BX 5133 T3790 THOMPSON OLD THINGS AND NEW A = A! o! 0! Oi 9 7 9 2 4 6 THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES OLD THINGS AND NEW.' A SEEMON, PREACHED IN THE CHAPEL OF TRINITY COLLEGE, ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1862, 23emg CTommemoration Bag. BY W. H. THOMPSON, M.A., I'ELLOW AND 'i'UTOB. CAMBRIDGE : JOHN DEIGHTON. LONDON: JOHN W. PARKER AND SON. M.DCCC.LIII. (IDambritrcjc: i^ttntcl> at t|)c 2anibcv0{tg ^vegg. TO THE MASTER, FELLOWS, AND SCHOLARS or TRINITY COLLEGE, THIS DISCOURSE IS, WITH RESPECT AND AFFECTION, INSCRIBED BY THE PREACHER. Page 16. In note, for Muir rmd Mure A SERMON, St MATTHEW XIII. 52. Every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bring eth forth out of his treasure things new and old. r\F the memorable sayings of our Lord, recorded by ^-^ his biographers, not a few seem fairly to admit of a twofold use ; as they are viewed in direct relation to the circumstances which the context supplies ; or as treated with reference to the more general applications of which in themselves, and apart from the connexion, they are susceptible. The verse before us seems one in which are to be traced both this more restricted and this wider meaning. Occurring after a series of parables, all of which are designed, under varying images, to shadow forth the nature and principles of that king- dom of heaven which it was the aim of Christ's teaching to proclaim and describe, and of his life and death actually to establish among men, — occurring in such a context, it may be not unnaturally regarded as a re- commendation of his own practice of conveying old truths under new and striking forms, and new truths under the guise of the most familiar incidents of human life. The old and the new thus mutually set off and illustrate each other : and it is surely true that the teacher who is able so to combine both, as to detain the attention and enlighten the gradually prepared faculties of his hearers, is one " schooled " in no in- considerable degree "unto the kingdom of heaven." It does not, however, appear that the followers of our Lord ventured in this respect to tread in their Master's footsteps : at least we are in possession of no recorded specimen of this teaching in parables, as prac- tised by any of his disciples. But if this most cha- racteristic feature in Christ's method of presenting di- vine truths to his hearers, is not discernible in the oral or written discourses of the Apostolic age, it would be wrong to suppose that the true spirit of the recom- mendation in our text was misunderstood or neglected by the great teachers who represent that era in the history of the Church. The remarkable declaration of their Master, " Think not that I am come to destroy the law and the pro- phets; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil," had struck deep root in their convictions, and bore its fruit in their practice, as ministers and expounders of the new dispensation. Of the Apostles of the circumcision the truth of this remark is evident at first glance. How tenderly do we find them dealing with the pre- judices of their Hebrew countrymen ; how loth to re- linquish the forms and ritual precepts of the law ; how gladly appealing to the inspiration of the prophets ; how solicitous, on all occasions, that no irreverence, real or apparent, for the old, should mingle with their proclamation of the new. And even under the mass of sensual corruption, and effete yet poisonous super- stitions, with which the face of Roman heathendom was encrusted, the earnest eye of the Apostle of the Gentiles could discern the stirrings of a not yet ex- hausted life, and the embers of truth not yet extin- guished. " Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you," and, " as certain also of your own poets have said ; For we are his offspring — " the argu- ments Paul used on Mars' hill, in contending with the subtle dialecticians of Athens, find their echo in that brief but pregnant summary of the religious history of mankind, which forms the preface to his Epistle to the mixed Jewish and Gentile Church of Rome. In which, though cheerfully acknowledging the advantage enjoyed by the Hebrew in the possession of a definite moral code, preserved in written documents, he yet loudly proclaims the authority of the law of conscience, unwritten save on the fleshly tables of the heart, which was not less binding on the heathen, confirmed as it was by the mute revelation of God's eternal power and divinity which He had given them in the- things that were made. It was, indeed, this truly catholic recognition of these deepest and most universal principles of our common human nature, which enabled St Paul to per- ceive that the divine message with which he was entrusted was not a message to the descendants of Abraham only, but to all who were made in the like- ness of God, and partakers of that light which lighteth every man that cometh into the world : but for which recognition, struggled against both long and fiercely by his brethren of narrower views, Christianity would have been, what to the heathen it appeared, but one — albeit the purest and most profound — of the numerous sects of Judaism. It was thus by his strong apprehension of the most ancient facts of humanity, that St Paul was enabled to introduce the greatest of all innovations in existing human creeds: to establish a religion positive yet no longer national ; historical and yet spiritual ; intelligi- ble to the vulgar, yet claiming the assent and obedience of the philosopher. A religion, abrogating sacrifices for ever, while it recognised the ideas, true in the main, on which sacrifice had been founded; proclaim- ing the fact of an incarnation, while it swept away worships to which the idea of incarnated Divinity had given their life and meaning ; raising the standard and strengthening the sanctions of the moral law, while it declared that by obedience to that law, should no flesh be justified before God. A religion which elevated while it abased ; which asserted, in one breath, the responsibility and the helplessness of man, the inde- feasible freedom of his will, and the necessity of abso- lute submission to the will of God. Paradoxes these, more startling than those of the Stoics, yet capable of being reconciled and verified in the experience of the most illiterate believer. And if Christianity, as first promulgated, presents this spectacle of blended old and new elements, recog- nising on the one hand all the aspirations of humanity, and yet satisfying them by methods which unaided hu- manity could not have ventured to anticipate ; not less clearly may we mark the working of those elements in subsequent phases of its history. There are those, indeed, who would have us behold in that history nothing but a continuous process of self-development, assuring us that the Romanism of the nineteenth century contains nothing but what existed implicitly in the Christianity of the Apostles, even as the oak is but the expansion and fulfilment of the type imprisoned in the acorn. It is impossible not to admire the diligence with 9 which the accomplished English expounder of this doc- trine has ransacked nature and history for analogies to recommend it, and difficult, perhaps, altogether to resist the allurements of a theory which undertakes to solve so many difficulties and to explain so many phenomena. But were it even true that the vast pretensions of the Essay on Development had been made good, were there no instances, as there are many, of" unwarrantable in- * These may seem grave charges, but compare Essay, p. 50, where an important passage of Butler is made to justify *' the doctrine of the beatification of the saints being developed into their Cultus ; of the QeoTOKo^^ or Mother of God, into hyperdulia ; and of the Real Presence into Adoration of the Host." Butler's argument is, that the relations in which the second and third persons of the Trinity stand to us being clearly laid down in Scripture, the worship of the Son and Holy Ghost is implicitly commanded ; " for, the relations being known, the obliga- tions to such internal worship are obligations of reason, arising out of those relations themselves." It is therefore tacitly assumed by Mr New- man that the relations to us of the saints and of " St Mary" are known from Scripture, as those of the Son and Holy Ghost are known. In p. 145, a quotation from Paley's Evidences is " expanded" into an apology (indirectly insinuated, but not the less real) for purgatory, the pope, monachism, persecution, and many things besides. This astounding passage in the Essay is well worth study. I will quote another : " Revelation consists in the manifestation of the invisible Divine power, or in the substitution of the voice of a Lawgiver for the voice of conscience." Ih. p. 124. No statement can be more undeniable than the former ; few more objectionable than the latter ; yet it is tacitly assumed that they are identical, and a most mischievous use is made of the assumption in the sequel. In the very next sentence, religion is used twice, and, it seems to me, in a different sense each time. '' The supre- macy of conscience is the essence of natural religion ; the supremacy of apostle, or pope, or church, or bishop, is the essence of revealed." If rdigion be taken subjectively (to use Mr Newman's own phraseology), the supremacy of conscience is as much the essence of revealed as of natural religion; if objectively, the supremacy of conscience is its essence in neither case ; — the conscience needing both a rule and a sanc- tion external to itself in either instance. These passages are taken almost at random from Mr Newman's book. The misuse of the argu- ment from analogy, and of Bishop Butler's principles, which is remark- 1—5 10 ferences slipt in by way of corollary to undeniable truths, of new meanings put on words by stealth, of propositions insinuated, which to state clearly were to refute; were the connexion between premisses and con- clusion interrupted by no such breaches of continuity, we should still be entitled to ask, What is the hypothesis that gives cogency to the argument, and is it, not suffi- cient only, but true ? If this test, by whose agency so many brilliant fabrics of human speculation have been dissolved, be applied to the Essay of which we are speaking, we shall perceive that the cohesion of its parts depends on a first falsehood* the assumption of an infallible developing authority. The enquirer to whom the existence of this virtual petitio princijni has once been made clear, will find that the spell which seemed to bind his understanding is at length broken, and that he is once more at liberty to contemplate the history of able in the Essay, reminds one forcibly of Socrates' warning : e'yw li Toi'i Sict Tc3i/ eiKOTtoi/ Ttiv aiTodei^iv iroiovjxevoL