SPEAKING
SPEAKING
BY
WILLIAM MAIE, M.A., D.D.
FORMERLY MINISTER OF THE PARISH OF EARLSTON ;
MODERATOR OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 1897;
AUTHOR OF 'DIGEST OF LAWS AND DECISIONS RELATING TO THE
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND,' ETC.
FOURTH EDITION
(SIXTH THOUSAND)
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS
EDINBURGH AND LONDON
1908
All Rights reserved
Y,
PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION.
ONCE again I send out this little book. The motive is
as fresh as ever, and the desire greater to be of use
to such as wish to speak well. Confidence in its fit-
ness also has been confirmed by still more testimonies
to the service it has rendered. One thing, however, of
an opposite sort has grown upon me the wonder and
unhappiness of seeing with what indifference many
who look forward to public speaking seem to regard
the need of preparation, and how unaware they are
of the detail, the thoroughness, and persistency re-
quired in it. The first difficulty apparently is to
convince a man that there is anything faulty in his
speech, and the next to induce him to begin at the
beginning with determination to master everything.
At first sight it seems incredible and might be
thought offensive when plainly written down, but it
is literally true that even the work of the infant
school has frequently to be done for themselves by
men who have already donned the robe of the public
orator.
It may be useful if I tell something of myself. I
had graduated, and with honours, when within a
month a friend worth listening to told me that some
of my English vowels were not good. It was a sur-
206733
VI PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION.
prise, for they were just like those around me. None
the less I there and then set to work, tooth and nail,
thankfully making the most of such means as were
then at command, and with no teacher in the body,
mastering one by one every vowel, every consonant,
every movement of the organs, words, phrases, sen-
tences, and all. Everything which this book now
advises to others I myself have done and done thor-
oughly, whether it seemed to be required in my own
case or not. Everything was of advantage. I was
severely careful to guard on the one hand against
half measures, compromises, and on the other against
substituting a new error for the old. Where such a
spirit is we may be certain difficulties cannot stand
their ground, and in no long time a firm sound foot-
ing is secured from which indefinite improvement will
proceed.
There is one hindrance to changing anything in the
speech which is of such influence and such interest
as to deserve special mention. Whatever the vowel,
consonant, modulation, or ought else that requires
amending, it has been the speaker's medium of
expressing his thought and feeling, and has thus be-
come bound up with his state of mind. He feels,
therefore, as if an amended medium were misrepresent-
ing him. It seems to him not exactly to fit and
convey his thought and feeling. The hearer may be
of the contrary opinion, but not he. He feels as if
it did not sound so natural, so impressive, so friendly,
so kindly, and what not. That may be true while he
has only half learned his lesson and speaks stiffly,
stiltedly, self-consciously, but no longer. This close
PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION. vii
association of mind with its medium of communication
is a very real barrier in the way of amendment. Not
only has a habit of the organs to be overcome, but
a more tenacious habit of the mind. The difficulty is
psychological as well as mechanical. And so it is
that one will speak a single word or syllable by itself
in the amended form with ease and satisfaction, be-
cause this is only mechanical, but the moment he has
got something to say he fails, because now the mind
dislikes the new form.
I should think it unkind not to call the attention
of young men to an obtrusive mispronunciation which
seems to be setting in among them in the unaccented
terminal syllable en, though I have already treated
of it on page 81. The authorities are unanimous
against them. The error is un-English, un-euphonious,
uncultured. Comparatively, it is not important, but
it is an example of the need of attention where none
is supposed to be necessary ; and, if it arises from an
effort at distinctness, it gives occasion to point out
that distinctness does not consist in always uttering
the, sound of every vowel and consonant. This would
require the sounding of I in psalm and of g in gnash.
The proper sound of every word and syllable has
first to be ascertained, and then given distinctly, as
is pointed out on page 80, foot.
To one who has the interest of any learner at heart,
and knows what is necessary, it must always be painful
to hear him say, as if it was enough, that he has read
through this book. The purpose of the book cannot
possibly be served by reading it through. This can
scarcely do more than waken interest in the number-
Vlll PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION.
less things that require attention. I can only repeat
the earnest counsel of last Preface to every youth to
work through the book, sentence by sentence, practising
as it directs on every point, and insisting on bringing
himself up to the mark wherever he comes short of it.
How hard the actor practises that he may have perfect
command of his voice ! It never was more a duty
than in these days of much public speaking to acquire
the art of speaking well. And those in the noblest of
professions should feel themselves constrained to aim
at excelling all.
Persons interested in their own speaking might
learn something by getting it " recorded " and repro-
duced by the phonograph. It does not reproduce the
quality, tone, timbre (p. 15) of the voice, but other-
wise it does exactly reproduce the spealdng, and doubt-
less would surprise as well as greatly help. Indeed,
I know it does. I believe most musicsellers can give
the opportunity, and at a trifling cost.
It has come the time when I shall most likely be
writing no more Prefaces, and I end this one as I
began the first. I there stated the motive which alone
could have led me to undertake the work. From the
same motive no pains have been spared on it. I hoped
that like-minded men would bestow like pains in the
use of it, and I shall not let go the hope. For
teacher and pupil together must acknowledge the obli-
gation, and should know the desire, to put their best
into the service of the Master in their use of His
great gift of speech.
W. M.
EDINBURGH, July 1908.
PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION.
THE reception given to this work has been so cordial,
and so many have expressed their indebtedness to it,
that in the present edition I could not but strive to
make it more useful still. In this I have had the ad-
vantage of the fuller knowledge which it has brought
me in regard to difficulties that are felt, as well as of
the continued and quickened attention to which the
subject has lured me. Some of the results are such as,
it seems to me, will be most profitably noticed at the
outset, and may fittingly find a place in this prefatory
note.
The first place is due to an acknowledgment of the
pleasure derived from the success of those who have
made resolute, well-directed efforts to improve their
speech. Then we have this charming hint for the
student who wishes honest criticism : ' My friend af-
fected ignorance of any defect in my articulation, but
since he saw I was in earnest he has been quite candid/
Some curious problems have been forced on the atten-
tion, as, why so many people like to read about faults
of speech without any serious purpose to correct their
own; why so many are content with a voice which,
compared with what it might be, is but a poor toy-
voice ; and why full-fledged philosophers from the uni-
versity should believe that a fault of years can be got
X PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION.
rid of as one would flick a speck of dust from his sleeve
on a Sunday morning. A young preacher so far missed
the mark in aiming to produce a certain vocal tone that
many friends had told him of it. At last he under-
stood the cause of the error, and the special practice
required to overcome it. Some months later, being
asked about his practising, he said he went over on
Saturday what he was to say on Sunday ridiculous
remedy for an inveterate habit. Another who said
'psawlrn' and 'keeng' gladly picked up the right
sounds, but a year later was surprised to be shown
that he had the old way as strong as ever. In spite
of advice, he imagined that, knowing the error, he
had only to give ' conscious attention ' (which should
be occupied with something higher) when the word
occurred.
Again, one is more and more impressed with the
exceeding great and widespread forbearance of men
toward their own faults of speech, and more and more
amazed at the complacency with which they palm off
on hundreds of hearers such carelessly executed work
as they themselves would not tolerate from their
clothier or their cabinetmaker. And this is the more
remarkable since those hundreds are far from being
ignorant of the treatment they receive. They know
very well the difference between good, bad, and indif-
ferent speaking, and they believe and feel that they
have reason to be dissatisfied because so many of those
who have obtained the right of addressing them should
have taken so little trouble to qualify themselves. Com-
plaints rarely reach the defaulter, but they float about,
and so also do regrettable sobriquets, as when one no
PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION. xi
worse than others is with ingenious fitness called the
schoolboy, and another is known as the corncrake.
1 Beginners,' writes one whose face I have never seen,
who is still educating himself ' beginners think they
are already doing all you recommend, and do not see
the necessity of taking trouble. Your book is of in-
estimable value to me. Every line of it is replefee with
meaning/ I wish beginners only knew with what
sympathy for them I have written, and with what
knowledge of their needs, taught by my own beginning
and that of many besides. Such a book as this would
have been an immense boon to me. And let me add,
the earlier they begin the better, and the less they
think they know and can do the better. My earnest
counsel to every youth is to work through this book,
sentence by sentence, testing himself on every point,
and insisting on bringing himself up to the mark wher-
ever he comes short of it.
That beginners should, if unwarned, make the mis-
take my correspondent attributes to them is hardly to
be wondered at in the light of such a case as I found
on my last holiday. An intelligent middle-aged min-
ister, speaking of the acoustics of a certain church,
described very correctly the manner in which one
ought to speak everywhere, saying it was his own
way. It chanced that very soon afterwards I sat
where he officiated. At the close of the service one
of the elders said to me, ' What a pity he cannot be
heard!' His utterance had not a single one of the
good qualities he had all his days fondly imagined it
to possess. He evidently had never known how to
drill himself, or been properly drilled by another.
xii I'KKKACK TO T1IIO TIUKI) KD1T10N.
Such cases l)( i .a.r witness on every hand that the risk
of self-deception is very great, and equally great the
importance of criticism by a capable and honest friend.
Not less instructive is this : ' Our friend/ said one with
pity and regret, ' has an unfortunate voice ' ; ' Nay/
said the other truly, 'but he has an unfortunate and
blarneable way of speaking, and till some months ago
was actually proud of it.' Such is the ignorance on
this subject, and such the proneness to blame nature,
ili at, in a meeting of professionally educated men dis-
cussing the merits of a candidate for office, one said he
evidently had cleft palate, when in fact he had only
the fault of mispronouncing r and s.
In the preface to the first edition I referred to the mis-
conception expressed in the phrase, ' a carrying voice/
My attention was recently recalled to this by one tell-
ing me that a certain person (a public speaker) had said
to him of me, ' He has a wonderful carrying voice/ I
could only reply, ' It no more carries than a rifle-bullet
does : it is driven.' I might have added, * and the
bullet has to be well formed, and the muzzle open.'
I have just returned from an important meeting of
some twelve hundred people, where I listened to six
able speakers. Three of them seemed to be heard
throughout by all, though with some difficulty by the
most distant ; the other three in different degrees, from
various faults of public speaking, were not completely
heard, and this often when both speaker and hearer
would most regret it. Yet these three had the best
vocal powers by nature and, except when thus imper-
fectly heard, were the most effective speakers.
PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION. xiii
In the searching revisal which the work has under-
gone for this edition, I have had the valuable assistance
(especially in Part II.) of a friend of my youth, the
Kev. George M' Arthur, M.A., who amid much import-
ant work has had the rare experience of having been
critical revising editor of the ' Encyclopaedia Britannica '
and the ' Century Dictionary.'
W. M.
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION.
THIS book is due to the persuasion of young men pre-
paring for the ministry, impressed with the importance
of good speaking, and unable to find such guidance
as they require. Their claim on me could not be
denied, after they had heard me say in addressing the
General Assembly that the preacher who is loyal will
spare no labour that will help to speed home the
message of his Master. ' He will even, if necessary,
undertake, at the feet of his Lord, the most puerile
drudgery to educate himself to speak every word and
sentence as it ought to be spoken true to the ear,
the intellect, the heart/ No other motive could have
led me to undertake this work.
It will be found, however, that such instruction as
the book aims at imparting is applicable to all speech
private as well as public. It covers the whole
ground from voice formation to platform and pulpit
speaking, and keeps constantly in view all that is
necessary for the student who may desire to educate
himself. The book takes its form in the prospect of
finding a place in the student's pocket.
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XV
The art of speaking can hardly be overestimated.
With the single exception of the power of thinking
itself which could scarcely be exercised without
language the human voice and the faculty of using
it in speech are the peculiar distinction and the highest
endowment of man. They are gifts also of singular
beauty and power. They have roused and repressed
every emotion, charmed unruly crowds, swayed strong-
minded senates, changed the history of nations. Even
the mechanism by which they are produced is a per-
petual wonder so strangely devised and complex, so
finely adjusted in its pares and adapted to its work.
Such faculties impose on us great responsibility, and
demand and deserve the highest honour and the best
treatment. Nor have we any possession that will
more frankly respond to and repay such treatment
by increase of beauty and power.
The English language may be difficult, but when
well spoken it is eminently beautiful and effective.
By those qualified to judge, it has often been said to
be unsurpassed among the modern languages of Europe.
The eminent philologist, Jacob Grimm, says, 'The
English language possesses a power which probably
never stood at the command of any other nation/
But it has been ' wounded in the house of its friends/
As Professor Hullah at greater length has said as
indeed all authorities have, and many of them in much
stronger language neither its vowels nor its con-
sonants nor its words get justice. Words are run
into one another; vowels lose their true sound and
substance, are curtailed, are slipped over ; and con-
sonants suffer from every kind of malformation, and
XVI PKIiFACE 10 THE FIKST EDITION.
every degree of imperfect utterance, down to being
completely inaudible. Except among the careless or
incapable, he will be a very rare student indeed who
does not soon discover that he has much to learn and
much to unlearn. Even the forming and using of the
voice itself require a great deal of attention ; and this
is not more a duty to the language, and desirable for
the sake of the hearer, than it is valuable for the
health and endurance of the vocal organs. Then, em-
bracing more things than those, there is the difference
between commonplace speaking and good speaking.
Professor Marcus Dods, having said that admirable
matter may be nullified by the speaking of it, adds,
'It is pitiable to think how much waste goes on weekly
in Scotland in this respect/ It is not confined to
Scotland.
The first demand upon a speaker is that the words
intended shall distinctly reach the ear of the hearer.
It may be noticed in conversation how greatly people
differ in this respect, and in public speaking faults
of ordinary speech are generally magnified. It is
instructive to observe how one or two of the men
on a platform make every word to be heard over
the whole house, while it is with difficulty that even
the gist of what is said by others can be gathered
by half the audience and this from no inferiority
of strength, general or vocal. And it is still more
interesting to see how a speaker will make himself
heard in the vigorous enforcement of his views against
opposition, but cannot be heard when reading a minute
or other dispassionate writing. It is not unusual to
hear such varieties accounted for by the easy remark.
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. xvii
* He has a clear voice/ or ' a carrying voice/ or ' a
thick voice/ or ' His tongue is too large for his mouth ! '
all having reference to what nature is supposed to
have done for the speaker; while in truth the dif-
ference is mainly due to what he has done or failed
to do for himself, and with hardly an exception the
most faulty of the speakers might with due pains have
been scarcely behind the best of them. Generally it is
not the natural gift that accounts for the results, but
the cultivation it has received and the use made of
it. The second demand next in importance to the
words being heard, and contributing to that end, is
that they shall have their true sound; that the
meaning and the feeling of the speaker shall have
their natural expression; and that the general effect
shall be pleasing to the ear as well as powerful on
the mind and heart. In relation to all such matters
it is hoped that the following pages may be helpful.
Excellence in speaking, as in other things, can be
attained only by hard and persistent labour in down-
right, outright earnest. And it must be well directed.
Of the many in our country to whom English is prac-
tically an acquired speech, not a few may be found
who, notwithstanding much pains, speak a pedantic
style which is all their own, and has not even the
merit of being spoken by them easily.
Two things a book cannot do. It cannot convince
a man against his will that he speaks faultily, or that
his voice in speaking may be improved though, if
he is willing to know the truth, it will help him even
to that discovery. But it is to be hoped that every
man, willing or unwilling, has a friend or two, faithful,
XV111 PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION.
instructed, and intelligent, who know faults of speech
and believe that they may be mastered, and who will
make an attempt to tell him the plain and complete
truth from the hearer's point of view. Yet, let it be
said in passing, something is far wrong when so much
cause exists for the hearer to teach the speaker. That
speaking should improve by experience need not be
said ; but what would be thought of the surgeon who
should have to learn from his patient how to handle
his tools, or of the tutor who should stand in need of
hints from his pupil? Again, neither book nor man
can have much success with the indolent, inaccurate,
easily satisfied who is without power of will, or does
not bring it to bear upon himself, and is without per-
severance. But all that a book with its own imper-
fections can do in helping young men to overcome
theirs, and to make the best of themselves, this book
honestly tries to do, and hopes to be received in the
friendly spirit in which it is offered.
Into physiological, scholastic, or theoretic questions
we go no farther than would seem to be of practical
interest to the intelligent student.
The best authorities have been consulted.
W. M.
CONTENTS.
PART
I.
VOICE-FORMATION .*
PAGE
1
II.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS
30
it
III.
WORDS
72
"
IV.
SENTENCES .
82
"
V.
PUBLIC SPEAKING .
110
n
VI.
THE PULPIT ....
. 130
,,
VII.
STAMMKIMNG.
. 105
INDEX .... . .181
SPEAKING.
PAET I.
VOICE- FOR MAT I ON.
THE lungs, the vocal cords in the larynx, with the aperture
between them called the glottis, the pharynx, the soft palate,
the walls of the mouth, the tongue, teeth, and lips are the
principal organs of speech, and the proper or improper use of
any one or more of them will appear in the speaking. Happily
they are all to a sufficient extent, directly or indirectly, under
our control. Notwithstanding the exhortation of some,
* Never mind how it is done, but do it,' there can be no
doubt that a certain amount of knowledge respecting the
organs is necessary. Without it the voice is cultivated at
great disadvantage, and the organs are at all times in danger
of injury from mistaken treatment. Such knowledge will
doubtless be welcome to every real student.
The moving power is wind from the lungs producing sound
by vibrating the vocal cords as it passes between them through
the glottis. The sound so generated is by the same power
driven through the mouth as through the tube of a trumpet,
where it receives the needful modelling to express every par-
A
2 SPEAKING.
tic alar word and tone. And the student must start with a
clear understanding that the utterance of one sound, or shade
of sound, after another, however swiftly, is possible only by
corresponding movements of the parts. If he will even in
his untutored state give attention to what takes place in his
mouth during the utterance of a few syllables he will discover
enough to convince him of this.
The manner of using the several organs will now be con-
sidered in their order.
THE LUNGS.
The wind-supply from the lungs is regulated by the muscles
of the chest, along with the natural elasticity of the lungs.
When the cavity of the chest is enlarged, air flows into
the lungs; when it is diminished, air is driven out. This
alternation of greater and less room is the work of muscles
whose ordinary action is independent of the will But
for public speaking we must, so to say, take the command ;
and on our government much depends both for voice and
health. In the respiratory movements of the chest an active
part is taken by the most flexible of its walls, that which
bounds it below, the midriff or diaphragm. 1
When speaking is to commence, the chest should be ex-
panded, and the upper part kept in this position as much as
1 The diaphragm is a muscular partition dividing the chest from the
abdomen. At rest it has the shape of a basin upside down, arching up
into the chest. For inhalation this convexity descends and flattens,
making more room above, and pressing out the abdomen. To verify
its motion we have only to sit down, or lie, and breathe as when asleep.
Its action suggests that of the piston of a pump. The motion is seen
in the flanks of an animal that has been running. When inhalation is
by descent of the diaphragm, the abdominal motion, as has been said,
is outward ; when by expanding the upper part of the chest, it is
inward.
VOICE-FORMATION. 3
possible. The lungs should be kept well furnished with air,
the supply being kept up mainly by the motion of the
diaphragm and ribs, and not of the more firm upper part of
the chest. The importance of a full chest is well illustrated
by comparing the eccentric performances of the bagpipes
when the wind-bag is in the process of filling with their
action when it is full.
Inhalation should be as much as possible through the
nostrils, 1 and should be noiseless and such that the audience
do not know the speaker is breathing. It should be made
when convenient, so as not to interfere with speech, and for
prospective as well as present need. To speak with the fag-
end of the breath must be avoided. It makes bad speaking,
and is most injurious to the organs. All these things should
be practised till they become a habit.
The capacity of the lungs may be much increased. To this
end and for obtaining easy control of the breathing it is good
exercise to inflate the lungs fully (through the nose, as
always), and after a little retention empty them (by the
mouth). Both actions should be done as silently as possible
and at every degree of speed from very slow to quick, and
done standing and walking, and also sitting and lying.
To get skill in breathing and strengthen the parts, read in
a strong loud whisper, also speak for minutes at a time in a
powerful impassioned voice, in both cases keeping a good
supply of breath with the least appearance of breathing.
Waste of breath must be guarded against. It is more
1 This is the natural way of breathing ; and men of science tell us that
it must at all times be the only way, if we would save the respiratory
organs from harm, or avoid drawing into the system impurities with
which the air is laden. It is an advantage to the throat in speaking.
During such inhalation either the front of the tongue touches the
palate, or its back part meets with the soft palate (p. 12), or the
lips are closed. It is probable there may not be many who in public
speaking adhere very closely to this mode of breathing.
1 SPEAKING.
common than is generally suspected impairing speech, and
stealing away the strength of the speaker. Breath emitted
either before or after the word or sound is wasted. For ex-
ample, in pronouncing 'who,' some are found to waste half
the expiration before reaching the word. So also the con-
clusion of words may be found followed by voiceless breath
like a light sigh. Let the lungs be charged, and let watch
be kept that the very beginning of the expiration begins the
sound of the vowel or consonant, and that the sound and the
expiration end together. Moreover, the sound itself must
be purely vocal, with no mixture of what may be called
' breathiness.'
But this is not all : correct voice-production is explosive by
a holding in of the breath momentarily before. This is a great
beauty in vocalising, and a source as much of ease and power
as of grace. However soft and feeble the tone of voice, it
should exhibit the same character of opening fulness. We
may have heard this called the explosive voice ; but it is
scarcely correct to speak of an excellence in speech as a
kind of voice. It has not the most distant relation to
attacking words with an emphatic or combative jerk, which
is a great vice. It is the secret of an easy, natural, pleasing
effectiveness which is everywhere admired, and of which
Mr Spurgeon was an eminent example. It is essential to
that most valuable art which we have called voice-propulsion
(p. 18).
The following exercises will aid in acquiring this habit oi
speech. Inhale a full breath and retain it for a little. Then
with open mouth forcibly, abruptly, briefly eject any one of
the vowel sounds as often as it can be done with the one in-
spiration care being taken not to show any movement of the
head or body, and to keep the chest up after each ejection.
In like manner take the other vowel sounds. For the next
VOICE-FORMATION. 5
stage do the same with all varying degrees of force. The
manner in which the effect is produced in the utterance of
consonants is noticed under Articulation (p. 18).
The student will find that the more pure and clear the
tone the less is the expenditure of breath. Let him charge
his lungs, and after a moment sound evenly and steadily any
of the vowels till the voice begins to waver, and then stop
and begin again. After a little practice, if he is giving the
sound purely, he should be able to continue it from five-
and-twenty to thirty seconds at an average pitch of note.
As will appear later, high notes can be maintained longer
than low. Another good exercise is to shut off this con-
tinuous sound completely and abruptly, and recommence it
in the same equable way without drawing breath, and to
make a number of such breaks during the expiration. It
will be observed that, as there is precisely the same lungful
of breath for this purpose as there was for the unbroken stream
of sound in the previous exercise, it should last as long.
The more completely to acquire control over the breath and
therefore the voice in speaking, and to strengthen the organs,
one exercise practised by the author was to run up a rising
ground till the breathing was quick and the chest heaved,
and then to speak in a loud voice as firmly and regularly as
possible. As this might be unsafe for some, it should be
begun cautiously by all.
Force or intensity of voice, it need hardly be said, depends
on the force of the current of air expressed ; and it is not to
be confused with pitch of voice, which depends on the vocal
cords.
THE VOCAL CORDS AND GLOTTIS.
The larynx is situated at the top of the windpipe, and
corresponds roughly to the prominence in the front of the
neck known as Adam's apple. The vocal cords are two
6 SPEAKING.
strong elastic bands on the inside of the larynx at its
narrowest part, which is about its middle. They start,
apparently touching each other, from a point in front, and
diverging, one to the right and the other to the left, they
together surround about two-thirds of it. They have an edge
free enough to vibrate for the production of sound. At their
starting-point they are fixed ; at their other end (towards the
back of the larynx) each is attached to a piece of gristle,
which is movable, so as to allow of their being tightened and
approximated, or relaxed and separated. The open space
between them is called the glottis. During a copious in-
spiration they are widely separated, giving to the glottis
a sort of oval shape with its length from front to back,
narrowest at the front. When at rest in ordinary breathing
they give to the glottis the shape of a long narrow triangle.
When called upon to produce sound they become parallel,
and, in proportion to the high pitch l of the note, closer
and more tense ; therefore also less air passes and the supply
lasts longer.
The tension of a string, and therefore the pitch of its note,
are heightened by drawing it out ; and the length of these
cords in repose is increased in the state of greatest ten-
sion and highest pitch by about a fourth of itself. Also
when strings are at the same tension the longest gives the
lowest note ; and so in different persons cords at the same
1 Those who are unacquainted with the subject may practically verify
what is meant by pitch when it is stated that to touch any key on the
keyboard of a piano produces a note higher in pitch than is given by
any key to the left hand of it, and lower than any to the right hand.
Or in the violin, to tighten a string, or to shorten it by placing the
finger on it, gives a note of higher pitch. The greater the number of
vibrations in a given time the higher the pitch. A greater or less
amount of force applied, as by the hand on the piano, or the bow on
the strings of the violin, produces more or less sound, but does not
nffect the pitch.
VOICE-FORMATION. 7
tension may give different notes because of difference in
natural length, not to speak of mass. With such exquisite
precision is muscular action adjusted, that within each semi-
tone of the scale an ordinary singer could produce ten distinct
intervals that is, ten different adjustments of the cords.
We cannot move them by an effort of the will ; but, what is
better, if we exert the will to produce a certain tone, the
corresponding muscular action takes place.
As was stated, there should be a momentary holding in of
the breath before giving voice. The vocal cords shut, close
the glottis, and take the degree of tension necessary for the
intended sound. Air accumulates below, and then, sud-
denly as when a trigger is pulled, rushes through between the
cords and throws them into rapid vibration. The pitch of
the voice depends on the number of these vibrations in a given
time. The best pitch for speaking will generally be about the
middle of the entire compass of the voice ; but in some voices
the higher notes, and in some the lower, require special culti-
vation. The speaking range need not ordinarily exceed six
notes, the extreme ones being much less frequently required
than the rest ; their training, however, is important.
The use of the vocal cords must be cultivated. We must
train ourselves to the production of voice at any pitch that
may be required, and of the finest variations of pitch in
single syllables and sounds called inflexion. A great deal
of practice for a time is absolutely necessary. And now,
/whoever is more concerned about his dignity than about
\the successful training of his voice had better accompany
us no farther : ithe exercises make such play with words
and tones as would delight a maniac,
The student must go where he believes that no person can
hear him, for he must be absolutely free from every degree
of restraint and reserve. He will practise at first on words
of one syllable one word at a time and then increase the
8 SPEAKING.
number of syllables any words : no, he, them, gay, run, lie,
fine, him, young, mean, flout, Iwili, how, cram, never, willing,
devise, attention, pleasantry, obedient. Charge the mind, and
charge the word full of meaning and feeling, so that the
meaning and feeling may be heard and felt more effectively
than if they were explained : affirmation, deprecation, sup-
plication, question, doubt, surprise, indignation, scorn, banter,
vexation, longing, &c. One who uses inflexion well in conver-
sation will mainly have to learn how to express it aloud in
public speech (p. 24). Those who inflect little and poorly
must in practice give sweeping, exaggerated, resistless ex-
pression to the feeling at first putting the magnifying-glass,
so to speak, on it. These exercises will be best practised
after the vowels and consonants are mastered, and the section
on Inflexion studied (p. 85).
Pitch and Power. The distinction between pitch of voice
and energy or force or power of voice is of essential im-
portance. A singer in a drawing-room gives every note at
exactly the same pitch as in a public hall, but the force is
vastly different. In speaking, care must be taken not to
substitute the one for the other, or let either interfere with
the other ; each must be determined on merits of its own.
The energy will depend on the urgency of the speaker or
on the distance of the hearer, or the like; and so far as it
depends on such reasons as distance it must of course be
maintained throughout and applied to every word of what-
ever pitch. This is very much overlooked, especially in the
conclusion of sentences or clauses. Many seem utterly re-
gardless, or ignorant, of the fact that it is the pitch and not
the force or audibleness that is to be lowered. Not only are
both pitch and force lowered by them, but frequently in the
pulpit the utterance is with the breathiness of a last gasp.
The pitch given to sentences, phrases, words, or the
VOICE-FORMATION. 9
beginning and ending of the same word, varies perpetually ;
for in speech every individual note is in transition, never
(as in music) sustained. This variation in its more pro-
nounced forms is known as inflexion, modulation, cadence,
of which more will be said (pp. 82-93). The general or
average pitch of a voice will differ somewhat in different
moods;* but, surprising as it may seem, the pitch (for the
same mood) in what we shall call the public voice, is the
same, even in very powerful speaking, as in conversation,
with few, if any, exceptions. The difference is in the force,
the power ; and happily this does not depend on general
strength of physique, or unusual strength of a part.
Very many who speak in public have not practised this
voice, though, apart from questions of hearing, nature itself
protests against a public assemblage being addressed in what
has only the character of a rather overpressed conversational
voice. The mistaken speaker imagines he is doing well, and
doing all he can ; and indeed he is put to more trouble than
he would be by using the proper voice. But he has no con-
ception (see p. 21) of the puny result. It is like waking
from a dream when he discovers the character and power of
the required voice, and his ability to produce it. What
should be done by him should be done by all, lest like him
they may unawares be mistaken. He should in practising
shout as one who raises the alarm of fire, with all possible
body or volume of voice, practising also less forceful degrees,
but never relapsing to the old way.
It is good exercise in pitch and force to strike notes on
an instrument, one at a time, and sound the voice in unison
with it, open-mouthed, full and clear, at various degrees of
strength, again and again.
It is good practice to speak amid a rival sound, as by the
surf when the sea is rough, striving to make the lightest
syllables audible.
