UC-NRLF B 3 flbfl ISM wmm mM mm mBimm m M mm- mmMm Hi 11m • REESE LIBRARY - OF Tin: < UNIVERSITY'OF. CALIFORNIA. \ •liecewed .. . APR 21 1893 /,99 . i Accessions No. ^ 1 10 7.. Class No. THE HISTORY OF LAND TENURE IN IRELAND. aottUon: C. J. CLAY AND SONS, CAMBKIDGE UNIVEKSITY PKESS WAREHOUSE, AND STEVENS AND SONS, LIMITED, 119 AND 120, CHANCERY LANE, LAW PUBLISHEES and BOOKSELLERS. flCambritiee: DEIGHTON, BELL AND CO. ILcipjts : F. A. BROCKHAUS. i^eto gorfe: MACMILLAN AND CO. THE HISTOKY OF LAND TENUKE IN IKELAND. BEING THE YORKE PRIZE ESSAY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE FOR THE YEAR 1888. BY WILLIAM ERNEST MONTGOMERY, M.A., LL.M., I > CLAKE COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE ; AND OF THE INNER TEMPLE, BARRISTER-AT-LAW. UNIVERSIT CAMBRIDGE : AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1889 [All Rights reserved.] Si lb 1 PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. PREFACE. THE Yorke Prize was founded, under the sanction of the Court of Chancery, from the bequest of Edmund Yorke, M.A., late Fellow of St Catharine's College, Cambridge. It is awarded annually to such graduate of the University, of not more than seven years' standing from his first degree, as shall be the author of the best essay upon some subject relative to " The Law of Property, its Principles and History in various Ages and Countries." The subject announced for the year 1888 was " The History of Land Tenure in Ireland," and the following pages owe their existence to the conditions of the Prize which direct that the successful Essay shall be printed and published. The immense range of an adequate history of Irish land tenure is manifest, and the present slight sketch can of necessity give but an outline of this involved subject. I may, however, briefly point out a few of the most prominent difficulties met with in tracing the troubled history of Irish land law, and explain the basis upon which the present Essay has been constructed. In the case of the Brehon Law there is undoubtedly a large opening for original work, but the initial difficulty inseparable from an entire dependence on translations, is enhanced by the complex nature of the Laws themselves. I have therefore when dealing with this branch of the subject given full references to the authorities relied on. Passing from the archaic law to English legislation I have throughout assumed that the forces of social disunion, which hindered the VI PREFACE. working of broad legislative measures, are of more importance than the multitude of petty and inefFectual experiments with Irish land law with which the Statute Book is crowded. Minor enactments have therefore been passed over in order to examine more fully those of extended scope. The national, religious, and political bias which has coloured so much of the literature connected with Ireland creates an obstacle in the way of an attempt to write an impartial history of the land law. In addition much of the recent land legislation is so involved with current politics as to render it hard to avoid the vexed questions of the day. I have, how- ever, endeavoured to the best of my ability to write without prejudice and to carefully eschew present political controversy. Wm. E. MONTGOMERY. 2, The Cloisters, Pump Court, Temple. CONTENTS. PART I. IRELAND THE ENEMY. PAGES Chap. I. The Agrarian Community of the Irish Celts . 3 — 18 Chap. II. The Brehon Law 19—39 Chap. III. The Colony of the Pale (from Henry II. to Henry VII.) 40—54 Chap. IV. The Colony of the Pale (from Henry VIL to James I.) 55 — 64 PART II. IRELAND THE SLAVE. Chap. V. The substitution of English Tenures and the era of Protestant Ascendency . . . 65 — 88 Chap. VL The Land and the People . . . . . 89—101 Chap. VIL Ireland from 1800— 1850 102—114 PART III. THE IRELAND OF TO-DAY. Chap. VIII. Ulster Tenant-Right and the Devon Commission 115 — 123 Chap. IX. Free Trade in Land . . . . . . 124—134 Chap. X. The Act of 1870 135—155 Chap. XL „ 1881 156—171 Chap. XII. Recent Legislation 172 — 181 Table of Statutes cited 182—185 Index 186—191 •' No rule of law dealing with the contracts of owners and hirers of land is in itself objectively good or bad ; the law which is most advantageous in one society would, if suddenly introduced into another, seem unjust, and probably prove mischievous ; the good or evil effects of any law depend upon its being applicable or inapplicable to the social condition of the society into which it is introduced." — A. G. Eichey. " There has in general survived to the Irish farmer, through all vicissitudes, in despite of the seeming or real veto of the law, in apparent defiance of political economy, a living tradition of possessory right, such as belonged, in the more primitive ages of society, to the status of the man who tilled the soil." — Report of the Bessborougfi Commission. M. PART I. IRELAND THE ENEMY. UNIVERSITY CHAPTER I. The Agrarian Community of the Irish Celts. The genesis of Irish social and political organization is found, said the late Sir Henry Maine, as in all the Aryan, Semitic, and Uralian races, to lie in the Family group \ Amongst the Irish Celts in the earliest times to which modern research has penetrated, a social organization built upon the actual or constructive kinship of members of the community, based on the real or theoretical descent from a common ancestor, can be traced. Such an organization finds its most perfect type in the joint family of modern India, (composed of those persons who would have taken part in the funeral ceremonies of the common ancestor), and corresponds to the Agnatic family of the Romans^. To the original conception of an organization of this nature the idea of individual property in the land is totally foreign; the rights of the individual being at most merely a more or less temporary usufruct of the soil by consent of the family group, the reversion remaining in the community. Peculiar interest, moreover, attaches to the development of the Irish agrarian system from the fact that the direct influence of that tremen- dous legislative engine the Roman Law has been absent^, and even its indirect influence has been so slight that it may fairly be treated as unimportant ^ Practically independent of ex- 1 Early History of Institutions, pp. ^ Mr Pearson says, " Ireland ex- 65, 66. It is worthy of note that when piated dearly its independence of the the first English emigrants settled in Roman dominion, the secret of its long New England, they distributed them- anarchy being in fact that it was selves in village communities. Christianized without being civilized." 2 Primitive Property, Emile de La- Hist, of Eng. during Early and Middle veleye, p. 123. E. Hist, of Inst. pp. Ages, Vol. i. p. 516. 106, 107. ^ Sullivan's Intro, p. 5, Manners and 1—2 4 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. ternal pressure, primitive Aryan custom developed into a more advanced stage, and the theory of the family was extended and modified in the attempt to fit it to the needs of increasing population \ In the Brehon Laws (which will be more fully dealt with hereafter) exists a more or less fragmentary collec- tion of some of the legal theory, if not practice, of this later stage of growth. It is endeavoured in this chapter to trace the expansion of the simple family system into the more com- plicated social organization presented by the Brehon Code ; and at the same time to mark the gradual development of separate ownership in the land, which at this later period was already being evolved from the original conception of corporate posses- sion. The Irish Celts, when ceasing to be nomad and settling upon definite areas of land, exercised apparently a social eco- nomy in which the possession of land may at first be deemed an accidental feature ; cattle constituting the only property to the possession of which much importance was attached, and remaining, even when property in land was held an integral item of the social system, the standard of value by which other things were calculated^ It would seem that in the earliest form of an ascertainable land system the head of the family group made a yearly or triennial allotment of lands ^ to the members of the family for the purpose of cultivation, and at the end of this period a redistribution was made. No right what- ever was acquired by the allottee to the piece of land thus held Customs of Ancient Irish, E. O'Curry. forming the Duthaig fine, or the sept Of the Brehon Law it may also be said in its narrower sense, as found in the that it was uninfluenced by Roman law, Brehon laws. despite that certain Roman law max- 2 Celtic Scotland, Vol. iii. c. iv. ims are incorporated in the text, and Skene. that a Roman jurisconsult is men- ^ Prof. Sullivan and the writers of tioned, for these slight touches may be the school who have endeavoured with • ascribed to contact with Churchmen. but little foundation to magnify the E. Hist, of Inst. p. 55. civilization of the early Irish Celts, 1 To this modification of the origi- hold that the tribe-land was universally nal theory of family unity we may held in severalty at the time of the ascribe the curious division of the Brehon laws, and that these periodical Irish family into the Geilfine, Deir- allotments extended only to the corn- fine, larfine, and Indfine, together mon lands. I] OF THE IRISH CELTS. for a year, he had merely by consent the usufruct thereof for such time. The tribal group is but an enlarged model of the family group, the members of the original cluster being repre- sented by the allied sub-groups. Thus in its full expansion the tribe or fine^ is found, with a chieftain or king at its head, formed of an aggregate of groups each a miniature of the larger tribe, and in their turn composed of other clusters until the lowest item of the social organization is reached in the family group or sept'^ Such sept being the unit of a society^ in which an individual as distinct from a member of a family group had scarcely in theory a proprietary existence. The mode of dealing with the land gradually underwent change, the yearly allotment passed into an allotment for life, the reversion being in the sept. It should be remembered, however, that in early times the portions of land allotted to members ^ "The term 'fine' or 'family' is used to designate all subdivisions of Irish society, the tribe in its largest extent, the sept or the sub-tribe," Systems of Landliolding ^ C. D. Field, p. 239. Sir H. Maine held that the 'fine' translated ' tribe ' in the Corns Bescna was the sept. In the Tripartite Life of St Patrick, where information might have been hoped for, no direct light is thrown upon the subject (see Vol. i. p. clxviii.). - Mr F. Seebohm says, "A sept consisted of a number of actual or re- puted Uood relations bearing the same family names, and bound together by other and probably more artificial ties, such as common liability for the pay- ment of eric, or blood fines." The English Village Community^ c. vii. p. 219. The exact model of the sept is the joint family of modern India. It is a corporate, self-supporting unit, with " a perpetual existence like a so- ciety in mortmain;" it is "a juristic person and holds and acquires pro- perty ;" its continuity depends on the land occupied by it, " but it is not merely a land-owning body, it has live chattels and dead chattels distin- guished from those of individual tribes- men. Nor is it purely a cultivating body, it may follow a professional calling." Maine, Laveleye, Field. From surveys of the country as late as the year 1600, in which the names of tenants are given, it is evident that they were blood relations, "with a care- fully preserved genealogy guarding the fact of their relationship and conse- quent position in the tribe. ' ' Seebohm. " Survey of County Monaghan in 33 Eliz." Inquisitiones Cancellariae Hi- berniae ii. pp. xxi. and xxiii. and ex- tract therefrom quoted at p. 216, See- bohm. 3 Mr Skene, however, holds that the tuath or tribe preceded the sept, and ascribes the origin of the fine or sept, which is found at the time of the Brehon Laws, not in any way to a development of family relations, but to what may be termed the wealth- family of the Bo-Aire and his depend- ents. See Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. 171. 6 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. of the tribe would form but a comparatively small portion of the tribal territory, which would be divided into (1) pas- turage ground held by the tribe in common, (2) unoccupied and waste lands at first common property but in later times much trenched upon by the chief, (3) the usufructuary allotments of arable land\ The mode of succession to land at the time of the Brehon Laws was the custom of Gavelkind ^ by which on the death of a member of the sept the portion of land which had been allotted to him passed back into the general stock and the chief made a redistribution. It is pointed out by Mr Seebohm that the clustering of households so frequently met with in the early Irish surveys, and the runrig^ form of the open field allotments, were the natural modes of conducting a co-operative and shift- ing agriculture*. In the ancient Irish law it is clear that though the tribe is settled on the land, it yet holds, and is in- fluenced by, ideas derived from the time when kinship and not property was the bond between its members — this being the explanation of Gavelkind succession. It is only necessary to imagine the bonds of kinship further relaxed, and the connec- tion of each family to the land strengthened till the tempo- rary allotment to the household has become its actual property, 1 See Skene, Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. finny apr^s le mort de chescun terte- 139. nant que avait competent portion de 2 And as regards the chieftain " Ta- terre, assemblait tout le sept, et aiant nistry," this will be dealt with later. mis touts lour possessions en hotch- Gavelkind is from gabhail-cine=ac- pot fesait nouvel partition de tout : en cepted from the tribe. Although ori- quel partition il ne assignait a les fils ginally upon a death all the lands in de cesty que mourust le portion que the sept were re-distributed, eventually lour pere avait; mes il allotait al chas- it would seem that only the lands held cun del sept solonque son antiquity." by the deceased were so dealt with. Davies' Reports : Le Irish Custome de (Field.) The custom of Gavelkind was Gavelkind (quoted Laveleye). thus described by Sir John Davies — ^ Eundale, runrigg or runacre (said "Issint les terresde nature de gavelkind to be derived from Celtic roinn-diol, ne fueront partibles enter le prochen i.e. having a share in distribution: heires males de cesty qui morust sei- Laveleye) ... Similar systems prevailed sie, mes enter touts les males de son till quite lately in the Scottish High- sept en cest manner. Le canfinny, ou lands. E. Hist, of Inst. p. 101. chief del sept, fesait toutes les parti- 4 English Village Community, Sec- tions per son discretion. Cest can- bohm, p. 230. I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 7 to see the basis of the English custom of Gavelkind which is often erroneously contrasted with the archaic Irish mode of succession bearing the same name. But though this custom of Gavelkind (in its large sense) was still at the time of the Brehon Laws generally accepted as the theory of succession to land, and the proprietary rights were theoretically vested in the community, there is evidence to prove that much individual property actually existed ; so much so indeed that at the end of the 10th or beginning of the 11th century the Irish people were in a state of transition from common property to several ownership, the Brehon writers themselves rather favouring the theory of private property \ Many causes went to produce this alteration in the nature and conception of ownership. As a primary factor in causing the change stands the increase of population, aided by the fact that in certain instances the temporary occupation of tribe-land by the individual tended, through the sufferance or consent of che community, to become permanent^: lasting possession being probably generated by the scarcity of land rendering a higher degree of cultivation necessary than the periodical division every year or every three years would allow, and the extra labour expended fostering the idea of property I In addition, a change which took place in the social organization of society, namely the increase in the power of the chief, had a large influence in breaking up the archaic theory of communism in the soil*. The original notion of Father of the community 1 The book of the Dun Cow (Lebor 2 ^_ [jist. of Inst. p. 95. na Huidre) compiled in the 7th century ^ Prim. Prop. p. 125. by the Abbot of Clanmacnois, known •* " It may now, however, be laid to us in an Irish ms. of the year 1100, down without rashness that Property says " Round the field there was neither in Land, as known to communities of ditch, hedge, nor stone wall, and the the Aryan race, has had a twofold land was not divided till came the origin. It has arisen partly from the period of the sons of Aed Slane (7th disentanglement ofthe individual rights cent.), but only smooth fields.... It was of the kindred or tribesmen from the in consequence of the great number of collective rights of the Family or Tribe, families at this time that divisions and partly from the growth and trans- and boundaries of the soil were intro- mutation of the sovereignty of the duced in Ireland." Seebohm, p. 225 Tribal Chief." E. Hist, of Imt. ip. 120. and Prim. Prop. Laveleye, p. 125. 8 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. became merged in that of Leader of the clan, and even the idea of kinship amongst members of the tribe was assimilated to that of a bond of subjection to a common authority, in the further growth of which idea lies the root of the pseudo-clanship of the fuidhir tenants \ In order to understand the position of the chief with regard to the land it is necessary to appreciate the mode of succession to the chieftaincy — as regulated by the custom of Tanistry. A chief was elected for life by the whole tribe or sept, usually by show of hands, and his successor was in most cases chosen in the same way"^ during his lifetime. Though this successor (who when elected was termed the ' Tanaist ') was nominally supposed to be the next of blood who was eldest and worthiest ^ it is easy to see how great weight the wishes of the existing ruler would have in regulating the choice of the clan. It is evident that a door was here opened for easy inroad on the corporate ownership of the tribe-land. When the Tanaist was a near relation of the then chief, landed property held by such chief in his private capacity would be likely on his death to be continued to his descendants with a lofty disregard of the customs of Gavelkind. Moreover even if it were appropriated by the Tanaist on his accession to the chieftaincy as being part of the appanage of office, and thus his due by the custom of Tanistry, it would by increasing the vassals and hence the power of the new ruler render further depredation by him from the tribe the more easy. The chief on election became, by virtue of such election, the proprietor of a seigniory over all 1 Post, pp. 9, 17. =^ The Cain. Aigillne A. L. of I. Vol. - Field, p. 242.... "When the claimant ii. p. 279 says *'The head of every was powerful even the form of election tribe... should be the man of the tribe was occasionally dispensed with. It is who is the most experienced, the most hard to overrate the power of * the noble, the most wealthy, the wisest, strong man armed ' in troublous times. the most learned, the most truly popu- Strongbow himself is said to have been lar, the most powerful to oppose, the raised to the post of Roydamna during most steadfast to sue for profits and the lifetime of Dermot MacMurrough to be sued for losses." The chief- and hence to have claimed to succeed taincy being elective, a power seems him. Hume says " The usual title of also to have rested with the clan, and to each petty sovereign was the murder have been sometimes exercised, of re- ef his predecessor." moving a chief for mal-administra- I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 9 the lands of the tribe, and his power was greater still over the waste-lands \ From these latter, indeed, more than from in- equitable re-allotment of occupied tribe-lands, it is probable that his accession of those allodiaP lands was made, which by the facilities they offered for the support of his retainers and servile dependents became the mainstay of his power and the stepping-stone to increased conversion of tribal territory into private property. The very nature of the tribal system fostered this germ of despotism, for recurring once again to the archaic theory of the family community, and endeavouring to realize what was the position of a member who from any cause was expelled from its charmed circle, it is found that becoming a very Ishmael without a social, political, or legal existence no course was open to him but to endeavour to assimilate himself by some means to another kindred association. The only means by which this could be accomplished was by becoming the per- sonal retainer of some chief, who in return for his services would give protection, and by subjection to whose authority he would gain a pseudo-kinship with the members of the tribe. In this way arose the class of Fuidhirs, strangers or fugitives from other tribes ; and the tribal chief who extended his aegis over the outcast would in all probability allot for his use a portion of the waste-land of the tribe I Such land, held theo- retically at the will of the tribe, but practically from the chief, in return probably for military or agricultural service, soon became looked upon as a portion of the chief's demesnes (if it tion. See case of Donell O'Garmleay, subject E. Hist, of Inst. p. 93. quoted p. 70, Vol. ii. of Ware's An- ^ It is surely justifiable to use this tiquities of Ireland. term here. 1 Whilst dealing with the various ^ ^g jg pointed out by Mr Justice causes that broke up the theory of Field, the 'Senchus Mor ' alludes to common ownership and established three rents, a rack rent or extreme rent severalty, it must be remembered that from one of a strange tribe (the Fuid- on the waste-lands near the border, hir), a fair rent from one of the tribe, cultivators of servile status were per- the stipulated rent paid alike by him mitted to squat, and cultivating set- of the tribe and him of a strange tribe, tlements of tribesmen occasionally Landholding and the relation of Land- took possession thereof; in many of lord and Tenant in various countries. these cases something resembling in- 2nd Ed. p. 240. See also E. Hist, of dividual property arose. See on this Imt. 10 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. is admissible to use the English manorial term) ; and the abso- lute dependence of the fuidhir tenant is well shown by the passages in the Brehon Law^ sanctioning distress from a chief who did not aid his fuidhir against injustice. In addition to his seigniory over the lands of the tribe, and his more extensive power over the waste-lands of the commu- nity, the chief had also certain lands allotted to him in a special way as appurtenant to his state, termed mensal lands, and these descended from chief to chief according to the custom of Tanistry as the appanage of office^. In these lands, separated from the common stock to support the dignity of the chief- taincy, is to be traced one of the very earliest signs of the decay of the system of corporate possession by the tribe, and in all probability the lever which opened the door to the earliest instances of separate property. The great power pos- sessed by the chief over the tribe and the unsettled state both of society and law makes it apparent that the lands which were given as an attribute of the chieftaincy as to a corporation sole would be very liable to be retained by the nearest relatives of the chieftain in private ownership on his death. By the time of the Brehon Laws the power of the chief had so increased over certain members of the tribe as to reduce them to a position of dependence^ by the development of Saer and Daer tenancy, with the result that the lands originally occupied by them in ordinary common ownership with the rest of the clan had come to be held in many cases at what is equivalent to a rent. To properly understand the growth of these tenancies it is necessary to bear in mind that despite any amount of ultimate possession or control which was exercised over the land by the head of the clan, the germ of his power lay in the possession of cattle. These, the natural spoil of war to the conquering chief, were in the early agricultural commu- nity of more intrinsic value than land, of which there was at first a surplusage* ; and it is in a great measure to the power 1 Sen. Mor {A. L. of I. Vol. i. pp. 125 System of Ireland, Law Quarterly Re- and 139). view, 1887, pp. 135 and 136. O'Con- 2 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 92. nor Morris. 3 Much as the Patrician obtained ^ One is struck instantly in the power over the Plebeian debtor. Land Brehon Law, with the immense import- I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 11 over a tribesman acquired by the chief to whom he was in- | debted for a loan of cattle, that the origin of the idea of rent for the soil may be traced \ ~^ Saer and Daer stock tenancies are the names given to the relation subsisting between chief and tribesman, when a loan of cattle has been advanced by the former to the latter ; the difference between Saer and Daer tenancy resting in the fact that in the first where only a portion of the tenant's stock is provided by the chief the tenant debtor remains a freeman, in the latter where all the stock is found he becomes a villanus'' or at any rate is in a semi-servile state. Such loans, probably one of the most formidable agencies in increasing the power of the chief, were it would appear largely imposed upon those who being tribesmen were obliged to receive the charge from their head^ and were always resorted to by those whose poverty pre- vented the acquisition of cattle (that is of the means of tillage) by independent means. The complicated rules of these tenancies will be referred to later on whqn the enactments of the Brehon Law will be more fully dealt with. Here they are only im- portant in so far as they represent another factor in the influences breaking down the theory of common ownership of the soil by the clan, and laying the foundation of ownership of land held from a chief. The inroad made by these tenancies upon the original theory of tribal constitution becomes far more apparent when it is found that they were not confined to chief and tribesmen of one clan, but might be created between ance attached to the possession of base wages from any man unless it be cattle. his own will to do so, andT it is com- 1 Sir H. Maine held that the rent petent for him not to accept Saerrath payable in the produce of the stock (free wages) from anyone but from a and refections ultimately became a king, but he is not entitled to refuse rent payable in respect of the land. the free wages of his king. Every The stock lent was termed 'Taurcreic' man in the Tuath is bound to receive and the food rent *Besa,' see E. Hist. the wages of the Eig Tuatha (king of of Inst. p. 160, and Skene Vol. iii. the territory)," and says "Theoretical- p. 146. ly speaking no freeman need become 2 Field, pp. 241 — 242. the dependent of another save the 3 Prof. Sullivan quotes the following king of his territory, but the condition enactment of the Brehon Law. "It is of dependence was imposed upon him competent for a man never to accept by the circumstances of his position." 12 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. members of different clans ; the tribesman of one becoming the Daer-stock tenant of another. The social connection between the chief and his tenants is stated in the Senchus Mor^ to be "That he (the chief) is to give them stock and returnable *seds,' and to protect them against every injustice that he is able, and they are to render him victuals and labour, and respect, and to return the 'seds' to his heir, or for his heir where it is right (to do so). The chief has {power to pronounce) judgment, and proof, and witness, upon his Daer-stock tenants ; but his Saer-stock tenants can oppose them, and bear witness against his tenants if they be impartial witnesses." These Saer and Daer tenancies are also important in their bearing on the modifications of the land system, for their tendency was un- doubtedly to reduce the debtor to vassalage ; and in this fact probably lies the explanation of the origin of many of the complicated servile groups with which we are confronted in the Brehon Laws and in all early Irish history^. The theory of common ownership recognized no right of alienation by the individual of his share of the tribe-land ^, and even in the Brehon Laws this doctrine holds, " every tribesman is able to keep his tribe-land, he is not to sell it, or alienate it, or conceal it, or give it to pay for crimes or contracts "*. The original universality of the rule was, however, infringed by exceptions and in certain cases a portion at least of his tribe- land might be alienated by the tribesman by grant, contract, or bequest. As regards the property which his own effort had ac- quired, a larger power of alienation was possessed by the tribes- man than he had over that obtained by allotment. Again in the Cortis Bescna a still further distinction is drawn between the property which a man has acquired by special industry and that which is merely the produce of the land in the ordi- nary course of husbandry, the former being regarded as more 1 Ancient Laws of Ireland, Vol. ii. ' commendation ' are thus produced." p. 345. E. Hist, of Inst. p. 158. 2 "It is by taking stock that the ^ g^ve by consent of the corn- free Irish tribesman becomes the Ceile munity. or Kyle, the vassal or man of his chief, ^ A. L. of I. Vol. ii. p. 283, and see owing him not only rent but service E. Hist, of Inst. p. 108. and homage. The exact effects of I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 13 particularly his own property and hence his right of alienation being greater over it. An examination of the Brehon Laws shows that there can be little doubt that the growth of this power of alienation found if not its origin at least its most fostering element in the influence of the Church \ How early such influence began to work it is impossible to say, for there is negative evidence that for some time after the arrival of St Patrick Christianity had not spread throughout Ireland I Still it is certain that beginning from about the time of St Patrick the ecclesiastical element entered the Irish legal system, and many of the increased facilities for the alienation of land, and much of the advancement of the idea of the binding nature of contract are due to the efforts of the monks. The Christian influence on the law tended in the direction of increasing the property of the Church, with a view to which it favoured free- dom of alienation. Thus despite that the Brehon Law lays down that 'no tribesman is to sell, alienate, or conceal his tribe-land or to give it to pay for his crimes or contracts V yet under certain circumstances exceptions were made, and in its original conception the grantee contemplated is without doubt the Church* which is indebted to this source for its term on lands. The position of the Church with regard to the land at the time of the Brehon Laws is thus explained in the Senchus Mor^, " The social connection which subsists between the church 1 A curious side light is thrown he was killed by the sun and wind, on this by the fact that in the Tri- " Laeghaire, son of Niall, died partite Life of St Patrick, the word for On the side of Caissi, green its bequest occurs four times and always land ; in connection with ecclesiastics. The elements of God, whose guar- 2 For example see a passage in the antee he had violated, Annals of the Four Masters, Vol. i. Inflicted the doom of death upon pp. 143, 145 (quoted in Pritchard's the king." Physical History of Mankind, p. 140), This quatrain is quoted in The Four where it is stated that Laeghaire, the Masters, p. 145, and also in Lehor na son of Niall, having been in the year Huidre, but the author is unknown. 457 taken captive in a battle against ^ A. L. of I. Vol. ii. p. 283. the inhabitants of Leinster, swore by ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 108. the sun and the wind that he would ^ Sen. Mor (A. L. of I. Vol. ii. never again demand a tribute for his pp. 345 and 347). cows. The oath having been violated 14 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. and its tenants of ecclesiastical lands is, preaching and offer- ing: — and requiem is due from the church to its tenants of ecclesiastical lands, and the receiving of every son for instruc- tion, and of every (such) tenant to right repentance ; tithes, and first fruits, and alms, are due of them to her, and full honor price when they are in strong health, and one-third honor price at the time of death ; and the church has (the power of pro- nouncing judgment), and proof, and witness upon its tenants of ecclesiastical land, both Saer-stock tenants and Daer-stock tenants ; and upon every other layman, even though he be a Saer-stock tenant of ecclesiastical lands, unless there is another church of equal dignity claiming him." This extract shows conclusively how large a temporal power had been acquired by the Church, and it is plain how potent an influence it must have exerted in moulding the Brehon Law. It is far from improbable also that the power of the Church was felt in the local laws which influenced petty communities to a larger extent than is shown by the laws of Tara. Mr Skene, who lays stress on the laxity of sexual relations in the earliest times of Irish history, would also ascribe in the main to the influence of the Christian church^ the practical creation of the paternal power ^, and would defer till this time the real existence of the family group with the father as its head. It seems probable, however, even if the marriage bond was not held binding, that he has under- rated the eagerness with which sons (the warriors of the future) and daughters (by whose means valuable alliances could be contracted) would be claimed by the father as members of his family I Though the various causes'* which tended to break down the original theory of family unity, to disintegrate collective 1 The Early Irish Ecclesiastical the legitimation not only of the Law limited marriage relations strictly. bastard, but of the adulterine bastard, Canones S. Patricii {Councils and Ec- and measures the compensation to be clesiastical documents of Great Britain paid to the putative father." E. Hist, and Ireland, A. W. Hodden and W. of Inst. p. 59. Stubbs). ii. Synod xxv — xxviii. See ■* The influence of the more ad- The Celtic Church by F. E. Warren. vanced civilization of foreign nations 2 Skene's Celt. Scot. Vol. in. p. 138. was scarcely felt by the early Irish com- 3 " The 'Book of Aicill' provides for munity, and is only treated of in two I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 15 ownership and to establish the theory of several possession, have been touched on, it must not be imagined that in the Brehon Laws ownership in severalty was recognized as the rule. On the contrary the property, social, and juristic rights of indi- viduals are still theoretically merged in the system of the family group, but the numerous exceptions which are apparent show clearly the effects of the attacks made on the original conception of ownership. There is clearly traceable the pro- gress of what may be termed the natural feudalization of the land, retarded indeed by the want of a strong centralized government and doomed never to be consummated in the natural order of things, (since the Brehon Law was roughly rooted up, and a more advanced system thrust on a nation unfit to receive it) but 'Undeniably present. Before commencing an examination of the extant tracts of the Brehon Law it is necessary to treat more fully than has yet been done of the relation of the landholding classes between themselves in early Irish society. In the earliest times the inhabitants of Ireland are found divided into the two great classes, free and unfree\ and these two classes seem to have been divided into many grades. Amongst the free the division is one which may almost be termed that of the " classes and masses." The former order, the Aires, being again subdivided into the two classes of (1) Flaths and (2) Bo- Aires ^ The Flaths represented an aristocracy of instances in this essay (1) where the influence of the Church is incidentally dealt with in this and the following chapter, (2) where the effect of the establishment of the Colony of the Pale is treated of in chapters III. and IV. 1 " The acts of the Council of Armagh in 1171 show that there had been a custom of buying Anglo- Saxons from merchants robbers and pirates ; for it was decreed ' ut Angli ubique per insulam servitatis vinculo mancipati in pristinam revocentur libertatem.' " (See Sigerson quoting Girald. Camb. Expugnatio Hibernica, L. I. c. xviii.) Some very ancient Canons of the Church (quoted c. 20 Ware) also point to this, and we learn from Seyer's History of Bristol that slaves were ex- ported from England even as late as the reign of King John. See also William of Malmesbury de Vit Wlstani. In the Book of Rights, printed by the Celtic Society, p. 174, and quoted by Skene in Vol. iii. p. 140, the legendary origin of the class of the unfree is given. In the main slavery was due to the successive waves of conquest and to the effect of internal wars. - See Sullivan's Intro, to O'Curry, pp. c. and ci. 16 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. birth, their wealth lying in land and their rank being hereditary; whilst the Bo-Aires or Cow- Aires represented an aristocracy of wealth, or those who from the amount of their possessions in cattle rose above the ordinary tribesman, and whose descendants under certain circumstances were capable of rising to the rank of Flaths. These two classes of Aires alone possessed to the full the rights of freemen \ but the possession of sufficient wealth entitled any free native to become a Bo-Aire. The ordinary free tribesman was the Fer Midba, or inferior man, and of this class there are two divisions (1) those over the age of 14 and under 20, who though emancipated were not in pos- session of their full privileges, and (2) those over the age of 20, entitled to a separate residence and a share of the tribe-land I When the tribesman had received a loan of cattle he became a member of the class of Ceiles. The Ceiles were divided into the Saer, that is free, Ceiles and the Daer or base Ceiles. The relation of these two classes to the chief to whom they were indebted for the loan of cattle has been already remarked under the short description given of Saer and Daer stock holdings, and will be more fully dealt with later. Although the Daer Ceiles were base tenants they were yet possessed of certain definite rights in the tribe and in the tribal territory, and in this were widely separated from the servile classes of the Bothacks, Sencleiths and Fuidhirs whose rights were few, and who were almost in a state of complete servitude ^ These latter classes cultivated what in default of a better word may be termed the chief's demesnes, and possessed no political rights. " The Bothacks* or Cottiers, Saer and Daer, had a right of settlement, served the land noble as hired and farm labourers and performed menial services^" The Sencleiths appear to have been old adherents of the Flath, the descendants of old and ^ See Sullivan's Intro, to O'Curry, Bothacks seem to have been possessed p. cix. of no property save a cabin on the lands 2 See Skene's Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. of the Flath whom they served ; the 143. ' Daer Bothacks were farm labourers. 3 Sullivan's Intro, to O'Curry, p. cxv. ^ Sigerson's History of Land Tenures * Bothack fromBoth, a shed or cabin. and Land Glasses in Ireland, p. 9. Prof. Sullivan says that the Saer L] of the IRISH CELTS. 17 privileged servants or persons who at some time by favour had acquired a right to settle on the demesne \ The Fuidhir or refugee tenants have been treated of before, but it should be noticed that a great point of difference existed between them and the classes of Bothacks and Sencleiths; for whilst the latter formed part of the affiliated family or clan known in the Brehon Law as the ' Fine Flatha,' and were entitled as of right to susten- ance, habitation, and to the usufruct of the soil, the former class were strangers and outcasts, their rights in the clan, if any, being based on a contract with its chief. The free Fuidhirs indeed possessed in some degree the rights of freemen, being in reality strangers from other tribes, who, in consideration of only holding their Fuidhir tenancy of the land from year to year^, were allowed to retain certain rights. The Daer Fuidhirs on the other hand^ were in all respects in a position of the most servile dependence and were the victims of great hardships, their rights and liabilities being in almost all cases merged in those of the Flath on whom they were dependent, and whose chattels to all intents and purposes they were. These Daer Fuidhirs were mostly prisoners taken in war^, escaped criminals who had been given shelter, defaulting debtors, and outcasts of every kind. It seems, however, that a man might voluntarily become a Daer Fuidhir, and that he might become so for a limited number of years ; while a family of this class who remained nine times nine years on the land became entitled to rank with the Sencleiths. The following table purports to show the relation of the social orders of the tribe ^ or Tuath. 1 For example mercenaries. diffidence the subject being much in- 2 Prof . Sullivan says " If he entered volved. For authorities see Skene, into longer engagements than one Vol. iii. p. 142 — 147, also Ancient Laws, year with another than his own chief Vol. iv. p. 299, also Sigerson and Sul- he lost his rights and became per- livan. The classes of the Bo-Aires of manentlya Fuidhir." Intro. to O'Curry, which the Aire coisring "who repre- p. cxxv. sented the people before king and sy- 3 The Brehon Law draws a very nod " was the highest, and the Ogaire or sharp line of demarcation between the 'young lord' the lowest, differed merely Saer and Daer Fuidhir. in their degrees of wealth. The classes * St Patrick was of this class when of the Flaths are based on the number he was first brought to Ireland. of Ceile tenants each possessed, the ^ This table is put forward with Aire-forgaill being the most important M. 2 18 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY OF THE IRISH CELTS. Free 1. The Ri or king 2. The Tanaist 3. The Aires Flaths Bo-Aires fAi JAi Aire-forgaill Aire-tuise L 4. The Fer Midba Unfree « r Receive stock from the Ri j direct ^ I Receive stock r Aire-ard I from a •) Aire-echta L Flath ( Aire-desa Aire-coisring Ferfothla Bruighfer Febhsa Aitheck or Athreba 'L Ogaire Saer Ceile Semi-servile ( Daer Ceile r Possessing some rights in f the tribe, but none in J Saer Bothacks tribal territory only in ] Saer Sencleiths chief's demesne [_ Possessing very few rights ] Daer Bothacks Servile -i ^^ *^® *^^^® i Daer Sencleiths the Grad Flath the Grad Feine the Fine Flatha or affiliated family or clan. T).^«c«««,•v,., ^^ ^,-„v,+c ;r, fv,« I Saer Fuidhirs (had some rights as Possessmg no rights m the J fj-gemen). ^^ ^ ' Daer Fuidhirs (no rights whatever). and being also probably the Flath Geilfine or Geilfine chief. Though the above table gives the organization of a complete tribe, such tribe would not probably stand alone but would be linked by certain ties to other Tuaths, and the body thus constituted would represent that larger tribe known as the Mortuath. CHAPTER II. The Beehon Law. Having sketched the various causes which chiefly tended in Ireland to mould into a more complex form the original conception of ownership by the clan, and the disintegrating influences which tended to develop ownership in severalty, it is proposed in this chapter to examine more carefully the exact nature of land holding as recognized by the Brehon Laws. These Laws were the work of a particular class — the Bre- hons (Brithemain), a hereditary caste of lawyers. It has been suggested that these Brehons were substantially identical with the class of Druids found amongst the Celts of the Continent ^ and it may be that on the introduction of Christianity the Irish Druids concentrated their attention on the study and ex- pansion of the laws, a subject which had formerly been only a portion of their duties I This supposition goes far towards accounting for a great mass of semi-barbarous and semi-chris- tian but altogether religious doctrine in the secular Brehon Law. It is specially noticeable as affording an explanation of the comparatively insignificant relation of the sanctions to various offences by suggesting the existence, at the time of the inception of the rules ^, of a moral sanction forming the understood complement of each material enactment and reme- dying its deficiencies. 1 See E. Hist, of Inst. p. 35. ^ Notice on this subject the late Sir 2 The Sen. Mor ascribes the good H. Maine's remarks on " Sitting judgments of the Brehon Law to the Dharna," and the statement in the influence of the Holy Spirit on just Sen. Mor {A. L. of I. Vol. i. p. 113) men who were in the island of Erin that notice and fasting precede dis- before its conversion. A. L. of I. In- tress in the case of a chief. tro. Vol. I. p. viii. 2—2 20 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. Generally of Royal blood and standing in the relation of ad- viser to the chief ^ while in many cases little if at all his inferior in prestige^; the representatives of culture as opposed to crass ignorance, and claiming through St Patrick a semi-inspired origin for their legal rules', the Brehons in the earlier phases of Irish history possessed in themselves, and transmitted to their rules, an authority which it is hard for those trained in modern ideas to realize. The weight attaching to the dicta of the Brehon was the more remarkable as the system was based on mere voluntary references to arbitration*, and as the sanction was a factor conspicuous mainly by its absence or insufficiency ; while even when existent it appears to have been irregularly and intermittently enforced owing to the want of a strong cen- tralized government. The great antiquity of the system whose legal rules of social relations and public polity the Brehon Laws profess to expound and regulate, render it a matter of deep regret that there is a scarcity of ancient Irish MSS. The limited amount of authentic documents, however, is no matter of wonder when it is re- membered that anarchy reigned supreme in early Irish history, and that the absence of walled towns and stone buildings ren- dered the preservation of manuscripts difficult ; while, in addi- tion, during the earlier part of the 18th century it was a serious matter to be as much as found in possession of an Irish book^. The Brehon Laws, as far as extant, consist of certain tracts, the text of which is glossed and expanded by later commentaries. Commissioners were appointed for the purpose of selecting and translating the Ancient Laws of Ireland, and the four volumes published by them contain translations of the Senchus Mor with its subtracts ^ the book of Aicill, the Crith Gabhlach, and 1 A. L. of I. Vol. IV. p. 341. 4 See — in one of the prefaces to 2 " For the king excels, for he can 3rd Vol. of Ancient Laws. In the decide against every kind of person Sen. Mor it is stated that any foreigner except those of the two orders of re- or stranger was entitled to be judged ligion and learning who are of equal by any Brehon he might choose, rank with himself." Sen. Mor, Gloss. 4. L. o/I. Vol. i. p. 7. ^. L. o/I. Vol. I. p. 85. 5 guUivan's Intro, to O'Curry, p. 3 See the account given by the Sen. xix. Mor of the origin of the Brehon Law. ^ The Senchus Mor is divided into II.] THE BREHON LAW. 21 certain smaller tracts on judgments of co-tenancy, of divisions of land, of divisions of the tribe and territory, of crimes, of rights of water and so forth, with a tract on bee judgments. The date of the ancient law tracts is very uncertain ; the Senchus Mor is stated in the Annals of the four Masters to date at 438 A.D., but the principal extant Brehon manuscripts are pro- bably not older than the 14th century, some being even as recent as the beginning of the 15th\ The obsolete form of language of much of their text, however, and the portions of old versified law embedded in it, point to a probability of these manuscripts being in the main transcripts from older writings, many of the glosses being as much translations as explanations^. But even taking this into ' consideration the language in which the manuscripts are written will not carry us back much farther than the middle of the 9th century^, and the late Sir Henry Maine thought that the dates of the Senchus Mor and the book of Aicill were the 11th and 10th centuries respectively. The Senchus Mor itself indeed claims to have been coeval with St Patrick; and Professor Sullivan argues from the internal (1) the law of distress, (2) Services of for my soul. This is Christmas night, Hostage Sureties, (3) Fosterage, (4) and on this night I place myself under the two laws of tenure Saer-Stock the protection of the King of Heaven (Cain Law) and Daer- Stock (Cain and earth, beseeching that He will Aigillne), (5) social connexions, (6) bring me and my friends safe through customary law (Corns Bescna). The this plague." remainder is lost but is supposed to ^ Prof. Sullivan instances the case have consisted of a tract on fines for of Druim Gall, a legal scribe in the stealing from a church or termon county of Clare between 1509 — 1511, lands. who confessed he could not understand 1 Dr O'Donovan translated a mar- the organization or functions of the ginal note which purports to have been ancient courts of Ireland (at this date written in 1350 on one of the Dublin the Irish laws were still in force in manuscripts of the Sen. Mor to show Clare, which was the last part of Ire- that it existed at that time. It runs land where the judgment of a Brehon " One thousand three hundred ten and was delivered) and says, "Here we forty years from the birth of Christ to have decisive evidence of a consider- this night ; and this is the second year able lapse of time between the period since the coming of the plague into when the courts were held in their Ireland. I have written this in the full state and the beginning of the 16th twentieth year of my age. I am Hugh, century." Intro, to O'Curry, p. xv. son of Conor Mac Egan, and whoever ^ ^^ jj^gt qJ j^f^ p. 12 ; Sullivan's reads it let him offer a prayer of mercy Intro, to O'Curry, p. xvi and xvii. 22 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. state of Ireland after the commencement of the Danish wars that the laws must be prior to the beginning of the 9th century, surmising that the three centuries after St Patrick (practically the only period of even comparative tranquillity which the early history of Ireland records) were the parents of the Brehon Laws. But it is open to doubt whether legal activity will only co- exist with political quiescence. If this is indeed the date of the Brehon Laws being first committed to writing, their codifi- cation may rather be ascribed to the stimulus given to intellec- tual activity by the educational influences of the Church. The early Irish law has many strong points of similarity with the laws of Wales ^ subject, however, to the important difference that the influence of the to some extent authoritative central government, which has fixed its seal on the Welsh laws, is absent in the Brehon code. The comparison nevertheless is of value as illustrating with much clearness that the alleged differences between Aryan sub-races are rather differences in their degrees of development than essential discrepancies ^ The Brehon Law, despite its pretensions to being a code, is rather " an accretion of rules which have clustered round an older nucleus ^" portions of the ancient versified law being, as has been stated, incorporated in the Senchus Mor and the book of Aicill. The late Sir Henry Maine held that probably each tract was the property of some individual legal school and exhi- bited its particular tenets*. In support of this it should be remembered that these laws were not in reality a " legislative structure," but were composed of the dicta of certain learned Brehons^ upon sets of facts, either submitted to them or hypo- thetically stated by them. This juridical interpretation stood alone as the source of the Brehon Law, and bears a strong surface 1 See Ancient Laws of Wales, pub. judgment, e.g. " Sean, son of Aighe, by Comm. ; History of Wales, by John passed the first judgment concerning Jones. distress." Sen. Mor, A. L. of I. Vol, 2 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 96. i. p. 79. 3 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 10. ' ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 24, instancing ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 16, and this the book of Aicill, by its own statement would perhaps account for the way in composed of the judgments of two Bre- which stress is laid in many cases on hons, Cormac and Cennfaeladh. the name of a Brehon who passed a II.] THE BREHON LAW. 23 analogy to the " responsa prudentum " of the Roman law, but the difference caused by the absence in the former case of the machinery of the courts and the sanctioning power of a cen- tralized government prevents any true similarity. It is a matter of great difficulty to know what stress to lay upon individual statements in the tracts, for in not a few cases the rules have evidently been constructed through certain given facts having suggested a number of hypothetical cases to the mind of the Brehon, upon which, though the law is laid down with great nicety and assurance, it is hard to imagine it possessed of a binding force. In the absence of that authority which can only be existent in conjunction with a strong central- ized government, bald statements of supposititious law\ not sanctioned by immemorial custom, could scarcely have carried any widespread authority. Not a few of the cases given are so trivial as to strongly suggest that they were merely illustrative examples used by the Brehon to instruct his pupil in the ex- pansion of particular rules I This theory of development also possesses inherent probability, for had the aim of the Brehon lawyer been directed to ascertaining general principles instead of particular applications, a more advanced law would have been obtained, but the greatest proof of the genuine antiquity of the system would have been lost. The difficulty of justly estimating the relative value of the statements of these archaic laws is increased by the fact that a large proportion of their contents have palpably been evolved by successive generations; partly from the pre-existing law tenets, either oral or written, of the founder of the school, but also partly from the real or imaginary needs of increasing popu- lation, enlarged learning, and more diffused culture. These later additions have been sheltered under the cloak of the founder's supposed semi-divine^ infallibility, and have been 1 "Much of the commentary is con- 3 «(The early Brehon, possessing in fessedly speculative, and does not re- his own breast the whole law, assumed present any existing customary law." a mysterious character, and was treated A. L. of I. Intro. Vol. iii. p. x. as an inspired or quasi-divine person- 2 This is particularly noticeable in age." A. L. of I. Intro. Vol. iii. p. the tract on bee judgments. xxxi. 24 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. incorporated into his system by what may almost be termed mental ' commendation \' Another difficulty also is met with at the outset of an enquiry into the Brehon Law in the ambiguity of the meaning of the terms used : thus, to take a well-known example, the word 'fine' is used (1) to denote those related within certain degrees of consanguinity, (2) the lord and his relatives together with his dependent Ceiles and Fuidhirs, (3) the whole tribe in its broadest sense. The amount of con- fusion caused by this looseness of expression can be better imagined than described. In the preceding chapter the classes of society which appear to have been in existence at the time of the Brehon Laws were dealt with, and the more or less complete disuse of the original practice of common possession of the tribe-land was traced. Turning now to the period of the fullest development of the archaic code it is striking how seemingly complex a social system is revealed, when the simplicity of the tribal system as described by Sir John Davies so many centuries later is remembered. The native land law recognized by the Attorney-General of James the First will be dealt with in a subsequent chapter, but it is perhaps possible that the explanation of its apparent dis- crepancies with the scheme revealed in the Brehon Law is to be found in the fact that Sir John Davies was content to deal with the broad outlines of the case presented to him, while many of the provisions of the ancient laws were theoretical rather than practical. The ancient Irish land system, when viewed in the light of the Brehon Laws, shows the 'Tuath,' or territorial possession of the tribe, divided into the following parts ^ — (1) The ' Deis ' or lands of inheritance (orba). (2) Office or ' mensal ' lands. (3) ' Termon' lands — the possessions of the Church. (4) Pasture lands. (5) Arable lands. 1 Notice some remarks by tlie late supposed to be sacred even to an inno- Sir H. Maine in Early Law and Gus- vating Brehon. tovi on literary fosterage as exemplified ^ See Skene, Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. in the laws of Menu, poems of Homer 148. It is the territory to which by (taking Grote's theory) and the Brehon this time the word Tuath is properly laws. The Senchus Mor, however, was applied. The tribe is now ' Ciniol.' II.] THE BREHON LAW. 25 The first group, that is the lands of inheritance, stand upon a new basis altogether foreign to the theory of the primal tribal community, and are either (1) the private possessions of the Ri, as distinguished from the mensal lands which he held as the appanage of office, or (2) the private possessions of the Aires (or rather Flaths) which were either (a) ancient allodial lands\ or (/S) had become property in severalty by prescription, or (7) had been amassed by the Flath in the same manner as the Ri had gathered his more extensive possessions, or (S) had been granted as the reward of public service, or (e) had been granted originally for life, and not returned into the public stock on the death of the usufructuary. It is doubtful if these inheritance lands were governed by any real rules of descent save that of possession by members of one family as apart from the tribe ; and it is probable that they devolved by that most potent of all titles in troublous times, the right of might. On the death of the Flath, therefore, the most powerful member of his family would succeed to the lands ; while the ingrained notion of common ownership would be still so fixed in the other members that they would hold themselves in theory, if not in fact, joint possessors with him ; and submit- ting by force of circumstances to his nominal succession, w^ould gain a very practical share of the inheritance by quartering themselves upon him, and looking to him for support. Considerable stress may indeed be laid on this view of the family rights in inheritance lands, despite the fact that in the book of Aicill the rights of the Duthaig fine, that is, the group of the seventeen nearest kinsmen (divided into their four groups of Geilfine, Deirbhfine, larfine, and Indfine'^) to succeed to the Dibad, or inheritance land of the chief, are fully expressed, and their reciprocal rights elaborately defined. The whole arrangement of the Duthaig fine, though held by 1 It is certainly doubtful if the word received stock from the chief), and the allodial should be used, both on ac- receipt of the Taurcrech by the Ceile, count of the theoretical reversion of the these appearing to acknowledge some tribe and also on account of the pay- dominion by the chief. Compare Sul- ment of Bestigi by the Ceile to the livan, p. cxliii. chief (for even the Flath seems to have ^ a. L. of I. Vol. i. p. 261. 26 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. the late Sir Henry Maine to show signs of being developed from accustomed rules of family relationship \ is strikingly arti- ficial, and appears to be rather a learned Brehon's elaboration of what the rights of family succession should be, than of being a workable system of succession, more especially in troublous times and among a semi-barbarous community. Mr Skene calls attention also to the passage with which these rules end, "and the whole number of the seventeen men are then forth- coming, and if they be not, there shall be no partition but the nearest of kin shall take^:" if the next of kin happened to be powerful, judging from the record of bloodshed with which Irish history abounds, he would have been likely to take very practical measures to prevent the symmetrical Duthaig fine from interfering with his title to the inheritance^. Dealing with these lands of inheritance there is no more striking illustration of the unsettled state of the country than the apparent absence of even the germ of customary tenures. No sooner has the chief become possessed of private lands, and allowed the settlement upon them of servile dependents, than the gradual establishment of some base tenure similar to that of English copyhold might have been expected ; but while the existence of this servile class is one of the most prominent features of the early Irish society, there is no trace of any definite rights being gained by them: on the contrary, the large number of social outcasts, devoid of tribal rights, appears merely to have encouraged the growth of unlimited exactions by the chief The extent of the lands of inheritance would tend largely to increase as time went on, for the chief would employ his wealth in cattle in Saer and Daer stock loans to freemen occupying the tribe-land, and it seems certain that the rent payable in produce of stock and refections developed, at least in many cases, into rent payable for the land*. If the 1 Being apparently founded on a or tribe of the red-handed, composed of principle similar to the Eoman law those who had killed, or attempted to method as to the emancipation of sons kill the senior members of the fine in from the patria potestas. order to gain their property, is an illus- 2 Gelt. Scot. Vol. III. p. 178. tration of this. Sullivan, p. clxvi. 3 The existence too of the Dergfine, ^ ggg e. Hist, of Inst. p. 160. II.] THE BREHON LAW. 27 Ceile fell into arrears in his produce payments, and the stock originally advanced by the chief was either destroyed by disesuse or carried off by raiders, the easiest mode for the chieftain to recoup himself would be to appropriate the Ceile's allotment of tribe-land as a portion of the demesne, and to reduce the Ceile to the status of a villein cultivator: nor is the shadowy right of reversion existent in the tribe likely to have afforded any sufficient barrier to such action. There are also significant signs that a process similar to 'commendation' was not unknown as an operant factor in ex- tinguishing the original tribal freeman. One modern writer* appears to carry the view of the growth of a territorial basis of society so far as to hold that the original family ties are completely merged in the land-bond; pointing out that "the possession of Deis or inheritance land which gave its owner the title of Aire, was also essential to his acquiring the privi- leges of. the chief of a fine." Without being prepared to go quite to this length, it is certain that at the period of latest development of the Brehon Law the Ceile is found in a position in many ways assimilated to that of tenancy; the ' coyne, livery and cosherings ' to which he was liable bearing a strong resemblance to the onerous incidents of feudal tenure. It was doubtless the case nevertheless that the idea of tribal possession was deeply ingrained in the Celtic race at the time when Sir John Davies commuted the Irish tenures. However far in reality the steady march of time had advanced that feudalization of the land, which in Aryan races seems always to have gone hand in hand with increase of population and the growth of the power of the chief, the idea of landlord and tenant was still strange to the Irish mind and its com- pulsory imposition on an unwilling people was probably a fatal mistake. It is so evident that in the Ceile dependents of the chief is to be traced the germ of the relation of landlord and tenant, that an examination of the Brehon rules regulating the cattle loans, which brought the free tribesman into a subordinate position, is an essential preliminary to a right appreciation 1 See Skene's Celt. Scot. Vol in. p. 175. 