UC-NRLF 
 
 B 3 flbfl ISM 
 
 
 
 
 wmm 
 
 
 mM 
 
 mm 
 
 mBimm 
 
 m 
 M 
 
 mm- 
 
 mmMm 
 
 Hi 
 
 11m 
 
 
 

 • 
 
 
 
 REESE LIBRARY 
 
 - 
 
 OF Tin: 
 
 
 < 
 
 UNIVERSITY'OF. 
 
 CALIFORNIA. \ 
 
 
 •liecewed .. . APR 21 
 
 1893 /,99 . 
 
 i 
 
 Accessions No. ^ 1 10 7.. 
 
 Class No. 
 
THE 
 
 HISTORY OF LAND TENURE 
 IN IRELAND. 
 
aottUon: C. J. CLAY AND SONS, 
 CAMBKIDGE UNIVEKSITY PKESS WAREHOUSE, 
 
 AND 
 
 STEVENS AND SONS, LIMITED, 
 
 119 AND 120, CHANCERY LANE, 
 LAW PUBLISHEES and BOOKSELLERS. 
 
 flCambritiee: DEIGHTON, BELL AND CO. 
 
 ILcipjts : F. A. BROCKHAUS. 
 
 i^eto gorfe: MACMILLAN AND CO. 
 
THE 
 
 HISTOKY OF LAND TENUKE 
 IN IKELAND. 
 
 BEING THE YORKE PRIZE ESSAY OF THE UNIVERSITY 
 OF CAMBRIDGE FOR THE YEAR 1888. 
 
 BY 
 
 WILLIAM ERNEST MONTGOMERY, M.A., LL.M., 
 
 I > 
 
 CLAKE COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE ; 
 AND OF THE INNER TEMPLE, BARRISTER-AT-LAW. 
 
 UNIVERSIT 
 
 CAMBRIDGE : 
 
 AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 
 
 1889 
 
 [All Rights reserved.] 
 

 Si lb 
 
 1 
 
 PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, 
 AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 THE Yorke Prize was founded, under the sanction of the 
 Court of Chancery, from the bequest of Edmund Yorke, 
 M.A., late Fellow of St Catharine's College, Cambridge. It is 
 awarded annually to such graduate of the University, of not 
 more than seven years' standing from his first degree, as shall 
 be the author of the best essay upon some subject relative to 
 " The Law of Property, its Principles and History in various 
 Ages and Countries." The subject announced for the year 
 1888 was " The History of Land Tenure in Ireland," and the 
 following pages owe their existence to the conditions of the 
 Prize which direct that the successful Essay shall be printed 
 and published. 
 
 The immense range of an adequate history of Irish land 
 tenure is manifest, and the present slight sketch can of 
 necessity give but an outline of this involved subject. I 
 may, however, briefly point out a few of the most prominent 
 difficulties met with in tracing the troubled history of Irish 
 land law, and explain the basis upon which the present Essay 
 has been constructed. In the case of the Brehon Law there is 
 undoubtedly a large opening for original work, but the initial 
 difficulty inseparable from an entire dependence on translations, 
 is enhanced by the complex nature of the Laws themselves. 
 I have therefore when dealing with this branch of the subject 
 given full references to the authorities relied on. Passing 
 from the archaic law to English legislation I have throughout 
 assumed that the forces of social disunion, which hindered the 
 
VI PREFACE. 
 
 working of broad legislative measures, are of more importance 
 than the multitude of petty and inefFectual experiments with 
 Irish land law with which the Statute Book is crowded. 
 Minor enactments have therefore been passed over in order to 
 examine more fully those of extended scope. 
 
 The national, religious, and political bias which has coloured 
 so much of the literature connected with Ireland creates an 
 obstacle in the way of an attempt to write an impartial 
 history of the land law. In addition much of the recent land 
 legislation is so involved with current politics as to render it 
 hard to avoid the vexed questions of the day. I have, how- 
 ever, endeavoured to the best of my ability to write without 
 prejudice and to carefully eschew present political controversy. 
 
 Wm. E. MONTGOMERY. 
 
 2, The Cloisters, 
 
 Pump Court, Temple. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 PART I. IRELAND THE ENEMY. 
 
 PAGES 
 
 Chap. I. The Agrarian Community of the Irish Celts . 3 — 18 
 
 Chap. II. The Brehon Law 19—39 
 
 Chap. III. The Colony of the Pale (from Henry II. to 
 
 Henry VII.) 40—54 
 
 Chap. IV. The Colony of the Pale (from Henry VIL to 
 
 James I.) 55 — 64 
 
 PART II. IRELAND THE SLAVE. 
 
 Chap. V. The substitution of English Tenures and the 
 
 era of Protestant Ascendency . . . 65 — 88 
 
 Chap. VL The Land and the People . . . . . 89—101 
 
 Chap. VIL Ireland from 1800— 1850 102—114 
 
 PART III. THE IRELAND OF TO-DAY. 
 
 Chap. VIII. Ulster Tenant-Right and the Devon Commission 115 — 123 
 
 Chap. IX. Free Trade in Land . . . . . . 124—134 
 
 Chap. X. The Act of 1870 135—155 
 
 Chap. XL „ 1881 156—171 
 
 Chap. XII. Recent Legislation 172 — 181 
 
 Table of Statutes cited 182—185 
 
 Index 186—191 
 
•' No rule of law dealing with the contracts of owners and hirers of land is in 
 itself objectively good or bad ; the law which is most advantageous in one 
 society would, if suddenly introduced into another, seem unjust, and probably 
 prove mischievous ; the good or evil effects of any law depend upon its being 
 applicable or inapplicable to the social condition of the society into which it is 
 introduced." — A. G. Eichey. 
 
 " There has in general survived to the Irish farmer, through all vicissitudes, 
 in despite of the seeming or real veto of the law, in apparent defiance of political 
 economy, a living tradition of possessory right, such as belonged, in the more 
 primitive ages of society, to the status of the man who tilled the soil." — Report 
 of the Bessborougfi Commission. 
 
M. 
 
 PART I. 
 
 IRELAND THE ENEMY. 
 
UNIVERSITY 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 The Agrarian Community of the Irish Celts. 
 
 The genesis of Irish social and political organization is found, 
 said the late Sir Henry Maine, as in all the Aryan, Semitic, 
 and Uralian races, to lie in the Family group \ Amongst the 
 Irish Celts in the earliest times to which modern research 
 has penetrated, a social organization built upon the actual or 
 constructive kinship of members of the community, based on 
 the real or theoretical descent from a common ancestor, can be 
 traced. Such an organization finds its most perfect type in the 
 joint family of modern India, (composed of those persons who 
 would have taken part in the funeral ceremonies of the common 
 ancestor), and corresponds to the Agnatic family of the Romans^. 
 To the original conception of an organization of this nature the 
 idea of individual property in the land is totally foreign; the 
 rights of the individual being at most merely a more or less 
 temporary usufruct of the soil by consent of the family group, 
 the reversion remaining in the community. Peculiar interest, 
 moreover, attaches to the development of the Irish agrarian 
 system from the fact that the direct influence of that tremen- 
 dous legislative engine the Roman Law has been absent^, and 
 even its indirect influence has been so slight that it may fairly 
 be treated as unimportant ^ Practically independent of ex- 
 
 1 Early History of Institutions, pp. ^ Mr Pearson says, " Ireland ex- 
 65, 66. It is worthy of note that when piated dearly its independence of the 
 the first English emigrants settled in Roman dominion, the secret of its long 
 New England, they distributed them- anarchy being in fact that it was 
 selves in village communities. Christianized without being civilized." 
 
 2 Primitive Property, Emile de La- Hist, of Eng. during Early and Middle 
 veleye, p. 123. E. Hist, of Inst. pp. Ages, Vol. i. p. 516. 
 
 106, 107. ^ Sullivan's Intro, p. 5, Manners and 
 
 1—2 
 
4 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. 
 
 ternal pressure, primitive Aryan custom developed into a more 
 advanced stage, and the theory of the family was extended and 
 modified in the attempt to fit it to the needs of increasing 
 population \ In the Brehon Laws (which will be more fully 
 dealt with hereafter) exists a more or less fragmentary collec- 
 tion of some of the legal theory, if not practice, of this later 
 stage of growth. It is endeavoured in this chapter to trace 
 the expansion of the simple family system into the more com- 
 plicated social organization presented by the Brehon Code ; and 
 at the same time to mark the gradual development of separate 
 ownership in the land, which at this later period was already 
 being evolved from the original conception of corporate posses- 
 sion. 
 
 The Irish Celts, when ceasing to be nomad and settling 
 upon definite areas of land, exercised apparently a social eco- 
 nomy in which the possession of land may at first be deemed 
 an accidental feature ; cattle constituting the only property to 
 the possession of which much importance was attached, and 
 remaining, even when property in land was held an integral 
 item of the social system, the standard of value by which other 
 things were calculated^ It would seem that in the earliest 
 form of an ascertainable land system the head of the family 
 group made a yearly or triennial allotment of lands ^ to the 
 members of the family for the purpose of cultivation, and at the 
 end of this period a redistribution was made. No right what- 
 ever was acquired by the allottee to the piece of land thus held 
 
 Customs of Ancient Irish, E. O'Curry. forming the Duthaig fine, or the sept 
 
 Of the Brehon Law it may also be said in its narrower sense, as found in the 
 
 that it was uninfluenced by Roman law, Brehon laws. 
 
 despite that certain Roman law max- 2 Celtic Scotland, Vol. iii. c. iv. 
 
 ims are incorporated in the text, and Skene. 
 
 that a Roman jurisconsult is men- ^ Prof. Sullivan and the writers of 
 tioned, for these slight touches may be the school who have endeavoured with 
 • ascribed to contact with Churchmen. but little foundation to magnify the 
 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 55. civilization of the early Irish Celts, 
 1 To this modification of the origi- hold that the tribe-land was universally 
 nal theory of family unity we may held in severalty at the time of the 
 ascribe the curious division of the Brehon laws, and that these periodical 
 Irish family into the Geilfine, Deir- allotments extended only to the corn- 
 fine, larfine, and Indfine, together mon lands. 
 
I] 
 
 OF THE IRISH CELTS. 
 
 for a year, he had merely by consent the usufruct thereof for 
 such time. The tribal group is but an enlarged model of the 
 family group, the members of the original cluster being repre- 
 sented by the allied sub-groups. Thus in its full expansion 
 the tribe or fine^ is found, with a chieftain or king at its head, 
 formed of an aggregate of groups each a miniature of the larger 
 tribe, and in their turn composed of other clusters until the 
 lowest item of the social organization is reached in the family 
 group or sept'^ Such sept being the unit of a society^ in 
 which an individual as distinct from a member of a family 
 group had scarcely in theory a proprietary existence. The 
 mode of dealing with the land gradually underwent change, 
 the yearly allotment passed into an allotment for life, the 
 reversion being in the sept. It should be remembered, however, 
 that in early times the portions of land allotted to members 
 
 ^ "The term 'fine' or 'family' is 
 used to designate all subdivisions of 
 Irish society, the tribe in its largest 
 extent, the sept or the sub-tribe," 
 Systems of Landliolding ^ C. D. Field, 
 p. 239. 
 
 Sir H. Maine held that the 'fine' 
 translated ' tribe ' in the Corns Bescna 
 was the sept. In the Tripartite Life 
 of St Patrick, where information might 
 have been hoped for, no direct light is 
 thrown upon the subject (see Vol. i. 
 p. clxviii.). 
 
 - Mr F. Seebohm says, "A sept 
 consisted of a number of actual or re- 
 puted Uood relations bearing the same 
 family names, and bound together by 
 other and probably more artificial ties, 
 such as common liability for the pay- 
 ment of eric, or blood fines." The 
 English Village Community^ c. vii. 
 p. 219. The exact model of the sept 
 is the joint family of modern India. 
 It is a corporate, self-supporting unit, 
 with " a perpetual existence like a so- 
 ciety in mortmain;" it is "a juristic 
 person and holds and acquires pro- 
 perty ;" its continuity depends on the 
 
 land occupied by it, " but it is not 
 merely a land-owning body, it has 
 live chattels and dead chattels distin- 
 guished from those of individual tribes- 
 men. Nor is it purely a cultivating 
 body, it may follow a professional 
 calling." Maine, Laveleye, Field. 
 
 From surveys of the country as late 
 as the year 1600, in which the names 
 of tenants are given, it is evident that 
 they were blood relations, "with a care- 
 fully preserved genealogy guarding the 
 fact of their relationship and conse- 
 quent position in the tribe. ' ' Seebohm. 
 " Survey of County Monaghan in 33 
 Eliz." Inquisitiones Cancellariae Hi- 
 berniae ii. pp. xxi. and xxiii. and ex- 
 tract therefrom quoted at p. 216, See- 
 bohm. 
 
 3 Mr Skene, however, holds that the 
 tuath or tribe preceded the sept, and 
 ascribes the origin of the fine or sept, 
 which is found at the time of the 
 Brehon Laws, not in any way to a 
 development of family relations, but 
 to what may be termed the wealth- 
 family of the Bo-Aire and his depend- 
 ents. See Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. 171. 
 
6 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. 
 
 of the tribe would form but a comparatively small portion 
 of the tribal territory, which would be divided into (1) pas- 
 turage ground held by the tribe in common, (2) unoccupied and 
 waste lands at first common property but in later times much 
 trenched upon by the chief, (3) the usufructuary allotments 
 of arable land\ 
 
 The mode of succession to land at the time of the Brehon 
 Laws was the custom of Gavelkind ^ by which on the death 
 of a member of the sept the portion of land which had been 
 allotted to him passed back into the general stock and the chief 
 made a redistribution. It is pointed out by Mr Seebohm that 
 the clustering of households so frequently met with in the early 
 Irish surveys, and the runrig^ form of the open field allotments, 
 were the natural modes of conducting a co-operative and shift- 
 ing agriculture*. In the ancient Irish law it is clear that 
 though the tribe is settled on the land, it yet holds, and is in- 
 fluenced by, ideas derived from the time when kinship and not 
 property was the bond between its members — this being the 
 explanation of Gavelkind succession. It is only necessary to 
 imagine the bonds of kinship further relaxed, and the connec- 
 tion of each family to the land strengthened till the tempo- 
 rary allotment to the household has become its actual property, 
 
 1 See Skene, Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. finny apr^s le mort de chescun terte- 
 139. nant que avait competent portion de 
 
 2 And as regards the chieftain " Ta- terre, assemblait tout le sept, et aiant 
 nistry," this will be dealt with later. mis touts lour possessions en hotch- 
 Gavelkind is from gabhail-cine=ac- pot fesait nouvel partition de tout : en 
 cepted from the tribe. Although ori- quel partition il ne assignait a les fils 
 ginally upon a death all the lands in de cesty que mourust le portion que 
 the sept were re-distributed, eventually lour pere avait; mes il allotait al chas- 
 it would seem that only the lands held cun del sept solonque son antiquity." 
 by the deceased were so dealt with. Davies' Reports : Le Irish Custome de 
 (Field.) The custom of Gavelkind was Gavelkind (quoted Laveleye). 
 
 thus described by Sir John Davies — ^ Eundale, runrigg or runacre (said 
 "Issint les terresde nature de gavelkind to be derived from Celtic roinn-diol, 
 ne fueront partibles enter le prochen i.e. having a share in distribution: 
 heires males de cesty qui morust sei- Laveleye) ... Similar systems prevailed 
 sie, mes enter touts les males de son till quite lately in the Scottish High- 
 sept en cest manner. Le canfinny, ou lands. E. Hist, of Inst. p. 101. 
 chief del sept, fesait toutes les parti- 4 English Village Community, Sec- 
 tions per son discretion. Cest can- bohm, p. 230. 
 
I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 7 
 
 to see the basis of the English custom of Gavelkind which is 
 often erroneously contrasted with the archaic Irish mode of 
 succession bearing the same name. But though this custom 
 of Gavelkind (in its large sense) was still at the time of the 
 Brehon Laws generally accepted as the theory of succession to 
 land, and the proprietary rights were theoretically vested in the 
 community, there is evidence to prove that much individual 
 property actually existed ; so much so indeed that at the end of 
 the 10th or beginning of the 11th century the Irish people 
 were in a state of transition from common property to several 
 ownership, the Brehon writers themselves rather favouring the 
 theory of private property \ 
 
 Many causes went to produce this alteration in the nature 
 and conception of ownership. As a primary factor in causing 
 the change stands the increase of population, aided by the fact 
 that in certain instances the temporary occupation of tribe-land 
 by the individual tended, through the sufferance or consent of 
 che community, to become permanent^: lasting possession being 
 probably generated by the scarcity of land rendering a higher 
 degree of cultivation necessary than the periodical division 
 every year or every three years would allow, and the extra 
 labour expended fostering the idea of property I In addition, 
 a change which took place in the social organization of society, 
 namely the increase in the power of the chief, had a large 
 influence in breaking up the archaic theory of communism in 
 the soil*. The original notion of Father of the community 
 
 1 The book of the Dun Cow (Lebor 2 ^_ [jist. of Inst. p. 95. 
 
 na Huidre) compiled in the 7th century ^ Prim. Prop. p. 125. 
 
 by the Abbot of Clanmacnois, known •* " It may now, however, be laid 
 
 to us in an Irish ms. of the year 1100, down without rashness that Property 
 
 says " Round the field there was neither in Land, as known to communities of 
 
 ditch, hedge, nor stone wall, and the the Aryan race, has had a twofold 
 
 land was not divided till came the origin. It has arisen partly from the 
 
 period of the sons of Aed Slane (7th disentanglement ofthe individual rights 
 
 cent.), but only smooth fields.... It was of the kindred or tribesmen from the 
 
 in consequence of the great number of collective rights of the Family or Tribe, 
 
 families at this time that divisions and partly from the growth and trans- 
 
 and boundaries of the soil were intro- mutation of the sovereignty of the 
 
 duced in Ireland." Seebohm, p. 225 Tribal Chief." E. Hist, of Imt. ip. 120. 
 and Prim. Prop. Laveleye, p. 125. 
 
8 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. 
 
 became merged in that of Leader of the clan, and even the idea 
 of kinship amongst members of the tribe was assimilated to 
 that of a bond of subjection to a common authority, in the 
 further growth of which idea lies the root of the pseudo-clanship 
 of the fuidhir tenants \ 
 
 In order to understand the position of the chief with regard 
 to the land it is necessary to appreciate the mode of succession 
 to the chieftaincy — as regulated by the custom of Tanistry. A 
 chief was elected for life by the whole tribe or sept, usually by 
 show of hands, and his successor was in most cases chosen in 
 the same way"^ during his lifetime. Though this successor 
 (who when elected was termed the ' Tanaist ') was nominally 
 supposed to be the next of blood who was eldest and worthiest ^ 
 it is easy to see how great weight the wishes of the existing 
 ruler would have in regulating the choice of the clan. It is 
 evident that a door was here opened for easy inroad on the 
 corporate ownership of the tribe-land. When the Tanaist was 
 a near relation of the then chief, landed property held by such 
 chief in his private capacity would be likely on his death to be 
 continued to his descendants with a lofty disregard of the 
 customs of Gavelkind. Moreover even if it were appropriated 
 by the Tanaist on his accession to the chieftaincy as being part 
 of the appanage of office, and thus his due by the custom of 
 Tanistry, it would by increasing the vassals and hence the 
 power of the new ruler render further depredation by him from 
 the tribe the more easy. The chief on election became, by 
 virtue of such election, the proprietor of a seigniory over all 
 
 1 Post, pp. 9, 17. =^ The Cain. Aigillne A. L. of I. Vol. 
 
 - Field, p. 242.... "When the claimant ii. p. 279 says *'The head of every 
 was powerful even the form of election tribe... should be the man of the tribe 
 was occasionally dispensed with. It is who is the most experienced, the most 
 hard to overrate the power of * the noble, the most wealthy, the wisest, 
 strong man armed ' in troublous times. the most learned, the most truly popu- 
 Strongbow himself is said to have been lar, the most powerful to oppose, the 
 raised to the post of Roydamna during most steadfast to sue for profits and 
 the lifetime of Dermot MacMurrough to be sued for losses." The chief- 
 and hence to have claimed to succeed taincy being elective, a power seems 
 him. Hume says " The usual title of also to have rested with the clan, and to 
 each petty sovereign was the murder have been sometimes exercised, of re- 
 ef his predecessor." moving a chief for mal-administra- 
 
I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 9 
 
 the lands of the tribe, and his power was greater still over the 
 waste-lands \ From these latter, indeed, more than from in- 
 equitable re-allotment of occupied tribe-lands, it is probable 
 that his accession of those allodiaP lands was made, which by 
 the facilities they offered for the support of his retainers and 
 servile dependents became the mainstay of his power and the 
 stepping-stone to increased conversion of tribal territory into 
 private property. The very nature of the tribal system fostered 
 this germ of despotism, for recurring once again to the archaic 
 theory of the family community, and endeavouring to realize 
 what was the position of a member who from any cause was 
 expelled from its charmed circle, it is found that becoming a 
 very Ishmael without a social, political, or legal existence no 
 course was open to him but to endeavour to assimilate himself 
 by some means to another kindred association. The only means 
 by which this could be accomplished was by becoming the per- 
 sonal retainer of some chief, who in return for his services 
 would give protection, and by subjection to whose authority 
 he would gain a pseudo-kinship with the members of the tribe. 
 In this way arose the class of Fuidhirs, strangers or fugitives 
 from other tribes ; and the tribal chief who extended his aegis 
 over the outcast would in all probability allot for his use a 
 portion of the waste-land of the tribe I Such land, held theo- 
 retically at the will of the tribe, but practically from the chief, 
 in return probably for military or agricultural service, soon 
 became looked upon as a portion of the chief's demesnes (if it 
 
 tion. See case of Donell O'Garmleay, subject E. Hist, of Inst. p. 93. 
 
 quoted p. 70, Vol. ii. of Ware's An- ^ It is surely justifiable to use this 
 
 tiquities of Ireland. term here. 
 
 1 Whilst dealing with the various ^ ^g jg pointed out by Mr Justice 
 causes that broke up the theory of Field, the 'Senchus Mor ' alludes to 
 common ownership and established three rents, a rack rent or extreme rent 
 severalty, it must be remembered that from one of a strange tribe (the Fuid- 
 on the waste-lands near the border, hir), a fair rent from one of the tribe, 
 cultivators of servile status were per- the stipulated rent paid alike by him 
 mitted to squat, and cultivating set- of the tribe and him of a strange tribe, 
 tlements of tribesmen occasionally Landholding and the relation of Land- 
 took possession thereof; in many of lord and Tenant in various countries. 
 these cases something resembling in- 2nd Ed. p. 240. See also E. Hist, of 
 dividual property arose. See on this Imt. 
 
10 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. 
 
 is admissible to use the English manorial term) ; and the abso- 
 lute dependence of the fuidhir tenant is well shown by the 
 passages in the Brehon Law^ sanctioning distress from a chief 
 who did not aid his fuidhir against injustice. 
 
 In addition to his seigniory over the lands of the tribe, and 
 his more extensive power over the waste-lands of the commu- 
 nity, the chief had also certain lands allotted to him in a special 
 way as appurtenant to his state, termed mensal lands, and these 
 descended from chief to chief according to the custom of 
 Tanistry as the appanage of office^. In these lands, separated 
 from the common stock to support the dignity of the chief- 
 taincy, is to be traced one of the very earliest signs of the 
 decay of the system of corporate possession by the tribe, and 
 in all probability the lever which opened the door to the 
 earliest instances of separate property. The great power pos- 
 sessed by the chief over the tribe and the unsettled state both 
 of society and law makes it apparent that the lands which were 
 given as an attribute of the chieftaincy as to a corporation sole 
 would be very liable to be retained by the nearest relatives of 
 the chieftain in private ownership on his death. 
 
 By the time of the Brehon Laws the power of the chief had 
 so increased over certain members of the tribe as to reduce 
 them to a position of dependence^ by the development of Saer 
 and Daer tenancy, with the result that the lands originally 
 occupied by them in ordinary common ownership with the rest 
 of the clan had come to be held in many cases at what is 
 equivalent to a rent. To properly understand the growth of 
 these tenancies it is necessary to bear in mind that despite any 
 amount of ultimate possession or control which was exercised 
 over the land by the head of the clan, the germ of his power 
 lay in the possession of cattle. These, the natural spoil of war 
 to the conquering chief, were in the early agricultural commu- 
 nity of more intrinsic value than land, of which there was at 
 first a surplusage* ; and it is in a great measure to the power 
 
 1 Sen. Mor {A. L. of I. Vol. i. pp. 125 System of Ireland, Law Quarterly Re- 
 and 139). view, 1887, pp. 135 and 136. O'Con- 
 
 2 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 92. nor Morris. 
 
 3 Much as the Patrician obtained ^ One is struck instantly in the 
 power over the Plebeian debtor. Land Brehon Law, with the immense import- 
 
I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 11 
 
 over a tribesman acquired by the chief to whom he was in- | 
 debted for a loan of cattle, that the origin of the idea of rent 
 for the soil may be traced \ ~^ 
 
 Saer and Daer stock tenancies are the names given to the 
 relation subsisting between chief and tribesman, when a loan 
 of cattle has been advanced by the former to the latter ; the 
 difference between Saer and Daer tenancy resting in the fact 
 that in the first where only a portion of the tenant's stock is 
 provided by the chief the tenant debtor remains a freeman, in 
 the latter where all the stock is found he becomes a villanus'' 
 or at any rate is in a semi-servile state. Such loans, probably 
 one of the most formidable agencies in increasing the power of 
 the chief, were it would appear largely imposed upon those who 
 being tribesmen were obliged to receive the charge from their 
 head^ and were always resorted to by those whose poverty pre- 
 vented the acquisition of cattle (that is of the means of tillage) 
 by independent means. The complicated rules of these tenancies 
 will be referred to later on whqn the enactments of the Brehon 
 Law will be more fully dealt with. Here they are only im- 
 portant in so far as they represent another factor in the 
 influences breaking down the theory of common ownership 
 of the soil by the clan, and laying the foundation of ownership 
 of land held from a chief. The inroad made by these tenancies 
 upon the original theory of tribal constitution becomes far 
 more apparent when it is found that they were not confined to 
 chief and tribesmen of one clan, but might be created between 
 
 ance attached to the possession of base wages from any man unless it be 
 
 cattle. his own will to do so, andT it is com- 
 
 1 Sir H. Maine held that the rent petent for him not to accept Saerrath 
 payable in the produce of the stock (free wages) from anyone but from a 
 and refections ultimately became a king, but he is not entitled to refuse 
 rent payable in respect of the land. the free wages of his king. Every 
 The stock lent was termed 'Taurcreic' man in the Tuath is bound to receive 
 and the food rent *Besa,' see E. Hist. the wages of the Eig Tuatha (king of 
 of Inst. p. 160, and Skene Vol. iii. the territory)," and says "Theoretical- 
 p. 146. ly speaking no freeman need become 
 
 2 Field, pp. 241 — 242. the dependent of another save the 
 
 3 Prof. Sullivan quotes the following king of his territory, but the condition 
 enactment of the Brehon Law. "It is of dependence was imposed upon him 
 competent for a man never to accept by the circumstances of his position." 
 
12 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. 
 
 members of different clans ; the tribesman of one becoming the 
 Daer-stock tenant of another. The social connection between 
 the chief and his tenants is stated in the Senchus Mor^ to be 
 "That he (the chief) is to give them stock and returnable 
 *seds,' and to protect them against every injustice that he is 
 able, and they are to render him victuals and labour, and 
 respect, and to return the 'seds' to his heir, or for his heir 
 where it is right (to do so). The chief has {power to pronounce) 
 judgment, and proof, and witness, upon his Daer-stock tenants ; 
 but his Saer-stock tenants can oppose them, and bear witness 
 against his tenants if they be impartial witnesses." These Saer 
 and Daer tenancies are also important in their bearing on the 
 modifications of the land system, for their tendency was un- 
 doubtedly to reduce the debtor to vassalage ; and in this fact 
 probably lies the explanation of the origin of many of the 
 complicated servile groups with which we are confronted in the 
 Brehon Laws and in all early Irish history^. 
 
 The theory of common ownership recognized no right of 
 alienation by the individual of his share of the tribe-land ^, and 
 even in the Brehon Laws this doctrine holds, " every tribesman 
 is able to keep his tribe-land, he is not to sell it, or alienate it, 
 or conceal it, or give it to pay for crimes or contracts "*. The 
 original universality of the rule was, however, infringed by 
 exceptions and in certain cases a portion at least of his tribe- 
 land might be alienated by the tribesman by grant, contract, or 
 bequest. As regards the property which his own effort had ac- 
 quired, a larger power of alienation was possessed by the tribes- 
 man than he had over that obtained by allotment. Again in 
 the Cortis Bescna a still further distinction is drawn between 
 the property which a man has acquired by special industry 
 and that which is merely the produce of the land in the ordi- 
 nary course of husbandry, the former being regarded as more 
 
 1 Ancient Laws of Ireland, Vol. ii. ' commendation ' are thus produced." 
 p. 345. E. Hist, of Inst. p. 158. 
 
 2 "It is by taking stock that the ^ g^ve by consent of the corn- 
 free Irish tribesman becomes the Ceile munity. 
 
 or Kyle, the vassal or man of his chief, ^ A. L. of I. Vol. ii. p. 283, and see 
 
 owing him not only rent but service E. Hist, of Inst. p. 108. 
 and homage. The exact effects of 
 
I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 13 
 
 particularly his own property and hence his right of alienation 
 being greater over it. An examination of the Brehon Laws 
 shows that there can be little doubt that the growth of this 
 power of alienation found if not its origin at least its most 
 fostering element in the influence of the Church \ How early 
 such influence began to work it is impossible to say, for there is 
 negative evidence that for some time after the arrival of St 
 Patrick Christianity had not spread throughout Ireland I Still 
 it is certain that beginning from about the time of St Patrick 
 the ecclesiastical element entered the Irish legal system, and 
 many of the increased facilities for the alienation of land, and 
 much of the advancement of the idea of the binding nature of 
 contract are due to the efforts of the monks. The Christian 
 influence on the law tended in the direction of increasing the 
 property of the Church, with a view to which it favoured free- 
 dom of alienation. Thus despite that the Brehon Law lays 
 down that 'no tribesman is to sell, alienate, or conceal his 
 tribe-land or to give it to pay for his crimes or contracts V yet 
 under certain circumstances exceptions were made, and in its 
 original conception the grantee contemplated is without doubt 
 the Church* which is indebted to this source for its term on 
 lands. 
 
 The position of the Church with regard to the land at the 
 time of the Brehon Laws is thus explained in the Senchus 
 Mor^, " The social connection which subsists between the church 
 
 1 A curious side light is thrown he was killed by the sun and wind, 
 on this by the fact that in the Tri- " Laeghaire, son of Niall, died 
 partite Life of St Patrick, the word for On the side of Caissi, green its 
 bequest occurs four times and always land ; 
 
 in connection with ecclesiastics. The elements of God, whose guar- 
 
 2 For example see a passage in the antee he had violated, 
 Annals of the Four Masters, Vol. i. Inflicted the doom of death upon 
 pp. 143, 145 (quoted in Pritchard's the king." 
 
 Physical History of Mankind, p. 140), This quatrain is quoted in The Four 
 
 where it is stated that Laeghaire, the Masters, p. 145, and also in Lehor na 
 
 son of Niall, having been in the year Huidre, but the author is unknown. 
 
 457 taken captive in a battle against ^ A. L. of I. Vol. ii. p. 283. 
 
 the inhabitants of Leinster, swore by ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 108. 
 
 the sun and the wind that he would ^ Sen. Mor (A. L. of I. Vol. ii. 
 
 never again demand a tribute for his pp. 345 and 347). 
 cows. The oath having been violated 
 
14 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. 
 
 and its tenants of ecclesiastical lands is, preaching and offer- 
 ing: — and requiem is due from the church to its tenants of 
 ecclesiastical lands, and the receiving of every son for instruc- 
 tion, and of every (such) tenant to right repentance ; tithes, and 
 first fruits, and alms, are due of them to her, and full honor 
 price when they are in strong health, and one-third honor price 
 at the time of death ; and the church has (the power of pro- 
 nouncing judgment), and proof, and witness upon its tenants 
 of ecclesiastical land, both Saer-stock tenants and Daer-stock 
 tenants ; and upon every other layman, even though he be a 
 Saer-stock tenant of ecclesiastical lands, unless there is another 
 church of equal dignity claiming him." This extract shows 
 conclusively how large a temporal power had been acquired by 
 the Church, and it is plain how potent an influence it must have 
 exerted in moulding the Brehon Law. It is far from improbable 
 also that the power of the Church was felt in the local laws 
 which influenced petty communities to a larger extent than is 
 shown by the laws of Tara. Mr Skene, who lays stress on the 
 laxity of sexual relations in the earliest times of Irish history, 
 would also ascribe in the main to the influence of the Christian 
 church^ the practical creation of the paternal power ^, and would 
 defer till this time the real existence of the family group with 
 the father as its head. It seems probable, however, even if 
 the marriage bond was not held binding, that he has under- 
 rated the eagerness with which sons (the warriors of the future) 
 and daughters (by whose means valuable alliances could be 
 contracted) would be claimed by the father as members of his 
 family I 
 
 Though the various causes'* which tended to break down 
 the original theory of family unity, to disintegrate collective 
 
 1 The Early Irish Ecclesiastical the legitimation not only of the 
 Law limited marriage relations strictly. bastard, but of the adulterine bastard, 
 Canones S. Patricii {Councils and Ec- and measures the compensation to be 
 clesiastical documents of Great Britain paid to the putative father." E. Hist, 
 and Ireland, A. W. Hodden and W. of Inst. p. 59. 
 
 Stubbs). ii. Synod xxv — xxviii. See ■* The influence of the more ad- 
 
 The Celtic Church by F. E. Warren. vanced civilization of foreign nations 
 
 2 Skene's Celt. Scot. Vol. in. p. 138. was scarcely felt by the early Irish com- 
 
 3 " The 'Book of Aicill' provides for munity, and is only treated of in two 
 
I.] OF THE IRISH CELTS. 15 
 
 ownership and to establish the theory of several possession, 
 have been touched on, it must not be imagined that in the 
 Brehon Laws ownership in severalty was recognized as the rule. 
 On the contrary the property, social, and juristic rights of indi- 
 viduals are still theoretically merged in the system of the 
 family group, but the numerous exceptions which are apparent 
 show clearly the effects of the attacks made on the original 
 conception of ownership. There is clearly traceable the pro- 
 gress of what may be termed the natural feudalization of the 
 land, retarded indeed by the want of a strong centralized 
 government and doomed never to be consummated in the 
 natural order of things, (since the Brehon Law was roughly 
 rooted up, and a more advanced system thrust on a nation unfit 
 to receive it) but 'Undeniably present. 
 
 Before commencing an examination of the extant tracts of 
 the Brehon Law it is necessary to treat more fully than has yet 
 been done of the relation of the landholding classes between 
 themselves in early Irish society. 
 
 In the earliest times the inhabitants of Ireland are found 
 divided into the two great classes, free and unfree\ and these 
 two classes seem to have been divided into many grades. 
 Amongst the free the division is one which may almost be 
 termed that of the " classes and masses." The former order, the 
 Aires, being again subdivided into the two classes of (1) Flaths 
 and (2) Bo- Aires ^ The Flaths represented an aristocracy of 
 
 instances in this essay (1) where the 
 influence of the Church is incidentally 
 dealt with in this and the following 
 chapter, (2) where the effect of the 
 establishment of the Colony of the Pale 
 is treated of in chapters III. and IV. 
 
 1 " The acts of the Council of 
 Armagh in 1171 show that there 
 had been a custom of buying Anglo- 
 Saxons from merchants robbers and 
 pirates ; for it was decreed ' ut Angli 
 ubique per insulam servitatis vinculo 
 mancipati in pristinam revocentur 
 libertatem.' " (See Sigerson quoting 
 Girald. Camb. Expugnatio Hibernica, 
 L. I. c. xviii.) Some very ancient Canons 
 
 of the Church (quoted c. 20 Ware) also 
 point to this, and we learn from Seyer's 
 History of Bristol that slaves were ex- 
 ported from England even as late as 
 the reign of King John. See also 
 William of Malmesbury de Vit Wlstani. 
 In the Book of Rights, printed by the 
 Celtic Society, p. 174, and quoted by 
 Skene in Vol. iii. p. 140, the legendary 
 origin of the class of the unfree is 
 given. In the main slavery was due 
 to the successive waves of conquest 
 and to the effect of internal wars. 
 
