waiting 
 for the unanimous concurrence of the states." :{: 
 
 " A new set of ideas," said Ellsworth, " seems to have crept 
 in since the articles of confederation were established. Con- 
 ventions of the people, with power derived expressly from 
 
 » Gilpin, 113<S; Elliot, 332, and L, 210. X Gilpin, 1180; Elliot, 354. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1177-1179; Elliot, 352, 353. 
 VOL. VI. — 18 
 
274 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b.iii.;ch.v. 
 
 ' tlie people, were not then thought of." * ^' A reference to 
 the authority of the people expressly delegated to conven- 
 tions," insisted King, " is most likely to draw forth the best 
 men in the states to decide on the new constitution, and to 
 obviate disputes and doubts concerning its legitimacy." f 
 
 Madison spoke with intense earnestness. " The difference 
 between a system founded on the legislatures only and one 
 founded on the people is the difference between a treaty and 
 a constitution. A law violating a treaty ratified by a pre- 
 existing law might be respected by the judges ; a law vio- 
 lating a constitution established by the people themselves would 
 be considered by the judges as null and void. A breach of any 
 one article of a treaty by any one of the parties frees the other 
 parties from their engagements ; a union of the people, under 
 one constitution, by its nature excludes such an interpreta- 
 tion." x 
 
 After a full debate, the convention, by nine states against 
 Delaware, referred the ratification of the new constitution to 
 ) an assembly in each state to be chosen specially for that pur- 
 (. pose by the people.* 
 
 In the following three days the resolutions of the federal 
 convention for the establishment of a national government, 
 consisting of twenty-three in number, were finished and re- 
 ferred to a committee of detail, five in number, who were or- 
 dered to prepare and report them in the form of a constitution. 
 "With them were referred the propositions of Charles Pinckney 
 and the plan of New Jersey. v. 
 
 The federal convention selected for its committee of detail 
 three members from the North and two from the South — Gor- 
 ham, Ellsworth, Wilson, Randolph, and John Rutledge, of 
 whom the last was the chairman. By ancestry Scotch-Irish, 
 in early youth carefully but privately educated, afterward a 
 student of law in the Temple at London, Rutledge became the 
 foremost statesman of his time south of Yirginia. At the age 
 of twenty-six he began his national career in the stamp-act con- 
 gress of 1765, and from that time was employed by his state 
 wherever the aspect of affairs was the gravest. Patrick Henry 
 
 * Gilpin, 1181 ; Elliot, 354. ^ Gilpin, 1183, 1184 ; Elliot, 355, 356. 
 
 t Gilpin, 1183 ; Elliot, 355. ^ Gilpin, 1185 ; Elliot, 356. 
 
1787. OUTLINE OF THE CONSTITUTION REFERRED. 275 
 
 pronounced him tlie most eloquent man in tlie congress of 
 1774: ; liis sincerity gave force to his words. In the darkest 
 hours he was intrepid, hopeful, inventive of resources, and reso- 
 lute, so that timidity and wavering disappeared before him. To 
 the day when disease impaired his powers he was, in war and 
 in peace, the pride of Soutli Carolina. That state could not 
 have selected an abler representative of its policy on the pay- 
 ment of the members of the national legislature from the 
 treasuries of the states, on the slave-trade, the taxation of ex- 
 ports, and the requisition of more than a bare majority of the 
 legislature to counteract European restrictions on navigation. 
 
 Of his associates, Gorham was a merchant of Boston, who 
 from his own experience understood the commercial relations 
 of his country, and knew where the restrictive laws of Eng- 
 land, of France, and of Spain injured American trade and ship- 
 ping. Ellsworth, who had just established harmony between 
 the small and the larger states by a wdse and happy compromise, 
 now found himself the umpire between the extreme South and 
 the ^N'orth. 
 
 Cotesworth Pinckney called to mind that if the committee 
 should fail to insert some security to the southern states against 
 an emancipation of slaves, and against taxes on exports, he 
 should be bound by duty to his state to vote against their re- 
 port.* After this the convention, on the twenty-sixth of July, 
 unanimously adjourned till Monday, the sixth of August, that 
 the committee of detail might have time to prepare and report 
 the constitution. f 
 
 The committee in joint consultation gave their unremitting 
 attention to every question that came before them. J Their 
 best guides were the constitutions of the several states, which 
 furnished most striking expressions, and regulations approved 
 by long experience. There is neither record nor personal nar- 
 rative of their proceedings, though they were invested with the ( 
 largest constructive powers; but the conduct of its several 
 members may be determined by light reflected from their own ; 
 words and actions before and after. Meanwhile the interest and • 
 
 * Gilpin, 1187 ; Elliot, 357. f Gilpin, 1220; Elliot, 374, 375. 
 
 X Wilson in Gilpin, 1249 ; Elliot, 385, and Rutledge in Gilpin, 1284 ; Elliot, 
 403. 
 
276 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b.iii.;ch.v. 
 
 anxiety of tlie country were on the increase. In May Grayson 
 had written to Monroe : " The weight of General Washington 
 is very great in America, but I hardly think it is sufficient to 
 induce the people to pay money or part with power." * " If 
 what the convention recommend should be rejected," so wrote 
 Monroe to Jefferson the day after the adjournment, " they will 
 complete our ruin. But I trust that the presence of General 
 "Washington will overawe and keep under the demon of party, 
 and that the signature of his name to the result of their de- 
 liberations will secure its passage through the union." 
 
 * Grayson to Monroe, 29 May 1*787. 
 
1786. THE COLONTAL SYSTEM OF AMEPwIOA. 277 
 
 CHAPTER YL 
 
 the colonial system op the united states. 
 Feom Januaey 1786 to July 1787. 
 
 Before the federal convention had referred its resolutions 
 to a committee of detail, an interlude in congress was shaping 
 the character and destiny of the United States of America. 
 Sublime and humane and eventful in the history of mankind 
 as was the result, it will take not many words to tell how it 
 was brought about. For a time wisdom and peace and justice 
 dwelt among men, and the great ordinance, which could alone 
 give continuance to the union, came in serenity and stillness. 
 Every man that had a share in it seemed to be led by an invisi- 
 ble hand to do just what was wanted of him ; all that was wrong- 
 fully undertaken fell to the ground to wither by the wayside ; 
 whatever was needed for the happy completion of the mighty 
 work arrived opportunely, and just at the right moment moved 
 into its place. 
 
 By the order of congress a treaty was to be held, in Janu- 
 ary 1786, with the Shawnees, at the mouth of the Great 
 Miami. Monroe, who had been present as a spectator at the 
 meeting of the United States commissioners with the represen- 
 tatives of the Six Nations at Fort Stanwix, in 1784, desired to 
 attend this meeting with a remoter tribe. He reached Fort 
 Pitt, and with some of the American party began the descent 
 of the Ohio ; but, from the low state of the water, he aban- 
 doned the expedition at Limestone, and made his way to 
 Richmond through Kentucky and the wilderness. As the 
 result of his inquiries on the journey, he took with him to 
 congress the opinion that a great part of the western territory, 
 
278 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. vi. 
 
 especially that near Lakes Michigan and Erie, was miserably 
 poor ; that the land on the Mississippi and the Illinois consisted 
 of extensive plains which had not a single bnsh on them, and 
 would not have for ages ; that the western settlers, in many 
 of the most important objects of a federal government, would 
 be either opposed to the interests of the old states or but lit- 
 tle connected with them. He would form the territory into 
 no more than five states ; but he adhered to the principle of 
 Jefferson, that they ought as soon as possible to take part in 
 governing themselves, and at an early day share " the sover- 
 eignty, freedom, and independence " of the other states. 
 
 In the course of the winter the subject of the division of 
 the western territory into states was, on the motion of Monroe, 
 referred to a grand committee. Its report, which was pre- 
 sented on the twenty-fourth of March, traced the division of 
 the territory into ten states to the resolution of congress of 
 September 1780, by which no one was to contain less territory 
 than one hundred nor more than one hundred and fifty miles 
 square. This resolution had controlled the ordinance of April 
 1784 ; and, as the first step toward a reform, every part of that 
 ordinance which conflicted with the power of congress to di- 
 vide the territory into states according to its own discretion 
 was to be repealed.* 
 
 Yirginia had imbodied the resolve of congress of Septem- 
 ber 1780 in its cession of its claims to the land north-west of 
 the " Ohio. A further report proposed that Virginia should be 
 asked to revise its act of cession. f 
 
 At this stage of the proceedings Dane made a successful 
 motion to raise a committee for considering and reporting the 
 form of a temporary government for the western states. :[: Its 
 chairman was Monroe, with Johnson and King of JN^ew Eng- 
 
 * This first report of the grand committee is found in Reports of Committees, 
 Papers of Old Congress, xxx., 75, in the State Department, and is indorsed as hav- 
 ing been "read 24th of March 1780, to be considered Thursday, March 30th." 
 
 f This second report of the grand committee is found likewise in vol. xxx., 79, 
 and following, of Papers of Old Congress ; but it has no indorsement as to the 
 time when it was entered, read, or considered. 
 
 X The day on which this motion was made is not given, nor is the motion en- 
 tered in the Journal. It was probcibly in April. We get the fact from page 85 
 of vol. xxx. of the Papers of the Old Congress. 
 
1786. THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF AMEPwIOA. 279 
 
 land, John Kean and Charles Pinckney of South Carolina, as 
 his associates. On the tenth of May this committee read their 
 report. It asked the consent of Virginia to a division of the 
 territory into not less than two nor more than five states ; pre- 
 sented a plan for their temporary colonial government; and 
 promised them admission into the confederacy on the princi- 
 ple of the ordinance of Jefferson. ]^ot one word was said of 
 a restriction on slavery. "^J^o man liked better than Monroe to 
 lean for support on the minds and thoughts of others. He y/ 
 loved to spread his sails to a favoring breeze, but in threaten- 
 ing w^eather preferred quiet under the shelter of his friends. 
 When Jefferson, in 1784, moved a restriction on slavery in the 
 western country from Florida to the Lake of the AVoods, Mon- 
 roe was ill enough to be out of the way at the division. When 
 King in the following year revived the question, he was again 
 absent at the vote ; now, when the same subject challenged his 
 attention, he was silent.' 
 
 "" At first Monroe flattered himself that his report was gener- 
 ally approved ; * but no step was taken toward its adoption^ 
 All that was done lastingly for the West by this congress was 
 the fruit of independent movements. On the twelfth of May, 
 at the motion of Grayson seconded by King, the navigable 
 waters leading into the Mississippi and the St. Lawrence, and 
 the carrying places between them, were declared to be common 
 highways, forever free to all citizens of the United States, 
 without any tax, impost, or duty. 
 
 . The assembly of Connecticut, which in the same month 
 held a session, was resolved on opening a land ofiice for the 
 sale of six millions of acres west of the Pennsylvania line 
 which their state had reserved in its cession of all further 
 claims by charter to western lands. The reservation was not 
 excessive in extent ; the right of Connecticut under its charter 
 had been taken away by an act of the British parliament of 
 which America had alw^ays denied the validity. The federal 
 constitution had provided no mode of settling a strife between 
 a state and the United States ; a war would cost more than the 
 land was worth. f Grayson ceased his opposition ; and on the 
 
 * Monroe to' Jefferson, New York, 11 May 1786. 
 f Grayson to Madison, "28 May 1786. 
 
280 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. vi. 
 
 fourteenth of the following September congress accepted the 
 deed of cession by which Connecticut was confirmed in the 
 possession of what was called her " western reserve." The 
 compact establishment of the culture of l^ew England in that 
 district had the most beneficent effect on the character of Ohio 
 and the development of the union. 
 
 For diminishing the number of the states to be formed out 
 of the western territory, Monroe might hope for a favorable 
 hearing. At his instance the subject was referred to a grand 
 committee, which on the seventh of July reported in favor of 
 obtaining the assent of Virginia to the division of the territory 
 north-west of the Ohio into not less than two nor more than 
 five states. 
 
 With singular liberality Grayson proposed to divide the 
 country at once into not less than five states. He would run 
 a line east and west so as to touch the most southern part of 
 Lake Michigan, and from that line draw one meridian line to 
 the western side of the mouth of the Wabash, and another to 
 the western side of the mouth of the Great Miami, making 
 three states between the Mississippi and the western lines of 
 Yirginia and Pennsylvania. The peninsula of Michigan was 
 to form a fourth state ; the fifth would absorb the country be- 
 tween Lake Michigan, Lake Superior, and the line of water to 
 the northern boundary in the Lake of the Woods on the one 
 side and the Mississippi on the other. This division, so unfa- 
 vorable to southern influence, was voted for by Maryland, Vir- 
 ginia, ISTorth Carolina, and Georgia, South CaroHna being di- 
 vided ; the North did not give one state in its favor ; and the 
 motion was lost. It was then agreed that the district should 
 ultimately be divided at least into three states, the states and 
 individuals being unanimous, except that Grayson adhered to 
 his preference of five."^ 
 
 The cause which arrested the progress of the ordinance of 
 Monroe was a jealousy of the political power of the western 
 states, and a prevailing desire to impede their admission into 
 the union. To Jefferson he explained with accurate foresight 
 the policy toward which congress was drifting. 
 
 When the inhabitants of the Kaskaskias presented a peti- 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv., 662, 663. 
 
1786-1787. THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF AMERICA. 281 
 
 tion for the organization of a government over their district, 
 Monroe took part in the answer, that congress had nnder con- 
 sideration the plan of a temporary government for their dis- 
 trict in which it would manifest a due regard to their interest.* 
 This is the last act of congress relating to the West in which 
 Monroe participated. With the first Monday of the coming 
 J^ovember the rule of rotation would exclude him from con- 
 gress. 
 
 During the summer Kean was absent from congress, and 
 his place on the committee was taken by Melancthon Smith f 
 of New York. In September, Monroe and King went on a 
 mission from Congress to the legislature of Pennsylvania, and 
 their places were filled by Henry of Maryland and Dane. The 
 committee with its new members represented the ruling senti- 
 ment of the house ; and its report, which was made on the 
 nineteenth of September, required of a western state before 
 its admission into the union a population equal to one thir- 
 teenth part of the citizens of the thirteen original states ac- 
 cording to the last preceding enumeration. Had this report 
 been adopted, and had the decennial census of the population 
 of territories and states alone furnished the rule, Ohio must 
 have waited twenty years longer for admission into the union ; 
 Indiana would have been received only after 1850 ; IIHnois 
 only after 18G0 ; Michigan could not have asked admittance 
 till after the census of 1880 ; and after that census Wisconsin 
 must still have remained a colonial dependency. 
 
 The last day of September 1786 was given to the considera- 
 tion of the report ; but before anything was decided the sev- 
 enth congress expired. 
 
 The new congress, to which Madison and Eichard Henry 
 Lee, as well as Grayson and Edward Carrington, were sent by 
 Yirginia, had no quorum till February 1787, and then was oc- 
 cupied with preparations for the federal convention and with 
 the late insurrection in Massachusetts. But the necessity of 
 providing for a territorial government was urgent ; and near 
 the end of April the committee of the late congress revived 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv,, 688, 689. 
 
 f The name of Smith as one of the committee occurs in August 1*786. Journals 
 of Congress, iv., 688. 
 
282 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; oh. vi. 
 
 its project of the preceding September. On the ninth of May 
 it was read a second time ; the clause which would have indefi- 
 nitely delayed the admission of a w^estern state was cancelled ; * 
 a new draft of the bill as amended was directed to be tran- 
 scribed, and its third reading was made the order of the next 
 day, t when of a sudden the further progress of the ordinance 
 was arrested. 
 
 Kufus Putnam, of Worcester county, Massachusetts, who 
 had drawn to himself the friendly esteem of the commander- 
 in-chief, and before the breaking up of the army received the 
 commission of brigadier-general, was foremost in promoting a 
 petition to congress of ofiicers and soldiers of the revolution 
 for leave to plant a colony of the veterans of the army between 
 Lake Erie and the Ohio, in townships of six miles square, with 
 large reservations " for the ministry and schools." For him- 
 self and his associates he entreated Washington to represent 
 to congress the strength of the grounds on which their petition 
 rested. :j: Their unpaid services in the war had saved the in- 
 dependence and the unity of the land ; their settlement would 
 protect the frontiers of the old states against alarms of the sav- 
 ages ; their power would give safety along the boundary line on 
 the north ; under their shelter the endless procession of emi- 
 grants would take up its march to fill the country from Lake 
 Erie to the Ohio. 
 
 With congress while it was at Princeton, and again after 
 its adjournment to Annapolis, Washington exerted every power 
 of which he was master to bring about a speedy decision. The 
 members with whom he conversed acquiesced in the reasonable- 
 ness of the petition and approved its policy, but they excused 
 their inertness by the want of a cession of the north-western 
 lands. 
 
 When, in March 1784, the lands were ceded by Virginia, 
 Pufus Putnam again appeals to Washington : " You are sensi- 
 ble of the necessity as well as the possibility of both ofiicers 
 and soldiers fixing themselves in business somewhere as soon as 
 
 * This appears from the erasures on the printed bill, which is still preserved. 
 
 f Journals of Congress, iv., 747. 
 
 X S. p. Hildreth, Pioneer Settlers of Ohio, 88. Walker, 29. Letter of Rufus 
 
1785-1787. THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF AMERICA. 283 
 
 possible ; many of tbem are unable to lie long on tlieir oars ; " 
 but congress did not mind the spur. In tbe next year, under 
 the land ordinance of Grayson, Rufus Putnam was elected 
 a surveyor of land in the western territory for Massachu- 
 setts ; and as he could not at once enter on the service, another 
 brigadier-general, Benjamin Tupper of Chesterfield, in the 
 same state, was appointed for the time in his stead.* Tupper 
 repaired to the West to superintend the work confided to him ; 
 but disorderly Indians prevented the survey ; without having 
 advanced farther west than Pittsburgh, he returned home; 
 and, like almost every one who caught glimpses of the West, 
 he returned with a mind filled with the brightness of its 
 promise. 
 
 Toward the end of 1T85, Samuel Ilolden Parsons, the son 
 of a clergyman in Lyme, Connecticut, a graduate of Harvard, 
 an early and a wise and resolute patriot, in the war a brigadier- 
 general of the regular army, travelled to tlie West on public 
 business, descended the Ohio as far as its falls, and, full of the 
 idea of a settlement in that western country, wrote, before the 
 year went out, that on his way he had seen no place which 
 pleased him so much for a settlement as the country on the 
 Muskingum.f 
 
 In the treaty at Fort Stanwix, in 1734, the Six Nations re- 
 nounced to the United States all claims to the country west of 
 the Ohio. A treaty of January 1785, with the Wyandotte, 
 Delaware, Chippewa, and Ottawa nations, released the country 
 east of the Cuyahoga, and all the lands on the Ohio, south 
 of the line of portages from that river to the Great Miami 
 and the Maumee. On the last day of January 1786, George 
 Rogers Clark, the conqueror of the North- west, Richard Butler, 
 late a colonel in the army, and Samuel Ilolden Parsons, acting 
 under commissions from the United States, met the Shawnees 
 at the mouth of the Great Miami, and concluded with them a 
 treaty by which they acknowledged the sovereignty of the 
 United States over all their territory as described in the treaty 
 of peace with Great Britain, and for themselves renounced all 
 claim to property in any land east of the main branch of 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv., 520, 527, 547. 
 
 f William Frederick Poole inN. A. Review, liii., 331. 
 
284 THE FEDERAL CONYEl^TIOJ^'. b. hi. ; ch. vi. 
 
 the Great Miami.* In tliis way the Indian title to southern 
 Ohio, and all Ohio to the east of the Cuyahoga, was quieted. 
 
 Six days before the signature of the treaty with the Shaw- 
 nees, Kuf us Putnam and Benjamin Tupper, after a careful con- 
 sultation at the house of Putnam, in Rutland, pubHshed in the 
 newspapers of Massachusetts an invitation to form " the Ohio 
 Company " for purchasing and colonizing a large tract of land 
 between the Ohio and Lake Erie. The men chiefly engaged 
 in this enterprise were husbandmen of ISTew England, nurtured 
 in its schools and churches, laborious and methodical, patriots 
 who had been further trained in a seven years' war for freedom. 
 Have these men the creative power to plant a commonwealth ? 
 And is a republic the government under which political organi- 
 zation for great ends is the most easy and the most perfect ? 
 
 To bring the Ohio company into formal existence, all per- 
 sons in Massachusetts who wished to promote the scheme were 
 invited to meet in their respective counties on "Wednesday, the 
 fifteenth day of the next February, and choose delegates to 
 meet in Boston on Wednesday, the first day of March 1786, 
 at ten of the clock, then and there to consider and determine 
 on a general plan of association for the company. On the ap- 
 pointed day and hour, representatives of eight counties of 
 Massachusetts came together ; among others, from "Worcester 
 county, Pufus Putnam; from Suffolk, Winthrop Sargent; 
 from Essex, Manasseh Cutler, lately a chaplain in the army, 
 then minister at Ipswich ; from Middlesex, John Brooks ; from 
 Hampshire, Benjamin Tupper. Eufus Putnam was chosen 
 chairman of the meeting, Winthrop Sargent its secretary. On 
 the third of March, Putnam, Cutler, Brooks, Sargent, and 
 Cushing, its regularly appointed committee, reported an asso- 
 ciation of a thousand shares, each of one thousand dollars in 
 continental certificates, which were then the equivalent of one 
 hundred and twenty-five dollars in gold, with a further liability 
 to pay ten dollars in specie to meet the expenses of the agen- 
 cies. Men might join together and subscribe for one share. 
 
 A year was allowed for subscription. At its end, on the 
 eighth of March 1787, a meeting of the subscribers was held 
 at Boston, and Samuel Holden Parsons, Eufus Putnam, and 
 
 * U. S. Statutes at Large, vii., 15, 16-18, 26. 
 
1787. THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF AMERICA. 285 
 
 Manasseli Cutler were cliosen directors to make application to 
 congress for a purchase of lands adequate to the purposes of 
 the company. 
 
 The basis for the acquisition of a vast domain was settled 
 by the directors, and Parsons repaired to l^ew York to bring 
 the subject before congress. On the ninth of May 1787, the 
 same day on which the act for the government of the North-west 
 was ordered to a third reading on the morrow, the memorial of 
 Samuel Holden Parsons, agent of the associators of the Ohio 
 company, bearing date only of the preceding day, was presented.* 
 It interested every one. For vague hopes of colonization, here 
 stood a body of hardy pioneers ; ready to lead the way to the 
 rapid absorption of the domestic debt of the United States ; se- 
 lected from the choicest regiments of the army ; capable of self- 
 defence ; the protectors of all who should follow them ; men 
 skilled in the labors of the field and of artisans ; enterprising 
 and laborious ; trained in the severe morality and strict ortho- 
 doxy of the New England villages of that day. All was 
 changed. There was the same difference as between sending 
 out recruiting officers and giving marching orders to a regular 
 corps present with music and arms and banners. On the in- 
 stant the memorial was referred to a committee consisting of 
 Edward Carrington, Eufus King, IN'athan Dane, Madison, and 
 Egbert Benson — a great committee : its older members of con- 
 gress having worthy associates in Carrington and Benson, of 
 whom nothing was spoken but in praise of their faultless in- 
 tegrity and rightness of intention. 
 
 On the fourth day of July 1787, for the first time since the 
 eleventh of May, congress had a quorum. There were present 
 from the North, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey ; 
 from the South, Virginia, the two Carolinas, and Georgia, soon 
 to be joined by Delaware. The South had all in its own way. 
 The president of congress being absent, "William Grayson of 
 Virginia was elected the temporary president. 
 
 ■^" The memorial of Parsons is in his own handwriting. It is contained in vol. 
 xli. of Papers of the Old Congress, vol. viii., 226, of the Memorials. It is indorsed 
 in the handwriting of Roger Alden, " Memorial of Samuel II. Parsons, agent of the 
 associators for the purchase of lands on the Ohio. Read May ninth 1181. Re- 
 ferred to Mr. Carrington, :Mr. King, Mr. Dane, Mr. Madison, Mr. Benson. Acted 
 on July 23, 1181. See committee book." 
 
286 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. vi. 
 
 On Friday, the fifth, there was no quorum. In the even- 
 ing arriyed Manasseh Cutler, one of the three agents of the 
 Ohio company, sent to complete the negotiations for western 
 lands. On liis way to J^ew York, Cutler had visited Parsons, 
 his fellow-director, and now acted in full concert with him. 
 Carrington gave the new envoy a cordial welcome, introduced 
 him to members on the floor of congress, devoted immediate 
 attention to his proposals, and abeady, on the tenth of July, 
 his report granting to the Ohio company all that they desired 
 was read in congress.* 
 
 This report, which is entirely in the handwriting of Edward 
 Carrington, assigns as gifts a lot for the maintenance of public 
 schools in every township ; another lot for the purpose of re- 
 ligion ; and four complete townships, " which shall be good land, 
 and near the centre," for the purpose of a university. The land, 
 apart from the gifts, might be paid for in loan -office certificates 
 reduced to specie value or certificates of liquidated debts of the 
 United States. For bad land, expenses of surveying, and in- 
 cidental circumstances, the whole allowance was not to exceed 
 one third of a dollar an acre. The price, therefore, was about 
 sixty-six cents and two thirds for every acre, in United States 
 certificates of debt. But as these were then worth only twelve 
 cents on the dollar, the price of land in specie was between 
 eight and nine cents an acre. 
 
 On the ninth of July, Eichard Henry Lee took his seat in 
 congress. His presence formed an era. On that same day the 
 report for framing a western government, which was to have 
 had its third reading on the tenth of May, was referred to a 
 new committee t of seven, composed of Edward Carrington 
 
 * The business of congress was done with closed doors and with rigid secrecy. 
 Hence some slight misconceptions in the journal of Cutler. N. A. Review, liii., 
 334, etc. He says that on July sixth a committee was appointed to consider his 
 proposal. The committee was appointed not on July sixth, but on the ninth 
 of May, and was not changed. Its report is to be found in vol. v. of the Reports 
 of Committees, and in Old Papers of Congress, xix., 27. The report is in the 
 handwriting of Edward Carrington, and by his own hand is indorsed ; " Report of 
 Committee on Memorial of S. H. Parsons." Mr. Thomson's hand indorses fur- 
 ther : " Report of Mr. Carrington, Mr. King, Mr. Dane, Mr. Madison, Mr. Benson. 
 Read July 10th, 1787. Order of the day for the eleventh." On what day it 
 was presented is not recorded. 
 
 f In the Journals of Congress, iv., 751, for the lltb of July, mention is made 
 
1787. THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF AMERICA. 287 
 
 and Dane, Eichard Henry Lee, Kean of Soutli Carolina, and 
 Melancthon Smith of New York. There were then in con- 
 gress five southern states to three of the JS^orth ; on the com- 
 mittee two northern men to three from the South, of whom the 
 two ablest were Virginians. 
 
 The committee, animated by the j^resence of Lee, went to 
 its work in good earnest. Dane, who had been actively em- 
 ployed on the colonial government for more than a year, and 
 for about ten months had served on the committee which had 
 the subject in charge, acted the part of scribe. Like Smith 
 and Lee, he had opposed a federal convention for the reform 
 of the constitution. The three agreed very well together, 
 though Dane secretly harbored the wish of finding in the West 
 an ally for " eastern politics." They were pressed for time, 
 and found it necessary finally to adopt the best system they 
 could get. At first they took up the plan reported by Mon- 
 roe ; but new ideas were started ; and they worked with so 
 much industry that on the eleventh of July their report of an 
 ordinance for the government of the territory of the United 
 States north-west of the river Ohio was read for its first time 
 in congress. 
 
 The ordinance imbodied the best parts of the work of their 
 predecessors. For the beginning they made the whole north- 
 western territory one district, of which all the officers appointed 
 by congress were to take an oath of fidelity as well as of office. 
 Jefferson, in his ordinance for the sale of lands, had taken care 
 for the equal descent of real estate, as well as other property, 
 to children of both sexes. This was adopted and expressed in 
 the forms of the laws of Massachusetts. The rule of Jefferson 
 was followed in requiring no property qualification for an elect- 
 or ; but was not extended, as Jefferson had done, to the officers 
 to be elected. 
 
 The committee then proceeded to establish articles of com- 
 pact, not to be repealed except by the consent of the original 
 states and the people and states in the territory. Among these, 
 
 that the report of a committee touching the temporary government for the west- 
 ern territory had been referred to the committee. I find an indorsement in the 
 State Department on one of the papers that the day on which that reference was 
 made was July ninth. 
 
288 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; ch. vi. 
 
 as in Massacliusetts and Virginia, were freedom of religions 
 worship and of religions thought ; and various articles from 
 the usual bills of rights of the states. 
 
 The next clause bears in every word the impress of the 
 mind of Richard Henry Lee. " No law ought ever to be made 
 in said territory that shall in any manner whatever interfere 
 with or conflict with private contracts or engagements, honafide 
 and without fraud previously formed." This regulation re- 
 lated particularly to the abuse of paper money.* 
 
 The third article recognised, like the constitution of Massa- 
 chusetts, and like the letter of Rufus Putnam of 1783,t that 
 religion, morality, and knowledge are necessary to good govern- 
 ment and the happiness of mankind, and declared that schools 
 and the means of education shall forever be encouraged. 
 
 The utmost good faith was enjoined toward the Indians ; 
 their lands and property, their rights and liberty, were ordered 
 to be protected by laws founded in justice and humanity ; so 
 that peace and friendship with them might ever be preserved. 
 
 The new states, by compact which neither party alone 
 could change, became, and were forever to remain, a part of 
 the United States of America. The waters leading into the 
 Mississippi and St. Lawrence, and the carrying places between 
 them, according to the successful motion of Grayson and King, 
 were made common highways and forever free. The whole 
 territory was divided into three states only, the population re- 
 quired for the admission of any one of them to the union was 
 fixed at sixty thousand ; but both these clauses were subject to 
 the future judgment of congress. The prayer of the Ohio 
 
 * " Cette disposition porte particulieremcnt sur I'abus du papier monnaie." 
 Otto to Montmorin, successor of Vergennes at Versailles, 20 July 1787. R. H. 
 Lee to George Mason, Chantilly, 15 May 1787. Life of Richard Henry Lee, ii., 
 71-73, Lee hated paper money, and therefore had entreated his friends in the 
 convention at Philadelphia to take from the states the right of issuing it. More- 
 over, he piqued himself upon the originality of his suggestion : " a proposition 
 that I have not heard mentioned." Compare Lee to Washington, in Sparks's Let- 
 ters to Washington, iv., 174. More than forty-two years later Dane claimed for 
 himself " originality " in regard to the clause against impairing contracts [Mas- 
 sachusetts Historical Society Proceedings, 1867 to 1869, p. 479], but contemporary 
 evidence points to R. H. Lee as one with whom he must at least divide the 
 honor. 
 
 \ The proposals presented by Cutler arc in the handwriting of Parsons. 
 
1787. THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF AMERICA. 289 
 
 company had been but tliis : " The settlers shall be under the 
 immediate government of congress in such mode and for such 
 time as congress shall judge proper ; " the ordinance contained 
 no allusion to slavery ; and in that form it received its first 
 reading and was ordered to be printed. 
 
 Grayson, then the presiding ofiicer of congress, had always 
 opposed slavery. Two years before he had wished success to 
 the attempt of King for its restriction ; and everything points 
 to him * as the immediate cause of the tranquil spirit of dis- 
 interested statesmanship which took possession of every south- 
 ern man in the assembly. Of the members of Yirginia, 
 Richard Henry Lee had stood against Jefferson on this very 
 question ; but now he acted with Grayson, and from the states 
 of which no man had yielded before, every one chose the part 
 which was to bring on their memory the benedictions of all 
 coming ages. Obeying an intimation from the South, Nathan 
 Dane copied from Jefferson the prohibition of involuntary 
 servitude in the territory, and quieted alarm by adding from the 
 report of King a clause for the delivering up of the fugitive 
 slave. This at the second reading of the ordinance he moved 
 as a sixth article of compact, and, on the thirteenth day of July 
 1787, the great statute forbidding slavery to cross the river 
 Ohio was passed by the vote of Georgia, South Carolina, North 
 Carolina, Virginia, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and 
 Massachusetts, all the states that were then present in congress. 
 Pennsylvania and three states of New England were absent ; 
 
 * William Grayson voted for King's motion of reference, by which the prohi- 
 bition of slavery was to be immediate ; he expressed the hope that congress would 
 be liberal enough to adopt King's motion ; he gave, more than any other man in 
 congress, efficient attention to the territorial questions ; in 1785 he framed and 
 carried through congress an ordinance for the sale of western lands ; his influence 
 as president of congress was great ; his record as against slavery is clearer than 
 that of any other southern man who was present in 1787. The assent of Virginia 
 being requisite to the validity of the ordinance, he entreated Monroe to obtain 
 tliat consent. The consent was not obtained. Though in shattered health, he 
 then became a member of the next Virginia legislature, and was conspicuous in 
 obtaining the assent of Virginia. Add to this in the debate on excluding slavery 
 from the territory of Arkansas, Hugh Nelson of Virginia was quoted as having 
 ascribed the measure to Grayson. Austin Scott fell upon, and was so good as to 
 point out to me, this passage in Annals of Congress for February 1819, column 
 1225. Thus far no direct report of Nelson's speech has been found. 
 VOL. TI. — 19 
 
290 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; en. vi. 
 
 Maryland only of the South. Of the eighteen members of 
 congress who answered to their names, every one said " aye " 
 excepting Abraham Yates the yonnger of New York, who in- 
 sisted on leaving to all future ages a record of his want of good 
 judgment, right feeling, and common sense. 
 
 Thomas Jefferson first summoned congress to prohibit slav- 
 ery in all the territory of the United States ; Euf us King lifted 
 up the measure when it lay almost lifeless on the ground, and 
 suggested the immediate instead of the prospective prohibition ; 
 a congress composed of fi.ve southern states to one from ]New 
 England, and two from the middle states, headed by "William 
 Grayson, supported by Eichard Henry Lee, and using Nathan 
 Dane as scribe, carried the measure to the goal in the amended 
 form in which King had caused it to be referred to a committee ; 
 and, as Jefferson had proposed, placed it under the sanction 
 of an irrevocable compact.* 
 
 The ordinance being passed, the terms of a sale between 
 the United States and Manasseh Cutler and Winthrop Sargent, 
 as agents of the Ohio company, were rapidly brought to a 
 close, substantially on the basis of the report of Carrington.f 
 
 The occupation of the purchased lands began immediately, 
 and proceeded with the order, courage, and regularity of men 
 accustomed to the discipline of soldiers. '^ 'No colony in 
 America," said Washington in his joy, " was ever settled un- 
 der such favorable auspices as that which has just commenced 
 at the Muskingum. Information, property, and strength will 
 be its characteristics. I know many of the settlers personally, 
 and there never were men better calculated to promote the 
 welfare of such a community." :J: Before a year had passed by, 
 free labor kejDt its sleepless watch on the Ohio. 
 
 But this was not enough. Virginia had retained the right 
 to a very large tract north-west of the Ohio ; and should she 
 consent that her own sons should be forbidden to cross the 
 river with their slaves to her own lands ? 
 
 It was necessary for her to give her consent before the or- 
 dinance could be secure ; and Grayson earnestly entreated 
 
 * Nathan Dane to Rufiis King, 16 July llSI. 
 
 f Compare Carrington's report with its amended form in Journals of Con 
 gress, iv., Appendix 17. t Sparks, ix., 385. 
 
1787. THE COLONIAL SYSTEM OF AMERICA. 291 
 
 Monroe to gain that consent before the year should go out. 
 But Monroe was not equal to the task, and nothing was accom- 
 plished. 
 
 At the next election of the assembly of Yirginia, Grayson, 
 who was not a candidate in the preceding or the following 
 year, was chosen a delegate ; and then a powerful committee, 
 on which were Carrington, Monroe, Edmund Eandolph, and 
 Grayson, successfully brought forward the bill by which Yir- 
 ginia confirmed the ordinance for the colonization of all the 
 territory then in the possession of the United States by free- 
 men alone. 
 
 The white men of that day everywhere held themselves 
 bound to respect and protect the black men in their liberty 
 and property. The suffrage was not as yet regarded as a right 
 incident to manhood, and could be extended only according to 
 the judgment of those who were found in possession of it. 
 When in 1785 an act providing for the gradual abolition of 
 slavery within the state of 'New York, while it placed the chil- 
 dren born of slaves in the rank of citizens, deprived them of 
 the privileges of electors, the council of revision, Clinton and 
 Sloss Hobart being present, and adopting the report of Chan- 
 cellor Livingston, negatived the act, because, " in violation of 
 the rules of justice and against the letter and spirit of the con- 
 stitution," it disfranchised the black, mulatto, and mustee citi- 
 zens who had heretofore been entitled to a vote. The veto 
 prevailed ; ^ and in the state of New York the colored man 
 retained his impartial right of suffrage till the constitution of 
 1821. Yirginia, which continued to recognise free negroes as 
 citizens, in the session in which it sanctioned the north-western 
 ordinance, enacted that any person who should be convicted 
 of stealing or selling any free person for a slave shall suffer 
 death without benefit of clergy. f This was the protection 
 which Yirginia, when the constitution was forming, extended 
 to the black man. 
 
 * Street's New York Couucil of iievisiou, 268, 2G9. f Heniag, xii., 531 
 
292 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; en. vii. 
 
 CHAPTER yil. 
 
 the constitution in detail. the powers of congeess. 
 6 August to 10 September 1787. 
 
 The twentj-tliree resolutions of the convention were dis- 
 tributed by the committee of detail into as many articles, which 
 included new subjects of the gravest moment. On the sixth 
 of August 1787 every member of the convention received a 
 copy of this draft of a constitution, printed on broadsides in 
 large type, with wide spaces and margin for minutes of amend- 
 ments.* The experience of more than two months had in- 
 spired its members with the courage and the disposition to 
 make still bolder grants of power to the union. 
 
 The instrument f opens with the sublime words : " We, the 
 people of the states," enumerating JNew Hampshire and every 
 other of the thirteen, " do ordain, declare, and establish the 
 following constitution for the government of ourselves and our 
 posterity." X 
 
 When in 1776 " tlie good people " of thirteen colonies, each 
 having an organized separate home government, and each 
 hitherto forming an integral part of one common empire, 
 jointly prepared to declare themselves free and independent 
 states, it was their first care to ascertain of whom they were 
 composed. The question they agreed to investigate and decide 
 
 * Of these copies six have been examined, including that of the president of 
 the convention, and, as is believed, that of its secretary. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1226; Elliot, 376. 
 
 i " We the people of Massachusetts — do — ordain and establish the following 
 —constitution of civil government for ourselves and posterity." Preamble to the 
 first constitution of Massachusetts. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 293 
 
 by a joint act of tliem all. For this end congress selected from 
 its numbers five of its ablest jurists and most trusted states- 
 men : Jolm Adams of Massachusetts, Thomas Jefferson of Vir- 
 ginia, Edward Rutledge of South Carolina, James Wilson of 
 Pennsylvania, and Robert R. Livingston of 'New York ; the 
 fairest representation that could have been made of New Eng- 
 land, of the South, and of the central states. The committee 
 thought not of embarrassing themselves with the introduction 
 of any new theory of citizenship ; they looked solely for exist- 
 ing facts. They found colonies with well-known territorial 
 boundaries ; and inhabitants of the territory of each colony ; 
 and their unanimous report, unanimously accepted by congress, 
 was : " All persons abiding within any of the United Colonies, ' 
 and deriving protection from the laws of the same, owe allegi- 
 ance to the said laws, and are members of such colony." * 
 From " persons making a visitation or temporary stay," only a 
 secondary allegiance was held to be due. 
 
 When the articles of confederation w^ere framed with the 
 grand principle of intercitizenship, which gave to the Ameri- 
 can confederation a superiority over every one that preceded r 
 it, the same definition of membership of the community was >r 
 repeated, except that intercitizenshij) was not extended to the 
 pauper, or the vagabond, or the fugitive from justice, or the 
 slave. And now these free inhabitants of every one of the 
 United States, this collective people, proclaim their common 
 intention, by their own innate life, to institute a general gov- 
 ernment. 
 
 For the name of the government they chose " The United 
 States of America " ; words which expressed unity in plural- 
 ity and being endeared by usage were preferred to any new 
 description. 
 
 That there might be no room to question where paramount 
 allegiance would be due, the second article declared : " The ^ 
 government shall consist of supreme legislative, executive, and 
 judicial powers." f 
 
 To maintain that supremacy, the legislature of the United 7 
 States was itself authorized to carry into execution all powers 
 vested by this new constitution in the government of the Unit- 
 
 * Journals of Congress for 5, 17, and 24 June 17V6. f Gilpin, 1226 ; Elliot, 377. 
 
J 
 
 V 
 
 ^ 
 
 294 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION". b. iii. ; ch. vii. 
 
 ed States, or in any of its departments or offices.* The name 
 congress was adopted to mark the two branches of the legisla- 
 ture, which were now named the house of representatives and 
 the senate ; the house still taking precedence as the first branch. 
 The executive was henceforward known as " the President." 
 r The scheme of erecting a general government on the au- 
 \ thoritj of the state legislatures was discarded ; and the states 
 were enjoined to prescribe for the election of the members of 
 each branch regulations subject to be altered by the legislature 
 of the United States ; but the convention itself, in its last days, 
 unanimously reserved to the states alone the right to establish 
 the places for choosing senators. f 
 
 To ensure the continuous succession of the government, the 
 legislature was ordered to meet on the first Monday in Decem- 
 ber in every year, % " unless," added the convention, " congress 
 should by law appoint a different day." 
 
 To complete the independence of congress, provision needed 
 to be made for the supj)ort of its members. The committee of 
 detail left them to be paid for their services by their respective 
 states ; but this mode would impair the self-sustaining charac- 
 ter of the government. Ellsworth, avowing a change of opin- 
 ion, moved that they should be paid out of the Treasury of the 
 United States.* " If the general legislature," said Dickinson, 
 " should be left dependent on the state legislatures, it would 
 be happy for us if we had never met in this room." The mo- 
 tion of Ellsworth was carried by nine states against Massachu- 
 setts and South Carolina. || The compensation which he and 
 Sherman would have fixed at five dollars a day, and the same 
 for every thirty miles of travel, was left '' to be ascertained by 
 law." ^ 
 
 In the distribution of representatives among the states no 
 change was made ; but to the rule of one member of the house 
 for every forty thousand inhabitants Madison objected that in 
 the coming increase of population it would render the number 
 excessive. " The government," replied Gorham, " will not 
 
 * Gilpin, 1233 ; Elliot, 379. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1229, 1279, 1281, 1232, 1548, 1608 ; Elliot, 377, 401, 402, 559. 
 X Gilpin, 1227 ; Elliot, 377. * Gilpin, 931, 1326 ; Elliot, 226, 425. 
 
 I Gilpin, 1329 ; Elliot, 427. ^ Gilpin, 1330 ; Elliot, 427. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF OOJirGRESS. 295 
 
 last so long as to produce tliis effect. Can it be supposed that 
 this vast country, including the western territory, will one hun- 
 dred and fifty years hence remain one nation ? " '^ The clause 
 was for the time unanimously made to read : " not exceeding 
 one for every forty thousand." 
 
 As the first qualification for membership of the legislature, 
 it was agreed, and it so remains, that the candidate at the time 
 of his election should be an inhabitant of the state in which he 
 should be chosen. It is not required that a representative 
 should reside in the district which he may be elected to repre- 
 sent. 
 
 Citizenship was indispensable ; and, before a comer from a 
 foreign country could be elected to the house, he must, accord- 
 ing to the report, have been a citizen of the United States for 
 at least three years ; before eligibility to the senate, for at least 
 four. " I do not choose," s^id^Mason, " to let foreigners and 
 adventurers make laws for us and govern us without that local 
 knowledge which ought to be possessed by the representative." 
 And he moved for seven years instead of three.f To this all 
 the states agreed except Connecticut. 
 
 From respect to Wilson, who was born and educated in 
 Scotland, the subject was taken up once more. Gerry, on the 
 thirteenth, wished none to be elected but men born in the 
 land. Williamson preferred a residence of nine years to 
 seven. :j: Hamilton proposed to require only citizenship and 
 inhabitancy,* and Madison seconded him. In proof of the 
 advantage of encouraging emigration, Wilson cited Pennsyl- 
 vania, the youngest settlement on the Atlantic except Georgia, 
 yet among the foremost in population and prosperity ; almost 
 all the general ofiicers of her line in the late army and three of 
 her deputies to the convention — Bobert Morris, Fitzsimons, 
 and himself — were not natives. || But Connecticut, Pennsyl- 
 vania, Maryland, and Virginia, which voted with Hamilton 
 and Madison, were overpowered by the seven other states, of 
 which, on this question, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and 
 Georgia were the most stubborn.^ 
 
 * Gilpin, 1263 ; Elliot, 392. # Gilpin, 1299, 1300 ; Elliot, 411. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1256, 1257 ; Elliot, 389. || Gilpin, 1300, 1301 ; Elliot, 412. 
 i Gilpin, 1299 ; Elliot, 411. ^ Gilpin, 1301 ; Elliot, 412. 
 
296 THE FEDERAL CONVENTIOX. b. m. ; en. vii. 
 
 Goiiverneur Morris desired that tlie proviso of seven years 
 should not affect any person then a citizen. On this candid 
 motion 'New Jersey joined the four more liberal states ; but 
 Rutledge, Charles Pinckney, Mason, and Baldwin spoke with 
 inveterate tenacity for the disfranchisement against Gorham, 
 Madison, Morris, and Wilson ; and the motion was lost by five 
 states to six."^ 
 
 For a senator, citizenship for nine years was required; 
 Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Maryland alone finding the 
 number of years excessive.f Three days later, power was 
 vested in the legislature of the United States to establish a uni- 
 form rule of naturalization throughout the United States. :j; 
 
 The committee of detail had evaded the question of a prop- 
 erty qualification for the members of the federal legislature 
 and other branches of the government by referring it to legis- 
 lative discretion. Charles Pinckney, who wished to require 
 for the president a fortune of not less than a hundred thousand 
 dollars, for a judge half as much, and a like proportion for the 
 members of the national legislature, ventured no more than to 
 move generally that a property qualification should be required 
 of them all.* Franklin made answer : " I dislike everything 
 that tends to debase the spirit of the common people. If 
 honesty is often the companion of wealth, and if poverty is 
 exposed to peculiar temptation, the possession of property 
 Increases the desire for more. Some of the greatest rogues I 
 was ever acquainted with were the richest rogues. Kemember, 
 the scripture requires in rulers that they should be men hating 
 covetousness. If this constitution should betray a great par- 
 ( tiality to the rich, it will not only hurt us in the esteem of the 
 \ most liberal and enlightened men in Europe, but discourage 
 ]the common people from removing to this country." || The 
 ^motion was rejected by a general "no." The question was for 
 / a while left open, but the constitution finally escaped without 
 ,■ imposing a property qualification on any person in the public 
 ^ employ. 
 
 Various efforts were made by Gorham, Mercer, King, and 
 
 * Gilpin, 1301-1305 ; Elliot, 412-414. # Gilpin, 1283, 1284 ; Elliot, 402, 403. 
 t Gilpin, 1305 ; Elliot, 414. | Gilpin, 1284, 1285 ; Elliot, 403. 
 
 X Elliot, i., 245. 
 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 297 
 
 Gouverneur Morris to follow the precedent of the British par- 
 liament, and constitute a less number than a majority in each 
 house sufficient for a quorum, lest the secession of a few mem- 
 bers should fatally interrupt the course of public business. 
 But, by the exertions of Wilson and Ellsworth, Randolph and 
 Madison, power was all but unanimously given to each branch 
 to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner 
 and under such penalties as each house might provide. More- 
 over, each house received the power, unknown to the confed- 
 eracy, to expel a member with the concurrence of two thirds 
 of those voting.* 
 
 What should distinguish the "electors" of the United 
 States from their citizens ? the constituency of the house of 
 representatives of the United States from the people ? The 
 report of the committee ran thus : " The qualifications of the 
 electors shall be the same, from time to time, as those of the 
 electors in the several states of the most numerous branch of 
 their own legislatures." f Gouverneur Morris desired to re- 
 strain the right of suffrage to freeholders ; and he thought it 
 not proper that the quahfications of the national legislature 
 should depend on the will of the states. " The states," said 
 Ellsworth, " are the best judges of the circumstances and tem- 
 per of their own people." :j: " Eight or nine states," remarked 
 Mason, "'have extended the right of suffrage beyond the free- 
 holders. What will the people there say if any should be 
 disfranchised ? " * "' Abridgments of the right of suffrage," 
 declared Butler, "tend to revolution." "The freeholders of 
 the country," replied Dickinson, " are the best guardians of 
 liberty ; and the restriction of the right to them is a necessary 
 defence against the dangerous influence of those multitudes 
 without property and without principle, ^^dth which our coun- 
 try, like all others, will in time abound. As to the unpopu- 
 larity of the innovation, it is chimerical. The great mass of 
 our citizens is composed at this time of freeholders, and will 
 be pleased with it." " Ought not every man who pays a tax," 
 asked Ellsworth, " to vote for the representative who is to levy 
 and dispose of his money ? " 1 " The time," said Gouverneur 
 
 * Gilpin, 1291 ; Elliot, 407. f Gilpin, 1227 ; Elliot, 377. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1250; Elliot, 386. ^ Ibid. | Gilpin, 1251 ; Elliot, 386. 
 
 t 
 
% 
 
 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. vn. 
 
 Morris, "is not distant wlien tliis country will abound with 
 mechanics and manufacturers, who will receive their bread 
 from their employers. Will such men be the secure and faith- 
 ful guardians of hbertj — the impregnable barrier against aris- 
 tocracy? The ignorant and the dependent can be as little 
 trusted with the public interest as children. Mne tenths of 
 the people are at present freeholders, and these will certainly 
 be pleased with the restriction." ^ " The true idea," said Ma- 
 son, " is that every man having evidence of attachment to the 
 society, and permanent common interest with it, ought to share 
 in all its rights and privileges." " In several of the states," 
 said Madison, " a freehold is now the qualification. Yiewing 
 the subject in its merits alone, the freeholders of the country 
 would be the safest depositories of republican liberty. In 
 future times, a great majority of the people will not only be 
 without property in land, but property of any sort. These 
 will either combine under the influence of their common situa- 
 tion, in which case the rights of property and the public lib- 
 erty will not be secure in their hands, or, what is more proba- 
 ble, they will become the tools of opulence and ambition ; in 
 w^hich case there will be equal danger on another side." f 
 Franklin reasoned against the restriction from the nobleness 
 of character that the possession of the electoral franchise in- 
 spires. :J: " The idea of restraining the right of suffrage to the 
 freeholders," said Eutledge, " would create division among the 
 people, and make enemies of all those who should be exclud- 
 ed." * The movement of Morris toward a freehold qualifica- 
 tion gained no vote but that of Delaware ; and the section as 
 reported was imanimously approved. 
 
 SEach state was therefore left to fix for itself within its 
 own limits its conditions of suffrage ; but where, as in New 
 York and Maryland, a discrimination was made in different 
 elections, the convention applied the most liberal rule adopted 
 in the state to the elections of members of congress, accepting 
 in advance any extensions of the suffrage that in any of the 
 states might grow out of the development of republican insti- 
 tutions. Plad the convention established a freehold or other 
 
 * Gilpin, 1252 ; Elliot, 886, 387. t Gilpin, 1254 ; Elliot, 388. 
 
 t Gilpin, 1253 ; Elliot, 38Y. « Gilpin, 1255 ; Elliot, 383. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 299 
 
 qualification of its own, it must liave taken upon itself the 
 introduction of this restriction into every one of the states of 
 the union. 
 
 On the question of representation the only embarrassmentl 
 that remained grew out of that part of the report of the com- 
 mittee of detail which sanctioned the perpetual continuance 
 of the slave-trade. Everywhere, always, by everybody, in stat- 
 utes alike of Virginia and South Carolina, in speeches, in let- 
 ters, slavery in those days was spoken of as an evil. Every- 
 where in the land, the free negro always, the slave from the 
 instant of his emancipation, belonged to the class of citizens, 
 though in Virginia, South Carolina and Georgia, and in Dela- 
 ware, for all except those who before 1787 had already ac- 
 quired the elective franchise,* color barred the way to the 
 ballot-box. The convention did nothing to diminish the rights 
 of black men ; and, to the incapacities under which they labored 
 in any of the states, it was careful to add no new one. Madi- 
 son, in the following February, recommending the constitution 
 for ratification, writes : " It is admitted that, if the laws were 
 to restore the rights which have been taken away, the negroes 
 could no longer be refused an equal share of representation 
 with the other inhabitants." f The convention had agreed to 
 the enumeration of two fifths of the slaves in the representa- 
 tive population ; but a new complication was introduced by 
 the sanction which the committee of detail had lent to the per-J 
 petuity of the slave-trade. 
 
