% cm _~\- viOSANff: ,•,,;_' K.m-o/:^ % i ^ Uj ! 3WV '^0 :.V^ 'V3J :,0FCA1IF0 .c.noDiov^,. -(Vlf ll'.IVFpr-, ^.iri^vAwrFifr ^\1F: ■nUNCEL 1"% r. r ^ 1 i c n n . ' ''■■ri)33NV'-S0\^ .V10SANCEI% ir '^ 1 1 ^OFCA1IFO)?>^ ,^W[UNlVERy>{ %aiAINIl-3WV^ ^&Aavaaii- .\!l"FI . ;.v> >JI MIMI J ^lOvANf.fl ^^^l■llBRARYftf § 1 i< — ■ ^ si ^,^^l•llBRARYa<^ ^^W[■UNIV[ "«^/Sa3AINn-3WV^ ^aojiivjjo>^ '■''.KOdllVJ-JO^' ' J|)f % iJV^''^ 'V/^a3MNil3rtV" a>' '''^aO: o "%83MNn3WV ^;^l■llBRARY(9/^ ^.JOJIIVDJO^- ^ ,^?'^iH!£% ^ "^(JAavaaiii^ ,^V\FHN1V! i>^^ '': ir ■■""'- t c niiiv rrnr "v/sajAiNn-^wv CO 5^ :^ ':;^ ^ ^/ia3AiNn-3ftv^ r vAtllBRARYGc^ ^ ^tfOJIIVJJO't^ %«iAiNnmv .^ ,.^^ '/ o>cOfCAllFO% '"^omwi.^ % A>;lOSANCElfj>. ■^/saiAiNnjwv^ AINHBV .•^ i^Jll Jr^ "z Or 1# X' % 11- 'l,.'3l|VJ-3W ■ (^^^-^^ '^ yrf^^ THE ANNOTATED BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER THE ANNOTATED Book of Common Prayer BEING AN HISTORICAL, RITUAL, AND THEOLOGICAL COMMENTARY ON THE DEVOTIONAL SYSTEM OF Cl)e Cl)urcl) of Cnglant) EDITED BY THE REV. JOHN HENRY BLUNT, D.D. AUTHOR OF " THE HISTORY OF THE REFORMATION " EDITOR OF " THE DICTIONARY OF THEOLOGY " ETC. ' S^us Saitl^ t))t Horn, ©tant je in tlje iuaga, ann itt, anti ash for t\t oln paffca, toTjcre ig t\t goon toap, ann toalfe tjcrcin, ann je Sljall finn rest for jour souls." — Jeremiah vi. i6 NKW EDITION RIVINGTONS WATERLOO PLACE, LONDON MDCCCXC stack Annex 5 TO HIS GRACE THE MOST REVEREND AND RIGHT HONOURABLE FATHER IN GOD EDWARD WHITE BY DIVINE PROVIDENCE LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY PRIMATE OF ALL ENGLAND AND METROPOLITAN REGARDED ALSO AS PATRIARCH OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND AND HER DAUGHTER CHURCHES THROUGHOUT THE WORLD THIS NEW AND ENLARGED EDITION OF Cf)C annotatctJ TBook of Common Iprayer IS BY PERMISSION lljlc0pcctfiillp tictiicatcti WITH THE SINCERE AND HUMBLE PRAYER THAT IT MAY HAVE THE DIVINE BLESSING FOR THE PROMOTION OF GODLY UNITY AND EXPEDIENT UNIFORMITY THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNION OVER WHICH HIS GRACE IS CALLED TO PRESIDE b 1^30735 PREFACE. ri 1HE present edition of the Annotated Prayer Book has been carefully revised in -L every part, many additions have been made, and the form of the page has been so altered as to bring the references conveniently together, with letters of reference carried across the page through both cokimns in regular succession. [1] The Historical Introduction has been entirely rewritten, and much additional matter has been included. This is especially the case in the account of the Revision of 1661, where the constitutional manner in which the Ecclesiastical work of revision was ratified by the Civil authorities is now much more fully illustrated from the Journals of the Houses of Lords and Commons. [2] The Notes on the Minor Festivals have also been entirely rewritten by their author, the Rev. Joseph Thomas Fowler of Durham, who has spared no pains in the endeavour to give them a critical value as trustworthy, though necessarily very condensed, accounts of the Saints commemorated on those days. [.3] The Gospels and Epistles have been printed at length, with some critical improvements which appear in the Manuscript of the Prayer Book, but which were unaccountably neglected in the Sealed Books and in subsequent editions. These improvements are more particularly referred to below. [4] The Psalms have been revised m the same manner from the Manuscript of the Prayer Book and from the Great Bible. Brief historical notices of the Psalms have also been added to the Liturgical references given in former editions. [o] The Introduction to the Ordinal has been much enlarged by the addition of Tables shewing, in as much detail as space ^^^ll allow, the course of INIinisterial descent and succession from our Lord and His Apostles to the Uving Clergy of the Church of England. The Text of the Prayer Book in former editions was that of the Sealed Books, but care has been taken m this edition to bring it into exact agreement with that of the Manuscript svibscribed by the Convocations of Canterbury and York, and viii Preface to tbc rc^jiscD annexed by Parliament to the Act of Uniformity. The Editor has made repeated applications for pemiission to collate tliis Manuscript ; and, after much correspondence, the following final reply was received by him : — " House of Lords, August 23r(l, ISSO. Sir, — I am directed by the Clerk of the Parliaments to inform you that the Parliament OflSce Committee have had under consideration your request of the 8th of June last, for permission to correct the text of the forthcoming edition of your Annotated Prayer Book with the MS. Book formerly attached to the Act of Uniformity, and that the Committee are of opinion that your application should not be acceded to. I have fiu'ther to inform you that the Report of the Committee has been agreed to by the House. I am, Sir, Your obedient Servant, ED. M. PARRATT. The Editor had, however, by the khid permission of Lord Caii-ns, been permitted to make use of the Manuscript to some extent ; and he is now able to say that the Text of the Annotated Book of Common Prayer, as printed in the following pages, faithfully represents that of the Manuscript except in respect to the conventional spelling and punctuation of the seventeenth century : and that where any important meaning depended on either spelling or punctuation they also have been faithfully reproduced. Among the corrections of the Text which have been introduced into the present edition in consequence of this examination of the Manuscript, two are especially to be noticed; namely, the accurate reproduction of the Authorized Version of 1611 in the Gospels and Epistles ; and of the "Great Bible " in the Psahns. For the Gospels and Epistles the Text of the Annotated Bible has been used, that Text being formed from a comparison of an Oxford Standard Text [minion, small 8vo, marg. ref] mtli the Cam- bridge Authorized Version edited by Dr. Scrivener. The Itahcs have been carefully inserted as they appear in the same Text ; and mterpolated words, such as " Jesus said," are distinguished from the actual Text by being printed within brackets. For the Psalms the Bible of 1539 has been used. The Italics of this (which are printed in Roman type in the original black-letter Bible) differ slightly here and there from those marked as such in the Manuscript of the Prayer Book ; but as the intention of the Revisers of 16G1 was to reproduce accurately the Psalter as it appears in "The Translation of the Great English Bible set forth and used in the time of King Henry the Eighth and Edwai-d the Sixth," it has been thought best to take Cranmer's Bible, the Authorized Version of 1539, as the standard. Since the original publication of the Annotated Prayer Book in 18G6, many works have been published which help to throw light on the ancient devotional usages of the Church of England ; and the Editor has made free use of these for the further improve- ment of this eighth edition. All these are included in the " List of Liturgical and Historical Authorities " printed at page xv, l)iit particular mention should be made here of Messrs. Procter and Wordsworth's edition of llie Sarum Breviary ; of Dr. anD enlargcD CDitton. ix Henderson's editions of the Yorh Missal, Matmal, and Pontifical, and of the Hereford Missal ; of Mr. Simmons' admirably edited Lay Folk's Mass Book ; of Mr. Chambers' Worshij) of the Church of England in the Fourteenth and Nineteenth Centuries; and of the late Mr. Scudamore's Notitia Eucharistica. During these seventeen years the Editor has also received many kind communica- tions in which criticisms have been offered, corrections made, or improvements suggested. It would be impossible to refer to these in detail, but he desires to mention particularly the names of thi'ee special contributors to the original work, Professor Bright, the Rev. J. T. Fowler, and the Rev. T. W. Perry, as having rendered invaluable assistance towards weeding out errors and making the work generally more perfect. The Litur- gical references to the Psalms were also revised with great care for a former edition by the Rev. C. F. S. Warren ; and the enlarged Table of Ecclesiastical Colours has been contributed for this edition by the Rev. Christopher Wordsworth, Rector of Glaston. To other correspondents, both m England and America, the Editor begs to offer his sincere thanks for their communications, and to add that they have aill received careful consideration, often with advantage to the work. In conclusion, the Editor desires to say, that although he and his coadjutors have felt it to be their duty to go into much detail I'especting ancient ritual, that the liistory of ritual might be the more effectually illustrated, it must not be supjoosed that the revived use of all such details is advocated in tliis work. So far as the Annotated Prayer Book may be supposed to exercise influence in any degree on a revival of ritual, the Editor's one great object has been that of assisting the Clergy and Laity of the Church of England in the estabhshment of a godly, manly, and rational system, by which He Who originally ordained and instituted ritual observances may be honoured, and by which they who ofter them may be built up in faith and reverence. October 1883. PREFACE TO FORMER EDITIONS. nnmS work is an attempt to gather into one concise view all the most important -*- information that is extant respecting the devotional system of the Church of England as founded on the Book of Common Prayer. Much research and study have been expended upon this subject during the last quarter of a century ; and the Prayer Book has been largely illustrated by the works of Sir William Palmer, Mr. Maskell, and Archdeacon Freeman. Many smaller books than these have also been published with the object of bringing into a compact form the results of wide and learned investigations : the most trustworthy and comjilete of all such books being Mr. Procter's excellent History of the Book of Common Prayer, ivith a Rationale of its Offices. But it has long seemed to the Editor of the present volume that a work of another kind was wanted, which (without superseding any pre- vious one of established merit) should exhibit more concisely and perspicuously the connection between the ancient and the modern devotional system of the Church of England by placing the two side by side, as far as the former is represented in the latter : and which should also give a general condensed illustration of our present Prayer Book from all those several points of view from which it must be regarded if it is to be properly understood and appreciated. Perhaps there is no one book, except the Holy Bible, which has been so much written about as the Prayer Book since the Reformation, and perhaps so much was never written about any one book which left so much still unsaid. The earliest class of commentators is represented by John Boys, who died Dean of Canterbury in 1619, and who had in earlier life published a Volume of Postils which were preceded by a diffuse comment on the principal parts of the Prayer Book. In these there is much ponderous learning, but a total absence of any Liturgical knowledge. Bishop Andrewes and Arch- bishop Laud began to open out the real meaning and the true bearing of our Offices, being well acquainted with the Greek Liturgies, and having some knowledge, at least, of the Breviaries and the Missals of the Church of England. L'Estrange, Sparrow, Cosin, and Elborow represent a still further advance towards a true comprehension of the Prayer Book ; Bishop Cosin especially being thoroughly familiar with the Sarum Missal, and perhaps with the Breviary and other Office-books of the old Church of England. In the latter part of the seventeenth century, Liturgical studies seem, indeed, to have been taken up by many of the Clergy, especially by the Nonjurors, and interleaved Prayer Books are preserved in the Bodleian and other libraries wliich testify to the industry that was shewn in illustrating its text, especially from the Greek Liturgies. None seem so thoroughly to have qualified themselves for the task of illustrating and interpreting the Book of Common Prayer as Fothergill, a nonjuror, whose interleaved Prayer Book in eleven large volumes, together with his unmatched collection of old English Service- preface to former (ZBDitions. xi books, is now in the Chapter Library at York.' But his notes and quotations were not digested into order : and although a work founded upon tliem would have been invalu- able in days when there was no better authority than the superficial Wheatley, they have since been superseded by the publications of Palmer and Maskell. The works of Comber, Wheatley, and Shepherd, were doubtless of great value in their way ; but it is melancholy to observe that they tended in reality to alienate the minds of their readers from all thought of Unity and Fellowship with the Church of our Fathers, and set up two idols of the imagination, a Church originated in the sixteenth century, and a Liturgy " compiled," and in the main invented, by the Reformers. There is not a single published work on the Prayer Book previous to the publication of Palmer's Origines LiturgiccB in 1832, which makes the least attempt to give a truthful view of it, so thoroughly was this shallow conceit of a newly-invented Liturgy ingrained in the minds of even our best writers. Notwithstanding, therefore, the great abundance of works on the Book of Common Prayer, there seems to be still ample room for one like the present, in which the spirit of our Offices is illustrated from their origin and history as well as from their existing form ; and in which a large body of material is placed before the reader by means whereof he may himself trace out that history, and interpret that spirit. Tlie object of the present work may be stated, then, to be that of illustrating and explaining the Devotional system of the Church of England by (1) a careful comparison of tlie Prayer Book with the original sources from which it is derived, (2) a critical examination of all the details of its history, and (3) a full consideration of the aspect in which it appears when viewed by the light of those Scriptural and primitive principles on which the Theology of the Church of England is founded. For the plan of the work, the general substance of it, and for all those portions the authorship of which is not otherwise indicated, the Editor must be held responsible. For the details of the text and notes in those parts which have been contributed by others (excepting the Marginal Refei'ences), the authors must, of course, be considered individually responsible. Circumstances have arisen which threw into the Editoi-'s hands a larger proportion of the work than he originally intended to undertake, especially in connection with the Communion and the Occasional Offices ; but he does not wish to claim any indulgence on this account, being fully assured that a commentary of the kind here offered ought to be judged solely by its merits as an authentic interpreter and guide. The Introduction to the Communion Service and the earlier portion of the Notes upon it are by the Editor. In the Offices for the Visitation and Communion of the Sick, the Editor has to acknowledge valuable assistance from a friend who does not permit his name to be used. Those Offices have been treated in a rather more homiletic method than most of the ' Marmaduke Fothergill was born at York in 1652, took j collection of ancient Service-books, which, with the rest of liis his degree at Magdalene College, Cambridge, and became j Library, he left to Skipwith parish, on condition of a room Rector of Skipwith. In 16S8 he was oH'ered the Rectory of ; being built to receive them. This not being done, the widow Lancaster, but not being able to talve the oatlis to William j applied to Chancery, and by a decree of that court the books and Mary, he could neither accept preferment nor receive ' were all handed over to York Minster. Mr. Fothergill the degree of D.D., for which he had qualified. He lived at also left .an endowment of £50 a year for a catechist at Pontefract, till driven thence by a Whig J. P., but died in Pontefract. Hia volumes shew that he was a most induB- Westminster, on Sept. 7, 1731. Mr. Fothergill made a noble trious reader. xii IPrcface to former coitions. others, in the hope that the Notes may assist in persuading both Lay and Clerical readers to desire a more pointed and systematic application of the Church's gifts in time of Sickness than that which is offered by the prayers ordinarily used. The text is, of course, that of the Sealed Books ; but some liberty has occasionally been taken with the punctuation, which, whether in the Sealed Books, or in the copies sent out by the Universities and the Queen's Printers, is in a most unsatisfactory condition. In the Psalms and Canticles, a diamond-shaped " point " has been used for the purpose of more plainly marking the musical division of verses, as distinguished from the grammatical punctuation. The spelling is also modernized throughout. In conclusion, the Editor begs to tender his grateful thanks to many friends who have assisted him with their suggestions and advice. Those thanks are also especially due to the Rev. T. W. Perry, and to the Pi.ev. W. D. Macray of the Bodleian Library, who have gone through all the proof-sheets, and have been largely instrumental in securing to the reader accuracy in respect to historical statements. The Editor is indebted to the Eev. John Bacchus Dykes, M.A., and Doctor of Music, Vicar of St. Oswald's, Durham, and late Precentor of Durham Cathedral, for the Second Section of the Ritual Introduction, on The Manner of performing Divine Service. The Third Section of the Ritual Introduction, on The Accessories of Divine Service, is by the Rev. Thomas Walter Perry, Vicar of Ardleigh, Essex, author of Lawful Church Ornaments, etc. etc. The Rev. Joseph Thomas Fowler, M.A., F.S.A., Hebrew Lecturer, and Vice- Principal of Bishop Hatfield Hall, Durham, is the writer of the Notes on the Minor HoLTDAYS of the Calendar. The Rev. William Bright, D.D., Regius Professor of Ecclesiastical History, Oxford, and author of A History of the Church from a.d. 313 to a.d. ibl, Ancient Collects, etc. etc., is the writer of the Introduction to, and Notes on, the Litany. Also of the Essay on the Scottish Liturgy in the Appendix. The Rev. Peter Goldsmith Medd, M. A., Rector of North Cerney, Gloucestershire, Canon of St. Albans, and late Fellow of University College, Oxford, co-Editor with Dr. Bright of the Latin Prayer Book, and author of Household Prayer, etc., is the principal writer of the Notes on the Communion Office from the Church Militant Prayer to the end ; and the compiler of the Appendix to that Office, Mr. Medd has also contributed the references to the hymns of the seasons. The Rev. Mackenzie E. C. Walcott, B.D., F.R.S.L., F.S.A., of Exeter College, Oxford, Precentor and Prebendary of Chichester Cathedral, and author of The English Ordinal, etc. etc., has contributed the Introduction to, and Notes on, the Ordinal. The Editor also desires to acknowledge his obligations to the valuable libraries of the Cathedrals of Durham and York ; to Bishop Cosin's Library, and the Routli Library, at Durham ; and to the Hon. and Rev. Stephen Willougliby Lawley, M.A., formerly Rector of Escrick, and Sub-Dean of Yoik, to whom the reader is indebted for some rare mediaeval illustrations of the Occasional Offices, and whose courtesy has otherwise facilitated that portion of the work. [1866-1882.] TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface ..... Preface to former Editions List of Authorities .... Chronological Table .... An Historical Introduction to the Prayer Book A Kitual Introduction to the Prayer Book — Section I. The Principles of Ceremonial Worship . Section II. The Musical Perfomiance of Divine Service Section III. The Accessories of Divine Service. By Eev. T, Title, etc., of the Sealed Prayer Books Acts of Uniformity . Preface, etc., to the Prayer Book Tables and Kules An Introduction to the Calendar The Calendar, with Comparative View Notes on the Minor Holydays. By Eev. J. T. Fowler An Introduction to Morning and Evening Prayer . Morning Prayer ..... Evening Prayer ..... Athanasian Creed ..... An Introduction to the Litany. By Rev. W. Bright The Litany, with Notes. By Eev. W. Bright Occasional Prayers and Thanksgivings An Introduction to the Collects, Epistles, and Gospels The Collects, Epistles, and Gospels . An Introduction to the Liturgy The Order for the Holy Communion, with Notes. By Rev. An Introduction to the Offices for Holy Baptism The Ministration of Publick Baptism of Infants, with Note; The Ministration of Private Baptism of Children in Houses, with Notes The Ministration of Baptism to such as are of Riper Years, with Notes An Introduction to the Catechism . The Catechism, with Notes .... An Introduction to the Confirmation Office . The Order of Confirmation, with Notes An Introduction to the Marriage Service The Form of Solemnization of Matrimony, with Notes An Introduction to the Office for the Visitation of the Sick The Order for the Visitation of the Sick, with Notes The Communion of the Sick, with Notes An Introduction to the Burial Service The Order for the Burial of the Dead, with Notes . An Appendix to the Burial Office . . . , By Rev. J. B. W. Perry Dykes, Mus. D. P. G. Medd, and the Editor Pac;k vii X XV xix 1 44 50 63 81 84 9fi 11(5 127 130 132 177 179 206 216 221 225 235 241 245 344 369 401 407 420 424 428 431 437 440 446 449 460 461 472 475 478 483 XIV Contents. An Introduction to the Churching Service The Churching of Women, with Notes The Comniination, with Notes An Introduction to the Psalter The Psalms, with Notes Forms of Prayer to be used at Sea, with Notes An Introduction to the Ordinal. By Rev. Mackenzie E. C. Walcott The Form and Manner of Making Deacons, with Notes. Ditto . The Form and Manner of Ordering of Priests, with Notes. Ditto . The Fonu of Ordaining or Consecrating of an Archbishop or Bishop, with Notes. General Appendix — I. The State Sei-vices. By Rev. W. D. Macray . II. The Scottish Prayer Book of 1637. By Eev. W. Bright III. The Irish Prayer Book. By Rev. W. D. JMacray Index and Glossary ,.....•• Ditto PAGE 486 487 490 496 501 650 655 674 683 693 703 705 709 713 ILLUSTEATIONS. A Horn Book ........ Ecclesiastical Vestments (two Plates). By G. E. Street, Esq., R.A., F.S.A. Catechism Tablets from the Bishop's Palace at Ely .... To /ace page 80 429 A LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL LITURGICAL AND HISTORICAL AUTHORITIES USED, QUOTED, OE REFERRED TO, I^ THIS WORK. The Manuscript Praj'er Book, subscribed by tlie Convocations of Canterbury and York, accepted by the Crown in Council, annexed by Parliament to the Act of Uniformity, and preserved among the Acts of Parliament as an original Record. A printed Prayer Book of 1G36, into which the alterations to be made were written for the information of the Crown, the Privy Council, and the two Houses of Parliament ; and which is preserved witli the Manuscript. A facsimile of the preceding volume, photozincographed by the Ordnance Office. A printed Prayer Book of 1619, containing alterations proposed by Bishop Cosin, most of which were adopted in 1661. [D. iii. 5, Cosiu's Library, Durham.] A printed Prayer Book, containing Sancroft's transcript of the notes in the preceding volume. [Bodl. Lib. Arch. BodL D. 28.] The Sealed Prayer Books. Masters' Reprint. 1848. /S'cc Pickering, Stephens, infra. Acta Sanctorum, 1643 — still in course of publication. Amalarius Symphosius [circ. a.d. 820-827], De Divin. Ofi'. Cologne, 1568. [Blbl. Max. Lugd. xiv. 934-1060.] Andrewes, Bishop. Note.s on Prayer Book. Misc. Works, Ang. Cath. Lib. 1854. Anglican Church Calendar. 1851. Assemanus, Jos. Codex Liturgicus Eccl. Universte. 1749-63. Baker, Sir Richard. On the Lord's Prayer. 1638. Baring-Gould, S. Lives of the Saints. 1872-77. Baruifaldus, Hier. Comment, ad Rituale Romanum. 1731. Beleth [thirteenth century]. Rationale Divin. Oil'. Lyons, 1612. Bingham, Jos. Antiquities of the Christian Church. 1710-22. Last edit. 1843-5. Blunt, J. H. Directorium Pastorale. 1864. Annotated Bible. 1878-82. History of the Reformation. 1868-82. Bona, Cardmal. De Rebus Liturg. Paris, 1676. Sala's ed., 1747-55. De Divina Psalmodia. Antwerp, 1677. Brady, J. Clavis Calendaria. 1812. Brett, Tho. Ancient Liturgies. 1720. Breviary, Mozarabic. Brev. Gothicum. 1775. Roman. [And see Quignonez, infra.] Salisbury. 1495-1541. fascc. i., ii. 1843-5. • York. 1493-1526. Bright, Will. Ancient Collects and other Prayers. 1857. Brogden, Jas. Hlustrations of the Liturgy. 1842. * BuUey, Fred. Variations of the Communion and Baptismal Offices. 1842. Burn, R. Ecclesiastical Law. Phillimore's ed., 1842. Burnet, Bishop. History of the Reformation. Pocock's ed., 1865. Vindication of English Ordinations. 1677. Calendars of State Papers. Domestic. 1547-80. 1660-2. Cardwell, Edw. Documentary Annals of the Reformed Church of England. 1839, 1844. History of Conferences on the Prayer Book. 1840. Synodalia. 1842. xvi a List of autboritics. Cardwell, Edw. Two Liturgies of Edward VI. 1838. Catalanus, J. C. Pontif. Roman., commentariis illustratiim. 1738. Chambers, J. D. Divine Worship in England in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Nineteenth Centuries. 1877. Churton, Archd. E. Life of Dean NoweU. 1809. Collier, Jer. Ecclesiastical History of Great Britain. 1708-14 and 1845-6. Comber, Thos. [On the Common Prayer.] Cosin, Bishop. Collection of Private Devotions. 1627. . Notes and Collections on the Prayer Book. Works, Vol. V. Ang. Cath. Lib. 1855. Cranmer, Archbp. Eemains, edited by Jenkyns. 1833. Daniel, H. A. Codex Liturgicus. 1847-54. Thesaurus Hymnologicus. 1855-6. Denzinger, H. Eitus Orientalium. 1863-4. Durandus [a.d. 1216]. Rationale Divin. Off. Lyons, 1612. Durantus, D. De Ritibus Eccl. Cath. 1675. Dyce, W. Book of Common Prayer with Plain Tune. 1843-4. Elborow, Thos. Exposition of the Book of Common Prayer. 1663. English Church Union lialendars. 1863-4. Fallow, T. M. The Order of Baptism illustrated. 1838. Field, J. E. Apostolic Liturgy and Epistle to the Hebrews. 1882. Fleury, CI. Ecclesiastical History. Newman's translation. 1842-4. Forbes, Bishop Alex. P. E.xplanation of the Nicene Creed. 1852. Commentary on the Litany. 1855. Freeman, Archd. Ph. Principles of Divine Service. 1863. Rites and Ritual. 1866. Gallican Liturgies, Neale and Forbes's. Burntisland, 1855-67. Gavantus, Barth. Thesaurus Sacrorum Rituum. 1762. Gelasius's Sacramentary [a.d. 492]. In Muratori's Liturgia Romana. Gerbertus, Mart. Vetus Liturgia Alemannica. 1776. Gibson, Bishop Edm. Synodus Anglicana. 1702 and 1854. Goar, J. Rituale Gracorum. 1647. Goulburn, Dean E. M. The CoUects of the Day. 1880. Grancolas, J. Commentarius historicus in Breviarium Romanum. Venice, 1734. Grand Debate between the Bishops and Presbyterian Divines for review of the Book of Common Prayer. 1661. Gregory, St. Sacramentary [a.d. 590]. Menard's ed. Greswell, Edw. Fasti Temp. Cathol. 1852. Origines Kalendarife Italicse. 1854. W. P. Commentary on the Burial Service. 1836. Gu^ranger, Prosp. Institutions Liturgiques. 1840-51. Guericke, H. G. F. Manual of the Antiquities of the Church. Morrison's translation. 1851. Hale, Archd. W. W. Precedents, 1475-1640. 1847. Hallier, Fr. de. De Sacris Ordinationibus. 1636. Hammond, C. E. Liturgies, Eastern and Western. 1878. Harvey, W. W. History and Theology of the Three Creeds. 1854. Hermannus, Archiep. Colon. Simplex.ac Pia Deliberatio. 1545. Daye's translation [edd. 1547, 1548]. Heurtley, C. A. Harmonia Symbolica ; a Collection of Creeds. 1858. Heylin, P. History of the Reformation. Ecc. Hist. Soc. 1849. Hey wood, J. •» Documents relating to the Act of Uniformity. 1862. Hickes, G. Letters between him and a Popish Priest [Lib. Ecc. Cath. Dunclm. ex dono Auctoris]. 1705. Hierurgia Anglicana. 1848. Hittorpius, M. De Divinis Officiis. Cologne, 1568. Hope, A. J. B. Worship of tlie Cluncli of England. 1875. Jacobson, Bishop. Illustrations of the History of the Prayer Book. 1874. Jcbb, J. Choral Service. 1843. Ritual Law and Custom of the Church Universal ; a Sermon. 1866. Jerome, St. Comes seu Lectiouariuiii. Paiiiclius's ed. Cologne, 1571. Kalendar of the EnglLsh Church. 1865-6. 9 list of authorities. xvii Keble, J. Eucharistical Adoration. 1857. Keeling, W. Liturgite Britannicoe. 1851. Kennett, Bishop. A Register, Ecclesiastical and Civil, from the Kestoratiou. 1728. Landon, E. H. Manual of Councils. 1846. Ecclesiastical Dictionary. 1849. Lathbury, T. History of the Convocation. 1853. Prayer Book. 1859. Lay Folks' Mass Book. Edited by T. F. Simmons for Early Eng. Text Soc. 1879. Leo, St. Sacramentary [a.d. 451]. Muratori's ed. 1748. L'Estrange, H. Alliance of Divine Offices [a.d. 1690]. Ang. Cath. Lib. 1846. Lingard, J. History and Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Church. 1845. Littledale, E. F. North-side of the Altar. 1863. On the Mixed Chalice. 1863. Liturgies, etc., of King Edward VL Parker Soc. 1844. etc., of Queen Elizabeth. Parker Soc. 1847. Mabillon, J. Museum Italicum. 1687-9. De Liturgia Gallicana. Paris, 1685. Manuale Sarisburiense. 1498. et Processionale Eboracense. Surtees Soc. ed. Edited by Dr. Henderson. 1875. Martene, E. De Antiquis Ecclesife Eitibus. Antwerp, 1763-4. Vet. Script. Collect. Vol. VI. Maskell, W. Ancient Liturgy of the Church of England. 1846. Dissertation on Holy Baptism. 1848. Monumenta Eitualia Ecc. Ang. 1846-7. Enquiry into the Doctrine of the Church of England on Absolution. 1849. Mason, F. Vindiciie Ecc. Anglic, sive de legitimo ejusdem Ministerio. 1625. ' Massingberd, F. C. Lectures on the Prayer Book. 1864. Meibomius, M. Antiquas Musicse Auctores Septem. 1652. Merbecke, J. Common Prayer Noted. 1550. Micrologus [Johannis, Episcopi, thirteenth century. MaskeU's date, 1080]. Pamelius's ed. Antwerp, 1565. [Bibl. Max. Lugd. xviii. 469.] Mirroure of our Ladye. 1530. [Cosin's copy, Cosin's Lib. Duiham, H. ii. 24.] Edited by J. H. Blunt for Early Eng. Text Soc. 1873. Missal, Salisbury. Paris, 1514. [Cosin's copy, Cosin's Lib. Durham, D. iii. 12.] Burntisland, 1861-74. York. Edited by Dr. Henderson for Surtees Soc. 1874. Hereford. Edited by Dr. Henderson. 1874. Irish. Edited by F. E. Warren. 1879. Morinus, J. De Sacris Ecclesios Ordinationibus. 1655. Muratori, L. A. Liturgia Eomana Vetus. 1748. Neale, J. M., and Littledale, R. F. Commentary on the Psalms. 1860-71. Primitive Liturgies. 1859. Neale, J. M. Essays on Liturgiology and Church Hist. 2nd ed., 1867. Introduction to the History of the Holy Eastern Church. 1850. Tetralogia Liturgica. 1849. Nichols, W. Commentary on the Book of Common Prayer. 1710. Nicolas, Sir N. H. Chronology of History. 1833. Palmer, W. Origines LiturgictS. 1832. Pamelius, J. [a.d. 1536-87]. Liturgica Latinorum. Cologne, 1571. Parker, Archbishop. Correspondence. Parker Soc. 1853. James. Introd. to History of Prayer Book Eevisions. 1877. First Prayer Book of Edward VI. compared with successive Eevisions. 1877. Perry, T. W. Historical Considerations relating to the Declaration on Kneeling. 1863. PhiUimore, R. J. Ecclesiastical Law. 1873. Pickering's Reprints of the Books of Common Prayer. 7 Vols. Pinnock, W. H. Laws and Usages of the Church and Clergy. 1855-63. Pontifical, Exeter [Lacy's]. Edited by Ralph Barnes. 1847. xviii a Hist of autfjorities. Pontifical, York [Egbert's]. Edited by W. Greenwell for Surtees Soc. 1853. York [Bainbridge's]. Edited by Dr. Henderson for Surtees Soc. 1875. Pontificals of Salisbury and Bangor. Pontificale Komanum. See Catalanus. Position of the Priest at the Altar. [By J. H. Blunt.] 1858. PouUain, V. L'Ordre des Priferes, etc. London, 1552. Prideaux, H. Validity of the Orders of the Church of England. 1688. Primers, Three, of 1535, 1539, 1545. 1848. Private Prayers of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth. Parker Soc. 1851. Procter, F. History and Rationale of the Prayer Book. 1857. 15th ed., 1880. Psalter, Anglo-Saxon and Early English. Surtees Soc. 1843-7. Translation of Sarum, with Explanatory Notes and Comments. [.J. D. Chambers.] 1852. Purchas, J. Directorium Anglicanum. 1858. 2nd ed., edited by F. G. Lee. 1865. Pusey, E. B. The Real Presence the Doctrine of the English Church. 1857. Scriptural Views of Holy Baptism. 1836. Quignonez, Cardinal. Brev. Rom. [Reformed Roman Breviary]. Lyons, 1543. [Edd. 1535-6 to 1568.] Renaudot, E. Liturg. Orient. Colleotio. 1716. Rock, D. Hierurgia. 1851. Church of our Fathers. 1849-53. Soudamore, W. E. Notitia Eucharistica. 2nd ed., 1876. The Communion of the Laity. 1855. Sparrow, Bishop. Collection of Ai-ticles, Injunctions, etc. 1671. Rationale of the Prayer Book. Stephens, A. J. Edition of Sealed Book of Common Prayer. Ecc. Hist. Soc. 1849-54. Book of Common Pr.iyer, from the Irish MS. in the Rolls Office, Dublin. Ecc. Hist. Soc. 1849-.'50. Strype, J. Memorials of Cranmer. Ecc. Hist. Soc.'« edit., 1848-54. ' Taylor, Bishop. Collection of Offices. 1658. Thomasius, J. M. Opera. 1747-69. Thomassin, L. Discipline de I'Eglise, etc. 1679-81. Thomson, Eb. Vindication of the Hymn Te Deum Laudamus. 1858. Thrupp, J. F. Introduction to the Psalms. 1860. Trombellus, J. C. Tractatus de Sacramentis. 1769-83. Tyler, J. E. Meditations from the Fathers illustrating the Prayer Book. 1849. Walafridus Strabo [a.d. 830]. De Rebus Ecc. Cologne, 1568. [Bibl. Patr. ISIax. lAigd. xv. 181.] Warren, C. The Ministry of the Word for Absolution, in answer to Maskell. 1849. The Lord's Table the Christian Altar. 1843. Wheatley, C. Rational Illustration of the Book of Common Prayer. Corrie's ed., 1858. Wilberforce, R. I. The Doctrine of the Holy Eucharist. 1853. Wilkins, D. Concilia. 1737. Williams, Isaac. The Psalms interpreted of Christ. 1864. Zaccaria, F. A. Bibliotheca Ritualis. 1776-81. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. Liturgy of Cassian and Leo ........ Sacramentary of St. Leo ........ Qelasius ........ Gregory ........ St. Augustine'.s revised Liturgy of Britain ...... Salisbmy Use of St. Osmund ........ English Prymer. [Maskell's Mon. Kit. Aug. ii.] ..... Liber Festivalis. [A book of mediaeval English Homilies, printed by Caxton.] Salisbury Breviary " reformed." [l.st ed.] ...... Mirror of our Lady. [A translation of and commentary on the Daily Offices of Syon and the Mass.] Salisbury Breviary " reformed." [2nd ed.] ...... Missal " reformed " . English Psalters printed ........ Marshall's Prymer ......... English Epistles and Gospels printed ...... Hilsey's Prymer ......... The " Great Bible " set up in Churches as the " Authorized Version " Salisbury Use further reformed, and adopted (by order of the Convocation) throughout the Province of bury .......... Committee of Convocation commissioned to revise Service-books English Litany ordered for use in Churches ...... King Henry VIII.'s Prymer ........ Archbishop Hermann's Consultation [German, 1543; Latin, 1545], printed in English, 1547 ; reprinted Edward VI.'s First Year ........ Jan. 28, 1547, Second Year ....... Jan. 28, 1548, English Order of Communion added to Latin Mass ....... Book of Common Prayer. [First Book of Edward VI.] — Submitted to Convocation (by Committee of 1542-49) .... Laid before Parliament as part of Act of Uniformity [2 and 3 Edw. VI. c. 1] Passed by the House of Lords ditto ditto Commons ditto ditto Printed ready for circulation . ....... Received Royal Assent as part of Act of Uniformity [2 and 3 Edw. VI. c. 1]. [Probably at proro| Parliament on . . . ...... Taken into general use ........ English Ordinal .......... Book of Common Prayer. [Second Book of Edward VI.] — [Committee of Convocation commissioned, probably ..... Passed through Parliament as part of Act of Uniformity [5 and 6 Edw. VI. c. 1] . Ordered to be taken into use from ....... Edward VI. died .......... Acts of Uniformity (including Prayer Books) repealed by 1 Mary, sess. ii. c. 2 . A.D. circ. 420 451 492 590 circ. 600 . 1085 circ. 1390 . 1483 . 1516 . 1530 . 1531 . 1533 1534-40 . 1535 1538-48 1539 . 1540 Canter- . 1541 1542-49 .hms 11, 1544 1545 1548 to Jan. 27, 1548 to Jan. 27, 1549 . March 8, 1548 . Nov. 24, 1548 . Dec. 9, 1548 . Jan. 15, 1549 . Jan. 21, 1549 . March 7, 1549 igation of March 14, 1549] . June 9, 1549 March 1550 . 1551] . April 6, 1552 . Nov. 1, 1552 . July 6, 1553 Oct. 1553 XX Cf)ronological Catilc. Queen Elizabeth's Accession .....■■ Edward YI.'s Second Book restored (with some alterations) by 1 Eliz. c. 2 Queen Elizabeth's Latin Book of Common Prayer .... Commission to revise Calendar and Lessons ..... Hampton Court Conference ....... Scottish Book of Common Prayer ...... Prayer Book suppressed by " ordinance " of Parliament Use of Prayer Book began to be revived ..... Savoy Conference ....•••■ of Common Prayer [that now in use] — Commission to the Convocations to revise it . Kevision completed by Convocations ..... Approved by King in Council ..... Passed House of Lords as part of Act of Uniformity [14 Car. 11. c. 4J Commons ditto ditto Received Royal Assent ditto ditto Taken into general use Adopted by Irish Convocation Standard copies certified under Great iSeal Embodied in Irish Act of Uniformity [IV and 18 Car. ii. c. Gj William the Third's Commission to review Prayer Book Revised Calendar authorized by 24 Geo. II. c. 23 American Book of Common Prayer . Revised Tables of Lessons authorized by 34 and 35 Vicl. c. 37 . Shortened Order for Morning and Evening Prayer authorized by 35 ;md 3(3 Vict. c. 35 A.D. . Nov. 17, 1558 . June 24, 1559 1560 . Jan. 22, 1561 Jan. 14-18, 1604 1637 . Jan. 3, 1645 April 1660 April 15 to July 24, 1661 June 10, 1661 Dec. 20, 1661 Feb. 24, 1662 April 9, 1662 May 8, 1662 May 19, 1662 Aug. 24, 1662 Nov. 11, 1662 Jan. 5, 1663 June 18, 1666 1C89 1752 1785-89 . 1871 . 1872 AN HISTOEICAL INTEODUCTION TO THE PRAYER BOOI V. n~^HE Book of Common Prayer romaiued altogether unaltered for more than two centuries, the new Tables of Lessons of 1871 being the first change made since it was revised, after the great persecution of the Church by the Puritans, in IGGl. But the various stages of its developement from the ancient formularies of the Church of England extended through a period of one hundred and fifty years ; and the history of that developement is of the highest importance to those who wish to under- stand and use the Prayer Book, as well as of considerable interest to all from the fact of its being an integral part of our national history. The Church of England has had distinctive torundaries of its own as I'ar back as the details of its customs in respect to Divine Worship can be traced. The earliest history of these formularies is obscure, but there is good reason to believe that they were derived, through Lyons, from the great patriarchate of Ephesus, in which St. John sj)ent the latter half of his life. There was an intimate connection between the Churches of France and England in the early ages of Christianity, of which we still have a memorial in the ancient French saints of our Calendar ; and wlien St. Augustine came to England, he found the same rites used as he had observed in France, remarking upon them that they differed in many particulars from those of Eomc. It is now a well-established opinion that this ancient Gallican Liturgy came from Ephesus.' But there can be no doubt that several waves of Christianity, perhaps of Af)ostolic Christianity, passed across our island ; and the Ephesine or Johannine element in the ancient Prayer Books of the Church of England probably represents but the strongest of those waves, and the predominating influence which mingled with itself others of a less powerful character. It was in the sixth century [A.D. 596] that the great and good St. Augustine undertook his missionary work among the West Saxons. The mission seems to have been sent from g^ j^^-ustjjjg ^^^ Rome by Gregory the Great under the impression that the inhabitants of England the old English were altogether heathen ; and if he or Augustine were not unacquainted with what ' ^^■ St. Chrysostom, St. Jerome, and others had said respecting the early evangelization of Britain, they had evidently concluded that the Church founded in Apostolic times was extinct. When Augustine arrived in England, he found that, although the West Saxons were heathen, and had di-iven the Church into the highlands of Wales by their persecution, yet seven bishops remained alive, and a large number of clergy, who had very strong views about the independence of the Church of England, and were imprepared to receive the Roman missionary except on terms of equality. The chief difficulty felt by St. Augustine arose from the difference just referred to between the religious system of Italy, the Church of which was the only one the missionary priests were at that time acquainted with, and the systems of France and England. This difficulty, a great one to a man so conscientious and simple-minded, he submitted to Gregory in the form of questions, and among them was the following one on the subject of Divine Worship : " Whereas the Faith is one, why are the customs of Churches various ? and why is one manner of celebrating the Holy Communion used in the holy Roman Church, and ^ Sec Pai,mkr"s Orirfinrs Lihirg. i. l.'il-!. NF..Ai.T:aiKl Fokbe.s' GrilHran Liturgies. Feeem.^n's Prineipks of Pii-iiie Service, ii. 399. A 9n l^lstorical JntroDuction another in that of the Gauls ? " This diversity becomes even more prominent in the words which Augustine addressed to the seven Bishops of the ancient Church of England, when they met in conference at the place afterwards called St. Augustine's Oak. "You act," said he, "in many particulars contrary to our customs, or rather, to the customs of the universal Church, and yet, if you will comply with me in these three points, viz. to keep Easter at the due time; to perform the administration of baptism, by which we are born again to God, according to the custom of the holy Roman and Apostolic Church ; and jointly with us to preach the Word of God to the English nation, we will readily tolerate all your other customs, though contrary to our own." The answer of St. Gregory contained wise and Catholic advice ; and to it we owe, under Providence, the continued use of an independent form of Divine Worship in the Church of England from that day to the present. " You, my brother," said Gregory, " are acquainted with the customs of the Roman Church in which you were brought up. But it is my pleasure that if you have found anything either in the Roman or the Galilean or any other Church which may be more acceptable to Almighty God, you carefully make choice of the same ; and sedulously teach the Church of the English, which is at present new in the Faith, whatsoever you can gather from the several Churches. For things are not to be loved for the sake of places, but places for the sake of good things. Select, thei'efore, from each Church those things that are pious, religious, and correct ; and when you have made these up into one body, instil this into the minds of the English for their Use." [Greg. O-pera, ii. 11.51, Bened. ed. ; Bede's Eccl. Hist. i. 27.] The Liturgy of the Roman Church spoken of in this reply is represented by the ancient Sacramentary of St. Gregory, to which such frequent references are given in the following pages : that of the Galilean Church is also partly extant,^ and has been shewn (as was mentioned before) to be derived from the Liturgy of the Chui-ch of Ephesus. The words " any other Church " might be supposed to refer to an independent English Liturgy, but there is no reference to any in the question to which Gregory is replying, and he evidently knew nothing of' England except through Augustine. From other writers it seems that the Liturgy of England or Britain before this time had been the same with that of France ; but the native Clergy always alleged that their distinctive customs were derived from St. John. Being thus advised by St. Gregory, the holy missionary endeavoured to deal as gently as possible with those whose customs of Divine Worship differed from his own ; but his prepossessions in favour of the Roman .system were very strong, and he used all his influence to get it universally adopted throughout the country. Uniformity in all details was not, however, attainable. The national feeling of the ancient Church steadily adhered to the ancient rite for many years ; while the feeling of the Church founded by St. Augjustine was in favour of a rite more closely in agreement with that of Rome. As collision was the first natural consequence of this state of things, so some degi'ee of amalgamation as naturally followed in course of time ; that which was local, or national, mingling with that which was foreign in the English devotional system, as it did in the English race itself Some attempts were made, as in the Council of Cloveshoo [a.d. 747], to enforce the Roman Liturgy upon all the dioceses of the country, but it is certain that the previous devotional customs of the land had an exceedingly tenacious hold upon the Clergy and the people, and that no efforts could ever wholly extirpate them." At the time of the Conquest another vigorous attempt was made to secure uniformity of Divine Service throughout the country, and with the most pious intentions. St. Osmund, Bishop of Salisbury, The ■•Use" of Balls- ^"^ Chancellor of England,'' collecting together a large body of .skilled clergy, *">rT. remodelled the Offices of the Church, and left behind him the famous Portiforium or Breviary of Sanim, containing the Daily Services; together with the Sanim Mis.sal, containing the Communion Service ; and, jjrobably, the Sarum Manual, containing the Baptismal and other " occasional " Offices. These, and some other Service-books, constituted the " Sarum Use," that is, the Prayer Book of the diocese of Salisbury. It was first adopted for that diocese in A.D. 1085, and ' Sec the n.imPH Menard, Muratori, ami M.ahillon, in t}ie List of Authorities. The (jreKorian and Gallican Liturgies arc also printed in Hammond's LitnrijicK, Eastern and Western, Oxford, 1878. ' Sco Maskeli,'3 Ancient Liturgy of the. Church of England, Preface, p. liv. ' St. ()»miind, who w.is canonized in A.n. 14.5fi, was a nejilicw of William the Conqueror, being the son of the king's sister Isabella and licury, Count of Seez. lie was the second Bishop of Salisbury [a. T>. 1078-1009] after the foundation of that diocese by the consolidation of the Sees of Kanisbury aud Sherliornt^ in A.i>. 10.")8 .and 107.'). St. O.sniund was the principal buihlor of tlic Cathedral of Old Sarum, a small lortiticd hill a few miles distant from the present city. This catlicdr.al w.as t,akcn down, and that of New Sarum, or S.alisbury, the existing cathedral, built in the place of it, in A.n. 1225: the remains of St. Osmund being removed thither. to the Pragcr H5ook was introduced into other parts of Enffluiid so generally tluit it became the principal devotional Rule of the Church of England, and continued so for more than four centuries and a half: " the Church of Salisbury," says a writer of the year 1250, " being conspicuous above all other Churches like the sun in the heavens, diffusing its light everywhere, and supplying their defects." ' Other Uses continued to hold their place in the dioceses of Lincoln, Hereford, and Bangor, and through the greater part of the Province of York ; though in the diocese of Durham the Salisbury system was followed. At St. Paul'.s Cathedral, and pcrhaj^s throughout the diocese of London, there was an independent Use until A.D. 1414. For about a hundred and fifty years before the Prayer Book era there was some displacement of the Sarum Use by Roman customs in Monasteries, Monastic Churches (though not at Durham), and perhaps in Parish Churches served by Monastic clergy : but the " Use " itself was not superseded to any gi'cat extent even in these. The Salisbury Use, that of York, and that of Hereford, are well known to modern ritualists.- They appear to be traceable to a common origin ; but they differ in so many respects from the Roman Breviary, and even from the Missal (with which a closer agreement might have been expected), that they clearly derive their common origin from a source independent of the Roman Church. And, whatever quarter they may have been derived from in the first instance, it is equally clear that the forms of Divine Service now known to us under these names represent a system which was naturalized so many ages ago, that it had been entitled to the name of an indepen- dent English rite for at least a thousand years. During all this time the public Services of the Church were said in Latin, for Latin had been auring some ages the most generally understood language in the world, and was spoken vernacularly in France, Spain, Portugal, and Italy (the modern languages of all which countries were formed irom it) do%vn to a comparatively late time, as it is now spoken in Hungary. In England the Latin language was almost as familiar to educated persons as it was upon the Continent ; but the poor and uneducated knew no other tongue than their native English, and for these the Church did the best that could be done to provide some means by which they might make an intelligent use of Divine Service. From the earliest periods we find injunctions imposed upon the Clergy that they should be careful to teach the people the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and the Ten Commandments in their own tongue. Thus, in A.D. 740 there was a canon of Egbert, Archbishop of York, to the effect, " that every priest do with great exactness instil the Lord's Prayer and Creed into the peojjle committed to him, and shew them to endeavour after the knowledge of the whole of religion, and the practice of Christianity." '' About the same time, in the Southern Province, it is ordered " that they instil the Creed into them, that they may know what to believe, and what to hope for." * Two centuries later there is a canon of .^Ifric, Ai'chbishojj of Canterbury, enjoining the clergy to " speak the sense of the Gospel to the people in English, and of the Pater noster, and the Creed, as often as he can, for the inciting of the people to know their belief, and retaining their Christianity." ^ Similar injunctions are to be found in the laws of Canute in the eleventh century, the constitutions of Archbishop Peckham in the thirteenth, and in the canons of many diocesan synods, of various dates in the mediaeval period. Many expositions of the Creed, Lord's Prayer, Ten Commandments, and other principal formulae, are also to be found in English, and these give testimony to the same anxious desire of the Church to make the most use possible of the language spoken by the poor of the day."* Interlinear translations of some, at least, of the Offices were also provided, especially of the Litany, just as the English and Welsh Prayer Book, or the Latin and English Missal of the Roman Catholics, are printed in parallel columns in modern times. But in days when books were scarce, and when few could read, little could be done towards giving to the people at large this intelligent acquaintance with the Services except by oral instruction of the kind indicated. Yet the writing-rooms of the Monasteries did what they could towards multiplying books for the purpose ; and some provision was made, even for the poorest, by means of honi-books, on which the Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and the Angelic Salutation were written. The following is an ' At an even earlier (late [xV. D. 1"200] the chronicler Brompton says that the Custom-book of Salisbury wi^s u sed almost all over England, Wales, and Ireland. [Brompton's Ckroii. 977.] - These three Knglisli Uses alone were of sufficient import- ance to ensure the dignity of appearing in print while they ^ Johnson's Eiit/. Canoiis, i. 186. * Ibid. 248. 5 Ibid. 398. " It must be remembered that English was not spoken universally by the upper classes for some centuries after the were living rites. Hereford Viarely secured that honour, while i Conquest. In 1362 an Act of Parliament was passed enjoin- Salisbury is represented by at least a hundred editions ; the ing all schoolmasters to teach their scholars to translate into Sanim Breviarv alone having been printed some forty or fifty Knglish instead of Prench. times between 1483 aud 1557. i an lt)i0tortcal Jntrotiuction engraving made from one of two which were found by the present writer under the floor of Over Church, near Cambridge, in 1857. It is of a late date, and has had " In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.'" in the place of the Angelic Salutation; but it is given as an illustration of the traditional practice, and because it is of special interest from being found in a church. r '■'^■r.: \:'.J \-l£i-ci's\- mew Uamrt lic^ \ (]C()'onfii)rarina$ Uis : bcn<5UMastlu«0ai>oQ I, -iSTOffoi-oiiif tlic;«-( While these horn-books were thus provided for the poor, the Scriptorium of the Monastery also i)r(3vided Prymers in English and Latin for those who could afford the expensive luxury of a book. The Latin Prymers are well known under the name of" Books of Hours." Vernacular Prymers exist which were written as early as the fourteenth century, and many relics of old English de\otion of that date still remain.^ These English Prymers contained about one-third of the Psalms, the Canticles, the Apostles' Creed, with a large number of the prayers, anthems, and jierhaps hynnis. 'J'hey continued to be published up to the end of Henry VIII.'s rcign,^ and, in a modified fonn, even at a later date : and they must have familiarized those who used them with a largo portion of the Services, even when they did not understand the Latin in which those Services were said by the clergy and choirs. The style of the language in which these early English Prayer Books were written varies with the a^^e, and the following specimens will show how much change our native tongue has undergone in the course of the thirteen hundred years during which we can trace it. ' A still earlier Prvincr in T..atin and "Anglo-Saxon" ia printed at the end of HirKE-s' LHlcm, etc. It probably dates from the tenth or eleventh centuriea. ' Coverdale and Or.ifton the printer wrote to Cromwell on September I'i, l.^'JS, in favour of Regnanlt, tlic r.irisi.in ])rintcr, at whose press n)any of the Brevi,-irics and Mifisals uscmI in Kngl.ind were printed. They say that, among other books, he had printed English Prymers for forty years, that is, from the end of the fifteentli centnry. [State Papers. Dom. Hen. VIII. i. 589.1 to tf)c IPrager TBook. THK LOKDS I'liAYKit IN ENGLISH CENTURY. OF THK THIRTEKNTH THK LORDS PRAYER I.V EMiLISH OK I'HK SEVENTH CENTUItY. Fader usajr tlm artli in Heofnas sic gehalgad noiua thin to cymeth ric thin, sie wiHo thin su:e is in Heofnc and in Enrtho. Hlaf viserne oferwistlic sel us to da-g, and forgef us scyltha usra sum use forgefun scylguni usum. And ne inlead usith in costnungo. Ah gefrig usich from yfle. THE CREED IN ENGLISH OF THE NINTH CENTURY. Ic gelyfe on God Fader ailmihtigne, Scyppend heo- fonan and eortlian ; And on Hwlaiid Crist, Sunu his anlicau, Drihten urne ; Se the wajs geacnod of thani Halgan Gaste, Acwnned of Jlarian tham masdene ; Gethrowad under tham Pontiscan Pilate, Gerod faistnad, Dead and hebyrged ; He nither astah to hel warum ; Tham thriddaii daige he aras fram deadum ; He astah to lieofonuni ; He sit to swythran hand God Fseder wass ielmihtigan ; Thonan toweard denian tha cucan and tha deadan. Ic gelyfe Tha lialgau gelatliunge riht gelyfdan; Halgana geniienysse ; And f orgyf nysse .synna ; Flsesces £eriste ; And thajt ece life. Si hit swa. To these early specimeus of devotional English may be added a lew taken out of a volume of considerable size, the Primer which was in common use about a hundred years before the present English Prayer Book was constructed.^ Fader cure that art in heve, i-halgced bee thi noma, i-cume thi kinereiche, y-worthe thi wylle also is in hevene so be on erthe, oure iche-dayes bred jif us to day, and forjif us oure gultes, also we forjifet oure gultare, and ne led ows nowth into foiidingge, auth ales ows of harme. So be it. THE CREED IN ENGLISH OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY. Hi true in God, Fader Hal-michttende, That makede heven and herdeth ; And in Jhesu Krist, is ane lepi Sime, Hure Laverd; That was bigotin of the Hali Gast, And born of the maindeu Marie ; Pinid under Punce Pilate, festened to the rode, Ded, and dulvun ; Licht in til helle ; The thride dai up ras fra dede to live ; Steg intil hevenne; Sitis on his Fadir richt hand, Fadir ahvaldand ; He then sal cunie to deme the quike and the dede. Hy troue hy theli Gast; And hely * * kirke ; The samninge of halges ; Forgifnes of sinnes ; Uprisigen of fleyes : And life withuten ende. Amen. Pater Nostet: OUPiE fadir, that art in heuenes, halewid be thi name : thy rewme come to thee ; be thi wille do as in lieuene and in erthe : oure eche dales breed 5yue us to day : and forsyue us oure dettis, as and we forjeuen to oure dettiiuris : and ne lede us into temptacioun : but delyuere us fm yuel. So be it. Domine, Laliia. Lord, thou schalt opyne myn lippis. And my mouth schal schewe thi prisyng. God, take heede to myn help : Lord, hije thee to helpe me. Glorie be to the fadir and to the sone and to the holy goost : As it was in the bygynnyng and now aiul ener and in to the worldis of worldis. So be it. frcdo ill. JBILEUE in god, fadir alniysti, makere of heuene and of erthe : and in iesu crist the sone of him, oure lord, oou aloone : which is conceyued of the hooli gost : born of marie maiden : suii'ride passioun undir pounce pilat: crucified, deed, and biried: he wente doun to hellis : the thridde day he roos ajen fro deede : he stei? to heuenes : he sittith on the rijt syde of god the fadir almy5ti : thenus he is to come for to deme the „„„!„ " Tt ;- ,,l..,f,.,l 1,. <„Iif„,l may fynile the lessouns, iMStlis and t'osiwls, tluit litii red 111 tlie chuiihe Rubrics and Devotions for the I eople. It is admiriibly edited 1 ^f^?^ (,,^ ,,^^ ^f sahsbiiri: marki.l with Icttris of the a. b. c. at the by the Rev. T. F. .Simmons, Canon of lork and Rector of bcK,iiiiyiigc of tlie chaiiitris toward the myddil or ccnde: aftir the oixire as Daltoii Holme. The book is a mediseval " Companion to the thelcttris stonden in the a. b. c. first ben sett sundaics and ferials togldere : Altnr •' infl w-ia written in the twelfth centurv »'"' ■''''"'' »•"■» the s.inctoriim, the proiire an.l coniyn tORider of al the yccr : Altar ana w as wrilien in tne iw tiiin ceniury. ,„„, t,,„„„p ,„st the conimemoraoiouns : that is clcpid the temporal of ' This was wntten about A.D. 14.50, anil printeil m A.I>. nl the yere. First is written a clause of the begynnyngc of the jiistlc and 1530. It was reprinted by the Early English Text Society , gosi"!, and a clause of the endynse themf " in 1S7.3, with the title, "The Myriiure of oure Ladye, con- , "Thclirst)''" taining a devotioiLil treatise on Divine Service, with a tr.aiis- lation of the Offices used by the Sisters of the lirigittine Rom. xiii. c. ti. we Kiiowpii thi.s ende. in tlio lord Ihs tviiic. Ct. Mfttthni xxi. c. ". wlinimo ilis cam endf. nsaiutn in hi^h iiy;;''' thiuK'is.- soni'ii'lay V, ..fii.ha'nt. 1 ' Monastery of Sion at Isleworth, during the tiftccuth and ' This Rrcviary, perhaps the liiiest which h.is been pre- sixteciith centuries. Edited from the black-letter text of l.'iSO, served, belonged to the Parish Church of Arlinghani in with Introduction and Notes, by .Tohn Henry Blunt," ; (Uoucestersliire, then in the Diocese of Worcester, and was etc. It is a commentary upon the Hours, or Services written in the early p.art of the fifteenth century. The for every day of the Week, and upon the Mass : the whole Aspersion Service w.is inseited at a later time, the writing of the f. 1440 to 1460. Tlieie In the library of St. .John's College, Oxford, there is also a l is a critical ji.apcr on this .Xspeision by Mr., now Biahop.Kiiig- Trocessionale fMS. IfiT] with English rubrics, which onco don, in the Willsliirt .l/r/((ifi/o;/iVii/ .l/ii;/<(:i«'' for 187SI, p.iges belonged to .Sjon, and was written in the middle of the ()2-7y the dio- to tbe iprajjcc TBoofe. While this anthem was being sung the priest, with the aqufe-bajulus, or holy water-bearer, and the choir walked in procession down the nave of the church, the former sprinkling the congregation with the water ; and it is probable that the whole of the fifty-first Psalm was sung. After this followed the Bidding Prayer in English, several Collects in Latin, and then the Sermon. But although this English Service was evidently in very general use, it does not seem as if the idea of entirely Vernacular Services spread very widely among the clergy and people of England until after the dissolution of the monasteries. Then the gradual but slow approximation to such a system received a great impetus, and Latimer found a very hearty response in the minds of the clergy when, speaking of baptism in his sermon before the Convocation of A.D. 15.3G, he exclaimed, " Shall we ever- more in ministering it speak Latin, and not English rather, that the people may know what is said and done ?" [Latimer's Servians, i. 52, ed. 1824.] The assent to this change was in fact so unanimous among the clergy that Archbishop Cranmer wrote to Queen Maiy respecting the Committee appointed for the revision of the Services by Henry VIII., that although it was composed of men who held different opinions, they " agreed without controversy (not one saying contraiy) that the Service of the Church ought to be in the mother tongue." [Jenkyns' Cranmer s Rem. i. 375.] Ridley also writes to his chaplain that he had confeiTed with many on the subject, and " never found man (so far as I do remember), neither old nor new, gospeller nor papist, of what judgment soever he was, in this thing to be of a contrary opinion." [Ridley's Worhs, p. 340.] With this general inclination of the national mind towards the use of the national language alone in Divine Service there arose also that necessity for condensed services which has previously been referred to. There are no means of deciding how far the original Use of Salisbury differed from that which is known to us. The copies remaining belong to a much later period than the eleventh century, and there is reason to think that some accretions gathered around the ancient devotions of the Church of England from the prevalence of Continental influences during the reigns of the Norman and Angevin kings, and from the great increase of monastic establishments : the .shorter and more primi- tive form of responsive public service being found insufficient, especially for those who formed them- selves into societies for the purpose of carrying on an unceasing round of pi'ayer and praise in the numerous Minsters which then covered the face of our land. But now that the " religious " of the Church were to be a separate body no longer. Divine Providence led her to feel the way gradually towards a return to the earlier practice of Christianity ; the idea of a popular and mixed congregation superseded that of a special monastic one ; and the daily worship being transferred from the Cloister to the Parish Church, its normal form of Common Prayer was revived in the place of the Prayers of a class or the solitary recitation of the Parish Priest. No blame was cast upon the former system for its complexity ; but the times were changed, a new order of things was becoming established, and, although the principles of the Church are unchangeable, so entire a remoulding of society entailed of necessity a corresponding adaptation of her devotional practice, both for the honour of God and the good of souls, to the wants that had come to light. Some slight attempts were made at a reformation of the Sarum Offices in editions of the Breviary which were printed in lolG and 1531, and a Missal of 1509 is even described as "amended." There was little variation, indeed, from the old forms ; but there was a distinct initiation of the principles which were afterwards carried out more fully in the Book of Common Prayer of 1549. The rubrics were somewhat simplified ; Holy Scripture was directed to be read in order without omission ; and in carrying out the latter direction the Lessons, which had been much shortened in actual use {see note to Table of Lessons], were restored to their ancient length. tribution of the eulogia or blessed bre.xtl. The two are orders both rites to be used every Sunday, with the words explained in the ninth of the Ten Articles of a.d. 153() in the given above. "And in like manner before the dealing of the following words : "As concerning the rites and ceremonie.? holy bread these words : of Christ's Church ; ... as sprinkling of lioly water to put us in remembrance of our Baptism, .and the blood of Christ sprinkled for our redemption upon the cross ; giving of holy bread, to put us in remembrance of the Sacrament of the altar, that .all Christian men be one body mystical of Christ as the bread is made of many grains, and yet but one loaf : and to put us in remembrance of the receiving the holy sacra- ment and body of Christ, the whicli we ought to receive in right cliarity ; which in the beginning of Christ's Church, men did more often receive than they use nowadays to do." [Lloyd's Formul. of Faith, p. 15.] The fourtli of some injunctions issued by the King's Visitors in a.d. 1548, also ' Of Christ's liody this is a token. Which ou the cross for our sins was broken ; Wherefore of his death if you will be partakei-s, Of "Vice and sin you must be forsakers." And the clerk in the like manner shall bring down the Pax, and standing without the church door shall say boldly to the people these words ; ' This is a token of joyful peace, which is betwixt God and men's conscience : Christ alone is the Peacemaker, 'Which straitly commands peace between brother and brother. ' And so long as ye use these ceremonies, so long shall ye use these significations." [Burnet's Reform, V. 186, Pocock's ed.] 8 an l^istocical IntroDuctioii In 1531 this revised edition of the Salisbiiiv Poitiforium or Breviary was reprinted, and two years later a revised Missal was published ; iu the latter spuL-ial care being taken to provide an apparatus for enabling the people to find out the places of the Epistles and Gospels. And though no authorized translation of the Bible had yet been allowed by Henry VIII., Craumer and the other Bishops began to revise Tyndale's translation iu 1534, and encouraged the issue of books containing the Epistles and Gospels in English, of which many editions were published between 1538 and the printing of the Prayer Book.^ A fresh impulse seems thus to have been given to the use of the old English Prymers, in which a large portion of the Services (including the Litany) was translated into the vulgar tongue, and also a third of the Psalms, and to which in later times the Epistles and Gospels were added. In 1540 the Psalter was printed by Grafton in Latin and English [Bodleian Lib., Douce BB. 71], and there seems to have been an earlier edition of a larger size about the year 1534. The Psalter had long been rearranged, so that the Psalms were said in consecutive order, in some chiu-ches at least, according to our modern practice, instead of in the ancient but comple.x order of the Brevia-y. [See Introd. to Psalter.] In 1541 and 1544 other amended editions of the Salisbury Breviary were published in the title- pages of which it is said to be purged from many errors. By order of Convocation [March 3, 1541] the Salisbury Use was now also adopted throughout the whole Province of Canterbury, and an uniformity secured which had not existed since the days of Augustine. Nor is it an insignificant circumstance that the book was now printed b}' Whitchurch (from whose press issued the Book of Common Prayer), instead of being printed in Paris as formerly. That these revisions of the ancient Service-books were steps towards a Reformed English Breviary or Portiforium is confirmed by the course of events. Something in the nature of a confirmation is also aSbrded by a comparison of these attempts with others of a similar kind Avhich were made abroad towards obtaining a Reformed Roman Breviary. Some years after the Convocation of the Church of England had issued the 151G edition of the Salisbury L^^se, Leo X. gave directions to Zaccharia Ferreri de Vicence, Bishop of Guarda, in Portugal, to prepare a new version of the Breviaiy Hymns. This was done, and the volume published under the authority of Clement VII. in 1525, with this prominent announcement of a Reformed Breviary on the title-page: " Breviarium Ecclesiasticiun ah eodeni Zach. Pont, longe brevms et faciliiis redditum et ab omni eii'oi'c piirgatum propediem exibit." The promised reform was actually effected by Cardinal Quignonez, a Spanish Bishop, and was published under the same authority as the Hymnal, in 1535-3G. But this Reformed Roman Breviary was intended chiefly, if not entirely, for the use of the clergy and monks in their private recitations ; and its intro- duction in some places for choir and public use eventually led to its suppression in 1568. No provision whatever was made (as there had been iu connection with the English reform) for adapting it to the use of the laity. During the whole forty years of its use there is no trace of any attempt to connect the Breviary of Quignonez with vernacular translations of Prayers or Scriptures. And, although it was undoubtedly an initiatory step in the same direction as that taken by our own Reformers (who indeed used the Breviaiy of Quignonez in their subsequent proceedings), yet it was never followed up, nor intended to be followed up ; and the object of the Roman reform throws out in stronger light that of the English.'- A very decided advance towards the Prayer Book system had been made in 153(5, when in the Province of York, and almost certaiidy in that of Canterbury also, an Archicpiscopai order was issued that " all curates and heads of congregations, religious and other, privileged ami other, shall every holy-day read the Gospel and the Epistle of that day out of the English Bible, plainly and distinctly ; and they that have such grace shall make some declaration either of the one or of both (if ' See the List of Printeil Service-Books accorilins to tlie ancient Uses of tlic Knclish Cliurcli, compiled by .\lr. F. II. Dickin-son, and reprinted from tlic ICrclr.iioloyixl of Feb. 18r)0. - The Reformed I'reviary of Cardinal Quignonc/ was begun latest edition was printed in 1.5GC, and tlic Breviary w.os suppressed in I.'iCiS. 'J'he title-pages vary, and so do the pre- faces, and if there are not two recensions of the Breviary, there certainly are two of the jireface to it ; which, as is under Clement Vll— "cju3(|ue Iwjrtatu et jussu "—who ex-- shewn further on, w.os Largely used by the writer of the Pre- communicated Henry VIII. It was afterwards .approved and j face to the Prayer Book of I.IW. recommended to the clergy by Paul HI. in a Bull d.atcd in a ! ForafuUaccountofQuignonez's Breviary, sfe Claude Jolt's Paris edition of 153(5 as issued on Febru.ary ■'{, ir>.'t."i, but in an Antwcrj) bl.ack-Iettcr edition in the Bodleian Library as issued on July .3, l.")li(>. It appears to have gone through at least seventeen editions, being printe14 : [4] The Prayer of St. Chryfios- tfim ; [5] A jiraycr for men to s.-iy entering into battle : [(il A MS. 44 in Cosin's Libr.ary, Durham. It is corrected in the li.ind- writing of Bisho]) Cosin, who adds against Redmaync's name "dubito," and before th.at of Cox "Dcest Decanus Sti I'auli (juisquis cr.at ma.x. o])inor. " The lives of these and other "compilers" of the Prayer Book were written at sonic length liy Samuel Downes, Fellow prayer for the king, the older and longer form of that now in ^ of St. John's College, Oxford, and were published by an nsc. ancestor of the publishers of the present work, Charles The special prayer relating to war suggests that the volume Rivington, in 1722. to tbe Praj>er l^oofe. 15 George Day . John Skip Thomas Thirlby Nicholas Ridley William May Richard Cox , John Taylor . Simon Heyues Thomas Robertson John Redmayne . Bishop of Chichester. Bishop of Hereford. Bishop of Westminster. Bishop of Rochester [afterwards of London]. From the Lower House of Convocation. Dean of St. Paul's. Dean of Ch. Ch. and Chanc. of Oxford Univ. [afterwards Bishop of Ely]. Dean of Lincoln [afterwards Bishop of Lincoln], Prolocutor. Dean of Exeter. Archdeacon of Leicester [afterwards Deau of Durham]. Master of Trin. Coll., Camb. In what manner the Convocation of the Province of York was represented is not on record ; but from the proceedings of 1661 (which would be founded on strict precedent) there can be no doubt that its co-operation was obtained in some way ; and the names of the Archbishop of York and his Suffragans are indeed contained in a list of Bishops who were indirectly or directly mixed uj) with those above recorded. There can be no doubt also that they acted under a Royal Commission. No records of their meetings are known, but they are found together on one occasion during the progress of their work, namely, on Sunday, September 9, 1548, when Farrar was consecrated Bishop of St. David's by Cranmer, Holbech, and Ridley, in the Chapel of the Archbishop's house at Chertsey. On that day the Archbishop celebrated Mass by the old Office, and used English words of administration : and the Archiepiscopal Register records that " there communicated the Reverend Fathers, Thomas [Goodrich], Bishop of Ely ; Thomas [Thirlby], Bishop of Westminster ; Henry [Holbech], Bishop of Lincoln ; Nicholas [Ridley], Bishop of Rochester ; and Farrar, the new Bishop ; together with William May, Dean of St. Paul's ; Simon Hains, Dean of Exon ; Thomas Robertson and John Redman, Professors of Divinity, and others."^ Beyond this hai)py glimpse of these Divines we know nothing of their move- ments ; nor have any records been discovered which throw any light upon the details of their work. It appears, however, to have occupied them for several months, notwithstanding their previous labours ; and there is every mark of deliberation and reverence in the result. The foundation of their work, or rather the quarry out of which they extracted their chief materials, was the Reformed Salisbury Use of 1516 and 1541 : but some other books were evidently used by them, and it may be safely concluded that they did not end their labours before they had gone through a large amount of liturgical research. The following list may be taken as fairly representing the principal books which the Committee of Convocation had before them as the materials for their work of revision : — The Salisbury Portiforium,^ Missal, Manual, and Pontifical. The York and other Uses.^ The Mozarabic Missal and Breviary.^ The Reformed Breviary of Cardinal Quiguonez. 1.535-36.^ Simplex ac Pia Deliberatio of Hermann, Archbishoj) of Cologne. 1545.* The same in English. 1548.'^ (A previous edition also in 1547.) ' Strype's Cranmer, ii. 105, Eccl. Hist. Soc. ed. In his Memorials Strype says that they met at Windsor in May. [Strype's Mem. Eccl. II. i. 133.] Heylin says tliey met at Windsor on September Ist. [Heylin's Hist. Reform, i. 132, Eccl. Hist. Soc. ed.] ' "Breviarium seu Portiforium secundum Morem et Con- suetudinera Ecclesiae Sarisburiensis Anglicans." It is called " Salisbury Use " in the Preface of our Prayer Book : and that term, or Sarum Use, is adopted generally for the Breviary, Missal, and other Service-books of the same origin. ' Referred to in the Prayer Book Preface, as "Hereford Use, the Use of Bmi'jor, York Use, and Lincoln Use." * " Missale Mixtum secundum regulam beati Isidori, dictum Mozarabes . . . impressum Toleti iussu P. Francisci Ximenes. 1500." "Breviarium secundum regulam beati Isidori . . . impressum Toleti jussu D. Francisci Ximenes. 1502." ^ "Breviarium Komanum, ex sacra potissimum Scriptura, et probiitis Sanctorum historiis nuper confectum, ac deuuo per eundem Authorem accuratius recognitum, eaque diligentia lioc in anno a mendis ita purgatum, ut Momi judicium non pertimescat. Lugduni. 1543. ^ " Simplex ac pia deliberatio de Reformatione Ecclesiarum Electoratus Coloniensis. " ' " A simple and religious consultation of us Hermann by the grace of God Archbishop of Colone and Prince Elector, etc., by -what meanes a Christian reformation, and founded in God's worde. Of doctrine. Administration of Divine Sacra- ments, Of Ceremonies, and the whole cure of soules, and other ecclesiastical ministries, may be begun among men until the lord graunte a better to be appoynted, either by a free and christian counsaile, generall or national, or else by the states I'f the Empire of the nation of Germany, gathered together in the Holy Ghost, Perused by the translator thereof and amended in many places. 1548. Imprinted at London by Jhon Daye and William Seres dwellynge in Sepulchre's paryshe i6 an !t)istoricaI Jntrotiuction The Prjauer in English of vai'ious dates.* The" Great "Bible.2 How far the Book of Cuuiiiiou Prayer was influenced by these works will be shewn in the niargin and the footnotes of the following pages. But even a superficial glance at the latter will make it apparent that the new book was, substantially, as it still remains, a condensed reproduction, in English, of those Service-books which had been used in Latin by the Church of England for many centuries before. The Reformation in Gennany was in active progress at this time (not having yet lost the impetus given to it by the strong-handed leadership of Luther),and Cranmer had been much in coiTespondence with Melanchthon and some other German divines during the reign of Henry VIII. But these foreign reformers had scarcely any influence upon the Prayer Book of l.")49 ; and were probably not even consulted during its progi-ess towards completion Melanchthon and Bucer assisted the Archbishop of Cologne in preparing his "Consultation" (one of the books refened to), and they probably used Luther's version of the ancient Nuremberg offices. But this volume contributed little to our Prayer Book beyond a few clauses in the Litany, and some portions of the Baptismal Service; and it is somewhat doubtful whether in the case of the Litany our English form was not in reality the original of that in Hermann's book. Most likely the latter was translated and brought before Convocation with the hope that it would have much influence; but the Committee of Revision were too wise and too learned in Liturgical matters toattach much importance to it.^ It i.s, in some respects, unfortunate that we cannot trace the book of 1549 into any further detail during the time when it was in the hands of the Committee. We cannot even form any definite con- jecture as to the parts respectively taken by its members in the work before them ; nor can one of the original collects which they inserted be traced back to its author. And yet there is some satisfaction in this. The book is not identified with any one name, but is the work of the Church of England by its authorized agents and representatives ; and as we reverence the architects of some great cathedral for their work's sake, without perhaps knowing the name of any one of them, or the portions which each one designed, so we look upon the work of those who gave us our first English Book of Common Prayer, admiring its fair proportions, and the skill which put it together; and caring but little to inquire whose was the hand that traced this or that particular compartment of the whole. Although thus unable to trace out the work of each hand in this gi-eat undertaking, we can, however, by means of internal evidence, and a comparison with the older formularies, find out the nature of their labours, and something of the manner in which they went about them, changes made in It was made a first principle that everything in the new Prayer Book was to be in the Services. English ; a principle respecting which, as has been shewn before, there seems to have been not the slighte.st doubt or hesitation. Their first labour was, then, that of condensing the old services into a form suitable for the object in view, and yet keeping up the spuit and general purpose of the original and ancient worship of the Church. [1] A great step was made in this direction by substituting a Calendar of Lessons referring to the Holy Bible for the Lessons at length as they had been hitherto printed in the Breviary. This made it possible to combine the Breviary [daily services], the Missal [Holy Communion], Epistles and Gospels (etc.), and the ^[auual [Occasional Offices], in one volume. A precedent for this was offered by a practice which had been adopted in the fifteenth century of printing the Communion Service (thougli not the Epistles and Gospels) as part of the Breviary.'* The Marriage Service was also printeil in the Missal, which was a precedent for introducing the other services of the Manual into the Prayer Book. [2] The next step towards condensation was the adoption of a less variable system in the daily services, so that the Collect of the day, the Lessons, and the Psalms should be almost the only portions of Mattins and Evensong which needed to be changed from day to day, or week to week. ,-it the signc of the Resurrection, alytle aboue Holbourne ninlaries for Lutlior, and who -nag also the original compiler Conduit Cum gratia et privilegio imprimendum solum." of a Catechism for Nuremberg and Urandenbcrg, of «hicli This translation was probably the work of Coverdale. , that of Justus Jonas is a Latin translation. John ii La.sco is 1 ,SVe Maskell'.s Monumenta Ritualia Ecdesife Anglicana; Raid to have had some intiuence with Cranmer, and he cer- vol. ii ; and Bikton'h Three Primers of Henri/ Vlff. tainly lived with the Archbishop at Lambeth from September -' "The Byble in Englyshe, that is to saye, the content of to February in tlie year 1.548-49. But the Prayer Book was all the holy scripture bothe of y« olde and newe testament, before Parliament on December!), 1,")48, and w.as before the truly translated after the vcrytc of the Hebrue and Creke King in Council previously. It passed tlie Lords on January textes, by y<^ dylygcnt studye of diverse excellent learned men, l.")th, and tlie ComnKuis on the IJlst, l.")49. Foreigners were expert in the forsaydc tonges. Printed by Rychard Grafton very forwanl in interfering, but their suggestions were civilly and Kdward Whitchurch. Cum privilegio ail imprimendum put aside .at this time, solum. l.i.SO." ■* I'l'cy are so jirinted, for example, in Snnim Breviaries of ' It m.ay be added that Cranmer had married a niece of 1409, l.W, \mO, l.|)14, l.")3."), I.'VII ; in tlie British Museum Osiander, who is said to have prepared the Nuremberg for- and Bodleian Libraries. to the Pcagcr 113ook. 17 [3] Lastly, the several hours of Prayer were condensed into two, Mattins and Evensong, with a third added on Sundays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, in the form of the Litany. The ancient arrange- ment of the day for Divine Service was as follows : — Nocturns or Mattins ; a service before daybreak. Lauds ; a service at daybreak, quickly following, or even joined on to, Mattins. Prime ; a later morning service, about six o'clock. Tierce ; a service at nine o'clock. Sexts ; a service at noon. Nones ; a service at three o'clock in the afternoon. Vespers ; an evening service. Compline ; a late evening service, at bedtime. These services were often, if not generally, " accumulated " in the Mediaeval Church as they are at the present day on the Continent; several being said in succession, just as Mattins, Litany, and the Communion Service have been " accumulated," in modern times, in the Church of England. But the different offices had many parts in common, and this way of using them led to unmeaning repetitions of Versicles and Prayers. This evil was avoided by condensing and amalgamating them, so that repe- titions took place only at the distant hours of Morning and Evening. The services of Mattins, Lauds, and Prime, were thus condensed into Mattins ; those for Vespers and Compline into Evensong. The three other hours appear (from a table of Psalms given in the Litroduction to the Psalter) to have ftxlleu out of public use long before the reformation of our offices ; and they were probably regarded as services for monastic and private use only.^ The general result of this process of condensation will be best seen by the following table, in which the course of the ancient Mattins, Lauds, and Prime, is indicated side by side with that of the Mattins of 1549 ; and in the same manner, Vespers and Com- pline are set parallel with Evensong. From this comparison it will be clearly seen that the Book of Common Prayer was framed out of the ancient Offices of the Church of England, by consolidation and translation of the latter, the same principles which have been above indicated being also extended to the Communion Service and the Occasional Offices. The details of the changes that were made will be found in the notes under each portion of the Prayer Book in the following pages. The Ancient Daily Services and those of 1549. Salisbury Use. Prayer Book of 1549. Mattins. Lamls. Prime. Jl/aWms. Invocation. y. and RT. Invocation. Our Father. Our Father. Our Father. Lord, open Thou. Lord, open Thou, God, make speed. God, make speed. God, make speed. God, make speed. Glory be. Glory Ije. Glory be. Glory be. Alleluia. Alleluia. Alleluia. Alleluia. Venite, exultemus. Venite, exultemua. Hymn. Hymn. Psalms. Psalms. Psalms. Psalms. Lessons. 1st Lesson. Te Deum Te Deum or Benedicite. Canticle. Athauasian Creed. Short chapter. Short cliapter. 2nd Lesson. Hymn. Benedictus. Benedictus. Creed. Lesser Litany. Lesser Litany. Our Father. Our Father. Suffrages. [Creed,] Suffrages, Con- fession and Absolution. Suffrages. 1st Collect. 1st Collect. 2nd CoUect. 2nd Collect. 3rd Collect. ,Srd Collect. Intercessory Prayers. See also No. 4 of the Injunctions which are printed on p. 12. p. i8 an Ipistorical JntroDuction The Anciest Daily Services and those of lb49— continued. Salisbury Use. Prayer Book of 1549. Vespers. Compline. Evensong. Invocation. Invocation. Our Father. Our Father. Our Father. God, make speed. God, make speed. God, make speed. Glory be. Psalm3. Psalms. Psalms. Short chapter, 1st Lesson. Hymn. Magnificat. Magnificat. Short chapter. 2nd Lesson. Hymn. Nunc Dimitti.'. Nunc Dimittis. Creed. Lesser Litany. Lesser Litany. Lesser Litany. Our Father. Our Father. Our Father. Suffrages. Suffrages, [Creed,] Con- fession and Absolution. Suffrages. 1st Collect. 1st Collect. 2nd Collect. 2nd Collect. .3rd Collect. .Srd Collect. Intercessory Prayers. When these learned Divines had completed their work, the Prayer Book ^vas submitted to Con- vocation (which met on November 24, 1548), that it might go forth with the full authority of the Church. 1 It was then communicated to the King in Council, and afterwards laid before Parliament on December 9, 1.548, that it might be incorporated into an Act of Parliament [2nd and 3rd Edw. VI. cap. 1]. This Act (including the Prayer Book) j^assed the House of Lords on January 15, and the House of Commons on January 21, 1549. It was the first Act of Uniformity, and it enacted that the Prayer Book should come into use in all churches on the Feast of Whitsunday following, which was June 9, 1549. The Book itself was published on March 7, 1549, thus allowing three months' interval, during which the Clergy and Laity might become acquainted with the new Order of Divine Service. But where it could be procured earlier it was permitted to take it into use three weeks afterwards, and thus, in London churches, it was generally used on Easter-Day, April 21, 1549. The Book of Common Prayer thus set forth with the full authority of Church and State may very fairly be called an expurgated and condensed English Version of the ancient Missal which was used for the celebration of the Holy Communion, the ancient Portiforium or Breviary which was used for the Daily Prayers, and the ancient Manual which was used for the Occasional Services, such as Baptism and Marriage : these ancient or Mediaeval Services being themselves elaborated forms of much more primitive ones. The Committee of Revision having followed the directions given to them in 1542 the Mediaeval books had been "castigated from all . . . feigned legends, superstitious orations, collects, versicles, and responses," the services provided for " all saints which be not mentioned in the Scripture or authentical doctors " were " abolished and put out of the same books," and what was retained was " the Service . . . made out of the Scripture and other authentic doctors." The Seven Daily Offices were condensed into two, the system for the use of Psalms and Lessons was ' Archbishop Bancroft, who was for many years Chaplain to Cox, Bishop of Ely, one of the Committee of Revision, writes that "the first Liturgy set forth in King Edward's reign was carefully compiled, and confirmed by a Synod. " [CoLLlEF.'.s Kcd. Hid. vi. 277.] Archbishop Abbot say.s that "the more material parts were disputed and debated in the Convocation House by men of both parties." [Abhot aijninat llill, p 104.] Contemporary evidence respecting tlie confirmation of the Book by Convocation is also found in letters of the King and of tlie Privy Council. [1] The I'rivy Council instructed Dr. Ho]iton, the Princess Mary's Cliapl.iin, to .s,iy to her respeotinj,' the Prayer Book, "The fault is great in any suhjcit to disallow a law of the King ; a law of the realm by long study free disputation, and nnijortn determiiialion of the trhole C'l/'n/!/, consulted, debated, concluded." (Koxe's Actx nmi Mon. vi. 8, ed. 1838] [2] In the reply of Edward \'I. to the demands of the Devonshire rebels the King is made to say, "Whatsoever is contained in our book, either for Baptism, Sacr.ament, Mass, Confirmation, and serx^ice in the Church, is by our Parlia- ment established, by the whole Cleriji/ ai/ireil, yea, by tlie Bishops of the realm devised, by (iod's Word confirmed." [Foxe'.s Act.'i and Mon. v. "34 ed. 1838.] [3] The King and Council, writing to Bishop Bcmner on July 23, 1549, say, "One uniform Order for ComnMn IVayers and Administration of the .Sacraments hath been and is most godly .set forth, not only by the common agreement and full assent of the Nobility and Commons , ed. 18.'{8. ] No doubt the Convocation of York co-operated in Bonie way, as on subsequent occasiims, with that of Canterbury. to tftc Praper IBock. 19 greatly simplified ; and although the ritual system in general was retained, the rubrics were condensed throughout, and many details of ritual omitted. When all the changes are taken into account it may still be said that about nine-tenths of what is contained in the Prayer Book of 1549 came from the old Latin Service-books of the Church of England : and that the principal alteration after the excision of Mediaeval novelties was that of adapting the Services to general use by the Clergy and Laity together, instead of leaving them in the complex form which was only suitable for the use of the Clergy and of Monastic communities. If it was in one sense new, they who had been engaged upon it felt so strong a conviction that it was substantially identical with the old, that in after days Cranmer offered to prove that " the order of the Church of England, set out by authority of Edward the Sixth, was the same that had been used in the Church for fifteen hundred years past."' In the Act of Parliament which enacted the Book of Common Prayer, it was said to have been composed under the influence of the Holy Ghost ; and there is, doubtless, an indication of this belief in the choice of the day on which it was enjoined to be used. So solemn were the views which those who arranged and set forth the Prayer Book took of their work, so anxious was their desire that it should be sealed with the blessing of God. THE REVISED PRAYER BOOK OF A.D. L552. It was unfortunate for the peace of the Church of England that those who were in authority at this period were disposed to yield too much to the influence of foreigners whose principles were totally alien from those on which the English Reformation was based. That Reformation had been strictly Catholic in its origin and in its official progress, and the repudiation of foreign interference with the Church of England had been one of its main features. But foreign interference now arose from a different quarter, Calvin and his associates endeavouring, with characteristic self-assurance, to bias the mind of England towards Genevan Presbyterianism rather than Anglican Catholicity. Calvin himself thrust a correspondence upon the Protector Somerset, upon the young King, and upon Archbishoi) Cranmer.^ A letter of his still exists in the State Paper Office, which was written to the Duke of Somerset on October 22, 1548, and in which he urges the Protector to push the Reformation further than it had hitherto gone. Others to the same purpose may be found in Strype's Memorials of Cranmer [iii. 25]. Peter Martyr and Martin Bucer (neither of whom could understand the English language) were placed in the most important positions at Oxford and Cambridge by Somerset ; John a Lasco, a Polish refugee, was quartered upon Cranmer for six months, and afterwards established in a schismatic position in London ; and Poullain [Valerandus Pollanus] was, in a similar manner, established at Glastonbury.^ These aj^pointments shew the manner in which the Church of England was sagaciously leavened with foreign Protestantism by those who wished to reduce its principles and practices to their own low ritual and doctrinal level ; and they are but a few of the many indications which exist that the Puritanism by which the Church was so imperilled during the succeeding hundred and twenty years arose out of foreign influences thus brought to bear upon the young Clergy and the Laity of that generation. These influences soon began to affect the Book of Common Prayer, which had been, with so much forethought, learning, and pious deliberation, prepared by the Bishops and other Divines who composed the Committee to which reference has so often been made. It had been accepted with satisfaction by most of the Clergy and the Laity ; * and had even been taken into use by many at Easter, although not enjoined to be used until Whitsunday, so desirous were they of adopting the vernacular service. It was, probably, the quiet acceptance of the Prayer Book by the Clergy which raised hopes in the foreign party of moulding it to their own standard of Protestantism. It is certain that an agitation had been ^ Bp. Jereiiy T.4ylor's Work.f, vii. 292. 2 Heylin's Reforviation, i. 227, Eccl. Hist. Soc. ' The same hospitable but unwise cliarity towards religious refugees was shewn by James I. in the case of Antonio do Domiuis, Archbishop of Spalatro, and with most unfortunate results. * Even Bishop Gardiner's ollicial reply to the Privy Council on the subject was favourable to the Prayer book. "Heliad deliberately considered of all the Offices contained in the Common Prayer Book, and all the several branches of it : that though he could not h.ive made it in that manner, had the matter been referred unto him, yet that he found such things therein as did very well satisfj' his conscience ; and therefore, that he would not only execute it in his own person, but cause the same to be officiated l)y all those of his diocese." [Heylin's Reformation, i. 209, Eccl. Hist. Soc] Somerset, writing to Cardinal Pole, June 4, 1549, and sending him a Prayer Book, says that there was "a common agreement of all the chief learned men in the Realm " in favour of the new "form and rite of service." [State Papers, Dom. Edu: VI. vol. vii.] Edward VI. '.s reply to the Devonshire rebels asserts the same thing. 20 an IDistorical Jntrctiuction going ou, among the latter, from the very time wheu the Book of 1549 had beeu first brought into use. A Lasco, Peter Martyr, and Martin Bucer appear to have been continually corresponding about the Prayer Book, and plotting for its alteration, although they knew it only through imperfect translations hastily provided by a Scotchman named Aless, living at Leipsic, and by Sir John Cheke. Hooper, also, Chaplain first to the Duke of Somerset, then to the King, and afterwards Bishop of Gloucester, carried on a bitter opposition to it, having returned from Zurich, where he had been living for some years, just at the time that it came into use. Writing to Bullinger on December 27, 1549, he says: "The public celebration of the Lord's Supper is very far from the order and institution of our Lord. Although it is administered in both kinds, yet in some places the Supper is celebrated three times a day. . . . They still retain their vestments ^ and the candles before the altars ; in the churches they always chant the hours and the hymns relating to the Lord's Supper, but in our own language. And that Popery may not be lo.st, the Mass priests, although they are compelled to discontinue the use of the Latin language, yet most carefully observe the same tone and manner of chanting to which they were heretofore accustomed in the Papacy." [Parker Soc. Orig. Lett. p. 72.] Preaching before Edward YI. in the following Lent, Hooper spoke of the Prayer Book as containing " tolerable things to be borne with for the weak's sake awhile," - and urged immediate revision. He also told the King and Council that it was " great shame for a noble King, Emperor, or Magistrate, contrary unto God's word to detain and keep from the devil or his minister any of their goods or treasure, as the candles, vestments, crosses, altars." He also urged the young King to do away with kneeling at the Holy Communion, " sitting were in my opinion best for many considerations." [Hooper's Works, i. 534, 530, 554 ; Orig. Lett. p. 81.] Bucer was perhaps the most violent of all opponents of the Pra3'er Book, publishing a " Censure " of it in twenty-eight chapters just before his death in 1551, in which he condemns all ceremonies and customs derived from the ancient Services of the Church of England, from the Consecration of the Holy Eucharist to the ringing of church bells, of which, with the want of imagination and musical ear so common among his class of Reformers, he had a great abhorrence. Meanwhile the Prayer Book had been brought under discilssion in Convocation towards the end of the year 1550. The question was sent down to the Lower House by the Bishops, but was postponed until the next session. What was done further at that time does not appear, though it is probable that the consideration of the Thirty-nine Articles absorbed the whole attention of Convocation for several sessions, and that the proposition for a revised Prayer Book was set aside, as far as the official assembly of the Church was concerned. The young King had now, however, been aroused by the meddlesome letters of Calvin, by Hooper's preaching, and perhaps by some of the Puritan courtiers, to entertain a strong personal desire for certain changes in Divine Service ; and not being able to prevail on the BishojJS to accede to his wishes, he declared to Sir John Cheke — with true Tudor feeling, being then only a little over twelve years of age — that he should cause the Prayer Book to be altered on his own authority. [Strype's Cranmer, ii. G63, Eccl. Hist. Soc. ed.] No records remain to shew us in what manner or by whom this revision was ultimately made. It has been suggested by Dr. Card well [Tivo Liturgies of Edw. VL xvii. n.] that the Convocation delegated its authority to a Commission appointed by the King, and that this Commission was the same with that which had set forth the Ordinal of 1550, consisting of " six Prelates, and six other men of this Realm, learned in God's law, by the King's Majesty to be appointed and assigned ; " but of which only the name of Bishop Heath of Worcester is recorded. \_See Introd. to Ordin. Services.] Archdeacon Freeman considers it to be " all but certain that it was the Ordinal Commission which conducted the Revision of 1552," especially because the Ordinal was affixed to the Act of Parliament by which the revised Book was legalized.^ There is no certain proof that the Prayer Book of 1552, commonly called the Second Book of Edward VI., ever received the sanction of Convocation ; yet it is highly improbable that Cranmer would have allowed it to get into Parliament without it.* Edward's of England by the King's autlioritj' and tlio Parliament, con- cerning the manner and form of praying and ministering the Sacrament in the Church of England, likewise also the liook of Ordering Mini.sters of the Church set forth by the foresaid authority, are godly and in no point repugnant to the ■whole- some doctrine of the Gospel, lint agreeable thereunto, further- ing and beautifying the same not a little : and therefore of all faithful ministers of the Church of England, and chiclly of the ministers of the Word, they ouglit to be received and allowed with all reatembcr 27, 1552, an Order in Council ^ was passed forbidding any further issue of the book, ostensibly on the ground that many printer's errors had crept in. But the real reason is shewn by the Register of the Privy Council : for on the same day a letter was written to the Archbishop requesting him to correct the printer's eiTors, and directing him to call in several Divines for the pui-pose of perusing or revising the book once more, his attention being specially drawn to the rubric on kneeling at the Holy Communion. The letter itself is not preserved, but only the order directing the Secretary what to write : Cranmer's indignant reply is however among the State Papers [Dom. Edtv. VI. xv. 15], and throws so much light on the circumstances under which the revised Prayer Book was issued that it is here printed at length, the italics, however, not being in the original, and the spelling being modernized : — " After my right liumble commendations unto yuur good Lord.sliip.s. " Where I understand by your Lordships' letters that the King's majesty bis pleasure is that the Book of Common Service sliould be diligently perused,- and therein the printer's errors to be amended. I shall travaile therein to the uttermost of my power — albeit I had need first to have had tlie book written which was past by Act of Parliament, and sealed with the great seal, which remaineth in the hands of Mr. Spilman, clerk of the Parliament, who is not in London, nor I cannot learn where he is. Nevertheless, I have gotten the copy which Mr. Spilman delivered to the printers to print by, which I think shall serve well enough. And where I under- stand further by your Lordships' letters that some be offended with kneeling at the time of the receiving of the sacrament, and would that I (calling to me the Bishop of London, and some other learned men as ]\Ir. Peter Martyr or such like) should with them expend, and weigh tlie said prescription of kneeling, whether it he fit to remain as a commandment, or to be left out of the book. I shall accomplish the King's Majesty his command- ment herein : — albeit I trust that we with just balance loeighed this at the malcing of tlie book, and not only we, but a great many Bishops and otln-rs of the best learned within this realm ajjpointed for that purpose. And now the book being read and approved by the whole State of the Realm, in the High Court of Parliament, with the King's majesty his royal assent — that this should be now altered again without Parliament — of what importance this matter is, I refer to your Lordships' wisdom to consider. I know your Lordships' wisdom to be such, that I trust ye will not be moved with these glorious and -unquiet spirits^ which can like nothing but that is after their own fancy ; and cease not to make trouble when things be most quiet and in good order. If suck men should be heard — (dthough the book were made every year anew, yet it should not lack faults in their opinion. 'But,' say they, ' it is not commanded in the Scripture to kneel, and whatsoever is not connnanded in the Scripture is against the Scripture, and utterly unlawful and ungodly.' But this saying is the chief foundation of the Anabaptists and of divers other sects. This saying is a subversion of all order as well in religion as in common policy. If this saying be true, take away the whole Book of Service ; for what should men travell to set in order in the form of service, if no order can be got but that is already prescribed by Scripture ? And because I will not trouble your Lordships with reciting of many Scriptures or proof in this matter, whosoever teacheth any such doctrine (if your Lordships will give me leave) I ivill set my foot by his, to be tried by fire, that his doctrine is untrue; and not only untrue, but also seditious and perilous to be heard of any subjects, as a thing breaking their bridle of obedience and losing from the bonds of all Princes' laws. " My good Lordships, I pray you to consider that there be two prayers which go before the receiving of the Sacrament, and two immediately follow — all which time the people praying and giving thanks do kneel. And what inconvenience there is that it may not be thus ordered, I know not. If the kneeling of the people should be discontinued for the time of the receiving of the Sacrament, so that at the receipt thereof they should rise up and stand or sit, and then immediately kneel down again — it should rather import a conteinptuous than a reverent receiving of the Sacrament. 'But it is not expressly contained in the Scripture' (say they) 'that Christ ministered the sacrament to his apostles kneeling.' Nor they find it not expressly in Scripture that he ministered it standing or sitting. But if we will follow the plain words of the Scripture ive should rather receive it lying down on the ground — as the custom of the world at that time almost everywhere, and as the Tartars and Turks use yet at this day, to eat their meat lying upon the ground. And the words of the Evangelist import the same, which be avaKeiiiai and ava-KlirTia, which signify, properly, to lie down upon the floor or ground, and not to sit upon a form or stool. And the same speech use the Evangelists where they sh(ew) that Christ fed five thousand with five loaves, where it is plainly expressed that they sat down upon the ground and not upon stools. "I beseech your Lordships take in good part this my long babbling, which I icrite as of myself only. The Bishop of London is not yet come, and your Lordships rec^uired answer with speed, and therefore am I constrained ' "A letter to Grafton the printer to stay in any wise from ; in which it is said that the King had caused the former Book uttering any of the books of the new Service, and if he have I of 1549 to be "perused, expIaiuL-d, and made fully perfect." distributed any of them amongst his company, that then he give strait commandment to every of tliem not to put any of them abroad until certain faults therein be corrected, It thus meant more than the correction of clerical errors. ^ This seems to refer to Bishop Hooper. In the order for his execution at Gloucester a similar expression is useil, [Frivy Council Bei/.] ; "forasmuch as the said Hooper is, as heretics be, a rain '-The word "perused" has a technical sense, the force (jf | ylorious person, and delighteth in his tongue." [Hooper's which is shewn by the Act which authorized the ]')0ok of li55"2. ' IVorls, II. xxvii.]. 22 an IDistorical JintroDiiction to make some answer to your Lordships afore his coming. And thus I pray God long to preserve your Lordships and to increase the same in all prosperity and godliness. "At Lambeth, this 7th of October, 1552, " Your Lordships to command, "T. Cante." What course Cranmer eventually took is not knowii, but the ultimate result is shewn by an entry in the Privy Council Eegister, dated October 27, 1552, which orders " a letter to the Lord Chancellor to cause to be signed unto the Book of Common Prayer, lately set forth, a certain Declaration signed by the King's Majesty, and sent unto his Lordship, touching the kneeling at the receiving of the Communion." [Buenet's i?e/o)-jn. iii. 368, Pocock's Note 76.] The " Declaration " which has been commonly known as " the Black Rubric " was then inserted in some of the already printed copies on a fly-leaf, and the printing was again proceeded with. But this delay must have prevented the book from being circulated through the country for use at the time appointed, and as Edward died only eight months later, on July 6, 1553, it may be doubted whether the earlier Prayer Book, that of 1549, was ever superseded to any great extent except in London. The chief importance of the Book of 1552 is derived from the circumstance that it was made the basis of tbose further revisions which resulted in the Prayer Book of ICG 1. THE REVISED PRAYER BOOK OF A.D. 1559. The Acts of Uniformity passed in the reign of Edward were legally repealed by 1 Mary, sess. ii. c. 2, which was passed in October 1553. By this Act the Services of the Church of England were restored The Prayer Book ^'^ ^^^ condition in which they were in the last year of Hemy VIIL A proclamation made imiawfui by was also issued, enjoining that no person should use " any book or books concerning the common service and administration set forth in Eno-lish to be used in the churches o of this realm, in the time of King Edward the Vlth, commonly called the Communion Book, or Book of Common Service and Ordering of Ministers, otherwise called the Book set forth by the authority of Parliament, for Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments ; but shall, within fifteen days bring or deliver the said books to the Ordinary, where such books remain, at the said Ordinary's will and disposition to be burnt." This Act and Proclamation were preceded, apparently, by an Act of Convocation of the same tenor ; for the Upper House had been requested by the Lower (both being beyond doubt " packed " assemblies at the time) to suppress the " schismatical book called the Communion Book, and the Book of Ordering Ecclesiastical Ministers." Thus the w'ork which had been done with so much care and deliberation was, for a time, set aside ; Divine Service was again said in Latin, and the customs of it reverted, to a great extent, to their mediceval form. As, however, the monasteries were not revived, the devotional system of Queen Mary's reign must, in reality, have been considerably influenced in the direction of reformation. We have already seen that " the last year of the reign of Henry VIIL" (which was the standard professedly adopted) was a period when much progress had been made towards establishing the devotional system afterwards embodied in the Book of Common Prayer ; and it seems likely that the services of the Church in the reign of Queen Mary were a modified form of, rather than an actual return to, the mediasval system which existed before the sixteenth century. Queen Elizabeth succeeded to the throne on November 17, 1558, and for a month permitted no change to be made in the customs of Divine Service. On December 27th of that year, a Proclamation was issued condemning unfruitful disputes in matters of religion, and enjoining all men " not to give audience to any manner of doctrine or preach- ing other than to the Gospels and Epistles, commonly called the Gospel and Epistle of the daj', and to the ten commandments, in the vulgar tongue, without exposition or addition of any manner, sense, or meaning to be applied or added ; or to use any other manner of publick prayer, rite, or ceremony in the Church, but that which is already used and by law received ; or the common Litany used at this present in her Majesty's own chapel ;^ and the Lord's Prayer, and the Creed, in English, until con- sultation may be had by Parliament, by her Majesty and her tln'ce estates of this realni,-' for the better ' TIio English Litany o! Henry VIII. See Stale Papers, Dora. Eliz. i. G8. ' Tliat is tlin TiOrds, the Commons, ami the Clergy. But see next note, wliicli elie\v.i that this intention, as regards Convocation, cmiM not have l)ccn carried imt. to ti)c ll^caj^er Xook. 23 conciliation and accord of such causes as at this present are moved in matters and ceremonies of religion." The first Act of Parliament in the reign of Queen Elizabeth restored to the Crown the supremacy over persons and in causes ecclesiastical, which had been taken away from it in the previous reign. But this does not seem to have been considered sufficient authority for dealing with the subject of Divine Service ; nor does it seem to have been possible, at first, to place it in £^abetii°a rei^gn"^ the hands of Convocation. An irregular kind of Committee was therefore appointed at the suggestion of Sir Thomas Smith, the Queen's Secretary, who were to meet at his house in Canon Row, Westminster, and who were " to draw in other men of learning and gravity, and apt men for that purpose and credit, to have their assents." This Committee consisted of the following persons : * — Matthew Parker, subsequently Abp. of Canterbury. Edmund Grindal, „ Bp. of London, Abp. of York, and Abp. of Canterbury. James Pilkington, „ Bp. of Durham. Richard Cox, ,, Bp. of Ely. William May, appointed Abp. of York, but died before consecration. William Bill, subsequently Dean of Westminster. Sir Thomas Smith, ,, Dean of Carlisle. David Whitehead, ,, [Declined the Archbishopric of Canterbury.] Edwin Sandys, ., Bp. of Worcester, and Abp. of York. Edmund Guest, „ Bp. of Rochester, and of Salisbury. The last two were summoned to attend upon the Committee after its first appointment. It has been supposed, from a vindication of the changes made which was sent by him to Cecil,^ that Guest was the person chiefly concerned in the revision, and that he acted for Parker, who was absent through illness. Cox and May were on the Committee of 1542-49. While this Committee was engaged on its labours, an attempt was made to reconcile the extreme Romanist party by a Conference of Divines held before the Privy Council and others in Westminster Abbey ; but the attempt failed through the impracticable temper of the leading men on the Romanist side : and thus the way was made clear for a new Act of Uniformity on the basis of those passed in Edward's reign. The Queen and Cecil both appear to have desired that the original Prayer Book, that of 1549, should be adopted as far as possible ; but the second Book, that of 1552, was taken by the Committee of Divines, and with a few alterations of some importance, submitted to the Queen to be set before Parliament. [1] A Table of Proper Lessons for Sundays was prefixed. [2] The " accustomed place " or Chancel, instead of " in such place as the people may best hear," was again appointed for the celebration of Divine Service. [3] The ancient " Ornaments of the Church and the Ministers which had been in use under the first Book of Edward, but had been reduced to a 'minimum by the second, were directed again to be taken into use. [4] The present form for administering the consecrated Elements to the Communicants was substituted for that ordered by the Book of 1552, which was the latter half only of that now used. As the first half of the words is the form that was used in the Book of 1549, the new form was thus a combination of the two. [5] The declaration respecting kneeling, which had been inserted on a fly-leaf at the end of the Communion Service in the Book of 1552, was now omitted altogether. Thus altered, the Book was laid before Parliament, which (without any discussion) annexed it to a new Act of Uniformity [1 Eliz. c. 2]. This Act was passed on April 28, 1559, and it enacted that the revised Prayer Book should be taken into use on St. John the Baptist's day following. It ' None of these were Bishops at this time. Parker, i to May S, 1559, was presided over by Bishop Bonner, with Grindal, Cox, and Sandys were consecrated in December 1559, ; Nicholas Harpsfield, Dean of Canterbury, for Prolocutor. Guestin March 15G0, and Pilkington in March 1561. Thereisa At the end of February 15.59 they presented five Articles of letter of Sir T. Wilson's, written in 1559 [Slatr Papers, Dom. ! the most Ultramontane character to the House of Lords, one Eliz. vii. 46], which states that the alterations were made "by the Convocation consisting of the same Bishops" who had returned after Queen Mary's death "and the rest of the of the Articles asserting Transubstantiation and another the Supremacy of the Pope : and such a Convocation would be too hostile to the Praver Book to be intrusted with its revision. Clergy." But the Convocation which sat from January 24th - Stbype's Anil. i. 120 : ii. 459. C.^kdweli.'s CoiiJ. p. 48 24 3n J^istorical 31ntroDuction was used, however, in the Queen's chapel on Sunday, May 12th, and at St. Paul's Cathedral on Wednes- day, May loth. After the appointed day had passed, a Commission was issued [July 19, 1559] to Parker, Griudal, and others for carr^dng into execution the Acts for Uniformity of Common Prayer, and for restoring to the Crown its jurisdiction in Ecclesiastical matters. [State Papers, Doin. Eliz. v. 18.] A Royal Visitation was also held in the Province of York, under a Commission dated July 25th. [Ibid. iv. 62.] It then appeared that the Prayer Book was so generally accepted by the Clergy, that out of 9400 only 189 refused to adopt it; this number including those Bishops and others of the most extreme Romanist party who had been appointed in Queen Mary's reign on account of what in modem times would be called their Ultramontane principles. It is worth notice, however, that the Book of Common Prayer as thus revised in 1559 was quietly accepted by the great body of Romanist laity ; and also that the Pope himself saw so little to object to in it that he offered to give the book his full sanction if his authority were recognized by the Queen and kingdom. " As well those restrained," said Sir Edward Coke, " as generally all the papists in this kingdom, not any of them did refuse to come to our church, and j'ield their formal obedience to the laws established. And thus they all continued, not any one refusing to come to our churches, during the first ten years of her Majesty's government. And in the beginning of the eleventh year of her I'eign, Cornwallis, Bedingfield, and Silyarde, were the first recusants ; they absolutely refusing to come to our churches. And until they in that sort began, the name of recusant was never heard of amongst us." In the same Charge, Coke also states as follows : That the Pope [Pius IV.] " before the time of his excommunication against Queen Elizabeth denounced, sent his letter unto her Majesty, in which he did allow the Bible, and Book oi Divine Service, as it is now used among us, to be authentick, and not repugnant to truth. But that therein was contained enough necessary to salvation, though there was not in it so much as might conveniently be, and that he would also allow it unto us, without changing any part : so as her Majesty would acknowledge to receive it from the Pope, and by his allowance ; which her Majesty denj^ing to do, she was then presently by the same Pope excommunicated. And this is the truth concerning Pope Pius Quartus as I have faith to God and men. I have oftentimes heard avowed by the late Queen her own words; and I have conferred with some Lords that were of greatest reckoning in the State, who had seen and read the Letter, which the Pope sent to that effect ; as have been by me specified. And this upon my credit, as I am an honest man, is most true." ^ It may have been with the object of making the Pope acquainted with the real character of the Prayer Book that it was translated into Latin in the same year ; and it is, possibly, to the work of translation that a document in the State Paper Office [Dom. Eliz. vii. 4G] refers which, on November SO, 15.")9, mentions the pi'ogress made by the Convocation in the Book of Common Prayer.- The Latin Version (differing in no small degree from the English) was set forth on April G, 15G0, under the authority of the Queen's Letters Patent. The only other change that was made in the Prayer Book during the reign of Elizabeth was in the Calendar. On January 22, 15G1, the Queen is-sued a Commission to the Archbishop of Canter- bury, the Bishop of London, Dr. Bill, and Walter Haddon, directing them "to pemse the order of the said Lessons throughout the whole year, and to cause some new calendars to be imprinted, whereby such chapters or parcels of less edification may be removed, and other more profitable may supply their rooms." ^ This commission was i-ssued by the authority given in the ISth clause of Elizabeth's Act of Unifonnity, which is cited in its opening paragi-aph ; and iu the end of it there is a significant direction, " that the alteration of any thing hereby ensuing be quietly done, without show of anj' innovation in the Church." In the Calendar revised by these Commissioners the names of most of those Saints were inserted which are to be found in that of our present Prayer Book. But although no further changes were made in the authorized devotional system of the Church during the remainder of the centurj-, continual assaults were being made upon it by the Puritan party, extreme laxity wa.s tolerated, and even sanctioned, by some of the Bishops (as, ft)r example, at North- ampton, by Bishop Scambler of Peterborough), and the people were gradually being weaned from their ' The IjOKD Coke, hia Speech and Chanje, London, 1607. See also Ca.mue.s, Ann. Eliz. p. .59, ed. 161.'). Twyspf.n's Ilislorkal Vimlication of the Church of Emjlaml, ji. 17">. Validity of the (Jrdersof the Church of Kmjland, by Hc.mpuhky Enijlish Ordinations, ii. 360, 378. Harrington's Pius 1 1'. and Ihr Hook of Common Prayer, ISfiG. - Sir Jolin M.a.son, however, writes to Cecil, on August i 1, 1.5-)9, that tliu HiMik nf ( oninion Service in Latin is ready to Prikkaix, D. D., 1688. Biumuai.i.'s JVorks, ii. S'l, cd. 184.-). ; jirint: and al.sothc little book of Private Tniyers for children Bp. Babinoton'h Nole« on the Pintateuch ; on Aumhcra vii. j and servants. [Stale Papers, Dom.. Eliz. vi.'ll.] Courayer'8 Defence of the Dissertation on the Validity of \ ^ Parker Coirespoiulence, p. 132. [Stale Papern, xvi. 7. to tf)e IPraj^er IBook. 25 love for a Catholic ritual : while, in the meantime, a gi-cat number of the new generation were being trained, by continual controversy and by enforced habit, into a belief that preaching, either in the pulpit or under the disguise of extemporaneous prayer, was the one end and aim of Divine Service.^ In 1592 the Puritans had grown so rancorous that they presented a petition to the Privy Council in which the Church of England is plainly said to be derived from Antichrist; the press swarmed with scurrilous and untruthful pamphlets against the Church system ; and the more sober strength of this opposition may be measured very fairly by the statements and arguments of Hooker in his noble work, the Ecclesiastical Polity. § Some slight Changes made in the Prayer Book of 1550 by James I. On the accession of James I. [May 7, 1603] the hopes of those Avho wished to get rid of the Prayer Book were strengthened by the knowledge that the King had been brought up by Presby- terians. A petition was presented to him, called the " Millenary Petition," from the number of signa- tures attached to it, in which it was represented that " more than a thousand " of his Majesty's subjects were " groaning as under a common burden of human rites and ceremonies," from which they prayed to be relieved by a reduction of the Prayer Book system to their own standard. The result of this petition was the " Hampton Court Conference," an assembly of orthodox and nonconforming Clergy, summoned by the King to meet in his presence at the Palace of Hampton Court, and discuss the grievances com- plained of This Conference met on the 14th, IGth, and 18th of January, 1G03-4, in the presence of the King and the Privy Council ; but the former was so disgusted with ^^^^ of James I. the unreasonableness of the Puritan opponents of the Prayer Book, that he broke up the meeting abruptly on the third day, without committing the Church to any concessions in the direction they required. Under the same clause of the Act of Uniformity by which Queen Elizabeth had directed a revision of the Calendar, the King did, however, with the advice of a Commission of Bishops and Privy Councillors, cause a few changes to be made in the Prayer Book.^ [1] The words " or remission of sins " were added to the title of the Absolution. [2] The " Prayer for the Royal Family " was placed at the end of the Litany ; and also some Occasional Thanksgivings. [3] Two slight verbal changes were made at the beginning of the Gospels for the Second Sunday after Easter and the Twentieth Sunday after Trinity. [4] An alteration was made in one of the Rubrics for Private Baptism. [See the Office.] [5] The title of the Confii'mation Service was enlarged. [G] The latter part of the Catechism, respecting the Sacraments, was added. [7] Some slight changes were made in the Calendar. The book, as thus altered, was authorized by a Royal Proclamation dated March 5, 1604, and it was afterwards sanctioned by Convocation in the SOth of the Canons passed in the same year [a.d. 1604], which ordered that " the churchwardens or questmen of every Church and Chapel shall, at the charge of the parish, provide the Book of Common Prayer, lately explained in some few points by his Majesty's authority, according to the laws and his Highness' prerogative in that behalf, and that with all convenient speed, but at the furthest within two mouths after the publishing of these our Constitutions." In the following year a petition was presented to the King from ministers in the Diocese of Lincoln, in which fifty " gross coiTuptions " in the Prayer Book were enumerated : and they demanded its total abolition as the only means by which the land could be rid of the idolatry and superstition which it enjoined. But although the Puritans continued to oppose the devotional system of the Church of England in this spirit during the whole of the reigns of James I. and Charles I., it was forty years before they succeeded in bringing about, and then for a few years only, that total abolition of the Prayer Book which they so ardently desired § The Suppression of the Prayer Book by the Puritans. The temporary overthrow of the Church of England was effected by the Long Parliament, which met on November 3, 1640, and lasted until April 20, 1653; and the successive steps by which ' These foreign fashions and principles were pertinaciously maintained by those who had fled the country in Queen Mary's days, and returned with what Parker called "Ger- nianical natures'' in Queen Elizabeth's. [Steype's ParVer, i. 1.56. Sae also Cap.dwell's Conf. 117-120, for a strong illus- tration of this iu Convocation.] " The Letters Patent rehearsing the authority and enumerat- ing the alterations are printed in C.\rdw ell's Conf. p. 217-225. 26 an l^istorical 3lntrotiuction this was accomplished are clearly stated by the Spei.ker of the House of Commons in the address which he made to the King from the bar of the House of Lords on May 19, 1602. " In order to this work," he said, " Church ornaments were first taken away ; then the means whereby distinc- tion or inequality might be upheld amongst ecclesiastical governors; then the forms of common prayer, which as members of the public body of Christ's Church were enjoined us, were decried as superstitious, and in lieu thereof nothing, or worse than nothing, introduced." [Journ. House of Lords, xi. 471.] The first movements towards this end were taken in December 1640, when " a petition was brought complaining of the Church discipline in having Archbishops, Bishops, etc., using the cross in Baptism, kneeling at the Communion, as unuseful in the Protestant Church " [Perfect Diurnal, p. 12] ; and when the House of Commons went to St. Margaret's Church as usual to receive the Holy Communion, they directed that the Communion Table should be brought down from the east end of the chancel and placed in the midst of them in the Presbyterian manner customary in Scotland. The House of Lords appointed a large Committee, consisting of ten Bishops and twenty lay peers, with power to add to their number, to consult respecting such alterations in the Prayer Book as would conciliate the Puritan ministers, who were persevering in their petitions for its abolition ; but although this Committee held many sittings between March 1st and May 1641, their efforts at conciliation were soon found to be useless, a motion " to agree upon some alterations and new additions to be inserted in the Book of Common Prayer" being made and lost in September of the same year, and the opponents of the Church going steadily on ^\^th their measures for its destruction.