 - See Sullivan's Intro, to O'Curry, 
 pp. c. and ci. 
 
16 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY [CHAP. 
 
 birth, their wealth lying in land and their rank being hereditary; 
 whilst the Bo-Aires or Cow- Aires represented an aristocracy 
 of wealth, or those who from the amount of their possessions in 
 cattle rose above the ordinary tribesman, and whose descendants 
 under certain circumstances were capable of rising to the rank 
 of Flaths. These two classes of Aires alone possessed to the 
 full the rights of freemen \ but the possession of sufficient 
 wealth entitled any free native to become a Bo-Aire. The 
 ordinary free tribesman was the Fer Midba, or inferior man, 
 and of this class there are two divisions (1) those over the age 
 of 14 and under 20, who though emancipated were not in pos- 
 session of their full privileges, and (2) those over the age of 20, 
 entitled to a separate residence and a share of the tribe-land I 
 
 When the tribesman had received a loan of cattle he became 
 a member of the class of Ceiles. The Ceiles were divided into 
 the Saer, that is free, Ceiles and the Daer or base Ceiles. The 
 relation of these two classes to the chief to whom they were 
 indebted for the loan of cattle has been already remarked under 
 the short description given of Saer and Daer stock holdings, 
 and will be more fully dealt with later. Although the Daer 
 Ceiles were base tenants they were yet possessed of certain 
 definite rights in the tribe and in the tribal territory, and in 
 this were widely separated from the servile classes of the 
 Bothacks, Sencleiths and Fuidhirs whose rights were few, and 
 who were almost in a state of complete servitude ^ These latter 
 classes cultivated what in default of a better word may be 
 termed the chief's demesnes, and possessed no political rights. 
 
 " The Bothacks* or Cottiers, Saer and Daer, had a right of 
 settlement, served the land noble as hired and farm labourers 
 and performed menial services^" The Sencleiths appear to have 
 been old adherents of the Flath, the descendants of old and 
 
 ^ See Sullivan's Intro, to O'Curry, Bothacks seem to have been possessed 
 
 p. cix. of no property save a cabin on the lands 
 
 2 See Skene's Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. of the Flath whom they served ; the 
 143. ' Daer Bothacks were farm labourers. 
 
 3 Sullivan's Intro, to O'Curry, p. cxv. ^ Sigerson's History of Land Tenures 
 * Bothack fromBoth, a shed or cabin. and Land Glasses in Ireland, p. 9. 
 
 Prof. Sullivan says that the Saer 
 
L] of the IRISH CELTS. 17 
 
 privileged servants or persons who at some time by favour had 
 acquired a right to settle on the demesne \ The Fuidhir or 
 refugee tenants have been treated of before, but it should be 
 noticed that a great point of difference existed between them 
 and the classes of Bothacks and Sencleiths; for whilst the latter 
 formed part of the affiliated family or clan known in the Brehon 
 Law as the ' Fine Flatha,' and were entitled as of right to susten- 
 ance, habitation, and to the usufruct of the soil, the former class 
 were strangers and outcasts, their rights in the clan, if any, 
 being based on a contract with its chief. The free Fuidhirs 
 indeed possessed in some degree the rights of freemen, being in 
 reality strangers from other tribes, who, in consideration of only 
 holding their Fuidhir tenancy of the land from year to year^, 
 were allowed to retain certain rights. The Daer Fuidhirs on 
 the other hand^ were in all respects in a position of the most 
 servile dependence and were the victims of great hardships, 
 their rights and liabilities being in almost all cases merged in 
 those of the Flath on whom they were dependent, and whose 
 chattels to all intents and purposes they were. These Daer 
 Fuidhirs were mostly prisoners taken in war^, escaped criminals 
 who had been given shelter, defaulting debtors, and outcasts of 
 every kind. It seems, however, that a man might voluntarily 
 become a Daer Fuidhir, and that he might become so for a 
 limited number of years ; while a family of this class who 
 remained nine times nine years on the land became entitled to 
 rank with the Sencleiths. The following table purports to 
 show the relation of the social orders of the tribe ^ or Tuath. 
 
 1 For example mercenaries. diffidence the subject being much in- 
 
 2 Prof . Sullivan says " If he entered volved. For authorities see Skene, 
 into longer engagements than one Vol. iii. p. 142 — 147, also Ancient Laws, 
 year with another than his own chief Vol. iv. p. 299, also Sigerson and Sul- 
 he lost his rights and became per- livan. The classes of the Bo-Aires of 
 manentlya Fuidhir." Intro. to O'Curry, which the Aire coisring "who repre- 
 p. cxxv. sented the people before king and sy- 
 
 3 The Brehon Law draws a very nod " was the highest, and the Ogaire or 
 sharp line of demarcation between the 'young lord' the lowest, differed merely 
 Saer and Daer Fuidhir. in their degrees of wealth. The classes 
 
 * St Patrick was of this class when of the Flaths are based on the number 
 
 he was first brought to Ireland. of Ceile tenants each possessed, the 
 
 ^ This table is put forward with Aire-forgaill being the most important 
 
 M. 2 
 
18 
 
 THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITY OF THE IRISH CELTS. 
 
 Free 
 
 1. The Ri or king 
 
 2. The Tanaist 
 
 3. The Aires 
 
 Flaths 
 
 Bo-Aires 
 
 fAi 
 JAi 
 
 Aire-forgaill 
 
 Aire-tuise 
 
 L 4. The Fer Midba 
 
 Unfree « 
 
 r Receive stock 
 from the Ri 
 j direct ^ 
 
 I Receive stock r Aire-ard 
 I from a •) Aire-echta 
 
 L Flath ( Aire-desa 
 
 Aire-coisring 
 
 Ferfothla 
 
 Bruighfer 
 
 Febhsa 
 
 Aitheck or Athreba 
 'L Ogaire 
 Saer Ceile 
 
 Semi-servile ( Daer Ceile 
 
 r Possessing some rights in f 
 
 the tribe, but none in J Saer Bothacks 
 
 tribal territory only in ] Saer Sencleiths 
 chief's demesne [_ 
 
 Possessing very few rights ] Daer Bothacks 
 Servile -i ^^ *^® *^^^® i Daer Sencleiths 
 
 the 
 
 Grad 
 
 Flath 
 
 the 
 
 Grad 
 
 Feine 
 
 the Fine 
 
 Flatha 
 
 or 
 
 affiliated 
 
 family or 
 
 clan. 
 
 T).^«c«««,•v,., ^^ ^,-„v,+c ;r, fv,« I Saer Fuidhirs (had some rights as 
 Possessmg no rights m the J fj-gemen). 
 
 ^^ ^ ' Daer Fuidhirs (no rights whatever). 
 
 and being also probably the Flath 
 Geilfine or Geilfine chief. Though the 
 above table gives the organization of a 
 complete tribe, such tribe would not 
 probably stand alone but would be 
 
 linked by certain ties to other Tuaths, 
 and the body thus constituted would 
 represent that larger tribe known as 
 the Mortuath. 
 
CHAPTER II. 
 
 The Beehon Law. 
 
 Having sketched the various causes which chiefly tended 
 in Ireland to mould into a more complex form the original 
 conception of ownership by the clan, and the disintegrating 
 influences which tended to develop ownership in severalty, it 
 is proposed in this chapter to examine more carefully the exact 
 nature of land holding as recognized by the Brehon Laws. 
 
 These Laws were the work of a particular class — the Bre- 
 hons (Brithemain), a hereditary caste of lawyers. It has been 
 suggested that these Brehons were substantially identical with 
 the class of Druids found amongst the Celts of the Continent ^ 
 and it may be that on the introduction of Christianity the 
 Irish Druids concentrated their attention on the study and ex- 
 pansion of the laws, a subject which had formerly been only a 
 portion of their duties I This supposition goes far towards 
 accounting for a great mass of semi-barbarous and semi-chris- 
 tian but altogether religious doctrine in the secular Brehon 
 Law. It is specially noticeable as affording an explanation of 
 the comparatively insignificant relation of the sanctions to 
 various offences by suggesting the existence, at the time of 
 the inception of the rules ^, of a moral sanction forming the 
 understood complement of each material enactment and reme- 
 dying its deficiencies. 
 
 1 See E. Hist, of Inst. p. 35. ^ Notice on this subject the late Sir 
 
 2 The Sen. Mor ascribes the good H. Maine's remarks on " Sitting 
 judgments of the Brehon Law to the Dharna," and the statement in the 
 influence of the Holy Spirit on just Sen. Mor {A. L. of I. Vol. i. p. 113) 
 men who were in the island of Erin that notice and fasting precede dis- 
 before its conversion. A. L. of I. In- tress in the case of a chief. 
 
 tro. Vol. I. p. viii. 
 
 2—2 
 
20 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 Generally of Royal blood and standing in the relation of ad- 
 viser to the chief ^ while in many cases little if at all his inferior 
 in prestige^; the representatives of culture as opposed to crass 
 ignorance, and claiming through St Patrick a semi-inspired 
 origin for their legal rules', the Brehons in the earlier phases 
 of Irish history possessed in themselves, and transmitted to 
 their rules, an authority which it is hard for those trained in 
 modern ideas to realize. The weight attaching to the dicta of 
 the Brehon was the more remarkable as the system was based 
 on mere voluntary references to arbitration*, and as the sanction 
 was a factor conspicuous mainly by its absence or insufficiency ; 
 while even when existent it appears to have been irregularly 
 and intermittently enforced owing to the want of a strong cen- 
 tralized government. 
 
 The great antiquity of the system whose legal rules of social 
 relations and public polity the Brehon Laws profess to expound 
 and regulate, render it a matter of deep regret that there is a 
 scarcity of ancient Irish MSS. The limited amount of authentic 
 documents, however, is no matter of wonder when it is re- 
 membered that anarchy reigned supreme in early Irish history, 
 and that the absence of walled towns and stone buildings ren- 
 dered the preservation of manuscripts difficult ; while, in addi- 
 tion, during the earlier part of the 18th century it was a serious 
 matter to be as much as found in possession of an Irish book^. 
 The Brehon Laws, as far as extant, consist of certain tracts, the 
 text of which is glossed and expanded by later commentaries. 
 Commissioners were appointed for the purpose of selecting and 
 translating the Ancient Laws of Ireland, and the four volumes 
 published by them contain translations of the Senchus Mor 
 with its subtracts ^ the book of Aicill, the Crith Gabhlach, and 
 
 1 A. L. of I. Vol. IV. p. 341. 4 See — in one of the prefaces to 
 
 2 " For the king excels, for he can 3rd Vol. of Ancient Laws. In the 
 decide against every kind of person Sen. Mor it is stated that any foreigner 
 except those of the two orders of re- or stranger was entitled to be judged 
 ligion and learning who are of equal by any Brehon he might choose, 
 rank with himself." Sen. Mor, Gloss. 4. L. o/I. Vol. i. p. 7. 
 
 ^. L. o/I. Vol. I. p. 85. 5 guUivan's Intro, to O'Curry, p. 
 
 3 See the account given by the Sen. xix. 
 
 Mor of the origin of the Brehon Law. ^ The Senchus Mor is divided into 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 21 
 
 certain smaller tracts on judgments of co-tenancy, of divisions of 
 land, of divisions of the tribe and territory, of crimes, of rights 
 of water and so forth, with a tract on bee judgments. The 
 date of the ancient law tracts is very uncertain ; the Senchus 
 Mor is stated in the Annals of the four Masters to date at 
 438 A.D., but the principal extant Brehon manuscripts are pro- 
 bably not older than the 14th century, some being even as 
 recent as the beginning of the 15th\ The obsolete form of 
 language of much of their text, however, and the portions of 
 old versified law embedded in it, point to a probability of these 
 manuscripts being in the main transcripts from older writings, 
 many of the glosses being as much translations as explanations^. 
 But even taking this into ' consideration the language in which 
 the manuscripts are written will not carry us back much 
 farther than the middle of the 9th century^, and the late Sir 
 Henry Maine thought that the dates of the Senchus Mor and 
 the book of Aicill were the 11th and 10th centuries respectively. 
 The Senchus Mor itself indeed claims to have been coeval with 
 St Patrick; and Professor Sullivan argues from the internal 
 
 (1) the law of distress, (2) Services of for my soul. This is Christmas night, 
 
 Hostage Sureties, (3) Fosterage, (4) and on this night I place myself under 
 
 the two laws of tenure Saer-Stock the protection of the King of Heaven 
 
 (Cain Law) and Daer- Stock (Cain and earth, beseeching that He will 
 
 Aigillne), (5) social connexions, (6) bring me and my friends safe through 
 
 customary law (Corns Bescna). The this plague." 
 
 remainder is lost but is supposed to ^ Prof. Sullivan instances the case 
 
 have consisted of a tract on fines for of Druim Gall, a legal scribe in the 
 
 stealing from a church or termon county of Clare between 1509 — 1511, 
 
 lands. who confessed he could not understand 
 
 1 Dr O'Donovan translated a mar- the organization or functions of the 
 
 ginal note which purports to have been ancient courts of Ireland (at this date 
 
 written in 1350 on one of the Dublin the Irish laws were still in force in 
 
 manuscripts of the Sen. Mor to show Clare, which was the last part of Ire- 
 
 that it existed at that time. It runs land where the judgment of a Brehon 
 
 " One thousand three hundred ten and was delivered) and says, "Here we 
 
 forty years from the birth of Christ to have decisive evidence of a consider- 
 
 this night ; and this is the second year able lapse of time between the period 
 
 since the coming of the plague into when the courts were held in their 
 
 Ireland. I have written this in the full state and the beginning of the 16th 
 
 twentieth year of my age. I am Hugh, century." Intro, to O'Curry, p. xv. 
 
 son of Conor Mac Egan, and whoever ^ ^^ jj^gt qJ j^f^ p. 12 ; Sullivan's 
 
 reads it let him offer a prayer of mercy Intro, to O'Curry, p. xvi and xvii. 
 
22 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 state of Ireland after the commencement of the Danish wars 
 that the laws must be prior to the beginning of the 9th century, 
 surmising that the three centuries after St Patrick (practically 
 the only period of even comparative tranquillity which the early 
 history of Ireland records) were the parents of the Brehon Laws. 
 But it is open to doubt whether legal activity will only co- 
 exist with political quiescence. If this is indeed the date of 
 the Brehon Laws being first committed to writing, their codifi- 
 cation may rather be ascribed to the stimulus given to intellec- 
 tual activity by the educational influences of the Church. 
 
 The early Irish law has many strong points of similarity 
 with the laws of Wales ^ subject, however, to the important 
 difference that the influence of the to some extent authoritative 
 central government, which has fixed its seal on the Welsh laws, 
 is absent in the Brehon code. The comparison nevertheless is 
 of value as illustrating with much clearness that the alleged 
 differences between Aryan sub-races are rather differences in 
 their degrees of development than essential discrepancies ^ The 
 Brehon Law, despite its pretensions to being a code, is rather 
 " an accretion of rules which have clustered round an older 
 nucleus ^" portions of the ancient versified law being, as has 
 been stated, incorporated in the Senchus Mor and the book of 
 Aicill. The late Sir Henry Maine held that probably each 
 tract was the property of some individual legal school and exhi- 
 bited its particular tenets*. In support of this it should be 
 remembered that these laws were not in reality a " legislative 
 structure," but were composed of the dicta of certain learned 
 Brehons^ upon sets of facts, either submitted to them or hypo- 
 thetically stated by them. This juridical interpretation stood 
 alone as the source of the Brehon Law, and bears a strong surface 
 
 1 See Ancient Laws of Wales, pub. judgment, e.g. " Sean, son of Aighe, 
 by Comm. ; History of Wales, by John passed the first judgment concerning 
 Jones. distress." Sen. Mor, A. L. of I. Vol, 
 
 2 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 96. i. p. 79. 
 
 3 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 10. ' ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 24, instancing 
 ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 16, and this the book of Aicill, by its own statement 
 
 would perhaps account for the way in composed of the judgments of two Bre- 
 which stress is laid in many cases on hons, Cormac and Cennfaeladh. 
 the name of a Brehon who passed a 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 23 
 
 analogy to the " responsa prudentum " of the Roman law, but 
 the difference caused by the absence in the former case of the 
 machinery of the courts and the sanctioning power of a cen- 
 tralized government prevents any true similarity. 
 
 It is a matter of great difficulty to know what stress to lay 
 upon individual statements in the tracts, for in not a few cases 
 the rules have evidently been constructed through certain 
 given facts having suggested a number of hypothetical cases to 
 the mind of the Brehon, upon which, though the law is laid 
 down with great nicety and assurance, it is hard to imagine it 
 possessed of a binding force. In the absence of that authority 
 which can only be existent in conjunction with a strong central- 
 ized government, bald statements of supposititious law\ not 
 sanctioned by immemorial custom, could scarcely have carried 
 any widespread authority. Not a few of the cases given are so 
 trivial as to strongly suggest that they were merely illustrative 
 examples used by the Brehon to instruct his pupil in the ex- 
 pansion of particular rules I This theory of development also 
 possesses inherent probability, for had the aim of the Brehon 
 lawyer been directed to ascertaining general principles instead 
 of particular applications, a more advanced law would have 
 been obtained, but the greatest proof of the genuine antiquity 
 of the system would have been lost. 
 
 The difficulty of justly estimating the relative value of the 
 statements of these archaic laws is increased by the fact that 
 a large proportion of their contents have palpably been evolved 
 by successive generations; partly from the pre-existing law 
 tenets, either oral or written, of the founder of the school, but 
 also partly from the real or imaginary needs of increasing popu- 
 lation, enlarged learning, and more diffused culture. These 
 later additions have been sheltered under the cloak of the 
 founder's supposed semi-divine^ infallibility, and have been 
 
 1 "Much of the commentary is con- 3 «(The early Brehon, possessing in 
 fessedly speculative, and does not re- his own breast the whole law, assumed 
 present any existing customary law." a mysterious character, and was treated 
 A. L. of I. Intro. Vol. iii. p. x. as an inspired or quasi-divine person- 
 
 2 This is particularly noticeable in age." A. L. of I. Intro. Vol. iii. p. 
 the tract on bee judgments. xxxi. 
 
24 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 incorporated into his system by what may almost be termed 
 mental ' commendation \' Another difficulty also is met with 
 at the outset of an enquiry into the Brehon Law in the ambiguity 
 of the meaning of the terms used : thus, to take a well-known 
 example, the word 'fine' is used (1) to denote those related 
 within certain degrees of consanguinity, (2) the lord and his 
 relatives together with his dependent Ceiles and Fuidhirs, 
 (3) the whole tribe in its broadest sense. The amount of con- 
 fusion caused by this looseness of expression can be better 
 imagined than described. 
 
 In the preceding chapter the classes of society which appear 
 to have been in existence at the time of the Brehon Laws were 
 dealt with, and the more or less complete disuse of the original 
 practice of common possession of the tribe-land was traced. 
 Turning now to the period of the fullest development of the 
 archaic code it is striking how seemingly complex a social system 
 is revealed, when the simplicity of the tribal system as described 
 by Sir John Davies so many centuries later is remembered. The 
 native land law recognized by the Attorney-General of James 
 the First will be dealt with in a subsequent chapter, but it is 
 perhaps possible that the explanation of its apparent dis- 
 crepancies with the scheme revealed in the Brehon Law is to 
 be found in the fact that Sir John Davies was content to deal 
 with the broad outlines of the case presented to him, while many 
 of the provisions of the ancient laws were theoretical rather than 
 practical. The ancient Irish land system, when viewed in the 
 light of the Brehon Laws, shows the 'Tuath,' or territorial 
 possession of the tribe, divided into the following parts ^ — 
 
 (1) The ' Deis ' or lands of inheritance (orba). 
 
 (2) Office or ' mensal ' lands. 
 
 (3) ' Termon' lands — the possessions of the Church. 
 
 (4) Pasture lands. 
 
 (5) Arable lands. 
 
 1 Notice some remarks by tlie late supposed to be sacred even to an inno- 
 
 Sir H. Maine in Early Law and Gus- vating Brehon. 
 
 tovi on literary fosterage as exemplified ^ See Skene, Celt. Scot. Vol. iii. p. 
 
 in the laws of Menu, poems of Homer 148. It is the territory to which by 
 
 (taking Grote's theory) and the Brehon this time the word Tuath is properly 
 
 laws. The Senchus Mor, however, was applied. The tribe is now ' Ciniol.' 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 25 
 
 The first group, that is the lands of inheritance, stand upon 
 a new basis altogether foreign to the theory of the primal 
 tribal community, and are either (1) the private possessions of 
 the Ri, as distinguished from the mensal lands which he held 
 as the appanage of office, or (2) the private possessions of the 
 Aires (or rather Flaths) which were either (a) ancient allodial 
 lands\ or (/S) had become property in severalty by prescription, 
 or (7) had been amassed by the Flath in the same manner as 
 the Ri had gathered his more extensive possessions, or (S) had 
 been granted as the reward of public service, or (e) had been 
 granted originally for life, and not returned into the public 
 stock on the death of the usufructuary. 
 
 It is doubtful if these inheritance lands were governed by 
 any real rules of descent save that of possession by members of 
 one family as apart from the tribe ; and it is probable that they 
 devolved by that most potent of all titles in troublous times, 
 the right of might. On the death of the Flath, therefore, the 
 most powerful member of his family would succeed to the lands ; 
 while the ingrained notion of common ownership would be still 
 so fixed in the other members that they would hold themselves 
 in theory, if not in fact, joint possessors with him ; and submit- 
 ting by force of circumstances to his nominal succession, w^ould 
 gain a very practical share of the inheritance by quartering 
 themselves upon him, and looking to him for support. 
 
 Considerable stress may indeed be laid on this view of the 
 family rights in inheritance lands, despite the fact that in the 
 book of Aicill the rights of the Duthaig fine, that is, the 
 group of the seventeen nearest kinsmen (divided into their 
 four groups of Geilfine, Deirbhfine, larfine, and Indfine'^) to 
 succeed to the Dibad, or inheritance land of the chief, are 
 fully expressed, and their reciprocal rights elaborately defined. 
 The whole arrangement of the Duthaig fine, though held by 
 
 1 It is certainly doubtful if the word received stock from the chief), and the 
 
 allodial should be used, both on ac- receipt of the Taurcrech by the Ceile, 
 
 count of the theoretical reversion of the these appearing to acknowledge some 
 
 tribe and also on account of the pay- dominion by the chief. Compare Sul- 
 
 ment of Bestigi by the Ceile to the livan, p. cxliii. 
 
 chief (for even the Flath seems to have ^ a. L. of I. Vol. i. p. 261. 
 
26 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 the late Sir Henry Maine to show signs of being developed 
 from accustomed rules of family relationship \ is strikingly arti- 
 ficial, and appears to be rather a learned Brehon's elaboration 
 of what the rights of family succession should be, than of being 
 a workable system of succession, more especially in troublous 
 times and among a semi-barbarous community. Mr Skene 
 calls attention also to the passage with which these rules end, 
 "and the whole number of the seventeen men are then forth- 
 coming, and if they be not, there shall be no partition but the 
 nearest of kin shall take^:" if the next of kin happened to be 
 powerful, judging from the record of bloodshed with which 
 Irish history abounds, he would have been likely to take very 
 practical measures to prevent the symmetrical Duthaig fine 
 from interfering with his title to the inheritance^. 
 
 Dealing with these lands of inheritance there is no more 
 striking illustration of the unsettled state of the country than 
 the apparent absence of even the germ of customary tenures. 
 No sooner has the chief become possessed of private lands, 
 and allowed the settlement upon them of servile dependents, 
 than the gradual establishment of some base tenure similar to 
 that of English copyhold might have been expected ; but while 
 the existence of this servile class is one of the most prominent 
 features of the early Irish society, there is no trace of any 
 definite rights being gained by them: on the contrary, the 
 large number of social outcasts, devoid of tribal rights, appears 
 merely to have encouraged the growth of unlimited exactions 
 by the chief 
 
 The extent of the lands of inheritance would tend largely 
 to increase as time went on, for the chief would employ his 
 wealth in cattle in Saer and Daer stock loans to freemen 
 occupying the tribe-land, and it seems certain that the rent 
 payable in produce of stock and refections developed, at 
 least in many cases, into rent payable for the land*. If the 
 
 1 Being apparently founded on a or tribe of the red-handed, composed of 
 principle similar to the Eoman law those who had killed, or attempted to 
 method as to the emancipation of sons kill the senior members of the fine in 
 from the patria potestas. order to gain their property, is an illus- 
 
 2 Gelt. Scot. Vol. III. p. 178. tration of this. Sullivan, p. clxvi. 
 
 3 The existence too of the Dergfine, ^ ggg e. Hist, of Inst. p. 160. 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 27 
 
 Ceile fell into arrears in his produce payments, and the stock 
 originally advanced by the chief was either destroyed by disesuse 
 or carried off by raiders, the easiest mode for the chieftain to 
 recoup himself would be to appropriate the Ceile's allotment 
 of tribe-land as a portion of the demesne, and to reduce the 
 Ceile to the status of a villein cultivator: nor is the shadowy 
 right of reversion existent in the tribe likely to have afforded 
 any sufficient barrier to such action. 
 
 There are also significant signs that a process similar to 
 'commendation' was not unknown as an operant factor in ex- 
 tinguishing the original tribal freeman. One modern writer* 
 appears to carry the view of the growth of a territorial basis 
 of society so far as to hold that the original family ties are 
 completely merged in the land-bond; pointing out that "the 
 possession of Deis or inheritance land which gave its owner 
 the title of Aire, was also essential to his acquiring the privi- 
 leges of. the chief of a fine." Without being prepared to go 
 quite to this length, it is certain that at the period of latest 
 development of the Brehon Law the Ceile is found in a 
 position in many ways assimilated to that of tenancy; the 
 ' coyne, livery and cosherings ' to which he was liable bearing a 
 strong resemblance to the onerous incidents of feudal tenure. 
 It was doubtless the case nevertheless that the idea of tribal 
 possession was deeply ingrained in the Celtic race at the time 
 when Sir John Davies commuted the Irish tenures. However 
 far in reality the steady march of time had advanced that 
 feudalization of the land, which in Aryan races seems always 
 to have gone hand in hand with increase of population and 
 the growth of the power of the chief, the idea of landlord 
 and tenant was still strange to the Irish mind and its com- 
 pulsory imposition on an unwilling people was probably a 
 fatal mistake. 
 
 It is so evident that in the Ceile dependents of the chief 
 is to be traced the germ of the relation of landlord and tenant, 
 that an examination of the Brehon rules regulating the cattle 
 loans, which brought the free tribesman into a subordinate 
 position, is an essential preliminary to a right appreciation 
 1 See Skene's Celt. Scot. Vol in. p. 175. 
 
28 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 of the nature of the Irish land system for which the English 
 tenures were substituted. The two subtracts of the Senchus 
 Mor in which the rules of these loans are dealt with are termed 
 the Cain Sereath and the Cain Aigillne. From these it ap- 
 pears that the usual period of a Saer-stock tenancy was seven 
 years ; during this period the young of the cattle lent, the milk, 
 and the manure, were taken by the chief The tenant did 
 homage, rendered help in reaping the harvest and, if required, 
 in repairing or building the castle {dun) of the chief or following 
 his banner in war. There seems to have been no fixed rule as 
 to the amount or frequency of the services to be rendered, and 
 here as throughout the Brehon Laws there arises the appa- 
 rent difficulty of the want of a sufficient sanction, for no 
 penalty is specifically mentioned for the non-performance of 
 these services, save that a seeming diminution in the honour 
 price of the tenant took place on his default \ After the end 
 of the seven years the cattle became the property of the Ceile. 
 The chief appears to have always lent the stock without security, 
 and though no tribesman was compelled to take stock from 
 his immediate chief yet he had no power to refuse to do so 
 from the Ri or king^ 
 
 These stock tenancies were terminable at will by the return 
 of the loan. If the chief reclaimed his cattle before the end of 
 the agreed term and the Saer Ceile expressed willingness there- 
 upon to hold as a Daer- stock tenant he either did so (an extra 
 amount of cattle being granted him) or the chief was liable 
 to forfeit one-third of the original stock lent^ Daer-stock 
 tenure differed in many ways from the comparatively free 
 tenure of the Saer Ceile ; the tribesman so holding received 
 a larger amount of stock, and some security was required from 
 him by the chief The stock advanced was made up of two 
 portions, one being somewhat similar to that dealt with in 
 Saer tenancy, that is to say being proportionate to the reserved 
 rent in kind, and the other being estimated with regard to the 
 
 1 A. L. of I. Vol, III. Intro, p. xlix. apply to Daer-stock tenants, A. L. of 
 
 2 A passage in the Cain Aigillne I. Vol. ii. p. 223. 
 
 seems to show that this rule did not ^ Intro, to Vol. ii. A. L. of I. p. xlix. 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 29 
 
 honour price* of the tenant. The exact amount of the rent in 
 kind varied, and the Cain Aigillne is full of elaborate regula- 
 tions as to the amount of stock proportionate to particular 
 food-rents. One example will show the nature of these rules, 
 " the proportionate stock of a cow with its accompaniments is 
 thirty ' seds,' besides the returnable seds" (that is to say twenty- 
 four cows). Thus for such a loan of twenty-four cows the food- 
 rent would be one cow and accompaniments^. The severity of 
 the Daer-stock tenure, however, lay not in the food-rent, but in 
 the services exacted from the tenant and in such incidents of 
 the tenure as * refections.' Under this right of * refection ' the 
 Irish chieftain came with his followers and quartered himself 
 upon the unhappy Daer-stock holder, chief and retinue living 
 at his expense. This right was probably of ancient origin ^ 
 and is frequently alluded to in the Cain Aigillne, but from very 
 early times it seems to have led to grave abuses. It was the pre- 
 cursor of ' coyne, livery and cosherings,' forms of exaction which 
 are bitterly denounced by Spenser and which were some of the 
 chief causes of complaint on the part of the English settlers*. 
 
 There are many provisions in the rules of Daer-stock tenancy 
 tending to show that in some respects a sort of contractual 
 relation on fairly equal terms, and with reciprocal rights and 
 duties, was regarded as being created between the chief and 
 the tenant^ These points are of interest as the after fate 
 of the Daer-stock tenant was one of complete servitude, and 
 it is therefore important to notice that by the rules of the 
 Brehon Law he should have been in no small degree protected. 
 Thus, theoretically it was possible for the Daer Ceile, without 
 
 1 That is the price paid for injuring cess see a letter of Sir H. Sydney's to 
 him. Queen Elizabeth (Sydney Papers). 
 
 2 A. L. of I. Vol. II. p. 261. There is an allusion to coyne and 
 ^ The customary entertainments livery in Baron Finglas' Breviate of 
 
 given by the tenant to the chief are Ireland (quoted in Harris' Hibernica) 
 
 treated in the Corus Bescna under the which is a proof of the light in which 
 
 head of ' human feasts' — and in them these exactions were regarded, it states 
 
 originated many abuses afterwards that " they would destroy Hell if they 
 
 included under cess. A. L. of I. were used in the same." 
 
 Intro. Vol. III. p. xlviii. s gge preface A. L. of I. Vol. ii. 
 
 4 For an account of the exaction of p. lii. 
 
30 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 the consent of the chief, to terminate the relation between them 
 by returning double the stock and seds, and paying a double 
 food-rent for the year in which they were so returned; again, 
 if the chief determined the tenancy without due cause he had 
 to forego his right to one-third of the stock and returnable 
 seds, and to forfeit one year's food-rent ; while if the chief 
 insulted the tenant in withdrawing the stock the Daer holder 
 was allowed in addition to retain that portion representing his 
 honour price. Other rules provided for double food-rent be- 
 coming due if the tenant neglected his duties, while he was 
 excused payment in cases of poverty \ At the end of seven 
 years on the death of the chief the cattle became the property 
 of the tenant ; while if the tenant died within the term the 
 chief was able to claim a submission from his co-heirs. 
 
 Before leaving the subject of lands of inheritance it is im- 
 portant to notice that in the later periods of the Brehon Law 
 this separate property appears to have been distinctly recog- 
 nized, and the power of disposing of it not to have been in any 
 way fettered. The mode of disposal, however, presents both 
 curious and characteristic traits, for, unlike most archaic systems, 
 the consensual relations of the contracting parties rather than 
 the formalities observed by them in carrying out the transfer, 
 are looked to as constituting the binding matter. The mode of 
 disposing of land, moreover, seems to have presented few differ- 
 ences from the informal transfers of personal property. The 
 traces of a basis of contract in the relations of early Irish 
 society to the land are of much interest ; not only as a great 
 contrast to most archaic theory, but also in view of the events 
 of modem history, when the application of a system of free 
 contract to Irish land was treated as the panacea for the accu- 
 mulated evils of centuries. 
 
 The ' Mensal ' lands descended by the custom of Tanistry as 
 the appanage of office, and here again the claims of power are 
 prominent. Despite the nominally elective nature of the chief- 
 
 1 See A. L. of I. Intro. Vol. ii. p. li. on the keen sense of wrong felt by the 
 
 and Hi. Bearing in mind the curious tenants in after times on capricious 
 
 vitality of old-established ideas these evictions and evictions for non-pay- 
 
 provisions possibly throw some light ment of rent when caused by poverty. 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 31 
 
 taincy (which even in its latest development was elective in the 
 individual though hereditary in the family) might constituted 
 the pre-eminent title. The king once chosen, the Tanaist 
 seems always to have been selected from that branch of the 
 family which came next in power : for example, as pointed out 
 by Mr Skene "the sovereignty over the whole of Ireland fell 
 for several centuries into one branch of the great family called 
 the Northern Hy Neill and the throne was filled alternately from 
 two branches of it\" The mode of succession by Tanistry was 
 not a feature peculiar to the Irish tribe, for customs analogous to 
 it are to be traced in many other races. A prominent example of 
 this is pointed out by Mr Justice Field ^ in the mode of succession 
 to the Raj existing in many parts of India, where on the decease 
 of the Rajah the succession goes not to his son but to the eldest 
 male of the family. In this case also the same distinction is 
 drawn between lands which are the appanage of office and those 
 which are the private property of the Rajah ^. Mensal lands 
 were originally intended to supply the chief with the necessary 
 regal state, but the principle seems to have eventually been 
 extended, and lands were set apart for the support of the public 
 officers of the community such as the Bard, Brehon, Historian, 
 etc. In later times the revenue of the chiefs was far more 
 derived from the "cuttings, cosherings and other Irish exactions, 
 whereby they did spoil and impoverish the people at their 
 pleasure ^" than from the genuine products of their Mensal lands. 
 All the lands of whatever kind held by the Church are 
 grouped under the heading of Termon lands, so called, accord- 
 ing to Sir John Davies, " because they were ever free from all 
 impositions and cuttings of the temporal lords, and had the 
 privilege of sanctuary." The Brehon Law recognized the claim 
 of the Church to tithes, firstfruits, and firstlings, under which 
 last head a most curious development of tenure arose: the 
 firstborn son was claimed as a right by the Church, and though 
 he obtained his equal share of the family property he held it as 
 
 1 Gelt. Scot. Vol. III. p. 150. prevailing amongst the Scottish Celts. 
 
 2 Judge of the High Court in Bengal. ^ Sir John Davies' Discoverie of 
 
 3 Field p. 242 (note), and see also Ireland, p. 169. 
 Sir H. Maine as to similar customs 
 
32 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 a Saer-stock tenant from the Church. It is probable that this 
 right was not generally exacted, but it stands entirely alone as 
 an instance of clerical power, and it is perhaps a justifiable 
 theory that some of the Church lands were obtained as gifts 
 in consideration of not enforcing this demand. 
 
 The Church lands were in the first place probably granted 
 by the tribe from the common stock, and the Brehon Law recog- 
 nizes to a very remarkable extent the claims of 'the tribe of the 
 Saint' to support. The most important influence exerted by 
 the Church on the system of land holding is that it un- 
 doubtedly did much, from more or less selfish ends, to aid free 
 alienation of land. The Corns Bescna shows that in the case 
 of acquisitions the Church had made great inroads on the re- 
 strictions imposed on alienation by the tribal system ; and that 
 even in allotments a successful attack had been made on 
 the original inviolability of tribal possession, as far as regards 
 alienation to the Church. 
 