 King had hoped for some compromise on the subject of 
 the slave-trade and slavery. " I never can agree," said he, in 
 the debate of the eighth, " to let slaves be imported without 
 limitation of time, and be represented in the national legisla- 
 ture." i 
 
 Gouvemeur Morris then moved that there should be no^ 
 representation but of " free inhabitants." " I never will con- / 
 cur in upholding domestic slavery. It is a nefarious institu- 7 
 tion. It is the curse of heaven on the states where it prevails. 1 
 Com]3are the free regions of the middle states, where a rich \ 
 and noble cultivation marks the prosperity and happiness of 
 
 * I so interpret the Delaware statute of 17S7. f Federalist, No. liv. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1262; Elliot, 392. 
 
300 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; en. vii. 
 
 the people, with the misery and poverty which overspread tlie 
 barren wastes of Virginia, Maryland, and the other states 
 having slaves. Travel through the whole continent, and you 
 behold the prospect continually varying with the appearance 
 and disappearance of slavery. The moment you leave the 
 eastern states and enter 'New York, the effects of the institu- 
 tion become visible. Passing through the Jerseys and enter- 
 ing Pennsylvania, every criterion of superior improvement 
 witnesses the change; proceed southwardly, and every step 
 you take through the great regions of slaves presents a desert 
 increasing with the increasing proportion of these wretched 
 beings. Upon what principle shall slaves be computed in the 
 representation ? Are they men ? Then make them citizens, 
 and let them vote. Are they property ? Why, then, is no 
 other property included ? The houses in this city are worth 
 more than . all the wretched slaves who cover the rice-swamps 
 of South Carolina. The admission of slaves into the represen- 
 tation, when fairly explained, comes to this : that the inhabit- 
 ant of Georgia and South Carolina who goes to the coast of 
 Africa, and in defiance of the most sacred laws of humanity 
 tears away his fellow-creatures from their dearest connections 
 and damns them to the most cruel bondage, shall have more 
 votes in a government instituted for protection of the rights of 
 mankind than tlie citizen of Pennsylvania or I^ew Jersey, who 
 views with a laudable horror so nefarious a practice. I will add, 
 that domestic slavery is the most prominent feature in the aris- 
 tocratic countenance of the proposed constitution. The vassal- 
 age of the poor has ever been the favorite offspring of aristoc- 
 racy. And what is the proposed compensation to the northern 
 states for a sacrifice of every principle of right, of every im- 
 pulse of humanity ? They are to bind themselves to march 
 their militia for the defence of the southern states against those 
 very slaves of whom they complain. They must supply vessels 
 and seamen, in case of foreign attack. The legislature will 
 have indefinite power to tax them by excises and duties on im- 
 ports, both of which will fall heavier on them than on the 
 southern inhabitants. On the other side, the southern states 
 are not to be restrained from importing fresh supplies of 
 wretched Africans, at once to increase the danger of attack and 
 
( 
 
 1787. THE POWEPwS OF COI^GRESS. 301 
 
 the difficulty of defence ; nay, they are to be encouraged to it 
 by an assurance of having their votes in the national govern- 
 ment increased in proportion ; and are, at the same time, to 
 have their exports and their slaves exempt from all contribu- 
 tions for the public service. I mil sooner submit myself to a ) 
 tax for paying for all the negroes in the United States than | 
 saddle posterity with such a constitution." "^ Dayton seconded ^> 
 the motion, that his sentiments on the subject might appear, 
 whatever might be the fate of the amendment, f Charles 
 Pinclmey " considered the fisheries and the western frontier as 
 more burdensome to the United States than the slaves." % 
 Wilson thought an agreement to the clause would be no bar to 
 the object of the motion, which itself was premature. I^ew 
 Jersey voted aye, ten states in the negative. So ended the 
 skirmish preliminary to the struggle on the continuance of the 
 slave-trade. 
 
 Great as was the advance from the articles of the confeder- 
 acy, the new grants, not* less than the old ones, of power to the 
 legislature of the United States to lay taxes, duties, imposts, 
 and excises, and collect them ; to regulate foreign and domes- 
 tic commerce ; alone to coin money and regulate the value of 
 foreign coin ; to fix the standard of weights and measures ; 
 and establish post-offices, were accepted on the sixteenth, with 
 little difference of opinion.* 
 
 E'o one disputed the necessity of clothing the United 
 States with power " to borrow money." The committee of de- 
 tail added a continuance of the permission " to emit bills on 
 the credit of the United States." | Four years before, Hamil- 
 ton, in his careful enumeration of the defects in the confeder- 
 ation, pronounced that this authority " to emit an unfunded 
 paper as the sign of value ought not to continue a formal part 
 of the constitution, nor ever, hereafter, to be employed ; being, 
 in its nature, pregnant with abuses, and liable to be made the 
 engine of imposition and fraud; holding out temptations 
 equally pernicious to the integrity of government and to the 
 morals of the people." ^ 
 
 * Gilpin, 1263-1265 ; Elliot, 392, 393. # Gilpin, 1343 ; Elliot, 434. 
 t Gilpin, 1265 ; Elliot, 393. \ Gilpin, 1232 ; Elliot, 378. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1265, 1266; Elliot, 393-397. ^ Hamilton's Works, ii., 271. 
 
302 THE FEDERAL OONVENTION". b. iii. ; ch. vii. 
 
 Gouverneiir Morris on the fifteenth recited the history of 
 paper emissions and the perseverance of the legislative assem- 
 Llies in repeating them, though well aware of all their distress- 
 ing efl'ects, and drew the inference that, were the national legis- 
 lature formed and a war to break out, this ruinous expedient, 
 if not guarded against, w^ould be again resorted to.* On the 
 sixteenth he moved to strike out the power to emit bills on the 
 credit of the United States. " If the United States," said he, 
 " have credit, such bills will be unnecessary ; if they have not, 
 they will be unjust and useless." f Butler was urgent for dis- 
 arming the government of such a power, and seconded the 
 motion. :j: It obtained the acquiescence of Madison. 
 
 Mason of Virginia " had a mortal hatred to paper money, 
 yet, as he could not foresee all emergencies, he was unwilling 
 to tie the hands of the legislature. The late war could not 
 have been carried on had such a prohibition existed." * " The 
 power," said Gorham, ^' as far as it will be necessary or safe, is 
 involved in that of borrowing money." || Mercer of Mary- 
 land was unwilling to deny to the government a discretion on 
 this point ; besides, he held it impolitic to excite the opposition 
 to the constitution of all those who, like himself, were friends 
 to paper money."^ " This," said Ellsworth, " is a favorable 
 moment to shut and bar the door against paper money, which 
 can in no case be necessary. The power may do harm, never 
 good. Give the government credit, and other resources will 
 offer." ^ Eandolph, notwithstanding his antipathy to paper 
 money, could not foresee all the occasions that might arise. J 
 "Paper money," said Wilson, "can never succeed while its 
 mischiefs are remembered ; and, as long as it can be resorted 
 to, it will be a bar to other resources." $ " Rather than give 
 the power," said John Langdon of !N'ew Hampshire, " I would 
 reject the whole plan." J 
 
 With the full recollection of the need, or seeming need, of 
 paper money in the revolution, with the menace of danger in 
 
 * Gilpin, 1334; Elliot, 429. ^ Gilpin, 1344, 1345 ; Elliot, 435. 
 f Gilpin, 1343 ; Elliot, 434. Gilpin, 1345 ; Elliot, 435. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1344 ; Elliot, 434. I Ibid. 
 
 # Ibid. I Ibid. 
 
 I Gilpin, 1344 ; Elliot, 435. | Gilpin, 1346 ; Elliot, 435. 
 
1787. THE POWEKS OF CONGRESS. 303 
 
 future time of war from its prohibition, authority to issue bills | 
 of credit that should be legal-tender was refused to the general t 
 government by the vote of nine states against New Jersey \ 
 and Maryland. It was Madison who decided the vote of Yir-^ 
 ginia ; and he has left his testimony that " the pretext for a I 
 paper currency, and particularly for making the bills a tender, \y^ 
 either for public or private debts, was cut off." This is the ( 
 interpretation of the clause, made at the time of its adoption I 
 alike by its authors and by its opponents,* accepted by all the \ 
 statesmen of that age, not open to dispute because too clear for j 
 argument, and never disputed so long as any one man who tooku/ 
 part in framing the constitution remained alive. 
 
 History can not name a man who has gained enduring I 
 honor by causing the issue of paper money. Wherever such ji 
 
 * For Madison's narrative and opinion, see Gilpin, 1344-1346, and note on 
 1346 ; Elliot, 434, 435. The accuracy of the historical sketch of Luther Martin, 
 officially addressed, 27 January 1788, to the speaker of the house of delegates of 
 Maryland, has in ninety-six years never been questioned. It may be found in 
 Elliot, i., 369, 370, and is as follows : 
 
 " By our original Articles of Confederation, the congress have power to borrow 
 money and emit bills of credit on the credit of the United States ; agreeable to 
 which was the report on this system as made by the committee of detail. When we 
 came to this part of the report, a motion was made to strike out the words ' to emit 
 bills of credit.' Against the motion we urged that it would be improper to deprive 
 the congress of that power ; that it would be a novelty unprecedented to establish 
 a government which should not have such authority ; that it was impossible to look 
 forward into futurity so far as to decide that events might not happen that should 
 render the exercise of such a power absolutely necessary ; and that we doubted 
 whether, if a war should take place, it would be possible for this country to defend 
 itself without having recourse to paper credit, in which case there would be a 
 necessity of becoming a prey to our enemies or violating the constitution of our 
 government ; and that, considering the administration of the government would be 
 principally in the hands of the wealthy, there could be little reason to fear an 
 abuse of the power by an unnecessary or injurious exercise of it. But, sir, a ma- 
 jority of the convention, being wise beyond every event, and being willing to risk 
 any political evil rather than admit the idea of a paper emission in any possible 
 case, refused to trust this authority to a government to which they were lavishing 
 the most unlimited powers of taxation, and to the mercy of which they were will- 
 ing blindly to trust the liberty and property of the citizens of every state in the 
 union ; and they erased that clause from the system." 
 
 With regard to the paper money issued during the late civil war, congress 
 healed the difficulty by obtaining, in the fourteenth amendment, from the whole 
 country what may be regarded as an act of indemnity ; and, while the country 
 made itself responsible for the debt which was contracted, the amendment pre 
 served the original clause of the constitution in its full integrity and vigor. 
 
304 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; en. vii. 
 
 ' [ paper lias been employed, it has in every case thrown upon its 
 authors the burden of exculpation under the plea of pressing 
 necessity. 
 
 ^ /* Paper money has no hold, and from its very nature can ac- 
 I quire no hold, on the conscience or affections of the people. 
 I It impairs all certainty of possession, and taxes none so heavily 
 \ as the class who earn their scant possession by daily labor. It 
 I injures the husbandman by a twofold diminution of the ex- 
 changeable value of his harvest. It is the favorite of those 
 / who seek gain without willingness to toil ; it is the deadly foe 
 / of industry. 'No powerful political party ever permanently 
 / rested for support on the theory that it is wise and right. No 
 \ , statesman has been thought well of by his kind in* a succeeding 
 generation for having been its promoter.* 
 
 In the plan of government, concerted between the members 
 from Connecticut, especially Sherman and Ellsworth, there was 
 this further article : " That the legislatures of the individual 
 states ought not to possess a right to emit bills of credit for a 
 currency, or to make any tender laws for the payment or dis- 
 charge of debts or contracts in any manner different from the 
 agreement of the parties, or in any manner to obstruct or im- 
 pede the recovery of debts, whereby the interests of foreigners 
 or the citizens of any other state may be affected."f 
 
 The committee of detail had reported : " No state, without 
 the consent of the legislature of the United States, shall emit 
 bills of credit. With a nobler and safer trust in the power of 
 truth and right over opinion, Sherman on the twenty-eighth, 
 scorning compromise, cried out : " This is the favorable crisis 
 for crushing paper money," and, joining "Wilson, they two pro- 
 posed to make the prohibition absolute. Gorham feared that 
 
 * This paragraph is a very feeble abstract of the avowed convictions of the 
 great statesmen and jurists who made the constitution. Their words are homely 
 and direct condemnation ; and they come not from one party. Eichard Henry 
 Lee is as strong in his denunciation as Washington, Sherman, or Eobert R. Living- 
 ston. William Paterson of New Jersey wrote in 1786 as follows : " An increase 
 of paper money, especially if it be a tender, will destroy what little credit is left ; 
 will bewilder conscience in the mazes of dishonest speculations ; will allure some 
 and constrain others into the perpetration of knavish tricks ; will turn vice into a 
 legal virtue ; and sanctify iniquity by law," etc. — From the holograph of William 
 Paterson. 
 
 f Sherman's Life, in Biography of the Signers, ii., 43, 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 305 
 
 the absolute prohibition would rouse the most desperate oppo- 
 sition ; but four northern states and four southern states, Mary- 
 land being divided, New Jersey absent, and Virginia alone in 
 the negative, placed in the constitution these unequivocal words : 
 " 1^0 state shall emit bills of credit." The second part of the' 
 clause, " JSTo state shall make anything but gold and silver coin 
 a tender in payment of debts," was accepted without a dissen- 
 tient state. So the adoption of the constitution is to be the end 
 forever of paper money, whetlier issued by the several states 
 or by the United states, if the constitution shall be rightly in- 
 terpreted and honestly obeyed. 
 
 It was ever the wish of Sherman and Ellsworth to prohibit 
 " the discharge of debts or contracts in any manner different 
 from the agreement of the parties." Among the aggressions 
 made by the states on the rights of other states, Madison, in 
 his enumeration,* names the enforced payment of debts in 
 paper money, the enforced discharge of debts by the convey- 
 ance of land or other property, the instalment of debts, and the 
 " occlusion " of courts. For the last two of these wrongs no 
 remedy was as yet provided. 
 
 King moved to add, as in the ordinance of congress for the 
 establishment of new states, " a prohibition on the states to in- 
 terfere in private contracts." f " This would be going too 
 far," interposed Gouverneur Morris. " There are a thousand 
 laws relating to bringing actions, limitations of actions, and 
 the like, which affect contracts. The judicial power of the 
 United States will be a protection in cases within their juris- 
 diction ; mthin the state itself a majority must rule, whatever 
 may be the mischief done among themselves." :[:. " Why, then, 
 prohibit bills of credit?" inquired Sherman. "Wilson was in 
 favor of King's motion. Madison admitted that inconveni- 
 ences might arise from such a prohibition, but thought on the 
 whole its utility would overbalance them. He conceived, how- 
 ever, that a negative on the state laws could alone secure the 
 end. Evasions might and would be devised by the ingenuity 
 of legislatures.* His colleague Mason replied : " The mo- 
 tion " of King " is carrying the restraint too far. Cases will 
 
 * Madison, i., 321. t Ibid, 
 
 f Gilpin, 1443 ; Elliot, 485. * Ibid. 
 
 VOL. TI. — 20 
 
306 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b.iii.; ch.vii. 
 
 happen tliat cannot be foreseen, where some kind of interfer- 
 ence will be proper and essential." He mentioned the case of 
 limiting the period for bringing actions on open account, that 
 of bonds after a lapse of time, asking whether it was proper to 
 tie the hands of the states from making provision in such 
 cases.* 
 
 "The answer to these objections is," Wilson explained, 
 " that retrospective interferences only are to be prohibited." 
 " Is not that already done," asked Madison, " by the prohibi- 
 tion of ex jpost facto laws, which will oblige the judges to de- 
 clare such interferences null and void ? " f But the prohibi. 
 tion which, on the motion of Gerry and McHenry, had been 
 adopted six days before, was a limitation on the powers of con- 
 gress. Instead of King's motion, Rutledge advised to extend 
 that limitation to the individual states ; % and accordingly they, 
 too, were now forbidden to pass bills of attainder or exjpost 
 facto laws by the vote of seven states against Connecticut, 
 Maryland, and Yirginia, Massachusetts being absent. So the 
 motion of King, which had received hearty support only from 
 Wilson, was set aside by a very great majority. 
 
 The next morning " Dickinson mentioned to the house that, 
 on exaraning Blackstone's Commentaries, he found that the 
 term ecu jpost facto related to criminal cases only ; that the 
 words would consequently not restrain the states from retro- 
 spective laws in civil cases ; and that some further provision 
 for this purpose would be requisite." * Of this remark the 
 convention at the moment took no note ; and the clause of 
 Rutledge was left in the draft then making of the constitution, 
 as the provision against the " stay laws and occlusion of courts " 
 so much warned against by Madison, "the payment or dis- 
 charge of debts or contracts in any manner different from the 
 agreement of the parties," as demanded by Sherman and Ells- 
 worth. 1 
 
 * Gilpin, 1443 ; Elliot, 485. \ Gilpin, 1399, 1444 ; Elliot, 462, 485. 
 
 % Ex post facto, not retrospective, was the form used by Rutledge. Correct 
 Gilpin, 1444, by the Journal of the Convention, in Elliot, i., 271, and compare 
 Elliot, i., 257. » Gilpin, 1450 ; Elliot, 488. 
 
 II That no other motion in form or substance was adopted by the convention 
 till after the draft went into the hands of the committee of style and revision, ap- 
 pears from a most careful comparison of the printed journal of the convention, of 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 307 
 
 Among the prohibitions on the states which the committee 
 of detail reported on the twenty-eighth, was that of laying du- 
 ties on imports. "Particular states," observed Mason, "may 
 wish to encom-age by impost duties certain manufactures for 
 which they enjoy natural advantages, as Virginia the manufac- 
 ture of hemp, etc." * Madison rephed : " The encouragement 
 of manufactures in that mode requires duties, not only on im- 
 ports directly from foreign countries, but from the other states 
 in the union, which would revive all the mischiefs experienced 
 from the want of a general government over commerce." f 
 King proposed to extend the prohibition not to imports only, 
 but also to exports, so as to prohibit the states from taxing 
 either. Sherman added, that, even with the consent of the 
 United States, the several states should not levy taxes on im- 
 portations except for the use of the United States. This move- 
 ment Gouverneur Morris supported as a regulation necessary 
 to prevent the Atlantic states from endeavoring to tax the 
 western states and promote their separate interest by opposing 
 the navigation of the Mississippi, which would drive the west- 
 ern people into the arms of Great Britain. George Clymer 
 of Pennsylvania " thought the encouragement of the western 
 country was suicide on the part of the old states. If the states 
 have such different interests that they cannot be left to regu- 
 late their own manufactures, without encountering the interests 
 of other states, it is a proof that they are not fit to compose 
 one nation." X King did not wish to " interfere too much with 
 the policy of states respecting their manufactures," holding 
 that such a policy of protection in a separate state might be 
 necessary. " Pevenue," he reminded the house, " was the ob- 
 ject of the general legislature." * By a large majority the pro- 
 hibition on the several states of taxing imports was made de- 
 pendent on the consent of the legislature of the United States ; 
 
 its Journal as preserved in manuscript, of every scrap of paper containing any mo- 
 tion or sketch of a motion preserved among the records of the convention in the 
 state department, of the debates of the convention as reported by Madison, and of 
 the several copies of the broadside which were used for the entry of amendments 
 by Washington, by Madison, by Brearley, by Gilman, by Johnson, and another, 
 which seems to be that of the secretary, Jackson. 
 
 * Gilpin, 14-i5 ; Elliot, 486. X Gilpin, U46, 14-17 ; Elliot, 487. 
 
 f Ibid. * Gilpin, 1447 ; Elliot, 478. 
 
308 THE FEDERAL CONYENTIOIT. b. m. ; ch. vii. 
 
 and with tliis limitation it was carried witliout a dissentient 
 vote. The extending of the prohibition to exports obtained a 
 majority of but one. That taxes on imports or exports by the 
 states, even with the consent of the United States, should be 
 exclusively for the use of the United States, gained every state 
 but Massachusetts and Maryland. The power to protect do- 
 mestic manufactures by imposts was taken away from the 
 states, and, so far as it is incident to tlie raising of revenue, was 
 confined to the United States. 
 
 The country had been filled with schemes for a division of 
 the thirteen states into two or more separate groups ; the con- 
 vention, following its committee of detail, would suffer no 
 state to enter into any confederation, or even into a treaty or 
 alliance with any confederation. The restriction was absolute. 
 To make it still more clear and peremptory, it was repeated 
 and enlarged in another article, which declared not only that 
 ^' no state shall enter into any agreement or compact with any 
 foreign power," but that " no state shall enter into any agree- 
 ment or compact with any other state." ^' Each state was con- 
 fined in its government strictly to its own duties within itself. 
 
 As to slavery, it was by a unanimous consent treated as a 
 sectional interest; freedom existed in all the states; slavery 
 was a relation established within a state by its own law. Un- 
 der the sovereignty of the king of G-reat Britain the laws of a 
 colony did not on British soil prevail over the imperial law. 
 In like manner in America, a slave in one American colony, 
 finding himself on the soil of another, was subject only to the 
 laws of the colony in which he might be found. It remained 
 so on the declaration of independence ; not as an innovation, 
 but as the continuance of an established fact. The articles of 
 confederation took no note of slavery, except by withholding 
 the privileges of intercitizenship from the slave. The enu- 
 meration of slaves was in the distribution of political power a 
 matter of indifference so long as congress voted by states and 
 proportioned its requisitions of revenue to wealth alone. 
 
 In framing a constitution in which representation in one 
 branch of the legislature was made to depend on population, 
 it became the political interest of the states in which slaves 
 
 * Article xiii. Gilpin, 1239, 1447; Elliot, 381, 48'7. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 309 
 
 abounded to have tliem included in tlie enumeration of the 
 population equally with the free negroes and the whites. They 
 so far succeeded that the slave inhabitants were held to be a 
 part of the grand aggregate of the people of the United States, 
 and as such were entitled to bring a proportional increase of 
 representation to the state in which they abode. For this pur- 
 pose of representation the slaves were by a compromise allowed 
 to be counted, but only as three out of five ; should the master 
 see fit to liberate the slave, he became at once a free inhabitant 
 and a citizen with the right of intercitizenship, and of being 
 counted equally in the representative population. 
 
 Intercitizenship was the life-blood of the union. The re- 
 port of the committee of detail, changing only the words " free 
 inhabitants " for " citizens," followed the articles of confedera- 
 tion in declaring that " the citizens of each state shall be en- 
 titled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several 
 states." * The slave remained a slave, but only in states whose 
 local laws permitted it. 
 
 After three weeks' reflection, Cotesworth Pinckney, on the 
 twenty-eighth of August, avowed himself not satisfied with the 
 article ; he wished that " some provision should be included in 
 favor of property in slaves." The article was nevertheless 
 adopted, but not unanimously ; South Carolina voted against 
 it, and Georgia was divided, showing that discontent with the 
 want of the protection to slavery was seated in their breasts, 
 even so far as to impugn the great principle which was a 
 necessary condition of union.f 
 
 The convention proceeded with its work, and proposed that 
 any person who should flee from justice should be delivered 
 up on the demand of the executive of the state from which he 
 fled. Butler and Charles Pinckney moved, as an amendment, 
 to require fugitive slaves to be delivered up like criminals. 
 " This," answered Wilson, " would oblige the executive of the 
 state to do it at the public expense." " The public," said 
 Sherman, " can with no more propriety seize and surrender a 
 slave or servant than a horse." Butler withdrew his motion 
 and the article as proposed was unanimously adopted. :j: 
 
 * Gilpin, 1240; ElUot, 881. f Gilpin, 1447; Elliot, 487. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1447, 1448; Elliot, 487. 
 
310 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. yii. 
 
 The convention was not unprepared to adopt a fugitive 
 slave law, for such a clause formed a part of the ordinance of 
 1787, adopted in the preceding July for the government of 
 the north-western territory. On the twenty-ninth, Butler, after 
 the opportunity of reflection and consultation, offered a pro- 
 posal : " That the fugitive slaves escaping into another state 
 shall be delivered up to the person justly claiming their ser- 
 vice or labor." This for the moment was agreed to without 
 dissent.* The trouble and expense of making the claim fell 
 on the slave-holder ; the language of the article did not clearly 
 point out by whom the runaway slave was to be delivered up. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1456; Elliot, 492. Compare Gilpin, 1558; Elliot, 564. 
 
1787. THE POWEKS OF CONGRESS. 311 
 
 CHAPTER YIII. 
 
 the constitution in detail. the powees of congkess, 
 continued. 
 
 From the Middle to the End of August 1787. 
 
 On the eighteenth of August, Entledge insisted that it was 
 necessary and expedient for the United States to assume " all 
 the state debts." A committee of eleven, to whom the subject 
 was referred, on the twenty-first reported a grant of power to 
 the United States to assume " the debts of the several states 
 incurred during the late war for the common defence and gen- 
 eral welfare." But the states which had done the most toward 
 discharging their obligations were unwilling to share equally 
 the burdens of those which had done the least ; and the con- 
 vention, adopting on the twenty-fifth the language of Ran- 
 dolph, afiirmed no more than that the engagements of the 
 confederation should be equally valid against the United States 
 under this constitution.* 
 
 The convention, on the seventeenth, agreed with its com- 
 mittee in giving jurisdiction to the United States over the 
 crime of counterfeiting their coins and over crimes committed 
 on tlie high seas, or against the law of nations. f 
 
 The report of the committee of detail gave power to con- 
 gress " to subdue a rebellion in any state on the apphcation of 
 its legislature." Martin, on the seventeenth, approved the 
 limitation to which Charles Pinckney, Gouverneur Morris, and 
 Langdon objected. Ellsworth moved to dispense with the ap- 
 plication of the legislature of the rebellious state when that 
 body could not meet. " Gerry was against letting loose the 
 
 * Gilpin, 1426 ; Elliot, 476. f Gilpin, 1349 ; Elliot, 437. 
 
312 THE FEDERAL CONVENTIOT^. b. hi. ; ch. viii. 
 
 myrmidons of the United States on a state without its own 
 consent. The states will be the best judges in such cases. 
 More blood wonld have been spilt in Massachusetts in the late 
 insurrection if the general authority had intermeddled." The 
 motion of Ellsworth was adopted ; but it weighed down the 
 measure itseK, which obtained only four votes against four.* 
 Z' "We come to a regulation where the spirit of repubhcanism 
 
 ( exercised its humanest influence. The world had been re- 
 'V j tarded in civilization, unpoverished and laid waste by wars of 
 
 / the personal ambition of its kings. The committee of detail 
 4^ y and the convention, in the interest of peace, intrusted the 
 
 ' power to declare war, not to the executive, but to the deliber- 
 
 i ate decision of the two branches of the legislature,! each of 
 them having a negative on the other; and the executive re- 
 
 '- taining his negative on them both. 
 
 On the eighteenth Madison offered a series of propositions, 
 granting powers to dispose of the lands of the United States ; 
 to institute temporary governments for new states ; to regulate 
 affairs with the Indians ; to exercise exclusively legislative au- 
 thority at the seat of general government ; to grant charters of 
 incorporation where the public good might require them and 
 the authority of a single state might be incompetent ; to secure 
 to authors their copyrights for a limited time; to establish a 
 university ; to encourage discoveries and the advancement of 
 useful knowledge. J In that and the next sitting Charles 
 Pinckney proposed, among other cessions, to grant immunities 
 for the promotion of agriculture, commerce, trades, and manu- 
 factures. They were all unanimously referred to the commit- 
 tee of detail. 
 
 Gerry would have an army of two or three thousand * at 
 the most ; a number in proportion to population greater than 
 the present army of the United States. The power to raise 
 and support armies was, however, accepted unanimously, with 
 no " fetter on " it, except the suggestion then made by Mason 
 and soon formally adopted, that "no appropriation for that 
 use should be for a longer term than two years." 
 
 * Gilpin, 1350, 1351 ; Elliot, 437, 438. # Gilpin, 1360 ; Elliot, 443. 
 
 \ Gilpin, 1351 ; Elliot, 488. Elliot, i., 247. 
 i Gilpin, 1353, 1354, 1355; Elliot, 439, 440. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 313 
 
 The idea of a navy was welcome to the country. Jefferson 
 thought a small one a necessity.* The convention accepted 
 unanimously the clause giving power "to build and equip 
 fleets ; " or, as the power was more fitly defined, " to provide 
 and maintain a navy." f 
 
 The report gave to the general government only power to 
 call forth the aid of the militia. J Mason moved to grant the 
 further power of its regulation and discipKne, for "thirteen 
 states would never concur in any one system " ; * but he re- 
 served " to the states the appointment of the officers." In the 
 opinion of Ellsworth, the motion went too far. " The militia 
 should be under rules established by the general government 
 when in actual service of the United States. The whole au- 
 thority over it ought by no means to be taken from the states. 
 Their consequence would pine away to nothing after such a 
 sacrifice of power. The general authority could not suffi- 
 ciently pervade the union for the purpose, nor accommodate 
 itseK to the local genius of the people." Sherman supported 
 him. " My opinion is," said Dickinson, " that the states never 
 ought to give up all authority over the militia, and never 
 will." 1 
 
 Swayed by Dickinson, Mason modified his original motion, 
 which Cotesworth Pinckney instantly renewed. A grand 
 committee of eleven, to which this among other subjects was 
 referred, on the twenty-first reported''^ that the legislature 
 should have power " to make laws for organizing, arming, and 
 disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them 
 as may be employed in the service of the United States." 
 Ellsworth and Sherman, on the twenty-third, accepted the lat- 
 ter part of the clause, but resisted the former. " The disci- 
 pline of the militia," answered Madison, "is evidently a na- 
 tional concern, and ought to be provided for in the national 
 constitution." And the clause was adopted by nine states 
 against Connecticut and Maryland. {) 
 
 * Notes on Virginia, end of the answer to query 22 ; Jefferson, i., 592, 606 ; 
 ii., 211, 218; Madison, i., 196. » Gilpin, 1355 ; Elliot, 440. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1360; Elliot, 443. || Gilpin, 1361, 1362; Elliot, 443, 444. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1233 ; Elliot, 379. ^ Gilpin, 1378 ; Elliot, 451. 
 
 Gilpin, 1406, 1407 ; Elliot, 466. 
 
314 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION b. hi. ; ch. viii. 
 
 Madison always wished to reserve to the United States the 
 appointment of general officers in the militia. This Sherman 
 pronounced absolutely inadmissible. "As the states are not 
 to be abolished," said Gerry, "I w^onder at the attempts to 
 give powers inconsistent with their existence. A civil war 
 may be produced by the conflict between people who will sup- 
 port a plan of vigorous government at every risk and others of 
 a more democratic cast." " The greatest danger," said Madi- 
 son, " is disunion of the states ; it is necessary to guard against 
 it by sufficient powers to the common government ; the great- 
 est danger to liberty is from large standing armies ; it is best 
 to prevent them by an effectual provision for a good militia." 
 Madison gained for his motion only N'ew Hampshire, South 
 Carolina, and Georgia. The appointment of officers by the 
 states was then agreed to ; and the states were to train tlie mi- 
 litia, but according to the discipline prescribed by the United 
 States.* 
 
 The power " to make all laws necessary and proper for car- 
 rying into execution the powers vested by this constitution in 
 the government of the United States, or in any department or 
 office thereof," was so clearly necessary that, without cavil or 
 remark, it was unanimously agreed to.f 
 
 The definition of treason against the United States, though 
 made in language like that of the English law, took notice of 
 the federal character of the American government by defining 
 it as levying war against the United States or any one of 
 them ; thus reserving to the United States the power to punish 
 treason, whether by war against the United States or by war 
 against a state. Johnson was of opinion that there could be no 
 treason against a particular state even under the confederation, 
 much less under the proposed system. Mason answered: 
 " The United States will have a qualified sovereignty only ; 
 the individual states will retain a part of the sovereignty." 
 "A rebellion in a state," said Johnson, "would amount to 
 treason against the supreme sovereign, the United States." 
 " Treason against a state," said King, " must be treason against 
 the United States." Sherman difl:ered from him, saying: 
 " Kesistance against the laws of the United States is distin- 
 
 * Gilpin, 1407, 1408 ; Elliot, 466, 467. f Gilpin, 1370; Elliot, 447. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 315 
 
 guished from resistance against the laws of a particular state." 
 Ellsworth added : " The United States are sovereign on one 
 side of the line dividing the jurisdictions, the states on the 
 other. Each ought to have power to defend their respective 
 sovereignties." ^ " War or insurrection against a member of 
 the union," said Dickinson, "must be so against the whole 
 body." The clause as amended, evading the question, spoke 
 only of treason by levying war against the United States or 
 adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. No 
 note was taken of the falsification of election returns, or the 
 dangers peculiar to elective governments. Martin relates that 
 he wished an amendment excepting citizens of any state from 
 the penalty of treason, when they acted expressly in obedience 
 to the authority of their own state ; but seeing that a motion 
 to that effect would meet with no favor, he at the time shut 
 up the thought within his own breast.f 
 
 The members of the convention long held in " recollection 
 the pain and difficulty which the subject of slavery caused in 
 that body," and which " had well-nigh led southern states to 
 break it up without coming to any determination." ^ The 
 members from South Carolina and Georgia were moved by the 
 extreme desire of preserving the union and obtaining an effi- 
 cient government ; but as their constituents could not be rec- 
 onciled to the immediate prohibition of the slave-trade by the 
 act of the United States, they demanded that their states 
 should retain on that subject the liberty of choice which all 
 then possessed under the confederation. Unwilling to break 
 the imion into fragments, the committee of detail proposed 
 limitations of the power of congress to regulate commerce. No 
 tax might be laid on exports, nor on the importation of slaves. 
 As to the slave-trade, each state was to remain, as under the 
 articles of confederation, free to import such persons as it 
 "should think proper to admit." The states might, one by 
 
 * Gilpin, 1375; Elliot, 450. 
 
 f Elliot, i., 382, 383. I think Martin did not make the motion, as it is found 
 neither in the journal nor in Madison. His narrative is, perhaps, equivocal. His 
 words are: "I wished to have obtained"; and again: "But this provision was 
 not adopted." Here is no assertion that he made the motion. 
 
 :J: Baldwin's Speech in the House, 12 February 1*790. 
 
316 THE FEDERAL CONVENTIO>T. b. iii. ; on. viii. 
 
 one, eatih for itself, prohibit the slave-trade ; not the United 
 States by a general law. This decision was coupled with no 
 demand of privileges for the shipping interest. Ellsworth, in 
 the committee, had consented, unconditionally, that no naA^iga- 
 tion act should be passed without the assent of two thirds of 
 the members present in each house. 
 
 On the twenty-first the prohibition to tax exports was car- 
 ried by Massachusetts and Connecticut with the five most 
 southern states. Thus absolute free trade as to exports became 
 a part of the fundamental law of the United States. The vote 
 of Virginia was due to Mason, Eandolph, and Blair ; "Washing- 
 ton and Madison were always unwilling to seem to favor a 
 local interest, especially a southern one, and were ready to 
 trust the subject to the general government.* 
 
 fFrom Maryland came a voice against the slave-trade. For 
 three reasons Martin proposed to prohibit or to tax the impor- 
 tation of slaves : " The importation of slaves affects the ap- 
 portionment of representation, weakens one part of the union 
 which the other parts are bound to protect, and dishonors the 
 principles of the revolution and the American character." 
 
 Kutledge answered : " Religion and humanity have nothing 
 to do with this question ; interest alone is the governing prin- 
 ciple with nations. The true question at present is, whether 
 the southern states shall or shall not be parties to the union ? 
 If the northern states consult their interest they w^ill not oppose 
 the increase of slaves, which -^dll increase the commodities, of 
 w^hich they will become the carriers." Ellsworth, speaking 
 consistently with the respect which he had always shown for 
 the rights of the states, answered : " I am for leaving the clause 
 as it stands. Let every state import what it pleases. The 
 morality or wisdom of slavery are considerations belonging to 
 the states themselves. The old confederation did not meddle 
 with this point ; and I do not see any greater necessity for 
 bringing it within the policy of the new one." " South Caro- 
 lina," said Charles Pinckney, " can never receive the plan if it 
 . prohibits the slave-trade." 
 
 The debate was continued through the next day. Sherman 
 was perplexed between his belief in the inherent right of man 
 
 * Gilpin, 1388; Elliot, 456. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF C0:N"GRESS. 317 
 
 to freedom and the tenet of the right of each state to settle 
 for itself its internal affairs, and said : " I disapprove of the 
 slave-trade ; yet, as the states are now possessed of the right 
 to import slaves, and as it is expedient to have as few objec- 
 tions as possible to the proposed scheme of government, I 
 think it best to leave the matter as we find it." 
 
 Mason, compressing the observation of a long life into a 
 few bm-ning words, replied : " This infernal trafiic originated 
 in the avarice of British merchants ; the British government 
 constantly checked the attempts of Yirginia to put a stop to 
 it. The present question concerns not the importing states 
 alone, but the whole union. Maryland and Yirginia have al- 
 ready prohibited tlie importation of slaves expressly; North 
 Carohna has done the same in substance. All this would be 
 in vain if South Carolina and Georgia be at liberty to import 
 them. The western people are already calling out for slaves 
 for their new lands, and will fill that country with slaves if 
 they can be got through South Carolina and Georgia. Slavery 
 discourages arts and manufactures. The poor despise labor 
 when performed by slaves. They prevent the emigration of 
 whites, who really enrich and strengthen a country. They 
 produce the most pernicious effect on manners. Every master 
 of slaves is born a petty tyrant. They bring the judgment of 
 heaven on a country. As nations cannot be rewarded or pun- 
 ished in the next world, they must be in this. By an inevi- 
 table chain of causes and effects, Providence punishes national 
 sins by national calamities. I lament that some of our eastern 
 brethren have, from a lust of gain, embarked in this nefarious 
 traffic. As to the states being in possession of the right to 
 import, this is the case with many other rights, now to be prop- 
 erly given up. I hold it essential in every point of view, that 
 the general government should have power to prevent the in- 
 crease of slavery." Mason spoke from his inmost soul, anxious 
 for freedom and right, for the happiness of his country and the 
 welfare of mankind. 
 
 To words of such intense sincerity Ellsworth answered with 
 almost mocking irony : " As I have never owned a slave I can- 
 not judge of the effects of slavery on character. If, however, 
 it is to be considered in a moral light, we ought to go further 
 
318 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. m. ; ch. viii. 
 
 and free the slaves already in the country. Besides, slaves 
 multiply so fast in Yirginia and Maryland that it is cheaper 
 to raise than import them, whilst in the sickly rice-swamps 
 foreign supplies are necessary ; if we go no further than is 
 urged, we shall be unjust toward South Carolina and Georgia. 
 Let us not intermeddle. As population increases, poor labor- 
 ers will be so plenty as to render slaves useless. Slavery, in 
 time, will not be a speck in our country. Provision is made 
 in Connecticut for abolishing it ; and the abolition has already 
 taken place in Massachusetts." 
 
 " If the southern states are let alone," said Charles Pinck- 
 ney, " they will probably of themselves stop importations. I 
 would myself, as a citizen of South Carolina, vote for it." 
 
 In the same vein Cotesworth Pinckney remarked : " If I 
 and all my colleagues were to sign the constitution and use our 
 personal influence, it would be of no avail toward obtaining 
 the assent of our constituents. South Carolina and Georgia 
 cannot do without slaves. Virginia will gain by stopping the 
 importations. Her slaves will rise in value, and she has more 
 than she wants. It would be unequal to require South Caro- 
 lina and Georgia to confederate on such terms. Slaves should 
 be dutied like other imports ; but a rejection of the clause is 
 the exclusion of South Carolina from the union." Baldwin, 
 with opinions on the rights of the states like those of Ells- 
 worth and Sherman, continued : " The object before the con- 
 vention is not national, but local. Georgia cannot purchase 
 the advantage of a general government by yielding the abridg- 
 ment of one of her favorite prerogatives. If left to herself, 
 she may probably put a stop to the evil." 
 
 " If South Carolina and Georgia," observed Wilson, " are 
 themselves disposed to get rid of the importation of slaves in a 
 short time, they will never refuse to unite because the impor- 
 tation might be prohibited." To this Cotesworth Pinckney 
 made answer: "I think myseH bound to declare candidly 
 that I do not believe South Carolina will stop her importa- 
 tions of slaves in any short time, except occasionally as she 
 now does." 
 
 " On every principle of honor and safety," said Dickinson, 
 " it is inadmissible that the importation of slaves should be 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 319 
 
 authorized to the states by the constitation. The true ques-" 
 tion is whether the national happiness will be promoted or 
 impeded by the importation ; and this question ought to be 
 left to the national government, not to the states particularly 
 interested. I cannot believe that the southern states will refuse 
 to confederate on that account, as the power is not likely to be 
 immediately exorcised by the general government." Here was 
 the opening to a grant of the power, coupled with a prospect ' 
 of delay in using it. 
 
 Williamson, himself no friend of slavery, distinctly inti- 
 mated that North Carolina would go with her two neighbors 
 on the south. Cotesworth Pinckney now moved to commit 
 the clause, that slaves might be made liable to an equal tax 
 with other imports. " If the convention," said Rutledge, 
 " thinks that North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia will 
 ever agree to the plan, unless their right to import slaves be 
 untouched, the expectation is vain ; " and he seconded the mo- 
 tion for a commitment. Gouvemeur Morris wished the whole 
 subject to be committed, including the clauses relating to 
 taxes on exports and to a navigation act. These things might 
 form a bargain among the northern and southern states. 
 "Eather than to part with the southern states," said Sherman, 
 " it is better to let them import slaves. But a tax on slaves 
 imported makes the matter worse, because it implies they are 
 property." 
 
 " Two states," said Randolph, " may be lost to the union ; 
 let us, then, try the chance of a commitment." The motion 
 for commitment was adopted by the votes of Connecticut, New 
 Jersey, and the five southernmost states, against New Hamp- 
 shire, Pennsylvania, and Delaware; Massachusetts was ab- 
 sent. 
 
 Charles Pinckney and Langdon then moved to commit the 
 section relating to a navigation act. " I desire it to be remem- 
 bered," said Gorham, remotely hinting at possible secession, 
 " the eastern states have no motive to union but a commercial 
 one." Ellsworth, maintaining the position which he had de- 
 liberately chosen, answered : " I am for taking the plan as it is. 
 If we do not agree on this middle and moderate ground, I am 
 afraid we shaU lose two states with others that may stand aloof ; 
 
320 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. viii. 
 
 and fly, most probably, into several confederations, not without 
 bloodshed." * 
 
 Had the convention listened to no compromise on the 
 slave-trade, Georgia and South Carolina would not have ac- 
 cepted the new constitution ; IS^orth Carolina would have clung 
 to them, from its internal condition ; Virginia, however earnest 
 might have been the protest against it by Madison and Wash- 
 ington, must have acted with J^orth CaroHna, and, as a conse- 
 quence, there would from the beginning have been a federa- 
 tion of slave-holding states. The committee to which the 
 whole subject of restriction on the power over commerce was 
 referred consisted of Langdon, King, Johnson, the aged Will- 
 iam Livingston of New Jersey, Clymer, Dickinson, Martin, 
 Madison, Williamson, Cotesworth Pinckney, and Baldwin,f a 
 large majority of them venerable for uprightness and ability. 
 Their report, made on the twenty-fourth, denied to the United 
 States the power to prohibit the slave-trade prior to the year 
 1800, but granted the power to impose a tax or duty on sucli 
 migration or importation at a rate not exceeding the average 
 of the duties laid on imports, f 
 
 On the twenty-fifth, when the report of the committee of 
 eleven was taken up, Cotesworth Pinckney immediately moved 
 to extend the time allowed for the importation of slaves till 
 the year 1808. Gorham was his second. Madison spoke ear- 
 nestly against the prolongation ; * but, without further debate, 
 the motion prevailed by the votes of the three New England 
 states, Maryland, and the three southernmost states, against 
 New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Virginia. || 
 
 Sherman once more resisted the duty " as acknowledging 
 men to be property " by taxing them as such under the char- 
 acter of slaves ; and Madison supported him, saying : " I think 
 it wrong to admit in the constitution the idea that there can 
 be property in men." ^ But, as the impost which had been 
 proposed on all imported articles was of five per cent and the 
 slave was deemed to have an average value of two hundred 
 dollars, the rate was fixed definitively at ten dollars on every 
 
 * Gilpin, 1388-1396 ; Elliot, 4&6-461. # Gilpin, 1427 ; Elliot, 477. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1397; Elliot, 461. | Gilpin, 1429; Elliot, 478. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1415 ; Elliot, 471. ^ Gilpin, 1429, 1430 ; Elliot, 473. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 321 
 
 imported slave, and tlie clause tlius amended was unanimously 
 held fast as a discouragement of the traffic. 
 
 " It ought to be considered," wrote Madison near the time, 
 " as a great point gained in favor of humanity, that a period of 
 twenty years may terminate forever within these states a traffic 
 which has so long and so loudly upbraided the barbarism of 
 modern poHcy. Happy would it be for the unfortunate Afri- 
 cans if an equal prospect lay before them of being redeemed 
 from the oppressions of their European brethren ! " * 
 
 The confederation granted no power to interfere with the 
 slave-trade. The new constitution gave power to prohibit it in 
 new states immediately on their admission, in existing states at 
 the end of the year 1807. Louisiana, by annexation to the 
 union, lost the license to receive slaves from abroad. On the 
 second day of December 1806, Thomas Jefferson, president of 
 the United States of America, addressed this message to con- 
 gress : f " I congratulate you, fellow-citizens, on the approach 
 of the period at which you may interpose your authority con- 
 stitutionally to withdraw the citizens of the United States from 
 all further participation in those violations of human rights 
 which have been so long continued on the unoffending inhabit- 
 ants of Africa, and which the morality, the reputation, and the 
 best interests of our country have long been eager to pro- 
 scribe." 
 
 Unanimous legislation followed the words from the presi- 
 dent, and, as th e^year ISO ^Jbr oke upon the United States , th e 
 inv portnti o n of slaves had censerl . And did slavery have as 
 peaceful an end ? Philanthropy, like genius and like science, 
 must bide its time. Man cannot hurry the supreme power, 
 to which years are as days. 
 
 Two members of the convention, with the sincere integrity 
 which clears the eye for prophetic vision, read the doom of 
 slave-holding. Mason, fourteen years before, in a paper pre- 
 pared for the legislature of Virginia, had given his opinion 
 that as the natural remedy for political injustice the constitu- 
 tion should by degrees work itself clear by its own innate/ 
 strength, the virtue and resolution of the community; andl 
 added : " The laws of impartial Providence may avenge upon ] 
 
 * The Federalist, No. xlii. f Journals of Congress, v., 468. 
 
 TOL. VI. — 21 
 
322 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; ch. viii. 
 
 our posterity the injury done to a set of wretclies whom our 
 injustice hath debased almost to a level with the brute creation. 
 These remarks were extorted by a kind of irresistible, perhaps 
 an enthusiastic, impulse ; and the author of them, conscious of 
 his own good intentions, cares not whom they please or of- 
 fend." * 
 
 During a previous debate on tlie value of slaves. Mason 
 had observed of them that they might in cases of emergency 
 themselves become soldiers.f On the twenty-second of Au- 
 gust J he called to mind that Cromwell, when he sent commis- 
 sioners to Virginia to take possession of the country, gave them 
 power to arm servants and slaves. He further pointed out 
 that the British might have prevailed in the South in the war 
 of the revolution had they known how to make use of the 
 slaves ; that in Virginia the royal governor invited them to 
 rise at a time wlien he was not in possession of the country, 
 and, as the slaves were incapable of self -organization and direc- 
 tion, his experiments by proclamation, addressed to them in 
 regions not within his sway, totally failed ; but that in South 
 Carolina, where the British were in the full possession of the 
 country, they might have enfranchised the slaves and enrolled 
 them for the consoUdation and establishment of the royal au- 
 /( thority. But the civil and military officers in those days of 
 a/ y abject corruption chose rather to enrich themselves by ship- 
 I ping the slaves to the markets of the West Indies. Five 
 
 )lnonths later Madison, in a paper addressed to the country, re- 
 marked : " An unliappy species of population abounds in some 
 of the states who, during the calm of the regular government, 
 are sunk below the level of men ; but who, in the tempestuous 
 scenes of civil violence, may emerge into the human character, 
 and give a superiority of strength to any party with which 
 they may associate themselves."* Slave-holding was to be 
 borne down on the field of battle. 
 
 The dignity and interests of the United States alike de- 
 
 * George Mason's extracts from the Virginia charters, with some remarks on 
 them, made in the year 1773. MS. The paper, though communicated to the 
 legislature of Virginia, has not been found in its archives. My copy, which is, 
 perhaps, the only one now in existence, I owe to the late James M. Mason. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1068 ; Elliot, 296. t Gilpin, 1390 ; Elliot, 458. 
 
 * Madison in the Federalist, No. xliii., published 25 January 1788. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. 323 
 
 manded a grant of power to tlie general government for tlie 
 regulation of foreign as well as domestic trade. "Without it the 
 navigation of the country would have been at the mercy of 
 foreign restrictions. For this regulation the new constitution 
 required, as in all other acts of legislation, no more than a ma- 
 jority of the two houses of congress. A strong opposition 
 started up in the South under the lead of Charles Pinckney 
 and Martin, inflamed by Mason and by Randolph ; but it was 
 in vain. On the twenty-ninth, Madison, Spaight, and Rutledge 
 defended the report of the eleven like statesmen, free from local 
 influences or prejudice. It was clearly stated that the ships of^ 
 nations in treaty with the United States would share in their / 
 carrying trade ; that a rise in freight could be but temporary, I 
 because it would be attended by an increase of southern as well / . / 
 as of northern shipping ; that the West India trade was a great / 
 object to be obtained only through the pressure of a navigation 
 act. Cotesworth Pinckney owned that he had been prejudiced^ 
 against the eastern states, but had found their delegates as 
 liberal and as candid as any men whatever. On the question, 
 Delaware and South Carolina joined the united IN'orth against 
 Maryland, Virginia, ]N"orth Carolina, and Georgia. After this"^ 
 vote the convention accepted unanimously the proposition I 
 to grant to the majority in the two branches of congress full \ 
 power to make laws regulating commerce and navigation. ( 
 Randolph was so much dissatisfied that he expressed a " doubt I 
 whether he should be able to agree to the constitution." Mason, j 
 more deeply in earnest, as yet held his emotions in check. 
 
 Of new states, the Virginia plan knew those only '' lawfully 
 arising within the limits of the United States," and for their 
 admission vaguely required less than a unanimous vote ; the 
 committee of detail demanded the consent of two thirds of each 
 house of congress, as well as the concurrence of the states with- 
 in whose " limits " the new states should arise. 
 
 At this stage Gouverneur Morris enlarged the scope and sim- 
 plified the language of the article. The confederation had 
 opened the door to Canada at its own choice alone, and to any 
 other territory that could obtain the consent of two thirds of con- 
 gress. It was no longer decent to hold out to Canada an invi- 
 tation to annex itseK to the union ; but the American mind, in 
 
324: THE FEDEKAL CONYENTIOK b. iii. ; en. viii. 
 
 the strength of independence, foresaw its expansion. The 
 rising states beyond the mountains were clamorons for the un- 
 obstructed navigation of the Mississippi, which might lead to 
 the acquisition by treaty of all the land east of that river; 
 and the boundary on the south, as well of Georgia as of 
 Florida, had never been adjusted with Spain. Gouverneur 
 'Morris had at an early day desired to restrict the limits of the 
 United States ; he now gave his ancient fears to the winds, and, 
 acceding in advance to the largest eventual annexations, he 
 proposed these few and simple words : " JN'ew States may be 
 admitted by the legislature into the union/' with the full un- 
 derstanding and intention that an ordinary act of legislation 
 should be sufficient by a bare majority to introduce foreign 
 territory as a state into the union.^ This clause the convention 
 accepted without a debate, and without a division. 
 
