TRUTH'S CONFLICTS TRUTH'S TRIUMPHS. ESSAYS. TRUTH'S CONFLICTS AND TRUTH'S TRIUMPHS; OB, THE SEVEN-HEADED SERPENT SLAIN: tf 0f WITH AN ALLEGORICAL INTRODUCTION ON SOME CHIEF ERRORS OP THE DAT BY STEPHEN JENNER, M.A. LONDON : LONGMANS, BROWN, GREEN, AND LONGMAN, PATERNOSTER ROW. 1854. LONDON ! PRINTED BT FETTER AND GALPIN, PLAYHOUSE YARD, ADJOINING THE "TIMES" OFFICE. TO ALL WHO, IN AN AGE OF CONTENTION, ARE SEEKING TO FIND THE TRUTH, arc PREFACE. IN constructing an allegory as an introduction to the following Essays, the author has had respect to the common prejudice against whatever appears to be personal. It was necessary for him to exhibit the errors with which he had to conflict, and this he thought would be the most inoffensive mode, and also the safest, of bringing them before the reader, upon the principle of the motto he has chosen, Diligite homines : interfidte errores. It has not been his desire to expose any in- dividuals to shame, and therefore he has suppressed the names of the writers out of whose works he has gathered his examples of false doctrine and pernicious sentiment. In this he has also been actuated by a directly opposite consideration to that which influenced Pascal, in his celebrated Provincial Letters, exposing the dark and destructive subtleties of the Jesuits. He gave the names of the authors whom he quoted, and when questioned as to his reason for it, he made answer" If I lived in a city where there were a dozen fountains, and I certainly knew there was one which was poisoned, I should be obliged to advertise all the world to draw no water from that fountain; and as they might think it was a pure V X PREFACE. imagination on my part, I should be obliged to name him who had poisoned it, rather than expose all the city to the danger of being poisoned by it." Begging the great philosopher's pardon, however good this reason might be for him to act upon in his day, our observation has led us to adopt the reverse ; for such is the morbid curiosity of mankind in general to taste forbidden fruit, that you have only to proclaim a book to be a bad book, to set all men reading it. We think it much wiser, therefore, not thus to advertise other men's errors, but only to exhibit a glass in which they may be seen. It is the remark of an old writer, that " there is not a better, more vehement, or mightier thing to make a man understand withal, than an allegory." (Tyndale.) The author trusts that this will prove to be not theory but reality, in regard to the allegory which he has constructed, every circumstance of which is intended to have a hidden meaning. The same writer says that "allegories make a man quick- witted." It is to exercise the wit of the ingenious, and at the same time to amuse the lovers of the grotesque in fancy, such a creature as a seven- headed serpent has been imagined, to symbolise the spirit of error ; and it may perhaps afford no unprofit- able employment to those who are fond of mystery, to set themselves to trace out the relation of the seven heads of this monstrum horrendum, to the seven heads of discussion taken up in the seven subsequent Essays. PREFACE. XI With regard to the imaginary Discourse, supposed to have been heard in a dream, which the author has introduced into this part of his work, he may state that it is no dream; but though fictitious as to its form, it is not fictitious in fact. Startling as some of the sentiments propounded in it may appear, they are all such as he has either read with his own eyes, or heard with his own ears; and he could, he believes, verify every one of them, if required, by a reference to the books and pages where they are to be found, for the most part in the very same words, in the writings of men who either were at the time the extracts were made, or still are (oh, tell it not in Gath!) ministers in our own Israel. It is not, however, the author begs to observe, that all these false principles were ever advanced in any one Dis- course by any one man (it would be unjust to allow any person to suppose that) : they are brought together here as parts of a system, the whole of which, as a system, is being daily taught in our Reformed Church. The many passages that stand in it word for word as they are to be found in their original authors, he has not marked with inverted commas, because, as it was necessary in some instances slightly to alter the wording (without, however, altering the sense), to fit it in with the adjoining sentences, to have so marked only the passages adopted literally, would have given a very unfair representation of the whole amount of error that required to be exposed. Should any one, whose standing entitles him to do Xll PREFACE, so, have the temerity to challenge the author to pro- duce his literce scriptce proofs that such sentiments as he has here woven into a sermon, have ever been propounded by professed Protestant divines, he is pre- pared to say, "This will I do, audmore also." He has felt impelled to enter on a contest with these errors, because he knows they are widely diffused, and often most unsuspectingly received and entertained. Both the imaginary Discourse in the introductory Allegory, and the one in the Reveil, or waking dream, at the close, are intended only as types of their kind ordinary examples of the teaching, both as to doc- trine and style of address, of the two Schools to which their respective deliverers are supposed to belong. To point these out by name is needless. The Essays are, more properly speaking, to be regarded as expressing the sentiments of the author. And if, in these attempts to secure to Truth its right- ful triumphs, he has advanced anything which appears new or paradoxical, or which runs counter to received opinions, let not the reader at once dismiss the dis- cussion, but weigh well the principles enunciated, and the arguments by which they are supported, lest per- adventure he should reject eternal Truth for to-day's passing opinion. It follows not that a principle is not right because it happens not to be recognised. Truth, let it be remembered, has seldom been recog- nised at the time of its birth, but often has met with no better resting place than a manger, though it is ever entitled to the most honourable reception. PREFACE. Xiii The author must confess to having taken the " profane " liberty, as it is deemed by some men, of thinking for himself upon the several subjects treated of in these Essays ; and he now puts forth these independent thoughts of his own in the hope that they may supply some little glimmering of light to guide others. For some of his ideas in the Essay on the " Power of Faith," he feels bound to acknowledge himself indebted to Archdeacon Hare's Sermons, en- titled the " Victory of Faith " (he may state this, he trusts, without being considered as committing him- self to all his opinions) ; but for the most part, in the rest of the Essays, he has had to trace his way through untravelled regions, where no footprints of others marked the path ; the principles, therefore, evolved in these, may be regarded almost wholly as the fruit of his own reflections. His chief aim has been to meet what may be termed the mind of the age to correct its erring tendencies by setting in antagonistic attitude to them Heaven's divinely provided counter- vailing truths. Whether he has succeeded in this is a point which it rests not with him to determine. But being convinced of the fact, he has endeavoured, according to the power given to him, to make mani- fest the truth of what Lord Bacon observes, that " there is a wide difference between the idols of the human mind and the ideas of the Divine mind." To deprecate criticism either from his style, or his mode of treating his subjects, would be as vain as it would be unreasonable : if these are faulty, they XIV PREFACE. ought to receive correction : all that the author asks, as being all that he has a right to expect, is that judgment which is tempered by charity. If what he has written be trash, he would be the first to say, "Let it not be spared;" but if it be truth, he trusts it will be respected. He has studied rather accura- cies of sentiment than elegancies of expression. To plant flowers around the edge of the well of truth is at all times easy work; he has endeavoured rather (and this is far more laborious), to draw up the cool fresh spring water, by the drinking of which others may be invigorated. To the members of the Camden congregation, among whom the author has had the honour to minister for nearly six years, these Essays will, he hopes, be a lasting memento of the principles which he has, from time to time only less fully, and in a somewhat different form propounded from the pulpit, and serve to keep them abidingly in their remem- brance, as guiding-posts by the road-side of their earthly pilgrimage to (God grant that it may be) a blissful eternity. To the public at large he submits them, in the belief that they will be found to set forth and defend those truths which lie at the basis, both of individual happiness and of national stability. For any good effect to attend them, he trusts wholly (to adopt the words of his favourite poet) to Him " Whose frown can disappoint the proudest strain, Whose approbation prosper even mine." CAMBERWEU,, September 1, 1854. TABLE OF CONTENTS, INTRODUCTION. THE DREAM, AN ALLEGORY 1 CHAPTER I. THE Disco VEBY, OB THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR 23 CHAPTER II. THE ENCOUNTER, OR THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH 65 CHAPTER 111. THE SUSPENSE, OR SACRAME^AL EFFICACY 88 CHAPTER IV. THE RENEWED ONSET, OR SYMBOLISM TESTED 123 CHAPTER V. THE CONFLICT, OR THE TRUE CROSS 193 CHAPTER VI. THE FIGHT, OR THE POWER OF FAITH 236 CHAPTER VII. THE VICTORY, OR THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY 268 CONCLUSION. THE REVEIL, OH THE DREAM DISPERSED 300 APPENDIX. Note A ON HIEROGLYPHICS 331 Note B. ON ANALOGY 337 Note C. ON IDOLATRY 346 CORRIGENDA. At page 13, line 8. For " cancel " read Chancel." 52, 8. The words " breaks not " have got out of place : they should follow immediately after the word " Error" in line 7. 125, 1. Add "in common," after "be anything." 128, 21 For " consequences " read " consequence." 336 (note) For the word " Lexicon " read " Sermon." THE DREAM. AN ALLEGORY. A SEEPENT, which had by some means crept into a house, had coiled itself up under a couch where a man lay down and slept, for a length of time, unaware of his danger. In his slumbers (such was the effect of the vital warmth of the serpent upon the brain of the sleeper) he dreamed a strange, at first pleasant, at length troubled dream, full of mystery. It opened upon him in the form of a vision. Ye who can discern the subtleties of error under the drapery of fiction, and gather lessons of truth from the picturings of fancy, read and understand. Our dreamer saw, or seemed to see, a rich and beautiful valley stretching out before him, shut in on both sides by a range of lofty mountains. This valley was so wide and extensive, that it looked at first sight like a vast plain, within the compass of which might lie several separate states. But the mountains which bounded it, dimly seen in the distance, and which were the battlements provided by nature to protect it against the incursions of foreign foes, closed it in, and constituted it a little kingdom by itself. Thickly- peopled towns and villages lay everywhere couching behind its woods and in its hollows, discernible only B tt 2 THE DKEAM AN ALLEGORY. by the thin light smoke which curled up in spiral volumes from them to the skies. The whole scenery was very fine and varied, the ground continually undulating in gentle slopes, and every higher ridge of it being tufted with trees : the soil bore the marks of the best tillage, so that green corn fields and meadows, and gardens blushing with every kind of fruit that can regale the taste, or minister to the Wants of man, enamelled the surface. Here and there were seen peeping out neat looking houses, from which were heard to issue the voices of happy inhabitants. Signs of industry ^cleanliness, order, and prosperity, indeed, appeared to pervade every depart- ment of this favoured region. Cattle of all kinds, and of the finest quality, from the solemn ox that chews the cud, to the frisking goat that bounded from hill to hill, with flocks of fleecy white sheep, reposed under its trees, or dotted its pastures. Rivers and streams of water glided and glistened in meandering cur- rents, like threads of silver on a ground-work of green, through the vales and meadows, fertilising and refresh- ing every part through which they passed. The sun was just setting over this happy valley from a clear, bright, blue sky at the time of the vision, and this gave a softened loveliness to the whole scene. As the monarch of the skies slowly descended in the west, paling more and more his fiery lustre, and the light fell on every object in the mild beauty of departing day, it looked the very picture of paradise restored : but while our dreamer was rapt in admiration at the THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 3 sight, a mist gathered over the valley, and in the mist " A fabric huge Hose, like an exhalation, " realising, in effect, the Poet's idea, when he wrote, " Giant error, darkly grand, Overshadowed all the land." This fabric was a magnificent temple. For some time he could not distinctly catch the character of this huge building. Solid and vasty only appeared the structure, as it lay half hid in its own deep long cast shadows. But as the light of the moon, which was now ascending from the east in full orbed splendour, broke in its brightness over the stupendous pile, its imposing grandeur and artful finishing stood out in bold relief. With towers tapering up to the skies, and pinnacles wrought about on all sides with the most exquisite touches of architectural skill, it looked the work of angelic hands. Our dreamer, in the visions of his fancy, drew near to gaze more closely upon it, and to ascertain its use. From its outward features he could not determine whether it was built for a Christian, or a Pagan, a Popish, or a Protestant purpose, But, as he came nigh, he heard the sweetest sounds of choral music issuing from its portals* Perceiving the great west door to be open, he enters. A long stretching central aisle lies before him, through the distant east window of which the beams of the moon, passing through deep-stained glass, shed " a dim religious lustre" over the whole building. Every part of it, and every prominent feature, 4 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. where the view was not obstructed by pillars, thus became softly visible, sleeping, as it were, in its own beauty. So overpowering was the impression made by its vastness and grandeur, that a soul-subduing feel- ing of awe came over him, and he involuntarily bowed himself down in adoration though he knew not of what. When he has in some degree recovered from his awe-stricken bewilderment, with soft and silent footstep he treads the long drawn aisle towards the end where the worship is proceeding. At every step fresh objects of surprise open upon his view ; piers, arch behind arch ; windows, light behind light ; arcades, shaft behind shaft : deep transepts cross his course and attract his sidelong glance: over his head strides the vaulted roof, from the corbels and cornices of which angel-faces gaze down upon him with fixed and passionless eye. On every hand, from niches and canopies, images and figures of saints, shrined in their own shadows, look out like spirits from the unseen world and startle him, as if he were walking in the catacombs of the dead, just erecting themselves out of their stiff, cold resting- places into lithe life. With wistful wonder he pursues his way, eager to reach the part where the sacred solemnities are being celebrated, and from which the strains that he had heard from without were still pouring in floods of liquid melody, now rising in full- toned chorus, now dying down in softest cadence, sending a thrill of seemingly- devotional rapture through his whole frame, making him ever and anon THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 5 pause and listen, like one spell-bound. At length he reaches the part where the worshippers are gathered. It is a sort of interior chapel, closed in by a richly carved screen. Through this he passes, gazing. On the altar at the east end, he sees a number of illu- minated books resting recumbent on their little hidden lecturns; two large wax candles are also burning there ; and between them at the back stands a large gilded cross. It was the hour of vespers, or " even-song." When the singing had ceased, there was a solemn pause, and all bowed down. From a natural curi- osity he cast his eyes around to watch the scene. He observed, projecting from the wall at the side, a solid stone pulpit, to which there was a spiral stair- case winding sinuously, the middle part of which only bulged into sight, while both the beginning and the end of it was invisible. The shadow of some form fell, and flitted in a moment again from sight, over the part which jutted into view ; and in an instant after, a saintly-looking man, tall, pale, and thin, appeared above, robed in white, who, after repeating a certain form of words (it hardly seemed a prayer), gave out a passage from the Bible it was his text. The words which he had chosen to discourse upon were these : " That ihou niayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth." (I Timothy iii. 15.) The preacher at once proceeded to expound this portion of Holy Writ, And thero \vas such a 6 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. quiet earnestness in his manner ; his tone of voice was so winningiy gentle and musical; his be- haviour was so reverent ; he carried in his look such an air of deadness to the world, and every now and then crossed his arms upon his breast, and lifted up his eyes with such devoutness to heaven, that our dreamer's attention was quickly riveted. So much did his vision seem like a reality, that he distinctly remembered, as if he actually heard the preacher address the congregation as follows : " Beloved Brethren, We are taught by this passage of Holy Scripture truths of the deepest importance-- truths which he at the very foundation of all Christian religion. We are here instructed by the Holy Apostle how to regard our Holy Mother the Church. She is here declared, you will observe, to be ' the pillar and ground of the truth/ She is ' the pillar and ground of the truth,' because from her, and from her alone, we derive any sure knowledge of what is the truth. She is God's appointed witness to the truth, testifying by her own (ail-but) infallible interpretations of the Scripture what is to be believed. Christ promised to be always with his Church. This is her security. This ensures to you that whatever she teaches shall be the truth. Those who take the Bible alone as their rule of faith, and presume to interpret it by their own private judgment, run into all sorts of heresies and errors, which proves that the Scripture, apart from the interpretation of the Church, is an unsafe guide. THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 7 It is a common mistake of these modern days to think that the Bible can interpret itself ; it is a book full of (Jeep mysteries, the key to which God has given to none but his Church. It is, therefore, calculated of itself only to lead into error. God's Holy Church is the mystical oracle, so to speak, by which His will is clearly made known to men, and the faithful ever receive the law at her mouth. From her they learn to believe all the articles of the Apostles' creed ; in God the Father who made heaven and earth; in God the Son, that he was bom of the Blessed Virgin Mary; in God the Holy Ghost, by whom we are regenerated in the holy waters of Baptism; in the Holy Catholic Church, and the like. This creed has been taught by the Church for 1,800 years, as that which the Apostles taught and believed. The Church has received many things from the Apostles, which we can learn only from her. St. Paul- says in one place, * Continue tlwu in the things which thou hast learned) and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them.' We know that we have learned these things from the Church, and that they were taught to the Apostles by Christ himself; therefore we ought to continue in our faith, and never to doubt that it is the true faith. For the true faith has always been kept by the Church, as being ' the pillar and ground of the truth.' Indeed, truth has nothing to rest upon without the Church she is its sole sup- port. Her authority, therefore, is a sufficient ground, and the only proper ground, for belief. Whatever she 8 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. teaches is to be received as truth. Whatever she condemns is to be renounced as damnable error. Without her decision we could have no certainty as to what doctrines were to be found in the Scriptures, and believed. The sacred doctrine of the Trinity for example, original sin, the mystery of the Incarna- tion, the saving efficacy of the Sacraments, and the like, no man could ever have ascertained from read- ing the Bible by himself. It is the Church that has developed these out of the sacred obscurity in which they lie hidden in the written Scriptures, and has handed them down by Tradition. It is thus that we are * assured of them, knowing of whom we have learned them.' We could not have been certain even that the written Scriptures are the Word of God, had not the Church determined it ; and if we receive the Scriptures themselves upon her authority, much more ought we to receive her interpretation of them. Seeing, then, brethren, that you have such a sure foundation for your faith, you will learn to rely upon the Church's teaching, in all things, with an unquestioning assurance. " But the expression in our text, ' That tlwu mayst know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the Souse of God' shows that we shall be following the example of apostolic teaching, as we ought, having apostolic authority, if we instruct you how to regard the Church and all that appertains to it its ministers, its ordinances, its holy round of appointed services, and the like. Let me, then, teach you in what estimation these are all to be held; how viewed, and how used. THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 9 " You have heard already how our Holy Mother is to be regarded as respects the security of our faith. Now that endearing term, Mother, so aptly applied to her, reminds us that there are many kind offices which she performs towards her children. First, it is through her we are born unto Christ. She gives us spiritual life in Holy Baptism, and she nourishes that life in us by the Holy Eucharist, wherein she feeds us with the blessed body and blood of our Redeemer the bread and wine being made to be this to us through consecration by her duly- appointed priests. Of Holy Baptism, so great is the efficacy, that it im- prints an indelible character on the soul ; it conveys also to the body the principle of immortality, and is the cause efficient of man's resurrection. In Baptism man is formed anew by the miraculous water, which is impregnated with the Holy Spirit, and operates to cleanse from the guilt and stain of sin, to make pure, to make holy, in a word, it imparts an ' angelic nature' to the recipient, and of a child of Adam, makes him really and truly the child of God. This life, imparted in Baptism, is sustained and strengthened, and extended by the Holy Eucharist, till it becomes transfused through the whole man, body as well as soul ; and the whole being, thus spiritual- ised, is at length swallowed up in immortality. " Such being the transcendental and mysterious virtue (as we are taught by the Holy Fathers, those true interpreters of Scripture) of the Sacraments of the Church, you will learn to regard them as, so to 10 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. speak, the present, though invisible Deity, as the sheckinah of the divine glory, as, in some sense, ' God manifest in the flesh :' and like as the cherubim over the ark of the mercy seat are represented as veiling their faces with their wings ; so, whenever you approach the holy font, and especially the holy altar, around which angels continually hover, you will ' behave* yourself with the deepest and most awful reverence. Next to her holy Sacraments, you will reverence her ministers, whose divine function it is to consecrate the water in Baptism, and to make the bread and wine to become the body and blood of Christ for the nourishment of your souls. For besides this, their office it is to offer up the solemn sacrifice of your prayers and praises to the Most Holy to intercede for you to remit your sins, when penitent, by absolution, and to grant you at last a safe passage into the kingdom of heaven, and the like. All your prayers, all your faith, all your oblations would be vain, except as presented through Her ; for she is the appointed medium through which the graces of redemption come to man. Her ministers have committed to them the 4 ministry of reconciliation that is, the office of reconciling God to sinners. They are mediators with God ; for though the Scripture says, ' there is but one mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus,' the meaning of that is, that there is but one mediator of redemption, not that there are not many mediators of intercession. Those who believe in the Holy Catholic Church have the benefit THE DEEAM AN ALLEGORY. 11 of the prayers of all the saints yea, and also of the services of the holy angels ; for, says the apostle, ' are they not all ministering spirits sent forth to minister to them who shall be heirs of salvation.' But here we are called upon to believe, rather than presumptuously to inquire. There is a great mystery about the office of the Church, as St. Paul says ; and, when speaking of her, the holy Apostle breaks off with a sort of sacred reserve, which we shall do well to imitate. It suffices for us to know, respecting her, that she is the Lamb's bride, and as his bride is our mother; and that, like a true mother, she feels towards her children the most tender sympathy, watches over their whole course on earth with maternal solicitude, and nurses them up to the full stature of her own internal life. " Since, then, you have such a mother, who has so provided for your spiritual welfare ; and since she is declared by the Apostle, to be *the Church of t]ie living God} so that, in some mysterious way, God is present in her, you will view her with ' all but adoring love/ and will reverence in her the body of the Redeemer himself, and his mystic bride, " As closely connected with the devout veneration that is due to her, you will reverence this temple, which is her material emblem, and evince your piety by the solemn awe with which you will tread her courts. Those cannot be said to know how to ' be- have ' themselves in the house of God, who pay not, in some sort, the same reverence to the house, which they would pay to him who dwells in it. To the truly 12 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. devout mind, every object in this holy place possesses a sort of ' religiosity/ as embodying and typing forth some sacred truth of our holy faith. The very walls of the Church, covered as they are with Catholic symbols, are pregnant with divine instruction. When- ever in particular you look upon that * holy efficacious sign,' (and you will look upon it often, said the preacher, pointing to the Cross, which stood at the back of the altar,) you will feel the deepest, purest, most spiritual emotions of piety excited in your bosoms. By the silent contemplation of that, and not by talking with a profane familiarity about the death of Christ, you will realise what it is to ' know Jesus Christ, and him crucified' It is thus you will see ' Jesus Christ evidently set forth crucified among you? and will become crucified with him by dwelling in devout silence upon his sufferings ; by exercising self-mortification in fasting, humiliation, and the like. There is a sort of sacramental virtue in such emblems (for so the Catholic Church has ever believed) ; and when viewed with pious reverence they doubtless exercise a sub- limating and elevating spiritual influence on the soul. This, and other like things, sanctioned by the Church, are full of spiritual significancy, and in mystical silence they each tell us of some Catholic truth ; they sacramentalise, so to speak, all the sacred verities of our faith. The great west-door, for example, as you enter, reminds you of our one Lord Jesus Christ ; its two folds, signify his two natures the human and the divine ; the triple division of the windows, and the like, THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 13 teach us the doctrine of the Trinity; the octagon form of the font denotes regeneration; the transepts tell us of the atonement; the nave, in which you kneel and pray, represents the Church militant ; the screen, which separates this from the choir, is the barrier of death, through which every one of the faithful has to pass before he can join the Church triumphant. Then again, within the cancel (for the Church would keep these great truths ever before you), the three steps, by which you ascend to the Holy Altar, speak of the sacred Trinity; the two candles on it denote the two lights of the law and the gospel ; or, as some think, the two natures of Christ ; and that most sacred of all emblems, the Cross, full of sacramental sig- nificancy, embodies in one view the whole mystery of our redemption. It is thus that Churches may be regarded as ' depositories of divine grace ; ' for through these signs He who * worketh all, and in all,' can doubtless impart grace to his people. "Practical duties, too, as well as mystical privi- leges, may be learned from Catholic constructed churches: the unity of many members, and, conse- quently, the duty of preserving that unity, is shadowed forth in the multiplex arcade; the obligation to let our light shine before men by the pierced and flowered parapet; while from the upward curl of the sculptured foliage, the upward spring of the flying buttress, the sharp rise of the window arch, the^high thrown pitch of the roof, we learn that, vanquishing earthly desires, we should ascend in heart and mind towards heaven. 14 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. ' Lessons of holy wisdom/ indeed, may be gathered from every figure with which we are here surrounded ; from the monogram carved on boss and corbel ; from the agnus Dei ; from the mystic fish ; from the trifolium ; from the emblematic triangle, and the like, all of which are oracular of divinity. " The profane, and men not of holy humble minds, whose hearts have not been purged from all that is carnal and earthly, may see nothing symbolic or sacramental in these sacred emblems ; but it is by such instru- mentalities as these that God's holy Church (doubtless under the guidance of his Spirit), has sought to train 1 the minds of her worshippers to rise from the seen to the unseen ; from the earthly to the heavenly. "The great defect in the Christianity of the present day is, a want of faith. Men will no longer believe when they cannot understand. Those who profess evangelical religion talk, indeed, much of faith, and of preaching the Cross ; but it is not the faith of the Church which they preach, nor the true doctrine of the Cross which they inculcate. By faith they mean certain feelings, operating in the mind itself, without reference to any visible objects, and resting only in what they term 'expe- riences.' Such faith is a mere human quality. The doctrine of the Cross denotes no more in their creed then putting their trust wholly in Christ's sufferings on the Cross for salvation not the being crucified with him by fasting, penance, and holy self-denial, and the like. " On the mysterious doctrine of the sufferings of THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 16 Christ it has ever been the practice of the Catholic Church to maintain a sacred reserve : these are to be contemplated in silent devoutness, and what we feel respecting them expressed only in sighs and tears, not blazoned forth in the unreverent strains of human eloquence. This is one part of that behaving ourselves as we ought in the house of God, upon which the Apostle insists in the text. " There is one point more on which it is my duty to instruct you as members of Christ's holy Catholic Church. Avoid controversy. Religion is too sacred a thing for controversy. Its essential doctrines are made so certain by the Church that, as the holy Apostle states in the verse following the text, It is ' without ' that is, it ought to be 'without controversy' ' Great is the mystery of godliness.' It is a mystery, and, as such, is to be viewed with awful reverence, and silent adoring wonder not curiously inquired into and discussed. We hear sometimes vi religious contro- versy; but it might more properly be termed irreligious, for it arises entirely from irreverence of the mind. "But besides being an indication of a want of piety and of true humility, and, therefore, wrong in spirit, controversy never tends to any good result. As respects the Church, it destroys unity that most essential bond of Claris tians. As respects yourselves, it only unsettles the mind, and involves it in doubt and uncertainty ; as we see in the case of those who disputed about Christ's claims, as related in the 7th chapter of St. John, where it is most significantly 16 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. recorded at the end "And every man went to his own home." They came to no common agreement, because they made Christ's doctrine a matter of dis- pute, and not a matter of obedience. It is not the appointment of our Lord and Master that the people should ever listen to the voice of controversy, or set up themselves as judges of what is truth. If doubts arise in their own minds, they should bring them unto the Priest, that he may resolve them, and they should receive the law at his mouth in unquestioning submission. It is only by so acting that the unity of the Church, which is as essential as its verity, can be preserved. " Finally, then, I exhort and command you to keep close to your holy, faithful, tender-hearted mother, the Church. What child, indeed, would not put im- plicit faith in its own mother ? She teaches you how, in all respects, to behave yourselves as members of Christ's body. Be content to tread the holy round of fast and festival, of duty and service, which she prescribes for you, and you shall know peace. All without her holy circle is dissension and distraction, doubt and perplexity; all within is certainty and order, harmony, and love. Her bosom is the abode of all kind affections the soft resting-place for all the weary and heavy-laden the source of all spiritual composure and satisfaction. Say, then, with the holy Psalmist ' This shall be my rest for ever ; here will I dwell, for I have a delight therein.' ' The preacher ended, but not our dreamer's dream. THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 17 There was such calm confidence in his statements, and his last words fell so soothingly upon the ear of the hearer, that he sunk into a still deeper slumber than before, and the whole remainder of the night was passed in a state of unconscious forgetfulness, except that a strange sense of oppression came over him, and he every now and then started, and struggled, like a person labouring under the nightmare, as if he felt held down by some invisible power, from which he in vain endeavoured to get free. When the imaginary effort was over, he would again fall into a deep, undisturbed repose for a while. Next, an airy ghost -like shape would haunt him, and seem to tread close upon his heels ; but when he turned (as in fancy he often turned) to strike it, it yielded impassive to his blows, and was still there. Anon, he would make a grasp at a large bright sword which lay before him, but of which he could get no hold. Thus troubled, though deep, were his slumbers, while the long, long night went on. In the meantime, dark clouds had gathered round the distant horizon, and hung louring over the here- tofore bright sunshiny valley. The lurid lightnings fl arec l the sky opening and shutting rapidly in rifted ghastliness, revealing denser and denser clouds of angry hue behind, as if the wrath of Heaven were indeed shrouded under their wings. By some unseen influence the country, which, before he had entered the mystic temple looked so rich and beautiful, changed into blackness and barrenness. A withering c 18 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. blight has suddenly passed over every object. The trees have dropped their yet unripe fruit ; the herbs and the grass droop in visible faintness ; the rivers and streams, so lately of silvery brightness, look like so much liquid pitch; the animals moan and cast their eyes upwards as if labouring under some sensible distress; the birds cease their song; the inhabitants, who but yesterday looked the very pictures of cheerful contentment and of hope erect, have assumed a haggard, sad, downcast aspect their dwellings even, squalid and neglected now, seem to partake by sympathy in their own moral wretchedness, poverty, in fact, has here succeeded to plenty, mis- trust to confidence, treachery and violence to truth- fulness and love. Never had so great a change, in so short a time, and by such unaccountable means, been effected. But all unconscious was our dreamer of the withering process that was passing over the scene of loveliness, of plenty, and of peace, upon which his eyes had just before rested. He is held in the chains of insensibility by the power of the serpent, which lies coiled up under his pillow. The soporific influ- ence of this creature was so potent upon the organs of sense (though nature struggled from time to time to recover herself to waking consciousness), that no human energy could break its force, arouse the sleeper to active intelligence, or make him sensible of the presence of the fatal enemy with which, when he awakes, he will have to contend. THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 19 ! The serpent which produced these stupefying effects was of no ordinary kind. Besides the peculiar narcotic power which it possessed, and through which it caused all who came within its influence to fall into deep sleep, it had also fearful organs of destructive- ness when once provoked ; for, strange to tell, this wonderful creature had seven heads, each grooved into a grisly jointed neck of several inches in length, and each head contained a sting of fatal virulence. Its stings were not so many fangs lying, lancet-like (as the ordinary adder's sting), in the side of the mouth, but the point of each tongue sent out a sting of an arrow-headed shape, full of deadly poison. Another peculiarity of this monster was, that its seven heads were made capable of closing down into one, and, when closed down into one, the whole virus of its seven forked tongues was transferred, and be- came concentrated in one single sting in the tail, of tremendous power ; while its face assumed the appear- ance of a female's of the most fascinating beauty. Its eyes, which were before of a dull dusky green, turned to the brightest sky-blue, and beamed with a mild intelligence and a witching softness which it was next to impossible to withstand. So much, in- deed, in this new shape, did this dreadful serpent look like a lovely woman, that all power of resistance to it (unless, perchance, you carried about you a certain antidote against such charms) became for the time suspended, as if the beholder was under the spell of some mighty enchantress. 20 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. It was under the influence of this creature our dreamer continued to sleep, still being, as he imagined, in the church where his attention had been so much riveted, gazing fixedly on the face of an image; and on he would have slept, had not a heaven-sent messenger touched him on his side, and said, " Awake, arise, behold the light of day ! " and, leading him to the window, shewn him (still in vision) the change which had come over " the spirit of his dream," in regard to the happy valley. At the sight, a shudder of horror- stricken surprise shook his whole frame, and the thunder of heaven breaking at the moment in an awful clap over his head, caused him to start from his couch into the open room with such a jerk of the right arm upon the pillow, that it aroused the dor- mant serpent. In an instant, uncoiling itself at full length, and uttering a most horrible hiss, it darts after him upon the floor. It erects itself upon its tail ; it swells itself out to a prodigious size ; its eyes kindle into a fiery glare, and with all its seven heads extended, it stands ready to strike. Our now-awakened dreamer, seeing the fearful enemy which he has to encounter, summons up all the energy of nature, and seizes a double-edged sword which happens to lie on the table ; the serpent perceives his intention, makes a spring at him, but is baffled by the swift brandish of the sword, which he flashes before him with all his might. His attempt, however, to strike the huge reptile is utterly ineffective. The wily creature evades his blow by a surprisingly quick twist THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. 21 of its pliant folds, and sends out such dazzling colours of beauty upon its skin, as attract and fix his admiring gaze. He pauses in thought whether to strike again. The subtle animal observes his suspense, and instantly assumes its most prepossessing aspect the face of a fascinating female. He is now well nigh spell bound, and incapable of further battling. But from certain observed motions at the point where the seven heads unite in one, he is convinced that the slightest change in his resolve will be followed by its resuming its old form and making another deadly spring. Feeling that there can be no safety to his life while such a creature is suffered to remain in existence, that to attempt to fly would be only to fall, he raises his heart to God in prayer, and nerved now with more than mortal strength, he wields the sword to and fro with such infinite quickness against this deceitful charmer, that its eyes are dazzled, and it is driven to slink back. In a moment, coiling down into its original form, it erects itself, fold upon fold, with heads projected in attitude to dart at him. He rushes upon it, sword in hand. Blow after blow he deals out to it ; gash after gash is made upon its body ; the dreadful monster writhes, and hisses, and raises itself again and again upon its tail, to make a spring at its foe ; but one tremendous cut from the double-edged sword gave it a mortal wound, and took away its power of all fur- ther attack. It required, however, seven desperately heavy blows before its seven heads could be severed entirely from its body, and all its ability to hurt 22 THE DREAM AN ALLEGORY. destroyed. But at length this fearful reptile, which had so long held him bound in a death-like slumber, lies dead at his feet. Behold, the great seven-headed serpent is slain ! When our Christian Conqueror (for so we may now call him) had sufficiently recovered from his exhaust- ing exertions, he carefully examined the curious con- struction of this novel creature, and finding that its skin is most beautifully bedight with spots of purple and of scarlet, upon scales of deep bright green, and that its seven heads could be again joined by their grisly ligaments, so as to appear united at one point, just as when alive, he has it suspended, in this its natural form, over his mantelpiece, beneath the tried and trusty sword with which the creature had been slain, and under it he placed this simple but significant inscription, " The Trophies of Truth's Triumphs." DEO GLORIA. THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR. 23 THE SUBTLETY OF EKROR. " THE many-headed Hydra of Error, " is an expres- sion common in the mouths of men. Their frequent use of this expression evidences that error, to their imaginations at least, is a fearful, hideous monster, that needs only to be seen in order to be shunned; but then they are wont to forget that, in any developed and definitely outlined shape, it seldom is to be seen in its many-headed form, never. And as where the terrors of the imagination take the place of the calm collected conclusions of the reason, or of deliberate observation, men are hurried out of their propriety, it too often happens that they rush in their haste into the very jaws of the danger from which they think to fly. It is a circumstance by no means to be overlooked, that error usually makes its way by subtlety, and not by force. The Scriptures speak of the " deceivableness " of error. It is its deceivableness chiefly which consti- tutes its dangerousness. That it is regarded with great dread is salutary is well ; but wherein lies its peculiar power to deceive, and thereby to hurt and destroy, is little considered, and seldom distinctly de- tected. It is, indeed, a sad and undeniable fact, that 24 THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR. men may be the unconscious victims of its fascinations even while denouncing its deadly delusiveness. Man is a creature who is governed in a great degree by invisible influences influences acting directly, but unseen upon the mind. This none will deny. But while all will be found ready to admit that human kind are, from this circumstance, liable to be wrought upon so as to be insensibly deceived, each of us is apt to persuade himself that he is proof against all the power of delusion. The varied forms which, it is known, error can assume, and the multiplied instances in which it succeeds in deceiving the most acute and intelligent, might teach us at once a lesson of less confidence and of more caution. We propose, in this first essay, to investigate the various conditions under which error is enabled to advance its impositions upon mankind; and in so doing, we shall endeavour to trace out the more occult and insidious causes of its deceptive influence, without dwelling at any length upon those which are open and patent to all. There are some so obvious, that the wonde^ is they do not strike every one's notice ; but even these often pass unobserved from sheer inattention. By bringing these, as >yell as its more latent and subtle operations into view, we hope to furnish the reader with some useful tests and criterions, whereby he may dis- criminate between the safe and the unsafe in religious tendency, and discover whether he is on the path that leads to truth, or in that deceptions one which ends in error. THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR. 25 The following may be laid down as axioms in this too much neglected science of spiritual philo- sophy : I. All error takes truth as its starting point. This is a fact by no means to be overlooked. Error is not, as is commonly supposed, the direct opposite to truth, but a departure from the truth ; and the two not only start from the same point, but, for a considerable dis- tance, they usually run nearly coincident, or parallel ; so that the deviation of the one from the other, and whether that deviation be increasing or diminishing, can be ascertained only by taking the angle, so to speak, here and there, and onwards, most accurately with the com- passes of the Divine word and testimony. The com- mon characteristic of error, indeed, is its sinuosity, by which it is made to touch, and cut, and cross con- tinually the narrow silvery line of truth, which, like the sun's path in the heavens, is fixed, though untrace- able, except by the virtues which are its. signs. Even where it goes off at a tangent, never to touch the right line again, the deflection, in most cases, is so slight at first, that it is not perceived (how slight, for instance, it was at the outset with the Galatian Christians in regard to the doctrine of justification) ; and it is only by looking in the opposite direction, after a large intervening space from the starting point, that its wide and ever widening departure from the truth can be detected ; in other words, it is only by having respect to the issues and consequents of a doctrine or principle, when fully followed out, we 26 THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR. can discover whether it will place a mail finally on the wrong side of that great gulf which none can cross. , It is, then, this two -fold characteristic of error, its slight deviation at first from truth, and its fre- quent touching and crossing of the line of truth, which causes it so often to deceive, in some cases, fatally to mislead men. Either they do not mark the deviation, and then they go wide unwittingly ; or it appears to them too slight to be of any consequence, and so they err thoughtlessly ; or, on the other hand, perceiving- it to be coincident with truth at various points, while it seems to cross it at others, they get bewildered, like a person wandering in a dimly-lighted labyrinth, and, finding their eyes to be of no use to them, they close them and walk on feeling their way hopefully, trusting, though they know not whither they are going, that they shall at last issue out into the open light of heaven, while, in too many cases, the result is they wander endlessly on, and are eternally lost. II. The next thing to be noted is, that error is at all times the shadow of truth. It bears its image, and has all its features and outlines, being distinguishable from it only by its greater dimness, or, what is even more deceiving, a greater degree of brightness. Every truth has, in fact, its counterfeit its fictitious, flit ting, and unsubstantial resemblance. This resem- blance men sometimes take for the reality, or more frequently substitute for, till it comes to supersede, the reality. Images or emblems, bearing a certain rela- THE SUBTLETY OP ERROR. 