IREN^EUS LETTERS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN THE NEW YORK OBSERVER. THE NEW YORK OBSERVER. 1881. COPYRIGHT, 1880, BY NEW YORK OBSERVER. Prest of 8. W. Gunn'g Sow, 14 Beckman Street, Mew York. PS 6 r? 1881 INTRODUCTORY NOTE, BY THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK OBSERVER. IN the year 1837 the signature of IREN^EUS first appeared on the pages of the New York Observer. The writer was then a pastor in the Highlands of the Hudson. In the month of April, 1840, he became one of its editors, and has been writing in it, with brief intervals, every week for more than forty years. He has established such relations with his readers that he has come to regard them as personal friends, and he has received abundant assurance that this feeling is reciprocated. Requests, many and earnest, have been made by our sub scribers for the collection of these letters into a volume. "Travels in Europe and the East," "Switzerland," "The Alhambra and the Kremlin," " Under the Trees " and " Walk ing with God," are the names of books originally published as " Irenaeus Letters " in this paper. But this volume con tains a selection of more familiar, household letters, such as have been specially mentioned by our readers as giving them pleasure, and it is now published in compliance with their repeated requests to have this in this permanent form. IT-; / THE NEW YORK OBSERVER: A NATIONAL, RELIGIOUS, FAMILY NEWSPAPER. NOT SECTIONAL. NOT SECTARIAN. // has two distinct sheets in one : Readily separated so as to form two journals. One filled -with Religious and the other -with Secular Reading, All the news of all Christian Churches of all denominations and from all foreign countries is furnished by correspondents in every part of our own country and in every quarter of the globe. So wide is the range of religious intelligence, of Literature, Science, Art, Commerce and Agriculture, that the reading of this paper is an education to the whole family that receives it. Its editors and sole proprietors are the REV. DRS. S. IREN^US PRIME, E. D. G. PRIME, CHAS. A. STODDARD, AND WENDELL PRIME. Besides these it has four editors of special departments and a large corps of special contributors. Its correspondence from Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Pacific Islands is a valuable feature ; its editorials are fearless and fair ; its selections are made from an extensive reading with taste and discernment, and its Notices and Reviews of Books and Magazines give a correct idea of current literature. TERMS: IfcS-JS (postpaid) payable in advance. SPECIAL OFFER: The New York Observer will send to any OLD SUBSCRIBER who pays his own subscription in advance, one copy of "Irenaus Letters "for each NEW subscriber whose name he also forwards with $3.15 CONTENTS. PACK Adams, Dr., Intercourse with 389 Agatha and her Dish 300 Among the Icebergs 131 Amphitheatres and Theatres 230 Anna Dickinson on Theatres 340 Apostle in Rome 295 Arguing with a Poker and a Hammer 336 Babes in the Woods 113 Bear in Boston 52 Beggar, An Interesting 134 Beggars' Church and the Beggars of Italy 288 Bryant, William Cullen 160 Calling Bad Names 25 Castle of Unspunnen 190 Cemetery beneath a Cemetery 238 Chester Cathedral Service 178 Childhood of Christ 6 Children and the Church 79 Choosing a Minister's Wife 16 Church and a Picture 225 Church and Cloisters of St. Mark 263 Convent on the Sea 235 Country Pastor's Sermon 46 Cowper and Ray Palmer 137 Cox, The late Dr. S. H 394 Doremus, Mrs 49 Doughnation Party 98 Dream of the Year 62 Dresden Pictures . 202 CONTENTS. Eternal City, Why? 276 Evil Eye 105 Fife and the Violin 311 Fine Old English Gentleman 207 Gamblers at Monaco 329 Going to a Glacier 193 Going to Rome 272 Great Exaggerator 153 Green Vaults 197 Habits, especially Bad Habits 102 Henry and Hildebrand 123 His Grandfather's Barn 22 Hold up your Head 127 It's his Way 55 Jews' Quarter in Rome 291 Lance of St. Maurice 215 Lesson from a Sick-room 150 Long-winded Speakers. ... 120 Made without a Maker 333 Manners in Church. 116 Man who had to wait for a Seat in Church 326 Meanest Woman in New York 381 Milk and Water 370 Ministers' Pay in Old Times ., 87 Ministers' Sons 359 Minister who was hung 362 Miseries of being reported in the Newspapers 308 Model Minister 109 Monastery and Convent 186 Morning Adventure in Rome 280 Muhlenberg, The Good Dr 385 Murray, Dr. : Bishop Hughes 90 Music Composer Spoiled 9 My first Sight of Niagara 314 My Vine: my poor Vine! 374 Name above Every Name 141 New England Homes and Graves 30 O Thou of Little Faith 167 Qur Friends in Heaven 344 CONTENTS. 7 PACK Our Windows in Florence 243 Pastor and Friend 59 Pleasant Recollections 13 Sabbath among the Hills 69 Sabbath in Cambridge, England 181 San Miniato and Vallombrosa 249 Santa Croce and the Inquisition in Florence 255 Service of Song 73 Shakers of Canterbury 82 Spring's Prediction, Dr 66 Story and the Church of St. Cecilia. 284 Studies in Torture Rooms 211 Summer Board and Summer Boarders 40 Sunday Evening Supper 304 Taxing a Child's Brain 36 Ten Days on the Ship 173 That Dreadful Boy i Through the Tyrol 220 Torturing the Little Ones 366 Two Hours in Court 94 Two Pictures: Ideal, but Real 170 Warriors on War 164 Week in the White House 145 When it Rains, let it Rain 157 When not to Laugh 348 White and Yellow Meeting-Houses 377 White Mountain Notch 321 With a Pirate in his Cell 351 Woman's View of Crime 355 IREN^US LETTERS. THAT DREADFUL BOY. HE was going from Boston to Old Orchard with his mother. I was sorry to be in the same car with them. His mother seemed to exist only to be worried by this uneasy, distressing boy. He had only one fault he was perfectly insufferable. If I say he was "an unlicked cub" I shall offend your ears. Lick is an old English word that means either to lap or to strike. Shakespeare uses rinlicked as applied to the cub of a bear ; there was a notion that the whelp was at first a form less thing that had to be " licked into shape" by the mother's tongue. So it came to pass that the vulgar expression, "an unlicked cub," was fittingly applied to a boy whose mother never gave him the culture essential to make him present able, or even tolerable, in the society of well-behaved people. The two meanings of the word are not very diverse. This boy had never been licked into shape. He needed licking. I use the word in its two senses. And the use, if not elegant, is intelligible and expressive, perhaps graphic also. The mother besought him to be still for a moment, but the moment of stillness never came. He wanted something to eat, got it; to drink, and he kept a steady trot through the car ; the anxious mother prayed him not to go to the plat form, not to put his head out of the window, not to climb over the seats ; all in vain. She might as well have en treated the engine. In travelling, one is often haunted by people from whom he tries to fly. He meets them at the galleries or the dinner- 2 1REN&US LETTERS. table. The dreadful boy and his mother were in the parlor of the seaside hotel where I had engaged my lodgings. In half a day this dreadful boy was the pest and nuisance of the piazza, the parlors and the halls. His intellectual mother, coddling and coaxing him, sought to win him into the ways of decency and peace, but he rejoiced in showing he was not tied to his mother. The more she reasoned the more he rioted in his liberty. " I would drown the little plague if I could catch him in the water," said a crusty savage from New York City ; " the ill-mannered cur minds nobody and fears nobody." One evening we were seated in the parlor, in little groups, conversing. Into the room rushed the dreadful boy pursued by another whom he had hit, and both were screaming in play at the top of their voices. As he was passing me I seized him by the arm with a grip that meant business, and said : " Here, my boy, we have stood this thing long enough : it has come to an end." An awful silence filled the room ; his mother, frightened, sat pale, and not far away, while I held the culprit and pursued the lecture " If you do not know how to behave in company, let me tell you the parlor is no place for such romps as we have suffered from you ; go out of doors and stay out for such games, and when you come in here, sit down and be quiet." He wriggled to get away, but I led him to the door and left him on the outside. As I had not been introduced to his mother, I was not sup posed to know whose boy it was, and therefore made no apologies for this summary discipline of somebody else's child. The next day I was sitting on the beach under a sun um brella, when a party of ladies and the dreadful boy hove in sight, and sought seats near me. I offered my seat to the mother, but she found one at hand, thanked me, and said : " I am under great obligation to you, sir, for taking my boy in hand last evening." " It is rather in my place," I made answer, " to apologize for laying hands on the child of another: but I saw he was regardless of authority, and thought to give him a lesson." THAT DREADFUL BOY. 3 "Thanks: but I would like to tell you of him: he is a dear child, an only child, and his father, often and long away from home on business, has left his education and care to me entirely. I have the impression that the strongest of all influences is love, and that none is so strong as a mother's love : I never speak to him but in tones and words of affec tion: I never deny him any indulgence he asks: I let him have his own way and never punish him, lest he should be offended with me. I wish that he may not have any thoughts of his mother but those of kindness, gentleness and love. Your sudden and decided measure last night startled me, but its effect on the child was remarkable. He has not yet recovered, and this morning he spoke to me of it, as if a new sensation had been awakened. Will you tell me frankly what your opinion is of the probable result of the system which I am pursuing?" " It is not becoming in a stranger," I said, " to speak plainly in regard to the domestic management of another, and I hope you will excuse me from expressing an opinion which it would not be pleasant for you to hear." " But I want to hear it ; the good of my child is the dear est object in this world : I have nothing else to live for, but it seems to me that the more I love him the less he cares for me or my wishes, the more unruly and troublesome he be comes. Your decided dealing with him has frightened me in regard to my course of training." " Rather you should say your ' want of training him.' You do not read correctly the words of the wise man, ' Train up a child,' etc. You are letting him grow up without training, and my fear is that he will be hung " "Hung! hung! what do you mean ?" " Only this, that you are allowing him now to be a lawless, selfish, domineering, disagreeable boy: he has his own way always : he tramples on your wishes now, and will tread on your heart soon and love to do it : such boys are bad at home and worse out of doors : growing up ungoverned, he will defy authority, be hated by his companions, get into trouble, become turbulent, riotous, perhaps an outlaw, and 4 IREN&US LETTERS. will come to some bad end, I fear a rope's end. This plain talk offends you, I perceive." " No, it does not : I am thinking, but I am not offended. I asked your candid opinion and have received it, and it has made me anxious lest I have already done an irreparable injury to the dear child. Do you believe in the corporal punishment of children ?" " It is sometimes a duty. You may restrain the wayward ness of some children without actually whipping them, and if you can, by all means do so. But the first duty of a child is to obey its parents. Your boy never obeyed you since he was born !" " True, very true : he has always had his own way." " Yes, and is therefore never happy : he would cry for the moon, and fret because he cannot have it. He is no comfort to you, and is a torment to all about him. If you would make him happy, you will make him mind : and especially to obey his mother. I do not believe that you will succeed." " Pray, why not, sir ?" " Because, madam, you have ' views ' that are opposed to these. You believe only in moral suasion, in the largest lib erty, and you cannot break away from your opinions and surroundings and persistently, steadily and faithfully pursue a new line of life with that boy." " But I will try." " God help you, madam, and you will need his help, for you have a long struggle before you. But the prize is worth it, and I wish you success with all my heart. Your child will love you ten times more if you teach him to respect you : he will not love you while you let him defy and despise your authority as he does now. Soon he will love you, and love to obey you, and then he is saved. Solomon was a wise man, and spoke divine wisdom when he said, ' He that spareth the rod hateth his son, but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.' " The madam had a smile of contempt on her face, and said, " I don't think much of Solomon." " Probably not," I replied. " Did you ever read the Apoc- THAT DREADFUL BOY. 5 rypha ? Those Oriental writings are not inspired, so you need not be afraid of them" she laughed "and I will give you the sage advice of the Son of Sirach: 'Indulge thy child and he shall make thee afraid : humor him and he will bring thee to heaviness. Bow down his neck while he is young, and beat him on the sides while he is a child, lest he wax stubborn and be disobedient unto thee, and so bring sorrow upon thy heart.' Which means teach him to obey, or he will govern you and break your heart." The mother was silent a moment, and then spoke with quivering lips : " Did you ever read Patmore's lines, ' My Little Son ' ? No ? Well, I will say them, for they are on my heart : ' My little son, who looked from thoughtful eyes, And moved and spoke in quiet grown-up wise, Having my law the seventh time disobey'd, I struck him and dismiss'd With hard words and unkiss'd, His mother, who was patient, being dead. Then, fearing lest his grief should hinder sleep, I visited his bed, But found him slumbering deep, With darkened eyelids, and their lashes yet From his late sobbing wet. And I, with moan, Kissing away his tears, left others of my own ; For, on a table drawn beside his head, He had put, within his reach, A box of counters and a red-veined stone, A piece of glass abraded by the beach, And six or seven shells, A bottle with bluebells, And two French copper coins ranged there with careful art, To comfort his sad heart. So, when that night I pray'd To God, I wept and said : Ah, when at last we lie with tranced breath, Not vexing thee in death, And thou rememberest of what toys We made our joys, How weakly understood Thy great commanded good, 6 IREN&US LETTERS. Then, fatherly not less Than I whom thou hast moulded from the clay, Thou'lt leave thy wrath and say, '"I will be sorry for their childishness." ' " " Thank you," I said, as she paused her eyes filled with tears " thank you : no child should be ' struck in anger and dismissed with hard words.' Punishment in love and justice breaks no child's heart : that father was all wrong." " I see it," she answered, " and I begin to feel it also." We exchanged cards, and I hope to hear of the dreadful boy again. THE CHILDHOOD OF CHRIST. When I was in Nazareth, the child-life of Jesus excited emotions of a character not difficult to recall, but very hard to relate. I was led to the shop where tradition says that Joseph wrought at his trade of a carpenter. And now I have on the wall before me an exquisite engraving of the man at his work, while a lovely boy is looking on. The light divine is playing on the child's brow. Nazareth is in a valley, and the hills surround it like the rim of a basin. On this ridge, perhaps, the child Christ had often walked, and from it looked away to the hills now famous and sacred in the story of his life and death, and in the history that was the prophecy of his coming. Carmel stretches away to the sea on the right. The dome of Mount Tabor salutes the vault of heaven on the left. Gilboa and the lesser Hermon remind us of Saul and Jonathan, and the sweet singer of Israel. We look out on the plain of Esdraelon, the wide battle-field of old, and the field of mira cles of mercy as well. In the distance are places where the Saviour, in the days of his ministry, went about doing good ; and the region finally sanctified by his death and ascension to the glory that was his before the world was. THE CHILDHOOD OF CHRIST. 7 It requires no superstition to invest such a walk with holy interest. The spot is not marked by great events to which the world makes pilgrimage. It is not certain that the child Jesus ever stood in the place where I was standing when I looked down upon Nazareth, and off toward Mount Moriah, and the City of the Great King ! But the mystery of the Incarnation and Youth of the Son of God was invested with fresh beauty and power as I wondered what were the emo tions of the boy in those days of his childhood, before he took on his shoulders the burden which he came to bear. He knew all that was before him ! When he was an infant on his mother's neck, she was conscious of the mighty secret that he was the Son of God, and she alone of all the daughters or sons of men knew that truth : even then, in the tender years of his infancy, the cross and the nails and the spear were in his heart, as afterwards on Calvary. She, too, had been told that the sword would pierce through her own soul, and thus the sorrows of the infant Jesus were shared in the sympathy of his mother. He was strong in spirit when yet in the dew of his youth. He was filled with wisdom. And the grace of God was upon him. Wonderful must have been the boyhood thus endowed. What the thoughts of his mother were in those days we know not, but she kept all his strange sayings in her heart, and linked them with the awful mystery of his advent by a way known only to herself and the Spirit of the Lord. He was only twelve years old when he went up with his parents to Jerusalem, and there stood before the teachers in the temple, and taught them so that they were astonished at his understanding, and his answers to the questions which they proposed to the precocious and inquisitive lad. It was more marvellous then than it would be now for a child to take such a place before a college of professors. The rever ence for age and wisdom and authority is much less now than in those days, and the doctors of divinity might well have been surprised at the courage no less than the learning 8 IREN&US LETTERS. of a child of twelve, who could sit in their presence and hold his own in extemporaneous debate. " Don't you know that I must be about my Father's busi ness?" were the strange words he uttered when his mother found him, after three days' search. It is very plain that Mary, the blessed Mother of Jesus, whom millions of igno rant people now worship with prayers invoking her protec tion, is no more able to take care of us than any other mother is, for she could not keep watch of her own child on the journey from Jerusalem to Nazareth, and it took her three days to find him. I am sure that she is no more able to help and save than my mother is, and it is just as well to pray to one as the other. And with what filial respect and confidence the child Jesus met his mother's call, and turned away from the congenial company of those men of learning ! He must go back to Nazareth, to the carpenter's shop and the daily toil. He might be a Rabbi among Rabbis. But his time had not yet come. He went home and was obedient unto his parents. He was a good boy. That is saying much for him. And it is a wonderful fact that a life of Christ, written on one sheet like this, has space for the record that he obeyed his mother ! He was the Saviour of Men, the Lord of Glory, the Man of Sorrows, the Prince of Peace. He came to seek and save the lost, and his life of work for a world is full of incident, activity and tragedy, but his biographer begins by telling us that he was a child who was subject to his parents. I find in that simple statement a great truth for all time, all lands, all parents and all children. I thought of it as I stood on the hill over Nazareth, and looked off into the western sky where the sun was going down to shine on an other dear and sacred home. And when with my friend now in heaven, the missionary Calhoun, I went to bed in the Convent that night, and talked with him of those we loved across the sea, my mind was filled with thoughts of the childhood of Jesus when he was subject to his parents. The holy child Jesus ! At this season of the year, and on this day of all the days in the year, I would write to the parents and the children who read these lines, and commend A MUSIC-COMPOSER SPOILED. 9 to them the life of the Holy Child Jesus: of Jesus when he was a child. Even then he was filled with wisdom and grace, and he grew in favor with God and man as he in creased in stature, but the crown of his childhood was obe dience to his parents. The happiest child in the world is one who takes delight in doing what is well pleasing to God and its parents. Out of that vale of Nazareth has gone a child whose life and death have been the light and joy and will yet be the salvation of the world. To be like that Child is heaven be gun. To be like him here is to be with him, in his Father's house, forever. A MUSIC-COMPOSER SPOILED. THE FATE OF POOR RICHARD LEARNING TO SING. When I was a lad of a dozen years, we had a singing school in the congregation of the "Old White Meeting House." No such schools are in these days, in this part of the country. It was held once a week, in the big ball-room of the tavern, across the green, opposite the church. From all the region, miles around, the young men and maidens came by scores, and were trained to sing the tunes that were used on the Sabbath day. The school was a great winter treat, and the intermission in the middle of the evening was particularly enjoyed and improved. Of one of the boys who attended this school you will now be told, but to spare his feelings, especially his modesty, his name will be carefully concealed. Sufficient has been his mortification, as you are to learn, and I remember the remark of ^Eneas to Dido, when she asked him to tell the story of his sufferings : "What you, O Queen, command me to relate, Renews the sad remembrance of my fate." Therefore I shall not mention his real name, but speak of him as Richard. 16 IREN&US LETTERS. Richard was one of the minister's sons, and very ambitious to be a singer. He had a passion for music, as was apparent from the vigor with which he beat the drum and blew the horn in those childish plays which made the welkin ring and annoyed the neighbors. When a teacher from Connecticut came there, and got up a singing school, Richard entered it with the fire of genius kindling in his eye, and his ear open to the expected sounds. The primary rules of the science and art of music being readily mastered, and easy tunes rehearsed till they were quite familiar, he seized the pen of the composer, and with rapid strokes produced one and then another tune of his own, with judicious and discriminating indications on the staff with Cleff and Slurs, Hold, Staccato, Swell (much of that), Piano and Forte and Mezzo, even now and then Con Spirito, Andante, Ad Libitum, etc. These tunes the teacher examined, played them on the bass viol, and sang them with fitting words. They passed that dread ordeal, and were pronounced remarkably well done for a child. Alas, that this same teacher should prove the ruin of this incipient Mozart or Handel ! The winter rapidly slid along. The school flourished grandly. A choir of a hun dred was ready to fill the gallery and shake the pillars of the church. As the young Richard was singing at the top of his voice, and doubtless making obvious discord, the master, passing near him, was provoked, and stopping in the midst of the tune, and in sudden silence, said impatiently and severely, " You have too many corners to your throat to learn to sing !" The cruel man might better have broken his viol over the boy's head. As it was, he broke the boy's heart. Down went his aspirations, and from that hour to this he has never tried to learn a line of music, and has long since ceased to know one tune from another. Then and there a sense of discouragement took hold on him and never let him up. Whatever else he could do and did, he made no further prog ress in the culture of his voice or the art of composing music ! Yet he never ceased to love it, and never ceased to regret that he did not despise the rebuke, and give the lie to the prophet, by overmastering the difficulties, rounding the A MUSIC-COMPOSER SPOILED. II corners of his throat, and learning to sing. Thirty years after this blow fell on him he tvas relating his fate to Mr. Thomas Hastings, the famous teacher and composer of sacred music. That excellent man, of blessed memory, said to him on hearing his story : " Sing with me the eight notes." He did so to the best of his ability. " There is no reason in the world," said this master, "why you should not be a good singer. If you will begin now, you will succeed beyond all doubt." But the man would not undertake what the boy had abandoned as a hopeless task. The boy was father of the man. Mr. Hastings said : " Every one may learn to sing : not one in a thousand has any natural deficiency to prevent him from being a fair singer." But Richard was too old a bird to begin. He could not be flattered into a fresh exposure of those fatal corners. The fate of this ambitious youth, and the sad loss the world has suffered by the early clipping of his musical wings, may be utilized in a note of warning to parents and teachers. There is a bent, a trend, a tendency in the nature of children, which should be taken into account in the culture of their minds and the choice of a pursuit in life. Some times it should be discouraged, for it does not always point to usefulness, honor and happiness. Just as the twig, etc. And in early years, even a bad tendency may be repressed or eradicated, which, left unchecked, will become a resistless flood, an ungovernable passion, a fatal power. But this natural force, inclination or propensity, when rightly guided, will be clear gain in the development of character, making a grand success. It is better in the training of the young to rely more on cautious encouragement, than rough reproof and constant censure or fault-finding. The race is weary enough, and the toil up hill is hard enough, to justify all the help that parent and teacher can afford. Repression and scolding only 12 IRENMUS LETTERS. irritate the soul, without adding to its power. Often the brain is confused by a harsh word, and the mind is diverted from the point, when a smile and kindly remark would be a ray of sunlight guiding to the true answer. One of the marvels of human nature is that loving parents often abuse their children under a mistaken sense of duty. But there is something for every one to do in this world, and when a musician is spoiled, it is not certain that he does not turn out to be something better. " There's a Divinity that shapes our ends." The great difference in the men We meet is energy or the want of it. Given fair natural powers, the average, then put on the steam, and the man will go. With virtue at the helm, the worker will win usefulness and bread, and with them the chief end of man. This is rather a dull ending of poor Richard's musical career. He did not go singing his way through the world. He never learned to distinguish one tune by its name. But no waters could quench the music in his soul. He heard it in the spheres when " in solemn silence all move round this dark terrestrial ball." He listened to it among the pine trees through which the meadow brook wound its way. In the sounding ocean and the shells he listened to the mystery and melody of the sea. Even the growth of the plants, as he put his ear to the sod, made music. And at home and in far cities he heard the great masters of voice and instrument, Braham and Jenny Lind, the two greatest human voices of the century, and all the lyric songsters that have swept the heart and harp chords of the age: he felt the passion strains in the Sistine chapel, rose in rapture on the organ tones at Frieburg, and wept in a delirium of emotion under the choir of St. Roch . he thought with the wisest of men to get him " men singers and women singers," and perhaps has found as exquisite delight in the concord of sweet sounds as any untutored mind can enjoy, but he has never ceased to regret that his first music teacher, that peripatetic pedagogue from Connecticut, said to him, in the hearing of a hundred, " You have too many corners to your throat to learn to sing." PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS. tj PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS OF A ROMAN CATHOLIC PASTOR AND FRIEND. This, as I learn by the daily papers, is the anniversary of the death of Rev. Dr. Cummings, the pastor of St. Stephen's Roman Catholic Church in 28th Street in this city. His church was, and is, distinguished for its music, which draws throngs to its courts. The style of the music is more artistic than we have in our most fashionable Protestant churches, but it is attractive in the highest degree. He died thirteen years ago to-day, and, as on the return of each anniversary, a solemn high mass of requiem was celebrated in the church of his affection. He was a remarkable man, a companion able, cultivated scholar and gentleman. My recollections of him are refreshing, and they come to me this evening so cheerily that I must ask you to share them with me. I was indebted to a " mutual friend," Mr. W. A. Seaver, formerly an editor, and now the worthy President of the Adriatic Fire Insurance Company, for my first acquaintance with Dr. Cummings. We were Mr. Seaver's guests at din ner. A few moments after first speaking with him, for the grasp of his warm hand assured me he was ready for a cheer ful word, I said to him : " Dr. Cummings, I take this, the first opportunity of meet ing you, to beg your pardon for breaking open a letter of yours at my office." " Ah," said he, " how was that, I have forgotten it?" " Yes, a letter came to us with your name on it, and as one of our editors bore the same name as yours, he supposed it was for him and broke the seal. But finding it was writ ten in Latin and came from Rome, we concluded it must be for some one else, and we returned it to the post office." " Oh, yes," he replied, " I remember now, it was an Indul gence we had sent for from the Pope, but probably you 14 IREN^EUS LETTERS. needed it at your office more than we did, and so it went to you !" We were soon at the table, and it proved to be one of the early days of Lent. Our host made an apology, and said to Dr. Cummings : " Perhaps, as it is Lent, you abstain from meat?" " Oh, no, it's meet, meet, meetzVz^ all the time," he said ; " and without meat we should be unequal to the duties of the season." In conversing with me on the subject of newspaper-mak ing, and especially the conflicts of the religious press, he re ferred humorously to his own experience when he was a young man, and in the family of Bishop Hughes. He said : "The Bishop was at that time running a newspaper him self, and I was his assistant ; he would sometimes come in when hard up for copy, and throwing down the New York Observer before me, would say, ' there, take that, and pitch in.' " To which, I " And you always did as you were told, I be lieve." Speaking of the power of music in church, he said to me : " I will undertake to fill any one of your churches to over flowing every Sunday if you will let me provide the music." "Your music," I replied, "will not suit the taste of our people, who do not fancy the style of St. Stephen's." " But it shall be purely Protestant and Presbyterian : such music as you delight in ; adapted to your forms of worship and the wants of your people. Our music would drive away your congregations ; but music delights, and will always draw the crowd. I am very sure that your churches do not appreciate its value as a means of bringing the multitude to the house of God." " We spend money enough on it," I said ; " often as much on the choir as on the pulpit." " Very true, but you pay for that kind of music that does not accord with your service it does not address itself to PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS. 15 the sentiment, the sensibility, the emotional nature ; it is often an approach to the opera without reaching it so that it is neither the one thing nor the other. Ours is artistic, in harmony with our ritual, addressing the imagination through the senses ; you appeal to the intellect and the heart, and need a music to match your services." These are a few only of the words we exchanged, but we met not long afterwards at his own table, in his own house. Fifteen or twenty gentlemen sat down ; all but four were priests or eminent laymen of the Romish Church. Dr. Cum- mings, at the head of the table, had two of us Protestants on one hand, and two on the other. The Austrian Consul presided at the other end of the long table. After we were seated, our host, looking along the rows of guests, remarked with great glee, " Now we have these Protestants, we'll roast them." I returned his smiles and said, " I thought we all belonged to the same sect." " And which ?" exclaimed some one. "The Society of Friends," said I, and they gave me a cheer along the line, and did not try to roast a Protestant. It was a memorable dinner. I made the acquaintance of several men of learning, travel and genius, whose friendship I prized. Among the books lying around was a volume of epitaphs composed by Dr. Cummings. He told me that his people constantly came to him for lines to put on the grave stones of their children and friends, and he was obliged to make a book of them, so that they could take what pleased them. He gave me a copy, and I made a commendatory notice of it in the New York Observer. He remarked after wards, to a friend of mine, that he did not suppose it possi ble for a Protestant to speak so kindly of a Catholic produc tion. As the epitaphs were the expression of human sym pathy and love, the most of them were such as come from and to every aching heart. And by and by it came his time to die. He was in the prime and vigor of life when disease overtook him, and with slow approaches wore his life away. His constitu- 1 6 IREN&US LETTERS. tional cheerfulness never failed him. I think an invitation he gave to our friend, Mr. Seaver, has no example in the speech of dying men of ancient or modern times. Socrates conversed with his friends serenely. Philosophy and religion have both made death-beds cheerful. I have spoken of Dr. Cummings' love of music and its exquisite culture at St. Stephen's. It was his pride and joy; and one who has no music in his soul cannot understand his dying words. Mr. Seaver was in the habit of seeing him almost daily, and each visit was now apparently to be the last. One day, as the end was very near and the two friends were parting, the dying said to the living, "Come to the funeral, the music will be splendid." And so it was ; and on each return of his death-day, January the 4th, the arches of St. Stephen's become anthems, and its walls are vocal with song, in memory of the departed pastor, an accomplished gentleman and genial friend. CHOOSING A MINISTER'S WIFE. A great innovation is proposed, and the beginning of a new Reformation dawns on the world ! Whether the people should choose their own pastors, or not, has been a vexed question in the Church through the ages. In the Papal Church the parish takes the pastor sent. In the Church of England the pastorate is a property which the owner bestows on the minister he is pleased to name. Patrons have only very lately ceased to appoint pastors in Scotland. The Methodist Bishop in this country saith to one minister go, and he goeth, and the people accept the gift. When the Pope set up to be infallible, a number of priests and people in Europe were unable to swallow the absurdity, and went off by themselves. They like to be called OLD Catholics, because they hold to the faith as it was before CHOOSING A MINISTER'S WIFE. 17 the modern heresy broke out. They have gradually intro duced changes into their church order, and in the direction of greater liberality and conformity to the teaching of Holy Scripture. " Forbidding to marry" is one of the marks of an apostate Church. Only a Church that had set itself up against the express will of God would command its ministers to trample on the holy ordinance of marriage, and make a virtue of celibacy. This the Church of Rome has done, and by this wicked law it has made itself, as the Rev. J. B. Brown of London says, " worse than the world it ought to save." The reformers who are now seeking to build up a new reformation in the heart of Europe have made an onset upon this rule of clerical celibacy. They have had a Synod in which the subject was discussed long and learnedly, and so strong is prejudice, and so bound are they to the traditions of their Church, it was with the greatest difficulty they could be brought to release themselves from the cruel yoke. And when at last it was carried that priests might marry, it was coupled with a strange provision that we, enjoying the liberty of those whom Christ makes free, are not able easily to un derstand. They resolved in Synod to permit priests to marry, but it was required that " the wife shall be acceptable to the con gregation and to the Bishop, and shall be approved by them." It would be a curious canvass in a country congregation, or a city one either, when the sense of the people was taken on the acceptability of the lady whom the pastor proposes to make his wife. If she were a member of the flock there never would be agreement. If she were not a member how would they ascertain her qualities? A preacher can come on trial, or a committee can go and hear him, see him, weigh and measure him, and report the result to the congregation. But now just suppose a committee of ladies is sent from New Jersey to ascertain the merits of the lady in Vermont whom their pastor wishes to marry. They can talk with her, and ask the neighbors what manner of woman she is, and in spect her school diploma and read some of her old compo sitions, and get her photograph, but after all it is precious 1 8 I REN & US LETTERS. little they will be able to report as to her ability to " keep house" for the minister, or to get up a church fair, or to eke out a poor salary, that is rather diminished than increased as the number of backs to be clothed and mouths to be fed is quadrupled. And then the question comes up if the people or the bishop ought to meddle in the matter. What business of theirs is it? If the pastor and his wife are mutually satis fied, is it the right or duty of anybody else to interfere ? But it is one of the peculiarities of our church life, espe cially in the rural village or district, that the young wife of the pastor is claimed as a part of the church property, to be talked about, criticised, instructed, sat upon, dissected and pulled to pieces, at the sweet will of the congregation. When the pastor has brought to his people a wife whom God has en dowed with gifts to be a wise and useful leader in the work of the church, it will be her joy to use her gifts, and to be much in the service. But she may be better fitted for a " keeper at home ;" to make the house the abode of order and peace and health, and the solace, inspirer and helpmeet for her husband. Thus she may be a greater blessing to the people than one who is always " on the go." Some wives combine the two in one, and some are neither. The Lord did not ordain wives for his disciples. We are told that a bishop must have one wife, not that he must have none, nor two. And we are not instructed as to the qualities of a minister's wife, as we are in regard to his own qualifications. Happy is that people whose pastor is blessed with a pru dent wife, because he is blessed in her. But she is not the people's wife. She is not called by them. They were not al lowed a voice in her selection. She has no salary. But she delights in the ministry of the saints. She is a pattern in her own house, and accord ing to the measure of her strength she goes about doing good. But it is a grand mistake to suppose that she is not the very best wife a pastor can have who makes his house what it should be. Did you ever think of the worry, the wear and tear, of that minister who has to look alter his house and CHOOSING A MINISTER'S WlfiE. 19 parish too ? And of the peace and power oi that preacher who can give himself wholly to the work of the ministry be cause his wife takes joyfully the burden of domestic life upon her tender hands ? A lawyer, now worth a large property, lost his wife a few days ago. Before she was buried 1 called in sympathy with him, and he began at once to tell me how he began his prac tice with no money and no friend but the poor girl who loved him, and had for thirty years managed all his domestic affairs without his giving them a thought. Business, wealth, friends, children were added, and his wife had been the stew ard while he had attended to the work in the world. Far more than a lawyer does a pastor need a wife like that. I do not believe the congregation, nor a bishop, nor a town meeting, could pick out a wife for anybody. And when we remember that the first and highest of all thingsjx> be thought of in the marriage relation is mutual affection, and without it religion, sense and beauty are not enough, it is ridiculous to talk about the congregation having a voice in the choice of a wife for the pastor. It does not speak very well for the Old Catholics that they are spending their time in such matters as this, when the weightier matters of the gospel are at stake. But they are improving. It was something to agree to get married. Other improvements will follow. Rome was not built in a day, and Rome will not be destroyed in a day. To a minister's wife I wrote, to comfort her, these words : TO A MINISTER'S WIFE. 1 have read your letter with serious attention. You ex press a wish that Paul had written an epistle to Mrs. Tim othy, and as he did not, you ask me to supply his lack of service. Thank you, but I must be excused. I couldn't think of supplementing that distinguished letter writer. But the fact that he did not write to her, nor to the wives of ministers as a class, is very significant. You say that you are expected and required to be the 20 IREN&US LETTERS. bearer of a large part of the burdens of the female work in the church : to superintend ilie societies, to lead the ladies' meetings, to visit the sick, to receive constant applications for directions to the women of the flock, and in general to see to it that the "female department" of your husband's pastoral charge is kept in vigorous repair and running order. I was quite amused (pardon me for being amused by any thing that gave you distress) by your account of the call which Mrs. Alltalk made upon you, and with her remark that your first duty is to the church, and your spare time may be devoted to your children and the house. You ask me if you were right in saying that you " married your husband and not the church," and that " your children, not your neigh bors, were the gift of God to you." Yes, madam, you were right : just right. And if you re plied to her with even more spirit than your meek words imply, I think you served her right. And what you failed to say, I will say for you, thus : The temptation and strong desire of every pastor's wife prompt her to do all she can to help him in his work, to serve the church and please the people. She is, usually, a woman of education, sense, and force, and by her position is readily put at the head of things without giving offence to any one; whereas, if Mrs. Alltalk or Mrs. Fidget is made the leader, half the women in the parish are put out because they were not put in. As the pastor is the best taught man, so his wife is apt to be the best qualified woman to teach, lead, guide and quicken. So, trusts are easily laid upon her, and her temptation is to accept them to the extent of her strength ; yes, and beyond her strength. But her relations to the pastor and to the church, and to Christ its head, are not such as to require any service from her that is incompat ible with fidelity to the nearer and more sacred trust of hus band and household. HOME is the church to which she was called, in which she was ordained and installed, to which she is to minister with her whole heart and soul, and for which she will be called to as strict an account as her husband will be for the service he has rendered in the pulpit. When the CHOOSING A MINISTER'S WIFE. 21 younger class of married women are taught in the Bible, they are told ' to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.' This counsel and these commands are quite as pointedly addressed to the wives of ministers, as to the wives of merchants, farmers or mechanics. And if you ask " How am I to do all this, and what women of the church want me to do," I answer that " duties never come into conflict with each other." If you cannot be a keeper at home and a visitor of the sick in the parish, then your duty is to stay at home ; and to do only so much visiting as your domestic affairs, care of children and the house, will permit. Do not send Mrs. Alltalk or Mrs. Fidget, in your place, to see the sick. They will do more harm than good. But the pastor and the deacons, and the neighbors, will see that the sick are cared for, while you mind the little ones who are dependent upon you for daily care. And as to the sewing circles, and benevolent societies, and Sunday-schools, and all that kind of good works, which every working church abounds in, you should not feel any responsibility which is not shared equally by all the ladies of the congregation. You will feel more. Nothing that I can say will convince you that you are in no sense called or set apart as a pas- toress. But you are not. You are the pastor's wife, not the female pastor. You took no vows upon you to serve the church ; you promised to be faithful to your husband. The Bible does not bid you teach, or to go visiting, or to manage the sewing societies ; but it does bid you to see to your own house, and to be a helpmeet for him who is the servant of the church. Comfort yourself then, madam, with these words. In the circle of which you are the centre, the light and the soul, you will work out the mission unto which you were sent, by Him who said to the disciples, "Go into all the world." Your ministry is to one of those disciples and the little dis ciples that are around your feet. I am glad to know that you value the honor God shows you in putting you into 2 2 IRENSE 75 " LE TTERS. such a ministry. It is the sweet gospel of love, of conjugal and maternal love, recognized of the Saviour when, on the cross, he turned his dying eye upon his own mother and said, " Behold thy son." John was to go with the gospel to the churches : to Patmos in exile : to the death of martyr dom : but the woman was to go to his house. God has made everything beautiful in its time and place. His order is perfect. And when it is allowed to work itself out, the result is perfect : perfect peace, harmony, effi ciency and love. Therefore, be of good cheer. Be faithful in a few things, and the many things will be cared for of Him who careth for us. And when Mrs. Alltalk calls again to sting you with her impertinence, and to make you feel miserable because you cannot be in three places at one time, ask her to read this letter while you are getting the chil dren's supper ready. HIS GRANDFATHER'S BARN. You may have heard, of the " Old White Meeting House." It was in Cambridge, Washington county, N. Y. Every body in that region of country knew it, and the " Corners" on which it stood were famous as the scene of town meet ings, general trainings, and travelling shows. Some fifty years ago the Rev. William Lusk was settled as pastor of that church. He was about 28 years old. His face, that in dicated intellect and force, was marvellous for its classic beauty, and, while he was preaching, it lighted up with a smile and radiance that, to my youthful fancy, was the face of an angel. I am quite sure that no preacher ever ap peared to me more seraphic than William Lusk when, on the wings of holy passion and thought, he soared among the lofty truths of the gospel: His sermons were written out with great care and rhetorical beauty. They were delivered with energy and without mannerism, but with a naturalness that was unusual in the pulpit of that day. The people were HIS GRANDFATHERS BARN. 23 delighted with him. A great revival of religion was enjoyed. More than one hundred persons were received into the church on one communion Sabbath. In a rural congrega tion, or any other, such a large accession was remarkable. He had come to Cambridge from a place in Massachusetts, where, he said, there was no need of his staying, for all the people were converted. It looked as though all the people in Cambridge would be converted also. But the Old White Meeting House was -very old. How old I cannot say. Few, if any, then living saw its timbers laid. It was very shaky now. Inside it had never been painted. The pews were square, so that half the people sat with their backs to the preacher. The windows were loose and rattled, and the bleak winds of winter rushed in at many a chink, and the one stove in the centre aisle roasted those near it, but served only to rarify the air a little, so that the outside winds drove in the more furiously. The winters were very severe in that part of the country. We often had the mercury twenty below zero, and even thirty was not unknown. This antiquated and dilapidated house was a sore trial to the young and eloquent pastor. Much did he meditate upon the ways and means to get a better. Perhaps he took coun sel of Sidney Wells, George W. Jermain, Deacon Crocker, or others. More likely he did not, for he was apt to take his own way, and keep it. But the fire burned within him, and all the more fiercely as the winter became more severe. At last it broke out. It was a terribly cold day. The farmers had come to church in their sleighs, which were housed under the long shed in the rear of the church ; horses were carefully done up in blankets; the women had their foot-stoves filled with hot coals, over which they toasted their toes : the men were wrapped in their overcoats, and were cold. The pastor stood in the pulpit and shivered. He looked down upon the people and then around upon the walls of the house as if he had never seen them before, and after a silence that led the congregation to wonder what was coming, he remarked : "My grandfather has a barn" the people were startled in 24 IRENsEUS LETTERS. their seats at the announcement of a fact so very probable indeed, but apparently very slightly connected with the ser vice now in progress : he paused for them to recover, and began again : " My grandfather has a barn that is altogether better for a place to worship God in than this house." Amazement sat on the faces of the people. Half a century many of them had worshipped the God of their fathers in that venerated house. There they had consecrated their children to His service: there they had been taught the way of life and found it, so that of many it might be said, "this man was born there." To be told now, and in that pulpit, that any man had a barn that was better than that church was nearly enough to drive them mad. Mr. Lusk paused a moment to see the effect of the first shot, and then, with some calmness, he went on to give the obvious reasons why the congregation should build a new house of worship. He had no difficulty in making out a clear case, and his words fell like fire on the heart. It was plain, before he was done, that the knell of the Old White Meeting House was tolling. After service the people talked the matter over, and it was admitted on all hands that the matter must be thought of, if nothing more. The next Sabbath Mr. Lusk took up the subject in a set sermon on the duty of having a fit place for public worship. In the course of few days the congregation were wide awake, some for, and some against the proposal. But the for was the larger party. It became very evident that the opposition came from those whose old associations with the house made it very painful to tear it down, and make all things new. This was a holy sentiment, but it ought not to stand in the way of a movement manifestly made necessary by the decay of the old house, and the demand for a new and better one. If the zeal of the building party abated, it was easily stimu lated by an allusion to a barn belonging to an ancestor of the pastor. The work was begun before the spring was fairly open. Money was subscribed. Materials were given. Bees were held for drawing stone and timber. And so it CALLING BAD NAMES. 