28 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. of the nature of the Irish land system for which the English tenures were substituted. The two subtracts of the Senchus Mor in which the rules of these loans are dealt with are termed the Cain Sereath and the Cain Aigillne. From these it ap- pears that the usual period of a Saer-stock tenancy was seven years ; during this period the young of the cattle lent, the milk, and the manure, were taken by the chief The tenant did homage, rendered help in reaping the harvest and, if required, in repairing or building the castle {dun) of the chief or following his banner in war. There seems to have been no fixed rule as to the amount or frequency of the services to be rendered, and here as throughout the Brehon Laws there arises the appa- rent difficulty of the want of a sufficient sanction, for no penalty is specifically mentioned for the non-performance of these services, save that a seeming diminution in the honour price of the tenant took place on his default \ After the end of the seven years the cattle became the property of the Ceile. The chief appears to have always lent the stock without security, and though no tribesman was compelled to take stock from his immediate chief yet he had no power to refuse to do so from the Ri or king^ These stock tenancies were terminable at will by the return of the loan. If the chief reclaimed his cattle before the end of the agreed term and the Saer Ceile expressed willingness there- upon to hold as a Daer- stock tenant he either did so (an extra amount of cattle being granted him) or the chief was liable to forfeit one-third of the original stock lent^ Daer-stock tenure differed in many ways from the comparatively free tenure of the Saer Ceile ; the tribesman so holding received a larger amount of stock, and some security was required from him by the chief The stock advanced was made up of two portions, one being somewhat similar to that dealt with in Saer tenancy, that is to say being proportionate to the reserved rent in kind, and the other being estimated with regard to the 1 A. L. of I. Vol, III. Intro, p. xlix. apply to Daer-stock tenants, A. L. of 2 A passage in the Cain Aigillne I. Vol. ii. p. 223. seems to show that this rule did not ^ Intro, to Vol. ii. A. L. of I. p. xlix. II.] THE BREHON LAW. 29 honour price* of the tenant. The exact amount of the rent in kind varied, and the Cain Aigillne is full of elaborate regula- tions as to the amount of stock proportionate to particular food-rents. One example will show the nature of these rules, " the proportionate stock of a cow with its accompaniments is thirty ' seds,' besides the returnable seds" (that is to say twenty- four cows). Thus for such a loan of twenty-four cows the food- rent would be one cow and accompaniments^. The severity of the Daer-stock tenure, however, lay not in the food-rent, but in the services exacted from the tenant and in such incidents of the tenure as * refections.' Under this right of * refection ' the Irish chieftain came with his followers and quartered himself upon the unhappy Daer-stock holder, chief and retinue living at his expense. This right was probably of ancient origin ^ and is frequently alluded to in the Cain Aigillne, but from very early times it seems to have led to grave abuses. It was the pre- cursor of ' coyne, livery and cosherings,' forms of exaction which are bitterly denounced by Spenser and which were some of the chief causes of complaint on the part of the English settlers*. There are many provisions in the rules of Daer-stock tenancy tending to show that in some respects a sort of contractual relation on fairly equal terms, and with reciprocal rights and duties, was regarded as being created between the chief and the tenant^ These points are of interest as the after fate of the Daer-stock tenant was one of complete servitude, and it is therefore important to notice that by the rules of the Brehon Law he should have been in no small degree protected. Thus, theoretically it was possible for the Daer Ceile, without 1 That is the price paid for injuring cess see a letter of Sir H. Sydney's to him. Queen Elizabeth (Sydney Papers). 2 A. L. of I. Vol. II. p. 261. There is an allusion to coyne and ^ The customary entertainments livery in Baron Finglas' Breviate of given by the tenant to the chief are Ireland (quoted in Harris' Hibernica) treated in the Corus Bescna under the which is a proof of the light in which head of ' human feasts' — and in them these exactions were regarded, it states originated many abuses afterwards that " they would destroy Hell if they included under cess. A. L. of I. were used in the same." Intro. Vol. III. p. xlviii. s gge preface A. L. of I. Vol. ii. 4 For an account of the exaction of p. lii. 30 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. the consent of the chief, to terminate the relation between them by returning double the stock and seds, and paying a double food-rent for the year in which they were so returned; again, if the chief determined the tenancy without due cause he had to forego his right to one-third of the stock and returnable seds, and to forfeit one year's food-rent ; while if the chief insulted the tenant in withdrawing the stock the Daer holder was allowed in addition to retain that portion representing his honour price. Other rules provided for double food-rent be- coming due if the tenant neglected his duties, while he was excused payment in cases of poverty \ At the end of seven years on the death of the chief the cattle became the property of the tenant ; while if the tenant died within the term the chief was able to claim a submission from his co-heirs. Before leaving the subject of lands of inheritance it is im- portant to notice that in the later periods of the Brehon Law this separate property appears to have been distinctly recog- nized, and the power of disposing of it not to have been in any way fettered. The mode of disposal, however, presents both curious and characteristic traits, for, unlike most archaic systems, the consensual relations of the contracting parties rather than the formalities observed by them in carrying out the transfer, are looked to as constituting the binding matter. The mode of disposing of land, moreover, seems to have presented few differ- ences from the informal transfers of personal property. The traces of a basis of contract in the relations of early Irish society to the land are of much interest ; not only as a great contrast to most archaic theory, but also in view of the events of modem history, when the application of a system of free contract to Irish land was treated as the panacea for the accu- mulated evils of centuries. The ' Mensal ' lands descended by the custom of Tanistry as the appanage of office, and here again the claims of power are prominent. Despite the nominally elective nature of the chief- 1 See A. L. of I. Intro. Vol. ii. p. li. on the keen sense of wrong felt by the and Hi. Bearing in mind the curious tenants in after times on capricious vitality of old-established ideas these evictions and evictions for non-pay- provisions possibly throw some light ment of rent when caused by poverty. II.] THE BREHON LAW. 31 taincy (which even in its latest development was elective in the individual though hereditary in the family) might constituted the pre-eminent title. The king once chosen, the Tanaist seems always to have been selected from that branch of the family which came next in power : for example, as pointed out by Mr Skene "the sovereignty over the whole of Ireland fell for several centuries into one branch of the great family called the Northern Hy Neill and the throne was filled alternately from two branches of it\" The mode of succession by Tanistry was not a feature peculiar to the Irish tribe, for customs analogous to it are to be traced in many other races. A prominent example of this is pointed out by Mr Justice Field ^ in the mode of succession to the Raj existing in many parts of India, where on the decease of the Rajah the succession goes not to his son but to the eldest male of the family. In this case also the same distinction is drawn between lands which are the appanage of office and those which are the private property of the Rajah ^. Mensal lands were originally intended to supply the chief with the necessary regal state, but the principle seems to have eventually been extended, and lands were set apart for the support of the public officers of the community such as the Bard, Brehon, Historian, etc. In later times the revenue of the chiefs was far more derived from the "cuttings, cosherings and other Irish exactions, whereby they did spoil and impoverish the people at their pleasure ^" than from the genuine products of their Mensal lands. All the lands of whatever kind held by the Church are grouped under the heading of Termon lands, so called, accord- ing to Sir John Davies, " because they were ever free from all impositions and cuttings of the temporal lords, and had the privilege of sanctuary." The Brehon Law recognized the claim of the Church to tithes, firstfruits, and firstlings, under which last head a most curious development of tenure arose: the firstborn son was claimed as a right by the Church, and though he obtained his equal share of the family property he held it as 1 Gelt. Scot. Vol. III. p. 150. prevailing amongst the Scottish Celts. 2 Judge of the High Court in Bengal. ^ Sir John Davies' Discoverie of 3 Field p. 242 (note), and see also Ireland, p. 169. Sir H. Maine as to similar customs 32 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. a Saer-stock tenant from the Church. It is probable that this right was not generally exacted, but it stands entirely alone as an instance of clerical power, and it is perhaps a justifiable theory that some of the Church lands were obtained as gifts in consideration of not enforcing this demand. The Church lands were in the first place probably granted by the tribe from the common stock, and the Brehon Law recog- nizes to a very remarkable extent the claims of 'the tribe of the Saint' to support. The most important influence exerted by the Church on the system of land holding is that it un- doubtedly did much, from more or less selfish ends, to aid free alienation of land. The Corns Bescna shows that in the case of acquisitions the Church had made great inroads on the re- strictions imposed on alienation by the tribal system ; and that even in allotments a successful attack had been made on the original inviolability of tribal possession, as far as regards alienation to the Church. There is a curious similarity between the structure of the religious bodies and the primitive theory of the clan. The subdivision of the religious organization shows the same aggre- gate of septs, and the growth and development of each religious body appears to have exactly resembled the progress of the secular tribe. We find this assimilation to the general model even in the fragments of the tribe, the very Fuidhir tenants, and the servile groups generally, seeming instinctively to have moulded themselves in the general form, so it is perhaps not remarkable that the religious community was framed on the same lines. The relation of the Church to the tenants of ecclesiastical land is closely analogous to the dealings of the chief with the tribesman to whom he supplied stock, and the Saer Manaich and Daer Manaich holders are the exact equivalent of the Saer and Daer stock holders of the temporal community. It is far from unlikely that the extent to which lands were granted to the Church, and the way in which the original strictness of the tribal rules as to alienation were relaxed in her favour, may be traced to the fact that the pos- session of lands by a corporation, the existing members of which were probably allied by blood to the secular tribe, seemed a II.] THE BREHON LAW. 33 very different thing from permitting ready alienation of land to all the members of the tribe, a course which might tend to pass the lands into the keeping of a temporal enemy. The ingrained theory of tribal ownership and the absence of any real concep- tion of tenure in the way in which the word is now used, would prevent those objections to Mortmain, which would at once occur to those trained under the feudal system, from possessing weight. The artificiality of construction shown in the similarity of the terms and ideas used in the religious clan to those used in the secular tribe must also have had the effect of strengthen- ing the apparent unity of the two bodies, and so have lessened the antagonism to alienation. It must, however, be borne in mind that this analogy to tribal organization is not confined to the structure of the early Irish Church, but is also to be traced in many early forms of guilds and partnerships, associations which are now considered as springing solely from contract ; and it has been argued that barrenness of imagination and the slow generation of ideas is responsible for the similarity, and is a distinguishing characteristic of the archaic community\ Passing from the Termon lands to those still held in common by the secular tribe, under a more or less modified form of the original tribal ownership, they fall naturally into two divisions: — (1) The Common Pasturage, open to every free tribesman for the use of his cattle. In this is to be traced the origin of some of the common lands, which in later times afforded one of the subjects of contention between the landlord class and the peasant holders. Two theories of the origin of commons are advanced, termed respectively the legal and the historical I The former^ traces them to grants from the lord ; while accord- ing to the latter" their origin is to be found in the decay of the Mark or Teutonic village community of freemen cultivating their lands in common. It is evident that neither of these theories is completely applicable to the Irish land system. The Celtic community of the Brehon Laws is found thoroughly 1 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 229 and 232. 3 For an ingenious advocacy of which 2 See an article by Mr Scrutton see Seebohm's English Village Gomrnu- in Law Quarterly Review 1887, also riity. See also Blackstone, Vol. ii. p. 92. Mr Scrutton's Yorke Prize Essay on * See Digby's History of Real Pro- Commons and Common Fields. perty Law, 3rd ed. p. 155 et seq. M. 3 34 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. started on an agricultural structure of open fields, and common tillage \ with the power of the chief greatly developed, but yet not having attained the recognized position necessary to make him ultimate reversionary owner of the lands, or the head of a manorial community. For a land system in this archaic state was suddenly substituted in the reign of James the First the fully developed feudal system with all lands held by tenure from the lord. Commons, therefore, which were at this time recognized, were clearly not derived from any grant from the lord, but existed either as the survival of the old rights of common user by the members of the tribal community, or were created by the English lawyers in the methodical plans on which the various territorial settlements were based; while any power exercised by the lord in such lands trenches on pre- existing rights instead of extending them. This fact would not have precluded the subsequent creation of commons by grant had a recognized system of manorial colonies grown up. There is no trace, however, of this development : the lowest tenants remained fixed in a state of servile dependency ; and the origin of the common lands (the enclosure of which was in later times so bitterly resented by the Irish peasantry as to give rise to the forcible resistance of the ' Levellers ') may therefore be ascribed partially to the portions of land in common ownership which were retained by the English lawyers as commons after the destruction of the tribal system, and which were regulated and limited by such statutes as 16 Car. I.^ but rarely extended; and partially to rights of user acquired in the lands which at the time of the English settlements were left as unappropriated wasted (2) The Arable Lands, or common tillage, which were held in more or less permanent allotments by the members of the tribe, the allottee being merely entitled to the usufruct. To the allotment of such lands the possession of cattle was generally, if not always, a condition precedent ; as also to the right to 1 There are passages in the Brehon ^ These rights in their inception Law showing the existence of common probably resembling common pur cause ploughing. de vicinage. 2 c. 33. II.] THE BREHON LAW. 35 possess a habitation in the township. It was to these lands, and to the Gavelkind rules which regulated the succession to them, that the attention of the English lawyers of the reign of James the First was most directed. If the statements of the Brehon Law, which point strongly to the existence of individual property, are compared with the statements of Sir John Davies, who seems to have considered separate property (with the exception of the chiefs demesnes) as non-existent, the difference between the two views of the same system is certainly remarkable. The truth lies proba- bly somewhere between the two, and the manner in which Sir John Davies regarded the holdings can be accounted for by the fact that his attention was doubtless most attracted by the portion of the system most foreign to English notions ; nor is there any doubt that the rules of Gavelkind did apply to by far the largest portion of the Irish lands. According to these rules, as has been said, on the death of one of the sept his lands returned again into the common stock, and the " Canfinny " made a redistribution. In this distribution bastards were in- cluded, but no woman was entitled to a share. The arguments against the Irish system of Gavelkind, on the strength of which by a decision of all the judges the custom was abolished, will be treated of later under the celebrated "Case of Gavelkind": it is only necessary here to point out that far from being radically different from the Kentish custom it was in reality merely a more archaic form of the same usage, and that under it an undoubted right to the soil was vested in each member of the sept. An example of such a sept is quoted by Mr Seebohm from the State Papers of James the First ; it con- sisted of " 124 persons nearly all bearing the surname of Grame. They were divided into families, 17 of which were set down as possessed of £20 and upwards, 4 of £10 and upwards, 6 of the poorer sort, 6 of no abilities, while as dependents there were 4 servants of the name of Grame, and about a dozen irregular hangers on\" Allusion has been made to the heavy exactions by the chief recognized under the Brehon Law, and much of the abuse of the '■ English Villaye Community, p. 219. 3—2 36 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. English critics of the Brehon system, headed by Spenser \ is levelled at them. Such exactions as the " eric " composition for murder, which is perhaps the one which both most attracted and biased the criticisms of the English writers, are not within the scope of this enquiry; but there were certain customs mainly in the nature of the exactions of food supply by the chief and his followers, which demand particular notice. These customs were perhaps neither very unnatural nor very serious in their inception, but they increased to an alarming extent as cen- tury after century of war rolled by, and the English colonists both adopted them as a ready means of exacting spoil from their dependents, and also it would seem increased their severity. Under the early tribal system, where the chief was regarded as the father of the community, these payments probably repre- sented no great hardship, being exacted in a very intermittent manner and with some show of consideration ; but in the hands of the degenerate English and the debased race of warlike adventurers, who in later times represented the Irish chief- taincy, they became terrible engines of oppression, and were adopted as a means of raising money even within the Colony of the Pale. The growth of these exactions has usually been ascribed to the abuse of power by the Norman settlers who, even when they had degenerated into tribal chieftains, were deemed to have been out of sympathy with the class ruled. An explanation which was offered by Dr Sullivan and adopted by the late Sir H. Maine is more probable, namely, that it was owing to the great increase of the Fuidhir tenants (a natural result of warlike times) who were in a state of servile depend- ence, and to whose outcast condition no tribal immunities attached. These exactions are met with in many forms and under 1 There is a marked bitterness of was embittered by the failure of his tone in Spenser's View of the State of venture. A striking proof of the up- Ireland, though it bears every trace of heavals of society undergone on the being in the main a truthful state- resettlements of Irish land is found in ment. He was himself a colonist the fact that a descendant of Spenser (receiving an allotment of some 3,000 was ejected from this allotment under acres on the plantation of the Desmond the Cromwellian settlement, estates) and it is not unlikely that he il] the brehon law. 37 various names, but they are all of a very similar character, consisting of a levy of food, usually exacted in primitive fashion by the chief and his followers quartering themselves for a more or less lengthy period on the tenant. There appears little doubt that their origin lay in the tribal obli- gation to support the chief, but they certainly afterwards developed into something closely resembling the incidents of tenure, and were always regarded in this latter light by the English settlers. In very early times Bonaght^ (that is, money, food and entertainment for his soldiers, and forage for their horses) was exacted by the chief at pleasure, and the later de- velopment of the same custom is found in the coyne and livery* alluded to in the Irish statutes as a " damnable custom," and regarded with such fervent hatred by the English settlers*. Ancient exactions of a similar nature to ' Bonaght ' were ' Sorohen,' ' Kernetty,' * Gillycone,' ' Mosyorowne,' ' Gillen- inny,' and the levy of ' South ' which we find constantly alluded to in the History of the Colony of the Pale under the name of ' cuttings '. ' Coshery,' an exaction of provisions and lodgings for himself and his retinue levied by the chief, is met with again and again until the reign of James the First; and * Refection,' a similar custom (though in its original form con- fined to a right of the lord to be entertained for one night), expanded into a most heavy burden on the tenant*. 'Cess' was the name given to an English exaction founded on the Irish model, which appears to have been first established in the reign of Edward the Second, and consisted of a tax of five marks on every ploughland discretionally levied under the pretence of prerogative by the chief governors of Ireland for the support of themselves and the soldiers in garrison ^ 1 This was of two kinds, Bonaght •'' John Cottrell was put to death Bur and Bonaght Beg, the former "because he had introduced and being at the discretion of the lord, the practised many grievous, foreign and latter according to agreement. Ware, intolerable laws." Vol. II. p. 74. 4 Notice also a provision of drink 2 Maurice Fitz Thomas is stated to termed ' satellitum poturae,' the ex- have been the first of the English to actions termed 'Cuddies' and *Shragh impose this tax, doing so in the time and Mart.' Ware, Vol. ii. p. 74 and 75. of Edward II. ^ Jq the reign of Elizabeth we find 38 THE BKEHON LAW. [CHAP. It would be impossible to overrate the evil effects of these levies. They utterly prevented proper cultivation of the land, as the tillers of the soil saw the fruits of their labour liable to be snatched from them at any time. They diminished the estimation of all honest industry, to so great an extent that fre- quently the free members of the sept would not work, lest their having done so should lower them in the opinion of the chief, and cause them to be excluded from the partition of tribal lands in Gavelkind. A further expansion of the same idea being seen in the class of descendants of a chief, who, when prevented from living by a system of wholesale plunder, would rather perish miserably than stoop to what they deemed menial pursuits. Special attention is drawn to these exactions from the fact that they were the moral justification advanced for the complete substitution of English tenures for the Brehon system. That, as has been stated, they constituted a most crying evil is doubt- less true, but perhaps it is often forgotten that the English law which was substituted for them was neither a very enlightened nor a very humane institution : for example, the eric fine is certainly repugnant to notions of right, and is palpably open to abuse in the hands of the wealthy and unscrupulous ^ but the penal code substituted for it would nowadays be considered a flagrant evil. It is almost certain also that there was a dis- tinction between the free tenant and the fuidhir settled on the waste as regards the liability to the exactions of food levies, and that the rights of the former have often been .confused with the servile liabilities of the latter. When dealing with the substitution of the English for the Brehon Law one is struck with the entire variance which the two systems seem to represent, and it is hard to realize that they are in reality merely different stages of development of kindred institutions, and that " the germs of feudalism lay deep in the more ancient Irish social structure." The Brehon Laws certainly show^ a system to which the notion of feudal owner- ship is completely foreign ; but, as has been shown, these primi- tive tribal conceptions had been greatly modified, and the pre- a protest against the increase of this ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 170. tax. See Ware, Vol. ii. p. 77. II.] THE BREHON LAW. 39 eminent power of the chief would seem to have been in some respects a greater evil than the summary feudalization of the land. Spenser, whose account, if prejudiced, is yet seldom really inaccurate, states that the chiefs ''use most shamefully to racke their tenants, laying upon them coin and livery at pleasure, and exacting of them besides their covenants what he pleaseth\" and Sir John Davies stated that " the lord was an absolute tyrant and the tenant a very slave*." 1 Spenser, p. 57. ^ Sir J. Davies' Discoverie, p. 179. CHAPTER III The Colony of the Pale (from Henry II. to Henry VH.). The influence of the more advanced civilization of foreign nations was little felt by the early Irish laws and institutions; and the various predatory incursions, which in early times ravaged the coasts of Ireland, left no permanent mark on the tribal system of land-holding, the Norse land system indeed differing but little from the Irish. From the time of Henry the Second of England, however, a new feature was introduced by the appearance of feudal tenures. It is true that though nominally spread all over the country it was only — until the time of Elizabeth — within a comparatively limited area that these tenures for any length of time held sway ; still from the latter part of the twelfth century, some portion of the land of Ireland was always so held. The two systems of land-holding, Brehon and feudal, existed side by side; but save where the latter had been imposed by force of arms, it gained no converts from the native race, and failed to alter their ideas of the relation of the occupier to the land. On the other hand the Brehon Law secured many adherents from among the English invaders. The causes of this were various. As Mr Froude observes, " the Irish Celts possess on their own soil a power greater than any known family of mankind of assimilating those who venture among them to their own image \" and the intermarriages of the English settlers'* with the native popu- 1 The English in Ireland, VoL i. p. daughter of Dermot Mac Murrough, 21. and his followers also largely con- * Strongbow married Eva, the tracted Irish marriages. CHAP. III.] THE COLONY OF THE PALE. 41 lation created a class of Anglo-Irish who, bom in the country and imbued with the native ideas, were galled by the re- strictions of the feudal tenures by which their lands were held*. The customs of Gavelkind and Tanistry also attracted the younger sons and bastards, whom the strict rules of feudal descent excluded from a share in the inheritance'"^. In result, until the time of James the First, save in the Colony of the Pale^, the feudal tenures did not hold, and in no way modified the Brehon rules which were observed in the rest of Ireland. It was pointed out by the late Sir Henry Maine'' that to the existence of the English Colony, we are indebted for much of the archaic nature of the Brehon Law being preserved to so late a date in history as it was. The Colony " acting as a running sore" prevented the internal disturbances of Ireland from self-adjustment by the natural process of the merger of all lesser states in one great master kingdom. Had such arisen it would have established a centralized government, and thus by endowing the Brehon Code with the force of more certain judicial sanctions would have greatly modified the loosely administered and in many cases conflicting laws, and even in the end have changed the theory of land-holding by the simple process of development. The English invasion of Ireland took place towards the latter part of the reign of Henry the Second (though it is evident by the Bull obtained from Adrian the Fourth in 1155^ 1 There is ample proof that they a double ditch, six feet high *on the regarded with even more dislike than side which meared next to the Irish- did the native Irish, the aids, reliefs, man' (see Field, p. 249). In the earlier &c. of the feudal tenures. periods of English rule the district 2 Primogeniture, however, though occupied by the English was termed by this time fairly established as a * the land of Ireland.' characteristic of the feudal system, was ^ E. Hist, of Inst., pp. 54 and 55. not a feature of the early feud, which ^ This Bull reserved a payment of descended to all the sons equally, while Peter's pence to Kome, and was in from Glanville we know that as late as fact a bold attempt to make Ireland Henry II. land held in socage frequently a spiritual fee — it was confirmed by descended to all the sons equally. Alexander III. The Papal claim of 3 The term * Colony of the Pale ' right to make this grant was based on arose from the provision of Poyning's the forged donation of Constantine, law (1494) which enjoined on the which gave all islands to the see of English colony the maintenance of Kome. 42 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. that Henry had early* meditated a descent upon that country) when, urged by the tempting bribes offered by Dermot Mac Murrough to those who would assist him to recover the kingship of Leinster, an expedition of Norman and Welsh adventurers landed in Ireland in May, 1169^ The command of this expedition was ultimately assumed by Richard de Clare, Earl of Pembroke, better known as Strongbow, who landed near Waterford with some 1200 men and 200 knights on the eve of St Bartholomew, 1170. Besides many small tribes there were at this time five principal sovereignties in Ireland, Munster, Leinster, Meath, Ulster, and Connaught, the leader of the most powerful of these being termed monarch of Ireland, and holding Meath as an appanage of office. This post was then occupied by Roderic O'Connor, king of Connaught, against whom the efforts of the English expedition were directed. Strongbow was successful in gaining the more or less complete possession of Dublin, Meath, Leinster, and Water- ford as far as Dungarvan; but the expedition, which at first had the countenance of the English king, ere long incurred his displeasure. Strongbow, finding his supplies from England cut off, and his precarious position in Ireland rendered practi- cally untenable, offered to Henry the lands he had won^. After some delay, and after an interview had taken place at Gloucester between the Earl and the King, Henry accepted the surrender of Dublin and all other ports and fortresses then (or to be) conquered in Ireland, and granted to the Earl 1 Henry is sometimes thought to with the following letter, "My sove- have originally intended Ireland for reign lord, I came into this land, and his brother William, for whom no (if I remember aright) with your per- pro vision had been made by their late mission, for the purpose of restoring father (see Moore's Hist, of Ireland, your liegeman Dermot Mac Murrough, Vol. II. p. 205). William the Con- and whatsoever the favour of fortune queror had planned the conquest of has bestowed upon me, whether from Ireland, William Eufus had had simi- his patrimony or from any other lar designs. See Pearson, p. 520 quot- source, as to your generous munifi- ing A. S. Chron. and Girald. Camb. cence I owe it all, so shall it all return 2 This date is sometimes given as to you, and be placed at the disposal 1170. of your absolute will and pleasure. '^ Strongbow first despatched Kay- See Moore, Vol. ii. p. 235. mond Le Gros to Henry in Normandy III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 43 and his heirs for ever all his other acquisitions, to be held as fiefs of the English crown. From this period dates the authority of the English monarchs over Ireland, and the exist- ence of the feudal tenures in that country. In October 1171 \ Henry himself landed in Ireland with 500 knights and about 4000 men ; the chief event of his stay of importance as affecting the land law of Ireland being the holding of a Curia Regis at Lismore'^ at which Council it is stated that the laws of England were accepted under oath by those present ^ It is probably incorrect, however, to imagine that the English law was ever intended to apply to the mass of native Irish ; for at the Synod of Cashel the Irish clergy were specially exempted from the payment of the eric fine*, and from coyne and coshering — provisions which would be meaningless unless such incidents of the Irish land system had been contemplated as remaining in force amongst the native race^ In support of this view it is noticeable that when a confirmatory grant of the laws and customs of England was given by John, and again by Henry the Third, it was confined to such of the Irish as became liege subjects; also there are large numbers of Royal grants of naturalization made upon petition to the offspring of Anglo-Irish marriages, giving them the benefit of the English laws and franchises I Henry's ^ This date is often stated to be Oct. is made among the lay people, for any 1172, but see Dr O'Connor's criticisms murther, that no person of the clergy on Leland, Rer. Hib. scrip., torn. ii. (though he be kin to any of the parties) cxv.; see also Lord Lyttelton's Life of shall contribute anything thereto, but Henry II. , Field, p. 244. Girald. Camb. as they be guiltless from the murther, gives date as 1172. so shall they be free from payment of 2 Whatever laws were enacted at this mony, for any such earick or release time are lost, but we find an allusion for the same." See Cox's History of to one of the statutes passed by Henry Ireland, p. 23, and Giraldus Cambreu- in 2 Rich. III. c. 8. sis. Rolls Series, Vol. v. ch. 35, p. 3 "Sed rex pater, antequam ab Hy- 281. hernia rediret, apud Lissemor conci- ^ Thomas Moore's History of Ire- lium congregavit, ubi leges Angliae ab land, Vol. ii. pp. 258, 259. omnibus sunt gratanter acceptae, et, ^ See Warner's History of Ireland, juratoria cautione praestita confirma- p. 93, and Moore, Vol. ii. p. 332 (note), tae." Matth. Paris. " Historia An- says, "among the records of the Irish glorum." Rolls Series, Vol.i. p. 371. Rolls office are many of these licenses •* "That when earick or composition granted to particular Irish to use the 44 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. object was not so much to regulate the customs and manner of the minor and native Irish holdings, as to obtain a public ratification of his feudal lordship from the English settler barons, and from the more important Irish chieftains. Never- theless all the laws enacted by him when in Ireland followed the feudal polity, and the estates he granted were in con- sideration of homage, fealty, and military or honorary service; the grantees under tenures then created being tenants in capite, examples being the tenure on which Strongbow re- ceived the principality of Leinster, and Hugh de Lacy the seigniory of Meath\ It should be remembered that the English feudal system of this date was a more complete engine of monarchical power than continental feudalism, which possessed a weak point in the absence of immediate relation between the tenant of a mesne lord and the feudal sovereign. William, on the conquest of England, utilized the existence of the 'trinoda necessitas' as a lever for remedying this blot^ and by the time of Henry the Second the doctrine that where land was held of a mesne lord, the service was due to the king, was firmly established; the form of homage adopted after the Conquest to create the feudal tie between a mesne lord and his tenant always containing a saving of the allegiance due to the king. The system in Ireland was, however, in many cases different ^ The large English laws, some of them being Irish crown, and by this grant Hugh de women whose husbands were English." Lacy obtained about 800,000 acres, Attention is also called to the careful held by the tenure of fifty knights' exclusion of the native Irish as a mass service. The Baronial Courts held from English privileges. A grant is within this area eventually became so quoted of English privileges to two powerful that they were suppressed as Irishmen, given in the Close Koll 37 interfering with the rights of the crown, Henry III., where the writ especially see Moore's History of Ireland. This states that this favour was granted large grant was evidently made with them "notwithstanding that they were a view to counterbalancing the power Irish," Vol. III. p. 22. Notice also two of Strongbow. records, viz. 2 Ed. III. Claus. Membr. ^ Notice the oath at Sarum, a.d. 17, and 28 Ed. III. quoted in the 1086. ' Case of Tanistry.' Davies' Keports, ^ For example in the cases of Strong- p. 103. bow and de Lacy, and later in the 1 Meath, as the former appanage of cases of the Butlers and Geraldines. Irish Koyalty, had passed to the English III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 45 grants which Henry made were grants which carried also the privileges of a county Palatine \ and gave to the grantee the right of civil and criminal jurisdiction independent of the crown '^ The lord of such a fee could enfeoff tenants to hold of himself, escheats for treason accrued to him instead of to the crown, and the king's process ranged only in the church lands I Henry did not assume the title of king of Ireland, but seems to have been satisfied with being acknowledged a sort of * paramount power".' It has been asserted, and is not unlikely, that much of the readiness with which the Irish chieftains sub- mitted to him was due to the fact that they merely understood the feudal bond as binding them to a general support of the king by military service, and were in complete ignorance of the change in the title to their lands which the subtle and intricate system of the Norman lawyers deduced from the apparently simple ceremony of homage and fealty. Mr Pearson says " From the English point of view, the kings of England were henceforth lords-paramount of Ireland, with the fee of the soil vested in them, and all Irish princes in future were no more than tenants-in-chief From the Irish point of view, the Eng- lish kings were nothing more than military suzerains in the districts outside the Pale''." Roderic O'Connor, though crippled in power by the con- quests of Strongbow and reduced to treat for peace, was still far from conquered at the time when the English king visited Ireland, and it is probable that steps would have been taken to reduce him to subjection had not the investigation then pending into the death of Becket forced Henry to return home in April 11 72^ Ireland was then, in name at least, completely conquered, 1 In the proceedings of the Irish enter all franchises for the apprehen- Parliament in 1467 among the un- sion of felons or traitors. printed statutes is one enacting that ^ It is noticeable that even the the Palatine liberty of Meath, despite Leinster provinces of Strongbow, its merger in the crown by inherit- though acquired in right of his wife, ance, should continue. were surrendered and reconveyed in 2 Hallam's Const. Hist., Vol. iii. feudal form. chapter 18, p. 347. ^ jjig^^ ^y ^j^g^ during Early and ^ But by the statute of Kilkenny Middle Ages, Vol. i. p. 531. the king's sheriffs were entitled to t^ Whence it is said he sent a 'modus 46 tHE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. Ulster alone being admittedly unsubdued. In 1175 a treaty was concluded at Windsor between Henry and the emissaries of Roderic, by which Roderic, in consideration of having done homage and undertaking an annual tribute for himself and the Irish at large of one merchantable hide for every tenth head of cattle killed in Ireland outside the English provinces, was to hold his lands peaceably, as a king under Henry, and to have dominion over all Ireland save the then English possessions of Dublin, Meath, Leinster and Waterford\ provided he remained faithful and preserved his covenants ^ If Roderic regarded this treaty but lightly the English king also seems not to have felt in the least fettered by it, and it is probable that he had from the first only regarded it as another means of asserting his paramount suzerainty over the whole of Ireland : for despite its provisions "all Ireland was by Henry the Second cantonized amongst ten of the English nation, and though they did not gain possession of one-third of the kingdom, yet in title they were owners and lords of all, as nothing was left to be granted to the natives ^" The policy of Henry is evident; he intended that the feudal grantees should subdue this turbulent kingdom, and in serving their own ends establish also the dominion of the English kings over the whole of Ireland. One cannot but wonder that the far-sighted scheme was not fulfilled in history. That the de- scendants of the chivalry, which only a hundred years before tenendi Parliamenta ' to Ireland, but ei tributum : totam illam terrain .. the authority and antiquity of this habitatores terrae habeat sub se ; .. document cannot be maintained despite Justitiae ut tributum Kegi Angliae the championship of it by Sir Edward integre persolvant, per manum ejus Coke. sua jura sibi conservent, .. illi qui 1 Waterford that is to say as far as modo tenent, teneant in pace, quamdiu Dungarvan. manserint in fidelitate Eegis AngHae, 2 Quod Kex Angliae concedit prae- .. fideliter .. integre persolverint tribu- dicto Roderico, Ligeo homini suo tum, .. alia jura sua quae ei debent, Kegnum Conaciae, quamdiu ei fideliter per manum Regis Conaciae, salvo in serviet, ut sit Rex sub eo, paratus ad omnibus jure .. honore Domini Regis servitium suum, sicut homo suus .. ut Angliae .. suo, etc. etc. — Cox's Hist. teneat terram suam ita bene, .. in pace, of I. page 29. sicut tenuit, antequam Dominus Rex ^ Sir John Davies' Discoverie, p. Angliae intravit Hiberniam reddendo 137,— and see Field, p. 244, 245. III.] FROM HENRY IT. TO HENRY VII. 47 rode rough-shod over Saxon England, and a century and a half before that wrested Normandy from "Frank Noblesse and Romanesque provincials," carving so goodly a heritage with the sword, should have failed for centuries to subdue an uncivilized people, is in many ways remarkable. The Irish, despite their valour, were most contemptible adversaries to Norman disci- pline, and that civilization should have failed to follow the victorious banner is a curious problem. Stranger still is it to find that as time went on not only did the English power in Ireland wane, and the limits of the Colony of the Pale become more and more contracted, but also that the glamour of the Celt was over all the land; that proud de Burgh and courtly Geraldine had become mere tribal chieftains^; that the Butlers ruled but as half civilized petty kings; and that the descendants of the frugal, scholarly, priest-army of the Conqueror William had sunk to lives of debauchery and rapine. The children of a race who had written their laws in blood on the English statute book threw oft' the shackles of the system their ancestors had so laboriously welded, and assimilated themselves to the social condition and primitive land system of the Brehon Law to such an extent that the law of England was never " properly applied unto the Irish nation as of a purposed plot of government^" until James the First. In May 1177 Henry (having obtained a permissive Bull from Pope Alexander the Third) in Council at Oxford con- stituted John, a child of eleven, king of Ireland^ ; the Legate Vivianus having shortly before this held a Synod at Dublin in which he published the king's title. The Prince, however, is always termed merely Lord of Ireland and Earl of Moreton. The 1 Land System of Ireland^ O'Connor The matter was mooted before the Morris, L. Q. R. 1887, p. 137. English judges in the decision on the 2 Spenser's View and perfect Bis- precedent of the Staple Act (2 Hen. covery of Ireland, edition 1633, p. 10. VI.). Chief Justice Coke, Sir J. Davies 3 This donation of Ireland to John and Molyneux have all treated at has given rise to many controversies length of the matter, and reference (1) as to whether it created Ireland a should be made to Sir J. Davies' separate kingdom from England, (2) speech in 1613 when Speaker of the as to whether it prevented the laws of Irish House of Commons. See Moore, England being binding on Ireland. Vol. ii. p. 329. 48 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. feudal grants before made by Henry were confirmed with alterations by new charters under which the lands were gene- rally held from John instead of from the king\ These grants, however, are very inconsistent, Henry's opinion of the wisdom of the step he had taken in constituting John king of Ireland seeming to vary from time to time. Frequently the appoint- ment appears to have been altogether disregarded : there are grants by Henry, subsequent to the Council at Oxford, in which lands are granted to be held of himself alone and his heirs, while others grant by tenure from him and John and their heirs I Grants of fiefs not formerly existing were also made at this time^ (many of which were never more than nominal, the grantees failing to reduce them to subjection), and the policy of Henry for the subjection of the land was followed by his grantees who largely subinfeudated their possessions. In 1185 John, then only nineteen years of age, landed at Waterford with a considerable force. His stay, which might have ended in the complete subjection of the Irish, was really the commencement of that decay of the English power which left the Colony of the Pale at the close of the fifteenth century possessed of merely a strip of land round Dublin. The offence given by the Prince and his followers to the Irish tributary chiefs, the impolitic resumption of the royal demesnes, and the unjust and shameful expedition of Philip of Worcester into Ulster, sowed the seeds of wide-spread revolt and suc- cessful retaliation; whilst the recall of John and the appoint- ment of de Courcy as governor came too late to be availing. The succession of Richard the First to the English crown did not interfere with the nominal lordship or kingship of John over Ireland, and for the next hundred years the history of this unhappy country is a record of bloodshed and rapine. The English settlers strove by force to gain possession of the broad lands so glibly granted them, and "they built castles and made freeholds but no tenures or services were reserved to the crown"*;" while both the Irish chieftains and English 1 e.g. The new grant of Meath to ^ e.g. The grant of Limerick or Hugh de Lacy. North Munster. 2 See Moore, Vol. ii. p. 330. 4 ggg Field, p. 245. III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 49 lords warred amongst themselves as well as against one another. As still further extending the titular claims of the English to the Irish soil a surrender should be noticed in 1205 by Cathal, son of Roderic, to John. This arrangement finally abandoned the violated treaty of Windsor, delivered to the English crown two-thirds of Connaught, and acknowledged John's lordship over the remainder by the annual payment of one hundred marks\ In 1210 John, this time in the full dignity of King of England, but under the ban of ex- communication, again visited Ireland, and received the homage of many Irish princes and settler barons. To this date is ascribed the division of the English provinces into shires and counties; and it is also stated that an abstract of the laws and customs of England was placed in the Exchequer at Dublin. An allusion to this gift of the English laws is con- tained in the writ of 11 Hen. III.^, but as has been before stated neither of these grants seems to have had any real application to the native Irish ^ The visit of John, as indeed the whole of his reign, advanced but little the summary feudalization of the main body of Ireland. Within the English colony, however, the feudal system was fully followed, at any rate in its most onerous incidents, for there are many writs of this reign extant demanding 'consilium et auxilium*'. The reign of Henry the Third of England produced also but little benefit; the Irish Charter proved a worthless gift, and was never intended to reach the case of the native race. A variety of new grants in feudal form^ are noticeable, chief among which is that of the whole of Connaught to Richard ^ John was allowed, it would seem, by a landlord within the Pale seems to choose his portions from the best to be under Stat. West. 2nd (13 of the province. See letter to Meiler Edw. I.) which gave a right to a writ Fitz-Henry, quoted by Leland, Vol. i. of cessavit against the tenant for two p. 175. years' default in the reserved services. 2 See Cox, p. 51, where the writ of See Sigerson, pp. 15, 16 (note). Henry HI. is quoted. s Henry HI. made his son Edward 3 See ante, p. 43. 'lord of Ireland,' and a writ {Rot. ^ See Moore. In the Incorporation Pat. 40 Hen. HI. m. 12) authorised the Charter of Dublin given in 1192, bur- Prince's seal as the great seal of Ireland, gage tenure is established. The first see Constitution of England and Ireland, case of legal action against a tenant by Sir W. Betham, p. 254. M. 4 50 THE COLONY OF THE PALE .- [CHAP. de Burgh, in utter defiance of John's re-grant to Cathal on his surrender of that province which has been alluded to before \ The conflicting titles'"^ to the Irish provinces at this time were of themselves sufficient to stir up war, independent of the national animosities involved ; and murder, massacre, and treachery form the staple of the history of this period. In 1272, a century from the installation of the English power in Ireland, a petition was presented to Edward the First asking for the extension to the Irish of the laws and customs of England. The petitioners were most likely the inhabitants of the districts adjoining the Colony, and the memorial does not seem to have been considered until 1280, or to have led to any important result, but it is a significant proof of the failure of English civilization to extend outside the limits of the Pale I Maddened by oppression and outrage^ the native race sought in 1315 the assistance of Bruce to destroy the English dominion, but upon the failure of his expedition they merely found themselves in worse case than before, and fresh exactions and severities were heaped upon 'the mere Irish.' Slowly but surely, however, the Celtic race had been absorbing to ^ See ante, p. 49. " until the terra rolls, from the portly 2 As late as 1220 the Pope in send- size of from 60 to 90 membranes, for ing letters to Connaught, Ulster and the proceedings of each, are shrunk Munster, addressed the kings of Con- to four." Constitution of England and naught, Cork, Limerick and Ulster. Ireland, p. 350. See Church History of Ireland, S. Ma- ^ How really great were the wrongs lone. of the Irish people is shown by the '^ Attention was called by Sir W. statement of their case forwarded to Betham to the fact that the size of the Pope about this time, by O'Neil, the Placita Kolls of the Courts are an prince of Tyrone, which appears to be indication by which the extent of no exaggerated catalogue of injustice English law and power at different and crime; and by the record cited by times may be judged. During the Sir John Davies {Discoverie, p. 109), reigns of Henry III. and Edward I., 4 Edw. II. where a murderer's defence Edward II. and Edward III. they are reads "bene cognovit quod prsedictum large and well-written, " pleas and as- Johannem interfecit ; dicit tamen quod sizes were held by the justices itinerant per ejus interjectionem feloniam com- in most parts of Ireland, and the plead- mittere non noluit, quia dicet quod ings exhibit an exact sequence and all praedictus Johannes fuit purus Hi- regularity of form and precedent." bernicus." After these reigns they steadily decrease III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 51 itself and incorporating in its being the descendants of the proud Norman settler barons. Severed from England and tied to the land of their adoption, the subtle influence of the soil and the alteration in the blood by admixture of race, had their natural effect. The amalgamation was aided, moreover, by the wild anarchy of the land, for in times when every man's hand was against his brother, an English lord of an Irish fief must have owed all his chances not only of supremacy but of actual existence to the loyalty to his banner of his Irish de- pendents; and while "to the Irish kern it mattered little whether his chief was a Geraldine or an O'Connor; it mattered much whether he was to be ruled under the imported laws of the stranger or by the customs and traditions of his own people.... The baron and his Irish retainers found the rela- tions between them grow easy when the customs of the country were allowed to standi" So, by a strange irony of fate, the very men and means designed for the subjugation of the native system endowed it with a stubborn vitality quite foreign to its natural character. The defection of the English-born subjects of the crown was not tamely countenanced by either the home government or the English Colony, and in 1341 the policy of the English king was specially directed towards breaking the power and wealth of these descendants of the first Anglo-Norman conquerors of Ireland. The first step taken was "a general resumption of all the lands, liberties, seigniories, and jurisdictions that had been granted in Ireland not only by Edward the Third himself but also by his father I" Next followed in 1342 the removal of the Anglo-Irish from offices under the crown ^; and in 1355 came a series of ordinances forbidding intermarriages betwixt English and Irish, and rendering illegal the practice of foster- ing* which was largely carried on. * English in Ireland, Fronde, Vol. i. the administration of justice in Ire- p. 24. land. 2 Moore, Vol. iii. p. 95. 4 xhis practice of fostering was of 3 Close Roll, 15 Edw. III. In the great antiquity, and Dr Whitley reign of Edw. III. also was passed an Stokes, in the Tripartite Life of St " Ordinatio pro statu terrae Hiber- Patrick, Vol. i. p. clxix, says, " The niae," 31 Edw. III. st. 4, to amend relations of fosterer and fosterling seem 4-^2 52 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. Some doubt has been expressed as to the way in which English statutes were made to apply to Ireland. It is cus- tomary to find in the Irish enactments allusions to the English statutes as though without any formality they were as a matter of course part of the law of Ireland : it is most likely that they were introduced by the simple process of sending them over under the great seal, the methods of legislation being at this date arbitrary in the extreme \ Gradually but surely as time went on the power of the Celtic customs made head against the English laws, and the Anglo-Irish rulers became more and more synonymous with the native race. At length in 1367 was passed the memorable Act known as the Statute of Kilkenny, by which a determined effort was made, on the part of those settlers and colonists who were still loyal to the English rule, to stem the tide of Celtic influence^. By this statute it was made treason for one of English birth or blood to accept or rule by the Brehon Law ; and to intermarry, or to permit the fosterage of children^ with the Irish : whilst the penalty of forfeiture was attached to those who adopted the names, tongue, or manners of the mere Irish. The efforts of civilization to reclaim her errant children came, however, too late, and from this time the legislation of the English colony is occupied more in repeated and futile at- tempts at the repression of the alien and degenerate English in Ireland to have been of almost more se governent as Maniers, guise, et lang importance than those of parent and des Irrois enemies, et auxaint ownt fait child;" he mentions that there was divers mariages et aliaunces enter eux frequently a plurality of fosterers, in- et les Irrois enemyes" (quoted by Si- stancing Cormac, the son of Enda, gerson from "Tracts relating to Ire- who had four, and the curious ques- land," Irish Archffiological Society), tion addressed to St Patrick as to This statute was renewed by every whether ' God's son had many foster Parliament until 1452. fathers' (si filium ejus nutrierunt ^ xhe subject of fosterage as dealt multi). with in the Brehon Law will be found 1 See Eeeve's History of the English in the 'Cain larrath,' one of the sub- Law, Vol. II. p. 249, 250. tracts of the Senchus Mor. It presents 2 How strong this influence had a glimpse of the social life of the Irish become is shown by the following ex- worthy of much attention, — for an tract. "Et ore plusors Engleis de la able resume see the introduction to dit terre guepissant la lang, gis, mon- the second volume of the Ancient Laios ture, leys, usages. Engleis vivent et of Ireland. III. FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 53 than in a struggle against the purely native race. When Richard the Second in 1394 came over to Ireland, the force at his command, it is true, for a time brought the lapsed chiefs again to their allegiance, but the revival of English authority was only temporary. The absenteeism of many of the loyal lords prevented any possibility of the retention of power over the Anglo-Irish chieftains, and the prohibition of absenteeism under pain of forfeiture does not appear to have efficaciously grappled with the difficulty. The circle of the English colony grew steadily less, and in the reign of Henry the Fourth there are significant proofs of the decreased power of the Pale and the formidable encroachments upon it by the Irish, in the licenses given to particular colonists to war with " the enemy," In addition there are licenses to trade, and (despite the Statute of Kilkenny) to intermarry and to enter into gossipred and fosterage with the Irish, which are manifestly concessions to the exigencies of circumstances^; a fact further shown by the payment of ' black rent ' by the English authorities to buy off the hostility of neighbouring chieftains. Towards the end of this reign it was admitted in Parliament by the Speaker of the English House of Commons that the greater part of Ireland had been 'conquered' by the natives'^; and the conquests of Henry the Fifth in France prevented a great military genius from employing in the subjugation of what was nominally his own kingdom, the army with which for a time France was ' re- duced to an English province^.' 1 Instances of these licenses are quoted by Moore, Vol. iii. pp. 148, 149:— (1) Tomake war... "Rex, pro eo quod maneria et possessiones Cornelii Epis- copi in Lym. in frontura raarchiarum inter Hibernicos inimicos et Anglicos rebelles sita sunt, concessit ei, tenen- tibus et serventibus suis quod ipsi cum dictis Hibernicis, etc. tractare possent." Pat. Roll 10 Hen. IV. (2) For fosterage... "Rex, pro servicio, licentiam dedit Willielmo filio Henric. Betagh quod ipse Elizam filiam suam cuidam Odoni Oraylly Hibernico dare possit ad nutriendum." Pat. Roll 7 Hen. IV. 2 See Lingard's Hist, of Eng.^ Vol. II. p. 320. 3 A military expedition round the borders of the Pale was indeed carried out with success during this reign by Sir John Talbot, but it was productive of no lasting effect and is mainly no- ticeable from the fact that the ill-paid soldiery levied 'coyne and livery' on the inhabitants of the Colony ; a curi- ous instance of the vitality of the Irish customs. 54 THE COLONY OF THE PALE, [CHAP. IIL The inattention displayed by the conqueror of Agincourt to the needs of Ireland was not caused by any want of energy on the part of the English colony there in proclaiming their grievances. In the Close Roll of 9 Henry V. is a most lengthy petition^ for redress of their wrongs, which amongst other points complains to the king that "his poor lieges are dis- tressed, and his land, for the greater part, wasted and de- stroyed by the Irish enemies and English rebels, as well by their continual wars on his said lieges in each country of his said land, as by divers extortions, oppressions, non-payments and evil coignes by divers lieutenants and by default of due execution of his laws." Henry the Fifth, however, was totally engrossed by continental conquest, and no heed seems to have been paid to the representations from Ireland. On his death the guardians of Henry the Sixth had more im- portant matters to deal with at home, and the result of this neglect was soon apparent. About this time it was stated "yr is not left in the nethir parties of the counties of Dyvelin (Dublin), Mith (Meath), Loueth and Kildare, that yoynin to gadyr, oute of the subjection of the saide enemyes and rebels scarisly xxx miles in lengthe, and xx in brede ther, as a man may surely ride other go, to answerre to the Kynge's writtesl" 1 Quoted in full by Sir W. Betham, sent to Hen. VI. which are in the The Constitution of England and Ire- Close KoU 7 Hen. VI. and 14 Hen. VI. land, pp. 335 — 350. respectively, both are quoted by Be- ^ Sigerson, p. 21 : see also two re- tham, pp. 353—365. presentations of the state of Ireland CHAPTER IV. The Colony of the Pale (From Henry VII. to James I.). When the House of Tudor ascended the English throne a marked change came over the relations of England to Ireland. Following out in succession that bent for the establishment of law and order which was the distinguishing characteristic of these powerful sovereigns, a determined effort was made to reduce to subjection the turbulent country. Henry the Seventh was not firmly enough seated on the English throne to accomplish much, but after the defeat of the Anglo-Irish ex- pedition in favour of Simnel at Stoke he sent Sir Richard Edgecombe in 1488 to exact new oaths of allegiance from the Irish feudatories \ It is curious, therefore, to note that Henry the Seventh seems to have considered that the policy of Henry the Second as to the subjection of Ireland by the agency of feudal lords, was the best plan of introducing order into the country ; whereas in England his efforts were directed to break- ing the power of the barons. After the Warbeck plots the famous Statute of Drogheda termed 'Poyning's Law^' was passed, which restricted the holding of Parliaments in Ireland save when the causes and considerations of Acts intended to be passed had been approved by the English King and Council^ It was to the provision of this law respecting the maintenance of a frontier fortification by the English settlement that the term 'Colony of the Pale' is due. Acts of this date also revive the Statute of Kilkenny*; contain many provisions for 1 Field, p. 248. then sent into Ireland as deputy. 2 Passed at Drogheda in November, ^ iq Henry VII. c. 4 (Irish). 1494, called after Sir Edward Poyning, * lb. c. 8 (Irish). 56 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. the better protection of the Marches^; and deal with the heavy exactions by the lords^ a very necessary step, for " doomed to suffer by the peculiar oppressions of both countries, Ireland was harassed not only by her own ancient exactions, coyne and livery, but also by the English mode of extortion, pur- veyance I" Eventually Henry the Seventh seems to have abandoned his original plan of ruling by means of the Anglo-Irish barons, for, with a view to crushing their power, an Act was passed for the resumption of the greater part of the crown grants made since the time of Edward the Second*. It is important to bear in mind that though when first made laws practically affected merely the Colony of the Pale, yet as the power of the crown extended over Ireland so did the statute law. On the accession of Henry the Eighth a policy, at once more extended in its aims and more vigorous in its execution than had before characterized the English relations with Ire- land, was entered upon. This as first carried out was free from the severity which it afterwards developed^ Still fol- lowing the idea of obtaining subjection by means of crown feudatories Henry strove to resuscitate the system of Anglo- Irish lords, and to assimilate the native Irish Princes to the same model. The desire to vest large estates in the grantees of the crown evidently aimed at the hold which would be thus obtained upon such grantees by the forfeiture to which their estates would become liable in case of treason; and it was doubtless considered that the antagonism of interest created between the feudal grantee and tribal usage would lead to the total overthrow of the popular system I To the ever recurrent overthrow of schemes which the English, to do them justice, considered great reforms, must be ascribed much 1 10 Henry VII. c. 10 (Irish). doned most of the great men who had 2 lb. c. 18 (Irish). been engaged in the Warbeck Plot, 3 Moore, Vol. iii. p. 221. By 10 and the Liberties and Charter of Hen. VII. c. 22 all the statutes made Youghal were restored and confirmed, in England relating to the public weal Cox, p. 192. were made good and effectual also ^ O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Revieic^ as regards Ireland. 1887, p. 138. ^ Cox, p. 189. Henry however par- ^ See Intro. A. L.of I. Vol. iii. IV.] FROM HENRY VIL TO JAMES I. 57 of the bitterness of feeling with which Irish customs were regarded. A report prepared for Henry the Eighth in 1515^ gives a graphic description of the state of Ireland at that time ; after prefacing that " Ther byn more than 60 countryes, called Regyons, in Ireland, inhabytyd with the Kinges Irish enymyes ; some region as bygge as a shyre, some more, some lesse, unto a lytyll ; some as bygge as halffe a shyre and some a lytyll lesse ; where reygneith more than 60 chyef Capytaynes wherof some callyth themselffes Kynges, that lyveyth onely by the swerde, and obeyeth to no other temperall person, but onely to himself that is stronge ; and every of the said Capytaynes makeyth warre and peace for hymself, and holdeith by swerde, and hath imperiall jurysdyction within his rome, and obeyeth to noo other person, Englyshe ne Iryshe, except only to suche persones, as maye subdue hym by the swerde:" it deals at some length with the native Irish and the Anglo-Irish leaders, and says " The names of the Countyes subjett unto the Kinge's lawes Halff the countye of Uryell (Louth) by estimation „ „ Meath Dublyn Kyldare „ „ Wexford. "All the comyn peoplle of the said halff countyes, that obey- eth the Kynge's lawes, for the more parte ben of Iryshe byrthe, of Iryshe habyte and of Iryshe langagel" The report con- tinues that tribute was paid by the English settlement to the wild Iryshe : — "The countye of Uryell payeth yerely to the great Oneyll 40£ Meath „ „ to Ochonour 300£ „ „ Kyldare „ „ to the said Ochonour 20£ ^ State of Ireland and a Plan for its ments in the same volume of the State Reformation, State Papers, Henry VIII. Papers, pp. 338—481 as to the scarcity Vol. II. part iii. pp. 1—30. This report of English. is founded mainly on the ' Salus Po- 2 state Papers, Henry VIII. Vol. 11. pwh'' of Pandarus. Compare also state- pt. iii. p. 8. 