L-'H^ ri-r*.iS?^ . V-- ^ ' . V ^»r ^■^, \< X RAID AND REFORM RAID AND REFORM BY A PRETORIA PRISONER ALFRED P. HILLIER, BA., M.D., CM. AUTHOR OK " IN THE VELDT " UY HAKl.EV '■ Let no one who begins an innovation in a State expect that he shall stop it at his pleasure, or regulate it according to his intention." Machiavelli. WITH TWO ESSAYS ON THE ANTIQUITY OF MAN IN SOUTH AFRICA ILontion MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1898 All rie'liis rcsctTcd Richard Clay and Sons, Limited, london and bungay. DT TO MY MANY SOUTH AFRICAN FRIENDS I DEDICATE THIS LITTLE BOOK 13041S0 INTRODUCTION In the history of the Transvaal several raids have occurred. They have for the most part been made by the Boers into the territories of their neighbours, none of whom have entirely escaped these un- welcome visits. To the south they invaded the Free State, to the west Bechuanaland, to the east Zululand, and to the north an expedition intended for the territories of the Chartered Company was only checked on the banks of the Limpopo, where the Boer leader was arrested. These " incursions" on the four points of the compass, of which no Select Committee could hesitate to record "an absolute and unqualified condemnation," although characterised by a certain broad impartiality, were, fortunately perhaps for the general welfare of South Africa, only successful, and that in a small measure in one instance, the invasion of Zululand. In 1895 ^t was given to the Boers themselves to sustain and repel an " incursion." With the causes of unrest in this young country viii INTRODUCTION which have produced these disturbances, and the history of the more important of them, the following pages deal. Of the events culminating in the crisis of 1895-96, the crisis itself, and some of the con- sequences attendant thereon, I have written freely and unreservedly. All trials, imprisonments and inquiries being now at an end, there is no further necessity for silence ; and what a participator may feel disposed to say with reference to the motives and actions of himself and others durino- the occurrence of this now historic incident, may thus find due expression, without prejudice to any one. Of the Boers themselves I should like to say a friendly word. During a residence, at one time and another, of sixteen years in South Africa, beginning with my boyhood, I have known many of them, and count among their number not a few friends. I have fought side by side with them through a campaign on the Kaffir frontier of the Cape Colony, in which many European lives, including that of my brother, were lost. I have hunted with them, travelled for weeks by waggon with them, and lived amongst them, and I know them to be possessed for the most part by kindly if rugged natures. They have much in common, bolli In lis virtues and defects, with the old Puritan side of the English character, and they INTRODUCTION ix possess much of that grit which is inherent in the British race. There is, I beHeve, no Euro- pean race to-day more nearly allied to the British in strong natural characteristics than the Dutch of South Africa. But the isolation of two hundred years has weaned a section of them from civilisation ; and ignorance, and the prejudices arising from ignorance, have been the chief cause of all our troubles with them. Though, in fairness be it said, for these troubles the vacillation of the Colonial Office in bygone years has also been a good deal to blame. Throughout the Reform movement in Johannes- burg, from 1892 onwards, which was in effect for equality of rights among the white men of the country, the feeling was not one of hostility to the Boers ; it was one on behalf of fairplay. And in reform lay the true interests of Boer as well as Uitlander. I have briefly commented on the Proceedings of the British South Africa Select Committee, and in doing so I have been guided both by my personal knowledge of "the Origin and Circumstances of the Incursion " and also by my own observation as a spectator during the greater portion of the inquiry in the Committee Room at Westminster. The first of the following essays, in the form of a historical review, contains at its conclusion a state- b X . INTRODUCTION ment of the position as it appeared to the writer in Johannesburg in December 1895, which was pub- Hshed in The Star at the time just before the crisis. " The Origin and Circumstances of the Incursion " and the period of imprisonment are then dealt with. Of the last two essays on the Antiquity of man in South Africa, there is little need be said in the shape of preface. They are the result of some research and reading in less troubled times than those recently experienced in the Transvaal ; and on the advice of some literary friends I have inserted them for the perusal of such readers as may feel an interest in the dawn of aboriginal native life in the country. They formed the basis of a paper which I read before the British and American Archaeological Society in Rome last February, a prdcis of which appeared in the Journal of the Society's proceedings. ALFRED P. HILLIER. 30, WiMPOi.E Street, London, W. December, 1897. CONTENTS PAGE I. The Transvaal and its Story. A Historical Review down to 1894 i II. The Origin and Circumstances of the Incursion into the South African Republic of an Armed Force, 1895-96 23 III. The Diary of a Political Prisoner in Pretoria, April and May, 1896 82 IV. Appendix— Letter to the Secretary to the British South Africa Select Committee . . 107 V. The Antiquity of Man in South Africa in VI. Prehistoric Man, and the Parallelism in Develop- ment between the Primitive Races of Europe and the Native Races of Africa 142 RAID AND REFORM THE TRANSVAAL AND ITS STORY A Historical Review^ down to the Year i8g^ Young and growing countries have but little time for the production of literature, and South Africa is no exception to this rule. Nevertheless, South Africa has produced a historian of talent, patriotism, and industry in McColl Theal. In five goodly- volumes Mr. Theal has recorded for the benefit of his own and succeeding generations the history of South Africa from its earliest times in the fifteenth century down to the year 1872. It is a history full of incident and interest, clearly and truthfully written, and I can cordially recommend it to South African readers. For the purpose of this Review, however, I propose confining myself to that portion of the work which deals with the history of the emigrant farmers, who, leaving the Cape Colony in 1836 and 1837, gradually dispersed themselves over B 2 RAID AND REFORM the country to the north of the Orange River and in Natal. Previous to this date, in the early thirties, several English missionaries, traders, and hunters had visited these territories, and were familiar with the country as far north as the Limpopo. Among them were the Rev, Dr. Moffat, David Hume from Grahamstown, Captain Sutton, and Captain Corn- wallis Harris, whose wonderfully illustrated work on the fauna of South Africa is so well known to naturalists and hunters. We find, however, that in 1837, Commandant Potgieter, at the head of a Boer commando, after a successful encounter with Mose- likatse, issued a proclamation formally annexing a large tract of country including the present South African Republic. While the limits of a Review will not allow of a full investigation of the causes which led to the extreme friction between the trek Boers and the British authorities, it is, I think, necessary to refer to one of the most prominent of them, as it was not only one of the original causes of the trek from the Cape Colony, but has been a constant source of irritation both north and south of the Orange River since. This has been an excessive and frequently misdirected zeal on the part of missionaries and others on behalf of the native races. To South African farmers — Dutch and English alike — who are in daily contact with these races, and who have THE TREK BOERS AND BRITISH AUTHORITIES 3 only too good reason to know what the real nature of the South African savage is, it has been extremely galling to have to hear from European missionaries and others constant complaints and frequently ex- aggerated charges made against farmers generally to the authorities in Downing Street, who, in former years, showed themselves only too ready to defer to the demands of the Exeter Hall party. That these same farmers, as a body, are nevertheless capable of dealing with the natives in a firm and at the same time considerate manner, is shown by the status of the native in the Free State. Here the first of all essentials in the treatment of natives is observed, and drink is forbidden. Such a thinor as a drunken native is almost unknown in the Free State ; their locations are as a consequence cleanly and comfort- able, and if these things be not Godliness, they are with the savage the first true step towards it. The pious horror of Exeter Hall has not succeeded in stopping the native liquor traffic in British colonies. After the first settlement in the Transvaal fresh families continued to come in, and the districts of Lydenburg, Potchefstroom, and Rustenburg were formed, each with a separate commandant. The district and township of Pretoria were founded in 1855. These earlier years of this northern Re- public were stormy times for the emigrant farmers ; their hearts were great, their aspirations high, and £ 2 4 RAID AND REFORM in endeavouring to spread themselves over huge tracts of country they met with terrible losses from fever and from the numerous Kaffir tribes with which they came into conflict. The tragedy of Dingaan's Day, when Piet Retief and sixty-five followers were treacherously massacred to a man while on an expedition into Natal, will never be forgotten while South Africa has a history. Nor will the fate of that gallant little band of English- men, seventeen in number, who with some fifteen hundred native allies marched on the Zulu army from Durban to avenge the fate of their Dutch friends. Four of the Englishmen survived, the rest lay dead on the field of battle. The Zulu force was 7,000 strong, but Theal says : "No lion at bay ever created such havoc among hounds that worried him as this little band caused among the warriors of Dingaan before it perished." The boundaries of the Transvaal Republic were at length practically determined by the establish- ment of the British in Natal and in the Orange Sovereignty after the battle of Boomplaats, in which Sir Harry Smith defeated the Boer force. The subsequent withdrawal from the Orange Sovereignty of the British Government against the wishes of a large number of inhabitants brought into existence the Orange Free State. In 1844 a code of thirty-three articles was drawn STEPHANUS JOHANNES PAULUS KRUGER 5 Up and adopted by the Volksraad at Potchefstroom, and this was practically the Constitution in existence in the Transvaal Republic till the year 1857. At this date an event memorable in the history of the Republic occurred, an event highly interesting from a constitutional point of view, and of special interest to those — not yet citizens of the State — resident in Johannesburg. In 1857 the Republic north of the Vaal attained its twentieth year. It had increased in population, and had taken on to some extent the habits and modes of life of a settled community. Mr. Pretorius and his followers began to feel that in the altered circumstances of the State the time had arrived for a remodelling of the Constitution Among these followers of Pretorius, these advocates for reform, it is interesting to find, was Mr. Ste- phanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, now President of the Transvaal. Mr. Theal says : " During the months of September and October, 1856, Com- mandant-General W. M. Pretorius made a tour through the districts of Rustenburg, Pretoria, and Potchefstroom, and called public meetings at all the centres of population. At these meetings there was an expression of opinion by a large majority in favour of an immediate adoption of a Constitution which should provide for an efficient Government and an independent Church." And again, later on, we have, in the words of South Africa's historian. 