2$ came to pass that, by one and another means, and without going to New York or even to Albany for help, the new house was built, very comfortable, neat and appropriate. I had the pleasure of preaching in it within the first year of my ministry. Mr. Lusk, with genius, power, industry and success in the ministry, was never so prominent in the Church and the country as many men are with less than half his ability and learning. This was the result of eccentricities that were per sonally pleasing to his intimate friends, making him an en tertaining companion, but detracting somewhat from his public influence. Probably these traits did not appear in his later life as they did when his reputation was forming. But there is no wrong, and there may be usefulness, in men tioning the fact now, as a hint to young preachers. Mr. Lusk was a pure, good man, of splendid natural gifts im proved by careful study. And many souls brought by him to the knowledge of the truth are his crown of rejoicing now. CALLING BAD NAMES. Some time ago a religious newspaper No. i, in the midst of a controversial article, called another, No. 2, PECKSNIFF. Not long afterwards No. 3 in similar discussion, called No. i PECKSNIFF. A week or two ago, No. 4, under the same cir cumstances, applied the same term to No. 3. It now re mains for No. 2 to call No. 3 PECKSNIFF, and the quartette will be full. It is not likely to be ; for No. 2, " that's me," has too many sins of its own to be casting stones at its neighbors. We have all done the things we ought not to have done. And human nature is so weak, and there is so much human nature in folks, there is no telling how soon we may so far fall from grace as to do the thing that seems the most unseemly. When the word PECKSNIFF was used as a term of re- 26 IREtt&US LETTERS. proach, I took " Martin Chuzzlewit" from a shelf near me, and studied the pen and ink portrait of Mr. Pecksniff, by Dickens. Familiar as I had been with the general features of his face and character, he revealed fresh and startling points as viewed with eyesight sharpened by the fraternal assurance that he was reproduced in my immediate vicinity. Mr. Dickens had drawn this character with masterly skill to illustrate and emphasize the Hypocrite and Humbug. Neither of these words alone expresses the condensed char acter of Mr. Pecksniff. The evil, the devil that our Lord said Judas was, is in a HYPOCRITE; the HUMBUG may want the malice, while he is no less an impostor and deceiver. Both these unlovely and detestable characters rolled into one, wrought out PECKSNIFF. I heard Mr. Vandenhoff read some passages from the story a few days ago, and saw the character more vividly even than I did when listening to similar scenes enacted by the author himself. But in hearing o'r in reading or merely in remembering them, the idea of PECKSNIFF is that of such a consummate scoundrel, that one has hardly patience to believe that the world tolerates such fellows in society.; and no one will be lieve, until he sees the evidence around him, that such men do succeed, where solid merit starves. What then must be the estimate in which we hold a man, a Christian, a fellow- citizen, a co-worker, when we hurl at him the epithet, as a title that expresses our whole opinion of him in one word, PECKSNIFF? We are now passing through a political campaign. It is indeed a campaign, itself a term borrowed from the language of war, where and when on the champaign, or the campagna, the missiles of words instead of bullets have been hurled by the combatants. And what words ! It was a fair commen tary on our political warfare which was made by an intelli gent English gentlemen, writing home from this country during a Presidential campaign, "that it was evident the two worst men in the whole land had been put in nomina tion for the highest office in the gift of the people." And what is even more remarkable, we seem to be wholly uncon- CALLING BAD NAMES. 27 scious ourselves that we are thus offending the laws of taste, charity and common morality. One of the newspapers when speaking of its neighbor as PECKSNIFF, had on the same page a lovely essay on the sin and folly of personali ties. And this evening, with my after dinner cup, I read in the paper yet damp from the press, a leading editorial justly censuring calumny and falsehood by which our best men are assailed, and in the next column, parallel with these just words, is another editorial in which " lying" and " bigotry" and "fanaticism" are imputed to religious men who oppose the editor's views. I cite these examples because they are here before me, of present and pressing interest, flagrant and sickening illustra tions of that insensibility to our own vices which attends the keenest sight and scent of faults in others. O that our eyes had been so made as to enable us to see inwardly as well as outwardly ! But in the days of the Great Teacher, men went about the streets, with beams in their own eyes, trying to pick out little specks from the eyes of their neigh bors. Nobody was ever convicted of error of converted from sin by being called a bad name. Many a man has been con firmed in his wrong doing or wrong thinking by the insult he feels when a name of reproach is given him which he repudiates and resents. It is not impossible that wars, in which rivers of blood have been shed and thousands of lives and millions of treasure lost, might have been averted and avoided, by the use of argument in the place of abusive words. It has sometimes occurred to me that we might have preserved the peace and accomplished all that has been gained of good, if we brethren of the North and the South, had heard and obeyed the call of the Lord, " Come now and let us reason together," instead of indulging in reproach, denunciation, vituperation, as the staple of internecine war fare, until the cannon opened its mouth and drowned all talking in its deadly roar. It is not the way to convert a sinner to knock him down first and then reason with him. God struck Saul with light 28 1REN&US LETTERS. so that he fell from his horse. That kind of argument be longs to the Lord "who alone doeth wondrous things." We cannot send light from heaven. We must approach men with the gentleness of persuasion while we know ourselves the terrors of the Lord. Terms of reproach become sometimes names of honor and are gloried in by those who wear them. Christians, so called first at Antioch, are now the leaders of thought and masters of nations. The cross is no longer a badge of shame. Puritan, Methodist, Huguenot, it matters not what, the name is nothing : there is no argument in it. Politicians try the power of bad names and find they amount to noth ing: Christians, alas ! dishonor themselves by the same sin, and gain a loss by it. It is evil and only evil and that con tinually. How ashamed we shall be of this kind of warfare when we are all together in the Father's house, with equal and un merited glory on our brows ! And this reminds me : Some years ago I had a war of words with a man who did not see with me about well, it was of so little importance that I cannot now remember what we quarrelled about. But we waxed warm, hurled at each other the hardest words we could find in the dictionary ; then ceased to be on speaking terms, and met in silence or passed with no sign of recogni tion. I went abroad, and in the Vale of Chamouni was lodging in a hotel at the foot of Mont Blanc, the monarch of mountains, crowned with snow. Having arrived at even ing, and knowing that sunrise was the most favored hour for beholding the greatest glory that mortal eyes may see, I arose before the sun and, throwing my blanket around me, went out the ground was covered with snow to catch the first view of sunlight on the summit. As I stepped from the door on one side of the court, a stranger, similarly robed and on the same errand bent, emerged from an opposite door; we met midway in the yard, and stopped before the glory then to be revealed. He was my foe in the war of words. With a hearty laugh and glad recognition, as if we had been friends from childhood, we shook hands, and stood, CALLING BAD NAMES. 29 alone and at one, before the Majesty of God in the works of his hand. The king of day was rising; now the peak was glistening in his beams, and then along and down the sheeted sides of the monarch fell the robes of sunlight, dazzling in splendor as if the floor of heaven had given away, and the golden beams were coming down to men. We both thought of the Sunrise Hymn of Coleridge in this vale, and one of us said : " Companion of the morning star at dawn, Thyself earth's rosy star, and of the dawn Co-herald ! Wake, oh wake and utter praise." We went into the breakfast room, called for our coffee and rolls, and, breaking bread together, forgot we ever had a fight, and were good enough friends ever after. He has since passed through another valley into the presence of the great white throne of which Mont Blanc, with the sun for its crown, is the faintest emblem, yet the most glorious we shall see till we stand before the other ! And just now I have received a letter that gives me a touch of the pain that calling bad names causes even in a man who has had so many hurled at him that he ought to be used to them. It is not a thorn in the flesh, as St. Paul had, but it comes from St. Paul in Minnesota from a gen tleman of that city, who informs me that he is a jobber in supplies for pump dealers, plumbers, gas and steam fitters, mills and railroads, steam and hot air heating apparatus, reg isters and ventilators, gas fixtures, pumps, hose, iron pipe, lead pipe, sheet lead, bath tubs, sinks, brass and iron fittings, etc., etc. He writes these words : " Reading ' Irenasus Letters,' I should judge him to be as fat and unctu ous as his style fond of the pleasant ways of life and taking unkindly to the martyr's crown, except by pleasant reference in jaunty style in his snug office or at the mansion of a wealthy entertainer." What an amiable man he must be to write like that ! He thinks I am " fat and unctuous ;" there he .is wrong: " fond of the pleasant ways of life ;" there he is right wisdom's ways are pleasantness and all her paths are peace : I like 30 IREN^EUS LETTERS. them : he thinks I would take " unkindly to the martyr's crown." which is quite probable ; we know not what we are till the trial comes. Grace according to our day is the pro mised help. To be played upon by one who deals in " Hot- air heating apparatus, pumps, hose, iron pipe, sheet lead, and brass fittings," may fit me to bear racks and thumb-screws, and chains and gridirons, by which better men than either of us have been helped into heaven. We cannot all be martyrs : but there is no good reason why we should not be gentlemen and Christians. If I had another life to live and two thousand letters to write again, with God's good help I would not hurt the feelings of the humblest of all God's creatures honestly trying to do good. He might be as big as Daniel Lambert, and I would not call him fat and unc tuous : he might be as lean as Calvin Edson, and I would not call him a bag of bones. I would count each day lost on which I had not made some hearts gladder than they were in the morning ; on which I had not plucked up some thorns, or planted some flowers on the path of human life. No man can so live without enjoying life. Dogs will snarl at him. but angels are around him. He may never have riches or fame, but better than both are friends and God. My St. Paul friend is trying to serve his Master in honest trade : if riches in crease, my prayer is that he may never be pained by receiving a letter like his own. NEW ENGLAND HOMES AND GRAVES. MRS. EASTMAN'S FAMOUS RIDE. Nothing touches me more painfully, in the romantic rural region of New England, than to see large and comfort able houses empty and decaying. I have just returned from a drive of ten miles over the country, and have seen several of them. One was a spacious mansion, with a large courtyard filled with great trees and luxuriant shrubbery and vines, NEW ENGLAND HOMES AND GRAVES. 31 showing that in years gone by it had been the abode of wealth, refinement and taste. Now it was windowless and shattered. Rank vegetation choked the walks and gardens. I passed three or four such deserts on this one drive. They are more or less frequent in many parts of New England. Commercial and manufacturing places and the more fertile lands of the West seduce the inhabitants to emigrate. The tendency of things is out of, not into, these rural regions. If the population of the State increases or holds its own, it is in the growth of villages and cities. And as one passes these vacant dwellings which could now be bought, with plenty of land about them, for a trifle he thinks of the home life that has been enjoyed within them, the fireside, the family, the birth of children, their childish glees, the joys and trials of this world of work and care. If the stones in the hearth or the beams of the wall were to speak, what tales they could tell of domestic and social life in these halls now given up to bats and owls ! THE FIRST PASTOR'S GRAVE. We went into the oldest graveyard in the town of Oilman- ton, N. H. It lies on a plateau, from which we have a wide and lovely view ; it was laid out in 1776, when the first inter ment took place. The first church in the town was near it, and one still remains, but no pastor looks after the scattered and diminished flock. A new school-house, with the best modern furniture in it, shows that these people will have the means of education. It was an impressive hour among the graves of this congregation, a far larger one than now lives. The first settlers of the town are here. In the middle of the enclosure, with a brick monument over him, is the grave of the first pastor, the Rev. Isaac Smith : a man of great re nown, whose fame is still a part of the wealth of Gilmanton. He studied with Dr. Bellamy, and was with Dr. Wheelock at Dartmouth College when that President was wont to call the students together by blowing a tin horn. In the habit of preaching carefully written sermons, he finally laid them 32 1REN&US LETTERS. aside and preached extemporaneously " with great power and eloquence." And of him it was said : " Justice, truth, mercy and goodness shone in his character." He was a Princeton (N. J.) College graduate. On the top of the mon ument is a slate slab covered with an appropriate inscription and these lines by way of epitaph : ' ' Life speeds away, From point to point, tho' seeming to stand still ; The cunning fugitive is swift by stealth ; Too subtle is the movement to be seen, Yet soon man's hour is up, and we are gone." He died in 1817, aged 72; and his wife, who sleeps by his side, died at the same age eleven years after his death. A SPIRITUALISTIC GRAVESTONE. Capt. Daniel Gale, a worthy citizen, whose grandfather, Bartholomew Gale, came from England to Boston, died and was buried here in 1801. His wife Patience died also in 1804. They were buried side by side, and a suitable stone was set to mark their graves. This was nearly 80 years ago. There are older gravestones than theirs in this venerable enclosure, and the more ancient the more interesting is a monument in the eyes of all sensible people. But all peo ple are not sensible, and one of the descendants of this Daniel Gale was foolish enough to become a Spiritualist. While enjoying its nonsense, she received a communication from the long dead Daniel that he wanted a new gravestone over his bones. She was obedient unto the revelation. It was not much of a stone that she caused to be put up, but it is large enough to receive the name of the Captain and his wife, and to say when they went "to the Spirit Land." Then the inscription follows : " Love, Wisdom and Progression." I hope that no mischievous dealer in gravestones will take a hint from this to employ a medium to instigate the present generation to have their ancestors' tombs done over. NE W ENGLAND HOMES AND GRA VES, 33 ROMANCE AND REALITY. Real life has tragedies and episodes and secret histories more remarkable than fiction invents. If any spot in the world could be free from all romantic incidents, this secluded region might be quiet, uniform and natural. It is so for the most part, and years may speed their course without any event to make a ripple on the surface of society. But we rode by one lone house to-day which has its story. The owner of it, when a young man, a prosperous, promis ing farmer, was disappointed in love. He took it so much to heart that it went to his head. He became mildly de ranged. Unable to manage his affairs, the farm fell into the hands of relatives, who took care of it and him. He did nothing but walk around and around his house, in one uniform circle. His footsteps made a path which he never left but to go into the house, when he rested from his circu lar course, to resume his walk on the morrow. Years and years revolved with his revolving pilgrimage, and still he travelled on. All the years of his strong life wore away, and old age came with white hair and beard, making his journey more pitiable in the eyes of friends, who, passing by. would be unnoticed by him on his dreary travel. And so he marched on, until the silver cord was loosed and the wheel at the cistern stood still. In this meadow, the history of the town records, the wife of one of the well-known citizens was killed by lightning while raking hay on the Sabbath day. By her death these lines were suggested : " It was upon the holy Sabbath day, When she went forth to rake the new-mown hay ; The forked lightning fell upon her head, And she was quickly numbered with the dead." Here Mr. Drew froze to death. In this house " a child of Capt. Page was chocked with beans going down the windpipe and died in seven hours." A little lake lies at the foot of 34 IRENMUS LETTERS. the old meeting-house hill, and the records state: "1809, May 28. A man, , ran out of the meeting-house, threw himself into the pond, and was drowned." It seems to me justice to the preacher required that the cause of his rushing out should be stated : couldn't he stand the preach ing ; or did the eloquence of the stalwart Isaac Smith, who was then the pastor, stir his conscience so that in remorse he ran from the house of God and plunged into the placid bosom of the convenient pond? I rode along by the side of this peaceful water and came to the house concerning which another sad story is written : " 1819, Oct. 1 6. Polly chocked herself by tying a garter round her neck." And even more minutely is described the melancholy mode of Mrs. Barter's departure in 1826: "She hung herself on the Sabbath, behind the door, in a dark closet." And so recently as in 1844, a man who bore the same name with the second President of the United States " hung himself in his barn, by a cord twisted from new-made hay, of only eight blades." And the venerable Daniel Lan caster, author of the History of Gilmanton, and now resi dent in the city of New York, relates with like minuteness no less than 82 fatal accidents or suicides in this one town before the year 1845. Many doubtless occurred that are not included in this register, which was closed 35 years ago! Such is human life in the most favorable circumstances for health, peace and sweet content. MARY BUTLER EASTMAN'S RIDE. In a desert field near the roadside we saw a hollow, in which was growing a small tree. The turf now covers the ruins of a dwelling, and the site is marked by this hole, which once was the cellar. A friend who was with me said: ''There Mary Butler, Mrs. Eastman, lived, when she took the famous ride." "Tell me the story, please." " It is a tale of the Revolution. At the very opening of NEW ENGLAND HOMES AND GRAVES. 35 the war this town of Gilmanton was wide awake, and had her delegate, Col. Antipas Oilman, in the Convention, and twelve men from this town, volunteers, were in the front at Bunker Hill. Lieutenant Ebenezer Eastman left his young wife and their first-born infant in the house that stood on this spot, and led this little band to battle. Boston is 90 miles away, but it is said that on the i7th of June, 1775, when the battle of Bunker Hill was raging, the sound of the cannon was distinctly heard. There was no way of getting speedy intelligence, but the news soon came that a great battle had been fought and Lieut. Eastman had been slain. The wife was in church attending public worship when the dreadful report was made. But she would not give credit to it till she had it confirmed. Returning home, she saddled a horse, took her only child, an infant, on the saddle in front of her, and rode through the forests, along the bridle-paths, and in some places guided only by trees that had been blazed. Forty miles of her lonely journey were travelled when she reached her father's house at Brent- wood. She had expected to hear the truth, whatever it was, when this first half of her ride was accomplished. But they had heard only that a great battle had been fought. The fate of her husband was still in the dark. Here she spent the night, and in the morning, leaving the child with her friends, she resumed her saddle, and dashed on another 40 or 50 miles to Charlestown and the arms of her gallant hus band, whom she found alive and well, one of the heroes of Bunker Hill. " That was the feat that is celebrated in song and story as Mary Butler's ride. Butler was her maiden name, and was dropped when she married. She is not known by that name in these parts. We will soon come to the graveyard where she was buried. And as we are riding, I will repeat the names of the eleven children that Mary had, ten of them being born after that memorable journey on horseback to find out whether she was a wife or a widow : their names were Abigail, who was on the saddle with her, Ebenezer, Stephen, Samuel, Nehemiah, Sally, Ira Allen, Polly, Shuah, 36 1REN&US LETTERS. Dolly, and William Butler. And now we have come to the graveyard, and the grave is in the northeast corner." I left the carriage. The gate was fastened (in a manner quite common in the country) with a stake slanted up against it from the outside, and wading through the rank weeds and grass to the spot, I found the headstone easily. On it was inscribed only these words : " To the memory of Mary Eastman, wife of the late Lieut. Ebenezer Eastman, obt. Dec. 13, 1832, aet. 78 yrs. Blessed are the dead that die in the Lord." By the side of her grave is that of her husband, who died 38 years before her, and on his headstone is this inscription : "In memory of Ebenezer Eastman, obt. Oct. 27, 1794. JEt. 48 years. He was one of the first settlers in Gilmanton. He commanded in the Battle of Bunker Hill. He died in early life, but died in the triumphs of faith. 'That life is long enough that answers life's great end." TAXING A CHILD'S BRAIN. A case of remarkable memory, of great folly and atrocious cruelty, is brought to my knowledge. There is no doubt that the facts are as you will now read them, and you will be prepared, when you have read them, to believe with me that the party in fault deserves severe censure, and perhaps punishment. But the case ought to be made public as a warning to teachers and parents and children. In a class of one of our Sabbath-schools was a girl of fine promise, bright, studious, serious, and fond of the school and the Bible, which she read with attention. She was in the habit of committing large portions of it to memory, and reciting them with fluency and correctness. This led hef teacher to encourage the child, exciting her pride and ambi tion, as well as fostering the idea that nothing was too hard TAXING A CHILD'S BRAIN. 37 for her to accomplish. A few weeks ago the teacher pro posed to the girl to commit to memory the Proper names in the Bible so as to repeat them at one recitation ! ! ! Anything more absurd, more foolish, and more cruel in the way of a Sabbath-school lesson, it would be hard to invent. No possible benefit could be derived from the knowledge were it obtained. What good would it do for a minister or anybody else to be able to repeat all the names of men, women, cities, countries, rivers and peoples men tioned in the Bible ? If the child had a concordance of the Scriptures, in which all these words are arranged as in a dic tionary, she could work at them more readily than by taking them as they stand in the Bible itself. But it is quite likely that it would aid the memory to use the text of the Bible, and have the association with chapters and verses. I am not informed as to the mode in which she undertook to work out the useless task. But she came to her class as usual, and the pious teacher, taking the Bible in hand, lis tened and watched, while the little martyr stood up bravely to the torture and went through it from beginning to end ! AND SWOONED AWAY. On recovery she was led home to her mother, a pitiable, perhaps ruined child. Now I have no words of indignation adequate to express the censure which this injudicious teacher deserves for in flicting such a task upon a child, or permitting her to under take it, or even allowing her to repeat the result of it. It may be that the teacher will say the child proposed it, or performed it of her own choice without being told to do it. But it is of little moment whether this particular task was self-imposed or not: the girl was made a martyr to her memory, being encouraged in these feats until she taxed her brain to a degree that will probably result in life-long weak ness, if not early death. It would have been quite as wise, Christian and kind, to have put the child in a walking-match, to see if she could walk six days running. The physical strain would soon show for itself the injury done, and the victim would be rescued. The mental strain does not appear in the suffering until the task is accomplished, and then 38 I RE N^, US LETTERS. comes the reaction, revealing the fatal effects of the folly and the sin. In Sabbath-schools, as a general rule, the child's memory is not employed as much as it should be. Instead of, or in connection with, answers to questions in a book, every child ought to repeat at least six verses of Holy Scripture every Sabbath day. This may be easily attained by the admirable habit of learning one verse every day in the week, reviewing and repeating them all on the Sabbath morning, and then going with them to the school, there to be recited to the teachers. These verses thus treasured will be more precious than rubies as long as life lasts. In this way I learned in childhood some of the Psalms that are now like pearls. " Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity," was one of them ; the 23d Psalm, and the I39th, were also learned in the same way, and mark this what portions of Scripture I did not learn then, I have never learned. The study of the Bible since has doubtless made me acquainted more and more with its meaning, its breadth and depth and power : but when I woo repose, or seek communion with the Author, or would soar into regions of divine contemplation, the portions of God's word that were ingrafted before I was twelve years old, re fresh me as did the old oaken bucket that hung in the well, when, a heated and wearied boy, I took its waters on my parched lips. Sweet as, yes, sweeter than the honey-comb are words that have lived in memory half a century, while they who taught me are with David and Mary in the king dom of glory. It would be a blessed reaction and reform if our Sabbath-schools would encourage and require every scholar to commit to memory six verses of the Bible every week. But that does not mitigate the folly of the teacher who puts upon a child the absurd task of learning to repeat by rote the Proper names of the Bible ! It may be that her memory was of that abnormal type which easily retains vast sums and sounds without associating with them thoughts. Persons have been known to repeat whole columns of a news- TAXING A CHILD'S BRAIN. 39 paper after once hearing them read. Cyrus knew the name of each soldier in his mighty army. Shepherds have had a name for each 3~heep in a great flock. Pastors have been able to call each of their many lambs by name. A lady near me repeated every word of the Shorter Catechism on the day she was five years old. I can now repeat the exceptions to the rule under the 3d declension of Latin nouns ending in e of the Ablative case, though I have not seen them since early childhood, and we used to say there were more exceptions than examples. But all these are as nought compared with the silly task of pressing on the brain of a poor child more than 2,000 Proper nouns, that cannot be used when learned, and which no sensible person ever tried to learn. Just take a lit tle slice out of the lesson. There are 28 names in the Bible beginning with the letter O, viz.: Obadiah, Obal, Obed, Obed-Edom, Obil, Ocran, Oded, Og, Ohel, Olympas, Omar, Omega, Omri, On, Onan, Onesimus, Onesiphorus, Ophel, Ophir, Ophrah, Oreb, Orion, Oman, Orpah, Othni, Othniel, Ozem, Ozias. How long would it take you to master that short list ? It is very easy to get the run of words that have some principle of association among them. " Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers : where is the peck of pic kled peppers that Peter Piper picked?" is easier to learn than to say. The i iQth Psalm, in the original, is divided into sec tions, each beginning with the letter at the head of the divis ion, and thus that longest of the Psalms was more easily learned. There are systems of mnemonics, artificial aids of more or less use according to one's taste or needs. The very simple rule is " the strength with which two ideas, words, or things, stick together in the memory, is in the inverse ratio of their phrenotypic distance." You understand that, and all you have to do is to apply it and you will remember almost anything else. Have mercy on the children. Spare their infant brains the labor of holding what is of no value, and may greatly injure them. When I see children on the street taking home their books, maps, &c., after five or six hours in school, I am tempt ed to complain of their teachers and parents to that useful 4 IRENES US LETTERS. institution for the " Prevention of Cruelty to Children." It is very well to invade the circus and theatre and rescue acro bats and ballet dancers : it is very well to stop Italian beggar boys from following monkeys and organ-grinders : but better and humaner would be the charity that should open the eyes of mothers and others to. the sinful folly of overlading the young mind with the lore of books, when what they more need is beef and fresh air. And if the S. P. C. C. will arrest and punish the Sunday- school teacher whose indiscretion inspires this epistle, I will pay the expenses of the prosecution. SUMMER BOARD AND SUMMER BOARDERS. " Advice gratis" is never taken to be worth anything. As the fruit of long experience may be of some practical use to a numerous class of people, viz., boarders and those who take boarders in the country, I offer this letter under the trees to my fellow-sufferers and friends. ADVICE TO THOSE WHO TAKE BOARDERS. First get a gridiron. This is a kitchen utensil made of iron ; as the name indicates. It differs from a griddle in a very important respect : the griddle is a solid flat surface on which meat or any compost may be fried in fat. Everybody in the country knows a griddle. It has been in use from time immemorial, and the soft memories of griddle-cakes linger in the mind of every one who was raised in this or any other land of cakes. A frying-pan is used for the same purpose as a griddle, and for other purposes, the chief of them indicated by the name. It is for frying. But a gridiron is another and a totally different article. Its nature, design and duty are in a line of service distinct and different in all that concerns the comfort, health and life of the boarder who, for the time being, is your guest, and looks to you to be his minister in things pertaining to his daily SUMMER BOARD AND SUMMER BOARDERS- 41 food. Gradually approaching my subject, again I ask, have you a gridiron ? Or, not having one, do you know what it is ? It consists of several narrow separated iron bars usually lying parallel, secured at the ends, so that they will support a slice of meat, or a cleft chicken, over a bed of glowing coals. The process of cooking meat on a gridiron is broiling, in con tradistinction from frying, which is done in a griddle or pan. In the latter case, the flesh is cooked in its own fat, which becomes set or fixed in the meat, baked, jellied, and the food is tough, hard and indigestible. In the broiling process the outside is quickly charred, the juices are retained, and the meat is more tender, better flavored and far more digestible. The same difference exists between baking and roasting. Put a piece of beef or a turkey into a pan and shut it up in a hot oven till it is done, and you call it roasted, but it is not : it is baked. Put it on a spit, in a Dutch oven standing before the fire, or hang it over the coals and let it cook and drip, basting it meanwhile with things appropriate, and the meat will be roasted. The difference between baked and roasted meats is similar to the difference between fried and broiled. And the difference in the taste, though great, is not so great as the difference in the digestibility of the two. The frying-pan is the source of a large part of the dyspepsia that abounds in the country. And so painfully sensible are many people on this subject, they will not eat that which is fried, preferring to fast rather than become the victims of a fit of indigestion which with them is sure to follow the eating of meats that are thus cooked. Therefore, I say unto you, whosoever purpose first to take summer boarders from the city, get unto yourselves a grid iron. I do not deny that the frying-pan has its uses. And the saying " out of the frying-pan into the fire" is so ancient, that it is certain the utensil is of no modern date. But many evils in this world are of long standing, and antiquity is no palliation of their ill-deserts. It does indeed render them more respectable, and much harder of extirpation, but they do not grow better with age; and their respectability does not forbid their criticism. 42 IREN&US LETTERS. There is a moral aspect also in which this gridiron versus frying-pan question is to be viewed. Good digestion is in order to the normal exercise of the moral faculties. Much of that depression of spirit which gets the name of religious melancholy, gloom, loss of hope, actual despair, comes of dyspepsia. A writer on physiology says : " Many persons do not exactly know where their stomach is, and a still larger number are apt to forget that it lies very close underneath the heart." Just so nearly related in morals, as in physics, are the stomach and the heart. This is another and constraining consideration in favor of roasting and broiling, and against baking and frying our meat. Passing from this, but without leaving the table, let me intimate in the gentlest terms that are adequate to the emer gency, that city boarders in the country desire abundance of those things which are supposed to be abundant in the rural districts. Yet to my certain knowledge farmers and others who have attracted summer boarders to their houses, send eggs, poultry, and even milk to market, while their boarders are hungering and thirsting after some of these good things, and find them not. Fruit and vegetables which ought to be furnished in the greatest profusion, are often far more of a rarity in the country than in the city. For this there is no adequate excuse. It is little short of robbery, it is certainly an imposition, to offer board in the country, without making provision for the supply of those staples of the country with out which health and contentment are impossible. This is more emphatically true when children are to be fed. And when they cry for food, it is a shame that they cannot have plenty of that which is convenient for them. Yet many a good matron in the country thinks to please her boarders by pastries and puddings, while she neglects the weightier matters, such -as poultry and peas. And the bed ; O my friend, have pity on the weary bones of your guest, who has been beguiled to your rural resting place. That is not a bed for an honest man that you have made of straw, or shavings, or husks. A good bed may, SUMMER BOARD AND SUMMER BOARDERS. 43 perhaps, have been made out of some such materials ; and I have slept on worse beds, and been happy and thankful. If duty or necessity required, one might sleep on the oaken floor, or on a rock out of doors, and enjoy it. But that does not make it right for you to put me upon a bed worse than my desired gridiron, and charge me a round price for the luxury ! I have been at the seaside, and in the mountains, and in country villages, paying fair prices for summer board, and the beds were so thin, hard, uneven, hillocky, musty, and the pillows so insignificant in size and so contemptible in material, that each night was a torment instead of a re freshment, and " O how welcome was the morning light !" I will not write to you of cleanliness. No rhetoric will open the eyes to dirt. The faculty of seeing it is a gift ; and with all your gettings, if you have not a horror of this great evil you will never acquire it. Therefore, one must put up with your infirmity once and never suffer it again. Yet cleanliness is a grace that crowns the rest with a halo, and without it a palace would be unendurable by a " pure and virtuous soul." Pardon these hints. I will now speak to the boarders. They need speaking to. They are unreasonable, exacting, provoking, ungrateful, impertinent, and take so many airs upon themselves that I must take them down a little. There are many excellent people, who spend a few weeks or months in the country every summer, reasonable, Chris tian, pleasant people, who have regard to the rights and feelings, and even the weaknesses and shortcomings of others. To such good people, of whom the world is hardly worthy, why should I write ? I could not make them any better if I were to try. And my fear is that the other sort of boarders will imagine that they too are perfect ; and so between them both my words will be like water spilled on the floor, that does no good where it is, and cannot be gathered up again. One of the most difficult of all attainments is the art of easily and gracefully adapting one's-self to any circumstances, 44 IREN&US LETTERS. so as to be at home, and agreeable, whether all things go to one's satisfaction or not. To be thoroughly pleased with the arrangements that others make for us, after having for a time abandoned our own, is next to impossible. Hence we put it as the highest proof of being pleased, that we are per fectly at home. Next to being so, is the honest effort to make others feel that you are so. To find everything in a farm-house, or boarding-house, or a hotel, as you left it at home is out of the question. And it often happens that the more show, fuss and cost, the less real comfort is afforded. But if you go to the country with a conviction that be cause you are city bred, you will be " looked up to," and treated with a deference that your rank is entitled to, you will be disappointed. Many city people, especially those who have suddenly acquired wealth, assume the position of superiors, and when they act out their assumptions, they make themselves both ridiculous and unhappy. It is the token of true nobility to make even the lowliest at ease in your presence. And the advent of such a well-bred person into the house of a rural family is soon found to be a pleas ure to the old and the young. While on the other hand, the airs and tones, and fidgets and fretfulness, and sneers and complaints of a parvenu are enough to make a boarding- house wretched to all its inmates. Some people imagine that they will be thought genteel just in proportion to the number of times they ring the bell and call for a servant to wait upon them. They are careful also not to manifest in terest in the family whose services they pay for, and by keep ing a thick wall between them and others they hope to ex hibit that exclusiveness which they have conceived to be the specific mark of high aristocracy. Such people are never comfortable. And happy is that house and that neighbor hood where none of them go to board in the summer. On the very common sense principle that every one is bound to make himself useful wheresoever he lives and moves, what a world of good might be done if each city boarder were a missionary in the country ! Not of religion SUMMER BOARD AND SUMMER BOARDERS. 45 only. That duty needs no preaching from me. Bear in mind that you are not your own, and you do not live for yourselves even when seeking health and pleasure away from home. But there are other duties, not classed under the head of religious, though in one sense all duties are religious the duty of making the best of everything; of enduring what is past curing; of bearing other people's bur dens ; of wearing a kindly face and speaking friendly words ; of being the servant of those who need service, albeit they are ungrateful. There is a way to make the house and grounds cheerful by such a manner as will spread itself like the breeze and sun shine, gladdening all hearts, and giving pain to none. There is also a way to make everybody uncomfortable because you seem to be so : it is a habit of finding fault with everything, or certainly with many things : of often saying, " How much better everything is at home than here :" which may be very- true, and yet it may be very unkind to say it ; and it is gen erally agreed that those people who live the most shabbily at home, find the most fault and put on the greatest airs when they are away. And there are many you, dear friends, are among them who take delight in making the village, or country-side, or the sea-side brighter and better by your presence, identifying yourself, even for a little while, with the church, and every good work that needs a helping hand, and leaving behind you memorials of your usefulness, that will often call up your name among the country people who, for a time, had you as a summer boarder. 4<5 IREN&US LETTERS. A COUNTRY PASTOR'S SERMON. It would have done you good to be with me yesterday. Up here among the hills, and therefore the valleys, we have "the stated means of grace," and very good means they are, better by many degrees than are sometimes enjoyed or endured in the more elevated parts of the Church. The min ister is much more of a man than he looks to be. And he looks to be more and more of a man the oftener you set your eyes on him, especially if you can see him when you can hear him also. Personal appearance ought not to be of much account in the pulpit, but it is. He is of medium height and age. His voice is strong, so is his style. Earnest, and yet gentle, he commands and wins. He has been here ten years, and has a firm hold on the affections and respect of the people. He deserves it. I have no wish to disturb him by publish ing his name abroad, but I will give you a specimen of his preaching. It will be only a skeleton, wanting the muscle, blood and life of his discourse. The text shows that he is a thinking man who finds suggestions of truth where others see only the one beautiful and simple story. It was a line taken from the narrative of the woman at the Well of Samaria : "THOU HAST NOTHING TO DRAW WITH AND THE WELL IS DEEP." The well is the infinite truth of God in his written Word. The deep things of God are not so deep as to be entirely beyond the reach of those who have something to draw with, but for those who thus come without, there is no help : they cannot get a drop of water from the well of salvation, the Word of eternal life. This is the simple explanation of the well-known fact that many who are called the people of God go all their lifetime without obtaining, clear, comforting and satisfactory views of divine truth : they are perplexed with doubts and fears, and even suffer so severely from want of water, that they dry up and become skeptics, unbelievers, and perish in their ignorance and sin. They have nothing to A COUNTRY PASTOR'S SERMON. 47 draw with and the well is deep. They can get nothing out of it to slake the thrist of their immortal souls. The man of science, or the wise philosopher, or the learned rationalist, comes to the well, each with his own instruments for the measurement of its depth and to get the water up to the surface. Each of them makes a trial. The man of science discovers that there is nothing in it, for he can prove that many mistakes have been made by those who have relied upon it for a supply of water. The philosopher says it is far better to seek water at a running stream or a bubbling fountain, than at the bottom of a well. And the rationalist is sure there is no water in it, for he has often tried to get a drink and always found it exceedingly dry. The preacher described, in very neat and appropriate terms, the motions of these wise men in their explorations of the well, going all about it, peering over the edge of it, and look ing down into the abyss, and turning away in disgust because there was no water they could reach. They had nothing to draw with and the well was deep. This is just the difference between those who have and those who have not the means by which the water of life is to be drawn from the well of God's eternal Word. The woman of Samaria (he said) knew not that she was speaking to the Saviour himself : the foun tain of life : the living well, when she told him He had noth ing to draw with. But he opened unto her the gospel and revealed Himself to her, and then to her friends, as the water of which if a man drinks he will never thirst again. And so it is in all the ages of the world. To get the water of life out of the truth of God, it is needful only to come through Jesus Christ, with humble faith in Him who is the way and the truth, and the water which no man of science or wisdom can draw with all his inventions, will spring up in him in stantly unto everlasting life. The untutored peasant, in his cottage with the Bible on his knee, reads, loves and receives. It is refreshment to his soul. Not to the traveller in a dry and thirsty land is a gushing spring more gladdening than is the promise, and the poetry, and the story of God's mighty Word, to the humble and believing child of poverty, or sor- LETTERS. row, who receives it as a child, and trusts his soul with joyful faith in the Divine word. "I remember," said he, "the 'old oaken bucket that hung in the well,' and the gladness with which I pressed my dry lips to its rim and drank the cool water which, in a hot sum mer day, I had drawn from the well. I knew the water was there: the bucket was there: and before I ever drew it I knew it was good. And I come with the same childlike con fidence to the fountain of God's Word : I know it is pure and true and good : and that I may drink of it freely and abun dantly and shall live forever. 1 do not take a microscope and examine each drop to see if there be any impurity in it : nor do I search the town records to ascertain if it be the same well that our fathers drank of : I come to it with faith, and love, and joy ; and its waters are sweet to my taste, and my thirst is slaked, my heart is full, and I bless God for the provision of his holy Word." It is quite impossible for me to give a fair and adequate impression of this able and ingenious discourse. Its obvious object, and he worked it out well, was to show that the spirit of captious criticism, or of doubt and fear, was fatal to the understanding and enjoyment of the truth : that Christ gives the water to them who believe and do His will, and he quoted the familiar texts of Scripture that teach this elementary truth of the gospel, that they who are willing to obey shall know of the doctrine. I looked over the congregation, and observed them care fully as I came with them out of the house at the close of the service, and saw that they were rural and simple folk : not rude, but unfamiliar with what is called the world: and under the wise teachings of this noble preacher and pastor they were being trained intelligently for the true enjoyment of religion and for glory beyond the skies. Happy people! They have something to draw with when they come to the well. Their pure, unclouded faith, that no shade of doubt ever disturbed for an hour, brings to their lips and their hearts the cooling draughts, and they will never thirst with out having the living waters springing up in them unto ever lasting life. AfXS. DOREMUS. 49 MRS. DOREMUS. Soon after my coming to New York, to the work that still is my life-work, Mrs. Doremus called to enlist me in aid of some scheme of benevolence, to which she had put her hand. She had then been more than ten years the leading spirit in missionary enterprise: having been one of those noble women in 1828 who sent out aid to the Greeks by the hand of Jonas King, and in 1834, with Mrs. Divie Bethune, had set on foot a plan to educate women in the East, a scheme that ripened into that mighty ministry of mercy the Woman's Union Missionary Society a tree with many branches, whose leaves are for the healing of the nations. When she came to me thirty-seven years ago it was in the interest of the City and Tract Mission, and afterwards the City Bible Society; and by and by the House and School of Industry, and the Nursery and Child's Hospital, and then that grand establishment, the Woman's Hospital. Dr. Sims, who is the father of that house of mercy, has told me that he made no headway with his project till he went to Mrs. Dore mus, who touched it, and it lived. What men could not do, she did. Even the Legislature of the State obeyed her will, m&gave the charter. All the charities of the city, of every sect and of none, private or public, were objects of her solicitude and prayers. I never knew which one was her peculiar care. She had no hobby, and made no claim that this or that object was the most important. She was the good genius of every good work, and so the blessing of all the good came on her. It was a privilege and a joy to do what she wanted done. Her wishes in the sphere of Christian work were laws which it was a pleasure to obey. For full well did I know her wisdom was equal to her zeal, and it was safe to assist in any plan which had enlisted her intelligent support. Nearly forty years I have seen her at work : have recorded much of it : have gazed on it with wonder, and sometimes with awe ! Not one plan of hers has been the subject of just 50 IREN&US LETTERS. criticism. Never has the manner of her work been open to exception. She never betrayed a weakness, never assumed a prominence that was not becoming a sensible, Christian wife, mother, lady and woman. I have the memoirs of nearly three thousand women, dis tinguished in many ages, for deeds that have made their names illustrious in the annals of time. Among them there is not one, no, not one, whose record is more bright and beautiful in the light of heaven than hers. I have studied these records carefully and dispassionately, and if now the women were standing before me in one shining company, I would say without fear, " Many daughters have done virtu ously, but thou, my friend, excellest them all." Some of them wore crowns and had power that was not hers. Others were endowed with gifts to write, and have filled the world with their fame. Some have gone on foreign missions, and others among the sick and wounded, and have visited prisons and founded orphanages, and made thousands of homes and hearts glad with the music of their lives. I have not forgotten their names or their deeds. I remember the women of Old Testament times, and the Marys of the gospel, and her who bathed her Saviour's feet with her tears : I believe in the sainted women of the Church of Rome, whose works will be in everlasting remembrance, and the martyrs whose blood was the least of their gifts to the cause of their Redeemer: and the noble women of modern times whose pious labors for the poor and the insane have added lustre to the beauty of their sex, and entitled them to the gratitude of mankind. I know their names, and love to read them on the roll to be called when the King shall say, " Come ye blessed of my Father." But of them all there is not one who wrought more for Christ than she whose name is like ointment poured forth among us, and whose virtues shall be cherished as her richest legacy to the Church of God. The fine arts have preserved the form and features of the great and good, who thus live on canvas and in marble. Churches and galleries and parks are made luminous with these memorials. It is a good thing to set up a stone to the MRS. DOREMUS. 