ct^kWv THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES GIFT OF Charles Perm [KUGLEE'S HAND-BOOK OF PAINTING.] SCHOOLS OF PALNTING IN ITALY. TRANSLATED. FEOM THE GEKMAN OF KUGLEE, BY A LADY. EDITED. WITH NOTES, BY Sm CHARLES L. EASTLAKE, P.R.A., P.R.S. WITH UPWARDS OF ONE HUNDRED ILLUSTRATIONS, DRAWN ON WOOD, BY GEORGE SCHARF, JÜN., PROM THE WORKS OF THE OLD MASTERS MENTIONED IN THIS BOOK, ENGRAVED BY JOHN THOMPSON AND SAMUEL WILLIAMS. SECOND EDITION, THOROUGHLY REVISED, WITH MUCH ADD1T10X.\L MATTER. IN TWO PARTS.— PART II. LONDON : JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1851. Printed by W, Clowes & Sons, Stamford Street. Art Library BookV. INTRODUCTION. |Yü 271 — _ BOOK V. '^,1^ PEEIOD OF HIGHEST DEVELOPMENT AKD DECLTXE. MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. INTRODUCTION. All the elements which had existed apart from each other and had composed distinct st^des in the periods hitherto con- sidered, all the qualities which had been successively deve- loped, each to the exclusion of the rest, but which in the aggregate fulfilled the conditions of a consummate practice of Art, were united about the beginning of the sixteenth century. This union constituted a most rare and exalted state of human culture — an era wlien the diviner energies of human nature were manifested in all their purity. In the master-works of this new period we find the most elevated subjects, represented in the noblest form, with a depth of feeling never since equalled. It was only for a short period that Art maintained this high degree of perfection — scarcely more than one quarter of a century ! But the great works then produced are eternal, imperishable. They bear, indeed, the stamp of their own age, but are created for all ages ; and as they were the pride and admiration of the time when they were produced, so they will awaken the enthusiasm of the latest posterity. For the truly beautiful depends not on external or local circumstances ; the Madonna di S. Sisto of Raphael, the Heroes of Phidias, Leonardo's Last Supper, and Scopas's group of the Niobe and her Children, belong not exclusively to Catholic Italy, nor to heathen Greece. In all places, in all times, their power must be felt, and must produce its impression on the heart of the spectator. At the first glance it seems surpi-ising that in this most flourishing period of modern Art there should appear no single 94584ii 272 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEN'TURY. Book Y. supreme representative, as a prouiiuent centre, to which all the others tenil like the radii of a circle ; no highest consum- mation which can be considered as the term — the keystone, as it were, of this wondrous buildin;;. On the contrary, many individuals, many works of Art of various kinds, all equally estimable, are presented to our view. Even artists not espe- cially gifted, have, in this favoured time, produced some works of high perfection ; and although criticism may here and there detect external deficiencies, the same spirit of divine beauty breathes from them all ; they still afford a higher gratification to the mind than the works of any other period, either earlier or later. But such is the essence of beauty, it is confined to no fixed canon, it pervades life in its whole extent, and may still be conceived freely, and represented in a freelj'^ created form, by the gifted artist, according to his individual feeling. Its principle is that of the. sunbeam, which though broken into various colours by the prism, is, in each portion, equally saturated with light. Thus, in the period we now approacli, we shall find several prominent groups, each of which, in cultivating peculiar qualities, produced the grandest works. We shall become acquainted with the individual masters who foini the centres of these groups, and whose characteristics hav« been impressed more or less forcibly on their scholars and imitators. The general course of history which is coincident with this wonderful epoch of Art, would seem, at first sight, to wan-ant no such high residts. The period was one totally unfavour- able to the political interests of Italy. It was the time of the Leagues, and of the shallowest experimental policy that ever liad been known At that time foreign dominion estal)lished itself once and for ever in the land. But the highest develop- ment of art is not immediately dependent on the position of the State. Besides the conquerors and the politicians, who at that time disordered all its spiings, Italy fortunately possessed princes like Pope Julius II., and magistrates like Pietro Soderini, who were keenly alive to those real and lasting- benefits which a country derives from Art. She possessed also rich corporations who gave form and object to the aspira- tions of a painter, while they guaranteed his daily existence ; Book V. rs^TRODUCTTOX. 273 and finally she possessed a people in whom a feeling for all that was great and beautiful had been excited, and who were, at that time, conscious of being the first nation in the world. Any endeavour to trace the state of Italian civilization of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, in its proper relation as the basis of Art, would lead us too far into historical questions. Some remarks, however, may be permitted. We are much accustomed to reoard only the immoral aspect of the Italv of th^t day, forgetting the infinite freshness and elasticity of the people, that indestructible juvenility from whicli the iipper classes of the nation were constantly receiving new sources of moral life. Though the manners, here and there, were sunk in the deepest depravity, yet civilization might be said to flourish in the truest sense of the word. Then arose among the people not only a common consent, but a positive love for the beautiful and diijnified in life : for that which, since the decline of the ancient world, had appeared to slumber, and which now set its high stamp alike on literature, poetry, and manners, on the artistic enhancement of every accessory of life, as well as on the free urbanity of social intercourse. A style of architecture now appeared, combined from tlie remi- niscences of antiquity and the requirements of the day. which, however it may show the want of that inward principle which accompanies all derived and composite creations (such, for example, as the Italian language itself), developed a new beauty in form and a new harmony of proportion. This was the time, therefore, for sculpture and painting to flourish in their fullest freedom and grandeur. The epoch of ecclesiastic- political strife had passed away, leaving a certain indiflerence behind it, and even the church no longer required art to minister to edification as such, but rather to supply that beautiful and living type of form which is in itself the symbol of the High and the Infinite. In addition to this, profane and classic art had come greatly into vogue. In the province of art, as well as in every other belonging to Italian civiliza- tion, respect for antiquity became an element of the highest importance. Poetry and the plastic art were now enriched by subjects and models of indisputable normal value. It is admirable, too, to observe the freedom and independence with N 3 274 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY, Book Y. which the great men of the day availed themselves of this assistance. We find no traces of laborious copyings— Done were needed by a race who had themselves acquired every detail of plastic form afresh. The period of Raphael was not indebted in the first instance to the antique, but rather felt itself marvellously inspired by its spirit ; and borrowing from it not the merely national and accidental, but the immutable and the infinite, it was itself enabled to reproduce the im- mutable and the infinite likewise. CHAPTER I. LEONARDO DA VINCI AND HIS FOLLOWERS. At the head of this new period stands Leonardo da Vinci.' His works are the first which afford complete satisfaction to the eye and mind, for although contemporary with many of the artists already mentioned, he was not. like them, confined to one direction. Leonardo was born in the year 1452, at Vinci, a castellated village in the Val d'Arno ; he died in France, in 1519. Distinguished alike by gifts of body and mind, he appears to liave possessed an unparalleled versatility, united with indefatigable zeal in extending his inquiries and enlarging the sphere of his attainments. He was handsome, well-formed, and endowed with surprising bodily strength ; he was master of all the knightly exercises of riding, dancing, and fencing ; as an architect he constructed several edifices, particularly in Milan, and left designs for others. He was a sculptor, painter, musician, and poet ; he applied himself zealously to all the sciences necessary to the improvement of Art, particularly anatomy (both of men and horses), mathe- matics, perspective, mechanics, etc. ; he has also left several 1 0. Amoretti, Memorie .Storiche sii la vita, gli studj e le opere di Lionardo da Vinci, Milano, 1804. — L. da Vinci, by Hugo Count Gallenberg, Leipzig, 1834. — A mediocre translation of the last, with some extracts from German authors. — Brown, The Life of L. da Vinci, London, 1828. — Outlines in Landon. — Vies et (Euvres, etc., t. L. da V. The engravings by Fumagalli, — Scuola di Lionardo da Viiui in Lombardia, Milano, 1811 ; areveiy important for Leonardo and his school. Chap. I. LEONARDO DA VIXCI AXD HIS FOLLOWERS. 275 works on physics. Descriptions of playful mechanical con- trivances have been preserved, with which he amused himself and others ; he invented all kinds of machines for swimming, diving, and flying ; a compass, an hygrometer, etc. Some of his schemes were grander and more important ; for example, that of cutting a canal to unite Florence with Pisa : the actual completion of similar works occupied much of his time else- where. Another plan — bold, but for him not impossible, was to raise tlie ancient baptistery or church of S. Giovanni at Florence from the ground, by a sub-structure, to do away with the somewhat sunken appearance, which has so unpleasing an effect in this otherwise beautiful building. Finally, we must not omit his exertions and numerous inventions in mili- taiy architecture. But the centre of all the various powers of this great man was his prevailing love for the plastic arts — for painting espe- cially, to which he dedicated the greatest and best part of his active life. His anatomical studies have been already men- tioned. The same zeal which he applied to the study of mere form was extended to all its manifestations of life. None could be more eager, more quick, in observing and seizing the expressions of the passions, as they are displayed in counte- nance and gesture. He visited all the most frequented places, the scenes where the active powers of man are most fully developed, and he drew in a sketch-book, which he always carried with him, whatever interested him.' He followed criminals to execution, in order to witness the pangs of the deepest despair ; he invited peasants to his hovise, and related laughable stories to them, that he might learn from their physiognomies the essence of comic expression. Inanimate nature he studied with the same earnestness. Of his various writings on Art, the ' Trattato della Pittura ' has descended to our times, and still forms a very useful compendium. If this disposition to careful study shows the sure foundation on which the style of Leonardo is based ; if a just conception and characteristic representation of what was before him are ' Single heads and caricatures are still to be seen in different collections. Others are preserved to us by the engravings of W. Hollar and Jac. Sandrart. See the German translation of Vasari, vol. iii. p. 16. 276 ^[ASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. To be considered as the elements of his ])ractice, he tlisplays on the other hand a profound subjective feeling, a refined, enthu- siastic sentimentality, which in some sort may be compared with the characteristics of the Umbrian school. In some of his works one or other of these two tendencies predominates ; in his principal ones, on the other hand, both seem to balance each other in the purest harmony, elevated to so hig-h a degree (jf perfection by this union of the power of thought w ith the feeling for beauty of form, that Leonardo is justly entitled to take one of the first places among the masters of modern Art. He who investigated common life even to its minutest modi- fications and details, could also represent the holy and divine witii a dignity, calmness, and beauty of which the greatest genius only is capable. Leonardo was the natural son of a certain Pietro, a notary of the Signoria of Florence, by whom he was placed in the school of Andrea Verocchio. From tiiis master he must have derived his inclination for the double study of sculpture and painting. The Baptism of Clirist, in which an angel done by the scholar is said to have deterred the master from the piac- tice of painting, has been already mentioned (p. 214). Little is known of other early works of Leonardo. It is related that he once painted a fabulous monster, and made studies for it from toads, serpents, lizards, bats, etc., of which he had a wiiole menagerie ; his own fatlier drew back in fear from the horrible picture, but afterwards sold it at a high price. He also painted a head of Medusa, lying on the earth amidst all sorts of reptiles : it is supposed to be the same now in the gallery of the ülfizj at Florence ; it seems, however, more probable that this is a later but very excellent copy of the original.' This picture, which is deficient in marking as compared with Leonardo's usual style, is still very masterly in many respects ; the faded, sallow colour, tlie dark vapour issuing from the muuth, the convulsion of deatii in the glassy, fixed, expiring eyes, are all powerfully expressed. Two car- toons of his early time were particularly famous : one repre- sented Neptune, in a stormy sea, surrounded by nymphs and tritons ; the other, the Fall of Man, in a beautiful and elabo- I Kumohr, Ital, Forsch., ii. 307. Chap. I. LEOXARDO DA VIXCI AXD HIS FOLLOWERS. 277 rate landscape to represent Paradise : neither of these exist. It is ditficult to decide with regard to other early productions ascribed to Leonardo da Vinci ; a ciitical investigation of his works has as yet been only partially undertaken ; by far the greater part of those which bear his name in galleries are later imitations or the work of his scholars. Besides a Ma- donna, with a vase of water with flowers, in the Borghese Gallery (which, however, was no longer there in 1846), we must mention two portraits existing in Florence — the one that of a youth in the gallery of the Uflizj ; the other that of Ginevia Beiici, in the Pitti Palace, an unpretending but intel- ligently conceived pictui-e of the greatest decision and purity of drawing and modelling. In the year 1482 Leonardo was invited to the court of Lodovico Sforza il Moro, then regent, afterwards Duke, of Milan. This prince, although an usurper, showed the greatest zeal in cherishing learning and Art : in this course he followed alike his own inclination and the example of otlier Italian sovereigns. Learned men, poets and artists were invited to his court, and Leonardo, according to Vasari, recommended himself at first as a musician and improvisatore. The founda- tion of an academy of Art, the earliest establishment of the kind,' was soon entrusted to him : his works on Art * appear to have been composed for it ; and the numerous scholars whom he formed in Milan bear testimony to his great efficiency in this institution. Of the various undertakings conducted by Leonardo for Lodovico Sforza, we shall turn our attention to those only which have reference to the formative arts. Two are espe- cially remarkable ; they employed him during the greater part of his stay in Milan (till 1499). One was an equestrian statue, intended to have been cast in bronze, of colossal dimensions, in memory of Francesco Sforza, father of Lodo- ' [According to Rieha, Notizie Istoriclie delle Chiese Florentine (Firenze, 1754-1762), vol. viii. p. 191, the Florentine Academy is much older, since it dates from the time of Giotto. — Ed.] =^ Trattato della Pittura. A great number of edicious. The first appeared in Paris, 1651, with a life of Leonardo, by Raphael Dufresne. The best is that of Rome, 1817; GugL Manzi. There are several French and German translations. 278 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Bock V. vico. Leonardo liad made the profoundest anatomical studies for the horse. When the first model of tlie monument was finished, it was carried in a festal procession, as the most splendid part of the pomp, and was unfortunately broken. With unwearied patience Leonardo began a new one, but from tlie want of means — a want which pressed upon Lodovico in the latter years of his government — it was never cast ; and when Milan was conquered by the French, in 1499, the model was made to serve a^ a target by the Gascon crossbo\\men. His second great work was the Last Supper, painted in the refectory of the convent of S. Älaria delle Grazie, on a wall 28 feet in length, the figures being larger than life.' The fate of this inimitable picture is not less tragical than that of the statue. Had it been practicable, as Francis I. desired, to break down the wall and carry the painting into France, sixteen years after it was finished, it might have been pre- served perhaps to our day. The determination of Leonardo to execute the woi'k in oil-colours instead of fresco, in order to have the power of finishing the minutest details in so great an undertaking, appears to have been unfortunate. The con- vent, and probably the wall on which the picture is painted, were badly constructed, and the situation of the wall between the kitchen and refectory was far from favourable. An inun- dation, too, happened in Milan in 1500, owing to which the refectory remained for a time partly mider water, and the bad masonry of the hall, already predisposed to damp, was com- pletely ruined. From these and other circumstances the colours had entirely faded, as early as the middle of the six- teenth century. In 1652 a door was broken open, under the figure of the Saviour, which destroyed the feet. Under a false pretext of giving it a coat of varnish, the picture was entirely painted over in 1726 by an unfortunate bungler named Belotti. In 1770 it was retouched a second time by a certain Mazza, from whose miserable work three heads only were sa\ ed. In 1796, when Napoleon led the French over the Alps, he gave express orders that the room should be respected. Succeeding generals disregarded these orders : the refectory was turned ' Gius. Bossi, Del Cenacolo di Lionai-do da Vinci, Milano, 1810. — Goethe's Works, xsxix. 97. Chap. I. LEONARDO DA VIXCI AXD HIS FOLLO\MiRS. 279 into a stable, and afterwards into a magazine for hay, etc. Now, when the ruins of the picture only exist, a custode has been appointed, and a scaftblding erected to admit of closer examination — not of Leonardo's work, for almost all trace of it has disappeared, but of its sad vicissitudes and of the out- rages which have been committed upon it. As the original is all but lost to us, the cartoons which Leonardo sketchefl of the single heads, before he executed them in the large size, are of the greatest interest, as are also the copies executed for various other places, partly by his scholars, partly even under his own immediate direction. The cartoons are executed in black chalk, and slightly coloured : the Head of Christ is in the Brera at jMilan ; ten Heads of the Apostles, some of them of enchanting beauty, are in the collection of the King of Holland at the Hague ; three others in private collections in England. Several slight sketches are in the Academy at Venice ; an original drawing, a study for the whole composition, is in the Royal collection of drawings at Paris. Among the numerous more <>r less accu- rate copies, those by Marco d'Oggione, a scholar of Leonardo, are particularly distinguished ; one of these in oil, the size of the original, was formerly in the Certosa at Pavia. and is at present in the Academy in London ; another is in the refectory of the convent at Castellazzo, not far from Milan. There have been many modern attempts, aided by these materials, to restore the composition of Leonardo in a worthy manner ; among these may be mentioned the engraving of Raphael Morghen, and (more especially) the cartoon of the Milanese painter Bossi, the size of the original, now in the Leuchtenberg gallery at Munich. From this cartoon Bossi painted a copy in oil, to be repeated in mosaic. The mosaic is at Vienna, in the Ambras Gallery. By these means a general idea at least of Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper has been preserved. We perceive, in the first place, that the traditional style of composition handed down from an earlier period is adhered to ; the assembled guests sit on the further side of a long narrow table, Christ being seated in the middle — the most dignified of all arrangements, unless we give up the idea of a repast, like, for example, Luca Signorelli and Fiesole, who 280 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEXTURY. Buok V. rather represented the Sacrament of the Eucharist. The arrangement seems, moreover, particularly suitable to the refectory of a convent, where the monks are seated exactly in the same manner, and where the picture, placed opposite to their tables, connects itself with their circle, but is exalted above them by the higher situation and greater size of the figures. This mode of composition, which betrayed the earlier artists into a disagreeably stiff' and monotonous representation, and seems so unfavourable to the development of an animated action, is here enlivened in the most \'aried manner, while a most naturally imagined connection reduces it to an harmonious whole. The figure of Christ forms the centre ; he sits in a tranquil attitude a little apart from the others ; the Disciples are arranged three and three together, and they form two separate groups on each side of the Saviour. These four groups in their general treatment indicate a certain corre- spondence of emotion, and a harmony in movement, united however with the greatest variety in gesture and in the ex- pression of the heads. The gradations of age, from the tender youth of John to the grey hairs of Simon ; all the varied emotions of mind, from the deepest sorrow and anxiety to the eager desire of revenge, are liere portrayed. The results of Leonardo's careful studies in physiognomy, the power of ex- pressing a definite idea and word by means of the countenance and movements of the hand, are here displayed in highest mastery. The well-known words of Christ, " One of you shall betray me," have caused the liveliest emotion in the sorrowing party. Christ himself, his hands extended, inclines his head gently on one side with downcast eyes. A sketch for the head of Christ, on a now torn and soiled piece of paper, preserved in the gallery of the Brera, expresses the most elevated serious- ness, together with divine gentleness, pain on account of the faithless disciple, a full presentiment of his own death, and resignation to the will of the Father ; it gives a faint idea of what the master may have accomplished in the finished picture. The two gi'oups to the left of Christ are full of impassioned excitement, the figures in the first turning to the Saviour, those in the second speaking to each other ; horror, astonish- Chap. I. LEOXARDO DA VIXCI AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 281 ment, suspicion, doubt, alternate in tlie various expressions : on the other hand, stilhiess, low whispers, indirect observation, are the prevailing expressions in the groups on the right. In the middle of the first group sits the betrayer, a cunning, sharp profile; he looks up hastily to Christ, as if speaking the words, " Rabbi, is it I ?" while, true to the Scriptural ac- count, his left hand and Christ's right hand approach, as if unconsciously, the disli that stands between them. It has already been remarked that great uncertainty jjrevails about many of the works ascribed to Leonardo, and that by far the greater part are the works of his scholars. Leonardo could never satisfy himself: he painted slowly, and left many works unfinished, which is also accounted for by the many interniptions to his artistic life. Those ideas and conceptions, nevertheless, to which his mind gave birth, however slight in form, were sufficient to occupy the labours of a whole school, and to imprint on it the stamp of his genius. The entire series of his original inventions is only known by the works of his scholars. We shall in the following pages mention only the more important of them. Among the smaller pictures executed by Leojiardo in Milan, the portraits of two ladies beloved by Lodovico Sforza, Cecilia Gallerani and Lucrezia Crivelli, are particularly celebrated ; the first is said to be in Milan, the second in Paris. This latter is that earnest and exquisitely beautiful head called " La l)elle P'erroniere." ' Though jjear- ing traces of that severe school which reminds us of the art of the fifteenth century, it is of unusual delicacy of modelling, and at the same time free from that artificial effect of chiaro- scuro which belongs to the less pleasing side of Leonardo's school. In the collection of the Ambrosian Gallery at Milan is a series of very interesting small works. Among them may be distinguished the portraits of Lodovico and his wife painted in oil, in the early and rather severer manner of the artist : also some portraits sketched in crayons ; among these, a Head of a Lady with downcast eyes is in the highest degree charming yet dignified. Also the half-length figure of a youthful John the Baptist (in the Louvre), belonging probably ' [Dan, in his Tresor de Fontaineblean, published in 1642, calls this a Duchess of Mantua. See Dr. Waagen, Kunstwerke in Paris, 1839. — Ed.] 282 MASTERS OF THPJ SIXTEENTH CEXTURY. BookV. to the earlier period of the master. A very decided effect of chiaroscuro is, however, here aimed at, with an expression of enthusiastic ecstasy, WTOught up to a pitch which borders on the sentimental. One of Leonardo's most famous pictures, La Carita — a Mother with several children — also belongs to the period of his residence in Milan ; it was formerly in the old gallery at Cassel, and is now come to light again, as it appears, in the gallery of the Hague. It formerly represented a naked figure of Leda, standing, with the two children — some scruples of decorum have converted it by over-paintings into a Charity.' Besides these, there are many excellent originals of Leo- nardo's in Milan and the surrounding country, as well as numerous copies of the same subjects by his scliolars, which attest his full employment in that city. Among these is a Madonna and Child, fonnerly in the possession of the Araciel family. The Madomia holds tiie child with both hands ; he reaches his hand to her chin, as if to kiss her ; his face is still turned to the spectator, towards whom she also looks, as she bends down her head. The expression of the whole is fasci- nating, and the picture beautifully finished. A half-figure of a Mater Dolorosa, too, is grand and noble, \\ ith the most touching expression.* ' Rumohr (Drei Reisen iu Italien, p. 70) says of this picture, — " In this work, of which I have a lively recollection, I distinctly recognise the scholar of Verocchio, and the companion of Lorenzo da Credi, whose children these much resemble ; only that there is more intelligence here in every part — more depth of character and expression. In the countenances of the mother and the children, especially of the little one upon her aim, there is an expres- Biou of grief and longing which I cannot describe. The picture was called a Carita. Italian painters of later times have represented similar groups imder the same name, but always m the foi-m of a mother delighting iu the bloomincr oflspiing around her Leonardo, however, seems to have departed from this obvious sentiment. It was his nature to overlook that which lay nearest to him. He either intended, by the mournful and longing expression he has given to the group, to allude to the idea of the lost Paradise, or he had some other mystical thought in view, to which those who afterwards adopted the subject had lost the key. As far as I remember this picture was painted in oil. For this reason, and also because Vasari makes no mention of it, I am inclined to consider it a production of his Jlilanese time. The opaque, violet, local colour of his carnation agrees with the poi-traits of Lodovico Sforza and his wife, which are in the Ambrosiana Galleiy at Jlilan." See also a notice by Passavant, Kunstbl., 1844, p. 118. * On both compositions, see Fumagalli, Scuola di Leonardo, &c., before quoted. Chap. I. LEONARDO DA VIXCI AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 283 '1 lie composition of a Holy Family by Leonardo (la Vierge au bas relief) is frequently found repeated in this neighbour- hood. The original, it appears, is in England. The Madonna holds the infant Christ on her lap, and embraces the little St. John, who kneels with folded hands to receive the blessing and caresses of Christ. In the background on the right stands Joseph, with folded arms ; his aged head, with a somewhat exaggerated expression of joy, is finished to excess ; on the left is Zacharias.' In the Hermitage at St Peter^burgh there is a similar composition, with the exception of the little St. John ; a figure of St. Catherine is also introduced in the place of Zacharias. This latter picture was executed 1513, during Leonardo's later residence in Rome. After the conquest of Milan Leonardo returned to Florence, his native city, and remained there some years : to this period belong some important works. The first, executed directly after his arrival, a cartoon of the Holy Family (called the "Cartoon of St. Anna"), when publicly exhibited, was the admiration of the whole city. The Virgin is holding the child on her lap. who is turning towards the little Baptist. St. Anna, who is sitting by, is looking with ecstasy at the Virgin, and pointing upwards, as if to indicate the divine origin of the infant. The grace of the cliikheu, the blissful expression of the grandmother, and, above all, the lovely modesty and humility on the countenance of the Virgin, are wonderfully given. The original cartoon, executed in black chalk, and in good preservation, is in the lioyal Academy in London.* Pictures by Leonardo's scholars, from this or some similar composition, are frequent. The best of them — gene- ' Passavant, Kunstreise, p. Ill ; engraved by Förster, 1835. A copy in the Brera at Milan is ascribed in Fumagalli's work to Cesare da 8esto. — [The picture above mentioned, formerly in the possession of Messrs. Wood- burn, is now the property of the Earl of Wai'wick. One ann of the infant Christ (not of the Virgin) is round the St. John. — Ed.] * [Parts of this drawing (for example, the lower portion of the figure of the infant Christ) have either been efl'aced by time, or were originallv un- finished : the cartoon is now kept under a glass. The pictures to which the author alludes — no less than four exist in various collections — -appear to have been done from a difl'erent composition ; at all events Vasari's descrip- tion corresponds only with the drawing in question. Hence the best con- noisseurs have concluded that this is the cartoon which was so celebrated in Florence. !See Dr. Waagen, Kunstwerke in Paris, p. 426. — Ed.] 284: MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. rally, though erroneously, ascribed to Leonardo himself — is in the Louvre. Here the Virgin is seated on the lap of St. Anna — a playful, but at first siglit strange representation of a sacred scene, which would lead to the conclusion that there was an affinity between the minds of Leonardo and Correggio. The well-known refined type of his female lieads, with the small chin and the gracefcd smile, sometimes approaching to a coquettish expression, is rather mannered in this picture, though the original cartoon is free from all such tendency, and is of the highest nobility of sentiment. A second larger cartoon, executed by Leonardo in Florence, and described as one of the greatest master-pieces of modern Art, shared the fate of his equestrian statue and Last Supper. It was a commission from the city, and executed in compe- tition witli Michael Angelo in the year 1503.' It was in- tended that paintings should be executed from them in the Palazzo Vecchio. Leonardo took for his subject the victory of the Florentines over Nicolo Picinnino, general of Filippo Maria Visconti, Duke of Milan, in 1440, at Anghiari in Tuscany ; INIichael Angelo, a scene from the Pisan campaigns. The former chose the last yet doubtful moment of victory ; the latter, that in which the battle is just beginning. AVhen these masterly and highly finished cartoons were exhibited, the young artists poured in from all sides to make them their study, and they appear to have exercised a decided influence on the full development of modern Art. Both cartoons have perished : Eubens copied from Leonardo's a group of four horsemen fighting for a standard ; this is engraved by Edelingk, and is just sufficient to make us bitterly deplore the loss of this rich and grand work. Among the works which Leonardo executed in Florence is an Adoration of the Kings, of a large size, in the gallery of the Uffizj. It can only be called a cartoon, since the light brown dead-colour intended to indicate the masses of shadow is all that is finished. It is, however, a rich and beautifully arranged composition, in which the general excitement caused ' [They were not done precisely at the same time ; Michael Angelo's was not completed and shown till 1506. See Passavant, Rafael von Urbino, i. 114.— Ed.] ST. ANNA AND THE VIEGIN, hy Leonardo da Vinci. pa^e 2*!. Chap. I. LEuXARDO DA VINCI AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 285 by the occasion is brouglit forward as the chief idea, in a new and masterly way. Some female portraits also belong to this time, one of which Vasari characteris;es as " divine," being that of Mona Lisa, wife of Giocondo, a friend of Leonardo's. This is in the Louvre — a picture of extraordinary loveliness; and of exquisite finish. The painter worked at it for four years, and pronounced it still unfinished. Even in its present utterly ruined condition there is something in this wonderful head of the ripest southern beauty, with its airy backgroimd of a rocky landscape, which exercises a peculiar fascination over the mind. The hands of the lady are of the purest form and grace. There are several copies of it in galleries — one, for instance, is at Munich. 'J'o this period is also as- signed a portrait of a celebrated old warrior in the Dresden Galleiy, Giangiacomo Trivulzi, field-marshal of Louis XII. of France ; but according to some authorities this is from the hand of the younger Holbein, and is supposed to represent a goldsmith of the name of INIorett. We sliall dwell further on this strange appearance of Holbein on tlie scene, which is not the only occasion on whicli we shall find him. The portrait of a beautiful woman witli a child, in the Pommersfelden Gallery, belongs also to this period. After Leonardo had for a series of years exercised his talents in Upper Italy, principally as an engineer, he pro- ceeded, in 1513, to Rome, where, however, he did not long remain. To this time a Madonna, painted on the wall of the upper corridor of the convent of S. Onofrio, is said to belong. It is on a gold ground : the action of the Madonna is beautiful, displaying the noblest form, and the expression of the countenance is peculiarly sweet ; but the Cliild, not- withstanding its graceful action, is somewhat hard and heavy, so as almost to warrant the conclusion that this picture be- longs to an earlier period, which would suppose a previous visit to Rome. One of Leonardo's most beautiful pictures is in Rome, in the Sciarra palace — two female half-figures of Modesty and Vanitv. The former, with a veil over her head, is a parti- cularly pleasing, noble profile, with a clear, open expression ; she beckons to her sister, who stands fronting the spectator, 286 . MASTERS OF TUE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. beautifully arrayed, and with a sweet seducing- smile. This picture is remarkably powerful in colourinif and wonderfully finished, but, unfortunately, has become rather dark in the shadows.' Another half-figxire of Vanity, with uncovered bosom and floweis in her hand, an extremely finished picture, formerly in the collection of the Prince of Orange at Brussels, now probably at the Hag-ue.* Another and very beautiful composition of Leonardo's, executed probably by Luini, representing Christ with the Doctors (also half-length figures), has migrated from the Palazzo Aldobrandini in Rome to the National Gallery in London. Christ is here represented as a youth of great beauty, serenity, and depth of expression ; the heads of the Doctors also are full of life and character. Many copies of this picture exist ; one of the finest is in the Spada palace at Rome. In 1516 Leonardo was invited to the court of Francis I. It is uncertain whether the following pictures, now in Paris, belong to this or to an earlier period : — for example, the charming portrait called La Belle Ferroniere, the reputed mistress of Francis I., but which, according to another opinion, is that of Lucrezia Crivelli : — the beautiful Holy Family, known by the name of La Vierge aux Rochers ; in this the Virgin kneels in a romantic rocky scene ; the infant Christ is before her, held by an angel ; the little St. John, whom she embraces, is adoring : this picture is of a simple, graceful character, but is unhappily much injured. The !>omew hat weak and hard composition is suflRcient, however, to show that this is not the original picture." Another Holy Family, in which the Archangel Michael is extending the scales to the Infant Saviour (la Vierge aux Balances), was probably executed by Marco d'Oggione. The so-called portrait of Charles VIII. is probably by Antonio BeltraflSo, and a sitting Bacchus in a landscape (originally, perhaps, St. John the Baptist) by ' Fumagalli (Scuola di Lionardo) ascribes this picture to Luini. Accord- ing to Rumohr, it was painted by Salai, in conjunction with his master. — Drei Reisen, p. 316. * Passavaut, Kunstreise, p. 393. 3 [Probably painted by some scholar from a design by Leonardo. Several repetitions exist. See Dr. Waagen, Kunstwerke in Paris, p. 426. — Ed.] Chap. I. LEONAKDO DA VIN^CI AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 287 some other scholar. Finally, a small Madonna with both the children can in no way be attributed to Leonardo, but is probably entirely by Perino del Vaga. A youthful Christ in tlie act of benediction, of the sweetest expression, is in the Borg'hese palace at Rome : it is a good Milanese school specimen. Leonardo died in the year 1519 — according to a story not well authenticated — in the arms of the king, who had come to visit the beloved artist in his last illness.' Before we proceed to speak of the scholars formed by Leo- nardo in the Milanese Academy, we must notice some artists who belong properly to a former period, but on whose later education he exercised a decided influence. One of these, Piero di Cosimo, a scholar of Cosiiuo Rosselli, was a rival of Leonardo in his early Florentine time. In Piero's pictures there is an evident desire to measure himself with his great contemporarj^ : he is occasionally successful in chiaroscuro, but is totally deficient in the nobleness of feeling so striking in Leonardo. His principal works are in Florence. An altar-picture, done for the church Agli Innocenti, is now in the small gallery of that institution ; another is in the gallery of the Uffizj. A Coronation of the Virgin also is in the Louvre. The artist is described as a man given up to gloomy fancies, and this character is impressed upon his works, especially in those small pictures in the Uftizj which represent the history of Perseus. His landscape backgrounds are generally very excellent. There is a good picture of his in the Berlin Museum, — a recumbent Venus playing with Love, a sleeping Mars in the background. The same fantastic character is here visible, but united with a soft and occasionally beautiful execution. ' [This story having been repeated since it was shown to be unfounded, it may be as well once more to give the grounds on which it has been doubted. Leonardo died at Cloux near Amboise, May 2, 1519. Accordins; to the journal of Francis L, preserved in the Royal Library at Paris, the Court was on that day at St. Gemiain en Laye. Francesco Jlelzi, in a letter written to Leonardo's relations immediately after his death, makes no men- tion of the circumstance in question. Lastly, Lomazzo, who communicated so much respecting the life of the great artist, distinctly says that the king first learned the death of Leonardo from Melzi. See Amoretti, Memorie, etc., Milan, 1804, and the notes to the last Florentine edition (1838) of Vasari. — Ed.] 288 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Lorenzo di Credi was a contemporary of Leonardo in the school of Andrea Verocchio, but followed less the manner of his master than that of his companion. He has copied some of Leonardo's pictures most successfully. His original sub- jects are generally limited to the narrow circle of tranquil Madonnas and Holy Families ; these he painted in a simple, graceful manner, with occasionally something of the style of Perugino. There are some excellent pictures by him in the galleiy of the Uffizj ; — for example, tuo beautiful round pic- tures of the Madonna adoring the Infant ; and more especially three others with smaller figures — the Madonna and St. John, Christ as a gardener with Mary Magdalen, and the Woman of Samaria at the Well ; — all expressive of the deepest feeling, with excellent colouring and exquisite execution. His prin- cipal work is a Nativity, in the Academy at Florence, of larger size, which unites in the happiest manner the style of Perugino with the freer feeling of the Florentines. In the Cathedral of Pistoja is a charming Madonna with two saints ; the background composed of architecture, flowers, and land- scape. Of all the foreign galleries the Berlin Museum possesses the best pictures by this master. Giovanni Antonio Sogliani was a scholar and successful imitator of Lorenzo. Some of his Madonnas, of a pleasing, mild character, are in the Florence Academy. An ex- cellent copy, by him, of Lorenzo's Nativity, is in the Berlin Museum. To these may be added a less distinguished artist, Giu- liano Bugiardini, who in most of his works appears in like manner as an imitator of Leonardo, but who only atlained a weak resemblance to his milder expressions. There are speci- mens of his works in the Gallery at Bologna and in the Berlin Museum. The distinguishing qualities of Leonardo were variously repeated by his scholars, according to their ow'n individual peculiarities. Although none attained to his eminence, a certain amiable and pure spirit, reflected from his noble mind, pervades the whole school. This spirit seems to liave pre- served his followers from falling into an unmeaning style, and a mere academic ostentation, which cliaracterize almost all Chap. I. LEOJfAKDO DA YIXCI AXD HIS FOLLOWERS. 289 the schools founded by the other great masters of the time. The principal works of Leonardo's scholars are collected in Milan, particularly in the gallery of the Brera ; among these the frescos taken from suppressed convents are the most interesting.' The most remarkable and the best known of his scholars are the following. Foremost among them stands Bernardino Luini (ordi Luvino, a village on the Lago Maggiore), a master whose excellence has been by no means sufficiently acknowledged. It is true he rarely rises to the greatness and freedom of Leonardo; but he has a never-failing tenderness and purity, a cheerfulness and sincerity, a grace and feeling, which give an elevated pleasure to the spectator in contemplating his pictures. That spell of beauty and nobleness which so exclusively characterizes the more important works of the Raphaelesque period has here impelled a painter of comparatively inferior talent to works which may often rank wdth the higliest which we know. The spirit of Leonardo, especially, was so largely imbibed by Luini, that his latest works are generally ascribed to Leonardo. This was the case for a long time with the enchanting half- length figure of the Infant Baptist plapng with the Lamb in the Ambrosian Gallery at Milan, and also flith the delicate picture of Herodias in the Tribune of the Uffizj at Florence. The same may be said of a still more remarkable and ex- tremely beautiful picture — the Madonna between S. Catherine and S. Barbara in the Esterhazy Gallery at Vienna. This still bears Leonardo's name. Excellent judges do not hesitate even to ascribe those compositions which have become so celebrated under Leonardo's name — the Christ disputing with the Doctors, and the pictures of Vanity and Modesty — to Luini, and that not only in the execution, but in the invention also. Otherwise the difference between his hand and that of the great master is seen in the immeasurable inferiority of his execution, especially in his modelling, and also in a greater universality of expression, which, compared with Leonardo's type, displays a close study of the Raphaelesque ideal. Luini's colouring is fresh, even in his frescos, while, on the other ' See Passavant, ' Beiträge zur Geschichte der alten Maler Schulen in der Lombardei,' in Kunstbl. 1838, No. 69 and further. O 290 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book Y. hand, he does not seem to have vinderstood the secret of har- monious composition. Milan is rich in the works of Luini — the Ambrosian library, the Brera, and the private collections possess treasures of graceful easel pictures. In the cathedral at Como, besides an excellent altar-piece, there are two dis- temper pictures on canvas — an Adoration of the Shepherds, and an Adoration of the Kings, with single figures of the most exquisite youtliful beauty. But Luini is seen to most advan- tage in his frescos, the greater part of which have accrued to the Brera Gallery from the walls of the suppressed churches of La Pace, and the convent della Pelucca — the fonner repre- senting events from the life of the Virgin, the latter classic subjects, handled in a more decorative manner, but full of nature. Still more excellent are liis frescos from Ovid's Metamorphoses, which are now preserved in the Casa Silva at Milan. In Luini's later works, on the other hand, a noble and mature strength developed itself; among these may be mentioned an excellent altarpiece, dated 1521, representing the Madonna enthroned, surrounded by saints ; it Avas taken from the church of the Brera, and placed in the Gallery. The immerous works in the jMonastero IMaggiore (S. Maurizio), the altar-wall in the inner church (\nth the exception of the old altarpicture), and a chapel, are painted by him. Here we liave the most beautiful figures of female saints, admirable heads of Christ, and lovely infant angels. From the dado, painted in brown chiaroscuro, to the roof, the walls are covered M'ith masterly frescos, and the spectator can scarcely gaze his fill in this lavish display of fancy. On the wall above the entrance to the choir is a large composition representing the Crucifixion, containing about 140 figures ; among which a group around the fainting figure of the Virgin, the fine form of the Centurion, those of the soldiers dividing the garments, and the Magdalen kneeling in ecstasy, are particularly re- markable. The painter, however, has attained the highest perfection in liis figure of St. John, whose action and expres- sion are full of the loftiest inspiration and faith. Single figures also of great beauty are still preserved upon the different piers and walls of the church. There is also a very graceful Madonna in a lunette over the door of the Refectory, Chap. I. LEONARDO DA \TXCI AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 291 and a Last Supper in the Refectory itself, much resembling Leonardo's, but not a copy of it (perhaps not even the work of Luini). The frescos executed by Luini in the church at Sarono, about the year 1530,' are not less distinguished ; these represent the history of the Virgin. Life is here painted in its most cheerful splendour, and yet with sincerest feeling ; the Adoration of the Kings is particularly rich in its invention, noble in style, and delicately conceived ; it is also the best preserved. Aurelio Luini, son of Bernardino, is considerably inferior to his father ; he is in general an unpleasing mannerist. His MartjTdom of St. Vincenzio, in the Brera, is a sufficient example — a large fresco, interesting only as the result of a successful experiment to transfer a fresco-painting to can- vas. Marco d' Oggione. — A clever painter in Leonardo's style, but wanting both the power of the master and the fascinating sweetness and deeper charm of Bernardino Luini ; a cold tone of colour prevails throughout his works. His frescos in the Brera, taken from S. Maria della Pace, are not very im- portant ; they generally want repose in composition, and are trivial in detail. Among his easel-pictures, on the contrary, some possess a beautiful, calm dignity, particularly the Three Archangels in the Brera, in which the drawing of the figures and bland expression of the countenances well deserve at- tention — a good Holy Family in the Louvre, and an altar- piece in S. Eufemia at Milan. His copies of Leonardo's Last Supper have been already mentioned. Andrea Salaino (Salai) resembles d'Oggione, with more freedom, more power and warmth of colouring. One of his principal works is in the Brera — a Madonna and Child, to whom St. Peter delivers the keys ; St. Paul stands behind. The picture is not important in composition, but is distinguished by its unconstrained action, after Leonardo's manner. His painting from Leonardo's cartoon of S. Anna deserves particu- lar commendation ; this also is in the Brera. Salaino's car- nations have usually a red, warm, transparent tone. ' With respect to the year, see Rumohr, Drei Reisen, etc., p. 309. o2 2ü2 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Giovan Antonio Beltraffio. — Gentleness is the characteristic of this artist ; his drawing, however, is somewhat timid and diy, thus indicating an affinity with the old Milanese school. His principal work is an altar-picture, painted for S. Maria della Misericordia at Bologna, and now in the Louvre — a Madonna and Child, between John the Baptist and St. Se- bastian, with the donors kneeling : the latter are very beautiful ; the St. Sebastian is simple and noble ; the Madonna, on the contrary, is rather constrained.' A S. Barbara, by the same artist, is in the Berlin Museimi, — a figure of peculiarly grand, statue-like dignity. Francesco Mclzi. — A noble Milanese (as was the artist last-mentioned) and a friend of Leonardo. His pictures are little known ; they are said to bear a strong resemblance to Leonardo's, and to be frequently mistaken for them. In the castle of Vaprio (one of the possessions of the Melzi) is a colossal fresco of a Madonna and Cliild, a very grand work, probably by him. A Pomona and Vertumnus, in the Berlin Museum, formerly ascribed to Leonardo, now bears the name of Fran- cesco. Vertumnus, in the form of an old woman, is rudely overpainted : the figure of Pomona, on the other hand, is well preserved, and is the finest specimen of a motive which re- peatedly occurs in tliis school. Cesare da Sesto. — A more important artist, who at a later period is found in the school of Raphael at Rome, and was on friendly terms with that master. His early works are pleasing, and resemble Leonardo's ; in his later we observe some of the peculiarities of the Roman school, which, however, do not combine quite happily with those of the Milanese. Among the former is a youthful Head of Christ, in the Ambrosian library at Milan, of very bland and unaffected expression, simply and beautifully painted ; also a beautiful Bajjtism of Christ, in the house of Duke Scotti at Milan, an excellent picture, ^vith a rich and very elaborate landscape. The latter is by the landscape-painter Bernazzano, who often painted in this manner with Cesare. In the Manfrini gallery at Venice ' During the time of the French usurpation this picture was in the central gallery at ^lilan. I am ignorant whether it remains there, or where it is at j)i eaent. Chap. I. LEOXARDO DA VIXCI AXD HIS FOLLOWERS. 203 are two Madonnas, and as they are painted in the two styles above alluded to, they afford interesting points of comparison. A large altarpiece, representing the Madonna with St. Roch and other saints, and displaying certain Raphaelesque ten- dencies, is in Duke Melzi's collection at Milan. Other pictui'es are in the Behedere palace at Vienna. One of the largest pictures of Cesare's later time, an Adoration of the Kings, with many figures, is in the Museo Borbonico at Naples. The Madonna and Child are in Leonardo's manner, the other figures in Raphael's ; but it is overladen in the composition, and displays that degenerate mannerism w^hich soon crept in among the scholars of Raphael. Gaudenzio Vinci of Novara. — An altar-picture at Arona near Milan, distinguished by nobleness of mien and truth of expression. It leans to the manner of Perugino and Francia.' Other school contemporaries, of whom little certain or re- markable is known, were Pietro Riccio (Gianpedrino?) — a St. Catherine between two wheels, in the Berlin Museum, is his ; Girolamo Alibrando of Messina ; Bernardino Fassalo of Pavia ; and finally, Bernardo Zenale, a scholar of the elder Vincenzio Civerchio, who later so devoted himself to Leo- nardo's manner, that a Madonna with Angels, now in the Brera, long passed for a work of the master's. Another Milanese of this time is Gaudenzio Ferrari, pro- perly speaking a Piedmontese from Valdugga* (1484-1549). This artist, strictly speaking, is not a scholar of Leonardo ; he appears to have proceeded from the old school of Milan, which maintained itself till the beginning of the sixteenth ' Schorn. ia the Tub. Kunstblatt, 1823, p. 2. There is a picture in the JIanfriui palace in Venice attributed to Perugino (formerly, it appears, to Luini) ; the date inscribed on it is 1500 : it is probably a work by Gaudenzio. It represents Christ Washing the Feet of his Disciples. The arrangement is solemn and beautiful ; the apostles are simply ranged next each other ; on the left, Peter sits at the basin, at the right ChJ-ist kneels, behind him John holds the napkin. The folds of the drapery are partly Peruginesque, partly in the manner of the old Venetian schools. In the heads the styles of the Umbrian and Venetian schools are mixed with that of Leonardo, or rather Luini ; one youthful head is painted quite in the graceful manner of the latter. On the school of Leonardo generally, see Passavant in the Tub. Kunstblatt, 1838, No. 69, etc. * See ' Le Opere del pittore e plasticatore Gaudenzio Ferrari, dis. ed inc. da Sylvestro Pianazzi, dir. e descr, da G. Bordiga,' Milano, 1835. 