27 tion of likeness to them, must be used to picture to the mental eye spiritual verities which are but imperfectly revealed, or of which the mind can of itself form no definite conception. The whole of the Mosaic economy was grounded upon the principle of shadowing forth great truths by inferior signs ; but this, though in- tended for a help to the apprehension of typified truth, became incidentally a cause of error, in that the car- nally-minded among the Jews took those signs for substances, instead of as shadows only of good things to come. It was not that those signs themselves were errors, considered simply as signs (for they truly bodied forth, as far as any signs could, the things which they signified) ; but the error lay in regarding them as ulti- mate objects, instead of looking through them to those great spiritual realities which, not being yet above our human horizon, could become visible only by their being made to " cast their shadows before." The dan- ger of error to Christians lies in the opposite direction. Their temptation is to turn the realities themselves into shadows, that they may have, what the gross unre- newed mind in its limping feebleness always looks after, some visible objects to rest in. * The professed design, indeed, of material symbols, where they are resorted to, is to aid in the conception of the spiritual verities of which they are assumed to stand as appro- priate signs ; but, under the Gospel dispensation, it is manifestly false to assume that they are aids at all to * See chapter ! is so pure and waveless, that it exercises none of that witching influence which draws us on only to deceive, and leaves us, at last, way-lost. The reason why the books and sermons to which we have alluded prove so attractive to many minds is, that there is nothing definite in them ; their state- ments are all vague ; they beat " about and about it," but they never bring clearly arid distinctly out before you any one point of soul -striking truth. Truth in them, indeed, is only broken up into bits, and turned and shuffled into a variety of beautiful and continually changing forms, like the pieces of stained glass in a kaleidoscope ; and thus it is that it cheats the eye of the reader into the belief that he has been con- versing with divine verities, just because he has viewed things upon which there has been cast the hue of a celestial colouring. This style of writing pleases especially persons of an imaginative disposi- tion, or of a superficial piety, inasmuch as it places them in the regions of a highly rarefied atmosphere, bordering on vacuity, and their transit through it be- comes like a flight through the air in a dream, in which they see strange supernatural sights, and hear strange supernatural sounds. Moreover, the senti- ment that breathes through these works is mystical rather than real, and the current of thought looks deep only because, being turbid, it is obscure. There is a pensive solemnity in their tone that is not easily distinguishable from real piety, and, enchanted by this into a sort of dreamy forgetfulness of all realities, THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR. the reader is unconsciously led on into the shades of a darkness that is fast closing him in on all sides ; nor will he discover that the light is waning from before his eyes, unless he lifts them heavenward, and observes that all things above and around him look undefined in their outlines, confused and dim. In a word : Error, like the light of the risen sun on the wak- ing eye, breaks not, at once full upon you, but creeps, like the twilight of the closing day, slowly over you. It is, therefore, one test for determining whether we are verging towards the dim obscure of error, in any case, to observe whether there be a growing in- distinctness in our views of doctrine ; whether sha- dowy doubts and flitting forms of unreal shapes seem to be gathering around us ; whether we begin to feel uncertain whether what we have hitherto regarded as undoubted truth be, after all, truth; and whether certain principles which we have been wont to view as false be, after all, false ; and thus, getting bewil- dered in a maze of mental intricacies, we are tempted to give ourselves blindly up to the guidance of some assumed infallible authority, or to plunge reckless into the dark void of infidelity. The Church of Rome glories in (and this her ambiguous modern friends regard as a commendable feature in her system) her solemn mystery, and im- posing ceremonial, and multiplied objects of devout interest, as serving to keep up a ceaseless round of what is imagined to be holy service. We grant her all of this kind that she claims. It is when the sun is with- THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR. 53 drawn that the planets and all the minor constellations appear : it is the distinctive feature of the day that then the sun alone is seen to shine. The Romish Church may present to the eye the enchanting scenery of a firmament lighted up with the soft lustre of the moon, and studded with many stars, in her enthroned Virgin, and confessors, and milky-way of multiplied minute saints ; but these are so visible only because Christ, the Sun of righteousness, has been placed, by that Church's own turning away from Him, under the horizon. Truly may we say of the Church of Rome that her light (for we deny not that she has some light) resembles that of the stars, in that she " rules by night." It has been the favourite resource of some who have involved themselves in the mystery and the mazes of tbeologic perplexities to go, for a time, into what is termed a state of " retreat." This we believe to be the most dangerous course which individuals, in this condition, could possibly adopt. Retirement occasion- ally for a time, to give ourselves with the less dis- traction to meditation and prayer, especially when we are about to enter upon any arduous acts of duty, may be advisable ; but it is not the best method for clearing our perceptions of the relations of religious truths. To flee from the world, also, in order to battle successfully with temptation, is undoubtedly the safest course ; but in all cases of speculative mental difficulties our counsel would be, "Go into the world ; mix with men ; listen to persons of unper- 54 THE SUBTLETY OF ERROR. verted common sense; occupy yourself in active duties." There is nothing like the stern realities of life for curing the morbidnesses of the mind. If at any time you are placed in doubt whether a book you have read, or a sermon you have heard, breathes the spirit of true evangelic piety, read immediately after it one of the epistles of St. Paul : mark the healthy robustness and the manly simplicity of his sentiments. If unavoidably you should get involved in the intri- cacies of bewildered thought upon any theologic question, be not hasty to form a conclusion, lest you tempt God, but wait patiently for his Spirit to give you light, and you shall never be greatly misled. Truth, rest assured, carries with it a growing distinct- ness ; and though for a time, like the blind man whose eyes Christ opened, men may appear to you but as trees walking, yet if you keep your gaze intently on it, and suffer not yourself to be diverted by earth-born shadows, all things will at length stand out distinct and clearly defined ; and you shall be in no danger any longer of mistaking the ideal for the real. THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 55 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. OF all the vague, mystical, indeterminate ideas enveloped in any one term of theology, there is none more so to most minds than that attempted to be em- bodied in the term, the Church. As this term is used by a large class of writers, it is impossible to attach to the thing denoted by it any form, outline, or substan- tive existence, so as have any definite conception of what the thing is, and where it is to be found. Even " imagination," which the poet says, " bodies forth the form of things unknown, and gives to airy nothing a local habitation and a name," is here baffled ; for local habitation, or a place among the recognisable realities of the actual world, the Church, according to their description of it, has none. As a proof of what we have asserted, let us take the following account of the nature and office of the Church. After stating that the Church has a " real individual nature," the writer whom we quote proceeds : " We mean by a Being, that which has a separate nature and peculiar identity, a life, con- sciousness, and energy of its own; something which is not merely the creation of our imagination formed by abstraction out of various elements, as ready to 56 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. resolve themselves into any other shape, but which exists irrespective of our conceptions, and by its works and doings asserts its place in the actual world. Since the Church, therefore, is declared in Scripture to have an individual being, and personal existence, to be Christ's body, his mystic bride ; since it is de- clared to be created for the setting forth of God's glory so that its very life must be in prayer and praise, therefore those who compose it are not a mere con- geries of unconnected essences, brought by accidental juxtaposition within a common precinct, but by a divine order and mystical harmony, are in truth built up into a living body, and connatural whole." Now to those who take obscurity for deptli,and the unknowable for the magnificent, this may look like very fine writing ; for, without question, this passage possesses all that misty vagueness of grandeur which is said to be a characteristic of the sublime ; but some- how, spite of ourselves, it forces upon our minds the re- collection that the sublime borders close upon the ridi- culous. That this is not the language of mere sarcasm on our part, but in very deed the sober severity of truth, will be manifest if we only analyse this conglo- merate of absurdities, and weigh the import of the several grandiloquent expressions which are here used to describe the Church. But, to complete the pic- ture, and to give all the parts in their several harmo- nious relations to each other with all fairness, we must bring into view those other statements of the writer which stand in immediate juxtaposition with this THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 57 transparent, egregious attempt to imitate, or rather to transcend the depth and the majestic dignity, of old Hooker. "As the public voice of this collective being," the author continues, " does the minister by God's ordinance stand forth, and presents the commingling adoration of many hearts blended together into the awful solemnity of one Christian sacrifice." And, immediately preceding the before- quoted passage, we find this statement: "The conduct appropriate to public worship must be regulated by its nature. Its principle is that each member of the Church should have somewhat to offer, yet that the collective prayers of all should be presented as one single tribute by the minister of God. For this is what preserves to the Church the real attribute of an individual nature, while it maintains the sacred doctrine of the inward life of each man's spirit." Now it will be observed that, in the first of the three passages we have here quoted, the Church is spoken of iu its collective or catholic capacity ; and yet in the second, which follows in immediate con- nection with it, the presenting of the " collective prayers" of this " collective being" is represented as the act of one single " minister of God." This is the first inconsistency. The second is this : the writer states that " this is what preserves to the Church the real attribute of an individual nature" (he does not make, let it be noticed, the " one Spirit," which per- vades all the members of the body, to be, as the 58 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. Scripture represents it, that which gives it its cor- porate oneness); while this attribute is scattered to the winds by the fact that the prayers of this " collective being" are offered by many ministers, in many forms, and not by any single one unless, indeed, by the " public voice of this collective being" our author means a certain central authority of the West, ac- cording to the theory of Romanists, by which it is held that the people confess to the priests, the priests to the bishops, and the bishops to the Pope, and the Pope for the whole to God ; and that thus it is that "the real attribute of an individual nature" is preserved to the Church. But again : while, in the first of the foregoing- quotations, the Church is far enough, in terms at least, from being made an abstraction, yet an ab- straction it is, of the most impalpable kind; for where, in the whole universe, is any such actual " Being' as that there described, to be found in realised existence ? existing, that is, as a red per- son? The Scriptures, indeed, by a figu^ of speech, speak sometimes of the Church as a person ; but it is evidently not as in a figure, but as in truth a per- son, this author invites us to contemplate the Church ; for, according to him, it possesses a real " individual nature :" it is emphatically a " Being" that which has a " separate nature and peculiar identity" and not a body " formed out of various elements," capable of " resolving themselves into any other shape." In other words, it is not a mere congregation or society of THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 59 veritable men and women, united by one common pur- pose, and one common spirit, and so forming one body to " our intellectual conceit," as Hooker expresses it ; for it has " a life, consciousness, and energy of its own," distinct, as is expressly stated, from the in- ward life of each individual Christian, or of the indi- vidual members which make up the whole. And yet, while it is of such a thoroughly mystical and trans- cendental nature, that it exists " irrespective of our conceptions," " by its works and doings/' we are told, " it asserts its place in the actual world." Here we are more bewildered than ever. Where, in the name of common sense, we ask, does this wonderful Being dwell which has a "personal existence," and yet " exists irrespective of our conceptions; " which has " a peculiar identity and life of its own," and " by its works and doing sasserts its place in the actual world ; " which is, in a word, not a society or body politic, but a " Being" When we read this description, we seem to see rising up before us a huge form of substantive existence, a new and unknown living creature of vast dimensions, endued with extraordinary powers and properties; but, lo, when we put out our hand, and attempt to touch it, it turns out to be a huge impalpability. "Works and doings," we thought, were visible things ; and by means of these at least we hoped to realise it to our apprehensions; but it is made to flit through our fingers like thin air, by our being informed that it has a " separate nature" from anything that we see, feel, know, or can take cog- nisance of, even in our mental conceptions. 60 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. Had it been the "mystical body of Christ" of which the writer was here intelligently speaking, we could have realised this to our minds, by its being, what our Church describes it, intelligibly enough, " the blessed company of all faithful people." But it is evidently not anything so gross in the conception as a company of faithful people our author had in his fancy, but a something quite transcendental, existing independently of human elements, by the possession of a life in itself, a sort of second deity. It is true, he begins by speaking of the visible Church (if indeed he knew what he was speaking about at all) ; for he speaks of it by its outward and visible acts of worship ; but he ends by making this visible body altogether invisible, and the invisible to have a totally distinct life and nature from that which palpitates in the heart of the visible. Now did ever reader see " confusion worse confounded ?" Had it been of the visible Church alone, or had it been of the invisible alone, he had spoken consistently throughout, we might have understood him ; but they are so jumbled together in the descrip- tion, and such a misty vagueness is thrown over the whole, that we can catch no definite idea of either, but stand bemazed before some vast shadowy new kind of being, different from both. Even while he allows it to glimmer out here and there, through the thick medium, that this Church is composed of men, real human beings of a certain character, yet when he comes to speak of them collectively, as forming one body, they are no longer so many persons brought together with one accord, within a common precinct, for one common pur- THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 61 pose; but, by some strange new mode of transubstantia- tion, they are transformed " in truth" (noi in figure, be it observed) into a "living body and connatural whole." Scripture is referred to as furnishing this ideal of of the Church, because such terms are applied to it as " the body" of Christ and his "bride ;" but com- mon sense would tell any man, that these terms are used there figuratively, and in the way of analogy, not literally, or to describe any actual transcendental reality. Yet because various figures derived from persons and their relations, are adopted in Scripture to image forth the collective Church as a whole, this learned divine at once draws the notable conclusion, that the Church has a real " individual nature and personal existence"* There is obviously the same error in interpretation latent here, in regard to the body of the Church, as that out of which has arisen the Romish doctrine of transubstantiation, an ab- surd doctrine evolved out of a figure. With as much sense might we argue, that the Church is " in truth " a " temple" composed of real stones, because it is in some places spoken of collectively as a "temple" (though that it should be at once a " temple," and yet a " body," with a "personal existence " and " life of its * This falls only one step short of the absurdity of the Sweden- borgians, who hold (grounding their opinion on the description in the Apocalypse of the " bride, the Lamb's wife," coming down out of heaven to be publicly betrothed) that there is to be a female Mes- siah, who is hereafter to be actually married to Christ; arguing analogically, that as Adam was not perfect without Eve, so Christ or the Church will not be perfect till this is accomplished. 62 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. own," would be rather hard to reconcile) ; or that it is " in truth" and literally, a ivoman, because it is de- clared to be the Lamb's wife ! If the Church be indeed a " Being" it is certainly not such a Being, taking our author's description of it, as " our minds by intellectual conceit are able to apprehend" (HOOKER) ; for who can apprehend it as a Being having a "separate individual nature," and a "life, conscious- ness, and energy of its own," distinct from that which pervades the individual members of which it is com- posed, and which it derives from its Divine Head ? The simple truth, however, perhaps is, that nothing more was intended by all this amphibologous phraseo- logy, and high-sounding grandiloquence, than to de- scribe the collective universal Church as spiritually form- ing one corporate body ; but even supposing this, surely the gentlest thing that can be said of such a style of writing is, that it " darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge." At all events, it sets aside the rule which Hooker lays down, that " when we read of any duty " (and " prayer and praise " are duties) " which the Church of God is bound unto, the Church whom this doth concern is a sensible known company" Whether we would have definite ideas of the visible Church, or of the mystical body of Christ, how much more simple and intelligible are the definitions given in our own au- thorised formularies ; to wit, that the first, the "visible Church," " is a congregation of faithful men, in which the pure word of God is preached, and the sacraments be duly administered according to Christ's ordinance THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 63 in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same : " and of the second, or mystical body of Christ, that it is " the blessed company of all faithful people." However we may excuse the use, we cannot deny the practical mischief, of such descriptions of the Church as those we have been considering; for in perfect accordance with the absurd jargon which speaks of the Church as an actual living being, having a " personal existence" a " life, consciousness, and energy of its own," our inner sense is continually in- sulted by other writers of the same school with such sickly sentimentalities as " the tender sympathies of the Church," the "motherly solicitudes of the Church," " the gentle smiles of the Church," and " the life- giving influences of the Church ; " by means of which expressions men are led to look to the Church rather than to Christ to be their Saviour. What less than dethroning Christ from his office , or than blas- phemous presumption is it, to speak of any individual human minister as " the public voice of this collective being ;" or as " presenting the commingling adoration of many hearts blended together into the awful solem- nity of one Christian sacrifice ? " This mode of speaking may exalt the clergy, as indeed it does exalt them, far above the platform of the New Testament : it obviously constitutes them a priesthood, in the proper sense of the word ; and by ascribing to them the office which belongs to Christ alone, robs him of his peculiar dignity ; for he alone can offer, or officiate as Priest, for the universal 64 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. Church. Its tendency, then, is essentially anti-Chris- tian. As it has been too truly remarked by our pre- sent primate, this system " makes the Church first an abstraction, then a person, and lastly a Saviour." Such is the inevitable result of all such exagge- rated and distorted notions of the Church of its real individuality its inherent life its self-possessed grace its mediatory office Its separate nature and powers, distinct from those to be found generally in its associated members spoken of in Scripture as a body corporate, because analogous to an earthly kingdom, under one Head, and governed by one common prin- ciple or law differing from it only in that where the one carries on its executive by physical means, the other uses only such means as are spiritual or moral. While thus analagous to an earthly kingdom, there is, however, this important difference between that and the Church, namely that its Head is divine, and has im- mediate access to the hearts of His subjects, and that He can directly influence them in their inner nature. Hence the metaphorical language of Scripture in re- gard to the Church, though figurative, is not a mere figure, but represents a thing that really exists, though not the real mode of its existence. If we examine more fully into that ideal of the Church which possesses many minds, we shall find it described as invested with such powers as the follow- ing : that the authority imparted to the apostles by Christ, for the founding of the Church, has been transmitted full and entire, for its continuance, to their THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 65 successors, who are assumed to be the bishops and priests ordained by them of the present day that they are " the ministers and distributors of His grace, of His Spirit, and of His sacrifice at the font and at the altar, binding and loosing, opening and shutting with the keys of the kingdom of heaven " that " the traditions of grace and the traditions of truth are both perpetual in this Church by virtue of Christ's pre- sence" that " infallibility is secured to the Church by spiritual illumination in the subject which perceives the truth, that is, the Church itself" that the Church is to be implicitly submitted to in its commands, as being the living voice of God that faith in the Church is essential to salvation that "to its ministers is entrusted the power of communicating to man the Divine nature itself, of bringing down the Deity from heaven, and infusing His spirit into the souls of mise- rable mortals" that the possession of this it is that constitutes the Church a "real living body," having life in itself that thus the " sacraments are the means of binding us to the mystical body of Christ," and that it is " their real life which separates them from all other means of grace ;" " for the Church being really Christ's body, the fulness of Him who filleth all in all, its spi- ritual or invisible action is inseparable from the right use of its visible ordinances " that "its ministers are real priests, in the Levitical sense of the term," " as truly Priests as those of the first temple," in that they offer up " a true and real sacrifice in the Holy Eucharist" that to them confession of sins is to be F 66 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. made, because " they have the same full and divine power " of forgiving sins as Christ himself exercised that " the Church is the instrument by which the pardon of God is conveyed to the world ; " and that " Christ has appointed the Church as the only way to eternal life." Such is a general enumeration of the principles which enter as essential elements into what some desig- nate, emphatically, the Church. Now if there be (and if this can be ascertained beyond reasonable doubt) on the earth any body divinely invested with such awful powers as these, for God's sake, we say, let it be submitted to without all question. If there be but that is the very question. And this is a question which we must not, and dare not decide but upon very strong and decisive evidence a question involving such tremendous consequences that it should not be set aside without the most serious inquiry, nor settled without the most jealous care ; for, as it has been justly admitted, " if these powers are not conferred by God, they are blasphemously assumed by man." Into this question, then, let us endeavour, with all seriousness, to enter. Now it is to the Holy Scriptures we must of course resort, in the first instance, for proof that these assumptions on the part of any body or set of men, calling themselves, by virtue of these powers, the Church, are well grounded. Even they themselves will admit that Tradition, except as it " can be proved from Scripture by direct statements," or finds support THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 67 there for so complete a system in, at least, unambigu- ous hints, traced outlines, and manifest allusions, is not sufficient to settle so broad a question. If, therefore, the evidence from Scripture wholly fails, much more if it looks the other way, it will be unnecessary to enter into the inquiry " What is the testimony of Tradition? " And further, since, by their own assertions, belief in the Church is essential to salvation, because in the Church is lodged the keeping and dispensing of the elements of life, we are bound to see to it as indi- viduals that this saving and life-giving power of the Church is very plainly revealed in the divine word : we are not indeed to expect it to be so plainly re- vealed as to force consent (for that is not God's common method of dealing with moral intelligences), but yet so plainly that no honest mind can possibly fail to discover it, if it is to be found there. Our investigations, then, are to be directed to this point, to ascertain what are the Scripture re- vealments as regards the nature, authority, office, and powers of the Church. But first we must determine what is the Scripture meaning of the word Church ; for if we proceed to argue without first determining this, we shall be setting sail from the midst of the ocean, without knowing either the latitude or the longitude, instead of from some fixed point of reckoning. Now the word Church, as adopted by Christ and his Apostles, occurs one hundred and twelve times in the New Testa- ment, and invariably is it used by them in one and 68 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. the same sense, namely, to denote a congregation or society of real or professed believers in Christ. Generally it is used to signify the entire multitude of professed believers living on the earth at one par- ticular time more often, those living in a certain region, city, or house occasionally it denotes the great multitude of the saved, including the faithful in all countries and in all ages, from the beginning to the end of time. Never once is it applied exclusively or distinctively to the clergy. Here, then, one main prop of what is termed "the Church system" is gone at once. The only two instances in which the sense in which the word is used is at all doubtful, are those which occur in Matt. xvi. 18, andxviii. 17. But even here the direction, "Tell it to the Church" means obviously enough, tell it to the particular congregation of which the person is a member ; and the statement, " upon this rock I will build my Church," must mean, upon this rock, so far as the term "my Church" is concerned, I will build the faith of my true people, the great multitude who shall be led to acknowledge, as thou hast, that " I am the Christ, the Son of the living God." The Greek word K\jj tne gi^ 8 distributed to the members for the discharge of their several functions. (1 Cor. xii.; Eom. xii.; 1 Peter iv.) THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 81 (See 1 Cor. xii.) There is no need, then, as there was under the law, for the office of the priesthood to be vested in a particular family or succession to secure its being perpetuated. That, as an external Institute, could be kept up by external means : this, as a spiritual, can be kept as a living body only by spiritual that is, by the ever-acting elastic energy of the Divine Spirit. As it has been well said, " Judaism was a form developing a principle : Chris- tianity is a principle (itself the rule of administration) organising a form." We must not look, then, to find in it the same specific provisions as in the Jewish economy, but only for some well-defined principle, sufficient to guide us in all circumstances. A body that has life in it can always shape its own actions. Given the members and a general rule, and it will organise itself. It is the indwelling of the Spirit vitalising it, and pervading every member, that con- stitutes the Church, under Christ as its Head, one body. It is this also that alone qualifies each mem- ber for the discharge of his function. Our own Church clearly recognises the necessity of this as the grand requisite to constitute a man a true minister of the Gospel, by directing to be put to him, at the time of his ordination, the question, " Dost thou trust that thou art inwardly moved by the Holy Ghost to take upon thee this office and ministration?" The In Ephesians iv., SopaTa is the word used, but this is applied to the persons endowed, and not to the endowments themselves ; the one being- the direct gifts of Christ, the other the distributions of the one all-dividing- Spirit. G 82 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. very being of the Church, in fact, depends now upon the presence and ceaseless operations of the Spirit. If it were not the Spirit that called and qualified, but if it sufficed that a man was episcopally ordained for him to be in the Apostolic succession, (for an Apostolic succession of a certain kind we admit there is,) such a question as this here directed to be put would be wholly irrelevant, not to say needless. Confirmatory of this view of the question, we may remark that authority to teach and preach was never made, in the Apostolic times, to depend upon an official commission merely, but upon ascertained personal qualification. In proof of this it will be remembered that, when a man like Apollos was found " teaching the way of the Lord/' no question was ever raised as to whether he had received, or whence, any special authority. It was by the truth or the falsehood of his doctrine that he was tested. (Mission, or the right to officiate in a par- ticular Church, is altogether a different question, and rests with that particular Church to determine.) Timothy was to charge some at Ephesus that " they teach no other doctrine" not to inquire whether they had got the Apostolic license duly signed and sealed in their pocket. Was he to withdraw from some ? It was because they taught not the doctrine which was " according to godliness." There were some at Crete whose mouths needed to be stopped, not as being uncommissioned, but as "teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre sake;" and they THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 83 were to be stopped, not, it appears, by authority, but by conviction. (Titus i. 9.) Are any condemned as false teachers ? It is " because they bring in damnable heresies." (2 Peter ii. 1.) Do we inquire on what grounds we are to receive, or to reject one who comes to us as a teacher ? The rule St. John gives us to judge by is, whether or not he *' bring the doctrine of Christ" (2 John) : not a word about any Apostolic commission. External authority by commission some might have, but even that was no guarantee, we find, for the truth of their doctrine (Acts xx. 28, 30). It is from within the Church, indeed, that all error touching Christian truth is to be expected to arise. It is by the doctrine they teach, then, we must neces- sarily test men, and not merely by the commission they have received. Even the Apostle Paul, though he could claim to hold his office by direct divine ap- pointment, appeals to his works rather than to his commission, when his Apostolic authority is called in question. He never, indeed, asserts any special au- thority as the ground on which he is to be listened to, independently of the truth which he taught. If, then, St. Paul claimed no absolute authority over the Church, who shall dare to rest his claims as a teacher solely on the ground of authority ? But there is one thing which is yet even more remarkable. When a sort of general council was held at Jerusalem, under the presidentship of the Apostles, to consider the question whether the Gen- tile converts should be compelled to submit to cir- G 2 84 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. cumcision, which certain men who had gone out from among them had taught was necessary, not a word was breathed about the authority of these teachers, but the whole issue was made to turn upon certain arguments used by the speakers, and more particu- larly upon the fact that God had already bestowed upon these converts the gift of the Holy Ghost, indepen- dently of the administration of any outward ordinance. Now from all this we gather that men are to be recognised as Christ's ministers only if they set forth his truth, and that their authority to teach is derived direct from him : hence we always find them desig- nated in Scripture as " the ministers of Christ" not as ministers of the Church. Their office is to minis- ter to the Church, not to act with some undefined authority of the Church. They are to be Heaven's messengers of peace to the people (2 Cor. v. 20.) : not plenipotentiaries, to grant pardon. Their au- thority to teach is given them by Christ himself in the qualification ; their power of office only is derived from the Church. But this, when duly bestowed, is to be regarded as bearing the stamp of his authority, because Christ, in giving his general sanction to the formation of Christian communities, must be con- sidered as having given his implied sanction to the appointment of all its necessary officers. The minis- try is not, then, the less to be esteemed as a divine ordi- nance for the absence of any specified invariable Orders. He who ordained the Church, and gave to his Apostles plenary power to found it, must necessarily, THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 85 in so ordaining, have given his divine sanction to all such orders of ministers as they might appoint. The next question, then, which comes before us for consideration is, what orders of ministers did the Apostles appoint? in other words, what is the Divine Ideal of the Church in regard to its ministry, as we may discover it developed actually in its recorded ranks of officers ? If we refer to Ephesians iv. 4, we read: "And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers.'* Elsewhere (1 Cor. xii.) we find other ministries, but not other officers, mentioned. Now, since two of the orders, as we have already shown (p. 74), those of apostles and prophets, have ceased, there remain only three others as permanent orders. If we examine the normal Church Epistles of Paul to Timothy and Titus, we find that besides themselves, who were invested with the sort of office which we now assign to bishops, two others only are specified those of priests or presbyters, and deacons. Thus, the three orders recognised by the English Church are the very three, the types of which we can discover beyond all doubt, in the Scripture. There is nothing to prohibit the Church from using other ministries but there is nothing to warrant her appointing other orders of permanent officers. It m*ay be worth while to observe here how very modestly the English Church speaks upon the subject of her ministry. " It is evident, unto all men diligently reading the Holy Scripture and ancient 86 THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. authors, that from the Apostles' time there have been these Orders of ministers in Christ's Church ; bishops, priests, and deacons." She grounds her con- tinuance of these on the fact that " from the Apos- tles' time there have been these orders of ministers." She lays down no exclusive rule, she vaunts of no special authority ; nor, we may add, does she give to her ministers any extraordinary commission, any power, in short, beyond that necessary power of teaching by doctrine, and ruling by discipline, which we find were to be the functions of those whom Timothy and Titus were to ordain. Even where she seems to impart to her priests the power of forgiving sins, she limits it, by immediate implication, to " the faithful dispensing of the word of God, and of his holy Sacraments."* There are some who are very fond of using such language as " the mighty powers of grace stored up in the Church" the " inherent life of the Church" and " the life-imparting power of the Church." Now we might very naturally ask, Where do these mighty stores of grace where does this life, reside ? Is it in the bishops, or in the clergy, or in the sacraments, or in the collective body of the faithful ? and if in any of these, how is it transmitted from them to others ? It is very obvious that it is not through the Church, as having life in itself, that Christ imparts life to the souls of men for, after all, the Church is only the body of Christ ; and if the Church were the store- house and direct source of spiritual influence, then, as * See Service for Ordering 1 of Priests. THE IDEAL OF THE CHURCH. 87 the Church is made up of men, it would be the Church giving life to itself, which is absurd. The most common notion, we believe, is that spiritual life is imparted by the Sacraments, when administered by duly ordained persons, and that these, by their own self-possessed virtue, carry with them an unfailing efficacy ; but as this is a distinct question, it will be best discussed in the next chapter. 88 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. WE are now to enter upon a subject which is at once the most singularly simple, and the most singu- larly mystified and perplexed singularly simple, as all that relates to it stands recorded in the word of God ; singularly mystified and perplexed, as we find it wrought up into a system in the writings of men. That subject is the nature of the two Christian Sacra- ments ; the mode in which they become efficacious of spiritual benefit to the receivers ; and the place which they occupy in the evangelic economy. Now, in treating of this question, it behoves us to speak warily and with caution, lest we should at- tribute either too little or too much to these mystical rites. For, as it is a sin to take away from the word of God, so it is equally a sin to add to it. Some there may be who hold these positive institutes in too light estimation. Others there have been and are, who, while they scruple, rightly enough, in any degree, to attri- bute less to the Sacraments than the express words of Scripture warrant, make no scruple in attributing much more to the utter overlaying and disfigurement of the original appointments. Thus it has come to pass SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 89 that, by having ascribed to them effects which they cannot, and were never intended to work, the Christian Sacraments have been converted into charms, viewed as possessing some inherent virtue, and that which was appointed only to be a sensible aid to faith, has been trusted in as little less than a life-giving God. To take an illustration from a parallel act of re- quired obedience simply to an outward form, as the condition of a benefit to be received, in which there was no self-manifesting natural connection between that act and the effect to attend it it has been as if the command to Naaman, to go and wash seven times in the Jordan, had been a command to go and take clay from the bed of the river, and to fown it into seven images, each more hideous than the other, and then to ascribe to these images certain wonderful powers, by which they should, through their mere touch, have the credit ascribed to them of having wrought the cure of the leprosy. The plastic piety of the half-Pagan converts of the early age, in its unsubdued sensuous imagining, soon wrought, it would seem, upon the simple ordinances of Christianity, and, like a few turns of the wheel of the potter, threw off those (to mere imaginative minds) beautiful forms of spiritual porcelain, which have ever since been the means of charming and deceiving vast multitudes of ardent devotees. The " Fathers," as they are termed, placed themselves between the pure light of the truth and their fellow -men not as clear crystal, to transmit that light pure as it had been received, but as a dark 90 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. intercepting obstacle ; and by their gross interpreta- tions of Scripture, they caused a shadow to be cast upon the ground, in the mystic dimness of which, those who wished to be numbered among the learned, have chosen ever since to walk. But we are assuming. Let us drop figure, and look at the plain facts of the case. Let us divest ourselves, as far as we can, of all prepossessions and traditional notions regarding the two sacramental rites of the Christian institute, and view them, first, precisely as they stand pourtrayed in the terms of their original institution by their Divine author. (See Matt, xxviii. 19, 20, Mark xvi. 15, 16, for Bap- tism. Jokn iii. and other references to this ordinance we shall consider in the sequel; and Matt. xxvi. 2628, Mark xiv. 22, Luke xxii. 19, 20, for the Lord's Supper.) Now, the first thing that strikes us here is, the unencumbered simplicity, not only of form, but of principle, in which these two holy rites of our religion are presented to us. They are made to rest for their observance solely upon the authority of Him who enjoined them. No promise of grace is attached to either of them, nor are they directly asserted to be attended with any spiritual benefit. Certain results only are connected with, or rather made to be conse- quent upon, a due submission to these appointments ; so that their great " moral perfection," as Hooker says, " consisteth in men's devout obedience to the law of God : " their mystical virtue, since there is no SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 91 evidence that it is in the rites themselves, must be de- pendent upon his sovereign will. As was the case with Naaman, to which we have already referred, so here, we are required to act with an implicit faith in the word of Him to whom we have been taught to look for aid under our disease, and to submit ourselves, with- out any of the questioning of unbelief, to an appoint- ment in which there is no natural or traceable con- nection between the thing prescribed to be done, and the effect expected to be wrought. It would seem, then, from this (and such, we think, would be the inference in any unprepossessed mind), that the efficacy of the Sacraments, whatever it be, rests primarily upon the fiat of Him who instituted them ; and that the benefit of them to us, whatever that be, is conveyed to us through the medium of our own believing obedience. But though there is not, as we have observed, any express promise of grace to commend to us the Sacraments, in the institutionary form of words used by their Divine Author, yet there is, we must not fail to remark, an implied promise, both in the known character of Him who enjoined them, and in the elemental significance of the Sacra- ments themselves. It may be taken, indeed, as a sure axiom in theology, that whatever God enjoins to be done, involves a blessing in the doing of it. It does so morally, by its immediate beneficial effect upon the agent ; for it is not only good in itself, but it is also good for us to obey. It does so positively, because the very nature of God, the relation in which he 92 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. stands to his creatures, his character as revealed in his word, pledges him to bless the obedient. Moreover, from the selection made to constitute the visible signs in the Sacraments, we may also infer that there must be a certain benefit, or spiritual effect, attendant upon the due reception of them ; for, as Hooker observes : " The matter whereof they consist is such as signifieth, figureth, and representeth their end." No one can fail to perceive that there is in water, when used as a consecrated emblem, an evident relation to the washing away of sins ; and in bread and wine, when so used, a relation to the nourishment of the soul. In general terms, we may assert then, that to be signs of grace communicated, or spiritual efficacy, is one end for which the Christian Sacraments were instituted. If we look further into the New Testament state- ments in relation to these ordinances, we find them strongly insisted on indeed as duties, but nothing ascribed to them which would imply that their efficacy is resident in the Sacraments themselves.* They are clearly, in some sense, means and instru- ments unto salvation, or they would not have been * Even St. Bonaventura denies that grace is contained in the Sacraments. His words are : " Non est aliquo modo dicendum, quod gratia contineatur in ipsis sacramentis essentialiter, tanquam aqua in vase vel medecina inpyxide ; imohoc intelligere est erroneum. Sed dicuntur continere gratiam, quia ipsam significant, et quia, nisi ibi sit defectus ex parte suscipientis, in ipsis gratia semper confertur, ita intelligendo quod gratia sit in animo, non in signis visibilibus." Sen- tent., lib. iv., dist. 1, qusest. 3. Opp. torn. v., p. 7. SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 93 ordained ; while yet they are never spoken of in Scripture as possessing any saving virtue. Take the strongest expressions in regard to them on record such as, " Arise, and be baptised, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord" (Actsxxii. 16). " The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us" (1 Peter iii. 21). " The cup of blessing which we Hess, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?" (1 Cor. x. 16.) There is nothing in these passages which is not so qualified by other expressions in the context, as to guard us wholly against the idea that the consequences here spoken of are the effects of the Sacraments themselves. In the first case, " calling upon the Lord " is connected with, implying the necessity for, the coexistent action of believing prayer ; in the next, Baptism, it is true, is expressly said to " save us ;' but then how ? Not absolutely, or by any inherent power of its own (the Apostle interjects a parenthesis to restrict the appli- cation of his own expression) it is not " the putting away the filth of the flesh" in other words, it is not the mere outward washing that " saves us" but " the answer of a good conscience towards God, by the resur- rection of Jesus Christ from the dead" as the real efficient cause. Baptism, which is the antitype to the ark of Noah, is the outward sign and mode of salvation ; but this answer of a good conscience towards God by sincere repentance and faith in Jesus Christ, is the thing signified, which is actually saving. 94 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. Upon the efficacy of the Lord's Supper, considered simply as a Sacrament, we will not dwell, since there is even less ascribed to it in Scripture than to Baptism ; and whatever can be proved to be absolutely or neces- sarily true of the one, will involve all that appertains to the other. In the passages to which we have already referred, we have shown that there is nothing predi- cated of Baptism which can, by any just and fair interpretation, be construed to warrant the conclusion that this Sacrament possesses in itself, or invariably carries with it, any saving power. Nor, if we take in those other Scripture statements (John iii., Titus iii. 5) which are generally supposed to have reference to Baptism, have we gained any more solid ground for building up a theory of inherent sacramental efficacy. For in John iii. the pure absolute thing insisted on is, the necessity of being " lorn again"* (v. 3) ; and water is not mentioned till a fuller ex- planation of what was the modus of this new birth was demanded. Then there is the statement made, " except a man be born of water, and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." Thus it appears that these two things together, not one of them alone, is equivalent to the thing denoted by the expression, "being born again" or from above. The being " born of water" then, evidently stands only in a subordinate, external, or significative relation to the * The heading- of the chapter is, " Christ teacheth Nicodemus the necessity of regeneration," not of baptism. SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 95 being " born of the Spirit" Nicodemus, as a Jew, knew what it was to be " born of water" but what he could not understand, was the being " lorn again" or from above. Our Lord, therefore, solemnly assures him that a man must be born, not only of water, or of John's Baptism, with which he was acquainted (for if Nicodemus had not known what it was to be born of water, how could that have helped him to understand what our Lord was aiming by this phrase to explain ?) ; but also of the Spirit, of which the water used in Baptism was the divinely ordained significant. That something beyond the new birth by^water, or Baptism, was intended to be taught as necessary in order for a man to enter into the king- dom of God, is plain, from the reason immediately assigned " that which is born of the flesh" or in the natural way, " is flesh, and that (only) which is born of the Spirit is spirit." On the ground of this un- deniable law of being, Christ begs Nicodemus not to wonder at his first statement, "ye must be bom again" or from above (v. 7). To illustrate the mystery of this new birth still further, he refers to the " wind" which, he observes, "bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth : so is every one that is born of the Spirit." This very illustration entirely overthrows the idea that a uniform, unfailing effect attends the outward adminis- tration of Baptism by water, or the doctrine that the birth of water and the birth of the Spirit are linked 96 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. together by an inseparable tie, so that wherever the material element is duly applied, the inward spiritual effect is wrought. For, if every person who is thus born of water, be invariably, at the same time, born of the Spirit, where is the fitness of the figure ? Upon this supposition there would be neither mystery nor uncon- trollable uncertainty about the result, but the new birth of the Spirit would be dependent upon the will of man, as to the when he would please to administer tjie outward rite. But not so; for as -the wind that bloweth when and where it listeth, so is every one that is born of the Spirit. It is most manifest, therefore, from our Lord's own illustration, if it has any point or propriety at all, that no invariable inherent or imparted virtue abides in the water; nor any certain or constant effect attends its application in baptism to ensure spiritual regeneration. All that we can fairly argue from this passage is, that submission to the outward rite of Baptism is a conditional means a divinely required preliminary to our receiving the inward benefit, being a token and sign of our faith ; for, as the sign and the thing signified are joined together by God's institution, they must not be separated in our apprehensions; but if we would be ensured of the one, we must pay a reverent regard to the other. The very principle of Sacraments is, that they signify something ; and in order to show what they signify, the sign and the thing signified are usually placed in the word of God in close juxta-position, so SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 97 that they stand before us as shadows directing to a sub- stance. When the sun of truth is above our horizon, the shadow is plain, and easily distinguishable from the substance. When it is below, both look to us alike, and are taken the one for the other. In heaven alone, where the sun may be said to stand always in the meridian, there will be no shadow, for there Sacra- ments will cease, merged in the visible reality. The other passage which we have referred to (Titus iii. 5) as being supposed to relate to Baptism, is a remarkable instance of this bringing of the sign, and the thing signified, into immediate juxtaposition, and giving to the one the name of that which is wrought by the other. God is there declared to have saved us jointly by " the washing of regeneration' (an expression that aptly, from the ordained end of the rite, denotes baptism) ; and " the renewing of the Holy Ghost" which is the real thing signified. They who contend that baptism is regeneration actually, and charge those with disparaging the Sacra- ment who deny this, commit a much more serious mistake (if mistake that be) ; for they are guilty, by insisting so exclusively upon the "washing of regenera- tion" as the real thing, of altogether setting aside, theo- retically, at least, " the renewing of the Holy Ghost" which is the spiritual process thereby denoted.* * Jewel, in his reply to Harding (p. 442), makes this very pertinent remark " Verily, to ascribe felicity or remission of sin, which is the inward work of the Holy Ghost, unto any manner of outward action whatever, is a superstitious, a gross, and a Jewish error." H 98 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. To ascertain the exact place of Sacraments is cer- tainly one of the most difficult points in systematic theo- logy. That they have some important connection with salvation is so evident from Holy Scripture, that no one will presume to deny it who has any proper respect to the Divine word. " He that believeth and is baptised" we are told (Mark xvi.), " shall be saved" Salvation then plainly is, in some way, dependent upon Baptism. But we must be careful that we do not press, even a positive statement like this, too far. For this positive most strongly implies in it a negative limitation to this effect : He that believeth not, though he be baptised, shall not be saved. And this point, the next clause, without relation to which this ought never to be taken, brings out with the most instruc- tive negative significance : " And he that believeth not shall be damned" not simply, he who is not baptised. The omission of this in the negative expression of the sentence, where it would seem to be required to the full completion of the antithesis, was surely not without its design. It is upon this, we need hardly observe, our Church grounded her limitation in the catechism in regard to the necessity of the Sacraments, when she taught her catechumens to say, in answer to the question : " How many Sacraments hath Christ or- dained in his Church ?" " Two only, as generally * necessary to salvation." * That is, not absolutely or in every case, but only " where they may be had," as stated in the service for the baptism of adults. It would be quite beside our purpose to enter here into the question SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 99 The doctrine then involved in this passage of scripture is clearly this, that Baptism is necessary as a sign of that obedience of faith which is unto salvation necessary only as a general rule, but not so absolutely necessary (which it must be, if the grace of Sacra- ments be never communicated except through the channel of Sacraments, or if the grace that saves be in the Sacraments themselves) that there can be no salvation without it. Ordinarily necessary, but not essentially necessary, is all that we are warranted in predicating of Baptism by this the strongest dogmatic delivery upon the subject made by our Divine Lord. There is, however, yet another class of references to this ordinance which, to treat the subject fairly, we must not pass unnoticed. In the Apostolic Epistles we meet with frequent allusions to Baptism, and it is spoken of there in terms, to say the least, of consider- able strength. And as it is to this part of Scripture we are taught to look for the full development of Christian doctrines which had been left obscure, or only darkly hinted at, in the Gospels, it is to the same we naturally turn for further information, if there be any to be given, touching the nature, inten- of infant baptism, or to discuss how far, in their case, it is efficacious. We would only remark, en passant, that if the salvation of infants depends absolutely upon their receiving- baptism, which is what some seem to hold, then it depends upon the seal of God's covenant rather than upon God's covenant itself, though that, as including- his pro- mises, is the real ground of all our hopes. The seal may be of great advantage to assure salvation without itself giving salvation ; and it is the contempt of this, not the want of it, it is most reasonable to believe, will exclude from the benefits of God's covenant. H 2 100 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. tion, and efficacy of Christian baptism. What, then, is the witness borne to this divine institution, con- sidered as involving a doctrine, in the writings of the Apostles ? The only statements of any weight (besides those we have already noticed) are these : (Rom. vi. 3, 4, 1 Cor. xii. 13, Gal. iii. 27, Col. ii. 12) "Know ye not" says the Apostle in the first of them, " that so many of us as were baptised into Jesus Christ were baptised into his death ? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life." " For by one Spirit we are all baptised into one body 9 ivhether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free : and have been all made to drink into one Spirit " (1 Cor. xii. 13.) " For as many of you as have been baptised into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female : for ye are all one in Christ Jesus' (Gal. iii. 27). " Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised Him from the dead" (Col. ii. 12). Now, the first and last of these may be classed under one head. They both, it is very clear, refer to Baptism in its representative character, just as the Church of England states it in the exhortation at the end of the baptismal office. There is no efficacy ascribed to the rite in either of them to produce the effects which, by the figure of a significant action, it denotes to be SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 101 necessary in any person to constitute him a real Chris- tian. And if it could be argued from these passages that effects of a higher order, and of a more positive nature, than this were attendant, as the actual con- sequences of baptism in any to whom it is administered, it would necessarily follow that they would be in all a result which fact decisively negatives. Baptism, then, is here spoken of according to what it signifies only in relation to our duties, not what it actualises. In the other two passages quoted, the rite, as the context shows, is referred to in relation to the body of the Church. The Apostle brings it forward in proof that there is now no longer any distinction between nations, races, and ranks of mankind in regard to their religious condition, if they are Christians, for as all take upon themselves one profession by baptism, all are by this made to be members of one corporate body, of which Christ is the head. The expression, " have put on Christ" evidently, by the very nature of the figure used, relates to profession. It may, however, be urged, perhaps, that in the other of these two passages (1 Cor. xii. 13), Baptism is spoken of as an act of the Spirit, and in such a way as to imply that all who are so baptised are thereby made partakers of the Spirit. To this we answer, very true ; but then it is to be observed particularly, that it is not of the baptism of water, but of the baptism of the Spirit, the Apostle here speaks (" for by one Spirit ye are all baptised into one body"), consequently, the " body" here intended must be the true spiritual Church, 102 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. " the mystical body of Christ, consisting of the blessed company of all faithful people." None but those who are baptised by, or with the Spirit, are in this body at all. There may be, and no doubt is, an allusion to water baptism, as the visible mode by which we are admitted into this body, in the word " baptised, " as also to the Holy Communion in the expression, " have been all made to drink into one Spirit ; " but as, con- fessedly, not all who partake of the Holy Communion, do " drink into one Spirit," so neither, by parity of reason, can we conclude from this verse that all who are baptised with water are baptised into one Spirit. There is, then, no power in the ordinance of baptism itself to graft into Christ. The most that we can infer from this, the strongest statement of the kind on record in the Epistles,, is, that they who " receive baptism rightly," are, instrumentally by the Sacrament, and vitally by the Spirit, made members of Christ's body the Spirit being the real efficient agent in producing life in all who are living members. For no life impart- ing power is here ascribed to the rite of baptism itself; that is not the main idea, the principal subject of the passage but rather the Spirit's all pervading agency in every produced spiritual result. The altered relation here supposed to be brought about in and through, not by baptism, is only union with the living lody of the Church. It may be worth while to remark in this place, that, if to be " born of water " involved necessarily the being " born of the Spirit" or if the one might be taken to be SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. .,, v - _ the constant concomitant of the other, because of the juxtaposition of the two expressions, then, vice versa, to be " born of the Spirit" would necessarily imply that the person was " born of water" whether water had ever been used or not, which is manifestly absurd. Putting together then, now, into one view, all that the New Testament expresses in regard to Baptism, the whole of what we can conclude as respects the Sacrament itself (unless we will presume to be wise above what is written) amounts only to this : that it is an ordinance of Divine ordainment ; that it engrafts every person to whom it is applied into the visible body of the Church; that "the promises of the forgiveness of sin, and of our adoption to be the sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are hereby visibly signed and sealed;" that without submission to it, ordinarily, there is no salvation ; that it is thus a conditional, though not an efficient means of grace grace being a gracious consequent rather than a necessary result of the ordinance; that they who receive it " rightly," are made the subjects of the Spirit's influence ; but that in no instance is the grace of Sacra- ments contained in the Sacraments themselves, or, ne- cessarily, as in a material substance, conveyed by them ; so that, strictly speaking, they carry with them no inherent or vital efficacy, being, as the venerable Hooker has well said, "not physical but moral in- struments of salvation, duties of service and worship, the use whereof is in our hands, the effect in God's ; which, unless we perform as the Author of grace 104 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. requireth, they are unprofitable ; for all receive not the grace of God, who receive the Sacraments of his grace " (p. 595). In a word, Sacraments are exhi- bitive, not communicative, of grace ; external seals, not operative agents ; sure witnesses of God's good will, not of themselves effective workers of those heavenly dispositions of mind which mark the true Christian, which, wherever found, are the results of the divine favour. They indicate to all what are their spiritual needs ; they imply special obligations ; they are signs to signify grace ; but they are seals to assure it, and instruments of the Holy Ghost to apply it, and that, not as a medicine, but after a moral manner, only to real believers in Christ. Such is the general view which we gather of Sacraments from a survey of all that is predicated of them in the New Testament. But now, how very different is the represen- tation often given of them in the writings of men. They are " causes efficient ; " they " carry in them the grace which they signify ; " they are " essentially necessary to salvation ; " they " work an entire change in the individual " (though an unconscious babe) to whom they are administered. Baptism of itself is declared to " wash away sins ;" " it imparts an angelic nature to the recipient ; " by it man is " formed anew" is born again, in all cases, of the Spirit; the " miracu- lous water is impregnated with the Holy Ghost ; " and giving life is hence pronounced to be " life-giving." It is a point of moment to the integrity of the SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 105 truth that these assertions should be disproved. How shall we disprove them? As the letter of Scrip- ture is not sufficient of itself to bar out such extravagant notions but they profess to find their warrant in it it clearly will not be sufficient, taken as it stands, to refute them. All reference to any authority, ab extra, to decide whether the doctrine in- volved in them be true, is out of the question ; for it is upon the authority of human interpretation alone the doctrine rests. We must have recourse to argument. We must make sure of our data. We must reason upon Scripture premises, and apply them. This is the way we proceed in order to ascertain what is true, and to distinguish it from what is false in philosophy. And as false systems of philosophy are not overthrown by adducing seeming individual departures from its laws, but rather by the ascertainment of some great general law, which accounts for all those seeming departures by referring them to one common prin- ciple, so we must cast about for the discovery of some general spiritual principle in relation to Sacra- ments, which, while it accounts for, denies not any actual effects, observed ever to be consequent upon, or apparently wrought by, Baptism, if we would explode all false notions, and bring out in its severe simplicity the one only law, or cause, of sacramental efficacy. Any man who possesses the genius of the genuine philosopher, will not in his divinity, any more than in his philosophy, allow his judgment to be carried away by what may be only exceptional cases or deceptive 106 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. appearances, instantice monodicce, as Lord Bacon calls them ; but his watchful eye and thoughtful mind will be exercised in the discovery of the law, or causative principle, which prevails in all the cases. The apple will not fall from the tree without his inferring the cause of its descending in every instance towards the earth ; nor will the fire ascend without flashing into his mind the causing power of its ascent. Where a person of a less philosophic cast of character will get perplexed and bewildered amidst a multiplicity of apparent con- tradictory instances (all of which, if he could but see it, are reducible to one or other of two laws), he will seize hold of some general principle, and apply it to solve every difficulty, and to account for every effect, which may be classed as falling under the denomina- tion of the phenomena of religion. Divinity has, it may be assumed, its laws, or gen- eral principles, as much as natural philosophy ; and just as in natural philosophy, the observance of these enables us to explain all the mysteries of the material world, and to assign the causes of all the various phe- nomena we witness in that, so it is in divinity. The laws of nature are, we know, few, and sublimely simple; and yet every effect, every strange appearance, every startling result, is reducible to one or other of them : so, we believe it will be found to be in regard to the laws of what may be termed spiritual science. Our great Teacher, it has been truly observed, com- bined in himself as much of the character of a philoso- pher as of a divine. His observations and parables and SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 107 incidental remarks, evinced a most profound insight into the laws of nature, or the principles which hold sway in the material economy of this visible world; and by his seizing hold of these principles, and applying them, as he often did, to the illustration of spiritual truths, he has led us to infer that spiritual operations are subject, in the same way, to "general laws," and are brought about by agencies equally accordant with their own nature as things material.* No man, indeed, ever possessed in a more surpassing degree than our Lord, that highest faculty of genius, the power of generalisation ; in other words, the power of reducing a number of facts or operations many of them perhaps apparently very diverse to one simple prin- ciple. A very striking example of this we have in his resolving the whole of the first table of the law into the one principle of the love of God, and the whole of the second into the love of our neighbour. Nor was his generalising genius confined to the acts merely of an external Amoral law ; it penetrated into those which were purely spiritual, and assigned all effects to their proper agencies, never ascribing to a physical agent or * Of the general laws or principles to which we have alluded, the following are instances : " He that saveth his life shall lose it, and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it." This is the law of self- sacrifice, of the truth of which our Lord gives this illustration from nature : " Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it re- maineth alone, but if it die it bringeth forth much fruit." Again : " To him that hath shall be given, and to him that hath not shall be taken away, even that which he seemeth to have." Again : " If any man will do his will he shall know of the doctrine whether it be of God." These are all general principles, and many others might be given out of the Gospels. 108 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. instrumentality that which could be wrought only by one of a different nature. " The flesh profrteth nothing" says this keen observer of causes ; it is the Spirit that quickeneth." One general observation applies to these general principles, that they are universal and infallible tests of truth. As such they ought to be taken ; for it is only by subjecting our theories or opinions to the test of one of these primal and all-pervading laws that we can ascertain whether or not they are sound. If a theory or opinion in religion will bear its own proper test of this kind, it may be concluded that it is founded in truth ; if it will not bear this, it is certainly false. What, then, is the law or principle wilich applies to the question of sacramental efficacy ? It is that laid down by our Lord in his memorable conversation with Nicodemus in these words, " That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit" At first sight, there seems nothing in this statement beyond the enunciation of a self-evident truth, taking the term "flesh" in its natural sense ; but when we come to examine in what sense this term is used, theologically or in relation to doctrine in Scripture,* we at once perceive that the statement * Examples of this peculiar use of this term are the following- : " What hath Abraham our father found through the flesh ?' (Rom. iv. 1 , translated as it stands in the original,) " Having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?" (Gal. iii. 3.) " For we are the circumcision which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh." (Phil, iii, 3.) " If any man thinketh that he hath whereof he might glory in the flesti, I more." "As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh." (Gal. iii, 12.) In all of which places the term flesh is evidently put for SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 109 is far more than an answer to the ignorant objection which called it forth, and enunciates, in fact, a gen- eral principle, applicable to all questions of religious influence, or of produced spiritual effect. When ex- pressed in a philosophic form, that principle is this : that no effect can rise above its cause, and that, such as the generating cause or agent employed in any case is, such in nature will be the effect. This is an abso- lute verity, and all the sophists in the world could not disprove it, that no effect can rise above its cause. This, then, may be taken as an axiom in moral, as it is in natural science. Now, if we take this simple prin- ciple and apply it, as it ought to be applied, with an honest mind and a fearless hand, it will slip the key- stone out of many a towering fabric of false doctrine, and bring it down to its proper level, the dust ; leav- ing foundation room for the erection in its place of that solid system of divinity, every block' of which is of pure white marble, which will bear the most searching test, and stand for eternity. It is always necessary to remove the obstructions of error from the mind first, and the heaps of superstition which may have accumulated, if we would ground it securely upon the rock of eternal Truth. Assuming this, then, as an axiom in divinity, how does it apply to the question before us ? the question of sacramental efficacy. It at once determines this all that is external in religion, all that is of the nature of ceremony, or outward rite. In accordance with which sense of the word, the Apostle Paul uses the expression " carnal ordinances" in Heb. ix. 10. 110 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. point, that the material element employed in the ad- ministration of Baptism can exercise no manner of influence whatever in the production of any attendant spiritual effect. Neither can it be the medium, properly speaking, or agent, of any such effect ; for spiritual effect is never wrought by any material agent. It can be wrought only by an agent of the same nature with itself. Obvious and certain as this truth is in relation to things natural, it has been very commonly overlooked in regard to things spiritual. With that proneness to superstition and idolatry for which fallen man is remarkable, and which inclines him ever to ascribe to things visible and tangible those effects which are wrought only by the invisible and spiritual, he has been led to regard those material substances, which the Almighty, in condescension to our weakness, has appointed as signs for the help of our faith, as efficient causes has hence been led to put his trust in them, and not in Him, and has thus given to the creature that honour which belongs only to the Creator. A spiritual birth (such as the new birth is) can, it is evident, be produced only by a spiritual agent. Water may be the outward sign of the effects of that agent upon the soul, but it can never itself be the efficient cause or immediate agent by which the new birth is directly brought about ; for then a spiritual birth would be consequent upon the application of a material element ; which, upon the principle asserted by our Lord, can never be the result. Such as SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. Ill the nature of the agent employed is, such, he affirms, is the nature of the progeny. Clearly, then, the material element of water in baptism can, of itself, be only a bare sign. There is one objection, however, to this view of the case, which may be raised. It may be said, cannot the Almighty impart a spiritual property to the con- secrated water, whereby that may become efficacious of a spiritual benefit upon the soul ? The obvious answer is, that the water is applied only externally to the body in baptism, and is not conveyed into the soul, as would, in the very nature of things, be necessary, if the new birth were produced in it by this element as an efficient agent. But besides this obvious answer, we may remark, that there is no ground in Scripture, nor in any of God's known works or operations, for believing that he thus confounds things of an opposite nature, or ever produces any creature but by an agent of the same nature as itself. Those who are born again are indeed, expressly, and with marked distinction, spoken of in Scripture as born, "Not of blood, nor of the mill of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God " (John i. 13) ; and if not by the mill of man, which is a spiritual agent, much less by a material agent of man's application. If the new birth, or spiritual regeneration, were the imparted and invariable effect of baptism, then surely it is most strange that St. Paul should speak so dis- paragingly of the ministration of this rite, as he does in the first chapter of his first epistle to the Coriii- 112 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. thians. Upon this assumption the baptising of men would be the highest possible ministerial function, for it would be attended with an effect of a life-giving, and therefore of a truly divine order. But beyond question no such idea could have possessed the Apostle's mind, when he "thanked God" that he had baptised so few persons with his own hands. It was to the word of God, and not to water, he looked for a divine power. But still those who hold the doctrine of regeneration through the agency of water, not sacramentally merely, but actually, or what is usually termed " baptismal re- generation,"* may argue that as it is of God's appoint- ing, it is his appointment which renders it efficacious for this end. To which we reply, first, that the blood of bulls and of goats was of God's appointing, but that did not give it the power to take away sins ; and, secondly, that it is not the application of the water that in any way is operative to the production of the new birth, but our own right use of the Sacrament, in the exercise of faith in God's promise, and in the power of the Divine Spirit to act directly upon the heart of sinful man, to produce there the purity of the new life. For, obviously, moral effects can be brought about only by moral and not by material means. One very common mode of describing Sacraments * There would be no just ground to object to this form of ex- pression, if those who use it would allow the adjective, as it ought, to qualify the substantive. Spiritual regeneration is the thing prayed for by the church : baptismal, or sacramental regeneration, is the thing pronounced as imparted by the administration of the rite. SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 113 is to speak of them as "channels of grace." But how they can be " channels," properly speaking, unless grace be a material substance which can be conveyed through a material medium, does not appear. It can only be by a figure of speech that they are channels. For grace is neither kneaded into dough in the Lord's Supper, nor melted into water in Baptism, that it can be conveyed after the manner of a physical agent into man's nature ; nor is salvation wrought even by the word of God, but as that acts morally, or as a moral agent, direct upon the mind.* Of the absurd notion that regeneration is wrought in and by baptism, and is identical with it, there is a withering refutation to be found in Coleridge's " Aids to Reflection." In answer to those who say that regeneration is only baptism, that thoughtful man remarks, " I think it sufficient to reply : if regene- ration means baptism, baptism must mean regenera- tion : and this, too, as Christ himself has declared, a regeneration in the spirit. Now I would ask these divines this simple question : Do they believingly sup- pose a spiritual regenerative power and agency inher- ing in or accompanying the sprinkling of a few drops of water on an infant's face ? They cannot evade the question by saying that baptism is a type or sign. For this would be to supplant their own assertion, * The term " convey " as applied to " grace," is equally incorrect, unless it be taken in its technical legal sense ; for as Bishop Bedell remarks, " obsignation is the sole and only instrumental conveyance which the sacraments have." Letter to Dr. Samuel Ward, quoted by Goode (p. 321). I 114 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. that regeneration means baptism, by the contradictory admission that regeneration is the significatum of which baptism is the significant. Unless indeed they would incur the absurdity of saying that regeneration is a type of regeneration, and baptism a type of itself ; or, that baptism only means baptism. And this, indeed, is the plain consequence to which they must be driven, should they answer the above question in the negative. But if their answer be, Yes, we do suppose this efficiency in the baptismal act, I have not another word to say. Only, perhaps, I might be permitted to express a hope that, for consistency sake, they would speak less slightingly of the insufflation and extreme unction of the Papists ; notwithstanding the not easily to be answered arguments of our Christian Mercury, the all-eloquent Jeremy Taylor, respecting the latter : " which since it is used when the man is above half-dead, when he can exercise no act of understanding, it must needs be nothing. For no rational man can think that any ceremony can make a spiritual change without a spiritual act of him who is to be changed : nor can it work by way of nature, or by charm, but morally, and after the manner of reasonable creatures." There is strong, plain truth also in that remark of Bishop Bedell's, " Verily I think this conceit of Sacraments to make them medicines is the root of all error in this matter." The gross absurdity of the thing, would, we might suppose, be sufficient to evince that the grace signified in the Sacraments is not con- SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 115 tained in the signs. For if by grace be meant the favour and good-will of God, if pardon and forgive- ness of sin, if cleansing and renewing power, if finally the holy influence of the Spirit, what can be imagined more senseless, and more absurd, than that such ex- cellent and heavenly things as these, should be inclosed in the material elements of water, bread, and wine, and be by them conveyed through the body into the soul ! The signs have no need of grace, nor of pardon and forgiveness ; nor can they, properly speaking, convey grace. To what purpose, then, should grace be communicated to them, that in and through them it might be received ? How can such a mode of recep- tion profit the souls of men ? But this method of arguing is, it will perhaps be said, pure Rationalism, and finds its type only in the Syrian captain's question, "Are not Abana and Pharpar, rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel ? May I not wash in them, and be clean ? " The truth is, his reasoning was right as re- garded the subject ; it was not the waters of one river more than of another, that could cleanse him of his leprosy ; but the power of that God, whose command, as a token of his faith, he was required to obey. Nor was any priestly act of man's needed to give effect to the applied element. No words were rehearsed either over Naaman, or over the Jordan,to impart power to the waters to cleanse (and power of themselves they had none) ; but it was the faith which led the man to submit to the divine appointment that was the real i 2 116 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. means effectual to the obtaimnent of the benefit. So in all cases, what is required is the opus operantis, the faith of the receiver, rather than the opus operatum, the work of the minister. Great stress is laid by some divines upon what is termed the " consecration " of the elements, and their administration by a Priest. It is argued, that be- cause Sacraments can be administered only by men of a consecrated order, therefore their effect must depend in some way upon ministerial power. But here Hooker supplies us with a just answer. " The grace of Bap- tism cometh by donation from God alone. That God hath committed the ministry of Baptism to special men, it is for order sake in his Church, and not to the end that their authority might give or add more force to the Sacrament itself" (p. 627). As to the consecration itself, it may safely be conceded, that although it adds no efficacy to the element, it im- presses upon it a new significancy ; and. that while it in no wise changes its nature, it gives to it a new end. Just as wax is only wax till the seal of the Sovereign is imprinted upon it, so water is only water till it is consecrated ; then it becomes a sacramental sign- not to impart grace, but to assure grace. Some efficacy in Sacraments, we shall perhaps be told, we, as English Churchmen, must admit there is, because the Church defines them to be " effectual signs of grace." We grant it : but without admitting the objector's interpretation of the term "effectual; " To affirm that they are "effectual signs SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 117 of grace/' is a very different thing from affirming that they are " signs effectual of grace; " which is the inter- pretation put upon this phrase by some writers who are not at all wanting in other matters in mental acuteness. But that signs can be productive of the effects which they signify only by an outward figure, is a thing we may believe perhaps when we find that painted fire can burn.* The fact is, these writers confound things that differ ; they fail to distinguish between effectual and effective, and convert an effectual sign into an effectual cause.-f And herein they exhibit a childish ignorance. For what man of sense, when told that a loud clap of distant thunder was a power- ful sign of a heavy storm approaching, would under- stand such an expression to mean that that sign was powerful to produce the storm. A sign is a sign, and nothing more. But a sign may properly enough be termed an effectual sign, when it is not a bare sign of profession merely, or figure only of a something that is non-existent, but of a really existent effect produced, * Thus Johnson explains " effectual" to mean sometimes, "vera- cious," "expressive of facts." f Tn what sense, and to what degree, Sacraments may be affirmed to be causes efficient, is thus accurately defined by Dr. Win. Whitaker, who was Regius Professor of Divinity at Cambridge in 1580 : "Dicimus enim esse efficacissima organa Spiritus Sancti, et esse causas etiam instrumentales gratise ; et hoc illi dicunt etiam (. e. Pon- titicii), sed aliter illi, aliter nos. Nos dicimus esse instrumenta, su- mendo hoc nomen large, quia Deus utitur is iis in conferendo nobis gratiam Non ergo sunt sacramenta causse instrumentales gratia, aliquid per se operando, sed quia sacramentis adhibitis Deus in anima gratiam operatur ; ergo sacramenta nihil ex opere operato effi- ciunt, id est, ob id tantum quia adhibentur." Preelection de Sacra- mentis (p. 6'2-f)3). 118 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY,, or signified as a thing to be produced.* And hence, as Sacraments are signs of effects really wrought, or to be wrought by the grace of God, in them that believe, therefore they are described as " effectual signs ; " not because they produce the effects of which they are signs (that is impossible), but because they are signs of effects actually though invisibly produced, where the grace of God is present to work with the sacra- ment or sign.f That this is the sense in which the composers of our Articles used the expression "effectual signs," may be easily made evident by a few quotations from their writings. Thus, Cranmer, speaking of the pre- scribed form for the administration of the Sacraments, says, " Christ useth not so many words without effect- ual signification ; " he " effectually worketh, not in the bread and wine, but in the godly receiver of them " (p. 34). Again: "Which although they (bread wine, and water) have no holiness in them, yet they be signs and tokens of the marvellous works and holy effects which God worketh in us by his own omnipo- tent power" (p. 11). Again: "And although the * Sacraments are not, therefore, nuda et inefficacia signa, be- cause, as Bishop Bedell says, " All that come to the sacrament, elect or non-elect, receive the pardon of sin, original and actual, sacramentally ; and whosoever performs the condition of the covenant, hath the fruition of that, whereof before he had the grant under seal." t The Franciscans make the sacraments to be effectual because God gives them effectus regulariter concomitantes ; and to contain grace no otherwise than as an effectual sign : and that grace is received by them as an investiture by a ring or staff, that is, obsignan&o ; which is an opinion that comes much nearer the truth than that held by many of our professed Protestant divines. SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. 119 sacramental tokens be only significations and figures, yet doth Almighty God effectually work in them that duly receive the sacraments, those divine and celestial operations which he hath promised, and by the sacra- ments be signified." Bishop Ridley remarks (p. 19), that Christ's words spoken upon the cup are as " effect- ual in signification" as spoken upon the bread. The same writer in another place says, " I confess Christ's natural body to be in the sacraments indeed by Spirit and grace, because that whosoever receiveth worthily that bread and wine, receiveth effectually Christ's body and drinketh his blood (that is, he is made effect- ually partaker of his passion)" (p. 274). Archbishop Grindal observes (p. 62) that the sacrament "doth effectually lay before the eyes Christ's body." Why ? Obviously, not because it made his body to be actually there (that was not his doctrine), nor because its end was effectually wrought by the sacrament, but because it was evidently, or in effect, as we say, seen in the sign. Our Reformers never supposed the sign to have any power in itself, or imparted to it, to produce its signified effect ; for, to quote Cranmer (the original author of our Articles) again, " Sacraments are signs to assure us, not signs so much by carnal observation to affect us, and work in us." * * It is very curious that even Hooker uses the word " effectual " in relation to the Sacraments, in the same qualified sense, when he explains them to be " means effectual whereby God, when we take the sacraments, delivereth into our hands that grace available unto eternal life, which grace the sacraments represent or signify" not, be it observed, themselves effectuate. 120 SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. The doctrine which ascribes sacramental efficacy to the outward signs per se is, we may observe, as un- philosophical as it is theologically erroneous. The whole of what we know of the operations of nature (and " nature," we must remember, is but another name for the method of God's working) tends to disprove it. For how are all the great operations of nature wrought ? Not by the things that we see around us (they are but the signs of the Divine Power), but by secret invisible agencies. We call those things indeed causes, which fall under our observation as the imme- diate agents ; but they are rather means and instru- ments than, properly speaking, causes. We speak of the earth as bringing forth, of the water as fructifying, of the air as animating, and of the sun as ripening ; but is it not really these agents that produce these effects, but it is He who is the source of life, and the energising influence in all agencies, who makes use of these various means, and by them works their several effects. Just so it is in relation to Sacra- ments, only with this difference, that as the latter have respect to a moral subject, and not a natural, they work after a moral manner indeed, as signs of God's grace, they address themselves directly to the mind. That some efficacy attends Sacraments, when received rightly, only with this limitation as to the mode, we may safely conclude. But what is the precise nature or extent of the grace of Sacraments, or how that grace operates to produce its effect, we SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. cannot pretend to determine ; nor does it boot for us to know. It would be presumption in us to inquire too nicely into the way in which God works upon the human spirit to effect its regeneration ; nor does it become us to pry too inquisitively into the reasons of God's peculiar appointments. Let it suffice for us to be certified that such and such things are ordained of God, for such and such ends, and required of us as the condition of benefits to be received, and then let us, with child-like simplicity, submit to his appoint- ments. To ordain laws is God's belie vingly to obey is ours. Of one thing, however, we may feel absolutely certain ; and that is, that whatever grace accompanies Sacraments, it is to be traced, not to the Sacraments themselves, but to that Great Divine Spirit, the Third Person in the Ever Blessed Trinity, who may, by way of distinction, be described as Deity in action. All souls are subject to his control, and may be benefited by his secret operation. "It is the Spirit that quicJceneth." That He should please to work by means of visible elements as signs, must be regarded only as an economy accommodated so far to our sensible con- dition, and designed in the way of help to our dull apprehensions of spiritual realities. But that any real virtue is in the elements themselves, or is imparted through them, except as our faith in the Giver of all grace makes them the medium of its apprehensions, SACRAMENTAL EFFICACY. none can prove.* For Sacraments were not insti- tuted to give grace, but to be witnesses of God's grace. " Christ," as Bullinger has well said, " is the strength and substance of the Sacraments, by whom only they are effectual, and without whom they are of no power, virtue, or effect." He, through the Spirit, who in the economy of redemption acts subordinately to Him, works an effectual change in all those who constitute the living members of his Church ; and He, so far as by the help of reason and of Scripture, we can ascertain, uses the symbol of the Sacrament only as a symbol, to body forth to the eye the inscrut- able spiritual benefit bestowed, and not as of itself endued with, or possessing, any quickening power. * On this point, again, Dr. William Whitaker supplies us with some accurate distinctions : " Sacramenta efficere gratiam ut media et instru- menta suo modo non negamus, sed quia illi (i.e., Pontificii) gratiam ad sacramenta alligant, et in sacramentis includunt, sic ut per se gratiam afferant, non possumus probare. Neque enim instituta in eum finem sacramenta sunt, ut gratiam infundant ex natura sua et per se, aut ut in se vim arcanam sanctificandi habebant perpetuo insitam, ut illi volunt, sic ut, licet non credas promissionibus, tamen sacramenta faciant ut credas, et te justificent. Nos vero sacramenta instituta esse dicimus, non ut fidem infundant, sed ut fidem antea infusam confirment in promissionibus, easdemque promissiones nobis obsignent ; et vim sacramentorum earn esse dicimus ut iis, qui non credunt pro- missionibus, nullam gratiam sacramenta conferant, iis vero qui credurit maximam." (Prcelectiones de Sacramentis^. 7.) SYMBOLISM. SYMBOLISM. ESTHETICS have grown greatly into favour in this age of revived ecclesiastical taste. It is the more necessary, therefore, to inquire into their effects, to ascertain, if possible, whether they rest upon a pure religious basis, and whether the law of their influence is such as to promote a robust and healthy, or only a feeble parasitical piety. It is an acknowledgment which has been made by one of the most distinguished writers of the present day on religious Art,* that this is a question of great importance, and one which remains as yet " entirely unanswered." An inquiry " dogged, merciless, and fearless" into this subject is what, he says, he earn- estly desires to see instituted. It may look like pre- sumption in us to attempt to discuss so difficult a question ; it would doubtless appear more modest to leave it untouched for others, who may be better capable of penetrating into its subtle depths, and tracing the occult influences of this science of signs : but in the absence of any criteria or guiding princi- ples supplied by others to enable men to form any decisive opinion one way or the other, we would humbly endeavour to furnish them with some con- * John Ruskin. 124 SYMBOLISM. siderations which may help them in determining whether Symbolism is an aid or no to the actings of true religion. " There are, it seems to me," Mr. Ruskin says, " three distinct questions to be considered : the first, what has been the effect of external splendour on the genuineness and earnestness of Christian worship ? The second, what the use of pictorial or sculptural representation in the communication of Christian historical knowledge or excitement of affectionate imagination? The third, what the influence of the practice of religious art on the life of the artist ?" (Note 2 at the end of the Seven Lamps.) The last of these is a question that lies quite out of our line ; into this, therefore, we shall not enter ; but to the two former, which we may conveniently condense into one under the general inquiry, How far Symbolism, or the use of visible emblems and aids to devotion, is consistent with the spirituality and truth, and conducive to the ends of Christian worship, we hope to be able to supply some answer. Symbolism has been defined to be, " the having something in common with another by representative quality:" or, to take Mr. Ruskin's own definition, "it is the setting forth of a great truth by an im- perfect and inferior sign." Whichever of these defi- nitions we take, it is evidently supposed that there is a real analogy or correspondence, if not in nature, at least in some particular property or feature between the sign used and the thing signified. And what we SYMBOLISM. 125 have to ascertain is, whether there be anything by representative quality between the spiritual verities of religion and the symbols usually adopted to set them forth ; and also what is the real nature of the influ- ence which they exert upon the worship which we seek to render to the Most High.* The basis of all true worship, it will be admitted, is to be found in that sublime " announcement made by the Great Teacher of mankind to the woman of Samaria " God is a Spirit." This truth, simple as it is, had never been discovered by the philosophers of antiquity. It was new even, in this positive form, to the pages of Revelation. The Jews, in common with the Samaritans, though taught to regard Jehovah without any similitude, still imagined him to be local, or more to be worshipped in one place than in an- other. And as to the conceptions of the most acute among the Heathen, the very highest of them never went beyond imagining Deity to be the soul of the universe, which was a kind of spiritual Pantheism ; while the great mass of the people among them con- ceived of Him, and were in the habit of worshipping * There are many collateral considerations, cross-influences and questions, connected with this subject, into which it will be impossi- ble for us to enter within the compass of a limited essay. All that we can do here is to lay down certain broad indisputable principles, without staying to inquire how they have been or may be modified, BO as to be guarded against abuse by other influences. Should, however, this, our first attempt to fathom a difficult question meet with accept- ance, we may, perhaps, at some future day endeavour to follow it out in all its bearings and relation?, corroborating our arguments by historic facts. 126 SYMBOLISM. Him, under the grossest bodily shapes and represen- tations. But Christ swept away the false conceptions of the one, and corrected the mistaken notions of the others, by the vivid and decisive declaration " God is a Spirit ; and they that worship him must wor- ship him in spirit and in truth." There is something in this assertion, " God is a Spirit," that purifies while it expands to a boundless degree all our conceptions of the Great Supreme. It separates Deity at once from all connection with whatever is gross or degrading in the ideal, by separ- ating him from all that is corruptible, local, seen, limited, material, and perishable. It scatters into nothingness all notions of time, place, form, figure, or possible created similitude in relation to Him, and, by necessary consequence, all the accidents and elements of imperfection, elevating Him to an infinite and eternal distance above all visible things, his only temple the universe the only altar where he is worshipped, the inmost recess of the human soul the only shrine in which he dwells, his own glorious perfections. The nature of the Object of worship must neces- sarily determine the mode and kind of worship that is to be rendered to him. Men of science know full well, that if they would not be deceived in their theories they must make them consistent with facts. It is thus we must proceed if we would not err in our theorising in the matter of theology. We must seek to obtain true notions of the nature of God, SYMBOLISM. 127 of his peculiar perfections, which are the constituent elements of his glorious character, the right know- ledge of which is the grand pre-requisite to all suitable and acceptable worship. What, then, are the pro- perties of God, considered simply as a Spirit ? It is only by going back to first principles in regard to the Deity, getting them clearly recognised by the mind, and admitted as data, that we can resolve the ques- tion, " What is the true nature of religious worship," or guard ourselves against the admission of elements which go to vitiate its whole character. Now spirit, it may be observed, is distinguished from matter by these properties, power, invisibility, and incapability of being made to assume any particular shape or figure. First, power is the property of spirit. It is a vulgar mistake to suppose that matter, as such, possesses any power. It has not the power even to put itself in motion. Wherever there is motion, or active life, there spirit in some form or other is the mighty agent that produces it. God, as the Great Eternal Spirit, is the prime original mover of all things, the cause of all causes, the life of all life ; and the effects which we witness around us in the world are but the signs, the passing shadows of his hidden and mysterious power. And it is not only matter he con- trols, but mind, only with this difference in the mode (which is a point not to be overlooked), that he acts on matter intermediately through matter, and on mind through mind. No evidence or proof of any 128 SYMBOLISM. kind can be adduced to show that the Divine Ruler ever violates this law of action, or confuses material and moral laws one with another, in their operation in producing their distinctive effects. If discrepant cases seem to arise, or effects are wrought which appear to be of a spiritual kind, and. yet are traceable to material agencies, it must be that man's powers, being perverted, work backwards where they ought to work forwards, or that there is some latent decep- tion in the whole process. For it is so certain, that we may lay it down as an axiom, that the effect of matter on mind is only, always, and invariably to deaden the effect of mind on matter to quicken. Another property of spirit is invisibility. It is as a pure Spirit that the. Lord is the " invisible God" Spirit, even in the common acceptation of the word, is a thing that cannot be seen it is too subtle to be the object of vision. But invisibility necessarily belongs to Him who is infinite. Were it possible for him to be the object of sight, he must be limited and local, and by necessary consequences could not be infinite. But infinite he must be in order to be God, and to govern all things. As being infinite, he can- not be pictured to the human eye under any form, nor figured out according to his true nature by any act or skill of man, as the apostle justly argued in his sublime discourse to the Athenians. It is a further property of spirit, then, or rather consequence of its nature, that it is incapable of being made to assume any definite visible shape or figure. This is true of SYMBOLISM. 129 all spirit as spirit, and especially of the great Infinite Spirit. From considering what are the properties of spirit in general, let us proceed to notice those which are pecu- liar to God as God or the infinite Eternal Spirit, the source of all power, the Creator and Preserver of all other spirits or as he is emphatically denominated in the scriptures, " the Father of spirits." As such, the following things may be predicated of him, that he is necessarily eternal, immaterial, omnipresent, and pos- sessed of infinite wisdom and intelligence, himself filing all things, yet distinct from them, and confined to no place. 1 . He is eternal, and the alone eternal. Matter cannot be eternal, for matter is continually under- going change, whereas that which exists from all eternity must be absolutely unchangeable. It must exist of itself, and continue for ever to exist by a law of necessity, incapable of annihilation by any power whatever; which obviously is not the property of matter. Besides matter is perfectly passive, and could not of itself give the varied forms of beautiful life, and still less create the intelligent agents which we behold in the world around us. Reason and understanding, we know, exist in certain creatures. And since they could not arise out of nothing, nor can be produced by any combination of material elements within created power, they must have had an intelli- gent author. Intelligence and understanding can no more arise out of what had none, than matter could J 130 SYMBOLISM. spring from nothing. It is spirit that thinks. It is spirit that gives life and intelligence. Nothing but spirit, then, could have existed from eternity. The reason why God must necessarily be an im- material Being is, that the powers of thought and of moral intelligence are the attributes of mind and not of matter, and must necessarily have existed before matter, in order to give existence and form to matter. They cannot belong to what is material ; for whatever is material is divisible into an indefinite number of parts, and what properties belonged to the whole would attach to all the parts, and thus there might be, not one God, but many. But God is one, and can be but one, because he is eternal. It is equally certain, we may remark, that that which has existed from eternity can be only good. To suppose that that spiritual evil which we find in the world has existed from the beginning is palpably absurd : for " spiritual evil is a deviation from a given rule ;" and both the rule, and the giver of it, must have existed before the deviation. That which exists from eternity is alone subject to no rule ; it is a law to itself; it exists quite independently of our con- ceptions, retaining through all changes its own unchangeable nature. Omnipresence is another property of God as a Spirit. To give life to all things, and to govern all things, he- must necessarily be present with all things. As our souls must be present in our bodies to animate and govern them, so God must be present in every SYMBOLISM. 131 part of the animated universe filling all space, penetrating all substances, pervading all minds, in order that they may be upheld, animated, directed. As an omnipresent and an intelligent Spirit, he would seem necessarily also to be omniscient. All the perfections of God, indeed, are coequal as they are co- existent. As where our minds are, we are for the moment; so as God is all mind, there is no place where he is not to observe, to see, to know. He is privy to all purposes. He is present in all times as well as in all places. Eternity is his habitation ; time and place are only the standing points, the platform, from which we survey his mighty ongoing operations. He is round about us on every side, within us, and judges of us not by our outward actions, but by our inmost thoughts. There is no escaping from his scrutiny ; he looks through us with his penetrating glance ; his eye follows us wheresoever we go. Hence those words of the Psalmist : " Whither shall I flee from thy Spirit, or whither shall I go from thy pre- sence ?" In God we live and move and have our being. He is also in everything around us. All nature is full of God. And yet we must not confound him with his works : this would be Pantheism. He is distinct from them as mind is distinct from matter as distinct from them as we are personally distinct from the things around us upon which we operate. Distinct personal existence is the necessary property of mind. As our soul can be present in the body without destroying any of its properties, so God, as a pure J 2 132 SYMBOLISM. Spirit, and infinite, can be present in the same place with all material substances without displacing or destroying any of their properties. Wherever he is present (and that is everywhere), it is in real power, and in all his plenitude. But see him, hear him, feel him, take measure of him, we cannot. His manner of existence, how he can be in all things, and yet distinct from them, everywhere present, and yet, pro- perly speaking, in no place, is a mystery that goes altogether beyond our comprehension. The question, then, here presses upon us, " How can we worship such a Being ; a Being without any definite form or figure, and having no local habi- tation ?" Is it possible for us to realise his presence and approach him, without some visible medium, some material or symbolic representation to bring him sensibly before us ? Are not such aids absolutely necessary to creatures constituted as we are ? The statement of our Lord frowns back the idea : " God is a Spirit ; and they that worship him must worship in spirit and in truth." We must endeavour, therefore, it would seem, to discover some other method whereby the conditions of this great primary dogmatic truth may be fulfilled without recourse had to any material or symbolic aids. We must be prepared to show that there are other means by which, without at all infringing upon the pure spirituality of his nature, we may contem- plate and worship God. Where is the seat of devotion ? Undoubtedly it SYMBOLISM. 133 is the inmost soul ; and by the emotions of the soul alone can all its acts be carried on, without the aid of any sensible objects. The mental faculty or power whereby we judge and discern moral truths is not itself material ; and so far from finding help from outward material things, it is obliged to withdraw itself from all bodily operations, and infold itself within itself whenever it would nakedly behold truth. The brightest image of God is to be found in the consti- tution of the human soul. That is the only glass at least in which it can be clearly reflected. Material and sensible objects in their very nature are contradictory to the Divine, and do but darken and obscure his image ; but the soul, in its essence and qualities, is, so to speak, congenerous with Deity, and endowed with the same properties. Hence it is into the breast -plate of our own souls we must look, if we would behold the true Urim andThummim in which we may read the glowing ? mystic characters of the Divine nature and will, and hold direct converse with the invisible Eternal Spirit. God, it has been justly remarked, "could write his own name, so that it might be read, only in rational natures." The material objects of the exterior and sensible world bear at the most only the footprints of Deity. In the soul of man we behold as in a mirror his very face. Hence it was that Plato, seeing into things with a purer vision than the other men of his age, often reproved them for their resort to pictures and images to put them in mind of the eot, and exhorted them to look rather 134 SYMBOLISM. into their own souls for the knowledge of God, the seat of his dwelling, and the shrine of his worship, telling them that God had so copied himself into the faculties and energies and moral qualities of man's soul, that the lovely characters of divinity might be seen and read there of all men to the very life. It needs only to be duly reflected on in order to be perceived, that all material signs and visible emblems must utterly fail even to image forth the things that pertain to God as a Spirit. God is without beginning ; but all material things had a begin- ning.* He is the living God, but they are dead; and how can anything which is lifeless be a fit symbol to represent the Everliving? A spirit has power ; but material things, as we have already remarked, have no power. A spirit is necessarily invisible, and cannot be represented substantively ; a spirit is shapeless, and cannot be shaped forth in any kind of figure ; but all material and visible objects have form and figure. God, as the Father of spirits, is eternal, self-originated, immaterial, immuta- ble, omnipresent, and everlasting, and under what pos- sible sensible images can any one paint or represent these purely abstract ideas? Everything material is * This is the meaning of those somewhat obscurely translated words, " For all those thing's" (the materials with which you are build- ing a house to my name) " hath mine hand made, and all those things have been (more properly have had a beginning to be) saith the Lord," in Isaiah Ixvi. 2. There could not be a more sublime reproof than this whole passage, of that littleness of conception in regard to the Deity, which leads men to suppose that they can build temples, as they ex- press it, " worthy of God." SYMBOLISM. necessarily limited and local ; but God' no place, dwelling in his own immensity. Even this glorious world which he has made, but very faintly shadows forth his perfections. The soft upshooting light from behind the everlasting mountains, when the sun has just set, though it carries away our imagination into boundlessness by having no definable border, and seeming to tell of bright regions lying away and away without limit, gives us but a shadowy, though the best sensible idea, perhaps, of his infinity. The only means through which we can know God is by his attributes : his essence is inscrutable. Those attributes are displayed in his works and ways, his acts and doings. But still they are objects of contemplation only to the mind ; and it is by the mind alone, or the moral intelligence within us, they can be understood as attributes of the Deity, so as to convey to us, when combined, like the prismatic colours in the sun, a mental image of his pure spiritual brightness. The difference between Theology and Religion lies chiefly in this, that Theology furnishes us with right notions of those attributes as constituting the cha- racter, name, or personality, of the Being who is to be worshipped : Religion consists in their felt relation to ourselves with corresponding actions. Spiritual devotion needs no place for its actings, for it never finds itself out of the infinite sphere of the divinity ; but wherever it beholds beauty, law, harmony, goodness, love, wisdom, holiness, justice, truth, there it 136 SYMBOLISM. finds some line and trace of God, and by means of these perfections it mounts up as by a ladder of sun- beams to the invisible dwelling-place of Deity. Nothing* can be more self-evident than that the worship which shall give to God the honour due to his name must be like God in its nature : in other words, it must be purely spiritual. The external manifestations of it are for the benefit of our fellow - men : the essential character of it must have respect to God. The homage we render to a king must be visible, because he is visible; but it must also be suited to the dignity of the king, or it would be re- garded as an insult. The Infinite Supreme cannot allow himself, because of his unchangeable perfections, to be viewed or treated in any way that is unworthy or inconsistent with his character and true nature. It is on the ground that God is a Spirit that our Lord affirms, "they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth" * To worship him in spirit * It is a point of some moment to the determination of the ques-^ tion now before us, What is the true force and meaning 1 of these words? Mr. Ruskin, in his second volume of the Stones of Venice, makes the following extraordinary observation upon this remark of our Lord's : " Observe Christ's own words on this head : ' GOD is a spirit, and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.' The wor- shipping in spirit comes first, and it does not necessarily imply the worshipping- in truth." What a strange assertion to come from a man of so much sense ! What could have called it forth ! Sadder even is the occasion of its being made, than the misinterpretation it is put forth as a sort of apology for Madonna worship ! But the falseness of the distinction here attempted to be drawn between different kinds of worshippers may be easily made manifest. Our Lord asserts two things to be necessary to the worshipping of God as a Spirit. Mr. Ruskin says that both of these are not absolutely necessary, but that the one will SYMBOLISM. 