58 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. The Kynge's exchequer payeth yerely to M^Murho 80 markes „ Countye of Wexfor „ „ „ „ &toArteOboy 40£\" And it is plain how greatly the means of exaction of both the Irish and the English landed systems were pressed upon the inhabitants of the Pale, for the report says that : — " What with the extortion of coyne and lyverye dayly, and wyth the wrongful exactions of osteing money, and of caryage and cartage dayly, and what with the Kinge's greate subsydye yerely, and with the said trybute and blak rent to the Kynge's Iryshe enymyes, and other infynyt extortions and dayly exactions^," they were even more heavily oppressed than the inhabitants of the Marches. Henry endeavoured to change this state of affairs by the enforcement of English rule, and was to a certain limited extent successfur\ His assumption of the title of King of Ire- land was well received ; and by bribing the leading native chiefs with the spoils of the Church, in the shape of lands formerly belonging to the Irish abbeys*, he induced some of them to surrender their lands and receive them again as feudal tenants. It would seem, however, that the Irish Princes reserved to themselves all their former privileges I Mr Froude observes "Henry did not insist that the Irish, ill-trained as they had been, should submit at once to English law. ... He disavowed all intentions of depriving the chiefs of their lands, or of con- fiscating their rights for the benefit of Englishmen. He desired to persuade them to exchange their system of election for a feudal tenure, to acknowledge by a formal act of sur- render that they held their lordships under the crown... in return they might retain and administer the more tolerable of their own Brehon laws, till a more settled life brought with it a desire for the English common law^" By similar gifts of Church lands Henry won over many of the degenerate 1 State Papers, Henry VHI. VoL ii. by small crown rents is derived from pt. iii. p. 9. these grants. ^ lb. pp. 9, 10. ^ See Spenser's View of the State of 3 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Review^ Ireland, 1633, p. 4. 1887, p. 138. ^ The English in Ireland, Froude, 4 Some of the land in Ireland held Vol. i. pp. 37, 38. IV.] FROM HENRY VII. TO JAMES I. 59 barons', and he also endeavoured to prevent absenteeism, and thus to strengthen the loyal element within the Pale. This policy, if carried out to the full, might at least have largely increased the English power in Ireland, even if it had not ultimately led to the subjection of the whole island^; but the narrow aims of the colonists of the Pale, whose desires appear to have been centred in universal spoliation, and who aimed at nothing but the division of the lands of ' the enemy ' between themselves, opposed a barrier to the more liberal methods of the English king. Before long also the religious animosities^ arising out of the reformation added fuel to the raging furnace of national passions, and brought all the powers of bigotry and intolerance into play in the death struggle of Irish independence. At first the efforts of Henry to introduce the reformation into Ireland did not raise as much opposition as might have been expected from the Irish lords*, though the resistance of the clergy^ rendered the attempt futile. The wars of Elizabeth were in reality inspired by the lust of conquest and the an- tagonism of race rather than by religious fervour; but from the time when the Stuarts ascended the English throne the crusade of religion began in earnest ; and Cromwell and his fanatical soldiery gained those substantial temporal possessions in Ireland (which for the first time justify its being termed a completely conquered country) under the banner of religious bigotry, and in the cause of religious intolerance. 1 Land holding in various countries^ the minds of the vanquished race. Field, p. 250. The new feud of Protestant and Papist 2 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. R. p. 138. inflamed the old feud of Saxon and 3 " The patriotism of the Irish had Celt." Lord Macaulay's Hist, of Eng- taken a peculiar direction. The object land, Vol. i. p. 34. of their animosity was not Rome but ^ But the Geraldines were a conspi- England; and they had especial rea- cuous exception. son to abhor those English sovereigns ^ Cromer, Archbishop of Armagh who had been the head of the great and Primate of Ireland, was a vigorous schism, Henry the Eighth and Eliza- opponent of Henry. This is the same beth. During the vain struggle which Cromer who in 1553 obtained a formal two generations of Milesian princes pardon for having made use of the maintained against the Tudors, reli- Brehon laws. (Pat. and Close Rolls of gious enthusiasm and national enthu- Chancery in Ireland, 24 and 25 Hen. siasm became inseparably blended in VIII.) 60 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. The earlier portion of the reign of Elizabeth was marked by the theoretical confiscation of Ulster, which, however, re- mained practically unsubdued ; by an attempt to levy assess- ments by Royal authority independent of the sanction of Parliament ; and finally by some claims to lands in Cork under alleged charters dating from the time of the old Norman feudal grants \ Plans for colonization also were laid before the English government by those who had no title, but offered to defray the costs of conquest in consideration of grants from the conquered territory'^. The Anglo-Irish lords and Irish chieftains, with no small reason, felt that the seal of doom was upon them, and the brewing trouble took form in the rising at first headed by Sir John Desmond, the treacherous murderer of Henry Davels, and afterwards by the Earl of Desmond. Religious motives strengthened this outbreak, and indeed almost created it ; but although aided by a small expedition of Italian and Spanish volunteers, the futile effort ended in desolation and despair, and so complete was the ravage and wreck in Munster that "the lowing of a cow or the sound of a ploughboy's whistle was not to be heard from Valentia to the rock of CasheP," From the widespread confiscations which followed, a supply of lands was obtained, sufficient, it would seem, to have been a most potent bribe to the new settler class that it was the policy of the English crown to plant on the Irish soil. Half a million acres'* escheated to the crown, and were divided into lots of 12,000, 8,000, 6,000 and 4,000 acres respectively. The rents reserved were practically nil, an estate at fee farm of 12,000 acres being only rented at £33. 6s. 8d. for three years, and then at £66. ISs. 4td. The scheme designed for the plantation was briefly that every 1 Field, pp. 250 and 251. in towns and cities ; nor yet see any 2 This method of raising money from beasts but the very wolves, the foxes, * Undertakers ' afterwards became com- and other ravening beasts." Quoted by mon. Hallam, Const. Hist, of Eng. vol. iii, 3 " Whosoever did travel from one pp. 366, 367. And see John Hooker's end to the other of all Munster, even dedicatory epistle to Girald. Cambr. in from Waterford to Limerick which is Holinshed's Chronicles^ vol. i. about six score miles, he should not •* 574,628 acres, meet any man, woman, or child, saving IV.] FROM HENRY VII. TO JAMES I. 61 seigniory should be inhabited within seven years on the fol- lowing system: — "every undertaker of 12,000 acres was bound to plant eighty-six families : his own family was to have 1,600 acres, one chief farmer 400, two good farmers 600, two other farmers 400, fourteen freeholders (each 300) 4,200, forty copy- holders (each 100) 4,000, twenty-six cottagers and labourers 800. Other undertakers being bound proportionately \" In 1586 an immense quantity of fertile land was practically going begging ; lands were offered at twopence an acre with no rent to be required for the first three years'^ yet the fruitful soil scarce found an owner. By the original design of the plantation the grants of land were to have been conditional on the settlement on the soil by the undertakers of English tenants, but the idea had to be abandoned. The practical failure of the plantation, at any rate, to answer the purpose for which it was designed, i.e. the ousting of the native popu- lation, was mainly due to (1) the extensive grants made to particular individuals^ who themselves remained absentees, making but small and unsuccessful efforts to plant English sub-tenants, and who moreover were not averse to an Irish tenantry (since they paid higher rent than any for which English small holders* could be induced to settle) ; and (2) the short terms for which lands were granted by the English undertakers. The uncertainty of possession and the exactions levied on the tenants prevented any real improvement of the land, and led to its being wastefully impoverished. No buildings worthy of the name were erected, and the wretched slave of the soil lived a life but one degree above that of the animals he tended. Any gathering of wealth brought ruin ; coshered by some wandering ex-chief, or rack-rented by some English undertaker, the small holder presented an em- blem of misery. When dealing with the reorganization of much of the Irish land system which took place during the reign of Elizabeth, the 1 Sigerson, p. 33. * See a passage from Kobert Paine's 2 Field, 251. Briefe Description of Ireland (1589), ^ Sir Walter Raleigh obtained 42,000 quoted p. 35 Sigerson. acres in Cork and Waterford. 62 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. * Composition of Connaught,' planned under a Commission issued in 1585, with the object of inducing the nobles of Connaught to surrender their titles and hold instead by letters patent^ from the crown, should not be passed over. It was one of the first of a succession of legal devices for the change of Irish tenures into feudal ones. Few chieftains, however, agreed to the change, which would have greatly altered the relations of chiefs and people both inter se and towards the land. The principle proposed in the change was that a pay- ment of IO5. for every 120 acres should operate as a discharge from all cess, taxation tallage, charges, bearing of soldiers, &c., and that a rent should be payable for the lands ; while the customs of Gavelkind and Tanistry were to be abolished. In several of the indentures^ also the mean freeholders were placed in direct dependence on the crown, a remarkable fact bearing a strong resemblance to the effect of 'quia emptores,' and establishing something greatly like a peasant proprietary. Though this abortive scheme is not of great importance, for few chieftains surrendered under it (though the surrender was widespread under the commission of James the First), still when the plans of Wentworth with regard to Connaught are remem- bered, an interest is felt in the nature of the titles so un- scrupulously attacked : and in regard to those of the Irishry who had surrendered their estates and received a re-grant, it is hard to find words strong enough to describe the injustice of the pretext on which it was attempted to oust them. In August 1598 the flame of open revolt again broke out, this time in Ulster under Hugh O'Neil (afterwards Earl of Tyrone), and O'Donnell. With the war-cry of religion added to the stored wealth of national hatred^, indued with a fury 1 By 12 Eliz. c. 4 (Irish) a power ^ This enactment is to be found in had been given by which any of the the indentures for Eoscommon, Sligo, Irishry or degenerate EngUsh were Mayo and Leitrim — and Dr Sigerson enabled on surrender to obtain grants suggests it may have had a bearing on of their lands by letter patent from "the after quietness of the western the crown— defects appearing in the provinces," p. 31. letters patent issued under this Act, ^ -jhe dispossession of the Catholic they were remedied by James I. in 1615 clergy by Elizabeth and the substitu- by new surrenders and re-grants. tion of what has been well termed ' a IV.] FROM HENRY VII. TO JAMES I. 63 such as is almost without parallel, the strife raged. Philip of Spain, smarting from the defeat of his designs on England and burning with a lust for revenge, sent aid, and O'Neil was no ordinary leader; but the doom of destruction was on the Celts. Ravage and ruin was spread broadcast through the land, but the result of the struggle was never really in doubt. No sooner was the conduct of the war entrusted to Mountjoy than the fate of the Irish was sealed, and in 1602 all was over. From the horrors of the prolonged war, as from so many another blood-stained page of Irish history, one can but turn with loathing. The revolt is important in its ultimate bearing on the history of the Irish land, though no important forfeitures were immediately exacted. The leaders of the rising were treated with singular mercy as one by one they surrendered, O'Neil himself being left in his Earldom ; but O'Neil and O'Donnell were marked men. Elizabeth again tried the policy, so often unsuccessful, of a leniency which was neither respected nor understood. Four years later, in the reign of James the First, O'Neil and the Earl of TyrconneP, detected in planning another outbreak, fled the country, and their immense estates escheated to the crown. Some two millions of acres — the counties of Donegal, Derry, Cavan, Fermanagh, Armagh and Tyrone — were thus placed at the disposal of the English; but, only 511,465 were actually taken up by the crown. The way in which this half million of acres was primarily granted is shown by the following table ^ : To the Londoners and other undertakers : 209,800 The Bishops' mensal lands 3,413 „ „ termons and erenachs 72,280 „ College of Dublin 9,600 college of shepherds without sheep' would have been tried by the Desmonds let loose upon the people a body of and Tyrones, independent of this ecclesiastics, who, themselves smarting motive. under their injuries, helped to stir i Brother of the O'Donnell of the that spirit of rebellion which was revolt, who died in Spain, simmering throughout the country ; 2 Taken from Short Hist, of Irish but as is remarked by Hallam (vol. People, A. G. Kichey, p. 605. III. p. 365) the chances of insurrection 64- THE COLONY OF THE PALE. [CHAP. IV. For free schools 2,700 To Incumbents for glebes 18,000 The old glebes 1,268 To Deans and Prebends 1,473 „ servitors and natives 116,330 „ impropriations and abbey lands 21,552 The old patentees and forts 38,214 To new corporations 8,887 Restored to Maguire 5,980 Restored to several Irish 1,468 The scheme of plantation drawn up in 1609^ provided for the settlement upon these lands of large numbers of small tenants, and a colony of Scotch and English Protestants, mainly 'labourers, weavers, mechanics, farmers and merchants/ was established on the escheated territory. Frugal and hard- working the new settlers established an era of apparent pros- perity, and until 1641 lived side by side with the native race^ with less open hostility than might have been expected. 1 Fully treated of in the next Chapter. tory, some million and a half acres, 2 To whom the unappropriated terri- had been restored. PAKT II. lEELAND THE SLAVE. M. CHAPTER V. The substitution of English Tenures and the Era of Protestant Ascendency. There is every reason to believe that the changes first systematically introduced in the reign of James the First were conceived in a liberal spirit, and honestly designed to benefit an unhappy country groaning under the yoke of heavy oppres- sions ; but the fatal mistake of implanting a comparatively ad- vanced civilization upon a society unfit to receive it converted what was intended as a benefit into a curse. What would have been the effect of a recognition of the Brehon Law, and an application of the machinery of Courts and determinate sanc- tions to its system is difficult to say, probably it would have forced into unnatural prominence many customs which had only a theoretical existence^; but it is hard in the light of later events not to think that this might have been the less of two evils. The history of the final abolition of the Irish code is simple. Two decisions of the Courts in the reign of James the First, whereby the whole land system of the Brehon Law was crumbled into dust, became of great importance, since they followed the conquests of war, and hence affected practically the whole of Ireland. One, by the decision of all the Judges ('per tons les justices') declared void in law the Irish custom of Gavelkind succession, while the other abolished Tanistry. The judgment in Gavelkind which is fully reported by Sir John Davies is worthy of close examination. The reasons given in it for the decision are : — ^ Sir H. Maine considered that this cognition in India of the Indian cus- has largely been the result of our re- toms. 0—2 68 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. (1) That the frequent partitions and the removals of the tenants from one portion to another caused great uncertainty of possession to be felt, and led to no civil habitations being erected, or enclosures and improvements made (instancing the case of Ulster, "which seemed to be all one wilderness before the new plantation made by the English undertakers there"). (2) That it differed from Kentish Gavelkind^ in that the latter : — i. Only parted the lands between the next heirs male, who took estates of inheritance. ii. Excluded bastards. iii. Endowed the wife with a moiety. iv. Permitted females to take in default of males ; none of which characteristics were present in Irish Gavelkind. (3) That in several ways it resembled the custom of Gavelkind used in North Wales, which was abolished by 34 Hen. VIII. c. 28. The judgment therefore says that " for these reasons and because all the said Irish countries, and the inhabitants of them, from henceforward, were to be governed by the rules of the Common Law of England, it was resolved and declared by all the Judges, that the said Irish custom of Gavelkind was void in law, not only for the inconvenience and unreasonable- ness of it, but because it was a mere personal custom and could not alter the descent of inheritance. And therefore all the lands in these Irish countries were now adjudged to descend according to the course of the Common Law, and that wives should be endowed, and the daughters should be inheritable to these lands notwithstanding this Irish usage or custom I" This judgment was, by the special order of the lord deputy, registered amongst the Acts of Council^. 1 Of which in reality, however, it ^ And this provision was added ** if was but a more primitive form. For a any of the mere Irish had possessed contemporary account of Kentish Ga- and enjoyed any portion of land by velkind see A Treatise of Gavelkind, this Irish custom of Gavelkind before by William Sumner, London, 1660. the reign of James the First, they 2 Hill, 3, Jacobi. Davies' Reports, should be continued and established pp. 134 — 138. in it, but that all such should hence- v.] AND THE ERA OE PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 69 Not less important than this decision is the one by which the custom of Tanistry was declared void. It was given upon a special verdict found in ejectment between Murrough Mac Bryan, plaintiff, and Cahir O'Callaghan, defendant ; the ques- tion being whether the title of the heir at Common Law, which lay in the defendant, or the title of the Tanaist, which was the estate of the plaintiff, should prevail. The case remained in the King's Bench for three or four years, and was argued several times, while the Judges on different occasions delivered their opinions on the various points raised. The suit termi- nated in an agreement by consent for a division ; it was, how- ever, finally settled by the Court that "the said custom of Tanistry was void in itself, and abolished when the Common Law of England was established." By these two decisions the law of a nation, which, whatever its faults, was ingrained in their national life, and regarded by them with that unreasoning devotion which is one of the curious contradictions of the Celtic nature, was swept away. While giving all due credit to the disinterested motives of the English Crown and its advisers, and to the strict impartiality of the judicial decisions, there seems to be no doubt from the lesson of history that a grave error was committed and a sub- stantial injustice done. Despite the recognition by the Brehon Laws of the existence of individual property, a large majority of the land seems to have been ruled by a more or less modified form of the customs of Tanistry and Gavelkind ; and though the extensive growth of the power of the chief makes it evident that in reality the practical development of tenure, and even of primogeniture, was not far distant, still the native Irish were as far from recognizing the fact as were the English rulers who implanted the feudal system upon them. The ignorant Irish tribesman had no notion that the exactions of his chieftain were by imperceptible degrees taking the form of rent, on the contrary he was driven by them to cling more closely to the soil by a hundred ties of attachment ; while the chief more forth be adjudged and descend accord- Plowden's Historical Review of the ing to the Common Law." See also state of Ireland. Furlong's Landlord and Tenant; and 70 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENOLISH TENURES [cHAP. and more regarded the land as a mere source of revenue. Into the hands of the law officials of James the First was in- trusted the impossible task of solving satisfactorily a land problem in which each free member of a tribe who received land in fee would think that he got no more than his due, while those who were neglected, or whose portions not being to their taste must have longed for the old system of redistribution, would imagine themselves forcibly robbed. To these we must also add a certain class of tribesmen, owners of small portions of the tribe-land, who were altogether disregarded by Sir John Davies. The Attorney-General in his letter to the Earl of Salisbury in 1607 when describing the manner in which the land was portioned amongst the septs, and pointing out that almost every acre had a several owner owing to the expansion of the system of distribution by Gavelkind, says, " we made every en- quiry what portion of land or services every man held in every ballibetagh\ beginning with such first as had lands and ser- vices ; and after naming such as had the greatest quantity of land and so descending into such as possess only two taths; then we stayed, for lower we could not go, because we knew the purpose of the State was only to establish such freeholders as are fit to serve on juries I" It is necessary also to bear in mind the position of the next generation of 'mere Irish' to those to whom the grants were made. Thus A, a free member of the sept, receives a grant of lands in fee — he has issue four sons, B, C, D and E. Under the old system each on his birth would have become a member of the sept, he would have looked on all the lands of the sept as in a sense his property, since from them in due course his allotment would have been received. Under the new system B, the eldest, is alone entitled to lands, and these only on his father's death. Assuredly C, D and E 1 The ancient Irish land measures ballybetaghs is well nigh as large as differ so much that it is hard to ex- Monaghan which contains 100. See plain what extent of land is denoted fully on this subject Skene's CeZf. «Scof., by any term. According to Sir John Vol. iii. pp. 153 — 170. Davies, in Fermanagh a ballybetagh is ^ Appended to the early editions of equal to 16 taths, but he then goes on the Discoverie. to say that Fermanagh containing 51 v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 71 (and probably B also) would think that the hated English had robbed them of their birthright. The task of Sir John Da vies was truly no light one, and the way in which he viewed the situation and his manner of dealing with it are worthy of the closest attention. Speaking of Tanistry and Gavelkind he says, "these two Irish customs made all their possessions uncertain, being shuffled, and changed, and removed so often from one to another, by new elections and partitions ; which uncertainty of estates hath bin the true cause of such desolation and barbarism in this land, as the like hath not been seen in any country that professed the name of Christ \" He goes on to state that the Act passed in 12 Eliz.^, enabling the Lord Deputy to take surrenders and re-grant estates to the Irishry, was defective, since (1) few lords made such surrenders, and (2) "they which made surrenders of entire counties obtained grants of the whole againe to them- selves only, and to no other, and all in demesne. In passing of which grants there was no care taken of the inferiour Septes of people, inhabiting and possessing these counties under them, but they held their severall portions in course of Tanistry and Gavelkind, and yielded the same Irish duties or exactions, as they did before ^" Then alluding to the two Commissions which issued under James the First, the one to accept sur- renders and to make re-grants, and the other to strengthen defective titles, he states ; " in the execution of which Com- missions there hath ever bin had a special care, to settle and secure the Under-Tenants, to the end that there might be a repose and establishment of every subject's estate^;" the fol- lowing being the plan adopted ; " when an Irish lord doth offer to surrender his country, his surrender is not immediately accepted, but a commission is first awarded to enquire of these special points. First, of the quantity and limits of the land * Discoveries p. 170. 4 Irish) recites that the Irish had - The instructions given to the Earl petitioned to surrender and authorizes of Suffolk in 1560 by Elizabeth sug- the granting of letters patent. gested that the Irish chiefs should sur- ^ Discoverie, pp. 270, 271. render their estates and take grants in ^ Discoverie, p. 273. tail male ; the Act of 1569 (12 Eliz. c. 72 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP whereof he is the reputed owner. Next how much himself doth hold in demesne, and how much is possessed by his tenants and followers. And thirdly, what customs, duties and services he doth yearly receive out of those lands. This in- quisition being made and returned, the lands which are found to bee the lord's proper possessions in demesne, are drawn into a Particular ; and his Irish duties ; as cosherings, cessings, Rents of Butter and Oatmeale and the like ; are reasonably valued and reduced into certaine summes of Money to be paide yearely in lieu thereof This being done, the surrender is accepted ; and thereupon a grant passed, not of the whole country, as was used in former times, but of those lands only, which are found in the lord's possession, and of those certaine summes of money, as rents issuing out of the rest. But the lands which are found to be possessed by the tenants, are left unto them, respectively charged with these certain rents only, in lieu of all uncertain Irish exactions. In like manner upon all Grants which have passed by virtue of the Commission, for defective titles, the Commissioners have taken special caution, for the preservation of the estates of all particular tenants." Sir John Davies had, it is evident, clearly grasped the fact of the proprietary rights of the members of the tribe in the tribe-land ; but the sweeping nature of the change introduced, and the conflicting character of the rights involved, rendered his settlement an unstable one. Even if the inferior members of the sept were, as stated by him, satisfied and encouraged by the settlement and security of their tenure, the chief was grievously wounded by the restriction of what he considered his inalienable rights^; and subsequent events almost obliterated the class of freehold owners which Sir John Davies had laboured to create. The mode, however, in which the Irish tribesmen were considered in relation to the land is plain, and the system adopted amounts to an acknowledgment of the claims of the tribal freeman to an estate in the land. The injury inflicted iTpon the Irish peasantry lay indeed not so much in the 1 See " The Historical Claims of January, 1881, p. 27, Seebohm. Tenant-Kiglit," Nineteenth Century, v.] AND THE ERA OP PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. '73 introduction of the English tenures, as in the after refusal to recognize the rights of the tenantry established under the compulsory reorganizations of the land system. In the Com- mission for making shires in 1605 the principle of the ex- istence of tenant-right was also recognized: for the conduct of many persons who, pretending to be lords, had expelled ancient tenants or imposed exactions upon them "under pre- tence that the said tenantes or freeholders are but tenantes- at-will, albeit they and their ancestors have enjoyed the same by course of descent for many hundred yeares past," is repro- bated \ In 1608, on the flight abroad of the two Earls^ their estates were, as has been described in the last chapter, forfeited to the Crown. It will be necessary to go at some length into the nature and regulations of the colony which was planted on the most fertile portion of this territory, and it will be seen that at first sight the plan devised was not inequitable. Still it must be remembered that in many ways this plantation was a deliberate undoing of the work of Sir John Davies. The rights of the newly created freeholders obtained little recognition, and were frequently infringed on behalf of the settlers, and even where their rights were not actually dis- turbed a feeling of insecurity was given to the new tenures, the one thing it was most important to avoid. It is perhaps worthy of note that it has been alleged that the disgavelling which preceded the forfeitures Was part of a deep plot of the English, who considered, on the analogy of the Gavelkind lands in Kent, that Irish Gavelkind lands would be more protected against escheat than those held by knight-service. The faults of the suggestion are obvious. It is true that the very nature of the Brehon Law is far too archaic to recognize such forms of ownership as the principle of escheat involves, but the theory of Gavelkind had never before been allowed to interfere with the rights of the Crown in Ireland to escheats, and both Earls held from the Crown long before the 'Case of Gavel- kind.' The suggestion is a very fair example of the amount of 1 Sigerson, Hist, of Land Tenure ^j ggg ante, p. 63. and Land Glasses, p. 104 (note.) 74 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. ingenious perversion which is always applied to the acts of the English in Ireland. The plantation of the colony in Ulster was evidently ela- borated with no small care by James the First and his ad- visers \ who adopted in the main a project drawn up by the Privy Council of Ireland ^ Orders and Conditions^ were issued for the guidance of the undertakers who applied for grants of land, commencing as follows: — "His Majesty in his princely bounty, not respecting his own profit, but the public peace and welfare of the kingdom, is graciously pleased to distribute the said lands to such of his subjects, as well of Great Britain as of Ireland, as being of merit and ability shall seek the same with a mind not only to benefit themselves, but to do service to the Crown and common wealth," The most noticeable points of the proposed scheme of plantation were that the lands to be distributed were divided into lots of 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 English acres respectively, and the undertakers to whom such lots were committed were separated into three classes, namely : (1) " English or Scottish, as well servitors'' as others, who are to plant their portions with English, or inland Scottish inhabitants." (2) " Servitors in the kingdom of Ireland, who may take mere Irish, English or inland Scottish tenants at their choice." (3) " Natives of Ireland who are to be made freeholders ^" The rents of the English and Scottish undertakers were fixed at £5. 6s. Od. for every 1,000 acres, and no charge of rent was to be made for the first two years. The nature of their tenure was as follows. Every grantee of 2,000 acres was to hold by knight's service in capite ; and every grantee of 1,000 acres was to hold in common socage, no wardships being ex- acted upon the first descent of that land. The undertakers and their tenants were to erect within two years castles and 1 Though the plantation was pro- project is quoted in full, pp. 105 — 120. j acted by the king and by Bacon it was 3 gee Harris' Hibernica, p. 123 et chiefly carried into effect by Sir Arthur seq. Chichester, who appears to have dis- ^ The servitors were of two kinds, played great resources, and who received (1) great officers of the state, (2) rich a large allotment himself. adventurers from England. 2. See Harris' Hibemica, where this ^ Harris' Hibernica, p. 114. v.] AND THE ERA OP PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 75 buildings ; they were forbidden to alienate their holdings to the ' mere Irish/ and were not allowed to create tenancies at will. The undertakers were bound within two years to place upon their lands a competent number of tenants and the rent was to be a fixed sum; special proviso being made against cuttings, cosherings, and other Irish exactions \ The above rules appear to be framed in a liberal and thoughtful spirit, and show much consideration for the best interests of the land. The rules applicable to the Irish natives who were admitted as freeholders also seem to be both mag- nanimous and well considered. They are mainly as follows : — their estates to be in fee farm, the yearly rent being £10. 13s. 4<d. for each portion of 1,000 acres, and no rent to be payable for the first year; their tenures to be similar to those of the other undertakers with a proviso of forfeiture on rebellion. They were to inhabit their lands and to build castles and houses ; but no Irish exactions were to be taken ^. As regards the class of native small-holders in Ulster, it would seem that these rules might have afforded a satisfactory posi- tion, but unfortunately the plantation was not ultimately carried out quite as designed. The native Irish were fre- quently unjustly ousted to make way for new English settlers, and the engine of English law, the theory and methods of which were completely strange to the native race, was only too often used to establish claims of the Crown in the native holdings. In other parts of Ireland this was even more the case than in Ulster, " in King's and Queen's Counties, and in those of Leitrim, Longford and Westmeath, 385,000 acres were ad- judged to the Crown, and 66,000 in that of Wicklow," so that, though much was re-granted to the Irish, it shook their sense of possession^; while the flagrant injustice with which the claims of the Crown were often prosecuted, rankled in their minds. Meanwhile the energetic class of artizans and me- ^ See Orders and Conditions for the while the beneficed clergy were cared planters of Ulster given in Harris' for by more provision being made for Hibernica, from a copy printed in 1608. them. And see ante, pp. 63, 64. 2 Harris' Hibernica, p. 129. The ^ Hallam's Constitutional History, lands which had been lost to the Church Vol. iii. ch. 18, p. 377. during the late troubles were restored, 76 THE StTBSTITtJTlON OF ENGLISH TENUKES [cHAP. chanics of the English settlement throve and prospered a- mazingly, and the sun of prosperity seemed at last breaking through the heavy pall of misgovernment and misery which had enveloped Ireland's history. The forfeitures from which the grants had been derived, however, had cast without sup- port upon the land a body of improvident, vicious and dan- gerous men, the descendants of the former chiefs; and the weapon of religious strife lay ready to their hands. As early as 1611 there were not wanting signs of brewing trouble to be detected by the far-seeing \ On the surface all went well. The Act 13 Jac. I. c. 5^ re- peals many of the statutes in which the Irish are treated as the common enemy, and extends to all the king's subjects the same laws ; while the language of the statute reads in striking contrast to that of earlier legislation — "Whereas in former times... the natives of this realm of Irish blood... were for the most part in continual hostility with the English, and with those who did descend of the English, and therefore the said Irish were held and accounted and in divers statutes and records were termed and called Irish enemies. Forasmuch as the cause of the said difference and of the making of the said laws and statutes doth now cease, in that all the natives and inhabitants of this kingdom, without difference or distinction are taken into his majesty's protection, and do now live under one law, by means whereof a perfect agreement is or ought to be settled betwixt all of his majesty's subjects in this realm. And forasmuch as there is no better means to settle peace and tranquillity in this kingdom, being now inhabited with many worthy persons born in his majesty's several kingdoms, than by abolishing the said laws and giving them free liberty to commerce and match together, so that they may grow into one nation, and there be so utter oblivion and extinguishment of all former differences and discords between them; be it enacted ...that all the said laws be for ever utterly repealedl" The Ulster settlement in the course of years accumulated certain customary modes of dealing with the tenant's interest in 1 See the report of Sir George Carew. ^ gee Froude, Eng. in Ireland, p. 70. 2 (Irish). v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 77 the land. At the present time these exist in the much discuss- ed "Ulster custom'." Its origin is uncertain, but it has plainly- been built up partially on rude notions of equity, and partially on a blending of the Irish notions with those of the settlers. The customs as to land tenure of the Scotch and Welsh tenants planted in Ulster must have been in many ways similar to those of their Irish neighbours, and it is possible that the Irish notions were gradually assimilated to a theory of land tenancy strongly resembling copyhold. Unfortunately the Calvinistic Protestantism of the settlement did something towards adding to the discordant nature of the social system and the animosity of the dispossessed owners of the soil. The Catholics daily gained strength by union in misfortune, and became more and more impatient of the existence of the alien plantation. No excuse, however, for the terrible flood of butchery, cruelty and massacre which the inhuman insurrection of 1641 produced is possible. To the end of time there will rest on the shield of Ireland's honour the bloodstain of this debauch of ruthless slaughter. The real cause of the outbreak is rather to be found in the land troubles ^ than in religious differences. The scheme of a plantation in Connaught had been advancing with gigantic strides^ The Commission on defective titles had extended its fatal grasp all over the country; nor did the patents granted under James the First's Commission prove much protection*, despite that large sums had often been paid as composition to remedy defects. The despicable discoverers laboured hard, and titles were infamously impeached. Four- fifths of Connaught were proved in strict construction to belong to the Crown ^ and the methods of Wentworth, now Earl of Strafford, produced a frenzy of rage, the aid not merely of 1 See post, pp. 117—123. of the mere legal formality of the en- 2 Among the complaints of the lead- rolment of grants made in the time^of ers of the Rebellion is found a protest Elizabeth and James I.) it is hard to against "The avoidance of grants of conceive. lands and liberties by quirks and quid- ^ j^/jg Cromwellian Settlement, Pren- dities of the law," Sigerson, p. 74. dergast, p. 47. 3 A plan of plunder more disgraceful ^ y/jg j^^g i^ Ireland, Froude, p. 80. (founded as it was upon the omissioij 78 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. chicane but even of torture^ being called in to assist the general spoliation. The Connaught Commission paid no heed to the agreement which in 1634 had been made with Charles the First that only sixty years' title need be shown''. Deeds and papers had perished in the many wars of those disturbed times, and the Celt, loving the land as only a Celt can, saw it about to be torn from him wholesale. On the 23rd of October, 1641, the massacre commenced, and the lowest estimate of those who perished is 37,000, while Mr Froude believes that before the insurrection was suppressed more than half a million^ had succumbed. However varied the causes which led to the insurrection, to the England of the Puritans it bore but one aspect, and Crom- well when he landed in 1649 came as the champion of the Protestant cause, to revenge with fire and sword the evil deeds of the ' Popish fiends.' How complete his conquest was is a matter of history, and a grim picture is drawn by the state- ment that so was the co-untry wasted that even the victorious English army well nigh starved. The bearing of Cromwell's conquest, and the subsequent confiscation of more than a third of the land of Ireland, on the history of the land law was immense. High and low, Irish chieftain and Irish peasant, together with the descendants of many of the English settlers of the various earlier settlements, were proscribed on the ground of their religion, their estates passing into the hands of the Puritan soldiery. The half depopulated country, thousands of the inhabitants of which were shipped to the West Indies or driven to take refuge on the Continent, was colonized by Saxons of Calvinistic faith ; yet under the ' iron rule ' there was prosperity, buildings and plantations were made, and the value and rent of land increased daily. The principle of the Crom- wellian Settlement was the foundation of a Protestant military colony, extending over all the most fruitful portion of the land. The native Irish were to be banished to Connaught, which 1 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Review, ^ See Field, p. 253 (note). 1887, p. 139. And see the case of the ^ Following Sir William Petty, see Byrnes of Wicklow. Carte's Life of Froude, Eng. in Ireland, Vol. i. p. 125. Ormonde, bk. 1, p. 74. v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 79 Cromwell determined to make a second Wales, only two classes of persons being exempted from transplantation, (1) those who could prove 'constant good affection,' and (2) the mere earth-tillers, viz. 'all husbandmen, plowmen, labourers, arti- ficers and others of the inferior sort.' The settlement, how- ever, when established differed in many ways from the military landlordism which had been intended. Land bonds had been issued to the adventurers in 1642, and money had been advanced on the security of nearly a million acres. Again in 1653, in order to meet the arrears of pay due to Cromwell's army and sums still due to the adventurers, a most thorough act of confiscation had been passed. The debenture bonds payable in land which had been issued to defray military ex- penses passed into various hands ; and the similar bonds issued to Cromwell's own soldiers^ had in many cases been disposed of by them ; still the country largely passed into the hands of the men who had conquered it. A study of Dr Petty's^ History of the Down Survey^ conveys a clear notion of the great practical difficulties of the working out in detail, within reasonable time and with any approach to justice, of the allotments of forfeited land. " It is difficult to imagine a work more full of perplexity and uncertainty than to locate 32,000 officers, soldiers and fol- lowers, with adventurers, settlers and creditors of every kind and class, having different and uncertain claims on lands of different and uncertain value in detached parcels scattered over two-thirds of the surface of Ireland*." The two races of English and Irish had long been gradually taking the respective positions of landlord and tenant. The forfeitures at this time spread this relation over nine-tenths 1 The form of these debenture bonds signs out of the rebels' houses, tene- is illustrated by a facsimile given in ments and hereditaments in Ireland Mr Prendergast's Gromwellian Settle- or other land, houses, tenements and merit, which runs as follows : hereditaments there in the dispose of "Upon composition and agreement the Commonwealth of England. Sign- made with... for... arrears for service in ed and sealed at Dublin the — day of — Ireland from.... There remains due 1658." from the Commonwealth to the said... 2 Afterwards Sir William Petty, executors, administrators or assigns the ^ 1655 — 6. Published in 1851 by sum of... which is to be satisfied to the the Dublin Archaeological Society, said.., executors, administrators or as- * Notes to History of Survey, p. 338. 80 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. of the country \ The most important point in the Cromwellian Settlement having regard to its future bearing on the land question is the position of those Irish peasantry who were not transplanted with the swordsmen into Connaught. The earth- tillers were kept in their holdings for several reasons ; firstly, they had always been a fairly quiet and toilsome class, and when freed from the influence of the disquieting element of the transplanted fighting men might be expected to develop into a peaceful tenantry ; secondly, there was no sufiicient supply of English to take the lowest positions in the social scale. It has been seen that under the change of tenures effected by Sir John Davies a large proportion of the native Irish became freehold owners. By the confiscations following Cromwell's conquest nearly all trace of the Irish owners was swept away, and the position in law of the tenants was com- pletely altered. No longer considered freeholders subject to a quit rent, they were in future treated merely as " commercial tenants under contract or if without contracts as mere tenants at wilP." There is, however, a very important fact to be con- sidered, namely, that there is no doubt, despite the apparently precarious nature of the tenant's position, that he was at that time considered to have a vested interest in the land. There exists indeed a formal recognition of some degree of tenant- right, for Sir W. Petty when ofiicially surveying the country in the interests of the new owners excepted from his gross valuation of the confiscated lands the value of the tenant's interest in their holdings'^, stating that the benefit of leases and the value of the tenant's improvements upon the said land is one-third — £216,000*. This appears to prove conclusively that he did not consider them mere tenants at will. When Charles the Second was restored, and sober England lapsed for one solitary portion of her history into high carnival, 1 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Review, Political Anatomy of Ireland. Also 1887, p. 141. The History of the Doion Survey, 2 Seebohm, " The Historical Claims 1655—6, published in 1851 by the of Tena.nt-'Right,^' Nineteenth Century , Dublin Archaeological Society. 1881. 4 This valuation included the value 2 Seebohm, " The Hist. Claims of of their cabins. Tenant-Eight," and Sir W. Petty's v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 81 the hearts of the conquered party in Ireland were beating high with hope. Royalists who had ventured and lost all, clamoured for a guerdon from Irish lands ; the transplanted landholders saw themselves again in fancy installed in their homes ; and the holders under the Cromwellian Settlement trembled for their possessions. The final arrangement came as a terrible blow to many. There were difficulties of no small degree in the way of the advisers of Charles, for his father had ratified the Act under which money, on the security of Irish land, was advanced by the adventurers in 1642, and this the king was therefore bound to support. In 1660 the Commission appointed to consider the Irish claims commenced its sittings. It was decided that those who were able to prove themselves innocent of complicity with the original outbreak were to be reinstated in their lands, those in possession being compensated by other grants — the lands still unallotted under the Act of 1653 and the new forfeitures from the old opponents of Charles the First being available for this purpose. The Act of Settlement 14 & 15 Car. II. c. 2, carried out this policy, and a Court of Claims tried the cases in detail \ To a very large extent the Cromwellian settlers managed to retain possession of their lands, yet more settlers were ousted than there was land else- where to satisfy, and a second Act became necessary. This Act, 17 & 18 Car. II. c. 2 (1665), compelled the soldiers, adventurers, and debenture holders to be content with two-thirds of the land they had been entitled to under the Cromwellian settle- ment, and barred all hope of restitution to the 3,000 Irish who had not yet been adjudged innocent. In the vast majority of cases these latter had certainly been guilty, but they were naturally enraged at the loss of their possessions without a trial. The result of the Commission may be stated to be that while before the rebellion the Irish Catholics held some two- thirds of the kingdom, more than half of these possessions were now lostl 1 It seems that nearly 7,800,000 acres 2 Hallam, Vol. iii. chap, 18, p. 33. came before the Court of Claims. — Si- A considerable portion of land in Ire- gerson, p. 96. See Letters of the Earl land is held by small quit rents under of Essex as to the competition for letters patent which date from the Acts lands. of Settlement and Explanation. M. 6 82 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENUKES [CHAP. In reviewing the history of landed relations in Ireland up to the reign of Charles the Second it must be remembered that if heavy burdens had been exacted from the inferior class of holders, the higher class were themselves the victims of no ordinary oppression. The onerous nature of the incidents of the feudal system pressed most heavily on the whole of the Irish colony; repeatedly the complaint is made that heavy as were the exactions levied by the irregular charges of coygne and livery, they were less grievous than the exactions of the king's officers. It is perhaps no wonder that the lords were little less averse than their tenants to practically free themselves from the feudal bond. The overthrow of the feudal incidents \ and the substitution of socage tenures for knight service, which the necessities of his situation enabled the lords to exact from Charles the Second, was undoubtedly the downfall of a system of flagrant evil. Had the improved position of the landlord class led to their extending a merciful forbearance to the peasant earth- tillers, half the accumulated wrongs of the history of the Irish land law might never have arisen. The prevalent custom, however, of looking to Irish land as a source of revenue merely, divorced from all reciprocal duties of just management — which led to the creation of the pestilent class of middlemen, and to a system under which the lands of an absentee owner''^ were let six deep — prevented any amelio- ration of the position of the peasant occupier. With the accession of James the Second rose the cause of the Catholic party in Ireland. James was fully aware that the Irish troubles sprang more from the distinctions of race than from differences of creed ^ and had his proceedings been marked by a determination quietly to enforce the existing state of affairs, rather than by efforts in the interests of one cla^s to overthrow a settlement sanctioned by twenty-five years' possession under the solemn guarantee of Parliament, much 1 The Court of Wards and Liveries 2 "Three-fourths of the land at one was in effect discontinued after 1645, time, always more than half, belonged and formallyabolished by 12 Charles II. to the absentees." Field, p. 263. c. 24, and 14 & 15 Car. II. sess. 4, ^ SeeliOrdM&c&ulay's Hist, of Eng- c. 19 (Irish). land, Vol. i. p. 393. v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 83 bloodshed might have been avoided. Had he at the same time striven to ameliorate the position of the native small holders by extending to them some measure ot certainty of tenure ; and Avhile extinguishing the extravagant hopes of resumption cherished by the old proprietors of large domains endeavoured to reconcile them with the existing settlement, it is possible that no great difficulties might ever again have arisen ; for the con- dition of the colony was now comparatively prosperous, as was clearly shown by the fact that rents had almost doubled ^ His action, however, was widely different. Tyrconnell laboured to undo the work of the Acts of Settlement, and to extirpate the Protestant interest. At the time when William landed in England, in the Court of the Exchequer at Dublin crowded with Irish applicants armed with writs of ejectment and tres- pass, no Protestant title, however established, seemed safe. Finally in 1688 the Catholic party, under the cloak of the cause of the exiled James, again took arms, James landed in 1689, and the Irish and Catholics regarded him as the one who was to restore to them their inheritance. A Parliament met at Dublin ; the Acts of Settlement were repealed ; and the old owners, who had been ousted from land which was barren of all save the good gifts of nature, were replaced on land which the industry, the labour and the capital of others had made fruitful exceedingly.' Attainders overwhelmed the Protestant owners ; but the cause of James was but a house of cards. After the battle of the Boyne the revival of the Protestant supremacy was but a matter of time, and in 1691 the Treaty of Limerick was signed, which proved but a feeble protection to the native race. Again the tide of change rolled over the Irish lands, and the Com- missioners appointed for the purpose of restoring the property of the Protestants entered on their difficult task; but so com- plicated were the rights involved that the Settlement took some years. The large confiscations of the estates of king James and his adherents offered new sources for grants '"^j which ^ See Lord Macaulay's Hist. ofEng- given by Wakefield as amounting to land, Vol. i. p. 393. "1,060,792 acres, which being worth 2 The forfeitures of land belonging £211,623 a year at 6 years' purchase to the adherents of James II. are for a life and 13 years for an inherit- 6—2 84 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. it is to be regretted were often given to those who possessed no claim to them save Royal favour \ and who were far from being the most fitted to deal with the involved problem of Irish land rights I That the bitterness of many unhealed wounds lay between the class who ruled and the class who tilled the land, was calcu- lated naturally to produce oppression on the one hand and hatred on the other. This was increased by the fact that among the class of earth-tillers, reduced to the lowest step of the social ladder, were not merely the descendants of the old tribal freeman, but also the descendants of the noblest houses of the chieftains; men who to the hatred of nation for nation, and creed for creed, added the bitterness always felt by the superior reduced to bondage to one whom he considers immeasurably his inferior. The sympathies of the subject people were all against the dominant class. Freebooters, the relics of the army of James the Second, lived by rapine and exaction ; yet says the Statute of William the Third ^ "the Popish inhabitants chose rather to suffer strangers to be robbed and despoiled of their goods than to apprehend the offenders, the greater part of whom were people of the same country and harboured by the inhabitants." With a short-sighted policy, moreover, the evil effects of which were manifold, the English nation kept the Irish native race enthralled to the soil. The doors which might have been opened to them by the encouragement of manufac- ture and trade were kept resolutely closed. Had this been different, by teaching the Irish to look away from the vexed subject of the land for their sustenance, the strained relations ance amounted to £2,685,130. Out of these estates were afterwards reclaimed these lands the estates restored to the and vested in trustees for sale for the old proprietors under the articles of benefit of the English nation. Limerick and Galway were valued at ^ The Commission of 1699 revealed £724,923 and those restored by Eoyal a mass of jobbery into which it is im- favour at £260,863. And after these possible to enter here, but the case of deductions and several other allow- Lady Orkney alone is suflBcient to ances, the gross value of the estates condemn the whole transaction. See forfeited from the 13th of February, Froude, Eng. in Ireland, Vol. i. pp. 245 1688, amounted to £1,699,343." Ac- —248. count of Ireland. ^ 7 Will. III. c. 21 (Irish), and see 1 By the Resumption Act of 1699 Froude, Vol. i. p. 262. v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 85 between the two classes of landholders might have been eased, and the two races drawn together by bonds of mutual interest in commercial dealings. On the contrary, fresh restrictions were ever and anon placed on the development of native industry. The prohibitions and duties imposed on the export and manufacture of wool and woollen goods \ and then on linen; the restrictions on the importation into England of cattle, and the far-reaching wrong inflicted by the Merchant Navigation Act, 1663^ aggravated the evils of the land system by in- creasing the class of those dependent upon the soil. Moreover, the provisions which prohibited Papists from sitting in Parlia- ment^, and which took away from them the elective franchise, prevented the position of the conquered people being ably advocated, and hindered the bitter cry of their wrongs from adequate utterance. It is, alas, but seldom realized how immense an influence the laws regulating the social relations and commercial dealings of a community have upon the ameli- oration or aggravation of its land system. Where the problem of a community is presented by the abject condition of its lowest class, and that class is found to cling to the land with an unreasoning tenacity which ends only with life itself, it may be predicted with certainty that there exists, either at that time or in the history of the community, some cause other than mere national aspirations. Land, by the fatal policy of Eng- land*, was made the vital necessity of the Celtic race. Half the land hunger of the Irish peasantry has its root in the trans- mitted idea that the possession of land is an essential of exist- ence. The legislation which for a century deliberately shut the door to the growth of Irish commerce, and which systema- tically laboured to reduce to subjection the native race, bound them to the land by barring all other means not only of wealth but of bare subsistence. It will be seen later how this fact 1 13 & 14 Car. II. c. 18, and 10 & 11 have exterminated the Catholics by the Will. III. c. 10. sword, or expell-^d them like the Moris- 2 See Field, p. 266. coes of Spain, would have been little ^ 3 Will. & Mary, c. 2. more repugnant to justice and human- * Hallam says, when dealing with ity, but incomparably more politic." the Penal and Commercial Codes, "To 86 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. rendered the pretty paper theory of free contractual relations in land dealing a source of desperate misery. How was it possible for such a method to hold for a moment when a commodity of which the supply was limited was hungered after by a whole community with a wild desire, caused not only by national predilections and present necessities, but also by an ingrained sentiment, graven upon their characters by a mass of legislation ' which had driven them to the soil for their very being ? Not only the Commercial Codes but also the illiberal and inhumane Penal Code tended to aggravation of the land diffi- culty. Designed as it was to reduce to the lowest grade the scanty remnant of those Catholics who retained recognizable proprietary rights in the soil, its result was to increase the class of those dependent upon the land for their sustenance. A cur- sory glance at some of these provisions, which constitute such a blot on the Statute Book, will illustrate this proposition. Catholics were prohibited from taking a freehold or a mortgage of lands, and if they succeeded to such must conform within six months or forfeit^ to the next Protestant heir. Their lands were gavelled^ and descended to the children equally, but sub- ject to the proviso that if the eldest son conformed, the father merely had an estate for life, the reversion in fee resting with the son^ A Protestant heiress who married a Catholic for- feited her lands to her next of kin, and a Protestant man marrying a Papist became himself liable to all the disa- bilities of a Catholic \ The whole weight of the law tended to reduce the Catholic interest in the land to mere tenancies at will. Leases save for thirty-one years or less, and then at a rent of two-thirds value, were forbidden them; while should the profit rent of the land be found to exceed the allowed third the benefit of the lease was transferred to the Protestant who 1 See O'Connor Morris, p. 143. applied, proving that it was really con- 2 It has been well pointed out that sidered a destructive custom. this provision is a strong confirmation =* What kind of landlord was a son of the good intention with which the who abjured his faith for this reason abolition of Irish Gavelkind was car- likely to be? ried out by Sir John Davies, for here ^ 9 Will. III. c. 3 (Irish), and see for it is restored for the express purpose further repressive legislation 2 Anue of destroying the class to whom it was c. 3 (Irish) and 2 Anne c. 6 (Irish). v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 87 made the discovery. This last provision encouraged a most baneful system of informers, and completely prevented the proper cultivation of the soil. The enactments of Parliament, moreover, were imitated in various bye-laws passed by local corporations, with the result of excluding the Catholics from every useful branch of trade. It is not remarkable that, labouring under the monstrous burden of the Penal and Commercial Codes, the Catholic owners and the native race generally were reduced to a most abject condition, and lapsed into mere occupiers, holding prac- tically only tenancies at will. Nor were the native Irish and the Catholics the only persons who were thus cast on the land. The descendants of many of the Colonists of the Cromwellian Settlement became as Irish as the natives, and were involved with them in the common ruin; while the de- scendants of many colonists of earlier settlements were reduced to the same condition in a rather curious manner. The English undertakers who received estates in the various settlements on the condition of planting a certain number of English tenants had frequently treated those colonists, whom they induced by promises of freehold estates to go to Ireland, with great in- justice. The actual lease for life or lives, or grant of an estate in fee, was refused them, and they were compelled to put up with mere possession and a parol agreement. This frequently satisfied them, since when livery of seisin was at its height possession bore many binding traits \ and the idea that it involved determinate rights was long-lived; but by a statute of William the Third ^ any estate that they might have deemed themselves the owners of was swept away. This statute enacted that after 1696 "all leases, estates, interests, freeholds or terms of years, or any uncertain interest of, into or out of any messuages, manors, lands, tenements or here- ditaments, made and created by livery of seisin only, or by 1 In Bracton's time the law protected Seisin," F. W. Maitland, L. Q. Review ^ possession, even if untitled and vicious, 1888. against property; but by the time of - 7 Will. 3, sess. 1. c. 12 (Irish) and Littleton the power of seisin was great- see Sigerson, p. 101. ly diminished. "The Beatitude of 88 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES. [CHAP. V. parol and not put in writing and signed by the parties so making and creating the same or their agents, thereunto au- thorized by writing, shall have the force and effect of leases and estates at will only." Practically this is an extension of the Statute of Frauds^ to Ireland, and mischievous as that statute has sometimes proved in England, it would in the very nature of things prove more so in Ireland, for an unlearned tenantry would be totally unable to understand such a departure from their parol customs. It has been remarked with much justice that this statute "produced written leases in England, but it only legalized gross general exactions in Ireland." How complete was the subjection of the native race during the hundred years that followed 1691 it is hard to paint in sufficiently forcible colours: Swift, writing in 1731, said, " The estates of the Papists are very few, crumbling into small parcels, and daily diminishing ; their common people are sunk in poverty, ignorance and cowardice, and of as little con- sequence as women and children. Their nobility and gentry are at least one half ruined, banished or converted. They all soundly feel the smart of what they suffered in the last Irish war. Some of them are already retired into foreign countries : others, as I am told, intend to follow them; and the rest, I believe to a man, who still possess any lands, are absolutely resolved never to hazard them again for the sake of esta- blishing their superstition I" As is pointed out by Lord Macaulay, the native race found no champion even among those English who most studiously upheld in England the cause of liberty. "During the century which followed the Eevolution, the inclination of an English Protestant to trample on the Irishry was generally proportioned to the zeal which he professed for political liberty in the abstract. If he uttered any expression of compassion for the majority oppressed by the minority, he might be safely set down as a bigoted Tory and a High Churchman^". ^ 29 Car. II. c. 3. An exception was ary interest, made in the Statute, of leases under 3 2 Dean Swift, The Presbyterian'' s years with a rent of two-thirds value, Plea of Merit, quoted by Macaulay, and assignments were ordered to be in Vol. ir. p. 295, note, writing unless of copyhold or custom- ^ lb. p. 296. CHAPTER VI. The Land and the People. It has been seen that the undoubted rights in the soil possessed by the free tribesman were recognised by Sir John Davies, but these rights had been completely swept away by the various revolutionary settlements and re-settlements of the land. That in a certain sense the English were justified after the time of Cromwell in looking upon Ireland as conquered territory, in which the possessory rights of the natives had been forfeited completely by their repeated risings against the English power, is undoubtedly true. Even the most ardent partisans of the cause of historical tenant-right admit the force of the legal objections to its existence ; but they take another ground and say that the storm of war raged over the heads of an unmoved peasantry, who, when the storm has rolled by, are found still in their place unmindful of the change of ruler, and riveted to the land. There appears no reason whatever to believe this view to be correct. Those who know the Celtic character can understand how, in the war of race against race, the lowest earth-tiller would have felt stirred to rise against the national enemy. The statements of Sir William Petty in his Political Anatomy of Ireland, it is true, seem to show the existence of the earth-tillers after the Cromwellian conquest much as before ; but this proves nothing. The battle over, the cause lost, the earth-tiller returned to his holding because it was the only place he had to go to, and because no state to which the victorious enemy could reduce him could be more terrible than his natural condition. It presupposes no great amount of sagacity to imagine him capable of understanding that, what- 90 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CHAP. ever ruin might overtake the leaders of the lost cause, the * hewers of wood and drawers of water ' were too necessary a part of the social system for the conqueror, who needed their services, to drive them from the land. The survey of Sir William Petty recognised and thus in a sense legalised the possessory rights of the earth-tillers, and to as great an extent as this was done they could claim in the future to be regarded as having acknowledged rights in the soil. The Acts of Settlement, how^ever, again unhinged all existing rights^ and not only swept away any legal claims possible on the part of the lowest tenants, but also interrupted any growth of customary rights. Up to the dates of the Penal and Commercial Codes the wrongs of Ireland are mainly to be found in that injustice which is inseparable from the *vae victis' of war. The history of the gravest wrongs of the native race begins from this period. The suppression of Irish manufactures, and the endeavours to stamp out the creed and to reduce to a minimum the established proprietary rights of native holders in the land, resulted in throwing on the soil for support the bulk of the native race in the position of mere tenants at will. Given the existence of these masses of precarious holders tied to the soil, and bound generation after generation to its culture, it is strange that mere lapse of time did not establish customary tenures, and that as the years rolled on the tenant at will did not evolve into the customary holder. In English copyhold, at any rate according to the legal theory'^ of the origin of copyhold rights, the growth of these rights of the servile class in the land can be traced from a starting point of which complete slavery and unlimited personal services, combined with a mere usufruct by favour, are the characteristics, to the point where the services are limited specifically and absorbed in a money 1 Sir William Petty estimated the remaining two-thirds. In 1672 he superficies of Ireland at 10,500,000 calculated that the possessions of the Irish acres, of which 7,500,000 were Church and of the Protestants amount- good land, the rest being moor, bog, ed to 5,140,000 acres. The Catholics and lake. In 1641 the lands of the holding about half this quantity. Hal* Church and of the Protestant owners lam. Vol. ii. p. 31)2 (note), amounted to about one-third of the - See ante, p. 33. good lands, the Catholics owning the VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 91 rent, and finally to the realization of freedom and determinate possessory rights\ Degraded as was the position of the Irish earth-tiller in the period following the accession of William the Third to the throne of England, it was in no way so desperate as the condition of the villeins of a Saxon manor over whom at the Conquest a Norman lord came to rule. The Saxon and the Norman, like the Irish and the English, present the spectacle of a conquered race settled on the land of their birth, but ruled by the stranger conqueror. In the former case not less than in the latter, sentiments of national hatred would tend to make the conqueror an oppressor, and the Norman yoke was heavy exceedingly : yet slowly but surely the villein established his rights in the soil, while the Irish peasant remained a pre- carious holder. The villein cultivator of the lord's demesne was but little in status above the mere beast of the field. Unable to leave the land without the lord's permission, if he ran away or was purloined he could be recovered by action ; holding his land at first at the unfettered will of the lord, by the meanest services, uncertain both in time and quantity ; prohibited from acquiring property, and liable if he even allowed the marriage of his daughter without the lord's permission to an action for damages for purloining property; could a more debased con- dition be possible ? Yet he reached security of tenure. The express or implied manumission by the lord, the growth of the customary rights in the holding, and the recognition of his title by the manorial courts, built him by slow degrees a fortress against unjust exactions and summary ejectments. There is no trace of a similar growth of proprietary rights in the case of the Irish tenant at will. It is often urged by the advocates of tenant-right in Ireland that the salvation of Irish laud would have been the wide- spread application of the manorial system, and it is too frequently forgotten that the rights of the precarious holders in a manor cannot be established by Act of Parliament, but have their origin in long user, and the recognition of customs by the manorial courts. The plan has been tried in many cases in Ireland as far as it is possible to create newly a system, ^ See Commons and Common Fields, T. E. Scrutton, p. 7. 