 There is a curious similarity between the structure of the 
 religious bodies and the primitive theory of the clan. The 
 subdivision of the religious organization shows the same aggre- 
 gate of septs, and the growth and development of each religious 
 body appears to have exactly resembled the progress of the 
 secular tribe. We find this assimilation to the general model 
 even in the fragments of the tribe, the very Fuidhir tenants, 
 and the servile groups generally, seeming instinctively to have 
 moulded themselves in the general form, so it is perhaps not 
 remarkable that the religious community was framed on the 
 same lines. The relation of the Church to the tenants of 
 ecclesiastical land is closely analogous to the dealings of the 
 chief with the tribesman to whom he supplied stock, and 
 the Saer Manaich and Daer Manaich holders are the exact 
 equivalent of the Saer and Daer stock holders of the temporal 
 community. It is far from unlikely that the extent to which 
 lands were granted to the Church, and the way in which the 
 original strictness of the tribal rules as to alienation were 
 relaxed in her favour, may be traced to the fact that the pos- 
 session of lands by a corporation, the existing members of which 
 were probably allied by blood to the secular tribe, seemed a 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 33 
 
 very different thing from permitting ready alienation of land to 
 all the members of the tribe, a course which might tend to pass 
 the lands into the keeping of a temporal enemy. The ingrained 
 theory of tribal ownership and the absence of any real concep- 
 tion of tenure in the way in which the word is now used, would 
 prevent those objections to Mortmain, which would at once 
 occur to those trained under the feudal system, from possessing 
 weight. The artificiality of construction shown in the similarity 
 of the terms and ideas used in the religious clan to those used 
 in the secular tribe must also have had the effect of strengthen- 
 ing the apparent unity of the two bodies, and so have lessened 
 the antagonism to alienation. It must, however, be borne in 
 mind that this analogy to tribal organization is not confined to 
 the structure of the early Irish Church, but is also to be traced 
 in many early forms of guilds and partnerships, associations 
 which are now considered as springing solely from contract ; 
 and it has been argued that barrenness of imagination and the 
 slow generation of ideas is responsible for the similarity, and is 
 a distinguishing characteristic of the archaic community\ 
 
 Passing from the Termon lands to those still held in common 
 by the secular tribe, under a more or less modified form of the 
 original tribal ownership, they fall naturally into two divisions: — 
 
 (1) The Common Pasturage, open to every free tribesman 
 for the use of his cattle. In this is to be traced the origin of 
 some of the common lands, which in later times afforded one of 
 the subjects of contention between the landlord class and the 
 peasant holders. Two theories of the origin of commons are 
 advanced, termed respectively the legal and the historical I 
 The former^ traces them to grants from the lord ; while accord- 
 ing to the latter" their origin is to be found in the decay of the 
 Mark or Teutonic village community of freemen cultivating 
 their lands in common. It is evident that neither of these 
 theories is completely applicable to the Irish land system. The 
 Celtic community of the Brehon Laws is found thoroughly 
 
 1 E. Hist, of Inst. p. 229 and 232. 3 For an ingenious advocacy of which 
 
 2 See an article by Mr Scrutton see Seebohm's English Village Gomrnu- 
 in Law Quarterly Review 1887, also riity. See also Blackstone, Vol. ii. p. 92. 
 Mr Scrutton's Yorke Prize Essay on * See Digby's History of Real Pro- 
 Commons and Common Fields. perty Law, 3rd ed. p. 155 et seq. 
 
 M. 3 
 
34 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 started on an agricultural structure of open fields, and common 
 tillage \ with the power of the chief greatly developed, but yet 
 not having attained the recognized position necessary to make 
 him ultimate reversionary owner of the lands, or the head of a 
 manorial community. For a land system in this archaic state 
 was suddenly substituted in the reign of James the First the 
 fully developed feudal system with all lands held by tenure 
 from the lord. Commons, therefore, which were at this time 
 recognized, were clearly not derived from any grant from the 
 lord, but existed either as the survival of the old rights of 
 common user by the members of the tribal community, or were 
 created by the English lawyers in the methodical plans on 
 which the various territorial settlements were based; while any 
 power exercised by the lord in such lands trenches on pre- 
 existing rights instead of extending them. This fact would not 
 have precluded the subsequent creation of commons by grant 
 had a recognized system of manorial colonies grown up. There 
 is no trace, however, of this development : the lowest tenants 
 remained fixed in a state of servile dependency ; and the origin 
 of the common lands (the enclosure of which was in later times 
 so bitterly resented by the Irish peasantry as to give rise to the 
 forcible resistance of the ' Levellers ') may therefore be ascribed 
 partially to the portions of land in common ownership which 
 were retained by the English lawyers as commons after the 
 destruction of the tribal system, and which were regulated and 
 limited by such statutes as 16 Car. I.^ but rarely extended; and 
 partially to rights of user acquired in the lands which at the 
 time of the English settlements were left as unappropriated 
 wasted 
 
 (2) The Arable Lands, or common tillage, which were held 
 in more or less permanent allotments by the members of the 
 tribe, the allottee being merely entitled to the usufruct. To the 
 allotment of such lands the possession of cattle was generally, 
 if not always, a condition precedent ; as also to the right to 
 
 1 There are passages in the Brehon ^ These rights in their inception 
 Law showing the existence of common probably resembling common pur cause 
 ploughing. de vicinage. 
 
 2 c. 33. 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 35 
 
 possess a habitation in the township. It was to these lands, and 
 to the Gavelkind rules which regulated the succession to them, 
 that the attention of the English lawyers of the reign of James 
 the First was most directed. 
 
 If the statements of the Brehon Law, which point strongly 
 to the existence of individual property, are compared with the 
 statements of Sir John Davies, who seems to have considered 
 separate property (with the exception of the chiefs demesnes) 
 as non-existent, the difference between the two views of the 
 same system is certainly remarkable. The truth lies proba- 
 bly somewhere between the two, and the manner in which Sir 
 John Davies regarded the holdings can be accounted for by 
 the fact that his attention was doubtless most attracted by the 
 portion of the system most foreign to English notions ; nor is 
 there any doubt that the rules of Gavelkind did apply to by far 
 the largest portion of the Irish lands. According to these 
 rules, as has been said, on the death of one of the sept his lands 
 returned again into the common stock, and the " Canfinny " 
 made a redistribution. In this distribution bastards were in- 
 cluded, but no woman was entitled to a share. The arguments 
 against the Irish system of Gavelkind, on the strength of which 
 by a decision of all the judges the custom was abolished, will 
 be treated of later under the celebrated "Case of Gavelkind": 
 it is only necessary here to point out that far from being 
 radically different from the Kentish custom it was in reality 
 merely a more archaic form of the same usage, and that under 
 it an undoubted right to the soil was vested in each member 
 of the sept. An example of such a sept is quoted by Mr 
 Seebohm from the State Papers of James the First ; it con- 
 sisted of " 124 persons nearly all bearing the surname of Grame. 
 They were divided into families, 17 of which were set down as 
 possessed of £20 and upwards, 4 of £10 and upwards, 6 of the 
 poorer sort, 6 of no abilities, while as dependents there were 
 4 servants of the name of Grame, and about a dozen irregular 
 hangers on\" 
 
 Allusion has been made to the heavy exactions by the chief 
 recognized under the Brehon Law, and much of the abuse of the 
 '■ English Villaye Community, p. 219. 
 
 3—2 
 
36 THE BREHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 English critics of the Brehon system, headed by Spenser \ is 
 levelled at them. Such exactions as the " eric " composition for 
 murder, which is perhaps the one which both most attracted and 
 biased the criticisms of the English writers, are not within the 
 scope of this enquiry; but there were certain customs mainly in 
 the nature of the exactions of food supply by the chief and his 
 followers, which demand particular notice. These customs 
 were perhaps neither very unnatural nor very serious in their 
 inception, but they increased to an alarming extent as cen- 
 tury after century of war rolled by, and the English colonists 
 both adopted them as a ready means of exacting spoil from 
 their dependents, and also it would seem increased their severity. 
 Under the early tribal system, where the chief was regarded as 
 the father of the community, these payments probably repre- 
 sented no great hardship, being exacted in a very intermittent 
 manner and with some show of consideration ; but in the hands 
 of the degenerate English and the debased race of warlike 
 adventurers, who in later times represented the Irish chief- 
 taincy, they became terrible engines of oppression, and were 
 adopted as a means of raising money even within the Colony 
 of the Pale. The growth of these exactions has usually been 
 ascribed to the abuse of power by the Norman settlers who, 
 even when they had degenerated into tribal chieftains, were 
 deemed to have been out of sympathy with the class ruled. 
 An explanation which was offered by Dr Sullivan and adopted 
 by the late Sir H. Maine is more probable, namely, that it was 
 owing to the great increase of the Fuidhir tenants (a natural 
 result of warlike times) who were in a state of servile depend- 
 ence, and to whose outcast condition no tribal immunities 
 attached. 
 
 These exactions are met with in many forms and under 
 
 1 There is a marked bitterness of was embittered by the failure of his 
 
 tone in Spenser's View of the State of venture. A striking proof of the up- 
 
 Ireland, though it bears every trace of heavals of society undergone on the 
 
 being in the main a truthful state- resettlements of Irish land is found in 
 
 ment. He was himself a colonist the fact that a descendant of Spenser 
 
 (receiving an allotment of some 3,000 was ejected from this allotment under 
 
 acres on the plantation of the Desmond the Cromwellian settlement, 
 estates) and it is not unlikely that he 
 
il] the brehon law. 37 
 
 various names, but they are all of a very similar character, 
 consisting of a levy of food, usually exacted in primitive 
 fashion by the chief and his followers quartering themselves 
 for a more or less lengthy period on the tenant. There 
 appears little doubt that their origin lay in the tribal obli- 
 gation to support the chief, but they certainly afterwards 
 developed into something closely resembling the incidents of 
 tenure, and were always regarded in this latter light by the 
 English settlers. In very early times Bonaght^ (that is, money, 
 food and entertainment for his soldiers, and forage for their 
 horses) was exacted by the chief at pleasure, and the later de- 
 velopment of the same custom is found in the coyne and livery* 
 alluded to in the Irish statutes as a " damnable custom," and 
 regarded with such fervent hatred by the English settlers*. 
 Ancient exactions of a similar nature to ' Bonaght ' were 
 ' Sorohen,' ' Kernetty,' * Gillycone,' ' Mosyorowne,' ' Gillen- 
 inny,' and the levy of ' South ' which we find constantly 
 alluded to in the History of the Colony of the Pale under the 
 name of ' cuttings '. ' Coshery,' an exaction of provisions and 
 lodgings for himself and his retinue levied by the chief, is met 
 with again and again until the reign of James the First; and 
 * Refection,' a similar custom (though in its original form con- 
 fined to a right of the lord to be entertained for one night), 
 expanded into a most heavy burden on the tenant*. 'Cess' was 
 the name given to an English exaction founded on the Irish 
 model, which appears to have been first established in the 
 reign of Edward the Second, and consisted of a tax of five marks 
 on every ploughland discretionally levied under the pretence of 
 prerogative by the chief governors of Ireland for the support of 
 themselves and the soldiers in garrison ^ 
 
 1 This was of two kinds, Bonaght •'' John Cottrell was put to death 
 Bur and Bonaght Beg, the former "because he had introduced and 
 being at the discretion of the lord, the practised many grievous, foreign and 
 latter according to agreement. Ware, intolerable laws." 
 
 Vol. II. p. 74. 4 Notice also a provision of drink 
 
 2 Maurice Fitz Thomas is stated to termed ' satellitum poturae,' the ex- 
 have been the first of the English to actions termed 'Cuddies' and *Shragh 
 impose this tax, doing so in the time and Mart.' Ware, Vol. ii. p. 74 and 75. 
 of Edward II. ^ Jq the reign of Elizabeth we find 
 
38 THE BKEHON LAW. [CHAP. 
 
 It would be impossible to overrate the evil effects of these 
 levies. They utterly prevented proper cultivation of the land, 
 as the tillers of the soil saw the fruits of their labour liable to 
 be snatched from them at any time. They diminished the 
 estimation of all honest industry, to so great an extent that fre- 
 quently the free members of the sept would not work, lest their 
 having done so should lower them in the opinion of the chief, 
 and cause them to be excluded from the partition of tribal lands 
 in Gavelkind. A further expansion of the same idea being seen 
 in the class of descendants of a chief, who, when prevented from 
 living by a system of wholesale plunder, would rather perish 
 miserably than stoop to what they deemed menial pursuits. 
 Special attention is drawn to these exactions from the fact that 
 they were the moral justification advanced for the complete 
 substitution of English tenures for the Brehon system. That, 
 as has been stated, they constituted a most crying evil is doubt- 
 less true, but perhaps it is often forgotten that the English law 
 which was substituted for them was neither a very enlightened 
 nor a very humane institution : for example, the eric fine is 
 certainly repugnant to notions of right, and is palpably open to 
 abuse in the hands of the wealthy and unscrupulous ^ but the 
 penal code substituted for it would nowadays be considered a 
 flagrant evil. It is almost certain also that there was a dis- 
 tinction between the free tenant and the fuidhir settled on the 
 waste as regards the liability to the exactions of food levies, 
 and that the rights of the former have often been .confused 
 with the servile liabilities of the latter. 
 
 When dealing with the substitution of the English for the 
 Brehon Law one is struck with the entire variance which the 
 two systems seem to represent, and it is hard to realize that 
 they are in reality merely different stages of development of 
 kindred institutions, and that " the germs of feudalism lay deep 
 in the more ancient Irish social structure." The Brehon Laws 
 certainly show^ a system to which the notion of feudal owner- 
 ship is completely foreign ; but, as has been shown, these primi- 
 tive tribal conceptions had been greatly modified, and the pre- 
 
 a protest against the increase of this ^ E. Hist, of Inst. p. 170. 
 
 tax. See Ware, Vol. ii. p. 77. 
 
II.] THE BREHON LAW. 39 
 
 eminent power of the chief would seem to have been in some 
 respects a greater evil than the summary feudalization of the 
 land. Spenser, whose account, if prejudiced, is yet seldom 
 really inaccurate, states that the chiefs ''use most shamefully 
 to racke their tenants, laying upon them coin and livery at 
 pleasure, and exacting of them besides their covenants what he 
 pleaseth\" and Sir John Davies stated that " the lord was an 
 absolute tyrant and the tenant a very slave*." 
 
 1 Spenser, p. 57. ^ Sir J. Davies' Discoverie, p. 179. 
 
CHAPTER III 
 The Colony of the Pale 
 
 (from Henry II. to Henry VH.). 
 
 The influence of the more advanced civilization of foreign 
 nations was little felt by the early Irish laws and institutions; 
 and the various predatory incursions, which in early times 
 ravaged the coasts of Ireland, left no permanent mark on the 
 tribal system of land-holding, the Norse land system indeed 
 differing but little from the Irish. From the time of Henry 
 the Second of England, however, a new feature was introduced 
 by the appearance of feudal tenures. It is true that though 
 nominally spread all over the country it was only — until the 
 time of Elizabeth — within a comparatively limited area that 
 these tenures for any length of time held sway ; still from the 
 latter part of the twelfth century, some portion of the land of 
 Ireland was always so held. The two systems of land-holding, 
 Brehon and feudal, existed side by side; but save where the 
 latter had been imposed by force of arms, it gained no converts 
 from the native race, and failed to alter their ideas of the 
 relation of the occupier to the land. On the other hand the 
 Brehon Law secured many adherents from among the English 
 invaders. The causes of this were various. As Mr Froude 
 observes, " the Irish Celts possess on their own soil a power 
 greater than any known family of mankind of assimilating 
 those who venture among them to their own image \" and the 
 intermarriages of the English settlers'* with the native popu- 
 
 1 The English in Ireland, VoL i. p. daughter of Dermot Mac Murrough, 
 21. and his followers also largely con- 
 
 * Strongbow married Eva, the tracted Irish marriages. 
 
CHAP. III.] THE COLONY OF THE PALE. 41 
 
 lation created a class of Anglo-Irish who, bom in the country 
 and imbued with the native ideas, were galled by the re- 
 strictions of the feudal tenures by which their lands were 
 held*. The customs of Gavelkind and Tanistry also attracted 
 the younger sons and bastards, whom the strict rules of feudal 
 descent excluded from a share in the inheritance'"^. In result, 
 until the time of James the First, save in the Colony of the 
 Pale^, the feudal tenures did not hold, and in no way modified 
 the Brehon rules which were observed in the rest of Ireland. 
 
 It was pointed out by the late Sir Henry Maine'' that to 
 the existence of the English Colony, we are indebted for much 
 of the archaic nature of the Brehon Law being preserved to 
 so late a date in history as it was. The Colony " acting as a 
 running sore" prevented the internal disturbances of Ireland 
 from self-adjustment by the natural process of the merger of 
 all lesser states in one great master kingdom. Had such 
 arisen it would have established a centralized government, 
 and thus by endowing the Brehon Code with the force of more 
 certain judicial sanctions would have greatly modified the 
 loosely administered and in many cases conflicting laws, and 
 even in the end have changed the theory of land-holding by 
 the simple process of development. 
 
 The English invasion of Ireland took place towards the 
 latter part of the reign of Henry the Second (though it is 
 evident by the Bull obtained from Adrian the Fourth in 1155^ 
 
 1 There is ample proof that they a double ditch, six feet high *on the 
 regarded with even more dislike than side which meared next to the Irish- 
 did the native Irish, the aids, reliefs, man' (see Field, p. 249). In the earlier 
 &c. of the feudal tenures. periods of English rule the district 
 
 2 Primogeniture, however, though occupied by the English was termed 
 by this time fairly established as a * the land of Ireland.' 
 characteristic of the feudal system, was ^ E. Hist, of Inst., pp. 54 and 55. 
 not a feature of the early feud, which ^ This Bull reserved a payment of 
 descended to all the sons equally, while Peter's pence to Kome, and was in 
 from Glanville we know that as late as fact a bold attempt to make Ireland 
 Henry II. land held in socage frequently a spiritual fee — it was confirmed by 
 descended to all the sons equally. Alexander III. The Papal claim of 
 
 3 The term * Colony of the Pale ' right to make this grant was based on 
 arose from the provision of Poyning's the forged donation of Constantine, 
 law (1494) which enjoined on the which gave all islands to the see of 
 English colony the maintenance of Kome. 
 
42 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 that Henry had early* meditated a descent upon that country) 
 when, urged by the tempting bribes offered by Dermot Mac 
 Murrough to those who would assist him to recover the 
 kingship of Leinster, an expedition of Norman and Welsh 
 adventurers landed in Ireland in May, 1169^ The command 
 of this expedition was ultimately assumed by Richard de Clare, 
 Earl of Pembroke, better known as Strongbow, who landed 
 near Waterford with some 1200 men and 200 knights on the 
 eve of St Bartholomew, 1170. Besides many small tribes 
 there were at this time five principal sovereignties in Ireland, 
 Munster, Leinster, Meath, Ulster, and Connaught, the leader 
 of the most powerful of these being termed monarch of Ireland, 
 and holding Meath as an appanage of office. This post was 
 then occupied by Roderic O'Connor, king of Connaught, 
 against whom the efforts of the English expedition were 
 directed. Strongbow was successful in gaining the more or 
 less complete possession of Dublin, Meath, Leinster, and Water- 
 ford as far as Dungarvan; but the expedition, which at first 
 had the countenance of the English king, ere long incurred 
 his displeasure. Strongbow, finding his supplies from England 
 cut off, and his precarious position in Ireland rendered practi- 
 cally untenable, offered to Henry the lands he had won^. 
 After some delay, and after an interview had taken place at 
 Gloucester between the Earl and the King, Henry accepted 
 the surrender of Dublin and all other ports and fortresses 
 then (or to be) conquered in Ireland, and granted to the Earl 
 
 1 Henry is sometimes thought to with the following letter, "My sove- 
 have originally intended Ireland for reign lord, I came into this land, and 
 his brother William, for whom no (if I remember aright) with your per- 
 pro vision had been made by their late mission, for the purpose of restoring 
 father (see Moore's Hist, of Ireland, your liegeman Dermot Mac Murrough, 
 Vol. II. p. 205). William the Con- and whatsoever the favour of fortune 
 queror had planned the conquest of has bestowed upon me, whether from 
 Ireland, William Eufus had had simi- his patrimony or from any other 
 lar designs. See Pearson, p. 520 quot- source, as to your generous munifi- 
 ing A. S. Chron. and Girald. Camb. cence I owe it all, so shall it all return 
 
 2 This date is sometimes given as to you, and be placed at the disposal 
 1170. of your absolute will and pleasure. 
 
 '^ Strongbow first despatched Kay- See Moore, Vol. ii. p. 235. 
 mond Le Gros to Henry in Normandy 
 
III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 43 
 
 and his heirs for ever all his other acquisitions, to be held 
 as fiefs of the English crown. From this period dates the 
 authority of the English monarchs over Ireland, and the exist- 
 ence of the feudal tenures in that country. 
 
 In October 1171 \ Henry himself landed in Ireland with 
 500 knights and about 4000 men ; the chief event of his stay 
 of importance as affecting the land law of Ireland being the 
 holding of a Curia Regis at Lismore'^ at which Council it is 
 stated that the laws of England were accepted under oath by 
 those present ^ It is probably incorrect, however, to imagine 
 that the English law was ever intended to apply to the mass 
 of native Irish ; for at the Synod of Cashel the Irish clergy 
 were specially exempted from the payment of the eric fine*, 
 and from coyne and coshering — provisions which would be 
 meaningless unless such incidents of the Irish land system 
 had been contemplated as remaining in force amongst the 
 native race^ In support of this view it is noticeable that 
 when a confirmatory grant of the laws and customs of England 
 was given by John, and again by Henry the Third, it was 
 confined to such of the Irish as became liege subjects; also 
 there are large numbers of Royal grants of naturalization made 
 upon petition to the offspring of Anglo-Irish marriages, giving 
 them the benefit of the English laws and franchises I Henry's 
 
 ^ This date is often stated to be Oct. is made among the lay people, for any 
 
 1172, but see Dr O'Connor's criticisms murther, that no person of the clergy 
 
 on Leland, Rer. Hib. scrip., torn. ii. (though he be kin to any of the parties) 
 
 cxv.; see also Lord Lyttelton's Life of shall contribute anything thereto, but 
 
 Henry II. , Field, p. 244. Girald. Camb. as they be guiltless from the murther, 
 
 gives date as 1172. so shall they be free from payment of 
 
 2 Whatever laws were enacted at this mony, for any such earick or release 
 time are lost, but we find an allusion for the same." See Cox's History of 
 to one of the statutes passed by Henry Ireland, p. 23, and Giraldus Cambreu- 
 in 2 Rich. III. c. 8. sis. Rolls Series, Vol. v. ch. 35, p. 
 
 3 "Sed rex pater, antequam ab Hy- 281. 
 
 hernia rediret, apud Lissemor conci- ^ Thomas Moore's History of Ire- 
 
 lium congregavit, ubi leges Angliae ab land, Vol. ii. pp. 258, 259. 
 
 omnibus sunt gratanter acceptae, et, ^ See Warner's History of Ireland, 
 
 juratoria cautione praestita confirma- p. 93, and Moore, Vol. ii. p. 332 (note), 
 
 tae." Matth. Paris. " Historia An- says, "among the records of the Irish 
 
 glorum." Rolls Series, Vol.i. p. 371. Rolls office are many of these licenses 
 
 •* "That when earick or composition granted to particular Irish to use the 
 
44 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 object was not so much to regulate the customs and manner 
 of the minor and native Irish holdings, as to obtain a public 
 ratification of his feudal lordship from the English settler 
 barons, and from the more important Irish chieftains. Never- 
 theless all the laws enacted by him when in Ireland followed 
 the feudal polity, and the estates he granted were in con- 
 sideration of homage, fealty, and military or honorary service; 
 the grantees under tenures then created being tenants in 
 capite, examples being the tenure on which Strongbow re- 
 ceived the principality of Leinster, and Hugh de Lacy the 
 seigniory of Meath\ 
 
 It should be remembered that the English feudal system of 
 this date was a more complete engine of monarchical power than 
 continental feudalism, which possessed a weak point in the 
 absence of immediate relation between the tenant of a mesne 
 lord and the feudal sovereign. William, on the conquest of 
 England, utilized the existence of the 'trinoda necessitas' as 
 a lever for remedying this blot^ and by the time of Henry the 
 Second the doctrine that where land was held of a mesne lord, 
 the service was due to the king, was firmly established; the 
 form of homage adopted after the Conquest to create the feudal 
 tie between a mesne lord and his tenant always containing a 
 saving of the allegiance due to the king. The system in 
 Ireland was, however, in many cases different ^ The large 
 
 English laws, some of them being Irish crown, and by this grant Hugh de 
 
 women whose husbands were English." Lacy obtained about 800,000 acres, 
 
 Attention is also called to the careful held by the tenure of fifty knights' 
 
 exclusion of the native Irish as a mass service. The Baronial Courts held 
 
 from English privileges. A grant is within this area eventually became so 
 
 quoted of English privileges to two powerful that they were suppressed as 
 
 Irishmen, given in the Close Koll 37 interfering with the rights of the crown, 
 
 Henry III., where the writ especially see Moore's History of Ireland. This 
 
 states that this favour was granted large grant was evidently made with 
 
 them "notwithstanding that they were a view to counterbalancing the power 
 
 Irish," Vol. III. p. 22. Notice also two of Strongbow. 
 
 records, viz. 2 Ed. III. Claus. Membr. ^ Notice the oath at Sarum, a.d. 
 
 17, and 28 Ed. III. quoted in the 1086. 
 
 ' Case of Tanistry.' Davies' Keports, ^ For example in the cases of Strong- 
 
 p. 103. bow and de Lacy, and later in the 
 
 1 Meath, as the former appanage of cases of the Butlers and Geraldines. 
 Irish Koyalty, had passed to the English 
 
III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 45 
 
 grants which Henry made were grants which carried also the 
 privileges of a county Palatine \ and gave to the grantee the 
 right of civil and criminal jurisdiction independent of the 
 crown '^ The lord of such a fee could enfeoff tenants to hold of 
 himself, escheats for treason accrued to him instead of to the 
 crown, and the king's process ranged only in the church lands I 
 
 Henry did not assume the title of king of Ireland, but 
 seems to have been satisfied with being acknowledged a sort of 
 * paramount power".' It has been asserted, and is not unlikely, 
 that much of the readiness with which the Irish chieftains sub- 
 mitted to him was due to the fact that they merely understood 
 the feudal bond as binding them to a general support of the 
 king by military service, and were in complete ignorance of the 
 change in the title to their lands which the subtle and intricate 
 system of the Norman lawyers deduced from the apparently 
 simple ceremony of homage and fealty. Mr Pearson says 
 " From the English point of view, the kings of England were 
 henceforth lords-paramount of Ireland, with the fee of the soil 
 vested in them, and all Irish princes in future were no more 
 than tenants-in-chief From the Irish point of view, the Eng- 
 lish kings were nothing more than military suzerains in the 
 districts outside the Pale''." 
 
 Roderic O'Connor, though crippled in power by the con- 
 quests of Strongbow and reduced to treat for peace, was still 
 far from conquered at the time when the English king visited 
 Ireland, and it is probable that steps would have been taken to 
 reduce him to subjection had not the investigation then pending 
 into the death of Becket forced Henry to return home in April 
 11 72^ Ireland was then, in name at least, completely conquered, 
 
 1 In the proceedings of the Irish enter all franchises for the apprehen- 
 Parliament in 1467 among the un- sion of felons or traitors. 
 
 printed statutes is one enacting that ^ It is noticeable that even the 
 
 the Palatine liberty of Meath, despite Leinster provinces of Strongbow, 
 
 its merger in the crown by inherit- though acquired in right of his wife, 
 
 ance, should continue. were surrendered and reconveyed in 
 
 2 Hallam's Const. Hist., Vol. iii. feudal form. 
 
 chapter 18, p. 347. ^ jjig^^ ^y ^j^g^ during Early and 
 
 ^ But by the statute of Kilkenny Middle Ages, Vol. i. p. 531. 
 the king's sheriffs were entitled to t^ Whence it is said he sent a 'modus 
 
46 tHE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 Ulster alone being admittedly unsubdued. In 1175 a treaty 
 was concluded at Windsor between Henry and the emissaries of 
 Roderic, by which Roderic, in consideration of having done 
 homage and undertaking an annual tribute for himself and the 
 Irish at large of one merchantable hide for every tenth head of 
 cattle killed in Ireland outside the English provinces, was to 
 hold his lands peaceably, as a king under Henry, and to have 
 dominion over all Ireland save the then English possessions of 
 Dublin, Meath, Leinster and Waterford\ provided he remained 
 faithful and preserved his covenants ^ If Roderic regarded this 
 treaty but lightly the English king also seems not to have felt 
 in the least fettered by it, and it is probable that he had from 
 the first only regarded it as another means of asserting his 
 paramount suzerainty over the whole of Ireland : for despite its 
 provisions "all Ireland was by Henry the Second cantonized 
 amongst ten of the English nation, and though they did not gain 
 possession of one-third of the kingdom, yet in title they were 
 owners and lords of all, as nothing was left to be granted to the 
 natives ^" 
 
 The policy of Henry is evident; he intended that the feudal 
 grantees should subdue this turbulent kingdom, and in serving 
 their own ends establish also the dominion of the English kings 
 over the whole of Ireland. One cannot but wonder that the 
 far-sighted scheme was not fulfilled in history. That the de- 
 scendants of the chivalry, which only a hundred years before 
 
 tenendi Parliamenta ' to Ireland, but ei tributum : totam illam terrain .. 
 
 the authority and antiquity of this habitatores terrae habeat sub se ; .. 
 
 document cannot be maintained despite Justitiae ut tributum Kegi Angliae 
 
 the championship of it by Sir Edward integre persolvant, per manum ejus 
 
 Coke. sua jura sibi conservent, .. illi qui 
 
 1 Waterford that is to say as far as modo tenent, teneant in pace, quamdiu 
 Dungarvan. manserint in fidelitate Eegis AngHae, 
 
 2 Quod Kex Angliae concedit prae- .. fideliter .. integre persolverint tribu- 
 dicto Roderico, Ligeo homini suo tum, .. alia jura sua quae ei debent, 
 Kegnum Conaciae, quamdiu ei fideliter per manum Regis Conaciae, salvo in 
 serviet, ut sit Rex sub eo, paratus ad omnibus jure .. honore Domini Regis 
 servitium suum, sicut homo suus .. ut Angliae .. suo, etc. etc. — Cox's Hist. 
 teneat terram suam ita bene, .. in pace, of I. page 29. 
 
 sicut tenuit, antequam Dominus Rex ^ Sir John Davies' Discoverie, p. 
 
 Angliae intravit Hiberniam reddendo 137,— and see Field, p. 244, 245. 
 
III.] FROM HENRY IT. TO HENRY VII. 47 
 
 rode rough-shod over Saxon England, and a century and a half 
 before that wrested Normandy from "Frank Noblesse and 
 Romanesque provincials," carving so goodly a heritage with the 
 sword, should have failed for centuries to subdue an uncivilized 
 people, is in many ways remarkable. The Irish, despite their 
 valour, were most contemptible adversaries to Norman disci- 
 pline, and that civilization should have failed to follow the 
 victorious banner is a curious problem. Stranger still is it to 
 find that as time went on not only did the English power in 
 Ireland wane, and the limits of the Colony of the Pale become 
 more and more contracted, but also that the glamour of the 
 Celt was over all the land; that proud de Burgh and courtly 
 Geraldine had become mere tribal chieftains^; that the Butlers 
 ruled but as half civilized petty kings; and that the descendants 
 of the frugal, scholarly, priest-army of the Conqueror William 
 had sunk to lives of debauchery and rapine. The children of a 
 race who had written their laws in blood on the English statute 
 book threw oft' the shackles of the system their ancestors had so 
 laboriously welded, and assimilated themselves to the social 
 condition and primitive land system of the Brehon Law to such 
 an extent that the law of England was never " properly applied 
 unto the Irish nation as of a purposed plot of government^" 
 until James the First. 
 
 In May 1177 Henry (having obtained a permissive Bull 
 from Pope Alexander the Third) in Council at Oxford con- 
 stituted John, a child of eleven, king of Ireland^ ; the Legate 
 Vivianus having shortly before this held a Synod at Dublin in 
 which he published the king's title. The Prince, however, is 
 always termed merely Lord of Ireland and Earl of Moreton. The 
 
 1 Land System of Ireland^ O'Connor The matter was mooted before the 
 Morris, L. Q. R. 1887, p. 137. English judges in the decision on the 
 
 2 Spenser's View and perfect Bis- precedent of the Staple Act (2 Hen. 
 covery of Ireland, edition 1633, p. 10. VI.). Chief Justice Coke, Sir J. Davies 
 
 3 This donation of Ireland to John and Molyneux have all treated at 
 has given rise to many controversies length of the matter, and reference 
 (1) as to whether it created Ireland a should be made to Sir J. Davies' 
 separate kingdom from England, (2) speech in 1613 when Speaker of the 
 as to whether it prevented the laws of Irish House of Commons. See Moore, 
 England being binding on Ireland. Vol. ii. p. 329. 
 
48 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 feudal grants before made by Henry were confirmed with 
 alterations by new charters under which the lands were gene- 
 rally held from John instead of from the king\ These grants, 
 however, are very inconsistent, Henry's opinion of the wisdom 
 of the step he had taken in constituting John king of Ireland 
 seeming to vary from time to time. Frequently the appoint- 
 ment appears to have been altogether disregarded : there are 
 grants by Henry, subsequent to the Council at Oxford, in which 
 lands are granted to be held of himself alone and his heirs, 
 while others grant by tenure from him and John and their 
 heirs I Grants of fiefs not formerly existing were also made at 
 this time^ (many of which were never more than nominal, the 
 grantees failing to reduce them to subjection), and the policy of 
 Henry for the subjection of the land was followed by his grantees 
 who largely subinfeudated their possessions. 
 
 In 1185 John, then only nineteen years of age, landed at 
 Waterford with a considerable force. His stay, which might 
 have ended in the complete subjection of the Irish, was really 
 the commencement of that decay of the English power which 
 left the Colony of the Pale at the close of the fifteenth century 
 possessed of merely a strip of land round Dublin. The offence 
 given by the Prince and his followers to the Irish tributary 
 chiefs, the impolitic resumption of the royal demesnes, and 
 the unjust and shameful expedition of Philip of Worcester 
 into Ulster, sowed the seeds of wide-spread revolt and suc- 
 cessful retaliation; whilst the recall of John and the appoint- 
 ment of de Courcy as governor came too late to be availing. 
 The succession of Richard the First to the English crown did 
 not interfere with the nominal lordship or kingship of John 
 over Ireland, and for the next hundred years the history of 
 this unhappy country is a record of bloodshed and rapine. 
 The English settlers strove by force to gain possession of the 
 broad lands so glibly granted them, and "they built castles 
 and made freeholds but no tenures or services were reserved 
 to the crown"*;" while both the Irish chieftains and English 
 
 1 e.g. The new grant of Meath to ^ e.g. The grant of Limerick or 
 Hugh de Lacy. North Munster. 
 
 2 See Moore, Vol. ii. p. 330. 4 ggg Field, p. 245. 
 
III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 49 
 
 lords warred amongst themselves as well as against one 
 another. As still further extending the titular claims of the 
 English to the Irish soil a surrender should be noticed in 
 1205 by Cathal, son of Roderic, to John. This arrangement 
 finally abandoned the violated treaty of Windsor, delivered to 
 the English crown two-thirds of Connaught, and acknowledged 
 John's lordship over the remainder by the annual payment 
 of one hundred marks\ In 1210 John, this time in the 
 full dignity of King of England, but under the ban of ex- 
 communication, again visited Ireland, and received the homage 
 of many Irish princes and settler barons. To this date is 
 ascribed the division of the English provinces into shires and 
 counties; and it is also stated that an abstract of the laws 
 and customs of England was placed in the Exchequer at 
 Dublin. An allusion to this gift of the English laws is con- 
 tained in the writ of 11 Hen. III.^, but as has been before 
 stated neither of these grants seems to have had any real 
 application to the native Irish ^ The visit of John, as indeed 
 the whole of his reign, advanced but little the summary 
 feudalization of the main body of Ireland. Within the English 
 colony, however, the feudal system was fully followed, at any 
 rate in its most onerous incidents, for there are many writs of 
 this reign extant demanding 'consilium et auxilium*'. 
 