^ Shortly afterwards the House of Commons ordered that the Communion Table should everywhere be removed into the body of the church, that the rails should be taken away, and the raised east end of the chancel brought down to the same level as the rest of the church; and this was soon followed by "ordinances" against "innovations," as all the distinctive customs of the Church of England were called, which led to the removal of fonts from the churches, and to the wholesale destruction of Prayer Books, surplices, copes, organs, and all other "monuments of superstition," as these were called by the prevailing party in Parliament. Soon also, on December 29, 1041, most of the Bishops were thrown into prison, and in a few months the Puritans boasted that 8000 Clergy had already been turned out of their parishes. [Pierce's New Discoverer, p. 140.] On July 1, 1643, the "Westminster Assembly of Divines" was convened by the Parliament, and after some negotiation with the General Assembly of the Scottish Kirk, it accepted from the latter the " Solemn League and Covenant," which was subscribed by the House of Commons in St. Margaret's Church on September 2.5th, and was afterwards sent to every parish in England and Wales to be used as a Test during the Reign of Terror which followed. This document, which was signed with the solemnities of an oath, pledged those who signed it to substitute Presbyteriauism and the Scottish " Directory for Worship " for the Church of England and the Book of Common Prayer, in its first two Articles, which were as follows : — " I. That wc shall sincerely, really, and constantly, through the grace of God, endeavour, in our several places and calliiig.s, the preservation of the reformed religion in the Church of Scotland, in doctrine, worehip, discipline, and govcrniueiit, against our common enemies; the reformation of religion in the kingdoms of England and Ireland, in doctrine, worship, discipline, and government, according to the Word of God, and the example of the best reformed Churches; and shall endeavour to bring the Churches of God in the three kingdoms to tlie nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion, confession of faith, form of church government, directory for worship and catechizing ; that we and our posterity after us may as brethren live in faith and love, and the Lord may delight to dwell in tlie midst of us. " II. That we shall in Uke manner, without respect of persons, endeavour the extirpation of Popery, Prelacy ' Izaak 'Walton, in his Life of Bishop Sanderson, having ' and abate some of the Ceremonies that were least material, spoken of the discontent respecting the Prayer Hook which for satisfying their consciences. And to this end they did had been excited in England by the Scotch Covenanters, I meet together privately twice a week at the I lean of West- writes that "their party in Parliament mae used with safety. This custom was vindicated by Bishop Sanderson in a letter to a friend in 1652, and entitled "Judgement concerning submission to Usurpers," in which he also explains that he only ceased to use the Prayer Book itself when he was deprived of it by a troop of soldiers who, "immediately after Morning Service ended," on a Sunday in November 1644, "seized upon the book and tore it all in pieces." [\\'.\L'roN's Life of Sandeison, 1678. Sanderson's Cases of Conscience, 1685, p. 157.] Bishop Jeremy Taylor pubUshed a "Collection of Offices" for the same purpose. The following narrative respecting Bishop Bull gives us a graphic picture of the course adoptecf by these good men ; — "The iniquity of the times would not bear the constant and regular use of the Liturgy ; to supply, therefore, that mis- fortune, Mr. Bull formed all the devotions he offered up in public, while he continued minister of this place, out of the Book of Common Prayer, which did not fail to supply him with lit matter and proper words upon all those occasions that required him to apply to the throne of grace with the wants of his people. He had the example of one of the brightest lights of that age, the judicious Dr. Sanderson, to justify him in this practice : and his manner of performing the public service was with so much fervour and ardency of aifection, and with so powerful an emphasis in every part, that they who were most prejudiced against the Liturgy did not scruple to commend Mr. Bull as a person that prayed by the Spirit, though at the same time they railed at the Common Prayer as a beggarly element, and as a carnal per- formance. ' ' A particular instance of this happened to him while he was minister of St. George's, which, because it sheweth how valuable the Liturgy is in itself, and what unreasonable pre- judices are sometimes taken up against it, the reader will not, I believe, think it imworthy to be related. He was sent for to baptize the child of a Dissenter in his parish, upon which occasion he made use of the otiice of Baptism, as prescribed by the Church of England, which he had got entirely by heart ; and he went through it with so much readiness and freedom, and yet with so much gravity and devotion, and gave that bfe and spirit to all that he delivered, that the whole audience was extremely afJ'ected with his performance ; and notwithstanding that he used the sign of the cross, yet they were so ignorant of the offices of the Church that they did not thereby discover that it was the Common Prayer. But after that he liad concluded that holy action, the father of the child returned him a great many thanks, intimating at the same time with how much greater edification they prayed, who entirely depended upon the Spirit of God for His assist- ance in tlieir extempore effusions, than those did who tied themselves up to premeditated forms ; and that if he had not made the sign of the cross, that badge of Popery, as he called it, nobody could have formed the least objection against his excellent prayers. Upon which Mr. Bull, hoping to recover him from his ill-grounded prejudices, shewed him the office of Baptism in the I^iturgy, wherein was contained every pra3'er which he had offered up to God on that occasion ; which, with farther arguments that he then urged, so effectually wrought upon the good man and his whole family, that they always after that time frequented the parish church, and never more absented themselves from Mr. Bull's communion." [Nelson's Life of BvU, p. 31.] 28 an ipistorical :jiucoDuction THE REVISED PRAYER BOOK OF A.D. 16(32. It was quaintly said by Jeremy Taylor, comparing the fate of the Book of Common Prayer to that of the roll sent by Jeremiah to Jehoiakim, " This excellent Book hath had the fate to be cut in pieces with a penknife and thrown into the fire, but it is not consumed " [Taylor's Coll. of Offices, Pref.], and his faith and foresight were rewarded by seeing its full and complete resuscitation. When the Republican form of government collapsed upon the death of Cromwell, the restoration of the ancient Constitution of the country involved the restoration of its ancient Church, and consequently its ancient system of devotion as represented by the English Offices that had been in use for nearly a century before the Revolution. When the time drew near for the return of Charles II. to the throne of his fathers. Prayer Books were brought from their hiding-places, printers began to prepare a fresh supply, and its offices began to be openly used, as in the case of the good and gxeat Dr. Hammond, who was interred with the proper Burial Service on April 2G, 16G0. Before the end of IGGO the demand for Prayer Books had been so great, notwithstanding the number of old ones which had been preserved, that five several editions in folio, quarto, octavo, and a smaller size are known to have been printed.^ Charles II. landed in Eugland on May 2G, 1G60, the Holy Communion having been celebrated on board the " Naseby " at a very early hour in the morning ; probably by Cosin, the King's Chaplain, whose influence was afterwards so great in the revision of the Prayer Book. As soon as the Court was settled at Whitehall, Divine Service was restored in the Chapel Royal. On July 8th, Evelyn records in his Diary [ii. 152] that " from henceforth was the Liturgy publicly used in our Churches." Patrick is known to have used it in his church on July 2nd ; and Cosin, who reassumed liis position as Dean of Peterborough at the end of that month, immediately began to use it in his Cathedral. From Oxford, Lamplugh (subsequently Archbishop of York) ^vrites on August 23, 16G0, that the Common Prayer was then used everywhere but in three colleges,^ shewing how general had been its restoration in the University Chapels, and perhaps also in the City Churches. B}^ October 1G61, Dean Barwick had restored the Choral Service first at Durham, and then at St. Paul's. The feeling of the people is indicated by several petitions which Avere sent to the King, praying that their ministers might be compelled to use the Prayer Book in Divine Service, the Mayor and Jurats of Faversham (for example) complaining that their Vicar, by refusing to give them the Common Prayer, is " thus denying them their mother's milk."^ The nonconforming ministers at first allowed that they could use the greatest part of the Prayer Book ; yet when requested by the King to do so, with the concession that they should omit such portions as offended their consciences, they declined ;* but on the part of the Laity in general the desire for its restoration seems to have been much greater than could be supposed, considering how many had never (as adults) even heard a word of it used in church ; and probably had never even seen a Prayer Book. Before the King had left the Hague, a deputation of Presbyterian ministers, including Reynolds, 'Calamy, Case, and Manton, had gone over to him to use their influence in persuading him that the use of the Prayer Book having been so long discontinued, it would be most agreeable to the English people if it were not restored ; and especially to dissuade him from using it and the surplice, in the Chapel Royal. The subsequent conduct of the House of Commons ■"' shewed that this was a very daring misrepresentation of the state of the public mind on the subject ; but the King appears to have been aware that it was so, for he declined, with much warmth, to agree to the impertinent and unconstitu- tional request, telling them in the end of his reply, that " though he was bound for the present to ' The writer has examined eiglit copies of l(i(iO and one of | seized by mistake, supposing tlicm to be falsely printed. IGGl in tlie Library of thu British Museum, and also one of a | [Stnte i'apii:i, JJom. Chiirlcs II. xxxix. 87 ; xlvii. 07.] very rare edition, similar to a copy which formerly belonged I - Slate Vopr.rs, JJom. Churks 11. xi. 'SI. to .Mr. .M.i,skell [B. iM. 3407, 'J, which was discovered at the I » /jy, jj^xii. 97, 109 ; 1. 22. bottom of the I'arish Cheat of Grasmere in the year 1878. j ■* Kennett's Ke'jlMt.r, j). (i29. The .Museum Library posscsBes copies of all the sizes men- '■ The House of Lords proposed to insert a proviso in the tioned above. I Act of Uniformity m.aUing the use of the .Surplice and yigu of Among the State Papers there is a record tlunt .Tohn the Cross optional as "things indilTerent,"J)ut the House of AVilliams an7-3(>8. "Gr.-iml Debate between the most Reverend the I'ishops and the Presbyterian Divines. . . . The most perfect copy." l(jCI. See ,ilso Heywooi/.s Docnmfnts relnthnj to the Settlement of the Church 0/ Enijland by the Act of Cni/ormiti/ of l()(i'2, published in 1862. " Walton writes. Hishop Pearson "told me very lately that one of the Dissente^^ (uliich I could, but forbear to, name) appeared to Dr. .Sanderson to be so bold, so troublesome, and so illdfjical iu the dispute as forced patient Dr. .Sanderson, who W.1S then Bishop of Lincoln .and a Moderator with othir liishops, to s.ay with an unusual e.irnestness, that he hiid never met with a man of more pertinacious contiilcnce, aud less abilities, in all his couviisation." [W.m.ton'.s Life of Sntiileymn, sign. 1 3.] to tf)c Iprajjcr IBook. Perhaps too they were reminded of Lord Bacon's saying respecting his friends, the Nonconformists of an earlier day, that they lacked two principal tilings, the one learning, and tlie other love. The Conference was limited by the Letters Patent to four months' duration, but when that time had drawn to an end little had been done towards a reconciliation of the objectors to the use of the Prayer Book. Baxter had composed a substitute for it, occupying, as ho states in his Life and Times, " a fortnight's time " in its composition ; but even his friends would not accept it as such, and probably Baxter's Prayer Book never won its way into any congregation of Dissenters in his lifetime or after- wards. In Queen Elizabeth's time Lord Burleigh had challenged the Dissenters to bring him a Prayer Book made to fit in with their own principles ; but when this had been done by one party of Dissenters, another party of them offered six hundred objections to it, which were more than they offered to the old Prayer Book. The same spirit appears to have been shewn at the Savoy Conference; and the princijjle of unity was so entirely confined to unity in opposition, that it was impossible for any solid reconciliation of the Dissenters to the Church to have been made by any concessions that could have been offered. After all the "exceptions" had been considered and replied to by the Bishops' side (replies again replied to by the untiring controversial pens of the opposite party), the result of the Commission was exhibited in the following list of changes to which the Bishops were willing to assent : — The Concessions offered by the Bishoi^s at the Savoy Conference. § 1. We are willing that all the epistles and gospels be used according to the last translation. § 2. That when any thing is read for an epistle which is not in the epistles, the superscriBtion shall be " For the epistle." § 3. That the Psalms be collated with the former translation, mentioned in rubr., and printed according to it. § 4. That the words " this day," both in the collects and prefaces, be used only upon the day itself; and for the following days it be said, "as about this time." § 5. That a longer time be required for signification of the names of the communicants ; and the words of the rubric be changed into these, " at least some time the day before." § G. That the power of keeping scandalous sinners from the communion may be expressed in the rubr. according to the xxvith and xxviith canons ; so the minister be obliged to give an account of the same immediately after to the ordinary. § 7. That the whole preface be prefixed to the commandments. § 8. That the second exhortation be read some Sunday or Holy Day before the celebration of the communion, at the discretion of the minister. § 9. That the general confession at the communion be pronounced by one of the ministers, the people saying after him, all kneeling humbly upon their knees. § 10. That the manner of consecrating the elements be made more explicit and express, and to that purpose these words be put into the rubr., " Then shall he put his hand upon the bread and break it," " then shall he put his hand unto the cupi." § IL That if the font be so placed as the congregation cannot hear, it may be refen-ed to the ordinary to place it more conveniently. § 12. That these words, "yes, they do perform these," etc., may be altered thus: "Because thev promise them both by their sureties," etc. § 13. That the words of the last rubr. before the Catechism may be thus altered, "that children being baptized have all things necessary for their salvation, and dying before they commit any actual sins, be undoubtedly saved, though they be not confirmed." § 14. That to the rubr. after confirmation these words may be added, " or be read}' and desirous to be confirmed." § 15. That these words, " with my body I thee worship," may be altered thus, " with my body I thee honour." § 16. That these words, "till death us depart," be thus altered, "till death us do part." § 17. That the words " sure and certain " may be left out. The Conference being ended, and with so little practical result, the work of Revision was com- mitted to the Convocations of the two Provinces of Canterbury and York. On June 10, IflCl, a Licence from the Crown had been issued to the Archbishop of Canterbury [Juxon], empowering the Convoca- 32 ^n it)i8toncal Jntrooiiction tion of his Province to " debate aud agree ujjou such |Xiiiits as were committed to their charge." ' Another was issued to the Ai'chbishojD of York [Frewen], of a similar tenor, on July 10th [or 23rd]. But little was likely to be done while the Savoy Conference was sitting, beyond preparation for future action. A fresh Licence was issued on October 10th, by which the Convocation of Canterbury was definitely directed to review the Book of Common Prayer and the Ordinal," under the authority of the Commission sent to them on the 10th of June:^ and on November 22nd a similar letter was sent to the Archbishop of York. This letter enjoined the Convocations to review the Prayer Book, and then to present it to " us for our further consideration, allowance, or confirmation." It is probable that much consideration had been given to the subject during the five months that elapsed between the issue of the first Licence and that of the second, as a Form for the 29th of May had been agreed upon, and also the Oifice for Adult Baptism. When, however, the Convocation of Canterbury met on November 21, 1661, "the King's letters were read," and the revision of the Prayer Book was immediately entered upon with vigour and decision."' The LTpper House appointed a Com- mittee, consisting of the following Matthew Wren, Bishop of Ely. Robert Skinner, „ Oxford. John Warner, „ Rochester. Humphry Henchman, ,, Salisbury. George Morley, ., Worcester. Robert Sanderson, ,. Lincoln. William Nicholson, ,, Gloucester. John Cosin, „ Durham. The last named had been invited (with ttie Archbishop of York, aud the Bishops of Carlisle and Chester) to be present and assist at the jDrevious session of the ■ SoiTthern Convocation ; and was now appointed on the Committee as the most learned ritualist among the Bishops. Wren, Warner, and Skinner had been Bishops in the Convocation of 1640.'^ It was necessary that the co-operation of the York Lower House of Convocation should be secured : the Archbishop and three Bishops of that Province, the Bishops of Durham, Carhsle, and Chester, therefore wrote to Dr. Neile, the Prolocixtor of York Convocation, saying that they sat in consultation with the Bishops of the Province of Canterbury, and adding that as the time was very short for the work in hand, it would much facilitate its progress if some Clergy were appointed to act in the Southern Convocation as Proxies for the Northern. Eight such proxies were appointed, three of whom were members of the Lower House of Canterbury Province, the Prolocutor and the Deans of St. Paul's and Westminster, and five of the Lower House of York." The Committee of Bishops met at Ely House ; and Bancroft, at this time Rector of Houghton-le- Spring, Prebendary of Durham, aud Chajilain to Cosin, acted as their Secretary. Bishop Cosin had prepared a folio Prayer Book of 1619, in which he had written down in the margin such alterations as he considered desirable : and this volume, wliich is preserved in the Cosin Library, Durham [D. III. 5], has been thoroughly examined for the present work, all the alterations so made being either referred to or printed in the Notes.^ This volume was evidently used as the basis of their work by the Bishops, although (as will be seen) they did not adopt all the changes proposed by Cosin, and introduced others which are not found in his Prayer Book. They were thus enabled to proceed rapidly with the work of revision, and on November 2.'3rd sent a portion of their labours down to the Lower House, which returned it on the 27th. The whole Prayer Book was completed by December 20, 1661, and a fonn 1 State. Papers, Dom. Charles IT. xliii. October 10. ' Kennett's Jiegisler, p. 503. ' State Papers, Dom. VliarUs II. xliii. October 10. * KENNEn'.S Ileijinter, p. 564. ' The Ijisho]).s returncu to their scats in the House of Ijords on November 20tli, and from that time the junior liishop said Eraycra daily as formerly. The Presbyterian minister had een "excused from attendance" on the House of Commons on October 7, IfiflO. ' Archbishop .luxon, P.isbops Duppa, Piers, and Roberts, had also been Bishops in 1640. Four other Pishops in the Upper House of Ififil, Sheldon, Floyd, ririlTitli, and Ironside, had been in the Lower House in 1G40, and so had about twenty members of the Lower House of 1661. " Kennett's Pei/lnter, pp. 563-56 * A fair copy of this volume, written by Sancroft in a Prayer Book of 1634, is preserved in the Bodleian Library [Arch. Bodl. D. 28], and has been collated with the original for the present work. Cosin had also written three sets of Notes on the Prayer Book ; aud had prepared a fourth, suggesting amendments which be considered to lie necessary, several years before. These are collected in the fifth volume of his Works, ])ublished in the Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology. Some MS. Notes on the Prayer Book, Harl. MS. 7311, arc also said to be his. [See p. 36, note.] to tf)c prajjcr IBook. 33 of Subscription was then agreed upon, of which a copy in Bishop Cosin's handwriting is inserted in his Durham Book, and which is also to be found, with all the names attached, in the Manuscript volume originally annexed to the Act of Uniformity. Meanwhile Parliament was busily engaged in elaborating a new " Act for the Unifonnity of Publick Prayers and Administration of Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies : and for establishing the Form of Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating Bishops, Priests, and Deacons in the Church of England" [1-1 Car. II. c. 4], to which it was necessary to annex a Prayer Book, as in the case of preceding Acts of Uniformity, as the Book to which the Act referred and which was incorporated with it. There is thus not only an Ecclesiastical but a Parliamentary histor}^ of the Prayer Book, extending from June 25, IGGI, to May 19, l(jG2; and it is very worthy of remark that the desire for the statutory restoration of the Church system of Divine Service was so great as to cause considerable impatience on the part of the Commons at the delay which occurred through the Savoy Conference and through the careful deliberation with which Convocation carried on the work of revision. This Parliamentary history of the Prayer Book is, however, of so much interest and importance that the details of it, as they appear on the Journals of the two Houses, must be referred to at some length. On June 25, 1661, the House of Commons ordered, " That a Committee be appointed to view the several laws for confirming the Litiu'gy of the Church of England ; and to make search, whetlier the original book of the Liturgy, annexed to the Act passed in the fifth and sixth years of the reign of King Edward the Sixth, be yet extant ; and to bring in a compendious Bill to supply any defect in the fonner laws ; and to provide for an effectual conformity to the Liturgy of the Church, for the time to come." The Bill was brought in on June 29th, and read a second time on July 3rd, a Prayer Book of 1004 being temporarily annexed to it. When the Bill was committed on the latter day an instruction was given to the Committee, a very large one, that " if the original Book of Common Prayer cannot be found, then to report the said printed book, and their opinion touching the same ; and to send for persons, papers, and records." The search for the original Prayer Book proved fruitless, and when the Bill was read a third time on July 9th, " a Book of Common Prayer, intituled ' The Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of the Sacraments, and other rites and ceremonies of the Church of England,' which was imprinted at London in the year 1604, was, at the clerk's table, annexed to the said Bill, part of the two prayers, inserted therein before the reading psalms being first taken out, and the other part thereof obliterated." On the following day the Bill with the Book annexed w^as sent up to the House of Lords, and was not again sent back to the House of Commons until April 10, 1GG2, the delay being caused by the proceedings of the Savoy Conference and of the Convocation. The Bill was read a first time in the House of Lords as long afterwards as January 14, 1662 ; and on the I7th it was read a second time and committed. A message was brought from the House of Commons on the 28th urging the Lords to expedition, but on February IS, 1662, the Earl of Dorset reported, " That the Committee for the Bill for Uniformity of Worship have met oftentimes, and expected a book of Uniformity to be brought in ; but, that not being done, their Lordships have made no progress therein ; therefore the Committee desires to know the pleasure of the House, whether they shall proceed upon the Book brought from the House of Commons, or stay until the other Book be brought in. LTpon this, the Bishop of London signified to the House, ' That the Book will very shortly be brought in.' " In the Letters Patent, under the authority of which the Convocations were acting, the latter M'ere directed, when they had revised the Prayer Book, to present it to the King " for our further considera- tion, allowance, or confirmation." The revision had been completed on December 20, 1661, and the direction given in the Letters Patent was complied with by sending to the King the fairly written Manuscript copy of the new Prayer Book as it had been subscribed bj' the two Houses of Convocation on that day. It was not to be expected, however, that the King and his Council should collate every l)age of this volume with the Prayer Book formerly in use, and therefore a folio black-letter Prayer Book of 1636 was also sent, in which the changes were carefully entered by Sancroft.' Two tables had also been made, on a separate paper, the one of " Alterations " and the other of " Additions," in which the " Old " text and the " New " text were pvit in parallel columns : at the end of the first table this note being added, " These are all y^ materiall Alterations, y^ rest are onely verball or ye changeing of some Rubricks for ye better performing of ye Service or ye new moulding some of ye Collects." - A Privy Council was then summoned, at which four Bishops were ordered to be present. This met on ' A photozincographed facsimile of tliis volume was "pub- I the Lord CommiBsioners of Her M.ajesty's Treasury," in the lislied for the Royal Commission on Ritual, by .authority of | year 1S71. - Ap p. 3S. C 34 3n !0istorical JntroDuction Febraary 24, 1CC2, the Bishops of London, Durham, Salisbury, Worcester, and Chester being present : " at which time the Book of Common Prayer, with the Amendments and Additions, as it was prepared by the Lords Bishops, was read and approved, and ordered to be transmitted to the House of Peers, with this following recommendation, signed by His Majesty:" — " Charles E. "His majesty having, according to his Declaration of the 25tli of October, 1660, granted his commission under the great seal, to several bishops and other divines, to review the Book of Common Prayer, and to prepare such alterations and additions as they thought fit to offer : afterwards the convocations of the clergy of both the provinces of Canterbury and York were by his majesty called and assembled, and are now sitting. And his Majesty hath been pleased to authorize and require the presidents of the said convocations, and other the bishops and clergy of the same, to review the said Book of Common Prayer, and the book of the form and manner of makin'T and consecrating of bishops, priests, and deacons ; and that, after mature consideration, they should make such additions or alterations in the said books respectively as to them should seem meet and convenient ; and should exhibit and present the same to his majesty in writing, for his majesty's further consideration, allowance, or confirmation. Since which time, upon full and mature dehberation, they the said presidents, bishops, and clerg)- of both provinces, have accordingly reviewed the said books, and have made, exhibited, and presented to his majesty in writing, some alterations, which they think fit to be inserted in the same, and some additional prayers to the said Book of Common Prayer, to be used upon proper and emergent occasions. " All which his majesty having duly considered, doth, with the advice of his council, fully approve and allow the same ; and doth recommend it to the House of Peers, that the said Book of Common Prayer, and of the form of ordination and consecration of bishops, priests, and deacons, with those alterations and additions, be the book which, in and by the intended Act of Uniformity, shall be appointed to be used, by all that ofliciate in all cathedral and collegiate churches and chapels, and in all chapels of colleges and halls in both the universities, and the colleges of Eton and Winchester, and in all parish churches and chapels within the kingdom of England, Dominion of Wales, and town of Berwick-upon-Tweed, and by all that make or consecrate bishops, priests, or deacons, in any of the said places, under such sanctions and penalties as the parliament shall think fit. " Given at our court, at Whitehall, the 24th day of February, 1G61 " [New Style 166'2]. The Journals add, " The book mentioned in his majesty's message was brought into this House ; which is ordered to be referred to the committee for the Act of Unifonuity." Lord Clarendon mentions that the Revised Book, that is, the MS. which the members of Convocation had subscribed, was "confirmed by his Majesty under the Great Seal of England;" and as, being Chancellor at the time, the Seal would have been affixed by his direction, it seems impossible that he should have been mistaken, though no trace of the Great Seal is now to be found in connection with the volume. A few days afterwards, on March 3, 1662, a conciliatory explanation of the delay was given by the King himself to the House of Commons, as is shewn by the following entry in its Journals : — " [The king having commanded the Commons to attend him in the banqueting-house, Whitehall, on Saturday, 1st March, they did so; and the speaker read his majesty's speech to the house, on the following Monday. In the course of it his majesty said : — ] "' Gentlemen, I hear you are very zealous for the church, and very solicitous, and even jealous, that there is not expedition enough used in that affair. I thank you for it, since, I presume, it proceeds from a good root of piety and devotion : but I must tell you I have the worst luck in the world, if, after all the reproaches of being a papist, whilst I was abroad, I am suspected of being a presbyterian now I am come home. I know you will not take it unkindly, if I tell you, that I am as zealous for the church of England, as any of you can be ; and am enough acquainted with the enennes of it, on all sides ; that I am as much in love with the Book of Common Prayer, as you can wish, and have prejudice enough to those that do not love it ; who, I hope, in time will be better informed, and change their nnnds : and you may be confident, I do as much desire to see a unifonuity settled, as any amongst you : I pray, trust me, in that" affair; I promise you to liasten the despatch of it, with all convenient speed ; you may rely up(m me in it. "' I have transmitted the Pjook of Common Prayer, with those alterations and additions which have been pre- sented to me by the Convocation, to the House of Peers with my approbation, that the Act of Uniformity may relate to it : so that I presume it will be shortly despatched there ; and when we liave done all we can, the well settling that affair will require great prudence and discretion, and the absence of all passion and precipitation.' " Parliament now proceeded to the completion of the Act of Unifonnity without any further delay. The Lords' Committee reported to the House on March 13, 1662, and on that and th(> following two days the " alterations and additions " were read ;^ " which being ended, the Lord Chancellor, in the name, and by the directions of the House, gave the Lords and Bishops thanks, for tlicir care in this ' In the original rough Minutes of proceedings taken by the Clerks it is stated that "after debate it was resolved that the amendments and alter.itions in the printed book should be read, which was this day begun accordingly, and so the Preface was read." This shews the purpose for which the "printed book" sent with the "fairly written" MS. was )U'i'parod. Both books arc mentioned subsequeutly as being sent down to the House of Commons. to tf)C Ipraycc IBook. JO business ; and dusired their Lordships to give the like thanks, from this House, to the other House of Convocation, for their pains herein." On the 17th the " House took into consideration the Bill concerning XTniformity iu Public Worship, formerly reported from the committee. And, upon the second reading of the alterations and provisos, and considerations thereof, it is ordered, that this House agrees to the preamble, as it is now brought in by the committee. And the question being put, ' Whether this book that hath been transmitted to this House from the King shall be the book to which the Act of Uniformity shall relate ? ' it was resolved in the affirmative." After the Act had been carefully considered clause by clause, it was read a third time and passed on April 9, 1062, and before holding a conference with the Commons on the following day "the House directed that the Book of Common Prayers, recommended from the King, shall be delivered to the House of Commons, as that being the Book to which the Act of Uniformity is to relate ; and also to deliver the book wherein the alterations are made, out of which the other Book was fairly written ; and likewise to communicate to them the King's message, recommending the said book ; and lastly, to let the Commons know, ' That the Lords, upon consideration had of the Act of Uniformity, have thought fit to make some alterations, and add certain provisos, to which the concui-rence of the House of Commons is desired.' " The "book wherein the alterations are made "was the black-letter Prayer Book of 1536, which has already been mentioned ; " the other book " which had been " fairly written " out of it was the Manuscript \olume to which the members of Convocation had appended their subscriptions, and which was afterwards "joined and annexed" to the Act of Uniformity: both volumes being still preserved in the House of Lords.^ On April 11, 1662, the Act of Unitormity was again in the House of Commons, and on the 14th " the amendments in ' The Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church of England,' sent from the Lords ; the transcript of which Book, so amended, therewith sent, they desire to be added to the Bill of Uniformity, instead of the book sent up therewith, was, in part, read." The reading was finished the same afternoon, and on the following day a Committee was appointed " to compare the Books ^ of Common Prayer, sent down from the Lords, with the book sent up from this House ; and to see whether they differ in anything besides the amendments, sent from the Lords, and already read in this House, and wherein ; and to make their report therein, with all the speed they can. And, for that purpose, they are to meet this afternoon, at two of the clock, in the Speaker's chamber." The Committee sat late and early, and reported to the House on the afternoon of the 16th. receiving the special thanks of the House for their exijedition. The question was then put, " Whether debate shall be admitted to the amendments made by the Convocation in the Book of Common Prayer, and sent down by the Lords to this House ? " when ninety members voted for and ninety-six against a debate. Afterwards the question was put, " That the amendments made by the Convocation, and sent down by the Lords to this House, might, by the order of this House, have been debated, and it was resolved in the affirmative." ^ Much further debate took place on the many clauses of the Act of Uniformity, and on the various amendments made or proposed, but the only other incident specially connected with the Prayer Book itself was the formal correction of a clerical error, which is thus recorded in the Journals of the House of Lords on May 8, 1662 :— " Whereas it was signified by the House of Commons, at the conference yesterday, ' That they found one mistake in the rubric of baptism, which they conceivefl was a mistake of the writer, " persons " being put instead of " children :'" ' Both these vohimes were practically lost sight of for i for the Convocation, " it was ordered that those members who forty or fifty years, but were discovered iu 1867 to have been I managed the Conference with the Lords should intimate the all the while iu safe custody, first on a shelf in the chamber ! desire of the House. This was done, and the following entry where the original Acts of Parliament were preserved, aud ' appears in the .Journals of tlie House of Lords on May 8th : — afterwards iu the Library of the House of Lords. ! " Whereas it was intimated at the conference yesterdaj', - That is, the black-letter folio with M.S. corrections and i as the desire of the House of Commons, ' That it be recom- the fairly written MS. * Tlie constitutional respect of the two Houses for Convo- cation is strongly illustrated by an incident which occurred on one of these days. A strong desire had been expressed in the House of Commons that a proviso should be introduced into the Act of Uniformity " for beini; uncovered and for using reverent gestures at the time of iUvme Service. " This proviso was twice read, "but the matter being held proper mended to the Convocation, to take order for reverend and uniform gestures and demeanors to be enjoined at the time of divine service and preaching : ' " It is ordered liy this House, aud hereby recommended to the Lords, the Bishops, and the rest of the Convocation of the Clergy, to prepare some canon or rule for that pur- pose, to be humbly presented unto his majesty for his assent." 36 an l^istorical ^ntroDiiction " The Lord Bishop of Durham acquaintud the House, that himself, and the Lord Bishop of St. Asaph, aud the Lord Bishop of Carlile, had authority from the Convocation to mend the said word, averring it was only a mistake of the scribe. And accordingly they came to the clerk's table, and amended the same."* The amendments proposed by the House of Commons in the Act of Uniformity all tended to raise the tone in which the Prayer Book was to be used, and to make the provisions of the Act more strict. They especially required, as has already been mentioned, that the Surplice, and the Sign of the Cross in Baptism, should continue to be used. These amendments were all agreed to by the Lords on May 10th ; and thus the Prayer Book, as amended by Convocation, and the Act of Uniformity, as amended by Parliament, both received the Royal Assent on May 19, 1(J(J2. In answer to inquiries from the House of Lords, the Bishops had guaranteed (on April 21stj that the Book should be in print and ready for use on August 24th, the Feast of St. Bartholomew, which was the day fixed by Parliament for the Act to come into operation. The printing was done in London by Bill and Barker, the King's Printers, and under the superintendence of Convocation, which, as early as March 8th, had appointed Dr. Sancroft to be Supervisor, and Messrs. Scattergood and Dillingham, Correctors of the press.- The following MS. entry on the fly-leaf of Bishop Cosin's Durham Book, in the Bishop's own hand, will shew how much anxious thought lie had taken for this and all other matters connected with the Revision of the Prayer Book :^ — " Directions to be given to the printer. " Set a fair Fronti.spiece at the beginning of the Book, and another before the Psalter, to be designed as the Archbishop shall direct, and after to be cut in Brass." [A proof copy of this is preserved in the same volume.] " Page the whole Book. " Add nothing. Leave out nothing. Alter nothing, in what Volume soever it be printed. Particularly ; never cut off the Lord's Prayer, Creed, or any Collect with an etc. ; but wheresoever tliey are to he used, print them out at hirge, and add [Amen] to the end of every prayer. "Never print the Lord's Prayer beyond — 'deliver us from evil. Amen.' " Print the Creed.s always in three paragraphs, relating to the three Persons, etc. •■ Print nut Capital letters witli profane pictures in tliem. "In all the Epistles and Gospels follow the new translation." [They are so written in the JIS. annexed to the Act of Uniformity.] " Aa much as may be, compose so that the leaf be not to be turned over in any Collect, Creed, Verse of a Psalm, Middle of a sentence, etc. " Set not your own Names in the Title-page nor elsewhere in the Book, but only ' Printed at London by the printers to the King's most excellent Majesty. Such a year.'" [These names were erased from the Sealed Books.] " Print [Glory be to the Father, etc.] at the end of every Psalm, and of every part of cxix. Psalm. " In this Book :— " Where a line is drawn through the words, that is all to be left out. " Where a line is drawn under the words, it is to be printed in the Roman letter. " Where a jirickt line is drawn under the words, it is not part of the hook, but only a direction to the printer or reader. ' This correction was made both iu the black-letter copy and in tlie manuscript, where it is still to be seen. An order for making it had passed Convocation on April 24th. [KEXN'ETT's Reiji.iter, p. 6fa'G. ] A more curious slip of the pen is said to have been corrected with a bold readiness by Lord Clarendon. "Archbishop Tenison told me by his bedside on Monday, Feb. 12, 1710, manuscript. If it ever existed it was probably in the copy prepared for the printers, of which nothing is now known. - Among Archbishop Sancroft's MSS. in the Bodleian, there is a letter from one of Bishop Cosin's chaplains, written from Bishop Auckland on June 16, 1G(>2, in which he says, "My lonl desires at all times to know particularly what pro- that the Couvocation book intended to be the copy conlirmed gress )ou make in the Common I'rayer. " There is also by the Act of Unifnrmity had a rash blunder in the rubrick ' mandate from Charles II. to the Dean and Chapter of Durham after Baptism, which should h.avc run [It is Cfrliiiii hi/ dndx | among the State P.apers, dated .Tune Ki, 1()62, likewise, and word, that chiUh'pn iDltieJi are bnpihi'd (/f/iii'j before they commit I ordering them tu dispense with l*rebendary .Sancroft's artual sin are toiiloubtedli/ tinved]. But tlio wunls [which are residence, as he "has been for some months, and still is baptized] were left out, till .Sir Cyril Wyche coming to see attending the impression of tlie Liturgy;" aiul adding that the Lord Chancellor Hydo found the book brought Imme by , " it is not the moaning of the statutes to require the residence his lordship, and lying in his parlour window, even after it ' of members of tlie Chapter when service of greater use to the had p,as.sed the two houses, and happening to cast his eye i Church requires them." [.S'/. Iti.ll] of the Holy Bible ; the printers being heavily fined for the mistake. But there It is very singular that Burton had alleged, in his Tryall of I'riralc Devotions, tliat there was "in tlu! great printing house .at Lond intercessions [eVret'^eiy], and Eucharists [evxa-pia-Tiai], be made for all men " [1 TiM. ii. 1], — these shew that an orderly and formal system was already in existence ; while his allusion to " the traditions " [tu9 -TrapaooTei^], seems to point to a system derived from some source the authority of which was binding upon the Church. [See also Introd. to Liturgy.] Such an authority would attach to every word of our Blessed Lord ; and when we know that He remained on earth for forty days after His Resun-ection, and that during that period He was instructing His Apostles in " the things pertaining to the Kingdom of God " [Acts i. .3], it is most natural to suppose that the main points of Christian ritual were ordained by Him, as those of the Jewish ritual had been ordained during the forty days' sojourn of Moses on Sinai. It is to be remembered also that there are forms and ceremonies in use by the Church which were undoubtedly ordained by Christ, such as the laying on of hands in Ordination, the use of water and certain words in Holy Baptism, and the manual ceremonies at the Holy Communion. At a later period, when the Temple service had nearly or quite come to an end, when the tem- porary dispensation of a miraculous Apostolate was drawing to a close, and when the Church was settling into its permanent form and habits, St. John (the last and most comprehensive of the Apostolic guides of the Church) wrote the Book of the Revelation ; and several portions of it seem intended to set forth in mystical language the principles of such ceremonial worship as was to be used in the Divine Service of Christian churches. In the fourth chapter, the Apostle is taken up to be shewn, as Moses had been shown, a " pattern in the Mount ; " and as that revelation to Moses began to be made on the Sabbath of the Old Dispensation, so it was " the Lord's Day " on which St. John was " in the Spirit," that ho might have this new revelation made to him. As, moreover, the revela- tion made to Moses was one respecting the ritual of the Jewish system, so there is an unmistakeable ritual character about the vision first seen by St. John ; the whole of the fourth and fifth chapters describing a scene which bears a close resemblance to the celebration of the Holy Eucharist, as it was celebrated in the early ages of the Church, and as it is still celebrated in the East. The form and arrangement of churches in primitixe times was derived, in its main features, from the Temple at Jerusalem. Beyond the porch was the narthex, answering to the court of the Gentiles, and api^ropriated to the unbaptized and to penitents. Beyond the narthex was the nave, answering to the court of the Jews, and appropriated to the body of worshippers. At the upper end of the nave was the choir, answering to the Holy Place, for all who were ministerially engaged in Divine Service. Beyond the choir was the Bema or Chancel, answering to the Holy of Holies, used only for the celebration of the Holy Eucharist, and separated from the choir by a closed screen, resembling the organ screen of our cathedrals, which was called the Iconostasis. As early as the time of Gregory Nazianzen, in the fourth century, this screen is compared to the division between the present and the eternal world [Carra. xi.], and the sanctuary behind it was ever regarded with the greatest reverence as the most sacred place to which mortal man could have access. " When," said St. Chrysostom in one of his sermons, " thou beholdest the curtains drawn up, then imagine that the heavens are let down from above, and that the Angels are descending." [Chrys. in E^ih. Hom. iii.] The veiled door which formed the only direct exit from it into the choir and nave was only opened at the time when the Blessed Sacrament was administered to the people there assembled, and thus the opening of this door brought into view the Altar and the Divine mysteries which were being celebrated there. And when St. John looked through the door that had been opened in Heaven, what he saw is thus described : " And behold a Throne was set in Heaven, . . . and round about the throne were four and twenty seats ; and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment ; and they had on their heads crowns of gold : . . . and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the Throne, . . . and before the Throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal." Here is exactly represented an arrangement of the altar familiar to the whole Eastern Church, to the early Church of England, and to the Churches of Italy, France, and Germany at the present day, in which it occupies the centre of an apse in front of the seats of the Bishop and Clergy, the latter being placed in the curved part of the wall. And, although there is no reason to think that the font ever stood near the altar, yet nothing apjjears more likely than that the " sea of glass like unto crystal " mystically represents that laver of regeneration through which alone the altar can be spiritually approached.^ Another striking characteristic of the ancient Church ' Neale says that reservoirs to supply water for use in Divine Service are sometimes found in the eastern part of Oriental churches. [Neale's Introd. to Holy East. Cli. p. ISO.] In his Additions and Corrections he also says, "There is a veil open rather in front of the place where the altar once stood in tlie Cluirch of St. Irene in the Seraglio at C'onstan- 48 a Eitual 3lntroDuction was the extreme reverence which was shewn to the book of the Gospels, which was always placed upon the altar and surmounted by a cross. So " in the midst of the Throne, and round about the Throne," St- John saw those four living creatures which have been universally interpreted to represent the four Evangelists or the four Gospels ; their position seeming to signify that the Gospel is ever attendant upon the altar, penetrating, pervading, and embracing the highest mystery of Divine Worship, giving " glory and honour and thanks to Him that sat on the throne, Who liveth for ever and ever." In the succeed- ing chapter St. John beholds Him for Whom this altar is prepared. " I beheld, and lo, in the midst of the Throne, and of the four living creatures, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as It had been slain, having se^en horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God sent forth into all the earth." It cannot be doubted that this is our Blessed Lord in that Human Nature on which the septifoi^nis gratia was jjoured without measure ; and that His appearance in the form of " the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing," represents the mystery of His prevailing Sacrifice and continual Intercession. But around this living Sacrifice there is gathered all the homage of an elaborate ritual. They who worship Him have " every one of them haips," to offer Him the praise of instntmental music ; they have " golden vials full of incense, which are the prayers of saints," even as the angel afterwards had " given unto him much incense that he should offer it with the prayers of the saints upon the golden altar which was before the Throne: "^ they sing a new song, mingling the praises of " the best member that they have " with that of their instrumental music ; and they fall down before the Lamb with the lowliest gesture of their bodies in humble adoration. Let it also be remembered that one of the Anthems here sung by the choirs of Heaven is that sacred song, " Holy, Holy, Hoi}', Lord God Almighty, Which was, and is, and is to come," the Eucharistic use of which is traceable in every age of the Church. These striking coincidences between the worship of Heaven revealed to St. John and that which was and is offered at the altars of the Church on earth, warrant us in considering this portion of the Revelation as a Di\ine treasury wherefrom we may draw the principles upon which the worship of earth ought to be organized and conducted. And the central point of the principles thus revealed is that there is a Person to be adored in every act of Di-\dne Worship now, as there was a Person to be adored in the system which culminated in the Temple Ser\ice. This Person is moreover revealed to us as present before the worshippers. And He is ftirther represented as our Redeeming Lord, the " Lamb that was slain," He Who said respecting Himself to St. John at the opening of the Apocalj-ptic Vision, " I am He that liveth and was dead, and am alive for evermore." This Presence was promised by our Blessed Lord in words which the daily prayer of the Church interprets to have been spoken with reference not only to Apostolic or Episcopal councils, but also to Di\-ine Service : " Where two or three are gathered together in My Name, there am I in the midst of them " [Matt, xviii. 20]. It is quite impossible to view this promise in the light of Holy Scripture, and especially of that part of the Revelation which has been referred to above, without seeing that its fullest and most essential meaning connects it with the Eucharistic Presence of Christ, the "Lamb as it had been slain." This truth so pervaded the mind of the ancient Church that in its primitive ages Divine Service consisted of the Holy Eucharist only ; - and the early Liturgies speak to Christ in such terms as indicate the most simple and untroubled Faith in the actual Presence of our " Master " and Lord.'* Hence the Ceremonial Worship of the early Church was essentially connected with this Divine Service ; and to those who were so imbued with a belief in the Eucharistic Presence of their Lord the object of such ceremonial was self-evident. The idea of reflex action tipon the worshipper probably never occurred to Christians in those times. Their one idea was that of doing honour to Christ, after the pattern of the four living creatures, the four and twenty ciders, the angels, and the ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands who said " Worthy is the Lamb : " after the pattern of those who, even in Heaven, accompanied their anthems with the music of harps, and their prayers with the .sweet odour of incense. The mystery of our Lord's Presence as the Object of Divine Worship lies at the root of all the tinople. This church," he addfi, "is a splendid specimen of I part of Christian worship. The "hours of pr.-iyer," now Byzantine architecture, and contains three or four rows in the ! represented by our Mattins and Evensong, were derived synthronus of the magniticent apse." ' from tlie .lewish ritual; and the Christians of Jerusalem ' It is ohaervahle that the incense is not a symbolical evidently " went up tu " those of the Temple Service while it figure for prayer, but is said to be offered in combination lasted, with prayer. [Rev. viii. .3, 4.] 1 " >SVc a prayer "for the King, "from the Liturgy of St. Marie, - The Holy Kucharist was the only distinctively Christian I but addresaed to the First Terson of tlie Hlesscd Trinity. to tbt Prater iBook. 49 ceremonial practices of the Church : and a conviction that this Presence is vouchsafed chiefly through the Holy Eucharist causes the latter to become the visible centre from which all ritual forms and cere- monies radiate. It is true that there are some ceremonies which may be said to belong to the organiza- tion of Divine Service ; but even that organization is linked on to acts of worship, since it is in the service of God, Who enjoins order, and exhibits it in all His works. But this latter class of ceremonies is not large, and scarcely affects the general principle which has been previously stated. There are, again, some ceremonies which may be called educational or emotional in their purpose, but they are so only in a secondary degree ; and such a character may be considered as accidentally rather than essen- tially belonging to them. The principles of Ceremonial Worship thus deduced from Holy Scripture may be shortly applied to some of the more prominent particulars of the ritual of the Church of England, leaving exact details for the two subsequent sections of this Introduction, and the Notes throughout the work. 1. The local habitation provided for the welcome of our Lord's mystical Presence is provided of a character becoming the great honour and blessing which is to be vouchsafed. It is the House of God, not man's house ; a place wherein to meet Him with the closest approach which can be made in this life. Hence, if Jacob consecrated with the ceremony of vmction the place where God made His cove- nant with him, and said of it, " This is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven ; " so should our churches be set apart and consecrated with sacred ceremonies making them holy to the Lord. So also, because they are to be in reality, and not by a mere stretch of language, the Presence chambers of our Lord, we must regard them as the nearest to heaven in holiness of all places on earth by the virtue of that Presence. And, lavishing all costly material, and all earnest skill upon their first erection and decoration, we shall ever after frequent them with a consciousness that " the Lord is in His holy Temple," and that all which is done there should be done under a sense of the greatest reverence towards Him. 2. Hence too, the furniture of the House of God, the utensils or instrumenta necessary for Divine Service, should all be constructed with a reverent regard to the Person in Whose service they are to be used. Costly wood or marble, precious metals and jewels, used for such an object, do not minister to luxury, and have no direct and primary reference at all to those who will use them or look ujDon them. But as ministering to the honour of Christ our Lord they cannot be too freely used : nor need we ever fear of expending wealth or skill too abundantly when we read of the manner in which God accepted all that Solomon had done for His holy Temple at Jerusalem, and all the beauty and splendour with which He is worshipped in Heaven. The same principle applies with equal force to the apparel in which the ministers of God carry on His Divine Worship ; surplice and albe, cope and vestment, all being used in His honour, and for no other primary object whatever. If they are not necessary for the honour of God, the greater part of them are not needed at all. 3. The use of instrumental music, of singing, and of musical intonation, instead of colloquial modes of speech, are all to be explained on the same ground. Universal instinct teaches that the praises of God ought to be sung, and that singing is the highest mode of using in His service the organs of speech which He has given us. An oi-derly musical intonation is used by priest and people in their prayers, that they may speak to their Maker otherwise than they would speak to their fellow-men, acknowledging even by their tone of voice that He is to be served with reverence, ceremony, and awe. 4. And, lastly, the gestures used in Divine Service are used on similar principles. Kneeling in prayer, standing to sing praise, turning towards the East or the Altar when saying the Creeds, using the Sign of the Cross, humbly bowing the head at the Name of Jesus or of the Blessed Trinity,' — these are all significant gestures of reverence towards One Who is really and truly present to accept the ' "When I enter a place of common prayer, as y^ choir of a collegiate church or the body of a parisli church or chapel, I worship God by humbly bowing of my body towards His holy altar, where I have often expei"ienced His most gracious and glorious presence, beseeching Him to bless and succeed me and my brethren in our joint and faithful devotion. In like manner, prayers being ended, I again worship in mind and body His eternal and only adorable Majesty, and render Him humble and cordial th.inks for the assistance of His Holy Spirit in all bounden and public service througli Jesus Christ our Lord. Hallelujah. I likewise lo«ly adore as often as I approach the board of our Lord beseeching His special aid, and grace on my self and whole congregation for the worthy and profitable performance of the Communion Office, the most solemn service of the Church. This humilia- tion of my body and mind is due in public and in private for me a vile and miserable sinner to tlie Eternal, most holy, most worthy, and most glorious and most merciful Maker and Preserver of me and all mankind : Whom I can never too much, never enough adore, magnify, praise, serve, and honour. God accept me and my brethren. God forgive us our irreligion, our hasty, careless, cheap, indecent, and imperfect devotion." [Dr. Bernard's MS. Annotat. on Common Prayer, Bodl. Lib. D. 24.] Fuller notices that although Foxe was "no friend to the cere- monies," yet "he never entered any church without ex- pressing solemn reverence therein." [Fuller's Ch. Hist. ii. 475, ed. 1837.] 50 3 IRitual 3lntronuction ■worship which they offer ; One Who accepts such rcveience from the holy Angels and the glorified Saints, and Who ^vill not be otherwise than willing to receive it from His ministers and members in the Church on earth. These, then, are the principles of Ceremonial Worship which pervade the Book of Common Prayer ; and for the practical expression of which provision is made in the rubrics and in the ritual tradition to which the rabrics directly or indirectly point. They are principles which were originally laid down with the most awftil solemnity by God Himself; which were not abrogated by any act or word of our Lord when He was upon earth ; which were illustrated afresh on the first formation of the Christian Church in as solemn a manner as that in which they were originally enunciated ; which were practically adopted by those Christians who lived nearest to the time of our Lord's ministry and teaching ; and which have been followed out in our own Church from the most ancient days. The particular manner iu which these Divinely revealed principles of Ceremonial Worship are practically applied to Divine Service as regulated by the present rules of the Church of England will be shewn in the following sections. SECTION II. THE MUSICAL PERFORMANCE OF DIVINE SERVICE. The performance of Divine Service may be regarded in a twofold relation ; as it affects the eye, and as it affects the ear. In other words, it may be considered as coming within the province, and under the superintendence of, one or other of the two representative Church officers, the Sacrist, who has charge of the Altar, Vestments, and other " Ornaments " of the Church and Ministers ; and the Precentor, who is the " Chief Singer " of the Church, and whose duty it is to regulate and conduct Divine Service iu its musical aspect. It is with the latter that this Section will deal : and in doing so it must be observed by way of introduction that although the directions of the Prayer Book respecting the musical performance of Divine Service are but few, they imply much more than they express ; such a word as Eyensovg, or such brief injunctions as " here foUoweth the anthem ;" " then shall be said, or sung;" "here shall follow;" "then shall be read;" "here the Priest and Clerks shall say;" " these Anthems shall be sung or said ;" with many others, containing references to established practices, and requiring to be elucidated by historical explanations. Before commenting upon the musical directions of the Prayer Book, it will be desirable, however, to say a few words respecting the ultimate foundation on which they rest ; that is, respecting the Divine authority for the employment of instrumental and vocal music in the worship of God. For this we must go to Sacred History. The earlier portions of that History may be passed over, as the notices of any definite and settled Ritual in Patriarchal times are but slight. We may pass over also the sojourn of the Chosen People in Egypt, their wanderings in the desert, and the unsettled period of their history in the Promised Land. " In Egypt," writes Hooker, " it may be God's people were right glad to take some comer of a poor cottage, and there serve God upon their knees ; peradventure, covered with dust and straw some- times. ... In the Desert, they are no sooner possessed of some little thing of their own, but a Tabernacle is required at their hands. Being planted in the laud of Canaan, and having David to be their King, when the Lord had given him rest, it grieved liis righteous mind to consider the growth of his own estate and dignity, the affairs of Religion continuing still in the former manner. What he did propose it was the pleasure of God that Solomon his son should perform ; and perform in a manner suitable to their i^resent, not to their ancient state and condition," etc. [Eccl. Pol. IV. ii. 4.] We must, therefore, look to the Davidic period of Sacred History as the cariiest age in which the Church wa-s able, through its outward circumstances, to give that full ritualistic form and expression to its worship which has ever since been so conspicuous a feature of it whether in the Temple or the Church. The first great religious celebrations in David's reign took place in connection with the removal of the Ark from its place of banishment (after it had been ca]>turod by the Philistines in the time of Eli) to its resting-place on Mount Sion. There were two grand Choral Processional Services in connection with this removal. The former of these, in consequence of certain ritual irregularities to tfje prapet TBook. 51 which displeased God, came to a sad and untimely close [1 Chron. xiii. S-12 ; xv. 11-10]. The latter is the one which, as meeting with God's express approbation, especially demands our notice. It is iu reference, then, to this second and successful ceremonial, that we read of David, by God's appointment, " speaking to the chief of the Levites to appoint their brethren to be the singers with instruments of musick, psalteries and harps and cymbals, sounding, by lifting up the voice with joy." " Thus all Israel " — the narrative proceeds — " brought up the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord with shouting, and with sound of the cornet, and with trumpets, and with cymbals, making a noise with psalteries and harps " [1 Chron. xv. 28]. Nor was the work of Praise at an end. So soon as the solemn business of translating the Ark was over there was a special festival of Thanksgiving in commemoration of the auspicious event, and provision was also made for a continuous service of Praise. Hence David " appointed certain of the Levites to minister before the Ark of the Lord, and to record, and to thank and praise the Lord God of Israel;" some "with psalteries and haqK;" some to make "a sound with cymbals ;" besides " the priests with tnimpets continually before the Ark of the Covenant of God." Then it was that " David delivered first this Psalm to thank the Lord [Ps. cv.] into the hand of Asaph and his brethren : ' Give thanks unto the Lord ; call upon His Name. . . . Sing unto Him, sing Psalms unto Him. . . . Sing unto the Lord, all the earth : shew forth from day to day His Salva- tion.'" And that the words of this Song should be jjractically realized, and the offering of Praise not cease with the festive occasion which had drawn forth the Psalm, we read of " Asaph and his brethren " being " left before the Ark of the Covenant to minister continually ;" of " Heman and Jeduthun," and others, " who were expressed by name," " being chosen to give thanks to the Lord, with trumpets and cjTubals, . . . and with inusical instruments of God" [1 Chron. xvi. 37, 41, 42] ; of a great company of Levites being set by David " over the Service of Song in the House of the Lord, after the Ark had rest," who " ministered before the dwelling-place of the Tabernacle of the Congregation with singuig " [1 Chron. vi. 31, 32] ; and of "the singers, chief of the fathers of the Levites, . . . who were employed in that work day and night " [1 Chron. ix. 33]. So highly develoj^ed, indeed, did the musical department of the Divine Service become, that we find David, later in life, enumerating no fewer than " four thousand, who praised the Lord with the instruments which I made to praise therewith " [1 Chron. xxiii. 5]. And lest we should deem these and kindred ritual arrangements of " the man after God's own heart," " the sweet Psalmist of Israel," to be mere private unauthorized exhibitions of strong musical and aesthetic taste on the part of an individual monarch, we are expressly told in one place, that " all these things were done according to . . . the commandment of The Lord by His Prophets " [2 Chron. xxix. 25]. Solomon carefully perpetuated all the musical arrangements of his father, and after the completion of his glorious Temple, according to the pattern shewn him by God Himself, he transferred thither all the " instruments " which David had made for God's service ; and there is abundant evidence in the magnificent ceremonial of the Temple Dedication, as well as in the account of his regulations for the subsequent maintenance of its Services, that he firmly established there an elaborate system of instru- mental and vocal ritual. As to subsequent monarchs, in proportion as they neglected God, in that proportion did they cease to care for the Ritual of His House, and suffered the music of His Sanctuary to decline. And conversely, as any monarch was mindftil of the Lord of Hosts, and zealous for His honour, so do we ever see one token of his zeal and devotion in his reverent attention to the Ritual and the Music of God's Holy Temjile- Of Joash, of Hezekiah, of Josiah, the Holy Ghost recounts with special approbation their efforts for the restoration and encouragement of Church Music. When times grew darker, and when God's people fell away from Him, then they forgat that " God was their Strength, and the High God their Redeemer." Then followed the sad era of the Captivity when the harjjs of Sion were hung on Babel's willows. On the return from the Captivity we read of laudable and energetic attempts on the part of Ezra and Nchemiah to restore the ancient choral worship, and with a certain amount of success : but it may be doubted whether the services of the later Temple ever reached so high a standard as that which characterized them in the Temple of Solomon. From this brief survey we learn that God's Church is emphatically " a singing Church ;" that music, vocal and instrumental, is designed, by His express appointment, to constitute one essential element, one necessary feature, one integral part, of His public Ritual ; that the absence of music and suitable ceremonial in the history of His ancient Church, is, in every case, not the result of His Will, but of man's sinful disregard of that Will ; an infallible sign, not of the faithfulness, but of the unfaith- fulness of His people. Nor has Christianity introduced any change in this respect. At no time and in no manner has 52 a IRitual JntroDuction God ever given any word or sign to shew that He lias altered His Will on this subject. Our Blessed Lord is not recorded to have said a word in disparagement of the general principle of Ceremonial Wor- ship, or of the ancient Ritual, or Music, of God's Church. It was one of His chief earthly delights to take part in that worship Himself: and an elaborately Ceremonial Worship was the only public w^orship which He attended while sojourning here below. He was first discovered in His youth in His Father's Temple. His first-recorded words are, " W^ist ye not that I must be ev roli rod Uar/ao? yuoi/ ;" words which " remind the earthly mother that it was in the courts of His Heavenly Father's House that the Son must needs be found ; that His tnie home was in the Temple of Him Whose glories still lingered round the heights of Moriah."^ Do we not see Him here and elsewhere expressing in deed that which of old He expressed in v:ord by the mouth of His " Sweet Singer," — " Lord, I have loved the Habitation of Thy House. . . . My soul hath a desire and longing to outer into the Courts of my God"? And even after the Ascension, while we read of our Lord's chosen ones meeting together for their private celebrations of the Blessed Eucharist in their own consecrated Oi-atory,^ " the large Upper Room " (that sacred spot, hallowed first by the visible Presence of Christ, and then by the descent of the Holy Ghost), we find them exhibiting the effect of their Master's reverent example and teaching, by "continuing," none the less, "daily, vith one accord, in the Temple" for t\\e inihlic worship of God. Our Lord came, not to abolish, but to transfigure the old Ritual ; not to diminish, but to increase its glory ; to breathe into its dead forms a Divine and Life-gi^^ng Energy. Christian worship, at its first introduction, was not designed to supplant, but to supplement, the ancient Ritual. It was pro- bably simple in outward character, as being only 'private ; God's public worship being still intrusted to, and conducted b}^ the Ministers of the Old Dispensation. For a whole generation, the two went on simultaneously ; the public worshij) of the Old, the jDrivate worship of the New Dispensation. The two were ultimately to be fused together : the outward and expressive forms of the Old, adapted, under the guidance of the Holy Ghost, to clothe the august realities of the New. It is plainly recorded when and ivhere the first Christian Service took place ; viz. on the eve of our Lord's Passion, and in " the large Upper Room " — hereafter to become the first Oratory of the Chris- tian Church. Though outwardly, it may be, without pomp and show, as bearing on it the shadow of the great Humiliation to be consummated on the morrow, yet has the world never beheld, before or since, a Service of such surpassing dignity, sacredness, and significance. Here we witness the meeting-point of two Dispensations ; the virtual passing away of the Law, and its transfiguration into the Gospel ; the solemn Paschal close of the Old Economy, the Holy Eucharistic Inauguration of the New. Here we see the whole Representative Church assembled together with its Divine Head. And here we find every essential element of Christian Worship introduced and blessed by Incarnate God Himself. The grand central feature of the Service is the Holy Eucharist. Clustering round, and subsidiary to it, we find supplication, intercession, exhortation, benediction, excommunication, and Holy Psalmody : " after they had sung (v/xvi'ia-avTe^), they went out to the Mount of Olives." Here, in the solemn Eucharistic Anthem which accompanied the first Celebration ; — the Celebrant, God Incarnate, " giving Himself with His own Hands ;" and the Leader of the Holy Choir, God Incarnate, fulfilling His own gracious prediction, " In the midst of the Church will I sing praise unto Thee " {vfivi'iaco ae) — do we behold the Divine Source of that bright and ever-flowing stream of " Psalms and Hymns, and Spiritual Songs," which was to " make glad the City of God." In this august and archetypal Service, then, we sec all those venerable essentials of Christian Worship which it would afterwards devolve upon the Church, under the guidance of the indwelling Spirit, to embody and express in her solemn Liturgies ; and lor the clothing and reverent performance and administration of which it would be needful for her, under the same Holy Teaching, to borrow and adapt from that Divine Storehouse of Ritual which God had provided in the ancient Ceremonial. ' Ellicott's Historical Lectures on the Life of our Lord, p. 03, Ist ed. ' The English version, "breaking bread from house to house" [Acts ii. 40], would load us to imagine, if it suggested the Kuc'harist at all, that this solemn lircaking of the Bread of Life — that "Bread which is the Communion of the Body of Christ " — took place irregularly, now in one private house, now in another. This is not, however, the meaning. Kot' bIkov is not .it (tiiy house, but "at home," at one particuhir house, or home. And the then Home of the Infant Church was that Sacred Place whore the Ifoly Ghost hail descended. "filling the whole House where they were sitting;" — the "Large Upper Room," where the first Kucharist had been celebrated, where our Lonl had appeared on two consecutive Sundays — " l!ic Ujipcr Kooni " (t6 vvfpifov, AcT.s i. 13], to which our Lord's chosen servants resorted after the Ascension in obedience to His command tliat they should not depart from .lerusalom, but wait there for His Promised (iift, and "where .abode Peter, and .lames, and John, and Anitrew, Philip," with the rest, who "all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the ^^()men, and Mary the Mother of .Tesus, and with His brethren." to t()c ipraper T5oofe. 53 But the chief point for us, at present, is this ; that in the "Hymn" of our Ever- Blessed Redeemer we meet with a neiv, and, if possible, more constraining warrant for the use of Music in Divine Worship. We learn that the " Service of Song," ordained of old by God for His Church, and commended by so many marks of His approval, so far from being discountenanced by our Lord, was deliberately sanctioned, appropriated, perpetuated, re-consecrated, by His own most blessed practice and example. Music was henceforth, no less than of old, to form one essential element in Divine Worship. Nor must we fail to notice that, as music was doubtless intended to find its approjjriate place throughout the entire offices of the Christian Church, even as the threefold division of Church Music into " Psalms, and Hymns, and Spiritual Songs," ' twice emphatically repeated by the Holy Ghost, would seem to indicate, so its apecial home is the Liturgy. Wherever absent, it should not be absent there : and the iraniediate juxta- position of the Words of Institution, in both Gospels, with the mention of the Hymns, may be reve- rently conceived to teach this. So also does the Church seem instinctively to have felt : regarding the Holy Eucharist as the great centre round which her songs of praise should cluster and revolve ; the great source from which they should take their rise, and flow forth. Pliny's mention of the early morning meetings of the first Christians to offer Divine Worship and sing hymns to Christ, probably refers to their Eucharistic assemblies. And Justin Martyr's expression must have a similar allusion, when he speaks of their otTering up " solemn rites and hymns," Ho/xttgi? kcu v/mvovi, — where the word Ho/xTraj is interpreted by Grabius to denote the solemn prayers "in Mysteriorum Celebratione." [Apol. i. 13.] With regard to the nature of the music used in God's Church in early times, we are utterly in the dark. Over the grand old Temple Music, in fact over the whole of the ancient Jewish Ritual Song, there is an impenetrable veil hanging.. There are doubtless natural reasons which may, in a measure, account for the fact ; especially this, that the ancient Jews seem to have possessed no musical characters ; so that the melodies used in their services have been traditional, and as an inevitable consequence, more or less at the mercy of the singers. And we must further bear in mind that, ever since the woful time of the Cajitivity, the Holy Nation, instead of maintaining its ancient grand Theocratic independence, has been in subjection successively to all the great powers of the world ; to the Baby- lonian, Medo-Persian, Grsco-Macedonian dynasties ; then, in turn, to Egypt and Syria ; then to the mighty power of Rome. When we consider this, and take into account also their intestine factions, their constant unfaithfulness to God, the gradual loss therefore of their inward strength and glory, and, with these, of the beauty and completeness of that perfect Ritual which at once clothed, exi3ressed, enshrined, and preserved their Holy Faith ; it is no matter for wonder that, even before their dispersion into all lands, the memory of much of their own ancient music had faded away, and their Church song had lost its character, under the ever-varying heathen influences to which it had so long been inciden- tally subjected. From the modern Jewish music we can learn nothing. Music, we are told, has been authoritatively banished from the Synagogue ever since the destruction of Jeitisalem ; the nation deeming its duty to be rather to mourn over its misfortunes in penitential silence, until the Coming of Messiah, than to exult in songs of praise. Hence the music which still practically exists in so many Jewish congregations throughout the world is more or less arbitrary, and destitute of traditional authority.- We are in equal doubt as to the nature of the ancient Christian music. All we know is, that anti- 1 Eph. v. 19 ; Col. iii. 16. In this threefold division it is scarcely possible to miss some special secret relation witli the three several Persons of the Ever- Blessed Trinity. (1) The "/'sa/j?!s," flowing to us from, and uniting us to, the Old Dispensation, primarily lead us up to, and reveal to us, "the Father of an infinite Majesty." (2) The "Hymns," originating, as we have seen, from tiie Eucharistic Hymn in the Upper Room, bring us into special connection with our Lord Jesus Christ. (3) The " S/>iritual Songs," as their very name indicates, rather represent the free, unrestrained outbreathings in Holy Song of that Divine Spirit which animates and inspires tlie Body of Christ. So that we find the first in our Psalters ; the second chiefly in our Liturgical Hymns, "Gloria in Excelsis," "Ter Sanctus," and the like; the third in our metrical songs, or odes, — those songs in which Christian feeling has ever delighted to find expression. The first class is rather occupied with God Himself ; the second, with God in His dealings with man through the One Mediator ; the third, with man in his dealings with God, through the Spirit of God quickening him. Reverence and devotion speak in the first ; dogma finds utterance in the second ; Christian emotion in the third. - Dr. Burney saj'S that "the only .Tews now on the globe who have a regular musical establishment in their Synagogue are the Germans, who sing in parts ; and these preserve some old melodies or chants which are thought to be very ancient." Padre Martini collected a great number of the Hebrew chants, which are simg in the different synagogues through- out Europe. Dr. Burney has inserted several of these in his History of Music. But, with a single exception, they shew not even tlie remotest affinity to the Gregorian system of melody ; nor, in the sequence of their notes, any possible observance of the ecclesiastical modes or scales. There is, however, one exception. One single melody bears so strange a resemblance (probably purely accidental) to a Church Chant, that it is worth preserving. Transcribed into modern notation, and written in a chant form, with simple harmony, it is as follows : — 54 3 Bitual IntcoDuction phonal singing was at a very early period introduced : in fact, there can be no reasonable doubt that it was a heritage bequeathed to the Christian Church from her elder Jewish sister, and that the Author of it was none other than the " Chief Musician " Himself It was at Antioch, however, that the practice seems first to have systematically established itself, and from thence it ultimately spread over Chris- tendom. Antioch was a city of great importance in the history of Church Music, for the Church there was the one which, next in order after that of Jerusalem, rose to pre-eminence, and it was in a special way the mother and metropolis of Gentile Christendom. The account which Socrates gives of the beginning of antiphonal singing in this city is too interesting to be passed over. " Now let us record whence the liymnes that are song interchangeably in the Church, commonly called Antemes, had their originall. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch in Syria, the third Bishop in succession from Peter the Apostle, who was conversant, and had great familiarity with the Apostles, saw a vision of Angels which extolled the Blessed Trinity with Hj-mnes that were sung interchangeably : and delivered unto the Church of Antioch the order and manner of singing expressed in the Vision. Thereof, it came to passe, that every Church received the same tradition. So much of Antemes." [Soceat. Hcd. Hist. vi. 12, Haumer's transl., 1636.] Antioch, as capital of Syria, capital also of Roman Asia in the East, became a great intellectual as well as theological centre, and it appears to have been the city in which Church Song first worked itself into shape ; where Jewish tradition and Gentile intelligence met and blended ; where the ancient Hebrew antiphonal system of Psalm recitation, and the shattered fragments of the old Ritual Song, allied themselves with, and were subjected to the laws of, modem Grecian musical science. It seems almost certain that Church music is rather Greek than Hebrew in origin. Hellenism had long been doing a Providential though subsidiary work in prepariug the world for Christianity. And though Greece had fallen under the iron grasp of the power of Rome, she had, in turn, subdued her conquerors to her literature, her language, and her arts. In the department of Christian Song, then, in the Church's first essays at giving musical expression to her sacred services, no doubt she would be mainly indebted to the science and skill of that nation which had already furnished her with a language, and which yet ruled the intellect of the world. The very names of the (so-called) ecclesiastical modes, or scales, — Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, Mixo-Lydian, etc., — bear incidental testimony to this fact, but perhaps the Church's metrical hymn-music is that branch of her song which is most directly and immediately borrowed from ancient Greece. We find the old Greek and Roman metres freely employed in the ancient Christian hymns ; and doubtless the music to which they were first allied bore no very remote resemblance to that used in the heathen temples. Metrical hymns appear to have been first used (to any extent) by heretics, for the promulgation of their tenets ; and then by the Church, with the view of counteracting heretical teaching, and popu- larizing the true faith. St. Chrysostom's attempts to overcome attractive Arian hjann-singing at Constantinople with more attractive orthodox hymn-singing, are well known. Socrates tells us of " the melodious concert and sweet harmony in the night season ;" of the " silver candlesticks, after the manner of crosses, devised for the bearing of the tapers and wax candles," presented to the good Bishop by " Eudoxia the Empress," and used by him to add beauty to his choral processions. It was shortly before this period that St. Ambrose had introduced into the West the system of Hymn-singing and Antiphonal Psalm-chanting. He is said to have learned it at Antioch, and to have brought his melodies thence. Responsive singing seems never to have been practised in the West till his time, and the circumstances attendant upon its introduction — for the purpose of relieving his people in their nightly services during the Arian Persecution — form an interesting episode in Church History. St. Augustine's touching account of the effect produced upon himself by the psalms and hymns in St. Ambrose's Church in Milan has often been quoted, and is well known. And it is in reference to the period just referred to that he informs us that " it was then ordained that Melody to the Title of the LI. and othur Psalms, or Lamnatzeach, i.e. "To the Chief Musician," as sung by tlie Spanish Jews. (Original Key, F.) ^-S-' 1 ■ - 1 1 / t' ' — ] 1 — 1 r ,) " rzi '^ ^A rj — ^ ■ — '^ l^\ G — o &— ?^ . (TJ 1 J~1h=lr r:i '^-T'l to tfje Iprapcr T6oofe. 55 the Psalms and Hymns should be sung 'secundum morem Orieutalium partium;'" and that from Milan this Eastern autiphonal system spread throughout all parts of Western Christendom. [Aug. Conf. ix. 7.] It is very difficult to ascertain accurately (and this is not the j^lace to discuss) the exact nature and extent of the influence exerted by St. Ambrose over the Music of the Church in the West. That his influence was very considerable is shewn by the fact of the extended use of the term " Cantus Ambrosianus " for Church song generally. Possibly this wide use of the term may account for the title given to the old melody of the " Te Deum," which — certainly, at least, in the fonn in which it has come down to us — cannot be of the extremely early date which its name, " The Ambrosian Te Deum," would api^ear to imply. But the name of St. Ambrose as a musical reformer was eclipsed by that of his illustrious successor St. Gregory, who flourished about 200 years after. As Church Song was all " Ambrosian " before his time, so lias it, since, been all " Gregorian." The ecclesiastical modes, or scales, were finally settled by him ; until the time when Church Music broke through its trammels, rejected the confined use of modes and systems essentially imperfect, and, under the fostering influence of a truer science, develojied its hidden and exhaustless resources. Without entering into any detail respecting the ancient Church scales, it may not lie out of place to state thus much : — I. The four scales admitted by St. Ambrose, called the Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, Mixo-Lydian (modifications of the ancient Greek scales so named), were simply, in modem language, our respective scales of D, E, F, G, without any accidentals ; the melodies written in each ranging only from the keynote to its octave, and ending properly on the keynote, thence called the " final." '^ Now each particular scale had its own reciting note (or "dominant"), generally & fifth above the final. Thus (had there been no exception) we should have had : — The respective "finals " of the 4 scales D E F G and their corresponding " domitumts," or notes for recitation A B C D i/?/jJO-Phrygian. Hy2J0-Ijjdia.n. HyjM-^lixo-Lydian. But there was one exception. For some reason or other, B was not apjjroved of as a recitation note ; and hence, in the second scale, C was substituted for it. II. To each of these four scales St. Gregory added a subordinate, or attendant scale — ^just as, in the ancient Greek system, each " jjiincipal " mode had two subsidiary, or " plagal," modes ; the one below (inro) it, and the other above (inrep) it — beginning four notes below it, and therefore characterized by the prefix viro {hypo, or under). Thus, to St. Ambrose's 1st (or Dorian) mode, St. Gregory added a iJ^/^JO-Doriau. To his 2nd (or Phrygian) ,, „ 3rd (or Lydiau) „ 4th (or Mixo-Lydian) „ „ So that the number of the scales, instead of four, became eight. Each added scale is essentially the same as its corresponding " principal " scale ; the " final " (or keynote, so to speak) of each being the same. Thus, D, for instance, is the jDroper final note for melodies, whether in the Dorian or Hypo-Dorian mode. The only points of difference between St. Gregory's added, and St. Ambrose's original, scales are these : — 1. That each added scale lies & fourth helow its original. Thus, while the melodies in the four primary scales lie respectively between D, E, F, G, and their octaves ; the melodies in the " plagal," or secondary, scales lie between A, B, C, D, and their octaves. 2. And next, that the recitation notes (or dominants) of the two sets of scales are different ; those of the added scales being respectively F, A, A, C. ' It is not meant that all the chants or melodies in each mode do really end on the "final ; " but that this is the note. in the scale, on wliich a melody, which came to a full close, icoald naturally terminate. 56 a JRitual 3!ntroDuction Thus the eight scales as finally settled by St. Gregory are as follows Name. 1st. Dorian 2nd. H}-po-Doriau 3rd. Phrygian 4th. Hj-po-Phrygian 5th. Lydian 6th. Hyjio-Lydian 7th. Mixo-Lydian 8th. H}i3o-Mixo-Lydian Range of 8 notes, beginninrj from "Final" {at Keynote), D D A D E E B E F F C F G G D G "Dominant" (or Reciting note). A F C A C A D C In strict Gregorian song the notes were all of uniform length ; and the only accidental ever allowed was the B flat. It was necessarily by slow degrees that Ritual song assumed its full proportions, and the Divine Service clothed itself, in all its parts, with suitable musical dress. Monotonic Recitative forms the basis of "plain song." In fact, in early times it would appear that, except in the Hymns, Church Music was exceedingly simple in character. St. Augustine tells us that St. Athanasius strongly discouraged the use of much inflexion of voice and change of note in the saying of the Divine OflSce. He would even have the Psalms sung almost in monotone : a practice, however, with which St. Augiistine's keen musical susceptibilities could not bring him wholly to sympathize. From the simple monotone, the other portions of the plain song little by little develope themselves. The bare musical stem becomes ever and anon foliate: its monotony is relieved with inflexions recurring according to fixed rule. Then it buds and blossoms, and flowers into melodies of endless shape. When the musical service of the Western Church became m a measure fixed, it consisted mainly of the four following di\'isions : 1. There was, first, the song for the prayers, the " Cantus OoUectanuu," which was plain monotone.^ 2. Secondly, there was the song for the Scripture Lections, the " Cantus Prophetarum," " Episto- larum," " Evangelii," which admitted certain inflexions. These inflexions were for the most part of a fixed character, and consisted (ordinarily) in dropping the voice, — a. at each comma or colon, a minor third ("accentus medius"); y8. at each full-stop, & perfect fifth ("accentus gravis ")." The same rule was followed in intonating the versicles and responses, the versicle and response together being regarded as a complete sentence ; the close of the f^irmer requiring the " mediate," the close of the latter the " grave " accent.^ 3. The third division embraces the Psalm-chants. These seem originally to have followed the rule of the " Cantus Prophetarum ;" to have consisted of plain monotone, relieved only by one of the " accents " at the close of each verse. In course of time the middle, as well as the end of the verse, came to be inflected. The inflexions became more varied and elaborate ; the result being a whole suc- cession of distinct melodies, or chants, following the laws of the several ecclesiastical modes. 4. As the third division admitted of far greater licence than either of the two former (ultimately, of very considerable melodic latitude), so was the fourth division more free and inirestrained than all. ' In the Roman use the monotone was unbroken ; but in the Sarum use there was generally the fall of a perfect fifth (entitled the " grave accent ") on the last syllable before the Amen. m A - men. - But in case the clause ended with a monosyllable, the fol- lowing variations took place : — /S. And the " accentus gi-avis ■I 3:2" :sz: to the " accentus acutus,' —Z2Z rz2i The " accentus medius ii^ Z2I IZ2I gave way to the ' accentus moderatus," or " interrogati vus, ' W. It is noticeable that while the Church of England (following the lead of Mcrbecke) has retained the use of the " mediate and " moderate " accents, she seems practically to ha\e parted with the "grave" and the "acute;" but the acute is still used for the I'reccs in Lincoln Cathedral. a Or their substitutes, in case of a monosyllabic termination. See the preceding note. to tbe Prapcr IBooh. 57 This embraces the music for the Hymns, metrical or prose ; for Prefaces, Autijihons, and the like. From these any continuous recitation note disappears altogether, and an unrestricted melody is the result. Church Song has passed through many vicissitudes ; becoming at times viciously ornate, debased, and emasculate. So long as the people took part in the service, the music was necessarily kept very simple. When they ceased to participate, and the service was performed for them, the once simple inflexions and melodies became expanded and developed, — ten, twenty, or more notes being constantly given to a syllable ; and the plain song became the very reverse of plain, and for purposes of edifica- tion wellnigh useless. Many protests were from time to time issued ; but it was not until the jjeriod of the Council of Trent, in the sixteenth century, that really effectual and energetic measures were taken to arrest the growing evil. At that time the laborious task of examining and revising the Plain Song of the Western Church was intrusted, by the musical commissioners appointed by the Council of Trent (one of them the great St. Carlo Borromeo), to Palestrina, who chose for his principal coadjutor the pains- taking Guidetti. But twenty years before Palestrina had set about his toilsome work a similar movement had been initiated in this country, in connection with our revised Office-books. When the great remodelling of our English Services took place, earlier in the same century ; when the ^^^^.^ ^ energetic and successful attempt was made to render them once more suitable, not lish service- only for private and claustral, but for public congregational use, and at the same time °° ^' to disencumber them of any novelties in doctrine or practice which in the course of ages had fastened round them ; when the old Mattins, Lauds, and Prime of the Sai-um Breviary were translated into the vernacular, compressed, and recast into the now familiar form of our English " Mattins," or " Morning Prayer," and the Vespers and Compline into that of our " Evening Prayer," or " Evensong ; " the question of the music for these rearranged Offices forced itself ujaon the notice of our Church rulers. And it is most interesting to note how the same wise conservative spirit, which had guided the changes in the luords, manifested itself in the corresponding changes in the viusic with which those words were to be allied. Radical alteration in either department there was none, simplification being the main object. And thus, in the province of Church Music, the great aim was not to discard, but to utilize the ancient plain song, to adapt it to the ti'anslated Offices, to restore it to something more of its primitive " plain- ness," to rid it of its modern corruptions, its wearisome " newnas " and ornaments and flourishes ; so that the Priest's part, on the one hand, might be intelligible and distinct, and not veiled in a dense cloud of unmeaning notes, and the people's part, on the other, so easy and straightforward as to render their restored participation in the public worship of the Sanctuary at once practicable and pleasurable. It has been hastily imagined by some in modern days that our great liturgical revisionists of the sixteenth century designed to abolish the immemorial custom of the Church of God, alike in Jewish and Christian times, of saying the Divine Service in some form of solemn musical recitative, and to introduce the unheard-of custom of adopting the ordinary colloquial tone of voice. But such a serious and uncatholic innovation never appears to have entered into their heads. The most that can be said of our English Post-Reformation rule on this subject is, that in case of real incapacity on the part of the priest, or other sufficient cause, the oi'dinary tone of voice may be employed ; but this only as an exceptional alternative. The ride itself remains unchanged, the same as of old. The Rubrical directions, " read," " say," " sing," expressed in the old technical language, are sub- stantially what they were before. The first of these words, " legere," was the most general and com- prehensive; merely expressing recitation from a book, without defining the "modus legendi," or stating whether the recitation was to be plain or inflected. The usual modes of recitation are expressed in the words " say " and " sing ; " the former (" dicere ") pointing to the simpler, the latter (" cantare ") to the more ornate mode. Thus the old " legere " might signify (and often did) ornate singing ; and it might signify (and often did) plain monotone ; and it is observable that the words " say " and " sing " are often employed interchangeably in the old rubrics, when their specific distinctions do not come into prominence. ^ The same holds good as to our present Book; For instance, in one place we find a rubric ordering ' "How depe and inwarde comforte shoulde yt be to you to synge and rede and say thys holy seruyce." \0u7- Ladu's Mirrc; E. E. T. Soc. ed. p. 19.] :> y y y i 58 a iRitual JntroDuction that the Athanasian Creed shall be " read here." Now, the pohit of this rubric being the particular position in which the Creed shall be recited, and not the particular onode of its recitation, the general term " legere" is employed. The "modus legeudi" is determined by other rubrics, which prescribe that it may be " either said, or sung ; " which allow (that is) of both modes of choral recitation, either the plain or the ornate ; either the simple monotone, or the regular chant. The same thing occurs in another rubric, which (like the former), dealing with the position, not the mode, orders the " Venite " to be " read " in a certain place. Now the general term " read " in this instance is obviously equivalent with the word " sing ; " the Church of England always contemplating that the Psalms shall be not said on the monotone, but sung to regular chants.i The two works which dii-ectly illustrate the mind of the English Church as to the musical render- ing of her reformed Service are, 1st, the Litany published by Cranmer with its musical notation (the first instalment of our Book of Common Prayer) ; and, 2ndly, the more important work containing the musical notation of all the remcdnder of that Book, edited (plainly under the Archbishop's supervision) by John Merbecke, and published " cum privilegio " in the same year with the first Prayer Book of Edward YI. A word or two may be said respecting both these ijublications. 1. The Litany was published in 1544 in a work entitled "An exhortation unto praier thought mete by the King's Majestie and his clergie, to be read &c. Also a Litany with suffrages to be said or sung." Now this Litany was set to the beautiful and simple old Litany chant still used in most of our Cathedrals and Parish Churches where the service is chorally rendered. It was republished by Grafton, with harmonies in five parts, a month after its first appearance. Some twenty years afterwards it was again harmonized by Tallis ; and it has been harmonized and set in different foi'ms by many of our English Church musicians. 2. The other publication was entitled " The Booke of Common Praier noted," wherein " is con- teyned so much of the Order of Common Praier as is to be song in Churches." Like the Prayer Book itself, it contains nothing absolutely neiu: the old English Service Music being simplified, and adapted to our revised and translated Offices. The adjustment of the musical notation is as follows : — i. For the Prayers, the old " Cantus CoUectarum," or simple monotone, is used.^ ii. For the Versicles and Responses, the old inflected " Cantus Prophetarum." ^ iii. In the Scripture Lections, however, it seems manifest that it was not in contemplation to retain the use of this last-mentioned inflected song, which of old appertained to them. In the Pre-Refomia- tion Service-books the " Capitula " and the Lections were generally very shoi-t ; the latter being moreover broken and interrupted by Antiphons. Here, inflected musical recitative might not be inappropriate. But to sing through a long lesson from the English Bible in the same artificial method would be plainly wearisome, if not somewhat grotesque.-" Hence our rubric ordered that " in such places where they do sing, then shall the lesson be sung in a plain tune, after the manner of distinct reading ; and likewise the Epistle and Gospel." Now here the emphatic word appears to be "plain" as opposed to " inflected ; " and the object of the rubric, to recommend the substitution of the " Cantus CoUectarum," or monotone, for the Lessons, Epistle, and Gospel, in place of the ancient " Cantus Prophetarum." It is needless to point out, by the way, in the face of a rubric which defines the mode in which even the lessons are to be " sung," how little idea there was on the part of our Liturgical Revisers of interfering generally with the ancient musical performance of Divine Service. It may not be out of place here to remark, that the above rubric which ordered the "plain tune" for the lessons, was, after the lapse of above a century, ultimately withdrawn. The Puritans strongly urged its withdrawal at the Savoy Conference, prior to the last Re\dew in 1661. Our Divines at first refused to yield, alleging that the objections urged against the use of monotone for Holy Scripture were groundless. However, they gave way at last : and it is, perhaps, happy that they did. For, while in the case of solemn public addresses to Almighty God, the grave, devout, unsccular, ecclesiastical recita- tive is alone appropriate ; in the case of addresses to iivan, even though they are lessons of Holy Scrip- ' " The Psalter, or Psalma of David, pointed as they arc to be mwi (or B.iid) in Churches." The Ps,-»lter, wo see, is speci- ally pointed for singing : the pointing itself plainly expressing the mind and wish of the Church. The "a.iy " only gives a pcrmisaible alternative where there is no choir. ' In two instances (but only two) Merbecke has adopted a special peculiarity of the Sarum (as distinguished from the Koman) ilite, in the employment of the grave accent (see p. 56) on the last syllable of the collect preceding the " Amen." ' .SVc also ]). ."if!. * Sec, however, an instance of this method described in a note on Palm Sunday. to tijc Ptaj>ct IBook. 59 ture, which are read for purposes of instruction, a freer and less formal mode of utterance seems alike suitable and desirable. iv. The Te Deum is sot to the aucicut Ainbn^siau melody, simplified and adapted to the English words from the version given in the Sarum Breviary. V. The other Canticles and the Psalms are assigned to the old Gregorian chants. The Book does not actually contain the Psalter with its chants (just as it does not contain the Litany with its music, which had been already published). A simple Gregorian melody (8th tone, 1st ending) is given for the "Venite;" after which is added, "and so forth with the rest of the Psalms as they are appointed." The primary object of this was, probably, to keep the Book in a reasonably small compass, and avoid the great additional expense of printing a musical notation for each verse of the entire Psalter. But partly, no doubt, it was the uncertainty then felt (and even to the present day, to some extent experi- enced) as to the best mode of selecting and adapting the old chants to English words, which caused the editors instinctively to shrink from the responsibility of so soon determining these delicate points, and to prefer leaving it to the different Choirs and Precentors to make experiments, and adapt and select according to their own judgement. There is no proof that it was intended to fasten this par- ticular book upon the English Church. It was jarobably of a tentative and experimental character. It was put forth as a companion to our Revised Service-book, as a practical exi:)lauation of its musical rubrics, and as also furnishing examples and specimens of the ^uay in which the framers of our vernacular Offices originally contemplated that they should be allied with the old Latin Ritual Song. vi. In the music for the Hallelujah (" The Lord's Name be praised "), for the Lord's Prayer in the Post-Communion, and for the Kyrie (the melody of the latter borrowed from the Sarum " Missa pro Defuuctis "), we find merely the old Sarum plain song reproduced in simplified form. vii. The Nicene Creed, the Olm'ia in Excdsis, and the Offertory Sentences appear to be all original settings, although they are, as is sufficiently evident, founded, to a considerable extent, on the old Church plain song. From what has been said it will incidentally appear, 1st, how fully determined were our sixteenth- century Revisionists that the Offices in their new form should not lose their old choral and musical character ; and thus that Divine Service should still continue what it had ever theoretically been, a "Service of Song;" and, 2nd, how earnestly anxious they were that the music should be of a plain and simple character, so that it might bo a real aid in the great object they had before them, that of restoring to the people their long-suspended right of due and intelligent participation in the public worship of the Sanctuary. In illustration of these points, Cranmer's letter to Henry VIII., dated Oct. 7, 1544, is interesting; and although it is printed entire at p. 21, it is necessary again to refer to it in connection with our present subject. After speaking of the English Litany already published with musical notation ; and of certain other Litanies, or " Processions," which he had been preparing, and which he requests the King to cause to be set to music, on the ground that " if some devout and solemn note be made there- unto," " it will much stir the hearts of all men to devotion ;" he proceeds to offer his opinion as to the kind of music suitable for these Litanies, as also for other parts of the Service : — " In mine opinion the Song that shall be made thereunto would not be full of notes, but as near as may be for every syllable a note ; as be, in the Matitis ami Evensong, ' Venite,' the Hymns ' Te Deum,' ' Benedictus,' ' Magnificat,' ' Nunc Dimittis,' and all the Psalms and Versicles ; and, in the 3Iass, ' Gloria in Excelsis,' ' Gloria Patri,' the Creed, the Preface, the ' Pater noster,' and some of the ' Sanctus ' and ' Agnus.' As conceri;ing the ' Salve, festa dies,' the Latin note, as I think, is sober and distinct enough ; wherefore I have travailed to make the verses in English, and have put the Latin note unto the same. Nevertheless, they that be cunning in singing can make a much more solemn note thereto. I made them only for a proof, to see how EngUsh would do in song." 1 The last portion of this letter introduces a subject on which it is necessary to add a few word^ viz. the use of Metrical Hymns in public worship. Cranmer himself was most anxious to have retained the use of them, and with that view set about translating the Breviary Hymns. But he was so dissatisfied with his attempts, that eventually he gave up the idea. This loss was a serious one, and soon made itself experienced. Fervent Christian feeling must find means of expression ; and if not provided with a legitimate outlet, such as the Hymns • For the Melody o£ the Hymn "Salve, festa dies," see the "Hymual Noted," No. 62. 6o a iaitual IntroDuction of the Church were intended to furnish, will vent itself in ways irregular, and, perhaps, in unortliodox language. It is difficult to ascertain the exact time when the practice of popular Hymn and metrical Psalm singing established itself in connection with our revised Ritual, though independently of its direct authority. Such singing was in use very early in Elizabeth's reign, having doubtless been borrowed from the Protestants abroad. For the purpose of giving a quasi-official sanction to a custom which it would have been very unwise to repress (and thus, through a sort of bye-law, to supply a practical want in our authorized public Ritual), it was ordained, by a Royal Injunction in the year 1559, that, while there was to be " a modest and distinct song so used in all parts of the Common Prayers in the Church that the same might be understanded as if it were read without singing ; " (in other words, while the old traditional plain song, in its simplified form, is to be employed throughout the whole of the service ; yet,) " for the comforting of such as delight in nnisick it may be permitted, that in the beginning or at the end of the Common Prayer, either at morning or evening, there may be sung an hymn or such like song to the praise of Almighty God, in the best sort of melody and musick that may be conveniently devised ; having resnect that the sentence [i.e. sense] of the hymn may be under- standed and perceived." To this Injunction of Queen Elizabeth we owe our modem Anthem ; on winch it is necessary to add a few words. The tenn itself is merely an Anglicized synonym of the word Autiphou. Its old spelling was Antem, Anteme, or Antemj^ne.^ Its origin is the Greek word avrlfpwvov, or rather uvTiu>va (anti- phona : neut. plur.), which is the old ecclesiastical term. From antlphona comes the Italian and Spanish antifona, as well as the old English form antcplme, and the Anglo-Saxon antcfn. Now, just a.s the Anglo-Sax;on word ste/n (the end, or prow, of a ship) became ste^i, in English, so did Ante/>i become Ante??i. The fiirther change of the initial ant into unth is merely parallel with the coiTespond- ing change of the old English te and to into thcc and that.' From the fact of Barrow in one of his sermons spelling the word " AntJajmn," Dr. Johnson and others have hastily inferred that its tnie origin is to be traced in avrl vjulvo^ or avOvfivof (anti-hymnus, or anthymnus), which would give it the meaning of a responsive hymn. And it is by no means improbable that the accidental similarity in sound between the final syllable of " Anthem " and the word "hj-mn," coupled with the fact of the intelligible, and in a measure correct, meaning which this plausible derivation would seem to afford, has not been without its influence in determining the popular sense of the word itself But there is not a vestige of authority for this latter derivation, and it is certain that ^wi/j;, not y/xi'o?, is the root out of which " Anthem " grows. In its earliest form, the Anthem, or Antiphon, seems to have been a single verse out of any Psalm repeated after the recitation of the Psalm (and, in later times, before its recitation also) with a view of fixing the keynote, so to speak, of the Psalm ; of bringing into prominence, and fastening attention upon, some special idea contained \\4thin it. In course of time the Antiphons came to be selected from other Psalms than the particular ones to which they were affixed ; and appropriate passages of Scrip- ture from any book, and even short uninspired sentences in prose or verse, came to be similarly applied.' When the use of a " Hymn, or such like song," was authoritatively permitted at the beginning or end of Common Prayer — not only with a view of adding dignity and interest to the worship of Almighty God, and rendering the Service of Praise more worthy of Him to Whom it was offered, but with the twofold secondary end also (1) of "comforting" musical people by allowing the strains of the Sanctuary a greater freedom of developement than the mere chant and plain-song intonations admitted, and thus (2) of encouraging amongst all classes the study and practice of nnisic — our Church conijwsers, in casting about for suitable words, seem first to have had recourse to the old Antiphons, many of which they set to music. Other similar brief and characteristic passages of Holy Scripture, Prayers, Hynuis, and the » See Our Lady's Mirror, p. 163, E. E. T. Soc. ed. at the bottom of Antiphon, or Anthem (nheuce wc find old ' For a discussion on the derivation and use of the word writers speaking of tlie I'sahns as sung Anthem-visc, i.e. rc- Antliem, tie Nolm anil (Queries, '2nd Series, xi. 457, 491 ; xii. ' sponsively), so, in the actual and varied use of the word we 90, l.')l. Also Skeat'.s Kttjm. Dirt. s. r. \ find sometimes the responsive and sometimes the musical ' From the fact of the Antiphon giving tlie keynote or ■ clement coming into prominence : occasionally, one or the leading idea of the Psalm to which it was attached, wc find I other clement entirely disappearing. In the text of a sermon, the word Anthem frccpicntly used for the text of a sermon. for instance, tlicre is nothing nn/.iiVn/. In a modern Anthem It may be remarked, that as the idea of responsive music lies I there is notliing necessarily renponsife. to tbc IPrapcr T5oofe. 6i like, were speedily selected for the same purpose ; but the name " Anthems," whether they happened to have been used as Antiphons or not, equally attached itself to all. Many have endeavoured to discover some definite ritual significance in the word itself, and in the position occupied by the Anthem in our Service, to account for its name. It has been regarded as the intentional "residuum" of the Antiphons of the old Service-books. But such theories, though interesting, are unsubstantial. It is all but certain that it was through a loose, accidental, popular application of an old term, the strict meaning of which was not a matter of much concern, rather than through any deliberate conviction of the modern Anthem being, practically or theoretically, identical with, or a legitimate successor and representative of the old Antiphon, that the name Anthem finally allied itself with that class of musical compositions or Sacred Motets which now form a recognized adjunct to our English Service.' It may be added that, in country parishes, where a trained choir could not be obtained, a metrical Psalm would be sung in the place of the Anthem, and fall under the same general designation. The actual period of the introduction of the term in its familiar modern and popular sense, to denote a piece of sacred music for the use of the Church, may perhaps be ap|H-oximately illustrated by a comparison of the titles of two successive editions of a very imiDortant musical work. Within the year after the publication of Queen Elizabeth's Injunction giving permission for the use of a "Hymn, or such like song," John Day printed his great choral work entitled, " Certain notes set forthe in 4 & 5 parts, to be sung at the Morning, Communion, & Evening Prayer, very necessary for the Church of Xt to be frequented & used. And unto them be added divers godly Prayers & Psalmes in the like form to the Honour and Praise of God." Five years later, this fine work, to which Tallis with other famous Church writers contributed, was reprinted, though with a somewhat different title : " Morning & Evening Prayer & Conimunion set forth in 4 parts, to be sung in Churches, both for men & children, with divers other godly Prayers & Anthems of sundry men's doyings." In the second edition we thus have the word "^');/'/ie?ns" used, where in the first edition "Psalmes" had been employed. An illustration of the early actual use of the Anthem in its modern English sense is afforded by Strype, in his description of the Lent Services which took place in the Chapel Royal, within a year of the time when the permissive Injunction for the use of "a Hymn, or such like song," was published, at the beginning of Elizabeth's reign. •■'The same day" (he writes, i.e. Midlent Sunday, March 24, 1560), "in the afternoon, Bp. Barlow, one of King Edward's Bishops, now Bishop of Chichester, preached in his Habit before the Queen. His sermon ended at five of the clock : and, presently after, her Chapel went to Evening Song. The Cross as before standing on the Altar ; and two Candlesticks, and two Tapers burning in them. And, Service concluded, a good AiUheni was sung." [See also Machyn's Diary, 1560.] Thus the place of the Anthem became practically settled after the third Collect, with which Morning and Evening Prayer at that time concluded ; although it was not till above a hundred years after this period that there was any rubrical recognition of the Anthem, or direction concerning the time of its performance. When, however, at the last Review, in 1661, the concluding prayers were added, the Anthem was not removed to the end of the Service, as before, but was still allowed to retain its old traditional place after the third Collect. And it was with a view of fixing this position that the Rubric was inserted, " In Choirs and places where they sing, here followeth the Anthem." But although this is the only place where the introduction of a " Hymn, or such like song," or " Anthem," is definitely authorized, yet custom has sanctioned a much freer interpretation of the Rubric than its words actually convey. Practical need has asserted and substantiated its claim. The Rubric, or rather the original Injunction on which the Rubric was based, has shewn itself conveniently expansive and elastic, and the word " Anthem " proved a pregnant and germinant one, coverincr at once the Hymn, the Introit, and the Anthem proper. The truth is, however, that it is to custom and necessity, not to Rubrics or Injunctions, that we owe the general introduction of Music, as distinct from Plain song, into our Revised Offices. Custom drew forth the Injunction of Queen Elizabeth ; the Injunction subsequently gave rise to the Rubric. But as Music originally found its way into our ' It will also be observed that the two English words — really identical, and coming from the same root — Antiphon and Anthem, have finally parted company ; the former retaining its ancient ritual, the latter actiuiring a modern musical meaning. ' ' Antem y s as moche to say as a sowny nge before. For yt ys begonne before the Psalmes yt is as moche to saye as a sownynge ageynste. " [Our Lady's Mirror, p. 94. E E. T. Soc. ed.i 62 3 iRitual 3lntroDuction Reformed Service independently of written authority, so, independently of written authority, does it continue. For the very necessity which received formal recognition in the Anthem-Rubric, refuses to be satisfied with or limited by the strict terms of that Rubric. The Anthem, in some shape or other, was a fact before ever any written authority called it into legal existence ; and in like manner, Hymn- singing, over and above the Anthem, has been, and is, and will be, an actual fact, notwithstanding its apparent want of fonnal rubrical sanction. The result of all is, that while " the Anthem " still retains its place, as a special offering to God of the firstfraits of sacred musical skill and science, " in choirs and places " where such an offering is possible, the additional introduction elsewhere of suitable Hymns, whether in the Eucharistic or other Offices, as aids and reliefs to the Services, is not only not thereby excluded, but practically and subordinately and implicitly sanctioned. This Section may be concluded with some practical rules on the subject of which it has treated. 1. Although, as we have seen, there was no deliberate intention, on the part of our Liturgical Revisers, that the old Antiphon should be reproduced, or find an exact counterpart in the modem Anthem ; still, on the other hand, it is most desirable that the Anthem should practically — by its appropriate character, by its responding accordantly to the Service of the day, bringing out and emphasizing its special theme — vindicate its right to the title it has obtained, and prove itself a legitimate successor and representative of the Antiphon. ^ Anthems or Hymns may thus become invaluable auxiliaries ; imparting a freedom and variety to our Service which it would not otherwise possess, and rendering it susceptible of easy adaptation to the ever-changing phases of the Church's year. If the " Hj^uu, or such like song," does not jjossess any of this " Antiphonal " character, if it is regarded merely in the light of so much music interjjolated into the Office by way of relief, it becomes simply an element of disintegration, splitting up the Service into several isolated fragments, instead of imparting a unity and consistency and character to the whole. Hence the need of due and reverent care in the selection of the Anthems and Hymns. Judiciously. chosen, they may not only give new beauty and meaning to our Services, but may also prove most useful and delightful means of propa- gating and popularizing Church doctrine, and promoting the growth of genuine and healthy Church feeling. 2. As regards the position of the Hymns. The Elizabethan Injunction specifies the " beginning or end of Common Prayer ;" and the Rubric says, " after the third Collect." So that we have three available places for " Hymns, or such like songs." The Hymn at the beginning of Common Prayer, although desirable on great Festivals, as a kind of Antiphon fixing the keynote of the whole succeed- ing Service, is somewhat inconsistent with the general penitential character of the Introduction to our Mattins and Evensong, and should not, therefore, be ordinarily employed.- During the Eucharistic Office, the singing of Hymns, independently of the Nicene Creed, and the great Eucharistic Hymn " Gloria in Excdsis," is most desirable. There may be (1) an introductory " Introit ;" (2) a Hymn, or (as the alternative provided in Edward's first Prayer Book) the "Agnus Dei,"^ after the Prayer of Consecration ; and (3) a Hymn, or (as a very suitable alternative) the " Nunc Bimittis," when the Service is over, and the remains of the Consecrated Elements are being reverently consumed. In the Office for Holy Matrimony, the Order for the Burial of the Dead, and other occasional Offices, Hymns may be often most appropriately and happily introduced. 3. With regard to the exact nature of the music to be employed in the Psalms, Hymns, Canticles, Anthems, etc., it would be most vmwise, even if possible, to lay down any strict nilcs. While it would be a great error to discard many of the ancient Hymn-tunes and Psalm-chants of the Church, it would be a no less serious error to keep exclusively to them. The Church must bring forth from her treasure- house "things new and old;" not only the severe (and to some ears uncouth) unisonous strains of bygone times, but also the rich, full harmonics of modem days. All must be freely, fearlessly ' It should, perhaps, bo remarked, that there still remain in the Prayer I'ook a few instances of the word Anthem retaining its old meaning. For example, tlic Invitatory I'H.alm, " Vcnit/' fxtiltr7iiuH," is regarded iu some sort as a fixed AntijAon before the I'salms for the day, and is in tliis sense called an Anthem ; the Rubric enjoining its constant use, "except on E.aster-d.ay, upon which unnther Anthem is aijpointed. " The word is also uscil in its old sense in the following pa.ssago from the Introduction, "Concerning the .-^en'iee of the Church:" "For this cause bo cut oil' Anthems, Responds, Invitatories, and such like things as did break the continual course of the reading of the Scripture. " The "O Saviour of the world," after the Vsalm in the " Visitation of tlie .Sick," is strictly an Antiphon. - See, however, a note on the invitatory character of tho Sentences in a note upon them. ' "In tho Communion time tho Clerks shall sing — " ' () Lamb of (!od, th.at takcst away tho sins of tho world, have mercy upon us. " '0 Lamb of (lod, etc., grant us Thy peace,' " to t&e IPraper TBoofe. 63 employed, according as taste, or special circumstances, or choral capability may dictate. Experiments must be made, mistakes perhaps braved; for many questions as to the best practical methods of linking together the " sphere-born, harmonious sisters, Voice and Verse " in the Service of the Sanctuary remain as yet undecided. Hasty dogmatism, and intolerant exclusivencss, in reference to the accessories of Divine Worship, are much to be deprecated, for in all matters of external apparatus the Church of England has yet much to learn. In putting forth the full strength of the Prayer Book, and developing its inward powers and energies, there will be also gradually disclosed outward features and graces which seem new and strange from their having been so long latent. But it is certain that all the resources of the Church, external as well as internal, arc needed for modern times ; and that all appliances, musical, ritual, aesthetic, should bo brought to bear on the Services rendered to God by so cultivated an age, and set forth before men to win and helj) their souls. God having given all these outward aids — music, ritual, art — He means them to be employed for His glut, on consideration, it will be seen that the words are cautionary, and were intended to prevent any misconception as to the force of this Act, which was passed "for explana- tion of a Clause contained in" 17 Charles I. c. 2. The Act merely excludes these Canons from any Parliamentary autliority which it might be supposed to confer on them ; but then it does precisely the same with "any other Eccle- siastical Laws or Canons not formerly confirmed, allowed, or enacted by Parliament :" this necessarily includes the Canons of 160.3-4, yet their authority is admitted The Act in no way affects the recognized authority derived b}^ tlie Canons of 1640, or by any otliers, from Royal Letters Patent: on tlie contrary, it helps to confirm such authority by declaring that it was not meant "to abridge or diminish the King's Majesty's Supremacy in Ecclesiastical m.atters and affairs;" and of this the confirmation of Canons was made an im- portant p.art by the Act of .Submission 25 Henry VIII. c. 19. 