51 praise of virtue, that it may, though dead, continue to speak. It is no waste of ointment to pour it on the Master's feet, though it might have been sold for the poor : for it is to be always a memorial of holy love. So it would be well if the women, and the men likewise, would cause to be made a statue in the form and likeness of our friend Mrs. Doremus, of the purest, whitest marble, bending beneath the weight of years and many loads of care, faint yet pursuing, the image of the heavenly shining on her seraphic brow. Such a statue is due to her who fulfilled every trust and mission God ever gave to woman, and, by what she was, taught us what woman ought to be. Such a statue, in the vestibule of the Woman's Hospital, would be a monument to the sex she adorned : for she was a type and example of what woman is when she makes real in her life-work the conception of Him who created her in his own image. The money it would cost would be worthily ex pended, for in all time to come it would testify to the power and the beauty of one who was spent for Christ and his. I have looked with silent admiration on the statues of great men and fair women that make beauteous the palaces of art in the old world : where ancient civilizations and ex tinct mythologies have been preserved in their highest con ceptions of what is had in reverence and love : I have read in story and song of the ideal of genius, 4 ' A creature not too bright and good For human nature's daily food : The reason firm, the temperate will, Endurance, foresight, strength and skill, A perfect woman nobly planned, To warn, to comfort and command ;" but I never found in marble, or canvas, or history, or poetry, one that embodied the idea of useftdness so perfectly as it was presented in the life-work of our sainted friend. It is well to perpetuate the memory of such a woman. But whether we build a monument or carve her form in stone, her record is on high, and in the hearts of thousands and the history of the Church her memory will never die. 52 IREN^US LETTERS. THE BEAR IN BOSTON. On Christmas Day the children of the Sabbath-school being gathered to sing their hymns, receive their gifts, and hear a few speeches, I was called on to say something, and this was what came of it. Since we were last in this place to celebrate our Christmas festival, a bear died in Boston. If it seems strange to you that I mention this fact to-day, and you see no bearing that it has on the subject before us, bear with me a little and you shall see and hear. You have all come here from homes that ought to be happy, where your parents have tried to please you by mak ing Christmas merry, and loading you with good things. They care for you, feed and clothe you, pray for you, and deserve your respect, obedience, and love. But there are many families, yours may be of the number, where the chil dren are disobedient, disrespectful to their parents, and un lovely, and it is of this sin of the young that I am to speak to you, taking for my text THE BEAR THAT DIED IN BOSTON. It was a private bear. His owner was a gentleman who took a fancy to such a pet, and when his favorite died, he determined to bury the bear with respect. Boston is in ad vance of us in many things. We never have yet had a funeral for a bear in this city, but the proprietor of this Boston bear invited the wise men of the town to assemble and assist at the burial of his dead friend. Among the poets, philoso phers, and philanthropists who abound in Boston was Dr. Holmes, a celebrated physician and wit, who was invited, and he replied to the note of invitation that "he was sorry he could not attend : for ever since he read in his youth of the bears of Bethel, who taught the children to respect old age, he had had great respect for bears as moral instructors ; and he thought if one were employed to go about Boston THE BEAR IN BOSTON. 53 and its suburbs for the same purpose, the effect would be salutary upon the youthful population." It is my belief if one bear would be good in Boston to teach the children respect for their parents and older people generally, a dozen bears might be usefully employed in New York and its vicinity in giving lessons to our irreverent youth. You remember the bears of Bethel to which Dr. Holmes referred, the bears whose moral forces produced such lasting impressions upon his early mind. The naughty chil dren in the days of Elisha saw the good prophet going along the way, and they mocked him, made fun of him and of his bald head, when two bears came out of the woods and tore more than forty of them. But our boys are not afraid of bears. I have heard of one boy who made mock of an old gentleman in the streets, and then, jumping behind a bale of goods, put out his head and called aloud, " Now bring on your bears." What a wicked boy ! But it is not alone in such insults to the old that young America shows his disrespect. There are thousands of boys and girls in this city who call their father " the old man," and their mother " the old woman :" boys and girls of twelve or fifteen years, who think they are wiser than the parents, and insist upon going when and where they please; who will have the kind of dress, and just such a hat or bonnet, and just such company, and such amusements as they please ; and they will worry or badger their parents till they get what they want. And this disobedience is not confined to the city; it is almost as common in the country, and all the country over : it is the vice of the age, and the parent of many vices. A gentleman riding in the country heard a man calling to his son to come into the house, and as the boy paid no attention to the call, the traveller stopped and asked the lad if he heard his father calling. " Oh ! y-a-a-s," replied the youth, "but I don't mind what he says. Mother don't neither ; and 'twixt us both, we've about got the dog so he don't." All over the land it is the same thing. Children and young people are less mindiul ol their manners towards the old 54 IREN^EUS LETTERS. than they once were. I asked a boy the other day in one of the street cars to rise and give his seat to a lady, and he an swered, " Five cents is jist as good for me as her, let her stand." Manners are not as they once were, at home or on the street. And from disobedience to parents comes disre gard of law and order ; then comes crime and punishment. The fifth commandment is a promise of long life to them that honor their parents : for the child who refuses to obey his father or mother, begins vice early, is likely to go on from bad to worse, and it is not strange if he comes to some bad end. Many a man under the gallows has traced his career of crime back to the time when he refused to submit to his father's will. When I was travelling in the East, I saw near many large towns a pit or valley where the carcases of dead beasts were cast, and there came the birds of prey and feasted upon the carrion. In ancient times, if not now, the bodies of men put to death for crime were thrown out into the same place to be devoured. And then I understood the terrible mean ing of that strange passage in the Book of Proverbs : "The eye that mocketh at his father and despiseth to obey his mother, the ravens of the valley shall pick it out, and the young eagles shall eat it." These birds of prey may not, will not, indeed, come down to tear out the eyes of children in the streets, but the child who begins when young to despise the counsels and com mands of his or her parents, is in the bad broad way that leads to destruction. Now in the morning of life, while home is happy and par ents are dear to you, and Christmas presents are in heaps around you, love, honor, and obey those who are so good to you. So shall it be well with you all the days of your life, and each year shall be happier than the one before. IT'S HIS WA y. 55 IT'S HIS WAY. " It must be right ; I've done it from my youth." Crabbe. My friend was defending the conduct of a man whom I had censured with some severity. " O it's his way. You mustn't be hard on him. He is not to be judged by the same rules that other men are. You know there was always a queer streak in him, and in deed it runs through the family: they are all queer: you must overlook some things in them that would not be put up with in other people." This talk may savor of the charity that covers a multitude of sins, but its does not make the sins any the less, nor the sinner more excusable in the sight of God and all right- thinking people. There is a way that seems right to a man, and perhaps to some of his friends as well-, but it is wrong, nevertheless, and there is a terrible hell at the end of it. When you come to morals, there is no such thing as a code of right and wrong for one man and not for another. There are degrees of light, and capacity, and opportunity, and we must not measure all men by the same standard to determine the amount of blame or praise to which they are entitled. It is required of a man according to what he hath. Unto whom much is given of him much is required. And vice versa. But to every man unto whom the light of divine truth has come, the standard of right and wrong is the same ; and nobody, however great or small, shall escape his re sponsibility for wrong by the plea, " It's my way, and you mustn't mind it." Yet you have often heard this plea set up in defence of public men, and private Christians, whose ways are so out of the common, so repugnant to good morals, that they would be condemned without mercy if their offence had just once come to the knowledge of the world, but they are pardoned and rather petted and liked for their boldness and eccen- 5 6 tRENsEUS LETTERS. tricity, if they put a fair face on it and keep on until people say " It's their way." In reply to my friend's remark, I said: "Suppose, now, that the Rev. Dr. A., or Judge B., or Gen. C. had done the very same things that are not only charged upon your man, but are admitted on all hands to have been done by him, and are justified by him and gloried in, what would you say ? Would you palliate their conduct ? Would you still respect them as honorable, honest, and good men? Or would you turn upon them as wrong-doers, the more worthy of contempt and condemnation because of their position, knowledge, and power ?" He owned up to the force of the argument, and fell back on his first principle. "Yes, yes: that's all true, but all men are not alike, and that's his way: he doesn't mean to do wrong." One of my neighbors was telling me about his minister : said he, " I like his preaching, but his manner of doing it is awful. He has no ease, no grace, no dignity : he makes wry faces, and awkward gestures, and acts all the time as if some thing was hurting him. But then ' it's his way.' " Certainly it is, and a very bad way, too. It hinders and harms his usefulness : takes away from the force of the truth : pains the hearer when he ought to be attracted ; and so the Word, even the Word of God, is made of none effect. He has been taught better, and is yet so young that he might cure himself of these disagreeable habits that have become so characteristic as to be called his. But he himself thinks they are his -ways, and therefore innocent and rather great. Dr. Johnson was a bear among men and women, his manners intolerable and his speech outrageous. It was allowed and even enjoyed, on the ground that it was " his way." But that made it no more decent. And no amount of genius or learning will justify a man among men in failing to be a gentleman. All peculiarities are not to be found fault with. Far from it. Every man has a way of his own, as his face and walk and voice are unlike every other face and walk IT'S HIS WAY. 57 and voice. To be distinguished for virtues is itself a virtue. Dr. Cox was told that Calvin Colton said of him, " If it were not for his Coxisms, Dr. Cox would be a great man." "Yes," said Dr. Cox, "he might have been Calvin Colton." Learning, wit, goodness, every good, may adorn and illus trate a man's life, and the more of such ways a man has the better for the world he lives in, his age, his country, the Church, and the kingdom of God. But it sadly happens for the most part that we speak of "his way" or "my way" as an excuse for something that might be better. Mr. D. comes home from his day's work weary and hungry, and therefore (he thinks it is therefore) cross. He makes himself specially unpleasant to the little family whom he ought to brighten and bless by words of cheer and love. But " his ways" are not ways of pleasantness. And so it comes to pass that his paths are not the paths of peace. For as iron sharpeneth iron, so one cross man in a house crosses all the rest, and he gets as good as he gives. Like begets like. The savor of his presence while the mood is on him spreads a pall on the spirits of the household ; cold ness, petulance, and general discomfort reign. Over the evening meal he thaws and melts and the better nature flows : the children catch the returning tide and begin to play in it : the man is himself again and the house is glad. It is " his way" to be out of sorts when he comes home. And it is a bad way, a mean way, a wicked way, and he ought to repent of it and be reformed. I never heard Mr. E. (a man whose company I am often in) speak well of anybody but himself. His rule is : " If you can't say something ill of a man, say nothing." That's his way. He goes on the principle that if a cause is good, or a man is good, or a woman is all right, there's no need of talking about it, him or her; but if there is a screw loose, or room for improvement, or danger of going wrong, it is best to say so, and so make it better. And on this ground he finds fault with everything. He is a pessimist. The worst side of everybody is before his eye. The spots on the sun 5 8 I REN ^E US LETTERS. fix his attention. No sermon ever satisfied his mind or escaped his criticism. The newspaper he enjoys in exact proportion to the number of mistakes he finds in it. Society is out of joint, in his judgment. Nobody knows how to do anything as it ought to be done. If they would only let him run things for a while, he would show them how to do it. He is disgusted generally, and takes pains to say so. This is his way. And it is just about the most disagreeable way a man can have. He forgets that other people are annoyed by his in cessant grumbling ; that most people love to take cheerful views of things, to look on the bright side, to hope for the best, to find good even in the midst of evil, and to try to im prove what can be mended, and not to fret about what can't be helped. Mr. E. often comes into my office and wants me to "come down on" this man and that society 'and cause ; and he thinks I am timid and time-serving because I will not let him swing his whip over the backs of all the saints and re form them, as he thinks, into necessary righteousness. He is the most unsanctified friend I have, and yet he thinks all the rest wrong and himself about right. I have no fear of offend ing him by saying this, for his self-righteousness renders him all unconscious of his sinful infirmity, and the first time I see him he will thank me "for giving it to those everlasting faultfinders." " Mark the perfect man." Would that we might have a chance. There was one. No guile was ever found in his mouth. He was meek and lowly in heart, and the lion also of his tribe. He loved those who hated him. He gave his life for others. His way was like the going forth of the sun. And all the nations are blessed in him. His friends never had to make an apology for him. His judge could find no fault in him. His ways were not offensive to any good people. And he was lifted up to draw all men unto him. So, my friend, bear in mind when you say, in defence of a habit, " It's my way," or " It's his way," the strong presump tion is it's a bad way. A PASTOR AND FRIEND. 59 A PASTOR AND FRIEND. When the Rev. Dr. Dickinson, first President of Prince ton College, was on his death-bed, the rector of the Episco pal church in the village (they were in Elizabethtown) was also dying. The President was first released, and when the rec tor was told that his friend and neighbor had gone, he ex claimed, " O that I had hold of his skirts." This was the thought of Elisha when the other prophet went up. It was my first desire when I heard that my old friend Dr. Brinsmade, of Newark, had been suddenly translated. Eighty years old : full of years, full of grace, with his arms full of sheaves, rejoicing in the Lord : he was not, for God took him. What a tide of emotion rushed in as I remembered the years of our daily companionship, while he was pastor and I led the Sabbath-school. The friendship was warm, tender and holy ; as free from dross as human friendship can be ; cemented by the common love we had for Christ, His Church, and especially the lambs of His flock. For them we labored hand in hand, and great was our joy and reward. You will be interested in some of the recollections I have of this dear good man. Perhaps you will be profited as well as interested. At any rate, the hour I spend in writing of him will be " privileged beyond the common walks of life, quite in the verge of heaven." For as I sit in my silent study, in the still night, and the fire burns low, and the city itself is asleep around me, I call up the memories of my departed friend, and even now, this minute, it seems as though he might step in as he was wont to every day what time he was in the flesh, and had not yet ascended to his Father and my Father. And that reminds me of one interview in the study : to tell of it will be the shortest way to discover the calm, equable, trustful nature of the man. Facts had come to my knowledge, very painful, and per- 60 tREN^US LETTERS. sonally to him distressing, which he ought to know, and which it became my duty to impart to him. I evaded and avoided the unpleasant task, until a sense of duty overcame : and when he came to my study in the evening, I went at it with protracted circumlocution, and after a tedious introduc tion managed at last to lay the skeleton at his feet. Then I paused, expecting to hear some pious ejaculation like a prayer for help : but, to my relief and surprise, he simply said : " Well, I have long since made up my mind not to expend emotion on what cannot be helped.'' That sentence has been like a proverb with me ever since. It is only a paraphrase of the adage, " What can't be cured, must be endured." But it has a little more philosophy in it, and means " don't fret : there are two things never to be wor ried about : things that can be helped, and things that can't be helped. If you can cure them, do so and don't fret : if you can't cure them, fretting only makes matters worse." This is philosophy, Grace comes in and says: "Your heavenly Father careth for these things : his will is wise and kind : let not your heart be troubled." We never made allusion to the matter again. It was as though the skeleton were buried in the darkness of that night, and its burial-place were not known. Eighty years! Fourscore years of usefulnesss, devotion, holy living and active Christian benevolence. For, like his Master, he went about doing good. His power in the minis try was in pastoral work. It is not probable that any church ever had a pastor more nearly perfect than he. He was a good, not a great preacher, except as goodness is often the greats/ greatness. Warm, earnest, drenched with Scripture, and rich Christian experience, his sermons were poured forth from a heart full of tenderness and love, so that every hearer knew the preacher yearned to do him good. Himself a disciple in the school of suffering, taught by the Man of Sorrows, he was a son of consolation to them who mourned. In every household of his charge he ministered in affliction, and his people, especially the children of his peo ple, died in his arms. Just here I could speak of scenes that A PASTOR AND FRIEND. 6 1 he and I will talk over together, when we and ours are sitting on the banks of the river that flows from the throne of the Lamb ! Hallowed memories ! Tears thirty years ago now flowing again, while his are all wiped away by the hand of Infinite Love ! It is not weakness to weep when these memories come, and little fingers of the long-ago-lost fondly play with our heart-strings in the night watches. Jesus wept. And he wept by the grave of one he loved. I would be like my Lord, and if I may not resemble him in aught else, let them say of me, as they said of Jesus, " Behold, how he loved him." Children would stop in their play to take his hand as he passed along the street. And there is nothing in the descrip tion of the village pastor of Goldsmith more beautiful than was daily revealed in the walk and conversation of this good shep herd. He was able to give money to those who had need of it, for his own habits were exceedingly simple, almost severe, and his income ample. It was freely spent upon the poor in his own flock, and in the ends of the world. The father of many orphans, he was as the Lord is to them whom father and mother had left behind when going home to heaven. So have I seen a peaceful meadow stream winding its way among green fields, and trees planted by the water-course; verdure and flower and fruit revealing its life-giving power. It made no noise. It was often hid from sight by the wealth of overhanging branches : but it was a river of water of life to the valley it blessed. Like unto such a stream is the life of my departed friend. This day the garden of the Lord is glad for him : his whole course of 80 years may be traced by the fruit and flower and joy which rose into being along his path. He did not strive nor cry, his voice was not heard in the streets. Others were more gifted with golden speech, and had wider fame among men. But no minister of our day has been an angel of mercy to more hearts : none is wept by more whom he comforted : none has been welcomed by a goodlier company of saints whom he saved, and of them whose angels do always behold the face of my Father. 62 IRENES US LETTERS. How better to be good than to be great ! How much greater than greatness goodness is ! A DREAM OF THE YEAR. " I saw a vision in my sleep, That gave my spirit strength to sweep Adown the gulf of Time !" T. Campbell. We have more dreams awake than when we sleep. A large part of every one's life is passed amid "the stuff that dreams are made of." At times we hardly know whether we have been asleep or not, a vision of past and future appears and then vanishes away. It was in one of those moods between waking and sleep ing, before rising on the morning of the first day of the year, that this vision passed before me, with all the vividness of the sun, and left its impress so that I can tell you what I saw and heard. I was walking on the bank of a deep, broad, silent river, flowing onward toward the sea. The stream was cov ered with vessels of various names and rig; all going with the current ; making progress, some more, some less, but all getting on. Some of these ships were so near me that I could see the men on board, and with a little care I could dis cover the work that each was set to do, from the master to the cabin boy. There was enough for all, and each vessel kept on its own course, when every man did his own work, faithfully and well. There was some bad steering and slov enly handling the sails, and here and there a captain was tipsy and things were out of sorts, and one ship would run into another or get aground ; and I saw that the neglect of any one to do his duty, made mischief that brought trouble to all on board. Before me in the path stood a man whose white hair and A DREAM OF THE YEAR. 63 wrinkles told me of his great age, and even if he had not carried a scythe over his shoulder, I would easily have known him as Father Time. He said to me in firm and man ly tones : " Whither goest thou ?" "With the current," I replied; "all things seem tending to the sea : some go by water, some by land, and I suppose we are all going the same way." " Turn," he said, " and go back with me, on the path thou hast travelled." We reversed our steps, and he spoke to me of the path of human life : it is often called a journey, a pilgrimage : but it should rather be spoken of as a place, a house, a field, a bat tle, a service ; he said it was wrong to think of life as a sort of space or distance between two goals : a race to be run and then over : a voyage to be made and then the port to be en joyed : and as we walked side by side he discoursed to me of the duties of life, of the works that each man has to do, and neglecting which, he makes a failure. We came, in our walk, upon wrecks of vessels stranded and rotten on the shore : by the side of the pathway, and now and then in the very road itself, were the remnants of broken engines, and the scattered members of beautiful machinery and the bones of human beings lying in the grass by the wayside. Puzzled with the sight of these things, not one of which I had noticed when pursuing my journey alone and with the current of the stream, I looked up with wonder to my patriarchal guide and asked : "What are these wrecks that strew the road ?" "Losx OPPORTUNITIES," were the only words that fell from his lips, but they fell as from out of the sky, so far off and so solemn did they sound in my ear. I was silent, awe struck, and anxious, for a faint suspicion came to my mind that this was in part my work, and these ruins were memorials of my neglect, if nothing worse. And I repeated his words in a tone of respectful inquiry : " Lost opportunities ? Whose and what, tell me, my coun sellor and friend." 64 IREN&US LETTERS. He paused in his walk, and removing from his shoulder the scythe, he rested on it, and began : "We have gone back far enough to learn the lesson of the day. The distance we have walked is in time ONE YEAR. The wrecks and ruins we have passed, and those now in sight, are the resolutions made, the purposes formed, the works begun, the chances enjoyed, the means neglected, the mischief done, deeds left unfinished, friendships lost, Sabbaths spoiled, months run to waste, weeks fruitless, days idled away, hours spent in vain : each one of these lost opportuni ties is a wreck and skeleton on the pathway of thy existence. Hadst thou done thy whole duty in this one year over which we have walked, this shattered frame, now helplessly ruined, would have been in beautiful operation, working out a noble mission fof the good of man. Hadst thou stretched out a hand to save this struggling fellow-man, or let him lean on thy shoulder, when he was weak and thou strong for the struggle of life, he would now be by thy side, or if left behind would be praying for thee, as he pressed on toward the mark. You have done well for yourself, but no man liveth to himself, if he live rightly. You may make a long journey and at last rest from your labors, but you will never forget these memorials of lost opportunities that now cry to thee from the ground." I was cut to the heart by these words of reproof, and in my remorse, perhaps inspired by that terrible allusion to the death of Abel, I exclaimed, "AM I MY BROTHER'S KEEPER?" " Certainly thou art," he said, with a calmness that was more severe in contrast with the earnestness of my cry. " The whole world is kin, and thy brother is he unto whom thou canst do a good turn, as both pursue the journey of life. All are parts of one great whole : members of a large family : the strong must bear the burdens of the weak : the tempted are to be shielded : they that are out of the way are to be reclaimed : the sinning, yes, the very wicked, are to be sought and saved." " And shall I have one more year in which to repent me of the past and to do works meet for repentance ?" A DREAM OF THE YEAR. 65 And old Father Time shouldered his scythe, turned him self about, took me by the hand and said, softly, "That is not for thee or me to know. Thy times are in the hands of Him who gave thee life and opportunities. The Present is thine, and of that only art thou sure. Improve the present. With thy might do what thy hand findeth to do. To-mor row never is. Yesterday is gone forever. Now is the accept ed time : behold now is the day of salvation." He was gone, scythe and all : his snow-white beard still shone in my mind, but the vision was past, the sunlight was piercing the crevices of the window-blinds, and the shout of " Happy New Year " announced the advent of another morn. But it was not all a dream. The river flows toward the sea. The vessels, with their freight and the sailors, are borne onward. This pathway is thronged with travellers, brothers and sisters all. The year is to be full of opportunities, golden opportunities, to be useful. In the household lie the best and holiest duties to be done. A cheerful heart, and voice, and countenance, an open hand, a word of blessing when another's heart is weary or in pain, the thousand little tender services, too small to have a name, precious in the eyes of love, are noted in the book that records each cup of cold water a child of Christ receives. By this time the uproar was too great for dozing or medi tation, and changing the robes of night for those of day, we were soon amid the gladdest scenes of the year. Let us hope that it will be ended as happily as it begins. 66 IREN&US LETTERS. DR. SPRING'S PREDICTION. At the funeral of a distinguished citizen of New York, a large number of the clergy were present by special invitation The late Rev. Dr. Spring, pastor of the Brick Church, was one who bore a part in the service. As we were leaving the house to enter the carriages in waiting, he took my arm, for his eyes were dim and his steps uncertain. I assisted him into the carriage, and Dr. De Witt took a seat by his side. Dr. Vermilye entered also, and I was shutting the door when one of them bade me come in. I said, " No, my place is with the younger brethren." This was speedily overruled, and I was seated with these Fathers of the Church. As the procession moved, Dr. Vermilye said to me : " You declined our company because of your youth ; pray, how old art thou ?" I answered : " I am FIFTY-ONE : and you ?" Dr. V. responded, " SIXTY-ONE." We turned to Dr. De Witt and begged to know his age, and he said, " I am SEVENTY-ONE. It was now the patriarch's turn to speak ; we looked our desires to Dr. Spring, and he answered : " If I live until Feb ruary next, I shall be EIGHTY-ONE." Perhaps a more extraordinary coincidence in ages was never ascertained : four men finding themselves in the same carriage, with a decade between the years of their birth : now all of them beyond the half century, and ascending by tens to fourscore. The conversation that ensued was naturally suggested by the discovery we had made, and by the associ ations of advancing years with the occasion that had thrown us together. Dr. Spring, with great preciseness of manner, as though the words were well considered, said to me : " You are now fifty-one years old, and you have the best thirty years of your life before you." " How can that be possible ?" I asked : "at fifty a man be gins to think the best years of his life are past, and the journey onward is only down hill." DR. SPRING'S PREDICTION. 67 "Not at all," replied Dr. Spring: "you will have better health of body and mind : you will do more and better work for God and man in the next thirty years than you have done in the last fifty. I will not live to see it, but mark my words and see if it is not so." The words of the venerable man were to me like those of a prophet. His voice and manner, in the pulpit or out, were as of one sent to speak by authority, and some who sat in his presence sixty years will remember with something like awe his majestic tones and words. He must be more than a com mon man who can stand in one pulpit, in the midst of a great, impulsive, changing commercial city like this, and maintain himself and hold his people more than sixty years ! If a man does not run out in that time, his hearers are very apt to think him exhausted, and to want young blood in the pulpit. Dr. Spring was before his people in thinking of this. And his treatment of the case was so characteristic of human nature that the fact, as I can mention it, will be a hint to pas tors and to congregations. In the year 1849 Dr. Spring came to me in my study, and said : " I want you to help me in finding a colleague in my pulpit and pastoral work. " " A colleague for you" I said with some surprise ; " the need of it is not apparent to me." " That may be," he replied, " but I am now sixty-four years old, and am approaching that time of life when I shall require assistance, and when that time arrives / shall be sure that I do not need it, I wish to secure a colleague in anticipation of that event." This purpose showed the strong, good sense of the man, great foresight, firmness of resolve, and a degree of self- knowledge very rare indeed. We gave ourselves to the task of finding the right man. His people knew nothing of his intention ; and they saw no signs of decay in those splendid powers of body and mind which had so long placed him in the front rank of living preachers. Perhaps they would have resisted his purpose had they known what was going on. 68 IRENES US LETTERS. His trustees voted him an extra sum with which to employ occasional aid at his own discretion, and various preachers were invited to supply his pulpit. No one of them seemed to be the man some perhaps were too great, others too small : the one just right did not appear. And now for the result : five or six years went by, and when the congregation felt that a colleague was desirable, Dr. Spring was in the state of mind that he foresaw in 1849, and was very sure that he did not need one. This is not a condition peculiar to Dr. Spring. Men do not perceive their own mental failures. Often men think they can write as good a sermon or as brilliant an essay, and even a better one, than they ever could, when they are past fruit-bearing. Their friends will not tell them so. They would not believe their friends if they were told. They are more fluent of words, with tongue and pen, than they ever were, and so mistake the number of words for power of thoughts. Dr. Spring's mind did not fail him. He became stone- blind, and the cataract being removed he was restored to sight. The weight of eighty-eight years made " the strong men bow themselves," but his soul was triumphant as it trod the shining way upward to the glory that awaited him. When his limbs could no longer walk the floor, I was with him in his chamber, where he sat upright in his chair, clad in a white flannel robe, with a silk cap on his head : and in all the years of my intercourse I never had so cheery, familiar and entertaining discourse with him. It was discourse indeed, and he delivered the most of it. He told me of his boyish days, his adventures, his loves, his successes, not a word of his trials, and when I had taken leave of him, and was near the door, he called me back to tell me a story of Lyman Beecher and his wife being tipped out of a wagon. As we finally parted, he said : " I wish you would come oftener; do come at least once a week : it will not be long" I never saw him again. What a volume could be made of the "pastors of New York" dead in the last forty years. I saw the sainted Milnor SABBATH AMONG THE HILLS. 69 just after his soul ascended to his Father. He lay in white raiment, on his couch, as on a triumphal car. And the vol ume would be bright with the names of Phillips, Potts and Krebs, Knox and De Witt, Maclay and Somers, McClintock and Durbin, Skinner and Alexander, Bethune, Parker, Asa D. Smith, McElroy, McLeod, McCartee, Janes, Hagenay, Rice, Vinton, Hoge, McLane, Mason, Muhlenberg, and others now on the right hand of God ! SABBATH AMONG THE HILLS. Never do I feel the power and the beauty of God's word and works more than among the hills ! Those familiar pas sages in the Psalms and in the Prophecies come with energy to the mind when the mountains stand around you as they do about the Holy City, and the hills encompass you like the towers and the promises of the Everlasting God. Once a year I make a pilgrimage to the valley where Williams College stands, in Berkshire County, Mass. Of so many in Switzerland, and England, and America have I said, " It is one of the loveliest in the world," that it seems idle to repeat it of another. But if I were to invent a place for a seat of learning, and a school of science and art, a site for a college, I would pile up wooded hills, around green fields, and through the openings among the mountains that shut out the world and support the sky I would have two rivers of living waters, emblems of knowledge and virtue, flowing gently in; uniting within the vale, they should min gle in the midst of a grove ; and then, in one broader and deeper stream, they should flow on through another gateway, with verdant meadows and wild flowers on its banks, into the world to be made gladder and better for its healing and sav ing power. So is this happy valley. It was a beautiful Providence which guided a soldier, who fell in battle with the Indians 7 t IREN&US LETTERS. before the war of our Revolution, to select this spot in the wilderness as the seat of a school, now a College called Wil liams, his own name, and it is quite likely that so long as grass grows and rivers run, and hills stand, and men live and learn, this place will rejoice in the wisdom that ordained his choice, and will call his memory blessed. Here, then, I come once more, on the return of the Col lege Commencement season. A few hours ago I was swelter ing in the heats of the great city. I am sitting in my over coat now, on a piazza, and am very cool, if not comforta ble. The mercury was 90 in the house in town ; it is here about 65, and as it is raining hard, and a tremendous thun der-storm has clarified the atmosphere, the change is so refreshing as to be truly exhilarating. It is a sort of magical transformation that sets one down in such a high valley as this, in the midst of the mountains, so soon and suddenly from the heart of a great city ! And its enjoyments have become so well and widely known, that hundreds who have tastes to appreciate the intellectual festivities, as well as the natural beauties and enjoyments of the region, flock hither at this season, and make a high holiday of it in the early summer. This season we miss some who were wont to be here, but the place is full of guests. EXTRACTS FROM MY DIARY. June 29. Sabbath. Rain. There is no need of saying, "When it rains, let it rain," for when the clouds, with their bosoms full, get in among these hills, they stay, and it keeps on raining with wonderful perseverance. In the forenoon the annual sermon was delivered before the Mills Young Men's Christian Association of the College. The preacher was the Rev. Roswell D. Hitchcock, D.D., Profes sor in the Union Theological Seminary of New York. His text was from the parable of the talents, " He that hath, unto him shall be given," etc. The vein of deep Christian phi losophy running through the discourse imbedded in the mind of young men the great truth of the text that having SABBATH AMONG TH2 HILLS. 71 is using, or the result is losing : that the use of talents increases them, the misuse tends to their destruction, so that the analogies of nature confirm the laws of divine grace. A more practical and important lesson the wisdom of the Great Teacher never taught, for in the womb of it are the embryos of all success in this life and of salvation after. Especially in this muscular-development age, when young men's minds are full of the glory that comes from brawn rather than brain, and from brain rather than heart; when the physical is asserting itself over the intellectual, and both are preferred to the spir itual, it was a capital idea with which Dr. Hitchcock was inspired, to put before these young men in the early period of their education the inseparable connection between the im provement and the enjoyment of the talents God has granted. The peculiar sententiousness, the epigrammatic form of ex pression, the sharp, short and incisive phrase, in which a whole volume of wisdom is concentrated, these are characteristic features of Dr. Hitchcock's way of putting things, and they stick like knives into the memory. The hope would spring up, as he spoke, that under these timely teachings these young men will get impressions that will tell on their entire lives, and bear fruit in ages far beyond the boundaries of time. So influence perpetuates and propagates itself. In lines direct and divergent, mind touches minds, and these others, in many devious courses, till " thoughts that breathe and words that burn" go out into all the earth, unto the ends of the world. In the afternoon President Chadbourne preached the ser mon to the graduating class. He seized upon the pro gramme or curriculum of a finished Christian education as marked out by the Holy Spirit in Peter, who bade those whom he taught to add to their faith virtue, in the old sense of the word, manly courage and excellence, then knowledge, temperance, patience, godliness, brotherly kindness, charity. Each and all of these were illustrated and enforced in such strong and earnest terms as to produce on the mirror of a lucid mind the image of a perfect character : a fully-de veloped, disciplined and furnished man, thoroughly equipped 72 1RENAZUS LETTERS. for the conflict and the service of a human life in an age of active mental and moral forces, when inaction is treason, and to doubt is to be destroyed. Toward evening it is the habit of this College, on the Sab bath preceding Commencement, to meet its friends in the Mission Park, where in 1806, by the shelter of a haystack, five students prayed American missions into being. There a white marble has been set up, with a globe on its summit, and the names of the young men on its face. Around this monument, under the shade of giant trees, and beneath the canopy of the sky, we sing the songs of missionary devotion, listen to rousing words, and pray for a fresh baptism of the spirit of the men who made this spot immortal in the mem ory of the Church. In this out-of-door, under the trees meeting, some years ago, I met the Hon. James A. Garfield for the first time, and heard his voice in the cause of Christian missions. To-day the ground was so wet with recent rain, that we met in the house of God, made with hands, instead of the groves, "his first temple." The venerable ex- Presi dent, Mark Hopkins, presided, and spoke with vigor that showed the fire of Christian love brightens as it nears its consummation in joys supernal : Dr. Hitchcock threw his soul into the communion, and talked with us of the Christ in conscious Christian aggression on a world to be saved : Dr. R. R. Booth, of New York city, a graduate of this Col lege in the class of 1849, stirred all hearts with a fervid appeal that the birthplace of American missions might always be filled and be glorified by the spirit of them whose works had in 72 years made the Gospel to surround the globe. Later in the evening the Alumni spent an hour in the chapel praying together, Professor Perry presiding. And so closed the day : a great day : a day of high intellectual and spiritual power, when minds and hearts of educated, think ing men rose into the loftier ranges of Christian enjoyment, and on the mount of vision said one to another, " It is good to be here." A SERVICE OF SONG. 73 A SERVICE OF SONG. It was in the village of Litchfield, Conn., where and when we met of a Sabbath evening for a service of song. Services of praise or song are frequent, consisting, for the most part, in singing miscellaneous hymns, one after another, with no special relation to each other, or to any spe cific point of doctrine or duty. An hour may thus be passed with delight, but without much profit beyond the enjoyment of the song. Our service contemplated something more. And, having frequently introduced the same thing into the parlor, at thronged watering-places on Sabbath evening, to the great satisfaction of the guests, who enter into it with zest, fervor and spirit, I am quite willing to think the plan has some merit of its own to commend it. The idea is to make the singing of successive hymns answer the higher purpose of praising God, while it illustrates, enforces and tenderly impresses religious truth on the hearts of those who sing and hear. To this end, a portion of Scripture is selected and as many hymns arranged as can be conveniently sung within the time allowed, and these hymns are to be specifically adapted to apply the portion of divine truth. If the congregation has a choir the hymns may be given to it for rehearsal, and in any case it is desirable that no time be lost in " getting ready to sing" after the hymn is announced and read. But the service will be more happily exhibited by giving the programme as we conducted it at Litchfield. The subject and the order may be varied to meet the taste and habits of the people. HYMN. " Come let us join our cheerful songs, With angels round the throne : Ten thousand thousand are their tongues, But all their joys are one." 74 IREN&US LETTERS. PRAYER. Reading the Scriptures: Matt, xi : 25-30. The words on which our minds will dwell this evening are these : " Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." REST is the theme. If, on the stillness of this Sabbath evening air, a voice should come down to us from the lips that spake as never man spake, no sweeter words than these could fall upon the ears of listening men. Rest. I will give you REST. Wearied, worn and ready to sink beneath the heat and burdens of the day, we long for rest. It is found in the blessed Gospel which brings immortality to light. First, let us meditate the blessedness of rest on the Christian Sabbath. It comes to us in the midst of the cares, toils and even the pursuit of pleasures, and every heart welcomes its holy, peaceful, refreshing presence. Tired nature's sweet restorer, more than sleep. The whole earth rejoices in its rest. The beasts of burden rest. Is it fancy that the fields and flowers, the sun shine and meadow streams are sweeter and brighter when the Sabbath comes ? Let us sing two or three songs of the Sabbath rest : " Welcome sweet day of rest, That saw the Lord arise ; Welcome to this reviving- breast, And these rejoicing eyes." " Thine earthly Sabbaths, Lord, we love, But there's a nobler rest above." And the words of the Saviour were an invitation to rest in him. Come unto me, and I will give you rest : rest from the weary load of sorrow and of sin : we are all sinners and therefore we are all sufferers. Every heart knoweth its own bitterness, and there is none that has escaped the common lot. Many wear the tokens of sorrow : and many an aching heart hangs out no signal of distress. Unto you who feel sin an evil and bitter thing, and would find peace of con- A SERVICE OF SONG. 75 science, sweet forgiveness, the Saviour says, " Come unto me." Unto you who are bowing down under sorrows that no loving words of human sympathy can assuage, the mes sage of the healer and the comforter conies in these words of divine compassion : " I will give you rest." Come and cast all your care on him : take him as your Saviour from sin : as the rock of your salvation : the consolation and joy of your hearts, while we sing : " Sweet the moments, rich in blessing, Which before the cross I spend, Life and health and peace possessing From the sinner's dying friend. " Here I'll sit forever viewing Mercy's streams in streams of blood ; Precious drops, my soul bedewing, Plead and claim my peace with God." " Just as I am, without one plea But that thy blood was shed for me, And that thou bid'st me come to thee, ^ O Lamb of God, I come 1 ' Just as I am, and waiting not To rid my soul of one dark blot, To thee, whose blood can cleanse each spot, O Lamb of God, I come !" *' Come, ye disconsolate, where'er ye languish, Come ! at God's altar fervently kneel ; Here bring your wounded hearts, here tell your anguish ! Earth has no sorrow that Heaven cannot heal 1 " Joy of the desolate, Light of the straying, Hope, when all others die, fadeless and pure, Here speaks the Comforter, in God's name saying, " Earth has no sorrow that Heaven cannot cure 1" " Jesus, pitying Saviour, hear me ; Draw thou near me ; Turn thee, Lord, in grace to me, For thou knowest all my sorrow ; Night and morrow Doth my cry go up to thee. 76 tltEN&US LETTERS. " Peace I cannot find : oh, take me, Lord, and make me From the yoke of evil free ; Calm this longing never-sleeping, Still my weeping, Grant me hope once more in thee. " Here I bring my will, oh take it ; Thine, Lord, make it ; Calm this troubled heart of mine : In thy strength I too may conquer ; Wait no longer ; Show in me thy grace divine. And then conies REST in Heaven : O blessed rest : the rest that remains : infinite, eternal rest : rest in God. Eye hath not seen, ear hath not heard what waits for them who enter into that rest. The prophets of old : the poets of all time : dying saints : have had visions of that rest, and their songs of praise have helped to lift us heavenward, while wrestling and toiling here below. Let us sing : " Jerusalem, my happy home, Name ever dear to me, When shall my labors have an end In joy and peace and thee." And when we had sung two or three hymns of heaven, of which there are so many so precious that we never weary of them, I read some of the noblest stanzas of old Latin hymns, which have come along down the ages, getting strength, beauty and glory as they came: the faith and hope and blood of successive saints, martyrs and confessors ringing in their notes of triumphant harmony : " For thee, O dear, dear country, Mine eyes their vigils keep ; For very love, beholding Thy happy name, they weep. The mention of thy glory Is unction to the breast, And medicine in sickness, And love, and life, and rest. A SERVICE OF SONG. " O one, O only mansion ! O paradise of joy ! Where tears are ever banished, And smiles have no alloy. " Thou hast no shore, fair ocean ! Thou hast no time, bright day ! Dear fountain of refreshment To pilgrims far away ! Upon the Rock of Ages They raise the holy tower ; Thine is the victor's laurel, And thine the golden dower ! " Jerusalem, the Golden, With milk and honey blest, Beneath thy contemplation Sink heart and voice opprest. I know not, oh, I know not, What social joys are there ! What radiancy of glory, What light beyond compare. " And when I fain would sing them, My spirit fails and faints ; And vainly would it image The assembly of the saints. " They stand, those halls of Syon, Conjubilant with songf And bright with many an angel, And all the martyr-throng ; The Prince is ever in them, The daylight is serene ; The pastures of the blessed Are decked in glorious sheen. " There is the throne of David, And there, from care released, The song of them that triumph, The shout of them that feast ; And they who, with their Leader, Have conquered in the fight, For ever, and for ever, Are clad in robes of white ! LETTERS. " O holy, placid harp-notes Of that eternal hymn ! O sacred, sweet refection, And peace of seraphim 1 " Oh, none can tell thy bulwarks, How gloriously they rise ! Oh, none can tell thy capitals Of beautiful device ! Thy loveliness oppresses All human thought and heart ; And none, O Peace, O Syon, Can sing thee as thou art ! " O fields that know no sorrow I O state that fears no strife ! O princely bowers ! O land of flowers ! O home, and realm of life !" And we closed the service with the appropriate doxology : " Hallelujah to the Lamb who hath purchased our pardon, We'll praise him again when we pass over Jordan." The interest certainly increased every moment, as the ser vice advanced : the people catching its intent, joining with growing emotions in the songs, as they gave expression to the longing desires of every living heart. So many afterwards asked for repetition of the service, it was evident that it was not in vain. Any other theme might be chosen and developed in the same way; as many hymns being sung under each division as the time would permit. An hour and a half will fly away in such a delightful exercise, and many an ardent worshipper will then exclaim : 11 My willing soul would Stay In such a frame as this : And sit and sing herself away To everlasting bliss." CHILDREN AND THE CHURCH. 79 CHILDREN AND THE CHURCH. The Hon. William E. Dodge stirred the Philadelphia Chris tians a few nights ago with some plain but very timely words. He was on the platform in a great meeting gathered to pro mote a General Council of Presbyterians, to be held in the City of Brotherly Love. Mr. Dodge told them that the chil dren of the Church are systematically taught to neglect the Church, and while the clergy and others are laying plans to gather their great men in council from all parts of the world, it would be well to look into a little matter in their own fami lies and at their church doors. Mr. Dodge referred to the practice now almost universal of allowing the children to attend the Sunday-school, and then to be absent from the church. His remarks on this habit, which he condemned most earnestly, were loudly applauded, the people being convicted in their own conscience, as the men of Jerusalem were when Jesus said, " He that is without sin among you let him cast the first stone." I was going to church last Sabbath morning, and as I approached it, a procession, or rather a throng of children, not infants, but boys and girls of ten and twelve years of age, with books and papers in hand, were pouring out of the lec ture and Sunday-school room, and going down street, away from the church ! Had they been suddenly seized with ill ness, so that it was necessary for them to get home and into bed? Had the labors of the school been so severe that the poor things were exhausted, and must find rest and recrea tion without delay ? Mr. Dodge thought the children went home and spent the day in reading Sunday-school books, a large part of which, he said, were not fit to be read on Sunday or any other day. If they do not spend the day at home, it is better than I fear, for in the case of the boys it is often true that the Sabbath is made a play-day, and the Sunday-school is the only hour of confinement to which they submit. But it is not about the way in which the children spend the 86 IREN&US LETTERS. Sabbath that I am now writing. It is the fact that they do not attend church with their parents regularly, sitting in the same pew, and receiving the regular instruction of the sanctuary. The time was when this was the uniform, steady and excellent habit of all Christian families. It is not so now. It ought to be so again. The Sunday-school has led to the change for the worse. It should now lead the way in a reform. Were I the pastor of a church in which this evil prevailed, I would break it up in two ways : first, by so regulating the Sunday-school that it should not hinder but should posi tively help the children to attend the church service : and, secondly, by so enlightening the darkness of the parental mind that the sin and misery of the present habit should appear to the most benighted. I would show them that the church, the ordinances of God's house, the regular worship in the sanctuary, will prove to be more useful in the forma tion of character, and in training for usefulness and heaven, than the Sunday-school can be: that the church is the home for the soul of the child as well as for the parent, and for its power no human substitute has yet been invented : that the habit of church worship should be formed in early child hood, and no means of pleasing or profiting the young are to be compared with it, or put in the place of it : and if but one, the church or the school, can be enjoyed, the church is to be prized and the school abandoned. This is the plain truth, and that is what we want. Then there are two other matters to be attended to : the Sunday-school must not be held at such an hour as to make it tedious or trying for the children to go to church. It is quite likely that the modern contrivances for making Sunday- schools amusing have given them a distaste for the more solemn services of the sanctuary. If so, the amusement is a sin. The school should feed the church. Children ought to be led by one into the other : exposed to the preaching of the Gospel, taught the ways of God's house, and brought up under its influence, with all its hallowed and elevating influences. To make this service attractive to children, it may be that CHILDREN AND THE CHURCH. 