137 undoubtedly means to worship him in the inner shrine of the soul, with pure, spiritual thoughts and emotions, and not as dwelling in place : to worship him in truth, as undoubtedly means to worship him without any of those material symbols and representa- tions which, from their very nature, viewed in relation to Him, are opposed to truth. The only things, then, on which we are allowed to fix our gaze (and this must be by the mind's eye) are those bright, eternal perfections of God through which alone we can know him, and which constitute his true, essential beauty. Ideas of GOD are what we are allowed to form, but not, strictly speaking, conceptions. We are to con- template him as he exists in his pure spirituality, and not to aim to give him in our thoughts any form of objectivity. It may be objected to this view of the matter, that the process is too abstract ; that it is impossible for us to apprehend God as a pure Spirit ; that to attempt to do so is to send our thoughts forth to float in a region of boundless vacuity, where they can find no resting- suffice when the other is wanting 1 . To illustrate the absurdity of this, just suppose the statement to be To build a church you must have stone and cement : Who would think of interpreting this to mean, only that the cement was very desirable, but not as necessarily included as the stone. Or again, canvass and colour together make a picture. The canvass is absolutely necessary, but this statement does not necessarily imply the presence of the colour! The fact is, our Lord's words here are a hendiadys, and used to describe what he means by the "true worship- pers" The " true worshippers" according to him, are those who " worship the Father in spirit and in truth," and others are no wor- shippers of God at all, but only of the idols of their own imaginations ; or, as he had just said, of they " know not what." 138 SYMBOLISM, place ; that from the very constitution of our nature we must body forth the Deity to our conceptions under some shape or form, to realise his existence at all. But this is shallow thinking. Take, for example, the human soul, which is a spirit. Is it necessary to conceive of this under any bodily shape or form in order to make it the subject of our medi- tative contemplation ? Can we not regard it simply as moral intelligence, existing abstractly, and reflect upon its wonderful properties as such, just as we can con- ceive of rectitude from our innate idea of the thing, without actually drawing a straight line to represent it? Our arguments hitherto have applied only to pure Theism ; and so far, we suppose, they will be ad- mitted to be valid. But there is another view of the question, which is, How far Symbolism stands in an authorised relation to the great facts and doctrines and Divine Author of Christianity ? Here, it may be thought, it finds a normal sanction, inasmuch as " the second commandment is, in the letter, utterly done away with, by the fact of the Incarnation." Such is the bold statement which has been advanced by no mean authority (the late Dr. Arnold). It becomes the more necessary, therefore, that we should weigh care- fully all that can be adduced in support of Symbolism* * The symbolism which we are here discussing 1 is not, it will be observed, that verbal symbolism which consists in the use of meta- phors and figures of speech; but the embodied symbolism of sculptured or pictorial representation. SYMBOLISM. 139 as a supposed legitimate aid to devotion under the Christian economy. First, it has been argued that " God has sanctioned one conceivable similitude of himself, when he de- clared himself in the person of Christ." (Idem.} The passages of Scripture which have been supposed to warrant this conclusion are such as those in which he is declared to be "the image of the invisible God" "the express image of his person;" and Christ's own words to Philip, " he that hath seen me hath seen the Father." But in this view of these ex- pressions it is not difficult to detect a fallacy of conception resting upon a false interpretation. These statements cannot possibly refer to the visible or bodily nature of Christ (and it is only in that nature he can be depicted) ; for in that there was nothing out- wardly distinctive from the nature of other human beings, except indeed that "his visage was more marred than any man's, and his form than the sons of men." It would manifestly be profane to imagine that this was expressive of Deity. It must have been rather in his acts in those moral qualities and divine perfections of character which he displayed that he was the image of the invisible God; and that he who had seen the Son had seen the Father. This, Jesus himself has explained to have been his meaning by declaring that the words which he spake, and the works which he performed, were not done by himself (that is, as man), but "by the Father that dwelt in him" (John xiv. 10). If those words and 140 SYMBOLISM. works, or rather the principles from which they sprang, can be depicted to the natural eye, or em- bodied in any material form, then may a fitting symbol be invented to represent Incarnate Deity. This disposes of the shallow observation made by Dr. Arnold, and of all observations of the like kind. The most that lies within the power of art is to produce the figure of a man, drawn, if you please, after the most perfect type, and then, by an arbitrary association of ideas, to call this figure " Christ." But it can body forth, however life-like, nothing, above what is human, unless it is in the power of the human to produce what is divine. Whether it be a living Christ or a dead Christ that is intended to be repre- sented, you can make no observable distinction between him and any other man under the like circumstances, but by some artifice of art (such as the nimbus around his head), and not in truth. The crayon touches of fiction must be brought in to give even an ideal dis- tinction to your figure. And even these will prove deficient. For let it be a dying Christ you wish to depict. Your pencil may portray his sufferings in their visible effects, but it cannot portray the invisible causes of them. It may portray the accursed tree, but not the curse of the law there borne. It may portray Christ bearing the cross to Calvary, but not Christ bearing the sins of many. You may depict the nails piercing his sacred, sinless flesh, but who can depict eternal justice piercing both flesh and spirit ? You may trace the form of the soldier's spear, but not the soul-strokes SYMBOLISM. 141 of a sin-hating God the cup of vinegar put to his mouth, but not the cup of wrath which he drank to the lowest dregs the derision of the Jews, but not the desertion of the Almighty. You may describe the blood issuing from his body, but not the waters of life streaming from his Divinity, pouring out oceans of spiritual and eternal blessings. You may paint the crown of thorns, but not the crown of glory he purchased.* Still less can you portray the living virtues of the Redeemer, the inward excellences from which flowed all the virtue of his acts that divine benignity which glowed in his bosom the wonderful gentleness and compassion sustained by conscious power and authority, which characterised his whole demeanour. All these things, and many others of the like kind, can be contemplated aright only as the sub- jects of a sanctified imagination, or through the spiritual perceptions of faith; and to attempt to embody them in material symbols, is but to sub- stitute eyes of stone for eyes of flesh, and to seek the living among the dead. The fact of his birth, or of his death, you may indeed, by this means, bring to mind ; but by no such means can you teach the doctrine which either of those facts involves. One great end, it would appear from Scripture, for which Christ became incarnate and died, was to manifest the exceeding great love of God towards mankind his mercy towards the guilty a thing * For these observations I am indebted to Maclaurin's celebrated sermon on " Glorying in the Cross of Christ." 1 42 SYMBOLISM. which could not be learned from his operations in nature. But this unspeakable love is what no pencil of the painter can portray it can be conceived of only by the mind, and is to be learned from the Redeemer's acts, not from his bodily form. For the purpose of teaching, then, or even for the excitement of the highest and purest form of affection , as distin- guished from mere animal tenderness, such religious aids as images or pictures of Christ are obviously powerless. Your carved or painted figure is dead, and as dead, it cannot speak with a living pow r er : it possesses not one single thing in common with Divinity; and, therefore, as a representation of him "in whom was life" it can be no true symbol to convey true notions of the Godhead, even as it dwelt in Christ bodily. Whether it be lawful to make use of any such representations of the God-man Christ Jesus in our religious worship is another question. But if it be, and if images and pictures of Christ were intended to be a medium for instructing us in the divine character, or of exciting our devout affections, it is surely a most unaccountable circumstance that there should have been no print of him struck off no true likeness taken, and handed down, under apostolic authority, as an heirloom to the Church. We might have ex- pected, upon this hypothesis, that there would have been one exact resemblance sketched, and most care- fully preserved by divine ordainment ; true copies of which the Church should have the privilege of fur- nishing to all her worshippers. But even the Romish SYMBOLISM. 143 Church, with all her audacity in idolatry, has never pretended to such a possession, except her pseudo- print upon a pocket-handkerchief ! * It is a fact by no means to be forgotten in the discussion of this question, that God has withdrawn Christ altogether from our view. Surely there must be some reason for this surely this must have some end ? If we inquire from Scripture what that end is, we learn that it was with the very purpose of obliging us to believe on him without beholding him with the bodily eye. It is an infringement, indeed, upon the great law of faith to presume to depict him now to the sight. Thomas believed because he had seen : more blessed is he who believes without seeing. Great as are the advantages in many respects of being able to fix our eyes upon the object, or even upon a picture of the object of our affections, or of any person upon whom we are depending for benefits, a little consideration will show that in our religious regards it is far better that we should not be able to o fasten our gaze on the object whom we desire to love and adore. Sublime greatness, by an inevitable law of human feeling, becomes invested with the attribute of little- ness, and its impression on the mind is consequently diminished, the instant it is presented to us under a * Respecting the Sudarium shown by the Romanists, of which it may be remarked there are six rival ones, the learned Romish doctors solve the difficulty by saying that the handkerchief applied to our Lord's face consisted of several* folds, consequently the impression of the countenance went through them all, and they are all genuine ! 144 SYMBOLISM. definite, conceivable, precisely outlined form. If the Divine Redeemer, then, be presented to us con- tinually under the aspect of a mere pictured man, it necessarily restricts, limits, and narrows our con- ception of Him. Our view is hereby drawn and confined down to a precise image of human person- alityan individual graphical form sending forth no rays of divinity is placed before us and to that form our contemplations are, by the direct and obstinate power of the senses, restricted. Thus our ideas of him become all darkened. It is the mere human quality of the being we behold, with all its accidents of mortal condition, that fastens most strongly on our minds, and it becomes next to impossible for the thoughts to clothe that Being with any of the glory of a super- human majesty. There is no scope left for the ele- vating actings of the imagination ; it cannot expand itself into splendid ideal conception, as it can upon a Being who is contemplated as glorious only through his recorded wonderful works and excellences. Thus it appears that there is a positive loss, in the use of a sensible image to bring Christ before us, of all those diviner elements of his Being which excite the sublimest kind of affection. There was a constant tendency in the minds of the apostles to view their Lord through the humili- ating accidents of his humanity, and to lose sight of his divine but hidden glory. To keep this in check seems to have been the chief reason why he wrought some of his particular and most god-like miracles- such as quelling the tempest on the sea. And to SYMBOLISM. 145 correct this tendency so as to prevent their entertain- ing low ideas of Him, was probably the proximate design of the Transfiguration a scene which no human pencil, though dipped in the colours of heaven, can adequately portray. Great, then, as we may imagine would be the advantages of being able to fix the sight upon some visible representation of the object whom we adore, there are manifestly greater in leaving the conceptions free ; for the mind can then array the Lord Christ in every glory which speculation, imagination, adoring reverence, can combine, in an ideal of the magnificence of the exalted Mediator. And this mode of conceiving of him, we may remark, was clearly intended, because all the Scrip- ture descriptions of him in his exaltation (we might specify in particular the visions of St. John) are of the most transcendent and unearthly kind. It is quite a mistake to suppose that we cannot give as intense and glowing an affection and admira- tion to an unseen but admired object, as to a seen. We know by experience that it is perfectly possible to view beings whom our eyes never have fastened upon, even in picture, with the most animated interest and satisfaction. Who needs the picture or statue of a Howard to convey to his mind a vivid con- ception of that noble self-sacrificing philanthropist? or of a Wilberforce, to give him an enlarged idea of the mental magnitude of that eloquent advocate for the emancipation of the slave ? K 146 SYMBOLISM. If it had been the divine intention that Christ should be worshipped as a visible object, or through the form and figure of a man set before our eyes ; or had this mode of drawing near to him been condu- cive to the purity and earnestness of Christian wor- ship, then what we might reasonably have anticipated would be, not that he should have been withdrawn from our sight, but rather that he would have been elevated in visible glory in the heavens, where all his true servants, being gifted with the special kind of vision which was bestowed on Elisha's servant, might behold him, and pay to him the adorations of their admiring homage. But no such economy, nor anything approaching to it, is that established under the New Testament: on the contrary, "if any man be in Christ Jesus he is a new creature ; " " and though we have known Christ after the flesk, yet now henceforth know we him (i. e., after this manner) no more." (2 Cor. v. 16.) The great lesson which it seems to have been in- tended we should be taught by this economy is, that God requires us to walk on in the dark towards the heavenly Canaan as he did Abraham, in the exercise of a brave, unquestioning, trustful faith, with no one to go before us, and no light to guide us, but his direct- ing voice taking him simply at his word, seeing, as faith will enable us to see, " Him who is invisible," and following, where he leads the way, with un- faltering step. It is a point which we must by no means fail to SYMBOLISM. 147 notice, in our endeavours to judge of the lawfulness and suitability of visible symbols to body forth our Divine unseen Saviour as an object of worship, that it is only his human nature that can be represented in picture, and it is not in his human nature, but in his divine, that he is to be the object of our worship. His human nature is the medium only of mediation. He took that for the purpose of suffering death, of entering into the presence of God as our High Priest, and of finally judging us as man. By worshipping him represen- tatively under the accidents of his bodily form, we do in fact worship that part of him which was created, rather than that which was divine. But waiving this* he has now a " glorified " body, which cannot possibly be portrayed, for that is what no eye hath seen. This glorified body is, too, a "spiritual" body, and as being spiritual it is contradictory to its very nature to represent it as material. It is by its very condition invisible,* in- vested with inconceivable splendours, exalted far above all heavens, and by its conjunction with Deity fills all things. What an indignity then, and a de- gradation, is done to him to represent him still, when we would worship him, as he appeared in the days of his humiliation. How obvious is it that the effect of this must be to lower and degrade him, rather than to elevate and improve us. It just reverses, in- deed, what appears to have been the Divine intention ; for instead of making his humanity the means of * The reader would do well to refer to 1 Tim. i. 17 and 1 Tim. vi. 14, 15, 16, in connection with these statements of ours. K 2 148 SYMBOLISM. exalting us to Divinity, it brings down, and keeps down, Divinity to the level of our poor debased humanity. Conclusive beyond all question as these arguments seem to be against the use of pictures and images of the person of Christ in Divine worship, the same objection, it may be thought, does not lie against the agnus Dei as a symbol of him* because Christ is spoken of by St. John as appearing in the form of a Lamb slain even in heaven. In thus representing him, however, in a material image, it is to be ob- served that we are stereotyping as literal that which was obviously intended to be understood figuratively. The term, " the Lamb," is a well known appellation for the Messiah and when John the Baptist pointed him out to his disciples under the expression, " Be- hold the Lamb of God," we should hardly think they looked to see the literal form of a lamb. When the term only is used, the mind immediately transfers the idea to the man Christ Jesus suffering for the sins of the world ; but when the actual form of a lamb is presented as an object for sensible observation, it is the creature rather than the doctrine upon which the mind fastens, and the figurative semblance becomes per- petuated rather than the reality. If this emblem of Christ cannot be justified, when put before us in a * The Council of Constantinople, held in 692 ? positively prohibited the use of this symbol, and commanded to be substituted for it the human figure of our Saviour. The object of this was to put history in the place of Symbolism, SYMBOLISM. 149 substantive material form, still less can such obscure ones as the pelican and the fish. The only plausible reason that we can conceive of, as what might be urged in favour of the fantastic figure of a lamb carrying a cross (the common mode of sculpturing this emblem), would be, that it was only a symbolic form of setting forth a fact ; but it cannot be doubted, that it is generally looked upon as re- presentative of the Pwson of the Saviour, and an aid in the worship of Him, in which view, like the golden calf, it must be an idol. But symbolism once admitted, does not stay even where it might seem to have Scrip- ture sanction, it has indulged in unlimited phanta- sies. Hence, even the griffin (0 nefandum !) has been employed as a symbol to denote " the union of the divine and human natures in the person of Christ ;" and how can this be defended ? There is another symbol used, and very common in our churches, for the Third Person of the ever blessed Trinity, which we shall be expected not to pass by unnoticed. The figure of a Dove, descend- ing amidst painted rays of glory, is an emblem of the Holy Ghost, which seems at first sight to have a direct Divine sanction, because it was in " a bodily shape like a dove " aupariKy &, (Luke iii. 22), he descended upon Christ at his baptism. But even in regard to this it may be doubted whether we have not taken the liberty of converting a mere visible sign to certify to a fact into a standing idol in violation of the letter, if not of the spirit, of the second command- 150 SYMBOLISM. ment.* For the Scripture does not say that the Holy Ghost descended and lighted upon Christ in the actual bodily form of a dove, but only "like a dove;" that is, like a dove as to his manner of descending, first hovering over and then settling. These words do not express or define the bodily shape in which the Divine Spirit appeared, but only, at the most, the general outline of the appearance which indicated his presence.f It was similar probably to the lambent flames or tongues of fire, so called, of which we read * u It is an instructive fact that in none of the monuments of the early Christians in the Catacombs at Rome, is there to be seen any representation of the Godhead, as is now so common in the Komish churches, under the figures of an old man, a young man, and a dove. The same statement is true with regard to the Crucifixion. Not a single attempt to portray it is to be seen in any of these ancient monuments. The lofty faith of the primitive Christians dwelt so much upon the Divinity of our Lord, that they shrank in reverence from the idea of coarsely representing- the mere corporeal pangs which weighed him down in the hour of his mortal agony. But at length, under the growing influence of a carnalising faith, subjects which at first they regarded with so sacred an awe that they scarcely dared to comment upon them in words, lost their divine idealism, and were coarsely shadowed forth by sensible objects." Kip's Christmas Holi- days at Home. This is confirmed also by the confession of a French writer, M. Didron, Icon, de Dieu, who sajs, p. 204 : u II faut le dire enfin les premiers Chretiens jusqu'aux cinquieme et sixieme siecles furent assez mal-disposes pour les images en general; tous etaient iconoclastes, ceux-ci un peu plus, et ceux-la un peu moins." f Whitby, in Luke iii. 22, correctly observes, that if the - N r SYMBOLISM. X&Tl ^?> ^f# regards all our deeper religious emotions, the naturally " seeks for fancies, types, and dim simili- tudes," wherein to embody its conceptions, and even " extracts from them consolation and strength." But what we deny is, that the similitude, when wrought into a material form, and presented to the eye of another, can excite or give birth to the same pure religious feeling as that from which itself perhaps originally sprang. For if this were so, then would the handi- works of man produce that pure spiritual effect which the Scriptures everywhere trace to God, reversing that decisive and deeply philosophic statement made by our Lord, " That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." The difference of the effect (to avail ourselves of an exquisite illustration from Cudworth's Sermon, " on Keeping Christ's Commandments") between the devotion that is produced by the external agencies of a so-called religious Symbolism, appealing to the senses, and that produced by the action of the Spirit of God from within, is, that in the one case, men are " like dead instruments of music, that sound sweetly and harmoniously when they are only struck and played upon from without by the musician's hand ;" but in the other, " it is as if the soul of music had incorporated itself with the instrument, and lived in the strings, and made them of their own accord, without any touch or impulse from without, dance up and down and warble out their harmonies." 172 SYMBOLISM. It is the foregoing statement of our Lord's which directs us to the true producing cause of all pure spiritual worship. Symbolic images, when put in the form of material figures, act immediately upon the outward senses ; and by acting upon them, they only excite and enflame the natural feelings. This is the influence ascribed to them by the Pro- phet, when he accuses the worshippers of images of " enflaming themselves with idols under every green tree." (Isaiah Ivii. 5.) To the eye of the ardent devotee the cold rigid features of the statue may dimple and smile, but this fancied effect has its origin in the mind of the devotee himself, and springs from the source of that fond feeling which is the very essence of idolatry. The impressions of these outward objects cannot be conveyed at the furthest beyond the "natural mind." They reach not to the spirit, or that inner moral sense which is the seat and source of all genuine religion. Pure spiritual devotion emanates from the soul within, and can neither be produced nor strengthened by any inanimate material agencies from without. It is the originated effect of the regenerating and indwelling influence of the Holy Ghost, inspiring man with the spirit of devoutness towards the Father of spirits. As a man must first receive the light of the sun into his eye, and have the form of it imprinted on the retina, in order to see the sun, so must our souls first be made godlike in order to see God, so as to worship him in spirit and in truth. Our own rectified moral perceptions, then, are the true SYMBOLISM. 173 medium of all spiritual apprehensions and intercourses of the soul with God. It is thus the sun is seen by its own image reflected in the waters. It is sometimes urged, that the analogies of things natural with things spiritual, supply at once a model and type, and also a warrant for art in resorting to its imitative Symbolism. It cannot be denied, that a great multitude of analogies with moral truths strike our imagination as we walk and muse through the scenes of nature. Almost every object, to a devout mind, seems to symbolise some spiritual truth. And no doubt it is a most profitable employment for the soul to pluck these blossoms of the tree of life that grows so hard by the tree of knowledge, and to treasure them up among its stores of instruction. The seeds they contain carry in them the principle of immor- tality. No one ever made more frequent or more apt use of natural objects to illustrate spiritual truths than our divine Lord ; and most vividly, in all the in- stances in which he has resorted to this method of teaching, do his exquisite parables set forth those truths. But whether this analogy of things heavenly with things earthly be a really existing fact, or merely a magic creation of the mind itself, to supply its own felt need of suitable verbal terms to body forth its more spiritual conceptions, is a question.* The Apostle John, who saw heaven only in vision, had its scenes represented to him under the forms of symbolic imagery ; but the Apostle Paul, who had * See Note B, on Analogy, in the Appendix. 174 SYMBOLISM. actually been caught up into heaven, heard " unspeak- able" things, which it was not in the power of man even by means of figures, to utter. Assuming that nature has infolded in her visible works an element of spiritual teaching, it is hence argued that man may superadd it to his artistic imitations. But in his works, it is to be observed, the correspondence is only of one earthly thing to another the heavenly element, assumed to be in the works of nature, is left out, and cannot, by any human power, be infused. Man is, we know, in a certain respect, the image of God; but no one could affirm that the painted figure of a man is in any respect, the image of God it is only the image of a man with that which made him like God, his MIND, wanting. Another argument frequently used is, that as man is a complex being, consisting of a body as well as a soul, there must be a provision made by religion for both parts of his nature external symbols for his external sense as well as truths internal for his inter- nal soul. Abstractions, it is said, are only for angels ; and man, while he is in the body, must be taught by forms. This is in a measure true ; but it fails as a proof of what it is intended to establish namely, that Symbolism can aid to elevate the mind in acts of spiritual devotion. For it involves a palpable moral contradiction to suppose that through our lower nature we are to be elevated in our higher ; the design of religion is through our higher nature to act upon us SYMBOLISM. 175 so as to elevate us above our lower ; and therefore, to this end all the modes of religions influence should be adapted. This end is most certainly not to be attained by an oppressive employment of material Symbolism. It is to the soul of man, and not to his bodily vision, the voice of Nature, and all figures of thought founded upon Nature, directly address themselves ; which gives them a manifest advantage over all mate- rial representations as direct means of spiritual influ- ence. " Earthly objects which take the eye naturally lead the thoughts to earthly things," is the unwitting confession dropped by one who would have Symbolism to become as much the mark of the present as it was of a former age. God, the great Master has told us, seeks now those to worship him who will worship him in spirit and in truth. Surely then, if we convert his house into a menagerie of Symbolism, by filling it with such figures as fishes, lambs, stags, peacocks, lions, griffins, pelicans, and doves, we may expect that he will come ere long with the fire of indignation in his face, and the scourge of vengeance in his hand, and say, "Take these things hence." Even of his Father's own house, which his disciples were dis- posed to view with ah idolatrous admiration, he had occasion to say, " Seest thou these great buildings ? There shall not be left one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down." There is a dangerous facility in the lapsed human mind to worship the work of its " own hands," in the 176 SYMBOLISM. supposed symbolic architecture of splendid temples, and tlie sculptured forms of carved images, and to fancy all the while that it is worshipping God. There cannot be a more complete condemnation of this kind of worship, nor indeed of the use of any material media in our approaches to the Deity, than that implied in this prophecy of Isaiah, " In that day shall a man look to his Maker, and his eyes shall have respect to the Holy One of Israel. And he shall not look to the altars, the work of his hands, neither shall respect that which his own fingers have made, either the groves, or the images." (Isaiah xvii. 8.) The power of a sensuous Symbolism to awaken religious emotions is always found to be a favourite principle with the worldly rather than the godly. Hence it is not uncommon to hear persons of this habit of mind speaking in almost terms of ecstacy of the emotions they have felt, and the devoutness that has come over them, and the heavenliness of their experienced feelings as they have trod the aisles of some magnificent cathedral, gazing upon its lofty groined roof and life-like sculpture, or listening to its pealing anthems. But if the loftiness of the roof, and the upward spring of the arch, and the pointed pinnacle, can elevate the mind to just conceptions of God or of heaven, or inspire the soul with the pure aspirations of a genuine devotion, then must those persons be most godly and devout who have been employed in constructing, or who live in the im- SYMBOLISM. 177 mediate vicinity of a cathedral church. We need not ask, Is it so ? * Upon this point Mr. Ruskin has furnished us with a very trenchant and decisive answer, the more remarkable as coming from such an admirer of fine architecture. " The German critics," he says (vol. i. "Stones of Venice," p. 146), " have ingeniously and falsely ascribed the system of aspiration, so called, to a devotional sentiment pervading the Northern Gothic. I entirely and boldly deny the whole theory. Our cathedrals were, for the most part, built by worldly * That deep mental analyst, the celebrated John Foster, records a circumstance which seems to throw light upon the real influence and tendency of these sensuous impressions from religious objects upon worldly minds. " While musing- upon a favourite design of travelling, a gentleman one day entered the cathedral at Worcester, in the time of service. Walking in the aisle arid listening to the organ, which affected him very sensibly, his wish to travel began to glow and swell in his mind into an overwhelming passion, which bore him irresist- ibly to a determination. He could not have felt more if he had seen an apparition, or heard a voice from the sky. Every idea on the subject seemed to present itself to his mind with a surprisingly vivid clearness and force, and he believes that from that moment nothing could have prevented his undertaking the enterprise, but the com- mencement of the war.*' From this Foster proceeds to argue (and we think justly), that the tendency even of these religious excitements, as they are supposed to be, is only powerfully to reinforce any passion which the mind is at the time indulging, or to which it is predisposed, and that they have no power of themselves to produce devotional feeling. A young man inclined to vicious pleasures, thus coming into a magnificent church, and listening to the thrilling strains of "sacred music," would feel his passion enflamed to intensity, and its object probably invested with such a glowing seductiveness as would lead him direct from the cathedral to the brothel. At all events, we know that this is no uncommon occurrence in Romish cities, where the reli- gious ceremonial is the most gorgeous and fascinating in all the exter- nals of sensuous excitement. M 178 SYMBOLISM. people, who loved the world, and would have gladly stayed in it for ever : whose best hope was the escaping hell, which they thought to do by building cathedrals, but who had very vague conceptions of heaven in general, and very feeble desires respecting their entrance therein; and the form of the spired cathedral has no more intentional reference to heaven, as distinguished from the flattened slope of the Greek pediment, than the steep gable of a Norman house has, as distinguished from the flat roof of a Syrian one. We may now, with ingenious pleasure, trace such symbolic characters in the form we may now use it with such definite meaning ; but we only pre- vent ourselves from all right understanding of history, by attributing such influence to these poetical sym- bolisms in the formation of a national style. The human race are, for the most part, not to be moved by such silken cords ; and the chances of damp in the cellar, or of loose tiles on the roof, have unhappily much more to do with the fashions of a man's house-building than his ideas of celestial happiness or angelic virtue." Again, the same author says: "We attach, in modern days, a kind of sacredness to the pointed arch and groined roof;" but "There is no sacredness in round arches nor in pointed; none in pinnacles nor in buttresses ; none in pillars nor in traceries. . . . They were never built in any separate, mystical, and religious style ; they were built in the manner that was common and familiar to everybody at the time." (P. 99.) If there be truth in this, the religious influence SYMBOLISM. 179 which some ascribe to church architecture and Sym- bolism must be wholly a fiction of men's own fancy. The experienced effect cannot be produced by the objects looked upon from without, so much as by the action of the mind from within. The whole question, then, turns upon whether this be not a morbid action of the religious mind, taking occasion to aggravate its own disease by feeding upon those material excitements for which it has an appetency, rather than upon that pure spiritual food which sus- tains the real inward life of the soul. Were there not certain agreeable emotions, more in unison with the "natural man" than the "spiritual," connected with the exercises of a pictorial piety, it seems im- possible to account for the fondness with which the lovers of the theatre and the concert have ever in- clined to this mode of worshipping God. The excessive delight of the world in the Fine Arts, christened with the name of " Christian Arts," when employed in the service of religion (a delight revived of late years, and growing stronger every day), probably has its origin in that Ideal Idolatry which many have no hesitation in indulging, who would shrink with horror from literal idolatry.* And the fear is, that this, if unchecked, will, as it has done before, in former ages, end in actual idolatry. The pleasurable emotions, the positive fascination, which people experience when contemplating a life-like * For Note on Mr. Ruskin's " proper sense of the word Idolatry," see Appendix C, at the end. M 2 i 180 SYMBOLISM. painting, or a finely- executed statue, that has thrown around it the drapery of sacredness and of pious sentimentality in the circumstances, such as the scene of the Crucifixion, or in particular, when contem- plating the clustered Symbolism of a finished Gothic Church, give it a power which few can resist. The transition from feeling to conviction is short and often quick. Because they experience these sensa- tions from the works of Religious Art, they will readily conclude that the influence exercised by them is of a powerfully religious nature; but that it is only a carnal or quasi-religious influence, is, we think, manifest from the fact that it is felt and delighted in most by the least spiritually minded persons, and never is found to act as a purifier of the morals. May it not, then, be the true history of the process we are considering, that the sensitive and insincere in religion are merely caught, by a subdolous Symbolism, in the spider's web of their own sentimental sophistries. " By their fruits ye shall know them," is a prin- ciple that applies equally well as a test to theories as to men. It would not be difficult, we believe, to prove, if space permitted, from the progressive decline of nations, once great and illustrious alike by purity in / religious faith and moral dignity of action, that the tendency of external splendour and a large use of material Symbolism in places built for the worship of } God, is to corrupt and debase the minds of the people, and to bring about that gross condition of carnality of ; SYMBOLISM. 181 conception and licentiousness of conduct, in which all that is truly noble, and pure, and elevated, becomes at length buried in a living* mass of fetid and putrefying humanity. We do not say that this result is produced simultaneously with the perfection of Art (the effect must follow after the cause) ; but what we do venture to assert is and we challenge disproof of it that almost immediately after the period when a nation has arrived at the climax of its greatness, when, as a matter of course, Art has been most cultivated, and has displayed its cedar, and vermilion, and gold its rich sculpture, and carving, and gilding, in every form of imagery and in the most finished style, may be dated the commencement of that nation's decline. From this, the inference seems to us inevitable, that an excessive delight in works of Art, as applied in aid of religious worship, is one proximate cause, at least, of national corruption and debasement. The material and the sensuous here take the place of all that is spiritual and pure. We have only to cast our eye over those countries where " Religious Art," as it is termed, has been sunned to its richest degree of ripeness, and to compare the moral condition of their inhabitants, with that of those of other countries, in which the most severe adherence has been kept up to simplicity and truthfulness in church architecture, in order to see that in the latter the morals and the manners have been preserved most pure and uncorrupt. In proof of this, it is sufficient to point to Italy as contrasted with England, or Sicily as compared with Scotland. 182 SYMBOLISM. Material emblems, making their appeal to the senses, cannot possibly purify the morals or the heart. They have a tendency rather to predispose the mind to fall in with all the grosser forms of idolatry.* There seems to be a species of moral mes- merism in them, which acts with a fascinating energy upon their admirers. Indeed, it is too self-manifest to need any argument to make it clear, that the habit of contemplating religious facts and truths con- tinually as embodied in sensible and material forms, supposed to be representative of them, must tend to materialise rather than to spiritualise the mind, and to lead it to rest in the figure rather than to bring it nigh to the reality. Even when used as suggestive only, or as the medium of our approaches to the Invisible, they are not without their dangers ; for as it has been admitted by one who is, on the whole, in favour of these material aids to devotion (Dr. Moberly), " interposed means of worship are very apt to become substituted objects of worship." If this be the case, there must then, whatever may be their decorative beauty, be great peril in multiplying symbols in our churches, as aids to devotion. f The gross and rampant idolatry that has overrun the Romish Church was not all, it is to be remem- bered, born in a day : it was the slow and insidious growth of a number of concessions yielded in this * Overbeck, the artist, who from being a Protestant became a Romanist, gave as his reason, that " he could not worship the art without subscribing 1 to the faith which gave it birth." SYMBOLISM. 183 direction, under unsuspected forms, to sensitive and imaginative minds, such as Paulinus of Nola, till at length, like the ivy, which at first creeps round and adorns the oak, it over-topped and stifled the Truth itself, and converted what was once a noble tree, into a rotten leafless stump. The same course, if pur- sued generally, and to any large extent, in regard to our churches, must, by a law of natural moral effect, end in the same result. The Truth will become ob- scured by being enshrined in symbols, till its light at last will wholly disappear ; and idolatry, dark, in- tense, impervious, will settle over Protestant Christen- dom ; for idolatry is as inseparable an accident of images as darkness is of a shadow. Are we then to build our churches, it may be demanded, in a mean and meagre style, with the view of keeping our devotion pure? Is this necessary ? Now we are far from arguing that mean and de- based buildings, possessing neither grandeur nor im- pressiveness, are the fittest to foster pure spiritual worship, or to sustain an elevated devotion. The temple of the visible world around us, in its dread magnificence of lofty deep blue dome, and pillared mountain majesty, and rich tracery of forest and river, might teach us a different doctrine. There is such a thing, we cannot forget, as the principle of association in the human mind, by which it is powerfully influenced. This acts upon us chiefly through the outward senses; and against the ill effect 184 SYMBOLISM. of this upon our sensitive nature, by the association of Religion with anything that is mean or offending to good taste, it is wise in us to guard. Religion has no connection with what is low, coarse, or debased. And if associated constantly in the mind through the vision with buildings or objects of this character, it is in danger of becoming thereby degraded, and its finer actings deadened. It can exist, indeed, without any external aids ; but its health may be very materially injured by its being constantly exposed to influences alien to its own nature. As, on the one hand, if we would corrupt our religion into idolatry, we have only to convert our churches into chambers of imagery ; so, on the other, if we would degrade it into vulgarity, we have only to confine our worship to mean and degrading fabrics. Churches, then, with no feature about them but meanness, or, what is even worse, a gorgeous deceptiveness, are by no means to be taken as patterns, for such are not accordant with the act- ings of an elevated or pure piety. What best befits / a place for Divine worship is a sober, solemnising, grandeur a character of repose, like the .stillness of the starry heavens at night, which, though laying the beams of their chambers upon the variable waters of this world, seem ever unmoved : that sublime repose of mighty energy, and intelligence, and of rest amid action, being the most impressive type which this whole creation presents of the Eternal Majesty and Power. There cannot be a doubt, we think, that 'a building after this type, helps, so far as anything ex- SYMBOLISM. 185 ternal can help, to the worshipping of God in spirit and in truth. When, nowever, men erect splendid temples under the idea of making them " worthy of God," they do but display the grovelling baseness and the childish littleness of their own conceptions. For feeble even at best are our boldest imitations of the features of Great Nature. There can be no temple worthy of God, properly speaking, but the temple of the universe that vast and magnificent temple which his own hands have erected which, as seen by us, has the starry firmament for its roof, the misty cloud-capped mountains in the horizon for its walls, the broad plains of this varied green earth for its tesselated pavement, and the many sounding ocean for its organ, pealing everlasting anthems in praise to its Almighty Creator. Talk of buildings which can lift the mind to elevated ideas of God why, what can elevate the mind like this ? The works of God's own hands must be the best visible means of ascent to his own invisible abode. I once stood in the cavje-cathedral of Staffa, and never did I feel any place impress me with such a sense of the sublime. Why ? It was not because of its vastness, for it is not so very spacious ; nor of its splendour, for beyond its marvellously vaulted roof, un- supported by a single pillar, it has no such very striking features ; but because I felt that wondrous temple, wrought out by the smooth hand of the ocean, to be the work of God and not of man. If a church be 186 SYMBOLISM. magnificent in its architecture, and exhibitive of great originality of conception in its structure, our admiration is far more likely to be turned back upon tfie architect than to act out towards the Deity, who is there in- tended to be worshipped. Or, if not so, the mere thought occurring to the mind, in regard to any building, however vast or however grand, that it is of human erection, for the worship of the Great God, stamps it at once with the impress of littleness, and is a cloud passing over all our admiring contem- plations. There is one consideration, however, by which we ought, undoubtedly, to be influenced in the erection of temples for divine worship. We may make them worthy of ourselves, though we cannot make them worthy of God. We may bestow upon them our richest and best, and adapt them in some measure to the pure sublimity of the religion which we profess, though we cannot render them fitting dwelling-places for the Most High. It is for us, and not for Him, they are required. The object of them is to have places where we may assemble together to pray, and hear his Word, and carry on unitedly, but without distraction, the worship of the Great Unseen. The best building, then, for such a purpose, must be that which best subserves this end.* In their internal fittings, and adornments, and general features, we may observe, they should be * " The most beautiful forms of Gothic chapels are not those which are best fitted for Protestant worship." John Ritskin. SYMBOLISM. 187 marked by all that is graceful, chaste, and sternly truthful. All gewgaw splendour, and tawdry orna- ments, and 4 fictitious embellishment should be rigidly excluded. As they are to echo with the voice of Truth, let there be nothing in them which looks a lie. Banished be all transparent falsehoods. Everything should be real, pure, impressive what it seems, and nothing more with as little as possible to with- draw the soul from spiritual worship, arid as much as possible, in general character, to press in upon the mind the feeling that God is verily in this place. Costly they ought to be for our own sakes, truthful for God's. We ought not to lie anywhere, least of all in the temple of Truth, and to perpetuate it in wood and stone. There are no sculptured ornaments which commend themselves more to our judgment and taste, or that seem less open to exception, than flower-work, and the tracery of trees, and leaves, and fruits : these being always beautiful, chaste, and taken from nature, and these, moreover, being the kind of ornaments which God appears to have sanctioned in Solomon's temple. But all attempted embodiments of purely spiritual things, whether in stone or in picture ; in particular all symbol isings of the Divine Persons of the Trinity ought to be expelled without mercy, as tending directly to idolatry. And even though some signs there may be which are simple enough, yet as all mere signs, when they have not a divinely sanctioned signi- 188 SYMBOLISM. ficancy, must be " dark and dumb," when put in the form of images, they are to be discarded as operating rather to confuse the judgment than to enlighten to distract rather than to help to fix the attention ; and to destroy rather than to inspire the spirit of pure devotion.* It will be perceived that we incline to the opinion that religion depends for its living vigour and pure actings very little upon any kind of church archi- tecture. And even this Mr. Ruskin, warm admirer of architecture as he is, has the honesty to confess. " The more I have examined the subject the more dangerous I have found it," he says, " to dogmatise respecting the character of the art which is likely, at a given period, to be most useful to the cause of reli- gion. One great fact first meets me. I cannot answer for the experience of others, but I never yet met with a Christian whose heart was thoroughly set upon the world to come, and, so far as human judg- ment could pronounce, perfect and right before God, who cared about art at all." (P. 103.) "The fact seems to be that strength of religious feeling is capable of supplying for itself whatever is wanting in the rudest suggestions of art, and will either, on the one hand, purify what is coarse into inoffensiveness, * " Whereas it is commonly alleged," says the martyr Ridley, " that images in churches stir up the mind to devotion, it may he answered that contrariwise, they rather distract the mind from prayer, hearing 1 of God's word, and s other godly meditations." (Parker Society's Edition, p. 87.) SYMBOLISM. 189 or, on the other, raise what is feeble into impressive- ness. Probably all art, as such, is unsatisfactory to it." (" Stones of Venice," vol. i., p. 105.) But while pure devotion cannot be produced, or in any way greatly helped in its exercises by Art, that which is false and deceptive, we doubt not, can easily be originated by its sensible impressions. There can be no difficulty, for example, by means of darkened windows, and magic colours, and huge figures of un- earthly form, to excite a sense of mystery and awe to thrill the animal soul (which is quite a distinct thing from the spirit) with a strange feeling of dread, which may be mistaken for devoutness, but which has no more real or necessary connection with it than the dread of some overhanging mountain, lest it should fall upon you, has with adoring reverence for Him who built the mountain. The one may be felt where the other is never thought of. This is an entirely different thing from that holy reverence, and adoring submission, and humble trust, which a contemplation of God in his attributes of justice, and power, and mercy inspires. Men are ready enough, without having direct temptations to it placed before them, to mistake religiosity for religion, arid to put pietism in the place of piety. Right views of God, and right views of ourselves, are the two things which lie at the basis of all true worship ; and these alone can render our devotions acceptable. Without these our worship, though most gorgeous and grand in all its externals, may be nothing but the 190 SYMBOLISM. grovelling of superstition our devotions nothing but acts of ^//"-idolatry. Would you shut the Imagination, then, altogether out, as one of our intellectual powers, from the sphere of religion, and give it no scope for its actings? it will, perhaps, be inquired ; to which we answer No emphatically, No. The Imagination is the most crea- tive, and, therefore, the most divine of all our facul- ties, possessing wondrous power to vivify what to the eye seems lifeless, to give form to what is shapeless, to body forth to the mind as a thing of substance what is invisible and intangible infusing soul, and thought, and feeling, and animated existence into the multi- tudinous shadows of spiritual being the bright and beautiful, but fleeting similitudes of heavenly things, which, like rainbow hues in a fast-fleeting shower, play around us for a moment in this sensible world, and then are for ever gone, leaving no trace behind them, unless the Imagination seizes them, and gives them luminous reality in its own ideal conceptions; and no doubt, one of the noblest exercises of this faculty is, to employ itself in reading and studying those sym- bolic characters wherewith God has engraven the antitypes to things eternal upon the interminable scroll of the visible universe. But as soon as ever we attempt to fix these twilight apprehensions of ours in material images we darken them altogether : when we petrify them by putting them in forms of stone, they at once take their place among the dead. The Imagination must be left perfectly free, if it is to fulfil SYMBOLISM. 