68 a Bitual 3IntroOuction the Churches of St. Paul, Knightsbridge, and St. Barnabas, Pimlico, led to a definitive judgement on this point by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. In interpreting this Rubric, the Judges determined that " the term ' ornaments ' in Ecclesiastical Law is not confined, as by modern usage, to articles of decoration or embellishment, but it is used in the larger sense of the word ' ornamentum,' which, according to the interpretation of Forcellini's Dictionary, is used ' pro quocumque apparatu, seu instrumento.' All the several articles used in the performance of the Services and Rites of the Church are 'ornaments.' Vestments, Books, Cloths, Chalices, and Patens, are amongst Church Ornaments ; a long list of them will be found extracted from Lyndwood, in Dr. Phillimore's Edition of BuRx's Ecclesiastical Laiv (vol. i. pp. 375-377). In modern times Organs and Bells are held to fall under this denomination." Ha\"ing thus defined the term " Ornaments," the Court of Appeal then interpreted the expressions "Authority of Parliament" and "Second Year" as connected with the reign of Edward VI.: their conclusion being arrived at thus : — After noticing the alterations in King Edward's Second Prayer Book (which diminished the number of the Ornaments prescribed in his First Book), and referring to the abolition of the Reformed Services by Queen Mary, they state that " on the Accession of Queen Elizabeth, a great controversy arose between the more violent and the more moderate Reformers as to the Church Service which should be re-established, whether it should be according to the First, or according to the Second Prayer Book of Edward the Sixth. The Queen was in favour of the First, but she was obliged to give waj', and a compromise was made, by which the Ser\aces were to be in conformity with the Second Prayer Book, with certain alterations ; but the Ornaments of the Church, whether those woni or those otherwise used bj' the Minister, were to be according to the First Prayer Book." Then they compare the four Directions, as to the Ornaments, which occur in the Elizabethan Act of Uniformity and the Prayer Books of 1559, 1603-4, 1662 (given already at p. 64), declaring of them that " they all obviously mean the same thing, that the same dresses and the same utensils, or articles, which were used under the First Prayer Book of Edward the Sixth may still be used." Further, they discuss an important question which was raised as to the date of the Royal Assent to the Act of Uniformity which legalized the Prayer Book of 1549, and they resolve that the " use " of the Book " and the Injunctions contained in it, were established by authority of Parliament in the Second Year of Edward the Sixth, and this is the plain meaning of the Rubric." It may indeed be questioned whether what can be gathered from the records of the time warrants this decision as to the date in question ;i but if it be an error, it is practically unimportant in connection with their entire interpretation of the Rubric ; for, whether 1547— the date of King Edward's Injimctions, or 1549 — the date of the First Prayer Book, be the " Second Year " mentioned in the Rubric, the result is the same, because no change was made in the Ornaments between those years. Moreover, the Rubric has now been judicially interpreted by a court from Avhich there lies no appeal, and therefore that interpreta- tion, and that only, is the sole ground upon which the members of the Church of England can legally stand in endeavouring to carry out the requirements of the Rubric on Ornaments. One thing more the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council shewed in reference to the meaning of this Rubric, viz. that though it is prescriptive, it is not exhaustive : this opinion was arrived at from their consideration of the fact, that the Second Prayer Book of Edward VI. (like the First Book, and indeed the previous Service-books) " does not expressly mention " everything which, nevertheless, it is certain was used under it, e.g. the Paten (just as the First Book does not mention, e.g., the Linen Cloth) ; and also from the circumstance that they had to decide whether the Credence-tnhle (which is not prescribed noDiinatini) could be regarded as a Legal Ornament. The opinion of the Court is thus stated : " Here the Rubrics of the Prayer Book become important. Their Lordships entirely agreed with the opinions expressed by the learned Judges [i.e. of the Consistory and Arches Courts] in these cases, and in ' Faulkner v. Lichfield,' that in the performance of the services, rites, and ceremonies ' The First Year of Edward VI. was from Jan. 28, 1647, to Jan. 27, 1548. The Second Year of Edward VI. waa from Jan. 28, 1548, to Jan. 27, 1549. Tlie I'liird Yrnr of Edward VI. was from Jan. 28, 1549, to Jan. 27, 15.50. both kinds. A Fonu for carrying out this Act was issued by Proclamation on May 8, 1548, and thenceforward until June 9, 1549, the ancient Salisbury Use with a supplementary Englisli service for communicating the Laity [.see p. 13] was the only form .sanctioned l)y law for tlic celebration and iidministration of the Holy Communion. Thus during the Up to Dec. 24, 1547, the ancient Salisbury Use waa alone \ whole of lOilward VI. 's Si-roitd Year, the ancient Latin Service sanctioned by law. On Dec. 24, l.W, the Act of Parliament I was retained, and until half of his Third Year li.ad expired was liasacd which gave legal force to the resolution of Con- I and witli tlie ancient Service the ancient vocation that the Holy Kuohariat shouM he administered in also retained. to tbe Iprapcr IBook. 69 ordered by the Prayer Book, the directions contained in it must be strictly observed ; that no omission and no addition can be permitted ; but they are not prepared to hold that the use of all articles not expressly mentioned in the Rubric, although quite consistent with, and even subsidiary to the Service, is forbidden. Organs are not mentioned ; yet because they are auxiliary to the singing they are allovired. Pews, cushions to kneel upon, pulpit-cloths, hassocks, seats by the Communion Table, are in constant use, yet they are not mentioned in the Rubric." So, as their Lordships further argued, there being a Rubric which " directs that at a certain point in the course of the Communion Service (for this is, no doubt, the true meaning of the Rubric) the Minister shall place the bread and wine on the Communion Table," in their judgement, " nothing seems to be less objectionable than a small side-table, from which they may be conveniently reached by the officiating Minister, and at the proper time transferred to the Communion Table." One remark, however, may be made before quitting the consideration of this judicial rendering of the Rubric ; and it is this — that although it so completely covered the whole debateable ground by deciding that " the same " things " which ivere used under the First Prayer Book of Edward the Sixth may still be used," it does not follow that all such things can be legally restored now quite iiTespective of any differences in the Prayer Book of 1549 as compared with that of 1662, — the one at present in use. It may not be useless to say, that before any Edwardian Ornament is reintroduced, under the terms of this decision, it must first be inquired whether the particular Ministration in which it is pro- posed to employ it is now so essentially the same as it was in 1549 that the Ornament has the like symbolical or practical use which it had then. It will probably be found that very few indeed of those Ornaments are inapplicable at this time ; but to determine this it is important to proceed now to ascertain — First, What were the customary' Ornaments of that period. There are four sources from which it may be ascertained with considerable accuracy what " Orna- ments were in the Church of England, by the authority of Parliament, in the second year of the reign of King Edward the Sixth." These are — I. The ancient Canon Law, which is held to have been then (as now) statutably binding upon the Church by the 25th Henry VIII. c. 19, in all points where it is not repugnant to or inconsistent with later Ecclesiastical Law. II. The Salisbury Missal, which was the Liturgy chiefly ^ used, and of which a new edition was published by authority in 1541 : the Bangor, Hereford, and York books (especially the latter) may also be appealed to as illustrative of or supplementary to the Salisbur}' book, for they had long been more or less in use. "The Order of the Communion" of 1548 — which was an English supplement to the Latin Mass, to come in after the Communion of the Priest for the purpose of communicating the Laity in both kinds — expressly directed in its first Rubric that " until other order shall be provided,' there should be no " varying of any other rite or ceremony in the Mass." Hence the ancient Service- books continued to be used during the whole of " the second year of Edward the Sixth," and until the First English Prayer Book was published in 1549. [See p. 13, and App. to the Liturgy.] III. The directions, explicit or implicit, in the Prayer Book of 1549. IV. The Inventories of Ornaments which were made in pursuance of Edward VI. 's Instructions to the Commissioners appointed in 1552 to survey the Church goods throughout the kingdom. These Inventories are very numerous, and for the most part are preserved in the Public Record Office : they do not indeed exhibit such full catalogues as would have been found in 1549, for many things had been sold (especially where they were duplicates) to meet Church expenses of various kinds ; and some too had been embezzled. But they are thus the more trustworthy, as being likely to shew what Articles it was deemed needful to retain for the Services then authorized. Three of these Inventories (and they are by no means the richest which might have been chosen) are here selected for comparison, as affording a probably fair specimen of the rest, viz. a Cathedral, a London Parish Church, and a Country Parish Church. Secondly, It must be determined what Ornaments, whether by express j)i'escri'ption or by jylain implicatiov , are now pointed out for use in the Ministrations of the Church of England. ' The preference wliieh seems to have been given to the I served by all and singular clerics throughout the Province of Rites of Sarum is illustrated by the circumstance that the Canterbury, in saying their canonical hours." [Wilkins' Convocation of Canterbury decreed, March 3, 1541, that the Concilia, iii. 861, 862.] "use and custom of the Church of Salisbury should bo ob- ' 70 3 Eitual JntroDuction V. These Ornaments are to be sought in the Canons of 1G03-4 and of 1640 ; also in the directions, explicit or implicit, of the present Book of Common Prayer. "ORNAMENTS OF THE CHURCH." English Canons A.D. 740 to 1463. Altars of Stone. A Table. Frontal for the High Altar. A clean white large linen cloth for the Altar. C'orporas (and Case). " A veiy clean cloth " for "the Priest to wipe his fingers and lips after receiving the Sacrament. " Paten. Chalice. Wine and Water to be used, — implying ves- sels for them. Bread to be offered by the faithful — implying some pre- sentation of it at the time. Bells, with ropes. their Cross, for processions and for the dead. " Two Candles, or one at the least, at the tiiiieof High Mass. " A Cense pot. Font of stone, with a lock and key. II. The Old E.nolish Liturgies. 1. Sarum. 2. Bangor. 3. York. 4. Hereford. 1, 2, 3, 4. Altar. 1. Linen Cloth. 1, 2, 3, 4. Coi-poral. 2. Sudarium. 1, 2, 3, 4. Paten. 1, 2, 3, 4. Chalice. 1, 2, 3, 4. Wine and Water brought to the Priests, — imply- ing vessels in which to bring them. 1, 2, 3, 4. Bread, AVine, and Water, brought to the Priest, — implying some place from which they were brought. 1. Cross, Crucifi.x. i. Two AVax Candles in Candlesticks to be carried to the Altar steps. 1, 2, 3. Thurible. 1. Font. III. The Prayer Book 4.D. 1549. The Altar, the Lord's Table, God's board. "laying the bread upon the Corporas." ' 'Paten or some other comely thing. " Chalice or Cup. Cruets — implied in "putting the Wine into the Clialice . . . puttiug thereto a little pure andcle.an water. '' Credence — implied in "then shall the Minister take so much Bread and Wine as shall suf- fice, . . . and set- ting both the Bread and Wine upon the Altar. " Poor men's Box. Font. I\'. Inventories. 1. Winchester Cathedral, Oct. 3, 1552. 2. St. Martin, Outwich, London, Sept. 16, 1552, 3. Stanford - in - the -Vale, Berks, May 11, 1553. 1. The High Altar. 2. A Communion Table. 3. A Table with a frame. 1, 2. Cushions. 1,3. Fronts for the Altar. 2. Altar Cloth. 1. Altar Cloths, white, co- loured, plain, and diaper. 2. Table Cloths, plain and diaper. 3. Altar Cloths. 1, 3. Corporas Cloths. 1, 2, 3. Paten. 1, 2, 3. Chalice. 1, 2, 3. Cruets. Credence — unlikely to be mentioned, being com- monly structural. 3. Poor men's Box. 2, 3. Bells, in the steeple. 1 , 2, 3. Cross for the Altar. 1, 2, 3. Two Candlesticks for the Altar. 1,3. Large Candlesticks — Standards. ], 3. Censers. 1. Ship — for Incense. 1,2. Spoon — for Incense. Font — unlikely to be nien- tioued, not being move- able. More recent Authorities. 1. Canons, 1603-4. 2. Canons, 1640. 3. The Prayer Book, 1662. 1. A Communion Table. 2. An Altar. 3. The Lord's Table. [Desk or Cushion — needed for the Altar Book.] I. A carpet of silk or other decent stuff. 1. A fair Linen Cloth. 3. Fair white Linen Cloth. 3. A fair Linen Cloth for covering what remaineth of the Consecrated Ele- ments. [Mundatory — needed to wipe Chalice, etc. 3. Paten. 3. Cup or Chalice. 1. Pot or Stoup in which to bring the Wine to the Communion Table. 3. Flagon. 3. Credence — mplied in ' ' when there is a Com- munion the Priest shall then place upon the Table so much Bread and Wine as he shall think suffi- cient." 3. Bason for Alms. 1. Chest for Alms. 1, 3. Bell for the Services of the Church, and for any passing out of this hie. Cross — lawful as a decora- tive Ornament. Two Lights — the old direc- tions for them not re- pealed. Standard Candlesticks — consistent with the Ser- vices. Censer — Use of Incense never legally abolished. 1, 3. Font. 3. Vessel for Water — im- plied in " tlicn to be filled witli pure water." 3. Shell — consistent with "pour water." 1,3. Litany Desk — implied in "some convenient place" and "the place where they are accustomed to say the Litany." 1. Stall 0)- Reading-pew, to read Service in. to tbe Iprapcr IBook, 71 " Ornaments op the Church " — contimied. Images, especially of the Saint to whieli the Church is dedi- cated. Banners for Rogation Days. A Bier for the dead. II. 1, 2. Pulpit (or Am- bo) for the Epistle and Gospel. 1. Seats. 1 . Images. 1. Banners. III. Pulpit. Chair for Archbishop or Bishop. IV. 2. Cloth for the Pulpit. 2. Organs. 1 , 3. Banners. 2. HerseCIoth for burying. 1, 3. Cloths to cover and keep clean the Linen Altar Cloth. 1. .3. Pulpit. 3. Kneeling- desk — for Churohings 3. Chair for the Archbishop or Bishop. Organ — desirable. I. The Ten Command- ments. " Other chosen sentences upon thcwalls." {Dccoratii'e Ornaments.) 3. Rogation Days recog- nized. Bier — requisite. Pall — requisite. Covering for Linen Cloth — desirable. Besides the " Ornaments " contained in this List, there are many others mentioned in the Inven- tories, which are merely Ornaments " in the sense of Decorations." Such are the following : Curtains for the sides of Altars ; Hangings for the wall behind the Altar and of the Chancel ; Carjjets for the Altar steps ; Cloths and Veils for Lent. There were also " Ornaments," i.e. Articles '• used in the Services," which, tjn various grounds, are barely, or not at all, consistent with the character of the present Prayer Book Services, or with some of its directions. Thus we find : the Pyx, or Monstrance, with its covering and canopy for the Reserved Sacrament (the former of which could only be used in circumstances which really necessitated Reservation for the Sick) ; Bason and Towel for the Priest to wash his hands before Consecrating ; Sanctus, Sacring, and other Bells ; Light and Covering for the Easter Sepulchre ; Vessels for Holy Water ; the Chrismatory for the oil of Unction in Baptism and Visitation of the Sick ; the Pax for the Kiss of Peace ; the Reliquary. "ORNAMENTS OF THE MINISTERS.' Cope. Principal Mass Vest- ment. Chesible. Dalmatic (for Deacon). Tunic(for Sub-deacon). Albe. Girdle. Stole. Maniple. Amice. Surplices. II. 1, 2. Cope. 1, 2, 4. Vestment. 1, 2. Chasuble. 1 . Dalmatic. 1. Tunicle. 1, 4. Albe. 1, 2, 4. Amice. 1. Gremial(oj- Apron). 1, 2. Surplices. III. Cope. Vestment. Tunicles. Albes. Pastoral Stafr(Bp.) Rochette (Bp. ). Surplice. Hood. IV. 1, 2, 3. Cope. 2, 3. Vestment. 1, 3. Chasuble. 1, 3. Deacon((.e. Dalmatic). 1. 3. Sub-deacon [i.e. Tu- nicle). 1, 2, 3. Albes. 1, 3. Stole. 2. Auuce. 1, 3. Mitre. 1. Crosier Staff (Bp.). 1. Gloves (Bp. ). L Ring(Bp.). 2 3. Surplices. V. 1 . Cope. 3. General Rubric. "And here is to be noted, that such Ornaments of the Church, and of the Minis- ters thereof at all times of their Ministration, shall be retained and be in use as werein this Church of Eng- land by the Authority of ParUament. in the second year of the Reign of King Edward the Sixth." 3. ' ' Rochet " and the rest of the "Episcopal Habit." 1. Surplice. 1. Hood. 1. Tippet. It will be seen, by an examination of these comparative Tables of Ornaments, that very few indeed of those which are mentioned in the Inventories, the old English Canons, and the Sarum and other books, are not distinctly and by name shewn to be legally useable now if the combined authority of the Prayer Books of 1549 and 1662, together with that of the Canons of 1603 and 1640, is, as it must be, taken into account. Moreover, of those excepted, there is not one of which it can be fairly alleged that it is wholly incongruous with the letter and the spirit of those Services which, in the present Prayer Book, occupy the place of the older Services in connection with which these Ornaments were employed. If it were necessary here to resort to a further mode of jjroviug what Ornaments are now lawful 72 a IRitual JntroDiiction in the Church of England, it would be desirable to adopt the test indicated by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council as noticed at p. 68. The Judges referred to a List of Church Ornaments extracted from LjTidwood, in Bukn's Ecclesiastical Law : all which occur in one or other of three series of those old English Canons already summarized in the foregoing tables, viz. [1] Archbishop Grey's Constitutions, A.d. 1250; [2] Archbishop Pcckham's Constitutions at Lambeth, A.D. 1281; and [3] Ai-chbishop Winchelsy's Constitutions at Merton, A.D. 1305. These laws define what Ornaments the Parishioners were required to provide at those periods, and are really the basis of those Rules which professedly guide the Ecclesiastical Courts now in deciding the similar liability of Parishioners in the present day. These Constitutions are contained in Johnson'.s English Canons : and a comparison of them would shew what was considered to be generally necessary for Divine Service under the old English Rituals, and so would materially aid in determining what is legally requisite now, so far as the present Services are in unison with the ancient ones. In considering the legal requirements of the general Rubric on the Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers, it is very important to recollect that its retention in the present Book of Common Prayer was not the mere tacit permission for an existing direction to remain ; for not only (as has been already shewn at p. 64) were certain verbal changes made in the Rubric, as it had been printed in the Books of 1559 and 1604, but the question of its retention or rejection was pointedly raised by the Presb}terian party at the Savoy Conference, and was then deliberately answered by the Bishops. The Presbyterians said, " Forasmuch as this Rubric seemeth to bring back the Cope, Albe, etc., and other Vestments forbidden by the Common Prayer Book, 5 and 6 Edw. VI., and for the' reasons alleged against ceremonies imder our eighteenth general exception, we desire that it may be wholly left out." [Card- well's Conf. p. 314.] The Bishops replied, " § 2. rub. 2. For the reasons given in our answer to the eighteenth general, whither you refer us, we think it fit that the Rubric continue as it is." {Ihid. p. 351.] The " reasons " here referred to are as follows : " Prop. 18, § 1. We are now come to the main and principal demand as is pretended, viz. the abolishing the laws which impose any ceremonies, especially three, the surplice, the sign of the cross, and kneeling. These are the yoke which, if removed, there might be peace. It is to be suspected, and there is reason for it from their own words, that somewhat else pinches, and that if these ceremonies were laid aside, and these or any other prayers strictly enjoined without them, it would be deemed a burden intolerable : it seems so by No. 7, where they desire that when the Liturgy is altered, according to the rest of their proposals, the minister may have liberty to add and leave out what he pleases." [Ibid. p. 345.] In what light the excepting Ministers viewed this answer of the Bishops may be gathered irom their "Rejoinder" (London, 16G1), where, in noticing it, they reply, "We have given you reason enough against the imposition of the usual ceremonies ; and would you draw forth those absolute ones to increase the burden ?" [Documents relating to the Act of Uniformity, 1862. Grand Debate, etc., p. 118.] It is plain, therefore, that, in the judgement of the Episcopal authorities at that time, it was con- sidered desirable to legalize a provision for Ornaments which, if acted upon, would conform the appear- ance of the Churches and Services to those general features which they presented in the second year of the reign of Edward VI., i.e. as the Judicial Committee has decided, to that condition in which the first Prayer Book of Edward VI. designed to leave them. Indeed it seems highly probable that had Bishop Cosin, the chief reviser in 1661, been allowed entirely to guide his Episcopal brethren on this matter, he would have made the Rubric so detailed and explicit as to place it beyond the reach of controversy ; for, as already noticed at p. 64," in his " Particulars to he considered, explained, and corrected in the Book of Common Prayer" he says, with almost a prophetic instinct of subsequent and present controversies, " But what these Ornaments of the Church and of the Minister were, is not here specified, and they are so unknown to many, that by most they arc neglected. Wherefore it were requisite that those Ornaments, used in the second year of King Edward, should be here particularly named and set forth, that there might be no difference about them." [Cosin's ^Yorl•s, v. p. 507.] More- over, as is also mentioned in the same note, he had begun to write a List of the Ornaments, but got no further than the word " Surplice." There does not appear to be any explanation on record to shew why this suggestion, apparently so ' Cardwell prints "so our reaBons," liiit the corrected | he has written the exact words of Elizabeth's Act of Unifor- reading inserted above is that of the report entitled "The ( mity except in the slight variation "at all tinie.s of their Minis- • irand Debate," etc., p. 12. i tration," thii.s putting tlie Rubric into its jiresent form. ' Where it will be seen also th;it in his I >urli.un Pr.iyer TiooU to tf)C prapcr Vook. 73 valuable, was not acted upon. Probably the ground -which had to be recovered after fifteen years' banishment of the Prayer Book from Churches which had also been more or less despoiled of their Ornaments, combined with the extensively adverse temper of the time and its special manifestation in the Savoy Conference, warned the Bishops that an authorized catalogue (whether in the Prayer Book or elsewhere) of all the Legal Ornaments of King Edward's Second Year might raise a too formidable barrier against endeavours to restore the use of any of them at that time. And so it may have been regarded as the more prudent course only to re-establish the general rule as to the Ornaments, trusting to an improved ecclesiastical tone to develope in time its actual details. The Church Revival of the Nineteenth Century has been gradually realizing this probable expec- tation of a future developement m a way and to an extent with which no j^revious period since 1G62 can be at all compared : for, indeed, through a variety of causes, there had been a more or less continuous declension from even that standard of Ritual and Ceremonial which the Restoration 2)'>'ttctically raiaeil, though in fact it was considerably lower than the one legally prescribed. The renewed understanding and appreciation of Doctrine — especially of Sacramental Doctrine — as embodied in the Formularies and taught by old and great Divines of the Church of England ; the improved taste for Ecclesiastical Art ; the deeper sense of the reverential proprieties with which the acts of Public Worship should be sur- rounded : these and other favourable circumstances have combined, notwithstanding much indifference and opposition, to produce a reaction in favour of Ceremonial and its corresponding Accessories more extensive probably than that which arose in the time of King Charles I., and, as it may reasonably be believed, of a far more stable character. The present time, then, would seem to be a not unfavourable one for endeavouring to act upon Bishop Cosin's suggestion by specifying in this Annotated Prayer Book (though of course in a wholly unauthoritative way, except so far as the law itself is therein correctly represented), "what these Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers were " at the period referred to in the Rubric which orders that they " shall be retained, and be in use." The account already given in this Section will, it is believed, have described them with sufficient clearness and exactness : the three following Tables are designed to shew more explicitly the prescribed use or the inherent fitness of the several Ornaments in connection with those " all times of their Ministration " at which the Rubric directs the Clergy to employ them. Those which may be said to be Rubrically essential are distinguished from those which may be accounted as Rubrically suppletnental by the latter being printed in Italics. ORNAMENTS OF THE CHURCH. To be used at Mattins, Evensong, Litany, Com- mination. Holy Com- munion, Baptism, Public and Private ; Catecliizing. Matrimony. Visitation and Communion of the Sick. Churching of Women. Burial of the Dead. Altar or Lord's Table. To present her Offerings. If a Celebra- tion. Cross or Picture. To be always there, being a permanent Ornament, i.e. ] Decoration. Frontal and Super-frontal. To be always there, being the ordinary Furniture. The Two Lights. Evensong When a Cele- bration When a Cele- bration. Tlie Linen Cloth. do. Com. of Sick. do. Book lle.st or Cushion. Corporal and Case. When a Cele- bration. Com. of Sick. When a Cele- bration. Fair Linen Cloth or Veil. do. do. do. Bason for Alms, etc. do. Staiulard Candlesticks. Paten and Chalice. When a Cele- bration. Com. of Sick. When a Cele- bration. Paten for Bread to be offered. do. do. do. Flagon for Wine and Water. do. do. do. Veil (Silk) to cover Vessels. do. do. do. Linen Palls to cover Chalice. do. do. do. Mandatory. do. do. do. Censer, etc. do. Font and Vessel for Water. For Public Baptisms — some convenient vessel for Private Baptism. Bier and Pall. Processional Cross. Still retained in some Cathedrals, e.g. Chichester. Banners. For Rogation Days and special occasions. Chair For the Arch bishop or Bisl lop at Ordiuat ions and Confi miatious. 74 a IRituat JntrotJuction ORNAMENTS OF THE MINISTERS. To be used at Martins, Evensong, Litany, Corn- mi nation. Holy Com- mnnioQ. Baptism, Public and Private; Catechizing. Matrimony. Visitation and Communion of the Sick. Churching of Women. Burial of the Dead. Cope oi- Vestment Dalmatic (for Gospeller or Deacon). Tunicle (for Epistoler or Sub-deacon). Albe and Girdle. Stole. Maniple and Amice. Surplice (with Sleeves). Hood or Tippet. When a Cele- bration. do. do. do. When a Cele- bration. When a Cele- bration. do. do. do. WhenaCele bration. Rochette. Surplice or Albe. Cope or Vestment. Pastoral Staff. Gremial or Apron. Mitre and Ring. EPISCOPAL ORNAMENTS. Public Bap- tism and Catechizing. do. do. do. do. do. *,* The Episcopal Ornaments are the same for Confirmation, Ordination. Consecration of Churches and Burial Grounds : perhaps the Rubric at the end of the First Prayer Book, in directing ' ' a Surplice or Albe, and a Cope or Vestment, " may have intended the use of the Albe and Vestment when the whole Communion Service was used. In any consideration of the Ornaments to be used in Divine Service, it is not only unavoidable but important to consider such points as [1] their material, [2] their colour, [3] their form, particularly in reference to such of them as, by reason of long disuse, are but little known. The fact that those Orna- ments which have been retained in use among us do exhibit mostly their ancient material, colour, and form, except as altered, for the better or the worse, by any subsequent fashions, may fairly be taken to indicate what would have been the case with those Ornaments which have fallen into disuse : and this view is strongly confirmed by the very general preservation of these ancient characteristics in the Royal, Noble, Civic, Legislative, Judicial, Military, and Naval Ornaments which (unlike so many of the Ecclesiastical) have never ceased to be employed among us. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that, in the very extensive modem restorations which have been accomjDlished, the permanent Decorations of Churches, the Altar-plate, and Altar-coverings have decidedly followed, for the most part, the ancient patterns and models which were familiar at the period selected as the Standard in the Rubric on Ornaments. The English Church, while presenting in her Ornaments the same ordinary features which were common to the rest of Christendom, always had her own special usages, and those, too, somewhat diver- sified in details by several local varieties ; as, indeed, was and is also the case in Kingdoms or Dioceses coimected with other Branches of the Catholic Church. Though most has perished, enough remains in England of actual ancient specimens (besides the more abundant illustrations in old Illuminations) of Windows, Carvings, Monuments, Brasses, Seals, and the like, to furnish authoritative guidance, especi- ally in regard to the Form of ancient Ornaments. Moreover, in the Inventories of Church Goods, the descriptions of Material and Colour are so numerous and detailed as to supply what is, to a great extent, unavoidably lacking in these respects in the illustrations just named, owing either to the nature of them, e.g. Carvings which rarely exhibit Colours, or to errors which may be due, for instance, to the glass-painter or the illuminator who, perhaps, was at times less careful to give the actual colour of a Vestment in an Ecclesiastical Function than to furnish a picture in accordance with his own taste. The following Tables contain a summarized analysis of such contents of five Inventories as relate to the Vestments of the Ministers and the Choir, and also to the various Hangings or Articles employed in furnishing and decorating the Altars and Chancels : they are all of the date of 1552 and 1553, and so they exhibit accurately Ornaments which to tbc Iprapcr IBook. 75 were preserved in the Claivrches at the very period to whicli the Rubric on Ornaments directs atten- tion, when prescribing the general Rule as to the things which "shall be retained, and be in use" now in the Church of England. Three of these Inventories, viz. Holy Trinity Cathedral, Winchester, 1.5.52 ; St. Martin, Outwich, London, 1552-53 ; and Stanford-in-the-Vale, Berks, 1553, have been used already to illustrate other points : the two additional ones now cited are St. Paul's Cathedral, 1552, and St. Nicolas, Cole Abbey, London. 1552. [L] MATERIAL OF VESTMENTS. Cloth of Gold . 30 Sarsnett . Cloth of Silver 6 Bawdkyn Velvet 137 Damask . Satin 30 Tissue Silk . 134 Chamlett . 337 16 226 146 54 9 451 Fustian 6 Buckram . 2 Dorny.x . 8 Serge 1 Various . . 48 65 Total 853 A cursory inspection of these Lists of Ornaments shews at once that, as respects Material, the choice, while amply varied, ran very much upon the richer fabrics, whether of Home or Foreign Manu- facture ; Cloth of Gold, and Satin of Bruges, being the more costly, were, as might be expected, the most rare ; but Velvet, Satin, Silk, Bawdkyn, and the like, were not uncommonly used ; though such inferior stuffs as Taffeta, Chamlett, and Fustian often occur. The nature or quality of what was to be employed seems not to have been prescribed ; indeed, had there been a desire to do so (which is very improbable) the varying pecuniary abilities of Parishes would have made it needful to avoid any rule on the subject, except requiring them to provide according to their means the essential (and if they could any supplementary) things appeitaining to the Services of the Church. The same principle is acted upon now in the Holy Eastern Church. A Priest of that Communion informs the ^vriter that " there are no strict rules for the Material : when possible, silken and brocaded Vestments are to be preferred. Where the means are circumscribed, plain linen ones are worn, or of whatever Material, so long as it is clean, and made in the proper shape." With them doubtless it is, as the foregoing catalogue proves it to have been with us, that the instinct of natural piety, viz. the devotion of the best to God's service, is not relied upon in vain. Nor was the care and cost bestowed upon the Material limited to the foundation of the Vestments or Hangings ; embroidery of all kinds was abundantly displayed in pattern or powdering, whether in Silk or Gold (not seldom in the much- valued Gold of Venice), so that the Sacred Name, the Crucifix, the Cross, Crowns, Angels, Imagery, Eagles, Herons, Lions, Dolphins, Swans, the Sun and Moon, Stars, Wheat-sheaves, Grapes, Flowers, and the like, adorned the Fabrics of which the Vestures were made ; or composed the rich Orphreys, which were rendered all the more beautiful and costly by Pearls and Precious Stones ; as though the donors desired to attain in the adornments of the Sanctuary to somewhat of the fiilness of meaning contained in the Psalmist's words, " The king's daughter is all glorious within : her clothing is of wrought gold. She shall be brought unto the king in raiment of needlework " [Ps. xlv. 13, 14]. [II.] So, again, as to Colour: the Inventories now under examination shew it to have been chiefly of six kinds, viz. White, Red, Blue, Green, Yellow, and Black ; besides various combinations of all these. The proportions in which they existed are shewn in the following Table of Vestments which were in the five Churches at the date of the Inventories : — COLOURS OF VESTMENTS. Wliite. Hed. Blue. Green. Yellow. Black. Variorts. Totals. Cope3 .... 121 107 83 40 20 13 75 459 Chasubles 28 34 24 10 7 15 37 155 Dalmatics oo 33 23 6 6 13 13 116 Tunicles .... 22 24 27 6 6 12 26 123 Totals 193 198 157 62 39 53 151 853 It may be as well to remark here that all the Green Vestments in this list belonged to the two Cathedral Churches, except one Chasuble, Dalmatic, and Tunicle, which were in St. Martin, Outwich. Green occurs much less frequently than other colours : it was an Exeter colour, and is also found 1^ a iaitual IntroDuction in Lists of Vestments belonging to the Northern Province ; but there seems very little to indicate with any certainty when it was used, though perhaps it served for ordinary week-days, especially in Trinity-tide. So, acrain, with regard to Blue: while it appears to have been a much more usual colour, it is often very uncertain what kind of Blue is meant, whether Cerulean or some darker shade ; frequently indeed the latter is indicated by the words " blodium " and " iudicus," which mean a sort of hyacinthine and darker blue ; but these must not be confounded with Purple, which is also found in the same or other Lists. The occasions, however, on which Blue or Purple was employed are somewhat conjectural, though there is more to guide : light Blue seems sometimes to have been used in Commemorations of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and a somewhat darker shade is to be seen in Illuminations of about the Fifteenth Centurj', in Copes used at Funerals. A similar variety is found, both as to material and colour, in the Coverings and Hangings used for the Altars and Chancels : the annexed list exhibits their Colours : — GoW. Blue. Green. White. Bed. Slack. Various. Altar Coverings Altar Hangings Altar Curtains . Chancel Hangings 3 3 11 1 6 2 6 6 s 18 S 4 2 6 I 5 2 2 4 22 9 10 Totals 6 20 ■20 32 15 S 41 Besides the colours already enumerated, others are sometimes mentioned, such as Brown, TaA\Tiey, Murrey, Pink, and Cheyney — perhaps Chestnut; also combinations of colours, viz. Red and Green, Paly of White and Green, Red and White, Blue and White, Blue and Yellow, White and Red chequered. These different colours, or mixtures of colours, are to be found alike in Vestments of the Ministers, or of the Altars, no less than in the Hangings of the Churches. It is worth noticing that the more usual Ecclesiastical colours are those which may be especially accounted the Colours of England — Red, White, and Blue — being combined in the National Flag, and designating the Admirals of this Country's Fleets : possibly the close, though curious and apparently untraceable, relations which for several centuries subsisted between the Church and the Navy,^ in the Admiralty and Ecclesiastical Courts, may have tended to perpetuate this correspondence. It may also be mentioned, as probably indicating the effect which Ecclesiastical customs produced or helped to per- petuate, that Red, Violet, and Black are mentioned as colours worn on the Judicial Bench, according to the Term, in some Regulations made by the Judges in 1635. [Gent. Mag. Oct. 1768.] Green, also, appears to have been at one time a favourite colour with them. Moreover, the retention of Red, PurjDle, and Green — and especially the prevalence of Red — in the rich and decent, no less than (as was once too common) in the miserable and dirty coverings of handsome or unsightly Altar-tables in the churches, are in all likelihood the traditional use of these same colours which formerly were more com- monly and more variously employed in the Services of the Church of England, and that, too, not without regard to some written or unwritten rale as to the Services and Seasons at which they should be used. That a desire has long existed, and increases, again to adopt a greater variety of colour in the Ornaments of the Church, and especially in the coverings of the Altar, is plain from what has been accomplished and is still doing: one object of this wished-for variety is the very useful one of dis- tinguishing, and so teaching, by outward tokens, the changes of the Church Seasons and the occurrence of Ecclesiastical Holydays. For lack of any existing rule on this subject in the Church of England, the rule of the rest of the Western Church has not unnaturally been followed in many cases, especially as the ancient English rule or practice was either not at all known, or not easily to be collected, even by those who were aware that some leading points of it were to be found without much difficulty. As the need of some guide in this matter is becoming more general, it may not be without a really practical use to compare the old English rules with those of the Roman and the Eastern Churches : by doing this a somewhat uniform principle will probably be found, sufficient also to furnish a general rule for those who, while rightly wishing to be not out of harmony with the rest of Christendom, would with equal propriety prefer to follow any older practice of the Church of England which would afford a satisfactory direction in the absence of any definite rule authorized by living Ecclesiastical Authority. The Roman rule is laid down with precision : the old English rule can be ascertained with a near ' Dyer mentions that in Spain Philip II. brought naval matters before tlic Inqninitinn, ami that Don IVilro, Arch- bishop of Toltilo, was High Admiral c 'f Tastilo " by a then not uncommon union of offices." [Dyer'.s Moilerii Eurojir, p. ISO] to tfje lpmj)ci- 15oob. // approach to accuracy, from the ancient Service-books, St. Osmund's Register, and the Inventories of Church goods. The Eastern Church, as a learned Priest of it states, does not give " in her Ritual books " any such " minute rules with regard to the colours of the Vestments, as are to be found in the Western Ritual. The Church enjoins her ministers to care more for the simple purity and propriety of the vestments than for their richness. In those cases where means are at hand, she bids the ministers to wear richer vestments of any colour for the joyful seasons of the year, and Black or Red ones for the times of fasting and sorrow. Thus, in Passion Week, and Great Lent, at Burials, etc.. Black or Purple Vestments are worn. It is customary to wear White Silk Vestments (if possible) at Epiphany and Easter." In this description of the general and unspecific character of the Eastern rule, there is a considerable correspondence with the features of the Sarum rule just noticed. The following Table may be considered as furnishing a fairly trustworthy view of these three Rules : — COMPARATIVE TABLE OF COLOURS ACCORDING TO THE ENGLISH, ROMAN AND EASTERN USE. Seasons. Advent — Sundays ,, Ferial . . . . Christmas Eve . ,, Octave St. Stephen St. John Evangelist Innocents ,, Octave . . . . VI. dies Natalis . . . . The rest of Christmas-tide . Circumcision . . . . Epiphany Octave . . . . The rest of the Season . Septuagesima to Easter — Sundays „ „ Ferial Ash Wednesday . Midlent ("Laeban ") Maundy Thur.sday Good Friday Easter Eve . Easter . Low Sunday Invention of the Cross Martyrs in Paschal-tide Rogation Days Vigil of Ascension Ascension Octave . The rest of the Season Vigil of Pentecost Whitsuntide Vigil of Holy Trinity i 13 ENGLISH. EOlV Salisbury. g London, Innocent < Earlv, Late, York. Wf.lls. 1406-20. III , a Uth-12th century. 15Ui-16th century. d. 1216. Violet. Red. Red. Red.' "Omnia media. " Violet or Purple. Black. Violet. Red. Purple (?). White. White. 3 "Omnia media." Violet or Purple. Black. White. Red. White. Red.*' White. White. White. Red. Red. Red.i Red. Red. White. White. Red.i "Media et alba." White. Red. Red. Red.' Red. Violet or Purple. Red. Red. Red. White. Red. White. Red. White (?). White. 3 White. Red. White (?). Red.' Red and White. White. White. Red. White (?). White. Red.' White. White. White. Red. Green or Green. Yellow. Violet. Red. Red. Blue. 2 Red. Violet or Purple. Black. Violet. Red. Red or Purple. White. 3 Violet or Purple. Black. Violet. Red. Red. Red.* Violet or Purple. Black. Violet. Red. Red. Blue. Red. Violet or Purple. Violet. Black. Red. Red. Red. 3 Red (a white banner). White. Black. Black. Red.« Red. Red. Red and Purple. Red or Black. Black. Black or Red. Red. Red.** Red. White. White. Red. White. White. White. Red.' Red. White. White. White. White. White. White. White. White. White. Red. Red. Red.' Red. Red. White. White. White. Red. Red. White. Purple or Violet. White. White. Red.' White. White. White. White. White (?). White.' White. White or Red. 4 Red Red. Red. White or Red.+ Red. Red' Red. Red. Red. Green. 1 Red. Red. Red. Red. Modern. Violet. Violet. White. White. Red. White. Violet (Red if Sunday). White. White. White. White. Green. Violet. Violet. Violet. Rose or Violet. Violet. Black. Violet (W.Mass). White. White Red. Red. Violet. Wliite. White. Violet (Red at Mass). Red. Red. * White was prescribed at York for the Christmas Mhsn in aurora, and for offices of Palm Simday and Easter F,ve. + Symbolical of the Pentecostal fire. ' For numbered footnotes, fee p. 73. 78 a Jaitual :jntroDuction Comparative Table of Coloors according to the English, Roman, and Eastern Use — continited. Seasons. Trinity Sunday .... Corpus Christi .... After Trinity — Sundays ,, Ferial . Transfiguration and M. Holy Name Holy Cross Feasts of Blessed Virgin ilary Michaelmas Apostles — out of Easter St. John, Port Latin . Conversion of St. Paul . St. Peter ad Vincula . St. John Baptist — Nativitj' . ,, Decollation Evangelist — out of Easter . Martyrs .... Confessors .... Bishops Doctors Virgin not Martyr — Matron AH Saints All Souls Ember Days (out of Whitsuntide) VigU . . . Dedication Octave Relics Marriage Funeral of an Innocent Mass of Dead Office of Dead Processions 2; ENGLISH. S.lLISBUKy. < Early, Late, & llth-]2tU loth-llitli century. century. Red. Red. Red. Red. Red. Red. Green (?). Red. White (?). Red. Red. No pre- White. White or cise prac- Blue(?). tical rule White. White. can be given for Red. Red. these: the White. Red. general Red. White (?) principle Red. Red. which regulates Red. Red.' the col- Red. Red. our for Red. Red. seasons Red. Red. applies to Yellow. Yellow. Festivals which Yellow(?). are ob- served Yellow(?). by the Eastern White. White. Church. Red. Red (?). Purple (?). Black. Red [so in Chichele's Pontif.] AVhite. White. White (?). White (?). Black(?). Purple. Blue. Black. Red. York. Red.i Red.' Red.' Green. ^ R«d.' Blue(?).= White.= Eed.i Red.1 Blue(?).> Blue. 2 Red. Red.1 Blue. 2 Red.i Blue. Blue. Red. Blue.^ Red.1 Black. Red(?). Red.' Green. ^ Purple. Blue or Purple. Blue. Wells. Red. Red. Red. Red.'« Red. White. Blue and White. Red. White. Red. Green and Yellow. Blue. Red. Red." Red.'-^ Blue and Green. Green and Yellow. Green and Yellow. White. Red and White. Black. I "Media et alba. " Red and White. Black. Black. IvOSDON, 1406-21). ROMAN. Innocent III., d. 1216. White. White. Green or YeUow. Green or Yellow. Red. White. White. Red. Red(?). Red(?). ■UTiite. not Red. Red. Red. Yellow. White. White. ■■>, Black. Black. Purple or Violet. White.' Black. Black. Black. Green(?) Green. Modern. Wliite. White. Green. Green. White. Red. White. White. Red. Red. White. White. White. Red. Red. Red. White. White.' White White. White. Violet. Violet. Violet. White. White. Black. Black. Black. Violet. III. Having thus given some description of the Material and Colour of the "Ornaments of the Ministers," their Form may be understood by means of the accompanying descriptions and illustra- tions. The symbolical meanings which are added to the former are taken from the " Book of Ceremonies" or "Rationale," drawn up under the direction of Archbishop Cranmer in the year 1.542. The original manuscript of this " Rationale," occasionally corrected by Cranmer's own hand, is preserved in the British Museum [Cleop. E. 5, fol. 259 sqq.], and it may also be found in print in (Collier's ' It appears from inventories, etc. (noted by Canon Sim- mons and Dr. Henderson), that in tlioso instances at Yorh Blue was used for lieil at some altars in the fourteenth nnd fif- teenth centuries. 2 White for P.luc at some ill-furnished altars in York: ^ Green, ihtd. * White or (!reen. ihiil. ' Red or Blue, iliid. « At IIiTcfnril, as in other Englisli uses, the Hed Chasuble w,a9 changed for tlie Black Co|)e for the latter part of Good Friday Service. At I'nrh Brown, or Bl.ack with Red Orphroya, w.is used in I'.issiontide. The; WiV.< Ordinal I)rescril)e3 a Black (^'ope for the impersonator of Caiaphas as the one exception to the rule fur Red. ' At Lhirnln, which otherwi.io followed Sarum, White was used on the Nativity of St. John the Baptist. This was also the Piirisian colour, and it appears in Archbishop Chichele's Pontifical in the Libraiy of Trin. Coll. Camb. Purple M'as used at Lincoln by tlie celebrant in solemn obsequies about 1.3.)0. ^ .Some OalUcan uses have Green for Bishops and Violet for Abbats. " At Exeter (where Bishop Oraudisson in 1.340 adopted the London, Canterbury, or Mediaeval Roman sequence) any colour ml libitum was admitted on All Saints, Feast of Relics, and Dedication of a Church. '" But these are described as the days of Sixtus and Donatus. " Unfortunately a blank is left in the Wells Ordinal against St. Luke's Day. '= The Wel'ln rule (printed by Mr. H. E. Reynolds, 1881) gives for a Virgin not Martyr \Vhiti' and l!ed. to tlje ll^rapec IBook. 79 Ecclesiastical History, v. 104, ed. 1852, and in Strype's Ecclesiastical Memorials, I. ii. 411, ed. 1822. The full title of the work is " Ceremonies to be used in the Church of England, together with an Explanation of the Meaning and Significancy of them." The Ornaments mentioned in the " Rationale " are those only which are worn by the Celebrant at the Altar, and are as follows : [1] The Amice ; [2] the Albc ; [3] the Girdle ; [4] the Stole ; [5] the Phanon, i.e. the Maniple or Sudarium as it was also called ; [G] the Chasuble. The Rubric in the Prayer Book of 1549 specifies only — [1] the Albe ; [2] the Vestment or Cope ; [3] the Tunicle ; but, of course, it does not exclude the others named in the " Rationale," and, in fact, the whole were in use under the First Prayer Book. These two lists, then, comprise eight Ornaments which are now to be described. 1. The Amice, Amictus (the Armenian VaJcass and, perhaps, the Eastern Omophdrion seem to correspond to this, especially the former). — This is a broad and oblong piece of Linen with two strings to fasten it ; in its more ornate form it is embroidered on the outer edge with a rich fillet or otherwise adorned. When used it is first placed on the head, then slipped down to and worn on the shoulders beneath the Albe ; so that, when left somewhat loose, it has the appearance of an ornamental collar as shewn in the drawing, Plate II. The " Rationale " says : " He putteth on the Amice, which, as touching the Mystery, signifies the veil with the which the Jews covered the face of Christ, when they buffeted Him in the time of His Passion. And as touching the Minister, it signifies faith, which is the head, ground, and foundation of all virtues ; and therefore, he puts that upon his head first." 2. The Albe, Alba (the Eastern StoicJiarion and the Russian Podriznik). — This is a loose and long garment coming down to the feet and having close-fitting sleeves reaching to the hands. Anciently it appears to have been made usually of Linen, though in later times rich Silks of different colours were frequently used, while in the Russian Church Velvet is often employed. It was very commonly ornamented with square or oblong pieces of Embroidery called Apparels ; these were stitched on or otherwise fastened to various parts of it, especially just above the feet and near the hands, where they had somewhat the appearance of cuffs. The Rubric of 1549 directs the use of "a white Albe plain ; " this may have meant a Linen Albe without Apparels, yet Silk or similar material seems not to be forbidden provided it be white : Embroidery, such as shewn in the sketch, Plate I., appears sufficiently " plain " to be consistent with the language and intention of the Rubric. Old-fashioned Surplices are always thus ornamented about the .shoulders, a tradition of ancient custom. The " Rationale " says of the Minister that " he puts upon him the Albe, which, as touching the Mystery, signifieth the white garment wherewith Herod clothed Christ in mockery when he sent Him to Pilate. And as touching the Minister, it signifieth the pui'eness of conscience, and innocency he ought to have, especially when he sings the J\lass." The Surplice, Superpelliceutn, Plate II. (whether with or without Sleeves;, and the Rochet, Rochdum, being both of them only modifications of the Albe, this language of the " Rationale " respecting it appears to apply equally to them. 3. The Girdle, Cingidum (the Eastern Poi/ass). — This is a Cord or narrow band of Silk or other material (usually white) with Tassels attached ; or, as in the Eastern Church, a broad Belt (often of rich material) with a clasp, hooks, or strings. It is used for fastening the Albe round the waist. The " Rationale " thus explains it : " The Girdle, as touching the Mystery, signifies the scourge with which Christ was scourged. And as touching the Minister, it signifies the continent and chaste living, or else the close mind which he ought to have at prayers, when he celebrates." 4. The Stole, Stola (the Eastern Ppitrachelion of the Priest, the Orarion of the Deacon, the Lention of the Sub-deacon). — This is a strip of Silk about three inches wide, and about eight and a half feet long ; it may be plain or richly ornamented ; especially at the ends, of which examples are given in Plate II. The Priest wears it hanging over his neck, and when he celebrates it is usuallv crossed on the breast and passed under the Girdle : the Deacon wears it suspended over the left shoulder ; but, when assisting at the Celebration, he often has it brought across his back and breast and fastened at his right side. As used by the Greek Priest it has the appearance of two Stoles joined together, the upper end having a hole through which the head is put, and thus it hangs down in front. The " Rationale " says thus of it : " The Stole, as touching the Mystery, signifieth the ropes or bands that Christ was bound with to the pillar, when He was scourged. And as touching the Minister, it signifieth the yoke of patience, which he must bear as the servant of God." 5. The ^r.wiPLE, ]\[fnripvh(f:. sometiinos called Fanon or Phanon and Svdariuw (the Easteni 8o a iaitual JntroDuction to tf)e Iprapcr 15oofe Epimanikia aud the Russian Pdrutchi; each of these are, however, a kind of Cuffs worn on both hands). — Originally it appears to have been a narrow strip of Linen, usually as wide as a Stole and about two and a half feet long [sec Plate II.], and seems to have been employed as a kind of Sudarium for wiping the hands and for other cleanly purposes, whence it probably took one of its names. Sub- sequently, however, it became a mere ornament, being made of rich materials and often embroidered, or even enriched with jewels. It hangs over the left arm of the Celebrant and his assistants ; it should be fastened near the wrist, in a loop, to prevent its falling off The " Rationale " describes its meaning together with the Stole in these words : " In token whereof " {i/e,. of patience), "he puts also the Phanon on his arm, which admonisheth him of ghostly strength and godly patience that he ought to have, to vanquish and overcome all carnal infirmity. 6. The Chasuble or Vestment, Casnhc (the Eastern Pkelonion and the Russian Phclonc or Phcelonion). — This vesture is worn over the Albe : originally it was nearly or entirely a circular gar- ment, ha%'ing an opening in the centre through which the head of the wearer passed ; and thus it fell gracefull}' over the shoulders and arms, covering the entire person in its ample folds and reaching nearly to the feet both before and behind : at a later period it was made narrower at the back and front by reducing its circular fonn, and so it frequently terminated like a reversed pointed arch ; the sleeve part also became shorter, reaching only to the hands, and thus avoiding the need of gathering it up on the arms. Ultimately, whether from economy, or bad taste, or supposed convenience, the sleeve parts were cut away to the shoulders in the Latin Communion ; and even the Russian vestment has been so much reduced in the front that it covers little more than the chest : however, the older form has been for the most part retained in the rest of the Eastern Communion. The dra%ving on Plate I. shews the form which prevailed in the Church of England prior to the Reformation ; it has the merit of being both elegant and convenient. The same picture shews the mode of ornamenting it, namely, by embroidering the collar and outer edge, and by attaching to it what is called the Y Orphrey ; though very commonly the Latin Cross, and sometimes the Crucifixion, was variously embroidered on the back, only the perpendicular Orphrey (or Pillar, as it is tenned) being affixed in the front. The " Rationale " is thus given : " The overvesture, or Chesible, as touching the Myster}', signifieth the purple mantle that Pilate's soldiers put upon Christ after that they had scourged Him. Aud as touching the Minister, it signifies charity, a virtue excellent above all other." 7. The Cope, Cappa (the Armenian Phelonion is a similar Vestment, and is used instead of the Chasuble). — It is a kind of full, long Cloke, of a semicircular shape, reaching to the heels, and open in front, thus leaving the arms free below the elbows. Most commonly it has a Hood, as shewn in the drawing, Plate II. ; where also is represented the Orphrey and an illustration of the mode of enriching the material by embroidery. The mode of fastening it by a Band, to which is often attached a rich ornament, called the Morse, is there also exhibited. It is worn over either the Albe or the Surplice. The " Rationale " does not mention it ; probably because it was not one of the Eucharistic Vestments then or previously in use. But that it might be used at the Altar (though probably not by the Cele- brant when consecrating the Oblations) is plain from the fact that the Rubric of 1549 in naming " Vestment or Cope," apparently allows a choice between it and the Chasuble ; but it may only have been intended that, in a place where both are provided, the Chasuble alone should be worn where the whole Eucharistic Service was used ; for a Rubric at the end of the Service specifies the Cope as the Vestment to be employed at those times when only the earlier portion of the Service is intended to be said, no Consecration being designed because of its being known that there would " be none to com- municate with the Priest." The 24th Canon of 1G03 does indeed recognize the Cope as the Celebrant's Vestment to be used in Cathedrals ; but the Rubric of 1662, having later and larger authority, seems to point to the Chasuble of the Book of 1 549 as the Vestment in which to consecrate. 8. The TuNiCLE, Tunica; also called, as worn by the Deacon or Gospeller, Dalmatic, Dahnatica Cthe Eastern Stoicharion or Saectts of the Deacon). — This is a kind of loose coat or frock, reaching below the knees, open partially at the lower part of the sides; it has full, though not largo, sleeves; in material and colour it should correspond with the Chasuble. Examples of its Orphreys and of the mode of embroidering it are shewn in the two illustrations on Plate I. The Deacon's Dalmatic was usually .somewhat more ornamented in the Western Church than was the Tunicle worn by the Sub- deacon or Ejiistoler. This ornament, like the Cope, is not mentioned in the " Rationale " probably because, as was observed above, only the Vestments of the Celebrant are there .specified. THE BOOK OF And Administration Of the SACRAMENTS, AND OTHER RITES AND CEREMONIES Of the CHURCH, According to the Use Of the CHURCH of ENGLAND; Together with the PSALTER or PSALM 8 OP DAVID, Pointed as they are to he Sung or Said in CHURCHES; AND THE FORM OR MANNER OP Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating OF BISHOPS, PRIESTS, AND DEACONS. Cbc Citic anD tbc THE TITLE OF THE PKAYER BOOK. Common Prayer] This familiar term seems first to have been used authoritatively in a rubric to the English Litany of 1544: " It is thought convenient in this Common Prayer of Procession to have it set forth and used in the Vulgar Tongue, for stirring the people to more devotion." It is again found in the Injunctions of Edward VI., issued in 1546-7. But it is a very ancient term, being found in use as far back as a.d. 252, in St. Cyprian's Treatise on the Lord's Prayer ; of which he writes, " Piihlica i'st nobis et Conwiunis Oratio." Common Prayer and Ptthlic Prayer are not theologically identical, although the terms are used in the same legal sense in the respective titles of the two Acts of L'niforniity. In an exact sense. Common Prayer is defined by the authoritative words of our Lord, " Where two or three are gathered together in My Name, there am I in the midst of theia." [Matt, xviii. 20.] The Name of God is an expression used witli great frequency in Holy Scripture to denote the aulhorily of God ; in the same manner as we saj", that the oflicial agents of the Sovereign act in the Xame of the Sovereign, when they engage in the duties of their office. To be met together in the Name of Christ is to be met together under His authority, not as an accidental or promiscuous assembly ; and officially, that is, in the presence and with the aid of His autliorized agents. Thus, true Common Prayer is that which is offered in Divine Service in the Church, by a Bishoj) or Priest (or a Deacon as locum tenens in some cases), in the presence and with the aid of three, or at least two other Christian persons. Such prayer presujjposes a reverent assent to our Lord's appli- cation of the words, "My House ^ shall be called the house of prayer," and to those already quoted. To it also may be applied the words of St. Cj^jrian :- "They continued with one accord in prayer, manifesting at the same time the instancy of their praying, and the agreement. Because God, who ' maketh men to be of one mind in an house, ' admits into the house divine and eternal those only among whom is unanimous praj'er. " This kind of prayer is therefore the highest kind of all. Other prayer is exalted in kind, and probablj' in efficacy, in proportion as it connects itself with that which is Common ; as it is offered in that sense in which we are taught to say Our Father ; as it is offered under the conviction that Christian individuals stand not alone, each one for himself before God, but are parts of one Body whereof all the mem- bers are in comnmnion one with another through the One Intercessor of Whom the ministers of the Church are the earthly representatives. and administration of the Sacraments'] This does not exclude the Sacraments from Common Praijer. The corporate work of the Church is distinctly recognized in the administration of Baptism, and the Holy Communiou is the root and apex of Common Prayer. But it puts forward prominently the idea of a never-ceasing round of Divine Service as distinguished from the occasional (however frequent) offering of the Holy Eucharist. otlier rites and ceremonies of the Church] These words claim, as a matter of course, that tlie substance of the Prayer Book is in accordance with tlie theological and devotional system of the Catholic Church : and, in connection with those which immediately follow, they plainly enunciate the principle set forth more at large in the Thirty-fourth Article of Religion, that while that system is binding on tlie whole Church, yet particular Churches have a right to carry it out in their own way, according to their own "use" as to detail and ceremonial.' > T» Kupiicxit, Kyrkc, Churcli, tho House of the Lord. 2 On the. Lord's Prayer, iv. 3 Thft i>liraac " Rites nnd Cereinnnios" is not at all ctmlvalciit to our modern words Ritual and Ceremonial: but refers to the minor services of the Clinrch, such as the Commin.i*) jii. ortne Churching of Women. Arch- liishop Cranmer's fourth article of 1536 is ;t ;;ood illustration of the meaning IntcndfMl : " IV. Of Rites and Cereinoin'es. i\s vestments in God's service : sprinkling holy water; giving holy bread; bearing candles on Candlemas Uay: giving of nshc.s on Ash Wednesday: bearing of palms on Palm Kunday ; creeping to the Cross, and kissing it. and offering unto Christ before the same on Good Friday ; setting up the sejiulehre of Christ; h.al- Jowing the font, and other like exorcisms, and benedictions, and laudable euHtoins : that these arc not to be cond«mned and cist away, but continued, according to the use of tlie Church of Emjland] This right v.'as actrd iij'.on so freely in ancient days that there was a con- siderable variation in the details and ceremonial of Divine Service as it was celebrated in dill'crent parts of England. Each Prayer Book took its name from the place of its origin, and was thus called the " York use," the " Bangor use," the "Hereford use," the "Salisbury use," and so forth: but when uniformity of Common Prayer was established upon the basis of these old service-books, one "itse" Only retained its authority, that of the Church of England. In modern Prayer Books the words "the United Church of England and Ireland " were, during about seventy years, substituted for tlie words "the Church of England," under an Order of Council, dated January 1, 1801 ; but such an exercise of the Koyal authority goes beyond that permitted by the Act of Uniformity ; and the change was very misleading. ■* The two Churches are, and always have been, in communion with each other, the interchange of friendly relations has always been very free, and they have been united in a comnum political bond since 1801. The formularies of the Church of England have also been adopted in the Church of Ireland, but a false gloss was put upon the real title of the Prayer Book when it was printed in the unjustifiable form referred to. The Church of England can alter its own "use," and so can the Church of Ireland, but neither can control the customs of tlie other : and, in fact, there are some important variations in the Praj'er Books of the two countries which make the expression "the use of the United Church of England and Ireland" a misnomer. The Prayer Book as it now exists is an adaptation of ancient formularies made by the Church of England alone. Its adop- tion by other Churches cannot alter the fact, and therefore cannot justly influence the title. However much it may be adopted therefore in Ireland, .Scotland, and other possessions of the English crown, America, the Book of Common Praj'er is still " according to tlie use of the Church of England."^ But it is also to be observed that the Irish Act of Uni- formitj' is entitled ' ' An Act for the Uniformity of . . . in the Church of Ireland :^' the declaration of assent and consent is to "The Book entitled. The Book of Common Praj'er . . . according to the Use of the Church of Ireland ; " and so the title is recited throughout the Act. together with the Psalter] In the earlier Prayer Books the Psalter was printed with a separate Title-page, as distinct from the Services. The first of Bishop Cosin's "Directions to be given to the Printer," is also, "Set a fair Frontispiece at the beginning of the Book, and another before the Psalter ; to be designed as the Archbishop shall direct, and after ,to be cut in brass." Such an engraved Title-page is affixed to the Sealed Books, and a proof copy is bound up \iith Cosin's own volume : but that to the Psalter was not provided. The Ordinal was bound up with the Praj'er Book for the first time in l(i61. The following Tables will illustrate some of the preceding remarks, and shew at a glance what changes have been authorized. The Table of the Contents of the Prayer Book is not in itself of much interest, but it has been so freelj' handled by modern printers th;it a \\ ork like the present cannot go forth without an accurate cojjj' of the authorized form. The successive changes made in it have a certain interest, and they are therefore arranged in parallel columns on the oppo- site page. There is thus given also a sort of l>ird's-ej'e view of the Historj' of the Prayer Book. to put us in remembrance of spiritual things. But that none of these cere- monies have power to remit sin." [Strvpk s Memorials of Craiimerj i, Sli, Eccl. Hist. Soc. ed.) A rubric at the end of the Elizabethan Prayer Books enjoins also that " every jtarishioncr .',hall communicate at the least three times in the year, of which Easter to be one, and shall also receive the Sacraments and other Rites according to the order in this book api>ointed." * The Act of Uniformity empowers the Sovereign to alter the names of the King, Queen, and Royal Family, as occasion shall require; but to alter the name of the Church itself was a very different thing. In Marriage Licences, and in Letters of Orders, the old form was used: but in many docu- ments the alteration had been adoi)ted. 11 is right to areviously enacted : every Curate reading this Act on one Sunday in every quarter of a year; and enforcing the duty of Common I'rayer in an exhortation to his people. Both these Acts of Uniformity were repealed in 1553, and the authority of Parliament consequently withdrawn from both tho Prayer Books, by the third Act of ParliamtMit jiassed after Queen Mary's aceession (1 Mar. sess. 2, c. 2J. Jiut this " htatuto of Repeal, and every thing therein con- tained, only concerning the said Book," was made "void and of none effect" by the Elizabethan Act of Uniformity: the second book (subjeet to the nltenitions made in it by Elizabeth's Commissioners) being thus revived, but not eitlnr of the sl.itntcs themselves. Tho Act of Mary's reign was, liowfver, entirely repeated by 1 James I. c. 'J.'i, ami thus tho two Acts of Edward were revived. They are also said to be made periietual by 5 Anne, c. 5, and in the authoritative list of the statutes published in the year 1870 they arc set down as still in force. acts of Qniformitg. 85 [2] And further be it Enacted by the Queens Highness, Mrith the assent of the Lords and Commons of this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, That all, and singular Ministers in any Cathedral, or Parish- Church, or other place within this Realm of Emjland, Wahs, and the Marclies of the same, or other tlie Queens Dominions, shall from and after the Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next coming, be bounden to say and use the Matteus, Evensong, celebration of the Lords Supper, and administra- tion of each of tlie Sacraments, and all other Common and open Prayer, in such order and form as is mentioned in the said Book, so Authorized by Parliament in the said fifth and sixth year of the Reign of King Eihoard the Sixth ; with one alteration, or addition of certain Lessons to be used on every Sunday in the year, and the form of the Letauy altered, and corrected, and two sentences only added in the delivery of the Sacrament to the Communicants, and none other, or otherwise : and. That if any manner of Parson, Vicar, or other whatsoever Minister, that ought or should sing, or say Com- mon Prayer mentioned in the said Book, or minister the Sacraments, from, and after the Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next coming, refuse to use the said Common Prayers, or to minister the Sacraments in such Cathedral, or Parish-Church, or other places, as he should use to minister the same, in such order and form, as they be mentioned, and set forth in the said Book, or shall wilfully, or obstinately standing in the same, use any other Rite, Ceremony, Order, Form, or manner of celebrating of the Lords Supper openly, or privily, or Mattens, Even song, administration of the Sacra- ments, or other open Prayers, than is mentioned, and set forth in the said Book, [Ojien Prayer in, and throwjh this Act, is meant that Prayer, lohich is for other to come unto, or hear, either in Common Churches, or private Cliajypels, or Oratories, commonly called the Service of the Church] or shall preach, declare, or speak any thing in the derogation, or depraving of the said Book, or any thing therein contained, or of any part thereof, and shall be thereof lawfully convicted, according to the Laws of this Realm, by verdict of twelve men, or by his own confession, or by the notorious evidence of the fact ; shall lose, and forfeit to the Qiieens Highness, Her Heirs, and Successors, for his first offence, the profit of all his Spiritual Benefices, or Promotions, coming, or arising in one whole year next after his conviction : And also tliat the person so convicted shall for the same offence suffer imprisomnent by the space of six moneths, without Bail, or Mainprise : And if any such person, once convict of any offence concerning the premisses, shall after his first conviction, eftsoons offend, and be thereof in form aforesaid lawfully convict ; That then the same person shall for his second offence suffer imprisonment by the space of one whole year, and also shall therefore be deprived ipso facto of all his Spiritual Promotions ; and. That it shall be lawful to all Patrons, or Donors of all and singular the same Spiritual Promotions, or any of them, to present, or collate to the same, as though the person or per- sons so offending were dead : and That, if any such person, or persons, after he shall be twice convicted in form aforesaid, shall offend against any of the premisses the third time, and shall be thereof, in form aforesaid, lawfully convicted ; That then the person so offending, and convicted the third time shall be deprived ijKO facto of all his Spiritual Promotions, and also shall suffer imprisonment during his life : And if the person, that shall offend, and be convict in form aforesaid, concerning any of the premisses, shall not be Beneficed, nor have any Spiritual Promotion ; That then the same Person, so offending, and convict, shall for the first offence suffer imprisonment during one whole year next after his said con- viction, without Bail or Mainprise : And if any such person not having any Spiritual Promotion, after his first convic- tion, shall eftsoons offend in any thing concerning the premisses, and shall in form aforesaid be thereof lawfully convicted ; That then the same person sliall for liia second offence suffer imprisonment during his life. [3] And it is Ordained, and Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, Tliat if any person, or persons whatsoever, after the said Feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist next coming, shall in any Enterludes, Playes, Songs, Rimes, or by other open words declare, or sjjeak any tiling in the deroga- tion, depraving, or despising of the same Book, or of any thing therein contained, or any part tliereof, or shall by open fact, deed, or by open threatnings compel, or cause, or other- wise procure, or maintain any Parson, Vicar, or other Minister in any Cathedral, or Parish-Church, or in Chappel, or in any other Place, to sing, or say any Common, or open Prayer, or to miuister any Sacrament otherwise, or in any other manner, and form, than is mentioned in the said Book ; or that by any of the said means shall unlawfully interrupt, or let any Parson, Vicar, or other Minister in any Catliedral, or Parish- Church, Chappel, or any other place to sing or say Common and open Prayer, or to minister the Sacraments, or any of them, in such manner, and form, as is mentioned in the said Book ; That then every such person, being thereof lawfully convicted in form abovesaid, shall forfeit to the Queen our Soveraign Lady, Her Heirs, and Successors for the first offence an hundred marks : And if any person, or persons, being once convict of any such offence, eftsoons offend against any of the last recited offences, and shall in form aforesaid be thereof lawfully convict ; That then the same person, so offending and convict, shall for the second offence forfeit to the Queen our Soveraign Lady, Her Heirs, and Successors Four hundred marks : And if any person, after he in form aforesaid shall have been twice convict of any offence con- cerning any of the last recited offences, shall offend the third time, and be thereof in form abovesaid lawfully convict ; That then every person, so offending and convict, shall for his third offence forfeit to our Soveraign Lady the Queen all his Goods and Chattels, and shall suffer imprisonment during his life : And if any person or persons, that for his first offence concerning the premisses, shall be convict in form aforesaid, do not pay the sum to be paid by vertue of his conviction, in such manner and form, as the same ought to be paid, within six weeks next after his conviction ; That then every person so convict, and so not paying the same, shall for the same first offence, in stead of the said sum, suffer imprisonment by the space of six moneths without Bail or Mainprise : And if any person, or persons, that for his second offence concerning the premisses shall be convict in form afore- said, do not pay the said sum to be paid by vertue of his con- viction, and this estatute, in such manner and form, as the same ought to be paid, within six weeks next after this said second conviction ; That then every person so convicted, and not paying the same, shall for the same second offence, in the stead of the said sum, suffer imprisonment during twelve moneths without Bail or Mainprise : and. That from and after the said Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next coming, all, and every person and persons, inhabiting within this Realm, or any other the Queens Majesties Dominions, shall diligently and faithfully, having no lawful, or reasonable excuse to be absent, indeavour themselves to resort to their Parish -Church, or Chappel accustomed, or upon reasonable let thereof, to some usual place, where Common Prayer, and such service of God shall be used in such time of let, upon every Sunday, and other dayes ordained and used to be kept as holy days, and tlien, and there to abide orderly and soberly, during the time of Common Prayer, Preachings, or other Service of GoD there to be used and ministred, upon pain of punishment by the censures of the Church ; and also upon pain, that every person so offending shall for- feit for every such offence twelve pence, to be levied by the Churchwardens of the Parish, where such offence shall be done, to the use of the poor of the same Parish, of the 86 acts Of Oniformitj^. goods, lauds, and teuemects of such offeuder, by way of distress. [i] And for due execution hereof, tlie Queens most excel- lent Majesty, the Lords Temporal, and all the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, doth in Gods Name earnestly require, and charge all tlie Archbishops, Bishops, and other Ordinaries, that they shall endeavour themselves to the uttermost of their knowledges, that the due aud tiiie execution hereof may be had throughout their Diocesse and Charges, as they -Hill auswer before God for such evils and plagues, wherewith Almighty God may justly punish His people for neglecting His good and wholsom law. And for their .Authority in this behalf. Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That all aud singular the same Arch- bishops, Bishops, and all other their officers, exercising Ecclesiastical jurisdiction, aswel in place exempt, as not exempt, within their Diocesse shall have full power and Authority by this Act to reform, correct and punish by censures of the Church, all, and singular persons, which shall offend within any of their jurisdictions, or Diocesse, after the said Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next coming, against this Act aud Statute : Any other Law, Statute, Priviledge, Liberty, or Provision heretofore made, had, or suffered to the contrary notwithstauding. [5] And it is Ordaiued and Enacted by the Authority afore- said. That all and every Justice of Oyer and Determiner, or Justices of Assize shall have full power and Authority in every of their open and general Sessions to enquire, hear and determine all and all manner of offences, that shall be com- mitted, or done contrary to any Article contained in this present Act, within the limits of the Commission to them directed, and to make process for the execution of the same, as they may do against any person being indicted before them of trespass, or lawfully convicted thereof. [6] ProWded always, and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That all and every Archbishop and Bishop shall and may at all time and times at his liberty and pleasure, joyn and associate himself by vertue of this Act to the said Justices of Oyer and Determiner, or to the said Justices of Assise, at every of the said opeu and general Sessions, to be holden in any place within his Diocess for and to the inquiry, hearing, and determining of the offences aforesaid. [7] Provided also, and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That the Books concerning the said Service shall at the costs and charges of the Parishioners of every Parish, and Cathedral Church be attained, and gotten before the said Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next following, and that all such Parishes and Cathedral Churches, or other places, where the said Books shall be attained and gotten liefore the said Feast of the Nativity of Saint Joltn Baptist, sliall within three weeks next after the said books so attained and gotten, use the said Service, and put the same in use according to this Act. [8] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That no person or jiersons shall bo at any time hereafter impeached, or otherwise molested of or for any of the offences above mentioned, hereafter to be committed, or done con- trary to this Act, unless he or they so offending be thereof indicted at the next general sessions to be holden before any ouch Justices of Oyer aud Determiner, or Justices of Assise, next after any offence committed or done, contrary to the tcnour of tliia Act. [9] Provided always, and be it Ordained, and Enacted by the Authority afore said. That all aud singular Lords of the Parliament, for the third offence above mentioned, shall be tried by their Peers. [10] Provided also, and be it Ordained, and Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That the JIayor of London, aud all other ^Mayors, Baylifts, and other Head-officers of all, and singular Cities, Boroughs, and Towns-corporate within this Realm, Wales and the Marches of the same, to tlie which Justices of Assise do not commonly repair, shall have full power and Authority by vertue of this Act, to enquire, hear, and deter- mine the offences abovesaid, and every of them yearly, within fifteen days after the Feasts of Easter, and saint Michael the Archangel, in like manner and form, as Justices of Assise, and 0}'er, and Determiner may do. [11] Provided always, and be it Ordained and Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That all and singular Archbishops, and Bishops, and every of their Chancellors, Commissaries, Archdeacons, and other Ordinaries, having any peculiar Ecclesiastical jurisdiction shall have full jjower and Authority by vertue of this Act, aswel to enquire in their A'isitation, Synods, or elsewhere within their jurisdiction, at any other time, and place, to take accusations, and infonnations of all, and every tlie things above mentioned, done, committed, or pei-jjetrated within the limits of their jurisdiction and Autho- rity, aud to punish the same by admonition, excommunication, sequestration, or deprivation, or other censures, and processes, in Hke form, as heretofore hath been used in like cases by the (Jueens Ecclesiastical Laws. [12] Provided alwaies, and be it Enacted, That whatsoever person offending in the premisses shall for the first offence receive punishment of the Ordinary, having a testimonial thereof under the said Ordinaries seal, shall not for the same offence eftsoons be convicted before the Justices ; and like- wise receiving for the said first offence punishment by the Justices, he shall not for the same first offence eftsoons receive punishment of the Ordinary : Any thing contained in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding. [13] Provided always, and be it Enacted, That such ornaments of the Church and of the ministers thereof shall be retained, and be in use, as was in this Church of England by the Authority of Parliament in the second year of the reign of King Edward ihc Sixth, until other order shall be therein taken by Authority of the Queens Majesty, with the advice of Her Commissioners, appointed aud Authorized under the great seal of Emjland for causes Ecclesiastical, or of the Metropolitan of this Realm ; And also. That if there shall happen any contempt, or irreverence to be used in the Ceremonies, or Rites of the Church, by the misusing of the Orders appointed in this Book ; the Queens Majesty may by the like advice of the said Commissioners, or Metropolitan, ordain and publish such further Ceremonies, or Rites, as may be most for the advancement of Gods glory, the edifying of His Church, and the due reverence of Cheists holy Mysteries and Sacraments. [14] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That all Laws, vStatutes, and Ordinances, wherein, or whereby any other Service, Administration of Sacraments, or Common Prayer is limited, established, or set forth to bo used within this Realm, or any other the Queens Dominions, and Coun- tries, shall from henceforth utterly be void, and of none effect. acts of OniforinitjD. !7 [A few alterations being made iu the Prayer Book after the Hampton Court Conference [sec. p. 25], a Royal Proclamation was issued, on March 5, 1604, in which the reasons for making these alterations were stated, and the use of the new book en- joined. This Proclamation was printed after tlie Elizabethan Act of Uniformity in all I'rayer Books of the reigns of James I. and Charles I., but was omitted by the Revisers of l(i(jl, the Caroline Act of Uniformity being substituted for it in tlie printed Prayer Books of 1662 and all subsequent dates.' For tlie sake of historical completeness, and to illustrate the atti- tude of the Crown towards the Prayer Book on the accession of James I. , the Proclamation is here printed entire. ] By the KiNfi. IT A Proclamation for the authorizing of an uniformity of the Book of Common Prayer to be used thorowout the Realm. ALTHOUGH it cannot be unknown to Our iSubjects by tlie former Declarations wee have published, what our purposes and proceedings have been in matters of Religion since Our coming to this Crown : Yet tlie same being now by Us re- duced to a settled f\irm, wee have occasion to repeat somewhat of that which hath passed : And now at Our very first entry into the Realm, being entertained and importuned with infor- mations of sundry Ministers, complaining of the errours and imperfections of the Church here aswel iu matter of Doctrine, as of Discipline : Although wee liad no reason to presume that things were so farre amisse as was pretended, because wee had seen the Kingdom under that form of Religion which by Law was established in the dayes of the late Queen of famous memorie, blessed with a Peace and Prosperity, both extraordinary and of many yeers continuance (a strong evidence that God was therewith well jileased,) yet because the importunitie of the Complainers was great, their affirma- tions vehement, and the zeal wherewith tlie same did seem to l>e accompanied, very specious : wee were moved thereby t" make it Our occasion to discharge tliat duety which is the chiefest of all Kingly dueties. That is, to settle the afl'airs of Religion, and the Service of God before their own, which while wee were in hand to do, as the contagion of the sick- uesse reigning in Our Citie of London and other places, would permit an assembly of persons meet for that purpose ; some of those who inisliked the state of Religion here established, 2)resuming more of Our intents than ever wee gave them cause to do, and transported with luimour, liegan such proceedings, as did rather raise a scandall in the Church, then take offence away. For lioth they used Forms of publike serving of God not here allowed, held Assemblies without authority, and did other things carying a very apparent shew of Sedition, more then of Zeal : whom wee restrained by a former Proclamation in the monetli of October last, and gave intimation of the Conference wee intended to be had with as much speed as conveniently could bee, for the ordering of those things of tlie Ohurch, which accordingly followed in the moneth of January last at Our Honour of Hampton Court, where before Our Self, and Our Privie Councell, were assembled many of the gravest Bishops and Prelates of the Realm, and many other learned men, aswell of those that are conformable to tlie State of the Church established, as of those that dissented. Among whom, what Our Pains were, what Our patience in hearing and reply, ing, and what the indifl'erence and uprightnesse of Our Judgement in determining, wee leave to the report of those who heard tlie same, contenting Our Self with the Sincerity of Our own heart therein. But \'\'ee cannot conceal that the successe of that Conference was such as happeneth to many other things, which moving great expectation before they be entred into, in their issue produce small effects. For Wee 1 Tlic only record of this omission is a MS. note iu the margin of the Prayer Book of 1639, which contained the "Additions and Alterations " as submitted to the Crown by Convocation. [See p. 38.] The note is as follows : " This Proclamatiou is left out : ami licerc foUoweth Tnr. Preface \\ch you hauc at ye beginning of this book." found many and vehement Informations supported with so weak and slender proofs, as it appeareth unto Us and Our Counsell, that there was no cause wliy any change should have been at all in that which was most impugned, the Book of Common prayer, containing thefomi of the publike Service of (iod here established, neither in the doctrine, which appeared to bee sincere, nor in the Forms and Rites, wliieh were justified out of the practice of the Primitive Church. Notwithstand- ing, We thought meet, with consent of the Bishops, and other learned men there present, Tliat some small things might rather be explained then changed, not that the same might not very well have been born with by men who would have made a reasonable construction of them : but for that in a matter concerning the Service of God We were nice, or rather jealous, that the publique form thereof should be free, not onely from blame, but from suspicion, so as neither the comnidn Adversary should have advantage to wrest ought therein contained, to other sense then the Church of Emjland intendeth, nor any troublesome or ignorant person of this Church be able to take the least occasion of cavill against it : And for that purpose gave forth Our Commission under Our great Seal of England to the Archbishop of Canterbury and others, according to the Form which the Lawes of this Realm in like case prescribe to bee used, to make the said Explanation, and to cause the whole Book of Common prayer with the same Explanations, to be newly printed. Which being now done, and established anew after so serious a deliberation, altliough we doubt not, but all Our Subjects, both Ministers and others, wiU receive the same with such reverence as appertaineth, and conform themselves thereunto, every man in that which him concern- eth : Yet have wee thouglit it necessary to make known by Proclamation Our authorizing of the same. And to require and eiijoyn all men, aswell Ecclesiasticall as Teniporall, to con- form themselves unto it, and to the practice thereof, as the onely publique form of serving God established and allowed to be in this Realm. And the ratlier, for that all the learned men who were there present, as well of yc Bishops as others, pro- mised their conformity in the practice of it, onely making suit to Us, that, some few might be born with for a time. Where- fore Wee require all Archbishops, Bishops, and all other pub- like Ministers, as well Ecclesiasticall as Civill, to do their duties in causing the same to be obeyed, in punishing the offenders according to the Lawes of the Realm heretofore established, for the authorizing of the said Book of Common praj'er. And wee tliink it also necessary, that the said Arch- bisliops, and Bishops, do each of them in his Province and Diocesse take order : That every Parish do procure to them- selves, within such time as they shall think good to limit, one of the said Books so explained. And last of all, wee doe admonish all men, that hereafter they shall not expect, nor attempt any further alteration in the Common Publique form of Gods service, from this which is now established, for that neither will we give way to any to presume, that Our own Judgement having determined in a matter of this weight, shall be swayed to alteration by the frivolous suggestions of any liglit spirit : neither are wee ignorant of the inconveniences that do arise in government, by admitting innovation in things once setled by mature deliberation : And how necessary it is to use constancie in the upholding of the publique determina- tions of States, for that such is the unquietnesse and unsted- fastnesse of some dispositions, affecting every yeer new forms of tilings, as if they should bee followed in their uncon- stancie, would make all actions of States ridiculous and con- temptible : Whereas the stedfast maintaining of things by good advice established, is the weal of all Commonwealths. Given at Our Palace of Westminster, the fifth day of March, in the first year of Our Reign of England, France, and Ireland, and of Scotland the seven and thirtieth. God s.vve tuk Kim.;. AN ACT UNIFORMITY OF PUBLICK PRAYERS, And Administration of Sacraments, and other Rites and Ceremonies : And for establishing the Form of Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating Bishops, Priests, and Deacons in the Church of England. XIV. Carol. II. [14 Charles II. c. 4, A.D. 1662.] WHEREAS in the first year of the late Queen Elizabeth there was one Uniform Order of Common Service and Prayer, and of the Administration of Sacraments, Rites and Ceremonies in the Church of England (agreeable to the Word of God, and usage of the Primitive Church) compiled by the Reverend Bishops and Clergy, set forth in one Book, Entituled, 2'Ae Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of Sacraments, and other Rites and Ceremonies in the Church of England, and enjoyned to be used by Act of Parliament, holden in the said First year of the said late Queen, Entituled, An Act for the Uniformity of Common Prayer, and Service in the Church, and Administration of the Sacraments, very comfortable to all good people desirous to live in Christian conversation, and most profitable to the Estate of this Realm, upon the which the Mercy, Favour and Blessing of Almighty God is in no wise so readily and plentifully poured, as by Common Prayers, due using of the Sacraments, and often Preaching of the Gospel, with devotion of the hearers : And yet this notwithstanding, a great number of people in divers parts of this Realm, follow- ing their own sensuality, and living without knowledge and due fear of God, do wilfully and Schismatically abstain, and refuse to come to their Parish Churches and other Publick places where Common Prayer, Administration of the Sacra- ments, and Preaching of the Word of God is used upon the Sundays and other days ordained and appointed to be kept and observed as Holy days : And whereas by the great and scandalous neglect of Ministers in using the said Order, or Liturgy so set forth and enjoyned as aforesaid, great mischiefs and inconveniences, during the times of the late unhappy troubles, have arisen and grown ; and many people have been led into Factions and Schisms, to the great decay and scandal of the Reformed Religion of the Church of England, and to the hazard of many souls : for prevention M-hereof in time to come, for setling the Peace of the Church, and for allaying the present distempers, which the indisposition of the time hath contracted, The Kings Majesty (according to His Decla- ration of the Five and twentieth of October, One thousand six hundred and sixty) granted His Commission under the great Seal of England to several Bishops and other Divines to review the Book of Common Prayer, and to prepare such Alterations and Additions, as they thought fit to offer ; And afterwards the Convocations of both tlie Provinces of Canterbury and York, being by hia Majesty called and assembled (and now sitting) His Majesty hath ))cen pleased to Authorize and require the Presidents of the said Convocations, and other the Bishops and Clergy of the same, to review the said Book of Common Prayer, and the Book of the Form and manner of the Making and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons ; And that after mature consideration, they shouhl make such Additions and Alterations in the said Books respectively, as to them should seem moot and convenient ; And should exhibit and present the same to Hia Majesty in writing, for his further allowance or confirmation ; since which time, upon full and mature deliberation, they the said Presidents, Bishops, and Clergy of both Provinces have accordingly reviewed the said Books, and have made some Alterations which they think fit to be inserted to the same ; and some Additional Prayers to the said Book of Common-Prayer, to be used upon proper and emergent occasions ; and have exhibited and presented the same unto his Majesty in writing, in one Book, Entituled, The Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of the Sacraments, anil other Bites and Cere- monies of the Church, according to the use of the Church of England, together with the Psalter, or Psalms 0/ David, Pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches ; and the Form and Manner of Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons: All which His Majesty having duely considered hath fully approved and allowed the same, and recommended to this present Parliament, that the said Books of Common Prayer, and of the Form of Ordination and Con- secration of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, with the Altera- tions and Additions, which have been so made and presented to His Majesty by the said Convocations, be the Book, which shall be appointed to be used by all that OflSciate in all Cathedral and Collegiate Churches and Chappels, and in all Chappels of Colledges and Halls in both the Universities, and the Colledges of Eaton and Winchester, and in all Parish- Churches and Chappels within the Kingdom of England, Dominion of Wales, and Town of Berwick upon Tweed, and by all that Make, or Consecrate Bishops, Priests or Deacons in any of the said Places, under such Sanctions and Penalties as the Houses of Parliament shall think fit : Now in regard that nothing conduceth more to the setling of the Peace of this Nation (which is desired of all good men) nor to the honour of our Religion, and the propagation thereof, than an Universal agreement in the Public Worship of Almighty God ; and to the intent that every person within this Realm, may certainly know the rule, to which he is to conform in Public Worship, and Administration of Sacraments, and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church of England, and the manner how, and by whom Bishops, Priests, and Deacons are, and ought to be made. Ordained and Consecrated ; [2] Be it Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty, by the advice, and with the consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same. That all and singular Ministers, in any Cathedral, Collegiate, or Parish- Church or Chappel, or other place of Publick Worship within this Realm of England, Dominion of Wales, and Town of Bn-wick upon Tii'ped, .shall be bound to say and use the Morn- ing Prayer, Evening Prayer, Celebration and Administration ' of both the Sacraments, and all other the Publick, and Common acts of anifovmltg. 89 Prayer, in such order and form as is mentioned in the said Book, annexed and joyned to this pi'esent Act, and Entituled, The Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of (he Sacra- mcnts, and other Riles and Ceremonies of the Church, according to the u.ie of the Church of England : together with t/ie Psalter or Psalms of David, Pointed as they are to he sung or said in Churches; and the form or manner of Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons ; and Tliat the Morning and Evening Prayers, therein contained, shall upon every Lords day, and upon all other days and occasions, and at the times therein appointed, be openly and solemnly read by all and every Minister or Curate in every Church, Chappel, or other place of Publick Worship within this Realm of England, and places aforesaid. [3] And to the end that Uniformity in tlie Publick Worship of God (wliich is so much desired) may be speedily effected, Be it furtlier Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That every Parson, Vicar, or other Minister whatsoever, who now hath, and enjoyeth any Ecclesiastical Benefice, or Promotion within this Realm of England, or places aforesaid, shall in the Church, Chappel, or place of Publick Worship belonging to his said Benefice or Promotion, upon some Lords day before the Feast of Saint Bartholomevi, which shall bo in the year of our Lord God, One thousand six hundred sixty and two, openly, publickly, and solemnly read the Morning and Evening Prayer appointed to be read by, and according to the said Book of Common Prayer at the times thereby appointed, and after such reading thereof shall openly and publickly, before the Congregation there assembled, declare his unfeigned assent, and consent to the use of all things in the said Book contained and prescribed, in these words, and no other ; [4] / A. B. Do here declare my unfeigned assent, and consent to all, and every thing contained, and prescribed in, and by the Book intituled. The Book of Common Prayer and Administra- tion of the Sacraments, and other Kites, and Ceremonies of the Church, according to the use of the Church of England ; together with the Psalter, or Psalms of David, Pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches, and the form, or manner of Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons. [5] And, That all and every such person, who shall (without some lawful Impediment, to bo allowed and approved of by the Ordinary of the place) neglect or refuse to do the same within the time aforesaid, or (in case of such Impediment) within one Moneth after such Impediment removed, shall ipso facto be deprived of all his Spiritual Promotions ; And that from thenceforth it shall be lawful to, and for all Patrons, and Donors of all and singular the said Spiritual Promotions, or of any of them, according to their respective Rights, and Titles, to present, or collate to the same ; as though the person, or persons, so ofTeudiug or neglecting were dead. [6] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That every person, who shall hereafter be presented, or collated, or put into any Ecclesiastical Benefice, or Promotion within this Realm of England and places aforesaid, shall in the Church, Chajipel, or place of Publick Worship, belonging to his said Benefice or Promotion, within two Moneths next after that he shall be in the actual possession of the said Ecclesiastical Benefice or Promotion, upon some Lords day openly, publickly and solemnly Read the Morning and Even- ing Prayers, appointed to be Read by, and according to the said Book of Common Prayer, at the times thereby appointed, and after such Reading thereof, shall openly, and publickly before the Congregation there assembled, declare his unfeigned assent, and consent to the use of all things therein contained and prescribed, according to the form before appointed : and That all and every such person, who shall (without some lawful Impediment, to be allowed and approved by the Ordinary of the place) neglect or refuse to do the same within the time aforesaid, or (in case of such Impediment) within one month after such Impediment removed, shall ipso facto be deprived of all his said Ecclesiastical Benefices and Promotions ; and That from thenceforth, it shall and may be lawful to, and for all Patrons, and Donors of all and singular the said Ecclesiastical Benefices and Promotions, or any of them (according to their respective Rights and Titles) to present, or collate to the same, as though the person or persons so offending, or neglecting, were dead. [7] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That in all places, where the proper Incumbent of any Parsonage, or Vicarage, or Benefice with Cure doth reside on his Living, and keep a Curate, the Incumbent himself in person (not having some lawful Impediment, to be allowed by the Ordinary of the place) sliall once (at the least) in every month openly and puMickly Read the Common Prayers and Service, in, and by the said Book prescribed, and (if there be occasion) Administer each of the Sacraments and other Rites of tlie Church, in the Parisli Church or Chappel, of, or belong- ing to the same Parsonage, Vicarage, or Benefice, in such order, manner and form, as in, and by the said Book is appointed, upon pain to forfeit the sum of Five pounds to the use of the poor of the Parish for every offence, upon conviction by confession, or proof of two credible Witnesses upon Oath, before two Justices of the Peace of the County, City, or Town- Corporate where the offence shall be committed, (which Oath the said .Justices are hereby Impowred to Administer) and in default of payment within ten days, to be levied by distress, and sale of the goods and chattels of the Offender, by the Warrant of the said Justices, by the Church -wardens, or Over-seers of the Poor of the said Parish, rendring the sur- plusage to the party. [8] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That every Dean, Canon, and Prebendary of every Cathedral, or Collegiate Church, and all Masters, and other Heads, Fellows, Chaplains, and Tutors of, or in any Colledge, Hall, House of Learning, or Hospital, and every Publick Professor, and Reader in either of the Universities, and in every Col- ledge elsewhere, and every Parson, Vicar, Curate, Lecturer, and every other person in holy Orders, and every School- master keeping any publick, or private School, and every person Instructing, or Teaching any Youth in any House or private Family as a Tutor, or School-master, who upon the first day of May, which shall be in the year of our Lord God, One thousand six hundred sixty two, or at any time thereafter shall be Incumbent, or have possession of any Deanry, Canonry, Prebend, Mastership, Headship, Fellow-ship, Pro- fessors-place, or Readers place. Parsonage, Vicarage, or any other Ecclesiastical Dignity or Promotion, or of any Curates place. Lecture, or School ; or shall instruct or teach any Youth as Tutor, or School-master, shall before the Feast-d.ay of Saint Bartholomew, which shall be in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred sixty two, or at or before his, or their respective admission to be Incumbent, or have posses- sion aforesaid, subscribe the Declaration or Acknowledgement following. Scilicet : [9] / A. B. Do declare that it is not lauful upon any pre- tence whatsoever to take Arms against the King; and that I do ahhor that Traiterous Position of taking Arms by His Authority against His Person, or against those that are Commissionated by him ; and that I will conform to the Liturgy of the Church of England, as it is now by Laiv established. And I do declare that I do hold, there lies no Obligation upon me, or on any other person from the Oath, commonly called the Solemn League and Covenant, to endeathnr any change, or alteration of Govern- ment, either in Church, or State ; and that the same was in it self an unlawful Oath, and imposed ujjon the Subjects of this Realm against the known Laws and Liberties of this Kingdom. 90 3cts of On!formit|). [10] Wliich said Declaration and Acknowledgement shall be subscribed by every of the said ^Masters and other Heads, Fellows, Chaplains, and Tutors of, or in any CoUedge, Hall, or House of Learning, and by every pul)lick Professor and Reader in either of the Universities, before the Vice-Chan- cellor of the respective Universities for the time being, or his Deputy ; And the said Declaration or Acknowledgement shall be subscribed before the respective Arch-bishop, Bishop or Ordinary of the Diocess, by every other person hereby in- joyned to subscribe the same, upon pain, that all and every of the persons aforesaid, failing in such subscription, sliall lose and forfeit such respective Deani-y, Canonry, Prebend, Mastership, Headship, Fellowship, Professors place, Headers place. Parsonage, Vicarage, Ecclesiastical Dignity, or Promo- tion, Curates place. Lecture, and School, and shall be utterly disabled, and ijiso facto deprived of the same ; and that eveiy such respective Deanry, Canoniy, Prebend, llastership. Headship, Fellowship, Professors place. Readers place, Par- sonage, Vicarage, Ecclesiastical Dignity, or Promotion, Curates place, Lecture and School shall be void, as if such person so failing were naturally dead. [11] .And if any Schoolmaster or other jiersou, Instructing or teaching Youth in any private House or Family, as a Tutor or Schoolmaster, shall Instruct or Teach an3' Youth as a Tutor or Schoolmaster, before License obtained from his respective Archbishop, Bishop, or Ordinary of the Diocess, according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm, (for which he shall pay twelvepence onely) and before such subscription and acknow- ledgement made as aforesaid ; Then every such School-master and other, Instructing and Teaching as aforesaid, shall for the first oflfence sufter three months Imprisonment ^^■ithout bail or mainprise ; and for eveiy second and other such offence shall suffer three months Imprisonment without bail or main- prise, and also forfeit to His Majesty the sura of five pounds. And after such subscription made, every sxich Parson, Vicar, Curate, and Lecturer shall procure a certificate under the Hand and Seal of the respective Archbishop, Bishop, or Ordinary of the Diocess, (who are hereby enjoyued and re- quired upon demand to make and deliver the same) and shall publickly and openly read the same, together with the Declaration, or Acknowledgement aforesaid, upon some Lords day within three months then next following, in his Parish Church where he is to ofiiciate, in the presence of the Con- gregation there assembled, in the time of Divine Service ; upon pain that every person failing therein shall lose sucli Parson- age, Vicarage, or Benefice, Curates place, or Lecturers place respectively, and shall be utterly disabled, and ipso farlo deprived of the same ; And that the said Parsonage, Vicarage, or Benefice, Curates place or Lecturers place shall be void, as if he was naturally dead. [12] Provided always, tliat from and after the Twenty fifth day of March, which shall be in tlie year of our Lord God, One thousand six hundred eighty two, there shall be omitted in the said Declaration or Acknowledgement so to be sub- scribed and read, these words following, scilicet, And J do declare thai I do hold there /»'■■* no ohliyation on me, or on any other person from the Oath, commonly called The solemn League and Covenant, to endeavour any change, or alteration of Government cither in Church or State; And tltat tlie same was in it self an unlawful Oath, and imposed upon the Sulrjecls of this Realm against the hnoion Laws and Liberties of this Kingdom ; So as none of the persons aforesaid shall from tlienceforth be at all obliged to subscribe or read that part of the said Declaration or Acknowledgement. [13] Provided always, and be it Enacted, That from and after the Feast of Saint Bartholomew, wliich shall be in the year of our Lord, One thousand six liundred sixty and two, no person, who now is Incumbent, and in possession of any Parsonage, Vicarage, or Benefice, and who is not already in holy Orders by Episcopal Ordination, or shall not before the Feast-day of Saint Bartholomew be ordained Priest or Deacon, according to the form of Episcopal Ordination, shall have, hold, or enjoy the said Parsonage, Vicarage, Benefice with Cure or other Ecclesiastical Promotion within this Kingdom of England, or the Dominion of Wales, or Town of Berwick iq)on Tweed ; but shall be utterly disabled, and i]}so facto deprived of tlie same ; and all his Ecclesiastical Promotions sliall be void, as if he was naturally dead. [14] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That no person wliatsoever shall thenceforth be capable to be admitted to any Parsonage, Vicarage, Benefice, or other Ecclesiastical Promotion or Dignity wliatsoever, nor shall presume to Consecrate and Administer the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper, before such time as he shall be Ordained Priest, according to the form and maimer in, and by the said IJook prescribed, unless he have formerly been made Priest l>y Episcoj)al Ordination, upon pain to forfeit for every offence tlie sum of One hundred pounds ; (one moyety thereof to the Kings ilajesty, the other moyety thereof to be equally divided between the poor of the Parish where the offence shall be committed, and such person, or persons as shall sue for the same by Action of Debt, Bill, Plaint, or Information in any of his Majesties Courts of Record ; wherein no Essoign, Pro- tection, or Wager of Law shall be allowed) And to be disabled from taking, or being admitted into the Order of Priest, by the space of one whole year then next following. [15] Provided that the Penalties in this Act shall not extend to the Foreiners or Aliens of the Forein Reformed Churches allowed, or to be allowed by the Kings Majesty, His Heirs and Successors, in England. [16] Provided always. That no title to confer, or present by lapse shall accrue by any avoidance, or deprivation ipso facto by vertue of this Statute, but after six months after notice of such voidance, or deprivation given by the Ordinary to the Patron, or such sentence of deprivation openly and publickly read in the Parisli Church of the Benefice, Parson- age, or Vicarage becoming void, or whereof the Incumbent shall be deprived by vertue of this Act. [17] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That no Form, or Order of Common Prayers, Administration of Sacraments, Kites or Ceremonies shall be openly used in any Church, Chappel, or other Publick place of or in any CoUedge, or Hall in either of the Lfniversities, the Colledges of Westminster, Winchester, or Eaton, or any of them, other than what is prescribed and appointed to be used in and by the said Book ; and That the present Governour, or Head of every CoUedge and Hall in the said Universities, and of the said Colledges of Westminster, Winchester, and Eaton, within one month after tlie Feast of Saint Bartholomew, wliich shall be in the year of our Lord, One thousand six hundred sixty and two : And every Governour or Head of any of tlie said Colledges, or Halls, hereafter to be elected, or appointed, witliin one month next after his Election, or Collation, and Admission into the same Government, or Headship, shall openly and publickly in the Cluirch, Chappel, or other Publick jilacc of tlie same Colledgc, or Hall, and in the pre- sence of the Fellows and Scholars of tlie same, or the greater part of them then resident. Subscribe unto the Nine and thirty Articles of Religion, mentioned in the Statute made in the thirteenth year of tlic Reign of tlie late Queen Elizabeth, and unto the said Book, and declare his unfeigned assent and consent unto, and approljation of the said Articles, and of the same Book, ami to tlie use of all tlie Prayers, Rites, and Ceremonies, Forms, and Orders in the said Book prescribed, and contained according to the form aforesaid ; and that all sucli Governours, or Heads of the said Colledges and Halls, or any of them as are, or sliall be in holy Orders, shall once at least in every Quarter of the year (not having a lawful acts of Oniformltj). 91 Impediment) opeuly and publickly Read the Morning Prayer, and Service in and by the said Book appointed to be Read in the Church, Chappel, or other Publick place of the same Col- ledge or Hall, upon pain to lose, and be suspended of, and from all tlie iienetits and Profits belonging to the same Government or Headship, by the space of Six months, by the Visitor or Visitors of the same CoUedge or Hall ; And if any Governour or Head of any CoUedge or Hall, Suspended for not Subscriliing unto the said Articles and Book, or for not Reading of the Morning Prayer and Service as aforesaid, shall not at, or before the end of Six months next after such sus- pension, Subscribe unto the said Articles and Book, and declare his consent thereunto as aforesaid, or read the Morn- ing Prayer and Service as aforesaid, then aueh Government or Headship shall be ipso facto void. [18] Provided always. That it shall and nuiy be lawful to use the Morning and Evening Prayer, and all other Prayei's and Service prescribed in and by the said Book, in the Chappels or other Publick places of the respective Colledges and Halls in both the Universities, in the Colledges of Westminster, Winchester, and Eaton, and in the Convocations of the Clergies of either Pro\-ince in Latine ; Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding. [19] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That no person shall be, or be received as a Lecturer, or permitted, suffered, or allowed to Preach as a Lecturer, or to Preach, or Read any Sermon or Lecture in any Church, Chappel, or other place of Publick worship, within this Realm of England, or the Dominion of Wafes, and Town of Bcrioick upon Ttoeed, unless he be tirst approved and thereunto Licensed by the Archbishop of tlie Province, or Bishop of the Diocess, or (in case the See be void) by the Ciuardian of the Spiritualties, under his Seal, and shall in the presence of the same Archbishop, or Bishop, or Guardian Read the Nine and thirty Articles of Religion, mentioned in the Statute of the Thirteenth year of the late Queen Elizabeth, with Declaration of his unfeigned assent to the same ; and That every person, and persons who now is, or liereafter shall be Licensed, As- signed, Appointed, or Received as a Lecturer, to preach upon any day of the week in any Church, Chappel, or place of Publick worsliip within this Realm of England, or places aforesaid, the first time he Preacheth (before his Sermon) shall openly, publickly, and solemnly Read the Common Prayers and Service in and by the said Book appointed to be Read for that time of tlie day, and then and there publickly and openly declare his assent unto, and approbation of the said Book, and to the use of all the Prayers, Rites and Cere- monies, Forms and Orders therein contained and prescribed, according to the Form before appointed in this Act ; And also shall upon the first Lecture-day of every month after- wards, so long as he continues Lecturer, or Preacher there, at the place appointed for his said Lecture or Sermon, liefore his said Lecture or Sermon, openly, jiublickly, and solemnly Read the Common Prayers and Service in and by the said Book appointed to be read for that time of the day, at which the said Lecture or Sermon is to be Preached, and after such Reading thereof, shall openly and publickly, before the Con- gregation there assembled, declare his unfeigned assent and consent unto, and approbation of the said Book, and to the use of all the Prayers, Rites and Ceremonies, Forms and Orders therein contained and prescribed, according to the form aforesaid ; and, That all and every such person and per- sons who shall neglect or refuse to do the same, shall from thenceforth be disabled to Preach the said, or any other Lecture or Sermon in the said, or any other Church, Chappel, or place of PubUck'worship, until such time as he and they shall openly, publickly, and solemnly Read the Common- Prayers and Service appointed by the said Book, and Conform in all points to the things therein appointed and prescribed, according to the purport, tnie intent, and meaning of this Act. [20] Provided alwaies, that if the said Sermon or Lecture be to be Preached or Read in any Cathedral, or Collegiate Church or Cliappel, it shall be sufficient for tlie said Lecturer openly at tlie time aforesaid, to declare his assent and consent to all tilings contained in the said Book, acconling to the form aforesaid. [21] And be it further Enacted Ijy the Authority aforesaid, That if any person who is by this Act disabled to Preach any Lecture or Sermon, shall during tlic time that he shall con- tinue and remain so disabled. Preach any Sermon or Lecture ; That then for every such offence the person and persons so offending shall suffer Three months Imprisonment in tlie Common Ciaol without Bail or mainprise, and that any two Justices of the Peace of any County of this Kingdom and places aforesaid, and the Mayor or other chief Magistrate of any City, or Town-Corporate, within the same, upon Certifi- cate from the Ordinary of the place made to him or them of the offence committed, shall, and are hereby required to com- mit tlie person or persons so offending to the Gaol of the same County, Cit}', or Town Corporate accordingly. [22] Provided alwaies, and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That at all and every time and times, when any Sermon or Lecture is to be Preached, the Common Prayers and Service in and by the said Book appointed to be Read for that time of the day, shall be openly, publickly, and solemnly Read by some Priest, or Deacon, in the Church, Chappel, or place of Publick worship, where tlie said Sermon or Lecture is to be preached, before such Sermon or Lecture ' be Preached ; And tliat the Lecturer then to Preach shall be present at the Reading thereof. [23] Provided nevertheless. That this Act shall not extend to tlie University-C'luirches in the Universities of this Realm, or either of them, wdien or at such times as any Sermon or Lecture is Preached or Read in the same Churches, or any of them, for, or as the publick University-Sermon or Lecture ; but that the same Sermons and Lectures may be Preached or Read in such sort and manner as the same have been hereto- fore Preached or Read ; This Act, or any thing herein con- tained to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding. [24] And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That the several good Laws, and Statutes of this Realm, which have been formerly made, and are now in force for the Uniformity of Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments, within this Realm of Enijhuul, and places aforesaid, shall stand in full force and strength to all intents and puqjoses whatsoever, for the establishing and confirming of the said Book ; Entituled, The Book of Common Prai/er, and Aclmi- nistration of the Sacraments, and other Riles and Ceremonies of the Church, according to the vse of the Cliurch 0/ England ; together with the Psalter or Psalms of David, Pointed as they are to he sung or said in Churches ; and the form or manner of Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons ; herein before mentioned to be joyned and annexed to this Act ; and shall be applied, practised, and put in use for the punishing of aU offences contrary to the said Laws, with relation to the Book aforesaid, and no other. [25] Provided alwaies, and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That in all those Prayers, Litanies, and Collects, which do any way relate to the King, Queen, or Royal Progeny, the Names be altered and changed from time to time, and fitted to the present occasion, according to the direction of laM'ful Authority. [26] Provided also, and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That a true Printed Copy of the said Book, Entituled, The Booh of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments, and other Piles and Ceremonies of the Church, according to the tise of the Church o/England ; together loith the Psalter, or Psalms of David, Pointed as they arc to be sung or said in Churches; and the form and manner of Malcing, Ordaining, aiul Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and 92 acts of Qniformitp. Beacons, shall at the costs and charges of the Parishioners of every Parish-Church, and Chappelry, Cathedral Church, Col- ledge, and Hall, be attained and gotten before the Feast-day of Saint Bartholomew, in the year of our Lord, One thousand six hundred sixty and two, upon pain of forfeiture of Three pounds by the month, for so long time as they shall then after be unprovided thereof, by every Parish, or Chappelry, Cathe- dral Church, CoUedge, and HaU, making default therein. [27] Provided alwaies, and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That the Bishops of Hereford, Saint Davids, Asaph, Bangor, and Landaff, and their Successors shall take such order among themselves, for the souls health of the Flocks committed to their Charge within Wales, That the Book here- unto annexed be tnily and exactly Translated into the Bril- tish or Welsh Tongue, and that the same so Translated and being by them, or any three of them at the least viewed, perused, and allowed, be Imprinted to such number at least, so that one of the said Books so Translated and Imprinted, may be had for every Cathedral, Collegiate, and Parish- Church, and Chappel of Ease in the said respective Diocesses, and places in Wales, where the Welsh is commonly spoken or used before the First day of May, One thousand six hundred sixty five ; and, That from and after the Imprinting and publishing of the said Book so Translated, the whole Divine Service shall be used and said by the Ministers and Curates throughout all Wales within the said Diocesses, where the Welsh Tongue is commonly used, in the Brittish or Welsh Tongue, in such manner and form as is prescribed according to the Book hereunto annexed to be used in the English Tongue, differing nothing in any Order or Form from the said English Book ; for which Book, so Translated and Imprinted, the Church-wardens of every of the said Parishes shaU pay out of the Parish-money in their hands for the use of the respective Churches, and be allowed the same on their Accompt ; and, That the said Bishops and their Successors, or any Three of them, at the least, shall set and appoint the price, for which the said Book shall be sold ; And one other Book of Common Prayer in the English Tongue shall be bought and had in every Church throughout Wales, in which the Book of Common Prayer in Welsh is to be had, by force of this Act, before the First day of May, One thousand six hundred sixty and four, and the same Book to remain in such convenient places, within the said Churches, that such as understand them may resort at all convenient times to read and peruse the same, and also such as do not understand the said Language, may by conferring both Tongues together, the sooner attain to the knowledge of the English. Tongoie ; Any thing in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding ; And until Printed Copies of the said Book so to be Translated may be had and provided, the Form of Common Prayer, established by Parliament before the making of this Act, shall be used as formerly in such parts of Wcdes, where the English Tongue is not commonly understood. [28] And tc the end that the true and perfect Copies of this Act, and tlie said Book hereunto annexed may be safely kept, and perpetually preserved, and for the avoiding of all disputes for the time to come ; Be it therefore Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, Tliat the respective Deans and Chapters of every Cathedral, or Collegiate Church, within England and Widcs shall at their proper costs and charges, before the twenty fifth day of Deceniher, One thousand six hundred sixty and two, obtain under the Great Seal of England a true and perfect printed Copy of this Act, and of the said Book annexed hereunto, to be by the said Deans and Chapters, and their Successors kept and preserved in safety for ever, and to be also produced, and shewed forth in any Court of Record, as often as they shall be thereunto lawfully required ; And also there shall be delivered tnie and perfect Copies of this Act, and of the same Book into the respective Courts at Wcslminster, and into the Tower of London, to be kept and preserved for ever among the Records of the said Courts, and the Records of the Tower, to be also produced and shewed forth in any Court as need shall require ; which said Books so to be exemplified under the Great Seal of England, shall be examined by such persons as the Kings Majesty shall appoint under the Great Seal of England for that purpose, and shall be compared with the Original Book hereimto aimexed, and shall have power to correct, and amend in writing any Error committed by the Printer in the printing of the same Book, or of any thing therein contained, and shall certifie in writing under their Hands and Seals, or the Hands and Seals of any Three of them at the end of the same Book, that they have examined and compared the same Book, and find it to be a true and perfect Copy ; which said Books, and every one of them so exemplified under the Great Seal of England, as aforesaid, shall be deemed, taken, ad- judged, and expounded to be good, and available in the Law to all intents and puii^oses whatsoever, and shall be accounted as good Records as this Book it self hereunto annexed ; Any Law or Custom to the conti'ary in any wise notivithstanding. [29] Provided also. That this Act or any thing therein con- tained shall not be prejudicial or hurtful unto the Kings Professor of the Law within the University of Oxford, for, or concerning the Prebend of Shipton, within the Cathedral Church of Sarmn, united and annexed unto the place of the same Kings Professor for the time being, by the late King James of blessed memory. [30] Provided always. That whereas the Six and thirtieth Article of the Nine and thirty Articles agreed upon by the Arch-bishops, and Bishops of both Provinces, and the whole Clergy in the Convocation holden at London, in the year of our Lord, One thousand five hundred si .cty two, for the avoid- ing of diversities of Opinions, and for establishing of consent, touching true Religion, is in these words following, viz. That the Boole of Consecration of Archbishops, and Bishops, and Ordaining of Priests and Deacons, lately set forth in the time of King Edward the Sixth, and confirmed at the same time by Authority of Parliament, doth contain all things necessary to such Consecration and Ordaining, neither hath it any thing that of itself is superstitious, and nngodly ; And therefore whosoever are Consecrated or Ordered according to the Rites of that Book, since the second year of the aforenamed King Edward unto this time, or hereafter shall be Consecrated or Ordered according to the same Rites ; We decree all such to be rightly, orderly, and lavfully Consecrated and Ordered ; [31] It be Enacted, and be it therefore enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That all Subscriptions hereafter to be had or made unto the said Articles, by any Deacon, Priest, or Ecclesiastical person, or other person whatsoever, who by this Act or any other Law now in force is required to Subscribe unto the said Articles, shall be construed and taken to extend, and shall be applied (for and touching the said Six and thirtieth Article) unto the Book containing the form and manner of Making, Ordaining, and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons in this Act mentioned, in such sort and manner as the same did heretofore extend unto the Book set forth in the time of King Edv'ard the Sixth, mentioned in the said Six and thirtieth Article ; Any thing in the said Article, or in any Statute, Act, or Canon heretofore had or made, to the contrary thereof in .any wise notwithstanding. [32] Provided also, That the Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites and Cere- monies of tliis Cluirch of England, together with the form and manner of Ordaining, and Consecrating Bishops, Priests, and Deacons heretofore in use, and respectively established bj' Act of P.arliament in tlie First and Eighth ytuirs of Queen Elizabeth, sliall be still used .and observed in the Cluirch of England, until tlie Feast of Saint Bartholomew, which shall bo in the year of our Lord God, One thousand six hundred sixty and two. AJ^ ACT FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE ACT OF UNIFORMITY 35 cand 36 Victoria, c. 35. [A.D. 1872.] WHEEEAS by the Act of Uniformity it is enacted that all and singular ministers in any cathedral, collegiate, or parish church or chapel, or other place of public worship in England, shall be bound to say and use the Morning Prayer, Evening Prayer, celebration and administration of both the Sacra- ments, and all other the public and common prayer, in such order and form as is mentioned in the Book of Common Prayer annexed to the said Act : And whereas in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-nine Commissioners were appointed by Her Majesty to inquire and consider, amongst other matters, the differences of practice which have arisen from varying 'interpretations put upon the rubrics, orders, and directions for regulating the course and conduct of public worship, the administration of the sacraments, and the other services contained in the Book of Common Prayer, with a view of explaining or amending the said rubrics, orders, and directions so as to secure general uniformity of practice in such matters as may be deemed essential, and to report thereon from time to time, having regard not only to the said rubrics, orders, and directions, but also to any other laws or customs relating to the matters aforesaid, with power to suggest any alterations, improve- ments, or amendments with respect to such matters or any of them : And whereas the said Commissioners have by their Rejjort dated the thirty-first day of August one thousand eight hundred and seventy recommended in manner therein mentioned : And whereas Her Majesty was pleased to authorize the Convocations of Canterbury and York to consider the said Report of the said Commissioners, and to report to Her Majesty thereon, and the said Convocations have accordingly made tlieir first reports to Her Majesty : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1. In this Act,— The term " Act of Uniformity " means the Act of the four- teenth year of the reign of King Charles the Definitions. ^ i ,, ^ t • ^.