8i the preaching of the present day may have to be modified in some pulpits. But to be modified it need not be babyfied. The namby-pamby twaddle talked to children, and called "children's preaching," is just about as palatable to them when they are old enough to go to Sunday-school as pap is to a boy of ten. Nothing is more attractive to a child of Christian parents than the Bible ; itself a wonderful picture and story book, more wonderful than all others together; and he is a great preacher to parents who will hold up these pictures and stories to the entranced attention of the young. Dr. Bevan says that in London he was wont to devote a part of each morning service to the special wants of the chil dren, and so made them feel that they were an important part of the congregation. Mr. Dodge was so thoroughly applauded by his Philadelphia hearers that he was sure they knew the state of things there to be just as bad as it is here in New York. And now I have a letter from a pastor in Bal timore, who tells me how it is in that fair city. He writes : ' ' The difficulty with us and it is a very serious one is that children are not brought to church as formerly, and as they certainly should be. It is a painful sight to see the large proportion of children who, at the close of the morning-Sabbath school, instead of going into church, go home ; and what renders the evil more alarming is that parents not only seem to make no effort to arrest the practice, but approve it ; or, to say the least, apologize. The plea is that to go to Sabbath -school, and then to church, is too much for children; the confinement being so long as to prove neither healthful physically or religiously. Some even go so far as to contend that the Sab bath-school answers all the same as church-going, and is perhaps better adapted for children. 1 ' Now as to the matter of physical endurance, is the present race of chil dren more feeble and effeminate than were their fathers and mothers ? The latter were trained to go to church as punctually as to Sabbath-school ; and none of them were probably the worse, but very much the better for so doing. The plea is only one of the indications of the increasing flabbiness of the piety of our day. " And as to substituting the Sabbath-school for the sanctuary, what will be the effect of this upon the Church of the future ? On Solomon's prin ciple that the training of the child determines the character of the man, what will be the proportion of church-goers in another generation ? The 82 IREMMUS LETTERS. New York Observer of forty or fifty years hence will have to speak even more urgently than in the recent editorial on the ' Falling off of Church- going.' The Great Enemy does his work b'ttle by little, perhaps, but he does it ; and whilst parents, church officers, and possibly pastors, are sleep ing on this subject, the tares are being sown. From different and widely separated portions of our country the writer learns that the evil exists, and is, perhaps, increasing. Is it not time to call a halt ? Take the children to church. L." What more can I say than unto you has been said ? Here is an evil that is sore under the sun : in the Sunday-school and the Church : every teacher has a duty in the matter and every parent and pastor. Their combined action can work a speedy reform. THE SHAKERS OF CANTERBURY. Some seven or eight miles south of the spot where I am now writing, and in full view from the hill-top on which our farm and farm-house repose, is the Shaker village in Canter bury, N. H. We drove over there yesterday. So much romance, sentiment and poetry have been invested in these Shaker communities, that one is hardly prepared for the hard, practical work-a-day communities they are, when he comes to see them. They are related to the Dervishes of Turkey, the Monks of Italy and the Saints of the Desert. One touch of madness makes them all akin: the blunder that to be outside of duty is doing it : that God is pleased with those who shirk his precepts, and set up their own vagaries in place of his will. Freeman, the Pocasset Advent- ist, slew his little daughter under a mistaken idea of duty: the Shakers sacrifice the husband, wife, father and mother, under an error as wild and as fatal as the fanatic of Cape Cod has made. Shaker villages are substantially alike. A few large, barn- like houses, pierced with many windows and a few doors, a meeting-house, shops, and barns for the crops and cattle, all THE SHAKERS OF CANTERBURY. 83 near together, no ornament, no architectural taste, nothing to please or to offend the eye, but rigid lines, perfect cleanli ness and order, these are the principal features of the settle ments. We drove up to a door over which was the sign " Trustees' Office." Our party was large fourteen and we were look ing for something like a hotel, but there was nothing to be found more public than this. We were welcomed at the door by a neatly-attired and prim Sister, who pleasantly invited us in, and gave us seats in the reception-room. Another sister joined her, both of them bright, smiling, cheerful women, and, without waiting to be asked, they gave us ice-water, and also mint water, a pleasant beverage. Their kind attentions, especially to the ladies of the party, were grateful in their simplicity. Presently Elders Blinn and Kames entered and gave us a cordial welcome. Their cheer ful, animated conversation, the interest they showed in the topics of the day, and their readiness to make us acquainted with their mode of life, won upon our regard, and we felt that we were with friends. Elder Blinn invited us to walk through the village, the houses and barns. Most of the company followed him in what proved to be a pleasant and entertaining stroll. The stalls for the cows, which were in the milking-way at that hour, were scrupulously clean. The milk-maids, mostly young, did not take kindly to the exhibition, and rather hid their faces under cover of the cows. The cows knew their own stalls, over each of which was the name of its tenant. The school room was supplied with all modern improvements, but school was out for the day. The shops were models of neatness and convenience ; a place for everything, and everything in its place, being evidently the law of the house. Machinery and factories have cheapened the production of many articles which the Shakers once made, so that their line of business is much restricted. But they do nothing which they do not intend to do well, and their work in the dairy, the garden, the field or the house, is honestly done and commands its price. Elder Kames remained with me while the others surveyed 84 1KZN&US LETTERS. the village, which, being as nearly like other Shaker villages as one pea is like another, was not to me a novelty. Our conversation ran along : /. How many persons have you now in your community? Elder K. About one hundred and fifty. In years past the number has been much larger, as many as three hundred at one time. /. Then your numbers rather diminish than increase. Do you have frequent accessions to your connection ? Elder K. Nearly every month in the year persons come who wish to join. But they are mostly broken-down, dis gusted and discouraged people, who think it a sort of asylum for played-out parties they soon get tired of it and pass on. We receive none as members until they show that they understand our principles and intelligently adopt them. Even our own members are not restrained when they insist upon going. If they have brought property into the com munity, they are paid what is just if they leave, and no one is sent away empty. /. How then are your numbers recruited, as you do not marry, and some must die? Elder K. Children are brought to us by their parents and guardians, and we bring them up in our ways. When they have reached mature years, and are disposed to do so, they join by signing the covenant. The boys are less inclined than girls are to fall in with us. Boys are more restless, ambitious, and disposed to go into the world. Hence we always have a much larger number of women than of men in the community. /. You are a corporation, I suppose, so that you can hold your property and people under law? Elder K. Nay, we are not incorporated : our bond is a voluntary covenant by which the management is confided to trustees, in whose name the property is held and all business is done. We have between three and four thousand acres of land here, and a farm in the State of New York, where we raise wheat and sell it, and we buy our flour here, for this is not a wheat-growing region. We have no trouble from THE SHAKERS OF CANTERBURY. 8$ the want of a legal charter, and it is not the custom of our people to put themselves into such a relation to the State. /. You have a post-office under the General Government, I noticed as I came in ; is that for your own convenience, or the public generally? Elder K. For all who choose to use it. Our rules allow families of parents and children to live near us in a degree of relation with the Society, but they manage their own tem poral concerns : parents are required to be kind and dutiful to each other, to bring up their children in a godly manner, and manage their property wisely, and so long as they con tinue to conform to the religious faith and principles of the Society they can stay, and no longer. Here they can enjoy spiritual privileges and live away from the world, while they preserve their own domestic relations. /. This feature of Shakerism is quite new to me : how do you train the children given to you by their parents ? Elder K. A good common school education is given them, and if any one discovers genius and special aptness to learn, he is provided with the best instruction in higher branches of knowledge. They are all taught in the Holy Scriptures, particularly the life and lessons of Christ and the apostles. At this point in our conversation, Elder Blinn returned with the party of visitors, and in reply to some inquiries which I did not make, he went into an explanation of the religious doctrine of the Shakers. This is as unintelligible as the mysticism of the Buddhists, or the transcendentalism of Emerson. The priestess of Shakerism was a woman, Ann Lee, who was born in England, and coming to this country, had a following of believers who formed a Community near Sche- nectady, N. Y., where she died. The sect discards the mar riage and parental relation, leads a life of isolation from the world, men and women living side by side, in all the gentle relations except the dearest and sweetest, refusing to obey the first command that God gave to his creatures : thus enacting rebellion bylaw as the basis of their Society. What is their idea of the Heavenly Father ? 86 JREN&US LETTERS. They teach that God exists in a twofold nature, male and female, and manifests himself in the creation of the sexes in "his own likeness." Jesus, the Son of God, was the male manifestation of the Fatherhood, and in these latter days Ann Lee was born as the revelation of the Motherhood of God, and so we have in Shakerism a religion that enjoys all the communications of the Dual Deity in whom we live. They find passages of the Bible which they hold to favor this unintelligible statement. They superadd a pure Chris tian system of practical duty in which the moral law is fully enforced and a life of simple godliness is inculcated. So far as the knowledge and belief of their friends and enemies extend, they are true to their principles, upright in their deportment, honest in their dealings with the world, and the breath of scandal or suspicion of vice among themselves has never sullied their good name. This is a noble record. Such a people cannot be very numerous in this world, for very obvious reasons. There are eighteen communities of them in the United States, nine being in New England, three in the State of New York, four in Ohio, and two in Kentucky. As some of these communities are very small, it is not prob able that they number in all more than 2500 members in the whole country. It is not quite a hundred years since Ann Lee died, the mother of Shakers, and another hundred years will not see the race more numerous than it is now. It is more likely to die out than to grow. Elder Blinn put into my hands the printed programme of their next Sunday service, to consist chiefly of singing. The world's people are welcomed, and seats are provided for them. Dancing, or a measured march, is a frequent part of the service, which is conducted with deliberation and without enthusiasm. Quietness and self-control are cardinal beauties of the Shaker system. We left our kind friends with mutual expressions of regard. Grateful to them for their kindness, we drove homeward in the cool of a lovely summer evening, taking Loudon Ridge, Jones' Mill and Shell-Camp Lake in the way. The moon stood over the mountains in glory indescribable, her silvery MINISTERS' PAY IN OLD TIMES. 87 sheen clothing woods and waters, meadows and hillsides. So still, so calm, so pure, perhaps all the more so because we brought such elements with us from Shaker Village ; but as the sound of a steam-engine on rail or river has never yet disturbed the serene repose of this sequestered vale, we could for the moment enjoy the heavens and the earth as if they were summarily comprehended in the town of Oilman- ton. MINISTERS' PAY IN OLD TIMES. Isaac Smith was the first settled minister in Gilmanton, New Hampshire. The town had "hired a preacher " before, and William Parsons had been with the people some ten years, being hired from year to year. But in 1774 they called Mr. Smith after he had been well tested by preaching some months in Jotham Oilman's barn. A town meeting was then held, and it was voted to give Isaac Smith a call to become the settled minister, and to give him ^50, lawful money, for his salary the first year, increasing ^5 yearly until it became _75, which was to remain his full salary annually so long as he continued in the ministry, he reserving three Sabbaths each year to visit his friends. The town also voted to give him ^75 toward hfs settlement if he accepted the call, one third in money, and two thirds in labor and materials toward his house when he builds. But there was one more point to be cleared up before he could see his way to accept the call, and another town meet ing was called, when it was voted that " Mr. Smith's whole salary should be continued to him in sickness, if necessary." This form of expression was derived from his own letter of acceptance, in which he called their attention to the fact that no provision was made for him in case of his sickness, and he said he should expect them to pay him his full salary or " such a part of it as shall be judged a competent 88 IREN^EUS LETTERS. support by disinterested persons." To this they agreed, and he was settled Nov. 30, 1774. Three several and distinct provisions are made here that are worth being noted in these later days on which the end of the world has come. 1. Mr. Smith was manifestly settled for life. His salary was to be continued " so long as he continued in the min istry." They were not bound to pay him unless he continued to be a minister. If he became unsound in the faith, or immoral in life, the same men who put him into the min istry could put him out, and the people would be released from the contract. But so long as he lived in the ministry they were bound to support him. 2. They were to support him whether he could preach or not. If sickness overtook him, or the infirmities of old age came on, they were not to turn him out like a superannuated horse to starve on the common. This contract they carried out, and having labored with them forty-three years, he died among them at the age of 73 ; and they built him a tomb. 3. The people at the outset, and before he was settled, voted in the terms of the call that he might take an annual recess or vacation of three weeks. That is a fact worth looking at a moment. It is not a modern invention this shutting up the church for successive Sabbaths while the minister goes aside awhile for rest. Call it a time to go and visit his friends, or to go fishing, or to the mountains, as long ago as before the Revolution, which is our line of demar cation between ancient and modern, the good people of New England of Gilmanton at least gave and the minister took a vacation. It was good for him and it was good for them. It is no new thing. And there is no evil in it. In the country a house of worship is not closed because the preacher is absent. We used to call it a " deacon's meeting " when an elder or deacon led the service. At such a meeting in my own church, one of the elders took the desk, and, opening the hymn book, said : " Our pastor is absent : let us sing to his praise the 94th psalm." At such services the prayers were offered by the praying men, and a printed sermon MINISTERS' PA Y IN OLD TIMES. 89 was read aloud by some one selected for the purpose. This good practice is still pursued in many places. Our city churches may unite, two or three, in such a service, or they may readily find temporary supplies in the pastor's absence. It is not true that preaching is the only object for which a church is opened, Nor is it the chief purpose. The wor ship of God is the service, and the preaching is part of it, or an aid to it. Our Protestant ancestors swung away from this truth when they preferred to call God's house a " meeting house." That is not a bad name for it, if its meaning is that there they meet God and one another. But if it be used as a rendezvous simply, where people meet to hear a sermon, then the true idea of "divine service " is repudiated. All of which means that the minister is not necessary to public, acceptable and profitable worship. His work is arduous, and it is for his profit and that of the people that he take a vacation, "to visit his friends," or to go into the woods or to the sea-side or across the sea. But the people are not deprived of the privilege nor released from the duty of pub lic worship because the preacher is gone away. He is not a priest. He is a presbyter, an elder, a teacher. He offers no sacrifice as the Jewish priest did, and as the Romanist pre tends to. Once for all our Great High Priest made atone ment. There is no more sacrifice for sin. It is right for ministers to retire for a season : it is wrong for people to neglect public worship because there is to be no preaching. But we must get back to Gilmanton and their pastor, Isaac Smith. He was settled in 1774, and for many years afterwards things went on smoothly. By and by other denominations began to take root and grow, where the Congregational ists had been the "standing order." The people became slack in paying their minister what they had promised, and he took the law on them. They had made the contract when they were in the capacity of a town ; now it had come to pass that they were only one of the churches in the town. They appointed a committee to defend the suit or to settle it with Mr, Smith. They settled with him. Many thought 90 IREN&US LETTERS, he was hard on them, but as he asked only what he had a right to demand, all sensible people approved of his course, and he retained the respect of the community to the end. The large and handsome house in which he lived and died is now the abode of bats and owls. Great shade trees stand in the front yard, and the ancient shrubbery, vines and flowers, untended, grow in luxuriant disorder, outliving the genera tions of men. DR. MURRAY: BISHOP HUGHES. The sad and sudden death of Thomas Chalmers Murray revives the memory of his father, one of the warmest friends of my life. Not many years ago Nicholas Murray, " Kirwan," was the most popular and perhaps the most useful writer in the columns of the New York Observer. I cannot think of him without a smile on my heart, even in sadness on the death of a noble young man, his well-beloved son, whom I knew in his infancy. The first time that Dr. Murray came to my house he had with him a beautiful boy nine years old ; shortly afterward the child sickened and died. I hastened to his home. In the hall he met me, and fell on my neck and wailed in the anguish of a strong man bowed with great grief. Six times the hand of his Heavenly Father put this bitter cup to the loving father's lips. That was sorrow piled on sorrow : clouds returning after the rain : yet was his great soul strong in God. The prevailing feature of his character, by which he was better known than any other, was his overflowing, genial, hearty good-humor. As he made his mark on the times, and commanded wide respect in the world and the Church, it is to the honor of religion that his walk and his conversation compelled all men who met him to know that the highest type of the Christian is reflected in the cheerful, useful man. When he was called to Elizabethtown, one man only did DR. MURRAY: BISHOP HUGHES. 91 not concur in the cordial invitation. After the pastor was settled, and had been preaching some weeks, the dissatisfied parishioner said to him : " Mr. Murray, I hope you understand that I have nothing against you personally, but I do not like your preaching." " Well, I agree with you perfectly," said the pastor ; "I do not think much of it myself." The man was so palpably met by this remark, that he gave in on the spot, and they were the best of friends ever after. Both of his parents were Irish Roman Catholics. Many a time in his childhood he had crept on his knees into a darkened room in his father's house to confess his sins to a priest, and the nonsense, inconsistency and absurdity of the system of religion in which he was instructed appeared to him in his childhood. When he came to this country, and fell under better influences, he became intelligently a con verted man. I was walking with him one day, when he related the experiences of his early life, and the facts that impressed his young mind with the folly of the Roman religion. Our walk ended, and as we put our feet on the doorstep of my house, I said to him : " Write this all out, and let us print it." He had not thought of it, but struck by the suggestion, he encouraged me to believe that he would. This was the origin of the " KIRWAN LETTERS." He addressed them to Bishop Hughes, like himself a native-born Irishman. They were printed weekly in the New York Observer, the first number appearing February 6, 1847. They made a greater excitement than any series of papers in the religious press of our times. They were read by Romanists as well as Protest ants. Meetings were held weekly in this city attended by Romanists, when one of these letters was read and discussed. The truth of all the facts was obvious to all who heard. They knew how it was themselves. They had been there. The wit of the letters was Irish wit, and they relished it as they do potheen at home and whiskey here. Bishop Hughes was bothered immensely. On all hands he was challenged to answer them. Finally he was goaded into the ring. He 9* IRENES US LETTERS. began a series of letters in reply, but in the midst of them he was called to Halifax ! This was handled cleverly by Kir- wan in a second series, in which he pursued the subject and the Bishop with a vigor that was almost ferocious. It was impossible to answer him. If any one was equal to that task Bishop Hughes was. He was head and shoulders above any man of his sect in this country. And he was witty as well as wise. The New England Society invited him to their annual dinner. Many thought it an outrage to ask him. But he paid them off better than their critics could have done, telling them that his sensations on being there were like those of Pat : riding home drunk in his cart he got sound asleep : some wags stopped his horse, and took him away, leaving Pat to his dreams in the cart. Waking in the morn ing and rubbing his eyes, with a dim memory of the night before, he says : " Be I Pat, or be I not ? If I am Pat, I've lost a horse ; if I be not Pat, I have found a cart." The Bishop's audience laughed, of course ; but it was a modified mirth, that came very near the other thing. Bishop Hughes rarely had the worst of it in debate or dinner-table talk. A new New York lawyer rather got him once. It was in those good old virtuous days we hear so much of, when the Common Council frequently gave great dinners at the city's expense, and they were usually given on Blackwell's Island, in the midst of the criminals and paupers who are there lodged and fed. At one of these dinners Bishop Hughes was a guest, and he had spoken of his deep interest in the people there confined. N. B. Blunt, Esq., rose and proposed a toast: " Bishop Hughes, the chief pastor of this Island !" Then, as now, the Bishop's people furnished the " larger half" of the inhabitants; members confirmed in the church in their youth and now doubly confirmed in pauperism and crime. It was so then, is now, and always will be, until the second reformation. Dr. Murray saw the relations of Roman ism to the poverty, vice and misery of the people, and his letters brought these truths so fearfully to the sunlight as to startle the public mind. When the first series of those let- DR. MURRAY: BISHOP HUGHES. 93 ters was finished, I took them to Mr. John F. Trow, who printed them in a little book which could be sold for ten or fifteen cents, and thousands on thousands of them were sold. They had already become famous in other lands. In Ireland they were immediately reprinted with notes, by the late Dr. S. O. Edgar, author of " Edgar's Variations of Popery." They went in Ireland like wild-fire. In districts where Scriptural schools were enjoyed the Roman Catholics read these letters eagerly. And many believed when they read. They were translated into the French and German languages, and then in the East they were rendered by the missionaries into Oriental tongues, until their lines went out into all the earth. It was not denied that Nicholas Murray was the<*uthor. His signature was borrowed from an Irish preacher famous once, and of whom a very entertaining sketch might be made. But there were many little incidents in the letters that revealed the authorship, and the pastor of Elizabeth became suddenly as famous in this country as Goldsmith or the other Smith whose first name was Sidney, were in their time. He was sent for everywhere to preach. He was not an orator, and those who for the first time heard him missed the brilliant sparkles of that keen wit and broad humor which illumined his letters. But I have seen the old Broadway Tabernacle packed and overflowing by eager multitudes thrilled by the lofty, burning and mighty words of truth with which he denounced the great anti-Christian rebellion of Rome. In the height of this sudden popularity he took his seat in the General Assembly at Pittsburgh in 1849. Named for the Moderator's chair, no one was thought of in competition with him, and he was elected by acclamation. I had strong hope that his son, who bore the name of Scotland's greatest preacher, Thomas Chalmers, would per petuate his father's fame and usefulness. Like his father, he was a graduate of Williams College, the one in the year 1826, the other in 1869. Displaying a fine taste and great facility in the acquisition of languages, he became a remarkable linguist, and was filling such a chair in the young but already 94 IRENMUS LETTERS. celebrated Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, when he was called to die in the very spring of his life, and is now laid by the side of his father and mother in the old cemetery of the First church of Elizabeth. While the helm of the Universe is held by Infinite Wisdom, Love and Power, I have not the shade of a doubt that ALL is WELL. But there are many things hard io be understood, and I am glad to believe that what we know not now we shall hereafter. Dr. Sprague came home to find on his table a telegram saying, DR. MURRAY DIED LAST NIGHT. It was like the fall of a thunderbolt. The same bolt fell on me and I was stunned. He was not old when he died with the battle- harness on, but he cried, " My work is done," and fell into the arrps of death. And now his son, in the morning, full of promise and hope, is taken away ! The more who die, the more for them to do who live. Let us put on the whole armor of God : fight the good fight : be ready always to be offered, and so much the more as we see the day approaching. TWO HOURS IN COURT. An errand of mercy led me into the Court of General Ses sions, Judge Cowing on the bench. Mr. Russell, the Assist ant District- Attorney, was so kind as to bring me within the bar, and give me a seat where I could see, hear and apprehend what was going on. The room was filled with a motley crowd ; most of the people were friends of prisoners, witnesses summoned, jurors, or parties interested in the cases to be heard. No trial of great public interest was on hand, and the company was there fore only the daily gathering in this hall of justice. Mr. Rus sell had the calendar of cases in his hand, a long and fearful list, and as he called one after another, the lawyer in behalf of the prisoner came forward, and he and Mr. Russell arranged for its disposal. They were all criminal cases. But one class of lawyers appeared, and only three of them in all the TWO HOURS IN COURT. * 95 twenty or more cases. These were lawyers whose names are familiar in police reports, men employed by criminals, and who have made large wealth, as well as a certain reputation, by their practice in these courts. Yet all the criminals wore badges of poverty. This was something to think of. They could find money to make lawyers rich, but they were very poor themselves. There were no old criminals. It was dread ful to observe the youth of the prisoners, male and female. With only one or two exceptions, they were under twenty years of age. Three young roughs stood up before the Judge, pleaded guilty to a charge of assaulting an officer, and one of them made a little set speech in extenuation of their offence. They were sent to prison for three months, and went off as unaffected as if they had been dismissed from school. Two women were arraigned for stealing; coarse, hardened, vulgar creatures; they confessed their crimes and went up for six months. A tall, angular, ugly-looking woman was put to the bar. " A professional pickpocket," Mr. Russell said to me, as she stood up. One of her friends brought to her a three-year- old child, which she took in her arms, and pleading guilty, began to cry fearfully, if not tearfully. When she was sen tenced to prison the cries were redoubled and the child clung around her neck, resisting the efforts of the officer to take it off. But she was obliged to part with it, I think it was a baby borrowed for the occasion, and she disappeared. So far every one and I have mentioned but a few had confessed, and there was no need of a trial. But the pressure of cases was so great, and such was the variety of circum stances to be looked into, even when the parties pleaded guilty, that I said to Mr. Russell : " I wonder you do not go crazy : how it is possible to carry all these matters in mind, and be ready to speak and act intelligently in each case, passes my comprehension." I admired his patience, humanity, self-control, and judg ment, but had no wish to change places with him. Judge Cowing seemed to be the right man in the right place. Calm, judicial, prompt, blending the kinder feelings 96 IREN&US LETTERS. of the man with the firm purpose of ihe judge, he made care ful inquiries into the circumstances surrounding the criminals who admitted their guilt, and meted out the penalty with intelligent discrimination, having an eye to the welfare of the community and also of the prisoner. Two young men were arraigned for highway robbery : they were about 18 years old; charged with seizing a man in the night, and robbing him of his watch. Their plea was not guilty. A jury was called and sworn in. They were all very respectable men in appearance ; not one of them unsuitable to hear and decide on the evidence in such a case. The com plainant was the first witness, and he testified, in German- English, that he was going home from a wedding party, where he left his wife and his hat, being somewhat excited with liquor ; he was set upon by these two prisoners at the bar, who robbed him of his watch : he seized them both : held one of them, and the other fled, leaving a portion of his coat in his hand. Calling out for help, he was heard by an officer, who came, meeting the escaped robber flying. Him he cap tured and brought along, and coming up, took the other also into custody. The watch was found near the spot where he caught the runaway. This was one side of the story, con firmed by the officer. The two rogues were examined, and swore that they were peacefully walking the street when this half-drunken man, hatless and coatless, stumbled against them, wanted to fight, did get into a fight, during which his watch was pulled off : they left him and he called the police : an officer appeared and took them into custody. This was the other side of the story. Their lawyer made a speech very like those we read in books, where high-sounding words and platitudes are made to take the place of argument and sense. He sought to impress the jury with the fact that this case involved the rights and liberties of two American citizens whose intelligence and virtues were entitled to respect : that there was no evidence against them but the story of a drunken vagabond who did not know at the time whether he was afoot or on horseback : and if on such testimony they were to be sent to State's Prison, then Magna Charta, Fourth of July and TWO HOURS IN COURT. 97 the Constitution, were all in vain. He did not say these words, but that was the drift, and perhaps mine is the better speech. Mr. Russell followed with a brief, lucid, unimpas- sioned recital of the facts as proved : exhibited the coat and the fragment left by the flying assailant : read the law and decisions explaining the grade of the crime, and left the case. The Judge charged the jury with clearness and brevity : they retired, and soon returned with a verdict of guilty. The Judge sentenced them each to the State Prison for ten years. Mrs. Dr. Sayre was walking in the street a few days ago, when a young man, seeing a pocketbook in her hand, snatched it and ran. He was pursued and caught and now was brought to the bar. He pleaded guilty. His crime is one of the highest except that of murder. What would be his fate ? A gentleman, in whose employment he had been four years, came forward and said that the lad had been perfectly trust worthy all that time and was without a fault. For want of work he had dismissed him and others, and now for months he had been without employment. It further appeared that his old mother had depended on his wages, and when these failed they were utterly destitute. She had urged him to pawn the few things they had, but he refused, and daily traversed the streets seeking work in vain. Desperate and reckless, he saw this purse in a lady's hand, snatched it and ran. Dr. Sayre was present and did not wish to urge extreme measures. Mr. Russell was satisfied that it was a case for judicial mercy. The boy might be saved if not sent to prison, but that would finish his ruin. His mother stood up by her boy and, with flowing tears, tried to plead for mercy. No one in court could refrain from weeping. Literally I do not think there was a dry eye. Judge Cowing set before the boy the enormity of his crime, gave him earnest and wholesome counsel, and consigned him to the Elmira Reformatory. " Thank you, Judge," cried the poor mother, as she turned away brokenhearted, but glad to hear that her son was not to go to State Prison. I said to the Judge : " How unjust we often are in speaking of your decisions! had I read in the daily papers the simple 9% IREN&US LETTERS. mention of the fact that you had let off this young robber with a commitment to the reformatory, I would have thought justice was not done. But I see that it was wise as well as merciful, just to society and kind to the criminal." "It is often very hard," he said, "to determine what is for the best, where discretion is left to us, but we do as well as we can." " I have not a doubt of it," I replied ; " and I am glad I am not on the bench." " I wish you would often come here," he said, as I left the court. This was a very instructive and impressive scene. It was a revelation. Sermons could be made out of it. These young men, already hardened in crime: women thieves : children in the midst of vice. And this all about us : the air we breathe is laden with the crimes of our fellow-beings. Is there no balm in Gilead : is there no remedy here ? A DOUGHNATION PARTY. Perhaps you have not heard of such a party. A surprise party, a wedding party, even a dancing party, you may have attended. And it would not be strange that you are familiar with donation or giving visits. When a lady remarked to me a few days ago that she had attended a doughnut-an party, the name was new to me. But she was kind to my dulness, and explained its hidden meaning. There be many kind of nuts in the world. The butternut is so called because of the oil which abounds in it. It was once called the oilnut. The chestrmt is named from the cyst, chest or case in which the nut is enclosed, the burr so called. The walnut is not a w//-nut, but comes from the Anglo- Saxon, ivalh-knuta, walnut, meaning foreign nut, as it is of Persian descent. Then there is the doughnut, which groweth A DOUGHNATION PARTY. 99 not on a tree like unto the fruits aforesaid ; but a woman taking dough prepared as for the oven, and cutting it into shapes that please her, or more frequently making it into the form of a ball, or a round nut, of such size as seemeth good unto her, droppeth it into boiling fat, lard or oil, and when it is sufficiently cooked, she taketh it forth with a skimmer. Various are the qualities of these doughnuts, according to the amount of shortening and sweetening. They are of Dutch origin, as the walnut is Oriental, and the cruller, and oly- koek, are varieties of the New England doughnut, which holds its own against the world. Mr. Irving has embalmed the Dutch preparation, and the immortality he gives to what he puts into his books shows it is not true that " you can't eat your cake and keep it too." Fifty years ago, more or less, rather more than less, the annual giving-visit was a great affair in the country congre gation. The minister's, salary was always of the smallest, and there was a fond delusion among the people that they helped the matter greatly by afflicting the pastor once a year with a spinning-bee or donation party. The term spinning-bee has so long been out of the speech of people, that you do not know what it means. In good old times, when much linen and woollen were wrought on looms at home, and great fac tories were few and far between, every farmer's wife had her spinning-wheel. And as in the days of the Psalmist a man was famous according to his ability to chop trees, so in my youth a woman sought and found renown by the smoothness of the thread she could spin, and the elegance of the fabric that came from her loom. The wisest of men celebrated such a woman when he said : " She seeketh wool and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands. She layeth her hands to the spindle, and her hands hold the distaff. Shemaketh fine linen." And the Roman matron, Lucretia, at work among her maids was more royally employed than the Queen of Sheba arraying herself in all her glory. Therefore, when the annual giving-visit to the poor pastor was made, the women brought of their store of thread or yarn, or of the cloth they had made, while the men brought 160 IRENES US LETTERS. wood and oats, and such articles as were more in their line of production. As the visit included a supper, it was expected that the women would provide the supplies, and foremost among the provisions for the feast were the inevitable and abounding doughnuts. As everybody had them at home, they were no treat to anybody at the party, and it came to pass that, of the bushels of the article furnished, few were consumed on the occasion. Indeed many brought them as their present to the pastor's wife ! Ah ! well do I remember how long those unsavory lumps of dough and grease lay on the table in the dull days that followed the jolly party. We had doughnuts for breakfast ; doughnuts haunted the dinner ; and doughnuts eked out the supper. It was doughnuts to take to school, and doughnuts when we came home hungry, and doughn-uts when we wanted to eat before going to bed. What became of the woollen and linen goods I knew not, but a lively sense of the prevailing presence and power of dough nuts remained many days after the party, and has not wholly disappeared in the lapse of half a century. We took an account of stock the morning after the visit, and estimating the goods at the givers' valuation, the whole thing might be reckoned as worth a hundred dollars. Half that sum in money could have been used by the minister so as to be of more service than all the produce of the visit, including doughnuts. It was, of course, the prevalence of this last named commodity, over and above the rest, that gave the name, Doughnation Visit. By and by, for short, it was written Ztonation. Hence we view the gradual improve ment in spelling according to Prof. March, LL. D., of La Fay- ette College. Doughnation is now Donation, as walhknuta is walnut. The world moves. The season of the year is at hand when people meditate giving visits to the pastor. These may not be as common as they were fifty years ago, but they are far from being out of fashion. They had in old times, and they have now, this one thing specially to commend them they bring the people together socially and make them personally acquainted. Breaking bread together is a great bond of union, and city A DOUGHNATION PARTY. IOI congregations have done a wholesome thing in providing church parlors where all the people may meet on common ground. It is not the eating and drinking that makes the party useful, though that is something, and not to be omitted. It is the meeting face to face and hand to hand of one family in Christ, members one of another because of Him. Such reunions were more common in the primitive church than they are now, and we may well go back to those days for the model of a working church. There was a Christian socialism then prevalent that fused all the members into one body. We have lost the spirit of those times, and have suffered by the loss. In many congregations there are strangers who are likely to remain strangers, for they never speak nor are spoken to in the intercourse of years. Whose fault it is, it may not be easy to say. But it is a fault that ought to be corrected, and church sociables are in the line of reform. I am not disposed to make light of giving-visits, even if their purpose is to aid the pastor. It is easier for people in many parts of the country to give anything they raise than money. It is hard to raise money. When they have paid the promised salary, it is a pleasing duty to increase the min ister's income by bringing to his house of the fruits of their labor. There is beauty in it. It is a heart offering. And its effect, beyond the value of the gifts, is to show the kindly feelings of the people, and so to cement their union to the pastor and his household. But there is no need of giving a man two or three bushels of doughnuts at once. And this is also to say that the lack of judgment in these promiscuous gifts is fearfully amusing Things utterly useless in the household, and that cannot be sold or exchanged, are often poured in, until there is no room to receive them. In a sweet Swiss village where I was sojourning, a wed ding was coming off. I found it was customary for the near friends of the bride to make out a list of things which were likely to be the most acceptable as gifts, and each friend intending to give anything put his or her name down for some one of these things. Sometimes several persons united 102 1REN&US LETTERS. in the purchase of an article more costly than one alone would give. Thus all were sure that their gifts would fit in, and be useful as well as ornamental, helpful and pleasing. HABITS, ESPECIALLY BAD HABITS. " Habits are soon assumed, but when we strive To strip them off, 'tis being flayed alive." Couiper. Rev. Dr. Adams, who has recently assumed the Presidency of the New York Union Theological Seminary, is in the habit and this is a good habit : all his habits are good so far as I know : he is certainly a model and the young ministers will not fail if they become like him Dr. Adams is in the habit of having one of the Senior class at breakfast with him each morning. Afterwards they retire to the Doctor's study, and from that they go to the church next door; the youthful candidate takes the pulpit and the teacher the pew, and the young man preaches a sermon. Dr. Adams hears and notes the points important to be criticised, matter and manner, voice, tones, gestures, attitudes and faces ; sins of omission and commission ; and then and there, alone and freely, points them out, requires him to try again, to correct the fault on the spot, to get out of the bad habit he is getting into, and if one lesson fails, he must come again and never give over, until the practice is broken up utterly, and a better one formed in its place. This is a capital plan, requiring great labor and self-denial on the part of the accomplished President ; and a service which not many teachers would render, day after day, to a single pupil. For one such lesson a student ought to be grateful to the end of his days. How few have sense enough to know the value of such individual instruction ! Because lessons in the family, the school, the college and the seminary are for the most part given to the children and HABITS, ESPECIALLY BAD HABITS. 103 youth in a group or class, the individual peculiarities of each one are apt to escape that attention which is necessary to their correction if they are evil. And this is true not of young ministers only, or young men only, or young women only, but of all the children and youth growing up, and of millions who have grown up with habits now utterly beyond all hope of improvement. It is a question worth a moment's thought, " Is any bad habit corrected after a person is twenty years old ?" If we answer the question in the negative, and I am strongly inclined to take that side the duty of parents and teachers is invested at once with tremendous responsibility, and this is the object of the letter you are reading. It may also be a warning and so an aid to the young, who need all the help they can have to become better and wiser. You meet a man after a separation of a score of years. The same habits mark him now that were his before. The child is so truly the father of the man, that the man of sixty has the ways that made him notable when a boy. He carries his head just as he did, is stooping or straight, quick or slow, talks through his nose or not, pronounces words wrong just as he did when a young man, and repeats himself all the days of his life. I know some of the most polished gentlemen, of the high est culture, who invariably say Africar for Africa, Asiar for Asia, Jamaicar for Jamaica, and in fact they distinctly add the letter r to words ending in a, especially to proper names. They are unconscious of it, would not know it if it were pointed out to them as their habit, and would probably be hurt if it were mentioned to them. And this suggests the two reasons why bad habits are rarely if ever changed by men or women of ripe years, i. After the habit has become confirmed the person loses all consciousness of it, just as the perfection of health is to be unconscious of having a stomach. 2. One's self-esteem is wounded by criticism, and a habit is cherished all the more fondly because assailed. It has been said it is very nearly true that no mortal is willing to be criticized, found fault 104 I RE N^. US LETTERS. with, and this makes criticism an ungracious and ungrateful task. I have ventured in the course of my life, to make the attempt to do unto others as I would have others do unto me, and to point out, in a kind and inoffensive way, the glaring fault of a friend : perhaps a public speaker, or a writer. In no one instance did any good come of it. A preacher has a habit of wrinkling his forehead while he speaks, or of pitching his voice immoderately high, or of mouthing his words, or shrugging his shoulders, of speaking too low or too loud, too fast or too slow; whatever it is, after he has fairly settled to his work in the ministry he goes on, more and more so, the bad habit growing as his strength increases, moderating somewhat as old age weakens him, and he dies, the same habit clinging to him till the end. He was hurt whenever any one alluded to his habit : he said he could not help it, or he did not believe it, or it was his way, and if the people did not like it they could let it alone, and so repulsing friendly criticism, and hugging his fault, as a parent loves the deformed child the most, he sticks to his own, and goes from worse to worst. Peculiarities are not necessarily faults. Something dis tinctive belongs to every earnest man. But faults of man ner are no more to be cherished for the sake of distinction than lameness is to be preferred to sound limbs. The children that play at the fireside and sit at the table with you, are even now growing into habits that will never be broken up. You may treat it lightly and let them become fixed in their ways of doing or not doing things, of leaving the door open when they ought to shut it, of dropping their work or playthings when they ought to put them away into their proper places, of using improper words, of being selfish and proud and vain; peevish, fretful, censorious ; neglecting duties that should be done at once; of disobeying when spoken to once ; of speaking when they ought to be silent ; little habits so little that their mention seems idle ; but let these habits, any or all of them, be unconnected when children are under age, and they will never be changed. Put a grown up man into a mortar and bray him with a pestle, yet will THE EVIL EYE. 105 not his bad habits depart from him. The way the child walks in he walks when he is old. And all this has not so much to do with those habits which may or may not be vices, according to the extent in which they are indulged, for it is not always that an eccentricity is a vice but it refers to those little foxes that spoil the vines ; faults too small to be named, that make up character and a large part of the life that now is. Bear with them in your friend ; they are spots on the sun ; remembering that he sees greater faults in you, perhaps ! And as Cowper furnished me a motto to begin with, let us find a fitting couplet for the close in Dryden : " All habits gather by unseen degrees, As brooks make rivers, rivers run to seas." THE EVIL EYE. A beautiful, life-like portrait of an old friend has awakened the memory of a fact that may point a moral. I refer to the smooth well-rounded face of the late Milton Badger, D.D., that adorns the last number of the Congregattotial Quarterly. When I came to this city, in the year 1840, Dr. Badger and Dr. Charles Hall were secretaries of the American Home Missionary Society. Their office was very near to mine, and I was soon pleasantly acquainted with them. We were in the daily habit of taking dinner together at a restaurant on the corner of Beekman and Nassau street, in the building which is now the Park Hotel. In the summer of that year, conversing with a friend and speaking of pleasant persons with whom I had become associated since coming to the city, I mentioned Dr. Badger as one of them. My friend remarked: " What a pity it is that he is afflicted with such turns!" " I was not aware that he was suffering in any way. To what do you allude?" 