 On the thirtieth, Maryland, impelled by a desire to guard 
 the right of the United States to the back lands, and to be the 
 champion of Kentucky, of Maine, of Vermont, and of the 
 settlements on the Tennessee river and its branches, would 
 have granted to the legislature of the United States unlimited 
 power to dismember old states, but was supported only by 
 Delaware and New Jersey. Vermont might once have been 
 included within " the limits " of New York, but certainly re- 
 mained no longer within its jurisdiction. By changing the 
 word "limits" to "jurisdiction," the convention, still follow- 
 ing Gouverneur Morris, provided for its future admission to 
 the union without the consent of New York. In regard to the 
 south-western settlements, the preliminary consent of the states 
 of which they then formed a part was not dispensed with. In 
 like manner no state could be formed by the junction of two 
 or more states or parts thereof without the concurrence of such 
 states. The country north-west of the Ohio having already 
 been provided for, the rule for the admission of new states was 
 thus completed for every part of the territory of the states or 
 of the United States. The convention, still using the language 
 of Gouverneur Morris, and no one but Maryland dissenting, 
 assigned to the legislature the power to dispose of and make 
 
 * Gilpin, 1458 ; Elliot, 493. Life and Writings of GouTerneur Morris by 
 Sparks, iii., 183, 185, 290. Cooley's Story, 1282, etc. 
 
1787. THE POWERS OF COJS^GPwESS. 325 
 
 all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or 
 other property belonging to the United States. 
 
 Every word in the constitution bearing on the subject of 
 slavery was chosen with the greatest caution ; every agreement 
 was jealously guarded. After the section relating to the slave- 
 trade, the committee of detail inserted : " No capitation tax 
 shall be laid unless in proportion to the census hereinbefore 
 directed to be taken." * This was intended to prevent con- 
 gress from enforcing a general emancipation by the special 
 taxation of slaves.f 
 
 * Gilpin, 1234, 1415 ; Elliot, 379, 471, 
 
 f Speech of Baldwin in the house of representatives, 12 February 1790. 
 
326 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; ch. ix. 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 the president. 
 July, August, and September 1787. 
 
 How to call fortli one of the people to be their executive 
 chief for a limited period of years, and how to clothe him with 
 just sufficient powers, long baffled the convention. Federal 
 governments, in G-reece, in Switzerland, and in Holland, like 
 the confederation of the United States, had been without a 
 separate executive branch ; and the elective monarchies of Po- 
 land, of the Papal states, and of Germany, offered no available 
 precedents. The report of the committee of detail of the sixth 
 of August introduced no improvement in the manner of select- 
 ing a president ; and it transferred to the senate the power to 
 make treaties and to appoint ambassadors and judges of the 
 supreme court.* Questions relating to his duties long remained 
 in doubt ; the mode of his election was reached only just be- 
 fore the close of the convention. 
 
 The Virginia plan confided the choice of the executive to 
 the national legislature. " An election by the national legisla- 
 ture," objected Gouverneur Morris, on the seventeenth of 
 July, " will be the work of intrigue, of cabal, of corruption, 
 and of faction ; it will be like the election of a pope by a con- 
 clave of cardinals ; of a king by the diet of Poland ; real merit 
 will rarely be the title to the appointment." He moved for 
 an election by the " citizens of the United States." f Sherman 
 preferred a choice by the national legislature. Wilson insisted 
 on an election by the people ; should no one have a majority, 
 then, and then only, the legislature might decide between the 
 
 * Gilpin, 1234 ; Elliot, 379. f Gilpin, 1120; Elliot, 322. 
 
1787. THE PRESIDENT. 327 
 
 candidates.^ Charles Pinckney opposed the election by the 
 people, because it would surrender the choice to a combination 
 of the populous states led by a few designing men.f " To refer 
 the choice of a proper character for a chief magistrate to the 
 people," protested Mason, " would be as unnatural as to refer a 
 trial of colors to a blind man." J " An election by the people," 
 observed "Williamson, "is an appointment by lot." On the 
 first vote Pennsylvania stood alone against nine states. Martin 
 proposed to intrust the appointment to the legislatures of the 
 states ; and was supported only by Delaware and Maryland. 
 
 On the mode of choosing the president, the length of his 
 period of office and his re-eligibility would be made to depend. 
 The convention, in committee, had fixed that period at seven 
 years with a prohibition of re-election. On the motion of 
 "William Houston of Georgia, supported by Sherman and 
 Gouverneur Morris, this compulsory rotation was struck 
 out by six states, against Delaware, Virginia, and the two 
 Carolinas. The executive becoming re-eligible, Jacob Broom 
 of Delaware revived the idea of a shorter period of service. 
 McClurg held that the independence of the executive was no 
 less essential than the independence of the judiciary ; that a 
 president, elected for a small number of years by the national 
 legislature, and looking to that body for re-election, would be 
 its dependent. To escape from corrupt cabals and yet preserve 
 a good officer in place, he moved that the tenure of office should 
 be good behavior. Gouverneur Morris beamed with. joy. 
 Broom found all his difficulties obviated. " Such a tenure," 
 interposed Sherman, " is neither safe nor admissible ; re-elec- 
 tion will depend on good behavior." * 
 
 Madison, who to the last refused with unabated vigor to in- 
 trust the choice of the national executive to the national legis- 
 lature, and at heart would not have been greatly disinclined 
 to the longest period of service for the executive if " an easy 
 and effectual removal by impeachment could have been set- 
 tled," II argued from the necessity of keeping the executive, 
 legislative, and judiciary powers independent of each other, 
 
 * Gilpin, 1121 ; Elliot, 323. X Gilpin, 1123; Elliot, 324. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1121 ; Elliot, 323. # Gilpin, 1125, 1126; Elliot, 325. 
 
 11 Madison's Writings, i, 345 ; Gilpin, 1127; Elliot, 326. 
 
328 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. iii. ; oh. ix. 
 
 tliat the tenure of good behavior for the executive was a less 
 evil than its dependence on the national legislature for re- 
 election. 
 
 Mason replied: "An executive during good behavior is 
 only a softer name for an executive for life ; the next easy- 
 step will be to hereditary monarchy. Should the motion suc- 
 ceed, I may myself live to see such a revolution." " To pre- 
 vent the introduction of monarchy," rejoined Madison, "is, 
 with me, the real object. Experience proves a tendency in our 
 governments to throw all power into the legislative vortex. 
 The executives of the states are in general little more than 
 ciphers ; the legislatures omnipotent. If no effectual check be 
 devised on the encroachments of the latter, a revolution will 
 be inevitable." After explanations by McClurg, four states — 
 'New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Virginia, Madison 
 voting with McClurg — expressed their preference for the ten- 
 ure of good behavior to the tenure of seven years with a per- 
 petual re-eligibility by the national legislature.* Massachu- 
 setts was among the six states in the negative, though to King, 
 who "relied on the vigor of the executive as a great security 
 for the public liberties," the tenure of good behavior would 
 have been most agreeable, " provided an independent and ef- 
 fectual forum could be devised for the trial of the executive on 
 an impeachment." f 
 
 This discussion brought the convention unanimously if to 
 the opinion that if the executive was to be chosen by the na- 
 tional legislature, he ought not to be re-eligible. Those, there- 
 fore, who agreed with Sherman, that the statesman who had 
 proved himself most fit for an office ought not to be excluded 
 by the constitution from holding it, were bound to devise some 
 other acceptable mode of election. 
 
 The first thought was an immediate choice by the people. 
 But here Madison pointed out that " the right of suffrage was 
 much more diffusive in the northern states than in the south- 
 ern ; and that the latter would have no influence in the election 
 on the score of the negroes." * To meet this difficulty. King 
 revived Wilson's proposition for the appointment of the ex- 
 
 * Gilpin, 1127, 1128, 1129 ; Elliot, 326, 327. t Gilpin, 1147; Elliot, 337. 
 f Gilpin, 1157 ; Elliot, 342. » Gilpin, 1148 ; Elliot, 337. 
 
1787. THE PRESIDENT. 329 
 
 ecntive by electors cliosen by the people expressly for the pur- 
 pose ; * and Madison promptly accepted it as, " on the whole, 
 liable to fewest objections." f So, too, in part, thought the 
 convention, which, on the motion of Ellsworth, decided, by six 
 states to three, that the national executive should be appointed 
 by electors ; and, by eight states to two, that the electors should 
 be chosen by the state legislatures. J From confidence in the 
 purity of the electoral body thus established, the re-eligibility 
 of the executive was again affirmed by a vote of eight states 
 against the two Carolinas ; * and, in consequence of the re-eli- 
 gibility, the term of office was, at Ellsworth's motion, reduced 
 by the vote of all the states but Delaware from seven years to 
 six. II So the convention hoped to escape from the danger of 
 a corrupt traffic between the national legislature and candidates 
 for the executive by assembling in one place one grand elec- 
 toral college, chosen by the legislatures of the several states for 
 the sole purpose of electing that officer. 
 
 To this system Caleb Strong of Massachusetts started this 
 grave objection : " A new set of men, like the electors, will 
 make the government too complex ; nor will the first charac- 
 ters in the state feel sufficient motives to undertake the office." "^ 
 On the previous day Houston of Georgia had directed the 
 thoughts of the convention " to the expense and extreme in- 
 convenience of drawing together men from all the states for 
 the single purpose of electing the chief magistrate." () To him, 
 likewise, it now seemed improbable that capable men would 
 undertake the service. He was afraid to trust to it. Moved 
 by these considerations, but still retaining its conviction of the 
 greater purity of an electoral college, the convention, by seven 
 votes against four, in the weariness of vacillation, returned to 
 the plan of electing the national executive by the national legis- 
 lature. J But the vote was sure to reopen the question of 
 his re-eligibility. 
 
 The convention was now like a pack of hounds in full chase, 
 suddenly losing the trail. It fell into an anarchy of opinion, 
 
 * Gilpin, 1147; Elliot, 336. | Gilpin, llRl, 1152; Elliot, 389. 
 f Gilpin, 1148 ; Elliot, 337. ^ Gilpin, 1189 ; Elliot, 358. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1150; Elliot, 338. Gilpin, 1186; Elliot, 357. 
 
 # Gilpin, 1150, 1151 ; Elliot, 338. i Gilpin, 1190 ; Elliot, 359. 
 
330 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; ch. ix. 
 
 and one crude sclieme trod on the heels of another. "William- 
 son, pleading the essential difference of interests between the 
 northern and southern states, particularly relating to the carry- 
 ing trade, " wished the executive power to be lodged in three 
 men, taken from three districts, into which the states should 
 be divided."* "At some time or other," said he, "we shall 
 have a king ; to postpone the event as long as possible, I would 
 render the executive ineligible." f 
 
 In the event of the ineligibility of the executive, Martin, 
 forgetting the state of anarchy and faction that would attend a 
 long period of service by an incompetent or unworthy incum- 
 bent, proposed that the term of executive service should be 
 eleven years. J " From ten to twelve," said Williamson.* 
 " Fifteen," said Gerry ; and King mocked them all by propos- 
 ing " twenty years, the medium life of princes." || Wilson, 
 seeing no way of introducing a direct election by the people, 
 made the motion^ that the executive should be chosen by 
 electors to be taken from the national legislature by lot. 
 
 Ellsworth, on the twenty-fifth, pointed out that to secure 
 a candidate for re-election against an improper dependence 
 on the legislature, the choice should be made by electors.^ 
 Madison Hked best an election of the executive by the quali- 
 fied part of the people at large. "Local considerations," he 
 said, "must give way to the general interest. As an indi- 
 vidual from the southern states, I am willing to make the 
 sacrifice." J 
 
 And now came into consideration an element which exer- 
 cised a constant bias on the discussion to the last. Ellsworth 
 complained that the executive would invariably be taken from 
 one of the larger states. "To cure the disadvantage under 
 which an election by the people would place the smaller states," 
 Williamson proposed that each man should vote for three can- 
 didates. ^ Gouverneur Morris accepted the principle, but de- 
 sired to limit the choice of the voters to two, of whom at least 
 
 * Gilpin, 1180; Elliot, 353. f Gilpin, 1191 ; Elliot, 360. 
 f Gilpin, 1189, 1190 ; Elliot, 359. ^ Gilpin, 1196 ; Elliot, 362. 
 i Gilpin, 1191 ; Elliot, 360. ^ Gilpin, 1198 ; Elliot, 363. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1190; Elliot, 359. ^ Gilpin, 1201; Elliot, 365. 
 
 ^ Gilpin, 1204 ; Elliot, 366. 
 
1787. THE PRESIDENT. 331 
 
 one should not be of his own state. This Madison approved, 
 believing that the citizens would give their second vote with 
 sincerity to the next object of their choice.* We shall meet 
 the proposition again. 
 
 Lastly, Dickinson said : " Insuperable objections lie against 
 an election of the executive by the national legislature, or by 
 the legislatures or executives of the states. I have long leaned 
 toward an election by the people, which I regard as the best 
 and the purest source. Let the people of each state choose its 
 best citizen, and out of the thirteen names thus selected an ex- 
 ecutive magistrate may be chosen, either by the national legis- 
 lature or by electors appointed by it." f 
 
 From hopelessness of an agreement, Gerry and Butler 
 were willing to refer the resolution relating to the executive 
 to a committee, but Wilson insisted that a general principle 
 must first be fixed by a vote of the house. :j: 
 
 On the morning of the next day * Mason recapitulated all 
 the seven different ways that had been proposed of electing 
 the chief magistrate : by the people at large ; by the legisla- 
 tures of the states ; by the executives of the states ; by electors 
 chosen by the people ; by electors chosen by lot ; by the legis- 
 lature on the nomination of three or two candidates by each 
 several state ; by the legislature on the nomination of one can- 
 didate from each state. After reviewing them all, he con- 
 cluded that an election by the national legislature, as originally 
 proposed, was the best. At the same time he held it to be the 
 very palladium of civil liberty, that the great ofiicers of state, 
 and particularly the executive, should at fixed periods return 
 to that mass from which they were taken. Led for the mo- 
 ment by this train of thought, the convention by six states, 
 against Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland, with Yirginia 
 equally divided, resolved that a national executive be insti- 
 tuted ; to consist of a single person ; who should be chosen by 
 the national legislature ; for the term of seven years ; and be 
 inehgible a second time. || 
 
 Foremost in undiminished disapproval of the choice of the 
 executive by the legislature were Washington, Madison, Wil- 
 
 * Gilpin, 1205 ; Elliot, S67. t Gilpin, 1207; Elliot, 368. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1206 ; Elliot, 367. * Ibid. || Gilpin, 1211 ; Elliot, 370. 
 
332 THE FEDEKAL CONVENTIOK b. iii. ; oh. ix. 
 
 son, Gouvernenr Morris, and Gerry ; foremost for the election 
 by that body were Eutledge, Mason, and, in a moderate de- 
 gree. Strong. During the debate Gouvernenr Morris had de- 
 clared : " Of all possible modes of appointing the executive, an 
 election by the people is the best ; an election by the legisla- 
 ture is the worst.* I prefer a short period and re-eligibility, 
 but a diiferent mode of election." f In this he spoke the 
 mind of Pennsylvania ; and he refused to accept the decision 
 of that day as final. 
 
 On the twenty-fourth of August the report of the com- 
 mittee of detail relating to the executive came before the con- 
 vention. All agreed that the executive power should be vested 
 in a single person, to be styled : the President of the United 
 States of America ; and none questioned that his title might 
 be : His Excellency. J According to the report, he was to be 
 elected by ballot by the legislature for a term of seven years, 
 but might not be elected a second time.* 
 
 The strife on the manner of his election revived. Daniel 
 Carroll of Maryland, seconded by "Wilson, renewed the mo- 
 tion, that he should be elected by the people ; but the house 
 was weary or unprepared to reopen the subject, and at the 
 moment the motion received only the votes of Pennsyl- 
 vania and Delaware. || Hutledge then moved that the elec- 
 tion of the president be made by the legislature in "joint 
 ballot." 
 
 The conducting of business, especially of elections, by the 
 two branches of the legislature in joint session was from early 
 days familiar to the states, and was at that time established in 
 every one of them which had prepared a constitution of its 
 own with two branches of the legislature, so that the regula- 
 tions for that mode of choice were perfectly well understood. 
 "New Hampshire had had the experience of both methods; 
 many of its officers were chosen annually by joint ballot, while 
 its representatives to congress were appointed by the concur- 
 rent vote of the two houses. Unhappily, throughout this part 
 of the work, the equal vote of the smaller states with the larger 
 
 * Gilpin, 1193, 1204 ; Elliot, 361, 366. * Gilpin, 1236 ; Elliot, 380. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1195 ; Elliot, 362. | Gilpin, 1418 ; Elliot, 472. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1417; Elliot, 472. 
 
1787. THE PEESIDENT. 333 
 
 ones in the senate persistently biased the movements of the 
 convention. 
 
 In the special interest of the smaller states Sherman ob- 
 jected to a vote of the two houses in joint ballot, because it 
 would deprive the senate of a negative on the more numerous 
 branch. " It is wrong," said Gorham, " to be considering at 
 every turn whom the senate will represent ; the pubHc good 
 is the object to be kept in view ; delay and confusion will en- 
 sue if the two houses vote separately, each having a negative 
 on the choice of the other." Dayton and Brearley, following 
 in the wake of Sherman, opposed a joint ballot, as impairing 
 the power of the smaller states;* but Langdon of JSTew 
 Hampshire, enlightened by experience at home, dwelt on the 
 great difficulties of which the mode of separate votes by the 
 two houses was productive ; and, like a good patriot as he was, 
 he approved the joint ballot, "though unfavorable to l^ew 
 Hampshire as a small state." "Wilson remarked "that the 
 senate might have an interest in throwing dilatory obstacles in 
 the way, if its separate concurrence should be required." On 
 the same side spoke Madison; and the motion of Kutledge 
 prevailed by seven states, against Connecticut, l^ew Jersey, 
 Maryland, and Georgia.t 
 
 These four states, joined by Delaware, then demanded that, 
 on the joint ballot, the vote should be taken by states ; the 
 decision turned on 'New Hampshire ; and following the patri- 
 otic opinion of Langdon, it joined the five larger states and 
 negatived the proposal. For an election of president, a ma- 
 jority of the votes of the members present was required, New 
 Jersey alone dissenting. J " In case the votes of the two 
 highest should be equal," Eead of Delaware, taking a clause 
 from the constitution of his own state, moved that the presi- 
 dent of the senate should have an additional vote ; but it was 
 disagreed to by a general negative. 
 
 At this moment Gouverneur Morris interposed with de- 
 cisive effect. He set forth the danger of legislative tyranny 
 that would follow from leaving the executive dependent on 
 the legislature for his election ; he dwelt once more on the 
 
 * Gilpin, 1418 ; Elliot, 472. f Gilpin, 1419 ; Elliot, 473. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1420 ; Elliot, 473. 
 
334 ' THE FEDERAL CONVENTIOK b. m. ; ch. ix. 
 
 " cabal and corruption " * wliicli would attach to that method 
 of choice. The plan of choosing the president bj electors, 
 which he now revived, had made such progress that five states 
 voted with him, among them Pennsylvania and Virginia. A 
 reference of the subject to a committee was lost for the mo- 
 ment bj a tie vote, Connecticut being divided. f But opinion 
 ripened so fast that, on the thirty-first of August, the mode of 
 choosing the president, his powers, and the question of his re- 
 eligibility, was with other unfinished business referred to a 
 grand committee of one from each state. The Eleven, ap- 
 pointed by ballot, were Gilman, King, Sherman, Brearley, 
 Gouverneur Morris, Dicldnson, Carroll, Madison, Williamson, 
 Butler, and Baldwin. J 
 
 Gouverneur Morris had loudly put forward his wish to 
 make of the senate a thoroughly aristocratic body, and of the 
 president a tenant for life. It agreed with this view to repose 
 the eventual election of the president in the senate. The 
 electoral colleges, in the want of all means of rapid intercom- 
 munication, would have rarely cast a majority for one man ; 
 and the requisition on the electors to vote each for two men 
 increased the chances that there would be no election, and that 
 one of the candidates at least would be a citizen of a smaller 
 state. He was aware that the outgoing president would be apt 
 to be a candidate for re-election ; and desired nothing better 
 than such a junction between the president and senate as would 
 secure a re-election during life. 
 
 Sherman hated aristocracy ; but he was specially watchful 
 of the equal power of the smaller states, and saw that, on the 
 first ballot of the election, the large states, having many votes, 
 would always bring forward their candidates with superior 
 strength. To gain a chance for electing a president from the 
 small states, they insisted that, in case there should be no elec- 
 tion by the colleges, not less than five names should be reported 
 as candidates for the eventual election, and among five names 
 there was a great probability that there would be one from the 
 smaller states. They therefore insisted that the eventual elec- 
 tion should be made by the senate ; and this was carried by a 
 
 * Gilpin, 1420; Elliot, 473. f Gilpin, 1421 ; Elliot, 474. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1478 ; Elliot, 503. 
 
1787. THE PRESIDENT. 335 
 
 coalition of aristocratic tendencies in Gouvemeur Morris and 
 others from the large states with the passion of the small states 
 for disproportionate chances for power. 
 
 The committee, having considered the subject in all its 
 bearings, made their report on the fourth daj of September.* 
 The term of the presidency was limited to four years ; and the 
 election was confided to electors to be appointed in each state 
 as its legislature might direct ; and to be equal to the whole 
 number of its senators and representatives in congress ; so that 
 the electoral colleges collectively were to be the exact counter- 
 part of the joint convention of the legislature. 
 
 The electors of each state were to meet f in their respective 
 states and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one, at least, 
 should not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. 
 A certified list of these votes, under the seal of the electoral 
 college, was to be transmitted to the president of the senate. J 
 
 " The president of the senate," discharging a purely minis- 
 terial ofiice, " shall in that house open all the certificates, and 
 the votes shall be then and there counted. The person having 
 the greatest number of votes shall be the president, if such 
 number be a majority of that of the electors ; and if there be 
 more than one who has such a majority and an equal number 
 of votes — a case that would most rarely, perhaps never, occur — 
 then the senate shall-*'' choose by ballot one of them for presi- 
 dent ; but if no person has a majority, then, from the five 
 highest on the list, ' the senate,' " in which body the smallest 
 state had an equal vote with the largest, " shall choose by ballot 
 the president." " After the choice of the president, the per- 
 son having the greatest number of votes," whether a majority 
 of them or not, '^ shall be vice-president" — an officer now for 
 the first time introduced; ^'but if there should remain two or 
 more who have equal votes, then the senate shall choose from 
 them the vice-president." || 
 
 Mason, who thought the insulated electoral colleges would 
 hardly ever unite their votes on one man, spoke earnestly: 
 
 * Gilpin, 1485-148S ; Elliot, 606, 607. f Gilpin, 1486 ; Elliot, 507. 
 X Ibid. 
 
 * " Immediately," not in original report. It was inserted 6 September. Gil- 
 pin, 1509 ; Elliot, 518, and i., 283, 289. || Gilpin, 1486, 1487 ; Elliot, 507. 
 
336 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION". b. hi. ; ch. ix. 
 
 ^' The plan is liable to this strong objection, that nineteen times 
 in twenty the president will be chosen by the senate, an im- 
 projDer body for the purpose." To the objection of Charles 
 Pinckney, that electors would be strangers to the several can- 
 didates, and unable to decide on their comparative merits, 
 Baldwin answered: "The increasing intercourse among the 
 people of the states will render important characters less and 
 less unknown." * " This subject," said Wilson, " has greatly 
 divided the house, and will divide the people. It is, in truth, 
 the most difficult of all on which we have had to decide. I 
 have never made up an opinion on it entirely to my own satis- 
 faction." The choice by electors " is, on the whole, a valuable 
 improvement on the former plan. It gets rid of cabal and 
 corruption ; and continental characters will multiply as we 
 more and more coalesce, so as to enable the electors in every 
 part of the union to know and judge of them. It clears the 
 way for a discussion of the question of the re-eligibility of the 
 president on its own merits, which the former mode of elec- 
 tion seemed to forbid. It may, however, be better to refer 
 the eventual appointment to the legislature than to the senate, 
 and to confine it to a smaller number than five of the candi- 
 dates." t 
 
 " I wish to know," asked Eandolph, chiming in with "Wil- 
 son, " why the eventual election is referred to the senate, and 
 not to the legislature ? I see no necessity for this, and many 
 objections to it." :[: 
 
 On the fifth. Mason, supported by Gerry, attempted to 
 reduce the number of candidates to be voted for from ^ye to 
 three ; * but the small states, who saw their best chance of fur- 
 nishing a president in the larger number, were humored by the 
 convention, and to the last the nimiber of ^Ye was not changed. 
 
 One great objection of Mason would be removed by depriv- 
 ing the senate of the eventual election. || Wilson proposed 
 the capital amendment, to transfer the eventual election from 
 the senate to the " legislature." '^ This change Dickinson ap- 
 proved. But the convention was not yet ripe for the motion, 
 
 * Gilpin, 1491 ; Elliot, 509. * Gilpin, 1502 ; Elliot, 514. 
 
 \ Gilpin, 1491, 1492 ; Elliot, 509. I Gilpin, 1498, 1499 ; Elliot, 513. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1492 ; Elliot, 510. ^ Gilpin, 1500; Elliot, 513. 
 
1787. THE PEESIDEN-T. 337 
 
 all the smaller states voting against it, except ISTew Hampsliire, 
 which was divided. 
 
 " The mode of appointment as now regulated," said Mason 
 at the close of the day, " is utterly inadmissible. I should pre- 
 fer the government of Prussia to one which will put all power 
 into the hands of seven or eight men " — a majority of a quorum 
 of the senate — "and fix an aristocracy worse than absolute 
 monarchy." * 
 
 On the sixth, Gerry, supported by King and Williamson, 
 proposed that the eventual election should be made by the 
 legislature. Sherman, sedulously supporting the chances of 
 the small states, remarked, that if the legislature, instead of 
 the senate, were to have the eventual appointment of the presi- 
 dent, it ought to vote by states. f 
 
 Wilson himself, on the same morning, spoke with singular 
 energy, disapproving alike the eventual choice of the presi- 
 dent by the equal vote of the states and the tendency to clothe 
 the senate with special powers : " I have weighed carefully the 
 report of the committee for remodelling the constitution of 
 the executive ; and, on combining it with other parts of the 
 plan, I am obliged to consider the whole as having a ten- 
 dency to aristocracy, as throwing a dangerous power into the 
 hands of the senate. They will have, in fact, the appoint- 
 ment of the president, and, through his dependence on them, 
 the virtual appointment to ofiices — among others, the officers 
 of the judiciary department ; they are to make treaties ; and 
 they are to try all impeachments. The legislative, executive, 
 and judiciary powers are all blended in one branch of the 
 government. The power of making treaties involves the case 
 of subsidies ; and here, as an additional evil, foreign influence 
 is to be dreaded. According to the plan as it now stands, 
 the president will not be the man of the people, as he ought 
 to be, but the minion of the senate. He cannot even appoint 
 a tide-waiter without it. I have always thought the senate 
 too numerous a body for making appointments to office. With 
 all their powers, and the president in their interest, they will 
 depress the other branch of the legislature, and aggrandize 
 themselves in proportion. The new mode of appointing the 
 
 * Gilpin, 1503 ; Elliot, 515. f Gilpin, 1504 ; Elliot, 516. 
 
 VOL. VI. — 22 
 
338 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. ni. ; en. ix 
 
 president bj electors is a valuable improvement; but I can 
 never agree to purchase it at the price of the ensuing parts of 
 the report." * 
 
 " The mutual connection of the president and senate," said 
 Hamilton, " will perpetuate the one and aggrandize both. I 
 see no better remedy than to let the highest number of ballots, 
 whether a majority or not, appoint the president." f The 
 same motion had the day before been offered by Mason, J but 
 the convention, especially the smaller states, inflexibly required 
 a majority. 
 
 WilHamson, to avoid favoring aristocracy in the senate, and 
 yet to secure the assent of the small states, wished to transfer 
 the eventual choice to the legislature, voting by states. To 
 the legislature Sherman preferred the house of representatives, 
 the members from each state having one vote ; * and the con- 
 vention so decided by ten states out of eleven. 
 
 ]^or would the convention intrust the counting of the 
 votes to the senate alone. By amendments adopted on the 
 sixth,! it was thus finally established: "The president of the 
 senate shall, in the presence of the senate and house of repre- 
 sentatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be 
 counted." In every stage of the proceeding the convention 
 suffered no chance for the failure of an election, and had spe- 
 cially guarded against the failure of an election by the nega- 
 tive of one house upon the other, leaving the rules for the 
 conduct of the electoral colleges, or of the two houses when in 
 presence of each other, to be suppHed by the familiar expe- 
 rience of the states. On one point, and on one point only, 
 the several states of that day differed in their manner of count- 
 ing votes. In Yirginia the ballot of the two houses was taken 
 in each house respectively, and the boxes examined jointly by 
 a committee of each house. In Massachusetts the whole work 
 was done by the senators and representatives assembled in one 
 room. On this point, therefore, and on this point only, there 
 was need of a special regulation ; and, accordingly, the consti- 
 tution enjoined the counting of the votes in the presence of 
 
 * Gilpin, 1504, 1505; Elliot, 5l6. ** Gilpin, 1510; Elliot, 5l9. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1507 ; Elliot, 517. I Gilpin, 1509, I5l3 ; Elliot, 6l8, 520. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1498, 1499 ; Elliot, 5l3. 
 
1787. THE PRESIDENT. 339 
 
 the senate and house of representatives after the manner of 
 Massachusetts.* 
 
 The language of this clause of the constitution is a concise, 
 clear, and imperative command; "The votes shall then be 
 counted." The convention is left with no one but itself to in- 
 terpret its duties and prescribe its rules of action. ISTo power 
 whatever over the counting of the votes is devolved on the 
 house of representatives or on the senate ; whatever is granted 
 is granted to the two houses " in the presence of " each other ; 
 representing the states and the people according to the com- 
 promise adopted for the electoral colleges. 
 
 And now the whole line of march to the mode of the elec- 
 tion of the president can be surveyed. The convention at first 
 reluctantly conferred that office on the national legislature; 
 and to prevent the possibility of failure by a negative of one 
 house on the other, to the legislature voting in joint ballot. 
 To escape from danger of cabal and corruption, it next trans- 
 ferred full and final power of choice to an electoral college 
 
 * Constitution of Virginia, of 1776. B. P. Poore's edition, 1910, 1911. A 
 governor, or chief magistrate, shall be chosen annually by joint ballot of both 
 houses (to be taken in each house respectively) deposited in the conference room ; 
 the boxes examined jointly by a committee of each house, and the numbers sever- 
 ally reported to them that the appointments may be entered (which shall be the 
 mode of taking the joint ballot of both houses, in all cases). . . . 
 
 A privy council, or council of state, consisting of eight m-embers, shall be 
 chosen by joint ballot of both houses of assembly. 
 
 The delegates for Virginia to the continental congress shall be chosen annu- 
 ally, or superseded in the mean time, by joint ballot of both houses of assembly. 
 
 The two houses of assembly shall, by joint ballot, appoint judges of the su- 
 preme court of appeals, and general court, judges in chancery, judges of admiral- 
 ty, secretary, and the attorney-general, to be commissioned by the governor, and 
 continue in office during good beha-vior. 
 
 Constitution of Massachusetts, of 1780. B, P. Poore's edition, 967, 969. Ch. 
 IT., Art. IT. Nine councillors shall be annually chosen from among the persons 
 returned for councillors and senators, on the last Wednesday in May, by the joint 
 ballot of the senators and representatives assembled in one room. 
 
 Ch. II., Art. I. The secretary, treasurer, and receiver-general, and the commis- 
 Fary-general, notaries public, and naval officers, shall be chosen annually, by joint 
 ballot of the senators and representatives, in one room. 
 
 Ch, IV. The delegates of this commonwealth to the congress of the United 
 States shall, some time in the month of June, annually, be elected by the joint 
 ballot of the senate and house of representatives assembled together in one 
 room. 
 
340 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION-. b. hi. ; ch. ix. 
 
 that should be the exact counterpart of the joint convention of 
 the two honses in the representation of the states as units, as 
 well as the population of the states, and should meet at the seat 
 of government. Then, fearing that so large a number of men 
 would not travel to the seat of government for that single pur- 
 pose, or might be hindered on the way, they most reluctantly 
 went back to the choice of the president by the two houses in 
 joint convention. At this moment the thought arose that the 
 electors might cast their votes in their own several states, and 
 transmit the certificates of their ballots to the seat of govern- 
 ment. Accordingly, the work of electing a president was di- 
 vided; the convention removed the act of voting from the 
 joint session of the two houses to electoral colleges in the sev- 
 eral states, the act of voting to be followed by the transmission 
 of authenticated certificates of the votes to a branch of the gen- 
 eral legislature at the seat of government ; and then it restored 
 to the two houses in presence of each other the same office of 
 counting the collected certificates which they would have per- 
 formed had the choice remained with the two houses of the 
 legislature. Should no one have a majority, the eventual elec- 
 tion of the president, to satisfy the rising jealousy of the pre- 
 rogatives of the senate, was assigned to the house of represen- 
 tatives, and, to please the small states, to the representatives 
 voting by states. And the house of representatives was in the 
 clearest language ordered " immediately " to choose by ballot 
 one of two, when their vote was equal, one of five where no 
 person had a majority. In this way a collision between the 
 two houses, by a negative vote of one on the other, was com- 
 pletely guarded against in every stage of the procedure."^ 
 
 * When, thirteen years later, this clause came up for consideration, Madison 
 and Baldwin, two surviving members of the grand committee to whom the federal 
 convention had referred everything relating to the choice of the president, left on 
 record their interpretation of the clause. For the opinion of Madison, see Madison 
 to Jefferson, 4 April 1800, in writings of Madison, ii., 158, where the name "Ni- 
 cholson's " is erroneously printed for " Nicholas's," as appears from a comparison 
 which has been made of the printed letter with the original. The opinion of Bald- 
 win is found in " Counting Electoral Votes," page 19. Baldwin gives his vote 
 with Langdon and Pinckney, both of whom had been members of the federal con- 
 vention, for the right of the joint convention to count the votes. By the kindness 
 of Miss Sarah Nicholas Randolph, granddaughter of Governor Wilson Gary Nicho- 
 las of Virginia, and great-granddaughter of Thomas Jefferson, I have been al- 
 
1787. THE PKESIDENT. 341 
 
 The almost certain election of the vice-president was secured 
 by declaring the candidate haying the most votes to be duly 
 elected. In the extremely improbable case, that two persons 
 should lead all the candidates with an exactly equal number of 
 votes, the election was to devolve on the senate. 
 
 " Such an officer as vice-president," said "Williamson on the 
 seventh, " is not wanted." * To make an excuse for his exist- 
 ence, the convention decreed that he should be president of the 
 senate. " That," said Mason, '' is an encroachment on the sen- 
 ate's rights ; and, moreover, it mixes too much the legislative 
 and the executive." It was seen that the vice-president brings 
 to the chair of the senate the dignity of one of the two high- 
 est officers in the land chosen by the whole country ; and yet 
 that he can have no real influence in a body upon which he is 
 imposed by an extraneous vote. 
 
 That the vice-president should, in the event of a vacancy, 
 act as president, prevents the need of a new election before the 
 end of the regular term ; but an immediate appeal to the peo- 
 ple might give a later and truer expression of its wishes. 
 
 "While the method to be adopted for the election of the 
 president still engaged the untiring efforts of the convention, it 
 proceeded in the ascertainment of his powers. His style was 
 
 lowed to take from the holograph of Jefferson a copy of his paper on this subject, 
 written by him for the use of W. C. Nicholas when senator from Virginia in con- 
 gress in 1800. 
 
 The question as voted upon in congress in 1800 was decided not by any bear- 
 ing on the selection of Jefferson or Burr for the presidency, for the party opposed 
 to Jefferson had a majority in each branch, but on the unwillingness of the sen- 
 ate to give to the house of representatives superior weight in the decision of elec- 
 tions. Jefferson, iv., 322. The vice-president was never charged with the power 
 to count the votes. The person who counted the first votes for president and vice- 
 president was no vice-president, but a senator elected by the senate as its presid- 
 ing officer for that act under a special authority conferred by the constitution for 
 that one occasion when the constitution was to be set in motion. 
 
 On any pretence of a right in the vice-president to count the votes, compare 
 the words spoken in the senate by Senator Conkling, 23 and 24 January 1877, and 
 Senator Edmunds, 20 November 1 877. The laws of historical criticism require 
 the historian to study the words of the state constitutions from which the article 
 in the United States constitution is taken, and the practice of the state legislatures 
 of that day under the original articles in the state constitutions ; and these must 
 decide on the right interpretation of the language employed in the constitution of 
 the United States. * Gilpin, 1517 ; Elliot, 522. 
 
342 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; en. ix. 
 
 declared to be " the President of the United States of America ; " 
 the clause that his title should be " His Excellency " was still 
 suffered to linger in the draft. He was to be the minister to 
 carry out the will of the legislature, and see tliat the laws are 
 executed. It was made his duty to give information of the 
 state of the union ; and to recommend necessary and expedient 
 measures. He could not prorogue the two branches of the 
 legislature nor either of them ; nor appeal to the people by 
 dissolving them. They alone had the power to adjourn ; but 
 on extraordinary occasions to him belonged the prerogative to 
 convene them, or to convene the senate alone. 
 
 Wilson was most apprehensive that the legislature, by swal- 
 lovdng up all the other powers, would lead to a dissolution of 
 the government, no adequate self -defensive power having been 
 granted either to the executive or judicial department.* To 
 strengthen the president and raise a strong barrier against rash 
 legislation, Gouverneur Morris would have granted the presi- 
 dent a qualified veto on the repeal of a law, an absolute veto on 
 every act of legislation.f 
 
 In June the convention had agreed that the veto of the 
 president on an act of congress could be overruled by two thirds 
 of each house ; on the fifteenth of August, at the instance of 
 "Williamson, it was agreed that the veto of the president could 
 be overruled only by three fourths of each branch of congress, 
 and on the next day the same rule was applied to every order, 
 resolution, or vote to which the concurrence of the two houses 
 might be necessary, except it were a question of adjournment.:|: 
 
 Sherman, on the twenty-fifth of August, had proposed that 
 pardons should require the consent of the senate ; but no state 
 except his own was willing thus to restrict the clemency of the 
 president.* 
 
 All agreed that he should be commander-in-chief of the 
 army and the navy ; but, on the twenty-seventh of August, at 
 Sherman's instance, he was to command the militia only when 
 it should be called into the actual service of the United States. || 
 
 The men who made the constitution had taken to heart the 
 
 * Gilpin, 1836, 183Y; Elliot, 430. * Gilpin, 1433 ; Elliot, 480. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1334 ; Elliot, 429. fl Gilpin, 1434 ; Elliot, 480. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1337, 1338; Elliot, 431. 
 
irsr. THE PRESIDENT. 343 
 
 lesson tliat the three great powers — legislative, judicial, and ex- 
 ecutive — should be lodged in different hands. "Executing 
 the laws and appointing officers not appertaining to and ap- 
 pointed by the legislature," Wilson had said, so early as the 
 first of June, " are strictly executive powers." * Yet it seemed 
 needful to keep watch over the president, and Gerry f and 
 Sherman had favored the appointment of an executive council.:]: 
 Charles Pinckney wished the president to consult the heads 
 of the principal departments.* " A superfluous proposition," 
 said Hamilton, " for the president will at any rate have that 
 right." Mercer, on the fourteenth of August, suggested " a 
 council composed of members of both houses of the legislature 
 to stand between the aristocracy and the executive." || But the 
 thought did not take root. 
 
 The convention was anxious to reconcile a discreet watch- 
 fulness over the executive with his independence. In August 
 Ellsworth had recommended a council to be composed of the 
 president of the senate, the chief justice, and the ministers, or 
 secretaries as Gouverneur Morris named them, of the foreign, 
 the interior, war, treasury, and navy departments, " to advise, but 
 not conclude the president." ^ Gerry pronounced the nomi- 
 nation of the chief justice particularly exceptionable. () Dick- 
 inson urged that the great appointments of the heads of depart- 
 ments should be made by the legislature, in which case they 
 might properly be consulted by the executive. The elaborate 
 plan of a council of state which Gouverneur Morris proposed 
 on the twentieth differed from that of Ellsworth mainly in its 
 exclusion of the president of the senate. 
 
 The persistent convention next consulted its committee of 
 detail, which on the twenty-second reported : that " the privy 
 council of the president of the United States shall consist of 
 the president of the senate, the speaker of the house of repre- 
 sentatives, the chief justice of the supreme court, and the prin- 
 cipal officer in each of five departments as they shall from time 
 to time be established ; their duty shall be to advise him in 
 
 * Gilpin, '763; Elliot, 141. f Gilpin, 1318; Elliot, 421. 
 
 f Ibid. ^ Gilpin, 1358, 1359 ; Elliot, 442. 
 
 i Gilpin, 782 ; Elliot, 150. Gilpin, 1359 ; Elliot, 442. 
 « Gilpin, 811 ; Elliot, 165. 
 
344 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; en. ix. 
 
 matters wliicli he shall lay before them ; but their advice shall 
 not conclude him, nor affect his responsibility." * The report 
 did not satisfy the convention, which, still hopeful and perse- 
 vering, referred the subject to the grand committee of the 
 eleven states. 
 
 The report of the committee, made on the fourth of Sep- 
 tember, did no more than permit the executive to " require 
 the opinion in writing of the principal officer in each of the 
 executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties 
 of his office." f "In rejecting a council to the president," 
 such were the final words of Mason, "we are about to try an 
 experiment on which the most despotic government has never 
 ventured ; the Grand Seignior himself has his Divan ; " and 
 he proposed an executive council to be appointed by the legis- 
 lature or by the senate, and to consist of two members from 
 the eastern, two from the middle, and two from the southern 
 states ; with a rotation and duration of office similar to those 
 of the senate. J He was seconded by Franklin, who " thought 
 a council would be a check on a bad president, a relief to a 
 good one." * Wilson " approved of a council, in preference 
 to making the senate a party to appointments." So did Dick- 
 inson and Madison ; but the motion gained only three states ; || 
 and then by a unanimous vote the president was authorized to 
 take written opinions of the heads of departments,"^ who thus 
 became his constitutional advisers. 
 
 The failure to establish an efficient council led the conven- 
 tion most reluctantly to vest the senate with some control over 
 acts of the executive. On the seventh it was agreed " that 
 the president shall have the power to make treaties by and with 
 the advice and consent of the senate." () " And of the house 
 of representatives," "Wilson would have added ; saying : " As 
 treaties are to have the operation of laws, they ought to have 
 the sanction of laws." But Sherman represented that the ne- 
 cessity of secrecy forbade a reference to both houses, and every 
 state assented except Pennsylvania. J 
 
 * Gilpin, 1398, 1399 ; Elliot, 4G2. |I Gilpin, 1524 ; Elliot, 526. 
 f Gilpin, 14S8 ; Elliot, 507. ^ Ibid. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1523 ; Elliot, 525. ^ Gilpin, 1519, Elliot, 523. 
 
 * Ibid. X Gilpin, 1519 ; Elliot, 523. 
 
1787. THE PRESIDENT. 345 
 
 It has already been related that to diminish the temptation 
 to war, the power to declare it was confided to the legislature. 
 In treaties of peace, Madison, fearing in a president a passion 
 for continuing war, proposed to dispense with his concurrence. 
 " The means of carrying on the war," said Gorham, " will not 
 be in the hands of the president, but of the legislature." " No 
 peace," insisted Gouverneur Morris, " ought to be made with- 
 out the concurrence of the president, who is the general guar- 
 dian of the nation." And Maryland, South Carolina, and 
 Georgia alone voted for the amendment.* 
 
 On the seventh, the advice and consent of the senate was, 
 by a unanimous vote, required for the appointment of ambas- 
 sadors, other public ministers, consuls, and judges of the sti* 
 preme court ; f and for all other officers of the United States 
 by nine states against Pennsylvania and South Carolina. { 
 But eight days later the legislature was authorized to vest the 
 appointment of inferior officers in the president alone, in the 
 courts of law, or in the heads of departments.* 
 
 All agreed in giving the president power to fill up, tem- 
 porarily, vacancies that might happen during the recess of the 
 senate. || 
 
 Had the consent of the senate been made necessary to dis- 
 place as well as to appoint, the executive would have suffered 
 degradation ; and the relative importance of the house of rep- 
 resentatives a grave diminution. To change the tenure of 
 office from the good opinion of the president, who is the em- 
 ployer and needs efficient agents in executing the laws, to the 
 favor of the senate, which has no executive powers, would 
 create a new fealty alien to the duties of an officer of the 
 United States. 
 
 " The three distinct powers, legislative, judicial, and execu- 
 tive," said Ellsworth, as senator, in 1789, explaining the con- 
 stitution which he had done so much to frame, " should be 
 placed in different hands. He shall take care that the laws he 
 faithfully executed^ are sweeping words. The officers should 
 be attentive to the president, to whom the senate is not a coun- 
 
 * Gilpin, 1521, 1522 ; Elliot, 524, 525. =» Gilpin, 1588, 1589 ; Elliot, 550. 
 t Glipin, 1520 ; Elliot, 528, 524. U Gilpin, 1520; Elliot, 524. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1520; Elliot, 524. 
 
346 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. m. ; ch. ix. 
 
 cil. To turn a man out of office is an exercise neither of 
 legislative nor of judicial power. The advice of the senate 
 does not make the appointment ; the president appoints : there 
 are certain restrictions in certain cases, but the restriction is 
 as to the appointment and not as to the removal." ^ 
 
 One question on the qualifications of the president was 
 among the last to be decided. On the twenty-second of August 
 the committee of detail, fixing the requisite age of the presi- 
 dent at thirty-five, on their own motion and for the first time 
 required that the president should be a citizen of the United 
 States, and should have been an inhabitant of them for twenty- 
 one years. t The idea then arose that no number of years 
 could properly prepare a foreigner for the office of presi- 
 dent ; bat as men of other lands had spilled their blood in the 
 cause of the United States, and had assisted at every stage of 
 the formation of their institutions, the committee of states who 
 were charged with all unfinished business proposed, on the 
 fourth of September, that " no person except a natural-born 
 citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the 
 adoption of this constitution, should be eligible to the office of 
 president," and for the foreign-born proposed a reduction of 
 the requisite years of residence to fourteen. On the seventh 
 of September the modification, with the restriction as to the 
 age of the president, was unanimously adopted. 
 
 "No majorities of the legislature could force a president to 
 retire before the end of his term ; but he might be impeached 
 by the house of representatives for treason, bribery, or other 
 high crimes and misdemeanors. The tribunal for his arraign- 
 ment was at first the supreme court of the United States ; but 
 they would be few in number ; the president, after condemna- 
 tion, might be further amenable to them ; and besides, they 
 would be of his appointment. Hamilton had suggested a 
 forum composed of the chief justice of each state. :j: Contrary 
 to the opinion of Madison, the English precedent was followed, 
 and the senate was made the court to try all officers liable to 
 impeachment ; and, on conviction by a two thirds vote, to re- 
 move them. As the vice-president, on the president's removal, 
 
 * MS. report of Ellsworth's speech by William Patcrson. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1398 ; Elliot, 4G2. X Gilpin, 892, 1158 ; Elliot, 205, 342. 
 
1787. THE PRESIDENT. 347 
 
 would succeed to Ms place, the chief justice was directed to 
 preside on the trial of the president. 
 
 At so late a day as the fourteenth of September, Rutledge 
 and Gouverneur Morris moved that persons impeached be sus- 
 pended from their offices until they be tried and acquitted ; but 
 Madison defeated the proposition by pointing out that this in- 
 termediate suspension would put it in the power of one branch 
 only to vote a temporary removal of the existing magistrate.* 
 
 Judgment in cases of impeachment could extend only to 
 removal from office and disqualification; but the party re- 
 mained liable to indictment, trial, and punishment, according 
 to law. The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeach- 
 ment, could be only by jury. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1572; Elliot, 512. 
 
348 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. B.ni.;oH.x. 
 
 CHAPTEE X. 
 
 the federal judiciaey. 
 
 August aub September 1787. 
 
 The resolution on the federal judiciary whicli went from 
 the convention to the committee of detail purposely described 
 the extent of its jurisdiction in vague and general terms. The 
 very able lawyers on that committee, Hutledge, "Wilson, Ran- 
 dolph, and Ellsworth, proceeding with equal boldness and pre- 
 cision, shrinking from aggressions on the rights of the states 
 and yet entertaining efficient and comprehensive designs, 
 brought in a report, which caused little diversity of opinion, 
 and was held to need no essential amendment. But on one 
 point they kept silence. A deeply-seated dread of danger from 
 hasty legislation pervaded the mind of the convention ; and 
 Mason, Madison, and others persistently desired to vest in the 
 supreme court a revisionary power over the acts of congress, 
 with an independent negative, or a negative in conjunction 
 with the executive. Though the measure had been repeatedly 
 brought forward and as often put aside, Madison, on the fif- 
 teenth of August, proposed once more that " Every bill which 
 shall have passed the two houses shall, before it becomes a law, 
 be severally presented to the president of the United States, 
 and to the judges of the supreme court, for the revision of 
 each ; " * the veto of the judges not to be overthrown by less 
 than two thirds, nor, if the president joined them, by less than 
 three fourths of each house. He was seconded by Wilson. 
 
 Charles Pinckney opposed the interference of the judges in 
 legislation, because it would involve them in the conflict of 
 
 * Gilpin, 1332 ; Elliot, 428. 
 
1787. THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY. 349 
 
 parties and tinge tlieir opinions before tlieir action in court. 
 " The judiciary," said John Francis Mercer of Maryland, 
 " ought to be separate from the legislative and independent of 
 it. I disapprove the doctrine that the judges should, as ex- 
 positors of the constitution, have authority to declare a law 
 void. Laws ought to be well and cautiously made, and then 
 to be uncontrollable." * To the regret of Gouvemeur Morris, 
 the motion of Madison was supported only by Maryland, Dela- 
 ware, and Yirginia. Dickinson was strongly impressed with 
 the objection to the power of the judges to set aside the law. 
 He thought no such power ought to exist, but was at a loss for 
 a substitute. " The justiciary of Aragon," he observed, " be- 
 came by degrees the law-giver." f 
 
 On the morning of the twentieth Charles Pinckney sub- 
 mitted numerous propositions ; among them was one that 
 " Each branch of the legislature, as well as the supreme execu- 
 tive, shall have authority to require the opinions of the su- 
 preme judicial court upon important questions of law, and 
 upon solemn occasions." J This article, as well as the rest, was 
 referred to the committee of detail, without debate or consid- 
 eration by the house, and was never again heard of. 
 
 On the twenty-seventh the article on the judiciary reported 
 by the committee of detail was taken up ; and it was agreed 
 that " the judicial power of the United States shall be vested 
 in one supreme court, and such inferior courts as shall, when 
 necessary, from time to time, be constituted by the legislature 
 of the United States." * " The judges of the supreme court, 
 and of the inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good 
 behavior. They shall, at stated times, receive for their services 
 a compensation which shall not be diminished during their 
 continuance in office." || Judges of inferior courts were clothed 
 * with the same independence of the two other branches of the 
 government as the judges of the supreme court. 
 
 Dickinson thought that the tenure of office was made too 
 absolute; and, following the example of Great Britain and 
 Massachusetts, he desired that the judges should be removable 
 
 * Gilpin, 1333 ; Elliot, 429. # Gilpin, 1435 ; Elliot, 481. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1334; Elliot, 429. |! Gilpin, 1437; Elliot, 482. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1365; Elliot, 445; i., 249. 
 
S50 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b.iii.;oh.x. 
 
 by the executive on application of the senate and the house of 
 representatives.'^ " If the supreme court," said Rutledge, " is to 
 judge between the United States and particular states, this alone 
 is an insuperable objection to the motion." The clause gained 
 no vote but that of Connecticut, Massachusetts being absent. 
 In England the highest judicial officer is liable to change with 
 every change of administration, and every one may be removed 
 on the request of a majority in each house of parliament ; 
 every judge of the United States, from the highest to the 
 lowest, is an officer for life, unless on impeachment he should 
 be convicted by the vote of two thirds of the senate. 
 
 The judicial power was by a motion of Johnson extended 
 to cases in law and equity. He further proposed to extend 
 it " to all cases arising under the constitution ; " and the mo- 
 tion was agreed to without dissent, because in the opinion of 
 the convention the jurisdiction given was constructively limited 
 to cases of a judiciary nature. f 
 
 In this way Madison's scheme of restraining unconstitu- 
 tional legislation of the states by reserving to the legislature of 
 the union a veto on every act of state legislation was finally 
 abandoned ; and the power of revising and reversing a claase 
 of a state law that conflicted with the federal constitution was 
 confided exclusively to the federal judiciary, but only when a 
 case should be properly brought before the court. The deci- 
 sion of the court in all cases within its jurisdiction is final be- 
 tween the parties to a suit, and must be carried into effect by 
 the proper officers ; but, as an interpretation of the constitu- 
 tion, it does not bind the president or the legislature of the 
 United States. Under the same qualification the constitution 
 gives to the judges the power to compare any act of congress 
 with the constitution. But the supreme bench can set aside in 
 an act of congress or of a state only that which is at variance 
 with the constitution ; if it be merely one clause, or even but 
 one word, they can overrule that word or that clause, and no 
 more. The whole law can never be set aside unless every part 
 of it is tainted with unconstitutionality. :j: 
 
 Kutledge next observed that the jurisdiction of the court 
 
 * Gilpin, 1436 ; Elliot, 431. f Gilpin, 1438, 1439 ; Elliot, 483. 
 