92 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CHAP. the very essence of which is established custom. The large grants made by Henry the Second* were grants of Counties Palatine carrying all the rights of the creation of manorial courts; and Tipperary was also granted as a County Palatine to the Earl of Ormonde by Edward the Third. Again by 16 Car. I. c. 33, s. 9, confirmed by 21 & 22 Geo. III. c. 48 (Irish), every person having an allotment of lands of a specified extent was empowered to create a manor '^i while upon the settlement of the escheated counties in Ulster, and generally in the grants of land made in the reign of James the First, the creation of manors was allowed, and the holding of Courts Baron authorized. Many of the undertakers did create manors, the law permitting them to enfeoff tenants to hold of themselves (unlike the law in England) provided they did not so aliene more than a moiety of their allotment. The absence of the growth of customary rights among the precarious tenants must therefore be ascribed not to the w^ant of the manorial system, but to the fact that even in such a system the proprietary rights of the servile class can only be attained by long custom, not created instantly. The constant surge of change in the occupation of the land caused by the compulsory removals, whether by arbitrary evictions or by evictions for non-payment of rent, prevented the possibility of the acquisition of such rights by long user. The curse of absentee owners is responsible in a great measure for that total want amongst the lowest tenants of continuity in their holdings, which prevented the growth of customary rights. That such rights would have arisen in the natural course of events, had even the semblance of that consideration which always springs from personal relationships been present, is clear. In Ulster 1 See p. 44 ante, and refer to Koll est Chauncellerie, Chequier, et conis- of King's Council in Ireland 16 Ric.IL, sance des Plees si bien de la corone where a petition to the king from the come auties communes, et grantont Lord Justice and Council of Ireland auxint Chartres de Pardon." The says "Les Franchises grantez in Ire- Chronicles and Memorials of Great lande, que sont regale, tieles come Britain and Ireland during the Middle Duresme et Cestre, vous oustont si bien Ages. de les grantez profitez come de grant ^ Law of Landlord and Tenant in partie de obeisance des persones en- Ireland. J. S. Furlong, Vol. i. introd. fraunchies, et en chescune Fraunchise p. 15. VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 93 customary rights arose, so universal as to lead eventually to their formal recognition by the Legislature. The greatest wrongs inflicted over most of Ireland by the landlords upon the tenants were the deeds which prevented such a continuity of possession as would have fostered customary traits. The Parliamentary persecution of Ireland acted upon the land system even more disastrously by its indirect methods than by its deliberate land legislation. The different Acts repressive of Irish manufactures resulted in making sheep breeding, in conjunction with an immense smuggling traffic in wool, the most profitable use to which Irish land could be put. The creation of the extensive tracts of pasturage* necessary for the grazing farms entailed the eviction of great numbers of small holders. The lands were often in the hands of middle- men, and no trace of consideration for the position of the small tenantry was shown. The absentee owners also pressed their agents to obtain the utmost value from the land, and so far was the grazing system carried that, despite the remonstrance of the Irish Parliament, covenants restricting the breaking or plough- ing of the soil, were introduced in the leases of the larger tenantry ^ The effect of this mode of dealing with the land soon became apparent ; the limitation of the supply of plough-lands forced rents unnaturally high, with the effect that the Irish tenant, to whom land was a necessity, undertook to pay more than he was able. " The tenant was ruined by his liability to a charge out of all proportion to what the land could naturally produce, at any rate for a continued period, and the landlord became embarrassed by bankrupt tenants." How the tenant's hand was forced until an unnatural rent was offered is well shown by an allusion made in a remonstrance sent by the Northern Protestants to the Government in 1772, and quoted by Mr Justice Field^; "when the tenant's lease was ended they (the landlords) published in the newspapers that such a 1 The creation of pasturage was Act was not repealed till 1823. (4 Geo. further fostered by the fact that by IV. c. 99, s. 35). the Tithe Agistment Act, 1735, pasture 2 gee Field, pp. 267 and 268. land was exempted from tithe. This ^ Ibid. p. 270, note. 94 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CIIAP. parcel of land was to bo let, and that proposals in writing would be received for it. They invited every covetous, envious and malicious person to offer for his neighbour's possessions and improvements. The tenant, knowing he must be the highest bidder or turn out he knew not whither, would offer more than the value. If he complained to the landlord that it was too dear, the landlord answered that he knew it was so, but as it was in a trading country the tenant must make up the deficiency by his own industry." The diminution in the employment of labour caused by the substitution of grazing for tillage inflicted great misery, and we begin in the doings of the 'Houghers' in Connaught to be confronted with one species of the agrarian crime which has been so painfully prevalent in more recent times. The necessity of having at certain times a proportion of Protestant tenants on the lands in order to insure the return to Parliament of the landlord, also frequently led to the summary ejectment of bodies of Catholic small holders^ and hence by destroying existing tenancies prevented the acquisition of any customary rights. Again in the manner in which the enclosure of commons was carried on (generally with a view to increasing the grazing lands of the landlord) is to be found a frequent source of loss, and hence of probable ejection from his holding, to the tenant. For example, in Munster the excessive rents asked b}'' the landlords had been compensated by extensive grants of commonage, 3^et in many cases these commons were un- scrupulously enclosed and not the slightest reduction in rents made^. In a greater or less degree every imposition which burdened the tenant, or which aggravated the repellent feeling of landlord and tenant, tended to prejudice the latter's chance of security in his holding. A prominent place among the forces of social disunion was taken by the tithe question. The payment of tithes was a great burden on the Irish peasant ^ and embittered the relations 1 Notice a petition presented by the he had known as many as 120 processes CathoHcs in January, 1793. for tithes to be going on at the same 2 Sigerson, p. 128. time in the county of Limerick against 3 "Fitzgibbon, afterwards Earl of poor tenants." Field, p. 276. Clare, stated in 1786 in the House that VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 95 inter se of owner and occupier. Not only must it have seemed a hardship to the tenant to find the scanty fruits of his labour trenched upon for the support of a church which he abhorred, but also the fact that the great grazing estates of the large owners were exempt from this imposition \ must have seemed a most deliberate wrong. The tenant would keenly resent the fact that in Ulster the Protestant tenantry had succeeded in freeing themselves largely from this burden by the as- sertion of customs of exemption with regard to certain crops, for example, potatoes and flax, while he remained bound : and the modern history of Wales has taught the practical im- possibility of impressing on the mind of the tenant that the tithe is a charge on the land and had already been considered when the rent was fixed. The Irish tithes in addition were almost always sold by the incumbents and passed into the hands of the tithe-farmers while the 'canting' of tithes was also resorted to'"*. During the first half of the eighteenth century the Pro- testant ascendency was unbroken in the higher grades of the Irish social system, but as time passed the very completeness of this sovereignty led to a relaxation of some of the crushing burdens piled upon the Catholics. The Penal Code wa,s allowed to rust, and some degree of common interests sprung up between the two religions. There was a marked increase in those in- fallible signs of the prosperity of a community, the making of buildings, and the investment of money in the development of land. Unfortunately the improvement was strictly confined to the higher grades of society ; the English and Catholic landlords showed signs of a rapprochement, but the landlord and the tenant showed none. Even the relaxations of the Commercial Code became evils to the agricultural tenant by extending the amount of lands devoted to grazing. Agrarian troubles reached a crisis. The Levellers, who at first had limited their attempts to the forcible prevention of the en- closing of common lands ^, became a serious disturbing element 1 By the Tithe Agistment Act, 1735, 3 gge Sigerson, p. 128, quoting "An repealed 4 Geo. IV. c. 99, s. 35. enquiry into the causes of the outrages 2 Tico Centuries of Irish History, committed by the Levellers or White- edited by Prof. Bryce, p. 65. boys," 1762. 96 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CHAP. to the community, when, under the name of Whiteboys, they perpetrated outrages which were a menace to the peace of the country, and which were obviously aimed at the de- struction of the whole of the existing system of landlord and tenant. The rising of the Oak Boys^ in 1763 was originally directed against excessive road corvees, but afterwards took, like the Whiteboy rising, the form of general resistance to exactions, rack rents, and other features of the oppressive land system. These outbreaks, really the result of utter misery, were almost wantonly misunderstood by the Government, and arbitrary repressive Acts were passed. It was argued that the outbreaks were concocted in the French interest, and no attempt was made to investigate the true origin of the risings or to remedy the social evils which gave them birth. In 1771 came the Association of the "Hearts of SteeP," an organization produced by a set of circumstances typical of the manner in which Irish estates were managed by absentee owners. When the leases on a certain estate expired, the owner suddenly demanded large fines on renewal from his tenants ; these not being forthcoming the lands passed into the hands of a group of speculators, and a wholesale eviction, whereby the tenants lost not only their homesteads but also the value of their improvements, followed. When too a body of Catholic tenantry was established under these speculators (for in the case alluded to the ejected tenants were Protestants) their position was most miserable ; for the middlemen, who had paid the fine and taken up the leases as a speculation solely for profit, were men "who not content with moderate interest for their money, racked the tenants to a pitch beyond the reach of the old tenants ^" 1 Sigerson, p. 130. their petition to the Government, par- 2 Both the "Oak Boys" and the ticular stress was laid on the exaction "Hearts of Steel" were exclusively of the county cess: it would appear Protestant organizations : this is a re- that the cause of their complaint in markable proof that the struggle be- this case was not so much the amount tween nation and nation, or creed and of the exaction as the fact that it was creed, was rapidly changing to a class often misappropriated, and used by war between landlord and tenant. those whom they held to be tyrants for 2 Among the many grievances ad- their private advantage. See Field, vanced by the "Hearts of Steel" in p. 277. VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 97 In 1757 the Duke of Bedford had promised to abridge the penal laws, and to a large extent their rigour had been lessened as regards the Catholic gentry ; but the position of the Catholic peasant remained unaltered, and the land law was a terrible burden. Bad as was the position of the Protestant small holder, that of the Catholic was worse ; they shared in common the evils of a system in which the landlord was all powerful, but the Catholic was burdened with additional preventives to the possession of a secure interest in the land. The heredi- tary sentiment which bound the native race to Ireland being wanting in the case of the Protestant settlers, masses of the Protestant tenantry, as had been the case earlier ^ abandoned the land, which seemed under a curse, and emigrated to America. At lenorth a sliofht amelioration of the case of the Catholic tenants was effected by an Act of 1771 ^ by which under certain stringent conditions they were allowed to undertake the re- clamation of bog-land. In 1775 the American war broke out, and reacted upon Irish affairs by causing a relaxation of the fetters in which the country had so long been bound. A really useful Act was passed in 1778^ enabling the Irish to take leases for 999 years or five lives\ It is to be feared, however, that the origin of this Act lay not so much in consideration for the sufferings of the Catholic tenantry^ as because the landlords found that unless some security of tenure was granted it was hopeless to expect the tenant to improve the soil. In 1779 came the repeal of the Restriction Acts, and but for the trade jealousy of England the Commercial Code would have been wholly repealed. This course was really necessary, for the war with America had closed the chief marts for Irish goods, and more misery and discontent was added to Ireland's already brimming cup. The weakness of England was Ireland's opportunity. In 1782 Grattan, backed by the volunteers (which the exigencies of England during her American war had compelled her to allow Ireland to organize for self-defence), succeeded in gaining ^ During the oppression of the Pro- ^ 17 & is Geo. III. c. 49 (Irish), testant party by Tyreonnel. Ante, ^ See Sigerson, pp. 132 — 134. p. 83. 5 This was, however, the 3'ear of the 2 11 & 12 Geo. III. c. 21 (Irish). Catholic Belief Bill. M. 7 98 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [(^HAP. an Independent Parliament, and obtained the repeal of Poyning's Act. Legislative freedom, however, brought no benefit to the radical evils of the land system, though commerce and manu- facture relieved from restraint grew and increased prodigiously. The fact that the peasantry were deeply imbued, and with reason, with the idea that the influence of the laws was exerted solely in favour of the landlords, operated largely to defeat even beneficent legislation. Long leases were frequently granted after the Acts of Settlement, but these passing exclusively into the hands of middlemen and never direct to the tenants, only aggravated the evils of their position. The law of distress also was by itself enough to fix for ever in their minds the idea that the landlord was an unjust taskmaster, and the law his complaisant helpmeet. The remedy of distress was indeed recognized by the Brehon Law to the fullest degree, in fact it may be considered to have been the universal mode of procedure for the recovery of any claim ; and the Senchus Mor with its provisions for notice to the defendant, for the 'stay,' and for a near equivalent to replevin, shows a highly elaborate system. In two ways, however, it completely differed from the English law of distress, (1) the remedy was entirely extra- judicial, and (2) it was applicable (resembling in this the Teutonic distress) to all cases and not merely to certain specified classes of claims \ The feudal law of distress undoubtedly developed into a powerful weapon for the landlord. When there was a difference between him and the tenant, he was able as feudal superior to seize the tenant's goods ; the Common Law rule that the goods so seized could not be sold was supple- mented by a statute giving this power, and a further Act enabled him to seize growing crops ^ The tenant's rights con- ^ The late Sir Henry Maine pointed Early Hist, of Inst., lecture x. ; see also out that this last fact opened a wide quotation from Edmund Spenser there field for probable injustice on the part given. of the English settlers to the native ^ Qne of the recommendations of Irish, for the statutes which made an the Devon Commissioners was that unlawful distress a capital felony would this statute should be repealed and the punish the native in many cases for costs of a distress strictly limited, using the only method for recovery of The original theory of the feudal a claim with which he was acquainted. distress regarded it as a means of VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 99 sisted merel}' in a resort to the dangerous action of replevin which entailed his giving a bond with two responsible sureties, to double the value of the goods distrained, as security that he would prosecute the suit with effect and without delay. It was the gradual amendment of the law in favour of the tenant, by imposing the observance of many legal techni- calities (with an accompanying penalty as to a trespasser ab initio) on the distrainor, which led to a later stage of the Irish land history when, on account of the legal difficulties in- volved, the process of distress was adopted as a last resource by the landlord \ In the past century the most patent evils of the land system had been the frequent changes of tenancy in the small holdings and the not unfrequent blotting out of large numbers of such holdings, which prevented the peasant from attaining any security of tenure by the growth of customary rights. A new phase of the land question was now entered upon, inse- curity of tenure still marked the small Irish holdings but instead of a tendency to unduly restrict their number they were created with a most disastrous prodigality. The immense cultivation of the potato, Raleigh's ' fatal gift,' brought the most terrible attendant evils. Easy of cultivation, and re- quiring but small plots of land for its production in large quantities, it fostered an increase of population entirely out of proportion to the land to which it looked for its exclusive support. The famine of 1739 brought no lesson to the im- provident peasantry, and the commercial developments of 1782 to 1800 did not aid the case of the small agricultural holders. The desire of the landlords for political influence^ led them to increase the number of the small holdings to such an extent that, considered with regard to its effect on the agricultural compelling the performance of the ^ lb. p. 40. feudal services, and did not contem- 2 Before the Reform Act many of plate such a case as the recovery of the counties were absolutely subser- rent, therefore the goods of the tenant vient to the landlord interest. Imt. of might by the Statute of Marlbridge English Government, Homersham Cox, be merely retained as a pledge and not p. 108. Lord Farnborough's Gonsti- sold. Richey, Irish Land Laws, p. 40. tutional History, Vol. i. p. 298. 7—2 100 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [chap. system, the Acts of 1771, 1778 and 1782 which enabled Catho- lics to hold land, and the Act of 1793 which granted them the 405. franchise, must be looked upon as evils despite their mani- fest equity of principle. The small holdings created for the purpose of securing a weighty tenant vote were let at rents exceeding their true worth, owing to the increase in the value of land caused by war prices, and the small freeholder was at once, upon prices regaining their normal level, involved in difficulties ; whilst the landlord on his part, despite the pro- visions of the Eviction Act 1816^ and the Subletting Act 1826 ^ was burdened by bankrupt tenants. The following table will illustrate the rapid growth of the small freeholds, caused by the desire for political influence felt by the landlords, and the avid eagerness of the Irish peasantry for small holdings. Freeholds, 1795—18301 40s. £20 £50 Total 1795 4,768 408 344 5,520 1796 64,752 5,109 3,195 73,056 1803 157,159 10,096 7,009 174,264 1821 184,229 15,139 11,066 210,431 1828 191,732 6,806 18,369 216,907 1830 14,246 7,639 17,819 39,704 After the abolition in 1829* of the 405. freehold suffrage, the tenancies mostly took the form of tenancies from year to year ; for the rise in the value of land, which had been caused by the outbreak of the French war and the depreciation of the cur- rency, had been followed by a subsequent depression, and the landlords had realized the fact that under a lease by which a certain rent was reserved they reaped no benefit from an in- crease in the value of land, while a fall invariably involved them in the losses of the tenant. For the same reason they sought to 1 56 Geo. III. c. 88. 2 7 Geo. IV. c. 29. 2 Taken from the statistical article on Ireland in Encyc. Brit, by Mr T. F. Henderson. ^ 10 Geo. IV. c. 8. VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 101 consolidate their interest, and large clearances were the result of a desire to substitute large farms for small holdings. This is alluded to as a necessary evil in the report of the Select Com- mittee of the House of Commons in 1830\ Leases were, how- ever, still sometimes granted from political motives until the uncertainty of the tenant vote and the extension of the suffrage in 1850 by 13 & 14 Vict. c. 69 to the occupiers of land of the annual rating of £12 extinguished this cause for their creation. ^ After 1838, on account of the burden of the poor laws many small holdings were abolished and large farms substituted. UNIVEE8ITY CHAPTER VII. Ireland from 1800 to 1850. Irish legislative independence failed to produce those golden results which were hoped for from it, and the brief period of its existence calls for little notice. Cases of indi- vidual patriotism stand out against a background of general corruption, and the wit and eloquence of Ireland glitter with that seductive charm which they unfortunately associate with no commensurate result. The advantages gained by the in- creased commerce and manufacturing successes of the nation were more than counterbalanced by the immense increase of population which rose from 2,845,932 in 1785 to 5,356,594 in 1803. The failure of Ireland to govern herself was due to many causes. Noticeably, the unwise policy of the leaders of the peo- ple who encouraged the anti-English feeling, and the wild surge of disappointed passions in a people who had expected a millen- nium and were tortured perpetually with new hopes of increased freedom, which vanished as soon as seen. Secret societies were formed, and that worst side of the Celtic character, which would attain its end whatever the means used may be, became promi- nent. The lawless example of France, and the real misery of the agricultural population, bore fruit. In 1798 rebellion broke out, in the form of a murderous revolt organized and set on foot by the 'United Irishmen.' Union with England was now un- avoidable ; taught again the lesson that concession to Ireland was merely regarded as weakness, England took the reins into her own hands. By whatever means the Union was carried (and the means employed were far from meritorious) it was undoubtedly at CHAP. VII.] IRELAND FROM ISOO TO 1850. 103 this time the only alternative to complete separation, and the Union of 1801^ was probably for Ireland, and certainly for England, the best step that could have been taken. It was signalized, however, by no improvement in the strained relations of the land classes in Ireland, and causes were at work tending to again rain havoc on the peasants. The passing of the Union withdrew to England a still greater portion of the landowning class, and absenteeism^ became the rule; while the expenditure and extravagance of the Irish landlords was increased by their being brought into contact with the wealthy landlords of England, and with a society which normally lived above its resources. The class of middlemen which absenteeism fostered were utterly wanting in feeling for the needs of the agricultural tenant, and regarded them solely iu the light of a rent-paying machine; while, as has been said, the rise in prices caused by the French war produced an increase in the value of the land, so that leases were taken by the tenants at exorbitant rents. The increase of population continued with terrible rapidity, in 1841 it reached 8,175,124, in 1845 nearly nine millions"^, and the whole nation were competitors for the land. This, as has been shown, together with the cultivation of the potato, which made minute subdivisions of the land possible, and the readiness of the landlords to grant small holdings from political motives, settled on the land a load of peasant tenants which it was completely unable to support, save in a time of excep- tional prosperity. The nature of the holdings thus created is well described by Mr Shaw Lefevre, who says " throughout a great part of the West and South of Ireland, every facility was given to the letting of lands in small holdings of from half an acre up to five or six acres. On taking possession the 1 Act of Union 1800, 39 & 40 Geo. Ireland, p. 265, "Magnates and others III. c. 67. also, who dwell in England, or else- 2 A very curious proof of how early where out of this land, and draw the the evils of absenteeism began to be profitsof their lands out of this counti-y, felt in Ireland is given by the following and send nothing for the preservation extract from The Black Book of Holy of their holdings, or their tenants' Trinity Church, Dublin, 26 Edw, I. security, shall etc." (1297) quoted by Sir William Betham 3 t^jekl, p. 282. in his Constitutions of Enyland and 104 Ireland from 1800 to 1850. [chap. tenant would himself build a mud hut at little cost; a few weeks of labour sufficed for preparing the land for potatoes, digging the crop, and cutting turf for fuel from the common bog; the rent was usually paid in labour and the spare time was spent in fishing, or in work at a distance. The general social condition of this class was as low as it is possible to conceive. They constituted nearly half the population of Ireland, and, with rare exceptions, lived in cabins with one room only, which they often shared with their pigs. There was no inducement to them to improve their condition, either from a healthy competition with their neighbours, or from a sense of security in their holdings^". The depression of prices in 1816 and the following years brought financial troubles not only upon the peasant class, but also upon the landlords who had entered upon extravagant modes of living, calculated upon the false basis of the apparently high rent-roll of their estates; a purely fancy sum produced by unlimited competitive demand and limited supply. The rents, which had doubled in thirty years, melted at once on the normal balance of value being reached: still such was the demand for peasant holdings that, whatever might prove ultimately to be the solvency of the candidates, no landlord found a difficulty in letting his land even at a high rent. The agricultural tenants being thus eager to obtain the land, the nature of the tenure granted them was naturally regulated by the wishes of the landlord class, and these were almost universally swayed by the desire for political influence. Until 1829, when the annual value was raised to ten pounds, a freehold rated at 40^. was the qualification for a vote, hence until the Reform Act a freehold became the general estate granted; but it was a freehold of the smallest possible kind, viz. an estate for life only, and it is apparent that such a tenure was absolutely hostile to any chance of improvement in the soil or to any agricultural development of the holdings. Indeed it may be considered that the tenants were only in a technical sense freeholders, the landlord's influence over them being scarcely less than that exercised over the tenants from year to 1 Peel and O'Connell, Rt. Hon. G. Shaw Lefevre, p. 257. til] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. 105 year, as by keeping a 'hanging gale' over them he could, by the threat of demanding immediate payment, prejudice their position \ Leaseholds for terms of years were then granted, but this tenure became unpopular with the landlords ^ and as political motives ceased to influence the lettings (for the tenantry were often avowedly hostile to the landlord's political party) the small holdings came to be held largely either (1) from year to year or (2) at will, and after the Act of 1850* this practice became almost universal. Tenancies from year to year, which for some curious reason the Irish tenants have always regarded as a species of tenancy in perpetuity, dated from the reign of Henry the Eighth, when Potkyn's case^ first gave them legal recognition. In several ways the development of this system of letting is interesting. Until the reign of George the Third it could only be founded either on express agreement, or upon implication arising from the acts of the parties or from the payment of rent; for the doubt as to what mode of tenancy should be implied when the letting did not specify it, was held to be decided on the ground of the mode of letting most common at the time of the creation of the tenancy. This was held to be tenancy at will until the time of Lord Mansfield, and as regards tenancies created after that date, from year to year^ At first these tenancies were created by an express demise for one year, and then from year to year as long as both parties desired, at an annual rent. They can now be created in this w^ay, but when this is the case can only be terminated at the end of the second year of holding, or, if the tenancy has continued longer than this, then by the ordinary methods for determining an estate from year to year®. ^ Peel and O'Connell, G. Shaw Le- ancy, which they regarded as unlimited fevre, p. 104. in extent. 2 See ante, page 100. It was stated s gee ante, p. 101. before the Bessborough Committee that ^ Year Book, 14 Hen. VIII. foL 10. the tenantry also were averse to the ^ Timmons v. Rowlinson, 3 Burr idea of long terms, holding that they 1603. Shore v. Porter, 3 T. R. 13. were a derogation of their rights in the ^ Furlong's Landlord and Tenant, soil and preferred a year to year ten- Vol. i. Intro, p. 35. 106 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. The most usual form of these tenancies in modern times was where they were implied without the existence of a written agreement from the payment of rent. This tenure was always looked upon by the tenants as being practically in per- petuity, and under it they Avould at least to a certain extent improve the lands, which it was almost impossible to induce them to do under tenures for a term of years. They considered a holding for a term certain to be an invasion of their rights in the soil, and on the termination of such lettings returned the land 'run out.' It is evident that this tenancy from year to year was capable of grave abuses ; the landlord, by serving a notice to quit, could compel the tenant either to surrender his holding and abandon the improvements he had made, or pay an increased rent. Only too frequently this plan was adopted, and it had the invariable result of causing the tenant to accept the higher rent, the ultimate consequence of which was his ruin and eviction. A mistake frequently made in speaking of these tenures was pointed out by the late Dr Richey\ namely, the statement that the tenant had no right to sell or sublet to whom he pleased. The origin of the mistake arises in the fact that the tenant could pass no greater estate than rested in him, that is merely the term of the year, at the end of which the tenancy, unless the landlord consented to the new tenant, determined. It is therefore obvious that save with the consent of the landlord no very valuable estate in the land could be passed. This was undoubtedly considered a wrong by the tenants who, consider- ing their holdings in the light of a perpetuity, could not com- prehend the apparent restraint upon alienation. Tenancies at will, amounting in result to a holding only for as long as the landlord pleased, were not as common as those from year to year; for as will be seen from what has been said relative to the yearly tenancies, a tenancy at will could only be created in modern times by express agreement, or implied where the circumstances of the case preclude the possibility of a tenancy from year to year having been contem- plated. 1 Irish Land Laios, p. 88. VIL] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. 107 Under the influence of a certain set of causes the history of the small holdings has been traced from 1800 to 1850. It has been seen that the number of these holdings increased largely, and that their tenure, at first generally that of freeholds for life, became changed to a system of tenancy from year to year. But during this epoch many other causes were at work as well, and other and most potent circumstances were widening the breach between landlord and tenant, and were desolating the unhappy kingdom. Protestant omnipotence had been rudely shaken; the agitation of O'Connell and the efforts of the priests had roused from the torpor of despair the passions of the Celtic race; concessions such as the Catholic emancipation had been wrung from unwilling masters, not freely given ; the money obtained from rents which ground the tenant holders to the dust for the most part passed out of the country to a clique of owners, alien in race and religion ; while bitterness of feeling was fomented by the fact that after 1838, to free themselves from the burden of the poor laws, the landlords in many cases abolished the small holdino^s and created laroje farms. In order to do this, and in order to compel the payment of rents which were really beyond the powers of the small holders, the landlords em- ployed that machinery of the law which at this time could always be relied on to aid their class. In 1816 an Eviction Act had been passed, and gigantic " clearances " became the rule. The small holders were driven in crowds from the homes to which they were bound by a hundred ties of old association and tradition, which they regarded as their inalien- able property, and the value of which was mainly owing to the improvements they had themselves made\ Such associa- ' "It is admitted on all hands, that building or fencing is done by the according to the general practice in tenant, and in the ordinary language Ireland, the landlord builds neither of the country, dwelling-houses, farm dwelling-house nor farm offices, nor buildings and even the making of puts fences, gates, etc. into good order fences are described by the general before he lets his land to a tenant. words 'improvements,' which is thus The cases when a landlord does any employed to denote the necessary ad- of these things are the exception. The juncts to a farm, without which, in system of giving aid in these matters is England or Scotland, no tenant would becoming more prevalent. In most be found to rent it," Report of the cases whatever is done in the way of Devon Commissioners, p. 1122. It is 108 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. tions as the Ribbonmen are not produced without a feeling of intense class hatred ; and complete alienation of thought and sympathy between the dominant and the servient class pre- vailed. Just at the time when this antagonism was most marked; when the peasants, ejected from their holdings in vast numbers, became the movers in every species of agrarian combination; when the absolute destitution that prevailed amongst the lower ranks of the people drove them to complete dependence on the potato for food, and made cultivation of it by every poverty- stricken squatter the sole sustenance of his household ; when continued bad times had dissipated any shadow of that reserve fund which the improvident peasant so rarely laid by, the food which was the very life of the nation, failed. This failure, partial in 1845 and complete in 1846, brought famine with fever in its train, and death dark-winged brooded over the face of the land. Misery and despair seized the people, and horrors unimaginable crowd the history of the terrible year that turned the country into one vast grave. No words can paint the scenes that were the every day history of that time. The clarion had been sounded however, class pre- judice, religious antagonism, national differences, were lost for the while. England rose to help the dying and to fight as far as lay in her power the inexorable forces of starvation and disease. From the cot and from the castle the wealth of England was poured in no scanty stream to succour and sustain. Alas, the magnitude of the awful crisis was far beyond the power of hurried organization and defective plans to cope with, €ven though into the lap of the perishing nation was flung the riches of a mighty kingdom. Public works on a gigantic basis were schemed, but the starving people dropped dead as they worked, labour and exposure being fatal ; and the plan, which had developed into a mass of jobbery, was abandoned. Re- notable in contrast to the above that enabled every ecclesiastical dignitary to as early as the reign of William III. recover from his successor two-thirds compensation for permanent improve- of the money laid out on necessary ments was given to the Protestant ec- improvements. See Sigerson, pp. 108 clesiastics, for 10 Will. III. c. 6 (Irish) —110. VII.] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. 109 course was then had to large supplies of food rations ; but despite all efforts 200,000 to 300,000 perished of famine or disease. When the ghastly picture is considered, one is filled with surprise that the efforts of England — which, though they came late in the day and were deficient in their modes of appli- cation, yet represented a large-hearted generosity and a national sympathy with distress which should have appealed strongly to the Celtic character — were not the basis of a bond of union between the two nations. Had a permanent understanding been built up on the basis of this stupendous catastrophe one would (bearing in mind the miserable history of crime and bloodshed caused by the antagonism of race and creed) have hesitated to call it dearly bought even at the price of so appalling a sacrifice of life. Alas, the breach was widened rather than bridged, the lack of gratitude shown by the Irish people further prejudiced English opinion against them. This forgetfulness of deep obligations is strange, for the facts appeal strongly even to very prejudiced critics. Mr Sul- livan in his New Ireland says, "Even the dark cloud of Irish famine had its silver lining. If it is painful to recall the disastrous errors of irresolution and panic, one can linger grate- fully over memories of Samaritan philanthropy, of efficacious generosity, of tenderest sympathy. The people of England behaved nobly.... From every considerable town in England there poured subscriptions, amounting in the aggregate to hundreds of thousands of pounds \" Again speaking of the resident landlords he says, " No adequate tribute has ever been paid to the memory of those Irish landlords — and they were men of every party and creed — who perished martyrs to duty in that awful time ; who did not fly the plague-reeking work- house or fever-tainted court. Their names would make a goodly roll of honour'"^ " ; and he further pays a well-deserved tribute to the courage and humanity displayed by many of the Protestant clergy. Events have proved nevertheless that the severance between 1 Vol. I. p. 139. 2 Vol. I. p. 133 (note). 110 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. landlord and tenant was even more complete after the famine than before, and as the critical complications of the land system are in the main due to the absence of sympathy between the two classes, it is important to notice the reasons which caused the Irish people to look on the famine as a slaughter for which the English were responsible. That in a great measure this was owing to the unscrupulous misrepresentation of political agitators, and to the readiness of the peasant class to ascribe their misfortunes to any cause rather than their own impro- vidence, is true; but it was partially also the result of minor concurrent errors on the part of England which, placed in the scale of national animosity, outweighed all the self-sacrifice and generosity displayed by her. The regulation which made the surrender of land a condition precedent to poor law relief; the breakdown of the poor law system, an event neither re- markable nor culpable seeing that it was but newly established and quite unsuited to wrestle with such an unforeseen and gigantic calamity; the evictions and clearances which had turned thousands from their homes ; the ' famine clearances ' (rendered necessary from the landlord's point of view by the fact that the destitute peasantry were unable to find means to till the soil, and that rent paying was the exception) ; and the opposition in England to many of the plans for free ports and abolition of duties \ assumed to the Irish, seeking eagerly for some blamable person on whom to lavish the bitter wrath that their miseries had raised in them, the shape of crimes of terrible magnitude. The passion and prejudice of the Celt again flung itself in wild fury against the dominant class. Emigration, which en- tailed great hardships, followed the famine, and not less than two millions of the population were scattered over the face of the earth, principally in England and America. Fenianism began to spread, originating amongst the Irish in America, while revolt simmered constantly under the surface of Irish politics at home. Twice it took head, once in the feeble and 1 In reality this opposition was then fighting the corn law battle purely owing to the party principles of in England, the protectionists being protection and free trade which were afraid of granting a precedent. Vn.] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. Ill futile revolution of 1848 and again in the risings in 1867 ; while plot and intrigue against the Government went on unceasingly. Even before the famine the fall of prices and the con- sequent failure of rents had involved a large number of the landlords in financial difficulties. Estates were frequently mortgaged up to the hilt and charged with every species of incumbrance, and the expensive and complex procedure of the Court of Chancery was found unsuited to meet the difficulties presented by an attempted sale of estates so burdened ; while it was the only means by which an incumbrancer could pro- ceed. The disadvantage of the system of incumbered estates in the hands of absentee and unbusinesslike owners was per- sistently pressed, and the substitution of practical men, who would take personal concern in the paying development of the land, and whose direct interest would be involved in making permanent profit from their estates, urged ; the aid of legisla- ture was invoked, and an Act, 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48, known as the Incumbered Estates Act, 1848, was passed. The purpose aimed at cannot be better described than in the words of Mr Gladstone, who in 1870, speaking of this Act, said\ " It had a most benevolent object ; it was intended to introduce capital into Ireland, to relieve impoverished pro- prietors of that country from that which was to them not a privilege but a burden — the possession of land which they could not rightly use or manage — and to transfer it into the hands of a more vigorous and opulent race of proprietors with a view to the development of the riches of the soil." The means employed in this Act to produce these effects are best shown by a reference to the Act itself Section 2 enacted ''that where any land in Ireland shall be subject to any Incumbrance it shall be lawful for the owner of such land to contract (subject to the approval of the Court) for the sale thereof, freed from all such Incumbrances, and such sale, if approved by the Court, shall be carried into effect under the provisions of this Act ; and that any such owner, or any person being an incumbrancer 1 Hansard, 3rd series, cxcix. p. 344. 112 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. on such land in possession of the Title Deeds and writings relating thereto, without having so contracted, may apply to the Court for the sale of such land under the provisions of this Act\" The modus operandi of the Act was that on payment into Court of the purchase money (which was divided amongst the parties entitled according to their claims) the purchaser received a parliamentary title free from incum- brances. Large numbers of landlords whose estates were hopelessly involved, and to whom the famine with its attendant failure of rent and increase of taxation had brought ruin, flocked to the Courts. By the end of 1858 there had been 8,300 conveyances, and purchase money to the amount of twenty-three millions had passed through the Court ^ ; while so satisfactory was the working of the Act, that in 1858 "The Irish Landed Estate Act," 21 & 22 Vict. c. 72, extended the same principle even to unincumbered estates. Constant applications have been made tmder these Acts, until at the present time over £52,000,000 has been invested in the purchase of Irish land. The class of landlord created by the purchases has not been very satisfactory. The purely business element which characterised the purchase of lands from the Court as a specu- lation, excluded any feeling of reciprocal obligations founded on a bond of personal acquaintance as distinguished from legal relations, and the 'new man' proved even more obnoxious to the Irish peasant than the landlord to whose faults he was ac- customed and with whose foibles he was acquainted. It is a curious but undeniable trait of the Celtic character that even an unjust landlord becomes in some sort hallowed by long asso- ciation; while a new comer, unacquainted in all probability with the curious turns of Irish character, gives mortal offence and stirs up unending rancour by the doing of acts often both beneficial and well meant, simply because his more businesslike methods are not understood and his insistence on his rights is considered a wrong. 1 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48, sec. 2. other foreign purchasers, and twenty 2 See Field, p. 285, "of this total, millions represented Irish capital in- three millions came from English and vested in land." VII.] IRELAND FROM 1800 — 1850. 113 The deep acquaintance with Irish character necessary to fully appreciate that while the peasants can be led to almost anything, they can be driven to nothing, was not likely to be found in the speculative purchaser of an estate ; nor would he easily realise that in Ireland the ideas of justice and custom are inextricably mingled. Moreover the landlords of large estates are far more likely to deal liberally with their tenants than petty proprietors, and during the first eight years' working of the Incumbered Estates' Act, 3,197 estates passed into the hands of 7,216 purchasers. On the other hand the more business-like characteristics of the new landlords, and the practical interest which they took in the cultivation of their lands, tended to largely increase the surface prosperity of Ireland ; while the more reasonable system of agriculture rendered possible by the relief afforded to the land by the removal of the surplus population, and the thinned numbers of the destitute (for the famine had re- sulted in a literal 'survival of the fittest'), operated in the same direction. Wealth grew and expanded, railways were increased and extended, and facilities for connecting the pro- ducing districts with the centres of sale sprang up. Every- where an apparent prosperity was presented which, though afterwards proved to be illusionary and to have rested on no firm basis, for the time being deceived even shrewd observers. The Irish agrarian troubles seemed things of the past, and the 'Young Ireland' and Fenian risings were neither very con- siderable nor attended with much important result. The very causes, however, which were rendering the land more valuable, were but increasing the stakes for which land- lord and tenant were playing. If the conflicting claims of the landlord's legal title and the tenant's (assumed) moral right had given rise to desperate bitterness of feeling even when only an acre holding and a mud hovel were at stake, naturally the passions were still more excited when interests of substantial value were concerned. The era too of Protestant ascendency had waned. The Catholic Church was now an institution of immense power. Exclusively interested in the tenant, it brought to bear against the landlord class the whole influence M. 8 114 IRELAND FROM 1800 — 1850. [CHAP. VII. of organization, and became the binding force of the native element of disunion. The landlord grasped but more firmly at his rights when he felt the sceptre slipping from him, and under the smiling mask of order the two classes braced themselves for a struggle to the death. i PAKT III. THE IRELAND OF TO-DAY. 8-2 CHAPTER VIII. Ulster Tenant-right and the Devon Commission. It has been shown that amongst the small holders in Ireland the system of tenure was, from various causes, almost exclusively- reduced to a mere holding from year to year; and that under this system (despite the irradicable impression of the Irish peasantry that it amounted to a tenure in perpetuity) the landlord was able to crush out the tenant's interest in the land. It has been shown also that while all the improvements were the work of the occupier he neither acquired a secure interest in his holding, nor any right of compensation if the fruits of his labour were appropriated. In addition it has been pointed out that in the main part of Ireland no customary rights were acquired by the precarious holders. In Ulster, however, things were different, and almost from the time of the formation of the settlement in the reign of James the First, the Protestant tenantry began to rapidly thrive and prosper ; whilst a customary usage, so wide- spread as finally to obtain the formal recognition of the Legislature ^ gradually developed. The origin and spread of this Ulster tenant-right is both interesting and important in the history of Irish land law, and the custom has to many persons represented a system which, if extended throughout Ireland, would have solved the agra- rian troubles. But as will be seen — though greatly preferable to the total insecurity of tenure prevalent in other parts of the country — it is in some ways unsatisfactory. ^ See post, p. 140. 118 ITLSTEH TENANT-RIGHT [CHAP. In 1843 Sir Robert Peel promised that a Royal Commission should be appointed to examine the nature of the tenure of land in Ireland, and on the 20th of November in that year the Com- mission accordingly issued, and was directed to five gentlemen well acquainted with that country. The inquiry then conducted, and known by the name of the Devon Commission, throws much light on the nature of landed relations throughout Ireland, and lays considerable stress on the existence and beneficial working of the Ulster customs. Unfortunately no effort was made to represent the tenant interest among the Commissioners appointed, and the scheme was therefore at once attacked as being purely in the interest of the landlord ; O'Connell remarking " you might as well consult butchers about keeping Lent as consult these men about the rights of farmers \" Still, despite the prejudice displayed against it, a most valuable amount of evidence was collected, and had any immediate legislative action been taken on the strength of the report presented, it seems likely that commendable reforms might have been instituted and much of the after troubles of the land question avoided. The report is perhaps scarcely bold enough, but it bears every trace of studied impartiality. It is of course impossible to deal with it at length, but an examination of the most notable points shows that the Commission recognized the substantial justice of many of the claims for fixity of tenure'^, and the crying need for a fair remuneration to the tenant for the money and labour expended by him in permanent improvements. The Commissioners rightly ascribed the un- deniable evils existing in the land system to the alienation of sympathy between landlord and tenant, and stated that " the foundation of almost all the evils by which the social condition of Ireland is disturbed, is to be traced to those feelings of mutual distrust, which too often separate the classes of land- lord and tenant, and prevent all united exertion for the common benefit^" The Devon Commission brought into great prominence the 1 Peel and O'Connell by the Rt Hon. Devon Commission, p. 1122. Shaw Lefevre, p. 234. » Ibid. p. 1166. ' See Digest of Evidence before VIII.] AND THE DEVON COMMISSION. 119 fact that the comparative quiescence of the north of Ireland, which contrasted strongly with the disturbed state of landed relations throughout the rest of the country, was due to the existence of the Ulster custom being generally * either authorized or connived at by the landlord.' This custom of tenant-right — a thing at that time absolutely without the sanction of law — consisted of an assumed right on the part of the tenant to sell the goodwill of his holding subject to its rent. Such a custom was naturally regarded from different points of view by the landlord and the tenant. This is well illustrated by two definitions of tenant-right quoted by Mr Seebohm. The landlord defines it thus^ ; "tenant-right is a custom under which the tenant farmers in the north of Ireland — or, at all events, in those districts where the custom prevails — expect when they have occasion to give up their farms, that their land- lords will allow them to obtain from the incoming tenant such a sum as shall remunerate them for their improvements upon those farms. . .and for the goodwill of the farm." From the stand- point of the tenant it is defined as follows; "tenant-right I consider to be the claim of the tenant and his heirs to continue in undisturbed possession of the farm so long as the rent is paid ; and in case of ejectment, or in the event of a change of occupancy, whether at the wish of the landlord or tenant, it is the sum of money which the new occupier must pay to the old one for the peaceable enjoyment of his holding." The Ulster custom tended to enhance the belief on the part of the tenant that his interest in his holding was a perpetual one, for it was stated before the Commission'^ that while the price of the tenant-right frequently amounted to £10, £12, £20 or £25 per acre, and sometimes rose as high as forty years' purchase, the price was not much affected by the tenure on which the land was held, the practice extending to the sale of farms held even from year to year. The right of sale existed 1 " The Land Question," F. See- Mr J. Hancock given before the Land- bohm, Fortnightly Review, 1869, the lord and Tenant Commissioners 1844. first definition quoted is that of ^ See Digest of Evidence before Lord Dufferin before Mr Maguire's Devon Commission, pp. 290, 291. Committee, 1864, — the second that of 120 ULSTER TENANT-RIGHT [CHAP. independent of any improvements having been made by the tenant, and in practice it appeared that it was rarely exercised by an improving tenant, whilst one who had deteriorated his holding was not by that fact precluded from selling. The custom affected more than the rights of possession and sale, it restrained the legal power of the landlord to regulate the rent. Its incidents are well summarised by Mr Justice Field* as follows "^ : — 1. "Free sale, subject however to the landlord's right (a) to reject a purchaser upon reasonable grounds, (6) to be paid all arrears of rent due from the seller, (c) to limit the price, that it may not encroach on the value of the landlord's interest. 2. A right of continuous and undisturbed occupancy so long as the rent is paid, subject however to the landlord's right of terminating this occupancy by paying the tenant the market value of his tenant-right. 3. The right to hold at a fair rent, lower than a competi- tion or commercial rent^." The exact origin of this tenant-right is not clearly traceable, but it had its inception in the plantation of James the First, arising not so much from the actual form of the grants then made*, as from a certain sturdy self-assertiveness in the colony imported, aided by the fact that more of the landlords were resident. Evictions were less frequent in Ulster, and a larger number of the small holders being Protestants they were more in touch with the landlords than was the case elsewhere in Ireland. Continuity of tenure by the tenants 1 A Judge of the High Court of Judi- disputed, some ascribing the creation cature at Fort William, Bengal. of the custom to their laxity. At pre- 2 Landholding and the Belation of sent throughout Ireland about 584,327 Landlord and Tenant, p. 288. acres of agricultural land are held by 3 See post, p. 141. trustees for Charities and public com- ^ At the time of the plantation of panies. An interesting table of the JamestheFirst,muchland was allotted values given for the tenant-right in to the London Companies and also to various holdings during the years the Irish Society. It is not unfre- 1873 to 1880 is given by Mr Finlay quently alleged that these Companies Dun in his Landlords and Tenants in proved hard landlords, but it seems Ireland, pp. 130 and 131. without foundation, and the view is VIII.] AND THE DEVON COMMISSION. 121 probably established by degrees a customary authority which ultimately extended equally to Protestant and Catholic; for when the repression of Irish manufactures drove large masses of the Protestant holders to emigrate, the Catholics, who took their places, assumed those rights in the soil which user had attached to the Ulster holdings. These customary rights established sufficient binding force to regulate the dealings of the tenants inter se, and also the relations of landlord and tenant, without the assistance of the Legislature, indeed actually in spite of it ; while once established they obtained a certain hold upon the minds of the landlords, who in many cases became pronouncedly in their favour. At first sight this is somewhat curious, since the usage trenches deeply on the legal privileges of the landlord^; but on ex- amination the reason of the change of sentiment is plain. The landlord's claim for arrears was a first charge upon the sum obtained by the outgoing tenant, and the rent reserved, if lower than a competitive rent, yet possessed a greater degree of certainty. The power of refusing consent to the introduction of a new tenant upon reasonable grounds, also influenced the land- lord in favour of the custom; as did the fact of his having a voice in the regulation of the price paid for the tenant-right, which enabled him to prevent the holding being taken at a cost likely to cripple the new tenant, and to make him an unsatis- factory substitute, unable to improve the holding or to pay rent. There were, however, unsatisfactory features in the custom. The interest for which the incoming tenant might have paid as much as twenty years' purchase was not in reality a stable one, but was legally at the will of the landlord. Even if the strength of the usage granted a certain security of tenure the custom did not itself attempt to define what was to be held a fair rent — obviously a matter of opinion — nor did it itself provide for the increase of rent natural on any advance in the value of the land I These uncertainties in the custom led to a slight 1 The Devon Commissioners held ^ uj;fQ principles for the calculation that the tenant-right was an undue of this fair rent were ever so generally interference with the rights of the received as to become part of the cus- landlords, see Digest, p. 290. tom. It was conceded that the land- 122 tTLSTER TENANT-HIGH!