106 1REN&US LETTERS. "Perhaps I ought not to have spoken of it," my friend replied ; " but lest you should imagine it to be something worse than it really is, I may as well tell you ; he has occa sional turns of derangement, and is obliged to leave his work and retire for a time to an asylum. They do not last long, but they have been coming on more and more frequently for some years." " This is very sad : I would not have suspected it from any thing I have seen ; but now that you speak of it, I perceive a sadness, a reticence, and almost a melancholy in his expres sion, that may well haunt a mind that is disordered." " Yes ; it takes the form of melancholy without cause, and is temporarily relieved by medical treatment, only to return more painfully than before." From this time onward I began to pay more particular attention to the looks, the acting, manner and words of my poor unfortunate friend Badger. I observed that he and his colleague always came to dinner together, which indicated the importance of his being kept closely watched. He sometimes failed to notice a remark made by another of the company at the table, which led me to think his mind was wandering. He would now and then cast a glance so full of pity and sor row, I was sure that he was himself suffering. His knife and fork began to appear dangerous weapons in his hands, and if he rested a moment in the midst of dinner, he seemed to me meditating an attack upon some other meat than that on his plate. The signs of latent madness cropped out continually, and the danger of being with him appeared to increase, so that I determined to have a consultation with Dr. Hall, in reference to some decided course to be pursued with him. Seeking an opportunity I said to him, when we were by ourselves: " It is very sad this trouble of Dr. Badger's; don't you think something ought to be done about it?" " I do not understand you," said Dr. Hall. " I beg pardon if I have touched upon anything that is secret, but I supposed it was generally known, and it was in the purest sympathy that I referred to it." THE EVIL EYE, 107 Dr. Hall replied, " I do not know what you are speaking of, and you will have to explain yourself." I was still under the impression that he was tryingto divert me from my suspicions, and I said frankly, " I am told that he is subject to fits of derangement, and is often confined for treatment, and then returns to his duties." Dr. Hall exploded with laughter, to my astonishment and relief: and, calling to Dr. Badger, whose room adjoined his own, he said, " Come in here, and tell us what you have been doing." He then repeated to his associate the story I had told him, and they made themselves as merry over it as was becoming two divines. When the explanation was sought, it was found that my informant had confounded Dr. Badger with another person, of whom all the facts were correctly stated, but they were applied to the wrong man ! For a long time afterward the incident was the occasion of pleasantry between us, and besides the amusement it afforded, is the lesson it teaches to be very cautious of awakening unjust suspicions in regard to others. If I had been called on to testify in a court of justice, as to the sanity of Dr. Badger, before I went to his colleague with my suspicions, I should have been compelled to speak of the "look out of his eye," the "incoherent observation," the "absent-mindedness," the "sudden movement," the appa rent "melancholy" which had marked the deportment of one of the most even, placid, well-balanced, judicious and undisturbed men in the world. But the evil eye of suspicion, with which I had regarded him, had discovered signs of incipient insanity, and had perverted the suavity of a Chris tian gentleman into the lurking seeds of mental disease. To injure the usefulness of a good man, to poison the hap piness of a noble woman, it is necessary only to give wings to words of suspicion in regard to character, and the evil deed is done. A faithful pastor has won his way to a well- earned reputation, and a report gets abroad that " he drinks :" that is, " he is intemperate :" for with many people " to drink Io8 IRENsEUS LETTERS. at all is to be intemperate," and the story is confirmed by every instance of special success in the pulpit, and by every failure that he makes. It is quite as well to kill a dog at once as to give it out that he is mad, for then he is sure to be hunted to the death. And when once the suspicion is awakened that a man or a woman is not altogether right, every act, however innocent, is construed into evidence of wrong. Words that are as gentle and good as if they fell from the lips of angels, are perverted by prejudice into wit nesses of evil, and out of their own mouths the innocent are condemned. To speak ill of a neighbor is in almost every case an injury to society, and to speak evil unjustly is to bear false witness, which is one of the most grievous sins. I have heard you say that it is a namby-pamby milk-and- water sort of virtue that requires us to speak only what is good of people, and that faults are as fair a subject of remark as the merits of others. But I do not agree with you in that. The law of love is the best rule of life, and to speak ill of others is to be allowed only when love requires it. Censure is as just at some times as praise at others. Only let it be in love. But if the truth is not to be spoken always, if silence is better than speech when speaking the truth would do evil and no good, how wicked and how dangerous it is to utter a word of untruth, even a breath of suspicion, a trifling hint or insinuation that may soil the fair face of a spotless name, and dim the lustre of a virtuous character. The tongue is a little member, but it is a mighty power. And words once spoken can never, never, never be unsaid. MODEL MINISTER, PROFESSOR, AND MAN. 109 THE MODEL MINISTER, PASTOR, PROFESSOR, AND MAN. REMARKS AT THE INAUGURATION OF THE TABLET IN PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CHAPEL, TO THE MEMORY OF REV. SAMUEL MILLER, D.D. As I speak of Dr. Samuel Miller, he rises on my memory as when I saw him for the first time. It was in the autumn of 1832: in the 63d year of his life, in the morning of that old age which put on immortality at 81. Coming to the Seminary with a letter of introduction to him, I called and was received in his library, in the midst of which he was standing, clad in a white flannel study gown, and with a black silk cap on his head. The walls, from floor to ceiling, lined with books ; the gently burning wood-fire ; the imple ments of learned toil ; a form of manly grace and beauty ; his paternal smile and pressure of my hand ; all these come back to me fresh and warm, though nearly half a century lies between that scene and this, as we meet to cut his name in marble and pay this honor to his memory. Having given me a kindly welcome and learned my intended course of study, he said : " You will often want books that others have drawn from the library ; you see mine; while you are in the Seminary, consider them yours; take as many as you wish ; come whenever you please and help yourself." He followed this remarkable offer by taking down some works, the names of which I remember distinctly, and I carried them off " rejoicing as one who findeth great spoil." Whoever speaks of Dr. Miller without personal knowledge of him, portrays a man of great dignity, formality, with that reserve which weak men sometimes suppose to be essential to the manners of a gentleman. He was free from those weaknesses. Without affectation, he was simply a refined Christian, with the nicest sense of the proprieties ; the most no IREN^US LETTERS. delicate consideration for others, deep personal humility, and unbounded benevolence. When these virtues are com bined with large learning, extensive intercourse with culti vated men, and a fine person, you have as nearly a perfect model as God often makes. The first time that I read an essay before the class Dr. Miller was in the chair. The juvenile performance was sub mitted to the tender mercies of the students, each of whom was at liberty to make his comments. These were free, and some of them very caustic. My epidermis was then much more tender than it is now. Some kindly criticisms fell from the lips of my distinguished friend, the Rev. Dr. D. X. Junkin. The Church and the world have heard of other men who took me in hand that morning. When they had flayed me alive, cut me up entirely, it remained for Dr. Miller to hold an inquest on the remains. With exceeding gentle ness he said, " Will you be so kind as to remain after the class retires ?" I remained, in sure and certain fear that the excoriation was to be so severe that his tenderness would not suffer him to perform the operation in public. We were alone, and he broke the silence by saying, in his blandest tones, " Will you do me the favor to come and take tea with me to-morrow ; I wish you to become acquainted with my family." I recovered and went. While in the lecture room, I am reminded of one of the happiest illustrations of Dr. Miller's manners, his genial humor, and regard for the feelings of those whom he would correct. We took our seats in the old oratory often in chairs of our own, provided with a leaf on which we could write our notes. One of the class had so 'placed his chair that he sat with his back to Dr. Miller; the impropriety of the position deserved rebuke, but he did not wish to mortify the young man ; and as he was about to commence his lecture Dr. Miller said : " Mr. , I prefer in this lecture to reason a priori, rather than a posteriori" Amid the roars of the class, he wheeled right about face. Dr. Miller's standard of clerical manners was admirably MODEL MINISTER, PROFESSOR, AND MAN. in expressed in one of those memorable Sabbath afternoon conferences, when that subject was up for discussion. He said to us: "I would have the minister, in his manner of life, his dress, his equipage, so conform to the reasonable expectations of society, as to avoid remark either on the ground of parsimony or of extravagance. Thus, if he rides, I would not wish the people to be able to say, ' What a fine horse the parson has ! ' Nor on the other hand, 'What a rat of a thing our minister rides ! ' " Born in the State of Delaware, his father a rural pastor, he had the best home that children have who are to be trained for usefulness and heaven. His collegiate course was completed with honor in Philadelphia. His pastoral life was begun and ended in the city of New York. In the early years of his ministry, with men of might and renown around him, the youthful soldier of the cross bore himself so bravely as to command respectful admiration and honor. Before the time when Doctorates were then wont to fall on the reverend head, he met his fate. It does not take so much to make a doctor in our day as it did in his, the boys become Doctors of Divinity now almost as soon as they leave off their aprons, but he was decorated when so young, that we may easily appreciate an incident which occurred on a journey he made in New England just after he experienced a change from simple Mr. to a more excellent degree. His travelling friend introduced him to a plain-spoken divine as " Dr. Miller of New York," and the man taking him at once to be a physician, asked him about the yellow fever; when his friend informed him that this was a Doctor of Divinity ; upon which he lifted up his hands and exclaimed, with emphasis peculiar to the expression, You DON'T ! His pulpit talents, both as a writer and speaker, were of a high order ; graceful, able and eloquent, bringing only beaten oil into the sanctuary, preaching without notes, with earnest ness, fluency and force, he was heard with profit, and his ministry was eminently useful and successful. His life of 20 years in New York must have been won derfully distinguished, far beyond that of men of his years, 112 IREN^US LETTERS. He was 24 years old when he was ordained pastor of the First Presbyterian church; he was 44 when translated to the Seminary in Princeton, yet, in this first score of his min isterial years, he became the acknowledged champion of Presbyterian Church order ; a voluminous author, some of whose books were republished in England, extorting from one of its reviews the reluctant admission that " Mr. Miller has deserved well of both worlds." He was one of the fathers of Theological Seminary education in the United States. He was one of the consulting and devising minds that gave form to the Andover Seminary. He and Dr. Ashbel Green " may be considered the founders of Princeton Theological Seminary." And in the midst of labors, multifarious and multitudinous, he was called to the Presidency of Dickinson College, Pa., the Presidency of the University of North Car olina, and to the Presidency of Hamilton College, N. Y. He came to the Seminary, the child of his affections, in the second year of its life, and in the early prime of his own. With what devotion, diligence, and ability ; with what learn ing, wisdom, and success, he served the Church and its great Head! His broad, ripe, liberal culture forbade him to be a High Churchman, for he held that to be the tap root of Popery; but he was an intelligent Presbyterian divine, a beautiful type of the best school of ecclesiastical science, a full-orbed example of the thoroughly furnished minister of the Word. Hundreds who sat at his feet have gone out into the rich harvest fields to do work for the Master. Some of them are among the great men of the ages ; others, unknown to fame, have lived and died ; no white shaft rises from the green sod that covers their precious dust ; no tablet tells the genera tions that such men ever lived, but He whose hand upholds the spheres has set them with the stars. Thus, Dr. Miller trained men to be true and faithful, to be proud of their lineage, loyal to their Church, and gallant soldiers of the cross. The prophets, where are they ? We write their names on tablets, their memories are holy in our hearts ; their instruc- THE BABES IN THE WOODS. 113 tions we follow with reverence ; grant God that when we too have finished our course with joy, we may sit down with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob, with Samuel Miller and the Alexanders and Breckinridge and Hodge, the last ascended, and join with them in the humble cry, " Not unto us, not unto us." THE BABES IN THE WOODS. Whene'er I take my walks abroad, how many babes I see, because I leave the dusty road, and seek a shady lea. That lea in New York is the Central Park ; the only meadow which dwellers in the city made with hands can enjoy. It is a great luxury to have it. Even we who cannot afford the luxury of equipage, may take a cane for company, and stroll miles and miles in the smooth walks, by the side of charm ing lakes enlivened with white and also black swans ; under the shadows of great trees ; now and then resting our weary feet by sitting on the rude benches. It is a habit of mine, when it is possible, to fly from the shop to the Park for a nip of fresh air and a bit of exercise. In the hot weather of the present October this retreat has been specially agreeable. Indeed we have not known such an October since the Dutch made this city New Amsterdam. The Park is the useful refuge for nurses and babies. Thou sands of mothers are only too glad to have their children taken from home into the open air or anywhere, and the nurses are quite as well pleased to go as mothers are to have them. But of these thousands of mothers, few, if any of them, know what becomes of their children when once out of sight. Yesterday I turned into the Park at the head of Sixth avenue. There are some charming little retreats not far from the gateway. Shady and cool, by the waterside, they invite the children to play, and the nurses to meet their friends. Another favorite resort is over on the East side U4 tKENMUS LETTERS. near the wild beasts. Here the little people gather numer ously, and are easily amused. The great thing is to get where the children can take care of themselves, so that the young-lady-nurse may not be disturbed with duties while she enjoys the pleasure of an interview with her " cousin," who has happened to be in the Park at the same hour. A little way into the Park, and I encountered an Irish nurse administering discipline to a babe a couple of years old. The child was crying, the nurse was scolding and shak ing her. I stopped in front of the group : "There, now," said the nurse to the child, "the man is going to carry you off ; you naughty girl, you." "No," said I, "that's no such thing; you ought to be carried off yourself and kept off, for frightening the child; you are sent out here to amuse the child, and you are scaring the life out of it with your lies. I wish I had the right to punish you on the spot." By the time I had made this long speech the babe was quieted, and the nurse, finding her tongue, began her retort, which, I have no doubt, was sharp enough, but I did not wait to hear it. At the other end of the lake Bridget and her " cousin" were so closely engaged in conversation that she did not observe the babe wandering off on the green grass ; it was pleasant for the child and quite safe, unless the little crea ture should fall into the water. She would not have drowned, for it was an easy matter to pick a baby out of the quiet lake. Not one has ever yet been drowned under such cir cumstances. As the children joined each other on the grass, hugged and played and tumbled about in their childish glee, it was easy to see how rapidly infectious diseases are spread. Mrs. Jones' child is out of sorts, peevish and languid. Bridget must take it to the Park. The mother does not know that a few days before it was playing on the grass with a number of children, one of whom was in just the condition of her pet to-day ; it was ready to break out with the scarlet fever, or diphtheria, or some other complaint. Half a dozen children from as many different parts of the city are thus THE BABES IN THE WOODS. 115 exposed. To-day Mrs. Jones sends her child into the Park ; it is in the state to give the same disease to all the babes she plays with ; to-morrow she is down sick, everybody wonder ing where she could have caught that dreadful complaint. Wandering along my winding way, and passing a bench of Bridgets, beaux and babies, one of the latter fell head first from its cradle and struck upon the solid concrete walk. It made no scream, and I hoped it was not hurt. But when I had passed a few steps on, the cry came, piercing my ear and heart. The stunned child had " come to," and was now shrieking in pain and fright. Doubtless it was soon hushed, and Bridget pursued her interrupted tete-a-tete with her "cousin." The fond mother at home will never know of the accident that happened to her darling child while the unfaithful nurse was flirting with a man ; but in the course of a year or two the child will become more and more restless, fitful, uncontroll able ; then it will be lethargic ; convulsions will seize and distort it; parents will weep and pray, and plead with doc tors to do something for it ; they will shake their heads and fear there is water on the brain, and if so, there is great reason to fear ; " did the child ever fall on its head ?" no, never ; and then comes one more convulsive struggle ; its little hands are clutched ; its limbs are drawn into fierce con tortions ; and the doctor says it does not suffer pain ; it is quite unconscious ; these awful throes are involuntary ; then it opens its eyes in the light of a mother's love, and its soul goes out to Him who gave it. That is the result of just such an accident as happened when I passed the unwatched cradle in the Park. Hundreds of such cradles and nurses are in the Park to-day. Fond mothers think they are doing everything for their babes when they hire one woman for each child, to give her whole time" to it. But they are trying to get for their children what money cannot procure. You live in the country, and imagine that the hints in this letter are intended for the mothers of New York, whose babies and nurses enjoy the Central Park. But I am writing to them and to you. The progress of social refinement, the Il6 IREN&US LETTERS. increase of wealth and culture, the division of labor, the demands of society, women's work in the Church, take up so much time that mothers turn off the care of their babes upon hired nurses. Mrs. Smith sends for me to come and talk with her about founding an asylum for deserted and orphan children. Her own son, twelve years old, was stretched on the rug, with dirty shoes, munching an apple, and acting more like a pig in the straw than the oldest son of a lady. She told him to get up, but he wouldn't, and he didn't. We talked as well as we could, and I thought her own children needed care quite as much as the Arabs of the street or the desert. And so it is everywhere. Home is the source of salvation for society. We want good homes. Mothers are the makers of the manners of their sons and daughters. But the mother who commits her tender babes to the unwatched care of a half-civilized pagan or papal nurse, and then imagines that she has done her duty, is a mother false to her nature, to herself, to her children, false to God and to society. If she has heart enough to ache, she will yet regret her neglect of maternal duties, when it is too late to retrieve the lamentable loss. MANNERS IN CHURCH. Thirty people, young men and maidens, " taken up" and brought before a magistrate, for misbehavior in church, pro duced no small stir in a quiet Long Island village, the other day. If they had all been fined, or even imprisoned for a while, that they might give themselves to reflection and pen itence, it would have served them right, and perhaps would have been a wholesome discipline. They had been laughing, talking, and disporting them selves in a most unseemly manner, and it was well to bring such base fellows, of both sexes, to the only bar of which they are afraid. Indeed, it is strange that, in a civilized and MANNERS IN CHURCH. 117 Christian country, there can be, in any community, a set of youth so destitute of decency as to go into a place of prayer to make fun ! Yet this is only an excess of ill- breeding or bad manners, and there is not a little of it in the most refined cities and church circles, different in degree, and in kind also, but liable to criticism and censure nevertheless. It is not the proper thing to come to church after the ser vice has been opened. Where circumstances have made it impracticable to be early, the late comer may be justified on the ground that it is better to come late than not at all. But it is a fact that some people have a habit of coming late, and it is very plain, to those whom they disturb, that they might have been in time had they taken pains to be so. Invited to dinner, they would regard it very rude to keep the other guests waiting, or to make a disturbance, by com ing five or ten minutes after the dinner is served. But it is almost an unheard-of event, probably it was never known, that a Christian congregation had the privilege of beginning its public devotions without being immediately afflicted by the arrival of those who come tearing up the aisle while others are trying to pray or praise. To speak of such offences against, good manners as whis pering in divine service, laughing or sleeping, ought to be quite unnecessary, for it is hard to believe that such vices prevail to any extent in Christian churches. Yet we do see it sometimes, and always with a feeling that those who indulge in it have no proper sense of the fact expressed in those words : " Holiness becometh thine house, O Lord of Hosts." On a beautiful Sabbath forenoon, I was in the middle seat of one of the largest Fifth avenue churches in this city. Before me, in another pew, sat a well-dressed man, who was also an Orthodox divine, whose garments were so thoroughly imbued with the odor of tobacco, that the fragrance filled the circumambient air as if the man were a hogshead of the weed. Probably to some near him the aroma was delicious, and they blessed him for bringing the scent with him, that they might enjoy it and the gospel together. But unto us Il8 IREN&US LETTERS. whose olfactories have never been refined to the delicacy essential to appreciate the sweet savor of such a Sabbath sacrifice, the stench was abominable. Was it according to the law of Christ for this good man to come into the house to be an offence unto the ladies and all the weak brethren in his vicinity ? In this connection, I am sorely tempted to say that there are other odors equally disagreeable to some which the brethren do not bring to church ; but it is not safe to say a word against perfumes, lest those who come laden with them should be more offended than are we who endure them. It is indeed written in the Psalms, " All thy gar ments smell ot myrrh;" but however much some may fancy myrrh, it is not possible to build an argument upon one poet ical passage like that, to prove the propriety of poisoning the atmosphere of the sanctuary with musk, patchouli and mille fleurs. The right and wrong of this turn upon the rule of doing as we would have others do to us. Intensely unpleasant to many people is the smell of tobacco. Many perfumes, deli cious to some, are quite as disagreeable to others. The church is a place where we ought to be allowed to meet without being compelled to inhale odors which are purely artificial, and have no necessary relations to the comfort and convenience of any. On this principle of doing as we would be done by, and remembering that it is our duty to deny ourselves for the sake of others, we ought to forego the privilege of public worship when we are liable to carry in our garments or our breath the germ of disease. It is often a dreadful truth that scarlet fever and other infectious and contagious diseases are spread by the presence in church of those who come from houses where these pestilential sicknesses are, or have been recently. Kind, good women will go to a friend's home and minister with angelic faithfulness by a sick bed, and from that house go to the sanctuary with the diseases all over and through their raiment. Persons suffering with severe colds and coughs make themselves an affliction to MANNERS IN CHURCH. 119 Others, preventing all in their vicinity from deriving profit or enjoyment from the services, when it is their Christian duty to stay at home. They need the medical doctor. Let us be very gentle in our treatment of mothers who come to church with babes in their arms, for well do we know they would not bring them could they leave them. Yet even they will leave the house, when their infants insist on being heard, to the disturbance of public worship. While we were singing the doxology, I counted sixteen Presbyterians putting on their overcoats. It would have been better had I been worshipping instead of counting, but it was almost involuntary, and did not take me more than ten seconds ; while those stout worshippers wrestled with their garments, and, wriggling into them, finally stood erect in time to come out with the words, " By all in heaven." Had they reverently paused till the benediction had been given, they might have arrayed themselves comfortably and reached home in reasonable time. Coming down the broad aisle, the fragrant divine asked me, " How did you like the sermon ?" I told him in the fewest words. A lady friend said, " How did you like the sermon ?" I replied in words more, because a lady was to be answered. Approaching the door, a gentleman greeted me cordially, and said, " What did you think of that ser mon ?" I told him as I had told the others, for it was an excellent discourse. In the vestibule one of the elders took me by the hand and, with true seriousness, asked, " Didn't you like the sermon ; we have just such every Sunday." No one of these Christian worshippers appeared to have any other thought of the morning service but the sermon, and how other people "liked it." Let us not undervalue the sermon. But also let us not make it the test of one's profit and comfort in the worship of God. And I must say I would rather not be required to pass an opinion upon the preach ing, while yet at the gate of heaven. How it was in days of old, we need not now discuss. It was never right to make preaching the primary business of church service. Prayer and praise are the more important 120 1REN&US LETTERS. parts. And the feeling of every hearer should be that of reverence, as in the presence of the Infinite and the Holy One. If a sense of the divine excellency fall upon us in God's house, it will make us suitably afraid. The place will be sacred. And it will be good for us to be there. LONG-WINDED SPEAKERS. His Royal Highness the Duke of Blank was presiding at a public meeting, when and where the Rev. Rowland Hill was to be one of the speakers. One who preceded him had the bad taste, bad manners and great folly to talk an hour and more, to the weariness of the audience, the disgust of the chairman, and the injury of the cause for the promotion of which the meeting had been called. The Duke whispered to Mr. Hill, who sat near him, " Really, Mr. Hill, I do not think I can sit to hear such another speech as this : I wish you would give one of your good-natured hints about it." When the man on his legs had at last exhausted himself, as well as his hearers, and had subsided, Mr. Hill arose and said : " May it please your Royal Highness, ladies and gentlemen, I am not going to make a long speech, or a moving speech. The first is a rudeness, and the second is not required to-day : after the very moving one you have just heard, so moving that several of the company have been moved by it out of the room ; nay, I even fear such another would so move his Royal Highness himself that he would be unable to continue in the chair, and would, to the great regret of the meeting, be obliged to move off." This put an end to the long speeches of that day, but it did not put an end to the evil. For it is an evil that has held its own in spite of all remedies, and is quite as afflictive and fatal now as ever. Even this eccentric yet very sensible man, as he became old, would spin out his discourses to an unreasonable length, LONG -WINDED SPEAKERS. 121 to the injury of their effect, and consequently to the detri ment of Christ's cause. He continued to preach long after he was fourscore, and, though feeble when he began, he v/armed up with his work, preached the people into a good frame, and then preached them out of it again. He would say, after finding that he had been preaching more than an hour, " Well, I am sure I had not an idea of it : it was too long for me and too long for the people : but when I am once set a-going I cannot stop. I must be shorter." In one of his letters, Mr. Hill speaks of the sufferings of those who are obliged to endure long speeches, " without any remedy or redress, upon the high fidgets, above half the time gaping and watching the clock." " In most of the public meetings, I have been tired down before they are half over, and have been obliged to sheer off with the remains of my patience, and leave the finishing to others. " In the way in which too many of these public meetings are conducted, I have my fears that many a good cause is injured by the means adopted for their support. Though some may be gratified by what may be said to the point, yet, oh, the? dulness, the circumlocutionness, the conceit, the tautology of others. In short, few know how to be pithy, short and sweet. And as I find it very difficult to be pithy and sweet, my refuge at all times is to be short." My sympathies are with Mr. Hill and the other man who said, " If I never did a great thing in my life, I am sure I never did a long thing." While the Scotch minister was of a very different disposition who was asked if he was not very much exhausted after preaching three hours ; he said, " O no ; but it would have done you good to see how worried the people were." Dr. Emmons, a celebrated New England divine, was wont to say to young ministers : " Be short in all religious exer cises. Better leave the people longing than loathing. No conversions after the first half hour." The last remark is terrible, and perhaps not literally true, but there is a thought in it to be pondered by preachers and all public speakers. To carry conviction home to the heart, 122 IRENJEUS LETTERS. to persuade men to will and do that to which they are now averse, this is the work which the speaker sets before him, and he makes a grand blunder if he imagines that he is becoming more and more effective as they become weary and wish that he would be done. Of this sort of preachers was he who, when he had split his subject into so many heads as to split the heads of his hearers, and harried them under each division beyond all reason, at last exclaimed, " And what shall I say more !" " Say, amen," said a child who was one of the few awake. When we censure these men of lungs, who love to be on their legs when their hearers wish them to sit down", we are uniformly met with the reply that, " in old times," it was com mon to preach one, two and even three hours : and the fault is in the people, and not in the speaker, if these long services are not acceptable now. But a sensible man will take things as they are, and make them better if he can. Things are not now as they once were. And if the age has become impatient of long speeches and heavy essays, and learned books, let us give the age what it will hear and read, and do it all the good we can. The man who overdoes the matter in public address, usu ally is betrayed into the mistake by forgetfulness of the flight of time, or by a secret self-conceit of his own that he is enter taining and instructing the audience. Some men actually mistake for applause the good-natured efforts of the people to remind them that they have had enough. It is impossible to lay down a rule on the subject, by which the length of a speech or sermon is to be measured. We ought to have some plan by which, at public meetings, a speaker may be brought to his bearings when he has been up to his allotted time. And in these days of electrical tele graphs, what hinders the construction of an apparatus, easily adjusted to every platform, by which a dull speaker may be shaken up a little, and the long-winded one reminded that his time is out, and then if he will not sit down, he shall be knocked over gently. Such a contrivance would greatly enliven public meetings, and tend to increase their useful- HENRY AND HILDEQRAND. 123 ness. Should any inventive genius put this hint into prac tical operation, no claim of priority will ever disturb his patent ; I throw it out for the use of the public. Be short. You may not be able to make a great speech. But you can be short. Some of the most effective speeches ever made were short. Generals on the eve of battle are brief. He who spake as never man spake, said few words at a time. The time is short. Life is short. HENRY AND HILDEBRAND. This tenth day of January is a memorable anniversary. The Jesuits celebrate it. It revives the memory of the proudest day in the history of the Church of Rome, and the date of the beginning of its fall. Eight hundred years ago, Henry IV., Emperor of Ger many, barefooted and bareheaded, with a rope around his neck, stood at the gate of Canossa Castle, begging for par don, while Gregory VII., the haughty Hildebrand, revelled in luxury with the Countess Matilda within. By some writers she is spoken of as his paramour. There are Prot estant historians who believe the relations of the Pope and the Countess were pure. They were certainly not discreet. This Pope was a great reformer, and the dissoluteness of his clergy was the chief object at which he directed his blows. He forbade them to marry also, thus vindicating the now admitted supremacy of Popery in the art of doing one thing and pretending to do another. The priests were dis solute in their morals, and the Pope prohibited the mar riage of those who would lead lives of purity in holy wed lock according to the law of God. The Jesuits throughout the world observe this day as the anniversary the Sooth of the degradation of the Emperor of Germany at the feet of the Pope of Rome. The story is the most romantic in the annals of Popery, and the day is 124 IREN&US LETTERS. a pivot in the history of that great anti-Christian power. That was the day when the power of the Pope of Rome was at its zenith. All earthly kings and kingdoms were then at his disposal. From that day began his fall, which has been steadily going lower and lower, until to-day, Jan. 10, 1877, there is not one crowned head in Europe who cares a six pence for the Pope of Rome. And the successor of that mighty Hildebrand, who claimed to be and was at that time the disposer of all lands on earth, is not now the proprietor in fee of a foot of ground beneath the sun. Like Lucifer he has fallen, never to rise again. The sceptre has passed out of his hand, and instead of having kings standing as beggars at his gate, there is none so poor to do him reverence. And he begs pence from the chamber maids of New York and the peasants of Ireland under the pretence of being a prisoner in the Vatican, dependent on the charity of his poor parishioners. History furnishes no such example of a retributive provi dence. Henry IV. of Germany claimed the divine right of kings, as one ordained of God, and mocked the notion of the age that the Pope was supreme in States as well as in the Church. The Pope and he fell out, and the Pope beat him. For in that dark age, when a bishop might be unable to read or write, and there was far more superstition than religion in the Church, the people thought the Pope had two swords, the spiritual and the secular, and with the former he could cut off a bishop's head, and with the other a king's head, whenever he wanted exercise. Henry excommunicated Hildebrand, and Hildebrand ex communicated Henry. The Pope absolved Henry's subjects from their allegiance, claiming this right as vested in the head of the Church. This proclamation fell like a pall of death on the fortunes of the King. His subjects turned away from him. His allies deserted him. The Suabian and Saxon princes assembled in solemn conclave, and deter mined to elect a new king who would obey the Pope. , Henry quailed and finally succumbed. The man went out of him. HENRY AND HILDEBRAND. 12$ He consented to humble himself before the Pope and ask forgiveness. In the coldest winter then known in the mem ory of man, he set out before Christmas day, and, through incredible sufferings, he crossed the Alps in storms of snow and the freezing cold, with his wife and child. The Pope had taken up his residence in the Castle of Canossa, with the Countess Matilda, and there awaited the coming of the humbled monarch. Before the excommunicated sovereign went a melancholy procession of excommunicated bishops and nobles who shared his fortunes, and were now with him seeking absolution. They, too, were barefoot, for they were all beggars together. The haughty Pope put each one of them into a solitary cell, and finally sent them back with his ghostly pardon. But he reserved his chief terrors for the prostrate monarch. Admitted within the first gate, the king was made to stand in the second enclosure, barefoot and fasting, for three whole days and nights, in the bitter cold of winter, while the Pope and the woman revelled in their luxury within. At last the Pope yielded to the impor tunities of the woman and admitted the degraded king into his presence, and finally patched up a peace with him. This was the bold assertion of the supremacy of the Church of Rome above the governments of the world. It is the doctrine of the Church to-day. It is taught in the writ ings of the authorized teachers of that Church in the city of New York to-day. What was the effect of the scene we have now described ? Henry returned to Germany, rallied his people, who came back to their senses and allegiance, marched upon the Pope and put him into prison. An old enemy of his delivered him, and he was set up only to be cast down again ; and loaded with contempt and scorn, torn with disappointment and chagrin, he perished a miserable exile from power. From that day, Jan. 10, 1077 the battle has been going on until the Pope found his Waterloo at Sedan. Down to that downfall of the last French Empire, he had managed to keep up the illusion of temporal sovereignty ; playing at the game of kings and pretending that he was one of the rulers 126 1RENJEUS LETTERS. among the powers that be. But one after another of the kingdoms that were once governed by the permission of the Pope have outgrown the superstition of his right, and when the dogma of Infallibility was proclaimed, and the last friend of the Pope followed it up by a declaration of war against the successor of Henry IV., Hildebrand's old foe, THEN began the final struggle between the claims of the Pope on one hand and the rights of men on the other. It was Roman ism represented by the Pope and Napoleon, and it was the Protestant principle incarnate in the stern old German King. How firm the tread of the monarch as he came to do the will of God ! How the legions of superstition, with the blessing of the Pope on their eagles, went down like grass before the scythe, as the mighty Northmen moved on and avenged the loth of January, 1077? The spirit and the doctrine and the purpose of the Church of Rome are to-day identical with those of eight hundred years ago. This is the boast of the Church. That is what the Jesuits celebrate to-day. In all their high places, in their secret recesses and vast assemblies, cathedrals and colleges, with incense, and song and organ peal, and procession, ban ners and sacramental service, they commemorate on this day the anniversary of their enjoyment of the loftiest throne the world ever saw; when the servant (as they pretend) of the meek and lowly Jesus stood on the neck of the mightiest Emperor, and looking abroad over all the earth, saw no monarch who could stay his hand or say, "Why doest thou so ?" The struggle is not over ; for in the nations where a free Bible, and a free school and a free press abound, there, here the successors of the men of the eleventh century are making one more fight. If we are true to our religion, it will be the last. HOLD UP YOUR HEAD. 127 HOLD UP YOUR HEAD : SPEAK LOUD AND PLAIN. During the travels of the last few weeks and months, it has been a duty or privilege, and sometimes both, to attend diverse conventions of able, learned, earnest or good men, in the interests of religion or science or politics. The first was the Presbyterian General Assembly, where five hundred ministers and elders met and spent a fortnight in the business of the Church. The second was the Scien tific Association. The other was a political State Conven tion to nominate a Governor and other officers for the November election. The ministers and elders often failed to make themselves heard when addressing the house. This failure did not spring from a want of lung power, or from any defect in vocal organs. It may be safely assumed that no sensible man who has a weakness or want of the faculty of speech, will undertake to make a dumb-show in the presence of a congregation whose time and patience are limited. But it is no less true that nine out of ten failed to be heard distinctly and usefully over the whole house. The fault was entirely with the speakers. They did not try to be heard. The few immediately around them might be conscious of their wis dom, but to the less favored, who sat in the more benighted regions, they were merely beating the air. This same fault is common in the pulpit. Ministers often let their voices fall toward the end of each sentence, and the last few words are quite inaudible to those in the distance. I once heard a pastor say : " I desire particular attention to the following notices" then he gave the notices, and the people sitting around me could not hear even the subject matter of the notices, much less the times and places named. In every theological seminary there should be a school for training the voice : teaching and requiring young men to hold up their heads, to speak loud and plain. If the greatest of Grecian orators confronted the waves of the sea to enable himself to master the roar of a great assembly, surely Chris- 128 1REN&US LETTERS. tian preachers ought to qualify themselves to speak so as to be heard. In the Assembly, and in all ministers' meetings, there are few men who speak out so loud and plain that they com- mand attention, and reach the understanding of their hearers by sound words with sound enough to be heard. Dr. Mus- grave is one of the men who are always heard. Because he speaks plainly, the house always listens. There are compen sations in Providence, and as he has not as perfect eyesight as many of his brethren, God has given him a better voice than any of them. Dr. Darling, of Albany, speaks distinctly and forcibly, and never fails to be heard with attention. The elders are rarely willing to speak up so as to reach the remote parts of the house. Mr. W. E. Dodge and Judge Drake were not heard for their much speaking, but when they did speak they were easily heard. Rev. Dr. Crosby is a model speaker in debate or in the pulpit. Would that all the Lord's proph ets would open their mouths wide when they prophesy. But if the religious people were afraid to speak out so as to be heard, what shall we say of the scientists ? Men of learning and renown, who had consumed midnight hours and oil in preparing papers for public reading, appeared to the weary hearer to be pouring a confidential communication into the ear of the patient President. Not a sentence of a half- hour or an hour-long treatise was audible twenty feet from the platform on which the modest master of art and science whispered his discoveries and calculations. Exhausted in vain attempts to gather wisdom from lips that the bees of Hymettus had kissed, I sometimes fell asleep, and after refreshing dreams, awoke to find the flow of silence going on with the same delicious calm that lulled me into repose again. Now these papers will be read with interest and profit in print, and the Association deserves the gratitude of the pub lic for important contributions. But there is very little advantage in getting an audience without giving it something to hear. It is not eloquence, oratory, the graces and charm of public speaking, for which I am pleading. Few, very few, HOLD UP YOUR HEAD. 12p have the gift. Few have been trained to the perfection of this highest of all arts. The greatest orator is the leader of men. It is not every man who is called to be a great speaker. But if a man cannot or will not speak so as to be heard, he is not called of God to speak in public. Whether a man of religion, letters, or science, if he cannot hold up his head, speak loud and plain, it were well that he had the grace of silence. But the politicians ! They met in the Town Hall. It was packed, piled, jammed. It was turbulent, restless, impatient, disorderly. But when a man was on his legs he spoke so as to be heard, or the multitude put him down. When they found that he had not the gift of voice or sense, they gave him rounds of applause that cheered his heart at first, but it went on and on until he found there was no chance for him, and sinking into the abyss, "the subsequent proceedings interested him no more." Then sprang to his feet no he had no feet, for both were shot off in the war but to his stumps, a little fellow, whose shrill voice rang like a clarion : the waves were stilled : his earnest, impassioned tones pierced the remotest corners of the house while he extolled his hero : and in seven min utes he fixed the flints of the convention and carried his man in triumph. All these political speakers spoke to be heard and so that they could be heard. No one of them dawdled with his subject : or talked as if he were half asleep : or let his voice down with a half-finished sentence: or suffered his cause to fail for lack of physical and intel lectual work. They threw their soul and body into the struggle. "They fought, like brave men, long and well." They compelled attention and got it. And I said to myself, "For what is all this?" And the answer came "They fight for men : for place : for power over one another : for office : the spoils : but they could not be more in earnest if heaven were to be stormed and immortal glory were the prize and price of victory." It was nearing midnight when I left them in the fight and stepped out beneath the stars. And the infinite distance 13 IREN^US LETTERS. between the visible and the invisible, the temporal and eternal, appeared in the light of those lamps of God. If min isters of Christ, elders in the Church, men who bear the responsibilities of God's work on earth, all who wear the name of Christian and rejoice in being redeemed, were as much in earnest as these political leaders, how they would push on the columns, until they had made Jesus the King of the Jews and Gentiles, and crowned him Lord of all. It is easy to say that sense is of more account than sound : that sound and fury signify nothing : and that the noisiest speakers are often the windiest : that word reminds me of a little story This summer two distinguished Scotch ministers were on their travels, and together worshipped in a cathedral where the organ was so rapturously lovely that one of the ministers, an earnest hater of instruments in public worship, was com pletely overcome by the power of the music. As they emerged from the temple, he said to his brother, " I will never speak another word against wind instruments, not even against you" But this is not to the point. My point is that preachers and all public speakers should speak loud enough to be heard by all the people in the house. As a hearer I sit before the preacher and see the movements of his lips, and as the man on the outside of the crowd said, when Senator Preston was speaking in the street, " He does the motion splendid," I say with the Apostle Paul, " If I know not the meaning of the voice, he that speaketh shall be a barbarian unto me." AMONG THE ICEBERGS. 131 AMONG THE ICEBERGS. The rush of the Arizona into an iceberg, and the awful peril of her passengers, bring to mind an old experience. In the month of March, 1854, I left Liverpool for New York in the steamer Baltic, Capt. Briggs, of the Collins line. It was my first voyage on a steamship, and naturally I was more sensitive to the several forms of danger than those are who have long been in the habit of " going down to the sea in ships." We had been out a few days only, I might say hours, before I was well satisfied that the captain would take the ship safely into port, if it required a year. The ship was new, stanch, and steady, and a well-built ship is as safe on the sea as a house is on the land. If this appears to be an extravagant remark, let me add that the best built dwellings are exposed to fire, lightning, hurricanes and mobs, and that a good ship is exposed to no more and no greater perils than these. The greatest danger to a ship arises from the incapacity or negli gence of those who navigate her, and against these dangers no human foresight is adequate to provide. You pay your money and take your choice of steamers according to the best information you can get of the judgment of the men who manage the line. They may be deceived. And you may be lost at sea. But the risks are not much greater than in cross ing Broadway a thousand times, or travelling by rail from Boston to San Francisco. Some years ago a stranger came into my office, and with out introduction went on to say " Long before the time when steamboats were on the river, I was going from New York to Albany on a sloop with several passengers. When we reached Tappan Zee, a great storm arose, and many were afraid the vessel would be overwhelmed. In the midst of the alarm a young and beautiful woman stepped from the cabin, and in a sweet voice, but without trembling, she said. In God's hands, we are as safe on the water as the land.' That lady became your mother. I have made her words my I3 2 IRENJEUS LETTERS. motto through, life : have watched you so far in yours, and thought you would be interested in this incident." Having said this, the stranger took his departure. And I will return to the Baltic and Captain Briggs. The weather proved bad. The voyage was disagreeable. There were only forty or fifty cabin passengers on board, giv ing us more room than company. But the silent, incessant vigilance of the commander inspired us all with a sense of serene security, so that we seemed to one another prisoners indeed, but sure to be well cared for, and in due time set at liberty. A week out, and we came into the region where ice bergs might be expected, whether the almanac said so or not. In the morning I was on deck with the Captain, and he called my attention to a blazing, white light, in the distance, like the reflection of a mighty mirror set in the horizon, or a pal ace of ice or glass coming down out of heaven. " That's an iceberg," he said calmly. I had never seen one, and rejoiced greatly that we were to make the acquaintance of one so soon. The captain did not share my enjoy ment. Drop a bit of ice into a tumbler of water. It floats, but almost the whole of it is below the surface. A small frac tion of the mass is out. As the gravity of ice is to water, so is the part above the surface to the part below. It makes no difference how large or how small the lump. It may be as big as a mountain, or as small as an apple, nine times as much of its weight will be under the water as above it. If, then, the huge mass stands like the Pyramid of Cheops out of the sea, it reaches nearly nine times as far below. Such was the immense cathedral-like, turreted, towering, stupendous pile as we gave it a wide margin, and passed it, glowing and bril liant in the clear, cold morning sun. With the knowledge of its proportions, and the necessary fate of a ship that should run upon it, we looked with awe while its beauty was fascin ating. There was " a weight of glory" in it. The iceberg which the Arizona sought to go through was seen from the Anchoria, and its dimensions were estimated at one hundred feet in height and five hundred feet in AMONG THE ICEBERGS. 