10 SPEAKING.
The art of speaking being acquired, the frequent use of it
is required to keep the voice at its best, and the organs in
good condition. Some consider that public speaking (or
speaking as if in public) so seldom as once or twice a-week
is even dangerous. The speaker must keep 'in training'
like other workers. The feebler any tone is the more it
should be exercised suitably, and assuming that the parts
are in health.
Chest Voice. We are now in a position to understand
what cannot be meant, and what is meant, by 'chest voice.'
It cannot be a voice originating farther down, nearer to the
chest, than any other sound. For no sound originates either
below or above the vocal cords; every sound originates in
them and by their action. The phrase is sometimes used to
distinguish a natural from a falsetto voice, but generally is
an arbitrary expression applied to a greater or less number
of the lowest notes of the voice. It is a matter of pitch, as
that has been explained. A young speaker, who might be
named, was urged by his teacher to cultivate a chest voice, the
reason given being that his voice is high. So far well ; but
(1) his voice is not high, its dominant note in speaking
being F; (2) he has no conception of what is meant by
a chest voice; and consequently (3) he keeps endeavouring
to rake a sound out of his chest, to the serious injury of
the organs, if he continues. That voice was light and thin;
its need was not ' deepening ; (to lower notes) but more vol-
ume and resonance (p. 11).
The chest serves the purpose of a bellows only. The
common advice to ' speak from the chest/ should be speak
with a full chest, so that a firm, elastic, forceful stream may
play upon the cords ; and do not think to compensate for a
feeble stream by racking the parts about the throat.
The language to be met with on this subject bewilders the
VOICE-FORMATION. 1 1
inexpert. We are told by some that we have ' four voices
the upper head-voice, lower head- voice, upper ehest-voice, and
lower chest-voice ' ; by others, that we have five registers
the lower thick, upper thick, lower thin, upper thin, and
small. They divide the complete range of the voice into
sections according to slightly differing conditions assumed by
the cords at different points as the voice ascends or descends.
One authority tells us that 'the first requisite' is to dis-
tinguish the four voices; another, that they are often in-
distinguishable, and that where they are distinguishable the
aim should be to make them not so. And one thinks the
directions on the subject given by another ' rather amusing.'
We advise our readers not to trouble themselves about the
matter, but to believe they have one voice, and to practise
it up and down to do its best at every point, and never
to extort from it any tone by straining.
THE PHARYNX.
Next in order comes the pharynx, which plays an im-
portant part in the production of speech. It is a con-
tractile cavity lying between the larynx and the mouth, and
having openings to the lungs, stomach, mouth, nostrils, &c.
It has a considerable share in giving resonance l to the voice,
1 Resonance (re-sounding) may be defined in general terms as the
sound educed from one body by the sounding vibrations of another, as
from the table by placing on it the handle of a sounding pitch-fork,
. or without contact, as when a musical instrument in a room responds
to some accidental sound. The body of the violin gives resonance to
the string, and the body of any musical instrument to its primary
originating tone. So means of resonance are provided for the tones
struck by the vocal cords. Principally they are the mouth and pharynx,
but every part outward from the cords contributes, and even non-
contiguous structures. Between the mouth and the body of an in-
strument, however, there is the immeasurable distance between nature
12 SPEAKING.
and on its capacity depends in no small degree the volume
of voice, Its movements may be felt by the lingers outside.
It is in constant activity, for in high notes it is shortened
and contracted, and in low, elongated and enlarged. It aids
also, as we shall see (p. 54), in the explosive articulations
distending by the breath that is sent forward for compression
during the obstructive part of them, and contracting to aid
in the explosive part. Pharyngeal power may be increased,
if necessary, by the practice of such silent distensions, dwell-
ing on a vocal articulation as if in an attempt to continue
the sound of it (p. 54). It is the part principally affected in
so-called clergyman's sore throat, which is accompanied and
probably caused by faulty production of voice of a non-
natural and strained tone. A medical authority says he
has never seen this ailment in one who had the gift of
energetic extempore speech. The pharynx is generally the
seat of the feeling (when a feeling it is and not a fancy) that
leads to the glass of water in speaking. The use of this does
harm rather than good, and those who have been persuaded
to leave it off have found it was only a bad habit.
The throat, in the ordinary use of the word, means the
parts at the back of the mouth, including the pharynx and
soft palate. All constriction or narrowing of the throat spoils
the speech. It should in speaking be kept open, easy, free.
THE SOFT PALATE.
As there will by-and-by be occasion to refer to { the
and art. The mouth having to form all the vowel sounds, each with
its resonance, is in perpetual change. To improve resonance: with
easy throat, open mouth, and full lungs, speak much aloud and strongly,
do justice to vowels, speak heartily, with the feeling that is in the
passage, and follow generally this manual. The open-mouthed, open-
throated street crier sending his voice afar becomes eminently resouaut.
VOICE-FORMATION. 1 3
palate/ let this distinction be noted : the palate is the roof
of the mouth, the soft palate is a membranous curtain de-
pendent from the back part of it, and having the uvula, or
' pap of the throat,' hanging from its edge. The effects of it
on speech are very important. By the descent of the curtain
and the rising of the back part of the tongue to meet it, the
air and voice are shut off from the mouth and sent through,
or into, the nose. On the other hand, when the curtain is
drawn fully up it closes the way into the nose, and the air
and voice pass through the mouth free and clear. The more
nearly that the curtain and tongue approach each other, the
greater will be the degree of nasal sound in the voice.
It is not thus that the so-called nasal sound which we are
accustomed to associate with American speech is produced.
It does not pass through the nose. Indeed some are of
opinion that in its origin it was a result of the frequency
of catarrh al affections of the nostrils in New England and
near the Great Lakes. Like some peculiarities observable at
home, it stands in the way of better qualities of speech.
In the English language the only nasal sounds are m, n, ng,
and they are truly so. To give this character to other sounds
is a fault of speech. In a vowel the slightest nasal quality
is a barbarism. In some people the whole of the speech
has more or less of this fault often from sheer slovenly
indolence. It has been said that there are buildings in
which nasal speech is better heard ; but nothing could be
more easily or completely refuted. If the same person who
uses the peculiarity will set it aside and speak correctly with
the same force and pitch, our case will be proved. There
need be no doubt that he who is heard through his nose is
heard in spite of his nose. The descent of the uvula into the
vocal current produces some degree of guttural tone.
The student with his back to the light can easily see those
parts in a hand-mirror. If he makes a strong, copious,
14 SPEAKING.
noiseless inhalation by the mouth, he will see that the middle
of the tongue is depressed, and the curtain rises fully up.
He should try to retain it as high as possible while he utters
vowel sounds, beginning with, and dwelling on, such as ah
and atv, in the utterance of which its position can be seen.
For other sounds its position is higher changing with every
vowel but, though higher, it can scarcely, if at all, be seen,
because part of the tongue in front of it must rise more or
less to produce these sounds.
It is easy to test whether the speech is free from nasal
quality by completely plugging the nostrils. If the speech
is sound, the plugging does not make the slightest differ-
ence in it, except in words where m and n occur. These
articulations demand open nostrils. To overcome a tendency
to nasal speech, it is good to speak sharply and forcefully
with set purpose to drive the sound through the mouth. But
where the habit is inveterate, and above all where it affects
the whole of the speech, special treatment will be necessary;
that, indeed, will be valuable in any degree of this blemish.
The student should plug his nostrils and speak at every
degree of pitch and force, omitting words with m or n.
This makes speaking through the nose impossible, and should
also keep the soft palate up to make way for the whole of
the breath passing through the mouth. By such study and
practice he should be able to overcome the habit. He may,
of course, knock his breath against the plug, especially at
first, and still produce unsound voicing, but we assume he
will not allow himself to do this.
THE MOUTH.
Bringing its pitch with it from the vibrations of the vocal
cords, the voice receives from the rest of the organs, and
almost wholly the mouth, its body, form, and quality
VOICE-FORMATION. 1 5
(timbre). 1 With every different formation given to its
course outward from the glottis hy the position in which we
place the tongue, cheeks, lips, &c., a change of sound is
produced. While the form of the fixed parts of the organs
differs in different cases, the movable parts adapt themselves
so as to produce the same sound.
The slightest change in the mouth tells. The pitch and
force of the sound may be the same and the vowel correctly
given, but the quality and effect are different. It is thus
that the mouth becomes the instrument and vehicle of every
shade of feeling, and the interpreter of the most delicate
touches of meaning. And it is thus that many faulty pecu-
liarities of speech are produced. Care must be taken to keep
the mouth sufficiently open.
Most people injure their speech by insufficient opening of
the mouth, and also (if they attend to the matter at all)
imagine themselves to open it more widely than they do. In
good speaking the teeth are, as they should be, at least half
an inch apart for any vowel sound. One who has not given
attention to the subject may think this impracticable for
him ; but it is easily put to the proof. Aid the unpractised
mouth by placing something between the jaws where it will
least interfere with the tongue or breath say, at the sides.
It will thus be found that none of our sounds require the
mouth to be closer than we have said, save only during the
momentary contacts required in the production of P and its
kindred, and F and V (pp. 56, 63).
The only way of opening the mouth is by bringing down
the lower jaw. If one cannot do this as naturally and easily
for speech as for other purposes, he must learn. Without
1 Quality is the individual character of tone which distinguishes be-
tween tones, though they be of the same pitch and power, as between
those of a flute and a violin, or two violins, or an instrument and a
voice, or two voices. Resonance contributes largely to quality.
16 SPEAKING.
openness of mouth, back and front (see throat, p. 12), it is
not possible to get volume, clearness, and smoothness of
voice. To prevent self-deception as to the degree of open-
ness, the mirror will have to be used for some time. Open
squarely, not with a narrow stretch downwards.
Most faults of speech are connected with this part of the
vocal mechanism. Many of them fall to be considered in
treating of the vowels and consonants ; others are general,
affecting all sounds. Of these many are obvious, and not
confined to public speaking. One uses the mouth as if it
were a cavern, another as if it were a squirt, instead of a
speaking-trumpet. One draws the hearer's attention to the
back of his mouth, another to the front. One speaks as if
everything about his mouth were too tight, another as if
everything were too loose. Then we have what may be called
inflated cheek mouthing of which there are many sorts, all
of them hindrances to hearing as well as faults of speech.
One is well forward in the mouth, c pompous, pompo, pomp,
po ' ; another is farther back and gives the impression of
pride and imperiousness ; and a third may be added which is
neither, but would lead the simple-minded to suppose that
the thoughts of the speaker are so exceeding great as to
keep organs apart that ought to have constant momentary
contacts. Then comes the young gentleman proud of his
fine tones, and thinking to enhance their charm by slurring
over as many of his consonants as possible. Again, by
causing the vocal stream to impinge where it ought not, every
variety of fault is produced : it may be a sort of hard metallic
ring which destroys every element of sympathy in the voice,
and is even provocative ; or it may be the sound of a saw at
work, incisive enough, but carrying neither conviction nor
pleasure ; or the stringy wiriness of a well-worn piano ; or
the depressing tones of the forlorn.
VOICE-FORMATION. 1 7
THE TONGUE.
Let the student observe in the mirror how his tongue may
be moved, arid he will almost shiver to see how it swells and
shrinks, goes forth and back, rears itself and cowers, and
creeps and wriggles, like an independent living thing.
He will then be ready to believe the fact that by a little
practice the most lumbering, awkward tongue may be drilled
into executing with deftness the most subtle and complicated
articulations, and the most delicate shades of sound. It must
be kept free of contact with the bed of the jaw. In describ-
ing the action of the tongue in the formation of sounds it is
better to avoid saying ' the point of the tongue/ because it
has no point unless when stretched out.
THE TEETH.
The teeth materially aifect the quality of the voice by the
degree in which they are kept open. When they are close
it is obvious they must impede and deform the vocal current.
It suffers both in power and purity, and in resonance and
freedom, and has a trill imparted to it from vibration in the
teeth. They cannot always be at the same degree of open-
ness, but should always be as open as possible, and at the
least half an inch for any vowel sound. The teeth render
essential service in the pronunciation of certain consonants,
as will be seen under that branch of our subject.
THE LIPS.
The lips also, besides their general influence on the tone
of the voice, render similar special services which will come
under consideration in due course. Meanwhile let warn-
ing be taken against such faults as pursing or projection
B
18 SPEAKING.
of the lips, or stitching them together, so to speak, at either
corner or at both. Keeping easily and naturally around
the range of the teeth, they should without receiving any
attention move in a vertical direction only, except in facial
gesture (p. 125).
It is scarcely credible, but it is true, that a very recent
publication prescribes for four of the vowel sounds that the
lips shall protrude being also for one of them wrinkled ;
for a fifth, in a large circle ; and for another, in a very
small circle. It is easy to imagine what an exhibition this
would make in speaking, and what would be the effect on
observers. That writer might easily have proved to himself
that, so far from such movements being required, the sounds
are all more purely rendered without them. They would,
moreover, render it impossible to use the lips for their natural
and important service of expression. A lip may require
drilling into sufficient flexibility.
VOICE-PROPULSION.
The voice must be shot clear of the mouth, fully propelled
forth from it as a discharged projectile. The explosive
quality of voice (p. 4) is essential for this. Failure is
very common. Words are formed in the mouth, are of
course well heard by the speaker, and are then left to
themselves as if all his duty towards them was over, not to
speak of their exit being often positively hindered by an
insufficiently open mouth or some other oral habit. The
best that can be said is that they make their own escape
from the mouth, and are caught by those who are near
enough or alert enough. Attentive observation of the next
dozen speakers will prove the importance of what we say.
Louder speaking may at the best in some cases supply in
a small measure the place of correct method, but much
VOICE-FORMATION. 1 9
oftener (and in certain circumstances always) it aggravates
the evil. The student should practise the projecting of
sounds, words, and phrases, avoiding jerkiness and snappi-
ness and all jerky motions of the body, and should imagine
them directed against a target at various distances. For
the successful use of words in this practice good articulation
is essential.
ARTICULATION.
All articulations are produced by some action of the
organs which more or less obstructs and compresses the
breath or voice, and then releases it with percussive effect.
The various articulations are denoted by the consonants, the
proper pronunciation of which is of inestimable value to the
speaker. It is essential to distinctness, ease, and effective-
ness. There is immense power in articulation. Let us
explain it and the manner in which it is effected. Take the
two consonants p and b, in which the obstructive part of the
pronunciation is so simple as to be merely the closing of the
lips. If in pronouncing such words as trip, rib, we conclude
with the closing of the lips, the effect of those consonants is
merely to cut off sound ; and if we endeavour thus to dwell
on them, we only prolong the silence. But this is not their
purpose. They denote audible articulations ; and they claim
not only the shutting of the lips but the separating of them,
and that with a distinctly audible, quick, percussive escape
of breath. All the articulations must be mastered (pp.
47-71).
The obstruction and compression of the breath required
for an articulation take place in the mouth, and the com-
pressed breath is between the point of obstruction and the
glottis that is, in the mouth and pharynx (p. 11), both of
which are contractile or elastic. The breath sent forward
into the mouth should, when obstructed, distend the pharynx
20 SPEAKING.
more or less (as may be felt by the hand outside) according
to the degree of obstruction and force ; and the way of
separating the obstructing organs along with the co-operating
contraction of the pharynx causes the percussive ejection of
the air and audibility of the articulation. At the instant of
that separation the stream must be cut off from the lungs by
preventing the chest from contracting. It is a common error
to neglect the explosive parting of the articulating organs ;
and what then occurs is that the flow from the lungs
continues, passing aimlessly and wastefully out when the
separation takes place. If listened for, it can be heard like
a soft sigh or a prolonged 7?,. Where this injurious habit
exists, the louder the speaking, and the more gusty the
final syllables, the greater the evil ; and it is evident that
the number of words ending in consonants must make the
accumulated effect very fatiguing, while the real cause of the
fatigue has been unsuspected. Besides, without the explo-
sive finish there are many syllables and words which can
scarcely be distinguished from each other, for example, op,
at, dk ; hid, hit ; beg, leek; fear, feared ; whole, hold; robe,
rope. The pronunciation of the different consonants is
treated of later, as is also articulation in continuous speech.
In the General Assembly of 1898 a speech delivered by
the Archbishop of Canterbury on Temperance was a fine
illustration of open-mouthed speaking and of voice -pro-
pulsion and articulation. A man of seventy-six years, he
spoke naturally and with ease, and every syllable and tone
was heard in every corner of the hall.
Smooth or easy delivery of speech does not lie in glid-
ing over vowels and consonants, but in acquired facility of
uttering them, and uttering them correctly.
VOICE-FORMATION. 2 1
SELF-DECEPTION.
To hear ourselves as others hear us seems no easier than
4 to see ourselves as others see us ' ; and this is a preliminary
difficulty in learning to speak. One is quite surprised to
be told that he speaks \vith a manifest ' burr ' (p. 48), and
resolves to get over it ; yet a year later he is equally sur-
prised to be told that it is just the same as ever. One
occasionally ascends to an absurd falsetto, unconscious of
the effect, and is pleased to have been told that he is gifted
with two voices. One imagines he has got the English
sound of the name of a poet, t Capo ' (apparently Italian) ; but
spelling has to be resorted to before it occurs to any of his
auditors that he speaks of Cowper. Another is unaware
that he says Lord like curd ; another that he says yis for
yes, and so in other words ; another that his vowels in men
and mane are scarcely distinguishable, and both wrong. An-
other is amazed to hear that his letter s is never heard by
his audience, and so little does he realise the effect that
long time and much insistence scarcely overcome the defect.
Another pronounces syllables like first and verse, frst and
vrse ; and, after more than time enough, not only remains
where he was, but actually fancies he is erring on the other
side. Another imagines he says ' psalm ' when he prolongs
a little the name of Sam. Some can hardly be persuaded
that they skip a great many small words and syllables.
Some are monotonous as a pendulum, yet believe they
modulate finely. Some imagine they give the ends of their
sentences impressively, though repeatedly told that they end
them inaudibly. It is strange that any official in an emin-
ent position should be so unaware of facts as not to know
that half his audience are indignant that he should, as they
think, consider it beneath his dignity, or disturbing to his
tine tones, to speak so as to be heard by them ; or that an-
22 SPEAKING.
other should dream that he is being heard, when in equal
displeasure they are denouncing his failure as due to sheer in-
dolence. At least one friend has told them, but it seems
easier for them to believe that they are doing well enough.
It is almost as strange that one should imagine he makes
his voice carry and grip by the tones of the corn-crake while
he does neither, but earns the reputation of a harsh voice.
One speaks with half-open mouth, makes s nasal, blunders
certain consonant combinations, reduces all last words to a
minimum of time and sound, vainly labours to be heard, in-
excusably fatigues himself, and then, with the simplicity of
a child, asks only, ' Did you notice any provincialisms 1 '
Such facts fill with despair any one who desires to be-
friend. They are mentioned here to stimulate attention to
the universal need of guarding against self-deception. No
doubt it contributes to this deception that one hears his own
voice to a large extent from within, transmitted through
bone and other solids, while others hear it, after it has
passed out, by transmission through air. 1 This explains the
usefulness of a little device by which the student may make
himself better acquainted with his voice as heard by others,
and which he may find it good to use frequently in the
1 It is easy to verify the striking difference in the effect of the two
methods. Tie the middle of a string round the head of the poker, and
dangle it against something hard : the result is heard through the air.
Then take the wings of the string, one in each hand, and wind them
once or twice round a finger at the point, put the fingers in the ears
(stopping them), and dangle again. Even if the string is wound on the
back part of the finger, the effect is much the same ; or, if instead of
putting the finger in the ear, it is made to press the small gristly pro-
tuberance between the cheek and the ear so as to make it shut the
ear like a lid. Or, take a wooden pin into the teeth at one end and
(giving necessary support, interfering as little as possible with vibra-
tion) dangle the poker from the other end. By such means the in-
telligent student will learn that others do not hear his voice as he
does. It is a surprising and charming experiment.
VOICE-FORMATION. 2 3
process of his education, as in getting at the true character
of his sounds compared with each other and with the sounds
of others, and in judging nice variations of them : place the
fingers close together with the thumb close -to the hand, and
curve the hand as if to lave water ; put one hand (curve
forward) behind the edge of each ear, and turn the ear
and hand well to the front so that together they shall make
a large close collecting surface to catch the sound ; or, if
need be, try even some less natural, if more effective con-
trivance to enlarge the surface.
1 Was I heard 1 ' One might suppose there could be little
risk of harm in the answer to this. Yet even here the
amount of deceiving and being deceived is incredible. A
year ago the author, having worshipped in an historic church,
afterwards in the vestry heard the preacher ask an elderly
minister if he had been heard. * Oh yes, you were heard,'
was the ready response. A few weeks later, in the same
place, another preacher put the question to a young man, and
received the same reply. Perhaps those comforting but un-
warranted answers were intended to mean no more than that
the preachers were ' heard ' by some ! or were ' heard ' to be
speaking ! We need not speculate. The lesson for our
readers is that they cannot too carefully guard themselves
against deception, conscious or unconscious, by themselves or
others. For most hearers there is a good deal to be said if
their answer is misleading. They may have come to believe
that complete audibility is not to be expected. They may
erroneously imagine they heard correctly what the speaker
intended, though they did not, as when a passing reference
to the importance of ' health ' was understood to be a reminder
of the importance of ' hell.' We cannot pass from this with-
out insisting that it is not enough to be merely heard. The
speaker should be well heard his words reaching the hearer
not with the last expiring movement of a spent ball, but with
24 SPEAKING.
some degree of impact ; and he should remember that people
like to hear, and are entitled to hear, and may be much
misled if they do not hear, every word.
NATURALNESS.
What is it to be natural? It must not for a moment be
supposed that to follow one's own familiar way, whatever its
peculiarities, is to be natural. These peculiarities may have
grown with his growth and strengthened with his strength
and be as a part of him, but if any of them are unnatural
this will not make them natural. The cheap and unex-
plained counsel, ' Be yourself,' is presumably to the same
effect as * Be natural ' ; and surely, though its meaning is
left obscure, it cannot be intended to say, * Be this creature
of provincialisms and family isms and unnaturalisnis.' To
say of anything which is unnatural in a speaker, that it
4 has become natural to 1dm} is a misuse of words. It has
indeed become inveterate habit, and he has got into the way
of associating with it some mood of thought or feeling which
is not associated with it by nature ; but that does not make
it natural either in him or in any other. It is not the pro-
duct of nature, and it does not speak with nature's voice.
To be natural is to speak in that tone and manner which
nature itself has appointed for the expression of every
several mood. It is the same for every people and tongue.
One may speak in an unknown tongue, but if he speaks
naturally, the hearer can tell whether it is in anger or pity,
in joy or sorrow or dread ; whether he is commanding or
entreating or exhorting ; whether he is praying or instruct-
ing. What can be more unnatural, for example, than when
one attempts to persuade in the tone of command ; or when
speaking on a joyful subject and exhorting to rejoice he fills
his voice with tremolo and tears ; or when in prayer he
VOICE-FORMATION. 25
gabbles and hops along without a suggestion of reverence ; or
when he would be solemn he only mouths, or croaks, or is
heavy and oppressive ; or when intending to speak a word
with distinctness he speaks it instead with emphasis ?
But if nature does not make a man speak naturally, can
anything be done for him? Yes; at one time he always
spoke quite naturally, and even now for the most part speaks
naturally in private : and these experiences may be used to
restore and extend right relations between him and nature.
When he was a child his speaking was perfectly natural, as
well as his laughing and his crying. It is an important and
instructive fact that all little children speak naturally, and it
is greatly to be regretted that anything should interfere with
this as they grow up. Much may be learnt by carefully
listening to them before their speech is spoiled ; but enough
of nature remains in homely conversation on which to found
the process of making public speech natural.
It is matter of common observation that men may speak
quite naturally in a conversational tone and be painfully un-
natural when they must speak or read in a loud voice. For
illustration, take the last chapter of the Gospel according to
Luke, with its innumerable shades of emotion and its nine
questions almost all differing in interrogatory tone. It
is probable that any person of intelligence (who does not
mouth, or hum and haw, or simper in superfine manners, or
do other silly things), having occasion in conversation to
speak for himself the counterpart of anything in the pas-
sage, would speak it quite naturally, and would also make
the transitions from one part to another quite easily ; yet
many intelligent persons when called on to read this piece
in a loud voice make havoc of the whole. We have heard,
for example, some of its questions put in the manner of a
slave-driver, and in verse 25 the word of Christ, ' fools/
&c., given in a tone which shocked the hearer as if it had
26 SPEAKING.
been the word so severely condemned in the Sermon on the
Mount. Again, how few pronounce the Benediction so as
to be heard over a large place, because most have not ac-
quired the art of giving the appropriate tone in a loud voice !
Is it the trouble of learning to speak naturally, and the
rareness of it, that account for the tendency in pulpits and
reading-desks to adopt a senseless formulated sing-song?
Assuming that the student can speak naturally in conversa-
tion, let him take any expression in few words, or a single
word question (of inquiry, doubt, argument, &c.), answer,
statement, ejaculation, entreaty, appeal, remonstrance, en-
couragement, congratulation, condolence, disapproval, tender-
ness, severity, solemnity, reverence, wonder, hope, fear,
sarcasm anything, everything, in every mood one thing
at a time, and not (for a while at least] culled from a book
as something high and fine but the more truly everyday
and impromptu the better ; let him see that he speaks it
appropriately in conversational tones ; then raise his voice
a little, and repeat the expression carefully after the same
formula ; when he has got full possession of this, let the
voice be raised a little more ; and so on, repeating the pro-
cess till by degrees he reaches his loudest coming back
constantly to test the utterance by comparison with what
must be presumed to be its natural form in conversation.
Thereafter, give it at all different degrees of loudness, not
proceeding in the order of the degrees, but at random. Treat
another expression in the same way, and then speak two or
more of them together at every degree of loudness.
If a person would be natural, he is almost sure to find some
peculiarities to be overcome perhaps arising even from what,
for example, is imagined to be a good style of cadence or
modulation. We heard a reader say, 'and he closed the
book . . . and sat down,' with solemn emphasis on l down,' a&
if to point out that it was not ' up,' and to impress every one
VOICE-FORMATION. 2 7
with the gravity of that fact. Again we hear, * I will call
upon Thee/ with the supreme emphasis upon ' -on. 7 In most
cases the emphasis is likely to be on 'Thee,' and in every
case it is certain that ' call upon ' is a single phrase (p. 94).
For this, and indeed for everything that stands in the way of
naturalness, there is wanted, in practising, the constant and
severe application of common-sense.
Unnaturalisms in speech may strike and impress the un-
lettered at first, but so soon as they become familiar their
power is gone. Natural speaking never loses its power.
Both in reading and speaking, the spirit in which anything
ought to be uttered should be considered beforehand.
THE SECRET.
Practice, practice, practice, daily practice, persevering
practice of details, like the girl at her piano, like the ap-
prentice at his tools this is the secret. He who would
produce good work in reading or speaking must get first the .
correct and perfectly easy mastery and use of the tools \
the vocal organs, the vowels, consonants, and syllables ; and
this can be got only by determined, persevering practice of
elementary details. To acquire only intellectual knowledge
of them and their work is useless : they must be practised
and with exaggeration at first till their correct use is
second nature. This practice of the tools is not to be gone
through in imagination, nor in whispers or mumblings,
but strongly as they shall be wanted for work. To attempt
to recite for practice without such apprenticeship is labour
wasted rather, we should say, time wasted ; for little is
the labour that the pupil will bestow on it. He finds it
so profitless that he soon regards the proceedings with in-
difference. Take the piano or violin. Who would dream of
putting down a piece from the great masters to a beginner'?
28 SPEAKING.
The pupil must first master the scales, the use of the fingers,
the execution of phrases, the production of effects, and
the like ; and thereafter most will depend on his own
natural capacity and his enthusiasm. The practice of which
we speak must be taken up heartily, and will require at least
months of mere apprenticeship. It must be persevered in
day and night : on the highways and by-ways and hill-tops,
the pupil as he goes giving forth his vowels, consonants,
words, and phrases ; conducting imaginary conversations,
sense or nonsense, on any subject the weather itself would
give abundant scope for every form of utterance and every
shade of tone and inflexion. Almost any single short sen-
tence would. If shut into a city, let him find some spacious
shelter where he will be safe from the fear of man. But
however or wherever it be, there must be this indefatigable,
open-mouthed practice till the fools, pliable and agile ami in
perfect wmmand, at the least hint from the will, or on the
motion of an instinct swifter than will, produce almost auto-
matically any effect of speech that is wanted. We do not
know of failures from any cause but senseless, perfunctory,
short-lived practice. A royal road was wanted, and there is
none.
EXCUSES.
When one has his attention directed to a fault of speech
we seriously advise him not to begin (as seems universal) to
make excuses, for those who know the subject will laugh at
him and his excuses as soon as they are at liberty. One
of the notable things is the unanimity with which faulty
speakers attribute all to exceptional present circumstances,
and never seem to dream that they have got an obvious
habit. We further counsel one to whom a fault has been
pointed out, not to go canvassing others in hope of hearing
a contrary opinion. Nothing is easier than to get that. It
VOICE-FORMATION. 29
should always be remembered, too, that, for many and
various reasons, if only one man in a hundred will mention
a fault at all to a speaker, there is not one in a thousand
but will understate it. And it must be said for almost all
hearers that their standard is generally no higher than is to
be got from the very class who are inviting their judgment.
Even in the simple matter of audibility it is wonderful what
ground may be got on which to found excuses (p. 23).
Some are excused on the supposition that the obstacles
with which they have to contend are very great, if not in-
superable. The author has no personal knowledge of serious
malformation, but has met with such cases as the follow-
ing. It once fell to him to teach a lad that stammered, who
in excuse stutteringly named several progenitors who had
done the same. ' If that be so,' was the reply, ' it is time
it were stopped ' ; and in not many days it was stopped.