294 MASTEES OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. century. For some time also he studied in Perugino's atelier, but the influence of Leonardo is not to be mistaken. Like Cesare da Sesto, he worked at a later period under Raphael at Rome, and imbibed a great deal of the manner of that school. Together mth this union of different influences, he had a peculiarly fantastic style of his own. It distinguishes him from his contemporaries, and, although never quite free from mannerism, it was the source of characteristic beauties. Gaudenzio was one of the most prolific painters of his time, and has bequeathed a quantity of frescos to posterity, which, in point of freshness of colour, are scarcely inferior to those of Luini, and might be studied in various ways with benefit by the present fresco painters. His oil-paintings also are dis- tinguished for depth and clearness (not for harmony) of colour, also for intensity of expression, and for great animation and fulness of composition, although he is deficient in the nobler simplicity of the great masters. An early work of the highest merit, which shows the same afiinity to Leonardo which his countryman Razzi (of Vercelli) displays, is in the Royal Gallery at Turin ; it represents the group lamenting over the Dead Christ. An altarpiece in the new sacristy of the cathedral of Novara, a Martyrdom of St. Catherine in the Brera at Milan (a work of the most masterly freedom), a Visitation in the Solly collection, and a particularly beautiful Madonna with angels and saints, under an orange-tree, in the choir of S. Cristoforo in the cathedral at Vercelli, belong to his best easel pictures. On the other hand two pictures in distemper in the cathedral at Como, \A'ith all their power, are negligent and mannered. In the gallery of the Brera are several frescos by liim, principally taken from Santa Maria della Pace. Of these, three pictures representing the his- tory of Joachim and Anna (the parents of the Virgin)* are well worthy of notice. The side pictures contain the history of the couple after their separation. That on the left is peculiarly beautiful, where St. Anna is seen sitting, enduring the reproaches of her maid : both excellent and nobly drawn figures. The centre picture represents the consolation which ' [See the Flos Sanctorum. — Ed.] Chap. I. LEONARDO DA VIXCI AXD HIS FOLLOWERS. 295 is granted to them. A rich city (Jerusalem) is in the background ; a stream of water which flows on to the fore- ground divides the picture into two subjects. On the one side stands Anna, on the other Joachim with the shepherds, both looking up at the angels who announce their salvation. In the background, before the gates of the city, the couple meet and embrace. The grand freedom of the conception, com- bined with the dignity of the representation, makes this work particularly attractive. The frescos with which Gaudenzio decorated the celebrated Piedmontese place of pilgrimage, Varallo, are, however, his most comprehensive work. In the chapel of the Sacro IMonte he represented the Crucifixion in a large composition, the principal figures being in relief and coloured like nature. Behind tliis the walls are painted with a number of figures as spectators ; the women in the beautiful Luinesque manner, the warriors on horseback in fantastic knightly costume. Many figures, however, are somewhat extravagant and naturalistic. On the vaulted ceiling' are eighteen angels lamenting, some of them of the finest expression. In the convent of the INIinorites he painted, as early as 1507, a Presentation in the Temple, and a Christ among the Doctors ; and after 1510, the History of Christ in twenty-one pictures. These have all more or less affinity with Leonardo. The same may be said of a Madonna in six compartments, the so-called Ancona di S. Gaudenzio. His later works are more indicative of the school of Kaphael : for example, an Adoration in a lunette of S. Maria di Loreto, not far from Varallo, executed after 1527. The Refectory of S. Paolo at Vercelli contains a Last Supper, which, though so greatly inferior, shows the unavoidable influence of Leo- nardo. Assisted by his scholar Lanini (see further), Gau- denzio painted (1532-1535) the transept of the church of S. Cristoforo. The Birth, Annunciation, and Visitation of the Virgin, the Adoration of the Shepherds and of the Kings, the Crucifixion, and the Assumption of the Virgin, are by his own hand : all of these are pictures full of life and of the greatest decision of character, though here and there coarse and tinged -sWth mannerism. In the church of Saronno, not far from Milan, he decorated (1535) the cupola with a glory 296 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. of angels ; those below large and draped, those above naked winged boys, many of them of the highest beauty, after the style of Leonardo, others very mannered, with indications of Correggio's influence. Gaudenzio's last and larger work, a Scourging of Christ, in S. Maria delle Grazie at Milan (1542), exhibits peculiar power and freedom. FOLLOWERS OF GATJDENZIO FERRARI. Bernardino Lanini. — Not very important, nor free from a degenerate mannerism, but with some pleasing reminiscences of Leonardo's school. A Last Supper, at S. Nazaro Grande at Milan, is of this kind, and an altar-picture in the Berlin Museum. A Sposalizio, also, in S. Cristoforo at Vercelli, is by him (of more antiquated and Peruginesque conception) ; as are several much injured paintings of scenes from the life of Mary Magdalen, and also the wedding of an aristocratic and elderly pair, distinguished by great nature and animation. Besides these may be mentioned an excellent Madonna with saints, and another in S. Giuliano. Andrea Solario combined most gracefully Gaudenzio's mode of conception with Leonardo's expression and more refined feeling for form. A Madonna with the Child, in the Louvre, was, perhaps, executed after a drawing by Leonardo ; a daughter of Herodias is in the same collection. A beautiful and mild Christ, bearing his cross, is in the Berlin Museum ; an Assumption of the Virgin with saints in the new sacristy of the Certosa at Pavia ; a beautiful Madonna with the Child, liitherto called a Leonardo, in the gallery at Pommersfelden. Giovanni Battista Cerva. — Unimportant. His scholar, Giovanni Paolo Lomazzo, resembles Lanini. He has great merit as a writer on Art (' Trattato della Pit- tura,' 1584. ' Idea del Tempio della Pittura,' 1590). Ambrogio Figino, scholar of Lomazzo. — A weak and man- nered imitator of the early styles. Chap. II. MICHAEL AXGELO Ä^T> HIS FOLLOWEES. 297 CHAPTER II. MICHAEL ANGELO BUÖNAROTTI .\ND HIS FOLLOWERS. In the year 1474, twenty-two years later than Leonardo da Vinci, was born Michael Angelo Buonarotti.' Like Leonardo he led the way in accomplishing the perfection of modern Art, and shone as one of its brightest lights ; but Michael Angelo lived to witness its rapid decline, and died at a very advanced age in 1563. Like Leonardo, his talents were universal ; he was at once architect, sculptor, painter, and equally great in each art. He was an excellent poet* and musician, conversant in science, and a profound anatomist. To the study of anatomy alone he devoted twelve years, and produced results evincing the highest possible mastery. A proud, stern spirit gave its peculiar impress alike to the actions and works of Michael Angelo — a spirit which valued its own independence above all, and knew how to embody its profound thoughts in distinct creations without having recourse to the symbolic veil. His figures, if I may so speak, have a certain mysterious architectural grandeur ; they are the expression of primaeval strength, which stamps them, whether in motion or in rest, ^v-ith a character of highest energy, of intensest will. Michael Angelo began his career as an artist in the school of Domenico Ghirlandajo, but soon, influenced by inclination and external circumstances, he turned to the study and practice of sculpture. His first important work in the department of ' Giorgio Vasari, Vita del gran Michelagnolo Buonarotti, Firenze, 1568 (a separate impression of the Life of M. Angelo in Vasari's great work) ; Later edition, Roma, 1760 (aggiuntevi copiose note). — Ascanio Condivi : Vita di Michel Angelo Buonarroti, Roma, 1.553 ; Seconda edizione acoresciuta, Firenze, 1746 ; New edition, Pisa, 1823. — Quatremere de Qirincy : Hist, de Michel-Angel. Buonarotti, Paris, 1835. — Compare : Beschreibung der h^tadt Rom. bd. ii. abth. 2, p. 254, fF. etc. — Outlines in Landon : Vies et (Euvres, etc. t. Michel Ange Buonarotti. — Catalogue of engravings after Micliael Angelo, in the Nachrichten von Kunstlern und Kimstsachen, Leipzig, 1768, band i. p. 355, &c. [Duppa, the Life of Michel Angelo Buonarroti, with his Poetry and Letters, London, 1807. — Ed.] * [The spirit of Michael Angelo's poetry has been lately rendered accessible to the English reader in a translation of select specimens, accompanied by an enlightened introductorv di.ssertation, by Mr. John Edward Taylor. — Ed.] o 3 298 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. painting, the cartoon already mentioned, which he executed in emulation of the more practised Leonardo da Vinci, appeared when he had only just attained to manhood (1504). For the history of this competition we refer the reader to our last chapter. Michael Angelo's cartoon is also lost (it is said to have been destroyed by Baccio Bandinelli, one of his rivals), but the greater part of the composition is known to us by some old engravings and copies.' Michael Angelo chose for his subject the commencement of the battle, and, as appears from the existing copies, the moment when a crowd of Florentine soldiers, bathing in the Arno, unexpectedly hear the summons to conflict. This choice enabled the artist to display in full and lively development his knowledge of the human form. All is in movement : the warriors, some already clothed, some half or wholly naked, crowd hastily together ; some clamber up the steep shore from the river, others press their naked limbs into their tight clothing, others again fully armed hasten to join the combat. In the opinion of his contemporaries,* Michael Angelo never again created a work so perfect, but this opinion appears to refer principally to the execution. These cartoons, as already observed, had a considerable in- fluence on the progress of the younger contemporaries of the two great masters. In the next succeeding years Michael Angelo was again employed on a great work in sculpture,* having been invited to Rome by Pope Julius II., and entrusted with the execution of a splendid monument, of which, however, only a small portion was ultimately finished. The Pope himself was the principal cause of the interruption, for independently of fre- quent misunderstandings on the subject of the monument which had arisen between him and the artist, he had con- 1 Single figiu-es and groups of the cai-toon, some known by the title of " The Climbers" (Les Grimpeurs), exist in ditFerent engravings by Marc- Antonio and Agostino da Venezia. An old copy of the principal part of the composition, painted in oil in chiaroscuro, is at Holkham, in the possession of the Earl of Leicester. — See Passavant, Kunstreise, etc., p. 194. Engraved by Schiavonetti : Reveil, 541. 2 See particularly, Vita di Benvenuto Cellini, i. 2. 3 [Michael Angelo's principal works in sculpture, prior to the period in question, were the David and the group of the Pieta; by no means such extensive undertakings as the proposed monument. — Ed.J L^- W Chap. IL MICHAEL AXGELO A^D HIS FOLLOWERS, 299 ceived the idea of emplojang him to paint in fresco the ceiling of the Sistine chapel, which had hitherto remained unadorned.^ Michael Angelo at first wished to decline this commission, which would necessarily interrupt the work already in pro- gress, and probably did not feel himself quite equal to the execution of a work in fresco. As the Pope, however, ear- nestly insisted, he began this immense undertaking in 1508, and completed it, without assistance, in the space of three years.* In the commencement he had sent for some former fellow-scholars and friends from Florence to execute some of the paintings from his cartoons, perhaps also to learn from them tlie practice of fresco painting, in which he had had little experience. Their work, however, proved unsatisfactory : he sent them home again, obliterated what they Iiad begun, and finished the work alone. The ceiling of the Sistine chapel contains the most perfect works done by Michael Angelo in his long and active life. Here his great spirit appears in its noblest dignity, in its highest purity ; here the attention is not disturbed by that arbitrary display to which his great power not unfrequently seduced him in other works. The ceiling forms a flattened arch in its section ; the central portion, which is a plane surface, contains a series of large and small pictures, repre- senting the most important events recorded in the book of Genesis — the Creation and Fall of Man, with its immediate consequences. In the large triangular compartments at the springing of the vault are sitting figures of the prophets and sibyls as the foretellers of the coming of the Saviour.^ In the • Vasari relates that Pope Julius II. wished to have the works of the earlier masters destroyed, but adds that Michael Augelo suffered tlieiu to remain from a desire to show the improvement that had taken place ia the Art since they were done. Among the great artist's reasons, we may fairly include his respect for the feeliiigs of the artists, several of whom were still living. He may also have been influenced (see a subsequent note) by the nature of the subjects, which, in their general order and import, were capable of being combined with the plan he contemplated. — Ed.] '^ According to concurrent testimony, M. Angelo was employed but twenty- two months on these paintings ; but it is impossible that the execution of the cartoons can be included in this short period ; hence the above assumption. 3 The Sibyls, according to the legends of the middle ages, stand next in dignity to the Prophets of the Old Testament. It was their office to foretel the coming of the Saviour to the heathen, as it was that of the Prophets to announce him to the Jews. [The 300 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. soffits of the recesses between these compartments, and in the arches underneath, immediately above the windows, are the ancestors of the Vrr^n, the series leading the mind directly to the Sariour. The external connexion of these numerous representations is formed by an architectural framework of peculiar composition which encloses the single subjects, tends to make the principal masses conspicuous, and gives to the whole an appearance ofthat solidity and support so necessary, but so seldom attended to in soffit decorations, which may be considered as if suspended. A great number of figures are also connected with the framework ; those in unimportant situations are executed in the colour of stone or bronze ; in the more important, in natural colours. They serve to support the architectural forms, to fill up and to connect the whole. They may be best described as the living and embodied genii of architecture. It required the united power of an architect, sculptor, and painter to conceive a structural whole of so much grandeur, to design the decorative figures with the sig- nificant repose required by their sculpturesque character, and yet to preserve their subordination to the principal subjects, and to keep the latter in the proportions and relations best adapted to the space to be filled. Many artists at a later period have made the like attempt, particularly Annibal Ca- racci, in the Farne^^e palace, but none have seized and carried out the idea of the whole with the same natural and consistent connexion. [The Sibyls are alluded to "by Greek, R«man, and Jewish writers, and by most of the Christian fathers. The latter, on the authority of Van-o, enu- merate ten of these prophetesses. (See Lactantius, De Falsa Religione, i. 6.) The authority of the Sibylline writings with the pagans soon suggested the pious fraud of intei-polating them; the direct allusions to the Messiah which they contain are supposed to have been inserted in the second century. (See Blondel, Des Sibylles Celebres.) But notwithstanding the occasional expres- sion of some suspicion as to their authenticity, these spurious predictions continued to be held in veneration not only during the middle ages, but even to a comparatively modem date, and the Sibyls were represented in con- nexion with Scripture subjects before and after Michael Angelo's time by various painters. The circumstance of their appearing in works of art as equal in rank with the Prophets may have arisen from the manner in which St. Augustine (De Civit. Dei, xviii. 47) speaks of the Erythi-aean Sibyl's testimony, immediately before he advei-ts to that of the Prophets of the Old Testament. The fullest of the numerous dissertations on the Sibyls is, per- haps, that of Clasen (De Oraculis Gentilium, Helmstad. 1673). — Ed.] Chap. n. MICHAEL AXGELO AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 301 The scenes from Genesis in the flat space of the roof are the most sublime representations of these subjects ; — the Creating Spirit is unveiled before us. The peculiar type which the painter has here given of the form of the Almighty Father has been frequently imitated by his followers, and even by Raphael, but has been surpassed by none. Michael Angelo has represented him in majestic flight, sweeping through the air, surrounded by genii, partly supporting, partly borne along -ndth him, covered by his floating drapery ; they are the distinct syllables, the separate virtues of his creating word. — In the first [large] compartment we see him with extended hands assigning to the sun and moon their respective paths. — In the second, he awakens the first man to life. Adam lies stretched on the verge of the earth in the act of raising him- self; the Creator touches him with the point of his finger, and appears thus to endow him with feeling and life. This picture displays a wonderful depth of thought in the composi- tion, and the utmost elevation and majesty in the general treatment and execution. — The third subject is not less im- portant, representing the Fall of Man and his Expulsion from Paradise. The tree of knowledge stands in the middle, the serpent (the upper part of the body being that of a woman) ' is twined round the stem ; she bends down toward the guilty pair, who are in the act of plucking the forbidden fruit. The figures are nobly graceful, particularly that of Eve. Close to the serpent hovers the angel with the sword, ready to drive the fallen beings out of Paradise. In this double action, this union of two separate moments, there is something peculiarly ' [Michael Angelo's feeling for beauty led him to combine the human and serpentine forms more agreeably than preceding painters had contrived this. His Tempter somewhat resembles the chissic ocean deities, or, more literally, Hesiod's Echidna : but the serpent with a female head occurs in much earlier representations of the Fall ; among others, in that by Pietro d'Orvieto in the Campu Santo at Pisa, and still earlier in illuminated MSS. In the woodcuts imitated from these in the printed copies of the Speculum Salvationis and other compendiums of the kind, the serpent is sometimes winged, and the female head is adorned with a crown. The first chapter of the work just named contains the following passage : — '' Quoddam ergo genus serpentis sibi dyabolus eligebat, qui cum ereotus gradiebatur et oqjut virgineum habebat." This fable is giveu nearly in the same words by Comestor (Historia Scholas- tica), a writer of the twelfth century, with the addition, " ut ait Beda," so that it is at least as old as the eighth. — Ed.J 302 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTUKY. Book V. poetic and significant : it is guilt and punishment in one picture. The sudden and lightning-like appearance of the avenging angel behind the demon of darkness has a most impressive effect. — The fourth, a representation of the Deluge, with many figxu-es, is one of the most extensive dramatic com- positions of Michael Angelo. The four small intermediate compartments, representing the Almighty separating Light from Darkness, the Creation of Eve, the Thanksgiving of Noah, and the Inebriation of Noah, all display great and peculiar beauties.' The prophets and sibyls in the triangular compartment of the curved portion of the ceiling are the largest figures in the whole work ; these, too, are among the most wonderful forms that modern art has called into life. They are all represented seated, employed wdth books or rolled manuscripts ; genii stand near or behind them. These mighty beings sit before us pensive, meditative, inquiring, or looking upwards with inspired countenances. Their fonns and movements, indicated by the grand lines and masses of tlie drapery, are majestic and dignified. We see in them beings who, while they feel and bear the sorrows of a corrupt and sinful world, ' [There are five smaller subjects (see the accompanying engraving) ; the one omitted by the author is the Gathering of the Waters (Gen. i. 9). Al- though these compartments are relatively small, some of them contain figures larger than life : on the other hand, in one of the large subjects — the Deluge — the figures are so small, owing to their number, that the composition can scarcely be distinguished from below (and must always have been indistinct, making every allowance for the injuries of time). The same may be said of the two subjects next it, the Sacrifice of Koah, and the same patriarch deiided by Flam. These three subjects are the last in order at that end of the flat portion of the ceiling which is next the door ; the figures toward the other end are colossal. This diflerence might be partly accounted for by supposing the subjects with small figures to have been the first done, when the painter, finding that they produced no effect from below, changed the dimensions as we see to satisfy the eye. That Michael Angelo really began at this end of the ceiling appears from an incidental statement of Condivi relating to the disgust which the great artist felt from a temporaiy alteration of the colours (and partly, perhaps, fi-om the defect to which we allude). The biographer says, " having commenced the undertaking and completed the painting of the Deluge, the surface of the fresco began to exhibit a mouldy efflorescence, " etc. It is true it would have been difficult to represent such a subject as the Deluge with very few figures, and the greatest number in the compositions of larger treatment is six (the double subject of the Fall and Expulsion from Paradise has no more), but any liberty of this kind would have been prefer- able to the indistinctness resulting from diminutive size. — Ed,] Chap. n. MICHAEL ANGELO A:s^D HIS FOLLO^^"ERS. 303 have power to look for consolation into the secrets of the future. Yet the greatest variety prevails in the attitudes and expression — each figure is full of individuality. Zacharias is an aged man, busied in calm and circumspect investigation ; •Jeremiah is bowed down absorbed in thought — the thought of deep and bitter grief; Ezekiel turns ^vith hasty movement to the genius next to him, who points upwards with joyful expec- tation, &c. The sibyls are equally characteristic : the Persian — a lofty, majestic woman, very aged ; the Erythraean — full of power, like the warrior goddess of wisdom ; the Delphic — like Cassandra, youthfully soft and graceful, but with strength to bear the awful seriousness of revelation, &c. The Genealogy of the Holy Virgin* is represented in the most varied family groups, which, without delineating par- ticular events (of which, indeed, few are mentioned in the Scriptures), express domestic union and a tranquil expecta- tion and hope in the future. To these simple circumstances the artist has given the most varied motives, and has pro- duced from them a series of groups, which please by a pecu- liar air of seclusion and a dignified and beautiful conception of domestic life. These groups and figures belong again to Michael Angelo's noblest compositions ; they display a depth of feeling and tenderness, which, though still bearing the impress of his elevated mind, is rarely found in his works, and oflfer interesting points of comparison with the Holy Families of Raphael. Four historical subjects in the corner sofl^its of the ceiling are still to be mentioned ; they represent instances of the deliverance of the people of Israel : ^ — Judith, after she has slain Holofernes ; Goliath vanquished by David ; the Miracle of the Brazen Serpent ; and the Punishment of Haman. In these works also the great genius of the artist manifests itself: the figure of Haman on the Cross has always been celebrated as a master-work of diflficult foreshortening. ' [Some Biblical commentators have explained the difierence between the genealogies recorded by St. Matthew and St. Luke, by supposing that the latter gives the descent of the Virgin ; but even this view (which is not that of the church of Rome) is inapplicable here, since Michael Angelo has given the descent of Joseph as it appears in St. Matthew, the names being inscribed near the figures. — Ed.] * [See a note on these four subjects at the end of the chapter. — Ed.] 304 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. After these paintings the artist was occupied chiefly with statues and architectural works, of which the principal were the new sacristy of S. Lorenzo at Florence, and the monu- ments of the Medici family, which are placed there. In his sixtieth year he was invited to undertake his second great work in painting, the Last Judgment, on the end wall of the Sistine chapel, sixty feet high. He began it at the desire of Clement VII., and finished it within seven years, in the pon- tificate of Paul III., in the year 1541. If we consider the countless number of figures, the boldness of the conception, the variety of movement and attitude, the masterly drawing, particularly the extraordinary and difficult foreshortenings, this immense work certainly stands alone in the history of art, but in purity and majesty it does not equal the paintings on the ceiling. In the upper half of the picture we see the Judge of the world, surrounded by the apostles and patriarchs : beyond these, on one side, are the martyrs ; on the other, the saints, and a numerous host of the blessed. Above, under the two arches of the vault, two groups of angels bear the instruments of the passion. Below the Saviour another group of angels holding the books of life sound the trumpets to awaken the dead. On the right is represented the resur- rection ; and higher, the ascension of the blessed. On the left, hell, and the fall of the condemned, who audaciously strive to press upwards to heaven. The day of wrath ("dies irae") is before us — the day, of which the old liymn says — Quantiis tremor est futurus, Quando judex est venturus Cuncta sti'icte discussurus. The Judge turns in wrath toward the condemned and raises his right hand, with an expression of rejection and condemnation ; beside him tlie Virgin veils herself with her drapery, and turns, with a countenance full of anguish, toward the blessed.' The martyrs, on the left, hold up the instru- 1 The motive of both figures is bonowed, as already remarked (p. 148), from the old fresco by Orcagna, in the Campo Santo at Pisa. Chap. n. MICHAEL ANGELO AKD HIS FOLLOWERS. 305 ments and proofs of their martyrdom, in accu.sation of those who had occasioned their temporal death : these the aveiigi no- angels drive from the gates of heaven, and fulfil the sentence pronounced against them. Trembling and anxious the dead rise slowly, as if still fettered by the weight of an earthly nature ; the pardoned ascend to the blessed ; a mysterious horror pervades even their hosts — no joy nor peace, nor blessedness are to be found here. It must be admitted that the artist has laid a stress on this view of his subject, and this has produced an unfavourable effect upon the upper half of the picture. We look in vain for the glory of heaven, for beings who bear the stamp of divine holiness, and renunciation of human weakness ; every- where we meet with the expression of human passion, of human efforts. We see no choir of solemn tranquil forms, no harmonious unity of clear grand lines, produced by ideal draperies ; instead of these, we find a confused crowd of the most varied movements, naked bodies in violent attitudes, un- accompanied by any of the characteristics made sacred by a holy tradition. Christ, the principal figure of the whole, Avants every attribute but that of the Judge : no expression of divine majesty reminds us that it is the Saviour who exer- cises this office. The upper half of the composition is in many parts heavy, notmtlistanding the masterly boldness of the drawing ; confused, in spite of the separation of the prin- cipal and accessory groups ; capricious, notwithstanding a grand arrangement of the whole. But, granting for a moment that these defects exist, still this upper portion, as a whole, has a very impressive effect, and, at the great distance from which it is seen, some of the defects alluded to are less offensive to the eye. The lower iialf deserves the highest praise. In these groups, from the languid resuscitation and upraising of the pardoned, to the despair of the condemned, every variety of expression, anxiety, anguish, rage, and despair, is powerfully delineated. In the convulsive struggles of the condemned \vith the evil demons, the most passionate energy displays itself, and the extraordinary skill of the artist here finds its most appropriate exercise. A peculiar tragic grandeur pervades alike the beings who are given up to despair and 306 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. their hellish tormentors. Tliis representation of all that is fearful, far from being repulsive, is thus invested with that true moral dig-nity which is so essential a condition in the higher aims of art. The nudity of almost all the figures gave offence even during the life of the artist. Pope Paul IV"., \\ho cared little for art, wished to have the painting destroyed ; but it was afterwards arranged that Daniele da Volterra, one of Michael Angelo's scholars, should cover some of the most objectionable figures with drapery, which fixed upon him the nickname of " 11 Bragliettone." At a later period the effect of the picture was again injured by a repetition of the same affectation. A very excellent copy, of small dimensions (seven and a half feet high), executed under the direction of Michael Angelo, by Marcello Venusti, is in the Museo Borbonico at Kaples.' Two excellent frescos, executed by Michael Angelo on the side walls of the Pauline chapel, in the Vatican, belong to the same period. They are little cared for, and are so much blackened by the smoke of lamps that they are seldom men- tioned. The Crucifixion of St. Peter, under the large window, is in a most unfavourable light, but is distinguished for its grand, severe composition. That on the opposite wall — the Conversion of St. Paul — is still tolerably distinct. The long train of his soldiers is seen ascending in the background. Christ, surrovmded by a host of angels, bursts upon his sight from the storm-flash. Paul lies stretched on the ground — a noble and finely developed form. His followers fly on all sides or are struck motionless by the thunder. The arrange- ment of the groups is excellent, and some of the single figures are very dignified ; the composition has, moreover, a principle of order and repose, which, in comparison with the Last Judgment, places tliis picture in a very favourable light. If there are any traces of old age to be found in these works, they are at most discoverable in the execution of details. The pictures ascribed to Michael Angelo in different gal- ' [On the general arrangement and connexion of the subjects in the Cap- pella Sistina, see the note at the end of this chapter. — Ed.] THE CONVEBSION OF ST. PAUL; A fresco by Michael Augelo, in the Cappella Faolina. pa*e 306. THE HOLY FAMILY ; a tempei3 pamtmg by Micliael Angelo, in the Tribune at Florence. pa^e 307. Chap. IL MICHAEL Al^GELO AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 307 leries are seldom genuine ; he very rarely exercised his hand in easel-pictures, and probably never painted in oil. In the tribune of the UfRzj, at Florence, is a round picture of a Holy Family, in distemper, vrhich is perhaps his only strictly authenticated easel-picture,' and belongs to his early time. He always dealt in the most difficult positions and motives : here the kneeling Virgin is lifting the child from the lap of Joseph, who is seated behind her ; in the background are five naked male figures. The whole makes by no means an at- tractive picture, and the colouring is mannered. In the Pitti Gallery at Florence a picture of the Three Fates is ascribed to him — severe, keen, characteristic figures : it was executed, however, by Rosso Fiorentino. A Leda, also, in distemper, appears to have been lost ; * an old copy of this grand compo- sition, in the royal palace at Berlin, has been often quoted as the original. Although Michael Angelo showed little inclination for easel-pictures himself, he allowed his scholars and other artists to copy from his drawings and cartoons. In this way many of his compositions have been spread abroad ; the grand ma- jestic spirit of the master gives them their character, but their individual value obviously depends on the greater or less ability of the painters employed. One of the best known and most beautiful of these compositions is a Holy Family , \\-here the child sleeps on the lap of the Virgin, with his arm hanging down ; on one side is the little St. John clothed in a panther's skin ; on the other, Joseph looks on in silence. The various copies of this picture are distinguished by trifling variations ; one of the best was, a few years ago, in the possession of Messrs. Woodburn of London ; ^ another is in the Corsini Gallery at Rome. A Christ at the Well, with the Samaritan woman, executed by one of his best scholars, is in the Liver- pool Institution. An Annunciation, also, painted by Mar- ' Vasari, Vita di Michelagno. * [The cartoon is in England. — Ed.] 3 [This picture, by Marcello Venusti, is still in their possession ; the ori- ginal drawing by Michael Angelo has lately passed from their hands to the collection of the King of Holland. The same royal amateur obtained from them Michael Angelo's drawing of the Expulsion of the Money-changers. M. Venusti's painting from this still belongs to Messrs. Woodbui-n. — Ed.J 308 MASTERS OF TUE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. cello Venusti, is in the Sacristy of the Lateran at Rome. Michael Angelo's so-called " Dream" is multiplied in several repetitions. The best, probably by Sebastian del Piombo, is in the National Gallery at London. A naked male figure is leaning upon a stone bench, the recess of which is covered with bas-relief masks, as symbols of the deceptiveness of life. He is supporting himself also upon a globe, and looks I'estlessly upwards. Pictures and scenes of various earthly passions sur- round him in cloudy forms, while behind him a genius with the sound of a mighty trumpet is rousing him to consciousness. A Pieta of Michael Angelo's designing is also very grand. The Dead Christ is in the lap of the Virgin, the arms sup- ported by two cherubs. A small copy of this is in the Mmiich Gallery. A Clu-ist on the Mount of Olives occurs frequently (in Berlin, Vienna, Munich, Rome, in the Doria Gallery, etc.) : the original drawing is in the gallery of the Uffizj at Florence. Two moments are represented : on the one side, Christ is at prayer ; on the other, he awakens the sleeping disciples. An Annunciation, in the gallery of the Duke of "Wellington, is a very grand, solemn, and dignified composi- tion ; the original drawing of this also is in the Uffizj at Florence. The Crucifixion is a very frequent subject : an excellent copy by Sebastian del Piombo is in the Museum at Berlin. Sebastian del Piombo's chef-d'ceuvre, the Raising of Lazarus, in the National Gallery at London, contains not only single figures by Michael Angelo, but is indebted to him probably for the original design. The same grand feeling which reigns in Michael Angelo's religious subjects pervades his representations from the ancient mythology — representations in which the pleasures of sense form the subject. The Leda, already mentioned, is a fine example of the dignity and purity of his conceptions in subjects of this kind. A Venus kissed by Love is also a picture of wonderful freedom, power, and life. A masterly copy of this composition, by Pontormo, is in the royal palace of Ken- sington, near London ; another, probably also by Pontormo, is in the Berlin Museum. The original cartoon, and a less satisfactory copy by one of Michael Angelo's scholars, are in the Museum at Naples. To this class belongs also a Gany- DESCENT FBC'Ii TEE CEOSS: by Damfele da Vcla=rra. p&te 309, Chap. II. MICHAEL AXGELO .VXD HIS FOLLOWERS. 309 mecle, borne through the air by the Eagle ; of this there are man)' coi)ies : an excellent one is in the gallerj^ of the royal palace at Berlin ; another is at Kensington. The work which occupied the last ten years of this great artist's life was the building of St. Peter's. Persevering with iron energy, without any i-emuneration, for the honour of God only, he had nearly brought this undertaking to its comple- tion, according to his own plan, while every previous attempt had miscarried. It must be admitted that this work is not entirely free from the effects of a capricious taste ; but the disposition of the whole is so singularly grand, that had not the general effect of the building been injured by later addi- tions, it would have ranked among the most sublime works of modern architecture. Among the scholars of Michael Angelo we will for the present mention only those who either immediately carried out his designs, or were capable of inventing great works in his style. The foremost of these is Marcello Venusti, who executed many works from the master's drawings, and is dis- tinguished by a delicate and neat execution. In the Colonna Gallery at Rome there is a picture by him — Christ appearing to the Souls in Hades — of noble and excellent motives in detail, but too scattered and feeble in composition. Michael Angelo willingly employed the Venetian Fra Sebastiano del Piombo, in a similar way ; by this means he united his own admirable drawing with the beautiful colouring of the Vene- tian .school, and thus hoped to establish a counterpoise to the school of Raphael, to which in many respects he stood opposed. For the account of one of the most important works of this kind see a future chapter. The- best and most independent scholar of Michael Angelo is Daniele Ricciarelli, named Da- niele da Volterra (a former scholar of Razzi's and Peruzzi's), an artist who imbibed the peculiarities of his master, though he by no means reached his sublimity.* His best work, a Descent from the Cross, in the Trinita de' Monti, at Rome, is copious in composition, and altogether a grand, impassioned work, full of powerful action. An excellently composed but some- ' Outlines iii Laudon : Vies et (Euvres, etc., t. Daniele Ricciarelli. 310 MASTERS OP THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. what inexpressive Baptism of Christ is in S. Pietro in Montorio, at Rome. A double picture in the Louvre, representing David and Goliath, in two different points of view, on each side of a tablet of slate, is violent and hard, but of such masterly power of representation as to have long gone by Miciiael Angelo's name. A very celebrated picture, the Massacre of the Innocents, by him, is in the tribune of the Uffizj at Florence ; it contains more than seventy figures, but it is cold and artificial. Daniele is said also to have under- taken some of the paintings on the external walls of the Roman palaces — a mode of decoration which in his time was much in fashion. Some subjects from the history of Judith, painted in grey chiaroscuro, which still embellish the facade of the Massimi palace, are ascribed to him ; they are clever works, but deficient in true inward energy. NOTE ON THE SUBJECTS OF THE PAINTINGS IN THE CAPPELLA SISTINA, The paintings of the Sistine Chapel have been often described, particularly with reference to their style : a few observations are here added on the con- nexion of the subjects. In the general plan Michael Angelo appears to have followed the ordinary series of Biblical types and antityjies familiar in his time, and indeed for centuries previously, by means of illuminated compen- diums of the Old and New Testament. The spirit of these cycles of Scripture subjects was the same fi-om first to last : an ulterior meaning was always contemplated : everything was typical. This was in accordance with the system of interpretation introduced by the earliest fathers of the church, con- firmed and followed up by its fom- great doctors, and carried to absurd excess by some theologians of the middle ages. At first the incidents of the Old Testament were referred, as we have seen, only to the Redeemer; but in later times the Madonna was also typified in the heroines of the Jewish his- tory. The cycles of subjects referring to both are by some supposed to have existed in MS. illuminations so early as the ninth century (see Heinecken, Idee d'une Collection complete d'Estampes, p. 319). The decoration of the Cappella Sistina was begim by various masters (see p. 200 and note), under Sixtus IV., about 1474. How far the original plan was to have extended, and what its general arrangement would have been, it is useless to inquire ; but certainly the additions made at various times by Michael Angelo, and first begun in 1508, however different in style, were contrived by him to correspond sufficiently well in general sequence witli the earlier works. A similar connexion seems to have been intended Chap. II. MICHAEL ANGELO AND HIS FOLLOWERS. 311 by Rapliael, in decorating the remaining portion of the walls of the chapel, under these frescos, with the tapestries from the cartoons, the subjects of which, taken from the Acts of the Apostles, thus still followed in chronolo- gical order (see a subsequent note). We proceed briefly to describe the general arrangement of the series treated or contemplated by his great rival. On the wall over and on each side of the entrance-door Michael Angelo had intended to paint the Fall of Lucifer, so as to correspond with the Last Judgment on the altar-wall opposite. The sketches and studies which he had prepared for this work were afterwards employed and badly copied in fresco by one of his assistants, in the church of the Trinitä de' Monti at Rome (Vasari, Vita di M. Angelo). This fresco has long ceased to exist ; some of the drawings may, however, yet come to light.' The subject in question, although it would have been the last done, would have fomied the beginning of the cycle : then follow the subjects of the Creation, the Fall of Man, etc., on the ceiling ; the Prophets and Sibyls, the Genealogy of the Redeemer, and four types fi-om Jewish history (see the next note). One of these — perhaps it may be considered the last of the series as to place ^ — representing Moses and the Brazen Serpent, may have been intended as the immediate connecting link between the subjects on the ceiling and the his- tories of Moses and Christ, by the older masters, below. Underneath these last again were the tapestries from Raphael's cartoons. These decorations, though moveable, were always an-anged in the same order. The central subjects in the lower part of the altar-wall were originally the Assumption and Coronation of the Virgin ; the first a fresco by Perugino ; the latter, under it, a tapestry from one of Raphael's cartoons, now lost.^ Both, together with other works, were afterwards cancelled or removed to make room for Michael Angelo's Last Judgment. Perino del Vaga ultimately made some fresh designs for tapestries to fill the naiTow space which remained underneath that fresco, but these latter were never executed. If we now compare this cycle with those fi-equently occurring in illumi- nated MSS., Italian and Transalpine, we shall find that the order of the sub- jects generally corresponds. It need not be objected that the designs in these MSS. (which, however, must not be judged by the very inferior inventions and copies in the first attempts at wood-engraving) were unworthy the atten- tion of a great artist ; it is merely intended to show that the same series of Scriptural types, which appears to have been at least tacitly authorized by the Church in the middle ages, was adopted by Michael Angelo. The series here more particularly alluded to is known by the name of the " Speculum Humanas Salvatiom's," a title quite applicable to the general scheme of the Sistine Chapel. MS. copies of the work exist in the British Museum, in the Royal Library at Paris, and elsewhere. In this compendium the first subject ' It is possible that some may be in the hands of collectors, but may be erroneously considered to belong to the Last Judgment. 2 Vasari calls the Jonah which precedes it the last of the single figures. * See the Editor's note, p. 200, and a subsequent note on the original situation of the tapestries. 312 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTUKY. Book V. is the Fall of Lucifer ; then follow the Creation of Eve, the Disobedience of Man, the Deluge, etc. : in connexion with the Nativity of the Virgin we find the Genealogical " Stem of Jesse ;" and in connexion with the Birth of Christ the Sibyl shows Augustus the vision of the Virgin and Child ; Esther and Judith appear as types of the Madonna; and David Slaying Goliath pre- figures Christ's Victoiy over Satan in the Temptation.' In some of the printed editions the subject of Jonah immediately precedes the Last Judg- ment ; the same connexion is observed in the altar-wall of the Cappella Sis- tina ; and, although there was an interval of many years between the com- pletion of the two frescos, this seems to prove that the entire series was always contemplated. In MS. Gospels, and some editions of the Biblia Pauperum, the subjects of the New Testament are surmounted or surrounded by busts of the Prophets. While remarking these coincidences, we may observe that the story of Heliodorus, so finely treated by Raphael and alluded to by Dante (Purg. c. 20), occurs in the Speculum Salvationis in connexion with Christ's Entiy into Jerusalem (the Expulsion of the Money-changers). In considering the whole cycle of the Cappella Sistina, it will be seen that the Bible subjects by Michael Angelo are more abundant than the antitypes by the older masters, who had occupied one wall with incidents from the life of Moses ; but it would have been impossible to destroy these latter without also removing the opposite series from the New Testament, and this would have involved the necessity of repainting the whole, a labour which Michael Angelo, anxious to complete his undertakings in sculpture, probably wished to avoid. If, however, we assume the possibility of his ever having contem- plated the repainting of this lower series, in accordance with the wishes of Julius IL, we may then conclude that some of his designs for New Testament subjects (of which a few were copied in a small size by Marcello Venusti and others) may have been intended for this purpose. Even as it is, perhaps no earlier painter followed the order indicated in the cycles that have been quoted more implicitly than Michael Angelo. The reason of this may have been that on other occasions a reference to particular dogmas of the church, and even to the liistory of particular saints, may have been demanded ; but in the sanctuary of the Christian hierarchy the most appropriate subjects were obviously such as had reference to the scheme of revealed religion as a whole. That this scheme should be expressed in accordance with some superstitions of the age was perfectly natural. The painters who preceded Michael Angelo in the decoration of the chapel had conceived, it is true, a grand cycle in the parallel between the Old and New Law, represented by the acts of Moses and Christ ; but their plan seems to have been already exhausted in the space they covered. On the other hand, Michael Angelo's superior learning need not be adduced to account for his adoption of the cycle he selected : the works which may have suggested it were accessible and familiar to all. Heinecken remarks that MSS. of the Speculum Salvationis appear to have existed in every Benedictine convent ; the earliest he saw was, he supposes, of the 12th century. * The subject of the Brazen Serpent occurs in the Biblia Pauperum. Chap. IL MICHAEL ANGELO AND HIS FOLLO\^^ERS. 313 The general order observed in these peculiar interpretations of Scripture was, as we have seen, closely followed, but in the selection of some subjects, as in the general treatment of all the designs in the chape!,. Michael Angelo was probably influenced by the desire of displaying the human figure. Every subject he has introduced had, however, in the interpretations alluded to, its symbolical meaning, and generally demanded as its antitype a New Testament subject below. In the sources above mentioned the type and antit}TDe are confronted, and in many instances the allusions are carefully explained : this is the case in the Speculum Salvationis, and often in illuminated Bibles ; that of Philip de Rouvre, Duke of Burgundy (14th century), which is preserved in the Royal Library at Paris, is a curious example, and there are several iu the British Museum. — Ed.] [NOTE ON THE FOUR SUBJECTS IN THE ANGLES OF THE CEILING. These four subjects represent, it is true, remarkable deliverances of the Jewish nation, but it is obvious that such themes could only be selected to adorn a papal chapel, on account of their typical meaning, and in order to explain them it is not sufficient to examine them in a spirit which is the result of our own time and creed ; it is also necessary to consider them with reference to the faith they illustrate, as received at the period when they were done. The great argument of the cycles of Scriptural representations, from first to last, was the Fall and the Atonement : to the latter every subject had reference, more or less directly ; but it is to be remembered that certain t)^es in the Old Testament were also considered to relate to the Virgin, and some- times to the Church. The three subjects in the centre of the ceiling — the Creation of Adam, the Creation of Eve, and the Fall and Expulsion from Paradise — were not unin- tentionally made so prominent in situation. The Creation of Eve, though occupying one of the smaller compartments, it is to be remarked, forms the central subject of the whole ceiling. It is always made thus important in the cycles of Scriptural types, in allusion to the Messiah being born of the woman alone. The four subjects at the angles — David Beheading Goliath, Judith with the Head of Holofernes, the Punishment of Haman, and the Brazen Serpent — are types of the Redemption ; at the same time they are connected, as intermediate symbols, with the subjects of the ceiling. In the Speculum Salvationis (c. 13), the first of these accompanies Christ's victory over Satan in the Temptation, and is thus explained : — " Golias iste o-ygas superbus figuram tenet Luciferi, David autem Christus est, qui temptationem superbiae viriliter superavit." In the Biblia Pauperum the same subject typifies the Redeemer overcoming the power of Satan by liberating the saints from the Limbus (pi. 28). The inscription, " Signans te Christe Golyam conterit iste," appears, like the subject itself, to allude to the prophecy " ipse 314 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEISITURY. Book V. conteret caput tuum," — " it shall bruise thy head." '■ This reading, which is strictly true to the original, occurs in the earliest versions of the Bible ; yet in others, also very ancient, the passage is rendered " ipsa conteret caput tuum," according to which the woman herself hruhea her enenny's head. The authorized Vulgate agrees with the latter translation ; but if the subject of David and Goliath was intended to refer to the same passage, the conclusion is that both interpretations were recognized in the typical representations of the middle ages. The allusions in the sense of the Iloman version are of course unequivocal. In the work first quoted, a representation of the Virgin suiTOunded by the instruments of the passion, is the parallel subject to Judith after having beheaded Holofernes, and is thus described : — " Maria per com- passionem vicit adversarium nostrum dyabolum : ipsa enim prsefigurata per Judith quae restitit Holoferni. Tunc impletae sunt in ipsa olim prajraonstratae ficrurae, et quaedam prophetica dicta sacrae scripturae : — ' Et tu Sathane insi- diaberis calcaneo ejus (Mariae) homines impugnando ; ipsa conteret caput tuum per passionem te superando.' " The same prophecy, here distinctly quoted, — " it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel," — is the key to the subjects in question, for the two opposite types are as evidently intended to illustrate the concluding words of the same verse : they allude to the permitted and limited power of the evil one, and the ultimate redemption ; but still with the same double application to Christ and the Madonna, — the Brazen Sei-pent surrounded by the suffering Israelites alluding to the former, the Retributive Punishment of Haman,*and Triumph of Esther, to the latter. The type of the Brazen Serpent is probably frequent in MS. Bibles ; in the Biblia I'auperum it accompanies the Crucifixion (pi. 25), with the inscrip- tions, " Icti curantur sei-pentem dum speculantur," — " Eruit a tristi baratro nos passio Christi." The intercession of Esther with Ahasuerus is the type of the intercession of the Virgin ; the two subjects appear together in the Speculum Salvationis (c. 39) : the following extract from the description explains their connexion : — " Tunc ilia praecipit populum suum ab iniquo Aman defendi. Hester de gente Judaeorum paupercula puella fuerat, et earn rex Assuerus pro omnibus eligerat et reginam constituerat. Ita Deus pro omnibus virginibus Mariam elegit — Et per ejus interventionem nostrum hostem condemnavit." The above allusions to the Madonna had been long consecrated in the Church of Rome : that others far more recondite and fan- ciful were also common, may be gathered fi-om the examples adduced and condemned by Erasmus in his " Ecclesiastes." — Ed.] ' " Ai;d I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed ; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel." Gen. iii. 15. " The circumstance of Haman being represented crucified agrees with Dante's description of the same subject (Purg., c. 17); and appears to be warranted by the original. Compare with Acts x. 39. Chap. III. OTHER MASTERS OF FLORENCE. 