 :{: Curtis in Howard, xix., 623. 
 
1787. THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY. 351 
 
 should extend to treaties made, or to be made, Tinder the 
 authority of the United States ; and this proposal was readily 
 adopted.* 
 
 The proposition that the courts should conduct the trial of 
 impeachments was put aside, and that duty was afterward as- 
 signed to the senate. Two clauses in the report of the commit- 
 tee of detail, which, after a precedent in the confederacy, con- 
 fided to the senate the settlement of all controversies between 
 two or more states respecting jurisdiction or territory, and all 
 controversies concerning grants of the same lands by two or 
 more states, were in the course of the discussion removed from 
 the senate and made over to the federal courts. 
 
 In constructing the judiciary, extreme care was taken to 
 keep out of the United States courts all questions which re- 
 lated to matters that began and ended within a separate com- 
 monwealth. This intention is stamped alike on the federal 
 proposals of Virginia, of New Jersey, and of Connecticut ; it 
 was carefully respected in those clauses which limit the action 
 of the individual states. 
 
 The original jurisdiction of the supreme court embraces 
 only cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and 
 consuls. Cases in which a state should be a party were added 
 for the single purpose of authorizing a state as plaintiff to 
 seek justice in a federal court ; it was as little intended to per- 
 mit individuals to bring a state there as defendant as to arraign 
 an ambassador. The appellate power included cases of admi- 
 ralty and maritime jurisdiction. In these three classes the juris- 
 diction of the court, original in two of them, appellate in the 
 third, is in imperative language extended " to all cases." But 
 as " to controversies to which the United States shall be a party ; 
 to controversies between two or more states ; between a state 
 and citizens of another state ; between citizens of different 
 states ; between citizens of the same state claiming lands under 
 grants of different states, and between a state or the citizens 
 thereof and foreign states, citizens or subjects," the judicial 
 power is limited. The section implies that only a part of the 
 controversies in each of the enumerated classes may come un- 
 der the jurisdiction of the federal courts ; and it was left to 
 
 * Gilpin, 14S9 ; Elliot, 483. 
 
• 352 THE FEDEEAL COKVENTION". b.iii.;ch.x. 
 
 the federal legislature to make the discrimination which in its 
 judgment public policy might dictate.'^ Here congress, and 
 congress alone, selects the controversies to which the appellate 
 judicial power may extend, and at its own judgment limits the 
 right of appeal. The convention purposely made it the duty 
 of congress to watch over the development of the system, and 
 restrict accordingly the appellate jurisdiction. Bj reserving 
 to the tribunals of the states jurisdiction over cases that may 
 properly belong to them, it may rescue the federal court from 
 the danger of losing its efficiency beneath larger masses of 
 business than it can dispose of. 
 
 The method of choosing the federal judiciary was settled 
 without strife. The motion for its appointment by the execu- 
 tive, with the advice and consent of the senate, when first pro- 
 posed, gained an equal vote ; and on the seventh of September 
 was agreed to without a division.f 
 /S The supreme court was to be the " bulwark of a limited 
 constitution against legislative encroachments." J A bench of 
 a few, selected with care by the president and senate from the 
 nation, seemed a safer tribunal than a multitudinous assembly 
 elected for a short period under the sway of passing currents of 
 thought, or the intrepid fixedness of an uncompromising party. 
 There always remains danger of erroneous judgments, arising 
 from mistakes, imperfect investigation, the bias of previous 
 connections, the seductions of ambition, or the instigations of 
 surrounding opinions ; and a court from which there is no ap- 
 peal is apt to forget circumspection in its sense of security. 
 The passage of a judge from the bar to the bench does not nec- 
 essarily divest him of prejudices ; nor chill his relations to the 
 particular political party to which he may owe his advance- 
 ment ; nor blot out of his memory the great interests which he 
 may have professionally piloted through doubtful straits ; nor 
 quiet the ambition which he is not required to renounce, even 
 though his appointment is for life; nor cure predilections 
 which sometimes have their seat in his own inmost nature. 
 
 But the constitution retains the means of protecting itseK 
 against the errors of partial or interested judgments. In the 
 
 * Story in Curtis, iii., 669 ; Ellsworth in Curtis, i., 243. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1520; Elliot, 524. X Federalist, ksYiii. 
 
1787. THE FEDEPwAL JUDICIARY. 353 
 
 first place, the force of a judicial opinion of tlie supreme court, 
 in so far as it is irreversible, reaches only the particular case in 
 dispute; and to this society submits, in order to escape from 
 anarchy in the daily routine of business. To the decision on 
 an underlying question of constitutional law no such finality 
 attaches. To endure, it must be right. If it is right, it will 
 approve itself to the universal sense of the impartial. A judge 
 who can justly lay claim to integrity will never lay claim to in- 
 fallibility ; but with indefatigable research will add, retract, 
 and correct whenever more mature consideration shows the 
 need of it.* The court is itself inferior and subordinate to the 
 constitution ; it has only a delegated authority, and every opin- 
 ion contrary to the tenor of its commission is void, except as 
 settling the case on trial. The prior act of the superior must 
 be preferred to the subsequent act of an inferior ; otherwise it 
 might transform the limited into an unlimited constitution. 
 When laws clash, the latest law is rightly held to express the 
 corrected will of the legislature ; but the constitution is the 
 fundamental code, the law of laws ; and where there is a con- 
 flict between the constitution and a decision of the court, the 
 original permanent act of the superior outweighs the later act 
 of the inferior, and retains its own supreme energy unaltered 
 and unalterable except in the manner prescribed by the consti- 
 tution itseK. To say that a court, having discovered an error, 
 should yet cling to it because it has once been delivered as its 
 opinion, is to invest caprice with inviolability and make a 
 wrong judgment of a servant outweigh the constitution to 
 which he has sworn obedience. An act of the legislature at 
 variance with the constitution is pronounced void; an opin- 
 ion of the supreme court at variance with the constitution is 
 equally so. 
 
 ^^--^Next to the court itself, the men who framed the constitu- 
 tion relied upon the power and the readiness of congress to 
 punish through impeachment the substitution of the personal 
 will of the judge for the law. 
 
 A third influence may rise up " as the rightful interpreter 
 of this great charter " of American rights and American power 
 in " the good sense " f of the land, wiser than the judges alone, 
 
 * Wilson's Works, i., 29. j Cooley's Constitutional Law, 224 ; Curtis, iv., 390. 
 VOL. VI. — 23 
 
354: THE FEDERAL CONVENTION b. hi. ; oh. x. 
 
 because it includes within itself the wisdom of the judges them- 
 selves ; and this may lead either to the better instruction of the 
 court, or to an amendment of the constitution by the collective 
 mind of the country. 
 
 The consolidation of the union was to be made visible to 
 the nation and the world by the establishment of a seat of gov- 
 ernment for the United States under their exclusive jurisdic- 
 tion ; and like authority was to be exercised over all places pur- 
 chased for forts, dock-yards, and other needful buildings.* It 
 was not doubted that the government of the union should de- 
 fend each state against foreign enemies and concurrently against 
 domestic violence ; and should guarantee to every one of the 
 states the form of a republic, f 
 
 Sherman hesitated about granting power to establish uni- 
 form laws on the subject of bankruptcies, lest they might be 
 made punishable even with death. " This," said Goavemeur 
 Morris, " is an extensive and delicate subject. I see no danger 
 of abuse of the power by the legislature of the United States." J 
 On the question the clause was agreed to, Connecticut alone 
 being in the negative. 
 
 So soon as it was agreed that the states should have an 
 equal representation in the senate, the small states ceased to be 
 jealous of its influence on money bills ; finally, on the eighth 
 of September, it was settled that, while all bills for raising 
 revenue should originate in the house of representatives, the 
 senate might propose or concur with amendments as on other 
 bills.* 
 
 On the same day, just before the adjournment, Williamson 
 strove to increase the number of the first house of representa- 
 tives ; and was seconded by Madison. Hamilton spoke with 
 earnestness and anxiety for the motion. " I am," said he, " a 
 friend to a vigorous government ; at the same time I hold it 
 essential that the popular branch of the government should 
 rest on a broad foundation. The house of representatives is on 
 so narrow a scale as to warrant a jealousy in the people for their 
 
 * Gilpin, 740, 1218, 1295, 1612; Elliot, 130, 374, 409, 561. 
 
 f Gilpin, 734, 861, 1141, 1241,1621 ; Elliot, 128, 190, 333, 381, 564. 
 i Gilpin, 1481 ; Elliot, 504. 
 
 * GUpin, 1494, 1530, 1531 ; Elliot, 510, 529 ; Elliot, i., 285, 294, 295. 
 
1787. THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY. 355 
 
 liberties. The connection between the president and the senate 
 will tend to perpetuate him by corrupt influence; on this 
 account a numerous representation in the other branch of the 
 legislature should be estabhshed." The motion was lost by one 
 majority ; Pennsylvania and the four states nearest her on the 
 south being outvoted by ISTew Jersey and the JSTew England states 
 at one extreme, and South CaroHna and Georgia at the other.* 
 It remained to mark out the way in which the new consti- 
 tution should be ratified. The convention had shown a dis- 
 inchnation to ask for it the approbation of congress. Hamilton 
 saw in the omission an indecorum, and made the rash motion 
 that congress, if they should agree to the constitution, should 
 transmit it for ratification to the legislatures of the several 
 states. Gerry seconded him.f Wilson strongly disapproved 
 " the suspending the plan of the convention on the approbation 
 of congress." He declared it worse than folly to rely on the 
 concurrence of the Hhode Island members of congress. Mary- 
 land had voted, on the floor of the convention, for requiring the 
 unanimous assent of the thirteen states to the change in the 
 federal system ; for a long time New York had not been rep- 
 resented ; deputies from other states had spoken against the 
 plan. " Can it then be safe to make the assent of congress 
 necessary ? We are ourselves, at the close, throwing insuper- 
 able obstacles in the way of its success." J Clymer thought 
 the proposed mode would fetter and embarrass congress ; and 
 King and Eutledge concurring with him, Hamilton's motion 
 was supported only by Connecticut.* It was then voted, in 
 the words of the report of the committee of detail : " This con- 
 stitution shall be laid before the United States in congress 
 assembled ; and it is the opinion of this convention that it should 
 be afterward submitted to a convention chosen in each state, 
 under the recommendation of its legislature, in order to receive 
 the ratiflcation of such convention." In substance this method 
 was never changed ; in form it was removed from the constitu- 
 tion and imbodied in a directory resolution. | 
 
 * Gilpin, 1533; Elliot, 530. f Gilpin, 1539; Elliot, 533. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1540 ; Elliot,- 534. # Gilpin, 1541 ; Elliot, 534. 
 
 II Art. xxii. of draft of the constitution submitted to the committee of revi- 
 sion, September 10th. Gilpin, 1570 ; Elliot, 541. 
 
356 THE FEDEEAL CONVENTION b. iii. ; ch. x. 
 
 Eandolpli now began to speak of the constitution as a plan 
 wliicli would end in tyranny ; and proposed tliat the state con- 
 ventions, on receiving it, should have power to adopt, reject, 
 or amend it ; after which another general convention should 
 meet with full power to adopt or reject the proposed altera- 
 tions, and to establish finally the government. Frankhn sec- 
 onded the motion.* Out of respect to its authors, the pro- 
 position was allowed to remain on the table ; but by a unani- 
 mous vote it was ordered that the constitution should be 
 established on its ratification by the conventions of nine states.f 
 Finally, a committee of five was appointed to revise its style 
 and the arrangement of its articles. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1542; Elliot, 535. f Gilpin, 1571 ; Elliot, 541. 
 
1787. THE LAST DAYS OF THE CONVENTION. 357 
 
 CHAPTEE XL 
 
 the last days of the conventiolsr. 
 
 September 12 to September 17, 1787. 
 
 The committee to whom tlie constitution was referred for 
 tlie arrangement of its articles and the revision of its style 
 were Johnson, Hamilton, Gouverneur Morris, Madison, and 
 King. The final draft of the instrument was written by Gou- 
 verneur Morris,* who laiew how to reject redundant and equiv- 
 ocal expressions, and to use language with clearness and vigor ; 
 but the convention itself had given so minute, long-continued, 
 and oft-renewed attention to every phrase in every section, 
 that there scarcely remained room for improvement except in 
 the distribution of its parts. 
 
 Its first words are : " We the people of the United States, 
 in order to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, en- 
 sure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defence, 
 promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty 
 to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this con- 
 stitution for the United States of America." Here is no tran- 
 sient compact between parties : it is the institution of govern- 
 ment by an act of the highest sovereignty ; the decree of many 
 who are yet one ; their law of laws, inviolably supreme, and 
 not to be changed except in the way which their forecast has 
 provided. 
 
 The names of the thirteen states, so carefully enumerated in 
 the declaration of independence and in the treaty of peace, were 
 omitted, because the constitution was to go into effect on its 
 acceptance by nine of them, and the states by which it would 
 
 * G. Morris to T. Pickering, 22 December 1814, in Life by Sparks, iii., 323. 
 
358 THE FEDERAL COITVENTIOK b. m. ; en. xi. 
 
 be ratified could not be foreknown. Tlie deputies in the con- 
 vention, representing but eleven states, did not pretend to be 
 " the people ; " and could not institute a general government 
 in its name. The instrument which they framed was like the 
 report of a bill beginning with the words " it is enacted," though 
 the binding enactment awaits the will of the legislature; or 
 Kke a deed drawn up by an attorney for several parties, and 
 awaiting its execution by the principals themselves. Only by 
 its acceptance could the words " vf e the people of the United 
 States " become words of truth and power. 
 
 The phrase "general weKare," * adopted from the articles 
 of confederation, though seemingly vague, was employed in a 
 rigidly restrictive sense to signify " the concerns of the union 
 at large, not the particular policy of any state." f The word 
 "national" was excluded from the constitution, because it 
 might seem to present the idea of the union of the people with- 
 out at the same time bringing into view that the one republic 
 was formed out of many states. Toward foreign powers the 
 country presented itseK as one nation. 
 
 The arrangement of the articles and sections is faultless ; 
 the style of the whole is nearly so. The branches of the legis- 
 lature are definitively named senate and house of represen- 
 tatives, the senate, at last, having precedence ; the two together 
 take the historic name of congress. 
 
 The veto of the president could still be overmled only by 
 three fourths of each branch of congress ; the majority of the 
 convention, fearing lest so large a requisition would impose 
 too great a difficulty in repeahng bad laws, J at this last mo- 
 ment substituted the vote of two thirds. 
 
 "Williamson pointed out the necessity of providing for 
 juries in civil cases. " It is not possible," said Gorham, " to 
 discriminate equity cases from those in which juries would be 
 proper; and the matter may safely be trusted to the repre- 
 sentatives of the people." * Gerry urged the necessity of juries 
 as a safeguard against corrupt judges. " A general principle 
 laid down on this and some other points would be sufficient," 
 
 * Gilpin, 1543; Elliot, 558. 
 
 \ Washington to William Gordon, 8 July 1183. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1563 ; Elliot, 537. * Gilpin, 15G5 ; Elliot, 538. 
 
1787. THE LAST DAYS OF THE CONYEI^TIOISr. 359 
 
 said Mason, and he joined with Gerry in moving for a bill of 
 rights. 
 
 The declaration of American independence, by the truths 
 which it announced, called forth sympathy in all parts of the 
 world. Could the constitution of the United States have been 
 accompanied by a like solemn declaration of the principles on 
 which it rested, the states would have been held together by 
 the holiest and strongest bonds.* But the motion was lost 
 by the unanimous vote of ten states, Massachusetts being ab- 
 sent, and Ehode Island and 'New York not represented. 
 
 The style of the executive, as silently carried forward from 
 the committee of detail, was still " his Excellency ; " this van- 
 ished in the committee of revision, so that he might be known 
 only as the president of the United States. 
 
 Following a precedent of the first congress. Mason, on the 
 thirteenth, seconded by Johnson, moved for a committee to 
 report articles of association for encouraging economy, fru- 
 gality, and American manufactures. f It was adopted without 
 debate and without opposition. The proposal was referred 
 to Mason, Franklin, Dickinson, Johnson, and William Living- 
 ston ; but they made no report. 
 
 From the work of the committee of detail the word " ser- 
 vitude " survived as applied to the engagement to labor for a 
 term of years ; on the motion of Randolph the word " service " 
 
 * Here manuscripts and printed texts differ in an astonishing manner. 
 
 Text of Madison in Elliot^ «., 306. 
 It was moved and seconded to appoint a committee to prepare a bill of rights ; 
 which passed unanimously in the negative. 
 
 Manuscript of Madison. 
 On the question for a committee to prepare a bill of rights — 
 N. H. no, Mas. abst., Ct. no, N. J. no, Pa. no, Del. no, Md. no, Ya. no, N. C. 
 no, S. C. no, Geo. no. 
 
 Text of Madison in Gilpin^ 1566; in Elliot, 538. 
 On the question for a committee to prepare a bill of rights — 
 New Hampshire, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, aye — 5 ; 
 Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, no — 5 ; Massachu- 
 setts, absent. 
 
 The manuscript of Madison, which is plainly written, represents the motion 
 as negatived unanimously ; the printed edition, as lost by a purely geographical 
 division. The change remains as yet a mystery. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1568 ; Elliot, 540. 
 
360 THE FEDERAL CONVENTION. b. hi. ; ch. xi. 
 
 was iinanimously substituted for it, servitude being tliougbt to 
 express the condition of slaves, service an obligation of free 
 persons."^ 
 
 On tlie same day Jolinson, from the committee on style, 
 reported t resolutions for the ratification of the constitution 
 through congress by conventions of the people of the several 
 states ; and then for the election of senators, representatives, 
 and electors, and through them of president. I^Tothing was 
 omitted to make it certain that at a fixed time and place the 
 government under the constitution would start into being. 
 
 On the fourteenth it was confirmed without dissent that 
 congress should have no right to change the places of the elec- 
 tion of senators. 
 
 The appointment of the treasurer as the keeper of the 
 purse had thus far been jealously reserved to the two houses 
 of congress. J It marks the confidence of the convention in 
 its own work, that at this period the selection of that officer 
 was confided to the president and senate. 
 
 On the same day Franklin, seconded by Wilson, moved to 
 add, after the authority to establish post-offices and post-roads, 
 a power " to provide for cutting canals." * " The expense," ob- 
 jected Sherman, " will fall on the United States, and the bene- 
 fit accrue to the places where the canals are cut." ".Canals," 
 replied \Yilson, "instead of being an expense to the United 
 States, may be made a source of revenue." Madison, sup- 
 ported by Randolph, suggested an enlargement of the motion 
 into a warrant to grant charters of incorporation which might 
 exceed the legislative provisions of individual states, and yet 
 be required by the interest of the United States; political 
 obstacles to an easy communication between the states being 
 removed, a removal of natural ones ought to follow. The 
 necessity of the power was denied by King. " It is necessa- 
 ry," answered "Wilson, " to prevent a state from obstructing the 
 general welfare." " The states," rejoined King, " will be di- 
 vided into parties to grant charters of incorporation, in Phila- 
 delphia and New York to a bank, in other places to mercantile 
 
 * Gilpin, 1233, 1544, 15G9 ; Elliot, 3T9, 540, 559. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1570, 1571 ; Elliot, 541. 
 
 X Gilpin, 15'74; Elliot, 542. « Gilpin, 1576 ; Elliot, 543. 
 
1787. THE LAST DAYS OF THE CONVENTION". 361 
 
 monopolies." Wilson mentioned the importance of facilitat- 
 ing by canals the communication with the western settlements. 
 The motion, even when limited to the case of canals, gained 
 no votes but those of Pennsylvania, Yirginia, and Georgia.'^"" 
 
 Madison and Charles Pinckney asked for congress permis- 
 sion to establish a university in which no preferences should 
 be allowed on account of religion. " The exclusive power of 
 congress at the seat of government will reach the object," said 
 Gouverneur Morris. The motion was sustained only by Penn- 
 sylvania, Yirginia, and ]S"orth and South Carolina ; in Connec- 
 ticut, Johnson divided against Sherman. f 
 
 In framing the constitution, Madison kept in mind that the 
 functions of the general government should extend to the 
 prevention of " trespasses of the states on the rights of each 
 other." :j: " The rights of individuals," he said in the conven- 
 tion, " are infringed by many of the state laws, such as issuing 
 paper money, and instituting a mode to discharge debts diifer- 
 ing from the form of the contract." ^ It has already been 
 told how the delegates from Connecticut had agreed among 
 themselves, " that the legislatures of the individual states ought 
 not to possess a right to make any laws for the discharge of 
 contracts in any manner different from the agreement of the 
 parties." || Stringent clauses in the constitution already pro- 
 hibited paper money. For the rest. King, as we have seen, 
 proposed a clause forbidding the states to interfere in private 
 contracts; but the motion had been condemned as reaching 
 too far ; and instead of it, at the instance of Rutledge, the con- 
 vention denied to the states the power " to pass bills of attain- 
 der or fa?j9(952^y«cz'(? laws." "^ In this manner it was supposed 
 that laws for closing the courts, or authorizing the debtor to 
 pay his debts by more convenient instalments than he had 
 covenanted for, were effectually prohibited. But Dickinson, 
 as we have seen, after consulting Blackstone, mentioned to 
 the house that the term ex post facto related to criminal 
 
 * Gilpin, 1576, 1577; Elliot, 544. f Gilpin, 1577, 157S ; Elliot, 544. 
 :}: Madison, i., 321. 
 
 # Yates's Minutes, Elliot, i., 424, 425. Compare Gilpin, 898 ; Elliot, 20a 
 II Sherman by J. Evarts in Biography of the Signers, ii., 43. 
 
 ^Elliot, i., 271. 
 
362 THE FEDERAL CO:&TYENTIOK b. iii. ; oh. xi. 
 
 cases only; and that restraint of the states from retrospec- 
 tive law in civil cases would require some further provision.* 
 Before an explanatory provision had been made, the section 
 came into the liands of the committee on revision and style. 
 That committee had no authority to bring forward any new 
 proposition, but only to make corrections of style. Gouver- 
 neur Morris retained the clause forbidding ex post facto laws; 
 and, resolute not " to countenance the issue of paper money and 
 the consequent violation of contracts," f he of himself added 
 the words : " Ko state shall pass laws altering or impairing the 
 obligation of contracts." The convention reduced the explan- 
 atory words to the shorter form : " No state shall pass any law 
 impairing the obligation of contracts." J In this manner an 
 end was designed to be made to barren land laws, laws for the 
 instalment of debts, and laws closing the courts against suitors. 
 
 On the fifteenth, from fresh information, it appeared to 
 Sherman that !N"orth Carolina was entitled to another represen- 
 tative ; and Langdon moved to allow one more member to that 
 state, and likewise one more to Rhode Island.* " If Rhode 
 Island is to be allowed two members," said King, " I can never 
 sign the constitution." 
 
 Charles Pinckney urged separately the just claim of l!Torth 
 Carolina ; on which Bedford put in a like claim for Rhode 
 Island and for Delaware; and the original proposition was 
 hopelessly defeated. || 
 
 Randolph and Madison disliked leaving the pardon for 
 treason to the president alone ; but the convention would not 
 suffer the legislature or the senate to share that power. ''^ 
 
 The committee of revision had described a fugitive slave as 
 " a person legally held to service or labor in one state." The 
 language seemed to imply that slavery was a " legal " condition ; 
 the last word of the convention relating to the subject defined 
 the fugitive slave to be " a person held to service or labor in 
 one state under the laws thereof," making it clear that, in the 
 meaning of the constitution, slavery was local and not federal.^ 
 
 * Gilpin, 1450 ; Elliot, 488. * Gilpin, 1583 ; Elliot, 547. 
 
 f G. Morris by Sparks, iii., 323. |i Gilpin, 1583, 1584 ; Elliot, 64'7. 
 
 i Gilpin, 1552, 1581 ; Elliot, 546, 561. ^ Gilpin, 1587 ; Elliot, 549. 
 
 ^ Gilpin, 1558, 1589, 1620; Elliot, 650, 564. 
 
1787. THE LAST DAYS OF THE CONVENTION. 363 
 
 The convention gave tlie last touches to the modes of 
 amending the constitution. In August the committee of detail 
 had reported that, " on the application of the legislatures of 
 two thirds of the states in the union, the legislature of the 
 United States shall call a convention for that purpose." * On 
 the thirtieth day of August, Gouverneur Morris had suggested 
 that congress " should be at liberty to call a convention when- 
 ever it pleased." f "An easier mode of introducing amend- 
 ments," said Hamilton, reviving the question, "is desirable. 
 The state legislatures will not apply for alterations but with a 
 view to increase their own powers. The national legislature 
 will be the first to perceive the necessity of amendments ; and 
 on the concurrence of each branch ought to be empowered to 
 call a convention, reserving the final decision to the people." J 
 Madison supported Hamilton. 
 
 Here Sherman suggested an alternative: the legislature 
 may propose amendments directly to the several states, not to 
 be binding until consented to by them all.* " To be binding 
 when consented to by two thirds of the several states," inter- 
 posed Wilson. To facilitate amendments, the convention au- 
 thorized two thirds of congress to introduce amendments to 
 the constitution ; but, to prevent hasty changes, required for 
 their ratification the assent of three fourths of the legislatures 
 or conventions of the states. 
 
 Madison, summing up the ideas that had found favor, 
 moved that the legislature of the United States, upon a vote of 
 two thirds of both houses, or upon the application of two 
 thirds of the legislatures of the states, shall propose amend- 
 ments to the constitution which shall be valid when they shall 
 have been ratified by three fourths at least of the several states 
 in their legislatures or conventions, as one or the other mode 
 of ratification may be proposed by the legislature of the United 
 States. II 
 
 This motion was accepted, but not till it had been agreed 
 that the clauses in the constitution forming special covenants 
 with the South on slavery should not be liable to change. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1241 ; Elliot, 381. « Gilpin, 1535 ; Elliot, 631. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1468 ; Elliot, 498. | Ibid. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1534; Elliot, £31. 
 
364: THE FEDEEAL CONVENTION". b. hi. ; ch. xi. 
 
 Five days later the fears of tlie small states were quieted by a 
 proviso that no state mthoiit its own consent should ever be 
 deprived of its equality in the senate.* 
 
 Finally, on maturest reflection, the proposition of the com- 
 mittee of detail, obliging congress to call a convention on ap- 
 plication of two thirds of the states, was restored. Amend- 
 ments to the constitution might proceed from the people as 
 represented in the legislatures of the states ; or from the peo- 
 ple as represented in congress ; or from the people as present 
 in a convention ; in every case to be valid only with the assent 
 of three fourths of the states. 
 
 Mason, in sullen discontent at the grant of power to a bare 
 majority of congress to pass navigation acts, and dreading that 
 " a few rich merchants in Philadelphia, j^ew York, and Bos- 
 ton" might by that means monopolize the staples of the south- 
 ern states and reduce their value perhaps fifty per cent, moved 
 " that no law in the nature of a navigation act be passed before 
 the year eighteen hundred and eight, without the consent of 
 two thirds of each branch of the legislature ; " but he was sup- 
 ported only by Maryland, Virginia, and Georgia. f 
 
 ISText, Randolph, whose weight as governor of Yirginia 
 might turn the scale in that state, declared his intention to 
 withhold his signature from the constitution that he miglit re- 
 tain freedom as to his ultimate action ; and, agreeing exactly 
 with Ricliard Henry Lee, :[ he moved " that state conventions 
 might have the power to offer to the constitution which was to 
 be laid before them as many amendments as they pleased ; and 
 that these amendments, together with the constitution, should 
 be submitted to another general convention " * for a final de- 
 cision. He was seconded by Mason, who said : " The govern- 
 ment as established by the constitution will surely end either 
 in monarchy or a tyrannical aristocracy. As it now stands, I 
 can neither give it my support in Yirginia, nor sign it here. 
 With the expedient of another convention I could sign." || 
 
 " I, too," said Charles Pinckney, " object to the power of 
 a majority of congress over commerce ; but, apprehending the 
 
 * Gilpin, 1592 ; Elliot, 552. | Gilpin, 1593 ; Elliot, 552. 
 
 t Compare R. II. Lee to Chancellor Pendleton, 22 May 1783, in Life, ii., 93, 94. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1593 ; Elliot, 552. || Gilpin, 1591 ; Elliot, 552, 553. 
 
1787. THE LAST DAYS OF THE CONVENTION". 365 
 
 danger of a general confusion and an ultimate decision by the 
 sword, I shall give the ])lan my support." Then Gerry counted 
 up eight objections to the constitution, " all " of which he 
 could yet get over, were it not that the legislature had general 
 power to make " necessary and proper " laws, to raise " armies 
 and money " without limit, and to establish " a star chamber 
 as to civil cases ; " and he, too, contended for a second general 
 convention. 
 
 On the proposition for another convention all the states 
 answered " ISTo." Washington then put the question of agree- 
 ing to the constitution in its present form ; and all the states 
 present answered " Aye." The constitution was then ordered 
 to be engrossed, and late on the evening of Saturday the house 
 adjourned.* 
 
 One morning Washington, in a desultory conversation with 
 members of the convention before the chair was taken, observed 
 how unhappy it would be should any of them oppose the sys- 
 tem when they returned to their states.f On Monday, the 
 seventeenth of September, Franklin made a last effort to win 
 over the dissenting members. " Mr. President," said he, " sev- 
 eral parts of this constitution I do not at present approve, but 
 I am not sure I shall never approve them. It astonishes me to 
 find this system approaching so near to perfection. I consent 
 to this constitution because I e:q)ect no better, and because I 
 am not sure that it is not the best. The opinions I have had 
 of its errors I sacrifice to the public good. 
 
 " On the whole, sir, I cannot help expressing a wish that 
 every member of the convention, who may still have objections 
 to it, would with me on this occasion doubt a little of his own 
 infallibility, and, to manifest our unanimity, put his name to 
 this instrument." J He then moved that the constitution be 
 signed by the members ; and he offered as the form of signa- 
 ture a simple testimony that the constitution had received " the 
 unanimous consent of the states present." * But this ample 
 concession induced neither Mason, nor Gerry, nor Eandolph 
 to relent. 
 
 * Gilpin, 1595; Elliot, 553. 
 
 •f Luther Martin in Maiyland Journal of 21 March 1788. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1597, 1598; Elliot, 554, 555. ^Gilpin, 1598; Elliot, 555. 
 
366 THE FEDERAL CONYENTIOK b. iii. ; oh. xi. 
 
 Before the question was put, Gorham, obeying an intima- 
 tion from Washington, proposed to render the house of repre- 
 sentatives a more popular body by allowing one member for 
 every thirty thousand inhabitants. He was warmly seconded 
 by King and Carroll.* 
 
 Hising to put the question, the president, after an apology 
 for offering his sentiments, said : " I would make objections to 
 the plan as few as possible. The smallness of the number of 
 representatives has been considered by many members as in- 
 sufficient security for the rights and interests of the people ; 
 and to myseK has always appeared exceptionable ; late as is the 
 moment, it will give me much satisfaction to see the amend- 
 ment adopted." f And at his word it was adopted unani- 
 mously. 
 
 On the question to agree to the engrossed constitution, all 
 the states answered " Aye." J 
 
 Kandolph then apologized for refusing to sign the constitu- 
 tion, "notwithstanding the vast majority and the venerable 
 names which gave sanction to its wisdom and its worth. I do 
 not mean by this refusal," he continued, " to decide that I shall 
 oppose the constitution without doors ; I mean only to keep 
 myself free to be governed by my duty, as it shall be prescribed 
 by my future judgment." * 
 
 " I, too, had objections," said Gouverneur Morris ; " but con- 
 sidering the present plan the best that can be attained, I shall 
 take it with all its faults. The moment it goes forth, the 
 great question will be : ' Shall there be a national government, 
 or a general anarchy ? ' " 
 
 " I am anxious," said Hamilton, "that every member should 
 sign. A few by refusing may do infinite mischief. No man's 
 ideas are more remote from the plan than my own are known 
 to be; but is it possible to deliberate between anarchy and 
 convulsion on the one side, and the chance of good to be ex- 
 pected from the plan on the other ? " || 
 
 " I," said Gerry, " fear a civil war. In Massachusetts there 
 are two parties : one devoted to democracy, the worst, I think, 
 of all political evils ; the other as violent in the opposite ex- 
 
 * Gilpin, 1599 ; Elliot, 555. f Gilpin, 1599, 1600; Elliot, 556, 566. 
 
 X Gilpin, 1600 ; Elliot, 556. # Ibid. || Gilpin, 1601 ; Elliot, 556. 
 
1787. THE LAST DAYS OF THE COITYENTION. 367 
 
 treme. From tlie collision of these, confusion is greatlj to be 
 feared." 
 
 " I shall sign the constitution with a view to support it with 
 all my influence," said Cotesworth Pinclmey, " and I wish to 
 pledge myself accordingly." ^ Jared IngersoU of Pennsyl- 
 vania considered the signing as a recommendation of what, all 
 things considered, was the most eligible. 
 
 The form proposed by Franklin was accepted with no dis- 
 sent, except that South Carolina was impatient at its want of 
 an affirmative expression of unhesitating approval. The jour- 
 nals and papers of the convention were confided to the care of 
 the president, subject to the order of the new government when 
 it should be formed. f Hamilton successively inscribed on the 
 great sheet of parchment the name of each state as the dele- 
 gations one after the other came forward in geographical order 
 and signed the constitution. When it appeared that the unani- 
 mous consent of all the eleven states present in convention was 
 recorded in its favor, Franklin, looking toward a sun which 
 was blazoned on the president's chair, said of it to those near 
 him: "In the vicissitudes of hope and fear I was not able to 
 tell whether it was rising or setting ; now I know that it is the 
 rising sun." J 
 
 The members were awe-struck at the result of their coun-'. 
 cils ; the constitution was a nobler work than any one of them/ 
 had believed it possible to devise. They all on that day dined 
 together, and took a cordial leave of each other. "Washington 
 at an early hour of the evening retired " to meditate on the 
 momentous work which had been executed." * 
 
 * Gilpin, 1603, 1604 ; Elliot, 557, 558. t Gilpin, 1624 ; Elliot, 565. 
 
 f Gilpin, 1605 ; Elliot, 558. * Diarj of Washington for the day. 
 
THE 
 
 FOMATIOX OF THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 UNITED STATES OF AMEEIOA 
 
 /iVr FIVE BOOKS. 
 
 BOOK FOURTH. 
 
 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATES IN" JUDGMENT ON THE 
 CO:t^STITUTION'. 
 
 1787-1^ 
 
 VOL. VI. — 24 
 
CHAPTER I. 
 
 the constitution in congress and in vieginia. 
 Septe:mbek to Novei^iber 1787. 
 
 On the twentieth of September the letter of the president 
 of the convention to the president of congress, the full text of 
 the proposed constitution, and the order of the convention, 
 were laid before congress, and on the next day appeared in 
 tlie daily papers of 'New York. 
 
 The letter of Washington said : The powers necessary to 
 be vested in " the general government of the union " are too 
 extensive to be delegated to " one body of men." '' It is im- 
 practicable, in the federal government of these states, to secure 
 all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide 
 for the interest and safety of all ; it is difficult to draw with 
 precision the line between those rights which must be sur- 
 rendered and those which may be reserved ; on the present 
 occasion this difficulty was increased by a difference among 
 the several states as to their situation, extent, habits, and par- 
 ticular interests. We kept steadily in view the consolida- 
 tion of our union, in which is involved our prosperity, felicity, 
 safety, perhaps our national existence. And thus the consti- 
 tution which we now present is the result of that mutual def- 
 erence and concession which the peculiarity of our political 
 situation rendered indispensable." 
 
 The constitution instantly met with opposition from the in- 
 defatigable Richard Henry Lee,* supported by Nathan Dane f 
 and all the delegates from ISTew York, of whom Melancthon 
 
 * Carrington to Madison, Sunday, 23 September IVSY. 
 f Gilpin^ 643, 650; Elliot, 506, 568. 
 
372 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION", b. iv.;oh.i. 
 
 Smith, was the ablest. Till Madison returned, the delegates 
 from Yirginia were equally divided, Grayson opposing the 
 government because it was too feeble, and Lee because it was 
 too strong.* Already the JS'ew York faction was actively 
 scattering the seeds of opposition, and Hamilton dauntlessly 
 opposing them in the public papers by arguments for union, f 
 
 It was only out of the ashes of the confederation that the 
 new constitution could spring into being ; and the letter of the 
 convention did indeed invite congress to light its own funeral 
 pyre. On the twenty-sixth it was first contended that con- 
 gress could not properly give any positive countenance to a 
 measure subversive of the confederation to which they owed 
 their existence. To this it was answered, that in February 
 congress itself had recommended the convention as " the most 
 probable means of establishing a firm national government," 
 and that it was not now more restrained from acceding to the 
 new plan than the convention from proposing it. If the plan 
 was within the powers of the convention, it was within those of 
 congress ; if beyond those powers, the necessity which justified 
 the one would justify the other ; and the necessity existed if 
 any faith was due to the representations of congress them- 
 selves, confirmed by twelve states in the union and by the gen- 
 eral voice of the people. 
 
 Lee next attempted to amend the act of the convention be- 
 fore it should go forth from congress to the people. " Where," 
 said he, " is the contract between the nation and the govern- 
 ment? The constitution makes mention only of those who 
 govern, and nowhere speaks of the rights ^of the people who 
 are governed." :j: He wished to qualify the immense power of 
 the government by a bill of rights, which had always been re- 
 garded as the palladium of a free people. The bill of rights 
 was to relate to the rights of conscience, the freedom of the 
 press, the trial by jury in civil cases as well as criminal, tlie 
 prohibition of standing armies, freedom of elections, the inde- 
 pendence of the judges, security against excessive bails, fines, 
 or punishments, against unreasonable searches or seizure of 
 
 * Carrington to Jefferson, 23 October 1787. 
 
 •f Carrington to Madison, 23 September 1787. 
 
 X Minister Otto to Count Montmorin, New York, 23 October 1787. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN CONGRESS. 373 
 
 persons, houses, papers, or property ; and tlie right of petition. 
 He further proposed amendments to the constitution ; a coun- 
 cil of state or privy council, to be joined with the president in 
 the appointment of all officers, so as to prevent the blending 
 of legislative and executive powers ; no vice-president ; an in- 
 crease of the number of the representatives ; and the requisi- 
 tion of more than a majority to make commercial regulations. 
 
 The restraint on the power of regulating commerce and 
 navigation would have been fatal to the wealth and prosperity 
 of 'New York. J^evertheless, the propositions of Lee were 
 supported by Melancthon Smith, who insisted that congress 
 had the undoubted right and the duty to amend the plan of 
 the federal constitution, in which the essential safeguards of 
 liberty had been omitted. To this it was replied that congress 
 had certainly a right of its own to propose amendments, but 
 that these must be addressed to the legislatures of the states, 
 and would require ratification by all the thirteen ; but that the 
 act of the federal convention was to be addressed to conven- 
 tions of the several states, of which any nine might adopt it 
 for themselves. So the first day's debate ended without ad- 
 mitting the proposed amendments to consideration.* 
 
 The next day Lee, seconded by Smith, offered a resolution 
 that congress had no power whatever to assist f in creating a 
 " new confederacy of nine " states ; and therefore he would do 
 no more than, as a mark of respect, forward the acts of the 
 convention to the executives of every state to be laid before 
 their respective legislatures. On the instant Abraham Clarke 
 of New Jersey, seconded by Nathaniel Mitchell of Delaware, 
 proposed to add : " In order to be by them submitted to con- 
 ventions of delegates to be chosen agreeably to the said resolu- 
 tions of the convention." On the question, Georgia and the 
 two Carolinas voted unanimously against Lee ; so did Dela- 
 ware and the only member from Maryland, with Pennsylvania, 
 New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire. 
 Virginia, on the return of Madison, joined them by the in- 
 flexible majority of Madison, Carrington, and Henry Lee, 
 
 * Madison to Washington, New York, 30 September 1787 ; R. H. Lee to Sam- 
 uel Adams, New York, 5 October 1787 ; Life of R. H. Lee, ii., 74, 76. 
 f Gilpin, 643 ; Elliot, 566. 
 
371 THE STATES RATIFY THE C0:N'STITUTI0N. B.iv.;cn.i. 
 
 against Grajson and Eichard Henry Lee. All the states ex- 
 cept 'New York were for tlie motion; and all except New 
 York and Yirginia were unanimously so. The majority in 
 congress was impatient to express its approval of the acts of 
 the convention in still stronger language ; Carrington of Yir- 
 ginia, therefore, seconded by Bingham of Pennsylvania, pro- 
 posed that it be recommended to the legislatures of the several 
 states to cause conventions to be held as speedily as may be, to 
 the end that the same may be adopted, ratified, and confirmed.* 
 
 In this stage of the business congress adjourned. The 
 friends of the new constitution desired to send it to the states 
 by the unanimous vote of congress. The members from New 
 York would not consent to any language that implied approval. 
 To win their vote the resolution of congress must be neutral. 
 On the other hand, the idea of unanimity required the efiiace- 
 ment of every motion adverse to the reference of the consti- 
 tution. Accordingly, congress, when it next assembled, ex- 
 punged from its journal the proposed amendments of Richard 
 Henry Lee, and the vote of the preceding day ; f and having 
 obliterated every record of opposition, it resolved on the 
 twenty-eighth unanimously, eleven states being present, Mary- 
 land having one delegate, Rhode Island alone being altogether 
 unrepresented, that the said report, with the resolutions and 
 letter accompanying the same, be transmitted to the several 
 legislatures, in order to be submitted to a convention of dele- 
 gates chosen in each state by the people thereof, in conformity 
 to the resolves of the convention. :j; 
 
 Bafiled within the convention, Richard Henry Lee appealed 
 to the world through the press in a series of " Letters from the 
 Federal Farmer," of which thousands of copies were scattered 
 through the central states. He acknowledged the necessity of 
 reforming the government, but claimed to discern a strong ten- 
 dency to aristocracy in every part of the proposed constitution, 
 which he slighted as the work of visionary young men,* bent 
 on changing the thirteen distinct independent republics under 
 a federal head into one consolidated government."^ He way- 
 
 * MS. Journals of Congress in S;;ate Department. 
 
 f MS. Journals of Congress. * Letters from tlie Federal Farmer, 8. 
 
 :}: Journals of Congress, iv., '782. ^ Letters from the Federal Farmer, 6. 
 
nsr. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 375 
 
 laid Gerry when bound for home, and assisted him in prepar- 
 ing an official letter to explain his refusal to sign the constitu- 
 tion, lie addressed himself to Samuel Adams, the "dear 
 friend with whom he had long toiled in the vineyard of lib- 
 erty," submitting to his wisdom and patriotism the objections 
 to the new constitution which he had proposed in congress in 
 the form of amendments, but disingenuously substituting other 
 words for his remonstrance against vesting congress with 
 power to regulate commerce. He extended his intrigues to 
 Pennsylvania and Delaware, hoping to delay their decisions. 
 
 " I am waiting wdth anxiety for the echo from Virginia, 
 but with very faint hopes of its corresponding with my wishes," 
 wrote Madison from N^ew York city to Washington.* The 
 party in power in ISTew York was passionately opposed to the 
 constitution ; but already day had begun to scatter the dusk of 
 earliest morning. 
 
 In the first moment after his return to Mount Yernon, 
 Washington sent a copy of the constitution to Patrick IIenry,f 
 to Harrison, and to Nelson, each of whom had been governor 
 of Virginia. In a propitiatory letter he appealed to their ex- 
 perience of the difficulties which had ever arisen in attempts to 
 reconcile the interests and local prejudices of the several states. 
 " I wish," he continued, " the constitution which is offered had 
 been more perfect ; but it is the best that could be obtained at 
 this time, and a door is opened for amendments hereafter. 
 The political concerns of this country are suspended by a 
 thread. The convention has been looked up to by the reflect- 
 ing part of the community with a solicitude which is hardly to 
 be conceived ; and if nothing had been agreed on by that body, 
 anarchy would soon have ensued, the seeds being deeply sown 
 in every soil." 
 
 A visitor at Mount Vernon, just after this letter was sent 
 out, writes of Washington : " He is in perfect health, and looks 
 almost as well as he did twenty years ago. I never in my life 
 saw him so keen for anything as he is for the adoption of the 
 new form of government." J Throughout the whole country he 
 
 * Madison to Washington. Gilpin, 646 ; Elliot, 567. 
 
 f Washington to Henry, 24 September 1181. Sparks, ix., 265. 
 
 t A. DoualJ to Jclierscn, 12 November 1787. 
 
\\J^ 
 
 376 THE STATES EATIFY THE COI^STITUTIOK b. iv. ; on. i. 
 
 was the centre of interest ; in Yirginia of power. The leaders 
 of opposition answered him frankly, but with expressions of 
 deference and affection. 
 
 " The seeds of civil discord," replied Harrison, " are plenti- 
 fully sown in very many of the powers given, both to the presi- 
 dent and congress. If the constitution is carried into effect, 
 the states south of the Potomac will be little more than ap- 
 pendages to those to the nortWard of it. My objections 
 chiefly he against the unlimited powers of taxation, the regula- 
 tion of trade, and the jurisdictions that are to be established in 
 every state altogether independent of their laws. The sword 
 and such powers will, nay, must, sooner or later establish a 
 tyranny." * 
 
 Avowing very sincerely " the highest reverence " for Wash- 
 ington, Patrick Henry answered positively : " I cannot bring 
 my mind to accord with the proposed constitution." f 
 
 George Mason, who had rendered the highest and wisest 
 service in shaping the constitution, now from wounded pride 
 resisted his inmost convictions, enumerating to his old friend 
 his objections, of which the grant to congress of power to regu- 
 late commerce by a bare majority was the capital one. ;{: 
 
 I^ext Richard Henry Lee, professing himself " compelled 
 by irresistible conviction of mind to doubt about the new sys- 
 tem for federal government," wrote : " It is, sir, in consequence 
 of long reflection upon the nature of man and of government, 
 that I am led to fear the danger that will ensue to civil hberty 
 from the adoption of the new system in its j)resent form." 
 And, having at once fixed in his mind the plan on which resist- 
 ance to its adoption should be conducted, he avowed his wish 
 " that such amendments as would give security to the rights of 
 human nature and the discordant interests of the different parts 
 of this union might employ anotlier convention." * 
 
 But the influence of Washington outweighed them all. 
 He was embosomed in the affections and enshrined in the pride 
 of the people of Yirginia ; and in all their v/averings during 
 
 * Sparks, ix., 266, 267. Note. f Sparks, ix., 266. Note. 
 
 X George Mason to Washington, 7 October 1787. Sparks, ix., 267, 268. Note. 
 
 * R. H. Lee to Washington, New York, 11 October 1787. Letters to W., iv., 
 180, 181. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 377 
 
 tlie nine months following the federal convention he was the 
 anchor of the constitution. His neighbors of Alexandria to a 
 man agreed with him ; and Fairfax county unanimously in- 
 structed its representatives, of whom George Mason was one, 
 " that the peace, security, and ' prosperity of Yirginia and of 
 the United States depended on the speedy adoption of the 
 federal constitution." * ^. 
 
 In the close division of parties in the state it was of vital 
 importance to secure the influence of Edmund Eandolph, its 
 governor ; and his old military chief in due time received from 
 him an elaborate paper which he had prepared in the form of 
 an address to the speaker of the house of delegates. In this 
 letter, not yet pledging himself to the unconditional support 
 of the constitution, he avowed that he prized the intimate and 
 unshaken friendship of Washington and Madison as among 
 the happiest of all his acquisitions ; but added : '^ Dreadful as 
 the total dissolution of the union is to my mind, I entertain no 
 less horror at the thought of partial confederacies. The ut- 
 most limit of any partial confederacy which Yirginia could 
 expect to form would comprehend the three southern and her 
 nearest northern neighbor. But they, like ourselves, are di- 
 minished in their real force by the mixture of an unhappy 
 species of population." f 
 
 Monroe wrote to Madison that his " strong objections " to 
 the constitution " were overbalanced by the arguments in its 
 favor." :j: 
 
 The legislature of Yirginia was to hold its regular meeting 
 on the third Monday of October ; this year there was a quo- 
 rum on the first day of the session, which had not happened 
 since the revolution. 
 
 On the nineteenth the vote of congress transniitting the 
 constitution came before the house ; Patrick Henry, refus- 
 ing to make an issue where he would have met with de- 
 feat, declared that the constitution must go before a conven- 
 
 * Meeting of Fairfax county, Tuesday, 2 October 1787. Carey's Museum, ii., 
 892,393. 
 
 f Edmund Randolph to the speaker of the house of delegates of Yirginia, 10 
 October 1787. Elliot, i., 487. 
 
 I Monroe to Madison, 13 October 1787. 
 
378 THE STATES KATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; ch. i. 
 
 tion, as it transcended the power of the house to decide on 
 it.* 
 
 But when, on the twentj-fifth, Francis Corbin proposed 
 " a convention to be called according to the recommendation 
 of congress," Henry objected that under that limitation its 
 members " would have power to adopt or reject the new plan, 
 but not to propose amendments " of its " errors and defects." 
 His motion to give this power to the convention of the state 
 was seconded by Mason, w4io added : " I declare that from the 
 east of JS^ew Hampshire to the south of Georgia there is not a 
 man more fully convinced of the necessity of establishing 
 some general government than I am ; that I regard our perfect 
 union as the rock of our political salvation." f 
 
 After some debate, John Marshall of Richmond, conced- 
 ing the point as to " leaving the door open for amendments," "H^ 
 pleaded that the legislature should not seem to disapprove the 
 new federal government, and, for the form of the resolution, 
 proposed that " the new constitution should be laid before the 
 convention for their free and ample discussion." *•" This form 
 was silently accepted by Henry, while Mason declared "that 
 the house had no right to suggest anything to a body para- 
 mount to itself." The vote was unanimous, the form of the 
 resolution being that of Marshall, while in substance it yielded 
 up all that Henry and Mason required. [ From " unfriendly 
 intentions toward the constitution," ^ the choice of the conven- 
 tion was postponed till the court days in March, and its time of 
 meeting to the first Monday in June. Should many of the 
 states then be found against the constitution, Yirginia could 
 assume the office of mediator between contending parties, and 
 dictate to all the rest of the union. () 
 
 * Bushrod Washington to G. W., 19 October ITST. Sparks, ix., 273. 
 f Report of Debate in Packet, 10 November 1*787. 
 
 X Madison, i., .^68, 364. 
 
 * Report of the Debate from Penn. Packet, 10 Norember 17S7. 
 
 II Compare George Mason to G. ^Y., 6 November 1787, in Letters to G. W., iv., 
 190. Report of Debates in Penn. Packet, 10 November 1787. Buh;hrod Wash- 
 ington in Sparks, ix,, 287. 
 
 ^Edward CarHngton to T, Jefferson, 10 November 1787. Bushrod Wash- 
 ington was inexperienced, and at first judged the disposition of the legislature too 
 favorably ; Carrington had keener-eyed correspondents. 
 
 ^ Monroe to Madison, 7 February 1788. Carrington to Madison, 18 January 
 
1787. THE COI^STITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 379 
 
 Since amendments liad been unanimously authorized, it 
 seemed fair that any expense of an attempt to make them 
 should be provided for with the other charges of the conven- 
 tion.* A letter from Richard Henry Lee, a representative 
 from Yirginia in congress, to the governor of the common- 
 wealth, recommended, as a policy open to " no objection and 
 promising great safety and mucli good," f that amendments 
 adopted severally by the states should all be definitively re- 
 ferred to a second federal convention. 
 