6 RAID AND REFORM the gist of the complaint against the then existing state of things. " Thecommzcnity of Lydenburg was accused of attempting to domineer over the whole country, ivithout any other right to pre-eminence than that of being composed of the earliest inhabitants, a right which it had forfeited by its opposition to the general weal.'' Such was the shocking state of things in this country in 1856. It was a great deal too bad for such champion reformers as Mr. Pretorius and his lieutenant, Mr. S. J. P. Kruger, as we shall see later on. Shortly after these meetings were held, a Representative Assembly, consisting of twenty-four members, one for each field-cornetcy, was elected, for the special purpose of framing a Constitution and installing the officials whom it should decide to appoint. It had no other powers. The represen- tatives met at Potchefstroom on the i6th December, 1856, and drafted a Constitution. I will not go into the details of this Constitution, but will merely remark with regard to it that all the people of the State of European origin — and not a mere section of them — were to elect the Volksraad, in which was vested the legislative power. On January 5th, 1857, the Representative Assembly appointed Mr. Marthinus Wcssels Pre- torius President, and also appointed members of an Executive Council. In order to conciliate the THE REBELS ^ people of Zoutpansberg, the Commandant of their district, Mr. Stephanus Schoeman, was appointed Commandant-General. They chose a flag — red, white, blue and green. The oaths of office were then taken, the President and executive installed, and the flag hoisted. When intelligence of these proceedings reached Zoutpansberg and Lydenburg there was a violent outburst of indignation. At a public meeting at Zoutpansberg, the acts and resolutions of the Repre- sentative Assembly at Potchefstroom were almost unanimously repudiated. Mr. Schoeman declined to accept office under Mr. Pretorius, and a Mani- festo disowning the new Constitution and everything connected with it was drawn up. The Government then issued a proclamation deposing Commandant- General Schoeman from all authority, declaring Zoutpansberg in a state of blockade, and prohibiting traders from supplying " the rebels " with ammuni- tion or anything else. This conduct on the part of the new Government under Mr. Pretorius appears to me distinctly adroit. Having taken upon themselves to remodel the entire Constitution of the country, they turn round on the adherents of the older Government, whom by the bye, they had not thought it worth while to consult, and promptly call them "rebels." And so you have this striking political phenomenon of a 8 RAID AND REFORM revolutionary party turning on the adherents of the Government of the State and denouncing them, forsooth, as "rebels." What matter for the student of Democracy does not this incident afford ? Here you have the demo- cratic spirit carried to its extreme point, to its logical conclusion. What did these hardy Republicans think ? What did they say among themselves ? They said, " We, the people of the country, are the sovereign power of the country ; what the majority of us determine on is what we have a right to demand, is what we will have." By the people and for the people was the instinct which dominated them and guided all their movements. The old Government no longer represented the majority of the people, it must give way to the one that did. There was but one appeal ; it was to the sovereign power — the people themselves. They declared for a new order of things, a new Government, and all who resisted it became in their eyes rebels, even though, as we have seen, they were loyal to the original Government of the country. Loyalty ! there was but one loyalty they knew, — loyalty to the common weal, loyalty to the people of the country. " The Volksraad under the old system of Govern- ment was to have met at Lydenburg on December 17th, 1856. At the appointed time, however, no members for the other districts appeared. What INCURSION INTO THE FREE STATE 9 was transpiring at Pochefstroom was well known, and a resolution was therefore adopted declaring the district a Sovereign and Independent State under the name of the ' Republic of Lydenburg.' " And thus two Republics, two Volksraads, two Governments, were formed and existed simul- taneously in the Transvaal. And all this without a shot being fired, each party finding sufficient relief to their feelings by calling the other party " rebels." In order to strengthen their position the party of Pretorius now determined on a bold stroke. They sent emissaries to endeavour to arrange for union with the Free State. The Free State Government rejected their overtures ; but Pretorius was led to believe that so many of the Free State burghers were anxious for this union that all that was necessary for him to do in order to effect it was to march in with an armed force. He therefore placed himself at the head of a commando and crossed the Vaal, where he was joined by a certain number of Free State burghers. " When intelligence of this invasion reached Bloemfontein, President Boshof issued a proclamation declaring martial law in force throughout the Free State, and calling out the burghers for the defence of the country. It soon appeared that the majority of the people were ready to support the President, and from all quarters men repaired to Kroonstad." lo RAID AND REFORM At this Stage the Free State President received an offer of assistance from General Schoeman, of Zoutpansberg, against Pretorius, in which object he beHeved Lydenburg would also join. What the precise political status of Zoutpansberg may have been at this crisis I regret to say I have been unable to discover ; but the fact of the matter is, in the old days of the Transvaal they thought nothing of an extra Government or two in the country. As long as each individual white man was represented somewhere and somehow he was ap- proximately happy. The one thing he did abso- lutely decline was being left out altogether, which appears to be the position, by the bye to take a modern example of the little community of some hundred thousand Europeans living on the Rand to-day. The old burgher felt his individuality and respected it ; and while powder, shot, and shouting were available to him, he asserted it. " On May 25th the two commandos were drawn up facing each other on opposite banks of the Rhenoster river, and remained in that position for three hours." Threatened from the north as well as from the south, Pretorius felt his chance of success was small, and he therefore sent out Commandant Paul Kruger with a flag of truce to propose that a pacific settlement should be made. I can quite believe that in this graceful act Mr. Paul Kruger appeared HIGH TREASON ii to great advantage. The treaty arrived at was practically an apology on the part of the South African Republic. Many citizens of the Free State who had joined the northern forces moved over the Vaal after this event. Those who remained, and those who had been previously arrested, were brouofht to trial for hio^h treason. One man was sentenced to death, but the sentence was mitigated subsequently to a fine, others were fined. These fines were again still further mitigated at the soli- citation of Messrs. Paul Kruger and Steyn, until it came to little more than ten pounds each. In fact, I find there was a good deal of mitigation all round at the conclusion of the various political junketings which characterised the early history of these Republics. Shortly after this event Zout- pansberg was incorporated with the Republic, and General Schoeman was appointed Commandant- General of the country. The Republic of Lyden- burg followed suit in i860, after considerable nego- tiations on both sides. Pretoria was then chosen as the seat of Government. One might naturally suppose that after such a series of political disturbances as has already been re- corded, the new Government would now have a peace- ful and assured future. It was united, and founded on the will of the majority of the people. But the spirit of unrest was upon them. One of the principal 12 RAID AND REFORM causes of disturbance among the Boers was un- doubtedly differences of opinion on ecclesiastical matters. At this time, 1858, there came to the country a clergyman named Portma, sent out by the Separatist Church from Holland. The minister settled at Rustenburg, and there founded the first branch of what has since become a famous sect among the Dutch, both in the Free State and Cape Colony as well as the South African Republic, and which is known in South Africa as the Dopper sect. Their principal point of difference from the Reformed Church, was an objection to singing of hymns as part of the Church service. To this sect Mr. Kruger and his immediate followers belong. In i860, President Pretorius, then President of the Transvaal, was elected President of the Free State, whither, after obtaining six months' leave of absence, he repaired, in the hope of bringing about union between the two Republics. No sooner had he departed than the old Lydenburg party showed signs of disaffection, protesting that union would confer much greater advantao^e on the Free State than on them. Mr. Cornelius Potcfieter, Landdrost of Lydenburg, then appeared in the Volksraad as the leader of the disaffected party. They contended that it was illegal for any one to be President of the South African Republic and the Orange Free State at the same time, and the upshot was that TWO GOVERNMENTS IN THE S. A. REPUBLIC 13 Pretorius resigned. Mr. J. H. Grobbelaar, Acting President, was requested by the Volksraad to remain in office. The partisans of Mr. Pretorius hereupon resolved to resist. A mass meeting was held at Potchefstroom, and they resolved unanimously that (a) The Volksraad no longer enjoyed its confidence, and must be held as having