315 CHAPTER III. OTHER MASTERS OF FLORENCE. Besides Leonardo and Michael Angelo, several other artists were formed in Florence, who, without reaching' the depth and sublimity of these two masters, deserve to be ranked near them by great and peculiar qualities. The first of these is Baccio della Porta, who took the name of Fra Bartolommeo when he entered the Dominican convent of S. Marco at Florence (1469-1517). Originally formed in the scliool of Cosimo Rosselli, he afterwards adopted a style more conso- nant to his own taste, under the influence probably of the works of Leonardo. As an artist, Fra Bartolommeo was characterized by a calm seriousness, unaffected dignity and grace. The religious expression of his holy figures proceeds from a conscious elevation, and is no longer the result of a mere sentimentality, as in the older masters. A mild dignity — the attribute of Leonardo and his school — pervades these figures, and in his Madonnas the expression of holiness is happily blended with feminine beauty. But the circle in which he moves is limited. Generally speaking, we feel the want of that inward power so essential to the perfection and even conception of grand and elevated subjects. In these he appears sometimes cold and formal, sometimes impetuous and wanting in repose. As respects his technical qualities, his colouring, especially of the nude, is unusually soft : he ap- pears, also, to have imbibed Leonardo's peculiarly melting execution ; his drapery, too, is excellent. The use of wooden lay-figures was introduced by him, and was the means of con- siderably improving the study of drapery. His compositions are generally simple Madonnas, surrounded by Angels, but he renders them imposing by splendid architecture and a skilful disposition of the groups. In these pictures he de- lights to introduce boy-angels, sometimes seated and playing on instruments, sometimes hovering around the Madonna, bearing her mantle, or the dais of the throne itself. In the gallery of the UflSzj at Florence are two small miniature * p 2 316 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. pictures of Fra Bartolomtneo's early time — the Birth and Cir- cumcision of Christ ; the composition is particularly pleasing and dignified, the arrangement of the drapery excellent, and the execution extremely delicate. Already, even in these early works, the fine character of the artist's talent is visible, although it was not emphatically developed till a later period. In the year 1500, wounded to the soul by the execution of Savonarola, his most intimate and venerated friend, he entered into a convent, and during four years never touched a pencil. His love of life and Art was i-eawakeiied principally through the influence of the youthful Raphael, who arrived at Florence in 1504, and stimulated him to fresh exertions. Among the best works of Fra Bartolommeo's pencil, now existing, are some simple compositions of the Madonna and Child, often to be met with in galleries (some of the most beautiful are in the Uffizj and Academy at Florence) or altarpieces, with the Madonna and various Saints. A specimen of this latter kind, representing the patron-saints of Florence, is also in the Uffizj. It is a particularly dignified and animated composition (St. Anna here occupies the highest place ; the Madonna is seated a step lower), but it is only dead-coloured, in chiaroscuro, for, unhappily, the artist died before he could execute it. His best altar-pictures of this kind are in Lucca ; the Madonna della Misericordia, in S. Romano, is especially worthy of notice. In this the Madonna sits with gracious mien among a host of pious votaries (44 heads), whom she protects with her mantle from the Avrath of heaven. Also a beautiful Madonna with Saints in S. Martino. The gallery of the Pitti Palace at Florence is rich in works by Fra Bartolommeo. The most celebrated is the St. Mark ; this picture is highly extolled for its sublimity, but perhaps betrays the deficiency of manly energy before alluded to. Two figures of Prophets, in the tribune of the Uffizj, are similar in style, but not so important. Still more beautiful, from its harmonious, solemn dignity, is a S. Vincenzio, brought from the convent of St. Mark to the gallery of the Academy. Also a representation of Christ after his ascension, surrounded by the Evangelists, and two genii holding a shield, in the Pitti Palace, though not satis- factory in a spiritual sense, is of solemn arrangement and A Jroiip from Fra Bartolomnoeo'a picture in 3. Romano at Lucca. pa^e 31P. ST. MAEK ; by Fra Baxtolommeo. page 316. Chap. III. OTHER MASTERS OF FLOREXCE. 317 great outward beauty of motive. A large Madonna with Saints, in the same gallery, has greatly darkened with age, but is said to have been one of his principal works. A number of charming heads in fresco, formerly in S. Maria Maddalena, near Florence, are now preserved in the Academy, We do not enumerate all the works of this artist in the galleries of Florence, but we must not omit a very interesting but now much injured fresco which adorns the wall of a chapel in a small court of S. Maria Nuova. It represents the Last Judgment ; and in the Apostles sitting on each side of Christ we are forcibly reminded of Raphael's " Disputa," as well as of the Last Judgment of Oreagua, in the Campo Santo at Pisa. 'I he draperies of the Apostles are particularly excel- lent. The works of Fra Bartolommeo are rare out of Tus- cany. An Assumption of the Virgin, in the Studj Gallery at Kaples, is ascribed to him, and. with the exception of the principal figure, is worthy of the master. Two grand altar- pieces of 1505-1507, and 1515, are in the Louvre. A Ma- donna with Christ and the Baptist, in the collection of Lord Cowper at Panshanger, is distinguished fi'om Fra Barto- lommeo's other smaller works not only in composition and colouring, but in the tender melancholy which pervades the whole. Two standing figures of St. Peter and St. Paul, as large as life, were executed during a short residence in Pome. Tlie first was completed by Raphael after Bartolom- meo's departure. They are now in the Quirinal. An excellent Madonna with Saints is in the cathedral at Besan^on, opposite the south doorway. Finally, his Presentation in the Temple, veil known by the engraving, is in the Imperial Gallery at Vienna ; a neat sketch of it is in the Ufltizj Gallery at Florence. Mariotto Albertinelli was the friend and fellow scholar of Fra Bartolommeo, and an imitator of his style. A very cele- brated picture by him is in the gallery of the Uflfizj at Flo- rence ; tlie subject is the Salutation. It contains the two figures of Mary and Elizabeth only, but the arrangement is simple and noble, the drawing excellent, the colouring power- ful, and the expression earnest and finely intended, but perhaps in a slight degree constrained. In the Academy at Florence there are also several clever pictures, parts of which are very 318 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. graceful, by this master. In the Berlin Museum there is an Assumption of the Virgin, the upper part by Fra Bartolommeo, the lower by Mariotto Albertinelli. An early picture of the year 1506, the Virgin and Child standing upon a pedestal be- tween two kneeling saints, is delicate and graceful, but not comparable with Fra Bartolommeo in energy. It is in the Louvre. Among the scholars of Fra Bartolommeo may be mentioned Fra Paolo da Pistoja. In the Royal Gallery of Vienna there is a large altar-picture by him, ^n the style of his master. He inherited Fra Bartolommeo's drawings, and made use of them for his own pictures. After him the drawings fell into the hands of a Dominican nun, Plautilla Nelli, Avho also formed her style from them ; but she appears as a feeble, sentimental imitator. The general style of Fra Bartolommeo was followed by a later Florentine artist, Andrea Vanucchi, commonly called Andrea del Sarto,* from his father's trade (1488-1530). In the Avorks of this painter there is, however, less of the reli- gious seriousness of the elder master, less of his sincerity in the treatment of holy subjects. The pictures of Andrea, on the contrary, are generally characterized by a mere amiable cheer- fulness, a childlike innocent gaiety. The easily-known type of his female heads is in no way derived from the ideal, but is merely, as with many a painter of the fifteenth century, a generalising of one single individual. Neither has this artist a rich fancy, as is proved by his historical pictures ; but his numerous Madonnas are always pleasing when in his own pecu- liar style, and so long as his fine execution does not degenerate to empty mannerism. Originally Andrea was of the school of Pietro di Cosimo, and preserved some of the peculiarities of his master, particularly in his small pictures with landscape back- grounds. He soon, however, became independent ; his style, at first youthfully constrained and severe, was at a later period peculiarly soft and delicate in the modelling of the forms. Among the earliest of Andrea's works are the frescos which he executed in the court of the Compagnia dello Scalzo at ' Biadi, Notizie inedite della Vita d'Andiea del Sarto, raccolte da mano- scritti e documenti autentici ; Firenze, 1830. — Andrea del Sarto, von Alfred Reumont ; Leipzig, 1835. Chap. III. OTHER MASTERS OF FLORENCE. 319 Florence.' All the paintings now remaining are in chiaro- scuro, and, with the exception of some allegorical figures, represent the history of St. John the Baptist. Those first painted were the Baptism of Christ, the Preaching of John, and the Baptism of the People. With the dry angular manner of the old school these already imite pleasing, correct drawing and dignity of character. The rest of these pictures belong to a later period of the artist's practice, and are of unequal merit ; the last executed — the Birth of John — is, however, very excellent: it is a simple, effective composition, with veiy beautiful figures. Although these paintings have suffisred, they can yet be tolerably well made out. In consequence of the celebrity of these first-mentioned frescos a similar work was entrusted to Andrea in tlie court of the SS. Annunziata at Florence. Alessio Baldovinetti had already begun the subject of the Nativity, and Cosimo Rosselli had also painted a compartment. Andrea commenced with the history of S. Filippo Benizzi, which he completed in five large coloured pictures. These are among the most beautiful of his produc- tions ; they are in some parts very simple and severe in exe- cution, but have an expression of steiling dignity which is rarely found in his other works. One of their peculiar features is the beautiful landscape backgrounds. The fourth picture is particularly remarkable, both as regards its composition and the lively interest with which the story is told ; it repre- sents the Death of the Saint, and a Boy Restored to Life. The fifth excels in the harmony of its light and shade and colouring ; the subject is Children Healed by touching the garment of the Saint. Some time after Andrea painted in the same court the Birth of the Virgin, also an excellent work, and an Adoration of the Kings, with numerous figures. Another painting by him, in the great court of the same convent (in the lunette over the entrance), is of a considerably later period (1525) ; it is known by the name of the Madonna del Sacco — a simple Holy Family, in which Joseph is repre- sented leaning on a sack. This is one of the artist's most celebrated works : the forms are grand, the composition has an agreeable repose, and the drapeiy is masterly. ' Pitture a Fresco di Andrea del Sarto ; Firenze, 1823. 320 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Before we pass to Andrea's easel-pictures another important fresco must be mentioned, in the refectory of the convent of S. Sal vi, near Florence, of the year 1526-7. It represents the Last Supper, with the usual arrangement of the figures ; it resembles, for instance, Leonardo da Vinci's composition, but is not to be compared with that work in the profound conception of the subject. The division of the groups is peculiar ; the single figures are finelj^ characterized. The easel-pictures of Andrea are very numerous : their subjects are principally confined to the simple circle of Ma- donnas, Holy Families, and similar alturpieces ; in these his peculiar qualities are most freely developed. Pictures of this kind, belonging to his early time, are very rare. One, which he painted for the convent of S. Gallo, and wiiich is now in the Pitti palace, shows a finer and deeper earnestness than is xisual in his works ; it is an Annunciation, and reminds us in some respects of Francia. In other pictures — in one, for example, of the same subject, in the same place (No. 27), the influence of Michael Angelo is visible — an influence wliich can hardly be said to have operated favourably on the style of Andrea. The most beautiful example of this artist's own manner is the Madonna di S. Francesco, in the tribune of the Uflfizj at Florence. The Madonna with the Child stands on a low altar, supported by two boy-angels ; St. Francis and St. John the Evangelist stand beside her : the expression of both the saints is bland and dignified. Among the altarpieces which are now in the Pitti Palace, the so-called Disputa della SS. Trinita is peculiarly fitted to exhibit Andrea's aflfinity with the Venetian school. This is a " Santa Conversazione" of six Saints. St. Augustin is speaking with the highest in- spiration of manner ; St. Dominic is being convinced with his reason ; St. Francis with his heart ; St. Lawrence is looking earnestly out of the picture ; while St. Sebastian and the IVIagdalen are kneeling in front, listening devoutly. "We here find the most admirable contrast of action and expression, combined with the highest beauty of execution, especially of colouring. A Dead Cluist, with the mourners around him, symmetrically composed, which Andrea was fond of, is rich in fine details. Besides these, there is a considerable number of Chap. III. OTHER MASTERS OF FLOREXCE. 321 Andrea's works, all more or less excellent, In the Florentine galleries, especially in that of the Palazzo Pitti. In the year 1518 Andrea was invited into France by Francis I., a great lover of Art; for him and the great men of his court the artist executed a number of pictures : many of them still adorn the gallery of the Louvre. He was well received, and his reraimeration was such as he could never have expected in Florence. Yet he was induced to leave France in the following year, under some pretext, by the im- portunities of his capricious and tyrannical wife ; and even to embezzle the sums entrusted to him by the king for the pur- chase of works of Art in Italy. lie afterwards deeply repented his folly, but never regained the favour of the king. His conduct drew upon him many reproaches even in his native place, and the consciousness of disgrace certainly had a re- pressing influence on the free exercise of his talent. Of those pictures which he executed at Fontainebleau, only his principal one, a Carita, is preserved in the Louvre. This is the well- known group of a Mother with three Children, and (in spite of various injuries, and also of the destruction to which, in common with all the other pictures in the long gallery at the Louvre,' it is rapidly hastening) it is still of powerful effect of colouring : the forms, however, are neither noble nor well chosen. Andrea's pictures are frequent in other galleries besides those of Florence and Paris : a whole collection of Madonnas and Holy Families, by himself and his scholars, is in the Borghese Palace at Rome. Some very excellent speci- mens are in Munich, Vienna, Berlin, and Dresden. But it is by no means to be supposed that all the works which bear his name are genuine. One of his last and most celebrated pictures is in Dresden — the Sacrifice of Abraham — done in 1529. Marc' Antonio Franciabigio, the friend and companion of ' The wretched condition of the pictures in the Dresden Gallery, which is so much deplored, is not to be compared with the systematic ruin of those iu this part of the Louvre. For further informatinn oii this head we refer our readers to the perpetual complaints of certain French journals, and to Waa- gen's ' Paris,' p. 679. Those which survive the daily dust during the Exhi- bition, and the damp exhalations of the neighbouring Seine, are sure to be destroyed by the periodical " Restorations." Whoever wishes to see the.se pictures must lose no time. r 3 322 MASTERS OF THE SESTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Andrea, resembles him in manner, although he never reached his naivete and freedom. He painted two pictures in the court of the Scalzo, next to Andrea's — John receiving the Blessing of his Parents before he goes into the Wilderness, and his First Meeting with the youthful Christ. In the court of the SS. Annunziata he painted the Marriage of the Virgin. In all these works he appears a successful iuiitator of his friend. The monks uncovered this last work before it w-as finished, which so enraged the artist that he gave the head of the Virgin some blows with a hammer, and w-as with difficulty prevented from destroying the whole. The traces of these blows remain, for neither Franciabigio nor any other artist would repair the injury. In his easel-pictures he is seldom important. Jacopo Carucci, commonly called Pontormo, from his native city, was a scholar of Andrea : his talents strongly excited the jealousy of his master, who forced him by injurious treat- ment to leave his studio. In the court of the SS. Annunziata, Jacopo painted the Salutation, or Visit of Mary to Elizabetli ; it has great grandeur in the forms. In the Uffizj there is an excellent portrait by him of Cosmo de' Medici, vivid and warm in colour. Tliere are excellent portraits by this artist elsewhere — for example, in the Berlin Museum. Two other scholars of Andrea are not to be forgotten, Jacone and Do- raenico Puligo, who frequently took a part in the works of their master. The pictures of Domenico, particularly his numerous Holy Families (in the Borghese and Colonna Gal- leries at Rome, the Pitti Palace at Florence, &c.) are so much in the manner of Andrea as to be frequently mistaken for that painter's works, only that the natural grace of Andrea is here lost in vagueness and uncertainty. The Florentine, 11 Rosso, was also employed in the court of the SS. Annunziata with Andrea and the above-named artists. He painted in it an Assumption of the Virgin, an animated and solemn picture, less noble and less clear in composition, however, than the other frescos of this place, and not without some indication of mannerism. A certain fantastic manner, peculiar to this artist, distinguishes him from the rest of the Florentines. In the galleries of Florence Chap. III. OTHER BLISTERS OF FLORENCE. 323 and in other part*; of Italy we find many pictures by his hand ; upon the whole, Jiowever, they are scarce even there. A large Aladomia with saints, in the manner of Andrea del Sarto, is in the Pitti Palace. II Rosso spent the most active period of his life in France, in the service of Francis I. (under the name of Maitre Roux), superintending the em- bellishments of the palace at Fontainebleau. A Salutation of the Virgin, of Ids best time, now in the Louvre, shows equally the influence of Fra Bartolommeo as of Andrea del Sarto. An Entombment in the same gallery is coldly antique and very mannered. Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, the son of Domenico Ghirlandajo, was an artist of extraordinary talent ; he passed from the school of his father and uncle (David Ghirlandajo) into that of Fra Bai'tolommeo, and there formed a beautiful manner of his own. When Raphael arrived in Florence, in 1504, Ridolfo cultivated a close friendship with him. At a later pericid Raphael urged him to take a part in his great works in the Vatican, but Ridolfo did not accede to this request. Two of his paintint's wife, Magia Ciarla, and their only surviving son, Raphael, were the originals. The circular picture in S. Andrea is partly copied, by an unknown hand, from one of Raphael's latest woiks — the Holy Family, now in the Louvre, painted for Francis I. See Passavant, Rafael von Urbino, i. 41, 42.— Ed.] THt l.Uiuu^L,AS OF RAPHAEL. REFERENCES. T.. LiNDON, Vies et CEuvres des Peintxep. Paris, 4to, 1S05-9. (Raphafcl.) P. PAS8AV4NT, Raphael von Urbino. Leipzig, 1839, vol. 2. p. Page of the present work. 1. Berlin, P. J3, p. 329. 5. Del Gran Duca, Florence, P. 35, p. 334. S. With SS. Francis and Jerome, Berlin, P. 19, 50. St. Luke painting the Madonna, Raphael looking p. 329. on, Rome, L. 132, P. 41G, p. 386. 1. In Casa Connestabile, Perugia, P. 34, p. 330. THE MADONNAS OF JlAPnAEL. 8. Naples (from St. Antonio convent, Perugia), 14. Orleems, L. 146, P. 59, p. 339. P. 39, p. 335. 15. Cani^iam, Munich, L. 424, P. 68, p. 339. 9. Blenheim (1505), P. 43, p. 336. 16. Pink, P. 79, p. 339. 10. CardeUino, Florence, P. 4S, p. 333. 17. Tempi, Munich, L. 426, P. 81, p. 333. 11. Vienna (1606), P. 49, p. 337. 18. Madonna and Sleeping Child, P. 82, p. 372, note. 12. With the Palm-tree, London, L.3-27, P. SI, p. 337. 19. Panshangor, P. S3, p, 339. 13. Beardless Joseph, St Petersburg, P. 56, p. 340. 20. Colonna, Berlin, P. 31, p. 339. Chap. IV. EAPHAEL. 329 grief of the Madonna, are given with indescribable intensity. Various easel-pictures are also attributed, with more or less certainty, to Raphael alone during this time. They bear the general stamp of the Umbrian school, but in its highest beauty. The tender, enthusiastic sentimentality which is the general characteristic of this scliool, may be said to harmonize well with the character of generous youth. So long as works of art done under such an influence seem to breathe the fresh aspirations of the youthful mind, they must of necessity appear true and pure ; but when, at an advanced period of life, this sentiment and aspiration are not ripened into depth of cha- racter and energetic decision, then does this youthful tender- ness, as we have before remarked in the instance of the Umbrian masters, necessarily degenerate into constraint, and become mere manner and mechanism. The foundation of a noble manhood, undeveloped as it is in the early works of Raphael, is nevertheless apparent in his pure and clear con- ceptions ; his youthful efforts are essentially youthful, and seem to contain the earnest of a high development. This it is which invests his early productions with so peculiar and great an interest. A few may be mentioned which are tole- rably well authenticated. First, some Madonnas ; two are in the Berlin Museum. In the one, the Madonna reads in a book ; the Child on her lap holds a goldfinch in his hand (I)'. The attitude of the mother is unaffected and simple ; the per- fectly oval countenance has an expression of peace and repose — not free, however, from constraint ; the Child is not beau- tiful ; the forms are as yet awkwardly rendered ; the attitude is affected.^ A second picture of perhaps two years earlier date, with heads of St. Francis and St. Jerome introduced below the Virgin (3), is better. Here, the countenance of the Madonna, who turns affectionately to the Child with an expression of the deepest, most fervent feeling, is equally [' In order to enable the reader to identify each Madonna picture, we add the number corresponding with that in the illustration. — Ed.] * Between these two pictures Passarant places (ii. 14) the small pictures of various Predellas : a Baptism of Christ, and a Resurrection, in the Munich Gallery — an Adoration of the Kings, in th« castle of Christiansburg, near Copenhagen — the Sacrifices of Cain and Abel, in Mr. Emerson's possession in London— and others. 330 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. tender and gentle as in the other picture, and is free from its defects ; the figure of the Child is better drawn : the heads of the two saints are very excellent, with a character of gentle- ness and piety. The geneial arrangement is agreeably and judiciously contrived, and the picture is executed with great softness and warmth. Similar to it, but mucli more finished, is a small round picture of the Madonna in the Casa Con- nestabile (4) at Perugia. The Virgin (a Ijalf-figure) stands in a landscape, reading, while the C'liild in her arms also looks into the book. Tlie head of the Virgin indicates a pro- gressive development of the freest, finest kind ; the Child, too, is lovely. It is a miniature painting of inexpres>ibly delicate and beautiful execution. Of scmiewhat earlier date, probably, was the Madonna of the Countess Anna Alfani (2) at Perugia, also one of the loveliest pictures of this style. The Virgin, witli her eyes cast down in humility, is hokling the Child, who is standing upon lier lap : above are two cherub heads. Next to these may be mentioned a large altarpiece — an Adoration of the Kings (not painted later tiian 1503), which has passed from the Ancajani family of Spoleto to the Berlin Museum. The general motives of this rich composition re- semble the Umbrian school, in the treatment of similar sub- jects ; the same resemblance is observable in the attitudes of the figures, and in the management of the drapery ; but the heads are remarkable for a peculiar refinement, and the forms have great purity and delicacy. The Child lies on a coverlet on the ground, in the middle of the picture. Infantine love- liness is pleasingly developed in its form. On one side, where the stall is, tiie mother reverentially kneels, and ne.\t to her, two beautiful angels, like attendants, kneel likewise ; St. «loseph stands behind her. On the other side the kings ap- proach with a numerous retinue ; the first, dignified and serious, is already kneeling down : the vivacity of youth expressed in the head of the youngest king is very interesting : three graceful angels, borne on clouds, are singing above these groups. A rich arabesque frame encloses the whole : in the upper corners are represented two sibyls ; in the lower, two saints. This picture is painted in distemper {a guazzo), on Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 331 canvas, and has, alas ! suffered so much from damp that the colours are not only faded, but in some parts have fallen off, leaving the well-felt preparatory outline visible.' A picture very similar to this in composition is in the gallery of the Vatican. The Virgin kneels on one side of the Infant, Joseph on the other ; in the middle distance are the shepherds ; in the background the kings advance to worship. The picture appears, however, to have come from the studio of Perugino, for though we recognize the hand of Raphael in some parts, in others that of Lo Spagna and other less important artists is visible.* Another important picture of this time, which shows the progress of the young painter, is the Coronation of the Virgin, painted for the church of S. Francesco at Perugia, in 1503, but now in the Vatican. In the upper part, Christ and the Madonna are throned on clouds and surrounded by angels with musical instruments ; underneath, the disciples stand around the empty tomb. In this lower part of the picture there is a very evident attempt to give the figures more life, motion, and enthusiastic expression than was before attempted in the school (for instance in the beautiful heads of three youths looking upwards), an effort which, owing to the want of complete practical mastery, has occasioned several failures and not a little mannerism, though unquestionably with some beautiful exceptions. The Christ, in expression at least, is unsuccessful ; but the head, figure, and mien of the Vii-gin are modest and beautiful. The predella was adorned with elegant miniature-like pictures of the Annunciation, the Adoration of the Kings, and the Presentation in the Temple : they are in the same gallery.* ' See Dr. Waagen, 'über das Gemälde Raphaels aus dem Hause Ancajani,' in the Museum ''Blätter für bildende Kunst," 1834, No. 18, viz., Doubts have been raised as to whether this picture is entiiely by Raphael. In point of composition it belongs unquestionably to the school, which is proved by the picture in the Vatican, and also by other school pictures of the same subject, only that it is finer and better understood here than in the repeti- tions. Setting this aside, however, and granting that the very conventional character of the drapery tells agamst our argument, yet there is no question that the exquisitely beautiful and intellectual heads are the work of Raphael, since neither his master nor his fellow-pupils could have created such. * [The head of Joseph is probably by Raphael. — Ed.] ä For other smaller works of this description, see Passavant, i. 69 ; and ii. 25. 332 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. The works of Raphael, in conjunction v. ith Pinturicchio, in the Libreria of the Duomo at Siena, also belong to this period. But his participation in this undertaking appears to have been limited to some designs : two beautiful drawings by him for these subjects are still preserved ; one is in the Uffizj at Florence ; the other in the Casa Baldeschi at Perugia. They are greatly superior in delicacy of feeling, grace, and freedom to the paintings in the Libreria ; thus proving tliat Raphael could have had no share in the execution of the latter. After these works Raphael appears to have quitted the school of Perugino and to have commenced an independent career: he executed at this time some pictures in the neigh- bouring town of Citta di Castello. With all the features of the Umbrian school, thev already show the freer impulse of his own mind, — a decided effort to individualize. The most excellent of these, and the most interesting example of this first period of Raphael's development, is the Marriage of the Virgin (Lo Sposalizio), inscribed with his name, and the date 1504, and at present in the Brera at Milan. The arrange- ment is simple and beautiful ; — Mary and Joseph stand oppo- site to each other in the centre ; the high priest, between them, joins their hands ; Joseph is in the act of placing the ring on the tinger of the bride : beside Mary is a group of tlie virgins of tlie Temple ; near Joseph are the suitors, who break their barren wands, — that which Joseph holds iii his hand has blos- somed into a lily, which, according to the legend, was the sign that he was the chosen one.' In the background is the lofty Temple, adorned with a peristyle.* With much of the stiffness and constraint of the old school, the figures are noble and dignified ; the countenances, of the sweetest style of beauty, are expressive of a tender, enthusiastic melancholy, which lends a peculiar charm to this subject, inappropriate as it is in more animated representations. • [See the Flos Sanctorum and Evang. Mariae. — Ed.] * [This beautiful architectural design, it appears, was copied (but very much improved) from a picture of the same subject by Perugino, now in the Museum of Caen in Noimandy. The general form and proportions were pro- bably sug2;ested in the first instance by Brunelleschi's design for the octagon (externally sixteen-sided) chapel of the Scolari annexed to the church Degl' Ano-eli at Florence; the building itself remained unfinished. — Ed.] THE MARRIAGE OF THE VIRGIN j by Raphael, now in the Brera at Milan. page 332. Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 333 In the year 1504, Raphael painted a Christ on the Mount of Olives, at Urbino, a picture of noble composition and of the most delicate execution, now in the possession of Piince Gabrielli at Rome.' It is remarkable here to observe how obviously Raphael was constrained by the limits prescribed by his school. Judas and his myrmidons are here sweet and dignified forms, who seem to harbour anything but violence and treachery in their hearts. The two graceful little pictures also, in the Louvre, St, George and St. Michael, appear to have been painted at tliis time for the Duke of Urbino : St. George, a noble and slender figure on a white horse, is attacking the dragon with his sword, having already trans- fixed him with his lance. In the landscape in the back- ground is the figure of the liberated princess. The beautiful and youthful figure of the Archangel Michael, clad in armour, is represented treading on the neck of the dragon and striking at him with his sword. In the dark landscape we see monsters of every kind, condemned souls plagued by demons, and a burning town according to the 8th and 23rd books of Dante's Inferno. The execution of both these little pictures is very careful, but at the same time light and bold. The St. George has been much injured and is much over- painted. The Knight dreaming, a small picture, formerly in the possession of Lady Sykes, and now in the National Gallery at London, is supposed to have been painted a year earlier. It represents a youth in armour lying sleeping under a laurel, with a female form on each side. The one in a crimson robe is offering him a book and a sword ; the other, richly dressed, is presenting flowers as symbols of the pleasures of life. This is one of the finest allegories in the manner of Giorgione. In the autumn of the year 1504 Raphael went to Flo- rence.^ Tuscan art had at this period attained its highest per- fection, and the most celebrated artists were there contending for the palm. New examples were offered to the aspiring spirit of youth, and pointed out the path to excellence. A new gera * [Now in England, in the possession of Mr. Coningham. — Ed.] * A record quoted by Gaye, Cartegg. 2, p. 68, proves that Perugino also spent part of the summer of 1505 at Florence. According to a note of certain expenses, ib. p. 89, it would seem that Leonardo da Vinci at all events visited Florence in the summer of 1505, and Michael Angelo the same. 334 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. now commences in Raphael's development : from this period begins his emancipation from the confined manner of Peru- gino's school ; the youth now ripened into independent man- hood, and acquired the free mastery of form. If the earlier works of Raphael are the expression of his own mild spirit, the greater part of those which immediately follow are charac- terized by an unconstrained and cheerful conception of life.' At this time the celebrated Madonna del Granduca (5) is said to have been executed. This, though generally displayed in the Pitti gallery, is the private possession of the Grand Ducal family of Tuscany. Here the Madonna holds the infant tran- quilly in her arms, and looks down in deep thought. Although slightly and very simply painted, especially in the nude, this picture excels all Raphael's previous Madonnas in that wonder- ful charm which only the realisation of a profound thought could produce. We feel that no earlier painter had ever understood to combine such free and transcendent beauty with an expression of such deep foreboding. This picture is the last and liighest condition of which Perugmo's type was capable. The Madonna also belonging to the Duke of Terra Nuova (6) at Naples, appears to have been the creation of this time. The Virgin is represented sitting in a rocky landscape, Avith the child on her lap, who, together with the little Baptist, is hold- ing a scroll. A third child is leaning at the Virgin's knee, gazing tenderly up at the infant Saviour. Raphael's visit to Florence must, however, have been but of short duration,* for in the succeeding year we find him I The influence of the cartoons by Leonardo and Jlichael Angelo is alluded to at p. 284. On Raphael's relation to Fra Bartolommeo, seep. 316; to Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, p. 323. * Here it will be right to mention that fresco of the Last Supper, disco- vered in October, 1845, in what was formerly the convent of S. Onofrio at Florence (Via Faenza, No. 4771), although we have not yet been able to decide in our own mind whether it be really a work of Raphael's. The question of its genuineness has brought forward many estimable authorities for and against, to whom we should much prefer merely to refer the reader, were it not that the view of Raphael's whole course of development depends too much on this at all events veiy interesting fresco, for us to withhold such opinions as we have formed. The first general impression caused by this picture is, that it is a work of Pinturicchio — or one of not purely Florentine origin, but combined of mixed Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 335 employed on several large works in Perugia ; these show for the first time the influence of the Florentine art in the purity, fulness, and intelligent treatment of form ; at the same time many of the motives of the Peruginesque school are still apparent. The first of these works which claims our notice was that executed for the convent of S. Antonio of Padua, at Perugia, once in the possession of the Colonna family at Rome, now in the royal palace at Naples.' It represents the Madonna and Child on a throne, in a heavy style of archi- tecture, adorned with a canopy. On the steps of the throne the little St. John worships the infant Christ, who blesses him, while the Virgin gently draws him nearer. The infant Christ, Peruginesque and Florentine influences. An unprepared spectator would scarcely suppose it to be the production of Raphael. Not only do the some- what broad heads differ materially fiom the type of his Coronation of the Virgin, of his Sposalizio, and his fresco at S. Severo — not only is the firm and well-practised handling utterly opposed to Raphael's early timid touch (see, for example, the fresco at S. Severo), but the composition is in itself an argu- ment against the supposition. It is psychologically improbable that Raphael, impressed as he was with the most powerful works of Leonardo da Vinci, and also perhaps with those of Michael Angelo, should, at the moment when his artistic tendencies were most, strongly excited in a new direction, have resigned himself passively to the old traditional mode of representing this sub- ject — a mode which the Ghirlandaj had practised — and that at a time when the fame of Leonardo's Last .Supper had spread far and wide, and sketches or descriptions must, at all events, have reached him. Granting even the read- ing of the very doubtful inscription on the upper border of the robe of the St; Thomas, viz. " R(a)PH(ael) UR(binus) MD et V," it proves nothing for the whole picture, but can only be taken as evidence in favour of that .'■epa- rate and certainly extremely beautiful head. In other cases, for instance in the church flag of Citta di Castello, in la belle Jardiniere, &c., Raphael has not hesitated to inscribe his name upon the robe of the principal figure, even though it were that of the First Person of the Trinity. External evidence also makes the idea of Raphael's being the author of this work almost incredible. Florence, in the year 1505, overflowed with native talent, and, in part, of the first order — with professors who were very tenacious of the mtioision even of distinguished foreign artists, to say nothing of one who, in that circle at least, was an unknown youth. Besides this, the short period of Raphael's first visit to Florence must have been employed with other things, and not with an extensive work, which would have engrossed him exclusively. A new world of works of art, from Masaccio's frescos to the latest and finest pro- ductions of his contemporaries, lay suddenly open before him; and if there was one period of his life in which we may be sure that new impressions were working actively in his mind, it was this. Meanwhile the history of art can only gain by investigations of this kind : a truly conclusive argument, whatever it may be, will be willingly admitted by every one. ' Rumohr assigns a somewhat earlier date to this picture. Ital. Forsch. iii. 32. 336 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. at the request of the sisterhood, is clothed in a little shirt. On the sides are St. Peter, St. Catherine, St. Paul, and St. Doro- thea.' In the lunette over the picture is God the Father — a half-figure, with two adoring angels, one on each side. The draperies in this picture, particularlj' in the powerful figures of the apostles, are already more free and broad : the heads of the men are dignified, those of the women tender and earnest, particularly that of St. Catherine, which is full of grace : the two children are beautifully artless. The small subjects of the predella are now dispersed. The Christ on the Mount of Olives is in the collection of Mr. Samuel Rogers, in London ; The Christ bearing his Cross, at Mr. Miles's of Leigh Court ; and the Dead Christ lamented by the Women and the Disciples, in the possession of Mr. "Whyte, of Barron-hill, Derbyshire.* Two other pictures are inscribed with the date 1505: one an altarpiece for the church of the Serviti at Perugia, now at Blenheim Castle, the seat of the Duke of Marlborough. It represents the Madonna and Child on a throne, with St. John the Baptist and St. Nicholas of Bari (9) — a picture of sur- passing beauty and dignity. Besides the dreamy intensity of feeling of the school of Perugia, we perceive here the aim at a greater freedom and truth of nature, founded on thorough study. The centre picture of the predella — the Preaching of St.^ John the Baptist — is at Bo wood, the seat of the Marquis of Lansdowne. (The small, so-called Pieta, belonging to Count Tosi at Brescia, representing the risen Saviour with the crown of thorns, and in the act of benediction, appears also to belong to the year 1505. The picture is charmingly executed and in good preservation.) The second is a fresco of some size m the lunette of a chapel in S. Severo at Perugia. Christ is in the centre, with the dove of the Holy Spirit above and two youthful angels beside him. Over the group is God the Father, with two 1 [According to Passavant, St. Rosalia. Both are generally crowned with roses, but St. Dorothea has sometimes a sword, and St. Rosalia is usually dressed as a nun. — Ed.] 2 [The Dead Christ passed from the possession of Count Rechberg to that of Sir Thomas Lawrence, and then became the property of Mr. Whyte, of Barron Hill. Two single figures in the predella, St. Francis and St. An- thony of Padua, are in the Dulwich Gallery. — Ed.] Raphael's first fresco ; painted in 8. Severe at Perugia. Chap. IV. KAPHAEL, 337 angels : this part of the picture is much injured. On each side of the middle group, and somewhat lower, are three saints, seated. It is a very grand composition, and reminds us, on the one hand, of Fra Bartolommeo's now ruined fresco in S. Maria Nuova at Florence, as well as of older paintings, and on the other it may be considered as the original of the upper portion of Raphael's own celebrated ' Disputa ' in the Vatican.' The figures of the saints are very dignified : the Christ is beautiful, and with a mild expression ; and the angels — at least the one on the left of the Saviour, folding his hands on his breast — most interesting and graceful. The drapery, although still severe, is well executed in grand lines and masses. The painting has unfortunately suffered materially, and the upper group is almost entirely destroyed. Under it is a niche, on each side of which are three saints, painted by Perugino in 1521, and painfully shoAnng the weakness of the surviving master. After finishing these works Raphael appears to have re- turned to Florence, where he remained (with the exception of some visits to Urbino and Perugia*) until tiie middle of the year 1508. The early paintings executed during this period betray, as might be expected, many reminiscences of the Peruginesque school, both in conception and execution ; the later ones follow in all essential respects the general style of the Florentines of this time. One of the earliest of these is the Holy Family with the Palm-tree (12), formerly in the Orleans collection, and now in the gallery of the Earl of Ellesmere, in London. It is a round picture : the Madonna sits under a fan palm, holding the infant Christ on her lap ; Joseph kneeling presents flowers to him. This last figure is either by an inferior hand or has been entirely painted over. To tliis picture may be added the Virgin in the Meadow (11), in the Belvedere gallery at Vienna. The Madonna is here represented in a beautiful landscape, and with both hands supports the infant Christ, who stands before her : she turns ' [The subject of Theology, painted by Raphael in the Vatican, and gene- rally called the 'Disputa (del t^aciameuto)'. — Ed.] ^ [And perhaps Bologna : see Passavant, i. 95. — Ed.] Q 338 MASTEES OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. with looks of love to the little St. John, wlio kneeling at the side offers a reed cross to his companion : — a picture of tender grace and sweetness, which shows the influence of Leonardo more than that of any other master in the expression of the lieads, in the forms of the children, and even in the drapery, and in the deep brownish tones of the landscape. Two other pictures show a close afiinity with this composition — the one is the Madonna del Cardellino (10), in the tribune of the Uffizj at Florence : here the little St. John presents a goldfinch to the infant Christ ; hence the name of the picture. The form and countenance of the Madonna are of the purest beauty ; her whole soul seems to breathe holiness and peace. John also is extremely sweet ; but the figure of the infant Christ does not fulfil the artist's intention, which appears to have been to represent the seriousness and dignity of a divine being in a childlike form ; both the figure and expression are rather stiflf and affected. The third of these pictures is the so-named Belle Jardiniere (21), inscribed 1507, in the gallery of the Louvre. It belongs to the latter part of Raphael's residence in Florence. In composition it certainly resembles the two last mentioned, but all that was unsatisfactory and incomplete in them has here disappeared. Tlie sweetest cheerfulness, grace, and innocence breathe from tliis picture. The Madonna sits among flowering shrubs, as in a gai'den (whence, perhaps, the name of the picture) ; Christ stands at her knee, while St. John kneels in childlike devotion. Unfortunately, the picture has been much injured, and is much overpainted. An old copy, which in later times has passed through many hands, is falsely given out as the original, and is probably the work of a Flemish artist. It is interesting to observe Raphael's progress in the small pictures which he painted in Florence — half- figures of the Madonna with the Child in her arms. In this instance, again, the earliest of the series are characterized by the deepest, tenderest feeling, while a freer and more cheerful enjoyment of life is apparent in the later ones. The Madonna della Casa Tempi, in Florence (17), now in the Munich Gallery, is the first of this series. Here the Virgin is tenderly pressing the Child, who nestles closely to her, and appears to whisper MADONNA DEL CAEDELLINO ; by Raphael, now in the Tribune of the Uffizj at Florence. page 338. Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 339 words of endearment. In this picture the Madonna is repre- sented standing: in the tliree following she is sitting. In one, the infant Christ looks out of the picture ; he sits on the Madonna's lap and holds by the bosom of her dress. The most simple of these is a small picture originally in the Orleans Gallery, and which was some years ago in the possession of M. Neuwenhuys, of London. In the highly executed but very spirited picture from the Colonna palace (20) at Rome, and now in the Berlin Museum, the same childlike sportive- ness, the same maternal tenderness, are developed with more harmonious refinement. The third, in the possession of Earl Cowper, at Panshanger (19), and inscribed with the year 1508, borders on mannerism in the forward boyish expression of tlie Child ; the countenance of the Madonna is, however, extremely sweet.' The fine composition of the Madonna with the Pink (16), the original of which is not known, belongs also, doubtless, to this Florentine time. The Virgin is holding the Child upon her lap, who is in lively action, and reaches gaily towards the pink, which she is giving to him. In the background is a window through which we see into the open air. A school picture of this subject was in the possession of the Cav. Camuccini — an excellent, but apparently free repe- tition, probably by Sassoferrato, is in the collection of Herr Mäglin at Basle. A larger representation of a Holy Family (15), belonging to the middle time of Raphael's Florentine period, is in the Munich Gallery. In the composition of this picture we observe a particular study of artificial grouping. On one side of the picture the Madonna, half kneeling, half sitting, leans over toward the other figures ; before her is the infant Christ : on the other side is Elizabeth in a similar attitude, and before her the little St. John : behind the women stands Joseph ; thus completing the group in a strictly pyramidal shape.* ' [Another Madonna and Child, of an earlier date (perhaps 1505), is in the same collection. See Passavant, Rafael von Urbino, ii. 37. — Ed.] '^ This extreme regularity may have been less perceptible before two groups of infant angels' heads in the upper part of the picture were removed, after having been spoilt by a so-called restoration in the Düsseldorf Gallery. In the Corsini Palace at Rome there is a Holy Family attributed to Fra Barto- lommeo, of almost the same composition, only without the St. Anna, so that the group, which is well united in the Munich picture, here seems to fall q2 340 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Although tliis disposition appears somewhat formal, and al- though the picture in other respects betrays an imperfect practice, yet even here there are many beautiful parts, and the playful affection of the children, on whom the parents look down, not without variety of action, at least accounts for a unity of feeling corresponding with the regularity of the arrangement. Another Holy Family, half-figures, in the Gallery of the Hermitage of St. Petersburg (13) — to judge from the en- graving — also appears to belong to this period. There is an evident leaning toward the direct imitation which characterized the naturalisti ' in the head of St. Joseph looking down on the Cliild, which is no longer observable hi the later works of Raphael, and may probably be ascribed to the influence of his friend Fra Bartolommeo, In the Oratory of the Escurial there is a Madomia, with the Child seated upon a Lamb (23), after a motive of Leonardo's, while Joseph, leaning upon a staff, is looking on. The picture is only underpainted, and is probably one of those which Raphael at his departure from Rome left unfinished. One of the best pictures of the latter part of this Florentme period is the St. Catherine in the possession of Mr. Beckford,* formerly in the Aldobrandini Gallery at Rome. The saint, a half-figure, stands leaning on the wheel, and looks up with heavenly enthusiasm to the ray of light descending upon her. Few even of the great masters have succeeded in giving this expression with so much truth, life, and interest. Beside these pictures, intended more for the purpose of domestic devotion, Raphael executed two large altar-pictures at Florence. One is the Madonna di Pescia (22), or, del Bal- dacchino, in the Palazzo Pitti at Florence. The Madonna and CMld are on a tin-one ; on one side stand St. Peter and asunder. The priority of composition belongs unquestionably to Raphael and I am tempted to think that the picture in the Corsini Palace, on account of its mannered execution, is not by Bartolommeo, but imitated from Raphael by one of his scholars. • [The tei-m naturalisti is applied by Italian, and nnturalistas by Spanish writers on Art, to painters of various schools, who imitated nature without sufficient selection. — Ed.] * [Now in the National Gallery. — Ed,] ^(2 ^^ ~Ä^ »^■fc^ ,- to this point, it is bearded. — Ed.] 3 It appears to be copied from the allegorical figure of Fortitude in the frescos of the Cambio at Perugia. 350 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. The entire cycle of these paintings thus belongs essentially to the domain of thought. The task allotted to the artist was to conceive pictorially a series of abstract ideas — to embody the immaterial in material forms. Similar attempts had been made at an eaidier period, in the time of Giotto and his fol- lowers. It will be interesting to review the means employed by a painter like Raphael, at the summit of the art, in the exe- cution of this difficult undertaking, and to consider the success he attained. In the three first pictures we at once observe a very happy conception in the solemn union of characters celebrated in one or other of the intellectual pursuits represented : they are brought together, as in the " Triumphs of Petrarch," without regard to the time in which they lived, but solely with refer- ence to their spiritual relation, their common efforts toward a high aim. They are thus easily separated into subordinate groups, according to their greater or less efficiency and influ- ence. But it was necessary to form one central point to define the object of their exertions. In the " Theology " this point is, properly speaking, the Altar with the Sacrament, as the unchanging symbol of re- demption, according to the ritual of the Church. The sacra- ment in itself explains to the Christian spectator the point to which the meditations of the assembled theologians were directed ; but after all it is merely a symbol, and presents nothing tangible to the mind or feelings. Hence the glory of Heaven, which represents the Saviour himself, and the Pro- phets and witnesses of his mission, is introduced above. By this means the picture produces its effect directly upon the mind of the spectator ; and so far as he understands the figures of the Christian mythology' there is no further difficulty to be explained. "With regard to unity of effect, the picture might, however, be criticised ; not so much because it is divided into tw^o separate parts, as that neither of these predominates by its mass — that neither, properly speaking, is the principal. In the "Poetiy" the figures of Apollo and the Muses at once explain the subject ; they are perfectly intelligible, as ' [The term " Christian mythology " is sometimes employed by Protestant writers in alluding to monastic legends. — Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 351 they belong to a well-known fable. Although the poets are assembled round them in familiar intercourse, the Muses and the god still appear, so to speak, as the hosts — the poets as the guests — of Parnassus. Thus is formed a well-connected whole, as agreeable to thought as to feeling, and the mind of the be- holder is attuned to corresponding serenity. The picture is like a refined and pleasing poem : the eye and mind easily comprehend it, while by degrees it unfolds a deeper meaning. In the " Philosophy," on the contrary, there is no definite explanation of its meaning, no allegorical, no poetical figures (for the statues of Apollo and Minerva, placed in niches at the sides, cannot be considered as such), to explain to us what spe- cial interest moves the assembly, at least the upper portion of it.' The subject does not present its deeper meaning imme- diately to our feelings, and prosaic understanding must under- take the task of explanation. The master has displayed his art in this instance not so much in the poetical effect of the whole, as in the grand arrangement of the mass and space — in the surpassing beauty of the single groups and figures, which in themselves undoubtedly give complete satisfaction to the eye. It has been asserted that Raphael was embarrassed by the subject, devoid as it would seem to be of dramatic interest. But among the paintings in the Spanish chapel at Florence we have had occasion to notice a subject of a very similar kind, which, notwithstanding all the defects and constraint it betrays in the means of representation, produces a much more direct and powerful eflfect on the mind and feelings, at least so far as such an effect can be produced by allegory. In the " Jurisprudence " the unfavourable position of the window, which leaves but a very small space on one side, ap- pears to have occasioned the division of the space into three separate pictures. In consequence of this the master found it necessary in the upper picture to return to an allegorical mode of representation, which allows the expression of several ideas by means of veiy few figures. ' That this remark is not altogether fanciful, is proved by the many- erroneous interpretations given of the subject in engravings and descriptions immediately after Raphael's death. The authors of these descriptions, it seems, thought they recognized allusions to the Christian religion. See the Beschreibung der Stadt Rom, bd. ii. bu. 1, s. 336. 352 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. II. STANZA OF THE HELIODORUS. The works in this chamber, so called after its principal pic- ture, appear to have directly followed (from the year 1512) the foregoing'. The four divisions of the ceiling correspond to the triangular compartments of the groining, and are formed by a decoration intended to represent figured tapestry. The subjects are from the Old Testament, and include the promises of the Lord to the Patriarchs : in allusion, no doubt, to the power of the Church, and analogous to the ancient Christian symbols — The promise of God to Abraham of a numerous posterity ; ' The Sacrifice of Isaac ; Jacob's Dream ; Moses and the Burning Bush. These are simple, grand compositions, but unfortunately much injured, the colour, and consequently the effect, having suf- fered materially, probably from damp. The four large paint- ings on the wall refer to the Divine assistance granted to the Church against her foes, and the miraculous corroboration of her doctrines ; with a special reference to her relations, eccle- siastical and political, at the period of her foundation. 