wT- ^S FAREWELL ADDRESS W. CAMPBELL, M.L.C., THE ELECTORS OF THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE, I{b Sjictcljci in % ^tslatfoe Cnui|dl INIQUITY OF THE "LAND TAX ACT." Melbourne, Wh Jpril, 1882. \\\.\.YM\ \ SANDS & McDOUGALL, PRINTERS, COLLINS STREET WEST. 1882. i^S^l ' M mi THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES FAREWELL ADDRESS W. CAMPBELL, M.L.C., THE ELECTORS OF THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE, %* ^$tt$p m t\t %t$hh\w m\{til INIQUITY OF THE "LAND TAX ACT." Melbourne, 14th April, 1882. Mklboubne : SANDS & McDOUGALL, PRINTERS, COLLINS STREET WEST. 1882. TO THE ELECTORS OF THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE. Dear Friends, and Gentlemen, On the eve of my departure from Victoria to visit my native home, after holding a seat in the Legislative Council for the last twenty years, I cannot refrain from expressing my gratitude for the honor you did me in twice electing me to that most honorable and most responsible office. I presume to say that I discharged my duties to the best of my humble ability, under an independent, fearless, patriotic feeling, and that I know no vote of mine that I would wish to rescind. I am aware that I am considered an ultra-Conservative, but my conservatism aimed only at the preservation of what was good in our laws and in our Constitution, and in the prevention of what was bad being enacted. I can conceive the consistency of a Radical, but not that of a lukewarm weathercock, who trims to every breeze. Although I have not taken a leading part in the Council, I natter myself to have done some good work, such as the alteration of the Kerang railway from the way of Elmore to that of Eaglehawk, by which the State will save about 100,000, and travellers a distance of about eighteen miles. I may add that I also had the honor, in 1851, of being one of the first of the twenty representative members of the first Legislative Council for the pastoral district now included in your Province, and I am the only member of that early body that now holds a seat in the Legislative Council. Political life entails sacrifice of time, and, except to place- hunters and recipients of members' pay, is unprofitable ; but the honor of having a voice in the making of the laws is of more value to a true patriot than any other consideration. I therefore trust that the young men who have a permanent stake in this new land will look upon it in that light, and that they will not allow adventurers and professional politicians to monopolize the government of the State. A most grievous law passed in 1877 I mean the "Land Tax Act" which I feel justified in referring to at some length ; and, in elucida- tion, I annex speeches made by me on that question in the Legis- lative Council, as reported in Hansard. The effect of the land tax has been to depreciate the value of laud, without even excepting the lands exempted from the tax, while, from the cheapness of money, land should otherwise have been relative! v much enhanced in value ; in fact, the imposition of such an iniquitous 4 tax has scared capitalists, great and small, from purchasing or from lending, under a feeling that a Parliament that has been guilty of the crime of confiscating a large proportion of the value of land may impose an equally unjust tax on mortgagees. It therefore becomes a most important question as to how to cure the evil effect of such a law, which is certainly a sore disgrace to the Parliament of Victoria. Probably the most practicable course would be to amend the " Land Tax Act" so as to embrace all real property, great or small ; a very small percentage, taken from the valuation made by the shires and municipalities, would be sufficient. The small owner of a few acres would only have a few pence to pay, and would not feel the tax, but he would participate in an improved state of the country. If there is a necessity of relieving the small owner of land from any pressure of taxation, why not take it off his tea and sugar and clothing ? This would not only be a gain to him, but it would remove the stain of an iniquitous^ tax, which is a disgrace to our legislation. The Imperial Parliament recently passed an Irish Land Act under which owners have their rents fixed by commissioners, who may fix it fairly or may not ; and Lord Cairns calls it confiscation. But, bad as it is, it is harmless compared with our land tax. It is general, whereas our tax exempts ninety-eight per cent, of the landholders. It may be asked, Why did such an act become law ? It has been said that the public feeling was in favour of such a tax, but such is not true. No doubt, a land tax was mooted at the general election, but not an unjust, unequal, class tax. In fact, Mr. Cuthbert, who repre- sented the Government in the Council, stated in his speech, on moving the " Eeply to the Address " on the 26th June, 1877" I don't know that the country has approved of any particular land