 To carry out this policy, resolutions were on the last day of 
 IN'ovember introduced into the house, and supported by Henry 
 and Mason, pledging the general assembly to defray the ex- 
 pense of a deputy or deputies which the convention of the 
 commonwealth in the following June might think proper to 
 send to confer with a convention of any one or more of the 
 sister states, " as well as the allowance to be made to the depu- 
 ties to a federal convention, in case such a convention should 
 be judged necessary." The friends of the constitution, who 
 now perceived the direction in which they were drifting, made 
 a rally ; but they were beaten by a majority of about fifteen. 
 A bill pursuant to the resolutions, reported by a committee 
 composed mainly of the most determined " malcontents," soon 
 became a law. j^ Friends of the constitution who had been 
 jubilant at the first aspect of the legislature now doubted 
 whether it any longer had a majority in its favor ; its enemies 
 claimed a decisive victory. Early in December, Monroe re- 
 ported to Madison : " The cloud which hath hung over us for 
 some time past is not likely soon to be dispelled." * 
 
 But on Washington's mind no cloud rested. On the last 
 day of November he had replied to David Stuart of his own 
 state : " I am sorry to find by your favor that the opposition 
 gains strength. If there are characters who prefer disunion 
 or separate confederacies to the general government which is 
 offered to them, their opposition may, for aught I know, pro- 
 ceed from principle ; but as nothing, according to my concep- 
 tion of the matter, is more to be deprecated than a disunion or 
 
 1788. Washington to Carter, 14 December 1787, in Penn. Packet of 11 January 
 1788. * Sparks, ix., 287. f Lee's Life, ii., 81 ; Elliot, i., 505. 
 
 X Hening, xii., 462. * Monroe to Madison, 6 December. MS 
 
380 THE STATES EATIFY THE OONSTITUTIO]!^. b.iv.;ch.i. 
 
 three distinct confederacies, as far as my voice can go it shall 
 be offered in favor of the general government." * 
 
 l^OT did he lose heart or trust ; on the fourteenth of De- 
 cember, in a letter which soon reached the people of Virginia 
 through the newspapers, he wrote to Charles Carter of Freder- 
 icksburg : " I am pleased that the proceedings of the conven- 
 tion have met your approbation. My decided opinion on the 
 matter is that there is no alternative between the adoption of 
 it and anarchy. If one state, however important it may con- 
 ceive itself to be," and here he meant Yirginia, " or a minority 
 of them," meaning the five southernmost states, " should sup- 
 pose that they can dictate a constitution to the union, unless 
 they have the power of applying the ultima ratio to good 
 effect, they will find themselves deceived. All the opposition 
 to it that I have yet seen is addressed more to the passions 
 than to reason ; and clear I am, if another federal convention 
 is attempted, that the sentiments of the members will be more 
 discordant or less accommodating than the last. In fine, they 
 will agree upon no general plan. General government is now 
 suspended by a thread ; I might go further, and say it is really 
 at an end ; and what mil be the consequence of a fruitless at- 
 tempt to amend the one which is offered before it is tried, or 
 of the delay of the attempt, does not in my j^udgment need the 
 gift of prophecy to predict. 
 
 " I saw the imperfections of the constitution I aided in the 
 birth of before it was handed to the public ; but I am fully 
 persuaded it is the best that can be obtained at this time, that 
 it is free from many of the imperfections with which it is 
 charged, and that it or disunion is before us to choose from. 
 If the first is our election, when the defects of it are experi- 
 enced, a constitutional door is opened for amendments and may 
 be adopted in a peaceable manner, without tumult or disor- 
 der." f But as Yirginia has delayed her convention till June, 
 our narrative must turn to the states which were the first to 
 meet in convention. 
 
 * In Sparks, ix., 284, for " these distinct confederacies " read " three distinct 
 confederacies." 
 
 f Washington to Charles Carter, 14 December 1787, in Penn. Packet of 11 
 January 1788. The original draft of the letter is preserved in the State Department. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN PENNSYLVANIA. 381 
 
 CHAPTEE II. 
 
 the constitution in pennsylvania, delaware, and new 
 jersey ; and in georgia. 
 
 From 18 September 1787 to 2 January 1788. 
 
 Our liappy theme leads from one great act of universal in- 
 terest to another. A new era in the life of the race begins : a 
 people select their delegates to state conventions to pronounce 
 their judgment on the creation of a federal republic. 
 
 One more great duty to his fellow-citizens and to mankind 
 is to be fulfilled by Franklin ; one more honor to be won by 
 Philadelphia as the home of union ; one new victory by Penn- 
 sylvania as the citadel of the love of the one indivisible coun- 
 try. That mighty border commonwealth, extending its line 
 from Delaware bay to the Ohio, and holding convenient passes 
 through the Alleghanies, would not abandon the South, nor 
 the West, nor the North ; she would not hear of triple confed- 
 eracies nor of twin confederacies ; but only of one government 
 embracing all. Its people in their multifarious congruity had 
 nothing adverse to union ; the faithful of the proprietary party 
 were zealous for a true general government ; so too was every 
 man in public life of the people called Quakers ; * so was an 
 overwhelming majority of the Germans ; f so were the Bap- 
 tists, as indeed their synod authoritatively avowed for every 
 state. The perfect liberty of conscience prevented religious 
 differences from interfering with zeal for a closer union. 
 
 In the first period of the confederacy the inhabitants of 
 Philadelphia did not extend their plans for its reform beyond 
 the increase of its powers, but, after the flight of congress 
 
 r Independent Gazetteer, 15 January 1788. f Independent Gazetteer. 
 
382 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTIOK b. iv. ; oh. ii. 
 
 from their city, tliej began to say to one another that " it 
 would be more easy to build a new ship of state than to repair 
 the old one ; " that there was need of a new constitution with 
 a legislature in two branches. Merchants, bankers, holders of 
 the national debt, the army officers, found no party organized 
 against this opinion ; Dickinson was magnanimous enough to 
 become dissatisfied with the confederation which he had chiefly 
 assisted to frame ; and he and Mifflin and McKean and George 
 Clymer and Rush manifested no opposition to the policy of 
 Wilson, Eobert Morris, Gouverneur Morris, and Fitzsimons ; 
 although remoter counties, and especially the backwoodsmen 
 on each side of the mountains, loved their wild personal lib- 
 erty too dearly to welcome a new supreme control. 
 
 At eleven in the morning of the eighteenth, Benjamin 
 Franklin, then president of Pennsylvania, more than fourscore 
 years of age, fulfilling his last great public service, was ushered 
 into the hall of the assembly, followed by his seven colleagues 
 of the convention. After expressing in a short address their 
 iiope and belief that the measure recommended by that body 
 would produce happy effects to the commonwealth of Pennsyl- 
 vania as well as to every other of the United States, he pre- 
 sented the constitution and accompanying papers. 
 
 For the next ten days the house, not willing to forestall the 
 action of congress, confined itself to its usual business ; but as 
 it had resolved to adjourn si7ie die on Saturday, the twenty- 
 ninth, Clymer, on the morning of the last day but one of the 
 session, proposed to refer the acts of the federal convention to 
 a convention of the state. That there might be time for re- 
 flection, Robert Whitehill of Carlisle, on behalf of the minor- 
 ity, requested the postponement of the question at least until 
 the afternoon. This was conceded ; but in the afternoon the 
 minority, nineteen in number, did not attend, and refused to 
 obey the summons of the speaker delivered by the sergeant-at- 
 arms, so that no quorum could be made. This factious seces- 
 sion so enraged the inhabitants that early the next morning a 
 body of " respectable men " made a search for the delinquents ; 
 and finding two of them, just sufficient to form a house, dragged 
 them into the assembly, where, in spite of their protests, they 
 were compelled to stay. Meantime a fleet messenger, sent 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN PENNSYLVANIA. 383 
 
 from New York by William Bingham, a delegate in congress 
 from Pennsylvania, arrived with an authentic co2)y of a resolu- 
 tion of congress of the preceding day, unanimously recom- 
 mending the reference of the constitution to conventions of 
 the several states ; and within twenty hours * from the adop- 
 tion of the resolution, the Pennsylvania assembly called a con- 
 vention of the state for the third Tuesday in JSTovember.f 
 The vote was received by the spectators with three heartfelt 
 cheers ; the bells of the churches were rung ; and signs of 
 faith in the speedy return of prosperity were everywhere seen. 
 But the minority, trained in resistance to what were thought 
 to be aristocratic influences, refused to be reconciled, and be- 
 came the seed of a permanent national party. 
 
 Pichard Henry Lee had disseminated in Philadelphia the 
 objections of himself and George Mason to the constitution ; 
 and seventeen of the seceding members imbodied them in an 
 appeal to their constituents. :f But the cause of the inflamma- 
 tion in Pennsylvania was much more in their state factions 
 than in the new federal system.* 
 
 The efforts of Pichard Henry Lee were counteracted in 
 Philadelphia by Wilson, whom Washington at the time called 
 ^' as able, candid, and honest a member as was in the conven- 
 tion." On the sixth of October, at a great meeting in Phila- 
 delphia, he held up the constitution as the best w^hich the 
 world had as yet seen. To the objection derived from its want 
 of a bill of rights, he explained that the government of the 
 United States was a limited government, which had no powers 
 except those which were specially granted to it. The speech 
 was promptly reprinted in ]^ew York as a reply to the insinu- 
 ations of Lee ; and through the agency of Washington it was 
 republished in Pichmond. || But the explanation of the want 
 of a bill of rights satisfied not one state. 
 
 Great enthusiasm was awakened among the jDeople of Penn- 
 
 * Carey's Museum, vol. ii., Chronicle, pp. 6, 7. 
 
 \ Lloyd's Debates of Pennsylvania Legislature, p. 137. P. Bond to Lord Car- 
 marthen, Philadelphia, 29 September 1787. 
 
 X Washington to Madison, 10 October 1787, in Letter Book at State Depart- 
 ment. 
 
 * Madison to Jefferson, 19 February 17S8, in Madison, i., 377. 
 II Sparks, ix., 271. 
 
384: THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; en. ii. 
 
 sylvania in tlie progress of the election of their delegates ; thej 
 rejoiced at the near consummation of their hopes. The con- 
 vention was called to meet on Tuesday, the twentieth of No- 
 vember ; a quorum appeared on the next day. Before the 
 week was over the constitution on two successive days received 
 its first and second reading. Its friends, who formed a very 
 large and resolute majority, were intensely in earnest, and 
 would not brook procrastination. 
 
 On Saturday, the twenty-fourth,* Thomas McKean of Phi- 
 ladelphia, seconded by John Allison of Franklin county, offered 
 the resolution in favor of ratifying the constitution ; and Wil- 
 son, as the only one present who had been a member of the 
 federal convention, opened the debate : 
 
 " The United States exliibit to the world the first instance 
 of a nation unattacked by external force, unconvulsed by do- 
 mestic insurrections, assembling voluntarily, deliberating fully, 
 and deciding calmly concerning that system of government 
 under which they and their posterity should live. To form a 
 good system of government for a single city or an inconsidera- 
 ble state has been thought to require the strongest efforts of 
 human genius ; the views of the convention were expanded to 
 a large portion of the globe. 
 
 '' The difficulty of the business was equal to its magnitude. 
 The United States contain already thirteen governments mu- 
 tually independent ; their soil, climates, productions, dimen- 
 sions, and numbers are different ; in many instances a differ- 
 ence and even an opposition subsists among their interests, 
 and is imagined to subsist in many more. Mutual concessions 
 and sacrifices, the consequences of mutual forbearance and con- 
 ciliation, were indispensably necessary to the success of the 
 great work. 
 
 " The United States may adopt any one of four different 
 systems. They may become consolidated into one government 
 in which the separate existence of the states shall be entirely 
 absolved. They may reject any plan of union and act as un- 
 connected states. They may form two or more confederacies. 
 
 * Correct the date in Elliot, ii., 417, by Independent Gazette of 29 November 
 I'lSI. Especially, Centinel in the same, 4 December. Mr. W. [Wilson] in a 
 speech on Saturday, 24 instant, Pa. Packet of 27 November. 
 
1787. THE COIsrSTITUTION' m PEN"NSYLYANIA. 385 
 
 They may unite in one federal republic. I^eitlier of tliese 
 systems found advocates in tlie late convention. The remain- 
 ing system is a union in one confederate republic* 
 
 " The expanding quality of a government by which several 
 states agree to become an assemblage of societies that consti- 
 tute a new society, capable of increasing by means of further 
 association, is peculiarly fitted for the United States. But this 
 form of government left us almost without precedent or guide. 
 Ancient history discloses, and barely discloses, to our view 
 some confederate republics. The Swiss cantons are connected 
 only by alliances ; the United JSTetherlands constitute no new 
 society ; from the Germanic body little useful knowledge can 
 be drawn. 
 
 " Since states as well as citizens are represented in the con- 
 stitution before us, and form the objects on which that consti- 
 tution is proposed to operate, it is necessary to mention a kind 
 of liberty which has not yet received a name. I shall distin- 
 guish it by the appellation of federal liberty. The states should 
 resign to the national government that part, and that part only^^ 
 of their political liberty which, placed in that government^ 
 will produce more good to the whole than if it had remained 
 in the several states. While they resign this part of their po- 
 litical liberty, they retain the free and generous exercise of all 
 their other faculties, so far as it is compatible with the weKare 
 of the general and superintending confederacy. 
 
 " The powers of the federal government and those of the 
 state governments are drawn from sources equally pure. The 
 principle of representation, unknown to the ancients, is con- 
 fined to a narrow comer of the British constitution. For the 
 American states were reserved the glory and happiness of dif- 
 fusing this vital principle throughout the constituent parts of 
 government. 
 
 " The convention found themselves embarrassed with 
 another difficulty of pecuhar delicacy and importance ; I mean 
 that of drawing a proper line between the national government 
 and the governments of the several states. Whatever object 
 of government is confined in its operation and eSects within 
 the bounds of a particular state should be considered as belong- 
 
 * Elliot, li., 427, 428. 
 VOL. YI. — 25 
 
386 THE STATES RATIFY THE COI^STITUTION. b. iv. ; ch. ii. 
 
 ing to the goyernment of that state ; whatever object of gov- 
 ernment extends in its operation or effects beyond the bound? 
 of a particular state should be considered as belonging to the 
 government of the United States. To remove discretionary 
 construction, the enumeration of particular instances in which 
 the application of the principle ought to take place will be 
 found to be safe, unexceptionable, and accurate. 
 
 " To control the power and conduct of the legislature by 
 an overruling constitution limiting and superintending the op- 
 erations of legislative authority was an improvement in the 
 science and practice of government reserved to the American 
 states. Oft have I marked with silent pleasure and admiration 
 the force and prevalence through the United States of the 
 principle that the supreme power resides in the people, and 
 that they never part with it. There can be no disorder in the 
 community but may here receive a radical cure. Error in the 
 legislature may be corrected by the constitution ; error in 
 the constitution, by the people. The streams of power run 
 in different directions, but they all originally flow from one 
 abundant fountain. In this constitution all authority is de- 
 rived from the people." 
 
 Already much had been gained for the friends of the con- 
 stitution. "I am sensible," said John Smilie of Fayette 
 county, " of the expediency of giving additional strength and 
 energy to the federal head." The question became on the 
 one side the adoption of the constitution as it came from the 
 convention ; on the other, with amendments. Smilie spoke 
 against a system of precipitancy which would preclude deliber- 
 ation on questions of the highest consequence to the happiness 
 of a great portion of the globe. " Is the object," he asked, 
 " to bring on a hasty and total adoption of the constitution ? 
 The most common business of a legislative body is submitted 
 to repeated discussion upon different days." Robert "White- 
 hill of Carlisle, in Cumberland county, fearing a conveyance to 
 the federal government of rights and liberties which the peo- 
 ple ought never to surrender, asked a reference to a committee 
 of the whole. He was defeated on the twenty-sixth, by a vote 
 of forty-three to twenty-four ; but each member obtained leave 
 to speak in the house as often as he pleased. When it was ob- 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN PENNSYLVANIA. 387 
 
 served that the federal convention had exceeded the powers 
 given to them by their respective legislatures, Wilson an- 
 swered : " The federal convention did not proceed at all upon 
 the powers given to them by the states, but upon original 
 principles ; and having framed a constitution which they 
 thought would promote the happiness of their country, they 
 have submitted it to their consideration, who may either adopt 
 or reject it as they please." * 
 
 On the twenty-seventh, Whitehill, acting in concert with 
 the Virginia opposition and preparing the way for entering on 
 the journals a final protest against the proceedings of the ma- 
 jority, proposed that upon all questions where the yeas and 
 nays were called any member might insert the reason of his 
 vote upon the journal of the convention. This was argued 
 all the day long, and leave was refused by a very large ma- 
 jority.! 
 
 The fiercest day's debate, and the only one where the de- 
 cision of *the country was finally in favor of the minority, took 
 place on the twenty-eighth of N^ovember. There was a rising 
 discontent at the omission of a declaration of rights. To prove 
 that there was no need of a bill of rights, Wilson said : " The 
 boasted Magna Charta of England derives the liberties of the 
 inhabitants of that kingdom from the gift and grant of the 
 king, and no wonder the people were anxious to obtain bills of 
 rights ; but here the fee simple remains in the people ; and by 
 this constitution they do not part with it. The preamble to 
 the proposed constitution, ' We the people of the United States 
 do establish,' contains the essence of all the bills of rights that 
 have been or can be devised." :j: The defence was imperfect 
 both in sentiment and in public law. To the sentiment, Smilie 
 answered : " The words in the preamble of the proposed sys- 
 tem, however superior they may be to the terms of the great 
 charter of England, must yield to the expressions in the Penn- 
 sylvania bill of rights and the memorable declaration of the 
 fourth of July 1776." As a question of public law, the an- 
 swer of Smilie was equally conclusive : " It is not enough to 
 
 * Independent Gazetteer, 29 Xovembor 1*787. 
 
 f Independent Gazetteer for 3 December; and especially for 1 December 1787. 
 
 X Elliot's Debates, ii., 434-439. 
 
388 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION. b.iv.;ch.ii. 
 
 reserve to the people a right to alter and abolish government, 
 but some criterion should be established by which it can easily 
 and constitutionally ascertain how far the government may 
 proceed and when it transgresses its jurisdiction." " A bill of 
 rights," interposed McKean, " though it can do no harm, is an 
 unnecessary instrument. The constitutions of but live out of 
 the thirteen United States have bills of rights." The speaker 
 was ill informed. South Carolina and Georgia had alone de- 
 clined the opportunity of establishing a bill of rights ; every 
 state to the north of them had one except Ehode Island and 
 Connecticut, which as yet adhered to their original charters, 
 and 'New Jersey, which still adhered to its government as es- 
 tablished just before the declaration of independence. New 
 York had incorporated into its constitution the whole of that 
 declaration. 
 
 Wilson asserted that in the late convention the desire of 
 '' a bill of rights had never assumed the shaj^e of a motion." 
 Here his memory was at fault ; but no one present could cor- 
 rect him. " In civil governments," he proceeded, '' bills of 
 rights are useless, nor can I conceive whence the contrary no- 
 tion has arisen. Virginia has no bill of rights." Smilie inter- 
 rupted him to cite the assurance of George Mason himself that 
 Virginia had a bill of rights ; and he repeated the remark that 
 Mason * had made in the convention : " The laws of the gen- 
 eral government are paramount to the laws and constitutions 
 of the several states ; and as there is no declaration of rights 
 in the new constitution, the declarations of rights in the con- 
 stitutions of the several states are no security. Every stipula- 
 tion for the most sacred and invaluable privileges of man is 
 left at the mercy of government." f 
 
 On Saturday, the first of December, William Findley, the 
 third leading member of the opposition, in a long and elabo- 
 rate argument endeavored to prove that the proposed plan of 
 government was not a confederation of states, but a consolida- 
 tion of government. He insisted that the constitution formed 
 a contract between indi\dduals entering into society, not a 
 
 * Gilpin, 1566; Elliot, 538. 
 
 f Independent Gazetteer, December 10, 13, 18, 20, 24, 27. Review of the 
 Constitutions by De La Croix, English translation, ii., 386, note. 
 
178T. THE CONSTITUTION IN DELAWARE. 380 
 
 union of independent states ; that in the legislature it estab- 
 lished the vote by individuals, not by states ; that between two 
 parties in the same community, each claiming independent 
 sovereignty, it granted an unlimited right of internal taxation 
 to the federal body, whose stronger will would thus be able to 
 annihilate the power of its weaker rival ; that it conceded a 
 right to regulate and judge of elections ; that it extended the 
 judicial power as widely as the legislative ; that it raised the 
 members of congress above their states, for they were paid not 
 by the states as subordinate delegates, but by the general gov- 
 ernment ; and finally, that it required an oath of allegiance to 
 the federal government, and thus made the allegiance to a 
 separate sovereign state an absurdity.^' 
 
 Meantime the zeal of the majority was quickened by news 
 from " the Delaware state," whose people were for the most 
 part of the same stock as the settlers of Pennsylvania, and had 
 groAvn up under the same proprietary. On the proposal for 
 the federal convention at Philadelphia, its general assembly 
 declared that " they had long been fully convinced of the ne- 
 cessity of revising the federal constitution," "being wilhng 
 and desirous of co-operating with the commonwealth of Vir- 
 ginia and the other states in the confederation." f Now that 
 an equality of vote in the senate had been conceded, the one 
 single element of . opposition disappeared. The legislature of 
 Delaware met on the twenty-fourth of October, and follow- 
 ing " the sense and desire of great numbers of the people of 
 the state, signified in petitions to their general assembly," 
 " adopted speedy measures to call together a convention." :j: 
 
 The constituent body, which met at Dover in the first week 
 of December, encountered no difficulty but how to find lan- 
 guage strong enough to express their joy in what had been done. 
 On the sixth "the deputies of the people of the Delaware 
 state fully, freely, and entirely approved of, assented to, rati- 
 fied, and confirmed the federal constitution," to which they 
 all on the next day subscribed their names.* 
 
 * Independent Gazetteer, 6 December, 1*787. 
 
 f Laws of Delaware, page 892, in edition of 1797. 
 :j: Packet, 17 November 1787. 
 
 * Journals of Congress, iv. Appendix, 46. 
 
390 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION. b.iv.;ch.ii. 
 
 When it became known tliat Delaware was leading the 
 way at the head of the grand procession of the thirteen states, 
 McKean, on Monday, the tenth of December, announced to 
 the Pennsylvania convention that he should on the twelfth 
 press the vote for ratification. 
 
 On the next day Wilson summed up his defence of the con- 
 stitution, and repeated : " This system is not a compact ; I 
 cannot discern the least trace of a compact ; the introduction 
 to the work is not an unmeaning flourish ; the system itself 
 tells you what it is, an ordinance, an establishment of the ]3eo- 
 ple." * The opposition followed the Hne of conduct marked 
 out by the opposition in Virginia. On the twelfth, before the 
 question for ratification was taken, Whitehill presented peti- 
 tions from seven hundred and fifty inhabitants of Cumberland 
 county against adopting the constitution without amendments, 
 and particularly without a bill of rights to secure liberty in 
 matters of religion, trial by jury, the freedom of the press, the 
 sole power in the individual states to organize the militia ; the 
 repeal of the executive power of the senate, and consequent 
 appointment of a constitutional council ; a prohibition of re- 
 pealing or modifying laws of the United States by treaties ; 
 restrictions on the federal judiciary power; a confirmation to 
 the several states of their sovereignty, with every power, juris- 
 diction, and right not expressly delegated to the United States 
 in congress assembled. In laboring for this end, he showed a 
 concert with the measure which Mason and Randolph liad pro- 
 posed in the federal convention and Richard Henry Lee in 
 congress, and which led the Virginia legislature on that very 
 day to pass the act for communicating with sister states, f 
 
 The amendments which Whitehill proposed were not suf- 
 fered to be entered in the journal. His motion was rejected 
 by forty-six to twenty-three; and then the new constitution 
 was ratified by the same majority. 
 
 On Thursday the convention marched in a procession to the 
 court-house, where it proclaimed the ratification. Returning 
 to the place of meeting, the forty-six subscribed their names 
 to their act. The opposition were invited to add their names 
 as a fair and honorable acquiescence in the principle that the 
 
 * Elliot, ii., 497, 499. f Hening, xii., 463. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION IN NEW JERSEY. 391 
 
 majority should govern. John Harris refused, yet held himself 
 bound by the decision of the majority. Smilie answered: 
 " My hand shall never give the lie to my heart and tongue." 
 Twenty-one of the minority signed an exceedingly long address 
 to their constituents, complaining that the extent of the country 
 did not admit of the proposed form of government without 
 danger to liberty; and that the powers vested in congress 
 would lead to an iron-handed despotism, with unlimited con- 
 trol of the purse and tlie sword. 
 
 The ratification gave unbounded satisfaction to all Penn-" 
 sylvania east of the Susquehanna ; beyond that river loud mur- 
 murs were mingled with threats of resistance in arms. On 
 the fifteenth the convention dissolved itself, after offering a 
 permanent and a temporary seat of government to the United 
 States. 
 
 The population of 'New Jersey at that time was almost ex- 
 clusively rural ; in the west chiefly the descendants of Quak- 
 ers, in the east of Dutch and Scottish Calvinists. This in- 
 dustrious, frugal, and pious people, little agitated by political 
 disputes, received the federal constitution with joy, and the 
 consciousness that its ow^n sons had contributed essentially to 
 its formation.* 
 
 On the twenty-sixth of October its legislature called a state 
 convention by a unanimous vote. On the eleventh of Decem- 
 ber the convention of New Jersey, composed of accomplished 
 civilians, able judges, experienced generals, and fair-minded, 
 intelligent husbandmen, assembled in Trenton. The next day 
 was spent in organizing the house, all the elected members 
 being present save one. John Stevens was chosen president 
 by ballot ; Samuel Whitham Stockton, secretary. The morn- 
 ing began with prayer. Then with open doors the convention 
 proceeded to read the federal constitution by sections, giving 
 opportunity for debates and for votes if called for ; and, after 
 a week's deliberation, on Tuesday, the eighteenth, determined 
 unanimously to ratify and confirm the federal constitution. 
 A committee, on which appear the names of Brearley, a mem- 
 ber of the federal convention, "Witherspoon, Neilson, Beatty, 
 former members of congress, was appointed to draw up the 
 
 * Penn. Journal, 7 November 1'787. 
 
302 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTION-, b. iv. ; ch. ii. 
 
 form of the ratification ; and tlie people of the state of 'New 
 Jersey, " by the unanimous consent of the members present, 
 agreed to, ratified, and confirmed the proposed constitution 
 and every part thereof." * 
 
 On the next day, the resolve for ratification having been 
 engrossed in duplicate on parchment, one copy for the con- 
 gress of the United States and one for the archives of the state, 
 every member of the convention present subscribed his name. 
 
 In the shortest possible time, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and 
 New Jersey, the three central states, one by a majority of two 
 thirds, the others unanimously, accepted the constitution. 
 
 The union of the central states was of the best omen. Be- 
 fore knowing their decision, Georgia at the extreme south had 
 independently taken its part ; its legislature chanced to be in 
 session when the message from congress arrived. All its rela- 
 tions to the United States were favorable ; it was in j^ossession 
 of a territory abounding in resources and large enough to con- 
 stitute an empire ; its people felt the need of protection against 
 Spain, w^hich ruled along their southern frontier from the 
 Mississippi to the Atlantic, and against the savages who dwelt 
 in their forests and hung on the borders of their settlements. 
 A convention which was promptly called met on Christmas- 
 day, with power to adopt or reject any part or the whole of the 
 proposed constitution. Assembled at Augusta, its members 
 finding themselves all of one mind, on the second day of the 
 new year, unanimously, for themselves and for the people of 
 Georgia, fully and entirely assented to, ratified, and adopted 
 the proposed constitution. They hoped that their ready com- 
 pliance would " tend to consolidate the union " and " promote 
 the happiness of the common country." The completing of 
 the ratification by the signing of the last name was announced 
 by a salute of thirteen guns in token of faith that every state 
 would accede to the new bonds of union. f 
 
 * Penn. Journal and Penn. Packet, 22 and 29 December. 
 •j- Stevens, History of Georgia, ii., 387. 
 
1787-1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN CONNECTICUT. 393 
 
 CIIAPTEE III. 
 
 the constitution in connecticut and massachusetts. 
 Feom 26 September 1787 to G Febeuart 1788. 
 
 On the twenty-sixtli of September Eoger Sliennan and 
 Oliver Ellsworth, two of the delegates from Connecticut to the 
 federal convention, transmitted to Samuel Huntington, then 
 governor of the state, a printed copy of the constitution to be 
 laid before the legislature. In an accompanying official letter 
 they observed that the proportion of suffrage accorded to the 
 state remained the same as before ; and they gave the assur- 
 ance that the " additional powers vested in congress extended 
 only to matters respecting the common interests of the union, 
 and were specially defined; so that the particular states re- 
 tained their sovereignty in all other matters." * The restraint 
 on the legislatures of the several states respecting emitting bills 
 of credit, making anything but money a tender in payment of 
 debts, or impairing the obligation of contracts by ex jpost facto 
 laws, was thought necessary as a security to commerce, in which 
 the interest of foreigners as wxll as of the citizens of different 
 states may be affected.f 
 
 The governor was a zealous friend of the new constitution. 
 The legislature, on the sixteenth of October, unanimously :|: 
 sailed a convention of the state. To this were chosen the re- 
 tired and the present highest officers of its government ; the 
 judges of its courts ; " ministers of the Gospel ; " and nearly 
 sixty who had fought for independence. Connecticut had a 
 special interest in ratifying the constitution ; the compromise 
 
 * Compare the remark of Wilson, supra, 385, 386. 
 t Elliot, i., 491, 492. ij: Madison, i., 359. 
 
394 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTIOK b. iv. ; ch. hi. 
 
 requiring for acts of legislation a majority of tlie states and a 
 majority of the representatives of the people had prevailed 
 through its own delegates. 
 
 In January 1788, the convention, having been organized in 
 the State-house in Hartford, moved immediately to the North 
 Meeting House, where, in the presence of a multitude, the 
 constitution was read and debated section by section, under an 
 agreement that no vote should be taken till the whole of it 
 should have been considered.* 
 
 On the fourth, Oliver Ellsworth explained the necessity of 
 a federal government for the national defence, for the manage- 
 ment of foreign relations, for preserving peace between the 
 states, for giving energy to the public administration. He 
 pointed out that a state like Connecticut was specially benefited 
 by the restraint on separate states from collecting duties on for- 
 eign importations made through their more convenient harbors. 
 
 Johnson added : While under the confederation states in 
 their political capacity could be coerced hy nothing but a mili- 
 tary force ; the constitution introduces the mild and equal 
 energy of magistrates for the execution of the laws. " By a 
 signal intervention of divine providence, a convention from 
 states differing in circumstances, interests, and manners, have 
 harmoniously adopted one grand system ; if w^e reject it, our 
 national existence must come to an end." f 
 
 The grave and weighty men who listened to him approved 
 his words ; but when tlie paragraph which gave to the general 
 government the largest powers of taxation was debated, James 
 "Wadsworth, who had served as a general officer in the war, 
 objected to duties on imports as partial to the southern states. 
 " Connecticut," answered Ellsworth, " is a manufacturing state ; 
 it already manufactures its implements of husbandry and half 
 its clothes." Wadsworth further objected, that authority which 
 unites the power of the sword to that of the purse is despotic. 
 Ellsworth replied : " The general legislature ought to have a 
 revenue ; and it ought to have power to defend the state against 
 foreign enemies ; there can be no government without the 
 power of the purse and the sword." '' So w^ell guarded is this 
 constitution," observed Oliver Wolcott, then lieutenant-go v- 
 
 * Penn. Packet for 18 January 1788. f Penn. Packet, 24 January 1788 
 
1787-1788. THE COJ^STITUTIOl!^ IN CONNECTICUT. 395 
 
 ernor, " it seems impossible that tlie riglits eitlier of tlie states 
 or of the people should be destroyed." When on the ninth 
 the vote was taken, one hundred and twenty-eight appeared 
 for the constitution ; forty only against it.* 
 
 The people received with delight the announcement of this 
 great majority of more than three to one ; at the next election 
 the " wrong-headed " James Wadsworth was left out of the 
 government ; and opposition grew more and more faint till it 
 wholly died away. 
 
 The country from the St. Croix to the St. Mary's now fixed 
 its attention on Massachusetts, whose adverse decision would in- 
 evitably involve the defeat of the constitution. The rejDresen- 
 tatives of that great state, who came together on the seven- 
 teenth of October, had been chosen under the influence of the 
 recent insurrection ; and the constitution, had it been submit- 
 ted to their judgment, would have been rejected.f In com- 
 municating it to the general court, the governor most wisely 
 avoided provoking a discussion on its merits, and simply recom- 
 mended its reference to a convention from regard to the worth 
 of its authors and their unanimity on questions affecting the 
 prosperity of the nation and the complicated rights of each 
 separate state. :j: 
 
 Following his recommendation with exactness, the senate, 
 of which Samuel Adams was president, promptly adopted a 
 resolve to refer the new constitution to a convention of the 
 commonwealth. On motion of Theox^hilus Parsons, of xTew- 
 buryport, a lawyer destined to attain in his state the highest 
 professional honors, the resolve of the senate was opened in 
 the house. Spectators crowded the galleries and the floor. 
 
 * Penn. Packet, 24 January 1788. 
 
 f B. Lincoln to Washington, Boston, 19 March 1788. 
 
 i The conduct of Hancock in support of the constitution vras from beginning 
 to end consistent ; and so wise that the afterthought of the most skilful caviller 
 can not point out where it could be improved. Nathaniel Gorham, who had 
 known Hancock lonp and well, in a letter to Madison of 27 January 1788, the 
 darkest hour, places Hancock and Bowdoin foremost in the list of the managers 
 of the cause of the constitution, naming them with equal confidence. Hancock, 
 who was not wanting in sagacity, may have seen, and others may have let hira 
 know that they too saw, how much the support of the constitution would strengthen 
 his position in public life : but at that time he had nothing to fear from the rivalry 
 of Bowdoin, who had definitively retired. 
 
396 THE STATES RATIFY THE OONSTITUTIOK b. iv. ; en. iii. 
 
 Signs of a warm opposition appeared ; the right to supersede 
 the old confederation was denied alike to the convention and 
 to the people ; the adoption of a new constitution by but nine 
 of the thirteen states would be the breach of a still valid com- 
 pact. An inalienable power, it was said in reply, resides in 
 the people to amend their form of government. An array of 
 parties was avoided ; and with little opposition a convention 
 was ordered. 
 
 The choice took place at a moment when the country peo- 
 ple of Massachusetts were bowed down by cumulative debts, 
 and quivering in the agonies of a suppressed insurrection ; the 
 late disturbers of the peace were scarcely certain of amnesty ; 
 and they knew that the general government, if established, 
 must array itself against violence. The election resulted in 
 the choice of at least eighteen of the late insurgents. The ru- 
 ral population were disinclined to a change. The people in 
 the district of Maine, which in territory far exceeded Massa- 
 chusetts, had never willingly accepted annexation ; the desire 
 for a government of their own outweighed their willingness 
 to enter into the union as a member of Massachusetts ; and one 
 half of their delegates were ready to oppose the constitution. 
 On the other hand, the commercial towns of Maine, all manu- 
 facturers, men of wealth, the lawyers, including the judges of 
 all the courts, and nearly all the officers of the late army, were 
 in favor of the new form of general government. The voters 
 of Cambridge rejected Elbridge Gerry in favor of Francis 
 Dana ; in Beverly, Nathan Dane was put aside * for George 
 Cabot ; the members from Maine were exactly balanced ; but 
 of those from Massachusetts proper a majority of perhaps ten 
 or twelve was opposed to the ratification of the constitution. 
 Among the elected were King, Gorham, and Strong, who had 
 been of the federal convention ; the late and present governors, 
 Bowdoin and Hancock ; Heath and Lincoln of the army ; of 
 rising statesmen, John Brooks and Christopher Gore ; The- 
 ophilus Parsons, Theodore Sedgwick, John Davis, and Fisher 
 Ames ; and about twenty ministers of various religious de- 
 nominations. So able a body had never met in Massachusetts. 
 Full of faith that the adoption of the constitution was the 
 
 * Ind. Gazetteer, 8, 9 January 1788. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN MASSACHUSETTS. 397 
 
 greatest question of the age, the f ederaKsts were all thoroiighl;y 
 in earnest, and influenced bj no inferior motives ; so that there 
 could be among them neither cabals in council nor uncertainty 
 in action. They obeyed an immovable determination to over- 
 come the seemingly adverse majority. As a consequence, they 
 had discipline and concerted action. 
 
 It was consistent with the whole public life of Samuel Ad- 
 ams, the helmsman of the revolution at its origin, the truest 
 representative of the home rule of Massachusetts in its town- 
 meetings and general court, that he was startled when, on en- 
 tering the new " building, he met with a national government 
 instead of a federal union of sovereign states ; " but, in direct 
 antagonism to George Mason and Richard Henry Lee, he had 
 always approved granting to the general government the power 
 of regulating commerce."^ Before he had declared his inten- 
 tions, perhaps before they had fully ripened, his constituents 
 of the industrial classes of Boston, which had ever been his 
 main support, came together, and from a crowded hall a cry 
 went forth that on the rejection of the constitution " naviga- 
 tion " would languish and " skilful mechanics be compelled to 
 emigrate," so that " any vote of a delegate from Boston against 
 adopting it would be contrary to the interests, feelings, and 
 wishes of the tradesmen of the town." 
 
 The morning betokened foul weather, but the heavy clouds 
 would not join together. The enterprising and prosperous 
 men of Maine, though they desired separation from Massachu- 
 setts, had no sympathy with the late insurrection ; and the 
 country people, though they could only by slow degrees ac- 
 custom their minds to untried restraints on their rustic liberty, 
 never wavered in their attachment to the union. The conven- 
 tion was organized with the governor of the commonwealth as 
 its president.f The federahsts of Philadelphia had handled 
 their opponents roughly ; the federalists of Massachusetts re- 
 
 * The activity and wise and efficient support of the constitution by Samuel 
 Adams I received from my friend John Davis, who was a member of the conven- 
 tion, and who was singularly skilful in weighing evidence. The account which he 
 gave me is thoroughly supported by the official record. 
 
 f Debates and Proceedings in the Convention, etc., published by the legislature 
 of Massachusetts, edited by B. K. Peirce and C. Ilale. The best collection on the 
 subject. 
 
398 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; ch. iii. 
 
 solved never in debate to fail in gentleness and courtesy. A 
 motion to request Elbridge Gerry to take a seat in the conven- 
 tion, that he might answer questions of fact, met no objection ; 
 and he was left to grow sick of sitting in a house to which he 
 had failed of an election, and in whose debates he could not 
 join. On motion of Caleb Strong, no vote was to be taken till 
 the debate, which assumed the form of a free conversation, 
 should have gone over the several paragraphs of the constitu- 
 tion.* 
 
 Massachusetts had instructed its delegates in the federal 
 convention to insist on the annual election of representatives ; 
 Samuel Adams asked why they were to be chosen for two 
 years. Strong explained that it was a necessary compromise 
 among so many states; and Adams answered; "I am satis- 
 fied." f This remark the federal leaders entreated him to re- 
 peat ; he did so, when all gave attention, and the objection was 
 definitively put to rest. 
 
 Referring to tlie power of congress to take part in regu- 
 lating the elections of senators and representatives, Phineas 
 Bishop of Rehoboth proclaimed "the liberties of the yeo- 
 manry at an end." It is but " a guarantee of free elections," 
 said Cabot. " And a security of the rights of the people," 
 added Theophilus Parsons. " Our rulers," observed Widgery 
 of Maine, " ought to have no power which they can abuse." if 
 " All the godly men we read of," added Abraham White of 
 Bristol, " have failed ; I would not trust a flock, though every 
 one of them should be a Moses." 
 
 On the seventeenth an ofiicial letter from Connecticut an- 
 nounced the very great majority by which it had adopted the 
 constitution ; but its enemies in Massachusetts w^ere unmoved. 
 Samuel Thompson of Maine condemned it for not requiring 
 of a representative some property qualification, saying : " Men 
 w^ho have nothing to lose have nothing to fear." " Do you 
 wish to exclude from the federal government a good man be- 
 cause he is not rich ? " asked Theodore Sedgwick. '' The men 
 who have most injured the country," said King, " have com- 
 monly been rich men." 
 
 On tlie eighteenth the compromise respecting the taxation 
 
 * Elliot, ii., d. f From John Davis. X Elliot, ii., 28. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN MASSACHUSETTS. 399 
 
 and representation of slaves was cried against. Thomas Dawes 
 of Boston answered : " Congress in tlie year 1808 may wlioHy 
 prohibit the importation of them, leaving every particular state 
 in the mean time its own option totally to prohibit their intro- 
 duction into its own territories. Slavery could not be abol- 
 ished by an act of congress in a moment ; but it has received a 
 mortal wound." * 
 
 On the nineteenth a farmer of Worcester county com- 
 plained : " There is no provision that men in power should 
 have any religion ; a Papist or an inhdel is as eligible as Chris- 
 tians." John Brooks and Parsons spoke on the other side ; 
 and Daniel Shute, the minister of Hingham, said; ''I^o con- 
 ceivable advantage to the whole will result from a test." Wil- 
 liam Jones of Maine rejoined : " It would be happy for the 
 United States if our public men were to be of those who have 
 a good standing in the church." Philip Payson, the minister 
 of Chelsea, retorted : " Human tribunals for the consciences of 
 men are impious encroachments upon the prerogatives of God. 
 A religious test, as a qualification for otfice, would have been a 
 great blemish." 
 
 William Jones of Maine objected to the long period of 
 otfice for the senators. " One third of the senators," observed 
 Fisher Ames, "are to be introduced every second year; the 
 constitution, in practice as in theory, will be that of a federal 
 republic." "We cannot," continued Jones, "recall the sena- 
 tors." " Their duration," answered King, " is not too long for 
 a right discharge of their duty." 
 
 On the twenty-first. King explained the nature of the tran- 
 sition f from a league of states with only authority to make 
 requisitions on each state, to a republic instituted by the peo- 
 ple with the right to apply laws directly to the individual 
 members of the states. He showed that without the power 
 over the purse and the sword no government can give security 
 to the people ; analyzed and defended the grant of revenue 
 alike from indirect and direct taxes, and insisted that the pro- 
 posed constitution is the only efiicient federal government that 
 can be substituted for the old confederation. 
 
 Thomas Dawes of Boston defended the power of laying 
 
 * EU'ot, ii., 41. t Elliot, ii., 54-5'7. 
 
400 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTIOi^. b. iv. ; oh. hi. 
 
 imposts and excises in this wise : " For want of general laws of 
 prohibition through the union, our coasting trade, our whole 
 commerce, is going to ruin. A vessel from Halifax with its 
 fish and whalebone finds as heart j a welcome at the southern 
 ports as though built and navigated and freighted from Salem 
 or Boston. South of Delaware three fourths of the exports 
 and three fourths of the returns are made in British bottoms. 
 Of timber, one half of the value — of other produce shipped 
 for London from a southern state, three tenths — ^go to the Brit- 
 ish carrier in the names of freight and charges. This is money 
 which belongs to the l^ew England states, because we can fur- 
 nish the ships much better than the British. Our sister states are 
 willing that these benefits should be secured to us by national 
 laws ; but we are slaves to Europe. We have no uniformity 
 in duties, imposts, excises, or prohibitions. Congress has no 
 authority to withhold advantages from foreigners in order to 
 obtain reciprocal advantages from them. Our manufacturers 
 have received no encouragement by national duties on foreign 
 manuf actui-es, and they never can by any authority in the con- 
 federation. The very face of our country, our numerous falls 
 of water, and places for mills, lead to manufactures : have they 
 been encouraged ? Has congress been able by national laws to 
 prevent the importation of such foreign commodities as are 
 made from such raw materials as we ourselves raise? The 
 citizens of the United States within the last three years have 
 contracted debts with the subjects of Great Britain to the 
 amount of near six millions of dollars. If we wish to en- 
 courage our own manufactures, to preserve our own commerce, 
 to raise the value of our own lands, we must give congress the 
 powers m question." ^ 
 
 Every day that passed showed the doubtfulness of the con- 
 vention. " The decision of Massachusetts either way," wrote 
 Madison from congress, " will involve the result in ITew York," 
 and a negative would rouse the minority in Pennsylvania to a 
 stubborn resistance. Langdon of ISTew Hampshire, and men 
 from l^ewport and Providence who came to watch the course 
 of the debates, reported that I^ew Hampshire and Rhode 
 Island would accept the constitution should it be adopted by 
 
 * Elliot, ii., 57-60. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION" IN MASSACHUSETTS. 401 
 
 Massacliusetts. Gerry, under the influence of HicLard Henry 
 Lee, had written a letter to the two houses of Massachusetts, 
 insinuating that the constitution needed amendments, and 
 should not be adopted till they were made. These same sug- 
 gestions had been circulated throughout Virginia, where, as 
 has already been related,* Washington threw himself into tlie 
 discussion and advised, as the only true policy, to accept the 
 constitution and amend it by the methods which the con- 
 stitution itself had established. The letter in which he had 
 given this advice reached Boston in season to be published in 
 the Boston "Centinel" of the twenty- third of January. In 
 the convention the majority still seemed adverse to the consti- 
 tution. To win votes from the ranks of its foes, its friends, 
 following the counsels of Washington, resolved to combine 
 with its ratification a recommendation of amendments. For 
 this end Bowdoin and Hancock, Theophilus Parsons and Gor- 
 ham, Samuel Adams, Heath, and a very few other resolute and 
 trusty men, matured in secret council a plan of action. f 
 
 Meantime Samuel Thompson could see no safety but in a 
 bill of rights. Bowdoin spoke at large for the new govern- 
 ment with its ability to pay the public debts and to regulate 
 commerce. "Power inadequate to its object is worse than 
 none ; checks are provided to prevent abuse. The whole con- 
 stitution is a declaration of rights. It will complete the tem- 
 ple of American liberty, and consecrate it to justice. May 
 this convention erect Massachusetts as one of its pillars on the 
 foundation of perfect union, never to be dissolved but by the 
 dissolution of nature." J 
 
 Parsons recapitulated and answered the objections brought 
 against the constitution, and closed his remarks by saying : " An 
 increase of the powers of the federal constitution by usurpa- 
 tion wiU be upon thirteen completely organized legislatures 
 having means as well as inclination to oppose it successfully. 
 The people themselves have power to resist it without an ap- 
 peal to arms. An act of usurpation is not law, and therefore 
 is not obligatory ; and any man may be justified in his resist- 
 ance. Let him be considered as a criminal by the general 
 
 * See page 380 of this volume. 
 
 f King to Madison, quoted in Madison's Writings, i., 373. ^ Elliot, ii., S0-S8. 
 VOL. VI. — 26 
 
402 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; oh. iii. 
 
 government ; liis own fellow-citizens are his jurj ; and if they 
 pronounce him innocent, not all the powers of congress can 
 hurt him." * 
 
 On the morning of the twenty-fourth, Nason of Maine, 
 an implacable enemy of the constitution, proposed to cease 
 its discussion by paragraphs so as to open the whole question. 
 This attempt " to hurry the matter " was resisted by Samuel 
 Adams in a speech so eifective that the motion was negatived 
 without a division. 
 
 On the next day Amos Singletary of Sutton, a husband- 
 man venerable from age and from patriotic service from the 
 very beginning of the troubles with England, resisted the con- 
 stitution as an attempt to tax and bind the people in all cases 
 whatsoever. 
 
 Jonathan Smith of Lanesborough, speaking to men who 
 like himself followed the plough for their livelihood, began a 
 reply by arguments drawn from the late insurrection, when he 
 was called to order. Samuel Adams instantly said with au- 
 thority : " The gentleman is in order ; let him go on in his own 
 way." The " plain man " then proceeded in homely words to 
 show that farmers in the western counties, in their great dis- 
 tress during the insurrection, would have been glad to snatch 
 at anything like a govermnent for protection. " This constitu- 
 tion," he said, " is just such a cure for these disorder as w^e 
 wanted. Anarchy leads to tyranny." 
 
 Attention was arrested by the clause on the slave-trade. 
 '* My profession," said James Neal of Maine, " obliges me to 
 bear witness against anything that favors making merchandise 
 of the bodies of men, and unless this objection is removed I 
 cannot put my hand to the constitution." " Shall it be said," 
 cried Samuel Thompson, " that after we have established our 
 own independence and freedom we make slaves of others? 
 How has Washington immortalized himself ! but he holds those 
 in slavery who have as good a right to be free as he has.' ' Dana 
 and Samuel Adams rejoiced that a door was to be opened for 
 the total annihilation of the slave-trade after twenty years ; but 
 hatred of slavery influenced the final vote.f 
 
 On the morning of the thirty-first of January, Hancock, 
 
 * Elliot, ii., 94. f Elliot, ii., 107, 120. 
 
1738. THE CONSTITUTIOIsr IN" MASSACHUSETTS. 403 
 
 wlio till tlien had been kept from liis place by painful illness, 
 took the chair, and the concerted movement began. Conver- 
 sation came to an end ; and Parsons proposed " that the con- 
 vention do assent to and ratify the constitution."* Heath 
 suggested that in ratifying it they should instruct their mem- 
 bers of congress to endeavor to provide proper checks and 
 guards in some of its paragraphs, and that the convention 
 should correspond with their sister states, to request their con- 
 currence." t 
 
 Hancock then spoke earnestly for the necessity of adopting 
 the proposed form of government ; and brought forward nine 
 general amendments. Taken from the letters of Richard 
 Henry Lee, the remonstrance of the minority in Pennsylvania, 
 and the objections made in the Massachusetts debates, " they 
 were the production of the federalists after mature delibera- 
 tion," and were clad in terse and fittest words, which revealed 
 the workmanship of Parsons. " All powers not expressly dele- 
 gated to congress," so ran the most important of them, " are 
 reserved to the several states." 
 
 " I feel myself happy," thus Samuel Adams addressed the 
 chair, " in contemplating the idea that many benefits w^ill re- 
 sult from your Excellency's conciliatory proposition to this 
 commonwealth and to the whole United States. The objec- 
 tions made to this constitution as far as Virginia are similar. 
 I have had my doubts ; other gentlemen have had theirs ; the 
 proposition submitted will tend to remove such doubts, and 
 conciliate the minds of the convention and of the people out- 
 of-doors. The measure of Massachusetts will from her impor- 
 tance have the most salutary effect in other states where con- 
 ventions have not yet met, and throughout the union. The 
 people should be united in a federal government to withstand 
 the common enemy and to preserve their rights and liberties ; 
 I should fear the consequences of large minorities in the sev- 
 eral states. 
 
 "The article which empowers congress to regulate com- 
 merce and to form treaties I esteem particularly valuable. For 
 want of this power in our national head our friends are 
 grieved ; our enemies insult us ; our minister at the court of 
 
 * Elliot, ii., 120. f ElUot, ii., 122. 
 
404 THE STATES EATIFY THE COiTSTITUTION. b. iy. ; oh. hi. 
 
 London is a cipher. A power to remedy this evil should be 
 given to congress, and applied as soon as possible. I move 
 that the paper read by your Excellency be now taken into con- 
 sideration." * 
 
 Samuel Adams, on the first day of February, invited mem^ 
 bers to propose still further amendments; but Nason of 
 Maine, the foremost in opposition, stubbornly refused to take 
 part in supporting a constitution which, they said, " destroyed 
 the sovereignty of Massachusetts." f 
 
 The measure was referred to a committee formed on the 
 principle of selecting from each county one of its friends and 
 one of its opponents ; but as both of the two delegates from 
 Dukes county were federalists, only one of them took a place 
 in the committee. Thirteen of its members were federalists 
 from the beginning. At the decision, the committee consisted 
 of twenty-four members; one absented himself and one de- 
 clined to vote ; so that in the afternoon of Monday, the fourth 
 of February, Bowdoin as chairman of the committee could re- 
 port its approval of the constitution with the recommendation 
 of amendments by a vote of fifteen to seven. 
 