Years after, teacher and pupil met, and he said in his original
unhappy manner, * After you I got a stupid fellow of a tutor
and he let me fall into it again.' A pupil- teacher, instead of
the letter s wherever it occurred, sent a sound through his
nose without an atom of sibilance inimitable, indescribable,
ugly, and making it very difficult to follow him. The
doctor pronounced it (inferentially, it is to be supposed) an
organic defect and hopeless ; the chairman of the managers
knew his father, and pronounced it hereditary and hopeless
the teacher took no trouble. The lad, being called to atten-
tion, was decisively bidden to say ' yeS,' and he said it, de-
molishing in a moment all exculpatory theories. Yet the
ridiculous habit was continued till the school inspector told
him, if he could not speak on next occasion, he would be
rejected. So absurdly unwilling are some people to face a
little trouble in getting rid of what hinders, or even befools
them, that he wept over this like a child. But within a
couple of months he spoke s faultlessly. Lastly, an able
29a SPEAKING.
young man with university honours was declared by his
teachei in elocution to be hopeless. His voice flat and
thick, his manner of speech monotonously dull and intensely
provincial, he could not be improved. Under such a verdict
he was heartless also and diffident. He was then started
anew with a few lessons on the right lines, and on
these lines he went on himself, and speaks well. These
typical cases are for the encouragement of those who may
think themselves beyond remedy But it must be repeated
that those who see little or no need or will not take
trouble, are the only classes of whom there is no hope. A
youth who had acquired a superfine set of vowels and con-
sonants was told that he could not possibly get the first step
up in his profession without a revolution in his speech. He
answered dolefully, c That is a bad look-out ' as if such a
revolution was not to be thought of. He remains what he
was, and therefore where he was.
Has the student taken thought of the power there is in
resolute will and practice, and of the obligation which is
upon him to give effect to both ? He has only to look
round on the innumerable industries, not to say also the
public entertainments, of the land, and to compare the work
of one who has acquired his art with what the same worker
could do when he began his practice, or even was well
advanced in it. In the matter of speaking, in his own case
alone, let him think how it changed between the age of
three and thirteen, or three and twenty-three. No doubt it
may have in some respects deteriorated, notably in natural-
ness ; but whether for better or for worse, it is a witness to
the effect of practice, and that, too, at a period when the
motives and power of will that backed it were weaker than
now. The improvement which well-directed, resolute prac-
tice produces in speaking is scarcely credible. But many
of some promise, like children with their toys, as soon as
VOICE-FORMATION. 29fc
the novelty is off become indifferent ; and with nothing good
attained, and a few things half attained, the effect is only to
show that they once made some attempt and failed. If the
student intends a profession in which public speaking is
important, the example of long-continued effort devoted to
other occupations has a lesson not only as to the power of
practice but the duty of practising. Henry Ward Beecher
says he was drilled incessantly for three years. Randolph
of Roanoke, though he began with a disagreeable creaking
voice, became a most fascinating speaker. A long list
might be given of eminent speakers who are known to have
attained the power by sheer, determined, laborious, pains-
taking self-disciplina
30
PAET II.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS.
MEMORANDA ON VOWEL SOUNDS.
1. THE possible number of vowel sounds is limited only by
the power of the human voice. Even the actual sounds of
a single language scarcely admit of being numbered. There
are variations so minute that, while some may give them a
place and notation, others do not acknowledge them as prac-
tically distinct sounds, and some may not have the faculty
of apprehending them at all.
2. It is so in English. And even when the difference of
sound is by no means delicate, there are evident difficulties
connected with notation. There is first the impossibility at
times of finding a sample word which all pronounce exactly
alike ; next, we have different authorities using different
sample words, and it cannot be told whether they are striv-
ing to represent the same sound, or whether they have differ
ent opinions of the sound to be represented. It is not sur-
prising, therefore, to find that the number of vowel sounds
given by six of the most recent dictionaries of repute is as
follows : 15, 17, 21, 31, 31, 61 ; and two other authori-
ties now lying before the writer give 14 and 16. Further,
even those who come nearest to each other do not always
make up their lists with the same sounds ; and further still,
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 31
they not infrequently assign different known sounda for tho
pronunciation of the same word. The student will under-
stand, however, that there is a wide range within which
educated opinion is agreed, and a great store of work remains
for him.
3. The letters of the alphabet which represent the vowel
sounds are only six in number a, e, i, o, u, y. The two
sounds which y represents are also represented by i. Each
of the vowel letters stands for more than one sound ; while
on the other hand the same sound is represented in more
ways than one e.g., none and nun have the same sound,
you and ewe, fane and feign; and again two combine to
represent a sound, as in out, oil.
4. Many classifications of the vowel sounds have been
proposed, but the result is unsatisfactory, confusing to all
but experts, and of no practical use. Even the simplest,
long and short, is misleading and constantly misapplied.
For example, note is not the long of not, nor seek of sick, nor
wile of mil, nor main of men, nor psalm of Sam, but the
two sounds differ in character. At best, long and short is
only a scholastic distinction, for a good speaker will lengthen
and shorten as required. No one would give the same
length to 'there' in the sentences, 'There are some/ and
'He was not there.' The a in are is quite as often short as
long. Pull and pool are short and long, but there might
easily be occasion to prolong pull.
Discarding all questions of classification, the student
should set himself to get correctly the essential character of
each of the vowel sounds by itself.
5. As has already appeared indirectly (p. 14), vowel
sounds are produced in the mouth by different arrangements
of its parts. Chief of these are the positions of the tongue.
The several formations now fall to be described as briefly
and accurately as possible. It will be found the best
C
32 SPEAKING.
course to take the sounds in two sets, as in the subjoined
list, in the order in which the formations most closely ap-
proximate to each other. These should be seen in the mirror,
as far as possible.
6. The sounds in the list are necessary for a sufficient
equipment, and the student must acquire the power and
habit of enunciating them with accuracy and perfect ease.
In this study he must be far from assuming that the sample
words as pronounced by him, or in his part of the country,
give the correct sound, but must test himself by the account
given of it. We have attached more such words than one
to a sound, the better to guard against error, and also that
the student may observe the identity of the sound in differ-
ent settings.
7. In practising any sound it must be dwelt on decisively,
to make sure that the true sound has been caught ; and
when caught it must be dwelt on and repeated to produce
familiarity and certainty.
8. In relation to distinctness of speech we hear the
counsel, l Look after the consonants ; the vowels will look
after themselves/ This is not too strong as to consonants,
but ruinous as to vowels. When a vowel sound begins or
ends a word, it has practically the effect of a consonant, and
wherever it occurs its clearness and purity are of the utmost
consequence in identifying the word. Besides, to give
every vowel sound true and distinct and full and sweet adds
a charm to speech, not to mention the part which vowels
have in expressing emotion. Mr Gladstone counselled
attention to the vowel sounds. Even when they have to be
given lightly and briefly they must be given correctly and
distinctly.
9. ' Other symbols ' throughout this Part do not include
such as are peculiar to a small number of words.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS, 33
e as in eel, he, eve, weak, teem, p. 34. See under R p. 50.
i M ill, hilt, with, limp, sing, p. 35. n n 50.
e it ell, let, fled, them, peg, p. 36. .. n 50.
a ii ale, fate, way, gain, lade, p. 37. u n 50.
a u am, sad, tax, lamp, ask, p. 39.
a n ah, far, balm, heart, halve, p. 39. n M 52.
i n isle, life, fine, by, sight, p. 40. n 52.
u M ooze, pull, rude, moon, shoe, p. 41. u M 50.
u ii use, new, tune, few, due, p. 42. n n 50.
ti off, or, from, dog, got, p. 42.
01 n oil, boy, void, joy, noise, p. 44. M n 52.
o M oh, note, road, tone, woe, p. 44. n n 51.
u M us, Ur, rub, flood, turn, p. 45.
e (r) M erst, sir, her, first, nerve, p. 49.
ou n out, owl, how, vouch, noun, p. 46. n 52.
NOTES ON THE LIST.
1. Five of the foregoing will be found to be composite,
that is, composed of two of the other vowels spoken in succes-
sion quick as thought, but both heard (pp. 37, 40, 44, 46).
2. The page references point to the places where the vowel
sounds and the formations for them are explained, where
also will be found other letters or combinations that are in
use to symbolise the same sound. Among these we do not
include rare usages. For example, we do not give ai as
a symbol of e or of i though said is pronounced sed and
captain, captin.
3. Where this list gives two sounds of a, as in am and all,
some good authorities and dictionaries give three. Their
first is brought nearer to the sound of e in eZZ. That is, am
comes much nearer being em. And between their first and
third they give as samples ask, vast, bath. We are of those
who prefer two, partly because those who adopt three are not
agreed as to some words whether to give them the middle or
first place, and as to others whether their place is middle oi
34 SPEAKING.
third ; but principally because of observing that the attempt
to use three leads to much the greater number of mispronun-
ciations, especially in mincing the first, and because the first
of the three is less resonant and effective in speech.
4. While this list, in accord with good authority, takes
the sound of u in urn and I/urn to be the same as in up and
but, there are some who class ur, even down to hurly-burly,
with her ; and on the other hand there are some who class
her and the like under the u of up. Of the two we should
prefer the latter. Together they may be taken as neutral-
ising each other and clearing the ground for those who, as in
this list, recognise a difference between such words as earn
and urn, fir and fur, pearl and purl, birch and lurch, kerb
and curb.
e as in eel.
Other symbols of this sound : ee, ea, ei, ey, ie, i, as in see,
lea, seize, key, niece, clique.
Formation: The tongue rises mound-shaped pressing its
sides against the upper teeth, and fitting the palate at a
point well forward so as to leave a very small passage at
the top for the air current. Its front (it has ' point ' only
when stretched out) retreats from the front teeth, and is
directed horizontally to guide the current out clear of them.
The lips are open from corner to corner.
Faults: (a) The front of the tongue touching above or
below, or the current striking the teeth, or the lips not suffi-
ciently open, makes the sound impure, (b) Tapering the
sound off into a breath when it concludes a word. It must
be kept vocal throughout, (c) Giving it impurely when the
word or syllable is to be lightly spoken.
See under E, p. 50.
Exercises : Eel, eke, eve, ease, east ; be, thee, we, lee, tea,
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 35
sea, see, three, the, 1 key, knee, quay ; been, bean, feel, field,
weed, beach, seize, scene, peace, piece, need, knead, leek,
leak, scream, theme, breathe, sheathe, leave, leaf, fleece,
thief, wreath, sweet, suite ; apiece, obese, police, fatigue,
relief, appeal, entreat ; reason, feeling, query, meagre, penal,
edict, teaching, feature, people; behold, below, beyond,
delay, detain, elide, evade, escape, educe, emit, beware,
debar, request, preserve, secure, return ; concrete, timepiece,
gangrene ; revisit, republic, velocity ; committee.
i as in ill.
Other symbol : y, as in lymph.
Formation : The tongue rises as for last sound, the closest
part of the air-passage between it and the palate being very
slightly farther back and very slightly opener. The chief
difference is that in this case the cavity behind the risen
part of the tongue is wider, giving a little more resonance.
Faults: (a) A tendency to the last sound e.g., dutee,
ceetee, keeng, keenydom. Let the student take other words
of the same form and sound which are hardly found wrong
and repeat them side by side with words liable to error, as
sing with king, (b) On the other hand there may be a
tendency to a way of sounding it which is common in Scotch,
of more body and hardness, and somewhat farther back in
the mouth than the true sound, (c) In some parts of Scot-
land, and in Ireland, the tendency is to u, as silk to sulk.
1 A young man came straight from his teacher of elocution saying,
1 Tlia [as in am] quality of mercy.' This is monstrous. Even in sing-
ing, where it may still be heard, it is inexcusable ; for surely * the ' is
as easily sung as 'he' or 'me.' When 'the' has any degree of em-
phasis, it must get the sound illustrated above ; at other times it may
either be the same sound briefer, or that of i in HI.
36 SPEAKING.
(d) Another fault would seem to be an affectation, dute, cite
(the e of ell).
See under E, p. 50.
Exercises : 111, if, in, ink, is, it ; bid, dip, will, with, his,
gild, guild, width, fin, gin, midst, sin, hinge, kin, ring,
king, lift, drill, links, lynx; fiddle, vineyard, children,
kingdom, symbol, synod, widow, little, whisper, hyssop,
mirror, miracle, spirit, vigour ; cigar, direct, finance, divorce,
sincere; outbid, admit, fulfil, consist, enrich; acid, axis,
languish, holly, many, busy, lady, ladies, fancy, fancies,
needy, needing, sleepy, sleeping, profit, sheriff, furtive, facile,
justice, vestige, cowslip, bodkin, maxim.
e as in ell.
Other symbol : ea, as in health.
Formation : The closest part of the air-passage between the
tongue and the palate is farther back and is more open, and
the tongue is rather more withdrawn in front. The forma-
tion is about half way between ee and ah (pp. 34, 39) : the
top of the tongue-curve has now descended and receded till
it is nearly midway in the mouth, both vertically and from
front to back.
Faults : (a) One may at times hear a sound which, for ex-
ample, would almost give last instead of lest, or man instead
of men, by the formation being too far back in the mouth ;
but (b) there is very frequently to be heard the opposite
error produced by a formation too far forward. The sound
is difficult to describe, but it is a feeble thing, sometimes
almost the i of ill (yis for yes), sometimes a malformed a of
ale. The correct sound is heard in the Scotch het for Jiot,
and in the Latin rein.
See under E, p. 50.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 37
Exercises : Ebb, edge, egg, elm, else, etch, elk ; bell, den,
men, get, set, shelf, pelf, fend, friend, wept, health, bred,
breath, test, check, debt ; helmet, tendril, tenure, merry,
very, berry, bury, ferry, emblem, pleasant, splendid, pedlar,
welkin, twenty, leopard, heather, empire, extract, enter,
ebon ; endow, extreme, emboss, estate ; intrench, forget,
gazette, instead, infect, bereft, unless, confess ; noted,
weeded, slighted, folded, hopest, lovest, prayeth, thinketh,
feareth, useless, reckless, speechless, witness, madness, stiff-
ness, soreness, figment, ailment, wicked, conscience, prophet,
trammel, magnet, ancient.
a as in ale.
Other symbols: ea, ai, ei, ay, ey, as in break, aim, rein,
day, obey.
Formation : This sound is composite. Its parts are e
as in ell followed by e as in eel. Utter both sounds
distinctly in succession, and again with less break between
them, and finally with continuous voice. The latter sound
is never to be omitted even in the very shortest utterance,
though proportionately short.
Note. According to the classing of some we should have
taken this sound before the e of ell instead of after it, as
being a trifle farther forward in the mouth. But this is true
only of its middle and latter part : taking the beginning and
radical part of it as the e of ell, it is more scientific to place
it here after the study of that sound, and certainly this is
also more convenient for the student.
Faults : (a) Omission of the ee element. This element is
unknown in Scotch, and therefore in Scotland this vowel-
sound has almost always to be acquired. (&) The mere pro-
longation of the first part of the composite sound, becoming
38 SPEAKING.
feebler as it proceeds. (c) A single sound intermediate
between the sounds of the two component parts, a sort of
compromise, (d) In England a very prevalent fault is to
substitute for this sound one which is often scarcely dis-
tinguishable from the i of isle, being only a little more
forward in the mouth e.g., wife, lidy, for wait, lady.
See under R, p. 50.
Exercises: Distinguish by utterance between the words
in each of the following pairs : Ell, ail ; bell, bale; bled, blade;
bred, braid ; cell, sale ; dell, dale ; den, Dane ; edge, age ; fell, fail ;
fen, fane ; get, gate ; ken, cane ; lens, lanes ; let, late ; men, main ;
knell, nail ; pen, pain ; pent, paint ; quell, quail ; red, raid ; tell, tail ;
wren, rain ; wreck, rake ; speck, spake ; sped, spade ; set, sate ; tent,
taint ; tread, trade ; test, taste ; west, waste ; well, wail ; wed, wade.
Aim, ate, ape, ace, eight, ale, age ; amen, 1 azure, aching,
ably ; way, pray, bay, day, say, clay, grey, weigh ; spake,
same, mate, rein, bail, babe, wane, grace, lame, bathe, knave,
reign, quake, straight, safe, save, take, vain, plague; wafer,
hatred, eighteen, lady, praying, faithful, saviour, gracious,
stranger, nation, cradle, plaintive, naked, pathos, favour,
razor, shadeless, baneful, hailstone, flagrant ; dismay, portray,
decay, inveigh, affray, obey ; engage, exhale, degrade, retail,
complain, defame, assail, pervade, sustain, assuage, partake,
relate, forsake, deface, behave ; pottage, preface, dotage,
1 An English rector recently from Oxford says ' amen ' is only pro-
nounced ' ah-men ' in singing ; when said by the minister alone, or
read from Scripture, it is pronounced as above. On the other hand, a
canon of Westminster says that, even in reading, ' ah-men ' is coming
in, and that when it is spoken in prayer by the minister alone most
say 'ah-men.' The inference seems to be that the practice differs in
different parts. The origin of the word is of no account : English
takes its own way with the words it adopts. The ah sound docs not
seem the natural expression of a confiding spirit (p. 148). Certainly it
cannot be so spoken as to excel the other in beauty or appropriate
expressiveness. Whichever is called for by usage, let pains be taken
to speak it as it ought to be spoken.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 39
palace, homage, portrait, herbage, mortgage, terrace, agate,
surface, salvage, sulphate, headache ; oblation, consolation,
acquaintance, education, equator, potato, approbation, dis-
sipation, retaining, bewailing, defamer.
a as in am.
Formation: The changes are still a little farther in the
same direction. The top of the tongue curve is about the
middle of the mouth ; the tongue also, being now a little
hollowed along its posterior half, shapes itself there rather to
the floor than the roof of the mouth. There is a wider cavity
behind, giving more resonance.
Faults : In Scotch the only sound of this kind is nearer
to the next sound than to this, and the attempt to give this
is apt in Scotland to be carried too far with the effect of
mincing affectation which is a fault also of some English-
men without the excuse.
See. note 3, p. 33.
Exercises: Add, am, ant, as, at, act, ask, axe; bad, bat,
can, fact, gag, hand, hang, lap, man, nap, pat, stamp, van,
waft, wax, last, mast, past ; arrow, anthem, atom, album,
adverb ; fragile, gander, quagmire, carriage, marriage, magic,
napkin, placid, satchel, rabid, matin ; withstand, romance,
despatch, protract; extra, woman, upland, combat.
a as in ah.
Formation : The tongue is flat in the floor of the mouth
within the teeth, and wholly covers it.
Faults : (a) One tendency is in the direction of the last
sound, robbing the language of the fine effective character of
this sound. (6) Another is to give it in some words the
40 SPEAKING.
sound of aw. (c) Again, such words as card, guaid, garden,
may be heard as cyard, gyard, and gyafden, the explanation
of which evidently is that, this a being formed in the mouth
farther back than c (k) and g (p. 61), the correct speaker goes
back from c and g to pick up a, and this produces a nice
effect which others attempt in vain to imitate by the easier
method of inserting y, often also following it with a more
forward sound of the vowel.
Notandum: This is generally the sound of a before r and
another consonant, or r final ; and almost always before Im.
If, Ive, when Z is silent.
See note 3, p. 33.
Exercises : Arch, art, alms, arm, are ; far, mar, bark, carp,
clerk, dart, heart, march, marsh, park, start, charge, can't,
calf, halve, palm, psalm, qualm, laugh, bah, balm ; cartridge,
partner, tartan, farthing, father, garden, bargain, darkness,
hearken, marvel, starling ; debar, enlarge, disarm, remark,
becalm, mamma, papa ; lunar, monarch, niggard, dotard,
sugar, wizard, haggard.
i as in isle.
Other symbol : y, as in try.
Formation : This sound is composite. Its parts are a as in
ah and e as in eel the tongue ascending from the one
position to the other. Utter both sounds distinctly in suc-
cession, and again with less break between them, and finally
with continuous voice. The ah portion, though abruptly
uttered, should have its true sound.
Faults: (a) The fault explained in '(c)' under last
vowel, producing ) Combinations of n and I are difficult, and should be
particularly practised e.g., been late; tell none, (c) The
sound of n, like that of m, may be prolonged (pp. 54, 57).
(d) When kn or gn begins a syllable, the k or g is silent
e.g., kneel, unknown, gnash.
Exercises: Wean, pin, then, vain, can, barn, fine, pawn,
mourn, sown, boon, tune, brown, learn, burn, even, 1 bidden,
ashen, stolen, reason, heathen, beckon ; neat, name, nice, nor,
nook, new, noise, knell, knob, gnarl ; snake, snow, snub ;
dense, chance, lines, crowns, crowned, land, leaned, rent,
1 Of en final, see p. 81.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 61
paint, tenth, since, punch, change ; never, native, neutral ;
neglect, north-east, narrate ; dinner, honey, coinage, fancy,
inlet, anthem, tender, illness, mourner; beneath, renew, en-
dure, control, misname, ignite ; begin, remain, alone, design,
suborn; fortune, cabin, lion, famine, layman, stubborn.
K, G, Ng.
These are corresponding breath, vocal, and vocal - nasal
articulations.
(1) K.
Other symbols: c, ch, and the first half of re, as in cage,
arc, chord, monarch, lax, text; qu for kw, as in queen,
sequence, and for k rarely, as in pique, conquer.
Formation: Complete obstruction by the contact of the
back part of the tongue with the palate, followed by their
audible separation.
Faults: (a) See a faulty pronunciation connected with k
before the sound of ah, p. 40 ' (c).' (b) Allowing emission
of breath laterally.
Exercises: Seek, pick, neck, sack, dike, look, duke, break,
cheque, elk, silk, park ; key, keep, kin, keg, cage, cat, carve ;
kine, kerb, curb, cob, cone, core, cool, cube, coil, count;
queen, quell, qualm, quire, quote ; clean, clip, cloud, cloy ;
creep, cram, cross, cry, crowd ; skate, school, scream, scrap,
squeeze, squire ; walks, dux, fact, strict, flocks, flocked,
picked ; tackle, hearken, waken, sickle, sicken, wrinkle ;
kidney, candour, chemist, clomled; canal, canoe, contain,
collapse ; echo, weaker, liking, ticket, chalky, action, pack-
man, picture, workhouse, bodkin, turkey, anchor, banquet;
acute, decay, recoil, bequeath, eclipse, succeed, discuss,
unkind, inquire ; unlock, antique, revoke ; outlook, frolic,
toothache, moonstruck.
62 SPEAKING.
(2) a.
This vocal corresponds to the breath articulation k.
Other symbol : the first half of x, as in exist.
Formation : Same as for k, with the addition of an effort
of voice during contact of the articulating organs.
Faults: (a) See a faulty pronunciation connected with
g before the sound of ah, p. 40 ' (c). 1 (b) A degree of
nasality preceding the articulation from insufficient energy
to be corrected by forcibly practising the explosive prop-
erty of the articulation. (c) Insufficient vocal sound
pointing to the need of practice in prolonging the attempt
at sound as much as possible. The sound can only go
on (p. 54) so long as the gathering air behind the point
of obstruction allows more to come through the cords.
(<1) Permitting lateral explosiveness of g before Z, changing
globe into dlobe.
Notandum: Another sound of g it has in common with
y, as in gem, jet (pp. 67, 71).
Exercises: Dig, egg, league, vague, rag, dug, log, rogue;
gear, get, gape, guile, gird, gulf, got, gold, ghost, gown;
gleam, glib, glen, glade, glide, glut, gloss, glow ; great, grim,
grape, graft, grub, ground; fagged, begged, plagued, figs,
lags, mugs, logs ; eagle, juggle ; gearing, gunshot, gloaming,
graphic ; gazette, guitar, grimace ; regal, vigour, ague, pagan,
waggon, tiger, signet, ugly, argue, ingot ; again, cigar, regale,
agree, ignore, engulf, misgive ; fatigue, prorogue, agog ; col-
league, iceberg.
(3) Ng.
This is the vocal-nasal articulation corresponding to the
breath and vocal k and g. It is a single sound a nasal g.
Formation : The same mouth-obstructive formation as for
k and g, and the same vocalising as for g, but while for
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 63
g the whole of the vocal current is directed against the
obstructing organs in the mouth, in this case the nasal pas-
sage is opened by a slight movement of the soft palate
(not enough to shut off the mouth), and a current passes
through the nose. Hence the sound may be prolonged
(pp. 54, 57). The articulation is finished by the separation
of the obstructing organs.
Fault : Following the sound with the sound of g or k
caused by not making it nasal to the end e.g., sing-g.
Notandum : N before k or g frequently takes the sound of
ng. For example, the pronunciation of thank is not than-k,
but thang-k ; and similarly we have tang-kard, long-ger,
Eng-glish. This never occurs when the accented syllable
follows these consonants e.g., ungodly, unkind, incline, are
not ung-godly, &c.
Exercises: Sang, rang, wing, spring, flung, gong, wrong;
length, strength, thank, link, slunk, twanged, longed, rings,
hangs; angle, uncle, tinkle, bungle; anxious, banker, lan-
guage, kingly, anger, finger, longer, hunger ; belong, un-
wrung, prolong ; shilling, speaking, furlong.
F,V.
These are corresponding breath and vocal articulations.
(1) F.
Other symbols : gh and ph, as in laugh, physic.
Formation : The middle of the lower lip touches with its
edge the tips of the upper teeth, and is rapidly withdrawn
downward and backward. The part of the lip in contact
with the teeth is not so large as to intercept the breath
entirely, but causes sufficient obstruction to produce a degree
of explosiveness when they are separated.
1
64 SPEAKING.
Faults : (a) Turning out the lip and touching the teeth
with the inside of it. (j>) Using the two lips instead of the
under lip and upper teeth. This may be the best device
where there are no upper teeth.
Notandum : The /in of is pronounced v, and the whole
word uv. See p. 46, footnote.
Exercises: Leaf, safe, muff, roof, loaf, wife, laugh, cough,
lymph, dwarf ; feet, fill, fed, phase, fan, farce, five, fear, fur,
fall, fop, foal, fore, food ; flee, flit, flame, flat, fly, flew ; free,
frill, friend, from, phrase, fright, few, fume, sphere ; theft,
sift, snuffed, coughed, safes, muffs ; muffle, toughen, rifle ;
fever, falter, forward, flighty, frontal; foment, forbear, fore-
gone ; sofa, reefing, laughter, stiffly, roughness, downfall, sur-
face, comfort, hopeful ; before, afraid, deflect, perform, mis-
fit ; belief, unsafe, enough ; woodruff, mastiff, tariff.
(2) V.
This voice articulation corresponds to the breath /.
Formation : The same as for /, with the addition of the
action giving it vocal quality. The breath which in / flows
noiselessly between the lip and teeth where they are not in
contact, in v brings a degree of voice from the cords. The
sound of v may be prolonged, because the current having vent
may be continued, as was explained under M (p. 57).
Fault : Neglecting to give the vocal quality.
Exercises: Eve, weave, give, save, have, halve, five, dove,
groove, salve, serve ; veer, vein, vat, vile, vault, voice, verb,
vouch ; leaves, selves, slaves, knives, heaved, delved, curved ;
driven, seven, craven ; vanish, vapour, vocal ; veneer, vacate,
vedette ; lever, waving, cavern, oval, river, lively, envy, ad-
vent ; event, prevail, advise, convey ; alive, behave, reserve ;
motive, conclave, active.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 65
Sn
, z.
These are corresponding breath and vocal articulations.
Other symbols . c and the second' half of x, as in cinder,
face, axle, box.
Formation : The tongue touches the upper teeth and gums
at all parts, obstructing the breath, except in front where
there is a narrow passage over the middle of its front part
(not merely the edge), through which the breath is sent
with a clear hissing sound. The articulation ends by abrupt
explosive withdrawal of the tongue from that position.
Faults : (a) A lisp caused by the front of the tongue
touching the teeth, (b) The sound of sh, caused by draw-
ing back the front edge too much and raising the tongue in
the middle, (c) Emitting the breath at the sides of the
tongue, (d) A tendency to say sh when yoo follows, as in
suit, saying shoot for syoot ; in some words sh for s is
authorised, as in sure, issue, pronounced shoor, ishyoo.
Notandum . Much practice is required to give clearly, and
with proper fluency, such word combinations embodying s
and t as fits, starts / tastes, states.
Exercises: Piece, miss, less, face, gas, else, thrice, tense,
vex, fuss, worse, course, loose, house, voice, tacks, box, feats,
axe, harps ; send, sail", side, scene, sir, cell, sole, sore, suit,
soil, sound ; speak, spade, spire, spawn, spoke, sprain, spruce,
splash, splice, sleet, slay, slant, small, smote, snow, snipe,
swan, swift, steep, stun, stream, strain, skill, sketch, scheme,
scrap, square ; least, faced, loosed, nest, worst ; tussle, lessen,
thistle, hasten ; saving, cedar, certain, slavish, standard ;
sedate, suborn, stampede ; message, tacit, biscuit, loosely,
insight, tiresome ; beside, receive, dislike, aspire, foresee,
excel; amiss, relates, condense; kindness, furnace, packets.
66 SPEAKING.
(2) Z.
This is the vocal articulation corresponding to the breath s.
Other symbols: s and the second half of x, as in peas,
buds, rosin, exalt.
formation : The same as for s, with the addition of
vocalisation during the obstruction.
Faults : These are of the same kind as in the case of s.
Notandum : In the inflexions of nouns and verbs final s
after a vowel or vocal consonant has the sound of z.
Exercises : Breeze, graze, these, size, is, goes, wise, sirs,
dogs, adze, furze, loaves, ills, tongs, writhes ; zeal, zest, zone ;
dazed, used, teased ; chasm, frozen, prism, muzzle, weasel ; zero,
zenith, zealous ; razor, hazard, rising, lazy, music, puzzling,
pansy ; design, preserve, preside, exact, exert ; amaze, confuse,
propose ; topaz, alcoves, legends.
Sh, Zh.
These are corresponding breath and vocal articulations.
(1) Sh.
Other symbols : si, ci, ti, as in mission, vicious, nation ;
also ch, as in cliaise, and when it follows the sound (though
unwritten) of t, as in batch, beach, chain (beatsh, tshain).