1. The Expulsion of Heliodorus from the Temple AT Jerusalem : when, as treasurer to the Syrian king Se- leucus, he attempted, by his master's command, to plunder the Temple (2 Maccabees, iii.). This representation com- memorates the deliverance of the ecclesiastical states from the foes of the apostolic authority, under Julius II., and his preservation of the possessions of the Church. In a larger sense it is the symbol of the Divine protection. We look into the nave of the Temple ; in the background is the altar, before which the high-priest kneels in prayer, to avert the threatened danger ; a crowd of people surround him ; agile youths climb on the pedestal of a column in order to see the ceremony. In the foreground, on the right of the spectator, Heliodorus with his servants appears to have been in the act of dragging away the treasures. Heliodorus lies prostrate under the hoofs of a ' [Sometimes called, God appearing to Noah. (See Passavant, Rafael von Urbino, ii. 153.) These four subjects are about to be engraved by Ludwig Grüner. — Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL, 353 horse, on which sits a figure in golden armour : near him two youths sweep forwards to scourge ^vith rods the despoilers of the Temple. This is a group of extraordinary poetic power ; it is like the flash of Divine anger, which strikes the criminal to the earth. Opposite is a dense group of women and chil- dren, beautifully varied in action, their countenances express- ing astonishment and alarm. Next to them is Pope Julius II., borne to the Temple under a canopy. His presence is intended to indicate the relation of the miraculous event to the circum- stances of his time. The picture is a spirited development of an extended action, including within itself both beginning and end ; it admirably represents an animated fleeting moment : the apparent absence of interest and emotion in the group around the Pope alone disturbs this effect ; it were to be wished that these figures could have exhibited a direct sympathy, a more than extrinsic allusion to the event. This picture exhi- bits an inimitable reality and grace in the form and action of the figures ; as a whole it is executed with a grand freedom, dictated by an attention to the general effect, although it is asserted that many parts are not by the master's own hand, 2. The Mass of Bolsena (above and on each side of the window), a representation of a miracle wrought in the year 1263. A priest who doubted the doctrine of transubstantiation was convinced by the blood which flowed from the host he was consecrating. In the last-mentioned picture we see the pro- tection afforded to the Church in her external relations ; in this, her internal security against sceptics and heretics, and the in- fallibility of the Eomish doctrines. It no doubt also contains a reference to the times, to the ferment of mind which pre- ceded the outbreak of the Eeformation. The connection of the miraculous event with the existing persons is contrived in a simple, but very masterly and satisfactory manner. Over the window is an altar in the choir of a church : the priest kneels before it, and regards the bleeding wafer with an ex- pression of embarrassment, astonishment, and shame : behind him are choir-boys with tapers in their hands. On the other side of the altar kneels .Julius II. before his fald-stool, in prayer, his eyes fixed upon the miracle ^\^th a solemn and earnest ex- pression of conviction. At each side of the window is a flight 354 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. of steps : on the left, where the officiating priest is, a great number of people press forwards with varied expressions of wonder: before the steps is a group of women and children, whose attention is thus directed to what is passing. On the other side, behind the Pope, some kneeling cardinals and other prelates express different degrees of sympathy : in front of the steps is a part of the Papal Swiss-guard. This picture is re- markable not only for its excellent, well-connected composition, but for its highly characteristic figures, the courtly submissive- ness of the priests, the rude hardy figures of the Swiss, the various ways in which the people manifest their sympathy, but above all the beautiful naivete of the choir-boys, and of the youths who look over the enclosure of the choir ; all this is connected satisfactorily and naturally with the two principal personages. The colouring of this picture has been greatly extolled, and many have, in this instance, placed Raphael on a level with the masters of the Venetian school ; this opinion, however, is the result of an extreme partiality : ' the colouring is warm, but the execution is frequently coarse, so as almost to look like tapestry, thus already evincing an indifference to higher finish, which from this period becomes more and more visible in the frescos of the Vatican Stanze. Granting that this broader execution may have been the result of the greater freedom to which Raphael had attained in an artistic conception of nature, and that this freedom may, as usual, easily lead to an abuse of acquired powers, yet acci- dental circumstances had also a share in producing the change in question. The attention which Raphael had bestowed on the Stanze during the first years of his residence in Rome was now distributed over various other undertakings. The Mass of Bolsena was finished in 1512 ; in 1513 Julius II. died, and was succeeded in the papal chair by Leo X., a prince who, notwithstanding his finely cultivated taste, appears to have been more inclined to show and splendour on a large scale than to an energetic completion of any single work. Commissions ' [In this judgment the author probably stands alone. High authorities at least are agi-eed in considering this, and indeed all the large paintings in the same Stanza, the finest examples of fresco the art can boast. Titian's frescos at Padua are less richly and effectively coloured than the Mass of Bolsena and the Heliodorus. — Ed."] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 355 of various kinds from this time occupied the youthful master ; the works in the Stanze by degrees fell into the backgroiuid ; much was of necessity left to his scholars, much also in composi- tion was treated even in the beginning with singular negligence. Nevertheless the first three pictures which Raphael executed in these apartments mider Leo X. are among the most impor- tant works of his pencil. Two of them cover the remaining walls of the Stanza of the Heliodorus. 3. Attila, at the head of his army, induced by the warn- ings of Pope Leo I., and the threatening apparition of the apostles Peter and Paul, to desist from his hostile enterprise against Rome. — The subject appears to allude to the expulsion of the French from Italy, which Leo X. had effected by the assistance of the Swiss in the year 1513. The Pope and his train occupy one side of the picture. The Pope's features are those of Leo X., and he as well as his retinue are in the cos- tume of the sixteenth century. Above them appear the two apostles with sAvords in their hands, Attila looks up affrighted at the apparition, while his army, thrown into wild confusion, begins to retreat. In the host of the Hunnish horsemen the movements are powerful, bold, and animated : the papal group is tranquil and unembarrassed ; this tranquillity, it must be confessed, is carried so far that the figures have almost the air of simple portraits. There are great beauties in the exe- cution of this picture, but it is not free from mannerism and weakness. 4. The DELIVERA^'CE of Peter from Prison (above and on each side of a window). — This subject is divided into three parts, each of which contains different moments of the event. Above the window, we see through a grating into the interior of the prison : the angel awakens Peter, who sleeps between his guards. At the right of the window, the angel leads him througli the guards sleeping on the steps. In both these re- presentations, the arrangement of which is extremely beautiful, the figures are illuminated by the beams of light which pro- ceed from the angel. On the left, the guards are awakened : this group receives its light from the moon and from torches. The painting is particularly celebrated for the picturesque effect of these lights. The subject is supposed to contain an allusion 356 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. to the captivity of Leo X., who had been liberated only the year preceding his elevation to the pontificate. III. STANZA DEL INCEXDIO. On the ceiling of this chamber are four round pictures, in which are represented the Almighty and Christ, in different glories. These are the remains of the works of Perugino. The pictures on the walls, executed about 1515, contain events from the lives of Leo III. and IV. They have probably been chosen with reference to the relation by name to Leo X , and correspond to the general plan of the cycle of the Stanze, Avhich, as before mentioned, is dedicated to the glorification of the papal power. The most important are : — L The Fire in the Borgo' (a suburb added to Eome by Leo IV.). — The conflagration was miraculously extinguished by the Pope making the sign of the cross. In the background, we see the portico of the old church of St. Peter's : above it are assembled the Pope and the clergv' ; on the steps of the church, the people who have fled thither for assistance. On each side of the foreground are burning houses. On the left the inha- bitants are flying almost naked, variously intent on securing their own safety, and still more anxious to save those dear to them. On the right men are busied in extinguishing the flames ; women bear vessels of water to them. In the centre a group of women and children crowd anxiously together, and pray to the Pope for succour. A great number of beautiful and noble figures are brought together in this picture, uniting, through one exciting cause, the greatest variety of agitating passions. In this instance the artist was perfectly free, and could give free scope to his feeling for the grand and graceful in form, Anthout any prejudice to the interest of the subject, although, from the manner in which he has conceived it, the chief action is thrown into the distance, and its most prominent meaning is thus lost to the mind. The figures of the two young women who carry vessels of water, with their drapery- tossed in grand folds by the storm,* are verj^ beautiful. In the naked ' [Better known by its Italian denomination, the 'Incendio del Borgo.' — Ed.] * [That no storm is represented appears by the quiet draperies of the AUeAorical personification of CHASITY, in the Sala di Cosumtioo in the Vatican. pa^e 357 Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 357 fig-ui'es, on the contrary, however beautiful in the principal group, there is a manifest endeavour to display a knowledge of form, perhaps from a wish to rival the powerful figures of Michael Angelo. This eflfort in some degree weakens the spectator's interest ; and it must also be admitted that tiie colouring of this part of the picture is very defective, the sha- dows of the flesh being disagreeably black : the assistance of scholars is very apparent throughout the whole work. The other paintings in this apartment are less important as regards their composition. 2. The Victory at Ostia over the Saracens, who had made a descent on Italy in the time of Leo IV. — This fresco is not executed by Raphael. 3. The Oath of Leo III. ; by which he purified himself of the crimes of which his enemies accused him before Charle- magne : (as Pope he could not be judged by any earthly tri- bunal). 4. Charlemagne crowned by Leo III. (temporal power flowing from the spiritual). — This picture contains a great number of excellent portraits, in which we recognise the master's own hand. IV. SALA DI COSTANTINO. The principal paintings in this large flat-roofed apartment are arranged as hanging tapestries ; between them are intro- duced some figures of canonised popes and allegorical female personifications. The large works represent scenes from the life of the Emperor Constantine, in which he figures as the champion of the church and the founder of its temporal power. These works were not executed till after Raphael's death, from his drawings, and under the direction of Giulio Romano. It is said that Raphael intended to use oil colours instead of fresco in this instance, which would have enabled him more easily to correct the work of his scholars. Two of the allego- rical figures, Justice and Benignity, are actually painted in oil ; ' — probably immediately after his death, and from his car- distant figiu-es near the Pope. Raphael probably intended to express the rush of air always observable in the vicinity of a conflagration. — Ed.] ' [See Vasari, Vita di Giulio liomano. — Ed.] 368 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. toons, as we recognise much of his own noble manner, particu- larly in the heads. It does not appear that his drawings were used for any other of the allegorical personifications or figures of popes. At a subsequent period, fresco, which is better adapted for paintings on walls, was again resorted to in the completion of these designs. The principal work of this apartment is the Battle between Constantino and Maxentius at the Ponte Molle near Rome. It was executed by Giulio Komano, after a drawing of Ra- phael's, without any alteration except a few unimportant omis- sions. The design is, therefore, Raphael's own, and it is cer- tainly one of his most important compositions. The moment represented is the crisis of victory : the Aanquished are driven to the banks of the Tiber: the Emperor on horseback, at the head of his army, springs over the bodies of his prostrate foes. Figures of Victory hover over his head. He raises his spear against Maxentius — now driven into the river, and contending ■with the waves in desperation. More distant on the right is seen the last struggle on the shore, and Mith those who endea- vour to save themselves in boats. Still deeper in the picture the fugitives are pursued over the bridge. On the left the battle still rages : here the fury of the victors, the desperate resistance of the last who oppose them, are displayed in various groups. Yet this wild chaos of figures easily resolves itself into separate masses ; the various well-expressed moments of the action guide the eye insensibly to the bright central point. The battle, the victory, the defeat, form a dramatic whole, admirably developed, and calculated to produce the grandest impression when the eye has learned to take in the rich variety of figures. And not less striking is the life, the energj^ of the single forms, and the varied and spirited manner in which they are interwoven with the tragic whole. Älany later artists have made this work their model for representations of the same kind, but none have ever equalled its poetic effect. The execution is bold and clever ; the sharp hard manner of Giulio Romano can hardly be said to injure the effect of this wildly animated scene. The other representations in this apartment are of much less interest, partly because the compositions themselves appear to have been originally less excellent ; partly because ill-advised, Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 359 and even unseemly changes were afterwards made which essen- tially lessened the dignity of the subjects. The first and most important — the Vision of the Holy Cross before the battle (pro- perly the first of the series) — was executed by G. Romano. Tlie second and least successful — the Baptism of Constantine — is ascribed to Francesco Penni. The third — the Gift of Rome to the Pope — is ascribed to RaflPaellino dal Colle. The ceiling is decorated with unimportant paintings of a later date. THE LOGGIE OF THE VATICAX. While the later works in the Stanze were in progress Raphael was employed by Leo X. on two other great under- takings in the department of painting. One was the decora- tion of the Loggie of the Vatican ; the other the designs for the tapestries of the Sistine Chapel. The Loggie are open galleries built round three sides of the court of St. Damasus (tlie older portion of the Vatican Palace). They were begun by Bramante under Julius II., and completed by Raphael under Leo X. They consist of three stories ; the two lower formed by vaulted arcades, the upper by an elegant colonnade. The first arcade of the middle story was decorated with paintings and stuccos under Raphael's direction : it leads to the Stanze, so that one master- work here succeeds to another. If we consider the harmonious combi- nation of architecture, modelling, and painting displayed in these Loggie — all the production of one mind — there is no place in Rome wliich gives so high an idea of the cultivated taste and feeling for beauty which existed in the age of Leo X. The walls round the windows on the inner side of the Loggie are ornamented with festoons of flowers and fruits of great beauty and delicate style. The other paintings, which adorn the walls alternately with small stuccos, represent animals of various kinds, but consist principally in the so-called arabesque or grotesque ornaments. The lightest and most agreeable play of fancy guides the eye, by graceful changes, from one subject to another. It is the embodying of fabulous poetrj^, which connects the strangest forms of fancy -vrith those of vivid reality. The stuccos consist of various architectural 360 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. ornaments and an almost innumerable multitude of reliefs, of small busts, single figures, and groups, which principally re- present mythological subjects (Leo X. was the zealous friend and patron of classical antiquity) : they exhibit a spirited imi- tation of the antique style and in some cases of actually exist- ing monuments. A distinguished scholar of Raphael, in this department of decorative art, Giovanni da Udine, directed the execution of the stuccos and ornaments. Perino del Vaga was the principal assistant of the master in the figures. This kind of decoration was afterwards frequently imitated by several of Raphael's scholars in other places, and has been adopted by modern artists ; wliilst the yet unrivalled originals, less from the effect of time than from barbarism and wantonness, are ma- terially injured, and retain but a faint shadow of their original beauty. The paintings of the vaulted ceiling are on the whole in better preservation ; they are the chief ornaments of the arcade, and the subjects just described form only a graceful frame and accompaniment to them. They represent an extensive cycle of events from Scripture, particularly from the Old Testament, and are known by the name of " Raphael's Bible." There is little by his own hand in these works : the superintendence of them was entrusted to Giulio Romano, and they were painted by him and other scholars from drawings by the master. If they do not exhibit the perfection which is apparent in the works of Raphael's own hand, the greater number belong to his happiest compositions, to those of his productions in which his peculiar talent is most happily displayed. The patriarchal simplicity of tlie histories of the Old Testament, a simplicity so nearly allied to that of classical antiquity, affords materials well adapted to representations of life in its primaeval serenity and circumscribed relations ; to the development of expres- sion, undisturbed by vague and unsatisfied longings ; to the creation of noble forms animated by harmonious feelings. The contemplation of these figures, like pure harmony in music, fully satisfies the mind by excluding every thought of an ulterior change. A few only of the series are of inferior merit in composition. Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 361 The roof of this Loggia is formed by thirteen small cupolas, each containing four pictures in a different frame- work ; there are fifty-two in the whole : the single cupolas always embrace a series of connected subjects. The following is a list of those in the cupolas, with the names of the scholars of Eaphael to whom the execution is ascribed : 1. The Creation. — Giulio Romano. — The figures of the Almighty are after the type defined by Michael Angelo in the roof of the Sistine Chapel, but they do not attain the grandeur of the original. 2. History of Adam and Eve. — Giulio Romano. — The figure of Eve in the subject of the Fall is probably painted by Raphael himself. The Expulsion is an imitation and im- provement of Masaccio's, in the Brancacei Chapel at Florence. 3. Subjects from the History of Noah. — Giulio Romano. 4. Subjects from the History of Abraham and Lot. — Fran- cesco Penni. 5. from the History of Isaac. — Francesco Penni. 6. of Jacob. — Pellegrino da Modena. 7. of Joseph. — Giulio Romano. 8. of Moses. — Perino del Vaga, or G. Romano. 9. of Moses. — Raffaellino dal Colle. 10. of Joshua. — Perino del Vaga. 1 1 . ■ of David. — Perino del Vaga. 12. of Solomon. ^ — Pellegrino da Modena. 1 3. from the New 'J'estament. — Perino del Vaga, or Giulio Romano.' For the second and third arcades of the same story the New ' [Thus, one cupola alone contains subjects from the New Testament, originally concluding the series. The subjects of this cupola are, the Adoration of the Shepherds and the Adoration of the Kings (the Gospel preached to rich and poor), and the two essential Sacraments of Baptism and the Lord's Supper. The author has well explained the general purport of the frescos of the Stanze, beginning with the establishment of the Church under Constan- tine, and gradually exhibiting its powers and privileges according to the faith of Rome. The third room, containing the subjects of Theology, Poetry, Philosophy, and Jurisprudence, does not so directly belong to this general scheme, and this is explained by the fact of its having been the first planned, when the remaining rooms had been already in part decorated by Pietro della Francesca, Signorelli, and other painters : it was therefore intended to be complete in itself. The works of these painters having been removed, and a fuller scope thus offered to Raphael, he then for the first time appears to have conceived the comiected cycle which has been described. — Ed.] R 362 MASTEKS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEXTURY. Book V. Testament subjects are continued and completed by unimportant artists of a later periotl. THE TAPESTRIES.' In the years 1513 and 1514* Raphael executed designs for the ten tapestries which were intended to adorn the Sistine Chapel. They represent events from the lives of the Apostles, and are some of Raphael's most important producticjns. They display not only great dignity and grandeur of form, a most intelligible and harmonious arrangement of the groups, but also such depth and power of thought, such a surprising dra- matic development of each event, that historical representation here appears to have attained its highest triumph. A parti- cular attention appears to have been given to the material to be employed, and many decorations are happily introduced which are calculated to produce a beautiful effect in tapestry. Raphael furnished large cartoons in distemper colours, which were either executed by himself or under his immediate direc- tion, chiefly by Francesco Penni.^ Seven of these cartoons are preserved in the Palace of Hampton Court, in England. The tapestries themselves are kept in some I'ooms of the Vatican. They were worked from the cartoons, at Arras in Flanders, and hence were called " Arazzi." It is said that the execution was superintended by Bernhard van Orley, a Flemish artist formed in the school of Raphael. They are very masterly in execution, particularly in the flowing, elastic treatment of the forms, and must excite greater admiration when we consider the difficulties of the execution. Alas ! they are not only injured in manj^ parts and badly restored, but they have faded so much that the general effect of the colouring is destroyed. According to their original destina- tion they form two series ; the first comprehending the earlier ' See W. Gunn, ' Cartonensia, or an Historical and Critical Account of the Tapestries in the Palace of the Vatican/ London, 1831. See also Waagen, England, vol. i. p. 361-382. ■> ^ According to common belief these were not completed till 1516. Waagen, however, for many reasons, supposes them to have been completed at the date we have given above. According to Gaye's calculation, C'artegg. 2, 222, the tapestries themselves were partially completed, and arrived in Kome as early as 1518. 3 [See Vasari, Vita di Francesco il Fattore. — Ed.] Cliap. IV. RAPHAEL. 363 history of the Christian church, in which St. Peter is the principal personage ; the second consisting of events from the ministry of St. Paul. The following are the different sub- jects : — First Series. 1. The Miraculous Draught of Fishes. — A composi- tion of remarkable serenity and repose. The scene represents the sea of Gennesaret, with a view of the distant shore : in front are two boats Avith three figures in each ; in one boat they are employed in hauling in a net with great eifort ; in the other, which seems sinking with the weight of the fish, Peter kneels before Christ. The two boats are placed in one line and close to one another, which produces a singular effect, as if the figures were slowly passing before the eye of the spec- tator. Three herons, standing at the water's edge, stretch up their long necks. This cartoon appears to have been painted almost entirely by Raphael's own hand, as a model perhaps for the others ; the keeping is remarkably well observed, the drawing excellent, the colouring clear and deep in tone. It is supposed that the fish and the herons are by Giovanni da Udine. 2. The Delivery of the Keys to Peter. — The Dis- ciples, to whom our Lord appears at the sea of Tiberias after his resurrection, are here assembled. Peter kneels before Christ with the keys in his hand ; Christ points with one hand to the keys, Avith the other to a flock of sheep, in the middle distance, as emblematic of his own words, " Feed my sheep." The Saviour is a dignified figure, the expression and move- ments of the apostles excellent : .John is represented in an attitude of adoring reverence ; the others express astonishment in various ways. 3. The Healing of the Lame Man. — The scene is the portico of the Temple, with several rows of richly-ornamented tNvisted columns, by which the picture is divided into three groups. In the centre the miracle is performed by Peter and John. Among the surrounding people are several verj^ grace- ful women and beautiful children. The whole gives an im- pression of festive splendour. 4. The Death of Ananias. — A composition exhibiting b2 364 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEXTURY. Book V. a masterly development of the event. In the centre is a tribune on which the apostles are assembled : on one side several people deliver in their property (according to the established community of goods) ; among them a woman care- fully counts over her money, instead of giving it in with con- fidence — undoubtedly the wife of Ananias. On the other side, several poor people receive assistance from tlie common fund. In the foreground Ananias has fallen in convulsions to the ground, as a punishment for his falsehood : those who are beside him start back affrighted. Peter and James (who in- voke the wrath of Heaven on Ananias) are figures of grand apostolic majesty. 5. The Stoning of Stephen, — The figure of tlie saint is particularly excellent. Kneeling, he raises his eyes to heaven (where the Saviour appears with the Eternal Father and angels), and prays to God for forgiveness for his murderers. In the foregrovind Saul holds the clothes of the witnesses. This cartoon has disappeared. Second Series. 1. The Conversion of St. Paul. — Paul lies on the ground, thrown from his horse ; above him appears the threat- ening figure of the Saviour : Paul alone sees it ; his armed followers witness the awfulness of the Divine presence only in its effects. The expression of fear and consternation is admi- rably portrayed. The cartoon is lost. 2. The Punishment of the Sorcerer Elymas. — The proconsul, Sergius, is seated on his throne, in the centre of the picture, with lictors, etc., at his side. In front and on the right of the spectator, Paul stretches his aim toward tlie sorcerer with calm dignity ; the latter stands on the left : a sudden darkness has come upon liim ; he moves with uncertain steps and open mouth, feeling his way with outstretched arms. The sudden fate of the impostor is expressed in this instance with the game mastery as in that of the Ananias. Consterna- tion and wonder are visible in the bystanders : the proconsul turns angi'ily toward his learned men, who stand embarrassed behind the sorcerer. (Only the upper half of the tapestry from this cartoon exists.) THE STONING OF ST. STEPHEN ; a tapestry of the Sistine series, in the Vat-.can. pa^e 3Ö4. Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 365 3. Paul and Barnabas at Lystra, — A festal proces- sion, with a victim (the whole imitated from an antique bas- relief), approaches, to offer sacrifice to Paul before the steps of a temple. On one side, at the head of the procession, a man cured of lameness has thrown down his crutches and turns gratefully to Paul, who, standing on the opposite side, rends his garment in indignation at the error of the heathen. A youth, who observes the gestures of the apostle, endeavours to stop the sacrificer. In the festal pomp of this representation tlie cause and the result of the incident are admirably united. 4. The Preaching of Paul at Athens. — Paul stands on the steps of a building and addresses the people, who stand before him in a half-circle. His figure is very dignified : both arms are raised to heaven with an expression of earnest elo- quence. (We here recognise the same figure of St. Paul in Masaccio's picture of Peter in Prison.') The effect on the auditors is very varied. The different philosophical sects, of stoics, epicureans, and others, are easily distinguished. The sophists dispute ; others stand in doubt, or easy indifference, looking on, or lost in thought ; others, full of faith, are pene- trated with the truth. 5. Paul in the Prison of Philifpi, at the time of the earthquake. — The earthquake is personified by a giant, who has torn an opening in the earth. Behind the grate of the prison the apostle is seen in prayer ; in front are the guards. (A very small tapestry : the cartoon does not exist.) The borders round these works are enriched with ornaments corresponding in style with those in the Loggie. The lateral divisions or pilasters are ornamented with graceful figures in the arabesque taste, generally mythological in their allusions, and in the natural colours. Under the large subjects are small compositions in the style of friezes, painted in bronze colour. Those under the second series are scenes from the liistory of the apostles, so connected with the subjects of the chief pictures, as to carry on and unite the separate events. Those vmder the first series represent incidents from the early history of Leo, in the style of antique reliefs ; and although [' The subject referred to, according to the author himself, is by Filippino Lippi ; seep. 194. — Ed.] 366 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEEN^TH CENTURY. Book V. the costume of the time is retained in the principal portraits, it is so manag-ed as to liarmonize with this classic treatment. Both series give an additional proof of Raphael's all-pervading taste and feeling for beauty, M'hich enabled him to give even to the least important subjects the impress of his own noble mind.' In the same apartments of the Vatican there is another series of tapestries, also designed by Raphael. They are twelve in number,* higher in shape, and without the orna- mental accessories. They represent scenes from the life of Christ, and were certainly executed after the others. The circumstance of their being called by the keepers of the Vatican, " Arazzi della scuola nuova," as distinguished from the first described, called " Arazzi della scuola vecchia," seems to confirm this. It does not appear probable that the cartoons for these last-mentioned tapestries were executed under Raphael's immediate direction, since, in the greater number, the drawing is much less satisfactory than in the other series. We observe also some elements foreign to his school, of a Flemish character, which makes it probable that a part at least were executed by Flemish artists, such as Bern- hard van Orley and others. Nevertheless, the general inven- tion, composition, and style of these works announce, for the most part, the unquestionable genius of Raphael, — the same grace and dignity which we recognize in all his pi'oductions ; though occasional compositions bear a very conventional cha- racter, and show decided marks of change of purpose. Acces- sories and landscape appear throughout to be of Netherlandish invention. It is believed that Francis I., on the occasion of the canonization of S. Francesco di Paolo, in 1519, promised the Pope these tapestries, and commissioned Raphael to make the designs for them. It is not probable, however, that they were executed before 1523. Among the finest works of the second series may be parti- cularly mentioned, first, the Adoration of the Kings, a large • [See the note at the end of this cliapter, on the original situation of the tapestries. — IiId.] ^ [A thirteenth, with allegorical figures alluding to the papal power, com- pletes the series. See Passavant, Rafael von Urbino, ii. 260. — Ed.] THE ASCENSION ; a tapestry of the later series, in the Vatican. pa^e 366. ^-"--.,, APOSTLES, designed by Raphael and engraved by Marc Antonio. page 367. ^fi)'yu»,^,,_ ^^^W:,,,,^ APOSTLES, designed by Raphael and engraved by Hare Antonio. page 367. \ -v C^.^ ^ ■ Ja ^^ t^^ü£=:-frÄ>:' Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 367 composition, full of figures. The numerous and splendid retinue of the Kings is assembled with joyous awe and adora- tion around the principal group. And secondly, the Resur- rection of Christ, of similar size and richness of character. The figure of the triumphant Saviour forms the chief centre, while the utmost life and variety of agitation are seen in the ranks of the guards who flee in terror, or fling themselves on the earth. Thirdly, three narrow tapestries containing the Murder of the Innocents, each in itself an independent and finely-conceived picture of this rich and varied subject — all alike characterized by that pure spirit of beauty which so treated the most painful incidents as to excite the profound sympathy of the spectator, instead of appalling him with scenes of terror, as usual with all previous conceptions of these scenes. (A fourth and larger composition of the Murder of the Innocents, where Raphael has imparted the same moral tenderness, the same exquisite charm to the figures of the despairing and fleeing mothers, was engraved from a drawing of the master by his scholar Marc Antonio.) After the completion of the tapestries for Leo X., owing to the great applause which these splendid articles of luxury met with, repetitions were executed for many other places, and thus various copies are to be seen in Dresden, Mantua, P2ngland, France, and elsewhere.' We conclude with the figures of the twelve Apostles, exe- cuted in chiaroscuro after Raphael's designs, in an apartment of the Vatican, since altered. These are probably the com- positions engraved by Älarc Antonio, and painted by Raphael's scholars on the pilasters of St. Vincenzo alle Tre Fontane (near Rome), where they are now to be seen. They are dig- nified, well-draped figures, but deficient in real grandeur. Finally, in the last years of his life (1518-1520), Raphael completed the decorations of the chapel of the little castle of La Magliana — a favourite residence of Leo X., five miles ' See Passavant, vol. ii. p. 273, for an account of these frequent, and in part contemporary, repetitions. Nine pieces of the first series, of which only " Paul in the Prison at Philippi " was wanting, were long in England, and have only been recently purchased for the Berlin Museum. They are said to have been in the possession of Henry VIII., and to have come to England at that time from Italy. 368 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. from Rome, near Porta Portese. Here, under Julius II., a scholar of Perugino's, probably Spagna, had painted the Annunciation and the Visitation^ — Raphael now added, either by his own hand, or by that of one of his best scholars, the Martyrdom of St. Felicitas, a composition, the excellence of which is now only fully preserved in Marc Antonio's engraving, the centre and principal scene having been destroyed not long ago by the barbarous introduction of a window. On the left, still preserved, is a group of men surrounding the tyrant, who are eagerly watching the scene, and on the right the figure of an idol with three terrified women with a naked boy, who is clinging fearfully to them. Tlie heads are all of the finest expression. In a Glory of the First Person of the Trinity, probably by one of Raphael's scholars, one of the angels strewing flowers is closely imitated * from the celebrated Ma- donna of Francis I., 1518, which is described further on. Beside all these important commissions, executed by Raphael for the Papal Court, during twelve years, many claims were made on him by private persons. Among the works of this kind may be mentioned two frescos executed for Roman churches. One in S'" Maria della Pace, over the arch of the first side-chapel, on the right of the entrance ; it represents four Sibyls surrounded by angels. It is one of Raphael's most perfect works : great mastery is shown in the mode of filling and taking advantage of the apparently unfavourable space. The angels who hold the tablets to be written on, or read by the sibyls, create a spirited variety in the severe sym- metrical arrangement of the whole. Grace in the attitudes and movements, with a peculiar harmony of form and colour, pervade the whole picture ; but important restorations have unfortunately become necessary in several parts. An inte- resting comparison may be instituted between this work and the Sibyls of Michael Angelo. In each we find the peculiar excellence of the two great masters ; for while Michael Angelo's figures are grand, sublime, profound, the fresco of ' See Passavant, vol. i. p. 290, and vol. ii. p. 340; also an article by Herrn H. Hase, in the 'Blätter für literarische Unterhaltung,' Leipzig, Brockhaus, 1841, Nos. 235 and 236. [Engraved by L. Gniner, "I Freschi della Villa Magliana di Pvafl'aelle d' ürbino, &c., Loiidra, 1847.— Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL, 369 the Pace bears the impress of Raphael's serene and ingenuous grace. The four Prophets on the wall over the Sibyls were executed by Timoteo della Vite, after drawings by Raphael. In a second fresco, representing the prophet Isaiah and two angels, who hold a tablet, painted on a pilaster in the church of S. Agostino at Rome, the comparison is unfavourable to Rapliael. An effort to rival the powerful style of Michael Angelo is very visible in this picture ; an effort wliicli, not- withstanding the excellence of the execution in parts, has produced only an exaggerated and affected figure.' While drawing these comparisons between Michael Angelo and Raphael, we may mention a small oil picture, supposed to have been executed by Raphael as early as lolO, but which, to judge from its affinity with the earlier pictures of the Loggie, can only liave been produced in 1513 : it represents the Vision of Ezekiel, and is now in the Pitti Palace at Florence; it contains the First Person of the Trinity, in a glory of brightly illuminated cherubs' heads, his outstretched arms supported by two genii, and resting on the mystical forms of the ox, eagle, and lion ; the angel is introduced adoring beside tliem. Dignity, majesty, and sublimity are here blended ynXh. inex- pressible beauty : the contrast between the figure of the Al- mighty and the two youthful genii is admirably portrayed, and the whole composition so clearly de-\'eloped, that it is un- doubtedly one of the master- works of the artist. Michael Angelo, who had also given a type of the Almighty, represents him borne upon the storm ; Raphael represents him as if irradiated by the splendour of the sun :- — here again both masters are supremely great, similar yet different, and neither greater than the other. A copy of this work, formerly iu the ' Sebastian del Piombo's accouut of his remarkable audience of Julius I J., published in Gaye's Cartegg., ii. p. 477, proves that Jlichael Angelo's in- fluence over Piaphael was well known at that time, 1512. If Sebastian is to be believed, the Pope expressed liimself thus : — " Look at the works of Raphael ! As soon as he saw those of Michael Angelo, he instantly (subito'') quitted the style of Perugino. and adapted himself (nccostava) as nearly as possible to that of Michael Angelo." Gaye connects this change with Michael Angelo's cartoon at Florence ; but the Florentine works of Kaphael testify so little of that master's influence, that we should far rather attribute it to the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, of which at least a portion was open to the public in 1509. R 3 370 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Orleans Gallery, and at one time considered the original, is now at Stratton, in England. A somewhat later work of Raphael also proves that in the very same subjects in which Michael Angelo's whole greatness was displayed he infused that free and peculiar beauty which places them in the noblest contrast to the gigantic power of his rival. We allude to the decorations of the Chigi chapel at S. Maria del Popolo at Rome. Here it was intended that the cupola should contain the history of the Creation up to the Fall, tliat four statues of the prophets should represent the Promise, and three large wall pictures the fulfilment of the New Covenant. With the exception of tlie statue of the prophet Jonah, which Raphael appears to have executed him- self, he only lived to see the completion of the mosaics in the cupola after his designs, by Luigi da Pace (Maestro Luisaccio) in 1516.' In the centre circle is the Almighty, with up- lifted arms, in the act of creation, surrounded by seraphim. Around, in eight compartments, are the mythological half- length figures of seven planets, and a cherub as head of the planetary system. Furtlier below are the signs of the zodiac, and, leaning or sitting upon them, figures of angels of such wonderful and simple beauty as we can only compare to the sibyls in S. Maria della Pace. Unfortunately the whole has been much injured. Like all other artists, Raphael is always greatest when, undisturbed by foreign influence, he follows tlie free, original impulse of his own mind. His peculiar element was grace and beauty of form, in as far as these are the expression of high moral purity. Hence, notwithstanding the grand works in which he was employed by the Popes, his peculiar powers are most fully developed in the Madonnas and Holy Families, of which he has left so great a number. In his youth he seems to have been fondest of this class of subjects, and if his earliest works of this kmd bear the impress of a dreamy, sentimental fancy, and the later ones of a cheerful conception of life, the works of his third period form the happiest medium ' See ' I Musaici della Cupola nella Cappella Chigiana di S. M. del Popolo in Roma, inv. da Rafucle Sauzio, inc. ed ed. da L. Gruaer, illustr. da Ant. Grifi,' Roma, 1839. Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 371 between cheerfulness and dignity, — between innocent play- fulness and a deep penetration of the spirit of his subject. They are conceived with a graceful freedom^ so delicately controlled, that it appears always guided by the finest feeling for the laws of art. They place before us tliose dearest rela- tions of life which form the foundation of morality, the closest ties of family love ; yet they seem to breathe a feeling still higher and holier. Mary is not only the affectionate mother ; she appears, at the same time, with an expression of almost virgin timidity, and yet as the blessed one of whom the Lord was born. The infant Christ is not only the cheerful innocent child, but a prophetic seriousness rests on his features, which tells of his future sacred destiny. In the numerous representations of these subjects, varying in the number, attitude, and grouping of the figures, there prevails some- times a more simply natural, sometimes a more profound conception ; they thus offer many interesting points of com- parison. They are not all, however, from Raphael's own hand ; many, though painted from liis designs and in his studio, have only been retouched and completed by himself: many also which bear his name are but the works of his scholars, who endeavoured to seize and appropriate some portion of the master-spirit. Among these works we may particularly distinguish those of the earlier part of Kaphael's residence in Rome. These, as might be expected from his more severe employments, are simple compositions, of not very considerable size. The exe- cution, however, sliows that they are done quite con amove, and they more or less retain the traces of that deep earnestness which, we have observed, characterized his youthful works. The following are especially deserving of mention. The Aldobrandini Madonna (27), now in the possession of Lord Garvagh. — The Madonna, sitting on a bench, bends tenderly towards the little St. John, her left arm round him ; he reaches up playfully for a flower, gracefully offered to him by the infant Christ, who sits on his mother's lap. Behind the Madonna is the pilaster of an arcade, and on each side a view into the landscape beyond : the whole forms a composi- tion of the greatest beauty and sweetness. The picture is in 372 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. good preservation. An old repetition of the same subject is at Signor Camuccini's in Rome.' The Madonna of the Duke of Alba (26), formerly in the possession of Mr. Coesvelt, in London, now in the Hermitage at St. Petersburg. — The INIadonna, a full-length figure, is seated in a quiet landscape-scene ; the child on her lap ; she holds a book in her hand, which she has been just reading ; the little St. John kneels before his divine companion with infantine grace and offers him a cross, which he receives with looks of unutterable love : the Madonna's eyes are directed to the prophetic play of the children with a deep, earnest expres- sion. It is a beautiful picture, executed in the best and most delicate style by the master's own hand, and very well pre- served. La Vierge an Diademe (28), also called La Vierge au Linge, in the Louvre. — The Madonna is seated in a kneeling position, lifting the veil from the sleeping Child, in order to show it to the little St. John, who is kneeling in joyful adoration. In the background a rich landscape. The execu- tion decidedly does not belong entirely to Raphael. The picture also, like so many in the Louvre, has been much injured. Similar compositions, with a more or less free imita- tion of this moment, are frequent.^ The Madonna and Child (31), in the possession of Mr. Rogers in London (from the Orleans gallery). — The Madonna, a half-length figure, youthful and noble, is seen behind a balustrade or low wall, on which stands the Child, who, smiling, nestles close to her, holding her round the neck. The picture has now lost its surface, and is interesting in a technical point of view, on account of the bright reddish undertint which is apparent. The Madonna (half-figure) and Cliild (30), in the pos- session of Lord Ellesmere, and forming part of the Bridge- water gallery at London (from the Orleans gallery, and not in a good state). — The Child is stretched on her lap ; she ' [The picture here alluded to is small; it contains but two figures, and is quite different in composition : see p. 339. — Ed.] * Representations of this kind, with the child sleeping, are generally called ' Silentium,' ' Vierge au Silence,' &ic. r-E MADONNAS OF RAPHAEL. -V, C- \ "iC: -"■ y t>/; ^! ^-JsÄ/ V ^UI 21. l,a Belle Jenrliniere, Louvre, L. 106, P. 86, p. 338. 22. Del Baldacctuno, Florence, L. 110, P. 99, p. 340. 53. With the Lamb, Escurial, P. 91, p. 340. ■M. Wendelstadt, P. 92. 25. Loreto, L. 148, P. 126, p. 373. 26. Casa d'Alba, St. Petersburg, P. 12S, p. 372. 27. Garva^h. London, P. 131, p. 371. 28. Diademe, Louvre, L. lOS, P. 133, p. 372. 29. Madormadi Fuli^no, Rome, L. 443, P. 134, p. 3T 30. Bridgewater, Loudon, L. 145, P. 144, p. 373. 31. Bogers, London, L. 325, P. 146, p. 372. 32. Diriu' Amore, Naples, L. 294, P. 147, p. 37.'i. 33. Del Pesce, Escurial, L. 295, P. ISO, p. 378. 31. DelLi Sedia, Florence, L. 109, P. 294, p. 373. 35. DeUa Tenda, Monicb, P. 297, p. 373. THB MADONNAS OF RAPHAEL. ^ i 39. Under the Oak, Madrid, P. 301, p. 375. 43. Madonna del Passe^gio, London, L. lOJ, P. 397. 37. The Pearl, Madrid, L. 143, P. 306, p. 375 p. 374. 33. Of Francis I., Louvre, L. 105, P. 312, p. 376. 44. Candelabra, London, P. 399, p. 374. 39. Small Holy Family, Louvre, L. 107, P. 375, p. 375. 45. Madonna among Ruins, L. 425, P. 401. 40. Di San Sisto, Dresden, P. 338, p. 379. 46. "Ecce Agnus Dei," London, P. 403. p. 376, eee L. 147. 41. Dell' Impannata, Florence, L. 436, P. 391, p. 374. 47. Delia Gatta, Naples, P. 3C8, p. 375. 12. Ripoao, Vienna, L. 328, P. 395, p. 376. 49. » Raphael, in the Tribune at Florence, P. 407. Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 373 looks at him with maternal joy. The infant, in gracefnl and lively action, turns his little head upwards, and looks at her as if in deep thought, yet tenderly (painted 1512). Several old repetitions are in the JMuseums of Berlin, Naples, &c. Madonna di Loreto (25). — The original is lost, but the subject is known from numerous old copies ; for instance, in the Louvre, in the Studj gallery at Naples, in the collection of the Prince of Salerno also at Naples, in Mr. Miles's col- lection at Leigh-court, in Mr. Wigram's, &c. The Virgin is lifting the veil from the just awakening Child. Joseph stands at her side, devoutly looking on. Half-length figures the size of life ; generally a green curtain in the background.' The Madonna della Sedia (34), in the Pitti Palace at Florence (painted about 1516), a circular picture. — Tlie Madonna, seen in a side view, sits on a low chair holding the Child on her knee ; he leans on her bosom in a listless, child- like attitude : at her side John folds his little hands in prayer. The Madonna wears a many-coloured handkerchief on her shoulders, and another on her head, in the manner of the Italian women. She appears as a beautiful and blooming woman, looking out of the picture in the tranquil enjoyment of maternal love ; the Child, full and strong in form, has a serious, ingenuous, and grand expression. The colouring is uncommonly warm and beautiful. The Madonna della Tenda (35), in the possession of the King of Bavaria. (There is a repetition of the picture in the Royal gallery of Turin, also said to be an original.) — A composition similar to the last, except that the Child is repre- sented in more lively action, and looking upwards. In the background is a curtain, hence the name of the Italian picture. A series of similar, but in some instances more copious compositions, belong to a later period ; they are in a great measure the work of his scholars, painted after his draw- ings, and only partially touched upon by Eaphael himself. Indeed many pictures of this class should, perhaps, be con- sidered altogether as the productions of his scliool, at a time ' Passavant, vol. ii. p. 126, assigns this composition to Raphae/s earlier Roman time — on which account we place it here, though it appears to us to belong to his latest and freest time. 374 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V, when that school was under his direct superintendence, and when it wa.