-^ i i .. a , x becond, chapter four, mtituled An Act for the Uniformity of Public Prayers and Administration of Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies, and for establishing the Form of Making, Ordaining, and Conse- crating Bishops, Priests, and Deacons in the Church of England," and includes the enactments confirmed and applied by that Act to the Book of Common Prayer : The term "Book of Common Prayer" means the book aimexed to the said Act of the reign of King Charles the Second, and intituled " The Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church according to the Use of the Church of England, together with the Psalter or Psalms of David pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches, and the Form or Manner of Making, Ordain- ing, and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons :"' The term "cathedral" means a cathedral or collegiate church in which the Book of Common Prayer is required by the Act of Uniformity to be used : The term "church" means any parish church, chapel, or other place of public worship which is not a cathedral as before defined, and in which the Book of Common Prayer is required by the Act of Uniformity to be used. 2. The shortened Order for Morning Prayer or for Evening Prayer, specified in the schedule to use of ahortencd this Act, may, on any day except Sunday, '^^^il.^T^ Christmas Day, Ash Wednesday, Good Friday, Prayer. and Ascension Day, be used, if in a cathedral in addition to, and if in a church in lieu of, the Order for Morning Prayer or for Evening Prayer respectively prescribed by the Book of Common Prayer. 3. Upon any special occasion approved by the ordinary, there may be used in any cathedral or church a _ , , _, *' •' Special service special form of service approved by the ordinary, for special so that there be not introduced into such °''"*"""' service anything, except anthems or hymns, which does not form part of the Holy Scriptures or Book of Common Prayer. 4. An additional form of service varying from any form pre- scribed by the Book of Common Prayer may Ijc Additional used at any hour on any Sunday or holy-day in |^||jy,°^4 any cathedral or church in which there are duly holy-days, read, said, or sung as required by law on such Sunday or holy- day at some other hour or hours the Order for Morning Prayer, the Litany, such part of the Order for the Admini- stration of the Lord's Supper or Holy Communion as is required to be read on Sundays and holy-days if there be no Communion, and the Order for Evening Prayer, so that there be not introduced into such additional service any portion of the Order for the Administration of the Lord's Supper or Holy Communion, or anything, except antliems or hymns, which does not form part of the Holy Scriptures or Book of Common Prayer, and so that such form of service and the mode in which it is used is for the time being approved by the ordinary ; provided that nothing in this section shall affect the use of any portion of the Book of Common Prayer as otherwise authorized by the Act of Uniformity or this Act. 5. Whereas doubts have arisen as to whether the following forms of service, that is to say, the Order separation of for Morning Prayer, the Litany and the services. Order for the Administration of the Lord's Supper or Holy 1 This definition is of considerable importance as regards the Text of the Prayer Book, since it makes tlie M.S. volume formerly annexed to the Act of Uniformity the ultimate authority for that Text. If, therefore, there should be any divergency between the text of the MS. and that of the Sealed Books, the latter nmst, it seems, give way to the former, notwith- standing the liSth cl.ause in tlie Act of Uniformity itself. 94 ^cts Of Oniformitp. Communion, may be used as separate services, and it is expedient to remove such doubts : Be it therefore enacted and declared that any such forms of service may be used to- gether or in varying order as separate services, or that the Litany may be said after the third collect in the Order for Evening Prayer, either in lieu of or in addition to the use of the Litany in the Order for IMorning Prayer, without preju- dice uevertlieless to any legal powers vested in the ordinary ; and any of the said forms of service may be used with or ■\vithout the preaching of a sermon or lecture, or the reading of a homilj'. 6. Whereas doubts have arisen as to whether a sermon or lecture may be preached without the common sermon witiioui prayers and services appointed by the Book previous service, ^f Common Prayer for the time of day being previously read, and it is expedient to remove such doubts ; Be it therefore enacted and declared, that a sermon or lecture may be preached without the common praj-ers or services appointed by the Book of Common Prayer being read before it is preached, so that such sermon or lecture be preceded by any ser\-ice autliorized by this Act, or by the Bidding Prayer, or by a collect taken from the Book of Common Prayer, with or without the Lord's Prayer. 7. Nothing in this Act shall affect the provi-sion with respect Saving of 34 and '^ *'^^ chapels of Colleges in the universities of 35 Vict. c. 26. O.^ford, Cambridge, and Durham, which is con- ° tained in section six of the Universities Tests Act, 1S71. 8. The schedule to this Act, and the notes thereto and Effect of directions therein, shall be construed and have sciiednie. effect as part of this Act. 9. This Act may be cited as " The Act of Uniformity Short title. Amendment Act, 1872." SCHEDULE. Note. — The Minister using the Shortened Order for ilorn- ing Prayer or for Evening Prayer in this schedule, may in his discretion add in its proper place any exliortation, prayer, canticle, hymn, psabn, or lesson contained in the Order for Morning Prayer or for Evening Prayer in the Book of Common Prayer and omitted or authorized to be omitted from such shortened order. Each of the twenty-two portions into which the one hundred and nineteenth psalm is di\'ided in the Book of Common Prayer shall be deemed, for the purposes of this schedule, to be a separate psalm. Shortened Forms of Service. The Shortened Order for Morning Prayer daily THBOUGHOrT THE YeAR, EXCEPT ON SUNDAY, ChRKTMAS Day, Ash Wednesday, Good Friday, and Ascension Day. Al the beginning of Morning Prayer the Minister shall read v>ith a loud voice some one or more of these sentences of the Scriptures that follow. When the wicked man, etc. A general Confession to be said of the whole Congregation after tlic Minister, all kneeling. Almighty and most merciful Father, etc. Tlie Absolution, or Remission of sins, to be 2>ronounced by the Priest alone, standing ; the 2)eople still kneeling. Almighty (ioA, the Father, etc. The people shall an/nver here, and at tlie end of oil other prayers, Amen. T/ien the Minister shall kneel, and say the Lord's Prayer with an aiuliblc voice ; the people also kneeling, and repeating it with him. Our Father, Which art in heaven, etc. Then likewise he slmll say, Lord, open Thou our lips, etc. etc. etc. Here all standing up, the Priest shall say. Glory be to the Father, etc. Tlicn slutll follow one or more of the Psalms appointed. And at the end of every Psalm throughout tlw year, arid likewise at the end of Benedieite, Benedictus, Magnificat, and Nunc dimittis, shall be repeated. Glory be to the Father, etc. IVicn shall be read distinctly, with an audible voice, eitlur the First Lesson taken out of the Old Testament as is apipointed in the Calendar, or the Second Lesson taken out of the Kcu- Tes- tament, except there be a Proper Lesson assigned for that day, in iL'hich case tlie Proper Lesson shall be read, and if there are two Proper Lessons each shall be read in its proper place ; he that readeth so standing and turning himself as he may best be heard of all such as arc present. Note, that before every Lesson the Minister shall say, Here beginneth such a Chapter, or Verse of such a Chapter, of such a Book. And after every Lesson, Here endeth the Lesson, or the First or the Second Lesson. And after the Lesson, or between the First and Second Lessons, shall be said or sung in English one of the folloioing : Either the Hymn called, Te Deum Laudamus. We praise Thee, God, etc. Or this Canticle, Benedieite, omnia opera. all ye works of the Lord, etc. Or the Hymn following (except when that shall happen to be read in the Lesson for the day, or for the Gospel on Saint John Baptist's Day) : Benedictus. St. Luke i. 68. Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, etc. Or this Psalm. Jubilate Deo. be joyful in the Lord, all ye lands, etc. Then shall be sung or said the Apostles' Creed by the Minister and the people standing. 1 believe in God the Father Almighty, etc. And after that, the people all devoutly kneeling, the Minister sliall pronounce with a loud voice, The Lord be with you. Answer. .And with thy spirit. Minister. Let us pray. Then tlie Prir.it shall say, O Lord, shew Thy mercy upon us, etc. etc. etc. Then shall follow three Collects. The first of the day, which shall be the same that is appointed at the Communion ; the second for Peace ; the third for grace to lire well ; and the two last Collects shall never alter, but daily be said at Morn- ing Prayer throughout all the year, asfoUoveth, nil kneeling. The second Collect for Peace. O God, Who art the Author of peace, etc. The third Collect for Grace. O Lord, our heavenly Father, etc. Here may follow an Anthem or Hymn: acts of 93niformit]|^. 95 Then tlicse two Prayers following : A Prayer of Saint Chrysostome. Almighty God, Who hast given us grace, etc. 2 Corinthians xiii. The grace of our Lord Jesus Clirist, etc. Here emleth the Shortened Order of Morning Prayer. The Shortened Ohder for Eveninu Prayer daily THROUGHOUT THE YeAR, EXCEPT ON SUNDAY, ChRISTMA.S Day, Ash Wednesday Good Friday, and Ascension Day. At the beginning of Evening Prayer the Minister shall read with' a loud voice some one or more of these sentences of the Scriptures that follow : When the wicked man, etc. A general Confession to be said of the whole Congregation after the Minister, all kneeling. Almighty and most merciful Father, etc. The Absolution, or Remission of sins, to be pronounced by the Priest alone, standing ; the people still kneeling. Almighty God, the Father, etc. Then the Minister shall kneel, and say the Lord's Prayer ; the people also kneeling, and repeating it with him. Our Father, Whicli art in heaven, e'tc. Then likewise he shall say, Lord, open Thou our lips. Here all standing u}), the Priest shall say, Glory be to the Father, etc. Then shall be said or sung one or more of the Psalms in order as they be appointed. Then either a Lesson of the Old Testa- ment as is appointed, or a Lesson of the New Testament as it is appointed, excepit there be a Proper Lesson assigned for that day, in tohich case the Proper Lesson shall be read, and if there are two Proper Lessons each shall be read in its proper place ; and after the Lesson, or bettiieen the First and Second Lessons, shall be said or sung in English one of the following : Eitlier Magnificat, or the Song of the Blessed Virgin Mary, in English, as follows: Magnificat. St. Luke i. My soul doth magnify the Lord, etc. Or this Psalm [except it be on the nineteeyith day of the month. lohen it is read in the ordinary course of the Psalms): Cantate Domino. Psalm xcviii. sing unto the Lord a new song, etc. Or Nunc dimittis {or the Song of Simeon , asfollowelh : Nunc dimittis. St. Luke ii. 29. Lord, uow lettest Thou Thy servant, etc. Or else this Psalm (except it be on the twelfth day of the month) : Deus misereatur. Psalm Ixvii. God be merciful unto us, and bless us, etc. Then shall be said or sung the Apostles' Creed by the Minister and the 'people, standing : I believe in God the Father Almighty, etc. .-Ind after that, the iicople all devoutly kneeling, the Minister shall jironounce vnth a loud voice. The Lord be with you. Answer. And with thy spirit. Minister. Let us pray. Then the Priest shall say, () Lord, sliew Thy mercy upon us, etc. etc. etc. Then shall follow three Collects. The first of the day ; the second for Peace ; the third fur aid against all perils, as hereafter followeth; lohich two last Collects shall be daily said at Even- ing Prayer without alteration. The second Collect at Evening Prayer. O God, from Whom all holy desires, etc. Tlie third Collect for Aid against all Perils. Lighten our darkness, etc. Here may follow an Anthem or Hymn. A Prayer of Saint Chrysostome. Almighty God, Who hast given us grace, etc. 2 Corinthians xiii. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, etc. Here cndcth the Shortened Order of Evening Prayer. THE PEEFACE. "TT hath been the wisdom of the Church of England, ever since the first compiling of her Publick Liturgy, to keep the mean between the two extremes, of too much stiffness in refusing, and of too much easiness in admitting any variation from it. For, as on the one side common experience sheweth, that where a change hath been made of things advisedly established (no evident necessity so requiring) sundry inconveniences have thereupon ensued; and those many times more, and greater than the evils that were intended to be remedied by such change : So on the other side, the particular Forms of Divine worship, and the Eites, and Ceremonies appointed to be used therein, being things in their own nature indifferent, and alterable, and so acknowledged ; it is but reasonable, that upon weighty and important considerations, according to the various exigency of times and occasions, such changes and alterations should be made therein as to those that are in place of Authority should from time to time seem either necessary or expedient. Accordingly we find, that in the Reigns of several Princes of blessed memory since the Reformation, the Church, upon just and weighty considerations her thereunto moving, hath yielded to make such alterations in some particulars, as in their respective times were thought convenient : Yet so as that the main Body and Essentials of it (as well in the THE PREFACE, [a.d. 1G62.] This was placed before the Book of Common Prayer, with a special regard to the circumstances of the times, the country having just emerged from the Great Kebellion, and the Church of England from a very great persecution. Under such circumstances it is impossible not to admire the tem- perate and just tone which characterizes it throughout. Tlie writer of this Preface was Sanderson, Bishop of Lin- coln, who was probably chosen on account of qualifications such as would fit him for composing in this tone an explana- tion of the course which it had been necessary to take, and which had been taken, with reference to the Book of Com- mon Prayer. He is, and was then, well known for his works on Conscience, and on the Obligation of an Oath : and he was looked up to with great respect by all parties in those days of religious division. " For the satisfying all the dissenting brethren and other," says Walton, in his Life of Bishop fiatidcrson, "the Con- vocation's reasons for the alterations and additions to tlie Liturgy were by them desired to be drawn up by Dr. Sanderson, which being done by him, and approved by them, was appointed to be printed before the Liturgy, and may be now known by tliis Title, The Pre/ace, and begins thus, It hath been the wisdom of the Clttirch, itc" In the Acts of the Upper House of Convocation it is recorded that " on Monday the 2nd of December, the Preface or Introduction to tlie Common Prayer Book was brought in and read." It was referred to a Committee composed of Wren, Bishop of Ely; Skinner, Bishop of O.xford ; Henchman, Bishop of Salis- bury; and (jriffith. Bishop of St. Asaph, and some amend- ments were made in it as it passed through their liands. Jirsl compilinij] This is a phrase which could hardly have dropped from Sanderson's exact pen. No doubt tlie period referred to is that of the Reformation ; but as every page of the following work will shew, the change wliich then took place in the Divine Worship of the Church of England was founded on offices which were re-formed out of the old ones, not "compiled" in any true sense ; and that the addition of "first" to the word adopted is calculated to misrepresent the true origin of our "publick Liturgy." in their own natun: indifferent] This and other apologetic expressions of the Preface must be read by the light of con- temporary history. But it is undoubtedly true that in. their oum nature, Rites and Ceremonies are " indill'crent. " Their importanc'C arises from the relation in which they are placed with reference to God as the Object of worship, and man as the worshipper of God. That relation being established, what was indift'erent in its own nature becomes of high import through the new character wliich is thus given to it, alterable] In the 34th Article of Religion this statement is more elaborately set forth : "Of the Traditions of the Church. — It is not necessary that Traditions and Ceremonies be in all places one, and utterly like ; for at all times they have been divers, and may be changed according to the diversities of countries, times, and men's maimers, so that nothing be ordained against God's Word. Whosoever through his private judgment, willingly and purposely, doth openly break the traditions and ceremonies of the Church, which be not repug- nant to the Word of God, and be ordained and approved by common authority, ought to be rebuked openly, (that others may fear to do the like, ) as he that offendeth against the com- monorderof theChurch, andhurteththe authority of the Magis- trate, and woundeth the consciences of the weak brethren. "Every particular or national Church hath authority to ordain, change, and abolish, ceremonies or rites of the Church ordained only by man's authority, so that all things be done to edifying." those that arc in place of Authority] Who are the properly authorized persons may also be known from the 20th Article of Religion : "Of the Authority of the Church. — The Church hath power to decree Rites or Ceremonies, and authority in Controversies of Faith : And yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, tliat it bo repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church be a witness and a keeper of holy Writ, yet, as it ought not to decree any thing against the same, so besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation. " As will be seen from the Historical Introduction to tliis volume, this principle ^^■as carried out liy throwing the whole responsibility of revising the older Prayer Book on the Con- vocations of Canterbury and York, which oliioially represented the Church of England. Statutable authority was given to the work of the C^iurch by the Crown in Parliament, in 14 Carol. II. c. 4. The jirinciplo is further enunciated in the succeeding words of the Preface, where the "Princes" or reigning Sovereigns are named, but the whole work of revision during their respective reigns is attributed to the Church, which "upon just and weighty considerations her thereunto moving, hath yielded to make such alterations in some par- ticulars, as in the respective times of those sovereigns wore thought convenient." Cbe Preface. 97 chiefest materials, as in the frame and order thereof) have still continued the same unto this day, and do yet stand firm and unshaken, notwithstanding all the vain attempts and impetuous assaults made against it by such men as are given to change, and liave always discovered a greater regard to their own private fancies and interests, than to that duty they owe to the publick. By what undue means, and for what mischievous purposes the use of the Liturgy (though enjoined by the Laws of the Land, and those Laws never yet repealed) came, during the late unhappy confusions, to be discontinued, is too well known to the world, and we are not willing here to remember. But when, upon His Majesty's happy Restoration, it seemed probable, that, amongst other things, the use of the Liturgy also would return of course (the same having never been legally abolished) unless some timely means were used to prevent it ; those men who under the late usurped powers had made it a great part of their business to render the people disaffected thereunto, saw themselves in point of reputation and interest concerned (unless they would freely acknowledge themselves to have cn-ed, which such men are very hardly brought to do) with their utmost endeavours to hinder the restitution thereof. In order whereunto divers Pamijhlets were published against the Book of Common Prayer, the old Objections mustered up, with the addition of some new ones more than formerly had been made, to make the number swell. In fine great importunities were used to His Sacred Majesty, that the said Book might be Revised, and such Alterations therein, and Additions thereunto made, as should be thought requisite for the ease of tender Consciences: whereunto His Majesty, out of his pious inclination to give satisfaction (so far as could be reasonably expected) to all his subjects of what persuasion soever, did graciously condescend. vain attempts and impettions assaults] The unreasonable conduct of those who opposed the restoration o£ the Church and her devotional system was scarcely more conspicuous than the fierce energy by which it was characterized. For four months these "impetuous assaults " were carried on iu the Savoy Conference ; and abundant evidence was given that "private fancies and interests" had much stronger in- fluence than the public good. Baxter, the chief leader of the opposition, composed a substitute for the Prayer Book wliich dissenting congregations could not be got to use, any more than the Churcli of England could be prevailed on to adopt it ; and yet on such a private fancy as this most of tliat bitter opposition centred. Nor must it be forgotten tliat "private interest " was deeply concerned, since the constitutional restoration of the Cliurch and the Prayer Book necessarily involved the restoration of the surviving clergy to the bene- fices which men who were not priests of tlie Church of England had wreuclied out of their hands. These facts are referred to simply to shew that the expressions here used in the Preface are not those of bitterness or controversy, but plain liistorical statements of what actually occurred ; and which it was necessary to mention for the sake of explana- tion, as ordered by Convocation. Tlie general attitude of the Puritans towards the Prayer Book is indicated by such words as these: "By daily familiarity and reading of this Book of Common Prayer, so corrupted and transformed by Bishops, we abate and cool iu our devotion, cast water upon our zeal, quench the Spirit, practise a standard temptation, prove a sad occasion to tlie godly, build uj) that we have destroyed, and entangle our- selves agiiin in the yoke of bondage. " [Search of God's Wrath on Cathedrals, 1644.] divers Pamphlets '] The most important reply to these 1 It may be interesting and nseful to api»end the titles of some of these pamplilets that were published before December, l*3(tO : — The Old Noncon/onnist, touching the Book of Common Prayer and Cere- monies. 4to. 40 pp. 1660. Presbyterial Ordination vindicated ...» with a brief discourse concern- ing imposed Forms of Prayer and Ceremonies. 4to. 48 pp. 16(30. Eiusttts Junior, by Josiah Webb, Gent., a serious detester of the dregs of the Anti-c.hristian Hierarchy yet remaining among us. 4to. 1660. [The autlior was supposed to be a Romanist.] The Jud'pnent of Foreign divines, as well from Geneva as other parts, touching the Discipline, Liturgy, and Ceremonies of the Church of England. With a letter from Calvin to Knox on the same subject. 4to. 1660. Reasons showing the necessity of Refcmntition of the public doctrine. Offered to the consideration of Parliament by divers Ministers of sundry Counties of England, 4to. 1660. The Common Prayer unmarked, 4to. 1660. Tlie Common Prayer Book no Divine Service; or, a small Curb to the Bishops' Career, etc. By Vavasour Powell. 4to. 1660. Beams of former Light, discovering how evil it is to impose doubtful and disputable Forms and Practices upon Ministei-s. 4to. 1660. Reasons shovnng the Necessity of the Reformation of the Public Doctrine, Worship, Rites and Ceremonies. Church government and discipline. Re- puted to be (but indeed are not) established by Law. By Cornidius Burges. 4to. 1660. pamphlets, next to the Prayer Book itself, was "A Collection of Articles, Injunctions, Canons, Orders, Ordinances, and Constitutions Ecclesiastical, witli other Public Records of the Church of England ; chiefly in the times of K. Edward Vlth, Q. Elizabeth, and K. James. Published to ^-indicate the Church of England, and to promote Uniformity and Peace in the same. And liumbly presented to the Convoca- tion." This collection was made by Dr. Sparrow, afterwards Bishop successively of Exeter and Norwich. It was pub- lished in 1661, and was a kind of legal or constitutional sequel to a well-known work which he had printed in De- cember, 1660, "A Rationale upon the Book of Common Prayer, wherein that Service is vindicated from the grand accusation of Superstition, by showing that it is a Reasonable Service, and so not Superstitious." (jreat importunities] This refers to tlie deputations sent to the King before and after he came into England, by the Presbyterians ; which led to the Savoy Conference. The word " persuasion " was introduced at this time to indicate one or tlie other side of those who supjiorted and those who opposed the Prayer Book. for the ease of tender Consciences] It was the practice of the Puritans to represent that they had tender consciences, but that Cliurclinien had no consciences worth considering. The Bishops at the Savoy Conference took an opportunity of vindicating the supporters of the Prayer Book iu the follow- ing plain-spoken language, which is a rejily to the Exceptions of the Puritans against it : — "It is no argument to say that multitudes of sober pious persons scruple the use of it, unless it be made to appear by evident reasons that the Liturgy gave the just grounds to make such scruples. For if the bare i^retence of scruples be suffi- cient to exempt us from obedience, all law and order is gone. "On the contrary, we judge that if the Liturgy should be altered, as is there required, not only a multitude, but the generality of the soberest and most loyal children of the Churcli of England would justly be offended, since such an alteration would be a virtual confession that this Liturgy were an intolerable burden to tender consciences, a direct cause of schism, a superstitious usage {upon which pretences it is liere desired to be altered) ; which would at once botli justify all those which liave so obstinately separated from it, as tlie only pious teuder-conscienced men, and condemn all those that have adhered to that, in conscience of their duty and loyalty, with their loss or hazard of estates, lives, and fortunes, as Smectyltimins Rediviviis. 4to. 1660. A Treatise of DiviTie Worship. Tending to prove that the Ceremonies imposed upon the Ministers of the Gospel iu England in present Contro- versy, are in their present use unlawful. Printed" 1604. 4to. 1660. [" Excei»tions against the Common Prayer" was not printed until 1601, after the King had yielded to the "importunities" referred to; and was not therefore one of these pamphlets.] 98 Cf)C Preface. In which review we have endeavoured to observe the like Moderation as we find to have been used in the like case in former times. And therefore of the sundry Alterations proposed unto us, we have rejected all such as were either of dangerous consequence (as secretly striking at some established Doctrine, or laudable Practice of the Church of England, or indeed of the whole Catholick Church of Christ) or else of no consequence at all, but utterly frivolous and vain. But such alterations as were tendered to us (by what persons, under what pretences, or to what purpose soever so tendered) as seemed to us in any degree requisite or expedient, we have willingly, and of our own accord assented unto : Not enforced so to do by any strength of Argument, convincmg us of the necessity of making the said Alterations : For we are fully persuaded in our judgements (and we here profess it to the world) that the Book, as it stood before established by Law, doth not contain in it any thing contrary to the Word of God, or to sound Doctrine, or which a godly man may not with a good Conscience use and submit unto, or which is not fairly defensible against any that shall oppose the same ; if it shall be allowed such just and favourable construction as in Common Equity ought to be allowed to all Human Writings, especially such as are set forth by Authorit3^ and even to the very best Translations of the holy Scripture itself Our general aim therefore in this undertaking was, not to gratify this or that party in any their unreasonable demands ; but to do that, which to our best understandings we conceived might most tend to the preservation of Peace and Unity in the Church ; the procuring of Reverence, and exciting of Piety, and Devotion in the publick Worship of God ; and the cutting off occasion from them that seek occasion of ca%al or quarrel against the Liturgy of the Church. And as to the several variations from the former Book, whether by Alteration, Addition, or otherwise, it shall suffice to give this general account. That most of the Alterations were made, either first, for the better direction of them that are to officiate in any part of Divine Service ; which is chiefly done in the Kalendars and Kubricks : Or secondly, for the more proper expressing of some words or phrases of ancient usage in terms more suitable to the language of the present times, and the clearer explanation of some other words and phrases, that were either of doubtful signification, or otherwise liable to misconstruction : Or thirdly, for a more perfect rendering of such portions of holy Scripture, as are inserted into the Liturgy ; which, in the Epistles and Gospels especially, and in sundry other places, are now ordered to be read according to the last Translation : and that it was thought convenient, that some Prayers and Thanksgivings, fitted to special occasions, should be added in their due places ; particularly for those at Sea, together with an office for the Baptism of such as are of riper years : which, although not so necessary when the former Book was compiled, yet by the growth of Anabaptism, through the licentiousness of the late times crept in men superstitious, schismatical, and void of religion and con- science. " [Cardwell's Coti/ p. 336.] In which revieio WE have endeavoured] This is the language of men who were sure of the ground, constitutional and eccle- siastical, upon which they were treading. Tliey could speak as the Church of England, because the Convocations of Canter- bury and York faithfully represented her. Cal/wlick Church of Chrift] This is one of many places in which the position of the Church of England towards the Catholic Church is taken for granted as sound and firm. Another such has been pointed out already in the Title-page of the Prayer Book. frivolous and vain] It is very remarkable to see how trifling these objections, officially made at the Savoy Confer- ence, often were. One of them was to the reading of any part of the liurial Service at the grave, as the minister was sure to catch cold by doing so. The Bishops replied that a cap would remedy this inconvenience ; and this was the reply given by the Di.ssenting Ministers : which, though long, is inserted as being very characteristic of the tone of the whole objections that were offered : "We marvel that you say nothing at all to our desire (that it be expressed in a Kubrick, that prayers and exhortations there used, be not for tlie benefit of the dead, but only for the instruction and comfort of the living). You intend to have a very indiscreet Ministry, if such a needlesso Circumstance may not be left to their discretion. The con- trivance of a Cap instead of a Ruhr, sheweth that you are all unacquainted with the subject, of which you speak : and if you speak for want of experience of the case of souls, as you now do about the case of men's bodies, wo could wish you some of our experience of one sort (by more converse witli all the members of the flock) though not of the other. But we would here put these three or four Questions to you. "1. Whether such of ourselves as cannot stand still in tlu^ cold winter at the grave, half so long as the Office of Burial requireth, without the certain hazard of our lives (though while we are in motion we can stay out longer), are bound to believe your Lordships, that a Cap wiU cure this better than a Ruhr., though we liave proved the contrary to our cost? and know it as well as we know that cold is cold. Do you think no jilace but that which a cap or clothes do cover, is capable of letting in the excessively refrigerating air ? "2. Whether a man that hath the most rational probability, if not a moral certainty, that it would be his death, or dangerous sickness (though he wore 20 caps) is bound to obSy you in this case ? " 3. Whether usually the most studious, laborious ministers, be not the most invaletudinary and infirm ? and "4. Whether the health of sucli should be made a jest of, by tlie more healthful ; and be ma9." Bnt it contains only the Morning and Evening Prayer, the Litany, the Collects, and the Catechism. A complete Greek version was made by Dean Diirel in 1G64, and dedicated to Archbishop Sheldon. It was printed in very small-sized type and volume by Field, the University printer. PRIVATE SAYING OF THE SERVICES DAILY BY THE CLERGY. The second paragraph of the above Appendix to the Preface of 1549 enjoins tlie Clergy to say the Daily Offices constantly either privately or openly, unless hindered by some urgent cause. This direction has undergone the following changes : — 1549. Neither that any man shall be bound to the saying of them, but such as from time to time, in Cathedral and Col- legiate churches, pa- rish churches, and chapels to the same annexed, shall senx' the congregation. 1.5o'2. And all priests and deacons shall be bound to say daily the Morning and Evening Prayer, either privately or openly, except they be letted by px'each- ing, studying of di- vinity, or by some other urgent cause. 166-2, And all priests and deacons are to say daily the Morn- ing and Evening Prayer, either pri- vately or openly, not being let by sickness, or some other urgent cause. In the Scotch Prayer Book of 1637 the words were added, "of which cause, if it be frequently pretended, they are to make tlie bisliop of the diocese, or the archbishop of the pro- vince, the judge and allower." Bishop Cosin also added to "ui'gent cause," "which the Bishop of the Diocese shall approve." But the present fonn appears to be that which he ultimately adopted, and that which was accepted by the Committee of Revision. There were, however, in the original MS. of the Prayer Book, after "privately or openly," tlie words "when conveniently they may," and these words have been crossed out with tlie pen, on what authority, or by wliom, is not known. This rule was regarded by Bishop Cosin, as he tells us in his notes to the Prayer Book [Works, vol. v. p. 9], as a con- tinuation of the ancient rule of the unreformed Church ; and such has been the opinion of most sound writers since his time. The Letters Patent attached to the Latin Prayer Book of Queen Elizabeth confirm this \-iew ; and so also does tlie practice of many holy clergymen at every period since the Reformation. The principle of it is that the Clergy are bound to offer the prayers of the Church daily to the glory of God, and as intercessors for their flocks, whether any come to join them in the offering or not. Such private recitation of the daily offices is, however, only to be used when the better way of " open prayer " with a congregation cannot be adopted. PUBLIC SAYING OF THE SERVICES DAILY. The third paragraph of the above rule very clearly enjoins the use of Daily Service. Bishop Cosin wished to define the hours at which it was to be said within certain limits, by add- A.M., et Petro Goldsmith Medd. A.M. Presbyteris, Collegii UiiiversiUtis in Ac-ad. Oxon. Sooiis, Latine Redditus. Rivington, Loudini, Oxonii, Can- tabiigiae. 1869. Editio Altera. ing to "a convenient time before he begin," — " which may be any hour between six and ten of tlie clock in the morning, or between two and six of the clock in the evening:" and although liis alteration was not adopted, it serves to shew us wliat were tlien considered the canonical limits of the times for Mattins and Evensong. The Laity should never allow their Clergy to find the House of (iod empty when they go tliere to carry out tliis most excellent rule of the Church. In the fifteenth Canon, which directs "the Litany to be read on Wednesdays and I'riday s, " there is an injunction which shews in what manner the practice of Daily Service ought to be kept up by tlie Laity as well as the Clergy: "The minister, at the accustomed hours of service, shall resort to the Church and Chapel, and, warning being given to the people by tolling of a bell, shall say the Litany prescribed in the Book of Common Prayer; wlureunto we wish every kouseliohler (hoelliny tril/iin half a mile of the Chureh to come, or send one at the least of Ids limifcliohl, fit to join with the Minister in prayers. " It was undoubtedly tlie intention of the first Reformers, and of all wlio at any time revised our Services, to have them useil daily, Morning and Evening, openly in the Church, by the Clergy and as many of the Laity as may be alile to attend. Many endowments have been left for assisting to caiTy out this intention of the Church ; and tlie jiractice has been kept up in some parish Churches (as well as in the Cathedrals) without any break, except during the persecution of the seventeenth century. In 1724, when the population of London was only one-sixtli of wliat it is at the present time, there were seventy-five Churches open daily for Divine Service ; and there are many proofs that the same diligence in prayer was used in the country as well as in large cities. Such continual public acts of Divine Worship are expedient for various reasons. [1] It is due to the honour of Almighty God that the Church in every place consecrated to His service should begin and end the day by rendering Him a service of praise. [2] Each Church and parish being a corporate centre and corporate whole, prayer for God's grace and His mercy should be offered morning and evening, for the body which the Church and such congregation as can assemble represents. Thus the Divine Presence is drawn down to the Tabernacle tliat It may thence sanctify the whole Camp. [3] The bene- fit to the Clergy is very great, of offering Divine Worship, prayer, and intercession, in the presence of, and in company with, some of their flock. [4] There are advantages to those \\'\\n frequently join in Divine Service which can only be fully known by experience, but which will then be appreciated as blessings not othenvise to be obtained. [5] The service of the Sanctuary is the most real and true form of that daily ilorning and Evening worsliip for which Family Prayer has been originated as an imperfect substitute ; for it is the tnie Common Prayer [see p. 82] of the Church offered in the Name of Christ by two or three gathered together under His authority, and according to His ordinance. It may be noticed that the Act of Uniformity enjoins that the Common Prayer shall be said on Sundays and Holy Days, and on all other Days ; and that the title of our Morning and Evening Ser-vice is, "The Order for Morning or Evening Prayer daily throughout the year. " In the beginning of the " Form of Prayer to be used at Sea " there is also this rubric, "IT The Morning and Evening Service to be used daily at Sea, shall be the same which is appointed in the Book of Common Prayer." And the next rubric is, "These two fol- lowing Prayers are to be also said in Her Majesty's Navy every day." OF CEREMONIES, WHY SOME BE ABOLISHED, AND SOME RETAINED. /^F such Ceremonies as be used in the Church, ^^ and have had their beginning by the insti- tution of man, some at the first were of godly- intent and purpose devised, and yet at length turned to vanity and superstition : Some entered into the Church by undiscreet devotion, and such a zeal as was without knowledge ; and for because they were winked at in the beginning, they grew daily to more and more abuses, which not only for their unprofitableness, but also because they have much bhuded the people, and obscured the glory of God, are worthy to be cut away and clean rejected: Other there be, which although they have been devised by man, yet it is thought good to reserve them still, as well for a decent order in the Church (for the which they were first devised) as because they pertain to edification, whereunto all things done in the Church (as the Apostle teacheth) ought to be refeiTed. And although the keeping or omitting of a Ceremony, in itself considered, is but a small thmg, yet the wilful and contemptuous transgression and breaking of a common order and discipline is no small offence before God. Let all things be done among you, saith S. Paul, in a seemly and due order : The appointment of the which order ijertaineth not to private men ; therefore no man ought to take in hand, or presume to appoint or alter any publick or common order in Christ's Church, except he be lawfully called and authorized thereunto. OF CEREMONIES. This justification of tlie course taken at tlie Reformation with respect to the Ceremonial part of Divine Worship was probably written by Archbishop C'ranmer, being included in some early lists of his works. It was originally inserted at the end of the Prayer Book, and was followed by some ritual directions reprinted below. In 1552 the part "Of Cere- monies " was placed after the Preface, and these ritual direc- tions were omitted. "Certain Notes for l/w more plain Explication and decent Ministration of Tkinrjs contained in this Bool: "In the saying or singing of Matins and Evensong, baptiz- ing and burj'ing, the Minister, in parish churches and chapels annexed to the same, shall use a surplice. And in all catlie- dral churches and colleges, the Archdeacons, Deans, Provosts, Masters, Prebendaries, and Fellows, being Graduates, may use in the quire, beside their surplices, such hood as pertaineth to their several degrees which they have taken in any univer- sity within this realm. But in all other j^laces, every minister shall be at liberty to use any surplice or no. It is also seemly, that Graduates, when they do preach, should use such hoods as pertaineth to their several degrees. "U And whensoever the Bishop sliall celebrate the holy Communion in the church, or execute any other public minis- tration, he shall have upon him, beside his rochette, a surplice or albe, and a cope or vestment ; and also his pastoral staff in his hand, or else borne or holden by his chaplain. "H As touching kneeling, crossing, holding up of h.ands, knocking upon the breast, and other gestures, they may be used or left, as every man's devotion scrvcth, without blame. "% Also upon Chri-stmas D.ay, Easter D.ay, the Ascension Day, Whit-Sunday, and the feast of the Trinity, may be used any part of Holy Scripture hereafter to be certainly limited and appointed, in the stead of tlie Litany. "^ If there be a sermon, or for other great cause, the Cur- ate, by his discretion, may leave out the T,itany, Gloria in Excclsis,' the Creed, the Homily, and the Exhortation to the Communion." 1 Tlic oniisMinn of this is not quite ho Btranf;c as it seems nt flrnt ; *' Ab A'lvcntn Domini usque nd Nativitfltem ejus [ab Septna^'csima u.sqtle in Canam Domini, cap. xlvii.], Te Dcum IjitidauinK, Gtnria in KxreUia Deo, He missa est, dimittiinus, quia major gloria Novi Te.st.'>ini;uti, <|uani Vetcris, There was a rubric printed at the beginning of the Com- munion Service relating to the same subject : and as all three documents are of the same date [.4.D. 1549], it also is here reprinted, so as to bring them under one view : — " H Upon the day, and at tlie time appointed for the minis- tration of the holy Communion, the Priest that shall execute the lioly ministry, shall put upon him the vesture appointed for that ministration, that is to say, a white albe plain, with a vestment or cope. And where there be many Priests or Deacons, there so many shall be ready to help the Priest in the ministration, as shall be requisite ; and shall have upon them likewise the vestures appointed for their ministry, that is to say, albes with tunicles. " The subject of Ceremonies being dealt with at large in the Ritual Introduction, it is not necessary to go into much detail respecting this document ; but a few notes are annexed point- ing out the principles which actuated the Reformers of 1549 as they are indicated in tlieir explanation or apology. institution of 7nai>] The distinction implied in these words shews that Arclibishop Cranmer and his associates did not consider themselves at liberty to alter any ceremonies of Divine institution, such as the Laying on of Hands, or the breaking of the Bread in the Consecration of the Holy Eucha- rist. turned to vanity and superstition} The primitive love-feasts and the kiss of peace are illustrations of this assertion ; so also is the excessive use of the sign of the Cross, which provoked a recoil equally superstitious, leading to the too general disuse of it. Some entered . . . by undiscreet devotion] Of such a kind were the ceremonies connected with images, and even with relics. These ceremonies were prompted, in tlic first instances, liy the best of feelings ; but, in the course of time, acts and words of veneration towards the saints of God became per- verted into usages which can hardly be distinguished from idol.atry, .and thus "obscured the glory of God"- instead of presenting it more clearly to the eyes of His worshippers. cnjiLs typvnn infra Advcntuni Domini observainua." fSIirnoLoous tk Kcc. Ohscrt'at. cap. xxx.] It was 1il;ewise omitted in Septuapesima and on Innocents' Day. Tliere was also a limitation of its use on Palm Sunday, "in Kcclcsiis in qiiibns chri.sma conficitur, et non in aliis" [DrBANP. linlion. div. off. vi. 7.5. 2) ; and one of the (Irst rubrics in the Sacramentar>- of St. Gregory is, " Qnnnflo vero Litania agitur, ncque Gloria in Excelsis Dro, neqne Allolnia eanitnr." ' Afu. Ep. 00 ad Januariunj, c. six. § 3.1 (.'il. Ep. 119). SDf Ceremonies. 107 And whereas in this our time, the minds of men are so divers that some think it a great matter of conscience to depart from a piece of the least of their Ceremonies, they be so addicted to their old customs ; and again on the other side, some be so new-fangled that they would innovate all things, and so despise the old that nothing can like them but that is new : It was thought expedient, not so much to have respect how to please and satisfy either of these parties, as how to please God, and profit them both. And yet lest any man should be offended, whom good reason might satisfy, here be certain causes rendered why some of the accustomed Ceremonies be put away, and some retained and kept still. Some are put away because the great excess and multitude of them hath so increased in these latter days that the burden of them was intoler- able ; whereof S. Augustine in his time com- plained that they were grown to such a number that the estate of Christian people was in worse case concerning that matter than were the Jews. And he counselled that such yoke and burden should be taken away as time would serve quietly to do it. But what would S. Augustine have said if he had seen the Ceremonies of late days used among us, whereunto the multitude used in his time was not to be compared ? This our excessive multi- tude of Ceremonies was so great, and many of them so dark, that they did more confound and darken, than declare and set forth Christ's benefits unto us. And besides this, Christ's Gospel is not a Cere- monial Law (as much of Moses Law was), but it is a Religion to serve God, not in bondage of the figure or shadow, but in the freedom of the spirit ; being content only with those Ceremonies which do serve to a decent Order and godly Discipline, and such as be apt to stir up the dull mind of man to the remembrance of his duty to God by some notable and special signification whereby he might be edified. Furthermore, the most weighty cause of the abolishment of certain Ceremonies was. That they were so far abused, partly by the superstitious blindness of the rude and unlearned, and partly by the unsatiable avarice of such as sought more their own lucre than the glory of God, that the abuses could not well be taken away, the thing remaining still. But now as concerning those persons which peradventure will be offended for that some of the old Ceremonies are retained still. If they consider that without some Ceremonies it is not possible to keep any Order, or quiet Disci- pline in the Church, they shall easily perceive just cause to reform their judgements. And if they think much that any of the old do remain, and would rather have all devised anew : Then such men granting some Ceremonies convenient to be had, surely where the old may bo well used, there they cannot reasonably reprove the old only for their age, without bewraying of their own folly. For in such a case they ought rather to have reverence unto them for their antiquity, if they will declare themselves to be more studious of unity and concord than of innovations and new- fangleness, which (as much as may be with true Some are put aivay because the great exces/i] Tlie minute directions given in the rubrics of the old Service-books often occupy page after page, while the prayers to whicli they are annexed occupy only a few lines ; and it must be a matter of grave doubt, wliether any more than a small fraction of the ceremonies latterly used in the celebration of the Holy Eucha- rist were intelligible to any but experienced priests. Their excess had become insupportable both to the Clergy and tlie people, and the meaning of many had quite passed away. Nor is there any reason to doubt the assertion that many ceremonies were so abused through ignorance on the one hand, .and corniption on the other, ' ' that the abuses could not well be taken away, the thing remaining still ;" a state of things had in fact grown up which reciuired strong measures for its reformation. lohereof S. Augustine in his time complained] St. Augustine's words are as follows : "I cannot, however, sanction with my approbation those ceremonies which are departures from the custom of the Church, and are instituted on the pretext of being symbolical of some holy mystery ; although, for the sake of avoiding offence to the piety of some and tlie pugnacity of others, I do not venture to condemn severely many things of this kind. But this I deplore, and have too much occasion to do so, that comparatively little attention is paid to many of the most wholesome rites which Scripture has enjoined ; and that so many false notions everywhere prevail, that more severe rebuke would be administered to a man who should touch the ground with his feet bare during the octaves (before his baptism), than to one who drowned his mtellect in drunken- ness. My opiition therefore is that wherever it is possible, all tliose things should be abolished without hesitation which neither have warrant in Holy Scripture, nor are found to have been appointed by councils of bishops, nor are confirmed by the practice of the universal Church, but are so infinitely various, according to the different customs of different places, that it is with difficulty, if at all, that the reasons which guided men in appointing them can be discovered. For even although nothing be found, perliaps, in which they arc against the true faith ; yet the Christian religion, which God in His mercy made free, appointing to her sacraments very few in number, and very easily observed, is by these burden- some ceremonies so oppressed that the condition of the Jewish Church itself is preferable : for although they have not known tlie time of their freedom, they are subjected to burdens imposed by the law of God, not by the vain conceits of men. The Church of God, however, being meanwhile so constituted as to enclose much chaff and many tares, bears with many things; yet if anything be con- trary to the faith or to holy life, she does not approve of it either by silence or by practice." [Aug. Ep. Iv. 35.] But noto as concerning those perso7is] Extreme and super stitious opinions against ceremonies were beginning to be as great a trouble to the Church as the extravagant and super- stitious use of them had been. The principles here enunciated against the enthusiasts who held them are: [1] That some ceremonies are absolutely essential to the order and decency of Divine Service. [2] That to invent new ones altogether would be as presumptuous as unnecessary. [3] That the old ones which were retained under the new system of the Church of England were of an edifying kind. [4] That the cere- monies retained were never likely to be abused as those which were set aside liad been. io8 HDf Ceremonies. setting forth of Christ's Religion) is always to be eschewed. Fui-thermore, such shall have no just cause with the Ceremonies reserved to be offended. For as those be taken away which were most abused, and did burden men's consciences without any cause ; so the other that remain are retained for a Discipline and Order, which (upon just causes) may be altered and changed, and therefore are not to be esteemed equal with God's Law. And moreover, they be neither dark nor dumb Ceremonies, but are so set forth that every man may understand what they do mean, and to what use they do serve. So that it is not like that they in time to come should be abused as other have been. And in these our doings we condemn no other Nations, nor prescribe any thing but to our own people only : For we think it convenient that every Country should use such Ceremonies as they shall think best to the setting forth of God's honour and glory, and to the reducing of the people to a most perfect and godly living, with- out error or superstition ; and that they should l>ut away other things which from time to time they perceive to be most abused, as in men's ordinances it often chanceth diversely in divers countries. we condemn no other Nations] This excellent sentence strongly illustrates the temperate spirit in whicli the official work of the Reformation of the Church of England was con- ducted. Recognizing tlie right which a national Church possessed to make such changes as may be expedient (subject to the retention of Catholic essentials), the Reformers acted upon it; but they also recognized it for other Churches as well as for that of England, and claimed to be tlie advocates of change and reconstruction only within the bounds of their legitimate jurisdiction. 80 sound a principle deserves the highest respect, and should be acted upon at all times. Had it been adliered to by the foreign party as well as by the official guides of the Reformation, a great schism would have been prevented. diversely in diirrs rountries] No doubt there are many Ceremonies used in the Eastern Church, and in southern countries of Europe, which seem unprofitable, and even worse, to persons brought up under a different system, and under different circumstances : but to those who use them they may be a true vehicle of adoration as regards Him Whom they worship, and of wholesome religious emotion as respects them- selves. St. Augustine's words on this point also might well have been quoted. "I am surprised, " he wrote to Januarius, "at your expressing a desire that I should write anything in regard to those ceremonies which are found dififerent in different countries, because there is no necessity for my doing this; and moreover, one most excellent rule must be observed in regard to these customs, when they do not in any way oppose either true doctrine or sound morality, but contain some incentives to the better life, viz. that wherever we see them observed or know them to be established, we should not only refrain from finding fault with them, but even recommend them by our iipproval and imitation, un- less restrained by fear of doing greater harm than good by this course, through the infirmity of others. " [Adg. Ep. Iv. 34.] THE ORDER HOW THE PSALTER IS APPOINTED TO BE READ. T^HE Psalter shall be read through once every Month, as it is there appointed, both for Morning and Evening Prayer. But in February it shall be read only to the Twenty-eighth or Twenty -ninth day of the Month. And whereas Jammry, March, May, July, August, October, and December have One-and- thirty days apiece; It is ordered that the same Psalms shall be read the last day of the said months which were read the day before : So that the Psalter may begin again the first day of the next month ensuing. And whereas the cxixth Psalm is divided into xxii. Portions, and is overlong to be read at one time; It is so ordered that at one time shall not be read above four or five of the said Portions. And at the end of every Psalm, and of every such part of the cxixth Psalm, shall be repeated this Hymn, Glory be to the Father, and to the Son ; and to the Holy Ghost ; As it ivas in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world ^vithout end. Amen. Note, that the Psalter followeth the Division of the Hebrews, and the Translation of the Great English Bible set forth and used in the time of King Henry the Eighth, and Edward the Sixth. THE PSALTER. Full notes on the Psalter will be found in the Introdnction to the Paalms. [a.d. 1871.] I [A.D. 1662.] THE ORDER HOW THE REST OF HOLY SCRIPTURE IS APPOINTED TO BE READ. 'T^HE Old Testament is appointed for the First Lessons at Morning and Evening Prayer, so as the most part thereof will be read every year once, as in the Calendar is appointed. The New Testament is appointed for the Second Lessons at Morning and Evening Prayer, and shall be read over orderly every year thrice, besides the Epistles and Gospels ; except the Apocalypse, out of which there are only twice, once in the morning and once in the even- ing, besides the Epistles and Gospels, except the Apocalypse, out of which there are only certain Lessons appointed at the end of the year, and certain proper Lessons appointed upon divers Feasts. And to know what Lessons shall be read every day, look for the day of the Month in the Calendar following, and there ye shall find the Chapters and portions of Chapters that shall be read for the Lessons, both at Morning and Evening Prayer, except only the moveable Feasts, which are not in the Calendar, and the immoveable, where there is a blank left in the column of Lessons, the Proper Lessons for all which days are to be found in the Table of Proper Lessons. If Evening Prayer is said at two different times in the same place of worship on any Sunday (except a Sunday for which alternative Second Lessons are specially appointed in the table), the Second Lesson at the second time may, at the discretion of the minister, be any chapter from the four Gospels, or any Lesson appointed in the Table of Lessons from the four Gospels. Upon occasions, to be approved by the Ordinary, other Lessons may, with his consent, be substituted for those which are appointed in the Calendar. And note. That whensoever Proper Psalms or Lessons are appointed, then the Psalms and Lessons of ordinary course appointed in the Psalter and Calendar (if they be different) shall be omitted for that time. Note also, That upon occasions to be appointed by the Ordinary, other Psalms may, with his con- sent, be substituted for those appointed in the Psalter. If any of the Holy-days for which Proper Lessons are appointed in the table fall upon a Sunday which is the first Sunday in Advent, Easter Day, Whitsunday, or Trinity Sunday, the Lessons appointed for such Sunday shall be read, but if it fall upon any other Sunday, the Lessons appointed either for the Sunday or for the Holy-day may be read at the discretion of the minister. THE SYSTEM OF THE LESSONS. There are many iiiflicatioim in the ivritinga of the Tnthera, in the Apostolical Canons and Constitutions, anil in othu"- Christian writings, that Scripture Lections or "Lessons" were in use in another form tlian in tliat of Eucharistic Gospels and Epistles, fiom the earliest .ages of the Christian Church. It may almost bo said to bo inevitable that the possession of so Cf)c System of tbc lessons. 1 1 1 Note also, That the Collect, Epistle, and Gospel ajjpointcd for the Suuday shall serve all week after where it is not in this book otherwise ordered. the rich a treasure as the Holy Scriptures of the Old au. 5 to v. 19. XXV. xxvi. iv. rxx. to u. 27. xxxii. „ xxxiii. »>. 2 to 11. 23. XXX. xxxii. Sundays after Christvias. The first. XXXV, xxx-viii. „ xl. xxxvii. xxxviii. ii. xlii. xliii. xliv. xii. xlul Sundays after the Epiphany. Tlic first. Ii. Iii. f. 13 and liii. „ liv. xliv. xlri. ii Iv. Ivii. ,, Ixi. Ii. liii. iii. Ixii. Ixv. „ Ixvi. Iv. Ivi. iv. Job xxvii. Job xxviii. „ Job xxix. hii. Iviil. V. Prov. i. Prov. iii. „ Prov. viii. lix. Ixiv. vi. ix. xi. XV. Ixv. Ixvi. Septuagesima. 1 Lesson. Gen. i. and ii. to v. 4. Gen. ii. V. 4 ,, Job xxxviii. Gen. i. Gen. ii. 2 Lesson. Rev. x\i. to f. 9. Rev. xsi. V. 9 to xxii. v. 6. Sexagesi-nio. 1 Lesson. Gen. iii. Gen. vi. „ Gen. viii. iii. vi. QuinguageMma. 1 Lesson. ix. to V. 20. xii. „ xiii. ix. to V. 20. xii. Sundays in Lent, Tlie first. 1 Lesson. xix. V. 12 to I'. 30. xxii. to V. 20 „ xxiii. xix. to 1'. SO. xxii. ii. xxvii. to i'. 41. xxviii. ,, xxxii. xxvii. xxxiv. iii. xxxvii. xxxix. „ xl. xxxix. xWi. iv. ,, xlii. xliii. ,, xiv. xliii. xiv. V. ,1 Exod. iii. Exodus v. „ Exodus vi. to V. 14. Exod. iii. Exod. V. vi. „ ix. X. „ xi. ix. X. 2 Lesson. Easter Day. 1 Lesson. Matt. xxvi. Luke xix. v.iS „ Luke . XX. V. 9 to 1'. 21. Matt. xxvi. Heb. v. to V. 11. Exod. xii. to V. 29. Exodus xii. V. 29 „ Exodus xiv. Exod. xii. Exod. xiv. 2 Lesson. Rev. i. V. 10 to V. 19. John XX. II. 11 totJ. 19 ,. Rev. V. Rom. vi. Acts ii. I'. 22. Sundays after Eastei: The first. 1 Lesson. Num. xvi. to V. 36. Num. xvi. V. 35 ,, Num. xvii, to V. 12. Num. xvi. Num. xxii. 2 Lesson. 1 Cor. XV. to V. 29. Jolm XX. V. 24 to 1'. 30. ii. 1 Lesson. Num. XX. to V. 14. Num. XX. 1'. 14toxxi. 1'. 10,, xxi. I'. 10. xxiii. xxiv. XXV. iii. 1, xxii. xxiii. ,. xxiv. Dent. iv. Deut. V. iv. Deut. iv. to V. 23. Deut. iv. V. 23 to V. 41 „ Deut. V. vi. vii. V. n vi. ix. ,, x. viii. ix. Sunday after Ascension Day. 1 Lesson. XXX. xxxiv. ,, Joshua i. xii. xiii. Whitsunday. 1 Lesson. xvi. to V. 18. Isaiah xi. „ Ezekiel xxx\-i. V. 25. xvi.tor.l8. Isaiah xi. 2 Lesson. Rom. viii. to i'. 18. Gal. V. i'. lij ,, Acts xviii. V. 24 to xix. Acts X. V. 34. Acts xix. to V. 21. Trinity Sutiday. [V. 21. 1 Lesson. Isaiah vi. to v. 11. Gen. xviii. ,, Gen. i. and ii. to v. 4. Gen. i. Gen. x^•iii. 2 Lesson. Rev. i. to V. 9. Eph. iv. to V. 17 ,, Matt. iii. Matt. iii. 1 John V. Sundays after Trinity. The first. Josh. iii. V. 7 to iv. v. 15. Joshua V. 11. 13 to vi. V. 21 ,, Joshua xxiv. Josh. X. Josh, xxiii. ii. Judges iv. Judges V. ,, Judges Vi. V. 11. Judg. iv. Judg. V. iiL 1 Sam. ii. to v. 27. 1 Sam. iii. „ 1 Sam. iv. to f. 19. 1 Sam. ii. 1 Sam. iii. iv. xii. xiii. „ Ruth i. xii. xiii. V. XV. to V. 24. xvi. ,, 1 Sam. xvii. XV. xvii. vi. 2 Sam. i. 2 Sam. xii. to 1'. 24 ,,2 Sam. xviii. 2 Sam. xii. 2 Sam. xix. vii. 1 Cliron. xxi. 1 Chron xxii. ,, 1 Chron . xxviii. to V. 21. xxi. Xliv. viii. xxix. V. 9 to V. 29. 2 Chron i. ,,1 Kings iii. 1 Kings xiii. 1 Kings xvii. ix. 1 Kings x. to V. 25. 1 Kings xi. tor. 13 xi. V. 26. xviii. xix. X. xii. xiii. ,, xvii. xxi. xxii. xi. xviii. xix. ,, xxi. 2 Kings V. 2 Kings ix. xii. xxii. to 11, 41. 2 Kings ii. to V. 16 „ 2 Kings iv. r. 8 to V. 38. X. xviii. xiii. 2 Kings V. vi. to V. 24 „ vii. xix. xxiii. xiv. ix. X. to V. 32 ,, xiii. Jer. V. Jer. xxii. XV. xviii. xix. ,, xxiii. to V. 31. XXXV. xxxvi. xvi. 2 Chron. xxxvi. Nehem. i. and ii. to v. 9 ,, Nehem. viii. Ezek. ii. Ezek. xiii. xvil. Jerem. v. Jerem. xxii. ,, Jerem. XXXV. xiv. xviii. XV iii. xxxvl. Ezekiel ii. „ Ezekiel xiii. to V. 17. XX. xxiv. xix. Ezekiel xiv. xviii. ,, xxiv. V. 15. Dan. iii. Dan. vi. XX. xxxiv. xxxvii. „ Daniel i. Joel ii. Micah vi. xxi. Daniel iii. Daniel iv. ,, v. Bab. ii. Prov. i. xxii. vi. vii. r. 9 ,, xii. Prov. ii. iii. xxiii. Hosea xiv. Joel ii. r. 21 ,, Joel iii. V. 9. xi. xii. xxiv. Amos iii. Amos V. ,, Amos ix. xiii. xiv. XXV. Micah Iv. andv.toii. 8. Mieah vi. ,, Micah vii. XV. xvi. xxvi. Habak. ii. Habak. iii. ,, Zeph. iii. xvii. xix. XXV ii. Eccles. xi. and xii. Haggai ii. to V. 10 „ Malachi iii. and iv. Note.— That the Lesson s appointed in the above Table for the Twenty-seventh Sunday after Trinity shall always be read on the Sunday next before" Advent. skill to give to it. And although such a pointedness is well adapted for educated and dovotioiially trained minds, it would not produce the effect desired upon mixed congregations, and was bettor fitted for monastic thau for popular use. Some changes in the direction of our present Lcctionary were made in the new and reformed editions of the Salisbury Portiforium, which were printed iu 1516 .and lijSI : and more extensively by Cardinal Quignonez in his Pefornied Roman Breviary (if 1,'),36. In tliis latter, lwi> Lessons were appointed for ordinary d.ays, one from tlie Old and another from the proper iLcssons 113 IT LESSONS PROPER FOR HOLYDAYS. 1871. 1662. 1871. 1662. Mnttins. Evemong. Uatiinta. | vemong. Matting. Evensong, Maltins. Evensong. V/ 4 lulivu) 1 Easier Evn. 1 Lesyon. Isa. liv. rsa. Ixv. to v. 17. Proverbs xx. Proverbs xxi. 1 Lesson, Zechariah ix. Hosea V. y. 8 to Zech. ix. Exodus xiii. John i, V. 35 to 1'. Johnxii. y. 20toi'. [vi. w. 4. St. Thomas. l-i;j. [42. 2 Lesson. Luke xxiii. y. 50. Rom. vi. to y. 14. Luke xxiii. v. 60. Hebrews iv. 1 Lessou. Job slii. tt> V. 1. Istiiah XXXV. xxiii. xxiv. Monday in Juhn XX. V. 19 to John xiv. to i;. 8. Easter Week. A'ativiti/ of Christ. [y. 24. 1 Lesson. Exod. XV. to 11.22, Cant. ii. v. 10. Exodus xvi. Exodus xvii. [u. 17. \v. 17. 2 Lesson, iyukcxxiv.toy.l3. Matt, xxviii. toy. Matt, xxviii. Acts iii. 1 Lusson. Isaiah ix. to v. 6. leaiah vii. w, lOto Isaiah ix. to v. 8, Isaiah vii. y. 10 to Tuesday in Easter Week. [10. 'Z Lesson. Luke ii. to v. 15. Tit. iii. i>, 4toy.y. Luke ii. to v. 15. Tit. iii. y. 4 toy. y. St. Stephen. [15 to U. liM. . 1 Lesson. 2 Kings xiii. y. 14 Ezek.xxxvii.toy. Exodus XX. Exodus xxxii. 1 Lesson. Gen. iv. to u. U. 2 Chron. xxiv. v. Proverbs xxviii. Ecclea iv. [y. B5. (to V. 21;, [IS. '2 Lesson. Acts vi. Acts viii. to V. 9, Acts vi. V. 8 and Acts Wi. V. 30 to 3 Lesson. John xxi. to v. 15. John xxi. V. 15. Lukexxiv.toy.13. I Cor. XV. St John Evan- 1 [vii. to V. 30. St. Mark. gelist. I Lesson. 1 Lesson. Isaiah Ixii. v. S. Ezek. i. to v. 15. Ecclus. iv. Ecchie. V. ExoJ. xxxiii. V. B. Isaiah vi. Eccles. V. Eccles. vi. 55. Philii) and 'J Lenson. John xiii. u. 23 to Rev. i. Apoc. i. Apoc. xxii. James. Innocentx' J^uy. [v. .S6. [y. 31. 1 1 Lesson Isaiah Ixi. Zech. iv. vii. ix. 1 Lesson. Jcr. XKxi. to V. 18. Baruch iv. v. 21 to Jer. xxxi. toy. 18. Wisd i. 2 Lesson. John i. V. 43. John i. V. 43. Ci''ft(»icisiort. ■ Ascension Day. [v. 15. [16. 1 Lesson. CJon xvii. V. St. Dent, X. u. 12. Gen. xvii. Ueut. X. V. 12. 1 Lesson. Dan. vii. y. 9 to 2 Kings 11. to V. Deut. X. 2 Kings ii. '1 Lesson. Kom. ii. V. 11. Col. ii. y. 8 to V. Rom. ii Coloss. ii. 2 Lesson. Luke xxiv. v. 44. Hebrews iv. Luke xxiv. v. 44. Eph. IV. to V. 17. Kpiphany. (18. Monday in 1 Lesson. Isaiah Ix. Isaiah xlix. v. 1.1 Isaiah Ix. Isaiah xlix. WhUsiin Wttik. [v. 31. [u. 30. [to V. 24. 1 Lesson. Gen. xi. toy. 10. Num. xi. y. Itf to Gen. xi. to v. 10. Slum. xi. y. 16 to 2 Lesson. Luke ill. y. 15 to John ii. to v. 12. Luke iii. to y. 23. John ii, to y. 12. 2 Lesson. 1 Cor. xii. to v. 14. 1 Cor. xii. y. 27 & 1 Cor. xii. 1 Cor. xiv. to V. Conversion of [u. 23. Tuesday in [xiii. (26. St. Paul. [13. Whitsun ^Vetk. . 1 Lesson. Tsaiah xlix. to v. Jerem. i, to v. 11. Wisd. V. Wisd. vi. 1 Lesson. Joel ii. V. 21. Micah iv. to y. 8. 1 Sam. xix. v. 18. Deut. XXX. 2 Lesaon. GaL i. I'. U. Actsx.vvi. Ujv.21. Acts xxii. to V. 22. Acta xxvi. 2 Lesson. 1 Tliess. V. u. 12 1 John iv. to y. 14. 1 Thess. V. y. 12 1 John iv. to y, 14. Purification ofVus V. Mary. St- Barnabas. [to V. 24. [to y. 24. [17, 1 Lesson. Dent, xxxiii. tov. Nahum i. Ecclus. X. Ecclus. xii. 1 Lesson. Exod. xiii. to v. Haggaiii. toy. 10. Wisd. ix. Wisd. xii. (12. St MatthioM. til. :«. 2 Lesson. Acta IV. y. .-^1. Acts xiv. V. 8. Acts xiv. Acts XV. to V. 36. I LL'sson, 1 Sam. ii. V. 27 to Isaiah xxii. v. 15. x.i.t. EccluB. i. St. John Baptist. .\imwudation 1 Lesson. Mai. iii. to y. 7. Malachi iv. Malachi iii. Malachi iv. of our Ladij. 2 LessoD. Matt. iii. Matt. xiv. toy. 13. Matt. iu. Matt. xiv. toy. 13. 1 Lesson. Gou. iii. toy. 16. Isaiah Hi. v. 7 to Ecclus. ii. iii. St. Peter. [15. Ash Wednesday, (13. [u. 13. 1 Lesson. Ezck. iii. y. 4toy. Zech. iii. Ecclus. XV, Ecclus. xix. 1 Lesson. Isaiah Iviii. to v. Jonah iii. ^ 2 Lesson. John xxi. y. 15 to Acts iv. V. 8 to V. Acts iii. Acta iv. 2 Lesson. Mark ii. 0. la to Heb. sii,i'. 3 toy. St. James. [y. 23. t^;'- Monday bcfon (v. 23. {18. 1 Lesson. 2 Kings i. to, y. 16. Jer. sxvi. V. 8 to Ecclus. xxi. Ecclus. xxii. Easter. [v. 16. I Lesson. Lam. i. to v. 15. Lament, ii. v. 13. 2 Lesson. Luke ix. y. 51 to 2 Lesson. John xiv. to V. 15. John xiv. V. 15. St. Bartholomew. , [y. 57. T'lesday before 1 Lesson. Gen. sxvni. v 10 Deut. xviii. v. 15. xxiv. xxix. Easter. St. Matthetc. [to y. 18, 1 Les»ou. Lam. iii. to v. 34, Lament, iii. y.34. 1 Lesson. 1 Kings xix. v. 15. 1 Chron. xxix. to XXXV. xxxviii. 2 Lesson. John XV. to V. 14. John XV. V. 14. St. Micliael. [v. 20. Wednesday 1 Lesson. Gen. xxxii. Dan. X. V. 4. Gen. xxxii. Dan. X. y. 5. before Eaater. 3 Lesson. Acts xii. V. 5 to V. Rev. .\iv. y. 14. Acts xii. to y. 20. Jude y. 6 to y. 16. \ Lesson. Lam. jv. to v. 21. Dan. ix. v. 20. Uosea xiii. Iloseaxiv. St. Luke. [18. 2 Lesson. John xvi. to v. 16. John xvi. V. 16. John xi. V. 45. 1 Lesson, Isaiah Iv. Ecclus.sxxviii.to Ecclus. Ii. Jobi. Thursday SS. Simon and [V. 15. before EoAter. Jtide. [to y. 17. 1 Lesson. Hose.lxiii.toy.lS. Hosea xiv. iDiiuiel ix. Jercni xxxi 1 Lesson, Isaiah xxviii. y. 9 Jerem. iii. v. 12 Job xxiv. & XXV. xiii. 2 Lesson. John xvii. John xiii, toy, 36. 'Jolin xiii. All Saints. 1 [to y. 19. Good Friday. [liii. 1 Lesson. Wisd. iii. to V. lo.Wisd. v. to y. 17. Wisd. iii. toy. 10. Wisd. V. to V. 17. 1 Lesson. Gen. xxii.toy.20. Isaiah Iii. v. 13 & Geu. xxii. toy. 20. Isaiah liii. 2 Lesson. Heb. xi. V. 33 & Rev. six. to v. 17. Heb. xi. y. 33 4 Apoc. xix. to V. 2 Lesson. John xviii. 1 Peter ii. John xviii. 1 Peter ii. [xii. toy. 7.1 [xii. to V. 7. (17. New Testament ; and a third, generally from a Patristic Homily, for festivals. Tliese were about the length of our Epistles and Gospels, or somewhat longer than most of them. In the Prayer Book of 1549 our present system of Daily and Proper Lessons was established, both being indicated in the Calendar, except iu the case of the moveable festivals, wlien tlie chapter and verse for Mattins were referred to before the Introit (wliich preceded the Collect, Epistle, and Gospel iif the day), and for Evensong after the Gospel. There were no Proper Lessons for ordinary .Sundays, tlie books of Holy Scripture being read continuously on those as well as on week-days : ' nor were there so many Proper Lessons for festi- vals as there now are. When Queen Elizabeth restored the use of the Prayer Book 1 It is observable that tlie Sunday Proper Lessons again break up that orderly system of reading the books of Holy Scripture through which is spoken of in the Preface. More than a hundred chapters of the Old Testa- ment are thus displaced and omitted every year. in 1559, the Tables of Proper Lessons were introduced, which were nearly identical witli those now in the Prayer Book ; and tliey were settled in the form in whicli they remained for two centuries in 10'61, all tlie changes being written in the margin of Bishop Cosin's Durham Prayer Book. The cycle of the Sunday Proper Lessons appears to have been formed in illustration of God'.s dealings with tlie Church of the Old Testament, though this idea is sometimes subordi- nated to the season, as in tlie Lessons for some of the Sundays in Lent. That for the other Holydays (with a few exceptions) is made up out of the didactic books of the Old Testament and the Apocryplia, and is not connecteil in any way with the Sunday cycle. The accidental combination of the fixed cycle of Proper Lessons with the variable one of the Second Lessons sometimes throws a wonderful flood of light upon both the Old and New Testament Scriptui'es : and it may be doubted wliether any equal advantage would be gained by the substi- tution of Proper Lessons from the latter for tlie present system of reading it in order. 114 Proper Psalms. IT PROPER PSALMS ON CERTAIN DAYS Mattbis. Psalm xix. xlv. Ixxxv. Psalm vi. xxxii. xxxviii. Psalm xxii. xl. liv. Evensong Psalm Ixxxix. ex. cxxxii. Psalm cii. cxxx. cxliii. Psalm Ixix. Ixxxviii. Easter Day Mattuis, Psalm ii. Ivii. cxi. Psalm viii. XV. xxi. Psalm xlviii. Ixviii. Evensong. Psalm cxiii. cxiv. cxviii. Psalm xxiv. xlvii. cviii. Psalm civ. cxlv. Asli Wednesday . .. Ascotsion Day Whitsunday PROPER PSALMS. The only days for wliich Proper Psalms were ajipoiiited previously to 16(31, were Cliristmas Day, Easter Day, Ascen- sion Day, and \\'liitsuu Day. Those for Ash Wednesday and Good Friday were then added ; and they appear, with the following other important additions to the Table, in the margin of the Durliam Prayer Book of Bishop Cosin. Additional Proper Psalms projiosed hy Bishop Cos Mattins. Evensong. Psalm ii. Ixvii. xii. xiii. cvii. xxviii. xlii. viii. xix. xxxiii. xxxiv. Ixxx. xci. i, XV. Ixxxiv. xci. Psalm Ixxii. xcvii. Ixxxvi. xc. xlvi. Ixx. ciii. civ. cxliv. ciii. civ. cxlviii. cxii. cxiii. cxix. 1st part, cxlv. cxlix. Rogation Monday ^ Rogation Tuesday Rogation Wednesday St. Michael and All Angels All Saints" Day The following Table is also included among the alterations proposed to be made in the Prayer Book by the Convocation of Canterbury of 1879 : — Proper Psalms on certain Days. Advent Sunday Christmas Day Circumcision Epiphany Purijication Ash Wednesday Annunciation Thursday he/ore Easter Good Friday Easter Even Easter Day Ascension Day Whitsun Day Trinity Sunday St. Micliael and Atl Angels All Saints Psalm viii. I. xix. xlv. Ixxxv. viii. xl. xc. xlvi. xlvii. Ixvii. xx.xlviii. Ixxxiv. vi. xxxii. xxxviii. Ixxxix. xxiii. xxvi. xlii. xliii. xxii. xl. liv. iv. xvi. xvii. ii. Ivii. cxi. viii. XV. xxi. xlviii. Ixviii. xxix. xxxiii. xlvi. xxxiv. xci. i. xxxiii. xxxiv. EvnNSONG. ex. Psalm xcvi xcvii. Ixxxix. cxxxii. xcii. ciii. Ixxii. cxvii. cxxxv. Ixxxvii. xciii. cxxxiv.cxxxviii. . ■ cii. cxxx. cxliii. cxiii. cxxxi. cxxxii. cxli. cxiii. cxliii. — Ixix. Ixxxviii. — xxxi. xlix. — cxiii. cxiv. cxviii. — xxiv. xlvii. cviii, — civ. cxlv. — xciii xcvii. xcix. — ciii. cxlviii. — cxlvi. cxhii. cxlix. Note.— The Psalms for Christmas Day may he used on the Sunday after Christmas, unless it be the Feast of the Circumcision ; and the Psalms for Easter Day and .Vscension Day may be used on the Sunday next following those Festivals respectively. A very full list of Proper Psalms and Lessons for special occasions was put fortli by Bishop Wordsworth at tlffe Diocesan Synod held in Lincoln in tlie year 1871, and as the Tables contain suggestions tliat may be useful to many readers of this work they are here, by permission, printed entire. Proper P.salm.s axd Proper TjEssons for Special Occasions. As put forth by the Ordinari/ in the Synod held at Lincoln, on Se],ter,iber 20, 1871. Table /.—Proper P.^jai.m.s for Special Occasions. For Advent Sunday. All or any of the following may be used : — Mattins — P».alm xviii. Ixxxii. xcvi. Evensong — Psiilm xcvii. xcviii. ex. cxliii. 1 In Bislinp Coain'fl M.S. note the Pofration Psalnig arc all included under Mattins. From a dilt'crencc in the appearance of the numeral.^ wliieh arc See also below, in Table II. , Psalms for the Third Service on Sundays in Advent. These may be used also at Morning Prayer, or Evensong, on tliose Sundays. For the Festival of Circumcision, or New Year's Day. Mattins — Psalm i. xx. ciii. Evensong — Psalm xL cxiii. cxliv. Any of these Psalms may be used on Neiv Yea7-'s Eve, and Psalm xc. For the Festival of the Epiphany. Mattins — Psalm ii. xix. or xxix. xlv. Evensong — Psalm Ixxii. Ixxxvii. xcvi. For the Purijication of the Blessed Virgin Mary, or the Presentation of Christ in the Temple. Mattins — Psabu xv. xxiv. xl. Evensong — Psalm xlviii. cxxxi. cxxxiv. For the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Mattins — Psalm viii. xix. Ixxxix. Evensong — Psalm ex. cxxxi. cxxxii. cxxxviii. For Palm Sunday, or Sunday before Easter. Any of the following may be used : — Mattins — Psalm v. xx. xxi. cxviii. Evensong — Psalm xl. ex. cxii. cxiii. cdv. For Thursday before Easter. Mattins — Psalm xxiii. xxvi. xli. Evensong — Psalm xlii. xliii. cxvi. For Easter Even. Mattins — Psalm iv. xvi. xxxi. xlix. cxiii. Evensong — Psalm xvii. xxx. ixxvi. xci. For Ilonday after Easter. Mattins — Psalm liv. Ixxii. Ixxxi. Evensong — Psalm xcviii. xcix. c. For Tuesday after Easter. Mattins — Psalm ciii. cviii. cxi. Evensong — Psalm cxiv. cxv. cxvi. cxvii. For Monday in ]\'liitsun Week. Mattins — Psalm viii. xix. xxvii. xxix. Evensong— Psalm xxxiii. xlvi. xlvii. xlviii. For Tuesday in Whitsun Week. Mattins — Psalm Ixv. Ixxvi. Ixxvii. Evensong — Psalm xcvi. xcvii. xcviii. ciii. For Trinity Sunday. Mattins — Psalm viii. xxix. xxxiii. Ixvii. Evensong — Psalm xciii. xcvi. xcvii. xcix. For the Festival of St. Michael and All Angels, September 29. Mattins— Psalm viii. xxiv. xxxiv. xci. Evensong — Psalm xcvii. ciii. xlviii. hero placed under F.vensouK, it is evident they were written in afterwards, iiiid in till' wrnni,' column, hy mistake. The others are all written as they are printed above. Proper psalms. 115 All Saints' Day, November 1. Any of the following may be used : — Mattius— Psalm i. xi. xv. xvi. xx. xxx. xxxiii. xxxiv. Ixi. Ixxix. Ixxxiv. Evensong— Psalm xcii. xcvii. cxii. cxxxviii. cxli. cxlvii. cxlviii. oxlix. On Days of Apostles and other Festivals. When the Psalms in the Daily Order are less appropriate, any of the following may be used, at the discretion of the Minister : — Psalm xix. xxxiv. xlv. xlvi. Ixi. Ixiv. Ixviii. Ixxv. xcvii. xcviii. xcix. ex. cxiii. cxvi. cxxvi. For the Consecration of Churches ; or Anniversaries of their Consecration, and for the Reopening of Churches after Restoration. Any of the following may be used ; — Psalm xxiv. xxvii. xlv. xlvi. xlvii. xlviii. Ixxxiv. Ixxxvii. c. cxviii. cxxii. cxxxii. cxxxiii. cxxxiv. cl. For the Consecration of Churchyards. Psalm xxxix. xc. For Harvest Festivals. Ally of the following may be used : — Psalm Ixv. Ixvii. Ixxxi. ciii. civ. cxxvi, cxxvii. cxxviii. cxliv. cxlv. cxlvii. For School Festivals. Psalm viii. xxiii. xxxiv. cxix. {?>. 1 to 17), cxlviii. For Choral Festivals. Psalm xxxiii. xlvii. Ixxxi. xcii. xcvi. xcviii. cviii. cxlii. cxlvii. cl. For Ember Days. Psalm cxxi. cxxii. cxxiii. cxxv. cxxvi. cxxx. cxxxi. cxxxii. cxxxiii. cxxxiv. For Rogation Days. Psalm Ixi. Ixii. Ixiii. Ixiv. Ixv. Ixvi. Ixvii. ciii. civ. cxxvi. cxlvii. For Missionary Services. Psalm xix. Ixxii. cxvii. Also any of the Psalms appointed above for the Festival of the Epiphany. For Diocesan Synods, Visitations, or Ruridecanal ChajJtei'S. Psalm Ixviii. Ixxxiv. Ixxxvii. cxxii. cxxxiii. For Annual Festivals of Benefit Societies. Psalm cxii. cxxxiii. cxlv. At Confirmation. Psalm XV. xix. xx. xxiii. xxiv. xxvi. xxvii. xxxiv. Ixxxiv. cxvi. cxix. cxlviii. Table //.—Psalms which may be used at a Thikd Service ON Sundays and some Holydays. Sundays in Advent. I. Psalm xlv. xlvi. I III. Psalm xlix. I. II. ,, ix. X. xi. I IV. ,, xcvi. xcvii. xcviii. Christmas Day. Psabn ii. viii. Ixxxiv. Sundays after Christmas, Psalm Ixxxvii. xcvi. xcviii. Sundays after Epiphany. I. Psabn xlvi. xlvii. xlviii. I IV. Psalm xci. xcii. xciii. II. ,, Ixv. Ixvi. Ixvii. I V. ,, xcv. xcvi. xcvii. III. ,, Ixxxiii. Ixxxiv. | VI. ,, xcviii. xcix. c. Ixxxv. Septuagesima. Psalm civ. Sexagesima. Psalm xlix. xc. Qninqnagesima. Psalm xxviii. Ixxvii. Sundays in Lent. I. Psalm vi. xxv. xxxii. II. ,, xxxviii. li. III. ,, en. cxxx. IV. Psalm cxli. cxlii. cxliii. V. ,, xxii. VI. „ xl. xlv. Easter Day. Psalm iii. xxx. Ixxvi. xciii. Sundays after Easter. I. II. III. Psalm cxvii. cxviii. ,, xix. XX. xxi. ,, xcviii. xcix. c. IV. Psalm c.xi. cxii. cxiii. V. ,, Ixxx. Ixxxi. Ascension Day. Psalm ii. Ivii. ex. Sunday after Ascension. Psalm xciii. cxxxii. Whitsun Day. Psalm Ixxxiv. Ixxxv. cxxxiii. Trinity Sunday. Psalm xxxiii. xcvii. or cxlviii. cxlix. cl. Sundays after Trinity. I. Psalm i. ii. iii. XVII. Psalm xcii. xciii. 11. , IV. VI. Vll. xciv. III. , , xi. xii. xiii. XVIII. „ cv. xiv. XIX. „ cvii. IV. , xxv. xxvi. XX. „ cix. V. , , xxxiii. xxxiv. XXI. ,, cxiv. exv. VI. , , xxxvii. cxvi. VII. , , xliv. XXII. „ cxx. cxxi. VIII. , , bi. bii. liv. cxxiii. IX. , , Ivi. Ivii. Iviii. cxxiv. X. , , Hx. Ix. Ixi. XXIII. „ cxxv. cxx XI. , , Ixii. Ixiii. Ixiv. cxxvii. XII. , , Ixxi. cxxviii. XIII. , , 1 xxiii. cxxix. XIV. , Ixxiv. Ixxv. XXIV. „ cxxxiii. XV. , , Ixxix. Ixxx. cxxxiv. Ixxxi. cxxxv. XVI. , , Ixxxii. xxv. „ cxxxvi. Ixxxiii. cxxxvii. Ixxxiv. XXVI. „ exliv. cxlv XXVII. Psali 11 cxlvi. cxlvii. Table III. — Proper Lessons for Special Occasions. For Consecration of Churches. First Lesson — 1 Chron. xxix. , or 1 Kings viii. 22-62. Second Lesson — Heb. x. 19-26, or Mark vi. 11. For Reopening of Churches after Restoredion. First Lesson — 2 Chron. xxxiv. S-29, or Ezra iii., or Isa. Iviii., or Haggai ii. Second Lesson — Luke ii. 25-39, xix. 37; John ii. 13; Eph. ii., or Rev. xxi. For the Consecration of Churchyards. First Lesson — Gen. xxiii., or Job xix., or Isa. xxvi. Second Lesson — John v. 21, or 1 Cor. xv. 35; 2 Cor. iv. 8 to V. 11 ; 1 Thess. iv. 13 ; Rev. xx. For Rogation Days. First Lesson — Deut. viii., xxviii. 1-15; 1 Kings viii. 22-53; Prov. iii. ; Joel ii. 15. Second Le.sson — Matt. vi. 24, vii. 1-13; Luke xviii. 1-15; 2 Cor. V. 1-10; 2 Cor. ix. Ii6 ^oticablc JFcasts anU IDofpDaps. TABLES AND RULES FOR THE MOVEABLE AND IMMOVEABLE FEASTS, TOGETHER WITH THE DAYS OF FASTING AND ABSTINENCE THROUGH THE WHOLE YEAR. RULES TO KNOW WHEN THE MOVEABLE FEASTS AND HOLYDAYS BEGIN. EASTER DAY, on which the rest depend, is always the First Sunday after the Full Moon which happens upon or next after the Twenty-first Day of March ; and if the Full Moon happens upon a Sunday, Easier Day is the Sunday after. Advent Sunday is always the nearest Sunday to the Feast of - in Easter Week. and r in Whitsun Week. Tuesday ) Tuesday ' § The Table of Feasts. Tliis Table is not in Cosin's Devotions, thougli the days are all marked in the Calendar of the volume ; but it is iu MS. in the margin of his Durham Prayer Book. The remarks made by him in the Notes on the Prayer Book published in the fifth volume of his works shew that he had long wished to see a more complete list of the Holydays of the Churcli printed in the Calendar ; and that he thought the abbreviated list of former Prayer Books was the fault of the printer. But the same list that is now in the Prayer Book is found in an Act of Parliament of 1.552-53 [5 and 6 Edw. VI. ch. .3, sec. 1] with the exception of the Conversion of St. Paul, St. Barnabas, and "All Angels" in association with St. Michael. The omission of these was probably accidental. All the Feasts iu this Table have their own Collects, Epistles, and Gospels, and notices of the days wOl be found in the footnotes appended to these in their jiroper places. ii8 CJigils, jTasts, anD Dai^s of abstinence. A TABLE OF THE VIGILS, FASTS, AND DAYS OF ABSTINENCE, TO BE OBSERVED IN THE YEAK. The Eves or Vigils before The Nativitj' of our Lord. The Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin. Easter Day. Ascension Day. Pentecost. S. Matthias. The Eves or Vigils before until ) '^'S''* up with every edition of tlie Prayer Book as is the present custom, since they are of far too recondite a character to be of any use except to highly scientific students ; and for ordinary use the Table of Move- able Feasts is amply sufficient. agoocafalc jFcast0 I 21 A TABLE OF THE MOVEABLE FEASTS FOR THE REST OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, ACCORDING TO THE FOREGOING CALENDAR Year The The Sun- day Let- ter. A Sundays after Septua- The Fir.st Easter Rog.ation Ascension WTiitsiin Sundays afttr Advent of our Lord. Golden Number. Epact. Kpi- phany. Sunday. Lent. Day. Sunday. Day. Day. Trinity. Sunday. 1882 II 11 Four Feb. 5 Feb. 22 Apr. 9 May 14 May 18 May 28 Twenty-five Dec. 3 1883 III 22 a Two .Jau. 21 7 Mar. 25 Apr. 29 3 13 Twenty-seven 2 1884 IV 3 FE Four Feb. 10 27 Apr. 13 May 18 22 June 1 Twenty-four Nov. 30 1885 V 14 T> Three • 1 18 5 10 ■ 14 May 24 Twenty-live 29 1886 VI 25 Six 21 Mar. 10 25 30 June 3 June 13 Twenty-two 28 1887 VII 6 B Four • 6 Feb. 23 ■ -10 15 May 19 May 29 Twenty-four 27 1888 VIII 17 Aa Three Jau. 29 15 1 6 10 20 Twenty six Dec. 2 1889 IX 28 F Five Feb. 17 Mar. 6 -21 26 30 June 9 Twenty-three 1 1890 X 9 E Three n Feb. 19 • 6 11 • 15 May 25 Twenty-live Nov. SO 1891 XI 20 D Two Jan. 25 U Mar. 29 3 7 17 Twenty-six 29 1892 XII 1 CB Five Feb. 14 Mar. 2 Apr. 17 22 26 June 5 Twenty-tliree 27 1893 XIII 12 A Three Jan. 29 Feb. 15 2 7 11 May 21 Twenty-six Dec. 3 1894 XIV 23 G Two 21' 7 Mar. 25 Apr. 29 3 13 Twenty-seven 2 1895 XV 4 F Four Feb. 10 27 Apr. 14 May 19 23 June 2 Twenty-four 1 189G XVI 15 ED Three 2 19 ■ 5 10 14 May 24 Twenty-five Nov. 29 1897 XVII 26 C Five • 14 Mar. 3 18 23 27 June 6 Twenty-three 28 1898 xvm 7 B Four 6 Feb. 23 10 15 19 May 29 Twenty-four 27 1899 XIX 18 A Three Jan. 29 15 2 7 11 21 Twenty-six Dec. 3 1900 I G Five Feb. 11 28 ■ 15 20 24 June 3 Twenty -four 2 THE EPACT. The difference between the lengtli of the solar year and that of the lunar year is eleven days ; the solar year being made up of 365 days, and the lunar year of twelve months or moons, of twenty-nine and a half days each, or 354 days in all. The last day of the lunar year being the last day of the twelfth moon, and the last day of tlie solar year being the 31st of December, the difference between these constitutes the Epact.' In the first year of the present cycle the lunar year and the solar year both connnenced on tlie 1st of January ; the Epact for the second year was therefore 11, for the third 22, for the fourth 33, and so forth in a regular succession. Tlie n/iole months are not reclioned, however, and instead of 33, tlie Epact is taken as 3, instead of 36 as 6, and so fortli. A cycle of nineteen Epacts is thus formed which always runs parallel to the nineteen Golden Numbers in the follow- ing order:- Golden Numbers 1 2 3 1 4 5 1 6 1 7 8 1 9 10 11 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Epacts 1 11 22 3 14 25 6 17 28 9 20 1 12 23 4 15 26 V 18 The Epact is used for calculating the age of the moon on any day in any year. To do this, [1] Add together the day of the month and the Epact : [2] If the month is one later on in the year than March, add also the number of months in- cluding Marcli and the one for wliich the calculation is re- quired. The result will give the moon's age within a fraction of a day. Tlius : — 1865. October lOtli. 3 The Epact. 13 8 months from March to October, inclusive. Days 21 = approximate age of the raoou. 1 'E.TXXT3CI ruipitt. Iiitei'calavy day.s. The true age of the moon on October 10, 1865, at noon, being 20 days and 14 hours. Tlie use of the Epacts (in connection with the Sunday letters), for finding out Easter Day, may be thus illustrated for the year 1887. Find out the moon's age for some day on which Easter can fall, say April 1st. 1887. April 1 6 Epact. 2 March and April inclusive. Days 9 = age of the moon on April 1. The Paschal Full Moon is the 14tli day of the moon's age, and tliis will be April 6th. [2] Easter Day being the Sunday after the Paschal Full Moon, and B being the Sunday Letter for 1887, the first B after April 6tli will shew that April 10th is Easter Daj' in that year. 1 22 9@oi) cable jTcasts. A TABLE OF THE MOVEABLE FEASTS ACCORDING TO THE SEVERAL DAYS THAT EASTER - CAN POSSIBLY FALL UPON. Easter Day. Sundays after Sei>tuagesima The First Day Rogation Ascension Wliitsuii D.iy. Sundays after Advent Ejiiphauy. Sunday. of Lent. Sunday. Day. Trinity. Sunday. Mar. 22 Oue Jan. 18 Feb. 4 Apr. 26 Apr. 30 May 10 Twenty-seven Nov. 29 23 One 19 5 27 May 1 11 Twenty-seven 30 24 One 20 6 28 • 2 12 Twenty-seven Dec. 1 25 Two 21 7 29 3 13 Twenty-seven 2 26 Two 22 8 30 4 14 Twenty-seven 3 27 Two 23 9 May 1 5 15 Twenty-six Nov. 27 28 Two 24 10 o ■ 6 16 Twentj'-six 28 29 Two 25 11 3 7 17 Twenty-six 29 30 Two 26 12 4 8 IS Twenty-six 30 31 Two 27 13 5 9 19 Twenty-six Dee. 1 Apr. 1 Three 28 14 6 10 20 Twenty-six 2 2 Three 29 15 7 11 21 Twenty-six 3 3 Three 30 16 8 12 oo Twenty-five Nov. 27 4 Three 31 17 9 13 23 Twenty-five 28 5 Three Feb. 1 18 10 14 24 Twenty-five 29 6 Three 2 19 11 15 25 Twenty-five 30 7 Three 3 20 12 16 26 Twenty-five Dec. 1 8 Four 4 21 13 17 27 Twenty-five 2 9 Four 5 22 14 18 28 Twenty-five 3 10 Four 6 23 15 19 29 Twenty -four Nov. 27 11 Four 7 24 16 20 30 Twenty-four 28 12 Four 8 25 17 21 31 Twenty-four 29 13 Four 9 26 18 oo Juno 1 Twenty-four 30 14 Four 10 27 19 23 o Twenty-four Dec. 1 15 Five 11 28 20 24 3 Twenty-four o 16 Five 12 Mar. 1 21 25 4 Twenty-four 3 17 Five 13 o 22 26 5 Twenty-three Nov. 27 IS Five 14 3 23 27 6 Twenty-three 28 19 Five 15 4 24 28 7 Twenty-three 29 20 Five 16 5 25 29 8 Twenty-three 30 21 Five 17 6 26 30 9 Twenty-three Dec. 1 22 Six 18 7 27 31 10 Twenty-three o 23 Six 19 ■ 8 28 June 1 11 Twenty-three 3 24 Six 20 9 29 • 2 12 Twenty-two Nov. 27 25 Six • 21 10 30 3 13 Twenty-two • 28 Note, tl at in a Bisse A II 3 B 4 C X 5 D 6 E VIII 7 F VII 8 G 9 A XV 10 B IV 11 C 12 D XII 13 E I 14 F 15 G IX 16 A XVII 17 B VI IS 19 D 20 E 21 F 22 G 23 A 24 B 25 C The Golden Numbers iu the foregoing Calendar will point out the Day.s of the Paschal Full j\Ioons till the Year of our Lord 1900; at which Time, in order tli.at the Ecclesiastical Full Moons may fall nearly on the s.ame Days with tlie real Full Moons, tlie Golden Numbers must be removed to diiierent Days of the Calendar, as is done in the annexed Table, whicli contains so much of the Calendar then to be used as is necessary for finding the Paschal Full Moons, and the Feast of EaxUr, from the Year 1900 to the Year 2199 inclusive. This Table is to be made use of, in all respects, as the first Table before inserted, for finding Easier till tlie Year 1899. This Table is simply for reusing the first and third columns of that portion of the Calendar whicli extends over the Paschal limits, i.e. those days in March and April that Easter can possibly fall on. It will not come into use before tlie year 1900, and is then applicable for three hundred years. 124 ©cncral Cables. GENERAL TABLES FOR FINDING THE DOMINICAL OR SUNDAY LETTER, AND THE PLACES OF THE GOLDEN NUMBERS IN THE CALENDAR. TABLE I. 6 5 B C 1900 •2000 2100 2900 3000 3800 3900 4000 4700 4800 5700 6600 4900 5800 6700 6800 7500 7600 7700 etc. 8500 2200 3100 3200 2300 2400 3300 4100 5000 5900 GOOO 6900 4200 5100 5200 7800 6100 7000 7900 8000 o 1 ¥ G 1600 1700 2600 2500 3400 3500 3600 4300 4400 4500 5300 ■ 5400 6200 6300 6400 7100 7200 7300 8100 8200 A 1800 2700 2800 3700 4600 5500 5600 6500 7400 8300 8400 To find the Dominical or Sunday Letter for any given Year of our Lord, add to the year its fourth part, omitting fractions, and also the number, which in Table I. standeth at the top of the column, wherein t)ie number of liundreds contained in that given year is found ; Divide the sum by 7, and if there is no remainder, then A is the Sunday Letter; but if any number remaineth, then the Letter, which standeth under that number at the top of tlie Table, is the Sunday Letter. TABLE II. II. III. Years of our Lord. -1 B 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 .3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 4800 4900 5000 5100 9 10 10 10 11 12 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 16 II. IIL Years of our Lord. 5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100 7200 7300 7400 7500 7600 7700 7800 7900 8000 8100 8200 8300 8400 8500 etc. 15 16 17 17 17 18 18 19 19 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 24 24 25 25 26 26 26 27 28 27 28 29 29 29 To find the Month and Days of the Month to which the Golden Numbers ought to be prefixed in the Calen- dar, in any given Year of our Lord consisting of entire hundred years, and in all the intermediate years betwixt that and tlie next hundredth year following, look iu the secon<) ■ 3 13 27 A Two oo 8 B A* Two* . 23* 9* 26 30 4 14 27 B Two 23 9 C B* Two* 24* 10* 27 May 1 5 16 26 C Two 24 10 DC* Two* 25* • 11* 28 6 16 26 D Two 25 11 ED* Two* 26* ■ 12« . 29 3 7 17 26 E Two 26 12 F E* Two* 27* IS' 30 4 8 IS 26 r Two 27 13 G F* Three* 28* 14* . 31 5 9 19 26 G Three 28 14 AG* Three* 29* 16* Apr. 1 6 10 20 26 A Three 29 15 B A * Three* SO* 16' 2 • 7 11 21 26 B Three 30 16 C B* Three* 31* 17* S . 8 12 22 25 C Three 31 17 D C* Three- Feb. 1' 18* 4 9 . 13 23 25 D Three Feb. 1 18 E D* Three* 2' . 19* 6 10 14 24 25 E Three 2 19 F E* Three* 3* 20* . 6 11 16 25 25 F Three 3 ■ 20 G F< Four* 4' 21* 7 12 16 26 25 G Four ^— 4 21 A G* Four* 5* 22* 8 13 17 27 25 A Four 6 22 B A» Four* 0* 23* 9 14 18 ■ • 28 25 B Four 6 23 C B« Four* 7* 24* 10 15 19 29 24 C Four . 7 24 D C« Four* 8* 26* 11 16 20 30 24 D Four 8 25 E D * Four* 9* 26* 12 . 17 21 31 24 E Four . 9 26 F E* Four* 10* 27* 13 18 22 June 1 24 F Four 10 27 G P* Five* 11' . • 28* 14 19 23 2 24 G Five 11 28 AG* Five* 12* 29* 15 20 24 8 24 A Five 12 Mar. 1 B A* Five* 13' Mar. 1* 16 21 26 4 24 B Five 13 2 C B* Five* 14* 2* 17 22 26 5 23 C Five 14 3 D C* Five* 15* 3* 18 23 27 6 23 D Five 15 4 E D* Five* 16* 19 24 28 7 23 E Five 16 5 F E« Five* 17* 6* 20 25 29 8 23 F Five 17 6 G F* Six* 18* B* 21 26 30 9 23 G Six 18 7 A G* Six* 19* 7* 22 27 31 10 23 A Six 19 8 B A* Six* 20* 8" 23 28 June 1 11 23 B Six 20 9 C B* Six* 21* 9* 24 29 2 12 22 C Six 21 10 D C* Six* 22* lU- 25 SO 3 13 22 Advent Sunday. To find tlio (lays uiif)n wliidi the moveable Ilolytlays have heQw observed or are to be observed in any year, look for the year in the First Table and observe the number set beside it. Then look for the same number in the Ilrst eolunni of the Set^ond Table, against whieh you will lind a letter called the Sunday Letter, the number of Sundays after Epi]>hany and after Trinity, and the days of tho Calendar upon wliich the Ilrst day of Lent and the i)rincipal moveable Festivals fall. All the days in the Calendar to which the Kunday luctter is atllxed will be Wunduys. But note, that if the nuniber of the year in the First Table hnth a * set against it, that year is Bissextile or Leap Year, in wliieh ca.sc the month of February hath 29 days, and the Sunday Letters, the number of Sundays after Epiphany, the day upon which Seiituagesima Sunday is observed, and the day upon which the Ilrst day of Lent falleth, are all to br looked for in the Leap Year columns, wliich are likewise marked with a star *. In Lean Year there arc always two Sunday Letters, whereof the former is used in January and Febrnnry, and the latter for the rest of the year. Note also th'it in the year 1752, in wliich the Calendar was reformed and tho New Style be^'an, the day foUowiiiK Wednesday, September 2, was (-ailed Thursday, Scptemher 14, and therefore after September 2 the Sunday Letter was A instead of I>, and there wore only"25 Sundays after Trinity, and Advent Sunday was December 3. Note also that until 1752 tho year was reckoned in the Church of England as beginning Morcli 25, all days before March 25 being considered as part of the year prccedinK. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CALENDAR. The Ecclesiastical Calendar comprises two things : first, a table of the order of days in the year ; and, secondly, a cata- logue of the saints commemorated in the Church. To this, in the Book of Connnon I'rayer, tliere is also annexed a table of the daily lessons throughout the year. Calendars are known to liave been in use at a very early date in the Church. One of the Church of Kome was printed by Bouchier in his Connneiitari/ on the Paschal Cycle [Ant- werp, 1634], which was formed about the middle of the fourth century, or perhaps as early as A, D. 33{> ; and another is givuu by Maliillon in his Analecta, which was drawn up for tlie Cluirch of Carthage a.d. 483, and which is preserved in the Abbey of St. Germaiue de Pros, at Paris. Many others of early times are extant, and a number are printed by Martens in the si.xth volume of his Collection of Ancient Writer.^. The origin of Christian Calendars is clearly coeval with the commemoration of martyrs, which began at least as early as the martyrdom of Polycarp, a.d. 168. [Eu.seb. Eccl. Hist. iv. 15.] The names of these, and their acts, were carefully recorded by the Church in Martyrologies ; and Diptychs — tablets of wood or ivory — were inscribed with their names, to be read at the time when the memorial of the departed was made at the celebration of the Holy Eucharist. From one or both of these, lists of names would naturally be transcribed for use at other times, and as a memorial in the hands of private Christians, the names being placed against'the day on which the martyrs suffered, or that (generaUy the same) on which they were annually commemorated. To these two columns of the days of tho year and the names of the martyrs were afterwards added two others of Golden Numbers and Sunday Letters, the use of which has been explained in the notes to the Tables. Several very ancient English Calendars exist in our public libraries ; but the earliest known is one printed by Martene [Vet. Scrip, vi. 635], under tlie title "Calendarium Floria- cense," and attributed by him (with apparently good reason) to the Venerable Bede, with whose works it was found in a very old MS. at Fleury. Bede died at Jarrow, a.d. 735, so that this Calendar must date from the earlier half of the eighth century. There is a general agreement between this Calendar and the Martyrology of Bede which seems to shew that it is rightly attributed to him, and we may therefore venture to take it as the earliest extant Calendar of the Church of England, dating it from the latest year of Bede's life. It is printed month by month in the first column of the Compara- tive View of the Calendar in the following pages. In the course of ages the number of names recorded in the Martyrologies of the Church increased to a great multitude, as may be seen in the vast folio Acta Sanctorum, printed for every day of the year by the BoUandists, which was commenced more than two centuries ago, and is not yet nearly complete, thougli it extends to sixty large volumes. The Calendars of the Church also began to be crowded, although there was always a local character about them which did not belong to the Martyrologies. In the twelfth century the original method of recording the names of saints (which was by the Bishop of each Diocese in some cases, and in others by a Diocesan Council) was superseded by a formal rite of Canonization, which was performed only by the Popes ; and from this time the names inserted in tlie Calendar ceased to be those of Martyrs or Confessors only. The Calendar of the Church of England was always local in its character, and one of the eleventh or twelfth century, which is preserved in the Durham Chapter Lil)rary, seems to diifer but little from anotlier of the fifteenth century, which is contained in an ancient Missal of tliat Church, or from that which has been reprinted from a Missal of 1514, belonging to Bishop Cosin's Librarj', in the following pages. Com- paratively few names were added to the English Calendars during the mediceval period, though many were added to the Roman. Some changes were made in the Calendar by the "Abro- gation of certain Holydays" in the reign of Henry VIIL, great inconvenience being found to arise from the number of days which were observed with a cessation from labour ; and tho two days dedicated to St. Thomas of Canterbury being especially obnoxious to the King were altogether expunged, though l)y very questionable autliority. When the Englisli Prayer Book was set forth in 1549, it was thought expedient to insert only the chief of the names which had been contained in the Calendar of the Salisbury Use. Two of these were taken away (though the erasure of St. Barnabas was probably a printer's error), and four others added in 1552. In the following year, 1553, the old Salis- bury Calendar was reprinted (with three or four omissions) in the Primer of Edward VI., and in the "Private Prayers " of Queen Elizabeth's reign, printed in 1584 ; but not in any Book of Common Prayer. In 1559 the Calendar of 1552 was reprinted with one omission. These successive changes (as far as is necessary to illustrate the transition from the ancient to the modem Calendar) are represented in the following Table :— § Transition of the English Calendar from 1549 to 1559. Circumcision. \ Epiphany. Conversion of St. Paul. Purification of the Blessea Virgm Mary. St. Matthias. Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. St. Mark. — Philip and St. James. — John Baptist. — Peter. — James. — Bartholomew. — Matthew. — Michael. — Luke. — Simon and St. Jude. All Saints. St. Andrew. — Thomas. Christmas. St. Stephen. — John Evangelist. Innocents. ; St. Mary Magdalen. In Calendar of 1549 only. In Calendars of 1549,1552,11559. — Clement. — Barnabas. — George. — Laurence. Lammas. 1552 only. 1549 and 1559. 1552 and 1559. 1 In 1552 an Act of Tarliaraent was passed " for the keeping Holydays .and Fasting-days " [5 and 6 Edw. 'VI. c, 3]. Tliepre.imble runs : " Forasnmih as at all times men be not so mindful to laud and piaise God, so ready to resort and hear God's Holy Word, and to come to the Holy Communion and other laudable rites which are to be observed in every congregation as their bounden duty doth require, therefore, to call men to remembrance of their duty, and to help their infirmity, it liath been wholesomely provided that tliere should be some certain times and days appointed, wherein Christians should cease from all other kind of labours, and should apply themselves only and wholly unto tlie aforesaid holy works properly pertaining unto true religion ; . . . therefore as these works are most commonly, and a!so may weU be called God's service, so the times appointed specially for the same are called Holydays." The first clause then enacts "that all the days hereafter mentioned shall be kept and commanded to be kept Iloljdays, and none other ; that is to say, all Sundays in the year, tlie dajs of the feast of the Circumcision of our Lord Jesus Christ, of the Epiphany, of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin, of Saint JIatthie the Apostle, of .Saint Mark the Evangelist, of Saint Philip and Jacob the Apostles, of tlie Ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ, of the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist" [with all other Holydays as in the bracketed li.st above, until Innocents], " Monday and 'Tuesday in Easter Week, and Monday and Tuesday in 'Wniitsun Week, and that none other day shall be kept and conmianded to be kept Holyday, or to abstain from lawful bodily labour. " II. And it is also enacted by the .authority aforesaid that every even or day next going before any of the aforesaid days of tlie feasts of the Nativity of our Lord, of Easter, of the Ascension of our Lord, Pentecost, and the Purification and the Annunciation of the aforesaid Blessed Virgin, of ^Vll Saints, and of all tlie .said feasts of the Apostles (other than of Saint John the Evangelist, and Philip and Jacob) shall be fasted, and com- manded to be ke]it and observed, and that none other even or day shall be coiiimaiuled to be fasted." Tlie fifth clause provides for the observ.ince of Saturday as a fasted even when tlie feast falls on a Monday ; and tlie seventli for the observance of the usual solemnities on St. George's Feast. 128 an 3lntromiction to tt)c Calcnuar. It seems now to have been felt by persons in authority that greater reverence ougjit to be shewn for the names of those who had gloritied God in a special manner by their deaths or their lives, and in the Latin Prayer Book of 1560 nearly every day of the year was marked by the name of a saint, the list being compiled from the old Salisbury Calendar and the Roman. This appears to liave led, to the appointment of a Commission, consisting of the Arcli- bishop of Canterbury, the Bishop of London, Dr. Bill, and Walter Haddon, the compiler of the Latin Calendar just referred to. This Commission met in 1561, and, with a few changes in the Tables and Rules, made also a revision of the list of Saints. • , , In making this revision the compilers evidently took the same course which had been taken with respect to the Prayer Book itself, going back to tlie Sarum Missal and selecting from the old Calendar such names of Festivals as they tliought proper to be inserted in tlie new one. As regards the days dedicated to our Lord, the Blessed Yircin ilary, and theHoly Apostles, little change was made. The°only Festival of our Lord which they omitted was "The Feast of the Holy Saviour " [May 24th], a day which does not always occur in Sanim Calendars. Among the Festivals of the Blessed Virgin only that of the Assumption [August loth] was left out. Of the days on which the Apostles and other Saints of the New Testament were com- memorated before tlie Reformation there were omitted, St. Paul [June SOth], the Commemoration of St. Paul [June 30th], St. Peter's Chair [February 2i2nd], the Inven- tion of St. Stephen [August 3rd], and St. Michael of the Mount [October ICth]. The Minor Holydays were, however, greatly diminished in number, for out of one hundred and fifty-one which occur in the Sarum Calendars of Henry VIII. 's reign only forty- eight were restored by the revisers of 1561. On what prin- ciple they went can onlj' lie judged by the result, which the following Table of our existing Calendar (which contains fifty- one Minor Holydays), will shew. It seems a singular omis- sion that the names of two of our greatest national saints, St. Aidan and St. Cuthbert, should liave been overlooked both in 1561 and in 1661. The omission of St. Patrick is almost as extraordinary ; and it might have been expected that St. Thomas of Canterbury's name would have been restored when the bitterness of the Tudor times had passed away. The latter two names were always inserted in ordi- nary Almanacs which were not bound up with the Prayer § Saints commemorated by the Church of Enrjland. Tlie Holy Apostles, etc. The Blessed Virgin Mary. St. Michael and All Angels. All Saints. St. John the Baptist. St. Peter. St. James the Great. St. John the Evangelist. St. Andrew. St. Philip. St. Thomas. St. Bartholomew. St. Matthew. St. James the Less. St. Simon Zelotes. St. Jude. St. Matthias. St. Paul. St. Barnabas. St. Mark. St. Luke. St. Stephen. The Holy Innocents. St. Mary Magdalen. .St. Anne. JIartjTs ill the Age of Persecutions. St. TTicomede St. Dionysius the I Areopagite ( St. Clement ... St. Perpetua . . St. Cecilia St. Fabian St. Agatha St. Lawrence.. St. Cyprian ... St. Valentine . St. Prisca St. Margaret. . St. Lucian St. Faith St. Agnes St. Vincent.... St. Lucy St. Catharine . St. Crispin St. Blasius 90 96 100 203 2.'!0 250 251 258 258 270 275 278 290 290 304 304 305 307 308 316 Mai-tyrs .ind other Saints specially connected with England. St. George, M St. Alban, M St. Nicolas St. Benedict.: St. David St. Machutus St. Gregory St. Augustine of ) Canterbury ( St. Etheldreda St. Chad St. Giles Venerable Bede St. Boniface St. S within St. Edmund, K. & M... St. Edward, K. & M.... St. Dunstan St. Alphege, M St. Edward, K. & Conf, St. Hugh St. Richard 290 303 326 543 544 560 604 604 670 673 725 735 755 862 870 978 988 1012 1163 1200 12.-)3 French and other Saints not included among the preceding. St. Silvester St. Enurcluis St. Hilary of Poictiers, Confessor St. Ambrose St. Martin St. Jerome St. Augustine St. Britius St. Remigius St. Leonard, Confessor St. Lambert 335 340 368 397 397 420 430 444 535 559 709 Book, and are also found in some Calendars of Queen Eliza- beth's time. At the revision of 1661 the only change made was the inser- tion of the names of St. Alban, the Venerable Bede, and St. EnurchuH. These three names, together with the particular designations by which most of the Saints in the Calendar are now distinguished, are to be found in the Calendar pre- fixed to Bishop Cosin's Devotions : and as the first published edition of that work was printed in 1627, we may conclude that they were taken thence into the Rook of fnnimon Prayer at the Revision of 1661, as some of the Tables and Rules were In Calendars of the Church of England not printed in the Prayer Book, but publislicd by the Stationers' Company under the authority of the Archbishop of Canterbury,' the following names are also to be found : St. Patrick, St. Thomas of Canterbury, and All Souls. King Charles the First was likewise included among the Martyrs in all English Calendars until the special Form of Prayer for the 30th of January was given up in 1859. It will be seen that the whole number of individual Saints commemorated is seventy three. Of these, twenty-one are especially connected with our Blessed Lord ; twenty arc Martyrs in tlie age of jiersecutions ; twenty-one are specially connected with our own Church ; and eleven are either great 1 This nnthnrity onntimicd to \w pivrn :is Into fis 1S^2. an 31ntroDuctlon to tf)C CnfcnDar. 1 29 and learned defenders of tlie Faith, like St. Hilary and St. Angiistitie, or Saints of France, wliose names were proliably retained as a nieiiiorial of the ancient close connection between the Churches of I'' ranee and England. The (Calendar itself was not in any w.iy altered by the Act of Parliament of IT-Vi for tlie alteration of the style, tlie pri^sont tables of tlie months being a fairly exact reprint of tlioso in the .Sealed liooks. 'J'hey are here given from the Act, but are inserted after the Tables and Rules as in the Scaled Books. Tliis order was evidently adopted with tlie object of making a definite Festiv.al and I''erial division of this part of the Prayer P)Ook, instead of confusing tlie two divisions together as in tlie Act ; and wliile tlie iniprovcil text of the latter luas been adopted, it h.as been tliouglit better to t.akc the more convenient and more ecclesiastical arrangement (in this respect) of the former. in the " Comparative View " of each of the months, all the names in the Calendar of Bede, the Salisbury Use of ISU, and the Modern Roman, are represented ; but a selection only has been made from the Oriental Calendar, as the great majority of Eastern Saints are unknown to English readers, and their names would convey no information whatever. Those selected are chosen for the object of illustrating the points of similarity between the Calendars of East and West ; and they are taken from tlie Byzantine Calendar printed in Nk.\lk's ] nlroduflion lu llw llhlorij of the, Iltjhj Entlirn Church, vol. ii. p. 768. Some remarkable coincidences may be observed between it and the ('aleiidar of Bede, which help to confirm the tlieory of a direct connection between Englaml and the Oriental Church. In the Notes on the " Minor Holydays " great care has been taken to make them as complete as possible without oeeupy- ing too mucli space, and the reader's attention has been drawn to liistory r.ather tlian legend, except where the latter is neces- sary in order to understaml the special popularity or icono- graphy of any saint. The authority for dedications of eluirches has been The Calendar of the Aiujlkim Church Illuslrated, J. H. PAr.KEi;, IS'il, and nothing more than some approximation to the true numbers has been attempted. Those given will afford some idea as to the honour paid in England tu different saints, especially in the middle ages, dedications since I8.1I not being included. Eight Calend.ars have been selected fur comparison: Snriim, l.')!4, 1.521, 15.56: York and Hereford. Surtees Soc. edd. : Aherdeen. 1510; liomnn, 1582, collated with a MS. r'irc. 1400; PnriK, 1.543, printed by Grancolas ; Monastic, 1738 ; Austin Canons', 1546. Cf)c CalenDar toitb tbe Cable of lessons. s a o .«• 1 s :3;5 .£ >■■?■?■> .2 P.'P.'P'P, X X x^:S:3.- > ;» > 's.d x'x X . .^ Of g i 09 — :s :=.2 s- > K >! X X X .:=.-:■?. 2 . ._■ . X X X X X --S .j-r X xxxxx;5;SX,i ;3 -d X«!-JX«««WK XXXKXXXXX X t» > tt s .,i . • ri < Ed 1 .^ >'>'>"> .^ x'x'x 'x 'x X > > X X > X & s — ■-" xxxxxxxxx X X X X X X Pi s C3 .-• .:a J.jiS >"■> ;s i;:3 > >.s X X X X > .Sxxxxxxxx .S X X X X .- >-c -c xxxxx— ;;i3;:3.:C ,J- xxxxxxxxx X r3 -1- ^ "^ .-H IS r^ O :S > "H .2 > ^ Ei "S-^ •r ^ X ^ a o s ci CO _o " o 4a to c5 o ■ ■ "^ 3 _. «■ s o .£ X x'x'x'x 'x'x X X > > > > < o := .£.S: > > > > ^ >.;5 X X X X X &4 > .2 'xx > P.3XXXXXXX ^^-^oB _oB __^. . CI ^ c? e :S_> X y, y. X X y. y, X X x "^ "1 ^ O xxxxxxxxx X X X X X X n pH CO 1 0. « i CI CO 4^' CO . t- CO "^i 0^? 2 .06 .2 X x"x'x X x'xx 'x ci Sri " >H ■g . .^ .i .S !>■ >■■>■?■>■>■> .2 > > > > > < ^" -— X X X X X P5 Ch s " ■^' 1 ^ 55 o > •- 1 XOl . . . ^ X _■ Ci — r: . -• <1 a o o o .£ .S > > ;».E X X X X 1^ !-■ ir^ CI CI si 1-5 1-1 -^'^'. 5: a .^ ;3 .-; := > :> > X X xxxxxxxxx X o > >>xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx X X X X X X O ;.-* tJ C >> t,- >. ^ ■e>.-K s =3 S jSS a e t 1 g i a 8 a 1 o ° ^ & & ° -g "n .3 a S g) Cm pp •s •§ ^ ■5. § 3 c 5 = S ■=• 1 1 i © >j W (S: feo y j» ,Q •^5 § Fi^ Bki t^ CO i-i -o L-:) -*' cc Am^ ^ rt •313 I9 03 H QOOOOOOOQOO 00 5s in 00 6 0-* mPh p^ O-a o-e Q) MH bo-^ ^ w '^3 Q) '*-' bO< .a -d » •« M.4; ^ ■« » — M .2- 4J 43 CO .*j a, <1 a ^■ ^-a 0.5 !/3 ^ 5 ii)^ " o^ " to . *4-l -^ CJ S o o CQ r5 .— r7^ >> CO N^ CO t.* a '^ «-a =2 IS O 03 -P o (D -P a o Q a -a «■£ is o 04 M- o o JS 00 ^ ^ s 'S'^ a^ SCO . a a a -a <« to _ *; 4^ cB "^ 03 CC' M M OJ CO "a ."" . a '^^Sjs c a ■-, ^ 1 > «*H a ° .j'-j S o •)? coccH coO E'-a So pifS; 4^ 4J C/^ 4J 4i !Kco ajxcc (I4 cc s 9 ■a ■§ M a C8 >) CC -4^ -4^ +3 -fj -+3 +i r.- . a ^ a" «■ 5 S X b "^ O c> to 03 a 2 m 1* S to- 3 y} 4J +i MO! CO -3 O '-^ a <5 o tJl ^cico'^io^i-'COOio^c^cO'^io^t-^ooas » O a" i. Hh § -2 3 :i: y: p_j Hilary Felix. Maurus Marcell Antony Prisca. German Fabian Agnes. Vincent Emeren PhI-5 CO 43 43 4^ 4J 43 4J CO 'X' »: CO t» 'V; CO CO 43 43 43 CCOJCCOO j:; *:4i 02 1» < pa a o O .3 ■a a 4^ &i < U rt >, s d) j3 X ;2 c: 3 p-( .5 s a c3 s S .^;^ s s-^^-s.o ^ t-^ S S^ f* ^ y. P^ 1> 43 43 43 43 CO 43 43 X 73 73 03 tZ; CO IT) fe<5t C/! 43 43 CO CO CO a P5 O CO to CO ti5 ■*5 Ph m d 1 c Marcellu Antony. Prisca. Sebastia Agnes. Vincent. ■*3 43 43 43 43 43 02 CO .35 03 CO CO MCOCO g, 132 Cf)c 0@mor JJ)ol5tiap5 of 3lanuarp. 1] Circumcision of our Loku.— [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Bepresented— By a circle, or a dove holding a ring in its mouth. 6] EpiPH.iNV OF OUK LoKD.— [.See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Represented— By a star of Bethlehem ; by the three kings, or by three crowns. S] LuciAN, Priest and Maetyk.— This St. Lucian "of Beau vais " is not to be confounded with St. Luciau "of Antioch," priest and martyr, born, like the Roman satirist of the same name, at Samosata, a forerunner of St. Jerome in Biblical criticism, and occurring in the Roman JIartyrology on January 7th. The Sarum Calendar is the only medieval English one which contains either of them ; there we find St. Lucian and his companions on January 8th, as in the Parisian. The Roman Calendar contains neither Lucian. The Roman Martyrology says that at Beauvais, in Gaul, the Sth is the day of the holy martyrs Lucian, a presbyter, Maximian, and Julian, of whom the two last were slain with the sword of the per- secutors ; but blessed Lucian, who had come into Gaul witli St. Deuys, not fearing openly to confess Christ, after mucli slaughter was beheaded. Tliis was under Julian, the per- secuting Roman governor in Gaul, about A.D. 290. Little else is known of St. Lucian. It is said that he, St. Denys, and St. Quintin were tliree Roman missionaries who weut to Beauvais, Paris, and Amiens respectively. [Fabian, January 20th.] For the legend which would take St. Lucian back to sub- apostolic times, see St. Denys, October 9th. In a calendar of tlie ninth century he is called " Bishop," in accordance with which is the present tradition at Beauvais. Vincent of Beauvais, how- ever [a.d. 1244], speaks of him as priest and martyr. His ap- pearance in the Sarum Calendar has, perhaps, arisen out of the connection between the ancient British and Galilean Churclie-:. Calendars— Sa.ram, Paris. Churches dedicated in his name — None. Representnl—Coasecrciting on his own breast ; lying on potsherds in prison ; carrying his head in his hand. [.See October 9th.] 13] Hilary, Bishop and Confessor.— Another French Saint, styled "of Poictiers," and not to be confounded with Hilary "of Aries," who has been thought by some to have drawn up the " Athanasian " Creed, and who died a.d. 449. He occurs iu Sarum, Vork, and Hereford, as well as in the Roman Martyrology, on January 13tli, but in the Roman Calendar on the 14tli, having been transferred on account of the Octave of the Epiphany. Quignonez places him on tlie 31st; and some calendars, probably in reference to translations of his relics, on June 26th and November 1st. The particulars of his life are mostly to be gathered from his own writings. He was born at Poictiers, of heathen parents, and was con- verted and baptized in full age ; after which, about a.d. 353, he was chosen Bisliop of his native city. From the time of his ordination lie lived apart from liis wife. After tlie Arian Council at Milan [a.d. 3.55], which had condemned St. Athanasius, he wrote to the Emperor Constantius to remon- strate with Iiim for liis encouragement of heresy, but without success. Most of the (Jallican Bishops, however, remained faithful. The rest lield an Arian synod in Languedoc, wliere St. Hilary opposed tliem, refuting the Arian here.sj'. There- upon the Emperor baiiislied him to Phrygia in AD. 356, and cruelly persecuted the Gallican clergy, but in a.d. 357 the I'.ishops wrote to assure St. Hilary of tlieir fidelity. He also received a letter from Ids d.aughter Apra, whose touching story 13 related by Bisliop Taylor in his IIoli/ Dying. In a.d. 358 he wrote his work On Sipiods, in which he commends the orthodo.xy of the I'.ritish as well as of the (Jallican Bishops. Then also he wrote On the Trinity, against the Ariana, as well as some hymns. In a.d. 360 he was allowed to return to Ilia diocese, where he was received by the faithful with great joy. After a journey into Italy, where he held a public disputation coni;crning the Faith, to which he had been in- vited by the Emperor Valentinian, he returned to Poictiers, and there died [a.d. .368]. The British Bishops had been, in common with their Gallic neighbours, his devoted admirers, and had looked to him for guidance against the Ai-ians. The Sarum Breviary says he so abhorred the enemies of the Catholic Faith that he would not even salute them, but he did, iu fact, speak gently of them, hoping to win them back. " Hilary term " in the law courts used to begin on the 13th, after the Cliriatma,s v.-icatioii, but it now extends from .l.-inuary 11th to .lanuary 3)st. De.an Hoys ijuaintly remarks th.at "how- soever in the court of conscience there be some ])leading every day, yet the godly make it Hilary term all the year round." Calendars — All except Aberdeen. Dedications of Churches — Three. Represented — On an island among'serpents ; with three books, or a triangle, pen, staff, or trumpet ; with a child, sometimes in a cradle, at his feet. 18] Pri.sca, Roman Virgin and Martyr. — Prisca was a young Roman lady who suffered either under Claudius I. in the first century, or, more probably, under Claudius II. about A. D. 270. Her ' ' Acts " are not genuine, but there seems to be ground for believing that she suffered cruel tortures rather than sacrifice to idols, and that she was finally beheaded. It is said that an eagle defended her body from dogs until the Christians came and buried it. .Some true tale of Christian faith and fortitude no doubt underlies the uncertain accounts that have come down to us respecting those details of her suii'erings which are commemorated in works of art. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Ecclus. li. 9-12, St. Matt. xiii. 44-52.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Clinrches — None. Represented — With an eagle near her dead body ; with one or more lions near her, a sword, or a palm, in her hand ; an idol falling. 20] Fabian, Bi.shop of Rome and Martyr. — In most calendars St. Fabian occurs together with St. Sebastian the martyr, but they have no connection with each other beyond having the same "birthday." Eusebius says that Fabian was made Bishop of Rome in consequence of a dove alighting on his head while the election was going on ; and that although he was then comparatively little known, the supposed sign from heaven determined the unanimous choice of both clergy and people [a.d. 236]. The incident of the dove is related of .St. Gregory the Great and of other saints, and is perhaps a symbohcal expression of belief in the presence of the Holy Ghost. Having governed the Church fourteen years, during which he sent SS. Deuys, Lucian, and Quintin into Gaul [see January Sth], St. r.abian suffered martyrdom under Decius A.D. 250, and according to an ancient Latin register was buried ".in Callisti," i.e. in the Catacomb of Callistus, where his name is still to be seen with those of other early Bishops of Rome, thus : *ABIANOC Eni MP, Fabian, Bishop. Martin: [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Heb. xi. 33-39. St. Luke vi. 17-23.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — One (with St. .Seb.astianl. Represented — As a pope, with a dove, sword, or club ; kneel- ing at a block. 