ceased to exist, (d) That Mr. Pretorius should remain President of the South African Republic, and have a year's leave of absence to bring about union with the Free State. (c) That Mr. S. Schoeman should act as President during the absence of Mr. Pretorius, and Mr. Grob- belaar be dismissed, (d) That before the return of Mr. Pretorius to resume his duties a new Volksraad should be elected. The complications that ensued on all this were interminable, too complicated for us to follow in detail, but suffice it to say some of the new party were arraigned for treason and fined ^100 each — another man ^15 — that after this for several months there were once more two Acting Presidents and two rival Governments in the South African Re- public. Then Commandant Paul Kruger called out the burghers of his district and determined to establish a better order of thingrs. Having driven Schoeman and his adherents from Pretoria, Commandant Kruger then invested Potchefstroom, which after a skirmish in which three 14 RAID AND REFORM men were killed and seven wounded in all, fell into his hands. He then pursued Schoeman, who fairly- doubled on his opponent, and re-entered Potchef- stroom. Commandant Kruger hastily returned, and at this stage President Pretorius interposed. After this followed elections and re-elections until Commandant Jan Viljoen raised the now familiar standard of revolt. He was engaged by Kruger's force, and after a skirmish, in which Viljoen's forces were defeated, Mr. Pretorius again intervened. A conference lasting six days now finally settled matters. Mr. Pretorius took the oaths of office. The Volksraad met in May, 1864. "With this ceremony the civil strife which had so long agitated the Republic ceased. When, a little later on, it was decided that all sentences of banishment, confiscation of property and fines which had been passed for political offences should be annulled, and that what- ever had been seized should be restored to its original owner, there was a general feeling of satis- faction." These prolonged civic hostilities were over, but they left their mark behind them. The Treasury- was empty, salaries in arrear, and native taxes uncollected. Moreover, the natural enemy of the South African pioneer, whether Dutch or English, the various Kaffir tribes both within and without the Transvaal border, were menacing the Boers. On the Zulu border for a considerable distance from BRITISH ANNEXATION OF THE TRANSVAAL 15 the frontier the farmers went into laager. Cetewayo was busy reviewing his troops, and in the Wakker- stroon district a commando was assembled ready to repel an invasion. In the early sixties both the Free State and the South African Republic found themselves involved in native wars. Basuto chief Moshesh was the foe whom the Free State had to contend with. Zoutpansberg was the -scene of the Transvaal disturbances. In both instances the Kaffirs belong to what Theal describes as the mountain tribes of the Bantu family. I have referred to the early history of this Republic in some detail because I think it is new to most of us, and because it is full of incident and interest for all of us. What follows is better known to the world. In 1877 the Transvaal was annexed by the British Government, and was administered first by Sir Theophilus Shepstone, and secondly by Sir Owen Lanyon. Some of the principal reasons alleged for this annexation were : — " The increasing weakness of the State as regards its relations with neiofhbourino- native tribes, which invited attack on the country and upon the adjoining British possessions." " The state of anarchy and faction that prevailed in the country." "The danger of invasion by Sekukuni and Cetewayo." "The paucity of public funds with which to cope with this state of things." Of this period of the history of i6 RAID AND REFORM the country a good deal has been written in a book called The History of the Transvaal by John Nixon. The annexation at the outset appears to have been received with mixed feelings. Some strongly ap- proved, some sullenly acquiesced, while the Volks- raad sent a deputation to protest in England. Grumbling soon began among the Boers, and meetings were held. In 1879 Sir Theophilus Shepstone, a South African by birth, and one thoroughly in touch with the Boers, was superseded by Sir Owen Lanyon. Sir Theophilus was always ready to drink a cup of coffee and talk matters over with any disaffected Boer visitor. Sir Owen Lanyon was a stiff-necked British soldier, full of fads and prejudices, and soon felt that he was completely out of touch with the Boer population. Had some constitutional assembly been formed during Shepstone's rdgime, wherein the Boers had full representation and control of their own internal affairs, and Sir Theophilus been retained in office, there are writers who think it probable that peace would have been maintained. But be that as it may, events took a different course. In the meantime, it is worthy of notice that the two great native enemies of the Transvaal, Sekukuni within their borders, and Cetewayo in Zululand, were both attacked and defeated, the former by a force under Sir Garnet Wolseley, the MR. GLADSTONE AND MAJUBA 17 latter after considerable losses by Lord Chelmsford and Sir Evelyn Wood. In the Zululand campaign Piet Uys and a small body of Boers from the Republic did good service, Piet Uys, a brave leader, losing his life, but the large body of Boers held aloof. In 1880 affairs in the Transvaal again reached a crisis. According to Nixon, " the levying of taxes on the Boers by an administration in which they were totally un- represented " was the principal cause. Add to this the attitude of Mr. Gladstone, who, while in opposition, had condemned in unmeasured terms the annexation of the Transvaal, and who had just now come into power, and the case for the Transvaal is an in- telligible one. What followed early in 1881 is too well known to need repetition. The British forces under Sir George Colley were hurried up to the Natal frontier, and, without waiting for reinforce- ments, engaged the Boers and were defeated. After this the policy of retrocession was decided on by the Gladstone Cabinet, and the independence of the Republic recognised. Great Britain, in both the Pretoria and London Conventions, retaining the right to supervise treaties with foreign powers. We have now to deal with another and important phase of this State's progress and material develop- ment. For some years previous to the date at which we have now arrived in our historical review, c i8 RAID AND REFORM gold had been discovered in the Lydenberg district, and this was followed by still further discoveries in 1883, which led to the formation of Moodie's Com- pany and the foundation of Barberton. As the mineral resources of the country became known, new comers poured in, and with their capital and enterprise opened up the mines of that district. Prospecting went on all over the country, and in 1886 gold was discovered in the Witwatersrand district. What that discovery meant for the South African Republic we now know. From being a thinly-populated grazing country, with very little in the way of funds in its State coffers, it has become the wealthiest and most prominent State in South Africa. Its population has been increased four or five fold, and every farmer has been enriched by getting a market in the country for his pro- duce. Farms have risen in value throughout the land ; and there is not a burgher to-day who in his heart does not thank heaven for the prosperity which the capital, the energy, and the enterprise of the mining community in the country have brought him. And yet, what is the political status of the mining men in tlic country? — the men who j)r()vide four- fifths of the revenue, and who have j)oured wealth alike into the coffers of the (jovennnenl and the pockets of the farmers. Their position is that ihey POLITICAL MONOPOLY 19 are allowed to have neither part nor lot in the government of the country. In thus enriching the country it is true this community has materially enriched itself; but wealth is not everything, and it is as demoralising for the Boers as it is for the mining population that all political rights should be withheld from the latter. Men amonofst us are reproached for merely getting all the money they can together and then leaving the country. In the first place this is true of only a small minority, and who can blame them for leaving? Entirely shut out from public life, what has the country to offer them to induce them to remain ? In any large com- munity there are always a few men in whom the instincts of public service are so strong as to inevit- ably lead them to become public servants of that community, — men who feel themselves capable and anxious to serve the public, and who for the most part, let the motive be what it will, serve them faithfully and well. Year by year such men as these are driven from this country by the existing state of things. There is a question which arises in one's mind after this brief review of the history of the country which I think one may fairly address to the Govern- ment and burghers of this State : Are they to-day meting out to us the political justice which they have ever insisted upon from the State for .themselves ? c 2 20 RAID AND REFORM What induced them or their fathers to frame a new- Constitution at Potchefstroom in 1857 ? The feehng that the majority of the white inhabitants were not properly represented in the Government of the country ; the feeling that the community of Lydenburg were attempting to domineer over the whole country without other right to pre-eminence than that of being the oldest inhabitant, a right which it had forfeited by its opposition to the general weal. What was one of the principal causes which led them to throw off the British yoke in 1881 ? The objection to being taxed by an Administration in which they were unrepresented. Are we not labouring under all these disabilities to-day ? The one retort to this is that we are Uitlanders. That is to say, that in a country not yet sixty years old, in which the population has been formed almost entirely by immigration, in which the President himself is an immigrant, the mining com- munity, who have been coming in for at least fifteen years past, and have done more in developing the material resources of the country in that time than was ever conceived in the wildest dreams of the earlier inhabitants, are foreigners. What proportion of tlic burghers of this State were actually born in the country ? — this State, which owes its prosperity and its progress alike to the continuous stream of immigration. The President at least was not born THE PRETORIA OLIGARCHY 21 here. The fact is that what was originally a Republic, and what we hope to see once more a Republic in deed as well as in name, has, by con- tinually tinkering with the franchise law, become an oligarchy. I have had some little difficulty in obtaining the information with regard to the various alterations in the franchise law, but I