Formation: From its position at s the tongue is drawn
back and raised in the middle. The aperture through which
the breath hisses is slightly enlarged.
It will make clear the difference between s and sh, and is
a good exercise, to draw the tongue backwards and forwards
from one to the other repeatedly during the same expiration.
Faults: (a) Projecting the lips, (b) See pp. 65, 71.
Notandum This sound (sh) preceded by t constitutes the
sound of ch as in chain; and the sound thus constituted
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 67
(tsh) is in some parts and by some persons used erroneously
for its corresponding vocal dzh, as in John, Tshon for Dzhon.
Exercises : Wish, rush, dash, inch, quench, marsh ; sheep,
shift, shed, shape, chaise, sham, shark, shun, short, share,
shoot, shred, shrive ; lashed, pushed ; freshen, washen ;
shepherd, shoulder, shortly ; champagne, cheroot, chagrin ;
washer, precious, nation, ocean, passion, rashness, mushroom,
hardship, conscience, anxious ; ashore, unship, enshrine ;
abash, refresh ; foolish, punish. After t (tsh) : fetch, watch,
each, niche, rich, preach, much, birch, poach ; charm, child,
choose, chant, churn ; hatched, reached ; chamber, chatter ;
chastise ; pitcher, duchess, witchcraft, mischief, urchin;
achieve, mischance ; bewitch, approach ; sandwich, ostrich.
(2) Zh.
This vocal articulation corresponds to the breath sh.
Symbols : The symbol zh is not in actual use. It is used
here to spell the vocalised sh, which in practice is represented
only by the symbols s, z, and some of those symbols which
we have seen taking the place of sh.
Formation : Same as for sh with the addition of vocality.
The difference between the breath and vocal characters is
well shown in the pronunciation of the words vicious and
vision (vishious and vizhion).
Notandum : The sound of zh preceded by that of d con-
stitutes the sound which is common to j and g, as in wages,
John (wadzhes, Dzhon), giving the vocalised form of the
breath tsh.
Exercises: Lesion, vision, leisure, measure, seizure, pleas-
ure. After d (dzh) : jeer, gem, jail, gibe, just ; edge, cage,
badge, bulge ; lodged, raged ; regent, budget, rigid, judgment,
perjure; ajar, rejoice, adjoin, abjure, unjust; dislodge a be-
siege, divulge; orange, knowledge, salvage.
68 SPEAKING.
Th breath as in thin, and vocal as in this.
In this case we have but one symbol for the breath and
voice articulations.
(1) Th breath.
Formation : The front edge of the tongue rests lightly on
the inner side of the upper teeth, and breath issues over the
sides of its forepart. The explosive recall of the tongue
from this degree of obstruction finishes the articulation.
The first practice in this articulation should be to keep the
tongue in its position steadily for some seconds and the
breath flowing continuously over the sides, before finishing
the articulation.
Faults: (a) Putting the tongue between the teeth. (&)
Letting the tongue touch the lower teeth.
Exercises: Teeth, pith, faith, hath, cloth, truth, mouth,
with (a twig), wealth, birth, north ; theme, thank, thigh,
thump, thought, three, thrill, threat, thrice, through ; thwack,
thwart ; heaths, friths, moths, girthed, frothed ; thirty, thun-
der, thimble, thicken ; ether, pathos, nothing, worthless,
panther, something, stealthy; athirst, bethink, enthrall;
forsooth, unearth ; doeth, seventh.
(2) Th vocal.
Formation : The same as in the preceding, with the addi-
tion of vocality during its formation.
Faults and practice are also of the same kind.
Notandum : In a few words tli final, though breath in the
singular, is vocal in the plural as in paths, oaths y mouths.
Exercises : Seethe, lathe, writhe, scythe, smooth, with (the
preposition) ; thee, this, there, that, thine, thence, though ;
clothes, smooths, tithes, sheathed, bathed, writhed, mouthed ;
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 69
therefore, thenceforth ; thyself, themselves ; teething, wither,
tether, bathing, fathom, father, mother, worthy, clothing.
Wh, W.
These are corresponding breath and vocal articulations.
(1) Wh.
This represents one simple breath articulation.
Formation : The lips are almost closed, and then rapidly
separated, without the air current having been quite ob-
structed. The sound may be heard by the experimenter as
a sort of swish, like the cut of a whip through the air.
Faults: (a) Omitting the aspirate element of the sound,
and saying witch for which, wat for what, (b) Not confining
the action to the lips, but also giving a guttural sound.
Notandum: Before o and oo the sound can only be ex-
pressed roughly, or not at all. Consequently the wh gives
place to simple h. E.g., whole, who become hole, hoo.
Exercises : Wheel, whale, wharf, while, wheat, wheeze,
when, whence, whet, where, what, which, whiff, whim, whit,
white, why, whine, whirl, whisk ; whistle, whether, whither,
wherry ; nowhere, somewhat, meanwhile.
(2) W.
This voice articulation corresponds to the breath ivh.
Formation : The lips are almost closed ; an effort of voice
is made, which produces a suppressed sound of oo ; then the
lips very smartly take position for the vowel that is to follow.
Fault; Omission, or imperfect enunciation, before oo in
such words as wood, wool.
Notanda: (a) In wr, w is silent, as in write, wreck, (b)
When a as in am or ah immediately follows w it generally
takes the sound of o in o/, or e.g., want y wash, war t walk.
70 SPEAKING.
Exercises : We, weed, weak, weal ; wit, with, will, wind ;
wen, went, were, wet ; wail, wage, way, waste ; wax, waft,
wag, won, work, was, warm, watch, woe; wore, woo, wool,
womb ; wipe, wise, wile ; dwarf, dwell, sweep, sway, thwart,
thwack ; winter, wealthy ; within, withstand ; seaweed, al-
ways, gateway, forward; away, bewail, reward, outwit.
This is a vocal, with no corresponding breath articulation.
Formation : A current of clear sound flows over the sides
of the back of the tongue, the air being elsewhere obstructed
by contact of the tongue with the front of the palate and
the side teeth; the lips are drawn back. The abrupt re-
moval of the obstruction by the withdrawal of the tongue
is the articulative part of the action. The sound of I may
be prolonged, because a portion of the breath is escaping.
Faults: (a) A faulty I is produced by such causes as
making the two apertures for the sound too small or too
long ; by not making the obstruction air-tight ; by mounding
up the tongue, and so on. (b) In certain combinations
inserting a sound (like i of in) after /, as in elm : the sound-
ing of Z must go on till the lips shut for m, which has
then to be exploded.
Exercises: Eel, peal, ill, rill, ell, fell, ail, shall, file, style,
earl, foal, roll, soul, cool, tool, cowl, howl, boil, furl, snarl,
steeple, rifle, table, shackle, puddle, bugle, axle ; lea, lift,
late, lax, large, lithe, learn, luff, lawn, loin, lo, loo, loud,
lute ; blot, cliff, flash, globe, play, sloop ; help, bulk, held,
healed, selves, felt, field, curls, nails, nailed, miles, false;
film, fallen, realm; later, lisping, lunar; lament, lampoon;
relic, sullen, miller, almost, elbow, bulrush, public, inlet;
alert, elude, enlarge, purloin ; distil, annul ; scandal, reptile.
VOWELS AND CONSONANTS. 71
Y.
This is a vocal, with no corresponding breath articulation.
Formation: The tongue rises against the palate scarcely
behind its position for ee. An effort of voice during the
obstruction gives the vocal element, and the abrupt release
of the obstruction the articulative.
Faults : (a) Omitting y before ee : saying, e.g., eer, eeld,
for year, yield. (&) Putting h for y between s and oo, as
shoot for suit ; see p. 65. (c) For y substituting sh after t,
and zh after d e.g., for tune, righteous, feature, education,
saying tshoon, rightshus, featshoor, edzhoocation.
Exercises: Ye, yean, year, yeast, yield, yes, yell, yam,
yard, yearn, young, yon, yore, you, youth ; lawyer, court-
yard; beyond, unyoke.
0, Oh, J, Ph, Q, X.
These symbols have not been treated separately, because
of their being represented in others.
c is equivalent either to s as in face, or to k as in coal.
ch is composed of t and sh (tsh), as in chain (p. 66), or is
equivalent to k, as in chorus (p. 61).
j is composed, as g also often is (p. 62), of d and zh (dzh,
the vocalised form of tsh), as in John (p. 67).
ph is equivalent to /.
g, with u which always follows it is equivalent to kw
or to k (p. 61).
x is equivalent to ks or gz according as the articulation is
breath or vocal, as in luxury and anxiety (luksury, angziety).
72
PART IIL
WORDS.
IT is only when the student has mastered every vowel sound
and articulation that he has the materials for rendering
correctly any word that may be put before him. But to
possess the materials and to put them deftly together are
very different things ; and it is certain that he must be able
to do this for words before he can in like manner put words
together in sentences. He is therefore earnestly advised to
practise the outspoken utterance of words, so formed and
collated that they not only facilitate his use of what he has
acquired, but aid him in judging of his correctness. We
propose first to render assistance in this.
Dictionaries : We have seen that almost every symbol has
more sounds than one ; and the question follows, What does
it represent in any given word 1 For this the learner must
have a dictionary by him. But dictionaries have idio-
syncrasies : one of good repute lies by the writer which,
if followed throughout, would make a by-word of any man.
And dictionaries have difficulties, as when driven to represent
that the o of note is possible before r (p. 51). And diction-
aries differ. He who would be correct and not peculiar
should have at least two dictionaries, and where they differ
take that which is most familiar to his hearers. It is pain-
fully significant of the interest they have taken in the sub-
WORDS. 73
ject, and of the stage which their education in it has reached,
when young men have not discovered their need of a pro-
nouncing dictionary.
Affectations: Some who are not what is called affected
gain for themselves that undesirable reputation by peculi-
arities which rightly directed pains should have prevented.
If one is really an affected person, he is vain of his affecta-
tions, and advice is wasted on him. But affectations from
whatever cause are hindrances to success and to respect.
Among the worst are the gawkiness of putting w for r,
and the silly lisping of th wholly or partially for s. We
lately heard a somewhat affected person who aims at a
fine r, and who said ' peffectly,' 'pehaps,' 4 comf ootable ' !
The latest thing which is ministering to the happiness of
many is to omit g from the ing of present participles, probably
thinkin or hopin it will be thought interestin ease of manner.
It is the Scotch form. Is it a compliment to Scotch 1 The
compliment would be costly to English, for it can ill afford
to lose a single sound that has resonance, and would only
compare the worse with Scotch, which is already much
more resonant. Such a usage would make the language
distinctly poorer. The a in * command' (and a few other
words e.g., l grant') is not infrequently given now more
as it is in ah than in am; but this is no excuse for com-
mitting the two faults of making it nasal and drawling it.
We say nothing of military usage, which may have reasons
of its own, but ordinarily those faults are mere affectation.
Only yesterday we witnessed a case of (to adopt the fable)
plain, very plain, jackdaw throughout with the single excep-
tion of this one strut in borrowed feathers ludicrous and
painful.
An unusual pronunciation from the mouth of any person
should not be adopted without being verified.
74
SPEAKING.
c5 .j
d
0> .ti
- ^
rt rt ^
O ^}
-^ -*3
"o -*a ?3 2 'os "S
O ^ 03 -i, O S3
O O O C7"^ O O
ti
8
T$ . nd 2 nd
O> i-rt 03 T5 T3 ?-i
^
O ^ T2 .2 ^^ ^_
O
O fl J ^
M P^
^^lOCOt-CiOiO
diCOCOCOCOCOCO^t 1
WORDS.
75
a *
2
a
o
PH
to S> 2
.5 * %
^ o3 MJ
s'
8 1
a a
8
CP 03
rn
of
r
1-3 & I
**H **H i-S r5 P-l
O
P^ PH
;
03
111
*?3 S ,
S jT .^
c3 S o o5
2 P S
S -S g
* *4 H*
S 03 I-H ^-i >
a a I
^J d Q
1 s i
<^> *" o
! i
1^-9
T& ^ O
s -a ^
o o
O
,0
a*
^* o g g ||
oo J5 .g oo
^0303 OO ^.XJ 'OO
O) -I
'So 'o
O I-H O <> O
rH O i I CO o
P ? -SS
3 33 a a
64 *t
II II
33 a> .1-5
eg c3 T3 *&
P d
.2
g'-S ^0
il II II
pendant.
pendent.
a - 'o'g
's a s
a 9" S
de
di
a a
? li -S-E
ij s^
0) 0)
a a
fe O 'Pn'o, o5^
^ ^ 3 ^ .P .^P
00 QQ 02 00 i-P rfi
j i
a a
l.
el.
manne
manor.
El.1
1 !
wr.
wayer.
'
' jo ^ -
o rt
:t I
a a
>
r-H ' ' C3 ^ "S tl *
^S 4 Li ir Ua 31 s
s i
S. a
S '5
g
|| ^
-SS 4
'
p2$^ o e3
eg) 2^5 g
s-s &S. S>
onerary.
honorar
as,
-
8.13
s
S^
II
WOKDS. 77
Facility of distinct speech has not been attained till such
combinations as the following are spoken clearly and natur-
ally (see p. 55, par. 4; and under * Articulation/ p. 19) :
He would pain nobody, but he could pay nobody.
His crime moved me ; his cry moved me not.
Five-sixths should be given, not eleven- twelfths.
Wet ground brought much trouble.
The last king left monarchy stronger.
The stupid detractor wrote twice to him.
Dost thou own nothing, and owe nothing ?
I never read Duncan on Nonagons.
An ice-house is a nice house in a hot day.
Their riches, sad to say, were their ruin.
Swift of foot and slow of tongue.
It is difficult to achieve fame.
The gig goes swiftly past the spot.
Our soul loatheth this light bread.
The first ten verses of the first chapter.
The creatures seemed of monstrous size, with monstrous eyes.
Not Irish yews, but Irish shoes.
She says she said she shed tears ceaselessly.
The floors shall be full and the fats shall overflow.
--It was not all most awful, but almost awful.
A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.
A great sheet knit at the four corners and let down.
Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard his spots ?
Did you say ' his kin ' and * his pots ' ?
I would not give a cent to see the ascent.
We set apart a part for the absent.
A sad dearth, and a sad earth.
" " An honoured dame with an honoured aim.
. He gave a nod and an odd and doubtful look.
Never rancour proved so powerless, never anchor so powerful
Thou that judges t doest the same things.
Thou art confident that thou art wise.
He bade me take air, but meant I should take care.
He will prate to anybody, and will pray to nobody.
This statement tells strongly against table-turning.
The brig aids the brigades.
Their tastes and distastes seem to us strange.
Mayhap pallor or wrinkle let out the secret.
The pistol which shot him was one which she gave him.
78 SPEAKING.
I said that they wash shawls, not that they wash awla.
A peak quite two thousand feet to climb.
It is truly rural, very rural truly.
Six black rows of six black crows singing croak, croak, croak.
All lancers shall answer the call.
They cannot stop luck, but may stop pluck.
Say ' chaste stars,' not ' chase tars. '
He appointed a pointed demand to be sent.
Read, 'the panting spirit sighs,' not 'the panting spirit's eyes/
The doctor said I w0 atonic and prescribed a tonic.
The dawn never finds the daw napping.
The old duck quacks sadly.
The statist's statistics state it statistically.
Thou shalt take no offered donation.
He said 'abundant toil,' not 'abundant oil.'
An arrow painted on a narrow panel.
They have got all ready already.
He meant not a grey chief, but a great sheaf.
He was a midshipman amid shipmen.
All now use fine linen like that.
Speaking of piump plovers he always said plump lovers.
They wished to obtain either, not to obtain neither.
They with this with thought to tie him.
He said * for conscience' ache,' instead of ' for conscience' sake.'
Who knows if a noise annoys an oyster !
A dark cloud and dreadful lightning.
Time was when that gem went a-begging.
The home vacant, the name forgot.
ACCENT.
One thing more appertaining to individual words must be
noticed accent. This is a certain superior stress or weight
of voice put on some syllable of a word, making it of such
consequence among its fellows as to give unity and distinc-
tive character to the word. Also, by being put on another
syllable of the same word, it enables the word to serve
different uses as in conduct, which has one meaning when
the accent is on the first, and another when it is on the
second syllable. Sometimes it is changed from its ordinary
WORDS. 79
place by emphasis on a syllable, as in expressing antithesis,
e.g. r ' He must mcrease, but I must decrease ' ; but not always,
e.g., ' He that descended also ascended.'
There may be more accents than one, of different degrees, in
a word, the principal one being generally the last. When two
or more syllables precede the accented syllable, one or more
of them will have a secondary accent, thus : cdnnona'de,
o'pportu'nity, inti' mida" tion, impenetrability, latitu'dina"-
rian. The case of the principal accent being first is shown,
for example, in pe"netra'tive, ge"ntlemanli'ke, opi"niona'tive-
ness. The placing of a subordinate accent need not give
concern.
There is in some quarters an objectionable tendency to
bring the principal accent forward to the first syllable, as
in concentrate, demonstrate, co'nsummative, purporting, for
concentrate, demonstrate, consu'mmative, purporting. It
is scarcely possible to imagine agreeable eloquence in a lan-
guage having a preponderance of words so accented. And
surely it is not by deliberation that the accent is brought
from the body of a word and put on a prefix. But those
who wish to discharge a word at a shot (see below,
Faults), find they can do it more easily when they lead off
with the accented syllable and let all else follow as best
it can. It is sometimes so contrary to the natural way of
expressing the feeling embodied in the word, that even
after the accent has been established in its new place it
cannot retain it. When the writer was at school the accent
of acceptable was on the second syllable ; by-and-by it was
transferred to the first; and now it is back to the second.
We may add as to uncalled-for changes that the question
often presents itself whether their origin may not at times be
only some person's vanity, or ignorance, or accidental mistake.
The student has no better guide than the dictionaries,
to which we refer him again with the same suggestions as
F
80 SPEAKING.
before (p. 72). And we must add that on the very first
symptom of a change some of them seem to hasten to give it
preference, as if they would rather lead usage than record it.
Faults: (a) Some make a snap at an accented syllable
like the peck of a fowl hard and sharp.
(b) A great fault against which many must be warned is
uttering the unaccented syllables too lightly and rapidly, not
to say inaudibly. They speak as if the whole substance
of the word was in the accented syllable, or as if they
wished to deliver longer and shorter words in the same
space of time. Each word goes off like an unsuccessful
attempt to give the whole in a single sound or at a single
mouthful. It was but a few days ago that the writer heard
an absurdly exaggerated instance of this. The speaker
stepped from the accented syllable of one word to that of
the next in a way which vividly suggested his crossing a
ford on rather widely-set stepping-stones.
From Australia a friend in the legal profession writes
that the tendency to shorten words is such that no word of
more than one syllable is properly uttered and finished, and
one-syllable words are slurred or omitted. This, whatever
its extent, is much to be regretted. It is a frittering away
both of our language and of the human voice. How are the
greatest and best effects of speech to be produced with lang-
uage so stripped of substantial material for voicing ?
It cannot be stated with too much point and force that
(the proper sounds having been ascertained, compare p. 81)
every syllable must be distinctly uttered and heard, though
not by its being prolonged in-vi-si-bi-li-ty, with six syllables
all of the same sound ; co-op-er-a-tive-ness, with six syllables
all distinctly different in sound from one another. Words of
several syllables should be taken one by one and spoken first
deliberately with care to see that every syllable is distinctly
given, and then with every degree of rapidity, but with the
WORDS. 81
same sharp eye on the syllables. The same is true of little
words such as prepositions, the articles, &c. In the last
preaching we heard they had generally to be taken for
granted, even up to so large a word as that.
In the sound of i as in isle, indifferent speakers often
furnish an illustration of the undue prolonging of an un-
accented syllable; for example, in the first syllable of
gigantic and the third of civilisation. In such circum-
stances it seems a pet sound of theirs, and appears to be dwelt
on even more than when it is the only vowel-sound in a
word, as in fight. It should be true, but quite short.
(c) Akin to the last mentioned is the common habit of
neglecting or maltreating unaccented terminal syllables e.g.,
age, al, ance, ant, ate, ence, ent, est, tion, &c.
As always, the sound of the syllable in good usage is first
to be ascertained, and then given truly and distinctly, even
if lightly or shortly.
In el the vowel is to be dropped in certain words, but
generally it is retained, though not to be spoken obtrusively.
In en, on the other hand, e is generally dropped, and it
sounds harsh and illiterate to hear writ-ten, heav-en, and the
like. It is worse in certain words, as hasten, often, where I
also should be dropped. In past participles the e of en is
always dropped (just as the e of ed generally is when they
so end). The syllable rightly spoken is both more telling
and more euphonious without e than with it. See (3) N, p. 60.
In il, in, the vowel is retained, but not in evil, devil, raisin,
cousin.
For on the sound is un (p. 46) ; but many words drop the
vowel after c, It, d, p, s, t, or z, as in deacon, reason.
In tion, sion, om, the correct sound, u as in us, is often
faultily dropped, or supplanted by the i of ill.
The silence of a vowel must not be allowed to lessen
the care with which the consonant that follows is given.
82
PAET IV.
SENTENCES.
THERE is no occasion for defining a sentence : our purpose
being practical, we aim at speaking it. Hitherto we have
been acquiring the correct and easy utterance of sounds, now
we seek by their means the utterance of sense. We would
add to our present attainments the art of giving expression
to thought and feeling. To this end we employ sentences,
spoken with appropriate emphasis, inflexion, intonation,
movement.
Since we entered on Part II. we have been occupied with
the arbitrary and customary, for of this character are the
vowel sounds, articulations, words, and accents of any lan-
guage ; and accordingly in these things no two languages
agree. On the other hand, the matters which still remain
to be dealt with are common to all languages. They belong
not to the arbitrary, but to the natural ; and the nearer the
sounds of any language or the utterance of any speaker come
in the practice of them to universal nature, the greater are
the beauty and power. If we had to deal with the framing
of sentences, we should say that in so far as relates to gram-
matical structure we should still be occupied with the
arbitrary ; but that in regard, for example, to euphony,
sequence of thought, and the fitting of sound to thought
and feeling, we should be in the domain of the natural
SENTENCES. 83
We assume, however, that the pupil has been instructed in
the framing of sentences, and we are left to deal with what
is even more difficult, the speaking of them. Yet let it be
noted in passing that the better one knows how to, speak,
the better will he frame his sentences. "We are to deal
then with the natural And now will be put to the test
whether the counsels already given have been faithfully
followed ; for it is the sober, practical truth that without
such preparation what still remains to be done is impossible.
And, though it belongs to the natural, the student must
bear in mind that this does not in the least lessen the
necessity for still further laborious study and practice. If
the artificial must be acquired, the natural must be culti-
vated ; and this especially when we have to embody thought
and feeling in the framework of a language. Indeed, we
have not a single natural faculty or gift which can do its
work well without cultivation.
Kules for the doing of that which is natural can only be,
in so far as they are correct, statements of what has been
observed in nature. If one considers the infinite variety of
thoughts and feelings of every shade that have to be ex-
pressed in speech, and the variety of methods in combina-
tion, and in simultaneous action, by which this must be
done emphasis, inflexion, intonation, movement, &c. he
will see at a glance how easy it is to overburden both the
subject and the student with rules, and how impossible it is
to frame rules that can be useful, beyond such statements as
will direct the necessary attention to what is found in nature.
Nothing is so beautiful in speech as the art of giving to
every word and tone its proper character, importance, and
effect. But no rule, nor words of any kind, can describe, or
tell how to distribute, the innumerable, scarcely differing,
ever-changing degrees of pitch or force or movement, or the
finely-shaded varieties of tone. And even if all this could
84 SPEAKING.
be put before the mind's eye of the speaker that he might
copy it, he could not. No man can speak by rule ; and no
man has mastered any art until he can exercise it uncon-
scious of its rules, and oblivious of his early struggles.
The first essential for either good speaking or good reading
is a clear, lively, sensitive apprehension and appreciation of
the thought and feeling which the words are intended to
convey. The second is sympathy with the author of what
is read, and with the hearers, if it is read or spoken to them,
and not merely in their presence. The third is organs so
well cultivated, and so wedded to the service of the thoughts
and emotions, that they leap to discharge that service with
the mastery, freedom, and ease that come only from cultiva-
tion, and with the spontaneity, swiftness, and certainty of an
instinct.
The student must on no account allow himself for a con-
siderable time to be persuaded into reading for practice pieces
of continuous sentences. To this are directly attributable
almost all the faults of reading as such (that is, apart from
such things as untrained voice, or bad vowels or consonants)
which have come under the writer's notice. If the student
would make straight for good reading or speaking without
first acquiring habits which have to be unlearned, he must
begin with single, unconnected sentences, and these of only a
few words at first ; and must speak them naturally, address-
ing them to an imaginary hearer at various distances, looking
him in the face.
We shall best assist the student at this stage by direct-
ing his attention to some important elements in the natural
expression of thought and feeling, which from whatever
cause are apt to be disregarded in practice, or to miss their
place and their natural and intended effect.
SENTENCES. 85
EMPHASIS.
Emphasis is for sentences what accent is for words. But
its place is not fixed: it falls wherever the meaning re-
quires it. It is of every degree, from the most forceful
down to where it ceases to be called emphasis. It may he
on more parts of a sentence than one ; and on single words,
or on phrases, or on statements of some length. It is ex-
pressed in various ways singly and in combination force,
tone, time, pitch, pause, &c. \ and it is very rarely indeed
that a pounce, jerk, roar, or thump of the voice is admis-
sible. We must not think only of emphasis and non-em-
phasis. There is, though it may not all be easily detected,
in the words and parts of a well-spoken sentence every
degree and variety, from its most emphatic to its lightest
words.
Faults : (a) Confining emphasis to a word when it belongs
to a phrase or group of several words (p. 94). (b) Making it
mere force without the appropriate tone. These seem the
most common faults. Both were heard simultaneously just
before this was written. Referring to Christ, and intending
to say with emphasis, 'His terrible sufferings,' the speaker
emphasised only ' terrible/ and did so with a jerk on its
first syllable which might have been fitly accompanied by a
rap of the knuckles on a bare table, (c) Some have a most
objectionable habit of attacking all their sentences, and even
principal clauses, as they hit a ball, as if this initial impulse
were to carry them to the end, weakening as it goes.
INFLEXION.
Inflexion, and the manner of cultivating it, have already
been explained (p. 7) ; and now we treat of its applica-
tion. All the tones of natural speech, however brief,
86 SPEAKING.
are pronounced with inflexion. It abounds most in lively
conversation, less in reading or in repeating uneasily from
memory, and least when speech is with reverence or solem-
nity. Its use is determined not by the form of sentence, but
by the sense. The extent of the inflexion may be so little
as scarcely to be perceived, or it may sweep from the one
end of the scale to the other. The actual length, and the
exact pitch of its beginning, will depend on the purpose to
be served, and on the judgment and taste of the speaker and
his power of execution. The greater the sweep and force the
greater the effect. There is, of course, most body and force
in the beginning of an inflexion, for in its sweep it tapers off
to vanishing.
A rising inflexion begins below the speaker's previous note,
and rises above it ; and the more emphatic it is, the lower it
begins. A falling inflexion begins above the previous note,
and falls below it ; and the more emphatic it is, the higher it
begins. Nature will be found contributing to the pleasant-
ness and power of these inflexions when they are strong by
raising the said previous note when the inflexion is to begin
below it, and lowering it when the inflexion is to begin
above it.
That the lightest, briefest sound may be effectively in-
flected must be obvious to any one who has noticed and who
has not noticed ? the effect when a comment or the response
to some remark has been only the letter m well inflected.
In a word of more syllables than one the inflexion begins on
the accented syllable. If this is the last syllable, the execu-
tion will, of course, be the same as in a monosyllable ; but if
syllables follow the accented syllable, they are all swept into
the glide, which, so to speak, runs upwards on them or
downwards on them, as the case may be.
The falling inflexion gives point and force. It takes place
in the expression of conclusiveness, assertion, statement, dis-
SENTENCES. 87
pleasure, contempt, weighty command, weighty exhortation.
Of these last two it has to be said that grammatical form
must not be allowed to determine what is a command and
what an exhortation, or what inflexion is to be given to
either. ' Fear not/ ' Be of good cheer/ ' Be strong/ * Be not
deceived.' These are four exhortations in the grammatical
form of command : the first two naturally take the rising
inflexion, and the last two the falling. 'Be silent/ * Stand
still/ are two commands. If addressed to soldiers, both
would have the falling inflexion. If addressed to children,
the first would have the falling inflexion ; and so would the
second to a disobedient child, while to a willing child it
would almost certainly have the rising inflexion.
The rising inflexion takes place in the expression of inter-
rogation, uncertainty, diffidence, surprise, plaintiveness, pain,
appeal, admiration, tenderness; and in the progress of a
sentence it has a continuative effect that is, points to more
coming. For example, the following expressions introduc-
tory to something would have the rising inflexion : ' Well
then/ ' therefore/ * besides/ l they believe/ ' I wish to say/
It is used in the name or style of persons who are being
addressed.
There is a set of feelings which are better expressed by
another than either the rising or falling inflexion insinua-
tion, suspicion, derision, irony. The manner of inflecting
imparts to the speaker's language a meaning which the mere
words would not convey. In this case, whether it is the
rising or falling inflexion that would ordinarily fall to be
used, instead of going straight to its end, it makes in the
course of its progress a movement in the opposite direction
and back. It would be illustrated in the utterance of
' your ' in the exclamation * Your honour ! ' addressed to
one as a sneer at the peculiar quality of the honour which
characterised his dealings.
88 SPEAKING.
Faults : (a) A tendency, especially among young speakers,
to read too fast for proper inflexion, one result of which is
ineffectiveness. An opposite fault may be noted, though
perhaps rare in these days reading slowly along with defec-
tive inflexion, one result of which is oppressive monotony.
(b) Undue use of the rising inflexion as a continuative.