21] AuNEs, RoM.«i Virgin and Martyr. — All calendars have also " S. Agnetis ii." on the 28th, which, though called "Octa. Agnetis" in the Austin Canons' Calendar, is not, according to Baronius, an ordinary octave, but rather relates to an apparition of St. Agnes to her parents. She was born of Christian parents, and while yet at school was seen by a Roman youth, -nho sought her love. His pleadings and his ofi'ers of costly presents were alike unavailing, and he fell sick. The physicians finding that his disappointment was the cause of his sickness, the case ^^•as reported to .Sym- ]ihronius tlie Prefect. He having tried in vain to induce Agnes to listen to the suit of the young man, s;iid she should be a Vestal virgin, and had her dragged to the altar of Vesta, where instead of throwing on incense she made the sign of the Cross. Then she was exposed to public infamy, which, however, she escaped, only to be first put on a fire, and then beheaded. Such are tlie main points in her story as comnuiidy accepted in very early times. St. Ambrose says that she preferred chastity to life ; St, Jerome that she overcame both the cruelty of the tyr.ant and the tenderness of her age, and crowned the glory of chastity with tliat of martyrdom ; St. Augustine that her name nie.ans chaste in (Ireik and Iamb in Latin. As in the case of St. Prisca and of many others, it is imjiossible to know how much of truth underlies the mass of legend that has grown around her story. It is said that while lier parents were praying at her tomb, probably in the Catacombs, she a]ipearcd to them with a choir of holy virgins to comfort them, hence her "second feast" referred to .above. A church in Rome, built over her sup- posed resting-place, has acquired a kind of distinction from the Pope's going there each year on St. Agnes' Day to bless the lambs whose fleeces are to be m.ade into the palls sent to Archbishojis, one of which appears in the arms of the .See of Canterbury lying upon the arehi.c|iiacopal cross. St, Agnes is mentioned in the A'ohi.'! (jiiO(/>ir in the Canon of the Mass. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. li. 1-8, St. Matt, xiii. 44-.')2.] Co/eH'/(()'S— All. Cf)C a9mor IDolpDays of January. Dedications of CImrches — Three (one with St. Anne). RepreneMcd — With a lamb or an angel by her ; with a lamb on a book ; in a lire ; angela covi-ring her with tlieir hair, or a garment ; a sword in her hand or m her tliroat ; a dagger ; a palm ; a short cross ; a dove bringing a ring to her as a "bride of Christ." 22] Vincent, Spanisu Deacon and Maiityi!. — St. Vincent was Ijorn at Saragossa, trained in the faitli liy Valerius, Bishop of tliat see, and by him, too, ordained deacon. The Bishop, having an imi)ediinent in his speech, gave himself to prayer and meditation, while Vincent under liis direction undertook public teaching. Uatian, governor under Diocletian and Maximian, was a fierce persecutor, and only too zealous in carrying out the imperial edict for the "Diocletian persecu- tion." Valerius and Vincent being l>rought before Datian in chains, he first tried tlie usual May of persuasion in order to induce them to sacrifice to the gods. They both stood firm ; and Valerius being unable to deliver a public address, Vincent made a noble profession of the faith in the name of both. Valerius was banished, but Vincent was put to the most horrible tortures. He was stretched on a rack, torn with hooks, bc.iten. put on ,in iron frame with sharp bars and a fire under, and laid on broken pots in a dungeon, while his feet were made fast in the stocks. Here he sang praises to God, and his jailer was converted. Datian chafed with rage, but now ordered him to be put to bed, either to recruit his strength for more tortures or to prevent his dying a martyr. But God took him. He departed in peace January 22, a.d. 304. The rage of the persecutor followed his dead body, which though thrown into the sea was at last obtained and privately buried by the Christians. When the persecutions were over, it was removed and laid with great honour under the altar of the principal eluirch in Valencia. The "Acts" of ,St. Vincent are at least older tlian the time of St. Augustine, when they were read in the church of Hippo. His "passion" fonns the subject of a hymn by Prudentius, and of sermons, etc., liy St. Augustine, St. Leo, and other early fathers. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xiv. 20, and xv. 4-6. St. John .\ii. 24-26.] C'ale7idars — All. DediaUions of C/ntrches — Four. Hcprcscnlcd — As a deacon holding an iron hook, or a boat, or a palm ; his bowels toni by a hook ; burnt on a gridiron ; angels breaking his chains ; a wolf ; a erow or raven, some- times on a millstone. 2.')] Conversion of St. Paul. — [.SVr notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dcdirnfionn ofCInirrhcs — Seventy-two to St. Paul alone; \\M\ St. Peter, two hundred and thirty ; with the Blessed Virgin, (me. Reprenentrd — St. Paul is represented with a sword and book, or with the three springs supposed to have gushed out at three places where his head fell upon the earth after decapi- tation. .SO] Kino Ch.4rles's Martyrdom. — See "State Services ' in Appendix. Dedicatiom of Churches — Six. 134 Cfjc Calcnoar toitl) tijc Cable of lessons. d ._. •^ ii. Id >• i ^2. 1— 1 X X 5 :s .£ >■> '>'> .2 x'x 'x'x 1 • > ^ -p 'H— : :;^ .^ X S c 5 X :3 ._. § (d o 3 :a > 'p. 2 "x ;5-x-R XXX "x .^ 'x _ . i.£'s''p:'s > x'x XXX X s > :2 .- >' CD i-l n X X X X X XXX ^x 1^ X X X X XXX Xf^.;: -^ '? X 'x'x q .p^ oJoJ :a « o •'-' mco >■ < < p; o « :a :3 > >">^ '> 1.2 X 'x'x XXX X 5 .S: >'S' ■5I .2 X 43- 'x-J K 1 .:a :=.>x •5 X 'x §:5'> x'x .>'S'S X -e 1 ^ o El; ■> "? x" XXX >■ X « X M X S-- ■?.d X X X X X XXX tJ X ji X X X X XXX Xq.„ > 'x'x ^:S ■0:3 IN a CI [.: 1-^ CO Pi .• X 1^ ^x" ri X s -0- Vi CO 1-^ y> OS m ?- • _. r^t^ CO >—* 43 .. . " ,- cc ^^ S jj ,_^ ^ ^cc (M j_- 43 c- .r4 l~c C«- I—I .•03 >^ ^. .« -fJ "^ ^" .. :d '> 'p :s:3:S S o > > > S 43 z -M ;- . 43 ;- -*3 X X 'x 'x XXX X X X X X c . .2 .2' i ^ X X X X f-; X XXX X X xxx^:a > v> ?» > x'x ^• 0" < -rl CO >C5 :s d g^ i-I ^ X .^3 7i X 03 2 § s 'x ^x- —i ^* -*J 1 — CO Lt" sj i " --o ^ . fi — ' ;- cc •?.2 ^H '> '> .2 X 'x'x X X X X X XXX XXX X X X X — :=c' X n X - t-^ :3 ■J & ^ ?5 . X 10 ~ X s. 'x 'x *x :a > 'x'x §1.-^C0 X X X X X XXX X X b ,* 43 */ .^ CO CO ^ c» ^■ •^4i 3b 5 > X *X*P X X X XXX X X X X X X X XXX X XJ2 — '•- •-■- 2 43 c; ^* ^ c«5 •.3 1- -■ ■^ ^' oi s d CO 01 pq s § ??1; .^I^ ?^^ 'x ^ > c^-2^ CI « d H -^ s o J' X 'c ^ -: L. (M ■*-' ..CO Ij X CO . c '^ 43 " (M 2!- ..• « s ^ 5J p ^ K s fc' ci <5 \ J X ^~ :s ^ ~ s -~ ^•!l . s ~3.3 X X .. .> X *^ '> '^ ^ ..J +3 .S t^'S.^'x :3 >■> 'x'x 'x ^ *x 'x ■" >.2 3 Si rf X XXX XXX X X— • 0} C5 '>< ^ > X X X X X X X XXX XXX X X X .X ^• _jj • >i ^ +3 »-• -^ rt s O) 1 1 i c3 KJ i 1 > 1 g- B '0 •s J* i .1 ■5 a i 1 » S «« J 1 a d 1^ k5 ^ •rt'-S 1= 'Aai .■a rf ea rt rt ti eS ti e3 c5 cj rt 15 rt t— 1 •cat! 3" a . . . . ocijo OOO 00 00 ccA eoPM '^i to Ift Tfi CO oi-^o ci CO t^ iD la ■^co ^i -* t'^ 50 10-* t—i .-1 1— 1 1— 1 1— 1 h t3 v-i 60 M Mi> Co s o o > w M •p s • <-i t-s .s =« T! m -C a «2 ri ._;S«.S S§ Blase. Andrew Agatha. Dorothy Romualc John of ApoUoni Scholast .9 § C3 rf >fe 4^434^+34343+^43 43'!/J M 02 CO M 02 02 M m 02 02 c2 a a; . — I O rd -P CH O > •IH I I O O s o ^ a ° 43 a 43 02 - m to +3 5^ 0) r;i n^':: o FH^iw-^irscot^oooso F-HC-icc-T+JiooD 43 3 +; 43 43 1/3 cc P^ CO ■:© M cc 3 ID ca •c Cm C8 o CQ u o S bo-s.2 tH . « rH 03 43 <3 MB CO S eS O o >■ m O o !3 <1 136 Ct)C 99inor JDolgnaps of jFcbruarp. 2] PUKIFICATIOX OF MaKY THE BLESSED ViEGlX. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll. ] Represented — At her purification, with a pair of turtle-doves. .See March 25th. 3] 13l.\sh:s, Bishop and Martyr. — St. Blaise was Bishop of Sebaste in Armenia, and suffered martyrdom in the persecu- tion of Liciuius [a.d. 316], but we know scarcely anything about his life or death, his "Acts" being of late date and small authority. Some say he suffered in the Diocletian per- secution. The Roman iMartyrology states that he was scourged, hanged on a post or tree, and torn with iron combs, then cast into a most foul prison, then into a lake, and finally beheaded in company with two boys and seven women. One of the alleged instruments of his martyrdom has led to his being esteemed as the patron of wool-combers, and as such he is still remembered at Norwich, at Bradford in Yorkshire, and other places where hand-combing is or has been practised. The Council of Oxford [a.d. 1222] prohibited servile work on this day. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Heb. v. 1-6. St. Matt. .\. 26-32.] Calendars — All. Dedieation.'s of Clmrclies — Three, and one with St. Mary. Represented— As a Bishop, with crosier and book, with wool-comb, or torch or taper ; a pig's head near him, allud- ing to a legend of his restoring a dead pig ; birds bringing him food. 5] Agatha, Sicilian Virgin and Martyr. — The story of St. Agatha or Agace is very like that of St. Agnes [January 21st]. She was a native of either Palermo or Catania, of a noble family, and consecrated to God from her earliest years. In the Decian persecution [a.d. 251], Quintianus the consul availed himself of the imperial edict to seize both her person and her estate. Being in the hands of her persecutors, she prayed, saying, "0 Jesu Christ, Lord of all. Thou seest my heart, Thou knowest all my desire, do Thou alone possess all that I am. I am Thy sheep, make me worthy to overcome the Evil One." After the most infamous assaults on her chastity, and the usual horrible tortures, she sweetly slept in Jesus. Her name occurs in the Nobis qiioque. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.; Ecclus. li. 1-S. St. Matt. xiii. -14-52.] C'ale7idars— AW. Dfdkations of Churches — Three. Represented — Holding a breast cut off, in pincers ; a knife at her breast ; breasts in a dish, or on a book ; an e3e in pincers ; a knife, or pincers, or hook in her hand ; on a funeral pile, or with a chating-dish of burning coals near her. 14] St. Valentine, Bishop and Martyr. — We find a St. Vali'iitine on this day in the Sarum, and hence in the Aberdeen and Reformed English Calendars, styled bishop and martyr ; iu those of York, Hereford, and the Austin Canons, martyr only ; in the Roman and Monastic, presbyter and martyr. The Roman Martyrology mentions two Valentines on February 14th — a presbyter of Rome and a bishop of Teramo, both martyrs. The former assisted other martyrs, and was condemned by Claudius II. to be beaten with clubs and beheaded about a.d. 270. His name is celebrated in the Sacramentary of St. Gregory, and he is doubtless the person meant in all the calendars, " Bishop " in Sarum, etc., being a clerical error. The name was so common in the later days of tlie empire that there were at least eight martyrs of the same name, as well as three found in the Catacombs with the palm branch and bottle of blood. The sending of "Valentines" is supposed to be a survival of a heathen custom observed on or about this day. [Sar. Ejj. and Gosp.: Ecclus. xxxi. 8-11. St. Matt. xvi. 24-2S.] Cale7idars — All. Dedieations of Churches — None. Represented — As a priest with a sword. 24] St. Matthias, Apostle and Martye. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — One only until modern times, Thorpe by Hadiscoe, Norfolk. Represerdcd, — With halbert, sword, or axe ; witli a stone in his hand. 138 Cf)c CalcnDar tuitfj tf)C Cable of JLessong. tH CO w o (D CO P < H Ph"" •^S=- .a ffi' X X X X X J= x'S. X S 1-5 .2 X t: XX(^. = XX ■>.2 X X > > ;* X X ^ X X ^ . .-J .5 >> •>->.d X .^ XXX X XXX X X 1-5 •"•" X . .-4 :3 'S'?'? X 'x'x -: ,^ > ab := .„• >■ XXX X X X m > . X 13 .-.- > XXX X X x.o > > X X P.S > >■ X X X X 1-^ 1-5 X X X X X ■5 > X-S-; aj:s n •4 00 C ■s tf ^ CI ^ S c =." - C3 " '^ i ><■-•-■ .-4 C<5 X X X X X X X X x'-'., 5-- . . >« 5i S> S. -H X s. o o vit. xvi m. 6.i'i .^ > '> 4^ ,^ > y. y. X X X s <0 X i- X y, X. X X XXX X X 1» ^j !z; w i~- o. 5 iSS ;:d .._;"? 'x • > X X X X ^eJ ^ X X. .2 X X : X X X 1 X X X ! C3 — t c^ . ^ ^- s; o ^. 3 rf e*5 if^ ?i3 'x'x'x' 3 ■* o . . o • >^ ! X 3. i-:i CO CO ; ;::»■»• S » i? y > . t^tc 32 . 0) -^^t'- ^ .-.s > X X X X -t ^ CI X X X X X 3 X X X X X a; CO --^ c o = . -*^ : i.« t-"i ■XXI ■P ■§ m o ■a & lU O CL, Bj P5 a O a — . H M £ c SI 8 . . •d a a a o o « . . Q CO ic . . a a o . ° o fe5 8 S?!<5 .a . to 1.C -f M e-i 33 t^ <:d »rj -fl M ci — < o oi GO i-^ » r: p t^ 3 £ H 2 § to a .« & o o fc S &«=; Q >» o c3 ^v, r Ss c o o .1= 1- ■!^ Cl 'r: n ii,n i s ':3 ^ < 3 s ^ ^' ,0 tD Ft fc ^ 0) 5 ;?; .=> -d q ^ o ® « *o x" U u > a; S c « £ 5g K cj 9 Us 152 Comparison of CalcnOars. 139 ^ "S •" r^ . J 1 . t. . _|.2 . 1 ^ a^ » W ■3 Pnt^ . '■i^ Theo Fo: ebast Quai ompa (L> --2 f- ." (H a 1 *! si *> ■|J OD K'H IB M tc H •0 a a ^ i g ■4^ a & "§> .a ^ P-t l> s •0 3 m tf es -J^ OQ .3 (0 ^ 60 a s M ^ S. Thomas A Felicitas. t. FeUx. t. Frances. he Forty Mart t. John of God t. Gregory the 1 § a t. David. t. Chad. t. Casimir. t. Patrick, t. Gabriel, t. Joseph, t. Cuthber t. Benedic XIX K M XX H !XX XX -XX X ■ c3 fe Ti •tf ri d Q § ■s c3 < e Pieranus. Perpetua as. Gregory. t- a •43 > c3 ^r3 .a ^ -*j a 2 '3 ,d -p m rt .a a *i aj ■" jj -tJ -t! d 32 CC CO i» 02 XX ► > ffl f> "S •P-( d 4^ < -*^ -*.i n b 1^ c« ^ rt S" Is ■3 ft ^a 0(S a 3 a *!« 4J -ti -u' a 02 02 M XX < , '0 t^ S ^ >J ;^' >■ •-' •a S cq Q a (4-1 < C8 (U n 1 Perpetua as. Gregory. Patrick. Edward t Cuthbert. Benedict. § a a a a ■•f ■*^ ai*' *i 43 43 4J 4J COM X X 02aj MM <^ £ S 1" > CO 1 «4-l Q* p^ < a 1 i .2 '-3 w 1 1 3 CI MM 1 a a a -Elfthrytli [Elfrida], whose son Ethelred was then elected king at the age of ten. The English Chronicles under the year 978 lament the crime without naming the criminal. "Here was Eadweard king slain at eventide at Corfes-gate, on xv. kal. Apr., and men buried him at Wierham without any kingly worship. Never was done worse deed among Englishmen than this since first they sought Britain. Men murdered him, but (!od honoured him. He was in life an earthly king, he is now after death a heavenly saint," etc. Florence of Worcester charges Elfrida with the crime, and the story gathers fresli details in the hands of each succeeding chronicler. Among other things we are told that Elfrida beat the child Ethelred with wax candles because he wept for his lirothcr, wherefore he hated tlic sight of wax candles for the rest of his life. The popular legend of Edward's being st.abbed in the back is not found in tlie earliest accounts. The Sarum Breviary dwells much on his goodness, and he was popularly considered to have died a martyr. It may be noted that he is so called in Cbc a^inor n^olpDaps of a^arcb 141 the Saruni, but not in the Reformed Calendar. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecelus. xxxi. 811. St. Luke xiv. 26-33.] Calendars — Sarum only. Dedications 0/ C/nirdies— Twenty -one, either to him or to St. Edward the Confessor ; that at Corfe Castle certainly to the "Martyr." lfepj-ese»ted—Aa a king, with dagger, falcon, or cup. 21] Benedict, Ap.iior. — St. Benedict, who restored monastic discipline in the West, and founded the great Benedictine Order, was born of a good family at Norcia, in Umbi'ia, about A. u. 480. He was educated in the great jmblic schools in Rome, but was so slioclced at tlie licentiousness of his fellow- students that he secretly betook himself to a cavern at Subiaco at the age of fifteen, and lived tliere as a hermit for three years, being supplied with food by Romanus, a monk. When distracted by temptations he used to roll liimself in the briers, to which Bishop Taylor refers in his IIol;/ Living. Some of the shepherds of the wild district round about were induced by him to become monks, and he was himself persuaded to become Abbot of Vicobarro, near .Subiaco, where, as a reformer of abuses, he became so unpopular with some of the inmates that they tried to poison him. After praying to God to forgive them, he returned to liis cave, where he liad many disciples. He organized twelve religious houses, each with a superior and twelve monks, a number having reference to Christ and His twelve disciples. These were united in the Monastery of St. Scholastica, supposed to be the most ancient of the order. Benedict, h.av- iug still many enemies, and being a man of peace, retired to Mount Cassino, where idolatrous rites still prevailed, and where stood an old temple of Apollo and a grove. He over- threw the temple and cut down the grove, foundeil two oratories on the site, and bi-ought many to the faith of Christ. This was the beginning of the famous Monastery of Monte Cassino, where the present monastic system was organized, and wlienoe proceeded the Benedictine Rule. Towards the close of Benedict's life his sister Scholastica came to reside near him, with a small community of religious women, and he used to vi.sit her once a year. Ife died of a fever caught iu visiting the poor. Feeling tliat his end was drawing near, he oidercd his grave to bo dug, and, sujiported by the brethren, contemplated it in silence for some time. Being then carried into the ch,apel, he there ex])ired on the eve of Passion Sunday, March 21, a.d. 543. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecelus. xxxix. 5-9. St. Luke xi. 33-.'!G.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — Sixteen, unless any be dedicated to St. Benedict Biscop. Represented — As a Benedictine monk ; with devils ; roll- ing in thorns ; thorns near him ; in a cave, food let down to him by a monk ; a cup on a book ; a cup breaking and spilling liquor ; a cup with serpents on a book ; a raven at his feet, or with a loaf in its bill ; a stick in his hand, the raven on it ; a sprinkler ; a pitcher ; a ball fif fire ; a book with the beginning of his Rule, Avscvlta Fii.i Veub.\ Magistri. 2.5] Annunciation of Bi-essku Virgin MAEy.—[,S'(!e notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — About two tliousand one hundred and twenty, and one hundred and two with other saints. Bepresented — At her annunciation, jiraying or reading, the angel appearing to her with A ve Maria, etc. , on a scroll, and between or near them a lily in a pot, generally with three flowers, to remind us that before, in. and after her motherhood she remained a pure virgin. This is her chief emblem. Often she is represented as a queen, with the Infant Christ in her arms ; sometimes as "Our Lady of Pity," a sorrowing mother, with the dead Christ on her knees : sometimes as the " Mater Dolorosa," weeping, and witli a sword passing through her heart [St. Luke ii. 35]. She is generally represented willi a blue outer robe over a red under garment. The conventional lleur-de-lys is sacred to her. 142 Cf)C CalcnDar toitb tf)C Cable of Lessons. , n § c :S "^ IH S a > )^ 1 |.s->v-P '> .- >i 'x 'x . > j; Oh .-: := i-s .«:2 ,^ > CC i w '-3 ^ IM"""-H . •" «} « 1 i'= • >" ••3' .-• > '?'> X 1 ;3 >'5.'d'?; :3 ° «D w J =3 :s . :3 .« '> '> k' 'x'x X X X rg .-• . :3 J —• X K X .3 > > -2 X x;3 CD CC >. K « >« XXX X X X X X X X x-< >■ '> l-H 3 *■• ^H e-i 1 i _. ._• :a > >■ ■5 .J '> < C4 ^ « M *^ . ;5.^ > iS J .._::3:5.i: >'? ^.^xxxxxxx '> '> .- X 'x 'x 'x'x X X X a 5 ^««^:= t- > X X X X X X X X X X X ^ >■ :3 &>: 5 O 5 >■•>.•;■ 'x'x X X X X ,5 >• •- :3 . xxxx^-^.^-^f-x :s.£''-:l X 'x 'x c- i2 t>' S XXX X X X M X X X X X '> ^ ^-c ■ in ^ ■> ?1 c 1 n S ^•^ ■=^-2 . 4J CO 5 M ■x"S ii. iii. iv. to iv. »■. vi. Iph. i. 11. iii. iv. to iv. V. '. V. r. 2 vi. t\ hil, i. ii. :5.5 '0 c> H Pi fi lO ^ s s ■<«i ■0 »■ H > ^ » s ti E£) s 1 ^ ^ .5 »• 5 e5 CO X X m i "" i .12 1 >■> -A y. X S i> '> x' xi. i'. xiv. xvi. Ruth i iv. 1 Sam. iii. v. vii. ."^ X X X X X X X X 'x X J; 'x X b 1-5 1-5 o3 O CO d o -§ .^■.• (M CO ^ ?;' t-^ . >' — >o .;;;, X — o5 J? 2 .S^^ -S ?)."..•.- 00 . « . V. Jl. ii. to r. 20. ii. V. 20. iii. to r. 31. iii. r. 31 to xix r.. 1 1 — CC ■^•u-5 X J.- >• 1 J< Sj 'x . .^ .M "3 rs >• r* >>>;>>> s > >■ > >. x'x 'x'x 'x 'x'x 'x'x X X X X X y. 'x'x X X X <1 1-9 g 1 1^ o ■♦a CO i ■ :3t^ *> ^ • X E •-* -t"^ ^ •^ ==i — g . -*3 £ .^ §.&■•? .2'^ •x.g' . . :s 'x'x X 3:3^:3 .>•> 13 .:=.&■ t; '>'> X 'K 'x X 3 > > *? >■ X X X X X X X X X ■-5 t-J EJ :3 ^ 11 J3^ 1 1 § D. o< « •" s S* i> # cvJ ■S ■e g oM ts .0 en •g s g) «| < c -g ^ . p. ss 5 S ^ '3 ai . . d r^ Calendi 4. Non, 3. Non, Pr. No Nona;. .T3 15 'rt 'rt "rt 15 'rt "rt *« *« 'rt 'rt 'rt "rt"!? ^ "rt 'rt hH HH H-H 1— ( 1— ( ^■-1 »oooooo C-' ^ C-) o-j U .>'^Q6t^<»»0'*CC (N ^ a: 06 l-^ CD in ■^ CO t^ oor^eD 10 ■* e.5Ci S-^ 'rt d fe« 1— ( > 43' ■M ^fl^u'2^ g's" OT t g 11 ■4J 11 ■3 ™ 0) CO tn S3£ a ^ cj 2 ™ "^ ►i WH ,2 fc- rt ^ O > rt ei « ■* >o w c: o M ci CO -1^ l> ■pH -P U 'A a o O a , a a q ■43 M p^ H 13 a r/) OJ CO M-4 O £?-|^ O c3 J2 OSS TO rt tn 7; ^ ■43 X u cS % S H •a a r/j C/J o H is m o S 144 Cbe 00inor IjDolpDaps of 3pril. 3] RiCHAKD, Bishop of Chichester. — Eichard de la Wyoh, of the icyche or salt spring, is said to have l)een born at Droit- wich, where his parents had an estate to which he was heir. Early in his life, and intbeformer half of the thirteenth century, he joined the new Order of the Dominicans, wliich was then attracting the most ardent and energetic minds in Western Europe. Having been educated at Oxford, Paris, and Bologna, he became public reader in Canon Law at the last place, and on his return Chancellor first of Edmund, Arch- bishop of Canterlniry [St. Edmund], and then of the Uni- versity of Oxford. The see of Chichester falling vacant, the canons, in order to curry favour Mitli Henry III. , as was said, elected a chaplain of his, K(jbert Passelewe. But the Pope set aside this election ostensibly on account of Passelewe's want of learning, and himself consecrated Richard to the see during the Council of Lyons in 1245. Henry seized the leveuues, and for two years the Bishop had to depend on other sources of maintenance ; but at last the King restored them, having been threatened with excommunication by the Pope When" Richard was established in his see he amply justified the papal choice, affording in his life and conversation a pattern of episcopal virtues. In preaching, the strong point of the Dominican Order, and in visiting, he was indefatigable. He died April 3, 1253, at Dover, where he had rested while preaching the Crusade along the coast. His canonization was procured by the Dominicans in 1261, and in 1276 his relics were translated from their first resting-place in Chichester Cathedral to the shrine in which they remained until tlie Reformation. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Ecclus. xliv. 17, 20-23, and xlv. 6, 7, 15, 16. St. John xv. 1-7.] Cale7>t!ars — Sarum, Hereford. VaUcations of Churches—One only, Aberford, in Yorkshire. Represented— With, a chalice at his feet, or kneeling with chalice before him, alluding to a legend that he fell with the chalice without spilling its contents. 4] St. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan. — He was born about a.d. 340, in Gaul, where his father held the office of Pra'torian Prefect. It is saiil that while he was a child a swarm of bees flew about his cradle, some settling on his mouth, which, as in the case of Plato, was thought to be a sign of future eloquence. He was educated at Rome, where he excelled in Greek and Civil Law, and was appointed Governor of Liguria. He also practised as an advocate ; and displayed so much wisdom and judgement in this capacity during a contest between the orthodox and the Arians, relative to an appoint- ment to tlie see of Milan, that although not yet baptized, he was strongly pressed and urged by general acclamation to take the office himself. He reluctantly consented, and, after baptism, was ordained and consecrated, December 7, A.I). 374. Having now embraced Christianity with his whole heart, and made over to the Church of Milan all his estates, he thoroughly devoted hiiriself to his new duties. He had constant difficulties from the prevalence of the Arian and Apollinarian heresies, and wrote many theological treatises, both controversial and devotional. He is spoken of by St. Augustine in his Confessions with the most afiectionate reverence, as having been greatly instrumental in his con- version. For the tradition about the Te Deum, see under Aug. 28. The saying, "When lam at Rome, I do as they do at Rome," is attributed to St. Ambrose, who thus replied to St. Augustine about the diU'erent modes of observing Saturday at Rome and Milan, it being then customary to fast on Saturday at the former lint not at the latter place. On all matters of principle, however, he was immoveable. ^Vhen the Arian Empress Justina sent to ask him for the use of a church out- side the city for herself and the Arians [A.n. 385], Ambrose replied that he conld never give up the temple of fiod. After some days' struggle he carried his point, and the following year the same contention was renewed, with the same result. It is well known too how he excommunicated the Emperor Theodosius for a cruel abuse of power, and shut the C'hurch of Milan against him, exhorting him with such effect tliat ho became a true penitent. Like St. Gregory, he composed some beautiful hymns, and, like him also, paid great attention to church music and to the construction of the Liturgy and Offices. Hence the "Ambrosian rite," not yet wholly abolished at Milan, has a very distinct character of its own. lie is reckoned as one of the four doctors of the Western (-'hurch. A few days before his last sickness he dictated an exposition of the 43rd [our 41th] Psalm, which he had to leave untinished, as it has come down to us, nnthing being said on the last two verses. After a long illness he died about midnight before Easter Eve, April 4, A.\>. 397, aged about (ifty-seveu years, and his body still rests at Milan un.ler the high altar of the church dedicated to him. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Ecclus. xlvii. 8-11. St. Matt. xxiv. 42-47.] Calendars — All. In the Roman and Monastic Calendars, however, as in the Eastern Church, his feast is on December 7th, the day of liis ordination. Dedknllons of Churches — One, Ombersley, in Worcestershire. Sepresented — ^Vith scourge, or beehive ; repelling the Emperor. 19] Alphege, Ap.chbishop of Canteeeury. — .^Ifheah, or Alphege, was a West Saxon of noble birth, who early in life left his paternal estate and his widowed mother to become a monk. Like many persons of high lineage, he was soon placed at the head of a monastery, and it is supposed that he was Abbot of Bath. By special favour of Dunstan he was made Bishop of Winchester a.d. 984, being only just thirty years old ; and after presiding over that see for twenty-two years, he was translated to Canterbury. Soon after this he was taken captive by the Danes, and at first promised them a ransom, being kept in their ships in the Thames, near Greenwich, until it should be i)aid. On the Saturday after Easter, April 19, A. 11. 1012, the Danes were holding drunken festival, and called on Alphege for the ransom ; but he refused to have anything given for his life, and told them as he had sinned in promising, they might deal with him as they would. So they dragged him to their busting or assembly. Earl Tliurkill, a Christian Dane, offered gold and silver, all that he had, save only his ship, to save the good man's life. But they pelted the Archbishop with stones, logs of ■\\'ood, and the bones left from their feast, until one Thrini, a recent convert, clave his head with his axe out of sheer pity. And, says the chronicle, "his holy blood on the earth fell, his holy soul he to God's kingdom sent." The body, probably through Thur- kill's influence, was allowed to be taken to London with all honour ; it was Ijuried in St. Paul's Jlinster, and afterwards translated to Canterliury by King Canute. Lanfrauc disputed the claim made for Alphege to the title of martyr, but Auselm defended it on the ground that he died for Christian justice and charity, refusing to sanction the plundering of his jjeople to save his' own life. In the Sarum Calendar he is called martyr, but not in ours, as in the case of St. Edward, March ISth. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Heb. xiii. 9-16. St. John xv. 1-T] Calendars — Sarum, Aberdeen. Dedications of Churches — Five, one being the parish church of Greenwich, on the supposed site of the murder ; another is in London. Bi'presentcd — With stones in his chasuble ; a battle-axe in his band. 23] St. Geoeoe, Martyr. — His name is in the Saerameutary of St. Gregory, with Collects for his daj-. But his "Acts" are certainly apocryphal, as is the story of "St. George and the Dragon," contained in the Golden Legend, accepted by the uncritical clerks of the middle ages, and inserted in Breviaries, from which it was removed by Clement VII., 1523-34, when St. George was simply acknowledged as a martyr, reigning with Christ. Indeed, a MS. Roman Breviary of much earlier date contains a single lection, apparently from a martyrology, in which it is said that if his " Acts " be apoc- ryphal, yet "he was an illustrious martyr. It is impossible here even to refer to the various versions of his storj% which may be seen in Baring-Gould's Life. Suffice it to say that the St. George who was recognized by St. Gregory was probably a martyr mentioned by Eusebius, without giving his name, as having piillcd down and torn into shreds a decree of Diocletian against the Cburcli in Kicomedia ; and that he is by no means to be identified, as he is by Gibbon and Dean Stanley, with tlio Arian prelate George of Cappadocia, who died some forty- two years after a church had been dedicated to " St. George the Martyr," by Constantino the Great, in Constantinople. The Sarum Breviary of 1556 says he ^^•a3 of Cappadocia (as was generally supposed), and that ho was martyred under Datian, but does" not mentinn the Dragon story, on which St. (ieorge's great popularity in the middle ages mainly depended, though it doubtless arose out of some allegorical or syndjolical i-epre- sentation. He was also honoured as having appeared against the Saracens at tlie head of a numerous army, carrying a red cross banner, whence he was regarded as the champion of Cliristendom, Our Lady's Knight, and the J'atron of England. He is sometimes called "St. George of Lydda," from the place of his liurial, according to some accounts. The Greek Church hononr.s him with the titles of "Great Martyr" and "Trophy-bearer." [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: St. James i. 2-12. St. John XV. 1-7.] Calendars — All. Cfje S0inor J^olgDags of 9pril. 145 Dedications of ChurcJies— One hundred and sixty-two, and four with other saints. Represented— As an armed knight, standing or on horseback fighting a dragon with a spear ; a cross on liia armour and shield. 25] St. Maek, Evangelist and Martyr. — [See notes en Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedication!! nf Churches — Thirteen. Repre/iPvted—\K Evangelist, with a winged lion ; as a JIartyr, strangled with cords. K 146 C&e CalcnDar toitb tbe Cable of lessons. CO CO (£> P c • •H a V ■^ c .-• « >' -iA ■ ■ .._: ..-• j; tJ :s > •>.2 x";s":S.S >"'?■>■? .2 a 3 rt - > X J-: X >^ X X « X M X X H. 1-1 ^^ § c &«■ ;^ K « bUj to .^ :^ •" OJ > 5 'p > « x 'x i5 "^ CI'" •-■ '? >< '^ 'P. « '?.2 P, 'S S H M K M X Ezra V. vii. Neh. iv. vi. ix. xiii Esth tj 00 ce Q 1-4 CO CO n "^^■-■■^ > .5 >■■>'>■>. 2 X X X X X X .s > > > > X X X X X .s-> ^SW K' X a) 'H t~ 06 t,-* 00 ^ ^ =: ^ > S'^ 5;-s n _••- ' 3 OS 1^ 01 s 00 m ■- CO .s »■ 05 01 S "<: '0 :7i .^H .-• ^ > >■ H:s 'l'^ H.^ :id t > >• P :a :3 .E; +3 ^ ■ H .-^:S > > p- PM u ^ (M ■-^ X iC Si t, in CO ?j IJ h^^ r-^ -* a % 3 ^ 5 0^ .43 . > to to ji to CO ^* co i-H X ^. ^.> S-; !> > > X X w > > > X ►> x>^* .>•>■? X 7j > M X X X X X X ;_; > ^ ;> X h; X X X X X '-' CM ^ Cl « « S -p S3 3- & ^o s: X . X o e-i o o £, 'x ^- i: -^ ;J ^ » X . ,.^.r^.^ j£ *x "x 'x "x x "x 3 X X X X X X Cl « S-C-l ~ >>>>> S£- o£,.. cc'O ?> CO o I^ P-J El- C) X ■A o^ > > X X X .S > >.2 X X X X X X IN ^ Rl ;5 a o •43 a > a H 3 o O ^ a R •^ != m 3 CJ -i^ < > a a a a § . '^^Jq'^ a in ' < « Ph^ 06 t-^O) lOTjJri&H „-(3w^^oo 00000 0000 O '5 1- 'JJ iri -*' cc ci ^ o oj 00 t-i tc in ■* CO > J3 O ^ CI '^ 0) »4-4 bo «** bDH CO 4^ tOd d V aw TO !_ ^ ^H §1-2 3 (/3 a, <1 a s ^ S ° io d m ^ d t?'d kJ o o >> tJO-e . m f) r to s O .aCM . o 4iX' •- cc'oo cc 0^ o >^ s o rt .^ d~ g OfS CCOQ MM O 3 Pip 6-g -a W .i-i •3 g" a 1^ S ^ • 1 P. - • 1—' 3 cc *> *> *■ Ph 02 tC d o 4^ d ° S 2 d Cm > d'lS 03 O d d .a ,3 o o 1-5 1-5 43 4J p< u a w 3 ^ ri M < is MH % i 1 a 3 J2 S 43 1 a W tn t J Ph ■T3 f/> QJ !!•' CO (A ^ 3 4^ *-< o« CQ > -P O O Q d 3 C8 o rt OJ OJ 1-, jais -« d >" X P. a<3.3 jd ■■§ g ^ iTr:^ M d p3 Ph > d c«-. c3 O a, o 5; S u _« »Ph .1 CO 3 n 3 -J -fi d 1 W3 CO cc 9 3 2 ^ P^ 11 J-^ *Sr3 ^ d Ph > CO a on of Alexa tius. .2P5 d .il vent SS. Eve 1-5 ^^ §0 4J 4J rri-/i eH::C ^ f) «< fr> ^ a;- d OS Oi 1h ^ -rt d 111 CAi -y.i s 3 Q CO CO S 43 ja 11 <5,a 3 a cS o (-1 Ah O-g '*-' a d o a o x'a t: a oj 13 s =3 S.S ■■S*^ S.2 a 4^ i-i 02 P^ hH (Sm § PhPh 148 C!)e s©inor I^oIj)Daps of a^ap. 1] SS. Philip and Jaimes, Apostles and ItlAETTKS. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications 0/ Churches — Four ancient ones with tlie joint dedication ; one to St. Philip and All Saints ; about three hundred and fifty to one or other St. James, most of these, how- ever, are probablj' to St. James the Greater ; not one is known to be to St. James the Less alone. Represented — St. Philip, holding a basket with or without bread visible ; two or three loaves ; a tall cross. .SY. James the Less, with a fuller's club. 3] Invention" of the Cross. — This day, sometimes called St. Helen's or EUinmas Day, commemorates tlie supposed finding of tlie Cross on which our Lord suft'ered by the Empress Helena, about a.d. 326. But the date and details are involved in great obscurity. St. Cj'ril of Jerusalem speaks of the true wood being seen in his time [circa 350]. In 351 be speaks of its having been found in Jerusalem in the time of Constantino the Great. St. Ambrose [a.d. 395] relates its discovery by Helena, the mother of Constantine, while digging on Golgotha, and says that it was known from the thieves' crosses by the title. St. Chrysostom about the same time gives similar testimony, but does not mention Helena. Paifinus, however, also about the same time, says that Helena had to dig among the ruins of a temple of A'enus, and that the title being separate, the true cross was identified by the miraculous healing of a sick person who was laid on it. As we get later the story runs into more and more minuteness of detail, and at last developes into a romance. Euseliius mentions Helena's journey into Palestine, but says not a word about the cross. According, however, to the generally received account, the Empress lodged the main part of the cross in the church which she and her son built in Jerusalem, sending otlier portions to Constantinople and Rome. To Rome also she sent the title, where part of it is still preserred. About twenty-five nails are shewn in diii'erent places. The Eastern commemoration is that of "the appearance of the Sign of the Cross" [the Labarum] to Constantine. [Sar. Ep. aud Gosp.: Gal. V. 10-12, and vi. 12-14. St. John iii. 1-15.] [.S'.e Sep- tember 14th.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — Possibly one, Balling, in Norfolk. 6] St. John Evangelist ante Port. Lat. — This festival commemorates the miraculous deliverance of St. John when, having been apprehended at Ephesus, he was carried to Piome and placed in a caldron of boiling oil before the Latin Gate after previous scourging. His remaining safe and sound was attributed to magic. TertuUian is the first to mention this miracle, and it rests mainly on his authority. St. John was afterwards banished to Patmos, where lie had the visions recorded in the Apocalypse. The legend of the poisoned cup, of which he is said to have drunk unhurt, rests on no good authority, and lias probably arisen out of representations of the Apostle holding a symbolical cup of sufi'ering, in allusion to our Lord's words, "Can ye drink of the cup that I drink of ? " etc. In St. Augustine's time there was a tradition that St. John was not dead, but sleeping alive in his grave at Ephesus, and would so remain till Christ came. [.S'cc St. John xxi. 23.] There has been a church at Rome ou tlie spot where tlie miracle of the boiling oil is believed to have occurred ever since the time of the first Christian emperors. The day is kept as a great festival at St. John's College, Cambridge, and at St. John's, Hurstpierpoint. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Ecclus. xv. 1-6. St. John xxi. 19-24.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — About two hundred and forty. 19] Dun.stan, ARcnnisnop of Canterbury. — "Of whom," says Bishop Godwyn, " I know not how to write, that which is delivered of him is so infinite." He was born in Somerset, of nol)le parents, and was educated in Glastonbury Abbey. Thence, through the introduction of his uncle Athelm, Arch- bishop of Canterbury, he passed into the household of King Athelstan, aud thence into tliat of Alphego the I'ald, l?ishop of Winchester, who persuaded him during an illness to take monastic vows. He accordingly became a monk at (Uaston- bury, the great Benedictine house in which he liad been educated, and which now obtained with him all his paternal estate. Soon he became Abbot, and through tlie reigns of Edmund and Edred was a leading man in Church and .State. At the coronation of Edwy in 955 he boldly rebuked the King for alleged profligacy ; and jiartly this, partly his f.avouriiig the cause of the monks ag.iinst the secular clergy, led to his being banished in 95G, when he retired to the Abbey of St. Peter in Ghent, while in England monks were per- secuted and abbevs devastated in all directions. In 95" Edg^i- was chosen by the Mercians as their Under-king, and Dunstan was recalled. Edwy dying in 958, Edgar held the sceptre of the whole kingdom, and about that time Dunstan M'as made Bishop of Worcester and of London together, from which sees he was translated to the primacy in 9G0. As Archbishop, his great object was to promote monasticism, and to compel the married secular clergy to put away their wives and live as cehbates, believing as he did that thus he should best raise their spiritual tone and general character, which no doubt were often lamentably low. In short, he was an earnest and severe reformeraccording to the light that lie had. He went about preaching and instructing the people in the cliurches of his diocese, and sometimes retired to Glastonbury for rest and spiritual recreation. He had early become an able craftsman iu various ecclesiastical arts as well as a .skilful musician. When Edgar died in 975 he favoured the election of Edward ["St. Edward," March ISth], and during the reign of the cliild-king Etlielred, which followed the murder of Edward, he was as Jelioiada the high priest who watched over King Joash. He was indeed, though not strictly speaking a saint, yet a truly great and good man ; and his name, though known to too many only in connection with a grotesque legend, ought rather to be had in remembrance as that of one of our noblest English prelates. Having preached thrice at Canter- bury on Ascension Day, a.d. 988, he died on the Saturday following, and was buried iu his o«n Cathedral. [Sar. Ep. aud Gosp.: Ecclus. xliv. 17-20, 21-23; xlv. 6, 7, 15, 16. St. Matt. xxv. 14-23. During Easter-tide, St. John xv. 1-7.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Hereford. Dedications of Churches — Eighteen. Represented — Seizing the devil with pincers ; a dove, or angels, near him ; playing on a harp. 26] ArC.rsTINE, first ArCHELSHOP of CANTERBtTRY. — Nothing is known of him until we find him " Pr;epositus " of St. Gregory's Monastery of St. Andrew in Rome [ilarcli 12th], when in a.d. 596 he was selected by Gregory to conduct the mission to England. The way had been prepared by the marriage of Ethelbert King of Kent with the Prankish princess Bertha, and by the supremacy of Kent among English kingdoms at that time. At the bidding of Gregory, who had long watched for and now saw his opportunity, Augustine set oft' from Rome with several others of his house, obedient and hopeful. But having travelled as far as into Provence, they became faint-hearted, and would have returned. So, staying probably in the ilonastery of Lerins, they sent back Augustine to ask that they might be excused from so perilous, toilsome, and uncertain an enterprise. Gregory, however, \\ell knew how best to "uphold the feeble knees ;" and on July 23, 596, sent Augustine back to them with a kind and encouraging letter, writing also letters on their behalf to bishops and kings whom they might see on their way. They wintered in Ciaul, and, soon after Easter iu 597, crossed the Channel and landed at Ebbsfleet, in Kent. Augustine and Etlielbert, after interchanging messages, had a meeting in the open air. The King and his tlianes took their seats, and saw some forty men approaching, with a silver cross upborne before them, and a painted and gilt representation of our Lord, such as might have been seen before in the household of Bertha. They also chanted litanies as they walked, which, though in an unknown tongue, may well have had a striking effect. The King bade the strangers sit down, and a conference was carried ou through a Gallic interpreter. He then not only allowed them freely to preach among his people, but invited them to follow him to Canterbury, where he assigned to them a dwelling. There they taught both by precept and by example ; they sang tlie Psalms, prayed, celebrated, preached, baptized, and in the course of the summer Ethelbert himself believed and was baptized. His example told upon his subjects, and though none were compelled, many became Christians. The next stop for Augustine w:is to obtain episcopal consecration, and for this purpose he went to Aries, and was consecrateilIon notices at the end of an ancient hymn, "vj. id. Mali natalis S'ci Bedfe Presbyteri," which he supposes to be the day of his trans- lation. In a Durham calendar of the fourteentli century [Harl. MS. 1804], May 27th, is entered " Comm. Bede." Although not in the ordinary Salisbury Calendars, the Saint is commemo- rated on this day in tlie " Enchiridion ad Usum Sarum, 1530." We know very little of the quiet and uneventful life of the Venerable Bieda or Bede except from the brief autobiography at the end of his Ecclesiastical History. He was born a.m. 672 or 673 on the domain given by Eegfrith for Wearmouth Abbey [begun a.d. 674]. At seven years old he was put under the care of Benedict Biscop, the Abliot of Wearmouth. He goes on to say : " I have passed all my life since then in the same monastery, and have given my whole attention to study- ing of tlie Scriptures, and in the intervals of my observance of the monastic discipline and of the daily occupation of chanting in the Church, I have always found interest in cither learning, teaching, or writing." He was taught by Trumberht, and probably also by John the Archchauter, whom Benedict brought from Rome about A.D. 677. "In my 19th year," he says, "I was ordained deacon, and priest in my 30th, both at the hands of the most reverend Bishop Joliu ['St. John of Beverley'], and at the bidding of Abbot Ceolfrith. From the time tliat I was ordained priest till now, when I am 58 years old, I have occupied myself with wi'iting commentaries on the Holy Scriptures to suit my own needs and those of my brethren, gathered from the works of the venerable fathers, and eitlier briefly given or as a para- phrastic interpretation of the sense. " But lie also wrote treatises on astronomy, meteorology, physics, music, philoso- phy, grammar, rhetoric, arithmetic, and medicine, as well as the Lives of iSt. C'uthbert and otiiers. His most important work, however, was his Ecclesiastical History. Nearly all that we really know of the century aud a half of English liistory which dates from the landing of iSt. Augustine, we know from him. He was the first English scholar, theologian, and historian, and, moreover, a statesman, as a letter written by him to Archbishop, then Bishop, Egbert clearly proves. At some time after the foundation of Jarrow in a.d. 682 he went thither, aud there be died on tlie Eve of the Ascension, May 25, A.D. 735, and was buried in the Abbey Churcli of SS. Peter and Paul. A letter from one Cuthbert to Cuthwin, a brother monk, gives an aS'ecting account, which cannot be abridged, and is too long to be inserted here, of the last hours of their old master. [.S't'c Sunday after Ascen.sion.] Alcuin relates a beautiful anecdote of him in a letter to the monks of Jarrow. " There can be no doubt," he says, " that the holy places are frequented by the visits of angels. It is related that Bsda, our master and your blessed patron, used to say, 'I well know that angels visit the congregations of lirethren at the canonical hours. What if they should not find nie there among my brethren ? Will they not say. Where is Ba-da ? Why comes he not with bis brethren to the prescribed prayers ? ' " His bones were said to have been removed to Durham Cathedral in a.d. 1020 ; and a plain tomb in the Galilee, where the shrine formerly stood, bears the well-known leonine verse, " Hac sunt in fossa Baedaj Venerabilis ossa," in modern letters. There are three different legends professing to account for the title of " Venerable," which seems to have been assigned to B.i'da about the ninth century. Calendars — York on 26th ; Monastic, 27th ; Roman Martyro- logy, 27th, as his " depositio " or burial. Dedications of Churches — None. Eepresented — As a monk. 29] See "State Services " in Appendix. 30] This day is often mentioned as "St. Andrew's Day in May," and " The Day of the Translation of St. Andrew ; " and is so called in several places in the churchwardens' account- book of St. Andrew Hubbard. Eastcheap, London, which were written about a.d. 1465. 150 Cf)C CalcnDat luttf) tfjc Cable of Ics.sonief. d d > -• ' +3 oi < a C4 c Ij, 12 .£ >•?•? ■? X x'x 'x 'S >■ 'si "^ •=■ '5 .^ > i d ■? .'> . X :S .:=.&■'? '> O :a X > X X X X X •- !> s ►:] 53 >."?.S'x'i< > > ' — ' X X X X X X X X x-:;3 o ^• > o :S X X X X X X X X X X XXX jJJ.S o; § ;^ .^ ■>■?'?.!:; X "x x 'x'x X X >■■?■> 'S.b X *x 'p. o > - z o ::d J '^ . :=" .-: >' '> .'d 'S X '? X , > -..jiH ;>• d .2 'x 'x X 2j X X X X XX. > X X ;s c ■-■ « ^.So .S; > S X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX -.= SJ -; QOr^ t^ CI ^ ?i Si s ■^ •s >■ > 5 g C-1 .2 X X 1^ "x'x'x'x a _> ^ o 4J Pi o -2-S . l--l 00 1-; _• s ;i 2 = L-S s to *" o > M ^^ — CI — 2^ J .-J O CI X *>'-' X /5 3 l> 1^ i 3 '> X to SO a 3 Chron. xii. xiv. xvi. and xv XX. to r. 31 xxii. xxiv. xxvi. and x Kings xviii X .„■ X X X X . X r 1 X X X i go *x X S) a .Ei CO > 'x *x zra i. and ii v. viii. V. 15. X. to V. 20. eheniiali ii. V. vii. J'. 73 an xiii, V. 15. sther ii. v. ] .••r -2 m a 2 n CI CI CI CI CI CI CI &::! ^ W "-5 s ?. 1). 32tov.iJ. 17. . 1). 17. i. ii. to V. 35. ii. V. 35 to viii. ^■t o CO 1 < 1^ 'R c O CI vi. to V. IG. vi. V. 16. vii. viii. to V. 28 viii. i;. 28. CI o X CI X ci 'x i ii. to V. 22. ii. V. 22. iii. iv. to V. 32. ^'to CI oci ^. ;; » . . .** rCl P4 XXX X X X X X X X K X X < .„ > > !> > > > ." H s ,^ ^• CO in ^ 5 ^ d 71 X ^ Hi g d '« S'x 1 o CO X ^1 X X o CO o 4i in •i 1 o ■ iJ a ;^ a :=| . £U X ;; . :a t> > .2 X X X X X X X X X X 'x X »• ^ X'rt ■x'3 SO a X g :3 j; X N ;» .« •a "2 S "3 > ■> 'S I5 .£•?■ i c> CI (>) HH CI -< !z; w 1-5 S C3J a CO m -a. 1 S IS i 1 1 1 a o w 1 1 C3 o a. E3 ^ 1 ^ •s in rj J3 M ^ ^ H l-t T3 0) c rt o ^ 1 n ^ 3 » n IB 3 rj aaS ^^ —• — • — ■ — ■ a ^'A. S TJ -s" -t; -r 9 HH hH M I.H -3 to CJi O O dooo 000000 odoo r'5 Lt ..K '^ 00 J-.^ o l.C t CO CI ^ C5 00 t..CO icJTiImjJj O ■*«A< ^cot^tdio ■* eoB< h-t r^ f-i o MH 60>§ -HO < ..3 .CO J OJ C14 (U 0) -4-> •4-> ,:3 ^ c 04 «-5 -^ ^i 4i Oi m OJ 3 ^^ 'SI"' r: g !• E S <» . . ^ o 1-3 c2 C3 •^ d (D 1—1 c« O (D rd ■P C4-I o CD •r-i > t> c3 a o Q a: ^ Oh c fi S to ?? n1 a fo ^ GOO] -- ©■ ;^ -e C3 M to ■ indo, azari Padu 3 tA s^-s •73 i? cert B J5 rt S pq CO o .a H ci ;r 1-5 rt> S 2 Si rt Oj 1 g » 3 C3 ■'A 03 6043 -*2 fS h^ CO ns ^^ o-^ 3 S g OJ (-• r! r^ 'w ^ a f^l-3 moj COtZ! " Qj r;i ^ 2 rt Nf^ 1-5 O-ti -*:> S^ t*-( 'S a OS > ^ it ^ S ^P-i 5 MCKO O C3 ■« n 2 2 rtii, '2^ 'i c5 p 'o, ^^ g mm 'm. mi 50 >mm imm S ^ 3 -r . i-l M 03 S3h S.2 2 S ■73 CO H mm coco 3 eg o a w a ■3 1-5 c3 ^• mm^ Ph CO Ph - w £ <;,CC o mmO - rt pL a .2 "g '-^ a rt c? t. >■ § • _S a *:co o" mmO ■rt a Tl » ert Cl '^ S Ct, ^ rr A 0. P3 03 ■— ; .r" a 22 aS-^ c5 ,_^ a CO rt c4 2 i "^ a " m 60-2 > O rf ^ mmm mmm rt 00 a< 1- a r3 a u a 3 J^ m *:o3 CO m mm 152 Cfje a^inor IDoIj)Daj)s of 3iune. I] NicoMEDE, Roman Priest [?] and Martyr. — His name is found in the Sacramentary of St. Gregory on September 15th, and in the most ancient Calendars. But no reliance can be placed on the contradictory accounts of the particulars of his martyrdom. According to one of these, found only in the fabulous "Acts" of SS. Nereus and Achilles, he was flogged to death with leaded whips A.D. 81, his body being thrown into the Tiber, rescued by his deacon, and buried in the catacomb that bears his name. According to another account, equally nntrustworth}-, he was drawn over iron spikes, flung into a furnace, and flogged as above described, about A.D. 285. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xiv. 20, and xv. 3-6. St. Matt. xvi. 2-t-28. During Easter-tide, St. John xv. 1-7.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Aberdeen, Paris, and Austin Canons. On September 15th, the supposed day of his martyr- dom, Roman, ^Monastic, and Hereford. Dedications of Churches — None. Bepreseyited — With spiked club or leaded whip. 5] BoNTFACE, Bishop of Mentz and Martyr. — "Winfrith, afterwards named Boniface, was born about A.D. 680, at Crediton, in Devonshire. He early shewed great promise, and was intended by his parents for a secular career. But a visit of some monks to his father's house set him longing to em- brace tlie religious life ; and his father, though much opposed to such a step, sent liira at seven years old to a monastic school at Exeter, whence he proceeded to Nutescelle, in Hampsliire. Here he made such progress that he was appointed to teach others, and was ordained priest at thirty years of age. The adventurous mission of the Englishman Willibrord among the heatlien Frisians was then much talked of in English monasteries, and Winfrith longed to join the noble band beyond the sea. In a.d. 716 he crossed over for that purpose, but he met witli such opposition that he was obliged to return, whereupon he was made Abbot of Nutescelle much against liis will. In two years' time he obtained a release, and in a.d. 719 went to Rome, whence he was sent by Gregory II. into German}', where he had great success, as also in Friesland, Hesse, and Saxony, after which the Pope consecrated him missionary Bishop. Returning to liis mission, he had to encounter not ouly utter Paganism, but a wild mixture of Paganism and Christianity. There vas a venerable oak at Fritzlar, hallowed for ages to Thor the Thunderer ; and Boniface, attended by his clergy, went forth and felled this tree, building out of its wood a chapel to St. Peter. He also founded many churches and a monastery, visited Rome twice again, and procured many missionaries from England. Having long laboured with great zeal and success, and obtained the titles of Archbishop and Primate of all Germany, he was at last attacked by a party of heathen ruffians, who fell upon him and several of his converts. The Archbishop, seeing that his hour was come, took a book of the Gospels and made it a pillow for his head, stretching forth his neck to receive the blow of one who beheaded him with a sword [June 5, a.d. 755]. Several of his letters and sermons are extant. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : 1 Cor. iv. 9-14. St. Matt. X. 23-26. During Easter-tide, St. John xv. 5-7.] Calendars — All except Roman, Paris, and Hereford. Dedirnlions of Churches — Two. Represented — With book pierced with sword ; a club ; a scourge. II] St. Barnaba-s, Apostle and Marttr. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Clturchcs — Six. Represented — With St. Matthew's Gospel in his hand, aa it was a tradition (most improbable) that lie carried about with him one written by the Evangelist's own hand ; with a staff, or a stone, or stones. 17] St. Alean, Martyr. — During the persecution of Dio- cletian and Maximian, which began A.D. 303, according to Gildas and Ba;da, though the Englisli Chronicles date the martyi-dom in A.D. 283, Alban, a Romano-British Pagan, sheltered a Christian cleric fleeing from persecution, and by him was instructed in the faith, converted, and doubtless baptized. After some days soldiers were sent to arrest the fugitive. Alban put on his teacher's cloak (amphibalus) and gave himself up in his place. The magistrate, indignant at his having shielded a ' ' sacrilegious rebel, " gave him the usual choice between sacrificing to idols and speedy death. Con- fessing himself a Christian, and refusing to sacrifice, he was beheaded outside the gate of tlie great Roman city Verula- mium, on the rising ground wliere the Abbey and English town of St. Alban's afterwards arose. Many legendary additions gi-ew up around this simple story ; and the priest, whose name does not occur in the earliest accounts, nor in the latest Sarum Breviaries, was afterwards called "Amphi- balus " from his cloak, figuring under that name in some martyrologies and in the York Breviary, and having a shrine at St. Alban's. The shriues of both St. Alban and St. Amphi- balus were recovered in the year 1872; each being recon- structed out of fragments that had been used as walling material. St. Alban is honoured as the protoniartyr of Britain, and in the later middle ages he was hailed in a hymn as " prothomartyr Anglorum, miles Regis Augelorum." [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Wisd. iv. 7-11, 13-15. St. Matt. xiv. 24-28.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Hereford, and Aberdeen on the 22nd, 17th in ours being a mistake. Dedications of Churches — Eight. Rejyresented — As a layman, with a tall cross ; with a sword. 20] Tr.an,slation of Edward, King of the West Saxons. — It is mentioned above [March 18th] that men buried St. Edward at Wareham without any kingly worship. Under the year 980 the Chronicles say, " Here in this year S. Dunstanus and .^Ifere ealdorman fetched the holy king S. Eadward's body at Wajrham, and carried it with mickle worship to Scajftes- byrig " [Shaftesbury]. Florence of Worcester [anno 979] saj's tliat the body was uncorrupt. This translation is com- memorated on the 20th of June. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xxxi. 8 11. St. Luke xiv. 26-33.] Calendar — Sarum only. Dedications of Churches — See March ISth. 24] Nativity of St. John Baptist. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep, and Coll.] Dedications of Churchi,^— Three hundred and ninety. Represented — Witli raiment of camel's hair, carrying the Agnus Dei standing on a book, or painted on a round disk, or with the Lamb near him. 29] St. Peter, Apostle and Martyr. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep and CoU.] Dedications of Churches— 'Eight hundred and thirty, two hun- dred and thirty with St. Paul, and ten with some other saint. Represented — With a key or keys, rarely one, generally two, sometimes three ; sometimes as a Pope : sometimes with an inverted cross. 154 Ctjc CalcnDar toitb tfjc Cable of Lc0sons. 1 ci 1 ■- w IC .«• .„■ w ^- OJ ~ ::::: a tn : — - 4) .„■ ::: ;? 1^ s .„•:= >• -3.^:3 i>-H ._; :^ ._; := P ._; > ■ "- H . .^ >' -iJ ^ i M pj ■"'"•"o "- ■" CI ■" CI "~ ■'"' •"H"" SW-- := ■,~ i Si: Cd g 5 >■ o :;.„-:3 .:=■.>■•?■§ .:^>->xxxxx ■>< M^ .:3 _> -r; '> X ;a .« ■> '> X X X X n 1-* f^ w .£ > i> X > > y, X X X X X X X X X E^ O 3 «"i >• A C z o J ■"■.c: t-'^^'S'P.S ><■■>< 'x '>< ■- 9 •? >.2 . .rH la.S >• ■?"=?■? .id CI X ^■^ ■- .C > > X X X XXX X X X X 1 > :3 > > .5 X X X X X ■x X •- >'>.2 :5 > v:i .„-:S >"■> X X X X Oh H :c > > X aj;3 1-5 X X X X X X X X X ~2« o ^ R ^ c: > a ■- S 3 S "" O > t~: « . CO 3^~ '^^ o ^• ^S2 -•?iS O . ,' CO . ^ -: '-' feci ;; o ■-5 V. 2 Jol 3 .Jul Jude Matt ii. iii. iv. >' .• >'> T ?* '5 >.d .2 X X 'x x "x 'x'x'3 .>>■>•■? X X X X ^^ C5 , ^,'-', o 5S la > lO > d s X " '■^ cc = >■'— ' X •■ ^ So . to V. 23. ii. to V. 17. iv. u. 21. vi, to w. 21. CI . rH ^ > ■> X X X B .Z o CI :3 >■ 00 q ^ s:5.> ■?■> X > > X X X X X X X X M X XXX X X X X X X •>'2 X ^ ■p M . " X CI X -H ■ • ^i* - :3 =i o . .♦J ^ .2 ii x' O , . .s :s >' >■■> ■?■>■? 5 ci Oh 1 "S > > > > > XXX X X X X X X X X C < >< X XXX X XXX XXX X X X X X X X X o ^ 1. X § =?"2 P O S g5 X «" .s ?i O L 21j i^ . 1-3 c 1 ^ .::;' .:3.£^?^S'S X XXX XXX t ^\ o . +3 +3 i-H ^ -■ si >•■?■ . — o X •- -5 > .5 X X X <^ >>xxxxxx X X XXX X Cm X X X X X X X >> d a . >. (3 -a S § ■a M o 1 1 CO > !- >Q O 1 CJ= s s ^5 1 g pq a >■ 1 •s -^ 1 § t3 t2 ^ ^5 « a 1 a: M n .... a < 1 -a O cacao OOOO'ZS-: HH . .-a •a-ci-' HHHH :3 rt c3 rt Tf'cC CI "3 66 OOJ rt rt c3 » I.O ■*■ «Ph 1— ( -^ 'Ph CO * ift to t^eo 2SS ?i S5S SSR Sci coco Comparison of CalenDars. '55 c2 -^ -^ o 0:1 o > •H ft a o O d.t: B^ OJ ■s fi s a -=1^ r,;'-' Bpq f3 **:; Cosmas tment of n Mary. W<5 ./ 8 M -4J -4J cot' rjim aj CO = .5 '-c ^ ° jt "S ° o a °-- S gp^^ PhCl, r" "^■^ "^ 2 Si^ a CO 4J .ii CO .*i .*j +3 'X .X x M CO CO CO -a Ph W MS bi o " 1; .0 . . . CO cocoto tj in =1 13 M _ 4) S la S o t^ O «) '^ CO CO !» ■|.i M I^P-i o J3. 60 3 O P4 H CO a 3 CO CO a t^ .ti fe Ti O •i |2| S 1 « = ^ ':;^ a •— I r» o OT o 3 .g COX • 3 a ' S-3l" a i a-"T3 E ■ O [S OJ m Wx go 0) nC^ S g s ^H OJ ^ rt +3 4J '— +3 J ■X 'Ji PQ c/:. ,^ a >> o a &■ E c3 £-1 a J. 2 =3 " E! . '^ .a aJ a033 c3 M .2 "a & ;3 3 m- g 3j a m .5 OJ ,^ o ^ C; X ^ HH k-^ -^"^ rt X XX -t> XXX XXX X xco IP rt 4j "^ s X " X Pi^.a a - fc- rt .a rt -H 3 cu o rt'^^ ■* a ' X •'x X X rt a to s; W^ - £?rt a J a g-'g 'm 'Sb w X X a -g rt •2^-2 rt .e?5.:3 H CO 'o w . X rt O W rt e "rt tD-i «'S 5 QJ « 60 ►> rt S^ rt P< o tH w 02 a X" X fe S s 0) BOB rt a ^ i-j-g-S X • § . 2 X BS H X « rt X X ■3 2 J o <»o o -< J4 '^ ^■^ 3 X c» CO Ti o rt Sh - Ph 2 x« X a 'S _: ^ a aS J2 'm a a. 2 ^ m X ^ ° >>2 rt'til a -p rt-T;^: o >3^-a a ■434 a -a g J3 S •.- se S xxH J3 ^ rt _ 4J 4a X XXX •r- . R S S '^ o"r; c Ph^ rt ^ ^ rz; ft . P^ rt -x CO ^ t-. Oj •*^ OJ ^ ^- P< « rt Qj rt d Sii^' O 4S X X X § »5 X !- O) ^"Sx a ^ a '^^ S a , t-t . •Sg^.a rt „ -^ .-S.3 2 & .2 M)Sx r— rt o 2 rt-J3 •2J3 Eh H 3-3 3 a fe CO xO o o . ,4 o O ^ ,1^ •4343 S a g aW. tH 2 t* rt J^ rt rt a ' 3 ~ .2 a -^ ■»' o g |0 a M .^ ^ '^ J2 <3o"^' 4J 43 X XXX =« a X o feS2 K X X >^ t^ X^' .a X X x-g . .-::n > X X X X X X X X "x X — • ; :- ^ > ;> > > i X X X X X X X XXX X X X X X . "" . t-':3 ^ xvii XXX Dan. N ;> X >■? "> x' X X ^ »^K (M j; ^' X« 'x _- Ol X ' I ^" o :sr); .--H o T* :3 CO ,^ ~ X ,. o . CO CO -H -< 5. ci -■ o „■ ; —I ■* no i^' b . CO " o n > > > X X X X > > X X X X ; .„• ;i3 •"" IN X X ^ '■ " " X X X Xl2.-:: 02 CO -p 00 n w ..•2?3 = 0.8"" .« ^ ..,; :s 'S "x o >'?'>'x n ^ o :3 .j:=:3 > > .S X X X X X X X X > X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x; j'-o..^ tj P^ 1— 1 05 irf >■ o'S 00 a ,. CO ^ . c) . ca ^ ci ^ ^ ^. Oi .• "5 •n QO _•<» a .SP 4^ - O . o .• « R t^CI O . ^j :j 'S ■" ^ ;j3 t« > 5 U ^ •S'P.S.-i >_> X X X X X X X X rH .^* Ui* C3 " S.S.S > > > ^^ (N s X.2 X o: ii. t . to- 5 ..A R >■ 'p X Hi X X XVI. xWii o fi 1— t X > > X X X X X X X X X X 3 > > X X X X X X X X X X X X ^ w o •A •s 1 o ^ C^J^l C! ■6 .-§1;= a MP . < a .a§-s a g O 60 i 1 X !« t» « 3 60 . . a n a o -a 'O 'CT3 "w 'w I"" c3ff3ciS<4cdc3cSc3c3c3 oooooooooo ^coPM (z;ot t~ «: 115 -* CO &H r^ O X t^o W^-^COtNf-iOCSODt^O LO ^"& u 'w O <.-4 110) IN IN IN c5 CT o« fS 5i«e scS 4i rr fi B 02 -J2 rt i-i § Q ^ p:i rt ^ •si q 5 HqW W§ S 00 X -5 opH -*j -*i tZ} &4J ct X c/j •/: ^ W c3 a 0^ p- c3 c! w :-< "o fi: 1"^ •-5 »J§ -l-s r/^ = cj ^ s -S *o H-1 "? - "m a rt N^<1 s fd -w 4-3fy} ^ r/j ^iji-ri p C/J a C4 CIQ _« '^ c^ O A -p o c« a" coco HH 5 03 « t/J t-l <1 yj Tl V) VJ a %* 00 W ^53 s a =4 .^■k •rH ft o O .3 a j5 _ O a CC02 1-1 2 .-/"' m r/' S C »! 60tx< =3 ^- I 2 g S' „• a; 2 . '-' ci H l3 O 3 2 2 i S g a -^ 5>^'e; f= S £ s - .-s >> — ^ a a Ja Oia^-SS W o^ S'Sb ^- ^ ^ ^ »^ .^y} coome, in which one of the chains which fell off St. Peter is said to be kept. St. Peter /« Carcere is the dedication of another church in Rome over the Mamertine prison, where St. Peter is believed to have been confined. Calendars — All have St. Peter ad Vincula with the Seven Maccabees, whose bodies are supposed to rest under the high altar of the Church of St. Peter ad Vincula in Rome. Dedications of Churches — One, within the precincts of the Tower of London, to St. Peter ad Vincula. 6] TE-isSFiGUHATiON' OF OUR LoRD. — This festival has long been kept in East and West, though not always on this day, in memory of the Transfiguration, and in the Greek Church it is called the Feast of Tabor, while our forefathers called it ' ' The Overforniing of our Lord on the Mount Tabor. " Pope C'alixtus III. issued a bull for its general observance on this d.iy [a.d. 1457]. This festival has never ranked with the others of our Lord, being of much later institution, and its theological significance being less evident than that of the rest. The Transfiguration was, however, a type and earnest of our Lord's second coming in glory, and of the future glory of the risen bodies of His members. In the Sarum ilissal the mass of the day is preceded by the blessing of the new grapes. There was a custom for the deacon to press a small quantity of fresh grape-juice into the chalice for Mass, probably a survival of an offering corresponding with that of Lammas Day [August 1st]. The Emperors of Constantinojile, the Patriarch, aud the members of the Court used to have a ceremonial presentation of grapes to one another in a vine- yard. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : 2 St. Pet. i. 16-19. St. Matt. x^'ii. 1-9.] Calendar.i — All except Hereford. [Cologne, ninth centurj', July 27th.] 7] Name of Je.sus. — This festival does not appear to liave been generally observed until the beginning of the sixteenth century. In 1-19S it was kept with the Transfiguration on August 6tli. Portions of St. Bernard's well-known hymn, " Jesu, dulcis memoria," were sung in the Sarum Offices aud Mass. The special point which this day sets before us is, the peculiar sanctity of that Name at which every knee should bow, a sanctity in some respects analogous to that of the Sacred Name liy which God was known to His people of old, but representing to us the love of the Saviour rather than the self-existence of the Godhead. On the "Seven Names," see December 17th. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Acts iv. 8-12. St. Matt. i. 20-23.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Aberdeen. Represented — By the monogram it): or tlis, Latin forms of IHC, the beginning of the old Greek IHCOTC, 10] St. Laurence, Archdeacon of Rome and Martyr.— Nothing is certainly known of St. Laurence's early years, but the Spaniards claim liim as their countryman. He was ordained deacon by Sixtus or Xystus II., and soon afterwards appointed chief of the seven deacons who served in the Roman Cliurch. The Christians were at this time under- going the eiglith general persecution, that of Valerian, and Sixtus w.a9 led to martyrdom a.d. S.IS. Laurence, his deacon, made a most affecting appeal to be allowed to sufl'cr with his "father," whom he had so often assisted in offering the Holy Sacrifice. This did not come to pass; but within a week he drew on himself the fury of his persecutors by distributing the property of the Church among the poor Christians, and when asked to deliver it up, sliewiug Christ's poor instead as the true treasure. He was then laid on an iron frame like a gridiron, and slowly burned to death over live coals. He suffered with marvellous fortitude, praying for the conversion of Rome. Prudentius in a beautiful hymn ascribes the con- version of that city to the martyr's intercession. Ho is named in the earliest known Roman Calendar, a.d. ^'A, and in the Communicantes in the Canon of the Mass. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : 2 Cor. ix. 6-10. St. John xii. 24-26.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — About two hundred and fifty, and three with other Saints. Eepi-e.tented — As a deacon, with gridiron, and with thurible, church and book, long cross-staff, or money-bag. 24] St. Bartholomew, Apostle and Martye. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — About one hundred and fifty. Eejn-esented— With, a flaying-knife in his hand ; sometimes a human skin on his arm. 28] ST.Auau.sTiNE, Blshop of Hippo, Confessor and Doctor. — This great confessor and doctor of the Western Church was born at Tagaste, in Numidia, November 13,a.d.354. Hisfather was one Patricius, a pagan, and his mother the holy Christian Monica, commemorated as a saint in the Latin Church on May 4th. Augustine apjiears to have had a liberal educa- tion, but to have been early corrupted by theatres and other immoral influences in Carthage, whither he had been sent to learn rhetoric, etc. Here, at the age of eighteen, he became the father of a son named Adeodatus. Cicero's writings excited the philosophic spirit in his mind, and he at first thought he saw in ManicliKism a solution of all difficulties. But it could afford him no lasting satisfaction. His discovery of the superficiality of Faustus the Manichaean prevented him from committing himself to Manich.-eanism, and while in an unsettled state, he wrote, at the age of twenty-six, on "The Beautiful and the Fitting." In a.d. 383 he went to Rome to teach rhetoric, and there lived much among the Manichees, whose heresy he at length quite abandoned, and joined the Academicians, only to find in the conflict of philosophies as much bewilderment as ever, and, on the whole, inclining to general scepticism. In a.d. 384 he removed to Milan, where he gradually feU under the influence of St. Ambrose, as also of his mother, who now came to live with him, with his friend Alypius, his brother Navigius, and his son Adeodatus. Her influence told for good on the young men in many ways. The mother of Adeodatus, with whom Augustine had so long lived, was cruelly sent back to Africa without her son at Monica's entreaty. Augustine had not yet found rest and strength in Christ, nor could he find them in Plato, whose works he read in a Latin translation. He could not long deny the existence of evil ; the sins of which his own con- science was full cried out against such teaching. He con- sulted Simplician of Milan, listened to the discourses of St. Ambrose, conversed with Pontitian, an African Christian, studied St. Paul's Epistles, and went to church with Alypius. The story of St. Anthony went to the depths fif his inmost soul. He felt that Christ and His Gospel were living powers. He longed for the pure and blessed life of those holy ones who followed Christ. But he liad to struggle with his love of pleasure, liis passions, his earthly ties. And as he lay down and wept, he heard a child's voice singing ToUe, Leije. The words went to his heart ; he opened the roll of St. Paul's Epistles and read, "Not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying. But put ye on tlie Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof" [Rom. xiii. 13, 14]. This was the turning-point. On Easter Eve, April 2'), a.d. 387, he was baptized Viy St. Ambrose at Milan, together with Alypius and Adeodatus, and on the following day they were admitted to their first Communion. The legend that St. Ambrose and St. Augustine together composed the Tc Demn on this occasion may have some foundation in fact. How- ever this may be, Augustine was now happy. As he says himself, the notes of the hymns .and canticles of the Church flowed in at his ears, and God's truth revealed itself in his heart, and he wept for joy ; it w.as well for him to be there. But soon probably he would be involved in the conflict between Ambrose and Justina [.April 4th]. Monica died too about this time, aiul the loud weeping of Adeodatus was checked by Augustine, who thought such a display of sorrow inconsistent with Christian hope. At length, however, nature prevailed, and Augustine also wept. They found com- fort in praying for Monica, and "the sacrifice of our ransom was offered for her. " So f.ar we are mainly indebted to St. Augustine's own Confessions for the particulars of his life ; the rest is g.athereil from a life of him liy his friend Possidius. and from scattered allusions in his epistles, etc. Want of space forbids more than a very hasty glance at the remainder of his history. He was at Komc a.d. 388, and in 'A'M was ordained priest by Valerius, Bishop of Hippo, the city of the Nmuidi.an kings, but now more famcuisas the See of Augustine. C{)C 0©inor IDolpDap0 of august. i6i Here he preiichod a great deal for Valerius, and corrected an abuse of the mjapif, a custom of which we perhaps have a sur- vival iu the panU hcne.dlclus distributed in France. In A.D. 395 he was consecrated Bishop, and soon was much occupied in the famous ecclesiastical controversy with the Donatists, and had a literary correspondence with St. Jerome. From 412 to 418 he had to combat the heresy of Pelagius, and was him- self led into exaggerated statements of doctrine, and into a persecuting policy. He seems to have forgotten how by an exercise of his own freewill he had himself cast off the ohl man and his deeds, and was disposed to attribute to Divine (irace a constraining power destructive of human freedom, and to have laid down maxims most dangerous to morality. He wrote a letter to Sixtas, priest of Rome, which gave rise to much controversy, the Galilean Church especially combat- ing liis views. In A. D. 427 he published "Retractations," — not a recantation, but a survey and revision, — the result of a calmer consideration of former statements. In .Tune A. D. 430, Hippo was besieged by the Arian Vandals, but Augustine ceased not to preach and to worU till in August he was pro- strated by fever, and on August 30th he died in his seventy- seventh year. In his last hours he repeated tlie Penitential Psalms with many tears, and had them fixed on the wall opposite to his bed. His body was buried .at Hippo, removed to Sardinia fifty-six years after by exiled African Bishops, and A. P. 710 redeemed from the Saracens by Luitpraiid, King of the Lombards, Since then it has been at Pavia, Init in 1837 some portions were sent to a church in Algeria, on the ruined site of Hippo. [Sar. Ep. and Goap. ; Kcclus. xlvii. 8-11. St. Matt. V. 13-19.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churehes — Twenty-nine, except any ■which may be to St. Augustine of Canterbury [May 2(ith]. liepresented — With a burning heart, or a heart with one or two arrows ; with an eagle. 29] Beheading of St. Joun Bapti.st. — This minor festival of St. John Baptist commemorates his death as related in St. Matt. xiv. 1-12. It probably took place sliortly before the Passover. The 29th of August is the day of the dedication of a basilica at Alexandria on the site of a temple of Serapis, in which basilica reputed relics of St. John B.aptist were kept. Portions are shewn at Amiens, Home, and elsewhere. One of the explanations of the name of " Halifax," the church of which parish is dedicated to St. John the Baptist, is that the halig feax, or holy hair, of the Baptist was shewn at a hermitage there : a tradition embodied in the present arms of the town, though there are, perhaps, other explanations at least as probable. The nativity of .St. John the Baptist [.Tune 24th] is observed as his greater festival, because of its miraculous character and its connection with that of our Blessed Lord. [Prov. x. 28-32, and xi. 3, G, 8-1 1. St. Mark vi. 17-29.] Calendars — All. Represented — The headless body prostrate, the daughter of Herodias holding a charger with the head in it, and the executioner looking on. 102 Ctjc CalenDar toitlj tU Cable of Lessons. . .„. o iH 1 1 w 1 ls.& >-p:>" •> X X x *x "xx X X 2:..= .^ >' •5-?I.H X ._• :a:3.>t.- X X X X X d ►J O o .«■ ._ ■^■:a ffi- > .2'j-s| := 1= -^ a o >-5 s fl :3 .J.«* «>1 < n 43 :5.£ >•■>•? :d X . .-■ :2 (>• >••?■ '>'>.b X ■^ :a:S.> >■•> X X X X X X X S ..-• 1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X xg:=:= fl' > 'x • 5 £o •- =^ :a -■ := •- : = ^ o ^ o X a o 1-5 :=•§ "> ■3 -2 £ '> x'x'x 1 -^1 •^ o :3 o X (M • -■«^:=^- S? '> ;> O tS ix. V. 30. x. to V. 32. X. D. 32. xi. to V. 27. xi. V. 27 to xii r ■^ s ^- . . s ^s-^ s >• 1 i. to V. 1 4. i. D. 14 to i. V. 30. ii. to V. 24. ii. w. 24 to o S s »• X :n >" > > o > -■ .„■ >" •< « Ph o i > > > > > > X X X X X X X x^ g o <— > ^•2-« :5 . .SI ■2 -s " =■; . OS :• -§ 5 "^ »■ a iv. to w. 13. V. 8. and xii. to v. [7. ii. to V. 15. . 28 to iii. if. 9. 3 i. and ii. to [i>. 4. O CO s X X X X X X X X X X X X X fl X X X X ^ Q .-; > >■ >> .b "x g.„. > ^ ^ X g:= 1 •-5 < « ^ .«■ ^ ?^' ■*' := ^c6 ^ g C4 5,-:3 .«' « ^ 5-' o CO V. o -*3 ■*3 c3 d t4* CO i ^ > < a Ph o X X X X X > X OS. !^ .„•:=.£ > '>'> '?.5 x'x *x V.-i:s\i.i .£ >••? ;a f-H IN C td O X a o i CO 5 is .S > X X X X X X X X 5 o '5 xxxii. to V. 17. xxxiii. r. 21. xxxiv. (I. 17. xxxvii. to V. 15. xlvii. to V. 13. o 'a; 2 ^ o ■S 00 §s.„- OS >-■•>. 2 X ffi^"^^' X o:a :3 a « " It. _^ i^ >i 52 d >> " o 2 (^ m 21 « a 3 QJ o > i <4 S .2 a> S" a J3 60 — .art oso 13 M p< n- h 43 A .. o .a 1 0) o ! St rt M 2" ■E .S. S a S > o >> (-1 a, .a p 3 ^ & W ^ ^ 1 a a o . "rt"!? "13 rt e3 13 •^ "rt "d *« 'd '5 "^ '«'rt "rt I«4 3 .*■ « Oh 1^ 00 M -a oo oocj:j u 00:^0^ 000^ . . . J- -5 ITS -^ CCPh HH ai I- 5D »0 ■* CO (N <-• oi cdt-i CD irj-^ cOjjJ t-^ !C ^H M-t t«D § sgsssss f, ssss Comparison of CalcnDars. 163 Ph 02 c2 d -^ PI O ,^ -p Cm O 0) •r-l ft a o O *"= to "^ a) M -tJ -ts ^H *^ ft. - (3 .a o mS n -r g .■ss g .£ ai-5 "S'Sb • « 03 W 50 H 2 »< bD ■da ceptio aptist. Thecla la C?Ph U uo gM . ,° -^ .u -t> .t. CCM w M UJX ■n a C8 m M »r 3 a 9 a ab ^ J3 .tJ « § ^ a & -, P^ OJ « M C/J O.' s a a ■fcb Sjd 3 -e > a.S a « . m oW ■u H-^ w " 't? a a 2 OT ^i j2 a L- p ^■J OKf^ ■S<5 ..J 4i C/2 l<^ rJlVlVl o W >, a O =3 CJ r3 ^^ aS2 ^■^ a a a a ■* °.; CP O >^ « E a t^ I •*^'^ s m a a o .2 '3 a rt . e-s a a o 3 °0 a'-" »i '^■%^ Bad 1+.1 to a . • S a 2-g e3 o-a-a a O O 3 •aO S ■a W m i-j 3 fi 1^ FT- , . « c3 a ^ r^ •a H E>>0 00 X 7!; +3 4:J .« Cl, o pq 02 >. 0) m W s a °^1 91 a >>w3 &D *' .15'* g a .2 a c5 fM 1^^ ^ CO a a; .3 . >> a to - So s'S S ^ a.iS' ■30 . . e3 to MM 02 .2 <5 11 .all 1 .2 2 43 GO CO +3 43 cococo ccco 1 -H (NM^ 10 ^ t^CO 00-1 CI m tX r-H r-l 1>» 1— 1 22asgj s s »« to r^ 00 ci Ol IM C-J (N C-J CO 3 O to- 3 4i a •SM .2^ a a feM H CO .b a t.« 3 .3-3 >.| to OS w a cj to 3 O to % 43 M a' . >> 3 a 4J S ^ H.£ SO o . k. CO S a :S a S 2 S Q 3 3-34^ (u .a t- ■ru o a ^ a rt5 S CO rt 43 ^ (U ,>* 1^ .3i ■*» '2 =3 rt '^Q ei a nin. iriau mas 5 3 E >:§ gQO ^►^ 43 CO CO muirXi Wro 3 C3 w t3 a O M M « a Sf "o b'a a le ,a S'^a^ . .£ rtO ^Si 3 ""« co-*^ cc a 05 2 «2 t-H g tn ^^ to to^ to S ^ g;§ S.a W 43 4^ ojco (8 to ■ eg 'r-l I-JJ3 a a . ea e3 2 ^ O) >> ta 3 a « I3 =a 7 2 ■^ 1^. CO 43 43 mui CO a S to S 3 S 3 p) o 3 o O CO 13 a ^ Q> >i §S| i^ a m a s "cj c5 4i ■^ to <^-5 ■si rt ^^ E W CO -4^ -ta r. -y::/: 164 CDe 8@mor i^olgoays of ^eptcmftec. 1] Giles, Abbot axd Confessor. — The earlier part of tlie legend of St. Giles, or /Egidius, according to which he was an Athenian who came to Marseilles and became acquainted with St. C-esarius of Aries, is given up by JIabillon and the BoUaudists as fabulous. His " Lives" are all later than the eighth century, and are full of anachronisms and marvels. They contain a beautiful story which may be founded on fact, relating how one day ChilJebert III., King of the Franks [cir. A.D. 695-711]. according to some, or Waraba, King of the Goths, according to others, was hunting in a forest, when the hunted doe fled for refuge into the cave of a hermit who had been nourished by her milk. They shot an arrow after the doe, and on entering the cave found Giles sheltering the poor beast, with the arrow in his own shoulder. Touclied at the sight, the King had the wound dressed, became the hermit's friend, built a monastery on the site of the care, and made Giles the Abbot. Afterwards the famous Charles Martel sent for him to Orleans to take refuge from the Saracens. In a.d. 721 thej' were driven back, and he returned to Iiis abbey, where he died before A.D. 725. A considerable town called "St. Giles's " arose about the abbey, which was a great resort for pilgrims. The story of the hunted doe is given with the incident of the arrow in the Sarum, York, and Aberdeen Breviaries, without it in the Koman. St. Ciiles is esteemed as the patron of cripples from his alleged refusal to be cured of a lameness, hence churches dedicated to him are often at the original entrances to cities, where cripples were accustomed to gather together and beg. He was also the patron of Edin- burgh, where a great image of him that had been carried in processions was destroyed by John Knox. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xxxix. 5-9. St. Luke xi. 33-36.] Calendars— AM. Dedications of Churches — One hundred and forty-six, and one with St. Martin. Jlepresenled — With the hind and the arrow in various ways ; with a milk-cup in his hand. 7] En'URCHUS, Bi.'shop of Orleans.. — The name of this Bishop as we have it is an erroneous reading of "Evurtius," found in the Calendar of 1604, and repeated in all subsequent editions. He is variously described as a martyr and as a confessor, and by Tillemont identified with Eortius, who subscribed the acts of the Council of Valence A. D. 074. In the Acta Satictortim he is placed under Constantine, but there are no trustworthy accouuts of him, and it is impossible to say how he found a place in our Calendar. The York Breviary has three lections to this effect — that he was a subdeacon of the Roman Church who came to Orleans at the time of a con- tested election to the see, and was designated as Bishop by a dove lighting on his head, the power of working miracles following on his consecration. When he perceived his end to be drawing near, he feared that the former dissension would be renewed after his departure, and so chose one Anianus as his successor. Calendai — York. Dedications of Chnrches — None. JReprese.nted — ^With the dove. 8] Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. — This festival, called "St. Mary's Mass in Harvest" [Laws of Alfred the Great, xx.], has a special Preface in the Sacrameutary of St. Gregory, and was very generally celebrated in the middle ages witli octave and vigil. As to the parentage of the Blessed Virgin, see July 26th. Nicephorus gives a descrip- tion of her personal appearance and character, purporting to come from St. Epiphanius, who in the fourth century derived it from a still more ancient source. See B.aring-Gould's Lives of the Saints. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xxiv. 17-22, and Wisd. iv. 1-7, alternately through the Octave, the latter being always read on Sunday and the Octave Day. St. Matt, i. 1-lG through the week, and on the Octave Day St. Luke xi. 27, 28.] Calendars — All. 14] Holy Cross Day. — This festival originally commemor- ated, as it has continued to do in the Eastern Church, that famous appearance of the "sign of the Son of Man in the heavens," which is said to have decided the conversion of the Emperor Constantine. But in Breviaries of the West the lec- tions relate mainly to the recovery by the Emperor Heracliua [a.d. 629] of that supposed portion of the Cross which had been preserved in a richly-jewelled case at Jerusalem [see May 3rd], and carried away by Chosroes, King of the Persians. Heraclius entered Jerusalem barefoot and meanly clad, hold- ing the {(recious reliquary in his arms. This being opened, the sacred wood was lifted up before the people, liencc pro- bably the fea.it is called the " Exaltation " of the Holy Cross, though some attribute both the name and the observance of the day to the original exposition of the wood in Constantine's new basilica, A.D. 335. In A.D. 635 Heraclius had to retreat before the Mohammedans ; and he then, foreseeing the speedy ruin of Jerusalem, carried the sacred treasure to Constanti- nople, after which its history becomes obscure. In the days when relics were multipbed, supposed particles of it were attached to other pieces of wood to preserve tliem, and these pieces in time came to be venerated as portions of the true Cross. The English name of this day was "Holy Rood Day in September," to distinguish it from "Holy Rood Daj' in May." [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Gal. v. 10-12, and vi. 1214- St. Johnxii. 31-36.] Calenda rs — All. Dedications of Chnrches — One hundred and six, two with St. Mary and one with St. Faith. Holyrood Abbey and Palace in Edinburgh are named from the famous " Black Rood of Scot- land," fabulously reported to have come down from heaven. 17] Lambeut, Bishop and Martyr. — St. Landebert or Lambert was born of Christian parents of rank and wealth at Maestricht, where, after a careful education, lie was com- mitted to the charge of St. Theodard, the Bishop, at whose death he succeeded to the see. When Childeric II., King of France, w-as dethroned and murdered, A.D. 673, Lambert, who was known to be his friend, was driven from his see by Ebroin, "Mayor " of JIaestricht, and retired to the Monastery of Stavelot, wliere he spent seven years in strict monastic obedience, while Faramoud, a Canon of Cologne, was put in his place as Bishop. In A.D. 6S1, however, Ebroin was murdered, the intruding Bishop expelled, and Lambert restored to his see. Here he laboured in converting the barbarous heathen inhabitants of that land of marshes, peat- mosses, and willow-holts, and multitudes came to his baptism. A hillock near the Meuse was long pointed out as a place where he used to sit and teach. About A.D. 709 Lambert's relations took it upon themselves to resent some invasion of the lands belonging to his see, and two members of a powerful family were put to death. Their relations in turn, resolving on revenge, and hearing that Lambert was at Liege, tlien a small place, fell uj5on him there and put him to death with a spear, as also his nephews Peter and Andeloc, who were trying to defend him. His sanctity of life led to his violent death being considered as a sort of martyrdom, as in the case of St. Edward the King [March 18th]. His body was sent in a boat to Maestricht, and buried in the Church of St. Peter. A church was built at Lifege on the place of martyrdom, and thitlier his remains were translated A.D. 721 by his successor in the See of Maestricht, which see was now removed to Liige. Thus the village became a great city, as it is at this day. But the Cathedral Church of St. Lambert was utterly destroyed at the Revolution, and its site is now a market-place. In the present cathedral, formerly the Collegiate Church of St. Paul, part of the Saint's relics are preserved. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Heb. v. 1-6. St. Matt. ix. 35-38, and x. 7, 8, 16.] Calendars — All except Roman. Dedications of Chmxhes — Two. Represented — With spear or dart in his hand or at his feet ; sometimes a palm-branch ; stabbed with javelins ; beaten with a club. 21] St. Matthew, Apostle, Evangelist, and Martyr. — [See notes on Gosp.- Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — Twenty-five. Represented — AVith a money-box or purse ; with a spear, axe, or carpenter's square. As Evangelist, with a winged man. 26] St. Cyprian, Archbishop of Carthage and Martyr. — This festival was originally kept, together with tliat of St. Cornelius, Bishop of Rome, on September 14th, but on account of Holy Cross Day was transferred to the 16th both in East and West. In our reformed Calendar the great St. Cyprian occupies the place of another of the same name, a converted magician of Antioch. Thascius Cypriamis was born at Car- thage about the beginning of the third century. His father was in a position to give him a liberal education, and he became a professor of rhetoric. At the persuasion of Ca;cilius, a presbyter, lie became a Christian, though not without a struggle that reminds us of St. Augustine. Like that dis- tinguished convert, lie finally embraced the Faith with all his heart, and was baptized. He sold his goods to feed the poor, and applied himself to the study of Holy Scripture and other sacred writings, particularly those of Tertullian. Assuming the name of his spiritual fatlicr, he was styled Thascius Creoilius Cyprianus. Not long after liis baptism lie was Cbe 0@moi- JjDolpDaps of %cpteml)cv. 165 ordaiued priest [a.d. 247], and soon after that was made Bisliop of Carthage, not without the strenuous opposition of a small party headed by Novatus and Felicisaimua. In the Uecian persecution, a.d. 250, he used tlie liberty which our Lord had given [St. Matt. x. 23], and fled for the sake of his flock, in obedience, as he says, to a Divine intimation that he miglit thus at that time best glorify Ciod. Tlie licathen had furiously raged together, crying, "Ci/prUwiis ail /eo/^c.v, Ci/pri- anus ad icsd/tts, " also calling him Copn'aiiiis, from the (ii'eck word for dung, thus fultilling literally the words of St. Paul[l Cor. iv. 13]. From his retirement he wrote many letters to liis clergy and took a most active interest in the welfare of his people ; and between the importunity of the lapsed to be at once restored to Church privileges, and the extreme doctrine of Novatian, that the lapsed could never be restored, he took so wise a course tliat many councils afterwards adopted it. He returned to Carthago after the Easter of A.D. 251, and held a synod, in which his own view was confirmed. During a dreadful pestilence which prevailed in A.D. 252 many blamed the Christians, and thought they could appease tlie gods by persecuting those who turned the people from them. But Cyprian won general goodwill and admiration by going about and doing works of charity among heathens as well as Christians. The African Church now had rest from without ; but the endless question as to the lapsed was revived under countless perplexing forms ; there was a dispute as to the age for infant baptism ; and lastly, the important controversy as to the validity of baptism by heretics and schismatics. Cyprian held, and his doctrines were confirmed by a numerous council held at Carthage A.D. 255, that such baptisms were in all cases null and \'oid, and hence his famous controversy ^vitll Stephen, Bishop of Rome, who held them to be valid if admin- istered with the right words and matter. In all this we hear nothing of Pa[]al Infallibility, or even Supremacy, nor of the Roman doctrine of "Intention." In a.d. 257' Cyprian was banished to Curubis, where he remained till the following year, when he was arrested in Carthage and commanded to sacrifice to the gods. On his refusal, the decree was read out that Cyprian should be slain with the sword, whereupon he responded, ' ' Deo gratias. " Wliile he was led out to execution the people wept, and said they would be beheaded with him. Being brought into a field outside the city, he took off his outer garments, knelt down at the appointed place, and prayed. Soon his head was struck off by the sword, and the faithful took the clothes stained with his blood, and buried his body on the Mappnlian Way. Two churches were after- wards built, one on the place of his burial, called Mappalia, the other on the place of his martyrdom, called Mensa Cypriana, because there, as in sacrifice, he had offered his life to God. In later times [a.d. 806] the body was removed to Aries, and later still to Compiegne, where it rested with that of St. Cornelius. The name of St. Cyprian is mentioned in the Commnnicanles in the Canon of the Mass. [.Sar. Ep. andGosp.: Wisd. v. 15-19. St. Matt. x. 23-25.] Calendars — All except the Austin Canons', with St. Cornelius, on the 14th. In Hereford and Paris a commemora- tion only, with St. Cornelius, on the 14th. [See above.] Dedications of Churches — One, Chaddesley, in Worcestershire. Represented — With a gridiron and a sword. 29] St. Michael and all Angels. ^[iSee notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — About six hundred. Represented. — St. Michael .is an angelic warrior, often in armour, contending with the dragon ; weighing souls in scales ; with scales simply. The nine orders of angels have various characteristic attributes, for which we must refer to special works on Iconography. They generally, however, have the names of their orders on labels or otherwise. Those of greatest dignity have fully-developed crowns ; while, to mark supposed degrees in rank, others have crowns less ornamented, or mere circlets with a single cross, or crosses over their fore- heads only, or plain caps or wreaths on their heads. 30] St. Jerome, Priest, CoNFEissoR, and Doctor. — St. Jerome was born in the earlier part of the fourtli century, of Christian parents, somewhere on the confines of Dalmatia and Pannonia. He received a liberal education, and was designed for the legal profession. At Rome he was instructed by Donatus the famous grammarian, as well as by one Victorinus, whose conversion is related in ,St. Augustine's Confessions. At this time he was in the habit of attending the courts to hear the lawyers plead, and he also used to explore the cata- combs. Strange to say, his baptism was deferred till he was quite a young man. Having been baptized, he made a journey into Gaul with his friend and fellow-student Bonosus, and passed some time at Treves, where he wrote his earliest works, and became impressed with deep religious feeling and earnest Christian zeal. From about A.D. 370 to 372 he was at Aquileia with his friend Rufinus. In A.D. 373 he suddenly set out for the East witli three friends, jiassing through Thrace, Bithynia, Galatia, Pontus, Cappadocia, and C'ilicia. At C:esarea tlicy saw the great St. Basil, and tlien journeyed to Antioch, wliere Joronio had a serious illness ; and he was still sull'ering from ill-iieallli tliere in tlie Lent of A.D. 374, when he did not consider himself exempted from the observation of tlie fast. He now abandoned the reading of profane authors, and gave himself to the study of divinity and the practice of asceticism, retiring with his books to a desert in Chalcis, where he severely chastised his body, and laboured hard to learn Hebrew. While he was yet in the desert the Meletiaii schism broke out. Jerome espoused the side of Paulinus, the Bishop recognized by Rome at Antioch, against that of Meletius recognized by tlie East. The East was distracted with controversy too as to the hypostasis ; and being urged to accept the phrase, Jerome applied to Damasus, Bishop of Rome, early in a.d. 377, who in the following year sent an answer to Paulinus. The same year he came to Antioch, and was ordained priest by Paulinus on the strange condition that he should not be expected to act as such. In a.d. 380 he went to Constantinople, where he remained two or three years, pursuing his own studies, and hearing the eloquent instructions of Gregory Nazianzen. In A. D. 381 Meletius died, but his partisans carried on the old contention ; and in a.d. 382 Damasus called Paulinus, with his followers and opponents, to Rome, wliere a council was held, and Jerome acted as secretary to Damasus. And now began that close friendship between the two which lasted till the death of the latter, at whose earnest request Jerome undertook that famous revision of the then received Latin versions of the Scriptures, which resulted in the Vulgate, as it afterwards came to be called, when some centuries after its author's death it had driven its elder rivals out of the field, and be- come the one recognized versicm of the Bible in the Latin churches. His growing fame drew around him a crowd of enthusiastic admirers, many of them noble ladies, to whom he represented as strongly as he could the heavenly graces of a single life. But he had so many enemies that he felt obliged to quit Rome after the death of Damasus in A.D. 384. He sailed in August A.D. 385 with several friends, and came to Antioch, having been hospitably received on the %vay by Epiphanius, Bishop of Salamis. He was now joined by Paula, a wealthy Roman widow, who came with a number of religious maidens. The whole party made a tour of the Holy Land, visited Egypt, returned to Palestine in A.D. 386, and settled at Bethleliem. Here Paula founded four monasteries, three for women and one for men, over which last Jerome presided. Here he passed the remainder of his life, engrossed in his pursuits ; while, unhappily, his declining years were, as his earlier years had been, embittered by fierce controversies. One serious dispute he had was with St. Augustine ; and but for the gentleness and forbearance of the holy Bishop, it must have led to a breach between them. He was also engaged in a long war against Origenism, involving a quarrel between himself and his old friend Rufinus, who would not condemn the eri'ors of Origen. We are sometimes repelled by faults of temper and other defects in St. Jerome's character ; while yet in his lifelong devotion to great objects, and especially that of giving to the Western Church the best possible version of the Bible, his character rises to true sublimity. But his life's work was comparatively little thought of in his own day. An armed band of Pelagian heretics attacked his monastery at Bethlehem; he escaped with difficulty, and remained in hiding over two years. He returned a.d. 418 ; but, broken in body and mind, gradually failed in both, and died September 30, a.d. 420. He was buried at Bethlehem, and his body is said to have been translated to Rome in the thirteenth century. He has always been esteemed as the most learned and eloquent of the Latin Fathers ; and his familiarity with Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, with ancient history and philosophy, and witli the manners and scenery of the East, were invaluable to him as a translator and an expositor of Holy Scripture. His one hundred and forty-seven extant and genuine epistles, his treatises and com- mentaries, and his translations, have indeed well earned for him his title of one of the four doctors of the Western Church. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Eeclus. xlvii. 8-11. St. Matt. v. 13-19.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — None. Represented — With red hat and robe, later as a cardinal ; with lion, ink-bottle, wallet and scroll, church, liOur-glass, skull, stone ; beating his breast with a stone, luiteling on thorns, or wearing a garment interwoven with thorn:. 1 66 Cf)c CalcnDac toitb r()e Cable of Lcssoivs. „■ . . .J .»- .r! i i o 6 >■•> •> ■> .1:5 x^x ■p •x 4^ .- > '? |:d:=.> .-^ j?:s':3 .i '0 -! .J .- .- § O 3 . ".s .- > '^'^li-d ••^^ ._• CO iH -< H X X X 3 •~3 t- ^ X X X X Xjg:= > > .2 XX X « c > «4 < S • .p^ ;3 .SXXXXXXX R_ s _. .fe >■■? .^;d . ..« 13 .S' >••>■ :s fi (N s > ? ? > .3 ;- >.2 K X X X „■ — • — • . := Z 43 .:3 • .- . 3 o i .2 X X 3 .«• . . :— j^^ « •3 ^^S.S^x^x xg :S >''i.i ■p^x X X x^.S > ■> x^x > 'x ci i 1' >■ §5 ^ vii. 1;. 24. viii. to V. 26. viii. V. 26. ix. to r. 28. ix. V. 28 to V. 51. ix. r. 51 tox. »\ 17. X. V. 17. xi. to V. 29. ._: .^ :3 >■- X - ,-• s 2^S V. 11. i. to V. 20. i. )'. 20. ii. to V. 31. _ ii. V. 31 to xix. s 55 ° ^ .S3.- x' x' 'x >>>>>> ^ > > > > X X >< X XXX X X X X X X X X X X X C Oi s ■* co.^ »L-5 s c .•t: m c: >• g S ■? 00 -._■ iv. Micah ii. iv. vi. Nahum i. iii. Habakkuk ii. Zephaniali i. t •^ 5; .^1 viii. to r. 14. ix. V. 9. .xi. xiii. Malachi i. iii. to V. 13. c: c 4i fi iH §3 5:0 « > 06 CO " -" ~:s -P c Sc5 2 IZ ■ " „• ■'^ 5^ » ^.:. . .■^ ^ ^ cc c 00 ■- .. 11 . rd := 5 & t :=.>.> > •P :S:s 12 .S-o .-•:=• ■= ;3Eh:3 iS.S > H:d:3E-i.„-:5 IN rH ;^ § :3 oi ■>* •*■ » a o & o I— 1 •^ . ^ J t; O O s D 1 1 06 -.„• .-a •-5 iii. Micah i. to u. iii. v. vii. Nahum ii. Habakkuk i. iii. N [to 11. iii. Haggai ii. to v Zeonariali i. t ':= >■ '> '> X •p ^x ^ :3 ^■? R > ? 1 i CO 1^ fa S ra '^ ?*-*. S h C • ? •a ss (4 m S a. o ^ 0. ;t d > 1 (3 09 .5 2 3 d s 0) ■S .^ 2 i^ ■c «i fc; fa 00 H H >« <« 1 s a d d 0000 d 2 b 1 3 'rf'rt "rt 13 T3 13 73 13 g 3 000 IC -^^ cc ooouou ei -^ 0; X I- 0000 U «oio ■* « .-. — . — 1 P^ < ^ o*^ •« iaw!^ o"^ *"" bO 1< ira?D t* 00 050 ?1 S (M IN CI CI t^oOOSO ,_ ^ — ^ -. — M CI CI (M « « Compatison of CalcnDar.s. 167 a - P4^0 rt Cu •- 'rr,:3 f5 T3 = m X X i-J S S .£; -*^ t- tn d S « ^ g « 3 J-> ;H .« -^ X xi^x X X p. 3 < 93 0) X fq O O O u 0) i-H O -p •iH n o O s fl) 2 n S ■c 1^ a 3 'Sb S 60 o X H o 3 c 2 »" ^ -i^ X -i^ xxxx m .2 . 3 -S S oj cow M 3 3 :73 -a BO H ■rt 3 1 . 5, +3 rt 11 't m ■a a < <4 « ■= ■^.' <80 u ^ ° g 3^ ■^, O H W lS -i^ xxxxxxxxx xf^ tA->, ■i^X XX 3 rtfS W r^ != C/J 0) c X OJ X f gM W 3 3 3-73 &- » £ S S.2 to r^ 3 3 SI 3 Tl CU 3 ?^5 (4 to m >. 6-^ . 3 '^ .0 *^ ea;:5 ft" 3 cS ■5 « iS 3 ~- « a ^g iC -(.3 aj . > w U &s OJ 00 o 'S .a'O rt >0 d 3 3 '5. 3 a t4 ©■ X X X X ^ ^i ^^X XX XX S .^ w +3 X 4J t/3 X X +> p^ 4i M H CO ^ X ^ X X! Q ^ a\ «T)< in totr- 00 « p-H (M cc •* 10 to t^ CO OS ^ (M CC ^ . g o -S 3 a g< B a M 2^ X X m cc . 3 2 « 2 i 3 « 2 fe c'SS^ ^ fe'^.rtPH -0^1.2 -3 yj s ion Con tus Transla ward St. Cali . H X i; 3 X -^ o 4iX o P>5 s O X U-. a ■s S" 1 5^ a ■a 3 3 3 a X OO" CO *i *>■ CO XX OM .2 OS b0.t> '? "^ . c_g io «t3 3 l>,2 X CO 73 a .2 ^ ^ ;3 a S .9 bO t3 a =■ C: .tiCO XX a H ca . .20- go a JiS s: S2 ^ OJ 3 a j: ^ iS 4^ 43 +3 'r^m'Xi 3 f-1 C3 O PS a o 'S-a 0(-5 a -*^ o a o ..2W X X S 03 3 u o o la C5 t3 a s -a a ea a o e X X X 'a -a § es o a c X i68 Cfje s^inor !t>oij>Daps of Dctobcr. 1] Remigius, Bishop of Rhemes. — This saint, often called St. Remi, "Apostle and Patron of France," was born about A.D. 439, of noble parents, long after their, other children, his birth having been foretold by one Wontanus, a hermit. He received a suitable education, and was remarkable for holiness of life, so that he was made Bishop of Rheims in the twenty-third year of his age, and afterwards Primate of Gaul, wlience Rlieims became tlie Metropolitical See of France. He is chiefly knonn as having baptized Clovis, or Hlodwig, the first orthodox Christian King of the Franks, with such solemnity that tlie convert asked, "Patron, is tliis the kingdom of God ?" At the font tlie holy bishop said, " Bend thy liead gently, Sicambrian, burn what thou hast worshipped, worship what thou hast burned. " Hence subsequent French kings were styled "Eldest Son of the Church" and "Most Christian King." Clovis had been, previous to embracing the Faith, under the influence of his Christian Queen Clothild, as Ethelbert of Kent had been under that of Queen Bertha ; and his conversion, as in the case of our own first Christian King, was speedily followed by that of great numbers of his subjects. [See Jlay 2Gth.] Remigius proved a help- ful counsellor to Clovis, and together they founded three French sees. He died a natural death, January 13, A. D. 533, having administered the Holy Eucharist to liis people but a few days before. His body was laid in the little Church of St. Christopher, in a place corresponding to the entrance to the choir of the present great basilica wliich bears his name, and which was consecrated by Pope Leo the Great October 2, A.D. 1049, the body of St. Eemi liaving been solemnly translated on the previous day, which thencefortli superseded January 13th as his festival. The legend of the sacred ampul of chrism brought down from heaven by a white dove for the baptism of Clovis, and used for the anointing of the French kings until it was destroyed at the Revolution, is not heard of till nearly four hundred years after the death of St. Remi. This venerable relic was publicly broken in 1793, but a particle of the glass and some of the chrism are believed to have been preserved, and are still shewn in the treasury at the Cathedi'al Church of Notre Dame in Rheims, together with a new ampul made in imitatiou of the old one. The body of the saint is still enshrined at the Church of St. Remi. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Heb. vii. 23-27. St. Luke xii. 35-40.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — Seven, unless any be to St. Re- migius of Lincoln. Represented — With the ampul, or a dove bringing it to him. 6] Faith, Virgin and Martyr. — The story of St. Faith, or Fides, is very like that of other early virgin martyrs. She was born of Christian parents, and while still very young brought to her trial. She suflfered under the cruel Datian [see January 22nd] in the latter part of the third century at Agen, in Aquitaiue. Refusing to sacrifice to Diana, she boldly confessed Christ notwitlistanding the most horrible tortures, endeavouring, as she said, to shew herself worlhy of her name. Having been beaten witli rods, and bound to a brazen bed over burning coals, she was at last beheaded. Several spec- tators, rebuking the tyrant, and refusing to sacrifice, suffered with her. The JLirtyrologies mention another St. Faith under .Tune 23rd as a martyr with her mother Sophia and lier sisters .Spes and Caritas. The three sisters were invoked in some York litanies. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. Ecclus. li. 9-12. St. Matt. xiii. 44-52.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Hereford, Aberdeen, and Paris. Dedications o/ Churches — Sixteen, and one with All Saints ; .•dso the crypt of old St. Paul's. Represented — The three sisters as children holding swords. 9] St. Denys, Areof.\gite, Bishop, and Martyii. — All we know from Scripture of Dionysius the Areopagite is that he was a certain man of Athens, converted by the preaching of St. Paul [Acts xvii. 34]. Eusebius makes him to have been first Bisliop of Athens, and according to a later tradition lie suffered martyrdom tliere. Tlie remarkable philosopliical works long supposed to liave been written by him arc now feuerally considered to be tlie productions of some Neo- 'latonists of tlie sixth century. His place in our Calendar is the result of what was a popular lichef for many centuries, that the Areopagite and St. l)enys of France were the same person, formerly Bishop of Athens, who liaving come to Rome was sent by St. Clement to preach in Gaul. This is the tradition of the Greek as well as of the Western Church, and was embodied in the Otiicca of the Medi-ioval Churches generally. According to this legend, St. Dionysius liad as companions in work and in martyrdom Rusticus, a presbyter, and EleutheriuR, a deacon. It first appears in the middle of the fifth century. According to another version, the Dionysius sent by Clement, or the successors of the Apostles, was not the Areopagite ; and according to Gregory of Tours, a. D. 570, he was sent to Paris under the consulship of Decius circa A.D. 253, and was slain with the sword, being Bishop of the Parisians circa A.D. 272, so that he was in that case a totally different jjerson. The Augsburg Missal of 1555, the Paris Breviary of 1836, and probably other service-books, adopt this last account ; while the present Roman Missal, Breviary, and Martyrology identify .St. Denys of France with the Areopagite, the Breviary also attributing to him the Celes- tial Hierarchy and other works referred to above. The Eastern Church commemorates the Areopagite on October 3rd, on which day the Roman Martyrology mentions a Dionysius and his companions, who are identified with the Areopagite and his companions by B»da and others dnwn to Alban Butler, who adopts the account which places SS. Denys, Lucian, Quintin, Crispin, and others with them, in the third century [see January 8tli], without any reference to the Breviary. St. Denys was one of the most popular saints of the Middle Ages, particularly in France, in which country lie was venerated as one of its greatest apostles. According to the "Acts," he was exposed to wild beasts at Paris, cast into a fiery furnace, crucified, and finally with Rusticus and Eleu- therius beheaded on the "Martyrs' Mount," Montniartre. The later story that St. Denys carried his head in his hands from Montniartre to the site of the Abbey of St. Denys doubt- less arose out of' symbolical representations originally in- tended to convey uotliing more tlian that he was beheaded. [Sar. Ejj. and Gosp. : Acts xvii. 10-34. St. Luke vi. 17-23.J Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — Forty-three. Represented — Headless, and carrying the bare or mitred head in his hand ; sometimes not decapitated, bare or mitred, but still carrying a head in his hand. 13] Transl.\tion of King Edward, Confessor. — Eadward, or Edward, called "The Confessor," was elected to the English throne A. d. 1042, and died a natural death, January 5, 1066. The popular reverence for him, which culminated in his being regarded as the patron saint of England, was a matter of gradual growth, and arose in a great measure out of the mass of legend that gathered around his true history. At the same time he must have shewn personal qualities which won the affection of his people while he lived, and were remembered with reverence after his death. This popular esteem is the more noteworthy when we reflect that there 'vas no one remarkable thing either in his life or in his death to account for it. Rather, in some respects, as, for example, in his strange love of hunting, he was not very saint-like. He was, however, devoted to religious exercises and to the founding of monas- teries and churches. The great Abbey Church of St. Peter at Westminster was through him completed, and solemnly dedicated on the Feast of the Holj' Innocents, A.D. 1065, but he was too sick to be present, and on the Eve of tlie Epiphany he died. On the following festival he was buried before the high altar in the new church, a gre.at concourse of nobles and ecclesiastics being present, William I. adorned his tomb with silver and gold, and Archbishop Becket removed his body to a richer shrine, October 13, A.D. 1163. After the rebuilding of the church by Henry III. a sumptuous shrine was constructed ; and the wreck of this, with later additions, still remains. The translation by St. Thomas is the one commemorated in the Calendar. The shrine was demolished by order of Heury VIII., and the body buried in the Abbey, but in 1557 it was replaced in the restored shrine with great pomp. The restoration of the festival of his former transla- tion to our Calendar in 1561 shews the vener.ation in which his memory continued to be held, a veneration which was scarcely extinct even in 1700, wlieii lying eulogists compared the devotion of George II. to that of St. Edward ! Touching for the " Idng's evil " arose out of the belief that St. Edward could cure disease by his toucli, and that the power remained with }us posterity. It was List performed by Queen Anne, and a speci.al Office for it is found in m.any Books of Common Prayer. The same power was attiilnitcd to the kings of France. A ring given by St. Edward in his last illness to the Abbot of Westminster was long preserved as a relic which could cure nervous diseases ; a legend being attached to it. Succeeding kings blessed "cramp-rings" on Good Friday. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. ; Ecclus. xxxix. 5-9. St. Luke xi. ,33-36.] [See General Appendix.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Ilerefor . J3 -S . iS — . . -S . s •"'r^^ iJ ;jH >>i.-:s -F^ t" > tf ■-■ -C I* .^ :3 i* .--T ei 'A > C4 6 .PH • « 'l-l -S-f^w- d 3 K X X X X X X —•>■■? 'S X X X X x_-;3;a^« xxxxx>?xxxx^ 1 3.« CD J X X X X 13 := «■" . -g s — • . :a .K'x'R s P4 X X X X X > s S:a > > I .a Li M X x x x 'x ^ ■•-■-; ..-tsiH J . is'.fe >•■?■?■? .2x-x'| X X X 2 M J M X X X X X ;s :3 .:; ^ !» > f- .S X X X X X X X X X 1 1 .^ .:=.&■== . . :3 ^- • J X .2'x'x X x'x .:3 kt'-s x" X X X X X x;3;3^.i;q C3 ■^-i J X X X X H t-i X X X X xxxxxxxxxxx "m > X X »-H ^ (5 > zr ^" o . uS ■■l-x- •<* IM '^ C-. X _■ ^ .^^S"- CO ..■ oi — 1 _^ oi o t-i o 1 01 0) CO 10 ij 0) in 2 - 01 .CO 3 ?" . ri ^ ■ . ..-• '^ .,• . „ 4J ^ X X X X X X X X X X x-§.j:al3l2.£.i >■ >•? •>•? ■>-?->-s.><.2 x' 'x 'x s t-1 1-5 »o •* 0; ~i 00- 0) — w . '^ o XlN ?. ;-• ~ ;-" <^ » -• •4^ ?> .o3^2£2 . .S ^ s S • M .M •.-> -^ 'f-i « X X •<-■ +3 3 rt >>.XKMMx;:3E'3 •« o" 02 CO r-i P ^ 1 X 2 :;- ^ »i H f^HH t^Tf* ^00 «• o o o -M -JS -*^ .« CN ^ ' 2. is o:a ^ X xxxxxxxxx;at3 g:= XXX C •p. 1 ^ >2f 5'S to •is S 11 § « d i .s " ti 1 ° ^H j3 P9 o 1 a .o <« W bo 3 ,- •« 1 to o n. •js *s ii - .2 *^ ja rt 2 3 - S •= -2 -gj a 3 t. 3 QJ 81 s S M 1 W § c3^ W ^ 8 . a 0^ i ^133 • . . . 'C "rt e« rt rt rt S3 <365c3c3(3 "rt 13 "rt <5 oooo CO CMlZlco.^ »«-,-co&:32i^222: cow l-H f-l ^o o>cc t^te inTj-cOjJ; »^ 0) M-l !M)i -W 4i J3 £ m m ^j -iJ 43 cc cc CBHtK mm M ;/: cc m M (ti m m M Oi 00 05 "^ 'p< A § S F? § ?„ i s 1 1 S > -a >> ^ 3 f J & Ph it t CO 3 CO pq 1^ a) S ■a s ■^ 2 "0 g g "^ Hi 1) ° - s Ills s 2^.E "2 o< 3 ° a .2 2 M aii u Si "o a 11 il It 13 m a « s ° 1 ■fl 'a i > Sir} 0) .2'^.SS 1^ rt ^ra 2 ^1 OH -a a .2 « 3 .1 1 S H ■d Ph 5 83i-g e« a> b< 2 1 ^ !^ 4iai j3 .SCO y} ^■*i« 4i4J 4i ?» M « t-i -*i .w a: -> a; t- OOO a! a s »• rt g m 3 a 3 a <3 B ^^x ■*^ jS ^ .*j .*a .*j +a 4^ 4^ .^j +3 -t>cc jJ Hi*; 43 n rxj H cccc oj «3 ODOD OJ a: mmmi mm CG !» ^ CD t3 t CI 1 CS 2 •1 1 S3 S tJ g 3 TO 1 m mod!*- . & ■S 2 ,2 1 2 1 1 §1§ 11 "m 3 3 b .sir 000 6 a li H a 3 .s '2 3 cc H 02 tK a3!»P a?cw Oi m mmm mm a; m -2 •a s a re < c5 u 1 all " a3 b a>^ ja 000 H^ .»i 4i mmm 'I 1 0! < m 172 Cije ^inor ii)olpDap5 of JSooemfaer. I] All Saints' Day. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — Eleven hundred and forty-eight, also twenty-four with St. Mary, and eleven to other saints with All Saints. 5] See "State Services." 6] Leonard, Confessor. — This saint was born of noble Frankish parents in the court of Clovis, wlio stood sponsor for him at the font to do honour to his father. Having become a disciple of St. Reniigius [Octobei' 1st], he resolved to embrace the religious life, notwithstanding the earnest dissuasion of the King. After remaining some time in the Monastery of Micy, near Orleans, he retired to a hermitage in a forest near Limoges, converting many on his way. He was not allowed to remain here alone, for many flocked to liim, and a monastery arose on the spot, which was endowed by a successor of Clovis with as much of the forest as Leonard could ride round in a night on liis ass. Here Leonard ruled at the head of a flourishing commuuitj' till his death, about A.D. 559. He is said to have taken great interest in prisoners, and to have obtained leave from Clovis to release many ; hence he is regarded as the patron of prisoners. He is also reputed to have been a deacon. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. ; Ecclus. xxxix. 5-9. St. Luke xi. 33-36.] Calendars — All except Roman and Paris. Dedications of Churches — About one hundred and flfty, one ■\vith St. John, and one with St. Mary. Represented — As a monk or abbot, with chains, fetters, etc. II] St. Martin, Bishop and Confessor. — This famous saint was born early in the fourth century at Sabaria, in Pannonia [Hungary], but brought up at Pavia. Botli liis parents were Pagans, but Martin at ten years old used to frequent the Christian churclies and ask to be made a catechumen. His father, a military tribune, enrolled him in the army at fifteen, and lie remained in this condition of life nearly three years before his baptism, free from the common vices of soldiers, and full of good works. Once in winter he met a poor man begging outside the gate of Amiens, and see- ing him barely clad, cut oft' half of his own military cloak with his sword, aud gave it to the beggar. The next night he saw a vision of Jesus clad in the same portion of his cloak, saying to angels standing by, ' ' Martin, yet a catechumen, hath covered Me with tliis garment. " \^'llen he had been baptized, and had served in the army about five years, he sought liis discharge, saying, " I am Christ's soldier ;" but being taunted with cowardice, he offered to stand before the line unarmed, and to march into the ranks of the enemy in the Name of the Lord Jesus and protected by the sign of the Cross. Tlie next day the enemy sued for peace and surrendered, whereupon Martin got liis discharge. On leaving the army, he sojourned with Hilary of Poictiers [January 13th], who ordained him exorcist ; but being warned in a dream, he went to visit his parents, and converted his mother to the Faith. Here lie was publicly flogged by Arian heretics, and had to retire to an island, where he lived on roots ; here he took hellebore by mistake, and narrowly escaped being poisoned. On St. Hilary's return from exile [January 13th], Martin followed him to Gaul, and established a monastery near Poictiers. In A.D. 371 he was much sought after to be first Bishop of Tours. The neiglibouring Bishops objected, but had to give way to the voice of the people. Martin lived as a monastic Bishop in a secluded spot two miles from Tours, with eighty dis- ciples, who were cave-dwellers, while he himself lived in a wooden hut. As Bishop lie shewed great zeal in demolishing temples and trees consecrated to Pagan worsliip ; and, like St. Boniface [Juue 5th], he cut down a sacred tree in order to satisfy the rustics as to the truth of his religion. He also boldly rebuked and withstood the usurping Emperor Maximus, who condemned to death the heretic Priscillian and his imme- diate followers on the ground that it was a new and unheard-of iniquity for a secular judge to decide an ecclesiastical cause. During the last sixteen years of liis life lie lived in close retire- ment, where he had many supernatural visions ; and on November 9, A.D. 401, he died .at Candes, near Tours. On November 11th he was liuried in a cemetery just outside Tours as it then was, and eleven years afterwards St. Bricc, bis .successor, built a cliapel over the tomb. [See July 4th.] St. Martin's cope [cappa] used to be carried into battle and kept in a tent where Mass was said, hence the term capella. cliapel. In time a blue banner, divided to represent St. Martin's cloak, was carried instead, until it was superseded by the famous OW- flamme, the banner of St. Denys. [.Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xUv. 17, 20, 21-23 ; xlv. 6, 7, 15, 16. St. Matt. xxv. 14-23 ] Calendars — All. Dcdicalioiin of Churches— One hundred and sixty. Represented — On horseback, dividing his cloak for the beggar ; as a Bishop ; a Martinmas goose by his side. 13] Britius, Bishop.— St. Britius, or Brice, was brought up in St. Martin's Monastery near Tours, and was ordained deacon and priest by St. Martin. He had given much trouble by his disorderly conduct while young, aud even after his ordination .St. JIartin had a mind to depose him ; but he said, " If Christ endured Judas, wliy not I Brice?" and pre- dicted that Brice would succeed him in the Bishopric, which came to pass. Even when he had become a Bishop grave charges were brought against him, and he either fled from Tours or was deposed for many years. The Sarum Breviary contaius the legend that on his being accused of being the father of an infant, he adjured it by Clirist to say if be were its father, and it replied, "Thou art not my father." And when the people ascribed this to magic he took burning coals in his birrus to St. Martin's tomb, saying, " As this vestment is unhurt by the fire, so is my body unpolluted." But the people of Tours would not believe him, and drove him from the Bishopric. He then went to Rome and related all to the Pope, was acquitted of tlie gravest charges, and returned to his see in the seventli year armed with Papal authority. In liis latter d.ays he acquired the reputation of a saint, and dying a.d. 444, was buried near St. Martin in the chapel hi- had himself built. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Wisd. x. 10-14. St. Luke xix. 12-28.] [July 4th, October 11th.] Calendars — All except Roman and Monastic. Dedications of Churches — One in England, viz. Brize Norton, and that of Llanverres in North Wales. Represented — Carrying burniug coals in his vestment ; an infant on tlie ground near him. 15] Machi-tus, Bishop.— Maelog, Malo, Mawes, Maclon. ilaclovius, or Machutus, was a native of Wales, but trained in a monastery at Aleth [now .St. Malo], in Brittany, under St. Brendan, from wliom, when he grew up, he received the habit. Afterwards he became Bishop of Aleth, and converted the neiglibouring islet of Aaron into a monastery. But the opposition of the local chiefs obliged him to leave his see, and he went to .Saintes, where Leontius, tlie Bishop, gave him a cell at Brie, and liere he remained till recalled to Aleth. Soon he had to flee again, and this time he settled with some monks from Brittany at Archambray, where he died Novem- ber 15, A.D. 564, His relics were acquired by the Church of Aleth in the seventh century in a discreditable manner, and in A.D. 975 were taken to Paris, where they were lost at the Revolution. Many wonderful legends were related of him. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xliv. 17, 20-23 ; xlv. 6, 7, 15, 16. St. Luke xix. 12-28.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Hereford, Aberdeen. Dedications of Churches — St. Mawes, in Cornwall. Represented — As a Bishop. 17] Hugh, Bishop op Lincoln. — Hugh of Avalon, or de Grenoble, was born of a noble Burgundian family, a.d. 1140. His mother died when lie was eight years old ; and his father then entering a monastery of regular canons near his castle, dedicated tlie child Hugh in the same place, committing him to the care of an aged brother of the house, who instructed him in sacred and secular learning. Having been ordained deacon at the age of nineteen, he resolved to join the then new order of Carthusiaus, one of the reformed Benedictine orders. His brother canons having in vain tried to keep him back, he escaped, and was admitted into the Grande Char- treuse, the first house of the order. In process of time he was ordained priest, made procurator of tlie monastery, and sent to England to govern the first Carthusian house in this country, which had been founded A.D. 1181 by Henry II. at Witham, in Somerset, but unsuccessfully managed by two previous priors. Under the care of Hugli the monastery became very prosi)crous. "The King, who for the opinion he had of his holinesse, vsed often," says Godwin, " priuately to conferre with liim, remembering how great wrong ho had done the Church of Lincolne in so long keeping it without a Bishop, determined to make amends by giuing them "a good one at last, and jirocured this Hugh before he vnderstood of any such thing toward, to be elected Bishop of that see. He gouerned very stoutly and with great seuerity, yet so, as he was more reuerenced and loued then feared. His excom- munications were very terrible vnto all men, and the rather, for tliat it was noted, as I find deliuercd, some notable calamity otherwise did lightly follow them. His Cliui-oh of Lincolne he caused to be all new built from the found.ation, a great and memorable worke, and not possible to be ])ei-fornicd by him without infinite liclpe." Indeed, as lias been well K.aid by another, "a more zealous and indofatigablo prelnf'- Cfje ^inor I^olpDaps of Bowmbcx. 173 than was Bishop Hugh of Lincoln seldom, if ever, presided over a sec of our own or any other Christian land." He yearly visited Withani for devout retirement, living as a brother, with no mark of distinction but the Bishop's ring. He was overtaken by his last sickness on his way back from one of these sojininiiugs, and died in London, November 17, A. D. 11200, as they were singing in his hearing the Nioir illmiUis in the Office of Compline. He was solemnly buried in Lincoln Minster, the journey from London having taken six days. King John of England and King William of Scotland met at Lincoln and helped to carry the bier, three archbishops and nine bishops being also present, with a multitude of abbots and priors. Eighty years afterwards his body was solemnly deposited within its golden shrine in the "angel choir" behind the high altar, Edward I. ami his Queen, the Arch- bishops of Canterbury and Edessa, many bishops, and two hundred and thirty knights being present. St. Hugh was one of the most popular English saints, and the day of tlie accession of Queen Elizabeth [November 17th] was commonly called " St. Hutrh's Day." [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xlv. 1-5. St. Mark^xiii. 33-37.] Calendars— Harnm, Aberdeen. Dedications of C/uirches — Quethiock, in Cornwall, unless it be to some local saint. Represented — Witli a tame swan which he had ; holding three flowers. 20] Edmund, Kino and Martyr. — This Eadmund, or Edmund, the last of the native under-kings of East Auglia, was placed on the throne at the age of fifteen years, in 855 ; and when the Danes invaded that province in 870, he fought against them, but was beaten and taken prisoner. They then offered him his life and his kingdom if he would for- sake Christianity and reign under them. When he refused, they tied him to a tree and shot him with many arrows, and at last cut off his head, which they flung into a' thicket. The following year, when the Danes had retired, the body was recovered, and tlie head found among the brambles, guarded, it was said, by a great grey wolf. Over his relics rose the famous Abbey of Bury St. Edmunds ; and no figure was more common in the painted glass and on the rood-screens of East Anglia than that of this martyred King. He could scarcely have died the death of a martyr unless his life had been that of a confessor for Christ ; and what we are told is that though he was very young, he was distinguished as a model prince by his religion and piety, his restoration of ruined churches, his good government, and his determined hostility to everything mean and bad. He was never married, and, like many monks and other devout persons, he learned the psalter by heart, and the book which he was said to have used was shewn at Bury. His name is connected with much that is legendary, and the Sarum Breviary lias a grotesque account of the finding of the head, etc. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. ; Ecclus. xxxi. 8-11. St. Luke xiv. 26-33.] Calendars — Sarum, York, Hereford. Dedications of Churches — Fifty-five (fifteen being in East Anglia), unless any be to St. Edmund the Archbishop. Represented — Crowned and pierced by many arrows ; bound to a tree as above ; a wolf guarding his body or crowned head; an arrow in his hand. 22] Cecilia, Virgin and Martyr. — Ctecilia, a Roman lady, was venerated as a virgin martyr at a very early period, and the martyrdom of her and of her three companions is referred to in the Martyrology attributed to St. Jerome, and in the earliest Missals and Breviaries. Yet it is very difficult to find her true date and place, so conflicting are the accounts. According to the earliest, she suffered in Sicily A. D. 176-180; according to another, in Rome a.d. 230; while the Greek Menologies say at Rome, in the time of Diocletian, a.d. 284- 305. Nor have we any authentic accounts of her life and history. There was a church dedicated to her at Rome, where Pope Paschal I. placed her supposed body, removed from the Catacombs, in 821, and provided that the praises of God should be sung around her tomb day and night. Hence probably arose the legends that connect her name with sacred music, there being nothing of the kind in the earliest accounts of her. One circumstance related in the legendary ' ' Acts " is that by her prayers she brought an angel down to convince her newly-married husband that she ought to lead a life of perpetual virginity. The Acts of St. Cecilia, though not genuine, have been remarkably confirmed as to substance by discoveries in the Catacombs, including that of her original tomb, probably, in a cemetery with many epitaphs of mem- bers of the Ca?cili.an family. [vSar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. li. 9-12. St. Matt. xiii. 44-.')2. ] Her name occurs in the A'obls nuoqne in the Canon of the Mass. Calendars — All. Dedications of Clmrches — Two. Represented — Crowned ; bearing wreaths of roses or other flowers ; a palm ; a sword ; an almond branch ; a sprig of flowers ; in later representations slio is holding a portable organ or harp, or playing on an organ. 23] St. CleiMent I., Bishop or Rome and Martyr. — Ac- cording to common tradition, the "fellow-labourer" men- tioned by St. Paul [Phil. iv. 3] as having his name written in the Book of Life, is to be identified with the third of the Bishops of Rome, whose name is mentioned in the Communi- canles in the Canon of the Mass. But so mucli legend has grown up around tlie name of Clement, and so little trustworthy in- formation has come down to us, that we hardly know anytliing about him. From Rome the Roman Clement wrote his "First Epistle " to the Corinthians on the occasion of a schism towards the end of the first century, and is hence regarded as one of the "Apostolical Fathers." The second epistle ascribed to him is rather a homily, and must have been written at least a generation later than his time. Other epistles, and a mass of "Clementine literature," undoubtedly spurious, have been attributed to him. An account of his martyrdom, probably no earlier than the ninth century, tells how he was banished to the Crimea ; and having converted the whole district by his miracles, was by Trajan's order cast into the sea with an anchor round his neck, an event pictured in frescoes of the tenth or eleventh century in the Church of St. Clement at Rome. So, too, the Sarum and Roman Breviaries. But no writer wlio speaks of the Bishop Clement describes him as a martyr until we come to Rufinus and Zosimus, about A.D. 400, and they do not mention the anchor story. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Phil. iv. 1-3. St. Luke xix. 12-28.] Calendars — All except the Parisian. Dedications of Churches — Forty -seven, and one with St. Mary. Represented — As Bishop or Pope, with double or triple cross; an anchor in his hand, to his neck, or at his feet; leaning on an anchor ; a fountain springing up by him. 25] Catharine, Virgin and Martyr. — It would be hard to find a saint more generally reverenced than St. Catharine, or one of whom so little is really known, not one single fact related about her being reasonably certain. She has usually been identified with a nameless lady of Alexandria, of whom Eusebius [H. E. viii. 14] says that when she resisted the unhallowed advances of the Emperor Maximiuus he punished her with banishment and deprivation of goods. With refer- ence to the once popular legends of St. Catharine, Baronius himself says that silence is better than falsehood mixed with truth. The Sarum Breviary contains many more marvels than does the modern Roman, but the Parisian of 183G con- tains none. In the Sarum and Roman Breviaries we are told that Catharine combined the study of the liberal arts with fervent faith, and prevailed in argument over the most learned philosophers, kindling in them the love of Christ so that they were content to die for His sake. Then Maximin caused her to be scourged and bruised with leaded whips and kept in prison for eleven days without food. Next she was put on a wheel with sharp blades, but at her prayers the wheel was broken, and then she was beheaded on the 25th of November. Her body was marvellously borne by angels to Mount Sinai, in Arabia. The Sarum Breviary tells of a river of oil that was seen to flow from her tomb, etc. The angels are now explained by Alban Butler and otlier Roman Catholic writers to have been monks. Her extraordinary popularity in France and England d.ates from the bringing of alleged relics of her from Jlount Sinai to Rouen by one Simeon, a monk, who died a.d. 1035. She is accounted the patron of secular, as St. Jerome is of theological learn- ing. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. li. 1-8. St. Matt. xiii. 44-52.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — Fifty-one. Represented — With a wheel or wheels, often spiked ; with a sword, a book, a lamb, or a palm ; carried by angels to Mount Sinai. 30] St. Andrew, Apostle and Martyr.— [^ce notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — Nearly six hundred, and three with other Saints. Represented — With .t cross saltire, or sometimes an ordinary cross in his hand. 174 €\)C CalenDar \uitb tbe Cable of ile.s.son0 1 ^ .„• .