tax." This statement (see Hansard), comes from one who represented two successive Administrations in direct opposition to each other, and who should be considered a good exponent of the voice of the people. It may, however, be affirmed that a desire to accommodate the Opposition in attempting to defeat the Berry Ministry had an injurious influence on several members of the Council, who wished for a change. Two important questions were then on the tapis, viz., Payment of Members and the Land Tax. The Opposition tactics were to reject the former, and allow the latter to pass; but both passed. The former is certainly impolitic, but it does not disgrace our statutes, as the latter does. This colony possesses rich lands and mines, temperate climate, and the most central position of any of the Australian colonies, and it only requires just laws to induce other colonists to make it their home ; but if the holding of a few extra acres renders the owner liable to a penal class tax, it is likely to induce an emigration instead. I am not now liable to pay the land tax, nor am I unfavourable to a wide distribu- tion of the lands in many hands ; but cannot see why one who purchased land from the State at the price of the day should be taxed, while smaller owners are exempted. Let us see what Dr. Adam Smith says on taxation. His first maxim is that " The subjects of every State ought to contribute towards the support of the government as nearly as possible in proportion to their respective abilities ; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the State." J. Stuart Mill, who is a Liberal, follows Smith in these principles of justice, which are, I trust, inherent in the hearts of the mass of the people, but some of whom are frequently misled by designing, envious, impecunious, wicked demagogues. In 1881 an " Amending Land Tax Bill" was discussed by the Council, and rejected without a division. The following extracts are made from the speeches of members who voted for the Bill in 1877, most of whom bitterly regret the crime they committed then. Let us see what they have to say in palliation of their votes. Mr. Balfour : " I conceived that it was only right that the Council should bow to the popular will, and that we should show ourselves prepared to submit to a tax on land, with the hope that the next time the same question arose the law should be amended so that its inequalities and unfairnesses should disappear, and its incidence become at least more equitable." Mr. Robertson: " I voted for that Bill, not because I believed it was based on an equitable principle, but because we were assured that its enactment would bring political peace and rest, which the country wanted. That was my object in voting for the measure, and at the present time I scarcely know whether to compliment myself for the I gave on that occasion. There is no doubt that the 'Land Tax Act' has had the effect of reducing the value of all country lands at least fifty per cent." Mr. Robertson gives the following quotation from J. S. Mill, on an exclusive tax on realised property : " Should the scheme ever enlist a large party in its support, the fact would indicate a laxity of pecuniary integrity in national affairs scarcely inferior to American repudiation." Mr. "Wallace : " But, though I voted for the existing Act, I do not believe in the land tax. I do not believe in any class tax. I have seen the injury which the land tax has done, and I intend to vote against the present Bill." Mr. Belcher : " I desire to say that I voted for the present 'Land Tax AcV under the belief, as I stated at the time, that it would be the thin edge of the wedge for an all-round land tax. Since then I have found that I was wofully mistaken ; and I am not ashamed to acknow- ledge that I very much regret the vote which I gave on that occasion." Mr. Sumner follows : "I am very much in the same position as the honorable gentleman who has just addressed the House. I believed in direct taxation, and was under the impression that the tax would be so extended as to be equitably distributed on all kinds of property." It is most remarkable that a debate that extended over four nights should not have anyone to support the Bill, except the member repre- senting the Government. On the motion of Sir Charles Sladen, the following reasons were appended on the rejection of the Bill : 1. Because, under tlw pwtanoe of miring revamp "" to i* in Halation of tho first four of the maxims, or principles, laid down by Adam Smith, and universally accepted by political economists, namely : " The subjects of every State ought to contribute to the support of the Government as nearly as possible in proportion to their respective abilities ; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respec- tively enjoy under the protection of the State. In the observation or neglect of this maxim consists what is called the equality or inequality of taxation." 