The blame is largely owing to the way in which this use of
it has been written of as if the inflection were always in
action unless the performer is to stop as if the sentence
would fall to pieces without it. Now, while it is true that no
sentence should fall to pieces, most sentences should be put in
pieces ; and this is prevented by the undue use of the rising
(continuative) inflexion, which destroys point and pith, and
produces lightness, and a feeling of jumbled particulars.
This is often aggravated by making this inflexion too great
as well as too frequent. Such faults are seen at their worst
when they occur in reading Scripture. We have in more
cases than one heard this exercise unintentionally made to
look as a light and jaunty performance. When words are
used which positively convey intimation of something to
follow, nature will call for this inflexion. But when nothing
more is wanted than to notify the audience that the end has
not come, nature can dispense with it ; and generally there is
more need to give attention to the advantage which is to be
gained in effectiveness by using the falling inflexion.
(c) An unaccountable error is taught by a living authority
that only questions which can be answered by ' Yes ' or
' No ' are asked in the rising inflexion. Thus, ' Do you see ] '
' Are you going ] ' take the rising inflexion ; but, ' What do
you see 1 ' t Where are you going 1 ' the falling inflexion. It
is very unlike nature to make this curious, arbitrary differ-
ence ; and indeed it does not, as any quick ear may learn
anywhere. And it is a familiar fact that even words which
have no interrogative meaning in themselves are made inter-
SENTENCES. 89
rogative by simply giving them the rising inflexion, as
* Well 1 ' meaning ' What have you got to say 1 ' ' He said no
more?' meaning 'What more did he say] Out with it.'
There need be no doubt nature interrogates in the rising
inflexion.
MODULATION.
Modulation is the term applied by art to the variation of
pitch by which nature modifies its address according to its
subject and mood. Nature not only inflects individual tones,
but also clauses, sentences, and passages. It will not in the
same pitch or manner describe soldiers charging and children
playing, or a meeting with a friend and a struggle with a
burglar, or repeat words of lament and of congratulation,
or the speeches of Joseph and the replies of his brethren on
their visits to Egypt. It would not with the same pitch and
manner give the voice of them that shout for the mastery
and of them that cry for being overcome ; or the words of
the two men who went up to the temple to pray ; or a fin-
ancial statement and a vigorous argument; or a hearty
exhortation and a melting appeal. And if it should inter-
polate an ' aside/ or a few words of reminiscence or explana-
tion, it would not be in the same pitch as the rest of the
sentence.
Modulation is the main agent in distinguishing a parenthesis
from its context in spoken language. The parenthesis is in
a somewhat different pitch, and a little faster or slower as the
case may be. Ordinarily it is begun in a lower pitch and
ends with the rising inflexion. Beginners ought, perhaps,
to be warned against too great lowering of pitch. The
change ought to be distinctly felt by the hearer, but more
than this may cause difficulty to the speaker. (See illus-
trations of parentheses, p. 107.)
Faults: Underdone, overdone, absurdly done caused
90 SPEAKING.
by imperfect mastery of the voice, or want of sound taste
and judgment, or incorrect apprehension of the sense and
feeling.
INTONATION.
If appropriate tone is not technically an essential part of
modulation, it is, in nature's voice at least, inseparable from
it. The necessity of suitable tone, and the infinite variety
and delicate shading of it, may be best illustrated by setting
down for comparison brief sentences which manifestly de-
mand to be spoken more or less differently. The natural
faculty for this requires as much cultivation as any that has
been under consideration. The correct discernment of the
thought and feeling depends so much on the context that
the following illustrations are taken (sometimes abbreviated)
from the most widely-known volume, and references given :
What aileth thee, Hagar ? fear not (Gen. xxi.)
What wilt thou, queen Esther, and what is thy request ? (Esth. v.)
What doest thou here, Elijah ? (1 Kings xix. )
Wilt thou kill me as thou killedst the Egyptian ? (Ex. ii.)
What meaneth this bleating of the sheep in mine ears ? (1 Sam. xv.)
Are not Abana and Pharpar better than all the rivers of Israel ? (2
Kings v.)
If he had bidden thee do some great thing, wouldst thou not have
done it? (2 Kings v.)
Is thy servant a dog, that he should do this thing ? (2 Kings viii.)
Shall he break the covenant, and be delivered ? (Ezek. xvii.)
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth '{ (Job
xxxviii.)
Behold, I am vile : what shall I answer Thee ? (Job xl.)
foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you ? (Gal. iii.)
Jesus I know, and Paul I know, but who are ye ? (Ac. xix. )
Sirs, what must I do to be saved ? (Ac. xvi.)
Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries ? (Jas. iii.)
Can a devil open the eyes of the blind ? (Jn. ix.)
Who is sufficient for these things ? (2 Cor. ii.)
Who then can be saved ? (Matt, xix.)
What went ye out for to see ? (Matt, xi.)
SENTENCES. 91
What accusation bring ye against this man ? (Jn. xviii.)
Who is he that will harm you ? (1 Pet. iii.)
If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee ? (Jn. xxi.)
Who will say unto Him, What doest Thou ? (Job ix. )
What is that to us ? See thou to that (Matt, xxvii. )
Art Thou come to torment us before the time ? (Matt, viii.)
Why will ye die, house of Israel ? (Ezek. xxxiii.)
Will ye also go away ? (Jn. vi.)
Is His mercy clean gone for ever ? (Ps. Ixxvii.)
Shall the enemy blaspheme Thy name for ever? (Ps. Ixxiv.)
How long shall I suffer you ? (Matt. xvii. )
What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart ? (Ac. xxi.)
When saw we Thee hungry and fed Thee ? (Matt, xxv.)
When saw we Thee an hungred and did not minister unto Thee ?
(Matt, xxv.)
I cannot hold my peace ( Jer. iv. )
For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace (Is. Ixii.)
Hold your peace, let me alone (Job xiii.)
Speak, Lord, for Thy servant heareth (1 Sam. iii.)
Come in, thou blessed of the Lord (Gen. xxiv. )
I will not let thee go, except thou bless me (Gen. xxxii.)
Come now, and let us reason together (Is. i.)
And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man (2 Sam. xii.)
And they all wept sore (Ac. xx. )
They rejoiced with exceeding great joy (Matt, ii.)
When he saw him he passed by on the other side (Luke x.)
When he saw him he had compassion on him (Luke x.)
Thou shalt not kill (Ex. xx.)
Thou shalt never wash my feet ( Jn. xiii. )
I will lay down my life for Thy sake ( Jn. xiii. )
And he went out and wept bitterly (Matt, xxvi.)
There is none that doeth good, no, not one (Ps. xiv.)
Oh that my people had hearkened unto me ! (Ps. Ixxxi.)
how love I Thy law ! (Ps. cxix. )
wretched man that I am ! (Ro. vii. )
Bless me, even me also, my father (Gen. xxvii.)
Do thyself no harm : for we are all here (Ac. xvi. )
Fear not, for I have redeemed thee (Is. xliii. )
Quit you like men, be strong (1 Cor. xvi.}
Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter (Ac. viii.)
There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matt, viii.)
God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes (Rev. xxi.)
Master, master, we perish (Luke viii.)
92 SPEAKING.
They shall never perish (Jn. x.)
The Lord bless thee and keep thee (Num. vi.)
Entreat me not to leave thee (Ruth i. )
Would God I had died for thee, Absalom, my son, my son
(2 Sam. xviii.)
If Thou wilt, Thou canst make me clean (Mark i.)
I will ; be thou clean (Mark i.)
Arise up quickly (Ac. xii.)
Arise, take up thy bed, and walk (Mark ii. )
Let them be turned back that say, Aha, aha (Ps. Ixx.)
He warmeth himself, and saith, Aha, I am warm (Is. xliv. )
Brother Saul, receive thy sight (Ac. xxii.)
Away with him (Ac. xxi. )
Paul, much learning hath made thee mad (Ac. xxvi.)
I am not mad, most noble Festus (Ac. xxvi. )
King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets ? (Ac. xxvi.)
I know that thou believest (Ac. xxvi.)
If Christ be not risen, your faith is vain (1 Cor. xv.)
But now is Christ risen from the dead (1 Cor. xv.)
grave, where is thy victory ? (1 Cor. xv.)
Thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory (1 Cor. xv. )
We should be the last to encourage reading dramatically,
or playing the elocutionist ; but there is a wide difference
between that and reading so as to convey the full meaning, and
the feeling is part of the meaning. For example, one has only
to think how many different degrees of thankfulness he has
heard expressed by the different tones put into the simple
words, ' thank you.' For this kind of reading or speaking
a glance at even so small a number of sentences as the fore-
going (no two of them alike) will show the absolute necessity
of a voice made thoroughly flexible by practice and controlled
by judgment and taste. That the tone may be really true,
this equipment should be accompanied by a quality of mind
and speech for which we know no better term than frankness.
Faults: These remarks will sufficiently suggest the char-
acter and cause of faults. But we may mention having
heard many who are neither absurd nor extravagant, and
indeed in their own opinion are doing exceedingly well,
SENTENCES. 93
when in fact, from very imperfect self -education and dis-
cipline, part of their modulation and intonation never escapes
from the mouth, and part never exists but in their im-
agination.
MOVEMENT.
We use this word as summarily embracing better than any
other the remaining points that may be thought to deserve
attention here.
Rhythm is produced by the selection and arrangement of
words so that accented syllables by occupying certain positions
make the passage more or less effective in speech and more or
less pleasant to hear. Vowel sounds also have some share in
this. Poetry presents most rhythm, and in a poem rhythm
is uniform. In prose it must not be uniform. This subject
is rather for the composer than for the speaker ; but he who
speaks best will in this respect compose best though, on the
other hand, one may compose well and utterly fail in speak-
ing. In poetry the good speaker will neither make the
rhyme overshadow the sense nor the sense disturb the rhyme,
but will make both tell, and make each assist the other.
Cadence, if it has more meaning than modulation, must
have it by embracing something of that which is supplied by
rhythm. Men may be found concerned about their cadence
who ought to be occupied in acquiring some of the first
elements of good speaking.
Motion the rate and manner of progression must differ
along with the character of the subject ; and also, though
the subject should be the same, with the degree and kind of
effect which the speaker intends, as by slow and measured
words and sentences, or otherwise. Within limits in either
direction which are obvious to common sense, motion is of
every degree, and in its finer degrees may be almost always
varying. At times it will gradually quicken slightly, as
94 SPEAKING.
towards the end of a series set forth under feeling. But it is
always to be borne in mind that only the expert should
observe what is happening : the ordinary hearer should only
feel the naturalness and the power. If it were necessary to
suggest illustrations of the necessity of difference in the rate
and manner of progression (which would of course be accom-
panied by proper intonation, already considered), we might
point to the ' Lays of Ancient Rome ' and the ' Burial of Sir
John Moore/ to the Ten Commandments, the various parts
of the picture of the Last Judgment in Matt xxv., the
triumphal song of Moses, Paul's speech before Agrippa, the
various parts of Rom. viii. and of 1 Cor. xv. ; but illustra-
tions are everywhere.
Phrasing, or grouping of words, may fitly be noticed under
this heading. It practically amounts to this, that where
more words than one are used to present a single object, or
concept, or picture, they are treated in speaking as if they
were one word ; or, put conversely, single objects, or concepts,
or pictures are to be given with individual distinctness suffi-
cient for clear and easy sequence of thought in the hearer.
' House/ ' couch/ ' book/ ' sand/ ' hungry/ ' days/ ' afraid/
are not more distinct individual concepts than ' half-a-dozen
houses on the green/ ' he lay helpless on the couch/ ' a pile
of valuable books/ ' the sand which is upon the sea-shore/
'I was an hungred/ 'not many days after/ 'they were sore
afraid.' The grammatical pointing by commas is not to be
taken as the rule in this, or in pausing (see below).
It must not be imagined that the grouped words are to be
crammed together or spoken rapidly. This would destroy
instead of securing the vivid clearness intended. It is not
thus that the grouping is effected, but in various ways so
intangible that they can hardly be described, such as a
degree (perhaps infinitesimal) of pause, which yet is not a
lifeless pause, and by management of the voice felt but
SENTENCES. 95
unseen by the ordinary hearer. Perhaps the whole may be
best expressed by saying that the group receives the same
treatment of voice as a single word would in its place.
Pausing : If so-called pausing is not of every degree from
the most pronounced which is allowable down to nothing,
the reading or speaking is not good. The truth is that, on
the one hand, what in common language would be called
a pause, though effective when well placed, does not occur
often ; and, on the other, what the word means as applied
to speech would generally be more correctly thought of rather
as a throb of time and thought, and requires as quick and
true insight and as delicate touch as anything in speech.
We confess to a little impatience with the manner in which
some teachers and many pupils speak of this action in speech
as if it were always only an obvious stoppage which the
commonest performer could execute. In this light the
pupil's great interest in it is intelligible, for one who can do
nothing else can at least stop. We knew one who stopped
after every few words with the certainty of a metronome and
almost with its click ; and we know of another who seems
incapable of anything else, and stops instead of doing some-
thing else, in season and out of season. If such methods
have any good effect on a strange audience, it is certain they
lose it on an accustomed audience, and the last-mentioned
trick becomes an irritant.
An appropriate pause will call special attention to that
which is next to be said, but not unless the hearer feels that
the speaker knows what he is to say and feels its import-
ance. A little pause after as well as before a saying may
give it still more weight. A degree of pause may also
indicate the coming of something unexpected oftenest, we
think, unhappy, as that which we would rather not say. He
went 'into a far country, and there wasted,' &c. Nature
would dictate a little hanging after 'and,' amounting to
G
96 SPEAKING.
scarcely more than a perceptible dwelling on the nd of 'and.'
The tone also of ' and ' itself would be slightly premonitory
of ill. Again, the slightest pause, indeed scarcely so much a
pause as a certain touch of the voice, may be necessary to
give the meaning. Thus, ' not many days after he took his
journey ' might be read to mean ' after he took his journey/
To prevent this we must treat ' after ' with the touch just
referred to. Let it be repeated that this so-called pausing is
not a mere piece of vacant time. The throb of intellectual
and emotional life never ceases either in speaker or hearer, is
indeed quicker than at many other times. When to pause
and how to pause can hardly be taught to one who has not
the instinct of the speaker ; but intelligent study helps, as
in most things.
SENTENCE STUDIES.
We propose now to examine a few sentences after the
manner of one who would prepare to speak them properly,
directing attention to such things as might be found diffi-
cult, or might be overlooked. The selection is made from
the Authorised Version of Scripture, both because it should
above all books be well read, and because we consider it to
be the best existing English. It need hardly be said, how-
ever, that the best sentences have not been sought out (as
seems to be usual in books on this subject), but those which
may best educate the student. While it is probable that
the interpretations given will be generally accepted, our
object is not to lay down the law, but, as has been said,
to educate.
God said, Let there be light : and there was light (Gen. i.)
A writer already referred to says that in the latter part of
this the weight of voice should not be on 'was,' as is usual,
but on 'light.' Most minds will reject this for excellent
SENTENCES. 97
natural reasons, (a) When the first part has been told, the
attitude of the hearer is, ' And was there light 1 ' the answer
to which is ' There was light/ (b) The simple emphatic
verb brings out that the task was completely and instantly
accomplished, (c) Subsequent verses are expressed in the
same form, but in reading * and it was so ' no one would put
the emphasis on 'so.' In like manner at verse 11, 'Let
the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed,' &c., the
words after ' brought forth ' reject emphasis ; most effect is
due to 'the earth brought forth' the earth did as it was
bid. (d) 'The officer said to his men, "Take the heights,"
and they took the heights ' : only one reading would be
tolerated here. So, ' Jesus said unto him, " Be thou clean " ;
and he was clean.'
In short, we do not doubt that the proper reading of
' was light ' is to give both words expressively, and ' was '
with more weight than 'light.'
Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, be-
cause they are not (Matt, ii.) Joseph is not, and Simeon is not, and
ye will take Benjamin away (Gen. xlii.)
A similar question might arise here. Greater weight of
voice is usually and rightly put upon 'are' and 'is' than on
the 'not.' To emphasise 'not' is to make an emphatic
denial ; but here grief is simply mourning absence. The
two words form a single sad expression, the first part of
which bears the greater share of expressiveness.
If I be bereaved of my children, I am bereaved (Gen. xliii.)
Here also in the last two words the greater emphasis is on
* am.' No emphasis on the last word alone, or principally,
could give to it an expression which would make it more
than a meaningless repetition. The meaning is, ' I am, really,
at the heart, beyond all utterance, bereaved.' Nor is the
98 SPEAKING.
' am ' without some reference to ' if.' ' Children ' should be
impressively speken.
He hath chosen the foolish things to confound the wise ; and the
weak things to confound the things that are mighty ; and things which
are not, to bring to nought things that are (1 Cor. L, abbreviated).
How is the last section to be read ? Try an experiment
thus, ' Things which are foolish, things which are wise;
things which are weak, things which are strong; things
which are not.' The first four times 'are' is certainly light ;
if we make it so the next time, some adjective would be
expected to follow, or is implied, as ' things which are not '
(weak), 'things which are not' (strong). Again, the first
four times ' are ' predicates certain qualities of existing
things ; the next time existence itself is in question, and
to express non-existence the word 'not' is but a qualifier
of the word ' are,' and the denial of existence does not
require to be emphatic. We conclude to read ' are not '
as one phrase with the principal weight on 'are.'
I will go down now, and see whether, &c. (Gen. xviii.)
It is better here almost to disregard the comma, give some
emphasis to ' see,' and follow it by a slight pause. In the
rest of this chapter the successive appeals of Abraham try
the reader, to give them truly and with due restraint. He
deepens in humility, is more and more held back by fear of
venturing too far, yet by increasing earnestness and longing
is actually driven nearer and nearer.
Hast thou here any besides ? son in law, and thy sons, and thy
daughters, and whatsoever thou hast in the city, bring them out of
this place (Gen. xix.)
' Son in law,' ' sons/ ' daughters ' may be read interrogat-
ively as an extension by particulars of the general question,
and as saying 'What of them?' Or they may more
properly be read as a statement of particulars, connected
SENTENCES. 99
with the summation ' whatsoever,' which must be brought
out of the place. Certainly this ' whatsoever ' clause must
be a firmly and conclusively expressed address.
But he seemed as one that mocked unto his sons in law (Gen. xix.)
This has to be read so that ' seemed/ and not ' mocked/
shall connect with ' sons in law/ This will be done by
giving the falling (concluding) inflection to ' mocked/ and
following it by a slight pause.
But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar
of salt (Gen. xix.)
Care must be taken not to emphasise the last three words.
The pitch should be slightly lower after ' him. 7 c And '
should be felt premonitory of ill, its concluding letters
slightly dwelt on, and followed by a slight pause the sub-
sequent words being read evenly.
And he looked . . . toward all the land of the plain, and beheld,
and, lo, the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace
(Gen. xix.)
Guard against paltry emphasising of single words. ' The
smoke of the country ' and ' the smoke of a furnace J are
each a single expression, and to be spoken as such. We
almost fear to refer often to pausing, for in truth what is
meant is seldom properly a pause, but rather as it were a
throb of time and thought, and almost voice. This should
follow both < beheld ' and ' lo.'
And Abraham said, My son, God will provide Himself a lamb for a
burnt offering (Gen. xxii.)
* My ' here is neither strong nor light, but medium
certainly not the sound of i in ill. The two words are full
of love and tenderness. The rest is spoken not as if he had
any thought of his son being spared, nor in strained or loud-
voiced trust in God ; but in deeply felt willingness to leave
100 SPEAKING.
himself and his son in God's hands feeling that to be a lamb
provided by God for Himself is to be precious in His sight.
Now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld
thy son, thine only son from me (Gen. xxii.)
The so-called pause throb of time and voice should
precede and follow i thine only son.' ' Only son ' is one ex-
pression to be given with some weight, which is principally
on * only.'
Beware thou that thou bring not my son thither again (Gen. xxiv.)
The occurrence of the first * thou ' shows anxiety and the
pointedness of the charge and is followed by the so-called
pause. * My son ' is a single expression, both parts of
which are in the same voice. ' My,' as before explained, is
medium.
The voice is Jacob's voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau
(Gen. xxvii.)
There is not emphasis on the second ' voice ' and ' hands,'
but on the first and on the names.
Art thou my very son Esau ? (Gen. xxvii.)
* Thou ' may or may not be emphasised, but the words
' my very son ' are to be given with anxious distinctness
and deliberateness, and with equal weight.
He cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and said unto his
father, Bless me, even me also, my father (Gen. xxvii.)
The description of the cry should of course be with sym-
pathy, with somewhat slower motion and in a pitch slightly
above what the speaker has been using. The five words
that follow ' cry ' are more ordinary. Then in the appeal
(again raised in pitch) ' me ' and ' me also ' are touchingly
emphatic, and * my father ' is in somewhat lower pitch
but with no less voice.
SENTENCES. 101
This is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of
heaven (Gen. xxviii. )
Some might emphasise * God ' and ' heaven/ It is doubt-
less better to take ' house of God ' and ' gate of heaven ' as
single expressions.
With my staff I passed over this Jordan ; and now I am become two
bands (Gen. xxxii.)
There should be no special emphasis on ' staff ' in addition
to what it takes from its position in the sentence, but * my
staff ' are to be read together, much as if it were l my all. '
* And ' and ' now ' should be given distinctively, each with
a slight dwelling on its final sound, and ' now ' in a slightly
lower pitch and with feeling. < Two bands ' are spoken
together and alike, with pondering, thankful expressiveness,
but without jerky emphasis.
I fear him lest he will come and smite me, and the mother with the
children (Gen. xxxii.)
The sense must first be settled, and this no doubt is, lest
he rout me, not sparing even mothers and children. To
emphasise * me/ or in any way make it personal as distin-
guished from c mother and child/ would be an unjust inter-
pretation ; ' with the mother and the children ' should be read
as an adverbial qualification of c smite me/ and will have a
slightly lower pitch.
And Jacob was left alone ; and there wrestled a man with him until
the breaking of the day. (25) And when he saw that he prevailed not
against him, he touched the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of
Jacob's thigh was out of joint as he wrestled with him. (26) And he
said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he said, I will not let
thee go except thou bless me. (27) And he said unto him, What is
thy name ? And he said, Jacob. (28) And he said, Thy name shall be
called no more Jacob, but Israel (Gen. xxxii. 24-28).
When two persons are repeatedly referred to as ' he/ the
manner of distinguishing them is by making that word
shorter and longer, or perhaps lighter and heavier. A little
102 SPEAKING.
examination will show that when one person is prominently
before the mind as the principal subject, his l he ' or ' him '
is given short witness all the preceding part of this chapter
in its references to Jacob ; also that when the positions of ' he '
for different persons are so close and apposite as ' he asked '
and 'he replied,' the second is the heavier. But notwith-
standing such points of guidance from nature or custom,
there may be difficulty in seeing how to make the necessary
distinction, as in the present passage.
It will be found that in this passage the sense is best
brought out, and the treatment easiest and most consistent,
by taking the ' man ' to be, as indeed he is, the most out-
standing personage. The first five times c he ' refers to him,
and is given short. The next refers to Jacob (introducing
his answer), and is long. The next (27) refers to the man,
and is short ; and the next to Jacob (introducing an answer
again), and is long. The next (28) refers to the man, and is
short.
Them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with Him (1 Thess. iv.)
' Him ' refers to Jesus, and for this meaning requires some
weight.
And the children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites, . . . and
they took their daughters to be their wives, and gave their daughters
to their sons, and served their gods (Judg. iii. 5, 6).
The reader having with ordinary expression read ' their
daughters ' will, on its recurrence with reference to others,
instinctively make a difference, and this will naturally be
done by putting weight on ' their.' For the rest it will be
found that nothing is gained by attempting to distinguish
between the other uses of that word.
And they dreamed a dream both of them, each man his dream in
Due night (Gen. xl.)
What would be the best way of reading this to exclude most
SENTENCES. 103
surely the thought that both had the same dream 1 To con-
nect ' each man his dream ' with what precedes, and not with
what follows. This would give the meaning that they
dreamed each man his dream, with the additional informa-
tion that both happened in one night ; otherwise it would be
more liable to appear as if they both had the same dream,
and on the same night.
His bowels did yearn upon his brother ; and he sought where to
weep ; and he entered into his chamber, and wept there (Gen. xliii.)
Some might be led to emphasise the last word ; but there
is really nothing in the where. The matter of interest is
Joseph's bursting heart, and his haste to hide his head
somewhere. 'Wept there' should be one expression, the
words of about equal weight, and suggesting a scene of
secret weeping from an overwhelmed heart.
We have a father, an old man, and a child of his old age, a little
one ; and his brother is dead, and he alone is left of his mother, and
his father loveth him (Gen. xliv.)
There must be no hastening to the words which follow ' a
father/ or * age ' ; they will in both cases be in a slightly
lower pitch, and they give expression to touching points.
* His ' with l brother ' (and again with ' mother ') must be
without emphasis or effort, but yet be well brought out.
' Left ' should, for obvious reason, be taken with the words
preceding it; * mother ' should have no emphasis; 'father'
and ' loveth ' should be given alike.
The lad cannot leave his father ; for if he should leave his father,
his father would die (Gen. xliv.)
The first two parts are not to be pitted against each other
in any way. The effective words are the same in both,
'leave his father.' The last part will be slightly lower in
pitch, but not less in power.
104 SPEAKING.
Which of you, by taking thought, can add one cubit to his stature \
(Matt, vi.)
'By taking thought' should be made to stand out, but
scarcely by what is ordinarily understood as emphasis.
Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow (Matt, vi.)
To emphasise ' they ' would make comparison with the
growth of his hearers ; to emphasise ' grow ' would make
comparison with some other quality of the lily. The prin-
cipal emphasis is on 'how/ in which lie the mystery and
the evidence of care and wisdom and power. On ' grow '
there is scarcely more emphasis than falls to it as the final
sound of the sentence.
Do men gather grapes of thorns or figs of thistles ? (Matt, vii.)
This should be read as two questions the rising inflexion
for 'thorns ' as well as 'thistles.'
I never knew you : depart from Me, ye that work iniquity
(Matt, vii.)
Emphasis might be put on ' I ' or on ' you,' but not on
both. It would seem best to put just a little on 'I/ and
the suggestion of it on 'you.'
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew
and beat upon that house ; and it fell : and great was the fall of it
(Matt, vii.)
The nominative and its verb here are to be spoken together
and alike. There should be no hasting from the one of these
many pictures to the other. ' Blew and beat ' should not be
read as one expression ; ' beat ' alone connects with ' that
house,' but the throb of time after ' blew ' should be rather
less of a pause than is between the other pictures. ' It
fell' will be at a slightly lower pitch; and what follows,
lower still ; but if the reader has not made preparation
for this, he had better do anything than get into bathoa
or THE
UNIVERSITY )j
OF SENTENCES. 105
jro^T^^
Speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed (Matt, viii.)
6 Word ' should not be singled out by emphasis, nor ' word
only ' ; but ' speak the word/ in a piece, gives the centurion's
mind.
The Son of man hath not where to lay His head (Matt, viii.)
* Head ' should not be emphasised, as if distinguishing it
from something else ; but ' lay his head ' is one expression.
And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country, and he
sent him into his fields to feed swine (Luke xv.)
Another illustration of our remarks on ' he ' : the first, re-
ferring to the son, is short, the other long. A so-called
pause, a throb of time, after ' fields ' would be natural.
Lo, these many years do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any
time thy commandment ; and yet thou never gavest me a kid that I
might make merry with my friends : but as soon as this thy son was
come, which hath devoured thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for
him the fatted calf (Luke xv.)
Nature would emphasise the first * I/ and in a less
degree the whole statement down to ' and ' ; then all the
following words : < me,' ' kid,' I,' < my/ < him,' ' fatted calf ' ;
and the character given to the prodigal would be in a tone
severely bringing out the fancied injustice.
For this thy brother was dead and is alive again, and was lost and is
found (Luke xv.)
1 Thy brother 7 should be brought out distinctively and
tenderly ; c was dead ' and ' was lost/ also distinctively, and
with the conclusive effect of the falling inflexion, and a
sense of sad importance.
I am not mad, most noble Festus (Ac. xxvi.)
' Not mad ' was spoken doubtless with evenness and
composure, after the manner of a man with whom the im-
portance of the strange things he had been saying, and the
106 SPEAKING.
desire to have them believed, overruled everything the
manner of an honest man seriously giving assurance (and
competent to give assurance) of the true state of the case
aiming also to dispel all thought of madness which would
make his words of no account.
If God be for us, who can be against us ? (Ro. viii. )
The following words must be brought out well and
thoughtfully, but not with mere jerky emphasis : 'God/
4 for,' 'who/ 'against. 7
How shall He not with Him also freely give us all things ? (Ro. viii.)
'With Him' is to be brought out distinctively, by a
throb of time before and after it. 'Also' goes with what
follows.
Who shall separate us from the love of God ? shall tribulation, or
distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword ?
(Ro. viii.)
These particulars are spoken each as a question, and there
will be a slight acceleration of motion and accession of
feeling from about ' famine ' to the end of ' peril/ ' Sword '
will commence lower, both because it is the last word, and
still more because its interrogative rising inflection should be
a decisive one. ' Or ' will be somewhat higher, preparatory
to the lower beginning of ' sword/
I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor
height, nor depth, nor any other creature shall be able, &c. (Ro. viii.)
These particulars are each spoken with firm conclusiveness.
Naturally they go in twos, except 'angels, principalities,
powers.' Both motion and feeling and force will slightly
increase towards the end. ' Any ' is slightly down, rising to
' other,' which is rather above the general tone, that the fall
on the final ' creature ' may be the more effective. But there
must be no suggestion of haste.
SENTENCES. 107
Now this, I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the
kingdom of God (1 Cor. xv.)