« ^ .-J . . tf S^ > -»i ■S -S-S . >- ^ > .2 X ■x'S 'U :-=i>^ .^ :=i >^:=;5^:=;F;i >^:: 'H (Si o « _• . .:= «' Z ;-! .^ . .^' >■> x X X ;-: .^ £"■>■> ^- .'•- •=.£ (0 CO E^ IJ S.2 S K H M X X X X X X X X K t< « X ^■ y. y. X. ys X "x 'xx'x-.-aa i.>^ ^i2 ^ rH o o o P d .« ■Sc^ . .-; *s < >- iSi >• "?'? .£2 X ^ P K 'x >>>^.2M>:Xt^X XXX XXXXXMX;-!XX XKX X X S > 'x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X o I 'x X X X ■>.2 X X X X "x 'x'x'x'>3u3— — — — Ji — > X ■So od oo g" ■^ Si 5^ . CO 05 1 ^.■^ V- -S s 5:S o .- » c. -t^ - o .. s o 2 -S^ -^' CD ,3 o 1-5 .*^ > !> > •?•>•> .2 .2 X X 'x >■ .-; . :s . :d > '> .2 'x X ><>^ XXX xxx X si lo '^.-: >oo Sod 02 >> iH > J CI X X x'x X X x^ ;^ ;^ ;^ X s CI s >" «=5-^ - a I> ^ J-! X X X X X X X X X X X ft •iH CO 2 •-I 3ri t-^ t-^ :s 5D X . rd ia nj 5 1 S o o . :2 is :« .^ > o 3 .„■ " ■« |^'^-^(;.„- :l„-i •>■.«■ X '^3'5:s.S!> >xx xxx in si 'x X Ph 5 ^H ?> .— C) cc^f^ pq M "* :d =» 13 O o 5^ O GO o x"x 3 CI CO "r « CO > _x XXX X X X X 'x'x'x^-;d';3 ^^;3 iS^ XXX X X X X X X X X X X c3 >> .s >> 4^ u -1^ • .s 13 § ^1 1 o s S" € ii 3 o 2 5s 1 to „ ■i^ o .3 .2 S ® S*^^ s 1 t s > 1 i Itil u y: • ^ . . c 6» O «^ ^^»«t§ ;zi u 3 03 i 1-5 1 . . c p a = "rt a §3 hH 1— t S2S". s o ooQOuoooooooacjoo O -t foftn L-J ■*■ m Ch HH 05 CO t^ ^ »ri 'J' cc c i — o oi CO 1^ CO »o --jl w „^ o 1— ( P-l — '.t -^ J OT3 ©«*-. WKjrO o-d 0) HH WMj ^ O 13 « *w bo -P ft o O (1> QJ O - £ S-^ ^ t^ a> oj ■S-^-5.5 +^ 3 rt s^ gpQ S-S rt J5 " o) '^ 4J "o-Q II ccco O S ° ^ s Pa J3 -^ J^ aj -3 ^ -*^ .r: . *^ tjoa— -'^ «(. r/j -J3 02 W Q o 1 " o MO g 'c >, a . o a ■ ■*^ oj « ^-< rt G ^3 ■go oj <5 o •i5 kJ J^ -*^ o " ,2 !/3 i^ CC 'X CI P5 m 3 60 > g> rt p O H . £ X ►, >. (ZixxH 3 I rt u IH P« •E > ^ 2 T3 g 3 J3 Q XJ 53 r Lord, roto-nia ngelist. ts. 3 < 1 :si wo J 4i S a in g a 5 4J 4^ 1 +3 Nativity of 01 St. Stephen, P St. John, Eva Holy Innocen 3 il V i 4i w XM !C M W2 M X X rHC^W^ W^Ot^OO 050MC-lCO-<* m M-i o . a t " a a-Eb O X g J 6 13 •^ -*^ hr - ■^ a'W o o g o >>-a a S 4?&S a •.Bx*^.2> <5 h £6 ^ 73 a M "o .Is US ".a g Sb o X o 'TIS 2 4:> ii a M t- S a s ScC S a "« a W " o 53 o •.ex^,S> Kxxm ,0 .a o . la EO 3 t; -M s ;J3 ^ a, Q § i . > 3 1 i s .a !3 g ivity of Stephen John, E ocents. > 4i 4^ ■M -tJ X X X Oi iX 176 Cf)C ^inor !t)olptiaps of OecemtJcr. 6] Nicolas, Bishop of Mtea, in Ltcia. — The great fame of St. Nicolas, like that of St. Catharine, is founded on a vast mass of picturesque legend rather than on anything ve now really know about him. The earliest accounts of him which we have were written about five hundred years after his death, if, as is stated, it is to be placed a.d. 342. But the great venera- tion in which he was undoubtedly held in the Greek and Latin Churches in early times points to something extraordinary in his life and character. The Liturgy of St. Chrysostom con- tains a prayer in which his name is mentioned with that of other famous Eastern Saints, shewing in what honour he has long been held in the East, and he is still venerated in Russia next after the Holy Mother of God. Justinian built a church in his honour at Constantinople about a.d. 430, indeed he was titular saint of four churches there. The most remarkable legends concerning him are that when a new-born babe he stood up for two hours in an ecstasy, and on Wednesdays and Fridays refused to suck. Being left as a young man with a considerable fortune, he flung a bag of gold successively to each of three daughters, that they might marry honourably. When ordained priest he sailed for the Holy Land, and averted ship^vreck by his prayers in a storm. About a.d. 325 he was elected Bishop of Myra, and by the sign of the Cross restored to health a burned child. He is traditionally reported to have been present at the great Council of Nic«a, and is so represented in Eastern pictures of the Council. Here losing all patience with Arius, he dealt a violent blow at the jaw of that heretic, for which he had to undergo tem- porary deprivation and imprisonment. He is said to have obtained from the governor of Myra the release of three men imprisoned in a tower, the picture of which may have given rise to that of three children in a tub. The legend of his raising these children to life may be thus accounted for. He was much invoked by sailors, and accounted the patron of children. His tomb at Myra was much resorted to for a miraculous oil which flowed from it. In A.D. 10S7 some merchants of Bari in southern Italy carried off the relics to their own city. The " Boy -bishop" pageants of the middle ages began on St. Nicolas' Day, and lasted till Childermas or Holy Innocents' Day. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xliv. 17-23 ; xlv. 6, 7. 15, 16. St. Matt. xxv. 14-23.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — Three hundred and seventy-two, and seven with St. Mary, one with St. Swithun. Represented — With three children in a tub, or kneeling before him ; with three golden balls in various ways, some- times on a book with three loaves ; with an anchor, or a ship in the background. 8] CoN'CEPTiox OF THE Ble.s.sedViegin M.iP.Y. — The obser- vation of this festival began in the East in early times, but did not become general in the West till the fifteenth century. As the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception became more developed in the Roman Communion, the festival was from time to time elevated in rank. The term "Immaculate," liowever, was not used in the Missal or Breviary till 1854, when Pius IX. made the doctrine of the " Immaculate Con- ception" an article of faith. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Ecclus. xxiv. 17-22. St. Matt. i. 1-16.] Calendars — All. 13] LccT, Virgin and M.iktye. — We know nothing of St. Lucy, as the sole authority for her story is her fabulous "Acts," a Christian romance similar to the "Acts" of some other virgin martyrs, though probably based on facts. She was highly honoured at Rome in the sixth century, as appears from the Sacramentary of St. Gregory, and her name occurs in the Nobis qnoi/ne of the Mass. St. Aldhelm wrote much about her, not only in prose, but in his poem De lande Virginitatix. The legendary account of her is that she was the daughter of a Christian lady in Syracuse, named Eutychia, and born in the latter part of the third century. Being asked in marriage by a young nobleman of Syracuse who was a Pagan, she declined his suit, having fully resolved to con- secrate her virginity to God. Her mother was not aware of tliis, and wished her to marry the youth ; but being restored from dangerous sickness after the prayers of her daughter at the tomb of St. Agatha at Catania [February 5th], she no longer advocated the marriage. Lucy then sold all lier goods to feed the poor, and openly professed her dedication to Christ. Her former lover now nated her, and accused her to the Governor Paschasius in the Diocletian persecution. Boldly confessing Christ, she was condemned to infamy worse than death, but was delivered miraculously. Then they tried to burn her with the aid of pitch, oil, and fagots, but this attempt also failed. At last Iier throat was cut with a sword, and she died A.D. 30.3, predicting the peace of the Church, and announcing that Syracuse as well as Catania should have a virgin martyr. St. Lucy's Day regulates the Ember Days in December. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. li. !^- 12. St. Matt. xiii. 44-52.] Calendars — All. Dedications of Churches — Two. Represented — With eyes in a dish, or on a book ; holding a dagger, pincers, or lamp ; with a sword through her neck ; in a caldron over a fire ; oxen unable to drag her along ; tor- mented by devils. 16] S.\PiENTiA. — The first of the seven antiphons of the Magnificat sir.-.g in preparation for Christmas. [See notes on Fourtli Suudiiy in Advent.] The others were, on the 17th, Adonai; 18th, O Radix Jesse; 19th, O Ola vis David; 20th, Oriens; 22nd, Rex Gentium; 23rd, O Emmanuel (St. Thomas's Daj' having its own antiphon, Tlioma Didyme). These titles of Christ were sometimes called the " Seven Names." It has been maintained, with "much ingenuity," and more ignorance, that "0 Sapientia" was a saint, one of tlie eleven thousand virgins alleged to have suflered with St. Ursula. [Brady's Claris Calcndaria, ii. 323.] 21] St. Thomas, Apostle and Maettk. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Ch^irches. — Forty-five. Represented — With a carpenter's square ; with a spear or arrow. The square is associated with a legend of St. Thomas building a palace for an Eastern king. 25] Christmas Day. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Represented — The Nativity is pictured as having taken place in a stable ; the ox and ass are invariably introduced [Isa. i. 3], also the ".Star of Bethlehem" [St. Matt. ii. 9]. 26] St. Stephen, the First iLARXYTi. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and CoU.] Dedication's of Churches — Forty, and one with St. Mary. Represented — As a deacon, holding one or more stones in various ways. 27] St. John, Apostle and Evangelist. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — About two hundred and forty. Represented — With a cup, out of which issue one or more serpents ; with a palm branch ; writing ; as Evangelist, with an eagle ; sometimes it holds his inkhorn in its beak as he writes. 28] Innocents' Day. — [See notes on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.] Dedications of Churches — Four. Represented — Being slain by Herod's executioners with swords or daggers, Herod seated in a throne looking on. 31] Silvester, Bishop of Rome. — Silvester succeeded Melchiades as Bishop of Rome, January 31, a.d. 314. Con- stantine having defeated JIaxentius two years before, and so gained political ascendancy for the Church. At his exhorta- tion Constantine built many basilicas, and ornamented them in a splendid manner. The Roman Martyrology and Bre\nary say tliat Silvester baptized Constantine, whicli is an historical error not found in the Parisian or in the Sarum Breviary ; the latter, however, does contain a curious legend of the Pagans making Silvester descend into a dragon's den in the Tarpeian rock, where St. Peter and other saints appeared to him, and he delivered Rome from the malignity of the dragon. There is no doubt that Silvester issued several regulations with regard to ritual, etc., but the famous "Donation of Constantine," which pretended to give the temporal sove- reignty to Silvester and liis successors, is well known to be a gross forgery of the eighth century. Silvester died December 31, A.D. 335, and was buried in the cemetery of Priscilla on tlie Salarian Way, whence his body was removed to a church dedicated to him in tlie seventh century. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp.: Ecclus. 1. 1, 4, 5-12, 15, 21-23. St. Matt. xxv. 14-23.] Calendars— All Dedications of Churches — One, that of Cbevelstone, Devon. Represented — As a Pope, baptizing Constantine ; an ox by his side, referring to a story of liis bringing to life an ox that had been killed by magic. AN INTRODUCTION MORNING AND EVENING- PPxAYER. The ordinary daily Offices of the Christian C'hurcli were de- rived from the Jewish economy ; the celebration of the Holy Eucharist being the distinctive devotional characteristic of Christianity. As David sang, ''Seven times a day do I praise Thee" [Ps. cxix. 104]; and as Daniel "kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his Ood" [Dan. vi. 10], so down to that period during which the old and the new economy overlapped each other, a con- stant habit of praise and prayer in comiection with the morn- ing and evening sacrifice, and at other hours of the day, was maintained in the Temple at Jerusalem, and in the Syna- gogues elsewhere. The Apostles continued the practice of devout Jews, and are spoken of in the book of their Acts as being in the Temple at the hour of prayer, or as oflering their prayers elsewhere at tlie same hour. It was while "they were all with one accord in one place " at " th§ third hour of the day " [Acts ii. 1, 15] that the Holy Ghost descended upon them : " Peter went up upon the house-top to pray about the sixth hour" [Ibid. x. 9] : "Peter and John went up together into the temple at the hour of prayer, being the ninth hour" [Ibid. iii. 1]: " at midnight Paul and Silas prayed and sang praises unto God " [Jbid. xvi. 25] : and in the early zeal of their first love all the believers "continued stedfastly . . . in the prayers " [rars Trpoaevxa'!] " daily with one accord in the temple " [Ibid. ii. 4'2, 46], as a regular part of the system of that fellowship into which they had been baptized. Wlien the habits of the Church began to be settled, it appears that the opening and the close of each day were .appointed as the principal Iiours of prayer ; and tliat the three intermediate times, the third, sixth, and ninth hours, were still recognized, and marked by public worship. Ter- tullian, after giving the Scriptural examples cited above, goes on to say that though these "stand simply without any precept for their observance, yet let it be thought good to establish any sort of presumption which may both render more strict the admonition to pray, and, as it were by a law, force us away sometimes from our business to this service, (even as was the custom of Daniel also, according no doubt to the rule of Israel,) that so we should pray at least not seldomer than three times a day, we who are debtors to the Three, the Father, and the Sou, and the Holy CThost, exclusive, that is, of the reijular prayers whieh are due, without any ad- monition, at the beginnimj of day and night." [Tert. de Orat. ix. 26.] In his treatise on fasting he also calls the third, sixth, and ninth hours "Apostolic hours of prayer." St. Cyprian refers to the habits of Old Testament saints, and draws the r.ational conclusion that the events of the Gospel gave proof that there was a "sacrament," or mystery, in the ancient practice of righteous men offering prayers at these seasons, as if the spiritual instincts of good men were already moving in the light of the Cross. "But to us, dearest brethren," he says, "besides the hours of ancient time observed, both seasons and sacraments of prayer are increased in number. In the morning we must pray," not waiting, that is, for the third hour, "that the Kesurrection of the Lord may be commemorated with an early worship. This of old the Holy Spirit set forth in the Psalms, saying, ' My King and my Oiod, unto Thee will I cry : my voice shalt Thou hear in the morning ; in the morning will I stand before Thee, and will look up.' [Ps. v. 2.] And again, by the prophet the Lord saith, ' Early in the morning shall they seek Me, saying, Come and let us return unto tlie Lord our God.' [Hosea vi. 1] At sunsetting likewise, and the close of day, needful is it that we should again pray. For as Christ is the true Sun and the true Day, when at the going down of this world's sun and light we make prayer and peti- tion that the day may again return unto us, we are petition- ing for that commg of Christ, which will give to us the grace of the Light eternal." [Cypkian, de Orat. Dom. xxii.] In the Apostolical Constitutions the same habit of the Church is referred to in very lUstinct terms : "Ye shall make prayers. ... In the morning giving thanks, because the Lord hath enlightened you, removing the night, and bringing the day : at the third hour, because the i.tird at that time received sentence from Pilate ; at the sixth hour, because in it He was crucified ; at the ninth honr, because all' things were shaken when the Lord was crucified, trembling at the audacity of the impious Jews, not enduring tliat their Lord shoulcl be insulted ; at evening giving thanks, because He hath given the night for rest from our daily labours ; at cock-crowing, because that hour gives the glad tidings that the day is dawning in which to work the works of light." [Apostol. Coustit. viii. 34.] No account has come down to us «hich tells exactly of what these Primitive daily Offices consisted ; but St. Basil in the fourth century speaks of them as being made up of psalmody mingled with prayers, and specifies tlie nineteenth Psalm as one which was invariably used at the sixth hour. The fifty-first Psalm is also sheA\n, from him and other writers, to have been constantly used in the night service ; and the sixty-third was called the "Morning Psalm," being used at the beginning of the early service. The "Gloria in Excelsis " is also spoken of by St. Chrysostom as "the Morn- ing Hymn " [xee note in Communion Service], and the repeti- tion of the Kyrie Eleison many times seems to have formed another part of these ancient services. The daily Offices of the Eastern Church are of greater anti- quity than those of the AVestern, and there is little doubt that they represent, substantially, the form into which the Primitive Offices for the hours of Prayer eventually settled down.' Sufficient points of resemblance have been traced between these and the daily prayers used under the Jewish economy, to make it almost certain that the former vere originally derived from the latter.- But there are also many particulars in which the AA'estern daily Offices, and especially those of the English Church,-' are analogous to those of the East ; and although they cannot be traced higher, in their familiar form, tlian the rule of St. Benedict [a. D. S.^O], it can hardly be doubted that men like SS. Benedict and Gregory would build upon the old foundations of Primitive Services, such as those now represented by the hours of the Eastern Church. In the Ancient Sacramentaries there are several series of Collects for daily use : one set of twenty- three in that of St. Gregory being entitled "Orationes de Adventu Domini quotidianis diebus:" another, of twenty, apparently for Lent, being headed "Orationes pro peccatis :" a third of many more in number being called ' ' Orationes quotidianaj. " There are also other sets in the same Sacra- mentary, "ad Matutinos lucescente die," "Orationes Matu- tinales," " Vespertinales, " and "ad Completorium." What place such Collects occupied in the dailj' Offices is not quite clear, but they plainly shew that the Primitive habit of the Church was kept up, and that daily prayers were con- tinually being oft'ered in the Western as well as in the Eastern Church. Lessons from Holy Scripture were only read in the Synagogue on the Sabbath Day ; in the Temple none at all (except the Decalogue) were ever read. This custom was continued throughout the Church even until the * They are given at length in Neale's Inttvd. Hist, of Eoitern Chun-h, \o\. ii. cli. iv. - Fbeejian's Princ. Div. Serv. i. 65. *' Ihid. lOfi. 178 3n JntroDiiction to Scorning anD (JEticning; IPrapcr. time of St. Gregory : Epistles and Gospels being read at tlie Holy Communion, but no Lessons at the hours of Prayer. St. Gregory established a system which afterwards devel- oped into that of the Breviary Lessons, but in the Eastern Church the Primitive practice of reading Holy Scripture at the celebration of the Eucharist, and ou Sunday only at other offices, is still maintained. In Mediaaval times the daily Offices were developed into a very beautiful, but a very complex form ; being moulded exclusively to the capacities of Clergy and Laity living in com- munities, separated from the world especially for a work of prayer and praise, which was seldom interrupted by the calls of other avocations. Those used in England diflered in several im- portant respects from the Roman Breviary,' and are supposed to have had the same origin as the Communion Office, the line- age of which is traced in the Introduction to the Communion Service to the Church of Ephesus. Like those of the Eastern and Roman Churolies, they consisted nominally of seven separ- ate services or hours [see p. 17] ; but as in those churches at tlie present day these seven hours are aggregated into three, or even two services, so it is probable was the case, to a great ex- tent, in the Mediaeval Church of England, and the whole seven were only kept by a small number of the most strict among the Clergy and religions. The Reformers condensed the seven hours instead of agrjrer/ating them, and thus gave us Mattins and Evensong, as in the manner shewn by the Table at p. 17. At the same time, the publication of Edward VI. 's and Queen Elizabeth's Primers shewed that they by no means intended to hinder, but rather to encourage those who still wished to observe the ancient hours of Prayer ; and the Devotions of Bishop Cosiu, with other iLanuals framed on the same model, Iiave given many devout souls the opportunity of supplementing the public Mattins and Evensong with prayers at other hours that equally breathed the spirit of the ancient Church. 1 Freeman's Priiic. Div. Serv. i. 246. In making this change the Reformers were doubtless endeavouring to secui"e by a modification of the Services what the theory of the Churcli had always required, the attend- ance of tlie Laity as well as tlie Clergy at the Daily Offices of Praise and Prayer. From very early days tlie Church of England had enjoined the Laity to be present at tliem, as may be seen in the collection of Decrees and Canons on the subject printed by Maskell [Mon. Hit. Ang. III. xxv-xxxiv.] ; but these injunctions appear to have been little obeyed, and their constant absence led the Clergy to deal with the Breviary as if it was intended for tlieir own use alone, its structure becoming so complex that none but those who had been long used to handle it could possibly f i >llow the course of the services day by day. In forming out of tliese complex services sucli simple and intelligible ones as our present Morning and Evening Prayer, a new opportunity was ofifered to the Laity of uniting their hearts and voices with those of the Clergy in a constant service of daily praise and prayer. Churches without such an offering of Morning and Evening Prayer are clearly alien to the sj'stem and principles of the Book of Common Prayer, if taken in their strict sense ; and to make the ofiering in the total absence of worshippers seems scarcely less so. But as eveiy Church receives blessing from God in proportion as it renders to Him the honour due unto His Name, so it is much to be wished that increased know- ledge of devotional principles may lead on to such increase of devotional practice as ma}' make the omission of the daily Offices rare in the Churches of our land. Then indeed miglit the time come when the Cliurch of England could say, " Thou, O God, sentest a gracious rain upon Thine inheritance ; and refreshedst it wlien it w-as weary." It might look for the developement of a perennial vigour springing from that "third hour of the day " when the Apostles first went forth in the might of their supernatural endowments ; and it might hope to meet with answers from on high, as sure as that which was given to Elijah "about the time of the Evening Sacrifice." JratgfB lie tfje ILotD nailp: cbcit t\\e (Son EJljo liefpctli iis, ano poiitctl) iy\e icntfits uijon iis. 3)aj bp Bap toe magnifii tETjce, ann toe toorsliip STjj JSamc : cuct tootiD toitljout cnn. THE ORDER FOR MORNING AND EVENING PRAYER DAILY TO BE SAID AND USED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. rpHE Morning and Evening Prayer shall be used in the accustomed place of the Church, Chapel, or Chancel ; except it shall be otherwise determined by the Ordinary of the place. And the Chancels shall remain as they have done in times past. And here is to be noted, That such Ornaments of the Church, and of the j\Iinisters thereof at all times of their the accustomed place of the Church, Chapel, or Chancel] The rubric determining the place in which Mattins and Evensong (aa distinct from the Litany and tlie Holy Communion) are to ho said or sung has remained unaltered since tliS revision of Queen Elizabeth's reign, a.d. 1559. In the first English Prayer Book, that of 1549, the germ of this rubric stood at the head of Morning Prayer in the words, " The Priest being in the Quire, shall begin with a loud voice the Lord's Prayer, called the Puter iioster ,-" the Quire being thus taken for granted as the place where Divine Service was to be said or sung. In the second Prayer Book, that of 1552, the rubric was enlarged in this form : "IT The Morning and Evening Prayer shall be used in such place of the Church, Chapel, or Chancel, and the Minister shall so turn him, as the people may best hear. And if there be any controversy therein, the matter shall be referred to the Ordinary, and he or his deputy shall appoint the place, and the chancels shall remain as they have done in times past. " At this time many Puritans, such as Bishop Hooper, desired to have the ancient custom altered, and the service said in the nave of the Church. "I could wish," said Hooper, "that the magistrates should put both the preacher, minister, and the people into one place, and shut up the partition called the chancel which separates the congregation of Christ one from the other." [Hooper's Serm. iv. on Jonah.] The practice of saying the service in the chancel was also declared to be " Antichristian " by Martin Bucer : and on this plea it was forbidden in Queen Elizabeth's reign by a few lawless Bishops, such as Scambler of Peterborough. And the Chancels shall remain as they hare done in times past] This does not mean that the chancels are not to be destroyed, but that their interior arrangement shall continue as " in times past, " that is, in times before 1552, when the words were introduced into the rubric. A century later Archbishop Juxon's Visitation Articles inquire, "Do the chancels remain as they have done in times past, that is to sa}', in the con- venient situation of tlie seats, and in tlie ascent or steps appointed anciently for tlio standing of the Holy Table?" To meet the growing disposition to disuse and dismantle the chancels, some special directions were given among "Orders" issued in the latter part of 1561.' It was there ordered that Rood lofts which remained " untransposed shall be so altered, that the upper part of the same, with the SoUer, be quite taken down, unto the upper parts of the vaults and beam running in length over the said vaults, by putting some convenient crest upon the said beam towards the Church, 1 "Orders taken the x day of Octuliei-, iu the third year of the reign of our Sovereign Lady, Elizabeth, Queen of En^dand, France, and Ireland, De- fender of the Faith, etc. By virtue of her Majesty'.s Letters acklressed to her Hij^hness' Connnissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical as followeth." (Brit. Mas. 5155 aa. They are printed iu IIeylin's Hist, lieform. Eecl. Hist. Soc. ed. 1849, ii. 360 ; aurl also in Pebry's lawful CImrch Oiniamcnts, p. 276.] with leaving the situation of the seats (as well in the Quire as in the C^iurch) as heretofore hath been used. Provided yet that where any parisli of their own costs and charges by common consent will pull down tlie wliole frame, and re-edify- ing tlie same in joiners' work (as in divers churches within the city of London doth appear), that they may do as they think agreeable, so it be to the height of the upper beam aforesaid. Provided also that where in any parish church the said Rood loftes be already transposed, so that there remain a comely partition betwixt the Chancel and the Church that no alteration be otlier%vise attempted in them, but be sutfered in quiet. And where no partition is standing, there to be one appointed." Up to a still later date there was, in fact, no other place provided for the Clergy to say the service from than the ancient seats in the chancel, and the "accustomed place " was the " pue " (beginning then to be so called) in which the Clergy and singers sat, and of which one was ordinarily situated on each side of the chancel. In the Advertisements of 1565, to which the authority of the Crown could not be obtained, and which were is.sued by Archbishop Parker on his own responsibility for the Province of Canterbury only, it was directed "that the Common Prayer be said or sung decently and distinctly, in such place as the Ordinary shall think meet for the largeness and strait- ncss of the church and choir, so that the people may be most edified." [Cardw. Dociim. Ann. i. 291.] This shews the origin of the "reading-desk" in the nave of the church, which eventually became so common. Such a disuse of the chancel led to an important change in the character of Divine Service by the abolition of choral service, the "clerks" who were accustomed to sit in the chancel seats and sing the respon.sive parts of the service being reduced to one "clerk," who sat in a seat in front of the "reading-desk," and said them in a manner that was seldom befitting the dignity of Divine Service. Instead, moreover, of the chancels remaining as they had done in times past, they were too often looked on either as a kind of lumlier-room, to be cleared out once a quarter fur the administration of the Holy Communion ; or as a part of the church where the most comfortable and honourable seats were provided for the richer laity. Such customs have tended to obscure the sense of the rubric, and are recalled to memory only for the purpose of explaining how it came to be so disregarded in modern times. In Griffin r. Dightou, Chief-Justice Erie decided (on appeal in ISG-t) that the chancel is, by the existing law, the place appointed for the Clergyman and for those who assist him in the performance of Divine Service ; and that it is entirely under his control as to access and use, subject to the juris- diction of the Ordinary. And here is to be noted. That siie!i Ornaments of the Church] This has been popularly called " The Ornaments Rubric," and may also he fittingly regarded as the Interpretation Clause to i8o Cfjc SDrDcr for Scorning aiiD (JB\)cnin5 Prapcr. Jlinistration, shall be retained, and be in use, as were in this Churcli of England by the authority of Parliament, in the second Year of the reign of King Echo. VI. the Ritual Law of the Church of England. It is commented upon at length in the third section of the Ritual Introduction, pages 63-80. in the second Year of the reiijn of Kimj Edu'. VI.] Tlie year thus indicated extended from January 28, 1548, to January 27, 1549. [Nicolas' Chron. Hist. 330, ed. 1833.] As the first Prayer Book of Edward VI. 's reign, with the rest of the Act of Uniformity, passed the House of Lords on January 15th, and the House of Commons on .January 21, 1549, it is posf-ih/p that it had received the Royal Assent, and had thus "the authority of Parliament " before the expiration of this "second year" of Edward VI. on the 27th ; but there is no evidence known to shew that such was the case, and all the evidence which is known is to the contrary : moreover, the book was not published until March 7th, and its use was ordered to begin only on June 9, 1549, more than four months after that "second year" of Edward's reign had ended. The "Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers there- of," which were in vse in the Clmrch of England by authority of Parliament from January 28, 1548, to January 27, 1549, the second year of Edward VI,, must therefore be understood as meaning those which had been used before the publication of the Prayer Book in the third year of Edward VI., and these were such Ornaments as had been in use previously to that King's reign, subject to such omissions as were made necessary by changes effected under .Statutory authority. THE ORDER FOR -MOENING- PKAYEE DAILY THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. H At the beginning of 'Morning Prayer the 'Minister shall read with a loud voice some one "'or more of these sentences of the .Scriptures that follow. And then he shall say that which is written after the said sentences. WHEN the wicked man turnetli away from his wickedness that he hath committed, II Matins [15J9 only). b From here to tlie cii.l or the Rubric fuUowint,' the Ab- solution'! 1552!. ^itit li/ztrwise of I-l renin f^ Prayer (■5521 (- " hxecittor offi- cii" of Saruni riil». rics. d or 7itOie [1662J. and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive. Ezek. xviii. 27. I acknowledge my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me. Ps. \\. 3. Hide Thy face from my sins, and blot out all mine iniquities. rs. li. 9. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit : a The Order for Horning Prayer] The word "Order" in the sense here intended has almost passed out of use. It simply means regulation or ordinance, according to its derivation from the Latin word crdo. Morning Praj'er was called by the ancient popular name of "Mattins" (.abbreviated from ilatutincv), in the original English Praj'er Book of 1549 ; and that convenient name is still retained in tlie three Tables of Proper Lessons and Proper Psalms, and also in the Eliza- betlian Act of Uniformity. llie Minister'] Th.it is, the person who ministers, whether Bishop, Priest, or, perliaps. Deacon. In the Latin Rubrics the corresponding term is " Executor officii. " In the Rubric's of the Confirmation Office of 1549 the Bishop is called "Minister." In the fourth Rubric .at the beginning of the Communion Service of the same date the Celebrant is calleil " the Priest that shall execute the holy Ministry. " In Queen Elizabeth's time the old Latin word was still in use, e.g. "Item. That the Ministers receiving the Communion at the h,ands of the Executor be placed kneeling next to tlie Table. " [Bishops' Interpr. of Queen EUzabith's Injunctions ; C.^i;dweli., Doc. Ann. i. 206.] Other examples might be given. In Bishop Cosin's revision he appended to the word "Minister" the following note: "Th.at is, he who at that time niinistereth or celebrateth Divine Service ; " and although it was not deemed necessary at the time to print this note, it is valu.able to us now as shewing the technical meaning which was attached to the wortl Minister when usetl in the Rubric. THE .SENTENCES. The ancient Mattins of the Church of England began with, " In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" (and the sign of the Cross), followed by an inaudible recitation of the Lord's Prayer by the Priest who officiated. Then was said, "O Lord, open Thou my lips : And my mouth shall shew forth Thy praise. " This opening of the service was retained in the 1549 Prayer Book, but the Lord's Prayer was directed to be said "with a loud voice, " instead oi seC7-eto. In the 1532 Prayer Book, these Sentences, with the Exhorta- tion, Confession, ami Absolution, were prefixed to Morning Prayer, but not to Evening Prayer. Tliia addition was suggested, probably, by the second reformed Breviary of Cardinal Quignonez, in which the ancient Confession and Absolution, hereafter given, were placed at the beginning of Mattins. But other reasons are also apparent for the change. In the first place, the full effect of the dissolution of Monas- teries was making itself felt by ritualists, and a penitential prefix to the service was considereil moi'e appropriate for a, mixed congreg,ation than the previous mode of opening it, which was suitable for communities professedly spending nearly their whole time in the religious portion of a Christian's duty. And, in the second place, a relaxation of the ride about private Confession made it expetlient to place a public Confession and Absolution within the reach of all, day by day. The Sentences themselves (which had nearly all been pre- viously in use as Capitnia, during Lent) are a reproduction at the beginning of Divine Service of the Invitatories which were prefixed to the Venite in tlie ancient Mattins. In both cases the object is to give the keynote to the service which is to follow. In the Salisbury use two such Sentences, with a Versicle and Collect, were prefixed to i\Lattins on Easter Day. These were still ordered to be "solemnly sung or said " in the same phace in the 1549 Pnayer Book ; but on the appointment of the Sentences now in use, the former were directed to be used instead of Venite, and are printed before the Easter Collect. It was in this light that the Sentences were viewed by Bishop Amlrewes, who suggested some others in the follow- ing note : "Adde hue, quod ad invitandam pcenitentiam egregia sunt misericordi.-e et longanimitatis encomia ; Ps. Ixxviii. 38 ; Jer. iii. 7, 12 ; Heb. iv." As Invitatories intended to gnve the keynote to the Service, they may be advantageously used in the follow ing, or some similar, order, appropriate to the various days and seasons : — Advent; "Repentye." "Enternot." "0 Lord, correct me." Lent: " The sacrifices." "Rend your heart. " Friilays and Vigils : "I acknowdedge." Wednesdays : "Hide thy face." Ordinary d.ays : " When the wicked man." " I will arise." "If we s.ay. " Sundays, other holydays, and Eves : "To the LordourGod." There is a well-known traditional practice of singing one of these Sentences as an anthem ; "I will arise " being very fre- quently so used. Such a practice seems to be in strict keep- ing with their character as Invitatories, and in analogy with the use of the ICaster Sentences referred to ; as also w ith such a use of the Offertory Sentences in the Communion Service. read n:ilh a loud voice] This i.s an ecclesiastical or technical phr.ase, the explanation of which is to be found in a Rubric before the 7't" Denm in the previous editions of the Prayer Book : "Then shall be read two Lessons distinctly with a loud voice." "Then shall the Lessons be sung in a plain tune, after the manner of distinct reading ; and likewise the Epistle and (iospel." It is the clara vox of older ritualists, and presupposes a musical intonation, with or without inflec- tion, to be the customary way of reciting Divine Service. The old use of the word is illustrated by two passages iu .an ancient treatise on Divine Service. "And this solemp- nyte asketh both inwarde besynes to haue deuocyon in harte, and also in syngyng and redyng zoith tongue." The writer, a little further on, censures those who use their o%vn private devotions while Divine Service is going on, or " whjde other syng yt or rede yt by note." [.l/(>ro)- of our Lady, Blunt's ed. pp. 22, 23.] Some may consider that the terms of the Rubric, both here and before the Offertory Sentences, strictly limit the recitation of them to tlie clergyman officiating. There is, however, no ritual principle by which they are so limited. l82 corning Iprapcr. broken and a contrite heart, O God, Thou wilt not despise. I's- li- 17. Eeud j-our heart, and not j'our garments, and turn unto the Lord your God : for He is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kind- ness, and repenteth Him of the evil. Joel n. 13. To the Lord our God belong mercies and for- givenesses, though we have rebelled against Him : neither have we obeyed the voice of the Lord our God, to walk in His laws which He set before us. Dan. ix. S, 10. Lord, correct me, but with judgement ; not in Thine anger, lest Thou bring me to nothing. Jek. X. 21. Ps. vi. 1. Repent ye ; for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand. S. Matt. iii. 3. 1 will arise, and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against Heaven, and before thee, and am no more worthy to be called thy sou. s. Luke xv. is, 19. Enter not into judgement with Thy servant, O Lord ; for in Thy sight shall no man living be ju-stified. Ps. cxiiii. 2. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive our- selves, and the truth is not in us : but, if we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteous- ness. 1 .S. John i. 8, 9. DEARLY beloved brethren, the Scripture moveth us in sundry places to acknow- ledge and confess our manifold sins and wicked- ness ; and that we should not dissemble nor cloke them before the face of Almighty God our heavenly F.\ther ; but confess them with an humble, lowly, penitent, and obedient heart ; to the end that we may obtain forgiveness of the same, by His infinite goodness and mercy. And although we ought at all times humbly to ac- knowledge our sins before God ; yet ought we most chieflj' so to do when we assemble and meet together, to render thanks for the great benefits that we have received at His hands, to set forth His most worthy praise, to hear His most holy Word, and to ask those things which are requisite and necessary, as well for the body as the soul. Wherefore I pray and beseech yon, as many as are here present, to accompany me with a pure heart and humble voice, unto the throne of the heavenly grace, saying after me ; IT A general Confession to be said of the whole con- gregation after the Minister, " all kneehng. ALillGHTY and most merciful Father ; We ^* have erred, and strayed from Thy ways like lost sheep. We have followed too much the devices and desires of our own hearts. We have THE EXHORTATION. There is an analogy between this E.xliortation and some which were used, at the Holy Conmiunion and in Lent, in tlie ancient services of the Church of England. Tliere is also a trace of similarity between it and tlie opening of Poull.^in's L'Ordre ties Pricres Ecclesiasliqiies, printed for the use of the German refugees at Glastonbury, in ISoi. Tlie words of the latter are, " JIe3 Frires, qu'un chascun de vous se jiresente devant la face du Seigneur, aveo confession de ses {antes et pd'chez, suyvant de tout son cueur mes [paJroUes. " ' But there is too little resemblance between our Exhortation and these to give any critical ground for supposing that it was founded upon any of them ; and it must be concluded that those who revised the Praj'er Book in 1552 were entirely resjjonsible for its composition. It has been called a short homily on Divine worship ; and may also be taken as following up the general Invitatory, as it was followed formerly by the Venite. It was probably inserted here under the impression that the people at large were e.xtremely ignorant of the true nature of Divine worship at the time. Five jjrincipal parts of worship are mentioned in it : [I] Confession of sin ; [2] Absolution ; [;J] Thanksgiv- ing and Praise ; [4] The hearing of God's Word ; [5] Prayer for spiritual and bodily benefits. In this structure also it bears some analogy to the Venite. The Minister celebr.xting Divine Service is directed to "say" tliia Exhortation, "saying" being the ritual term for reciting on one musical note, or "monotoning," as distin- guished from "singing," wliich is reciting with musical inflec- tions, and from "reading," wliich isageuer.al term, including both methods. If the Exhortation is said from memory, and with the face turned towards the congregation, it becomes much more expressive of the intention with which it was placed here, than when said as a mere form for passing away a few seconds, while tlie congregation is settUug into a devotional frame of mind. humble roiri] 'I'liis ri'iiresents the suhinUm vox of old Rubrics. It indicates a low pitcli of voice within the reach of all ; anil where the service is musical tlie Confession is best said ou E. a/ler me] Sec the next note. THE GENERAL CONFESSION. u/ler the Minialer] Bishop Cosin erased tlic word "after" ' Thin hook vrm also printed In Lntin, perhaps boforo it came out i Frtneh. Tlic Frcncli cUiUuu Bccins to be virv rare. in this Rubric, and substituted "with;" but the original word was carefully restored, shewing tliat a distinction was intended between the two words in their ritual use. "After the Jlinister " means, that each clause is to be said first by the Minister alone, and then repeated by " the whole congre- gation" alone — i.e. while the Minister remains silent, as in the case of a response after a versicle. " With" tlie Minister me.ans simultaneous recitation by him and the congregation together, and is ordered in the Rubric before the Lord's Prayer. Perhaps this was for no other reason than that tlie formulary was a new one, and tliat the people, not commonly using Prayer Books, required to be "taught by the Priest" in. this manner, according to the expression used in the Rubric pre- fixed to the giving of the ring in the Marriage Service. all kjieeling] The word "all" w.as also one of Bishop Cosin's additions, and is illustrated by liis note in another volume: "Kneeling is the most lit gesture for humble penitents ; and being so, it is strange to see how in most places men are sutt'ered to sit rudely and carelessly on their seats all the ivliile this Confession is read ; and others that be in church are nothing ail'ected with it. They think it a thing of iudifferency forsooth, if the heart be riglit." This sitting posture during public confessions was one of the abuses tliat scandalized the Puritans ; .and they sought to have a Canon p.assed, enjoining .all to kiiccl. The eighteenth Canon does indeed direct that "all maimer of persons then present shall reverently kneel upon their knees when the general Confession, Litany, and other prayers are read . . . testifying by these outward ceremonies and gestures their inward humility. ..." The gesture of kneeling here and elsewhere is not only a mark ofjierson.al humility and reverenro, Imt also one of those acts reipiiri'd of every one as an individual coinponcnt part of the body which forms the congregation ; .and to neglect it is to neglect a duty which is owing to God and man in this respect, as well as the othei'. We have no riglit to con- spicuous jirivate gestures in a public devoticuial assembly; nor are the gestures which we there use (in conformity to the rules of the Church) to be neccss.arily interpreted as hypo- critical because our personal habits or feelings may not be entirely consistent with them. As the Clergy h.ave an official duty in church, irrespective i^f their personal ch.ar.acters, so also have the Laity. It m.-iy be added, that a respectful con- formity to rules enjoining such oflicial duties may often lead onward to true personal reverence and holiness. As far as present researches shew, the general Confession appears to be an origin.al composition of some of the revisers of 1552 ; but its priucip.al features .are, of course, represented aborning Prayer. 183 offended against Thy holy laws. We have left undone those things winch wo ought to have done ; And we have done those things which we ought not to have done ; And there is no ''health in us. IJut Thou, O Lokd, have mercy upon us, nuserable offenders. Spare Thou them, O God, which confess their faults. Restore Thou them that are penitent ; According to Thy promises declared unto mankind in Christ Jesu our Loed. And grant, O most merciful Father, for His sake; Tliat we may hereafter live a godly, righteous, and sober life, To the glory of Thy holy Name. Amen. IT The Absolution, 'or Remission of sins, to be jiro- iiounceil by the Priest iiloue, ''staudiug : the people still kueeling. ALMIGHTY God, the Father of our Lord -lJl_ Jesus Christ, Who desireth not tlie death of a sinner, but rather that he may turn from his 11 1'.^.spiritual sound- ness, the SDUntliicss nf a perfect heart. [Comfi, I's. iiq. 80. Si 101. 2, 6. & 41. 4. & 147. 3.] « Moz. lirev. Wed. Matt. alt. Advent. cor . . . Ji'«j[i662l. d stnndiU)^ . . , /■««/:»£■ [1662]. e Ordo Poenitentis, A.D. 900. MART1-.N1-, de An- iitj. l=td. Ril. i. 803, 8i4- *rac nos, DoMiNE, juste, ct sobrie. ct pie, in hoc sseculo vivere. 'T^OMINE Deus omnipotens, Qui non vis i-J mortem peccatorum, sed ut convertantur et vivant . . . in confessional formularies of the Ancient Church, the ideas being a common heritage of every age antl country. It has not undergone any alteration since its first introduction into ilorning I'rayer. It has been observed ^ that this general Confession appears to be founded on Romans vii. 8-25. We have followed too much Sin . . . wrought in me all the devices and desires of our conoupisceuce." own hearts. We have offended against The law is holy . . . but Thy holy laws. I am carnal, sold under sin. We have left undone those The good that I would, I do things which we ought to not. have done. We have done tliose things But the evil which I would which we ought not to have not, that I do done. And there is no health in us. In me dwelleth no good thing. . . . the body of this death. But Thou, Lord, have wretched man that I am, mercy upon us, miserable who shall deliver mo? offenders. According to Thy promises, I thank God, through Jesus declared unto mankind in Christ our Lord. Christ Jesu our Lord. All the plirases of the Confession have, however, a Scrip- tural ring ; and it was very likely compiled almost verbalim from some old English version of the Bible, or else freely rendered (according to the habit of the day in sermons) from the Vulgate Psalms and other Scriptures. The manner and siiirit in whicli a general confession of sins may be made personally and particularly applicable, is pointedly set forth in a Rubric which precedes tlie Confession to be used on board sliip when there is danger of shipwreck ; "When there is imminent d.anger, as many as can be spared from necessary service in the ship, shall be called together, and make an humble Confession of their sin to God, in which everyone ought seriously to reflect upon tliose particular sins of which his conscience sh.all accuse him, saying as foUoweth." That a confession so made can be otherwise than acceptable to the Good Shepherd .and Physician of our souls it is impos- sible to doubt. That further and more detailed confession is also sometimes necessary, the jirovisions made by the Church for her penitents, and the private habits of all piuus Christians, make equally certain. Tlie " Amen " is part of the Confession, and is to be said by the Minister as well as the people, as is indicated by the type in which it is printed. THE ABSOLUTION. to be pronounced] This is an authoritative and magisterial term, as is shewn by its use in the Mai-riage Service, where 1 Freeman's rrincipks 0/ Divine Service, i. 320. the Priest is directed to say, "Forasmuch as ... I pro- nounce that they be Man and Wife, in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." So also in the Commination Service we find the expression used respecting the final condemnation of sinners, "0 terrible voice of most just judgement, which shall be pronounced upon them. " In Scotch sentences of death the judge uses the words, " This I pronounce for doom. '' hi/ the Priest alone, stdndinf/l This Rubric stood in the form "by the Minister alone'' until 16G1. Bishop Cosiu altered it to "by tlie Minister alone, standing, and all the people still kneeling," and his alteration suljsequently de- veloped into the e.xisting words before the revision was completed. The reason for inserting the word "standing" was that some of the Clergy had been accustomed to read it on tlieir knees ; although, as Bishop .Andrewes wrote, " because he speaks it antlwritalive, in the Name of Clu-ist and His Church, the Minister must not kneel, but stand up, " and this posture was observed by the majority. The other three words, "the Priest alone," have a history which fixes their meaning. At the Savoy Conference of 16G1 the Presby- terians' eleventh "exception " to tiie Prayer Book was to the effect that as the word ' ' Minister " was used in the Rubric before the Absolution, and not " Priest," or " Curate," there- fore it shoulil be used instead of those %\ords throughout the book. To this it was replied by the Church of England Commissioners that it would be unreasonable to use the word Minister alone ; for "since some parts of the Liturgy may be performed by a Deacon, others by none under the order of a Priest, viz. Absolution, Consecr.ation, it is fit that some such word as Priest should be used for those officers, and not Minister, which signifies at large every one that ministers in that holy office, of what Order soever he be." The word "Minister" had formerly been used as identical with "Priest," as may be seen by the 32nd Canon, which forbids Bishops to "make any person, of what qualities or gifts soever, a Deacon and a Minister both together upon one day." This distinc- tive meaning hatl now jiassed away, and "Ministers" was colloquially the name for Dissenting preachers, and for Clergymen of every Order. By the insertion of the new word, therefore, the whole Rubric was intended to enjoin, not only that the congregation are not to repeat the Aljsolution, as they have repeated the Confession, but also th.at it must not be said by a Deacon. If a Deacon says Morning or Evening Prayer in the presence of a Priest, the latter must say the Absolution ; and if no Priest is present, the Deacon may make a pause, to give opportunity for the ofi'ering up of a short secret prayer by himself and the congregation, and then pass on to the Loi'd's Prayer. The Absolution -nas composed by the Revisers of 1552, evidently with the old form of Absolution, which was used iu the Prime and Compline Services, before them. There is also some similarity between the opening words and those of a prayer which was placed at the end of the Litany in the Primer of 1535; and which again, from the prayer, "Forgive us now while we have time and space," seems to have been founded on the ancient Absolution, with its " spatium vera; 1 84 Scorning lpraj)cr. wickedness, and live ; and liatli given power, and commandment, to His Ministers, to declare and pronounce to His people, being penitent, the Absolution and Kemission of their sins : *He par- doneth and absolveth all them that truly repent, and unfeignedly believe His holy Gospel. Wherefore "let us beseech Him to grant us true repentance, and His Holy Spirit, that those things may please Him, which we do at this present ; and that the rest of our life hereafter may lie pure, and holy ; so that at the last we a Manciiu, i. ;qo. , "Deus omnipotcns Salvator et Redemptor ' generis humani, Qui apostolis 8uis dedit po- j testatem ligandi atque solvendi Ipse te absol- i s« note on ii,e vere dlguetur . . . 'Misereatur vestri omnipo- tens Deus, et dimittat vobis omnia peccata conservet et Comforuble Words in the Communion i /sTr"'coTO/. All. ' '^©st'""' • liberet vos ab omni malo ; coramllnion. ""'*' I confimiet in bono ; et ad vitam perducat reter- rf In orig. MS. ■• l.e- ! t^o^.,, A nipn us " inserted by later hand. Absolutionem et remissionem omnium' pecca- torain vestroruni, spatium ver« pcBnitentis, em- endationem vitas, gratiam et consolationem Sancti pcenilentiw," though the first part is identical with a Lenten Collect of St. Gregory's Saorameutary. Some phrases, a good deal like t)iose of our Absolution, are also fouud in the form of prayer got up by John a Lasco, . or Laski, a Polish refugee, for the Germau congregation which he was allowed to gather together at Austin-friars in London ; but the likeness is not such as to make it probable that tlie English form was derived fx-om hi.s Latin one, though it does rather indicate that both were in part derived from some such originals as those printed in the te.xt above. Two questions have been raised with respect to this form of Absolution. First, whether those who composed it, and placed it where it is, intended it for an Absolution of penitent sinners, or merely for a declaration of God's mercy. Secondlj', whether, irrespective of their intention, it is so constructed as to be effective for the remission of sins. [1] The first question is all but decided by the title. Here, in the Communion SerWce, and in the Prayers to be used at Sea, the same word, "Absolution." is used for designating two different forms ; and in the Visitation of the Sick, the third form in use by the Church of England is spoken of in the direction "the Priest shall absolve him." It seems beyond all probability that this designation could have been used of all three forms without any verbal distinction, and yet that a real difference of meaning lay hidden under the use of it, and that to such an extent as to make it in one place contradictory of itself in another place. What the word "Absolution" in the rubrical title so far proves, is confirmed by the addition made to it at the Hampton Court Conference of 1604, when it was altered to the "Absolution, or yemiifsion of sins," clearly shewing what opinion the Divines there assembled held respecting the intention with which the form was inserted fifty-one years before. It is still further confirmed by a note of Bishop Andrewes (one already quoted), in which, after saying that the Absolution is pronounced aiithoritatiri, he adds, "For authority of Abso- lution, see Ezek. xxxiii. 12 ; Job xxxiii. 2,3 ; Numb. vi. 24 ; 2 Sam. xii. 13; John xx. 2,3." An examination of these passages of Scripture will shew that Bishop Andrewes (one of the most learned theologians and Scriptural scholars that the Church of England has ever had) must certainly have supposed that this was intended for an actual Absolution ; and that, in his opinion, it was such. ["2] The Absolution itself is constructed on a similar principle to that on which Collects are formed ; and as the precatory part of a Collect is sometimes veiy short and condensed,' so here the actual words of Absolution are only "He pardoneth and absolveth all them that truly repent and unfeignedly believe His holy Gospel." The preceding portion is a state- ment of the antecedent reasons — tiod's mercy, and the delegation of His authority — for pronouncing Absolution ; and what follows is an authoritative exhortation to follow up the words of temporary confession and absolution with prayer for perseverance and final pardon. The words which thus form the essence of the Absolution are of a declaratory kind, while those in the old Morning and Evening Services of the Church were precatory, as may be seen from the original Latin form printed above, and its Kngli.sh tr.anslation in the note below ; but the change has rather strengthened than weakened the force of the form adopted. Nor nmst we be led away by the word "declaratory," so often used to ilistinguish this from the other two forms of Absolution used in the Prayer Book; for to "declare" God's pardon of sinners is to give effect to that pardon, as when the authorized subordinate of an earthly sovereign declares pardon in that > Ste IntroductiiiD to llic ColkcU, Epistles, and Oospclii. sovereign's name. This form is, in fact, closely analogous to the formulary of Baptism used in the Eastern Church : "The servant of God (N. ) is baptized in the Name of the Father, Amen, and of the Son, Amen, and of the Holy Ghost, Amen." Andas these words are undoubtedly sufficient for fulfilling our Lord's words, "Baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, ' so are the absolving words of our Absolution sufficient to fulfil His other words, " ^YllOse soever sins ye remit, they are remitted luito them." The special form in which the Absolution is moulded was probably adopted from a careful consideration of the use which was to be made of it. It is an Absolution uttered, as Benedictions are uttered, over a mixed congregation, and yet it can only be efticacious towards those who have honestly said the Confession as it is intended to be said. The condi- tions of pardon are therefore distinctly expressed, that the impenitent may not be misled, and take to themselves a forgiveness to which they have no claim. Anil as it is a public Absolution, "He pardoneth and absolveth" is adopted in analogy with the "tribiiat I'ohis omnipotens et 7niserico7's Dojn/iiv-^," YAther than the positive form, "by His authority I absolve," as used in absolving individual penitents. - The effect of this Absolution in the daily services of the Church is [1] to reconcile the Church, as a community, daily to her God, through the mercies of Christ ; [2] to prepare each person present for the work of ottering praise to Him ; [.3] to convey pardon of sin to an extent correlative with true contrition in those over whom it is uttered. As was said in the case of the general Confession, that it does not supersede a particular confession ; so it must be remembered that the general Absolution does not supei'sede a particidar one. But tlie necessity for absolution is so great, that the Church has provided against any one being without it by this daily utter- ance of it, in which it is cast abroad as the Sower sowed his seed, on the stony as well as the good ground, or as God sends His rain upon the just and the unjust. It is a ministration in close analogy with the continual superabundance of the mercies of God in Christ, which flow down even to the skirts of our High Piiest's clothing. According to the ^^■ords, "freely ye have received, freely give," the Church casts her lireail upon the waters in faith, believing that God's word of absolution will not return unto Him void. And for its efficiency, in the words of a recent writer, "all that is needed is that there be fit, i.e. truly rej)cntaut recipients of it ; that secured, wheresoever it touches, it blesses and heals. " ■' Nevertheless it is pi-obable, for reasons given on the next page, that the Absolution was not intended to be invariably used at all week-day Services. " The ftiicicnt form of Confession, Misereatur, nnd Absolution, Wds as followfi, bt'iiig used in tlie midst of the preecs at Prime mid Compline : — The Priest, looking towanls the Altar, I confess to God, the Blessed Mary, and all the Saints [tttrning to the Choir], and to you, that 1 have sinned exceedingly in thought, word, and deed, of my own fault [looking Imck to the Altar], I iteseeeh Holy Mary, all the Saints of God, and [looking hack to the Choir] you to pr.ny for me. The Choir replies, turning to the Priest, Almighty God have merey uiion you, and forgive you all your sins, deliver you from all evil, preserve and strengthen you in all goodness, and bring you to everlasting life. Amen. Then the Choir, turning to the Altar, I confess to God ... to pray for mc. Then let the Priest say to the l^hoir, in the first jrerson, if necessary, Almighty God have mercy upon yon . . . everlasting life. Amen. The Almighty and merciful Lord grant yon Ah.solution and Tleniission of all your sins, space for true re)K'nt.Tnce, amendment of life, and the grace and consolation of the Holy Spirit. Amen. 3 Vnf.Kyws'n Principles of liivinc ."Service, i. 317. a9orninD Prapct. 185 may come to His eternal joy ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. IT The people sliall answer "here, and at tlie end of all other prayers, Aiikii. II 'Then the Minister shall kneel and say the Lord's Prayer with an auilible voiee ; the people also kneeling and repeating it with him, botli here, and wheresoever else it is nscd in Divine Service. UR Father, Which art iu heaven, Hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Tliy o a /leif . . . prayers [1663J. ■ Sar. Adv. Siuiii. d M,l». 6. c,, n Spiritus, tribuat vohis omnipotens et misericors DoMiNUS. Amen.] ■Ad iMatutinas Ave Maria. diad sacerilos I'ater Noster cl [''IIATKP y/xCJv I) (V TO(S ovpai'oii, ay laa 6 1'lr 10 to oi'O/xa (70V. 'EAOerw -i) jSaaikeia crov y(Vi]d-i]T(o The people shall ansjoer] The words "here and at the end of all other prayers " were added by Bishop C'osin. The rules respecting the use of "Amen" in the Prayer Book appear to be these : [1] When it is used after acts of worship in whicli the Minister alone has spoken, as in Absolu- tions, Benedictions, and " other prayers," it is to be taken as a ratification by tlie people of wliat the Minister h.as said, and is to be said by the people only, in which cases the word is printed in italics. [2] When it is used at the end of for- mularies which the people say with the Minister, as in Con- fessions, the Lord's Prayer, Doxologies, and Creeds, it is to be said by botli as part of the formularies, and is then printed in Roman type. [3] In tlie Lord's Prayer at the beginning of the Communion Service, in the formula of Baptism, and in the reception of tlie baptized into Christian fellowship, it is a ratification by the speaker himself, and is not tQ be said by the people. At the end of this Rubric, in the Manuscript Prayer Book annexed to the Act of Uniformity, there are two thick lines drawn, with a considerable space above and below them, as here printed.' In the Black Letter Book of 1637 and in the Sealed Books these two lines also appear at tlie bottom of the p.ige, and at the top of the next page the headline " Morning," or " Evening, Prayer," followed by an elaborate floriated ornament extending across the page. It is evident that the Revisers intended a distinct break to be made between the Absolution and the Lord's Prayer ; but this has been neglected by subsequent printers of the Prayer Book. It may be added that the lines are carefully reproduced in the copy of the Rubrics which was printed from the MS. in the Fourth Report of the Ritual Commission, 1870, pp. 10, 12. In Bishop Cosin's Durham Book he wrote after the "Amen," "Place here afleuron," and at the head of the Lord's Prayer, over leaf, he has made a note, " Set here a faire compartment " [ornamental page-heading] "before this title." And although he has not erased the previous title before the Sentences, he has here repeated it, "An Order for Morning Prayer." He and the other Revisers probably contemplated the occasional use of a short service, from which all before the Lord's Prayer was to be omitted. In the first series of his notes on the Prayer Book [Cosin's irorfo, V. 47] he has also written on the Lord's Prayer, "Here begins the service ; for tliat which goes before is but a pre- paration to it, and is newly added in King Edward's Second Book, iu imitation of the Liturgy and Mass of tlie Church of Rome. But as their hours begin with the Lord's Prayer, so begins our Mattins and the high service of the altar. And they begin as they should do, for this was the ancient custom of the Christians when they were met together to pray ; they said that prayer for a foundation and a begin- ning of all the rest which Christ Himself had taught them. " [Comp. Works, ii. 9.] THE LORD'S PRAYER. Then the Minister'] From 15.52 to 1661 the Rubric stood, ' ' Then shall the Minister begin the Lord's Prayer with a loud voice." Before 1552 it had been "The Priest being in the quire, shall begin with a loud voice the Lord's Prayer, called the Paternoster. " It was altered to its present form by Bishop Cosin. The Mattins began here in the Prayer Book of 1549 ; and before that time the Lord's Prayer was said secretly by the Priest, the public part of the service beginning with the 1 Similar lines are drawn in the saiiif place of Evening Prayer, but tliere are no lines of the same kind anywhere else tlirougliout the mauuscript. " Domine, labia mea aperies," as is shewn in the Latin liubrio printed before that versicle. with liim] That is, simultaneously, clause by clause. wheresoever else it is vscil in Divine ^Service] Bishop Cosin overlooked the Rubric immediately before the Lord's Prayer in the Communion Service, which directs the Priest to say it, without any direction as to the people. It is not likely that there was any intention of overriding that Rubric by tliis. The Doxology was added here in 1G61, but not by Bishop Cosin, who wrote among some " Directions to be given to the printer," "Never print the Lord's Prayer beyond — deliver us from evil. Amen." The Doxology is supposed not to have been in the original of St. Matthew, as it is not in St. Luke. In the ancient Liturgies of the East, after "deliver us from evil " (said, with the rest of the prayer, by the people), the Priest offers a prayer against the evil and the Evil One, called the Embolismus ; and the Doxology is then sung by the people. Probably this is a primitive usage ; and the antiplion so sung has crept into the text of the Gospel. The paraphrase of Bishop Andrewes, in his note on the Lord's Prayer here, is very concise and instructive. Our Father. Etsi Issus est, Pater est. Which art iu heaven. Eminenter, noii inclusive. Hallowed lie Thy Name. In me, per me, super me. Thy kingdom come. Ut destruatur regnum peccati, per quod regnavit mors et diabolus. In earth. In me, qui sum terra. In heaven. A Sanctis angelis. Give us this day our daily. Pro necessitate. Bread. Proprium, licite acquisitum, superccelestera et corporeum. Forgive us our trespasses. Talenta dimitte. Lead us not. Nee sinas intrare ductos pronosque. I gxtra i ''■''^'-'"'o- From evil. Ab authore mali < ' \ niundo. ( intra, nobismetipsis. 1 culps; per gratiam. A malo < pceniB per misericordiain. f omni per pacem. Its fitness for use in the manner here directed by the Church is also beautifully brought out by Sir Richard Baker : "Though this prayer is the supplication of the whole body of the Church, and of every member thereof ; yet each petition seems to have some special relation to some peculiar member. For the first petition may not unfitly be thought the prayer of angels ; the second, the prayer of the saints departed ; the third, the jjrayer of the faithful living ; the fourth, the prayer of all creatures ; the fifth, the prayer of penitent sin- ners ; the sixth, the prayer of infants. "- The various modes iu which saints have used this Divine prayer with a special intention are almost infinite ; and it would be well for every one to follow their example, by hav- ing such a special intention in view wdienever it is said in the Services of the Sanctuary. In this pl.ioe, at any rate, it should be ofTered up as the complement and crown of the Absolution and Confession, on the one hand ; and laid hold of, on the other hand, as a mediatorial key, by wliich the door of heaven is to be opened for the ascent of the Church's praises to the Throne of God. It is a prayer, saj's the old Mirror of our Lady, that said in the Unity of the Church, is never unsped. Some ancient English versions of the Lord's Prayer will be found in the notes to Evening Prayer ; "where also will be found an exposition and a paraplirase ; the one, an ancient - Baker, On Vic Lord's Prayer, p. 51, ed. IGUS iS6 aborning; Ipraycr. will be done in earth, As it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, As we forgive them that trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation ; But deliver us from evil : "For Thine is the king- dom, The power, and the glory, For ever and ever. Amen. IT Then likewise lie shall say, '0 LoED, open Thou "'our lips. Answer. 'And ''our mouth shall shew forth Thy praise. Priest. ^0 God, make speed to save ■''us. Answer. ''0 Lord, make haste to help 'us. IT 'Here all standing up the Priest shall say, Glory be to the Father, and to the Son : and to the Holt Ghost ; Answer. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. (1 Doxolojjy added [■664 «Sar. c Ps. SI. 15- d 'fiy [1549 only]. <■ Ts. ss. 19. /Ps. 70. 1. ^' r/te [tsig oa\y]. h Ps. 33. =2. i Here [l66i]. TO Oi\-qy.a, (Tov, ws kv ovpavif Koi ewl t^s 7"yS. Toi/ apToi' ■i)fxwi> Tov eTTLOvcriov 5ds 'fj/iiv ari'niepov. Kat cii/jcs I'j/J.iv TO, otjieiXrjiiaTa y/J-dv, oil Kal ■iyul<; aI9 tlic old usage of B,aying the ' ' Hallelujah " from Easter to Trinity Sund.ay in this jilace was continued. It was expunged altogether in 15.")2 ; restored in the English form, " Praise ye the Lord," and for constant use, in the Elizabethan revision. The response to it, " The Lord's scorning: jprager. 187 Priest. Praise ye tlic Lord. "Answer. The Lord's Name be praised. H Then shall be said or sung ''this Psalm following ; ■^except on Easter Day, upon which another Anthem is ap[)iiinted ; and on the Nineteentli Day of every Month it is not to be read here, but in the ordinary eourse of the Psalms. /~\ COME, let ii.s siii.sj; unto the Vcnite. exultc mus Doinino. P.s. ,\cv. ct ll.S Lord : let u.s heartily rejoice in the strength of our salvation. Let us come before His presence with thanks- giving : and shew ourselves glad in Him with Psalms. For the Lord is a great God : and a great King above all gods. In His -^hand are all the corners of the earth ; and the strength of the hills is His also. The sea is His, and He made it : and His Lands prepared the dry land. O come, let us worship, and fall down : and kneel before the Lord our Maker. For He is the Lord our God : and we are the people of His pasture, and the sheep of His •^hand. To-day if ye will hear His voice, harden not a Atis. . . . fifttiseii ti662]. And from i.istcr to Trinity SiiikI.1v Untie- iiijah [1549 only]. ti ivitltoiit any iiivi- tatory [1549 only], c fxetM . . . Psalms [166=). rf Tile version is tlial of tlie Old Italic. e qnonmm . . . suam, nut in V'ulg. / \\. hanits. g niont. Ipsius sitnt. Vulg. Vlilfi, / Vuly, as Eni,r Alleluia \yel Laus Tibi, Domink, Kex seternse gloriie]. Sequatur invitatorium hoc modo. Psaljuum Vcnile . [Invitatory entire. ] ''VENITE, esultemus Domino, jubilemus Deo salutari nostro : prwoccupcmus facioni Ejus in confessione, et in psalmis jubilemus Ei. [Invitatory entii'e.] Quoniam Deus magnus Dominus, et Eex magniis super oiunes deos : 'quoniam non repellet Dominus plebein Suam, quia in mauu Ejus sunt omnes fines terras, et altitudines •^montium Ipse conspicit. [Invitatory, latter half. ] Quoniam Ipsius est mare, et Ipse fecit illud ; et ''aridam fuudaverunt manus Ejus : venite, adci- remus et procidamus ante Deum, ploremus coraix. Domino Qui fecit nos ; Quia Ipse est Dominus Deus noster, nos autem ijopulus Ejus, et eves pascua; Ejus.' [Invitatory entire. ] Hodie, si vocem Ejus audieritis, nolite obdu- Name be praised, " is first found in the Scottish Prayer Book of 1637, and was inserted herein 1661. The latter represents in an unvarying form the variable invitatories which used to precede the Venite in the old Latin services. There are two ancient customs still kept up with respect to the Gloria Fatri. The one is that of turning to the Kast, as in the recitation of a Creed, whenever it is said or sung in Divine Service ; an usage enjoined in the ancient Psalter of the Church of England, and still observed in many Churches, as, for example, at Manchester Cathedral. The other custom is a more genera! one, that of reverently inclining the head during the first half of the hynm, as a humble gesture recog- nizing the Divine glory of each of the Three Persons, and in imitation of the gesture of the angels, who veil their faces with their wings when singing to the glory of the Trinity in the vision of Isaiah. An old Canon of the Church of Englaml enjoins ; " Qtiotiesque dicitur Gloria Patri et Filio et Spiritui Saneto, ad eadem verba Deo humiliter se inclinent. " [Wilkins' Cone. iii. 20.] And in the Mirror there is the direction, "Ye incline at Gloria Patri." Bishop Cosin wished to revive the use of Invitatories on Sundays, having inserted this Rubric in the Prayer Book which was laid before the Revisers of 1601, immedi.ately after "Praise ye the Lord :" "And upon any .Sunday, or Lord's Day, this commemoration of His rising from the dead shall be said or sung, ' Priest, Christ is risen againe,' etc. And upon the Feast of Easter, Christ, our Passover, is offered up for us. Therefore, let us keep the feast, etc., jit in die Pasck. Then shall be said or sung," the ]'cnitc as we now have it. Then shall be said or sung] This Rubric, as altered by Bishop Cosin, has great historical value, for the illustration that it gives of the mode in which the Psalms were intended to be said or sung. It is as follows : "Then shall be said or sung this Psalme following (except on Easter Day, when another Anthem is appointed), one verse by the priest, and another by the people ; and the same order shall lie observed in all psalmes and hymns throughout this Book. But in coUedges, and where there is a Quire, the same shall be sung by sides, as hath bin accustomed." In the third series of his notes on the Prayer Book there are also these remarks on the response, "And our mouth shall shew forth Thy praise:" "This is the answer of all the people. In the second book of Edward VI. the word 'Choir' is everywhere put for our word ' Answer ; ' and by making this answer, they promise for themselves that they will not sit still to hear the psalms and hymns read only to them, as m.atter of their instruction ; but that they will bear a part in them with the priest, and keep up the old custom still of singing, and answering verse by vei'se, as being specially appointed for the setting forth of God's praise ; whereunto they are presently invited again by the minister in these words, 'Praise ye the Lord.' So that our manner of singing by sides, or all together, or in several parts, or in the people's answering the priest in repeating the psalms anil hymns, is here grounded ; but if the minister say all alone, in vain was it for God's people to promise God, and to say that their mouth also should shew forth His praise." [Cosm's Works, v. 445.] VENITE EXULTEMUS. This Psalm has been used from time immemorial as an intro- duction to the praises of Divine Service ; and was probably adopted by the Church from the services of the Temple.' It was perhaps such a familiar use of it in both the Jewish and the Christian system of Divine Service which led to the exposition of it given in the third chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews, where the Apostle is shewing the connection between the two dispensations, and the way in which all belief and worship centres in our Divine High Priest and perpetual Sacrifice. In one of St. Augustine's sermons he plainly refers thus to the ritual use of the Venite; "This we have g.athered from the Apostolic lesson. Then we chanted the Psalm, exhorting one another, with one voice, with one heart, saying, ' come, let us adore, and fall down before Him, and weep before the Lord Who made us. ' In the same Psalm too, ' Let us prevent His face with confession, and make a joyful noise unto Him with psalms.' After these the lesson of the Gospel shewed us the ten lepers cleansed, and one of them, a stranger, giving thanks to his cleanser." [St. Aug. Serm. Ben. ed. 176, Oxf. trans. 126.] Durandus, in his Jlationale of Divine Offices, 1 In tlio Eftstent Clmrch an epitome of tlic first tliree verses is used, but in tlic Latin aud English Cluu-elies it has always beeu used entire. i88 aborning; Iprapcr. ; iyyitatiotte. Vl b ojftttxtis, V'ulg. c L'c juravi. V'ulg. your hearts ; as in the provocation, and as in the day of temptation in the wilderness ; When your fathers tempted !Me : proved !Me, and saw My works. Forty years long was I grieved with this gene- ration, and said : It is a people that do err in their hearts, for they have not known J[y ways. Unto whom I sware in Jly wrath : that they should not enter into !My rest. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son : and to the Holy Ghost ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. "'Amen. IT Then shall follow ''the Psalms in ortler as they be appointed. And at tlie end of every Psalm throughont the Year, and likewise in the end of Bcncdkite, Benedktus, ilagnificat, and Nunc dimil- tis, shall be repeated, Glory be to the Father, and to the Sox : and to the Holy Ghost ; Answer. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever j shall be : world without end. Amen. IT Then shall be read distinctly with an andible voice ^ Sar. (Advent the First Lesson, taken out of the Old Testament, ^''" "■ '■'■■■' iay (he bet- ter hear, in such places -where they dosing, there shall the Lessons be sung ill a plain time after the nuxmter 0/ distinct r cad ill f^: and li/ieivise the lipistle and Gos- /c/iiS49->664 b except in Lent, all the which time, in (he place 0/ Te Deum shall be used Benedicite omnia opera Domini Do- luino [1540 only], <^ x>ar. Comp. Aiiti- phon to Atliaii. Creed. "Te Deum Patrem coiilite> d An Aramaic or SjTiac plural. e Clierubini et Sera- IjUim. MSS. f replenished ivith [1549 only]. g- ST. CYPRTAN, de Mortalilate, h The fair host of Martyrs that are washed white and fair in tlieir own blood praise Thee. IMirror.l t Lamp. Alnan. Creed. " Iniinensus Pater," etc. .t Thy very and ivor- shipful. IMirror.l / Th! Holy Ghost also I'fi'tg t'549 only]. but turned to the Altar, not chanting, but reading as in the tone of a reader . . . ] ^npE Deum laudamus : Te Dominum confitc- iiiur. Te seternum Pateem : omnis terra veneratnr. Tibi omnes Angeli : Tibi cceli et universas po- testates. Tibi 'Cherubin et Seraphin : iucessabili voce proclamant, Sanctus, Sanctus, Sanctus : Dominus Deus Sabaoth ; Pleni sunt cojli et terra : maje.statis gloriai Tu£e. ^Te gloriosus Apostolorum chorus. Te Prophetanim laudabilis niunerus, Te Martyrum candidatus : laudat exercitus. Te per orbem terrarum : sancta confitetur ecclesia. 'Patrem immensaj majestatis ; Venerandum Tuuni veruiu : et uuicum Filium; Sanctum quoqne Paracletuni Spiritum. Tu Hex glorias : Christe. THE CANTICLES. The ritual use of Holy Scripture in Divine Service has always been connected with praise and thanksgiving. The short responds wliicli were intermingled with the Les.son3 in the pre-Reformation Services were very ancient in their origin, although, no doubt, they had increased in number during tljo developement of the Services for monastic use. Of a like antiquity is the "Glory be to Thee, Lord," before, and the "Thanks be to Thee, O Lord," after the reading of the (iospcl in the Communion Service. As will be seen in the account given of the Te Deum, the use of responsory hymns after the Lessons is also very ancient ; and it probably arose out of the pious instinct whicli lluis connected the idea of thanksgiving with the hearing of (.iod's revelations to man. The Council of Laodicea [a. D. 3lJ7] ordered, in its seventeenth Canon, that Psalms and Lessons should be used alternately ; and this Canon doubtless refers to a custom similar to ours. A leading principle of all the Canticles ajjpears to be that of connecting the written with the personal Word of God ; and that as much in respect to the Old Testament Lessons as to those taken out of the Gospel or other parts of the New Tes- tament. This is more especially true of those Canticles which are placed first of the two in each case, the Te Deum, the Benedictus, the JLagnificat, and the Nunc Dimittis. The three latter of these were inspired hymns spoken at the time when the Eternal Word was in the act of taking our nature to redeem and glorify it ; and the first is, if not inspired, the most wonderful expression of praise for the abiding Incar- nation of our Lord that uninspired lips have ever uttered. It may also be observed that the Canticles are set where they are, not that they may apply to any particular cliapters of the Holy Bible, though they often do so in a striking manner, but with reference to Divine revelation as a whole, given to mankind by God in His mercy and love, and therefore a mat- ter for deepest thankfulness and most exalted praise. The three New Testament Canticles are all taken from the Gospel of St. Luke ; tlie sacrificial and sacerdotal gospel, the symbol of which is the "living creature like unto a calf" or "an ox ; " and in which is chieiiy set forth our Blessed Lord's relation to the Church as her High Priest offering Himself for sin, and originating from His own Person all subordinate mini.-jtrations of gr.ace. TE DEUM LAUDAMUS. This most venerable hymn has been sung by the whole Western Church "day by day" on all her feasts from time immemorial. It is found in our own Jlorning Service as far back as the Conquest ; and its insertion in tlie Salisbury riu'tiforium by St, Osmund was doubtless a continuation of the old custom of the Church of England. Very ancient ecclesiastical traditions represent the Tt Deum as a hymn antiphonally extemporized by St. Ambrose and St. Augustine at the baptism of the latter, A.D. 386. The written authority for this tradition is traceable to an alleged work of St. Datius, a successor of St. Ambrose in the See of Milan, a.d. 552. But this work has been proved by Menard, Jluratori, and Mabillon to be of much later date. There is also a Psalter in the Vienna Library, which was given by the Emperor Charlemagne to Pope Adrian I., a.d. 772, in the Appendi.K of which the Te Deum is found with the title " Hymuus quem Sanctus Ambrosius et Sanctus Augustinus invicem condiderunt : " and a similar title is found in other ancient copies. The title anciently given to it in the Psalter ef our own Church was, "Canticum Ambrosii et Augustini," and in 1661 Bishop Cosin wished so far to restore this title as to call it "The Hymn of St. Andjrose;" but the ancient rubrical title was as it is at present. In the earliest mention tliat we have of it {i.e. in the rule of St. Benedict, framed in the beginning of the sixth century), it has the same title as in our present Prayer Book, the W(jrds of St. Benedict being "Post quartum Responsoriura ineipit Abbas Te Deum Laudamus, quo prajdicto legat Abbas lectionem de Evangelio ..." It is also named in the rule of St. Cssarius of Aries about the same date ; being ordered to be sung at Mattins every Sunday in both systems. There is no reason to think that it was then new to the Church ; but we may rather conclude that it was a 'well-known hymn which the great founder of the Benedictines adopted for the iise of his order from the ordinary use of the Cliurch at large. But the authorship of this Divine hymn has been assigned to several saints both by ancient and modern authors, the earliest being St. Hilary of Poictiers, a.d. 355, and the latest, Nicetius, Bishop of Treves, A.D. 535. Some ancient copies, in the Vatican and elsewhere, give it the titles of IJi/miius S. Abunilii. and Ilijmmis Siscbuti monachi. It has also been igo aborning; IPraj^er. Thou art the everlasting Son : of the Father. When Thou tookest upon Thee to deliver man : Thou didst not abhor the Virgin's womb. When Thou hadst overcome the sharpness of death : Thou didst open the Kingdom of Heaven to all believers. Thou sittest at the right hand of God : in the Glory of the Father. *We believe that Thou shalt come : to be our Jud^e. a suscef^sti homi- nein : I'el, ad liber- andum tnnttcinm, suscepisli homi- neiii. When Thou shouldest take up- on Thee mankiucl for the deliverance of man. Thou liorridest not the Virgin's womb. [Mirror.] b We believe that Thou art the Judge that shatt conie. [Mirror.] Tu Patris sempitemus es Filius. Tu, ad liberandum, "suscepturua hominem : non horruisti Virginis uterum. Tu devicto mortis aculeo : apcruisti credenti- bus regna ccelorum. Tu ad desteram Dei sedes : in gloria Patris. Judex crederis esse venturus. attributed to St. Hilary of Aries, and to a monk of Lerins, wliose name is not known ; the number of persons named shew- ing how much uncertainty has always surrounded the matter. It is scarcely i»ssible that so remarkable a hymn should have originated in so remarkable a manner as that first referred to without some trace of it being found in the works of St. Ambrose or St. Augustine, especially the Confessions of the latter.^ It may be that their names were connected with it because the one introduced it into the Church of Milan, and the other (taught by St. Ambrose) into the Churches of Africa. For there is reason to think that the Te Deum Laudamus is much older than the time of St. Ambrose. So early as a.d. 2.52 we find the following words in St. Cyprian's Treatise " Ou the Mortality " that was then afflicting Carthage : "Ah, perfect and perpetual bliss ! There is the glorious company of the Apostles ; there is the fellowship of the prophets exulting ; there is the innumerable multitude of martyrs, crowned after their victory of strife and passion ;" and the striking parallel between them and the seventh, eightli, and ninth verses of the Te Deum seems certainly more than accidental. There are several coincidences also between words in the Baptismal and other offices of the Eastern Church and particular verses of the Te Deum, and the former are supposed to be of extremely ancient date. In the Alexandrine MS. of the Scriptures, a work of the fourth or fifth century, preserved in tlie British Museum, there is moreover a Morning Hymn which is written at the end of the Psalter, and which is still used in the daily services of the Greek Church. [.SVe also Grabe's LXX. 1709, p. 40S.] The following is a transla- tion : — ■ Glory to Thee, the Giver of light. Glory to God on high, and on earth peace, good will towards men. We praise Thee, we bless Thee, we worship Thee, we glorify Thee, we give thanks to Thee for Thy great glory. O Lord, heavenly King, God, Father Ahnighty : Lord, only-begotten Son Jesus Christ, and Holy Spirit. Lord God, Lamb of God, Son of the Father, that takest away the sin of the world ; have mercy upon us, Thou that takest away the sin of the world. Accept our prayer : Thou that sittest at the right hand of the Father, have mercy upon us. For Thou only art holy ; Thou only Lord Jesus Christ art in the glory of God the Father. Amen. Day by day I bless Thee, and praise Thy Name for ever, and for ever and ever. Vouchsafe, Lord, to keep me this day without sin. Blessed art Thou, Lord God of our fathers ; and praised and glorified be Thy Name tor ever. Amen. Lord, let Thy mercy be upon us, as our trust is in Thee. P.-i. xxxiii. 22. Blessed art Thou, Lord : teach me Thy statutes. Ts. cxix. 12. Lord, Thou hast been our refuge, from one generation to another. r.s. xc l. 1 said, Lonl, be merciful to me, heal my soul, for I have sinned against Thee. Ps. xli. 4. Lord, I lly to Thee ; teach me to do Thy will, for Thou art my God. Ps. cxliii. 0, 10. For with Thee is tlic well of life ; in Tliy light shall we see light. iv. xxxvi. 9. 1 In the latter wc raper. As He spake by the mouth of His holy Prophets : ■which have been since the world began ; That we should be saved from our enemies : and from the hands of all that hate us; To perform the mercy promised to our fore- fathers : and to remember His holy Covenant; To perform the oath which He sware to our forefather Abraham : that He would give us ; That we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies : might serve Him without fear ; In holiness and righteousness before Him : all the days of our life. And thou, child, shalt be called the Prophet of the Highest : for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare His ways ; To give knowledge of salvation unto His people : for the remission of their sins. Through the tender mercy of our God : whereby the Day-spring from on higli hath visited us ; To give light to them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow of death : and to guide our feet into the way of peace. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son : and to the Holy Ghost ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. IT "Or this Psalm. JabilateDeo. Q ^,^ t^^""^ "' ^\l ^T""' '^^ -^u v^ lands : serve the Lord with gladness, and come before His presence with a song. Be ye sure that the Loed He is God : it is He that hath made us, and not we ourselves ; we are His people, and the sheep of His pasture. go your way into His gates with thanks- giving, and into His courts with praise : be thankful unto Him, and .speak good of His Name. a Or this Psalm, to end of Gloria [.55=1- *Sar Sicut locutus est per os sanctorum : qui a sseculo sunt, prophetarum Ejus. Salutem ex inimicis nostris : et de manu omnium qui oderunt nos. Ad faciendam misericordiam cum patribus nostris : et memorari testament! Sui sancti. Jusjurandum quod juravit ad Abraham patrem nostrum : daturum Se nobis. Ut sine timore, de manu inimicorum nostroram liberati : serviamus lUi. In sanctitate et justitia coram Ipso : omnibus diebus nostris. Et tu, puer, Propheta Altissimi vocaberis : prseibis enim ante faciem Domini parare vias Ejus. Ad dandam scientiam salutis plebi Ejus : in remissionem peccatorum eorum. Per viscera misericordiaB Dei nostri : in quibus visitavit nos oriens ex alto. Illuminare his qui in tenebris et in umbra mortis sedent : ad dirigendos pedes nostros in viam pacis. Gloria Patri, et Filio : et Spiritui Sancto. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in ssecula saeculorum. Amen. Psalmus xeix. [English Version, c] * "TUBILATE Deo omnis terra : servite Domino ^ in laetitia. Introite in conspectu Ejus : in exultatione. Scitote quoniam Dominus Ipse est Deus : Ipse fecit nos, et non ipsi nos. Populus Ejus et oves pascuae Ejus, introite portas Ejus in confessione : atria Ejus in hymnis, confitemini lUi. sponsory canticle to the Gospel Lessons from very ancient times, being spoken of as so used by Am.alarius [a.d. 8'20]; and perliapa Ijy St. Benedict, nearly three centuries earlier, since he speaks of a Canlician de Kvanijdio occurring here in Mattins. In tlie Salisbury Use it occupied a similar position, but was not so definitely connected with the Lessons them- selves as it now is, being used after the Capituluni, at Lauds, on Sun(l.ay3. It was tlie only Canticle appointed for use after the second Morning Lesson in 1549, and tlie Rubric by which it is preceded shews very clearly thnt it is intended to be the ordinary Canticle, tlie Jubilate being an exceptional one, inserted to avoid repetition on St. .John Baptist's Day, or whenever the Benedictus occurs in the second Lesson itself. That it was the Canticle most used in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries is shewn by the Service-books of Cathedral choirs, in which it is much more frequently set to music than the Juliilate. The position of tliia Canticle makes its ritual meaning self- evident. It is a tliaiiksgiving to Alriiiglity (iod for His mcn^y as exhibited towards mankind in the Incarnation of our Lord, whereof the Gospel speaks, and in the found.ation of the Church in His bhiod, as recorded in the Acts of the Holy Apostles. It is the Last prophecy of the Old Di3pens.ation, anil the first of the New, and furnishes a kind of key to the Evangelical inter])retation of .all propliccics under tlic one by which they are connected with the other. Tlie I'.encdictus is a continu.al acknowledgement also of tlie Communion of Saints under tlio two iJispens.ations ; for it prjiises God for the salvation which has been raised up for all ages out of the house of His servant David, and according to the ancient covenant which He made with Abraham, "tlie father of them that believe, though they be not circumcised " [Rom. iv. 11]; whose seed all are if they are Christ's, and heirs according to the promise. [Gal. iii. 29.] The use of the Benedictus by the Church indicates to us where we are to find true synijiathy and communion with God's ancient people ; not in their out- ward relationship to Abrah.am, "for God can of these stones raise up children unto Abraham," but in their faithful acknowledgement of the Lord Jesus, as the Christ Whom the Old Testament Scriptures predicted. THE JUBILATE. This was the second of the fixed Psalms at I^auds on Sunday, and was adopted as a responsory Canticle in 15.52. The object of its insertion here was to provide a substitute for the Benedictus on d.ays wlieu tlie latter occurs in the Lesson or Gospel, on the same priiuiple whicli rules the Olllis^icln of the Venite when it occurs in the Psalms of the day. The days on which it should be used are therefore March 25th, Lady Day, and June 24th, St. .lohn Baptist's D.ay. The general substitution of the Jubilate for the Benedictus is very much to be deprecated. There is, however, a pro- phetic reference to the Chief .Shepherd of the Church, and to the service of praise ottered to llim, which makes it well fitted for occasional use, as, for example, at Easter ; and Dean Comber says that it seems to have been used after the reading of the Gospel as early as A i>. 4!>0. scorning IPrapet. 195 For the Lord is gracious, His mercy is ever- lasting : and His trutli endureth from generation to generation. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. U "Then shall be sung or said the Apostles' Creed by the Minister and the people standing: * Except only such d.ays as the Creed of Saint Alhanasius is appointed to be read. I BELIEVE in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth. And in Jesus Christ His only Son our Lord, Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, Born of the Virgin Mary, Suffered under Pontius Pilate, Was crucified, dead, and buried. He descended into hell ; The third day He rose again from the dead. He ascended into heaven, And sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty ; From thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost ; The holy Catholic Church ; The Communion of Saints ; The Forgiveness of sins ; The Eesurrection of the body, And the Life everlasting. 'Ameii. a The Creed was preceiled by the Doiitttiiis vobts- ni'it, and followed by Ilie Lord's Prayer in 1549. b Except , . . read [1662I. c Tile Apostles' Creed is here writ- ten as one para- graph in the Mb., But divided into three paragraphs in the Sealed Books << Sor. e Italic in MS. Laudato DOMINUS, usque in Ejus. Gloria Patri, et Filio : et Spiritui Sancto nomen Ejus, quoniam suavis est in seternum misericordia Ejus : et generationem et generationem Veritas Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper : et in ssBcula SKCuloruni. Amen. Symbohim Apostolicum. "'/^REDO in Deum Pateem Omnipotentem, v-^ Creatorem ccsli et terrie. Et in Jesum Christum Filium Ejus unicum, Dominum nos- trum : Qui conceptus est de Spikitu Sancto, natus ex Maria Virgine, passus sub Pontic Pilato, crucifixus, mortuus, et sepultus : descendit ad inferna : tertia die resurrexit a mortuis : ascendit ad coelos : sedet ad dexteram Dei Patkis Omni- potentis : inde venturus est judicare vivos et mortuos. Credo in Spiritum Sanctum : sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam : Sanctorum nem, remissionem peccatorum communio- carnis resurrec- tionem, et vitam teternam. Amen. THE APOSTLES' CEEED. The use of a Creed in Divine Service is of very ancient origin, dating at least from the time of Peter the Fuller, about a. D. 470, and the Apostles' Creed has been used in the Daily Offices of the Church of England as far back as they can be traced. Under the old system it folio-wed the Lord's Prayer (instead of preceding it) at Prime and Compline, and was recited in the same manner, the people joining in only at a repetition of the last two clauses. In the Reformed Breviary of Cardinal Quignonez an open recitation of the Apostles' Creed was directed on all days except Sunday : and this direction probably suggested our present custom. The earliest occurrence of the Apostles' Creed exactly in the form ill which we now use it at Morning and Evening Prayer, is in a treatise published by Mabillou, from an ancient MS., entitled " Libellus Pirmiiiii de singulis libris canonicis scarapsus," or "scriptus. " Pirminius died about a. D. 758, and appears to have lived some time in France, though he died in Germany. Hence it is extremely probable that the Creed contained in two several places of his treatise, and in both places in the same words, is the old Gallican form of the Apostles' Creed, identical with that afterwards adopted by St. Osmund into the Salisbury Use, from the more ancient services of the Church of England. How much older than the eighth century this exact form of the Apostles' Creed may be is not kuuwu ; but it has been so used, without variation, in the whole Latin Church, as well as in the Church of Eng- land, from that time until the present. The substance of the Apostles' Creed is, however, very much older. It is extant, very nearly as we now use it, as it was used by the Churches (if Aquileia and Rome at the end of the fourth century, when it was commented upon, and botli forms indicated, by Rufinus, who was a priest of the former diocese. The two forms are here shewn side by side, the authority for each being Heurtley's Harmonia Symbollca, pp. 26, 30 :— Tke Creed of the C'lnirrh of The Creed of the CImrch of Aquileia, circ. a.d. 390. Home, circ. a.d. 390. Pilato, et sepultus ; Descendit in inferna; Tertia die resur- rexit a mortuis ; Ascendit in c^los ; Sedet ad dexteram Pa- tris. Inde venturus est judi- care vivos et mortuos; Et in Spiritu Sancto;' Sanctam Ecclesiam ; Remissionem pec- catorum; Hujus carnis resur- rectionem. resurrexit a mortuis. Ascendit in caelos ; Sedet ad dexteram Patris ; Inde venturus est judi- care vivos et mortuos ; Et in Spiritu Sancto ; Sanctam Ec- clesiam ; Remissionem peccato- rum ; Carnis resurrectionem. Credo in Deum Patrem om- nipotentem, invisibilem et im- passibilem : Et in Jesum Chris- tum, unicum Filium ejus, Do- minum nostrum : Qui natus est de Spiritu Sancto Ex Maria Virgine ; Cruciiixus sub Pontio Credo in Deum Patrem om- nipotentem. Et in Jesum Christum, unicum Filium ejus, Dominuu) nostrum ; Qui natus est de Spiritu Sancto Ex Maria Virgine ; Crucifixus sub Pontio Pilato, et sepultus ; Tertia die At a still earlier period, a.d. ISO, Irenjeus wrote his great work against heresies ; for, even at that early date, these began to fulfil the prophecy of our Lord that the Enemy should sow tares among the wheat. In this book Ireuteus gives the sub- stance of Christian doctrine under the name of the ' ' Rule of Truth," which every Christian acknowledged at his Baptism. This undoubtedly represents the Apostles' Creed, though probabljr not the exact words in which it was recited. The Creed as stated by Irenaxis, Bishop of Lyons, a.d. 180. The Church throughout the world, spread out as she is to the ends of the earth, carefully preserves the faith that she received from the Apostles and from their disciples : — Believing in one God the Father Almighty, Who made Heaven and Earth, the seas, and all that in them is ; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, Who was incarnate for our salvation ; and in the Holy Ghost, Who by the prophets pro- claimed the dispensations and the advents of our dear Lord, Christ Jesus ; and His birth of a Virgin, and His suffering, and His Resurrection from the dead ; and the Ascension in the flesh into Heaven of the beloved Christ Jesus our Lord, and His coming from Heaven in the glory of the Father, to sum up all things, and to raise up all flesh of the whole human race. That to Christ Jesus our Lord, and God, and Saviour, and King, according to the good pleasure of the invisible Father, every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the e.arth ; and that every tongue should confess Him, and that He should pass righteous judge- ment upon all. That He may send spiritual wickednesses, and the angels who transgressed, and fell into apostasy, and the ungodly, and the unjust, and the lawless, and the blas- 1 This is the reading in most MS. .luthorities. It is retained in the Bene- dictine edition of St, Jerome's works, by Erasmus, and by Routh. It apiiears also iu other Latin Creeds, 196 Qgorning Iprager. pliemers among men, into eternal fire : but that on the right- eous, and the holy, and those wlio have kept His command- ments and persevered in His love, some from the beginning and some from the time of their repentance, granting the grace of life He may grant immortality, and surround them with eternal glory. [Iren. agt. Hens. i. 10.] In two otlier parts of the samework there are othersummaries of the Creed which are plainly based on tlie same formula as that of which the above contains a parajihrastic statement. [Iren\ aijt. Heres. iii. i, iv. 33.] Traces of tlie Creed are also to be found in the writings of Justin Martyr, Polycarp, Clemens Romamis, and Ignatius : and these approach so near to Apostolic times as to give good reason to think that the name by wliich the Apostles' Creed has been known for many centuries is one which belongs to it not merely because it accurately states the faith held by the Apostles, but also because it originated from them. A very ancient tradition of the Church, as old as the time of Rufinus [.i.D. 369-410], describes the Apostles as meeting together to consider about a common statement of doctrine before they parted for their several labours. A later tradition (attributed to St. Augustine, but probably of more recent date> adds to this statement that each Apostle in succession recited one Article of the Creed, implying that it was thus delivered by Inspiration. The first of these traditions, writ- ten down so near to the time of the Apostles, is worthy of great respect : and no objections liave been made to it which liave not been rationally answered. The second is not of higli authenticity, but tlie objections brought against it are chiefly founded on the improbabiUty of such a state- ment being true : yet if the inspiration of the Apostles for the purpose of writing special official letters is granted, it is difficult to see what there is improbable in a statement that implies their collective inspiration for the pui-pose of origin- ating so important a document as tlie Creed, at a time when the New Testament Scriptures had not yet come into existence. But, apart from these traditions, there is much evidence in the early Christian writings that there was a common and well-known formula containing the chief articles of Christian faith There are also frequent statements that the tradition of the Faith came direct from the Apostles. Combining these facts with the supposition that the Apostles would almost certainly provide some such formula for the guidance of con- verts, we may conclude that it is far more reasonable to believe the Creed going under their name to be substantially of their composition than to believe the contrary. In fact, the Creed appears to be an absolute necessity, springing out of the circumstances in which the early Christians were placed : when, as regarded themselves, their brethren, and the Heathen, such an answer to the question, " What is Christianity ? " resolving itself into a few short replies embodying the chief facts of our Lord's life and work, was imperatively required. That the Apostles would methodize an authoritative form of this reply can hardly be doubted ; and that they did so is more than suggested by what St. Paul says of a Form of sound words in passages like Rom. i. 3, vi. 1", x. 9, xii. 6. xvi. 17 ; Heb. x. 23; Phil. iii. 16; 2 Tim. i. 13, the original Greek of which almost necessitates such an interpretation as that here indicated. Although, however, the cumulative force of these arguments is so great as to leave scarcely any rational ground for contra- dicting the old belief of the Church that the Creed came from the Apostles substaiitiallj' as it was handed down to the eighth century, it is not sufficient to warrant us in declaring it to be inspired. All that we may dare to sa}' on this point is, that the Apostles were under a very special guidance of the Holy Ghost, were "filled with the Spirit " for the official purposes of their work ; and, consequently, that very little of the human element is likely to have mingled itself with any of the official words which they spoke to the Church. If it could be certainly proved that the Creed came from the Apostles as we now have it, sound reason would require us to believe that the Holy Ghost moved them to compose it, and hence that it was inspired. In the absence of such evi- dence it is our dutj' to compare the doctrines handed down to us in the Creed as those of the Apostles, with the doctrines contained in the great storehouse of God's Truth. In the following Table it will be seen how near an agreement there is between the statements contained in the Creed and those made by the Apostles in their early missionary work : ' — Statements of Apostles, 1 „„. 4v„ '•'-h-i^nf- i -hi" God the Son. God the Holy Ghost. Our Lord's Sufferings Our Lord's Resurrec- tion. 0«rLord'slO"s^^^>;-f Ascension, comtog. Repent- ance. Forgive- ness of Sins. The Church. 19, 20 49 Acts i. 8 St. Matthew xxviii. 19 19 19 10 St. Luke xxiv. 49 49 49 Acts i.4,8 46 46 51 Acts i. 9 Acts i. 11 47 47 St. John XX. 17 17 22 9, 20, 28 17 xxi. 22 XX. 23 21,23 St. Peter, Acts ii. 17 22, 23, 24 17, 33, 38 23 24, 31, 32 [Mark xvi. 19.] 33 38 38 32 Acts iii. 13 13, 15 15 15 21 19-21 19,26 19 15 Acts iv. 24 12, 27, 30 10, 27 10 Acts V. 30 31 32 30 30 31 31 31 32 Acts X. 34-36 38 38 39 40, 41 42 43 41, 42 31 St. Stephen, Acts vii. 2, 32, 37, 55 52, 55 51 52 55, 56 55, 56 St. Paul, Acts xiii. 17, 23 23, 33, 35 28 30, 33, 34, 37 38 Ileb. vi. 1 1,6 4 6 2 1, 6 Such a coincidence coes far towards shewing that the Apostles' Creed is a "rorm of sound words" handed down to U8 on the very highest authority. It may also convince >is that it would be an irreverent and uncritical error to speak of it positively as a human composition. The central position of the Creed in our Morning and Kven- ing Service gives it a twofold ritual aspect. Praise lias formed the distinctive feature of what has gone before, prayer 1 TIarvev oi\ thr Crfnh. i. 20. ^ocniiiB Iprayer. 197 forms that of what is to follow. The cimfossiou of our Christian faith in the Creed is tlierefore [1] like a summing up of the Scriptures that have been used for the praise of Goil and the editieation of His Church : and by its recitation we acknowledge that it is "Him first, Him last, Him mitlst, aiKl without eii'l," Whom we find in Moses, the Prophets, the Psalms, the Gospels, and the Epistles. Not only in respect to ourselves, as a tit reminder of this great truth, do we tlius confess our faith, but also to the praise of God ; and hence the Rubric directs the Creed to be "sung" (the word was inserted by Bishop Cosin), if circumstances will permit, as the Nicene Creed and the Athanasian Creed always have been. And [2] the recitation of the Creed is a confession of that objective faith which alone can give full reality to prayer ; hence it is a foundation of, and introduction to, the Preces and the Collects with which the .Service concludes. "For this reason it is, probably, that baptisms were ordered to take place after the second lesson ; that so the admission of tlio newly liaptized might be followed by litiinjictd avowal, so to speak, of that Creed, and saying of that Prayer, whicli, as a part of the rite, have already been avowed and used. " ' There are two customs connected with the recitation of the Creed which require notice ; the one, that of turning to the East, or towards the Altar, as representing the East, in say- ing it ; the other, that of bowing at the holy Name of Jesus. Both of these customs are relics of habits which have only ceased to be universal (in the English Church, at leasts in very modern times. Clergy and people used formerly to look one way througli- out the Prayers and Creeds, that is, towards the Altar. " In some churches," writes Thorndike,- "the desk for the Prayer Book looks towards the Chancel ; anj for reading of Lessons we are directed to look towards the people. As the ■lews in their jn-ayers looked towards the Mercy-seat or prin- cipal part of the Temple [Ps. xxviii. 2], so Christians looked towards the Altar or chief part of the church, whereof their Mercy-seat was but a type. Christ in His prayer directs us to Heaven, though God be everywhere ; for Heaven is His throne, and we look toward that part of the church which most resembles it. Herein we correspond to the Jewish practice. ' Before reading-desks were erected in the naves of churches, the prayers were said in front of the Altar itself, as may be seen in old prints ; while tlie Psalms were sung in the choir stalls ; and this was a continuation of the ancient practice,^ the officiating clergyman always standing or kneeling in the former place to say Creeds and Pi'ayers. When pews as well as reading-desks sprang up in churches, both congrega- tion and clergy were often placed in any position that suited the convenience of the carpenter ; but reverence still impelled all to turn towards the Altar during the solemn Confession of their Faith. Hence this habit became exceptional and prominent instead of habitual ; and exceptional reasons were alleged in support of it, wlien in fact they applied, with more or less force, to the general posture of the worshipper in God's House, as expressed in the preceding extract. Apart, also, from symbolical explanations of this custom, it appeals to both the reason and the feelings, by forming the congrega- tion into a body of which the clergyman is the leader, as when a regiment marches into battle, or parades before its Sovereign headed by its officers : and there is no part of Divine Service where this relation of priest and people is more appropriate than in the open Confession of Christian Faith before God and man. Bowing at the holy Name of out Lord's Human Nature is also an usage of general application, and was never intended to be restricted to the Creed, although its omission there would certainly be a more special dishonour to Him than elsewhere. When Puritan superstition sprang up in the six- teenth century, the usage began to be dropped by many who were seduced by controversy into greater respect for doctrines of slighter importance than for that of our Lord's Divinity. The Church then made a law on the subject of reverent gestures in Divine Service, in the ISth Canon of 1603 ; in which (after ordering that all shall stand at the Creed) is the following clause, founded on the 52nd of Queen Elizabeth's 1 Freeman's Pihiciples of Divine Service, i. 301. - Thorndike's Religiouti Assemblies, p. 231. 3 The exact routine of the ancient practice may be seen in "^ Of the turning of the Choir to the Altar," one among sevei-al extract* from tlie Consuetudinary of Sarum, printed at tlie end of Chambers' I'mnslalion 0/ the Samm Fsoltcr, ]i. i?A. Injunctions, issued in ISiJO : "And likewise, when in time of Divine Service the Lord Jesus shall be mentioned, due and lowly reverence shall be done ]>y all jiersons present, as hath been accustomed : testifying by these outward ceremonies and gestures tlieir . . . due acknowledgement that the Lord .lesus Christ, tlie true and eternal .Son of God, is the only Saviour of the world, in Whom all the mercies, graces, and promises of God to mankind, for this life, and the life to come, are fully and wholly comprised." This general rule of the Church, and the explanation thus authoritatively given, apply with .such special force to the use of this gesture in the (,'reed that nothing further need be added on the subject. ■* § A /I Expositor ij Parap/iirme nf the Apostles' Creed. Ifor myself, as personally responsible for my faith to God J and His Church, openly profess, to His glory, tliat I believe, from my heart, with the assent of my reason and the submission of my will. In God the Father, by a mysterious, unintelligible manner of paternity. Father of the uncreated, co-equal, and co- eternal Son : Father also of all the regenerated, by their adoption through His tlius only-begotten Son : Almighty, so that notliing is beyond His power which is con- sistent with goodness ; knowing all things p.ist, present, and to come ; exercising authority over all things and persons, and upholding all things by His universal and omnipresent Providence ; I believe that He was and is the Maker, that is, the original Creator of the original matter, and the Disposer of that material in lit order, of heaven, wliich comprehends all that has originally occu- pied space beyond this world, and earth, which comprehends all organic and inorganic beings and substances within the compass of this world. And I equally believe In Jesus, perfect Man, in all tlie qualities of human nature, Christ, anointed to be the Saviour of the world, the High Priest of a new order of priesthood, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Hia only Son, etern.ally begotten, and therefore having such a Sonship as none others who call God Father can possess, our Lord, being God, the Second Person in the Blessed Trinity, as well as Man ; Lord of all by His Divine Nature, Lord of the Church by His work of Redemption. Thus I believe in the Eternal Son of the Eternal Father, in a Saviour Divine and Human, ■Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, through a mysterious and unintelligible operation, which miraculously super- seded the ordinary law of nature, so that the Holy Child Jesus was Born of the 'Virgin Mary, a holy maiden, who thus miracu- lously became His mother that He, being born of a Virgin and not of a wife, might be free from the sin of our common origin, which is conveyed from parent to child by natural conception. Being thus born in our nature, but without our sin. He bore it as His own through infancy, childhood, and mature manhood ; and when the time M'as fully come. He offered it as a sacrifice for our sins when He Suffered under Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor of Judsea and Jerusalem, and ■Was crucified, by being nailed alive to a cross of wood, set upright in the ground. Being thus crucified. His suffer- ings were the greatest that had ever befallen any man, being aggravated by the burden of sin which He, though innocent, was bearing for our sakes. Not through the intensity of His sufferings, but of His own will. He gave up His life when all -was accomplished that could be by His pains, and then became dead, through the separation of His Soul from His Body, in the same manner as human beings ordinarily become so. Being dead. His holy Body, still the Body of the Son of God, was taken down from the cross, * On April 2S, 1662, "A proviso for bein^ uncovered and for using reverent gestures at tlie time of Divine Service was twice read. "But the matter being held proper for the Convocation, " Ordered— That such persons as shall be employed to ntanage the Confer- ence with the Lords, do intimate the desire of tliis House that it be recom- mended to the Convocation to take order for reverent and uniform gestures vriting, " Because there is none other that saveth us from our enemies, but only Thou, O God." The alteration was not approved by the Revision Committee, and was erased. * The same order is to be founil in old formularies : f.;/. in the Sacra- raentary of Grimoldtis, printed by Pamelius in his Litnnjiam, i. 511, where there is a Benedictio super Regem tempore ^ynodi, followed by one for the Clergy and people. devotional recognition to the common work in which Priest and Laity are engaged, and tlie common fellowship in which it is being done. The same salutation is used in the Confirma- tion Service, after the Act of Confirmation, and before the Lord's Prayer : but in this case the lesser Litany is not connected with it. The constant use of this mutual Bene- diction or Salutation should be a continual reminder to the laity of the position which they occupy in respect to Divine Service : and that, although a separate order of priesthood is essential for the ministration of God's worship, yet there is a priesthood of the Laity by right of which they take part in that worship, assuming their full Christian privilege, and making it a full corporate offering of the whole Christian body. Nor should we forget, in connection with it, the pro- mise, " Lo, I am with you alway, even to the end of the world." The lesser Litany is au ancient and Catholic prefix to the Lord's Prayer, which is only used without it in the celebra- tion of the Holy Communion, the Administration of Baptism, and in Confirmation, and at the beginning of Morning and Evening Prayer. In the latter case its omission is supplied by the Confession : in the others the use of the Lord's Prayer is Euch.aristic, as will be shewn in the notes appended to it in the Communion Service. In this part of his Prayer Book Bishop Cosin added the second recitation of each versicle as an "Ansiver,' so as to make the lesser Litany here identical with that in the Litany itself. This probably represents the proper way of using it in Divine Service, as it was thus repeated three times in the Salisbury Use. In its original form this lesser Litany consisted of Kyrie Eleison nine times repeated : but the Western Church has alwaj's used Christe Eleison as tlie second versicle. Its threefold form is analogous to that of the Litany, which opens with separate prayers to each Person of the Blessed Trinity. ■* This form renders it a most fitting introduction to the Lord's Prayer : and the Clmrch has so distinctly adopted the lesser Litany for that purpose, that we may well feel a reverent obligation to use it on all occasions when the Lord's Pr.ayer is said. Such an usage appeals, too, to the instinct of Christian humility, which shrinks from speaking to God even in the words t.aught us by our Lord, without asking His mercy on our act of prayer, influenced, as it must needs be, by the infirmities of our nature, and imperfect as it must appear to the aU-pene- trating Eye. The Lord's Prayer, as used in this place, has a different intention from that with which it was used at the opening of the Service, and is by no means to be looked upon as an accidental repetition arising from the condensation of several shorter services into one longer. In the former place it was used with reference to the Service of Praise ami Prayer in which the Church is engaged. Here it is used with reference to the necessities of the Church for the coming day ; preceding the detailed prayers of the versicles which follow, and of the Collects which make up the remainder of the Service. Then the Priest standing up shall sa;/] This Rubric con- tinues the ancient practice, applying it to the whole of the * The Mir>-or also explains the triple repetition of each Kyrie as a prayer in each case against sins of thought, word, ancl deed. 200 QgorninQ ll^tager. Answer. And make Tliy chosen people joyful. Et saucti Tui exulteut. Priest. " Lord, save Thy people. a Pi. aS. 9, Salvum fac populum Tuum, Dojiine. Answer. And bless Thine Inheritance. Et benedic hasreditati Tuse. Priest. *Give peace in our time, Lord. * 2 Kings 20. 19. Ps. [Da pacem, Domine, in diebus uostris. Answer. ^[Antiph. to Collect for Peace.] Because there is none other that fighteth for us, Quia non est alius qui pugiiet pro nobis nisi but only Thou, God." (/Ps. 29. 11.&60. 11. 2 Chron. 32. 8. Tu, Belts noster.] Priest. ' God, make clean our hearts within us. e P->. 51. 10, 11. /(Ps. Miserere itiei Deus.J ^ [Cor mundum crea in me, Domine. Answer. 'And take not Thy Holy Spirit from us. g Gen. 6, 3. Rom. 8.9. Et Spieitdm Sanctum Tuum ne auferaa a me.] versicles, instead of only to a portion. ' The old Rubric after the Miserere, which followed the versicles above given, was " Finito Psalrao solus sacerdos erigat se, et ad gradum chori accedat ad JIatutinas et ad Vesperas, tunc dicendo hos ver- sus : — Exurge, Domine, adjuva uos Et libera nos propter nomen tuum. Domine Deus virtu turn, converte nos. Et ostende faciem tuam, et salvi erimus. Domine, exaudi orationem meam. Et clamor meus ad te veniat. Dominus vobiscum. Et cum spiritu tuo. Oremus. [Dcindc dkUur Oratlo 2>roprio.. . . .]" From this it appears that the collect, as well as the versicles, were to be said standing. In the ilS. of the Prayer Book the Rubric was originally written, " Tlicn the Priest standing up, and 80 continuinrj to the end of the Service;" but the latter words were erased by a later liand, and are not in the Sealed Books. The intentiou of the Refomiers seems indeed to have been that, throughout the Prayer Book, the Priest should kneel with the people in confessions and penitential prayers, but stand, as in the Communion Office, while ofl'eriug all other prayers. That the practice of standing continued to be observed in the middle of the seventeenth century is shewn by the question which Baxter asked in 1660, " Why doth the Minister stand in prayer, even in the Sacrament prayer, while the people kneel ? " [B.iXTEit's Defence of the Proposed.-i, etc., § .30.] But this posture has been almost universally set aside in Morning and Evening Prayer, except during the recitation of these vei'sicles ; and its revival M'ould be repug- nant to natural feelings of liumility. It was originally ordered as a sign of the autlioritative position which the Priest occupied as the representative of the Cliurch ; and official gestures ought not to be ruled by personal feeling. But at the same time the established usage makes a good ritual distinction between the prayers of the ordinary offices and those of the Eucliaristic Service. The same great truth as to the priesthood of the Laity, which has already been referred to, is again brought out strongly in the versicle and response, " Endue Thy ministers with righteousness : And make Thy chonen pieople joyful." It is impossible not to identify the latter words, in their Christian sense, with the words of St. Peter, "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priestliood, an holy nation, a pecu- liar people, UuU ye Khould shoe forth the praises of Him Wliii hath called you out of darkness into His marvellous light ; " and in a preceding verse of the same chapter, " Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priest- hood, to otler up spiritual .sacrihces acceptable to God by Jesus Christ." [1 Pet. ii. 5, 9.] This subject is treated of at greater I But, as a gciiernl nilc, " Preces*' were HAid kneeling (cxccjit at Clirittt- inas, anil from Easter to Trinity), anil "Onitloncn" were said staniling. I length in the notes on the Confirmation Service ; but the doc- trine, or rather the practice of the doctrine, pervades the Prayer Book ; the whole system of responsi\e worship being founded upon it. .SVe also a note on the "Amen" of the Laity at the consecration of the Blessed Sacrament. It is a happy ritual accident that the Suffrages give the key- notes of the Collects and Prayers which follow. The fast couplet indicating the Collect of the Day, always a general prayer for mercy and salvation ; the second the Prayer for the Queen ; the tJiird and fourth couplets the Prayer for the Clergy and People ; thejifth the Morning and Evening Collects for Peace and Against all perils ; and the sixth couplet the Collect for Grace to live well. THE THREE COLLECTS. All kneelintj] See the preceding remarks on this posture in the Preces. It is only necessaiy here to add that the words, " The Priest standing up, and sailing. Let us pray. IT Then the Collect of the Day," followed'those of the present Rubric until 1552, representing the old usage of the Church. As this direction was thromi further back, and no direction for the Priest to kneel inserted in its place here, the Eubric appears to order the same posture at the versicles and the collects, as has been already shewn. § The First Collect, of the Day. The central point of all Divine Worship, towards which all otlier services gravitate, and around which they revolve, like planets round a sun, is the great sacrificial act of the Church, the offering of the Holy Sacrament. The ordinary services of Mattins and Evensong are therefore connected ^\ith it rituaUy l)y the use of the collect " tliat is appointed at the Communion," to which precedence is given over all other prayers except the Lord's Prayer, and the versicles from Holy Scripture. This collect is the oidy variable prayer of the Coni- iiuiniou Office, and it is almost always built up out of the ideas contained in the Epistle and Gospel appi'inted for the Sunday or other Holyday to which it specially belongs ; these latter, again [see Introduction to Collects, etc.], being selections of most venerable antiquity, intended to set a definite and dis- tinctive mark on the 3-1 is the follow- ing advertisement: 'That every Incumbent or Curate endeavour (.as far forth as he can), especially in market towns, to read short Morning Prayers at six o'clock before men go to their labours.' In 1640 it is rather varied: 'That short Morning Prayers be read in market towns, and in all other places where conveniently it may be.'" [Latubuuy's hist. /'. Book, p. 16,T] THE FIVE PRAYERS, These prayers were inserted in this place in 1001, apparently at the suggestion of Bishop Cosin made in his Amended Prayer Book. Some of them had been previously in use in Q^omintj Prayer. 203 and walk in Thy way : Endue her plenteously with heavenly gifts ; grant her in health and wealth lung to live ; strengthen her that she may vanquish and overcome all her enemies ; and finally, after this life, she may attain everlasting joy and felicity ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. the Litany or in Occasional Offices. To a certain extent they represent some private prayers used by the Clergy, after the public Office was over in tlie ancient system of tlie Cliurch [Freeman, i. 371]; but this parallel is accidental, as an interval of more than a century had elapsed between the cessation of the old custom, and its revival in the present form. There are, however, several pages of Mi-moricc ComniHiH'S in the Salisbury Missals, and among these may be found the original idea, though not the ipsistiima rerha, of the four intercessory prayers here used, and also of several of those called ' ' Occasional. " The Memorhe Commimes were, in fact, ' ' Prayers and Thanksgivings upon Several Occasions ; " and the four intercessory prayers now used daily seem to have been originally considered as belonging to this class. It is noticeable that the ancient structural form of the Collect [seK Introduction to Collects, etc.] has been carefully adopted in these prayers, as it was in the case of the daily Absolution. § The rraijcr for the Queen. This occurs fiist in two books of Private Prayers, the one entitled Psalmes or Prayers taki'ii out of Holye Scripture [1545-48], the other, Prayers or Meditations . . . collected out of holy works by the most rirluous and gracious Prijtcess Kiitheriiie, Queen of Emjland, France, and Ireland. Anno ilni 1547. It was also inserted in the Morning Prayer, ])rinted in the Prymer of 153.'