* [CHAP. amount of friction even in Ulster, though the position there was removed wide as the poles from the universal bad feeling and thinly veiled revolt of the rest of Ireland ; where though tenant-right existed locally, bearing certain similarities to the northern custom, it was very limited in its extent and uncertain in its operation. A feature in the custom which developed a certain soreness of feeling on the part of the tenants was the fact that when the land decreased in value the loss fell upon the tenant-right, which became valueless when there were no purchasers, or when even the small amount realized was claimed by the landlord for arrears accumulated during the bad seasons. When the value of land dropped so rapidly in 1848, relations were nearly as strained in parts of Ulster as in the south. In 1850 the ** Irish Tenant-right League" was founded, aiming at acquiring legal recognition for a universal tenant- interest resembling that which obtained in Ulster. At first the Protestants of the north and the Catholics of the south made common cause ; but religious differences soon separated them, and the agitation did not assume any formidable pro- portions. There are many reasons why the introduction of the Ulster custom throughout Ireland by means of compulsory legislation would not be a success \ As has been shown it is not sufficiently elaborated to fit any relation of landlord and tenant where at least the germ of sympathy does not exist; for while favourable to the tenant in times of prosperity, his apparent liability to, and the seeming exemption of the land- lord from, loss when land is depreciated in value, strains their relations to one another. In the case of Ulster too the extraneous means of acquiring wealth, independent of the soil, by manufacturing pursuits provides a more or less constant supply of purchasers for the land when it comes into the lord might raise the rent from time to tenant-right, or to absorb the profits time, as the general progress of the due to improvements made by the country and the condition of agricul- tenant," Field, p. 288. tural profits justified, but it was i See post, p. 139, 141, as to effect asserted he had no right to raise it to of recognition of custom by act of such an extent as to destroy the Parliament. VIII.] AND THE DEVON COMMISSION. 123 market; while in other parts of Ireland the complete depen- dence of the population upon agriculture, though increasing the demand for land, restricts the possibility of there being the necessary capital for its purchase in times of depression. Hence the tenant-right would either become merely of nominal value, or else the incoming tenant would take the holding burdened by a load of debt accumulated in raising the purchase money of the tenant-right, and so would be in no position either to do justice to the land, or to give much likelihood of being a satisfactory rent-payer \ 1 The tenant too frequently plunged And see Cobden Essay by Kt Hon. into a sea of financial troubles by M. Longfield. raising money on his tenant-right. CHAPTER IX. Free Trade in Land. The years following 1848 brought many social changes in Ireland, but it is unquestionable that the surface prosperity of the land increased in no ordinary degree. Middlemen had practically disappeared, and absenteeism was greatly diminished. The rise in the prices of agricultural products swelled the wealth of a country where farming was almost the only widely culti- vated pursuit ; and, despite the fact that the productive land devoted to tillage diminished by 140,000 acres between 1855 and 1868 \ the bank deposits of the peasants increased to very considerable sums^. A veil of apparent well-being was drawn over the rents and chasms of the social system, and during these years many thought the Irish question solved. It needed but the touch of adversity, however, to bring out in relief all the discords of the conflicting claims of owner and occupier. The new landlords who had purchased under the Incumbered Estates' Act^ had certainly improved the productive powers of the land, but the insecurity of the tenant-interest was still an unsolved problem ; nay more, the complexity of the cross claims was accentuated, for the business character of their investment in Irish land made the landlords not unnaturally tenacious of their full powers. In 1860* an Act was passed so calculated to re-open every half-healed wound in the union of the two land classes that it is almost a matter of amazement that it should have been expected by many who had studied the subject, to prove 1 Field, p. 291 (Note). » 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48. See ante p. 111. a Ibid. p. 292. ^ 2'6 & 2i Vict. c. 154. CHAP. TX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 125 the Beus ex machind of the land question. The principle of the Act was simplicity itself, it was merely free trade in land. That such an idea as that of placing landed relations upon the same basis as mercantile transactions should have commended itself to the speculative purchaser through the Incumbered Estates' Court is natural enough ; he desired no- thing better than that untrammelled contractual relationships should be regarded as the foundation of his position ; it freed him from all obligations, save those of a fair mercantile con- nection, to his tenants. But that the principle should have commended itself to the uninterested observer is more re- markable. The vital change in the system of land ownership created by this Act has been little appreciated ; yet the whole feudal theory of real property crumbled into dust before it, and tenure ceased to exist. By one enactment of the Legis- lature the reciprocal rights of landlord and tenant^ were shifted from the basis of status to that of contract. The number of purchasers under the Incumbered Estates' Act was very large; within eight years of its passing, 3,197 properties were sold, and bought by no less than 7,216 purchasers^ ; the landlord interest exerted in favour of the Act of 1860 would therefore be considerable. The hold that the theories of political economy had gained at this time was probably the explanation of its commending itself to unin- terested persons. Free trade was the key to every difficulty. To place landlord and tenant on the equal platform of con- tractual rights; to enable the landowner to sell or let his land as he could sell or let his horses, and to make the tenant purchase or hire his holding as he might a cart, was looked upon as the plain solution of the whole land question. It was never realized that a rule which may be obvious equity in one society may work wrong in another. It is apparent that to the Irish tenant, who considered that he had vested interests in the soil, the contractual theory would be perfectly incomprehensible. According to the tenant's view if A purchased the estate of 1 The very word tenant, though tions established by this Act. used here, is inapplicable to the rela- 2 Qf whom 314 only were English. 126 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. B, he did so subject to all the (assumed) rights of B's tenants to the continued possession of their holdings on payment of rent ; but under this Act no such theory would hold for a moment. A becomes owner of the estate : at the end of the current year* of their tenancy, the mass of holdings are legally terminated ; A feels no bond uniting him to the tenants, and though he may continue their possession in their holdings it is on a totally different footing. The relation established between A and C (an old tenant) is in ^'s estimation simply this — "1 (^) have contracted with you (C) to give you quiet posses- sion of a certain holding for a payment of £ — for the period of one year." Now C on the other hand imagined the relation established to be a mere continuation of the practically perpetual interest which he considered he had held in the soil when his rent had to be paid to B, changed only in so far that the said rent had now to be paid to ^. There was, however, a more serious objection to the Act of 1860 than the conflicting views of landlord and tenant, an objec- tion which proved destructive to the whole theory on which the Act was based. When contractual relations are established if the respective rights of the contracting parties are to be satis- factorily settled both parties should act with freedom. The binding agreement which is to limit and define their mutual obligations should not be rendered unjust by the compulsion of circumstance operating against one party and not against the other. The demand for land was largely in advance of the supply, its possession being almost an essential of existence to the tenant. Devoid of capital, and unskilled in any art save the rudest cultivation of the soil, the Irish small holder felt himself bound to get the land at any cost. What freedom of contract could under such circumstances exist between the land- lord and tenant ? The rent to be rendered for the subject-matter of their contract was fixed not by the consent of both parties but by the obligatory acceptance by the tenant of the landlord's terms. A notice to quit did not convey to the tenant that he 1 It has been explained before that almost all the holdings were from year to year. IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 127 must either make a new agreement with the landlord — should he think fit — upon different terms, or else take another holding elsewhere ; it said, " you are without capital, there is no land to be got elsewhere, you must agree to whatever your landlord proposes, or you must leave a cherished home and be cast with- out resource upon the world." Freedom of contract was scarcely possible in such a case as this. The notice to quit was used by the new landlords in a purely mercantile manner; they assumed the right given them by statute to sell their goods in the best market; the notice to quit produced invariably an acceptance of the higher rental demanded, and they did not consider it their business to look beneath the surface for causes when the effect seemed so satisfactory. Having raised by such means the nominal rent roll of his estate, the speculative purchaser frequently sold it at the increased value suggested by its nominal incoming, and the new owner ^ naturally extorted the full amount of the rents on the strength of which he had bought the estate. So sweeping was the change introduced by the Landlord and Tenant Law Amendment Act (Ireland) 1860^ that it merits great attention I By sec. 3 it is enacted that "the relation of landlord and tenant shall be deemed to be founded on the express or implied contract of the parties and not upon tenure or service, and a reversion shall not be necessary to such relation, which shall be deemed to subsist in all cases in which there shall be an agreement by one party to hold land from or under another in consideration of any rent." In so short a section is swept away all the law of feudal landed relations, and half a dozen words suffice to extinguish the necessity of a reversion which was the keystone of the system. The func- tions of the law, moreover, are changed by this substitution 1 See Eichey, p. 59. and the remarkable contrast between 3 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154. the complete negation of tenant-right * It was stated by the Bessborough in the Act of 1860 and the practical Commission that this Act of 1860 creation, if not recognition, of it by the produced but little effect, but an Acts of 1870 & 1881. To the influence examination of the Act will show the of the Act of 1860 in showing vividly complete revolution made in the the difficulties of the land problem nature of laud holding in Ireland the later Acts are largely due. 128 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. of a basis of contract instead of status for the reciprocal rights of landlord and tenant. The law is no longer employed in defining the relative positions of the two classes, but merely in enforcing by its sanctions the agreements made between them\ Another inroad on the old established rules regulating the rights and liabilities created by a transfer of land is found in sections 12 and 13 ^ the first of which transfers to the assignee of the landlord the benefit or liability which would have accrued to the original landlord on his covenants and agreement, while the latter, in similar manner, allows the transfer of the benefit and liabilities of the covenants and agreements of the original tenant to his assignee ^ Here the contractual theory is seen in full force ; unfettered by the old rules of covenants which did or did not run with the land, the assignee either of landlord or tenant merely steps into the shoes of one of the original parties to the contract. In one instance an omission in the Act is remarkable. In the past so great troubles had been caused by the non-recognition of the right of the tenant to compensation for his permanent im- provements, that it is curious that this Act, which so vastly facilitated the transfer of land, did not deal fully with this question. The claim of a tenant whose term is closed by the voluntary action of the landlord to compensation for improve- ments is even recognised by the Brehon Law. " If the land has been let for hire, and no time has been specified, whatever length of time he shall be upon it, whether with necessity or without necessity he goes, he shall leave behind the erections. If he be noticed {to quit), whether it is with or without necessity, he may carry away his erections with him. If a term has been specified for him, and the term has expired, he shall leave his erections (behindy." It is of course plain that under the con- tractual theory a tenant would have no inherent right to claim 1 Irish Land Laws, A. G. Richey, had given notice in writing to the p, 8. landlord of the particulars of the 2 These sections together with sec. assignment. 14, repealed 11 Anne c. 2, s. 6. •* Ancient laws of Ireland, Vol. iv., 3 But the original tenant was not pp. 132 and 183, quoted by Richey. discharged from his liability unless he IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 129 for his improvements at the termination of his contract as they were vokmtary, he being only required by his agreement to leave the land as he got it. It is to be regretted, therefore, that an attempt was not made to set the vexed subject at rest by specific enactment. The absence of any provision for this purpose is the more noticeable as the law of removable fix- tures^ received an important extension by the Act of 1860, by which not only were trade and agricultural fixtures allowed to be taken by the tenant (as under the Act of 1851'^), when erected with consent and removed during the tenancy, but in addition permission was given to remove them after the termi- nation of the holding, and although they had been erected without leave. This privilege was given by section 17, which allowed " personal chattels, engines, and machinery, and build- ings accessorial thereto, erected and affixed to the freehold by the tenant at his sole expense, for any purposes of trade, manufacture, or agriculture, or for ornament, or for the do- mestic convenience of the tenant in his occupation of the demised premises, and so attached to the freehold that they can be removed without substantial damage to the freehold or to the fixture itself" to be removed, provided that they had not been erected under any obligation or contrary to any agreement. Such removal to be effected by the tenant, or his executors or administrators either (1) during the tenancy, or (2) within two calendar months after its determination^ (when the tenancy determines by some uncertain event, and without the act or default of the tenant). This provision certainly bettered the position of the tenant as regards movable fixtures, but no effort was made to deal with the question of permanent improvements. The dwelling, such as it was, on the holding had almost always been erected either by the tenant or some ancestor of his, but no compensation could be obtained for it ; and the fact that in general all the permanent improvements were, unlike the ^ Dr Richey pointed out that much Roman law. SeeBracton,l.l,c. 1, s. 4, of the rigid and inequitable character and Richey, p. 45. of the English law on this' subject was ^ 14 & 15 Vict. c. 25, s. 3. caused by the incomplete manner in ^ Unless it is otherwise provided by which Bracton adopted the rules of the the contract of tenancy. M. 9 130 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. English custom, provided by the tenant, made a rule which worked fairly in England, burdensome in Ireland. Before leaving this subject it should be noticed that by another Act of 1860 called the Tenure and Improvement of Land (Ireland) Act^ a hesitating attempt had been made to deal with the question. The third part of this Act, which treats of improvements made by agricultural tenants in their holdings, provides for their compensation for those of a certain class (such as reclaiming land or erecting farm build- ings) by an annuity charged on the lands in which they have been made^ the labour of the tenant to be reckoned in the compensation I The right of compensation thus given, how- ever, was only exercisable when the improvements had been made with the consent of the landlord*, and when they could not have been exacted by the owner in pursuance of any con- tract or custom ^ The Act, though doubtless a step in the right direction, did not touch the heart of the difficulty, as it merely affected prospective improvements®. Returning to the consideration of 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, it is plain, that being based on the contractual theory, it would differ in its way of viewing the subject-matter of the contract from the English Common Law rule. Accordingly section 40 enacted that if any dwelling-house or other building constituting the substantial matter of the demise, was held by the tenant without an express covenant by him to repair, and was destroyed, became ruinous and uninhabitable, or incapable of beneficial occupation or enjoyment without fault of the tenant, he had a right to determine the tenancy by surrender. The English Common Law rule in such a case, despite the destruc- tion of the subject of the lease, would have held the tenant liable for the rent during the term. 1 23 & 24 Vict. c. 153. interfere with any established customs 2 Ibid. sec. 36, and any other lands as to compensation &c., see sec. 62. lying adjacent to such, and held of ^ A defence of the limited character the same owner under the same de- of this measure, and a good sketch of mise. its general character, will be found in * Ibid. sec. 44. the speech made by Mr Cardwell when 4 Ibid. sec. 39 and 40. introducing the Bill. See Hansard's ^ Sec. 36. This Act did not seek to 3rd series, vol. clvii. p. 1553 — 1566. IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 131 It has been seen ^ that the process of distress as a means of obtaining rent had declined. The Act of 1860 of course swept away the whole theory on which the right of feudal distress was built up, namely, the entry of the lord to compel per- formance of the feudal services. It did not, however, abolish this remedy for non-payment, but by section 51^ limited its action to the recovery of one year's rent. The effect of this section was to throw into more than usual prominence the remedy of ejectment, which had for some time been gradually more and more resorted to by the landlords. When the much-abused right of ejectment is first met with in the history of Irish land law its exercise was limited to cases where there was (1) a lease, and (2) such lease contained a proviso for re-entry. In 1781^ the power was extended to those cases in which there was some lease, minute, or contract in writ- ing, provided a whole year's rent or more was in arrear, though there was no actual clause of re-entry. An Act of the present reign* further extended the right to bring an ejectment to the case of tenancies where no written agreement existed, provided the annual rent of the holding was under £50 and a year's rent in arrear. Finally, the Act of 1860^ allowed ejectments when a year's rent was in arrear® although the tenancy was only implied without a written agreement, and whatever the annual rent: while all the cumbrous legal restrictions as to who had a right to take proceedings against the tenant, which had sprung 1 Ante, page 99. Bills (Ireland) Act. 2 "From and after the commence- ^ 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, sec. 52. ment of this Act it shall not be lawful ^ When rent was less than £100, for any landlord, or anyone on his proceedings might be taken in County behalf, to take or seize any distress for Court, see sec. 52 (23 & 24 Vict. c. rent which became due more than one 154), and Richey p. 54. Two other year before the making of such dis- Acts bearing on ejectment are, one tress." 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, sec. 51. passed in the reign of Anne, and the 3 By 5 Geo. II. c. 4 s. 1 (Irish), and Eviction Act, 1816 (56 Geo. III. c. 88), again (in 1751) by 25 Geo. 11. c. 18, providing the remedy by civil bill sec. 2 (Irish), which extended the process — a very important change in power to cases where there was an the law, as it greatly simplified and article, minute, or contract in writing cheapened the proceedings. It must without either (1) an actual demise, be remembered that this Act was passed or (2) a clause of re-entry. when the power of the landlords was 4 14 & 15 Vict. c. 57, sec. 73, Civil at its height. See ante, p. 106. 9—2 132 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. up from the rules of the right to rent running with the rever- sion, were abolished S section 53 enacting that, "in any eject- ment under this Act it shall not be necessary to allege or prove the making of any demand or re-entry, or the existence of any clause or condition of re-entry in the lease or other contract, or of any legal reversion expectant on the determination of the same, and subsisting in the landlord, provided a tenancy be- tween the parties shall appear to exist, whether by original contract, or by lawful assignment, devise, bequest, or act and operation of law^" The advocates of free trade believed that in 1860 an ab- solutely fair land system had been established in Ireland; but the Act, though theoretically perfectly just, being founded on pure contract, was unsuited to the state of society to which it was applied. From the very nature of the social system in Ireland free contract could not exist, and after a short time, despite the surface prosperity of the country, signs of disturb- ance began to appear. Notices to quit began to be largely served on the tenants, and where they escaped eviction it was only by consenting to a higher rate of rent. A large number of evictions of small holders took place in order to enable the landlords to consolidate their estates into larger farms, and between 1861 and 1880 there was a decline of no less than 809,312 in the number of acres under crops, amounting to more than one-seventh of the total acreage under tillage in 18611 The notices to quit, even where no extreme measures were taken, produced an unfortunate result; they marked to the mind of the tenant the uncertainty of his holding, and so were a perpetual cause at once of alarm and anger^ An increase in the tenant agitations began to show, and, although it was not openly admitted, those in authority began to perceive that 1 See The Irish Land Laws, A. G. ^ In the majority of cases, however, Richey, pp. 41 — 44. the relations of landlord and tenant 2 See post, p. 180, as to changes in were not substantially altered. The the law of eviction under Act of 1887. worst effects of the Act lay in the way 3 These figures are important, as in in which it unsettled all existing ar- Ireland there is always a direct rela- rangements and thus aggravated the tion between the enlargement of farms class feeling in the country. and the increase of pasture lauds. IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 13B the Act of 1860 had been a failure, indeed had gone further than that, and proved a new disturbing element. The principle of the Act was of course just; pure contractual rights with regard to a commodity must of necessity be fair if both parties act freely. In the case of Irish land, however, not only was freedom of contract absent, but also, while the Act of 1860 adopted the theory that the landlord as absolute owner offered for sale or hire a commodity in which the occu- pier had no vested interest, the tenant held that the land was at least in part his property, and believed in the existence of such interest on the ground (1) of his improvements, and (2) of the assumed practical perpetuity of his tenure. It is evident that here a system of contract, suitable only to an advanced and equably constituted society, and even then suitable only to dealings in a commodity which is amenable to the fair laws of demand and supply, was planted upon a com- munity the social organization of which combined every element of disorder and disintegration. Moreover, the system of contract applied was one of strict mercantile relations, and untempered by concurrent equities. The late Dr Richey, who instituted a comparison at some length between the contractual theory applied to the Irish land law and the theories of the French civilians, as shown chiefly by Pothier's " Traite du Contrat de Bail a Rente" and the French Code, showed very clearly how the mercantile aspect of contract adopted by the Act of 1860 affected the relation of landlord and tenant. Dealing with the manner in which the Civil Law treats the relation of landlord and tenant, which it also bases upon the theory that tenancy is a species of hiring, he pointed out that the difference noticeable between it and the English law was caused by the divergent views which the Roman and English lawyers held as to the origi- nal nature of the contract itself, namely: — "(1) The former con- sidered a letting of land for a term to be a quasi-sale, with an equitable warranty that the land was worth the annual rent ; the latter that it was a mercantile transaction subject to the rule of * caveat emptor' (2) The former considered the rent as the owner's share in the proceeds of the farm, and therefore gave to the landlord the right of hypothec, and compelled him to share 134 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. IX. in the loss occasioned by a deficient harvest ; the latter held the rent as something collateral to the letting — cotemporary but not conditional : the tenant made his bargain, and, as in every other mercantile transaction, ran the chance of gain or loss. (3) The former considered the several agreements of the tenant, whether expressed or implied, as conditions precedent of his possession, and held, therefore, that the landlord could bring his action to re-enter upon the breach of any agreement, expressed or implied ; the latter, considering all such agreements (except that for the payment of rent) as collateral, gave the landlord no right to re-enter, and left him to his personal action for damages in all except the one excepted case\" That the basis of mercantile contract was unsuited to the case of the Irish land system is clear, but when the fact was at length realized it was found necessary to proceed with the utmost caution with regard to remedial measures. It might be obvious to those who looked beneath the surface that the creation of pure contractual relations, unfettered by equitable obligations, had been a grave error, but enormous interests were concerned under the change which had been adopted. The purchasers under the Incumbered Estates' Act 1848, and the Landed Estates' Act 1858, had always expected freedom of transfer to be attached to their purchases ; the Act of 1860 seemed to them the essence of justice, and it was impossible to blink the fact that they had invested their money on the strength of a State guarantee. Again, had it been openly de- clared that the principle of the Act of 1860 was wrong, the chamjoions of free trade would at once have cried down so heterodox a notion ; for though it was clear that the Act was not working well, it was far from being recognized by the majority of people that rules of abstract fairness may operate oppressively in particular circumstances. When the need for new legislation therefore became imperative, the framers of the Act of 1870 approached the subject with great caution. ^ The Irish Land Laivs, pp. 55, 56. CHAPTER X. The Act of 1870. The Act of 1860 failed, and agrarian outrages followed the feeling of insecurity of tenure which had been fostered. The general situation also was but little affected by the dis- establishment and disendowment of the Irish Church by 32 & 33 Vict. c. 42, though it is impossible to pass over this Act, as in one very important feature it proved efficacious in dealing with the land. Its provisions as to sales by the Church Com- missioners \ unlike the clauses of the Acts of 1870 and 1881 dealing with purchase, proved largely successfuP. This was the more remarkable, since although the amount which might be advanced by the Commissioners — or rather might be credited by them to the purchaser on mortgage — exceeded that which the Land Commissioners were empowered by the Act of 1870 to advance, still the rate of interest to be charged (4 per cent.) was practically higher I In 1870 it was universally admitted that further legis- lation was a necessity ; and on the 15th of February Mr Gladstone moved for leave to bring in a Bill to amend the 1 Occupying tenants were protected missioners were transferred in 1881 to by a right of pre-emption being given the Irish Land Commission, to the tenant. See sec. 34, sub-s. (1) ^ The full amount of purchase- and (5) : money being £1,674,000. The com- " The ordinary tenants of the Church parative number of purchasers under numbered 8432, and of these up to this Act and under the Acts of 1870, November 1st, 1880, 6057 had become 1881, and 1885 will be given when owners of their holdings at an average dealing with Lord Ashbourne's Act. price of 22| years' purchase." Tico See post, p. 176. Centuries of Irish History, article by ^ See post, p. 153, note, and Keport G. Macdonell. The powers of the Com- of Bessborough Commission, sec. 87. 136 THE ACT OF 18*70. [CHAP. law relating to the occupation and ownership of land in Ireland as regarded agricultural* or pastoral holdings. He admitted that it was but a tardy measure ; that, following as it did in many ways the lines suggested by the "Report of the Devon Commission, its efficacy would have been probably greater, and its action certainly more beneficial, had it been introduced some twenty years before ^ ; and then in a speech of much power urged the acceptance of a Bill drawn upon similar lines to, but in bolder fashion than, the Commissioners' report^. The objects aimed at were threefold, (1) to give some security of tenure to the tenant by making it a matter of expense and trouble for the landlord to exact his full legal rights; (2) to settle the question of improvements by acknowledging the tenant's claim to compensation ; and (3) to facilitate the estab- lishment of peasant owners by means of certain provisions for purchase known as the ' Bright Clauses.' It is apparent at once that the legislation of this Act is in a manner retrograde, for by the Act of 1860 absolute free trade in land had been established, while the restrictions now suggested were a limitation of the right of free contract, and amounted to a creation on the part of the Legislature of a tenant- 1 The provisions for compensation of pasture lands as a source of loss to did not touch demesne lands, holdings the lower classes he said, " Between in virtue of being a hired labourer, 1860 and 1868 the pasturage of Ireland lettings in conacre, or holdings stated has increased by about 560,0C0 acres, in writing to be for a temporary pur- and the tillage of Ireland has decreased pose, or cottage allotments not exceed- during that period about 400,000 acres, ing a quarter of an acre (33 & 34 Vict. We are given to understand that, inas- c. 46, sec. 15), and the Act only ap- much as meadow land is reckoned under plied to holdings agricultural or pas- land in tillage, and has considerably toral (sec. 71). increased, the real decrease of tillage 2 See Hansard, 3rd series, vol. cxcix. land is greater still." Again, dealing p. 334. "Had these recommendations with the Poor Law statistics he stated (i. e. those of the Devon Commis- that down to 1860 there had been a sioners) been acted upon at the time, decrease in the pressure on the poor it is probable that at this moment no rates, and "in that year the number Irish land question would be before of persons seeking relief, who in 1849 the House for discussion." — Mr Glad- might have been counted, so to speak, stone. by millions, was 170,000 ; but in 1868 ' Various figures were quoted by Mr the number had increased to 289,000." Gladstone to show the need of further See Hansard, 3rd series, vol. cxcix, pp. legislation. Alluding to the increase 341, 342. X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 137 interest in the land. The claims of the tenants are, it is true, never definitely stated throughout the Act, nor indeed would it have been easily possible for the Government to fully state them. The English belief in the absolute character of freehold ownership had never permitted an open acknowledge- ment of a right, on the part of the Irish tenant from year to year, to any possessory interest in his holding save the yearly tenancy. While in addition since 1860 the absolute property in the land, subject only to existing tenancies, had been recog- nized as residing in the landlords. The purchasers in the Incumbered Estates' Court of lands held by tenants from year to year had been formally released by the Act of 1860 from any obligation to their tenantry (after the termination of the year current at the time of their pur- chase), other than resulted from a contractual letting and hiring. Neverthless, although it was effected merely in a nega- tive manner, further rights of the tenants in the soil were clearly recognized in 1870. The principle of the Act, by which security of tenure was intended to be conferred, was that of making the landlord pay a compensation for disturbance to the tenant against whom he thought fit to exercise his undeniable legal right of eviction. Since, therefore, the landlord was unable to exercise his rights without compensating the tenant, it is evident that the latter practically acquired an interest in the land equal in value to the amount of such compensation *. The tenant in fact had his rights increased to the same extent that the landlord's powers were diminished. The right of the tenant to compensation for disturbance, however, did not exist if he held for a term certain exceed- ing 31 years ; and ejectments for non-payment of rent, or for breach of any conditions against assignment, subletting, bank- ruptcy, or insolvency were not deemed disturbances within the meaning of the Act^. The cause of the 31 years' limit was an endeavour to stimulate the granting of leases for this length of ^ Dr Eiohey well pointed out that was to make eviction a privilege of the whereas it was urged that this provi- wealthy. Irish Land Laivs, p. 64. sion merely compelled bad landlords ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, s. 9. to act like good ones, its real effect 138 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. time; and the compensation allowed for disturbance in other cases was based on the theory that it was the voluntary act of the landlord, for which damages were due to the tenant, who had not by his conduct conduced to such termination. Now, granting for the moment that such a compensation was equit- able in the case of tenants from year to year, it is hard to see upon what possible grounds it could be supported in the case of a tenancy for a term certain less than 31 years which deter- mined by effluxion of time. It cannot be urged that this is in any sense determination by the act of the landlord, and why then should he be liable to compensate the tenant ? As a general fault in the whole Act it must be urged that its intricacy was eminently unsuited to grapple successfully with a popular evil ; its subtlety rendering it unintelligible to the greater portion of the class who were intended to benefit by it, and the necessary invocation of a court of justice before its benefits could be received both conflicting with the pre- judices of the tenants, and causing expense to bar some claims. There are other and more serious objections, however, which it is well to glance at before the Act is examined in detail. Chief amongst these stands the fact that it did not openly touch the root of the peasants' grievance, money for his im- provements doubtless seemed to him a boon, and compensation for disturbance was good in his eyes, but it was for neither of these things that he was striving ; what he desired was to be able always to stay in his holding. Compensation was a plea- sant idea certainly, but then it was only gained when all he desired was lost, namely, when he was forced from his home. Moreover, when he had the money it was wonderfully useless to him ; for as was pointed out by the late Dr Eichey^ he knew but two uses for it, either he must stock a farm (and the number of farms was limited while the demand was excessive), or he must place it in a bank on deposit receipt. Again the compensation, the payment of which was to deter the landlord from an arbitrary exercise of his powers, was frequently ad- vanced by the incoming tenant^, necessity driving the tenants 1 p. 94. 2 Bicliey, p. 96. X.] THE ACT OF 1870. ISO to overwhelm one another in their frantic struggles to obtain the possession of land. Further, the idea that leases for 31 years would prove to be objects of desire to the tenants was not justified in the event; and for this there were two principal reasons : (1) the tenant from year to year regarded his holding as a species of perpetuity* (and the effect of the Act of 1870 was certainly to strengthen him in this impression) therefore he regarded a lease for a term certain as constituting a waiver by him of his rights in the soil and an unjust limitation of them : (2) on the termination of a tenancy for more than 31 years no claim could be made by the tenant for compensation for dis- turbance, whereas such a right was given by the Act of 1870 in the case of a yearly tenancy if determined by the act of the landlord. In addition to these faults in the Act it should be noticed that it contained no provision regulating in any way the rate of fair rent, and even when it recognised the existence of, and for the first time gave the formal sanction of the Legislature to the Ulster custom, it took no steps to remedy its weak point of uncertainty as to what constituted a fair rent. The result of the Act was in no way what had been so confidently hoped and expected ; its general tendency indeed proved merely to be to increase the amount of rent asked for the peasant holdings ^ Nevertheless, though it proved abortive, as far as the final solu- tion of the Irish land troubles were concerned, it is a most ingenious fabric, and while an examination in detail brings out many unexpected flaws in its construction, it will always remain a most important landmark in the history of Irish law. It is a remarkable example of the dexterous handling which Mr Glad- stone so invariably applies to his legislative creations. Unfor- tunately it proved rather the fruitful mother of other troubles than the final settlement of the question dealt with. The Act of 1870^ after having been vigorously opposed in 1 " It is not the right of the rent- Committee, receiver, but the right of the cultiva- ^ 33 ^jr 34 yjct^ q 45^ entitled " An tor, with whom the idea of property is Act to amend the law relating to the connected in the Irish mind." England occupation and ownership of land in and Ireland, J. S. Mill. Ireland." ^ See § 19 Eeport of Bessborough 140 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. Committee in both Houses of Parliament, became law on the 1st of August of that year^ and has been rightly described as one of the most remarkable and original pieces of legislation in the Statute Book. It is divided into five parts, dealing respec- tively with (1) the law of compensation to tenants^ (2) the sale of land to tenants ^ (3) advances by, and powers of, the Board of Works*, (4) and (5) supplemental and miscellaneous provisions^. Taking the most important clauses in detail, the first section of the Act deals with the question of the Ulster tenant-right. No alteration or limitation is suggested, it is simply enacted that the custom shall receive the sanction of law, and be capable of regular legal enforcement when proved to exist. It has already been pointed out® that this Ulster custom, though widely preferable to entire insecurity of tenure, was deficient through its lack of sufficiently defining incidents of the custom, such as fair rent, which were nevertheless essential to its existence. The recognition by Legislature of the custom enhanced these weak points. The usual plan of employing local valuators to estimate the worth of the holding for the pur- pose of fixing the fair rent, when a readjustment was necessary, was unsuitable to a legalized system, and the action of the Courts failed to uphold the most useful feature of the usage, viz. continuity of tenure. In short, the action of the Courts when applied to the Ulster customs deprived them at once of the flexibility to circumstance which was their chief boon. The Ulster customs differed entirely from * customs of the country ' in the sense in which it is usual to employ the words as indicating a usage which must have been deemed to have been in the contemplation of both parties when they made their contract, and which hence can rightly be held an implied term thereof. As was pointed out by the late Dr Richey, such a custom as that by which a tenant was entitled to a way-going crop, etc., is one which a landlord, when creating a yearly tenancy, may be held to have contemplated; "but a 1 About a fortnight after the break- ^ Sees. 42 to 56. ing out of the Franco-German war. ^ Pt. 4, sees. 57 to 64 ; pt. 5, sees, 2 Sees. 1 to 31. 65 to 73. 3 Sees. 32 to 41. p Ante, p. 121, 122. X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 141 custom, such as that of Ulster, to pay to the tenant the value of his occupancy upon the legal determination of his tenancy, was oneTcontradictory to the nature of the estate created, and excluded by the terms of the contract itself" ^ It was therefore unjust to have expected the formal recognition of the custom from the Irish Courts before 1870, and its working in the form perforce assumed under the Act, both deprived it of many of its in- herent advantages, and also showed that legal forms did not suit the usage. What was really required by the tenant under the Ulster custom, who applied to the Court for help on account of receiving from his landlord a notice to pay higher rent or quit his holding, was not a judgment against the landlord for the amount of his tenant-right, but a decree for the specific per- formance of the customary compact of continued holding at a fair rent*^. The Court, however, did not deal with the settlement of fair rents, and the tenant's demand took the form of a claim for compensation', with the result that neither landlord nor tenant in all probability got what they required. The landlord was first compelled to pay a considerable sum, and then had the land thrown upon his hands, when all he. desired was to raise the rent of the holding, possibly on account of an increase in the value of the land ; and the tenant was presented with a sum of money which he did not want, and for which he had little use, while he was deprived of the holding to which he was so deeply attached. Nor did the Act prevent the raising of rent, for if the landlord, when the Cenant-right was in the market, stated that in future the rent would be increased, this did not usually deter the purchaser, and the loss of value in the tenant-right fell upon the outgoing tenant who received a less sum for the goodwill of his holding*. The exact position taken by the Act of 1870 with regard to the Ulster customs was not in any way to render them obli- gatory on the tenant should he choose to waive them and claim under the general rights given, but merely to offer a legal 1 Irish Land Laws, p. 102. Dr ^ g^e Eeport of Bessborough Com- Kichey refers in support of this view mittee, 17, 18. to the exhaustive judgment in Ramsden ^ See Field, p. 312. V. Dyson, L. R. 1. H. of L. 129. ^ juid, p. 314. 142 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. sanction for their incidents if the tenant chose to demand it and could prove the custom. The usage might, and generally did, vary in different parts of Ulster (indeed even contiguous estates might differ in minor points), but the tenant was merely required to prove the particular customs, and that they had prevailed for a reasonable time, and had not been created in contemplation of the Act\ Leaving the subject of holdings regulated by custom,^ the Act then proceeds to lay down the rules under which com- pensation for disturbance in the absence of usage is to be computed. As has been said, the whole principle involved in allowing such a claim, which was tantamount to the vesting of a right in the land in the tenant, independent of his contract with the landlord, was foreign to the theory of the Act of 1860. The use of the term 'compensation for disturbance' also was singularly unfortunate, as, even if it applied to the case of a yearly tenancy, it is absolutely contrary to common sense when applied to the claim against the landlord of a tenant who held for a term certain which ended by completion of the term^ When Mr Gladstone described the nature of the compen- sation clauses in the Act^ he prefaced his remarks by giving a comparison of the rent returns of the past century in Ireland, England and Scotland, showing that while in the first case they had only about doubled, in England they had trebled, and in Scotland sextupled. He argued, therefore, as a proof of the advantages of security of tenure to the tenant, that the rents had increased in the three countries in the direct ratio of the security of the tenure of the cultivator*. He then carried the same argument further by shewing that the increase in Ulster had been larger than in the rest of Ireland owing to the increased rights of the tenant under the Ulster custom, and the consequent restriction of the powers of the landlord ^ The form which compensation for disturbance 1 See Kevan v. Lord de Eos, quoted in the Bill, February 15th, 1870. by Richey, p. 106. ^ See Hansard, 3rd series, Vol. 2 See ante, p. 138, and Richey, p. 66 cxcix. p. 355, 356. (note). ^ Mr Gladstone gave the following ' When moving for leave to bring figures for Ireland — not including X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 143 in the absence of custom ultimately assumed when embodied in the Act of 1870\ presents on analysis the following features: — A. The tenant is only entitled to compensation under the general clauses when: — (By section 3,) 1. He is not entitled to claim under the Ulster or similar customs : or 2. Being so entitled elects not to claim under them. 3. Is disturbed by the act of the landlord: — While for the purposes of the Act the following are not deemed disturbances by the landlord of such a kind as to entitle the tenant to compensation : — (By section 9,) (1) An ejectment for non-payment of rent. (2) An ejectment for breach of any conditions against assignment, subletting, bankruptcy or insolvency. Provided that the Court may, if it think fit, hold an ejectment for non-payment of rent to be a disturbance in the case of a tenancy existing at the time of the passing of the Act, and con- tinuing to exist without alteration of rent up to the time of such determination, if a. rent arrears did not accrue within the last three years, and if any earlier arrears re- mained due from the tenant at the time of commencing the ejectment: — or 6. the rent of the holding is under £15 per annum and the Court certifies that the rent is ex- orbitant ^ Ulster : Rentals in 1779 (according to series, Vol. cxcix. p. 357. Arthur Young), £5,000,000, in 1869 ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46. £9,200,000, i.e. less than double. ^ This provision turned out almost While in Ulster during the same inoperative, and was for the most part period the increase was more than unnoticed, the use of the word ' exor- threefold, though the soil was far bitant ' contributing to this result, less productive. See Hansard, 3rd Bessborough Commission, § 21. 144 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. (By section 10,) (3) The resumption by the landlord from a yearly tenant of not more than ^sth. of his holding for the purpose of erecting labourers' cottages thereon, and which was resumed after six months' notice to the tenant, unless the Court shall hold such resumption unreasonable. (By section 14,) (4) Where the yearly tenant is evicted for the per- sistent exercise of any right a. not necesssary to the due cultivation of his holding : — and b. forbidden by his agreement with his landlord. (5) Where the yearly tenant is evicted for persistently and unreasonably refusing to allow the landlord, or those authorized by him, to enter on the holding for certain specified purposes, e.g. mining, cutting turf, &c. B. The landlord can deduct from the compensation : — (By section 3,) 1. Amount of arrears of rent due by the tenant or his pre- decessors in title. 2. Sums due in respect of deterioration of the holding owing to the non-observance on the part of the tenant of any covenant. 3. Any taxes due on the holding and payable by the tenant. C. The tenant is not entitled to compensation who, after the passing of the Act : — (By section 3,) 1. Subdivides or sublets his holding without the consent in writing of the landlord. 2. After prohibition in writing lets it in conacre, save for the purpose of being solely used for green crops. 3. Holds for a lease for more than 31 years. (By section 12,) 4. Has contracted in writing not to make such claim. X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 145 Provided that (1) his holding is over £50 annual value, (2) it is not subject to customary usage. (By section 13,) 5. When the tenancy is from year to year existing at the time of the passing of the Act assigns , (1) without the consent of the landlord, and (2) landlord does not accept assignee. Provided that I. sufficient rent is in arrears at the time of the assign- ment to render the tenant liable to eviction : — or II. such assignment is contrary to the customary usage of the estate : — or III. the Court thinks the landlord's refusal to accept the new tenant to be reasonable \ On examination it is seen that one of the most striking of the above provisions is that which enables an ejectment by the landlord, even for non-payment of rent or for breach of covenant, to be held a disturbance (and hence to entitle the tenant to compensation), if the holding is under £15 annual value^ and the Court certifies that the rent is exorbitant. The reason of the exemption of the two cases of non-payment of rent and breach of covenant from the disturbances by the land- lord which were penalized in damages is the fact that the eviction results from the tenant's own act. It is hard to logically support the exemption of holdings under £15 from this rule on account of the rent being exorbitant, as such an argument would apply equally to holdings at a higher rental. The reason for the enactment no doubt was a desire to shelter the small tenants whose rent was forced up by the action of the landlord, who might hence be said to be himself the origin of the act on which eviction was taken. Plainly however, when the high rent was the result of the 'reckless 1 The transmission of a tenancy by the landlord in refusing compensation, bequest to certain near relations or its Sec. 13. devolution by operation of law is not ^ ggg ante, p. 143. such an assignment as would justify M, 10 146 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. competition' of the tenants an exemption cannot be supported on logical grounds, as the termination of the tenancy by evic- tion on non-payment of rent in a double sense originates with the tenant, in that (1) he did not pay his rent, and (2) he voluntarily undertook more than he could perform \ Passing from the grounds on which the compensation was to be given, or on which exemption could be claimed by the landlord, to the nature and amount of the compensation itself, the rules of the Act of 1870 appear open to objection. Section 3 enacts that the limit of the compensation is to be regulated thus; holdings valued under the Acts relating to the valuation of rateable property in Ireland at an annual value of (1) £10 and under, a sum which shall in no case exceed seven years' rent. (2) Above £10 and not exceeding £80, a sum which shall in no case exceed five years' rent. (3) Above £30 and not exceeding £40, a sum which shall in no case exceed four years' rent. (4) Above £40 and not exceeding £50, a sum which shall in no case exceed three years' rent. (5) Above £60 and not exceeding £100, a sum which shall in no case exceed two years' rent. (6) Above £100, a sum which shall in no case exceed one year's rent. But in no case shall the compensation exceed the sum of £250^ The late Dr Richey, in criticising the scheme of compen- sation adopted here, said, — "as the maximum of the compen- sation in each case is calculated upon the basis, not of the valuation, but of the rent, the amount of compensation varies in the inverse ratio of the value of the interest, which has been lost by the tenant. The higher the rent reserved upon a lease, the less it will fetch at an auction ; and on the other hand its 1 See Kichey, pp. 73, 74 and note. pensation for disturbance by the im- 2 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 3. The mediate landlord is given on the same scale of compensation quoted applies scale in the case of yearly tenancies to tenancies created after the passing of existing at the time of the passing of the Act, but by the same section com- the Act. X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 147 value would be augmented if the rent were reduced. If A be tenant from year to year of a farm valued at £10, and pays a rent of £15 per annum, and B holds a farm of equal rating but pays only £5 per annum rent, it is manifest that B's interest in his holding is much more valuable than that of A ; under this section, however, A would be entitled to the sum of £105 as compensation for disturbance, but B only to £35 \" In addition to the foregoing objections to the system on which the compensation was calculated ^ it has been already mentioned that the amount of the compensation to be paid was found insufficient to check the action of the evicting landlord, owing to the fact that a new tenant was often to be found who ■ was ready to pay the compensation to the outgoing tenant in order to gain possession of the holding. This same fact tended also to produce large holdings — a most unexpected result — for if a tenant A, who already held a farm on an estate, expressed a desire to take up other small holdings, and offered to pay the compensation to the evicted tenants, it is obvious that the interest of the landlord would be strongly enlisted in the change. The compensation he would have to pay to A, should he afterwards evict him from the enlarged holding, would be far less than the combined compensation he would have had to pay to the other small holders. It is also plain that the mode of compensation here adopted is a bar to the creation of improvements by the landlord, since these would, although 1 See Kichey, pp. 68 and 69. This a separate or additional claim for relates of course merely to compensa- improvements other than permanent tion for disturbance, and is founded buildings and reclamation of waste on the theory of the maximum value land. having been awarded in both cases. ^ In practice the result of the statu- It does not affect the position of A and tory limitations of the compensation B as regards compensation for im- for disturbance, combined with the provements; but it should be noticed discretion given to County Court Judges that sec. 3 also enacts that no tenant as to assessal, resulted in a rough and of a holding valued at a yearly sum ready administration of justice. The exceeding £10 and claiming under this Judges taking the tenant as primd section more than four years' rent, and facie entitled to the full amount of the no tenant of a holding valued at a compensation, and casting upon the yearly sum not exceeding £10 and landlord the onus of proving claims in claiming as aforesaid more than five reduction, years' rent, shall be entitled to make 10—2 148 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. increasing the rent, at the same time probably raise the com- pensation which must be paid on terminating the holdings \ The difficulty that under compulsion the tenants might agree to contract themselves out of these provisions for compen- sation was met by section 3, which made such a contract void both in law and equity (subject to exception if the holding was of more than £50 annual value and the contract not to claim was in writing'^). Mr Gladstone thus justified this enactment: " our desire is to interfere with freedom of contract as little as possible. We are about to interfere with it in regard to the terms on which minor tenancies may be taken up, because we say that in the circumstances of Ireland the tenant is not free ; but as we move upwards in the scale of the value of holdings, at last, undoubtedly, we reach a point where the tenant may be said to be free I" In order to prevent the landlord changing the nature of the tenancies granted, so as to escape on a side issue from his liability to compensation, section 69 enacted that a tenancy at will, or less than a tenancy from year to year, gave the tenant the same rights as to notice to quit and compensation as did a tenancy from year to year. Only one more point need be dealt with before leaving the subject of compensation for disturbance and passing to the enactments as to improvements — this point is the question of the rights of sub-tenants, which is dealt with in section 20 in a highly inadequate manner. By this section, when the estate of the middleman terminates " by reason of disturbance or otherwise" and "involves the interests of any such persons other than the tenant quitting his holding, the Court shall determine the whole amount payable under this Act on the occasion of such tenant quitting his holding and shall direct payment of the same by such person, and to such one or more of the persons interested, and in such manner as the Court thinks just." It is plain that the amount due from the superior landlord to the evicted middleman would probably be a far smaller sum than that to which the combined claims of his tenants would have amounted, had he himself 1 A very interesting example of this ^ gee. 12, and see ante, p. 145. is given by Dr Richey, pp. 70 and 71. ^ Hansard, 3rd series, cxcix. p. 370. X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 149 evicted them. Therefore, though the tenant is in each case turned from his holding, the amount of compensation he receives is widely different^; a very unsatisfactory result^ The second object aimed at by the Act of 1870 was the settlement of the vexed question of improvements by compen- sating the tenant on the termination of his tenancy for those of a permanent nature which he had made in his holding. Mr Gladstone, in his speech on the motion, established very clearly the equitable claim of the tenants to some such protection. When alluding to the effect of the Incumbered Estates Act 1848^ he drew attention to the fact that while the older class of land- lords had but in few cases improperly increased the rents of the holdings on the ground of improvements which the tenants had themselves made ; yet, when the properties of these landlords came into the Incumbered Estates Court, "the purchasers bought them as they were, and no distinction was drawn between the soil itself and the improvements made by the tenant. So that the improvements were sold to persons who gave a price for them ; sold away from the tenant to whom they ought to have belonged ; and the price was paid to the outgoing landlord, who undoubtedly ought not to have been entitled to claim the pro- perty in them, and would not have been so entitled if the legislation recommended in 1845* had been adopted^". The form taken by the provisions enacted for the purpose of thus compensating the tenant was : — that any tenant who is not entitled (or being entitled does not claim) under the Ulster or similar customs, may claim compensation for improvements which have been made by himself or his predecessors in title ^: save in the following cases : 1 Dr Eichey gives an illustration of landlord; unless (1) the landlord has this, pp. 78, 79, and 80. given him permission to gain the sum 2 It should be noticed that by sec. 7 from the incoming tenant, (2) such a tenant who has neither claimed com- money was paid during the existence pensation for disturbance, nor under a of a lease, before the passing of the customary right, is entitled to compen- Act. sation on leaving his holding for money ^ 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48. paid on coming into his holding by ^ By the Devon Commission, himself or his predecessors in title with ^ Hansard, 3rd series, cxcix. p. 344. the express or implied consent of the ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 4. Lie^ ^ V^ Of THE UNIVERSITY 160 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. (1) When the said improvements have been in exist- ence for 20 years — (unless they consist of per- manent buildings or reclamations of waste land, in which cases he may claim). (2) When the landlord has prohibited in writing the making of such improvements as detrimental to the estate \ (3) When they were made in pursuance of a contract for valuable consideration. (4) When made in contravention of an agreement in writing not to make such improvements (subject to the rule as to when such a prohibitory con- tract is allowed). (5) When the landlord has undertaken to make the said improvements (unless he has failed to do so within reasonable time). (6) When he holds under a lease or written contract made before the Act in which his right to com- pensation is expressly excluded. (7) When he holds under a lease for 31 years, or one which has actually so long subsisted : — (but here compensation is allowed for permanent buildings, unexhausted manures and reclamation of waste). (8) When he is quitting voluntarily, and his land- lord has given him permission to dispose of his interest in the improvements to the incoming tenant upon such terms as the Court may deem reasonable, and he has refused or neglected to avail himself of this permission. When the amount of compensation is being reckoned all sums due to the landlord for rent, deterioration of the holding from breach of the tenant's covenants, or for the tenant's taxes, may be deducted. Further regulations in the same section'^ of the Act : — 1 When they appear to the Court to lease granted before the passing of the be detrimental, and are made within Act, sec. 4, sub-s. (1). two years after the passing of the Act, ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 4. or during the unexpired residue of a I X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 151 1. Render void any contract between landlord and tenant whereby the latter is restrained from making improvements required for the suitable occupation of his holding. 2. Render void any contract whereby the tenant is de- prived of his right to claim compensation for improvements (save in the cases above excepted; and in holdings over £50 annual value, and not subject to Ulster customs or the like, where the contract is in writing). 3. Enact that when the improvements have been made before the Act, the Court, in considering the amount of the compensation to be granted, shall take into consideration the length of time for which the tenant has had the use of them, or any set-off which may have been granted by the landlord. While (By section 6) the landlord or tenant may register their improvements in the Landed Estates Court, and (By section 5^) the presumption of law is stated always to be that any improvements are the work of the tenant; save in the following cases, where compensation is claimed for improve- ments made before the Act, and I. the improvements were made previous to the time when the title accrued by actual sale to the landlord or those through whom he claims. II. the tenant held under a lease. III. the improvements were made 20 years before the Act. IV. the holding is valued at over £100 annual value. V. the Court holds, on the ground of the practice of the estate, that such ought not to be presumed. VI. the Court is satisfied that the improvements were not the work of the tenant. Provided that where it is proved to have been the practice for the landlord to assist in making the improvements the pre- sumption shall be modified accordingly. The third object aimed at by the Act of 1870 was the ^ Does not apply if (1) holding is (2) tenant seeks compensation under Bubjeet to Ulster or similar customs ; them. 152 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. establishment of peasant proprietors. For this purpose clauses termed the Bright Clauses^ were inserted in the Act, the inten- tion of which was to facilitate the purchase by a tenant of his holding either 1. By agreement with his landlord, or 2. From the Court, in estates directed to be sold by the Landed Estates Court. In the first case the procedure to be adopted was that when an agreement for the sale had been made between the landlord and tenant, they might jointly (or either of them separately with the assent of the other) apply to the Court to carry out the sale^ The powers of purchase given by the Act proved valueless in both the case of a sale by agreement and a forced sale of an incumbered estate ^ but the provisions for sales of the first class proved even more faulty than those regulating the latter. The general faults which marred the Bright Clauses proved to be : — (1) The absolute title given by the Landed Estates Court to the purchaser. It seems strange that this power of the Court to give a title which absolutely extinguishes all rights adverse to the terms of the grant should have operated as an evil ; for it was not unnaturally supposed that the indefeasible nature of the title given would have constituted its greatest advantage. But the fact that no error could afterwards be remedied, that the title given would hold, even if the clearest rights of third parties proved to have been infringed, or more land than was really saleable had been conveyed, paralyzed the action of the Courts by the nicety of the enquiry needed*. 