am indebted to Mr. Charles Leonard for the following. I gather that originally every white man had a vote. Subsequently every white man not born in South Africa had to pay ^15 to get the vote. Later, in 1874, strangers who had no land in the country had to live here one year to get the vote. The acquisition of land qualified them at once. Next, in 1882 burghership could only be obtained after living in the country and being registered on the field-cornets' books for five years and paying £2^. In 1887 the law fixed fifteen years and the payment of £2^. In 1890 the Second Volksraad was established. The inestimable boon of a vote for this body, whose decisions are liable to revision by the First Raad, is obtainable after being resident two years, taking the oath and paying £^. At the same time the law was altered to permit admission to the right to vote for the First Raad after ten years, and to become a member after fourteen years. In 1893, without reference to the people, the law was altered so that 22 RAID AND REFORM we are virtually excluded for ever. The law was confirmed in 1S94, and there was added a clause by which children born here cannot get the vote unless their fathers have taken the oath, an oath which, remember, deprives a man of the citizenship of the country he came from, and offers him something" less than half citizenship of this in return. The tendency of this legislation is perfectly clear ; it is from makinof the franchise difficult to makinor it impossible for the inhabitants of the Rand. We are growing old as the years go by, and if the Raad wishes to be logical and consistent it will assuredly next Session pass a Bill excluding the grandchildren of Uitlanders. We have sketched the growth of this State from its earliest days to the present time. A^ofe. — The above paper was published in Johannesburg in the Sfar in December, 1895, and contains at the conclusion a statement of the position as it then appeared. MACHIAVELLI 23 *'THE ORIGIN AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE INCURSION INTO THE SOUTH AFRICAN REPUBLIC OF AN ARMED FORCE" " Let no one," says Machiavelli, " who begins an innovation in a State, expect that he shall stop it at his pleasure or regulate it according to his intention." And Machiavelli, who lived in the early days of the small Republics of mediaeval Italy, and who had witnessed their intrigues, their corruption, and their decay, knew whereof he was writing. There seems to be a Nemesis, some mad but watchful Fury, that waits on political reform, that sees with jealousy its every movement, and tarries not in her pursuit. To Englishmen of this generation, reared in the free air of Anglo-Saxon liberty, she exists but as a shadow — to Machiavelli, the child of political corrup- tion, tyranny, and intrigue, she seemed as some dark spirit of destiny brooding for ever over the freedom 24 RAID AND REFORM of mankind. Have students of evolution, the phi- losophy of history, all the science of the ages, dis- covered any inexorable law of nature ? or must we regard it as the irony of fate, whereby all small Republics, as far as history knows them, beginning with those of Greece and includinor those of mediaeval Italy and of South America, inevitably end either in perpetual faction strife, in oligarchy, or in tyranny ? That which was founded on the in- stincts of justice and freedom seems to engender licence, and the greed and ambition of the few- govern the destinies of the many. In South Africa the Transvaal during the few decades of its exist- ence has been no exception to the rule. Despising Anglo-Saxon civilisation, yet with no civilisation of their own to fall back upon, the Boers have hovered between savagery and the civilisation they have in vain endeavoured to forsake. Having a language, a patois with "neither a syntax nor a literature," the sons of the wealthy are sent to English schools and universities, and English books almost entirely fill the shelves of every library in the country, thus showing that in their hearts they appreciate the civilisation they affect to despise. Ten years ago the inllux of new comers began to settle on the Rand. And as this inllux increased and advanced with ever-gaining strides, the Boers ANGLO-SAXON CIVILISATION 25 realised that the world and civilisation were once more upon them. In spite of all the opposition that patriarchal prejudice could muster, railways usurped the place of the slow moving ox-waggon, and in the heart of their solitude a city had arisen ; while to the north and to the east between them and the sea were drawn the thin red lines of British boun- dary. The tide of Anglo-Saxon civilisation — that strong ever-flowing current, on whose bosom all barks are borne as freely as on the open sea — had swept around and beyond them to the banks of the Zambesi and to territories even further north in the interior of a continent of whose existence they were but dimly conscious. A primitive pastoral people, they found themselves isolated, surrounded — " shut in a kraal for ever," as Kruger is reported to have said, — while the stranger was growing in wealth and numbers within their gates. Expansion of territory, once the dream of the Transvaal Boers, as their in- cursions into Bechuanaland, into Zululand, and the attempted trek into Rhodesia, all testify, was be- coming daily less practicable. One thing remained, — to accept their isolation and strengthen it. Wealth, population, a position among the new States of the world had been brought to them, almost in spite of themselves, by the new comer, the stranger, the Uitlander. What was to be the attitude towards him politically ? Materially he had 26 RAID AND REFORM made the State — he developed its resources, paid nine-tenths of its revenue. W ould he be a strength or a weakness as a citizen — as a member of the body poHtic ? Let us consider this new element in a new State — how was it constituted, what were its component parts ? Was it the right material for a new State to assimilate ? Cosmopolitan to a degree — recruited from all the corners of the earth — there was in it a strong South African element, consisting of young colonists from the Cape Colony and Natal — members of families well known in South Africa — and many of them old schoolfellows or in some other way known to each other. Then the British contingent, self-reliant, full of enterprise and energy — Americans, for the most part skilled engineers, miners and mechanics — French, Germans, and Hollanders. A band of emigrants, of adventurers, and constituted, as I think all emigrants are, of two great classes — the one who, lacking neither ability nor courage, are filled with an ambition, character- istic particularly of the British race, to raise their status in the world, who find the conditions of their native environment too arduous, the competition too keen, to offer them much prospect, and who seek a new and more rapidly developing country elsewhere ; and another, a smaller class, who sometimes through misfortune, sometimes through their own THE UITLANDERS 27 fault, or perhaps through both, have failed else- where. Adventurers all, one must admit ; but it is the adventurers of the world who have founded States and Kingdoms. Such a class as this has been assimilated by the United States and absorbed into their huge fabric, of which to-day they form a large and substantial portion. What should the Transvaal Boers have done with this new element so full of enterprise and vigour ? This had been for the last ten years the great question for them to solve. Have they desired merely a political mono- poly for a passing generation of men from the very nature of their lives and training but poorly qualified for the sole control and conduct of the affairs of a rapidly developing country — or have they desired to lay the foundation of a permanent State, a true Republic, that might be sustained and upheld by those very principles of democracy which inspired and guided the Boer voortrekkers in the State's foundation? Hitherto they had steadily and with ever-increasing determination sought only political monopoly. Enfranchisement, participation in the political life of the State by the Uitlander, — this means, they said, a transference of all political power from our hands to those of men whom we do not trust. " I have taken a man into my coach," said President Kruger, "and as a passenger he is wel- come ; but now he says, Give me the reins ; and that 28 RAID AND REFORM I cannot do, for I know not where he will drive me. To the Boer it is all or nothing ; he knows no mean, no compromise. Yet in that very mean lies the vital spirit of republicanism. What is the position of the Boers in the Cape Colony ? Are they without their share, their influence, their Africander bond in the political affairs of the country ? And so it is through- out the world to-day, — in the United States, in England, in France, in the British Colonies, wherever the individual thrives and the State is prosperous — the compromise of divided political power among all classes, all factions, is the great guarantee of their well being. To this end all political evolution moves ; and whether it finds expression in a Republic or in an ancient Monarchy, "broad based upon the people's will" — will move while civilisation continues. So trite are these reflections that one almost hesitates to record them ; and yet so many are the admirers of the so-called sagacity of the Boer — so many who take the "all or nothing view" — that a restatement of them can do no harm. That the enfranchisement of the Uitlander would mean a complete transference of political power into his hands involves two assumptions : the first is that the Uitlanders would form a united body in politics ; the second is that their representatives would dominate the Volksraad. The most superficial BOER UNREASON 29 acquaintance with the action of the inhabitants of the Witwatersrand district on any public matter will serve to refute the first of these, while it is a well-recosTnised fact that there are amonofst the Uitlanders — among the South Africans especially — a large number of men whose sympathies with the Boers on many matters would run directly counter to what one might describe as those of the ultra- English section. The second of these assumptions — though it is continually put forward — almost answers itself. The number of representatives from the Uitlander districts under any scheme of redistribution of seats which the Boer could reasonably be expected to make would fall considerably short of those returned from the Boer constituencies. Such was the attitude of the Boers on this vital question which led to the Reform Movement of 1895 ; and I have stated what I believe to be the injustice of it as regards the Uitlanders and the unwisdom of it in the true interests of the Boers. I shall now deal with the Reform Movement itself, endeavouring to trace its real origin and object. The movement ended in a drama which attracted the attention of the world for more than a year, and to