?, as the "Fourth Collect." In Queen Elizabeth's reign [155'J] it was placed with other prayers and in its present shape before tlie Prayer of St. Chrysiistom at the end of the Litany. Our present usage was first adopted in the Form of Prayer for March 24, 1G04, commemorating the entry of James I. into England. It was inserted in the Scottish Prayer Book of 1637, and finally settled as we now have it in 16G1. It is not known who was the author of this fine composition, the opening of which is equal in grandeur to anything of the kind in the ancient Liturgies ; breathing indeed the spirit of the Tersanctus and Trisagion. A prayer for tlie Sovereign is a very ancient part of Divine Service, the Apostolic use of it being evidenced beyond doubt by the words of St. Paul in the opening of the second chapter of his First Epistle to Timothy, "I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men ; for kings, and for all that are in authority ; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty." The "giving of thanks " being an expression for the offering of the Holy Eucharist, this injunction ought to be taken as containing a reference to tlie use of such an intercession at the ordinary prayers of the Church, as well as at the Holy Communion. A Missa pro Reije is contained in the Sacramentary of St. Gregory [see foot- note beyond] as early as the sixth century. In the ecclesiasti- cal laws of King Ethelred, a.d. lOl'i, the third chapter con- tains express directions that a certain prayer should be said daily for the King and his people ; and the practice of the Church of England before the Reformation has already been mentioned. It may be useful to place in connection with our now familiar Prayer for the Sovereign, one from an Eastern Liturgy, and the Memorial of the Salisbury Breviary, the syxte, and so replenysshe hym with the grace of thy holy sjiirite, that he alway incline to thy wil, and walke in thy ■way. Kepe hym farre of from ignoraunce, but through thy gifto, leat prudence and knowlage alwaio abound in his royall hert. So instructe hym (o Lord iesv), reygnyng upon us in erth, that his humaino majestee, alway obey thy divine majestee in feare and drede. Indue him plentifully ■with heauenly geftes. Grant him in health and welth long to liue. Heape glorie and honourc upon liym. Glad hym ■with the joye of thy counten- ance. So strengthe liym, that he male vanquish and ouercome all his and our foes, and lie dread and feared of al the ennemies of his realme. [And finally, after this life that he may attain everlasting joy and felicity. Prymer Version.^ Amen.^ From the Liturgy of St. Mark. "0 Lord, Master and God, the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ ; we beseech Thee to preserve our king in peace, might, and rigliteousness. Subdue under him, G(id, his foes and all that hate him. Lay hold upon the shield and buckler, and stand up tn help him. Grant victories unto him, God, and that he may be peaceably disposed both towards us and towards Thy holy Name ; and tliat we also, in the peace of his days, may lead a quiet and peaceable life, in all godliness and honesty, through the grace, mercy, and loving- kindness of Thine only-begotten Son ; through Whom, and with AVhom, be glory and power unto Thee, ^\ith Thine all- holy, good, and life-giving Spirit, now and for ever, and unto all eternity. Amen." "memori.b pro rege et reoina. [From the Salishury Missal.] Oratio. " Deus in cujus manu sunt corda regum : qui es humilium Consolator, et fidelium Fortitude, et Protector omnium in Te sperantium : da regi nostro fi. et reginse nostra; fl. populoque C'hristiano triumphum virtutis tuje scienter excolere : ut per Te semper repareutur ad veniam. Per Domiuum. Secreta. Suscipe, quipsumus, Domine, preces et hostias ecclesite Tuie, quas pro salute famuli Tui regis nostri et regiuie et pro- tectione fidelium jiopulorum Tua> Majestati ofi'erimus : suppli- cantes ut antiqua brachii tui Te operante miracula, superatis inimicis, secura tibi serviat Christianoruin libertas. Per Dominum. Post-Cornmunio. " Pra;sta, quffisumus, Omnipotens Deus : ut per hsec niysteria sancta quaj sumpsimus, rex noster et regiua, popu- hisque Christianus semper rationabilia meditantes qUi-e Tibi placita sunt, et dictis exequantur et factis. Per Dominum.'' These are taken from a Missal of 1514 ; another set, men- tioning the name of Henry VII., are given by Mr. Maskell in his Ancient Liturgy, p. 278. The Post-Communion of the latter ends with the words "et post hujus vita; decursum ad seternam beatitudinem, tua gratia cooperante, perveniat ; " ■which are evidently the original of "And finally after this life, she may attain everlasting joy and felicity." See also the note below. I The final claii.se nf this prayer is t-iken from tlie Post-Commiiiiion of a Misaa Quotidialia pro Rege in the Sacraineutary of St. Gregory, which is as follows : — "Ila'C, Dnniine, oratio saUitiris faniuhiin tuuin, IIl[um = fl. or Cl.], ah omnibus tueatur adversis, quateiuis et tcclesiastic;e pacts obtineat tran- quillitatem, et post istius teniporis decursum ad leteruani perveuiat hare- ditatem. Per." [Greg. Miss. Quotid. pro Rege. Ad Complefuivm.} The earlier part of it bears some resemblance to the beginning of the Consecratio Regis, printed at p. 279 in the Appendix to Menard's -Soci-a- vtentary of .St. Gregoi-tj. *' Omnipotens sempitenie Deus, Creator et Gubernator coeli et terrte, Conditor et Dispositor Angelonun et liomiuum. Rex regum et Doininius dominorum, qui," etc. 204 ^ocnincj ipraj)er. T A Prayer for the Royal Family. ALMIGHTY God, the Fountain of all good- -^^J^ uess, we humbly beseech Thee to bless Albert Edivard Prince of Wales, the Princess of Wales, and all the Eoyal Family ; Endue them with Thy Holy Spikit ; enrich them with Thy heavenly grace ; prosper them with all happiness ; and bring them to Thine everlasting kingdom^; through Jesus Cheist our Lokd. Amen. IT A Prayer for the Clergy and People AL^MIGHTY and everlasting God, Who alone -^^^ workest great marvels ; Send down upon our Bishops, and Curates, and all Congregations committed to their charge, the healthful Spirit of Thy grace ; and that they may truly please Thee, pour upon them the continual dew of Thy bless- ing. Grant this, O Lord, for the honour of our Advocate and Mediator, Jesus Christ. Amen. •^ A Prayer of .St. Chrysontom. ALMIGHTY God, Who ha.st given us grace at ^» this time with one accord to make our common supplications unto Thee ; and dost pro- 1 mise, that when two or three are gathered j , ciminon Prayer " ALMIGHTY God, which host promissd to bee Book of ,604. J^ ^ p^jjjgj. p^ ^Jjjjjg Tgjg^.^^ ^^^ ^^ ^Jjgjj. , seed : We humbly beseech thee to blesse our Noble Prince Charles, Fredericke the Prince I Elector Palatine, and the lady Elisabeth his wife : endue them with thy holy Spirit, enrich them with thy heavenly grace, prosper them with all happinesse, and bring them to thine everlasting kingdome, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. * Sar. Greg. Missa "/^MNIPOTENS sempiterne Deus, Qui facis coSgT^pS. g|! j ^~-^ mirabilia magna solus: prstende super 7^7. " "'■ '■ '"'' famulos Tuos Pontifiees et super cunctas congre- gationes illis commissasSpiritumgratiaesalutaris; et ut in veritate Tibi complaceant, perpetuum eis rorem Tuae benedictionis infunde. c Liturgy of Con- I TttS KOtl'tt^ Tttl'TaS Kat (TVlXihhiVOVi Vl^-^i' VttPtO"- stant Prayer of 1 , , , x r, v v . '^ "^i third Anthem. ' autl'OS TTpoCTeVYaS, O Kat Ol'0"t Kat, TpLtTl t(^. ed tSS:.] c Prymer Version of fourteenth century, [jl/. R. iii, 3.J ft The first two ver- sicles were inserted here in 1552. ''[Here bygynuetli the pater noster. OURE fadir, that art in heuenes, halewid be thi name : thy rowme come to thee : be thi wille do as in heuene and in erthe : oure eche dales breed jyue us to day : and forjyue us oure dettis, as and we for3euen to oure dettouris : and ne lede us into temptacioun ; but delyuere us fro yuel. So be it.] '■[Domine, Labia. Lord, thou schalt opyne myn lippis. And my mouth schal schewe thi prisynof. God, take heede to myn help Lord, 'hije thee to helpe me. Glorie be to the fadir and to tne sone and to the holy goost : Prayer Book and the Clergy shew that this was rarely, if ever, the practice until the last Revision, when the two Services were made alike in this respect, THE LORD'S PRAYER. Tlie above is a version of the Lord's Prayer as it was used by tlie people in their daily services, when the prayers of the Church were still said in Latin, about the end of the fourteenth century. Some earlier versions are here given, whicli may be taken as representatives of those tran-shations into tlie vuh'ar tongue which were so frequently directed in jiroviuci.il .-uid diocesan constitutions. There cannot be a donlit th.at the Lord's Prayer was as familiar to the people of England in ancient days as it is at [jresent. The first among the following ancient forms of it is taken from a gloss on tlie Evangelists, written by Eadfrid, Bishop of Lindisfarne, about A d, 700. [Cotton MS, Nero D, iv.] Fader us:er tliu arth in Heofn.as sie gehalgad noma thin to cymeth ric tliin, sie willo thin sua; is in Heofne and in Eortho. Hlaf userne oferwistlic sel us to da>g, and forgef us scyltha usra su.Ti use forgefon scylgum usum. And ne iulead usith in costnunge. Ah gefrig usicli from yfle. The ne.xt is from Saxon homilies of about the same date :— Fader ure thu the in heofnum earth, beo gehalgud tliin noma. Cume to thin rice, weorthe thin willa swa°swa on Heofune swile on eorthe, Hlaf userne dceghwamlican sel ua to daeg, and forlete us ure scylde, swa swa we ac foHeten thaem the scyldigat with us, ne geleade in costnunge. Ah gelefe us of yfle. .^ The next is from a MS. in the Library of Caius College, Cambridge, belonging to the thirteenth century, and printed by Mr. iLiskell in the Appendix to hia fourteenth-century Prymer, ilonumenta Jiitualia, iii. 248 : — Fader oure that art in heve, i-halgeed bee thi nome, i-cunie tlii kiuereiche, y-worthe thi wylle also is in hevene so be on crthe, oure iche-dayes bred jif us to day, and iornl us oure gultes, also we forpfet oure gultare, aud ne led ows nowth into foudingge, auth ales ows of harine. So be it. The next is from a MS., No. 142, ia St. John's College Library, Cambridge, of the fourteenth century, and ia also from Mr. Ma.skell's 3foniimenla BitKalia, iii, 249 : Fader oure that art in heuene, halwed be thi name : come thi kyngdom : fullild be thi wil in heuene as in erthe : oure ech day bred ?ef vs to day, and forieue vs oure dettes as w^e for!eueth to oure detoures : and ne led vs nouj in temptacion, bote deliuere vs of euel. So be it. _This is from a MS. in the Bodleian Library [Donee, 246, f. 15] of the fifteenth century. It also is reprinted from ilonumetita Ritualia, iii, 249 : — Pater ?ios'mers, Alleluia, b Afterwards fol- lowed, in 1549 only, Attii ffofri faster to Trinity Sun- day, Hallelujah. As be/ore is af- feinted at Matins. As it was in the bygynnyng and now and euer and in to the worldis of worldis. So be it. " God make us saaf . thy name : thy kyngedom come to thee : thy wille be do in erthe as in heuen : onre eche dayes brede jeue us to daye : and forjeue us cure dettes as we forjeue to oure dettoures : and lede us nojte into temptacion : bot delyver us from yvel. Amen. The last is from the Prymer of 1538. Momimenta Ritualia, iii. 249 :— Our father whiohe art in lieuen, halowed be thy name. Let thy kyngdome cum vnto vs. Thy wyll be fulfylled as well in erthe, as it is in heuen. Gyue vs this daye our daylye breade. And forgyue vs our trespasses, as we forgyue them that tres- paa agaynst vs. And lede vs nat in to temptacyon. But delyuer vs from euyll. So be it. Many more such ancient English versions are extant, and the above are only given as specimens which shew distinct transitions of language from one age to another. [For others, see Rdiqu'm Antupuc, vol. i. ; Lisgard's Amjlo-Saxon Church, vol. ii.; Maskell's il/onwrafjito Ritualia, vol. iii.; Chamber- LAYJfE's Oratio Dominica.] § Exposition of the Lord's Prayer bi/ St. Cyril of Jerusalem, A.D. 347. [It may give an additional interest to this to mention the historical fact, that it was part of a lecture delivered in the Church which had been recently erected over the Holy Sepulchre ; and to remind the reader that the interval of time between the original delivery of the Divine Prayer to the Apostles and this exposition of it by a Bishop of the Holy City was less than that which has elapsed since the first publication of the Prayer Book in 1549.] Then, after these things, we say that Prayer which the Saviour delivered to His own disciples, with a pure conscience styling God our Father, and saying. Our Father, Which art in heaven. O most surpassing loving-kindness of God ! On them who revolted from Him and were in the very extreme of misery, has He bestowed such complete forgiveness of tlieir evil deeds, and so great participation of grace, as that they should even call Him Father. Our Father, Which art In heaven ; they also are a heaven who bear the image of the heavenly, in whom God is, dwell- ing and walking in them. Hallowed be Thy Name. The Name of God is in its own nature holy, whether we say so or not ; but since it is some- times profaned among sinners, according to the words, Througli yo'u My Name is continually blasphemed among the Gentiles, we pray that in us God's Name may be hallowed ; not that it becomes holy from not being holy, but because it becomes holy in us, when we become holy, and do things M'orthy of holiness. Thy kingdom come. The clean soul can say with boldness, Thy kingdom come ; for he who has heard Paul saying, Let not sin reign in your mortal body, but has cleansed himself in deed, thought, and word, will say to God, Thy kingdom fiome. Thy will be done as In heaven, bo In earth. The Divine and blessed Angels do the will of (Jod, as David in a Pa.ilm has said. Bless the Lord, ye His Angels, that excel in strengtli, that do Hia Comm.andmcntH. So, then, thou meanest by thy prayer, " As Thy will is done by the Angels, so be it done on eartli also by me, Lord." Give UB thla day our super-BUbstantial bread. This common bread is not sujier-subatantial bread, but this Holy ISread is super-substantial, that is, appointed for the substance of the soul. For this Bread gocth nut into the belly and is cast out into the dr.atight, but is diffused through all thou art, for tlie benefit of body and soul. But by thia d.ay He means "eacli d.T.y," as also Paul has said, \Vhile it is called to-day. And forgive ua our debts as we forgive our debtors. For we have many sins. For we offend both in word and in thought, and very many things do we worthy of condemna- tion ; and if we say that we have no sin, we lie, as John says. And we enter into a covenant with God, entreating Him to pardon our sins, as we also forgive our neighbours their debts. Considering then what we receive, and for what, let us not jiut off, nor delay to forgive one another. The offences com- mitted against us are slight and trivial, and easily settled ; but those which we have committed against God are great, and call for mercy such as His only is. Take heed, therefore, lest for these small and inconsiderable sins against tliyself, thou bar against thyself forgiveness from God for thy most grievous sins. And lead us not into temptation, Lord. Does, then, the Lortl teach to pray thus, viz. that we may not be tempted at all? And how is it said elsewhere, "The man who is not tempted is unproved;" and again, My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations ; or rather, does not the entering into temptation mean the being whelmed under the temptation ? For the temptation is like a winter-torrent, difficult to cross. Some, then, being most skilful swimmers, pass over, not being whelmed beneatTi temptations, nor swept down by them at all ; wliile others who are not such, enter- ing into them sink in them. As, for example, Judas entering into the temptation of covetousness, swam not through it, but sinking beneath it, was choked both in body and spirit. Peter entered into the temptation of the denial ; but having entered it, he was not overwhelmed by it, but manfully swimming through it, he was delivered from the temptation. Listen again in another place, to the company of unscathed saints, giving thanks for deliverance from temptation. For Thou, O God, hast proved us ; Thou hast tried us like as silver is tried. Thou hroughtest ns into the net ; Thou laidest affliction upon our loins. Thou hast caused men to ride over our heads ; we went through fire and water ; but Thou broughtest us out into a wealthy ])lace ; now their coming into a wealthy place is their being delivered from temptation. But deliver us from the evil. If Lead us not into tempta- tion had implied the not being tempted at all. He would not have said. But deliver us from the evil. Now the evil is the Wicked Spirit who is our adversary, from whom iie pray to be delivered. Then after completing the prayer, Thou sayest. Amen; by this Amen, which means, "So be it," setting thy seal to the petitions of this divinely-taught prayer. [St. Cvkil's Catech. Led. xxiii. 11-18.] § Paraphrase of the Lord's Prayer, hi the. Author of " The Christian Year." [The following paraphrase is reprinted ' to illustrate the devotional use of the Lord's Prayer in private, on Liturgical principles. The "special intention" here shewn is also one which bears closely upon two objects of this work, that of promoting the present unity of the Church of Christ, and that of shewing the unity of the Church of England with the Catholic Church of old.] Our Father, Which art in heaven: One (Joil, the Father Almighty, One Lord Jtsus Clirist, One Holy (Jhost, pro- ceeding "from tlie Father and tlie Son ; have mercy upon us, Thy cliildrcn, and make us all One in Thee. Hallowed be Thy Name: Tliou Wlio art One Lord, and Thy Name One ; have mercy upon us all, who arc called by Thy Name, and make us more and more One in I'liee. Thy kingdom come : King of llighteousncss and Peace, g.ither us more and more into Thy kingdom, and make ns botli visiltly and invisilily One in Thee. Thy will be done in earth, as it Is In heaven : Thou, Who hast 1 From the Prpfnce to .Scntioii.i, AcaiUmical and Occasional, by the Rev. Jolin Keblt^, MA., 1848. OEtJening jprapcr. 209 IT Then sliall be said or sung tlie Psalms in order as they be appointed. Tlicn a Lesson of tliu Ohl Testament as is appointed. And after that, Mmj- nifical (or the Song of the blessed Virgin Mary) in EngUsli, as foUoweth. ~\ yr Y soul dotli magnify tlie Lord : the Idwlines.s of His Magnificat. s. Lukei. _LV_L and my .spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. For He hath regarded handmaiden. For behold, from henceforth : all generation.^ shall call me blessed. For Ho that is mighty hath magnified me : and holy is His Name. And His mercy is on them that fear Him : throughout all generations. He hath shewed strength with His arm : He hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He hath put down the mighty from their seat : and hath exalted the humble and meek. He hath filled the hungry with good things : and the rich He hath sent empty away. He remembering His mercy hath holpen His servant Israel : as He promised to our forefathers, Abraham and his seed, for ever. Psalmus. Lucie i. "~]y /TAONIFICAT : anima mea Dominum. -LVJL Et exultavit .spiritus mens : in Deo sal- utari meo Quia respexit humilitatem ancillce Sua3 : ecce enim ex hoc beatam me dicent omnes genera- tiones. Quia fecit mihi magna Qui potens est : et sanctum Nomen Eju.s. Et misericordia Ejus a progenie in progenies : timentibus Eum. Fecit poteutiam in brachio Suo ; di.sper.sit su- perbos mente cordis sui. Deposuit potentes de sede ; et exaltavit humiles Esurientes iraplevit bonis : et divites dimisit inanes. Suscepit Israi^l puerum Suum : recordatus misericordia Suas ; Sicut locutus est ad patres nostros ; Abraham, et seniini ejus in sKcula. declared unto us the mystery of Thy will,, to " gather together in One all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth ; " conform us, Lord, to that holy will of Thine, and make us all One in Thee. Give us this day our dally bread : Thou in Whom we being many are One Bread and One Body ; grant that we, being all partakers of that One Bread, may day by day be more and more One in Thee. And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive them that tres- pass against us : Thou, Who didst say, Fatlnr, fon/ire them, for those who were rending Thy blessed Body, for- give us the many things we have done to mar the unity of Thy mystical Body, and make us, forgiving and loving one another, to be more and more One in Thee. And lead us not into temptation : As Tliou didst enable Thine Apostles to continue with Thee in Thy temptations ; so enable us, by Thy grace, to abide with Thee in Thy true Church, luider all trials, visible and invisible, nor ever to cease from being One in Tliee. But deliver us from evil : from the enemy and false accuser ; from envy and grudging ; from an unquiet and discon- tented spirit ; from heresy and schism ; from strife and debate ; from a scornful temper, and reliance on our own understanding ; from ofTence given or taken ; and from whatever might disturb Thy Church, and cause it to be less One in Thee. CoOD LORn, DELIVER AND PRESERVE ThY SERV.VNTS FOR EVER. THE MAGNIFICAT. The Hymn of the Blessed Virgin Mary can be traced in use in the Daily Serrice of the Cliurch as far back as the begin- ning of the sixth century. At that time [a.d. 507] it appears iu the rule of St. C'aesarius of Aries, in tlie early morning Oiiice of Lauds. In the Eastern Church it is also a Lauds (Janticle. But Amalarius [a.d. 820] speaks of its use in his time as a Canticle at Vespers ; and in the Armeni.au Church it is used at Compline as well as at Lauds. Tlie English Church has used it at Vespers for at least eight hiuidred years : and its present position is analogous to that which it occupied in the ancient Service. There are English versions of it from as early a date as the fourteenth century. [Maskell's Momimenta Rititalia, iii. 245, 246. Mirror of our Ladtj, xliii, Blunt's ed. ] Several attempts were made by the Puritans to banish it from the Prayer Book, but hajipily with- out success. On the other hand, especial reverence was shewn towards this Canticle and the Benedictus in the ceremonial of the ancient Church of England, by the use of incense while they were being sung. [See the ceremony in full in Traiisl. of Urn: rmlt. p. 327.] Of all hymns known to the Church this is the most closely connected with our Blessed Lord, having been spoken by His Virgin Mother, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, at the very season when the Divine overshadowing had brought about the Incarnation of the Word. She began to be, in tliat season, the "tabernacle for the Sun" of Righteousness, "Which Cometh forth as a Bridegroom out of His chamber, and rejoiceth as a giant to run His course. " The appearance and ■i\ord3 of tlie Archangel had revealed to her the exalted office to which God had chosen her, and she knew that from that hour .she would carry iu her bosom for nine months the Saviour of the world. But though so "higlily favoured," and "full of grace," and conscious of being, as .Jeremy Taylor says, " superexalted by .an honour greater than the world ever saw," all her words are uttered in a spirit of pro- found humility as regards herself, even when she declares that "all generations shall call me Blessed," and of the most heavenly adoration as regards Him Who had magnified her. The Mother of our Lord, and the Church, "which is the Mother of us .all, " have alwa3's been closely linked together in the mind of Christianity. The "Elect Lady," and the Woman " clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars," who, "being with child, cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered," and who "brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron : and her child was caught up unto God, and to His throne," have seemed, from the different points of view taken by different .ages, to represent now one and then the other, the Mother of our Lord, and the Mother of us all. This community of characteristics is in accordance with the general teaching of the New Testament respecting the mystery of the communion between our Lord Himself and those who are made members of His Body by new birth. And for tliis reason, " The Song of the Blessed Virgin Mary " has a peculiar fitness as the daily song of the Church of Christ, since God has honoured it with so great honour, in having made it the means by wliich the work of the Incarnation is made effectual to the salvation of souls. The Blessed Virgin Mother offered up her thanksgiving to God because He had remembered His mercy .and His ancient covenant, by making His Son incarnate through her ; and the Church offers up her thauksgiving to Him, because, through her, the mystical Body of Christ is being continually brought forth to His greater glory. It is also to be observed of this, as of the other Canticles, that it is sung to the pr.aise of the Personal AVord, as revealed in the Written Word ; to the praise of God in Christ, re- vealed in the Old Testament Scrijjtures as well as in the New. 2IO OBticning Ipraper. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son : and to the Holy CtHOST ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. Or else tliis " Psalm ; except it be on the Nineteentli Day of the Month, wlien it is read in the ordinary course of the Psalms. Cantate Domino, Ps. xcviii. o SING unto the Lord a new song : for He hath done mar- vellous things. With His own right hand, and with Hi.-j holy arm : hath He gotten Himself the victory. The Lord declared His salvation : His righteous- ness hath He openly shewed in the sight of the heathen. He hath remembered His mercy and truth to- ward the house of Israel ; and all the ends of the world have seen the salvation of our God. Shew yourselves joyful unto the Lord, all ye lands : sing, rejoice, and give thanks. Praise the Lord upon the harp : sing to the harp with a psalm of thanksgiving. With trumpets also and shawms : O .shew your- selves joyful before the Lord the King. Let the sea make a noise, and all that therein is : the round world, and they that dwell therein. Let the floods clap their hands, and let the hills be joyful together before the Lord : for He Cometh to judge the earth. With righteousness shall He judge the world : and the people with equity. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son : and to the Holy Ghost ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. T Then a Lesson of the New Testament, as it is appointed. And after that, Nunc dimittis (or the Song of Simeon) in English, as followeth. Nunc dimittis. TORD, now lettest Thou Thy ser- s. Luke ii. 29. _Li vaut depart in peace : accord- ing to Thy word. (I This Canticle w3s introduced in 1552. « Sar f Sar. Gloria Patri, et Filio : et Spiritpi Sancto. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in saecula sreculorum. Amen. Psalmus xcvii. */^ANTATE Domino canticum novum : quia ^—^ mirabilia fecit. Salvavit Sibi dextera Ejus : et brachium sanctum Ejus. Notum fecit Dominus salutare Suum : in con- .spectu gentium revelavit justitiam Suam. Kecordatus est misericordias Su;k : et veritatis Sure Domui Israel. Viderunt omnes termini terrse salutare Dei nostri : jubilate Deo omnis terra : cantate et exultate et psallite. Psallite Domino in cithara, in cithara et voce psalmi : in tubis ductilibus, et voce tubse cornese. Jubilate in conspectu Piegis Domini : move- atur mare et plenitudo ejus : orbis terrarum et c[ui habitant in eo. Flumina plaudent manu, simul montes exulta- bunt a conspectu Domini : quoniam venit judi- care terram. Judicabit orbem terrarum in justitia : et populos in sequitate. 'N Canticum Simeonis. Luca; ii. LTNC dimittis servum Tuum, Domine : secundum verbum Tuum in pace. CANTATE DOMINO. Tliis Psalm was not used in any otlier waj' than in its place in the Psalter (Mattins, on Saturdays) until 1552, when it was inserted here as an alternative responsory to the first Lesson, probably for the purpose of meeting the objections to the Magnificat which had lieeu raised by the Puritans. It bears some resemblance, in its latter verses, to the Benedicite Omnia Opera, tlie works of God by land and sea being called upim to join in His praise. It lias also been suggested that there are parallel expres- sions in the Cantate and tlie Magnificat, which seem to indi- cate tliat the latter is in some degree founded on the former. These are the following : — Marjnifieat. C'anlate Domino. Hethat is mighty hatli mag- He hath done marvellous nified me [or "done to me great things, things "]. He liath shewed strength With His own riglit liand with His arm : He hath scat- and Mith His lioly arm : hath tered the proud . . . He hath He gotten Himself the victory, put down the miglity. His mercy is on tliem that The Lord declared His sal- fear Him throughout all gene- vation : His righteousness rations. liath He openly shewed in the sight of the heathen. He remembering His mercy He hatli remembered His hath holpeu His servant Israel, mercy and truth toward the house of Israel. Whether this parallel is accidental or nut, it may serve to shew the Evangelical character of the I'sahn which is per- mitted to be used as a substitute for the Song of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Yet it does not seem as if tliere was ever any necessity for superseding the latter ; and, where choice is given, the Magnificat may well be preferred as being offered up daily to Cod's praise by the wliole Catholic Ciiurch. When Evensong is repeated, it may bo considered advisable to use the alternative Canticle at one of the Services ; but, in that case, the Magnificat sliould always be said at the later Evensong. NUNC DIMITTIS. The "Song of Simeon " is another Canticle in praise of the manifestation of the Incarnate AVord. It has been used at Compline or at Vespers throughout the Church from very early times, being mentioned in the Apostolical I'onstitutions (written at the end of the third century, at tlie latest) as an Evening Canticle. There are English versions of it as early as the fourteenth century. The Nunc Dimittis is singularly fitted for Evensong. Like the words of D.avid, "I will lay nie down in peace and take my rest, for it is Thou, Lord, only that makest me to dwell (ZBticning Iprai'er. 2 I I For mine eyes have seen : Thy salvation, Which Thou hast prepared : before the face of all people ; To be a light to lighten the Gentiles : and to be the glory of Thy people Israel. Glory be to the Fathee, and to the Son : and to the Holy Ghost ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. IT Or else this " Psalm ; except it be on the Twelfth Day of the Month. Deus miserea- (^ OD be merciful unto us, and tur, Ps. ixvii. VX biesg „s . and shew us the light of His countenance, and be merciful unto us : That Thy way may be known upon earth : Thy saving health among all nations. Let the people praise Thee, O God : yea, let all the people praise Thee. O let the nations rejoice and be glad : for Thou shalt judge the folk righteously, and govern the nations upon earth. Let the people praise Thee, God : yea, let all the people praise Thee. Then shall the earth bring forth her increase : and God, even our own God, shall give us His blessing. God shall bless us : and all the ends of the world shall fear Him. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son : and to the Holy Ghost ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. H Then shall be said or sung the Apostles' Creed by the Minister and the people standing. T BELIEVE in God the Father Almighty, -J- Maker of heaven and earth : And in Jesus Christ His only Sox our Lord, Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, Born of IT This Canticle w.is introduced in 1552. c Prymer Version of fourteenth century. IM. K. iii. iSs.J Quia viderunt oculi mei : salutare Tuum. Quod parasti : ante faciem omnium jjopulorum ; Lumen ad revelationem gentium : et gloriam plebis Tua; Israel. Gloria Patri, et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto. Sicut erat in principin, et nunc, et semper, et in ssecula soeculorum. Amen. Psalmus Ixvi. *T~^EUS misereatur nostri, et benedicat nobis: -L^ illuminet vultum Suum super nos, et misereatur nostri. Ut cognoscamus in terra viam Tuam ; in omnibus gentibus salutare Tuum. Confiteantur Tibi populi Decs : confiteantur Tibi populi omnes. La;tentur et exultent gentes, c|uoniam judicas populos in requitate, et gentes in terra dirigis. Confiteantur Tibi populi Deus, confiteantur Tibi populi omnes, terra dedit fructum suum. Benedicat nos Deus, Deus noster ; benedicat nos Deus : et metuant Eum omnes fines terroe. Gloria Patri, et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in soecula SKculorum. Amen. [Credo in. '~r BILEUE in god, fadir almyjti, makere of -L heuene and of erthe : and in iesu crist the sone of him, oure lord, oon aloone : which is con- ceyued of the hooli gost : born of marie maiden : in safety," it is the aspiration of that faith which can behold Christ lightening the darkness of all night, and fulfilling the words of the prophet, "It shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light." As the Gospels of the Moi'ning Les- sons reveal to us the " Day-spring " from on high "visiting us," so tlie Epistles of the Evening Lessons reveal the Light of Christ's glory enlightening tlie Gentile as well as the Jewish world. In the old Evening Services of the Church of England there were touching references to death, and the rest of the departed ; and immediately after Nunc Dimittis, in Passion and Holy Week, was sung the glorious anthem "Media vita in morte sumus," which is now used only in the Burial Service. This close connection between the Song of Simeon and the iilea of our Blessed Lord's Passion arises out of the occasion on which it was first uttered, tlie Presentation, which was in effect a Sacrifice ; and of the words of Simeon which imme- diately followed, "Behold, this Child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel ; and for a sign whicli shall be spoken against ; yea, a sword shall pierce through thine own soul also, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. " [Luke ii. 34, 35.] And such a connection of ideas cannot fail to remind us also of our Lord's own departing words, "Father, into Thy hands I commend Jly Spirit," when "He saw of the ti-avail of His soul," as the eyes of Simeon saw the salvation of the Lord, "and was satisfied," This calm repose of faith on God, — looking for a present rest on the bosom of Jesus, and a future rest in His Paradisal Presence, — has always been the tone of Evensong in the Church ; and is one that will always be in harmony with the feelings of those whose day has been a day of work : who look solemnly, yet not gloomily, tow-ards that coming night when no man can ■vvork ; and whose eyes are fixed with hope on that "rest which remaineth for the people of God," through tlie salvation which Christ has prepared. Early English versions of the Nunc Dimittis may be found in Maskell's Monnmcnia Ritiialia, iii. 246, and ilirror of our Lady, xliii, Blunt's ed. DEUS MISEREATUR. This Psalm was inserted, like the Cantate Domino, in 1552, but was familiar in the older services, being the fourth fixed Psalm at Lauds on Sundays and other Festivals. It was also part of the Office of Bidding Prayers which was used every Sunday. A fourteenth-century version of it is printed in Maskell's Monumenta Rilualia, iii. 20. Although of a more jubilant character than the Nunc Dimittis, it has several features in common with it, besides this connection with an Office in which the departed were commemorated. Like that, it praises God tor the extension of the Gospel : and as Simeon offers thanksgiving that his eyes have seen the salvation of God, so David in this Psalm prays that the Light of His countenance may be shewn to us, and His saving health known among all nations. Occasions may arise when this Canticle is peculiarly appro- priate : but for ordinary Evensong (and especially fc.r the later of two services) it is better always to keep to the ancient spirit and practice of the Church and use the Nunc Dimittis. THE APOSTLES' CREED. A large number of earlv English versions of the Creed are 212 OEocnms Prajjcc. the Virgin Mary, Suffered under Pontius Pilate, Was crucified, dead, and buried, He descended into liell ; Tlie third day He rose again from the dead, He ascended into heaven, And sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty; From thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost ; The holy Catho- lick Church ; The Communion of Saints ; The Forgiveness of sins ; The Resurrection of tlie body, And the Life everlasting. Amen. IT And after that, the.'se Prayers following, all devoutly kneeling ; the ilinister first pronouncing with a loud voice, The Lord be with you. Answer. And with tliy spirit. Minister. IT Let us pray. Lord, have mercy upon us. Christ, have mercy upon iia. Lord, have mercy upon us. *I Then the ilinister. Clerks, and people, shall say the Lord's Prayer with a loud voice. OUR F.\THER, Which art in heaven. Hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth. As it is in heavea Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses. As we forgive them that trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation ; But deliver us from evil. Amen. IT Then tlie Priest standing up, ''shall say, O Lord, shew Thy mercy upon us. a Prymer Version of fourteenth century. [^f. R. ill. 122. etc.] c Orieiually the MS. read, and so con- tinuing lo the end of tlie Ser-L'tce, but tliese words were erased. \See note at p. 200.] rf Prymer Version of fourteenth century, [vl/. R. iii. no.) suffride passioun undir pounce pilat : crucified, deed, and biried : he wente doun to hellis : the thridde day he roos a3en fro deede : he .steij to heuenes : he sittith on the rijt syde of god the fadir almyjti : thenus he is to come for to deme the quyke and deede. I beleue in the hooli goost : feith of hooli chirche : comunynge of seyntis : forjyuenesse of synnes : ajenrisyng of fleish, and euerlastynge lyf. So be it.] Preie we. Lord, haue merci on us. Crist, haue merci on us. Lord, haue merci on us.] piIATEP qiiQiv 6 €V Toii oi'pavoli, ayiacrOyTii} to ovo/JLci crov eXderiD ij /iacriAcia (tov yevrjdrjTia to 6eXrj/j.d crov, ws tv ovpavM, Kal lirl ttJ? y'j'i. Tuv aprov i)ixh>v tov iTTiovcriov SiSov rip.lv to kolO' ■i^fxepav Kal oi^es ^jp-tv Tas apapTiai ypwv, Kal yap avTol dcjiUpiv TvavTi d^ct'Aoi'Tt ijpiv Kal pi] ficrevtyKyi »}yMas €19 Treipaapiiv, iWXa pva-ai ijpa'i OTTO TOV TTOVI^pOr.^ ''Lord, shewe us thi merci : extant. The one in the right-hand column above is taken from the ancient Prymer contained in M.\skell's Monnmenta Ritualia, some others being printed in the Appendix to the volume. The otliers which follow this note are copied from Heurtlet's Harmonia Stjmbolka, where several others, of various dates, from the ninth to the sixteenth century, are to be found.' Ninth Century. From MS. 427 in the Lambeth Library. Ic gelyfe on God Fieder oelmihtigne, Scyppend heofonan and eorthan ; And on Hielend Crist, Sunu his anlican, Drihten urne ; Se the wa^ geacnod of tham Halgan Gaste, Acaenned of Marian tham msdene ; Gethrowad under tham Pontiacan Pilate, Gerod f;estnad. Dead and bebyrged ; He nither astah to hel wanim ; Tham thriddan drege he aras fram deadum ; He astah to heofonum ; He sit to swythran hand God Faeder wiea a;lmihtigan ; Thonan toweard dcni.an tha cucan and tha deadan. Ic gelyfe Tha halgan gelathiinge riht gelyfdan ; Halgana gema>nysse ; And forgyfnysse synna ; Fl.'Bsces »riste ; And tha,'t ece lif. Si hit swa. [Tlie next is of great interest from the illu.stration it affords of the necessity thrust on the Church of England during a part of the middle ages, of teaching her people in three dif- ferent languages. It also represents the three principal ele- ments of modern English.] tJirca A.D. 1125. From MS. R. 17 i« the Library of Trinity Colletje, Cambridge. Ic gelefe on Code Fa;dera felwealdend, Jco crci en Deu 1e Perre tut pu.ant, Credo in Deiim Patrcm omnipotentem, ' The student sliouM compare Profi nsor Ilcui tley'n hool< with WAi.rnin9' KhUolhtca .SymioHca for the earliest fonna of the Crcetl. Sceppend heofones and eorthan ; Le criatur de ciel e de terre ; Creatorem cceli et terrae ; And on Helende Crist, Suna his aniicli, E en Jesu Crist, sun Fil uniel, Et in Jesum Christum Filium ejus unicum. Drihten ure ; Nostre Seinur ; Dominum nostrum ; Syo the akynned is of tham Halig Gaste, Ki concevz est del Seint Esprit, Qui conceptus est de Spiritu Sancto, Boran of M[.arian tham maxlen :] Ncz de Marie la Natus ex Maria Virgine : [Gethrowode under tham Pontiscam] Pilate, and on rode ahangen, ,.,.». „jig„ pjj^tg crucifiez, Passus sub Poutio Pilato, crucifixus. Dead and beberiged ; Morz, e seveliz ; Mortuus, et eepultua ; Ho adun ast;ih to hellre Descedied as enfcrs ; Descendit ad inferna : OEticning pragcr. 21 Answer. Aud grant us Thy salvation. Priest. O Lord, save the Queen. Answer. And mercifully hear us when we call upun Thee. Priest. Endue Thy Ministers with righteousness. Answer. And make Thy chosen people joyful. Priest. O Lord, save Thy people. Answer. And Viless Thine inheritance. Priest. Give peace in our time, Loud. Answer. Because there is none other that tighteth for us, but only Thou, O God. Priest. O God, make clean our hearts within us. Answer. And take not Thy Holy Spieit from us. a Pryiiier Version of foiiTteentli century. [.)/. R.A\. 38. ) And 3yue to us thi saluacioun. Lord, make saaf the King ; And ful out heerc thou us in tlie dai that we shulen inclepe thee. Thi prostis be clotliid rijtwisnesse : And thine halewis ful out glade thei. Lord, make saaf thi peple : And blesse to thin eritase. ["Lord, 3yue pees in oure dales, for ther is noon othir that shal fy3te for us, but thou lord oure god.] Thriddau degge he aras fram deatha ; Et tierz jurn relevad de morz ; Tertia die reaurrexit a mortuis ; He astah to heofone ; Muntad as ciels ; Ascendit ad celos ; Sit on switi-an healfe Godes Faederes eahnihtig ; Siet a la destre de Deu Perre tres tut puant ; Sedet ad dexteram Dei Patria omnipotentis ; Thanen he is to cumene, aud to denienua quiche aud deade. Dihic est avenir jugier lea via e lea morz. lude venturus judicare vivos et mortuos. Ic gelefe on Halig Gast ; Jeo crei el Seint Espirit ; Credo in Spiritum Sanctum ; And on halig gesomnunge fulfremede ; Seinte Eglise Catholica ; Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam : Halegan hiniennesse ; La communiun dea aeintes choses ; Sanctorum communionem ; Forgyfenysse synna ; Remissium des pecchiez ; Remissionem peccatorum ; Flesces up arisnesse ; Resurrectiun de charn ; Carnis resurrectiouem ; Lif echo Vie pardurable Vitam ffiternam Beo hit swa. Seit feit. Amen. Thirleentli Centunj. From a MS. in the British Museum, Cleopatra, B. vi. fol. 201. Hi true in God, Fader Hal-michttende, Tha makede heven and herdeth ; And in Jhesu Krist, is ane lepi Sone, Hure Laverd ; That was bigotin of the Hali Gast, Aud boru of the maiden Marie ; Pinid under Punce Pilate, festened to the rode, Ded, and dulvun ; Licht in til helle ; The thride dai up ras fra dede to live ; Steg intil hevenne ; Sitis on his Fadir richt hand, Fadir alwaldand ; He then sal curae to deme the quike an the dede. Hy troue hy theli Gast ; And hely * * kirke ; The samninge of halgea ; Forgifnes of sinnes ; Uprisigen of fleyes ; And life withuten ende. Amen. From the Prymer of 1538. Maskell's Monumenla Eilitalia, iii. 251. I beleue in god the father almyghty, maker of heuen and earthe ; And in Jesu Chryst hys onely sonne, our Lorde ; whiche was conceyued by the holy ghoste, And borne of the virgyn Mary ; which suffred deathe under Pons Pylate, and was crucifyed, deade, and buryed ; which de.scendyd to hell ; The thyrde day rose from de.ath to lyfe ; whiche ascendyd into heuen; and syttheth at the ry?t hande of God the Father almyghtye ; And from thens shall come for to judge both the quycke and the deade. I beleue in the holy Ghoste ; The holy churche catholike ; The communyon of sayntes ; The reniyssyon of synnes ; The resuiTectyon of the flesshe ; And the lyfe euerlastynge. So be it. 214 OEDcnmB ipiaycr. •^ Then shall follow three Collects : The first of The Day ; The second for Peace ; The third for Aid against all Perils, as hereafter followeth ; which two last Collects shall be daily said at "Evening Prayer without alteration. 1i The Second Collect at "Evening Prayer. OGOD, from "Whom all lioly desires, all good *^5;ir. counsels, and all just works do proceed ; Give unto Thy servants that peace which the world cannot give ; that both our hearts may be set to obey Thy commandments, and also that by Thee we being defended from the fear of our enemies may pass our time in rest and quietness; through the merits of Jesus Christ our Saviour. Allien. only]. GcUs. pace. \ The Third Collect, for Aid against all Perils. IIGHTEX our darkness, we beseech Thee, O ■^ LoED ; and by Thy great mercy defend us from all perils and dangers of this night ; for the love of Thy only Son, our Saviour, Jesus Christ. A vim. '' ^ In Quires and places where they sing, here followeth the Anthem. II A Prayer for the Queen's JIajesty. OLOPiD our heavenly Fathee, high and mighty. King of kings, Lord of lords, the only Euler of princes. Who dost irom Thy throne behold all the dwellers upon earth ; Most heartily we beseech Thee with Thy favour to behold our most gracious Sovereign Lady, Queen VIC- TORIA ; and so replenish her with the grace of Thy Holy Spirit, that she may alway incline to Thy will, and walk in Thy way : Endue her plenteously with heavenly gifts ; grant her in health and wealth long to live ; strengthen her that she may vanquish and overcome all her enemies ; and finally, after this life, she may \ sotts '349 Grcij. mid Missa pro Mur. i 1-1- f 5av. Greg, aiul Gelas. Oral, atl Completorium. Mur. i. 745- rfFroni tliis Rubric to the end of the Service was all in. troduced in 166:;. e Pryraer of 1553. *~r\EUS, a Quo sancta desideria, recta consilia, -L^ et justa sunt opera : da servis Tuis iUam quam mundus dare non potest pacem : ut et corda nostra mandatis Tuis dedita, et, hostium sublata forniidiue, tempora sint Tua protectione tranquilla. 'TLLUMINA, qu;t.-3umus, Dojiine Deus, tene- J- bras nostras : et totius hujus noctis insidias Tu a nobis repelle propitius. Per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum Filium Tuum, Qui Tecum vivit et regnat in unitate Spieitus Sancti Deus, per omnia sascula saeculorum. Amen. ' r A Prayer for the Kynge. MOST merciful father, at we thy seruauutes by dutie, and children by grace, do beseche thee mooste humbly, to preserue Edwarde the Syst thy sonne and seruaunte, and cure Kynge and gouernour: Sowe in hym good Lorde suche seede of vertue now in hys yonge age, that many yeares this Eealme maye enioye much fruite of this thy blessynge in hym, throughe Jesus Christe our Lorde. Amen. THE SECOND COLLECT. [Prymer Version of Fourteenth Centurtj. .1/. i?. iii. 38; comp. 112. Preie we. For the pees. Deus a quo. God, of whom ben hooli desiris, rijt councels and iust werkis : jyue to tlii seruantis pees that the world may not leue, that in our hertis jouun to thi ciimmaudemeutis, and the drede of enemyes putt awei, owre tyines be pesible thur? thi defendyng. Bi oure lnrd iesii crist, tlii sone, that with thee lyueth and regiieth in the unitie of the hooli goost god, bi all worldis of worldis. So be it.] This prayer is tlie Collect of the same ^[i.ssa pro pace, of which the Morning Collect for Peace is the "Post-Communion. " It also was used at Lauds, at Vespers, and in the Litany, in the ancient Services : and dates from the Sacrameutary of Gelasius, a.d. 494. Coming as it originally did at the close of Evensong, it formed a sweet cadence of prayer, fitly concluding with tlie following short but toucliing Collect. It follows up very exactly the tone of tlie Nunc Diinittis, and rings with a gentle echo of the peace tliat lies beyond this world, as well as of the peace which the world cannot give, nor the soul entirely receive wliile it is in the world. In the Morning Collect the tone of the prayer w'as that i.f one who asks Ciod of His mercy to bless and co-operate witli flis own in their strife against spiritual foes : but in tlio Evening the words are more those of one who is no longer .able to strive against his enemies, but looks to his Lord God alone to be his defence and his shield. [Between the sccoml and third Collect at Evening Prayer Bishop Cosin wished to insert the second of the Collects appended to the Communion Service, "0 Almighty Lord, and everlasting C4od," under the title of "The Collect for grace and protection," but the alteration was rejected. The idea teems to have been taken from the York Litany.] THE THIRD COLLECT. This prayer is of equal antiquity with tlie preceding : and is e-xpressly appointed to be used at Evening Prayer in the Sacramentary of Cielasius. It :\as taken into our Evensong from the Compline of tlie Salisbury Use. Here again the Nunc Dimittis is followed up in its tone : but the words are taken almost literally from the Psalms, wliich liave been the great storehouse of Praj'cr as well as Praise to the Church of all ages. "Consider and hear mc, Lord my God : lighten mine eyes that I sleep not in ileatli. 'I'liou .also shalt light my candle : the Lord my Ciod shall make my darkness to be light. Yea, tlie darkness is no darkness with Thee, but the night is as clear as the day : tlie darkness and light to Thee are both .alike. He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: and He that keepeth thee will not sleep. Behold, He that keepeth Isnael : shall neither slumber nor sleep. The Lord Himself is thy keeper : the Lord is thy defence upon thy right hand. So that the sun shall not burn thee by day : neither the moon by night. He shall deliver thee from the snare of tlic hunter : and from the noisome pestilence. He shall defend thee under His wings, .and thou shalt be safe uniler His feathers : His failhfuliic;'3 and truth shall be thy shield .and buckler. Thou sh.alt not be afraid for any terror by night : nor for the aiTOVV that flieth by d.ay : for the pestilence that walketh in dark- ness : nor for the sickness that dcstroyeth in tlio noonday. (iBuening IpraiJCu. 215 attain everlasting joy and felicity ; Jes0s Cheist our Lord. Amen. through IT A Prayer for the Royal Family. ALMIGHTY God, the Fountain of all goodness, -L\- we luimbly beseech Thee to bless Albert Edward Prince of Wales, the Princess of Wales, and all the Royal Family : Endue them with Thy Holy Spirit ; enrich them with Thy heavenly grace ; prosper them with all happiness ; and bring them to Thine everlasting kingdom ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. IT A Prayer fur the Clergy and People. ALMIGHTY and everlasting God, AVlio alone -^-J^ workest great marvels ; Send down upon our Bishops, and Curates, and all Congregations committed to their charge, the healthful Spirit of Thy grace ; and that they may truly please Thee, pour upon them the continual dew of Thy bless- ing. Grant this, O Lord, for the honour of our Advocate and Mediator, Jesus Christ. Amen. IT A Prayer of St. Chnjsoslom. ALMIGHTY God, Who hast given us grace at ~L\. this time with one accord to make our common supplications unto Thee ; and dost pro- mise, that when two or three are gat*hered together in Thy Name Thou wilt grant their requests : Fulfil now, O Lord, the desires and petitions of Thy servants, as may be most ex- pedient for them ; granting us in this world knowledge of Thy truth, and in the world to come life everlasting. Amen. Ti 2 Cor. xiii. ^T^HE grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and -J- the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost, be with us all evermore. Amen. .1 Prymcr Version of foiinceiitli century. [.!/. A', ill. I. -I * Matitis and 1-ve ""£■ [1549 only). " ALMYGHTI god, euerlastynge, that aloune -^^ dust many wondres, schewe the spirit of heelful grace upon bisschopes thi seruauntis, and vpon alie the congregacion betake to hem : and jeete in the dewe of thi blessynge that thei plese euermore to the in trouthe. Bi crist oure lord. So be it. Here endeth the Order of * Evening Prayer throughout the Year. For Thou art my strong rock, and my castle : be Thou also my guide, and lead me for Thy Name's sake. Into Thy hands I commend my spirit : for Tliou hast redeemed me, Lord, Thou God of truth. I will lay me down in peace, and take my rest : for it is Thou, Lord, only that make.st me dwell in safety. " Such are words from the Psalms of David whioli may be taken as a Scriptural comment upon this short but condensed Collect. They shew us how literally the latter must be taken if we are to enter into its true spirit : how much solemn reference to the present and the future may be drawn into the compass of a few words of prayer : and what a fulness of devotion is contained in even the shortest of those forms which have come down to us as tlie day-by-day utterances of the Church of God for so many ages. To meet objections which were made to the words of this prayer, Bishop Cosin has altered it in his Durham Book to "Lighten the darkness of our hearts, we beseech Tiiee, O Lord, by Thy gracious visitation, and of Thy great mercy . . . from all terrors and dangers of the night ..." Bishop Wren proposed, "Lighten the darkness, we beseech Thee, Lord, that the night will bring upon us, and by Thy great mercy defend us from all dangers of the same, for the love of Thy only Son, our Saviour, Jesus Clirist. " Happily the ancient words were retained. The peculiar fitness of these words to end a Service which is really offered in the Evening is so great, that one cannot wonder at the reluctance shewn by the Clergy and People to add on the Intercessory Prayers which now follow. And although the Rubric directing these prayers to be used after the Anthem is not inserted in the Evening Service, its omis- sion by no means weakens the force of what has been said in the Notes on Morning Prayer as to such a termination of the Daily Service. AT MORNING PRAYER ^ " Upon these Feasts ; Christmas Day, the Epijjhani/, Saint Matthias, Easter Day, Ascension Day, Whit- sun Day, Saint John Baptist, Saiut James, Saint Bartholomeu; .Saint ilalthen:. Saint Simon and Saint /ifrfc. Saint Andrew, and upon Trinity Sunday, shall be sung or said *at Jlorning Prayer, instead of the Apostles' Creed, this Confession of our Chris- tian Faith, commonly called The Creed of Saint Athanasius, by the ilinister and people standing. "Y^THOSOEVER will be saved: «i™™°l'^"'^"- VV before all things it is neces- sary that he hold the Catholick Faith. I 5« note below. J immediately after Beiiedictus, this Confessiou. etc. [1549-1662!. <- Said (Inily. Prime 'Symbolum Athanasii. QUICUNQUE vult salvus esse : ante omnia opus est ut teneat catholicam fidem. THE ATHANASIAX CREED. Upon these Feasts] It was the ancient usage of the Church of England to sing the " Symbolum Athanasii," or "Psalm Quicnnqiie," every day after the Psalms at Prime. It was sung autiphonally, as a dogmatic Christian Psalm or Canticle, and not in the manner of a Creed, the Apostles' Creed being used at the same service as the actual Confession of Faith. In tlie first English Prayer Book, that of 1549, it was directed to be said ou si.K Festivals, those of Christmas, Epiphany, Easter, Ascension, Pentecost, and Trinity : and seven Saints' days were added in 155'2, so as to make thirteen days altogether. In the Bejormed Breviary of Quignonez, and in the JloJern Roman Breriary, it is appointed for use on Sundays ; the recitation of it being thus a weekly instead of a monthly one. In the Eastern Cliurch the Athanasian Creed is not recited in any of the Services, but is placed at tlie end of the Office Book much in the same manner as the "Thirty-nine Articles of Religion " used to be printed at the end of the Book of Common Prayer. The Creed does not appear iu the earlier English Prymers, but vernacular translations of it are extant of as ancient a date as the tenth centurj'. [Lambeth Lib. 427 : Bodl. Lib. Douce, 258.] The English of the version in the Prayer Book is substantially the same as that of Bishop Hil- scy, which was printed in the Prymer of 1539. rnmmonbj called The Creed 0/ Saint Athanasius] This popular title is used in the medic-cval Breviaries, but the most ancient forms in which the title is found are "Hymnus Athanasii de Fide Trinit.atis," as in the Utrecht Psalter, or "Fides Catho- lica Sancti Athanasii, " as in many ancient Psalters. Although the name of St. Athanasius has been associated with it for twelve hundred years, it cannot be certainly traced back to him as its author : and there is little probability that it was origin.ally written iu Greek, the language in which all the known works of St. Athanasius were written, since no extant Greek MS. of it is more than four hundred years old, and none is mentioned by any writer before A.D. 1200, while there are Latin MSS. of it that date through every age as far back as the fifth century, or to within a century of the time of St. Athanasius himself. It is probalile that it was called "Fides Sancti Athanasii Pr.Tsulis,"as it w.is by the Council of Autun about A.D. C70, because it expresses the doctrines for which St. Athanasius contended so learnedly and energetically against Arius and the Arians, for whicli he suffered so much, and of which he was the greatest defender. The real autlior appears to have been some theologian of the Western Church, the Bishop of a diocese in France, in the early part of the fifth century. This beautiful and exact dogmatic Canticle is found in all such early Psalters as contain any Canticles beside the Psalms of David. Among these are the Vienna Psalter, which is said to have been presented by the Emperor Charlemagne to t'.ie CJhurch of Bremen, and which is believed to have been written in tlio latter part of tho eighth century ; and the Utrecht Psalter, once the treasure of an English Church Library, which is of an even earlier date, and is assigned by some high palajographical authorities to the sixth century.' There exist also numerous early commentaries upon it, in some of which the whole of the Creed is extant in substantially the same Latin text as that printed above, various readings being few and of little importance. Of such commentaries there are known to be forty which were written before A.D. 1215, and sixteen of these were written before A.D. 800. Among them m.-iy be mentioned anonymous commentaries which are preserved in the Library of Troyes [804 (a), 804 (;3), 1979], in the British Museum Library [Add. MSS. 24,902], in the National Library at Paris [Bibl. Nat. 1012], and in the Vatican. [Mai's Script. Vet. Xora. Collect, ix. 396.] These MSS. were all written in the ninth or tenth centuries, but there is strong reason to believe th.at they are transcripts of still earlier MSS., just as the earliest Bibles, those of the fourth and fifth centuries, were also transcribed from older MSS. There is, however, a commentary wdiich can be assigned to a particidar autlior, and thus to a particular date, the Com- mentary of Venantius Fortunatus, which he wrote about A.D. 570, previously to his consecration as Bishop of Poictiers. Of this eight JIS. copies are known ; and as the author com- ments upon the Creed verse by verse, they ofler very valuable evidence as to the text of it at that early date. The preseuce of this Canticle among the other Canticles and the Psalms in all tlie ancient Psalters indicates that it was used in Divine Service at the time v\hen these Psalters were written : and as the Utrecht Psalter which was written for use in the Church of England contains the Quicunque Vult and all the Canticles of the Old and New Testament which were so used, it maybe concluded that this " Confession of Faith'' was as certainly used as the Te Deum in the English Church of those early days. A Canon of the C4allican Cliurcli, passed at Autun [A.D. 661-673], enjoined ou the Clergy the recitation of the " Fides Sancti Athanasii ; " and it is thought by some critics that an earlier Canon, possibly of the sixth century, found in two MSS. at the Vatican, which contains an injunction as to learning by heart the " Prides Catholica," refers under that title to the Quicunque: the inference being that this was for tlie purpose of its recitation in Divine Service. There is also extant at the end of tlie Venerable licde's abbreviated Psalter a prayer which ho composed for the monks of Jarrow to use after the recitation of the Athanasian Creed in Divine Service ; and as Bcde died in A.D. 735, this shews that its use had been adopted at least in the eiglith century iu the Cluireli of England. At a rather later date the Clergy were directed to explain the Creed to the L.-iity, and inter- linear Anglo-Saxon versions and glosses of it arc found which were olniuusly intended, like the vernacnl.ar versions of tlie Apostles' Creed, for laymen's use. It may therefore be con- eluded that the Athanasian Creed has been used in Divine Service by the Cliurch of England for considerably more than a thousand years, and probably since the sixth century. ' .SVe the " Report" of Sir Tlinnms nurTua Ilavly, Deputy KucpLi- of tbo I'tiblic HccordB, on " tlie Atli.iiia.sian Crenl in conneetioii with tlic Utrecht I'snlter," inesciitcd to tho Master of the Kolls, iiml imblislied in 1873. 3t joining lptaj)er. 2 17 " Which Faith except every one do keep * whole and undcfiled : without doubt he shall perish everlastingly. 'And the Catholick Faith is this : That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity ; ''Neither confounding the Persons : nor dividing the Substance. 'For there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son : and another of the Holy Ghost. ■' But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, is all one : the Glory equal, the Majesty co-eteruaL Such as the Father is, such is the Son : and such is the Holy Ghost. ^ The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate : and the Holy Ghost uncreate. '' The Father incomprehensible, the Son incom- prehensible : and the Holy Ghost incompre- hensible. ' The Father eternal, the Son eternal : and the Holy Ghost eternal. And yet they are not three eternals : but one eternal. a Deut. 4. 3. Rev. 22. 18, 19. Acts IV 46. 2 Julm 9. b holy [1549-1663]. f Mark 12. 32. Matt. 28. 19. d I Pet. I. 2. 2 Cor. 13. 14. I John 5. e Matt. 3. 16, 17. /John I. I. 14. & 10. 30. & 16. 13-15. Comf. Isa. 6. 1-3, with John 12. 40. 41. & Acts 28. 25, 26. g Acts 17. 24. 20. Jolm I. I, 3. Job 33. 4- A Job 139 7- Im. a(>U. [HILSKY'S Prifner, 1539.) i Isa. 63. 16. Heb. I. 8- & 9. 14- Ps. 90.2. Quam nisi qui.sque integram, inviolalamque servaverit : absque dubio in asternum peribit. Fides autem catliolica hajc est, ut unum Dei.m in Trinitate : ct Trinitatem in Unitate venere- mur. Neque confundentes personas : neque substan- tiam separantes. Alia est enim persona Patris, alia FiLii : alia Spiritus Sanctl Sed Patris, et Filii, et Spiritu.s Sancti, una est Divinitas : Bequalis gloria, coffitema majestas. Qualis Pater, talis Filius : talis Spiritus Sanctus. Increatus Pater, increatus Filius : increatus Spiritus Sanctus. Immensus Pater, immensus Filius : immensus Spiritus Sanctus. .^ternus P^vter, seternus Filius : aeternus Spiritus Sanctus. Et tamen non tres seterni : sed unus aeternus. By whom this formulary was actually composed is still, and perliaps always will be, a matter of conj'ecture. In ^VATER- LANc's History of llie AUianasian Creed he maintains the opinion that its author was St. Hilary of Aries, who died A. D. 449. Harvey, in his History and Tlieoloyy of llie Tliree Creeds, gives his reasons for supposing that it was written by Victricius, Bishop of Rouen, about A.D. 401. Ommaney comes to the conclusion that "of all persons to whom the Quicunque has been assigned, St. Vincent of Lerins " [d. A.D. 450] "is tlie only one to whom it can be assigned witli any degree of probability." But at present there is no sufficient evidence to enable any writer to deal in a satisfactory manner witli the question of its authorship, and all that can be said is that it was jirobably composed by some Gallican theologian iu the first half of the fifth century.' by the Minister and people standing] In his revised Prayer Boolt Bishop Cosin lias substituted for these wtu-ds ' ' one verse by the priest, and another by the people ; or in Colleges, and where there is a Quire, by sides." This was the ancient mode of saying or singing it. Whosoever will be suvedl St. Augustine, in liis Treatise on Faith and Works, says, "Not only is a good life inseparable from Faith, but Faith itself is a good life." Tliis illustrates the assertion of the Creed that "before all things it is necessary to hold the Catholic Faith.'' For faith necessarily precedes practice : "Without faith it is impossible to please God : for he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a Kewarder of them that diligently seek Him." [Heb. xi. 6.] Now, the belief that " God is" includes far more than a mere assent to the fact of His existence. To a mind capable of logical reflection, many corollaries must necessarily hang on to this fundamental axiom ; the state- ment of such corollaries forms a more or less developed Creed ; and thus belief in a Creed as the logical extension of the most primary truth becomes necessary to salvation, or " coming to God," here and hereafter. wliole and undejiled] The sin of not keeping the Catholic Faith whole and undefiled can only be committed by those who know what it is iu its integrity, and wilfully reject some portion of it : "every one" must therefore nie.an every one who has come to such a knowledge of the Faith, without asserting anything respecting those who are ignorant of it. This is simply, therefore, a declaration that heresy, or a wil- ful rejection of any part of the CathoHo Faith, comes within ' The fuUest historical accomit of this formulary is to be foiiml in Ommaxey's Atlmnasiaii Ciceil, an Exavliuation of Reccvt Theories respecthot Its Dale and Origin, 1875 : and tlie same author's Earhi History of tlii: Athanasian Creed, 1880. A large nnd valu.ablo collection of Scriiitnr.-il and Patristic quotations in illustratiun of it will be found set out verse by verse in Radoliffe's Athanasian Creed llhistrated by Parallel Passages, 1844. the condemnation declared by our Lord, "He that believeth not shall be damned." [Mark xvi. 16.] Those are in danger of this condemnation who have learned that there is a Trinity in Unity, Three I'ersons in One God, and yet wilfully reject the doctrine : but many believe this faithfully who have not sufficient education to follow out the doctrine into its con- sequences and necessary corollaries, as afterwards stated. Ou the other hand, those who understand these corollaries and reject them run into practical heresy. That ive loorsJiijj] The actual sense of this verse may be stated in other words as being, "The Catholic Faith is this, that the God Whom we worship is One God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity." Yet it is also true that as the end of all right Belief is right Worship, so the worship which alone can be right is that which is founded on the Catholic Faith as here stated. Persons, . , Substanee] "Person "isawordwhichmarksthe individual Unity of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost; "Substance" a word which marks their collective Unity. The latter word, which is synonymous with "Essence," or "Nature," comprehends all the essential qualities of Deity, or that which God is ; Eternity, Un- createdness, Omnipotence, Omnipresence, are some of these essential qualities belonging to Deity, and not belonging to any other kind of being. To "divide the Substance " is to assert that these essential qualities, or any of them, belong to either Person of the Godhead separately from, or in a different degree from, the other Persons. Sabellius [a.d. 250] originated, in its most definite form, the heresy of "confounding the Persons," by declaring that Father, Sou, and Holy Ghost were but three names, aspects, or manifestations of one God. Arius [a.d. 320] "divided the Substance " by alleging th.at the First Person existed before the other two Persons of the Blessed Trinity ; thus attribut- ing the essential quality of Eternity to One, and denying that it belonged to the others. These two errors lie at the root of all others ; and the following twenty verses of the Creed are an elaboration of the true doctrine, in a strict form of language, as a fence against them. incomprehensible'] This word is represented in modern English by the word Omnipresent. In Bishop Hilsey's translation of the Creed he uses the word "immeasurable," which better answers to the Latin immensus. The word "incomprehensible" has now the disadvantage of a meta- physical as well as a phj'sical sense ; but when the Prayer Book was translated, it probably had only the latter meaning, expressing " that which cannot be gi-asped by, or contained within, any space." It is only a strict form of stating the primary notion that " God is everywhere." "If I climb up into heaven, Thou art there : if I go down to hell. Thou art there also. If I take the wings of the morning : and remain in the uttermost parts of the sea ; even there also 2l8 at horning )[i?caj)Ct. " As also there are not three iucompreheusibles, nor three uncreated : but one uncreated, and one incomprehensible. * So likewise the Father is Almighty, the Son Almighty : and the Holy Ghost Almighty. And yet they are not three Almighties : but one Almighty. ' So the Father is God, the Son is God : and the Holy Ghost Is God. And yet they are not three Gods : but one God. "■So likewise the Father is Lord, the Sox Lord : and the Holy Ghost Lord. And yet not three Lords : but one Lord. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity ; to acknowledge every Person by Himself to be God and Lord ; ' So are we forbidden by the Catholick Religion : to say, There be three Gods, or three Lords. -^ The Father is made of none : neither created, nor begotten. *' The Sox is of the Father alone : not made, nor created, but begotten. * The Holy Ghost is of the Father, and of the Son : neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding. So there is one Father, not three Fathers ; one Son, not three Sons : one Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts. 'And in this Trinity none is afore, or after other : none is greater, or less than another ; * But the whole three Persons are co-etenial together : and co-equal. ' So that in all things, as is aforesaid : the Unity in Trinity, and the Trinity in Lenity is to be worshipped. '" He therefore that will be saved : must thus think of the Trinity. J Jer. 23. 24- 6. 3. Exod. 3. * Job 33. 4. Rev. I. 8, & 15. 3. & 19. 6. Matt. 12. 31, 32. Geii. 17. I. c Exod. 20. 2. 3. Eph. I. 3. I Tim. 3. 16. Acts 5. 3, 4. rf Matt. 11.25. Acts 10. 36. 2 Cor. 3. 17. Zecb. 14. 9. t IJeut. 6. 4. 4. 5. <>■ Lph. /].Am 5. 26. g JollH 5. 26, 1.5- Heb. h Jolm 14. 26 ii5. t I Cor. 12. 6, II Col. 3. II. t John S. 53. /Matt. 4. 10. 2 Tliess. 3- 5. Rev. 4-8. Sicut non tres increati, nee tres immensi : sed unus increatus, et unus immensus. Similiter omnipotens Pater, omuipotens Filius : omnipotens Spiritus Sanctus. Et tamen non tres omnipotentes : sed unus omnipotens. Ita Deus Pater, Deus Filius : Deus Spiritus Sanctus. Et tamen non tres Dii : sed unus est Deus. Ita DoMiNus Pater, Dominus Filius : Domi- Nus Spiritus Sanctus. Et tamen non tres Domini : sed unus est Dominus. Quia sicut singillatim unamquamque Personam Deuji et DojiiNUM confiteri Christiana veritate compellimur : Ita tres Deos aut Dominos dicere, catholica religione prohibemur. Pater a nullo est factus : nee creatus, nee genitus. Filius a Patre solo est : non factus, nee creatus, sed genitus. Spiritus Sanctus a Patre et Filio : non factus, nee creatus, nee genitus, sed procedens. Unus ergo Pater, non tres Patres ; unus Filius, non tres Filii : imus Spiritus Sanctus, non tres Spiritus Sancti. Et in hac Trinitate nihil prius aut posterius : nihil majus aut minus. Sed tota3 tres personce : coaeternse sibi sunt et coaequales. Ita ut per omnia, sicut jam supra dictum est, et Unitas in Trinitate : et Trinitas in Unitate veneranda sit. Qui vult ergo salvus esse : ita de Trinitate sentiat. shall Thy hand lead me : and Thy right hand shall hold me." [Ps. cxxxix. 7-9.] Yet it is true that a meaning not intended in the Creed has developed itself through this change of language, for the Nature of God is as far beyond the grasp of the niind as it is beyond the possibility of being contained \vithin local bounds. For like as v;e are compelled'] The Creed here declares the Divinity of each several Person of the Blessed Trinity to be so clearly set fortli in "the Christian Verity," that is, in the Canon of Holy Scripture as received by tlie Church, that there is no escape for tlie reason from such a conclusion ; — we are compelled to believe, by the force of the evidence which God has vouchsafed us in the Holy Bible. It would l)e easy to she«-, at length, how literally true this is ; but the marginal references appended to the text arc intended to direct the reader to such evidence, and to supersede, by his private study, the necessity for occupyiug space here with the details of the Scriptural argument. 80 are we forbkldcn hij the Catholic!: Religion] [1] Tlic evidence of doctrine is contained in the Holy Scriptures ; tlie consequences, deductions, and inferences, which may be made from the contents of Holy Scripture, must be under the con- trol of the Church. The one teaching us clearly th.at each Person of the Blessed Trinity possesses in Himself the in- herent essential qualities of the Divine Nature, the other for- bids us to draw any false conclusions from the truth thus revealed. [2] The final interpretation of Holy Scripture rests not witli the individual Christian, but with tlie collective Christian body ; and where that collective Christian body has set forth an interpret.ation, the individual Christian will be, to s.ay the lea-st, unsafe in adopting, or wishing to adopt, any other. [.3] The "Catholic Religion" respecting the Unity of the Trinity liad been clearly decided and set fortli at the General Councils held before this Creed was written. The Holy Ghoft is of the Father, and of the Son] The intro- duction of the words et Filio into this Creed shews that the doctrine of the Double Procession of the Holy Ghost was received at a very early date, although "Filioque" was not added to the Nicene Creed until the sixth century. The statement of it in this place is of a more general character than in the Nicene Creed [(/. v.], but it is rejected by the Eastern Church. He therefore that vill he saved : must thus think of the Trinity] This practical or saving importance of a right Faith in the Holy Trinity, may be seen [I] from the manner in which the doctrine lies at the foundation of all otlier doctrine ; [2] by the fact tliat our Lord made it the very fountain of spiritual life, when He connected the invocation of the Holy Trinity essentially with Holy Baptism ; and [3] by the place which it occupies in moulding all the forms of Christian worship. Nevertheless, this verse of the Creed must not be taken as meaning that no person can be saved except he lias an intellectual apprehension of the doctrines liero set forth about the Blessed Trinity. Intellectual apprehension of doctrine is confined to educated minds, which liavo the faculty of form- ing opinions about trutli, as well as of believing it. In what- ever degree, then, opinions accompany Faith, they must be consistent with the statements here made respecting God, in each several Person, and in one Indivisible Trinity. It is one of the responsibilities attached to the possession of intellect, and its developement by education, that it bo not suffered to go out of its province, professing to diseorer where it cannot even ohservr, or to reason where it lias no premisses. The highest intellect cannot form any opinion about God that can possibly bo true, if it is not consistent with what He Himself has told us ; and the highest operation of intellect is to train itself into consistency with the Supreme Mind. at e^omiuQ li?raj)er. 219 " Furthermore, it is necessary to everlasting sal- vation : that he also believe rightly the Incarna- tion of our LoKD Jesus Christ. * For the right Faith is, that we believe and confess : that our Lord Jesus Ciikist, the Son of God, is God and Man ; ■■ God, of the Substance of the 1'^ather, begotten before the worlds ; and Man, of the Substance of His Mother, born in the world ; ''Perfect God, and perfect Man : of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting ; 'Equal to the Father, as touching His God- head : and inferior to the Father, as touching His Manhood. ■^ Who although He be God and Man : yet He is not two, but one Christ ; ^One ; not by conversion of the Godhead into llcsh : but by taking of the Manhood into God ; ''One altogether; not by confusion of Substance : but by unity of Person. 'For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man : so God and Man Ls one Christ ; *Who sufl'ered for our salvation : descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead. 'He ascended into heaven, He sitteth on the right hand of the Father, God Almighty : from whence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. "At Whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies : and shall give account for their own works. "And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting : and they that have done evil into everlasting fire. ■'This is the Catholick Faith : which except a man believe faithfully, «■ he cannot be saved. ii Hub. 2. 3, Ronl. I. 3-4. 1 Jolin 4. i 1 Jolm s. =■!. & ;. 3). I Tiiii. 3. 16. fG.lI. 4. 4. Col. t. 17. & 3. 9. Luke 3. 6, 7, II. ri lahii I. 1. 14. Mil). I. 8. & 3. 14, Luke 3. 53. & 34. 30. f Zech. 13. 7. 10. 30. & Phil. 3. s-7. John 14. 38. /Mall. 16. 16. i' riiil. 2. ;. Heb, < John 1 A Isa. 53. 4. 3. 10 Luke 33. 42, 43. I Cor. 15. 3, 4. / Luke 34. 51. Pet. 3. 21. 23. ; Tliess. 4. 16. ; Thcss. I, 7-10. wAl. .irfrffr;*:/. Patris « Job 19. 35-37. Isa, 26. 19. 3 Cor. S. 10. o Malt. 16. 27. & 23. 34-46. Dan. 13. 3. fi 3 Thess. 3. 15. Jude 3. I John 5. 12. & 2. 23. Mark 16. 16. 7 a'lri stead/itstly. [Hilsey.] Sed necessarium est ad setemam salutem : ut incarnationem quoquo Domini iiostri Je.su Christi fidelitor crcdat. Est ergo fides recta, ut credanms et confitea- niur : quia Dominus noster Jesu.s Christus, Dei Filius, Deus et Homo est. Deus est ex substantia Patris ante sajoula genitus : et homo est ex substantia inatris in siBculo natus. Perfectus Deus, perfectus homo : ex anima rationali et huraana carne subsistens. iEqualis Patei secundum Divinitatem : minor Patre .secundum Humanitatem. Qui licet Deus sit et Homo : non duo tamen, sed unus est Christus. Unus autem, non conversione Divinitatis in carnem : sed assumptione humanitatis in Deum. Unus oinnino, non confusione substantioe : sed imitate personiB. Nam sicut anima rationalis et caro unus est homo : ita Deus et Homo unus est Christus, Qui passus est pro salute nostra, descendit ad inferos : tertia die resurrexit a mortuis. Ascendit ad coelos, sedet '"ad dexteram Dei Patris omnipotentis : inde venturus est judicare vivos et mortuos. Ad Cujus adventum omnes homines resurgere habent cum corporibus suis : et reddituri sunt dc factis propriis rationem. Et qui bona egerunt ibunt in vitam ;eternam : qui vero mala in ignem Eeternuni. Hajc est fides catholica : quam nisi quisque fide- liter firmiterque crediderit, salvus esse non poterit. Furthermore, it is necessary to everlasting salvation] The latter part of the Atlianasian Creed may be said to be a logical exposition of the second member of tlie Apostles' Creed, and especially with reference to the two Natures of our Blessed Lord, the union of which is called the " Incarna- tion." God, of the Substance of the Father] The many heresies respecting the Nature of our Blessed Lord entailed on the Church a necessity for the greatest strictness of expression ; and whether God the Son was of the same Substance with the Father, eternally begotten, or whether He was of a similar Substance, and a created being, was the great question which had to be decided by the Cluircli, time after time, as one form and another of the latter opinion arose, throughout the first ages. The voice of the Church never faltered, but always declared that the belief here expressed was the Faith once for all delivered to the Saints, and handed down from the Apostles to later times. It was this contest of heresy with the ortho- dox Faith that originated the minute definition into which the Athanasian Creed runs ; and however unnecessary it m.ay seem to those who willingly receive the true doctrine, yet it must be remembered that heresy never dies ; and that hence this minute accuracy is a necessary bulwark of the truth. Also, th.-it we m.ay be very thankful "the right Faith" has not now to be built up. but only to be defended. Perfect God, and perfect Ma n] Our Lord Jesus, in both of His two Natures, has all the essential qualities which belong to each : Eternity, Uncreatedness, Omnipresence, Almightiness, Divine Will, and all other attributes of the Divine Nature ; Body, Soul, Human Will, and all other attributes belong- ing to the Human Nature. These two Natures are as entirely united in the One Being, Christ, as the body and the soul are united in the one being, man. This Union was first effected when the Son of God beg.au to be the Son of Man in the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and it has never been broken since. When the Body of the Crucified Saviour was laid in the tomb, it was kept from corruption by the continuance of its Union with the Divine Nature : and when His Soul descended into hell, the Divine Nature was still united to it also, enabling it to triumph over Satan and Death ; when the Soul and Body of Christ were united together again, and ascended into Heaven, it was in conjunction with the Divine Nature that they ascended, to sit as Perfect God and Perfect Man at tlie right hand of the Father. And in the same two, but united Natures, Christ our Lord w-ill come to judge the quick and the dead. life everlasting . . . aw?arf(Hf7/!-f] These words, awful as the latter part of them is, are the words of our Lord, "The King shall s.ay unto them on His right hand, Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world . . . also unto them on the left hand. Depart from Me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, pre- pared for the devil and Iiis angels. . . . And these shall go away into everlasting punishment ; but the righteous into life eternal." [Matt. xxv. 34, 41, 46.] This is the Catholick Faith : which except a man believe faithfullij, lie cannot be sored] This verse also is founded on words of our Lord, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that believeth not shall be damned. ' [Mark xvi. 16.] And these severe words of His are the more striking from the fact of their utterance immediately before His Ascension to Heaven, lifting up His hands and blessing His disciples. It will be observed that the word _^nH(Ver in tliis clause is not representee! in our translation. Waterland sa3-s [Critic. Hist. V. X.] that our translators followed a Greek cojjy of the Creed, printed at Basle by Nicholas Bryliug. As this was reprinted by Stephens in 1565, it probably had some weight at the time. These words of the clause in this Greek copy are given as XIictt-us iriaTeiiari. Other Greek copies follow the Latin. It does not become the writer to say anything that may in the least lessen the force of such awful words. In the Creed which has been under notice, they are applied in close consistency with our Lord's first use of them, and they must be taken for all that they fairly mean. A word of caution 220 at horning H^caper. Glory be to the Fathee, and to the Son : and to tlie Holy Ghost ; As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. Gloria Patri, et FiLio : et Spieitui Sancto. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc et semper : et in ssecula saeculorum. may, however, be expedient ; reminding the reader of what has been before said about opinion and belief. A willing assent may be given to the more obvious statements of this Creed by many who are quite unable to enter upon the collateral and inferential statements deduced from them ; and "a man" may thus "believe faithfully" in the substantial truths of the Catholic Faith. With an expanded knowledge, an expanded faith is necessary : and all the statements of the Creed are so bound together, that they whose expanded knowledge of it is not thus accompanied, are in fact rejecting the fundamental Articles of the Faith, as well as those that seem subordinate only. It will be better in the next life for the ignorant, if they have believed according to the measure of their knowledge, than for those who have known much, but have believed little. It may be added that the last two verses, popularly called the "Damnatory Clauses," are found in every known manu- script of the Creed. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LITANY The Greek word Litaneia, meaning Prayer or Supplication, appears to have been used in the fourth century for devotions public or private ; but it soon came to have a narrower and more technical sense as applied to solemn acts of processional prayer. Whether St. Basil uses it in this sense, when in his 107th epistle he reminds the clergy of NeocKSarca that " the Litanies which they now practise " were unknown iu the time of their great apostle Gregory, and therefore might form a precedent for other salutary innovations, is a matter of opinion, on which Bingham and Palmer (the latter more expressly than the former) take tlie affirmative side, the Benedictine Editor and Keble [note to Hooker's Ecd. rol. v. 41, 2] taking the negative. But when we are told [Man.si, Goncil. iv. 1428] that the aged abbat Dalmatius had for many years never left his monastery, though repeatedly requested by Theodosius II. when Constantinople was visited by earth- quakes " to go forth and perform a Litany," there can be no doubt as to the meaning of the statement. The history, however, of Litanies, in the proper sense of the term, is rather Western than Eastern. \Ve find, indeed, in the Eastern Liturgy and Offices some four or five specimens of a kindred form of prayer, called Ertene, Stjnajile, etc., in which the Deacon bids prayer for several objects, sometimes beginning with " In peace let us beseech the Lord," and the people respond with " Kyric eleison," or with "Vouchsafe, Lord." The reader of Bishop Andrewes' Dei-ofioiis will be familiar with this type of prayers. [,SVe Oxford edition, pp. 5, 92.] And we have it represented iu the Western Church by two sets of " Preees " in the Ambrosian Missal, one used on the first, third, and fifth Sundays iu Lent, the other on the second and fourth. One of these begins, " Beseeching the gifts of Divine peace and pardon . . . we pray Thee, "etc., pro- ceeding to specify various topics of intercession with the response, "Lord, have mercy." The other is shorter, but in its imploring earnestness ("Deliver us. Thou Who deliver- edst the children of Israel . . . with a strong arm and a high hand. . . . O Lord, arise, help us, and deliver us for Thy Name's sake ") is even more interesting as a link between the Ectene and the Litanies of the West, an essential characteristic of which is their deprecatory and more or less penitential tone. Somewhat similar are the Mozarabic "Preees" for Lenten Sundays, with their burdens of "Have mercy," "We have sinned," etc. It may also be observed that " Preees," like the "Pacifieoe" of the Ambrosian rite, were anciently sung at Mass in Rome (at first only on days when the Gloria in Excelsis and Alleluia were omitted) until the ninth century. They formed an Eastern feature iu the service, and may be compared with the Preees of the Abbey of Fulda, which, like a Greek Ectene, intercede for various persons and classes, supplicate for a Christian and peaceful end, and have for their I'esponses, " We pray Thee, Lord, hear and have mercy," "Grant it, Lord, grant it ;" also with a series of Invocations, followed by "Tu ilium adjuva," occurring in an old form for an Emperor's coronation in Ml'RATORl, Lit. Horn. ii. 463. But to confine ourselves to the Western Litany. It became common among the Clallic churches in the fifth century, as it was in the East, to invoke the Divine mercy in time of exces- sive rain or drought by means of Rogations or processional supplications. But these, according to the testimony of Sidonius Apollinaris [v. 14], were often carelessly performed, with lukewarmness, irregularity, and infrequency — devotion, as he expresses it, being often dulled by the inter\'ention of meals. The shock of a great calamity wrought a change and formed an epoch. The illustrious city of Vienne, already famous in Christian history for the persecution under M. Aurelius [ErsEB. Eccl. Hist. v. 1], was troubled for about a year — probably the year 467-68 [Fleury, Eccl. Hist. xxix. c. 38] — with earthquakes. In the touching language of Gregory of Tours [Hint. Francor. ii. 34] the people had hoped that the Easter festival would bring a cessation of their dis- tress. "But during the very vigil of the glorious night, while Mass was being celebrated," the palace took fire, the people rushed wildly out of the church, and the Bishop Mamertus was left alone before the altar, entreating the mercy of God. He formed then a resolution, which he carried out in the three days before the Ascension festival, of celebrating a Rogation ^vitll special solemnity and earnestness. A fast was observed, and with prayers, psalmody, and Scripture lessons the people went forth in procession to the nearest church outside tlie city. Mamertus, says Fleury, had so appointed, "voulant (jprouver la fervour du peuple . . . mais le chemin parut trop court pour la d(5votion des fideles. " Sidonius imitated this "most useful example" in Auvergne at the approach of the Goths. He tells Mamertus [vi. ep. i. ] tliat the Heart-searcher caused the entreaties made at Vienne to be a model fcir imitation and a means of deliverance. Gregory of Tours writes that these Rogations were "even now celebrated throughout all churches with compunction of heart and con- trition of spirit ; " and tells how St. Quintianus in Auvergne, celebr.iting one in a drought, caused the words "If the heaven be shut up," etc. [2 Chron. vi. 26], to be sung as an anthem, whereupon at once rain fell ; how King Guntrani ordered a Rogation, with fasting on barley-bread and water, during a pestilence [Hist. Francor. ix. 21] ; how St. Gall insti- tuted Rogations in the middle of Lent [ibid. iv. 5]; how the Bishop of Paris performed them before Ascension, "going tlie round of the holy places" [ix. 5]. St. Cresarius of Aries [a.d. 501-542] in his Homily "de Letania" (it became usual so to spell the word) calls the Rogation days "holy and spiritual, full of healing virtue to our souls," and "regularly observed by the Church throughout the world ; " and bids his hearers come to church and stay through the whole Rogation service, so as to gain the full benefit of this "three days' healing process." The Second Council of Lyons [a.d. 567] ordered also in its sixth Canon that Litanies should be said in every church in the week before the first Sunday in November in the same manner as before Ascension Day. In order to estimate the comfort which these services then gave, one must take into account not only such afflictions as drought or pestilence, but the painful sense of confusion and iusecurity which in those days broi-uled over W^estern Europe, and which still speaks in some of our own Collects, imploring the boon of peace and safety. We cannot wonder that, while the Rogation Mass iu the Old Ciallican Missal speaks of " sowing in tears, to reap in joys," a Collect in the GalUcan Sacrameutary " iu Letanias " dwells on "the crash of a falling world." So it was that, as Hooker expresses it, "Rogations or Litanies were then the very strength, stay, and comfort of Ciod's Church." Council after Council — as of Orleans in 511, Tours in 567 — decreed Rogation observances in connection with a strict fast. But the Spanish Church, not liking to fast in the Paschal time, placed its Litanies in Lent, in Whitsun week, and in tlie autumn, while the Milanese Rogations were in the week after Ascension. We learn from the Council of Cloveshoo [a.d. 747] that the Eng- lish Church had observed the Rogations before Ascension ever since the coming of St. Augustine : and the anthem with which he and his companions approached Canterbury, ' ' We beseech Thee " (dt'precamiir te), "0 Lord, in Thy great mercy, to remove Thy wrath and anger from this city, and from Thy holy house, for we have sinned. Alleluia," was simply part of the Rogation Tuesday service in the Church of Lyons. [Martene, rfe ./!?(<. Ecd. Bit. iii. 520,] This urgent depre- catory tone, this strong "crying out of the deep," which expresses so marked a characteristic of the Litanies, appears again in another Lyons anthem for Rogations, "I have seen, I have seen the affliction of My people;" in the York suffrage, which might seem to be as old as the days of the dreaded heathen King Penda, " From the persecution by the Pagans and all our enemies, deliver us ; " and yet more strik- ingly in the Ambrosian, " Deliver us not into the hand of the he.ithen : Thou art kind. O Lord, have pity upon us ; encom- 222 an 3jntroDuction to tfjc ILitanj). jjass Thou this city, and let Angels guard its walls ; merci- fully accept our repentance, and save us, Saviour of tlie world ; In the midst of life we are in death : " although this latter antliem, so familiar to us, was composed on a different occasion by Kotker of St. Gall. [See Notes to Burial Office.] The strict rule which forbade in Rogation time all costly garments, and all riding on liorseback, may be illustrated by tlie decree of the Council of Mayence in 813, that all should "go barefoot and in sackcloth in the procession of the Great Litany of three days, as our holy fathers appointed." Tliis name, "Litania Jlajoi-," was thus applied in Gaul to the Rogations, but in Rome it has always been used (as it now is tliroughout the Roman Church) for the Litany of St. JIark's Day, which traces itself to St. Gregory the Great, and of which the Ordo Romanus says that it is not "in jejunio." In order to avert a pestilence, Gregory appointed a "seven- fold Litany," using the term for the actual processional com- pany, as the Litany of clergy, the Litany of laymen, that of monks, of virgins, of married women, of widows, of tlie poor and children ; and, in fact, tlie Roman Bishops did not adopt the Rogation Litany, properly so called, until the pontificate of Leo III., which began in 705. This was some fifty years after England, on the other hand, had adopted the Litany of St. Mark's Day as that which at Home was called the Greater. But although in strictness, as Hugh Menard says, "Litania ad luctuni pertinet," the Litany was not always confined to occasions of distress or of special humiliation. As early as the close of the fifth century the Gelasian Sacramentary, in its directions for Holy Saturday, had the following [Muratori, i. 546, 568] : "They enter the Sacristy, and vest themselves as usual. And tlie Clergy begin the Litany, and the Priest goes in procession, with those in holy orders, out of the Sacristy. Thej' come before the altar, and stand witli bowed Iieads until they say, ' Lamb of God, Who takest away the sins of the world.' " Then comes the blessing of the Paschal taper ; and after the series of lessons and prayers which follows it, tliey go in procession with a Litany to the fonts, for the baptisms : after which they return to the Sacristy, "and in a little while begin the third Litany, and enter the church for the Vigil Mass, as soon as a star lias appeared in the sky." And"so it became natural to adopt a form of prayer which took so firm a hold of men's afl'ections on various occasions when processions were not used. At ordinations, or at con- secrations, at the conferring of monastic habits, at coronations of Emperors, at dedications of churches, etc. , it became com- mon for the "school," or choir, to begin, or as it was techui- cally called, to "set on" (imponere) the Litany, — for the Subdeacon to "make the Litanies," — for the first of tlie Deacons to "make the Litany," that is, to precent its suffrages [Muratori, ii. 423, 426, 439, 450, 452, 458, 467], begin- ning with " Kyrie eleison," or with "O Christ, hear us." A Litany never came amiss : it was particularly welcome as an element of offices for tlie sick and dying : its terseness, energy, pathos, seemed to gather up all that was meant by " being instant in prayer." For some time tlie Litanies were devoid of all Invocations of Angels and Saints. Tlie Preces of Fulda simply asked God that the Apostles and Martyrs might "pray for us." But about the eighth century Invocations came in. A few Saints are invoked in an old Litany which Mabillon calls Anglo- Saxon [Maeillox's Vet. Anal. p. 168; comp. H.\ddan anil .Stcee.s' Councils, etc. ii. 81], and Lingard Armorican [Lino arc's .^nj/. Sax. Ch. ii. 386]. Names of Angels, with St. Peter or any other Saint, occur in another, which Mabil- lon ascribes to the reign of Charlemagne. Tlie Litany in the Ordo Romanus [/J/ft. ]'et. Pair. viii. 451] has a string of saintly names. As the custom grew, more or fewer Saints were some- timesinvoked according to the lengtliof the proces.siou ; "quan- tum sufficititer," says the Sarum Processional ; and the York, "secundum exigentiam itincris." The number was often very considerable : a Litany said after Prime at the venerable Abbey of St. Gcrniaiii des Pres liad, Marteue says [iv. 49], ninety-four .Saints originally: an old Tours form for visitation of the sick lias a list of Saints occupying more than four columns [ihhi. i. 859] : and a Litany of tlie iiintli century which Muratori prints, as "accommodated to tlic use of tlie Church of Paris, "has one hundred and twosnch Invocations. [Muratori, i. 74] The Invocations generally came between the Kyrie, etc., at the beginning, and the Deprecations which, in someform or other, constituted the most essential element of the Litany. I'.ilmcr thinks that the .space thus occuiiied had originally been filled by many repetitions of the Kyrie, such as the Eastern Church l.ivcd, ami the Council of Vaison in 529 had recommended ; and in consequence of which St. Benedict had applied the name of Litany to the Kyrie, just as, when Invocations had become abundant, the same name was popularly applied to them, which explains the plural form, " Litanise Sanctorum," in Roman books. Sometimes we find frequent Kyrics combined with still more frequent Invocations, as in a Litania Septena for seven subdeacons on Holy Saturday, followed by a Litania Quina and Terna. [Martene, i. 216.] A Litania Septena was used on this day at Paris, Lyons, and Soissons. The general divisions of Medifeval Litanies were — 1. Kyrie, and "Christ, hearus," etc. 2. Entreaties to each of the Divine Persons, and to the whole Trinity. 3. Invocationsof Saints. 4. Deprecations. 5. Obsecrations, "by the mystery," etc. 6. Petitions, 7. Agnus Dei, Kyrie, Lord's Prayer. 8. Collects. The present Roman Litany should be studied as it occurs in the jlissal, on Holy Saturday; in the Breviary, just before the Ordo Commendationis Animie ; and in the Ritual, just before the Penitential Psalms ; besides the special Litany which forms part of the Commendatio. The Litany of Holy Saturday is slioi't, having three deprecations and no Lord's Prayer. The ordinary Roman Litany, as fixed in the sixteenth century, names only fifty-two individual Saints and Angels. It is said on St. Mark's Day, and during Lent, in choir, and "extra chorum pro opportunitate temporis." The Litanies of the Mediajval English Church are a truly interesting subject. Procter, in his History of the. Common Prayer, p. 254, has printed an early Litany much akin to the Litany of York, and considered by him to be of Anglo- Saxon date. The Breviaries and Processionals exhibit their respective Litanies : and the ordinary Sarum Litany used on Easter Eve, St. Mark's Day, the Rogations, and every week- day in Lent (with certain variations as to the Saints invoked), occurs in the Sarum Breviary just after the Penitential Psalms. It is easy, by help of the Processionals, to picture to oneself the grandeur of the Litany as solemnly performed in one of the great churches which followed the Sarum or Y'ork rites. Take, for instance. Holy Saturday. The old Gelasian rula of three Litanies on that day was still retained. In Sarum a "Septiform Litany " was sung in the midst of the choir by seven boys in surplices (compare the present Roman Rubric, that the Litany on that day is to be sung by two chanters "in medio chori"); the Y'ork Rubric says, seven boys, or three where more cannot be liad, are to sing the Litany. It was called septiform, because in each order of saints, as apostles, martyrs, etc., seven were invoked by name. After "All ye Saints, pray for us," five deacons began the "Quinta-partitaLetania" intliesaineplaceftheY'^ork says, "Letaniam puerorum seqnatur Letania diaconorum"): but after " St. Mary, pray for us, "the rest was said in solemn procession to the font, starting, "ex australi parte ecclesice." First came an acolyte as cross-bearer, then two taper-bearers, the censer-bearer, two boys in siirplices with book and taper, two deacons with oil and chrism, two subdeacons, a priest in red cope, and the five chanters of the Litany. In these two Litanies the four addresses to the Holy Trinity were omitted. After the blessiug of the font, three clerks of liigher degree in red copes began a third Litanj', the metiical one m liich, Cassander says, was called Litania Norica, " Rex sanctorum Angelorum, totum mundum adjuva" (with which may be compared, as being also metrical, \\iiat Gibbon, vol. vii. p. 76, calls the "fearful Litany" for deliverance from the arrows of Hungarians): after the first verse was sung, the procession set forth on its return. In Y'ork the third Litany was sung Ijy three priests, and was not metrical. There were procca- sicuis every AVednesday and Friday in Lent (on other Lenten week-days the Lit.any was non-processional), the first words of the Litany being sung " before the altar, before the pro- cession started " {I'roeess. Sar.\ and the last Invocation lieing sung at the steps of the choir as it rctuiiied. In York, on Rogation Tuesday, tlic choir repeated after the chanter, pro- ccssionally, the Kyrie and Christe eleison with the Latin equivalents, " Doniine, miserere; Christe, mi.iflri/, •J32, 257, 258, 280, 800.) There is .ilso an engraving by Hollar of a similar procession, ten or twelve years later, in Ash.mole's Order of the Garter, v. 515. the Litany and prayers" in church every Wednesday and l''riday ; but the Litany of the procession, in Rogation week, was to be continued also, and the custom of "Beating the Bounds " of parishes on Ascension Day still in some sort represents it. [See Note on Rogation Days. ] The lifteentli canon of 1004 provides for the saying of the Litany in eluirch after tolling of a bell, on Wednesdays an-d Fridays. In the last re\'icw of the Prayer Book the words "to be sung or said" were substituted for "used" (both phrases having occurred in the Scotch Prayer Bookj, and are very carefully added — an erasure being made to give preced- ence to the word "sung"^in Cosin's Durham Book. The Litany was stimj by two Bishops at the coronation of George I. With regard to the place for saying or singing the Litany, the present Prayer liook in its rubric before the 51.st Psalm in tlie Commination, appears implicitly to recognize a peculiar one, distinct from that in which the ordinary offices are per- formed. As we have seen, the Injunctions of Edward, followed herein by those of Elizabeth, specified the midst of the Church : and Bishop Andrewes hacl in his chapel a/aldis- tory (folding-stool) for this purpose, between the western stalls and the lectern. So Cosin, as archdeacon of the East Riding in 1C27, inquired whether the church had "a little faldstool or desk, with some decent carpet over it, in the middle alley of the church, whereat the Litany may be said after the manner prescribed by the Injunctions ;" and in his first series of Notes on the Common Prayer he says, "The priest goetli from out his seat into the body of the church, and at a low desk before the cliancel door, called the faldstool, kneels, and says or sings the Litany. Vide Propli. Joel de medio loco inter jiortieiim et «//<(?-e," etc* Compare also the frontispiece to Bishop Spaekow's Ealionale, and to the Litany in Prayer Books of 1062, etc. Cosin gave such a faldstool to Durham Cathedral, which is constantly used by two priests ; and the Rubric of the present Coronation office speaks of two Bishops kneeling in the same manner at a faldstool to say the Litany. The custom doubtless signified the deeply supjjlica- tory character of this service. Finally, in the Durham Book the Rubric before the Litany ends with these words : "The Priest (or Clerks) kneeling in the midst of the Quire, and all the people kneeling, and answering as followeth. " In the present day there is a disposition to make the Litany available as a separate service. Archbishop Cirindall's order in 1571, forbidding any interval between Morning Prayer, Litany, and the Communion Service, w-as far from generally observed.^ At Winchester and AA'orcester Cathedrals the custom of saying the Litany some hours after Mattins has prevailed ; and we learn from Peck's Desiderata C'liriosa [lib. xii. no. 21] that in 1730 the members of Ch. Ch. Oxford, on Wednesdays and Fridays, went to Mattins at six, and to Litany at nine. The 15th Canon, above referred to, recognizes the Litany as a sejiarate office. Freedom of arrangement in tliis matter is highly desirable : and if it be said that the Litany ought to}irecede theCommunion, according to ancient precedent, instead of being transferred, as it some- times now is, to the afternoon, it may be replied that the Eucharistic Ectene of the East is not only much shorter than our Litany, but tar less plaintive, so to speak, in tone, and therefore more e^-idently congruous ■s\itli Eucharistic joy. The like may be said, on the whole, of the " Preces Pacificie " once used at Rome (as we have seen) in the early part of the Mass, and at Milan on Lenten Sundays : although indeed a Lenten Sunday observance could be no real precedent for all the Sundays in the year.^ Of the Puritan cavils at the Litan}', some will be dealt with in the Notes. One, which accuses it of perpetuating prayers which had but a temporary purpose, is rebuked by Hooker [Hooker's LWL Pol. v. 41, 4], and is not likely to be revived. He -takes occasion to speak of the "absolute " (i.e. finished) " perfection " of our present Litany •. Bishop Cosin, in his l)evotions, uses the same phrase, and calls it "this principal, and excellent prayer" (excellent being, in the English of his day, equivalent to matchless) ; and Dr. Jebb describes it as "a most careful, luminous, and comprehensive collection of the scattered treasures of the Universal Church." [Jebb's C/ioral Serrice, p. 423.] It may also be regarded as a comprehensive form of prayer * This note is found also in a Prayer Book in the Bodleian Library, which contains many annotations written about 1*355 by Bishop Duppa; and he .adds, " So ordered by the composers of this Book in imitation of the Lutheran Churches." 6 In fact, there is a direction exactly opposite in an Occasional Service of Queen Elizabeth's reign, exhorting the people to spend a quarter of an hour or more in private devotion lietween Morning Prayer and the Communion. ^ Sec also a note on the expanded KjTie eleison in the Communion Service. !24 an 3lntroDuction to tfjc Litany. which especially carries into practice the Apostolic injunction, "I exhort therefore that . . . supplications, prayers, inter- cessions ... be made for aU men." After the Acts of Adoration with which it opens, there foUow a number of " Deprecations," relating to the sins or dangers of national or individual life, from which we pray Christ, as our "Good Lord," to deliver us. After these the " Obsecrations " plead the acts and sufferings of our Redeemer, as each having an efficacious power of its own. Then come the " Petitions " or "Supplications," which are full of intercessory prayer, for the Sovereign and the Eoyal Family, for the Clergy, for the Sovereign's counsellors and agents in the government of the Kingdom and in the administration of justice, for all Cliristians, for all nations, for the increase of ourselves in love and obedience, for the advancement of all Christians in grace, for the conversion of those who are not yet in the way of truth, for persons in various troubles and dangers, for God's mercy to all men, and for our enemies ; the whole closing with a prayer for the Divine Blessing on all the labours of our hands, and for His forgiveness of our sins, negligences, and ignorances. Such a fulness of supplications, combined with the comparative familiarity and homeliness of its sub- jects, makes the Litany welcome to the lips of every age ; and it is none the less so in that it speaks a language of prayer which has been substantially that of our forefathers for twelve centuries. THE LITANY. IT *Here foUoweth the LITANY, or General Suppli- cation, to be sung or said after Morning Prayer upon '^Sundays, iVedttesdays, and Fridays, and at other times when it shall be eommanded by the Ordinary. OGOD the Father, of heaven : have mercy upon us miserable sinners. God the Father, of heaven : have mercy upon us miserable sinners. O God the Son, Redeemer of the world : have mercy upon us miserable sinners. God the Son, Redeemer of the world : have mercy upon us miserable sinners. O God the Holy Ghost, proceeding from the Father and the Son : have mercy upon u.s miser- able sinners. God the Holy Ghost, proceeding from the Father and the Son : have mercy upon us miser- able sinners. O holy, blessed, and glorious Trinity, three Persons and one God : have mercy upon us miserable sinners. holy, blessed, and. glorious Trinity, three Persons and one God : have mercy upon us miser- able sinners. Remember not. Lord, our offences, nor the offences of our forefathers ; neither take Thou vengeance of our sins : spare us, good Lord, spare Thy people, vs'hom Thou hast redeemed with Thy most precious blood, and be not angry with us for ever. SjMre us, good Lorik From all evil and mischief ; from sin, from (I Thf I.itittty and Siifrry the JCtiig's Majesty's liijitncticjts : eras is or shall leather, wise appointed by his IIij;hiiess. The Coniniimion Ser- vice was then to be begun on these days, after the Litany ended. c Sundays . . . by the Ordinary [■55=1. e Here followed the Invocations of Saints, which sometiines num- bered as many as two hundred; each Invocation. as "Sancte Paule," being followed by the Response, "Ora pro nobis," •P ATER de coelis Deus : miserere nobis. FiLi Redeniptor mundi Deus : miserere nobis. Spiritus Sancte Deus : miserere nobis. Sancta Trinitas, unus Deus : miserere nobis.' Ne reminiscaris, Domine, delicta nostra, vel parentum nostrorum : neque vindictam sumas de peccatis nostris. Parce, Domine, parce populo Tuo, quem redemisti pretioso sanguine Tuo : ne in seternum irascaris nobis. Ab omni malo : Libera nos, Domine. THE INVOCATIONS. hij the Ordinary] In the MS. of the Prayer Book the final words of the Rubric were originally written "by the Ordiii- arie: the Minister and People allkneelimj." The last six words are crossed out with a pen, perhaps with the idea that they excluded the use of the Litany in procession. O Ood the Father] The old Sarum Litany prefixes to this, "Kyrie Eleison, Christe Eleison : " then, "Christe, audi nos." The Roman has a complete Kyrie, with " Christe, audi nos ; Christe, exaudi nos." The Litany of Ordo Eonianus, and the Utrecht Litany, have also "Salvator mundi, adjuvanos. " The sense of the original Latin would be best brought out by, e.rj. "Son, Redeemer . . . Who .art God," etc. The four Invocations oflfer a very striking application of the statement with which the Athanasiau Creed opens, "And the Catholick Faith is this : That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity." Each of them is an act of solemn adoration passing into an act of prayer. 0/ heaven] i.e. from heaven, " de ccelis." The phrase comes from S. Luke xi. 13, 6 Harrip ^? oipavov, your Father Who heareth from heaven. [Comjh 2 Chron. vi. 21.] "Ex- audi . . . de ca'lis, " Vulg. miserahh' sinners] Added in 1544. proceedinfifrom'] Added in 1544. The Utrecht has "Spiritus Sancte, benit/ne Deus." holy, blessed] The fourth Invocation was thus ampli- fied in 1544. partly from the old Sarum antiphon after the Athanasian Creed, for Trinity week : " () beata et benedicta et gloriosa Trinitas, Pater et Filius et Spiritus ,^anctus. " It must be Ijorne in mind tliat the term Person, in reeard to the Holy Trinity, is not equivalent to "individual," as when it is applied to three men. When we say, "three Persons and one God," we mean, as the original Invocation shows, that the three are severally distinct, yet are one God. Remember not] Before 1544 these words formed part of the antiphon which was added to the Penitential Psalms as pre- fixed to the Litany. In the original, after "ne in sternum," etc., came, " et ne des hajreditatem tuam in jjerditionem : ne in setemum obliviscaris nobis." But there was also, just before the speci.al Deprecations, and after the Invocations of Saints, " Propitius esto : Parce nobis, Domine. ' The word "good" was inserted in 1544. The sins of fathers may be visited on children in temporal judgements. ijood Lord] It is much to be observed that this supplication and the whole of what follows down to the Kyrie is one con- tinuous act of worship offered to our Blessed Lord ; and it is this which gives the Litany such peculiar value in days when His Divinity is too often but faintly realized. THE DEPRECATIONS. From] These Deprecations, which in the old Litanies, as in the present Roman, were broken up into separate forms, each relating to one topic, were in 1544 combined in groups, as at pre- sent ; probably in order to give more intensity and energy to the " Deliver us." The like was done with the Obsecrations. nil evil] Sarum, York, Hereford, Carthusian, Dominican, and the old Ordo Romanus ; Litania Latina in Luther's Enchiridion, 1543. mischief] Added to the old form in 1544. sin] Added in 1544 from the Lit.any in the Primer of 1535. The Roman has it. and it is in Hermann of Cologne's Simplex 226 ^ht JLitanp. the crafts and assaults of the devil ; from Thy wrath, and from everlasting damnation, Good Lord, deliver its. « tSotli.j Ab insidiis diaboli : Libera . . . Ab infestationibus djemonuni : Libera . . . ["A Ventura ira : Libera . . .] A damnatione peri^etua ; Libera . . . From *all blindness of heart; from pride, vain-glory, and hypocrisy; from envy, hatred, and malice, and all uncharitableness, Good Lord, deliver us. <-Sar. ■'[Sorft.l 'Sat. - 'A ctecitate cordis : Libera . . . [''A peste superbias : Libera • . . ] 'Ab appetitu inanis glorias : Libera . . . Ab ira, et odio, et omni mala voluntate : Libera . . . From fornication, and all other deadly sin ; and from all the deceits of the world, the flesh, and A spiritu f ornicationis : Libera . . . the devil, Good Lord, deliver ns. From lightning and tempest; from plague, pestilence, and famine ; from battle and murder, and from sudden death, Good Lord, deliver 2cs. / [gotii.l A fulgure et tempestate : Libera . . . A subitanea et improvisa morte : Libera . . . [•^A subita et aeterna morte : Libera . . . ] ac Pia Delibeyatio, translated from German into Latin in 1545 ; liis Litany is nearly identical with that of Luther named above. crafts and assaults] Two distinct modes of diabolic attack, secret and open. So a Jewisli evening prayer, "Keep Satan from before and from behind ns. [Bible Educator, iv. 239.] Sarum Primer has, "from the awaitings of the fiend." [Comp. 2 Cor. ii. 11.] assaults] Not in York uor in Koiimn, but in Dominican. [Brev. Ord. Prredic] Thij wrath] Roman has this ; and so the Ordo Eomanus. York has "from the wrath to come." So it is in the Lyons Rogations, and in Carthusian. In Litanies for the Sick it \\'as common to deprecate "Thy wrath." [Martene, i. 858, etc.] The Narboune had " from Thy wrath greatly to be feared. " everlasfiiuj damnation] Sarum, Hereford, Utrecht, Cister- cian, Dominican, have "perpetual." [Comp. Roman, "a morte perpetua. "] If tlie force of this Deprecation can be evaded in the interests of Universalism, no words can retain any meaning. York combines "sudden and eternal death." blindness of heart] This, whicli is in Sarum and LUrecht, not in York nor Roman, was derived from the Vulgate of Eph. iv. 18, " propter ca^citatem cordis sui : " but the word IT (ipwffij' should rather be rendered " hardness " or " callousness." pride] York and Utrcclit more emphatically, "the plague of pride." Not in P^oman. The Carthusian has "the spirit of pride." rain-ylori/] Compare Sarum, "the desire of vain-glory." Not in Roman. hypocrisy] Added in 1544. envy] Added in 1544. We do not specif}' anger, as Sarum and York do. hatred] Here Sarum, York, Roman agree. malice] Sarum, York, Roman, Utrecht, Dominican, "all ill-will." fornication] Sarum, Roman, Carthusian have " the spirit of fornication. " The Sarum addition, "from all uncleanness of mind and body," is in Hereford, Utrecht, Carthusian, Dominican ; so York, "from all uncleannesses . . ." Sarum further adds "from unclean thoughts ; " so Dominican. deadly sin] In 1514 "all deadly sin." " Other " added in 1549. This plirase lias been more than ' once objected to. The Committee of the House of Lords in lfi41 suggested "grir.vous sin," doubtless from dislike of the Roman distinc- tion of mortal and venial sins, Tlie Puritan divines, at the Savoy Conference, made a similar suggestion, observing that the wages of sin, as such, were death. Tlie Bishops answered, " For that very reason, 'deadly ' is the better word." They therefore nmst liave understood the phrase to refer to all wilful .and deliberate sin. At tlic same time it must be remembered that among wilful sina there are degrees of hcinousness. " It would be introducing Stoicism into the (Jospel to contend that all sins were equal." [Dr. Pusey's Letter to Bishop of Oxford, p. liii.j deceits of the ivorbl, the flesh] Added in 1544 ; but York has " from fleshly desires." So Utrecht, Carthusian, "from wicked concupiHcence." " Deceits of the devil," in fact, is a repetition of "crafts of the devil " above. The deceits of the world, of course, mean "the vain pomp and glory" of it, the liollow splendour, the false attractiveness, the promises of satisfaction and of permanence, etc., which as the Apostle reminds us, have no reality. [1 .S. John ii. 17 ; coinp. 1 Cor. vii. 31.] liyhtninej and temjiest] Not in York nor Hereford. Roman has it ; and a Poictiers Litany [Martene, iii, 438] has, " That it may please Thee to turn a.wa.y malignitatem tempcstatum." Thunder- storms impelled St. Chad to repair to churcli, and omploj' him- self in prayer and psalmody ; being asked why he did so, he cited Psalm xviii. 13. [Bede'h Eccl. Hist. iv. 3.] There are two Oi'atioues "contra fulgura, "and one "ad repellendam tempes- tatem, " in Menard's edition of the Gregorian Sacramentary. plague, pestilence'] Sarum, York, Hereford, have not this Deprecation, which is in Roman. The Litany of 1535 had " from all pestilence. " So also a Tours Litany, "to remove pestilence or mortality from us ; " and St. Dunstan's Litany for Dedication of a Church has " from pestilence." famine] Not in Sarum, York, Hereford, but in Roman. In 1535 "from pestilence and famine." Dunstan's also "et fame." The I'leury Litany in Martene has "from all want and famine. " battle] York has "from persecution by Pagans, and all our enemies," like the Anglo-Saxon Litany. The Roman and Dominican deprecate "war." So Primer of 1535, and Her- mann. Dunstan's and Fleury mention slaughter. Laud says that the Puritans' olijection to the deprecation of famine and battle "is as ignorant as themselves." [ ICoci's, i. 12.] murder] Added 1544. Hermann has it. The Latin Book of 1560 has " latrocinio. " sudden death] So Sarum Primer has "sudden death and unadvised." The Roman agrees with the Sarum. So Her- mann, adding "evil." The same Deprecation is in the Roga- tions of Lyons. The Puritans objected that " the godly should always be prepared to die. " Hooker replies, in one of his most beautiful and thoughtful chapters [Eccl. I'ol. v. 4li], that it is lawful to "prefer one way of death before another ; ' that it is religion which makes men wish for a "leisurable ' departure ; that our pr.aj^er "importeth a twofold desire " — [1] For some "convenient I'cspite;" [2] If that be denied, tlien, at least, "that althougli death uncvpected bo sudden in itself, never- theless, in rcg.ird of our prepared miiuls, it, may not be .sudden." Archbishop iluttou, of York, liefure the Hampton Court Cnuferenec was held, explained this as implying a condition, "if it be Thy will," sujiposiiig "sudden " were taken simply ; but "sudden" might be taken as equivalent to "giving no time for repentance." The aversion of Lord Brook to this Deprecation, and his own terrilic instantaneous death by a shot from the great spire of Lichlield Cathedral, are w ell known. In a J'rayer Book in the Bodleian, "worn by the daily use" of Bishop Duppa, of Salisbury (whilo residing at Richmond, between the overthrow of K])i.sco]iacy and the Restoration), and containing marginal notes in his own hand, this comment occurs, " Vainly excepted against, because wo should always bo prepared for it : for by the same reason, wo should not pr.ay against any temptations." At the Savoy Conference the I'uritaus again raised tho old objection, and proposed to Cf)e litanp. 227 From all sedition, privy conspiracy and rebellion ; from all false doctrine, heresy, and schism ; from hardness of heart, and contempt of Thy Word and Commandment, Good Lord, deliver us. By the mystery of Thy holy Incarnation ; by Thy holy Nativity and Circumcision ; by Thy Baptism, Fasting, and Temptation, Good Lord, deliver w. By Thine Agony and Bloody Sweat ; by Thy Cross and Passion ; by Tliy precious Death and Per sanctse Incamationis Tuk ; mystcrium Libera . . . ["Per sanctamNativitatemTuam: Libera . . .] 'Per sanctam Circumcisionem Tuam : Libera Per Baptismum Tuum : Libera . . . Per Jejunium Tuum : Libera . . . Per Crucem et Passionem Tuam : Libera . . . Per pretiosam Mortem Tuam : Libera . . . read, " from dying suddenly and unprepared. " The Bishops replied, " From sudden death, la as good as from dying suddenly ; which we therefore pray against, that we may not be unprepared." [Cardwell, Cun/ereiices, pp. 316, 352.] "A person," says Bishop Wilson, Sacra Privala, p. 358, "whose heart is devoted to God, will never be surprised by death." sedition] In 1544, from Primer of 1535. Hermann, "a seditione et simultate. " priey conspiracy] In 1544. After this, in 1549 and 1552, came, "from the tyranny of the Bishop of Rome, and all his detestable enormities," which was omitted under Elizabeth ; and Cosin, in his First Series of Notes, says tliat the Puritans (of James I. 's time) wished to have it restored. It had been in the Primer of 1545, with "abominable" for "detestable." rebellion] Added, for obvious reasons, in 1661, by Cosin. His proposed version of the whole clause was, " From all open rebellion and sedition ; from all conspiracy and treason ; from all false doctrine, heresy, and schism ; f.