 At tliis result opposition flared anew. Thomas Lusk of 
 "West Stockbridge revived complaints of the slave-trade, and 
 of opening the door to popery and the inquisition by dispens- 
 ing with a religious test. But Isaac Backus, the Baptist min- 
 ister of Middleborough, one of the most exact of ITew Eng- 
 land historians, replied : " In reason and the holy scriptures 
 religion is ever a matter between God and individuals ; the 
 imposing of religious tests hath been the greatest engine of 
 tyranny in the world." Rebuking the importation of slaves 
 with earnestness, he trusted in the passing away of slavery 
 itself, saying : " Slavery grows more and more odious to the 
 world." J " This constitution," said Fisher Ames, on the fifth 
 
 * Elliot, ii., 123-125. Let no one be misled by the words "conditional 
 amendments " in the report of Mr. Adams's speech. He spoke not of amend- 
 ments offered as the condition of the acceptance of the constitution by Massa- 
 chusetts, but advised that Massachusetts should connect with its ratification a 
 recommendation of amendments ; the ratification to be valid whatever fate might 
 await the amendments. This is exactly the proposition concerted between Par- 
 sons, Hancock, and himself. Rufus King to Knox, in Drake's Knox, 98. 
 f Elliot, ii., 133, 134. J Elliot, ii., 148-151. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN MASSACHUSETTS. 405 
 
 day, " is comparatively perfect ; no subsisting government, no 
 government which I have ever heard of, will bear a compari- 
 son with it. The state government is a beautiful structure, 
 situated, however, upon the naked beach; the union is the 
 dike to fence out the flood." * 
 
 John Taylor of Worcester county objected that the 
 amendments might never become a part of the system, and 
 that there was no bill of rights. " No power," answered Par- 
 sons, "is given to congress to infringe on any one of the 
 natural rights of the people ; should they attempt it without 
 constitutional authority, the act would be a nullity and could 
 not be enforced." Gilbert Dench of Middlesex, coinciding 
 with the wishes of the opposition in Yirginia, and with a mo- 
 tion of Whitehill in the convention of Pennsylvania, proposed 
 an adjournment of the convention to some future day. A 
 long and warm contest ensued ; but Samuel Adams skiKully 
 resisted the motion, and of the three hundred and twenty-nine 
 members who were present, it obtained but one hundred and 
 fifteen votes. f 
 
 On the sixth the office of closing the debate was by com- 
 mon consent assigned to Samuel Stillman, a Baptist minister 
 of Boston. Recapitulating and weighing the arguments of 
 each side, he said, in the words of a statesman of Virginia : 
 " Cling to the union as the rock of our salvation," and he sum- 
 moned the state of Massachusetts " to urge Yirginia to finish 
 the salutary work which hath been begun." :j: 
 
 Before putting the question, Hancock spoke words that 
 were remembered : " I give my assent to the constitution in 
 full confidence that the amendments proposed will soon be- 
 come a part of the system. The people of this commonwealth 
 will quietly acquiesce in the voice of the majority, and, where 
 they see a want of perfection in the proposed form of govern- 
 ment, endeavor, in a constitutional way, to have it amended." 
 
 The question being taken, the counties of Dukes, Essex, 
 Su£[olk, and Plymouth, and in Maine of Cumberland and 
 Lincoln, all counties that touched the sea, gave majorities in 
 favor of the constitution ; Middlesex and Bristol, the whole of 
 Massachusetts to the west of them, and the county of York in 
 
 * Elliot, ii., 154-159. f Elliot, ii., 161, 162. + Elliot, u., 162, 170. 
 
/ 
 
 406 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; ch. iii. 
 
 Maine, gave majorities against it. The majority of Maine for 
 tlie constitution was in proportion greater than in Massachusetts. 
 ^ The motion for ratifying the constitution was declared to 
 be in the affirmative by one hundred and eighty-seven votes 
 against one hundred and sixty-eight.* The bells and artillery 
 announced the glad news to every part of the town. 
 
 With the declaration of the vote, every symptom of per- 
 sistent opposition vanished. No person even wished for a 
 protest. Tlie convention, after dissolving itseK, pai*took of a 
 modest collation in the senate-chamber, where, merging party 
 ideas in mutual congratulations, they all " smoked the calumet 
 of love and •union." " The Boston people," WTote Knox to 
 Livingston, " have lost their senses with joy." f The Long 
 Lane by the meeting-house, in which the convention held its 
 sessions, took from that time the name of Federal street. The 
 prevaiUng joy difiPused itself through the commonwealth. In 
 'New York, at noon, men hoisted the pine-tree flag with an 
 appropriate inscription. Six states had ratified, and six salutes, 
 each of thirteen guns, were lired. 
 
 The example of Massachusetts was held worthy of imita- 
 tion. " A conditional ratification or a second convention," so 
 wrote Madison to Eandolph in April, " appears to me utterly 
 irreconcilable with the dictates of prudence and safety. Rec- 
 ommendatory alterations are the only ground for a coalition 
 among the real federalists." :j: 
 
 Jefferson, w^hile in congress as the successor of Madison, 
 had led the way zealously toward rendering the American 
 constitution more perfect. "The federal convention," so he 
 wrote to OPiC correspondent on liearing who were its members, 
 "is really an assembly of demigods;" and to another: "It 
 consists of the ablest men in America." He hoped from it a 
 broader reformation, and saw with satisfaction " a general dis- 
 position through the states to adopt what it should propose." 
 To Washington he soberly expressed the opinions from which 
 during his long life he never departed : " To make our states 
 one as to all foreign concerns, preserve tliem several as to all 
 
 * Elliot, ii., T74-176, 181. 
 
 f Knox to Livingston, 13 February 1788. 
 
 X Madison's Works, i., 3S6, and compare 37G-379. 
 
1787-1789. THE CONSTITUTION IN MASSACHUSETTS. 407 
 
 merely domestic, to give to the federal liead some peaceable 
 mode of enforcing its just authority, to organize that head 
 into legislative, executive, and judiciary departments, are great 
 desiderata." * 
 
 Early in ITovember Jefferson received a copy of the new 
 constitution, and approved the great mass of its provisions.! 
 But once he called it a kite set np to keep the hen-yard in or- 
 der ; :j: and with three or four new articles he would have pre- 
 served the venerable fabric of the old confederation as a sacred 
 rehc. 
 
 To Madison * he explained himself in a long and deliber- 
 ate letter. A house of representatives elected directly by the 
 people he thought would be far inferior to one chosen by the 
 state legislatures ; but he accepted that mode of election from 
 respect to the fundamental principle that the people are not to 
 be taxed but by representatives chosen immediately by them- 
 selves. He was captivated by the compromise between the 
 great and smaller states, and the method of voting in both 
 branches of the legislature by persons instead of voting by 
 states; but he utterly condemned the omission of a bill of 
 rights, and the abandonment of the principle of rotation in the 
 choice of the president. In December he declared himself " a 
 friend to a very energetic government ; " for he held that it 
 would bo " always oppressive." He presumed that Virginia 
 would reject the new constitution ; || for himself he said : " It 
 is my principle that the will of the majority should prevail ; 
 if they approve, I shall cheerfully concur in the proposed con- 
 stitution, in hopes they will amend it whenever they shall find 
 that it works Avrong." ^ In February 1788 he wrote to Madi- 
 son (} and at least one more of his correspondents : *' I wish 
 with all my soul that the nine first conventions may accept the 
 new constitution, to secure to ns the good it contains ; but I 
 equally wish that the four latest, whichever they may be, may 
 refuse to accede to it till a declaration of rights be annexed ; 
 but no objection to the new form must produce a schism in 
 
 * Jefferson, i., 349, 260, 140, 2G4, 250, 251. 
 
 f Jefferson, i., 79, and ii., 58G. || Jefferson, ii., 325. 
 X Jefferson, ii., 319. ^ Jefferson, ii., 332. 
 
 # Jefferson, ii., 328-331. () Jefferson to Madison, G February 1788. 
 
408 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTIO:^'. b. it. ; oh. hi. 
 
 our union." This was the last word from him which reached 
 America in time to have any influence. But in May of that 
 year, so soon as he heard of the method adopted by Massachu- 
 setts, he declared that it was far preferable to his own, and 
 wished it to be followed by every state, especially by Vir- 
 ginia.^ To Madison he wrote in July : " The constitution is 
 a good canvas on which some strokes only want retouching." f 
 In 1789 to a friend in Philadelphia he wrote with perfect 
 truth : " I am not of the party of federalists ; but I am much 
 further from that of the anti-federalists." J 
 
 The constitution was to John Adams more of a surprise 
 than to Jefferson ; but at once he formed his unchanging judg- 
 ment, and in December 1787 he wrote of it officially to Jay : 
 " The public mind cannot be occupied about a nobler object 
 than the proposed plan of government. It appears to be ad- 
 mirably calculated to cement all America in affection and in- 
 terest as one great nation. A result of compromise cannot 
 perfectly coincide with every one's ideas of perfection ; but, 
 as all the great principles necessary to order, liberty, and safety 
 are respected in it, and provision is made for amendments as 
 they may be found necessary, I hope to hear of its adojotion 
 by all the states." * 
 
 * Jefferson, ii., 398, 399, 404. f Jefferson, ii., 445. X Jefferson, ii., 585, 586. 
 
 * John Adams's Works, viii., 467; Diplomatic Correspondence, 1783-1789, 
 v., 356. 
 
1788, THE CONSTITUTION IN NEW HxiMPSHIRE. 409 
 
 CHAPTER lY. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION IN" NEW HAMPSHIRE, IkLVRYLANDj AND SOUTH 
 
 CAROLINA. 
 
 Feom Febeuaey TO 23 May 1788. 
 
 Langdon, the outgoing cliief magistrate of ISTew Hamp- 
 shire, and Sullivan, his successful competitor, vied with each 
 other in zeal for federal measures ; but when, in February 
 1788, the convention of the state came together there appeared 
 to be a small majority against any change. In a seven days' 
 debate, Joshua Atherton of Amherst ; Yf illiam Plooper, the 
 minister of Marbury ; Matthias Stone, deacon of the church in 
 Claremont; Abiel Parker, from Jaffrey, reproduced the ob- 
 jections that had been urged in the neighboring state ; while 
 John Sullivan, John Langdon, Samuel Livermore, Josiah Bart- 
 lett, and John Pickering explained and defended it with con- 
 ciliatory moderation. When zealots complained of the want 
 of a religious test, Woodbury Langdon, lately president of 
 Harvard college, but now a minister of the gospel at Hampton 
 Falls, demonstrated that religion is a question between God 
 and man in which no civil authority may interfere. Dow, 
 from Weare, spoke against the twenty years' sufferance of the 
 foreign slave-trade; and to the explanation of Langdon that 
 under the confederation the power exists without limit, Ather- 
 ton answered : " It is our full purpose to wash our hands clear 
 of becoming its guarantees even for a term of years." 
 
 The friends of the constitution won converts enough to 
 hold the balance ; but these were fettered by instructions from 
 their towns. To give them an opportunity to consult their 
 constituents, the friends of the constitution proposed an ad- 
 
410 THE STATES RATIFY THE C0:N"STITUTI0X. B.iv.;cn.iy. 
 
 joTirnment till June, saying, witli ofclier reasons, that it would 
 be verj prudent for a small state like ISTew Hampsliire to wait 
 and see wliat the other states would do. This was the argu- 
 ment which had the greatest weight.* The place of meeting 
 was changed from Exeter, a stronghold of federalism, to Con- 
 cord ; and the adjournment was then carried by a slender ma- 
 jority.! 
 
 The assembly of Maryland, in November 1787, summoned 
 its delegates to tha federal convention to give them informa- 
 tion of its proceedings; and Martin rehearsed to them and 
 published to the world his three days' arraignment of that 
 body for having exceeded its authority. He was answered by 
 McIIenry, who, by a concise analysis of the constitution, drew 
 to himself the sympathy of his hearers. The legislature unani- 
 mously ordered a convention of the people of the state; it 
 copied the example set by Virginia of leaving the door open 
 for amendments ; ^ and by a majority of one the day for the 
 choice and the day for the meeting of its convention were 
 postponed till the next April. 
 
 The long delay gave opportunity for the cabalings of the 
 anti-federalists of Virginia.* Hichard Henry Lee was as zeal- 
 ous as ever ; and Patrick Henry disseminated propositions for 
 a southern confederacy ; || but Washington, who felt himself 
 at home on the Maryland side of the Potomac, toiled fearless- 
 ly and faithfully, with Madison at his side, for the immediate 
 and unconditioned ratification of the constitution by the South. 
 
 In the three months' interval before the election, the fields 
 and forests and to^^vns of Maryland were alive with thought ; 
 the merits of the constitution were scanned and sifted in every 
 public meeting and at every hearth ; and on the day in 1788 
 for choosing delegates, each voter, in designating the candidate 
 of his preference, registered his o^vn deliberate decision. In 
 fifteen counties, and the cities of Baltimore and Annapolis, 
 there was no diversity of sentiment. Two counties only re- 
 
 * Report in the Mass. Spy, copied into Ind. Gazetteer of 9 April 17S8. 
 f Ind. Gazetteer, 17 March 1788. 
 
 X Madison to Jefferson, 9 December 17S7 ; Madison, i., 363, 3G1. 
 
 * Letters to Washington, iv., 196. 
 
 I This is repeatedly told of Henry by Carriugton. See also Madison, i., 365 
 
 I 
 
1783 THE CONSTITUTION" IN MARYLAND. 411 
 
 turned none but anti-federalists ; Harford county elects d tliree 
 of that party and one trimmer. 
 
 The day before the convention was to assemble, Washing- 
 ton, guarding against the only danger that remained, addressed 
 a well-considered letter to Thomas Johnson : " An adjoui-n- 
 ment of your convention will be tantamount to the rejection 
 of the constitution. It cannot be too much dej)reeated and 
 guarded against. Great use is made of the postponement in 
 New Hampshire, although it lias no reference to the conven- 
 tion of this state. An event similar to this in Maryland would 
 have the worst tendency imaginable; for indecision there 
 would certainly have considerable influence upon South Caro- 
 lina, the only other state which is to precede Yirginia ; and it 
 submits the question almost wholly to the determination of the 
 latter. The pride of the state is already touched, and will be 
 raised much higher if there is fresh cause." * 
 
 The advice, which was confirmed by similar letters from 
 Madison, was communicated to several of the members ; so 
 that the healing influence of Yirginia proved greater than its 
 power to wound. But the men of Maryland of themselves 
 knew their duty, and Washington's advice was but an encour- 
 agement for them to proceed in the way which they had 
 chosen. 
 
 On Monday, the twenty-first of April, a quorum of the 
 convention assembled at Annapolis. The settlement of repre- 
 sentation in the two branches of the federal legislature was 
 pleasing to all the representatives of fifteen counties, and the 
 cities of Baltimore and Annapolis agreed with each other per- 
 fectly that the main question had already been decided by the 
 people in their respective counties ; and that the ratification of 
 the constitution, the single transaction for which they were 
 convened, ought to be speedily completed. Two days were 
 given to the organization of the house and establishing rules 
 for its government ; on the third tlie constitution was read a 
 first time, and the motion for its ratification was formally made. 
 The plan of a confederacy of slave-holding states found not 
 
 * "Washington to Thomas Johnson, 20 April 1'788 ; T. Johnson to Washing- 
 ton, 10 October 1788. Compare Washington to James McIIenry, 27 April 1788 ; 
 to Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer, 27 April 1788 ; to James Madison, 2 ilay 1788. 
 
412 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; ch. iv. 
 
 one supporter ; not one suggested an adjournment for tlie pur- 
 pose of consultation with Virginia. The malcontents could 
 embarrass the convention only by proposing pernicious amend- 
 ments. 
 
 On the morning of the twenty-fourth, Samuel Chase took 
 his seat, and at the second reading of the constitution began 
 from elaborate notes the fiercest opposition : The powers to be 
 vested in the new government are deadly to the cause of hberty, 
 and should be amended before adoption ; five states can now 
 force a concession of amendments which after the national gov- 
 ernment shall go into operation could be carried only by nine.* 
 He spoke till he was exhausted, intending to resume his argu- 
 ment on the following day. 
 
 In the afternoon, William Paca of Harford county, a 
 signer of the declaration of independence, aj^peared for the 
 first time and sought to steer between the clashing opinions, 
 saying : " I have a variety of objections ; not as conditions, but 
 to accompany the ratification as standing instructions to the 
 representatives of Maryland in congress." To Johnson the 
 request seemed candid; and on his motion the convention 
 adjourned to the next morning. f The interval was em- 
 ployed in preparing a set of amendments to the constitution, 
 which were adapted to injure the cause of federalism in Vir- 
 ginia. J 
 
 On Friday morning a member from each of eleven several 
 counties and the two cities, one after the other, declared " that 
 he and his colleagues were under an obligation to vote for the 
 government ; " and almost all declared further that they had 
 no authority to propose amendments which their constituents 
 had never considered, and of course could never have directed.* 
 When Paca began to read his amendments, he was called to 
 order by George Gale of Somerset county, the question before 
 the house being still " on the ratification of the constitution." 
 Chase once more " made a display of all his eloquence ; " 
 John F. Mercer discharged his whole " artillery of inflammable 
 
 * Notes of Chase on the constitution, MS. ; and the historical address of Alex. 
 C. Hanson, MS. f Hanson's MS. narrative. 
 
 X James Mellenry to Washington, 18 May 1788. 
 
 # Alex. C. Hanson. MS. Elliot, ii., 548. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTIOlNr IN MAEYLAND. 413 
 
 matter ; " and Martin rioted in boisterons " vehemence ; " " but 
 no converts were made ; no, not one." * 
 
 The friends to the federal government " remained inflexibly 
 silent." The malcontents having tired themselves out, be- 
 tween two and three o'clock on Saturday, the twenty-sixth, the 
 constitution was ratified by sixty-three votes against eleven, 
 Paca voting with the majority. Proud of its great majority 
 of nearly six to one, the convention fixed Monday, at three 
 o'clock, for the time when they would all set their names to 
 the instrument of ratification. 
 
 Paca then brought forward his numerous amendments, say- 
 ing that with them his constituents would receive the consti- 
 tution, without them would oppose it even with arms.f After 
 a short but perplexed debate he was indulged in the appoint- 
 ment of a committee of thirteen, of which he himself was the 
 chairman; but they had power only to recommend amend- 
 ments to the consideration of the people of Maryland. The 
 majority of the committee readily acceded to thirteen resolu- 
 tions, explaining the constitution according to the construction 
 of its friends, and restraining congress from exercising power 
 not expressly delegated. The minority demanded more ; the 
 committee fell into a wrangle ; the convention on Monday sent 
 a summons for them ; and Paca, taking the side of the minori- 
 ty, would make no report. Thereupon the convention dis- 
 solved itself by a great majority. 
 
 The accession of Maryland to the new union by a vote of 
 nearly six to one brought to the constitution the majority of 
 the thirteen United States, and a great majority of their free 
 inhabitants. The state which was cradled in religious liberty 
 gained the undisputed victory over the first velleity of the 
 slave-holding states to form a separate confederacy. " It is a 
 thorn in the sides of the leaders of opposition in this state!" 
 wrote Washington to Madison. J " Seven afiirmative without 
 a negative would almost convert the unerring sister. The 
 fiat of your convention will most assuredly raise the edifice," * 
 were his words to Jenifer of Maryland. 
 
 * Washington to Madison, 2 May 1788. f Hanson. MS. 
 X Washington to Madison, 2 May 1788. 
 
 * Washington to Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer, 27 April 1788. 
 
414 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION b. iv. ; en. iv. 
 
 In his hours of meditation he saw the movement of the di- 
 vine power which gives nnitj to the "universe, and order and 
 connection to events : " It is impracticable for any one who 
 has not been on the spot to realize the change in men's minds, 
 and the progress toward rectitude in thinking and acting. 
 
 " The plot thickens fast. A few short weeks will deter- 
 mine the political fate of America for the present generation, 
 and probably produce no small influence on the happiness of 
 society through a long succession of ages to come. Should 
 everything proceed w^ith harmony and consent according to 
 our actual wishes and expectations, it will be so much beyond 
 anything we had a right to imagine or expect eighteen months 
 ago that it will, as visibly as any possible event in the course 
 of human affairs, demonstrate the linger of Providence." ^ 
 
 In South Carolina the new constitution awakened fears of 
 oppressive navigation acts and of disturbance in the ownership 
 of slaves. The inhabitants of the upper country, who suffered 
 from the undue legislative power of the city of Charleston 
 and the lower counties, foreboded new inequalities from a 
 consolidation of the union. A part of the low country, still 
 suffering from the war, had shared the rage for instalment 
 laws, paper money, and payment of debts by appraised prop- 
 erty ; and to all these the new constitution made an end. 
 
 The opposition from Virginia f intrigued for a southern 
 confederacy, while Madison, in entire unison with Washing- 
 ton, wrote to his friends in behalf of union.:]: They both 
 knew that there was to be resistance to the constitution, with 
 Rawlins Lowndes for its spokesman ; and as he could by no 
 possibility be elected into the convention, the chief scene of 
 the opposition could only be the legislature.* 
 
 In January 1788 the senate unanimously voted thanks to 
 the members from their state in the federal convention for 
 their faithfulness. On the sixteenth, in the committee of the 
 whole house of representatives, Charles Pinckney gave a his- 
 
 * Washington to the Marquis de la Fayette, 28 May 1*788. 
 
 f Jefferson to Shippen, 14 July 1783. "Mr. Henry disseminated propositions 
 there for a southern confederacy." 
 
 X Madison to Washington, 10 April 1788. Works, i., 384, 885. 
 
 * Madison, i., 382 ; Elliot, iv., 274. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTIOiT IN" SOUTH CAROLINA. 415 
 
 tor J* of the formation and tlie character of "the federal re- 
 public ; " which was to operate upon the people and not upon 
 the states. At once Lowndes f objected that the interests of 
 South Carolina were endangered by the clause in the constitu- 
 tion according to which a treaty to be made by two thirds of 
 the senate, and a president who w^as not likely ever to be chosen 
 from South Carolina or Georgia, would be the supreme law 
 of the land. Cotesworth Pinckney condemned the reasoning as 
 disingenuous. "Every treaty," said John Kutledge, "is law 
 paramount and must operate," not less under the confederation 
 than under the constitution, f "If treaties are not superior to 
 local laws," asked Kamsay, "who will trust them?" Lowndes 
 proceeded, saying of the confederation : " We are now under 
 a most excellent constitution — a blessing from heaven, that 
 has stood the test of time, and given us liberty and independ- 
 ence ; yet we are impatient to pull down that fabric w^hich we 
 raised at the expense of our blood." * Now, Eawlins Lowndes 
 had pertinaciously resisted the declaration of independence ; and 
 when, in 1778, South Carolina had made him her governor, had 
 in her reverses sought British protection. He proceeded : 
 " When this new constitution shall be adopted, the sun of the 
 southern states will set, never to rise again. AVhat cause is 
 there for jealousy of our importing negroes ? Why confine us 
 to twenty years ? Why limit us at all ? This trade can be 
 justified on the principles of religion and humanity. They 
 do not like our slaves because they have none themselves, and, 
 therefore, v^ant to exclude us from this great advantage." ] 
 
 " Every state," interposed Pendleton, " has prohibited the 
 importation of negroes except Georgia and the two Carolinas." 
 
 Lowndes continued: "Without negroes this state would 
 degenerate into one of the most contemptible in the union, 
 l^egroes are our wealth, our only natural resource ; yet our 
 kind friends in the ISTorth are determined soon to tie up our 
 hands and drain us of w^hat we have." 
 
 " Against the restrictions that might be laid on the African 
 trade after the year 1808," said Cotesworth Pinckney on the 
 
 * Elliot, iv., 253-263. t Elliot, iv., 267, 268. 
 
 f Elliot, iv., 265, 266. * Elliot, iv., 270-272. 
 
 I Elliot, iv.. 272. 
 
416 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; ch. i\r. 
 
 seventeentli, " jour delegates had to contend with the reh'gious 
 and political prejudices of the eastern and middle states, and 
 with the interested and inconsistent opinion of Virginia. It 
 was alleged that slaves increase the weakness of any state 
 which admits them ; that an invading enemy could easily turn 
 them against ourselves and the neighboring states ; and tliat, 
 as we are allowed a representation for them, our injfluence in 
 government would be increased in proportion as we were less 
 able to defend ourselves. ' Show some period,' said the mem- 
 bers from the eastern states, ' when it may be in our power 
 to put a stop, if we please, to the importation of this weakness, 
 and we will endeavor, for your convenience, to restrain the re- 
 ligious and political prejudices of our people on this subject.' 
 The middle states and Virginia made us no such proposition ; 
 they were for an immediate and total prohibition. A com- 
 mittee of the states was appointed in order to accommodate 
 this matter, and, after a great deal of difficulty, it was settled 
 on the footing recited in the constitution. 
 
 " By this settlement we have secured an unlimited impor- 
 tation of negroes for twenty years. The general government 
 can never emancipate them, for no such authority is granted, 
 and it is admitted on all hands that the general government 
 has no powers but what are expressly granted by the consti- 
 tution. We have obtained a right to recover our slaves in 
 whatever part of America they may take refuge, which is a 
 right we had not before. In short, considering all circum- 
 stances, we have made the best terms in our power for the 
 security of this species of property. "We would have made 
 better if we could ; but, on the whole, I do not think them 
 bad." * 
 
 " Six of the seven eastern states," continued Lowndes, 
 " form a majority in the house of representatives. Their inter- 
 est will so predominate as to divest us of any pretensions to 
 the title of a republic. They draw their subsistence, in a great 
 measure, from their shipping ; the regulation of our commerce 
 throws into their hands the carrying trade under payment of 
 whatever freightage they think proper to impose. Why 
 should the southern states allow this without the consent of 
 
 * Elliot, iv., 277-286. 
 
,1788. THE CON-STITUTION" IN" SOUTH OAEOLIN-A. 417 
 
 nine states ? If at any future period we should remonstrate, 
 ' mind your business ' will be the style of language held out 
 toward the southern states." "The fears that the northern 
 interests will prevail at all times," said Edward Kutledge, " are 
 ill-founded. Carry your views into futurity. Several of the 
 northern states are already full of people ; the migrations to 
 the South are immense ; in a few years we shall rise high in 
 our representation, while other states will keep their present 
 position." * 
 
 The argument of Lowndes rested on the idea that the 
 southern states are weak. " We are weak," answered Cotes- 
 worth Piuckney ; " by ourselves we cannot form a union strong 
 enough for the purpose of effectually protecting each other. 
 Without union with the other states, South Carolina must soon 
 fall. Is there any one among us so much a Quixote as to sup- 
 pose that this state could long maintain her independence if 
 she stood alone, or was only connected w^ith the southern states ? 
 I scarcely believe there is. As, from the nature of our climate 
 and the fewness of our inhabitants, we are undoubtedly weak, 
 should we not endeavor to form a close union with the eastern 
 states, who are strong ? We certainly ought to endeavor to 
 increase that species of strength which will render them of 
 most service to us both in peace and war. I mean their navy. 
 Justice to them and humanity, interest and policy, concur in 
 prevailing upon us to submit the regulation of commerce to 
 the general government.f 
 
 Lowndes renewed his eulogy on the old confederation. 
 " The men who signed it were eminent for patriotism and vir- 
 tue ; and their wisdom and prudence particularly appear in 
 their care sacredly to guarantee the sovereignty of each state. 
 The treaty of peace expressly agreed to acknowledge us free, 
 sovereign, and independent states ; but this new constitution, 
 being sovereign over all, sweeps those privileges away." X 
 
 Cotesworth Pinckney answered : " We were independent 
 before the treaty, which does not grant, but acknowledges our 
 independence. We ought to date that blessing from an older 
 charter than the treaty of peace ; from a charter which our 
 
 * Elliot, iv., 272, 274, 276, 277, 288. 
 I Elliot, iv., 283, 284. X Elliot, iv., 287. 
 
 VOL. VI.— 27 
 
4:18 THE STATES EATIFY THE CONSTITUTIOIT. b. iv. ; ch. iv. 
 
 babes should be taught to lisp in their cradles ; which our youth 
 should learn as a carmen necessarium^ an indispensable lesson ; 
 which our young men should regard as their compact of free- 
 dom ; and which our old should repeat with ejaculations of 
 gratitude for the bounties it is about to bestow on their pos- 
 terity. I mean the declaration of independence, made in con- 
 gress the 4th of July 17TG. This manifesto, which for impor- 
 tance of matter and elegance of composition stands unrivalled, 
 confutes the doctrine of the individual sovereignty and inde- 
 pendence of the several states. The separate independence and 
 individual sovereignty of the several states were never thought 
 of by the enlightened band of patriots who framed this decla- 
 ration. The several states are not even mentioned by name in 
 any part of it ; as if to impress on America that our freedom 
 and independence arose from our union, and that without it 
 we could neither be free nor independent. Let us, then, con- 
 sider all attempts to weaken this miion by maintaining that 
 each state is separately and individually independent, as a spe- 
 cies of political heresy which can never benefit us, but may 
 bring on us the most serious distresses." "^ 
 
 Lowndes sought to rally to his side the friends of paper 
 money, and asked triumphantly : " What harm has paper 
 money done ? " " What harm ? " retorted Cotesworth Pinck- 
 ney. " Beyond losses by depreciation, paper money has cor- 
 rupted the morals of the people ; has diverted them from the 
 paths of honest industry to the ways of ruinous speculation ; 
 has destroyed both public and private credit ; and has brought 
 total ruin on numberless widows and orphans." f 
 
 James Lincoln of Ninety-six pressed the objection that 
 the constitution contained no bill of rights. Cotesworth Pinck- 
 ney answered : " ^y delegating express powers, w^e certainly 
 reserve to ourselves every power and right not mentioned in 
 the constitution. Another reason weighed particularly with 
 the members from this state. Bills of rights generally begin 
 with declaring that all men are by nature born free. Now, we 
 should make that declaration with a very bad grace when a 
 large part of our property consists in men who are actually 
 born slaves." X 
 
 * ElUot, iv., 301, 302. f Elliot, iv., 306. % Elliot, iv., 315, 316. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION^ IN SOUTH CAROLINA. 419 
 
 Lowndes, following the lead of the opposition of Virginia, 
 had recommended another convention in which every objection 
 could be met on fair giounds, and adequate remedies applied.* 
 The proposal found no acceptance ; but he persevered in cavil- 
 ling and objecting. At last John Rutledge impatiently ex- 
 pressed a hope that Lowndes would find a seat in the coming 
 convention, and pledged himself there to prove that all those 
 grounds on which he dwelt amounted to no more than mere 
 declamation ; that his boasted confederation was not worth a 
 farthing ; that if such instruments were piled up to his chin 
 they would not shield him from one single national calamity ; 
 that the sun of this state, so far from being obscured by the new 
 constitution, would, when united with twelve other suns, aston- 
 ish the world by its lustre." f 
 
 The resolution for a convention to consider the constitution 
 Was unanimously adopted. In the rivalry between Charleston 
 and Columbia as its place of meeting, Charleston carried the 
 day by a majority of one vote. :j: 
 
 The purest spirit of patriotism and union and veneration 
 for the men of the revolution pervaded South Carohna at the 
 time of her choice of delegates. Foremost among them were 
 the venerable Christopher Gadsden and John llutledge, Moul- 
 trie and Motte, William Washington, Edward Rutledge, the 
 three Pincloieys, Grimke, and Ramsay ; the chancellor and 
 the leading judges of the state ; men chiefly of English, Scotch, 
 Scotch-Irishj and Huguenot descent ; a thorough representation 
 of the best elements and culture of South Carolina. 
 
 The convention organized itself on the thirteenth of May, 
 with Thomas Pinckney, then Governor of South Carolina, as 
 president. The ablest man in the opposition was Edanus 
 Burke ; but the leader in support of the Virginia malcontents 
 was Sumter. A week's quiet consideration of the constitu- 
 tion by paragraphs showed the disposition of the convention, 
 when on the twenty-first Sumter, as a last effort of those w^ho 
 wished to act with Virginia, made a motion for an adjourn- 
 ment for five months, to give time for the further considera- 
 tion of the federal convention. A few gave way to the hope 
 of conciliating by moderation ; but after debate the motion 
 
 * Elliot, iv., 290. f Elliot, iv., 312. X Elliot, iv., 316, 317. 
 
d:20 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION. B.iy.;oH.iv. 
 
 received only eighty-nine votes against one hundred and thirty- 
 five. Three or four amendments were recommended; and 
 then, at five o'clock in the evening of the twenty-third, the 
 constitution was ratified by one hundred and forty-nine votes 
 against seventy-three — more than two to one.* As the count 
 was declared, the dense crowd in attendance, carried away by 
 a wild transport of joy, shook the air with their cheers. 
 
 When order was restored, the aged Christopher Gadsden 
 said : " I can have but little expectation of seeing the happy 
 effects that will result to my country from the wise decisions of 
 this day, but I shall say with good old Simeon : Lord, now 
 lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, for mine eyes have 
 seen the salvation of my country." f 
 
 The delegates of South Carolina to the federal convention 
 received a vote of thanks. Those in the opposition promised 
 as good citizens to accept the result. In 1765 South Carolina 
 was one of the nine states to meet in convention for resistance 
 to the stamp-act ; and now she was the eighth state of the nine 
 required for the adoption of the constitution. 
 
 When the astonishing tidings reached IN'ew Hampshire, her 
 people grew restless to be the state yet needed to assure the 
 new bond of union ; but for that palm she must run a race 
 with Yirginia. 
 
 * Elliot, iv., 318, 338-340. f Penn. Packet, 14 June 1788. 
 
1735-1786. THE NAVIGATION OF THE MISSISSIPPI. 421 
 
 CHAPTEE Y. 
 
 the constitution in virginia and in new hampshire. 
 
 From May 1785 to 25 June 1788. 
 
 From Yirginia proceeded the soutliern opposition to the 
 consolidation of the union. A strife in congress, in which tlie 
 North was too much in the wrong to succeed, united the five 
 southernmost states together in a struggle which endangered 
 the constitution. 
 
 In May 1785, Diego Gardoqui arrived, charged with the 
 afEairs of Spain, and seemingly empowered to fix the respect- 
 ive limits and adjust other points * between two countries 
 which bordered on each other from the Atlantic to the head- 
 spring of the Mississippi. On the twentieth of July 1785 
 congress invested Secretary Jay with full powers to negotiate 
 with Gardoquijf instructing him, however, previous to his 
 making or agreeing to any proposition, to communicate it to 
 congress. The commission was executed, and negotiations im- 
 mediately began. Jay held the friendship of Spain most de- 
 sirable as a neighbor ; as a force that could protect the United 
 States from the piracies of the Barbary powers and conciliate 
 the good-will of Portugal and Italy ; as a restraint on the in- 
 fluence of France and of Great Britain ; and as the ruler of 
 dominions of which the trade offered tempting advantages. 
 He therefore proposed that the United States, as the price of a 
 treaty of reciprocity in commerce, should forego the naviga- 
 tion of the Mississippi for twenty-five or thirty years. 
 
 On the third of August 1786, Jay appeared before congress 
 
 * Diplomatic Correspondence, vi., 81-97. Secret Journals, iii., 669, 570. 
 f Secret Journals, iii., 568-570. 
 
422 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. it. ; ch. v. 
 
 and read an elaborate paper, in whicli lie endeavored to prove 
 that the experiment was worth trying.* The proposal sacrificed 
 a vitally important right of one part of the union to a commer- 
 cial interest of another ; yet the instruction which made the 
 right to the navigation of the Mississippi an ultimatum in 
 any treaty with Spain was, after three wrecks' reflection, re- 
 pealed by a vote of seven northern states against Maryland 
 and all south of it. 
 
 On the twenty-fifth of August, Secretary Jay was enjoined 
 in his plan of a treaty with the king of Spain to stipulate the 
 right of the United States to their territorial bounds, and the 
 free navigation of the Mississippi from its source to the ocean 
 as established in their treaties with Great Britain ; and neither 
 to conclude nor to sign any treaty with the Spanish agent until 
 he should have communicated it to congress and received their 
 approbation, f 
 
 The members of the southern states were profoundly 
 alarmed. On the twenty-eighth Charles Pinckney, supported 
 by Carrington, in their distrust of Jay, sought to transfer the 
 negotiation to Madrid; but in vain. The delegates of Vir- 
 ginia, Grayson at their head, strove to separate the commer- 
 cial questions from those on boundaries and navigation. " The 
 surrender or proposed forbearance of the navigation of the 
 Mississippi," they said, "is inadmissible upon the principle of 
 the right, and upon the highest principles of national ex- 
 pedience. In the present state of the powers of congress, every 
 wise statesman should pursue a system of conduct to gain the 
 confidence of the several states in the federal council, and 
 thereby an extension of its powers. This act is a dismember- 
 ment of the government. Can the United States then dismem- 
 ber the government by a treaty of commerce? But Jay, 
 supported by the North, persisted, if 
 
 Monroe still loyally retained his desire that the regulation! 
 of commerce should be in the hands of the United States, and! 
 his opinion that without that power the union would infalliblyj 
 tumble to pieces ; but now he looked about him for means to 
 strengthen the position of his own section of the country ; and 
 
 * Diplomatic Correspondence, vi., 177. f Secret Journals, iii., 686. 
 
 I Secret Journals, iv., 87-110. 
 
1786-1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 423 
 
 to Madison on the third of September he wrote : " 1 earnestly 
 wish the admission of a few additional states into tlie confed- 
 eracy in the southern scale." * " There is danger," reported 
 Otto to Yergennes, t "that the discussion may become the 
 germ of a separation of the southern states." Murmurs arose 
 that plans were forming in New York for dismembering the 
 confederacy and throwing New York and New England into 
 one government, with the addition, if possible, of New Jersey 
 and Pennsylvania. " Even should the measure triumph under 
 the patronage of nine states or even the whole thirteen," wrote 
 Madison in October, "it is not expedient because it is not 
 just." :j: The next legislature of Virginia unanimously re- 
 solved " that nature had given the Mississippi to the United 
 States, that the sacrifice of it would violate justice, contravene 
 the end of the federal government, and destroy confidence in 
 the federal councils necessary to a proper enlargement of their 
 authority." 
 
 The plan could not succeed, for it never had the consent 
 of Spain ; and if it should be formed into a treaty, the treaty 
 could never obtain votes enough for its ratification. In the 
 new congress. New Jersey left the North ; Pennsylvania, of 
 which a large part lay in the Mississippi valley, became equally 
 divided ; and Rhode Island began to doubt. But already 
 many of Virginia's '' most federal " statesmen were extremely 
 disturbed ; Patrick Henry, who had hitherto been the cham- 
 pion of the federal cause, refused to attend the federal conven- 
 tion that he might remain free to combat its result ; and an 
 uncontrollable spirit of distrust drove Kentucky to listen to 
 Eichard Henry Lee, and imperilled the new constitution. 
 
 The people of Virginia, whose undisputed territory had 
 ample harbors convenient to the ocean, and no western limit 
 but the Mississippi, had never aspired to form a separate re- 
 public. They had deliberately surrendered their claim to the 
 north-west territory ; and true to the idea that a state should 
 not be too large for the convenience of home rule, they sec- 
 onded the desire of Kentucky to become a commonwealth by 
 itself. The opinion of Washington that the constitution would 
 
 * Monroe to Madison, 3 September 1786. 
 
 f Otto to Vergennes, 10 September 1786. | MaJison, i., 250. 
 
424 THE STATES KATIFY THE COi^STITUTIOl^. b. iv. ; oh. v. 
 
 be adopted by Yirginia was not shaken.* Relieved from anx- 
 iety at borne, be found time to watcb tbe gathering clouds of 
 revolution in Europe, and shaped in bis own mind the foreign 
 policy of tbe republic. His conclusions, which on New Year's 
 day 1788 he confided to Jefferson, his future adviser on the 
 foreign relations of tbe country, were in substance precisely as 
 follows : Tbe American revolution has spread through Europe 
 a better knowledge of the rights of mankind, the privileges of 
 the people, and tbe principles of Hberty than has existed in 
 any former period ; a war in that quarter is likely to be kin- 
 dled, especially between France and England ; in tbe impend- 
 ing struggle an energetic general government must prevent 
 the several states from involving themselves in tbe political 
 disputes of the European powers. Tbe situation of the United 
 States is such as makes it not only unnecessary but extremely 
 imprudent for them to take part in foreign quarrels. Let 
 them wisely and properly improve tbe advantages which na- 
 ture has given them, and conduct themselves with circum- 
 spection. By that policy, and by giving security to property 
 and liberty, they will become tbe asylum of the peaceful, the 
 industrious, and the wealthy from all parts of tbe civilized 
 world.f 
 
 lN"or did Washington cease bis vigilant activity to confirm 
 Yirginia in federal opinions. Especially to Edmund Ran- 
 dolph, then governor of Yirginia and in the height of bis pop- 
 ularity, be addressed himself:): with convincing earnestness, 
 and yet with a delicacy that seemed to leave the mind of Ran- 
 dolph to its own workings. 
 
 Madison, likewise, kept up with Randolph a most friendly 
 and persuasive correspondence. As a natural consequence, 
 the governor, who began to see tbe impossibility of obtaining 
 amendments without endangering the success of the constitu- 
 tion, soon planted himself among its defenders ; while Monroe, 
 leaving his inconsistency unexplained, was drawn toward the 
 adversaries of Madison. 
 
 * Washington to Lafayette, 10 January 1788. 
 
 f Washin!]cton to Jefferson, 1 January 1788. Compare Washington to Knox, 
 10 January 1788. MS. 
 
 X Washington to Edmund Randolph, 8 January 1788. Sparks, ix., 297. 
 
1788. THE COISrSTITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 425 
 
 The example of Massacliusetts had great influence by its 
 recommendation of amendments ; and still more by the avowed 
 determination of the defeated party honestly to support the 
 decision of tlie majority. But while the more moderate of the 
 malcontents " appeared to be preparing for a decent sub- 
 mission," and even Eichard Henry Lee set bounds to his op- 
 position,* the language of Henry was : " The other states can- 
 not do without Virginia, and we can dictate to them what 
 terms we please." " His plans extended contingently even to 
 foreign alliances." f 
 
 The report from the federal convention agitated the people 
 more than any subject since the first days of the revolution, 
 and with a greater division of opinion. :j: It was remarked that 
 while in the seven northern states the principal ofiicers of gov- 
 ernment and largest holders of property, the judges and law- 
 yers, the clergy and men of letters, were almost without ex- 
 ception devoted to the constitution, in Virgin ia the bar and 
 the men of the most culture and property were divided. In 
 Yirginia, too, where the mass of the people, though accus- 
 tomed to be guided by their favorite statesmen on all new and 
 intricate questions, now, on a question which surjDassed all 
 others in novelty and intricacy, broke away from their lead 
 and followed a mysterious and prophetic influence T7hich rose 
 from the heart. The phenomenon w^as the more wonderful^ 
 as all the adversaries of the new constitution justified their op-'^ 
 position on the ground of danger to the liberties of the people.*. 
 And over all discussions, in private or in public, there hovered 
 the idea that "Washington was to lead the country safely along 
 the untrodden path. 
 
 In the time preceding the election the men of Kentucky 
 were made to fear the surrender of the Mississippi by the 
 federal government ; and the Baptists, the reunion of church 
 and state. 11 The election of Madison to the convention was 
 
 * Compare Cyrus Griffin to Thomas Fitzsimons, 15 February 1*788. 
 f Carrington to Madison, 18 January 1788. 
 
 it Monroe to Madison, 13 October 1787. 
 
 * Madison, i., 365, 366. 
 
 I James Madison, Sr., to his son, 30 January 1788 ; Scrapie's Baptists in 
 Virginia, 76, 77. 
 
426 THE STATES KATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. it. ; ch. v. 
 
 held to be indispensable.* " lie will be the main pillar of the 
 constitution," thought Jefferson ; " but though an immensely 
 powerful one, it is questionable whether he can bear the weight 
 of such a host." f But the plan for a southern confederacy 
 was crushed by the fidelity of South Carolina ; and Washing- 
 ton, who had foreseen the issue, cheered Madison on with good 
 words : " Eight affirmatives without a negative carry weight 
 of argument if not eloquence with it that would cause even 
 * the unerring sister ' to hesitate." :j: 
 
 On the day appointed for the meeting of the convention a 
 quorum was present in Hichmond. It was auspicious that Ed- 
 mund Pendleton, the chancellor, was unanimously chosen its 
 president. The building which would hold the most listeners 
 was made the place of meeting, but Henry was alarmed at the 
 presence of short-hand reporters from the Philadelphia press, 
 as he wished " to speak the language of his soul " * without the 
 reserve of circumspection. During the period of the confedera- 
 tion, which had existed but Kttle more than seven years, it had 
 become known that slavery and its industrial results divided 
 the South from the North ; and this conviction exercised a sub- 
 tle influence. 
 
 George Mason, following the advice of Richard Henry 
 Lee, II and the precedent of Massachusetts, proposed that no 
 question relating to the constitution should be propounded 
 until it should have been discussed clause by clause ; and this 
 was acquiesced in unanimously. The debates which ensued 
 cannot be followed in the order of time, for Henry broke 
 through every rule ; but an outline must be given of those 
 which foreshadowed the future. 
 
 Patrick Henry dashed instantly into the battle, saying: 
 " The constitution is a severance of the confederacy. Its lan- 
 guage, ' "We the people,' is the institution of one great con- 
 solidated national government of the people of all the states, in- 
 stead of a government by cr>mpact with the states for its agents. 
 The people gave the convention no power to use their name." '^ 
 
 * Washington in Rives, ii., 54Y. 
 
 f Jefferson, Randolph's ed., ii., 270 ; in Rives, ii., 558. 
 
 t Washington to Sladison, 2 May 1788. * Penn. Packet, 12 June 1788. 
 
 II R. H. Lee to G. Mason, 7 May 1788. Life of R. H. L., ii., 89. 
 
 ^ Elliot, iii., 21-23. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTIOiT IN VIRGINIA. 427 
 
 "The question," said Ttandol]3li, "is now between union 
 and no union, and I would sooner lop off mj right arm than 
 consent to a dissolution of the union." ^^ " It is a national 
 government," said George Mason, losing Ids self-control and 
 becoming inconsistent. "It is ascertained by history that there . 
 never was one government ever a very extencive country' p 
 without destroying the liberties of the people. The power of 
 laying direct taxes changes the confederation. The general 
 government being paramount and more powerful, the state 
 governments must give way to it ; and a general consolidated 
 government is one of the worst curses that can befall a nation." f 
 
 " There is no quarrel between government and liberty," 
 said Pendleton ; " the former is the shield and protector of the 
 latter. The expression ' We the people ' is a common one, and 
 with me is a favorite. Who but the people can delegate pow- 
 ers, or have a right to form government ? The question must 
 be between this government and the confederation ; the latter 
 is no government at all. Common danger, union, and the 
 spirit of America carried us through the war, and not the con- 
 federation of which the moment of peace showed the imbecility. 
 Government, to be effectual, must have complete powers, aA 
 legislature, a judiciary, and executive, l^o gentleman in this 
 committee would agree to vest these three powers in one body. * 
 The proposed government is not a consolidated government. 
 It is on the whole complexion of it a government of laws and 
 not of men." J 
 
 Madison explained at large that the constitution is in part a 
 consolidated union, and in part rests so completely on the 
 states that its very life is bound up in theirs. And on another 
 day he added ; " The powers vested in the proposed govern- 
 ment are not so much an augmentation of powers in the general 
 government as a change rendered necessary for the purpose of 
 giving efficacy to those which were vested in it before." * 
 
 The opposition set no bounds to their eulogy of the British 
 constitution as compared with the proposed one for America. 
 " The wisdom of the English constitution," said Monroe, " has 
 given a share of the legislation to each of the three branches, 
 
 * Elliot, Hi., 25-26. f Elliot., iii., 29-33. X Elliot, iii., 35-41. 
 
 # Elliot, iii., 86-97, and 259. 
 
4:28 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; en. v. 
 
 which enables it to defend itself and to preserve the liberty of the 
 X, people. In the plan for America I can see no real checks." * 
 " We have not materials in this country," said Grayson, " for 
 such a government as the British monarchy ; but I would have 
 a president for life, choosing his successor at the same time ; a 
 senate for life, with the powers of the house of lords ; and a 
 triennial house of representatives, with the powers of the house 
 of commons in England." f " How natural it is," said Henry, 
 " when comparing deformities to beauty, to be stnick with the 
 superiority of the British government to the proposed system. 
 In England self-love, seK-interest stimulates the executive to 
 advance the prosperity of the nation. Men cannot be depended 
 on without self-love. Your president will not have the same 
 motives of self-love to impel ]iim to favor your interests. His 
 poHtical character is but transient. In the British government 
 / the sword and purse are not united in the same hands ; in this 
 system they are. Does not infinite security result from a sepa- 
 ration? "J 
 
 Madison on the fourteenth replied : " There never was, 
 there never will be, an efficient government in which both the 
 sword and purse are not vested, though they may not be given 
 to the same member of government. The sword is in the 
 hands of the British king ; the purse in the hands of the par- 
 liament. It is so in America, as far as any analogy can exist. 
 When power is necessary and can be safely lodged, reason 
 commands its cession. From the first moment that my mind 
 was capable of contemplating political subjects I have had a 
 uniform zeal for a well-regulated republican government. Tlie 
 estabhshment of it in America is my most ardent desire. If 
 the bands of the government be relaxed, anarchy will produce 
 despotism. Faction and confusion preceded the revolutions in 
 Germany ; faction and confusion produced the disorders and 
 commotions of Holland. In this commonwealth, and in every 
 state in the union, the relaxed operation of the government 
 has been sufficient to alarm the friends of their country. The 
 rapid increase of population strongly calls for a republican or- 
 ganization. There is more responsibility in the proposed gov- 
 ernment than in the English. Our representatives are chosen 
 
 * Elliot, iii., 218, 219. f Elliot, iii., 2V9. X Elliot, iii., 387, 388. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIKGINIA. 429 
 
 for two years, in England for seven. Any citizen may "be elected 
 here ; in Great Britain no one without an estate of the annual 
 value of six hundred pounds sterling can represent a county ; 
 nor a corporation without half as much. If confidence be due 
 to the government there, it is due tenfold here." * 
 
 Against the judiciary as constituted by the constitution 
 Henry on the twentieth exceeded himself in vehemence, find- 
 ing dangers to the state courts by the number of its tribunals, 
 by appellate jurisdictions, controversies between a state and 
 the citizens of another state ; dangers to the trial by jury ; dan- 
 gers springing out of the clause against the impairment of the 
 obligations of a contract. 
 
 On the same day Marshall, following able speakers on the 
 same side, summed up the defence of the judiciary system : 
 " Tribunals for the decisions of controversies, which were be- 
 fore either not at all or improperly provided for, are here ap- 
 pointed. Federal courts will determine causes with the same 
 fairness and impartiality as the state courts. The federal 
 judges are chosen with equal wisdom, and they are equally or 
 more independent. The power of creating a number of courts 
 is necessary to the perfection of this system. The jurisdiction 
 of the judiciary has its limit. The United States court cannot 
 extend to everything, since, if the United States were to make 
 a law not warranted by any of the enumerated powers, the 
 judges would consider it as an infringement of the constitu- 
 tion. The state courts are crowded with suits ; if some of 
 them should be carried to a federal court, the state courts will 
 still have business enough. To the judiciary you must look 
 for protection from an infringement on the constitution. ]^o 
 other body can afford it. The jurisdiction of the federal courts 
 over disputes between a state and the citizens of another state 
 has been decried with unusual vehemence. There is a diffi- 
 culty in making a state defendant which does not prevent its 
 being plaintiff. It is not rational to suppose that the sovereign 
 power should be dragged before a court. The intent is to ena- 
 ble states to recover claims against individuals residing in other 
 states. This construction is warranted by the words." 
 
 On the clause relating to impairing the obligation of con- 
 
 * Elliot, iii., 393-395. 
 