191 its creative functions with living power. And as to scope for it, there is a wide and magnificent field for its highest office, that of tracing similitudes of divine things, in the varied creature forms, and scenes, and lambent, almost spiritual images, which present them- selves to its solemn gaze everywhere around in nature. These are the proper objects on which for it to exercise itself, and not on any human embodiments of the ideal ; for these are the only types and symbols of heavenly things which are at all fitted to be resorted to for so divine and elevated a purpose. The instant you put even its own warm fancies into a material form you freeze them, and, like frozen rivers, they become arrested in their course. The mind, we know from our own consciousness, is ever reaching forth to catch at whatever is a type or semblance of the divine attributes, or of those sublime relations of man which are to be eternal ; and this argues its affinity with Godhead, and is an assurance of our being destined ultimately to hold converse with Deity, not through the darkened manifestations, as now, of this lower world, but face to face, in that world where man shall " see even as he is seen, and know even as he is known." And it is an observation worthy of being made, and with which we may fittingly conclude this Essay, as evincing the inferiority of Symbolism to the immediate visions of the mind, and its insufficiency for the highest order of worship, that the heavenly state is described in the Book of Revelation by the absence of all those material objects which here are 192 SYMBOLISM. the brightest symbols of the divine glory the sun and the moon, and the visible temple, towards which men are ever more disposed to turn their admiring and adoring gaze, than in heart to the living God. " And I saw no temple therein," says St. John, "for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it. And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon to shine in it, for the glory of God doth lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof." It follows from this, that it must be a more sublime and more spiritual mode of worshipping God to do without sensible aids than to depend upon them. THE TRUE CROSS. 193 THE TRUE CROSS. IN many parts of Christendom are exhibited, for the excitement of pious emotion, or, it may be, for some other purpose, what they assure us are pieces of The True Cross. So large is the quantity, indeed, of ligneous material shown in different quarters of the world, which has had ascribed to it this character of pseudo-sanctity, that if the whole of it could be brought together, it would, as some one has truly said, be sufficient to build another Noah's ark. Yet all of it together, we may confidently assert, would not save a single soul. How amazing, then, is it that men gifted with the light of reason can offer to this, as the Romish Church teaches her votaries to do, according to her own graduated degrees of devotion, the highest form of worship, that termed latria ; or that devotees can be found so infatuated as to pay for the privilege even of giving it a holy kiss ! But why should we wonder that impostors exist, while so many thousands of people are to be found in the world willing to be imposed upon ? Most truly has the wise man said, " There is no new thing under the sun." What is this but an old form of superstition revived under circumstances to give it a new interest the N 194 THE TRUE CROSS. senile devotion of the idolater of ancient days, winch has been scathed by the burning sarcasm of the Prophet into a species of curious petrifaction, in the words " he falleth down to the stock of a tree" ? But it is not the Romanists alone who have become wood-worshippers ; others there are to be found, who have invented a doctrine of the Cross quite as much at variance, we believe, as this with the true doctrine of the Cross ; some go even further, and not only adore a material substance, but an empty sign. The very existence, however, of a fictitious, is a proof that there must be a genuine, doctrine of the Cross ; and to discover this to ascertain what is meant in Scripture by the expression so frequently to be met with there, " the cross," and how this is applied, is a question of no small moment to the interests of truth. To an investigation into this question the present Essay will be directed. Now, that the expression is never used by Christ and the Apostles in relation to a material cross, to which any virtue is ascribed, is very evident ; for in every place where it occurs, except the few relating directly to the crucifixion of the Saviour, the expres- sion is applied figuratively, or in a mystical sense. We are told that each man who would be a Christian must "take up his cross" must "bear his cross." We read of the "preaching of the cross" of the "offence of the cross" and of some "who are the enemies of the cross of Christ;" while such are the immunities and benefits which we derive exclusively THE TRUE CROSS. 195 from the cross, that the Apostle emphatically depre- cates the idea of glorying in anything "save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ." From a comparison of these two forms or modes of expression, it is clear that there are two kinds of cross for the Christian, which we may distinguish as being the one, that which Tie is to bear, and the other, that which is to bear him. If we examine how the equivalent term " cruci- fied" is applied, we shall arrive at the same results either it is Christ who is spoken of as crucified for us, or we are pressed with the necessity of being crucified with him. For example : St. Paul declares that when he came to preach the Gospel to the Corinthians, he came determined not to know anything among them save " Jesus Christ and him crucified" (1 Cor. ii. 2). "We preach Christ crucified" (1 Cor. i. 2, 3). "Christ hath been set forth evidently crucified among you" (Gal. iii. 1). "Knowing that our old man is crucified with him" (Rom. vi. 6). "I am crucified with Christ" (Gal. ii. 20). "They that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts" (Gal. v. 24). " By whom the world is crucified to me and I to the world" (Gal. vi. 14). It appears, then, from this survey of the uses made of the term " the cross," and its correlatives, that there are two points of view in which we are to regard it first, as involving a doctrine ; and, secondly, as indicating a practice. First, there arises a question as to the doctrine N 2 196 THE TRUE CROSS. denoted. Upon this there is difference of opinion ; and in all questions of doctrine it is of essential im- portance to ascertain which is the true. It has been asserted that when St. Paul spake of preaching Jesus Christ and him crucified, all that he comprehended in that expression, and its equivalents, was the necessity of our being crucified with him by self- mortification, subjection of the flesh, and the other austerities such as fasting, long vigils, bodily inflictions, and the like, of an ascetic life. Now it is obvious to remark that, if this is what the Apostle meant, he must have preached himself crucified, and not Christ crucified. To insist strongly and exclu- sively upon these works of man's as the means to the attainment of eternal life, is the very essence of self- righteousness, and goes to make void altogether the vicarious character of the Saviour's sufferings for the sinner. The point at issue, then, in this inquiry is no other than the great doctrine of the Atonement whether it be really taught in the New Testament. To ascertain this point, we must examine carefully how the apostle applies the expression " the cross of Christ," and also how he handles the fact of the crucifixion of Christ in the way of argument. The most frequent application which he makes of this is in opposition to those who contended for the rite of circumcision, or the observance of the law, as neces- sary unto justification. Salvation by the Law, and salvation by the Cross, in his system of theology, stand THE TRUE CROSS. 197 in direct antithesis to each other. He who submitted to circumcision after Christ had died, as a thing essential to salvation, is represented as placing himself in direct antagonism to the Gospel. The rite of circumcision, it must be borne in mind, was the appointed sign of the legal covenant submission to that signifying that the individual who underwent it took upon himself the obligations of the whole law, and professed to expect salvation by the law. To do this now, the apostle asserts (Gal. v. 4), is to make " Christ of no effect ;" it is " to frustrate the grace of God," and make Christ to have "died in vain'* (Gal. ii. 21). Some effect, then, in the way of benefit to man, independently of any acts of his own any inflictions upon himself, it is most evident the apostle ascribed to the death of Christ upon the cross. What that particular benefit was, is indicated by a variety of expressions, in which the tragedy of the cross is referred to (the solemn transaction enacted there being always dwelt upon by him with special emphasis) ; such, for instance, as the following : " Having made peace through the blood of the cross" (Col. i. 20). " Christ hath blotted out the handwriting of ordi- nances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it" (as a paid bill) " to his cross" (Col. ii. 14). " That he might reconcile both in one body by the cross, having slain the enemy thereby" (Eph. ii. 16). The clear intent of these passages is to assert, as a fundamental doctrine of Christianity, its great distinguishing principle that 198 THE TRUE CROSS. an atonement has been made for sin by the death of Christ upon the Cross that the demands of the law have been satisfied by the obedience of Christ to the law for us, he having fulfilled all its requirements and endured all its penalties in his own person ; so that whosoever believeth in him, as the Apostle states (Acts xiii. 39), " is justified from all things from which he could not be justified by the law of Moses." In other words, salvation is the free gift of God through faith in Jesus Christ, independently of any works, or observances, of our own whatsoever good works being the necessary fruits only of this faith, and not in any way predisposing causes of our acceptance with God. That this is the Apostle's doctrine of the cross is made still more evident by his arguments against the Judaisers of his day. These he denounces as " enemies to the cross of Christ." Why ? Because they insisted upon the observance of the rites of the Mosaic law (Phil. iv. 2) as necessary to justification, jointly with faith in the Redeemer ; by which means they undermined the all-sufficient merit of Christ's passion. Their object in this, he says, was only to avoid persecution (Gal. v. 11, also vi. 12) persecu- tion from the Jews being the inevitable consequence of a simple cleaving to the cross. " I might have escaped persecution myself," he argues (Gal. v. 1 l),if I would only continue to preach the necessity of circum- cision co-ordinately with reliance upon the sacrifice of the Cross treating that as a permanent ordinance of THE TRUE CROSS. 199 God, of which faith in Christ was to be the complement; but because I would not yield to this specious, but really anti- Christian principle, therefore do I still "suffer persecution;" and it is proved in my own person that the offence of the cross has not ceased. Here, then, in the way of argument, we have the true doctrine of the Cross brought out and dis- played in its undisguised simplicity. It is not by any ceremonial .observances, or additions of human morality, that force is given to it to save, or that its power becomes effectual, but by a simple trust in the perfectness of the one offering there made as an atonement for sin, and in the merit arising from the unsullied acts of the victim. Circumcision, or any other rite, added as of necessity to the completeness of a believer's justification, does but vitiate the whole. " Behold I, Paul, testify unto you that if any man be circumcised (that is, with this view), Christ shall profit you nothing." (Gal. v. ?.) It is of importance to observe that this case of circumcision is to be regarded, not as special or exceptional, but as involving a general principle. If we regard it as only special we shall lose the whole practical utility of this Epistle we reduce it to a dead letter. It was not simply because circum- cision was a rite of the law of Moses that it was not to be allied with Christian faith for justification, but because it was being observed upon the principle of the law the principle of justification by works. All works, therefore, all rites and ceremonial ordinances, 200 THE TRUE CROSS. whether they be of Christian institution or of Mosaic, if observed or practised with a view to justi- fication, equally vitiate and make void the sacrifice of Christ. For salvation by the Cross, and riot by submission to this or that ordinance in other words, salvation by Christ's work, and not by man's work is the real gist, the pivot, and turning-point of the apostle's argument both in the epistle to the Romans and that to the Galatians. It is thus, as involving a principle, that the epistles of the great Apostle which discuss the question of circumcision yield permanent instruction. There are several passages in the writings of the Apostle Paul bearing upon this subject which are specially open to misinterpretation, but which, when interpreted truly, bring the strongest confirmation to this doctrine. The most prominent of these is that singularly paradoxical statement which he makes in Galatians ii. 20 "I am crucified with Christ; nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me : and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me." Here, at first sight, the Apostle seems to be speaking of a personal cruci- fixion "J am crucified with Christ;" and, in one sense, truly, it was a personal crucifixion; but then, how, and in what respect? not of his body, but of the tendencies of his mind ; and the thing which he was crucified to was the Law ; as the preceding verse (of which this is a translation in the adapted terms THE TRUE CROSS. 201 of Christianity) evinces ; for there he says " I, through the law, am dead to the law, that I might live unto God." Dead to the law in what respect ? In respect to all trust in it for justification for, as he observes in the following verse, " If righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain." But the most prominent, as the most emphatic, of the Apostle's deliverances upon this question, is that recorded in the 6th Galatians " God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom (rather, by which) the world is crucified unto me and I unto the world." : The cross of Christ must here mean the sufferings of Christ for us, not our sufferings for him (though the latter might seem to be intended) ; otherwise, it would be the Apostle glorying in himself, an idea which the strong repudiative form of expression he uses, " God forbid" proves he, from his very soul, loathed and abhorred. * The sense of the term " the world' 7 is here very peculiar. It is not used (at least so it appears to us) in the sense which it com- monly bears, for the world in which we live, with its lusts and its pollutions, its pomps and its pleasures ; but, more Judaico, to denote what we term the " spirit of the age," or a religious system. The apostle's argument here seems to demand this sense of the word. For what is he arguing against but a false religious system namely, that kind of religion which was altogether external or in the " flesh " that which consisted only in rule-moralities, and ceremonial ob- servances ? In proof that this was the sense in which the Apostle frequently applied this term, other instances more unambiguous may be adduced. For example : he evidently uses the term in this sense in the third verse of the fourth chapter of this Epistle, where he remarks : " Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world;" which he further explains in the 202 THE TRUE CROSS. It appears, then, from this, that St. Paul saw in the cross of Christ some special virtue, and knew by experience that it possessed a special power, which rendered it worthy both of his sole trust and his incessant extolling. And in perfect conformity with this, his own statement, we find that wherever he preached the Cross was the chosen subject of his discourses, the burden of his every message, the only object in which he delighted to glory. Whenever he warms into earnestness, and kindles into eloquence, and lights up into a flame of impassioned ardour, it is when he is contemplating and labouring to display the splendours of this attractive object, radiant with life and immortality. The glories of all other objects were eclipsed in his view by the transcendent bright- ninth verse, by asking, " But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye to the weak and beggarly elements" (namely of the law), "whereunto ye desire" again "to be in bondage ; ye observe days, and months, and times, and years." Then having swept away this effete system to which they were inclining to return, by one of his masterly arguments, he exhorts them in the fifth chapter, " Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage." The term is also applied twice over in the same sense in the second chapter of the Epistle to the Colossians ; first, at the eighth verse, where the apostle says, " Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." And next, at the twentieth verse, "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances," &c. We may further remark that it is in perfect accordance with this application of the term he uses, when speaking of the Jewish temple, with its typical external services, the expression, a " worldly sanctuary." (Heb. ix. 1.) THE TRUE CROSS. 203 ness of this. Not the pomp and magnificence of nature, not the glittering productions of human genius, not the splendour of the arts, not the abstract ideal beauty of what the ancient Greeks and Romans paraded under the name of virtue, not the ever- changing and ever-interesting politics of nations, seem for a moment to have engaged his attention. Even when he stood upon Mars' hill, surrounded with the most magnificent monuments of art which the hand of man ever raised, and looked down upon a scene which glowed with all that was brilliant and beautiful, and had philosophers for his hearers, we see him turning the eyes of men to this one object, which alone was glorious in his own. And what gave it this transcendent glory? Doubtless it was the fact that this, by a figure of speech, was the sacred instrument of human salvation that by which sin was atoned for, death vanquished, and heaven won. We read in one place of St. Paul's writings (1 Cor. i. 24) that the cross is " both the power of God, and the wisdom of God." The wisdom of God was dis- played in it, inasmuch as it reconciled and satisfied the opposite claims of justice and mercy, letting both descend upon the earth through the same channel like the lightning and the rain from the same cloud ; and the power of God, inasmuch as it turned and converted men from idols to the one living and true o God, and produced those fruits of righteousness in them which neither the laws of the Jews, nor the philosophy of the Greeks, could produce. 204 THE TRUE CROSS. After the world had had space given it to try all the inventions of its own wisdom, and all the appli- ances of its own power after it had tried the effect of the most subtle philosophy, and the strains of the most thrilling poetry, and the appeals of the most spirit-stirring eloquence, to set forth the beauty of virtue, and to lead men to the love and practice of it, and all had been proved in vain, then the All-wise introduced this simple but sublime agency, the preaching of the cross the merely testifying to men how God loved them, and sent his Son to die for their sins, and this was at once found effectual to turn multitudes from darkness unto light, and from the power of Satan unto God. But, as in the Apostle's days, so now, there are some who despise this method of moving the springs of moral action in mankind ; and, in the pride of their strength, and the plenitude of their vanity, they think that they can devise both a wiser scheme, and apply a more effective agency for moralising, and thereby, as they suppose, saving mankind, than the preaching of the doctrine of the Cross. Hence, not unfrequently, in the face of the fact that the Apostle declares Christ sent him not to baptise t>ut to preach the Gospel, they substitute sacraments in the place of preaching, or they avail themselves of some sensible means of human invention such as the exhibition of a material cross, or the crucifix to work upon the natural feelings, instead of appealing directly to men's hearts and consciences, in order to THE TRUE CROSS. 205 move them to repentance, and to turn to God in all the acts of pious devotedness. Even if they preach the Gospel at all, it is with an economic reserve, thinking, by hiding some of its more offensive doc- trines under a bushel, to guard it against abuse. Such is the wisdom of man ! He perverts even the appointments of God, from the idea that he can devise more efficient agencies than those which He has ordained for making men moral, and elevating them to walk worthy of the dignity of immortality. But the futility of his schemes, and the weakness and inefficiency of all his efforts, are most strikingly evinced by the fact that man never did, and never can, produce, by all his devices, expedients, and appliances, such powerful and such elevating moral effects as ever have been, and still are, produced by the simple preaching of the cross ; so that hereby it is proved that " the foolishness of God " (if the doctrine of Christ crucified must be esteemed foolishness) " is wiser than men, and the weakness of God " (if, as some think, the preaching of the cross is a weak instrument of good) " is stronger than men." The root of almost all error and apathy in religion has been the mistaken notion entertained by men in general, that they must earn rather than receive their salvation as a free gift ; and the reason why preach- ing has so commonly proved ineffectual is, that they have been oftener taught that they must work for God, than led to behold God working for them. " If," as it has been well said, " if for every rebuke 206 THE TRUE CROSS. that we utter of men's vices, we put forth a claim upon their hearts ; if, for every assertion of God's demands from them, we could substitute a display of his kindness to them; if, side by side with every warning of death, we could exhibit proofs and promises of immortality ; if, in fine, instead of assuming the being of an awful Deity, which men, though they cannot and dare not deny, are always unwilling, some- times unable, to conceive, we were to show them a near, visible, inevitable, but all-beneficent Deity, whose presence makes the earth itself a heaven, I think there would be fewer deaf children sitting in the market place." * The ground taken by this writer evidently is, that that wonderful exhibition of the Divine love which was made upon the cross is likely to be a far more effectual means of influencing mankind to listen to God's voice than any appeal to their own sense of right, or inborn moral sentiments. And in this he has only agreed with St. Paul, w r ho, as we have seen, trusted wholly to the attraction of the Cross to draw men's hearts away from their gravi- tating tendency towards the world. It is particularly to be observed that what the Apostle Paul insisted so strongly upon under the term " the Cross" was the doctrine which this involved ; he was not so infatuated as to hold up the material figure or form of the cross before men's eyes, and expect moral effects to be wrought by that ; what he dwelt upon was the necessity, the object, and end of Christ's * John Ruskin. THE TRUE CROSS. 207 death, and not the mere fact and circumstances of the crucifixion. The one would appeal to the mental and the moral in man, the other only to the natural and sensitive. Even when he reminds the Galatians that " Christ had been evidently set forth crucified among them," it is manifest, inasmuch as the Galatians were not Jews, neither were dwellers at Jerusalem at the time Christ was crucified, that it could not have been before their bodily eyes, but only to theii mental per- ceptions, through the vivid force and power of the apostle's preaching, this fact-like work had been wrought.* It is as an object of faith, and not as an object of sight, that the crucifixion of Christ is to be contemplated ; for it is only by this method that its moral ends, in all their span, and broadness, and force, can be realised and felt, so as to become comprehen- sive and abiding principles of action. Once let a truth take its place among the objects of faith, and there is this advantage about it, that it at once becomes present, like Divinity, in all time. There is a scenic preaching of the Cross which has no more vital connection with the true doctrine of the Cross than the image of a man in wax-work has with the real living world. It is quite possible to dilate with soul-touching pathos upon all the circum- * This mode of speaking of Christ as actually present where he is only preached, is more than once adopted by the Apostle. Thus in his Epistle to the Ephesians, he says of Christ in relation to them, " And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh ;" though it is certain Christ never visited the Ephesians in person. Wherever he is truly preached, there he may be said to be present. 208 THE TRUE CROSS. stances of the crucifixion, and to appeal to men's feel- ings by exhibiting the crucifix before them in all its tragical forms of interest, without ever bringing out and applying the soul-saving doctrine which it involves, or producing in the hearers one pure spiritual emo- tion. And the strong tendency of the present day seems to be thus to substitute a fictitious for the true cross an image in the place of the reality an object of sight for an object of faith. But pictorial Christianity, consisting only in sensible images, and the impressions which they produce, may cheat and delude, it can never change and renew men's hearts. It is Christ alone dying on the cross for our sins it is Christ alone in the all-sufficiency of his merits to justify, and of his grace to sanctify it is Christ alone received into the heart by faith as the hope of glory, it is this doctrine alone which can save the souls of men ; or, indeed, in any decided manner, moralise and elevate them. That " the cross," in this sense of it, is capable of producing these results is certified to us by the facts of both past history and present. It had to contend, as we know, at its first outset, not only with age-long systems of philosophy, but also with the most deeply and widely ramified systems of vice, immorality, and idolatry. The arms of Power, as well as the jealous roots of prejudice, were intertwined, and clung together to protect the then established order of things. Men the most distinguished for their genius, whose writings have supplied a model of style to all THE TRUE CROSS. 209 succeeding generations, threw the lustre of their names over what had thus received public sanction. Yet all the systems of these monarchs of mind, these princes of philosophy, fell before the cross, like Dagon before the ark, although the arms of empires were stretched out to uphold them, and the splendours of art were thrown around to adorn them, and the harps of poesy were struck to extol them. All, all were too weak to withstand the more power- ful influence of the Cross. Before this, idol temples tottered and tumbled into the dust ; the priests of Paganism fled affrighted ; the wisest were con- founded; the most disputatious were silenced ; and all opponents being driven off the field, Christianity, in the greatness of its strength, was enabled to march, in solitary grandeur, its own majestic way. Thus, by means of the doctrine of the cross was that declaration of God's accomplished : " I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent;" and, as regards the once reverenced philosophers of Greece and Rome, we may now ask, " Where is the wise ? where is the Scribe ? where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world ? For after that in the wisdom of God, the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God, by the foolishness of preaching, to save them that believe." And the Cross has been equally powerful in up- rooting vices as in overturning philosophies. Sins of the most odious kind, that were once common among 210 THE TRUE CROSS. men and commended, have been banished from society, and there has been introduced into their homes, under the benign genius of Christianity, a purity of affection and a family unity which, even in the best days of heathenism, was utterly unknown. The, ferocity of war has been greatly mitigated, while public virtue and private friendship have become impressed with a principle of integrity and faithful- ness, of truth and self-sacrifice, which has given them a totally altered character. Men that were once sunk in the lowest vices, and abandoned to courses of action the most alien to all that was pure, and just, and holy, have been transformed by it into wholly new creatures. That such changes were effected by the cross in the first ages of Christianity, we have the testimony of Origen, one of the earliest apologists for the Chris- tian faith, in the following unanswered challenge : " Inquire," he says, " into the lives of some among us ; compare our present and our former course of life, and you will find what impieties and impurities men were involved in before they embraced our doctrines; but since they embraced them, how just, how grave, how moderate, how resolute they have become." And have we not heard of similar changes wrought in our own day by the same simple means? What has turned the fierce cannibal New Zealanders into humane and gentle creatures, making them at once kind, truthful, and honest? It has been the doc- trine of the Cross preached to them by our modern apostles. No other means, we have reason to believe, THE TRUE CROSS. 211 would effect such a change no other means were in this instance employed. It is related of the Moravian missionaries, that when they first went out to Greenland they found the inhabitants of that country so sunken in ignorance and barbarism, so dead to all sense of religion, that, acting according to the dictates of human wisdom, tl. Y thought that it would be useless to attempt to evangelise them, except by teaching them first the most elemental principles of theology and morals. They tried this plan for several years, but all in vain : no improvement took place or was produced. At last they determined to preach the Gospel to them, just as God had delivered it in his word, and then they discovered at once that this was indeed " the power of God unto salvation." Those who had before con- tinued unaffected, impenitent, and unconverted, were now melted into penitence, and kindled into godly love, and constrained to obedience, becoming at one and the same time moral and intelligent, and bringing forth in their lives those lovely fruits of Christian graces which are by Jesus Christ, to the praise and glory of God. Facts like these, confined to no one country or age, and to no one class or order of men, but witnessed to, more or less, among all, testify, beyond all question- ing or doubt, to the peculiar potency of the Cross. But in what, it may perhaps be asked, lies the secret of this wonderful influence ? The philo- sophy, if we may so call it, of the Cross doubtless lies o 2 THE TRUE CROSS. in this that it makes its appeal, not to the under- standings merely of men, nor to their mere animal sensibilities, but direct to their hearts. It is so exactly suited to the felt requirements of man's fallen condition ; it so commends itself to the con- scious needs of a sin-wounded conscience ; it so sup- plies man with just what he wants to inspire him with love and confidence towards God, that it lays hold of his affections, those true springs of action, and draws him with an all-overcoming power to devote himself to God's service. All other systems of doctrine address themselves to our understandings, but it is not our understandings that govern our con- duct, but our feelings. As we feel, so we act. The Apostle reveals the true secret of the potency ex- ercised by the cross when he says, " The love of Christ constraineth us ; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead : and that he died for all, that they who live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him who died for them and rose again." (2 Cor. v. 14, 15.) In the true doctrine of the Cross, then, lies the secret of human salvation. This is the mighty power of God, brought to bear upon the sinful weakness of man. This is the rod of his strength, whereby the heart of man is first sub- dued to obedience, and then strengthened for duty. Wherever it operates savingly, it produces a deep and entire change a change of heart resulting in a change of life a reformation not merely outward but inward a reformation spiritual, practical, glorious. THE TRUE CROSS. 213 No other instrumentality but this possesses any real moral power. How entirely the Apostle Paul relied upon this instrument of salvation how he traced every bless- ing, every immunity, of the Christian to the cross- derived every energising motive from the cross, urged every moral obligation by the cross, may be seen by a reference to his writings. Is peace made between God and man? It is, says the apostle, " by the blood of the cross" (Col. i. 20.) Is the cause of the enmity between God and man, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, abolished ? " He took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross" (Col. ii. 14.) Is the condemnation of sin done away ? " What the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh : that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." (Rom. viii. 3, 4.) Must the world be overcome ? " God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world." (Gal. v. 14.) Is the devil to be vanquished, and the fear of death expelled? "Through death Christ destroyed him that had the power of death, that is, the devil, and delivered them who, through fear of death, were 214 THE TRUE CROSS. all their lifetime subject to bondage." (Heb. ii. 14, 15.) Is sin in general to be renounced ? It is because Christ died for sin, " that the body of sin in us might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin." (Rom. vi. 6.) Are good works urged? They are urged on this ground, that Christ "gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works" (Titus ii. 14.) Is any particular grace commended, such as charity, or humility, or forbearance, or brotherly love ? We have set before us the example of Christ : " Ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich." (2 Cor. viii. 9.) " Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus . . . who humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" (Phil. ii. 5, 8.) Is forgiveness of others to be exercised ? " Be ye kind one to another, forgiving one another, even as God, for Christ's sake, hath forgiven you." (Eph. iv. 32.) Is patience under persecution to be maintained ? It is because " Christ also hath suffered for us, leav- ing us an example that we should follow his steps." Are we exhorted to persevere in a Christian course, notwithstanding reproaches, contradictions, opposition ? We are directed to " look unto Jesus, THE TRUE CEOSS. 215 who, for the joy that was set before him, endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God " (Heb. xii. 2) ; and we are commanded to " take up our cross and follow him." It appears, then, from this bird V flight glance over the Apostle's own epistles, that he viewed the cross, not only as the radiating centre of all soul- saving doctrine, but also as involving an all-compre- hensive and most powerful practical principle. The Gospel, in fact, is a system conjointly of doctrine and of duty. Like the celestial system, it has a centre, bright, luminous, all -con trolling, around which all its other bodies revolve in harmonious submission and order. That centre is the Cross, or, in other words, Christ. All lines meet in him, all light and life issue forth from him, all truth is dark till he is risen above the horizon. Lesser lights are only to rule the night ; it is this greater light that is set to rule the day. Only let his light shine, and the path of duty shall become so plain that " the wayfaring man, though a fool, shall not err therein." Secondly, we are to view this expression, "the cross," as indicating a practice. We have already noticed that there is not only a cross which is to bear us, but one which we are to bear. What the former is has been sufficiently as- certained. The ascertainment of the latter is of scarcely less importance, since as a false notion of doc- trine leads to a mistaken practice, so a mistaken practice tends inevitably to vitiate the integrity of true doctrine. 216 THE TRUE CROSS. It has been commonly assumed, that the cross in Scripture denotes a something which is self -inflicted a something which we are to seek, and voluntarily to take upon ourselves. But a moment's reflection ought to be sufficient to dispel this idea. For what was it that formed the type out of which the painful notion connected with this object took its ideal agonised form ? It was the kind of death to which Roman slaves and the lowest miscreants were sub- jected for their crimes, after first bearing the instru- ment on which they were to suffer. The cross, then, is obviously a thing which is to be laid upon us, not which we are to lay upon ourselves. The fact must be borne in mind, that the expression " the cross," used to depict whatever was arduous or ignominious, was in use before our Saviour's cruci- fixion. We find Christ himself using it long before that event. It evidently was not of his own invention ; for he adopts it as a term, the meaning of which was popularly understood. It is clear, then, that we must not unthinkingly trace the origin of the term to the circumstance of our Lord having suffered death upon the cross though we may reasonably suppose he had his far-seeing eye upon that event, when he so often impressed it upon his disciples as a necessity to their true discipleship, that they must be prepared to bear the Cross. The death of the cross being a punishment of Roman introduction among the Jews, the term " the cross " seems soon to have passed into a proverbial expression among them, to denote any kind of severe THE TRUE CROSS. 217 suffering, or inflicted dishonour anything which it might be extremely painful and hard to endure. It was hard to Jews to bear the yoke of the Roman government ; it was still harder to bear the disgrace of a Roman punishment, and this kind of punish- ment was not unfrequently inflicted before their eyes. So frequently indeed was this penalty imposed among the Romans, that all kinds of pains, afflictions, troubles, and unprosperous affairs had come among them to be called crosses. Jesus seized this most ex- pressive term, which he found to be in common use, and applied it to denote that peculiar kind of suffer- ing to which his followers would be subjected (a term which became doubly expressive and appropriate after his own crucifixion), and told all who would be his disciples, plainly and without any disguise, that they must bear the cross, yea, each bear his (own) cross. The Christian application of the term, in this view, is what we have to trace out. To trace it out, we must investigate, by careful comparison, the passages with their contexts in which it occurs. In the 10th of Matthew (the first place in which we meet with it), after having guarded his twelve chosen disciples against misconceiving the result of his doctrine upon the world at large, by the words, " Think not that I am come to send peace on the earth ; I came not to send peace but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law," adding, " And a man's foes shall be they of his own house- 218 THE TRUE CROSS, hold," he continues, "He that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me ; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me ; and he that taketh not his cross" (in the parallel passage in St. Luke it is, " Whosoever doth not bear his cross") " and followeth after me is not worthy of me." Now here, it would seem, " the cross " which he that would be a Christian is to take or bear is what our Lord has just been describing the duty of enduring all that enmity, and hatred, and opposition which might be the consequence of the confession of the Christian faith, rather than let natural affection take the precedence of love to Christ. Not one word is mentioned about self-inflictions and bodily auste- rities in this Scripture. But it may be thought that if this passage is not clearly determinative of the sense which is to be put upon the expression, " the cross," others may be more so. Proceed we then to the next, Matthew xvi. 24, " Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me." Look we to the preced- ing verses, and we find that Christ had just been reproving Peter for his self-considering advice. When he heard from the lips of his Divine Master that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders, and chief priests, and be killed, he took him, and began to rebuke him, saying " Be it far from thee, Lord" (or as it is more literally in the margin, " Spare thyself"). " This shall not be unto THE TRUE CROSS. thee." Then Jesus turned and said, " Get behind me, Satan : thou art an offence unto me : thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men," adding the words respect- ing the cross which we have just quoted. Here the cross is evidently not anything we are to in- flict upon ourselves, but that suffering which will be inflicted upon us by others, if, with godly resolu- tion, we proceed on in a straightforward, unswerving course of righteous action, setting our face like a flint alike against all priestly pride and popular pre- possession, determined, come what may, to do the will of God. Again, there is no mention of self- imposed penances or tortures of the body not indeed of anything self-sought but only of that reproach and shame from which none can escape but by turn- ing out of the path of duty. In the 10th of St. Mark and the 21st verse we meet with words which seem to involve somewhat more. Jesus is there represented as saying to the rich young man, who professed to have kept all the commands of the second table of the law from his youth, " One thing thou lackest : go thy way, sell all that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come, take up the cross, and follow me." In this place the cross, it appears to us, means, generally, the service of Christ, and not simply the parting with his riches ; for the form of ex- pression used is "the cross," and not "thy cross;" and the taking up of the cross is connected immediately with the invitation " come and follow me" Come and 220 THE TRUE CROSS. take up with a life of reproach and suffering in the place of a life of luxury and ease, after my example, that you may prove your real love to God and man. It is not so much voluntary poverty that seems to be specifically intended here by the Cross (for that is only preliminary), as the endurance of a something that was to follow after from following Christ. But even if we take it to mean the giving away of all his riches to the poor (a cross to him undoubtedly, because, as the result proved, he loved his riches better than his neighbour), that is a very different thing from shutting himself up in a monastery, or inflicting upon himself the profitless penances of ascetic austerity. There is nothing of that kind hinted at even here ; but only the necessity of charity and active devotedness to the service of Christ. The next passage to which we have to refer (and this is the last that occurs in the Gospels in which the taking up of our own cross is insisted on), is Luke ix. 23, where it is written : " And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me." Here, undoubtedly, we have an enlarge- ment of the precept with regard to the cross : it is not confined to any particular act, but is extended to the whole life. But in the context again, it will be observed, as in St. Matthew, it stands connected with Christ's sufferings at the hands of men; for he had just stated : " The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and Chief Priests and Scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day." All that THE TRUE CROSS. 221 we can fairly conclude he intended to enforce by the rule of life laid down here was, that as he would have to suffer, so they, if they would follow him, must expect and be prepared to suffer with him. For he grounds it as a consequence upon the cer- tainty of his own sufferings in the cause of God, that all who would come after him must inure themselves to suffering, and arm themselves with fortitude, by denying their own natural feelings and inclinations, and taking up their cross, that is, the reproach or contempt they might meet with for religion, daily. The taking of it up is evidently put in implied oppo- sition to that shrinking from it, to which our weak self-loving nature would ever incline us. But surely this again is a very different thing from that neglect- ing of the body*, and those self-imposed rigidities of the monastic life, which some consider as consti- tuting the true Cross. To retire into a monastery is not to take up the Cross, but to flee from it. To fast merely is not to follow Christ ; but, when carried to excess, is to unfit ourselves for his service. That the taking up of the cross does not relate to the mortification of sin, would, we might suppose, be sufficiently evident from the fact that our Lord, who first bore it, and whose example we are to follow, had no sin to mortify : he was subject to no solicitations of lust from within his chief trials came upon him from without. It is true, He uses the expression, " let him deny himself," in connection with the cross, but the denial here intended is obviously that which has respect to the mind rather than the body to that 222 THE TRUE CROSS. natural prudence and self-preference which invariably incline us to adopt Peter's satanic advice, " Spare thyself." It is true, also, no doubt, that to get the mastery over the mind, and to keep a firm command over the course of our life, we must so far deny our- selves bodily, as the Apostle says he did, as not to pamper and indulge our carnal appetites in easy, luxurious living, which necessarily tends to unfit us for arduous enterprises and the bearing of rough crosses. But beyond this nothing, it appears to us, can legitimately be inferred from any of the passages in the Gospels in which the term occurs, as being denoted by " the cross" Nor, if we examine the apostolic Epistles, shall we discover more than this to be included in the term, or any of its equivalents. Take the case of that most hard tried apostle St. Paul. Whenever he speaks personally of being crucified with Christ, it is in reference to the persecutions he had to endure for Christ the sufferings which the doctrine of the cross brought upon him from both Jews and Gentiles. "We are troubled on every side," he says to the Corinthians, " yet not distressed, we are perplexed but not in despair, persecuted but not forsaken, cast down but not destroyed, always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus 9 that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body." Again, to the Colossians he says, " I rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body's sake, which is the church." He was, we know, whipped, beaten with THE TRUE CROSS. 223 rods, stoned, time after time, for his bold, unflinching faithfulness to the truth. These were those marks upon his body, and not any stigmata, or self-inflicted wounds, of which he speaks in the 6th to the Gala- tians, " From henceforth let no man trouble me, for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." It was to the heroic endurance of this kind of cross, after his example, he exhorted his spiritual son Timothy, saying, " Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me his prisoner : but be thou partaker of the afflictions of the Gospel, according to the power of God." (2 Timothy i. 8.) The conclusion, then, at which we arrive, from a review of these testimonies, is, that he most truly and properly bears the cross of Christ who endures insult, injury, and wrong in his cause; in a word, that a willingness to sit/er for the truth was the Cross which, in particular, Christ intended his disciples to understand they must take up. It is the cross of contempt, the cross of reproach, the cross of hurt feeling and mental agony, the cross of persecution and undeserved dishonour. There are other crosses which may arise in addition to this, but these are crosses which must necessarily come which cannot be avoided except by a compromise of duty. " Who- soever will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution." " If they have hated me, they will also hate you. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you. All these things will they do unto you for my name's sake." Living the life of the Cross, we see, then, consists 224 THE TRUE CROSS. not, on the one hand, in the fantastic sentimentalities of a factitious piety, but in stern realities. It con- sists not in going over in the mind and treading the stations, as it is termed, of Christ's passion, till each affecting circumstance, like the incidents of a novel, shall soften the heart into a seeming sympathy with the sufferer. It consists not in placing before the eye a cross or a crucifix, in order to call up to vivid remembrance the tragic woes of him who agonised and died on that fatal instrument, and in looking with adoring tenderness on that sacred sign, till all the excited and agitated sensibilities of the heart gush out in a flood of softened emotions and fancied pious affections. Nor, on the other hand, does it consist in those bodily macerations and austerities in which the monastic orders of the Romish Church have placed the highest form of Christian self-denial. Who can, for a moment, believe that it is our duty to destroy our physical constitution, which is as much God's work as our souls, by way of fitting ourselves for his service. We read of St. Francis d'Assisi that long before he received the stigmata (the supposed highest sign of conformity to Christ), " his body had been reduced by fasting, self-torture, and austerities of the most dreadful description, to a mere mass of disease ; his eyes were wasted by constant weeping, the ' gift of tears,' so coveted by the ascetics, and one of the indices of their physical temperament; his stomach, and liver, and nervous system were utterly destroyed ; but the unquenchable spirit still bore up, and his seraphic ardours were more vivid than ever." THE TRUE CROSS. 225 These statements rest upon the account given of him by St. Bonaventura.* Who can doubt that this is that " neglecting of the body, not in any honour, to the satisfying of the flesh," which St. Paul so sternly condemns. (Col. ii.) Yet this sort of beggarly humiliation, which consists only in starving the body, is what some among ourselves would bring again into practice. Protestant self-denial differs essentially in its object as well as its degree from Popish ; for that is to fit for arduous duty, not to merit heaven by mere self-mortification. But we must not omit, in all honesty, to notice that there are some passages of Scripture which apply the ideal of the cross to denote the necessity of our being crucified personally, though in a figurative sense, in our own feelings and desires, " crucified to the world," " crucifying the flesh with its affections and lusts," and having " fellowship with the sufferings of Christ, so as to be made conformable to his death." But all this is to be brought about, it will be found, * The absurdity to which the ascetic saints of the Eomish Church often carried this system of bodily self-mortification almost exceeds belief. It rendered them deaf alike to the whisperings of truth and common sense, and led them to ascribe to the devil the suggestions of the plainest reason and prudence. " One night when at prayer," says St. Bonaventura, " the devil called to him thrice, and said that there was no sinner to whom, if converted from sio, God would not show indulgence, but that whoever killed himself with unmeasured penance would find no mercy throughout eternity. But immediately,'' proceeds the narrative, " he knew the old enemy," &c. St. Francis used to call his body " Brother Ass," and say it was to be subdued, and its spirit broken down, like its brutal prototype. This story is retailed by Lord Lindsay in his " History of Christian Art," vol. ii. p. 216. P 226 THE TRUE CROSS. not by the Brahminical method of wounds and self-tortures, but by the mental contemplation of the cross of Christ, by laying to heart the solemn ends for which he died, by that vivid sense of the evil of sin which the contemplation of his sufferings begets ; and above all, by the conviction that it is not by the works of the law, or any sin -stained moralities of our own, we are to be justified and saved, but only by the imputed merits and inwrought mind of Christ. It is too often overlooked that our crucifixion with Christ is to follow in the way of moral consequence from his, rather than upon the principle of moral duty. If it is attempted directly by any inflictions of our own, it becomes self-righteousness, and is not, properly speak- ing, the crucifixion of self with Christ that we may live unto God. There is no principle which it is so hard to put to death as the self-righteous principle within us the first born of sin, and the last to die, even in the believer. Till this is destroyed, however, sin will retain its power over us, and hold us in bondage. But when the "expulsive power of a new affection" has been introduced, then the love of sin, together with all trust in the law is cast out the world is disenchanted of its fascinating influence over us and that con- geries of affections and lusts which have their seat in the flesh, and form what is termed the " old man," becomes crucified with Christ by a spiritual mortifi- cation that the body of sin may be destroyed, so that henceforth we should not serve sin. It is thus that the ends of the Law are secured, and can be secured, only by the Gospel. THE TRUE CROSS. 