the proper understanding of which the House of Commons appointed a Select Committee of Enquiry. Before the Committee facts have been laid bare. 30 RAID AND REFORM misrepresentations and misconception, and in some instances the injustice resulting from them, removed. And the evidence recorded, together with the reports thereon, fill 600 pages of a Parliamentary Blue Book. The Committee appointed was constituted as follows : — The Attorney-General (Sir Richard Webster), Mr. Bigham, Mr. Blake, Mr. Sydney Buxton, Sir Henry Campbell Bannerman, the Colonial Secretary(Mr. Chamberlain), the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Sir Michael Hicks Beach), Mr. Cripps, Sir William Hart Dyke, Mr. John Ellis, Sir William Harcourt, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Labouchere, Mr. Wharton, and Mr. George Wyndham ; and they formed a strong an able and a representative Committee of the House of Commons. It was to the circumstances, rather than to the origin of the incursion, that the Committee devoted its most assiduous attention ; and with reference to them and the degrees of responsibility for different actions attaching to different persons, its findings, the result of exhaustive examination of witnesses, are clearly and impartially stated in their Report. The task was no ordinary one, and of the many issues involved there were some on whicli the Committee concentrated their attention. The reputation of the Colonial Office had been impugned ; ihc rcsp()nsil)ility of Mr. Rhodes had to be deter- CABLES V. BOREDOM 31 mined ; were the Chartered Company Directors impHcated, and if so to what extent ? A conspiracy was to be unmasked, a mystery to be unravelled, and to the questions which might involve this person or that, punctilious points of immaculacy in a Duke or a Colonial Office official, the Committee addressed itself with zeal, and with some suspicion of the relish which ladies bestow on a new-fledsfed scandal. Moreover they had amongst them a notorious gossip — Mr. Henry Labouchere. They confessed Charles Leonard rather bored them ; but the missing cables — Miss Flora Shaw, — here is matter indeed, my masters ! They resolved at the outset to divide their labours into two parts, and the first was, in the terms of the Order from the House of Commons, to "inquire into the origin and circumstances of the incursion into the South African Republic of an armed force." Within the "origin" of that incursion, came the history of the Reform Movement in the Transvaal ; and it must ever remain a matter of some reproach to the Committee that while they accorded to Mr. Schreiner, who probably has not spent more than a month in his life within the Transvaal, no less than nearly four sittings wherein to record his political views and demonstrate his ignorance of the true Uitlander position, they con- fined Mr. Charles Leonard, and that imder distinct 32 RAID AND REFORM pressure from the Chairman, to less than a single sitting. He is a South African by birth, and has, no less than Mr. Schreiner, both talent and patriotism. To the question of reform in the Transvaal during a residence of several years he has given unremitting attention and conspicuous ability, and he was the man of all others qualified to record in accurate detail the history of the movement which was the principal factor in the "origin of the incursion," and which it was the function of the Committee clearly to ascertain. That the Committee did not deal as systematic- ally with the " origin of the incursion " as was desirable in the true interests of the inquiry was, however, the fault of the Opposition rather than of the Government members. The Government itself being indirectly implicated through the charges made against the Colonial Office, the Government mem- bers, in their desire for the fullest inquiry, placed no check on the cross-examinations of witnesses by the Opposition members, and these form the bulk of the evidence taken. The Opposition members did not exhibit the same impartial spirit when witnesses were being examined on the history of the Reform Movement in Johannesburg — and of this, their interruptions during Mr. Leonard's evidence, which called forth a remonstrance from Mr. Chamberlain, was a striking THE SELECT COMMITTEE 33 instance. Mr. Labouchere's presence on the Com- mittee, which at least in character should have been a judicial one, was an anomaly at the outset ; and his retention thereon after his retractation of, and apology for, charges made under cover of privilege in the House of Commons, seemed to the lay mind unacquainted with the ways of Parliament and its Committees, almost a scandal. The members of the Committee who showed most regard for the terms of the Order from the House of Commons were Mr. Chamberlain, Mr. Wyndham and Mr. Bigham. But while one cannot help regretting that the proportion of time allotted to Mr. Leonard in which to give his evidence was not greater, one must admit on perusing the official record of it that he made the most of his opportunity. With quiet persistence he told his story, adroitly evading the irrelevant questions of the Opposition, and bringing out with clearness and emphasis the main points of the position which had culminated in the disaster of December, 1895. From the earliest settlement on the Rand down to 1892 the Uitlander had continued to hope that something like political equality on a fair basis would be obtained. In 1892 the National Union was formed, and at its meetings enthusiastic crowds attended, while speakers from among the Pretoria Dutch residents, notably Mr. Esselen, an ex-Judge of the High Court, and Mr. Wessels, a well-known D 34 RAID AND REFORM Pretoria advocate, were among those who addressed the meeting, expressing their sympathy for the desire of the Uitlander to attain to citizen rank. From 1892 to 1895 ^^^ history of the Reform Movement in Johannesburg was practically the work done by the National Union and its adherents — unaided, and even be it said discouraged, by the capitalists, who held aloof Petitions to the Govern- ment were sent in year after year. Resolutions calling for some amelioration in the conditions of the franchise law, the dynamite trade, education, and the courts of justice were passed both at the National Union meetings and by other public bodies — but all without avail. And not merely without avail — matters did not even stand still : they went steadily back. What had been possible when men entered the country was made impossible to them a few years later. And it was this retrogressive legis- lation, this actual setti^ig back of the hatids of the clock, that convinced men of the hopelessness of the position, that exasperated them even to conspiracy. Facts showing this retrogressive movement have been set forth in Mr, Charles Leonard's printed statement, and in some sense made public ; but op- portunity was not given to put them clearly in evidence before the Committee of Inquiry, and thus points of the most vital importance to the subject of the inquiry have been left out of that evidence, and the actual retrogression in Boer Legislation THE FRANCHISE 35 is not even referred to in the Committee's Report. As the Franchise Law stood in 1882, to quote from Mr. Leonard's printed statement, "it was enacted that in order to become naturalised and acquire full citizenship the new comer should have resided in the country for a period of five years, and should have been registered on the field-cornets' list for that period, and should pay a sum of twenty- five pounds." A provision, restrictive undoubtedly, but not wholly unreasonable. But mark what follows. "In 1890 a new departure was made. A law was passed in that year providing for the creation of a Second Chamber, called the Second Volksraad, to the powers and constitution of which further refer- ence will be made hereafter. It was enacted that aliens could acquire the right to vote for members of the Second Chamber after having been registered upon the field-cornets' list and having resided in the country for a period of two years. They had to renounce their allegiance to their own country, and to take the oath of allegiance to the Transvaal, and to pay the sum of five pounds for the privilege. After having been eligible to vote for the Second Chamber for a period of two years, the new-fledged voter, or naturalised person, as he is called in the Transvaal, became eligible for a seat in such Chamber. It was further provided in the same year D 2 36 RAID AND REFORM that no person who had been so naturalised could vote for a seat in the First Volksi'aad until the lapse of a period of ten years after he had become eligible for the Second Chamber. " No one could be a member of the Second Chamber until he was thirty years of age, and it will thus be seen that under no circumstances could a man eet the riorht to vote for the First Chamber until he was at least forty ; and during the interval that had elapsed from the period of his naturalisation he would be in the position of having renounced his allegiance to the country of his origin and having rendered himself liable to all the burdens of a citizen, including military service, and that in the meantime he would be deprived of the exercise of the most important rights of citizenship. But even then no one was of right entitled to the franchise. He could only get citizenship after fourteen years' residence and compliance with the above provisions, if the First Volksraad passed a resolution admitting him, and in ptwsuance of regulations which have never been framed!' " With regard to the Second Chamber it must be pointed out that this body bears no such relation to the First Volksraad as its name might at first sight imply. Its powers of legislation are strictly defined. It has no power to enforce its own acts, and no control whatever over the First Chamber. RETROGRESSION 37 All its acts and resolutions must be submitted to the First Chamber, which has the right to veto them ; and even if not so vetoed they do not acquire the force of law until promulgated by the President, who has the right to withhold such promulgation at his discretion. It need scarcely be added that the Second Chamber has no control whatever over the finances. It cannot be wondered that even ardent South African patriots like the late John Cilliers should have described the Second Raad as a mockery and a sham, and that the Uitlanders decline to regard it as of any real benefit to them." A sham and a mockery indeed, a withdrawal of the substance and a substitution for ever by statute of the shadow ! John Cilliers was not the only Transvaal burgher and patriot who saw with indig- nation and foreboding this retrogressive action. Let us take the testimony of Mr. Esselen in 1892 on the platform of the National Union. Mr. Esselen began his political career as a prominent member of the Africander Bond in the Cape House of Assembly ; he was then made a Judge of the High Court in the Transvaal, and having resigned that position took an active part in the politics of the