 The reign of Henry the Third of England produced also 
 but little benefit; the Irish Charter proved a worthless gift, 
 and was never intended to reach the case of the native race. 
 A variety of new grants in feudal form^ are noticeable, chief 
 among which is that of the whole of Connaught to Richard 
 
 ^ John was allowed, it would seem, by a landlord within the Pale seems 
 
 to choose his portions from the best to be under Stat. West. 2nd (13 
 
 of the province. See letter to Meiler Edw. I.) which gave a right to a writ 
 
 Fitz-Henry, quoted by Leland, Vol. i. of cessavit against the tenant for two 
 
 p. 175. years' default in the reserved services. 
 
 2 See Cox, p. 51, where the writ of See Sigerson, pp. 15, 16 (note). 
 Henry HI. is quoted. s Henry HI. made his son Edward 
 
 3 See ante, p. 43. 'lord of Ireland,' and a writ {Rot. 
 ^ See Moore. In the Incorporation Pat. 40 Hen. HI. m. 12) authorised the 
 
 Charter of Dublin given in 1192, bur- Prince's seal as the great seal of Ireland, 
 gage tenure is established. The first see Constitution of England and Ireland, 
 case of legal action against a tenant by Sir W. Betham, p. 254. 
 
 M. 4 
 
50 THE COLONY OF THE PALE .- [CHAP. 
 
 de Burgh, in utter defiance of John's re-grant to Cathal on his 
 surrender of that province which has been alluded to before \ 
 The conflicting titles'"^ to the Irish provinces at this time 
 were of themselves sufficient to stir up war, independent of 
 the national animosities involved ; and murder, massacre, and 
 treachery form the staple of the history of this period. In 
 1272, a century from the installation of the English power in 
 Ireland, a petition was presented to Edward the First asking 
 for the extension to the Irish of the laws and customs of 
 England. The petitioners were most likely the inhabitants 
 of the districts adjoining the Colony, and the memorial does 
 not seem to have been considered until 1280, or to have led 
 to any important result, but it is a significant proof of the 
 failure of English civilization to extend outside the limits of 
 the Pale I 
 
 Maddened by oppression and outrage^ the native race 
 sought in 1315 the assistance of Bruce to destroy the English 
 dominion, but upon the failure of his expedition they merely 
 found themselves in worse case than before, and fresh exactions 
 and severities were heaped upon 'the mere Irish.' Slowly 
 but surely, however, the Celtic race had been absorbing to 
 
 ^ See ante, p. 49. " until the terra rolls, from the portly 
 
 2 As late as 1220 the Pope in send- size of from 60 to 90 membranes, for 
 
 ing letters to Connaught, Ulster and the proceedings of each, are shrunk 
 
 Munster, addressed the kings of Con- to four." Constitution of England and 
 
 naught, Cork, Limerick and Ulster. Ireland, p. 350. 
 
 See Church History of Ireland, S. Ma- ^ How really great were the wrongs 
 lone. of the Irish people is shown by the 
 '^ Attention was called by Sir W. statement of their case forwarded to 
 Betham to the fact that the size of the Pope about this time, by O'Neil, 
 the Placita Kolls of the Courts are an prince of Tyrone, which appears to be 
 indication by which the extent of no exaggerated catalogue of injustice 
 English law and power at different and crime; and by the record cited by 
 times may be judged. During the Sir John Davies {Discoverie, p. 109), 
 reigns of Henry III. and Edward I., 4 Edw. II. where a murderer's defence 
 Edward II. and Edward III. they are reads "bene cognovit quod prsedictum 
 large and well-written, " pleas and as- Johannem interfecit ; dicit tamen quod 
 sizes were held by the justices itinerant per ejus interjectionem feloniam com- 
 in most parts of Ireland, and the plead- mittere non noluit, quia dicet quod 
 ings exhibit an exact sequence and all praedictus Johannes fuit purus Hi- 
 regularity of form and precedent." bernicus." 
 After these reigns they steadily decrease 
 
III.] FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 51 
 
 itself and incorporating in its being the descendants of the 
 proud Norman settler barons. Severed from England and tied 
 to the land of their adoption, the subtle influence of the soil 
 and the alteration in the blood by admixture of race, had 
 their natural effect. The amalgamation was aided, moreover, 
 by the wild anarchy of the land, for in times when every man's 
 hand was against his brother, an English lord of an Irish fief 
 must have owed all his chances not only of supremacy but of 
 actual existence to the loyalty to his banner of his Irish de- 
 pendents; and while "to the Irish kern it mattered little 
 whether his chief was a Geraldine or an O'Connor; it mattered 
 much whether he was to be ruled under the imported laws 
 of the stranger or by the customs and traditions of his own 
 people.... The baron and his Irish retainers found the rela- 
 tions between them grow easy when the customs of the country 
 were allowed to standi" So, by a strange irony of fate, the 
 very men and means designed for the subjugation of the 
 native system endowed it with a stubborn vitality quite foreign 
 to its natural character. 
 
 The defection of the English-born subjects of the crown 
 was not tamely countenanced by either the home government or 
 the English Colony, and in 1341 the policy of the English king 
 was specially directed towards breaking the power and wealth 
 of these descendants of the first Anglo-Norman conquerors 
 of Ireland. The first step taken was "a general resumption 
 of all the lands, liberties, seigniories, and jurisdictions that had 
 been granted in Ireland not only by Edward the Third himself 
 but also by his father I" Next followed in 1342 the removal 
 of the Anglo-Irish from offices under the crown ^; and in 1355 
 came a series of ordinances forbidding intermarriages betwixt 
 English and Irish, and rendering illegal the practice of foster- 
 ing* which was largely carried on. 
 
 * English in Ireland, Fronde, Vol. i. the administration of justice in Ire- 
 
 p. 24. land. 
 
 2 Moore, Vol. iii. p. 95. 4 xhis practice of fostering was of 
 
 3 Close Roll, 15 Edw. III. In the great antiquity, and Dr Whitley 
 reign of Edw. III. also was passed an Stokes, in the Tripartite Life of St 
 " Ordinatio pro statu terrae Hiber- Patrick, Vol. i. p. clxix, says, " The 
 niae," 31 Edw. III. st. 4, to amend relations of fosterer and fosterling seem 
 
 4-^2 
 
52 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 Some doubt has been expressed as to the way in which 
 English statutes were made to apply to Ireland. It is cus- 
 tomary to find in the Irish enactments allusions to the English 
 statutes as though without any formality they were as a matter 
 of course part of the law of Ireland : it is most likely that they 
 were introduced by the simple process of sending them over 
 under the great seal, the methods of legislation being at this 
 date arbitrary in the extreme \ 
 
 Gradually but surely as time went on the power of the 
 Celtic customs made head against the English laws, and the 
 Anglo-Irish rulers became more and more synonymous with 
 the native race. At length in 1367 was passed the memorable 
 Act known as the Statute of Kilkenny, by which a determined 
 effort was made, on the part of those settlers and colonists who 
 were still loyal to the English rule, to stem the tide of Celtic 
 influence^. By this statute it was made treason for one of 
 English birth or blood to accept or rule by the Brehon Law ; 
 and to intermarry, or to permit the fosterage of children^ with 
 the Irish : whilst the penalty of forfeiture was attached to those 
 who adopted the names, tongue, or manners of the mere Irish. 
 The efforts of civilization to reclaim her errant children came, 
 however, too late, and from this time the legislation of the 
 English colony is occupied more in repeated and futile at- 
 tempts at the repression of the alien and degenerate English 
 
 in Ireland to have been of almost more se governent as Maniers, guise, et lang 
 
 importance than those of parent and des Irrois enemies, et auxaint ownt fait 
 
 child;" he mentions that there was divers mariages et aliaunces enter eux 
 
 frequently a plurality of fosterers, in- et les Irrois enemyes" (quoted by Si- 
 
 stancing Cormac, the son of Enda, gerson from "Tracts relating to Ire- 
 
 who had four, and the curious ques- land," Irish Archffiological Society), 
 
 tion addressed to St Patrick as to This statute was renewed by every 
 
 whether ' God's son had many foster Parliament until 1452. 
 
 fathers' (si filium ejus nutrierunt ^ xhe subject of fosterage as dealt 
 
 multi). with in the Brehon Law will be found 
 
 1 See Eeeve's History of the English in the 'Cain larrath,' one of the sub- 
 Law, Vol. II. p. 249, 250. tracts of the Senchus Mor. It presents 
 
 2 How strong this influence had a glimpse of the social life of the Irish 
 become is shown by the following ex- worthy of much attention, — for an 
 tract. "Et ore plusors Engleis de la able resume see the introduction to 
 dit terre guepissant la lang, gis, mon- the second volume of the Ancient Laios 
 ture, leys, usages. Engleis vivent et of Ireland. 
 
III. 
 
 FROM HENRY II. TO HENRY VII. 
 
 53 
 
 than in a struggle against the purely native race. When 
 Richard the Second in 1394 came over to Ireland, the force at 
 his command, it is true, for a time brought the lapsed chiefs 
 again to their allegiance, but the revival of English authority 
 was only temporary. The absenteeism of many of the loyal 
 lords prevented any possibility of the retention of power over 
 the Anglo-Irish chieftains, and the prohibition of absenteeism 
 under pain of forfeiture does not appear to have efficaciously 
 grappled with the difficulty. The circle of the English colony 
 grew steadily less, and in the reign of Henry the Fourth there 
 are significant proofs of the decreased power of the Pale and 
 the formidable encroachments upon it by the Irish, in the 
 licenses given to particular colonists to war with " the enemy," 
 In addition there are licenses to trade, and (despite the Statute 
 of Kilkenny) to intermarry and to enter into gossipred and 
 fosterage with the Irish, which are manifestly concessions to 
 the exigencies of circumstances^; a fact further shown by the 
 payment of ' black rent ' by the English authorities to buy off 
 the hostility of neighbouring chieftains. Towards the end of 
 this reign it was admitted in Parliament by the Speaker of the 
 English House of Commons that the greater part of Ireland 
 had been 'conquered' by the natives'^; and the conquests of 
 Henry the Fifth in France prevented a great military genius 
 from employing in the subjugation of what was nominally his 
 own kingdom, the army with which for a time France was ' re- 
 duced to an English province^.' 
 
 1 Instances of these licenses are 
 quoted by Moore, Vol. iii. pp. 148, 
 149:— 
 
 (1) Tomake war... "Rex, pro eo quod 
 maneria et possessiones Cornelii Epis- 
 copi in Lym. in frontura raarchiarum 
 inter Hibernicos inimicos et Anglicos 
 rebelles sita sunt, concessit ei, tenen- 
 tibus et serventibus suis quod ipsi cum 
 dictis Hibernicis, etc. tractare possent." 
 Pat. Roll 10 Hen. IV. 
 
 (2) For fosterage... "Rex, pro servicio, 
 licentiam dedit Willielmo filio Henric. 
 Betagh quod ipse Elizam filiam suam 
 cuidam Odoni Oraylly Hibernico dare 
 
 possit ad nutriendum." Pat. Roll 7 
 Hen. IV. 
 
 2 See Lingard's Hist, of Eng.^ Vol. 
 II. p. 320. 
 
 3 A military expedition round the 
 borders of the Pale was indeed carried 
 out with success during this reign by 
 Sir John Talbot, but it was productive 
 of no lasting effect and is mainly no- 
 ticeable from the fact that the ill-paid 
 soldiery levied 'coyne and livery' on 
 the inhabitants of the Colony ; a curi- 
 ous instance of the vitality of the Irish 
 customs. 
 
54 THE COLONY OF THE PALE, [CHAP. IIL 
 
 The inattention displayed by the conqueror of Agincourt to 
 the needs of Ireland was not caused by any want of energy 
 on the part of the English colony there in proclaiming their 
 grievances. In the Close Roll of 9 Henry V. is a most lengthy 
 petition^ for redress of their wrongs, which amongst other 
 points complains to the king that "his poor lieges are dis- 
 tressed, and his land, for the greater part, wasted and de- 
 stroyed by the Irish enemies and English rebels, as well by 
 their continual wars on his said lieges in each country of his 
 said land, as by divers extortions, oppressions, non-payments 
 
 and evil coignes by divers lieutenants and by default of 
 
 due execution of his laws." Henry the Fifth, however, was 
 totally engrossed by continental conquest, and no heed seems 
 to have been paid to the representations from Ireland. On 
 his death the guardians of Henry the Sixth had more im- 
 portant matters to deal with at home, and the result of this 
 neglect was soon apparent. About this time it was stated "yr 
 is not left in the nethir parties of the counties of Dyvelin 
 (Dublin), Mith (Meath), Loueth and Kildare, that yoynin to 
 gadyr, oute of the subjection of the saide enemyes and rebels 
 scarisly xxx miles in lengthe, and xx in brede ther, as a 
 man may surely ride other go, to answerre to the Kynge's 
 writtesl" 
 
 1 Quoted in full by Sir W. Betham, sent to Hen. VI. which are in the 
 
 The Constitution of England and Ire- Close KoU 7 Hen. VI. and 14 Hen. VI. 
 
 land, pp. 335 — 350. respectively, both are quoted by Be- 
 
 ^ Sigerson, p. 21 : see also two re- tham, pp. 353—365. 
 presentations of the state of Ireland 
 
CHAPTER IV. 
 The Colony of the Pale 
 
 (From Henry VII. to James I.). 
 
 When the House of Tudor ascended the English throne a 
 marked change came over the relations of England to Ireland. 
 Following out in succession that bent for the establishment 
 of law and order which was the distinguishing characteristic 
 of these powerful sovereigns, a determined effort was made 
 to reduce to subjection the turbulent country. Henry the 
 Seventh was not firmly enough seated on the English throne to 
 accomplish much, but after the defeat of the Anglo-Irish ex- 
 pedition in favour of Simnel at Stoke he sent Sir Richard 
 Edgecombe in 1488 to exact new oaths of allegiance from the 
 Irish feudatories \ It is curious, therefore, to note that Henry 
 the Seventh seems to have considered that the policy of Henry 
 the Second as to the subjection of Ireland by the agency of 
 feudal lords, was the best plan of introducing order into the 
 country ; whereas in England his efforts were directed to break- 
 ing the power of the barons. After the Warbeck plots the 
 famous Statute of Drogheda termed 'Poyning's Law^' was 
 passed, which restricted the holding of Parliaments in Ireland 
 save when the causes and considerations of Acts intended to be 
 passed had been approved by the English King and Council^ 
 It was to the provision of this law respecting the maintenance 
 of a frontier fortification by the English settlement that the 
 term 'Colony of the Pale' is due. Acts of this date also 
 revive the Statute of Kilkenny*; contain many provisions for 
 
 1 Field, p. 248. then sent into Ireland as deputy. 
 
 2 Passed at Drogheda in November, ^ iq Henry VII. c. 4 (Irish). 
 1494, called after Sir Edward Poyning, * lb. c. 8 (Irish). 
 
56 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 the better protection of the Marches^; and deal with the heavy 
 exactions by the lords^ a very necessary step, for " doomed to 
 suffer by the peculiar oppressions of both countries, Ireland 
 was harassed not only by her own ancient exactions, coyne 
 and livery, but also by the English mode of extortion, pur- 
 veyance I" Eventually Henry the Seventh seems to have 
 abandoned his original plan of ruling by means of the 
 Anglo-Irish barons, for, with a view to crushing their power, 
 an Act was passed for the resumption of the greater part of 
 the crown grants made since the time of Edward the Second*. 
 It is important to bear in mind that though when first made 
 laws practically affected merely the Colony of the Pale, yet 
 as the power of the crown extended over Ireland so did the 
 statute law. 
 
 On the accession of Henry the Eighth a policy, at once 
 more extended in its aims and more vigorous in its execution 
 than had before characterized the English relations with Ire- 
 land, was entered upon. This as first carried out was free 
 from the severity which it afterwards developed^ Still fol- 
 lowing the idea of obtaining subjection by means of crown 
 feudatories Henry strove to resuscitate the system of Anglo- 
 Irish lords, and to assimilate the native Irish Princes to the 
 same model. The desire to vest large estates in the grantees 
 of the crown evidently aimed at the hold which would be 
 thus obtained upon such grantees by the forfeiture to which 
 their estates would become liable in case of treason; and it 
 was doubtless considered that the antagonism of interest 
 created between the feudal grantee and tribal usage would 
 lead to the total overthrow of the popular system I To the 
 ever recurrent overthrow of schemes which the English, to do 
 them justice, considered great reforms, must be ascribed much 
 
 1 10 Henry VII. c. 10 (Irish). doned most of the great men who had 
 
 2 lb. c. 18 (Irish). been engaged in the Warbeck Plot, 
 
 3 Moore, Vol. iii. p. 221. By 10 and the Liberties and Charter of 
 Hen. VII. c. 22 all the statutes made Youghal were restored and confirmed, 
 in England relating to the public weal Cox, p. 192. 
 
 were made good and effectual also ^ O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Revieic^ 
 
 as regards Ireland. 1887, p. 138. 
 
 ^ Cox, p. 189. Henry however par- ^ See Intro. A. L.of I. Vol. iii. 
 
IV.] FROM HENRY VIL TO JAMES I. 57 
 
 of the bitterness of feeling with which Irish customs were 
 regarded. 
 
 A report prepared for Henry the Eighth in 1515^ gives a 
 graphic description of the state of Ireland at that time ; after 
 prefacing that " Ther byn more than 60 countryes, called 
 Regyons, in Ireland, inhabytyd with the Kinges Irish enymyes ; 
 some region as bygge as a shyre, some more, some lesse, unto 
 a lytyll ; some as bygge as halffe a shyre and some a lytyll 
 lesse ; where reygneith more than 60 chyef Capytaynes wherof 
 
 some callyth themselffes Kynges, that lyveyth onely by the 
 
 swerde, and obeyeth to no other temperall person, but onely to 
 himself that is stronge ; and every of the said Capytaynes 
 makeyth warre and peace for hymself, and holdeith by swerde, 
 and hath imperiall jurysdyction within his rome, and obeyeth 
 to noo other person, Englyshe ne Iryshe, except only to suche 
 persones, as maye subdue hym by the swerde:" it deals at 
 some length with the native Irish and the Anglo-Irish leaders, 
 and says 
 
 " The names of the Countyes subjett unto the Kinge's lawes 
 Halff the countye of Uryell (Louth) by estimation 
 „ „ Meath 
 
 Dublyn 
 Kyldare 
 „ „ Wexford. 
 
 "All the comyn peoplle of the said halff countyes, that obey- 
 eth the Kynge's lawes, for the more parte ben of Iryshe byrthe, 
 of Iryshe habyte and of Iryshe langagel" The report con- 
 tinues that tribute was paid by the English settlement to the 
 wild Iryshe : — 
 
 "The countye of Uryell payeth yerely to the great Oneyll 40£ 
 
 Meath „ „ to Ochonour 300£ 
 
 „ „ Kyldare „ „ to the said Ochonour 20£ 
 
 ^ State of Ireland and a Plan for its ments in the same volume of the State 
 
 Reformation, State Papers, Henry VIII. Papers, pp. 338—481 as to the scarcity 
 
 Vol. II. part iii. pp. 1—30. This report of English. 
 
 is founded mainly on the ' Salus Po- 2 state Papers, Henry VIII. Vol. 11. 
 
 pwh'' of Pandarus. Compare also state- pt. iii. p. 8. 
 
58 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 The Kynge's exchequer payeth yerely to M^Murho 80 markes 
 
 „ Countye of Wexfor „ „ „ „ &toArteOboy 40£\" 
 
 And it is plain how greatly the means of exaction of both 
 the Irish and the English landed systems were pressed upon 
 the inhabitants of the Pale, for the report says that : — 
 
 " What with the extortion of coyne and lyverye dayly, and 
 wyth the wrongful exactions of osteing money, and of caryage 
 and cartage dayly, and what with the Kinge's greate subsydye 
 yerely, and with the said trybute and blak rent to the Kynge's 
 Iryshe enymyes, and other infynyt extortions and dayly 
 exactions^," they were even more heavily oppressed than the 
 inhabitants of the Marches. 
 
 Henry endeavoured to change this state of affairs by the 
 enforcement of English rule, and was to a certain limited 
 extent successfur\ His assumption of the title of King of Ire- 
 land was well received ; and by bribing the leading native chiefs 
 with the spoils of the Church, in the shape of lands formerly 
 belonging to the Irish abbeys*, he induced some of them to 
 surrender their lands and receive them again as feudal tenants. 
 It would seem, however, that the Irish Princes reserved to 
 themselves all their former privileges I Mr Froude observes 
 "Henry did not insist that the Irish, ill-trained as they had 
 been, should submit at once to English law. ... He disavowed 
 all intentions of depriving the chiefs of their lands, or of con- 
 fiscating their rights for the benefit of Englishmen. He 
 desired to persuade them to exchange their system of election 
 for a feudal tenure, to acknowledge by a formal act of sur- 
 render that they held their lordships under the crown... in 
 return they might retain and administer the more tolerable 
 of their own Brehon laws, till a more settled life brought with 
 it a desire for the English common law^" By similar gifts 
 of Church lands Henry won over many of the degenerate 
 
 1 State Papers, Henry VHI. VoL ii. by small crown rents is derived from 
 
 pt. iii. p. 9. these grants. 
 
 ^ lb. pp. 9, 10. ^ See Spenser's View of the State of 
 
 3 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Review^ Ireland, 1633, p. 4. 
 
 1887, p. 138. ^ The English in Ireland, Froude, 
 
 4 Some of the land in Ireland held Vol. i. pp. 37, 38. 
 
IV.] FROM HENRY VII. TO JAMES I. 59 
 
 barons', and he also endeavoured to prevent absenteeism, and 
 thus to strengthen the loyal element within the Pale. 
 
 This policy, if carried out to the full, might at least have 
 largely increased the English power in Ireland, even if it had 
 not ultimately led to the subjection of the whole island^; but 
 the narrow aims of the colonists of the Pale, whose desires 
 appear to have been centred in universal spoliation, and who 
 aimed at nothing but the division of the lands of ' the enemy ' 
 between themselves, opposed a barrier to the more liberal 
 methods of the English king. Before long also the religious 
 animosities^ arising out of the reformation added fuel to the 
 raging furnace of national passions, and brought all the powers 
 of bigotry and intolerance into play in the death struggle of 
 Irish independence. 
 
 At first the efforts of Henry to introduce the reformation 
 into Ireland did not raise as much opposition as might have 
 been expected from the Irish lords*, though the resistance of 
 the clergy^ rendered the attempt futile. The wars of Elizabeth 
 were in reality inspired by the lust of conquest and the an- 
 tagonism of race rather than by religious fervour; but from 
 the time when the Stuarts ascended the English throne the 
 crusade of religion began in earnest ; and Cromwell and his 
 fanatical soldiery gained those substantial temporal possessions 
 in Ireland (which for the first time justify its being termed a 
 completely conquered country) under the banner of religious 
 bigotry, and in the cause of religious intolerance. 
 
 1 Land holding in various countries^ the minds of the vanquished race. 
 Field, p. 250. The new feud of Protestant and Papist 
 
 2 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. R. p. 138. inflamed the old feud of Saxon and 
 
 3 " The patriotism of the Irish had Celt." Lord Macaulay's Hist, of Eng- 
 taken a peculiar direction. The object land, Vol. i. p. 34. 
 
 of their animosity was not Rome but ^ But the Geraldines were a conspi- 
 
 England; and they had especial rea- cuous exception. 
 
 son to abhor those English sovereigns ^ Cromer, Archbishop of Armagh 
 
 who had been the head of the great and Primate of Ireland, was a vigorous 
 
 schism, Henry the Eighth and Eliza- opponent of Henry. This is the same 
 
 beth. During the vain struggle which Cromer who in 1553 obtained a formal 
 
 two generations of Milesian princes pardon for having made use of the 
 
 maintained against the Tudors, reli- Brehon laws. (Pat. and Close Rolls of 
 
 gious enthusiasm and national enthu- Chancery in Ireland, 24 and 25 Hen. 
 
 siasm became inseparably blended in VIII.) 
 
60 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 The earlier portion of the reign of Elizabeth was marked 
 by the theoretical confiscation of Ulster, which, however, re- 
 mained practically unsubdued ; by an attempt to levy assess- 
 ments by Royal authority independent of the sanction of 
 Parliament ; and finally by some claims to lands in Cork under 
 alleged charters dating from the time of the old Norman 
 feudal grants \ Plans for colonization also were laid before 
 the English government by those who had no title, but offered 
 to defray the costs of conquest in consideration of grants from 
 the conquered territory'^. 
 
 The Anglo-Irish lords and Irish chieftains, with no small 
 reason, felt that the seal of doom was upon them, and the 
 brewing trouble took form in the rising at first headed by 
 Sir John Desmond, the treacherous murderer of Henry Davels, 
 and afterwards by the Earl of Desmond. Religious motives 
 strengthened this outbreak, and indeed almost created it ; but 
 although aided by a small expedition of Italian and Spanish 
 volunteers, the futile effort ended in desolation and despair, and 
 so complete was the ravage and wreck in Munster that "the 
 lowing of a cow or the sound of a ploughboy's whistle was not 
 to be heard from Valentia to the rock of CasheP," From the 
 widespread confiscations which followed, a supply of lands was 
 obtained, sufficient, it would seem, to have been a most potent 
 bribe to the new settler class that it was the policy of the English 
 crown to plant on the Irish soil. Half a million acres'* escheated 
 to the crown, and were divided into lots of 12,000, 8,000, 
 6,000 and 4,000 acres respectively. The rents reserved were 
 practically nil, an estate at fee farm of 12,000 acres being only 
 rented at £33. 6s. 8d. for three years, and then at £66. ISs. 4td. 
 The scheme designed for the plantation was briefly that every 
 
 1 Field, pp. 250 and 251. in towns and cities ; nor yet see any 
 
 2 This method of raising money from beasts but the very wolves, the foxes, 
 * Undertakers ' afterwards became com- and other ravening beasts." Quoted by 
 mon. Hallam, Const. Hist, of Eng. vol. iii, 
 
 3 " Whosoever did travel from one pp. 366, 367. And see John Hooker's 
 end to the other of all Munster, even dedicatory epistle to Girald. Cambr. in 
 from Waterford to Limerick which is Holinshed's Chronicles^ vol. i. 
 
 about six score miles, he should not •* 574,628 acres, 
 
 meet any man, woman, or child, saving 
 
IV.] FROM HENRY VII. TO JAMES I. 61 
 
 seigniory should be inhabited within seven years on the fol- 
 lowing system: — "every undertaker of 12,000 acres was bound 
 to plant eighty-six families : his own family was to have 1,600 
 acres, one chief farmer 400, two good farmers 600, two other 
 farmers 400, fourteen freeholders (each 300) 4,200, forty copy- 
 holders (each 100) 4,000, twenty-six cottagers and labourers 
 800. Other undertakers being bound proportionately \" 
 
 In 1586 an immense quantity of fertile land was practically 
 going begging ; lands were offered at twopence an acre with no 
 rent to be required for the first three years'^ yet the fruitful 
 soil scarce found an owner. By the original design of the 
 plantation the grants of land were to have been conditional 
 on the settlement on the soil by the undertakers of English 
 tenants, but the idea had to be abandoned. The practical 
 failure of the plantation, at any rate, to answer the purpose 
 for which it was designed, i.e. the ousting of the native popu- 
 lation, was mainly due to (1) the extensive grants made to 
 particular individuals^ who themselves remained absentees, 
 making but small and unsuccessful efforts to plant English 
 sub-tenants, and who moreover were not averse to an Irish 
 tenantry (since they paid higher rent than any for which 
 English small holders* could be induced to settle) ; and (2) the 
 short terms for which lands were granted by the English 
 undertakers. The uncertainty of possession and the exactions 
 levied on the tenants prevented any real improvement of the 
 land, and led to its being wastefully impoverished. No 
 buildings worthy of the name were erected, and the wretched 
 slave of the soil lived a life but one degree above that of 
 the animals he tended. Any gathering of wealth brought 
 ruin ; coshered by some wandering ex-chief, or rack-rented by 
 some English undertaker, the small holder presented an em- 
 blem of misery. 
 
 When dealing with the reorganization of much of the Irish 
 land system which took place during the reign of Elizabeth, the 
 
 1 Sigerson, p. 33. * See a passage from Kobert Paine's 
 
 2 Field, 251. Briefe Description of Ireland (1589), 
 ^ Sir Walter Raleigh obtained 42,000 quoted p. 35 Sigerson. 
 
 acres in Cork and Waterford. 
 
62 THE COLONY OF THE PALE [CHAP. 
 
 * Composition of Connaught,' planned under a Commission 
 issued in 1585, with the object of inducing the nobles of 
 Connaught to surrender their titles and hold instead by letters 
 patent^ from the crown, should not be passed over. It was 
 one of the first of a succession of legal devices for the change 
 of Irish tenures into feudal ones. Few chieftains, however, 
 agreed to the change, which would have greatly altered the 
 relations of chiefs and people both inter se and towards the 
 land. The principle proposed in the change was that a pay- 
 ment of IO5. for every 120 acres should operate as a discharge 
 from all cess, taxation tallage, charges, bearing of soldiers, 
 &c., and that a rent should be payable for the lands ; while the 
 customs of Gavelkind and Tanistry were to be abolished. In 
 several of the indentures^ also the mean freeholders were 
 placed in direct dependence on the crown, a remarkable fact 
 bearing a strong resemblance to the effect of 'quia emptores,' 
 and establishing something greatly like a peasant proprietary. 
 Though this abortive scheme is not of great importance, for 
 few chieftains surrendered under it (though the surrender was 
 widespread under the commission of James the First), still when 
 the plans of Wentworth with regard to Connaught are remem- 
 bered, an interest is felt in the nature of the titles so un- 
 scrupulously attacked : and in regard to those of the Irishry 
 who had surrendered their estates and received a re-grant, it 
 is hard to find words strong enough to describe the injustice 
 of the pretext on which it was attempted to oust them. 
 
 In August 1598 the flame of open revolt again broke out, 
 this time in Ulster under Hugh O'Neil (afterwards Earl of 
 Tyrone), and O'Donnell. With the war-cry of religion added 
 to the stored wealth of national hatred^, indued with a fury 
 
 1 By 12 Eliz. c. 4 (Irish) a power ^ This enactment is to be found in 
 
 had been given by which any of the the indentures for Eoscommon, Sligo, 
 
 Irishry or degenerate EngUsh were Mayo and Leitrim — and Dr Sigerson 
 
 enabled on surrender to obtain grants suggests it may have had a bearing on 
 
 of their lands by letter patent from "the after quietness of the western 
 
 the crown— defects appearing in the provinces," p. 31. 
 
 letters patent issued under this Act, ^ -jhe dispossession of the Catholic 
 
 they were remedied by James I. in 1615 clergy by Elizabeth and the substitu- 
 
 by new surrenders and re-grants. tion of what has been well termed ' a 
 
IV.] FROM HENRY VII. TO JAMES I. 63 
 
 such as is almost without parallel, the strife raged. Philip 
 of Spain, smarting from the defeat of his designs on England 
 and burning with a lust for revenge, sent aid, and O'Neil was 
 no ordinary leader; but the doom of destruction was on the 
 Celts. Ravage and ruin was spread broadcast through the 
 land, but the result of the struggle was never really in doubt. 
 No sooner was the conduct of the war entrusted to Mountjoy 
 than the fate of the Irish was sealed, and in 1602 all was 
 over. From the horrors of the prolonged war, as from so many 
 another blood-stained page of Irish history, one can but turn 
 with loathing. 
 
 The revolt is important in its ultimate bearing on the 
 history of the Irish land, though no important forfeitures were 
 immediately exacted. The leaders of the rising were treated 
 with singular mercy as one by one they surrendered, O'Neil 
 himself being left in his Earldom ; but O'Neil and O'Donnell 
 were marked men. Elizabeth again tried the policy, so often 
 unsuccessful, of a leniency which was neither respected nor 
 understood. Four years later, in the reign of James the First, 
 O'Neil and the Earl of TyrconneP, detected in planning another 
 outbreak, fled the country, and their immense estates escheated 
 to the crown. 
 
 Some two millions of acres — the counties of Donegal, Derry, 
 Cavan, Fermanagh, Armagh and Tyrone — were thus placed 
 at the disposal of the English; but, only 511,465 were actually 
 taken up by the crown. The way in which this half million of 
 acres was primarily granted is shown by the following table ^ : 
 To the Londoners and other undertakers : 209,800 
 The Bishops' mensal lands 3,413 
 
 „ „ termons and erenachs 72,280 
 
 „ College of Dublin 9,600 
 
 college of shepherds without sheep' would have been tried by the Desmonds 
 
 let loose upon the people a body of and Tyrones, independent of this 
 
 ecclesiastics, who, themselves smarting motive. 
 
 under their injuries, helped to stir i Brother of the O'Donnell of the 
 
 that spirit of rebellion which was revolt, who died in Spain, 
 
 simmering throughout the country ; 2 Taken from Short Hist, of Irish 
 
 but as is remarked by Hallam (vol. People, A. G. Kichey, p. 605. 
 III. p. 365) the chances of insurrection 
 
64- THE COLONY OF THE PALE. [CHAP. IV. 
 
 For free schools 2,700 
 
 To Incumbents for glebes 18,000 
 
 The old glebes 1,268 
 
 To Deans and Prebends 1,473 
 
 „ servitors and natives 116,330 
 
 „ impropriations and abbey lands 21,552 
 
 The old patentees and forts 38,214 
 
 To new corporations 8,887 
 
 Restored to Maguire 5,980 
 
 Restored to several Irish 1,468 
 
 The scheme of plantation drawn up in 1609^ provided for 
 the settlement upon these lands of large numbers of small 
 tenants, and a colony of Scotch and English Protestants, mainly 
 'labourers, weavers, mechanics, farmers and merchants/ was 
 established on the escheated territory. Frugal and hard- 
 working the new settlers established an era of apparent pros- 
 perity, and until 1641 lived side by side with the native race^ 
 with less open hostility than might have been expected. 
 
 1 Fully treated of in the next Chapter. tory, some million and a half acres, 
 
 2 To whom the unappropriated terri- had been restored. 
 
PAKT II. 
 
 lEELAND THE SLAVE. 
 
 M. 
 
CHAPTER V. 
 
 The substitution of English Tenures and the 
 Era of Protestant Ascendency. 
 
 There is every reason to believe that the changes first 
 systematically introduced in the reign of James the First were 
 conceived in a liberal spirit, and honestly designed to benefit 
 an unhappy country groaning under the yoke of heavy oppres- 
 sions ; but the fatal mistake of implanting a comparatively ad- 
 vanced civilization upon a society unfit to receive it converted 
 what was intended as a benefit into a curse. What would 
 have been the effect of a recognition of the Brehon Law, and an 
 application of the machinery of Courts and determinate sanc- 
 tions to its system is difficult to say, probably it would have 
 forced into unnatural prominence many customs which had 
 only a theoretical existence^; but it is hard in the light of later 
 events not to think that this might have been the less of two 
 evils. The history of the final abolition of the Irish code is 
 simple. Two decisions of the Courts in the reign of James the 
 First, whereby the whole land system of the Brehon Law was 
 crumbled into dust, became of great importance, since they 
 followed the conquests of war, and hence affected practically the 
 whole of Ireland. One, by the decision of all the Judges ('per 
 tons les justices') declared void in law the Irish custom of 
 Gavelkind succession, while the other abolished Tanistry. 
 
 The judgment in Gavelkind which is fully reported by Sir 
 John Davies is worthy of close examination. The reasons given 
 in it for the decision are : — 
 
 ^ Sir H. Maine considered that this cognition in India of the Indian cus- 
 has largely been the result of our re- toms. 
 
 0—2 
 
68 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. 
 