227 But, in opposition to this principle, most men are for crucifying themselves with a view to salvation, instead of regarding Christ as crucified for them, and letting this act with a sin-extinguishing power upon their souls. Hence the doctrine of Christ crucified for us or, in other words, the doctrine of a free salvation solely through the death and merits of Christ is that which meets with universal human repugnance, and draws upon a man, as it did upon St. Paul, the world's hatred and persecution. There is no doctrine which even the " good moral people," as they esteem them- selves, of the professing Church can so little endure. For holding this, if held in a spirit consistent with the principle, the world will heap upon any one a load of obloquy, ridicule, and slanderous report, which will of itself constitute no light cross. To represent that a man must die to all that is moral, and noble, and virtuous, and excellent in himself, and take his place as a guilty sinner before God, devoid of all good, in order to be saved, even as Christ was numbered with the trans- gressors when he was crucified, this at once stamps him in the world's eyes with that character of base- ness and of shame which provokes its scorning and contempt. Here, then, we find one arm, at least, of The True Cross. The other arm of this Cross is formed out of a true Christian's practice. Because he shows himself dead to the world is indifferent to its amusements and its honour is devout and prayerful carries him- self humbly before men. and yet is bold and decisive in all duty towards God will never conceal or com- 228 THE TRUE CROSS. promise any principle but openly confesses Christ upon all occasions, therefore shall he be assailed and traduced accused as rash and imprudent deprived of that hearing which is accorded to others avoided as a dangerous person to have anything to do with, and condemned to a life of poverty and reproach. Thus the scene of our Lord's rejection shall be re-enacted ; and in the mockings and sneers continually cast upon him, the man shall, in a sense almost literal, be made to bear the cross. The two arms of the Cross, then, which the real Christian has to bear, may be said to consist of his belief on the one side, and his conduct on the other, while the central upright part which bears him is Christ. We do not say that there may not be other crosses which may come upon him ; undoubtedly there are in those trial-tests which God, in his providence, is pleased to send for the chastening and perfecting of his people. Some have laid upon them the cross of a mis- represented character; some of a rebellious family; some of unprosperous circumstances ; some of sharp bodily pains ; some of deep mental conflicts. But none of these is specifically the Cross which we are to take up, that is, the open confession of Christ, with all that a stedfast, unshrinking maintenance of Christian principle will oblige us to endure. There are some who manufacture crosses for themselves, by the imposition of uncommanded bodily austerities. But let a man only enter openly into the conflict for truth, against the evil and THE TRUE CROSS. 229 adulterous generation of his own day, who would corrupt it with the admixtures of error, and he will have quite crosses enough to bear without manu- facturing crosses of his own, whether by the impo- sition of unrequired austerities, or the resultant effects of his own imprudences. St. Paul's prefer- ment was a prison; and when there, under the charge of being a stirrer-up of strife, he found but one Onesiphorus to visit him: all his former adherents stood off from him. The professing Church even is ever found to forsake her best servants when they are in circumstances of dishonour. One of the chief ways, it appears from Scripture, in which we are required to take up our cross, is, by a willingness to identify ourselves with those who suffer for the truth ; to take part with them in their reproach; and to administer, so far as lies in our power, to their support, when no worldly honour, but obloquy only, will attend the sacrifice. It is to be a sufficient reason with a Christian for bearing the cross for a brother by sympathy, that for faithful defence of the truth as it is in Jesus, and on no other account, he is subjected to contumely and scorn, to poverty and contempt, to prison and a chain. But this is what few, even among Christians, will have the courage to do. This requires moral courage, the rarest, as it is the noblest, of all kinds of courage. Men may be found in multitudes who will face phy- sical danger in its most terrific forms without a fear ; brave the lion in his den, pass undaunted through the thunders of the battle-field, or dash into the crested 230 THE TRUE CROSS. billows of the storm-tossed ocean to save the life of a sinking man, without a moment's hesitation ; and yet few, very few, can be found who will encounter obloquy to succour injured innocence, incur reproach to administer relief to the imprisoned, or nobly dare to identify themselves with one to whom there is attached the chain of undeserved dishonour. Most men, indeed, will shrink instinctively from knowing, or becoming identified with any fellow-man, however good he may really be, on whose name there rests the slightest shadow of shame. But this is not to bear the Cross ; this is not the principle which should actuate the true Christian. Fear is a feeling which ought never to sit on his cheek ; shame should blush itself off from his face, when he stands by the side of Truth. To suffer shame he should be ready ever to be ashamed, never. Principle is tested by trial. It is easy enough to profess a religion which all profess, and to act a part which all others act, and to pay honour to a person when all others unite to honour him ; but to stand by the Truth when it stands alone, to patronise it when it is a prisoner, to identify ourselves with it when it lies under dishonour, there lies the trial of faith, and of real Christian courage. Christ was forsaken of his own disciples when they saw him on the way to the cross Paul of his friends when he was cast into prison. This want of moral courage, which is too common a characteristic of Christians, works unmitigated mischief even to society ; for it leaves weakness to be crushed by power, inflicts upon innocence more than the pangs THE TRUE CROSS. 231 of guilt, and often loses to the community those whom a little timely sympathy and succour would have saved to benefit it by their labours, even if they did not adorn it by their virtues. Moral cowardice, then, which is the basest of all base feelings, is both a curse and a bane. While it tramples upon the weak, it will ever be found ready to cringe to the powerful. This feeling usually cloaks itself under the name of " prudence." But of all paralysis, there is none so paralysing as the paralysis of worldly prudence. This is both the feeblest and the most enfeebling of all the virtues. Useful as an adviser, it is most ineffective when made an actor. It can propose right measures, but never carry. It shrinks with affright from the image of its own purposes, the instant they assume a bodily shape and form. It is a thing, therefore, which Christians ought to admit with caution even into their counsels, and never to submit to when the question lies before them whether or not they should take up the Cross. One of the most trying of all forms in which the Cross can present itself to us to be taken up, is when we see clearly, and know too surely, that our enter- ing upon a certain line of action, to which we feel called by the commanding voice of duty, will involve the loss of all our friends. To have the conviction staring us in the face that those whose good opinion we esteem, and whose favour we naturally wish to enjoy, will all frown upon and forsake us, if such and such a bold step be taken by us, is indeed sufficient to deter the bravest faith, and to shake almost the 232 THE TRUE CROSS. best Christian's resolution. Yet unless a man is prepared to be forsaken of every friend to submit to be condemned as a public disturber and to have his name cast out as evil in the cause of good ; yea, to be crucified in his every feeling by the piercing weapons of power and of popular contempt, he can- not be said to be one who can bear the Cross. The true Christian spirit is a singular combination of opposites ; it is boldness with gentleness, magna- nimity with meekness, apparent weakness with hidden energy, seeming rashness with the very deepest wis- dom. It never calculates consequences in any matter of duty. But this is not the spirit which is most appreciated in the church. It is the men who are esteemed prudent, discreet, safe, that are most hon- oured, as if the highest effect of Christianity were only to make men somewhat more worldly wise. Such men, by hazarding nothing to serve others, en- danger nothing, of course, as regards themselves. The world will ever keep peace with them, because they are at peace with the world. Their religion ruffles no one, and therefore the cry of " These men who have turned the world upside down," is never raised against them. They are not thought even worthy of being traduced. They may be kind, bene- volent, charitable, within their sphere, and rigidly exact in all matters of legal right ; but they have one grand defect. They want range, force, freedom, and a fearless spirit. They never step out of the routine path of prescription. In all matters, they use " the weights and measures of custom/' and of a conven- THE TRUE CROSS. 233 tional morality. It is the safe, and not the self- sacrificing, they make their standard of duty. Such men carry no cross. ^ It seems worthy of special notice that, in the pre- sent age, the only way in which we can practically take up the cross, is by openly identifying ourselves with those who suffer for Christ, and that this is what Christ requires of us. Christ identifies himself with his injured people (" Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?"), and we must do the same by our mani- fested sympathy with them, or we shall be classed at the last day with those who have been ashamed of Him and of his word. For " he that receiveth you receiveth me ; and he that rejecteth you rejecteth me." " Be not thou ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me, his prisoner," says the apostle to Timothy ; where, it is to be observed, he conjoins the not being ashamed of the Gospel with the not being ashamed of himself as suffering for it, implying that the one of these acts involved the other. Again, he reminds him, " This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me" (he does not say turned away from the truth; that is implied in their very act) ; so that turning away from him is here spoken of as tantamount to turning away from the truth. From these passages of Scripture, we gather this most important principle of Christian duty, that an [open identification of ourselves with Christ's people in their sufferings for his truth, taking their burden on ourselves by sympathy, is the real taking up of his cross ; Q 234 THE TRUE CROSS. and that if we are ashamed of them, we are to be considered as ashamed of Him : in other words, that a mere tacit ^mission of abstract Christian truth is not to confess Christ, but that in order to this confession (for it is confession that is required and not mere pro- fession), we must recognise and take part with it when, like its Divine Author, it suffers persecution in the persons of his faithful servants. It is a fact in the philosophy of human action, which seems to pass unnoted, that truth and error have no practical existence but as they are embodied in persons. You cannot deal with crime, for instance, in the abstract ; neither can you deal with righteousness in the abstract, It is not the man who denies that there is any wrong in stealing whom you can punish, but the man who steals. It is not the man who expresses his approval of bravery whom you can honour, but the man who buckles on the armour, and does battle. Truth is practically a nonentity till it is incorporated in the person and actions of some living agent ; and until it is asserted and suffers, you cannot honour it in its living veritable reality. Here, then, is laid bare the fallacy as well as the falseheartedness of that principle upon which so many are content to rest, namely, that as they admit all the doctrines of the Gospel, they are not guilty of denying the truth, though they decline to identify themselves with its dishonoured professors; that they are not chargeable with refusing to bear the cross, though they do not choose to take part openly with those whose THE TRUE CROSS. 235 greater faithfulness has brought them under reproach. Not deny the truth by this ? So far from it, we deny the truth whenever we are ashamed to identify our- selves with him, whoever he may be, in whom the truth lives, acts, and suffers. The cross is not to the Christian an object of ignominy, but of glory. Its whole nature has become changed because it has been borne by Christ ; he has embalmed and sanctified it by his own sufferings. From being a burden, it is now turned into a blessing ; instead of being a weight, it now gives strength to all who bear it ; no longer the dark emblem of death, it is now converted into a ladder whereby to reach eternal life, and on its top rests a crown. For these reasons the true-hearted Christian embraces it lov- ingly, and, like Simon the Cyrenian, bears it, when laid upon him, not only submissively, but cheerfully. There are two things, however, which the man who would act at once as a wise and a faithful fol- lower ^ Christ, must guard against ; and those are, the bringing upon himself of needless endurances through rashness, and the avoiding of crosses out of mere self-consideration. We must not go one step out of our way either to meet a cross, or to miss a cross ; but take up willingly, and submit to bear patiently, whatever comes upon us as a cross in the way of duty to shrink from it in that case is to be ashamed of Christ. And he who has not the resolution thus to live as a Christian, gives evidence that he has not the faith which would ever enable him to die a martyr. Q 2 236 THE POWER OF FAITH. THE POWER OF FAITH. IT has been asserted by one whose position gives some weight to his authority, that the present age is " wanting in faith!' To test the truth of this asser- tion, it is necessary for us to ascertain what the writer means by Faith, and whether it be entitled to be considered, in any proper sense of the word, Christian Faith. Doubtless there is a dearth of Faith, if by Faith is meant an implicit yielding up of one's conscience to priestly keeping a blind following of those who may happen to be, by office, spiritual guides ; or if, again, it be unquestioning assent to dogmas which rest only on uncertain traditions, or the misty pillars of super- stitious imaginings such, for instance, as trust in "the mighty powers of grace" ascribed by some to the Church ; in the mystic virtues supposed to be im- parted to sacramental elements to give soul-life to the recipients ; in the efficacy of an objective symbolic worship to spiritualise and elevate the character ; or, further, if it be confidence in that kind of charity which would seek to melt and amend an offender by locking him up in the cold, damp shades of a prison. This, however, is not Faith, but foolishness. Our THE POWER OP FAITH. 237 Lord has, indeed, assured us that true Faith, if it be even as small as a grain of mustard-seed, should give to us the power to remove mountains, but he never made it one of the properties of Faith to create mountains, and much less to swallow mountains. Yet, confessedly, there is in the present day a want of Faith, in the true and proper sense of the term. There is wanting that Faith which acts, not from sight, but from an overpowering moral persuasion which has full confidence in the final triumph of truth, trusts in it, and ventures boldly on it which overleaps obstacles, conflicts unyielding with diffi- culties, braves dangers which sets itself daringly to the accomplishment of great objects, suffers not itself to be fettered by selfish prudences, gathers fresh energy from encountered opposition, is un- wearied in pursuing, unconquerable in forgiving, in- exhaustible in the welling forth of its own deep love, and wins the victory at last by the meekness with which it endures and the patience with which it perseveres. Of this kind of Faith there is a manifest and a melancholy dearth marking the age in which we live. We have become a feeble because we have become a faithless generation. The men that will dare and the men that can endure are alike wanting among us. This is, undeniably, not the age of Daniels or of Pauls. The men of this day are not the men who would rebuke a monarch upon his throne, or fearlessly face the rack or the dungeon 238 THE POWER OF FAITH. rather than compromise in a duty. Should it be said that if such men were required they would be raised up, or that, if there were the stern trials of bygone days to form them, they would soon be formed, our reply would be " There are not the trials because there are not the men to provoke them." If we had men of the fearless faithfulness of a John the Baptist, or of the undaunted boldness of a Paul, the trials, we may be certain, would soon come, just as when the wind blows roughly the tumultuous waves quickly arise. The great want of the present day, then, it must be confessed with shame, is the want of moral courage in men ; and this, undoubtedly, does arise from the want of Faith of a vigorous, earnest, brave, uncalculating Christian Faith. But let us not so palpably contradict ourselves as to maintain that the age of martyrs has altogether passed away, when we see some ready to exhibit the high heroic courage which is required to fight battles for candles ; who would sooner suffer death in a tub of melted wax than allow the light of their new law to be extinguished ; who would even clothe themselves in a sheet of livid flame rather than give up preach- ing in a surplice, and .be placed in the fearful pillory of scorching public opinion, by the engine of the press worse than ten thousand of the tender mar- tyrdoms of the good olden times before they would break the seal of a child's confession, though de- manded for the august ends of justice ! Truly our THE POWER OF FAITH. 239 day is not wanting in heroes of a certain stature. And if the magnitude of moral courage is to be measured by the minuteness of the objects for which it contends (and is ready to undergo deaths oft), this age supplies abundance of examples of towering spirits that quite overtop Apostles. But to drop irony, though sanctioned by sacred examples, and to return to serious and sober reflec- tion. It is indeed an evil sign and a sad, when Unity can be broken, and churches rent, and Charity wounded, and brother set against brother, and the fire of angry tempers lighted up to settle down in deadly animosities and alienations, Truth pushed aside, and the reign of Peace retarded, all for such wretched puerilities as vestments and postures, and the other trifles about which the zealots for externals are wont, with such disproportionate vigour, to con- tend. And the mischief does not end here. It is a fact in the philosophy of mind that the extension of any power beyond its proper sphere ever tends to weaken it within that sphere ; and, hence, this ex- cessive zeal about the external forms of religion, weakens the operation of zeal for religion itself: thus, Faith grows feeble from the withdrawal of its proper sustaining element, while Charity (which is the best fruit of religion) gets swallowed up in the whirling, turbid waters of party contentions. Causes and consequences are closel5 T connected together. One consequence of the want of Faith which marks our age is, that men have lost that 240 THE POWER OF FAITH. individuality of character which carries with it dis- tinction, and leads to the accomplishment of things truly noble and great. No one can impress upon his works what is not to be found in himself. The glory of originality, which men so strain after, is only in- dividuality in minds of any power, and this is destroyed by the slightest touch of affectation. If they could but be content to be themselves they would more often become men of mark. What was it gave our Lord, as a man, that marked superiority over other men which distinguished him that moral dignity which could command attention, that moral power which could wield control ? It was the in- dividuality of his character, its perfect oneness, its being always consistent and manifestly his own. But this individuality was the result of an all- con- trolling Faith in God, that never failed. This gave him that singular elevation of conduct which was above all human opinion and human censure, and caused him to stand in our world at once as majestic and as immovable as a mountain. In St. Paul we see a similar individuality, one- ness, and nobleness of character; and this also sprang from the same cause the singleness and strength of his Faith. But, in our times, we seldom meet with anything like this in men. What has been said of women may now, indeed, be said, and with more truth, of men that most of them " have no character of their own at all." They lose their own individuality in their timid, self-mistrusting THE POWER OF FAITH. 241 dependence upon received opinions, and appear as otter men by servilely adopting their style or modes of action. They trust not themselves to think, speak, or write, but under the fettering restraint of the world's strait-waistcoat, forgetful that this was in- tended for none but madmen or fools. They have no confidence in their own powers, or, rather, in the powers of truth, and righteousness, and simplicity, and straightforwardness, and of steadfast standing by a principle, to achieve triumphs. In a word, they have no Faith in Faith. All their impulses to action (or, rather, to inaction) are received from without, and arise not from a deep spring of Faith within. Their ruling inquiry is, " What judgment will the men of my day pass upon such a course ? What is considered right ? " It is the sanction of some high authority or a venerated name which decides them : and, more often still, the thought, " How will this line of procedure affect my standing in the estimation of others what will be the consequences of it to myself?" Thus, held in oscillating uncertainty between the doubtings of prudence and the conflictings of opposite interests, vacillation, and halting, and irresolution, and want of individual confidence and of concentrated energy, marks their course. They eitheii never attempt any- thing out of the ordinary way, or, if they attempt, they fail to accomplish. What is commonly called prudence is neither more nor less than mental paralysis. Another ill effect arising from the want of a vital Faith, is that weakness of love which fails to 242 THE POWER OP FAITH. bring a man up, when offended, to the magnanimity to forgive. This is a sadly common characteristic of Christians of the present age. In the power to for- give offences, however oft repeated, the triumph of Faith over nature is most signally manifested. But how few, in , our day, have the courage to rebuke, and, much less, the generosity to forgive, an offend- ing brother. Indeed, it may be assumed as a certain rule, that where there is not the courage to rebuke, there will never be, found the generosity, the self- mastery, to forgive. Strong for everything little, men have no power to do that which is really great. Their feelings being dissipated among a multitude of toyish questions, and not gathered up and centred in the unity of the one master feeling of Faith, they have not the power over themselves which would make them the masters of themselves. To perform a duty is always easier to such creatures as we are, than to forgive an injury. To resent requires only weakness ; repeatedly to forgive requires great moral strength. This moral strength is the gift of Faith, whose reflex influence is manifested in all the acts of brotherly love. * Anger gives birth to prejudice, and prejudice -darkens all the moral perceptions. Hence, to those who live in the troubled element of perturbed passions, objects which otherwise would look bright appear dim ; truths which would stand out in bold relief, like the mountain's broad bossy breasts, and rounded shoulders, and deep mossy recesses, in a clear sky, THE POWER OF FAITH. 243 are lost sight of, or scarcely seen, as in a thick misty haze ; and no search is made after new discoveries, or lovelier manifestations, because Faith has become confined in its range. Unless we believe in those principles of Reason and of Conscience which are the bases of our moral nature unless we have full Faith in our own inward consciousness, as belonging to all pf our kind unless we recognise those elements, or rather, capabilities of goodness, which are to be found in all who bear the " image divine" of the human form, we make no efforts for human improve- ment, and bring out none of those beautiful moral results, as new as they were uncredited, which are reserved to gladden and reward that " Faith which worketh by love." To discover any new things we must first believe them to be possible. It seems to be too commonly assumed and taken for a ruled point, that in Religion no new discoveries can be made. Because its truths are determinate, precise, dogmatic, the conclusion is at once come to that they are confined. But, though determinate in their nature, as are also the great laws of the material universe, they are multiform in their modes of work- ing, and in their effects. Here, then, is open a wide field for investigation, into which we should enter if we had more Faith. While Science is pushing its researches into the most remote and obscure corners of nature, and constantly surprising new truths in their concealments, and bringing them forth to light, 244 THE POWER OF FAITH. Theology is stationary, or makes but little advance on the road to further discovery. The reason, perhaps, of this is, that it has not been sufficiently considered how closely Faith stands related to Knowledge. Hence that other evidence of our age being wanting in Faith is forced upon us namely, that Faith has come to be discarded from being a recognised principle of human advancement. Yet we take it to be a fact, capable of the clearest demonstration, that we have no power to know, to endure, or to do anything extraordinary, anything at all above the range of a mere animal life, without Faith. Having pointed out the defects of our age, we shall, we conceive, best evince the marvellous power of Faith if we investigate its relations to these three things to our knowledge, to our patience to endure, and our strength to do, great things. First, then, let us look at it in relation to our Knowledge. Now, we assert, what may appear to be very paradoxical at first sight, that Faith is Knowledge as truly as " Knowledge is Power" This will appear paradoxical, because it is commonly assumed that Faith and Knowledge stand in direct antithesis to each other that there is a fixed contrariety between them ; so much so that where there is the exercise of Faith there can be none of Reason, and where there is Reason there is no room left for the exercise of Faith. Faith is thought not be needful to Reason, and Reason, where it has any ground to go upon, is sup- THE POWER OF FAITH. 245 posed to set aside the necessity of Faith. So far, however, is this from being the case, that Reason has no materials to work with till they have been sup- plied by Faith ; nor has it any power to put moral agents like men in motion, unless it is vivified, and energised, and prompted by Faith. This is a fact in the philosophy of human nature which is not always observed, but it will appear to be the fact upon a little consideration. Take, for example, the case of a child going through the process of learning. How does he de- rive his knowledge at first but through the exercise of Faith ? If he will not believe what is told him by his teacher, he can never acquire the very elements of knowledge his ABC. Unless he will im- plicitly regard these as the signs and representatives of certain sounds, and these sounds, again, as the signs and representatives, when combined, of certain objects, he never can attain to any intelligent acquaintance with the things around him, nor take his place among the creatures of this world as a man. But this, on the part of the child, is, in the first instance, an act, not of Reason, but of Faith of Faith in his teacher rather than of understanding of the thing taught. And as, without this Faith, he never can learn the name of a single thing, or the meaning of a single word, so, in proportion to the strength of his Faith, or his implicit confidence in the truth of all that is told him, is the extent of his acquisition of the elements of science. And this is a condition of things not confined to 246 THE POWER OF FAITH. the child, but common to us all through all the stages of our existence, and at every step of our progress in knowledge. The only difference is, that Reason, in maturer years, tries what has before been received in Faith, and rejects what it finds to be false. But none of that information out of which knowledge is concocted, can we lay hold of, and bring into the mind, without the actings of Faith. This is the law, so to speak, of our intellectual life. We must believe in order to know, and without believing there can be no knowing. In further proof of this, let us ask ourselves the question upon what does all the historical know- ledge we have rest in us ? We cannot deny that it rests upon the basis of Faith. We receive it all upon the testimony of others. We could know absolutely nothing of the past if we had not the power, and did not bring into operation, the principle of Faith. Belief and history God has joined together, never to be divorced. It is the one hook by which we take hold of the chain of all past events, and connect ourselves at once, through creation, with the Creator. Hence, what the Apostle says in his llth chapter of the epistle to the Hebrews, respecting the creation of the world, is literally true "Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear." We under- stand this, not merely because we give credit to it as a certified fact, but because Faith strongly per- THE POWER OF FAITH. 247 sitades us of it, and Reason, exercising itself upon the materials which Faith has supplied, confirms what Faith has received. Without Faith, indeed, we never could know this at all for Reason could never arrive of itself at the conclusion that all things were made out of nothing, though it ratifies that conclusion when Faith has first assured us of the existence of a God, who is Almighty and from everlasting. It is, in truth (though this is not always remembered), by Faith, rather than by Reason, we know there is a God ; for we have never seen him, we have had no sensible evidence of his existence, we cannot understand its mode. Reason, with its flickering, uncertain light, amidst the conflicting elements of nature, might lead, as it has sometimes led, men to doubt of the existence of any such Being ; but Faith, if we will only give heed to its voice within us that voice which, like the voice of nature in the infant, crying after its mother before it knows her, precedes Rea- son assures us beyond a question of the Divine existence. From belief in the existence of a God we proceed to all other true knowledge. This one fact, received in Faith, solves the phenomena of all other existences. It is the first great staple-link in the chain of events which stretches through the view- less region of Time and fastens on Eternity ; and upon this all the succeeding links, so far as they have any sure holding, depend. From this great fact, resting on Faith, all real history dates its commencement. Human history, however, has, in addition, human 248 THE POWER OF FAITH. testimony. Yet, even here, Faith is required to enable us to lay hold of its facts, so that they shall become part and parcel of our knowledge. If we discredit them we can make no use of them as respects us, indeed, they are reduced into the nature of nonentities. Thus knowledge has no foundation to rest upon without Faith. Faith it is, as respects our- selves, which supports, cements, binds, and holds toge- ther the whole fabric of our knowledge. Let slip this, let a universal mistrust of human testimony push aside Faith, and the whole at once sinks, and is swallowed up in the dark whirlpool of a bottomless scepticism. We remember to have read of some persons, who have carried their doubting to such a degree as to disbelieve even in their own existence. It is, indeed, a fact that we cannot know that we exist in our real selves in our inner intellectual being, except by Faith. For that body which is the object of our senses is not our real selves, any more than the wheels and springs of a steam-engine is the power by which it is set in motion and kept going. We might in- deed infer, and we naturally should, when we saw a complicated piece of machinery in progress, and moving regularly without any visible cause, that there must le some powerful intelligent Agent within or near it, to move and guide it; but we could not know, so as to feel certain, that there was any such agent except through Faith in the existence of man as man that constructive man which we have never looked upon with our eyes. And, moreover, we THE POWER OF FATTH. 249 <50uld not know that we exist even in our bodies, if we had not Faith in our Senses, that they are not deceiving us. But it is our moral and intellectual powers or faculties, as we have already remarked, which are more especially the objects of Faith, for these never come in any way within the ken of our Senses. These powers, too, are the sources of our purest and most essential elements of knowledge, through our Faith in their con- victions. If, indeed, there were no higher principles of knowledge in us, as some assert, than the percep- tions of our Senses, which are the most fantastic of all tilings, we must conclude that the sun is no bigger than the circle of it which is imprinted upon the retina of our eyes. In truth, without Faith in their ante- cedent testimony, we could never know what it is to know at all ; for the thing judging or assuring must necessarily be antecedent to the thing judged of, and without Faith in that we cannot advance, with any feeling of certainty, a single step. Hence it follows that we must believe our moral and intellectual powers to exist in order to know them to exist, and to act upon them as existing. If a man will be so absurd as to doubt the testimony of his own con- sciousness if he has no Faith in the reality and certainty of the moral powers within him, which are their own witnesses, as correlative to certain moral objects without him, to which he owes duties you can never convince him of their reality by reasoning, as you could convince a man by means of Reason that R 250 THE POWER OF FAITH. any two sides of a triangle are greater than the third. Just as a man must believe in the existence of lines before you can argue anything with him about the triangle, so a man must believe the moral truths which his own conscience testifies to, before you can reason with him, so as to influence him in any matter of moral duty. When Faith has recog- nised the existence of these, and not before, can Reason go to work to evolve new truths, and, by its chemical operation, combine the facts ascertained by Faith into new forms of knowledge. There is no opposition, then, between Faith and Reason the real antithesis lies between Faith and Sight, and not between Faith and Reason. The one is the handmaid to the other, or rather, by a beautiful interchange of offices, they render each other mutual service. Faith brings material to Reason ; Reason exercises and returns to Faith, as approved and to be applied, all that is sound. They both have respect to the same objects ; their difference lies in the way in which they deal with those objects the one fore and the other aft, so to speak. Faith is the tele- scope in the hand of the astronomer} by which he discovers new planets, and brings them within the sphere of vision ; Reason is the mathematician that ascertains their laws and fixes their periods. It is not that the objects of Faith are things, as is com- monly supposed, which necessarily lie beyond the comprehension of Reason (though some of them do) ; much less are they things which are contrary to THE POWER OF FAITH. 251 Reason, for then they must be rejected ; but only the things which lie beyond the ken of Sight or Sense. Reason supplies feet to Faith, in the daylight ; Faith, eyes to Reason in the dark. In a word, Reason walks the earth Faith flies through the air, and, by its keen, long sight, discovers the distant and unknown. It is a fact which, we believe, the history of philosophy will fully confirm, that most of its grand discoveries have been kenned by Faith long before they have come within the field of vision, and been laid hold of by the Reason. A persuasion has stolen over the mind of the philosopher, through Faith in a still small voice which has spoken within him, that such and such things must be, and this has set him, (still through Faith,) upon using means for their detection. What sagacious guesses at now ascer- tained philosophical facts did Lord Bacon make by the power of Faith guesses which, like a distant light amid thick surrounding darkness, have led the way to the house where Truth was found to be lodged. Columbus believed in the existence of a new continent before he saw it or had heard of it, and this belief of his led to its discovery. A shell, when applied to the ear, is said to express by a pecu- liar sound its sympathy for its native sea. " E'en such a shell the universe itself Is to the ear of Faith." WORDSWORTH. Socrates, again, through Faith in his own moral faculties, which testified to the necessity of it, had K 2 252 THE POWER OF FAITH. kenned the coming of the Son of God into our world for man's restoration, some time before he appeared. And spiritual truths, not a few, there are, which have been regarded at first as inscrutable mysteries, and have been set aside for a while as contradictions to Reason, have at length been dis- cerned to be in perfect harmony with the laws which hold rule in the natural world ; and Reason, chastened for its presumption, has been brought to bow with covered face before the heaven-illumined shrine of Faith. Some of Faith's discoveries, indeed, have anticipated Reason by hundreds, and even by thou- sands, of years. It seems as if Faith could not wait for the slow steps of Reason. It mounts on wings, and darts, eagle-eyed, to those truths which lie beyond the ken of Reason, pounces upon them, brings them forth to the light, and then Reason steps in often with a proud strut that ill beseems her to confirm them with her demonstrations ! It would appear, then, that Faith is more clear- sighted than Reason ; and so, indeed, she is. And not only so ; but let Reason put herself under the tutor- age of Faith, and look at objects through her crystals, and at once there shall be laid open to her view regions peopled with bright stars, where all looked but a broad misty sea of blue ether, while the sun of Reason alone shone in the heavens. If Reason will but keep her proper place, Faith will pour upon her her own brilliant discoveries ; but if, in over- weening confidence in the power of Reason, any man THE POWER OF FAITH. 253 set himself up against God's own revelation, in him shall be realised the condition described by the poet " Blasted with excess of light, He closed his eyes in endless night." This explains the phenomenon, so often to be wit- nessed, of infidelity in the proud scorner. It is a law of our moral, as it is of our natural, condition, that we shall see if we will see, and, if not, be left in darkness; in other words, that we shall see what we believe is to be seen, if it exists, and shall not see what we will not believe can be seen, though it exists. He who believes in the existence of causes for things will discover causes he who believes in ends will discover ends ; but he who does not believe in them will never perceive them. Thus, Faith must precede Knowledge, just as the medium by which light is seen must precede the seeing of the light. Yet Faith respects not fictions. Faith must have Truth to rest upon, otherwise it is not Faith, but Superstition. Reason will be found to confirm whatever is of Faith ; it will reject only what is of fancy. So necessary is Faith, that without it we never can stand upon our feet, see afar of, or advance a single step beyond the grovelling, earth-groping, narrow- visioned condition of the mole. The conclusion, then, to which this part of our reflections brings us, is, that the sceptic, the man of a doubting, disbelieving turn of mind, who extinguishes all Faith in the close candle-light glare of Reason, in- stead of making Reason stand as a watchful handmaid to Faith, is a man who never can arrive at any clear, 254 THE POWER OF FAITH. extended, or certain knowledge of Truth, since it is Faith alone that has the power to pierce the dark path- way to knowledge, and to lay it open for wisdom to advance on and take possession. " To him that hath shall be given." " Whoso believeth on me shall not abide in darkness." " Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou ? Thou shalt see greater things than these." It may be worthy of observation that, even in the physical sciences, the belief of one thing leads the way to the discovery of others. No one ever made any great advances in Knowledge of any kind who had not strong Faith. A man must believe in the reality of Knowledge (a thing this not to be seen with his eyes), and its desirableness for its own sake, before he can ever vigorously pursue it. It is Faith that gives to it a substantive existence in the mind's apprehensions, when at a distance, and prompts those efforts by which it is actually apprehended. But there is yet another view in which the power of Faith in relation to our Knowledge is to be regarded. We have said that apart from Faith knowledge has no power to influence moral agents. Reason can dissolve, analyse, recompound the elements of knowledge ; but Reason, with all its magic influence, can communicate no control to them over man's life. Here Reason is utterly impotent, and leaves the accumulated elements of knowledge lying powerless in mere concreted masses in man's brain underthe form of what we call "notions." It is Faith alone that can give vitality to Knowledge, bring it to bear upon the heart, endow it with living THE POWER OF FAITH. 255 energy, and convert it into real practical wisdom. Without Faith, Knowledge congeals into so much beautiful frostwork, ethics crumble into casuistry, philosophy turns into the tournament of sophistry, and piety into soulless ceremony. In a word, it is Faith alone that can change Theology into Religion. The practical power of Faith was the second thing we proposed to investigate. Let us look at it next, then, in relation to our patience to endure. Now it is evident that, to endure from others, we must have the mastery over ourselves, over our own surgent resentments and revengeful instincts. But this mastery over himself man through sin has lost. His lower passions, having rebelled, have gained the mastery over his higher. Hence, naturally, he is the sport, when angered, of base and tumultuous feelings, which get the control of him upon every slight occasion in which he is moved, through the consenting weakness of his Will. It is the Will that in all cases governs the man. The origin of all our weakness, whether for enduring or for doing, is the want of strength in our Will. We yield to evil feelings because we are willing to yield : we act not out the good ones which reason dictates, because we have no Will to act them out. The Will itself, in the natural man, is corrupt, and in league with sin. Now Religion begins its renewing work by righting and giving strength to the Will ; and in righting the Will, giving to it an added strength for what is good, it rights all the feelings, causing us at once to approve what is good, and to do what we approve. 256 THE POWER OF FAITH. But in what way, through what means, does it bring about this result ? By bringing the blessed truths of , the Gospel to act powerfully, through Faith, upon the affections, so that through the affections it shall get power over and draw the Will. It is a recognised fact that we act not so much as we think but as we feel: in this, then, Religion operates upon us in a way that is in accordance with, and not contrary to, the laws of our nature. It first wins the Will over to the right side, and in winning the Will, it wins the whole man. Faith is to righteousness just what the prin- ciple of attraction is to the planet. Why was it the Apostles thought it so difficult to forgive a brother trespassing seven times ? (Luke xvii. 4, 5.) Because they had not sufficient Faith : hence their instantly occurrent prayer, "Lord, increase our faith." Faith, then, it is that gives us that mastery over ourselves which enables us both to for- bear and to forgive ; Faith, that is, in the great mercy of God towards ourselves ; Faith in the witnessed love of the Almighty in giving up his only begotten Son to die for us ; Faith in the rightful suggestions of reason ; Faith in the voice of conscience ; Faith in the fact of our common brotherhood ; Faith in the power of kindness to overcome ; Faith in the rewards pro- mised to those who patiently endure ; Faith in the more godlike nobleness there is in forgiving. If we had but this true Christian Faith, it would give such power to our better Will, that we should never become the torn and tossed victims of passion and of vindic- tive resentment; but, "believing all things," we THE POWER OF FAIT should, as the Apostle forcibly expresses' things, hope all things, endure all things." The virtues of Faith are not sufficiently recog- nised even by the professedly faithful. Christians are in the habit of bestowing their highest praises upon " enlightenment," " general benevolence," " a sense of right," " natural piety," and the like. But what con- trol do these exercise over the passion-tossed region of the human bosom ? Just as much as the shining down of the bright stars of heaven exerts upon the agitations of the ocean. Take, first, intellectual en- lightenment. Wonderful certainly is the power of mind over the outward material world ; and also in perceiving the abstract relations of right in morals. But over the dim shadowy fantastic region of feeling it has little or no power. The convictions of our judgments, as we know by truthful experience, seldom control our tempers. What, again, avails general benevolence, so termed, or (for this is its true meaning) an impersonal feeling of love as respects human kind at large? or what even natural love towards particular individuals? Without Faith, it is a mere vague, dreamy feeling, an amiable animal impulse at best, usually a selfish caprice only in our preferences, which the slightest personal offence may turn into hatred, which wounded pride may crush, vanity blight, misfortune extinguish in a moment. There is nothing but that Charity which springs from Faith which can cause us to love under all circumstances, and though oft offended, always to forgive. Take, next, a sense of right. The ideas of justice, and truth, and 258 THE POWER OF FAITH. mercy, and righteousness, are indeed set like stars in the firmament of our conscience ; but, like the stars, though bright they are cold, and can kindle none of the warmth of a living love in man's heart. Without Faith they are mere abstractions, and abstractions, however true and beautiful, have no power. They may excite admiration and win approval ; but they never yet could restrain cupidity, or give birth to patient kindness. Faith must make them bear upon the feelings before they can impart to any man the power of self-control. Reason convinces of what is right ; faith only holds to what is right. Equally powerless is whatistermed "natural piety. 1 ' Veneration for a great Unseen Power is very different from trust in that power. Our natural faculties are equal to the enabling us to conceive of God as infinitely great and glorious in the magnitude and the majesty of his perfections; they can fill our minds with beautiful ideas respecting God ; they can even impress us with the conviction of our obligations to Him ; but until Faith enshrine Him as a living, present Deity in our hearts, invested with all the tendernesses of his character, we shall never act towards our fellow-crea- tures according to his own long-suffering nature. What we want is, not the Faith merely which believes God to be, but Faith in God as merciful to forgive, in God as kind to defend, in God as tender to love, in God as long-suffering to endure. Enmity to God, and alienation, or a disposition to be alienated, from our brother, is our natural disease. For this disease the only remedy is Faith. For as Faith THE POWER OF FAITH. 259 alone can realise the relation of Fatherhood on God's part to us, so it alone can give reality to that of bro- therhood in us with all the great family of human kind, causing us to walk, as the apostle exhorts us, " worthy of the vocation wherewith we are called, with all low- liness and meekness, with long-suffering, forbearing one another in love, being kind one to another, tender hearted, forgiving one another, even as God, for Christ's sake, hath forgiven us." But great as is the virtue of Faith in enabling a man to endure, its power is perhaps still more strongly manifested in what it will enable a man to do. All who are wanting in Faith live in the flat level of ordinary humanity none but those who have strong Faith ever rise above it, into the elevated region of the extraordinary in action. To evince the active power of Faith was to occupy the third portion of this Essay. We have asserted that it is Faith alone that can give us the power to do anything extraordinary any- thing at all above the range of every-day achievement. This we will now endeavour to show. It will occur to the reader as a remark already made by us, that it is the strong Will that makes the strong character ; 'and that the Will depends for its strength towards what is good upon Faith. If there be weakness in the Will there will obviously be faltering in the pur- pose. But if the^ Will towards the doing of a particular thing be strong, the course will be decisive. The common argument for inaction with men who are wanting in Faith is, that there are so many 260 THE POWER OF FAITH. difficulties in the way obstacles, they will say, that are quite insuperable, or risks that would render the attempt highly rash and imprudent ; and thus, under the plea of prudence, they leave all the possibilities of good unessayed. But they overlook the fact, that this very feeling which leads them to hesitate, and doubt, and listen to all the opposing suggestions of duty and interest before they act, creates, in most cases, the very difficulties before which they shrink back, daunted. They involve themselves in per- plexities of their own making. If men would but resolutely proceed forward in whatever they know to be right, they would generally find that obstacles moved out of their way as they advanced : the Red Sea divides as soon as the foot of Faith touches its margin. Often the obstacles conceived of are only imaginary, and even if real, they may, through Faith, be overcome. But men in general suffer themselves to be controlled in their course by circumstances, instead of resolving to make circumstances yield to them. They are carried along, passively, like straws upon a stream; or a strong opposing current bears them whichever way the stream flows, when they ought to stem it and buffet manfully against it, till, by the strength of Faith, they get the mastery. God has appointed that every difficult enterprise, every lofty achievement, should be an achievement of Faith ; and before Faith every interposing circumstance of obstruction, how- ever great, shall be made to sink and level down into a plain. Nothing less than this can be that over- THE POWER OF FAITH. 261 coming of apparently insurmountable obstacles denoted by our Lord's assurance that Faith removes mountains. The principle upon which a believer in God should act is, that whatever is right is possible. Whence is it that Expediency is so frequently made the guiding genius of public men in matters of government ? It is from want of Faith. We never resort to Expediency till we have lost all Faith in Principle. Knowing a thing to be right, and believing it to be possible, the man of Faith will attempt it attempt it, not with that feebleness of resolve, that conflict of the powers one with the other, which arises from a weak Will, and of itself brings about failure; but with that unity and con- centration of all the energies upon the one end which of itself tends to ensure its accomplishment. He who is strong to purpose will always, as a natural effect, be strong to perform. And if, in addition to this Faith in the feasibleness of the thing exciting him to exertion, he believes himself to be the individual destined of God for the doing of it, or has such an overpowering sense of its rightfulness or necessity as carries his whole judgment in that direction, he will essay it with a resoluteness of will, a decision of pur- pose, a vigour of effort, from which nothing can divert him till the thing is done. Thus Faith in the possibility (and the possibility is seen to be possible, so to speak, because of the Will's strong determina- tion) of accomplishing the conceived of object Faith in the providence of God to favour Faith in the strength of God to sustain Faith in the appointments 262 THE POWER OF FAITH. of destiny that the thing is a thing that is to be, can be, and shall be done, producing, as it naturally will, a steadfast adherence to the purpose, and a reaching forth after it with an arm that will not be turned aside from its object, though that object be encom- passed with bristling battlements of difficulty and terror, or lie far off, and be altogether unseen, ensures, as by necessary consequence, the final achievement of the end. Of thiskind of all-conquering Faith we have anum- ber of illustrious examples set before us by the Apos- tle in the llth chapter of his epistle to the Hebrews, taken from among the saints of the Old Testament. Nor have later times been wanting in similar in- stances of the triumphs of Faith. Not to mention the case of the Apostle Paul himself (a bright example before which every other pales its lustre), what gave to Luther the courage to denounce the doctrine of Indulgences, when the whole world was in favour of them, and to set the Pope, and all his powers to crush him, at defiance ? It was the like Faith. Look at our English martyr Rogers. What enabled him so to overcome his own natural feelings, that when the Papists brought his wife and children to meet him on his way to the stake, and assailed him through the channel of his tenderest affections, offer- ing him life then and there, if he would recant, he marched on with a brave unshaken heart, and bathed his hands in the flames that were lighted to burn him, in token of his resolve to die rather than deny Christ ? THE POWER OF FAITH. 