1 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 32 — 41. this course being found inconsistent 2 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 32. with the interests of owners and in- 3 Mr Justice Field says, " The provi- cumbrancers. " Landholding, p. 318. sions for facihtating the acquisition ^ ggg Richey, pp. 82 and 85. *' A by tenants of their holdings forming Landed Estates Court conveyance af- part of estates the sale of which had fects not only the rights of the par- been directed by the Landed Es- ties to the proceedings, but binds all tates Court failed chiefly in conse- persons, whether parties or not, and quence of the general refusal of the au- extinguishes all rights which are in- thorities to arrange lots so as to suit consistent with the terms of the grant the convenience of purchasing tenants, by the Court." X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 153 (2) The amount which the Commissioners of Public Works in Ireland were allowed to advance to the tenant for the purpose of purchasing his holding was not sufficient. By the Act of 1870* the amount was limited to two-thirds of the price of the holding^, and though it was increased by an Act of 1872^ to two-thirds of the value of the holding (while on being satisfied with the title the Board was able to make advances to tenants purchasing by agreement with the land- lords, without the expense of passing the holding through the Landed Estates Court) it still proved to be inadequate. This was due to two causes : a. The provision of the Act of 1870* that where any such advance was made the tenant was precluded from alienating, assigning, or subletting his holding without the consent of the Board, while any portion of the annuities remained unpaid on pain of forfeiture ^ fi. The Board, considering themselves as trustees for public money, required unexceptionable securities for their advances, and, in the opinion of the tenants, did not act freely in the matter I (3) The difficulty of making the tenants understand their rights under the Act. The special faults of the Act in regard to sales by agree- ment were that : — (1) The landlord is required to deposit with the applica- 1 Sec. 44, 45. viz. two-thirds in lieu of three-fourths 2 On such an advance the holding of the purchase-money. See Eeport of was deemed to be charged with an Bessborough Commission, § 87. annuity of £5 for every £100 of ^ ^5 & 36 Vict. c. 32, sec. 1. such advance and so in proportion ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 44. for any less sum, such annuity to be ^ Power was given by the Amending limited in favour of the Board and to Act of 1872 to commute forfeitures for be declared to be repayable in the a sale and to pay the balance of the term of 35 years (33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, s. proceeds to the original purchaser. 44,45). This makes the rate of interest ^ gee Eichey, p. 88. The Board 3^ per cent, and hence more favour- does not seem to have been in any able than the terms of the Church way opposed to the creation of a pea- Commissioners, but the proportion to sant proprietary, be advanced on mortgage was less, 154 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. tion a sum of money as security for costs if required by the Court to do so\ In practice, as might have been expected, the result of this was to cast the work of providing this sum upon the tenant. (2) All the cost of the complicated enquiry which the nature of the title given by the Court rendered necessary (es- pecially heavy when the landlord was only a limited owner) had to be borne by the tenant, and single holdings proved unequal to the task*^. (3) The estate passed to the tenant, though free from in- cumbrances, was, by section 36, still liable to certain charges, such as quit rents, rent- charges in lieu of tithes, heriots, charges for draining etc. As pointed out by the late Dr E/ichey, though these charges were not felt by the tenant paying an annual rent, they were a serious matter to pur- chasers ; since if several tenants purchased their holdings the person entitled to the charge could proceed against any one of them for the amount of the whole charge ; and the Court proved slow to use the powers given by section 40^ to apportion charges, rents and covenants ^ While in the case of the sale of separate holdings it was not possible to indemnify the purchaser by casting the burden of the charge on the residue of the landlord's estate, as this operation, if frequently repeated, would at length render the residue of his land unsaleable. The Act of 1870 had to undergo a stormy history. It is probable that the inherent defects of the Act were so great that in any case it would have signally failed to ameliorate the tenants' position even had it had an unchequered career, but 1 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 34. rent should not in any appreciable 2 This question of excessive costs degree be made less secure, or less en- was dwelt on in the Keport of the Com- joyable, or less marketable. It is idle to mittee of the House of Commons 1877- suppose that the property of the owner 1878. of the head-rent would not be seriously 3 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 40. depreciated by being broken into se- 4 "The Court has always been slow veral smaller rent-charges apportioned and unwilling to exercise the power of among the holdings of the tenants apportioning rent-charges upon the who had purchased the fee under the premises sold, and requires it to be sections in question." Eichey, pp. 86, clearly shown that the interest of the 87. X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 155 it was also met by a fatal combination of circumstances. Not only was an agitation, which even if rooted in distress was un- scrupulous and fanatical in operation, directed against it ; but the very elements conspired to wreck its chances. At first the prosperous seasons veiled the evil, but they only (by raising the credit of the tenants and so enabling them to load them- selves with debt) increased the troubles which the subsequent depression brought; and it cannot be denied that the only effect of the Act was to afford new grievances to both landlord and tenant. CHAPTER XI. The Act of 1881. The years following 1870 were at first jesirs of unusual prosperity for Ireland. In 1872 the exports of goods from Belfast rose to an excess of £2,300,000^ more than in 1870, and to an excess of £3,400,000 over 1869 ; though unfortunately this was accompanied by a corresponding increase in the population. The general cotton trade revived, and some remarkable figures are given in Dr Hancock's'^ report of the Irish savings and other banks ; he says " the aggregate investments of the Irish people in Government joint-stock banks and savings banks on the 31st of December 1870 were £63,553,251, and on the 31st of December 1871, £67,331,778, showing an increase of £3,778,527, or £6 per cent." In 1875 despite the existence of an element of discontent the relation of landlord and tenant was not unfriendly ; and English opinion attached very little importance to the growing Home Rule agitation. In the North of Ireland, however, it was evident that a determined struggle was being made to obtain a larger concession of tenant-right than the Act afforded. In 1879 a miserable season not only destroyed the potato crop, but also (by the incessant rain preventing the turf from drying) almost caused a fuel famine. The exports of the country diminished, bank deposits sank, and bankruptcies among the tenant farmers became common ^ The money-lender, that bane of the Irish peasant, pressed for payment, and the agrarian difficulties again became acute. The anti-rent agitation rose 1 See Statement to the Belfast Cham- 2 See Annual Register, 1872. ber of Commerce made by Mr Spotten, ** See Annual Register, 1879. and quoted in Annual Register, 1872. CHAP. XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 157 in Mayo and Galway, and was carried on in most unscrupulous fashion. Gathering to itself the whole of the disaffected popu- lation, and trading on the real misery which the agricultural depression had caused, the movement rapidly became formidable. The Irish Land League was formed, and the agitation was pointedly directed to obtaining for Ireland a peasant proprietor- ship ; the examples of France, Germany and Russia — especially the first — being largely appealed to. It is very noticeable how far the claims of the tenants were now pushed, and it is in a great measure to this creation of a desire for complete possession of the land that the failure of the Act of 1881 may be ascribed. Had the three F's^ been given in 1870, when they were practically the limit of the tenants' de- mand, the settlement of the land question might possibly have been achieved. . Unfortunately the Act when passed was only a tardy concession to circumstances, and did nothing to satisfy the wild hopes that had been created. The advocacy of out- rage, and the sad catalogue of agrarian crime which the fol- lowing years present, is a terrible commentary on the force of the passions aroused. The year 1880 was marked by a con- tinued, indeed an increased, depression ; the invention of " boy- cotting " placed a new and most formidable offensive weapon in the hands of the most unscrupulous of the agitators, and the land system of Ireland was practically at a deadlock. In the midst of social tumult and extreme depression Mr Gladstone again essayed the solution of the difficulty. Fortunately in considering the position of the Irish land system prior to the Act of 1881, we are possessed of two most valuable sources of information in the evidence collected by, and the reports of, two Commissions (called respectively the Richmond and the Bessborough Commissions), appointed to en- quire into the agricultural position in Ireland and the working of the Act of 1870. The former of these issued in August 1879, and, though different opinions as to the most advantageous remedies to be applied to the existing evils were held by the Commissioners, the reports and evidence concur in showing : — (1) That there was widespread distress and dissatisfaction in 1 Fixity of tenure, fair rent, and free sale. See post, p. 159, 160. 158 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. the country, and (2) That the Act of 1870 had done nothing towards a satisfactory solution of the land question. The preliminary report issued in January 1881 by the majority of the Commissioners gave us the chief causes of the unfortunate state of landed relations : 1. The inclemency of the seasons, and the failure of the potato crop. 2. Foreign competition. 3. An undue inflation of credit produced by the security afforded by the Land Act of 1870, and by a series of prosperous seasons. 4. The excessive competition for land (mainly due to the fact that apart from the actual possession of the soil, there were few, if any, means of subsistence for the population), which had led to serious abuses, such as : — (1) Unreasonable payments for tenant-right. (2) Arbitrary increase of rents. (3) Overcrowding of the population in certain districts. (4) Minute subdivision of farms \ Only one of these heads requires a special mention, that is the one dwelling on the evils of the inflation of credit produced by the Act of 1870. It has been pointed out that, although the object was attained by enactments of a negative kind^, this Act vested a tangible interest in the land in the tenant. An instant expansion in his borrowing capacity followed. Small banks sprang into existence, and money (though not un- frequently at usurious interest) became freely obtainable by the most improvident peasantry in the world. Shop accounts were allowed to run, and small loads of debt were gradually accu- mulated by the farmers. The years of agricultural prosperity which followed 1870 led the farmer class to look hopefully on the future, and when the years of depression ensued they were dragged down not only by the failure of their source of income, but also by an ever increasing load of debt, which nothing but perpetual prosperity could have enabled them to discharge ^ 1 Richmond Commission. s ^.nd see on this subject Richey, 2 See ante, page 137. pp. 98, 99. XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 159 On the 29th of July 1880 the second Commission^ issued, appointing a special examination into the working of the Act of 1870. It is doubly important, both as showing the state of landed relations in Ireland as affected by this Act, and also as furnishing the basis of the Act of 1881 in which Mr Gladstone again dealt with the land question. Most of the reasons ad- vanced by the Bessborough Commission to account for the failure of the former Act have been dealt with in the last chapter, the increase of rents, the insecurity of tenure still existing, the inadequacy of the compensation given, its un- suitability to meet the needs of the tenant, and other faults. The evidence with which these propositions are illustrated is both clear and voluminous, and shows in addition how critical the situation really was with which the Legislature was about to grapple. The Commissioners again differed considerably in the view they took of the land question, but in their principal report^ they stated that the method of the Act of 1870, by which the tenant's interest was dealt with by indirect means, was not suitable. They went on to point out that the distinction drawn between tenancies under Ulster custom and other tenancies was a mistake : and stated that the Ulster custom, as legalized, had failed, showing the same weak points as characterised the land law of the rest of Ireland. They suggested '' that in future the same land law should prevail throughout Ireland, and that the yearly tenants, in every part of the kingdom, should possess the same rights and be subject to the same obligations^" Finally they advocated a change of the law based on the con- cession to the tenant of ' Fixity of Tenure,' ' Fair Eent ' and ' Free Sale ' — that is, the notorious three F's. On the 7th of April Mr Gladstone, on a motion for leave to 1 The Bessborough Commission. but the O'Connor Don and Mr Shaw 2 Five Commissioners were appointed, also sent in supplementary reports viz. The Earl of Bessborough, Baron expressing different views as to the Dowse, The O'Connor Don, Mr William remedy to be adopted for admitted Shaw and Mr Kavanagh. The main evils. report was signed by all save Mr Ka- ^ Report of Bessborough Commis- vanagh (who gave a separate report), sion, pp. 13—39. 160 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. bring in the Land Law (Ireland) Bill 1881, explained in a lengthy speech the lines on which it was proposed to legislate, amounting shortly to a recognition of the three F's and the creation of a special Court for the purposes of the Act. On the 22nd of August 1881 the Act, 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, became law. Besides many blots in this celebrated Statute, which will be treated of in detail when considering its provisions, it may at the out- set be stated that there is much reason to believe that a more advantageous step would have been taken had the previous Acts been completely repealed, and a new, rather than an amending, Statute passed. The paralyzing subtlety of the Act of 1881 was largely increased by its enactments being supple- mentary rather than final; while the process rendering the invocation of the action of the Court necessary was eminently unsuitable to the condition of the country. The prevailing in- fluence of the combination of agitators which has been exerted against the Act; the ingrained distaste of the peasantry to trust themselves in the hands of the law ; the widespread feeling that time will bring even larger concessions^ ; and the cost involved in making the application, have all contributed to prevent the tenants resorting largely to the Courts. The length of the Act prevents the possibility of giving a full summary of its provisions, but its principal features are as follows. First, dealing with the subject of free sale, the tenant for the time being of every holding not specially excepted '^ was enabled to sell his tenancy for the best price he could get^ pro- 1 See 2nd article on the Land Sys- valued at not less than £50 per an- tevi of Ireland, by his Honour Judge num ; (4) holdings let for pasturage O'Connor Morris. Laio Quarterly Re- when the tenant is non-resident ; (5) view, January, 1888. holdings in virtue of being a hired 2 The definition of tenant given in labourer or servant; (6) lettings in sec. 57 excludes middlemen; and notice conacre, etc.; (7) holdings let to the tenancies which are excepted by tenant whilst retaining any office or sec. 58 from the operation of the Act employment, or for temporary conve- (save as regards part v, and in so far nience or necessity (provided there be as it amends the Act of 1870 with contract in writing showing the object regard to improvements), viz. (1) any of the letting); (8) cottage allotments holding not agricultural or pastoral ; not exceeding half an acre ; (9) glebes. (2) demesne lands and town parks; ^ M & 4:5 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1. (3) any holding let for pasture and XL] THE ACT OF 1881. 161 vided that certain regulations were complied with\ Of these the principal were that it should be sold, save with the consent of the landlord ^ to one person only ; that the proposed new tenant was not refused by the landlord on reasonable grounds^ ; and that notice was given by the tenant to the landlord of his intention to sell^ of the name of the purchaser, and of the con- sideration agreed on for the purchase^ The landlord on his part, on receiving notice of the intended sale, has the option of buying in the tenancy^, and of refusing the new tenant on reasonable grounds^, or if he fails to satisfy acknowledged claims against the outgoing tenant for arrears of rent, or for breaches of covenant ^ When he receives notice of an intended sale the landlord, if he is not desirous of purchasing the tenancy "otherwise than as a means of securing the payment of any sums due to him for arrears of rent or other breaches of the contract or conditions of tenancy," if the tenant proceeds with the sale may purchase the tenancy for the sum he claims, pro- vided no purchaser is found to give the same or morel As regards the question of improvements, when any of a permanent nature have been made by the landlord they may, if he consents, be sold with the holding, and he will be entitled to the portion of the purchase-money obtained by their sale*". The 1 And subject to the provisions of the passing of the Act to another the Act as to the sale of a tenancy tenant it is subject to the provisions under statutory conditions. regulating present tenancies. Sec. 20, 2 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1, sub-sec. sub-sec. (3). See post p. 162 (note 4). (1) ; and by sec. 2 the tenant from year ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (6). to year was prohibited from subdividing ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (9). By sub-sec. or subletting his holding without the (15) any sum payable to the landlord consent in writing of the landlord. out of the purchase-money is a first 3 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (6). charge thereon. By sub-sec. (7) in the 4 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (2). case of a sale by a landlord on account ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (4). of a breach of a statutory condition, 6 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (3). The price to the Court has power to grant pay- be agreed upon, or in event of dis- ment of debt, arrears, or damages to agreement to be settled by the Court. the landlord from the purchase -money. Where the landlord purchases a pre- ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1, sub-sec. sent holding neither by the wish of (16). the tenant nor in open market, if the i*' 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1, sub-sec. holding is re-let within 15 years from (8), and said improvements are then M. 11 162 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. tenant who has sold his tenancy on quitting his holding is not entitled to receive compensation for improvements or for dis- turbance \ Ulster tenant-right customs are not interfered with ; the tenant can sell either under the usage or under the Act as he thinks best^ ; but if a tenancy subject to Ulster, or similar usage, be sold under the Act the tenancy remains subject to the custom unless it has been purchased by the landlord I The Act then proceeds to a series of provisions by which the tenant is able to commute his tenure into a protected term for fifteen years, and which is in fact renewable without limit. The way in which this was achieved was in the highest degree ingenious, but the very elaboration of its details hindered practical efficiency. Dealing first with the case where an in- crease of rent is demanded by the landlord from the tenant of a present tenancy* (or in the case of a future tenancy where the landlord demands an increase of rent beyond the amount fixed at its commencement), it provides that if the tenant agrees to continue his holding at the higher rent his tenancy is for the term of fifteen years regulated by what are termed statutory conditions^. These are : that^ provided the tenant (1) duly pays his rent, (2) does not commit persistent waste, (3) does not (without the consent in writing of the land- lord) subdivide or sublet the holding, or erect any dwell- ing-house thereon, save as provided in the Act, otherwise than in substitution for those already there at the date of the passing of the Act, deemed to have been made by the of the passing of the Act, or created purchaser. before the first of January, 1883, in a 1 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (11). And a tenant holding in which a tenancy was sub- who has received compensation for dis- sisting at the time of the Act passing, turbance or improvement is not entitled And every tenancy to which the Act at the same time to sell his tenancy. applies is deemed a present tenancy 2 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (12), and see post until the contrary is proved. Sec. 57. p. 163, 164 for new scale of compensa- ^ Sec. 4, sub-sec. (1). The term of tion, etc. 15 years is called a statutory term. 3 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (13). « Sec. 5. ^ That is, one subsisting at the time XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 163 (4) does not, by any Act, cause the holding to vest in an assignee in bankruptcy, (5) permits the entrance of the landlord to cut timber, mine, shoot, etc., (6) does not, without consent, open any house on the hold- ing for the sale of intoxicating liquors, he shall not be compelled to pay any higher rent than that settled at the commencement of his statutory term, and shall not be ousted from the holding, save for breach of one of the statu- tory conditions. The landlord also is prohibited from taking pro- ceedings to compel the tenant to quit his holding for breach of any of the statutory conditions save as follows (a) where the con- dition broken is that of due payment of rent he can proceed by ejectment, (6) where the condition broken is any other statutory condition, then by ejectment founded on notice to quit\ the Court being allowed to grant relief against forfeiture upon payment of damages or otherwise, if it should appear equitablel If on the increase of rent being proposed the tenant refuses to pay the higher rate he may claim compensation for dis- turbance if he is compelled to abandon the holding by notice to quit and does not sell the tenancy^ The Act of 1881 provides an amended scale of compensation for disturbance'', which is, as regards all tenancies above the annual rental of £10, higher than the scale given in the Act of 1870^ and is also more equitable, as not only is the amount of compensation regulated with regard to the rent paid, but the classes of holdings are ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 13, sub- by breach of a statutory condition, sec. (3) b. The purchaser of a present tenancy 2 See Field, p. 333, and 44 & 45 sold in consequence of a breach of a Vict. c. 49, sec. 13, sub-sec. (3) & (4). A statutory condition was not entitled to tenant compelled to quit his holding claim a judicial rent, but might hold at during the continuance of a statutory a previously settled rent for the re- term in his tenancy, in consequence of mainder of the statutory term. This a breach by him of a statutory condi- applies also to the case of a tenancy not tion, lost his right to compensation for subject to statutory conditions in case disturbance, sec. 13, sub-sec. (6) : but of a similar breach. Sec. 20. by sec. 20, sub-sec. (4), if he held under ^ ggc. 4 sub-sec. (3), and sec. 6. the Ulster tenant-right custom he was ^ Sec. 6. entitled to the benefit of the custom ^ The limit of £250 as the maxi- despite the termination of his tenancy mum of compensation was abolished. 11—2 164 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. also regulated in the same way. The faults pointed out therefore in the compensation clauses of the Act of 1870 (where in the case of two tenants holding farms of the same valuation, but one paying more rent than the other, the absurd result was reached that the tenant who paid less rent, and hence had the most valuable interest in his holding, was prima facie entitled to the smaller compensation for losing his farm^) are avoided, and a more reasonable measure of compensation afforded. In ad- dition, section 3 of the Act of 1870 was amended by the striking out of the words " for the loss which the Court shall find to be sustained by him by reason of quitting his holding," so that the tenant is entitled to such compensation as the Court, in view of all the circumstances of the case thinks proper, subject of course to the scale of compensation given in the Act of 1881. A further protection is given to the tenant in that his right to sell his holding is not barred by the landlord having taken proceedings to compel him to quit ; for at any time before six months from the execution of a writ or decree for possession in an ejectment for non-payment of rent^ he may sell his tenancy, and if sold it is held to be an existing tenancy de- spite these proceedings I As regards compensation for improvements also a step further is taken, The provisions of the Act of 1870 had rendered it possible for a landlord in many cases by changing the rent of a holding, or by a slight alteration of the holding, to create a new tenancy, even though the same tenant remained in possession, and hence to bar the claim of the tenant to com- pensation* ; but the Act of 1881 prevents the creation of such a new tenancy from rendering void the right to compensation ^ ^ See ante, pp. 146, 147. ancy is not redeemed within six 2 And he might also sell his tenancy months, being however preserved. Sec. at any time before, but not after, the 13, sub-sec. (1). execution of such writ or decree in any ^ This was rendered possible by the other ejectment than for non-payment construction given to the words " made of rent. Sec. 13 (1). And within the by himself (the tenant) or his predeces- same periods, if the decree has been sors in title." See Field, p. 317, 318, obtained before the Act, the tenant and 333, and Irish Land Acts, by G. may apply to the Court to fix the judi- McDermot. cial rent of the holding. ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 7. 3 The landlord's rights, if the ten- XL] THE ACT OF 1881. 165 If the tenant whose rent the landlord proposes to raise does not wish to accept the increase the Act provides also another remedy for him\ This remedy varies according as the tenancy is a present^ or a future one*. (1) In the case of a present tenancy the tenant can make an application to the Court to fix the fair rent ^ for the holding. This right to get a fair rent fixed, moreover, is not confined to the case where the landlord desires to raise the rent of the holding; for by sec- tion 8^, the tenant of any present tenancy to which the Act ap- plies, or such tenant and the landlord jointly, or the landlord when he has failed to come to an agreement with the tenant, may apply to the Court to fix the fair rent of the holding. When the judicial rent has been fixed by the Court, then for fifteen years the tenancy becomes one subject to statutory conditions ^ During that time the rent cannot be altered': while even if proceedings have been taken to compel the tenant to quit his holding, and are pending before the application of the tenant to the Court to fix a judicial rent is disposed of, the Court has the power to postpone or suspend such proceedings till the question of the judicial rent is settled^ In the case of a present tenancy also, which is not a statutory term, the landlord and tenant, if they agree in writing as to what is then a fair rent for the holding and file the agreement in Court, can commute the tenancy into a statutory term^. (2) In the case of a future tenancy the tenant, if he refuses to pay an increase of rent demanded by the landlord, may sell the tenancy, which is then i See Field, p. 331. « Sec. 8, sub-sec. (3). 2 See ante, p. 162, note (4). ^ An application to the Court to de- 3 i.e. created after the passing of the termine a judicial rent may not be Act. made except during the last twelve * Sec. 8 (1). By sub-sec. 5, more- months of the current statutory term, over, the Court may also on applica- Sec. 8, sub-sec. (8). But notice the in- tion fix the value of the holding, and terference with the ' fair rents ' under then if during the term the tenant the Act of 1887. It was rendered ne- gives notice to sell, the landlord may cessary by the severe agricultural de- purchase at that value plus any addition pression. See ^os« p. 180, 181. for extra improvements. This section ^ Sec. 13, sub-sec. (3). does not apply to holdings under the ^ Sec. 8, sub-sec. (6). A similar agree- Ulster custom. ment may be made during the last 5 Sub-sec. (1). twelve months of a statutory term. 166 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. to be sold subject to the increased rent, and the tenant is en- titled to receive from the landlord any sum by which the Court shall decide the selling value of his tenancy to have been de- preciated below what it would have fetched at a fair rent : while in addition the Court may grant him the costs of the saleV Under the Act of 1870 efforts were made to force the hand of the landlord, and to make him in his own interest create leases for a term of not less than 31 yearsl The Act of 1881 also offered facilities for the creation of terms of this kind; enacting that, if the tenant of a tenancy to which the Act applies is not in possession of either a statutory or a fixed tenancy, a lease by agreement between the landlord and such tenant for not less than 31 years shall, when sanctioned by the Court, become a 'judicial lease ' and lie outside the provisions of the statute I Yet another species of tenure might be created under the Act of 1881 by agreement between landlord and tenant, and substituted for that previously existing in the holding, namely, what is described as a 'fixed tenancy*.' The conditions of this kind of holding are mainly dependent on the agreement be- tween the parties, subject to the proviso that the tenant (1) pays a fee-farm rent^ and (2) is not to be compelled to leave his holding save on breach of a statutory condition. The result of the provisions as to fixity of tenure^ which 1 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 4, sub- the lessee shall be deemed to be the sec. (2). tenant of a present ordinary tenancy" 2 See ante, pp. 137, 138. (i.e. one neither (a) subject to statutory 3 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 10. conditions, nor (&) to a judicial lease, nor These provisions apply also to the pro- (c) a fixed tenancy, but which is within posed tenant of any holding to which the Act. See sec. 5) " from year to year the Act applies and which is not sub- at the rent and subject to the condi- ject to a subsisting tenancy. See also tions of the lease, so far as such condi- Field, p. 336 and 337. The question tions are applicable to such tenancy." naturally arises, what would be the ^ Sec. 11. position of a present tenant, who •''' Sec. 12. This rent may or may changed his yearly tenancy for such a not be subject to revision once in 15 lease, upon its termination ? In answer years as agreed between landlord and to this sec. 10 of the Act provides that tenant. " at the expiration of a judicial lease ^ Fixity of tenure was of course also made to the tenant of a present tenancy aided by the improved rules for com- and for a term not exceeding 60 years, pensation for disturbance. XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 167 have been dealt with, therefore, is in short that a tenant under the Act can (1) on an increase of rent being proposed by the landlord and accepted by the tenant, or (2) in the case of a present tenancy without an increase having been proposed, by application to the Court commute his tenancy into a statutory term ; while in the case of leases for more than 31 years, and of fixed tenancies, the agreement of the landlord and tenant without litigation becomes binding \ A large equitable power was vested in the Court by the provision^ which enacted that on the hearing of any appli- cation of a landlord or tenant, if the Court was of opinion that the conduct of either party had been unreasonable, the application might be (1) refused, or (2) granted subject to conditions ; and that the offending party might be penalized in costs. The Court also had power, in the case of leases existing at the time of the passing of the Act, where unjust terms had been im- posed upon the tenant on his acceptance of the said lease after the passing of the Act of 1870, to set aside the lease on the application^ of the tenant and place him on the same footing as that occupied by the holder of an ordinary tenancy*. It will be remembered that under the Act of 1870 the Board of Works was authorized to advance two-thirds of the price of the holding to a tenant desirous of purchasing, and it has been pointed out that (despite this being increased by 1 See Field, p. 338. And it should by a written agreement to contract be noticed that by sec. 20, sub-sec. (2), himself out of the operation of either where the landlord resumes possession of the Acts. In another case also of a present tenancy and reinstates the a contract inconsistent with the Acts tenant, such tenancy again becomes is allowed, for by sec. 22, when a hold- subject to the provisions of the Act as ing subject to customary rights has regards present tenancies, and if the been purchased by the landlord by parties agree at the time of the re- voluntary purchase before the Act of instatement as to rent to be paid it 1881, and the owner is in actual occu- becomes a judicial rent. pation ; at the date of the passing of 2 Sec. 9. the Act then in a first tenancy of 2 Such application to be made within the holding subsequently created by six months of the passing of the Act of written agreement the tenancy may 1881. See Field 339, and 44 & 45 be exempted from the provisions of Vict. c. 49, sec. 21. sec. 1 as to free sale. 44 & 45 Vict. c. ^ But the tenant of a holding of 49, sec. 22. more than £150 annual value was able 168 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. the Act of 1872* to two-thirds of the value of the holding) these purchase clauses failed signally. The new purchase clauses of the Act of 1881 also provided for the advance of money to the purchasing tenant, but regulated the advances in a different way. The Land Commission was empowered ^ if satisfied with the security, to advance^ sums to the purchasing tenant to the following amounts. 1. If the tenant is about to purchase from the landlord for a principal sum — then not more than three-fourths of such sum. 2. If the tenant purchases by paying a fine and engaging to pay a fee-farm rent — then any sum not exceeding one half of the fine, on condition that the fee-farm rent is not more than seventy-five per cent, of what the Commissioners think a fair rent for the holding. And the Act further sought to facilitate sales to the tenants by allowing the Commission under certain conditions to purchase estates from the landlords and to sell them again to the tenants*; and by allowing the Commission to indemnify the tenant purchasers of an incumbered estate against incum- brances ^ This then being an outline of the provisions^ of the cele- brated Act of 1881, which again remodelled the whole of the system of agricultural holdings in Ireland, it is possible in the light of after events to detect many flaws and also to observe many good points. The Act, as has been pointed out, was greatly marred for practical purposes by its own subtlety, and in addition the details as to procedure proved at first to work but indifferently, and complaints were made that the judgments as to improvements, etc. by the Commissioners were 1 35 & 36 Vict. c. 32, sec. 1, sub- until the whole charge was paid off sec. (1). the tenant might not subdivide or let 2 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 24, sub- his holding without consent. Sec. 30, sec. (1). sub-sec. (1) a. 3 Such advances to be repaid by an ^ Sec. 26, sub-sec. (1) ; and see annuity in favour of the Land Com- Field, p. 341. mission for 35 years of £5 for every ^ Sec. 26, sub. -sec. (5). hundred advanced, and so in propor- ^ See post p. 179 note 1 as to provi- tion for every less sum, sec. 28 ; and sions for emigration. XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 169 not sufficiently specific to set vexed questions finally at rest ^ A large amount of criticism was focused on the Act, and various objections to its principle were raised. It was urged that {apart even from what many considered a most unwarrant- able inroad on the rights of the landlord^) a dual ownership was established in the soil, a thing which was termed radically evil. Yet this dual ownership is to be found all over Europe, and Ulster tenant-right presents about the one satisfactory feature of the land history of Ireland. Again, another body of the opponents of the Act deplored the vanished rights of the landlord, which they declared to be now reduced to a rent- charge on his estates. Yet he still possessed the remedies of distress, ejectment, action, and injunction; while he had a right to enter on the tenant's land for the purpose of min- ing, quarrying, hunting', etc.; possessed rights to woods and minerals, held the reversion of the tenant's estate, and had a right every fifteen years to a revision of rent^ It was stated that the principle of the Act was adverse to the making of improvements by the landlord ; but where most of the hold- ings are small, and the works are therefore usually the result of the labour of the tenant, this does not apply as it would in a country where large farms and valuable holdings are the rule^ Another class of objections was, that no Government^ machinery could properly value rents, which were purely local matters and could only be settled fairly by persons intimately acquainted with the particular district under consideration; that the landlord would still incur odium by having to resort to eviction on breach of the statutory conditions; that the rent 1 See Report of Select Committee of ^ gee. 5, sub-sec. (5). the House of Lords, 1882. ^ O'Connor Morris, Land Systevi of 2 And without expressing an opinion Ireland, part ii. L. Q. Revieiv, Janu- as to whether the exigencies of the ary, 1888. Irish situation made the recognition of ^ ijjjjj^ tenant-rights in the land imperative ^ This objection was urged by Mr or not, there is no doubt that his Bonamy Price in his special report on rights were largely restricted. the Richmond Commission. 170 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. which would be fair from a poor tenant would be too small if paid by a richer one ; and that despite the provisions against subdivision and subletting, the ultimate effect of the Act would be to increase or at least perpetuate ' starvation holdings.' In all of these last objections there lies a germ of truth, but none of them were sufficiently developed to cause serious harm, and had the Act succeeded in other ways it would have com- pensated for the smaller evils caused. Unfortunately the pur- chase clauses, which were held the most vital portion of the measure, failed completely. The Select Committee of the House of Lords, which in 1882 examined the working of the Act, cast some light on the reason of this failure \ the evidence tending to show that the Land Commission should be empowered to advance the whole purchase-money'^ of his holding to the tenant to render purchase possible ; the amount which might be ad- vanced under the Act being insufficient. The Committee them- selves^ ascribed the failure of the purchase clauses to the fact, that : — 1. When a limited owner sold to a tenant the money passed into Chancery, and was invested on the low interest of Government Stock, while the expenses of the process were heavy. 2. When the land is subject to a quit rent*, all the holdings into which any estate is divided remain liable for it, the Commissioners not being able to apportion, &c. 3. "Under the present arrangements there is no suffi- cient inducement to the tenant to purchase his holding at any price at which the owner would be likely to sell it;" this arising not so much from the fault of the provisions for pur- chase as from the singularly good position of the tenant of a statutory term. 1 It must be remembered that this keeping them in Ireland. Committee was appointed in the face ^ The Committee suggested that the of the opposition of the House of Com- loans should be advanced at 3 per mons, and represented practically the cent, or 4 per cent, landlord interest. A preliminary re- ^ Preliminary Beport of the Select port was published but not a final one. Committee, 1882, Parliamentary Papers as the evidence of the sub-commis- Vol. viii. sioners working under the Act could * And nearly one-third of the land not be obtained, owing to their duties of Ireland was so subject. XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 171 It is undeniable that the efforts of the agitation, which has exerted such an influence on the minds and methods of the Irish peasantry, has been employed rather against the accept- ance by the tenantry of the advantages of the Act, while it has pointedly prevented the working of the provisions for free sale\ As a result the Act of 1881 has failed to allay the popular discontent, and the tenantry have on the whole made scanty use of its provisions. A very large number of applica- tions to fix fair rents'^ have indeed been made, but during the first year of the Act only forty cases of application for judicial leases^ came before the Court, and during the same period only 85 tenants made use of the purchase clauses. In some ways this would tend to show that the question of fair rent is the one which tenants regard as being of the most vital importance, and would rather militate against the idea that they are eager to possess the fee of the soil. The position of the agricultural tenants in Ireland under the Acts of 1870 and 1881 is certainly remarkable ; for their tenure, which before these Acts was marked by complete uncertainty, has been changed to one in the highest degree favourable to the tenant. The attempt to reconcile law and fact by con- structing statutes on the basis of the ideas and expectations of the tenantry has been carried to a remarkable extent, and the position of the Irish tenant from year to year is absolutely unique in the manner in which it is fenced and protected by legislation, until it greatly resembles a tenancy in perpetuity. Despite the faults which have been pointed out in the Acts of over-subtlety and want of finality, it is hard not to believe that they contain within them the groundwork of a satisfactory settlement of the land question. 1 See O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Be- applications for fixed tenancies, two of view, 1888. which were withdrawn, while 15 were 2 See Field, p. 357. No less than pending and three had been granted, 80,187 notices to fix being lodged in and the necessary documents sealed." the fiurst year of the Act. See Field, p. 357, from Eeport of the 3 " Three leases only were executed Irish Land Commissioners of the first and sealed during the year. Twenty year's working of the Act. CHAPTER XII. Recent Legislation. No sooner had the Act of 1881 granted to the Irish tenant a degree of legislative protection unexampled in the history of English law than popular demands again became heard, and it was apparent that instead of solving the agrarian difficulty the Act had but whetted the desire for further concession. Two objects were now aimed at by even the more moderate of the tenants, (1) the abolition of arrears, and (2) the creation of an absolute peasant proprietary. The political complications of 1882 are too much concerned with present controversial politics to fall within the scope of this essay. But, whatever the cause, the state of Ireland was most critical. The ' no rent ' agitation which has met with such universal condemnation had been started at the end of 1881; and the following year was marked by a ghastly catalogue of crime, while disorder and disaffection ran riot through the land. On the 15th of May 1882 Mr Gladstone introduced to Parliament a Bill dealing with arrears. It had been the complaint of the tenants in Ireland that despite the provisions of the Act of 1881 their liability to eviction had not been lessened owing to the burden of arrears of rent which incumbered them, and they stated that large numbers of evictions on this ground were taking place. On the second reading of the Arrears Bill, Mr Gladstone admitted that the interference of the Legislature with respect to arrears of rent was exceptional and extraordinary ^ and that neither on economic nor constitutional principles could State interference by compulsion and gifts with 1 Hansard, 3rd series, cclxix. p. 1270. CHAP. XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 173 the settlement of debts be advocated^ ; but he urged in favour of the measure that it might prevent the failure'^ of one portion of the Land Act, and on the 18th of August the Arrears Act^ received the Royal Assent. This Act was confined in its operation to the tenants of holdings falling within the Act of 1881 and under the value of £30 per annum'*. Its most important provision was, that if it could be proved to the satisfaction of the Land Commission (1) that the tenant of such a holding on or before the 30th of November 1882 had paid his rent for the year ending in 1881, (2) that antecedent arrears of rent were due by him to the land- lord, and (3) that he could not discharge them without losing his holding or being deprived of the means of duly cultivating it^ an order for payment might be made by the Land Commission to or for the benefit of the landlord of one half of the arrears due (provided that the sum so paid did not exceed the yearly rent to which the holding was liable in the year preceding that ending in 1881). When the order for the payment of such a sum had been made the antecedent arrears were swept away, as also any judgment, decree or security for the rent ; whilst any judgment or decree for the recovery of the holding on the ground of non- payment of rent was vacated as far as regarded any rent due in respect of the holding before the last gale day of the year ending in 1881, but not as regarded rent which had since that date accrued due^. The difference between this Act and the arrears clause of the Act of 1881' is very marked. 1 See Annual Register, 1882, p. 80. ing as far as appeared reasonable to 2 Hansard, 3rd series, cclxix. p. the Commissioners taken into account 1274, " Without the settlement of this in considering the tenant's power of question I sorrowfully confess that paying, sec. 1, sub-sec. (2). the working of the Land Act, however ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (2) ; but if the beneficial, must remain essentially in- tenancy is sold within seven years the complete." arrears dealt with and not satisfied 2 45 & 46 Vict. c. 47. shall, to an amount not exceeding one ^ The number of tenancies in Ireland year of such arrears nor half the pro- which would fall under the limit of fits of such a sale, be a sum payable the £30 valuation was calculated at to the landlord within the meaning of 585,000. the Act of 1881. 5 45 & 46 Vict. 47, sec. 1. The sale- ' 44 & 45 yict. c. 49, sec. 59. When able value of the tenant's interest be- advances had already been made under 174 RECENT LEGISLATION. [CHAP. The money provided by the Government (and which was supplied from the Irish Church Surplus) was given not as a loan but as a free gift, enforceable by either landlord or tenant. Applications for relief under the Act* were to be made before the end of 1882^ Even when aided by the Arrears Act the Act of 1881 did not work satisfactorily; the applications under its purchase clauses were few; and discontent was widely prevalent through- out the Irish agricultural peasantry. The skilful manipulation of political agitators both fostered the existing dissatisfaction and rendered nugatory the working of the Acts. The agri- cultural returns showed increasing depression, and the panacea of a tenant proprietary was widely urged. In 1884 two measures of land purchase were proposed by Mr Barry and Mr Dickson, and though they were rejected a promise was extorted from the Government to introduce a land purchase Bill. This pledge was redeemed by the introduction of Sir George Trevelyan's' scheme of land purchase, proposing an advance of £20,000,000 from the Imperial Exchequer, of which not more than 5,000,000 was to be advanced in any one year. The Bill was based on the idea of twenty years' purchase, and provided (1) that if the tenant would pay a quarter of the purchase-money the other three-quarters should be advanced by the State at such low interest that by the payment of an annual sum, not exceeding his present rent, for forty years he would become the freeholder; while (2) if no principal sum were paid by him the whole of the purchase-money might be advanced this section the Commissioners were filed an agreement as to the fair rent empowered by sec. 15 of the Act of of a holding is filed to make an order 1882 to abolish the rent-charge on as to the accommodation of the la- proof that tenant was at the time when bourers employed on the holding the advance was made unable to dis- (sec. 3). charge the arrears. 3 Then Mr Trevelyan. When he 1 Sec. 10, but in certain cases time brought forward the Bill he stated, might be extended to April 30, 1883. " That land in Ireland was almost un- 2 Another Act of this year, the saleable, the 'block' being as great as Labourers' Cottages and Allotments it was when Sir Robert Peel passed the (Ireland) Act, 1882, 45 & 46 Vict. c. 60, Incumbered Estates Act. " Annual enabled the Land Commissioners, Register, 1884, p. 190 — 192, where the landlord and tenant had XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 175 at 5 per cent, to be paid for thirty-three years, but in this case he was obliged to satisfy the local board as to security, and a guarantee was expected out of the local cess. This Bill, the provisions of which as will be observed were of a most sweeping character, was eventually dropped; but in the following year Lord Ashbourne, the Lord Chancellor for Ireland, introduced the Purchase of Land (Ireland) Act 1885 \ It amended the purchase clauses of the Act of 1881^ by allowing an advance to the tenant of the whole purchase-money of his holding at 4 per cent.'', to run for 49 years; and the protection of a cash guarantee was obtained by the State by the Com- missioners retaining one-fifth of the money till the borrower re- paid of the whole loan a sum equal to such fifth. The sum to be advanced by the State was limited to £5,000,000, and the working of the Act was placed in the hands of the Irish Land Commission ^ Four large schemes of land purchase have therefore now been applied to Irish land with the object of enabling occupying tenants to become owners. The proposals of Mr Gladstone for drastic purchase in 1886 are both too much concerned with controversial politics and too unreal in their nature to come within the scope of this essay; but as it is evident how im- portant a feature of the land law of Ireland is concerned in the working of those purchase clauses which have actually resulted in the creation of peasant freeholders, the comparison of the working of the Irish Church Act^ the Bright clauses of the Act of 1870^ the purchase clauses of the Act of 1881'' and Lord Ashbourne's Act® is highly instructive. The following table is based on the statement made in the House of Commons on the 19th of November, 1888, by the Solicitor-General for Ireland^ : 1 48 & 49 Vict. c. 73. 44 & 45 Vict. c. 71. 2 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49. <5 33 & 34 yict. c. 46. 3 Instead of three-quarters at 5 per 7 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49. cent. 8 48 & 49 Vict. c. 73. * Power being given to appoint two ^ ^r Madden, see Hansard, 3rd new Commissioners, sec. 17. series, Vol. 330, pp. 1520—1531. 5 32 & 33 Vict. c. 42, amended by 176 RECENT LEGISLATION. [chap. No. of Purchasers. Amount advanced. 6,000 £1,674,000' 824 518,716 Land Act, 1881 731 240,554 Lord Ashbourne's Act' (1885) 8,632 5,986,000'. Act. Irish Church Act Land Act, 1870 It will be observed that Lord Ashbourne's Act has been by far the most effectual. Its success indeed was considerably greater than is shown by the above figures, since the hands of the Commissioners were tied by the limitation of the funds at their disposal, and 5,706 transactions under its provisions were still pending. The total number of agreements for purchase signed being 14,338. Two more tables, based on the same authority, will show respectively the nature of the farms already bought under this Act, and the distribution of the peasant proprietors established throughout Ireland under its provisions. 1. Nature of Farms created. Rental. No. of Holdings purchased. Underlie 3,599 Between £10 and £30 3,234 £30 and £50 884 Over £50 915 2. Distribution of Applications. Ulster . 7,711 Munster 2,730 Leinster 2,336 Connaught 1,561 From these figures it is evident that Lord Ashbourne's Act has been largely successful in inducing the tenants to purchase their holdings: and its further extension by another grant of £5,000,000, which seems certain to pass the present session of Parliament, will doubtless greatly facilitate the process \ 1 The figures in this case represent the gross amount of the purchase- money; the amount advanced would be about three-quarters of the gross amount. 2 Figures brought up to Oct. 31, 1888. 3 This sum does not represent the money which had then been actually advanced — Lord Ashbourne's Act only empowered the grant of £5,000,000 — but the sum actually advanced plus the sum which would be necessary to meet the pending transactions, 5,706 in number. 4 Since the above was written this grant has been passed by 51 & 52 Vict, c. 49. XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 177 The principle of a peasant proprietary seems now to be generally held to be the best solution of the Irish land question, and the gradual buying out of the interest of the landlords to be considered likely to benefit that country. For many years this has been the dream of not a few of those interested in Ireland, and the theory of compulsory purchase was favoured by MilP; but while expressing the opinion with much reserve, owing to the weighty authorities in favour of the scheme, the author of this essay is very doubtful of the ultimate advantages of the system. That in the immediate present it works well is true, and the tenants certainly seem to become more pros- perous and more peaceable when settled upon holdings of which they are themselves the proprietors. The banishment of capital, however, entailed by a widespread application of the scheme, and the improvident habits of the Irish peasantry (so different from those of the French small holders who are always appealed to as a triumphant example) offer fatal objections to the ultimate success of a universal plan of this kind in Ireland. The following extract from Mr Kavanagh's special report on the Bessborough Commission shows most forcibly the evil possibilities of such a plan : " Examples of the old perpetuity leases have been given us in evidence, where the lessees holding on grants for ever at a nominal rent, have been, so far as the question is practically con- cerned, in the same position as owners in fee ; and the condition of those properties now has been cited as exemplifying what the result of peasant proprietors would be, and if they can be taken as a fair example of what the result of a future experiment in that direction would result in, I think that even the most ardent advocate of that scheme would not consider it as en- couraging. By the evidence it is shown that very few of the representatives of the original lessees are now in possession ; ruined by idleness and extravagance, their grants soon passed into the hands of mortgagees, who, looking only to gain, let and sublet, divided and subdivided their lands, till over-popu- 1 See England and Ireland, J. S. fication of Ireland examined, by Lord Mill, and Mr MilVs plan for the pad- Dufferin, 1868. M. 12 178 RECENT LEGISLATION. [CHAP. lation with its consequent ills of never-ceasing want and periodical famine were stereotyped in those districts, and even in the few instances which remain of the representatives of the original lessees still continuing in possession, the condition is no better. It is shown that as occasion arose for each owner to make provision for his family, the same course was adopted, till the successive increase of each generation reduced the holdings to a size utterly inadequate to the support of those depending on them for even a bare subsistence \" The author inclines to the opinion that a sweeping measure of land purchase would be, at any rate in its ultimate result, an evil ; and is of opinion that the true solution of the diffi- culty lies rather in statutory terms such as those created under the Act of 1881. They constitute a severe inroad on the rights of the landlord, but they do not forcibly banish him from the land, nor do they compel him (as a compulsory land purchase system would do) either to retain his house and grounds while shorn 'of his estate, or to sell his demesne at something not much above prairie value. Moreover, they constitute a real approximation of law and fact, the statutory term resembling very much the nature of the tenants' assumed rights in the soil. If the country were freed from the bondage of the gigantic organization of disaffection ; if the Irish Land Acts of 1870, 1881 and 1887 were cleared of their technicalities and re- enacted in the form of one shorter and simpler Act ; and if the modes of procedure were simplified and cheapened, the author believes that the question of agricultural tenures would be on the high-road to settlement. While if public money were freely granted in aid of drainage and other improvements of the land^, and (though with caution) in the creation of a limited, solvent and industrious class of peasant proprietors, and in aid of improved provisions for emigration (free from the faults which characterized these provisions in the Act of 1881, and which the provisions inserted in the Arrears Act 1 Report of Bessborough Commis- Bills now before Parliament are ex- sion, p. 62. amples of this kind of legislation, and 2 The light railway and drainage should be widely beneficial. XII.] BECENT LEGISLATION. 179 did not satisfactorily mend*), the system would be greatly facilitated. It is impossible to say that the Act of 1881 has been tried under fair conditions, and the Act of 1887 is yet new. This latter Act^ was introduced to the House of Lords by the Earl of Cadogan^, who touched on the report presented by the Commission on the Act of 1881*, and stated that the Government was averse to again disturb more than was neces- sary the law of Irish land tenure. The provisions of the Act extended to leaseholders the advantages from which they were excluded under the Act of 1881. All such leaseholders — some 150,000 — were enabled, if they desired, to apply to the Court and to ask for a judicial revision of rent ; that is, they were placed in the same position as the tenants of 'present tenan- cies' under the Act of 1881 ^ A difference was also made in the position of middlemen, who were enabled, if the Court reduced the rents paid by their tenants, under certain cir- cumstances to give up their leases®. By the Act of 1881' a middleman who was not in occupation, and hence could not claim the protection of the Act, was frequently, while liable for his own rent, injured by his tenants having fair rents fixed as against him. This state of affairs was also prejudicial to the sub-tenants, since if the middleman made default and the head landlord proceeded by ejectment, the tenants were only able to save themselves from eviction by paying the head rent in full, and though they could then proceed against the middleman, this was not a privilege of much valued In order to stop the evictions^ which had become so pain- 1 The Act of 1881 (sec. 32) enabled ^ March 31st, 1887, see Hansard, 3rd the Land Commission to enter into series, Vol. 313, pp. 1 — 27. agreements with persons representing a ^ Lord Cowper's Commission, ap- State, Colony or public body, but the pointed 29th Sept. 1886. applications which were received did ^ 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 1. not fulfil these conditions. The Ar- « 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8. rears Act 1882 empowered Boards of ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 57. Guardians to raise money for helping « Key to the Land Act, 1887, T. M. emigration, and sanctioned grants to Healy, pp. 57, 60. them for this purpose. See Field, pp. » Whether the provisions introduced 353, 354. were likely to have this effect is rather 2 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33. doubtful, but that this was the belief 12—2 180 RECENT LEGISLATION. [CHAP. fully prevalent, the Act of 1887 contained a provision which will be better understood if the state of the then law of eject- ment is briefly considered. The tenant under a lease, or holding a yearly tenancy, was liable to eviction when one year's rent was in arrear. The fact that a judgment or decree in eject- ment had been obtained did not however get rid of the tenant's claim to his holding until such judgment or decree was actually executed ; until then, and also for six months after such execution, the tenant was able to redeem his holding if he paid the landlord's costs and the rent due\ It was there- fore necessary, in order that the six months during which the tenant had an equity of redemption might begin to run, for the landlord to proceed to actual eviction, even if the tenant was afterwards to be re-admitted as a care-taker. The provisions of the Act of 1887^^ made it sufficient for the landlord to serve notice of the judgment, and ipso facto, on receipt of the notice, the tenant became a mere care-taker without having been evicted, and the six months' period of redemption began to run. Certain equitable provisions were also inserted, enabling the County Court to give time to the tenants to help them to meet their liabilities. The Act of 1887 is but an extension of the Act of 1881, and there appears no doubt that the admission of leaseholders to the benefit of its provisions is a step in the right di- rection. Certain temporary changes in the judicial rents were also provided for. One of the recommendations of Earl Cowper's commission had been that a shorter period than fifteen years should be fixed for the revision of the judicial rents. There were many obvious disadvantages in so soon unhinging again the settlements of judicial rents which had been effected under the Act of 1881, at the same time the unforeseen and calamitous agricultural depression of 1885 and the following years, which caused even the judicial rents to be and intention of the Government was posed provision will be to reduce the stated by the Earl of Cadogan, who number of evictions by one-half." when introducing the Bill said, "I do Hansard, 3rd series. Vol. 313, p. 13. not think I am overstating the case ^ 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, sees. 52 — 71. when I say that the effect of the pro- ^ 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 7. XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 181 impossible to the tenants, rendered some action imperative. The Act of 1887 dealt with the difficulty by providing for a temporary re-adjustment of the judicial rents. The Land Commission was directed to determine the necessary change for the current year, and to take similar steps in 1888 and 1889 \ It seems probable that if an amount of social order can be introduced into Ireland sufficient to give the Act a fair trial, that it should ultimately be successful. All remedial measures which are only adopted in a crisis of social disunion are likely to be at first only slightly suc- cessful ; but it is probable that if a quieter future is in store for Ireland, the tenants will realise that they possess a security in their holdings which is quite unexampled, and that the troubled sea of Irish passions should gradually calm. Works of improvement, the increased development of the soil, and the help of State-aided emigration may all have to be called into play before the quiet level is reached, but it would seem that the basis of tenure has been satisfactorily dealt with. Surely it is no baseless hope that on the horizon is seen the dawning flush of a day of peace for Ireland; that the future holds years of happiness and prosperity when that lovely land, shaking off like a dark cloud the past of misery, blood- shed and despair, may take that place in the roll of countries which the talent, the genius, the wit and the learning of her sons so well entitle her to. 1 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 30. The end of which time the tenants will be power of varying the judicial rent was liable to the original judicial rent for only given for these three years, at the the remainder of the statutory term. LIST OF STATUTES CITED. PAGE 13 Edw. I. (Stat. West, the 2nd) 49 31 Edw. m. St. 4 51 Statute of Kilkenny, 1367 52, 53 2Kic. III. c. 8 43 10 Hen. Vn. c. 4 (Irish) 55 „ „ c. 8 (Irish) ib. „ „ c. 10 (Irish) 56 „ „ c. 18 (Irish) . . . ib. „ „ c. 22 . ib. 34 Hen. VIII. c. 28 68 12 Eliz. c. 4 (Irish) 62, 71 13 Jac. I. c. 5 (Irish) 76 ICar. I. c. 33 . 