 (1) That the frequent partitions and the removals of the 
 tenants from one portion to another caused great uncertainty 
 of possession to be felt, and led to no civil habitations 
 being erected, or enclosures and improvements made (instancing 
 the case of Ulster, "which seemed to be all one wilderness 
 before the new plantation made by the English undertakers 
 there"). 
 
 (2) That it differed from Kentish Gavelkind^ in that the 
 latter : — 
 
 i. Only parted the lands between the next heirs male, 
 who took estates of inheritance. 
 
 ii. Excluded bastards. 
 
 iii. Endowed the wife with a moiety. 
 
 iv. Permitted females to take in default of males ; 
 none of which characteristics were present in Irish Gavelkind. 
 
 (3) That in several ways it resembled the custom of 
 Gavelkind used in North Wales, which was abolished by 
 34 Hen. VIII. c. 28. 
 
 The judgment therefore says that " for these reasons and 
 because all the said Irish countries, and the inhabitants of 
 them, from henceforward, were to be governed by the rules 
 of the Common Law of England, it was resolved and declared 
 by all the Judges, that the said Irish custom of Gavelkind was 
 void in law, not only for the inconvenience and unreasonable- 
 ness of it, but because it was a mere personal custom and could 
 not alter the descent of inheritance. And therefore all the 
 lands in these Irish countries were now adjudged to descend 
 according to the course of the Common Law, and that wives 
 should be endowed, and the daughters should be inheritable 
 to these lands notwithstanding this Irish usage or custom I" 
 This judgment was, by the special order of the lord deputy, 
 registered amongst the Acts of Council^. 
 
 1 Of which in reality, however, it ^ And this provision was added ** if 
 was but a more primitive form. For a any of the mere Irish had possessed 
 contemporary account of Kentish Ga- and enjoyed any portion of land by 
 velkind see A Treatise of Gavelkind, this Irish custom of Gavelkind before 
 by William Sumner, London, 1660. the reign of James the First, they 
 
 2 Hill, 3, Jacobi. Davies' Reports, should be continued and established 
 pp. 134 — 138. in it, but that all such should hence- 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OE PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 69 
 
 Not less important than this decision is the one by which 
 the custom of Tanistry was declared void. It was given upon 
 a special verdict found in ejectment between Murrough Mac 
 Bryan, plaintiff, and Cahir O'Callaghan, defendant ; the ques- 
 tion being whether the title of the heir at Common Law, which 
 lay in the defendant, or the title of the Tanaist, which was the 
 estate of the plaintiff, should prevail. The case remained in 
 the King's Bench for three or four years, and was argued 
 several times, while the Judges on different occasions delivered 
 their opinions on the various points raised. The suit termi- 
 nated in an agreement by consent for a division ; it was, how- 
 ever, finally settled by the Court that "the said custom of 
 Tanistry was void in itself, and abolished when the Common 
 Law of England was established." 
 
 By these two decisions the law of a nation, which, whatever 
 its faults, was ingrained in their national life, and regarded by 
 them with that unreasoning devotion which is one of the 
 curious contradictions of the Celtic nature, was swept away. 
 While giving all due credit to the disinterested motives of the 
 English Crown and its advisers, and to the strict impartiality 
 of the judicial decisions, there seems to be no doubt from the 
 lesson of history that a grave error was committed and a sub- 
 stantial injustice done. Despite the recognition by the Brehon 
 Laws of the existence of individual property, a large majority of 
 the land seems to have been ruled by a more or less modified 
 form of the customs of Tanistry and Gavelkind ; and though 
 the extensive growth of the power of the chief makes it evident 
 that in reality the practical development of tenure, and even 
 of primogeniture, was not far distant, still the native Irish were 
 as far from recognizing the fact as were the English rulers who 
 implanted the feudal system upon them. The ignorant Irish 
 tribesman had no notion that the exactions of his chieftain 
 were by imperceptible degrees taking the form of rent, on the 
 contrary he was driven by them to cling more closely to the 
 soil by a hundred ties of attachment ; while the chief more 
 
 forth be adjudged and descend accord- Plowden's Historical Review of the 
 ing to the Common Law." See also state of Ireland. 
 Furlong's Landlord and Tenant; and 
 
70 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENOLISH TENURES [cHAP. 
 
 and more regarded the land as a mere source of revenue. 
 Into the hands of the law officials of James the First was in- 
 trusted the impossible task of solving satisfactorily a land 
 problem in which each free member of a tribe who received 
 land in fee would think that he got no more than his due, while 
 those who were neglected, or whose portions not being to their 
 taste must have longed for the old system of redistribution, 
 would imagine themselves forcibly robbed. To these we must 
 also add a certain class of tribesmen, owners of small portions 
 of the tribe-land, who were altogether disregarded by Sir John 
 Davies. The Attorney-General in his letter to the Earl of 
 Salisbury in 1607 when describing the manner in which the land 
 was portioned amongst the septs, and pointing out that almost 
 every acre had a several owner owing to the expansion of the 
 system of distribution by Gavelkind, says, " we made every en- 
 quiry what portion of land or services every man held in every 
 ballibetagh\ beginning with such first as had lands and ser- 
 vices ; and after naming such as had the greatest quantity of 
 land and so descending into such as possess only two taths; 
 then we stayed, for lower we could not go, because we knew 
 the purpose of the State was only to establish such freeholders 
 as are fit to serve on juries I" It is necessary also to bear in 
 mind the position of the next generation of 'mere Irish' to those 
 to whom the grants were made. Thus A, a free member of the 
 sept, receives a grant of lands in fee — he has issue four sons, 
 B, C, D and E. Under the old system each on his birth would 
 have become a member of the sept, he would have looked on 
 all the lands of the sept as in a sense his property, since from 
 them in due course his allotment would have been received. 
 Under the new system B, the eldest, is alone entitled to lands, 
 and these only on his father's death. Assuredly C, D and E 
 
 1 The ancient Irish land measures ballybetaghs is well nigh as large as 
 
 differ so much that it is hard to ex- Monaghan which contains 100. See 
 
 plain what extent of land is denoted fully on this subject Skene's CeZf. «Scof., 
 
 by any term. According to Sir John Vol. iii. pp. 153 — 170. 
 
 Davies, in Fermanagh a ballybetagh is ^ Appended to the early editions of 
 
 equal to 16 taths, but he then goes on the Discoverie. 
 to say that Fermanagh containing 51 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 71 
 
 (and probably B also) would think that the hated English had 
 robbed them of their birthright. 
 
 The task of Sir John Da vies was truly no light one, and 
 the way in which he viewed the situation and his manner of 
 dealing with it are worthy of the closest attention. Speaking 
 of Tanistry and Gavelkind he says, "these two Irish customs 
 made all their possessions uncertain, being shuffled, and 
 changed, and removed so often from one to another, by new 
 elections and partitions ; which uncertainty of estates hath bin 
 the true cause of such desolation and barbarism in this land, 
 as the like hath not been seen in any country that professed 
 the name of Christ \" He goes on to state that the Act passed 
 in 12 Eliz.^, enabling the Lord Deputy to take surrenders and 
 re-grant estates to the Irishry, was defective, since (1) few lords 
 made such surrenders, and (2) "they which made surrenders 
 of entire counties obtained grants of the whole againe to them- 
 selves only, and to no other, and all in demesne. In passing 
 of which grants there was no care taken of the inferiour Septes 
 of people, inhabiting and possessing these counties under them, 
 but they held their severall portions in course of Tanistry and 
 Gavelkind, and yielded the same Irish duties or exactions, as 
 they did before ^" Then alluding to the two Commissions 
 which issued under James the First, the one to accept sur- 
 renders and to make re-grants, and the other to strengthen 
 defective titles, he states ; " in the execution of which Com- 
 missions there hath ever bin had a special care, to settle and 
 secure the Under-Tenants, to the end that there might be a 
 repose and establishment of every subject's estate^;" the fol- 
 lowing being the plan adopted ; " when an Irish lord doth 
 offer to surrender his country, his surrender is not immediately 
 accepted, but a commission is first awarded to enquire of these 
 special points. First, of the quantity and limits of the land 
 
 * Discoveries p. 170. 4 Irish) recites that the Irish had 
 
 - The instructions given to the Earl petitioned to surrender and authorizes 
 
 of Suffolk in 1560 by Elizabeth sug- the granting of letters patent. 
 
 gested that the Irish chiefs should sur- ^ Discoverie, pp. 270, 271. 
 
 render their estates and take grants in ^ Discoverie, p. 273. 
 
 tail male ; the Act of 1569 (12 Eliz. c. 
 
72 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP 
 
 whereof he is the reputed owner. Next how much himself 
 doth hold in demesne, and how much is possessed by his 
 tenants and followers. And thirdly, what customs, duties and 
 services he doth yearly receive out of those lands. This in- 
 quisition being made and returned, the lands which are found 
 to bee the lord's proper possessions in demesne, are drawn into 
 a Particular ; and his Irish duties ; as cosherings, cessings, 
 Rents of Butter and Oatmeale and the like ; are reasonably 
 valued and reduced into certaine summes of Money to be 
 paide yearely in lieu thereof This being done, the surrender 
 is accepted ; and thereupon a grant passed, not of the whole 
 country, as was used in former times, but of those lands only, 
 which are found in the lord's possession, and of those certaine 
 summes of money, as rents issuing out of the rest. But the 
 lands which are found to be possessed by the tenants, are left 
 unto them, respectively charged with these certain rents only, 
 in lieu of all uncertain Irish exactions. In like manner upon 
 all Grants which have passed by virtue of the Commission, 
 for defective titles, the Commissioners have taken special 
 caution, for the preservation of the estates of all particular 
 tenants." 
 
 Sir John Davies had, it is evident, clearly grasped the fact 
 of the proprietary rights of the members of the tribe in the 
 tribe-land ; but the sweeping nature of the change introduced, 
 and the conflicting character of the rights involved, rendered 
 his settlement an unstable one. Even if the inferior members 
 of the sept were, as stated by him, satisfied and encouraged by 
 the settlement and security of their tenure, the chief was 
 grievously wounded by the restriction of what he considered his 
 inalienable rights^; and subsequent events almost obliterated 
 the class of freehold owners which Sir John Davies had laboured 
 to create. The mode, however, in which the Irish tribesmen 
 were considered in relation to the land is plain, and the system 
 adopted amounts to an acknowledgment of the claims of the 
 tribal freeman to an estate in the land. The injury inflicted 
 iTpon the Irish peasantry lay indeed not so much in the 
 
 1 See " The Historical Claims of January, 1881, p. 27, Seebohm. 
 Tenant-Kiglit," Nineteenth Century, 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OP PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. '73 
 
 introduction of the English tenures, as in the after refusal to 
 recognize the rights of the tenantry established under the 
 compulsory reorganizations of the land system. In the Com- 
 mission for making shires in 1605 the principle of the ex- 
 istence of tenant-right was also recognized: for the conduct 
 of many persons who, pretending to be lords, had expelled 
 ancient tenants or imposed exactions upon them "under pre- 
 tence that the said tenantes or freeholders are but tenantes- 
 at-will, albeit they and their ancestors have enjoyed the same 
 by course of descent for many hundred yeares past," is repro- 
 bated \ 
 
 In 1608, on the flight abroad of the two Earls^ their estates 
 were, as has been described in the last chapter, forfeited to the 
 Crown. It will be necessary to go at some length into the 
 nature and regulations of the colony which was planted on the 
 most fertile portion of this territory, and it will be seen that 
 at first sight the plan devised was not inequitable. Still it 
 must be remembered that in many ways this plantation 
 was a deliberate undoing of the work of Sir John Davies. 
 The rights of the newly created freeholders obtained little 
 recognition, and were frequently infringed on behalf of the 
 settlers, and even where their rights were not actually dis- 
 turbed a feeling of insecurity was given to the new tenures, 
 the one thing it was most important to avoid. It is perhaps 
 worthy of note that it has been alleged that the disgavelling 
 which preceded the forfeitures Was part of a deep plot of the 
 English, who considered, on the analogy of the Gavelkind lands 
 in Kent, that Irish Gavelkind lands would be more protected 
 against escheat than those held by knight-service. The faults 
 of the suggestion are obvious. It is true that the very nature 
 of the Brehon Law is far too archaic to recognize such forms 
 of ownership as the principle of escheat involves, but the 
 theory of Gavelkind had never before been allowed to interfere 
 with the rights of the Crown in Ireland to escheats, and both 
 Earls held from the Crown long before the 'Case of Gavel- 
 kind.' The suggestion is a very fair example of the amount of 
 
 1 Sigerson, Hist, of Land Tenure ^j ggg ante, p. 63. 
 
 and Land Glasses, p. 104 (note.) 
 
74 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. 
 
 ingenious perversion which is always applied to the acts of 
 the English in Ireland. 
 
 The plantation of the colony in Ulster was evidently ela- 
 borated with no small care by James the First and his ad- 
 visers \ who adopted in the main a project drawn up by the 
 Privy Council of Ireland ^ Orders and Conditions^ were issued 
 for the guidance of the undertakers who applied for grants of 
 land, commencing as follows: — "His Majesty in his princely 
 bounty, not respecting his own profit, but the public peace 
 and welfare of the kingdom, is graciously pleased to distribute 
 the said lands to such of his subjects, as well of Great Britain 
 as of Ireland, as being of merit and ability shall seek the same 
 with a mind not only to benefit themselves, but to do service 
 to the Crown and common wealth," The most noticeable points 
 of the proposed scheme of plantation were that the lands to be 
 distributed were divided into lots of 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 
 English acres respectively, and the undertakers to whom such 
 lots were committed were separated into three classes, namely : 
 
 (1) " English or Scottish, as well servitors'' as others, who 
 are to plant their portions with English, or inland Scottish 
 inhabitants." 
 
 (2) " Servitors in the kingdom of Ireland, who may take 
 mere Irish, English or inland Scottish tenants at their choice." 
 
 (3) " Natives of Ireland who are to be made freeholders ^" 
 The rents of the English and Scottish undertakers were 
 
 fixed at £5. 6s. Od. for every 1,000 acres, and no charge of rent 
 was to be made for the first two years. The nature of their 
 tenure was as follows. Every grantee of 2,000 acres was to 
 hold by knight's service in capite ; and every grantee of 1,000 
 acres was to hold in common socage, no wardships being ex- 
 acted upon the first descent of that land. The undertakers 
 and their tenants were to erect within two years castles and 
 
 1 Though the plantation was pro- project is quoted in full, pp. 105 — 120. 
 
 j acted by the king and by Bacon it was 3 gee Harris' Hibernica, p. 123 et 
 
 chiefly carried into effect by Sir Arthur seq. 
 
 Chichester, who appears to have dis- ^ The servitors were of two kinds, 
 
 played great resources, and who received (1) great officers of the state, (2) rich 
 
 a large allotment himself. adventurers from England. 
 
 2. See Harris' Hibemica, where this ^ Harris' Hibernica, p. 114. 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OP PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 75 
 
 buildings ; they were forbidden to alienate their holdings to the 
 ' mere Irish/ and were not allowed to create tenancies at 
 will. The undertakers were bound within two years to place 
 upon their lands a competent number of tenants and the rent 
 was to be a fixed sum; special proviso being made against 
 cuttings, cosherings, and other Irish exactions \ 
 
 The above rules appear to be framed in a liberal and 
 thoughtful spirit, and show much consideration for the best 
 interests of the land. The rules applicable to the Irish natives 
 who were admitted as freeholders also seem to be both mag- 
 nanimous and well considered. They are mainly as follows : — 
 their estates to be in fee farm, the yearly rent being 
 £10. 13s. 4<d. for each portion of 1,000 acres, and no rent to 
 be payable for the first year; their tenures to be similar to 
 those of the other undertakers with a proviso of forfeiture on 
 rebellion. They were to inhabit their lands and to build castles 
 and houses ; but no Irish exactions were to be taken ^. As 
 regards the class of native small-holders in Ulster, it would 
 seem that these rules might have afforded a satisfactory posi- 
 tion, but unfortunately the plantation was not ultimately 
 carried out quite as designed. The native Irish were fre- 
 quently unjustly ousted to make way for new English settlers, 
 and the engine of English law, the theory and methods of 
 which were completely strange to the native race, was only 
 too often used to establish claims of the Crown in the native 
 holdings. In other parts of Ireland this was even more the case 
 than in Ulster, " in King's and Queen's Counties, and in those 
 of Leitrim, Longford and Westmeath, 385,000 acres were ad- 
 judged to the Crown, and 66,000 in that of Wicklow," so that, 
 though much was re-granted to the Irish, it shook their sense 
 of possession^; while the flagrant injustice with which the 
 claims of the Crown were often prosecuted, rankled in their 
 minds. Meanwhile the energetic class of artizans and me- 
 
 ^ See Orders and Conditions for the while the beneficed clergy were cared 
 
 planters of Ulster given in Harris' for by more provision being made for 
 
 Hibernica, from a copy printed in 1608. them. And see ante, pp. 63, 64. 
 
 2 Harris' Hibernica, p. 129. The ^ Hallam's Constitutional History, 
 
 lands which had been lost to the Church Vol. iii. ch. 18, p. 377. 
 during the late troubles were restored, 
 
76 THE StTBSTITtJTlON OF ENGLISH TENUKES [cHAP. 
 
 chanics of the English settlement throve and prospered a- 
 mazingly, and the sun of prosperity seemed at last breaking 
 through the heavy pall of misgovernment and misery which 
 had enveloped Ireland's history. The forfeitures from which 
 the grants had been derived, however, had cast without sup- 
 port upon the land a body of improvident, vicious and dan- 
 gerous men, the descendants of the former chiefs; and the 
 weapon of religious strife lay ready to their hands. As early 
 as 1611 there were not wanting signs of brewing trouble to be 
 detected by the far-seeing \ 
 
 On the surface all went well. The Act 13 Jac. I. c. 5^ re- 
 peals many of the statutes in which the Irish are treated as 
 the common enemy, and extends to all the king's subjects the 
 same laws ; while the language of the statute reads in striking 
 contrast to that of earlier legislation — "Whereas in former 
 times... the natives of this realm of Irish blood... were for the 
 most part in continual hostility with the English, and with 
 those who did descend of the English, and therefore the said 
 Irish were held and accounted and in divers statutes and 
 records were termed and called Irish enemies. Forasmuch as 
 the cause of the said difference and of the making of the said 
 laws and statutes doth now cease, in that all the natives and 
 inhabitants of this kingdom, without difference or distinction 
 are taken into his majesty's protection, and do now live under 
 one law, by means whereof a perfect agreement is or ought to 
 be settled betwixt all of his majesty's subjects in this realm. 
 And forasmuch as there is no better means to settle peace and 
 tranquillity in this kingdom, being now inhabited with many 
 worthy persons born in his majesty's several kingdoms, than 
 by abolishing the said laws and giving them free liberty to 
 commerce and match together, so that they may grow into one 
 nation, and there be so utter oblivion and extinguishment of 
 all former differences and discords between them; be it enacted 
 ...that all the said laws be for ever utterly repealedl" 
 
 The Ulster settlement in the course of years accumulated 
 certain customary modes of dealing with the tenant's interest in 
 
 1 See the report of Sir George Carew. ^ gee Froude, Eng. in Ireland, p. 70. 
 
 2 (Irish). 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 77 
 
 the land. At the present time these exist in the much discuss- 
 ed "Ulster custom'." Its origin is uncertain, but it has plainly- 
 been built up partially on rude notions of equity, and partially 
 on a blending of the Irish notions with those of the settlers. 
 The customs as to land tenure of the Scotch and Welsh tenants 
 planted in Ulster must have been in many ways similar to 
 those of their Irish neighbours, and it is possible that the Irish 
 notions were gradually assimilated to a theory of land tenancy 
 strongly resembling copyhold. Unfortunately the Calvinistic 
 Protestantism of the settlement did something towards adding 
 to the discordant nature of the social system and the animosity 
 of the dispossessed owners of the soil. The Catholics daily 
 gained strength by union in misfortune, and became more 
 and more impatient of the existence of the alien plantation. 
 No excuse, however, for the terrible flood of butchery, cruelty 
 and massacre which the inhuman insurrection of 1641 produced 
 is possible. To the end of time there will rest on the shield of 
 Ireland's honour the bloodstain of this debauch of ruthless 
 slaughter. The real cause of the outbreak is rather to be 
 found in the land troubles ^ than in religious differences. The 
 scheme of a plantation in Connaught had been advancing with 
 gigantic strides^ The Commission on defective titles had 
 extended its fatal grasp all over the country; nor did the 
 patents granted under James the First's Commission prove 
 much protection*, despite that large sums had often been paid 
 as composition to remedy defects. The despicable discoverers 
 laboured hard, and titles were infamously impeached. Four- 
 fifths of Connaught were proved in strict construction to belong 
 to the Crown ^ and the methods of Wentworth, now Earl of 
 Strafford, produced a frenzy of rage, the aid not merely of 
 
 1 See post, pp. 117—123. of the mere legal formality of the en- 
 
 2 Among the complaints of the lead- rolment of grants made in the time^of 
 ers of the Rebellion is found a protest Elizabeth and James I.) it is hard to 
 against "The avoidance of grants of conceive. 
 
 lands and liberties by quirks and quid- ^ j^/jg Cromwellian Settlement, Pren- 
 
 dities of the law," Sigerson, p. 74. dergast, p. 47. 
 
 3 A plan of plunder more disgraceful ^ y/jg j^^g i^ Ireland, Froude, p. 80. 
 (founded as it was upon the omissioij 
 
78 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. 
 
 chicane but even of torture^ being called in to assist the 
 general spoliation. The Connaught Commission paid no heed 
 to the agreement which in 1634 had been made with Charles 
 the First that only sixty years' title need be shown''. Deeds 
 and papers had perished in the many wars of those disturbed 
 times, and the Celt, loving the land as only a Celt can, saw it 
 about to be torn from him wholesale. On the 23rd of October, 
 1641, the massacre commenced, and the lowest estimate of those 
 who perished is 37,000, while Mr Froude believes that before 
 the insurrection was suppressed more than half a million^ had 
 succumbed. 
 
 However varied the causes which led to the insurrection, to 
 the England of the Puritans it bore but one aspect, and Crom- 
 well when he landed in 1649 came as the champion of the 
 Protestant cause, to revenge with fire and sword the evil deeds 
 of the ' Popish fiends.' How complete his conquest was is a 
 matter of history, and a grim picture is drawn by the state- 
 ment that so was the co-untry wasted that even the victorious 
 English army well nigh starved. The bearing of Cromwell's 
 conquest, and the subsequent confiscation of more than a third 
 of the land of Ireland, on the history of the land law was 
 immense. High and low, Irish chieftain and Irish peasant, 
 together with the descendants of many of the English settlers 
 of the various earlier settlements, were proscribed on the ground 
 of their religion, their estates passing into the hands of the 
 Puritan soldiery. The half depopulated country, thousands of 
 the inhabitants of which were shipped to the West Indies or 
 driven to take refuge on the Continent, was colonized by 
 Saxons of Calvinistic faith ; yet under the ' iron rule ' there was 
 prosperity, buildings and plantations were made, and the value 
 and rent of land increased daily. The principle of the Crom- 
 wellian Settlement was the foundation of a Protestant military 
 colony, extending over all the most fruitful portion of the land. 
 The native Irish were to be banished to Connaught, which 
 
 1 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Review, ^ See Field, p. 253 (note). 
 
 1887, p. 139. And see the case of the ^ Following Sir William Petty, see 
 
 Byrnes of Wicklow. Carte's Life of Froude, Eng. in Ireland, Vol. i. p. 125. 
 Ormonde, bk. 1, p. 74. 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 79 
 
 Cromwell determined to make a second Wales, only two classes 
 of persons being exempted from transplantation, (1) those 
 who could prove 'constant good affection,' and (2) the mere 
 earth-tillers, viz. 'all husbandmen, plowmen, labourers, arti- 
 ficers and others of the inferior sort.' The settlement, how- 
 ever, when established differed in many ways from the military 
 landlordism which had been intended. Land bonds had been 
 issued to the adventurers in 1642, and money had been 
 advanced on the security of nearly a million acres. Again in 
 1653, in order to meet the arrears of pay due to Cromwell's 
 army and sums still due to the adventurers, a most thorough 
 act of confiscation had been passed. The debenture bonds 
 payable in land which had been issued to defray military ex- 
 penses passed into various hands ; and the similar bonds issued 
 to Cromwell's own soldiers^ had in many cases been disposed of 
 by them ; still the country largely passed into the hands of the 
 men who had conquered it. A study of Dr Petty's^ History of 
 the Down Survey^ conveys a clear notion of the great practical 
 difficulties of the working out in detail, within reasonable time 
 and with any approach to justice, of the allotments of forfeited 
 land. " It is difficult to imagine a work more full of perplexity 
 and uncertainty than to locate 32,000 officers, soldiers and fol- 
 lowers, with adventurers, settlers and creditors of every kind 
 and class, having different and uncertain claims on lands of 
 different and uncertain value in detached parcels scattered 
 over two-thirds of the surface of Ireland*." 
 
 The two races of English and Irish had long been gradually 
 taking the respective positions of landlord and tenant. The 
 forfeitures at this time spread this relation over nine-tenths 
 
 1 The form of these debenture bonds signs out of the rebels' houses, tene- 
 
 is illustrated by a facsimile given in ments and hereditaments in Ireland 
 
 Mr Prendergast's Gromwellian Settle- or other land, houses, tenements and 
 
 merit, which runs as follows : hereditaments there in the dispose of 
 
 "Upon composition and agreement the Commonwealth of England. Sign- 
 made with... for... arrears for service in ed and sealed at Dublin the — day of — 
 Ireland from.... There remains due 1658." 
 
 from the Commonwealth to the said... 2 Afterwards Sir William Petty, 
 
 executors, administrators or assigns the ^ 1655 — 6. Published in 1851 by 
 
 sum of... which is to be satisfied to the the Dublin Archaeological Society, 
 
 said.., executors, administrators or as- * Notes to History of Survey, p. 338. 
 
80 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. 
 
 of the country \ The most important point in the Cromwellian 
 Settlement having regard to its future bearing on the land 
 question is the position of those Irish peasantry who were not 
 transplanted with the swordsmen into Connaught. The earth- 
 tillers were kept in their holdings for several reasons ; firstly, 
 they had always been a fairly quiet and toilsome class, and 
 when freed from the influence of the disquieting element of 
 the transplanted fighting men might be expected to develop 
 into a peaceful tenantry ; secondly, there was no sufiicient 
 supply of English to take the lowest positions in the social 
 scale. It has been seen that under the change of tenures 
 effected by Sir John Davies a large proportion of the native 
 Irish became freehold owners. By the confiscations following 
 Cromwell's conquest nearly all trace of the Irish owners was 
 swept away, and the position in law of the tenants was com- 
 pletely altered. No longer considered freeholders subject to a 
 quit rent, they were in future treated merely as " commercial 
 tenants under contract or if without contracts as mere tenants 
 at wilP." There is, however, a very important fact to be con- 
 sidered, namely, that there is no doubt, despite the apparently 
 precarious nature of the tenant's position, that he was at that 
 time considered to have a vested interest in the land. There 
 exists indeed a formal recognition of some degree of tenant- 
 right, for Sir W. Petty when ofiicially surveying the country 
 in the interests of the new owners excepted from his gross 
 valuation of the confiscated lands the value of the tenant's 
 interest in their holdings'^, stating that the benefit of leases 
 and the value of the tenant's improvements upon the said land 
 is one-third — £216,000*. This appears to prove conclusively 
 that he did not consider them mere tenants at will. 
 
 When Charles the Second was restored, and sober England 
 lapsed for one solitary portion of her history into high carnival, 
 
 1 O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Review, Political Anatomy of Ireland. Also 
 1887, p. 141. The History of the Doion Survey, 
 
 2 Seebohm, " The Historical Claims 1655—6, published in 1851 by the 
 of Tena.nt-'Right,^' Nineteenth Century , Dublin Archaeological Society. 
 
 1881. 4 This valuation included the value 
 
 2 Seebohm, " The Hist. Claims of of their cabins. 
 Tenant-Eight," and Sir W. Petty's 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 81 
 
 the hearts of the conquered party in Ireland were beating high 
 with hope. Royalists who had ventured and lost all, clamoured 
 for a guerdon from Irish lands ; the transplanted landholders 
 saw themselves again in fancy installed in their homes ; and the 
 holders under the Cromwellian Settlement trembled for their 
 possessions. The final arrangement came as a terrible blow 
 to many. There were difficulties of no small degree in the 
 way of the advisers of Charles, for his father had ratified the 
 Act under which money, on the security of Irish land, was 
 advanced by the adventurers in 1642, and this the king was 
 therefore bound to support. In 1660 the Commission appointed 
 to consider the Irish claims commenced its sittings. It was 
 decided that those who were able to prove themselves innocent 
 of complicity with the original outbreak were to be reinstated 
 in their lands, those in possession being compensated by other 
 grants — the lands still unallotted under the Act of 1653 and 
 the new forfeitures from the old opponents of Charles the First 
 being available for this purpose. The Act of Settlement 
 14 & 15 Car. II. c. 2, carried out this policy, and a Court of 
 Claims tried the cases in detail \ To a very large extent the 
 Cromwellian settlers managed to retain possession of their 
 lands, yet more settlers were ousted than there was land else- 
 where to satisfy, and a second Act became necessary. This Act, 
 17 & 18 Car. II. c. 2 (1665), compelled the soldiers, adventurers, 
 and debenture holders to be content with two-thirds of the 
 land they had been entitled to under the Cromwellian settle- 
 ment, and barred all hope of restitution to the 3,000 Irish who 
 had not yet been adjudged innocent. In the vast majority of 
 cases these latter had certainly been guilty, but they were 
 naturally enraged at the loss of their possessions without a trial. 
 The result of the Commission may be stated to be that while 
 before the rebellion the Irish Catholics held some two- thirds of 
 the kingdom, more than half of these possessions were now lostl 
 
 1 It seems that nearly 7,800,000 acres 2 Hallam, Vol. iii. chap, 18, p. 33. 
 
 came before the Court of Claims. — Si- A considerable portion of land in Ire- 
 
 gerson, p. 96. See Letters of the Earl land is held by small quit rents under 
 
 of Essex as to the competition for letters patent which date from the Acts 
 
 lands. of Settlement and Explanation. 
 
 M. 6 
 
82 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENUKES [CHAP. 
 
 In reviewing the history of landed relations in Ireland up 
 to the reign of Charles the Second it must be remembered that 
 if heavy burdens had been exacted from the inferior class 
 of holders, the higher class were themselves the victims of 
 no ordinary oppression. The onerous nature of the incidents 
 of the feudal system pressed most heavily on the whole of the 
 Irish colony; repeatedly the complaint is made that heavy 
 as were the exactions levied by the irregular charges of coygne 
 and livery, they were less grievous than the exactions of 
 the king's officers. It is perhaps no wonder that the lords 
 were little less averse than their tenants to practically free 
 themselves from the feudal bond. The overthrow of the feudal 
 incidents \ and the substitution of socage tenures for knight 
 service, which the necessities of his situation enabled the lords 
 to exact from Charles the Second, was undoubtedly the downfall 
 of a system of flagrant evil. Had the improved position of 
 the landlord class led to their extending a merciful forbearance 
 to the peasant earth- tillers, half the accumulated wrongs of 
 the history of the Irish land law might never have arisen. 
 The prevalent custom, however, of looking to Irish land as a 
 source of revenue merely, divorced from all reciprocal duties 
 of just management — which led to the creation of the pestilent 
 class of middlemen, and to a system under which the lands 
 of an absentee owner''^ were let six deep — prevented any amelio- 
 ration of the position of the peasant occupier. 
 
 With the accession of James the Second rose the cause of 
 the Catholic party in Ireland. James was fully aware that 
 the Irish troubles sprang more from the distinctions of race 
 than from differences of creed ^ and had his proceedings been 
 marked by a determination quietly to enforce the existing 
 state of affairs, rather than by efforts in the interests of one 
 cla^s to overthrow a settlement sanctioned by twenty-five years' 
 possession under the solemn guarantee of Parliament, much 
 
 1 The Court of Wards and Liveries 2 "Three-fourths of the land at one 
 
 was in effect discontinued after 1645, time, always more than half, belonged 
 
 and formallyabolished by 12 Charles II. to the absentees." Field, p. 263. 
 
 c. 24, and 14 & 15 Car. II. sess. 4, ^ SeeliOrdM&c&ulay's Hist, of Eng- 
 
 c. 19 (Irish). land, Vol. i. p. 393. 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 83 
 
 bloodshed might have been avoided. Had he at the same time 
 striven to ameliorate the position of the native small holders 
 by extending to them some measure ot certainty of tenure ; 
 and Avhile extinguishing the extravagant hopes of resumption 
 cherished by the old proprietors of large domains endeavoured 
 to reconcile them with the existing settlement, it is possible that 
 no great difficulties might ever again have arisen ; for the con- 
 dition of the colony was now comparatively prosperous, as was 
 clearly shown by the fact that rents had almost doubled ^ His 
 action, however, was widely different. Tyrconnell laboured to 
 undo the work of the Acts of Settlement, and to extirpate the 
 Protestant interest. At the time when William landed in 
 England, in the Court of the Exchequer at Dublin crowded 
 with Irish applicants armed with writs of ejectment and tres- 
 pass, no Protestant title, however established, seemed safe. 
 Finally in 1688 the Catholic party, under the cloak of the cause 
 of the exiled James, again took arms, James landed in 1689, 
 and the Irish and Catholics regarded him as the one who was to 
 restore to them their inheritance. A Parliament met at Dublin ; 
 the Acts of Settlement were repealed ; and the old owners, who 
 had been ousted from land which was barren of all save the 
 good gifts of nature, were replaced on land which the industry, 
 the labour and the capital of others had made fruitful exceedingly.' 
 Attainders overwhelmed the Protestant owners ; but the cause 
 of James was but a house of cards. After the battle of the 
 Boyne the revival of the Protestant supremacy was but a 
 matter of time, and in 1691 the Treaty of Limerick was signed, 
 which proved but a feeble protection to the native race. Again 
 the tide of change rolled over the Irish lands, and the Com- 
 missioners appointed for the purpose of restoring the property 
 of the Protestants entered on their difficult task; but so com- 
 plicated were the rights involved that the Settlement took 
 some years. The large confiscations of the estates of king 
 James and his adherents offered new sources for grants '"^j which 
 
 ^ See Lord Macaulay's Hist. ofEng- given by Wakefield as amounting to 
 
 land, Vol. i. p. 393. "1,060,792 acres, which being worth 
 
 2 The forfeitures of land belonging £211,623 a year at 6 years' purchase 
 
 to the adherents of James II. are for a life and 13 years for an inherit- 
 
 6—2 
 
84 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. 
 
 it is to be regretted were often given to those who possessed 
 no claim to them save Royal favour \ and who were far from 
 being the most fitted to deal with the involved problem of 
 Irish land rights I 
 
 That the bitterness of many unhealed wounds lay between 
 the class who ruled and the class who tilled the land, was calcu- 
 lated naturally to produce oppression on the one hand and 
 hatred on the other. This was increased by the fact that 
 among the class of earth-tillers, reduced to the lowest step of 
 the social ladder, were not merely the descendants of the old 
 tribal freeman, but also the descendants of the noblest houses of 
 the chieftains; men who to the hatred of nation for nation, and 
 creed for creed, added the bitterness always felt by the superior 
 reduced to bondage to one whom he considers immeasurably 
 his inferior. The sympathies of the subject people were all 
 against the dominant class. Freebooters, the relics of the army 
 of James the Second, lived by rapine and exaction ; yet says the 
 Statute of William the Third ^ "the Popish inhabitants chose 
 rather to suffer strangers to be robbed and despoiled of their 
 goods than to apprehend the offenders, the greater part of 
 whom were people of the same country and harboured by the 
 inhabitants." With a short-sighted policy, moreover, the evil 
 effects of which were manifold, the English nation kept the 
 Irish native race enthralled to the soil. The doors which might 
 have been opened to them by the encouragement of manufac- 
 ture and trade were kept resolutely closed. Had this been 
 different, by teaching the Irish to look away from the vexed 
 subject of the land for their sustenance, the strained relations 
 
 ance amounted to £2,685,130. Out of these estates were afterwards reclaimed 
 
 these lands the estates restored to the and vested in trustees for sale for the 
 
 old proprietors under the articles of benefit of the English nation. 
 