« enabled to imitate his finer cliaracteristics in a remarkable degree. In this class we must include the Vierge aux Candelabres (44), where the Madonna is seated, with au angel bearing a torch on each side. This circular j)icture was sold in England by the Duke of Lucca, with other treasures of art, in 1840.' The Madonna dell' Impannata (41), in the Pitti palace at Florence, shows only the technical stamp of his scliool. The two holy women who pay homage to the Child are very beau- tiful ; the little St. John, on the contrary, who sits in the foreground, and points to Christ, wants the easy naivete of Raphael. The Child is, however, softly and delicately painted ; and here, it is probable, the master himself assisted. This picture, which is armnged more as an altarpiece than Raphael's other Holy Families, takes its name from the oiled-paper window in the background. The Madonna del Passeggio (43), in the Bridgewater gallery, formerly in the Orleans gallery, and yet earlier in that of Christina of Sweden, appears to have been painted by Francesco Penni. It represents the Madonna and Child walk- ino" in a landscape, and the little St. John about to kiss his playfellow. The children are peculiarly graceful, almost in Raphael's Florentine manner ; but the draper}^ of the Madonna is heav)', and resembles the works of later artists. There are several repetitions in the Museum of Naples and elsewhere. In all these Holy Families of Raphael's later period, Avhat- ever part he may or may not have taken in their execution, there appears a pervading character of grand ideal beauty, which, as before remarked, is common to the other works of art of tills age. We no longer perceive the tender enthusiasm, the earnestness and fervour of youth ; but, in their stead, a cheerful, tranquil enjoyment of life, ennobled by the purest feeling. They are not, however, glorified, holy forms, which impel us to adore ; they rather show us the most interesting moments of domestic life, the accidental re-unions in a family, when the sports of graceful children attract the delighted ' [Now in the possession of Mr. Munro. — Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 375 observation of parents. The greater number of these pictures consist of four figures — the Madonna, the two Children, and either Elizabeth or Joseph. Among those pictures in which Elizabeth shares the motlier's joy, are the following. The Holy Family, known by the name of " the Pearl " (37), in the gallery at Madrid : the most important, and, in composition, unquestionably the finest of Raphael's Holy Families. The figures, arranged in perfect harmony, form a beautiful group : — the infant Christ sits on the Madonna's knee, resting one foot on a cradle, in the foreground ; John brings fruits in his panther's skin. Pliilip lY. of Spain, who had purchased the picture from the gallery of Charles I., is said to have exclaimed on seeing it, " This is mj^ pearl !" — hence its name. Giulio Romano probably assisted much in the execution. A small Holy Family in the Louvre (39). The infant Christ stands on a cradle caressing St. John. The execu- tion is attributed sometimes to Giulio Romano, sometimes to Garofalo. The so-called Madonna col divino amore (32), in the Museum of Naples.' The Child, seated on the Virgin's lap, is blessing the Baptist, while Elizabeth supports his little arm. The execution is attributed by some to Giulio Romano, but it betrays more of Raphael's own hand than most of his later works. The Madonna della Gatta (47), in the Museum at Naples, may also be mentioned here. It was executed by Giulio liomano after Raphael's " Perla." It is a beautiful domestic scene, and excellently composed ; but the scholar's different mind shows itself in the prominence of the accessories, in the more violent action of the Child, in the incomparably less depth and purity of expression, and in the heavy, dark shadows. Among the pictures in which Joseph completes the group, are several in the Museum at Madrid, particularly La Äladonna della Lucertola (36), so called because a lizard- is introduced ' According to Passavant, vol. i. p. 187, painted as early as 1512, which we are much inclined to doubt. * [No lizard appears in the original picture at IMadrid, though one is intro- duced in the copy in the Pitti Palace : hence the " Holy Family under the oak " is the better appellation. — Ed.] 376 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. in the picture ; also " the Holy Family under the oak," painted about 1517. Joseph leans on an antique architectural ruin ; the young Christ turns to John, who holds up to him a strip of parchment with the words " Ecce agnus Dei !" The exe- cution is attributed to Giulio Romano, A repetition, marked as a copy by Giulio Romano, is in the Pitti Palace at Florence. It is hard and cold. A composition, in which the children hold a similar piece of parchment with upraised hands, appears to have been frequently repeated by Raphael's scholars. One of them is at Stratton, the seat of Sir Thomas Earing ; another is in the possession of Mr. Munro, in London (46), formerly in that of M. Nieuwenhuys ; a third in the sacristy of the Escurial. A Repose in Egypt (42) is in the Imperial gallery at Vienna. The Madonna kneeling, holds the Child in her arms ; John also kneels, and presents fruits : Joseph, leading an ass by the bridle, is in the act of raising John. The picture is freely and boldly painted. The Child is extremely beautiful, as is also the head of John. Lastly, the large picture of a Holy Family (38), in the Louvre, painted by Raphael in 1518 for Francis I., is pecu- liarly excellent. The Madonna kneels to take up the Child, who springs joyfully out of the cradle ; Elizabeth kneels also and folds the hands of the little St. John ; Joseph, in the background, is in calm contemplation. At the side are two angels : one strews floAvers over the Child, the other crosses his hands on his breast. The whole has a character of cheer- fulness and joy : an ea.sy and delicate play of graceful lines and the noblest forms, w^hich unite in an intelligible and harmonious whole. Giulio Romano assisted in the execu- tion. To this cycle of Holy Families may be added the Visitation (of Mary to Elizabeth), now in Spain. The heads are very beautiful — Mary's full of the most graceful innocence and humility. On the other hand, the drawing of the draperies and figures appears to be less excellent. Chiefly executed by Giulio Romano. A similar character pervades the larger compositions of this later period, which represent the Madonna as queen Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. of heaven, thougli their destination as altarpieces naturally causes the religious character to predominate. AVith regard to these compositions, in whicli several Saints are assembled round the Madonna, it is to be observed, that although these holy person;) ges were brouglit together arbitrarily (for various accidental reasons), yet Raphael has contrived to place them in reciprocal relation to each other, and to establish a con- nexion between them ; while the earlier masters either ranged them next to one another, in simple synmietrical repose, or with equal caprice disposed them in all kinds of attitudes, with a view to picturesque effect. Raphael has left three large altar-pictures of this kind, which are interesting examples of his various conceptions of the Madonna. Of these the Madonna di Fuligno (29) (also called La Vierge au Donataire), in the Vatican, is the earliest, and of about the same date as the Stanza della Segnatura, namely, about 1511. It was originally ordered for the church of Ara Coeli in Rome, by one of the court of Julius II., Gismondo Conti, but was afterwards transferred to Fuligno : hence its name. In the upper part of the picture is the Madonna with the Child, enthroned on the clouds in a glory, surrounded by angels. Underneath, on one side, kneels the donor, raising his folded hands to the Virgin ; behind him stands St. Jerome, who recommends him to her care. On the other side is St. Francis, also kneeling and looking upward, while he points with one hand out of the picture to the people, for whom he entreats the protection of the Mother of Grace ; behind liim is John the Baptist, who points to the Madonna, while he looks at tlie spectator as if inviting the latter to pay her homage. The relation between the picture and the com- munity of believers, expressed by the last two figures, appears from this time variously modified in the altarpieces of the Catholic church. Between the two groups stands an angel holding a tablet, intended for an inscription. In the distance is a city, on which falls a meteor, or perhaps a bomb-shell ; above it is a rainbow, no doubt in allusion to some danger and miraculous preservation, in remembrance of which the picture was dedicated.' ' [Providential escapes, victories, and successes were among the most 378 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. This work, however beautiful in the whole arrangement, however excellent in the execution of separate parts, appears to belong only to a transition-state of development. There is something of the ecstatic enthusiasm which has produced such peculiar conceptions and treatment of religious subjects in other artists — Correggio, for example — and which, so far from harmonizing with the unaffected, serene grace of Raphael, has in this instance led to some serious defects. This remark is particularly applicable to the figures of St. John and St. Francis : the former looks out of the picture with a fantastic action, and the drawing of his arm is even considerably man- nered. St. Francis has an expression of fanatical ecstasy, and his countenance is strikingly weak in the painting (composed of reddish, yellowish and grey tones, which cannot be wholly ascribed to the restorer). Again, St. Jerome looks up with a sort of fretful expression, in which it is difficult to recognize, as some do, a mournful resignation ; there is also an exagge- rated style of drawing in the eyes, which sometimes gives a .sharpness to the expression of Raphael's figures, and appears very marked in some of his other pictures. Lastly, the Madonna and the Child, who turn to the donor, are in atti- tudes which, however graceful, are not perhaps sufficiently tranquil for the majesty of the queen of heaven.' The expres- .sion of the Madonna's countenance is extremely sweet, but with more of the character of a mere woman than of a glorified being. The figure of the donor, on the other hand, is excel- lent, with an expression of sincerity and truth ; the angel with the tablet is of unspeakable intensity and exquisite beauty — one of the most marvellous figures that Raphael has created. The second of these pictures, the Madonna del Pesce (33), frequent occasions of what are called votive pictures. In these compositions the Madonna and Child are generally i-epresented suiTounded by Saints, the latter being selected for various reasons, according to the taste or devotion of the proprietor of the picture. The donor is frequently introduced kneel- ing, sometimes alone, sometimes with his family, and in many cases a patron saint recommends the votaries. The ultimate intercession of the Madonna is, however, distinctly intimated by her appearing in the character of the ' Mater Dei.' When she is represented alone, her action is more directly that of a suppliant. — Ed.] ' [This is one of the instances in which the severity of the author's criti- cism is unsupported by high authorities. — Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 379 has much more repose and grandeur as a whole, and unites the sublime and abstract character of sacred beings with the individuality of nature in the happiest manner. It is now in the Escurial, but was originally painted for S. Domenico, at Naples,' about 1513. It represents the Madonna and Child on a throne ; on one side is St. Jerome ; on the other tlie guardian angel with the young Tobias, who carries a fish (whence the name of the picture). The artist has imparted a wonderfully poetic character to the subject. St. Jerome, kneeling on the steps of the throne, has been reading from a book to the Virgin and Child, and appears to have been inter- rupted by the entrance of Tobias and the Angel. The infant Christ turns towards them, but at tlie same time lays his hand on the open book, as if to mark the place. The Virgin turns towards the Angel, who introduces Tobias ; while the latter, dropping on his knees, looks up meekly to the Di\'ine infant. St. Jerome looks over the book to the new comers, as if ready to proceed with his occupation after the intei-ruption. All the figures are graceful and dignified. The majesty and sweetness of the Virgin, the interesting sympathy of the Child, the thoughtful gravity of St. Jerome, the easy, bending figure of the Angel, the inexpressible naivete of Tobias, all combine in beautiful harmony, and leave a refined impression on the feel- ings of the spectator. The most important of this class is the Madonna di San Sisto (40), in the Dresden Gallerj\ Here the Madonna appears as the queen of the heavenly host, in a brilliant glory of countless angel-heads, standing on the clouds, with the eternal Son in her arms ; St. Sixtus and St. Barbara kneel at the sides. Both of them seem to connect the picture with the real spectators. A curtain, drawn back, encloses the picture on each side : underneath is a light parapet, on which two beautiful boy-angels lean. The Madonna is one of the most wonderful creations of Raphael's pencil : she is at once the exalted and blessed woman of whom the Saviour was born, and the tender earthly Virgin whose pure and humble nature ' For that chapel where prayers for the recovery from all diseases of the eye were especially oft'ered up. This accounts for the introdiictiou of Tobit with the fish, which has puzzled so many. 380 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEiSTTURY. Book V. was esteemed worthy of so great a destiny. There is some- thing scarcely describable in her countenance ; it expresses a timid astonishment at the miracle of her own elevation, and at the same time, the freedom and dignity resulting from the consciousness of her divine situation. The Child rests natu- rally, but not listlessly, in her arms, and looks down upon the world with a serious expression. Never has the loveliness of childhood been blended so touchingly with a deep felt solemn consciousness of the holiest calling, as in the features and countenance of this Child. The eye is with difficulty disen- chanted from the deep impressions produced by these two figures, so as to rest upon the grandeur and dignity of the Pope, the lowly devotion of St. Barbara, and the cheerful innocence of the two angel-children. This is a rare example of a picture of Kaphael's later time executed entirely by his own hand. No design, no study of the subject for the guidance of a scholar, no old engraving, after such a study, has ever come to light. The execution itself evidently shows that the picture was painted without any such preparation. Proofs are not wanting even of alterations in the original design — the t\vo angels in the lower part are very evidently a later addition by the master's hand. Accordmg to Vasari, Raphael painted this picture for the principal altar of St. Sixtus, at Piacenza — at least it was there in his time, and was only removed to Dresden in the last century. It has been supposed, with great probability, that it had been intended for a proces- sion-picture.' Though this supposition has not been actually substantiated, yet both the composition and condition of the picture argue for it, and we can conceive the elevating im- pression that this glorified appeai'ance must have produced as it was borne slowly along over the heads of adoring multitudes, accompanied by the lights, the incense, and the sacred songs of the different orders. To this class belongs also the Saint Cecilia, executed in the earlier years* of Raphael's residence in Rome, and now in the 1 For the grounds of this supposition, see Von Kuniohr, Italienische Forschungen, iii. 129, etc.; and Drei Reisen nach Italien, p. 74, etc. • [It appears to have been completed in 1516. The inscription in the chapel is comparatively modern, and hence no authority. See Passavant, ii. 181, note. — Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 381 Gallery of Bologna. It was originally in San Giovanni a Monte, and adorned the altar of the Bentivoglj, for whom it was painted. St. Cecilia is placed in the centre, svirrounded by four Saints ; St. John and St. Augustine behind her ; St. Paul and Mar}' Magdalene in front, at the sides of the picture. Above, in the clouds, is a glorj^ of angels singing hymns. At the feet of Mary Magdalene lie some musical instruments partly broken ; St. Cecilia raises her eyes to the Angels, and appears to listen to their songs. She holds a small organ reversed, wdth its tubes beginning to fall out, indicating, like the other scattered and broken instruments, the relation of earthly to heavenly music. St, John, an extremely beautiful head, regards the inspired coimtenance of the Saint with holy rapture : St. Augustine is more tranquil. St. Paul, a noble figure in very grand drapery, looks thoughtfully down on the instruments, whose sounds have ceased. Mary Magdalene, whose mild expression reminds us of Raphael's youthful pictures, turns to the spectator, directing his attention to the holy scene. There appears in the expression throughout this simply arranged group a progressive sympathy, of which the revelation made to St, Cecilia forms the central point. Still that noble and beautiful countenance does not express all the sublimity and holiness which might be expected from the subject ; and it can scarcely be supposed that this defect is entirely owing to the restorations, although they are said to be considerable. Two more altar-pictures close this series : they represent single figures of Saints ; two pictures with St. Margaret as the Conqueror of the Dragon.' One is in the Gallery of Vienna. It represents the Saint at the moment when the fearful monster winds himself round her ; she raises the cru- cifix against him. The picture has something in attitude and gesture which shows Michael Angelo's influence, and is pro- bably by the hand of Giulio Romano. The second is in Paris, and is said to have been originally painted for Francis I. It is of Raphael's later time, and the greater part is by Giulio ' [The legend (from Simeon Metaphrastes) will be found in Lippomanus De Vitis t>anctorum, ii. 165 : see also Mrs. Jameson's Poetry of Sacred and Legendaiy Ait, vol. ii. p, 130. — Ed.] 382 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Romano. Here, Margaret stands on the wing of the dragon, and holds in her right hand the palm of victory. Pier coun- tenance expresses maidenly innocence and grace. Alas ! this picture has been almost wholly destroyed by transferring it from wood to canvas. The Archangel Michael, in the gallery of the Louvre, is a very remarkable picture, also painted by Raphael for Francis I, in 1517. Like a flash of lightning the heavenly champion darts upon Satan, who, in desperation, writhes at his feet. The angel is clad in scaly armour, and bears a lance in his hands, with which he aims a deathblow at his antagonist. The air of grandeur, beauty, and calm majesty in the winged youth, the rapidity of the movement, the bold foreshortening of Satan, hurled on the lava rocks, have a most impressive effect. In various galleries we find representations of John the Baptist in the wilderness, as a youth, seated fronting to the spectator, and pointing with enthusiasm to a cross which is erected beside him. 'J'lie greater number, if not all, must have been executed by scholars from drawings after the model, by the master (such as the one in the Uffizj at Florence, which is of remarkable beauty). An excellent one in the Gallery at Darmstadt is painted somewhat in the style of Bronzino ; others are at Florence, Bologna, Paris, in England, etc. A o-ood and somewhat later copy, ascribed to Francesco Salviati, is in the Berlin Museum.' Two large historical altar-pictures still claim our attention ; they belong also to Raphael's later period. The earliest is the picture of Christ bearing the Cross, in the Museum of Madrid, known by the name of " LoSpasimodi Sicilia," from the convent of Santa Maria dello Spasimo at Palermo, for which it was painted. Here, as in the tapestries, we again find a finely conceived development of the event, and an excel- lent composition. The procession which conducts the Saviour to Mount Calvaiy has just reached a turn in the road. He sinks under the weight of the cross ; an executioner, who stands at the edge of the picture (a figure of athletic form 1 Compare V. Rumohr, Ital. Forsch, iii. 135. ST. MICHAEL ; by Raphael, in the Louvre. page 382 ^ä0^ <:» LO SPASIMO ; by Raphael, now at Madrid. Cliap. IV. RAPHAEL. 383 somewhat ostentatiously displayed), endeavours to pull him up by the rope which is passed round his body. Simon of Cyrene, who met the procession, a powerful figure, turns angrily towards the executioner, and stoops to free Christ from his burden, while another, standing behind him, again presses it down on the holy martyr. The latter, regardless of his own grief, turns his face consolingly to the group of women who press near to him on the opposite side. The Madonna, her hands extended in despair towards her son, sinks on her knees, supported by John and Mary Magdalene. Behind them follows a procession of soldiers, from the gates of the city ; a standard-bearer, who rides before the executioners, already turns in the direction of the mountain seen in the background. Amidst this combination of varied forms, the figure of Christ is kept distinct with consummate art, so that, though placed in a position so unfavourable, it displays a peculiar nobleness. The head, with an expression of the holiest patience and divine sorrow, forms the central point of the picture : the heads of the executioners, of Simon, and of the women, surround it as in a half-circle.' Among the friends of the Saviour the various degrees of sympathy are admirably expressed ; yet (if it is allocable to judge from the engraving) we observe in some of the single lieads, particularly the Magdalene's, something of the exaggerated sharpness of outline already noticed in the Madonna di Fuligno. The later of these two pictures is the Transfiguration on Mount Tabor, now in the Vatican, formerly in S. Pietro at Montorio. This was the last work of the master (not finished till after his death) ; the one which was suspended over his corpse, a trophy of his fame, for public homage. If the picture last described is distinguished, like the com- positions for the Tapestries, by the dramatic development of an historical event, by the important prominence given to the principal incident, and by grandeur of style, the work now under consideration unites with these qualities a profounder symbolical treatment, which, in the representation of a par- ' [The composition of this picture is evidentlj imitated from Albert Dürer. JIarc Antonio had copied the German artist's designs for the ' Pas- sion.' — Ed.] 384 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. ticular event, expresses a general idea. In this instance it is the depth and power of thought which move the spectator and which address themselves to him at once, so that he needs no key to explain the meaning of the subject. This picture is divided into two parts, the undermost of which, on account of its mass, is the more important and predominant. On one side are nine of the Disciples ; on the other a crowd of people pressing towards them, bearing along a boy possessed with a devil. His limbs are fearfully convulsed by demoniac power ; he is supported by his father, who appears strenuously to implore assistance by words and looks ; two women beside him point to the sufferer, the one with earnest entreaties ; the other in the front, on her knees,' with an expression of pas- sionate energy. All are crying aloud, beseeching, and stretch- ing out their arms for aid. Among the disciples, who are disposed in different groups, astonishment, horror, and sym- pathy alternate in various degrees. One, whose youthful countenance expresses the deepest sympathy, turns to the unhappy father, plainly intimating his inability to assist him ; another points upwards ; a third repeats this gesture. The upper part of the picture is formed by an elevation to repre- sent Mount Tabor. There lie prostrate the three disciples who went up with Christ, dazzled by the Divine light ; above them, surrounded by a miraculous glory, the Saviour floats in air, in serene beatitude, accompanied by Moses and Elias. The twofold action contained in this picture, to which shallow critics have taken exception, is explained historically and satisfactorily merely by the fact that the incident of the pos- sessed boy occurred in the absence of Christ ; but it explains itself in a still higher sense, when we consider the deeper, universal meaning of the picture. For this purpose it is not even necessary to consult the books of the New Testament for the explanation of the particular incidents : the lower portion represents the calamities and miseries of human life^ — the rule of demoniac power, the weakness even of the faithful when unassisted — and points to a superior Power. Above, in the brightness of Divine bliss, undisturbed by the suffering of the lower world, we behold the source of consolation and redemp- ' [Both the women are kneeling. — Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 385 tion from evil. Even the judicious liberties dictated by the nature of the art, which displease the confined views of many critics — such as the want of elevation in the mountain, the perspective alteration of the horizon and points of sight for the upper group (in which the figures do not appear fore- shortened, as seen from beneath, but perfectly developed, as if in a vision), give occasion for new and peculiar beauties. In one respect, however, the picture appears to fail : it wants the freer, purer beauty, the simplicity and flow of line (in the (h'apery especially), which address themselves so directly to the feeling of the spectator ; the work pleases tlie eye, the understanding, but does not entirely satisfy the soul : in this respect the picture already marks the transition to the later periods of Art. But this pa.ssing censure should be con- sidered as only hinted at. AVhere such grandeur and depth of thought, such unexampled excellence, have been accomplished (and we have given but a very general outline), it becomes us to öfter any approach to criticism with all humility. We may not pass over a picture which Raphael had under- taken in his youth (1505), but which was not painted till after his death by his heirs, Giulio Romano and Francesco Penni : it is the Coronation of the Virgin, painted for the convent of Santa Maria di Monte Luce at Perugia, and now in the Vatican. If any drawing of Raphael's was made use of, it could only have been for the upper portion of the picture, representing Christ and the Virgin enthroned on the clouds : this part, which is powerfully painted, representing two charm- ing figures of angels strewing flowers, and the figure of the Madonna, is attributed to Giulio Romano. The lower part, executed by Francesco Penni, in which the Apostles are assembled around the empty tomb of the Virgin, is as weak and ineffective in composition as in execution. Of the picture of St. Luke painting the Madonna (50), the head of the Saint only is attributable to Raphael. The Madonna and other parts are unequally executed. We now proceed to the Portraits, of which Raphael executed a great number in his best time. Their chief excellence, and the same may be said of those done in his earlier days, resides in their unaffected conception and characteristic expression ; s 386 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. but later portraits display also the purest, most admirable execution, the more so as in the essential parts no assistance could be given by his scholars. The most interesting are — The portrait of Bindo Altoviti (erroneously held to be Raphael's own portrait),' now in the Gallery at Munich, formerly in the Casa Altoviti at Rome. The head is that of a youth of about 22 years of age, with a black cap and long, fair hair, looking over his shoulder at the spectator ; his hand on his breast. It is a glowing Italian countenance, full of sensibility ; a slight melancholy pervades it, blended with a certain acuteness of expression. The execution is soft, with dark shadows. The Fornarina (i. e. the Baker), a name which, as applied to Raphael's mistress, does not occur before the middle of the last century. The history of this person, to whom Raphael was attached even to his death, is obscure, nor are we very clear with regard to her likenesses. In the Tribune at Florence there is a ]x>rtrait, inscribed with the date 1512, of a very beautiful woman, holding the fur trimming of her mantle with her right hand, which is said to represent her.* The forms are noble and pure ; the painting extremely fine, resembling the Venetian manner ; the hand and arm beautiful. 'Ihe ornaments heightened with gold, and the gold lights in the hair, are peculiar. This picture is decidedly by Rapliael, but can hardly represent the Fornarina ; at least it bears no resem- blance to the second picture of the Fornarina in the Barberini Palace in Rome, wliich bears the name of Raphael on the armlet, and of the authenticity of which (particularly with respect to the subject) there can hardly be a doubt. In this the figure is seated, and is uncovered to the waist ; she draws a light drapery around her ; a shawl is twisted round the head. The execution is beautiful and delicate, although the lines are sufficiently defined ; the forms are fine and not with- out beauty, but at the same time not free from an expression I Rumohr considers ft a portrait of Raphael. See Ital. Forsch., vol. iii. p. 109, and further. This is, however, sufficiently disproved by Passavant, vol. i. p. 185, and vol. ii. p. 143. « According to an hypothesis of Missirini (Longhena, p. 390), the picture was painted by Sebast. del Piombo,. after Michael Angelo, and represents Vittoria Colonna, Marchesa di Pescara, the friend of Michael Angelo. Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 387 of coarseness and common life. The eyes are large, dark, and full of fire, and seem to speak of brighter days. There are some repetitions of this picture, from the school of Raphael, in Roman galleries. A draped female portrait of Raphael's later time, in the Pitti Palace, which appears to represent the same individual, though at a younger period, is of higher beauty and most enchanting grace, and of true Roman charac- ter also. This figure may possibly have served as Raphael's model for the Sistine Madonna. The head alone, however, and the light damask sleeve, appear to be by the master's hand. Other portraits which bear the name of the Fornarina may be passed over.' Pope Julius II., in the Pitti Palace at Florence. — The high-minded old man is here represented seated in an arm- chair, in deep meditation. The small, piercing eyes are deeply set under the open, projecting forehead ; they are quiet, but full of unextinguished power. The nose is proud and Roman, the lips firmly compressed ; all the features are still in lively, elastic tension ; the execution of the whole picture is masterly. There are several repetitions ; one is in the Gal- lery of the Uffizj, representing the Pope in a red dress.'^ A good copy is also in the Berlin Museum ; another at Mr. Miles's, of Leigh Court. Pope Leo X., with Cardinals de' Medici and de' Rossi, in the Pitti Palace, Florence. — The Pope sits at a table, the breviary open before him ; the Cardinals are behind, on each side. The principal merits of this work are, the wonderfully characteristic expression of the three different heads, the truth of imitation in the accessories, and the mastery displayed in the management of the general tone. There is an excellent copy by Andrea del Sarto in the Museum of Naples. The Violin Player, in the Sciarra Palace, Rome. — A youth holding the bow of a violin and a laurel-wreath in his hand, and looking at the spectator over his shoulder. The expres- sion of the countenance is sensible and decided, and betokens a character alive to the impressions of sense, yet severe. The execution is excellent — inscribed with the date 1518. ' [Passavant (Kunstreise, i. 225) prefers the portrait in the Palazzo Pitti.— Ed.] ^ [Another repetition is in the National Gallery. — Ed.] s 2 388 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEXTURY. Book V. Joanna of Arragon. — Numerous repetitions of this portrait exist : that in the collection of Baron Speck, of Sternburg-, Leipzig" (formerly in the gallery of Count Fries, at Vienna), is much esteemed ; another is in Warwick Castle ; a third in the gallery of the Louvre. Tliis last, with the exception of the head, is attributed to Giulio Romano. A copy, by a scholar of Leonardo da Vinci (falsely ascribed to the master), is in the Doria gallery, Rome. Several repetitions are in other places. These pictures represent a lady in the bloom of beauty ; she sits fronting the spectator in a splendid red cos- tume ; the outline of the face and features is inexpressibly pure and soft ; the hair, fair and rich, falls on the shoulders ; the large, dark eyes, of velvet softness, are turned to the spectator. Joanna was the daughter of Ferdinand of Arra- gon, Duke of Montalto, and wife of Ascanio Colonna, Prince of Tagliacozzo. She was surnamed " divine," from her beauty. Three hundred poets employed their pens to hand down her fame to posterity.' The following also belong to Raphael's most intellectual }X)rtraits : — Cardinal Giulio de' Medici — the same head and attitude as that in the above-mentioned portrait of Leo X., and without doubt the study for it. Count Castiglione — noble, chivalrous, dignified, full of fire and life. A Youth, resting his head on his hand with a pleasing carelessness.* All three in the gallery of the Louvre. Cardinal Bibiena writing, looking upwards with a serious, thoughtful expression. Fedra Inghirami, Seci'etary to the Conclave : both in the Pitti Palace. This last is very remarkable for the skill and manner in which Raphael has converted a fat, squinting man, into a subject of great character and attraction. Francesco Penni, Raphael's scholar, in the collection of the Prince of Orange, Brussels.^ But many of the portraits which bear Raphael's ' See the essay of W. Gerhard in the Tub. Kunstblatt, ' Johanna von Arragonien,' 1833, Nos. 15 and 16. To judge from the not very attractive treatment of the head in the Louvre specimen, and from the somewliat liarsh individuality impai ted to it, Raphael would seem not to have belonged to the ardent adorers of this celebrated beauty. * Passavant, vol. ii. p. 88, assigns this picture to Raphael's Florentine epoch, which, however, we cannot reconcile with the finished freedom of the execution. 8 [This gallery was removed to the Hague, after the accession of the late King of Holland.— Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 389 name are entitled to this distinction only in a very subordinate degree ; many even belong to an essentially different school. Among this class may be mentioned the portrait of the poet Tibaldeo, in the possession of Professor Scarpa, at La Motta (between Treviso and Udine) ; Fed. Caroiidelet, Archdeacon of Bitunto, in the possession of the Duke of Grafton in Lon- don ; that known in the Paris Museum by the name of " Raphael and his Fencing Master," by some attributed to Pontormo ; the Two Lawj^ers, Bartolo and Baldo, in the Doria gallery at Rome, excellent heads, but more in the Venetian style, are decidedly in some parts the work of Raphael. A very interesting portrait, said to be that of Caisar Borgia, in the Borghese gallery at Rome, is ascribed to Raphael. It is, however, neither the portrait ofthat Prince nor the work of Raphael. With the exception of the portraits just enumerated, the works of Raphael hitherto described are for the most part representations from sacred history. Some subjects still remain to be mentioned, taken from the classic fictions of antiquity. Raphael did not employ these materials, as is now the prac- tice, in an unprofitable, learned manner ; he did not desire to reproduce tlie modes of thinking and feeling peculiar to the ancients, and which must be foreign to our modern concep- tions : he regarded them merely as a bright play of fancy, which afforded an opportunity for the introduction of graceful forms as a pleasing embellishment for apartments devoted to festal purposes. In these productions, therefore, we again perceive the artist's peculiar feeling for beauty, which could here freely expatiate. This style liad been already aimed at in the subordinate decorations of the Vatican Loggie. It appears in a much more important form in some larger works, especially in the frescos in the Roman villa of Agostino Chigi (a rich friend of the arts, for whom Raphael also executed the Sibyls in the Church of Santa Maria della Pace). This villa is in Traste- vere, and now bears the name of the Farnesina, from its later possessors of the house of Farnese. On the ceiling of a large hall facing the garden, Raphael represented scenes from the story of Psyche ; on the flat part of the ceiling are two large 390 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. compositions, with numerous figures, — the Judgment of the Gods, who decide tlie dispute between Venus and Cupid, and the Marriage of Cupid and Psyche in the festal assembly of the gods. In the lunettes of the ceiling are amorini, with the attributes of those gods who have done homage to the power of Love. In the triangular compartments between the lunettes are different groups, illustrative of the incidents in the fable. They are of great beauty, and are examples of the most taste- ful disposition in a given space. The picture of the three Graces, that in which Cupid stands in an imploring attitude before Jupiter, a third, where Psyche is borne away by Loves, are extremely graceful.' Peevish critics have designated these representations as common and sensual, but the noble spirit visible in all Raphael's works prevails also in these : religious feeling could naturally find no place in them ; but they are conceived in a spirit of the purest artlessness, always a proof of true moral feeling, and to which a naiTow taste alone could object. In the execution, indeed, we recognise little of Raphael's fine feeling ; the greatest part is by his scholars, after his cartoons, particularly by G. Romano. The nearest of the three Graces, in the group before alluded to, appears to be by Raphael's own hand.^ In the same villa, in an adjoining saloon, is a fresco known by the name of the 'Galatea;' painted 1514. The greater part of this is Raphael's own work, and the execution is con- sequently much superior to that of the others. It represents the goddess of the sea borne over the waves in her shell ; tritons and nymphs sport joyously around her ; amorini, dis- charging their arrows, appear in the air like an angel-glory. The utmost sweetness, the most ardent sense of pleasure breathe from this work ; everything lives, feels, vibrates with enjoyment. And here again the spectator recognizes that ' Two chaiining drawings, nearly six feet long, still exist of the two large ceiling representations, called the Feast of the Gods, and the JIarriage of Cupid and Psyche. They are slightly coloured, and only partially finished ; nevertheless they so far surpass the frescos in beauty, that we are inclined to take them for Raphael's own designs. They were for sale in the year 1846. ^ [The heaviness of the forms, the chief defect of these frescos, may be generally attributed to Giulio Komano : the colour, again, is not even that of Raphael's scholars, as the whole work was restored and much repainted by Carlo Maratti. — Ed.] Chap. IV. RAPHAEL. 391 perfect purity which is so true an element of beauty ; the more so, since, with the exception of the group to the right of the goddess, the pencil has been guided by the master's own hand. There is a series of engravings by scholars of Marc Antonio, which represent the history of Psyche, differing from these frescos, but also ascribed to Raphael. Vasari names as their autlior the Flemish artist Michael Coxcie, who worked some time in Raphael's school. If these designs are not in general worthy of Raphael, there are some, and even the greater num- ber of the separate groups, of sufficient beauty to warrant the conclusion that the scholar must occasionally have made use of the drawings of the master. There are other very charming representations of mytholo- gical subjects, though much injured, in the bath-room of Car- dinal Bibiena, in the Vatican, above Raphael's Loggie, falsely called " il Ritiro di Giulio II." Seven small pictures are here still seen upon the walls, surrounded with charming decora- tions, which, together with the small remnants on the ceiling, represent the dominion and power of love among the gods. These were for the most part designed by Raphael and ex- ecuted by his best scholars. The Birth of Venus, for example, is of the highest grace ; also A'^enus and Cupid on dolphins, and Cupid complaining to Venus of his wound. The rest are chiefly designed by Giulio Romano. On the ceiling is seen Cupid triumpliing over Pan in mock combat ; and six conquer- ing amorini in various festive attitudes, painted on a black ground, are on the walls beneath the chief pictures. There are repetitions of these designs in the frescos of a villa erected on the ruins of the palace of the Caesars, known as the Villa Spada (also known as the Villa Santini, Magnani, Mills, «fcc, according to its successive owners). Other mythological frescos were formerly in the so-called Villa of Raphael ' (also Villa Olgiati and Nelli) in the gardens of the Borghese palace. The three cliief pictures have, however, been recently detached from the walls and removed to the Borghese palace. ' [No early authority speaks of this house as Raphael's villa : the decora- tions it contained were copied not only from Raphael, but from various masters : the building itself now no longer exists. — Ed.] 392 MASTEES OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Tlie piece representing tlie Nuptials of Alexander and Eoxana is from an excellent design of Raphael's, executed probably by Perino del Vaga ; while the Marriage of Vertumnus and Pomona is the composition of one of his scholars. The third piece is an imitation of ä masterly composition by Michael Angelo — naked figures darting impetuously through the air are aiming their arrows at a statue of Hermes, while Cupid lies slumbering by. In once more reviewing the immense number of Raphael's creations in painting, we must not omit, in addition to them, to mention, that he directed the works of St. Peter's, from his own plan, from the middle of the year 1514 ; that he had executed several other architectural works ; that in the latter j^ears of his life he was zealously occupied in superintending . the exhumation of the monuments of antiquity, and in design- ing a restoration of ancient Rome ; that he did not even omit to undertake works in sculpture ; and that he died in his tliirty-seventh year. When we consider these facts, we shall be filled with astonishment at the inexhaustible creative power of this master — a power never equalled in its perfection. Other masters, in their single works, perhaps in a great part of them, may claim a place beside him, but in general they had not the energy to maintain such unvarying excellence. In this respect Raphael, without any exception, is the most distinguished of modern artists. And if, even in his case, we find some less pei'fect productions, some occasional tendency toward a more superficial manner, this only proves that, great as he was, he shared the lot of all that is human. Raphael died of a short and violent fever ; his delicate constitution, wrought to the highest degree of susceptibility by the unceasing activity of his mind and body, otfered no resistance to the violence of the disease. Unutterable was the sorrow which filled all classes in Rome, high and low — the Pope, the court, the friends and scholars of the artist. •' I cannot believe myself in Rome," writes Count Castiglione, " now that my poor Raphael is no longer here." Men re- garded his \\orks with religious veneration, as if God had revealed himself through Raphael as in former days through the prophets. His lifeless remains were publicly laid out on Chap. IV. EAPHAEL, 393 a splendid catafalque, while his last work, the Transfigura- tion, was suspended over his head. He was buried in the Pantheon, under an altar adorned by a statue of the Holy Virgin, a consecration -offering from Raphael himself. Doubts having been raised as to the precise spot, a search was made in the Pantheon in 1833, and Raphael's bones were found ; the situation agreeing exactly with Vasari's description of the place of interment. On the 18th of October, in the same year, the relics were reinterred in the same spot with great solemnities. [NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL SITUATION OF THE TAPESTRIES. It was unnecessary to divide the tapestries of the Cappella Sistina into two series ; they form in fact but one, and it is of importance to consider them in this light, as there is a second series (of which, indeed, the author speaks, p. 366), done chiefly from designs by Raphael's scholars. The remarks that follow relate to the iirst entire series alone. The general plan of the Sistine Chapel has been already described (p. 200, note). The whole area, it was observed, is divided into two unequal parts by a white marble balustrade ; the larger of these divisions, as in the old Basilicas, was appropriated to the presbytery. The frescos by Peru- gino and others, on the walls below the windows, but still at a con- siderable height from the inlaid pavement, extended entirely round the chapel ; the space underneath them was decorated with imitations of em- broidered hangings, to represent the costly ornaments of this kind used in the ancient Byzantine and Roman churches. These decorations were separated at regular intervals by painted pilasters adorned with arabesques. Leo the Tenth, soon after his accession, appears to have conceived the plan of ornamenting the Presbyterium, or portion of the chapel within the balus- trade, with real hangings. Eleven tapestries were accordingly executed under his auspices from cartoons by Raphael, and thus restored, in a far more perfect form, the ancient splendour of the Christian temples. The tapestries were separated, like the painted hangings, by pilasters in the same material, adorned with arabesques, and underneath the large subjects were narrower compositions in bronze colour, forming an apparent dado or socle. The new decorations were confined, as before observed, to the Presbyterium, thus giving it a more sacred character than the rest of the chapel. At the altar was a tapestry representing the Coronation of the Virgin (Passavant, ii. 258) ; above it still remained a fresco by Perugino, repre- senting the Assumption. On the right (of the spectator, facing the altar), and on a line with the former subject, was the tapestry of the Conversion of St. Paul, and on the left that of the Calling of St. Peter (Miraculous Draught S3 - 394 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. of Fishes) ; the first was under the fresco of tlie Birth of Christ, the latter under the fresco of the Finding of Moses (p. 200, note). These six subjects filled the lower part of the altar wall before Michael Angelo's Last Judgment occasioned their removal, in the time of Paul III. On the right wall, next, and at right angles with, the Conversion of St. Paul, the order of the tapes- tries was as follows : — the Punishment of Elymas, Paul and Barnabas at Lystra, Paul preaching at Athens, and the same apostle in prison during the earthquake. The last tapestry was much narrower than the rest, owing to the occupation of part of the space by the gallery of the choristers. On the opposite wall, beginning at right angles from the Calling of Peter, were Christ's Chai-ge to Peter, the Martyrdom of Stephen, Peter and John Healing the Lame Man, and the Death of Ananias. The circumstance of the Pope's throne being on this side, again compelled a variety in the dimensions of tlie tapestries, and tlie Martyrdom of Stephen is thus of a much narrower form than the rest. These tapestries were copied in the colours of the Cartoons, but were more ornamented, the accessories being enriched with gold. The bronze-coloured designs underneath partly represented scenes from the life of Leo the Tenth. (For the account of the original situation of the tapestries, as above described, with the exception of the Coronation of the Virgin, see the interesting Essay by the Chevalier Bunsen in the Beschreibung der Stadt Rom, vol. ii. book 2, p. 408.) It was before observed, that works of art done under the auspices of the Church of Rome, for the decoration of her temples, may be generally assumed to have reference either to Christ, the Madonna, or the Church. With the Acts of the Apostles the history of the Church strictly begins, and Raphael selected the Acts of St. Peter, those of the Apostle of the Gentiles, and the death of the first martyr, to illustrate the commencement of her power and of her sufferings ; the Coronation of the Virgin might be con. [There is a ceiling in the Archbishop's palace at Udine painted by Giovanni in t'lie style of the Loggie of the Vatican: the ai list's house, deco- rated with stucco ornaments and figures in relief, also exists. — Ed.] Chap. VI. MASTEES OF SIEXA AXD VEROXA, 411 Raphael exercised on the art of engraving. In this depart- ment, Mareantonio Raimondi, or Marco del Francia, of Bologna, is particularly distinguished : he received his first instructions in the art of niello from Francesco Francia, then turned his attention to engraving, and began by copying his master's works ; he then imitated Mantegna, afterwards Albert Dürer, and perfected himself in drawing under Raphael, who distinguished him with his favour, and allowed him to engrave his drawings. Mareantonio also engraved after Michael Angelo, Giulio Romano, &c., in like manner from their own drawings. Two of his scholars assisted him in engraving after Raphael — Agostino Veneziano and Marco Ravignano: thus the art of engraving reached a high degree of perfection soon after its commencement in the studio of Raphael, tln-ough Mareantonio and his followers. In all that regards dra^ving and precision of outline, the engravings of this time have never been surpassed by later productions, though inferior in delicacy of modelling, gradation of tones, and other picturesque effects which are now required. The highest importance of this engraving school consisted in its having been so im- mediately under Raphael's influence, and so acted upon by his spirit, that it was able to render his style, even where, as in many cases, only a slight drawing served as a model and the accessories were left to them to complete in the spirit of the great master. Thus it happened that in the hands of such artists even the works of other painters acquired a Raphael- esque stamp. The spread of Raphael's fame, and the supre- macy of his style, is o^\'ing in no slight measure to their engravings. CHAPTER VI. MASTERS OF SIENA AND VERONA. We have already mentioned how the school of Siena, deeply as it had declined in the fifteenth century, sought to renew its powers at the congenial source of the Umbrian school. This attempt was successfully made by several painters in the T 2 412 MASTERS OF TUE SIXTEENTH CEXTURY. Book V. beginning of tlie sixteenth century, and especially by Jacopo Paccliiorotto (see p. 267). It required, however, the influ- ence of a master in whom every artistic quality belonging to the time should be united, to raise Sienese art to the high standard of the sixteenth century ; and such a master ap- peared in the person of the Londjard Gianantunio Razzi — born about 1480, died 1549 — who was one of the most attractive painters of his time. Razzi was a native of Ver- celli, and appears to have been formed under Leonardo da Vinci ; he afterwards settled in Siena, of which place he became a citizen. In his figures, particularly of women, he resembles Leonardo ; they unite grace, tenderness, and sweetness with an earnestness and fervour not to be found perhaps in any other artist. Had the sentiment of beauty been more fixed in his mind, had his drawing and grouping been more coiTect, he would have been one of the first artists of any time. The earliest known works of Razzi (about 1502) are the twenty-six well-preserved frescoes representing the history of St. Benedict, in tiie convent of S. Cliveto Maggiore (not far from the high road between Siena and Rome), where Luca Signorelli had already executed some works.' Here he appears severe, and evidently aims at indi- viduality of character. Soon after this he pahited the Miracle of tiie Loaves and Fishes, in the refectory of the neighbouring convent of S. Anna, a work which is also in a good state of preservation. At a later period he was employed by Julius II. in Rome. His works in the Vatican, with the exception of some arabesques and ornaments on the ceilings, were soon eftaced, to make way for Rapiiael. A few of his pictures are preserved in the Farnesina, where he painted the Marriage of Alexander with Roxana, and Alexander in the Tent of Darius, in an apartment uf the upper story. Here we see tlie most attractive and gracefid female forms, although many of the details betray a want of practical skill and experience. Razzi appears more important in his later works ; his best work is at Siena, in S. Domenico, in the chapel of S. Caterina da Siena. On the altar-wall he has represented, on one side, [' Kumuhr Ital. Forsch, vol. ii., p. 387, — Ed.] Chap. VI. MASTERS OF STEXA AXT) YEROXA. 413 St. Catherine in ecstasy ; God the Father, -with the Madonna and the infant Christ, appear to her, with several inexpressibly beautiful angels ; on the other side of the altar the saint is represented fainting-, supported by nuns, while Christ appears above. This is a very masterly picture ; the pathetic expres- sion of the figure and countenance is wonderfully beautiful. A third picture on a side wall is not remarkable as a com- position, but excellent in the single figures. Razzi executed another work of great merit in conjunction with Pacchiarotto (see p. 267) and another Sienese, Becca- fumi, in the oratory of the brotherhood of St. Bernardino : here the history of the Virgin is represented in figures larger than life in several pictures, divided by light pilasters ; the greater part is Razzi's ; his spirit pervades the whole, and even raises the works of his fellow-labourers to its own peculiar sphere. The best of these works are the Visit of Mary to Elizabeth, and the Assumption. There are also frescos by Razzi in the public palace, and altarpieces in different churches of Siena : for example, a Deposition from tlie Cross, of the year 1513, in S. Francesco ; some frescos in S. Spirito ; an Adoration of the Kings in S. Agostino ; with other works on private houses and on the town gates of S. Viene. Otherwise his works are not frequently met with in collections, and for this reason he is far less known than he deserves. In Florence there are excellent works by him ; for example, a St. Sebastian, in the Uffizj, a figure drawn in the noblest proportions, though very severe in colouring : in this last respect it is an exception to his general style, for a soft and warm tone is one of the characteristic beauties of his works ; the expression of grief in the countenance is of the most touching beauty. A Resurrection in the Studj gallery at Naples is distinguished by the beautiful forms of the angels, and by a highly animated expression. A portrait of Lucretia, painted for Agostino Chigi, of very beautiful form, worthy even of Raphael, is now in the possession of the Hanoverian minister at Rome, M. Comthur v. Kestner. A Scourging of Clu'ist, transposed from the wall to canvas, is in the Academy at Siena. An excellent Sacrifice of Abraham is in the chapel of the Canipo Santo at Pisa. A Dead Christ, 414 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEXTÜRY. Book V. surrounded by his disciples, somewhat coarsely executed, but of a grand character, in the Berlin Museum, and a charming and excellently painted Madonna in the Borghese Palace at Rome, are both ascribed to Razzi. Michael Anselmi (surnamed Michelangelo da Siena) and Bartolommeo Neroni, who commonly bore the name of Maestro Riccio, were scholars of Razzi. Two large paint- ings by the latter, in the Sienese Academy, already show the influence of the Florentine manner, and remind us but little of his first instructor. Domenico Beccafumi (surnamed Mec- cherino) has been mentioned as having been employed with Razzi in the oratory of S. Bernardino : in those works he approaches to the noble, simjjle grace of his master : in the Sienese Academy there is a grand and beautiful altar-picture by him. In his latter works, however, he is more mechanical, and only retains the beautiful external forms he had learned in Florence ; but as his colours are always clear and lasting, his pictures (some of which are preserved in the public palace in Siena) produce at least an agreeable effect on the eye. One of the most interesting of his later works is the pavement of the choir of the Duomo at Siena, which is formed of a mosaic of briglit and dark marbles, with lines of sliading in the style of niello. Older works of this kind, which are quite peculiar to this cathedral, are merely drawn, in a manner re- sembling niello. This series of the Sienese artists closes Avith Baldassare Peruzzi (1481-1536), one of the best modern architects, and who, as such, fills an important place in the history of archi- tecture ; he also deserves honourable mention as a painter. His progress is similar in development to that of his Sienese contemporaries ; for example, there are paintings by him on the ceiling of the saloon of the Farnesina (in which Raphael painted his " Galatea''), which rather lean to the early style of the fifteenth century, but contain some graceful and in- teresting details. The paintings which he executed on the walls of the tribune in S. Onofrio in Rome, below the paint- ings of Piuturicchio in the semi-dome, are more important, yet still in the old style ; they represent a Madonna enthroned with saints — on one side the Adoration of the Kings, on the Chap, VI. MASTEKS OF SIENA AND VERONA. 415 other the Flight into Egypt — and contain very graceful heads. A standing figure of Charity, with three children, of severe beauty, is in the Berlin Museum. At a later period Peruzzi adopted the Roman style, but sacrificed, in his efforts after external beauty of form, the artless grace which distinguished his early works. His principal work at this time is a picture in the little church Fonte Giusta at Siena — a Sibyl announcing the birth of Christ to Augustus. The figure of the sibyl *is not without grandeur, but the eflfect of the whole is cold. An altarpiece in S. Maria della Pace at Rome (the first chapel on the left), and a Presentation of the Virgin (in the same church), in which the architectural portions are the chief features in the picture, are of inferior value. An Adoration of the Kings, in the Bridgewater Gallery in London, is of in- different merit in the heads, and, as in Peruzzi's later manner, fantastic in the costumes.