The force of the statement is in the absolute incompati-
bility of the materials of flesh and blood with the kingdom
of God. This therefore is what the reader has to endeavour
to convey ; and it cannot be done merely by the manner of
speaking the i cannot/
death, where is thy sting ? grave, where is thy victory ? . . .
Thanks be to God which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus
Christ (1 Cor. xv.)
Clearly to get the full value of this, there should be
emphasis on 'us.'
The words 'Holy, holy, holy' should be spoken with
increasing reverence.
For the reading of parentheses (p. 89), the illustrations
following may afford useful suggestions.
A typical instance of parenthetical matter, though not
shown by a bracket, is seen in John xiv. 22, 'not Iscariot.'
In Heb. xi. 38, * Of whom the world was not worthy ' is, we
think, best concluded, not as is usual in a parenthesis, but
with the falling inflexion. It is an affirmation firmly made
of one more fact about the persons in that roll of honour.
A parenthesis may be so long that it cannot be read dis-
tinctively as such :
Heb. xii. 20 : ' For they could not endure/ &c. This is not
very difficult, and we quote it to point out that for the expres-
sion of the sense it is not necessary to read it as a parenthesis.
Heb. iii. 7 : ' As the Holy Ghost saith, To-day,' &c. Here
nearly five verses of a Psalm are quoted in a bracket, and
the manner of reading a parenthesis could not be maintained
throughout ; but considering the nature of its connection with
that which precedes and follows, there is obviously no need
to attempt such a reading.
108 SPEAKING.
Heb. iv. 7 : c Again He limiteth a certain day,' c. The
concluding of this parenthesis, and the beginning of what
follows, need not cause anxiety ; not only because the con-
nection between themselves is natural, but the latter con-
tains actual words for the purpose of resuming the main
argument. But it is quite different with the beginning of
the parenthesis. It breaks into the middle of a sentence at
a most unexpected point, with no connection of grammar or
immediately perceivable meaning. Unless, therefore, one
would make the reading appear as nonsense, his manner
must mark the transition best done, apparently, by a slight
check where the verse is broken, and a somewhat lower
pitch for the beginning of the parenthesis. For the rest,
no attempt need be made.
Rom. ii. 13 : 'For not the hearers of the law are just,' &c.
This is the opposite of last case, in that the beginning of it
connects naturally with what precedes, while there is no
connection between its conclusion and what follows; and
further, what precedes has the form of a statement which
awaits no continuation after the parenthesis, and the con-
tinuation which actually comes does not contain one word
to lead back to what precedes. This is very difficult to
read so as to bring that which follows the parenthesis into
connection with what precedes it. The best course will be
found to be to read what precedes in a well-sustained voice
and conclude it with the rising inflexion : begin the paren-
thesis in a somewhat lower pitch, ending it also with the
rising inflexion, and resume what follows in the voice and
manner that had gone before.
Kois. v. 13 : 'For until the law sin was in the world,' &c.
The conclusion runs easily into what follows, nor does the
beginning start abruptly or unconnectedly from what precedes.
No attempt should be made to read it as a parenthesis, but
we should pass to the parenthesis from what precedes it in
SENTENCES. 109
the manner one would naturally use if it were not a paren-
thesis.
In our illustrations such a word as 'slightly' or Some-
what ' may have been used when on the one hand it might
have been omitted, or on the other an expression of a little
more strength used, if it had existed. Let it be understood
we have sought to err on that which would be the safest
side for the awkward. But it need hardly be said that
any change of pitch or intonation must be such as to be felt
by the hearer or it is useless. It is impossible to define
degrees by words. We are, as has been said, only trying to
direct attention to nature that it may be permitted to speak
for itself.
It is to be regretted that our national temperament and
manners or customs should have so completely robbed us of
essential and beautiful elements of good speech which we
had by nature in childhood ; and it is strange that the
recovery of them should be so difficult to many, largely
owing to a stolid, though it may be unconscious, resistance.
If one would hear the tones appropriate to the various
emotions, and the fine effect of true modulation, let him
listen to a child. It has had no teaching and needs none ;
yet in every nation and kindred and tongue it utters without
fault the tones that express pain, anger, pity, love, joy,
expectation, disappointment the whole gamut of feeling.
With this in mind it is pitiful to find the elaborate details
for at least all the principal emotions which some books
think it necessary to present.
One word more before we proceed to the platform : he
who would speak well in public must be careful to speak
well in private with distinct articulation and true vowel
sounds, with a frank and natural voice, and with the word g
that most exactly express his meaning.
110
PAET V.
PUBLIC SPEAKING.
THE pupil, having reached this stage, must be regarded as
fully accoutred, and with every weapon ready to his hand.
But all will be vain unless there is breathed into him a
living soul. He must have something to say which he feels
to be important, which he is heartily purposed to say, and
as to which he will spare no pains to bring his audience to
the same mind as himself. When a speaker is unfavourably
criticised as speaking for effect, the meaning must be that he
speaks for some effect relative to his own personality, or for
present impression or excitement with too little regard for
lasting good ; because every true man is bound to speak for
effect in the sense of producing some high and good and
lasting effect, and in this light it is commendation to say
that he speaks for effect. There is frivolous speech-making,
of which we take no account here. Nor do our words apply
to the actor or the reciter, both of whom must be distin-
guished from the speaker.
ACTOR, KECITER, SPEAKER.
The actor's part and the speaker's are essentially different.
The actor never addresses his audience, the speaker always
does. Further, the speaker describes a villain or a piece of
PUBLIC SPEAKING. Ill
villainy, the actor becomes for the time himself a villain ;
the speaker tells of the home-coming of the prodigal, the
actor becomes the prodigal, and in all his rags and misery
rushes into his father's arms. Again, the actor's perform-
ances appeal to the imagination, the emotions, the passions ;
the speaker seeks to reach the reason, the conscience, the
will. The simple statement of the positions is sufficient to
show how unreflecting, how absurd, it is to put them in
comparison in order to compliment or discredit the one or
the other by pointing to the effect produced at the time
even if (as is rarely done) persons of equal power and emin-
ence in the two professions were taken. The well-worn
saying, that the actor produces his greater momentary effect
because he speaks fiction as if it were truth, would be easily
tested by putting him on the speaker's platform and giving
him truth to speak to the audience instead of fiction in their
presence. Doubtless the speaker may get hints from the
actor, as the actor from the speaker, and as every man in
earnest about anything gets hints on all sides ; but let no
one suppose that studying the stage will make a speaker
of him. No great actor has been also a great speaker.
The part of the reciter or elocutionist is almost as different
from the speaker's in that which is essential as the actor's
has proved to be. The elocutionist, as the appellation is
ordinarily understood, does not address his audience, but
exhibits in presence of it in his own way as the actor does
in his. Further, if he does not, like the actor, actually im-
personate a character, or present a material scene, he does
his best to compensate through the imagination by every
suggestion of voice and manner to such an extent that we
but lately heard a teacher of elocution absurdly attempt to
give his audience the impression of a thunder - storm by a
prodigious uproar of voice. Again, in the direct effect
designed on the hearer, he is obviously more akin to the
H
112 SPEAKING.
actor than to the speaker, and cannot ordinarily be said to
seek to reach the reason and conscience and will, but to give
pleasure. The practical test also is testimony to the differ-
ence of the two parts ; for though there may be a rare ex-
ception, the elocutionist generally is not a good speaker.
And it is more easy to imagine than to describe the effect
on a political meeting or a congregation, if it were addressed
after the manner of the elocutionist. The two may learn
from one another. But it is a delusion and a snare for any
one to imagine that he will be trained for public speaking
by the recital of foreign matter, or by imitative elocution.
In the light of these things the student will better per-
ceive the importance of what is stated in the first para-
graph of this Part. And now we proceed to matters more
immediately connected with the addressing of a public
audience.
PREPARATION FOR AN ADDRESS.
He must have a very peculiar mind, and is most likely a
poor speaker, who does not, in the first place, line out his
matter consecutively, and then give it body and life
modifying the course laid out, if necessary.
The beginner must resolutely apply himself to do this in
writing thoroughly and well And he must work doggedly.
It is very painful to hear of youths who can content them-
selves with a single cursory scribble ; but it affords an easy
explanation of the effect on their audience. He must also
as every one who writes must write with his audience as
consciously before his mind as is the correspondent to whom
he indites a letter; and must not forget that audiences of
every kind admire and enjoy lucidity of expression and
natural, easy sequence of thought.
And here we must press home the wide difference there is
between the way of setting forth a matter to be heard by
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 113
others and to be read by them. To present a subject in
speech as they would in print seems to be the ambition
of some, but it is almost invariably a great error. We are
not concerned here about their success in print; but for
speaking it must be borne in mind that the hearer has to
keep pace with the speaker, and cannot dwell a moment
longer on a thought or expression than he does, or the next
will be lost to him. The speaker therefore must so express
himself that in the progress of his thought he shall not out-
step his audience; must state nothing too curtly, or pass
from it till it is apprehended ; must not make sudden transi-
tions, nor use ambiguous or difficult language, nor make
obscure allusions ; must, in short, remember that he wishes
his audience to come along with him, perceiving and feeling
his meaning as quickly as he speaks it. He must remember
also that while it has been thought out by him at leisure, it
is presented to them for the first time nor only this, but
may be matter and thinking of a kind which is his daily
occupation, but not theirs.
We have said the beginner must write, and write thor-
oughly. We must add that no man at any period of life
can speak well unless he writes much and carefully, whether
it be on that of which he is to speak, or something entirely
different ; and this not because of a direct connection between
writing and speaking (as some would seem to teach), but
between writing and thinking. No man can speak well who
does not think well, and no one can think well who does not
write much and carefully.
BEAD SPEECH, EEPEATED SPEECH, FREE SPEECH.
The modes of addressing an audience may be presented
under three heads : read speech, repeated speech, free speech.
Let us take first the case of reading an address. The
114 SPEAKING.
reader must bear in mind that he is taking an inferior mode
of discharging his duty. This lays upon him the necessity
of making compensation by every means in his power, while
in fact the tendency and temptation of the method are on
the contrary so to deliver himself as to aggravate instead of
compensate for the disadvantage. One tendency is to mon-
otony. Monotony does not mean one tone only, but also one
set of tones. A speaker may have not a little modulation,
and tones that are pleasant ; but they are soon found to be
coming round and round in their order, sentence after sen-
tence, with a movement as regular as the pace of a well-ridden
rocking-horse, or a boat anchored in a sleepy bay, or, in his
very grandest efforts, the swing of a switchback railway.
Others cannot be said to have any modulation at all, but go
on mumbling, or mkicing, or rasping, or ringing from begin-
ning to end. If the monotonous, with or without modula-
tion, were at any point sharply challenged and put under the
necessity of repeating what they said, they would speedily
drop their unnatural mode. A reader has also the disad-
vantage of not seeing as he should the faces of his audience,
and of not seeing how his face and words are affecting them.
Here both parties suffer loss, and this also must be compen-
sated for.
Not to multiply illustrations, the only way by which he
can successfully combat the disadvantages is by a careful,
constant effort of the will to address in his delivery every
sentence and word straight to the head and heart of the indi-
vidual hearer. We mean that he shall entirely drop the idea
of delivering an address, and act on the principle of saying,
bit by bit, from his own mind to another's what he has got
to say. And if he does this, soul and body, he will come as
near to free speech as a reader can. To a youth who was
wonderfully pleased with his sing-song, heartless, ' fusionless '
reading, and who asked for advice, and who could not other-
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 115
wise be made to understand, we have said, Can you remember
the vigour, determination, and tones in which you would de-
liver yourself in the playground at school 1 Recall that; speak
like that, and it may tell.
For repeated speech the manuscript reproduced by mem-
ory the committal to memory must, at least in the case of
the beginner and the unaccustomed, be perfect. That which
will enable him to repeat correctly in his own room will be
insufficient for repetition in public. Much more complete
familiarity and mastery and ease are required. It must not
be taken for granted that this or that passage will be easily
remembered, or spoken with natural ease, or that the next
' head ' is so outstanding that it is sure to come when wanted.
The business is intrusted to memory, and its success depends
on memory ; and it is notorious that under any stress this is
the first faculty to fail as in age, fatigue, illness, excitement,
surroundings that distract. Therefore no margin of risk
must be left. A word will dislocate a sentence, disturb the
speaker, and bring disaster. The trusted 'head' may dis-
appear when wanted, and cannot be waited for. Besides
such preparation, the speaker during delivery must strictly
avoid turning a thought on himself, as to whether he is doing
well or ill, or on the audience, as to what they are thinking
of him. He must keep his mind concentrated on his work,
and the delivery must be free from the faults that are apt to
attend on reading, free from the slightest suggestion that the
mind is reading from an absent manuscript, and must be
easy, spontaneous, natural, forceful.
By free speech we mean that which is neither read, nor
the language of it spoken from memory. Good first practice
is to gather the gist or points of a narrative, scene, argument,
parable, &c., and speak the matter in the speaker's own
language taking care to keep going, whether well or ill,
and not to attempt to catch any words of the original, if
116 SPEAKING.
they do not come spontaneously. In describing any scene,
animate or inanimate, he should see mentally the whole
scene before him, and describe it as he sees it; and this
should be practised. Also let the beginner take part
in debating or other societies where speaking may be re-
quired without preparation of words. Again, it is good
that he should speak at first where he is more anxious to
benefit his hearers than afraid of their criticism. This
indeed ought always to be the case, but it is more easily
attained in some circumstances than in others. It need
hardly be said that the fuller one's store of words the
better not that he may indulge in deluges of vocables, but
that he may always have the right word. And in all
exercises or opportunities he should do his best to call up
the proper word. But above all, he must rather blunder
in his words and grammar than hesitate, and become confused,
and go back. Much will be overlooked in a young speaker
who is saying what is worth hearing, and saying it heartily.
Indeed there is probably no audience which would not let
go the niceties of grammar and word-selection, and retain
such speaking, if they could not have both. The speaker
requires confidence, self-control, command of his words ; and
this will only come by practice, and by speaking what he
knows and is resolved to say, and says heartily, and by
going on. That the power of free speech may be acquired
is testified to by numberless instances of excellent speakers
for whom at first it seemed hopeless. It need scarcely be
said that what is to be spoken must be clearly thought out,
the matter well assorted and thoroughly in hand.
Minds differ so much that we should wish to say here
no more than seems to have good foundation in the consti-
tution of the mind generally, and to have been general
experience. On these grounds we would venture to call
in question an advice which is to be heard, to prepare for
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 117
free speech by writing what is to be said two or three times
over either literally or in substance. This proceeding cannot
fail to bring the memory into action to recall words and
phrases that were written. The mind is divided between
trust in its power of present selection and trust in its mem-
ory of past selection ; and it falls between them. It goes
hunting with memory when it should stand to its guns, and
defeat is inevitable. It is better to line out the matter,
as we have said ; get it thoroughly into the mind ; think
out the filling up with any pen assistance that may be
necessary ; and, if there is anything that must be spoken
exactly, commit it perfectly to memory, but if even this
should fail to come when wanted, let it be given as best
can be, and not allowed to embarrass the speaker. No hearer
should suspect that this precious piece ever existed.
If one is to begin his career with either of the other two
modes of address as an introduction to free speech, let it not
be by reading, for this carries one farther and farther away
from it. Speaking from memory, however, may lead on to
free speech. We know it has done so ; and we suppose
the explanation may be that one acquires by means of it
self-command and self-reliance ; and possibly at times his
memory has failed in a word or two, and yet, speaking
heartij, he has found no difficulty in bridging the hiatus,
and perhaps doing better than the manuscript.
It may be that most speakers will find it an advantage
to have before them a jotting of the points of their address.
No doubt resolute practice would train to dispensing even
with this. But we shall only say of it that the more one
relies 311 such jottings the more he will require them ; and
unless it is rigidly guarded against, they will increase more
and nore in fulness. Such as can use free speech will
find tiat the more they can dispense with external aids the
more successful will be the speaking.
118 SPEAKING.
Put the three modes now into comparison on the sup-
position that they receive equal justice in equally competent
hands.
Both nature and experience place free speech decisively
above the other methods. Indeed it so far excels them that
it can bear some detraction from the equality of the con-
ditions we have supposed, and still be found to hold the
first place. It admits and promotes the completest sympathy
between the speaker and the hearer; and it has the inval-
uable superiority of being most freshly and fully charged
with the life of the speaker's mind and heart. It is avail-
able, too, on occasions when one must speak and the other
methods are impossible occasions which were never so
numerous as at present, and are still increasing. In ordinary
circumstances it is not more exhausting ; many tMnk it less
so. It tells far more on every hearer than reading tells
on the few. Whoever would be a public speaker should
thoroughly acquire this faculty.
Next in estimation is repeated speech speech that has
been written and is spoken from memory. If it should be
said that the highest efforts of oratory have been by this
method, no purpose would be served by disputing it ; but
we place against it the conviction that the best effects of
oratory have not been produced by it. It is difficult to
write language which is not too literary for speech ; And no
freedom in speaking from memory can perfectly sinulate
free speech, and get through the chinks of the hearer's heart
as it does. A curious fact in gesture which we shall have
to mention later is significant of the natural, and probably
therefore insurmountable, difference between them. The
highest efforts in speaking from memory may excite great
admiration ; may make hearers hold their breath ; nay im-
press them as a swift - rushing, swollen river, or B great
storm at sea impresses onlookers who have no cause for
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 119
anxiety ; may even lift the hearer above himself and enwrap
him in the subject along with the speaker; but these are
inferior effects of oratory, and there can hardly be doubt
that in the so-called highest efforts by this method the
effects which are of highest and best quality are small in
proportion. Nevertheless, when it can be well done, and
not in its highest efforts, repeated speech is greatly superior
to read speech. It can look the audience in the face and
be quickened and humanised by the sight ; and in short it
comes very much nearer to free speech than reading does.
If, therefore, the speaker cannot attain to free speech, and
if his gift of memory, and the time at his disposal from
other occupations (among which is not to be classed gadding,
desultory reading, or over-indulgence in fiction) will allow
him, he ought unhesitatingly to prefer it to read speech.
We come now to read speech. By universal consent this is
(on the conditions of our comparison) the least effective and,
by audiences generally, least appreciated. He who would
say something to his fellows, and has got no farther than to
put it in writing, institutes at once a prejudice against
himself with most people. Then the style of language is
likely to differ from spoken language more than in the
other cases. The eye also, if not chained to the manuscript,
is at least divided in its attention, and when it looks up
suggests little more than a momentary escape from the
chain. Intonation is much more likely to be monotonous ;
and natural, appropriate gesture is impossible. Guthrie was
wont to picture the despairing wooer offering his hand and
heart by reading from a written paper. Politicians turning
out a paper to read to their constituents would not be
listened to. Why has custom allowed it so largely in the
pulpit 1 Is it because ministers have proved it is the best
they can do 1 Or is it because they have not matter and
language and manner that can be made to suit the other
120 SPEAKING.
modes ? Or is it because some of the greater lights in the
pews think it a deference to their fastidious taste in bookish
language and expressionless deportment ? This last must be
rarest, for such people do go to hear and enjoy an able, free
speaker. Only one is named as having produced the highest
effects of speech by this mode the great Scotch preacher
Chalmers. So one man took the city gate of Gaza posts
and all and carried them on his shoulders to a distant hill-
top. Give us the strength of Samson, or the spirit and
power of Chalmers, and comparison of methods is at an end.
But from the case of Chalmers there is much to learn. Not
only did he read, but his speech is said to have been thick
and his accent provincial, while he had none of the accessory
accomplishments which always contribute to good speaking ;
and further still, he actually followed the lines of his manu-
script with his finger. But what mattered all this when
great thoughts filled his mind, and glowed in his imagina-
tion, and poured impetuous from a fervent spirit, in language
massive and weighty, delivered with the whole force of his
soul and the whole force of his body, of which the vigorous
action of the right arm was only the most visible of the
signs 1 There is a lesson even in the finger that kept the
place. "Why was it there? Either that the eye might be
freer to cast its gleam over the audience, or because the
excitement and energy were such that the eye was untrust-
worthy as a place-keeper probably for both reasons. The
whole case is the best illustration of that which we have
been enforcing on every opportunity, the supreme essential
importance of speaking, body, soul, and spirit, as one who is
burning with the importance of what he has to say, and with
desire that his hearers should be of the same mind. This is
as important for one mode of address as another. It cannot
but be aided by laying aside every weight which lies in
defective training and in the paper itself. And we would
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 121
infinitely prefer a speaker pouring forth wise and interesting
thoughts in such a manner as to need his finger at the line,
to a trained but soulless performer who runs no risk of losing
the place, and has no other use for his finger. The writer
has only once, and that recently, heard a preacher who read,
and yet spoke with such freedom and power and action and
fervour that it was not easy to believe he could be reading.
Having in view all that has been said, we cannot place
the student in any better position for understanding and
putting into practice this most important word : Every man
is bound to turn himself to the best account.
Writing for the inexperienced, we pass now to physical
preparation for a public address.
The body should if possible have rest before the address,
and, if it can be had, there is no better preparative than
sleep. The treatment to which many subject themselves
can be accounted for only by ignorance, or little regard for
their audience or themselves. An aspirant for parliament-
ary honours stands up to address his constituents after toil-
ing through the fields for a day with his gun, and then
setting the power that moves the brain to digest a meal.
The verdict on that address was 'poor.' Another has it
announced for him that he had ridden forty miles that day,
and of course he also had lately taken a meal. The verdict
on that address was ' poor.' They essayed to speak at a time
when nature had not only withdrawn blood from the brain
but called for general rest. We have heard ministers say
they rather liked a five miles' walk before taking the pulpit
that is, spending their strength for an hour and a half be-
fore beginning that which had the first claim on their whole
strength. Even the previous day will tell, if it has been
fatiguing. Some will work excitedly at their desks through
the night, and a few hours later begin the work of the day
122 SPEAKING.
with an overtaxed, irritated nervous system quivering with
excitement. Even this unhealthy condition they may like
for the stimulus of it ; but it is unsound, without real
strength, and rapidly hums itself out, and long "before the
task is over exhaustion has supervened. Thus men destroy
their health, their temper, their mental balance or soundness
of judgment, get into trouble, spend wretched lives, perhaps
must quit their post. To take strong drink before speaking
is from every point of view a most serious error. If it is
intended to stimulate, it is taken at the stage when this is
not required, and by the reaction hastens the coming of
fatigue. If it is taken to stupefy over-sensitive feelings,
sensitiveness is better than stupefaction, and such treatment
is full of danger.
It should be said that it takes a strong man to speak well
fasting. There is risk in speaking just after a generous
dinner, especially when the brain vessels are losing the
elasticity of youth.
As for the glass of water, it is like pouring water on a
heated axle, and with as little benefit. No provision should
be made for it ; then it is soon forgot, and a hurtful bad
habit is gone. All such expedients are better avoided.
Finally, the speaker will find that if he begins in a sound
and fit physical condition, he will speak easier and better
as he goes on, either in the same or in successive addresses,
and though it should be for days, till fatigue begins. The
first indication of fatigue will be that the chariot of his
speech begins to drive heavily ; and he should, if possible,
immediately leave off.
SELF-POSSESSION.
How may one best preserve his self-possession before the
audience] There are two prescriptions that seem to have
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 123
more currency than others. 'Lose yourself in your sub-
ject/ we are told. But we are not told how a man may
lose himself and yet possess himself much less be master
of himself and master of the position. And we are unable
to see how a person lost in a subject is more likely to be
self-possessed than when he is lost on a moor or in a fog.
Again, we are told, c Lose sight of your audience ' ; and
Madame Malibran, the singer, is quoted as telling that she
overcame her timidity by regarding her audience as cabbages.
The power of will which could do this might have done
better ; but in her case it was not necessary, for there is no
reason why one should not sing among cabbages, though it
would be very irrational to speak to them. The truth is
that both of those prescriptions err in omitting much which
every one intuitively feels to be essential in the communi-
cating of his thought to another. To the same effect is the
teaching of a recent author, which he actually heads, ' Art
of forgetting yourself and others.' Now most of us can
remember the wise maternal caution, * Don't forget yourself,
now/ or 'Bemember who is hearing you/ And who has
not heard the criticism, ' He forgot himself,' or, l He forgot
that so-and-so was hearing him 7 1 Who shall tell what one
might not do or say if he forgot himself, and still worse if
he forgot also that others were present 1 All could see the
absurdity of such counsels if applied to behaviour in a
drawing-room or a small committee-room. They are equally
absurd, and for the same reasons, when applied to the platform
or pulpit. The speaker must neither lose himself, nor forget
himself nor his audience. We would not ' make a man an
offender for a word ' ; but either the intended meaning is
wrong, or the words which are chosen to express it.
The truest and most effectual preservative of self-possession
is a powerful motive impelling to speak, and to speak so as
to reach the minds and hearts of the audience. And this is
124 SPEAKING.
a preservative which ought never to be wanting to those at
least who speak from the pulpit. Next to that is a strong
sense of duty, which will set one's face like a flint to do what
has devolved upon him wherever it falls to be done ; and
this he knows is not to forget himself, but to express himself,
and not to forget his audience, but to address his audience.
Next, we would prescribe thorough preparedness. Those at
least who have come through the university with its many
examinations know that just in proportion to their mastery
of a subject was their self-possession and freedom from con-
fusion when they underwent their trials. To these things
we may add that a foreseeing and practically-minded man
will forecast for himself the circumstances, so that they can
scarcely surprise him. And finally, he will bear in mind the
suggestions which we have made about health.
SELF-OBSERVATION.
To speak with genuine power, it is as necessary to avoid
what may be called self -observation as to preserve self-
possession. If the speaker is thinking of himself along with
his subject, or of the manner and not of the matter ; if his
attention is taken up with his intonations and gestures ; if
he is concerned to appear well, to be thought graceful, cul-
tivated, striking, he has sold his strength for nought. Here
again the favourite prescription is, 'Lose yourself in your
subject.' But it was given also to promote self-possession;
and, as this very self-possession is apt to lead to* self-observa-
tion, the advice may be a cause instead" of a cure. To lose
oneself is as undesirable here as ever. An important part of
the cure is suggested from a very different quarter.
When one looks at the words on a page, he is not thinking
of his eyes ; when he lifts a book, or tests some article by
handling, he is not thinking of his hands ; when he walks,
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 125
he is not thinking of his feet. He is occupied with that on
which he looks or which he handles, and as he walks his
attention is on that which is "before him, and on many things
other than his walking. But while he is thus without
thought of the very organs which are doing the work, and
of the manner of their doing it, they are not lost, nor is he
in any sense lost in relation to them or their work. They
are acting under his immediate control and by direction of
his will. His will is actively hent on his purpose ; and if the
instruments by which he is working it out require so little
attention that they seem to be forgot, what is the reason?
It is because they have so perfectly learned the lesson of
obedience ; it is because of the ease and naturalness with
which they serve the will, and thereby set it free to grapple
with that for which both it and they have received their
power. What have we here, then, but a repetition of the call
to master our tools to provide ourselves with such flexibility
of voice, power of intonation, correctness of expression,
facility of movement for gesture, and all else, that they need
no direct attention, and that we need no more and should
no more turn to think of them than we turn to think of the
eye, or the hand, or the foot in the matters we have sup-
posed, that so our powers may shoot straight over and past
all this to the great end we seek ?
GESTURE.
Gesture is language more natural than words, and con-
veying its message more swiftly. A child's gestures are in-
telligent long in advance of speech. Gesture speaks by the
features of the countenance (called facial gesture), by the
posture and movements of the whole body and its parts
the manner in which it bends or straightens, plants its foot,
presents its chest, moves its shoulders, carries its head ; and
126 SPEAKING.
by the innumerable movements of the arms from shoulder,
elbow, wrist, and every joint of the hand. It can express
every feeling and every state of the will. Natural gesture is
as continuous as the thought and language of the speaker.
It may be the gesture of repose, or of any degree of activity
that the occasion dictates, but it never ceases.
It is not, as some seem to suppose, simultaneous with the
word, in illustration or in supplement of it ; much less is it
in any degree behind the word ; but it invariably and cer-
tainly takes the lead of the word. It helps the hearer to
the coming thought, which no doubt largely accounts for the
pleasure it gives. Herein there is a remarkable difference
between free speech and speech from memory. In the latter
the gesture, with scarcely an exception, comes at best only
simultaneously with the word, and oftenest the word has
begun before it. This deviation from nature is enough to
reveal him who is speaking from memory or manuscript, and
some may recall it in a late pulpit orator. Even when one
emphasises a word by a simultaneous rap on the table, if he
is speaking naturally the gesture has had the lead in the up-
lifting of the arm for the coming effect.
Drummond, in his * Ascent of Man, 7 would limit gesture
to a stage in man's ' ascent/ and considers that when a
certain degree of lofty and abstract thought is reached it
will disappear. But it may be safely predicted that, so
long as his ascending man is in the body, when he heartily
communicates his thoughts (however ' lofty ' or ' abstract ')
to his fellows, he will use gesture. The organs of speech
and the mind itself are too intimately associated with the
whole man not to make sure of this.
Race and temperament make gesture easier or more diffi-
cult, but ought not to govern it. From the south of Italy
and France northward to ourselves, the activity of gesture
grows less. Among ourselves generally it might be called
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 127
wholly the gesture of repose, were it not for jerks and twists
of the body and motions of the head, as if just to show that
there is not repose. We listened to a recent discourse in
which the only gesture for strong feeling of whatever kind
was to shorten the neck and make the head shiver. For
most men natural gesture with read speech is impracticable :
if any have fire and power enough to rise above this, they
need no help of man ; if they have not, that help is vain.
Ministers have a hindrance of their own ; for though the
pulpit has its advantages, there are gestures which it cannot
but conceal or impede.
As gesture is not artificial but natural, correct rules for the
employment of it would only be statements of what has been
observed in nature, and even then natural gesture could not
come in obedience to rule. But further, gesture may be
prompted by nature and yet be sadly bungled. How
many are to be seen who cannot even make a bow,
but only a kind of great nod, or a crook, or a cringe?