2. Because the tax is really not imposed for revenue purposes (as publicly declared by the Chief Secretary and the Attorney-General), and no tax for other than revenue purposes should be imposed without due notice being first given of such intention. 3. Because the tax, contrary to all principles of justice, is imposed upon the land of only 828 out of over 48,V^ THE CEOWN LANDS AUSTRALIA. \ CROWN LANDS OF AUSTRALIA: BEING AN EXPOSITION OF THE LAND REGULATIONS, AND OF THE CLAIMS AND GRIEVANCES OP THE CEOWN TENANTS; WITH DOCUlENTAM EVIDENCE APPENDED; \ TOGETHER WITH A FEW HINTS UPON EMIGEATION & THE GOLD FIELDS. BT WILLIAM CAMPBELL, LATE MEMBER OP THE IF^IouATIVB COUNCIL OP VICTOBIA. JOHN SMITH & SON, GLASGOW; WILLIAM BLACKWOOD & SONS, EDINBURGH AND LONDON. 1855. GLASGOW : PRINTED BY WM, EADIE AND CO. PRINCE'S SQUARE. O \5o Melbourne, 22d May, 1854. William Campbell, Esq. M.L.C. Melbourne. Dear See, We, the undersigned Tenants of the Crown, cannot permit youio leave this colony without tendering to you the expression of our warm thanks for the ability, energy, and perseverance you have dis- played in advocating the cause of tho pastoral interests of the community. Appreciating as we do the sincerity which has ever formed the groundwork of your action in this cause, and feeling that your interest in it can never be diminished, we venture to request that you will represent our grievances to the Home Government, and maintain the rights you have ever so consistently upheld. Wishing you a safe and happy voyage to your native land, and the realisation of all your hopes in re- visiting it, we remain, Dear See, Yours very faithfully, D. Maclachlan. William Snow Clifton, J.P. F. Taylor. John Goodman, M.L.C. J. H. Kerr. Wm. J. T. Clarke. Fred. Fenton. Alexr. Cameron. J. West, tertius. A. G. Brodribb. William Paterson. Wm. Degraves. W. B. Hamilton. Lewis Clarke. J. Sutherland. James Hum. Duncan Cameron. James Webb. J. M. Loughnan. G. B. Maicke, M.D., F.B.S. Thomas U. Bhyder. W. Bobertson. A. M. Campbell, J.P. John Brock. Gideon S. Lang. J. H. Boss. Matthew Harvey, M.L.C* Bobt. Boss, J.P. Andrew Bussell, M.L.C. John Carfrae, J.P. Alexr. Macallum. * M.L.C. Member of the Legislative Council. G47009 Melboubne, 26th Mat, 1854. Mr Deab Sie, In forwarding yon the inclosed Address, I cannot refrain adding some personal expressions of gratitnde for your exertions in a cause in which, with many others, I am deeply interested. Only aware of your projected departure within these last few days, I have not obtained many signatures, which, if time had permitted, would have been hut too willingly joined to the list of those already appended. I will only mention, that every tenant of the Crown in Melbourne has availed himself of the opportunity to express his admiration of the con- sistent and honest career which you have pursued with so much ability and determination. Believe me, yours faithfully, D. M'LACHLAN. W. Campbell, Esq. M.L.C. The reluctance felt by the Writer, in publishing the foregoing Address and Letter, was overcome, with the view of showing that he was author- ised to represent the grievances of the Crown Tenants of Victoria. CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION, CHAPTER I. LEGAL DOCUMENTS REVIEWED. Order in Council Sufficient Land open for Sale Tenders for Runs Transfer of Leases guaranteed Investment of Capital Expense of Survey and Settlement of Boundaries Lord Grey's Despatches Reserves not required Crown Law Officer's opinions Population all employed in Pastoral pursuits Increase and decrease of Wool Legal claims Governor's power limited Responsibility of British Government Representation of Pastoral Interest destroyed Scheme of Compensation, _.__^._----3 CHAPTER II. IMPOLICY OF DISTURBING THE LAW. Power to Sell Challenged Pre-emptive Right Opinions of Crown Law Officers Instructions to concede Pre-emptive Right Instructions disobeyed Urgent request for Re-consideration Opinion of Law Officers of Victoria Reserves not justified Survey of Runs retarded by Survey of Townships Population dispersed Agrarian feelings fostered Cause of Scarcity of Butcher Meat Capitalists leaving the Colony Decrease of Stock Policy of granting the Pre-emptive right Lands applied for Average price of Land Crown Tenants' capital idle Policy of the Order in Council Government bound to establish rights Decrease of Agriculture Intimidations and Misrepresentations of the Press Squatters' want of confidence in the Government, 16 CHAPTER III. OPINIONS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL. Mr. Johnson's Motion, relating to the Sale of Land at the Gold Fields, amended Colonial Secretary's Admission of the Pre-emptive Right Motion for the Extension of the Settled Districts defeated Immediate issue of Leases and Sale of Lands under the Pre-emptive Right recommended by a majority of 18 to 9 Reference to the Home Government Provision in the Draft of the New Constitution for the fulfilment of the Promises of the Crown, - - - 25 