133 breadth ; a solid block one thousand feet by five hundred, millions of solid feet of ice. The steamer President had gone from New York with a precious company on board, to cross the sea, and had gone down without a sign. Not a spar or plank, not a cry, not a rumor, had ever come to any shore to intimate the fate of one of that great company. Whether the eloquent Chaplain Cook- man had time to speak to them of the sailor's Friend, we never knew, but the general impression was, and still is, that, being very heavily laden and running against an iceberg, she went down in the twinkling of an eye. We shall know no more about it until the sea gives up its dead. We talked of this and other disasters all that day, and as another night set in, and we were still in the region which icebergs traverse, it seemed to me quite important that I should take care" of the ship. " What's to be done, Captain ?" I said. " Nothing but what was done last night." He then kindly explained to me the special watches that were set, the extra spies, the positions they occupied, the mode of changes, and the watchmen to watch the watchmen, and then he added : " I am here as I was through the night before, and shall be until we are out of all danger." At ten o'clock I went below and turned in, to meditate on the horrors of a night encounter with an iceberg ; and to roll with the ship till the morning. I thought of that " young and beautiful woman" whose words had comforted a stranger in many storms. I thought of Him who holds the waves and his children in his hands. And the faithful captain who is the agent of Divine Providence for my care and and and just then the morning sun was shining into my port-window and I had been sleeping soundly eight good hours. But the vigilance of the captain was not relaxed until his ship was safely in port. I was on the platform when Everett made his splendid oration at the inauguration of the Albany Observatory in 1 856 134 1REN/EUS LETTERS. and heard him relate this incident : " Coming across the Atlantic on a steamer, I asked the captain how near he could determine the precise location of his ship by the best obser vations. He said within about three miles. When we were supposed to be off Cape Race and were pacing the deck, I asked him how far he supposed the Cape to be, and he said, ' Perhaps three or four miles.' Thus, according to his own reckoning, we might be on the Cape any moment, for he could not tell within three miles where we were." Such a fact illustrates, and ought to compel, the extremest vigilance and carefulness, because after all is done that can be done, on sea or on land, the skill and the power of man have their limits, and our refuge is in God. AN INTERESTING BEGGAR. In the midst of my morning studies yesterday, when every moment is precious to a man of business or letters ; when every pastor or student wishes to be let alone ; when thoughtless or impudent people make it a point to call because they are quite sure to catch their victim in ; it was during these precious hours that I was summoned to give attention to a young lady who wished to see me on very urgent business. With that sense of being annoyed, if not irritated, which every hardworking man feels, when his favorite and only hours of solitary labor are rudely broken in upon by a rob ber of his time, I laid aside my pen that was just then trying to do its very best for you, dear friend, and reluctantly waited upon the young woman who had made this unsea sonable demand. She was neatly dressed, very small, delicately featured, invalid in appearance, pale, thin, tender-eyed. And thus looking, thus she spoke : " My mother and I are now in this city, in great distress AN INTERESTING BEGGAR. 13$ for the want of a small sum of money. Mother is a writer for the press ; she contributes to the literary periodicals and has several pieces in the hands of publishers, from whom she is in daily expectation of receiving money ; but we have been compelled to go from one lodging to another, cheaper and cheaper, until now we are to be turned into the street without shelter. We have had no breakfast to-day, and have not the means to pay for a morsel of food. In this dis tress, I have come to you" (and here came in some words of flattery which are omitted as not essential to the story), "and, if you will /ide, loosed from the moorings that for ages had defied the storm, had come down in one fell avalanche, and lay in wild confusion, like a world's wreck, at his feet. The stream had been driven from its wonted channel, no signs of a road were lefc to mark his way, but the bare mountains on each side were his guide, and he went on over the broken masses that were -oiled before him, expecting to find the Willey family at t3^ house at the lower end of the Notch. Arriving there, he'ikas alarmed, and so were the people of the neighborhood, s a\;n it was known that the Willey family \ 324 1REN&US LETTERS. had fled from their house, but had not been heard of below. The truth burst on the mind in an instant, that the deluge of earth and stone had destroyed them all ! The alarm was spread among the few inhabitants of that region, and they set out without delay to learn the fate of their friends. On reaching the spot where the catastrophe occurred, they sought a long time without finding the least evidence that any of them had perished, until at length the arm of one of the children was seen protruding through a mass of earth, and the dead body was speedily disinterred. Quite at a distance from this spot, another of the children was found on the surface without a wound, having evidently been swept away by the waters and drowned. The sad search was continued, and one after another of the lifeless bodies was dug out, until all but three were found ; the mother and one of the daughters side by side in death, and the rest some in one place and some in another, where they were caught and crushed by the descend ing current, or dashed along on its resistless wave. Three of them were never found. They sleep in their mountain grave; the wild winds sweep over their unmarked sepulchres, and the stranger walks upon the earth that covers them, ten, twenty, it may be, fifty feet below the surface. This brief recital of facts will enable the reader to draw his own picture of the scene of wild dismay that wrapt itself around this household in their last night of life. There is no doubt that they were roused by the sound of che descending torrents, and thinking the shanty which they had constructed the safest place, they fled thither; and the'cC, a miserable group, they huddled in darkness and terror, surrounded with more circumstances of horror than a wild fancy could well conjure, an awful storm of rain, a swollen river roaring before them, and then the awful cataract of roc'^s and trees and earth, a more terrible engine of wrath and woe than the icy avalanche of the Alps, comes pouring down upon them. I climbed up the side of the mountain jyD trace the course of this slide. It commenced, as the uf-^appy victims had supposed it would, immediately above ' beir little dwelling, and just before it reached the house ac sim rock parted the THE WHITE MOUNTAIN NOTCH, 325 avalanche, as may be represented by an inverted ^, one branch of the stream passing to the north of the house and crushing the stable with its dumb tenants, and the other, being the great mass of the slide, pouring to the south, where the fugi tives vainly sought their safety. Had they abode in the house, not a hair of their heads would have been hurt. The building was untouched. It was an ark to which they should have clung, but which they deserted to perish. The house still stands, though unfortunately for the melancholy associa tions that one loves to cherish with such a spot, it has been rebuilt, and is now kept as a small tavern. The family, whom I found there, had but lately moved in, and the good woman told me it was " dreadful lonesome," but she thought she "could stand it." So could I, if there were no other houses in the world to be let. Three of those victims have slept undisturbed fifty-four years. But for the art of printing, their burial would by this time have become a vague tradition, and in a century or two more would be forgotten. Then if the railroad had been run on the line of the Saco river, instead of going up the side of the basin, and the remains of this household and a few kitchen utensils had been found in excavating the earth, over which huge trees had grown, we should have been informed by learned paleontologists that pre-historic man had been found in the bottom of the White Mountain Pass, and the evidence by his side that he was a worker in metals, proba bly a contemporary of Tubal Cain. The printing-press has changed all that. Facts, with their dates, now go on imper ishable records, and theorists have to go behind printed pages to stultify the age we live in. When I was here in 1844 we travelled by stage, at the foot of these mountains. Now I am half way up, and whirling along the side, and looking down upon a vast waving sea of green : many shades of green : making an exquisite picture, and in the autumn, when the various colors come out as the leaves prepare to die, the view is said to be brilliant and gor geous beyond desciption. Observation cars are provided platforms with no sides to 326 JREN&US LETTERS. obstruct the sight, and on these the passengers sit who choose to take the prospect through whirling smoke and cinders, supposing it to be more enjoyable than to sit inside. But, anyway, in or out, the pass is grand, and has to be made before its remarkable beauty and sublimity can be under stood. THE MAN WHO HAD TO WAIT FOR A SEAT IN CHURCH. He writes a grumble to one of the daily newspapers. He says that he went to one of the large uptown, Fifth avenue churches, got there half an hour before the time for service to begin, had to stand by the door and wait, and wait, until the people assembled, and the pewholders were in, and then he was conducted to a vacant seat. He had to stand up so long that he became impatient and cross, and now complains of the practice which is not peculiar to the church he visited, but is the same in all churches that are not free. And he is not a stranger in the city, but had, this Sabbath morning, wandered away from the neighborhood of many churches, to hear a celebrated preacher. Such complaints are rarely made by strangers. A person from a hotel in the city, going to a popular church, expects to depend on the hospitality of the people whose church he visits, and he is thankful when, at the proper time, he is con ducted to a seat. There is no want of hospitality in any of our churches. In many of them the young gentlemen or ganize themselves into a corps of ushers, and take their posi tions in the several aisles, to show strangers to seats with the least possible delay. They perform this gratuitous and thankless service as a religious work, to promote the good of the church and of strangers. In other churches the trustees themselves, venerable men, assist in this office. But why is it necessary ? The few strangers in town, scattered among the several churches, would not require extra aid to find WAITING FOR A SEAT IN CHURCH. 327 seats. The doorkeeper of the house could easily attend to their wants. But the trouble comes of the habit that thou sands of people have, of going about to hear preaching with no settled place of worship. Nine-tenths of all the people standing at the door, waiting to be shown into pews, are resi dents of the city, and ought to have pews of their own. This grumbler, whose complaint has led to these remarks, ought to have been in his own pew in the church where his residence or his views made it convenient and profitable for him to attend. But he is one of thousands in this city who sponge on other people for the " means of grace." This is the way it works. We have tried various ways and means of " supporting the gospel " as it is called. Free churches, open to all comers, first come first served, have been tried, and some, on the same plan, are in operation now. That is one way. The plan has been a failure. Even the Roman Catholic churches, which are supposed to be practically free, exact a rent from the poorest working girls. The Methodists have pewed churches, whereas they formerly repudiated the system. In our Protestant churches the plan is to rent sittings, and from these rents to pay the necessary expenses of the church. And if a family or individual wishes to have a seat in any one of them, and is unable to pay for it, the applicant will be furnished with a good pew, free, or on such terms as he prefers. This is the constant practice in all our Protes tant congregations. No one, outside of those in charge, knows whether you are paying $150 a year for your pew, or only $1.50, or nothing. No family in this city lives so far from church, or is so poor, as not to be able to have a good seat in a Christian church. Thus the gospel is offered with out money to all who wish to hear. And going out into the highways, are visitors seeking those who neglect the sanc tuary, and persuading them to come in, so that no one per ishes, or lives, in want of an offer of the gospel. That is the plan for supporting the church in such a city as this. But we will now suppose that " the man who had to wait for a seat " was to have his way : his idea seems to be, 328 IREN^EUS LETTERS. that, as soon as he arrives at the door of any church in town, he may walk in, select such seat as best pleases him, plant himself in it, and "enjoy the gospel." If he has that right, others have it, and the church is at once given up to squat ters. Who will "hire" a pew if it is thus to be at the mercy of such interlopers as these who go from place to place to hear something new. The plan of sustaining the church by pew rents would break down in a year, if it were practically un derstood that no pewholder can have his own when he wants it. There is no church in this, or any other American city, where a stranger would not be instantly invited to a vacant seat in any pew so soon as his presence was discovered. In Lon don I have stood in the aisle, through the whole service, at the door of a pew in which there was room for two or three more persons, but the occupants would not invite me in, because I was a stranger. Etiquette probably forbade the courtesy. The French are said to be even more particular : at least, I have read of a Frenchman who would not give his hand to a drowning man because he had not been introduced to him. Our pews are reserved until the regular attendants are in them. Then the ushers fill up the vacant sittings with the waiting strangers. If a better plan can be devised, let us have it. Perhaps a convention of those who get their preach ing for nothing every Sabbath, might be held, and a standing committee appointed to suggest a plan to obtain their rights. I can imagine them in session, being called together by my grumbler, at the close of a service which they have attended in other people's pews. The grumbler would take the chair and open the meeting with prayer, thanking God that they are not as other people, and especially as those who build churches, pay for them, and worship in them : and praying that the time may soon come when churches will grow on the street corners and ministers will be fed with manna from heaven, and men may have the means of grace without its costing them a cent. Then he would draw from his pocket a series of resolutions which, being read, would be unanimously adopted ; to this effect : THE GAMBLERS AT MONACO. 329 Resolved, That it is unbecoming a Christian people to sit in their own pews while we want the use of them. Resolved, That the people who pay for the church and its support ought to be satisfied with having had the privilege, and now it is no more than fair that they should stand at the door and wait till we have taken their pews : then, if there are any left, they can come in and be seated. Resolved, That these resolutions be published in \b&New York Observer, provided the editors will pay us for the privilege. These resolutions express the views of that large class of church-goers who have no pews of their own for which they honestly pay. Instead of grumbling because they have to wait for a seat, they should take a pew, or part of one, in a church convenient to their residence: identify themselves with the congregation : go to work as Christian people : and then.only will they get the good of the gospel. THE GAMBLERS AT MONACO. From a sound sleep last night I was awakened by a sudden, strangely startling noise. I thought something had fallen in the room ; I struck a light, and finding everything in its place, went to the front window, opened the shutter, and looked out upon the street. All was silence and darkness. But in the morning (it was now a quarter past one) the body of a man was found upon the sidewalk. He had shot himself through the heart. It made me sad to think that I had heard, and perhaps was the only one who did hear, the sound of that death-shot. The man had come back to Nice from Monaco, ruined by gambling, and, in madness and despair, had made one leap from the hells of Monaco to another from which there is no escape. "It's nothing strange," said my friend who explained the suicide; "they often kill themselves, these gamblers ; and we have the same, or worse, tragedies every year. You noticed the sudden death of a young man last week : the papers said 33 IREN&US LETTERS. he committed suicide, but the facts were carefully concealed. A mere boy, he got in the way of gambling, till his fresh youth was blighted, and he murdered himself before he was 1 8 years of age. " Two years ago a young married couple came here ; they had apartments close by me : the wife had the money, and the man could spend only what she let him have : when she found that he was frequenting the tables at Monaco, she refused to give him more : he was already in debt, and in his desperation he killed her and then himself. The tragedy was hushed up as well as it could be, but it was one of many in the history of the infernal regions next door." This vortex of ruin has had a depressing influence upon Nice, as a winter resort. Thousands and tens of thousands come and enjoy the season ; the numerous and spacious hotels are crowded : and new ones are every year added to the number : but it is said that the growth of the city has been checked, and hundreds of families that formerly made this their home in the winter now seek other climes where such temptations are not presented. A standing notice in the daily papers says that no inhabit ants of Nice are permitted to enter the " saloons of play" at Monaco unless they are members of a Club ! This curious provision is very French. There are several fashionable clubs in Nice, answering to those in London and New York, and here, as there, it is understood that no gambling is allowed. But it is equally well understood that the members may gamble at their own sweet wills. And we have had our own amusement lately, reading in the papers the incidents at the clubs in New York, illustrating beautifully what the world means by a gentleman and man of honor. " The Hea then Chinee" has his pupils and friends in the highest circles of club life at home and abroad. The members of clubs at Nice are free to enter the " salles de jeu" of Monaco, where there is no play but for money, and where the company that run the machine make incredible sums out of the dupes that are drawn into their saloons. So the fly walks into the spider's parlor, and has his life-blood sucked out of THE GAMBLERS AT MONACO, 33* him. This rule of exclusion is merely a pretence : cards of admission can be obtained by any and every body who has money to lose, and the nuisance is just as great now as it ever was. A few years ago these gambling tables were set up in public at most of the great German and French watering- places. Homburg and Baden Baden were the chief cities of play. Public opinion has put them down, though they were the source of much gain to the governments that licensed them. Gambling is not now considered respectable except by the members of our fashionable clubs. This establish ment at Monaco is about the last that is left. I believe one is still licensed in an obscure Canton in Switzerland. And if you ask why it flourishes here in the midst of civilization and Christianity, I will tell you. Monaco is a kingdom, the smallest and most contemptible in the world. It is also one of the oldest, and perhaps the very oldest, in Europe. It dates from the tenth century. On the coast of the Mediterranean sea, at the foot of the Mari time Alps, three or four fishing and trading villages managed, with infinite and foolish sacrifices, to make themselves into a separate State, over which the Grimaldi family has held precarious sway for a thousand years. In the chances and changes that have modified the map of Europe, (in which Nice has been at one time in France, and then in Italy, and now in France again,) the insignificance of Monaco has been its shield. Two of the towns that once belonged to it have managed to get out, and Monaco now stands alone in its glory, the least and the meanest of kingdoms. Its entire population is less than 10,000. It consists of a small town on a remarkable promontory, inaccessible from the seaside, but making a snug harbor which separates the town from Monte Carlo. On this hill a splendid hotel is built, and beautiful villas are springing up. The Prince of this petty domain has a royal palace with splendid gardens around it: he has his castle, and guns and soldiers, and is the equal in position with any of the crowned heads of Europe. To keep up this style and state, he must have money : the taxes that his sub- 33 2 IRENMUS LETTERS. jects had to pay were so heavy as to lead to the revolt and secession of Mentone and Rocca Brun. There was every reason to fear the Monacans would follow the lead of their neighbors, and that some fine morning they might pitch the Prince into the sea so invitingly near. In this crisis the famous man Blanc, who was harvesting the gold of all the fools at Homburg and Baden, obtained a license to set up his tables at Monaco for the accommodation of the silly sheep that would come to Nice, and Mentone and Monaco, to be fleeced in winter. Mr. Blanc and his partners agreed, in con sideration of their license, to pay the Prince an annual sum of $75,000, and also to keep his city lighted with gas, streets in order, drainage perfect, and to make the place more and more attractive for the fashionable world. The climate is delightful, the King lives in Paris the most of the time, and a reign of peace and plenty is enjoyed under the general auspices of a nest of gamblers who make vast sums of money out of their contract with the King. I am told that their expenditures in city improvements and taxes amount to a thousand dollars a day ; and this will help you to some idea of the money that must be lost by the visitors. There are five or six large tables, with as many games of various kinds, at which an indefinite number of people may play, and these games go on steadily, day and night, and the stream flowing, almost without a turn, into the bank, or the bag, of the com pany. Women and men, young and old, English and Ameri can, French, Italians, Germans and Russians, Orientals swar thy and passionless in their looks, all play, all lose, all play again, for it is the nature of this vice (of all vices) that indul gence stimulates the passion, blunts the edge of reason, like the horse-leech cries "more, more," and never says it is enough. Under the guise of Christian charity, many churches in America, and many benevolent organizations, in the spirit of this Monaco company, set up lotteries and raffles to tempt the people to risk a little money in the hope of getting more. So this Monaco company give large donations to religious and charitable objects, hoping thereby to take the curse from MADE WITHOUT A MAKER. 333 their business and conciliate public favor. The principle of their accursed trade, covered with blood and loaded with the misery of ruined families and the souls of its victims blighted in this world, damned in that to come, is just the same as that by which money is won at a church fair. MADE WITHOUT A MAKER. Opening an encyclopedia, in pursuit of knowledge, my attention was drawn to the word protoplasm. I read its defi nition, and then a long and weary essay on the subject. Perhaps you will say the same of this letter. It may be weary, it shall not be very long. The book said that protoplasm comes from two Greek words meaning_/?r.y/ and form, a term applied to the supposed original substance from which all living beings are devel oped, and which is the universal concomitant of every phe nomenon of life. All that is comprehended for brevity under the term life, " the growth of plants, the flight of birds, or a train of thought :" that is to say, vegetable life, brute life, and human life, " is thus supposed to be caused by corporeal organs which either themselves consist of protoplasm, or have been developed out of it." The first living things are called moners, which are made out of pure protoplasm: that and nothing more. You must put a pin there. Not to prick the moner, but to mark the place in the process of getting something out of nothing. Who made the protoplasm is not "supposed." It is supposed that moners are made of proto plasm. When the colored preacher in Alabama spoke of the first man being made of wet clay and set up against the fence to dry, one of his doubting hearers asked out loud, " Who made the fence?" The preacher bade him be silent, for " such questions would upset any system of theology." The author proceeds : moners are " the simplest living beings we can conceive of as capable of existing," and " they 334 IREN&US LETTERS, perform all the functions which in their entirety constitute, in the most highly organized animals and plants, what is comprehended in the idea of life." You see it is becoming interesting. In the simplest conceivable being, all the func tions of the most fully developed man are found. You thought that it required infinite power and wisdom to make a being in whom resides a soul of boundless reach : but now you are told that in a moner don't forget what a moner is the most highly organized system of animal life and func tions exists. Some of these wonderful fellows, the moners, live "in fresh water," " others in the sea." As a general rule " they are invisible to the naked eye," but " some are as large as the head of a pin." Put another pin here so as to see its head. Some " are smooth :" others have " numerous delicate threads radiating in all directions." Sixteen varieties of these curious first things are catalogued. Haeckel has done it. He has also shown that although moners are the " sim plest living beings we can conceive of as capable of existing" and " consist solely of protoplasm," yet protoplasm is not a "simple" substance, but consists of carbon 50 to 55 per cent, hydrogen 6 to 8, nitrogen 15 to 17, oxygen 20 to 22, and only i to 2 of sulphur. Thus it is proved that the simplest of all conceivable beings is composed of a compound including five other substances. You might put another pin there, for it becomes more curiously entertaining as we proceed. We have now seen that the origin of life was, first, pure protoplasm, secondly, moners are made of it solely, and themselves per fectly simple : and now protoplasm made of five totally dis similar constituents rolled into one. According to the plastid theory the great variety of vital phenomena is the consequence of the infinitely delicate chemical difference in the composition of protoplasm, and it considers protoplasm to be the sole active life substance. The author goes on to say that the protoplasm theory received a wide and thorough illustration from the study of rhizopods which Ernst Haeckel published in 1862, and its complete application in a subsequent work " by the same na turalist." " Haeckel," our author says, discovered the " sim- MADE WITHOUT A MAKER. 335 plest" of organisms in 1864, and Haeckel elaborated "the extremest philosophical consequences of the protoplasm the ory." And our author having quoted Haeckel seven times, closes his essay by referring, among other authors, to five several and distinct works by Haeckel. Being by this time in the spirit of inquiry into the origin of things, I sought the authorship of our author's treatise, and, in a list of authors in the beginning of the book, it was assigned to Haeckel ! How like it is to the thing it treats ! Here is protoplasm illustrated. Whenever our author would illustrate any point of importance, he tells us what Haeckel says : and he and Haeckel are one and the same ; just as protoplasm begets moners which are solely protoplasm, and the simplest con ceivable beings, yet solely composed of one substance itself made up of five. And this is philosophy ! A speaker in Congress began by saying grandiloquently : "The generality of mankind in general are disposed to oppress the generality of mankind in general." "You had better stop," said one near to him, " you are coming out at the same hole you went in at." The philosophers of the Haeckel and Huxley school argue in a circle with the same result. Dr. Lundy tells us of a Hindoo picture of a god with his great toe in his mouth, thus having no beginning or end: and the Doctor says that " the toe in his mouth represents his incomprehensible spiritual nature." The circle out of which is evolved the plastid theory of life has the same incompre hensibility that represents its idea of self-existence by an old man kissing his big toe. But is there no point, no moral, no great truth to be devel oped out of this mass of contradiction and absurdity ? What is the necessary deduction from the moner theory of life ? Logically and intentionally the inference is that, in the human being, there is no life that has not the same origin and substance and function with that of vegetables and beasts. These teachers teach that " a train of thought" " is composed of corporeal organs" and comes of protoplasm. Thus man and beast and potatoes are put on the same level, 33 6 IRENsEUS LETTERS. having no functions except corporeal, and with no principle of life that survives the dissolution of the corpus. This is the opinion of many in our day. It is also as old a theory as Epicurus who, in his garden-school at Athens 300 years before Christ, denied the immortality of the soul and taught the doctrine which Democritus had elaborated in his cos mogony, and which was taught by Leucippus of Abdera, a hundred years before Epicurus was born, and held by the wits of Egypt a thousand years before. They called it the atomic theory : that matter is self-existent and originally composed of atoms, each atom having power of motion, and these atoms went whirling about like the bits of glass in a ka^ido- scope, till they stuck together in their present forms. This is as rational and philosophical as protoplasm, and is cer tainly its germ out of which moners and other monsters are developed. How beautiful in contrast is the faith of the Christian. It is revealed to us in the Bible. The Lord God made man and " breathed into his nostrils the breath of life ; and man became a living soul." iNot so did he make a horse or a bird. Materialists, Epicureans, Haeckelians and others of that school, are consistent in putting equal value upon the life of a beast and a woman, or even in esteeming the former more highly if their tastes so lead them. But we who believe that Christ died for human beings only, and that they who are in Him become partakers of a divine nature also, see in man a dignity, sanctity and glory excelled only by the angels and Him " in whom we live and move and have our being." ARGUING WITH A POKER AND A HAMMER. A fearful tragedy commands my pen as I sit down to write this letter. On the banks of the Hudson river, in the midst of a Christian community, and just before Christmas last, the herald of peace and good will, a bloody drama was per formed. ARGUING WITH A POKER AND A HAMMER. 337 Above the village of Kingston and below Saugerties, on the western bank of this goodly river, is a region of country known as Flatbush. Two Christian churches, the one Re formed Dutch, the other Methodist Episcopal, flourish in this rural region. Mr. and Mrs. Rittie were a married pair, in middle age ; he the sexton of the Reformed Church, she an active member of the Methodist. However well they may have agreed on other matters, they were bound to differ on questions of faith and practice that distinguish the two communities, one Cal- vinistic, the other Arminian. How much either knew about doctrine is not stated. Both were very much set in their way. Arguments were frequent and earnest. Words how ever made no very deep impression. The more they argued the more thoroughly convinced they were of the soundness and scripturalness of their respective opinions. Such a result is not unusual. John Knox and John Wesley could not have been more decided in their religious beliefs. It grew worse and worse. Breath was spent in vain. It generally is when disputants are warm, and this man and wife waxed warm, even in winter, when they fought the fight of faiths. It was not a good fight. And it is quite likely that the man usually got the worst of the argument. Certainly he worried the most over it, as would not have been the case had he been the victor in the war of words. Coming home from a hard day's work, he was invited by his loving spouse to go in the evening to the prayer meeting which her church people were holding, within half a mile of their own dwelling. To this kind invitation he replied, "No, Sarah, I am too tired to walk so far to-night : let's go to Swart's," a near neighbor. To which she answered, " No, if you can't go to prayer meeting with me, I am not going to Swart's with you." This she said in a sharp tone. It is affirmed of her that she had " a tongue in her head." People generally have ; and so far as my knowledge of natural his tory extends, husbands have tongues in their heads as well as wives ; yet it is more frequently remarked of women than of men, that they are gifted with this unruly member. They 33 8 IREN^EUS LETTERS. certainly do not enjoy a monopoly of it, though their skill in its use may give them the advantage in linguistic discussion. Being unable to convince the head of the house that it was his duty to go to prayer meeting with her, she went without him. We have no report of the part she took in the meeting, but, being an active, energetic sister, who had walked half a mile to the place, and was considerably excited when she started, it is probable that she exercised her gift of tongue according to her ability and opportunity. She returned home, and Martin, her husband, was yet at the neighbor's, visiting his friends. She might have called there and walked home with him. But such was not her disposition. She retired to their apartment, shut the door, locked it and fastened him out. What business had he to go out visiting while she was at prayer meeting : she would teach him a thing or two. In due time he came home, but the door was shut. He could get into the hall, but not into the room. He knocked and called, but the devout woman was deaf and dumb now. The Calvinist was discomfited. If she had argued with him through the keyhole, it is quite likely he would have given up a point or two of his tenets, for the sake of an armistice. But she scorned to take advantage of his embarrassment, and he made his way to the only refuge, a miserable garret, where, without bed or fire, he passed a bitterly cold night, in darkness, silence and solitude. He nursed his wrath, and that may have helped to keep him warm. Down stairs he came in the morning, and the scene that ensued when this loving pair met at the fireside, is in ferred from the lines and marks left upon their respective heads. The heads of argument seem to have been these. She went for him and began to argue with a poker, giving him a blow over the left cheek bone ; and making so deep an impres sion that the argument was found to fit exactly into the place for which it was intended. He replied with a hammer. Whether he studied up this subject in the midnight medita tions of the garret and came down prepared for this new mode of answering her, does not appear, but he was ready with the hammer and smote her on the head therewith, until ARGUING WITH A POKER AiVD A HAMMER. 339 he supposed he had finished her. Then suddenly a great horror came on him, as the neighbors rushed in and found him standing over the body of his wife. He stepped into the chamber from which she had barred him, and put an end to his own life with a razor. That is a little drama, in a rural village, in humble cottage life, this winter. But it is, in miniature, what has filled cities, and lands, and the world with violence, woe and blood. We are but learning now the principles of toleration, the duty and beauty of letting people have their own way of thinking and believing, if they cannot be converted to a better way by reason and love. I have compared notes on the subject with friends of late, and we agree in this : that the older we grow, the more clearly, intelligently and firmly we hold those opinions we have had from youth upwards, and the more cheerfully willing we are that others should hold opinions opposed to ours. The importance of controversial theology and of contending earnestly for the faith is not questioned; but the folly of arguing with an opponent, disputing with men or women about their religious belief, and emphatically getting excited about it, is so clear to me now, that the tongue seems almost as dangerous a weapon as a poker or a hammer. Reason has far less to do with the guidance of human opinions than we are apt to admit. Education, feeling, exam ple, prejudice, self-interest, any one of these has more power with many persons than logic. The parent who lives a godly life and by the sweetness of his Christian spirit, his habitual kindness to companion, children, servants and friends, illus trates the power of the faith he professes, will more surely convince his household of the truthfulness of his religious opinions, than he will by hammering their heads, or arguing at the table with every guest who does not believe as he does. Train children in the doctrines and duties of the gospel, rising up early and teaching them, show their power in a holy and happy life, patience in trials, energy in useful work, and hope in the worst of times, and children will not depart from the faith of their fathers. It is time to lay aside the poker and the hammer, the spear 34 1R&NJ&U3 LETTERS. and the sword : to hang the trumpet in the hall and study war no more. The world's great conqueror is the Prince of Peace. I cannot convince my neighbors that they are wrong, but I will love them, if they love Him who loves us both. Let us live and let live. And so much the more as we see the day approaching when there shall be neither Greek nor Jew, neither Barbarian nor Scvthian : for Christ is all in all. ANNA DICKINSON ON THEATRES. The theatre has a new champion in the field, Miss Anna Dickinson, who won much fame on the platform as a lec turer and made a dead failure as a player on the stage. But she is not to be put down, and with a remarkably forgiving spirit, she has returned to the platform to advocate the stage. She is so stage-struck that in her delirium she de clares the stage more a power in the world than the press or the church. She takes up the old and long since exploded doctrine, that the theatre is a school of morals, and upholds it as one of- the great reforming agencies of the age, and all ages. Anna is behind the age. All the world knows better, and talks better, and no sensible man of to-day pretends to defend the theatre for such a silly reason as that. Alexandra Dumas, McCready, Edwin Booth, and such as they, know more about theatres than Miss Dickinson, and they tell a very different story. Alexandre Dumas said it is no place for our wives and daughters. He thought little of morals for men, but as it is nice to have women's morals kept as nearly right as may be, he would not have them frequent the play. This was the ground maintained by the great English actor, McCready, whose rivalry with Edwin Forrest culminated in the Astor Place riot of 1849. He pre ferred that the ladies of his family should not frequent the theatre, though thereby he got his money and his fame. ANNA DICKINSON ON THEATRES. 34* Edwin Booth, the greatest of living American actors, has recently given his written testimony that he never permits (Miss Dickinson never permits any man to say that of her) his " wife or daughter to witness a play, without previously ascertaining its character." I never come so near losing patience with others, who have the same right to their opinions that I have to mine, as when they assume and assert that the theatre, as it is and has been, is worthy of the encouragement and support of good men and women. I know that honorable and good men have said so. I have heard preachers plead for the theatre, on the platform surrounded by players. So 1 have read in the purest and best of the daily papers sneers at " educated persons" who denounce the theatre. And, at last, a woman comes to the footlights and declares theatres better than churches ! ! Now I am no bigot, nor purist, and wish to have as wide a charity and as much liberality as any honest man should have. I do not quarrel with a man for holding conscien tious convictions, religious opinions, views of right and duty, quite opposed to mine. To his own Master he stands or falls. I will dine, as my Master did, with publicans and sinners. And if good men will frequent theatres it is their lookout : I do not criticise them for so doing. It may do them no harm. If they frequent theatres, why may not 1 try to show that they are evil, only evil, and that continually? If Anna Dickinson thinks theatres better than churches, and longs to be a play actor, which she never can be, why may I not quote the words of the greatest lady player of the Ameri can stage, Fanny Kemble, who wrote these words : " A business which is incessant excitement and fictitious emotion seems to me unworthy of a man, a business unworthy of a woman. Neither have I ever presented myself before an audience without a shrinking feeling of reluctance, nor withdrawn from their presence without thinking the excite ment 1 had undergone unhealthy and the personal exhibition odious" When she declares it "a business unworthy of a woman," Fanny Kemble utters the thought of the purest and best of 342 IREN^EUS LETTERS. her sex. When I was only ten years old I read in the Latin of Tacitus that the women of Germany were preserved in purity and kept from danger by being excluded from theatres. The evils of theatres are to be learned quite as much from Plato and Aristotle as from the Bible or any other book. Plato says : " Plays raise the passions and pervert the use of them, and of consequence are dangerous to morality." Aristotle held that " the seeing of comedies ought to be forbidden to young people, until age and discipline have made them proof against debauchery." Ovid, a poet so licentious that we had expurgated editions of his works, advised Augustus to suppress theatres as a great source of corruption. But modern theatres are better than the ancient : and are better now than they were twenty-five or fifty years ago. Just so. But they are not pure, never were and never can be. George Ticknor said of the Paris stage : " The old French drama contained often gross and indelicate phrases and allusions, but the tone of the pieces, as a whole, was generally respectable. The recent theatre reverses all this. It contains hardly any indecorous phrases or allusions, but its whole tone is highly immoral. I have not yet seen one piece that is to be considered an exception to this remark. I know nothing that more truly deserves the reproach of being immoral and demor alizing than the theatres of Paris and the popular literature of the day." And the theatres of Paris are to-day just as pure and moral as those of New York. We have the French plays translated regularly and put on our stage, and the nastier they are the more popular, as the coffers prove. Even Anna Dickinson, an unmarried woman, names Camille as a moral play ! ! ! Mr. Palmer, the well known manager of the Union Square Theatre of this city, said to the Tribune: "The American turns his back on the Shakespearean drama in the theatre, not because it possesses too much thought for him, but because its thoughts are too nastily expressed to suit his civilized taste." But the drama of Shakespeare is called the legitimate, and ANNA DICKINSON ON THEATRES. 343 the stage on which his plays are acted is the model school of virtue and manners ! Miss Dickinson declares the stage more powerful to-day in forming the morals of the age than the church ! So idle a remark is scarcely to be reconciled with the possession of one's senses. The stage cannot exist except in large cities. And here, in the largest city on the Continent, it could not survive a year but for the strangers within our gates. The number of people attending theatres is a mere handful com pared with those who go to church. She says she has been fifteen times to see one play. Probably thousands have done the same, and that shows how few people there are who go. And if the opinions of Plato and Edwin Booth, of Aristotle and McCready, of Tacitus and Palmer, of Fanny Kemble and Ovid, are unitedly equal to the opinion of Miss Anna Dick inson, I may be excused for believing, in my innocent igno rance, that on the whole the Church is rather a better school of morals than the play-house. 1 would not be very positive as to a fact that a woman may deny. But having been a somewhat diligent student of history, especially in that department of it which treats of the progress of civilization, religion and morals, through the brilliant periods of Grecian and Roman life and glory, and in the rise of Western Empires and the development of modern art, science and humanity, and along that track of time which has seen the birth, growth, power, and benedic tion of ten thousand institutions to make this world better, purer and happier, to relieve human suffering, to save fallen men and women from the deeper hell of their lost name and their unspeakable shame ; having seen in Italy and in Rus sia, in Spain and Egypt even, institutions of mercy from which flow streams to make glad the desert of the world, I have observed they all had their rise, nourishment, and life in the Church. Not in my Church only, but in every Church that teaches the immortal destiny of man : the life of God in the human soul ! But never, never did I see or hear of one memorial of virtue or benevolence intended to bless poor, sick, dying humanity, that had its origin in that boasted 344 1REN&US LETTERS. school of virtue, called the theatre ! And I challenge all the champions of the stage, without distinction of race, sex, color, or previous condition, to point to any substantial good thing ever wrought by its influence. I speak not of actors, of whom many are good, benevolent men and women. But of the stage as an institution. As long ago as in the time of that poor King Charles I., a man named Prynne made a book containing a list of authorities, almost every name of eminence in the heathen and Christian world, bear ing testimony against the stage: the Acts of 54 councils and synods; 71 ancient fathers; 150 Papal and Protestant authors, philosophers and poets, and the legislative enact ments of Pagan and Christian States, nations, emperors and kings. But in spite of all these testimonies the stage lives. Just as ali other vices live. It is a running sore in the bosom of society. And sores are always running. So long as human nature loves evil rather than good, vice rather than virtue, a lascivious play like Camille, or a dirty opera like Travtata, will have admirers among the sons and daughters of men. But that only pro'ves that the play is carnal, sold under sm. It always was a school of vice. The shores of time are peo pled with the shades of its victims. To reform it is to break it down. Purify the stage, and as it falls its dying cry will be the words of the greatest master of the drama : " FARE WELL ! OTHELLO'S OCCUPATION'S GONE." OUR FRIENDS IN HEAVEN. So many of my friends have recently gone to heaven, it is quite natural that thoughts of them and their surroundings should be frequent. And certainly they are very pleasant. If there was ever a time when religion and death and the life beyond were subjects of sad reflection, to be indulged only as a duty, such a time has passed away. It is now as cheer- OUR FRIENDS IN HEAVEN. 345 ing and agreeable to think of friends (and the more loved in life the more pleasant) enjoying the pleasures of the heavenly state, as to hear from others travelling in foreign lands, rejoicing in scenes and associations that satisfy their longing desires. The wisest and best of Roman moralists and philoso phers enjoyed such thoughts of their friends gone before them into the unseen and eternal, and they anticipated with fond emotions a blissful reunion and refreshment in the society of the great and good. And with life and immortality brought to light by Revelation, what was to those ancient pagans a dreamy speculation scarcely worthy of being called a faith, is to us reality. Our faith is the SUBSTANCE of things hoped for, the EVIDENCE of things not seen. We have thus entered already upon the inheritance, so that we have the good of it and part of the glory, as the heir to a vast estate or a throne enjoys, long before he comes into possession, the reflected honors and pleasures awaiting. Names and faces and forms of friends who have within the past year preceded me into their rest, have been peopling the cheerful chambers of memory this evening. It is a rough night outside, and the day has been a weary one ; but now a soft fire-light fills the room and the study lamp is shaded, so that the silence and shadows invite converse with the spirit ual and unseen. And the departed of the year have joined themselves with the many who finished their course before them, and are now in the midst of worship and feasts and friendship in the mansions of the blest. How pleasant their memories now ! How the heart gladdens with the remem brance of the joys on earth and the hopes of higher in heaven ! Just about twelve years ago (it was Dec. 16, 1859) I had some friends at dinner with me : a larger number than are often gathered at my table ; but they were friends, valued friends, some of them very dear. It was a feast of fat things, and six hours flew away like so many moments, in that feast of reason and flow of soul, making an evening never to be forgotten here or hereafter. And of that dinner company, EIGHTEEN men are now in another state than this, their bodies 340 1R&NMUS LETTERS. mouldering in the ground, their souls gone to God ! ! ! Eigh teen of my companions, associates in business, in the Church, in public and private life, personal friends, eating and drink ing with me in one company, and now all gone ! I stopped just here and went to a drawer and took out a sheet of paper, on which is a diagram of the table and the seat that each one occupied, with his name written in it. The links of memory are brightened, so that their voices, their pleasantries, their very words of wit and wisdom, sparkling and bright, come flashing and shining, as on that glad and genial evening. At my right was the stalwart Edgar of Bel fast, and on my left the polished Dill of Derry ; and just be yond was the elegant and eloquent Potts ; and next to him the courtly and splendid Bethune ; S. E. and R. C. Morse, three years sundered by death, but just now reunited to be sundered never again ; and there was Krebs, himself a host, my companion in foreign travel and a most delightful friend ; and Murray, the " Kirwan " of the Observer, brightening the brightest with the humor of his native isle ; and Cooke, who was with me in Switzerland ; and that wonderful astronomer, Mitchell, who now looks down to study the stars ; and my friend Hoge, with love like that of woman ; and my brother, P. E. Stevenson. [Since I first wrote these lines, my guests have continued to go to heaven ; and I have now to add the names of Prof. S. F. B. Morse, J. R. Damson, James Stuart, Alexander Stuart, Joel Parker, D.D., G. D. Abbott, D.D., John Laidlaiv, and Rev. William Adams, D.D., L.LD.] A brilliant company ; an acquisition to the skies ; stars all of them ; who finished their course with joy, and then entered into the joy of their Lord. It would seem that the earth could not spare all those men, and keep right on. But they are in fitting company, with the Lamb in the midst of them. " There is the throne of David, And there from toil released, The shout of them that triumph, The song of them that feast." And there is a younger company. All these were heroes OUR FRIENDS IN HEAVEN. 