Nature has to be trusted with the prompting, but cannot
be trusted with the execution. Accordingly, while to learn
a code of gestures would be useless labour, to cultivate
oneself for the proper and easy execution of any gesture
prompted by nature is most valuable labour. Here, as in
other departments, the counsel to be urged is : Get the
perfect mastery of your tools. There is scarcely a motion
that may have to be made, great or small, that can be grace-
fully and well made without practice, and much practice.
When such practice has done its work, nearly all that can
be done for gesture in ordinary cases has been done.
The instinct of gesture, and the marring of it on a large
scale, are well seen in a most objectionable habit of some
speakers who, with an audience on either hand, will turn
their back impassionedly upon the one set while they stare
the other in the face. At the root of this is the very proper
I
128 SPEAKING.
impulse which would say, ' Let all men hear and know all
men on every side.' So effectually is the end defeated that
even all men there present do not hear. The natural action
is a sweep of the eye around, with only such motion of the
head and body as will drive home the intent like a flash.
This does not interfere with being heard, especially as it is
naturally accompanied by greater force of voice.
Another obvious mistake is thrusting the forefinger into
the faces of the hearers. This is natural only when the
speaker's mood or matter is disagreeable. Directed to any-
thing else than the hearer it is rarely suitable, except in the
expression of belittling or dislike.
THE PHYSICAL ELEMENT.
Much is lost often the whole battle is lost from miscon-
ception of, or inattention to, the part which belongs to the
body in public speech. One may any day hear a speaker
from whose style it might fairly be inferred that the only
service rendered by the body was to support the speaking
organs at sufficient height. It is a great error, at the very
root of power in speech. The whole body, nerve and sinew,
must be braced up to the work. This does not mean that it
should dash itself about, or endanger the surroundings, or try
the power of the hearer's endurance; but it works to the
advantage of the speaker's mind, and vibrates in his voice,
and tells on the hearer. We cannot be mentally active in
speech if we are physically limp and sluggish ; and though
the voice may carry the words, the whole physical power
must be firmed up if the thoughts are to reach their mark.
To see how much more effectively one speaks on his feet
than in his seat is a very suggestive lesson on the subject.
Deficiency here is often the explanation of what has seemed
want of mental and moral strength, So also men of equal
PUBLIC SPEAKING. 129
mental endowments may be seen differing widely in power
because of the part the body plays. It is not merely thought
which has to be communicated, but vital force; and the
medium is not words alone, but the whole man ; and this
is as true of religious force as of any other. It is not more
mysterious than the fact which underlies it, that the minds
of both speaker and hearer can communicate only through
the bodies of both. Let us lay to heart what universal
experience has proved.
IMITATION.
Imitate no one ; but, while your education lasts, carefully
observe every one. Only peculiarities lend themselves to
imitation ; and the imitator little thinks that he is but adding
those of another to his own. Even the professional mimic is
disarmed by the perfectly natural speaker, for he is helpless
unless he can seize and reproduce some distinctive points.
It follows that the man who can be imitated is the very man
that should not be so; and the imitator may reflect that,
besides adding to his own oddities, he will, if successful, be
known as a copyist by those who know the original. But to
learn from observation of any, or every, speaker whom we
hear is a very different thing, and may be turned to most
excellent account. Are all his vowel sounds and articula-
tions uttered correctly and distinctly, as well as his words,
little and large, and all this with ease 1 If not, detect the
shortcoming, and see that your own speech is free from it.
Do the words go clearly forth, so as not merely to be heard,
but to tell 1 Is the manner of speech natural, absolutely free
from affectation, sing-song, or any monotony ? Is his matter
quite easy to follow, not only by me but by the rest of the
audience 1 Thus by observation of others we may be greatly
profiting ourselves.
130
PAET VI.
THE PULPIT.
ALL that has been said is as directly applicable to the pulpit
as to any place. But in some respects the pulpit has a
character of its own, so that we cannot be said to have
accomplished our task till we have treated of certain addi-
tional matters specially associated with it. Our aim has been
to aid those who would cultivate the heaven-given faculty of
speaking so that it may best serve its appointed uses. The
highest of these is reached in the pulpit, and there speech
should be at its best.
The greatest power of the Christian pulpit has always been
found to lie, and always will lie, in its own proper subject
Christ Jesus the eternal Son of God, who was made flesh,
and dwelt among us, and died for our sins, and rose again,
and is alive for evermore interceding and reigning and who
will come again in glory to judge the world ; with the vast
expanse of relative truth which fills the pages of the Old and
New Testaments deeper than the depths, higher than the
heavens, touching every possible condition of the soul and
destiny of every man from condemnation and doom to glory,
honour, and immortality the whole a direct message from
God to man for man's sake.
As has already been stated in these pages, it was a grave
sense of the boundless importance of the pulpit which moved
THE PULPIT. 131
me to this work, that whoever would be a preacher might be
helped to do his very best ; because in such a service no man
should do less, and also because much of his message is un-
welcome to the natural heart, for the offence of the cross has
not ceased. For both reasons the obligation is upon us to
take care that nothing in the manner of executing the
preacher's commission should put any kind of hindrance in
his way, and that as far as possible everything from the least
to the greatest should tend to make the importance of his
message felt, and to speed it home. Never was this so need-
ful as in these days of education, fastidiousness, impatience,
and critical temper.
Yet I would impress on my younger brethren that as we
advocate being 'meet for the Master's use/ in all respects,
because of the infinite importance of the subject, so, if this
subject is wanting, no accomplishments can supply its place.
Nay more, the subject may be present in all its fulness, yet
if he who ministers would possess the power which is pro-
vided for us, and which is necessary for the work, he must
minister with a profound living faith in Christ and His sal-
vation, with a faith which is grasping the outstretched hand
of Him to whom 'all power is given/ and who gave 'the
promise of the Holy Ghost/ and with a heroic confidence in
His Gospel.
Certain things may be noticed at the outset which, though
external to the minister, and not to be laid to his charge, are
hindrances to him which ought not to exist. The pulpit and
its furnishings often show but little regard for his conveni-
ence. Sometimes its very smallness cramps him. Again,
one may wish to lay by him a pair of spectacles, a watch, a
psalm-book, a hymn-book, not to speak of any other book ;
and if he finds trustworthy provision for one or two of them,
he may count himself fortunate. In most cases he will
132 SPEAKING.
certainly have to turn round and deposit some of them on his
seat. If architects are unaware of what is required, is there
no minister at hand who can see to it ? Even the height of
the bookboard seems to receive only perfunctory attention.
In a certain church, within a few weeks of each other, two
ministers of average height, and widely different in years, had
to remove the cushion from the board, because, though fitted
with a screw, it was too high even at its lowest. Measuring
from the surface on which the book rests, at the side nearest
to the minister, the lowest height should not be more than
three feet from the floor ; and the full height should not be
less than eight inches more.
More than ever we hear of churches that are difficult to
speak in or rather to hear in. Comparison of churches will
show that apparently the principal reason is the present fashion
of rejecting galleries. The result is too much unbroken
elastic, or reverberating, surface. Wires across the line of
sound could be no remedy, as has been proved ; and radiating
wires are for distance. The nature of the cause points dis-
tinctly to tapestry as the most likely cure. It is well known
how hearing becomes easier when the pews are filled with
people ; it would be immeasurably more so if (grotesque
though the fancy is) the walls also were lined with them.
So far as the speaker is concerned, that which is required
of him is simply more carefulness to speak well. Expedients
suggested to him to suit a particular church are rarely of
any use, and are never to be relied on. It is at least certain
that if he really speaks well, there can be little need of
them. It says little for pulpit-speaking that in one church
two out of three candidates could not be heard, and in another
five out of six. In a church that might be named, the acous-
tics of which are pronounced delightful, and where the most
distant hearer is only sixty feet away, the majority are not
fully heard. On the other hand, a few with no better natural
THE PULPIT. 133
endowments are fully heard in St Giles'. The author has
for many years been accustomed to say, and increasing
observation and experience have constantly confirmed it, that
the only admissible - excuse for not being heard in our
churches (with perhaps some rare and peculiar exception un-
known to him) is when the place is too large for the speaker's
strength the hearers too far distant, as when, for example,
he can reach to fifty yards but no farther. When this in-
superable condition is absent there are invariably, and
obviously to those who can discern, sufficient faults of
speech to do more than account for not being heard. 1
When discoursing of churches that are * difficult to speak
in,' people have need to beware of misapprehension. It sur-
prised me to discover that one who spoke of difficult churches
meant such as were irresponsive to the voice, treating him
with dead indifference, so that, as he imagined, his voice could
not 'get away.' Such places, he said, strained his voice.
Now these are the very places which are easiest to hear in,
though they are the most difficult to make a noise in. In
such a place the voice, and nothing but the voice, is heard as
it really is. It therefore disappoints the speaker who loves
to hear himself * sounding the place. 1 But it is an advantage
to the hearer ; and just in proportion as this state of the case
is departed from the difficulty of hearing increases. In pro-
1 The author had concluded from what seemed to be universal testi-
mony that the M'Ewan Hall of Edinburgh University was, at least in
certain parts, unhappily a hopeless failure in acoustics ; and he obtained
an opportunity of trying to discover the cause. The discovery which
to his surprise he did make was, that he could find nothing amiss with
the acoustics. He spoke from every part of the platform and in vari-
ous ways. The hall was empty but for three hearers. They sat in
all parts. One of these, the hallkeeper, had never heard his voice
before. The sentences spoken were without context, and they were
not easy to speak, being taken from the list of difficult combinations
of words in a former part of this work (p. 77). The experiment was
entirely convincing to him in favour of the hall.
134: SPEAKING.
portion as the place sounds, though only in the degree that
our disappointed speaker would desire, the hearer is at a dis-
advantage. The speaker who dislikes the dull place and
likes the other is mistaken as to both, if his object is to be
well heard. One who is used to houses which he makes to
sound, and where he feels as if his voice ' got away,' has the
feeling in other places that his voice is poorer and less effec-
tive, and so is led naturally to strain it. The fact is, that it
is only here the true character of his voice appears. If it is
actually poor and ineffective, this is almost certainly because
its qualities are undeveloped. But his voice is the same in
the other place, though there he is deceived. In neither case
should there be straining ; in both there should be good
speaking, and of sufficient force for the distances ; and it is
not the dull place but the other that demands most care. It
may help to prevent misconception if, in comparing churches
in this respect, we speak rather of their being difficult or easy
to hear in than to speak in.
But while that which is to be looked for from the minister
may thus be seen, the responsibility for building churches
which are difficult to speak and hear in is in no degree
lessened. One never hears of failure in theatres. We had
lately the pleasure and satisfaction of conversing on the sub-
ject with a highly cultured architect. He considered we
were speaking quite truly, except in so far as we put any
responsibility on the architect. He said in substance, Make
up your mind what you want the church for to speak and
hear in, or for show, or for what other use and we will
build you a church to suit.
In some things things too on the very surface young
men (in Scotland) are apt to adopt ways and words which
they would be the first to discard, if only they thought of
subjecting them for a moment to the eye of their own
THE PULPIT. 135
common - sense. Even that which seems small may do
much to increase or diminish power.
Does it become an ambassador of Christ to crawl to the
pulpit as if his legs were entangled, or to hang his head as
if he were ashamed 1
' Let us begin the public worship of God at this time (or,
this forenoon) by singing/ &c. Is it not rather ridiculous
that the facts as to the beginning, the publicity, and the time
should not be taken for granted] It is surely every way
better to say simply, ' Let us worship God ' a call relating
to the whole service. And then, ' Let us ' [some act of
worship]. It is equally ill-considered to be thrusting the
words 'at this time,' or 'this day,' here and there into
prayer, from the very beginning where it starts with ' We
come before Thee at this time.'
One stands up and shuts his eyes, and with shut eyes
speaking to the congregation says, ' Let us pray/ Another
with eyes open enough says, * Let us pray ' ; yet he does not
pray, but proceeds to recite some verses of Scripture, which
he addresses to the people with his eyes shut.
One calls upon the congregation to sing, and, this begun,
he betakes himself openly to some unnecessary private ar-
rangements. Perhaps he turns up a place in the Bible, and,
when the singing is finished and he calls to prayer, flops him-
self upon the open book. Why should a man treat the
Bible in church as he would not treat any valued book in
his own or another's study 1 Or he calls to singing and then
gazes idly about him as if he had no further interest in the
proceedings ; or he darts his eye like a search-light over the
congregation, or perhaps on the devoted head of a single wor-
shipper ; or he notes the absentees ; or he does other such
things during which he cannot be whole-heartedly worship-
ping. One will call on the people to sing, and immediately
check their good intent by some distracting intimation.
136 SPEAKING.
He has an organist and choir, and the case is worse if it be
only a precentor, for whom it is a matter of some comfort (to
say nothing stronger) not to be kept waiting after they ex-
pected to begin, nor to be called to begin when they did not
expect it yet he seems actually to plan for their annoyance :
he will read never a word of what is to be sung, or the
whole of it, or two lines, or a verse, or two or more verses,
never twice the same thing, without rhyme or reason most
patent thoughtlessness or disregard of others. He should
have an understood method.
Again, it is expected that, when anything is announced to
be read or sung, the congregation shall find the passage and
give attention on the book throughout ; yet here is one who
gives no time to find it, but dashes off at full speed as if
he were giving drill in the art of overtaking him. What-
ever may be the cause of this, we suggest as both curative
and becoming that he should himself turn up the passage
simultaneously with his audience.
A moment's action of common-sense would also forbid the
use of a word which the hearers do not understand, and still
more the use of a word in one sense which they understand,
and are accustomed to use, in quite another such as 'pre-
vent ' in the sense of ' go before.'
Then we hear, 'Let us read the Word of God as it is
contained in/ &c. Could there be poorer penny-a-lining ?
Change it, say, to 'Let us read the Word of God in the
Book of , or the Epistle to ; the eighth chapter/
&c. Do not say, 'Matthew's Gospel' It is God's Gospel
'The Gospel, according to Matthew.'
Those who always end a reading of Scripture with ' Amen '
have not seldom to use it where no sensible man would think
of doing so. We lately heard it with most curious effect at
the end of Gen. xxxii. A study of Scripture passages would
indicate by what contexts one is rightly moved to say Amen
THE PULPIT. 137
e.g., Ps. xli., Ixxii. ; Matt. vi. ; Kom. i., ix., xv. ; Gal. i. ;
Eph. iii. ; 1 Tim. vi. Why not simply ask (always so needful)
that God would bless that reading? To end everything mis-
cellaneously with Amen tends to confusion of thought, and
to its being regarded as no more than a finale (see p. 159).
Even a very young man, if brought up in Scotland, might
know that a preacher's l notes/ still more his sermon in
manuscript, are generally regarded as his own private aids,
for his own eye only ; and that people accordingly rather
dislike to see them made a show of openly, especially in a
way which suggests their self-assertive independence of the
Bible. Yet, now, some bear the daintily covered manuscript
along in presence of all ; and we have even seen it, with a
fine disregard of effect, spread conspicuous on the top of the
closed Bible.
In the delivery of the sermon may be seen such perform-
ances as no platform can equal. One stands like a graven
image, only more careful than the image not to discompose
himself; another in his great height writhes like a con-
strictor, for no conceivable reason thrusts his hands into
his girdle and writhes ; another jerks his head down snap-
pishly on his hearers with the accented syllable of every
word ; another ascends and descends, pivoting on the ball
of his great toe with wonderful constancy and endurance ;
another twirls himself from side to side, and wriggles and
bobs and aimlessly spends himself to the great discomfort
of his hearers. One hangs his hands on the front of his
garments and, in the distance, where the arms are not dis-
tinguishable, they show like bits of ilesh ; another in a gown
puts his arms akimbo and suggests a flying bat ; another now
and again takes to pulling his attire, as if his dressing had
been mismanaged. Another, instead of looking to those
whom he is supposed to be addressing, gazes out into space
as if longing after some invisible beings ; and so the eyes,
138 SPEAKING.
most mobile and expressive of features, become for the
service of speech as unpleasant and useless as if they were
of glass.
Let a man walk to his place as one going to a piece of
work which he means to perform, and about which he is
serious ; and let him stand squarely and firmly on his feet,
freely at the disposal of nature for gesture. But all inept
and grotesque habits must be relentlessly grappled with and
completely overcome, and senseless practices abandoned.
What shall we say of those pulpits in which (for ordin-
ary occasions of ordinary worship) there is now an ' Order
of Service,' placed in the hands of whoever may officiate,
established by the minister, fixed in detail even to the
words with which you are to conclude your sermon, and
the order which the thoughts and desires are to take in
prayer 1 While the general order of the Church should pre-
vent vagaries, and while by this method it is well, so far
as needful, to prevent embarrassment to those who must co-
operate in conducting the worship, we cannot but say that
beyond that extent no person need submit to it, at least in
churches where liberty has been secured secured in their
claim of liberty for the Spirit of God ; that it falls in with
the propensity to give to the external a foremost place ; and
that it is a mistake in a minister to hinder a substitute from
following his own bent, not only because he cannot other-
wise be at his best, but also because of its possible import-
ance to some who are there. Hearts and minds may be
reached which never responded, or have ceased to respond,
to the ' Order,' l for thou knowest not whether shall prosper,
either this or that, or whether they both shall be alike good/
Take the case of prayer. Most people have loved ones at
home or elsewhere not a few of them probably in danger,
pain, or sorrow and would not willingly leave the Throne on
THE PULPIT. 139
their first approach to it without entreaty for them ; it may
be assumed also that Christians desire early to bespeak
blessing on means of grace everywhere for the day ; yet
there are Orders which decree that such things must wait
till next time, or next ; and so on. Preaching may, as
it should, result in some spiritual condition which longs
to utter itself to God, but there is no place for this. One
can hardly ask or give thanks for any blessing without
feeling some relative unworthiness, and vice versa. All
such things are of the essence of prayer, and are means
of quickening and deepening full - hearted prayerfulness ;
and there is undoubted hindrance to this in the system
to which we refer.
Nor can we omit to notice the shock which it has been
to many ministers to be accosted by the organist with the
request to know what would be the concluding words of
the several prayers that the organ might strike in at the
proper moment with Amen. If people are to sing Amen to
a spoken prayer, the blame is probably not with the organ-
ist. None the less there is in that which he is obliged to
do such a misconception of realities and such impropriety
as to make it most objectionable as well as amazing. Most
men who pour out their hearts unto God, voicing the hearts
of their people, could not dream of foretelling (even were it
seemly so to do) in what words they might be led to con-
clude their prayers. If I may not counsel, I will at least
entreat, my young brethren to bear in mind that many
things which they may have seen or become accustomed to,
in high places, or in certain congregations, however satis-
factory they may have been in the circumstances, are unsuit-
able and unedifying, if not offensive, in ordinary spheres.
And I would here also put in an earnest plea for the exclu-
sion of anything that the congregation are unable to accom-
pany 'with the understanding' (1 Cor. xiv.).
140 SPEAKING.
Before the practice spreads farther it is desirable that more
consideration should be given to the objection cherished by
many good and able men, among whom was Dr A. K. H. Boyd,
to the entire discontinuance of reading from the pulpit any
of the metre Psalms and Paraphrases when given out to be
sung. Nothing need be said of exceptional congregations ;
but in most congregations there are many who cannot read
well, or at any rate do not read much ; and there are many
who do not sing and do not follow what is being sung,
and many who sing and are taken up with the music. The
reading of the verses, well done, may be a powerful means
of grace, may store the mind, or refresh it, with truth,
better than can be otherwise done, and may better pre-
pare the worshipper to ' sing praises with understanding '
(Ps. xlvii).
It may be useful to mention here that the prefixing of
texts of Scripture to hymns is not the work of their authors
but of hymn-book compilers, and to remind that the main
use of reading out something at the announcement of a hymn
is to identify it in the mind of the hearer, which is evidently
best done by the first or first two lines.
The opportunity may also be taken here to tell that a
friendly and competent judge, the Bishop of Winchester, has
said he thought our worship had lost something by so much
substitution of hymns for psalms. Such an opinion, and
the same comes from other quarters, should help to repress
the tendency where it exists to sing little except hymns.
Young ministers would do well to think over c measuring
themselves by themselves and comparing themselves among
themselves.' If this should be done in the spirit of saying
1 this man and that man is no better than I, and as he has
got an appointment so shall I,' such thoughts not only keep
down the standard, but are alien to the true spirit of the
THE PULPIT. 141
ministry. Even comparison made in order to excel, how-
ever helpful it may be, carries one up but a very small way,
and in some measure takes the place of the only proper
inspiration. Let every one on his knees settle with his
Master how He would have him execute any part of his
duties. This will brace him up to his best, and keep him
constantly and strenuously striving to do better still. Thus
one's level would be ever rising, and the general level of all
rising, and this in the sense in which our Lord desires to see
it rise, and there would soon be less cause for the question,
' What becomes of all the preaching ? ' Here an important
question suggests itself : Why should it be that men who
are capable of improvement, and who find one after another
preferred before them, should yet show no sign of having set
themselves to self-improvement by reason of the experience?
On preparation for the pulpit this much must be added
to what has already been said (p. 112). The spirit and
purpose of their ministry should be with young ministers all
the week, and this with special reference to their next
Sunday's work ; and (discounting men of extraordinary
powers) they should have no other mental work on hand
than that of their ministry.
Ministers should be enthusiasts for Christ and for His
cause and for the souls of men.
For the public reading of Scripture the counsels on reading
generally which we have been pressing on the attention
throughout need to be supplemented by one thing only
that no reading so deeply concerns him that reads and
them that hear, or may have so great and far-reaching
consequences. To this day, after so long a time as forty
years, I do not read in public without having carefully
looked through the passage, that every item may, if possible,
142 SPEAKING.
speak naturally and truly to head and heart that which it
means, and lest I should miss a connection, or be taken
unawares by a transition, or overlook the point or shade of
meaning, or fall into any other of the numberless possible
mistakes, not to speak of tuning the soul to the writing.
In reading as in speaking one must brace himself up, body,
soul, and spirit. It is a pleasure to know what discernment
the people show, and how keenly they enjoy good reading
1 it makes us see the meaning.'
The announcement of the text for the sermon exhibits
much ill -applied ingenuity. Ministers would do well to
remember that they are called to preach the Word of the
Living God, and that preaching is very different from ' some
remarks ' or ' ' a few observations/ et hoc genus omne.
There are many who speak of preaching as if it were not
worship. In respect of the hearer, surely there can be no
more worshipful spirit than is in the words, ' Speak, Lord,
for Thy servant heareth.' And in respect of the preacher,
what is the object of his preaching but to glorify God and
His Son Jesus Christ in the proclamation of the wonders of
the 'so great salvation/ and in ' bringing many sons unto
God ' ? If this be so and nothing less is required of us
can there be more real worship ]
We must impress on every one the inexpressible im-
portance of preaching. It can easily be underrated ; it
cannot be overrated. Nothing that contributes to its
excellence is to be thought lightly of. Some affect to
despise the speaking, and congratulate themselves on their
thinking. Of what use is the thinking if it cannot be
carried effectively home to others? And if it be so good,
does it not deserve to be well spoken 1 They speak lightly
of men who, as they think, notwithstanding poverty of
matter, produce by their speaking a greater impression than
THE PULPIT. 143
themselves. Do not such men rather put them to shame 1
They think meanly of people who seem to them blinded to
poverty of thought by speech which had no more commend-
able quality than force. But a missile of an ounce in weight
driven home accomplishes more than one of a pound weight
that cannot be discharged, or misses its mark. Not the
people, but those who thus criticise them are to be meanly
thought of. The people were right in preferring what told,
and they would have given their critics the highest place, if
with richness of suitable matter they had brought also all
the commendable qualities of speech in addition to force.
People delight in good matter well spoken good matter
being what is well suited for their edification. Whoever
would preach, let him resolve to preach as a messenger from
God a message from whom is always urgent and important,
and requires a man with his loins girded and so to preach
that no doubt need arise on the question, ' Whence was it ?
from heaven, or of men 1 '
Let it be well considered that in these days of increased
knowledge, when everything is printed, and most people
read, and so much has been heard from the pulpit, there
is more reason than ever for giving full effect to the power
of the living voice. Indifferent speaking of that which is
known adds nothing to it, perhaps detracts from it, and is
always wearisome and soporific. Good speaking is always
welcome and interesting even when it tells an 'old, old
story '; and it is the only means by which human power
can waken dormant knowledge and call it forth to action.
I should be afraid to treat it as an ordinary thing.
It has been said with truth that the average preacher can
hardly overrate the indifference of tue average hearer. Nor
need the general appearance of attention deceive, for many
Church influences conduce to that.
It does happen, though rarely, that one with faults
K
144 SPEAKING.
enough to undo most speakers can hold his audience
and carry them along with him, and we may hear it ac-
counted for by saying the power is in the magnetism of
the speaker. We have never seen a case in which a dis-
cerning and well-instructed observer found it necessary to
fall back on this easy and mysterious explanation. But let
it be so ; yet as the power of the magnet may be increased
or diminished, and its action impeded or aided, so it is
with the magnetic power credited to a speaker. Without
a doubt faults diminish and impede it, and therefore should
be laid aside. Let the poor in magnetism also be comforted,
for, if they are speaking that which is suitable, naturally
and earnestly, soul and body, in deep sympathy with their
hearers and with the subject, this will operate on their little
magnet like the coil of wire around the magnet of the
electrician, increasing its power as he will. Mr Frank T.
Bullen gives an account of a religious meeting and of two
of the addresses. One was by a captain in the American
army, 'a noble fellow, thrillingly earnest, but with a tre-
mendously rapid utterance and most involved style. His
speech made me wonder at myself for being so thick-headed
as not to understand a word of it.' Then, unawares called
upon, came a shipmate. 'Ah, that was a change indeed.
For Jem said in the simplest way that which the Lord
gave him to say, and the fact that he spoke in an alien
tongue . . . did not hinder his discourse being of the most
heart-searching kind. . . . Here was a man, . . . hardly able
to speak the language of his hearers, who had so gripped
the hearts of his audience that they wept, almost writhed,
under the fierce stress of their emotions. 7 In the first case
thrilling earnestness was unable to compensate for error in
delivery and style ; and, we may add, the speaker was sure
to be deceived as to the cause of the keen attentiveness of
Mr Bullen and probably the whole meeting. In the other,
THE PULPIT. 145
the question of language may be dismissed with the remark
that even if the good effect was aided by it, mis-utterance
of a language in which one is known to have been edu-
cated produces a very different effect. Need we fall back
on magnetism, or any other occult cause, to explain the
power of that address reproduced from memory by Mr
Bullen ? It seems obviously enough to lie in the speaker's
overpowering thankfulness and love to his God and
Saviour, and overpowering desire to commend them to
his hearers, expressed with a natural simplicity, directness,
and openness which brought the hearers into touch with
his very heart of hearts a heart which itself was in touch
with Godhead.
Controversy is not in the line of the pulpit's power. The
people come that they may be brought to the Saviour, or
kept in Him, and fed and led and encouraged and com-
forted by truth from on high. They have therefore no
pleasure in being made onlookers at a fight, except it be
as parties to the fight of the good against the evil within
themselves, in which they look eagerly for help. The same
may be said of speculation and much besides. The pulpit
must be positive if it would be powerful, proclaiming the
truth which belongs to it and trusting this truth to dispel
error as light dispels darkness, and to blend into harmony
with any truths that may come from other quarters.
It may be set down conclusively that the essay is by the
very nature of the case excluded from the pulpit. The
preacher is called and commanded to speak to the people
not to give off impersonal material in their presence and the
people come that they may be spoken to. Preachers, the
commissioned of Christ, are far greater than essayists or
moralists. Would that all our rising ministers, living in
the presence of their Lord on the cross and their Lord in
146 SPEAKING.
glory, would take their message from Him ! For His is
the only message which can restore man to a sense of God's
forgiving love, and give him life and a new heart the only
message which can turn into fact man's aspirations after a
better being here and hereafter. The deliverer of a message
from heaven, his preaching should be such as to uphold in
the hearers a due sense that the matters dealt with are
divine, and that it is God with whom they have to do
the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
Are divisions an advantage 1 Yes, with scarcely an excep-
tion. Two things might satisfy any young man of this : (1)
among the published sermons of those who are by common
consent held to have been successful preachers he can hardly
find an undivided sermon; (2) his own experience in the
pew is that, other things being equal, he finds it helpful
to have the sermon naturally divided. It helps one to
understand and to remember. On the other side we seem
to have only (a) the well-worn small fun as to 'firstly,'
' fifteenthly,' &c. ; (b) the case of some preachers who,
though not successful, are counted able, and speak in a
scholastic fashion ; (c) the fear of being thought old-
fashioned, and the wish to be thought of the l able '
class; (d) weakness or indolence, for it requires thinking
and some power of abstraction to map matter out well, and
it is easier to go dribbling on, annexing the last thing
that has turned up, and ending without point or force,
and of course without an attempt to aid the memory as to
the substance of what has been said, for this is impossible.
Dr Caird insisted on his students in divinity dividing their
sermons into heads. A good way is to take a subject and
study it in Scripture, gather and set forth the teaching of
the Word, and then go on from one distinctly stated point
to another in exposition and appeal. But, whatever the
method, care should be taken that, at least and worst, every
THE PULPIT. 147
point shall be clearly conceived, put in its proper place, set
plainly forth, and driven well home.
Unity among the various parts of a diet of public worship
is manifestly an element of power. Everything should as
much as possible co-operate in one aim. The end sought
by the preaching should also be felt in the praying. The
thoughts and feelings which it is desired to stimulate by
the enforcement of truth should have their expression in
the praise. Such harmony of the exercises requires that
they should all be controlled by one mind, and therefore
strikes at stereotyping prayer, or letting the passages to be
sung depend on another will than the preacher's.