CHAPTER IV. OFFICIAL DESPATCHES TO AND FROM THE COLONIAL OFFICE. Delay in the Settlement of the Question Strength of Claims confided in Want of Representation Compensation suggested by the Duke of Newcastle Errors regarding the Views and Claims of the Squatters Development of the Re- Vlll sources of the Colony Compensation suggested by the late Lieutenant- Governor Error regarding the Maximum of Pre-emptive Right Quibbling Governor can only legally refuse to Sell such Lands as are described in the 7th Section of the "Order in Council" Admission of Claims Injustice of Ante- dating the Leases Appeal to the Law Sale for Speculative Purposes illegal Infringements unnecessary Colonial Secretary's interpretation of the Privi- leges of the Crown Tenant Disproportionate Sale of Lands under the Pre- emptive Right in the several Districts, ------- 31 CHAPTER V. EFFECTS OF THE GOLD DISCOVERT. Gold discovered in Victoria on the 8th July, 1851 Derangement of the industry of the Colony Agricultural decrease High prices Impolicy of refusing the Pre-emptive Right Bad faith of the Executive Sufficient land legally open for Sale Leases due long before gold was discovered Crown tenant entitled to the increased value of lands applied for Population quadrupled High Wages diverted many from the Gold fields Gold fields inexhaustible Auriferous soil not adapted for agriculture Rich volcanic soil convenient Produce of bulky articles practicable Gold exchanged for Flour Expense of farming Squatters the principal agriculturists near the Gold fields Their importance acknow- ledged by the Lieutenant-Governor, --------38 CHAPTER VI. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS IN CONCLUSION. First Settlement of Port Phillip in 1835 Difficulties of the Early Settlers The Result of their Success Created Commercial Prosperity Provided Means for the Development of the Gold Fields Led to the Discovery of Gold Produc- tion of Enormous Exports Ex-Squatters greatest Opponents to the Pastoral Interest Mr. Foster's Interpretation of the Rights of the Squatters, in 1851 Wages in Victoria in August 1854 Duke of Newcastle's application of the same Law differently Opinions of eminent Barristers Mr. Robert Lowe's Interpretation, in 1847 Second Edition of the "Order in Council" proposed The People misguided by the Press Produce of Two Millions' worth of Ani- mal Food Modification of the Land Regulations Scheme of Compensation by the Melbourne Chamber of Commerce Condemnation of the Procrastina- tion of the Lieutenant-Governor, and the Despatch of the Duke of Newcastle Home Government's Responsibility Legal Proceedings in defence of such Rights Prevention of a State of Anarchy Settlement of the Question before the Control of the Crown Lands is given the Local Legislature Representation of Pastoral Interest swamped Safety of Rejecting the dictation of the Press Honour of the Crown pledged Legal and Moral Claims entitle the Crown Tenants to a Recognition of their Rights Abstract Conclusions demonstrated, 44 HINTS ON EMIGRATION, _ _ 55 INTRODUCTION. The great pastoral interest of Australia had its origin in the foresight and enterprise of the late Captain John Macarthur of Camden, who will be ever memorable in the history of his country. That great interest was the means of creating every other interest not even excepting the great gold interest ; and Captain Macarthur may there- fore be justly held the father of a country soon destined to become, if under a wise and just go- vernment, a great and mighty empire. In 1803, Capt. Macarthur lodged a paper in Lord Hobart's office in London, in which it is stated, " Captain Macarthur is so convinced of the practicability of supplying this country with any quantity of fine wool it may require, that he is earnestly solicitous to prosecute this, as it appears to him, important object; and, on his return to New South Wales, to devote his whole attention to accelerate its com- plete attainment. All the risk attendant on the undertaking he will cheerfully bear he will re- quire no pecuniary aid and all the encourage- ment lie humbly solicits, is the protection of Go- vernment, permission to occupy a sufficient track of unoccupied lands to feed his flocks." The Government acceded to his wishes, and ultimately gave him a large grant of land; and it need scarcely be said that his prophetic convictions were realised: his flocks increased rapidly under his care and good management. Others followed his example : the lands were lying waste : the Go- vernment very wisely encouraged their occupa- tion ; and licensed any free and respectable person who desired to occupy them. Commissioners were appointed to manage these waste lands, and the occupants voluntarily paid an assessment to defray the Commissioners' expenses, and that of the po- lice under their direction, so that their occupation might not cost the Government anything. But in the course of time, when nearly all the available lands within a practicable