430 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION", b. iv. ; ch. v. 
 
 tracts, Marshall said tliis : '' A suit instituted in tlie federal 
 courts bj the citizens of one state against the citizens of another 
 state will be instituted in the court where the defendant resides, 
 and will be determined bj the laws of the state where the con- 
 tract was made. The laws which govern the contract at its 
 formation govern it at its decision. Whether this man or that 
 man succeeds is to the government all one thing. Congress 
 is empowered to make exceptions to the appellate jurisdiction 
 of the supreme court, both as to law and as to fact ; and these 
 exceptions certainly go as far as the legislature may think 
 proper for the interest and liberty of the people." * 
 
 The planters of Virginia were indebted to British mer- 
 chants to the amount of ten millions of dollars ; and the Yir- 
 ginid legislature, under tlie influence of Henry, had withheld 
 from these creditors the right to sue in the courts of Virginia 
 until England should have fulfilled her part of the treaty of 
 peace by surrendering the western posts and by making com- 
 pensation for slaves that had been carried away ; he now cen- 
 sured the federal constitution for granting in the case retro- 
 spective jurisdiction. Marshall replied : " There is a difference 
 between a tribunal which shall give effect to an existing right, 
 and creating a right that did not exist before. The debt or 
 claim is created by the individual ; a creation of a new court 
 does not amount to a retrospective law." f 
 
 Questions as to the powers which it would be wise to grant 
 to the general government, and as to the powers which had 
 been granted, dividod the convention. The decision of Mary- 
 land and South Carolina dashed the hope of proselyting Vir- 
 ginia to propose a separate southern confederacy ; but Henry 
 on the ninth still said : " Compared with the consolidation of 
 one power to reign with a strong hand over so extensive a 
 country as this is, small confederacies are little evils. Virginia 
 and N"orth Carolina could exist separated from the rest of 
 America." :j: But he limited himself to proposing that Vir- 
 ginia, " the greatest and most mighty state in the union," * 
 followed by North Carolina and by New York, which state he 
 announced as being in high opposition, || should hold the con- 
 
 * Elli )t, iii., 551-560. f Elliot, iii., 539, 546, 561. 
 
 t Elliot, iii., 161. « Elliot, iii., 142. B Elliot, iii., 157, 183. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 431 
 
 stitution in suspense until they liad compelled the other states 
 to adopt the amendments on which she should insist. He cited 
 Jefferson as advising " to reject the government till it should 
 be amended." * Randolph interpreted the letter which Henry 
 had cited, as the expression of a strong desire that the govern- 
 ment might be adopted by nine states with Virginia for one 
 of the nine ; f and two days later Pendleton cited from the 
 same letter the words that " a schism in our union would be 
 an incurable evil." :{: 
 
 On the eleventh and the seventeenth Mason introduced a 
 new theme, saying: "Under the royal government the im- 
 portation of slaves was looked upon as a great oppression ; but 
 the African merchants prevented the many attempts at its 
 prohibition. It was one of the great causes of our separation 
 from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object 
 of this state and most of the states in this union. The aug- 
 mentation of slaves weakens the states. Such a trade is dia- 
 bolical in itself and disgraceful to mankind ; yet by this con- 
 stitution it is continued for tw^enty years. Much as I value a 
 union of all the states, I would not admit the southern states 
 into the union unless they agree to its discontinuance. And 
 there is no clause in this constitution to secure the property of 
 that kind which w^e have acquired under our former laws, and 
 of which the loss would bring ruin on a great many people ; 
 for such a tax may be laid as will amount to manumission." * 
 
 Madison equally abhorred the slave-trade ; but on the seven- 
 teenth answered, after reflection and with reserve : " The gen- 
 tlemen of South Carolina and Georgia argued, ' By hindering 
 us from importing this species of property the slaves of Yir- 
 ginia will rise in value, and we shall be obliged to go to your 
 markets.' I need not expatiate on this subject ; great as the evil 
 is, a dismemberment of the union would be worse. Under the 
 articles of confederation the traffic might be continued forever ; 
 by this clause an end may be put to it after twenty years. 
 From the mode of representation and taxation, congress can- 
 not lay such a tax on slaves as will amount to manumission. 
 At present, if any slave elopes to any of those states where 
 
 * Elliot, lii., 152. t Elliot, ill., 304. 
 
 f Elliot, ill., 200. # Elliot, iii., 270, 452. 
 
1 
 
 432 THE STATES KATIFY THE CONSTITUTION". b.iv.;ch.v. 
 
 slaves are free, lie becomes emancipated by their laws ; in this 
 constitution a clause was expressly inserted to enable owners 
 of slaves to reclaim them." 
 
 Tyler supported Madison, speaking at large and with 
 warmth : " This wicked traffic is impolitic, iniquitous, and dis- 
 graceful. It was one cause of the complaints against British 
 tyranny ; nothing can justify its revival. But for this tem- 
 porary restriction, congress could have prohibited the African 
 trade. My earnest desire is that it should be handed down to 
 posterity, that I have opposed this wicked clause." * 
 
 On the twenty-fourth Henry raised a new cry on the dan- 
 ger of emancipation : " The great object of national govern- 
 ment is national defence ; the northern states may call forth 
 every national resource ; and congress may say, ' Every black 
 man must fight.' In the last war acts of assembly set free 
 every slave who would go into the army. Slavery is detested ; 
 we feel its fatal effects ; we deplore it with all the pity of hu- 
 manity. Let that urbanity which I trust will distinguish 
 Americans, and the necessity of national defence, operate on 
 their minds ; they have the power, in clear, unequivocal terms, 
 to pronounce all slaves free, and they will certainly exercise 
 the power. Much as I deplore slavery, I see that the general 
 government ought not to set the slaves free ; for the major- 
 ity of congress is to the North and the slaves are to the 
 South." t 
 
 The governor of Virginia first showed that the constitution 
 itself did not, even in the opinion of South Carolina, menace 
 enfranchisement ; and thus proceeded : " I hope that there is 
 no one here who, considering the subject in the calm light of 
 philosophy, will advance an objection dishonorable to Virginia ; 
 that, at the moment they are securing the rights of their citi- 
 zens, there is a spark of hope that those unfortunate men now 
 held in bondage may, by the operation of the general govern- 
 ment, be made free." J 
 
 The representative from Augusta county, Zachariah John- 
 son, complained that the bill of rights which the convention 
 was preparing as an amendment to the constitution did not ac- 
 knowledge that all men are by nature equally free and inde- 
 
 * Elliot, Hi., 453, 454, 455. f Elliot, iil., 590. t Elliot, iii., 598. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 433 
 
 pendent. " Gentlemen tell ns," he said, " that they see a pro- 
 gressive danger of bringing about emancipation. The total 
 aboHtion of slavery would do much good. The principle has 
 begun since the revolution. Let us do what we may, it will 
 come round." * 
 
 To the declamations of Henry that the adoption of the con- 
 stitution would be the renunciation of the right to navigate the 
 Mississippi, Madison, on the twelfth, after a candid relation of 
 what had transpired in congress, and giving the information 
 that New Jersey and Pennsylvania were now strenuous against 
 even any temporary cession of the navigation of that river, 
 made the further irrefragable reply : " The free navigation of 
 the Mississippi is our right. The confederation is so weak 
 that it has not formed, and cannot form, a treaty which will 
 secure to us the actual enjoyment of it. Under an efficient 
 government alone shall we be able to avail ourselves fully of 
 our right. The new government will have more strength to 
 enforce it." " Should the constitution be adopted," said Mon- 
 roe on the thirteenth, " the northern states will not fail to re- 
 linquish the Mississippi in order to depress the western country 
 and prevent the southern interest from preponderating." f 
 " To preserve the balance of American power," continued 
 Henry, " it is essentially necessary that the right of the Missis- 
 sippi should be secured, or the South will ever be a contempti- 
 ble minority." J 
 
 " This contest of the Mississippi," said Grayson on the four- 
 teenth, " is a contest for empire, in which Virginia, Kentucky, 
 the southern states are deeply interested. It involves this 
 great national question, whether one part of the continent shall 
 govern the other. From the extent of territory and fertility 
 of soil, God and nature have intended that the weight of popu- 
 lation should be on the southern side. At present, for various 
 reasons, it is on the other. If the Mississippi be shut up, emi- 
 grations will be stopped entirely ; no new states will be formed 
 on the western waters ; and this government will be a govern- 
 ment of seven states." # To the last Grayson said : " The 
 seven states, which are a majority, being actually in possession, 
 
 * Elliot, iii., 648. , % Elliot, iii., 352. 
 
 f Elliot, iii., 340. « Elliot, iii., 365, 366. 
 
 VOL. TI. — 28 
 
434 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 will never admit any soutliern state into the union so as to lose 
 that majority." '^ 
 
 The power of the government to establish a navigation act 
 by a bare majority was bitterly complained of by George Ma- 
 son ; t by Grayson, who complained that the interests of the 
 carrying states would govern the producing states ; :j: by Tyler, 
 who mourned over his own act in having proposed to cede the 
 regulation of commerce to the confederation, since it had led 
 to the grant of powers too dangerous to be trusted to any 
 set of men whatsoever.^ Complaint was further made that 
 treaties were to go into effect without regard to the opin- 
 ion of the house of representatives ; and especially that there 
 was no bill of rights, and that there was no explicit reserva- 
 tion of powers not delegated to the general government. In 
 some parts of the country the settlers were made to dread a 
 resuscitation of old land companies through the federal judi- 
 ciary. 
 
 The prohibition on the states to issue paper money weighed 
 on the minds of the debtor class ; but it was not much dis- 
 cussed, for on that point George Mason and Kichard Henry 
 Lee were the great leaders in favor of the suppression of paper 
 money " as founded upon fraud and knavery." || And Mason 
 had forced the assembly of Virginia in their last session to 
 adopt a series of resolutions declaring that paper currency 
 created scarcity of real money, and substituted for the real 
 standard of value a standard variable as the commodities them- 
 selves, ruining trade and commerce, weakening the morals 
 of the people, destroying public and private credit and all faith 
 between man and man, and aggravating the very evils which 
 it was intended to remedy.^ And yet there were those in the 
 convention whose votes were swayed by the consideration that, 
 if the constitution should be established, there would be an end 
 of inconvertible bills of credit forever. But that which af- 
 fected the decision more than anything else was that the con- 
 stitution would bring with it to British creditors a right to 
 
 * Elliot, iii., 585. f Elliot, iii., 604. 
 
 t Elliot, iii., 616. * Elliot, iii., 640, 641. 
 
 II George Mason to ^Ya3llington, 6 November lYSYjin Letters to G. W., iv., 190, 
 
 ^ Independent Gazetteer, 17 November 1*787. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIRGINIA. 435 
 
 recover tlirongli the federal courts claims on Virginia planters 
 for about ten millions of dollars. 
 
 The discussions had been temperately conducted till just 
 at the last, when for a moment pretending that the acceptance 
 of the constitution would make an end of the trial bj jury, 
 Henry said, on the twentieth : " Old as I am, it is probable I 
 may yet have the appellation of rebel. But my neighbors 
 will protect me." * This daring drew out the reply that 
 Virginia would be in arms to support the constitution ; and 
 on the twenty-fifth James Innes of Williamsburg, quoting 
 against him his own words, said : " I observe with regret a 
 general spirit of jealousy with respect to our northern brethren. 
 If we had had it in 1Y75 it would have prevented that unani- 
 mous resistance which triumphed over our enemies ; it was not 
 a Yirginian, a Carolinian, a Pennsylvanian, but the glorious 
 name of an American, that extended from one end of the con- 
 tinent to the other." f But the feeling was soon pacified, and 
 the last words of Henry himself were : "If I shall be in the 
 minority, I shall yet be a peaceable citizen, my head, my hand, 
 and my heart being at liberty to remove the defects of the 
 system in a constitutional way." J The last word was from 
 the governor of Yirginia ; " The accession of eight states re- 
 duces our deliberations to the single question of union or no 
 union." ^ 
 
 For more than three weeks the foes of the constitution had 
 kept up the onset, and day after day they had been beaten 
 back as cavalry that tries in vain to break the ranks of in- 
 fantry. For more than three weeks Henry and Grayson and 
 Mason renewed the onslaught, feebly supported by Monroe, 
 and greatly aided by the weight of character of Benjamin 
 Harrison and John Tyler ; day by day they were triumphantly 
 encountered by Madison, on whom the defence of the con- 
 stitution mainly rested; by Pendleton, who, in spite of in- 
 creased infirmities, was moved even more deeply than in the 
 beginning of the revolution ; and by the popular eloquence of 
 Kandolph. These three champions were well seconded by 
 
 * Elliot, iii., 546. t Elliot, iii., 652. 
 
 f Elliot, iii., 633. * Ibid. 
 
436 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION, b. iv. ; ch. v. 
 
 George ^Nicholas, Jolin Marshall, James Innes, Ilenrj Lee, 
 and Francis Corbin.* 
 
 On the twentj-fif th, after debates for three weeks, the mal- 
 contents had no heart for further resistance. The convention 
 was willing to recommend a bill of rights in twenty sections, 
 with twenty other more questionable amendments. The first 
 motion was : '' Ought the declaration of rights and amend- 
 ments of the constitution to be referred by this convention to 
 the other states in the American confederacy for their con- 
 sideration previous to the ratification of the new constitution 
 of government ? " It was lost, having only eighty voices 
 against eighty-eight. Then the main question was put, that 
 the constitution be ratified, referring all amendments to the 
 first congress under the constitution. The decision would be 
 momentous, not for America only, but the whole world. 
 "Without Virginia, this great country would have been shivered 
 into fragmentary confederacies, or separate independent states. 
 
 The roll was called ; and eighty-nine delegates, chiefly from 
 the cities of Richmond and Williamsburg, from counties near 
 the ocean, from the northern neck, from the north-western 
 border counties, and from the counties between the Blue Ridge 
 and the Alleghanies, voted for the constitution. Seventy-nine, 
 mainly from other central and southern border counties, and 
 from three fourths of the counties of Kentucky, cried 'No. 
 
 The committee for reporting the form of ratification were 
 Randolph, JSTicholas, Madison, Marshall, and Corbin — all from 
 among the stanchest supporters of the constitution. 
 
 In the form which was adopted they connected with the 
 ratification " a few declaratory truths not affecting the validity 
 of the act ; " f and shielded the rights of the states by the as- 
 sertion *' that every power not granted by the constitution re- 
 mains for the people of the United States and at their will." :j: 
 
 After the vote was taken, the successful party were careful 
 not to ruffle their opponents by exultation. Henry showed his 
 genial nature, free from all malignity. He was like a billow 
 of the ocean on the first bright day after the storm, dashing 
 itself against the rocky cliff, and then, sparkling with light, re- 
 
 * Compare Rives, ii., 561. 
 
 f Madison to Washington, in Rives, ii., 608. if Elliot, iii., 656. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN VIPwGINIA. 437 
 
 treating to its home. It was more difficult for Mason to calm 
 the morbid sensibility of his nature and to heal his sorrow at 
 having abandoned one of the highest places of honor among 
 the fathers of the constitution which he had done so much to 
 initiate, to form, and to improve. He was pacified by words 
 from Harrison and from Tyler, who held it the duty of good 
 citizens to accept the decision of the majority, and by precept 
 and example to promote harmony and order and union among 
 their fellow-citizens. But that which did most to soothe the 
 minority was their trust in Washington. " For the president," 
 said Mason, " there seldom or never can be a majority in favor 
 of one, except one great name, who wdll be unanimously elect- 
 ed." * " Were it not for one great character in America," 
 said Grayson, " so many men would not be for this govern- 
 ment. We do not fear while he lives ; but who beside him 
 can concentrate the confidence and affections of all Amer- 
 ica? "f And Monroe reported to Jefferson: "Be assured, 
 Washington's influence carried this government." J 
 
 Nor was that influence confined to Virginia alone. The 
 country was an instrument with thirteen strings, and the only 
 master who could bring out all their harmonious thought w^as 
 Washington. Had he not attended the federal convention, its 
 work would have met a colder reception and more strenuous 
 opponents. Had the idea prevailed that he would not accept 
 the presidency, it would still have proved fatal.* 
 
 Yirginia lost the opportunity of being the ninth state to 
 constitute the union. While the long winter of New Hamp- 
 shire intercepted the labors of husbandry, the fireside of the 
 freeholders in its hundreds of townships became the scene for 
 discussing the merits of the federal constitution with tlie dele- 
 gates of their choice and with one another. Their convention 
 reassembled in June. Four days served them to discuss the 
 constitution, to prepare and recommend twelve articles of 
 amendment, and, by fifty-seven voices against forty-six, to 
 ratify the constitution. They took care to insert in their 
 record that their vote w^as taken on Saturday, the twenty-first 
 
 * Elliot, iii., 493; and compare 134. | Elliot, iil., 610. 
 X Monroe to Jefferson, 12 July 17S8. 
 
 * Life of Morris by Sparks, i., 289, 230. 
 
438 THE STATES RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION", b. iv. ; on. v. 
 
 of June, at one o'clock in the afternoon, that Yirglnia by a 
 vote at a later hour of the same day might not dispute with 
 them the honor of giving life to the constitution.* 
 
 Bj their decision, accompanied by that of Virginia, the 
 United States of America came formally into existence. As 
 the glad tidings iiew through the land, the heart of its people 
 thrilled with joy that at last the tree of union was firmly 
 planted. Never may its trunk be riven by the lightning ; nor 
 its branches crash each other in the maddening storm ; nor its 
 beauty wither ; nor its root decay. 
 
 * Tobias Lear to Washicgton, 22 June 1788. Letters to "Washington, iv., 225. 
 
THE 
 
 FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 OF THE 
 
 UITITED STATES OF AMEEIOA 
 
 m FIVE BOOKS. 
 
 BOOK FIFTH. 
 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 
 
 June, 1787. 
 
^ 
 
CHAPTEK I. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION. 
 
 1787. 
 
 " The American constitution is tlie most wonderful T70rk 
 ever struck off at a given time by the brain and purpose of 
 man ; " but it bad its forerunners. 
 
 England bad suffered the thirteen colonies, as free states, 
 to make laws each for itself and never for one of the others ; 
 and had established their union in a tempered subordination to 
 the British crown. Among the many guides of America, 
 there had been Winthrop and Cotton, Hooker and Haynes, 
 George Fox and William Penn, Roger Williams and John 
 Clarke ; scholars of Oxford and many more of Cambridge ; 
 Gustavus Adolphus and Oxenstiern; the merchants of the 
 United Netherlands ; Southampton and Baltimore, with the 
 kindliest influences of the British aristocracy ; Shaftesbury 
 with Locke, for evil as well as for good ; all the great slave- 
 traders that sat on thrones or were fostered by parliament ; and 
 the philanthropist Oglethorpe, who founded a colony exclu- 
 sively of the free on a territory twice as large as France, and 
 though he had to mourn at the overthrow of his plans for 
 liberty, lived to see his plantation independent. 
 
 There were other precursors of the federal government; 
 but the men who framed it followed the lead of no theoretical 
 writer of their own or preceding times. They harbored no de- 
 sire of revolution, no craving after untried experiments. They 
 wrought from the elements which were at hand, and shaped 
 them to meet the new exigencies which had arisen. The least 
 possible reference was made by them to abstract doctrines; 
 
44:2 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; ch. i. 
 
 tliej moulded their design by a creative power of tlieir own, 
 but nothing was introduced that did not already exist, or was 
 not a natural development of a well-known principle. The 
 materials for building the American constitution were the gifts 
 of the ages. 
 
 Of old, the family was the rudiment of the state. Of the 
 Jews, the organization was by tribes. The citizens of the com- 
 monwealths of the Hellenes were of one blood. Among the 
 barbarous tribes of the fourth continent, the governments and 
 the confederacies all rested on consanguinity, l^ations, as the 
 word implied, were but large communities of men of one kin ; 
 and nationalities survive to this day, a source of strength in 
 their unity, and yet of strife where two or more of them exist 
 in their original separateness and are nevertheless held in sub- 
 jection under one ruler. Rome first learned to cherish the 
 human race by a common name and transform the vanquished 
 into citizens. 
 
 The process of assimilation which Eome initiated by war 
 received its perfect development in the land where the Dutch 
 and the Swedes, and in the country north-west of the Ohio the 
 French, competed in planting colonies ; where the English, the 
 L'ish, the Scotch for the most part came over each for himself, 
 never reproducing their original nationality ; and where from 
 the first fugitives from persecution of all nations found a safe 
 asylum. Though subjects of the English king, all were pres- 
 ent in America as individuals. 
 
 The English language maintained itself without a rival, not 
 merely because those speaking it as their mother tongue very 
 greatly outnumbered all others, and because all acknowledged 
 English supremacy ; but for the simplicity of its structure ; its 
 logical order in the presentment of thought ; its suitableness 
 for the purposes of every-day life ; for the discussion of ab- 
 stract truths and the apprehension of Anglo-Saxon political 
 ideas ; for the instrument of the common law ; for science and 
 observation ; for the debates of public life ; for every kind of 
 poetry, from humor to pathos, from descriptions of nature to 
 the action of the heart and mind. 
 
 But tlie distinctive character of the new people as a whole, 
 their nationahty, so to say, was the principle of individuality 
 
1T87. THE CONSTITUTION. 443 
 
 wliicli prevailed among tliem as it had nowhere done before. 
 This individuality was strengthened by the straggles with 'Na- 
 ture in her wildness, by the remoteness from the abodes of an- 
 cient institutions, by the war against the traditions of absolute 
 power and old superstitions, till it developed itself into the 
 most perfect liberty in thought and action ; so that the Ameri- 
 can came to be marked by tlio readiest versatility, the spirit of 
 enterprise, and the faculty of invention. In the declaration of 
 independence the representatives of the United States called 
 themselves " the good people of these colonies." The states- 
 men who drew the law of citizenship in 1776 made no distinc- 
 tion of nationalities, or tribes, or ranks, or occupations, or faith, 
 or wealth, and knew only inhabitants bearing allegiance to the 
 governments of the several states in union. 
 
 Again, this character of the people appeared most clearly 
 in the joint action of the United States in the federal conven- 
 tion, where the variant prejudices that still clung to separate 
 states eliminated each other. x 
 
 The constitution establishes nothing that interferes with^ 
 equality and individuality. It knows nothing of differences 
 by descent, or opinions, of favored classes, or legalized religion, 
 or the political power of property. It leaves the individual 
 alongside of the individual. No nationality of character could 
 take form, except on the principle of individuality,'so that the 
 mind might be free, and every faculty have the unlimited op- 
 portunity for its development and culture. As the sea is made 
 up of drops, American society is composed of separate, free, 
 and constantly moving atoms, ever in reciprocal action, advanc- 
 ing, receding, crossing, struggling against each other and with 
 each other ; so that the institutions and laws of the country rise 
 out of the masses of individual thought, which, like the waters 
 of the ocean, are rolling evermore. 
 
 The rule of individuality w^as extended as never before. 
 The synod of the Presbyterians of E'ew York and Philadel- 
 phia, a denomination inflexibly devoted to its own creed, in 
 their pastoral letter of May 1783, published their joy that " the 
 rights of conscience are inalienably secured and interwoven 
 with the very constitutions of the several states." Religion 
 was become avowedly the attribute of man and not of a cor- 
 
444: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b.v.,-ch.i. 
 
 poration. In the earliest states known to history, government 
 and religion were one and indivisible. Each state had its 
 special deity, and of these protectors one after another might 
 be overthrown in battle, never to rise again. The Peloponne- 
 sian war grew ont of a strife about an oracle. Eome, as it 
 adopted into citizenship those whom it vanquished, sometimes 
 introduced, and with good logic for that day, the worship of 
 their gods. No one thought of vindicating liberty of religion 
 for the conscience of the individual till a voice in Judea, break- 
 ing day for the greatest epoch in the life of humanity by estab- 
 lishing for all mankind a pure, spiritual, and universal religion, 
 enjoined to render to Csesar only that which is Csssar's. The 
 rule was upheld during the infancy of this gospel for all men. 
 Ko sooner was the religion of freedom adopted by the chief of 
 the Homan Empire, than it was shorn of its character of uni- 
 versality and enthralled by an unholy connection with the unholy 
 state : and so it continued till the new nation — the least defiled 
 with the barren scoffings of the eighteenth century, the most 
 sincere believer in Christianity of any people of that age, the 
 chief heir of the reformation in its purest form — when it came 
 to establish a government for the United States, refused to treat 
 faith as a matter to be regulated by a corporate body, or having 
 a headship in a monarch or a state. 
 
 Vindicating the right of individuality even in religion, and 
 in religion above all, the new nation dared to set the example 
 of accepting in its relations to God the principle first divinely 
 ordained in Judea. It left the management of temporal things 
 to the temporal power ; but the American constitution, in har- 
 mony with the people of the several states, withheld from the 
 federal government the power to invade the home of reason, 
 the citadel of conscience, the sanctuary of the soul ; and not 
 from indifference, but that the infinite spirit < »f eternal truth 
 might move in its feedom and purity and power. 
 
 With this perfect individuality extending to conscience, 
 freedom should have belonged to labor. What though slavery 
 existed and still exists in the older states known to history, in 
 Egypt, in China, coming down continuously from an unknown 
 date ; what though Aristotle knew no mode of instituting a 
 republican household but with a slave ; and Julius Caesar, 
 
irsr. THE CONSTITUTION". 445 
 
 when Italy was perisliing by the vastness of its slave estates, 
 crowded tliem witli new hordes of captives ? What though 
 the slave-trade was greedily continued under the passionate 
 encouragement of the British parliament, and that in nearly 
 all of the continent of Europe slavery in some of its forms 
 prevailed ? In America, freedom of labor was the moral prin- 
 ciple of the majority of the people ; was established, or moving 
 toward immediate establishment, in a majority of the states ; 
 was by the old confederation, with the promptest and oft- 
 repeated sanction of the new government, irrevocably ordained 
 in all the territory for which the United States could at that 
 time make the law. The federal convention could not inter- 
 fere with the slave laws of the separate states ; but it was care- 
 ful to impose no new incapacitation on free persons of color ; 
 it maintained them in all the rights of equal citizenship ; it 
 granted those rights to the emancipated slave ; and it kept to 
 itself the authority to abolish the slave-trade instantly in any ter- 
 ritory that might be annexed ; in all other states and lands, at 
 the earliest moment for which it had been able to obtain power. 
 The tripartite division of government into legislative, 
 executive, and judicial, enforced in theory by the illustrious 
 Montesquieu, and practiced in the home government of every 
 one of the American states, became a part of the Constitution 
 of the United States, which derived their mode of instituting 
 it from their own happy experience. It was established by 
 the federal convention with a rigid consistency that went be- 
 yond the example of Britain, where one branch of the legis- 
 lature was still a court of appeal. Each one of the three de- 
 partments proceeded from the people, and each is endowed 
 with all the authority needed for its just activity. The presi- 
 dent may recommend or dissuade from enactments, and has a 
 limited veto on them ; but whatever becomes a law he must 
 execute. The power of the legislature to enact is likewise un- 
 controlled except by the paramount law of the constitution. 
 The judiciary passes upon every case that may be presented, 
 and its decision on the case is definitive ; but without further 
 authority over the executive or the legislature, for the conven- 
 tion had wisely refused to make the judges a council to either 
 of them. 
 
446 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b.v.;oh.i 
 
 Tripartite division takes place not only in tlie threefold 
 powers of government ; it is established as the mode of legis- 
 lation. There, too, three powers, proceeding from the people, 
 must concur, except in cases provided for, before an act of 
 legislation can take place. This tripartite division in the power 
 of legislation — so at the time wrote Madison, so thought all the 
 great builders of the constitution, so asserted John Adams 
 with vehemence and sound reasoning — is absolutely essential 
 to the success of a federal republic ; for if all legislative pow- 
 ers are vested in one man or in one assembly, there is despot- 
 ism ; if in two branches, there is a restless antagonism between 
 the two ; if they are distributed among three, it will be hard 
 to unite two of them in a fatal strife with the third. But tlie 
 executive, and each of the two chambers, must be so chosen as 
 to have a character and strength and popular support of its 
 own. The government of the United States is thoroughly a 
 government of the people. By the English aristocratic revo- 
 lution of 1688, made after the failure of the popular attempt 
 at reform, the majority of the house of commons was in sub- 
 stance composed of nominees of the house of lords, so that no 
 ministry could prevail in it except by the power of that house ; 
 and as the prime minister and cabinet depend on the majority 
 in the house of commons, the house of lords directly controlled 
 the government not only in its own branch but in the com- 
 mons, and through the commons in the nomination of the min- 
 istry. All three branches of the government were in harmony, 
 for in those days, before the house of commons had entered 
 successfully upon its long struggle for reform of the mode of 
 its election, all three branches represented the aristocracy. In 
 the United States, on the other hand, all the branches of power 
 — president, senators, and representatives — ^proceed directly or 
 indirectly from the people. The government of the United 
 States is a government by the people, for the people. 
 
 To perfect the system and forever prevent revohition, 
 power is reserved to the people by amendments of their con- 
 stitution to remove every imperfection which time may lay 
 bare, and adapt it to unforeseen contingencies. But no change 
 can be hastily made. An act of parliament can at any time 
 alter the constitution of England; no similar power is dele- 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION-. 447 
 
 gated to the congress of the United States, which, like parlia- 
 ment, may be swayed by the shifting majorities of party. As 
 to the initiation of amendments, it could not be intrusted to 
 the president, lest it might lead him to initiate changes for his 
 own advantage ; still less to a judiciary holding office for hfe, 
 for, such is human nature, a tribunal so constituted and decid- 
 ing by a majority, by whatever political party its members 
 may have been named, cannot safely be invested with so tran- 
 scendent a power. The legislatures of the states or of the 
 United States are alone allowed to open the " constitutional 
 door to amendments ; " and these can be made valid only 
 through the combined intervention of the state legislatures 
 and of congress, or a convention of all the states elected ex- 
 pressly for the purpose by the people of the several states. In 
 this way no change of the constitution can be made in haste or 
 by stealth, but only by the consent of three quarters of the 
 states after a full and free and often-repeated discussion. 
 There is no legal road to amendment of the constitution but 
 through the consent of the people given in the form prescribed 
 by law. America, being charged with the preservation of lib- 
 erty, has the most conservative polity in the world, both in its 
 government and in its people. 
 
 The new nation asserted itself as a continental republic. 
 The discovery was made that the time had passed for little 
 commonwealths of a single city and its environs. The great 
 Frederick, who had scoffed at the idea of attempting to gov- 
 ern an imperial domain without a king, was hardly in his 
 grave when a commonwealth of more than twenty degrees in 
 each direction, containing from the iirst an area six or seven 
 times as large as the whole of Great Britain and Ireland, fifty 
 or sixty times as great as the Netherlands or Switzerland, able 
 to include more than a thousand confederacies as large as the 
 Achaian, and ready to admit adjoining lands to fellowship, 
 rose up in the best part of the temperate zone on a soil that 
 had been collecting fertility for untold centuries. The day of 
 the Greek commonwealth had passed forever ; and, after the 
 establishment of the representative system, it was made known 
 that a republican government thrives best in a vast territory. 
 Monarchy had held itself a necessity for the formation of large 
 
448 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; ch. i. 
 
 states ; but now it was found out that even in them monarchy 
 can be dispensed with ; and the world w^as summoned to gaze 
 at the spectacle of a boundless society of republican states in 
 union. 
 
 The United States of America are not only a republic, they 
 are " a society of societies," " a federal republic." * Toward 
 foreign powers the country has no seam in its garment ; it 
 exists in absolute unity as a nation, with full and undisputed 
 national resources. At home it is '' a union," or ''one out of 
 many ; " ydthhi its own sphere supreme and self-supporting. 
 For this end it has its own legislature to make enactments ; its 
 own functionaries to execute them ; its own courts ; its own 
 treasury ; and it alone may have an army and a navy. All- 
 sufficient powers are so plainly given that there is no need of 
 striving for more by straining the words in which they are 
 granted beyond their plan and natural import. 
 
 The constitution, the laws of the United States made in 
 pursuance of it, and all treaties framed by their authority, are 
 the supreme law of the land, binding the judges in every state 
 even if need be in spite of the constitution and the laws of the 
 state ; and all executive, legislative, and judicial officers, both 
 of the United States and of the several states, are to be sworn 
 to its support. The constitution provides within itself for the 
 redress of every wrong. The supreme court offers relief in a 
 " case " of injustice or conflict with the constitution ; the 
 remedy for a bad law is to be sought through the freedom and 
 frequency of elections; a fault in the constitution by its 
 amendment. 
 
 Except for the powers granted to the federal government, 
 each state is in all things supreme, not by grace, but of right. 
 The United States may not interfere with any ordinance or law 
 that begins and ends within a state. This supremacy of the 
 states in the powers which have not been granted is as essen- 
 tially a paii; of the system as the supremacy of the general 
 government in its sphere. The states are at once the guard- 
 ians of the domestic security and the happiness of the in- 
 dividual, and they are the parents, the protectors, and the stay 
 of the union. The states and the United States are members 
 
 * Words used by Montesquieu, Esprit dcs Lois, livre ix., cb. i. 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION. 449 
 
 of one great whole ; and the one is as needful as the othsr. 
 The powers of government are not divided between them ; 
 they are distributed ; so that there need be no collision in their 
 exercise. The union without self -existent states is a harp with- 
 out strings ; the states without union are as chords that are un- 
 strung. Bat for state rights the union would perish from the 
 paralysis of its limbs. The states, as they gave life to the 
 union, are necessary to the continuance of that life. Within 
 their own limits they are the guardians of industry, of proper- 
 ty, of personal rights, and of liberty. But state rights are to 
 be defended inside of the union ; not from an outside citadel 
 from which the union may be struck at or defied. The states 
 and the United States are not antagonists ; the states in union 
 form the federal republic ; and the system can have life and 
 health and strength and beauty only by their harmonious ac- 
 tion. In short, the constitution knows nothing of United 
 States alone, or states alone ; it adjusts the parts harmoniously 
 in an organized unity. Impair the relations or the vigor of 
 any part, and disease enters into the veins of the whole. That 
 there may be life in the whole, there must be healthy life in 
 every part. The United States are the states in union ; these 
 are so inwrought into the constitution that the one cannot per- 
 ish without the other. 
 
 Is it asked who is the sovereign of the United States^ 
 The words " sovereign " and " subjects " are unknown to the 
 constitution. There is no place for princes with unlimited\ 
 power, or conquering cities, or feudal chiefs, or privileged aris- 
 tocracies, ruling absolutely with their correlative vassals or 
 subjects. 
 
 The people of the United States have declared in their con- 
 stitution that the law alone is supreme ; and have defined that 
 supreme law. Is it asked who are the people of the United 
 States that instituted the " general government " ? Tlie fed- 
 eral convention and the constitution answer, that it is the con- 
 curring people of the several states. The constitution is con- 
 stantly on its guard against permitting the action of the 
 aggregate mass as a unit, lest the whole people, once accus- 
 tomed to acting together as an individual, might forget the 
 existence of the states, and the states now in union succumb to 
 
 VOL. VI. — 29 
 
450 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; ch. i. 
 
 eentrallzation and absolutism. The people of the states de- 
 manded a federal convention to form the constitution ; the 
 congress of the confederation, voting by states, authorized that 
 federal convention ; the federal convention, voting likewise by 
 states, made the constitution ; at the advice of the federal con- 
 vention the federal congress referred that constitution severally 
 to the people of each state ; and by their united voice taken 
 severally it was made the binding form of government. The 
 constitution, as it owes its life to the concurrent act of the peo- 
 ple of the several states, permits no method of amending itself 
 except by the several consent of the people of the states ; and 
 within the constitution itself the president, the only officer 
 who has an equal relation to every state in the union, is elected 
 not by the aggregate people of all the states, but by the sepa- 
 rate action of the people of the several states according to the 
 number of votes allotted to each of them. 
 
 Finally, there is one more great and happy feature in the 
 constitution. Eome, in annexing the cities around itself, had 
 not given them equal influence with itself in proportion to 
 their wealth and numbers, and consequently there remained a 
 cause of dissatisfaction never healed. America has provided 
 for admission of new states upon equal terms, and only upon 
 equal terms, with the old ones. 
 
 For Europe there remained the sad necessity of revolution. 
 For America the gates of revolution are shut and barred and 
 bolted down, never again to be thrown open ; for it has found 
 a legal and a peaceful w^ay to introduce every amelioration. 
 Peace and intercitizenship and perfect domestic free-trade are 
 to know no end. The constitution is to the American people 
 a possession for all ages ; it creates an indissoluble union of im- 
 perishable states. 
 
 The federal republic will carry tranquillity, and freedom, 
 and order throughout its vast domain. Will it, within less 
 than a century, extend its limits to the capes of Florida, to the 
 mouth of the Mississippi, to the region beyond the Mississippi, 
 •to California, to Oregon, to San Juan ? Will it show all the 
 Spanish colonies how to transform themselves into independ- 
 ent republics stretching along the Pacific till they turn Cape 
 Horn ? Will it be an example to France, teaching its great 
 
1787. THE CONSTITUTION. 45I 
 
 benefactor how to gain free institutions? In the country 
 from which it broke away will it assist the hberal statesmen to 
 bring parliament more nearly to a representation of the peo- 
 ple ? Will it help the birthplace of the reformation to gather 
 together its scattered members and become once more an em- 
 pire, with a government so entirely the child of the nation 
 that it shall have but one hereditary functionary, with a fed- 
 eral council or senate representing the several states, and a 
 house elected directly by universal suffrage? Will it teach 
 England herself how to give peace to her groups of colonies, 
 her greatest achievement, by establishing for them a federal 
 republican dominion, in one continent at least if not in more ? 
 And will America send manumitted dark men home to their 
 native continent, to introduce there an independent republic 
 and missions that may help to civilize the races of Africa? 
 
 The philosophy of the people of the United States was 
 neither that of optimism nor of despair. Believing in the 
 justice of "the Great Governor of the world," and conscious 
 of their own honest zeal in the cause of freedom and mankind, 
 they looked with astonishment at their present success and at 
 the future with unclouded hope. 
 
4.52 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; on. ii. 
 
 CHAPTEE II. 
 
 THE LINGEKma STATES. 
 
 1787 TO 2 August 1788. 
 
 When the constitution was referred to the states Hamilton 
 revived a long-cherished plan, and, obtaining the aid of Jay 
 and Madison, issued papers which he called The Federalist, to 
 prepare all the states and the people for accepting the deter- 
 minations of the federal convention. Of its eighty-five num- 
 bers. Jay wrote Hve, Madison twenty-nine, and Hamilton fifty- 
 one.* They form a work of enduring interest, because they are 
 
 * Mr. Madison's list of the authors of The Federalist : 
 Number 1 by A. H. No. 2, J. J. No. 3, J. J. No. 4, J. J. No. 5, J. J. 
 
 No. 6, A. U. No. 7, A. H. No. 8, A. II. No. 9, A. II. No. 10, J. M. No. 1 1, A. H. 
 No. 12, A. II. No. 13, A. H. No. 14, J. M. No. 15, A. H. No. 16, A. H. No. 17, A. H. 
 
 No. 18, J. M. No. 19, J. M. No. 20, J. M. No. 21, A. II. No. 22, A. II. No. 23, A. H. 
 No. 24, A. H. No. 25, A. II. No. 26, A. II, No. 27, A. II. No. 28, A. H. No. 29, A. H. 
 No. 30, A. H. No. 31, A. H. No. 32, A. H. No. 33, A. IT. No. 34, A. II. No. 35, A. H. 
 No. 36, A. H. No. 37, J. M. No. 38, J. M. No. 89, J. M. No. 40, J. M. No. 41, J. M. 
 No. 42, J. M. No. 43, J. M. No. 44, J. M. No. 45, J. M. No. 46, J. M. No. 47, J. M. 
 No. 48, J. M. No. 49, J. M. No. 50, J. M. No. 51, J. M. No. 52, J. M. No. 53, J. M. 
 No. 54, J. M. No. 55, J. M. No. 56, J. M. No. 57, J. M. No. 58, J. M. No. 59, A. H. 
 No. 60, A. IT. No. 61, A. H. No. 62, J. M. No. 63, J. M. No. 64, J. J. No. 65, A. II. 
 No. 66, A. H. No. 67, A. II. No. 68, A. II. No. 69, A. II. No. 7^,'A. II. No. 71, A. H. 
 No. 72, A. IT, No. 73, A. II. No. 74, A. H. No 75, A. H. No. 76, A. H. No. 77, A. II. 
 No. 78, A. H. No. 79, A. H. No. 80, A. IT., and to the end. 
 Note in Mr. Madisoii's ovm hand. 
 " No. 18 is attributed to Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Madison jointly. A. II. had 
 drawn up something on the subjects of this (No. IS) and the two next Ncs. (19 
 and 20). On finding that J. M. was engaged in them with larger materials, and 
 with a view to a more precise delineation, he put what he had written into the 
 hands of J. M. It is possible, though not recollected, that something in the 
 draught may have been incorporated into the numbers as printed. But it was 
 certainly not of a nature or amount to affect the impression left on the mind of 
 
1787-1788. THE FEDERALIST. 453 
 
 the earliest commentary on tlie new experiment of mankind in 
 establishing a republican government for a country of bound- 
 less dimensions ; and were written by Madison, who was the 
 chief author of the constitution, and Hamilton, who took part 
 in its inception and progress. 
 
 Hamilton dwelt on the defects of the confederation ; the 
 praiseworthy energy of the new federal government ; its rela- 
 tions to the public defence ; to the functions of the executive ; 
 to the judicial department, to the treasury ; and to commerce. 
 Himself a friend to the protection of manufactures, he con- 
 demned " exorbitant duties on imported articles," because they 
 " beget smuggling," are '' always prejudicial to the fair trader, 
 and eventually to the revenue itself ; " tend to render " other 
 classes of the community tributary in an improper degree to 
 the manufacturing classes," and to "give them a premature 
 monopoly of the markets ; " to " force industry out of its most 
 natural channels," and to " oppress the merchant." * 
 
 Madison commented with severe wisdom on its plan ; its 
 conformity to republican principles; its powers; its relation 
 to slavery and the slave-trade ; its mediating office between the 
 union and the states ; its tripartite separation of the depart- 
 
 J. M., from whose pen the papers went to the press, that they were of the class 
 written by him. As the histoiical materials of A. II., as far as they went, were 
 doubtless similar, or the same with those provided by J. M., and as a like applica- 
 tion of them probably occurred to both, an impression might be left on the mind 
 of A. H. that the Nos. in question were written jointly. These remarks are made 
 as well to account for a statement to that effect, if made by A. H., as in justice to 
 J. M., who, always regarding; them in a different light, had so stated them to an 
 inquiring friend, long before it was known or supposed that a different impres- 
 sion existed anywhere. (Signed) J. M." 
 
 There exists no list of the authors of The Federalist by the hand of Hamilton. 
 There exists no authentic copy of any list that may liave been made by Hamilton. 
 It is a great wrong to Hamilton's memory to insist that he claimed the authorship 
 of papers which were written for him at his request by another, and which the 
 completcst evidence proves that he could not have written. The list of the au- 
 thors of the several papers given above rests on the written authority of Madison. 
 From this list JIadison has never been known to vary in the slightest degree. The 
 correctness of his statement is substantiated beyond room for a cavil by various 
 evidence. Meeting an assertion that Madison in some paper in the department of 
 state had changed one figure in his list, I requested a former secretary of state 
 to order a search to be made for it. A search was made, and no such paper was 
 found. * The Federalist, xxxv. 
 
454 THE FEDERAL GOYERNMEIs^T. b. v. ; en. ii. 
 
 ments ; and its mode of constructing the house of representa- 
 tives. Hamilton began the work by saying that a wrong deci- 
 sion would not only be ^' the dismemberment of the union," 
 but " the general misfortune of mankind ; " ''' he closed with 
 the words : " A nation without a national government is an 
 awful spectacle. The establishment of a constitution, in time 
 of profound peace, by the voluntary consent of a whole people, 
 is a prodigy, to the completion of wliich I look forward with 
 trembling anxiety." f During the time in which the consti- 
 tution was m jeopardy Hamilton and Madison cherished for 
 each other intimate and affectionate relations, differing in tem- 
 perament, but one in purpose and in action. To the day of 
 their death they both were loyally devoted to the cause of 
 miion. 
 
 JSTew York, having the most convenient harbor for world- 
 wide commerce, rivers flowing directly to the sea, to Delaware 
 bay, to the Chesapeake, to the Mississippi, and to the water- 
 course of the St. Lawrence, and having the easiest line of com- 
 munication from the ocean to the great West, needed, more 
 than any other state, an efficient general government ; and yet 
 of the thirteen it was the most stubborn in opposition. More 
 than half the goods consumed in Connecticut, in ]^ew Jersey, 
 in Vermont, and the western parts of Massachusetts, were 
 bought within its limits and paid an impost for its use. :|: Dur- 
 ing the war it agreed to give congress power to collect a five 
 per-cent impost ; as soon as it regained possession of the city 
 it preferred to appropriate the revenue to its own purposes ; 
 and, as a consequence, the constitution called forth in ^New 
 York the fiercest resistance that selfish interests could organize. 
 
 To meet the influence of The Federalist, the republicans 
 published inflammatory tracts, and circulated large editions of 
 the Letters from the Federal Farmer by Richard Henry Lee. 
 They named themselves federal republicans. Their election- 
 eering centre was the 'New York custom-house, then an insti- 
 tution of the state with John Lamb as collector. After the 
 fashion of the days of danger they formed a committee of 
 correspondence and sought connections throughout the land. 
 
 * The Federalist, i. f The Federalist, Ixxxv. 
 
 $ Williamson to Iredell, 1 July 1788. McKee's Iredell, ii., 227, 228. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN NEW YORK. 455 
 
 They sent their own emissaries to attend the proceedings of 
 the Massachusetts convention, and, if possible, to frustrate its 
 acceptance of the union. Their letters received answers from 
 Lowndes, from Henry and Grayson, from Atherton of ISTew 
 Hampshire, and from Richard Henry Lee, who told tliem that 
 " the constitution was an elective despotism." 
 
 At the regular meeting of the legislature in January 1788, 
 Clinton recommended the encouragement of commerce and of 
 manufactures, but sent in the proceedings of the federal con- 
 vention without remark.'^ All others remaining silent for 
 twenty days, Egbert Benson, on the last day of January, pro- 
 posed a state convention in the precise mode recommended by 
 congress. Schoonmaker offered a preamble, condemning the 
 federal convention for having exceeded its powers. Benson 
 conducted the debate with rare abihty, and the amended pre- 
 amble gained but twenty-five votes against twenty-seven. In 
 the senate the motion to postpone the question mustered but 
 nine votes against ten. The convention was ordered ; but in 
 its choice the constitutional qualifications of electors v/ere 
 thrust aside, and every free male citizen of twenty-one years 
 of age, though he had been a resident but for a day, might be 
 a voter and be voted for. 
 
 According to the wish of the Virginia opposition, the time 
 for the meeting of the convention was delayed till the seven- 
 teenth of June. Of its sixty-five members, more than two 
 thirds were enemies to the constitution. f But it was found 
 that the state was divided geographically. The seat of oppo- 
 sition was in Ulster county, the home of Governor Clinton, and 
 it extended to the coimties above it. The southern counties 
 on the Hudson river and on Long Island, and the city of ISTew 
 York, were so unanimously for union as to encourage the rumor 
 that they would at all events adhere to it. Clinton himself 
 began to think it absolutely necessary that the state should in 
 some form secure a representation under the new constitution. 
 
 The greater number of his friends were, like him, aversp 
 to its total rejection ; but, while some were willing to be con- 
 tent with recommendatory amendments, and others with ex- 
 planatory ones, to settle doubtful constructions, the majority 
 
 * Ind. Gazetteer, 19 January lYSS. f Uamilton, i., 454. 
 
456 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; en. ii. 
 
 seemed "anwillmg to be reconciled with less than previous 
 amendments. All the while the people of the state were drift- 
 ing toward union.* 
 
 On the seventeenth of June, fifteen days after tlie organi- 
 zation of the Virginia convention, that of New York met at 
 Ponghkeepsie and unanimously elected Clinton as its president. 
 Among the delegates of the city of 'New York were Jay, Chief- 
 Justice Morris, Hobart, Livingston, tiien chancellor of the state, 
 Duane, and Hamilton. On the other side the foremost men 
 were George Clinton, the governor ; Yates and Lansing, who 
 had deserted the federal convention under the pretence that it 
 was exceeding its power ; Samuel Jones, a member of the New 
 York bar, who excelled in clearness of intellect, moderation, and 
 simplicity of character ; and Melancthon Smith, a man of a 
 religious cast of mind, familiar with metaphysical discussions, of 
 undaunted courage, and gifted with the power of moderation.f 
 
 On the nineteenth the chancellor opened the debate, show- 
 ing the superiority of a republic to a confederacy. Without a 
 strong federal government and union New York was incapable 
 of self-defence, and the Bricish posts within the limits of the 
 state would continue to form connections with hostile tribes 
 of Indians, and be held in defiance of the most solemn treaties. 
 
 In the course of the discussion every objection that had 
 been made to the constitution either in Massachusetts or in 
 Virginia was strongly stated ; and replied to. Lansing, adher- 
 ing to the system of the confederation, loved union ; but pro- 
 fessed to love liberty more. :j: Melancthon Smith declared him- 
 self most strongly impressed with the necessity of union, and 
 refused to say that the federal constitution was at war with 
 public liberty. Hamilton, speaking in the spirit of gentleness 
 and wisdom, contrasted the method of requisitions to be en- 
 forced by coercion of the states, with general laws operating 
 directly on individuals ; and he showed how greatly the new 
 system excelled in simplicity, in efiiciency, in respect for per- 
 sonal rights, in the protection of the public liberty, and, above 
 all, in humanity. 
 
 On the twenty-fourth swift riders, dispatched by Langdon, 
 
 * Compare Jay's Jay, i., 268. 
 
 f Thompson's Long Island, ii., 504, 505, 495. | Elliot, ii., 208-216, 219. 
 
1T88. THE CONSTITUTION IN NEW YORK. 457 
 
 brought to Hamilton the tidings that New Hampshire as the 
 ninth state had assented to the constitution ; jet tlie vote did 
 not decide New York. " Our chance of success depends upon 
 you," wrote Hamilton to Madison. '^ Symptoms of relaxation 
 in some of the leaders authorize a gleam of hope if you do 
 well, but certainly I think not otherwise." * 
 
 Clinton claimed that he and his own partisans were " the 
 friends to the rights of mankind ; " their opponents " the ad- 
 vocates of despotism ; " " the most that had been said by the 
 new government men had been but a second edition of The 
 Federalist well delivered. One of the New York delegates," 
 meaning Hamilton, " had in substance, though not explicitly, 
 thrown off the mask, his arguments tending to show the neces- 
 sity of a consolidated continental government to the exclusion 
 of any state government." 
 
 On the twenty-seventh Hamilton replied by a full declara- 
 tion of his opinions. " The establishment of a republican gov- 
 ernment on a safe and solid basis is the wish of every honest 
 man in the United States, and is an object, of all others, the 
 nearest and most dear to my own heart. This great purpose 
 requires strength and stability in the organization of the gov- 
 ernment, and vigor in its operations. The state governments 
 are essentially necessary to the form and spirit of the general 
 system.f With the representative system a very extensive 
 country may be governed by a confederacy of states in w^hich 
 the supreme legislature has only general powers, and the civil 
 and domestic concerns of the people are regulated by the laws 
 of the several states. State governments must form a leading 
 principle. They can never lose their powers till the whole 
 people of America are robbed of their liberties." :j: 
 
 In answer to Hamilton on this and two other occasions, 
 Clinton carefully set forth the principles on which he reposed. 
 During the war he had wished for a strong federal govern- 
 ment ; he still wished a federal republic for the mutual pro- 
 tection of the states and the security of their equal rights. In 
 
 * Hamilton's Works, i., 462. 
 
 f Elliot, ii., 301, 304. For Hamilton's brief of his speeches in June [not of 
 those in July], see Hamilton, ii., 463-466. 
 X Elliot, ii., 352-355. 
 
458 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. B.v.;cn.ii. 
 
 sucli a confederacy there slioiild be a perfect representation ; 
 but of that representation "the states are the creative princi- 
 ple," and, having eqnal rights, ought for their protection to be 
 equally represented. The delegates and the senators of a state 
 should be subject to its instructions and liable to be recalled at 
 its pleasure, for the representation should be an exact and con- 
 tinuous representation of its reflection and judgment and will. 
 Moreover, the senators should vote in their place not as indi- 
 viduals, but collectively, as the representation of the state. 
 He would further have the members of congress depend on the 
 states for support. Above all, he abhorred the idea of reducing 
 the states to the degraded situation of petty corporations and 
 rendering them liable to suits. " The sovereignty of the states 
 he considered the only stable security for the liberties of the 
 people against the encroachments of power." * 
 
 On the tliird of July, while the convention was still engaged 
 in considering the constitution, and noting the propositions of 
 amendments, the decisive news of the unconditional ratification 
 of the constitution by Yirginia broke on its members ; and 
 from that moment it was certain that they would not venture 
 to stand alone against the judgment of every state in JS^ew 
 England except Ehode Island, and every other state except 
 North Carolina. ! The question at first became whether the 
 constitution should be accepted with or without previous 
 amendments. On the tenth Lansing offered a bill of rights, to 
 which no one objected ; and numerous amendments,f of which 
 the class relating to a standing army in time of peace, direct 
 taxes, the miiitia, and elections to congress were made con- 
 ditions of the ratification. After they were read, the conven- 
 tion, on the proposal of Lansing, adjourned, leaving an informal 
 committee of equal numbers of both parties to bring the busi- 
 ness by compromise to a quick and friendly decision. In the 
 committee Jay declared that the word " conditional " must be 
 erased before any discussion of the merits of the amendments. 
 As this point was refused, the committee was dissolved ; but 
 
 * This summary of three speeches made by Clinton, one in June, two in July 
 after Virginia had been heard from, is compiled from the manuscripts of Clinton 
 preserved in the state library at Albany. 
 
 t Penn. Packet, 18 July nsS; Ind. Gazetteer, 18 July 1T88. 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN NEW YORK. 459 
 
 already Melanctlion Smith and Samuel Jones showed signs of 
 relenting. 
 