263 It was the same Faith. Look again at Ridley and old Latimer when in the fire. What nerved the latter to cheer up the former with the immortal senti- ment : " Brother Ridley, we shall light a candle in England this day which shall never be put out ?" It was his far-seeing Faith. What, to come to times nearer our own, gave such stability to Simeon that he lived out a life of opposition in the same place ? and such self-sacrificing endurance to Henry Martyn in missionary enterprise ? and such persevering benevo- lence to Wilberforce and Clarkson in regard to the abolition of the slave trade, that nothing could draw, daunt, or divert them from their noble objects ? It was the energy of a practical Faith. The Reformation was effected not by such cold and cautious, though acute and refined creatures as Erasmus, but rather by the rough and sturdy determination of a Luther. All history, indeed, bears witness to the fact, which every one's own observation must have con- firmed, that the men who have exercised great influence over the age in which they lived, and wrought great things, have been in most cases men of strong deter- mined Wills, which was the effect of strong Faith. Among the great and masterful things declared of Faith in the word of God, is this, that " it overcometh the world." This is what can be predicated of no other principle. Every other principle of action- whether it be self-respect the abstract excellence of virtue the temporal rewards of well-doing the good of society natural sense of right social duty 264 THE POWER OF FAITH. general benevolence philosophy or the fear of law, instead of overcoming the world, is overcome by the world, and that continually. The power that is in these principles to ensure stedfastness in well-doing is always found to be weak before temptation. It cannot resist the blandishments of pleasure the bribes of wealth the glare of the world's fame nor the terrors of its frown. Faith, where it is in exercise, never yields ; but, though all of these principles should meet and combine in one and the same indi- vidual, as his theoretic code of moral influences, by which he was to be governed, and kept stedfast in the path of rectitude, they would all bend and yield be- fore the world's more insidious or terrific assailments ; they make themselves subservient to the world, in- deed, every day ; and, therefore, beautiful as they look in theory, they become actually but as bright headed nails in the wheel of the world, whirled round with it as it goes rolling and thundering along, crush- ing all in its course who will not lay their souls as the stones of the street for it to go over. Faith, then, in God, and that alone, gives a man such superiority to the world, that he can and will do what is right, though every individual living should set himself in opposition to him ; like Luther, who, when told that, in attempting the reformation of religion, " the whole world is against you," calmly and nobly replied, " then I am against the whole world ; " and went with a stout heart straight on to his object. " To be" or "not to be" is the question at every step THE POWER OF FAITH. 265 with the man who acts on the principles of the world ; to do or not to do, is the only question with the man who acts on the principle of Faith. Fearing God, he learns to fear none beside, but sets himself to the doing of what he believes to be the will of God with a resolute- ness which nothing can daunt, a steadiness which nothing can divert, a patience which nothing can weary. His language at every fresh onset of trial is, " Fear not ; through God shall we do great acts, therefore shall we tread down our enemies." " We can do all things through Christ who strength- eneth us." But now, what is the nature of that Faith by which such great things are effected. Is it that mere objec- tive Faith which has respect only to architectural symbols, and creeds, and sacraments, and those other parts of religion, which are altogether external ? or is it that subjective Faith which has its seat and action chiefly in the man's own consciousness and feelings ? From the very nature of the case it is the latter. An objective Faith rests passively in the contemplation of its object. Hence, consistently enough with the Romish conception of it, on the ducal palace at Venice, Faith is represented as laying her hand on her breast as she beholds the cross ; but living Christian Faith we should rather represent with wings to her feet, her eyes upon the crown, and the gifts of charity dropping from her hands among a mul- titude of famished folks. That which is termed an " objective Faith" lives by being acted upon s 266 THE POWER OF FAITH. rather than by acting ; but a subjective Faith (which is the now much abused faith of Protestants) lives by its own action, and from the inner man works itself out to the outer in all those deeds of self- sacrificing devotedness which evidence it to be a thing of life. This Faith, too, has its object ; but that object is a living object, one and undivided it is Christ. Trust in a person, not belief of a fact , is true Christian Faith. It was this Faith which gave such world-con- quering energy of power to the Old Testament saints : they looked for a Saviour who is Christ the Lord, and in him they trusted : and this is the Faith which we must have, if we would do great things Faith in the blood of Christ as sufficient to atone (" they over- came him," "the accuser of the brethren," "through the blood of the Lamb") ; Faith in the righteousness of Christ as sufficient to justify ; Faith in the grace of Christ as sufficient to strengthen ; Faith in the power of Christ as mighty to save. Only let a man possess this kind of Faith, and he need not trouble himself with any nice disputes about the necessity of works to salvation, or in showing the consistency of the doctrine of justifi- cation by faith alone with the parallel, but apparently contradictory, doctrine, that "by works a man is justi- fied, and not by faith only." Good works will as necessarily follow Faith as good fruit springs from a good tree. Works are not co-ordinate with Faith ; neither are they co- temporary with Faith (except THE POWER OF FAITH. 267 as the tree may be said to be contained in the seed at the time it is planted), in the act of justification ; but they are consequent upon Faith, naturally, and necessarily, where the Faith has life, or is real. The tree must be planted before the fruit can be produced. But when the tree is planted, the fruit, if the tree has any goodness in it, will follow of itself. As Lu- ther himself acutely remarks, " We do not say that the sun ought to shine a good tree ought to produce good fruit. The sun shines by its own proper nature without being bidden to da so ; in the same manner the good tree yields its good fruit." In other words, good works are not co-efficients with Faith in the matter of our justification, but they are the resulting effects of Faith ; so that, as our twelfth article expresses it, " they do spring out necessarily of a true and lively faith." True Christian Faith gives life, and with it power for true Christian deeds. Energised with new life by this Faith, which has Christ alone for its author and Christ for its object, men are enabled to tear off those parasitical passions of sin which have hitherto cleaved to them the fetters of their fears are snapped those moral obligations which before held them in a distressing bondage become new springs of action : thus captivity is led captive ; and they realise in their own blessed experience the truth of the pro- phet's statement, " in quietness and in confidence shall be your strength." 268 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. " WHAT a dreadful evil is Controversy !" Such is the common exclamation both of those who con- sciously hold errors which they wish not to have controverted, and of those who love peace better than they love truth. Are there no evils, then, connected with Contro- versy ? it will be asked. We are far from asserting that. There are, it cannot be denied, many evils incident to Controversy. It usually stirs up fierce contentions, which draw out men's worst passions; it provokes anger ; it embitters the feelings ; it breaks the peace of families; it separates friend from friend, and brother from brother ; it has a tendency to engender an intolerant spirit; it gives a sharp edge often to social intercourse ; it not unfrequently throws whole kingdoms into confusion. But what then? These are evils that attach to Christianity itself. Did not the great Author of the Christian system caution his disciples against mistaking the resultant effect of his religion, by saying : " Think not that I am come to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 269 her mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law." According to a recognised principle of Scripture phraseology, by which a person is often spoken of as directly doing that of which he is only the involuntary occasion, the meaning of this is, not that he came with the design of sending a sword among men, but that this would be the incidental, and, as men are constituted, the inevitable consequence of his coming. So far from his coming with the design of exciting strifes and animosities, and setting men at variance against each other, he came, as it was prophesied he should come, to be "the Prince of peace ;" and, " peace on earth, good will towards men," were the angel -sung words that announced his advent. So far, too, from there being anything in the nature or tendency of his religion to stir up wars, and wranglings, and discussions, it is fitted rather, by its establishing certainty in theologic truth, to put an end to all doubts and differences, and to unite as one, through the plastic power of the charity which per- vades it, all the families which make up this earth's varied and widely scattered population. As, then, it would be unjust (though there are some who would do this) to charge upon Christianity all the discords and differences, the contentions and clashing of parties, of which it has been, through human per- verseness, .the innocent and undesigning occasion ; so is it unjust to charge upon Controversy all the evils of which, through mismanagement, or men's wrathful passions, it has been indirectly the cause. 270 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. The design of Controversy, when conducted as it ought to be, is to settle disputes, and not to excite them. It is a melancholy fact, which we must candidly admit, that Controversy has often been greatly mis- conducted. Men have allowed their own evil tempers to mix with their arguments, and have contended for victory rather than for truth. In their unholy zeal, they have too frequently resorted to the weapons which were fitted to humble and irritate rather than to convince. Passion on the one side has kindled provocation on the other; pride being excited, the parties have only erected themselves into loftier and more determined defiance, each being resolved not to give in without the selfish gratification of being the victor ; and in the angry affray Truth has been trodden under foot to secure a paltry personal triumph. In this way Truth, undoubtedly, has often suffered serious damage. But this was the fault, be it observed, of the contenders, and not of the Truth for which they have contended. Nor are the spectators of scenes of theological gladiatorship always without blame for these attendant consequences. They are too apt to cheer it on in the spirit of party; to allow their own wrathful feelings to become excited ; and to care more that their own favourite may conquer, than that Truth (on which- ever side it lies) should prevail. Hence it has come to pass sometimes, that the peace of a parish, or of a country, has been disturbed ; family strifes have been THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 271 engendered ; fierce animosities and contentions have sprung up between friends arid neighbours, to be fol- lowed not unfrequently by life-long alienations. But these unhappy results, as we have said before, can by no fair inference be imputed to Controversy itself, or its object, Truth. They arise from, and are to be traced to, men's sinful passions and selfish prefer- ences, and to them alone ; and if Truth is not to be defended lest these should be awakened, it will evidently come to this, that Truth, with all its in- estimable blessings, will be basely sacrificed to secure a hollow peace. Given the postulates that there are Truth and Error in the world, that these are directly antagonistic, and that he who is not wholly for the one is with the other, it necessarily follows that where there is no Controversy there must be compro- mise. Nor, though it be tacit, is this the less actual, or the less treacherous. It will be understood that the kind of Controversy in favour of which we here argue, is that which has respect to Religious Truth, or the Truth in religion ; nevertheless, our arguments will apply, in a degree, to every kind of Controversy, which has for its object the ascertainment of truth, whether it be truth in science, truth in political economy, truth in theories for social improvement, truth in systems of govern- ment, or in whatever other relation truth is worth searching for and contending for, as of more value than error. But if there be any case in which, more than another, Controversy seems justified by the impor- 272 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. tance of the issue, it undoubtedly is when it is marshalled in the defence of Religious Truth. It may be worth observing, that Controversy is the necessity and the law of our condition in this world. In the physical world we see a contention of elements ; in the political world, a contention of powers, so in the religious world there must be a contention of principles. So long as there is error in the world to be conflicted with, so long there must be Con- troversy. There cannot rest the shadow of a doubt, we should suppose, upon the mind of any man who reads his Bible, with an honest, earnest desire to ascertain what it requires from every one who would act faithfully towards his Lord and Master, that the Truth must be contended for, and that to defend it against all assailants, is every man's, and especially every minister's, imperative duty. " Contend ye earn- estly for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints," is the general exhortation of St. Jude : * the Philippians are commended by St. Paul for " striving together for the faith of the Gospel ;"f while the same Apostle makes it one of the qualifica- tions of a bishop (or "elder"), that he should be able by sound doctrine both to exhort (that is, the obediently disposed) and to convince (that is, by argument) " the gainsay ers."J By his own example, also, he gave sanction to the same course ; for we * Jude 2. f Phil- i- 27. J Titus i. 9. THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. read that " lie disputed in the synagogue with the Jews and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him" (at Athens). Again, at Corinth " he spake boldly for the space of three months, disputing and persuading the things concerning the kingdom of God." With the sticklers for circumcision also, at Antioch, he " had no small dissension and disputation ;" while at the same place he withstood even the Apostle Peter to the face, in a matter of ceremonial conformity which involved the compromise of a fundamental principle. The duty, then, of engaging in Controversy for the defence of the Truth is clear, if we take Scripture for our guide; the only question that can be raised is, as to the manner, or spirit, in which this should be conducted. St. Jude says, " contend earnestly." Now a man may, undoubtedly, contend earnestly without con- tending passionately, though the one is very liable to be mistaken for the other. Where there is vehe- mence, it is thought there must be anger. But there may surely be all the vehemence of strongly excited feeling, when there is none of the vehemence of irritated temper. Strong feeling will naturally exhibit itself in strong expressions. He who can be wholly unimpassioned when contending for the Truth must have a very shallow sense of its importance. But the passion which springs from strong sentiment is very different from the passion which springs from personal anger. And it is only when the vehemence of the advocate takes the form of personal resent- 274 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. irient that Controversy can fail of beneficial effect. Then indeed it provokes resistance ; and so far from ending in conviction, it only rivets on error the faster by bringing out all the perversity of human wilfulness to the support of the adopted false principle. It is not the heretic, but the heresy, which a sincere lover of his kind will seek to assail, and if possible to overthrow. His object will be, not to provoke, but to argue with, in order to convince. And there certainly must be a way in which it is possible (or the Apostle would not have enjoined it as a duty) to be strenuous and even uncompromising on the side of Truth, without violating any of the gentle precepts of Christian chanty. When zeal is tempered with charity, Controversy can never be followed by any seriously mischievous results, but must, by the very conditions of necessity out of which it arises, be effective of more good than evil. Truth can never suffer ultimately by its claims being agitated. There must always be better argu- ments to be adduced in its favour, from its own intrinsic excellences, than any that can be advanced against it ; it would be unfair, therefore, towards the Truth not to give it all the advantage of its own self- supplied defences. If fairly set forth in its own towering majesty, breasted around with all those buttresses of reason and argument which are its native supports, it must stand. Let its claims be called in question, and Controversy, coming to its defence, must, if rightly managed, secure it a triumph THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 275 against every rival theory, however specious. The sophistry in which error tries to hide itself will be hereby exploded ; the false colours in which wit and rhetoric may have clothed it will be stripped off; its nakedness will be exposed, and Truth, standing out by the contrast in all its solidity, and grandeur, and beauty, will win a way for itself to every candid man's acceptance. Truth, like honesty, needs only to be clearly established, in order to prove its own passport, There is another way in which Controversy is of advantage ; it serves, not only to ascertain Truth, but to keep it pure. Corruptions are ever ready to graft themselves upon the Truth, as moss upon the tree, if it be not exposed to the sun, and kept in healthful action by the wind ; or, to change the figure, as stagnant waters soon get covered with duck-weed, and become unwholesome, so religious truth, if too long quiescent, gets overspread with the noxious miasma of errors. It is the stirring of the waters that keeps them healthful. Whence is it that in different ages of the Church, though it had the same infallible Word to appeal to that we have now, errors in doctrine and corruptions in practice have crept in and overrun Christianity ; but that Christian men, having grown to be greater lovers of their own ease than zealous for the sacred integrities of Truth, have become (as under such a principle they ever do become) averse to the rough conflicts of Controversy, and have passively yielded to 276 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. that which they ought stoutly to have resisted. Upon this point it may not be out of place to quote the words of one of the most reflective writers of the present day : * " Alas the infirmity," he exclaims, " of human nature ! How has truth suffered in the world, from age to age, from the want of moral courage, even among the most conscientious and en- lightened of men ! In fact, it is these who, by their timidity, just when and where they should have feared none but God it is these who have betrayed Christianity, and have sent it down to their successors laden with corruptions : it was these who, although it was but a slender service they could render it by endorsing it with their bright names, have inflicted upon it a deep and lasting injury by sustaining in this manner the credit of those spurious systems with which themselves stood connected." In their extreme anxiety for peace there are some persons who, though lovers of Truth, will exert little or no care to secure the purity of Truth. " Let us have no Controversy," is their cry. So strong, indeed, is their dislike to it that they will sometimes go so far as to assert that where Controversy is in- dulged in there can be no Christianity. We wonder it never occurs to such persons that, in deprecating all Controversy, they are playing into the hands of the enemy, and helping on their mischievous devices. It is the corrupters of the Faith only who have any * Isaac Taylor " Life of Loyola," p. 329. THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 277 reason to fear the result of Controversy. Truth courts discussion ; and by discussion its superior claims are asserted. The enemies of the Truth most characteristically would put an arrest upon all con- troversial discussions muzzle the mouth, and padlock the press. In Romish countries, to this day, all Con- troversy on religious questions is strictly prohibited. Is this the order of things which any reasonable man would wish to see restored in our own ? It is amazing that any men who read the Scrip- tures, and profess to regard the examples of inspired men as equivalent to a divine sanction, can denounce Controversy as unchristian. The Bible is essentially a controversial book. It contains God's great contro- versy with man. It is a history of the controversies that have been carried on from age to age by his faithful servants with an apostate and revolted world. Noah had a controversy with the antediluvians Moses entered into an acted controversy with the Egyptian magicians Samuel had a controversy with the Israelites the Prophets were continually, one after another, challenging to a direct controversy the corrupters of the faith in their several days. Our blessed Lord was incessantly engaged in controversy with the Jews. The Apostles, and especially that greatest of all dialecticians, St. Paul, took up the same line of attack, and boldly challenged the im- pugners of Truth to an open disputation respecting the claims of Christianity; and by Controversy it was they succeeded in overthrowing both the strongholds 278 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. of Judaism and the gigantic pile of gorgeous super- stition which heathen fancy had erected. To what, too, is it that we, in this country, owe our pure system of religious belief, those sound evan- gelical doctrines which are at once our blessing and our boast, but to Controversy ? Our forefathers contended for them even unto death, and rescued Truth not only from under a crushing mass of degrading superstitions, but, as it were, out of the very fires, that it might shine as a lamp to distant generations. If they had been men of weak and timid spirits, if they had yielded to worldly compromise for the sake of personal security, or if they had loved their own quiet more than they loved the Truth, we should have been left to grope in Popish darkness, amid pitfalls and fancied purgatories, to the present day. But they saw the Gospel overlaid and dishonoured by gross corruptions and idolatries ; they saw men in danger of being mis- led and betrayed to their own everlasting destruction; and they loved both too well not to make a struggle for their rescue, though it was to the perilling of their own lives. Their charity consisted not in soft words, but in self-sacrificing acts. These brave-hearted men fell in the contest, but Truth triumphed, arid lives in their works. They brought argument to bear in the defence of Truth, and by argument the Truth prevailed. To enshrine itself in the cut and polished stone-work of argument is the glory of Christianity. To go on the forlorn hope of Truth is always a hazardous adventure, for which few will be found to THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 279 volunteer. Yet the Truth must be fought for, if it is to be won and kept. And it is probably one great part of our moral trial, in this our probationary state, that we should be placed in the midst of contentions and antagonistic influences, both in order that our own virtue may be put to that test by which it may be be strengthened, and that it may be seen whether we will prove ourselves honest and faithful. Grant that Controversy is encompassed with many sharp and painful points from which nature shrinks grant that it may lay a man open to much misrepresentation, and bring upon him many hard blows, is a Christian to shrink from his duty because it is encompassed with circumstances of difficulty ? It tends to embitter the temper and to make inroads upon a man's own peace, undoubtedly; but because it is not easy to carry it on in a right spirit and without injury to him- self, is he to leave it wholly unattempted when called for ? Ought he not rather, while guarding himself, like a man rescuing others out of fire-damp, as care- fully as he can against noxious exterior influences, to go courageously forward in the pursuit of his object, till he can return in triumph, with Truth for his prize, to be re -en throned, like an exiled but restored Prince? The dread which some men have of Controversy is so quick and sensitive, and full of imaginary terrors, that it amounts positively to a disease. They regard it as the most pernicious of all evils as a pure, un- mixed mischief. As their idea of it rests altogether upon a morbid fancy, it would be as useless to reason 280 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. with them as it would be to reason with a man who, in the midst of broad daylight, was persuaded he saw the air filled with dancing demons. In an ease-loving and luxurious age like the present, few indeed can be expected to feel favour- able to the rough storms of Controversy. Various are the pleas and self-satisfying reasons, according to the various temperaments and fancies and cherished notions of the individuals, by which this person and that would .put an extinguisher upon all controversial disquisitions. One will assert that Controversy, or the argumentative discussion of the doctrines of religion, does, in all cases, more harm than good; another will say (what is very true) that argument by itself will never convert souls ; a third will main- tain that no man is ever convinced by argument that what every one wishes to believe that he will believe, address what reasons you may against it to his judgment ; while a fourth, more absurd still, will hold that to bring a strong force against the fort of Error is only the way to fortify the adopter of a mis- taken creed the more strongly within the battlements of his own erroneous belief. It is certainly the fact that there are some individuals whom it would be vain to argue with in opposition to any of their re- ceived theories crotchety individuals, whose heads are possessed with some peculiar notions about races, or the shape of skulls and noses, out of which all the seven wise men of the world, united, could not argue them individuals these who are deeply affected with THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 281 the disease commonly described by the word idiosyn- crasy. But to adopt their theories as true in the general would be to deny and overthrow the dis- tinctive principle of human nature its rationality. It may be that most persons are more easily in- fluenced when their feelings are appealed to rather than their reason ; but reason they have, and if they are capable of weighing arguments addressed to their reason, then by those arguments, if good ones, they must be capable of being convinced. When, however, the question relates to religious conviction, when the point raised is whether this can ever be brought about by argument, or through the medium of controversy, the only alternative is to appeal to Scripture to ask " what is written;" and Scripture, as we have already shown, answers de- cisively in the affirmative. The necessity of a continued resort, from time to time, to Controversy, rests upon two things the obscurity that hangs over all moral questions, and the ever-changing phases of religious opinion. It is a painful fact, of which we have continual evidence, that truth and error are so intermixed in our world, and often so artfully disguised, that it is difficult to distinguish the one from the other. They are directly antagonistic in their nature, but they cannot always be brought to close conflict. They fight off, so to speak, from each other; the one through fear of having its hollo wness exposed, and the other through the personal timidity, or doubts, 282 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. of its defenders. If they can be brought to meet in a fair struggle (and this can be done only through Controversy), Truth, having the superior claims, must come off the victor. It is a sadly truthful observation made by a great living writer,* that " it has become a point of polite- ness not to inquire too deeply into our neighbour's religious opinions. The fact is, we distrust each other and ourselves so much, that we dare not press this matter; we know that if, on any occasion of general intercourse, we turn to our neighbour and put to him a searching or testing question, we shall, in nine cases out of ten, discover him to be only a Christian in his own way, and as far as he thinks proper, and that he doubts of many things which we ourselves do not believe strongly enough to hear doubted without danger, What is in reality cowardice and faithlessness we call charity, and consider it the part of benevolence sometimes to forgive men's evil practice for the sake of their accurate faith, and some- times to forgive their confessed heresy, for the sake of their admirable practice.'* New forms of error, new opponents to " the truth as it is in Jesus," will ever be springing up to demand the replies of sound argument to repulse or explode. Religious opinion in the world, chameleon like, is habitually changing colour it never continues long the same old fallacies are revived, and errors * John Ruskin. It is such truthful observations as these, con- tinually dropped, which make his writings so well worth reading-. THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 283 which have lain buried for ages are reproduced in all the vigour of a new life. Truth alone remains un- changed ; and Truth being a sword with two edges, may, if handled skilfully, be made to flash through and disperse the darkness of Error in one direction, while, by the brightness of its blade, it displays Righteousness in the other. This is a weapon powerful at once to convince and to convert. It is not systems only that need to be repelled by argument, but individuals have to be rescued from error. Opposed as Truth is on all sides, and having such mighty forces of prejudice and passion to con- tend against, it can never make way in the world, or even keep its ground, except by the strenuous exer- tions of its defenders. God has revealed his Truth to Prophets and Apostles ; he has caused the letter of it to be written in his imperishable word ; but he has committed the keeping of it, as a living, energetic reality, to his church or faithful people. Now how, we would ask, can that Truth be upheld, if it is never to be defended ; or how can it be kept in its intact integrity, if its assailants are not to be withstood ; or how can it make progress among men, by the con- viction of the gainsayer, and the conversion of the sinner, if it is never to be brought into direct per- sonal collision with their false principles and pre- judices ? The philosophy, so to term it, of Truth seems indeed to be little understood. Men get possessed with the romantic and delusive idea that Truth is of T 2 284 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. itself omnipotent. " Great is the Truth, and it will " (not shall) " prevail," is their favourite maxim. In the approval of this sentiment they passively rest, expect- ing the Truth to effect everything by itself. Now it is well worthy of observation that Truth is wholly inert and inoperative in the abstract : it has no power till it is applied. This admits of a simple illustration. A lever, while it lies on the ground, strong as it may be in itself, can effect nothing ; just so Truth, while it lies unapplied, tinder mere human cognisance or approval, is powerless. It must have a fulcrum to turn upon that fulcrum it finds in our common nature ; it must have a hand to press it down that hand is Faith ; and it is only when brought into direct contact with error in some way of Controversy, that it is effective to up^ heave and overthrow its massive fabrications. But, "Truth is not a mechanical power, to be mechanically applied," we can imagine some keen- witted objector will answer. " Truth is like light, which disperses darkness by its own inherent power." Granted ; but surely the light must be let in upon the darkness for this effect to be produced. You have taken nothing, then, by your objection, except it be a condemnation of your own indifference. But further, we may illustrate and confirm our position by a parallel example. "Righteousness," we are told, " exalte th a nation ; " but it is not Righteousness in the abstract, or in bare approval, that exalteth a nation, but Righteousness as embodied in just laws, righteously applied to the punishment of offenders, THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 285 and as acted upon in its principles by the general population. "Great is the Truth, and it will prevail," mutters the cold, contemplative philosopher in his study. " Great is the Truth, and it will prevail," shouts the theoretic, unpractical politician in the senate. Both quote this maxim, be it observed, not as a reason for their trust- fully acting upon the believed potency, and defending the just rights of Truth, but as an excuse for leaving the Truth to take care of itself. Hence it is not un- common to hear them argue, that to use any direct means to secure the established prevalence of Truth in religion, that to allow it to come in any way into collision with Error, or to fortify and enforce it by creeds and statutes, is altogether to distrust the power of Truth. most inconsistent reasoners ! how pal- pably do they stand self-condemned ! For, would they argue thus with regard to their own social rights, the sacredness of their character, or the security of their property ? Would they say, " Great is the power of Justice," and then leave it to the ideality of Justice to vindicate them from all wrongs ? They never act upon this Gallio -principle in regard to anything in which they feel a real interest. Their faith, then, in the power of Truth is evidently only that dead faith which is without works. The ideality of justice is, doubtless, a great help towards bringing a jury to the conviction on which side the right lies, but then there must be the appeal. The man who really believes that there is a mighty 286 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. power in Truth will set himself to make that Truth bear, in some direct way, upon a fitting fulcrum for the upturning of Error. But here we must be careful to distinguish be^ tween the duty to wield the sword of Truth for the vindication of the rights of Truth, and what might seem, at first sight, a duty of parallel obligation which is, to apply force for the extermination of Falsehood. This latter is the persecutor's principle. But the one duty is not truly or logically parallel with the other, and seems parallel only by running straight in the opposite direction. It would, indeed, be a want of faith in the inherent majesty of Truth to resort to sucli an unspiritual expedient for its tri- umph. Heresy can never be effectually extin- guished except by its refutation. Every attempt to put it down by persecution has failed, and ever must fail, because it fails to convince. Truth is always sufficient of itself to carry conviction to the mind, and to incline the judgment on the right side, if it be rightly, skilfully, and faithfully applied. Of those who have taken up the weapons of Con- troversy, most have thought rather of handling them, as they would say, "judiciously" than of handling them effectively. Careful to offend no party, they have won for themselves what, perhaps, they most wished, the title of "moderate men," "prudent men," or, higher still, of "judicious men." But what has been the result to others ? They have convinced few who were not already of their own opinion. THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 287 They have balanced the claims of Truth and Error so nicely, and with such a constant interchange of the weights from the one side to the other, that no one has known on which side the Truth finally lay. They have adopted such ambiguous, mediating, Janus- faced phraseology, that it may be interpreted in either of two opposite senses. This is too much the case even with the (in some respects) justly styled "judicious Hooker;" so that parties the most directly opposed to each other can, and do, equally defend themselves out of his armoury. To evince the justness of these observations, we may be permitted to remind the reader of this physical fact (its moral application he will see him- self) that if any one takes hold of a lever so exactly in the middle that it will turn either way, he deprives it of all power. The ineffectiveness of most of the sermons of the present age may, we believe, be traced to the same mistake. They are too ambiguous and inde- cisive in their statements. There is not in them that direct confronting of Truth to Error, nor that simple, broad enunciation of religious doctrines, nor that fearless grappling with the individual con- science, of which we find example in the Scriptures. What are many of them, in fact, but a string of pointless sentences, nicely measured, it may be, but without much meaning ; a series of flat, square walls, plastered with common-place truisms, where nothing strikes ; rooms lighted up with candle-light 288 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. sense ; discourses, in short, such as any one was competent to preach, and no one cares to hear or to remember, or could remember if he cared ? What wonder, then, that sermons in the present day excite so little interest and produce so little effect. Truth in vague generality is no more instruction than wind is music. Truth, too, when not gathered into force and applied to a direct purpose, can make no im- pression. To be felt and apprehended, its object must be seen. Unless the Truth be made to take a particular bearing it can have no productive power ; just as the wind must be made to pass through pipes, and be modulated by a skilful hand, or it cannot issue forth in the distinctive sounds of music. " If the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself for the battle?" There is a question of some difficulty, and of still greater delicacy to determine, connected with this part -of our argument, which is, How far is it consistent with Christianity to be what is termed personal ; to point de- scriptively at individuals ; to designate heresies by the names of their authors ; or to use, in any way, severe condemnatory language in reference to the opposers and corrupters of the Faith ? The spirit of the age strongly inclines every one to the opinion that it is wholly inconsistent with Christian charity to speak harshly or pointedly of any persons, whatever may be their conduct. The fashion is to deal only in generals. Instead of yielding at once to this opinion because it is in the fashion, it will be far more honest THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 289 in us to endeavour to ascertain first, whether this mode, or the opposite, is most in accordance with Scripture example. Now the Prophets were often, beyond question, very personal ; they directly, and by name, assail the enemies of God's truth. But we will pass over them, as it might, perhaps, be pleaded that they had a special mission, a peculiar authority, or were led thus to act by the spirit of prophecy. Let us look, rather, to see how Christ and his Apostles acted. Now, if we examine the epistles of the great Apostle St. Paul, we meet with numerous instances in which he points out individuals by name as faith- less, or offenders against the Truth. Thus we find him mentioning Hymeneus and Alexander* Phy- gellus and Hermogenes^ Hymeneus and Philetus^ as persons of this kind. But what is more remark- able still, we find the gentle, the beloved disciple John denouncing a certain Diotrephes by name, in terms of the harshest censure, imputing to him pride the highest, and malice of the deepest dye. It may, however, be worthy of being noted, that these in- stances all occur in epistles addressed to indivi- duals, in letters, therefore, which may be considered to have been of a somewhat private nature, though afterwards to be read in public assemblies. In none of the larger general epistles of the Apostles, addressed to churches or collective bodies, have we discovered * 1 Tim. i. 20. f 2 TIm - * 15 - I 2 Tim - " 17 ' 3 John 9. 290 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. a similar mention of persons by name, except it be for commendation, or, at the most, gentle admonition. The line, therefore, which it seems we must draw, the distinction we must make, is, that names may be mentioned by individual to individual, in Christian let- ters to be read privately, to put them on their guard against deceivers and traitors, but the offenders must not be placed on the gibbet before public assemblies. There is nothing, however, in apostolic example to for- bid such a graphic portraying of persons, such marked and bold sketching of individual character or action, that whosoever reads may detect the original, when such public mischiefs as the perverters and corrupters of true doctrine need to be unmistakably designated. Instances of irony the most mocking, of sarcasm the most severe, of denunciation the most withering, we find, times without number, in the writings of the Apostles, and more especially of St. Paul. His object in all these cases is to lay open the hollowness of the pretensions, to weaken the influence of the false teachers, and not to indulge private pique. The use of such language, then, we may regard as justified when it has a worthy end ; or, to be more precise, it is lawful to be objectively, but not sub- jectively, personal, personal in the application of our descriptions, but not in the spirit which dictates them when, and only when, to be so will subserve the ends of Truth and Righteousness. On this point we shall probably find ourselves at issue with many good men ; but we have, we think, THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 291 the better warrant. How, indeed, those gentle, good- natured souls who, because they adopt terms of equal moderation, whether they are speaking of persons of the loftiest virtue, or of the subtlest craftiness, arrogate to themselves the sole possession both of charity and humility, can reconcile with their view of what is right the words of Christ in relation to Herod, " Go and tell that/oa; that to-day and to-morrow I do miracles, and the third day I shall be perfected," we must confess ourselves at a loss to understand. But, with such examples before us, furnished both by Christ and his Apostles (we might adduce many similar ones from the writings of the Prophets, the mockery of Elijah at the Prophets of Baal will occur to every one's memory), we leave it to the candid reader to decide whether the practice of good old Bishop Lati- mer, and others of the Reformers, of speaking point- edly and strongly, and by name, of those who opposed the truth of God, was not much more in accordance with Scripture pattern than the more soft and meaningless generalities of modern times. There is much reason to fear, indeed, that the servants of God in this latter age have too much compromised matters with the world, that they have come to a sort of mutual understanding, the conditions of which might be not unaptly expressed by the words, " Speak gently of me, and I will speak gently of you." For what do we find to be the fact ? Why, that many now hold it to be wrong even to denominate or to denounce a heresy by the name of its author, though we find 292 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. the glorified Saviour himself doing this very thing from his throne in heaven, addressing the Ephesian Church in these words, "But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitanes, which I also hate,"* arid repeating it again in the same chapter " the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, which I also hate."f It may be worth while to repeat here what we have noticed in a former chapter, that Truth and Error cannot be separated practically from persons, to illustrate it afresh, any more than gravitation can be separated from solid bodies ; and as we can deal with gravitation only, as it acts upon or through matter, so we can deal with moral principles only as they are found embodied in persons. Apart from them, Truth and Error are airy abstractions, to fight with which is only to aim blows at shadows. What we have to deal with, actually, is principles, either as embodied in men, or in their bearings upon men their interests and their hopes. Here we must necessarily resort to Controversy, though it be only to stay the false direc- tion of Controversy. What are the proper limits or questions for Con- troversy ? is the point to which we will next direct our inquiries. In respect to this we believe it will be found that many do grievously transgress. Upon examining the epistles of St. Paul to Timothy and Titus, in which more particularly he lays down the duties of those whose office it is to defend the Faith, we meet with various remarks which evince most clearly * Rev. ii. 6. f R ev. ii. 15. THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 293 that all Controversy, or contention, ought to be restricted to questions of fundamental doctrine to those great cardinal truths, in short, upon the preserved integrity of which hangs the salvation of men. He prohibits, in the strongest terms, all disputes about doubtful or indif- ferent matters, all questions of mere words, all private fancies and fabulous stories, all that fosters a profane and curious spirit, all that tends to engender strife without forwarding truth or individual edification. And yet, with these apostolic rules before them, there are some who will argue as earnestly, nay even more earnestly, for that kind of genealogy which they de- signate by the phrase "apostolic succession," for forms of church government, for theologic technicalities, for their own profane fancies and baseless theories, for pos- tures and compass points in divine worship, yea, for the shape of a surplice sleeve and the trimmings of an altar cloth, than for " the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith." All who square not exactly with their notions in these matters, they unhesitatingly condemn as hardly being Chris- tians. Now this is fatuity and not only fatuity, it is impiety, and that of the most offending kind. It is utterly at variance with that lofty indifference to minute distinctions, that wide-hearted charity which the Apostle inculcates in the fourteenth chapter to the Romans, and elsewhere. It is palpable, from the most superficial glance at the principles which he lays down there, and the reiterated remarks which he makes in his epistles to Timothy and Titus, that for 294 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. no minor, or doubtful, or trifling points, ought we ever to take up the sharp-edged weapons of Controversy. Christian casuistry is not of a minute but of an en- larged compass ; over all microscopic differences it throws the covering mantle of a considerate charity. "One man belie veth that he may eat all things; another, that is weak, eateth herbs." Well, let each eat what he believes to be lawful, and not attempt to force his private opinion or scruples upon others. " Destroy not him with thy meat for whom Christ died." But now, if we set over against these prohibitory remonstrances the many passages in which the Apostle enjoins the Evangelists, in every variety of phrase, and in words of the utmost force, to contend for the essential verities of the faith, such as, " war a good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience ;" " take heed unto thyself and unto the doctrine ; con- tinue in them ;" " keep that which is committed to thy trust ;" "hold fast the form of sound words in faith and love, which is in Christ Jesus ;" and more deci- sively still, in reference to our present subject, "Holding fast the faithful word, according to my teaching, that he may be able both to exhort by sound doctrine, and to convince the gainsayers," adding, "For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision, whose mouths must be stopped" (not, it is evident, by the mere force of authority, but by argument), "who sub- vert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake." " Wherefore, convince THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 295 them" (by cutting away all their false grounds), " that they may be sound in the faith ; not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men that turn from the truth," we must come to the conclusion that there are points, and these the great fundamental doctrines of the Christian system such as the divi- nity of the Saviour ; the personality of the Holy Ghost; the integrity and sufficiency of the Scriptures, apart from any traditions, to teach all that is necessary to salvation ; their divine inspiration ; the total cor- ruption and helplessness of human nature ; the necessity of repentance and the new birth ; the free- ness of justification through faith, without the works of the law ; the spirituality of Christian worship, as opposed both to ritual observances and to Romish idolatries ; the doctrine of one Mediator ; of the two Sacraments, and of their benefits when accompanied with faith in the recipients; of good works, not as co- ordinate with, but as necessarily consequent upon faith in the justified; of charity as the end of the command- ment; of the resurrection from the dead; and of eternal judgment which must be insisted upon, and if assailed, vindicated by the Christian teacher, in the close engagement of actual Controversy. When a victory has to be won, there must be the clashing of the arms of the combatants. The general object of Controversy may be defined to be, to ascertain, to defend, and to settle truth upon an immovable basis. This, however, is the abstract view of it. In relation to persons, its object, as we 296 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. have seen, and where rightly managed, its effect will be to convince. It will be observed that we have all along gone upon the assumption that with Controversy, or argumentative disputation in defence of the truth, is to be united charity. If this be not the spirit of it, it can be no matter of surprise if it fails (whatever else it may effect) to convince. It is indeed a truth never to be forgotten, that " the wrath of man work- eth not the righteousness of God." If Controversy take the form of angry altercation, or of fierce and fiery contention and insult, it may wound, but it will never heal. The sword of Truth cannot be too sharp, but it must be oiled to enter smoothly. If it irritates it will only kindle the burning fever of resentment, and this will issue in stubborn opposition. Men, ex- cept indeed those who are monomaniacs, will submit to be calmly reasoned out of a false opinion, but they will not be rudely driven out of it. To attempt to force conviction, looks too much like the spirit of persecution ever to succeed. This has been the ill- judged mistake too often made by the Church, and never was any mistake more disastrous in its conse- quences. It has manufactured martyrs out of obsti- nacy, and transferred all the honours of moral heroism from the right to the wrong side of the question ; while it has gathered numbers of fresh converts to superstition and falsehood from the ranks of the sympathetic and the kind-hearted, who ought to have been enlisted (and would have been enlisted under right generalship) under the banners of Truth. It is THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 297 not, then, to Controversy under its offensive form of personal or party contention, we can ascribe the power to convince ; but Controversy when carried on in the pure love of Truth, and under the presidentship of Charity. The materials of the temple in which the image of Truth stands enshrined may be built of the hard-pointed stones of argument ; but the face of the image itself must beam with the smiles of genuine kindness, in order for it to win and assert for Truth her rightful dominion over mankind. Viewed, however, even in its most forbidding fea- tures of deformity, it cannot be denied that Controversy wields a mighty power for the accomplishment of what we have defined to be its general ends. It has put to flight, and cleared away, thousands of baseless theories and false opinions, which once brooded over and darkened the regions of humanity. No truth, indeed, of any importance, such is the dimness of our moral condition, has ever been ascertained and established without much conflict and Controversy; and even then it has often taken ages to arrive at such certainty about it as to place it beyond all dispute. As storms and hurricanes clear the atmo- sphere, so the sun of Truth gets clear shining through the dissipating power of Controversy. Truth is elicited by the collision of opinions, as fire from the striking together of flints. In every subject, in politics, in ethics, in law, in medicine, and in phy- sical science, quite as much as in theology, Contro- versy it is that eliminates and establishes Truth. u 298 THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. Christianity itself was planted, and has grown up, amidst storms. Controversial discussion has ever been favourable to it ; so much so, that it has never retained its purity, nor made any solid advances, but where that has been allowed. To that, beyond a doubt, it owes its chief, its brightest conquests. To be satisfied of the force of Controversy, we have only to call to mind what it has achieved. It has exploded the false systems which once held rule both in Philosophy and Religion ; it has dissipated the moral darkness which for ages hung over the whole of Christendom ; it has laid open the wide universe to the free explorings of Science; it has banished deformities from the gallery of Art ; it has broken off the chain of Popery and Tyranny, and won for us our glorious Magna Charta of civil and religious freedom; it has shivered to atoms the pretensions of despotic power ; it has burnt up persecution, so to speak, in its own fire ; it has wrenched off the manacles of man-degrading bondage from the slave ; it has vin- dicated equal justice for all classes; it has secured protection for the weakest, provision for the poorest of our country's population ; it has inscribed upon the doors of all our institutions of charity the magic word Liberty ; it has changed a land once ill -cultivated, and covered with morasses and dark monastic shades, into a lovely and lightsome scene of good order and beauty ; it has cradled, by its rough rocking, our national energies into manly strength ; it has raised us into the erect position of independence; it has THE FORCE OF CONTROVERSY. 