 Limerick and Galway were valued at ^ The Commission of 1699 revealed 
 
 £724,923 and those restored by Eoyal a mass of jobbery into which it is im- 
 
 favour at £260,863. And after these possible to enter here, but the case of 
 
 deductions and several other allow- Lady Orkney alone is suflBcient to 
 
 ances, the gross value of the estates condemn the whole transaction. See 
 
 forfeited from the 13th of February, Froude, Eng. in Ireland, Vol. i. pp. 245 
 
 1688, amounted to £1,699,343." Ac- —248. 
 
 count of Ireland. ^ 7 Will. III. c. 21 (Irish), and see 
 
 1 By the Resumption Act of 1699 Froude, Vol. i. p. 262. 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 85 
 
 between the two classes of landholders might have been eased, 
 and the two races drawn together by bonds of mutual interest 
 in commercial dealings. On the contrary, fresh restrictions 
 were ever and anon placed on the development of native 
 industry. The prohibitions and duties imposed on the export 
 and manufacture of wool and woollen goods \ and then on linen; 
 the restrictions on the importation into England of cattle, and 
 the far-reaching wrong inflicted by the Merchant Navigation 
 Act, 1663^ aggravated the evils of the land system by in- 
 creasing the class of those dependent upon the soil. Moreover, 
 the provisions which prohibited Papists from sitting in Parlia- 
 ment^, and which took away from them the elective franchise, 
 prevented the position of the conquered people being ably 
 advocated, and hindered the bitter cry of their wrongs from 
 adequate utterance. It is, alas, but seldom realized how 
 immense an influence the laws regulating the social relations 
 and commercial dealings of a community have upon the ameli- 
 oration or aggravation of its land system. Where the problem 
 of a community is presented by the abject condition of its 
 lowest class, and that class is found to cling to the land with an 
 unreasoning tenacity which ends only with life itself, it may be 
 predicted with certainty that there exists, either at that time 
 or in the history of the community, some cause other than 
 mere national aspirations. Land, by the fatal policy of Eng- 
 land*, was made the vital necessity of the Celtic race. Half 
 the land hunger of the Irish peasantry has its root in the trans- 
 mitted idea that the possession of land is an essential of exist- 
 ence. The legislation which for a century deliberately shut 
 the door to the growth of Irish commerce, and which systema- 
 tically laboured to reduce to subjection the native race, bound 
 them to the land by barring all other means not only of wealth 
 but of bare subsistence. It will be seen later how this fact 
 
 1 13 & 14 Car. II. c. 18, and 10 & 11 have exterminated the Catholics by the 
 Will. III. c. 10. sword, or expell-^d them like the Moris- 
 
 2 See Field, p. 266. coes of Spain, would have been little 
 ^ 3 Will. & Mary, c. 2. more repugnant to justice and human- 
 * Hallam says, when dealing with ity, but incomparably more politic." 
 
 the Penal and Commercial Codes, "To 
 
86 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES [CHAP. 
 
 rendered the pretty paper theory of free contractual relations in 
 land dealing a source of desperate misery. How was it possible 
 for such a method to hold for a moment when a commodity of 
 which the supply was limited was hungered after by a whole 
 community with a wild desire, caused not only by national 
 predilections and present necessities, but also by an ingrained 
 sentiment, graven upon their characters by a mass of legislation 
 ' which had driven them to the soil for their very being ? 
 
 Not only the Commercial Codes but also the illiberal and 
 inhumane Penal Code tended to aggravation of the land diffi- 
 culty. Designed as it was to reduce to the lowest grade the 
 scanty remnant of those Catholics who retained recognizable 
 proprietary rights in the soil, its result was to increase the class 
 of those dependent upon the land for their sustenance. A cur- 
 sory glance at some of these provisions, which constitute such 
 a blot on the Statute Book, will illustrate this proposition. 
 Catholics were prohibited from taking a freehold or a mortgage 
 of lands, and if they succeeded to such must conform within six 
 months or forfeit^ to the next Protestant heir. Their lands 
 were gavelled^ and descended to the children equally, but sub- 
 ject to the proviso that if the eldest son conformed, the father 
 merely had an estate for life, the reversion in fee resting with 
 the son^ A Protestant heiress who married a Catholic for- 
 feited her lands to her next of kin, and a Protestant man 
 marrying a Papist became himself liable to all the disa- 
 bilities of a Catholic \ The whole weight of the law tended to 
 reduce the Catholic interest in the land to mere tenancies at 
 will. Leases save for thirty-one years or less, and then at a 
 rent of two-thirds value, were forbidden them; while should 
 the profit rent of the land be found to exceed the allowed third 
 the benefit of the lease was transferred to the Protestant who 
 
 1 See O'Connor Morris, p. 143. applied, proving that it was really con- 
 
 2 It has been well pointed out that sidered a destructive custom. 
 
 this provision is a strong confirmation =* What kind of landlord was a son 
 
 of the good intention with which the who abjured his faith for this reason 
 
 abolition of Irish Gavelkind was car- likely to be? 
 
 ried out by Sir John Davies, for here ^ 9 Will. III. c. 3 (Irish), and see for 
 
 it is restored for the express purpose further repressive legislation 2 Anue 
 
 of destroying the class to whom it was c. 3 (Irish) and 2 Anne c. 6 (Irish). 
 
v.] AND THE ERA OF PROTESTANT ASCENDENCY. 87 
 
 made the discovery. This last provision encouraged a most 
 baneful system of informers, and completely prevented the 
 proper cultivation of the soil. The enactments of Parliament, 
 moreover, were imitated in various bye-laws passed by local 
 corporations, with the result of excluding the Catholics from 
 every useful branch of trade. 
 
 It is not remarkable that, labouring under the monstrous 
 burden of the Penal and Commercial Codes, the Catholic 
 owners and the native race generally were reduced to a most 
 abject condition, and lapsed into mere occupiers, holding prac- 
 tically only tenancies at will. Nor were the native Irish and 
 the Catholics the only persons who were thus cast on the 
 land. The descendants of many of the Colonists of the 
 Cromwellian Settlement became as Irish as the natives, and 
 were involved with them in the common ruin; while the de- 
 scendants of many colonists of earlier settlements were reduced 
 to the same condition in a rather curious manner. The English 
 undertakers who received estates in the various settlements on 
 the condition of planting a certain number of English tenants 
 had frequently treated those colonists, whom they induced by 
 promises of freehold estates to go to Ireland, with great in- 
 justice. The actual lease for life or lives, or grant of an estate 
 in fee, was refused them, and they were compelled to put up 
 with mere possession and a parol agreement. This frequently 
 satisfied them, since when livery of seisin was at its height 
 possession bore many binding traits \ and the idea that it 
 involved determinate rights was long-lived; but by a statute 
 of William the Third ^ any estate that they might have 
 deemed themselves the owners of was swept away. This 
 statute enacted that after 1696 "all leases, estates, interests, 
 freeholds or terms of years, or any uncertain interest of, into 
 or out of any messuages, manors, lands, tenements or here- 
 ditaments, made and created by livery of seisin only, or by 
 
 1 In Bracton's time the law protected Seisin," F. W. Maitland, L. Q. Review ^ 
 
 possession, even if untitled and vicious, 1888. 
 
 against property; but by the time of - 7 Will. 3, sess. 1. c. 12 (Irish) and 
 
 Littleton the power of seisin was great- see Sigerson, p. 101. 
 ly diminished. "The Beatitude of 
 
88 THE SUBSTITUTION OF ENGLISH TENURES. [CHAP. V. 
 
 parol and not put in writing and signed by the parties so 
 making and creating the same or their agents, thereunto au- 
 thorized by writing, shall have the force and effect of leases 
 and estates at will only." Practically this is an extension of 
 the Statute of Frauds^ to Ireland, and mischievous as that 
 statute has sometimes proved in England, it would in the very 
 nature of things prove more so in Ireland, for an unlearned 
 tenantry would be totally unable to understand such a departure 
 from their parol customs. It has been remarked with much 
 justice that this statute "produced written leases in England, 
 but it only legalized gross general exactions in Ireland." 
 
 How complete was the subjection of the native race 
 during the hundred years that followed 1691 it is hard to 
 paint in sufficiently forcible colours: Swift, writing in 1731, 
 said, " The estates of the Papists are very few, crumbling into 
 small parcels, and daily diminishing ; their common people are 
 sunk in poverty, ignorance and cowardice, and of as little con- 
 sequence as women and children. Their nobility and gentry 
 are at least one half ruined, banished or converted. They all 
 soundly feel the smart of what they suffered in the last Irish 
 war. Some of them are already retired into foreign countries : 
 others, as I am told, intend to follow them; and the rest, I 
 believe to a man, who still possess any lands, are absolutely 
 resolved never to hazard them again for the sake of esta- 
 blishing their superstition I" As is pointed out by Lord 
 Macaulay, the native race found no champion even among 
 those English who most studiously upheld in England the 
 cause of liberty. "During the century which followed the 
 Eevolution, the inclination of an English Protestant to trample 
 on the Irishry was generally proportioned to the zeal which he 
 professed for political liberty in the abstract. If he uttered 
 any expression of compassion for the majority oppressed by the 
 minority, he might be safely set down as a bigoted Tory and a 
 High Churchman^". 
 
 ^ 29 Car. II. c. 3. An exception was ary interest, 
 made in the Statute, of leases under 3 2 Dean Swift, The Presbyterian'' s 
 
 years with a rent of two-thirds value, Plea of Merit, quoted by Macaulay, 
 
 and assignments were ordered to be in Vol. ir. p. 295, note, 
 writing unless of copyhold or custom- ^ lb. p. 296. 
 
CHAPTER VI. 
 The Land and the People. 
 
 It has been seen that the undoubted rights in the soil 
 possessed by the free tribesman were recognised by Sir John 
 Davies, but these rights had been completely swept away by 
 the various revolutionary settlements and re-settlements of the 
 land. That in a certain sense the English were justified after 
 the time of Cromwell in looking upon Ireland as conquered 
 territory, in which the possessory rights of the natives had 
 been forfeited completely by their repeated risings against the 
 English power, is undoubtedly true. Even the most ardent 
 partisans of the cause of historical tenant-right admit the force 
 of the legal objections to its existence ; but they take another 
 ground and say that the storm of war raged over the heads of 
 an unmoved peasantry, who, when the storm has rolled by, are 
 found still in their place unmindful of the change of ruler, and 
 riveted to the land. There appears no reason whatever to 
 believe this view to be correct. Those who know the Celtic 
 character can understand how, in the war of race against race, 
 the lowest earth-tiller would have felt stirred to rise against 
 the national enemy. 
 
 The statements of Sir William Petty in his Political 
 Anatomy of Ireland, it is true, seem to show the existence of 
 the earth-tillers after the Cromwellian conquest much as before ; 
 but this proves nothing. The battle over, the cause lost, the 
 earth-tiller returned to his holding because it was the only 
 place he had to go to, and because no state to which the 
 victorious enemy could reduce him could be more terrible than 
 his natural condition. It presupposes no great amount of 
 sagacity to imagine him capable of understanding that, what- 
 
90 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CHAP. 
 
 ever ruin might overtake the leaders of the lost cause, the 
 * hewers of wood and drawers of water ' were too necessary a 
 part of the social system for the conqueror, who needed their 
 services, to drive them from the land. The survey of Sir 
 William Petty recognised and thus in a sense legalised the 
 possessory rights of the earth-tillers, and to as great an extent 
 as this was done they could claim in the future to be regarded 
 as having acknowledged rights in the soil. The Acts of 
 Settlement, how^ever, again unhinged all existing rights^ and not 
 only swept away any legal claims possible on the part of the 
 lowest tenants, but also interrupted any growth of customary 
 rights. Up to the dates of the Penal and Commercial Codes the 
 wrongs of Ireland are mainly to be found in that injustice which 
 is inseparable from the *vae victis' of war. The history of the 
 gravest wrongs of the native race begins from this period. 
 
 The suppression of Irish manufactures, and the endeavours 
 to stamp out the creed and to reduce to a minimum the 
 established proprietary rights of native holders in the land, 
 resulted in throwing on the soil for support the bulk of the 
 native race in the position of mere tenants at will. Given the 
 existence of these masses of precarious holders tied to the soil, 
 and bound generation after generation to its culture, it is 
 strange that mere lapse of time did not establish customary 
 tenures, and that as the years rolled on the tenant at will did 
 not evolve into the customary holder. In English copyhold, at 
 any rate according to the legal theory'^ of the origin of copyhold 
 rights, the growth of these rights of the servile class in the 
 land can be traced from a starting point of which complete 
 slavery and unlimited personal services, combined with a mere 
 usufruct by favour, are the characteristics, to the point where 
 the services are limited specifically and absorbed in a money 
 
 1 Sir William Petty estimated the remaining two-thirds. In 1672 he 
 superficies of Ireland at 10,500,000 calculated that the possessions of the 
 Irish acres, of which 7,500,000 were Church and of the Protestants amount- 
 good land, the rest being moor, bog, ed to 5,140,000 acres. The Catholics 
 and lake. In 1641 the lands of the holding about half this quantity. Hal* 
 Church and of the Protestant owners lam. Vol. ii. p. 31)2 (note), 
 amounted to about one-third of the - See ante, p. 33. 
 good lands, the Catholics owning the 
 
VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 91 
 
 rent, and finally to the realization of freedom and determinate 
 possessory rights\ Degraded as was the position of the Irish 
 earth-tiller in the period following the accession of William the 
 Third to the throne of England, it was in no way so desperate 
 as the condition of the villeins of a Saxon manor over whom 
 at the Conquest a Norman lord came to rule. The Saxon and 
 the Norman, like the Irish and the English, present the 
 spectacle of a conquered race settled on the land of their birth, 
 but ruled by the stranger conqueror. In the former case not 
 less than in the latter, sentiments of national hatred would tend 
 to make the conqueror an oppressor, and the Norman yoke was 
 heavy exceedingly : yet slowly but surely the villein established 
 his rights in the soil, while the Irish peasant remained a pre- 
 carious holder. The villein cultivator of the lord's demesne was 
 but little in status above the mere beast of the field. Unable to 
 leave the land without the lord's permission, if he ran away or 
 was purloined he could be recovered by action ; holding his 
 land at first at the unfettered will of the lord, by the meanest 
 services, uncertain both in time and quantity ; prohibited from 
 acquiring property, and liable if he even allowed the marriage of 
 his daughter without the lord's permission to an action for 
 damages for purloining property; could a more debased con- 
 dition be possible ? Yet he reached security of tenure. The 
 express or implied manumission by the lord, the growth of the 
 customary rights in the holding, and the recognition of his title 
 by the manorial courts, built him by slow degrees a fortress 
 against unjust exactions and summary ejectments. There is no 
 trace of a similar growth of proprietary rights in the case of the 
 Irish tenant at will. 
 
 It is often urged by the advocates of tenant-right in Ireland 
 that the salvation of Irish laud would have been the wide- 
 spread application of the manorial system, and it is too frequently 
 forgotten that the rights of the precarious holders in a manor 
 cannot be established by Act of Parliament, but have their 
 origin in long user, and the recognition of customs by the 
 manorial courts. The plan has been tried in many cases 
 in Ireland as far as it is possible to create newly a system, 
 ^ See Commons and Common Fields, T. E. Scrutton, p. 7. 
 
92 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CHAP. 
 
 the very essence of which is established custom. The large 
 grants made by Henry the Second* were grants of Counties 
 Palatine carrying all the rights of the creation of manorial 
 courts; and Tipperary was also granted as a County Palatine to 
 the Earl of Ormonde by Edward the Third. Again by 16 Car. 
 I. c. 33, s. 9, confirmed by 21 & 22 Geo. III. c. 48 (Irish), every 
 person having an allotment of lands of a specified extent 
 was empowered to create a manor '^i while upon the settlement 
 of the escheated counties in Ulster, and generally in the grants 
 of land made in the reign of James the First, the creation of 
 manors was allowed, and the holding of Courts Baron authorized. 
 Many of the undertakers did create manors, the law permitting 
 them to enfeoff tenants to hold of themselves (unlike the law in 
 England) provided they did not so aliene more than a moiety of 
 their allotment. The absence of the growth of customary rights 
 among the precarious tenants must therefore be ascribed not to 
 the w^ant of the manorial system, but to the fact that even in 
 such a system the proprietary rights of the servile class can 
 only be attained by long custom, not created instantly. The 
 constant surge of change in the occupation of the land caused 
 by the compulsory removals, whether by arbitrary evictions or 
 by evictions for non-payment of rent, prevented the possibility 
 of the acquisition of such rights by long user. The curse of 
 absentee owners is responsible in a great measure for that total 
 want amongst the lowest tenants of continuity in their holdings, 
 which prevented the growth of customary rights. That such 
 rights would have arisen in the natural course of events, had 
 even the semblance of that consideration which always springs 
 from personal relationships been present, is clear. In Ulster 
 
 1 See p. 44 ante, and refer to Koll est Chauncellerie, Chequier, et conis- 
 
 of King's Council in Ireland 16 Ric.IL, sance des Plees si bien de la corone 
 
 where a petition to the king from the come auties communes, et grantont 
 
 Lord Justice and Council of Ireland auxint Chartres de Pardon." The 
 
 says "Les Franchises grantez in Ire- Chronicles and Memorials of Great 
 
 lande, que sont regale, tieles come Britain and Ireland during the Middle 
 
 Duresme et Cestre, vous oustont si bien Ages. 
 
 de les grantez profitez come de grant ^ Law of Landlord and Tenant in 
 
 partie de obeisance des persones en- Ireland. J. S. Furlong, Vol. i. introd. 
 
 fraunchies, et en chescune Fraunchise p. 15. 
 
VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 93 
 
 customary rights arose, so universal as to lead eventually to 
 their formal recognition by the Legislature. The greatest 
 wrongs inflicted over most of Ireland by the landlords upon the 
 tenants were the deeds which prevented such a continuity of 
 possession as would have fostered customary traits. 
 
 The Parliamentary persecution of Ireland acted upon the 
 land system even more disastrously by its indirect methods 
 than by its deliberate land legislation. The different Acts 
 repressive of Irish manufactures resulted in making sheep 
 breeding, in conjunction with an immense smuggling traffic in 
 wool, the most profitable use to which Irish land could be put. 
 The creation of the extensive tracts of pasturage* necessary for 
 the grazing farms entailed the eviction of great numbers of 
 small holders. The lands were often in the hands of middle- 
 men, and no trace of consideration for the position of the small 
 tenantry was shown. The absentee owners also pressed their 
 agents to obtain the utmost value from the land, and so far was 
 the grazing system carried that, despite the remonstrance of the 
 Irish Parliament, covenants restricting the breaking or plough- 
 ing of the soil, were introduced in the leases of the larger 
 tenantry ^ 
 
 The effect of this mode of dealing with the land soon 
 became apparent ; the limitation of the supply of plough-lands 
 forced rents unnaturally high, with the effect that the Irish 
 tenant, to whom land was a necessity, undertook to pay more 
 than he was able. " The tenant was ruined by his liability to a 
 charge out of all proportion to what the land could naturally 
 produce, at any rate for a continued period, and the landlord 
 became embarrassed by bankrupt tenants." How the tenant's 
 hand was forced until an unnatural rent was offered is well 
 shown by an allusion made in a remonstrance sent by the 
 Northern Protestants to the Government in 1772, and quoted 
 by Mr Justice Field^; "when the tenant's lease was ended 
 they (the landlords) published in the newspapers that such a 
 
 1 The creation of pasturage was Act was not repealed till 1823. (4 Geo. 
 
 further fostered by the fact that by IV. c. 99, s. 35). 
 
 the Tithe Agistment Act, 1735, pasture 2 gee Field, pp. 267 and 268. 
 
 land was exempted from tithe. This ^ Ibid. p. 270, note. 
 
94 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CIIAP. 
 
 parcel of land was to bo let, and that proposals in writing would 
 be received for it. They invited every covetous, envious and 
 malicious person to offer for his neighbour's possessions and 
 improvements. The tenant, knowing he must be the highest 
 bidder or turn out he knew not whither, would offer more than 
 the value. If he complained to the landlord that it was too dear, 
 the landlord answered that he knew it was so, but as it was in 
 a trading country the tenant must make up the deficiency by 
 his own industry." The diminution in the employment of 
 labour caused by the substitution of grazing for tillage inflicted 
 great misery, and we begin in the doings of the 'Houghers' in 
 Connaught to be confronted with one species of the agrarian 
 crime which has been so painfully prevalent in more recent 
 times. 
 
 The necessity of having at certain times a proportion of 
 Protestant tenants on the lands in order to insure the return to 
 Parliament of the landlord, also frequently led to the summary 
 ejectment of bodies of Catholic small holders^ and hence by 
 destroying existing tenancies prevented the acquisition of any 
 customary rights. Again in the manner in which the enclosure of 
 commons was carried on (generally with a view to increasing the 
 grazing lands of the landlord) is to be found a frequent source 
 of loss, and hence of probable ejection from his holding, to the 
 tenant. For example, in Munster the excessive rents asked b}'' 
 the landlords had been compensated by extensive grants of 
 commonage, 3^et in many cases these commons were un- 
 scrupulously enclosed and not the slightest reduction in rents 
 made^. In a greater or less degree every imposition which 
 burdened the tenant, or which aggravated the repellent feeling 
 of landlord and tenant, tended to prejudice the latter's chance 
 of security in his holding. 
 
 A prominent place among the forces of social disunion was 
 taken by the tithe question. The payment of tithes was a great 
 burden on the Irish peasant ^ and embittered the relations 
 
 1 Notice a petition presented by the he had known as many as 120 processes 
 CathoHcs in January, 1793. for tithes to be going on at the same 
 
 2 Sigerson, p. 128. time in the county of Limerick against 
 
 3 "Fitzgibbon, afterwards Earl of poor tenants." Field, p. 276. 
 Clare, stated in 1786 in the House that 
 
VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 95 
 
 inter se of owner and occupier. Not only must it have seemed 
 a hardship to the tenant to find the scanty fruits of his labour 
 trenched upon for the support of a church which he abhorred, 
 but also the fact that the great grazing estates of the large 
 owners were exempt from this imposition \ must have seemed 
 a most deliberate wrong. The tenant would keenly resent 
 the fact that in Ulster the Protestant tenantry had succeeded 
 in freeing themselves largely from this burden by the as- 
 sertion of customs of exemption with regard to certain crops, 
 for example, potatoes and flax, while he remained bound : and 
 the modern history of Wales has taught the practical im- 
 possibility of impressing on the mind of the tenant that the 
 tithe is a charge on the land and had already been considered 
 when the rent was fixed. The Irish tithes in addition were 
 almost always sold by the incumbents and passed into the 
 hands of the tithe-farmers while the 'canting' of tithes was also 
 resorted to'"*. 
 
 During the first half of the eighteenth century the Pro- 
 testant ascendency was unbroken in the higher grades of the 
 Irish social system, but as time passed the very completeness of 
 this sovereignty led to a relaxation of some of the crushing 
 burdens piled upon the Catholics. The Penal Code wa,s allowed 
 to rust, and some degree of common interests sprung up between 
 the two religions. There was a marked increase in those in- 
 fallible signs of the prosperity of a community, the making of 
 buildings, and the investment of money in the development of 
 land. Unfortunately the improvement was strictly confined 
 to the higher grades of society ; the English and Catholic 
 landlords showed signs of a rapprochement, but the landlord 
 and the tenant showed none. Even the relaxations of the 
 Commercial Code became evils to the agricultural tenant by 
 extending the amount of lands devoted to grazing. Agrarian 
 troubles reached a crisis. The Levellers, who at first had 
 limited their attempts to the forcible prevention of the en- 
 closing of common lands ^, became a serious disturbing element 
 
 1 By the Tithe Agistment Act, 1735, 3 gge Sigerson, p. 128, quoting "An 
 repealed 4 Geo. IV. c. 99, s. 35. enquiry into the causes of the outrages 
 
 2 Tico Centuries of Irish History, committed by the Levellers or White- 
 edited by Prof. Bryce, p. 65. boys," 1762. 
 
96 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [CHAP. 
 
 to the community, when, under the name of Whiteboys, they 
 perpetrated outrages which were a menace to the peace of 
 the country, and which were obviously aimed at the de- 
 struction of the whole of the existing system of landlord and 
 tenant. The rising of the Oak Boys^ in 1763 was originally 
 directed against excessive road corvees, but afterwards took, 
 like the Whiteboy rising, the form of general resistance to 
 exactions, rack rents, and other features of the oppressive land 
 system. These outbreaks, really the result of utter misery, 
 were almost wantonly misunderstood by the Government, and 
 arbitrary repressive Acts were passed. It was argued that 
 the outbreaks were concocted in the French interest, and 
 no attempt was made to investigate the true origin of the 
 risings or to remedy the social evils which gave them birth. 
 In 1771 came the Association of the "Hearts of SteeP," an 
 organization produced by a set of circumstances typical of the 
 manner in which Irish estates were managed by absentee 
 owners. When the leases on a certain estate expired, the 
 owner suddenly demanded large fines on renewal from his 
 tenants ; these not being forthcoming the lands passed into the 
 hands of a group of speculators, and a wholesale eviction, 
 whereby the tenants lost not only their homesteads but also 
 the value of their improvements, followed. When too a body 
 of Catholic tenantry was established under these speculators 
 (for in the case alluded to the ejected tenants were Protestants) 
 their position was most miserable ; for the middlemen, who had 
 paid the fine and taken up the leases as a speculation solely 
 for profit, were men "who not content with moderate interest 
 for their money, racked the tenants to a pitch beyond the 
 reach of the old tenants ^" 
 
 1 Sigerson, p. 130. their petition to the Government, par- 
 
 2 Both the "Oak Boys" and the ticular stress was laid on the exaction 
 "Hearts of Steel" were exclusively of the county cess: it would appear 
 Protestant organizations : this is a re- that the cause of their complaint in 
 markable proof that the struggle be- this case was not so much the amount 
 tween nation and nation, or creed and of the exaction as the fact that it was 
 creed, was rapidly changing to a class often misappropriated, and used by 
 war between landlord and tenant. those whom they held to be tyrants for 
 
 2 Among the many grievances ad- their private advantage. See Field, 
 vanced by the "Hearts of Steel" in p. 277. 
 
VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 97 
 
 In 1757 the Duke of Bedford had promised to abridge the 
 penal laws, and to a large extent their rigour had been lessened 
 as regards the Catholic gentry ; but the position of the Catholic 
 peasant remained unaltered, and the land law was a terrible 
 burden. Bad as was the position of the Protestant small 
 holder, that of the Catholic was worse ; they shared in common 
 the evils of a system in which the landlord was all powerful, 
 but the Catholic was burdened with additional preventives to 
 the possession of a secure interest in the land. The heredi- 
 tary sentiment which bound the native race to Ireland being 
 wanting in the case of the Protestant settlers, masses of the 
 Protestant tenantry, as had been the case earlier ^ abandoned 
 the land, which seemed under a curse, and emigrated to America. 
 At lenorth a sliofht amelioration of the case of the Catholic 
 tenants was effected by an Act of 1771 ^ by which under certain 
 stringent conditions they were allowed to undertake the re- 
 clamation of bog-land. In 1775 the American war broke out, 
 and reacted upon Irish affairs by causing a relaxation of the 
 fetters in which the country had so long been bound. A really 
 useful Act was passed in 1778^ enabling the Irish to take leases 
 for 999 years or five lives\ It is to be feared, however, that 
 the origin of this Act lay not so much in consideration for the 
 sufferings of the Catholic tenantry^ as because the landlords found 
 that unless some security of tenure was granted it was hopeless 
 to expect the tenant to improve the soil. In 1779 came the 
 repeal of the Restriction Acts, and but for the trade jealousy of 
 England the Commercial Code would have been wholly repealed. 
 This course was really necessary, for the war with America had 
 closed the chief marts for Irish goods, and more misery and 
 discontent was added to Ireland's already brimming cup. 
 
 The weakness of England was Ireland's opportunity. In 
 1782 Grattan, backed by the volunteers (which the exigencies 
 of England during her American war had compelled her to 
 allow Ireland to organize for self-defence), succeeded in gaining 
 
 ^ During the oppression of the Pro- ^ 17 & is Geo. III. c. 49 (Irish), 
 
 testant party by Tyreonnel. Ante, ^ See Sigerson, pp. 132 — 134. 
 
 p. 83. 5 This was, however, the 3'ear of the 
 
 2 11 & 12 Geo. III. c. 21 (Irish). Catholic Belief Bill. 
 
 M. 7 
 
98 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. [(^HAP. 
 
 an Independent Parliament, and obtained the repeal of Poyning's 
 Act. Legislative freedom, however, brought no benefit to the 
 radical evils of the land system, though commerce and manu- 
 facture relieved from restraint grew and increased prodigiously. 
 The fact that the peasantry were deeply imbued, and with 
 reason, with the idea that the influence of the laws was exerted 
 solely in favour of the landlords, operated largely to defeat even 
 beneficent legislation. Long leases were frequently granted 
 after the Acts of Settlement, but these passing exclusively into 
 the hands of middlemen and never direct to the tenants, only 
 aggravated the evils of their position. The law of distress also 
 was by itself enough to fix for ever in their minds the idea 
 that the landlord was an unjust taskmaster, and the law his 
 complaisant helpmeet. The remedy of distress was indeed 
 recognized by the Brehon Law to the fullest degree, in fact 
 it may be considered to have been the universal mode of 
 procedure for the recovery of any claim ; and the Senchus Mor 
 with its provisions for notice to the defendant, for the 'stay,' 
 and for a near equivalent to replevin, shows a highly elaborate 
 system. In two ways, however, it completely differed from the 
 English law of distress, (1) the remedy was entirely extra- 
 judicial, and (2) it was applicable (resembling in this the 
 Teutonic distress) to all cases and not merely to certain specified 
 classes of claims \ The feudal law of distress undoubtedly 
 developed into a powerful weapon for the landlord. When 
 there was a difference between him and the tenant, he was 
 able as feudal superior to seize the tenant's goods ; the Common 
 Law rule that the goods so seized could not be sold was supple- 
 mented by a statute giving this power, and a further Act 
 enabled him to seize growing crops ^ The tenant's rights con- 
 
 ^ The late Sir Henry Maine pointed Early Hist, of Inst., lecture x. ; see also 
 
 out that this last fact opened a wide quotation from Edmund Spenser there 
 
 field for probable injustice on the part given. 
 
 of the English settlers to the native ^ Qne of the recommendations of 
 
 Irish, for the statutes which made an the Devon Commissioners was that 
 
 unlawful distress a capital felony would this statute should be repealed and the 
 
 punish the native in many cases for costs of a distress strictly limited, 
 
 using the only method for recovery of The original theory of the feudal 
 
 a claim with which he was acquainted. distress regarded it as a means of 
 
VI.] THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 99 
 
 sisted merel}' in a resort to the dangerous action of replevin 
 which entailed his giving a bond with two responsible sureties, 
 to double the value of the goods distrained, as security that 
 he would prosecute the suit with effect and without delay. 
 It was the gradual amendment of the law in favour of the 
 tenant, by imposing the observance of many legal techni- 
 calities (with an accompanying penalty as to a trespasser 
 ab initio) on the distrainor, which led to a later stage of the 
 Irish land history when, on account of the legal difficulties in- 
 volved, the process of distress was adopted as a last resource 
 by the landlord \ 
 
 In the past century the most patent evils of the land 
 system had been the frequent changes of tenancy in the small 
 holdings and the not unfrequent blotting out of large numbers 
 of such holdings, which prevented the peasant from attaining 
 any security of tenure by the growth of customary rights. A 
 new phase of the land question was now entered upon, inse- 
 curity of tenure still marked the small Irish holdings but 
 instead of a tendency to unduly restrict their number they 
 were created with a most disastrous prodigality. The immense 
 cultivation of the potato, Raleigh's ' fatal gift,' brought the 
 most terrible attendant evils. Easy of cultivation, and re- 
 quiring but small plots of land for its production in large 
 quantities, it fostered an increase of population entirely out of 
 proportion to the land to which it looked for its exclusive 
 support. The famine of 1739 brought no lesson to the im- 
 provident peasantry, and the commercial developments of 
 1782 to 1800 did not aid the case of the small agricultural 
 holders. 
 
 The desire of the landlords for political influence^ led them 
 to increase the number of the small holdings to such an extent 
 that, considered with regard to its effect on the agricultural 
 
 compelling the performance of the ^ lb. p. 40. 
 
 feudal services, and did not contem- 2 Before the Reform Act many of 
 
 plate such a case as the recovery of the counties were absolutely subser- 
 
 rent, therefore the goods of the tenant vient to the landlord interest. Imt. of 
 
 might by the Statute of Marlbridge English Government, Homersham Cox, 
 
 be merely retained as a pledge and not p. 108. Lord Farnborough's Gonsti- 
 
 sold. Richey, Irish Land Laws, p. 40. tutional History, Vol. i. p. 298. 
 
 7—2 
 
100 
 
 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 
 
 [chap. 
 
 system, the Acts of 1771, 1778 and 1782 which enabled Catho- 
 lics to hold land, and the Act of 1793 which granted them the 
 405. franchise, must be looked upon as evils despite their mani- 
 fest equity of principle. The small holdings created for the 
 purpose of securing a weighty tenant vote were let at rents 
 exceeding their true worth, owing to the increase in the value 
 of land caused by war prices, and the small freeholder was 
 at once, upon prices regaining their normal level, involved in 
 difficulties ; whilst the landlord on his part, despite the pro- 
 visions of the Eviction Act 1816^ and the Subletting Act 1826 ^ 
 was burdened by bankrupt tenants. The following table will 
 illustrate the rapid growth of the small freeholds, caused by 
 the desire for political influence felt by the landlords, and the 
 avid eagerness of the Irish peasantry for small holdings. 
 
 Freeholds, 1795—18301 
 
 
 40s. 
 
 £20 
 
 £50 
 
 Total 
 
 1795 
 
 4,768 
 
 408 
 
 344 
 
 5,520 
 
 1796 
 
 64,752 
 
 5,109 
 
 3,195 
 
 73,056 
 
 1803 
 
 157,159 
 
 10,096 
 
 7,009 
 
 174,264 
 
 1821 
 
 184,229 
 
 15,139 
 
 11,066 
 
 210,431 
 
 1828 
 
 191,732 
 
 6,806 
 
 18,369 
 
 216,907 
 
 1830 
 
 14,246 
 
 7,639 
 
 17,819 
 
 39,704 
 
 After the abolition in 1829* of the 405. freehold suffrage, the 
 tenancies mostly took the form of tenancies from year to year ; 
 for the rise in the value of land, which had been caused by the 
 outbreak of the French war and the depreciation of the cur- 
 rency, had been followed by a subsequent depression, and the 
 landlords had realized the fact that under a lease by which a 
 certain rent was reserved they reaped no benefit from an in- 
 crease in the value of land, while a fall invariably involved them 
 in the losses of the tenant. For the same reason they sought to 
 
 1 56 Geo. III. c. 88. 
 
 2 7 Geo. IV. c. 29. 
 
 2 Taken from the statistical article 
 
 on Ireland in Encyc. Brit, by Mr T. F. 
 Henderson. 
 
 ^ 10 Geo. IV. c. 8. 
 
VI.] 
 
 THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE. 
 
 101 
 
 consolidate their interest, and large clearances were the result 
 of a desire to substitute large farms for small holdings. This is 
 alluded to as a necessary evil in the report of the Select Com- 
 mittee of the House of Commons in 1830\ Leases were, how- 
 ever, still sometimes granted from political motives until the 
 uncertainty of the tenant vote and the extension of the suffrage 
 in 1850 by 13 & 14 Vict. c. 69 to the occupiers of land of the 
 annual rating of £12 extinguished this cause for their creation. 
 
 ^ After 1838, on account of the 
 burden of the poor laws many small 
 
 holdings were abolished and large 
 farms substituted. 
 
 UNIVEE8ITY 
 
CHAPTER VII. 
 Ireland from 1800 to 1850. 
 