country. On the occasion referred to at a meeting in Johan- nesburgf he said : "I agrree with this movement. I may tell you I am in entire accord with the move- ment of the National Union, and I am proud to be 38 RAID AND REFORM asked to say a few words. I wish to ask you whether you can give any credence to the state- ment of a man (President Kruger), who says he is going to unite two people, when the whole of his acts for the last ten years show it is absolutely un- true. I do not speak without knowing what I am talking about — I say you have been kept out of your political privileges, not because the people have kept you out from fear that your being granted these privileges would wreck or endanger the inde- pendence of this country, but to enable a few, and a greedy few, to rule the country for their ends." Other matters there were innumerable that at- tracted, nay, even demanded the attention of every thoughtful man, Uitlander or burgher, in the country during the years from 1890 to 1895. ^ have placed the Franchise question first — and for assigning it that position, there is, as we have seen, abundant reason given from intelligent and patriotic burghers themselves. The redress of all other evils was too obviously dependent on the redress of this one, and compared with it they became matters of secondary importance. Among them, however, were matters of such moment as an absence of municipal financial control for municipal purposes ; the dynamite mono- poly, an iniquitous tax on the great industry of the country ; an education law, which, out of the revenue furnished to the State by the Uitlander, MENACING THE COURTS OF JUSTICE 39 provided in effect solely for the children of the Dutch ; and anomalies with reference to the ad- ministration of justice whereby in the first place all juries were taken from the Dutch burghers, so that an Englishman living in the midst of a large Eng- lish speaking community was not even accorded a jury of his fellow-citizens. And then, finally, a con- tinual tampering with the Grondwet — the Constitu- tion of the country — by resolutions hastily passed in the Volksraad which not only kept in perpetual uncertainty the position of every man in the State, but even threatened, and that in no uncertain manner, the independence and stability of that last refuge of the Uitlander, the Courts of Justice themselves. So menacing did the position of affairs appear — even to the Chief Justice of the Republic — a man who at the last Presidential election was supported as a candidate for the Presidency — that in October. 1894, he felt it his duty to issue to the burghers, in words which will remain memorable in the history of the Republic, a solemn warning. The address was delivered at Rustenburg, and from it we shall do well to consider a few extracts : "No one who for a moment considers the condition of things in the State will deny that the country is at present in a very critical position. The unmistakable signs of an approaching change are apparent on every side. It entirely depends upon the people whether 40 RAID AND REFORM the impending change is to take place peaceably, or to be accompanied with violence. Do not let us close our eyes and ears to the truth. The people should thoroughly understand the true position of things. I repeat what I have just said, — the non- observance of and departure from the Grondwet menaces the independence of the State." " The country has a Constitution, and must be governed by its precepts, and in a statesmanlike manner. Let me repeat here what I said in 1892." " How frequently have we not seen that the Grondwet, which as the Constitution ought to stand on an entirely different footing from our ordinary law, has nevertheless been varied and treated as such ? Many a time has the Grondwet been altered by a simple resolution of the Legislature. By this means many a radical, and I am afraid often unwise change has been brought about in the Constitution. This objectionable and unstatesmanlike mode of pro- cedure can no longer be followed without impairing the progress and jeopardising the independence of the State." " The trek spirit has well nigh become extinct, the Republic has its beacons and bound- aries which, with the exception of our Eastern border, can no longer be extended. In the wise dispensation of Providence everything has its proper season. It is remarkable that, although our mineral treasures have for ages existed in the INFRINGEMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION 41 country, they have only recently been discovered and developed (by the Uitlander). It is equally remarkable that soon after we had to experience a movement (by Mr. Cecil Rhodes) which has defin- itely fixed the Limpopo as our northern boundary. These facts, together with the daily increasing popu- lation and the many complications arising there- from, indicate that we must more than ever devote our attention upon our internal and domestic affairs. There is but one safe course to follow in dealing with public matters under the altered conditions, — the country must be ruled in accordance with the recoo^nised rules of Constitutional Government." Further on in this same speech, the spirit in which a Volksraad Committee appointed to revise and piece together the Grondwet " devoted its at- tention to these same internal and domestic affairs," is somewhat severely commented on by the Chief Justice. Referring to their labours and the new draft Grondwet submitted to the Volksraad by them, he says it " contained such important radical and dangerous provisions that, had they been adopted, I do not hesitate to say the independence of the country would have come to an end," " the Courts of Justice from the lowest to the highest in the land would have been so affected in the independent exercise of their functions that it would simply have been an impossibility to have dispensed justice 42 RAID AND REFORM between man and man without fear or prejudice. The altered provisions in question assign powers and functions to the Executive and the Legislature which at present belong exclusively to the Courts of Justice. The very safe and constitutional rela- tion which, according to the Grondwet, existed between the three great powers" (Legislative, Exe- cutive and Judicial), or " departments in the State would have been so violated that the Courts of Justice would have tottered to their deepest founda- tions. The liberty, property, and other rights of people would have been placed in the greatest jeopardy, aye, the very independence of the Re- public, which is so inseparably connected with the independence of the Courts of Law, would thereby, as I have already observed, have come to an end." We had not been privileged to see this new Grondwet ; and by some miracle we had hitherto escaped its enforcement; the Volksraad was apparently in a cautious mood, and "these dangerous changes," recommended to them by a Committee chosen to deal with the subject, were rejected. The incident is, however, sufficiently significant of the feeling of unrest which the Volksraad was calculated to en- gender among every section of the community. It was in 1894 also that occurred the commandeer- ing incident. Englishmen, although accorded no civil rif^hts, were commandeered to serve in the BRITISH SUBJECTS COMMANDEERED 43 Malaboch Campaign. Five of them in Pretoria refusing to go were imprisoned ; they appealed to the High Court, but their HabiHty to service was upheld ; they were then taken under compulsion to the front. This caused the greatest indignation throughout the Uitlander community, and in- duced even the British Government to take action. Sir Henry Loch was despatched to Pretoria, and a pledge was given that no further commandeering of British subjects should occur. It was on this occa- sion that Sir H, Loch is reputed to have asked how many rifles the Uitlanders could muster. Another and continual source of irritation not only to the South Africans among the Uitlanders, but even amongr the burghers themselves, was the employment by the Executive of young freshly im- ported Hollanders to fill so many of the lucrative offices both hiorh and low in the State, to the ex- elusion of South Africans, many of whom had enjoyed the advantage of university education, who were imbued with a genuine love for the country and who naturally regarded the public offices arising out of the development of South Africa as a heritage for her sons. The Hollanders introduced by the Government were more truly foreigners to the burfjhers in lano^uaQ^e, in manner of life and in the type of their civilisation than even the most lately arrived Englishman. The educated South African 44 RAID AND REFORM Dutchman is to all intents and purposes an English- man : he reads English literature, English is his daily language, and he has the English love of athletics and field sports. To the Hollander neither the cricket bat nor the polo stick is a joy, nor is his literature that of Whyte-Melville or of Shakespeare. Of the corruption and abuses in the public ad- ministration I do not propose to burden this book with details. Their record has been revealed often enough ; they were, as the world well knows, one more continual source of exasperation. In the Volksraad itself it is only fair to say that there has always been a small minority of some few men who held enlightened views and a more far seeing patriotism. And among them must be remembered by the Uitlanders with some measure of gratitude such men as Mr. Carl Jeppe, Mr. Loveday and Mr. Lucas Meyer. Before concluding our brief review of events as they occurred in the Transvaal in rapid and even alarming succession between the years 1S90 and 1895, some reference to one of the most prominent, energetic and public-spirited men among the Uitlander community itself is necessary. Mr. Lionel Phillips was the senior resident partner in the wealthy house of Eckstein, and for four years 1892-95 was President of the Chamber of Mines. In common with other capitalists he held aloof from the political agitation which was proceeding under the THE MONSTER PETITION 45 auspices of the National Union until towards the end of 1895. Nevertheless, as President of the Chamber of Mines, and as a private citizen he never ceased pressing upon the Government the urgent necessity for redress with regard to the material burdens upon the industry; and as a member of the Council of Education he assisted both with money and personal supervision the furthering of its end. In 1895 th^ monster petition praying in respectful terms for admission to the Franchise, signed by 38,500 people, was presented to the Volksraad. It was rejected with jeers and with insult. Such then was the poition of affairs in the middle of 1895. And looking back on it all, with its opposing forces of stern unbending prejudice and ignorance on the one hand, and of an outraged democracy demanding the common rights of man on the other, it was, one must admit, a scene not unfamiliar to the pages of history. And it was a pretty quarrel as