347 and prophets and kings, but the children who have gone up there are children always. O blessed thought ! They were with us long years ago, and they are in our hearts the same playful little ones they were when the Father of us all asked them to come to his house. And they are his children and our children forever. That little one to whom David said he should go, is still the child of David, not an infant of days, for there are no days nor nights in heaven, but the saint-child radiant in immortal beauty. " O ! when a mother meets on high The babe she lost in infancy, Hath she not, then, for pains and fears, The day of woe, the watchful night, For all her sorrows, all her tears, An overpayment of delight ?" Heaven's floor is covered with them. Of such is its king dom. They have been going there flying before they could walk, carried there by the angels all these thousands of years. Yours are there. There, did I say? We do not know where the place is, nor what a place is for spirits to dwell in. They may be near us, around us, ministering spirits sent forth to do us good, to strengthen us. They, or thoughts of them, have been so pleasantly with me to-night, that it is good to be here. It would be good, doubtless better, to be with them where they are, and with Him who has them near His face. There is nothing sad, depressing, in such com munion. But it is getting late. The fire is low on the hearth. To-morrow will soon be here ; its duties require fresh life : and as death brings life eternal, so sleep makes new life for the day to come. 34^ 1REN&US LETTERS. WHEN NOT TO LAUGH, Walter Scott, the great novelist and poet, the prince of genial good fellows, as fond of humor and hearty laughter as any man, on his dying bed, said to his son-in-law, " Lockhart, read to me." " What book shall I read ?" asked his son. "There is but one book for a dying man," replied the poet ; " read from the Bible." Walter Scott was fond of fun, he enjoyed humor, was a splendid story teller ; and he was a Christian believer, and his inner sense was enlightened to know and feel the fitness of things, the proprieties of time and place. To ask for a funny story, for something to make him laugh when he was dying, would have been as abhorrent to the tastes of Walter Scott, as to hear a joke cracked at his mother's funeral. Rev. Robert Collyer, in a recently published sermon on " Faith and Fear," closes up with the following story : Talking the other day about some grand, old saints that we had known, we spoke of one now dead, and a brother said, " Did you hear how he died ? He was a long time sick, you know, and in great pain, and when he felt the* end had come, he sent for his two sons. " ' Boys,' he said, ' I am nearly through. I just wanted to see you and say good-bye.' " They sat down beside his bed, and then he said, ' One of you read to me.' "So one of them got the Bible. 'Nay, not that,' the old man said, quietly, ' I don't need that now. I got it all into my heart years ago. My feet are planted on the promises. Everything that Book teaches for me has come clear. My trunk is packed, my ticket all right, and I am just going to start ; but now will you not get something new, pleasant and bright ? I have had a hard struggle with my pain, and would like to laugh just another time. I know it will do me good. ' " And so one of the boys got some bit of sweet humor and read that ; and it was so, that while the light was shining in his eyes at the pleasant thoughts, they changed and caught the light that flashes from the immanent glory, and he was with the angels." Grand old man ! I was glad to hear that story. Trunk packed, ticket WHEN NOT TO LAUGH. 349 made out, feet planted on the promises, just another ripple of laughter after the hard pain, and then the rest that remains. These two stories are in striking contrast. Scott wanted nothing so much as the Bible when he came to die. Collyer's saint wanted no more of the Bible, but something to make him laugh. Collyer rejoices in his saint : we rejoice in the prince of novelists. Scott's was the faith of a Christian : Collyer's that of a pagan. Humor is a good thing. Fun is healthful. We do not play enough, do not laugh enough. There is a time for every thing, and the wisest of men has told us, and God told him to tells us, " There is a time to laugh." So there is a time to dance, and a time to weep, and a time to die. Everything is beautiful in its time. The Lord made it so. Humor and pathos have their dwelling places very near each other, and of them it may be said as Dryden said of wit and madness, " Thin partitions do their bounds divide." Or as Pope said, " What thin partitions sense from thought divide." And some men who are fullest of tears when sympathy with suffering asks for tears, are also overflowing with fun and frolic when laughter is in order. I have a broader sympathy with laughter than Pope, who wrote those familiar lines: " Eye Nature's walks, shoot folly as it flies, And catch the living manners as they rise : Laugh where we must, be candid where we can, But vindicate the ways of God to man." "Alas, poor Yorick," saith Shakespeare in Hamlet. "I knew him ; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy." But I confess that when I read that sentence inscribed upon a tombstone, as the best epitaph that admiring friends could suggest and carve for posterity, I felt that it were better to live for something higher than merely to laugh and make others laugh. And as I read on the stone that memorial of 35 1RENSEUS LETTERS. a man of wit, I could not but recite from the same play and the same scene, those other words of the greatest of poets : "Where be your jibes now? Your gambols ? Your songs? Your flashes of merriment, that were wont to set the table on a roar ?" George P. Morris was a poet and a wit and a genial table companion, and he wrote of the Bible in one of his songs : " In teaching me the way to live, It taught me how to die." And my old friend and the friend of everybody who loves green fields and running brooks, and to sit all day in the shade of great trees, fishing or reading or thinking my friend of other days, Izaak Walton, said of the Bible : " Every hour I read you kills a sin, Or lets a virtue in to fight against it." And I love old George Herbert more even than 1 do his friend Izaak Walton ; and Herbert writes: " Stars are poor books, and oftentimes do miss ; The Book of stars lights to eternal bliss." That's my idea, precisely. And when I come to die, much as I have enjoyed Joe Miller and Percy, and those other benefactors of the race who have made us laugh betimes in spite of ourselves ; much as 1 am indebted for health and spirit to do the hard work of life, to the great humorists of this and other days, whose books are looking down upon me from long rows of shelves while I write, and whose covers make me smile when I think of the good things that are within ; yet I say, when I come to die, 1 will not want my friends to take a jest book or a comic paper for a joke to make me laugh as I step into the river. Laughing is very well when dining, not when dying. " Jesus, the music of Thy name Hath overpowering charms ; Scarce shall I feel death's cold embrace, If Christ be in my arms. WITH A PIRA TE IN HIS CELL. 35 I " Then when ye hear my heart-strings break, How sweet the minutes roll, A mortal paleness on my cheeks, And glory in my soul." Read to me from the words of Him who saith, " He that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live." Collyer's saint would have something " pleasant and bright;" Hot the Bible. If you would bring me something pleasant and bright, lift the vail and show me a ''pure river of water of life, clear as crystal," and let me hear the voice that says : There shall be no night there the city hath no need of the sun, nor of the moon to shine in it her light is like unto a stone most precious. It seems to me that is pleasant and bright. The best joke I ever heard would not make me so happy in dying as to hear my Master's words, " Enter thou into the joy of thy Lord." WITH A PIRATE IN HIS CELL. Thirty-six years ago, in the City Prison, called the Tombs, from the Egyptian style and the gloomy look, was confined a man under sentence of death. He was a pirate, bearing the singular name of Babe. It was doubtless a ficti tious name, but the public knew him by no other. I had heard much of this pirate: the papers of the day had startling accounts of his career. His trial in this city had resulted in his conviction under the United States laws, and, after two reprieves, he was now waiting the day of his execution. He insisted strongly that he could produce evi dence to establish his innocence if he had time granted him. Then it was also alleged that the odd name of Babe con cealed the name of a distinguished family in New York, the mention of which, even at this day, would startle the hearer, so well is it known to the religious world. This fact inten sified my interest in the man, and I went to the prison in the 352 IREN&US LETTERS. hope of being permitted to see him, and to try to do him good. The keeper led me to the tier of cells, and the murderers' row, where such as he were confined. He was allowed to sit outside of his cell, but was carefully watched ; and as I came upon the stairs he rose, entered his cell and shut the door. This was discouraging, but I asked the keeper to go to the cell and say to him that "a young minister would like to pay him a visit, if it would be agreeable." The keeper complied, and soon returned with word that Babe would be glad to see me. I stepped through the low portal. He swung the iron door back to its place with a clang, and I was alone with the pirate in his cell. The sensation was novel, and not pleasant. I had often conversed with convicts through the grating of the cell door. I had taught six convicts to read by giving them lessons at the hole in their cell doors, and they had recited to me whole chapters of the gospel, not a letter of which did they know until they were thus taught in prison. -But this was the first time I had been shut in with a convict. He gave me the only chair, while he sat on the bunk. As I took off my hat, he asked me to keep it on, as the cell was cool. Before me was a handsome young man, twenty-two years old; tall, well formed, a model of strong muscular action, with a bright eye and intelligent face, and his whole look and bearing indicated genteel birth and manners. I said : " My dear sir, I have not intruded upon you with any feel ing of idle curiosity; I come as a friend, a Christian friend, to speak with you of your precious soul." " I am glad to see you," he replied, with a clear, pleasant voice. I then asked him what views he had of the future, when he thought of the possibility that he might, before a great while, be called into another state of being. With wonderful coolness, indicating total unconcern, he replied : " My views, I suppose, are the same as yours or those of any other man. My mind is just as much at ease as that of any man in New York, but" and here he clenched both fists and brandished his arms while he said: WITH A PIRA TE IN HIS CELL. 353 " I am just as innocent of the crime for which I am shut up here, as you are, but I am pursued* by a set of blood hounds who mean to get me hanged." He became furious, and I began to fear he was dangerous. As soon as he paused, I resumed : "I did not come to make any inquiry about your guilt or innocence of this particular crime, but to ask you if you have not sins to repent of, and to be forgiven before you can be at peace with God, and be prepared to die and meet Him in judgment." He admitted this general truth, and I preached Jesus Christ the only and the sufficient Saviour. And in the midst of the appeal I said to him, looking into his eye with tenderness: "You have parents perhaps living, I hope pray ing for you now," and he answered : " I have respectable relatives" he did not say parents "living in this city, but they do not know that I am here ; and if I were to die to-morrow, they would not find me out." It was in vain that I urged him to seek reconciliation with those who ought to be his friends. And I had no reason to suppose that he had the slightest inclination to ward the Saviour, whom I offered with earnest words and prayers. It is quite probable that he was the unacknowledged son of a distinguished family, whose influence with the President of the United States procured his pardon. It is certain that he produced no new evidence of his innocence, but he was set at liberty. I never heard of him again. Perhaps, under another name, he resumed his rover-life, and found his death on the seas or on the scaffold. It is very true that, in this gloomy prison, by far the most who enter are from the degraded, ignorant and squalid classes. The slums feed the prisons and the poorhouses. But not all are the sons of the low and wretched. The hand somest boy in college with me, the son of a magistrate of wealth and influence, died in one of the cells in this same prison. A friend of mine, a professor of languages and a superior scholar, with associations as respectable as any, 354 IREN&US LETTERS. died in one of the cells of these living Tombs. There is not a week in the year when there not some often there are several who have fallen from the heights of good society to the depths of sin, shame, misery and the dungeon, from which the gate of deliverance is death. In a great city like this there are tragedies of domestic and social anguish con stantly in progress. Forty dead men lay one morning at the Morgue last week, waiting to be claimed by friends. No friends came. In most cases death was a comfort to survi vors, and oblivion a cover of sorrow and shame. All this is to say that the gospel ought to be always at work in this prison. The Son of Man came to seek and save the lost. Over the doors of Dante's Inferno was written: " Who enter here, leave hope behind." But while there is life there is hope. No other name but Jesus does these lost men good. And that name can, and does. While in this world we shall have constant war with sin and misery. Especially with sin, which is the parent of misery. There are many nostrums prescribed by quack doctors, who call themselves reformers, but they do no good. A drunkard may be saved whom God renews and holds in his right hand. When the Ethiopian can change his skin or the leopard his spots, then will he who has been accustomed to do evil learn to do well. It is Christ who alone is able to save unto the uttermost. What is the use of saying this over and over again : the same old story, Jesus and his blood : the sinner lost and the sinner saved? Well, it is just this: life is wearing along with each of us, and every day brings us so much nearer to its end. To save ourselves and others, to deliver men from the bondage of sin and misery, to get the lost out of the mire of vice and their feet on the Rock of Ages this is the great est of all the works that men or angels can do. A WOMAN'S VIEW OF CRIME, 355 A WOMAN'S VIEW OF CRIME. The quantity of nonsense precipitated by the agitation of questions of reform is something fearful. Happy they who are not compelled to read the many prescriptions of quacks and quidnuncs who discover new theories of vice and fresh remedies for crime, and inflict them on an anxious and cred ulous community. " The world is full of evil," said the poets hundreds of years ago, and thousands of years ago the pen of infinite wisdom and omniscient penetration wrote, " the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked." Yet there are not a few men and women, in these days of wonderful light and progress, who pretend to find the source of all vice in bad drainage or the state of the stomach. They would cure it like typhus or ague. This quackery has resulted in miserable sympathy for scoundrels as if they were the most unfortunate of the human race. If they become so sick as to commit burglaries or highway robberies they are pitied and petted, coddled and comforted : and if they become murderers they are adopted as children to be nursed by women and soft-hearted men, with jellies and panada. One of the most active of these foolish women has written and published an essay on prison reform, beginning with these words : " All crime can be traced to ignorance, intemperance or poverty." The statement is absurd and false. Yet a vast amount of writing and talking on prison and prisoners, crime and crim inals, is equally shallow and mischievous. The three sources of crime named are indeed prolific, but there are other and fearful sources, including an evil heart, whence proceed evil deeds, even murders, and into these sources or fountains of crime, there does not enter a drop of ignorance, intemper ance or poverty. Men and women of education, temperance and wealth commit crimes. Neither they, nor their fathers nor mothers were ignorant, intemperate or poor. Why 35 6 IRENMUS LETTERS. then does a writer on prison reform lay down a rule that is instantly disproved when crimes are traced to avarice, lust, revenge, ambition, jealousy and pure deviltry ? At the very moment when this wisdom was being written and published, there were in this city and Brooklyn hard by, a number of men under sentence of death for murder : the three causes of crime had nothing to do with any of them. Take Fuchs who, in a fit of jealousy, chopped his friend into pieces. Rubenstein, the Jew, was not ignorant, intemper ate or poor. Neither was his father. Yet he enticed his friend into a cornfield and murdered her deliberately. The Boston murderers, Pomeroy and Piper, were not tempted or driven to crime by any circumstances outside of their own wicked selves. To say, as this prison reform woman does, that ' all crime can be traced to ignorance, intemper ance and poverty," is in the teeth of that precept which reads : " When lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin ; and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death." That is the philosophy of the whole matter, and put into the quaint words of the old English Bible, sounds professional, but cannot be made more impressive or intelligible. A poor man takes his choice to work or to steal. He chooses to steal. The prison reformer says " the cause of this crime is poverty." Nonsense. Poverty stimulates thousands to hon est work. It is the cause of virtue far more than it is a cause of vice. A good man under the pressure of poverty, and the vast majority of the human family, depend upon daily labor for daily bread, and are hungry when they do not work. If poverty was the cause of crime, the world would be depopulated by the crimes of its inhabitants. Ignorance is not the cause of crime. Scarcely a sane man living, in the darkest land under heaven, is so ignorant as to commit crime in consequence of it, or from want of knowl edge that it is wrong to steal and commit murder. And if the entire population of the United States were taught the whole circle of sciences and arts, so that uneducated men were as rare as angels on earth, there would yet be crime. The Binghamton murderer, Ruloff, wag a prodigy of learn- A WOMAN'S VIEW OF CRIME. 357 ing. Dr. Webster was a Professor in our oldest University. Eugene Aram was a school teacher. And the ignoble army of official rascals, whose thefts in this city, in the canal rings of the State, in the Washington departments and the County Treasuries, are not poor, ignorant or intemperate. The whiskey villains now in prison, and the greater number out, were not drunkards on their own poison, crooked or straight. Intemperance deprives its victim of judgment and con science, inflames his passions, until he is "set on fire of hell." Hence more crimes are traced to this than to any other source. But this is itself a crime. To say that intem perance causes crime is merely saying, what is very true, that one crime causes more. Therefore it is the veriest quackery in reform to lay it down as a great principle that " All crime can be traced to ignorance, intemperance and poverty." It is simply nonsense. Another proposition equally absurd is laid down by the same writer in the same essay. She says : "Prisoners should be sentenced until reformed ': not for ten or twenty years with no regard to reform." This folly has its origin in the common blunder of these sapient reformers that the object of punishment is to reform men. That it is earnestly to be sought for, is very true, but law and penalty are not designed for the reformation of the convict. His reformation is a very desirable object, and all suitable means should be employed for that purpose. But law and penalty are for the protection of society, the preven tion of crime and the just punishment of criminals. If Win- slow is brought back to Boston and convicted of his numer ous forgeries and sent to prison, his reformation is no part of the object in view. God grant that the fellow may be reformed. But the object of the sentence is to punish for gery, restrain pthers from doing the same, and so make it safer for men to rely on the signatures of their neighbors. It was no part of the intent of the law to reform Dolan when it condemned him to the gallows. It was to make the pen alty a terror to evil-doers. Yet the moment that saw him 3S 8 IREN&US LETTERS. justly doomed, these reformers went about with petitions to get his neck out of the halter he so richly deserved. And now for the height of folly. The magnitude of the crime is not to be taken into account in imposing the pen alty ! Ten years or twenty years are not to be a measure of what is due to the law, but the prisoner is to be sentenced TILL HE REFORMS ! ! Pray tell us, Mrs. Reformer, who is to judge of the pris oner's reformation? Will you have a committee of the Prison Association to examine each convict and decide when he is reformed sufficiently to be let out upon society again ? Just imagine Judge Daly on the bench, pronouncing sen tence upon a thief or a murderer in these words : " Patrick O'Halligan, you have been tried and justly convicted of a great crime : under the old law you would have been sentenced to the gallows, or to prison for life, but under the reformed system introduced by the good women who now manage our criminal practice, it is my duty to sentence you to stand committed until you reform. I will appoint one of these excellent women to take charge of your reformation, and, under her direc tion, I have no doubt that a few days will see you turned out a reformed man, fully qualified to do your duty as a good citizen. Begging pardon for having detained you so long, I now wish you good afternoon." And this stuff is now the model talk of prison reform. It is all cant, folly, falsehood, sham, and deserves to be hissed out of philanthropic circles. Yet it is endorsed by religious people in this city. MINISTERS' SONS. 359 MINISTERS' SONS. My attention was recently turned to the fact that a few, and but a few, of the sons of the clergy, in the city, had be come ministers of the gospel. The means of making a pre cisely accurate statement of the facts are not in my possession, and the memory of others will doubtless retain the names of some that I have forgotten. Within the last thirty-five years I have known the sons of Potts, Bangs, Alexander, Skinner, Tyng, Hutton, Chambers, Newell, Knox, Vermilye, who have entered the ministry. But what are these, added to those not mentioned, compared with the multitude of fathers in the Church, whose sons have not entered into their labors, or the service of God in the same calling ? Then I wrote to Princeton and asked Dr. McGill to give me the number of students in the Theological Seminary there, whose fathers are or were ministers, and he wrote me : " As nearly as I can ascertain, we have 24 sons of ministers among the 1 20 on our roll at present, about one in five, a smaller proportion than usual here." A similar inquiry in the New York Union Theological Seminary, brought to me about the same report. To some it may appear that this is as large a number as might be rea sonably expected. The proportion of ministers to the whole population is so small, that a school of one hundred should not perhaps be expected to contain more than one-fifth of its members of the families of one profession. And it is not impossible that we would find it equally true of the legal and medical professions, that the sons do not generally follow the calling of their fathers. But it is also worthy of note that the work of the ministry has an element in it that does not touch the call to any other profession. While it is very true that the hand of God is to be acknowledged in every man's destiny, and He appoints to one man his place, and to another his ; still we, who believe in a divine and specific call as part of the evidence that a man should go into the ministry, do 360 I REN ;E US LETTERS. not ask for such an indication to decide that a young man shall go into trade or any other secular calling. Nor is it true that every man whom God calls obeys. As Jonah fled from his duty, so thousands now-a-days shirk theirs. God does not send a whale to swallow and save them, as he did in the case of Jonah; but we have known many cases in which they who have run away from the work to which they were called of God, have fallen into worse fates, and have bitterly repented their disobedience. If I were required to name two reasons for the few recruits the ministry gets from its own children, I would venture upon the facts that the sons of some are tempted by the chances of worldly success, and the sons of others are dis couraged by the trials they suffer with their fathers. The temptation is presented by the facilities which business offers to the well-educated sons of pastors. Every depart ment of prosperous trade in the hands of a parishioner is an opening for a promising young man who comes with the prestige of his own and his father's good name, so that a pastor is not under the necessity of seeking long and anx iously for a place into which to introduce his son, but places are always open and ready for him. The trials that discourage the minister's son from walking in the ways of his father, are common to the lot of the larger part of the families whose head is a preacher of the gospel. With the many, life is just a struggle to make the two ends of the year meet : old things must not be done away, but all things must be made as good as new, if possible : and to take no thought for the morrow when a flock of children are to be clothed and fed, requires an amount of grace greatly to be prized, if it can be had. Human nature is very imperfect, and it is not wonderful that a bright, observant and thought ful boy should, even with the approbation of his father, turn away from the service that seems so hard, when it ought to be more abundantly alleviated by those who enjoy it. It was never designed of Christ that his ministry should be a life of ease, profit and worldly recompense : but that is no apology for the meanness of those who keep their pastors on MINISTERS' SONS. 361 the shortest possible allowance. I have known the children of ministers to put out, like birds unfledged from the nest, and, before they were fit for it, to try to earn their own living, because they saw their parents unable to provide for them suitable food and clothing. I have had, as a guest in my own house, a rural pastor seeking his runaway soji, who had left home for no reason in the world but to cease being a tax upon his overtaxed parents. We may say, with truth, there is no calling that, on the whole, yields more peace and joy than the service of God in the pastoral work : but it is also true that its peace and joy come not from the reward that is seen, but altogether from the unseen and eternal. The boys cannot see it, and they seek another sort. It is said and proved and felt that there are too many min isters, but it is not shown that there are too many of the stamp the Church needs and desires to have. Perhaps there has been a back-set to the tide that once flowed in upon the ministry, and just now there may be a reluctance to go into the service. But there is not now, never was, never will be a time when a youth of fine promise should be turned away from this work by the glitter of any crown within the reach of a human arm. It is the prize of the highest calling. The rich and the noble of the earth may not be often called. But the mother who dedicates her son to the ministry and gives him to Christ, prays with and for him that he may be called, and sees him pressing through hardships and suffering into the pulpit as a minister of the gospel of the grace of God, seeks for him and gains for him, a crown that fadeth not, and will one day outshine the stars. That is a miserable lie which says that ministers' sons are the worst in the parish. One prodigal from the pastor's own fold makes more talk than ninety and nine apostates from the rest of the church. Because ministers' sons, as a rule, are good, the badness of some is a wonder and the town's talk. The promise is to the believing parent. After the fathers shall be the children. The sons of David shall sit on his throne. It is a kingly honor to be servant of the Most High. And blessed is that minister whose sons are kings. 362 IREN&US LETTERS. A MINISTER WHO WAS HUNG. William Dodd was an English clergyman, born in May, 1729, and educated at the University of Cambridge. He married a woman of extravagant tastes, and in this respect, as in many others, their tastes were alike. After being ordained he was made rector of the parish of West Ham, near London. There he proved to be so elo quent that he was soon called into the city and became one of its celebrities. With his popularity and prosperity he was more and more extravagant and reckless in his style of living. To meet his expenses he engaged in literary work outside of his clerical duties ; he was made tutor of young Philip Stanhope, afterwards Lord Chesterfield : and at length was appointed chaplain to the King. Chesterfield became his best friend : or worst : got him through many troubles, helped him to money, and to his ruin, of course: for, when he wanted more than his patron would give him, he committed a forgery upon Lord Chesterfield for $20,000, was tried, convicted and executed. Great efforts were made to save him. The jury recommended him to mercy. Noblemen, clergymen, and 23,000 citizens of London pe titioned the King to interfere, but the government declined to do so and the reverend criminal, under the law of the times, was hanged at Tyburn, June 27, 1777. Then, as now, commercial business, that exchange which requires the constant use of paper and signatures, was the life blood of social and national prosperity. To tamper with public confidence in the bonds of individuals or cor porations was to taint the blood of the community, poison the springs of wealth, derange the circulation, and damage irreparably the laws of healthful trade. A forger might have personal friends to intercede for him, but government and society looked upon him as a pirate, an outlaw, a thief of the meanest kind, justly meriting the heaviest punish ment the laws inflict. It was therefore held to be the duty of the King to interpose no obstacle, but to let the law take A MINISTER WHO WAS HUNG. 363 its course. The condemned clergyman became very penitent. His "Thoughts in Prison" and " Reflections on Death" are still extant and indicate the sentiments of an educated cler gyman in view of the scaffold. And so he died. Even more emphatically now, than a hundred years ago, the business of men is carried on by the means of paper, and the confidence felt in the genuineness of signatures and the honesty of transactions, is at the basis of daily and hourly intercourse. We give and receive promises to pay, we make our deposits in bank, we take certificates, bonds, mortgages, relying on the honesty of somebody, for not in one case out of a hundred, in the affairs of every-day life, is a man able to go back to the original parties, and know that it is all right. He takes it for granted, because of his confidence in human nature generally, and certain men in particular. And this confidence has become so large and business habits so loose in consequence of it, and greed has grown with the ease of getting, and money has cheapened by its adulteration, as rags take the place of precious metals, until it has now come to pass that crimes like that of Mr. Dodd and crimes in the same line with his, are of daily occurrence to the ruin of individuals and of that trust which society has a right to feel in its representative men. I do not say that all bankruptcies are criminal, though they are always failures to pay obligations honestly due. They are oftentimes the result of misfortunes, the crimes of others, and events that no human foresight could anticipate. But, so far as they come from imprudence, recklessness, greed, haste to be rich, improvidence, inattention, extravagance, speculation, or an over-sanguine temperament, they are criminal and merit punishment by law. All defalcations are crimes. All breaches of trust are crimes. All uses of other people's money without their consent, are crimes. Yet it is not unusual, in our times, to look upon a de faulter in a bank or counting room, as a generous fellow, who intended to put back the money he stole, so soon as he had made enough by gambling to warrant him in turning IREN^.US LETTERS. himself into an honest man. It does not occur to me at this moment that we have punished a defaulter in this city during the last quarter of a century. I have no doubt there have been more than five hundred detected in their crimes. There is a law of the United States requiring the publica tion annually of the names of defaulting officers, with the amounts they severally stole. Since 1865 the law has not been complied with. It is a good law, but it would be better still to put the defaulters invariably into the penitentiary. One year of righteous justice would save the country mil lions of money in the future. When treasurers or trustees are caught in their abuse of trust, they should be sternly held in the hand of justice. And there are men whose names have stood high in the church and whose false pretences have beggared thousands, yet these financiers are clothed in fine linen and fare sump tuously every day, while their victims are hungry and cold. These are serious matters, and big with future ills. It is not desirable to revive capital punishment for crimes against property. Let it be granted that the law condemn ing Dr. Dodd to death was wrong, and was wisely modified. But the crime, and all similar crimes, by which the money of others is taken from them by forgery, or defalcation, or breach of trust, or carelessness, or deception or fraud, ought to be punished as crime, not compromised, covered up, ex cused and so encouraged. Here is the weakness of the public conscience in this dawn of a new century of the Republic. This is the failing link in the social chain at the present day. Men look upon money crimes as venial sins. One hundred years ago, Tweed and Connolly and Sweeny, and all the men who took the people's money for work they never did, WOULD HAVE BEEN HUNG ; Harry Genet and Tom Fields would have graced the gallows (they never graced anything else). How is it now? It is impossible to discover a public feeling that DEMANDS the punishment of official thieves. A hundred years ago the men who let Tweed escape would have been hung, by law or without law. A MINISTER WHO WAS HUtfG. 365 To what is this tending ? Each advancing year increases the desire for wealth, diminishes the security of property, enhances the number, the pay and the opportunities of men holding judicial places, weakens public conscience respect ing stealing, blurs the eighth commandment in the deca logue, magnifies the influence of riches, rewards success in getting money without scruple as to the means, and puts honor on men who should be dressed in striped woolens, breaking stone instead of the laws, in the prisons of the country. Children in school and in the family should be taught "it is a sin to steal a pin, much more a greater thing." I do not wish to see the gallows made the punishment for stealing. But, I would be rejoiced to see a revival of common honesty. Things would then be called by their right names, and trea surers, clerks and trustees, directors and traders, bankers, and all who have the watch and care of other people's money, would understand that the meanest thief in this world, meaner than the sneak-thief who climbs into the window while we are at dinner and steals, meaner than the man who steals his neighbor's sheep in the night, is that professedly honest Christian who has the custody of another's money and puts it to his own use, or the man who abuses the con fidence of his fellow men by forgery or fraud. 366 IREN&US LETTERS. TORTURING THE LITTLE ONES. Two kinds of cruelty to children are so common, that to speak of one and not the other, would leave the subject half handled. You have children perhaps. If not, your neigh bors have. And this matter of caring for children is becom ing so much a matter of business, that we have a Society in this city to prevent them from being cruelly treated. It is an excellent Society. Good men, and all sorts of good men, favor it. None but bad men, and very bad men, would hinder its usefulness. And the two kinds of cruelty to children will be brought to your notice by the fact that there is a treatment of chil dren never complained of by the Society, that makes more misery to children and parents than beatings or hunger. I know a prominent member of the Society for the Pre vention of Cruelty to Children. He is the father of one little girl now about four years old. He doubtless loves her dearly. He thinks that loving her is shown by letting the child have her own way. She has it. She is never restrained, never governed, never crossed, always petted, indulged, and obeyed. The child rules the house. Father, mother, ser vants are all her slaves. What comes of it? Is the child happy because she lords it over the whole family ? So far from it, she cries with passion or pain a large part of the time. She is never contented. She goes from one thing to another in a constant series of searches for something to do that she ought not to do. And when she wants what it is impracticable to get, as the boy who cried for the moon, then she goes into tantrums and screams loud enough to split the ears of the neighbors. Thus the family are annoyed : the neighbors are annoyed : the child is wretched, peevish, fretful, impatient, passionate, dissatisfied with everything, and generally miserable. And she is very disagreeable. It was an ill-natured re mark of Jerrold to a mother who apologized for her child crying in the parlor: "O," said he, " I like to have children TORTURING THE LITTLE ONES. 367 Cry in company, for then they are taken right out of the room." And whenever I visit my friend, and his child sets up a roar, I think of Jerrold, and wish that his observation were in accord with my experience, which it is not. But it is a most mistaken idea that indulgence is kindness. Often it is the greatest cruelty. To impress upon a child the duty of obedience is the first of all lessons. It may be taught before the child is a year old ; and without a blow, or the infliction of any physical pain. It must be taught in very early life, or it will never be learned. To neglect it, and to put off government, until the child is old enough to be reasoned with, is cruel, wicked and silly. This neglect makes infancy and childhood a season of suffering, sows seeds of misery in after life, and perhaps of ruin here and hereafter. Dr. Adams said that parental government is the corner stone of civil government. And when I see the streets of a great city thronged at night with wrecks of young men and young women, whose steps already take hold on hell, I know that most of them are the victims of parental indulgence. They come from households where parents let them have their own way, when they should have been governed. Read the story of Eli and his sons, and tremble as you read. If we must have a Society for every thing, and we have a new one every year let it be an " Anti-letting-children- always-have-their-own-way Society." It will be a mercy to the children. Many will be saved from tears and groans and cries, by being " made to mind," and some will be kept from that place of torment where weeping and wailing have no end. Indulgence in wrong is the gravest cruelty to a child. I wish the new Society would go for its own mem bers who ruin their children as Eli did. He fell over and broke his neck when he heard that his boys were killed, for he knew that their sad end was his fault. So it will be your own fault, if your children perish through your neglect to govern them when they ace in tender years. That is one kind of cruelty. Now for the other. A few days ago, a teacher in a public school, to punish a 3^8 IREN&US LETTERS. child, lifted him by the ears, dropped him, lifted him again and again and dropped him, till the child was seriously, per haps fatally, injured. I have seen a lady lifting a child by the ears and carrying it out of a room to punish it for some trifling offence. We are shocked and disgusted by the recital of brutalities inflicted on children by their drunken parents or infuriated teachers ; but it is quite probable that the amount of cruelty by in judicious and respectable parents, under a mistaken sense of duty, far exceeds the crimes of the ignorant and intemperate. Many parents box the ears of children, striking them a square blow on the side of the head, a dangerous and wicked punishment. The sudden compression of the air within the ear is very apt to be inju rious, and the shock to the brain is perilous to the intellect. The injury may not be perceived at the time, but the founda tion of future and unspeakable suffering and sorrow may be laid by one inconsiderate blow on the temple of a child. More common than this, and equally cruel, is the practice of pulling the ears of children, the most common mode, with some parents, of punishing their own children. Teachers sometimes hold a child's ear while he is reading, and pinch or pull it at every blunder, thus hoping to keep the child's attention fixed for fear of the pain. A worse mode could not be adopted, for the child's mind is diverted to the dan ger and from the lesson, and so he stumbles. Such parents and teachers deserve corporal punishment themselves. The delicate organism of the human ear requires the most gentle handling, and to treat it as a mere cartilage to be pulled for the purpose of punishing, is a piece of inhumanity that reason forbids and religion condemns. Some parents send their children into a dark closet where they are in terror of imaginary goblins. Perhaps this is not as common as it was fifty years ago, but it is not out of use. It is not unfre- quently the cause of idiocy or insanity, and no judicious parent will permit it to be practiced in his house. Nurses often frighten children with tales of terror, threats of bears and big men, to carry them off. A nurse detected in such TORTURING THE LITTLE OttES. 369 crimes should be discharged before night. She cannot be cured. And she must not be endured. Cruel and unusual punishments are forbidden by human law. It is wonderful that parental instincts and human love are not strong enough to restrain the hand of fathers and mothers from hasty, passionate and intemperate violence on their own flesh and blood. A father vents his impatience on the son of his affections. A mother worn with care, wanting to read her novel or go to sleep, beats her babe to make it quiet. But a parent or teacher should never punish a child, in heat or with sudden violence. Such punishment has no moral force in it. The calm, judicial, righteous judgment is as needful in the infliction of pain upon an err ing child, as in the sentence of a prisoner at the bar. If you cannot govern yourself, you are quite unfit to govern chil dren, and if you strike a child in haste or under excitement, you deserve to be whipped yourself. Is the rod to be abolished, and would we condemn the punishment of children when they do wrong at home or in school ? So far from it, the wisdom of Solomon is wisdom yet. To deny the right and duty of punishing disobedient children, is logically to overturn the government of man and of God. And as obedience in society is in order to the highest happiness of the community, so in the family those children are the happiest who are taught and required to obey. Scolding will not make them obedient. Fretting makes them worse. Harshness, severity, cruel pains, loud words, and hasty blows are all wrong. But an even temper, inflexible purpose, unyielding to the entreaties of the child who wishes to do wrong ; these are virtues that dwell in every right mind, and will regulate the government of every well-ordered house. 37 IREN&US LETTERS. MILK AND WATER. Our good people, in this unhappy city, are afflicted with all sorts of impostors, swindlers, thieves, robbers, and even mur derers. Among them, perhaps, the sellers of impure milk are as bad as any. We think of milk as the natural food of our little ones, and when they imbibe a cup of the whole some fluid, we imagine it will do them good. So it would, if what is called milk were milk. It is an emblem of the best, even of heavenly food. The "sincere milk of the Word," we are told, should be "de sired," as if we were "new-born babes," that we " may grow thereby." But it must be "sincere" milk; that is pure, sine cera, without wax, as pure honey is sincere. If the Word has a mixture of error in it, the hearer will not " grow thereby:" it will do him no good, perhaps will be the death of him. So the milk we buy at our doors and use for our selves and families, must be sincere milk, pure, without adulteration, or it will not answer the purpose. And this is what we have had some lawsuits about lately. Our Board of Health has been putting its fingers into the milk cans with some good results. Having been provided with a milk-tester, called a lactometer, they have an easy method of finding out whether milk is mixed with water or not. It is a better test than a great institution used in this city thirty years ago. Premiums were offered for the best quality of milk, and the farmers and dairymen from all the country-side round about New York, came in with their milk pans, and set their milk for the judges to test and taste. The judges would not rely on their tasting faculties, preferring to employ them on liquids whose qualities they were more familiar with than milk. But they had a lactometer, an in strument marked with degrees like a thermometer, and this was to sink into the milk, more or less according to the rich ness, thickness, creaminess of the milk. That is, as milk yields cream, and cream is more solid than milk, these "wise men of Gotham," whose fathers ''went to sea in a bowl," MILK AND WATER. 371 supposed that the milk which had the most cream in it, is of course the richest and best. The lactometer would there fore sink only a little way int.o it, being buoyed up by the thickness of the liquid ; while in the lighter quality it would sink down freely to a deeper depth. On this principle the premiums were awarded. After it was all over, and the happy farmers and the disappointed ones had gone back to their cows and corn, it was discovered by some intermed dling philosopher that cream rises to the top because it is lighter than the rest of the milk, and of course that the milk with most cream in it is lighter than milk with less cream, and the premiums had been given to the poorest milk, and the best had been condemned as the worst! So much for the decision of judges who knew nothing of what they judge. Yet they were as wise as the New York lady who dismissed her milkman ^because, as she told him, "when the milk stood over night, a nasty yellow scum rose on the surface." But the tastes of city people have improved. The women generally know that the " nasty yellow scum," on the sur face of milk, is cream, and the cream is the very cream of the milk. The progress of ideas, the march of knowledge and the improvement in the modes of education, are illus trated by the following fact. A little girl in this city, received among her last Christmas toys, the present of a baby churn, holding about half a pint. Getting this quan tity of milk she churned away steadily until she " made the butter come," and at tea the wonderful pat was displayed and eaten in triumph by the admiring house. So you see that in the city we are learning to do our own work, and if we can not have good butter sent in, we will set the babes to make it, and we will keep our own cows too. Our Board of Health have been pursuing the milkmen with some small degree of vigor. Eight of them were arraigned under the law to prevent the adulteration of things sold. These milkmen are not those who drive about the streets in the morning, usually so early as to wake you up at an untimely hour, or so late as to make you wait half an 372 IREN^US LETTERS. hour after time for breakfast. Whenever did a milkman or a breadman come at the right time ? The breadmen are the more irregular of the two, and this reminds me of one in Philadelphia. He was, as usual, dashing madly through the streets when the celebrated Dr. Chapman was about to cross. The breadman saw the Doc tor, halted his horse suddenly and let him pass. The Doc tor bowed and said, " You are the best bred-man, in town." Milk-dealers keep the article in shops for sale to customers who call for it. They are supposed to have regular supplies from the country. Some of them do, But the milky way is a great mystery. It was proved upon a trial, not long since, that after the milk cans are put upon the rail cars up in the country, (how much water is put into the cans with the milk before, was not shown) the men on the cars help themselves to the milk at their pleasure, supplying the vacancy with water. On its arrival at the city, the cans are conveyed by wagon to the dealer, and on the way thither the driver takes out what he wants and fills up with water, which he carries in pails under the seat for the purpose, and finally the liquid reaches the shop of the retailer, who again waters it to suit his views of trade and duty to himself and customers. These last are the gentlemen, eight of whom were brought to trial on the charge of selling adulterated milk. One of them was arraigned and his was made a test case. The lactometer was the principal witness. Would it lie ? Could it be made to tell the truth ? Its capacity and its credibility were challenged. Experts were called in and put on the stand. Now these experts are becoming a very important and dan gerous set of men. Every man's life may be in the hands of experts. Is this your handwriting ? You say No, and up rises an expert and swears that he can tell to a dead certainty whether the handwriting is yours or not : he is an expert. Your testimony is of very little account, for though you may know, yet as you are not an expert and the other man is, you may find yourself in State prison for forgery because an expert, knows more than you do. And men do not always know their own signature. Some years ago an excellent MILK AND WATER. 373 Christian citizen was charged with forgery. The banker who accused him of forging his name, was handed in the court room, on the trial, a piece of paper with his own name on it, and he was asked if that was his signature. He said it was : examined it carefully and swore positively to it. Then three men rose up and made oath that one of their number, in the presence of the other two, wrote that signature on that table a few moments before, and did it to confound the banker. He acknowledged his error, was at once convinced that he had wrongfully accused his neighbor, withdrew the charge, paid the costs and sought to repair the injury he had done. But, if my memory be correct, the good man died from the effects of the injurious charge. But we neglect these milkmen. Experts proved that the lactometer was infallible as a test of the presence of water : the more water the deeper it would sink. It is made to stand at 100 degrees in ordinarily good milk : one Alderney cow's milk registered 112 and another 120. That was rich milk. Mr. Starr's cows, at Litchfield, gave milk so rich that, in pails 1 5 inches deep, the cream stood four inches thick. If the lactometer sinks below 100, it shows the presence of water. The milkman's milk on trial registered 80: he was convicted and fined $100; the others owned up and were let off on paying $50 each. So the lactometer and the experts were sustained, and the wicked milk-dealers came to grief. 