 Irish legislative independence failed to produce those 
 golden results which were hoped for from it, and the brief 
 period of its existence calls for little notice. Cases of indi- 
 vidual patriotism stand out against a background of general 
 corruption, and the wit and eloquence of Ireland glitter with 
 that seductive charm which they unfortunately associate with 
 no commensurate result. The advantages gained by the in- 
 creased commerce and manufacturing successes of the nation 
 were more than counterbalanced by the immense increase of 
 population which rose from 2,845,932 in 1785 to 5,356,594 in 
 1803. The failure of Ireland to govern herself was due to many 
 causes. Noticeably, the unwise policy of the leaders of the peo- 
 ple who encouraged the anti-English feeling, and the wild surge 
 of disappointed passions in a people who had expected a millen- 
 nium and were tortured perpetually with new hopes of increased 
 freedom, which vanished as soon as seen. Secret societies were 
 formed, and that worst side of the Celtic character, which would 
 attain its end whatever the means used may be, became promi- 
 nent. The lawless example of France, and the real misery of 
 the agricultural population, bore fruit. In 1798 rebellion broke 
 out, in the form of a murderous revolt organized and set on foot 
 by the 'United Irishmen.' Union with England was now un- 
 avoidable ; taught again the lesson that concession to Ireland 
 was merely regarded as weakness, England took the reins into 
 her own hands. 
 
 By whatever means the Union was carried (and the means 
 employed were far from meritorious) it was undoubtedly at 
 
CHAP. VII.] IRELAND FROM ISOO TO 1850. 103 
 
 this time the only alternative to complete separation, and the 
 Union of 1801^ was probably for Ireland, and certainly for 
 England, the best step that could have been taken. It was 
 signalized, however, by no improvement in the strained relations 
 of the land classes in Ireland, and causes were at work tending 
 to again rain havoc on the peasants. The passing of the Union 
 withdrew to England a still greater portion of the landowning 
 class, and absenteeism^ became the rule; while the expenditure 
 and extravagance of the Irish landlords was increased by their 
 being brought into contact with the wealthy landlords of England, 
 and with a society which normally lived above its resources. 
 The class of middlemen which absenteeism fostered were 
 utterly wanting in feeling for the needs of the agricultural 
 tenant, and regarded them solely iu the light of a rent-paying 
 machine; while, as has been said, the rise in prices caused by the 
 French war produced an increase in the value of the land, so 
 that leases were taken by the tenants at exorbitant rents. 
 
 The increase of population continued with terrible rapidity, 
 in 1841 it reached 8,175,124, in 1845 nearly nine millions"^, 
 and the whole nation were competitors for the land. This, as 
 has been shown, together with the cultivation of the potato, 
 which made minute subdivisions of the land possible, and the 
 readiness of the landlords to grant small holdings from political 
 motives, settled on the land a load of peasant tenants which 
 it was completely unable to support, save in a time of excep- 
 tional prosperity. The nature of the holdings thus created is 
 well described by Mr Shaw Lefevre, who says " throughout a 
 great part of the West and South of Ireland, every facility was 
 given to the letting of lands in small holdings of from half 
 an acre up to five or six acres. On taking possession the 
 
 1 Act of Union 1800, 39 & 40 Geo. Ireland, p. 265, "Magnates and others 
 III. c. 67. also, who dwell in England, or else- 
 
 2 A very curious proof of how early where out of this land, and draw the 
 the evils of absenteeism began to be profitsof their lands out of this counti-y, 
 felt in Ireland is given by the following and send nothing for the preservation 
 extract from The Black Book of Holy of their holdings, or their tenants' 
 Trinity Church, Dublin, 26 Edw, I. security, shall etc." 
 
 (1297) quoted by Sir William Betham 3 t^jekl, p. 282. 
 
 in his Constitutions of Enyland and 
 
104 Ireland from 1800 to 1850. [chap. 
 
 tenant would himself build a mud hut at little cost; a few 
 weeks of labour sufficed for preparing the land for potatoes, 
 digging the crop, and cutting turf for fuel from the common 
 bog; the rent was usually paid in labour and the spare time 
 was spent in fishing, or in work at a distance. The general 
 social condition of this class was as low as it is possible to 
 conceive. They constituted nearly half the population of 
 Ireland, and, with rare exceptions, lived in cabins with one 
 room only, which they often shared with their pigs. There 
 was no inducement to them to improve their condition, either 
 from a healthy competition with their neighbours, or from a 
 sense of security in their holdings^". 
 
 The depression of prices in 1816 and the following years 
 brought financial troubles not only upon the peasant class, but 
 also upon the landlords who had entered upon extravagant 
 modes of living, calculated upon the false basis of the apparently 
 high rent-roll of their estates; a purely fancy sum produced by 
 unlimited competitive demand and limited supply. The rents, 
 which had doubled in thirty years, melted at once on the normal 
 balance of value being reached: still such was the demand 
 for peasant holdings that, whatever might prove ultimately 
 to be the solvency of the candidates, no landlord found a 
 difficulty in letting his land even at a high rent. 
 
 The agricultural tenants being thus eager to obtain the 
 land, the nature of the tenure granted them was naturally 
 regulated by the wishes of the landlord class, and these were 
 almost universally swayed by the desire for political influence. 
 Until 1829, when the annual value was raised to ten pounds, 
 a freehold rated at 40^. was the qualification for a vote, hence 
 until the Reform Act a freehold became the general estate 
 granted; but it was a freehold of the smallest possible kind, 
 viz. an estate for life only, and it is apparent that such a tenure 
 was absolutely hostile to any chance of improvement in the 
 soil or to any agricultural development of the holdings. Indeed 
 it may be considered that the tenants were only in a technical 
 sense freeholders, the landlord's influence over them being 
 scarcely less than that exercised over the tenants from year to 
 1 Peel and O'Connell, Rt. Hon. G. Shaw Lefevre, p. 257. 
 
til] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. 105 
 
 year, as by keeping a 'hanging gale' over them he could, by 
 the threat of demanding immediate payment, prejudice their 
 position \ 
 
 Leaseholds for terms of years were then granted, but this 
 tenure became unpopular with the landlords ^ and as political 
 motives ceased to influence the lettings (for the tenantry were 
 often avowedly hostile to the landlord's political party) the 
 small holdings came to be held largely either (1) from year 
 to year or (2) at will, and after the Act of 1850* this practice 
 became almost universal. 
 
 Tenancies from year to year, which for some curious reason 
 the Irish tenants have always regarded as a species of tenancy 
 in perpetuity, dated from the reign of Henry the Eighth, when 
 Potkyn's case^ first gave them legal recognition. In several 
 ways the development of this system of letting is interesting. 
 Until the reign of George the Third it could only be founded 
 either on express agreement, or upon implication arising from 
 the acts of the parties or from the payment of rent; for the 
 doubt as to what mode of tenancy should be implied when the 
 letting did not specify it, was held to be decided on the ground 
 of the mode of letting most common at the time of the creation 
 of the tenancy. This was held to be tenancy at will until the 
 time of Lord Mansfield, and as regards tenancies created after 
 that date, from year to year^ At first these tenancies were 
 created by an express demise for one year, and then from year 
 to year as long as both parties desired, at an annual rent. 
 They can now be created in this w^ay, but when this is the 
 case can only be terminated at the end of the second year of 
 holding, or, if the tenancy has continued longer than this, then 
 by the ordinary methods for determining an estate from year to 
 year®. 
 
 ^ Peel and O'Connell, G. Shaw Le- ancy, which they regarded as unlimited 
 
 fevre, p. 104. in extent. 
 
 2 See ante, page 100. It was stated s gee ante, p. 101. 
 
 before the Bessborough Committee that ^ Year Book, 14 Hen. VIII. foL 10. 
 
 the tenantry also were averse to the ^ Timmons v. Rowlinson, 3 Burr 
 
 idea of long terms, holding that they 1603. Shore v. Porter, 3 T. R. 13. 
 were a derogation of their rights in the ^ Furlong's Landlord and Tenant, 
 
 soil and preferred a year to year ten- Vol. i. Intro, p. 35. 
 
106 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. 
 
 The most usual form of these tenancies in modern times 
 was where they were implied without the existence of a 
 written agreement from the payment of rent. This tenure was 
 always looked upon by the tenants as being practically in per- 
 petuity, and under it they Avould at least to a certain extent 
 improve the lands, which it was almost impossible to induce 
 them to do under tenures for a term of years. They considered 
 a holding for a term certain to be an invasion of their rights in 
 the soil, and on the termination of such lettings returned the 
 land 'run out.' It is evident that this tenancy from year to 
 year was capable of grave abuses ; the landlord, by serving a 
 notice to quit, could compel the tenant either to surrender his 
 holding and abandon the improvements he had made, or pay 
 an increased rent. Only too frequently this plan was adopted, 
 and it had the invariable result of causing the tenant to accept 
 the higher rent, the ultimate consequence of which was his 
 ruin and eviction. 
 
 A mistake frequently made in speaking of these tenures 
 was pointed out by the late Dr Richey\ namely, the statement 
 that the tenant had no right to sell or sublet to whom he 
 pleased. The origin of the mistake arises in the fact that the 
 tenant could pass no greater estate than rested in him, that is 
 merely the term of the year, at the end of which the tenancy, 
 unless the landlord consented to the new tenant, determined. It 
 is therefore obvious that save with the consent of the landlord 
 no very valuable estate in the land could be passed. This was 
 undoubtedly considered a wrong by the tenants who, consider- 
 ing their holdings in the light of a perpetuity, could not com- 
 prehend the apparent restraint upon alienation. 
 
 Tenancies at will, amounting in result to a holding only 
 for as long as the landlord pleased, were not as common as 
 those from year to year; for as will be seen from what has 
 been said relative to the yearly tenancies, a tenancy at will 
 could only be created in modern times by express agreement, 
 or implied where the circumstances of the case preclude the 
 possibility of a tenancy from year to year having been contem- 
 plated. 
 
 1 Irish Land Laios, p. 88. 
 
VIL] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. 107 
 
 Under the influence of a certain set of causes the history of 
 the small holdings has been traced from 1800 to 1850. It has 
 been seen that the number of these holdings increased largely, 
 and that their tenure, at first generally that of freeholds for life, 
 became changed to a system of tenancy from year to year. But 
 during this epoch many other causes were at work as well, and 
 other and most potent circumstances were widening the breach 
 between landlord and tenant, and were desolating the unhappy 
 kingdom. Protestant omnipotence had been rudely shaken; the 
 agitation of O'Connell and the efforts of the priests had roused 
 from the torpor of despair the passions of the Celtic race; 
 concessions such as the Catholic emancipation had been wrung 
 from unwilling masters, not freely given ; the money obtained 
 from rents which ground the tenant holders to the dust for the 
 most part passed out of the country to a clique of owners, alien 
 in race and religion ; while bitterness of feeling was fomented 
 by the fact that after 1838, to free themselves from the burden 
 of the poor laws, the landlords in many cases abolished the 
 small holdino^s and created laroje farms. In order to do this, 
 and in order to compel the payment of rents which were really 
 beyond the powers of the small holders, the landlords em- 
 ployed that machinery of the law which at this time could 
 always be relied on to aid their class. In 1816 an Eviction 
 Act had been passed, and gigantic " clearances " became the 
 rule. The small holders were driven in crowds from the 
 homes to which they were bound by a hundred ties of old 
 association and tradition, which they regarded as their inalien- 
 able property, and the value of which was mainly owing to 
 the improvements they had themselves made\ Such associa- 
 
 ' "It is admitted on all hands, that building or fencing is done by the 
 
 according to the general practice in tenant, and in the ordinary language 
 
 Ireland, the landlord builds neither of the country, dwelling-houses, farm 
 
 dwelling-house nor farm offices, nor buildings and even the making of 
 
 puts fences, gates, etc. into good order fences are described by the general 
 
 before he lets his land to a tenant. words 'improvements,' which is thus 
 
 The cases when a landlord does any employed to denote the necessary ad- 
 
 of these things are the exception. The juncts to a farm, without which, in 
 
 system of giving aid in these matters is England or Scotland, no tenant would 
 
 becoming more prevalent. In most be found to rent it," Report of the 
 
 cases whatever is done in the way of Devon Commissioners, p. 1122. It is 
 
108 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. 
 
 tions as the Ribbonmen are not produced without a feeling of 
 intense class hatred ; and complete alienation of thought and 
 sympathy between the dominant and the servient class pre- 
 vailed. 
 
 Just at the time when this antagonism was most marked; 
 when the peasants, ejected from their holdings in vast numbers, 
 became the movers in every species of agrarian combination; 
 when the absolute destitution that prevailed amongst the lower 
 ranks of the people drove them to complete dependence on the 
 potato for food, and made cultivation of it by every poverty- 
 stricken squatter the sole sustenance of his household ; when 
 continued bad times had dissipated any shadow of that reserve 
 fund which the improvident peasant so rarely laid by, the food 
 which was the very life of the nation, failed. 
 
 This failure, partial in 1845 and complete in 1846, brought 
 famine with fever in its train, and death dark-winged brooded 
 over the face of the land. Misery and despair seized the 
 people, and horrors unimaginable crowd the history of the 
 terrible year that turned the country into one vast grave. No 
 words can paint the scenes that were the every day history of 
 that time. The clarion had been sounded however, class pre- 
 judice, religious antagonism, national differences, were lost for 
 the while. England rose to help the dying and to fight as far 
 as lay in her power the inexorable forces of starvation and 
 disease. From the cot and from the castle the wealth of 
 England was poured in no scanty stream to succour and sustain. 
 Alas, the magnitude of the awful crisis was far beyond the 
 power of hurried organization and defective plans to cope with, 
 €ven though into the lap of the perishing nation was flung the 
 riches of a mighty kingdom. Public works on a gigantic basis 
 were schemed, but the starving people dropped dead as they 
 worked, labour and exposure being fatal ; and the plan, which 
 had developed into a mass of jobbery, was abandoned. Re- 
 notable in contrast to the above that enabled every ecclesiastical dignitary to 
 as early as the reign of William III. recover from his successor two-thirds 
 compensation for permanent improve- of the money laid out on necessary 
 ments was given to the Protestant ec- improvements. See Sigerson, pp. 108 
 clesiastics, for 10 Will. III. c. 6 (Irish) —110. 
 
VII.] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. 109 
 
 course was then had to large supplies of food rations ; but 
 despite all efforts 200,000 to 300,000 perished of famine or 
 disease. 
 
 When the ghastly picture is considered, one is filled with 
 surprise that the efforts of England — which, though they came 
 late in the day and were deficient in their modes of appli- 
 cation, yet represented a large-hearted generosity and a national 
 sympathy with distress which should have appealed strongly 
 to the Celtic character — were not the basis of a bond of union 
 between the two nations. Had a permanent understanding 
 been built up on the basis of this stupendous catastrophe one 
 would (bearing in mind the miserable history of crime and 
 bloodshed caused by the antagonism of race and creed) have 
 hesitated to call it dearly bought even at the price of so appalling 
 a sacrifice of life. Alas, the breach was widened rather than 
 bridged, the lack of gratitude shown by the Irish people further 
 prejudiced English opinion against them. 
 
 This forgetfulness of deep obligations is strange, for the 
 facts appeal strongly even to very prejudiced critics. Mr Sul- 
 livan in his New Ireland says, "Even the dark cloud of Irish 
 famine had its silver lining. If it is painful to recall the 
 disastrous errors of irresolution and panic, one can linger grate- 
 fully over memories of Samaritan philanthropy, of efficacious 
 generosity, of tenderest sympathy. The people of England 
 behaved nobly.... From every considerable town in England 
 there poured subscriptions, amounting in the aggregate to 
 hundreds of thousands of pounds \" Again speaking of the 
 resident landlords he says, " No adequate tribute has ever been 
 paid to the memory of those Irish landlords — and they were 
 men of every party and creed — who perished martyrs to duty 
 in that awful time ; who did not fly the plague-reeking work- 
 house or fever-tainted court. Their names would make a 
 goodly roll of honour'"^ " ; and he further pays a well-deserved 
 tribute to the courage and humanity displayed by many of the 
 Protestant clergy. 
 
 Events have proved nevertheless that the severance between 
 
 1 Vol. I. p. 139. 2 Vol. I. p. 133 (note). 
 
110 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. 
 
 landlord and tenant was even more complete after the famine 
 than before, and as the critical complications of the land system 
 are in the main due to the absence of sympathy between the 
 two classes, it is important to notice the reasons which caused 
 the Irish people to look on the famine as a slaughter for which 
 the English were responsible. That in a great measure this 
 was owing to the unscrupulous misrepresentation of political 
 agitators, and to the readiness of the peasant class to ascribe 
 their misfortunes to any cause rather than their own impro- 
 vidence, is true; but it was partially also the result of minor 
 concurrent errors on the part of England which, placed in the 
 scale of national animosity, outweighed all the self-sacrifice 
 and generosity displayed by her. The regulation which made 
 the surrender of land a condition precedent to poor law relief; 
 the breakdown of the poor law system, an event neither re- 
 markable nor culpable seeing that it was but newly established 
 and quite unsuited to wrestle with such an unforeseen and 
 gigantic calamity; the evictions and clearances which had 
 turned thousands from their homes ; the ' famine clearances ' 
 (rendered necessary from the landlord's point of view by the 
 fact that the destitute peasantry were unable to find means to 
 till the soil, and that rent paying was the exception) ; and the 
 opposition in England to many of the plans for free ports and 
 abolition of duties \ assumed to the Irish, seeking eagerly for 
 some blamable person on whom to lavish the bitter wrath 
 that their miseries had raised in them, the shape of crimes of 
 terrible magnitude. 
 
 The passion and prejudice of the Celt again flung itself in 
 wild fury against the dominant class. Emigration, which en- 
 tailed great hardships, followed the famine, and not less than 
 two millions of the population were scattered over the face of 
 the earth, principally in England and America. Fenianism 
 began to spread, originating amongst the Irish in America, 
 while revolt simmered constantly under the surface of Irish 
 politics at home. Twice it took head, once in the feeble and 
 
 1 In reality this opposition was then fighting the corn law battle 
 purely owing to the party principles of in England, the protectionists being 
 protection and free trade which were afraid of granting a precedent. 
 
Vn.] IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. Ill 
 
 futile revolution of 1848 and again in the risings in 1867 ; 
 while plot and intrigue against the Government went on 
 unceasingly. 
 
 Even before the famine the fall of prices and the con- 
 sequent failure of rents had involved a large number of the 
 landlords in financial difficulties. Estates were frequently 
 mortgaged up to the hilt and charged with every species of 
 incumbrance, and the expensive and complex procedure of the 
 Court of Chancery was found unsuited to meet the difficulties 
 presented by an attempted sale of estates so burdened ; while 
 it was the only means by which an incumbrancer could pro- 
 ceed. The disadvantage of the system of incumbered estates 
 in the hands of absentee and unbusinesslike owners was per- 
 sistently pressed, and the substitution of practical men, who 
 would take personal concern in the paying development of 
 the land, and whose direct interest would be involved in making 
 permanent profit from their estates, urged ; the aid of legisla- 
 ture was invoked, and an Act, 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48, known as 
 the Incumbered Estates Act, 1848, was passed. 
 
 The purpose aimed at cannot be better described than in 
 the words of Mr Gladstone, who in 1870, speaking of this Act, 
 said\ " It had a most benevolent object ; it was intended to 
 introduce capital into Ireland, to relieve impoverished pro- 
 prietors of that country from that which was to them not a 
 privilege but a burden — the possession of land which they 
 could not rightly use or manage — and to transfer it into the 
 hands of a more vigorous and opulent race of proprietors with a 
 view to the development of the riches of the soil." The means 
 employed in this Act to produce these effects are best shown 
 by a reference to the Act itself Section 2 enacted ''that 
 where any land in Ireland shall be subject to any Incumbrance 
 it shall be lawful for the owner of such land to contract (subject 
 to the approval of the Court) for the sale thereof, freed from 
 all such Incumbrances, and such sale, if approved by the Court, 
 shall be carried into effect under the provisions of this Act ; 
 and that any such owner, or any person being an incumbrancer 
 
 1 Hansard, 3rd series, cxcix. p. 344. 
 
112 IRELAND FROM 1800 TO 1850. [CHAP. 
 
 on such land in possession of the Title Deeds and writings 
 relating thereto, without having so contracted, may apply 
 to the Court for the sale of such land under the provisions 
 of this Act\" The modus operandi of the Act was that 
 on payment into Court of the purchase money (which was 
 divided amongst the parties entitled according to their claims) 
 the purchaser received a parliamentary title free from incum- 
 brances. 
 
 Large numbers of landlords whose estates were hopelessly 
 involved, and to whom the famine with its attendant failure of 
 rent and increase of taxation had brought ruin, flocked to the 
 Courts. By the end of 1858 there had been 8,300 conveyances, 
 and purchase money to the amount of twenty-three millions 
 had passed through the Court ^ ; while so satisfactory was the 
 working of the Act, that in 1858 "The Irish Landed Estate 
 Act," 21 & 22 Vict. c. 72, extended the same principle even to 
 unincumbered estates. Constant applications have been made 
 tmder these Acts, until at the present time over £52,000,000 
 has been invested in the purchase of Irish land. 
 
 The class of landlord created by the purchases has not 
 been very satisfactory. The purely business element which 
 characterised the purchase of lands from the Court as a specu- 
 lation, excluded any feeling of reciprocal obligations founded 
 on a bond of personal acquaintance as distinguished from legal 
 relations, and the 'new man' proved even more obnoxious to the 
 Irish peasant than the landlord to whose faults he was ac- 
 customed and with whose foibles he was acquainted. It is a 
 curious but undeniable trait of the Celtic character that even an 
 unjust landlord becomes in some sort hallowed by long asso- 
 ciation; while a new comer, unacquainted in all probability 
 with the curious turns of Irish character, gives mortal offence 
 and stirs up unending rancour by the doing of acts often both 
 beneficial and well meant, simply because his more businesslike 
 methods are not understood and his insistence on his rights is 
 considered a wrong. 
 
 1 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48, sec. 2. other foreign purchasers, and twenty 
 
 2 See Field, p. 285, "of this total, millions represented Irish capital in- 
 three millions came from English and vested in land." 
 
VII.] IRELAND FROM 1800 — 1850. 113 
 
 The deep acquaintance with Irish character necessary to 
 fully appreciate that while the peasants can be led to almost 
 anything, they can be driven to nothing, was not likely to be 
 found in the speculative purchaser of an estate ; nor would he 
 easily realise that in Ireland the ideas of justice and custom are 
 inextricably mingled. Moreover the landlords of large estates 
 are far more likely to deal liberally with their tenants than 
 petty proprietors, and during the first eight years' working of 
 the Incumbered Estates' Act, 3,197 estates passed into the 
 hands of 7,216 purchasers. 
 
 On the other hand the more business-like characteristics 
 of the new landlords, and the practical interest which they took 
 in the cultivation of their lands, tended to largely increase 
 the surface prosperity of Ireland ; while the more reasonable 
 system of agriculture rendered possible by the relief afforded 
 to the land by the removal of the surplus population, and 
 the thinned numbers of the destitute (for the famine had re- 
 sulted in a literal 'survival of the fittest'), operated in the 
 same direction. Wealth grew and expanded, railways were 
 increased and extended, and facilities for connecting the pro- 
 ducing districts with the centres of sale sprang up. Every- 
 where an apparent prosperity was presented which, though 
 afterwards proved to be illusionary and to have rested on no 
 firm basis, for the time being deceived even shrewd observers. 
 The Irish agrarian troubles seemed things of the past, and the 
 'Young Ireland' and Fenian risings were neither very con- 
 siderable nor attended with much important result. 
 
 The very causes, however, which were rendering the land 
 more valuable, were but increasing the stakes for which land- 
 lord and tenant were playing. If the conflicting claims of the 
 landlord's legal title and the tenant's (assumed) moral right had 
 given rise to desperate bitterness of feeling even when only an 
 acre holding and a mud hovel were at stake, naturally the 
 passions were still more excited when interests of substantial 
 value were concerned. The era too of Protestant ascendency 
 had waned. The Catholic Church was now an institution 
 of immense power. Exclusively interested in the tenant, it 
 brought to bear against the landlord class the whole influence 
 M. 8 
 
114 IRELAND FROM 1800 — 1850. [CHAP. VII. 
 
 of organization, and became the binding force of the native 
 element of disunion. The landlord grasped but more firmly 
 at his rights when he felt the sceptre slipping from him, 
 and under the smiling mask of order the two classes braced 
 themselves for a struggle to the death. 
 
i 
 
 PAKT III. 
 
 THE IRELAND OF TO-DAY. 
 
 8-2 
 
CHAPTER VIII. 
 Ulster Tenant-right and the Devon Commission. 
 
 It has been shown that amongst the small holders in Ireland 
 the system of tenure was, from various causes, almost exclusively- 
 reduced to a mere holding from year to year; and that under 
 this system (despite the irradicable impression of the Irish 
 peasantry that it amounted to a tenure in perpetuity) the 
 landlord was able to crush out the tenant's interest in the land. 
 It has been shown also that while all the improvements were the 
 work of the occupier he neither acquired a secure interest in his 
 holding, nor any right of compensation if the fruits of his labour 
 were appropriated. In addition it has been pointed out that in 
 the main part of Ireland no customary rights were acquired by 
 the precarious holders. In Ulster, however, things were different, 
 and almost from the time of the formation of the settlement in 
 the reign of James the First, the Protestant tenantry began to 
 rapidly thrive and prosper ; whilst a customary usage, so wide- 
 spread as finally to obtain the formal recognition of the 
 Legislature ^ gradually developed. 
 
 The origin and spread of this Ulster tenant-right is both 
 interesting and important in the history of Irish land law, and 
 the custom has to many persons represented a system which, 
 if extended throughout Ireland, would have solved the agra- 
 rian troubles. But as will be seen — though greatly preferable 
 to the total insecurity of tenure prevalent in other parts of the 
 country — it is in some ways unsatisfactory. 
 
 ^ See post, p. 140. 
 
118 ITLSTEH TENANT-RIGHT [CHAP. 
 
 In 1843 Sir Robert Peel promised that a Royal Commission 
 should be appointed to examine the nature of the tenure of land 
 in Ireland, and on the 20th of November in that year the Com- 
 mission accordingly issued, and was directed to five gentlemen 
 well acquainted with that country. The inquiry then conducted, 
 and known by the name of the Devon Commission, throws much 
 light on the nature of landed relations throughout Ireland, 
 and lays considerable stress on the existence and beneficial 
 working of the Ulster customs. Unfortunately no effort was 
 made to represent the tenant interest among the Commissioners 
 appointed, and the scheme was therefore at once attacked 
 as being purely in the interest of the landlord ; O'Connell 
 remarking " you might as well consult butchers about keeping 
 Lent as consult these men about the rights of farmers \" Still, 
 despite the prejudice displayed against it, a most valuable 
 amount of evidence was collected, and had any immediate 
 legislative action been taken on the strength of the report 
 presented, it seems likely that commendable reforms might 
 have been instituted and much of the after troubles of the land 
 question avoided. The report is perhaps scarcely bold enough, 
 but it bears every trace of studied impartiality. It is of course 
 impossible to deal with it at length, but an examination of the 
 most notable points shows that the Commission recognized the 
 substantial justice of many of the claims for fixity of tenure'^, 
 and the crying need for a fair remuneration to the tenant 
 for the money and labour expended by him in permanent 
 improvements. The Commissioners rightly ascribed the un- 
 deniable evils existing in the land system to the alienation of 
 sympathy between landlord and tenant, and stated that " the 
 foundation of almost all the evils by which the social condition 
 of Ireland is disturbed, is to be traced to those feelings of 
 mutual distrust, which too often separate the classes of land- 
 lord and tenant, and prevent all united exertion for the common 
 benefit^" 
 
 The Devon Commission brought into great prominence the 
 
 1 Peel and O'Connell by the Rt Hon. Devon Commission, p. 1122. 
 Shaw Lefevre, p. 234. » Ibid. p. 1166. 
 
 ' See Digest of Evidence before 
 
VIII.] AND THE DEVON COMMISSION. 119 
 
 fact that the comparative quiescence of the north of Ireland, 
 which contrasted strongly with the disturbed state of landed 
 relations throughout the rest of the country, was due to 
 the existence of the Ulster custom being generally * either 
 authorized or connived at by the landlord.' This custom of 
 tenant-right — a thing at that time absolutely without the 
 sanction of law — consisted of an assumed right on the part of 
 the tenant to sell the goodwill of his holding subject to its rent. 
 Such a custom was naturally regarded from different points of 
 view by the landlord and the tenant. This is well illustrated 
 by two definitions of tenant-right quoted by Mr Seebohm. 
 The landlord defines it thus^ ; "tenant-right is a custom under 
 which the tenant farmers in the north of Ireland — or, at all 
 events, in those districts where the custom prevails — expect 
 when they have occasion to give up their farms, that their land- 
 lords will allow them to obtain from the incoming tenant such 
 a sum as shall remunerate them for their improvements upon 
 those farms. . .and for the goodwill of the farm." From the stand- 
 point of the tenant it is defined as follows; "tenant-right 
 I consider to be the claim of the tenant and his heirs to 
 continue in undisturbed possession of the farm so long as the 
 rent is paid ; and in case of ejectment, or in the event of a 
 change of occupancy, whether at the wish of the landlord or 
 tenant, it is the sum of money which the new occupier must 
 pay to the old one for the peaceable enjoyment of his holding." 
 The Ulster custom tended to enhance the belief on the part 
 of the tenant that his interest in his holding was a perpetual 
 one, for it was stated before the Commission'^ that while the 
 price of the tenant-right frequently amounted to £10, £12, £20 
 or £25 per acre, and sometimes rose as high as forty years' 
 purchase, the price was not much affected by the tenure on 
 which the land was held, the practice extending to the sale 
 of farms held even from year to year. The right of sale existed 
 
 1 " The Land Question," F. See- Mr J. Hancock given before the Land- 
 
 bohm, Fortnightly Review, 1869, the lord and Tenant Commissioners 1844. 
 
 first definition quoted is that of ^ See Digest of Evidence before 
 
 Lord Dufferin before Mr Maguire's Devon Commission, pp. 290, 291. 
 Committee, 1864, — the second that of 
 
120 ULSTER TENANT-RIGHT [CHAP. 
 
 independent of any improvements having been made by the 
 tenant, and in practice it appeared that it was rarely exercised 
 by an improving tenant, whilst one who had deteriorated his 
 holding was not by that fact precluded from selling. The 
 custom affected more than the rights of possession and sale, 
 it restrained the legal power of the landlord to regulate the 
 rent. Its incidents are well summarised by Mr Justice Field* 
 as follows "^ : — 
 
 1. "Free sale, subject however to the landlord's right 
 (a) to reject a purchaser upon reasonable grounds, (6) to 
 be paid all arrears of rent due from the seller, (c) to limit 
 the price, that it may not encroach on the value of the 
 landlord's interest. 
 
 2. A right of continuous and undisturbed occupancy so 
 long as the rent is paid, subject however to the landlord's 
 right of terminating this occupancy by paying the tenant 
 the market value of his tenant-right. 
 
 3. The right to hold at a fair rent, lower than a competi- 
 tion or commercial rent^." 
 
 The exact origin of this tenant-right is not clearly traceable, 
 but it had its inception in the plantation of James the 
 First, arising not so much from the actual form of the grants 
 then made*, as from a certain sturdy self-assertiveness in the 
 colony imported, aided by the fact that more of the landlords 
 were resident. Evictions were less frequent in Ulster, and a 
 larger number of the small holders being Protestants they 
 were more in touch with the landlords than was the case 
 elsewhere in Ireland. Continuity of tenure by the tenants 
 
 1 A Judge of the High Court of Judi- disputed, some ascribing the creation 
 cature at Fort William, Bengal. of the custom to their laxity. At pre- 
 
 2 Landholding and the Belation of sent throughout Ireland about 584,327 
 Landlord and Tenant, p. 288. acres of agricultural land are held by 
 
 3 See post, p. 141. trustees for Charities and public com- 
 ^ At the time of the plantation of panies. An interesting table of the 
 
 JamestheFirst,muchland was allotted values given for the tenant-right in 
 
 to the London Companies and also to various holdings during the years 
 
 the Irish Society. It is not unfre- 1873 to 1880 is given by Mr Finlay 
 
 quently alleged that these Companies Dun in his Landlords and Tenants in 
 
 proved hard landlords, but it seems Ireland, pp. 130 and 131. 
 without foundation, and the view is 
 
VIII.] AND THE DEVON COMMISSION. 121 
 
 probably established by degrees a customary authority which 
 ultimately extended equally to Protestant and Catholic; for 
 when the repression of Irish manufactures drove large masses 
 of the Protestant holders to emigrate, the Catholics, who took 
 their places, assumed those rights in the soil which user had 
 attached to the Ulster holdings. 
 
 These customary rights established sufficient binding force 
 to regulate the dealings of the tenants inter se, and also the 
 relations of landlord and tenant, without the assistance of the 
 Legislature, indeed actually in spite of it ; while once established 
 they obtained a certain hold upon the minds of the landlords, 
 who in many cases became pronouncedly in their favour. At 
 first sight this is somewhat curious, since the usage trenches 
 deeply on the legal privileges of the landlord^; but on ex- 
 amination the reason of the change of sentiment is plain. 
 The landlord's claim for arrears was a first charge upon the sum 
 obtained by the outgoing tenant, and the rent reserved, if lower 
 than a competitive rent, yet possessed a greater degree of 
 certainty. The power of refusing consent to the introduction of 
 a new tenant upon reasonable grounds, also influenced the land- 
 lord in favour of the custom; as did the fact of his having a 
 voice in the regulation of the price paid for the tenant-right, 
 which enabled him to prevent the holding being taken at a cost 
 likely to cripple the new tenant, and to make him an unsatis- 
 factory substitute, unable to improve the holding or to pay rent. 
 There were, however, unsatisfactory features in the custom. 
 The interest for which the incoming tenant might have paid as 
 much as twenty years' purchase was not in reality a stable one, 
 but was legally at the will of the landlord. Even if the 
 strength of the usage granted a certain security of tenure the 
 custom did not itself attempt to define what was to be held a 
 fair rent — obviously a matter of opinion — nor did it itself provide 
 for the increase of rent natural on any advance in the value of 
 the land I These uncertainties in the custom led to a slight 
 
 1 The Devon Commissioners held ^ uj;fQ principles for the calculation 
 
 that the tenant-right was an undue of this fair rent were ever so generally 
 
 interference with the rights of the received as to become part of the cus- 
 
 landlords, see Digest, p. 290. tom. It was conceded that the land- 
 
122 tTLSTER TENANT-HIGH!* [CHAP. 
 
 amount of friction even in Ulster, though the position there 
 was removed wide as the poles from the universal bad feeling 
 and thinly veiled revolt of the rest of Ireland ; where though 
 tenant-right existed locally, bearing certain similarities to the 
 northern custom, it was very limited in its extent and uncertain 
 in its operation. A feature in the custom which developed 
 a certain soreness of feeling on the part of the tenants was 
 the fact that when the land decreased in value the loss fell 
 upon the tenant-right, which became valueless when there were 
 no purchasers, or when even the small amount realized was 
 claimed by the landlord for arrears accumulated during the bad 
 seasons. When the value of land dropped so rapidly in 1848, 
 relations were nearly as strained in parts of Ulster as in the 
 south. 
 
 In 1850 the ** Irish Tenant-right League" was founded, 
 aiming at acquiring legal recognition for a universal tenant- 
 interest resembling that which obtained in Ulster. At first 
 the Protestants of the north and the Catholics of the south 
 made common cause ; but religious differences soon separated 
 them, and the agitation did not assume any formidable pro- 
 portions. There are many reasons why the introduction of 
 the Ulster custom throughout Ireland by means of compulsory 
 legislation would not be a success \ As has been shown it is 
 not sufficiently elaborated to fit any relation of landlord and 
 tenant where at least the germ of sympathy does not exist; 
 for while favourable to the tenant in times of prosperity, his 
 apparent liability to, and the seeming exemption of the land- 
 lord from, loss when land is depreciated in value, strains their 
 relations to one another. In the case of Ulster too the 
 extraneous means of acquiring wealth, independent of the soil, 
 by manufacturing pursuits provides a more or less constant 
 supply of purchasers for the land when it comes into the 
 
 lord might raise the rent from time to tenant-right, or to absorb the profits 
 
 time, as the general progress of the due to improvements made by the 
 
 country and the condition of agricul- tenant," Field, p. 288. 
 tural profits justified, but it was i See post, p. 139, 141, as to effect 
 
 asserted he had no right to raise it to of recognition of custom by act of 
 
 such an extent as to destroy the Parliament. 
 