* Peruzzi was also distinguished in arcldtectural decorative painting ; the Farnesina (in Rome), which was built by him, contained beautiful examples of this style, but the decorations of an apartment in the second story are all that remain. Tlie beautiful ornaments of the exterior, executed in green, have disappeared ; and this graceful building, once so much admired, now makes but a poor appearance. The Veronese Gianfrancesco Carotto (about 1470-1546) may be compared to Razzi in the general tendency of his style, and the success with which he followed it up ; like tlie Sienese painter, too, he is less known than he deserves. Out of Verona his works are very rare ; but in the churches of that city, as well as in the Palazzo del Consiglio, there are ample materials from which an idea may be formed of his merit. He was educated in the school of Andrea Mantegna, but has little in common with him ; he inclines much more to the manner of Leonardo, and must have derived his peculiar taste from the influence of that master : in his later works, however, there is an evident approach to Raphael's style ; and in this instance, fortunately, it has not produced the in- ^ [Another picture of this subject, ascribed to Peruzzi, as well as a corre- sponding drawing, is in the N;itional üallery. Respecting a painting of the same composition by Girolamo du Trevigi, see Vasari, Life of Peruzzi. — Ed.] 416 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEEXTII CENTURY. Book V. jurious effects of which we have already given so many examples. In his early works Carotto appears constrained, and leans to the older manner, particularly that of Girolamo dai Libri ; his best and niatarest characteristics are seen in his works in the Cappella deg^li Spolverini, in S. Eufeniia at Verona. In the middle picture of the altar are represented the three arch- aligels, in the side panels two female saints ; the expression in tlie heads of the angels Ls extremely mild and noble — that of St. Michael especially has an almost celestial purity : the upper portions of the figures are very beautiful, the lower limbs are less perfect. The two female saints have more of a statue-like severity, and are cold in expression. On the side wall Carotto painted the History of Tobias : of these excellent pictures the lower one is especially graceful ; the mother of Tobias embraces her daughter-in-law, while Tobias himself heals the eyes of his blind father. These frescoes are, alas ! in some parts painted over and much injured. The warm and well-blended colouring of Carotto forms a peculiar contrast to the severe style of his drawing. CHAPTER VII. CORREGGIO AND HIS SCHOLARS. Antonio Allegri,' surnamed " Correggio " from his birth- place, was born in 1494 and died in 1534 : he probably received his first instructions in the school of Mantegna, that is, from Francesco Mantegna, for Andrea died in 1506. It is also ascertained that Francesco Bianchi Ferrari, belonging to the old Lombard school (see j). 231), was his teacher.* ' See Gius. Ratti, Xotizie storiche sincere intorno la vita ed opera di An- tonio Allegri da Correggio, Finale 1781. Pungileoni, Jlemorie istoriche di Ant. Allegri, detto il Correggio : Parma, 1817. Outlines in Landen, Vies et Qiuvres, etc. ; Corre'ge. See also the Gemian translation of Vasari, vol. iii. part ii. p. 60. Correggio's poverty is probably much exaggerated : the well-known anecdote of his death is a fable. Vasari i», however, pro- bably correct in saying that Correggio was never in Rome, 2 See Waagen's Paris, p. 420. Chap. VII. CORREGGIO AXD HIS SCHOLARS. 417 The works of Leonardo da Vinci, however, and Iiis school appear to have exercised a more important influence on him, though only as a preparation for that manner which he after- wards formed for himself. Correggio is distinguished by a subjective mode of con- ception, of that kind which may perhaps be best defined by the word sensibility, but which is not to be confounded with the false, lachrymose sensibility which has become so much the fashion in modern times : it is rather susceptibility, the higlily- wrought capacity to feel, the liveliness of the affections, which are the pervading characteristics of Correggio's works. These qualities lead to a peculiar treatment and choice of subjects. In his compositions all is life and motion, even in subjects that seem to prescribe a solemn repose, such as simple altar-pictures. All his figures express the overflowing consciousness of life, the impidse of love and pleasure ; he delights to represent the buoyant glee of cliildhood — the bliss of earthly, the fervour of heavenly love ; seldom does sorrow intrude into his world of joy, but it is so much the deeper from the artist's vivid capacity for the opposite feeling. In the works of Correggio there is, on the whole, little display of beautiful forms ; the movements of his figures, which unceasingly produce the most varied foreshortening, are obviously opposed to it. So decided is his taste for these perspective appearances, that even a Madonna, seated in divine tranquillity on her throne, is represented by him as if seen from underneath, so that in the drawing her knees appear almost to touch her breast. But, instead of form, another element of beauty predominates in Correggio — that of chiaroscuro, that peculiar play of light and shade which spreads such an harmonious repose over his works. His com- mand over this element is founded on that delicacy of per- ception, that quickness of feeling, which is alive to every lighter play of form, and is thus enabled to reproduce it in exquisite modelling. Correggio knew how to anatomize light and shade in endless gradation ; to give the greatest brilliancy without dazzling, the deepest shade without offending the eye T 3' 418 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. by dull blackness. The relation of colours is observed with the same masterly skill, so that each appears in itself subdued, yet powerful in relation to others. But while Correofgio at- tained one of tlie hi' Church at Venice, is a picture of incomparably more importance (like the Peter Martyr it has suffered considerably). The fine, nobly foreshortened figure of the Saint, lighted above by a beam of Iieavenly glory, and below by the fire, exhibits far less the physical suffering than the sacred foi-titude of the Martyr — to the astonishment of tlie rude tormentors around him, some of whom show their feelings in increased malignity, others in admiration or in flight ; only^ a hardened veteran remains untouclied, and continues looking at the Saint without any change of emotion. To this is added an effect of light such as is perhaps unique in painting — the fire, the ray from above, the light from two pans of burning pitch, altogether producing a combination of liglit and reflection in the nocturnal scene Avhicl), in themselves, would have given the highest value to the commonest composition. Titian executed important pictures, principally of historical subjects, in the Palace of the Doge : they were destroyed by a fire which consumed almost the whole interior of the edifice, about the middle of the sixteenth century. A fresco of St. Christoplier, painted over a small staircase next to the chapel, is preserved. The head is fine ; the rest of the figure very mediocre. In the Palazzo del Consiglio at Verona, an histori- cal picture of very large size is ascribed to him. In this the Doge of Venice is represented on a throne, on each side of which are the senators in red costume ; on the right, the Sclavonian said thus much, it maybe granted that the author's general remark respecting Titian's superior treatment of grave subjects appears to be well founded, and instances of exaggerated action might undoubtedly be quoted. A certain imitation of Michael Angelo is to be recognized in some of Titian's works in the most vigorous period of his career; but this imitation seems to have been confined to qualities (such as contrast in action and grandeur of line) which were analogous to his own characteristic excellences. The Friar escaping from the Assassin, in the Pietro Martire, is as fine an example of the imion of these finalities in foiin as is to be found in the works of any painter : other instances were perhaps less successful. For the rest, the taste was not per- manent in Titian : he returned to that " senatorial dignity " which Reynolds has pointed out as one of his prominent qualities, and in this view the remark of the author must be alloweil its due weight. The description which follows of the i)icture representing the martyrdom of S. Lorenzo must be understood to refer to the original appearance of that work ; at present, parts of it are so much darkened as to be scarcely visible. — Ed.J Chap. Vlir. TITIAN-, 445 guard ; on the left, in white silk habiliments, the councillors of Verona, delivering up the banner and keys of their city to the Doge. Above, in the clouds, is the Virgin, with St. Mark and S. Zeno, the patron saints of Venice and Verona. The composition of this picture is not remarkably grand. In some parts (the figures of the saints for instance) the hand of an inferior artist is easily to be recognized. The portrait- heads are, however, very excellent, and full of life. In the representation of the naked female form, Titian dis- plays peculiar mastery ; the magic of his colouring is here developed in its fullest power. It must be remarked, how- ever, that this very mastery over his materials not unfrequently betrays him into an ostentatious exhibition of it, so that where we look for artlessness, for example in the freedom of domestic retirement, we find sometimes a studied display of beautiful limbs. This is very strikiug in a comparison between the two famous Venuses in the tribune of the Uffizj in Florence. The artlessness of one (she holds flowers iu her hand — in an ad- joining apartment women are taking garments out of a chest) powerfully fascinates the beholder ; the other (with Love standing behind), although displaying equal mastery in the execution, leaves the spectator cold. For the rest, the first- mentioned is wonderfully true to nature : the figure appears quite surrounded by light, for slie reclines on a white drapery before a light background, yet the forms are exquisitely rounded, and are very powerful in colour. Similar pictures are frequent — for example, at Dresden ; in the gallery at Naples thei'e is a beautiful Danae ; another is at Vienna ; other specimens of the kind are in England : a celebrated picture is in the gallery at Cambridge; in this instance Venus is personated by the Princess of Eboli, and Philip II. playing the lute sits beside her. Other excellent pictures of a similar class are also in England : two large ones of Diana and her Nymphs in the Bath are in the Stafford Gallery ; in one the subject of Actaeon is introduced — in the other the Disgrace of Calisto. Both these pictures belong to the later period of the master, and are greater in general effect than in execution. A repetition by his own hand of the picture of Calisto, painted for Philip IL, is in the Madrid Gallery ; another in the Bel- 446 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. vedere at Vienna. A charming picture of Venus rising from the sea and drjäng her liair is in the Stafford Gallery also — near her is a floating shell. Another, of Venus trying to keep Adonis from the Chase, is in the Madrid Gallery ; a second original repetition is in the Barberigo palace at Venice ; another is in the English National Gallery. In the Barberigo palace there is a picture of Venus (a half- length figure), with Cupid holding a mirror before her ; also a picture of a Nymph embraced by a Satyr. An Equipment of Cupid is in the Borghese palace : Venus is binding his eyes, whilst another amorino leans whispering over her shoulder, and two Graces bring the bow and quiver. Although somewhat mannered, and assimilating to the style of Paul Veronese, this picture is remarkable for the cheerful life and naivete wiiich pervades it. Three splendid pictures painted by Titian in 1514, for Alphonso Duke of Ferrara, represent larger mythological scenes in a rich landscape : two of them, the Arrival of Bacchus in the island of Naxos, and a Sacrifice to the Goddess of Fertility, are in the gallery at Madrid ; the third, Bacchus and Ariadne, is in the National Gallery at London. This is the most poetic and charming conception of the ancient myth, full of beauty and fancy, with severer and nobler forms than Titian's later works usually exhibit. Gio- vanni Bellini's already mentioned Bacchanalian scene with Titian's landscape is supposed to have been the fourth picture of this class. Another Bacchanalian scene, in the Madrid Gallery, is also of the highest beauty. It represents a party of youths and maidens, chiefly undraped, revelling in the open air — some drinking and singing, and others dancing in sjjortive groups. The only studied figure is a bacchantin sleeping in the foreground.' The celebrated Venus del Pardo, in the Louvre — properly speaking Jupiter (transformed into a Satyr) and Antiope — has been much injured, and is now chiefly dis- tinguished for its grand and beautiful landscape. A picture of the greatest power of this class is in the Munich Gallery ; 1 [This picture is one of the three painted for the Duke of Ferrara : con- sequently, the subject called by the author ' The An-ival of Bacchus in the Island of Naxos ' is either identical with it or with the ' Bacchus and Ariadne ' in the National Gallery. See Ridolfi, Le Meraviglie dell' Arte, p. 142.— Ed.] Chap. YIII. TITIAN. 447 ii represents Venus initiating- a young maiden into the mys- teries of Bacchus. The principal figures of this piece are repeated in several other pictures — for instance, in a picture in the Imperial Gallery at Vienna, representing the Marchese del Vasto with his mistress and other figures. Titian composed also many charming pictures in that romantic symbolical style which Giorgione had developed : one of them, called " The Three Ages," represents a young shepherd and a fair girl seated together on the grass, his hand resting on her shoulder, while she looks at him with an ex- pression of innocence and sweetness ; on one side are three winged children, two of them sleeping, the other just awakened ; in the distance an old man, surrounded with the bones of the dead. This is one of the most beautiful idyllic groups of modern creation, and the spectator involuntarily partakes of the dream-like feeling which it suggests. There are two original pictures of tliis scene : the one in the Bridgewater Gallery in London ; the other in the Manfrini palace at Venice. An excellent copy by Sassoferrato, but conceived in a very different spirit, is in the Borghese palace at Rome. The beautiful picture called "Sacred and Profane Love" is also in the Borghese Palace. Two female forms are seated on the edge of a sarcophagus-shaped fountain, the one in a rich Venetian costume, with gloves, flowers in her hands, and a plucked rose beside lier, is in deep meditation, as if resolving some difficult question. Tlie other is unclothed ; a red drapery is falling behind her, while she exhibits a form of the utmost beauty and delicacy ; she is turning towards tlie other figure with the sweetest persuasiveness of expression. A Cupid is playing in the fountain ; in the distance is a rich, glowing landscape. Finally, Titian may be considered as the finest portrait painter of all times. He was not content with giving his subjects all that was grand and characteristic in style : he also gave them the appearance of dignified ease. He seems to have taken them at the happiest moment, and thus has left us the true conception of the old Venetian, by the side of whom all modern gentlemen look poor and small. For however rich and gay the costume may be, it is the noble consciousness 448 MASTERS OF TUE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. of existence which engrosses our attention in such pictures. But it is his female portraits, above all, which are to be admired, especially those few which go by the name of " Titian's Mistress." That portrait known by this appella- tion in the Louvre is a specimen of the fullest and most lavish beauty. The same head is repeated with equal beauty in the so-called " Flora," in the Gallery of the Uffizj at Florence, who is represented with her golden tresses flowing loosely over her naked shoulders and bust, holding flowers in her right hand, and a piece of violet-coloured drapery in her left. His more proper portraits are '' La Bella di Tiziano," in the Pitti palace, a ripe beauty in a blue gold-embroidered dress, with violet and wliite padded sleeves and gold chain. Also another splendid serious beauty, known by the same name, in red and blue silk dress, in the Sciarra Gallery at Rome. The so-called Slave (a totally mnneaning name), in the Barberini palace at Rome, probably a mere school picture, of grand beauty, but with too clumsy a style of drajiery, too cold an expression, and too brown a carnation for Titian. We pass over numerous other female portraits. Of his family portraits the first in value is that of the family Cornaro kneeling before the Host, in the possession of the Duke of Nortlmmberland in London. His male portraits are so numerous in every gallery in Europe that it is difficult to name the most impor- tant. Li the Louvre we find the Marchese del Guasto with his mistress, to whom Cupid, Flora, and Zephyr are bringing gifts ; also King Francis I. (probably not from life, but from a medallion), and several others of the highest value. In the Manfrini palace at Venice, the portrait of Ariosto ; in the Barberigo Palace, Pope Paul III. ; in the gallery of the Uffizj at Florence, Cliarles Y. in armour, and a young warrior with others ; in the Pitti palace, Pietro Aretino (a repetition of the same is at Munich), Cardinal Ippolito di Medici, in a gorgeous Hungarian costume, and Philip II., a full-length figure; in the Corsini Palace at Rome, Philip IL, a half- length fig-ure, admirably conceived ; in the Colonna palace at Rome, Onofrius Panvinius ; in the Berlin Museum, the Ad- miral Moro, and others. Finally, we may mention the often repeated picture of Titian's daughter Lavinia. One of the Chap. VIII. TITIAN. 449 finest specimens is in the Berlin Museum. Here the beautiful and splendidly attired girl is holding up a plate of fruit. Other repetitions exist — one probably in Petersburg, another in the possession of Lord De Grey in London, where, instead of fruit, she is holding up a jewel casket ; a fourth is in the Madrid Gallery,' but Iiere it becomes an historical rep. r^'^nta- tion ; it is the daughter of Ilerodias, who carries the head n>i John the Baptist in a charger : the costume is treated with more freedom, the action is more impassioned, and the whole is strikingly poetical. In his " Nymph and Satyr," in the Barberigo palace, we recognize the same head. In his later works Titian is somewhat mannered ; he persevered in paint- ing even to extreme old age — slow to believe that his eye or mind had become weak. Even the frescoes from the life of St. Anthony, executed by himself and his pupils, in the so- called Scuola del Santo in Padua, bear the impress of his declining years. At the same time, even in his very latest productions, there is plenty that is admirable and little that is objectionable ; the diminution of his powers being less appa- rent in the mannerism of his forms than in the indecision of his composition. There is great animation in his Annuncia- tion, in S. Salvatore at Venice : the head of tlie angel — in character like that of a bold and beautiful youth — and the mirth of the cherubs in the heavenly glory, are all sufficient to make us overlook the very mediocre representation of the Virgin. The Transfiguration, in the same church, evinces also no want of power, nor even of strong emotion ; the forms only are more undecided. His latest work, not quite com- pleted by himself— a Descent from the Cross, in the Academy at Venice — shows certainly that his hand trembled beneath the weight of ninety and nine years ; but the conception of the subject is still animated and striking, the colours still glowing, while, Titian-like, the light still flows around the mighty group in every gradation of tone. It only belongs to us to point to that peculiar treatment of landscape by which Titian became the founder of a new ' See the author's Essay on these diftereiit represeutitions in the Museum, Blätter für bildende Kunst, 1833. No. 30. 450 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. school in this line.' A native of the Alps as he was, the mountains, villages, and trees of his own Friuli were often introduced into his glowing- pictures ; not that he aimed at the fantastic in style, like the old Netherlanders, but at the legitimately beautiful ; not at the quantitj^ of subject, like the early Florentines, but at the grand and the simple ; in his hands groups and colours became harmonious. His influence in this department probably informed the school of the Carracci, so that Poussin and Claude Lorraine may be considered as directly derived from him. Whether he ever treated land- scape as the principal subject we must leave undecided, but it is certain that in many of his pictures the figures are secondary in importance. A Preaching of John the Baptist, in Devon- shire House, in London, serves only as the basis on which he raises a richly poetical landscape with grand hilly forms. This great artist formed very fevv scholars, but had many imitators. They endeavoured to adopt his style, and if they have left no work of the highest rank, they were at least pre- served from the errors of mannerism by following nature in the path to which they were guided by him. Among these are many artists of his own family — his brother Francesco Vecellio, by whom is a clever altar-picture in Berlin ; his son Orazio Vecellio, a distinguished portrait-painter ; his nephew, the faithful companion of his journeys, Mai'co Vecellio, by whom are some tolerably good works in the palace of the Doge in Venice, and in S. Giovanni Elemosinario. Santo Zago also, and Girolamo di Tiziano, properly speaking Giro- lamo Dante, are good copyists of the master. Bonifazio Veneziano (1494-1563) is a dignified and able, tliough occasionally a somewhat mechanical painter of the Venetian school, and a good imitator of Titian. He is a proof ' [Landscape-painting in Italy, however independent in its perfection, appears in its origin to have been indebted, in more than one instance, to a German influence. Vasari distinctly says that Titian kept some German landscape-painters in his house, and studied with them for some months. In Bologna it is probable that Denys Calvart, a Flemish artist, first excited the emulation of the Carracci, Domenichino, and others, who, in the end, formed so distinguished a school of landscape-painters. In both these instances a certain i-esemblance to the German manner, however differently modified by the character of the schools, is to be recognized, especially in the umbellated treatment of the foliage. — Ed.] Chap. VIII. SCHOOLS OF VENICE. 451 of how much may be done with time and opportunity even with second rate talents. Venice is rich in his pictures. Among them, the most attractive, by their ability and un- affected treatment, are those of Saints simply arranged, and Holy Families. In larger compositions he does not suc- ceed ; they want both the truth and energy of Titian, and the permanent force of his colours. Still, his sacred subjects, of which a great number exist, please us by the multitude of their animated and agreeable forms, and here and there by their charming and romantic mode of treatment. As a specimen we may especiallj'^ mention " The Rich Man's Supper," in the Academy at Venice. Tlie time is the afternoon, the place an open hall, with a table, at which the rich man is seated between two female figures ; tlie one with her hand on her heart seems to be assuring him of her fidelity ; the other is listening thoughtfully to a lute player, and to a half-kneeling violoncellist, whose music is held by a Moorish boy ; while a bearded young noble overlooks the group. On the left are two pages drinking wine ; on the right Lazarus the beggar being turned away by a servant with a dog ; in the background is a stately garden, with falconers, pages, and grooms. Boni- fazio's latest pictures are one and all insipid and very man- nered. Andrea Schiavone is another good imitator of Titian. A beautiful Adoration of the Shepherds by him is in the Impe- rial Gallery at Vienna; also an excellent Madonna with Angels (whole length figures), in the Academy at Venice ; the Murder of Abel, a piece of fine foreshortening, with a beautiful wooded landscape, in the Pitti palace, and many others. His colouring is fine, but his heads are generally insipid, and his forms careless and undecided. A Christ before Pilate, in the Studj Gallery at Naples, is ascribed to Schia- vone ; it Is full of the defects we have mentioned ; the head of Pilate is, however, admirable — with his large glassy eyes he seems to ask " what is truth ?" Domenico Campagnola is also another good imitator of Titian ; his great talents excited the jealousy of the master. Four Prophets, half figures, by this artist, are in the Academy of Venice, and more important works are at Padua. Giovanni 452 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Cariani of Bergamo, originally a follower of Giorgione, de- serves honourable mention ; graceful pictures by him are to be seen in his native city. The most excellent is a Madonna, removed from S. Gottardo, in Bergamo, to the Milan Gallery during the French domination; we are uncertain if it still remains there. The Madonna sits in a landscape, with a rich tapestry, supported by two angels behind her ; a number of saints are on each side : simplicity of arrangement, and a pleasing clieerful character, distinguish this picture. Gero- nirao Savoldo of Brescia is a not less clever imitator of Titian. A beautiful Ailoration of the Shepherds, by him, is in the Manfrini Gallery in Venice ; also a finely painted, but other- wise unimportant Transfiguration in the Uffizj at Florence, — two holy hermits in the Manfrini Gallery; and a pleasing female figure in the Museum at Berlin. Still more important than all these, is Calisto Piazza of Lodi (see p. 231) ; a number of his works, representing the life of John the Baptist, are in the church " dell' Incoronata " at Lodi : in i^urity of senti- ment and depth of character they may vie with tlie finest works of the school. Some earlier paintings by him are at Brescia, in S. Maria di Calchera (in the sacristy of S. Clemente), which partake more of the Lombard style. His first principal picture in the Venetian style (in which the influence of Gior- gione is visible) is an excellent Assumption of the Virgin — 1533 — in the parish church at Codoguo. He afterwards resided some time in Spain. Alessandro Bonvicino of Brescia, commonly called II Moretto di Brescia (1500-1547), has a style of his own. He adhered at first closely to Titian's manner, but afterwards adopted much of the Eoman school, and by this means formed a mode of representation distinguished for a simple dignity, and tranquil grace and stateliness, which occasionally deve- loped itself in compositions of the very highest character. In such cases he evinces so much beauty and purity in his motives, and so much nobility and sentiment in his characters, that it is unaccountable how this master should, till within the last few years, have obtained little more than a local celebrity. His colouring is colder than that of most Venetian painters, but not less harmonious. He is most successful in tranquil Chap. Viri. SCHOOLS OF VENICE. 453 altar-pieces ; his talents not being adapted to the animation requisite for historical painting. He has left excellent works in his native city — an Assumption of the Virgin is in S. demente, a St. Joseph in S. Maria delle Grazie, and a beau- tiful Coronation of the Virgin in S. Nazario. Other works by him have also recently found their way to foreign coun- tries : a Madonna worshipped by two Saints was in the collec- tion of Mr. Solly in London -a Judith in the Hermitage at St. Petersburg, there unaccountably denominated a Raphael, is now ascribed to Moretto —a picture of the Virgin, as she is supposed to have appeared in Brescia, is in the possession of M. von Qnandt at Dresden. Far more remarkable, however, is the large altar-piece, now in the Stadel Institution at Frankfort, representing the tender and dignified figure of the Madonna enthroned between St. Antliony and an admirable St. Sebastian. In the Imperial gallery at Vienna is a St. Justina (there called a Pordenone), with the kneeling figure of Duke Hercules of Ferrara beside her. The countenance of the Saint is sweet, mild, and thoughtful, and the head of the Duke very fine. Two excellent pictures of Saints are also in the Louvre. Finally, the Berlin Museum possesses, besides a few smaller works by Moretto, a colossal Adoration of the Shepherds of great excellence ; also a large votive picture, which is one of the finest works of the master. The Virgin is seated above in the clouds, with the two children and St. Anna, surrounded with beautiful infant angels : this is perhaps the noblest representation of a Holy Family that the Venetian school produced. Two priests are kneeling below in profound devotion ; the one an amiable looking old man, the otlier a truly lofty figure, full of the intensest self- resignation ; a rich landscape forms tJie background. Moretto was distinguished by a childlike piety ; when painting the Holy Virgin he is said to have prepared himself by prayer and fasting. The celebrated portrait-painter Giovanni Battista Moroni was tlie scholar of this Moretto ; he flourished in the second half of the sixteenth century. His jiortraits are full of life, and are painted with great individual truth, but they are never conceived in an elevated feeling ; hence his figures are limited in their attitudes — just, in fact, as they sat to the 454 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. painter. Titian's portraits, on the contrary, are distinguished by the grandest picturesque roundness of composition and complete filling up of the space.' In his carnation Moroni has a certain tendency to violet tints, but is excellent in re- presenting all tlie various materials of dress, etc. His paint- ings are to be found in many galleries, the Venetian Academy, the Manfrini gallery in Venice, the Uffizj in Florence, etc. His own animated and interesting portrait is in the Berlin Museum. His portrait of a Jesuit in the Duke of Sutherland's gallery in Stafford House is a master-piece of art. In histo- rical pictures Moroni is unimportant. Contemporary with Moretto, in Brescia, flourished Girolamo, called II Romanino, an artist who likewise confined himself principally to the style of the Venetian school, but who modified it in a peculiar man- ner. While Moretto distinguished himself by simplicity and repose, Girolamo displays in his compositions a fantastic and lively imagination ; occasionally also a certain grandeur of pathos, the more striking from the simple and almost slight treatment of his details. Considerable works by this master occur in various places. The Sacristy of S. Justina at Padua contains a stately JNIadonna enthroned. A dead Christ with the group of mourners around (1510) is in the Manfrini palace at Venice. This is a truly grand work, conveying a touching expression of grief. In the Museum at Berlin there is an altar picture, with several saints and a great variety of acces- sories ; also a Descent from the Cross, from the Casa Brug- noli at Brescia, considered Romanino's chef-d' (xuvre ; a some- what coarse picture, but of striking power in conception and colour. Girolamo Muziano, a scholar of Romanino, was employed at a later period in Rome, where he became one of Michael Angelo's best imitators. At all events his chief picture, the Preaching of S. Jerome to his Monks in the Desert, in S. ' [The superiority of Titian to Moroni may be readily admitted, but in choice of attitude and the absence of constraint the latter must be allowed a high degree of merit. It would be difficult to select a more remarkable example of this kind of excellence than the portrait miscalled ' Titian's Schoolmaster,' in the gallery of the Duke of Sutherland. Ridolfi tells us that Titian was in the habit of recommending the distinguished inhabitants of Bergamo to sit to Moroni for their portraits. — Ed.] Chap. VIII. SCHOOLS OF VENICE. 455 Maria degli Angeli at Rome, is a work of excellent arrange- ment and admirable expression. Other productions of this painter are mannered in style. Another scholar of Romanino's, Lattanzio Gambara, is honourably distinguished by historians of art. His scholar, Giovita Bresciano, surnamed II Brescia- nino, was a clever painter in the later Venetian manner. Giovanni Antonio Licinio Regillo da Pordenone (1484- 1539), so called from his birth place, formed a manner in- dependent in a great degree of Giorgione and Titian, and was a decided rival of the latter. He rarely rises to an animated style of composition,' but generally confines himself, even where such a treatment is least appropriate, to a simple ar- rangement of figures. His heads seldom exhibit any impas- sioned expression. His particular excellence is the wonderful softness and tenderness (^morbidezza) with which he painted flesh : in this he is not surpassed even by Titian himself. He is distinguished in portrait-painting, and frequently introduces several heads into one picture ; that of his own family is in the Borghese palace in Rome. Another of Himself, with his Scholars, is in the Manfrini Palace in Venice. There are many excellent altar-pictures by Pordenone in Venice, particu- larly one in the Academy, a Madonna with Saints, very grace- ful and dignified. His celebrated S. Lorenzo Giustiniani attended by Saints, a much less important work, was formerly in S. Maria dell' Orto ; larger compositions by him are to be met with, for example, in S. Rocco in Venice — saints, with groups of indigent persons around them ; these, though exhi- biting more life and action, are somewhat mannered in parts : many more are in Venice and other parts of Lombardy. ' The Woman taken in Adultery,' in the Museum of Berlin, is a very celebrated picture of his ; not so much from its action or expression of emotion, as from the great truth of character in the heads. Two large pictures by Pordenone — the Finding of Moses and the Adoration of the Kings — are in Burleigh House, ' [This is hardly correct. In the town of Pordenone there are, or were a few years since, some veiy animated compositions by this artist, and he more than once painted the subject of Curtius leaping into the gulf on the outside of houses in and near his native place (see jManiago, .Storia delle Belle Arti Friulane). The picture which the author proceeds to mention, in the Borghese collection, is by Bernardo Licinio: the name is inscribed. — Ed.] 456 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. there erroneously imputed to Titian and to Bassano : they are rich compositions and noble in execution. A Christ washing the Feet of his Disciples, in the Berlin Museum, ap2)ears, on the other hand, to have been the Avork of his latest time. The incident is very superficially conceived, and the execution very slight. Bernardino Licinio was the scholar and relation of Por- denone : he was similar in style, but generally less noble in his heads. A good altar-piece by him is in S. Maria de' Frari in Venice ; admirable portraits are in the Berlin Museum. Other scholars are Calderari, an excellent imitator of Porde- none, and Pomponio Amalteo, his son-in-law. An excellent fresco picture by this latter, representing the apocryphal story of Trajan and the Widow, is at Ceneda, near Belluno. Other works of the kind by him are in the neighbourhood. A second painter, equally distinguished in his portraits, is Paris Bordone (1500-1570): he also took a peculiar path. He formed himself on Giorgione's works, but avoided his severity ; adopting afterwards so much of Titian's manner that his works might often bear that master's name. He is remark- able for a delicate rosy colouring, wliich indeed sometimes borders on effeminacy. His female portraits, of which there are many in the galleries of Munich, in the Belvedere and Esterhazy galleries in Vienna, the Manfrini collection in Venice, the Uffizj in Florence, &c., are sweet and graceful, althou'^h not very intellectual in conception. Like Porde- none, he is unimportant in large compositions ; his altar pieces, chiefly Madonnas with Saints, have something of the spirited excitement of Correggio, only without his naivete ; his heads are excellent. Two pictures of this description are in the Berlin Museum. His most celebrated picture is in the Aca- demy of Venice, and alludes to the Tempest, by Giorgione, already described. Here the fisherman, who was present when the saints stilled the tempest, presents a ring to the Doge, which he had received from S Mark as a pledge of the patron saint's gracious disposition towards Venice. The picture is rich in figures, simple, but of no great power ; the splendid execution, however, gives it the most attractive air of truth, to which the view of the grand Venetian buildinsrs much contri- Chap. VIII. SCHOOLS OF VEXICE. 457 bates. The most significant picture of Bordone's is perhaps the Tibiirtine Sibyl. An altar is still burning on which Au- gustus has offered up his fruitless sacrifices, while tlie sibyl, a female of the most beautiful Titian type, stands before him and his followers, pointing in the distance to the new-born Saviour. In colouring also, this picture is one of the master's chef-d'ceuvres. His celebrated Paradise, also in the Academy, formerly in the churcli of Ognissanti, at Treviso, is very feeble. His small pictures, sucli as a Madonna with the Child and Mary Magdalene, in the Manfrini palace, and a Riposo durino- tiie Flight into Egypt, in the Pitti palace, are more pleasing. Another representation of this subject is in the Bridgewater Gallery. We conclude this account of the Venetian artists who flourished toward the middle of the sixteenth century with Battista Franco, il Semolei, who studied in Rome, and is classed among the imitators of Michael Angelo. In the small number of his works existing in Venice, he appears as a moderate follower of the Florentine or Roman style, which he combines well with that of Venice. He is particularly pleasin"- in small decorations in the compartments of ceilings, as in the Scala d'Oro of the Palace of the Doge, and in a chapel of S. Francesco della Vigna, at Venice. In larger works (the most important are in this same chapel) he is more maimered. An excellent portrait of Sansovino, by him, is in the Berlin Museum. The school of Venice continued to flourish, and to retain a real and vital originality, for a much longer period than anv other school in Italy. This superiority is to be attributed on the one hand to certain favourable external circumstances, and on the other to the healthful principle of the school, viz., the study and imitation of nature. It cannot be said that the artists of the second half of the century, wdiom we now pro- ceed to consider, equalled in their collective excellence the great masters of the first, but in single instances they are fre- quently entitled to rank beside tliem. At the head of these is .Jacopo Robusti, surnamed, from his father's trade, Tintoretto (the dyer), (1512—1594). He was one of the most vigorous painters that the history of art X 459 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. exhibits ; one who sought rather than avoided the greatest difficulties, and who possessed a true feeling for animation and grandeur. If his works do not always please, it must be imputed to the foreign and non- Venetian element which he adopted, but never completely mastered, and to the times in which he lived. In our next chapter we shall say more on this head : here it is sufficient to remark that Venetian art had fallen into the mistaken path of colossal and rapid productive- ness, and that Tintoretto was the painter who paid tlie greatest penalty for this taste. His off-hand style, as we may call it, is, it is true, always full of grand and meaning detail : with a few patches of colour he expresses sometimes tlie liveliest forms and expressions ; but he fails in that artistic arrange- ment of the whole, and in that nobility of motives in parts, which are necessary exponents of a high idea. His composi- tions are not expressed by finely studied degrees of participa- tion in the principal action, but by great masses of liglit and shade. Attitudes and movement are taken immediately from common life, not chosen from the best models. With Titian the highest idea of earthly happiness in existence is expressed by beauty ; with Tintoretto in mere animal strength, some- times of a very rude character. The manner in which Tintoretto formed his peculiar style, resulted from the reproach at that time cast upon the Venetian school. He was for a short time in the school of Titian, but not continuing on good terms with his master, he soon quitted him, in order to follow a path of study of his own. In the painting-room which he occupied in his youth he had inscribed, as a definition of the style lie professed, " The drawing of Michael Angelo, the colouring of Titian." Pie copied the works of the latter, designed from casts of the Florentine and from antique sculpture, par- ticularly by lamplight, to exercise himself in a more forcible style of relief ; he made models for his works, which he ligiited artificially, or hung up in his room, in order to make himself master of perspective appearances, so little attended to by the Venetians. By these means he united great strength of shadow with the Venetian colouring, which gives a peculiar character to his pictures, and is very success- Chap. YIII. SCHOOLS OF VENICE. 459 fill when limited to the direct imitation of nature. But setting- aside the impossibility of combining- two such totally diflerent excellences as the colouring of Titian and the drawing of Michael Angelo, it appeal's that Tintoretto's acquaintance with the works of the last-named master only develojied his tendency to a naturalistic style. That which with Michael Angelo was the symbol of a higher power in Nature, was adopted by Tintoretto in its literal form. Michael Angelo made use of naked figures in his Last Judgment to express the artistic and poetic thought with abstract largeness. Tin- toretto introduces them as mere idle accompaniments, for the sake of their fine muscular drawing or foreshortening. The works, even of his better time, are generali}^ slight in treat- ment ; later they became unmeaning in invention, and coarse and mechanical in execution. Added to this, a premature darkening of the colours has lowered most of his pictures. Under tiiese circumstances it is not surprising that Tinto- retto's portraits should be found invariably belonging to the better class of his works. Here his conception is free, and even grand, and generally combined with a purer and more careful execution. Three admirable portraits are in the Berlin Mu- seum, and that of a bald-headed man with a beard is in the Louvre. Several are in English galleries, and among them two Dukes of Ferrara, with servants and pages, offering up their devotions in a church, in the collection at Castle Howard. Next to these in interest are those of his historical pictures (chiefly dating from his earlier time) in which he has intro- duced a rich poetical landscape. A Sacrifice of Isaac, and a Temptation of Christ, are in Castle Howard ; a party of Musicians, in the Gallery of the Duke of Sutherland, in Lon- don. Altogether the earlier pictures by Tintoretto are not only more glowing in colour, but of a finer and more naive composition ; for instance the subject of Vulcan, Venus, and Cupid, in the Pitti Palace. The same remarks apply to his sacred subjects: the Birth of the Virgin, with a glory of angels above, in the sacristy of S. Zaccaria at Venice. An altaipiece in S. Giovamii e Paolo, the Madonna with saints, and kneeling senators ; another in the Venetian Academy ; and others elsewhere. AUo a .spiritedly conceived Adoration of X 2 4f)0 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. the Shepherds, at Castle Howard, and a fine Entombment of Christ, in the Bridgewater Gallery. Among his most cele- brated but, notwithstanding the excellence of colour and animation of composition, not his most pleasing pictures, is the Miracle of St. Mark, who rescues a tortured slave from the hands of the heathen, in the Academy at Venice: and a large Crucifixion, painted 1565, in the school of S. Roceo. This building, as well as the palace of the Doge, possesses a large number of his works.' In the latter there is also a remarkable representation of Paradise, seventy-four feet long, and thirty feet high, painted in oil, like almost all Tintoretto's works. ^ It is in the greater council chamber, now the library, and contains an innumerable and unplea.sant throng of liuman figui'es ; each group apparently alike distant from tlie eye. and therefore in no way standing out from the re.st. ]\Iany of the figures, however, display much skill ; and those of Christ and the Virgin are fine and dignified. (A small and admir- able sketch of this picture by Tintoi-etto's own hand is in the Louvre.) Four good mythological pictures are also in the saloon of the Anti-collegio, in the Doge's palace. On the other hand specimens of Tintoretto's most corrupt style may be seen in two enormous pictures — a Last Judgment, and the Adoration of the Golden Calf, in S. Älaria dell' Orto ; and in a Last Supper in S. Trovaso. Nothing more utterly dero- gatory both to the dignity of art and to the nature of the subject can be imagined than the treatment of the Last Supper. St. John is seen, with folded arms, fast asleep, whilst others of the Apostles, with the most burlesque ges- tures, are asking " Lord! is it I?" Another Apostle is uncovering a dish which stands on the floor, without re- marking that a cat has stolen in and is eating from it. A ' [Reckoning the pictiu'es in the ceilings (but without reckoning some heads in the angles), there are ßfii/scrm works by this astonishing painter in the .Scuola di S. liocco alone ; the greater part are very large, and the figures throughout are the size of life. The Crucifixion is a most extensive work, and, all things considered, perhaps the most peifect by the master. — Ed.] - [Boschini (Rieche Minere, &c., ed. 1674) mentions some frescoes bv Tintoret of considerable extent at the Campo de' Gesuiti ; others at the Serviti ; others on a house in the Sestier del Castello. Those on the exterior of the Pallazzo Gussoni are engraved by Zanetti (Varie Pitture a fresco de' principali maestri Veneziani. A^en. 1760.) — Ed.] Chap. VIII. SCHOOLS OF VEXICE. 401 second is reaching towards a flask ; a beggar sits by, eating. Attendants, with page and maid-servant, fill up the picture. To judge from an overthrown chair, the revel seems to have been of the lowest description. It is strange that a painter should venture on such a representation of this subject scarcely a hundred years after the creation of Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper. Among the scholars and imitators of Tintoretto, his son Domenico Tintoretto, and Jacob Kotteiihanmier, a German, may be honourably mentioned. Another scholar, Antonio Vascibracci, called 1' Aliense, transplanted the style of this master to the quiet city of Perugia, having executed ten large wall pictures for the church of S. Pietro there. Several contemporaries of Tintoretto flovirished in Verona ; they stand in close relation to the school of Venice. Their principal pictures are to be seen in the churches, and in the gallery of the Palazzo del Consiglio, in Verona. To these belong Niccolo Giolfino, whose figures unite a peculiar grandeur with an expression of engaging gentleness. — Giambattista dal Moro, a scholar of Torbido, called II Moro (already men- tioned among the followers of Giorgione) : his pictures are impassioned, but somewhat exaggerated. — Domenico Kicci, called Brusasorci, more celebrated in Verona than the last named, but a mediocre artist, though generally clever in execution. — Paolo Farinato, sometimes grand, and the wor- thiest predecessor of Paolo Veronese, of whom we are about to speak. Farinato, though not always free from exaggera- tion, is clever and powerful, and is pleasing from his truth of imitation. All these artists, and Tintoretto himself, are excelled by Paolo Cagliari of Verona, surnamed Veronese (1528 — 1588).^ He lived chiefly in Venice, and formed himself, particularly in colouring, after Titian. It is true he did not equal that master in the perfection of his flesh tones, but by splendour of colour, a-ssisted by rich draperies and other materials, by a very clear and transparent treatment of the shadows, by com- prehensive keeping and harmony, Paolo infused a magic into his pictures which surpasses almost all tlie other masters of ' Outlines in Landon, Vies et Qiuvres, etc., t. Paolo Veronese. 462 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. the Venetian school. Never had the pomp of colour been so exalted, so glorified, as in his works ; his paintings are like full concerts of enchanting music. This, his peculiar quality, is most decidedly and grandly developed in scenes of worldly splendour ; he loved to paint festive subjects for the refectories of rich convents, suggested of course from par- ticular passages in the Scriptures, but treated with the gi-eatest freedom, especially as regards the costume, which is always that of the artist's time. In these and similar examples Ave have the most beautiful display of grand architecture, the splendour of the precious metals in vases and so forth, the most brilliant and gorgeous costume ; abo^e all, a powerful and noble race of Imman beings, elate witli the consciousness of existence, and in full enjoyment of all that reuders earth attractive. Instead of any religious interest, we are pre- sented with a display of the most cheerful human scenes and the richest worldly splendour. That which distinguishes Paul Veronese from Tintoretto, and which, in his later period, after the death of Titian and Michael Angelo, earned for him the rank of the first living master, was that beautiful vitality, that poetic feeling which, as far as it was possible, he infused into a sunken period of art. At the same time he adopted in many respects the naturalistic tendencies with wliich he was surrounded, so that his compositions may be occasionally said to run wild. The beauty of his figures is more addressed to the senses than to the soul, though even the most superficial of his innumerable works have a breath of gi'ace and a plenitude of life which at that time had entirely departed from the other schools. In his later works, however, his colouring is sallow and negative, and is rendered even inharmonious by the introduction of a fiery red. Of the earlier pictures of this master not many are known. An excellent picture in the Berlin Museum, by an unknown hand, is painted in what we may conceive to have been Paul Veronese's youthful style. It represents the Madonna and Child enthroned, with angels and saints before her, and others hastening to her ; with St. Sebastian on the left, fastened to a tree. This last, with the infant Christ, and one angel, are the finest figures in the picture, many single portions Chap. VIIT. SCHOOLS OF VENICE. 463 of which, as well as the excellent harmony of colouring-, un- doubtedly indicate Paul Veronese, while other parts remind us of Giorgione, and the St. Sebastian of Pordenone. Other altarpieces occur in Venice and elsewhere ; one of the best, in S. Francesco della Vig-na, is further interesting, as being a specimen of that latest style of composition for altarpieces which subsequently was adopted by the Netherlandish school. The Holy Family is above upon a terrace; St. Anthony is seen below, turning towards the spectator, his pig at his side ; a female martyred saint seated by him is gazing upwards. A Resurrection of Christ, in the same chiu'ch, is of later and slig liter execution ; the perplexity of the guards is, however, excellent ; one of them is aiming blindly at Christ with his halberd. A Marriage of St. Catherine in the church of the same name is of tiie finest and most animated composition, and excellent in execution. A large Coronation of the Virgin, with a whole crowded paradise full of saints, in the Academy, is one of his late off-hand pictures. A very pleasing picture by Paul Veronese was in the collection of Signor Craglietto in Venice ; it represents the Madonna and Child, with Venice, characterized as a beautiful young Dogaressa, kneeling before them. Many of this master's pictures are in the Brera at Milan, and in the Louvre. The church of S. Sebastiano at Venice, where Paul Vero- nese lies buried, contains the best specimens of his historical pictures, in the closer sense of the word. Of the innumerable works of his hand with which the walls and altars of this church are decorated we can only mention the most sig- nificant ; and, first of all, the three very large pictures, representing the Death of St. Sebastian, executed (1560- 1565) with the greatest care and with all the splendour of his colouring. The finest of these, representing the Saint going to the place of his maityrdom, belongs to the year 1565. The scene is upon a flight of steps before a house: St. Sebastian, a fine, powerful figure, is hastening down them, while at the same time he turns to his fellow suflferers Marcus and Marcellinus, who follow him, bound, and points towards heaven with an inspired look. One of them is gazing on him with the profoundest faith, the other is looking round at his 464: MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. sorrowing mother, who seeks to turn him from his purpose with her entreaties and reproaches. On the right a grey- headed father is ascending the steps, led by youtlis ; women and children also endeavour to intercept the martyrs, but these continue the path that leads to death with the noblest tranquillity. Innumerable figures are seen on balustrades and roofs, clinging to pillars, and crowded on the stairs, looking on in the greatest excitement. This picture displays a beauty of composition, a richness without an overcrowding of subject, and a power of expression and colour which in some respects entitles it to be considered the noblest of Paul Veronese's works. The two other pictures represent St. Sebastian pierced with arrows, and stretched upon the rack. The first is of the finest invention and execution. Tiie saint, bound to a column, is looking longingly towards heaven, where the Madonna appears accompanied by beautiful angels ; next the saint are two splendid female figures, also praying to the heavenly vision ; further below are three kneeling saints who regard the martyr with looks of astonishment. ]n the last picture it was not possible for the painter to idealize the horror of the scene, so that, in spite of its masterly con- ception, it does not stand comparison with the other two. The large wings of the organ, paintetl about 1560, contain, on the outer side, a beautiful reprejentatiou of the Temple ; on the inner side the miracle of the pool of Bethesda ; the last again one of the most admirable of the master's pro- ductions. The lame and sick, seated along an arcade, are connected with the utmost skill in one group. An old man upon crutches is pointing with eager gestures to Christ, who has just healed a cripple by the power of his word ; behind, the Apostles are helping others of the healed out of the water. Among the ceiling pictures of this churcli the Crowning of Esther by Ahasuerus is the best. In other historical pictures his romantic tendency is here and there happily displayed : for instance, in a Baptism of Christ, and the Adoration of the Wise Men, in the Brera at Milan ; in the Finding of Moses, and in the Centurion of Capernaum, in the Dresden Gallery ; and in many others, especially in the Turin Gallery. In many of these compositions we miss that Chap. Vnr. SCHOOLS OF VENICE. 