374 IREN^EUS LETTERS. MY VINE: MY POOR VINE! The first house I ever owned was in Newark, N. J. With the house was a garden, and in the midst of the garden stood an arbor, and that arbor was covered by an Isabella grape vine, and of that vine is this story. As the vine was the crown of the garden, I employed an experienced vine dresser, at the proper time of the year, to prune it properly and put it in perfect order for the opening spring. A few days afterward, an amateur gardening friend, one who prided himself in knowing all about plants, from the cedars of Lebanon to Isabella grape vines, came to see me, and my new place. He was delighted ; but as he ap proached the central beauty, he remarked with great wis dom : " This is a very fine vine, but you ought to have had it trimmed !" This was discouraging indeed : but for the humor of the thing, I said, "You know so much more of this than I, per haps you would like to trim it ?" He sprang to the work, as if it were play, whipped out his jackknife, which he always carried to execute everything he could, and at it he went, cutting off all the wood he could find. Sure that my precious vine was spoiled, I hailed without further fear a visit from another friend and relative, who had great contempt for my knowledge of worldly affairs : we walked in the garden, and, entering the arbor, he said, ' You should have had this vine trimmed you never did know enough to " I checked him with, " You always save me the trouble, wouldn't you just go over it now; here's a knife." He took it fondly and, with the aid of a step-ladder, the old gentle man went through it, and left it as naked as Wolsey was when the king deserted him. Now my poor vine was certainly safe from further excision. But a week and an other visitor came to my vineyard. He was from the north ern part of New York, and did not realize the lateness of the MY VINE: MY POOR VINE! 375 season : it was April with us in New Jersey : he admired my new home, and when we came to the vine, so trim and clean and clear, I waited for his pleased expression; but, to my dismay, he exclaimed : "You have forgotten to have it trimmed: it's a splendid vine : it's late to be sure, but not too late to trim it yet." Having given up all hope of fruit from it, after its previous mutilations, I was quite careless about its fate and remarked : " Perhaps you would like to try your hand on it : here is an excellent knife." He seized it with evident pleasure, plunged in medias res instanter, and, in the course of thirty minutes, managed to amputate every bough of promise that had dared to make its appearance on the vine of my affections. The work of ruin was complete. The vine was barren that year. Next year perhaps a little better, but it never recovered the shock of those untimely wounds. My folly, in letting these quacks doctor my darling, was punished by its destruction. Often, when too late, I regretted that, for the sake of seeing to what length ignorance and self-conceit would go, I permitted these good friends to meddle with matters too high for them and, like the little foxes in the song of songs, to spoil my vine. Every man to his own business. Ne sutor ultra crepidam, Let the cobbler stick to his last. " Study to be quiet and to doyour own business" is a divine command, and, like all in structions from the same source, is full of common sense. The church and the world, religion and business, are dis turbed and annoyed and sadly injured, like my garden, with amateurs, pretenders, quacks: men who have new and im proved methods of doing what was well enough done before, but which they would do with patented processes peculiar to themselves, and a vast improvement upon everything that has gone before. My study is strewed with patent venti lators. Every autumn a new man appears with a queer shaped instrumentality, and, casting his eyes upwards at my windows, he says : " I see you've got one of them old-fashi ioned ventilators into there : it 'taint no good, is it ?" " No, it's good for nothing : better out than in." 37<5 IRENsEUS LETTERS. "Wall, now you see here's the thing to do it : I put one of these 'ere traps up to the top and tother into the bottom of the winder : and the wind comes whizzin in to one and goes out tother, and so keeps it fresh and kind o' breezy like all the time : 'spose you try "em." I consent, and he goes at it with a will. He pulls out the old ones : puts in his : and the next fall, perhaps the next month, another man comes along with a new patent venti lator and wants to try it. He tries it. It is very trying to me, but the pleasure of seeing the foolish experiments fail is the compensation. They are all equally bad. The same quackery succeeds in trade, in finance, in medi cine, in the Church. We live in cycles, circles ; what things have been shall be, and there is nothing new under the sun. Yet the world moves. Progress is made because good begets good and truth is fruitful. Conservatism holds fast that which is good, and with it works onward to the overthrow of evil. Radicalism is too impatient, rushes ahead, generally knocks its head against the wall, and would dash its brains out, if it had any. Even' the goose that laid golden eggs, one a day, was less of a goose than the radical who killed her to get all the eggs at once. One of the best books might be made by writing the biog raphy of defunct theories in science. Men have received as settled truths, vast systems of astronomy, chemistry and ge ology, that are now exploded. Yet while those sciences were the faiths of the day, it was quite as much as a man's repu tation was worth to teach otherwise. And to this day no man lives who knows what electricity is, or how the thing works. These facts ought to make men modest, self-dis trusting, and backward about coming forward, when they don't know what they are about. " Fools rush in where angels fear to tread," and many men are ready to try their hands at trimming other people's grape vines, when the regular vine dresser has already done his duty well. So in the Church. With the fullest, simplest and most WHITE AND YELLOW MEETING HOUSES. 377 beautiful instructions, the Church goes on from age to age, the comfort and salvation of all who will rest under the shadow of her wings. And every now and then some new light arises, with a patent right for explaining the rules, and a new way of saving souls. I would let a man trim my vine if he really wanted to, whether he knew anything about it or not ; but to work in the vineyard which the Lord has given me to keep, a man must be thoroughly furnished, and have the proofs of his skill, or he can't come in. THE WHITE AND THE YELLOW MEETING HOUSES. The Old White Meeting House, in Cambridge, N. Y., was the church of the regular line Presbyterians, of whom my father was the pastor. The Yellow Meeting House held the Scotch Presbyterians, of the sub-division known as Anti- Burghers, whose pastor was a noble son of Scotland, Alex ander Bullions, D.D. He and my father were the warmest of friends six days in the week, yes, and seven, but the Jews and Samaritans had more dealings together than did these two friends and their people on the first day of the week. This bothered me when a boy, and it has not become a whit more intelligible since. Dr. Bullions and my father were splendid classical scholars, and they would spend long winter evenings over Greek verbs and Latin prosody, disputing each other with imper turbable good nature, and making the low-roofed cottage ring with their uproarious laughter when one got the other fairly on the hip in a philological wrestle. They formed a club of four or five rural pundits, meeting once a week to read Latin and Greek and quarrel about it. Dr. Watts' dogs did not more delight to bark and bite, than these men did to get their teeth into one another on the pronunciation of a vowel or the inflection of a doubtful syllable. Dr. Mat. Stevenson was one of them : a physician and scholar. Also 378 IRENSEUS LETTERS. Scotch. Very much set in his way. They were discussing the difference in meaning of gens and natio. Dr. S. stood out boldly against all the rest ; till one of them bluntly said to him, " You are the most obstinate man I ever ^Vf see." " I am not obstinate," replied Dr. S. " I always give up as soon as I am convinced." How many just such pliable people I have met since ! Sometimes I think we all have a touch of the slme openness to conviction. But I was speaking of these ministers and their people. Into the mysteries of the diversities of the numerous Presbyterian bodies and souls, my studies in the refinements of ecclesiastical history were never carried so far as to enable me to mention them without reference to book. One of my associates in the office belonged to one of the minor sub-divisions of the Scotch churches, and whenever I have occasion to state the difference between Burgher and Anti-Burgher, Seceder, Associate, Reformed, Covenanters, Cameronians, etc., I ask him, he tells me, I write it, forget it, and ask him again the next time. But this I know, that no warmer friends ever lived than the pastors of those two Presbyterian churches, in the White and the Yellow meeting houses, albeit the views of the Scotch Doctor were such, or rather the rules of his kirk were such, that he and his people had no church fellowship with the pastor and people in the old White church. The Scotch minister was not half as set in the old way as his people. He was intensely Scotch in his brogue, so much so that it was hard for me to understand him when, at the school examinations, he would call out, " Wull, mawster Sawm, wot part o' verb is thot ?" But he was so full of genial good humor, so social in his nature, liberal, learned, large-hearted, loving, that he could not be kept in the strait jacket of any school but that of the one Master. His people quarrelled about the psalm singing : some claimed that only one line should be given out at a time, and others demand ing that two should be read and then sung. He pre vailed with the Presbytery to tell them it was of no impor- WHITE AND YELLOW MEETING HOUSES. 379 tance either way. But more serious was the trouble when he preached before the Bible Society immediately after one of the hymns of the late Isaac Watts had been sung ! For this he was accused, as of a crime, and brought before the judges. He asked " how long a time should elapse, after a hymn had been sung, before it would be fit for him to preach in the same house." I forget what was the result of this dis cussion. But one thing led to another and another, until this righteous old man was for a season laid under an inter dict, so that his lips were sealed that he might not preach the gospel he loved. He was afterwards released, and he died in the triumphs of faith. It was in the year 1746, about 130 years ago, that the Anti- Burghers, to whom Dr. Bullions belonged, had their quarrel with the Burghers, and the one body became two with these respective names. They split on a clause in the oath re quired to be taken by the freemen of certain boroughs, and the inhabitants being called burgesses, those who were willing to take the oath were called Burghers, and those who refused were called Anti-Burghers. The oath expressed "their hearty allowance of the true religion at present pro fessed within the realm, and authorized by the laws thereof." It was contended that the words " true religion at present professed" was an admission that the Established Church was the true religion, and therefore the one party would not take the oath. The contest was very fierce, and went into churches, hamlets, and houses. Friendships, old and warm, went out before the storm that swept over the country. Many interesting stories of the times are handed down. Johnny Morten, a keen Burgher, and Andrew Gebbie, a decided Anti-Burgher, both lived in the same house, but at opposite ends, and it was the bargain that each should keep his own side of the house well thatched. When the dispute about the principles of their kirks, and especially the offen sive clause in the oath, grew hot, the two neighbors ceased to speak to each other. But one day they happened to be on the roof at the same time, each repairing the thatch in the slope of the roof on his own side, and when they had worked 380 IREN&US LETTERS. up to the top, there they were face to face. They couldn't flee, so at last Andrew took off his cap and, scratching his head, said, "Johnnie, you and me, I think, hae been very foolish to dispute, as we hae done, concerning Christ's will about our kirks, until we hae clean forgot His will about ourselves ; and we hae fought sae bitterly for what we ca' the truth, that it has ended in spite. Whatever's wrang, it's per fectly certain that it never can be right to be uncivil, unneighborly, unkind, in fac, tae hate ane anither. Na, na, that's the deevil's wark, and no God's. Noo, it strikes me that maybe it's wi' the kirk as wi' this house ; ye're working on ae side and me on the t'ither, but if we only do our wark weel, we will meet at the tap at last. Gie's your han', auld neighbor!" And so they shook han', and were the best o* freens ever after. It did not remain for Dr. Bullions and my father to " meet at the top" before they were one in heart, soul and mind. They loved at first sight, and so much the more so as they saw the day approaching when they would sit down in the same General Assembly and Church of the first-born, whose names are written in heaven. Yet I have often thought of the solid comfort those two pastors now take in the Church on high, where the wicked, and the ignorant and bigoted and unreasonable, cease from troubling, and the weary sons of thunder are at rest. They sing together the song of Moses and the Lamb, and whether David wrote it, or Watts made a version of it, or Rouse metred it, or Sternhold and Hop kins, or Tate and Brady, or whether they read two lines and sing, or only one, I know not, or what " the players on instru ments who shall be there" will have to play on, is all unre- vealed unless the harps and the trumpets are to be for the use of the saints ; but of this I am sure, that they two those glorious old pastors of the White and the Yellow churches, now enjoy " The song of them that triumph, The shout of them that feast, And they who with their Leader THE MEANEST WOMAN IN NEW YORK. 381 Have conquered in the fight, Forever, and forever Are clad in robes of white. O holy placid harp notes Of that eternal hymn !" Can you tell me what is the use of waiting till we meet at the top before we, who are to be one up there, shall be one ? Let us try it on among those who are of one name, who not only have the same Bible, but have the same creeds and catechisms. Surely there is no good reason why these Presbyterians of many subordinate names, yet all one in the belief of the truth, should not be so related or confederated as to be in substance one, having members indeed, but really and truly one for the edifying of the body of Christ. Some thirty or forty of these limbs are now scattered over the world, waiting for the manifestation of some power to draw them to their several places, so that all, being fitly compacted together, may form a stately temple to the glory of its Head and King. There is no reason for their present dismember ment that will have any force or value in the air of heaven. The White and the Yellow meeting houses will be of the same color in the shine of the Lamb who is the light of the upper sky. THE MEANEST WOMAN IN NEW YORK. She lives in a fashionable quarter of the town. And this is what she did and does. In the name of charity she gave out some dress-making to the inmates of one of the institu tions for reforming and saving women supposed to be lost. When the work was done, and well done, the fashionable and charitable lady was not ready to pay the bill, which amounted to the enormous sum of $12. The same work, if it had been done at a fashionable dress-maker's, would have cost her $25, perhaps $50. She had no complaint to make 382 IREN^EUS LETTERS. of the manner in which the work was done ; but she haggled about the price, and, as she gave out the work in charity, she thought, probably, that the charity should be extended to her and not to the poor sewing woman who had earned the money. One month passed away, and another, and six more, while this wealthy and charitable woman, with one excuse and another, put off paying the poor girl who was seeking to earn an honest living and turn from her evil ways. But she could not get her hard-earned money from this lady patroness. Finally, in despair, she had recourse to the law, by the aid of an agency, and the prospect of exposure, in the character of a fraud, brought the lady to terms and she paid the full amount ! And I have styled her the meanest woman in New York. If any one knows of meaner men or women than they are who defraud in the name of charity, who do wickedness under the pretence of benevolence, let them mention the facts and I will modify the opinion. Further : women, as a general. thing, are so much better than men, more sympa thetic, charitable and liberal, that a business like this is meaner in a woman than it would be in those hard old tyrants called men. When a pious woman of fashion, a leader perhaps in the benevolent operations of the church, first directress of this society, and manageress of that, and treasurer of another ; who thinks nothing of paying $500 for a dress for one evening's wear, and, to be very charitable, employs a poor fallen woman struggling with poverty and honesty, and then neglects to pay her wages, she deserves to be labelled as among the meanest of her sex. Her standing in the church and society only increases her meanness, and draws upon her the aggravated contempt of all rightminded ladies. There is in our city a society, with whose works I have been conversant for ten or a dozen years past, whose records are dark with stories of such wrongs as this. It is a society so humble in its sphere and so righteous in its purposes ; so still and yet so strong, founded in the two great virtues that illustrate the divine character, and therefore that of the best THE MEANEST WOMAN IN 'NEW YORK. 383 of human character, the virtues of justice and mercy, that it commends itself to the hearty sympathy and support of the wise and good. Its object is to " Protect Working Women" in their rights to what they earn : finding employ ment for them, and seeing that their wages are paid accord ing to agreement. This " Protective Union" has its office at No. 38 Bleecker street, just out of Broadway. If you will bear with me, I will tell you a little more of the good it does by revealing, punishing and preventing the oppression of the poor by the rich and mean. Honest pay for honest work is its motto. It tells us that the petty frauds imposed on igno rant, helpless, industrious working women, are innumerable. To expose such frauds and save the suffering from greater suffering, the society hears their complaints, uses the gentle argument of reason and compassion, and when these fail, then the society puts forth the arm of the law, takes by the throat the fashionable lady who defrauds the poor of her wages, and says, in that persuasive language which law only uses, " Pay her what thou owest." It is beautiful to observe how quickly a mean rich women listens to the dulcet voice of a legal summons. " Really, I declare now, do excuse me, but I had forgotten all about it : O yes, that little bill ; yes, yes : let me see, ten dollars, was it ? Certainly." " And the costs, madam." " Costs ? costs ? what costs ?" says the lady, " I thought it cost $10." " Yes, but the costs of the proceedings : the writ, the ser vice, the fees, you see : $5.65 : and the interest on the bill, what's been a running a year now and a little more : it amounts to $16.40." " Well, I will send it around in the course of a day or two." " You had better pay it now and save further costs : an execution will ' " Execution ! you don't mean anybody's going to be hung?" "No, no: an execution is a writ to be served on your goods and chattels, to sell 'em, and get the money to satisfy this 'ere little bill : guess you'd better pay it now." 384 IRENES US LETTERS. And so the lady squirms a while longer and finally pays the bill : the poor sewing woman gets her pay in full ; the society gets its costs ; and the lady gets a lesson. If she tells of it, so much the better, for the lesson is useful to all who are in the habit of defrauding the hireling of his wages or keeping back that which is due to such as have none to help them. In one year, the last year, the society collected unpaid lawful wages for poor women, amounting to $2,544.31, in average sums of about $3.50. It has also, in the last seven years, lent to poor women in small sums to the amount of $2,145.45, and has been repaid by them every cent except about $25 still due ! It has recovered for these women their wages due and refused, $16,411.29, and this is but a fraction of what it has secured for its helpless people in making em ployers faithful to their agreements, for fear of being put through a course of legal suasion. The most common and severest form of swindling poor women, is that pursued by the agents of inferior sewing machines : the old and honorable companies never resort to such measures : but a set of sharpers may trade even in the best machines, hiring them out to women who are to pay $5.00 a month for the use of them, and to own the machine when its price, a very high price, has been paid in these instalments. In case of default for a single month, the agent seizes the machine, declares the payments forfeited, carries it off, and the poor woman is helpless. The society has largely broken up this iniquity, and the best companies now make such liberal arrangements with their machines, that swindlers stand a poor chance of making anything by their operations. The society sends its officers to reason with employers, in behalf ol complaining women, and seeks out the truth, which is not always on the side of the complaint. It often succeeds without using pressure. But when soft words fail, it uses force. Mary Thompson was employed to make a bridal dress, and when the wedding day came, $30 were still due to Mary for her hard work : but she couldn't get it. The bride was married in the dress for the making of which the poor THE GOOD DR. MUHLENBERG. 3^5 sewing woman was not paid ; and the happy husband was not so happy when the bill was soon afterwards presented to him, with $14.50 costs added to it. His bride was dearer to him than he had ever thought. It is pleasant also to hear that a lawyer of our city had a taste of the excellence of his own profession, by being sued for the wages of a gov erness. Being himself a lawyer he managed to stave off the payment of $17.75 until the costs carried up the bill to $32.25, and then he had to pay it all. Verdict, served him right. In many ways besides these, this wise and kind society wields its power for good to those who want it most. It greatly needs pecuniary aid to make it more useful. And they who give even a cup of cold water to those who are laboring in such a blessed work, shall in no wise fail of their reward. THE GOOD DR. MUHLENBERG. " I would not live ahvay." A life-like portrait of the blessed old man, in the volume by Sister Anne Ayres, brings him back as to me he looked, one winter morning, when he came down early and climbed into my fifth-story office. He was quite out of breath when he reached the height, and I waited with some anxiety to know why, for the first time, he had wound his way up the cork screw stairway. Presently he spoke, with a soft, sweet voice, his face beaming with human love and heavenly grace a saint in every line : "Good Friday is at hand, and as I was putting on my clothes this morning I said to myself, ' What a happy thing it would be if all the churches, of every Christian name, would observe it as a day of fasting and prayer ; I will go down to my friend at the Observer office and see if he will favor the idea, and I will take his response as an indication of Provi dence as to the expediency of making the suggestion public.'" 386 IRENsEUS LETTERS. When I assured him of my cordial concurrence in the" thought and our willingness to second it publicly, and to strive earnestly to make the proposal universally acceptable^ the good man wept for joy, gave audible thanks to God, and I thought he would embrace me, so great was his surprise and delight. " Yes," he added, " I confess it. I was afraid you would not help me." From that time onward he was free to speak with me in regard to the good works to which his life was devoted, and I learned to love and revere him more ind more while he lived. He is (not was, for such as he live long after they are buried) a living illustration of the fact that a man may be in the world and not of it; above it while he is in it.: a godly man of action and business as well as of prayer and faith. In him was no guile. He would suffer wrong sooner than do wrong. He was not original ; he had a pattern, and that pat tern was Christ. The volume gives his early life, and shows the steps by which he walked from the Lutheran Church, in which he was bap tized, to the Episcopal, where he was confirmed ; after the minister, Mr. Kemper, assured him that " regeneration does not mean a change of heart." Then he resolved to give up going to the theatre, of which he was rather fond, considering it one of " the pomps and vanities of the world ' that he had vowed to renounce. Of his ministry in this city, his wonderful devotedness to the sick and suffering, his fatherhood of St. Luke's Hospital, and of the homes at St. Johnland on Long Island, the book before me is a graphic, life-like story, every page the record of some good deed done, the whole a record that angels might read with wonder, love and praise. Dr. Muhlenberg was not one of your softly, untempered, half-baked men, afrs.id to speak out and say what he felt. He went one day to the office of a rich friend to ask him, as landlord, to release a poor woman from her rent, which was due. Failing, he begged for a small donation for the widow, THE GOOD DR. MUHLENBERG. 3&7 which was also refused. Then he berated his friend in good set terms, adding : " I would rather take my chance for hea ven with the meanest beggar in New York than with you." It gratifies one's depravity to know that the very best men do and say things that we are chided for, when human nature asserts itself in honest rebuke of wrong. When the elegant church of St. Thomas was going up, south of St. Luke's Hospital, Dr. Muhlenberg sought to have the bells dispensed with, for fear they would disturb the patients in their sufferings. But he failed, and the bells went up, and made their chimes, to the good man's great annoyance. Some years afterwards the Fifth avenue Presbyterian church began to rise on the north side of the Hospital, and nearer to it than St. Thomas. Again the Dr. was full of fears for his suffering patients, and he went to Dr. John Hall, the pastor, to pour out his feelings. He began very gently by congratulat ing him on the progress of the new building, and then remarked, as if incidentally : " And I suppose you will be soon having a bell in the new tower." " No," said Dr. Hall, " we feared it might disturb the patients in your Hospital, and we have concluded not to have a bell." The good old man was completely taken aback, and exclaimed : " Oh, you are more considerate than my own people." I would not make a private party, however pleasant, dis tinguished and memorable, the subject of public remark, but finding a reference to it here, I may. It was one of those episodes in life that old men enjoy with a flavor which youth does not know. For old age has its pleasures, as Cicero and other wise and great men have found. Of this venerable company I was made one, on account of my youth, as the kind and clever note of invitation from the accomplished host himself a host very neatly intimated. Mr. Charles H. Russell sat by the side of Dr. Adams. Dr. Muhlenberg, Mr. W. C. Bryant, Mr. James Brown, Mr. Peter Cooper, Dr. Cal- houn, of goodly Lebanon, and one more, composed the com pany. 388 IREN&US LETTERS. Dr. Adams requested Dr. Muhlenberg to ask the blessing. The patriarch complied in these rhythmical words : " Solemn thanks be our grace, for the years that are past, With their blessings untold, and though this be our last, Yet, joyful our trust that through Christ 'twill be given, All here meet again, at his table in heaven." It was very natural that we should pass from this brief poem and prayer to others by the same author, and I asked Dr. Muhlenberg for the correct reading of a line in his cele brated hymn, " I would not live alway." It is sometimes printed "the few lund mornings," and again, " the few lurid mornings." " Which of these, Dr., is the true reading?" " Either or neither," he replied with some spirit. " I do not believe in the hymn : it does not express the better feel ings of the saint, and I would not write it now." This was a surprise to me, but I was glad to hear him say so. Mr. Bryant took a very cheerful view of old age, and dis claimed any feelings of depression or infirmity with the advance of life. When some pleasantry enlivened the table, Mr. Brown, who sat next to me, and was somewhat hard of hearing, looked up deploringly, and said : " You don't know how much I lose by being deaf." "Aye, Mr. Brown," I replied, "and you don't know how much you gain !" Of those six guests, four have put on immortality. Dr. Calhoun died a few months afterwards. Mr. James Brown followed, hand longo intervallo. Then Dr. Muhlenberg slept with his beloved in St. Johnland. Mr. Bryant had his wish fulfilled in being buried in June among his own flowers in Roslyn. Mr. Peter Cooper I met at the De Lesseps dinner the other night, and his seat was next to mine. It must be wisdom, not age, that puts me with these venerable men. He said to INTERCOURSE WITH DR. ADAMS. 389 me : " I am ninety years old, and do not feel the effects of age." Wonderful old man : useful and honored to the last : un doubtedly the " first citizen" now. Dr. Muhlenberg loved Dr. Adams tenderly, which is not re markable ; but I find in this volume an observation by Dr. A. that is characteristic of both him and his friend. Dr. Adams says: " More than once I have said to my family, when returning from some interview with him, in which he had honored me with a kiss, that I felt as if the Apostle John had embraced me and repeated in my ear some words which had been whispered to him by the Master on whose bosom he had leaned at the supper." When Dr. Muhlenberg rested from his labors, and was not, for God took him, we fondly trusted that some one, in his spirit and power, would take up the work he left. Others do perpetuate the useful charities he founded. But where is the living presence of the model saint and pastor and friend? Who among us now sanctifies the city by a life of supernal beauty in its mephitic atmosphere ? Dr. Muhlenberg left a hoarded heap of gold behind him ! Two gold pieces $40, in all this was his savings to pay for his burial ! All that he had, all that he received, all that he was, he gave to Christ and his friends while living, and died leaving not enough to pay the expenses of his funeral. INTERCOURSE WITH DR. ADAMS. Now that the first gush of public sorrow has subsided, and others have said what was in their hearts of our departed friend and elder brother the late Rev. Dr. Wm. Adams it may not be presuming if another hand should bring a hum ble tribute for his tomb. When he contemplated the resignation of his pastoral charge on Madison Square, to accept the Presidency of the 1REN&US LETTERS. Theological Seminary, he was doubtful as to the line of his duty, and sent for friends to counsel on the great and difficult question. It was not for me to advise such a man ; but when he would have an opinion, I could only say : " It is quite probable that you are called of God to be the President of the Seminary, but it is not necessary that you retire from the Madison Square pulpit. A colleague or assistant may supply your lack of service, when you assume other labors : but such a life as yours will be rounded and complete when you die in the highest office on earth a Christian PASTOR." He resigned from a sense of duty to the people, when he decided to take the Chair, and it is to be presumed he did not regret the decision. With the Apostle he could always say, " This one thing I do ;" and he often spoke, in private, to me in terms of high commendation of those men who spend their strength and time in the work to which they are called, declining to divert their minds or employ their powers in extra labors, however useful and important they might be. He was invited to take part in the Centennial Celebration of the Battle of Lexington, where the first blow of the Ameri can Revolution was struck, and the shot was fired that was heard around the world. He invited me to go with him, to be the guest of his brother-in-law, Mr. Magoon, in Medford, near to Lexington. It so happened that I had at that time the pistol from which that shot was fired : the pistol that Major Pitcairn discharged when he gave the first order to British soldiers to fire on the Americans. Armed with this pistol and its twin, I joined Dr. Adams and went to the bat tle-field. But there was no fighting now. Those three days of social life with him and his friends were ideal days. He loved to take me to houses and hills and churches in that region where his youth and his young ministry were spent : where he first loved and was married : he lived over the scenes of early manhood, when life was all before him and hopes of usefulness were high. He was young again. With his children and theirs around him, and a thousand sweet associations, every moment his loving nature awoke as in the morning of spring, and he was fresh, buoyant and cheerful, as INTERCOURSE WITH DR. ADAMS. 391 if he were on the verge of thirty and not of three score and ten. We were very desirous to have him go to Edinburgh to the General Council in 1877, and it was with the greatest reluct ance that he yielded to the pressing solicitations of his breth ren. He did not like to go away from home. And when he reached London he was thoroughly homesick. He came from the hotel where he was in the midst of friends, and sought for rooms in the private lodgings I was enjoying. Here he met my daughters, and when he gave them each a paternal kiss, he said, " There, that's the first thing like home I have had since I came away." He said he longed to go back, and his eyes were full of tears as he spoke. It was wonderful to see a stately, dignified, elegant old man, full of honors and friends, whom every one was proud to welcome and entertain, so child-like and simple, so full of affection for those he had left behind, that his only care now was to get back again as soon as he could. In Edinburgh it was my lot to be attacked with illness at the house of my kind friend, Dr. Blaikie. The anxiety of Dr. Adams, his sympathy, his tenderness, his attentions, were those of an elder brother or parent. He has told me since that his fears were great that I would not recover. This apprehension was the result of his own great depression of spirits, for it was not shared by any one else. But it brought out the exceeding love of his heart, his overflowing sympathy, and'it endeared him to me more tenderly than ever. How proud of him we all were at that great Council of men from all lands ! If there was one in that assembly of divines, of loftier and nobler mien than Dr. Adams, I did not see him. Some days after the Council dissolved, I was travelling from London to Folkestone, on my way to Paris. Into the same compartment of the rail-car came an English gentle man, whose servant in livery stowed away his travel- impedi ments and retired. The stranger, a fine-looking man, of courtly manners and address, very soon began to converse with me in the manner said to be peculiar to my countrymen. LETTERS. He put questions to me. Having ascertained that I was an American traveller, and from New York, he said to me : " Are you acquainted with the Rev. Dr. Adams ?" When he learned that Dr. A. was a valued friend of mine, he went on to say : " What a splendid specimen of the Christian gentleman he is. I had the pleasure of meeting him in London but a few days ago, and to present him to Mr. Gladstone, who was charmed with him, and expressed to me privately his admira tion of the American scholar and divine." I did not learn my travelling companion's name, until I related the incident to Dr. Adams, who recalled him at once. When the appeal came to Christians in America to send a deputation to the Emperor of Russia to ask liberty of wor ship for dissenters in the Baltic provinces of his empire, we held a meeting of the Evangelical Alliance, and it was easily resolved that such a deputation was to be desired, but as the men must go at their own charges, over the ocean and the continent, where were the men to be found? In the silence that ensued, Dr. Adams came across the room and whispered in my ear, " I will go." I presume it was the only time he ever nominated himself. But the service was not one to be sought, and volunteers were not to be found. He was appointed at once : others followed : the deputation was filled : it went on its mission, and God gave it great success. His benevolence was only equalled by his facility for lead ing others to be generous. They relied so justly on his judg ment that they gave with confidence and pleasure when he endorsed the object. And the amounts of money given by his friends to charitable objects at his indication, can never now be added up ; but, if they could, the sum would be enor mous and astonishing. A foreign missionary lost the sum of $3,000, and Dr. Adams said to me : " Let us make it up to him for the benefit of his children. You raise one thousand, and I will raise two." He easily got his before I got mine, but it was all obtained, and is now bearing fruit. I am very sorry that I cannot lay my hand on his playful note, in February, 1876, asking me to come and dine with INTERCOURSE WITH DR. ADAMS. 393 some young friends and help to keep them in order. Among the guests at that memorable dinner, there was no one, ex cept Dr. Calhoun, missionary from Mount Lebanon, and my self, less than four score years of age. Four of them pre ceded Dr. Adams to the Eternal state. With what graceful dignity, charming simplicity and ease, he sat at the head of his hospitable table on that occasion : drawing each one out according to his measure and manner, and filling up every pause with his own ready anecdote and reminiscence. Only last May I received from Dr. Adams a letter answer ing some inquiries in which he writes of Dr. Muhlenberg and the dinner to which reference is made above. He says : " I was expecting a visit at that time from a relative in Connecticut, more than ninety years of age, who, at this very time, is more elastic than I am. " It so happened that a few days before I had received a very pleasant let ter from the late Richard H. Dana, then past 90, containing a very pleasant message for Bryant, so that I played the part of hyphen between the two great poets. " I have been reading this evening the life of Dr. Muhlenberg, and have been melted into tenderness by many of its incidents. He was a veritable saint, with nothing of asceticism about him, he knew the greatness and the blessedness of self -subjection for the good of others. He was truly catholic in spirit, while cordially attached to his own church. His taste was grati fied by its forms of worship and by the right observance of its Calendar. He left his ' ideal of representative communion* as a legacy with me and , to be carried into execution, and I am reproached when looking upon his sweet and beautiful face, because I have been forgetful of the trust ! More of this hereafter. ' ' I hope I shall be made better by my renewed intercourse with Dr. Muh lenberg in the pages of this work. " Cordially yours, " W. ADAMS." After Dr. Adams had retired from the pulpit, and his suc cessor was settled, I made a sketch, beginning with this illus tration : " If you would know what space you fill in the world, thread a cambric needle, drop the needle into the sea, draw it out again, and seethe hole that is left. That's you." The next week after the notice was in print, he met me with his bright and loving smile and said : " I get letters 394 IREN&US LETTERS. telling me ' I am only a cambric needle in the water, after all.' " Ah me! The simile now seems worse than a mockery. The City, the Seminary, the Church at large, and Dr. Adams not there. The vacancy is great. It will be years many before it is filled. Israel has chariots and horsemen, but where is the man like him who stood at the head of the host ? THE LATE DR. S. H. COX. One of the most brilliant intellects of the American pul pit passed into another sky when Dr. Cox was glorified. More learned men, with more logical, and far more nicely bal anced minds, more useful ministers and leaders, have lived in his day. But we have had no one with his blazing genius, bold and dazzling eloquence, range of imagination, fertility of illustration, astonishing memory, exuberant wit, rapid as sociation of ideas, stores of facts and words from classic authors, and the faculty of expression that combined the sturdy, grotesque eccentricities of Carlyle with the flow and beauty of Macaulay. A meteor streams across the sky, and for a brief moment we rejoice in its light; its beauty and brilliancy disappear, and the stars shine on steadily in their orbits. It is sad to know that so little of what Dr. Cox said remains on the printed page or in the memories of those who survive him. He did not write as he spoke. He would have failed as an author. No reporting did justice to his rhetoric, which, transcending all rules, was a law unto itself, blinding the eyes and ravishing the ears of his hearers. When he was told that Caleb Cotton had said, "Were it not for his Coxisms, Dr. Cox would be a great man," Dr. Cox answered, "Yes, he might have been Caleb Cotton." He did have his Coxisms. They were marked peculiarities of verbal utterances, by which he was distinguished from all MEMORIES OF DR. SAMUEL HANSON COX. 395 the preachers of his time. Having a slight impediment in his speech, which made him hesitate on certain letters, he selected instinctively words with such initials as he could utter readily, and this brought to his lips words and phrases that startled by their novelty, size, and immense fitness to convey the idea ; words that no mortal man but Dr. Cox or Thomas Carlyle would have invented for the place. The Latin and Greek languages were so familiar that he garnished his discourse with their words, to the astonish ment of the people and the bewilderment of the unlearned. A British peasant said to his new pastor ; " You don't give us any Latin, as our old minister did." ' No, I do not, for I did not suppose you understood Latin." "We don't, sir; but we pays for the oest, and we've a right to the best." Dr. Cox's people could make no complaint of him on that score. Who ever heard him make a platform speech with out the E Pluribus Unum ? I was by his side on the platform when he was Moderator of the New School Presbyterian General Assembly in Phil adelphia. He was offering the prayer in the morning, and in the midst of it he said : "O Lord Jesus Christ, thou art the ne plus ultra of our desire, the sine qua non of our faith, and the ultima thule of our hope." Yet so natural to him was this form of expression, that he had no recollection of it afterwards. His friend, Dr. E. F. Hatfield, was by his side also, and remembers the remark able words. It was in this same Assembly that a member from Ohio cast reflections, in debate, on Decorated Divines, when Dr. Cox called him to order, remarking, with gentle humor : " The brother should not speak disrespectfully of Doctors of Divinity ; he does not know what he may come to himself." When Williams College made Mr. Cox Dr. Cox, he decli ned the Degree in a characteristic letter to The New York Observer, ridiculing the title and condemning the dis tinction. My predecessor, Sidney E. Morse, published the LETTERS. letter, of two solid columns. That is the letter in which occurs the phrase " semi-lunar fardels," meaning D.D., the resemblance of the letter D to a half moon suggesting this play. But by-and-by Dr. Cox thought better of it, and was then heartily sorry that he ever wrote the foolish letter. But, what is even more remarkable, he blamed Mr. Morse for printing the letter, saying that he (Mr. M.) ought "to have had sense enough to decline its publication." Mr. Morse often laughed with me over the eccentricity of Dr, Cox's mind in that matter. His memory held whole pages and volumes of poetry and prose, which he could recite with elegance and correctness, astonishing and delighting the favored hearer. Cowper's Task, Scott's Marmion, and Milton were favorites. His memory of dates and names appeared conspicuously in his lectures on Biblical Chronology, and the way in which he handled " Tiglath Pilezer" and his contemporaries would put the modern lecturer to confusion if he were to attempt an imitation. I asked him to come over from Brooklyn to lecture in a course I was conducting, but he refused point blank, because when he had gone on a former occasion the people did not attend ! I assured him there would be no lack of hearers, and he finally yielded to my gentle blandish ments. We walked together to the church where he was to speak, going early to put up some maps for illustration. Though it was half an hour before the time to begin, we met thousands coming away, and the vestry and aisles were so packed that we could scarcely get in. As we were strug gling up, he said to me, " This lecture has been \\-&\\ primed." To which I, " And it will go off well too." And it did. He discoursed on BABYLON. Thirty-five years have passed since that night, but the grandeur of the scene, those hanging gar dens, the palaces, streets and battlements of Babylon the Great rise now in lustrous glory on the memory. How much I do regret that my dear friend, Dr. Adams, whose grave is not yet grass-grown, did not comply with my request to write out the introduction, which he often related in company, to the speech of Dr. Cox in Exeter MEMORIES OF DR. SAMUEL HANSON COX. 397 Hall when he there represented the American Bible Soci ety, before the British and Foreign. Dr. Adams knew it word for word, and that it is in print I do not know. Dr. Cox arrived in London and in Exeter Hall after the meeting was begun, and a tirade against America greeted him as he entered. As the speaker sat down, Dr. Cox was announced as the delegate from the American Society. The terrible denunciation just delivered had excited the in dignation of the audience, and Dr. Cox was received with respectful coldness. But his splendid figure, his gallant, courteous, commanding presence, his irresistible smile, lightened instantly the gloom of the hall, and conciliated the audience. He said something like this : " My Lord, twenty days ago I was taken by the tug Her cules from the quay in New York to the good ship Samson, lying in the stream thus, my lord, going from strength to strength from mythology to Scripture by the good hand of the Lord I was brought to your shores just in time to reach this house, and to enter in the midst of the burning denuncia tions of my beloved country that have fallen from the lips of the gentleman who just sat down. He has reproached that country for the existence of slavery, which I abhor as much as he. But he did not tell you, my lord, that when we re volted from your government, one of the reasons alleged was the fact that your king had forced that odious institu tion upon us in spite of our remonstrances, and that the original sin rests with you and your fathers." [Having adduced the well-known facts of history to prove this position, he continued] : " And now, my lord, instead of indulging in mutual reproaches, I propose that the gentle man shall be Shem and I will be Japheth, and taking the mantle of charity, we will walk backward and cover the nakedness of our common father." The effect was instantaneous and overwhelming. The day was won. And a more popular orator than Dr. Cox was not heard during the anniversaries. The great picture that was made to represent the for mation of the Evangelical Alliance in London in 1846 has, 39 8 IREN&US LETTERS. as its central figure, the person of Dr. Cox addressing the Assembly. His speech on that occasion is considered by those who heard it as the greatest of his whole life. Much opposition was made by the European delegates to the in sertion of the doctrine of future punishment into the plat form then forming. The Americans, insisted upon its intro duction. Dr. Cox was selected by them to make the speech in defence of their views. He spoke and conquered. Be fore his exhibition of the revelation of God's will in his word, his vindication of the faith of the saints, and his vivid illustrations of the harmony and relations of the several parts of the evangelical system, the fears and unbe lief of good men went down out of sight, while the glory of the Lord rose upon the minds and hearts of the Council. It was a triumph of truth to be held in everlasting remem brance. But not in sacred eloquence only was Dr. Cox illustrious. His reading was encyclical, his mind cyclopedic, his tongue fluent, mellifluous and tireless. Tap him on any subject, and the stream came bright, sparkling, refreshing, like a mountain torrent, or a meadow rivulet, or a deep, broad, majestic river, filling the listener with joy, often with amaze ment, always with new impressions. These sudden corrus- cations were the best things he did. His labored prepara tions were actually sometimes dull. I heard him preach two hours before the American Board at Pittsfield, Mass., and the audience were tired to exhaustion. He himself was so mortified by the failure that I pitied him. Just think of that ! And yet the next day there sprang up a question in regard to Popery in the Sandwich Islands, and he went off with a philippic against the Man of Sin, and the woman with a bad name in the Revelation, so full of argument, wit, ridicule, fact, scripture, poetry, chronology, prophecy and pathos, that a great congregation were roused, melted, and convulsed. Such outbursts as these suggested the remark when the November meteoric shower was first observed, that Dr. Cox's head had prgbably exploded. And something very like a meteoric shower it was when MEMORIES OF DR. SAMUEL HANSON' COX. 399 we were assembled in the Academy of Music to receive the Astronomer, Prof. Mitchell, and listen to him on behalf of a projected Observatory in Central Park. The house was filled with the most brilliant, intelligent, scientific and cul tivated audience. Word Was brought that sudden illness prevented the eloquent Astronomer from leaving his bed. This word was sent to me by the Professor, and in despair I went to Dr. Cox on the stage, told him the distressing truth, and implored him to come to the rescue, or the occasion would be lost. The assembly joining in the request, he complied, and when the applause, on his rising, had subsi ded, he said : " To put me in the place of such a man as Prof. Mitchell is like putting a rush-light in the place of Ursa Major." And then he proceeded to deliver a strictly astronomical discourse of three-quarters of an hour, that electrified the assembly: every illustration and allusion of which, including many scripture quotations, were drawn from the science itself, as if it were the study of his life, his only study. Not one man in ten thousand would have been found equal to such an effort in such circumstances. In fact, as Mr. has recently said there are not more than thirty men in Boston who could have written the works of Shakespeare, I will undertake to admit there is not one man in New York who could have made that speech. And thus might I run on into other pages of reminis cence of this wonderful man, the most remarkable man of the last generation in the pulpit of New York. If a merry heart is good as a medicine, how many doctors' bills Doctor Cox has saved me. What noctes ambrosianae I have had with him in the fellowship of the saints whom he drew into that circle of Christian Brothers known as X. A. in New York ! He was its founder ! Its jubilee came this year, and Dr. Adams was appointed to recite its history. But he pre ceded the founder by a few brief weeks to a holier fellowship on high. I do thank God for such men, for their friendship, for genial intercourse, nightly converse, and daily service with such servants of Christ. Their names were long 40 I RE N^. US LETTERS. since written in heaven. The earth seems dim since their light has gone out. And as I close this letter, the thought comes to me with overpowering, but also with exhilarating, almost rapturous effect, that this companion ship will soon be renewed, and into the widened circle will come the wise and the good of all ages and lands. That company will never breakup; that feast and flow will be everlasting. University of California SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed. -RENEWABLE DUE 2 WKS FROM \\G DATh RECEIVED UC SOUTHERN REG ONAL LIBRARY FACLT Uni\