 On the eleventh Jay, taking the lead, moved the ratifica- 
 tion of the constitution and the recommendation of amend- 
 ments. After a long debate, Melancthon Smitli interposed 
 with a resolution which meant in substance that New York 
 would join the union, reserving the right to recede from it if 
 the desired amendments sliould not be accepted. Against this 
 motion Hamilton, after vainly proposing a form of ratifica- 
 tion* nearly similar to that of Virginia, spoke on Saturday, 
 the nineteenth, with such prevailing force that Smith con- 
 fessed himself persuaded to relinquish it. At this Lansing 
 revived the proposition to enter the union, but only with a re- 
 served right to withdraw from it ; and on the following Mon- 
 day the question might be taken. f Madison having resum.ed 
 his place in congress, Hamilton wrote in all haste for his ad- 
 vice. On Sunday, Madison speeded an answer to Poughkeep- 
 sie, and on the morning of Monday, the twenty-first, Hamilton 
 read to the convention its words, which were as follows : 
 
 " My opinion is, that a reservation of a right to withdraw, 
 if amendments be not decided on under the form of the con- 
 stitution within a certain time, is a conditional ratification ; 
 that it does not make JSTew York a member of the new union, 
 and, consequently, that she could not be received on that 
 plan. The constitution requires an adoption in toto and for- 
 ever. It has been so adopted by the other states. An adop- 
 tion for a limited time would be as defective as an adoption of 
 some of the articles only. In short, any condition whatever 
 must vitiate the ratification. The idea of reserving a right 
 to withdraw was started at Kichmond, and considered as a 
 conditional ratification, which was itself abandoned as worse 
 than a rejection." J 
 
 The voice of Yirginia, heard through Madison, was effect- 
 ive. Following the example of Massachusetts, and appro- 
 priating the words of its governor, on the twenty-third Samuel 
 
 * Hamilton, ii , 467-471. 
 
 f For the latter part of the convention there is need to resort to the Pcnn. 
 Packet and the Independent Gazetteer for July 1788, where details are given. 
 X Hamilton's Works, !., 465. 
 
d:60 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; en. ii. 
 
 Jones, supported hj Melancthon Smith, proposed, like Han- 
 cock, to make no "condition" and to ratify the constitution 
 " in full confidence " of the adoption of all needed amend- 
 ments. Lansing's motion for conditions was negatived in 
 committee by a vote of thirty-one to twenty-eight, and on 
 Friday, the twenty-iifth, the convention agreed to the report 
 of its committee of the whole in favor of the form of Samuel 
 Jones and Melancthon Smith by thirty yeas to twenty-five 
 nays, the largest vote on any close division during the whole 
 session. This vote was purchased at the price of consenting 
 to the unanimous resolution, that a circular letter be prepared 
 to be laid before the different legislatures of the United States 
 recommending a general convention to act upon the proposed 
 amendments of the different legislatures of the United States. 
 On Saturday, the twenty-sixth, the form of ratification of the 
 constitution was agreed to by a vote of thirty against twenty- 
 seven. More persons were absent from the vote than would 
 have been necessary to change it. On the following Monday 
 'New York invited the governors of the several states in the 
 union to take immediate and effectual measures for calling a 
 second federal convention to amend the constitution. "We 
 are unanimous," said Clinton, "in thinking this measure 
 very conducive to national harmony and good government." 
 Madison, as he read the letter, called the proposal a pestilent 
 one, and Washington was touched with sorrow at the thought 
 that just as the constitution was about to anchor in harbor it 
 might be driven back to sea. 
 
 But the city of New York set no bounds to its gladness at 
 the acceptance of the constitution ; the citizens paraded in a 
 procession unrivalled in splendor. The miniature ship which 
 was drawn through the streets bore the name of Hamilton. 
 For him this was his happiest moment of unclouded tri- 
 umph. 
 
 North Carolina held its convention before the result in 
 New York was known. The state wanted geographical unity. 
 A part of its territory west of the mountains had an irregular 
 separate organization under the name of Frankland. Of the 
 rest there was no natural centre from which a general opinion 
 could emanate ; besides, toward the general government the 
 
1788. THE CONSTITUTION IN NORTH CAROLINxV. 461 
 
 state was delinquent, and it had not yet shaken from itself the 
 bewildering influence of paper money. 
 
 " In this crisis," wrote Washington, ^* the wisest way for 
 IN'orth CaroHna will be to adjourn until the people in some 
 parts of the state can consider the magnitude of the question 
 and the consequences involved in it, more coolly and delib- 
 erately." * The convention, which consisted of two hundred 
 and eighty-four members, assembling on the twenty-first of 
 July, elected as its president Johnston, then governor of the 
 state, organized itself with tranquillity and dignity, and pro- 
 ceeded to discuss the constitution in committee, clause by 
 clause. The convention employed eight days in its able de- 
 bates, of which very full and fair accounts have been pre- 
 served. 
 
 First among the federalists,f and the master mind of the 
 convention, was James Iredell, who, before he was forty years 
 old, was placed by Washington on the supreme bench of the 
 United States. He was supported by William Eichardson 
 Davie, who had gained honor in the war and at the bar, and 
 afterward held high places in North Carolina and in the union ; 
 by Samuel Johnston, Archibald Maclaine, and Rlcliard Dobbs 
 Spaight. 
 
 The other side was led by Willie Jones of Halifax, noted 
 for wealth and aristocratic habits and tastes, yet by nature a 
 steadfast supporter of the principles of democracy. :j: He was 
 sustained by Samuel Spencer of Anson, a man of candor and 
 moderation, and as a debater far superior to his associates ; by 
 David Caldwell from Guilford, a Presbyterian divine, fertile 
 in theories and tenacious of them ; and by Timothy Eloodworth, 
 a former member of congress, who as a preacher abounded in 
 offices of charity, as a politician dreaded the subjection of 
 southern to northern interests. 
 
 The friends of the constitution had the advantage of spread- 
 ing their arguments before the people ; on the other side 
 Willie Jones, who held in his hand the majority of the con- 
 vention, citing the wish of Jefferson that nine states might 
 
 * Sparks, ix., 390, 391. 
 
 I McRce's Iredell, ii., 180-183; for instruction an invaluable work. 
 
 i McRee's Iredell, ii., 232 ; Moore's N. C, i., 384. 
 
462 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; en. ii. 
 
 ratify tlie constitution, and tlie rest hold aloof for amendments, 
 answered in this wise : " We do not determine on the consti- 
 tution ; we neither reject nor adopt it ; we leave ourselves at 
 liberty ; there is no doubt we shall obtain our amendments 
 and come into the union." 
 
 At his word the convention on the first of August deferred 
 the ratification of the constitution, and proposed amendments 
 by one hundred and eighty-four votes against eighty-four. 
 But harmony between the state and the new federal govern- 
 ment was pre-established by a rule adopted on the next day, 
 that any impost which congress might ordain for the union 
 should be collected in North Carolina by the state " for the use 
 of cono-ress." 
 
 o 
 
 The scales were ready to drop from the eyes of Rhode 
 Island. That state, although it had taken no part in the fed- 
 eral convention and for a year and more had neglected to at- 
 tend in congress, watched without disapprobation the great 
 revolution that was taking place. ^Neither of the two states 
 which lingered behind remonstrated against the establishment 
 of a new government before their consent ; nor did they ask 
 the United States to wait for them. The worst that can be 
 said of them is, that they were late in arriving. 
 
1788. THE GOVEPwNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. 463 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. 
 
 178S TO 5 May 17S9. 
 
 It was time for America to be known abroad as a nation. 
 The statesmen of France reproaclied her unsparingly for fail- 
 ing in her pecuniary engagements. Boatmen who bore the 
 flag of the United States on the father of rivers were fearlessly 
 arrested by Spain, while Don Gardoqui, its agent, in private 
 conversation tempted the men of Kentucky " to declare them- 
 selves independent " by the assurance that he was authorized 
 to treat with them as a separate power respecting commerce 
 and the navigation of the Mississippi.* 
 
 The colonists in Nova Scotia were already absorbing a part 
 of south-eastern Maine, and inventing false excuses for doing 
 so. Great Britain declined to meet her own obligations with 
 regard to the slaves whom she had carried away, and who 
 finally formed the seed of a Britisli colony at Sierra Leone. 
 She did not give up her negotiations with the men of Ver- 
 mont. She withheld the interior posts, belonging to the United 
 States ; in the commission for the government of Upper Cana- 
 da she kept out of sight the line of boundary, in order that the 
 commanding officer might not scruple to crowd the Americans 
 away from access to their inland water-line, and thus debar 
 them from their rightful share in the fur-trade. She was all 
 the while encouraging the Indian tribes within the bounds of 
 New York and to the south of the western lakes to assert their 
 independence. Hearing of the discontent of the Kentuckians 
 and the men of west North Carolina, she sought to foment the 
 
 * Letters to Washington, iv., 248. 
 
464: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; on. in. 
 
 passions which might hurrj them out of the union, as far as it 
 could be done without promising them protection. 
 
 In England John Adams had, in 1786, vainly explained the 
 expectation of congress that a British plenipotentiary minister 
 should be sent to the United States.* The bills regulating New- 
 foundland and intercourse with America were under the lead- 
 ership of the same Jenkinson who had prepared the stamp act ; 
 and, with the acquiescence of Pitt, the men and the principles 
 which had governed British policy toward America for most 
 of the last twenty years still prevailed.f In February 1788 
 the son of George Grenville, speaking for the ministry in the 
 house of commons, said : " Great Britain, ever since the peace, 
 has condescended to favor the United States." J Moreover, 
 the British government would take no notice of American 
 remonstrances against the violations of the treaty of peace. 
 Self-respect and patriotic pride forbade John Adams to re- 
 main. 
 
 Adams and Jefferson had exchanged with each other their 
 portraits, as lasting memorials of friendship ; and Adams, on 
 leaving Europe, had but two regrets : one, the opportunity of 
 research in books ; the other, that immediate correspondence 
 with Jefferson which he cherished as one of the most agreeable 
 events in his life. '^ A seven months' intimacy with him here 
 and as many weeks in London have given me opportunities of 
 studying him closely," wrote Jefferson to Madison. " He is 
 vain, irritable, and a bad calculator of the force and probable 
 effect of the motives which govern men. This is all the ill 
 which can possibly be said of him. He is disinterested, pro- 
 found in liis views, and accurate in his judgment, except 
 where knowledge of the world is necessary to form a judg- 
 ment. He is so amiable that you will love him, if ever you 
 become acquainted with him." * 
 
 In America the new constitution was rapidly conciliating 
 the affections of the people. Union had been held dear ever 
 since it was formed ; and novf that the constitution was its 
 
 * Adams to Carmarthen, 6 Febmary 17S6. 
 f Adams to Jay, 27 February 1786. 
 
 X Speech of Grenville, 11 February 1788. Almon's Parliamentary Register, 
 23, p. 179. * Jefferson, ii., 107. 
 
1788. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. 465 
 
 surest guarantee, no party could succeed wliicli did not inscribe 
 union, and with union the constitution, on its banner. In 
 September 1788 the dissidents of Pennsylvania held a con- 
 ference at Harrisburg. With the delegates from beyond the 
 mountains came Albert Gallatin, a native of Geneva, and edu- 
 cated there in a republic of a purely federal form. Their pro- 
 ceedings bear the marks of his mind. They resolved for 
 themselves and recommended to all others to acquiesce in the 
 organization of the government under " the federal constitu- 
 tion, of which the ratification had formed a new era in the 
 American world ; " they asked, however, for its speedy revision 
 by a general convention. All their actions were kept within 
 the bounds of legality."^ 
 
 In Virginia there had been a great vibration of opinion. 
 Its assembly, which met on the twentieth of October 1788, 
 was the first to take into consideration the proposal for another 
 federal convention. The enemies to the government formed a 
 decided majority of the legislature.f 'No one of its members 
 was able to encounter Patrick Henry in debate, and his edicts 
 were registered without opposition. :j: He had only to say, 
 " Let this be law," and it became law. Taking care to set forth 
 that so far as it depended on Virginia the new plan of govern- 
 ment would be carried into immediate operation, the assembly, 
 on the thirtieth, proposed a second federal convention, and in- 
 vited the concurrence of every other state.* Madison was 
 the fittest man in the union to be of the senate of the United 
 States : Henry, on the eighth of November, after pouring forth 
 a declamation against his federal principles, || nominated Kich- 
 ard Henry Lee and Grayson for the two senators from Vir- 
 ginia, and they were chosen at his bidding. He divided the 
 state into districts, cunningly restricting each of them to its 
 own inhabitants in the choice of its representative, and taking 
 care to compose the district in which Madison would be a 
 candidate out of counties which were thought to be unfriendly 
 
 * Life of Gallatin by Henry Adams, 11 ; Elliot, ii., 514. 
 f Madison, !., 436, 437. 
 
 i Washington to Madison, 11 November 1788. Tobias Lear to Langdon, 31 
 January 1789. 
 
 # Rives's Madison, ii., 646. i Madison, i., 443, 444. 
 
 VOL. VI. — 30 
 
4:QQ THE FEDERAL GOYERNMEISrT. b. y. ; oh. m. 
 
 to federalism. Assured by these iniquitous preparations, Mon- 
 roe, without scruple, took tlie field against Madison. 
 
 In Connecticut, in October, the circular letter of 'New York 
 bad a reading among other public communications, but "no 
 anti- federalist had hardiness enough to call it up for considera- 
 tion or to speak one word of its subject." * 
 
 The legislature of Massachusetts concurred with Hancock, 
 the governor, that an immediate second federal convention 
 might endanger the union. f The legislature of Pennsylvania 
 put the question at rest by saying : " The house do not perceive 
 this constitution wanting in any of those fundamental principles 
 which are calculated to ensure the liberties of their country. 
 The happiness of America and the harmony of the union depend 
 upon suffering it to proceed undisturbed in its operation by 
 premature amendments. The house cannot, consistently with 
 their duty to the good people of this state or with their affection 
 to the citizens of the United States at large, concur with Yirginia 
 in their application to congress for a convention of the states." 
 This vote Mifflin, the governor, early in March 1789, com- 
 municated to the governor of Virginia, J and the subject was 
 heard of no more. 
 
 Congress, as early as the second of July 1788, was notified 
 that the constitution had received the approval of nine states ; 
 but they wasted two months in wrangling about the perma- 
 nent seat of the federal government, and at last could agree 
 only on New York as its resting-place. Not till the thirteenth 
 of September was the first "Wednesday of the following Janu- 
 ary appointed for the choice of electors of president in the 
 several states; and the first Wednesday in March, which in 
 that year was the fourth, for commencing proceedings under 
 the constitution. The states, each for itself, appointed the 
 times and places for electing senators and representatives. 
 
 The interest of the elections centred in New York, Yir- 
 ginia, and South Carolina. In four districts out of the six 
 into which New York was divided the federalists elected their 
 
 * Trumbull to Washington, 28 October 1788. Letters to Washington, iv., 
 238. 
 
 f New York Daily Gazette of 17 February 1789. 
 ^ Pennsylvania Archives, xi., 557, 558. 
 
1788-1789. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. 467 
 
 candidates. Having in the state legislature but a bare ma- 
 jority in the senate, while their opponents outnumbered them 
 in the house, each branch made a nomination of senators ; but 
 the senate refused to go into a joint ballot. For this there 
 was the excuse that the time for a new election was close at 
 hand. But the senate further refused to meet the house for 
 the choice of electors of president, and this was an act of fac- 
 tion. 
 
 The star of Hamilton was then in the ascendant, and he 
 controlled the federalists ; but only to make his singular in- 
 capacity to conduct a party as apparent as his swiftness and 
 power of thought. He excluded the family of the Living- 
 stons from influence. To defeat Clinton's re-election as gov- 
 ernor, he stepped into the camp of his opponents, and with 
 Aaron Burr and other anti-federalists selected for their candi- 
 date Eobert Yates, who had deserted his post in the federal 
 convention, but had since avowed the opinion which was held 
 by every one in the state that the new constitution should be 
 supported. 'New York at the moment was thoroughly federal, 
 yet CHnton escaped defeat through the attachment of his own 
 county of Ulster and the insignilicance of his opponent, while 
 the federalists were left without any state organization. In 
 the new legislature both branches were federal, and, at the be- 
 hest of Hamilton, against the remonstrances of Morgan Lewis 
 and others, Rufus King, on his transfer of residence from 
 Massachusetts to J^ew York, received the unexampled wel- 
 come of an immediate election with Schuyler to the senate. 
 
 In Virginia, Madison went into the counties that were re- 
 lied on to defeat him, reasoned with the voters face to face, 
 and easily won the day. Of the ten delegates from the state, 
 seven were federalists, of whom one was from Kentucky. 
 South Carolina elected avowed anti-federalists, except Butler, 
 of the senate, who had conceded many points to bring about 
 the union, and yet very soon took the alarm that " the southern 
 interest was imperilled." * 
 
 Under the constitution the house of representatives formed 
 a quorum on the first of April 1789. The senate on the sixth 
 chose John Langdon of New Hampshire its president. The 
 * Pierce Butler to Iredell, in Life of Iredell, ii., 264, 265. 
 
468 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; ch. hi. 
 
 house of representatives was immediately summoned, and in the 
 presence of the two branches he opened and counted the votes. 
 Every one of the sixty-nine, cast by the ten states which took 
 part in the election, was for Washington. John Adams had 
 thirty-four votes ; and as no other obtained more than nine, he 
 was declared to be the vice-president. The house devolved 
 upon the senate the office of communicating the result to those 
 who had been chosen ; and proceeded to business. 
 
 "I foresee contentions," wrote Madison, "first between 
 federal and anti-federal parties, and then between northern and 
 southern parties, which give additional disagreeableness to the 
 prospect." ^ The events of the next seventy years cast their 
 shadows before. Madison revived the bill which he had pre- 
 sented to congress on the eighteenth of March 1783, for duties 
 on imports, adding to it a discriminating duty on tonnage. 
 For an immediate public revenue, Lawrence of JSTew York 
 proposed a general duty ad valorem. England herself, by re- 
 straining and even prohibiting the domestic industry of the 
 Americans so long as they remained in the condition of colonial 
 dependence, had trained them to consider the establishment of 
 home manufactures as an act of patriotic resistance to tyranny. 
 Fitzsimons of Pennsylvania disproved of a uniform ad valo- 
 rem duty on all imports. He said : " I have in contemplation 
 to encourage domestic manufactures by protecting duties." 
 Tucker of South Carolina enforced the necessity of great de- 
 liberation by calling attention to the antagonistic interests of 
 the eastern, middle, and southern states in the article of ton- 
 nage. Boudinot of ISTew Jersey wished glass to be taxed, for 
 there were already several manufactures of it in the country. 
 "We are able," said Hartley of Pennsylvania, "to furnish 
 some domestic manufactures in sufficient quantity to answer 
 the consumption of the whole union, and to work up our stock 
 of materials even for exportation. In these cases I take it to 
 be the policy of free, enlightened nations to give their manu- 
 factures that encouragement necessary to perfect them without 
 oppressing the other parts of the community." 
 
 " We must consider the general interests of the union," 
 said Madison, "as much as the local or state interest. My 
 
 * Madison, i., 450, 451. 
 
1789. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. 469 
 
 general principle is that commerce ought to be free, and labor 
 and industry left at large to find their proper object." But he 
 admitted that " the interests of the states which are ripe for 
 manufactures ought to have attention, as the power of protect- 
 ing and cherishing them has bj the present constitution been 
 taken from the states and its exercise thrown into other hands. 
 Eegulations in some of the states have produced establishments 
 which ought not to l)e allowed to perish from the alteration 
 which has taken place, while some manufactures being once 
 formed can advance toward perfection without any adventitious 
 aid. Some of the propositions may be productive of revenue 
 and some may protect our domestic manufactures, though the 
 latter subject ought not to be too confusedly blended with the 
 former." " I," said Tucker, " am opposed to high duties be- 
 cause they will introduce and establish a system of smuggling, 
 and because they tend to the oppression of citizens and states 
 to promote the benefit of other states and other classes of citi- 
 zens." * 
 
 The election to the presidency found Washington prepared 
 with a federal policy, which was the result of long meditation. 
 He was resolved to preserve freedom, never transcending the 
 powers delegated by the constitution ; even at the cost of life 
 to uphold the union, a sentiment which in him had a tinge of 
 anxiety from his thorough acquaintance with what Grayson 
 called " the southern genius of America ; " to restore the pub- 
 lic finances ; to establish in the foreign relations of the country 
 a thoroughly American system ; and to preserve neutrality in 
 the impending conflicts between nations in Europe. 
 
 Across the Atlantic Alfieri cried out to him : " Happy are 
 you, who have for the sublime and permanent basis of your 
 glory the love of country demonstrated by deeds." 
 
 On the fourteenth of April he received the official an- 
 nouncement of his recall to the public service, and was at ten 
 o'clock on the morning of the sixteenth on his way. Though 
 reluctant " in the evening of life to exchange a peaceful abode 
 for an ocean of difficulties," he bravely said : " Be the voyage 
 long or short, although I may be deserted by all men, integrity 
 and firmness shall never forsake me." 
 
 * Annals of Congress, i., 291. 
 
470 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; oh. hi. 
 
 But for liim the country could not liave achieved its inde- 
 pendence ; but for him it could not have formed its union ; 
 and but for him it could not have set the federal government 
 in successful motion. His journey to New York was one con- 
 tinued march of triumph. All the way he was met with ad- 
 dresses from the citizens of various towns, from societies, uni- 
 versities, and churches. 
 
 His neighbors of Alexandria crowded round him with the 
 strongest personal affection, saying : " Farewell, and make a 
 grateful people happy ; and may the Being who maketh and 
 unmaketh at his will, restore to us again the best of men and 
 the most beloved fellow-citizen." * 
 
 To the citizens of Baltimore, "Washington said : " I hold it 
 of little moment if the close of my life shall be embittered, 
 provided I shall have been instrumental in securing the hber- 
 ties and promoting the happiness of the American people." f 
 
 He assured the society for promoting domestic manufac- 
 tures in Delaware that " the promotion of domestic manufac- 
 tures may naturally be expected to flow from an energetic 
 government ; " and he promised to give " a decided preference 
 to the produce and fabrics of America." J 
 
 At Philadelphia, " almost overwhelmed with a sense of the 
 divine munificence," he spoke words of hope: "The most 
 gracious Being, who has hitherto watched over the interests 
 and averted the perils of the United States, will never suffer 
 so fair an inheritance to become a prey to anarchy or despot- 
 ism." * 
 
 At Trenton he was met by a party of matrons and their 
 daughters, dressed in white, strewing flowers before him, and 
 singing an ode of welcome to " the mighty chief " who had 
 rescued them from a " mercenary foe." 
 
 Embarking at Elizabeth Point in a new barge, manned by 
 pilots dressed in white, he cleaved his course swiftly across the 
 bay, between gayly decorated boats, filled with gazers who 
 cheered him with instrumental music, or broke out in songs. 
 As he touched the soil of New York he was welcomed by the 
 two houses of congress, by the governor of the state, by the 
 
 * Sparks, xii., 139, note. ^ Sparks, xii., 141. 
 
 f Sparks, xii., 140, 141. # Sparks, xii., 145. 
 
1789. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES.. 471 
 
 magistrates of tlie city, by its people ; and so attended he pro- 
 ceeded on foot to the modest mansion lately occupied by the 
 presiding officer of the confederate congress. On that day he 
 dined with Clinton ; in the evening the city was illuminated. 
 The senate, under the influence of John Adams and the per- 
 sistency of Richard Henry Lee, would have given him the title 
 of " Highness ; " but the house, supported by the true repub- 
 lican simplicity of the man whom they both wished to honor, 
 insisted on the simple words of the constitution, and prevailed. 
 
 On the thirtieth, the day appointed for the inauguration, 
 "Washington, being fifty-seven years, two months, and eight 
 days old, was ceremoniously received by the two houses in the 
 hall of the senate. Stepping out to the middle compartment 
 of a balcony, which had been raised in front of it, he found 
 before him a dense throng extending to Broad street, and fill- 
 ing Wall street to Broadway. All were hushed as Livingston, 
 the chancellor of the state, administered the oath of office ; but 
 when he cried : " Long Hve George Washington, President of 
 the United States ! " the air was rent with huzzas, which were 
 repeated as Washington bowed to the multitude. 
 
 Then returning to the senate-chamber, with an aspect grave 
 almost to sadness and a voice deep and tremulous, he addressed 
 the two houses, confessing his distrust of his own endowments 
 and his inexperience in civil administration. The magnitude 
 and difficulty of the duties to which his country had called him 
 weighed upon him so heavily that he shook as he proceeded : 
 " It would be peculiarly improper to omit, in this first official 
 act, my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who 
 presides in the councils of nations, that his benediction may 
 consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the 
 United States a government instituted by themselves. ]^o 
 people can be bound to acknowledge the invisible hand which 
 conducts the affairs of men more than the people of the 
 United States. Every step by which they have advanced to 
 the character of an independent nation seems to have been 
 distinguished by some token of providential agency. There 
 exists in the economy of nature an indissoluble union between 
 an honest and magnanimous policy and public prosperity. 
 Heaven can never smile on a nation that disregards the eternal 
 
472 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. b. v. ; oh. hi. 
 
 rules of order and right. The preservation of liberty, and the 
 destiny of the republican model of government, are justly con- 
 sidered as deeply, perhaps as finally, staked on the experiment 
 intrusted to the American people." 
 
 At the close of the ceremony the president and both 
 branches of congress were escorted to the church of St. Paul, 
 where the chaplain of the senate read prayers suited to the 
 occasion, after which they all attended the president to his 
 mansion. 
 
 "Every one without exception," so reports the French 
 minister to his government,* " appeared penetrated with ven- 
 eration for the illustrious chief of the republic. The humblest 
 was proud of the virtues of the man who was to govern him. 
 Tears of joy were seen to flow in the hall of the senate, at 
 church, and even in the streets, and no sovereign ever reigned 
 more completely in the hearts of his subjects than Washing- 
 ton in the hearts of his fellow-citizens. Nature, which had 
 given him the talent to govern, distinguished him from all others 
 by his appearance. He had at once the soul, the look, and 
 the figure of a hero. He never appeared embarrassed at hom- 
 age rendered him, and in his manners he had the advantage 
 of joining dignity to great simplicity." 
 
 To the president's inaugural speech one branch of the 
 legislature thus responded : " The senate will at all times cheer- 
 fully co-operate in every measure which may strengthen the 
 union and perpetuate the liberties of this great confederated 
 republic." 
 
 The representatives of the American people likewise ad- 
 dressed him : " With you we adore the invisible hand which 
 has led the American people through so many difiiculties ; and 
 we cherish a conscious responsibility for the destiny of repub- 
 lican liberty. We join in your fervent supplication for our 
 country ; and we add our own for the choicest blessings of 
 heaven on the most beloved of her citizens." 
 
 In the same moments of the fifth day of May 1789, when 
 these words were reported, the ground was trembling beneath 
 the arbitrary governments of Europe as Louis XYI. pro- 
 ceeded to open the states-general of France. The day of 
 
 * Moustier's report on the inauguration of the president of the United States. 
 
1789. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. 473 
 
 wrath, against which Leibnitz had warned the monarchs of 
 Europe, was beginning to break, and its judgments were to 
 be the more terrible for the long delay of its coming. The 
 great Frederick, who alone of them all had lived and toiled 
 for the good of his land, described the degeneracy and insig- 
 nificance of his fellow-rulers with cynical scorn. J^ot one of 
 them had a surmise that the only sufficient reason for the ex- 
 istence of a king lies in his usefulness to the people. !Nor did 
 they spare one another. The law of morality was never suf- 
 fered to restrain the passion for conquest. Austria preyed 
 upon Italy until Alfieri could only say, in his despair, that 
 despotic power had left him no country to serve ; nor did the 
 invader permit the thought that an Italian could have a right 
 to a country. The heir in the only line of protestant kings 
 on the continent of Europe, too blind to see that he would one 
 day be stripped of the chief part of his own share in the 
 spoils, joined with two other robbers to divide the country of 
 Kosciuszko. In Holland dynastic interests were betraying the 
 welfare of the republic. All faith was dying out ; and self, 
 in its eagerness for pleasure or advantage, sti:Qed the voice of 
 justice. The atheism of the great, who lived without God 
 in the world, concealed itself under superstitious observances 
 which were enforced by an inquisition that sought to rend be- 
 hefs from the soul, and to suppress inquiry by torments which 
 surpassed the worst cruelties that savages could invent. Even 
 in Great Britain all the branches of government were con- 
 trolled by the aristocracy, of which the more liberal party could 
 in that generation have no hope of being summoned by the 
 kmg to frame a cabinet. The land, of which every member 
 of a clan had had some share of ownership, had been for the 
 most part usurped by the nobility ; and the people were starv- 
 ing in the midst of the liberality which their own hands ex- 
 torted from nature. The monarchs, whose imbecility or ex- 
 cesses had brought the doom of death on arbitrary power, were 
 not only unfit to rule, but, while their own unlimited sovereign- 
 ty was stricken with death, they knew not how to raise up 
 statesmen to take their places. "Well-intentioned friends of 
 mankind burned with indignation, and even the wise and pru- 
 dent were incensed by the bitterest consciousness of wrong ; 
 
474 THE FEDERAL GOyERNMEKT. b. v. ; oh. m. 
 
 while the lowly classes, clouded by d^^spair, were driven some- 
 times to admit the terrible thought that religion, which is the 
 poor man's consolation and defence, might be but an instru- 
 ment of government in the hands of their oppressors. There 
 was no rehef for the nations but through revolution, and their 
 masters had poisoned the weapons which revolution must use. 
 In America a new people had risen up without king, or 
 princes, or nobles, knowing nothing of tithes and little of 
 landlords, the plough being for the most part in the hands of 
 free holders of the soil. They were more sincerely religious, 
 better educated, of serener minds, and of purer morals than 
 the men of any former republic. By calm meditation and 
 friendly councils they had prepared a constitution which, in 
 the union of freedom with strength and order, excelled every 
 one known before ; and which secured itself against violence 
 and revolution by providing a peaceful method for every 
 needed reform. In the happy morning of their existence as 
 one of the powers of the world, they had^chosen justice for 
 .their guide ; and while they proceeded on their way with a 
 well-founded confidence and joy, all the friends of mankind 
 invoked success on their unexampled endeavor to govern states 
 and territories of imperial extent as one federal republic. 
 
THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 WITH THE AMENDMENTS. 
 
 OOMPAEED WITH THE ORIGINAL IIT THE DEPAETMENT OF STATE, 
 SEPTEMBEE 17, 1872, AND FOUND TO BE OOREEOT. 
 
OOI^STITUTIOE" 
 
 OF THE 
 
 UNITED STATES OP AMERICA. 
 
 / We the People of tlie United States, in Order to form a more 
 perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, 
 provide for the common defence, promote the general Wel- 
 fare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and 
 our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for 
 the United States of America. 
 
 ARTICLE. I. 
 
 Section. 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be 
 vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of 
 a Senate and House of Representatives. 
 
 Section. 2. The House of Representatives shall be com- 
 posed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of 
 the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the 
 Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous 
 Branch of the State Legislature. 
 
 No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have 
 attained to the Age of twenty-five Years, and been sev en Ye ^s 
 a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, 
 be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen. 
 
 Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among 
 the several States which may be included within this Union, ac- 
 cording to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined 
 by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those 
 bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians 
 
478 THE OONSTITUTIOIT OF 
 
 not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enu- 
 meration shall be made within three Years after the first Meet- 
 ing of the Congress of the United States, and within every sub- 
 sequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law 
 direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one 
 for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least 
 one Representative ; and until such enumeration shall be made, 
 the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, 
 Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations 
 one, Connecticut five. New York six, New Jersey four, Pennsyl- 
 vania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten. North 
 Carolina five. South Carolina five, and Georgia three. 
 
 When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, 
 the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to 
 fill such Vacancies. 
 
 The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and 
 other Officers ; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment. 
 
 Sectioi^. 3. The Senate of the United States shall be com- 
 posed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature 
 thereof, for six Years ; and each Senator shall have one Vote. 
 
 Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of 
 the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into 
 three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall 
 be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second 
 Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class 
 at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be 
 chosen every second Year ; and if Vacancies happen by Resig- 
 nation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any 
 State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments 
 until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill 
 such Vacancies. 
 
 No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to 
 the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the 
 United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant 
 of that State for which he shall be chosen. 
 
 The Vice President of the United States shall be President of 
 the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided. 
 
 The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a Presi- 
 dent pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when 
 he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States. 
 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 479 
 
 The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeach- 
 ments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath 
 or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is 
 tried, the Chief Justice shall preside : And no Person shall be 
 convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members 
 present. 
 
 Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further 
 than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and en- 
 joy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States : 
 but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to 
 Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. 
 
 Section. 4. The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elec- 
 tions for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in 
 each State by the Legislature thereof ; but the Congress may at 
 any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to 
 the Places of chusing Senators. 
 
 The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and 
 such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless 
 they shall by Law appoint a different Day. 
 
 Section. 5. Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, 
 Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority 
 of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business Abut a smaller^ ^ 
 Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized 
 to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, 
 and under such Penalties as each House may provide. 
 
 Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, 
 punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Con- 
 currence of two thirds, expel a Member. 
 
 Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and 
 from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may 
 in their Judgment require Secrecy ; and the Yeas and Nays of 
 the Members of either House on any question shall, at the De- 
 sire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal. 
 
 Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without 
 the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor 
 to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be 
 sitting. 
 
 Section. 6. The Senators and Representatives shall receive 
 a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and 
 
480 THE CONSTITUTIOIT OF 
 
 paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in 
 all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be 
 privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session 
 of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from 
 the same ; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they 
 shall not be questioned in any other Place. 
 
 ISTo Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for 
 which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the 
 Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, 
 or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during 
 such time ; and no Person holding any Office under the United 
 States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continu- 
 ance in Office. 
 
 Sectioit. 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in 
 the House of Representatives ; but the Senate may propose or 
 concur with Amendments as on other Bills. 
 
 Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representa- 
 tives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented 
 to the President of the United States ; If he approve he shall 
 sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that 
 House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the 
 Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider 
 it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall 
 agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objec- 
 tions, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsid- 
 ered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall be- 
 come a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses 
 shall be determined by yeas and l^ays, and the Names of the 
 Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the 
 Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be 
 returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) 
 after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a 
 Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress 
 by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall 
 not be a Law. 
 
 Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence- 
 of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary 
 (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the 
 President of the United States ; and before the Same shall takci 
 Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him. 
 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 481 
 
 shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Rep- 
 resentatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed 
 in the Case of a Bill. 
 
 Sectio:n-. 8. '^he Congress shall have Power To lay and col- 
 lect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,^o pay the Debts and 
 provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the 
 United States ;Qbut all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uni- 
 form throughout the United States ; 
 
 To borrow Money on the credit of the United States ; 
 
 To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the 
 several States, and with the Indian Tribes ; 
 
 To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform 
 Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United 
 States ; 
 
 To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign 
 Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures ; 
 
 To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securi- 
 ties and current Coin of the United States ; 
 »/To establish Post Offices and post Roads ; 
 
 To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by se- 
 curing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive 
 Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries ; 
 
 To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court ; 
 
 To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the 
 high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations ; 
 
 To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and 
 make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water ; 
 
 To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money 
 to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years ; 
 
 To provide and maintain a Navy ; 
 
 To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the 
 land and naval Forces ; 
 
 To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws 
 of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions ; 
 
 To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Mili- 
 tia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in 
 the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respect- 
 ively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of 
 training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by 
 
 Congress ; 
 
 yoL. VI.-J-31 
 
4:82 THE CONSTITUTION OF 
 
 To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, 
 over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by- 
 Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, 
 become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to 
 exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent 
 of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for 
 the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock- Yards, and 
 other needful Buildings ; — And 
 
 To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for 
 carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other 
 Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the 
 United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. 
 
 SECTioi>r. 9. The Migration or Importation of such Persons 
 as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, 
 shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one 
 thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be 
 imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each 
 Person. 
 
 The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be sus- 
 pended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public 
 Safety may require it. 
 
 No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. 
 
 No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in 
 Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed 
 to be taken. 
 
 No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any 
 State. 
 
 No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Com- 
 merce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of an- 
 other : nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged 
 ^\^ to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another. 
 
 1^).. No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Conse- 
 
 quence of Appropriations made by Law ; and a regular State- 
 ment and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all pub- 
 lic Money shall be published from time to time. 
 
 No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States : 
 And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, 
 shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any pres- 
 ent. Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any 
 King, Prince, or foreign State. 
 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 483 
 
 Sectioi!^. 10. ' 'No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, 
 or Confederation ; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal ; coin 
 Money ;' emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and 
 silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts ; pass any Bill of 
 Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation 
 of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. 
 
 No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any 
 Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be 
 absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws : and the 
 net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Im- 
 ports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the 
 United States ; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Re- 
 vision and Controul of the Congress. 
 
 No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any 
 Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, ox* Ships of War in time of 
 Peace, enter into any Agreeriient or Compact with another State, 
 or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually in- 
 vaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. 
 
 ARTICLE. IL 
 
 Section. 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a 
 President of the United States of America. He shall hold his 
 Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the 
 Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as fol- 
 lows 
 
 Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature 
 thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole 
 Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may 
 be entitled in the Congress : but no Senator or Representative, 
 or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United 
 States, shall be appointed an Elector. 
 
 The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote 
 by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an 
 Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall 
 make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of 
 Votes for each ; which List they shall sign and certify, and 
 transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United 
 States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President 
 of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of 
 Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall 
 then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of 
 
/ 
 
 484: THE CON^STITUTIOiT OF 
 
 Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of 
 the Avhole Number of Electors appointed ; and if there be more 
 than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of 
 Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately 
 chuse by Ballot one of them for President ; and if no Person 
 have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said 
 House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing 
 the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Repre- 
 sentation from each State having one Vote ; A quorum for this 
 Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds 
 of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary 
 to a Choice, nln every Case, after the Choice of the President, 
 the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors 
 shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or 
 more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them 
 by Ballot the Vice President. 
 
 The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Elec- 
 tors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes ; which 
 Day shall be the same throughout the United States. 
 
 No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the 
 United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, 
 shall be eligible to the Office of President ; neither shall any 
 Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to 
 the '^'^^e of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resi- 
 uint within the United States. 
 
 In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of 
 his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and 
 Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice 
 President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case 
 of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the Presi- 
 dent and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as 
 President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Dis- 
 ability be removed, or a President shall be elected. 
 
 The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, 
 a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor dimin- 
 ished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, 
 and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolu- 
 ment from the United States, or any of them. 
 
 Before he enter on the Execution oi his Office, he shall take 
 the following Oath or Affirmation : — " I do solemnly swear (or 
 affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of 
 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 485 
 
 the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, 
 protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." 
 
 Sectioit. 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of 
 the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of 
 the several States, when called into the actual Service of the 
 United States ; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the 
 principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any 
 Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he 
 shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences 
 against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. 
 
 He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent 
 of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Sen- 
 ators present concur ; and he shall nominate, and by and with 
 the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassa- 
 dors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme 
 Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Ap- 
 pointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which 
 shall be established by Law : but the Congress may by Law vest 
 the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, 
 in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of 
 Departments. 
 
 The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that 
 may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Com- 
 missions which shall expire at the End of their next Session. 
 
 C ( Section. 3. He shall from time to time giVe to the Congress 
 Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their 
 Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and ex- 
 pedient ;1 he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both 
 Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between 
 them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may ad- 
 journ them to such Time as he shall think proper ;lhe shall re- 
 ceive Ambassadors and other public Ministers ; he shall take 
 Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission 
 all the Officers of the United States. 
 
 Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil 
 Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on 
 Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other 
 high Crimes and Misdemeanors. 
 
 C 
 
486 THE CO:^STITUTION OF 
 
 ARTICLE III. 
 
 Section". 1. The judicial Power of tlie United States, shall 
 be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as 
 the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The 
 Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their 
 Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, re- 
 ceive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be 
 diminished during their Continuance in Office. 
 
 Sectioist. 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in 
 Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of 
 the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, 
 under their Authority ; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, 
 other public Ministers and Consuls ; — to all Cases of admiralty 
 and maritime Jurisdiction ; — to Controversies to which the 
 United States shall be a Party ; — to Controversies between two 
 or more States ; — between a State and Citizens of another State ; 
 — between Citizens of different States, — between Citizens of the 
 same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and 
 between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citi- 
 zens or Subjects. 
 
 In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers 
 and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the 
 supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the 
 other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have 
 appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such 
 Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall 
 make. 
 
 The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, 
 shall be by Jury ; and such Trial shall be held in the State 
 where the said Crimes shall have been committed ; but when not 
 committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or 
 Places as the Congress may by Law have directed. 
 
 Section. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist 
 only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Ene- 
 mies, giving them Aid and Comfort. !N'o Person shall be con- 
 victed of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to 
 the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. 
 
 The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of 
 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 487 
 
 Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of 
 Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person at- 
 tainted. 
 
 ARTICLE. lY. 
 Section". 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each 
 State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of 
 every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws pre- 
 scribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings 
 shall be proved, and the Effect thereof. 
 
 Section. 2. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to 
 all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. 
 
 A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or 
 other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in an- 
 other State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the 
 State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the 
 State having. Jurisdiction of the Crime. 
 
 No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the 
 Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of 
 any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service 
 or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to 
 whom such Service or Labour may be due. 
 
 Section-. 3. New States may be admitted by the Congress 
 into this Union ; but no new State shall be formed or erected 
 within the Jurisdiction of any other State ; nor any State be 
 formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, 
 without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned 
 as well as of the Congress. 
 
 The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all 
 needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other 
 Property belonging to the United States ; and nothing in this 
 Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of 
 the United States, or of any particular State. 
 
 Sectioi:^. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every 
 State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and 
 shall protect each of them against Invasion ; and on Application 
 of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature 
 cannot be convened) against domestic Violence. 
 
488 THE CONSTITUTION OF 
 
 ARTICLE. V. 
 
 The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall 
 deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitu- 
 tion, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of 
 the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amend- 
 ments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and 
 Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legis- 
 latures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions 
 in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratifi- 
 cation may be proposed by the Congress ; Provided that no 
 Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand 
 eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and 
 fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article ; and 
 that BO State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal 
 Suffrage in the Senate. 
 
 ARTICLE. VL 
 
 All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before 
 the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the 
 United States under this Constitution, as under the Confedera- 
 tion. 
 
 This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which 
 shall be made in Pursuance thereof ; and all Treaties made, or 
 which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, 
 shall be the supreme Law of the Land ; and the Judges in every 
 State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or 
 Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. 
 
 The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the 
 Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and 
 judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several 
 States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this 
 Constitution ; but no religious Test shall ever be required as 
 a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United 
 States. 
 
 ARTICLE. VIL 
 
 The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be 
 sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the 
 States so ratifying the Same. 
 
 Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States 
 present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of 
 
THE UOTTED STATES OF AMEPwIOA. 
 
 489 
 
 New Hampshire 
 
 Massachusetts. 
 
 our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven 
 and of the Independence of the United States of America 
 the Twelfth In Witness whereof We have hereunto 
 subscribed our Names, 
 
 G^: WASHINGTOlSr— 
 JPresidt. and deputy from Virginia 
 ( John Langdon ) 
 ( Nicholas Gilman ) 
 j Nathaniel Gorham 
 ( RuFus King 
 j Wm. Saml. Johnson 
 ( RoGEK Sherman 
 
 New York Alexander Hamilton 
 
 WiL : Livingston 
 David Brearley. 
 Wm. Paterson. 
 JoNA : Dayton 
 
 B Franklin 
 Thomas Mifflin 
 RoBT. Morris. 
 Geo. Clymer 
 Thos. Fitzsimons 
 Jared Ingersoll 
 James Wilson 
 Gouv Morris 
 
 Connecticut. 
 
 New Jersey . 
 
 Fensylvania 
 
 Delaware. 
 
 Maryland 
 
 Virginia 
 
 North Carolina, 
 
 '' Geo : Read 
 Gunning Bedford Jun 
 John Dickinson 
 Richard Bassett 
 Jaco : Broom 
 
 James McHenry 
 
 Dan of St Thos. Jenifer 
 
 Danl. Carroll 
 
 j John Blair — 
 
 ( James Madison Jr. 
 
 r 
 
 Wm. Blount 
 
 RiCHD. DoBBS Spaight 
 
 Hu Williamson 
 
490 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION. 
 
 South Carolina, 
 
 Georgia. 
 Attest 
 
 j. rutledge 
 
 Charles Coteswoeth Pinckney 
 
 Chaeles Pinckney 
 
 PlEECE BUTLEE. 
 
 William Few 
 Abe Baldwii^ 
 
 WILLIAM JACKSON Secretary 
 
 The Word, " the ", being interlined between the seventh and 
 eighth Lines of the first Page, The Word *' Thirty " being partly- 
 written on an Erazure in the fifteenth Line of the first Page, 
 The Words " is tried " being interlined between the thirty sec- 
 ond and thirty third Lines of the first Page and the Word 
 " the " being interlined between the forty third and forty fourth 
 Lines of the second Page. 
 
 [lN"oTE BY THE Depaetment OF State. — The foregoing ex- 
 planation in the original instrument is placed on the left of the 
 paragraph beginning with the words, "Done in Convention," 
 and therefore precedes the signatures. The interlined and re- 
 written words, mentioned in it, are in this edition printed in 
 their proper places in the text.] 
 
AETIGLES 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 PROPOSED BY CONGRESS, 
 
 AND EATIFIED BY THE LEGISLATURES OF THE SEVERAL STATES, PURSTJANT 
 TO THE EIPTH ARTICLE OE THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION. 
 
 [ARTICLE I] 
 
 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of 
 religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ; or abridging 
 the freedom of speech, or of the press ; or the right of the people 
 peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a re- 
 di'ess of grievances. 
 
 [ARTICLE IL] 
 
 A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a 
 free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall 
 not be infringed. 
 
 [ARTICLE III.] 
 
 No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, 
 without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a 
 manner to be prescribed by law. 
 
 [ARTICLE IV.] 
 
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, 
 papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, 
 shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon prob- 
 able cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly 
 describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to 
 be seized. 
 
492 . THE CONSTITUTION OF 
 
 [ARTICLE v.] 
 
 "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise 
 infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand 
 Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the 
 Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger ; 
 nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice 
 put in jeopardy of life or limb ; nor shall be compelled in any 
 Criminal Case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived 
 of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ; nor 
 shall private property be taken for public use, without just com- 
 pensation. 
 
 [ARTICLE YL] 
 
 In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right 
 to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State 
 and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which 
 district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be 
 informed of the nature and cause of the accusation ; to be con- 
 fronted with the witnesses against him ; to have compulsory 
 process for obtaining Witnesses in his favor, and to have the 
 Assistance of Counsel for his defence. 
 
 [ARTICLE VIL] 
 
 In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall 
 exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be pre- 
 served, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-exam- 
 ined in any Court of the United States, than according to the 
 rules of the common law. 
 
 [ARTICLE VIIL] 
 
 Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines im- 
 posed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. 
 
 [ARTICLE IX.] 
 
 The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall 
 not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the 
 people. 
 
 [ARTICLE X.] 
 
 The powers not delegated to the United States by the Con- 
 stitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the 
 States respectively, or to the people. 
 
 / 
 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 493 
 
 [ARTICLE XI.] 
 
 The Judicial power of the United States shall not be con- 
 strued to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or 
 prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of an- 
 other State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. 
 
 [ARTICLE XII.] 
 
 The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote 
 by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at 
 least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with them- 
 selves ; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as 
 President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Yice- 
 President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted 
 for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, 
 and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign 
 and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of 
 the United States, directed to the President of the Senate ; — The 
 President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and 
 House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes 
 shall then be counted ; — The person having the greatest number 
 of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be 
 a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed ; and if 
 no person have such majority, then from the persons having the 
 highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted 
 for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose im- 
 mediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the Presi- 
 dent, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from 
 each state having one vote ; a quorum for this purpose shall con- 
 sist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and 
 a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And 
 if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President 
 whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before 
 the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President 
 shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other con- 
 stitutional disability of the President. The person having the 
 greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice- 
 President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of 
 Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from 
 the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the 
 Vice-President ; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two- 
 
494: THE CONSTITUTION OF 
 
 thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the 
 whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person 
 constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligi- 
 ble to that of Vice-President of the United States. 
 
 ARTICLE XIII. 
 
 Sectioj^" 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, ex- 
 cept as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have 
 been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any 
 place subject to their jurisdiction. 
 
 Section- 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
 by appropriate legislation. 
 
 ARTICLE XIV. 
 
 Section- 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United 
 States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the 
 United States and of the State wherein they reside. 'No State 
 shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges 
 or immunities of citizens of the United States ; nor shall any 
 State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without 
 due process of law ; nor deny to any person within its jurisdic- 
 tion the equal protection of the laws. 
 
 Section- 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the 
 several States according to their respective numbers, counting 
 the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians 
 not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the 
 choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United 
 States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial 
 officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is 
 denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twen- 
 ty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any 
 way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other 
 crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the 
 proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to 
 the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in 
 such State. 
 
 Section- 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative 
 
 Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold 
 
 Q 3e, civil or military, under the United States, or under 
 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 495 
 
 any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of 
 Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member 
 of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of 
 any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, 
 shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, 
 or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress 
 may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such dis- 
 ability. 
 
 Sectioit 4. The validity of the public debt of the United 
 States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment 
 of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection 
 or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United 
 States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation 
 incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United 
 States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave ; 
 but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal 
 and void. 
 
 Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by 
 appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. 
 
 ARTICLE XY. 
 
 Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to 
 vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by 
 any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of 
 servitude. 
 
 Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this 
 article by appropriate legislation. 
 
( 
 
 J 
 
 I. 
 
 A 1 9 
 

 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 Los Angeles 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 
 
 
 V U 
 
 mtlf 
 
 ■^OK^mw^ 
 
 ^lOSANCElfjV 
 
 Hih 
 
 %a3MNIl-3ttV^ 
 
 
 WKo m 
 
 w 
 
 ^VlOS^ANCElfj-^ f tB 2 * 
 
 REC'D LO-lM 
 
 .« ., iliKJAN 03 1995 
 ^//mmwv^ DEC 13 1994 
 
 ^^t LIBRARY^/ i W( MAR 1 •* EW5 
 
 ^mnvj-jo"^ 
 
 ^OFCAIIFO/?^ 
 
 ^^Ayviian# 
 
 ^J^il30NYS01'<^ 
 
 ''^Ail3AINa-3V\V'' 
 
 315 
 
 ^<?AavaaiH\N^ 
 
 . ^ 
 
 15 
 
 vr. 
 
 ^>:lOSANCELfj> 
 
 ^lOSANCElfj> 
 
 
 '^(f/OdllVJJO'^ ^OdllVJJO^ 
 
 ^OFCALIF0% ^OFCALIFO%. 
 
 K^ti i\f=)il^e 
 
 AV^FUNIVERS-Z/i 
 
 o 
 
 
ll)^ 3 
 
 i^ 
 
 
 
 m^^ 
 
 %mwm'^ ■^/ja]MN(imv' 
 
 1158 00560 0159 
 
 
 ^'^Ayvaan-i^'^ 
 
 5^lLIBRARYQ/: 
 
 
 ,\WEUNIVER% 
 
 ^lOSANCElfjv. 
 
 ^<!/ojnv3jo>^ '%ojnvojo^ <rii30NVsoi^ 
 
 ■< 
 %a3AINa-3WV^ 
 
 ^OfCALIFO/?,!^ ^OFCAIIFO/?^ 
 
 
 ,^MEUNIVER% 
 
 
 ^lOSANCElfj^ 
 
 "^AaaAiNa-awv 
 
 .^\^EUNIVER% 
 
 _ o 
 
 ^lOSANCELfjj> 
 
 -i^^ltlBRARYQ^^ 
 
 ^IIIBRARYQ^;^ 
 
 "^/^a^AiNn-awv^ ^<!/ojnv3jo^ "^^ojiwjjo-^ 
 
 ^WEllNIVERy//, 
 
 ^lOSANCElfx^ 
 
 <rii]DNVsoi^ "^a^AiNnawv 
 
 ^OFCAIIFO^ 
 
 ^OFCAIIF0% 
 
 ^t^AHVaaiH^ 
 
 ^:^t•LIBRARYQ/: a^UIBRARY^^"^ 
 
 XWEUNIVERi"/^ ^lftSANGElfj> 
 
 %0J nV3- J0>^ '^TO nV3- JO^ <rii33NYS01^^ 
 
 39 
 
 ?<^ -I 
 
 '^/5a]AiNn]Wv 
 
 ^.OFCALIFO%. 
 
 ^OFCALIFO% 
 
 4^: 
 
 ^WEUNIVER5•/A 
 
 ^lOSANCflfj>