distance were occupied, great evils were experienced from the arbitrary acts of these functionaries, who assumed great power in defining the extent of runs, by lessening one run in order to enlarge another. They were accused of receiving bribes, and of acting very unfairly between man and man. The occupants were powerless against the Government, as they had only an annual licence they could not be otherwise than dissatisfied they required a better tenure, to secure them against the irresponsible XI acts of an arbitrary Governor and his needy subor- dinates they agitated their grievances, and ulti- mately obtained an equitable title to a lease upon definite terms, with a preferable right to purchase at a fair value. They obtained that title through an Act of Parliament, and an Order of Her Majesty in Council. They were grateful for that boon granted to them, and were encouraged to improve their property, under the fullest confidence that the promise of the Queen, under the sanction of the Imperial Parliament, would be held sacred. In this, however, they have been much disap- pointed, as Her Majesty's representative in Victoria violated that promise, by refusing to give the oc- cupant of Crown lands the stipulated pre-emptive right, and otherwise illegally disposed of such lands to their prejudice. The tenants of the Crown (for such is the proper designation of the Australian squatter) protested against such arbi- trary infringements. The executive procrastinated for years, and were encouraged in their indecision by the clamours of the press. Ultimately the question was referred to the decision of the Home Government; and, after a waste of seventeen months' time, was left in as unsettled a state as ever by the indefinite despatch of the Duke of Newcastle, which is reviewed in the fourth chapter. In the meanwhile a great gold-producing in- terest sprung into existence, and now seemingly excuses the executive from the fulfilment of pro- Xll mises and contracts entered into by the Crown and its tenants; but which promises and contracts ought to have been fulfilled years before any pro- duce of gold existed in Victoria : indeed, both the Crown and the tenant implemented the leases, as is proved in the first chapter. The Crown tenants are therefore entitled to be placed in as good a position as that in which they would have been, were it not for the procrastination of the executive. It is impracticable to restore the lands which have been illegally sold; but it is absolutely necessary, for the ends of justice, that equivalent compensa- tion be made to the injured pioneers of Australian civilisation; and if the executive, through an ap- parent pressure of expediency, are to continue such violations of the rights of property, they are bound, by the pledged honour of the Crown, and by every principle of honour and of justice, to make provi- sion from the Crown lands to indemnify the arbi- trary abrogation of such rights. An erroneous impression prevails regarding the privileges of the tenants of the Crown, which re- quires prominent correction. It was published by Mr. Robert Lowe in 1837, that the Crown tenants had a monopoly of buying the lands at 20s. per acre; whereas the truth is, that they have only a right to buy the land at a, fair valuation, which the Governor may fix at the highest obtainable price, but which can never be lower that 1 per acre. The Act 5 and 6 Victoria is embodied in the Xlll Appendix (No. 1), merely to complete the code of land regulations : it was amended by the Act 9 and 10 Victoria, A pp. 3, and is applicable only to the Settled districts. The reader will therefore ob- serve that the legal claims of the Crown tenants are chiefly founded upon Nos. 3 and 4 of the Appendix. The appropriation clause in the Assessment Act (App. No. 2), which was in force when the leases were demandable, shows that the Crown tenant is liable only to be assessed for lccal purposes: and that the attempt made by the Executive in the Legislative Council last session to increase the rent, by an exorbitant rate of assessment, in order to meet a deficiency in the general revenue, was illegal and unjust ; and the exclusion of the appro- priation clause in the new Act was an indirect in- vasion of the rights of the Crown tenants : so much so, that they are, in the absence of such security of the proper appropriation of their assessment, legally justified in refusing payment of it, as the Act is thereby not in accordance with the Order in Council, nor with the former Act. Such illegal invasions upon the rights of the Crown tenants, having no limit affixed, indicate what they might have to expect from the Legislature hereafter, if it was legally empowered to decide upon their claims which the Home Government is in honour and in justice bound to settle, before the Crown lands are handed over to the Local Legislature, in which the XIV representation of the pastoral interest is swamped by the formation of