-^om ..." false doctrine, heresy] In 1544. Hermann, "ab onmi errore. " schism] In 1661. The Primer of 1535 had had " schismies." hardness of heart, and contempt] In 1544. [Com;), the Third Collect for Good Friday. See Prov. i. 25.] The force of tliis Deprecation is best seen by remembering that a final hai-deuing of tlie heart is a penal infliction, provoked by habitual indiiference to Divine love. We may well entreat our Lord to save us from repaying His love by coldness, lest the capacity of loving Him be justly taken away. We may well implore Him, also, to keep us from the terrible possibility of ignoring, and practically despising. His revelation and His commands. Compare the beautiful Parisian Litany of tlie Holy Name of Jesus, "from neglect of Thy inspirations, Jesus, deliver us." THE OBSECRATIONS. By the mystery] Here begin the Obsecrations, as they are called. They go on the principle that every several act of our Lord's Mediatorial life has its appropriate saving energy ; that virtue goes out of each, because each is the act of a Divine Person, and has a Divine preciousness. When, there- fore, we say, " Deliver us by Thy Nativity, by Thy Tempta- tion," etc., we do not merely ask Him to remember those events of His human life, but we plead them before Him as mystically efl'ective, as instinct with life-giving grace, as parts of a Mediatorial whole. Doubtless, the Death of our Lord is the meritorious cause of our salvation ; we are redeemed by it, not by His Circumcision, or His Fasting ; and to efface the distinction between it and all other parts of the "Q5conomy," in regard to His office as the Lamb of God, would be an indication of theological unsoundness. At the same time it is also true that, in St. Leo's language, all our Lord's acts, as being related to His atoning Passion, are " sacramental " as well as "exemplary;" His Nativity is our spiritual birth. His liesurrection our revival. His Ascension our advancement. They are not only incentives and patterns, but efficient causes in the order of grace. So St. Bernard, in his second Pente- cost Sermon, says that His Conception is to cleanse ours, His Resurrection to prepare ours, etc. More vividly, St. Anselm, in his fifteenth Prayer, " O most sweet Lord Jesus, by Thy holy Annunciation, Incarnation . . . Infancy, Youth, Baptism, Fasting . . . scourges, buffets, thorny crown," etc. But tlie deepest and tenderest expression of this principle (surpassing even Bishop Andrewes' Obsecrations, "by Gethsemane, Gabba- tha, Golgotha,'' etc.) is in the mediajval Golden Litany, printed by Maskell, Momuncnta Rituulia, iii. 267, 272, "By Tliy great meekness, that Thou wouldst be comforted by an angel, so comfort me in every time. . . . For that piteous cry, in the which Thou commendedst Thy soul to Thy Fatlier, our souls be commended to Thee," etc. The coarse and heartless fanaticism wliich could cavil at these Obsecrations as "a certain conjuring of God," was characteristic of John Knox and his friends. They so expressed themselves when criticiz- ing the Litany ("certain suffrages devised of Pope Gregory ") in a letter to Calvin against tlie Prayer Book of 1552. Tliis cavil is alluded to by Bishop Pearson, {ilinor ]Yorks, ii. 99. J Bishop Duppa writes, "No oath, nor no exorcism." of Tliy holy Incarnation] So Sarum, York, Hereford, Roman, Cistercian, Dominican. "The mystery " is doubtless an allusion to 1 Tim. iii. 16. The thought which it suggests is that which of old made men bow down in adoration at the words in the Creed, "et Homo factus est." "By all the stupendous truths involved in Thine assumption of our humanity, wherein Thou, being true God, becamest true Man, combining two Natures in Thy single Divine Person, without confusion, and without severance ; so that, in the Virgin's womb. Thou didst bring God and man together, undergoing all the conditions of infant life, Thyself unchangeably the Creator and Life-giver." The Roman adds, "By Thine Advent." Utrecht has " By Thine Annunciation, by Thine Ath'ent and Nativity." Thy hoi II Nativity] After Hereford. So the Sarum Primer. [Maskell, iii. 106.] The Latin Book of 1560 made "Nativity, Circumcision," etc., dependent on "mysterium. " York has no mention of the Nativity. Circumcision] This is not in the present Roman, but in two old Roman forms in Menard's notes to the Gregorian Sacramen- tary [741 and 923]. The Parisian of the Holy Name places after "Nativity," "Thine infancy. Thy most Divine life. Thy labours." Sarum Litany for the Dying adds " apparitionem tuam ; " and Utrecht has "circumcisionem et oblationen> tuam. " Baptism, Fastin;/] Roman combines "Baptism and holy Fasting." Utrecht, "Baptism and Fasting." Maskell's Sarum Primer, " Thy Fasting and much other penance doing." Temptation] 1544. Primer of 1535, and Hermann, "tempta- tions." Golden Litany, in Maskell, "The tempting of the fiend in the desert." Aijony and Bloody S%veat] 1544. So Hermann. Golden Litany, "For that agony in which Thou offeredst Thee wil- fully to death, obeying Thy Almighty Father; and Thy bloody sweat." Primer of 1535, "Thy painful agony, in sweating blood and water. " Cross and Passion] So Roman, York for Easter Eve, and Anglo-Saxon (probably an old York form), in Procter, p. 255, and Hermann. Mabillon's Anglican, or Armorican, Hereford, Utrecht, Carthusian, Cistercian, Dominican, have "Passion and Cross ;" so Sarum for the Dying. This is the more natural order. Sarum Primer, "Thy holy Passion." The Tours omits "Thy Cross," which forms the only Obsecra- tion in the Corbey MS. Litany [Menard, note 380], and in the Litany of the ninth century, in Muratori, i. 76. The Golden Litany dwells with intense tenderness on all the details of the Crucifixion, and on some points which are traditional or legendary. Parisian of the Holy Name, "Tliine Agony and Passion, Thy Cross and forsaking, — lanijuores tiios." jirecious Death] Sarum. So in Sarum Litany for the Dying, 228 Cbc ititani?. Burial ; by Thy glorious Resurrection and Asce7i- sion ; and by the coming of the Holy Ghost, Good LoiiiK deliver us. In all time of our tribulation ; in all time of our wealth ; in the hour of death, and in the day of judgement, Good Lord, deliver us. We sinners do beseech Thee to hear us, O Lord God ; and that it may please Thee to rule and govern Thy holy Church universal in the right way ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. ' [»ar. Celebr- Ord.) Per gloriosam Resurrectionem Tuam : Libera Per (admirabilem) Ascensionem Tuam : Libera Per adventum Sancti Spieitus (Paracliti) : Libera . . . Li hora mortis : (Succurre nobis), Domine. In die judicii : Libera nos, Domine. "Peccatores : Te rogamiis, audi nos. Ut [*sanctam] Ecclesiam Tuam ['Catholicam] regere (et defensare) digneris : Te rogamus, audi Anglo-Saxon, York, Stras- ordinary Parisian, ' ' holy "piissiraam mortem tuam." Sarura Primer, "most piteous death." Ordo Romanus mentions the Cross, Passion, Death. Burial] Not in Sarum ; but in Sarum Primer, " Thy blessed burying." "Thy De.ath and Burial" in Roman, Utrcclit, Strasburg, for Easter Eve, Primer of 1535, Hermann, Parisian. Thy glorious liesurrection] So Sarum, Hereford, Narbonne, Moisac, Cistercian, Carthusian, Dominican, Sarum and Parisian Litanies for the Dying, burg, Utrecht, Roman, and Resurrection." Ascension] Anglo-Saxon, Sarum, York, Hereford, Roman, Moisac, Narbonne, Cistercian, Carthusian, Dominican, Parisian, prefix "admirabilem" to "Ascensionem;" Stras- burg and Utrecht liave " glorious." Remiremont, "radiant." Golden Litau}', "wonderful and glorious." Parisian of the Holy Name has after "Ascension," "by Thy joys, by Thy glory. " the coming of tlic Holy Ghost] Sarum, for the Dying, "The coming of tlie Holy Ghost, the Paraclete : " so Ordo Romanus, present Roman, and Hermann. "The Paraclete " was omitted in 1544, as in Primer of 1535. Sarum, York, Hereford, Anglo-Saxon, Sarum Primer, Cistercian, Dominican, and Benedictine of M. Cassino, have "grace" instead of "coming." Armorican, "by the descent of the Holy Ghost." Tours and Utrecht simply, " by the .Spirit, the Paraclete." Utrecht and others add an Obsecration by the Second Advent, e.g. "by Thy future Advent," " by the majesty of Thine Advent." In all time of our tribulation . . . wealth] 1544. After Primer of 1535, "in time of our tribulations, in the time of our felicity ; " Hermann, "in all time," etc. The Scottish and American Books have "prosperity" for "wealth." Tlie suffrage seems to refer not only to deliverance out of afflictions, but to deliverance from the special moral dangers which attend them. [Exod. vi. 9 ; Jer. v. 3 ; Hos. vii. 14 ; Amos iv. 6. See too the remarkable case of Ahaz, '2 Chron. xxviii. '22, and the awful picture in Rev. xvi. 11.] SuiJ'ering often liardens instead of softening the heart ; and therefore " not witliout reason has the Church taught all her faithful children to say, ' Suffer us not . . . for any pains of death to fall from Thee!'" [Mill, Univ. Sermons, p. 332.] The trials of pro- sperity [Deut. viii. 14 ; Jer. v. 24 ; and Uzziah's case, 2 Chron. xxvi. 16, etc.] are more commonly recognized. Even the Greeks knew, as an etliic.al commonplace, that it was hard to bear success without insolence and moral depravation. [Arist. Eth. iv. 8.] It is tlie Christian's wisdom and happiness to learn the secret of strength against both these forms of trial, .13 St. Paul learned it. [Phil. iv. 12 ] in the hoar of ileath] So Sarum and Hereford, adding, as the response, "Succour us, Lord." This suffrage, for which York substitutes " from the pains of hell," comes before the Obsecrations in Benedictine of M. Cassino. in the day nf judgement] Sarum, York, Hereford, Roman, Ordo Romanus, Utrecht, Dominican, etc. The vernacular Litanies in Maskell liave "in tlie day of doom." Golden Litany, " Succour us, most sweet .Tesn, in that fearful day of the strict judgement." [Cornj^. tlie Dies Ira;.] The following is a tabular view of the Deprecations and Obsecrations of the .Sarum and Roman Litanies : — Sarum. From perpetual damnation (H.). From perils imminent for our sins. From assaults of demons. From the spirit of fornication. From the desire of vain-glory. From rdl uncleanness of mind and body (Y. H. ). From anger and hatred, and r.ll ill-will (Y.). From unclean thoughts. From blindness of heart. From lightning and tempest. From sudden and unforeseen death (Y, sudden). By the mystery of Thy holy Incarnation (Y. H.). By Thy Nativity (H. holy). By Tliy holy Circumcision. By Thy Baptism. By Thy Fasting. By Tliy Cross and Passion (H. Passion and Cross). By Thy precious Death. B}' Thy glorious Resurrection (H. Y. holy). By Thy wonderful Ascension (Y. H.). By the grace of the Holy Ghost the Paraclete (Y. H.). In the hour of death, succour us, O Lord (H. ). In the day of judgement, de- liver us, Lord (Y. H. ). lloTiian. From Thy wrath. From sudden and unforeseen death. From the snares of the devil. From the scourge of earth- quake. From anger and hatred, and all ill-will. From the spirit of fornication. From lightning and tempest. From everlasting death. From pestilence, famine, and war. By the mystery of Thy holy Incarnation. By Thine Advent. By Thy Nativity. By Thy Baptism and holy Fasting . By Thy Cross and Passion. By Thy Death and Burial. By Thy holy Resurrection. By Thy wonderful Ascension. By the coming of the Holy Ghost the Paraclete. In the day of judgement. I Sarum. From all evil (also in York and Hereford). P'rom the snares of the devil (Y. H.). Itoman. From all evil. From .all sin. THE SUPPLICATIONS. Il'e sinners] Here begin the Petitions, or Supplications ; introduced by a confession of our oinfulness. So in Sarum, York, Hereford, Roman, Cistercian, Cartluisian, Dominican, etc., "We sinners beseech Tliec to hear us." In some the suffrage is, "We sinners," and the response, "Beseech Thee, hear us." But the Dominican makes the reader s.ay the whole, and the choir repeat the whole. As we have seen, tlie Sarum use was for the clioir to repeat all after tlie reader, until after this petition. The Litany of 1544, which joined this with the suffrage for tlie Church, added the word "God." And this may be s^-t .igainst tlie substitution of "Lord," for thcoriginal "ourGod," in "0 Saviour of the world." After- wards, in Sarum, Hereford, Dominican, come two suffrages, which reniind us of the older "Pacifiea>," "That Thou wouldst give us peace . . . That Thy mercy and pity may ])reserve us." York places the first of these here, the .second further on. The Roman has three suffrages, "That Thou spare us . . . That Thou forgive us . . . That it may please Thcc to bring us to true repentance." Utrecht has two, for peace and pardon ; Cistercian, for peace, only. Thy Italy Church unircrsal] The Preces of Fiilda pray for "deepest peace and tranquillity," and then for "the Holy Ct)c iLitanj). 229 That it may please Thee to keep "and strengthen in the true worshipping of Thee, in righteous- ness and holiness of life, Thy Servant VIC- TORIA, our most gracious Queen and Governor; We beseech Thee to hear ns, good Lord. That it may please Thee to rule her heart in Thy faith, fear, and love, and that she may ever- more have affiance in Thee, and ever seek Thy honour and glory ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to be her defender and keeper, giving her the victory over all her enemies ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to bless and pre- serve Albert Ediuard Prince of Wales, the Prin- cess of Wales, and all the 'Royal Family ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to illuminate all Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, with true know- ledge and understanding of Thy Word ; and that both by their preaching and living they may set it forth, and shew it accordingly ; We beseech Thee to hear 11$, good Lord. That it may please Thee to endue the Lords of the Council, and all the Nobility, with grace, wisdom, and understanding ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. a ati.i strtiifthtn ■ ■ ■ '•/C[ISS')\- * Sav. c See note below. e [Liber Festivalis. Bidding of Bedes.] *Ut Regi nostro et principibus nostris paceni et veram concordiam atquc victoriam douare digneris ; Te rogamus. audi nos. Ut Episcopos — nostros ["'et Praelatos nostros], in sancta religione [''in Tuo sancto servitio], con- servare digneris : Te rogamus, audi nos. [ '. . . and for all the Lords of the Councel, and all other of the Nobilitie which dwell in the countrayes having protection and government of the same, that Almightie God may send grace so to governe and ride the land . . .] Catholic Church, which is from cue end of the earth to the other." Sariim simply, "Thy Church." So Hereford, Cis- tercian, Dominican. Procter's, York, and Roman, "Thy holy Church." Saruni at Ordination, "Thy Catholic Church." Sarum reads, "to govern and defend;" so Cistercian. Roman, "to govern and preserve." The Ordo Romanus, "to exalt Thy Church." The Primer of 1535, "to govern and lead Thy holy Catholic Church." The Book of 15.59 has "universally." The Latin Book of ]. 560, "Catholicam." The Scottish Book, "Thy holy Catholic Church universally." ill the rirjht way] This expresses generally what in the Sarum had a special reference to the ecclesiastical state and religious orders, — " in holy religion . . . That it may please Thee to preserve the congregations of all holy persons in Thy service," or, as Hereford, in "Thy holy service." That it may please Thee to keep] To pray for the Sovereign before the Bishops was not absolutely a novelty at the time when our Litany was drawn up. Tlie Sarum, indeed, before the separation from Rome, liad prayed first for " Domnum Apostolicum " (the Pope), "and all degrees of the Church," then for "our Bishops and Abbats, " then for "our King and Princes." York and Hereford had a like order (Hermann's Litany places " Sovereign " after "Clergy," and indeed after other classes). But the three vernacular Litanies printed by Maskell all place "our Kings . . . and Princes" before "Prelates" or "Bishops," although one of them prays first for the Pope and for ' ' each degi-ee of holy Church." [Maskell, iii. 107.] The words "and strengthen ... of life " were first added in the Litany of 1558. Prayers for the spiritual good of the Sovereign had not been usual in old Litanies ; that of 15-44 prayed that Queen Catherine might be kept in the Lord's fear and love, with increase of godliness, etc. The present Roman prays generally that Christian kings and princes niay have peace and true concord. The Ambrosian Preces for First Sunday in Lent have, "for Thy servants, the Emperor N., and the King N. , our Duke, and all their army." Fulda, "for the most pious Emperor, and the whole Roman army." may evermore have affiance] In 1549 and 1552 the reading was "always." AffianC'',, in the sense of trust, is found in Shakespeare. [Henry V. ii. 2 ; 2nd Part of Henry VS. iii. 1.] It is also used in a letter addressed to Suffolk by Wolsey, who writes, "Having also such an assured affiance in your truth that . , . ye would not have broken your promise. " [Henry VIII. State Papers, Dam. and For. 224.] girinrj her the victory] So Sarum, York, Hereford. [See above.] The thought probably came from Ps. cxliv. 10. The Lyons has " to preserve our King . . . That Thou grant him life and victory. " Hermann has a suffrage, "to give to our lOmperor perpetual victory against the enemies of God " (i.e. the Turks) : Luther's, "his enemies." Royal Family] In our Medieval Litanies "our Princes" are mentioned. In 1544, beside the suffrage for Queen Catherine, there is one for "our noble Prince Edward, and all the King's M.ijesty's children." The Primer of 1535 prayed for Queen Anne and the King's posterity. Under Edward and Eliza- beth there was no suffrage of this kind. James I. inserted the present suffrage in this form, "... and preserve our gracious Queen Anne, Prince Henry, and the rest of the King and Queen's royal issue. " Bishops, Priests, and Deacons] Sanim (after a suffrage for the Pope, see above) prays for "our Bishops and Abbats." York, "our Archbishop, and every congregation committed to him " (as in the Y'ork form of our Collect for Clergy and People). See Hereford above, where "Prelates" would include Abbats and Priors, Deans and Archdeacons. Utrecht, "to preserve our Prelate in Thy holy service." Compare the Lyons, "to preserve our Pontilf . . , That Thou wouldest grant him life and health ; " and it proceeds to pray for the Clergy and People. So the Ambrosian Preces, "for all their Clergy . . . and all Priests and Ministers ; " and Fulda, "our father the Bishop, all Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, and the whole Clergy." The whole body of the Clergy were not definitely prayed for in our Church Litanies until 1.544, when tlie form ran, " Bishops, Pastors, and Minis- ters of Thy Church " (after the pattern of the Primer of 1535), and so continued until the last review, when the pre- sent form was adopted by way of more expressly negativing the ministerial claims of persons not in Holy Orders. Her- mann's has " pastors and ministers," and also, like the Primer of 1535, prays for the sending of "faithful labourers into the harvest." Lords 0/ the Council . . . Nohility . . . Mlagistrates] 1544. The Primer of 1535 has, "That our ministers and governors may virtuously rule Thy people ; " and Hermann's praj-s for " principem nostrum cum prcesidibus suis," and for " magis- tratus. " Palmer compares an ancient Soissons formula, " Life and victory to the Jiidr/es, and the whole army of the Franks." The Preces of Fulda apparently refer to Magis- trates in the words, " For all who are set in high place." Our present form certainly points to the Tudor government 1)1/ the Sovereign in his Privv Council. "Truth" means the Faith held bv the Ciiurch. 230 ^bt litanp. That it may please Tliee to bless and keep the Magistrates, giving them grace to execute justice, and to maintai)! truth ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to bless and keep all Thy people ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Loud. That it may please Thee to give to all nations unity, peace, and concord ; We beseech Tliee to hear its, good Lueii. That it may please Thee to give us an heart to love and dread Thee, and diligently to live after Thy commandments ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to give to all Thy people increase of grace, to hear meekly Thy Word, and to receive it with pure affection, and to bring forth the fruits of the Spirit ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to bring into the way of truth all such as have erred, and are deceived ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to strengthen such as do stand ; and to comfort and help the weak-hearted ; and to raise up them that fall ; and finally to beat down Satan under our feet ; We beseech Thee to hear its, good Lord. Vt cunctum populum Christianuni (pretioso sanguine Tuo redemptum) conservare digneris : Te rogamus . . . ["Ut pacem et concordiani nobis dones.] the Marjistrales] Cosin wished to substitute for "the Magistrates " "all the subordinate Magistrates." till Thy people] Compare Saruni, York, Hereford. So a Litany of the ninth century in Muratori, i. 77, Carthusian, and Dominican, Tours is nearer to our form, "to preserve the whole Christian people." The Corbey MS. , " to remove Thy wrath from the whole Christian people." to gii-e to all nations nnilij, peace, and concord] This comes partly from the old suffrage, " peace and true concord to our King and Princes," and partly from the York. [See above.] Mabillon's Anglican or Armorican prays for peace and unity to be given to the whole Christian people ; as does the Roman. In our present suffrage "unity" may be understood in a religious or spiritual sense, while "peace" would mean freedom from external foes, and "concord" freedom from internal dissension. to give us an heart to love] 1544. Similar prayers e.xist iu ancient Litanies ; thus, the Corbey MS. , ' ' right faitli, and a sure hope in Thy goodness, Lord Jesus." The Fleury, "to give us holy love . . . right faith . . . firm hope." So the Chigi MS., in three suH'ragea for faith, hope, and love. Parisian, for the same, in one sulTrage. Compare also the Sarum, "That Thou wouldest make the obedience of our service reasonable . . . That Thou wouldest lift up our minds to heavenly desires." So the Dominican. TheSarnm Primer, "ord.ain in Thy holy will our days .and works." lioman has also, "to strengthen and keep us in Thy holy service." The Anglican or Armorican, "Grant us perseverance in good works . . . keep us in true faith and religion." " Dread," in the sense of holy and reverent fear ; which can never be dis- pensed with by faithful worshippers of the God-Man, Who will come to be their Judge. Here again is a thought much needeil iu times when there is a tendency to dwell on our Lord's human character without due regard to the Divinity of His Person. to r/ive to all Thy people increase of grace] A beautiful com- bination of the passage about the good ground in the par.able of the Sower, with James i. 21 and Gal. v. 22. Its date is L544 ; but the Sarum Primer has something like it, " Vouch- safe to inform ua with right-ruled under.standings," from " Ut rogularibus dieciplinis nns inatrucre digneris." [MS. Lit. of fifteenth century, Univ. Coll.j The same form is in Cister- cian and Dominican, and h.as a monastic import. And the Primer of 15,3.5 has the first form of it, "to give the hearers of Thy Word lively grace to understand it, and to work there- after, by the virtue of the Holy Ghost." So Hermann, "to give the hearers increase of Thy Word, and the fruit of the Spirit." Litanies for the Sick have similar topics, " to pour into his heart the grace of the Holy Spirit ... to bestow on him grace ;" and the Ordo Romanus, Utrecht, Carthusian, and Eucharistic Litany in Chigi's MS., have "to pour into our hearts," etc. An exquisite Litany in the Breviary of the Congregation of St. Maur prays, "That Thou wouldest write Thy law in our hearts . . . wouldest give Thy servants a teachable heart . . . That we may do Thy will with all our heart and mind . . . That we may gladly take on us Thy sweet yoke," etc. (0 bring into the ^my of truth] In 1544. After 15.'55, "That all which do err and be deceived may be reduced into the way of verity." Hermann, "err.antes et seductos reducere in viam veritatis. " The Church has always prayed for this. So St. Clement of Rome, " Convert those of Thy people who are gone astray." [Ep. Cor. c. 59.] "It becomes us to pray for all who are gone astray." [St. ATHAN.-isir.s, rfe Sent. Dion. 27.] St. Chrysostom's Liturgy prays for those who are wan- dering in error. "Thou hearest God's Priest at the altar, exhorting God's people to pray for the unbelievers, that God would convert them to the faith. " [St. Aug. Ep. 217.] Compare the old Gelasian intercession on Good Friday, for all heretics and all in error ; the Mozarabio I'rcces for the same day, " May forgiveness set riglit those who err from the faith;" and, still more like our suttrage, the Lyons form, "That Thou wouldest bring back the erring into the way of salvation." to strengthen such as do stand] 1544. Hermann, "stantes confortare." the n-eak-hearled] 1544. Primer of 15,35 prays for those who are "weak in virtue, and soon overcome in tempta- tion." Hermann, " pusillanimes et tent.atos consolari et adjuvare." So St. Clement of Rome, " Comfort the faint- hearted." that fall] 1544. Compare the old G«lasian prayer at Absolution of Penitents, "succurre lapsis." Hermann, " l.apsos erigere." St. Clement of Rome, "Raise up the fallen." heat down Satan] 1544. From Rom. xvi. 20 ; a text quoted in the Intercessory Prayer of St. Mark's Litnrg}-. Compare the Greek OlHce for making a Catechumen. I'mucr of 151)5, " That we may the devil, with all his pomps, crush and tread under foot." Hermann, " Ut Satanam eul) pedibua nostris conterere digneris." Strasburg, "That Thou wouldest grant us heavenly armour .against the devil." €\)t Litani). 2X1 That it may please Thee to succour, help, and comfort, all that are in danger, necessity, and tribulation ; We beseech Thee to hear ns, yuod Loud. That it may please Thee to preserve all that travel by land or by ■water, all women labouring of child, all sick persons, and young children ; and to shew Thy pity upon all prisoners and captives; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to defend, and provide for, the fatherless children, and widows, and all that are desolate and oppressed ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lonn. That it may please Thee to have mercy upon all men ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to forgive our ene- mies, persecutors, and slanderers, and to turn their hearts ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. That it may please Thee to give and preserve to our use the kindly fruits of the earth, so as in due time we may enjoy them ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. i' [Borli. niiiciii.g f)f Itedes. A.u. 1403.J •^ Igorli.l " Ut mLserias pauperum Te rogamus, audi nos. relevarc digneris ; [''... for all parishiors whereso they be on land or on water . . . and for all women that are with child in this parish . . . for all them that are sick . . .] [' Ut fratribus nostris et omnibus fidelibus infinnis sanitatem mentis et cori)oris donare dig- neris : Te rogamus, audi nos.] Ut miserias . . . captivorum intueri et rele- vare digneris : Te rogamus, audi nos. Ut fructus terras dare et conservare digneris : Te rogamus, audi nos. to succour, help, and comfort] 1544. Primer of 1535 prays for "all extreme poverty," "Thy people in affliction or in peril, and danger by fire, water, or land." Hermann, " afilictos et periclitantes. " Sarum and York have "to look upon and relieve the miseries of the poor." So Dominican. all that travel] 1544. Compare Hereford, "Tliat Thou wouldest dispose the journey of Thy servants iti salutis tnn- prosperitate" (as in the Collect, "Assist us mercifully," originally a prayer for one about to travel) ; and Dominican, "to bring to a harbour of safety all faithful persons, iiarii/autcn et ittneranles." all women labonriii;/ of child] So Primer of 1535, "that teeming women may have joyful speed iu their labour. " So Hermann, for " pregnant women. " all skk j^f^rsoiis, and younrj children] So Primer of 1535, for "sick people." So Hermauii, for "infants, and the sick." cdl prisoners and captiivs] So Hermann. Compare tlie Sarum and Primer for "thralls." This intercession of the English Lit.any had also probably a special reference to Christians in captivity among the Mahometans in Algiers, etc. Many legacies were left for the redemption of such captives, and briefs were sometimes issued for the same purpose. the fatherless children, and widotcK] One of the teuderest jjetitions in the Prayer Book, and full of touching significance, as offered to Him Who intrusted His Mother to His Apostle. It was placed here in 1544 (tlie words being clearly suggested by such passages as Ps. c.\lvi. 9; Jer. .\lix. 11), but, like other passages of that date, is true to the old spirit of Church prayer. St. Mark's Liturgy prays for the widow and tlio orphan. Hermann, ' ' Ut pupillos et viduas protegere et pro- videre digneris." all that are desolate and oppressed] In these words the Church seems to sweep the wliole field of the sorrow whicli comes from "man's inhumanity to man," and which no civilization can alxilish ; and invokes fur every such sufferer the lielp of Him Whose sympathy is for all at once, and for each as if tliere were none beside. This indeed is one of the most stupendous results of the Incarnation, although perhaps but seldom faced in thought : that our Lord's sacred Heart is, so to speak, really accessible at once to all who need its inex- liaustible compassion : He cares for each, not only as God, but as Man, with a special, personal, human tenderness, to wliich His Godlicad gives a marvellous capacity of extension. Compare also this and the preceding suffrages of our Litany, with intercessions in St. Clement of Rome's Epistle, "Shew Tliyself to those who are in need . . . feed tlio liungry . . . ransom those of us who are in bonds ; " in St. Chrysostom's Liturgy, "for the young, for those that travel by land or by water ;" in St. Basil's, "Sail Thou with the voyagers, travel with the travellers, stand forth for the widows, shield the orpliaus, deliver the captives, heal the sick, remember all wlio are in affliction or necessity . . .be all things to all men ;" with the Gelasian prayer on Good Friday, that God would "open prisons, loosen chains, grant a return to travellers, health to the sick, a safe harbour to those at sea ;" and witli tlie Ambrosian Preces for first Sunday in Lent, "for orphans, captives . . . voyagers, travellers, those placed in prisons, in mines " (at forced Labour there), " in exile. " mcrci/ npon all nun] Tliis also is of 1544 : the Primer of 1535 had expressed the same all-comprehending charity : " Tliat unto all people Tliou wilt shew Thy inestimable mercy." The Church has ever pr.iyed for all men. That her prayers do not avail for all, is not from any defect in her charity, or in the Divine benignity, but from tlie bar which a rebellious will can oppose to the powers of the kingdom of grace. Bishop Duppa's note is, "The objection against this is answered by what St. Paul saith, 1 Tim. ii. 4 : tlie prayer being made in the same sense as God is said to will that all men sliould be saved." [Com}). Hooker, v. 49.] foiyire our enemie.i] 1544; Primer of 1535, "forgive all warriors, persecutors, and oppressors of Thy people, and con- vert them to grace." Our present form (wliich is the same as Hermann's) is certainly preferable, and more like the Anglo- Saxon, "to bestow on our enemies peace and love." Com- pare St. Chrysostom's Liturgy: "For those Miio liate and persecute us for Thy Name's sake, tliat Tiiou wouldest convert tlieni to what is good, and ajipease tlieir Mratli against us." to (jive and preserve to our nse the kindl;/ fruits] " Kindly " means natural, produced after their kind. [See Archbishop Teexch, English I'ast and Present, p. 167.] So Wj-clifl'e and Purvey, Rom. xi. 21, " the kyiidli br.anches ; " and Much Ailo about Nothing, iv. 1, " that natural and kindly power," etc. This suffrage may represent to us the oldest AVestern use of Litanies, to avert excessive drouglits or rains, and to secure a good harvest. Tlie substance of it is in Sarum, York, aud Hereford, as in Anglo-Saxon, Lyons, Roman, Cistercian, Dominican. Y'^ork adds, " Ut aeris temperiem bonam nobis dones. " So Ordo Romanus and Utrecht. So Tours, "give us the fruit of the earth . . . serenity of sky . . . good temperature of we.ather. " So the Fleury: for "abundance of fruits, serenity of sky, seasonable rain." So in Ambrosi.au Preces: "Pro aeris temperie, ac fructu, et fecunditate terrarum, precamur te. " The Sarum Primer asks for "wholesome and reasonable air. " Compare the anthems 2^2 Clje iLitanj). That it ma}- please Tliee to give us true repent- ance ; to forgive us all our sins, negligences, and ignorances ; and to endue us ■with the grace of Thy Holy Spirit to amend our lives according to Thy holy "\Vord ; We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord. Son of God : ^-e beseech Thee to hear us. Sox of God : we beseech Thee to hear us. O Lamb of God : that takest away the sins of the world ; Grant us Thy peace. Lamb of Goo : that takest away the sius of the world ; Have mercy upon us. O Cheist, hear us. Christ, hear us. IT [111 elevatione cor- poris Christi. Horae B. \". M. A.D. 1530.] t> Cami. Ps. 25. 6. \'ulB. rf [Lyons.) /Wer.l sun" proce3sioiially iu Sarum for rain or fair weather. "0 Lord, King, God of Abraham, give us rain over the face of the earth, that this people may learn that Thou art the Lord our God, Alleluia." Jer. xiv. 22 is then quoted. Then, " The waters are come in like a flood, God, over our heads :" then Ps. Ixix. 1. Iu the Prayer Book as used iu the Isle of Man there is added "and to restore and continue to us the blessings of the seas," a petition which has reference to the herring fisliery. These words were inserted in 1705 by Bishop Wilson with the approval of the insular government ; and lie was enabled to do so witliout contravening the Act of Uniformity, as that Act does not extend to the Isle of Man. so as in due time] Was added 1544. The whole suf- frage was never more valuable than at a time like the present, when there is a tendency to substitute " laws of nature " for a Living God, and to ignore the fact that behind, above, beneath, around all "laws " is the absolute sovereign Person- ality of Him Who "is ever present with His works, one by one, and confronts everything which He has made by His particular and most loving Providence," at once the Lord of life and death, of health and sickness, of rain and drought, of plenty and famine. If men will not pray for seasonable weather, they cannot logically pray for recovery from sick- ness, for escape from sliipwreck, or any temporal good whatever. Such prayer leaves it to God to employ what means He will. to give us true repentance; to fort/ ire ns] This suffrage, as it stands, was framed in 1544. Sarum, York, and Hereford have not this petition for repentance, but Roman has it, with prayers for pardon, before the suffrage for tha Church. [See above.] York has, "That it may please Thee to give us remission of all our sins : " so the Ordo Romanus, which also asks for "spatium pitnitentise ; " and Sarum has "to bring again upon us the eyes of Thy mercy." Carthusian, "spatium pienitenti* et emeudationem vita- : " so the Chigi M.S., "That Thou wouldest grant us a place of repentance ; " and Utrecht asks for " compunction of heart and a fountain of tears ;" so Tours; so Fleury, "to give us forgiveness of all our sins, Lord Jesus, we beseech Thee . . . That Thou wouldest grant us veram pcenitentiam ar/ere." Tlie ordinary Parisian has suffrages for true repentance, for remission of all sins, for compunction of heart and a fountain of tears. Litanies for the Sick have several suffrages of this kind. Eatold's MS. [in Menanl, note 92.3], "That Thou wouldest grant him com- punction of lieart ... a fountain of tears . . . space of repent- .ince, if possible." Moisac, "to bestow on him fruitful and saving repentance ... a contrite and humbled heart ... a fountain of tears." Salzburg, "compunction of heart. . . a fountain of tears." Narbonne, "That Tliou wouldest give him remission of all sins." Remiremont, " pardon, remission, forgiveness of all liis sins," etc. So in the .Sarum Litany of Commendation of the Soul, and the Jumii'ges Litany : "Cuncta ejus peccata oblivioni perpetu;e traderc . . . remember not the sins and iijnoranci'S of liia youth." This, from the Vulgate of our Ps. XXV. 7, has supplied our present "sins . . . and ignorances." "Negligentiam" occurs in the Vulgate of Numb. V. 6. "Xegligenccs" mean careless omissions (compare Ham- mond's prayer, " Lord, forgive my sins, especially my sins of omi.ssion "). "Ignorances, ' faults done in ignorance of our duty, eucli ignorance being itself a fault, because tlie result of carelessness. [" Sanguis Tuus, Domine Jesu Chkisti, pro nobis effusus, sit luihi in remissionem omnium peccatorum, negligentiarum, et ignorantiarum mearum.*] ' FiLi Dei : Te rogamus, audi nos. Agnus Dei, Qui tollis peccata mundi : [' dona nobis pacem.] ' Agnus Dei, Qui tollis peccata mundi : miserere nobis. [^Christe, audi nos.] Among the medieval suffrages omitted in our present Litany are, "That Thou wouldest repay everlasting good to our benefactors . . . that Thou wouldest give eternal rest to all the faithful departed . . . that it may please Thee to visit and comfort this place ; " and last of all the petitions came, "That it may please Thee to hear us ; " as now in the Roman. This was omitted in 1544 as superfluous. Son of God} The Sarum rule, in the procession after the Mass "for brethren and sisters," was that the choir sliould repeat in full "Son of God," etc., with the Agnus and the Kyrie. Tallis' Litany shews that this practice was continued by our Choirs. Lamb of God] The custom of saying Agnus Dei here is referred to in the Gelasian Rubric for Easter Eve. In Sarum, York, Hereford, as now in Roman and Parisian, Carthusian, Dominican, the Agnus is thrice said. Tlie Sanim responses are, " Hear us, O Lord, Spare us, O Lord, Have mercy upon us : " the first a"nd second of these are transposed in Roman and Parisian, as in York, Hereford, Dominican. The responses in Tours were, " Spare us. Give us pardon, Hear us." The Ordo Romanus has a twofold Agnus. Lyons a fourfold, with "Spare us. Deliver us, Grant us peace. Have mercy upon us : " so that our present form is just the second half of Lyons. The Agnus conies but once in the Cistercian. " Grant us peace " is the third response in Utrecht, Carthusian, Hermann. The Sarum Litany for the Dying had also, "Grant him peace:" the ordinary Sarum Litany had a special suffrage for peace, and "Grant us peace " was familiar as the response to the third Agnus said at Mass, immediately after the breaking of the Blessed Sacrament ; the Primer of 1535 has "Have mercy, Have mercy, Give us peace and rest." tliat takest away the sins] The great value of this sup- plication consists in its recognition of our Blessed Lord as the Victim that was once indeed slain, but is of perpetual efficacy. He took away our sins, in one sense, by His aton- ing Passion : and the Atonement can never be repeated. In another sense. He continually lakes away our sins, by appearing for us as " the Lamb that was slain," presenting Himself as such to the Father, and pleading the virtue of His death. In this sense, as Bishop Phillpotts says [Pastoral of 1851, p. 54], " though once for all ofl'ered, that Sacrifice is ever living and continuous . . . ToHini His Churcli . . . continufiUy cries, ' Lamb of God' . . . not, ' that tookest away,' but still 'takest.^" With regard to the petition to the Prince of Peace, Who "is our Peace," for peace, compare the second Collect at Evensong. It is Christ's peace, not the world's : and this is brought out by the addition of " 7'/i;/ " in our form. Very touching are the entreaties in the Litany of the Abbey of St. Denis for St. Mark's Day [Martenc, iv. 353], "0 Bestower of peace, vouchsafe us perpetual peace, Have mercy . . . O benignant Jesus, receive our souls in peace," etc. Christ, hear «.5] Hereford : so too in Sarum Primer and Roman. Tlie Supplication also occurs in Mabillon's Caroline Litany; after " Agnus ... mundi, Christ, hear ns ; three Kyries ; Christ reigns, Christ commands, ( hrist conquers (thrice), Christ, hearns." It also occurs in liis Anj;lican, or Armorican. Lyons, Corbey, Tours, have it tluicc, Stras- burg once. The ordinary Ambrosian Litany has thrice, "0 Christ, hear our voices:" tlien thrice, "Hear, God, and have mercy upon us." Such "repetitions" are not "vain," unless those in Ps. cxxxvi. are so ; and compare St. Matt. xxvi. 44. Ct)e ititanp. 233 Lord, Lave mercy upon us. Lord, have mercy upon us. Christ, have mercy upon us. Christ, have mercy upon us. Lord, have mercy upon us. Lord, have mercy upion us. IT Then shall the Priest, and the People with him, say the Lord's Prayer. OUK Father, Which art in heaven. Hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth. As it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, As we forgive them that trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation ; But deliver us from evil. Amen. H * Priest. O Lord, deal not with us after our .sins. ■"Answer. Neither reward us after our iniquities. II Let us pray. OGOD, merciful Father, that despisest not the sighing of a contrite heart, nor the desire of such as be sorrowful ; MercifuHy assist our prayers that we make before Thee in all our troul)les and adversities, whensoever they oppress us ; and graciously hear us, that those evils which the craft and subtilty of the devil or man worketli against us, be brought to nought ; and by the providence of Thy goodness they may be dispersed ; that we Thy servants, being hurt by no persecutions, may evermore give thanks unto Thee in Thy holy Church ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Lord, arise, help us, and deliver us for Thy Name's sake. "Sar. I* The Vet-sicU [1549- 1662). I66aj. " Kyrie eleison. Christe eleison. Kyrie eleison. PATER nostcr, Qui es in coelis ; sanctificetur nomen Tuum : adveniat regnum Tuum : fiat voluntas Tua, sicut in ccelo, et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodic : et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimitti- mus debitoribus nostris : et ne nos inducas in tentationem : sed libera nos a malo. Amen. DoMiNE, non secundum peccata nostra facias nobi.s. Neque secundum iniquitates nostras retribuas nobis. DEUiS, Qui contritorum non despicis gemi- tum, et mcerentium non spernis affectum ; adesto precibus nostris, quas pietati Tuse pro tribulatioue nostra offerimus : implorantes ut nos clementer respicias, et solito pietatis Tuse intuitu tribuas, ut quicquid contra nos diabolicoe fraudes atque humanfe moliuntur adversitates ad nihi- lum redigas, et consilio misericordiaj Tuse allidas : quatenus nullis adversitatibus laesi, sed ab omni tribulatione et angustia liberati, gratias Tibi in ecclesia Tua referamus consolati. Per. Exurge, Domine, adjuva propter nomen Tuum. nos, et libera nos Lord, have merri/] Sarum, York, etc. This is the only occa- sion on which, with us, the people repeat every one of the three sentences of the Kyrie after the Minister. Such was the old Sarum rule as to this Kyrie. [See also p. 199.] THE SUFFRAGES. Our Father] Here begins the Second Part of the Litany. At some few Cathedrals two Lay Clerks sing the Litany at the faldstool to Tallis' music as far as this, that music extending no further, and the rest is said by one of the Priests. Lord, deal not with ws] In Sarum this verse and response, adapted from Ps. ciii. 10, were separated from the Lord's Prayer by " O Lord, shew Thy mercy — And grant — Let Thy mercy come also upon us, Lord, Even Thy salvation, accord- ing to Thy word : We have sinned with our fathers, We have done amiss and dealt wickedly. " In York only this last verse and response intervene. In Roman, "0 Lord, deal not," comes later. In the ordinary Parisian it comes, as with us, immediately after the Lord's Prayer. after onr sins] That is, " according to our sins." So Ham- let says, "Use every man after his desert, and who shall 'scape whipping ? " [Hamlet, ii. 2]. God, merciful Father] This is very slightly altered from the Collect in the Sarum Mass, "pro tribulatione cordis :" the Epistle being 2 Cor. i. .3-5 ; the Gospel, S. John xvi. 20-22. There is something pathetically significant in this adoption (1544) into the ordinary Litany of a prayer composed for "cloudy and dark days." It may remind us of the selection of part of this same passage from 2 Cor. i., as the capitulum of the ordinary Sunday Vespers in Roman, and Saturday Vespers in Sarum. The lesson is obvious — that God is always needed as a Comforter. It may bo added that a somewhat different version of this Sarum prayer occurs in the Missal published in 1552 by Flacius Illyricus, and supposed to repre- sent the use of Salzburg in the tenth or eleventh century. By comparing our English with the Sarum form, it will be seen that we have added "merciful Father," "Thy servants," " evermore," and made a general reference to "all " troubles, "whensoever they oppress us : " omitting a reference to God's "accustomed " loving-kindness, — the clause, "but delivered from all tribulation and distress," — and "being comforted" in the final clause. Hermann's and Luther's form is very like ours, but somewhat stronger, "in the afflictions which con- tinually oppress us." Lord, arise] This, the last verse of our Psalm xliv., slightly altered, occurs, after several Preces. in the York Litany. It also occurs in the Sarum and York rites for Rogation Monday. In Sarum the whole choir in their stalls repeated this "0 Lord, arise," with Alleluia. Then was said, ' ' God, we have heard with our ears, our fathers have told us," that being the whole of the first verse of the psalm according to the Vulgate : and then "immediately follows, Gloria." Then again, " Lord, arise : " after which the pro- cession set forth, the chanter commencing the Antiphon, "Arise, ye saints, from your abodes," etc. Another Anti- phon began, "We and all the people will walk in the Name of the Lord our God." In York the first "Exurge" was an anthem, "in eundo cantanda ; '' then came the first verse of the psalm, then a second "Exurge," after which the next words of the psalm were recited, "The work which Thou didst," etc., and so on through the whole psalm : "Exurge" being again said at the end. Among the processional Anti- phons was, "Kyrie eleison, Thou Who by Thy precious blood hast rescued the world from the jaws of the accursed serpent." It may be observed that in "Exurge" the "redime " of the Vulgate was altered into "libera : " and in 234 Cbe iLitanp. OGOD, we have heard with our ears, and our fathers have declared unto us, the uoble works that Thou didst in their days, and in the old time before them. Lord, arise, helj) ns, and deliver us for Thine Iwnour. Glory be to the Father, and to the Sox : and to the Holy Ghost ; Answer. As it wa^ in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. From our enemies defend us, Cheist. Graciously look upon our afflictions. Pitifully behold the ''sorrows of our hearts. Mercifully forr/ive lite sins of Thy i^eople. Favourably with mercy hear our prayers. Son of David, have mercy upon us. Both now and ever vouchsafe to hear us, O Christ. Graciously hear us, Christ ; (jraciously hear lis, Lord Christ. T "Triest. O Lord, let Thy mercy be shewed upon us ; ' Answer. As we do put our trust in Thee. IT Let us pray. TTTE humbly beseech Thee, O Father, mer- V V cifully to look upon our infirmities ; and o[gorl;.] * Sar. r (/y.Vr [1544I- rf T/tf Versicle [1545- I66=]. 1662]. DEUS, auribus nostris audivimus, patresque nostri annuntiaverunt nobis, [■'Opus quod operatus es in diebus eorum, et in diebus antiquis.] '^Exurge, DoMiNE, adjuva nos, et libera nos propter nomen Tuum. Gloria Patei, et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in ssecula sjeculorum. Amen. Ab inimicis nostris defende nos, Cheistk. Afflictionem nostram benignus vide. Dolorem cordis nostri respice clemens. Peccata populi Tui plus indulge. Orationes nostras pius exaudi. Fili (Dei vivi), miserere nobis. Hie et in perpetuum nos custodire digueris, Christe. Exaudi nos, Cheiste ; exaudi, exaudi nos, Cheiste. Fiat misericordia Tua, Domine, super nos. Quemadmodum speravimus in Te. INFIEMITATEM nostram.qusesumus, Domine, propitius respice, et mala omnia qufe juste the second repetitioa of "0 Lord, arise," we have altered "Name's sake " into " honour." God, v:e have heard] An appropriate representative of the Psalmody which followed tlie Litanies. [Jeee's Choral Service, p. 426. ] In the ordinary Saruin Litaii}', as used out of Rogation-tide, there is no psalm : our Litany, as we have seen, here represents the old Kogation use. It also resembles the present Roman Litany, inasmuch as the latter has a psalm (our 70th) with a Gloria, after tlie Lord's Prayer : after tlie psalm come certain Preces, partly intercessory, then ten Collects, and a Conclusion. The ordinary Parisian has Preces before the psalm, and twelve Collects after it. Tlie order in Sarum, York, Hereford, is. Lord's Prayer, Preces, and Collects : — seven in Sarum, ten in York (the York Use has various minute resemblances to the Pionian), and nine in Hereford. Among the York Collects are ours for the first and fourth .Sundays after Trinity, — the Collect for Clergy and People, — for Purity, — " God, Whose nature ; " "Assist us;" "0 God, from Whom." With respect to the forty- fourth Psalm, this fr.agment of it is specially apposite, as suggesting the true comfort amid despondency. [Ooinp. Ps. Ixxvii. 10; Isa. li. 9, etc. ] The history of God's p.ast mercies is a fountain of hope for those who own Him as the Rock of Ages, the " I AM" to all ages of His Church. O Lord, arisf] In this repetition we have a relic of the old use of Antiphons to intensify the leading idea of the psalm as used at the time, [flee Keai,e's Commentary mi the I'salnui, p. 40.] Clorij] This Gloria is an appendage to "0 God, we have heard." Coming as it does amid supplications for help, it witnesses to the duty and the happiness of glorifying (!od at all times and umler all circumstances, [t'omp. tlie end of Ps. Ixxxix. ] " Deo gr.atias " w.is iu the fourth century a perpetual watchword; .and the " Yero dignum " testifies to the duty of "giving th.anks always." [Comp. Acts xvi. 25.] From our enemies] These Preces, to the end of "Graciously hear us," were sung in procession, according to the use of Sarum, on St. Mark's D.ay, "if it was necessary, in time of war." The choir repeated every verse. They were also in a Litany for the Dedication of a Church in the pontificals of St. Dunstan, and of Egbert of York [a.d. 732-766]. In the St. Denis Litauy [Martene, iv. 353] we have a touching series of entreaties to Christ, "0 good Jesu, protect us everywhere and always. Have mercy ... our Redeemer, let not Thy Redemption be lost in us. Have mercy . . . Lord God our King, pardon the guilt of us all. Have mercy," etc. O Son of David] This is substituted for the " Fili Dei vivi" of the Latin Litany, and it is not known why the variation was introduced. The form "Jesu, Fili David, miserere . . ." was, however, not an uucommon one in the popular devotions of medi.-eval times. In the Book of Records of University College, Oxford, there is an entry to the following effect; " A composition twixt K. Henry Yll. and y<^ College concerning Dame Anne late Countess of Warwick, 8 H. 7 . . . and that the said JIaster, or any otlier Fellows of the said place that so shall sing the said high Masse in his stede that daye, sh.all devoutly remcmbre in his M.asse these words in his second Memento : ' Jesu, Fili David, miserere anima; Famu- I.ne tu;E Aline nuper Countesse Warwick ..." and that every poure scholcr of the ten poure scholers founded by the cliarit- a1)le alms of the Founders of the said College shall say devoutly kneeling on their knees, betweene the Levation and the Reception of the most glorious and blessed Body of Criste, 'Jesu, Fili D.avid, miserere f.amuUc tua; ... '" Similar words are also found in a Composition of a Bene- factor to M,agdalen College, Oxford, in the time of Henry VIII., "Jesu Fili David, miserere famuli tui Roberti. " [Stat, JUa'/d. Coll. Oxford, ii. 121.] The words were in use even at a much earlier date ; — " Voce lamentnljili ct quivrula olnniavit, Creaturani respice Tuum, l-'ili David." These verses occurring in the Dialoi/ue between Body and Soul, a poem known in almost every European language, and translated into Latin by Walter Mapes about tlie end of the twelfth century. [J'oons of Ji/apv.f, Cnmd. Soo. ed. p. 105.] O Lord, lei Thy mercy] This verse and response, Ps. xxxiii. 21, are part of the Sarum Preces of Prime. In several editions of our Litany they were called the Versicle and the Aniuxr. Il'c humbly beseech Thee] This is an enlarged and improved ipragcrs anD Cbanksgitiings. 235 for the glory (if Thy "Name turn from us all those evil-s that we most righteously have deserved ; and grant, that in all our troubles we may put our whole trust and confidence in Thy mercy, and evermore serve Thee in holiness and pureness of living, to Thy honour and glory, through our only Mediator and Advocate, Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.'' IT A Prayer of St. Chrysostorn. ■ALMIGHTY God, Who hast given us grace at --LA- this time with one accord to make our common supplications unto Thee ; and dost pro- mise, that when two or three are gathered to- gether in Thy iS^'ame Thou wilt grant their requests ; Fulfil now, O Lord, the desires and petitions of Thy servants, as may be most ex- pedient for them ; granting us in this world knowledge of Thy truth, and in the world to come life everlasting. Amen. IT '2 Cor. xiii. THE grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost, be with us all evermore. Amen. i06.;J. b Tlic Prayer for the Sovcrciilii .Tlul tli.ll for the Clergy fol lowed here in 1559 ; and Ihe Prayers for the Koyal Family and for Einbcr Weeks were placed after that for the Sovereign in 1604. c This Benedictinn was inserted in meremur (omnium cessionibus) avertc. Sanctorum Per. Tuorum inter- Here endeth tlie Litany. PRAYERS. IT Prayers and Thanksgivings upon several occasions, to lie used before tli( and Evening Prayer. two final Prayers of tlie Litany, or of Morning "PRAYERS. O H For Rain. GOD, heavenly Father, Who by Thy Son Jesus Christ hast promised to all them a See notes below that seek Thy Kingdom, and the righteousness thereof, all things necessary to their bodily sus- tenance ; Send us, we beseech Thee, in this our form of the Sarum Collect in the Memorial of All Saints (among the Memorite Coinmunes at the end of Lauds, fcria 2). In 1544 it ran simply, "We humbly . . . and for the glory of Thy Name salce, turn from us all tliose evils that we most righteously have deserved. Grant this, O Lord God, for our Mediator and Advocate, Jesu Christ's sake ; " and was fol- lowed by four otlier Collects and the Prayer of St. Chrysostom. In 1549 it took its present form, save tliat ' ' Name sake " was still read, and that "holiness " was not prefixed to " pureness " until 1552. A Prayer of St. Chrysostom] This was added to the end of the Litany on its first introduction in its present form, in 1544. The (/race of our Lord] Was placed at the end of the Litany, after tlie Prayer of St. Chrysostom, in the Queen's Chai^el Litany of 155S. [i'ee note to it, p. 205.] THE OCCASIONAL PRAYERS. This collection of prayers and thanksgivings for special occasions was appended to Morning and Evening Prayer in 1661, but some of the prayers liad been in use at an earlier date. Such a collection had occupied a place at the end of the ancient Service-books of the Church : and the use of prayers similar to these is very ancient. In a printed Missal of 1514 (wliich formerly belonged to Bishop Cosin, and is now in his Library at Durham) tliere are Missc-e and Memoriae Communes (among others) witli tlie followincr titles : — Memoriae Commxmes. Contra aereas tempestates. invasores ecclesis. adversantes. paganos. Miss(c. Missa pro serenitate ac;ris. • — pluvia. tempore belli. contra mortalitatem Ik niiuum. pro peste animalium. But such occasional prayers were not uniformly the same in the ancient Service-books ; varj'ing at different times according to the necessities of the period and of the locality. In the first edition of the English Prayer Book two occasional prayers, the one "for Rain," and the other "for fair Weather," were inserted among the Collects at the end of the Communion Service. These were the same as those now placed here. Four more were added in 1552, the two "in time of Dearth," and those " in time of War," and of " Plague or Sickness ; " and the whole six were then placed at the end of the Litany. Thanksgivings corresiJunding to these were added in 1604 : and the remainder, both of the pra3'ers and thanksgivings, were added in 1(;61, when all were placed where they now stand. These occasional Pr.ayers and Thanks- givings are almost entirelj' original compositions, tliough they were evidently composed by divines who were familiar with expressions used for the same objects in the old Services. With several a special interest is connectcil. but others may be passed over without further notice. What few clianges were made in this collection of occasional prayers are trace- able to Bishop Cosin, except the important insertion of the 236 iprapcrs anD CbanfeiSfgitimp. necessity, such moderate rain and sliowers, that we may receive the fruits of the earth to our com- fort, and to Thy honour ; through Jesus Chkist our Lord. Amen. Xl For fair Weather. O ALMIGHTY Lord God, Who for the sin of man didst once drown all the world, except eight persons, and afterward of Thy great mercy didst promise never to destroy it so again ; We humbly beseech Thee, that although we for our iniquities have worthily deserved a plague of rain and waters, yet upon our true repentance Thou wilt send us such weather, as that we may receive the fruits of the earth in due season ; and learn both by Thy punishment to amend our lives, and for Thy clemency to give Thee praise and glory ; through Jesus Chrlst our Lord. Ameyi. T lu tlie time of Dearth and Famine. OGOD, heavenly Father, Whose gift it is, that the rain doth fall, the earth is fruit- ful, bea.sts increase, and fishes do multiply; Behold, we beseech Thee, the afflictions of Thy people ; and grant that the scarcity and dearth (which we do now most justly suffer for our iniquity), may through Thy goodness be merci- fully turned into cheapness and plenty, for the love of Jesus Christ our Lord ; to Whom with Thee and the Holy Ghost be all honour and glory, now and for ever. Amen. II Or this. OGOD, merciful Father, Who, in the time of Elisha the prophet, didst suddenly in Samaria turn great scarcity and dearth into plenty and cheapness ; Have mercy upon us, that we, who are now for our sins punished with like adversity, may likewise find a seasonable relief : Increase the fruits of the eartli by Thy heavenly benediction ; and grant that we, receiving Thy bountiful liberality, may use the same to Thy glory, the relief of those that are needy, and our own comfort, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Ameti. IT In the time of War and Tumults. O ALMIGHTY God, King of all kings, and Governor of all things, Whose power no creature is able to resist, to Whom it belongeth justly to punish sinners, and to be merciful to them that truly repent ; Save and deliver us, we humbly beseech Thee, from the hands of our enemies ; abate their pride, assuage their malice, and confound their devices ; that we, being armed with Thy defence, may be preserved ever- more from all perils, to glorify Thee, Who art the only Giver of all victory; through the merits of Thy only Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. II In the time of any common Plague or Sickness. O ALMIGHTY God, Who in Thy wrath didst send a plague upon Thine own people in the wilderness for their obstinate rebellion against Moses and Aaron ; and also, in the time of king David, didst slay with the plague of pesti- lence threescore and ten thousand, and yet re- membering Thy mercy didst save the rest; Have pity upon us miserable sinners, who now are visited with great sickness and mortality ; that like as Thou didst then accept of an atonement, and didst command the destroying Angel to cease from punishing, so it may now please Thee to withdraw from us this plague and grievous sickness ; through Jesus Christ our Loed. Amen. II In the Ember Weeks to be said every day, for those that are to be admitted into Holy Orders. ALMIGHTY God, our heavenly Father, Who -lA. hast purchased to Thyself an universal Prayer for the Parliament, that for all Conditions of Men, and the General Thanksgiving. The Rubric standing at the head of the prayers is Cosin's ; but he would have explained "occasional" by adding "if the time require" at the end of it ; which words were not printed. His revised Prayer Book also contains a rubrical heading in the margin, "For the Par- liament and Convocation durinrj their sessions," but no prayer is annexed. [See further, notes on the Prayer for the Parlia- ment. ] § In the time of Dearth and Famine. The second of these prayers was — for what reason is not apparent— left out of the Prayer Book in several of the editions published during the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and James I. Bishop Cosin wrote it in the margin of his revised Prayer Book, and it was reinserted in IGG), with some slight alterations of his making. § In the time of any common Plague or Sickness. The Collect form which is so strictly preserved in these prayers was strengthened in this one by the addition of another Scriptural allusion in the Invocation. This— from "didst send a plague" as far ,%3 "and also" — was inserted by Bishop Cosin. as were also the words relating to the Atonement ofTered. The general tendency of such alterations by Bishop Cosin was to raise the objective tone of the prayers here and elsewhere, making our addresses to Ciod of a more reverent and humble character. § The Ember Collects. ererij da;/] The principle laid down in the Rubric before the Collects, Epistles, and Ciospels applies to the use of these Collects. One of them ought, therefore, to be said at Even- song of the Saturday before Ember \\'eek, and at Mattins and Evensong every day afterwards until the Ordination Suiulay. The Evensong previous to the latter should be in- cluded as being the eve of the Sund.ay itself. The first of these Ember Collects is to be found in Bishop Cosin's Collection of Private Derations, which was first published in 1627.^ It is also found in the margin of the Durham Prayer Book in his handwriting, with a slight alteration made by him at the end after it was ^^Titten in. No trace of it has hitherto been discovered in any early collections of prayers or in the ancient Services ; and therefore it may be concluded th,at it is an original composition of Bishop Cosin's, to whom we are thus indebted for one of the most beautiful and striking pr,ayers in the Prayer Book, and one which is not surpassed by anything in the ancient Sacra- mentarics or the Eastern Liturgies. Tlie second Collect is taken from the Ordination Services, and is written into the margin of the Durham Prayer Book under the other in the handwriting of Sancroft, having been already inserted at the 1 An earlier odilion was privately printftl, but iliis tli*' writer hns not Rflcn. .Sec llip addreSH of the printer to tlie rea-lcr in a lieauliful copy of Uic lf'27 edition wliich i» preserved in the Briti.sli Museum Library Iprapcts ano Cbanfesgitiings. 237 Church by the precious blood of Thy dear Son ; Mercifully look upon the same, and at this time so guide and govern the minds of Thy servants the Bishops and Pastors of Thy flock, that they may lay hands suddenly on no man, but faith- fully and wisely make choice of fit persons to serve in the sacred Ministry of Thy Church. And to those which shall be ordained to any holy function, give Thy grace and heavenly bene- diction ; that both by their life and doctrine they may set forth Thy glory, and set forward the sal- vation of all men ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. H Or this. ALMIGHTY God, the Giver of all good gifts, -^^A_ "Who of Thy divine providence hast appointed divers orders in Thy Church ; Give Thy grace, we humbly beseech Thee, to all those who are to be called to any oflice and adminis- tration in the same ; and so replenish them with the truth of Thy doctrine, and endue them with innocency of life, that they may faithfully serve before Thee, to the glory of Thy great is'ame, and the benefit of Thy holy Church, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Ameti. IT A Prayer that may be said after any of the former. OGOD, Whose nature and property is ever to have mercy and to forgive, receive our humble petitions ; and though we be tied and bound with the chain of our sins, yet let the piti- fulness of Thy great mercy loose us, for the honour of Jesus Christ, our Mediator and Advocate. Amen. IT A Prayer for the High Court of Parliament to be read during their Session. MOST gracious God, we humbly beseech Thee, as for this Kingdom in general, so especially for the High Court of Parliament, under our most religious and gracious Queen at ^ &nr. Greg. Sacr. Oraltones pro pec. catis. Mur. ii. 300. b Form of Prayer for the fast day in 1625, 1643, i644i and 1648. "T^EUS, Cui proprium est misereri semper et -L^ parcere, suscipe deprecationem nostram : ut quos delictorum catena constringit, miseratio Tua2 pietatis absolvat. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. '~\ /TOST gracious God, we humbly beseech J-V-L Thee, as for this Kingdom in general, so especially for the High Court of Parliament, under our most religious and gracious King at end of tlie Litany in the Prayer Book for the Church of Scotland, printed in 16.37. Under the old system of the Church there were special masses for the Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday at all the four Ember Seasons ; but the use of a special prayer every day daring the Ember Weeks is peculiar to the modern Church of England. It may be added that the very pointed character of the words used is also modern, the older Ember-day Collects and Post-Communions making little direct reference to the ordainers or those to be ordained. The Ember-day Collect is a continual witness before God ■and man of the interest which the whole body of the Church has in the ordination of the Clergy who are to minister in it. The entreaty of St. Paul, "Brethren, pray for us," is the entreaty that continually goes forth to the Church at large from its ministry ; but never with greater necessity, or with greater force, than when the solemn act of Ordination is about to be performed by the Bishops, and a number of the future guides and leaders of the Cliurch are about to be empowered and authorized to undertake their office. This is, in fact, one of the most valuable of our Collects, wielding as it does the strong weapon of general prayer throughout the land on behalf of the Bishops, through whom all ministerial authority and power is conveyed from our Lord, and of the priests and deacons, to whom, from time to time, their ministry is dele- gated. A faithful reliance upon the promises of our Blessed Lord respecting prayer will give us an assurance that so general a supplication for a special object could not be with- out effect ; and no age ever required that such a supplication should be offered more than the present, when the Clergy are growing more and more faithful, but when the necessities of some dioceses lead to a far too promiscuous admission of per- sons who .ire "fit," only by some stretch of language, "to serve in the sacred ministry of God's Church. " It is worth noticing that "the Bishops and Pastors of Thy flock " does not refer to the Bishops and the Priests who with them lay their hands on the heads of those who are ordained Priests. "Bishoi) and Pastor" is the expression used in all the documents connected with the election and confirmation of a Bishop ; and "all Bishops, the Pastors of Thy Church," are prayed for in the first Collect in the Office for Consecration of a Bishop. No doubt the expression is here also used in tlie same sense, with reference to the Bishop as the earthly fountain of pastoral authority, ability [2 Cor. iii. 6], and responsibility. The times for using one or other of these Collects are as follows : — / 1st Sunday From Saturday ; Evensong < Whitsunday) '^«f"''« I Sept. ISth \Dec. 17 th to Saturday Evensong before /'2nd Sunday I in Lent ) Trinity S 1 d^y Sept. 25th 'Dec. 24th lay \ t u- un-\-3 § A Praijer that may be said, etc. This ancient prayer, which is one of the " Orationes pro Peccatis " in the Sacramentary of St. Gregory, comes into our Prayer Book through the Litany of the Salisbury Use, and is found in all the Primers of the English Churcli. It occupied its ancient place in the Litany of 1544, but was omitted from later Litanies until 1559. In KiGl it was transferred to this place, where it stands in the MS. The most ancient Eng- lish version of it known is that of the fourteenth-century Prymer [Maskell's Mommienfa Eitunlin, iii. 110], which is as follows ; — "Ciod, to whom it is propre to be merciful and to spare euermore, undirfonge " (undertake, "take," in Hilsey's Pry- mer) "oure preieris ; and the mercifuluesse of thi pitee asoile hem, that the chayne of trespas bindith. Bi crist oure Lord. So be it." The proper times for the use of this prayer are seasons of penitence. All days in Lent, Fridays, the Rogation Days, and the days of Ember Weeks, are obviously occasions when it comes in with a marked appropriateness ; its use "after any of the former" clearly supposing that "the former" Collects are accompanied by fasting and humiliation. It may also be pointed out as a most suitable prayer for use by Clergy and Laity alike after any confession of sins in private prayer ; or in praying with sick persons, in cases when an authoritative absolution is not to be used. § The Prayer for the Parliament. There is every reason to think that this praj-er, so consonant with the constitutional principles of modern times, was com- posed by Archbishop Laud when Bishop of St. David's. The 238 Jpragcrs anD Cfjanfesgiuings. this time assembled ; That Tlion wouldest be pleased to direct and prosper all their consulta- tions to the advancement of Thj' glory, the good of Thy Church, the safety, honour, and welfare of our Sovereign, and her " Dominions ; that all things may be so ordered and settled by their endeavours upon the best and surest foundations, that peace and happiness, truth and justice, religion and piety may be established among us for all generations. These and all other neces- saries for them, for us, and Thy whole Church ■we humbly beg in the Name and mediation of Jesus Christ our most blessed Loed and Savioue. Ameti. a Ki>t^do*ni\n MS. and Scaled Books. this time assembled : That Thou ■nouldest be pleased to bles.s and direct all their con.sultations to the preservation of Thy glory, the good of Thy Church, the safety, honour, and welfare of our Sovereign, and his Kingdoms. Look, Lord, upon the humility and devotion with which tliey are come into Thy courts. And they are come into Thy house in assured confidence upon the merits and mercies of Christ our blessed Saviour, that Thou wilt not deny them the grace and favour which they beg of Thee. Tlierefore, O Lord, bless them with all that wisdom, which Thou knowest necessary to make the maturity of his Majesty's and their counsels, the happiness and blessing of this commonwealth. These and all other necessaries for them, for us, and Thy whole Church, we humbly beg in the Name and mediation of Christ Jesus our most blessed Lord and Saviour. Amen. II A Collect or Prayer for all conditions of men, to be used at such times when the Litan}' is not appointed to be said. OGOD, the Creator and Preserver of all man- kind, we humbly beseech Thee for all sorts and conditions of men ; that Thou wouldest be pleased to make Thy ways known luito them. Thy saving health unto all nations. Jlore especially', we pray for the good estate of the Catholick Church ; that it may be so guided and governed by Thy good Spirit, that all who pro- fess and call themselves Christians, may be led b Corruption of the old genitive " Christes." into the way of truth, and hold the faith in unity of spirit, in the bond of peace, and in righteous- ness of life. Finally, we commend to Thy fatherly goodness all those, who are any ways afflicted, or distressed, in mind, body, or estate ; \*especiaUy those for whom o?«- » ^his to be ..aid 2}rayers are desired,^ that it may wiien any desire please Thee to comfort and relieve tile coi"'rega- them, according to their several ''°"- necessities, giving them patience under their sufferings, and a happy issue out of all their afflictions. And this we beg for Jesus Christ *His sake. Amen. earliest form in which it is known is that above given, from a Fast-day Service printed in 1625.' It also appears in at least two Forms of Prayer which were issued by Laud after he became Archbishop of Canterbury, and during tlie rule of that '•Long" Parliament by tlie influence of which he and the King suffered. It does not appear in a folio copy of "Prayers for the Parliament," wliioh is bound up at tlie beginning of Bishop Cosin's Durham Prayer Book, but it was inserted in a Fast-day Service for the 12th of June IGGl, and afterwards in its present place. The word ' ' Dominions " was substituted for " Kingdoms " by an Order in Council of January 1, 1801. As, however, tlie ancient style of our kings was " Ilex Anglian, Donihius Hiberniie," tliis seems to have been a constitutional mistake, as well as a questionable interference with the Prayer Book; but probably "dominions" was supposed to be the more compreheusive word, and one more suitable than "king- doms " to an empire so extended and of so mixed a character as that of the English Sovereigns. Tliere is some reason to think that this is not the prayer which it was originally intended to insert here ; the follow- ing entries appearing in tlic Journal of the Lower House of Convocation for IGOl : "May 24. A prayer or collect to be made for the parliament sitting, and one for tlie synod : referred to Dr. Pory and tlie Arohliisliop's other chaplains to draw up and present the same to tliis House the next session." "May 31. Dr. Pory introduxit forniam precationum pro parliamento et synodo. The approbation of them referred to the Dean of ^Ve]I3 (Dr. Creightoii), Dr. Creed, Dr. Pearson, Dr. Crowther, and tlie Archbishop's two chajilains. " [Cahd- WELi.'.s (Jonf. p. 374.] But a general fast was ordered for June 12th, and in the Fonn of Pr.ayer printed for use on tliat occasion the Prayer for the Parliament ajipcai's in its present form. This looks as if the modification of the pr.ayer of 1625 had been adopted as having already had Koyal sanction ; and ' 1 " A Forme of Common Pmycr , , . to be rend every Wcdncsdiiy during the present viHititlon, Ket fortli by Ills MiiJoHtie's Autliority. Reprinted at London by IJonliajn Xorf:on nnd'Jolin Hill, rrinters to tlie King's most exccllout Majcatic. Anuo \ii'X>." as if it was afterwards substituted for Dr. Pory's proposed prayers for the Parliament and tlie Convocation. This prayer may have been intended only for use before the several Houses of Parliament, wlieu it was inserted here in 16G1. Yet the remarks made on the Ember Collect apply to it in no small degree ; and the general prayers of the Church may be expected to bring down a blessing upon the delibera- tions of the Parliament in a higher degree than the local prayers daily used in eacli House. It may be mentioned that the expression "inost great, learned, and rdUjious king, " is contained in James I. 's Act for a Thanksgiving on the Fifth of November. § Prayer for all Conditions of Men. This prayer was composed by Dr. Peter Gunning, after- wards Bishop, successively, of Chichester and Ely, and one of tlie chief instruments, under God, in the restoration of the I'rayer Book to national use in 1662. It has usually been suiiposed to be a condensed form of a longer prayer, in which he had endeavoured to satisfy the objections of the Puritans against the collect form of the F'ive Prayers, by amalgamating the substance of them into one. The lirst idea of it seems, however, to be taken from the nine ancient Collects for Good Friday, of which we only retain tln'ee. Dr. Bisse states that when (iunning was Master of St. John's College, Cambridge, he would not allow this prayer to bo used at Evensong, declaring lliat he liad composed it only for Morning use, as a substitute for the Litany. And certainly, if it liad been in- tended for constant use, it is strange that it was not placed before the Prayer of St. Chrysostom in Morning ami Evening Pr.ayer, but among the "Prayers upon Several Occasions." Tlio original intention must certainly liave been to confine this general supplication to occasional use ; and the meaning of "to be used" is probably identical with "that may be used." There arc circumstances under wliich it m.ay be desir- alilc to sliorten tlio Service ; and if the omission of tliis prayer can thus be considered as permissible, it will offer one means of doing so. Ptayccs auD Cljank.sgitimgs. 239 'THANKSGIVINGS. IT A General Thanksgiving. ALMIGHTY God, Father of all mercies, we /» Thine unworthy servants do give Thee most humble and hearty thanks for all Thy good- ness and loving-kindness to us, and to all men ; • Thi3 to be said [* pM'ticidcirly to (hose who desire when any that now to offer up their praises and loTdeafre'l'o^i-o- thanhsyiviiigs for Thy late mercies turn praise. vouchsafed wito them.] We bless Thee for our creation, preservation, and all the blessings of this life ; but above all, for Thine inestimable love in the redemption of the world by our Lord Jesus Christ ; for the means of grace, and for the hope of glory. And, we beseech Thee, give us that due sense of all Thy mercies, that our hearts may be unfeignedly thankful, and that we '''shew forth Thy praise, not only with our lips, but in our lives ; by giving up our .selves to Thy service, and by walking before Thee in holiness and righteousness all our days ; through Jesus Christ our Lord, to Whom with Thee and the Holy Ghost be all honour and glory, world without end. Amen. IT For Rain. OGOD our heavenly F.\ther, Wlio by Thy gracious providence dost cause the former and the latter rain to descend upon the earth, that it may bring forth fruit for the use of man ; We give Thee humble thanks that it hath pleased Thee, in our great necessity, to .send us at the n 5« notes below. i Al. may slieiv forth. as m Irish MS. last a joyful rain upon Thine inlieritance, and to refresh it when it was dry, to the gi'eat comfort of us Thy unworthy servants, and to the glory of Tliy holy Name ; through Thy mercies in Je.sus Christ our Lord. Amen. U For fair weather. OLUltD God, Who hast justly humbled us by Thy late plague of immoderate rain and waters, and in Thy mercy hast relieved and com- forted our souls by this seasonable and blessed change of weather ; We praise and glorify Thy holy Name for this Thy mercy, and will always declare Thy loving-kindness from generation to generation ; through Jesus Christ oui- Lord. Ame7i. IT For Plenty. OMOST merciful Father, Who of Thy gracious goodness hast heard the devout prayers of Thy Church, and turned our dearth and scarcity into cheapness and plenty ; We give Thee humble thanks for this Thy special bounty; beseeching Thee to continue Thy loving-kindness unto us, that our land may yield us her fruits of increase, to Thy glory and our comfort ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. IT For peace and deliverance from our enemies. OALJIIGHTY God, Who art a strong tower of defence unto Thy servants against the face of their enemies ; W^e yield Thee praise and thanksgiving for our deliverance from Tlie prayer is cast in the mould of tliat for tlie Church in the Commuuion Service. Bishop Cosin altered the preface of that prayer to "Let us pray for the good estate of Christ's Catholicic Cliurcli," and the title of the prayer in tlie Rubric at the end of the Comnumion Service was altered by him in the same way. Tlie title was often so printed in the last century, and had ajipeared in the same ftjnii in a book of Hours printed in 1531. [See notes on Prayer for Church in Communion Service.] The tone and the language of the prayer very successfully imitate those of the ancient collects, and the condensation of its petitions shews how thoroughly and spiritually the author of it entered into the worth of that ancient mode of prayer, as distinguished from the verbose meditations wliich were substituted for it in the Occasional Services of James I. The petition, " That all who profess and call themselves Christians, may be led into the way of trutli, " was evidently framed with reference to the Puritan Nonconformists, who had sprung up in such large numbers during the great Rebellion ; but it is equally applicable as a prayer of charity for Dissenters at all times ; and no words could be more gentle or loving than these, when connected with the petitions for unity, peace, and rigliteousness whicli follow. The concluding petitions have an analogy with the Jlemoriai Communes of the Salisbury Use, ' ' Pro quacunque tribulatioue, " and ' ' Pro infirmo. " In another Memoria, that " Pro aniico" which comes between these two, the name of the person prayed for was mentioned, which may have suggested the parenthetical reference to individuals in this prayer.^ There was, beside these Common ^Memorials, a Daily Prayer for the Sick in the Service at Prime, as follows : — Omnipotens sempiterne Almighty and everlasting Deus : salus sterna creden- God, tlie eternal salvation of tiuni, exaudi nos pro famulis them that believe, hear us on 1 Bishop Cosin proviiled a short service to be used in tliis place for any persons desiring tlie piayeis of tlie Church. [.See the note at tlie end of the Visitation Office, p. 47(i.] tuis pro quibus misericordiaj tu;e imploramus auxilium ; ut reddita sibi sanitate, gratiarum tibi in ecclesia tua referant actiones. Per Christum. Amen. [Gelas.] behalf of those Thy servants for wliom we beseech the help of Tliy mercy ; that health be- ing restored unto them, they may render thanks to Thee in Thy Church ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. It is a very excellent practice, when any are known to be dying, to commend them to the prayers of the Church (by name or otherwise) before the Pnayer for all Conditions of Men is said. It is equally applicable to cases of mental or bodily distress, as well as to its more familiar use in the case of sick persons; and the afflictions or distresses of "mind, body, or estate," which are so tersely but comprehensively named, shew clearly tliat the special clause of intercession was not by any means intended to be limited to sickness. THE OCCASIONAL THANKSGIVINGS. These were all placed as they now stand in 1661 ; but they were, with two exceptions, printed at the end of the Litany (by Royal autliority only), after tlie Hampton Court Confer- ence in 1604. The particular circumstances under wliich tliis liberty was taken witli the Prayer Book by James I. are men- tioned in the Historical Introduction. It is unnecessary to add anything further hero than that tlie Occasional Thanks- givings are now as entirely a jiart of tlie Prayer Book sanc- tioned by the Church as any other prayers. § The General Tlianhsgiving. This is called "General " because it is a Thanksgiving on behalf of "all men," as the preceding collect or praj'cr is " for .all conditions of men." It was composed or compiled by Reynolds, Bishop of Nor- ■wich, for the revision of 1661. The first portion of it appears to be borrowed from the following opening of a Thanksgiving composed by Queen Elizabeth after one of lier progresses, and which is printed (from a copy in tlie State Paper Office) in the 240 lPraper.8 anD Cfjanfesgiuings. those great and apparent dangers -wherewith we were compassed : We acknowledge it Thy good- ness that we were not delivered over as a prey unto them ; beseeching Thee still to continue such Thy mercies towards us, that all the world may know that Thou art our Saviour and mighty Deliverer; through Jesus Chkist our Lord. Anie7i. IT For restoring publick peace at home. O ETERNAL God, our heavenly Father, Who alone makest men to be of one mind in a house, and stillest the outrage of a violent and unruly people; We bless Thy holy Name, that it hath pleased Thee to appease the seditious tumults which have been latelj- raised up amongst us ; most humbly beseeching Thee to grant to all of us grace, that we may henceforth obediently walk in Thy holy commandments ; and, leading a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty, may continually offer \mto Thee our sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving for these Thy mercies towards us ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. IT For deliverance from the Plague, or other common sickness. LOED God, Who hast wounded us for our sins, and consumed us for our transgres- o sions, by Thy late heavy and dreadful visitation ; and now, in the midst of judgement remember- ing mercy, hast redeemed our souls from the jaws of death ; We offer unto Thy fatherly goodness our selves, our souls and bodies, which Thou hast delivered, to be a living sacrifice unto Thee, always praising and mag- nifying Thy mercies in the midst of Thy Church ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. H Or this. \ \ 7"E humbly acknowledge before Thee, O VV most merciful Father, that all the punishments which are threatened in Thy law might justly have fallen upon us, by reason of our manifold transgressions and hardness of heart ; Yet seeing it hath pleased Thee of Thy tender mercy, upon our weak and unworthy humiliation, to assuage the contagious sickness wherewith we lately have been sore afflicted, and to restore the voice of joy and health into our dwellings ; W'e offer unto Thy Divine Majesty the sacrifice of praise and thanks- giving, lauding and magnifying Thy glorious Name for such Thy preservation and providence over us ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Attien. " Liturgies of Queen Elizabeth" of the Parker Society, p. 667 : "I render unto Thee, Merciful and Heavenly Father, most humble and hearty tlianks for Thy manifold mercies so abun- dantly bestowed upon me, as ■\\e\l for my creation, preserva- tion, regeneration, and all other Tliy benefits and great mercies exhibited in Christ Jesus ..." But it is possible that there is some older prayer, as yet unnoticed, which was the original of both Queen Elizabeth's and Bishop Eeynolds'. The remarks whicli have been made respecting the special clause in the " Prayer for all Conditions of Men," apply also to the special clause in the General Thanksgiving. There is no authority whatever for the congregation say- ing the General Tlianksgiving with or after the Minister. Wherever this is intended the several clauses of the formulary are printed with capital initials. § For restoring puhliclc peace at home. This is to be found in the margin of Cosin's Durham Prayer Rook in his handwriting, but the original draft of it is due to Bishop Wren, who wrote it in the following form : — " A Tlumksijifinij for the Restoring of Public Peace. " Eternal God, our Heavenly Father, Who alone makest men to be of one mind in an house, and art the God of peace and unity in every nation, we bless Thy Holy Name for this gracious change among us, and that it hath pleased Thee with so high a hand to appease these seditions and tumults which by the subtlety of the Devil were raised up and long fomented among us, and so to subdue the oppositions of men of evil minds as that, through Thy grace, we may now assemble in peace and safety to offer up unto Thee this our sacrifice of jjraise and thanksgiving through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen." ' There were two other changes made in the course of writ- ing it, with the evident object of moulding it in as charitable a form as possible. " Madness of a raging and unreasonable people" was one of the original phrases ; and, "Grant that we may henceforth live in peace and unity," was another; and both are altered in Cosin's own writing. This Thanks- giving offers another illustration of the restrained and tem- perate spirit in which the restoration of the Prayer Book and its revision were undertaken by men who had suffered so much from the "outrage of a violent and unruly people," as Wren, Cosin, and their coadjutors had suffered for many years. Except the General Thanksgiving, none of these Occasional Thanksgivings are well adapted to the necessities of present times ; and the introduction of several new " MemoriK Com- ^ munes " would be a good work of revision, provided they I were worded in language whose suitableness and dignity I made them fit to be placed beside more ancient parts of the 1 Prayer Book. I 1 Bishop Jacobson'e Fragmentary Illustrations of Prayer Book, p. 64. AN INTRODUCTION COLLECTS, EPISTLES, AND GOSPELS. The Liturgy consists of a fixed and unvarying portion, and of a portion wliich varies at least once a week ; the fixed part is printed by itself in a later division of the Prayer Book, and the variable part is that included under the title of "The Collects, Epistles, and Gospels, to be used throughout the year," and now coming under notice. In the early ages of the Church the Office of the Holy Com- munion was contained in several separate voUunes, one for the Epistles, called the Comes, Lectionarius, or Epistolarium ; another for the Gospels, called the Evangelistarium ; a third for the Anthems, called the Antiphonarius, or Gradual ; and a fourth for the fixed part of the Service and the Collects, which went by the name of the Liber Sacramentorum, or Sacramentary. Tliese four separate volumes were eventually united into one,' under the name of the Missal ; and the two portions of the Prayer Book in which the varying and unvary- ing parts of the Communion Service are contained constitute, in fact, the Missal of the CImrch of England, wliich is almost universally bound in a separate form for use at the Altar. The modern arrangement of these variable parts of the Liturgy is derived directly from the ancient Missals of the Church of England, of which the principal one was that of Salisbury. Like the rest of the Prayer Book, it has under- gone some condensation. Oflertory sentences were formerly placed in this part of the Liturgy, but are now collected into the unvarying portion. There was also a short Anthem, or Gradual (with its response), jjlaced after every Epistle, and a Collect called " Post-Communio, " but both of these have been discontinued. The Introit, or Officium,- was likewise appointed for every celebration of the Holy Communion, and a short Anthem, the "Conimunio, " to be sung during the Administration. In the first Prayer Book the Introits were taken from the Psalms,^ and each one was printed before its 1 The tendency to condense all the Office.? of Divine Services into one volume is shewn in the fact that printed Breviaries often contained the Preparation, the Ordinary, the Canon, a Mass for the Dead, and several votive Masses. The following are examples : Brit. Mus. Lib. Saruni, 1499 [C. 41 a], 1510 [C. 35 d]. Bodl. Lib. Sarum, 1507 [Gough Miss. 73], 1514 [Id. 9|, 1.535 [Id. 192, 103], 1541 [Id. 38]. 2 See the notes for the First Sunday in Advent [p. 247] for the mode in which the Office or Introit was anciently sung. 3 It may be useful to annex a list of the Introits as arranged in the First English Prayer Boolv. as many Ritualists think tliem better adapted fur their purpose than hymns ;— INTROITS. Psalm 1st Sunday in Advent i. 2nd ,, ., cxx. 3rd „ ,, iv. «h „ ,, V. Christ. Day, 1st Communion xcviii. ,, 2nd ,, viii. F. of St. Stephen lii. ,, St. John, Evangelist. .. xi. ,, the Holy Innocents Ixxix. Sunday after Christmas cxxi. Circumcision cxxii. Epiphany xcvi. IstSundayaftertheEpiphany xiii. 2nd ,, ,, ,, xiv. 3rd „ ,, „ XV. 4th , ii. 5th ,, „ ,, XX. 6th „ . „ „ XX. Septuagesima xxiii. Sexagesima xxiv. Quinquagesima xxvi. Aslv Wednesday vi. 1st Sunday in Lent xxxii. 2nd ,, cxxx. 3rd ,, , xliii. 4th xlvi. 6th ,, ,, liv. Sunday next before Easter . . Ixi. Good Friday. Easter Even . Psalm xxii. Ixxxviii. Easter Day, 1st Coraniuuion I, 2nd Monday in Easter Week . . . Tuesday , 1st Sunday after Easter . . . 2nd .,' 3rd 4th „ 6th Ascension Day Sunday after Ascension Day Whitsunday Monday in Whitsuu Week Tuesday ,, ,, Trinity Sunday 1st Sun. after |_ -. ■ I Beati imma- ~ ■ ■■ I • "( nilati. \ lii quo cor- \ riget? t Retribne " \ servo tuo. 1 Adhcssit pa- '- \ vim^nto. 5th ,, ,, ..I^genipone. 6th ,, ,, ..Etvenlat, 7th ,, ,, , .Meinor esto. Ixii. cxiii. cxii. Ixx. Ixxv. Ixxxii. Ixxxiv. xtvii. xciii. xxxiii. Ixvii. Trinity 2nd 3rd 4th Collect ; but hymns have been generally substituted since their omission. The "Communio " was also fixed in the first Prayer Book, being the Anthem, " Lamb of God, Which takest away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us ; " and fur this, a soft and solemn organ voluntary seems to have been afterwards substituted, such as is still to be heard at Durham Cathedral and elsewhere during the Administration. Twenty-two Post - Communions were also provided and printed after the Agnus Dei. These were sentences from the Gospels and Epistles of the New Testament : and the Rubric preceding them ordered that one should be sung by the Clerks when the Communion was ended. This arrangement of the variable parts of the Communion Service is, however, much more ancient than the Salisbury Missal. The selection of the Epistles and Gospels for the Sundays and some of the otlier Holydays is attributed to St. Jerome in the fourth century ; and most of the Collects come to us originally from the Sacramentaries of .St. Leo, St. Gelasius, and St. C^regory ; the last of v/hom died a.d. 604. § Collects. The Collects which are now used iii the Communion Service appear to be the growth of the fifth and sixth centuries, as is stated above ; though it is far from being improbable that the Sacramentaries of that date were, to a large extent, com- pilations of previously existing forms, rather than original compositions of those whose names they bear. These Sacra- mentaries have the appearance of methodizing and rearrang- ing established customs and formularies ; and there is an antecedent improbability in tlie statement that SS. Leo, Gregory, or any other single individual, invented so large a body of public devotions, and wrought so great a revolution in the habits of tlie Church, as to bring it suddenly into use. Cardinal Bona [Rer. Litunj. ii. 5; iv.] gives some evidence in support of the supposed Apostolic origin of the form of prayer known by the name of Collect, though he thinks the general tradition of the Christian world a sufficient proof that St. Gelasius and St. Gregor}' composed tliose now in use. It niay be considered an argument against this theory of Apostolic origin that the Collect is a form of prayer unknown in the Eastern Church, which lias always been so conserva- tive with regard to its ancient customs and formularies. But Freeman has shewn that there is a distinct likeness between certain kinds of hymns (called "Exaposteilaria") of the Eastern Church, and the Collects of the Western, by which a common Psalm cxxiv. rsalm '"Stf"l«--^<"-'"""- 9tli 10th 11th 12th 13th 17th ISth 19th 20th ( Bonitafem. \ fecisti. .Manifs tncc. jDefccit aiii- l ma. i In (eter- \ num. I Qnomodo di- ( Iczi. 1 Luceriia pe- \ thhus. \ Iniqnos \ odio. I Fecijjidi- \ civm. . .Mirabilia. . .Justus e$. J Clamavi in i toto. ( Vide hvmi- \ lilatcm. j Priticipes ( persecuti. 22nd Sun. after ) Trinity i 23rd 24th „ cxiv. 2oth ,, cxxvii. St. Andrew, Apostle cxxix. St. Tiiomas, Apcistle exxviii. Conversion of tit. Paul .... exxxviii. Purification of St. Mary, V. cxxxiv. St. Mattliias, Apostle Annunciation of the Yir- > gin Mary > St. Mark. Evang St. Pltilip and St. James. . . St. Barnabas, Apostle St. Joliii Baptist St. Peter, Apostle cxliv. St. James. Apostle cxlviii. St. Bartholomew. Apostle.. c-xv. St. Matthew, Apostle cxvii. St. Michael and all Angels. cxiii. St. Luke. Evangelist cxxxvii. St. Simon and St. Jude, Apostles cl. All Saints cxlix cxl. cxli. cxxx iii. cxiii. cxliii. 242 an 3lntroDuction to tfjc Collects, Cpistles, ano Gospels. origin seems to be indicated ; and he gives the following hymns at Lauds on Easter Day as an example [Fkebmak's Principles of Divine Service, i. 142]: — "Thou, O Lord, that didst endure the cross, and didst abolish death, and didst rise again from the dead, give peace in our life, as only Almiglity. " "Thou, Christ, Who didst raise man by Thy resurrection, vouchsafe that we may with pure hearts hymn and glorify Thee. " Although the variable Exaposteilaria in actual use are attributed to a Ritualist of the tenth centurj', Freeman con- siders that tliey represent a much older system of precatory hymns, and quotes from Neale that the aim of them "seems originally to have been a kind of invocation 0/ the grace of God," which is a special feature of Collects. It is not quite correct, therefore, to say that such a form of prayer is wholly unknown in the Eastern Church ; and this argument against the primitive antiquity of it cannot be con- sidered to have much force. There are two, and only two, prayers of the Church given in the New Testament. Both of these are in the Acts of the Apostles, and both of them have a striking similarity to the prayers we now know as Collects. The first is, " Thou, Lord, Which knowest the hearts of aU men, sliew whether of these two Thou hast chosen, that he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place." [Acts i. 24, 25.] Tlie second is, ' ' Lord, Thou art God, Which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in tliera is : Who by the mouth of Thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things ? The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against His Christ. For of a truth against Thy holy Child Jesus, Whom Thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, for to do whatsoever Thy hand and Thy counsel determined before to be done. And now. Lord, behold their threatenings ; and grant unto Thj' servants, that with all boldness they maj' speak Tliy word, by stretch- ing forth Thine hand to heal ; and that signs and wonders may be done by the Name of Thy holy Cliild Jesus." [Acts iv. 24-30.] In both of these prayers, the address, or invoca- tion, is a prominent feature ; and in the latter it occupies more than two-thirds of the whole prayer ; while the actual supplication itself, though in both cases of the highest impor- tance possible, is condensed into a few simple words. These Apostolic prayers, therefore, bear a great resemblance to Col- lects, and might not unreasonably be spoken of as the earliest on record. But the real model of this form of prayer is to be found in a still higher quarter, the Lord's Prayer itself. If we com- pare some of the best of our ancient or modern Collects (as, for instance, the Collect for Whitsunday, which has been familiarly known to the Church in her daily Service for at least twelve centuries and a half, or that for the Sunday after Ascension, which is partly of Reformation date) with the Prayer of Prayers, we shall find in both that the tone is chiefly that of adoration, and subordinately tljat of supplica- tion ; and, also, tliat the human prayer follows the Divine pattern in the adoption of a condensed form of expression, which is in strict accordance with the injunction, "God is in heaven, and thou upon earth, therefore let thy words be few." Such a comparison will bring home a conviction to the mind, that when we use tliis terse form of mixed adoration and prayer we are not far from carrying out, with literal exactness, the still more authoritative injunction of Him Who gave us His own prayer as the type of all others, "After this manner, therefore, pray ye."' The origin of tlie name "Collect " is uncertain ; and various meanings liave been given to it. Some Ritualists have con- nected it with the collected assembly- of the people ; others have inter|>reted the name as indicating that the prayer so called collects together the topics of previous prayers, or else 1 It is ail ancient rule of tlie Church to Iiavc an uneven number of Col- lecU. MicroloKus [iv.J says tliat eitlicr one, tliree, five, or seven are used : one from traditiun ; three, Ijecause our Lord jtrayed thrice in His Agony; Uve, because of Ilis fivefold Passion ; seven, because there are seven peti- tions in the Lord's Prayer. A general Rubric of the Saruin Missal says, '* More than seven Collects are never to be said, for Christ in the Lord's Prayer did not exceed seven jictitions. An uneven number of Collects is always to bo preserved, except in Christmas We>pirit; grant us by the same Spirit to have a right judgement in all things, and evermore to rejoice in His holy comfort ; through the merits of Christ Jesus our Saviour, Who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the unity of the same Spirit, one God, world without end. 6th Sunday after Epiphany. O GOD, Whose blessed Son was manifested that He might destroy the works of the devil, and make us the sons of God, and heirs of eternal life ; grant us, we beseech Thee, that having Jhis hope, we may pnrify oui-selves, even as lie is pure ; that when He shall appear again witli power and great glory, we may be made like unto Him in His eternal and glorious Kingdom, where with Thee, O Father, and Thee, O Holy Ghost, lie liveth and n-ignetb, ever one God, world with- out end. Thus it will be observed that, "after the Invocation, a foundation is laid for the petition by tlio recital of some doctrine, or of some fact of Gospel history, wliicli is to bo commemorated. Upcui this foundation so laid down rises the petition or body of the prayer. Then, in a perfect speci- men . . . the ])otitioii has the wings of a holy aspiration given to it, wiicrL'upon it may soar to heaven. Then fnllows the conclusion, whicli, in tlie case of prayers not addressed to the an 3lntroDuction to tH Collects, Cpistlcs, anD (Sospc(0. 243 Mediator, is always through the Mediator, ami which some- times involves a Doxology, or Ascription of praise. " ' This last member of the Collect has, indeed, always been con- structed witli great care, and according to rules which were put into the form of memorial verses, at a period when it was the custom to write the Collect in a sliort form, and only to indicate the ending by "per," "Quivivis," "pereundem," or wliatever else were its first word or words. One of these aids to memory is as follows ; — " ' Per Dominum,' dicas si Patrem Presbyter oras. Si Christum nieniores 'per Euudem,' dicere debes. Ri loqueris Christo 'Qui vivis,' scire memento; 'Qui Tecum,' si sit collecta- linis in Ipso ; Si memores Flamen ; 'Ejusdem, ' die propc fmem. " Illustrations of these several endings will be found in the Collects for the Epiphany, the Nativity, Easter Day, and Whitsun Ray. The number of the variable Collects in the Book of Com- mon Prayer is eighty-three. They are all traced to their original sources, so far as these have been discovered, in the following pages ; and the annexed Table gives a compendious view of the origin and dates of the whole number. § Table of Collects. Translated from Collects of the Early Church which h.id been in the English Service- books from at least a,d. 1085 Translated or adapted from very ancient Prayers, An- thems, etc. Composed expressly for the Book of Common Prayer. First found in the Sacramen- First found in the Sacramen- First found in tlie Sacramcn- tary of St. Leo, Bishop of taryof St. Gelasius, Bishop tary of St. Gregory, Bishop Rome, A.D. 440-461. of Rome, a.d. 492-496. of Rome, a.d. 690-604. 3rd Sunday after Easter. 4th Sunday in Advent. St, Stephen. 1st Sunday in Advent. A.D. 1549. 5th Sunday after Trinity. Iloly Innocents. St. Jolin the Evangelist. Christma.s Day. 2nd Sunday in Advent. 'Jth Sunday before Easter. CircuuKtision. Ash-Wednesday. Quinquagesima. 10th Good Friday [2nd and 3rd Epiphany. 1st Sunday after Easter. 1st Sunday in Lent. 12th Collects]. 1st Sunday after Epiphan^■. 2ud Sunday after Easter. 13th Easter Day. 2nd St. Thomas. 14th ,, ,, 4th Sunday after Easter. 3rd ,, St. Matthias. 6th -llli SS. Philip and James. Sunday after Ascension. 6th St. Barnabas. 1st Sunday after Trinity. Septuagesinia. St. John Baptist, 2nd Sexagesinia. St. Peter. 6th 2nd Sunday in Lent. St. James. 7th 3rd „ St. Matthew. 8th 4th St. Luke. 11th 6th SS. Simon and Jude. 15th Good Friday [1st Collect]. All Saints. 16th Ascension I>ay. A D. 1552. 18th „ ,, Whilsun Day. St. Andrew. 19th Trinity Sunday. A.D. ICOl. 20th 3rd Sunday after Trinity. 3rd Sunday in Advent. 21st ,, ,, 4th nth 22nd 23rd 24th 26th Conversion of St. Paid. Purification. Annunciation. St. Mark. St. Bai-tholomew. St. Michael and all Angels. 6th Sunday after Epiphany. Easter Even. The primary use of the Collect is to give a distinctive tone to the Eucharistic Service, striking the keynote of prayer for the particular occasion on which the Sacrifice is offered. But by the constant use of it in its appointed place in the Dailj' Mattins and Evensong, it also extends this Eucliaristie speciality into the other public Services of the Church, and carries it forward from one celebration to another, linking these Offices on to the chief Service and Offering which the Church has to render to Almighty God. " Used after such celebration, the Collect is endued witli a wonderful power for carrying on through the week the peculiar Eucharistic memories and work of the preceding Sunday, or of a Festival. Under whatsoever engaging or aweing aspect our Lord has more especially come to us then in virtue of the appointed Scriptures, the gracious and healthful visitation lives on in memory, nay, is prolonged in fact. Or in whatever special respect, again, suggested by these same Scriptures, and em- bodied for us in the Collect, we ha\'e desired to present our- selves ' a holy and lively sacrifice ' in that high ordinance, the same oblation of ourselves do we carry on and perpetuate by it. Tlirough the Collect, in a word, we lay continually upon the altar our present sacrifice and service, and receive, in a manner, from the altar, a continuation of the heavenly gift. " ^ Tlius it is a constant memorial before God of the great Memorial which joins on the work of the Church on earth to the intercession of our Mediator in heaven ; and it is also a 1 GouLBURN on the Commuuwn Office, ]t. 37. Dean Goulliurn's later work. The Collects of the Day, in 2 vols., 1880, is a treasury of learned and devotional comments uxion tliem. 3 A mucli longer form may be found at p. 73 of Chambers' Sarum Psalter, with an elaborate note on the subject. The following rules may prove sufticient fiu* practical purposes at the present day :— [1] Collects addressed to God the Father should end : "Through Jesus Christ our Lord [or if our Lord has been prcviouslymentioiwd : 'Through the same Jesus Christ our Lord'], Who liveth and reigneth with Tliee and the [nr if the Holy Ghost has been previously Dientioncd : 'The same'] Holy Ghost, one God, world without end. Amen." [2l Collects addressed to Go.l the Son should end : " Who livest and memorial to the mind of every worshipper of the sanctification which is brought upon all our days and all our prayers by the Sacramental Presence of our Blessed Lord. [.S'ce also p, 200. ] § The Epistles ami Gospels. Tlie Holy Communion was celebrated and received bj' the faitliful for nearlj' twenty years before St. Paul wrote his first Epistle, and for nearly thirty years before the first Gospel was written by ,St. Matthew ; and none of the Gospels or Epistles are likely to have been generally known in the Church until even a much later time. The Scriptures of the New Testament did not, therefore, form any part of the original Liturgies.^ It has been supposed by many Ritualists that portions of the Old Testament were read at the time of the celeljration : and the gradual introduction of our present system is indicated by the usage shewn in an Irish Communion Book of the sixth century, which has one unvarj'ing Epistle and Gospel, 1 Cor. xi., and S. John vi. This system is attributed to St. Jerome by the almost unanimous voice of ancient writers on the Divine Service of the Church ; and a very ancient Book of Epistles and Gospels exists, called the Comes, which has gone by the name of St. Jerome at least since the time of Amalarius and Micrologus, in the ninth and eleventh centuries. The antiquity of the Comes Hieronymi has been disputed, reignest with the Father and the [or 'the same'] Holy Ghost, one God, world without end. Amen," [3] Collects addressed to the Blessed Trinity should end : " Wlio livest and reignest, one God, world without end. Amen." Some other variations, as " Where with Thee," after the mention of Heaven, will suggest themselves. Tlie beautiful doxological ending which is found in many of the English Collects does not appear in the Latin originals. ^ Freeman's Principles of Divine Service, i. 369. ^ On the other hand, there are those who believe that several exjTessions in the New Testament Scrijitures are derived from Liturgies known to and used by the Apostles, [,Sfc an Essay on Liturgical Quotations in N'eale's Liturfjioloay . pp, 411-474,] 244 an 3lntrorJuction to tbc Collects, (2Bpistles, anD (Sospcls. chiefly because the system of Epistles and Gospels which it contains differs from that of the Roman rite ; but there seem to be several good reasons for supposing that it really belongs to as early a time as that of St. Jerome ; and as its system agrees with the old and modern English one, where it differs from tlie Roman, the question has a special interest in con- nection with the Book of Common Prayer. This ancient Lectionary, or Comes, was published by Pamelius in the second volume of his I.Uunjkon Eccleskt: Lalince, under the title, Divi Hieronymi j^resbyteri Comes siri' Lectionarius, and is also to be found in the eleventh volume of St. Jerome's Works, p. 526. It contains Epistles and Gospels for all the Sundays of tlie year, the Festivals of our Lord, some other Festivals, and many Ferial days. It is some evidence in favour of its great antiquity that no saints are commemorated in it of a later date than tlie time of St. Jerome ; and that the Epiphany is called ))y the name of the Theophany, a name which was discontinued not long after in the Western Church. The Conies is mentioned in the Charta Cornutiana, a foundation deed belonging to a church in France, and printed by Mabillon [Lit. Gall. Pref. vii], and this charter is as early as a.d. 471. It is mentioned by Amalarius [iii. 40], who wrote a.d. 820; and in Micrologus [xxv.], a liturgical treatise of about a.d. 1080, it is spoken of as "Liber Comitis sive Lectionarius, quem Sanctus Hierony- mus compagiiiavit :" while about the same time Beleth [Ivii.] writes that Pope Damasus requested St. Jerome to make a selection of Scriptures from the Old and New Testament to be read in the Church. Tlie latter statement derives con- firmation from the fact that before the time of Damasus [a.d. 366-384] the Fathers cite Scripture witliout giving any indications of such a selection being in use : while after that time there are such indications in the writings of SS. Ambrose, Augustine, Leo, Salvian, and Cfesarius ; tlie three latter of whom were accustomed to use St. Jerome's version of the Scriptures, and not the Septuagint. All this seems to shew that there is much to be said for the ancient statement that St. Jerome first arranged the Epistles and Gospels, and that his arrangement is extant in this Lectionary. In the Comes there are Scriptures for twenty-five Sundays after the Octave of Pentecost, as in our Prayer Book and in the ancient Salisbury Use (though in both the latter they are numbered as after Trinity), but the Roman rite has them only as far as the twenty-third Sunday after Pentecost. The Epistles and Gospels for these twenty-five Sundays and those for Advent exactly agree with the ancient and modern English, which (as will be seen in the references annexed to every Sunday in the following pages) are quite different in arrangement from the Roman. The Comes also contains Epistles and Gospels for Wednesdays and Fridays in Epiphany, Easter, and Trinity seasons, which were in tlie Salisbury Missal, but are not in the Roman. It has also five Sundays before Christmas (that is, in Advent), instead of four, a peculiarity of notation which indicates very early origin, and which is reproduced in the "Sunday next before Advent " and four Sundays in Advent, of the English Use. These parallel peculiarities between the Comes and the English arrangement, differing as they do from the Roman, form a strong proof that our Eucharistic system of ScrijitureB had an origin quite independent of the Roman Liturgy ; or, at least, that it be- longs to a system which is much older than that now in use in the latter. It may be remarked, in conclusion (and per- haps this is the most important fact in connection with this diversity), that the Collects, Epistles, and Gospels for Trinity Season are all in harmony in the English Missal, while that harmony is entirely dislocated in the Roman. The principle on which portions of Holy Scripture are selected for the Epistles and Gospels is that of illustrating the two great divisions of the Christian year, from Advent to Trinity, and from Trinity to Advent. In the one, and more emphatic division, our Blessed Lord is set before us in a life- like diorama of Gospels, which tell us about Him and His work, not as in a past history, but with that present force, wherewith the events of His life and suffering are pleaded in the Litany. In nothing is the grapliic action of the Church (sometimes very truly called "histrionic'') shewn more strongly than in the way by which the (iospcls of the season are made the meams of our living over again, year b\' year, the time of the Incarnation, from Bethlehem to Bethany ; wliile in the long-drawn season of Trinity, we see the Church's continuance by the power of the I'enteco.stal outpouring in the true faith of the Blessed Trinity, and in the faithful foUmving of licr Master and Head through a long probation.Try career. The Bpecial bearing of each ( losjiel and Epistle on the day for which it is appointed will be shewn in the Notes that follow. It is sufficient here to say, in conclusion, that tlie existing arrangement of tliem appears to be founded on some more ancient system of consecutive reading similar to that in use for our daily Lessons, a system still followed out in the East : that the Epistles have continued to be used in a con- secutive order, but that the Gospels have been chosen with the special object of illustrating tlie season ; or, where there is nothing particular to illustrate, of harmonizing with their respective Epistles. Whatever changes were made at the Reformation may be seen by the marginal notes in the middle column. In 1661 the only changes made were in the Gospels for the Holy Week, some of which were shortened by Bishop Cosin ; in the insertion of those for a Sixth Sunday after Epiphany ; and in printing all Gospels and Epistles from the Authorized Version of 1611. instead of from that of 154n. § The Coincidence of Holydays. The Collects, Epistles, and Gospels give the kejniote to the whole of the Services for Holydays ; Lessons, Hymns, and Ritual Colours, all following their lead. There are, how- ever, several days in every year in which two sets of these will offer themselves for use, as, for example, when a Saint's Day falls on a Sunday, and it then becomes necessary to have some rule for determining wliich of the two is to be used, and to what extent the other is to be set aside. As regards the latter point, it may be observed that in the ancient Cliurch of England it was the usual custom to pass over the inferior festival altogether on the day of the superior one, transferring its observance to the next day, or to the next day which was not a festival. It does not appear as if this custom had been continued in modern times ; and if it is not adopted, then tlie Epistle, Gospel, and Lessons for the inferior Holyday are necessarily dropped for that occasion. But tlie day should be ritually noticed by the use of its Collect as a "Memorial" after the Collect of the Holyday whose services are used. In the following Table the principles of the ancient Church of England are so far applied to the Holydays for which Collects, Epistles, and Gospels are provided in the Prayer Book, as to shew which is to be regarded as the superior and which the inferior day when there is such a coincidence or "occurrence" between any two of them ;' — Holyday of which the whole Holyday of wliich the Collect is Service is to be used. to be used as a Memorial. 1st Sunday in Advent. St. Andrew. 4th St. Thomas. St. Stephen. \ Ht. John the Evangelist. f_ Holy Innocents. i Circumcision. J 1st Sunday after Christmas. Epiphany, 2nd Sunday after Christmas. Conversion of St. Paul. ;ird Sunday after Epiphany. / 4lh Sunday aft<.-r Epiphany. Purification. J Septnagesima. j Sexagesinia. \ Quinquagesima. Septungesima. \ Sexagesima, > \ Conversion of St. Paul. (St. Matthias. Quinquagesima. } Ash-Wcdnesday. St. Matthias. :ird, 4th, Dtli, and (Jth Sundays'; in Lent ; Wednesday in Holy ( Week — Saturday in Eastur [ Annunciation. Week, inclusive. ; j 1st Suuday after Easter. ( St. Mark. '( ss. Philip and James. St. Mark. ) 1 lind, 3rd, 4th. and 5th Sundays SS. Philip and James. \ \ after Easter. Ascension Day. ss. Pliilip and James. Whitsun Eve— Trinity Sun- \ day. inclusive. ' ) St. Baniabas. St. Uai-naKis. St. John Baptist. ] St. Peter. St. James. 1 St. Bartholomew. I St. Matthew. > Sundays after Trinity. St. Michael and all Angels. Sr. Luke. SS. Mmon and Jude. All Saints. } 1 Tliia collision of one Holyday with another is known by tlio technical term of an •'Occurrence; " but when the vigil of a festival falls upon a day which is a Holyday,— as, for instance, if the vigil of St. Mark were to fall on ICaster Day,— the term " Concurrence" is used. An elaborate disserta- tion on the suliject may be found in Oavanti Thcs ^icr. Hit. ii. 21-00, Mrrati's ed. Ven. 1"<'2. THE COLLECTS EPISTLES AND GOSPELS TO BE USED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. M Note, that the Collect appointed fur every .Siiuday, or for any Holiday tliat hath a Vigil or Eve, shall be said at the Evening Service next before. THE First Sunday in Advent. « ^. 13. Dom. I.in Adv^itu. Jj. » A.Ti. 1549. c IGrep. Hebd. ii. ante Nat. Domini.] '•Dominica I. Adventus *THE COLLECT. ALMIGHTY God, give us grace that we may -^^^ ca.st away the works of darkness, and put upon us the armour of light, now in tlie time of this mortal life (in which Thy Son Jesus Christ came to visit us in great humility) ; that 'in the last day, when He shall come again in His glorious Majesty to judge both the quick and dead, we may rise to the life immortal, through Him Who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, now and ever. Amen. IT This Collect is to be repeated every day with the other Collects in Advent, until Chri.stmas Eve. Domini. ['BENEDICTIO. OMNIPOTENS Deus vos placato vuitu respi- ciat, et in vos donum Suae benedictionis infundat. Amen. Et qui hos dies incarnatione Unigeniti Sui fecit solemnes a cunctis prjesentis et futurse vitse adversitatibus reddat indemnes. Amen. Ut qui de adventu Eedemptoris nostri secundum carnem devota mente Icetamini, in secundo, cum in maj estate venerit, praemiis Eeternse vitoe ditemini. Amen.] Collects . . . throughout the year] The Rubric at p. Ill may here be repeated, namely, "Note also, Tliat the Collect, Epistle, and Gospel appointed for tlie Sunday sliall serve all tlie week after wliere it is not in this book otherwise ordered. " On tlie custom of daily Celebration of the Holy Eucharist, see the Introduction to tlio Liturgy, beyond. aui/ Holidatj that hnth a Vi'jil or Ere] This applies to all Festivals, since all Festivals liave Eves, tliough some have not Vigils. the Evening Service next be/ore] If the Vigil is kept on Satur- day [p. 118], the Collect is to be said on the Sunday Evening, not on the Saturday Evening, and before the Sunday Collect. u-ilh the other CoUeclft] That is, after them. ADVENT. From the first institution oE the great Festivals of the Church each of them occupied a centra! position in a series of days ; partly for the greater lionour of tlie Festival itself, and partly for the sake of Christian discii)Une. Thus Christmas is preceded by the Sundays and Season of Advent, and fol- lowed by twelve days of continued Christian joy which end with Epiphany. Under its present name the season of Advent is not to be traced further back than the seventh century ; but Collects, Epistles, and Gospels for five Sundays before the Nativity of cur Lord, and for the Wednesdays and Fridays also, are to be found in the ancient Sacramentaries, and in the Comes of St. Jerome. These offer good evidence that the observance of the season was introduced into the C'liurcli at tlie same time with the observance of Christmas : yet there is not, pro- perly speaking, any season of Advent in the Eastern Church, which has always carefully preserved ancient customs intact ; though it observes a Lent before Christmas as well as before Easter. Durandus (a laborious and painstaking writer, always to be respected, tliough not to be implicitly relied upon) writes that St. Peter instituted three w hole weeks to be observed as a special season before Christmas, and so much of the fourth as extended to the Vigil of Christinas, whicli is not part of Advent. [Duraud. vi. 2. ] This was probably a very ancient opinion, but the earliest extant historical evidence respecting Advent is that mentioned above, as contained in the Lection- ary of St. Jerome. Next come two homilies of Maximus, Bisliop of Turin, a.d. 450, which are headed Z)e Adrentu Domini. In the following century are two otlier Sermons of Ca?sarius, Bishop of Aries [501-542] (formerly attributed to St. Augustine, and printed among his works), and in these there are full details respecting the season and its observance. In the latter part of the same century St. Gregory of Tours writes that Perpetuus, one of his predecessors, had ordered tlie observance of three days as fasts in every week, from the Feast of St. Martin to that of Christmas ; and this direction was enforced on the Clergy of France by the Council of Mai;on, held A.D. 581. In the Ambrosian and Mozarabic liturgies Advent Season commences at the same time : and it has also been sometimes known by the name Quadragesima Sancti Martini: from wliich it seems probable that the Western Churches of Europe originally kept six Advent Sundays, as the Eastern still keeps a forty days' fast, beginning on the same day. But the English Church, since the Conquest, at least, has observed four only, although the title of the Sunday preceding the first seems to offer an indication of a fifth in more ancient days. The rule by which Advent is determined defines the first Sunday as that which comes nearest, whether before or after, to St. Andrew's Day ; which is equivalent to saying that it is the first Sunday after November 2Gth. December 3rd is con- sequently the latest day on wliich it can occur. In the Latin and English Churches the Cliristian year com- mences witli the First Sunday in Advent. Such, at least, has been the arrangement of the Collects, Epistles, and Gospels for many centuries, although the ancient Sacramentaries began the year with Christmas Da}', and although the Prayer Book (until the change of stj-le in 1752) contained an express "Note, that the Supputatiou of the year of our Lord in the Church of England beginneth the Five and Twentieth day of March." By either reckoning it is intended to number the times and seasons of the Church by tlie Incarnation : and while the computation from the Annunciation is more correct from a theological and a chronological point of view, that from Advent 246 Cbc first ^unDay in 3Dt)cnt. "THE EPISTLE. *r.om. xiii. 11-U. OWE no man anj- thing, but to love one anotlier : for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this. Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet ; and if there he any other com- mandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neigh- bour : therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. And that, knowing the time, that now it is high Ri^m- " 5. g. IS- an as p. B. l-tisUrn. I^gth Sunday from AVhit- smi Day.l Col. 3. 4-11. fr Iiv these refer- ences tlie verse "Inch ends the Epistle or Gospel has been added : only that which bejpns it bein;4 given in the MS. and the Sealed Books. time to awake out of sleep : for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand ; let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. Let us walk honestly as in the day ; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying. But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof. 'THE GOSPEL. S. Matt. xxi. 1-9. WHEN they drew nigh unto Jerusalem, and were come to Bethphage, unto the mount of Olives, then sent Jesus two disciples, saying unto them, Go into the village over against you, and straightway ye shall find an ass tied, and a colt with her : loose them, and bring them mito Me. And if any man say ought unto you, ye shall say. The Lord hath need of them ; and straightway he will send them. All this wa.s done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet, saying. Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass. And the disciples went, and did as Jesus commanded them ; and brought the ass, and the colt, and put on them their clothes, and they set Him thereon. And a very great multitude spread f 5. g. as p. E. ?!). Mark i. 1-8. Re7/t/tn. Luke2t. =5-38. , , liastern, Luke 14. i-it. ] their garments in the way ; others cut down branches from the trees, and strawed them in the I way. And the midtitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Husauna to the son of David ; Blessed is He that cometh in the Name of the Lord ; Hosanna in the highest. And when He was come into Jei'usalem all the city was moved, saying, Who is this? And the multitude said, This is Jksus the Prophet of Nazareth of Galilee. And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple ; and overthrew the tables of the money-changers, and the seats of them that sold doves ; and said unto them, It is written. My house shall be called the house of prayer ; but ye have made it a den of thieves. and Christmas fits in far better with the vivid system of tlio Church by which she represents to us the life of our Lord year by year. Beginning the year with the Annunciation, we should be reminded by the new birth of Nature of the regene- ration of Human Nature ; beginning it with Advent and Christmas, we have a more keen reminder of that humiliation of God the Son, by wliich the new birth of the world was accomplished. And .is we number our years, not by the .ige of the world, nor by the time during which any earthly sove- reignty has lasted, but by the age of tlie Christian Cluirch and the time during which the Kingdom of Clirist has been established upon earth, calling each " the Year of our Lord,'' or "the Year of Grace ;" so we begin every year with the season when grace first came by our Lord and King, through His Advent in the humility of His Incarnation. In very ancient times the season of Advent was observed as one of special prayer and discipline. As already stated, the Council of Ma9on in its ninth Canon directs the general observance by the Clergy of the Monday, Wednesday, and Friday fast-days, of which traces are found at an earlier period : and tlie Capitulars of Cliarlemagno also speak of a forty days' fast before Christmas. The strict Lenten observ- ance of the season was not, however, general. Amalarius, writing in the ninth century, speaks of it as being kept in that way only by tlie religious, that is, by those who liad adopted an ascetic life in monasteries, or elsewhere : and the principle gener.ally carried out appears to have been that of multiplying solemn services,' and of adopting a greater reserve in the use of lawful indulgences. Such an observance of the season still commends itself to us as one that will form .a fit- tine prefix to the joyous time of Christmas : and one that will also be consistent with that contemplation of our Lord's Second Advent which it is impossible to dissoci.ate from thoughts of His First. In the system of the Church the Advent Season is to the Christmas Season what St. John the Baptist was to the First, and the Christian Ministry is to the Second, Coming of our Lord. § 77ie First Sunday in Advent. Tho four Sundays in Advent set forth, by the Holy 1 Our own Church hnd ftppcial Kptsttcs nnrt Goffpcls for tho TVednesdnys and Frid.iyn in Aet all the angels of God worship Him." Introit. — Unto Thee, Lord, will I lift up my soul ; my ^i)t ^cconD anD CijirD ^unDays in aoucnt. 247 Thk Second Sunday in Advknt. I A.V. 1549- "Dominica II. Advenlus Domini. *THE COLLECT. BLESSED Lord, Who hast caused all holy Scri[)ture3 to be written for our learning ; Grant that we may in such wise hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them, that by patience, and comfort of Thy holy AVord, we may embrace, and ever hold fast the blessed hope of everlasting life, which Thou hast given us in our Saviour Jesus Christ. Amen. ' THE EPISTLE. Rom. xv. 4-18. W HATSOEVER things were written afore- time, were written for our learning ; that we through patience, and comfort of the Scrip- tures, might have hope. Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be like minded one towards another, according to Christ Jesus : that ye may with one mind, and one mouth, glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Wherefore receive ye one another, as Christ also received us, to the glory of God. Now I say, that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers : <• S. Jff. ffi. Kom. ail .IS 1*. B. Jiitslern. Col. 3. And that the Gentiles might glorify God for Ilis mercy ; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to Thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto Thy Name. And again ho saith, llejoice, ye Gentiles, with His people. And again, Praise the Lord, all ye Gentiles, and laud Him, all ye people. And again, Esaias saith, There shall be a root of Jesse, and He that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles, in Him shall the Gentiles trust. Now the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, that ye may abound in hope, through the power of the Holy Ghost. THE GOSPEL. S. Luke xxi. 25-33. AND there shall be signs in the sun, and in -^-J- the moon, and in the stars ; and ui)on the earth distress of nations, with perplexity, the sea and the waves roaring ; men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth : for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. And then shall they see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your ■