34 16 Car. 1. c. 33 ib. „ „ S.9 92 12 Car. II. c. 24 82 13 & 14 Car. II. c. 18 85 14 & 15 Car. II. c. 2 (Act of Settlement) 81 14 & 15 Car. II. sess. 4, c. 19 (Irish) 82 17 & 18 Car. H. c. 2 81 29 Car. H. c. 3 88 3 Will. & Mary c. 2 85 7 Will. III. sess. 1, c. 12 (Irish) 87 7 Will. III. c. 21 (Irish) 84 9 Will. III. c. 3 (Irish) 86 10 Will. III. c. 6 (Irish) 108 10 & 11 Will. III. c. 10 85 11 & 12 Will. III. c. 2 (Act of Eesumption) 84 2 Anne c. 3 (Irish) 86 „ c. 6 (Irish) ib. 11 Anne c. 2 sec. 6 128 5 Geo. II. 0. 4 sec. 1 (Irish) 131 LIST OF STATUTES CITED. 183 PAGE 25 Geo. II. c. 13 sec. 2 (Irish) . . . . . .- . . .131 11 & 12 Geo. III. 0. 21 (Irish) . 97 17 & 18 Geo. III. c. 49 (Irish) . . . . . . . . . i6. 21 & 22 Geo. III. c. 48 (Irish) 92 39 & 40 Geo. III. c. 67 (Act of Union) 103 56 Geo. III. c. 88 (Eviction Act 1816) 100, 131 4 Geo. IV. c. 99 sec. 35 93, 95 7 Geo. IV. c. 29 100 10 Geo» IV. c. 8 ib. 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48 (Incumbered Estates Act 1848) .... Ill, 149 sec. 2 112 13 & 14 Vict. c. 69 .101 14 & 15 Vict. c. 25 sec. 3 . 129 „ „ c. 57 sec. 73 (Civil Bills, Ireland, Act) 131 21 & 22 Vict. c. 72 (Irish Landed Estates Act 1858) 112 23 & 24 Vict. c. 153 130 „ „ sec. 36 ib. „ „ sec. 39 ib, „ ,, sec. 40 ib. „ „ sec. 44 ib. „ „ sec. 62 ib. 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154 (Act of 1860) ....... 124—134 sec. 3 127 sec. 12, 13, 14 . . . . . . . .128 sec. 17 129 sec. 40 130 sec. 51 131 sec. 52 131, 180 sec. 53 132 32 & 33 Vict. c. 42 (Irish Church Disestablishment) . . . 135, 175 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46 (Act of 1870) ib. sec. 3 . . . . 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 164 sec. 4 149, 150 „ sec. 5 151 „ sec. 6 ib. sec. 7 . . . • 149 sec. 9 . 137, 143 „ sec. 10 ......... 144 sec. 12 144, 148 sec. 13 . . •. . . . . . .145 „ sec. 14 144 sec. 15 136 sec. 20 148 sec. 32 151, 152 sec. 34 153 sec. 36 164 sec. 40 ih. 184 LIST OF STATUTES CITED. 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46 sec. 41 . . ,, „ sees. 44, 45 . „ „ sec. 69 „ ,, sec. 71 35 & 36 Vict. c. 32 sec. 1 (Act of 1872) „ „ „ sub-sec. (1) 44 cSr 45 Vict. c. 49 (Act of 1881) „ ,, sec. 1 . „ sub-sec. (1), (2), (3), (4), (6), (7), (9), (15), (16) „ sub-sec. (8), (11), (12), (13) „ sec. 2 .... ,, „ sec. 4 sub-sec. (1) ,, „ ,, sub-sec. (2) „ ,, ,, sub-sec. (3) sec. 5 ,, „ ,, sub-sec. (5) „ „ sec. 6 sec. 7 sec. 8 sub-sec. (1), (3), (5), (6), (8) ,, „ sec. 9 ,, „ sees. 10, 11, 12 . . . „ „ sec. 13 sub-sec. (1) ,, ,, „ sub-sec. (3) b . „ „ „ sub-sec. (6) „ „ „ sub-sec. (2) „ „ sec. 20 sub-sec. (4) „ „ sees. 21, 22 . „ „ sec. 24 sub-sec. (1) „ „ sec. 26 sub-sees. (1), (5) ,, „ sec. 30 sub-sec. (1) a . sec. 67 sec. 58 „ ,, sec. 59 44 & 45 Vict. c. 71 (Irish Churcla Amendment Act) 45 & 46 Vict. c. 47 (Arrears Act) sec. 1 „ „ ,, sub-sec. (2) sec. 15 45 & 46 Vict. c. 60 sec. 3 (Labourers' Cottages and Allotments 1882) .... 48 & 49 Vict. c. 73 (Lord Ashbourne's Act 1885) 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33 (Act of 1887) „ „ sees. 1, 8 „ „ sec. 7 . „ „ sec. 30 . 51 & 62 Vict. c. 49 . PAGE 151, 152 153 148 136 153 168 175 160, 161, 167 160, Ireland Act 161 162 161 162 166 163 162, 166 169 163 164 165 167 166 164 163, 165 163 167 163 167 168 lb. ib. 162, 179 160 173 175 173 ib, ib. 174 ib. 175 179 ib. 180 181 176 PATENT AND CLOSE ROLLS, ETC. 185 PATENT AND CLOSE KOLLS, ETC. PAGE Eecord 4 Edw. II . 50 Close Koll 2 Edw. Ill 44 Close EoU 15 Edw. Ill .51 Close Koll 28 Edw. Ill 44 EoU of King's Council in Ireland 16 Eic. II 92 Writ 11 Hen. Ill 49 Close Eoll 37 Hen III 44 Patent Eoll 40 Hen. Ill 49 Patent Eoll 7 Hen. IV 53 Patent Eoll 10 Hen. IV ib. Close Eoll 9 Hen. V 54 Close Eoll 7 Hen. VI ib. Close Eoll 14 Hen. VI ib. Patent and Close Eolls of Chancery in Ireland 24 & 25 Hen. VIH. . . 69 INDEX. Abolition of military tenures, 82 Absenteeism, 53, 59, 82, 92, 93, 96, 103 Adrian IV., Bull of Pope, 41 Advances to tenants , under Irish Church Act, 135, 153 (note), 175, 176; under Act of 1870, 153, 175, 176 ; under Act of 1881, 167, 168, 175, 176; under Lord Ashbourne's Act, 175, 176 Adventurers, 79, 81 Agnatic family, 3 Agrarian community, ibid. Aicill, Book of, 20 Aires, 15, 16, 18 Alexander III., Bull of Pope, 47 Alienation of land, 12, 13, 30; influence of the Church on, in early times, 13, 32 ; mode of, in the Brehon Law, 30 Anti-rent agitation, 156, 157 Arrears Act 1882, 172, 173 Ashbourne's, Lord, Act, 175 Bacon, Lord, 74 (note) Ballybetagh, 70 (note) Bank deposits, growth of, 124 Bastards, could inherit under the Bre- hon Law, 35, 41 ; could not inherit under Kentish Gavelkind, 68 Bestigi, 25 Bedford, Duke of, 96 Belfast, exports from, 156 Bessborough Commission, 127 (note), 143 (note), 157, 159 Betaghes, 26 Black rent, 53 Bo-Aires, 15, 16, 18 Bogland, reclamation of, permitted to Catholics, 97 Bonaght, 37 Bothacks, 16, 18 Boyne, battle of the, 83 Brehons, 19 ; authority of the, 20 Brehon Law, 19 ; translations of, by Commissioners, 20, 21 ; date of, 21, 22 ; resembles the laws of Wales, 22 ; not a code, 22 ; how far binding, 23 ; ambiguity of terms in, 24 ; prohibi- tion of, 52; what would have been the effect of the recognition of the, 67 Bright Clauses of the Act of 1870, 136, 151—155 Bruce, expedition of, 50 de Burgh, Bichard, receives grant of Connaught, 50 Cain Aigillne, 28 Cain Serrath, ibid. Canting of tithes, 95 Cashel, Synod of, 43 Cathal, 49 Catholic Church, power of, 113, 114 Catholics, massacre by, 77, 78; op- pressed by Penal Code, 80 Cattle, importance of, in early commu- nity, 4, 10, 11 Ceiles, 16, 18 Cess, 37 Charles II. , restoration of, 80 ; Irish Land Commission of, 81 ; abolition of knight service in the reign of, 82 Charter, Irish, 49 INDEX. 187 Chichester, Sir Arthur, 74 (note) Chief, increase in the power of the, 7 ; election of, 8, 30, 31 ; seigniory of, over the tribe-lands, 9 ; exactions by, 29, 35 — 38 ; and tenant, connec- tion of, in Brehon Law, 69 Church, relation of the, to land in the Brehon Law, 13, 14, 32 ; tenants in Brehon Law, 32 ; structure of, in Brehon Law, resembles tribe, 32, 33 Colony of the Pale, influence of the, on Brehon Law, 4; origin of the term, 55 Commendation, mental, 23, 24 Commercial Code, 84—87, 90, 95, 97 Commissions, Land, under James I., 71, 77; for making shires in 1605, 73 ; under WilHam III., 83 Commons, origin of, 33, 34 ; enclosure of, 94—96 Compensation, for disturbance, 137, 138, 142—149, 163, 164; for im- provements, see Improvements Connaught, surrender of two-thirds of, by Cathal to John, 49 ; granted to Richard de Burgh, ibid. ; composition of, 62 ; scheme of plantation in, 77 Constantine, forged donation of, 41 (note) Contract, basis of Act of 1860, 126— 128 ; freedom of, impossible in Ire- land, 126, 127; mercantile system of, under Act of 1860, 133, 134 Copyhold, 90—92 Cork, claims to lands in, in reign of Elizabeth, 60 Corus Bescna, 21 Coshering, 27, 29, 37, 43 Cottrell, John, 37 (note) de Courcy, 48 Courts Baron, 44 (note), 92 Court of Claims, 81 Cowper, Earl, Land Commission of, 179, 180 Coyne, 27, 29, 43, 82 Crith Gabhlach, 20 Cromer, Archbishop of Armagh, 59 (note) Cromwell, character of his Irish wars, 59 ; settlement of Ireland under, 78, 80 ; conquest of Ireland by, 78, 79 Cuddies, 37 Customary tenures, absence of, 26 Daer tenancy, 10 ; riiles of, 28 — 30 Davels, Henry, 60 Davies, Sir John, 24, 67, 70—72, 80, 89 ; abolition of Irish tenures by, 67 et seq. Deirbhfine, 25 Deis lands, 24, 25 Dergfine, 26 (note) Desmond, Sir John, 60 ; revolt of Earl of, 60 Devon Commission, 107 (note), 118, 121 (note), 136 Dibad, 25 Disgavelling of Irish land, 73 et seq. Distress, 10, 98, 99, 131 Disturbance, compensation for, see Compensation Drogheda, Statute of, 55 Druids, 19 Druim Gall, 21 Dufferin, Lord, 19 (note) Duthaig-fine, 25 Earth-tillers, treatment of, under Crora- wellian Settlement, 80, 89, 90 Edgecombe, Sir Richard, 55 Edward IV., policy of, towards de- generate lords, 51 Ejectment, caused by political motives, 94 ; remedy by, 131, 132, 163, 164, 179, 180 EHzabeth, character of Irish wars of, 69 ; dealings with Irish land in early part of reign of, 60, 71 Emigration, 97, 110, 121 Eric composition, 36, 43 Escheat in relation to Gavelkind, 73 Eviction Act 1816, 100, 107, 131 (note) Exactions by Chief, 29, 35, 38; had their origin in increase of Fuidhir tenants, 38 188 INDEX. Family group, nature of, 3, 4, 5 ; rela- tion of, to the land, 4, 5 Famine, of 1739, 99 ; of 1846, 108—110 Fair rent, 165 Fenianism, 110, 113 Feudal tenures, introduction of, 40, 41; swept away by Act of 1860, 127, 128 Fine, 5 Fine Flatha, 17, 18 Fines on renewal of lease, 96 Fitz Thomas, 37 (note) Fixed tenancies, 166 Fixtures, removable, law of, under Acts of 1851 and 1860, 129 Flaths, 15, 16, 18 Forfeitures from adherents of James n., 83 Fostering, 51, 52 (note) Franchise, elective, denied to Papists, 85 ; effect of nature of, on tenancies, 94, 99, 100, 107 Free sale, provisions for, under Act of 1881, 160, 161 Free trade in land, 124—134 Freeholds, growth of, from political motives, 100, 104 French Code, compared to Act of 1860, 133, 134 Fuidhirs, origin of class, 9 ; Saer and Daer, 17, 18 Gavelkind, Case of, 35 ; Irish, 6, 7, 35 ; judgment in the Case of, 67, 68 ; Kentish, difference from Irish, 68; Welsh, ibid. Geraldines, 47, 59 Gilleninny, 37 Gillycone, ibid. Grad Feine, 18 ; Flath, ibid. Grattan, 97 Grazing farms, 93 Hanging gale, 105 Hearts of Steel, 96 Henry II., agreement of, with Strong- bow, 42; early designs on Ireland, ibid. ; lands in Ireland, 43 ; holds Curia Kegis at Lismore, ibid. ; grant of the English laws by, ibid. ; Irish policy of, 46, 47; large grants of land by, 44, 48; makes Treaty of Windsor, 46; makes John King of Ireland, 47 Henry III., feudal grants by, 49 Henry IV., state of Ireland in reign of, 53 Henry V., indifference of, towards Ire- land, 53, 64 Henry VI., state of Ireland in reign of, 51 Henry VII., policy of, towards Ireland, 55, 56 Henry VIII., policy of, 58, 59; state of Ireland in reign of, 57, 58 Houghers, 94 House of Lords, Select Committee of, 169 (note), 170 Hy Neill, 31 larfine, 25 Improvements, Brehon Law of, 128; law of, under Act of 1860, 128, 130; compensation for, under Act of 1870, 149, 151; under Act of 1881, 161, 162, 164 Incumbered Estates Act, 111 — 113, 125, 137, 149; landlords under, 124; purchasers under, 125 Indfine, 25 India, joint family in, 3 Insurrection and massacre by Catho- lics, 77, 78 Irish Church Act, 135, 153 (note) James I., Land Commissions in reign of, 71, 75; conciliatory tone of legis- lation of, 76 James II., policy of, towards Ireland, 82, 83; heads Catholic party in Ireland, 83 John, made King of Ireland, 47 ; goes to Ireland, 48; feudal grants by, ibid. ; agreement of, with Cathal, 49; visits Ireland for second time, ibid. INDEX. 189 Joint family of India, 3 Judicial rents, 165. 180. 181 Kernetty, 37 Kilkenny, Statute of, 52 Kinship, as basis of early community, 3,6 de Lacy, Hugh, obtains grant of Meath, 44 Land, arable, 24, 34, 35; bonds, 79; free trade in, 124; League, 157; measures, Irish, 70 (note) ; pasture, 24, 33, 34 ; relation of mere Irish to the, after Cromwell's conquest, 89 ; system, earliest form of, 3, 4 Land Act 1870, 134—155; objects of, 136; faults of, 138, 139, 145, 147, 153—155 Land Act 1881, 156—171; law of im- provements under, 161, 164; statu- tory terms, 162, 163; compensation for disturbance, 163 ; regulations as to fair rent, 165 ; fixed tenancies, 166 ; equitable power of Court, 167 ; advances under, 167, 168 ; purchase clauses of, 168, 170 Land Act 1887, 178, 179 Landed Estates Act, 112, 134 Landholding classes in early times, 15—18 Landlord and Tenant Law Amend- ment Act (Ireland) 1860, 124—134 Leases, became unpopular with land- lords, 100, 101, 105; refused to settlers, 87 ; refused to Catholics, 86 ; judicial, 166, 171 Levellers, 34, 95 Licenses, 43 (note), 53 (note) Limerick, Treaty of, 83 Livery, 27, 29 Livery of seisin, 87 London Companies as landowners, 126 (note) Mac Bryan, Murrough, 69 Mac Murrough, Dermot, 42 Manaich tenants, 32 Manorial system, how tried in Ireland, 91,92 Manufactures, Irish, repression of, 84, 85, 90, 93; increase of, 98 Meath, ancient appanage of Irish Koyalty, 42 ; granted to Hugh de Lacy, 44 Mensal lands, 10, 30, 31 Merchant Navigation Act 1663, 85 Middlemen, 82, 93, 96, 98, 124, 148, 179 Mortuath, 18 Mosyorowne, 37 Mountjoy, 63 Munster, desolation of, after Desmond war, 60; enclosure of commons in, 94 ; plantation of, 60, 61 ' No rent' agitation, 172 Notices to quit, 127, 132, 163 Oak boys, 96 O'Callaghan, Cahir, 69 O'Connell, 107, 118 O'Connor, Roderick, King of Con- naught, 42 ; makes Treaty of Wind- sor with Henry II., 46 O'Donnell, revolt of, 62, 63 O'Neil, Hugh, Earl of Tyrone, revolt of, 62 ; forfeiture of estates of, 63, 73 Orkney, Lady, 84 (note) Ormonde, Earl of, 92 Ownership, changes in nature of, 7 Oxford, Council at, 47 Palatine counties, grants of, 45, 92 Pandarus, 59 (note) Papists, disabilities heaped on, 86 Parliament, Grattan's, 98; Papists prevented from sitting in, 85 Peel, Sir Eobert, 118 Penal Code, 86, 87, 90, 95 Pembroke, Richard de Clare, Earl of, see Strongbow Petition, to Edward I. from Colonists of the Pale, 50; to Henry V. from Colonists of the Pale, 54 Petty, Sir William, 79, 80, 89, 90 100 INDEX. Placita Kolls, 50 (note) Plantation of Munster, 60, 61 ; Ulster, 63, 64, 73—75 Population, increase of, 102, 103 Potato, effect of cultivation of, 99, 103 ; famine, 108—110 Potkyn's Case, 105 Poyning's Law, 55 Property in land, at first vested in the Community, 3 ; mere usufruct by in- dividual, ibid. ; Gavelkind rules of, 6 ; power of the chief as affecting, 8 ; rules of Tanistry as affecting, ibid. Protestants, massacre of, in 1641, 77, 78 Purchase, land, schemes of, 174, 177, 178 Purchases, under Incumbered Estates Act, 125; under Irish Church Act, 135, 153 (note), 175, 176; under Act of 1870, 151—155, 175, 176; under Act of 1881, 168, 170, 175, 176; under Lord Ashbourne's Act, 175, 176 Kaj, mode of succession to the, 31 Kefections, 29, 37 Reformation, efforts of Henry VIII. to introduce the, into Ireland, 59 Eent, origin of, 11 Rents, raised by competition, 93, 94; in Scotland and England, compared with Ireland, 142 Resumption Act, 84 Ri, the, 18, 25, 28 Ribbonmen, 109, 110 Richard II. visits Ireland, 53 Richmond Commission, 157, 158 Roman Catholics, influence of, absent, 3 Runrig, 6 Saer tenancy, 10, 11; rules of, 28, 29 Salisbury, Earl of, 70 'Salus Populi ' of Pandarus, 59 (note) Sanction, want of, in Brelion Law, 19, 20 Satellitum poturae, 37 (note) Savings Banks, 156 Secret societies, 102 Senchus Mor, 20, 21 Sencleiths, 16, 18 Separate property in land, not known in early times, 3 ; favoured by Brehon lawyers, 7 Sept, 5, 35 Services of Ceile tenants, 28 Settlement, Acts of, 81; repealed at Dublin, 83; effect of the, on native small holders, 90 Sexual relations in early Irish history, 11 Sheep breeding, 93 Shragh and mart, 37 (note) Simnel, 55 Slaves, 15 Sorohen, 37 South, ibid. Spenser, 36 (note) Statutes, English, how applied to Ire- land, 52 Statutory terms, 162, 163, 178 Stock, rules for amount of, 29 Strafford, Earl of, 77 Strongbow, lands in Ireland, 42; con- quests of, 42 Suffolk, Earl of, 71 (note) Talbot, Sir John, expedition of, 53 (note) Tanaist, 8; election of, ibid. Tanistry, ibid. ; final abolition of, 67, 69 Taurcrech, 25 Tenancy at will fostered by Penal and Commercial Codes, 87, 90 Tenant-right, in Ulster, 117—123; de- finition of, 119 ; value of, ibid. ; League, 122 Tenants at will, native race reduced to, 90; no growth of customary rights in case of, in Ireland, 90, 91 ; origin and growth of, 105, 106 Tenant's view of his rights in the land, 133 Tenants, favourable position of under-, Acts of 1870 and 1881, 171 Tenure and Improvement of Land (Ireland) Act, 130 INDEX. 191 Tenures, Feudal, introduction of, 40 ; substitution of English for Irish, 67 et seq.; influenced by political mo- tives, 94, 99, 101, 104, 105, 107 Termon lands, 24, 31 Three F's, the, 159 Tithe Agistment Act, 93 (note) Tithe farmers, 95 Tithes, ihid. Tribal group, nature of the, 5 Tribal territory, divisions of, in early community, 6, 24 Tribe, early Irish, 5; social division of, 15, 18 Tribe-land, pasturage, 24, 33, 34; arable, 24, 34, 35 Trinoda necessitas, the, 44 Tuath, 18, 24 Tyrconnel, Earl of, forfeiture by, 63, 73 Tyrone, Earl of, 62 Ulster, not subdued by Henry II. , 46 ; theoretical confiscation of, in reign of Elizabeth, 60 ; plantation of, 63, 64 ; scheme of plantation, 74, 75 ; prosperity of settlers in, 64, 117 Ulster Custom, origin of, 73, 93, 117, 119, 220 ; nature of, 117—123, 140, 141; faults of, 121, 123; not suit- able for legal enforcement through- out Ireland, 122, 123 ; as affected by Act of 1870, 139—142; as affected by Act of 1881, 162 ; reported on by Devon Commission, 119; reported on by Bessborough Commission, 159 Union, passing of the, 102, 103 United Irishmen, 102 Villein tenures, growth of, in England, 91 Wales, laws of, 22 Warbeck Plots, 55 Wards and Liveries, Court of, 82 (note) Wentworth (Earl of Strafford), 62, 77, 78 Whiteboys, 96 William III. landed in England, 83 Windsor, Treaty of, 46 Women, not entitled to inherit under Brehon Law, 35 Worcester, Philip of, 48 Yearly tenancies, origin and growth of, 105 Young Ireland risings, 113 UNIVERSITY cambbidge: printed by c. j. clay, m.a. and sons, at the university press. University Press, Cambridge March, 1890 CATALOGUE OF WO RKS PUBLISHED FOR THE SYNDICS OF THE Camijrtlrse ^nibersitp ^ress. Uontion: c j. clay and sons, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. GLASGOW: 263, Argyle Street. CamtJriUge: DEIGHTON, BELL AND CO. ILnpjifl: F. A. BROCKHAUS. 14/3/90 PUBLICATIONS OF W\)t Camijritige Bntbersttp ^ress, THE REVISED VERSION OF THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS. TJke Revised Version is the Joint Property of the Universities of Oxford a7id Camby-idge, ( The Cambridge &^ Oxford Editions are uniform in Type, Size, &^ Price.) The following Editions of the Revised Version of the Holy Bible and New Testament have been already published and may be had in a great variety of cloth and leather bindings of all booksellers. THE HOLY BIBLE. N.B. The Pearl i67no., the Ruby i6mo., and the Minion Svo., a7c facsimile editions and correspond page for page with each other. Cheap edition for tise in Schools. I. Pearl type, i6mo. prices from i/6 2. Ruby type, i6mo. do. 4/6 3. Minion type, 8vo. do. 7/6 A large type edition in- one vohime. 4. Small Pica type. Imperial 8vo. prices from 18/- LIBRARY EDITIONS. In five vols., or the Old Testament only, in four volumes. 5. Pica type. Demy 8vo. 5 vols., prices from £2 6. Pica type, Demy 8vo. Old Testament only, 4 vols., do. ^i. \2s. 7. Pica type. Royal 8vo. 5 vols., do. ^3. 7.s. 6d. 8. Pica type, Royal 8vo. Old Testament only, 4 vols., do. £2. los. THE PARALLEL BIBLE. Being the Authorised Version arranged in Parallel columns with the Revised Version. 9. Minion type. Crown 4to. prices from 18/- 10. Minion type, Crown 4to. thin India paper, prices from £1. lis. 6d. THE BOOK OF PSALMS. ' II. Long Primer type, 8vo. prices from i/- Londo7i : C. J. Cla v &^ Sons, Ca77ibridge University Press Warchoiise, Ave Maria. Lane. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS BOOKS. 3 THE REVISED VERSION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. Cheap editions for use in Schools. 1. Nonpareil type, 321110. prices from -/6 2. Brevier type, i6mo. do. i/- 3. Long Primer type, 8vo. do. 1/6 LIBRARY EDITIONS. 4. Pica type, Demy 8vo. prices from 8/- 5. Pica type. Royal 8vo. do. 12/6 THE PARALLEL NEW TESTAMENT. Giving the Authorised and Revised Versions side by side. 6. Pearl type, i6mo. (Pocket Edition) prices from 1/6 7. Minion type, 8vo. do. 4/6 8. Long Primer type, 4to. do. 7/6 STUDENT'S LARGE PAPER EDITION. 9. Minion type. Crown 4to. prices from 10/6 All Editions of the Parallel New Testament correspond page for page with each other. THE NEW TESTAMENT AND PSALMS. 10. Long Primer type, 8vo. prices from 2/6 THE PARALLEL NEW TESTAMENT, Greek and English. The Greek Text edited by the Rev. F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., LL.D., and printed on alternate pages with the English Parallel Minion Edition of the Revised Version. Minion type, Crown 8vo. prices from 12/6 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN GREEK, according to the Text followed in .the Authorised Version with the variations adopted in the Revised Version. Edited by the Rev. F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., LL.D. Crown 8vo. prices from 6/- Specimens of type and size of pages with prices sent on application. London : C, J. Cla v ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. I — 2 PUBLICATIONS OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, &c. THE CAMBRIDGE PARAGRAPH BIBLE of the Au- thorized English Version, with the Text Revised by a Collation of its Early and other Principal Editions, the Use of the Italic Type made uniform, the Marginal References remodelled, and a Critical Intro- duction prefixed, by F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., LL.D., Editor of the Greek Testament, Codex Augiensis, &c., and one of the Revisers of the Authorized Version. Crown 4to. gilt. 7.\s. From the Times. literature of the subject, by such workers as "Students of the Bible should be particu- Mr Francis Fry and Canon Westcott, appeal larly grateful (to the Cambridge University to a wide range of sympathies; and to these Press) for having produced, with the able as- may now be added Dr Scrivener, well known sistance of Dr Scrivener, a complete critical for his labours in the cause of the Greek Testa- edition of the Authorized Version of the Eng- ment criticism, who has brought out, for the lish Bible, an edition such as, to use the words Syndics of the Cambridge University Press, of the Editor, 'would have been executed long an edition of the English Bible, according to ago had this version been nothing more than the text of 1611, revised by a comparison with the greatest and best known of English clas- later issues on principles stated by him in his sics.' Falling at a time when the formal revi- Introduction. Here he enters at length into sion of this version has been undertaken by a the history of the chief editions of the version, distinguished company of scholars and divines, and of such features as the marginal notes, the the publication of this edition must be con- use of italic type, and the changes of ortho- sidered most opportune." graphy, as well as into the most interesting Yroxa.\h^Athen(Eum. question as to the original texts from which "Apart from its religious importance, the our translation is produced." English Bible has the glory, which but few From the London Quarterly Review. sister versions indeed can claim, of being the "The work is worthy in every respect of the chief classic of the language, of having, in editor's fame, and of the Cambridge University conjunction with Shakspeare, and in an im- Press. The noble English Version, to which measurable degree more than he, fixed the our country and religion owe so much, was language beyond any possibility of important probably never presented before in so perfect a change. Thus the recent contributions to the form." THE CAMBRIDGE PARAGRAPH BIBLE. Student^s Edition, on good writing paper ^ with one column of print and wide margin to each page for MS. notes. This edition will be found of great use to those who are engaged in the task of Biblical criticism. Two Vols. Crown 4to. gilt. 31^. dd. THE AUTHORIZED EDITION OF THE ENGLISH BIBLE (1611), ITS SUBSEQUENT REPRINTS AND MO- DERN REPRESENTATIVES. Being the Introduction to the Cambridge Paragraph Bible (1873), re-edited with corrections and additions. By F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D., Pre- bendary of Exeter and Vicar of Hendon. Crown 8vo. "js. 6d. THE LECTIONARY BIBLE, WITH APOCRYPHA, divided into Sections adapted to the Calendar and Tables of Lessons of 1871. Crown 8vo. 3^. 6d. THE NEW TESTAMENT IN GREEK according to the text followed in the Authorised Version, with the Variations adopted in the Revised Version. Edited by F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D. Crown 8vo. 6s. Morocco boards or limp. 12s. The Revised Version is the Joint Property of the Universities of Cambridge aiid Oxford. BREVIARIUM ROMANUM a Francisco Cardinali QuiGNONiO editum et recognitum iuxta editionem Venetiis a.d. 1535 impressam curante JOHANNE WiCKHAM Legg Societatis Anti- quariorum atque Coll, Reg. Medicorum Londin. Socio. Demy 8vo. lis. Londofi '. C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse.^ Ave Maria Lane, THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 5 BREVIARIUM AD USUM INSIGNIS ECCLESIAE SARUM. Juxta Editionem maximam pro Claudio Chevallon ET Francisco Regnault a.d. mdxxxi. in Alma Parisiorum Academia impressam : labore ac studio Francisci Procter, A.M., ET Christophori Wordsworth, A.M. Fasciculus I. In quo continentur Kalendarium, et Ordo Temporalis sive Proprium de Tempore totius anni, una cum ordinali suo quod usitato vocabulo dicitur Pica sive DiRECTORiUM Sacerdotum. Demy 8vo. i8s. " The value of this reprint is considerable to usually necessitated a visit to some public liturgical students, who will now be able to con- library, since the rarity of the volume made its suit in their own libraries a work absolutely in- cost prohibitory to all but a few." — Literary dispensable to a right understanding of the his- Churchman. tory of the Prayer- Book, but which till now Fasciculus II. In quo continentur Psalterium, cum ordinario Officii totius hebdomadae juxta Horas Canonicas, et proprio Com- pletorii, LiTANiA, Commune Sanctorum, Ordinarium Missae CUM Canone et XIII Missis, &c. &c. Demy 8vo. \7.s. "Not only experts in liturgiology, but all "Cambridge has worthily taken the lead persons interested in the history of the Anglican with the Breviary, which is of especial value Book of Common Prayer, will be grateful to the for that part of the reform of the Prayer- Book Syndicate of the Cambridge University Press for which will fit it for the wants of our time." — forwarding the publication of the volume which Church Quarterly Review. bears the above t\\X^."— Notes and Queries. Fasciculus III. In quo continetur Proprium Sanctorum quod et sanctorale dicitur, una cum accentuario. Demy 8vo. \^s. *^* An Introduction of 130 pages, prefixed to this volume, contains (besides other interesting information as to the Breviary and its contents) Mr Bradshaw's exhaustive lists of editions and copies of the Breviary and allied liturgical books. Fasciculi I. II. III. complete, £2. 2s. GREEK AND ENGLISH TESTAMENT, in parallel Columns on the same page. Edited by J. Scholefield, M.A. Small Odlavo. New Edition, with the Marginal References as arranged and revised by Dr SCRIVENER. Cloth, red edges. 7^. dd. GREEK AND ENGLISH TESTAMENT. The Stu- dent's Edition of the above, on large writing paper. 4to. \is. GREEK TESTAMENT, ex editione Stephani tertia, 1550. Small 8vo. 3J. dd. THE PARALLEL NEW TESTAMENT, GREEK AND ENGLISH, being the Authorised Version set forth in 1611 arranged in Parallel Columns with the Revised Version of 188 1, and with the original Greek, as edited by F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D. Crown 8vo. I2J. (id. The Revised Version is the Joint Property of the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford. THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES, with Notes and In- troduction. By the Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D., Dean of Wells. Large Paper Edition. Demy 8vo. Ts. 6d. London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. PUBLJCATJONS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT IN GREEK ACCORDING TO THE SEPTUAGINT. Edited by H. B. Swete, D.D Honorary Fellow of Gonville and Caius College. Vol. I. Genesis — IV Kings. Crown 8vo. Js. 6d. Volume II. By the same Editor. \Tn the Press. " Der Zweck dieser Ausgabe, den ganzen Bezuglich der Accente und Spiritus der Eigen- in den erwahnten Hss. vorliegenden kritischen namen sind die Herausg. ihre eigenen Wege Stoff iibersichtlich zusammenzustellen und dem gegangen." — Deutsche Litteraturzeitiing. Beniitzer das Nachschlagen in den Separat- ..a^, t^ ,-,• i i .. j • ..u ausgaben jener Codices zu ersparen, ist hier , \ ^^ ^r n °"u^ -^ ^^^" executed in the very in compendiosester Weise vortreffllch erreicht. ^^^^ ^'^'^ ^^ Cambridge accuracy, which has no Bezuglich der Klarheit, Schonheit und Cor- f^^T^lZr^^l^^ ^^t n/ldlLTfor^^n ,a rectheit des Drucks gebQrt der Ausgabe das ^^ "^^ ^^^^'^^ "^^ ''■''^ ""^ ^'^'^'^"^ ^^"^ ""^""^^ hochste Lob. Da zugleich der Preis sehr nic ^^^^. —Academy. drig gestellt ist, so ist zu hoffen und zu wiin- "An edition, which for ordinary purposes schen, dass sie auch aufserhalb des englischen will probably henceforth be that in use by Sprachkreises ihre Verbreitung finden werde. readers of the Septuagint." — Guardian. THE BOOK OF PSALMS IN GREEK ACCORDING TO THE SEPTUAGINT, being a portion of Vol. II. of the above. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW in Anglo-Saxon and Northumbrian Versions, synoptically arranged: with Collations exhibiting all the Readings of all the MSS. Edited by the Rev. W. W. Skeat, Litt.D., Elrington and Bosworth Pro- fessor of Anglo-Saxon. New Edition. Demy 4to. los. " By the publication of the present volume for the scholarly and accurate way in which he Prof. Skeat has brought to its conclusion a has performed his laborious task. Thanks to work planned more than a half century ago by him we now possess a reliable edition of all the the late J. M. Kemble. .. Students of English existing MSS. of the old English Gospels." — have every reason to be grateful to Prof. Skeat Academy. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK, uniform with the preceding, by the same Editor. Demy 4to. \os. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE, uniform with the preceding, by the same Editor. Demy 4to. \os. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN, uniform with the preceding, by the same Editor. Demy 4to. \os. " The Gospel according to St John, in ticular volume now before us, we can only say Atiglo-Saxon and Northumbrian Versions: it is worthy of its two predecessors. We repeat completes an undertaking designed and com- that the service rendered to the study of Anglo- menced by that distinguished scholar, J. M. Saxon by this Synoptic collection cannot easily Kemble, some forty years ago. Of the par- be overstated." — Contemporary Review. THE FOUR GOSPELS (as above) bound in one volume, price 30i', THE POINTED PRAYER BOOK, being the Book of Common Prayer with the Psalter or Psalms of David, pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches. Royal 24mo. \s. 6d. The same in square 32mo, cloth. 6^. THE CAMBRIDGE PSALTER, for the use of Choirs and Organists. Specially adapted for Congregations in which the " Cam- bridge Pointed Prayer Book" is used. Demy 8vo. cloth extra, y. 6d. cloth limp, cut flush. 2s. 6d. London : C. J. Cla y fir» Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 7 THE PARAGRAPH PSALTER, arranged for the use of Choirs by Brooke Foss Westcott, D.D., Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Cambridge. Fcap. 4to. ^s. The same in royal 32mo. Cloth \s. Leather \s. 6^. THE MISSING FRAGMENT OF THE LATIN TRANS- LATION OF THE FOURTH BOOK OF EZRA, discovered, and edited with an Introduction and Notes, and a facsimile of the MS., by Robert L. Bensly, M.A., Lord Almoner's Professor of Arabic. Demy 4to. \os. "It has been said of this book that it has Bible we understand that of the larger size added a new chapter to the Bible, and, startUng which contains the Apocrypha, and if the as the statement may at first sight appear, it is Second Book of Esdras can be fairly called a no exaggeration of the actual fact, if by the part of the Apocrypha."— 6'a/«rfl?rtj' if ^z/r^w. THE HARKLEAN VERSION OF THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS, Chap. xi. 28— xiii. 25. Now edited for the first time with Introduction and Notes on this Version of the Epistle. By Robert L. Bensly, M.A. Demy 8vo. 5^. NOTITIA CODICIS QUATTUOR EVANGELIORUM Grseci Membranacei viris doctis hucusque incogniti quem in museo suo asservat Eduardus Reuss Argentoratensis. 2s. THE ORIGIN OF THE LEICESTER CODEX OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. By J. Rendel Harris, M.A. With 3 plates. Demy 4to. \os. 6d. THE REST OF THE WORDS OF BARUCH : A Christian Apocalypse of the Year 136 A. D. The Text revised with an Introduction. By J. Rendel Harris, M.A. Royal 8vo. 5^. CODEX S. CEADDAE LATINUS. Evangelia SSS. Matthaei, Marci, Lucae ad cap. Ill, 9 complectens, circa septimum vel octavum saeculum scriptvs, in Ecclesia CathedraH Lichfieldiensi servatus. Cum codice versionis Vulgatae Amiatino contulit, pro- legomena conscripsit, F. H. A. Scrivener, A.M., D.C.L., LL.D., With 3 plates. £i- is. THEOLOaY-(ANCIENT). THE GREEK LITURGIES. Chiefly from original Autho- rities. By C. A. SWAINSON, D.D., late Master of Christ's College, Cambridge. Crown 4to. Paper covers, i ^s. •'Jeder folgende Forscher wird dankbar Griechischen Liturgien sicher gelegt hat."— anerkennen, dass Swainson das Fundament zu Adolph Harnack, Theologische Literatnr einer historisch-kritischen Geschichte der Zeitung. London : C. % Cla y «Sr» SoNS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane, 8 PUBLICATIONS OF THEODORE OF MOPSUESTIA'S COMMENTARY ON THE MINOR EPISTLES OF S. PAUL. The Latin Ver- sion with the Greek Fragments, edited from the MSS. with Notes and an Introduction, by H. B. Swete, D.D. In Two Volumes. Volume I., containing the Introduction, with Facsimiles of the MSS., and the Commentary upon Galatians — Colossians. Demy 8vo. \2s. " It is the result of thorough, careful, and ster Sachkenntniss sein Werk mit alien den- patient investigation of all the points bearing jenigen Zugaben ausgeriistet, weiche bei einer on the subject, and the results are presented solchen Text-Ausgabe nur irgend erwartet with admirable good sense and modesty." — werden konnen. . . . Von den drei Haupt- Guardian. handschriften . . , sind vortreffliche photo- " In dem oben verzeichneten Buche liegt graphische Facsimile's beigegeben, wie iiber- uns die erste Halfte einer vollstandigen, ebenso haupt das ganze Werk von der University sorgfaltig gearbeiteten wie schon ausgestat- Press zu Cambridge mit bekannter Eleganz teten Ausgabe des Commentars mit ausfiihr- ausgestattet ist." — Tkeologische Literaturzei- lichen Prolegomena und reichhaltigen kritis- tung. chen und erlauternden Anmerkungen vor." — " Hernn Swete's Leistung ist cine so Literarisches Centralblatt. tiichtige dass wir das Werk in keinen besseren "Auf Grund dieser Quellen ist der Text Handen wissen mochten, und mit den sich- bei Swete mit musterhafter Akribie herge- ersten Erwartungen auf das Gelingen der stellt. Aber auch sonst hat der Herausgeber Fortsetzung entgegen sehen." — Gottingische mit unermiidlichem Fleisse und eingehend- gelekrte A fizeigen {Sept. 1881). Volume II., containing the Commentary on i Thessalonians — Philemon, Appendices and Indices. 12s. "Eine Ausgabe . . . fiir weiche alle zugang- (Sept. 23, 1882). lichen Hiilfsmittel in musterhafter Weise be- "Mit derselben Sorgfalt bearbeitet die wir niitzt wurden . . . eine reife Frucht siebenjahri- bei dem ersten Theile geriihmt haben." — gen Fleisses." — Tkeologische Literaturzeitung Literarisches Centralblatt (^}v\y 29, 1882). SAYINGS OF THE JEWISH FATHERS, comprising Pirqe Aboth and Pereq R. Meir in Hebrew and English, with Cri- tical and Illustrative Notes. By Charles Taylor, D.D., Master of St John's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. loj. "The 'Masseketh Aboth' stands at the "A careful and thorough edition which does head of Hebrew non-canonical writings. It is credit to English scholarship, of a short treatise of ancient date, claiming to contain the dicta from the Mishna, containing a series of sen- of teachers who flourished from B.C. 200 to the tences or maxims ascribed mostly to Jewish same year of our era. Mr Taylor's explana- teachers immediately preceding, or immediately tory and illustrative commentary is very full following the Christian era. . ." — Contempo- and satisfactory." — Spectator. rary Review. A COLLATION OF THE ATHOS CODEX OF THE SHEPHERD OF HERMAS. Together with an Introduction by Spyr. p. Lambros, Ph. D., translated and edited with a Preface and Appendices by J. Armitage Robinson, M.A., Fellow and Dean of Christ's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 3^. 6d. THE PALESTINIAN MISHNA. By W. H. LoWE, M.A., Lecturer in Hebrew at Christ's College, Cambridge. Royal 8vo. 21J. SANCTI IREN^I EPISCOPI LUGDUNENSIS libros quinque adversus Hsereses, versione Latina cum Codicibus Claro- montano ac Arundeliano denuo collata, prasmissa de placitis Gnos- ticorum prolusione, fragmenta necnon Graece, Syriace, Armeniace, commentatione perpetua et indicibus variis edidit W. Wigan Harvey, S.T.B. CoUegii Regalis olim Socius. 2 Vols. 8vo. iSs. M. MINUCII FELICIS OCTAVIUS. The text revised from the original MS., with an English Commentary, Analysis, Intro- du(5lion, and Copious Indices. Edited by H. A. Holden, LL.D. Examiner in Greek to the University of London. Crown Svo. 7s. 6d. London : C. J. Cla v &^ Sons, Cambridge Uftiversity Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. g THEOPHILI EPISCOPI ANTIOCHENSIS LIBRI TRES AD AUTOLYCUM edidit, Prolegomenis Versione Notulis Indicibus instruxit G. G. Humphry, S.T.B. Post 8vo. 5^. THEOPHYLACTI IN EVANGELIUM S. MATTH^I COMMENTARIUS, edited by W. G. Humphry, B.D. Prebendary of St Paul's, late Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. js. dd. TERTULLIANUS DE CORONA MILITIS, DE SPEC- TACULIS, DE IDOLOLATRIA, with Analysis and English Notes, by George Currey, D.D. Preacher at the Charter House, late Fellow and Tutor of St John's College. Crown 8vo. 5^. FRAGMENTS OF PHILO AND JOSEPHUS. Newly edited by J. Rendel Harris, M.A., Fellow of Clare College, Cambridge. With two Facsimiles. Demy 4to. 12s. 6d. THE TEACHING OF THE APOSTLES. Newly edited, with Facsimile Text and Commentary, by J. Rendel Harris, M.A. Demy4to. ^i. is. THEOLOGY— (ENGLISH). WORKS OF ISAAC BARROW, compared with the Ori- ginal MSS., enlarged with Materials hitherto unpublished. A new Edition, by A. Napier, M.A. 9 Vols. Demy 8vo. ^3. 3^. TREATISE OF THE POPE'S SUPREMACY, and a Discourse concerning the Unity of the Church, by Isaac Barrow. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. PEARSON'S EXPOSITION OF THE CREED, edited by Temple Chevallier, B.D. New Edition. Revised by R. Sinker, D.D., Librarian of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. 12s. "A new edition of Bishop Pearson's famous College Altogether this appears to be the work On the Cr^^^ has just been issued by the most complete and convenient edition as yet Cambridge University Press. It is the well- published of a work which has long been re- known edition of Temple Chevallier, thoroughly cognised in all quarters as a standard one." — overhauled by the Rev. R. Sinker, of Trinity Guardian. AN ANALYSIS OF THE EXPOSITION OF THE CREED written by the Right Rev. John Pearson, D.D. late Lord Bishop of Chester, by W. H. Mill, D.D. Demy 8vo. 5^. WHEATLY ON THE COMMON PRAYER, edited by G. E. CORRIE, D.D. late Master of Jesus College. Demy 8vo. 7 j. dd. TWO FORMS OF PRAYER OF THE TIME OF QUEEN ELIZABETH. Now First Reprinted. Demy 8vo. dd. C^SAR MORGAN'S INVESTIGATION OF THE TRINITY OF PLATO, and of Philo Judsus, and of the effe^s which an attachment to their writings had upon the principles and reasonings of the Fathers of the Christian Church. Revised by H. A. ' ' " Crown 8vo. 4^. London : C. y. Cla y &^ SoNS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Ma7'ia Lane. 1 — 5 lo PUBLICATIONS OF SELECT DISCOURSES, by John Smith, late Fellow of Queens' College, Cambridge. Edited by H. G. Williams, B.D. late Professor of Arabic. Royal 8vo. ^s. 6d. "The 'Select Discourses' of John Smith, no spiritually thoughtful mind can read them collected and published from his papers after unmoved. They carry us so directly into an his death, are, in my opinion, much the most atmosphere of divine philosophy, luminous considerable work left to us by this Cambridge with the richest lights of meditative genius... School [the Cambridge Platonists]. They have He was one of those rare thinkers in whom a right to a place in English literary history." largeness of view, and depth, and wealth of — Mr Matthew Arnold, in the Contevipo- poetic and speculative insight, only served to rary Review. evoke more fully the religious spirit, and while "Of all the products of the Cambridge he drew the mould of his thought from Plotinus, School, the 'Select Discourses' are perhaps he vivified the substance of it from St Paul."— the highest, as they are the most accessible Principal Tulloch, Rational Theology in and the most widely appreciated... and indeed England in the ijth Century. THE HOMILIES, with Various Readings, and the Quo- tations from the Fathers given at length in the Original Languages. Edited by the late G. E. Corrte, D.D. Demy 8vo. yj. 6^. DE OBLIGATIONE CONSCIENTI..E PR.ELECTIONES decern Oxonii in Schola Theologica habitas a Roberto Sanderson, SS. Theologiae ibidem Professore Regio. With English Notes, including an abridged Translation, by W. Whewell, D.D. late Master of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. 'js. 6d. ARCHBISHOP USHER'S ANSWER TO A JESUIT, with other Trafls on Popery. Edited by J. Scholefield, M.A. late Regius Professor of Greek in the University. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. WILSON'S ILLUSTRATION OF THE METHOD OF explaining the New Testament, by the early opinions of Jews and Christians concerning Christ. Edited by T. Turton, D.D. 8vo. 5^. LECTURES ON DIVINITY delivered in the University of Cambridge, by John Hey, D.D. Third Edition, revised by T. Turton, D.D. late Lord Bishop of Ely. 2 vols. Demy Svo. 15^. S. AUSTIN AND HIS PLACE IN THE HISTORY OF CHRISTIAN THOUGHT. Being the Hulsean Lectures for 1885. By W. Cunningham, D.D. Demy 8vo. Buckram, 12s. 6d. CHRIST THE LIFE OF MEN. The Hulsean Lectures for 1888. By the Rev. H. M. Stephenson, M.A. Crown Svo. 2s. 6d. THE GOSPEL HISTORY OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE REVISED VERSION, arranged in a Connected Narrative, especially for the use of Teachers and Preachers. By Rev. C. C. James, M.A., Rector of Wortham, Suffolk, and late Fellow of King's College. Crown 8vo. Zs. 6d. ARABIC, SANSKRIT, SYRIAC, &c. THE DIVYAvADANA, a Collection of Early Buddhist Legends, now first edited from the Nepalese Sanskrit MSS. in Cambridge and Paris. By E. B. COWELL, M.A., Professor of Sanskrit in the University of Cambridge, and R. A. Neil, M.A., Fellow and Lecturer of Pembroke College. Demy 8vo. 18^. Lo?idojt : C. y. Cla y 6-» SONS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane, THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. ii POEMS OF BEHA ED DIN ZOHEIR OF EGYPT. With a Metrical Translation, Notes and Introduction, by E. H. Palmer, M.A., Barrister-at-Law of the Middle Temple, late Lord Almoner's Professor of Arabic, formerly Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge. 2 vols. Crown 4to. Vol. I. The Arabic Text. ios. dd. Vol. II. English Translation. \os. 6d. "We have no hesitation in saying that in remarked, by not unskih'ul imitations of the both Prof. Palmer has made an addition to Ori- styles of several of our own favourite poets, ental literature for which scholars should be living and dead." — Saturday Review. grateful; and that, while his knowledge of "This sumptuous edition of the poems of Arabic is a sufficient guarantee for his mastery Beha-ed-din Zoheir is a very welcome addition of the original, his English compositions are to the small series of Eastern poets accessible distinguished by versatility, command of Ian- to readers who are not Orientalists." — Aca- guage, rhythmical cadence, and, as we have demy. THE CHRONICLE OF JOSHUA THE STYLITE, com- posed in Syriac A.D. 507, with an English translation and notes, by the late W. Wright, LL.D., Professor of Arabic. Demy 8vo. los. 6d. " Die lehrreiche kleine Chronik Josuas hat ein Lehrmittel fur den syrischen Unterricht ; es nach Assemani und Martin in Wright einen erscheint auch gerade zur rechten Zeit, da die dritten Bearbeiter gefunden, der sich um die zweite Ausgabe von Roedigers syrischer Chres- Emendation des Textes wie um die Erklarung tomathie im Buchhandel vollstandig vergrifFen der Realien wesentlich verdient gemacht hat und diejenige von Kirsch-Bernstein nur noch . . . Ws. Josua-Ausgabe ist eine sehr dankens- in wenigen Exemplaren vorhanden ist." — werte Gabe und besonders empfehlenswert als Deutsche Litteraturzeitung. KALILAH AND DIMNAH, OR, THE FABLES OF BIDPAI ; being an account of their literary history, together with an EngHsh Translation of the same, with Notes, by I. G. N. Keith- Falconer, M.A., late Lord Almoner's Professor of Arabic in the University of Cambridge. Demy 8vo. js. 6d. NALOPAkHYANAM, or, the tale of NALA; containing the Sanskrit Text in Roman Characters, followed by a Vocabulary and a sketch of Sanskrit Grammar. By the late Rev. Thomas Jarrett, M.A. Trinity College, Regius Professor of Hebrew. Demy 8vo. los. NOTES ON THE TALE OF NALA, for the use of Classical Students, by J. Peile, Litt.D., Master of Christ's College. Demy 8vo. 12s. CATALOGUE OF THE BUDDHIST SANSKRIT MANUSCRIPTS in the University Library, Cambridge. Edited by C. Bendall, M.A., Fellow of Gonville and Caius College. Demy 8vo. 1 2 J. " It is unnecessary to state how the com- those concerned in it on the result . . . Mr Ben- pilation of the present catalogue came to be dall has entitled himself to the thanks of all placed in Mr Bendall's hands; from the cha- Oriental scholars, and we hope he may have racter of his work it is evident the selection before him a long course of successful labour in was judicious, and we may fairly congratulate the field he has chosen."— Atheneeum. THE HISTORY OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT, being the Syriac version of the Pseudo-Callisthenes. Edited from Five Manuscripts, with an EngHsh Translation and Notes, by E. A. W. Budge, M.A., Assistant in the Department of Egyptian Antiquities, British Museum. Demy 8vo. 2^s. {The Edition is limited to 250 copies.) London: C. J. Clay &=> Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse ^ Ave Maria Lane. 1—6 12 PUBLICATIONS OF GREEK AND LATIN CLASSICS, &c. SOPHOCLES: The Plays and Fragments, with Critical Notes, Commentary, and Translation in English Prose, by R. C. Jebb, Litt.D., LL.D., Regius Professor of Greek in the University of Cambridge. Parti. Oedipus Tyrannus. DemySvo. New Edition. 12s. 6d. Part II. Oedipus Coloneus. Demy 8vo. New Edition. \2s. 6d. Part III. Antigone. Demy 8vo. 12s. 6d. Part IV. Philoctetes. {In the Press. "Of his explanatory and critical notes we "Prof. Jebb's keen and profound sympathy, can only speak with admiration. Thorough not only with Sophocles and all the best of scholarship combines with taste, erudition, and ancient Hellenic life and thought, but also with boundless industry to make this first volume a modern European culture, constitutes him an pattern of editing. The work is made com- ideal interpreter between the ancient writer plete by a prose translation, upon pages alter- and the modern reader." — Athencetim. nating with the text, of which we may say " It would be difficult to praise this third in- shortly that it displays sound judgment and stalment of Professor Jebb's unequalled edition taste, without sacrificing precision to poetry of of Sophocles too warmly, and it is almost a expression." — The Times. work of supererogation to praise it at all. It is "Professor Jebb's edition of Sophocles is equal, at least, and perhaps superior, in merit, already so fully established, and has received to either of his previous instalments ; and when such appreciation in these columns and else- this is said, all is said. Yet we cannot refrain where, that we have judged this third volume from formally recognising once more the con- when we have said that it is of a piece with summate Greek scholarship of the editor, and the others. The whole edition so far exhibits from once more doing grateful homage to his perhaps the most complete and elaborate edit- masterly tact and literary skill, and to his un- orial work which has ever appeared." — Satur- wearied and marvellous industry." — Spectator, day Review. AESCHYLI FABULAE.— IKETIAES XOHOOPOI IN LIBRO MEDICEO MENDOSE SCRIPTAE EX VV. DD. CONIECTURIS EMENDATIUS EDITAE cum Scholiis Graecis et brevi adnotatione critica, curante F. A. Paley, M.A., LL.D. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. THE AGAMEMNON OF AESCHYLUS. With a Trans- lation in English Rhythm, and Notes Critical and Explanatory. New Edition Revised. By the late Benjamin Hall Kennedy, D.D., Regius Professor of Greek. Crown 8vo. 6^-. "One of the best editions of the masterpiece of Greek txa.g&Ay."— At henceum. THE THE^TETUS OF PLATO with a Translation and Notes by the same Editor. Crown 8vo. ys. 6d. ARISTOTLE.— nEPI >FTXHX. ARISTOTLE'S PSY- CHOLOGY, in Greek and English, with Introduction and Notes, by Edwin Wallace, M.A., late Fellow and Tutor of Worcester College, Oxford. Demy 8vo. i8j. "The notes are exactly what such notes "Wallace's Bearbeitung derAristotelischen ought to be,— helps to the student, not mere Psychologic ist das Werk eines denkenden und displays of learning. By far the more valuable in alien Schriften des Aristoteles und grossten- parts of the notes are neither critical nor lite- teils auch in der neueren Litteratur zu densel- rary, but philosophical and expository of the ben belesenen Mannes . . . Der schwachste thought, and of the connection of thought, in Teil der Arbeit ist der kritische . . . Aber in the treatise itself In this relation the notes are alien diesen Dingen liegt auch nach der Ab- invaluable. Of the translation, it may be said sicht des Verfassers nicht der Schwerpunkt that an English reader may fairly master by seiner Arbeit, sondern. "— Prof. Susemihl in means of it this great treatise of Aristotle."— Philologische Wochenschrift. Spectator. London : C. J. Clav &^ Sons, Camdrid^e University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 13 ARISTOTLE.— nEPl A1KA102TNHX. THE FIFTH BOOK OF THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS OF ARISTOTLE. Edited by Henry Jackson, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 6j. "II is not too much to say that some of the will hope that this is not the only portion of points he discusses have never had so much the Aristotelian writings which he is likely to light thrown upon them before. . . . Scholars edit." — Athenceum. ARISTOTLE. THE RHETORIC. With a Commentary by the late E. M. Cope, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, re- vised and edited by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. With a biographical Memoir by the late H. A. J. MUNRO, Litt.D. 3 Vols., Demy 8vo. Now reduced to 21^. [originally p2iblished at 31 j-. dd) "This work is in manyways creditable to the "Mr Sandys has performed his arduous University of Cambridge. If an English student duties with marked ability and admirable tact. wishes to have a full conception of what is con- In every part of his work — revising, tained in the ^A^^<7r/c of Aristotle, to Mr Cope's supplementing, and completing— he has done edition he must go." — Academy. exceedingly well." — Examiner. PINDAR. OLYMPIAN AND PYTHIAN ODES. With Notes Explanatory and Critical, Introductions and Introductory Essays. Edited by C. A. M. Fennell, Litt. D., late Fellow of Jesus College. Crown 8vo. 9^-. "Mr Fennell deserves the thanks of all clas- his author, great industry, a sound judgment, sical students for his careful and scholarly edi- and, in particular, copious and minute learning tion of the Olympian and Pythian odes. He in comparative philology." — Athenceum. brings to his task the necessary enthusiasm for THE ISTHMIAN AND NEMEAN ODES. By the same Editor. Crown 8vo. 9^. "... As a handy and instructive edition of valuable help to the study of the most difficult a difficult classic no work of recent years sur- of Greek authors, and is enriched with notes passes Mr Fennell's 'Pindar.'" — Athejiceum. on points of scholarship and etymology which "This work is in no way inferior to could only have been written by a scholar of the previous volume. The commentary affords very high attainments." — Saturday Review. DEMOSTHENES. PRIVATE ORATIONS OF, with In- troductions and English Notes, by the late F. A. Paley, M.A. and J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Fellow and Tutor of St John's College, and Public Orator in the University of Cambridge. Part I. Contra Phormionem, Lacritum, Pantaenetum, Boeotum de Nomine, Boeotum de Dote, Dionysodorum. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 6j. "Mr Paley's scholarship is sound and literature which bears upon his author, and accurate, his experience of editing wide, and the elucidation of matters of daily life, in the if he is content to devote his learning and delineation of which Demosthenes is so rich, abilities to the production of such manuals obtains full justice at his hands. . . . We as these, they will be received with gratitude hope this edition may lead the way to a more throughout the higher schools of the country. general study of these speeches in schools 'Mr Sandys is deeply read in the German than has hitherto been Tpossihle."— Academy. Part II. Pro Phormione, Contra Stephanum I. II.; Nicostra- tum, Cononem, Calliclem. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. " It is long since we have come upon a work mosthenes '." — Saturday Review. evincing more pains, scholarship, and varied " the edition reflects credit on research and illustration than Mr Sandys's Cambridge scholarship, and ought to be ex- contribution to the 'Private Orations of De- tensively used." — At/ieneeum. DEMOSTHENES. SPEECH AGAINST THE LAW OF LEPTINES. With Introduction, Critical and Explanatory Notes and Autotype Facsimile from the Paris MS. Edited by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Demy 8vo. 9^. London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. 14 PUBLICATIONS OF DEMOSTHENES AGAINST ANDROTION AND AGAINST TIMOCRATES, with Introductions and English Com- mentary, by William Wayte, M.A., late Professor of Greek, Uni- versity College, London. Crown 8vo, "js. 6d. "These speeches are highly interesting, as they are worthy of all admiration . . . Besides illustrating Attic Law, as that law was in- a most lucid and interesting introduction, Mr fluenced by the exigences of politics ... As Wayte has given the student effective help vigorous examples of the great orator's style, in his running comm^nidixy."— Spectator. PLATO'S PH^DO, literally translated, by the late E. M. Cope, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, revised by Henry Jackson, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. 5^. P. VERGILI MARONIS OPERA, cum Prolegomenis et Commentario Critico edidit B. H. Kennedy, S.T.P., Extra Fcap. 8vo. 3J. 6d. THE BACCHAE OF EURIPIDES. With Introduction, Critical Notes, and Archaeological Illustrations, by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. New and Enlarged Edition. Crown 8vo. 12s. 6d. " Ofthe present edition ofthe^acc//:^^ by Mr "The volume is interspersed with well- Sandys we may safely say that never before has executed woodcuts, and its general attractive- a Greek play, in England at least, had fuller ness of form reflects great credit on the Uni- justice done to its criticism, interpretation, versity Press. In the notes Mr Sandys has more and archaeological illustration, whether for the than sustained his well-earned reputation as a young student or the more advanced scholar. careful and learned editor, and shows consider- The Cambridge Public Orator may be said to able advance in freedom and lightness of style, have taken the lead in issuing a complete edi- , . . Under such circumstances it is superfluous tion of a Greek play, which is destined perhaps to say that for the purposes of teachers and ad- to gain redoubled favour now that the study of vanced students this handsome edition far sur- ancient monuments has been applied to its il- passes all its predecessors."— A tAenceum. lustration. " — Saturday Review. THE TYPES OF GREEK COINS. By Percy Gardner, Litt. D., F.S.A. With 16 Autotype plates, containing photographs of Coins of all parts of the Greek World. Impl. 4to. Cloth extra, ^i. \\s. 6d.', Roxburgh (Morocco back), £2. 2s. "Professor Gardner's book is written with be distinctly recommended to that omnivorous such lucidity and in a manner so straightfor- class of readers — 'men in the schools'." — Sa- ward that it may well win converts, and it may turday Review. ESSAYS ON THE ART OF PHEIDIAS. By C. Wald- STEIN, Litt. D., Phil. D., Reader in Classical Archaeology in the University of Cambridge. Royal 8vo. With numerous Illustrations. 16 Plates. Buckram, 30^-. " His book will be universally welcomed as " 'E.ssays on the Art of Pheidias' form an a very valuable contribution towards a more extremely valuable and important piece of thoroughknowledgeof the style of Pheidias." — work. . . . Taking it for the illustrations alone. The Academy. it is an exceedingly fascinating book." — Times. AN INTRODUCTION TO GREEK EPIGRAPHY. Part I. The Archaic Inscriptions and the Greek Alphabet by E. S. Roberts, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of Gonville and Caius College. Demy 8vo. With illustrations. \Zs. " We will say at once that Mr Roberts ap- notices bearing on each document. Explana- pears to have done his work very well. The tory remarks either accompany the text or are book is clearly and conveniently arranged. added in an appendix. To the whole is pre- The inscriptions are naturally divided accord- fixed a sketch of the history of the alphabet up ing to the places to which they belong. Under to the terminal date. At the end the result is each head are given illustrations sufficient to resumed in general tables of all the alphabets, show the characteristics of the writing, one classified according to their connexions; and a copy in letters of the original form (sometimes separate table illustrates the alphabet of Athens. a facsimile) being followed by another in the The volume contains about five hundred in- usual cursive. References, which must have scriptions, and forms a moderate octavo of about cost great labour, are given to the scattered four hundred pages." — Saturday Revie-iv. London : C. J. Cla v dr' Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 15 M. TULLI CICERONIS AD M. BRUTUM ORATOR. A revised text edited with Introductory Essays and with critical and explanatory notes, by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Demy 8vo. i6j. "This volume, which is adorned with " A model edition ." — Spectator. several good woodcuts, forms a handsome and "The commentary is in every way worthy welcome addition to the Cambridge editions of of the editor's high reputation." — Academy. Cicero's works.'' — Athettceum. M. TULLI CICERONIS DE FINIBUS BONORUM ET MALORUM LIBRI QUINQUE. The text revised and explained ; with a Translation by James S. Reid, Litt. D., Fellow and Tutor of Gonville and Caius College. 3 Vols. [/« the Press. Vol. III. Containing the Translation. Demy 8vo. Zs. M. T. CICERONIS DE OFFICIIS LIBRI TRES, with Mar- ginal Analysis, English Commentary, and copious Indices, by H. A. HoLDEN, LL.D. Sixth Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Cr. 8vo. qj. "Few editions of a classic have found so position of the work secure." — American much favour as Dr Holden's De Officiis, and Journal of Philology. the present revision (sixth edition) makes the M. T. CICERONIS DE OFFICIIS LIBER TERTIUS, with Introduction, Analysis and Commentary, by H. A. HOLDEN, LL.D. Crown 8vo. is. M. TVLLI CICERONIS PRO C RABIRIO [PERDVEL- LIONIS REO] ORATIO AD QVIRITES, with Notes, Introduc- tion and Appendices by W. E. Heitland, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of St John's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. "js. 6d. M. TULLII CICERONIS DE NATURA DEORUM Libri Tres, with Introduction and Commentary by JOSEPH B. Mayor, M.A., together with a new collation of several of the English MSS. by J. H. SWAINSON, M.A. Vol. I. Demy 8vo. loi". 6d. Vol. II. 12s. 6d. Vol. III. los. " Such editions as that of which Prof Mayor way admirably suited to meet the needs of the has given us the first instalment will doubtless student . . . The notes of the editor are all that do much to remedy this undeserved neglect. It could be expected from his well-known learn- is one on which great pains and much learning ing and scholarship." — Academy. have evidently been expended, and is in every See also Pitt Press Series, pp. 30 — 34. MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCE, &c. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PAPERS. By Sir W. Thomson, LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., Professor of Natural Phi- losophy in the University of Glasgow. Collected from different Scientific Periodicals from May 1841, to the present time. Vol. I. Demy 8vo. \Zs. Vol. 11. 15^". [Volume III. In the Press. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PAPERS, by Sir G. G. Stokes, Sc.D., LL.D., F.R.S., Lucasian Professor of Mathe- matics in the University of Cambridge. Reprinted from the Original Journals and Transactions, with Additional Notes by the Author. Vol.1. DemySvo. i^s. Vol.11. 15J. [Vol. III. I tt the Press. London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cmnbridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria La7ie. 1 6 PUBLICATIONS OF A HISTORY OF THE THEORY OF ELASTICITY AND OF THE STRENGTH OF MATERIALS, from Galilei to the present time. Vol. I. Galilei to Saint- Venant, 1639-1850. By the late I. TODHUNTER, Sc.D., F.R.S., edited and completed by Professor Karl Pearson, M.A. Demy 8vo. 25^. Vol. II. By the same Editor. \In the Press. THE ELASTICAL RESEARCHES OF BARRE DE SAINT- VENANT (Extract from Vol. II. of Todhunter's History of the Theory of Elasticity), edited by Professor Karl Pearson, M.A. Demy 8vo. 9^. A TREATISE ON GEOMETRICAL OPTICS. By R. S. Heath, M.A., Professor of Mathematics in Mason Science College, Birmingham. Demy 8vo. 12s. 6d. AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON GEOMETRICAL OPTICS. By R. S. Heath, M.A. Crown 8vo. 5^. A TREATISE ON ELEMENTARY DYNAMICS. By S. L. LONEY, M.A., Fellow of Sidney Sussex College. Crown 8vo. js. 6d. A TREATISE ON PLANE TRIGONOMETRY. By E. W. HOBSON, M.A., Fellow and Lecturer of Christ's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. [In the Press. CATALOGUE OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS COMPILED BY THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON: Vols. 1—6 for the years 1800 — 1863, Royal 4to. cloth (vol. i in half morocco) £\ (net); half morocco ^5. ^s. (net). Vols. 7—8 for the years 1864— 1873, cloth ;^i. \\s. 6d. (net); half morocco ^2. 5^-. (net). Single volumes cloth 20s. or half-morocco 2^s. (net). New Series for the years 1 8 74— 1883. [In the Press. THE COLLECTED MATHEMATICAL PAPERS OF ARTHUR CAYLEY, Sc.D., F.R.S., Sadlerian Professor of Pure Mathematics in the University of Cambridge. Demy 4to. 10 vols. Vols. I. and II. 25^-. each. IVol. III. In the Press. THE SCIENTIFIC PAPERS OF THE LATE PROF. J. CLERK MAXWELL. Edited by W. D. Niven, M.A. In 2 vols. Royal 4to. [Nearly ready. A HISTORY OF THE STUDY OF MATHEMATICS AT CAMBRIDGE. By W. W. RouSE Ball, M.A., Fellow and Lecturer on Mathematics of Trinity College, Cambridge. Crown 8vo. 6s. A TREATISE ON ANALYTICAL STATICS, by E. J. ROUTH, Sc.D., F.R.S., Fellow of the University of London, Honorary Fellow of St Peter's College, Cambridge. [In the Press. A CATALOGUE OF THe' PORTSMOUTH COL- LECTION OF BOOKS AND PAPERS written by or belonging to Sir Isaac Newton. Demy 8vo. 5^-. A TREATISE ON NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. By Sir W. Thomson, LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., and P. G. Tait, M.A. Parti. Demy 8vo. ids. Part II. Demy 8vo. 18^-. London : C. y. Cla v &■= Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 17 ELEMENTS OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. By Pro- fessors Sir W. Thomson and P. G. Tait. Demy 8vo. 9^-. An elementary TREATISE on QUATERNIONS. By P. G. Tait, M.A. yd Edition. Enlarged. Demy 8vo. \Zs. AN ATTEMPT TO TEST THE THEORIES OF CAPILLARY ACTION, by FRANCIS Bashforth, B.D., and J. C. Adams, M.A., F.R.S. Demy 4to. ^i. \s. A REVISED ACCOUNT OF THE EXPERIMENTS MADE WITH THE BASHFORTH CHRONOGRAPH to find the Resistance of the Air to the Motion of Projectiles, with the application of the Results to the Calculation of Trajectories accord- ing to J. Bernoulli's method by Francis Bashforth, B.D. [Neaf'ly ready. A TREATISE ON THE THEORY OF DETERMI- NANTS and their applications in Analysis and Geometry, by R. F. Scott, M.A., Fellow of St John's College. Demy 8vo. 12s. HYDRODYNAMICS, a Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of the Motion of Fluids, by H. Lamb, M.A. Demy 8vo. 12s. THE ANALYTICAL THEORY OF HEAT, by Joseph Fourier. Translated, with Notes, by A. Freeman, M.A., formerly Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 12s. PRACTICAL WORK AT THE CAVENDISH LABORA- TORY. HEAT. Edited by W. N. Shaw, M.A. Demy 8vo. y. THE ELECTRICAL RESEARCHES OF THE Hon. H. Cavendish, F.R.S. Written between 177 1 and 178 1. Edited from the original MSS. in the possession of the Duke of Devonshire, K. G., by the late J. Clerk Maxwell, F.R.S. Demy 8vo. iSs. COUNTERPOINT. A Practical Course of Study, by the late Professor Sir G. A. Macfarren, M.A., Mus. Doc. New Edition, revised. Crown 4to. 7s. 6d. A TREATISE ON THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CHEMISTRY, by M. M. Pattison Muir, M.A. Second Edition. Demy 8vo. 15^. "The value of the book as a digest of the Lothar Meyer; but in this country the student historical developments of chemical thought has had to content himself with such works as is immense." — Acadeiny. Dr Tilden's ' Introduction to Chemical Philo- *' Theoretical Chemistry has moved so rapidly sophy', an admirable book in its way, but rather of late years that most of our ordinary text slender. Mr Pattison Muir having aimed at a books have been left far behind. German more comprehensive scheme, has produced a students, to be sure, possess an excellent guide systematic treatise on the principles of chemical to the present state of the science in ' Die philosophy which stands far in advance of any Modernen Theorien der Chemie' of Prof. kindred work in our language." — AthencBum. ELEMENTARY CHEMISTRY. By M. M. Pattison Muir, M.A., and Charles Slater, M.A., M.B. Crown 8vo. 4-$-. dd. PRACTICAL CHEMISTRY. A Course of Laboratory Work. By M. M. Pattison Muir, M.A., and D. J. Carnegie, B.A. Crown 8vo. y. NOTES ON QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS. Concise and Explanatory. By H. J. H. Fenton, M.A., F.I.C., Demonstrator of Chemistry in the University of Cambridge. Cr. 4to. New Edition, ds. London : C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria. Lane. 18 PUBLICATIONS OF LECTURES ON THE PHYSIOLOGY OF PLANTS, by S. H. Vines, Sc.D., Professor of Botany in the University of Oxford. Demy 8vo. With Illustrations, lis. "To say that Dr Vines' book is a most In erudition it stands alone among English valuable addition to our own botanical litera- books, and will compare favourably with any ture is but a narrow meed of praise : it is a foreign competitors." — Natnre. work which will take its place as cosmopolitan : "The work forms an important contribu- no more clear or concise discussion of the diffi- tion to the literature of the subject.. ..It will be cult chemistry of metabolism has appeared eagerly welcomed by all students." — Academy. A SHORT HISTORY OF GREEK MATHEMATICS. By J. Gow, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. los. 6d. DIOPHANTOS OF ALEXANDRIA; a Study in the History of Greek Algebra. By T. L. Heath, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. " This study in the history of Greek Algebra "The most thorough account extant of an exceedingly valuable contribution to the Diophantus's place, work, and critics." — history of mathematics. " — A cadeniy. A thenceum. THE MATHEMATICAL WORKS OF ISAAC BAR- ROW, D.D. Edited by W. Whewell, D.D. Demy Svo. -js. 6d. THE FOSSILS AND PAL^ONTOLOGICAL AFFIN- ITIES OF THE NEOCOMIAN DEPOSITS OF UPWARE AND BRICKHILL with Plates, being the Sedgwick Prize Essay for 1879. By the late W. Keeping, M.A. Demy Svo. los. 6d. THE BALA VOLCANIC SERIES OF CAERNAR- VONSHIRE AND ASSOCIATED ROCKS, being the Sedgwick Prize Essay for 1888 by A. Harker, M.A., F.R.S., Fellow of St John's College. Demy Svo. js. 6d. A CATALOGUE OF BOOKS AND PAPERS ON PRO- TOZOA, CCELENTERATES, WORMS, and certain smaller groups of animals, published during the years 1S61 — 1SS3, by D'Arcy W. Thompson, M.A. Demy Svo. 12s. 6d. ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS made at the Obser- vatory of Cambridge by the late Rev. J. Challis, M.A. from 1846 to i860. ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS from 1861 to 1865. Vol. XXI. Royal 4to. 153-. From 1866 to 1869. Vol. XXII. Royal 4to. 15^-. A CATALOGUE OF THE COLLECTION OF BIRDS formed by the late H. E. Strickland, now in the possession of the University of Cambridge. By O. Salvin, M.A. Demy Svo. £i.is. A CATALOGUE OF AUSTRALIAN FOSSILS, Strati- graphically and Zoologically arranged, by R. Etheridge, Jun., F.G.S. Demy Svo. 10s. 6d. ILLUSTRATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ANATOMY, VERTEBRATE AND INVERTEBRATE, for the Use of Stu- dents in the Museum of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy. Second Edition. Demy Svo. 2s. 6d. London : C, £, Cla y &^ SoNS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 19 A CATALOGUE OF THE COLLECTION OF CAM- BRIAN AND SILURIAN FOSSILS contained in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge, by J. W. Salter, F.G.S. With a Portrait of PROFESSOR Sedgwick. Royal 4to. ^s. dd. CATALOGUE OF OSTEOLOGICAL SPECIMENS con- tained in the Anatomical Museum of the University of Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 2s, 6d. LAW. ELEMENTS OF THE LAW OF TORTS. A Text-book for Students. By Melville M. Bigelow, Ph.D., Lecturer in the Law School of the University of Boston, U.S.A. Crown 8vo. ios.6d. " It is based on the original American edition, showing great grasp of subject ... A very full but it is an English Text-book with English index enhances the value of this book, which authorities; and statutes and illustrations sub- should take a prominent place among the really stituted very generally for the American . . . The trustworthy text-books for the use of students." — style is easy and lucid, though condensed, Law Thnes. A SELECTION OF CASES ON THE ENGLISH LAW OF CONTRACT. By Gerard Brown Finch, M.A., of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law. Royal 8vo. 28^. "An invaluable guide towards the best method of legal study." — Law Quarterly Revieiv. THE INFLUENCE OF THE ROMAN LAW ON THE LAW OF ENGLAND. Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 1884. By T. E. SCRUTTON, M.A. Demy 8vo. io.y. dd. "Legal work of just the kind that a learned University should promote by its prizes."— - Law Quarterly Review. LAND IN FETTERS. Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 1885. By T. E. SCRUTTON, M.A. Demy 8vo. -js. 6d. COMMONS AND COMMON FIELDS, OR THE HIS- TORY AND POLICY OF THE LAWS RELATING TO COMMONS AND ENCLOSURES IN ENGLAND. Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 1886. By T. E. SCRUTTON, M.A. los. 6d. HISTORY OF THE LAW OF TITHES IN ENGLAND. Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 1887. By W. Easterby, B.A., LL.B., St John's College and the Middle Temple. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. HISTORY OF LAND TENURE IN IRELAND. Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 1888. By W. E. Montgomery, M.A., LL.M. Demy 8vo. los. 6d. AN ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY. By E. C. Clark, LL.D,, Regius Professor of Civil Law in the University of Cam- bridge, also of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law. Crown 8vo. js. 6d. PRACTICAL JURISPRUDENCE, a Comment on Austin. By E. C. Clark, LL.D. Crown 8vo. 9^. "Damit schliesst dieses inhaltreiche und tical Jurisprudence."— Konig. C^«^»-«/3/a^Jf/«r nach alien Seiten anregende Buch iiber Prac- Rechtswissenschaft. London : C. J. Cla v ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. 20 PUBLICATIONS OF A SELECTION OF THE STATE TRIALS. By J. W. Willis-Bund, M.A., LL.B., Professor of Constitutional Law and History, University College, London. Crown 8vo. Vols. I. and IT, In 3 parts. Now reduced to 30i-. {originally published at 46^-.) "This work is a very useful contribution to growth and development of the law of treasofk, that importdnt branch of the constitutional his- as it may be gathered from trials before the tory of England which is concerned with the ordinary courts."— The Academy. THE FRAGMENTS OF THE PERPETUAL EDICT OF SALVIUS JULIANUS, collected, arranged, and annotated by Bryan Walker, iVL.A., LL.D.,late Law Lecturerof St John's College, and Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Crown 8vo. 6^. " In the present book we have the fruits of such a student will be interested as well as per- the same kind of thorough ;ind well-ordered haps surprised to find how abundantly the ex- study which was brought to bear upon the notes tant fragments illustrate and clear up points to the Commentaries and the Institutes . . . which have attracted his attention in the Com- Hitherto the Edict has been almost inac- mentaries, or the Institutes, or the Digest." — cessible to the ordinary English student, and Law Times. BRACTON'S NOTE BOOK. A Collection of Cases de- cided in the King's Courts during the reign of Henry the Third, annotated by a Lawyer of that time, seemingly by Henry of Bratton. Edited by F. W. Maitland of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law, Downing Professor of the Laws of England. 3 vols. Demy 8vo. Buckram. ^3. 3^-. Net. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF JUS- TINIAN'S DIGEST. Containing an account of its composition and of the Jurists used or referred to therein. By Henry John ROBY, M.A., formerly Prof, of Jurisprudence, University College, London. Demy 8vo. gs. JUSTINIAN'S DIGEST. Lib. VII., Tit. I. De Usufructu, with a Legal and Philological Commentary. By H. J. ROBY, M.A. Demy 8vo. 9^". Or the Two Parts complete in One Volume. Demy 8vo. i^s. "Not an obscurity, philological, historical, whose decisions and arguments constitute its or legal, has been left unsifted. More inform- substance. Nowhere else can a clearer view ing aid still has been supplied to the student of be obtained of the personal succession by which the Digest at large by a preliminary account, the tradition of Roman legal science was sus- covering nearly 300 pages, of the mode of tained and developed. " — The Times. composition of the Digest, and of the jurists THE COMMENTARIES OF GAIUS AND RULES OF ULPIAN. With a Translation and Notes, by J. T. Abdy, LL.D., Judge of County Courts, late Regius Professor of Laws in the University of Cambridge, and the late Bryan Walker, M.A., LL.D., New Edition by Bryan Walker. Crown 8vo. i6s. " As scholars and as editors Messrs Abdy way of reference or necessary explanation, and Walker have done their work well . . , For Thus the Roman jurist is allowed to speak for one thing the editors deserve special commen- himself, and the reader feels that he is really dation. They have presented Gaius to the studying Roman law in the original, and not a reader with few notes and those merely by fanciful representation of it." — Athenceum. THE INSTITUTES OF JUSTINIAN, translated with Notes by J. T. Abdy, LL.D., and the late Bryan Walker, M.A., LL.D. Crown 8vo. i6s. "We welcome here a valuable contribution the ordinary student, whose attention is dis- to the study of jurisprudence. The text of the tracted from the subject-matter by the dif- Institutes is occasionally perplexing, even to ficulty of struggling through the language in practised scholars, whose knowledge of clas- which it is contained, it will be almost indis- sical models does not always avail them in peusable." — Spectator. dealing with the technicalities of legal phrase- "The notes are learned and carefully com- ology. Nor can the ordinary dictionaries be piled, and this edition will be found useful to expected to furnish all the help that is wanted. students." — Law Times. This translation will then be of great use. To Loftdon : C.J . Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridg-e University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 21 SELECTED TITLES FROM THE DIGEST, annotated by the late B. Walker, M.A., LL.D. Part I. Mandati vel Contra. Digest XVII. I. Crown 8vo. 5^. Part II. De Adquirendo rerum dominio and De Adquirenda vel amittenda possessione. Digest XLI. i and 11. Crown 8vo. 6^. Part III. De Condictionibus. Digest xii. i and 4 — 7 and Digest XIII. I — 3. Crown 8vo. 6s. GROTIUS DE JURE BELLI ET PACIS, with the Notes of Barbeyrac and others ; accompanied by an abridged Translation of the Text, by W. Whewell, D.D. late Master of Trinity College. 3 Vols. Demy 8vo. lis. The translation separate, 6j. HISTORICAL WORKS, &c. THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF THE REVEREND ADAM SEDGWICK, LL.D., F.R.S., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and Woodwardian Professor of Geology from 18 18 to 1873. (Dedicated, by special permission, to Her Majesty the Queen.) By John Willis Clark, M.A., F.S.A., formerly Fellow of Trinity College, and Thomas M^Kenny Hughes, M.A., Woodwardian Professor of Geology. 2 vols. Demy 8vo. {Nearly ready. MEMORIALS OF THE LIFE OF GEORGE ELWES CORRIE, D.D., formerly Master of Jesus College, Cambridge. Edited by M. Holroyd. Demy 8vo. lis. THE DESPATCHES OF EARL GOWER, English Am- bassador at the court of Versailles from June 1790 to August 1792, to which are added the Despatches of Mr Lindsay and Mr Munro, and the Diary of Lord Palmerston in France during July and August 1 79 1. Edited by Oscar Browning, M. A. Demy8vo. 15^. LIFE AND TIMES OF STEIN, OR GERMANY AND PRUSSIA IN THE NAPOLEONIC AGE, by J. R. Seeley, M.A., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge, with Portraits and Maps. 3 Vols. Demy 8vo. 30^-. "Dr Busch's volume has made people think feel very pardonable pride at seeing one of and talk even more than usual of Prince Bis- their countrynien undertake to write the his- marck, and Professor Seeley's very learned wrork tory of a period from the investigation of on Stein will turn attention to an earlier and an which even laborious Germans are apt to almost equally eminent German statesman.... shrink." — Times. He was one, perhaps the chief, of the illus- " In a notice of this kind scant justice can trious group of strangers who came to the be done to a work like the one before us; no rescue of Prussia in her darkest hour, about short resume can give even the most meagre the time of the inglorious Peace of Tilsit, and notion of the contents of these volumes, which who laboured to put life and order into her contain no page that is superfluous, and none dispirited army, her impoverished finances, and that is uninteresting." — Athenceum. her inefficient Civil Service. Englishmen will THE GROWTH OF ENGLISH INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE DURING THE EARLY AND MIDDLE AGES. By W. Cunningham, D.D., University Lecturer. Demy 8vo. i6j". " Dr Cunningham's book is one of excep- marshalling the varied facts in the vast field tional interest and usefulness. It cannot be which has been traversed, and by singular too highly praised. It is characterised by re- clearness and fehcity of expression." — Scots- search and thought, by a remarkable power of man. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES OF GREEK HISTORY. Accompanied by a short narrative of events, with references to the sources of information and extracts from the ancient authorities, by Carl Peter. Translated from the German by G. Chawner, M.A., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. Demy 4to. los. London : C. ^. Clav dr' Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. PUBLICATIONS OF THE ARCHITFXTURAL HISTORY OF THE UNI- VERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE AND OF THE COLLEGES OF CAMBRIDGE AND ETON, by the late Robert Willis, M.A. F.R.S., Jacksonian Professor in the University of Cambridge. Edited with large Additions and brought up to the present time by John Willis Clark, M.A., formerly Fellow of Trinity College, Cam- bridge. Four Vols. Super Royal 8vo. £6. ds. Also a limited Edition of the same, consisting of 120 numbered Copies only, large paper Quarto ; the woodcuts and steel engravings mounted on India paper ; price Twenty-five Guineas net each set. THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES TO THE ROYAL INJUNCTIONS OF 1535, by J. B. MULLINGER, M.A., Lecturer on History and Librarian to St John's College. Part I. Demy 8vo. (734 pp.), lis. Part II. From the Royal Injunctions of 1535 to the Accession of Charles the First. Demy 8vo. \Zs. " He shews in the statutes of the Colleges, "Mr MuUinger displays an admirable the internal organization of the University, its thoroughness in his work. Nothing could be connection with national problems, its studies, more exhaustive and conscientious than his its social life. All this he combines in a method: and his style. ..is picturesque and form which is eminently readable."— Prof. elevated." — Times. Creighton in Coiit. Review. SCHOLAE ACADEMICAE: some Account of the Studies at the English Universities in the Eighteenth Century. By C. Wordsworth, M.A., Fellow of Peterhouse. Demy 8vo. \os. 6d. " Mr Wordsworth has collected a great ... To a great extent it is purely a book of re- quantity of minute and curious information ference. and as such it will be of permanent about the working of Cambridge institutions in value for the historical knowledge of English the last century, with an occasional comparison education and learning." — Saturday Review. of the corresponding state of things at Oxford. HISTORY OF THE COLLEGE OF ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST, by Thomas Baker, B.D., Ejected Fellow. Edited by John E. B. Mayor, M.A. Two Vols. Demy 8vo. 24J. HISTORY OF NEPAL, translated by MUNSHI SHEW Shunker Singh and Pandit Shri Gunanand; edited with an Introductory Sketch of the Country and People by Dr D. Wright, late Residency Surgeon at Kathmandu, and with facsimiles of native drawings, and portraits of Sir JUNG BAHADUR, the King OF Nepal, &c. Super- royal 8vo. \os. 6d. KINSHIP AND MARRIAGE IN EARLY ARABIA, by W. Robertson Smith, M.A., LL.D., Professor of Arabic and Fellow of Christ's College, Crown 8vo. js. 6d. "It would be superfluous to praise a book early history can afford to be •wiih.out Kinship so learned and masterly as Professor Robertson in Early Arabia.^' — Nature. Smith's ; it is enough to say that no student of TRAVELS IN ARABIA DESERTA IN 1876 AND 1877. By Charles M. Doughty, of Gonville and Caius College. With Illustrations and a Map. 2 vols. Demy 8vo. £t,. y. "This is in several respects a remarkable "We judge this book to be the most re- book. It records the ten years' travels of the markable record of adventure and research author throughout Northern Arabia, in the which has been published to this generation." Hejas and Nejd, from Syria to Mecca. No —Spectator. doubt this region has been visited by previous "Its value as a storehouse of knowledge travellers, but none, we venture to think, have simply cannot be exaggerated." — Saturday done their work with so much thoroughness or Review. with more enthusiasm and love." — Times. London : C. J. Cla v <Sr* Sons, Cainbridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 23 A JOURNEY OF LITERARY and ARCH^OLOGICAL RESEARCH IN NEPAL AND NORTHERN INDIA, during the Winter of 1884-5. By Cecil Bendall, M.A., Professor of Sanskrit in University College, London. Demy 8vo. \os. THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA. By J. E. C. MUNRO, LL.M., Professor of Law and Political Economy at Vic- toria University, Manchester. Demy 8vo. \os. CAMBRIDGE HISTORICAL ESSAYS. POLITICAL PARTIES IN ATHENS DURING THE PELOPONNESIAN WAR, by L. Whibley, M.A., Fellow of Pembroke College, Cambridge. (Prince Consort Dissertation, 1888.) Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 7.s. 6d. POPE GREGORY THE GREAT AND HIS RELA- TIONS WITH GAUL, by F. W. Kellett, M.A., Sidney Sussex College. (Prince Consort Dissertation, 1888.) Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. THE CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERIMENTS OF THE COMMONWEALTH, being the Thirlwall Prize Essay for 1889, by E. Jenks, B.A., LL.B., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. MISCELLANEOUS. THE LITERARY REMAINS OF ALBRECHT DURER, by W. M. Conway. With Transcripts from the British Museum MSS., and Notes by LiNA ECKENSTEIN. Royal 8vo. 21s. {The Edition is limited to $00 copies.) GRAY AND HIS FRIENDS. Letters and Relics in great part hitherto unpublished. Edited by the Rev. D. C. Tovey, M.A. [In the Press. A LATIN-ENGLISH DICTIONARY. Printed from the (Incomplete) MS. of the late T. H. Key, M.A., F.R.S. Cr. 4to. 31^-. 6d. THE COLLECTED PAPERS OF HENRY BRAD- SHAW, including his Memoranda and Communications read before the Cambridge Antiquarian Society. With i^^ facsimiles. Edited by F. J. H. Jenkinson, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. 16^-. THE LATIN HEPTATEUCH. Published piecemeal by the French printer William Morel (1560) and the French Bene- dictines E. Martene (1733) and J. B. Pitra (1852—88). Critically reviewed by John E. B. Mayor, M.A., Professor of Latin in the University of Cambridge. Demy 8vo. \os. 6d. A CATALOGUE OF ANCIENT MARBLES IN GREAT BRITAIN, by Prof. Adolf Michaelis. Translated by C. A. M. Fennell, Litt. D. Royal 8vo. Roxburgh (Morocco back), £2. 2s. "The book is beautifully executed, and with grateful to the Syndics of the University Press its few handsome plates, and excellent indexes, for the liberal facilities afforded by them to- does much credit to the Cambridge Press, All wards the production of this important volume lovers of true art and of good work should be by Professor Michaelis." — Saturday Revie^v. London : C. J. Cla v &^ SONS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lanr, 24 PUBLICATIONS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF THE DIVINA COMMEDIA. Including the complete col- lation throughout the Inferno of all the MSS. at Oxford and Cam- bridge. By the Rev. Edward Moore, D.D. Demy 8vo. 2\s. RHODES IN ANCIENT TIMES. By Cecil Torr, M.A. With six plates. Demy 8vo. \os. 6d. RHODES IN MODERN TIMES. By the same Author. With three plates. Demy 8vo. Sj. THE WOODCUTTERS OF THE NETHERLANDS during the last quarter of the Fifteenth Century. In 3 parts. I. His- tory of the Woodcutters. II. Catalogue of their Woodcuts. III. List of Books containing Woodcuts. By W. M. CONWAY. DemySvo. ioj. 6^^. THE LITERATURE OF THE FRENCH RENAIS- SANCE. An Introductory Essay. By A. A. Tilley, M.A. Cr. 8vo. 6s. FROM SHAKESPEARE TO POPE: an Inquiry into the causes and phenomena of the rise of Classical Poetry in England. By Edmund Gosse, M.A. Crown 8vo. 6s. CHAPTERS ON ENGLISH METRE. By Rev. Joseph B. Mayor, M.A. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. A GRAMMAR OF THE IRISH LANGUAGE. By Prof. WiNDiscH. TranslatedbyDr Norman Moore. Crown 8vo. 7s.6d. LECTURES ON TEACHING, delivered in the University of Cambridge in the Lent Term, 1880. By J. G. FlTCH, M.A., LL.D. Her Majesty's Inspector of Training Colleges. Cr. 8vo. New Edit. 5^-. "Mr Fitch's book covers so wide a field hest existing vade mecufn for the teacher." — and touches on so many burning questions that Pall Mall Gazette. we must be content to recommend it as the LECTURES ON THE GROWTH AND MEANS OF TRAINING THE INTELLECTUAL FACULTY, delivered in the University of Cambridge. By Francis Warner, M.D., F.R.C.P. Crown 8vo. 4^-. 6d. OCCASIONAL ADDRESSES ON EDUCATIONAL SUBJECTS. By S. S. Laurie, M.A., LL.D. Crown 8vo. 5^. A MANUAL OF CURSIVE SHORTHAND. By H. L. Callendar, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 2J. A SYSTEM OF PHONETIC SPELLING ADAPTED TO ENGLISH. By H. L. Callendar, M.A. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 6d. A PRIMER OF CURSIVE SHORTHAND. By H. L. Callendar, M.A. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 6d. ESSAYS FROM THE SPECTATOR IN CURSIVE SHORTHAND. By H. L. Callendar, M.A. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 6d. READING PRACTICE IN CURSIVE SHORTHAND. Easy Extracts for Beginners. The Gospel according to St Mark, (First half). The Vicar of Wakefield. Chaps. I.— V. Alice in Wonderland. Chap. VII. 3^. each. For other books on Education^ see Pitt Press Series^ p. 39. London: C. y. Cr.AV &^ Sons, Cnwhridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNlVEkSlTV PRESS. 25 STUDIES IN THE LITERARY RELATIONS OF ENGLAND WITH GERMANY IN THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. By C. H. Herford, M.A. Crown 8vo. 9^. ADMISSIONS TO GONVILLE AND CAIUS COLLEGE in the University of Cambridge March 1558 — 9 to Jan. 1678—9. Edited by J. Venn, Sc.D., and S. C. Venn. Demy 8vo. los. ECCLESIAE LONDINO-BATAVAE ARCHIVVM. TOMVS Primvs. Abrahami Ortelii et virorum eruditorum ad eundem et ad Jacobvm Colivm Orteltanvm Epistulae, 1524— 1628. ToMVS Secvndvs. EPISTVLAE ET TRACTATVS cum Reformationis turn Ecclesiae Londino-Batavae Historiam Illustrantes 1544 — 1622. Ex autographis mandante Ecclesia Londino-Batava edidit Joannes Henricvs Hessels. Demy 4to. Each volume, separately, £2,. los. Taken together ^5. 5^-. Net. CATALOGUE OF THE HEBREW MANUSCRIPTS preserved in the University Library, Cambridge. By Dr S. M. Schiller-Szinessy. Volume I. containing Section I. The Holy Scriptures; Section II. Coimnentaries on the Bible. Demy 8vo. 9^. A CATALOGUE OF THE MANUSCRIPTS preserved in the Library of the University of Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 5 Vols. los. each. INDEX TO THE CATALOGUE. Demy 8vo. los. A CATALOGUE OF ADVERSARIA and printed books preserved in the Library of the University of Cambridge. 3J. 6d. THE ILLUMINATED MANUSCRIPTS IN THE Li- brary of the Fitzwilliam Museum, Catalogued with Descriptions, and an Introduction, by W. G. Searle, M.A. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. A CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF THE GRACES, Documents, and other Papers in the University Registry which concern the University Library. Demy 8vo. 2s. 6d. CATALOGUS BIBLIOTHECE BURCKHARDTIAN.E. Demy 4to. 5 J. GRADUATI CANTABRIGIENSES : SIVE CATA- LOGUS exhibens nomina eorum quos gradu quocunque ornavit Academia Cantabrigiensis (1800— 1884). Cura H. R. LUARD S. T. P. DemySvo. 12s. 6d. STATUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE and for the Colleges therein, made, published and approved (1878 — 1882) under the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge Act, 1877. With an Appendix. Demy 8vo. i6s. STATUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. With Acts of Parliament relating to the University. 8vo. 3J. 6d. ORDINANCES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAM- BRIDGE. Demy 8vo., cloth. 7s. 6d. TRUSTS, STATUTES AND DIRECTIONS affecting (i) The Professorships of the University. (2) The Scholarships and Prizes. (3) Other Gifts and Endowments. Demy 8vo. $3. COMPENDIUM of UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS. 6d. London : C. J. Cla v <^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. 36 PUBLICATIONS OF Ci)e Cambriliae %Mt for ^cl)i3ols ann Colleges* General Editor : The Very Reverend J. J. S. Perowne, D.D., Dean of Peterborough. " It is difficult to commend too highly this excellent series." — Guardian. " The modesty of the general title of this series has, we believe, led many to misunderstand its character and underrate its value. The books are well suited for study in the upper forms of our best schools, but not the less are they adapted to the wants of all Bible students who are not specialists. We doubt, indeed, whether any of the numerous popular commentaries recently issued in this country will be found more serviceable for general use." — Academy. "One of the most popular and useful literary enterprises of the nineteenth century." — Baptist Magazine. " Of great value. The whole series of comments for schools is highly esteemed by students capable of forming a judgment. The books are scholarly without being pretentious : information is so given as to be easily understood." — Sword and Trowel. The Very Reverend J. J. S. Perowne, D.D., Dean of Peterborough, has undertaken the general editorial supervision of the work, assisted by a staff of eminent coadjutors. Some of the books have been already edited or undertaken by the following gentlemen : Rev. A. Carr, M.A., late Assistant Master at Wellington College, Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D., Canon of Rochester. Rev. S. Cox, Nottingham. Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D., Professor of Hebrew^ Edinburgh. The Ven. F. W. Farrar, D.D., Archdeacon of Westminster. Rev. C. D. GiNSBURG, LL.D. Rev. A. E. Humphreys, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Rev. A. F. KiRKPATRiCK, B.D., Fellow of Trinity College, Regius Professor of Hebrew. Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A., late Professor at St David's College, Lampeter. Rev. J. R. LuMBY, D.D., Norrisian Professor of Divinity. Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D., Warden of St Augustine's College, Canterbury. Rev. H. C. G. Moule, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Principal of Ridley Hall, Cambridge. Rev. E. H. Perowne, D.D., Master of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. The Ven. T. T. Perowne, B.D., Archdeacon of Norwich. Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D., Master of University College, Durham. The Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D., Dean of Wells. Rev. H. E. Ryle, M.A., Hulsean Professor of Divinity. Rev. W. SiMCOX, M. A., late Rector of Weyhill, Hants. W. Robertson Smith, M.A., Professor of Arabic and Fellotu of Christ's College. The Very Rev. H. D. M. Spence, M.A., Dean of Gloucester. Rev. A. W. Streane, M.A., Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. London : C. J. Cla v &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 27 THE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS & COLLEGES. Cont. Now Ready. Clothj Extra Fcap. Svo. THE BOOK OF JOSHUA. By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 2 Maps. 2s. 6d. THE BOOK OF JUDGES. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. With Map. y. 6d. THE FIRST BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the Rev. Professor KiRKPATRiCK, B.D. With Map. 3^. 6d. THE SECOND BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the Rev. Professor Kirkpatrick, B.D. With 2 Maps. 3^. 6d. THE FIRST BOOK OF KINGS. By Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D. 3^.6^. THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS. By the same Editor, ^s. 6d. THE BOOK OF JOB. By the Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. 5^. THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES. By the Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D. 5J-. THE BOOK OF JEREMIAH. By the Rev. A. W. Streane, M.A. With Map. 4^. 6d. THE BOOK OF HOSEA. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D. 3^. THE BOOKS OF OBADIAH AND JONAH. By Archdeacon Perowne. 2s. 6d. THE BOOK OF MIC AH. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, D.D. i.f. 6d. THE BOOKS OF HAGGAI, ZECHARIAH AND MALACHL By Archdeacon Perowne. ^s. 6d. THE BOOK OF MALACHL By Archdeacon Perowne. i^. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By the Rev. A. Carr, M.A. With 2 Maps. 2s. 6d. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 4 Maps. 2s. 6d. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon F. W. Farrar. With 4 Maps. 4J-. 6d. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. With 4 Maps. 4J. 6d. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By the Rev. Professor Lumby, D.D. With 4 Maps. 4^. 6d. THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. By the Rev. H. C. G. MouLE, M.A. 3J. 6d. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. With a Map and Plan. 2s. THE SECOND EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 2s. THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS. By the Rev. H. C G. MouLE, M.A. 2s. 6d. THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS. By the Rev. H. C. G. MouLE, M.A. 2s. 6d. London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. 28 PUBLICATIONS OF THE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS & COLLEGES. Cont. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By Arch. Farrar. 3^. 6^. THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF ST JAMES. By the Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D. is. 6d. THE EPISTLES OF ST PETER AND ST JUDE. By the same Editor. 2s. 6d. THE EPISTLES OF ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. y.6d. Preparing. THE BOOK OF GENESIS. By the Very Rev. the Dean of Peterborough. THE BOOKS OF EXODUS, NUMBERS AND DEUTERO- NOMY. By the Rev. C. D. Ginsburg, LL.D. THE BOOKS OF EZRA AND NEHEMIAH. By the Rev. Prof. Ryle, M.A. THE BOOK OF PSALMS. By the Rev. Prof. Kirkpatrick, B.D. THE BOOK OF ISAIAH. By Prof. W. Robertson Smith, M.A. THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL. By the Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS. By the Rev. E. H. Perowne, D.D. THE EPISTLES TO THE COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON. By the Rev. H. C. G. Moule, M.A. THE EPISTLES TO TIMOTHY AND TITUS. By the Rev. A. E. Humphreys, M.A. THE BOOK OF REVELATION. By the Rev. W. Simcox, M.A. Cfte Smaller Cambridge asible lot ^cbonfe* The Smaller Cambridge Bible for Schools will form an entirely new series of commentaries on some selected books of the Bible. It is expected that they will be prepared for the most part by the Editors of the larger series ( The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges). The volumes will be issued at a low price ^ and will be suitable to the requirements of preparatory avd elementary schools. Now ready. Price \s. each. THE FIRST AND SECOND BOOKS OF SAMUEL. By Rev. Prof. Kirkpatrick, B.D. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By Rev. A. Carr, M.A. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon Farrar, D.D. London : C. y. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. ig Cfte CambrflJffe (Bvttk Cestament for ^rftools; anti Colleges;, with a Revised Text, based on the most recent critical authorities, and English Notes, prepared under the direction of the General Editor, The Very Reverend J. J. S. PEROWNE, D.D. IVow Ready. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By the Rev. A. Carr, M.A. With 4 Maps. \s. 6d. " Copious illustrations, gathered from a great variety of sources, make his notes a very valu- able aid to the student. They are indeed remarkably interesting, while all explanations on meanings, applications, and the like are distinguished by their lucidity and good sense " — Pall Mall Gazette. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 3 Maps. 4^. 6^. ''The Cambridge Greek Testament, of which Dr Maclear's edition of the Gospel according to St Mark is a volume, certainly supplies a want. Without pretending to compete with the leading commentaries, or to embody very much original research, it forms a most satisfactory introduction to the study of the New Testament in the original . . . Dr Maclear's introduction contains all that is known of St Mark's life, an account of the circumstances in which the Gospel was composed, an excellent sketch of the special characteristics of this Gospel ; an analysis, and a chapter on the text of the New Testament generally . . . The work is completed by three good maps." — Satur- day Review. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon Farrar. With 4 Maps. 6j. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. With 4 Maps. ds. "A valuable addition has also been made to 'The Cambridge Greek Testament for Schools,' Dr Plummer's notes on 'the Gospel according to St John' are scholarly, concise, and instructive, and embody the results of much thought and wide reading." — Expositor. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By the Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D., with 4 Maps. ds. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 3.^. THE SECOND EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. [Preparing. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By Arch. Farrar, D.D. 3J. 6d. THE EPISTLES OF ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. 4.f. London : C. J. Cla v ^t* Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane 30 PUBLICATIONS OF THE PITT PRESS SERIES. ^Copies of the Pitt Press Series may generally be obtained bound in two parts for Class use, the text and notes in separate volumes.^ I. GREEK. ARISTOPHANES— AVES—PLUTUS—RANAE. With English Notes and Introduction by W. C. Green, M.A., late Assistant Master at Rugby School. 3J. <id. each. EURIPIDES. HERACLEID^. With Introduction and Explanatory Notes by E. A. Beck, M.A., Fellow of Trinity Hall. y. 6d. EURIPIDES. HERCULES FURENS. With Intro- ductions, Notes and Analysis. By A. Gray, M.A., Fellow of Jesus College, and J. T. Hutchinson, M.A., Christ's College. New Edition. 2s. EURIPIDES. HIPPOLYTUS. By W. S. Hadley, M.A. Fellow of Pembroke College, is. EURIPIDES. IPHIGENEIA IN AULIS. By C. E. S. Headlam, B.A., Fellow of Trinity Hall. 2s. 6d. HERODOTUS, Book V. Edited with Notes, Introduction and Maps by E. S. Shuckburgh, M. A., late Fellow of Emmanuel College. 3^. HERODOTUS, Book VI. By the same Editor. 4^-. HERODOTUS, Book VIIL, Chaps. 1—90. By the same Editor, y. 6d. "We could not wish for a better introduction to Herodotus." — Jourtial of Education. HERODOTUS, Book IX., Chaps. 1—89. By the same Editor. 3J. dd. HOMER— ODYSSEY, Books IX. X. With Introduction, Notes and Appendices. By G. M. Edwards, M.A., Fellow and Classical Lecturer of Sidney Sussex College. 2s. 6d. each. HOMER— ODYSSEY, Book XXI. By the same Editor. 2s. LUCIANI SOMNIUM CHARON PISCATOR ET DE LUCTU, with English Notes by W. E. Heitland, M.A., Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge. New Edition, with Appendix. 3^. 6d. PLATONIS APOLOGIA SOCRATIS. With Introduction, Notes and Appendices by J. Adam, M.A., Fellow and Classical Lecturer of Emmanuel College. 3^. 6d. "A worthy representative of English Scholarship," — Classical Review. CRITO. With Introduction, Notes and Appendix. By the same Editor. 2s. 6d. "Mr Adam, already known as the author of a careful and scholarly edition of the Apology of Plato, will, we think, add to his reputation by his work upon the Crito." — AcadetJty. "A scholarly edition of a dialogue which has never been really well edited in English." — Guardian. EUTHYPHRO. By the same Editor. 2s. 6d. London : C. J. Cla y &> Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse., Ave Mai'ia Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 31 PLUTARCH. LIVES OF THE GRACCHL With Intro- duction, Notes and Lexicon by Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 6s. PLUTARCH. LIFE OF NICIAS. With Introduction and Notes. By Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. e^s. "This edition is as careful and thorough as Dr Holden's work always is." — Spectator. PLUTARCH. LIFE OF SULLA. With Introduction, Notes, and Lexicon. By the Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 6s. PLUTARCH. LIFE OF TIMOLEON. With Introduc- tion, Notes and Lexicon. By Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 6s. SOPHOCLES.— OEDIPUS TYRANNUS. School Edition, w\\\\ Introduction and Commentary, by R. C. Jebb, Litt. D., LL.D., Regius Professor of Greek in the University of Cambridge. 4^. 6d. THUCYDIDES. Book VII. With Notes and Introduction. By H. R. Tottenham, M. A., Fellow of St John's College. \In the Press. XENOPHON.— AGESILAUS. The Text revised with Critical and Explanatory Notes, Introduction, Analysis, and Indices. By H. Hailstone, M.A., late Scholar of Peterhouse. is. 6d. XENOPHON.— ANABASIS, Books I. III. IV. and V. With a Map and English Notes by Alfred Pretor, M.A., Fellovi^ of St Catharine's College, Cambridge, is. each. "Mr Pretor's 'Anabasis of Xenophon, Book IV.' displays a union of accurate Cambridge scholarship, with experience of what is required by learners gained in examining middle-class schools. The text is large and clearly printed, and the notes explain all difficulties. . . . Mr Pretor's notes seem to be all that could be wished as regards grammar, geography, and other matters." — The Academy. BOOKS II. VI. and VII. By the same. 2s. 6d. each. "Had we to introduce a young Greek scholar to Xenophon^ we should esteem ourselves fortunate in having Pretor's text-book as our chart and guide." — Contemporary Review. XENOPHON.— ANABASIS. By A. Pretor, M.A., Text and Notes, complete in two Volumes. 7^. 6d. XENOPHON.— CYROPAEDEIA. Books 1. 11. With In- troduction, Notes and Map. By Rev. H. A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 1 vols. Vol. I. Text. Vol. II. Notes. 6s. "The work is worthy of the editor's well-earned reputation for scholarship and industry."— A theneeum. Books III., IV., V. By the same Editor. 5^. " Dr Holden's Commentary is equally good in history and in scholarship." — Saturday Review. Book VI. By the same Editor. [Nearly ready. M. LATIN. BEDA'S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY, BOOKS III., IV., the Text from the very ancient MS. in the Cambridge University Library, collated with six other MSS. Edited, with a life from the German of Ebert, and with Notes, &c. by J. E. B. Mayor, M.A., Professor of Latin, and J. R. Lumby, D.D., Norrisian Professor of Divinity. Revised edition. V' ^d. Books I. and II. In the Press, "In Bede's works Englishmen can go back to origines of their history, unequalled for form and matter by any modern European nation. Prof. Mayor has done good service in ren- dering a part of Bede*s greatest work accessible to those who can read Latin with ease. He has adorned this edition of the third and fourth books of the * Ecclesiastical History' with that amazing erudition for which he is unrivalled among Englishmen and rarely equalled by Germans. And however interesting and valuable the text may be, we can certainly apply to his notes the expression, La sattce vaut mieux que le poisson. They are literally crammed with interest- ing information about early English life. For though ecclesiastical in name, Bede's history treats of all parts of the national life, since the Church had points of contact with all." — Examiner. London : C. J. Cla y &= Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. 32 PUBLICATIONS OF CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. I. With Maps and English Notes by A. G. Peskett, M.A., Fellow of Magdalene College, Cambridge, is. 6d. CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. II. III. By the same Editor. 2s. CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. I. II. IIL by the same Editor. -i,s. CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. IV. and V. and COMMENT. VII. by the same Editor. 2s. each. CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. VI. and COMMENT. VIII. by the same Editor, is. 6d. each. CAESAR. DE BELLO CIVILI COMMENT. I. by the same Editor. [/;, ^/^^ p^.^^^ CICERO. ACTIO PRIMA IN C VERREM. With Introduction and Notes. By H. Cowie, M. A., Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge, is. 6d. CICERO. DE AMICITIA. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D., Fellow and Tutor of Gonville and Caius College. New Edition. 3^. 6d. "Mr Reid has decidedly attained his aim, namely, 'a thorough examination of the Latinity of the dialogue. ' The revision of the text is most valuable, and comprehends sundry acute corrections. . . . This volume, like Mr Reid's other editions, is a solid gain to the scholar- ship of the country." — Atheiiceum. "A more distinct gain to scholarship is Mr Reid's able and thorough edition of the De Amicitid of Cicero, a work of which, whether we regard the exhaustive introduction or the instructive and most suggestive commentary, it would be difficult to speak too highly. . . . When we come to the commentary, we are only amazed by its fulness in proportion to its bulk. Nothing is overlooked which can tend to enlarge the learner's general knowledge of Ciceronian Latin or to elucidate the text."— Saturday Review. CICERO. DE SENECTUTE. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D. Revised Edition. 7,s. 6d. "The notes are excellent and scholarlike, adapted for the upper forms of public schools, and ikely to be useful even to more advanced students." — Guardian. CICERO. DIVINATIO IN Q. CAECILIUM ET ACTIO PRIMA IN C. VERREM. With Introduction and Notes by W. E. Heitland, M.A., and Herbert Cowie, M.A., Fellows of St John's College, Cambridge. 3J. CICERO. PHILIPPICA SECUNDA. With Introduction and Notes by A. G. Peskett, M.A., Fellow of Magdalene College. 3^. 6d. CICERO. PRO ARCHIA POETA. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D. Revised Edition. 2s. " It is an admirable specimen of careful editing. An Introduction tells us everything we could wish to know about Archias, about Cicero's connexion with him, about the merits of the trial, and the genuineness of the speech. The text is well and carefully printed. The notes are clear and scholar-like. . . . No boy can master this little volume without feeling that he has advanced a long step in scholarship." — The Academy. CICERO. PRO BALBO. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D. IS. 6d. " We are bound to recognize the pains devoted in the annotation of these two orations to the minute and thorough study of their Latinity, both in the ordinary notes and in the textual appendices." — Saturday Review. London: C. J. Clav &= Sons, Cambridge University P7'ess Warehouse., Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 33 CICERO. PRO MILONE, with a Translation of Asconius' Introduction, Marginal Analysis and English Notes. Edited by the Rev. John Smyth Purton, B.D., late President and Tutor of St Catharine's College. IS. 6d. "The editorial work is excellently done." — The Acadetny. CICERO. PRO MURENA. With Enghsh Introduction and Notes. By W. E. Heitland, M.A., Fellow and Classical Lecturer of St John's College, Cambridge. Second Edition, carefully revised. 3^. "Those students are to be deemed fortunate who have to read Cicero's lively and brilliant oration for L. Murena with Mr Heitland's handy edition, which may be pronounced 'four-square* in point of equipment, and which has, not without good reason, attained the honours of a second edition." — Saturday Review. CICERO. PRO PLANCIO. Edited by H. A. Holden, LL.D., Examiner in Greek to the University of London. Second Edition. CICERO. PRO SULLA. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D. 3J. dd. " Mr Reid is so well known to scholars as a commentator on Cicero that a new work from him scarcely needs any commendation of ours. Hjs edition of the speech Pro Sulla is fully equal in merit to the volumes which he has already published ... It would be difficult to speak too highly of the notes. There could be no better way of gaining an insight into the characteristics of Cicero's style and the Latinity of his period than by making a careful study of this speech with the aid of Mr Reid's commentary . . . Mr Reid's intimate knowledge of the minutest details of scholarship enables him to detect and explain the shghtest points of distinction between the usages of different authors and diflerent periods . . . The notes are followed by a valuable appendix on the text, and another on points of orthography ; an excellent index brings the work to a close." — Saturday Review. CICERO. SOMNIUM SCIPIONIS. With Introduction and Notes. By W. D. Pearman, M.A., Head Master of Potsdam School, Jamaica, ^s. HORACE. EPISTLES, Book I. With Notes and Intro- duction by E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A. 2^. 6^. LIVY. Book IV. With Notes and Introduction, by Rev. H. M. Stephenson, M.A. is. 6d. LIVY. Book V. With Notes and Introduction by L. Whibley, M.A., Fellow of Pembroke College, is. 6d., [Shortly. LIVY. Books XXL, XXII. With Notes, Introduction and Maps. By M. S. Dimsdale, M.A., Fellow of King's College, is. 6d. each. LUCAN. PHARSALIA LIBER PRIMUS. Edited with English Introduction and Notes by W. E. Heitland, M.A. and C. E. Haskins, M.A., Fellows and Lecturers of St John's College, Cambridge. IS. 6d. "A careful and scholarlike production." — Times. "In nice parallels of Lucan from Latin poets and from Shakspeare, Mr Haskins and Mr Heitland deserve praise." — Saturday Review. LUCRETIUS. Book V. With Notes and Introduction by J. D. Duff, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College, is. OVID. FASTI. Liber VI. With a Plan of Rome and Notes by A. SiDGWiCK, M.A., Tutor of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. IS. 6d. " Mr Sidgwick's editing of the Sixth Book of Ovid's /^a^// furnishes a careful and serviceable volume for average students. It eschews 'construes' which supersede the use of the dictionary, but gives full explanation of grammatical usages and historical and mythical allusions, besides illustrating peculiarities of style, true and false derivations, and the more remarkable variations of the text." — Saturday Review. London : C. J. Cla v &= Sons^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. 34 PUBLICATIONS OF QUINTUS CURTIUS. A Portion of the History. (Alexander in India.) By W. E. Heitland, M. A., Fellow and Lecturer of St John's College, Cambridge, and T. E. Raven, B.A., Assistant Master in Sherborne School, 3^. 6d. "Equally commendable as a genuine addition to the existing stock of school-books is Alexander in India, a compilation from the eighth and ninth books of Q. Curtius, edited for the Pitt Press by Messrs Heitland and Raven. . . . The work of Curtius has merits of its own, which, in former generations, made it a favourite with English scholars, and which still make it a popular text-book in Continental schools The reputation of Mr Heitland is a sufficient guarantee for the scholarship of the notes, which are ample without being excessive, and the book is well furnished with all that is needful in the nature of maps, indices, and appendices." —Academy. VERGIL. AENEID. Libri L, II., III., IV., V., VI., VII. VIII., IX., X., XI., XII. Edited with Notes by A. Sidgwick, M.A., Tutor of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. \s. 6d. each. " Mr Sidgwick's Vergil is we believe, the best school edition of the poet." — Guardian. " Mr Arthur Sidgwick's 'Vergil, Aeneid, Book XII.' is worthy of his reputation, and is dis- tinguished by the same acuteness and accuracy of knowledge, appreciation of a boy's difficulties and ingenuity and resource in meeting them, which we have on other occasions had reason to praise in these pages." — The Academy. "As masterly in its clearly divided preface and appendices as in the sound and independent character of its annotations. . . . There is a great deal more in the notes than mere compilation and suggestion. ... No difficulty is left unnoticed or unhandled." — Saturday Review. VERGIL. AENEID. Libri IX. X. in one volume. 3^. VERGIL. AENEID. Libri X., XL, XII. in one volume. 3^-. 6d. VERGIL. BUCOLICS. With Introduction and Notes, by the same Editor, is. 6d. VERGIL. GEORGICS. Libri I. II. By the same Editor. 2s. Libri III. IV. is. " This volume, which completes the Pitt Press edition of Virgil's Georgics, is distinguished by the same admirable judgment and first-rate scholarship as are conspicuous in the former volume and in the "Aeneid" by the same talented editor." — Athenceum. VERGIL. The Complete Works, edited .with Notes, by A. Sidgwick, M.A., Two vols. Vol. I. containing the Text and Intro- duction, y. 6d. Vol. II. The Notes, ^s. 6d. II. FRENCH. CORNEILLE. LA SUITE DU MENTEUR. A Comedy in Five Acts. Edited with Fontenelle's Memoir of the Author, Voltaire's Critical Remarks, and Notes Philological and Historical. By the late GUSTAVE MaSSON. 2S. DE BONNECHOSE. LAZARE HOCHE. With Four Maps, Introduction and Commentary, by C. Colbeck, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Revised Edition. 2^. D'HARLEVILLE. LE VIEUX CELIBATAIRE. A Comedy. With a Biographical Memoir, and Grammatical, Literary and Historical Notes. By Gustave Masson. is. Londoft : C. J. Cla v £r» Sons, Cafndrid^e University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 35 DE LAMARTINE. JEANNE D'ARC. With a Map and Notes Historical and Philological and a Vocabulary by Rev. A. C. Clapin, M.A., St John's College, Cambridge, and Bachelier-es-Lettres of the University of France. Enlarged Edition, ^s. DE VIGNY. LA CANNE DE JONC. Edited with Notes by Rev. H. A. Bull, M.A. 2j. ERCKMANN-CHATRIAN. LA GUERRE. With Map, Introduction and Commentary by the Rev. A. C. Clapin, M.A. ■i^s. LA BARONNE DE STAEL-HOLSTEIN. LE DIREC- TOIRE. (Considerations sur la Revolution Fran9aise. Troisieme et quatrieme parties.) With a Critical Notice of the Author, a Chronological Table, and Notes Historical and Philological, by G. Masson, B.A., and G. W. Prothero, M.A. Revised and enlarged Edition, is, " Prussia under Frederick the Great, and France under the Directory, bring us face to face respectively with periods of history which it is right should be known thoroughly, and which are well treated in the Pitt Press volumes. The latter in particular, an extract from the world-known work of Madame de Stael on the French Revolution, is beyond all praise for the excellence both of its style and of its vazXXsx."— Times. LA BARONNE DE STAEL-HOLSTEIN. DIX AN- NEES D'EXIL. Livre II. Chapitres 1—8. With a Biographical Sketch of the Author, a Selection of Poetical Fragments by Madame de Stael's Contemporaries, and Notes Historical and Philological. By Gustave Masson and G. W. Prothero, M.A. Revised and enlarged edition, is. LEMERCIER. FREDEGONDE. ET BRUNEHAUT. A Tragedy in Five Acts. Edited with Notes, Genealogical and Chronological Tables, a Critical Introduction and a Biographical Notice. By Gustave Masson. is. MOLIERE. LE BOURGEOIS GENTILHOMME, Come- die-Ballet en Cinq Actes. (1670.) With a life of Moliere and Grammatical and Philological Notes. By Rev. A. C. Clapin. Revised Edition. \s. 6d. MOLIERE. L'ECOLE DES FEMMES. Edited with In- troduction and Notes by George Saintsbury, M.A. 2s. 6d. "Mr Saintsbury's clear and scholarly notes are rich in illustration of the valuable kind that vivifies textual comment and criticism." — Saturday Review. MOLIERE. LES PRECIEUSES RIDICULES. With Introduction and Notes by E. G. W. Braunholtz, M. A., Ph.D. University Lecturer in French, is. PI RON. LA METROMANIE, A Comedy, with a Bio- graphical Memoir, and Grammatical, Literary and Historical Notes. By G. Masson. is. RACINE. LES PLAIDEURS. With Introduction and Notes by E. G. W. Braunholtz, M.A., Ph.D. is. S AINTE-BEUVE. M. DARU (Causeries du Lundi, Vol. IX.). With Biographical Sketch of the Author, and Notes Philological and Histo- rical. By Gustave Masson. 2^. SAINTINE. LA PICCIOLA. The Text, with Introduc- tion, Notes and Map, by Rev. A. C. Clapin. is. London : C J. Cla y 6r» Sons^ Ca7nbridge University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lane. 36 PUBLICATIONS OF SCRIBE AND LEGOUVE. BATAILLE DE DAMES. Edited by Rev. H. A. Bull, M.A. ^s. SCRIBE. LE VERRE D'EAU. With a Biographical Memoir, and Grammatical, Literary and Historical Notes. By C. Colbeck, M.A. 2J. " It may be national prejudice, but we consider this edition far superior to any of the series which hitherto have been edited exclusively by foreigners. Mr Colbeck seems better to under- stand the wants and difficulties of an English boy. The etymological notes especially are admi- rable. . . . The historical notes and introduction are a piece of thorough honest work." — Journal of Education. SEDAINE. LE PHILOSOPHE SANS LE SAVOIR. Edited with Notes by Rev. H. A. Bull, M.A., late Master at Wellington College. 2J. THIERRY. LETTRES SUR L'HISTOIRE DE FRANCE (XIII.— XXIV.). By GusTAVE Masson, B.A. and G. W. Prothero, M.A. With Map. IS. 6d. THIERRY. RECITS DES TEMPS MEROVINGIENS I — III. Edited by Gustave Masson, B.A. Univ. Gallic, and A. R. Ropes, M.A. With Map. 3^. VILLEMAIN. LASCARIS, ou LES GRECS DU XV^ SIilCLE, Nouvelle Historique, with a Biographical Sketch of the Author, a Selection of Poems on Greece, and Notes Historical and Philological. By Gustave Masson, B.A. is. VOLTAIRE. HISTOIRE DU SIECLE DE LOUIS XIV. Part I. Chaps. I.— XIII. Edited with Notes Philological and Historical, Biographical and Geographical Indices, etc. by G. Masson, B.A. Univ. Gallic, and G. W. Prothero, M.A., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. 2s. 6d. Part II. Chaps. XIV.— XXIV. With Three Maps of the Period. By the same Editors. 2s. 6d. Part III. Chap. XXV. to the end. By the same Editors. 2S. 6d. XAVIER DE MAISTRE. LA JEUNE SIBERIENNE. LE LEPREUX DE LA CITJ& D'AOSTE. With Biographical Notice, Critical Appreciations, and Notes. By G. Masson, B.A. is. 6d. IV. GERMAN. BALLADS ON GERMAN HISTORY. Arranged and Annotated by W. Wagner, Ph. D., late Professor at the Johanneum, Hamburg, is. "It carries the reader rapidly through some of the most important incidents connected with the German race and name, from the invasion of Italy by the Visigoths under their King Alaric, down to the Franco-German War and the installation of the present Emperor. The notes supply very well the connecting links between the successive periods, and exhibit in its various phases of growth and progress, or the reverse, the vast unwieldy mass which constitutes modern Germany." — Times. London : C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 37 BENEDIX. DOCTOR WESPE. Lustspiel in funf Auf- ziigen. Edited with Notes by Karl Hermann Breul, M.A. 35. FREYTAG. DER STAAT FRIEDRICHS DES GROS- SEN. With Notes. By Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D. 2s. GERMAN DACTYLIC POETRY. Arranged and Anno- tated by the same Editor, y. ®oat)c'^ 5?nabenja^re. (1749— 1759.) GOETHE'S BOY- HOOD : being the First Three Books of his Autobiography. Arranged and Annotated by the same Editor, is. GOETHE'S HERMANN AND DOROTHEA. With an Introduction and Notes. By the same Editor. Revised edition by J. W. Cartmell, M.A. ^s.6d. "The notes are among the best that we know, with the reservation that they are often too abundant." — Academy. GUTZKOW. ZOPF UND SCHWERT. Lustspiel in fiinf Aufziigen von. With a Biographical and Historical Introduction, English Notes, and an Index. By H. J. Wolstenholme, B.A.'(Lond.). 3^. 6d. "We are glad to be able to notice a careful edition of K. Gutzkow's amusing comedy *Zopf and Schwert' by Mr H. J. Wolstenholme. . . . These notes are abundant and contain references to standard grammatical works." — Academy. HAUFF. DAS BILD DES KAISERS. Edited by Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., Ph.D. ^s. HAUFF. DAS WIRTHSHAUS IM SPESSART. Edited by A. ScHLOTTMANN, Ph. D., late Assistant Master at Uppingham School. IS. 6d. HAUFF. DIE KARA VANE. Edited with Notes by A. SCHLOTTMANN, Ph. D. 3^-. 6d. IMMERMANN. DER OBERHOF. A Tale of West- phalian Life. With a Life of Immermann and English Notes, by Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D., late Professor at the Johanneum, Hamburg. 3^-. KOHLRAUSCH. Da6 3a^r 1813 (The Year 1813). With English Notes. By W. Wagner. 2s. LESSING AND GELLERT. SELECTED FABLES. Edited with Notes by Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., Lecturer in German at the University of Cambridge. 3^. MENDELSSOHN'S LETTERS. Selections from. Edited by James SiME, M.A. y. RAUMER. Der erfte ^xtmn (THE FIRST CRUSADE). Condensed from the Author's 'History of the Hohenstaufen', with a life of Raumer, two Plans and English Notes. By W. Wagner, is. " Certainly no more interesting book could be made the subject of examinations. The story of the First Crusade has an undying interest. The notes are, on the whole, good." — Educational Titnes. RIEHL. CULTURGESCHICHTLICHE NOVELLEN. With Grammatical, Philological, and Historical Notes, and a Complete Index, by H. J. Wolstenholme, B.A. (Lond.). y. 6d. London : C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cainbridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane, 38 PUBLICATIONS OF SCHILLER WILHELM TELL. Edited with Intro- duction and Notes by Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., University Lecturer in German, 2S. 6d. UHLAND. ERNST, HERZOG VON SCHWABEN. With Introduction and Notes. By H. J. Wolsten holme, B.A. (Lond.), Lecturer in German at Newnhanni College, Cambridge, y. 6d. V. ENGLISH. ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY. A SKETCH OF, FROM THALES TO CICERO, by Joseph B. Mayor, M. A. 3^. 6d. "Professor Mayor contributes to the Pitt Press Series A Sketch of Ancient Philosophy in which he has endeavoured to give a general view of the philosophical systems illustrated by the genius of the masters of metaphysical and ethical science from Thales to Cicero. In the course of his sketch he takes occasion to give concise analyses of Plato's Republic, and of the Ethics and Politics of Aristotle ; and these abstracts will be to some readers not the least useful portions of the book." — The Guardian. ARISTOTLE. OUTLINES OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF. Compiled by Edwin Wallace, M.A., LL.D. (St Andrews), late Fellow of Worcester College, Oxford. Third Edition Enlarged. 4^-. dd. "A judicious selection of characteristic passages, arranged in paragraphs, each of which is preceded by a masterly and perspicuous English analysis." — Scotsman. "Gives in a comparatively small compass a very good sketch of Aristotle's teaching." — Sat. Review. BACON'S HISTORY OF THE REIGN OF KING HENRY VII. With Notes by the Rev. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. 3^. COWLEY'S ESSAYS. With Introduction and Notes. By the Rev. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D., Norrisian Professor of Divinity; Fellow of St Catharine's College. 4J. MORE'S HISTORY OF KING RICHARD III. Edited with Notes, Glossary and Ijidex of Names. By J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. to which is added the conclusion of the History of King Richard IH. as given in the continuation of Hardyng's Chronicle, London, 1543. 3^^. 6d. MORE'S UTOPIA. With Notes by the Rev. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. 3^-. 6d. " It was originally written in Latin and does not find a place on ordinary bookshelves. A very great boon has therefore been conferred on the general English reader by the managers of the Pitt Press Series, in the issue of a convenient little volume of More's Utopia not in the original Latin, but in the quaint English Translation thereof made by Raphe Robynson, which adds a linguistic interest to the intrinsic merit of the work. . . . All this has been edited in a most com- plete and scholarly fashion by Dr J. R. Lumby, the Norrisian Professor of Divinity, whose name alone is a sufficient warrant for its accuracy. It is a real addition to the modern stock of classical English literature. " — Guardian. THE TWO NOBLE KINSMEN, edited with Intro- duction and Notes by the Rev. Professor Skeat, Litt.D., formerly Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge, is. 6d. "This edition of a play that is well worth study, for more reasons than one, by so careful a scholar as Mr Skeat, deserves a hearty welcome." — Athenceum. "Mr Skeat is a conscientious editor, and has left no difficulty unexplained." — Times. VI. EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE. COMENIUS. JOHN AMOS, Bishop of the Moravians. His Life and Educational Works, by S. S. Laurie, M.A., F.R.S.E., Professor of the Institutes and History of Education in the University of Edinburgh. New Edition, revised. 3^. 6d, London : C. J. Cla y 6^ Sons^ Cambridge Universiiy Press Waj-ehoi/se, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 39 EDUCATION. THREE LECTURES ON THE PRAC- TICE OF. I. On Marking, by H. W. Eve, M.A. II. On Stimulus, by A. SiDGWiCK, M.A. III. On the Teaching of Latin Verse Composition, by E. A. Abbott, D.D. is. LOCKE ON EDUCATION. With Introduction and Notes by the Rev. R. H. Quick, M.A. y. 6d. " The work before us leaves nothing to be desired. It is of convenient form and reasonable price, accurately printed, and accompanied by notes which are admirable. There is no teacher too young to find this book interesting ; there is no teacher too old to find it profitable."— 7"A^ School Bulletin, New York. MILTON'S TRACTATE ON EDUCATION. A fac- simile reprint from the Edition of 1673. Edited, with Introduction and Notes, by Oscar Browning, M.A. 2s. "A separate reprint of Milton's famous letter to Master Samuel Hartlib was a desideratum, and we are grateful to Mr Browning for his elegant and scholarly edition, to which is prefixed the careful resume of the work given in his ' History of Educational Theories ' "—Journal of Education. MODERN LANGUAGES. LECTURES ON THE TEACHING OF, delivered in the University of Cambridge in the Lent Term, 1887. By C Colbeck, M.A., Assistant Master of Harrow School, is. ON STIMULUS. A Lecture delivered for the Teachers' Training Syndicate at Cambridge, May 1882, by A SiDGWiCK, M.A. i.r. TEACHER. GENERAL AIMS OF THE, AND FORM MANAGEMENT. Two Lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge in the Lent Term, 1883, by Archdeacon Farrar, D.D., and R. B. Poole, B.D. Head Master of Bedford Modern School. \s. 6d. TEACHING. THEORY AND PRACTICE OF. By the Rev. Edward Thring, M.A., late Head Master of Uppingham School and Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. New Edition. 4^. 6d. "Any attempt to summarize the contents of the volume would fail to give our readers a taste of the pleasure that its perusal has given \xs."— Journal of Education. BRITISH INDIA, A SHORT HISTORY OF. By Rev. E. S. Carlos, M. A., late Head Master of Exeter Grammar School. \s. GEOGRAPHY, ELEMENTARY COMMERCIAL. A Sketch of the Commodities and the Countries of the World. By H. R. Mill, Sc.D., F.R.S.E., Lecturer on Commercial Geography in the Heriot- Watt College, Edinburgh, is. AN ATLAS OF COMMERCIAL GEOGRAPHY. In- tended as a Companion to the above. By J. G. Bartholomew, F.R.G.S. With an Introduction by Dr H. R. Mill. 3^. VII. MATHEMATICS. EUCLID'S ELEMENTS OF GEOMETRY. Books I. & II. Edited by H. M. Taylor, M.A., Fellow and formerly Tutor of Trinity College, Cambridge, is. 6d. Books III. and IV. By the same Editor. [In the Press. [Other Volumes are in preparation^ l.ondo7i : C. J. Cla v &r SONS, Cambridi^e University Press Warehouse^ Ave Maria Lajte. fflnifaersfftp of aDambrOrge. — -♦ — LOCAL EXAMINATIONS. Examination Papers, for various years, with the Regulations for the Examination. Demy 8vo. 2s. each, or by Post 2s. 2d. Class Lists, for various years, Boys \s., Girls dd. Annual Reports of the Syndicate, with Supplementary Tables showing the success and failure of the Candidates, is. each, by Post is. 3^. HIGHER LOCAL EXAMINATIONS. Examination Papers for various years, to which a7'e added the Regu- lations/or the Examination. Demy 8vo. 2s. each, by Post is. id. Class Lists, for various years, is. each. By Post ij-. id. Reports of the Syndicate. Demy 8vo. u., by Post \s. id. LOCAL LECTURES SYNDICATE. Calendar for the years 1875—80. Fcap. 8vo. cloth. is.\ for 1880—81. \s. TEACHERS' TRAINING SYNDICATE. Examination Papers for various years, to which are added the Regu- lations for the Examination. Demy 8vo. 6^., by Post ']d. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY REPORTER. Published by Authority. Containing all the Official Notices of the University, Reports of Discussions in the Schools, and Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical, Antiquarian and Philological Societies, ^d. weekly. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION PAPERS. These Papers are published in occasional numbers every Term, and in volumes for the Academical year. Vol. XVI. Parts 44 to 65. Papers for the Year 1886—87, iS-J"- cloth. Vol. XVII. „ 65 to 86. „ „ 1887— 88, 15^-. ^/^/^ Vol. XVIII. „ 87 to 107. „ „ 1888—89, 15^. cloth. Oxford and Cambridge Schools Examinations. Papers set in the Examination for Certificates, July, 1888. is. 6d. List of Candidates who obtained Certificates at the Examination held in 1889 ; and Supplementary Tables. 6d. Regulations of the Board for 1890. 9^. Regulations for the Commercial Certificate, 1890. 3d. Report of the Board for the year ending Oct. 31, 1889. is. Studies from the Morphological Laboratory in the Uni- versity of Cambridge. Edited by Adam Sedgwick, M.A., Fellow and Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge. Vol. II. Part I. Royal 8vo. los. Vol.11. Part II. ^s.ed. Vol. III. Parti, ^s-ed. Vol. III. Part II. ^s.6d. Vol. IV. Part I. \2s. 6d. Vol. IV. Part II. los. Vol. IV. Part III. e^s. Uontion : c. j. clay and sons, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. GLASGOW : ^263, ARGYLE STREET. CAMBRIDGE: PRINTK.n RY C, J. CI.AV, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW jj^^B 14 DAY USE ■■■ RETURN CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT TObh^ 202 Main Library LOAN PERIOD 1 HOME USE 2 3 4 5 6 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS 1 -month loans may be renewed by calling 642-3405 6-month loans may be recharged by bringing books to Circulation Desk Renewals and recharges may be made 4 days prior to due dote DUE AS STAMPED BELOW DEC 71978 8 \ SENT ON ILL \ MAY 1 3 1M7 U C BERKELE f \o(z^l%% y 1 FORM NO. DD 6, UNIVERSITY OF BERKEI CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY .EY, CA 94720 U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES CDDfl7E777S