it stood. At this time the sympathy of the Progressive party among the Boers themselves, including, as we have seen, that of the Chief Justice of the country, the enlightened minority in the Volksraad, and many educated burghers throughout the land, was with the Uitlander cause. The irritation amongst the Cape Colonists, English and Dutch alike, over the recent question of the arbitrary closing of the Drifts (Fords) on the main wagon roads between the Cape 46 RAID AND REFORM Colony and the Transvaal, where they cross the Vaal River, was profound, and, as we now know, far reaching. So far had matters gone that towards the end of the year an arrangement was come to between the English and Cape Colonial Governments, where- by, in the event of what was nothing less than an ultimatum to the Boer Government not attaining its end in compelling them to throw open the Drifts, the two Governments undertook to share the expenses of a joint military expedition to the Transvaal. The ultimatum did attain its end, and the Drifts were thrown open ; but the incident was a significant one, and will show how near England then was to a policy of "an incursion into the South African Republic of an armed force." After the rejection of the monster petition of 1S95 the men of Johannesburg realised once and for all that, whatever else might come, to look for redress of their grievances by constitutional means was about as hopeless as would be the prospects of a syndicate which had for its object the pegging out of another main reef on the surface of the moon. In some sense the time seemed ripe for action, in another and a very vital one it was not. Politically, affairs had reached their nadir as far as one could see, \)Ut financially they were far from it ; the mines were in full work, the market was buoyant, and men RHODES, JAMESON AND BEIT ,47 were earning good incomes and big wages. Suc- cessful revolutions are usually accomplished on empty stomachs, and this element was wanting. Mr. Cecil Rhodes, who had practically fixed the Limpopo as the northern boundary of the Transvaal, while he had stretched that of the British Empire to beyond the Zambesi ; accustomed as he was to success, quick movement and rapid deve- lopments, in his great career ; had, to his credit, watched with impatient eyes the setting back of the clock within the South African Republic. His chief lieutenant, Dr. Jameson, who had shared with him the labour of reclaiming from barbarism and developing Rhodesia, and whose ambition was no less than his superiors, discussed with him the desirability of some active outside pressure ; and between them was evolved what is known as the Jameson plan. Mr. Beit, the capitalist, most largely interested in the mines of the Rand, an old financial colleague of Mr. Rhodes, both in the De Beers amalgamation and in the establishment of the Chartered Company, promised both his influence and his purse in support of the plan. Overtures were then made to Mr. Lionel Phillips, who was at the head of the Chamber of Mines, and Mr. Charles Leonard, the Chairman of the National Union ; and, as a review of the pre- ceding events will show, they came to them in a very tempting hour. 48 RAID AND REFORM In the light of subsequent events it is not difficult to be wise on this question ; it is a simple and indeed an orthodox attitude to condemn both the tender and the acceptance of these seductive proposals, and to be impartial it is right we should consider the views held by a few enlightened South Africans. With the internal movement going on in the Trans- vaal for the obtaining of reform, they said when the Jameson plan first came to their notice in Johannes- burg, the whole of South Africa and the world at large have every sympathy. The enlightened opinion among the Boers themselves is with you, and for that matter even expects a disturbance, possibly a rebellion, over the great question of the Franchise. In such a quarrel with the Govern- ment, it is doubtful if Kruger could get the burghers to take action, so strong is the sense among many of them of the anomalous position of Johannesburg. In any case the position cannot long remain unchanged, a solution must assuredly come. And if you must take action, rely upon yourselves, the justice of the cause, close down the mines, let the men go to Pretoria in a body and demand their rights. Any harsh measures under these conditions will be resented by the British Government, and the Boers know it ; but if you accept foreign aid, if chartered troops enter the country, the Boers will be welded as one man, all THE JAMESON PLAN 49 political anomalies will be forgotten, they will see only the independence of their country menaced, the Englishmen again invading the Transvaal ; the Free State will be with them ; your cause will be a lost one. And these views were not without wis- dom. They were right in foreseeing the dangers and impolicy of the Jameson plan ; they were wrong in expecting any substantial redress from the Boer Executive except under absolute compulsion. Both Mr. Phillips and Mr. Leonard were aware, if any men could be, of all the difficulties and the dangers of the situation. Mr. Rhodes was at that time at the very zenith of his power and of his reputation. He had shown himself a master of statecraft and diplomacy in dealing with men both in the English political and financial worlds and in South Africa, and any proposal emanating from him therefore carried with it the prestige which only one of the most able and most successful men of his generation could give it. Moreover, what a tower of strength his unique position made him, — Premier of the Cape Colony, Managing Director of the British South Africa Company, Chairman of De Beers : here was an ally indeed ! The plan at this early stage was presented in a very attractive form. A force under Dr. Jameson was to be quietly gathered on the border. The Johannesburg agitation, reinforced with E 50 RAID AND REFORM capitalist support, was to be steadily pushed forward. Rifles and ammunition were to be smuggled into Johannesburg. Both the High Commissioner and the Colonial Office might be counted on, it was said, to support a vigorous forward movement for reform. Mr. Phillips and Mr. Leonard, sick and weary of the hopelessness of unsupported constitutional action, and of the continual set back in Boer politics, already casting round in their minds for some new departure, accepted and from that time forth co-operated with Mr. Rhodes and Dr. Jame- son in the development of the Jameson plan. In October, 1895, ^ meeting took place at Groote Schuur, Mr. Rhodes' residence near Cape Town, at which were present, in addition to Mr. Cecil Rhodes, Mr. Lionel Phillips, Mr. Hammond, Mr. Charles Leonard, and Colonel Frank Rhodes. At this meeting the plan was more fully discussed and matured; and in November, 1895, when Dr. Jame- son visited Johannesburg, the details were finally settled. The letter of invitation was written, signed and handed to Dr. Jameson, and the date of com- bined action provisionally fixed for the end of December. Dr. Jameson's force was to be about 1,000 strong, and the start to be made when final!)- summoned by the signatories of the lctt(!r. In the meantime the J()hann('sl)urg leaders were to have sent in to them 4,500 rifles and 1,000,000 rounds of LETTER TO JAMESON Sr ammunition, and were, if possible, to arrange for an attack on the Pretoria Arsenal simultaneously with the move from outside. With regard to the letter of invitation which was subsequently used by Dr. Jameson as a justification for his start, there has, unfortunately, been a good deal of misunderstanding. It is now entirely a matter which concerns Dr. Jameson and the signa- tories of that letter which they gave him during the final arrangement of the plan in November, and without reference to others than themselves. But as it has been the subject of very careful inquiry on the part of the Select Committee, and as they have recorded their finding thereon in the body of their Report, it is only fair to the signatories of the letter to refer to it. The Select Committee's Report reads as follows — "As soon as the preparations were well advanced towards the latter end of November, 1895, Dr. Jameson, who had been with Mr. Rhodes at Cape Town, went to Johannesburg and procured a letter signed by Mr. C. Leonard, Colonel Rhodes, Mr, L. Phillips, Mr. J. H. Hammond, and Mr. G. Farrar. Mr. Leonard has stated that he was very reluctantly a party to giving this letter of invitation to Dr. Jameson ; and he has said in effect that it was given to afford a pretext which might justify Dr. Jameson with the Directors of the Chartered Com- E 2 52 RAID AND REFORM pany, and induce the officers and men to join him in the raid. This letter was shown to Mr. Rhodes by Dr. Jameson on his return to Cape Town ; and upon December 20th, 1895, ^^^- Rhodes asked to be supplied with a copy. Mr. Leonard, Colonel Rhodes, and Mr. Phillips have all distinctly stated that this letter was never intended as an authority to Dr. Jameson to enter the Transvaal, unless and until he received a further summons from them." Such was in brief the history of the Jameson plan as far as concerned Johannesburg". And it is necessary here to refer to the position with regard to it of the bulk of the men who subsequently constituted the Reform Committee. They at this time, with the exception of a few of their number, of which I personally was one, were entirely ignor- ant of what was going on. It was obvious that in such a plan as this the utmost secrecy was necessary ; and the Johannesburg leaders, relying on the general sentiment of the community, assumed the responsibility of arranging a basis of operations. So that the plan when it was gradually revealed to various men had either to be accepted by them in its entirety or rejected. There was not much time left for discussion and alteration of plans. Men demanded and received assurance ihal the- move- ment was to be a Republican one, and in no way to ATTEMPT TO ARM JOHANNESBURG 53. be an attempt on the independence of the country. A sufficient number of rifles were also to be forth- coming, and the High Commissioner was to be on the spot to expedite the adjustment of matters immediately disturbances arose. There was nothing in Johannesburg itself at a later juncture which caused so much dissatisfaction as what was held to be the inadequate supply of arms and ammunition. Many men held, and strongly expressed the view, that at least 10,000 rifles and an adequate amount of ammunition would be re- quired wherewith to arm Johannesburg. But they had to content themselves with a prospect of 4,500, which later was cut down to 2,500, and another 1,000 which Dr. Jameson was to bring in with him. True, more were to be obtained from the Pretoria Arsenal, but this was rather a counting of chickens still unhatched. It is of course easy enough to criticise this, as it is many other details of the scheme. It would have been a oreat thine no doubt to have had, when the time arose, 20,000 rifles to distribute among the eager crowd, but it is only fair to those concerned to consider the difficulties of obtaining them. In the despatch and the receipt of this contraband cargo the greatest precaution had to be observed. Every additional case or oil drum containing rifles added to the risk of detection ; while, most exasperating of all (in 54 RAID AND REFORM fact, there was one of our number who went so far as to declare it constituted a fresh Uitlander grievance), was the prolonged delay in their transit over the Netherlands Railway. During- the month of December was undertaken the extremely difficult work of sounding some of the leading men as to their readiness to support the plan, and every effort consistent with a degree of safety from detection was made at organisation. During November and December there were de- livered some memorable speeches, setting forth the Uitlander position and denouncing the Government; but no general public meeting was convened, it being deemed too dangerous to risk a premature and abortive explosion. On December 26th the Mani- festo was published in The Star. It was a long and exhaustive indictment, drawn up by Mr. C. Leonard, showing the injustice of the Uitlander position, and it concluded as follows : — a. What do we want ? b. How shall we get it ? I have stated plainly what our grievances are, and I shall answer with equal directness the question, "What do wc want?" We want : — 1. The establishment of this Rcpuljlic as a true Republic. 