299 forced Law to enrobe itself in the pure ermine of its equity; above all, it has rescued Truth from the down-treading of Error, and enthroned Her in Her own bright, serene, rightful majesty, as the only guide to man, the Pharos tower to all the nations of the earth, the great saviour of the lost ; in fine, it is to Controversy may be traced the whole of Truth's Triumphs. END OF THE ESSAYS. U 2 terlusion. THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. AGAIN the night-shades had gathered, and the hour for " tired Nature's sweet restorer," to shed his balmy influence afresh, returned. Wearied by the long contest which he had waged with the great seven-headed serpent, our Dreamer lay himself down again to rest not now upon a pillow where Subtilty slumbered unsuspected, but where Security reposed in quiet confidence. Soon he fell into a sound sleep ; and soundly did he continue to sleep till near the dawn of the returning day. What time the morning began to break over the distant mountains in deepen- ing flushes of reddening light, and to pierce up into the sky in rays of arrowy brightness, the heavy va- pours of sleep cleared gradually away from his re- freshed spirit, like mists before the rising sun ; and while in that dreamy state, half waking, half sleeping, his mind was anon at work frisking through the regions of fancy, wrought upon now not by the un- wholesome warmth of an artificial excitement, but by returning sober consciousness, presenting images of the real. Another vision visits him. Gentle reader, mark its form, and learn its moral. THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 301' As waking dreams usually turn upon objects with which the thoughts have recently been familiar, he fancies, naturally enough, that he sees the temple, into which he had lately entered, uprising again before him. It looks outwardly very much as when last it broke upon his view. He imagines he again enters it, when, lo, such is the alteration which it has undergone within, that he exclaims aloud in his sleep, " Oh, how changed ! " He is now struck, not by its mystic bewildering variety of objects, but at its pure ungarnished simplicity. The numberless images and pictures of saints and angels peering out from niche and wall, from boss and corbel, which, when he last trod its aisles, acted with such confusing, awe-awaking power upon his animal senses, had all disappeared from the noble edifice. No magic many- coloured lights now streamed, and waved, and danced upon its pavement, to distract his thoughts. The windows have been so changed as to let in the pure light of heaven, slightly shaded only to soften it down to suit man's feeble eyesight. No flitting shadows, nor ghost-lfce shapes, of men or things of unearthly aspect, cross his vision to disturb his mental compo- sure. Self-possessed, he now surveys the place. The architectural ornaments of the building (for it still has some ornaments) are all of that flowery unde- fined kind, taken from the pattern of Nature, which are at once pure, simple, unimposing. The whole interior, he observes, is thrown perfectly open. The view is everywhere unobstructed. This gives it an 302 THE RjsvEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. appearance more vast and truly magnificent than be- fore. There was, indeed, a sort of pure sublimity about it, which, seemed to say, as far as anything sen- sible can say, " The Being who is worshipped here is a Spirit ; who dwells in that vast temple of the uni- verse, whose only visible walls are light." The effect produced upon his mind now was not of an oppressive but of an expanding character. With lightened step and uplifted heart he moves towards the part where, he remembers, the congregation was gathered. The sound of singing again breaks upon his ear. But the harmony now, he notes, is not that of the pealing organ and varied anthem, but only that of simple voices ; yet is it so spiritually sweet, that his truth- enlightened soul at once mounts with it, not in the sensuous raptures of excited feeling, but in the pure elevation of the spirit direct towards that great in- visible Being who dwelleth not in temples made with hands, but in the high and holy place of eternity. Scarcely conscious of the advance of his own foot- steps, so completely is his soul, rapt away from the body, he finds himself immediately in the^nidst of the worshippers, and joining in their praises. The sing- ing ended, the scene changes. He sees a preacher ascend the pulpit as before, but he is not the same. With the change which the aspect of the interior has undergone, a change has taken place in the character of the minister. There stands before him now a " man of God : " " the best of books was in his hand, the law of truth was written upon his lips, the world was THE RKVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 303 behind his back," a vast multitude of people of both sexes, and of all ages, was before his face, and he looked like one who pleaded with men concerning matters of life and death. His manner was earnest, but unstudied his countenance serious, but uncon- strained. Whenever he used action, it was evidently from the impulse of feeling at the moment. His whole bearing, indeed, might be described in that one word, " naturalness." Having first offered up a short prayer with great spiritual fervour, he gave out for his text this passage from the writings of St. Paul, upon which, as our Dreamer heard it, he delivered the following discourse : " This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all ac- ceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners.' 9 - I Timothy i. 15. "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" was the agitated question of the awakened jailor at Philippi, when startled out of his slumbers by an earthquake. This is the most important question which any living man can possibly ask. It is the question upon which hinges an eternity of happiness or of misery. But where can we find an answer to this question ? No- where but in that blessed book which announces the message of Heaven's mercy to man, and unfolds to us the counsels, and purposes, and accomplished acts of the Most High. In the inspired Scriptures, and in the inspired Scriptures alone, find we that clear, authentic, and duly accredited information on this 304 THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. point (and on all other points touching the means and method of our salvation) upon which we can, with any feeling of certainty, rely. To learn that we are sinful creatures, we have only to look inwardly upon what goes on in our own hearts, as compared with the law of God. That guilt is felt to attach to all men is evidenced by the universal prevalence of the offering of sacrifice, under some form or other, to atone for it : which yet, in the absence of Revelation, can bring no assured peace to the troubled mind. We have but to glance over the pages of our own past history to discover that we have ourselves been actual transgressors. If we ask Conscience what awaits us, Conscience replies, " Thou hast sinned, and must die." But no man living or dead, no book, nor school, nor teacher, nor mere human authority of any kind, can tell us how we may be saved. We have had sayings of philosophers, but they have deceived us. We have had traditions of our fathers, but they have misled us. We have had the admired systems of moralists, but they have broken' down under us. We have had theories, and reasonings, and guesses of the wise, and writings of the learned, and sage maxims, and methods various and of the most skilful device, for rectifying the evils of our fallen condition ; but none of them have borne the seal of infallible truth ; none of them have given us solid hope ; none of them have scattered our dark- ness, and lightened our eyes with the light of life. If, perplexed with the obscure and contradictory THE RKYEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 305 opinions of men, we have turned to " Great Nature," what has Nature answered ? When we have looked up inquiringly at the Heavens, as they have seemed to look down thoughtfully upon us at night with their myriad starry eyes, they have answered us only by a dread unbroken silence. When we have asked of the Earth, the Earth has responded only in a deep- heaved groan. When we have said hopefully to the Sea, as it lay smooth and smiling in the calm, " Is there peace to be obtained in any way for guilty man with his God ? " the Sea has replied only by cresting itself into the terrific shape of the storm. When we have looked mutely at the living creatures around us, they have met our mute looks only by fleeing from our presence. When we have knocked lastly at the door of Death, Death has echoed no answer. Thus silence deep, awful, mysterious silence, has reigned through all nature, and over all men, upon the point most important of all for man to know How may a lost sinner be saved ? But can it be for a moment supposed, is it at all likely that our Maker would leave us for ever in this distressing uncertainty ? Is it not reasonable to expect that he would in some intelligible way reveal his will to those of his creatures whom he has made capable of understanding it, and who are the subjects of such a truly godly concern ? Is it not natural to assume that, as he has given to man the power of communicating his thoughts by articulate sounds to his fellow man, so he would, in the same mode, express 306 THE RKVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. his own, to be conveyed, as all other knowledge is, from one generation to another, in a written form ? He that made the tongue, shall he not speak ? He that teacheth man knowledge, shall not he make known ? Yes, verily, God hath spoken : let all the earth hear. He has broken the silence, in itself so frightful, of the universe, to satisfy the anxious in- quirings of his creatures ; and not only has he spoken, but, that his words might remain to be a sure guide to all ages, he has caused them to be written in a book, by inspired men ; and among all these words there is none more suited to the felt necessities of our condition, there is none more deserving of our thorough confidence, there is none more pregnant with universal consolation than those of our text, " This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners." Now it is to this statement of Holy Scripture, which bespeaks its own truth and title to world -wide acceptance, and in which, in the simplest form of words, we have the whole Gospel brought before us in an epitome, who Christ was, for what end he came into our world, our own implied character, and the glorious result of his coming to them who receive him, I would now draw your attention. There are in the text two main points worthy of our special nbtice : I. The fact stated, that " Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners;" and II. What the Apostle asserts in regard to this statement, namely, that " This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation." THE RE VEIL, OR BREAM DISPERSED. 307 I. Notice the fact stated, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners. In this statement it is obviously assumed that he existed before he came and sojourned on this earth among men. If we were told that some new planet or star had just made its appearance among the stars of our system, our na- tural assumption from this would be, not that it was then first created when it first appeared, but only that it then came for the first time within that part of space which is visible to us. But, in the case before us, the ground for such an assumption is still stronger ; for here Christ is spoken of as having come into our world for a specific, determined purpose, namely, " to save sinners ;" and therefore he must have existed in distinct personal consciousness before to have formed that purpose. If we heard it said of any particular man that he came into England, we should know beyond question that he dwelt in some other region before Se came here. This is not the way in which we usually describe a mere birth ; and besides, in birth, the person is altogether passive ; whereas, in the text, Christ's coming is spoken of as an act of his own. It is clear, then, that he existed before in some other region, if not under some other form. " He that should come" was, too, you will remember, one of the modes of description used by the Jews when speaking of Him. His coming had been long ex- pected, as a thing from the first foretold. It was darkly hinted in that promise to our offending and sorrowing parents, " The seed of the woman shall 308 THE RE VEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED; bruise the serpent's head." Prophet after prophet predicted it ; the sacrifices and religious ceremonies of the Jews prefigured it ; holy men of faith waited for it ; the angels of heaven. announced it when it had taken place. " In the fulness of the time," as the Apostle elsewhere says, " God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons." From this passage of Scrip- ture a clear, full light is thrown upon our text, arid we learn who Christ was before he came into our world. He was God's Son. This is implied, also, in his name Jesus, which means God the Saviour. Thus we gather his true and proper divinity. He was indeed the everlasting Son of the Father, equal with him in majesty, as he was equal with him in eternity. " In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God ; and the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us." " I come forth from the Father," is his own declaration, " and am come into the world." 2. Notice next, To what place he came. " He came into the world" From whence he came, you need not be told. As the Son of God, he must have come from heaven. Now to leave heaven, and to come into such a world as this a world of sin and of sinners (for that is what is usually meant by the " world " in Scripture) involves such amazing love, and con- descension, and self-sacrifice on his part, as almost THE REVE1L, OK DREAM DISPERSED. 309 baffles belief; and yet are we assured, upon an au- thority that cannot be doubted, that it is even true. Christ so loved our fallen race that, to save us, he humbled himself, and stooped to our condition. In so doing, he left a world of majesty, in which he had heretofore dwelt, for one of meanness ; a world of blessedness for one of suffering ; a world of purity for one of pollution. In his transit he made an exchange of the ineffable glory of Deity, and the society of holy angels, and the praises of cherubim and seraphim, and the splendours of heaven's eternal palaces, for the damp and distant regions of banishment, and the company of the ungodly, and the curses and contra- dictions of sinners against himself, and the outcast condition of the despised and rejected of men, who had not even where to lay his head. Here was indeed a new thing and a wondrous, that he who was " the brightness of the Father's glory, and the express image of his person," dwelling with him in light and bliss unutterable, should leave the bright precincts of heaven's golden mansions, to come and tabernacle for a time in this world of darkness, and dreariness, and degradation. We run to view if some new star has appeared ; we hasten to gaze if some distinguished individual has arrived from a distant country among us. 0, surely here is an event worthy to attract the attention of all, that the Son of God came into our world to dwell among us as one of our race, and, in our nature to suffer and die, that we might be saved. " In this the love of God was manifested, 310 THE REVEIL, Oil DREAM DISPERSED. that he sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him." 3. Notice, thirdly, the end for which he came, " to save sinners.' 1 This was the direct design of his coming ; this was the prime end to be accomplished by it. It was not merely to set us an example, as a Teacher, according to the Socinians' theory, but it was to suffer for us as a Saviour. He had the name Jesus given to him, as the Evangelist informs us, for this very reason ; " for he shall save his people from their sins." Example alone would not save. To show a man how to swim is not the same thing as to rescue him when sinking. It is astonishing how any, with this declaration of their Bibles before them, can rest in the idea that Christ came only to teach ; and to leave us an example. This, indeed, was one end for which he came, but it was not the main end. He had a nobler, because a more compassionate object in view. He saw that we were perishing, and he fled to our relief. Had he brought into our world, indeed, only that luminous wisdom with which he enlightened it; had he left behind him only the footsteps of his own pure and spotless example, he would have been a great benefactor : but this would not have met the deep necessities of our fallen condi- tion, which, doubtless, he knew. This alone, so far from lifting us up out of our lost estate, and inspiring us with confidence and hope, would only have plunged us into deeper despair in revealing to us by contrast our own vileness and utter helplessness, while, by the THE RKVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 311 heavier condemnation it would have laid upon our guilty consciences, it would have enshrouded our future in a denser gloom. What we .chiefly wanted to know was, how we might be freed from guilt, washed, and made clean from the pollution of sin. This his own expiatory death, as our substitute, made clear. " He put away sin by the sacrifice of himself." " He who knew no sin, was made sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." Being God as well as man, his Deity gave an infinite value to his sacrifice, while his humanity rendered him capable of suffering in our place. To accomplish our redemption was the chief end for which he died. If he performed, as he did, wondrous miracles, it was only to prove himself to be the promised Messiah ; if he enforced the law of God, both by precept and example, to the very strictest degree, it was only the more effectually to convince us of our sin ; if he ful- filled all righteousness in his own person, it was only to work out a righteousness for us commensurate with all the demands of the Law, that thereby we might be justified ; if he suffered even to the death of the cross, it was solely for this purpose, that we might be delivered from death. " He gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time." In a word, the one grand end for which he came into the world was, as stated in our text, " to save sinners." Now, herein we see strongly implied, what is our own character and moral condition. We are sinners ; and not only so, but lost sinners ; for if we were not 312 THE REVE1L, OR DREAM DISPERSED. lost, we could not need to be saved. Every man who breathes the breath of this world, or ever has breathed it, is a sinner. " All we, like sheep, have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way." " There is none righteous ; no, not one." "All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God." Now, what is involved in this fact? To be a sinner, is to be under a sentence of condemnation ; and not only so, but to be morally disabled from restoring himself to righteousness. Such being our condition, a Saviour, a super- human Saviour, was absolutely needed ; and such a Saviour, we have already shewn, was sent. From the greatness of the remedy provided, we might, indeed, infer the greatness of our misery, our own utterly lost and helpless estate. The costly machinery of the Gospel would never have been constructed (for the Almighty never wastefully expends his power), had it not been necessary for the working out of our resto- ration. The Son of God, we may be sure, would never have left the heights of celestial bliss and glory to come into our world, had not our rescue from ruin demanded it. There were creatures more nearly allied to us, who would have been ready and willing to help us, had it been in their power. The holy angels, those spirits of fire, burning with love, would have flown to our aid unbidden. Our fellow- men would succour us, if aught they can do would save. Which of us would not rush, at any moment, to snatch a person from the flames, or to rescue a THE II ri VEIL, OR DREA.M DISPERSED. 313 drowning man from a watery grave ? But our ruin through sin was beyond all creature recovery. " No man could redeem his brother, so that he must let that alone for ever." " I looked," says the Almighty by the prophet, " and there was none to help, and I wondered that there was no intercessor ; therefore my own arm brought salvation." In this, further, we see implied the exceeding great value of the human soul. Our souls, though little appreciated by ourselves, are precious in God's sight. Think not, brethren, that the eternal Son of God would have exchanged the pure regions of heaven for this polluted earth to sojourn and suffer among us for any trifling object for anything which he did not esteem of surpassing preciousness. We love our own, and will even risk our own lives to save them. Shall God be less loving to those who are emphatically his offspring ? He best knows the value of human souls, for he made them. The whole world is not to be compared with one single soul in worth, for it is one of Christ's own deep-thoughted remarks, " What shall it profit a man, though he gain the whole world, if he lose his own soul ; or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?'* When he came, then, into our world, he came not for such comparatively insignificant, because temporary objects, as the establishment of empires, and the ruling of states ; he came not, as the Jews vainly fancied he would come, to revive national power and grandeur ; nor did he come merely to advance the knowledge 314 THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. and science which elevate and adorn human society (objects which we are apt to think of the highest interest) ; but he came for a far more benevolent and enduring purpose he came " to bring life and immor- tality to light" he came to save the lost. And now let me explain somewhat more fully what Christ has done to save us, and how his salva- tion is to be made ours. " Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures." Such is the statement of the Apostle. It was necessary, it seems, that an atonement should be made for man's sins before he could be restored to the Divine favour. " Die He or Justice must." The law of God, whose sentence was, "the soul that sinneth shall die," had been violated ; its penalty had been incurred by man. The truth of God, and the justice of God, were pledged to carry into execution this sentence, unless in some way satisfaction could be made to the righteous demands of the law, and a channel opened for the safe exercise of mercy. If sin were allowed to go altogether unpunished, or pardoned without the payment of any penalty, the honour of God's moral government would have been endangered, the equities of Heaven laid open to question. Some one in man's nature, therefore, must suffer to satisfy for man's sin. He must be some one, too, of infinite dignity, or he could not satisfy for the sins of all, and make reparation for offences against Heaven's infinite Majesty, or establish a title, through his own merits, to eternal glory. To meet these exigencies of our THE RrfVEIL, OR DREAil DISPERSED. 15 condition it was, that the Son of God himself took upon him our nature, wrought out a perfect righteous- ness, and at last died as a sacrifice, in compliance- with the requirements of the law of his Father. Thus satisfaction was made for the sins of the whole world. Thus, too, the law of God was magnified and made honourable, his justice was awfully vindicated, his mercy magnificently displayed, and pardon and righteousness are proffered through Christ to the sinner. " Him hath God set forth to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood." And now, whoever believes with the heart and confesses with the mouth the Lord Jesus, whoever casts himself penitently and trustfully upon his divine sacrifice for sin, is "justified from all things from which he could not be justified by the law of Moses" " being justified freely by God's grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." Being delivered, in short, from condemnation, he is made an adopted child of God, and has a title given him, which constitutes him an heir of glory. Moreover, by this same act of his, in dying for us, and thereby atoning for our sins, Christ purchased for us the gift or restoration of the Divine Spirit, to renew us again unto holiness, in order that we might be qualified for happiness. Sin had not only closed the door against, but it had disqualified us for the pure delights of Paradise. We required to be delivered not only from deserved condemnation, but from inborn pollution from the power of sin as well as its guilt. The heart needed to be washed, sanctified, renewed, 316 THE RKVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. before there could be any meetness or capability in man for the service or enjoyment of God. Heaven, though purchased, would be no heaven to a mind that was not first made heavenly. By nature we are all carnal, sold under sin. The whole inner man, then, requires to be changed. To effect this, Christ, who came to save us, sends his Holy Spirit into the hearts of men, first to convince them of sin ; then to teach them true wisdom, by revealing to them Christ as a Saviour suitable to them and every way sufficient (" He shall take of mine and show it unto you") ; and then, finally, to lead them to Christ as " exalted to be both a Prince and a Saviour, to give repentance," or a change of mind, " and forgiveness of sins." The faith of Christ purifies the heart from the guilt of past sin ; and the Holy Spirit, being in the heart of the believer, what Christ promised, as a well of water, ever welling forth its pure streams, carries on the process of purifying till it sanctifies the man wholly, and he becomes meet for the inheritance of the saints in light, to which he is at length exalted by his Divine Redeemer, " being delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God." Thus, then, is verified to the full the Apostle's statement, that Christ is "of God made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and re- demption." You see then, brethren, now fully what Christ has done to save you, and also how his salvation is to be made yours. It is by faith in the Saviour : ^ Believe THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 317 in the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved." It is by submitting yourselves to his righteousness, and being made partakers of his Spirit. A change of heart must be wrought in you, through the power of the Holy Ghost. " Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." " If any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his." Here we have set forth the true agencies that are efficient of man's salvation. But it is nowhere said in the Scriptures (and mark this well), Believe in the Church, and thou shalt be saved make confession to the priest, and thou shalt be pardoned -go through a course of severe self- torturing services, and thou shalt become righteous receive the sacraments only, and thou shalt be sanc- tified. No, rather it is, Believe in Christ; repent; obey the Gospel. The Church, and the sacraments, and even the preaching of the word, are only instru- mental means of salvation moral, and not physical agencies efficient of themselves ; and to look directly to them, or to rest in them, is to come short of the salvation that is in Christ Jesus. They are useful as helps in the way to life ; most dangerous when made objects of trust. " Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised" (that is, expecting through that, and by parity of reason through any other external ordinance, to be saved), " Christ shall profit you nothing. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law ; ye are fallen from grace. For we through the Spirit wait for 318 THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. the hope of righteousness by faith." It is the principle here opposed that we have to guard against, and not compliance with any particular ordinance. This prin- ciple may creep in under the Christian, even as it did under the Legal dispensation. On this point let us strive to get a clear understanding. The Church was instituted, not to be the giver of grace to you, but only to gather you into one com- munion ; the clergy are appointed to minister to you, not to mediate for you ; sacraments are ordained to be the signs and seals of God's grace and good will towards you and means whereby, through faith, you may receive it, and be assured of it ; but salvation it- self is to be obtained neither through the Church, nor through the priest, nor through sacraments, nor through any moralities or observances of our own, but through each man's direct personal faith in the Saviour that true faith which apprehends Christ as " the end of the law for righteousness to every one that belie veth " which " works by love " which " overcomes the world," and brings forth in the life those " fruits of righteousness, which are by J.esus Christ unto the praise and glory of God." The mistake which men commonly make in this matter is, to suppose that they must perform certain works of obedience in order to be worthy to be saved. The enlightened believer obeys because he is saved not obeys in order to be saved. Good works are the fruits of faith, and not the causes meritorious of the bestow- ment of grace. They are neither co-ordinate with THE RE VEIL, OK DREAM DISPERSED. 319 faith, nor are they co-efficients with faith, in the matter of our salvation, but only the consequents and resultant effects of faith. Even the good centurion Cornelius, who, we are told, " gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway," knew of the preaching of peace by Jesus Christ,* and was in heart a believer, though he knew not, till Peter was sent to inform him, of his full privileges as a believing Christian. His prayers and alms went up for a " memorial" only, not for a merit before God. Jesus is both the author and finisher of our faith. No other righteousness but his is required, or can be accepted, for our justification. No other agent but his own Holy Spirit can be efficient to our sanctification : and true religion is that which emanates from his opera- tion within, not that which is produced by the action of anything from without it is subjective and spiritual not objective, merely, and emotional. In its essence it consists of two things love to God, and love to man and it shows itself chiefly in acts of affiance in the one, and of unconquerable kindness towards the other. When these effects have been produced in a man, then may it be safely affirmed of him that he has so believed in Christ as to be saved. Ask yourselves then, brethren, here, each one the question Have I thus believed in Christ? Am I thus saved ? Salvation is a thing not merely to be looked for in the future, but realised now. "To us who are saved," says the Apostle, " the preaching of * See Acts x. 37. 320 THE RKVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. the cross is the power of God." Again, " Who hath saved us, and called us with a holy calling ;" "not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost." Now has this been realised by you ? Have you been brought to perceive that you are condemned by the law that your own righteous- nesses are all but as filthy rags that you have no power to do anything spiritually good of your- self in a word, that your natural condition is that of one who is fallen, ruined, lost ? If this be the case with you, then we bid you to look believingly unto Jesus : " Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world," and gather comfort. Go at once to Him who is mighty to save, penitent yet believing ; appeal in his name directly to the Father ; ask him to give you life through, and for the sake of his dear Son ; and your sins shall be forgiven you ; your heart shall be turned, and the kingdom of God, which is " righteousness, joy, and peace in the Holy Ghost," shall be established in you ; you shall "dwell in God and God in you;" and when death comes to strike off your mortal fetters, you shall be rapt away to the presence of him " whom, having not seen, you have loved," to prove, by your own glorified experience, the truth of the statement that "Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners." But perhaps some of you will reply, " I have been too great a sinner ever to be saved." Then there is something immediately connected with our text that THE RriVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 321 closes at once the door against this, your despairing conclusion. St. Paul had been, as he tells us, and as we know from his recorded actions, of sinners the chief : and yet Christ saved him. He mentions this very fact as a proof the strongest possible proof of what he states, that " Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners" Why, then, should you de- spair ? Why should you write " there is no hope " against your own name ? Grant that you have been a great offender; grant that your sins are of the deepest dye ; grant that you have brought yourself into such a state of moral helplessness that you are in yourself wholly lost ; then is Christ's great salva- tion exactly suited to your condition. " He," it is written, " is able to save to the uttermost all who come unto God by him." Every sincere penitent thinks himself to be " of sinners the chief." It is not our feeling ourselves to have been great sinners that should keep any of us back from coming to Christ. If we were not sinners we should not stand in that predicament in which his interposition was required. If we felt not, and were not ready to confess ourselves sinners, he would not deign to save us. " I came," he says, "not to call the righteous" those who think themselves so " but sinners to repentance." Again, " The Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost." Be your moral state, then, what it may ; however aggravated your guilt ; however long- standing your alienations from God ; however provok- ing your past acts ; however deeply sinful your con- 322 THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. tracted habits ; still this is the glorious announcement that we are authorised to make to you oh, hear ye it and believe that " Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners." II. The second special point which we proposed to notice was, what the Apostle asserts in regard to this statement, namely, that " This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation. 1 ' First, then, this is a "faithful saying" a saying that is every way worthy of belief, worthy of belief for its truth; worthy of belief for the strong confirma- tions that have been given of it ; worthy of belief for the rich assurance and comfort which it brings to the mind. Of few other sayings can this be asserted. Many things which are said cannot be relied on : there is no truth in them ; but this is truth itself. The world is full of lies, of false reports, false systems, false religions. But the very existence of so many counterfeits is itself evidence that there exists some- where genuine coin. If Christianity be not true, we might boldly demand, what system of religion is ? But Christianity we know is true. God has invested it with evidences of every kind. Christ was pointed out by prophecy ages before he came into our world ; when he appeared he was seen exactly to correspond with the types which foreshadowed him ; he wrought the most stupendous miracles in proof of his divine mission ; his life was so pure and perfect that none could gainsay his heavenly character ; his death was marked by such marvels as to force a confession, that THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 323 he was indeed the Son of God, even from his enemies ; by his resurrection from the grave on the third day he set the seal of immortality to the truth of his pre- tensions ; by his visible ascension into heaven he placed his headship over all beyond doubt or question ; and by the descent of the Holy Ghost, according to his promise, to give effect to his word, he convinced his stoutest opposers ; while, by the rapid spread of Christianity, without the aid of human power, its triumph over the gigantic systems of Hea- thenism, and its continuance to this day, we have standing evidence of the strongest kind to its divine origin. Verily may we say that if men believe not upon these evidences, neither would they believe though one rose from the dead. Nor is this all. A vast variety of other evidences crowd in upon us from every side. From the Gospel narrative itself, from the multitude of undesigned coincidences to be found in the different parts of the word, and from the testimonies of collateral history, it is proved to the certainty of a moral demonstration that Jesus Christ is " the faithful and true Witness," that the Bible is the very truth of God. In fine, there is no truth of a historical nature, or which rests upon moral evidence alone, which offers more solid ground- work than this for our faith. But there is yet another kind of evidence stronger even than this, at least to individuals, the evidence of experience. This was what St. Paul had. The Gospel had proved itself to be to him the " power of God unto 324 THE RE" VEIL, OR DREA.M DISPERSED. salvation." It had subdued his proud heart, which nothing else could subdue ; it had emptied his self- righteous heart, which nothing else could empty ; it had softened his hard injurious heart, which nothing else could soften ; it had silenced his blaspheming tongue, and stayed his persecuting hand ; it had opened his blind eyes, and poured the balm of con- solation into his terror-stricken spirit ; it had changed him into an humble, and transformed him into a holy, and constrained him to become an unselfish, devoted, Christ-loving man, and thus he had self- evidencing proof of the truth of the Gospel. He had what St. John calls " the witness in himself." He speaks in the text, you will observe, as one who knew, and was personally persuaded of the truth of what he stated. " I am sure," he seems to say, " that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, because he has saved me" Now this is evidence which all may have, the poorest and most illiterate as well as the wisest and most learned. And this is evidence which, when possessed, brings infinitely stronger conviction to the mind than any other a conviction which all the sophistry of sceptics can never shake or overthrow. All the arguments in the world will not be able to convince that man, that the sun does not shine, who is basking in its beams, and feels its warmth. Similar is the force of the evidence of experience to the Gospel's sanctifying and consoling power. This evidence has sustained thousands, when passing THE RKVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 325 through the terrific ordeal of dissolution, enabling them to say with Job : " I know that my Redeemer liveth, and shall stand at the latter day upon the earth ; and though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God;" or with the Apostle, " I know in whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.'* And this being so, it follows that the saying " that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners," is "a faithful saying''' 2. Further, the Apostle asserts that this saying is " worthy of ail acceptation ;" that is, as our Church renders it, " worthy to be received of all men." This again can be affirmed of very few sayings. Most of the things that we hear said, are not worth a moment's attention from any one. Some of them are essentially bad, and had better not be heard at all ; some are trifling, and a waste of time to listen to ; some are of a limited interest, and concern but a few. But this is universally important this con- cerns all men young or old, rich or poor, learned or unlearned, Barbarian, Scythian, bond or free. It concerns you, brethren, it concerns me ; it con- cerns your children, it concerns mine; it concerns our fellow-countrymen, it concerns the world; it concerns every man living without exception, and why ? because all are sinners, and because " there is no other name under heaven given among men whereby we can be saved, but the name of Jesus 326 THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. Christ.'* Through faith in him, the most guilty of us may be saved: without faith in him, the least guilty must perish. How infinitely important, then, is it that we should all give a cordial, believing acceptance to this saying ! But is it not the fact, that most of us let other things interest us far more. It matters not how worthless or trifling things may be, they are caught at because they serve to fill up the void places of a craving restless mind. How much more eagerly, for example, will men listen to the news of the day, or the tattle of the town, or the occurrences in a far off country (things in which they have no more direct interest than the inhabitants of some distant planet), while to the Gospel, though it involves their eternal interests, and touches the very life of their souls, they give only the most languid attention. " Who hath believed our report, and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed ?" And yet the Gospel commends itself to, and therefore ought to win the acceptance of, every one of us. It is a remedy exactly suited to our malady ; it meets our one great universal necessity; it provides salvation for the lost. " Christ crucified" this is " the grand catholicon," this is the balm of Gilead which will heal every one's wound, this is the universal specific for curing men's souls, and restoring them to immortal health. Without this, received and applied by faith, we must die eternally. But only receive this into the heart trustfully and lovingly, embrace the truth, that " Christ Jesus came into the THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 327 world to save sinners," with the full acceptance both of your understandings and your affections, and at once you pass from death unto life, to be eternally saved ; this, therefore, is a saying " worthy of all acceptation" " I endure all things for the elect's sake," says the devoted Apostle, " that they may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus, with eternal glory." Eter- nal glory! what a magnificent prospect does this expression open up before us ! While we meditate upon it, we seem to see looming upon us in the dis- tant heavens, like the tops of sunlit mountains in the morning, the pinnacles of the celestial city, whose walls are of jasper and of gold; glittering hosts appear to be marching to and fro in triumphal pro- cession; symphonies of more than mortal music float in softened cadence on our ear ; as we draw near to behold, brighter and brighter scenes break upon our view ; palace rising above palace, throne above throne, each surpassing the other in splendour ; while diadems of the most dazzling jewellery hang sus- pended aloft, ready prepared for those that shall be saved. Fellow immortals! arise, and grasp the Gospel's eternal glories. This, this, is the estate which shall which shall shall what ? be yours ? * Startled out of his sleep by the suddenness and rising emphasis of this question, our Dreamer awakes, : The discourse must be supposed to have pro- ceeded as follows : " That is the very question which we wish you to press for an answer to at the door of 328 THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. springs up, and, behold, it is day.* The sun has already mounted above the horizon, and is darting your own hearts. Witt it ever be yours? Most assuredly not, unless you yield the most thorough, hearty, grateful acceptance to this saying that 6 Christ Jesus came into the world to save s inners.' " Finally, then, brethren, let me urge upon you the inquiry, Have you thus accepted the Apostle's assurance ? Have you yielded your full affiance to the testimony of Scripture ? Have you ever gone to Christ as a sinner, and received him as a Saviour? If you have not, fearful is your condition : for, ' He that belie veth on the Son hath everlasting life : and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life ; but the wrath of God abideth on him.' Reject the offered salvation of the Gospel, and you die in your sins; accept it, and you are for ever saved for this is the blessed testimony of our text, that ' Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners.' " Let each and all, then, give acceptance to this saying; treasure it up in your hearts as a golden treasure; carry it in your bosoms as a locket of Heaven's love ; keep it ever in your minds as your own beloved Saviour's legacy of hope to the lost." * We may note here, what it would have broken the thread of our narrative to have noted before, that during the delivery of this discourse, he had been moved to tears in his sleep had poured out the confessions of penitence had been gladdened into the joys of a lively faith had realised the sense of reconciliation with God, and arose up a new man. The phantasies of superstition, and the terrors of dread, were alike dispersed by what he had heard, and he walked forth a freeman in Heaven's own light. THE REVEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. 329 the bright pure light of the morning over the whole face of the surrounding scenery. He looks forth from his window, and when he looks forth, lo ! he beholds the Happy Valley, just as it had appeared to him in his former vision ere the withering change before described had passed over it ; and he sees it now, not as he saw it then, in a dream, but actually lying under his eyes, a splendid reality. In front, a boundless prospect of beauty spread itself out, and stretched away beyond his utmost view, to excite his admiring gaze. On the right and the left could just be kenned the long range of protective mountains, cloud-crowned, which walled in the valley ; the rivers winding through it glistened like streams of silver in the glowing sun. On the upland steeps trees waved, and flowers bloomed. The scene which greeted his eyes was indeed one of the richest loveliness ; fertility and verdure clothed and adorned the whole land- scape ; flocks and herds were feeding in the pastures ; the birds were chanting their matin song ; many a village spire towered up above all other objects, calmly up-pointing to heaven ; the neat-looking houses were here and there detected, nestling among the trees, by the light, thin, wavy curls of smoke which ascended from them and floated in the air; the cheerful inhabitants were seen just going forth to their daily toil, here Order reigned visible, Industry ploughed, and Plenty smiled. This Happy Valley is henceforth to be our Dreamer's own favoured dwelling-place, so long as he w 330 THE RE VEIL, OR DREAM DISPERSED. shall have to sojourn here below. This he knows, because Providence has here cast his lot; while taught by the word of God to look for a better country, even a heavenly, he regards himself only as a stranger and a pilgrim on the earth. This transitory life he feels to be but the floating bridge which is bearing him, in common with all his race, over from the shores of time to the everlasting resting-places of eternity. Feeling this, he lives rather for the future than the present. Sensible that his condition is as highly privileged as any he can expect to find on earth, he exclaims with thankful- ness, " The lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places ; yea, I have a goodly heritage. I will bless the Lord who hath given me counsel." No restless risings of discontent, or fantastic notions of possible transcen- dental virtue to be attained by urisanctioned modes of life, disquiet his mind, or disturb the even tenor of his way. He looks around but to learn what is his duty, and, finding himself a member of so richly-blessed a community, his conscience tells him that as he is a partaker of its common privileges, he ought to con- tribute his share to its common weal. Energised by the soul -awakening religion of the Gospel as with new powers, like a man awaked from a sleep, or a giant refreshed with wine, behold ! he goes forth at Duty's call to pursue his appointed work (gentle reader, maystthou be he!), with Providence for his protector, the Word of God for his guide, and Heaven for his end. NOTE A. ON HIEROGLYPHICS. MR. RUSKIN says that "one important consequence of our feeling the soul's pre-eminence will be our understanding the soul's language chiefly that great symbolic language of past ages which has now so long been unspoken." But why unspoken, but because it has ceased to be a recognised method of commu- nication. And why again is this, but that with the advance of the human mind there is a correspond- ing improvement in the method of conveying ideas. Men have become more intellectual : they are less de- pendent now than formerly upon sensible symbols to express abstract ideas. Mr. Ruskin refers in particu- lar to the magnificent system of symbolism adopted by the ancient Assyrians, and embodied in the gigantic compound figures which have lately been discovered in the ruins of ancient Nineveh. He thinks that when we come to understand this we shall no longer regard the Greeks and Romans as superior to the Assyrians and Egyptians. But he seems to us to overlook the fact, that in the inadequacy of language, under its then imper- fections, men were obliged, as it were, to resort to less abstract methods of imaging forth the ideal concep- tions of the mind than they are now. The different w 2 332 APPENDIX. methods resorted to at different periods of the world's history, are well explained in the following passage out of the writings of the distinguished Dr. Young : " In the infancy of art and civilisation, mankind appear to have employed mimetic images, or portraits, to represent individual objects, and give notice of events to those at a distance. Thus the Mexicans denoted the arrival of the Spaniards by a rude delinea- tion of a ship, and of a man distinguished by the peculiarities of an European dress. This is what may be called picture writing, or the natural repre- sentation of objects or actions. But these mimetic images, which could convey no idea of time, nor indi- cate any abstract quality or attribute, were totally in- sufficient for the purposes of communicating informa- tion and recording events. Hence conventional signs, sometimes kuriological, and sometimes tropical, were chosen to serve as symbols both of things and thoughts, of objects in nature and ideas of the mind Thus the classifications which take place in all lan- guages, but more especially the tropes and figures which abound in all dialects spoken by nations not yet refined by the highest pitch of civilisation, must have greatly facilitated both the invention and the comprehension of hieroglyphics. In the progress of improvement, then, we have two stages clearly defined : first, picture writing, which consists in the mere representation of events^ or of objects in a state of action with one another ; and, secondly, hieroglyphics, or symbolical writing, which is sometimes kuriological and some- ON HIEROGLYPHICS. 333 times tropical. Encyc. Brit., Art. Hieroglyphics, Sec. 1. It is thus shown that the modes of conveying thought have come under the laws of a progressive science. Are we, then, to go backwards by way of advance, and return to picture -teaching by way of improvement ? But we shall be reminded, perhaps, that all lan- guage is, in point of fact, pictorial. Very true ; but then pictures of thought speak direct to the mind, and not through the dull medium* of the body; they are, therefore, more purely spiritual. Though articulate language is an original gift of God to man, yet it was not formed in its fulness, we must remember, at once. Though the power was of God, its improvement and application was to be of man. And the leap was so great from mere spoken language to written ideas, that men at first employed objective images, as sensi- ble expressions for their thoughts. Of this we have exhumed examples in those gigantic and grotesque monsters, before alluded to, which have lately been brought to light by the indefatigable Dr. Layard, out of the long-buried remains of one of the largest of ancient cities. Here the peculiarities of different animals are combined as the representatives of thought, and are made use of to body forth to the sight the mind's con- ceptions even in regard to the attributes of Divinity. " I used to contemplate for hours," he says, "these mysterious emblems, and muse over their intent and history. What more noble forms could 334 APPENDIX. have ushered the people into the temple of their gods? What more sublime images could have been borrowed from nature, by men who sought, unaided by the light of revealed religion, to embody their conception of the wisdom, power, and ubiquity of a Supreme Being ! They could find no better type of intellect and knowledge, than the head of the man; of strength, than the body of the lion ; of rapidity of motion, than the wings of the bird. These winged human-headed lions were not idle creatures, the offspring of mere fancy ; their meaning was written upon them. They had awed and instructed races which had flourished three thousand years ago. Through the portals which they guarded, kings, priests, and warriors had borne sacrifices to their altars, long before the wisdom of the East had penetrated to Greece, and had fur- nished its mythology with symbols long recognised by the Assyrian votaries." Layar&s Nineveh and its Remains, vol. i. But admitting all that this author here says, in proof of the massive genius of those who conceived these wondrous combinations of the animal to body forth the spiritual again we ask, Are we to return back to these gross and sensuous methods of express- ing ideas, or to content ourselves with the more feeble resurrections of mediaeval piety, in the place of those intellectual or rather purely spiritual methods of conceiving of and worshipping the Deity, of which Christ, by revealing him in character and action, has rendered us capable ? The great disease of the moral ON HIEROGLYPHICS. 335 world ever has been the morbism of the mind has ever manifested itself chiefly in a strong tendency to perceive and worship only the outward and visible. And is it to be supposed that this disease is to be cured by a system of religion which should consist only, or chiefly, in symbolic figures and sensible images? Our Lord taught us a different lesson, when he said to the woman of Samaria, " Believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. Ye wor- ship ye know not what... But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth ; for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a spirit ; and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth." The natural man, if left to himself, never would have conceived of the glory of God as manifesting itself in " the still small voice " within. What he wants and delights in, is something grand, splendid, pompous, awful huge temples, cathedrals, long drawn aisles, with mystic symbols, solemn sacrifices, thrilling chaunts things that strike only the eye and the ear. He was humoured in this for a time, while he was, as it were, in the childhood of human existence ; but being supposed now to have come to manhood, these childish things are done away. To revive them, in the feeble imitations of mediaeval fancy, is only to combine the dreams of youth with the dotage of old age. 336 APPENDIX. Before, however, leaving this subject of ancient symbolism, or hieroglyphic teaching, we may just observe that no one need suffer himself to be aesthetically disquieted, because he finds that a similar system was adopted, with divine sanction, under the old law; or because he meets with similar incongruous combinations of animal being, as the one above alluded to, to body forth spiritual ideas, in the prophet Ezekiel, and in others of the divine writers. What is enigma to us, was instruction to them.* These strange signs were then well understood, by means of established laws of intellectual interpretation, but now they would speak in an unknown tongue, and would require an interpreter. A slight glance over the New Testament (except- ing only the book of Revelation, which is necessarily a symbolic book, having reference to the future and unknown) will suffice to convince us that the method of teaching by enigma is done away, and that we are now to be instructed by true doctrine clearly enun- ciated, and that religion is to consist, not in mystic signs, but in energetic principles. In a word, morality, not mystery, is to be the 0pij