There is a temptation greater at present than in any former
age to read too much and think too little. Some suffer from
a voracious and omnivorous appetite, some from the fashion-
able vanity of seeming to know every new book. They not
only spend much time unprofitably, but act prejudicially to
their power of thinking. Real effective thinking, thinking
with a purpose, demands concentration of mind ; but those
ways are fatal to concentration. The work that comes of
them is loose, scrappy, and powerless much of it being
unsubstantial notions that have taken the reader's fancy.
Others, more practical and wise, will at least spend some time
in what is called 'reading up' their subject; but even they
are apt to forget the vast difference between reading up and
thinking out. The preacher considering what may most
profitably follow his last sermon, or what the condition
of his hearers requires, or what the occasion has prepared
them for, or what ought to be preached 'by way of re-
membrance,' and seeking to get his message from his Lord,
should first give himself to prayerful study of Scripture, that
he may gather its whole bearing on the subject. After this
he may read, but, if before this he goes to a strong mind his
148 SPEAKING.
own will be overlaid by it, and the result will be not a
message from on high, nor even from himself, but from
another man. He cannot himself feel confidence in it, l for
he has not proved it.'
To think out for oneself is to untie knots with one's own
fingers ; it is to straighten the course and lay the rails, and
test the waggons and their connections and their contents.
To read the work of thinkers as a study in thinking is
good, but this will no more make one a thinker unless he
applies himself to thinking, than to study fine paintings
will make a painter. Much less will it make him a preacher,
unless his great subject of study is the Word of God which
furnishes the message, and his great purpose is to convey
that message to those that hear him.
It is not that men by their thinking may strike out
anything original. It is not that they should even at-
tempt or expect to do so ; already there is too much of
this attempt with its inevitable failure. But it is that, for
power in speaking, their minds should be full and active and
fresh and strong. Without such exercise it will deteriorate ;
with such exercise it will every day improve. All who
come under its influence will acknowledge it is so. Nor
does the speaker reap only from without, but the lively
pleasure with which the thoughts from the living fountain
sprung up in his mind while he studied, and made them-
selves his own, remains with him, and they reproduce that
pleasure as they spring from his mind to the minds of
others. And it may be added that, on occasions when the
thoughts of his people are causing them trouble, his well-
stored mind, self -discipline, and experience make him more
fit and able as a counsellor.
That preacher will have most power who can not only
preach well from a few words, but who also expounds and
applies considerable passages of Scripture. The study for
THE PULPIT. 149
this is the best spiritual exercise of an intellectual kind. It
enriches with Scripture truth and acquaints with Scripture
manner. And surely it cannot be questioned that the ex-
position (along with the application) of Scripture properly
done is the best spiritual nourishment. Its rareness now is
greatly to be deplored
That ministry alone is true to its appointed end whose
main purpose is to draw out into clear statement, support
by forceful argument, and impress by emotional pleading
what God has been pleased to say to men. To steep one's
self in the Bible is to have the secret of perpetual fresh-
ness. No preaching lasts like honest persistent elucidation
of Biblical truth. Learned and unlearned hunger after it.
It may seem strange that many ministers are scarcely
found referring at all to Scripture in support of what they
are preaching, and yet the people regard it as of infinitely
greater weight than any other authority. Such ministers
have need to consider whether they may not give the im-
pression that their own regard for its authority is not such
as it ought to be, and what may be the effect if, after a
time, the people should come to assign to it an inferior place
among authorities.
There should be no occasion to say that quotations from
Scripture, as from any other book, should be given correctly.
This is due to the author of the book and to the hearer;
and if the quotation is known, incorrectness will only reflect
on him who quotes, and will turn the mind of the hearer
aside to thinking of the blunder.
The preacher may be reminded that there is possibly not
a trait of human character that is not illustrated in persons
who appear on the page of Scripture, or anything in human
affairs that is not illustrated in theirs. He has only to make
their acquaintance, and he will have a vast gallery of por-
150 SPEAKING.
traits in which to find examples of all that is in man by
nature and grace, and of the quality of men's proceedings,
and of the providence of God.
A former part of this work (p. 113) has urged the use of
speech that may be easily followed, language that the hum-
blest may understand, and on this is frequently heard the
advice, ' Do not descend to your audience, but raise them.'
There is here a thoughtless and mischievous fallacy. If it
means raise them to higher linguistic attainments, then (1)
this is not the part of the pulpit ; and (2), if it were, we can
be raised to understand difficult language only by having it
explained. Such advice given to a schoolmaster would be
laughed at. If it means raise them in other respects, how
can that be done by language which they do not understand ?
But let it not be imagined that childishness or vulgarity
is ever to be tolerated. Nor are the thoughts to be little
though the language is to be simple. Two preliminary
essentials for simplicity of speech are clear thinking and
a strong desire to make the hearer understand easily and
perfectly.
The author has never ceased from saying with pain that
a great proportion of what is said from the pulpit is not
understood by a large number of the hearers. And now he
is gratified to find a prince of preachers, Dr McLaren of
Manchester, speaking out strongly to the same effect
giving it as an explanation why so many are unaffected by
our preaching. That which the least educated most easily
understand, the best educated may most admire.
There is a striking lesson for all in the fact that Lord
Chancellor Cairns, who frequently attended the meetings
of Mr Moody, the evangelist, confessed he had got a new
conception of preaching from him, and said to Lord Shaftes-
bury, ' The simplicity of that man's preaching, the clear
THE PULPIT. 151
manner in which he sets forth salvation by Christ, is to
me the most striking and the most delightful thing I ever
knew in my life.'
The sermons of that great preacher, Spurgeon, are good
examples in language. I may say that, although, as his son
informs me, he never wrote his sermons, both the thinking
and the language bear evidence of great carefulness.
Here it may be noted that objective has an advantage
over subjective or abstract language. Words that appeal to
knowledge acquired through the eye or bodily experience
present the thought more quickly and vividly. Scripture
throughout illustrates our meaning : ' A mighty hand and
an outstretched arm'; ' the shadow of Thy wings'; 'lest
thou dash thy foot against a stone ' ; ' the wicked flee when
no man pursueth ' ; ' keep my law as the apple of thine
eye ' ; * which of you by taking thought can add one cubit
to his stature ' ; no man shall ' pluck them out of My
hand ' ; ' I have stretched out my hands unto Thee.'
Questions are a powerful weapon, serving many important
uses. A question (1) may put in words the very inquiry
that is occupying the thought of the hearers, and thus call
their attention to receive the answer : f What advantage
then hath the Jew?' (Rom. iii.) ; or (2) may startle the
caviller by showing him that the question he is framing
has been foreseen, and summoning him to see the worth
of it: 'With what body do they come?' (2 Cor. xv.); or
(3) may be the strongest form of an assertion : ' What com-
munion hath light with darkness?' (2 Cor. vi.) ; 'Who is
he that will harm you 1 ?' (1 Pet. iii.); or (4) may, with
its answer, be the briefest, most striking, and inspiring way
of bringing out a truth : 'Who shall lay anything to the
charge 1' &c. (Rom. viii. 33, &c.) ; or (5) may prepare for a
great conclusion : ' What shall we then say to these things ? '
(Rom. viii.) ; or (6) may be a challenge exposing ignor-
152 SPEAKING.
ance or presumption (Job xxxviii., xxxix.) ; or (7) may
be the language of appeal: 'Why will ye dieV (Ezek.
xxxiii.); or (8) may rouse and arrest the careless: 'Will a
man rob God ? ' (Mai. iii.) ; ' How wilt thou do in the swelling
of Jordan?' (Jer. xii.). See also the questions put by Christ.
The manner in which the question is to be spoken, and the
kind of pause that should follow it, depend on the purpose
of it. In such as 7 and 8 the hearer should be made to feel
that his answer is waited for. Why is so effective an in-
strument so little used ] We should say, because it belongs
to speech of a hearty, grappling character, while the style
now affected is bookish and literary much to the loss of
the speaker's cause. Better, however, no question than one
that is weak or ill-placed; better never a question than a
known habit of questioning.
It is asked, What if my temperament shrinks from giving
expression even to what I feel to be the important and true
character of the language, thought, and feeling 1 The answer
is evident : You must master your temperament, or turn to
work in which it will not make you so undutiful and dis-
honest. But when I do not feel any moving interest or
earnestness, but am heartless and dormant, must I assume
the appearance without the reality : is it honest to use a
tone without the corresponding feeling? If you do not
consider the themes of the pulpit as of moving interest,
and calling for earnestness, it were better to beg than re-
main there ; but if the condition described is accidental and
contrary to your judgment and desire, then the dishonesty
is really in the present apathy, and it should be thrown off.
Is a servant at liberty to say, * My heart is not in my work
to-day ; I shall be dishonest if I work as if it were ' ? May
one say, * I feel surly and uncivil, therefore I must in
honesty be discourteous"? Are you at liberty to do in-
THE PULPIT. 153
justice to the message of God as you read it in Scripture,
or deliver it yourself, because of your mood?
Now Ave make a strong statement, and make it strongly:
There is notliing whatever that is worth being said in the
pulpit for its own sake. Everything is for the sake of the
people the men, women, and children, of all sorts and
conditions, with their common human nature, in the pew.
And, as Dr Joseph Parker has said, < there ought to be
at least one mouthful of bread for the very poorest who has
crept into the Father's house.' Even as Christ came for our
sakes, and all He did and said was for our sakes, so it is
still. The preacher who forgets this loses one main secret of
his power. And there can be no doubt that the neglect of
it accounts for a great deal of weakness. The weightiest
doctrine preached without a living interest in its bearing on
preacher and hearer is flat and unprofitable ; but that interest
gives it vitality and power. Indifference to the needs and
desires of the people may be illustrated by a single glaring
instance. Both the unconverted and the Christian are there ;
yet from beginning to end all are addressed as Christians,
and nothing is said that could be of the least help to the
others : they go as they came, uncared for. The thoughtful
Christian himself is sorry. So likewise the whole congre-
gation are sometimes addressed throughout as if they were
unconverted. The same unaccountable thoughtlessness is
seen in prayer also.
Here we must pause to ask whether ministers do not take
it too much for granted that the people in church, young and
old, have really entered on the Christian life by definite ac-
ceptance of Christ and surrender to Him. Have they 1 We
earnestly urge the need of frequently and faithfully ' doing
the work of an evangelist/ Experience proves that such
preaching, when freshly and really done, has also a wonderful
power in ministering blessing even to the ripest Christians.
154 SPEAKING.
Another obvious illustration of neglecting the needs of
the hearer occurs in a matter which bears alike upon all
together. The preacher has been dealing with some Chris-
tian virtue or some weakness. Perhaps he has been, as
is the modern fashion of some, backing himself, not by
Scripture, but by stories, and by moralists and poets and
writers of fiction, eking out his sermon with quotations which
nobody quite understands, but from which everybody may
judge of his wonderful reading ; but let us suppose that, by
whatever method, he has led the people to think about their
failures and weaknesses. To what good 1 It was unnecessary
for most of them to be brought to church for this. They
have felt it all at home, and on occasions much more sharply.
There is not a word to tell of help, or to bring them to a
more real and constant practical hold of the Helper, or
knowledge of being held by Him ; no Holy Spirit ; not a
word to quicken perseverance or hope. He has got no higher
than his literary friends. The sores of his people are probed,
but there is no balm in that pulpit.
To one who complained of preaching in which the re-
demption work of Christ, and His relation to saint or
sinner, receive but vague, useless, passing allusion, a young
man answered, ' We are not taught it ' as if these things
are not taught even in the Shorter Catechism, and as if any
man ought to think of entering the ministry unless he has
been taught them also by the Spirit of God, and is moved
above all things by the desire to impress them on others.
There are two great fundamental facts which, though
scarcely appreciable in contributing to the power of most
other speaking, are not only immeasurable in their effect on
the power of preaching but are essential to it, viz., the author-
ity of God in His revealed will, and the power of conscience
in man, with his sin, sorrow, and need. To these the
THE PULPIT. 155
preacher's mandate directs him as the basis of all his preach-
ing. If they do not receive his constant, reverential, sym-
pathetic attention, he is weak as well as undutiful to his
people and his Master.
But on the other hand, if he takes his stand on the
authority of God in His revealed will, and is an intelligent
and honest man, he cannot but speak with strong conviction ;
and if he has in mind the conscience and need of his hearer,
he cannot but speak with deep sympathy and tenderness, and
with care to be easily understood. Add to this the spirit
and manner of one who glows with pleasure in a work so
fraught with blessing to those for whom he cares, and then
we have the most important of the essential human elements
of power in the pulpit strong conviction, sympathetic desire
for the hearer's good, and pleasure in the work.
Let him see that in his preaching he founds the possibility
to 'live godly' and in ' everlasting consolation and good
hope ' only and always on union with Christ and the power
of the Holy Ghost.
Where is now to be heard from the pulpit the voice of
beseeching, entreaty, appeal to the hearers? There is no
substitute for it. Argument often tends rather to provoke
reply than to induce consent, and, according to the proverb,
may convince and leave the convinced of the same opinion
still. Every day there is proof in every department of life
that beseeching has succeeded where argument failed. It
may be said that appeal had made itself distasteful and in-
effective by being overdone and badly done; but any one
can answer this, which is heard in relation to most good
things, and can draw from it the inference that his duty
is to make sure that in his case it is not badly done, but
well done.
Are we asked to define more exactly what is meant by
156 SPEAKING,
beseeching or appeal 1 It is the cry of heart to heart. It is
the voice of profound longing. If it reasons, its thoughts
come from a heart that is deeply moved ; and their passing
through the intellect of the other on their way to the heart
is as when the spark darts through the electric wire. Its
tone cannot be mistaken. If he who has asked us to define
it has forgot his own childhood, let him listen now to children
in their frequent beseechings. Let him imagine having to
entreat some loved one to turn away from ruin, or to plead
that one who is dear to him may not be exposed to shame.
From the heart we would say to the young minister, Think
till the fire burns within you, think how God yearns over
your people with the love which gave His Son for them, and
has sent you as His ambassador to beseech them, and has
given them to you to love and care for, that you may present
them every one perfect in Christ Jesus. They desire to
regard you as speaking in the name of God ; let them have
no cause to wonder that they never find you pleading as He
would plead. The things of which we preach are of supreme
and eternal importance to them do not let them think
that you doubt it ; do not let them wonder that your love
never breaks out in earnest entreaty over that which con-
cerns them so deeply. Think of them one by one ; think
what you would not say or do to see it otherwise with some ;
think till your heart is full and longing, and let your heart
speak. As well-known illustrations of the character of appeal,
we might point to passages in Ruth i., Isaiah xl., lv., Ezekiel
xxxiii., Paraphrase xxx. ; but Scripture is full of it.
We would not be taken as meaning that appeal is only
for a great outpouring on special occasions, or that it should
be reserved to the end of the sermon. But every definite
truth in the sermon should be made to press in on the
conscience in view of character and life.
The time was when Mr Gladstone could say, and said
THE PULPIT. 157
with commendation, that the distinctive note of preaching
in the Scottish Churches was that of a wrestling with the
hearer.
Yet one other truth loudly claims to be heard, and should
be heard with thankfulness. The Holy Spirit can enrich in
all utterance. God giveth His Holy Spirit to them that ask
Him. Paul begged the prayers of the Ephesians that utter-
ance might be given to him. This gift of the Spirit will not
take the place of natural gifts, nor can it be expected to
supply the want of attainments caused by indolence and un-
faithfulness (though the abundance of grace may overflow
even all that) ; but this at least is certain, that, in answer to
prayer, taking us as He finds us, He will breathe upon us such
life and desire and freedom and power, and such faculty of
speaking for Him to others, as nothing in ourselves can attain
to. Let no one think to minister in the Gospel without
seeking constantly and earnestly this power from on high.
To do otherwise is to attempt the work of God with the
power of man. It is to reverse the words, ; Not by might
nor by power, but by My Spirit, saith the Lord of hosts/
Can it be the fact fearful if it is so that little prayer is
now to be heard for the Holy Spirit at all 1
If the preacher should live in ' an age of doubt/ as this is
said to be, or in an age of devilry, he should know that this
only increases, if that were possible, the obligation which
rests upon him to preach Faith and the risen and reigning
Lord, who came to destroy the works of the devil. This is
the distinctive part which has been assigned to the preacher
by the Most High.
'Let us pray,' and especially the last word, is to be heard
in certain quarters given in what may be thought the ecclesi-
astical mode. It might easily be described, but we refrain,
158 SPEAKING.
content to say that it is utterly unnatural ; and to he un-
natural is to he prohibited. In a less degree the same is true
of the oft-repeated words, ( through Jesus Christ our Lord.'
He on whom it falls to lead the prayers of a congrega-
tion cannot hut desire that no one should suffer loss because
of any shortcomings on his part. And in this we desire to
assist him. What has been said of the voice and of speech
generally is as applicable and important here as anywhere.
But there is additional matter having special reference to our
present subject ; for, as hitherto, we take speaking to embrace
spirit and matter and manner, and whatever conduces to the
end desired.
Such faults as the following have, not once nor twice,
come under the writer's own observation, and may be stated
as illustrative, (a) Frequent utterance of the name of God,
which is irreverent ; as also is a noisy, rough, or curt utter-
ance of it. (b) Addressing the Almighty always by the
same name, regardless that He has been pleased to make Him-
self known to us by many, each with its revelation of Him
more appropriate to certain contexts than to others, (c) Too
rapid or light-toned speech, which is irreverent, (d) The
frequent use of some pet expression or some neat sentence.
(e) Rambling : going backwards and forwards ; no natural or
spiritual or logical progression. (/) Sameness, as when one
at the beginning could rarely exclude the 'come before
Thee/ and after not many words always fell back on 'in
spirit and in truth/ with only the poorest rearrangement of
his commonplace words introducing it. (g) Too great vague-
ness ; and, on the other hand, too great minuteness, (h) Ill-
considered expressions, most frequently in confession e.g.,
We have not been thankful ; We do not trust Thee ; Our lives
have been full of wickedness. Many people know that this
is not their case, and must wonder what manner of man the
minister is. In all those subjects there is plenty of room for
THE PULPIT. 159
conviction and confession and penitence, but nothing is
gained by untruthful language, (i) Want of though tfulness
as to some main lines of difference in the spiritual condition
of the people present, so that some can find no place for
them in respect of that which mostly concerns them, or which
at least they know they ought to pray for. (j) It would be
well to listen to an order of the Jewish doctors that in the
synagogue 'Amen' be not pronounced hastily and swiftly,
but with a grave and distinct voice. By this word we are
understood to testify our desire to be heard, and our con-
fiding assurance that we shall be heard. But how many
are there whose utterance of it does not make the very least
suggestion of such a state of mind, sometimes rather the
contrary? Not infrequently now we hear one who omits it
entirely, trusting it to others whether they fulfil the un-
sought trust or not. Why should they more than he?
Why should he less than they? Surely it is a comfort, a
joy, to address to the Almighty a word filled full by us
of the meaning assigned to it in prayer by the Shorter
Catechism ' in testimony of our desire, and assurance to be
heard, we say Amen. 1
Those who say the Lord's Prayer should say it correctly
for example, not putting ' who ' for * which/ * on ' for ' in/
' each ' for l this,' ' day by day ' for ; this day,' omitting ' and,'
inserting ' and ever,' or the like. Are such things intended
to correct the translators, or St Matthew, or whom? Since
last edition I had the curious experience of hearing this
'in whose perfect words we farther pray/ followed by the
Lord's Prayer full of inaccuracies ! We take the lowest
ground in thinking that a quotation should be given with
strict accuracy, and especially where it is familiar to the
hearer. Let all guard also against prefatory expressions im-
plying that this prayer was commanded, or is the only perfect
praying, or the like.
1*
160 SPEAKING.
The Christian's view of the throne of grace includes as
living realities the new, blood-consecrated way to it, and the
Intercessor at the right hand, and the teaching and helping
of the Holy Spirit and His own pleading in our prayers.
The first spiritual act of prayer is to enter within the veil
into * the holiest/ the very presence of God. The minister
does this for himself, and he bears on his spirit his congrega-
tion with him.
And being now there, the soul is naturally and by grace
filled with reverence, humility, and sincerity, and with other
graces, such as faith and comfort, and with the deep satisfac-
tion of communing with God. This position, and the mental
and spiritual frame which belongs to it, will give the true
character to all the parts of prayer : adoration, profound and
reverential, giving with gladness the glory that is due to His
name ; confession, honest and sin-hating ; the prayer of great
and urgent need ; the thanksgiving of real gratitude for
loving-kindness undeserved ; intercession with the same love
for others as for ourselves, and happy in the fact that
God's love is greater still ; longing after holiness, as He
with whom we are communing is holy ; and so in any other
thing.
And what is his relation in all this to the congregation?
His words and the manner of their utterance not only convey
the knowledge of his thoughts and feelings, but they do more.
Words and tones, among those who are friendly, excite in
the hearer the feeling which they express ; and thus, if his
speech has given true expression of himself, the congregation
will be affected as he has been. This is the human side, on
which lies the minister's duty, and with which alone we are
dealing.
Let it be noted then that, not that which it was intended
or desired to express, but only that which is actually ex-
pressed, will determine the response of the congregation : it
THE PULPIT. 161
may be the mental and spiritual frame of the minister, or it
may be something else.
If never before, surely now there comes clearly out the
immeasurable importance to a minister of having so mastered
the instruments of speech and perfected his use of them that
they express with exact truth the thoughts and feelings
which seek expression. We write it in all affection, and in
profound sorrow that there are not a few within our know-
ledge who cannot so much as express the simple elementary
sentiment of reverence, cannot express earnestness, or come
within sight of a longing desire, or of the Scripture ' cry
unto the Lord.' Whether it be that the feelings are not
there, or that the power of expression has not been acquired,
is it not grievously undutiful 1
As for one's own soul, so for the ' two or three/ and so for
the many, there is no comparison between free prayer and
prayer read, or said from memory, for bringing men truly
into the Presence for communion, and for rendering spon-
taneous and unfettered worship, and opening the heart for
copious blessing. This statement is to be taken along with
all that is said in these paragraphs on prayer, for either
mental or spiritual un fitness makes free prayer a great trial
to a large part of the congregation.
Eespecting the language of prayer, there is one point on
which the man who really does pray, the man who has really
entered into the Presence, does not need advice, for in that
Presence he cannot, if he would, use other than simple and
direct language. Laboured sentences are abhorrent to him,
such as one now lying before the writer, part of which is an
interjection of the relative pronoun with nine lines belonging
to it, or one which, on the other hand, is well enough as a
piece of writing, and indeed might take the fancy as saying
a great deal in compact, good literary form ; yet when one
knows and feels himself in practical converse with God face
162 SPEAKING.
to face, such a manner of address feels utterly and most
objectionably out of place. One of the greatest lessons of
the Lord's Prayer is in its simplicity. All true prayer
speaks simply. It will, for example, address God very
sparingly as 'Who.' The growing practice of often using
such a form as ' Almighty God, who ' is wholly in the wrong
direction. It comes from the schools, and neither from
nature nor grace. The manner and comparative rareness of
its use in Scripture may teach us. Common experience
would attest that the more truly and earnestly a soul is
crying unto God in its own spontaneous words, with no
habit contracted from books, the less will there be of this
form. I cannot doubt that yesterday when prayer from the
pulpit began with ' God, who art our refuge and our
strength/ there was many a worshipper whose heart would
have gone forth more fully in thankful, restful, joyous trust
had the form, properly spoken, been, ' God, Thou art our
refuge and our strength.'
Books of devotion and books of prayers do not serve their
best use when they receive attention for the sake of their
language, and least of all when it is for the sake of appro-
priating their sentences. They are valuable when they stir
up the gift of prayer ; deepen our sense of nearness to God ;
quicken faith and earnestness and all the graces that con-
tribute to effectual fervent prayer ; prevent forgetfulness of
any proper subject of prayer ; give increased fulness, and
keep before our minds the great amount and variety of
human need, and the abounding, all-sufficient grace of God.
But above all, there must needs be much prayer for the
Holy Ghost.
The great educator and the exhaustless storehouse for
prayer is the Word of God. He who would do his duty
well in this part of the worship must have his mind saturated
with the thought and stored with the language of Scripture.
THE PULPIT. 163
He should particularly familiarise himself with the prayers
recorded there short as well as long and by whomsoever
uttered, including of course the Psalms. They are most
striking and instructive from their directness, simplicity,
depth of meaning and feeling, and nearness to God ; and
also in their exquisite touching and natural transitions from
one mood to another ; to all which must be added the im-
pressive appropriateness, weight, and euphony of the lang-
uage. There is nothing to compare with them ; and nothing
can be more appropriate in holy converse with God than the
very words of Scripture. All Scripture is of use to direct
us in prayer. There is but little of it which may not give
occasion for prayer and furnish the language. There is no
more valuable exercise than to make what we read the
ground of prayer. I cannot give my young readers kinder
or better counsel than to be much occupied with the Word
of God.
There is great variety among us in the way of pronounc-
ing the Benediction ; and perhaps uniformity is not to be
desired. The Benediction is a form of prayer. Some
think it is more, when pronounced by an ordained minister.
As it does not belong to this book to argue theology, it is
enough to say that we have never found any divine authority
for that view ; and we are very sure that a parent, unaffected
by views held outside of our Church, would rather over the
head of his child see the hand and hear the words, * The
Lord bless thee, my child/ from the unordained man whose
effectual fervent prayer availeth much, than the hand and
words of one whose principal qualification is ordination.
We believe it is admitted that no one among us ever truly
pronounces the Benediction unaccompanied with sincere
heart-prayer, and this common ground is enough for our
present purpose. In practice it is the fact that some use
164 SPEAKING.
the prayer as for the congregation only, saying, for example,
* Grace be with you' ; some as including themselves, * Grace
be with us.' In the former case the natural attitude would
obviously be the minister looking on the congregation with
outspread arms and the palms downwards. In the latter
case this would as obviously be inappropriate, and the proper
attitude may be regarded as being partially upturned eyes
and arms and palms expressive of earnest and confident
expectancy in this summary and last act of the worship.
The utterance of the Benediction is referred to on page 26.
For a form of words we naturally turn to the New Testa-
ment, and there the fullest is that which concludes the
Second Epistle to the Corinthians. In this it is a frequent
mistake to say ' our Lord ' for ' the Lord,' which implies
very much more. We would say then : The grace of the
Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion
of the Holy Ghost be with you [or us] all. Amen.
165
PAKT VII.
STAMMERING. 1
WE assume that the student of this Part has made himself
acquainted with at least Parts I. IV. It may be taken as
established that in all ordinary stammering there is want of
co-operation between the voice-producing cords in the larynx
and the word-modelling organs of the mouth, and that it is
the voice-production that lags behind. Dr Wyllie, in his
1 Disorders of Speech,' aptly compares it to violin-playing in
which the bow hand fails to use the bow while the other
hand vainly presses the harder upon the strings. This is
actually to be seen in first lessons on the violin, when the
pupil, intent on the placing of his fingers, neglects to ply
the bow.
From the exactness, rapidity, and ease with which the
1 For their sakes in sympathy with whom this Part is designed it
may be well to state that it is not based merely on a very careful gen-
eral study of the subject, but cases to the number of ten not to say
more have received special attention in connection with this work.
All were cases of persons of intelligence. Four were men of education
(two of them being in the learned professions), and two were educated
ladies. Of those a lady and a minister had mastered the defect, and
frankly gave me the benefit of their experience. To the latter the
original manuscript of the Part was submitted before publication, and
he was pleased to say that, much as he had read on the subject, this
was the best treatment of it he had seen, and that he could suggest
nothing for its improvement.
166 SPEAKING.
good player executes the perpetually changing combinations
in the movements of his hands and fingers we get some idea
of what is required of the organs of speech. In truth, the
production of speech demands such swiftness and delicacy of
co-ordinated action of the parts that the wonder is there are
not more instances of failure. In the difficulty of the per-
formance lies the explanation of the great amount of slovenly,
indistinct speaking that exists, for it leads the careless and
indolent, omitting and blurring as they go, to shuffle along
in the easiest way they can. Thousands are more difficult
to follow than the stammerer, and ought to be more
ashamed of themselves ; only, though they give great annoy-
ance, they do not in their blissful ignorance add to the pain
of the hearer by exhibiting distress themselves.
In stammering of the common variety the speaker neglects,
or goes a little ahead of, the action of the vocal cords. Then
in the disappointing, disconcerting absence of voice he un-
consciously throws increased force into some part of the
mechanism outward from the cords, where it struggles vio-
lently to effect the impossible. This produces one or more
of those spasmodic movements in various parts which some
have taken for causes instead of effects. Some of those
struggles dam up the breath by shut lips or otherwise, so
that the cords cannot give voice, because a current cannot
pass through them.
What, then, may be the beginning of this failure in co-
ordination, whatever its particular form ; and what, where it
exists, will make it more troublesome at one time than an-
other? (a) In childhood and even boyhood it may be com-
menced by imitation ; or (b) by inducing children in thought-
less play to attempt combinations of sounds or words too
difficult for them, (c) It may accidentally occur, as in an
outburst of crying, and thus be discovered to be a means
of gaining an end, and therefore be repeated as occasion re-
STAMMERING. 16 AND SONS.
BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
A DIGEST
OF
LAWS AND DECISIONS,
ECCLESIASTICAL AND CIVIL,
RELATING TO THE
CONSTITUTION, PRACTICE, AND AFFAIRS
OF THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND.
/
With Explanatory Notes and Forms of Procedure.
By EBV. WILLIAM MAIK, M.A., D.D.,
Lately Minister of the Parish of Earlston.
THIRD EDITION. WITH SUPPLEMENT.
Crown 8vo, 12s. 6d. net.
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD & SONS, EDINBURGH AND LONDON.
THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE
STAMPED BELOW
AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS
WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN
THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY
WILL INCREASE TO 5O CENTS ON THE FOURTH
DAY AND TO $1.OO ON THE SEVENTH DAY
OVERDUE.
'1932
j2Ju!'58Pf
IN STACKS
JUN181958
21958
LD 21-50m-8,-32