2. A Grondwet or Constitution, which shall be framed by competent persons selected by representatives of the whole people and framed on lines laid down by them, a Constitution which shall be safeguarded against hasty alteration. 3. An equitable Franchise Law and fair representation. 4. Equality of the Dutch and English languages. THE MANIFESTO 55 5. Responsibility to the Legislature of the heads of the great departments. 6. Removal of religious disabilities. 7. Independence of the Courts of Justice, with adequate and secured remuneration of the Judges. 8. Liberal and comprehensive education. 9. An efficient civil service, with adequate provision for pay and pension. 10. Free trade in South African products. This is what we want. There now remains the question which is to be put before you at the meeting of the 6th of January, viz., "How shall we get it?" To this question I shall expect from you an answer in plain terms according to your deliberate judgment. (Signed) Charles Leonard, Chairnian of the Transvaal National Union. In the meantime the course of affairs at head quarters was not running smoothly. The mihtary department under Colonel Rhodes were chafing at the tardy arrival of the arms and ammunition. The men organising the surprise on the Arsenal at Pretoria had reported that the scheme at that moment was entirely impracticable ; and they were confirmed in this opinion by an old and trusted officer of Dr. Jameson's, who had distinguished himself in the service of the Chartered Company, and who had been specially sent to Johannesburg to assist and advise in military matters. He stated that to pro'ceed with this scheme at that time would be nothing short of madness. The Christmas Naachtmaal, a religious festival, was being celebrated in Pretoria, and the town was 56 RAID AND REFORM thronged with Boers. To crown all came the flag incident, which was a misgiving on the part of a large number of the revolutionary party as to what was to be the true nature of the external support. It had arisen out of messages brought down from Cape Town, which implied that the Jameson aid would be accorded only to a move in favour of the Eno-lish flaof. Affairs were in a critical position, and a meeting was hurriedly summoned at Colonel Rhodes' house on Christmas day of December, 1895. It was soon obvious that postponement was an imperative necessity ; only a portion of the small supply of arms had arrived, the attempt on Pretoria Arsenal was impracticable, and a large section of the Com- mittee refused point blank to proceed any further with the undertaking until positive assurances with regard to the flag question had been received. Under these circumstances Mr. C. Leonard and Mr. Hamilton were despatched to Cape Town to confer with Mr. Rhodes, It has been suggested that the importance of the flag incident was exaggerated ; but it must be borne in mind that it was not merely a question of what men felt on the subject of English or Republican rule — it was a question of what they were pledged to. The movement within the Transvaal had from its outset been one in favour, not of a British REPUBLIC versus UNION JACK 57 Colony, but of a sound Republic. It was the one practicable basis on which it had been found possible to secure some sort of political union among a cosmopolitan community ; and on this ground it had been adopted. Many Americans and South Africans had accorded their support only on this understanding, and it mattered not what a man's affection for the Union Jack might be ; he had accepted the National Union Manifesto, and he was in honour bound to abide by it. No one will accuse Colonel Rhodes of ultra- Republican views, but in this instance he felt the obligation of his position, and frankly said so. The ground on which numbers of men had been induced to join the movement could not be departed from. On the following day Dr. Jameson duly received a telegram from Johannesburg, advising him that it was "absolutely necessary to postpone flotation." As the Johannesburg postponement has been the subject of a good deal of criticism, it will be of in- terest, in conjunction with what has already been said, to consider the finding of the Select Committee in their Report. It reads as follows : " There is a conflict of evidence as to what were the true grounds which determined the revolutionary party at Johannesburg on the 26th December to counter- order the insurrection which had been fixed for the 28th, and to prohibit the invasion of the Transvaal 58 RAID AND REFORM by Dr. Jameson, which had been settled for that day. Colonel Rhodes states that it was ' because they would hot rise before they got a distinct assur- ance about the flag, and they only got that on the Sunday morning. We were told in the telegram we got from Cape Town from C. Leonard that an entirely new departure had been decided on.' Dr. Wolff attributes the failure to the fact that * being unable to seize the Arsenal at Pretoria they were quite unprepared.' Mr. C. Leonard gives the same reasons, as well as the difficulty about the flag. Mr. Phillips says they had not arms for the men." It is difficult to understand what conflict there is in this evidence ; it is true that some of the witnesses did not assign all the reasons, but no single reason given is in conflict with any other. Moreover, any one of the reasons alleo^ed was enouoh to render postponement expedient, and taken altogether they rendered it imperative. But the crash was now nigh at hand. Dr. Jameson, instead of falling in with the Com- mittee's instructions, and the new departure decided on by Rhodes and Leonard, determined to march to Johannesburg. To quote from the Select Committee's Report: "When they (Mr. Leonard, Colonel Rhodes, and Mr. Phillips) learnt that Dr. Jameson was intending to start, so far from authorising liim to come in, they used every measure in tlieir power START OF THE JAMESON FORCE 59 by telegram and by messenger to prohibit and pre- vent the Raid, With the full knowledfje of all these circumstances, Dr. Jameson, being convinced that no rising was about to take place at Johannesburg, determined to bring matters to a head, and tele- graphed to Mr. Rhodes : ' We will make our own flotation, with help of letter which I shall publish.' Immediately upon the Raid becoming known, this letter, by the order of Mr, Rhodes, was cabled by Dr, Harris to Miss Shaw for insertion in the Times newspaper, with a date filled in which made it appear that it had been sent as an urgent appeal from Johannesburg just before the Raid." The news of Dr. Jameson's actual start on Sunday even- ing reached Johannesburg on the Monday afternoon through the medium of the public press, the Boers having been in possession of the intelligence some hours previously. The effect of this news on the Johannesburg leaders and the few others who were cognisant of the Jameson plan was one, to use no stronger term, of astonishment. They saw their plans blown to the winds — themselves discredited and apparently distrusted by their ally — the worst possible hour for action forced upon them ; and to what end, for what reason ? Whether Dr. Jame- son reached Johannesburg or not, would not this premature movement prejudice the whole cause } 6o RAID AND REFORM Would it not paralyse the High Commissioner's hand ? But if this was the effect on the minds of the leaders, what was it — what was it bound to be ? — on the great mass of people in Johannesburg, who, while thoroughly in sympathy with the movement for Reform, knew nothing of the Jameson plan ? What did it mean ? As far as was possible explanations were given. But it was difficult to make people understand why a man, in the position of an ally, had taken the step of marching into the country because he had been requested not to do so. One thing, however, they not unnaturally argued, and that was that the Johannesburg leaders were entirely in the dark. This, said a large number, is a move quite independent of us. Rhodes has evidently sent Jameson in with the full assurance that he will be supported by the High Commissioner and the British Government. Happy but brief delusion! On the very following evening the High Commissioner's proclamation was placed in their hands. I am reluctant to be thought hypercritical, but in view of the wholesale detraction and misrepresenta- tion to which the Johannesburg leaders and their followers have at one time and another been sub- jected by a misinformed Press, some expression of opinion, now that all the facts are known to the w(jrld, may not unreasonably find utterance. The THE STRONG IMPERIAL STATESMAN 6i wide mental habit which some one in Mr, Rhodes' case has described as that of " thinking in Con- tinents," is doubtless in a great and strong imperial statesman, as I hold Mr. Rhodes to be, an admirable trait ; and in so far as it is the expression of a lofty and generous ambition to further the spread of a free and enlightened civilisation, and the interests of that great nation in whose destinies he has such an abiding faith, I render it every homage. But it has its dangers ; the habit is somewhat infectious — it is apt to extend itself to colleagues, and even cable correspondents ; and if when carried into the field of practical politics — it is allowed to engender a certain scorn for prosaic details — its influence may be productive of failure, and even disaster. With regard to what followed, the story of Dr. Jameson's march and battle need no repetition. The news of Dr. Jameson's actual start filtered through to head-quarters in Johannesburg