465 which most Venetian masters are deficient in, namely, the strict relation of the subordinate allusions to the principal subject, and the careful arrangement of the groups ; but this quality was at that time departing even from the Roman school. Here we must also mention the almost innumerable mythological and allegorical pictures with which Paul Vero- nese, in his latter years, adorned the walls and ceilings of the Doge's palace and of other buildings. If, with many beauties to rivet the eye, we here miss the purity of form and the noble conception which Titian bestowed even on the most earthly subjects, we must lay the blame in great measure on the patron, who, according to the taste of the day, was insatiable in allegory of every description, and tlms compelled the painter to the adoption of that naturalistic style wliich was necessary to infuse freshness into such subjects. At the same time Ave have the well-known Rape of Proserpine, in the Anti-collegio, and also Venice crowned by Fame, on the ceiling of the Hall del Maggior Consiglio, both represented in a manner which touches the heart of the spectator like heroic music. Paul Veronese's great reputation rests, however, principally on his generally colossal representations of festive meetings. The most celebrated of these pictures is the Marriage of Cana, in the Louvre, thirty feet wide, by twenty feet high, formerly in the refectijry of S. Giorgio Maggiore, at Venice. The scene is a brilliant atrium, surrounded by majestic pillars. The tables at which the guests are seated form three sides of a parallelogram : the guests are supposed to be almost entirely contemporary portraits, so that the figures of Christ and the Virgin, of themselves sufficiently insignificant, entirely sink in comparison. Servants with splendid vases are seen in the foreground, with people looking on from raised balustrades, and from the loggie and roofs of distant houses. The most remarkable feature is a group of musicians in the centre in front, round a table ; also portraits — Paul Veronese himself is playing the violoncello, Tintoretto a similar instrument, the grey-haired Titian, in a red damask robe, the contra-bass. Another somewhat smaller representation of the same subject, full of new and spirited motives, is in the Brera at Milan ; a third in the Dresden Gallery. Comparable in size and rich- X 3 4GG MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. ness, but not in excellence, with the picture in the Louvre, we may mention the Feast of the Levite, in the Academy at Venice (formerly in the refectory of S. Giovanni e Paolo). Tliis is also a gigantic composition, beneatli an airy arcade, which divides the whole into three groups, with a town view behind. The chief incident is also made subordinate here, while on the other hand we have a number of the most ciiarm- ing episodes : the halberdiers hastily swallowing down their portion of the feast upon the stairs ; the majordomo speaking with a Moorish servant, &c. Christ at tlie table of Simon the Publican, with the Magdalen washing his feet — another scarcely less gigantic picture in the Louvre — is much simpler in arrangement than other works of this order, and is distin- guished by fine heads, and especially by a very noble Christ. Another representation of this subject is in the Brera at Milan ; a tliird, in the Marcello Durazzo palace, at Genoa, The Supper at Emmaus also often occurs ; for instance, in the Louvre and in the Dresden Gallery. After the master's death his heirs finished several festive pictures of this kind after his designs, though of course they are deficient in that fulness of life which forms the pervading character of his original works. A somewhat empty " Pharisee's Feast," of this kind, is in the Academy at Venice.' Finally, we may observe that Paul Veronese's portraits, which occur bvit seldom, are of high merit. His scholars, and the emulators of Iiis manner, are veiy inferior to him. Among them are Carlo Cagliari, his son, and Battista Zelotti. A large Presentation in the Temple, by the latter, whicli does not fall far short of similar pictures by Paul Veronese himself, is in the Berlin Museum. While the application of the Venetian principle — the imita- tion of nature — had given so peculiar a direction to Paolo Veronese's style, it was to be expected that some would seek to render Nature even in her commonest aspects, and that thus genre, as it is called, would also be cultivated. This accord- ingly took place in the school of the Bassani : its founder and • It is not in oiu- power to give any account of the historical frescoes wJiich Paul Veronese and his scholars executed in the Castle of Cattajo near Padua. Chap. YIII. SCHOOLS OF VEXICE. 467 chief master was Jacopo da Ponte (1510 — 1592), surnamed Bassano, from his native town ; he studied the works of Titian and Bonifazio in Venice, and at first practised in the manner of these masters. He afterwards returned to his native place,. a small country town, whose environs appear to have first suggested his particular st\'le of composition. He selected those subjects in which he could most extensively introduce landscape and cottages, peasants and tlie lower classes of people. Tiiese he connected with events either from sacred history or mythology,' or often, without any particular refer- ence to history, represented simple scenes of country life — cattle, marlcets, etc. Sometimes he omitted figures altogether, and introduced buildings, with animals, instruments of agri- culture, kitchen utensils, and still life. These works show little variety of invention ; when we have seen a few, we may be said to be acquainted with all that are in the various galleries : the countenances, too, are all alike ; one of his daugliters is at one time the queen of Sheba, at another a Magdalene, or again a peasant-girl wdth poultry. A peculiar feature by which Bassano and his school may be known is the invariable and intentional hiding of the feet, for which purpose cattle and household utensils (old pots and pans, «fee.) are introduced. For the rest, the humorous rather than sentimental treatment which gives its charm to the lower genre is almost wanting in the works of Bassano : for instance, the otherwise excellent Family Concert, in the Gallery of the Uffizj, is far too serious in conception as compared with the character of the forms. Bassano confines himself to a bold, straightforward imitation of familiar objects, united, however, with pleasing grouping and an attractive play of light and colour. The chief interest of his pictures consists in the last- named quality. His colours sparkle like gems, particularly the greens, in which he displays a brilliancy quite peculiar to himself. His lights are boldly impinged on the objects, and are seldom introduced except on prominent parts of figures, 1 [The figures in some of Giacomo Eassano's subjects are treated with sufficient dignity : the Good Samaritan, in the collection of Mr. Rogers, is an example. Among his finest works may be mentioned St. Martin dividing his Cloak with the Beggar, and the Baptism of Sta. Lucilla, the fonner in the Municipalitä, the latter in the church of S. Valentino at Bassano. — Ed.] 468 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CEXTUKY. Bof.k V. on the shoulders, knees, elbows, etc. In accordance with this treatment, his handling is spirited and peculiar, somewhat in the manner of Rembrandt ; and what, on close inspection, appears confused, forms at a distance the very strength and magic of his colouring. That Bassano also should, generally speaking, most excel in portraits, will not surprise the reader. An old man in the Berlin Museum, and a richly dressed female in the Studj Gallery at Naples, would do honour to Tintoretto. There are also several sacred subjects existing in which Bassano deve- loped a greater dignity, and finer and more noble forms : for instance, the Mourning Marys, at Chiswick ; a Christ bearing his Cross, at Holkham ; a Crucifixion in the Berlin Museum. But his cabinet pictures are the most numerous. These are works of various dimensions, whicli are rarely wanting, at least not in Italian galleries ; but they are not all genuine. He had a regular manufactory for such works, in which he was assisted by his four sous, who had acquired his manner. Two of them, Francesco and Leandro, also painted church subjects, but not with much success. One of Francesco's best works is among the ceiling paintings of the Doge's palace at Venice (Sala dello Scrutinio), and represents the taking of Padua by night. An Ascension, over the high altar, in S. Luigi de' Francesi at Rome, is also not without merit. A good picture by Leandro, representing the Trinity, is in S. Giovanni e Paolo, in Venice ; also a Raising of Lazarus, in the Academy, and a repetition in the Studj Gallery at Naples, in which the figures, though somewhat mechanically arranged, are upon the whole finely painted and full of expression. It is true the astonishment of the bystanders is directed more to Lazarus than to Christ — a remark which we are the more tempted to make because it applies to many pictures of this later Venetian school. In their great manual skill, and in their reliance on a close imitation of Nature, they gradually omitted to give due prominence to those higher allusions which belong to subjects of this class. Chap. IX. DECLINE OF AET — THE MANNERISTS. 469 CHAPTER IX. DECLIiSE OF ART. THE MANNERISTS. The most brillianl period of Italian art, that whicli embraces the life of Raphael, resulted from a combination of numerous influences, from within and without, of the most varied kind. To describe the rapid decline and dispersion of the same in all its bearings, would be an historical task of no small extent. We must therefore content ourselves with merely giving- the necessary heads. As regards the middle of the sixteenth century, no imme- diate influence from the great historical events of the time — • the Reformation, the great supremacy of Spain, &c. — can be admitted ; or if so, only in a very limited degree. It was not till a later period, about the beginning of the seventeenth century, that these and similar causes began to operate on art. The means of education which existed about the year 1550 differed doubtless in many respects from those of Raphael's time ; but the subjects of art, and the demand for her produc- tions, continued essentially the same ; the latter only increasing in amount. Let us rather seek for the causes of change in that necessary condition of all things in this world, to rise, flourish, and to decline, from which no period of art is exempt. In that of which we are treating, the decline may be traced in increasing rapidity from about the year 1530; so that most of the scholars of the great masters, indeed some of tlieir own later works, are not exempt from its influence. The following is a resume, of the features indicative of this decline, which were common to the schools of all the great masters ; and if we here introduce a number of painters who are known as especial mannerists, it does not at all follow that their works are in- ferior to many by Giulio Romano, and the nearest scholars of Michael Angelo. The decline of art stands in immediate connexion with the unrivalled glories of the Raphaelesque period. A climax of excellence was felt to have been attained ; and it was now the 470 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. general aim to hold fast, if not to surpass, that effect in the great works of art which appeared to have earned for their authors their universal reputation. No one remembered that the foundation of all artistic greatness depended on the myste- rious harmony between the personality of the painter and his subject. The external signs of the great masters, their effect and manner were the objects of imitation, first with due modesty, and then with gradually increasing boldness, till they led to the greatest exaggerations. That which was overlooked was certainly tliat which was least susceptible of imitation, viz., the deep poetic intention, the noble and harmonious con- ception, and that arrangement which was dictated by the highest laws. Many of the painters in question would, fifty years earlier, have done great things ; now they fell into re- pulsive mannerism, because no longer supported by those principles of harmony and beauty which, at the beginning of the sixteenth century, had inspired even mediocre talent to truly great works. AVhere immediate truth of nature Avas required, as, for instance, in portraits, great excellence was however displayed. A considerable share of the blame must be imputed to the altered tastes of the patron, and to the consequent change in the external position of the painter. Tempted by the splendid productions of Raphael's time, princes and corporations now tliirsted for the possession of vast works of an elevated kind, which thus soon became objects of luxury wliich every one sought to obtain according to his rank and means. That such luxuries should be sought for also at the least possible expen- diture of time or money was also natural, and as in point of allegorical or historical representation a lower order of con- ception was preferred to the really high and infinite in art, it followed that the superficial and ready handed painter invari- ably took precedence of him who possessed deeper and more lasting qualities. It is melancholy to observe how from this time painters and patrons contributed more and more to de- moralize each other ; the one playing the part of a courtier and an intriguant, the other that of a capricious master. The most enormous undertakings were now executed with the greatest rapidity. " We paint," as Vasari says, " six pictures Chap. IX. DECLINE OF ART — THE MANNERISTS. 471 in a year, while the earlier masters took six years to one picture ;" and how colossal these pictures are we see in the Sala Regia in the Vatican, and in the great saloon in the Ducal Palace at Florence ; while he naively adds, " And yet these pictures are much more perfectly executed than those of the early school by the most distinguished masters." (Preface to the Third Part of his Biographies.) According to his letters Vasari seems to have used his hands as actively in his picture of the Sea-fight at Lepanto. as if he had been himself engaged in the contest, and the greater the speed at which he painted the more does he seem convinced of the superiority of his powers. Thus thought also most of the popular painters of that time, and if we here and there find cause to admire their works, in spite of the false conditions under which they were produced, it is only a further proof of the greatness of that period which preceded them. That the same corrupt taste which governed the larger and monumental department of art should also extend to the class of easel pictures was in- evitable ; nay, the miion of intrinsic nothingness with the more careful outAvard execution is still more displeasing in effect, except where a happy turn for natural imitation gave such works a conditional value. In this part of the history of art a certain general flatness of style, chiefly proceeding from reminiscences of a Michael Angelesque and Eaphaelesque character, makes it difficult to enter into a classification of schools. The venerable Michael Angelo himself lived deep into the degenerate period ; how far he countenanced it was perhaps unknown to Vasari. In order now to do justice to the painters we are about to review, we must give a short summary of the fate of those schools we have already des^cribed. Those which fared the worst were the descendants of the ancient and less developed schools where the influence of the old masters had been im- perfectly transplanted, such as the latest Peruginese painters, the Alfani, Adone Doni, and others, whose Avorks, by the union of ancient and modern faults, are sometimes peculiarly unsatisfactory. Parallel Avith these are certain Netherlandish 472 MASTERS OF TUE SIXTEEN"TH CENTURY. Book V. artists of the Roman school, though these, upon the whole, are not so deficient in external means of representation. Then follow the last Leonardists in Milan, Lanini, Loniazzo, Figino, and others, who certainlj^ confine themselves within modester bounds than the followers of Michael Angelo, but are not the more grateful to the eye. Next come the schools of the scholars of Raphael, that of Giulio Romano, and particularly the Genoese school of Perin del Vaga, with the offset of the former at the French court. These ran utterly wild ; Poli- doro, on the other hand, took refuge in an empty natu- ralism, though, as regards Naples, this may be said to have contained a germ of future life. The scholars of Correggio, not to mention the last dregs of the school of Ferrara, are proverbially known as mannei'ists. As a relief to all this the school of Venice, with the works of Paul Veronese and the better productions of his contemporaries, may be seen enjoying a second yoiith. During and after this period the following painters were prominent. The imitation of Michael Angelo became the first oljiject of the Florentines. His grandeur was imposing, but it required much more than a mere habit of copying to comprehend his powerful spirit. Moreover, Florence possesses little of Michael Angelo if we except his works in sculpture ; the greater jmrt of these ai'e not free from affectation, but these were the works from which the Florentines chiefly studied : they sought to imitate the muscular markings displayed by violent move- ments, without being sufficiently grounded in the necessary theoretical knowledge. Thus they were betrayed into nume- rous errors : sometimes marking the muscles with equal force in repose and in action, in delicate and in powerful forms. Satisfied with this supposed grandeur of style, they troubled themselves little for the rest. Many of their pictures consist of a multitude of figures, one over the other, so that it is im- possible to say what part of the ground-plan they occupy ; fio-ures which tell nothing — half-naked models in academic positions. Heavy colours thinly applied, and defective mo- delling, supersede the early energetic execution. The more important of these artists are : Giorgio Vasari, of Arezzo (1512-1574), an artist of versa- Chap. IX. DECLINE OF ART— THE MANXERIST.S. 473 tile talent — historical painter and architect : he superintended several buildings, and directed their embellishments : Florence, Arezzo, Rome, Naples, are rich in the works of his rapid hand. In Rome he took chief part in the decoration of the already mentioned Sala Regia in the Vatican, where the Popes formerly gave audience to foreign ambassadors. Here, as once before in tlie apartments of this same palace, the triumphs of the Church were the subjects ; no longer, how- ever, by means of lofty and moral symbols and allusions, but by direct heavy matter-of-fact representations in large over- laden pictures of battles and ceremonies. Instead, therefore, of enumerating the many other unsatisfactory colossal pictures by Vasari, we may mention his excellent portrait of liOrenzo de' Medici in the gallery of the Uftizj at Florence, and the frecpiently repeated one of Cosimo I. in the Berlin Museum and other galleries. Vasari's greatest merit consists in his literary labours : his biographical account of the artists (Vite de' piü eccellenti Pittori, Scultori ed Architetli), which he published in 1550, and in a second improved edition in 1568, was the first important work on the history of modern art, without which our whole knowledge of single masters and of the development of schools would be poor and fragmentary. Numerous omissions and chronological mistakes demand a very accurate criticism, but, upon the whole, considered as the first comprehensive \\ork of this kind, compiled chiefly from verbal tradition, it is singularly worthy of confidence. Added to this we remark a great fairness of tone, which, in a painter living in the midst of various pursuits and contending interests, and in a scholar of the most exclusive of all masters, is no slight merit. Finally, the style in which he wi'ites has made the history of art agreeable to all readers, and given an incalculable interest to the subject. Vasari's descriptions are often of the greatest beauty and liveliness, and his anecdotes invaluable in the history of men and manners. Francesco de' Rossi, surnamed ' de' Salviati ' after his patrons, a friend of Vasari, and allied to him in style. Angiolo Bronzino, another intimate friend of Vasari, an imitator of Pontormo, whom he resembles in portraits, but his colouring is often inferior — sometimes leaden, sometimes 474 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. clialkj'-, with a red that looks like rouge. A Descent of Christ into Hell, tliough cold, is carefully painted and not o\er mannered. In the Berlin Museum there is a good family portrait, a portrait of Bianca Capella, and several others. Alessandro Allori, nephew and scholar of Bronzino : with exception of a few delicate and careful portraits, he is suffi- ciently mediocre. Santi Titi or di Tito, also a scholar of Bronzino, occasionally less mannered. Battista Naldini, Bernardino Barbacelli, called Poccetti, and others. The second period of Florentine art attached itself later to the better productions of this school. The general corruption of the mannerists did not extend to the Sienese in an equal degree ; Arcangiolo Salimbeni, Fran- cesco Yanni, Domenico Manetti, and others, often display some cleverness in this degenerate period, with an ingenuous adlierence to nature, although they never rise to the simplicity of the earlier masters. One of the most spirited adherents and imitators of Michael Angelo is Marco di Pino, or Marco da Siena ; he practised the art in Kaples, where many of his paintings are to be met with : thej' contain clever and spirited parts, with much that is affected and insipid. But the completest degeneracy is to be fomid in Rome, the very' place in which the greatest number of the most perfect models exist. Little deserving of record was produced here up to the last thirty years of the sixteenth century ; and from 1570 till 1600, every variety of manner contributed by turns to reduce the art to the very verge of ruin. Pope Gregory XIII. and his successors erected many buildings, ordered many paintings, but rapidity of hand alone had value in their eyes ; art was degraded to the lowest mechanical labour. The best among the artists of this time is Girolamo Siciolante da Sermoneta, who endeavoured to adhere to the style of the Raphael school : there is an excellent Pieta by him in the gallery of Count A. Raczynski at Berlin. An Adoration of the Shepherds in S. Maria della Pace, at Rome, is, in expression, colouring, and descriptiveuess of the scene, a very jjleasing Chap. IX. DECLIXE OF ART THE MAXXEEISTS, 475 picture. On the other hand, his frescoes in the Remigius cliapel of S. Liiigi de' Francesi are already much mannered. Pasquale Cati da Jesi painted in fresco the Martyrdom of St. Lawrence above the High Altar in S. Lorenzo in Panis- perna at Rome. The excellence of the drawing shows one of tlie best scholars of Micliael Angelo. Taddeo and Federigo Zuccaro, both generally insipid and trivial, with a disagreeable smooth manner ; yet we find in both the elements of considerable talent, particularly in works where portraits are introduced, which compelled them to ad- here more closely to nature. This is evident in their histori- cal paintings in the Castle of Caprarola.' Also in the admi- rable portrait of a Man with two Dogs in the Pitti Palace. Among other works, Federigo painted the cupola of the Duomo of Florence; it contains a multitude of figures, some of most colossal dimensions. A satire of the day concludes with these lines : — ■ " Poor Florence, alas ! will ne'er cease to complain Till she sees her fine cupola whitewash'd again." But this has never happened. Federigo was also an author, and evidently wished to rival Vasari : he wrote a theoretical work on art,^ filled with "■ intellectual and formative ideas, substantial substances, formal forms," &c. : he calls philosophy and philosophising '•' a metaphorical, allegorical drawing." Just as empty and inflated as these words are the greater number of his pictures. Here and there, however, his original gifts got the better of his false principles — as, for instance, in the Dead Christ surrounded by Angels, in the Borghese palace at Rome, which is a picture of great effect. Agostino Ciampelli, by birth a Florentine, and a scholar of Santi di Tito, deserves notice here for his graceful row of angels with votive offerings on the walls of the apsis of S. Maria in Trastevere ; also for two pictures in S. Pudenziana at Rome, representing pious females interring the bodies of martyrs. ' lUustri fatti Farnesiani coloriti nel Real Palazzo di Caprarola dai fratelli Taddeo, Federigo e Ottaviano Zuccari, dis. et inc. da G. G. de Pi-enner. Roma, 1748. * L' idea de' Scultori, Pittori e Architetti, Torino, 1607. There are also other short writings by Zuccaro. 476 MASTERS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Book V. Witli much maniieiisni he still displays a feeling for expi-essiuii a!id .simple beautj'. Giuseppe Cesare, il Cavaliere d'Arpino, is a better artist: he flourished, however, morq towards the beginning of the seventeenth century. We find in his works less of the deplo- rable manner just described, and a reasonable clear colouring. Among his better works are tiie ceiling frescoes in the choir uf S. »Silvestro a Monte Cavallo at Home. lie formed a great school by means of which he directed the Roman practice, and formed a decided opposition to other masters, particularly the school of the Carracci, to whom we shall presently come. A certain reaction to this decline of art was opposed by Federigo Baroccio of Urbiuo — 1528-1612 — originally a scholar of Battista Franco. He attached himself somewhat less super- ficially to the study of the great masters, especially of Correg- gio, so that he may take about the same rank as Parmegianino. His merit did not lie in any depth of intention or power — his con- ception is sometimes highly att'ected — his expression sentimen- tal, and his colouring, though often of an agreeable harmony and depth, yet rouge-like in the carnations. His better attri- butes are a very animated and decided emotion, and also a ten- der idyllic character, to which his dexterously-treated light and chiaroscuro gives a higher charm. When employed in the Vatican, at Rome, some of his rivals sought to take his life by poison ; this determined him to return to his home, and tliere to execute his numerous commissions, while his pictures, being dispersed to various parts of Italy, excited great interest. One of his principal works, a colossal Descent from the Cross, in the cathedral at Perugia, is not without grandeur in the agitated group surrounding the fainting- Virgin. A Madonna upon clouds, with St. Lucy tmd St. Antliony, in the Lonvre, has more technical merit. Christ with the Magdalen, in the Corsini Gallery at Rome, is, for truth and naivete, one of the best of his works. A large Madonna interceding for tlie poor, in the gallery of the Uffizj, is well painted. I'he pictures by him in the Vatican and in the Borghese palace are less remarkable. Among Baroccio's followers is Cristoforo Roncalli (ii Cava- liere delle Pomarance), by whom many, chiefly mediocre, works Chap. IX. DECLINE OF ART — THE :\rAXXERISTS. 477 exist ; the best, perliaps. are in the Cupola of S. Pudenziana ; also Giovanni Baglione ; several artists in Genoa, and others. Equal degeneracy appears in Bologna, where, as we have seen, the style of the Roman school had been transplanted by Raphael's scholars and imitators. Prospero Fontana, Lorenzo Sabbatini, Orazio Sanunachini, Bartolonimeo Passerotti, are the most celebrated masters of this period, but are seldom more than mere mannerists. An admirable Madonna, by Sabbatini, however, is in the Berlin Museum. Lavinia Fontana, the daughter of Prospero, has more merit ; her painting is clever and bold : in portraits especially slie has left some excellent works. Dionisio Fiammingo, properly Denys Cahart, from Ant- werp, who received his education in the school of Prospero Fontana, is among the better artists: he is certainly not free from mannerism, but is distinguished by a warmer colouring, which he probably brought from his native country. Barto- lommeo Cesi also deserves to be favourably mentioned, as his pictures, like those of Lavinia Fontana, show a closer attention to nature. Lastly, Luca Longhi may be mentioned : he inclined to tlie old manner of Francia's school ; but instead of the deep feel- ing of that master, we find in his pictures only an expression of an affected devotion. His chief Mork is a Marriage at Cana, in the refectory of the Camaldolese at Ravenna, with sinarle fine heads. In other places we find similar works and workmen : these may be passed over, with the exception of some artists of Genoa, where Perino del Yaga had spread the Roman stvle. The brothers Andrea and Otta\io Semini may be mentioned, but more particularly Luca Cambiaso (Luchetto da Genova), who, notwithstanding much mannerism, occasionally pleases by a clever and sound conception of nature. From amongst the Neapolitan mannerists of this time we must except Simone Papa the younger, who retained an agreeable simplicity, and distinguished himself by correctness of form : his most impor- tant works are the frescoes in the church of JMonte Oliveto at Naples. 478 MASTERS OF THE SEYENTEE^'TH CENTURY. Book VI. BOOK VI. RESTORATION AND SECOND DECLINE. MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES. CHAPTER I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. The immediate effect upon art of the renewed activity of the Roman Catholic Church, consequent on the Reformation, was very apparent in Italy, and as early as the latter part of tlie sixteenth century we trace the fresh development of Italian painting from many central localities. The greater number of artists of this time (that is the end of the sixteenth and first half of the seventeenth century) are known by the name of Eclectics, from their having endea- voured to select and unite the best qualities of each of the great masters, without however excluding the study of nature. This eclectic aim, when carried to an extreme, necessarily involves a great misapprehension with regard to the conception and practice of art, for the greatness of the earlier masters con- sisted precisely in their individual and peculiar qualities ; and to endeavour to unite characteristics essentially different at once implies a conti'adiction. In opposition to these eclectics arose another school, which endeavoured to form an independent style, distinct from those of the earlier masters. This freedom was to be based on an indiscriminate imitation of common nature, conceived in a bold and lively manner. The artists of this direction are distin- guished by the name of Naturalisli : each class exercised in its development a reciprocal influence on the other, particularly the Naturalisli on the Eclectics ; and it is frequently impos- sible to distinguish, with perfect precision, the artists of one class from those of the other. Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 479 The most important of the Eclectic schools was that of the Carracci at Bologna ; its founder, properly speaking, was Lo- dovico Caracci (1Ö55-1619), a scholar, first of Prospero P^on- tano, and afterwards of Tintoretto, in Venice. He passed his youth in constant and close attention to studies wliich had become a dead letter among the artists of the time, and which thus exposed liim to much ridicule and contem23t ; but this only made it the more evident to him that reform Avas desirable, and that it had become necessary to introduce rules and well-under- stood principles into art, to counteract the lawless caprice of the mainierists. But since, in such an undertaking, it was necessary to declare war against the superior strength of this undisciplined sect, he began by lookinij round for more power- ful assistance : he found it in the persons of his two nephews, Agostino and Annibale Carracci (Agost. 1558-1601, Annib. 1560-1609). They were sons of a tailor : Agostino bad been intended for a goldsmith, Annibale for his father's trade. Lo- dovico observed the predominant talent for painting in both, and took ujion himself to educate them as artists. In concert with them he opened an academy at Bologna, which bore the name of the Incamminati : this the Carracci fur- nished with all the necessarj»^ means of study — casts, drawings, and engravings ; sujiplied living models for drawing and paint- ing, and provided instruction in the theoi-etic departments of perspective, anatomy, &c. ; they superintended and directed the studies of their scholars (many of whom had had reason to complain of the superciliousness of the older masters) witli judgment and kindness. In spite of the opposition of the esta- blished painters, the school of the Carracci was more and more sought from day to day, and it Avas not long before all the other school« of art in Bologna were closed. The study of nature, and the imitation of the great masters, were the fundamental principles of this school. In aiming at tlie latter, they sought either to luiite the separate excellences of those masters in one style, or, in a somewhat ruder way, to treat single figures in their own pictures in the manner of this or that master, according to the character they wished to re- present. There is a sonnet by Agostino Carracci, in Mhich he defines the principles of the school agreeably to this system. 480 JIASTERS OF THE SEYEXTEEXTII CENTURY. Book VI. He says : — " Let him who wishes to be a good painter acquire the design of Rome, Venetian action and Venetian manage- ment of shade, the dignified colour of Lombardy (that is, of Leonardo da Vinci), the terrible manner of Michael Angelo, Titian's truth and nature, the sovereign purity of Correggio's style and the just symmetry of a Eaphael, the decorinn and well-grounded study of Tibaldi, the invention of the learned Primaticcio, and a little of Parmigianino's grace ; but without So much study and weary laboin*, let him apply himself to imitate the works which our Kiccolo (dell' Abliate) left us here." ' This patchwork ideal, the impossibility of which we have already alluded to, constituted only one transition step in the history of tlie Carracci and their school. In the prime of their artistic activity they greatly threw off their eclectic pre- tensions — tliey neither needed tlie decorum of Tibaldi nor the invention of I'rimaticcio — they had attained an independence of their o\\n. The imitation of the great masters, where it is ■ " Chi farsi un buoii pittor cerca. c desia, II disegno di Roma abbia alia mano, La mossa coll' ombrar Veneziano, E il degno colorir di Lombardia. Di Jlichel Angiol la terribil via, II vero natural di Tiziano, Del Correggio lo stil pnro e sovrano, E di un Rafel la giusta simmetria. Del Tibaldi il decoro, e il foudamento, Del dotto Primaticcio 1' inventare, E un po di grazia del PaiiBigianino. Ma senza tanti studj, e tanto stento, Si ponga 1' opre solo ad imitare Che qui lasciocci il nostro Isiccolino." [The above translation differs a little from that given by the author. The passage "la mossa coU' ombrar Veneziano," has been supposed to refer chiefly to Tintoret. (See Malvasia, quoted by Fuseli, Lectures, 1. ii.) It is to be observed that the word "mossa" is a technical term still applied in Italv to attitude or action: thus the expression " una bella mossa" is commonly applied to an academy figure. " Venetian shade" was no doubt intended to be understood less exclusively. The management of shade in this school generally corresponds with the effects we see in the open air : the intensest darks are confined to hollows ; all other shades are considered as lesser degrees of light : thus the mutable accidents of light seldom interfere with the permanent qualities of colour and form. The expression "the just sym- metrv of Raphael," was perhaps intended to relate to the balance of his composition and the shape of his masses — not merely to the proportions of the human form. — Ed.]] Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 481 apparent, is no longer of a soulless, superficial character, the mere plagiarism of single features, but is rather a thoroughly- understood and artistic appropriation of their highest qualities, bearing the character rather of rivalry than of imitation. It is true that the eclecticism they originally professed often left its traces in a coldness, stiffness, and academical consciousness, which offends the spectator ; but we are inclined to moderate even this criticism when we consider the difficulty of opposing fresh ideas to the exaggerated mannerisms then existing, and when we consider also that it was the individual energy of these painters which forced them a way througli the trammels of imitation. They possessed a true and a great feeling for the representation of the higher subjects of life, and it w as by their own incredible zeal that they attained a considerable, though not a perfect, harmony of corresponding style. In some re- spects they adopted the bold naturalism of their times, but moderated and refined by an acquaintance with the great models of antiquity, and with those of the Raphael period. The merit of Lodovico Carracci is more that of a teacher than of an independent and productive artist. The greater number of his works are at Bologna, particularly in the gal- lery : in general composition they are seldom attractive or dignified ; the ability they evince is rather to be sought in single parts. Among the finest of those in the gallery is a Madonna, in a glory of Angels, standing on the Moon, with St. Francis and St. Jerome beside her (the picture was taken from S. Maria degli Scalzi) : the Madonna and Child are painted with peculiar grace, and with a happy imitation of the chiaroscuro of Correggio. In the same collection there is a Birth of St. John the Baptist, with much that is attractive in the truth and artlessness of certain portions. In the convent of S. Michele in Bosco, at Bologna,' he painted (with his scholars) scenes from the liistory of St. Benedict and St. Cecilia ; these, in like maimer, are occasionally beautiful, and even maje>tically graceful. The miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, in the Berlin Museum, is insignificant in conception. We ' II Claustro di S. Michele in Bosco di Bologii,i, dip. dal tamoso Lodovico Carracci e da altri maestri usciti della sua Scuola; deser. dal Sig. Malvasia. Bologna, 1694. r 482 MASTERS OF THE SEVEXTEEXTH CENTURY. Book VI. remark that it was Lodovico Carracci who first dwelt, in his pictures, on the ])athos of" sorrow, whence resulted the many Ecce Homos and sorrowing Virgins of the Bolognese school. A large Pieta, of terrible but truly natural grief in expression, is in the Corsini Gallery at Rome. A colossal Ecce Homo, of beautiful and mild expression, though not of sufficient power, is in the Doria Gallery. Several pictures in the Louvre — a Madonna, an Adoration, and others, betray, in character and mode of light and shade, the study of Correggio. Agostino Carracci, on the whole, painted less ; he was a man of learned education, and superintended the theoretical instruction of the academy. He is particularly celebrated as an engi'aver. Among his paintings, which are rare, and remarkable for delicacy of treatment, the St. Jerome receiving the Sacrament before his Death (taken from the Carthusian church at Bologna) is the most important picture in the Bolognese gallery. The composition, like that of all tiie great works of the time, has the appearance of contrivance, but the picture has great truth of character, and contains much that is good in detail. The infant Hercules stranoling the Serpents, in the Louvre, of very energetic character, is by Agostino, though imputed to Annibale Carracci. Annibale Carracci is by far the most distinguished of this family. In consequence of his studies in Upper Italy, we find an imitation of Correggio, and afterwards of Paul Veronese, in his earlier works ; but after his residence in Rome, his own powerful style, formed under the influence of the works of Raphael and Michael Angelo, and of the antique, as he under- stood it, developed itself in a new form. Annibale does not always please ; his forms have often something general and unindividual, and are deficient in the true enthusiasm for the subject : fettered by the sense of the naturalism against which he had to contend, he seems to have been afraid of trusting to his own inspiration. For all this, if the spectator be just, he may always recognise the greatness of the painter in the powerful life which pervades his w^orks, and, in cases where his feeling for nature is allowed to have scope, in his freshness and vigour. In the Gallery of Bologna there is a picture of his from the church of S. Giorgio, in which the Madonna is Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 483 in the manner of Paul Veronese ; the Infant and the little St. John in that of Correggio ; St. John the Evangelist in that of Titian, while the St. Catherine resembles Parmeo-ia- nino. We find similar motices in a large picture of St, Roch distributing alms, in the Dresden Gallery-, one of his most celebrated works. Annibale is most happ)- in small composi- tions, such as Madonnas and Holy Families. A very grace- ful picture of the kind is in the Tribune at Florence ; another is in the Museum at Berlin. One similar to the last men- tioned is in the Louvre, where tliere are also a large number of his pictures of the most various periods, A Pieta, often repeated, is very excellent. A Dead Christ in the lap of the Madonna, with two weeping boy-angels ; the picture is ex- tremely well composed, and the Virgin particularly has some- thing of the free dignity of the masters of the beginning of the century. A very beautiful repetition of this picture is in the Borghese Gallery at Rome, another is in the Museum of Naples. Also the celebrated picture of the Three Marvs, — a Dead Christ, the Madonna and two women, — at Castle Howard, is of deep and noble pathos in the expression of grief. The series of frescoes of mythological designs in the Farnese palace at Rome,' and particularly in the so-called gallery of the palace, is generally considered his best performance. Indeed these works may be considered the fairest criterion of the school. Artistically speaking, they claim the iiighest admiration : for the technical process of fresco we know no more finished spe- cimen. The arrangement on the arched ceiling of the great saloon is only surpassed (and that, it is true, in a diflferent way) by the Sistine chapel. The drawing is altogether mas- terly both in the nude and in the draperies, and, as far as fresco permits, modelling, colouring, and chiaroscuro may be termed perfect. But independently of the ostentatious study of Raphael and Michael Angelo, which is everywhere appa- rent, we especially feel the want of the appropriate life, the real capacity for enjoyment, which after all, in subjects of this kind, is absolutely essential. Thus, from the composition and ' These have been freqnently engraved : the best work is — Galerife Far- nesianae Icones, etc., ab Annibale Carraiio coloribus exjiressse, a Petro Aquila del. inc. Romae. y 2 484 MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. Bo^^k YI. gestures of the "Galatea" — one of the many suljjects re- ])resented — it is evident tlie picture was intended to express the fullest enjoyment of the senses; but its general expression is, on the contrary, cold and heavy, and tiie same may be said of other mythical subjects by Annibale ; in many of them, how- ever (for example, in the famous Bacchante in the Tribune of Florence, and in the Museum at Naples), the colouring is very masterly. The piintings in the Farnese palace were his last important works. The parsimony of Ids employers provoked his anger, and had an unfavourable effect on his health, which was utterly destroyed by a journey to Naples and the perse- cutions he encountered fiom the Neapolitan artists. He died soon after his return to Rome. Besides his historical works, Annibale \»as one of the first who practised landscape jjainting as a separate department of art. In him and his contemporaries the influence of the Ne- therlanders and the Yeneti.ins, of Paul Brill and of Tiian was united, and they, in their turn, laid the foundation for Poussin and Claude Lorraine. In many of Annibale's historical pic- tures, as, for example, in several in the Louvre, the landscape divides the interest with the figures. It is true his landscape is wanting: in the charm whicli later landscape painters attained, and also in the glow of colour which belongs to Titian. With ali his lively feeling for grand and beautiful lines, and for a corresponding arrangement of architecture, Annibale's land- scapes still bear the stamp of spirited scene-paintings. Many of this description are in the Doria palace at Eome, and a very admirable picture of energetic effect and poetical composition is in the Museum at Bei lin. Two beautiful landscapes are in the National Gallery at London. Two others, one of which directly recalls Paul Brill, are at Castle Howard. Genre pic- tures by Annibale also exist. The "Greedy Eater" in the Colonna palace at Rome, and another in the Uffizj gallery at Naples, are interesting proofs of the humorous vigour of which this painter was capable. A number of important artists sprang from the school of the Carracci, with various peculiarities of style, and in some respects they surpassed their masters. The most celebrated are the follo-wing. Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 485 Domenico Zampieri, surnamed Domenichino ' (1581-1641), a painter in whose works, more than in those of any other artist of the time, we occasionally observe the pure artlessness, the free conception of nature, which were peculiar to the con- temporaries of Raphael. Even Domenichino, on the whole, and in essentials, could never cast aside the trammels of his school ; this indeed was to be the less expected, as he does not appear to have been gifted with a particularly rich fancy. He frequently made use of the compositions of other artists, — as in his celebrated picture of the Connnunion of St. Jerome, now in the Vatican — in which we finJ, a close imitation of the same subject by Ag-ostino Carracci. The imitation is not, however, servile, and there is an interesting individuality in several of the heads. It was seldom that he succeeded per- fectly in the higher subjects of inspiration. Among his best specimens are the Four Evangelists, in the pendentives of the cupola of S. Andrea della Valle at Kome — nonderful com- positions, in wiiicli the group of the St. John, surrounded with angels, constitutes one of the finest efforts we know of this kind. In other liistorical pictures Domenicliino is often cold and studied, especially in the principal subject, while, on the other hand, the subordinate persons have much grace, and a noble character of beauty. Of this the two frescoes in S. Luigi at Rome, from the life of St. Cecilia, are striking examples. It is not the Saint herself, bestowing her goods from a balcony, who constitutes the chief subject, but the masterly group of poor people struggling for them below. The same may be said of the Death of tlie Saint, where the admiration and grief of the bystanders are inimitable. Also of the Scourging of St. Andrew, in the chapel of that saint, next S. Gregorio, on Monte Celio at Rome ; liere a group of women, thrust back by the executioners, is of the highest beauty. The most beautiful works are at Fano, in a chapel of the Duomo ; they represent scenes from the life of the Virghi, painted in fresco. They have surtiared from the smoke, when part of the church was burnt ; but we can perceive, in the Visit of Mary to Elizabeth — the best-preserved picture — a feeling for beauty, a purity, candour, and mildness of expres- ^ Outlines iu Laudou, Vies et (Euvres, etc., t. Domeiiichino. 486 MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY, Book VI, sion, such as are perhaps not to be met with in any of his other works. There are many beautiful parts in the frescoes, from the history of St. Nilus, which Domeiiichino painted at Grottaferrata,' near Rome, and likewise in those of S. Andrea della Valle, at Rome, particularly the historical scenes on the ceiling of the tribune: they are not, however, free from the faults aljove mentioned. His great altar-pictures, selected and brought together in the Gallery of Bologna, contain little more than theatrical attitudes. The Martyrdom of St. Sebas- tian in S. M. degli Angeli, at Rome, is deficient in conception, and altogether in subject lies beyond the sphere of this master. At this time pictures of martyrdom, in which Raphael and his times were so sparing, came greatly into vogue ; painters and patrons sought for passionate emotion, and these subjects sup- plied them with plentiful food. Another of Domenichino's best works, an oil-painting in the Boighese Gallery in Rome, represents Diana and her Nymphs, some of whom are shooting at a mark with arrows, others are bathing — a very pleasing composition, peculiarly fine in its lines, and full of characteristic movement ; but even here the expression of the faces is not equally natural through- out. A beautiful and nai've picture by tliis master, a gviardian Angel defending his charge, a fine, splendid boy, from Satan, is ill the Studj Gallery at Naples. The half length figure of St. John, looking upwards in inspiration, well known by Müller's engraving, though tliis is not qiute true to the original, is in Prince Narischkin's collection at Petersburg. Another, not less admirable, is at Castle liowaid. A fine St. Sebastian, with pious women dressing his wounds, some- what recalling the Venetian manner, is in the Stadel Insti- tution at Frankfort. Like Annibale Carracci, Domenichino was invited to Naples ; like him too he w'as persecuted by the Neapolitan painters, who would tolerate no strangers. Of his works in Naples the most important are in the chapel of the Tesoro in the Duomo. He died before their completion — it is suspected, by poison. Domenichino was also an excellent landscape-painter. The ' Picturae Domenici Zampierii quae extant in Sacello sacra; a;-(li Clirypto- feiratensi adjuncto. Roma?, 1762. Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 487 character of his landscapes, like that of Aniiibale Carracci's, is decorative; but it is united in a happy manner witli warmth of colour, and a cheerful, lively feeling. Excellent works of the kind are in the Villa Lndovisi and in the Doria Gallery in Rome, in the Louvre, and in the National Gallery and Bridgewater Galler}- in London. Domenichino formed but few scholars ; one of them, Giam- battista Passeri, is one of the most esteemed writers on the history of Italian painting. Francesco Albaui (1578-1660).' Elegance is in one Avord the characteristic of this painter. He deliglits in cheerful subjects, in w hich a playful fancy can expatiate, such as scenes and figures from ancient mythology — above all, Venus and her companions, smiling landscapes, and hosts of charming amorini, wl)0 surround the principal groups, or even form the subject of the picture. But his works, both landscape and figures, have throughout a merely decorative character ; their eleg-ance seldom rises to grace of mind ; their playfulness rarely be- speaks real enjoyment. Pictures of the class alluded to are not uncommon in galleries ; in the Louvre, especially, there is a number of them. In the Borghese Gallery are the Four Seasons, which miglit just as w'ell be called the four elements (only one of them by liis own hand), with others in the Colonna palace. In the Verospi palace (now the Torlonia palace) are some very pleasing frescoes of an allegorical-mythological nature, still preser\ ed on the ceilings of the Loggia, on the first story. Religious subjects occur less frequently ; but in these (some are in the Gallery of Bologna), if not more pro- found, he appears more skilful, and is tolerably free from exaggeration and aflfectation. One of his most graceful and frequently repeated compositions is the Infant Christ sleepin»- on the Cross. Albani formed various scholars at Bologna and at Rome. The best of these are : — Giovanni Battista Mola, a French- man, an unaffected painter, by whom there are some good portraits ; Pier Francesco Mola, from the vicinity of Como, excellent in historical pictures, and in single figures, especially as respects colour : his landscapes, of a Biblical and mvtlio- ' Outlines in Landon, Vies et CEuvres, etc., t. Albani. 488 MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CEVTURY. Book VI. logical import, are grandly composed, and are admirable in effect of light and atmosphere, and especially in glowing even- ing scenes. Carlo Cignani, an artist of no great importance, characterized by a graceful but superficial style : one of his pictures, Joseph and Potiphar's Wife, is in the Dresden Gal- lery ; an enormous Assumption of the Virgin is also in the Munich Gallery. Andrea Sacchi, tlie cleverest of the school : a picture by him (an excellent work of its kind), representing S. Romualdo among the Friars of his Order, is in the Vatican : it hardly deserves the epithet grand, but contains some noble •figures in well-managed white drapery ; a Miracle by St. Gregory, in the same gallery, is trivial in invention, but of a luminous effect of colour : other \vorks of his are very inferior. Carlo Maratti, a scholar of Sacchi, flourished about the end of the seventeenth century — an artist of limited ability, whose works exhibit an insipid striving after ideal l)eauty — he may be called an inferior Guido. The absence of expression and meaning, which is the characteristic of his contemporaries of the end of the seventeenth cen+ury, is at all events replaced in his pictures by great study of composition. His real repu- tation in the history of Art is founded on the care with Avhich he watched over Eaphael's frescoes in Rome and superintended their restoration. Guido Reni (1575-1642).' This artist was gifted with a refined feeling for beauty, both in form and grouping. In a freer period of Art he Mould probably liave attained the highest excellence, but it is precisely in his works that the restraint of his age is most apparent. His ideal consisted not so much in an exalted and purified conception of beautiful nature, as in an unmeaning, empty abstraction, devoid of in- dividual life and personal interest. In the beauty of his forms, of the heads particularly (which are mostly copied from celebrated antiques, for example, the Niobes), and in his grouping, we perceive the cold calculation of the vuiderstand- ing, and it is but seldom that a spontaneous feeling makes its way. The progressive development of Guido was singular in its kind, for its period was marked by works very dissimilar in style. Those of his early time have an imposing, almost • Outlines in Landoa, Vies et Qüuvres, etc., t. Guido. Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 489 violent character : iLrrand, jjowerful figures, majestically ar- ranged, and dark shadows, resembling the manner of the Naturalistic j^artieularly of Carava'j:gio, of whom we shall presently speak. Among these the Crucifixion of St. Peter, now in the Vatican, is quoted as having been painted in imita- tion of Caravaggio ; it has the heavy, powerful forms of that master, but wants the passionate feeling which sustains such subjects — it is a martyrdom and nothing more — it might pass for an enormous and horrible genre picture. Some of the best pictures in the gallery at Bologna belong to this class. A large picture called the Madonna della Pieta may be first mentioned : in the upper part is the body of Christ, laid on a tapestry, the Mater Dolorosa and two weeping angels at the sides ; underneath are the patron saints of Bologna : the.se have less merit. Still more grand is the Crucifixion : the Madonna and St. John are beside the Cross : the Virgin is a figure of solemn beauty — one of Guido's finest and most dignified creations. A third very celebrated picture at Bo- logna is the Massacre of the Innocents : the female figures are beautiful, and the composition is very animated, but the feeling for mere abstract beauty is hei"e very apparent. We pass over other works of this kind, some of them very cele- brated, but really of less excellence, and mei-ely mention in addition a picture in the Berlin Museum representing the two hermits, St. Paul and St. Anthony ; they are powerful figures, and might be called true heroes of the desert. At a subsequent time this fondness for the powerful became moderated, and a more simple and natural style of imitation succeeded, but there are few examples extant of this happy period of transition. Guido'.s best picture — unfortunately an unfinished one — belongs to this time ; it is in the choir of S. Martino at Naples, whither the painter was invited ; but like other artists, he was driven away by the jealousy of the Nea- politans. The subject is the Nativity : in tlie figures of the shepherds and women, who come to worship, there is a beauty and artlessness such as are not to be found in any other of his works. A second excellent specimen is the large painting on the ceiling of the garden pavilion of the Kospigliosi palace at Rome : Aurora precedes Phoebus, whose chariot is drawn by Y 3 490 MASTERS OF THE SEVENfTEENTH CENTURY. Book VI. white [and piebald] horses, while the Hours advance in rapid flight. Among the latter are some graceful figures in beautiful action ; the whole is brilliantly coloured. A third, and highly pleasing work, apparently of this, his best time, is the fresco in the apsis of the Cappella S. Silvia, near S. Gregorio, at Rome ; it represents a concert of angels above a balustrade adorned with drapery, on which lie the music books. In the centre are three naked children singing, and on each side the charming figures of full grown angels with trumpets, violoncellos, flutes, and tambourines. Some of them are whispering playfully together ; others are looking curiously down : above is the First Person of the Trinity, in the act of benediction. The whole picture is imbued witli a glow of youtiiful animation and beauty, which reminds us of the best times of Italian art. Also another fresco, in the neighbouring Cappella S. Andrea, is of high merit — St. Andrew, on his way to execution, sees the cross awaiting him in the distance, and falls upon his knees in adoration ; the executioners and spectators regard him with astonishment. The artist's transition to a less pleasing manner is seen in a picture of which there are luimerous repetitions (at Rome in the Gallery of the Capitol, at Schleissheim. in the Museum of Berlin, etc.) : it represents P'ortune as a naked female figure, sweeping over the globe, while a genius endea- vours to hold her back by her veil and hair. Here we may also mention the decoration of the sacramental chapel in the cathedral at Ravenna. There is an excellent Glory in the cupola, and the Gathering of Manna, over the altar. Guido's works, during this transition, are distinguished by an agreeable warmth of colour. Tliose of a later period are of a pale silvery grey ; in these the insipid ideality, before alluded to, exhibits itself more and more, and approaches its greatest degeneracy, viz., a vapid generalization without character — an empty, ordinary kind of gracf. Perhaps the best of this class is tlie famous Assumption of the Virgin, in the gallery at Municli ; one of the angels, for examjile, who supports the Madonna, is remarkable for its delicacy and grace. A more celebrated picture in the Gallery of Bologna has, in reality, less merit ; it represents a Madonna in a glory Chnp. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 401 of angels, with the patron-saints of Bologna underneath ; the picture is called '• II Pallione " (the Church Standard), from having been originally used in processions. In the latter part of his life Guido often painted with careless haste ; he had given himself up to play, and sought to retrieve his immense losses by raising money as rapidly and easily as he could. At this time cliiefly were painted the numerous Madonnas, Cleo- patras, Sibyls, etc., which are to be found in every gallery.' Better specimens of this kind are in the Spada Gallery, at Rome ; the best is perhaps the Andromeda, in the Rospigliosi Summer-house. A large number of his works, of various periods, are in the Louvre. A very beautiful Madonna, with the Sleeping Child, executed with greater care and severity than usual, is in the palace of the Quirinal. In the same palace, serving for the altar-piece of the Pope's private chapel, is a Madonna with a glory of angels. Guido formed a great number of scholars, part of whom imitated his later manner. Among these are Semenza, Gessi, Domenico Canuti, Guido Cagnacci. The best are Simone Cantarini and Gio. Andrea Sirani, whose daughter and scholar, Elisabetta Sirani, also distinguished herself in this style. Gio. Francesco Barbieri, surnamed Guercino da Cento (1590-1666),^ although not immediately belonging to the school of the Carracci, or having remained in it but a short time, nevertheless decidedly followed the same general style. The progress of his development may be compared to that of Guido Reni ; but lie is distinguished from that master by the expression of a livelier feeling, while Guido rather follows his own ideal beauty. In the early works of Guercino we find the same power and solidity, the same depth of shadow, but already tempered by a certain sweetness, and by an admirable chiaroscuro. There are two excellent pictures of this class in the Gallery of Bologna — St. William of Aquitaine assuming the garb of a monk, and the Virgin appearing to St. Bruno. ' [This must be understood of the inferior repetitions of these subjects, for some of this class are among Guide's most careful and pleasing pro- ductions. — Ed.] .^ Jac. Aless. Calvi, Notizia della Vita e delle Opera di Gio. Franc. Bar- bieri detto il Guercino da Cento. Bologna, 1808. 492 MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY, Book VI. Also, in the Sparia Gallery at Rome, Dido's Last Moments — a large picture, full of figures. The expression of sorrow and passion in Dido and iier attendants is of the utmost power, the colouring glowing and deep. St. Petronilla, in the Gallery of the Capitol, is of a more superficial character, but painted in a masterly manner. St. Peter raising Tabitha, in the Pitti Palace, though of smaller dimensions, is a chef-d'oeuvre. A Madonna in the clouds, adored by several saints, is in the Louvre. The Incredulity of Thomas, in the gallery of the Vatican, is also a distinguished work ; the profile of the Saviour especially is very noble in expression. Among other good paintings of this kind may be mentioned the Prophets and Sibyls in the cupola of the Cathedral of Piacenza, and the Aurora, in a small garden pavilion of the Villa Ludovisi, at Rome. The last named vs^orks, with their glowing colour- ing, combined with broad and dark masses of shadow, almost attain the effect of oil paintings. At a later period Guercino, like Guido, adopted a softer style, in which he produced a fascinating effect by a delicate combination of colours. His works of this time have a certain sentimental character, which in some instances is developed with peculiar grace. Among the best are the Dismissal of Hagar, in the gallery at Milan, and a Sibyl in the Tribune at Florence ; also several pictures in the Louvre and in English galleries. A splendid Cleopatra is in the Brignole Palace at Genoa. But in his later works the same insipidity observable in Guido frequently appears ; a repulsive mannerism takes the place of sentiment, and the colouring is pale and indistinctly washy. Guercino also practised landscape-painting, and ac- quired in this department a beautiful and rich style of colouring. Several painters of the Gennari family, among whom Bene- detto was the most remarkable, were scholars and imitators of Guercino. Giovanni Lanfi'anco (1581-1647). Li the hands of this painter tlie art again degenerates to a mere mechanism, an effort to produce effect by dexterity and superficial means : abrupt contrasts of light and shade ; grouping according to school precepts rather than according to the nature of the Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 493 subject ; fore-shortenings without necessity, merely to make a display of drawing ; countenances which, notwithstanding the tension of every feature, express nothing : tliese are the elements of Lanfranco's art. Even the study of nature is neglected, and the severity and solidity of the Carracci begin to disappear — the sole merit of a facile and cheerful colour nmst be excepted. Yet Lanfranco succeeded better than perhaps any other artist of the school : many considerable cupola-paintings were executed by him ; for example, those of S. Andrea della Valle in Rome, and those in the Tesoro at Naples, where he alone successfully maintained his position against the Neapolitan artists. Where the subject permitted of a naturalistic conception he is generally the most successful. His St. Louis feeding the Poor, in the Academy at Venice, is a good picture of this kind ; also the Liberation of St. Peter, in the Colonna palace at Rome. On the other hand, his St. Cecilia, in the Barberini palace, with her bold expres- sion and vulgar action, may serve as a specimen of this artist's worst style. The following are among the less celebrated scholars of the Carracci. Alessandro Tiarini, chiefly distinguished by clever execution : many of his best pictures are in the gallery of Bologna. — Lionello Spada, a powerful painter, who happily combined the more dignified conception of the Carracci with the vigour and trutli of Caravaggio. Giacomo Cavedone, also a very able painter : there is an excellent picture by him ill the same galleiy. — In addition to these may be mentioned the landscape-painter Francesco Grimaldi, who imitated the decorative style already spoken of as characterizing the land- scapes of Annibale. There is a series of pictures by him in the Borghese gallery at Rome : a good specimen is also to be seen in the Berlin Musemn. — The fruit-painter, II Gobbo da' Frutti (the Hunchback of Cortona), properly speaking Pietro Paolo Bonzi : large and excellent fruit pictures by him are at Alton Towers. Bartolommeo Schedone of Modeua, who died at an earlv age in 1615, is also said to have formed his style under the influence of this school. In his earlier works the study of Correggio is chiefly apparent, but the sharpness and severity 494 MASTERS OF THE SEYEXTEEXTII CEXTURY. Book VT. of Schedone form an unfavourable contrast to the refined style of that master. He is more pleasing in other works which are independent of this influence, and which are characterized by a straightforward imitation of nature in the manner of the Naturulisti. Several interesting pictures by Schedone are in the Museum at Naples, where indeed most of his works are collected : two, representing the distribution of alms to the poor, are especially worthy of notice. Gio. Battista Salvi, surnamed Sassoferrato from his birth- place (1605-1685), is also said to have been formed by scholars of the Carracci, and chiefly, it is supposed, by Dome- nichino. He is, however, a tolerably independent artist, free from the ideal feebleness and emptiness of the later followers of the Carracci. He rather imitated, and not without success, the older masters of the beginning of the sixteenth century, and has indeed a certain affinity with them in his peculiar, but not always unaffected, gentleness of mien. "We have already mentioned his free copies after Raphael's Madonna with the Pink (p. 339), and Titian's picture of the Three Ages. He copied also from Pietro Perugino, a master who, in those times, was somewhat looked down upon. Pictures of this kind, with an excellent copy of Raphael's Entombment, are in S. Pietro at Perugia. His own original pictures have no particular depth, but are smooth, pleasing, and often of great sweetness of expression, which occasionally degenerates into sentimentality. The INIadonna and Child were his con- stant subject ; in some of these" pictures he appears to great advantage ; every large gallery possesses one or more of them. The Holy Family also, in their domestic character, was a favourite subject of his, in his treatment of which he appears to have been the forerunner of the modern romantic school ; for example, in a picture of this kind, in the Studj Gallery at Naples, the Madonna is represented sewing, Joseph planing wood, and the youthful Christ cleaning the room. His most celebrated picture is the Madonna del Rosario, in S. Sabina at Rome. The expression of St. Domenick is of a high order of pathos. Sassoferrato finished his pictures, as his tendency would lead us to expect, with great care and minuteness. Other Eclectic schools appeared in Italy simultaneously Chap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 495 with the school of the Carracci, That of the Campi, for example, at Cremona, which flourished in the middle and toward the end of the sixteenth century. The head of this school is Giulio Campi (1500-1572) : he was originally taught by Giulio Romano, but afterwards followed the manner of several of the great masters. Giulio educated liis brother Antonio, a more mannered artist, and Bernardino Campi, another relative, who is the most important master of this school. His works are principally to be found in Cremona. A Pieta, in the Louvre, shows the study of Raphael in the noble form of the Virgin, and of Correggio in the warmth of the colouring, though it is tasteless in composition. Sofonisba Anguisciola was his scholar : Count Raczynski of Berlin possesses an excellent family picture by her. A third Eclectic school is that of the Procaccini at Milan ; it rose to greater importance than that of the Campi, owing to the patronage of the Borromeo family. Its founder, Ercole Procaccini (1520-1590), was born and educated at Bologna, and flourished in the second half of the sixteenth century. His works are not very extraordinary, but they evince a carefuhiess and industry which perhaps preserved him from the degenerate mannerism of the time, and well fitted him for the office of a teacher. His best scholar was his son Camillo, who flourished about the beginning of the seventeentii century. In the works of this artist we find, together w^ith the study of the older masters, a particular and sometimes successful imi- tation of Correggio and Parmigianino, united with a clever conception of nature. He is, however, very unequal : a great facility in conception and execution led him into frequent abuse of his talents, particularly in the works which he exe- cuted out of Milan. His better pictures are in the churches and galleries of that city ; in these a peculiar gentleness occa- sionally reminds us of the maimer of Sassoferrato. A Madonna aail Child, in S. Maria del Carmine, and an Adoration of the Kings, in the Brera, both deserve notice. Giulio Cesare Procaccini, the brother of Camillo, applied himself also to the imitation of Correggio, and in small cabinet pictures not without success. There is a good specimen in the Berlin Museum — the Angel appearing to Joseph in a Dream ; other 496 MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. Book VI. works by him are at Milan. This artist too is very unequal, and is frequently mannered. Of the numerous descendants of the school of Procaccini the most disting'uished is Giovanni Battista Crespi, surnamed II Cerano from his birth-place (1557-1653). This artist, though not free from mannerism, is powerful and grand. There are excellent pictures by him in the Brera at Milan, and a very clever one in the Musemn of Berlin. — His son and scholar, Daniel Crespi, is a less distinguished artist, but there is a series of clever portraits by him in S. Maria della Pas- sione at Milan. — Enea Salmeggia, surnamed II Talpino, also belongs to the school of the Procaccini, having first studied with the Campi. He deserves notice from his peculiarly simple dignity and beautiful reminiscences of Correggio and Leonardo da Yinci. Several of his pictures are in the Milan gallery. The school afterwards degenerated into a superficial manner, with a total want of character. To this period belongs Ercole Procaccini the younger. Tlie efforts of Baroccio at Rome to get up a certain eclectic opposition to the mannerism of the day we have already noticed (p. 476) ; but he and his Roman scholars became mannerists themselves in turn. Some Florentines who joined his school towards the end of the sixteenth century were, however, more successful, and finally developed an eclectic style of their own. This late Florentine school is distinguished by great richness of colouring, and by a suc- cessful representation of earthly beauty. But its merits are confined to single figures ; in composition it rarely attains any excellence. The most important follower of Baroccio is the Florentine Ludovico Cardi da Cigoli (1559-1613); he is distinguished by a beautiful, warm colouring, but in expression frequently degenerates into extreme sentimentality or exaggerated passion. The gallery of the Uffizj at Florence possesses many of his works. One of the most important, the Martyrdom of St. Stephen, is as excellent in colouring as it is violent and con- fused in action and expression. He frequently painted the subject of St. Francis : tlie best is in the Pitti palace, where there is also a Christ walking on the sea with Peter, and a Cliap. I. ECLECTIC SCHOOLS. 497 good Ecce Hoino.' A beautiful little picture of the Flig-ht into Egypt is in the Louvre. Among- his scholars are Gre- gorio Pagani. Domenico da Passignano, Antonio Biliverti (properly speaking Bilevelt of Maestricht), by whom there is a charming picture of tlie young and old Tobit with the angel, in the Pitti palace, and many others. Domenico Feti, the Roman, who inclines to the maimer of the Naturalisti, has left a number of good, small, genre pictures, of Biblical subjects ; also a mourning figure of the most excellent expres- sion — in the Louvre it is designated as a JNIagdalen — in the Academy at Venice as " Melancholy." A most animated and effective specimen of this painter is at Castle Howard ; - several are in the Dresden Gallery. Cristofano Allori, a Florentine, son of Alessandro Allori, already mentioned, belongs to the same general school (1577- 1621). He is one of the best artists of his time, and in some works rises far above the confined aim of his contemporaries, displaying a noble originality. His most finished picture is in the Pitti palace, and represents Judith with the head of Holofernes ; she is a beautiful and splendidly attired woman, with a grand, enthusiastic expression. The countenance is wonderfully fine and Medusa-like, and conveys all that the loftiest poetry can express in the character of Judith. In the head of Holofernes it is said that the artist has represented his own portrait, and that of his proud mistress in the Judith. There are several repetitions of this picture : one, of the same size, is in the Imperial gallery at Vienna : a second, of small dimensions, very delicately executed, is in the Ulfizj at Florence. Other works by the same artist, some of them of great merit, are to be met with in Florence, for example in the Uffiz). In the Louvre there is an animated and truthful historical picture — Isabella of Milan pleatiing with Charles VIII. for peace for her father. Mr. Wells's collection also contained a noble and grandly-conceived St. Cecilia, little inferior to his Judith, there attributed to Domenichino. Good portraits by this master often occur. ' [The Ecce Homo in the Pitti Gallery is a pioductiou of such excellence, that it might have warranted a higher general eulogy on the artist. — Ed.] ^ [A portrait, probably that of the painter. .See Waagen, Kunstwerke, &c., in England, vol. ii. p. 414. — Ed.] 498 MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. Book YI. A large picture by Jacobo (Chinienti) da Empoli (1554- 1640) is in the Uffizj Gallery; in noble conception and truth and glow of colour it reminds us of the best old Florentine masters. A saint, in magisterial costume, is seated on a Ihrone, on each side the donor's family. In the same gallery is a repre- sentation of the First Person of the Trinity creating Adam. A picture by Matteo Rosselli (1578-1650) is in the Pitti palace ; it represents the Triumph of David, and is distinguished by a freshness of life and beauty which entitle it to be classed with the happiest of Domenichino's creations. Matteo formed a numerous school. Giovanni di S. Giovanni (called Manozzi), Baldassare Francesohini (Volterranno giovane), and Fiancesco Furini, are among the best of his followers. These artists, if unequal to their master, have left very pleasing works, in one department at least, viz., portrait-painting. There is an ex- cellent Hunting-jmrty by Giovanni in the Pitti palace ; but there is also a tasteless picture by the same artist in the Uffizj, representing Venus arranging Cupid's hair with a comb. Five good frescoes of a naturalistic, character are in the cloister near Ognissanti at Florence. Carlo Dolce (1616-1686), also from the school of Matteo Ivosselli, is about equal in merit to his contemporary Sasso- ferrato. He also limited himself to the confined circle of Madonnas and saints, and in these subjects has displayed a peculiar gentleness, grace, and delicacy. He is distinguished from Sassoferrato by a greater degree of sentimentality, which is sometimes pleasing, but it frequently degenerates into in- sipidity and affectation. Plis works are not rare in galleries : among tlie best are a Madonna and Child in the Pitti palace ; a St. Cecilia in the Dresden Gallery (several repetitions are in other places) ; a St. .John the Evangelist is in the Berlin Museum. Carlo Dolce repeats himself often, and introduces the same motive in various forms — as a Madonna,' as a Mag- dalen, as St. ApoUonia, &c. Of his historical pictures we know only one of importance — St. Andrew praying by the Cross before his Execution, inscribed 1646, in the Pitti palace.' The deep devotion of the saint is finely contrasted with tlie ' [A similar picture by Carlo Dolce is iu the collection of the Earl of Ash- burnham. — Ed.] Chap. II. THE XATURALISTI. 499 gestures of the executioners. The painting is solid, and the hands, as in all Carlo Dolce's pictures, of the most admirable form. On the other hand, Diogenes with his Lantern, in the same gallery, shows how little the painter had a turn for humorous subjects. In the course of the seventeenth centurj' a new mannerism hastened the decay of the now nearly extinct influence of the Eclectic school. The principal founder of this pernicious style, which chiefly aimed at filling space with the least cost of labour, was Pietro Berettini da Cortona (1596-1669). Tlie intrinsic meaning of his subjects he altogether disre- garded : even his thorough knowledge of nature he turned to no purpose, but contented himself with dazzling and superficial effects, with contrasts of masses, florid colouring and violent lights. In spite of this he scarcely succeeds in concealing his own great natural talents, and even in his most mannered works we recognize a great inventive power. He lived and worked at Florence and Rome : the allegorical paintings on the ceiling of a large saloon of the Palazzo Barberini in Rome are his chief works.' In both cities he left a great number of scholars, who faithfully adhered to Ids style, and thus dictated the taste of the eighteenth century. We shall return to them. Contemporary with this corruption of art, we remark a general decline of Italian power in every department — politics, church, and literature. CHAPTER II. THE NATURALISTI. The hostility of the NoturaUsti to the Eclectics, particularly to the school of the Carracci, has already been alluded to. It manifested itself not only by means of the pencil, but, as we have seen, had recourse to poison and the dagger. The Naturalisti were so called from their predilection for common ' Baiberinije anise fornix Romje eq. Petri Berettini Cortonensis picturis admii-andus. J. J. de Rubels ed. OOO MASTERS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. Book VI. nature — for direct imitatiun. But this taste does not ai)pear to have been merely accidental with them, as a consequence of any particular mania for originality ; on the contrary, it is founded on a peculiar feeling, which displayed itself in full force (and it must be confessed too exclusively) for the first time in their vväs. Italy, once blessed witli the noblest crea- tive power, once gifted with the liveliest perception of the beautiful, now only dreams of past renown. The arts have quitted her, to seek a new home in other lands. LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO. Page Amalfi. Duomo : Agemina 82 g'o= : ; : : IS}-- Aquileja. Church : Mosaics 70 Arezzo. Duomo: Berna 160 Pietro Benvenuti . . . 511 S. Francesco: Pietro della Fraiicesca . 138 note, 215 S. Maria dcgli Angeli : Spinello 152 Arona (near Milan). Gaudenzio Vinci 293 Assisi. Church degli Angeli (Stanza di S. Francesco) : Lo Spagna 259 Convent of S. Andrea : Ingegno ....... 258 S. Damiano : Eusebio di S. Giorgio . . 260 Duomo: Niccolo Alunno .... 251 S. Francesco: (Upper Church) : Giunto da Pisa .... 106 Cimabue ...... 110 Giotto 131 (Under Church) : Giotto 124 Giottino ..,.>. 138 Giovanni da Melano . . . 139 Page (Chapel of S. Stefano) : Lo Spagna 259 Bassano. Municipalita : Bassano 467 note S. Valentino : Bassano 467 note La Basti a. S. Angela: Niccolo Alunno . , . » 251 Bergamo. S. Spirito : Andr. Previtali . . Bologna^ Academy : Giotto . Beat. Cat. Vigri Jacobo Paulus Simone di Bologna Francesco Cossa Perugino Francia . Guido Aspevtini Lorenzo Costa Bugiardini . . Raphael . . Tim. della Vite Bagnacavallo . Inn. da Imola . Pellegrino Tibald Parmigianlno . Lod. Carracci . Agos. Carracci. Ann. Carracci . Albani . Guido Reni Guercino . 243 132 169 170 170 225 255 263 266 266 288 381 404 405 406 407 428 481 482 482 487 489 491 S. Cecilia : Francia ........ 264 Lorenzo Costa .... 266 z3 514 LIST OF I'LACES KEFERRED TO. Page Convent of S. Domenico : Petrus Johaimis . . . . 170 Ercolani Palace : Franco Bologuese . . . 169 6'. Giacotno (Bentivoglio Chapel) : Lorenzo Costa .... 225 Cefalu. Duomo : Mosaics Page 76 Francia 263 Madonna della Mezzaratta : Simone di Bologna . . . Jacobo Paulus . . . . Lorenzo di Bologua . 169 169 170 0. S. Maria fmri la Porta : Niccolo Alunno .... 251 S. Niccolo : Niccolö Alunno .... 251 S. Gemignano. S. Agostino: Benozzo Gozzoli .... 206 S. Andrea (near Gemignano) : Benozzo Gozzoli .... 207 Duomo : Ant. Pollajuolo . . . . 214 Bema 160 Genoa. Brignole Palace : Guercino 492 Doria Palace : Perino del Vaga .... 401 Palace of Marcello Durazzo : Paul Veronese .... 466 S. Stefano : Giulio Romano .... 397 LoDi. S. Agnese: Albertino Piazza .... 231 Martino Piazza . . . . 231 Church dell' Tncoronata (Chapel of St. Anthony) : Albertino Piazza . . . . 231 Martino Piazza .... 231 Callisto Piazza .... 452 LIST OF PLACES KEFERRED TO. 517 Page LOVERE. Art Institution of Count Tadini ; Giacomo Bellini .... 220 Lucca. S. Frediano: Amico Aspertini . . S. Martina : Fra Bartolommeo . S. Romano : Fra Bartolommeo Macerata. Dmmo: Alegrretto di Nuzio 266 316 316 185 Mantua. S. Andrea : Lorenzo Costa 266 Fenno Guisoni .... 399 Castello di Corte (Stanza di Mantegna) 221 Ducal Palace : Giulio Romano .... 398 Palace near the Monastery of S. Se- bastian : Mantegna 221 Palazzo del Te : Giulio Romano .... 398 Primaticcio 400 Matelica (near Fabriano). Franciscan Church: Eusebio di S. Giorgio . . 260 Milan. St. Ambrose : Mosaics 71 note. Ambrogio Borgognone . . 230 Amhrosian Library (or Gallery) : MS. Virgil illuminated by Simone di Martino 158 Leonardo da Vinci . . . 281 Bernardino Luini .... 289 Cesare da Sesto .... 292 Brera : Giotto 132 Gentile da Fabriano Stefano da Ferrara Vincenzio Foppa . Bramantino, giov. Carlo Crivelli . . Gentile Bellini Cima da Conegliano Vittore Cai-paccio . Giovanni Santi Marco Palmezzano Leonardo da Vinci Bernardino Luini . Aurelio Luini . . Marco d'Oggione . Andrea Salaino Bernardo Zenale . Gaudenzio Ferrari Raphael . . Timoteo della Vite Giorgione . Giovanni Cariani . Paul Veronese 463, Guercino Procaccini . Salmeggia . 464, Page . 188 . 225 . 228 . 229 . 233 . 240 . 243 . 245 . 262 . 263 . 279 . 290 . 291 . 291 . 291 . 293 . 294 . 332 . 404 . 432 452 465, 466 . 492 . 495 . 496 Convent of Castellazzo (near Milan) : Marco d' Oggione .... 279 Imperial Palace : Andrea Appiani . S. Maria del Carmine : Procaccini . 511 495 8. Maria delle Grazie : Gaudenzio Ferrari (Refectory) 296 Leonardo da Vinci . . . 278 8. Maria della Passione : Daniele Crespi 496 Duke Melzi's Gallery : Bramantino, giov. . . . 229 Cesare da Sesto .... 293 Raphael 328 Monastero Maygiore (S. Maurizio) : Bernardino Luini .... 290 Bernardino Luini (Refectory) 291 S. Nazaro Grande: Bernardino Lanini . . . 296 518 LIST OF PLACES REFEERED TO. Page S. Pietro in Gessate (Chapel of St. Anthony) : Vincenzio Civerchio vecch. 228 (Ambrose Chapel) : Bernardino Buttinoue . . 228 DiiÄe Scotti's Collection : Cesare da Sesto .... 292 S. Simpliciano : Ambrogio Borgognoue . . 230 S. Sepolcro : Bramantino, giov. . . . 229 Casa Silva : Bernardino Luini .... 290 MOD£NA. Palazzo della Commune : Niccolö dell' Abate ... 400 MoNTEFALCo (neat Fuligno). S, Fortunato : Benozzo Gozzoli .... 206 S. Francesco : Benozzo Gozzoli .... 206 MoNTEFioRE (Papal States). Hospital Oratory: Giovanni Santi .... 262 MoNTEFiORENTixo (near Urbino). Giovanni Santi .... 262 La Motta (between Treviso and Udine). Professor Scarpa's Collection: Raphael 389 Monte Uliveto Maggiore (be- tween Siena and Rome). Monastery : Luca Signorelli . . . . 217 Eazzi 412 Convent of S. Anna : Razzi 412 Naples. Cutaconihs 17 S. Chiara : Francesco di Maestro Simone 190 Duomo : (Cappella Minutoli) : Tommaso degli Stefani . . 118 Page (Cappella Tesoro) : Domenichino 486 Lanfranco 493 S. Domenico Maggiore : (Cappella S. Maitino) : Stefanoue di Maestro Simone Church de" Gerolindni: Luca Giordano 189 508 Church dell' Tncoronata : Giotto 127, 134 S. Giovanni a Carbonara : Leonardo di Bissuccio . . 181 S. Lorenzo Maggiore : Maestro Simone . Antonio Solario . . . . 189 . . 269 S. Martino: Guido Reni .... Finoglia . . . . Luca Giordano . . . . 489 . . 504 . . 508 (In Sacristy) : Lo Spaguoletto . . . . 50o (Cappella S. Bruno) : Stanzioni .... . . 504 Monte Oliveto : Silvestro de' Buoni . Simone Papa, giov. . . . 270 . . 477 S, Severino : Zingaro .... . . 269 Museum (called the Studj Gallery, or Museo Borbonico) Matteo di Giovanni . . 162 Andr. Mantegna . 224 Filippo Jlazzuolo . . . 231 Baitolonimeo Vivarini . 232 Giovanni Bellini . 240 Girol. di Santa Croce 242 Pinturicchio .... 257 Antonio Solario . . . 269 Simone Papa, vecch. 270 Pietro Donzelli 270 Silvestro de' Buoni . . 270 Cesare da Sesto 293 Marcello Yenusti . 306 Michael Angelo . . . 308 LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO. 519 Page Fra Bartolommeo . , . . 317 Raphael 375 Gianfrancesco Peiini . . . 401 Andrea da Salerno . . . 402 Polidoro da Caravaggio . . 404 Garofalo 407 Razzi 413 Annibale Carracci 420, 483, 484 Correggio 422 Parmigianino 428 Sebastian del Piombo . . 436 Lorenzo Lotto 438 Titian 443, 445 Schiavone 451 Bassano 468 Leandro Bassano .... 468 Domenichino 486 Schedone 494 Sassoferrato 494 Lo Spagnoletto .... 503 Andrea Vaccaro .... 505 Salvator Rosa .... 505 Spadaro 507 (Library of Museum) : Giulio Clovio 400 Benvenuto Cellini . . . 400 Pri'iice of Salerno's Collection : Salvator Rosa 505 Iloyal Palace : Raphael 335 S. Severino : (Monastery) : Zingaro 269 Antonio d' Amato il vecchio 270 Gallery of Duke of Terra Nuova : Raphael 334 NOCERA. Principal Church : Niccolo Alunno .... 251 NoVARA. Duomo : Gaudenzio Ferrari . . . 294 Orvieto. Duomo : Ugolino Vieri ... 156 note Ugolino di Preto Ilario 156 note Gentile da Fabriano . . . 186 (Madonna di S. Brizio) : Fiesole 168 Page Benozzo Gozzoli .... 206 Luca Signorelli . . . . 215 Marchese Gualtieri's House : Ingegno 258 Otranto. School of ... . 103 note Padua. S. Anthony : (Chapter House) : Giotto 133 note (Chapel of S. Luke) ; Antonio of Padua . . . . 172 Giovanni of Padua . . . 172 (Cappella S. Felice) : D'Avanzo Veronese . . . 173 Aldighiero da Zevio . . . 173 (Cappella S. Giorgio) : D'Avanzo Veronese . . . 175 Aldighiero da Zevio . . 175 Chapel of Madonna dell' Arena : Giotto 12g Certosa : (Chapel of S. Bruno) : Bramantino, giov. . . . 229 Church deyli Eremitani : Giunto Padovano .... 173 (Chapel of SS. Jacobo e Cristoforo) : Mantegna 222 Bono Ferrarese .... 222 Ansuino 222 Niccold Pizzolo .... 222 »S". Francesco: Gir. di Santa Croce . , . 242 S. Justina: (Sacristy) : II Romanino 454 Sala delta Ragione : Frescoes 179 Scuola del Santo : Titian and pupils .... 449 Parma. Baptistc7-y : Wall paintings .... 103 520 LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO. Page Dm/mo: Correggio 420 S. Giovanni: Correggio 420 Parmigianino 428 Public Gallery : Con-eggio 422 Convent of S. Paolo ; Correggio 419 Church delta Stcccata : Parmigianino 428 Pavia. La Certosa: Ambrogio Borgognone . . 230 Andrea Solario .... 296 Perugia. Academy : Taddeo di Bartolo . . . 160 Benedetto Bonfigli ... 250 Pinturicchio 257 Giannicola 260 iS'. Agostino : Taddeo di Bartolo . . . 161 Fiorenzo di Lorenzo . . . 250 Perugino 256 Eusebio di S. Giorgio . . 260 House of Countess Anna Alf ant : Raphael 330 Casa Baldeschi: Raphael (drawing) . . . 332 Chapel of S. Bernardino Monastery : Benedetto Bonfigli ... 250 S. Caterina (or S. Antonio di Via Superba) : Martinellus 249 Matteo di Gualdo ... 249 Pietro Ant. di Fuligno . . 249 Casa Connestabile : Raphael 330 Collegia del Cambio : Perugino 254 S. Domenico: Fiesole 166 Fra Bartolommeo da Penigia 249 Benedetto Bonfigli ... 249 Page Dimno (Cappella S. Onofrio) : Luca Signorelli .... 217 Federigo Baroccio . . . 476 S. Francesco de' Conventuali : Fiorenzo di Lorenzo . 218, 250 Pisanello (?) 218 Perugino 256 Raphael 342 Orazio Alfani 342 S. Francesco del Monte : Perugino . . . . Palazzo del Consiglio : Benedetto Bonfigli Fioi-enzo di Lorenzo . 255 250 250 S. Pietro : Benedetto Bonfigli . . . 250 Adone Doni 260 L'Aliense 461 Sassoferrato 494 Convent ofSeroiti (now Gymnasium) : Giovanni da Faenza . . . 261 S. Severe : Raphael 336 Pesaro. S. Francesco : Giovanni Bellini . Piacenza. Duomo : Guercino Pisa. Campo Santo: Giovanni Pisano . Orcagna .... Pietro Laurentii . . Antonio Veneziano . Spinello of Arezzo Francesco da Volterra Pietro di Puccio . . Benozzo Gozzoli . (Chapel) : Razzi Duomo : Cimabue .... S. Francesco : Niccola di Pietro • . 240 492 145 145 150 151 151 152 153 206 413 110 153 LIST OF PLACES EEFERRED TO. 521 Page S. Pietro (or S. Bero) in Grado (be- tween Pisa and Leghorn) : Wall paintings . . . . 105 PiSTOJA. Dmmo : Lorenzo di Credi .... 288 Prato. Duomo (Chapel of the Holy Girdle) : Angiolo Gaddi .... 137 Fra Filippo Lippi . , 197, 198 House of Chancellor : Fra Filippo Lippi . . . 198 Franciscan Monastery : Niccola di I'ietro . . . . 154 Tabernacle near S. Margherita : Filippino Lippi .... 204 Ravenna. S. Apollinare in Classe : Mosaics 61 S. Apollinare Nuovo : Mosaics 38 Archiepiscopal Palace (chapel) : Mosaics 40 Camaldolese Monastery (refectory) : Luca Longhi 477 Duomo (Baptistery) : Mosaics 25 Guide Keni 490 Chapel of Empress Galla Placidia : Mosaics 28 S. Giovanni Evangelista : Mosaics 28 S. Maria in Cosmedin (Baptistery of the Arians) : Mosaics 35 S. Michele in Affricisco : Mosaics 35 S. Vitale : Mosaics 35 Rimini. S. Francesco: Piero della Francesca . . 215 Page Rome. ;S'. Aijnese fuori le mura : Mosaics 59 S. Agostino: Raphael 369 Alhano Palace : Perugino 254 S. Andrea della Valle : Domenichino ..... 485 Lanfranco 493 SS. Apostoli : (See Quirinal Palace, and S. Pietro.) Melozzo da Forli .... 227 Barherini Palace : Illuminated MS 94 Raphael 386 After Titian 448 Lanfranco 493 Pietro da Cortona . . . 499 Borghese Palace : Leonardo da Vinci . . 277, 287 Andrea del Sarto .... 321 Domenico Puligo .... 322 Raphael 341 Raphael (ascribed to) . . 389 Giulio Romano .... 399 Innocenzo da Imola . . . 406 Garofalo 407 Dosso Dossi 408 Giambatt. Dossi .... 409 Razzi 414 Correggio ...... 426 Giorgione 430 Sebastian del Piombo . . 435 Palma, vecchio .... 437 Titian 446, 447 Sassoferrato 447 Pordenone 455 Federigo Zuccaro .... 475 Annibale Carracci . . . 483 Domenichino 486 Albani 487 Borgognone 508 Gallery of the Capitol : Mazzolino di Ferrara . . 226 Bernardino de' Conti . . 228 Correggio 422 Guido Keni 490 522 LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO. Pasje Guercino 4-92 Mich. Aug. da Cai-avaggio . 501 (Chapel of Palazzo de' Conser- vator], in Capitol) : Piiituricchio 257 Catacombs 13 Catacomb of S. Calixtus . 13, 14 Pontian Catacombs ... 16 S. Caterina di Siena : Timoteo della Vite . . . 405 S. Cecilia in Trastevere : Mosaics 68 Pinturicchio (?) .... 257 Colonna Palace : Marcello Veuusti .... 309 Domenico Puligo .... 322 Bagnacavallo 405 Palma, vecchio .... 437 Titian 448 Aunibale Carracci . . . 484 Lanfranco 493 Salvator Rosa 506 Alessandro Turclii . . . 509 Corsini Palace : Fiesole 166 Michael Angelo .... 307 Polidoro da Caravaggio . . 403 Lo Spagnoletto .... 503 Salvator Rosa 505 S. Costanza (near Rome) : Mosaics 21, 98 SS. Cosmo e Damiano : Mosaics 31 S. Croce in Gerusalemme : Pinturicchio 257 SS. Quattro Coronati (S. Silvestro Chapel) : Wall paintings .... 98 S. demente : Mosaics 96 (Cappella S. Caterina) : Masaccio 193 Doria Palace : Mazzolino da Ferrara . . 226 Garofalo 407 Titian 443 Page Lodovico Carracci . . . 482 Annibale Carracci . . . 484 Domenichino 487 Farnesina : Raphael 389, 390 Giulio Romano . . 390, 397 Baldassare Peruzzi . 414, 415 Grottaf errata (near Rome) : Domenichino 486 jS'. Francesca Romana : Mosaics 70 Palazzo Farnese : Annibale Carracci . . . 483 Prince Gabrielli's Collection : Raphael 333 *S'. Giorgio on Velahro : Fresco CI S. Gregorio on Monte Celio : (Andrea Cappella, near) : Domenichino 485 Guido Reni 490 (S. Silvia Cappella, near) : Guido Reni 490 S. Giovanni in Laterano : Mosaics 29, 113 Giotto 134 Pisanello 217 (Tabernacle) : Berna 160 (Sacristy) : Marcello Venusti .... 308 (S. Venanzio) : Mosaics 60 Villa Lanti : Giulio Romano .... 397 S. Lorenzo fuori le mura : Wall paintings .... 98 S. Lorenzo in Panisperna : Cati da Jesi 475 Villa Ludovisi : Domenichino 487 Guercino 492 »S". Liiiiji de' Francesi: Francesco Bassano . . . 468 Domenichino 485 LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO. 523 Page (Kemigius Chapel) : Pellegriiio Tibaldi ... 407 Sermoneta 475 Mich. Ang. da Caravaggio . 501 Villa Madama : Giulio Romano .... 397 Giovanni da Udiue . . . 410 Castle of La Magliana : Raphael 367 S. Marco : Mosaics 69 Cai-lo Crivelli 233 S. Maria dell' Anima : Giulio Romano .... 398 Carlo Saraceno .... 502 S. Maria Araceli : Pinturicchio 257 S. Maria dcgli Amjch : Gir. Muziano 454 Domenichino 486 Pompeo Batoni . . . . 511 S. Maria Magyiore : Mosaics .... 27, 113, 114 S. Maria in Cosiiiediii (Sacx-isty) : Mosaics 65 S. Maria sopra Minerva : Mosaics 114 (Cappella Carafa) : Filippino Lippi .... 203 (Chapel of St. Thomas Aquinas) : Raffaellino del Garbo . . 324 S. Maria del la Navicella : Mosaics 69 S. Maria della Pace: Raphael 368 •Timoteo della Vite . . . 369 Bagnacavallo 405 Baldassare Peruzzi . , 415 Sermoneta 474 S. Maria del Popolo : Pinturicchio 257 (Chigi Chapel) : Raphael 370 Sebastian del Piombo . . 435 Page - Gallery : Andrea Solario . . . . 29G Vienna. Gallery of the Belvedei-e : Thomas de JIutina . . . 170 Antonello da Messina . -236 Cesare da Sesto . . . . 293 Fra Paolo da Pistoja . . . 318 Raphael . . . 337, 376, 381 Pelle?rino Tibaldi . . . 407 Corre;^gio . 426 Page Giorgione 430 Palma, vecchio .... 437 Titian .... 440, 445, 446 Schiavone 451 II Moretto 453 Paris Bordone 456 Cristofano Allori .... 497 Salvator Rosa 506 Library : Illuminated MS 44 Ambras Gallery: Mosaic of Last Supper . . 279 Esfterhazy Gallery: Bernardino Luini .... 289 Paris Bordone 456 II. FRANCE. Besan^ox. Cathedral : Fra Bartolommeo Louvre : Taddeo di Bartolo Fiesole .... Fra Filippo Lippi . Pesellino . . . Sandro Botticelli . Benozzo Gozzoli . Ghirlandajo Mantegna . . . Fr. Bianchi Ferrari Giov. Massone Cima da Conegliano Vitt. Carpaccio Niccolo Alunno . Ingegno .... Lorenzo Costa . . Leon, da Vinci . 2 Piero di Cosimo . Marco d'Oggione . Giov. Ant. Beltraffio Andr. Solario . . Dan. da Volterra . Fra Bartolommeo Mariotto Albertinelli Andrea del Sarto . 11 Rosso .323 Rid. Ghirlandajo .... 323 Raphael . . 333, 338, 372, 375, 376, 382, 388, 389 317 161 167 199 199 200 . 207 210 223 . 231 , 231 243 , 246 , 251 258 , 266 281, 284, 285, 286 , 287 . 291 292 \ 296 , 310 . 317 . 318 , 321 Giulio Romano 399 Perino del Vaga 401 Polid. da Caravasgio 403 Correggio . 426 Mich. Ang. Anselmi . . 427 Giorgione . . 430, 431, 432 Seb. del Piombo 434 Palma, vecchio 437 Titian . . 440 441, 442, 443, 446, 448 11 Moretto . . . 453 Tintoretto . 459 460 Paul Veronese . 463, 465 466 Baroccio . . 476 Lod. Carracci . 482 Agost. Carracci 482 Ann. Carracci . 483 484 Domenichino . . 487 Albani . . . 487 Guercino . . 492 Bernard. Campi 495 Domenico Feti , 497 Cristotano Allori 497 Mich. Ang. da Ca ravagg io . 502 Salvator Kosa . . 505 Eoyal Library : Miniatures . 77 , 118, 158, 169, 190 Li^jrary of Arsenal : Illuminated MS. 137 Fontaineblcau : Priraaticcio , , 400 LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO, 531 III. ENGLAND. Paye National Gallery : Leon, da Vinci .... 286 Michael Angelo .... 308 Seb. del Piombo . 308, 434, 436 Raphael .... 333, 340 note Garofalo 408 Correggio .... 425, 426 Parmigianino 428 Giorgione 430, 431 Titian 446 Ann. Carracci 484 Domenichino 487 Royal Academy : Marco d'Oggione .... 279 Leonardo da Vinci . . . 283 Kensiwjton Palace : Giunto Padovano . . . . 172 Pontormo 308 Hampton Court : JIantegna 222 Kapliael 362 Bridgewater Gallery (Earl of Ellesmere) : Raphael . . . 337, 372, 374 Baldassare Periizzi . . . 415 Titian 445, 447 Paris Bordone 457 Tintoretto 460 Btaford Ho-use Gallery (Duke of Sutherland) : Niccolo deir Abate . . . 400 Correggio 425 Titian 445 Moroni 454 Tintoretto 459 Apsley House Gallery (Duke of Wellington) : Correggio 424 Grosvenor Gallery (Marquis of Westminster) : Salvator Rosa 505 Collection of Mr. Rogers : Raphael 336, 372 Bassano 467 note Collection of Mr. Munro : Eapliael .... 374 note, 376 Page Zord Ashbw-toti's Collection : Correggio 419 Giorgion« ...... 430 Lord Ward's Gallery; Fiesole 167 Francia ....... 264 Raphael 328 (In possession of Lord Garvagh) : Raphael 371 (In possession of Duke of Grafton) : After Raphael 389 (In possession of Lord de Grey) : Titian 449 Northumherland House : Titian 448 Devonshire House; Titian . 450 Messrs. Woodhurn : After Michael Angelo . . 307 Mr. Solly's Collection — (now dispersed) : Raphael 342 Bagnacavallo 405 Innocenzo da Imola . . . 406 Cotignola 406 Giorgione 431 Lorenzo Lotto 438 II Moretto 453 Althorp: Perino del Vaga .... 401 Blenheim : Raphael 336 Boicood : Raphael 336 Burleigh House : Pordenone 455 Barron Hill : Raphael 336 Castle Howard: Primaticcio 400 Giorgione 431 Tintoretto 459 Ann. Carracci .... 483, 484 Domenichino 486 2 A 2 532 LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO. Chisuick : Bassaiio 468 Holkham : Bassano 4-68 Lei[/h Court: Raphael 336 After Raphael 387 Panshangcr : Fra Bartolommeo . . . 317 Raphael 339 St rat ton : Raphael 376 Giorgione 4-30 Seb, del Piombo .... 435 Warwick Castle : Raphael 388 Page Lord Northidck's Collection : Giulio Romano .... 399 Alton Towers : II Gobbo 493 Cambridge. Fitzwilliam Museum : Giorgione 431 Titian 445 Liverpool Institution : Don Silvestro 139 Simone di Martino . . . 157 Masaccio 196 Pesellino 199 After Slichael Angelo . . 307 IV. BELGIUM. ; Antwerp. Museum: Antonello da Messina 236 Gallery of the Hague ; Leonardo da Vinci V. HOLLAND. 282 Collection of Kiivj of Holland: Leonardo da Vinci (drawings) 279 Cathedral: VI. BOHEMIA. Prague. , . . . Thomas de Mutina 170 VII. RUSSIA. St. Petersburg. Hermitage : Leon, da Vinci .... 283 Raphael .... 340, 342, 372 Correggio 422 Seb. del Piombo .... 434 II Moretto 453 Prince Narischkin : Domenichino 486 KlEEF. 8. Sophia : Frescoes 86 VIII. SPAIN. Escurial Palace : Raphael 340, 379 Titian 443 Madrid Gallery : Raphael . . , Titian , , , 375, 376, 382 445. 446. 449 LIST OF PLACES REFERRED TO. 533 IX. SICILY. Page MoNREALE (near Palermo). Mosaics 76 Monrealese 507 Palermo. Cliapel of King Roger : I\Iosaics S. Maria deW Ammiraglio : Mosaics Pas'© 76 76 X. GREECE. Monastery Church of Daphne, near Athens : Mosaics Island of Chio. Church of the Basilians : Mosaics 87 87 Mount Helicon, St. Luke: Mosaics 87 Island of Salamis. Church of the Panagia Phanerowiicnc: Frescoes .,..,, 88 NAMES OF ARTISTS. 414 Abate, Niccol» dell' Agi, Andrea Cordelle Alamanus, Johannes D"Alba, Älacrino . . Albani, Francesco . Albertinelli, Mariotto Alfani, Domeuico di Paris , Orazio . . AHbrando, Girolamo AUegri, Antonio . . , Pomponio Allori, Alessandro . , Cristofano . Alunuo, Niccolo . . Amalteo, Pomponio . Ainato, Antonio di, il vecchio Anguisciola, Sofonisba . Anselmi, Michael Angelo Ansuiuo Antonio of Padaa . . Apollonius Appiani, Andrea . . . Arezzo, ^Nlargheritone di , Spinello di . . Arpino, il Cavaliere d' . Aspertini, Amico . . , Guido . . . Assisi, Tiberio di . . B. Baglione, Giovanni .... 477 Bagnacavallo 405 Baldovinetti, Alessio . . . 208 Barbacelli, Bernardino . . . 474 Barbarelli, Giorgio .... 430 Barbieri, Giovanni Francesco 491 Baroccio, Federigo, di Urbino 476 Bartolo, Domeuico di . . .161 , Taddeo di . . . .160 Basaiti, Marco 244 Bassano, Francesco .... 408 , Jacopo 467 , Leandro 468 Batoni, Pompeo 511 Batlaglie, Michael Angelo delle 507 Beccafumi, Domenico . . .414 Page 400 241 183 231 487 317 2G0 260 293 416 427 474 497 250 456 270 495 427 222 172 107 511 IIS 151 476 266 266 260 Belletto, Antonio , Bernardo , Belliui, Gentile . , Giacomo , Giovanni Beltraffio, Giovau Antonio Beuvenuti, Giambattista , Pietro . . Berna, or Bai'na . . . Bemazzano .... Betto, Bernardino di Bicci, Lorenzo di . . Biliverti, Antonio . . Bissolo, Pier Francesco Bissuccio, Leonardo di . Bologna, Cristoforo di . , Lorenzo di . , Michele Mattei da , , Niccolo di Bolognese, Franco . , Vitale . Bonfigli, Benedetto . Bonifazio .... Bouviciuo, Alessandro Bonzi, Pietro Paolo . Bordone, Paris . . Borgognoue, AmbrogioFossano Jacopo Cortese . Botticelli, Sandro .... Bramantino, giov , vecch. . . . Bresciauino, Andrea del . Bresciano, Giovita . . . Bronzino, Angiolo . . . Buffalmacco, Buonamico . Bugiardini, Giuliano Buouaccorsi, Pierino . . Buonarotti, Michael Angelo Buoni, Silvestro de' . Buoninse^na di (see Duccio) Buttinone, Bernardino . . Page 510 510 240 220 237 292 409 511 160 292 256 154 497 241 181 170 170 182 169 169 169 249 450 452 493 456 229 508 199 228 228 267 455 473 145 288 401 297 270 115 228 c. Cagliari, Carlo 466 . , Paolo 461 Cagnacci, Guido 491 Calabrese, il Cavaliere . • . 504 NAMES OF ARTISTS. 535 Page Caldara, Polidoro .... 403 Calderari 456 Caligarino 409 Calvi, Lazzaro 401 , Pantaleo 401 Cambiaso, Luca 477 Camerino, Jacobus de . . .113 Cammucciui, Vincenzio . .511 Campagnola, Domenico . . 451 Campi, Antonio 495 ■ , Bernardino .... 495 , Giulio 495 Cauale, Antonio 510 Canaletto 510 Cautarini, Simone . . . .491 Canuti, Domenico . . . .491 Caracciolo, Giambattista . . 504 Caravaggio, Michelangelo Amerighi da 500 , Polidoro da . . 403 Cariani, Giovanni .... 452 Carotto, Gianfrancesco . . .415 Carpaccio, Vittore .... 244 Carracci, Agostino . . . .479 , Annibale .... 479 , Lodovico .... 479 Carucci, Jacopo 322 Castagno, Andrea del . . . 212 Castiglione, Gio. Benedetto . 510 Catena, Vincenzio .... 242 Cavallini, Pietro 139 Cavedone, Giacomo .... 493 Cerano, U 49G Cerquozzi, Michael Augelo . 507 Cerva, Giovanni Battista . . 296 Cesare, Giuseppe .... 476 Cesi, Bartolommeo .... 477 Ciampelli, Agostino . . .475 Cignani, Carlo 488 Cigoli, Ludovico Cardi da . 496 Cimabue, Giovanni . . . .109 Cione, Andrea 145 , Bernardo 148 Civerchio, Vincenzo, giov. . 230 ■ , vecch. . 228 Clovio, Giulio 400 Conca, Sebastiauo . . . .510 Concgllano, Giambatt. Cima da 243 Contarini, Giovanni . . . 509 Conti, Bernardino de' (de Co- mitibus) 228 Corenzio, Belisario .... 504 Correggio 416 Cortona, Pietro Berettini da . 499 Cosimo, Piero di 287 Page Cosmato, Giovanni . . . .114 Cosme, II 225 Cossa, Francesco 225 Costa, Lorenzo 225 Cotignola, Gir. Marchesi da . 406 Coxcie, Michael 410 Credi, Loi-enzo di . . . . 288 Crespi, Daniel 496 , Giov. Batt 496 Crivelli, Carlo 233 D. Dalmasio, Lippo di . . . .169 Dante, Girolamo (di Tiziano) 450 David 511 Diamante, Fra 198 Diana, Benedetto .... 246 Dolce, Carlo 498 Domenichino 485 Doni, Adone 260 , Alfani 260 Donzelli, Ippolito .... 269 , Pietro 269 Dossi, Dosso 408 , Giovan Battista . . 408 Duccio di Buoninsegna . .115 E. Empoli, Jacopo da . 498 F. Fabriano, Gentile da . . .185 , Gritto da . . . .185 Faenza, Giovanni da . . . 261 , Jacomone di . . .410 Falcone, Aniello 505 Farinato, Paolo 461 Fassalo, Bernardino . . . 293 Fattore, II 401 Feltre, Lorenzo Luzzo da . .437 Ferrara, Stefano da . . . .225 Ferra rese, Bono . . , . .222 Ferrari, Francesco Bianchi {U Frari) 231 , Gaudenzio .... 293 Ferri, Ciro . . . . . . .510 Feti, Domenico 497 Fiammingo, Dionisio . . . 477 Fiesole, BeatoFra Augelico da 163 Figino, Ambrogio .... 296 Finoglia, Domenico .... 504 Fiore, Colantouio del . . .190 536 xa:mes of artists. Fiore, Jacobello del . Fiori, Mario de' . . Florigerio, Sebastiano Fontana, Lavinia , Prospero . Foppa, Vincenzo, giov. , vecchio Forli, Melozzo da . . Francesca, Piero della . Franceschini, Baldassare Francia, Francesco . . Franciabigio, Marc' Antonio Franco, Battista (II Semolei) Fuligno, Niccolo di . . . , Pietro Antonio di Fungai, Bernardino . Furini, Francesco . . . G. Gaddi, Angiolo . , Gaddo . . , Taddeo . Galassi, Galasso . Gambara, Lattanzio Gandiui, Giorgio Garbo, Ifaifaellino del Gargiuoli, Domenico Garofalo .... Gatta, Don Bartolommeo Gatti, Bernardino Gcnga, Girolamo Gennari, Benedetto Genovese, 11 Prete Gessi .... Gherardo di Firenze Gliirlandajo, Benedetto , Davide , Domeuico , lüdolfo Giamliono, Michiel . Giannicola (Manui) . Giolfino, Niccolo Giordano, Luca . . Giorgione .... Giottino .... Giotto Giovanni, Berto di . Gioveuone, Girolamo Gobho, II, da' Frutti Gozzoli, Benozzo Granacci, Francesco Grandi, P>cole . . Grim aid i, Francesco Gualdo, Matteo di . della Page 183 . 510 , 43f> 477 . 477 230 228 227 215 49S 263 321 457 250 249 267 498 137 114 135 225 455 427 323 507 407 211 427 260 492 505 491 211 211 211 207 323 183 260 461 508 429 138 122 260 230 493 205 211 226 493 249 Page Gubbio, Oderigi di . . . .185 Guercino 491 Guisoni, Fermo 399 , Kinaldo .• ... 399 I. Ibi, Sinibaldo 260 Imola, Innocen/o da . . . 405 Ingannati, Pietro degli . . .241 Ingegno 258 J. Jesi, Pasquale Cati da . . . 475 Johanuis, Petrus 170 Lama, Giambernardo Lanfranco, Giovanni Lanini, Bernardino Laurentii, Pietro . Lauri, Filippo . . Lazzari, Donato . Liberale . . . Liberi, Pietro . . Libri, Girolamo dai Licinio, Bernardino Liouardo, detto II Pistoj Lippi, Filippino . , Fra Filippo Lomazzo, Giovanni Paolo Longbi, Luca . , Pietro Lorenzo, Andrea di , Fiorenzo di Lotti, Carlo . . Lotto. Lorenzo . Luigi, Andrea. Luini, Aurelio . Bernardino Luti, Benedetto . 402 492 296 150 510 228 246 509 247 456 402 202 196 296 477 510 159 250 510 438 258 291 289 510 M. Maestro Simone 189 . , Francesco di 189 , Stefanone di 189 , 230 . 211 , 474 . 246 221 224 244 , 437 MagTii, Cesare Mainardi, Bastiano . Manetti, Domenico . Mansueti, Giovanni . Mantegna, Andrea . , Francesco Marcone, Marco . . Marconi, Eocco . . NAMES OF ARTISTS. 537 Page Martiiiellus 249 Martino Nello, Ottaviano di . 188 , Simone di . . . .150 Marullo, Giuseppe .... 504 Marziale, Marco 244 Masaccio 192 Massone, Giovanni . . . .231 Matteis, Paolo de . . . .510 Mazzolino, Lodovico . . . 226 Mazzuolo, Filippo . . . .231 Melano, Giovanni da . . .139 Melanzio, Francesco . . . 260 Meizi, Francesco 292 Mengs, Kaphael 511 Messina, Antonello da . . . 236 Milano, Andrea da ... . 230 Miretto, Giovanni .... 179 Modena, Barnaba da . . .171 , Pellegrino da . . .410 , Toniniaso da . . .170 Mola, Giovanni Battista . . 487 , Pier Francesco . . .487 Monaco II, Don Lorenzo . .163 Monrealese 507 Montagna, Bartolommeo . . 245 Moretto, II 452 Moro, II 436 , Giambattista dal . . .461 Morone, Francesco .... 246 Moroni, Giovanni Battista . 453 Mugello, Benedetto da . . . 165 Murano, Antonio da . . . .183 , Giovanni da . . . 183 Muziano, Girolamo .... 454 N. Naldini, Battista 474 Negroponte, Fra Antonio da . 233 Nelli, Plautilla 318 Neroui, Bartolommeo . . . 414 Novelli, Pietro 507 0. Oggione, Marco d' . . . .291 L'Olmo, Giovanni Paolo . . 437 L'Orbetto 509 Orcagna 146 Orsi, Lelio 427 L'Ortolano 409 Pacchiorotto, Jacopo Padovauino, II . . 267 509 Padovano, Giunto . , . .171 Padua, Giovanni di . . . .172 Pagani, Gregorio .... 497 Palma, Jacopo, giov. . . . 508 , vecch. . . 436 Palmezzano, Marco, di Forli. 263 Panetti, Domenico .... 227 Panicale, Masoliuo da . . .192 Panini, G. Paolo 510 Papa, Simone, giov 477 , Simone, vecch. . . . 270 Parentiuo, Bernardo. . . . 224 Paris Alfaui, Domenico di . 260 Parmigianino 427 Passeri, Giambattista . . . 487 Passerotti, Bartolommeo . .477 Passignano, Domenico da . .497 Paulus, Jacobo 169 Pellegrino Pellegrini . . . 406 Pennacchi, Pier Maria . . .241 Penni, Gianfrancesco . . ,401 Pens, Georg 410 Perugino, Pietro . , . .252 Peruzzi, I3aldassare . . . .414 Pesello, Franc, di (Pesellino) 199 . Giuliano di . . . .199 Piazza, Albertino . . , .231 -, Callisto 452 , Martino 231 Pietro, Niccola di . . . .153 , Niccolo di . . . .182 Pino, Marco di 474 Pinturicchio 256 Piombo, Fra Sebastian del . 434 Pippi, Giulio 396 Pisano, Giovanni 145 , Vittore 217 Pistoja, Fra Paolo da . . .318 Pizzolo, Niccolo 222 Pollajuolo, Antonio . . . .214 , Pietro . , . ,214 Pomarance, il Cav. delle . . 476 Ponte, Francesco da . . . 468 , Jacopo da .... 467 , Leandi'o da ... . 468 Pontormo 322 Pordenone, Giovanni Antonio Licinio Regillo da . . . 455 Porta, Baccio della .... 315 Prete Ilario, Ugolino di 156, note Preti, Maria 504 Previtali, Andrea .... 243 Primaticcio 406 Procaccini, Camillo .... 495 , Ercole .... 495 538 xa:mes of artists. Paj,'e Procaccini, Giulio Cesare . . 495 Pucci, Pietro di 133 Puligo, Domenico .... 322 , Jaeone 322 Pupini, Biagio 405 R. Raibolini, Francesco , Giacomo . , , Giulio . . Raimondi, Marcantonio Ramenghi, Bartolonimeo Raphael . . . Raviguano, Marco Razzi, Gianautouio Reui, Guido . . Ribera, Giuseppe Ricci, Domenico . , Marco . . Ricciarelli, Daniele Riccio, Maestro . . Pietro . . Ridolfi, Carlo . . Robusti, Jacopo . Romauelli, Gianfranco Romaniuo. Girolamo il Romano, Giulio . Roncalli, Cristoforo Rosa, Salvator Rosselli, Cosimo . , Matteo . Rossi, Francesco de' Rosso, II . . . Rotari, Pietro Rusuti, Philippus S. Sabbatiui, Andrea . . , Lorenzo . . Sacchi, Andrea , . . , Pietro Francesco Salaino, Andrea . . . Salerno, Andrea da . . Salimlieni, Arcangiolo . Salmeggia, Enea . . . Salvi, Giovanni Battista Sammachini, Orazio Santa Croce, Francesco da . Girolamo di Santafede, Fabrizio . . , Francesco , S. Gimignano, Vincenzio di Santi, Giovanni .... 263 265 265 411 405 324 411 412 488 503 461 510 309 414 293 509 457 510 454 396 476 505 204 498 473 322 510 114 402 477 488 230 291 402 474 496 494 477 242 242 402 402 410 261 Page S. Giorgio, Eusebio di . . . 260 S. Giovanni, Giovanni di . . 498 S. Severino, Jacopo di . . .188 , Lorenzo di . .188 Sanzio, Raphael 324 Saraceno, Carlo 502 Sarto, Andrea del . . . .318 Sassoferrato 494 Savoldo, Geronimo .... 452 Schedone, Bartolommeo . . 493 Schiavooe, Andrea . . . .451 , Gregorio . . . 224 Schizzone 410 Sebastian!, Lazzaro .... 246 Semenza 491 Semini, Andrea 477 , Ottavio . . . .477 Semitecolo, Niccolo . . .182 Sermoneta, Gir. Siciolante da 474 Sesto, Cesare da 292 Siena, Marco da 474 , Matteo da 162 , Ugolino da . . 156, no