superfluous townships in the pastoral districts. The Colonial Secretary, by such invasions, evidently forgot his interpretation of 1851. See page 47. The First Part of the Appendix is composed of legal documents, which form a complete code of the law of the sale of Crown lands, and which are reviewed in the first chapter. The Second Part contains the opinions of the Crown law officers, which, though not forming any part of the law, go far to explain and strengthen that law : they are reviewed in the second chapter. The Third Part contains the votes and proceed- ings of the Legislative Council bearing on the question; but they can only be received as expres- sions of opinion on the part of that body, which were not empowered to interfere with the man- agement of the Crown lands. It also contains opinions of distinguished barristers; protests and memorials from the Crown tenants, in defence of their rights; correspondence between the Lieu- tenant-Governor and the Secretary of State for the Colonies ; together with a report from the Melbourne Chamber of Commerce, condemnatory of the encroachments of the Government, and suggesting a scheme of compensation. The Fourth Part consists of statistical returns. The long complicated despatch of the late Lieu- tenant-Governor was enough to mystify the subject XV to one of more leisure than the Duke of Newcastle, who in his reply was evidently misled by that des- patch, and so misapprehended the rights of the Crown tenants; otherwise his Grace could not have left such an important question in such an unde- cided state, to the injury of the peace and pros- perity of the Colony at large. The length of that despatch precludes it from a place in the Appendix. Lest the strictures which are necessarily made upon the official acts of the late Lieutenant Go- vernor may appear personal, I take this opportu- nity of expressing the greatest respect for the private character of that gentleman; but the re- presentation of the grievances of an injured class of fellow-colonists being confided to me, I should fail much in my duty were I to allow any respect for private worth to shield the author of these grievances from public exposure. I haye briefly touched upon the effects of the gold discovery in Victoria, which, although only disclosed to the government in the month of July, 1851, was actually discovered a year and a half before then. I have also briefly touched upon Emigration, which may be benefited by a modification of the land regulations, in order to dispel erroneous im- pressions prevailing regarding them. I have prefixed an Address from the Crown tenants of Victoria, with a letter from Captain D. M'Lachlan, late of the Rifle Brigade, explaining XVI how the address was not more numerously signed : this I do in order to show that I am authorised to represent the grievances of that body. And feel- ing honoured as a representative of such a respec- table body, and in grateful appreciation of their mark of confidence, I have voluntarily undertaken, in the absence of a professional man, the compila- tion and publication of documentary evidence in proof of their rights ; and only regret the imper- fection of the exposition which I have thus ven- tured to demonstrate. W. CAMPBELL. Cakraith, November, 1854. CHAPTER I. LEGAL DOCUMENTS REVIEWED. Order in Council Sufficient Land open for Sale Tenders for Runs Transfer of Leases guaranteed Investment of Capital Expense of Survey and Settlement of Boundaries Lord Grey's Dispatches Re- serves not required Crown Law Officer's opinions Population all employed in Pastoral pursuits Increase and decrease of Wool Legal claims Governor's power limited Responsibility of British Govern- ment Representation of Pastoral Interest destroyed Scheme of Com- pensation. On the 9th March 1847, an Order in Council, under the authority of an Act of Parliament, entitled the occupants of crown lands beyond the settled districts in New South Wales, to "demand" leases, for 8 and 14 years, in their respective districts, with a preferable right to purchase during the continuance, and upon the expiration of the leases. App. 3 and 4. On the 7th October 1847, Her Majesty's representative, the Governor of New South Wales, promulgated the Order in Council, and required the demands for leases to contain a clear description of the boundaries supposed extent estimated capabilities of the runs, &c; and to be made within six months of that date, under pain of for- feiture. App. No. 6. The Order in Council reserved a power to extend the intermediate districts up to the 1st January 1849. The colony was accordingly divided into three districts Set- tled, Intermediate, and Unsettled. The lands in the settled were left, as formerly, open for sale by auction. The lands in the unsettled districts to be held under lease for fourteen years, and during that term, " not open to purchase by any other person, except the lessee." (App. No. 4, Sect. 6.) The lowest price to be