sy^ ■^ THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES ^ /'trfi/l^ ^ Ji'fl'tt' THE O R K S c f' In LATIN and ENGLISH. The .^ N E I D TranOated By the Rev. Mr. CHRISTOPHER PITT; The Eclogues and Georgics, with Notes on the Whole, By the Rev. Mr. JOSEPH WARTON. With feveral New Observations, By Mr. HoLDswoRTH, Mr. Spence, C. Heyne, and Others. ALSO, A Dissertation on the Sixth Book of the ^neid. By Mr. WARBURTON. On the Shield of ^En-eas, by Mr. W. Whitehead. On the CharacSler of Iapis,' By the late Dr. ATTEREURY, Bifhop of Rochester. AND, Three Essays on Paftoral, Didactic, and Epic Poetry, By Mr. J O S E P H WARTON. IN FOUR VOLUMES. The THIRD EDITION, with confiderable Improvements. V O L. I. •— — ' ■ - ■ ■ I ,.. — ^* LONDON: Printed for J. D o d s l e y, in Pali-Mall. M.DCC.LXXVllI. 6b Oi r i 1 ^^ TO THE HONOURABLE Sir GEORGE LYTTELTON, Bart. ONEOFTHE Lords commissioners of the treasury. SIR, CENSURE is fo feldom foftened by apologies, tHat perhaps it may be ufelefs for me to de- clare my confcioufnefs of inability to do juftice to the moll perfed of poets, in the following tranf- lation. When I firll entered upon this work, I fometimes imagined, that I heard the voice of Virgil addreffing me with the humanity of his hero ; ^uo moriture ruts ? majoraque virihus audes P Fall'it te incautum pietas tua ! ■ for Indeed nothing but my affedlion.for the author could have engaged me in fo arduous an under- taking. Whoever confiders the degree of delicacy and corre6bnefs to which the Eclogues of Virp-il are polifhedj together with the eafe and wonderful harmony of his numbers; will be convinced of the extreme difficulty of transfufing into another VoL' I, b tongue. ii I^REFATORY DEDICATfOIir. tongue, beauties of fo refined and fubde a nature^ It requires no fmall connmand of language, to be able to carry on Pafloral Dialogues, without fink- ing into vulgar idioms, to unite fimplicity with* grace, and to preferve familiarity wichout flatnefs. A ftyle too highly elevated would be naufeoudy unnatural, and one too profaic and plebeian, would' be infipid and unaffefting. And to keep a juft mean, is perhaps as difficult in. writing as in. life. There are few images' and fentiments in the- Eclogues of Virgil, but what are drawn from the Wylliums of Theocritus : in whom there is a rural,, romantic wildnefs of thought, heightened by the Doric dialed;, with fuch lively pidures of the pafTions, and of fimple unadorned nature, as are infinitely pleafingto fuch lovers and judges of true poetry as yourfclf. Theocritus is indeed the great ftore-houfe of pafloral defcription; and every fuc- ceeding painter of rural beauty (except Thomson in his Seafons,) hath copied his images from him, without ever looking abroad upon the face of na- ture themfelves. And thus a fet of hereditary obje<5ls has been continued from one poet to an- other, which have been often made ufe of without any propriety either as to age or climate» But Virgil never borrowed an idea from h\» •Sicilian mailer, without beautifying and heighten- ing it with the luftre of his language. And per- haps» I.-W Prefatory DEDICATIO^^. ill haps it may be obferved in general, that If the llomans ever excelled their Grecian mailers in the graces of diclion, which however was feldom the Gafe, it was owing to their exerting all their powers, in drefTing up thofe thoughts and ideas that were ready found to their hands. The mind can attend but to one object at once, with any vigour and intenfenefs : and if it be big and di- lated with the conception and creation of new images, has fcarce leifure to adorn them with that pomp of fludied exprefTion, which the writer that coolly copies them, can beflow upon them. Indeed of all authors, either ancient or modern, Virgil feemeth to be the mofl: perfed in his ftyle ? 1 mean in the poems he lived to finifh. There is a profufion of the moft daring metaphors and moft glowing figures, there is a^majeflyand magnifi- cence of diiflion throughout the Georgics, that notwithflahding the marvellous harmony and gran- deur of the Greek verfification, is fcarcely excel- led by Homer himfelf. Our author's terms and epithets are chofen with fuch propriety, elegance and exprefTivenefs, that, as Mr. Addifon finely ob- fei-ves, We receive more flrong and lively ideas of things from his words, than we could have done from the obje6ls themfelvest and find our imagi- nations more afFefted by his defcriptions, than they would have been by the very fight of what he de- fcribes. We may juflly therefore apply to him what Ariftotle thought fo high a commendation of b % ijome^ ; iv* Prefatory Dedication. Homer: that he foimd out living words. If the arrows which arc impatient to deftroy, and the fpears that thirft to drink blood, are fo defervedly admired in the Iliad, Virgil doubtlefs merits equal praife, for giving life and feeling, love and hatred, hope and fear, wonder and ambition, to plants and to trees, and to tiie very earth itfelf : and for exalting his favourite infects, by endowing them v/ith reafon, paflions, arts, and civil government. To life Ariftotle's expreffion, Every thing in this /poem hath manner s^ and all the creation is ani- mated. But alas ! fmce this is the cafe, what muft be- come of a tranfiator of the Georgics, writing in a language not half fo lofty, fo founding, or fo elegant as the Latin, incapable of admitting many of its beil and boldefl: figures, and heavily fettered with the Gothic Ihackles of rhyme ! Is not this endeavouring to imitate a palace of porphyry with flints and bricks? A poem whofe excellence pecu- liarly gonfifts in the graces of diftion is far more difficult to be tranflated, than a work where fenti- ment, or paffion, or imagination, is chiefly dif- played. So that I fear we can receive but a faint notion of the beauty of the JGeorgics from any Englifh verfion of them. An engraving may in- deed faithfully reprefent the fubjed, but can give no idea of the colouring of one of Titian's land- fcapes. Befides, the mcanncfs of the terms of hufbandry'is Co_nccaleci and lofl in a dead language^ and Prefatory DedjCatjon, v and they convey no low or defpicable image to the mind ; but the coarfe and common words I was neceflltated to ufe in the following tranOation, viz. plough and fow^ ^joheat^ dung, affocs, horfe and cozi\ &c. will, I fear, unconquerably difgufl many a delicate reader, if he doth not make proper al- lowances for a modern compared with an ancient language j and doth not frequently recoiled, verbis ea vlncere rraznnm ^uamfit ! et angiijlls hunc addere rebus honorem. So juft is the obfervation of Boileau, that a mean or common thought expreffed in pompous diction, generally pleafes more than a new or noble fenti- ment delivered in low and vulgar language ; be-> caufe the number is greater of thofe whom cuftom has enabled to judge of v/ords, than v/hom {ludy has qualified to examine things. In fhort, the Georgics are the highefl flight of Virgil, and the mafter-pieces of his genius, excepting always the fourth book of the ^neid. Some of the tranfi- tions with which they are adorned, are the boldeft and moil daring imaginable, and hold very much of the enthufiafm of the ancient lyrics ; and I think one may venture to affirm, that this poem contains more original unborrowed beauties, and is more perfect in its kind as a Didaftic, than the iEneid as an Epic poem. Of this laft work, give me leave to fay, that I have ever obierved, perfons of elevated and fublime imaginations are more cap- tivated with the Iliad, and men of elegant and b 3 tender vi Prefatory Dedication. tender minds with the ^Eneid. He that perufes Homer, is like the traveller that furveys mount Atlas; the vaftnefs and roughnefsof its r