VIII.] AND THE DEVON COMMISSION. 123 
 
 market; while in other parts of Ireland the complete depen- 
 dence of the population upon agriculture, though increasing 
 the demand for land, restricts the possibility of there being 
 the necessary capital for its purchase in times of depression. 
 Hence the tenant-right would either become merely of nominal 
 value, or else the incoming tenant would take the holding 
 burdened by a load of debt accumulated in raising the purchase 
 money of the tenant-right, and so would be in no position 
 either to do justice to the land, or to give much likelihood of 
 being a satisfactory rent-payer \ 
 
 1 The tenant too frequently plunged And see Cobden Essay by Kt Hon. 
 into a sea of financial troubles by M. Longfield. 
 raising money on his tenant-right. 
 
CHAPTER IX. 
 Free Trade in Land. 
 
 The years following 1848 brought many social changes in 
 Ireland, but it is unquestionable that the surface prosperity of 
 the land increased in no ordinary degree. Middlemen had 
 practically disappeared, and absenteeism was greatly diminished. 
 The rise in the prices of agricultural products swelled the wealth 
 of a country where farming was almost the only widely culti- 
 vated pursuit ; and, despite the fact that the productive land 
 devoted to tillage diminished by 140,000 acres between 1855 
 and 1868 \ the bank deposits of the peasants increased to very 
 considerable sums^. A veil of apparent well-being was drawn 
 over the rents and chasms of the social system, and during 
 these years many thought the Irish question solved. It needed 
 but the touch of adversity, however, to bring out in relief all 
 the discords of the conflicting claims of owner and occupier. 
 The new landlords who had purchased under the Incumbered 
 Estates' Act^ had certainly improved the productive powers of 
 the land, but the insecurity of the tenant-interest was still an 
 unsolved problem ; nay more, the complexity of the cross claims 
 was accentuated, for the business character of their investment 
 in Irish land made the landlords not unnaturally tenacious 
 of their full powers. 
 
 In 1860* an Act was passed so calculated to re-open every 
 half-healed wound in the union of the two land classes that it 
 is almost a matter of amazement that it should have been 
 expected by many who had studied the subject, to prove 
 
 1 Field, p. 291 (Note). » 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48. See ante p. 111. 
 
 a Ibid. p. 292. ^ 2'6 & 2i Vict. c. 154. 
 
CHAP. TX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 125 
 
 the Beus ex machind of the land question. The principle 
 of the Act was simplicity itself, it was merely free trade in 
 land. That such an idea as that of placing landed relations 
 upon the same basis as mercantile transactions should have 
 commended itself to the speculative purchaser through the 
 Incumbered Estates' Court is natural enough ; he desired no- 
 thing better than that untrammelled contractual relationships 
 should be regarded as the foundation of his position ; it freed 
 him from all obligations, save those of a fair mercantile con- 
 nection, to his tenants. But that the principle should have 
 commended itself to the uninterested observer is more re- 
 markable. The vital change in the system of land ownership 
 created by this Act has been little appreciated ; yet the whole 
 feudal theory of real property crumbled into dust before it, 
 and tenure ceased to exist. By one enactment of the Legis- 
 lature the reciprocal rights of landlord and tenant^ were shifted 
 from the basis of status to that of contract. 
 
 The number of purchasers under the Incumbered Estates' 
 Act was very large; within eight years of its passing, 3,197 
 properties were sold, and bought by no less than 7,216 
 purchasers^ ; the landlord interest exerted in favour of the Act 
 of 1860 would therefore be considerable. The hold that the 
 theories of political economy had gained at this time was 
 probably the explanation of its commending itself to unin- 
 terested persons. Free trade was the key to every difficulty. 
 To place landlord and tenant on the equal platform of con- 
 tractual rights; to enable the landowner to sell or let his land as 
 he could sell or let his horses, and to make the tenant purchase 
 or hire his holding as he might a cart, was looked upon as the 
 plain solution of the whole land question. It was never 
 realized that a rule which may be obvious equity in one society 
 may work wrong in another. It is apparent that to the Irish 
 tenant, who considered that he had vested interests in the soil, 
 the contractual theory would be perfectly incomprehensible. 
 
 According to the tenant's view if A purchased the estate of 
 
 1 The very word tenant, though tions established by this Act. 
 used here, is inapplicable to the rela- 2 Qf whom 314 only were English. 
 
126 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. 
 
 B, he did so subject to all the (assumed) rights of B's tenants to 
 the continued possession of their holdings on payment of rent ; 
 but under this Act no such theory would hold for a moment. 
 A becomes owner of the estate : at the end of the current year* 
 of their tenancy, the mass of holdings are legally terminated ; 
 A feels no bond uniting him to the tenants, and though he 
 may continue their possession in their holdings it is on a 
 totally different footing. The relation established between 
 A and C (an old tenant) is in ^'s estimation simply this — 
 "1 (^) have contracted with you (C) to give you quiet posses- 
 sion of a certain holding for a payment of £ — for the period 
 of one year." Now C on the other hand imagined the relation 
 established to be a mere continuation of the practically perpetual 
 interest which he considered he had held in the soil when his 
 rent had to be paid to B, changed only in so far that the said 
 rent had now to be paid to ^. 
 
 There was, however, a more serious objection to the Act of 
 1860 than the conflicting views of landlord and tenant, an objec- 
 tion which proved destructive to the whole theory on which the 
 Act was based. When contractual relations are established if 
 the respective rights of the contracting parties are to be satis- 
 factorily settled both parties should act with freedom. The 
 binding agreement which is to limit and define their mutual 
 obligations should not be rendered unjust by the compulsion of 
 circumstance operating against one party and not against the 
 other. The demand for land was largely in advance of the 
 supply, its possession being almost an essential of existence 
 to the tenant. Devoid of capital, and unskilled in any art save 
 the rudest cultivation of the soil, the Irish small holder felt 
 himself bound to get the land at any cost. What freedom of 
 contract could under such circumstances exist between the land- 
 lord and tenant ? The rent to be rendered for the subject-matter 
 of their contract was fixed not by the consent of both parties 
 but by the obligatory acceptance by the tenant of the landlord's 
 terms. A notice to quit did not convey to the tenant that he 
 
 1 It has been explained before that almost all the holdings were from 
 year to year. 
 
IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 127 
 
 must either make a new agreement with the landlord — should 
 he think fit — upon different terms, or else take another holding 
 elsewhere ; it said, " you are without capital, there is no land to 
 be got elsewhere, you must agree to whatever your landlord 
 proposes, or you must leave a cherished home and be cast with- 
 out resource upon the world." Freedom of contract was scarcely 
 possible in such a case as this. The notice to quit was used by 
 the new landlords in a purely mercantile manner; they assumed 
 the right given them by statute to sell their goods in the best 
 market; the notice to quit produced invariably an acceptance 
 of the higher rental demanded, and they did not consider it 
 their business to look beneath the surface for causes when the 
 effect seemed so satisfactory. Having raised by such means 
 the nominal rent roll of his estate, the speculative purchaser 
 frequently sold it at the increased value suggested by its 
 nominal incoming, and the new owner ^ naturally extorted the 
 full amount of the rents on the strength of which he had 
 bought the estate. 
 
 So sweeping was the change introduced by the Landlord 
 and Tenant Law Amendment Act (Ireland) 1860^ that it 
 merits great attention I By sec. 3 it is enacted that "the 
 relation of landlord and tenant shall be deemed to be founded 
 on the express or implied contract of the parties and not upon 
 tenure or service, and a reversion shall not be necessary to such 
 relation, which shall be deemed to subsist in all cases in which 
 there shall be an agreement by one party to hold land from or 
 under another in consideration of any rent." In so short a 
 section is swept away all the law of feudal landed relations, and 
 half a dozen words suffice to extinguish the necessity of a 
 reversion which was the keystone of the system. The func- 
 tions of the law, moreover, are changed by this substitution 
 
 1 See Eichey, p. 59. and the remarkable contrast between 
 
 3 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154. the complete negation of tenant-right 
 
 * It was stated by the Bessborough in the Act of 1860 and the practical 
 
 Commission that this Act of 1860 creation, if not recognition, of it by the 
 
 produced but little effect, but an Acts of 1870 & 1881. To the influence 
 
 examination of the Act will show the of the Act of 1860 in showing vividly 
 
 complete revolution made in the the difficulties of the land problem 
 
 nature of laud holding in Ireland the later Acts are largely due. 
 
128 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. 
 
 of a basis of contract instead of status for the reciprocal rights 
 of landlord and tenant. The law is no longer employed in 
 defining the relative positions of the two classes, but merely in 
 enforcing by its sanctions the agreements made between 
 them\ Another inroad on the old established rules regulating 
 the rights and liabilities created by a transfer of land is found 
 in sections 12 and 13 ^ the first of which transfers to the 
 assignee of the landlord the benefit or liability which would 
 have accrued to the original landlord on his covenants and 
 agreement, while the latter, in similar manner, allows the 
 transfer of the benefit and liabilities of the covenants and 
 agreements of the original tenant to his assignee ^ Here the 
 contractual theory is seen in full force ; unfettered by the old 
 rules of covenants which did or did not run with the land, the 
 assignee either of landlord or tenant merely steps into the shoes 
 of one of the original parties to the contract. 
 
 In one instance an omission in the Act is remarkable. In the 
 past so great troubles had been caused by the non-recognition of 
 the right of the tenant to compensation for his permanent im- 
 provements, that it is curious that this Act, which so vastly 
 facilitated the transfer of land, did not deal fully with this 
 question. The claim of a tenant whose term is closed by the 
 voluntary action of the landlord to compensation for improve- 
 ments is even recognised by the Brehon Law. " If the land has 
 been let for hire, and no time has been specified, whatever 
 length of time he shall be upon it, whether with necessity or 
 without necessity he goes, he shall leave behind the erections. 
 If he be noticed {to quit), whether it is with or without necessity, 
 he may carry away his erections with him. If a term has been 
 specified for him, and the term has expired, he shall leave his 
 erections (behindy." It is of course plain that under the con- 
 tractual theory a tenant would have no inherent right to claim 
 
 1 Irish Land Laws, A. G. Richey, had given notice in writing to the 
 p, 8. landlord of the particulars of the 
 
 2 These sections together with sec. assignment. 
 
 14, repealed 11 Anne c. 2, s. 6. •* Ancient laws of Ireland, Vol. iv., 
 
 3 But the original tenant was not pp. 132 and 183, quoted by Richey. 
 discharged from his liability unless he 
 
IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 129 
 
 for his improvements at the termination of his contract as they 
 were vokmtary, he being only required by his agreement to 
 leave the land as he got it. It is to be regretted, therefore, 
 that an attempt was not made to set the vexed subject at rest 
 by specific enactment. The absence of any provision for this 
 purpose is the more noticeable as the law of removable fix- 
 tures^ received an important extension by the Act of 1860, by 
 which not only were trade and agricultural fixtures allowed to 
 be taken by the tenant (as under the Act of 1851'^), when 
 erected with consent and removed during the tenancy, but in 
 addition permission was given to remove them after the termi- 
 nation of the holding, and although they had been erected 
 without leave. This privilege was given by section 17, which 
 allowed " personal chattels, engines, and machinery, and build- 
 ings accessorial thereto, erected and affixed to the freehold by 
 the tenant at his sole expense, for any purposes of trade, 
 manufacture, or agriculture, or for ornament, or for the do- 
 mestic convenience of the tenant in his occupation of the 
 demised premises, and so attached to the freehold that they 
 can be removed without substantial damage to the freehold or 
 to the fixture itself" to be removed, provided that they had not 
 been erected under any obligation or contrary to any agreement. 
 Such removal to be effected by the tenant, or his executors or 
 administrators either (1) during the tenancy, or (2) within two 
 calendar months after its determination^ (when the tenancy 
 determines by some uncertain event, and without the act or 
 default of the tenant). This provision certainly bettered the 
 position of the tenant as regards movable fixtures, but no effort 
 was made to deal with the question of permanent improvements. 
 The dwelling, such as it was, on the holding had almost always 
 been erected either by the tenant or some ancestor of his, but 
 no compensation could be obtained for it ; and the fact that in 
 general all the permanent improvements were, unlike the 
 
 ^ Dr Richey pointed out that much Roman law. SeeBracton,l.l,c. 1, s. 4, 
 
 of the rigid and inequitable character and Richey, p. 45. 
 
 of the English law on this' subject was ^ 14 & 15 Vict. c. 25, s. 3. 
 
 caused by the incomplete manner in ^ Unless it is otherwise provided by 
 
 which Bracton adopted the rules of the the contract of tenancy. 
 
 M. 9 
 
130 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. 
 
 English custom, provided by the tenant, made a rule which 
 worked fairly in England, burdensome in Ireland. 
 
 Before leaving this subject it should be noticed that by 
 another Act of 1860 called the Tenure and Improvement of 
 Land (Ireland) Act^ a hesitating attempt had been made to 
 deal with the question. The third part of this Act, which 
 treats of improvements made by agricultural tenants in 
 their holdings, provides for their compensation for those of a 
 certain class (such as reclaiming land or erecting farm build- 
 ings) by an annuity charged on the lands in which they have 
 been made^ the labour of the tenant to be reckoned in the 
 compensation I The right of compensation thus given, how- 
 ever, was only exercisable when the improvements had been 
 made with the consent of the landlord*, and when they could 
 not have been exacted by the owner in pursuance of any con- 
 tract or custom ^ The Act, though doubtless a step in the 
 right direction, did not touch the heart of the difficulty, as it 
 merely affected prospective improvements®. 
 
 Returning to the consideration of 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, it 
 is plain, that being based on the contractual theory, it would 
 differ in its way of viewing the subject-matter of the contract 
 from the English Common Law rule. Accordingly section 40 
 enacted that if any dwelling-house or other building constituting 
 the substantial matter of the demise, was held by the tenant 
 without an express covenant by him to repair, and was 
 destroyed, became ruinous and uninhabitable, or incapable of 
 beneficial occupation or enjoyment without fault of the tenant, 
 he had a right to determine the tenancy by surrender. The 
 English Common Law rule in such a case, despite the destruc- 
 tion of the subject of the lease, would have held the tenant 
 liable for the rent during the term. 
 
 1 23 & 24 Vict. c. 153. interfere with any established customs 
 
 2 Ibid. sec. 36, and any other lands as to compensation &c., see sec. 62. 
 lying adjacent to such, and held of ^ A defence of the limited character 
 the same owner under the same de- of this measure, and a good sketch of 
 mise. its general character, will be found in 
 
 * Ibid. sec. 44. the speech made by Mr Cardwell when 
 
 4 Ibid. sec. 39 and 40. introducing the Bill. See Hansard's 
 
 ^ Sec. 36. This Act did not seek to 3rd series, vol. clvii. p. 1553 — 1566. 
 
IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 131 
 
 It has been seen ^ that the process of distress as a means of 
 obtaining rent had declined. The Act of 1860 of course swept 
 away the whole theory on which the right of feudal distress 
 was built up, namely, the entry of the lord to compel per- 
 formance of the feudal services. It did not, however, abolish 
 this remedy for non-payment, but by section 51^ limited its 
 action to the recovery of one year's rent. The effect of 
 this section was to throw into more than usual prominence 
 the remedy of ejectment, which had for some time been 
 gradually more and more resorted to by the landlords. When 
 the much-abused right of ejectment is first met with in the 
 history of Irish land law its exercise was limited to cases 
 where there was (1) a lease, and (2) such lease contained a 
 proviso for re-entry. In 1781^ the power was extended to those 
 cases in which there was some lease, minute, or contract in writ- 
 ing, provided a whole year's rent or more was in arrear, though 
 there was no actual clause of re-entry. An Act of the present 
 reign* further extended the right to bring an ejectment to the 
 case of tenancies where no written agreement existed, provided 
 the annual rent of the holding was under £50 and a year's rent 
 in arrear. Finally, the Act of 1860^ allowed ejectments when 
 a year's rent was in arrear® although the tenancy was only 
 implied without a written agreement, and whatever the annual 
 rent: while all the cumbrous legal restrictions as to who had a 
 right to take proceedings against the tenant, which had sprung 
 
 1 Ante, page 99. Bills (Ireland) Act. 
 
 2 "From and after the commence- ^ 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, sec. 52. 
 ment of this Act it shall not be lawful ^ When rent was less than £100, 
 for any landlord, or anyone on his proceedings might be taken in County 
 behalf, to take or seize any distress for Court, see sec. 52 (23 & 24 Vict. c. 
 rent which became due more than one 154), and Richey p. 54. Two other 
 year before the making of such dis- Acts bearing on ejectment are, one 
 tress." 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, sec. 51. passed in the reign of Anne, and the 
 
 3 By 5 Geo. II. c. 4 s. 1 (Irish), and Eviction Act, 1816 (56 Geo. III. c. 88), 
 again (in 1751) by 25 Geo. 11. c. 18, providing the remedy by civil bill 
 sec. 2 (Irish), which extended the process — a very important change in 
 power to cases where there was an the law, as it greatly simplified and 
 article, minute, or contract in writing cheapened the proceedings. It must 
 without either (1) an actual demise, be remembered that this Act was passed 
 or (2) a clause of re-entry. when the power of the landlords was 
 
 4 14 & 15 Vict. c. 57, sec. 73, Civil at its height. See ante, p. 106. 
 
 9—2 
 
132 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. 
 
 up from the rules of the right to rent running with the rever- 
 sion, were abolished S section 53 enacting that, "in any eject- 
 ment under this Act it shall not be necessary to allege or prove 
 the making of any demand or re-entry, or the existence of any 
 clause or condition of re-entry in the lease or other contract, or 
 of any legal reversion expectant on the determination of the 
 same, and subsisting in the landlord, provided a tenancy be- 
 tween the parties shall appear to exist, whether by original 
 contract, or by lawful assignment, devise, bequest, or act and 
 operation of law^" 
 
 The advocates of free trade believed that in 1860 an ab- 
 solutely fair land system had been established in Ireland; but 
 the Act, though theoretically perfectly just, being founded on 
 pure contract, was unsuited to the state of society to which it 
 was applied. From the very nature of the social system in 
 Ireland free contract could not exist, and after a short time, 
 despite the surface prosperity of the country, signs of disturb- 
 ance began to appear. Notices to quit began to be largely 
 served on the tenants, and where they escaped eviction it was 
 only by consenting to a higher rate of rent. A large number 
 of evictions of small holders took place in order to enable the 
 landlords to consolidate their estates into larger farms, and 
 between 1861 and 1880 there was a decline of no less than 
 809,312 in the number of acres under crops, amounting to more 
 than one-seventh of the total acreage under tillage in 18611 
 The notices to quit, even where no extreme measures were 
 taken, produced an unfortunate result; they marked to the 
 mind of the tenant the uncertainty of his holding, and so were 
 a perpetual cause at once of alarm and anger^ An increase 
 in the tenant agitations began to show, and, although it was 
 not openly admitted, those in authority began to perceive that 
 
 1 See The Irish Land Laws, A. G. ^ In the majority of cases, however, 
 Richey, pp. 41 — 44. the relations of landlord and tenant 
 
 2 See post, p. 180, as to changes in were not substantially altered. The 
 the law of eviction under Act of 1887. worst effects of the Act lay in the way 
 
 3 These figures are important, as in in which it unsettled all existing ar- 
 Ireland there is always a direct rela- rangements and thus aggravated the 
 tion between the enlargement of farms class feeling in the country. 
 
 and the increase of pasture lauds. 
 
IX.] FREE TRADE IN LAND. 13B 
 
 the Act of 1860 had been a failure, indeed had gone further 
 than that, and proved a new disturbing element. 
 
 The principle of the Act was of course just; pure contractual 
 rights with regard to a commodity must of necessity be fair if 
 both parties act freely. In the case of Irish land, however, 
 not only was freedom of contract absent, but also, while the 
 Act of 1860 adopted the theory that the landlord as absolute 
 owner offered for sale or hire a commodity in which the occu- 
 pier had no vested interest, the tenant held that the land was 
 at least in part his property, and believed in the existence of 
 such interest on the ground (1) of his improvements, and 
 (2) of the assumed practical perpetuity of his tenure. It 
 is evident that here a system of contract, suitable only to 
 an advanced and equably constituted society, and even then 
 suitable only to dealings in a commodity which is amenable to 
 the fair laws of demand and supply, was planted upon a com- 
 munity the social organization of which combined every element 
 of disorder and disintegration. Moreover, the system of contract 
 applied was one of strict mercantile relations, and untempered 
 by concurrent equities. The late Dr Richey, who instituted a 
 comparison at some length between the contractual theory 
 applied to the Irish land law and the theories of the French 
 civilians, as shown chiefly by Pothier's " Traite du Contrat de 
 Bail a Rente" and the French Code, showed very clearly how 
 the mercantile aspect of contract adopted by the Act of 1860 
 affected the relation of landlord and tenant. Dealing with the 
 manner in which the Civil Law treats the relation of landlord 
 and tenant, which it also bases upon the theory that tenancy is a 
 species of hiring, he pointed out that the difference noticeable 
 between it and the English law was caused by the divergent 
 views which the Roman and English lawyers held as to the origi- 
 nal nature of the contract itself, namely: — "(1) The former con- 
 sidered a letting of land for a term to be a quasi-sale, with an 
 equitable warranty that the land was worth the annual rent ; 
 the latter that it was a mercantile transaction subject to the rule 
 of * caveat emptor' (2) The former considered the rent as the 
 owner's share in the proceeds of the farm, and therefore gave to 
 the landlord the right of hypothec, and compelled him to share 
 
134 FREE TRADE IN LAND. [CHAP. IX. 
 
 in the loss occasioned by a deficient harvest ; the latter held the 
 rent as something collateral to the letting — cotemporary but not 
 conditional : the tenant made his bargain, and, as in every other 
 mercantile transaction, ran the chance of gain or loss. (3) The 
 former considered the several agreements of the tenant, whether 
 expressed or implied, as conditions precedent of his possession, 
 and held, therefore, that the landlord could bring his action to 
 re-enter upon the breach of any agreement, expressed or 
 implied ; the latter, considering all such agreements (except 
 that for the payment of rent) as collateral, gave the landlord no 
 right to re-enter, and left him to his personal action for damages 
 in all except the one excepted case\" 
 
 That the basis of mercantile contract was unsuited to 
 the case of the Irish land system is clear, but when the fact 
 was at length realized it was found necessary to proceed with 
 the utmost caution with regard to remedial measures. It might 
 be obvious to those who looked beneath the surface that the 
 creation of pure contractual relations, unfettered by equitable 
 obligations, had been a grave error, but enormous interests 
 were concerned under the change which had been adopted. 
 The purchasers under the Incumbered Estates' Act 1848, and 
 the Landed Estates' Act 1858, had always expected freedom 
 of transfer to be attached to their purchases ; the Act of 1860 
 seemed to them the essence of justice, and it was impossible to 
 blink the fact that they had invested their money on the 
 strength of a State guarantee. Again, had it been openly de- 
 clared that the principle of the Act of 1860 was wrong, the 
 chamjoions of free trade would at once have cried down so 
 heterodox a notion ; for though it was clear that the Act was 
 not working well, it was far from being recognized by the 
 majority of people that rules of abstract fairness may operate 
 oppressively in particular circumstances. When the need for 
 new legislation therefore became imperative, the framers of the 
 Act of 1870 approached the subject with great caution. 
 
 ^ The Irish Land Laivs, pp. 55, 56. 
 
CHAPTER X. 
 
 The Act of 1870. 
 
 The Act of 1860 failed, and agrarian outrages followed 
 the feeling of insecurity of tenure which had been fostered. 
 The general situation also was but little affected by the dis- 
 establishment and disendowment of the Irish Church by 32 & 
 33 Vict. c. 42, though it is impossible to pass over this Act, as 
 in one very important feature it proved efficacious in dealing 
 with the land. Its provisions as to sales by the Church Com- 
 missioners \ unlike the clauses of the Acts of 1870 and 1881 
 dealing with purchase, proved largely successfuP. This was the 
 more remarkable, since although the amount which might be 
 advanced by the Commissioners — or rather might be credited 
 by them to the purchaser on mortgage — exceeded that which 
 the Land Commissioners were empowered by the Act of 1870 
 to advance, still the rate of interest to be charged (4 per cent.) 
 was practically higher I 
 
 In 1870 it was universally admitted that further legis- 
 lation was a necessity ; and on the 15th of February Mr 
 Gladstone moved for leave to bring in a Bill to amend the 
 
 1 Occupying tenants were protected missioners were transferred in 1881 to 
 
 by a right of pre-emption being given the Irish Land Commission, 
 
 to the tenant. See sec. 34, sub-s. (1) ^ The full amount of purchase- 
 
 and (5) : money being £1,674,000. The com- 
 
 " The ordinary tenants of the Church parative number of purchasers under 
 
 numbered 8432, and of these up to this Act and under the Acts of 1870, 
 
 November 1st, 1880, 6057 had become 1881, and 1885 will be given when 
 
 owners of their holdings at an average dealing with Lord Ashbourne's Act. 
 
 price of 22| years' purchase." Tico See post, p. 176. 
 
 Centuries of Irish History, article by ^ See post, p. 153, note, and Keport 
 
 G. Macdonell. The powers of the Com- of Bessborough Commission, sec. 87. 
 
136 THE ACT OF 18*70. [CHAP. 
 
 law relating to the occupation and ownership of land in 
 Ireland as regarded agricultural* or pastoral holdings. He 
 admitted that it was but a tardy measure ; that, following as it 
 did in many ways the lines suggested by the "Report of the 
 Devon Commission, its efficacy would have been probably 
 greater, and its action certainly more beneficial, had it been 
 introduced some twenty years before ^ ; and then in a speech of 
 much power urged the acceptance of a Bill drawn upon similar 
 lines to, but in bolder fashion than, the Commissioners' report^. 
 The objects aimed at were threefold, (1) to give some security 
 of tenure to the tenant by making it a matter of expense and 
 trouble for the landlord to exact his full legal rights; (2) to 
 settle the question of improvements by acknowledging the 
 tenant's claim to compensation ; and (3) to facilitate the estab- 
 lishment of peasant owners by means of certain provisions for 
 purchase known as the ' Bright Clauses.' 
 
 It is apparent at once that the legislation of this Act is 
 in a manner retrograde, for by the Act of 1860 absolute free 
 trade in land had been established, while the restrictions now 
 suggested were a limitation of the right of free contract, and 
 amounted to a creation on the part of the Legislature of a tenant- 
 
 1 The provisions for compensation of pasture lands as a source of loss to 
 did not touch demesne lands, holdings the lower classes he said, " Between 
 in virtue of being a hired labourer, 1860 and 1868 the pasturage of Ireland 
 lettings in conacre, or holdings stated has increased by about 560,0C0 acres, 
 in writing to be for a temporary pur- and the tillage of Ireland has decreased 
 pose, or cottage allotments not exceed- during that period about 400,000 acres, 
 ing a quarter of an acre (33 & 34 Vict. We are given to understand that, inas- 
 c. 46, sec. 15), and the Act only ap- much as meadow land is reckoned under 
 plied to holdings agricultural or pas- land in tillage, and has considerably 
 toral (sec. 71). increased, the real decrease of tillage 
 
 2 See Hansard, 3rd series, vol. cxcix. land is greater still." Again, dealing 
 p. 334. "Had these recommendations with the Poor Law statistics he stated 
 (i. e. those of the Devon Commis- that down to 1860 there had been a 
 sioners) been acted upon at the time, decrease in the pressure on the poor 
 it is probable that at this moment no rates, and "in that year the number 
 Irish land question would be before of persons seeking relief, who in 1849 
 the House for discussion." — Mr Glad- might have been counted, so to speak, 
 stone. by millions, was 170,000 ; but in 1868 
 
 ' Various figures were quoted by Mr the number had increased to 289,000." 
 Gladstone to show the need of further See Hansard, 3rd series, vol. cxcix, pp. 
 legislation. Alluding to the increase 341, 342. 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 137 
 
 interest in the land. The claims of the tenants are, it is 
 true, never definitely stated throughout the Act, nor indeed 
 would it have been easily possible for the Government to fully 
 state them. The English belief in the absolute character of 
 freehold ownership had never permitted an open acknowledge- 
 ment of a right, on the part of the Irish tenant from year to 
 year, to any possessory interest in his holding save the yearly 
 tenancy. While in addition since 1860 the absolute property 
 in the land, subject only to existing tenancies, had been recog- 
 nized as residing in the landlords. 
 
 The purchasers in the Incumbered Estates' Court of lands 
 held by tenants from year to year had been formally released 
 by the Act of 1860 from any obligation to their tenantry (after 
 the termination of the year current at the time of their pur- 
 chase), other than resulted from a contractual letting and 
 hiring. Neverthless, although it was effected merely in a nega- 
 tive manner, further rights of the tenants in the soil were clearly 
 recognized in 1870. The principle of the Act, by which security 
 of tenure was intended to be conferred, was that of making the 
 landlord pay a compensation for disturbance to the tenant 
 against whom he thought fit to exercise his undeniable legal 
 right of eviction. Since, therefore, the landlord was unable to 
 exercise his rights without compensating the tenant, it is 
 evident that the latter practically acquired an interest in the 
 land equal in value to the amount of such compensation *. The 
 tenant in fact had his rights increased to the same extent that 
 the landlord's powers were diminished. 
 
 The right of the tenant to compensation for disturbance, 
 however, did not exist if he held for a term certain exceed- 
 ing 31 years ; and ejectments for non-payment of rent, or for 
 breach of any conditions against assignment, subletting, bank- 
 ruptcy, or insolvency were not deemed disturbances within the 
 meaning of the Act^. The cause of the 31 years' limit was an 
 endeavour to stimulate the granting of leases for this length of 
 
 ^ Dr Eiohey well pointed out that was to make eviction a privilege of the 
 
 whereas it was urged that this provi- wealthy. Irish Land Laivs, p. 64. 
 
 sion merely compelled bad landlords ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, s. 9. 
 to act like good ones, its real effect 
 
138 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 time; and the compensation allowed for disturbance in other 
 cases was based on the theory that it was the voluntary act of 
 the landlord, for which damages were due to the tenant, who 
 had not by his conduct conduced to such termination. Now, 
 granting for the moment that such a compensation was equit- 
 able in the case of tenants from year to year, it is hard to see 
 upon what possible grounds it could be supported in the case 
 of a tenancy for a term certain less than 31 years which deter- 
 mined by effluxion of time. It cannot be urged that this is in 
 any sense determination by the act of the landlord, and why 
 then should he be liable to compensate the tenant ? 
 
 As a general fault in the whole Act it must be urged that 
 its intricacy was eminently unsuited to grapple successfully 
 with a popular evil ; its subtlety rendering it unintelligible to 
 the greater portion of the class who were intended to benefit 
 by it, and the necessary invocation of a court of justice before 
 its benefits could be received both conflicting with the pre- 
 judices of the tenants, and causing expense to bar some claims. 
 There are other and more serious objections, however, which 
 it is well to glance at before the Act is examined in detail. 
 Chief amongst these stands the fact that it did not openly 
 touch the root of the peasants' grievance, money for his im- 
 provements doubtless seemed to him a boon, and compensation 
 for disturbance was good in his eyes, but it was for neither of 
 these things that he was striving ; what he desired was to be 
 able always to stay in his holding. Compensation was a plea- 
 sant idea certainly, but then it was only gained when all he 
 desired was lost, namely, when he was forced from his home. 
 Moreover, when he had the money it was wonderfully useless 
 to him ; for as was pointed out by the late Dr Eichey^ he knew 
 but two uses for it, either he must stock a farm (and the 
 number of farms was limited while the demand was excessive), 
 or he must place it in a bank on deposit receipt. Again the 
 compensation, the payment of which was to deter the landlord 
 from an arbitrary exercise of his powers, was frequently ad- 
 vanced by the incoming tenant^, necessity driving the tenants 
 
 1 p. 94. 2 Bicliey, p. 96. 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. ISO 
 
 to overwhelm one another in their frantic struggles to obtain 
 the possession of land. Further, the idea that leases for 31 years 
 would prove to be objects of desire to the tenants was not 
 justified in the event; and for this there were two principal 
 reasons : (1) the tenant from year to year regarded his holding 
 as a species of perpetuity* (and the effect of the Act of 1870 was 
 certainly to strengthen him in this impression) therefore he 
 regarded a lease for a term certain as constituting a waiver by 
 him of his rights in the soil and an unjust limitation of them : 
 (2) on the termination of a tenancy for more than 31 years no 
 claim could be made by the tenant for compensation for dis- 
 turbance, whereas such a right was given by the Act of 1870 in 
 the case of a yearly tenancy if determined by the act of the 
 landlord. 
 
 In addition to these faults in the Act it should be noticed 
 that it contained no provision regulating in any way the rate 
 of fair rent, and even when it recognised the existence of, 
 and for the first time gave the formal sanction of the Legislature 
 to the Ulster custom, it took no steps to remedy its weak point 
 of uncertainty as to what constituted a fair rent. The result of 
 the Act was in no way what had been so confidently hoped and 
 expected ; its general tendency indeed proved merely to be to 
 increase the amount of rent asked for the peasant holdings ^ 
 Nevertheless, though it proved abortive, as far as the final solu- 
 tion of the Irish land troubles were concerned, it is a most 
 ingenious fabric, and while an examination in detail brings out 
 many unexpected flaws in its construction, it will always remain 
 a most important landmark in the history of Irish law. It is a 
 remarkable example of the dexterous handling which Mr Glad- 
 stone so invariably applies to his legislative creations. Unfor- 
 tunately it proved rather the fruitful mother of other troubles 
 than the final settlement of the question dealt with. 
 
 The Act of 1870^ after having been vigorously opposed in 
 
 1 " It is not the right of the rent- Committee, 
 
 receiver, but the right of the cultiva- ^ 33 ^jr 34 yjct^ q 45^ entitled " An 
 
 tor, with whom the idea of property is Act to amend the law relating to the 
 
 connected in the Irish mind." England occupation and ownership of land in 
 
 and Ireland, J. S. Mill. Ireland." 
 
 ^ See § 19 Eeport of Bessborough 
 
140 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 Committee in both Houses of Parliament, became law on the 
 1st of August of that year^ and has been rightly described as 
 one of the most remarkable and original pieces of legislation in 
 the Statute Book. It is divided into five parts, dealing respec- 
 tively with (1) the law of compensation to tenants^ (2) the 
 sale of land to tenants ^ (3) advances by, and powers of, the 
 Board of Works*, (4) and (5) supplemental and miscellaneous 
 provisions^. Taking the most important clauses in detail, the 
 first section of the Act deals with the question of the Ulster 
 tenant-right. No alteration or limitation is suggested, it is 
 simply enacted that the custom shall receive the sanction of law, 
 and be capable of regular legal enforcement when proved to 
 exist. It has already been pointed out® that this Ulster custom, 
 though widely preferable to entire insecurity of tenure, was 
 deficient through its lack of sufficiently defining incidents of 
 the custom, such as fair rent, which were nevertheless essential 
 to its existence. The recognition by Legislature of the custom 
 enhanced these weak points. The usual plan of employing 
 local valuators to estimate the worth of the holding for the pur- 
 pose of fixing the fair rent, when a readjustment was necessary, 
 was unsuitable to a legalized system, and the action of the 
 Courts failed to uphold the most useful feature of the usage, 
 viz. continuity of tenure. In short, the action of the Courts 
 when applied to the Ulster customs deprived them at once of 
 the flexibility to circumstance which was their chief boon. 
 
 The Ulster customs differed entirely from * customs of the 
 country ' in the sense in which it is usual to employ the words 
 as indicating a usage which must have been deemed to have 
 been in the contemplation of both parties when they made 
 their contract, and which hence can rightly be held an 
 implied term thereof. As was pointed out by the late Dr 
 Richey, such a custom as that by which a tenant was entitled 
 to a way-going crop, etc., is one which a landlord, when creating 
 a yearly tenancy, may be held to have contemplated; "but a 
 
 1 About a fortnight after the break- ^ Sees. 42 to 56. 
 
 ing out of the Franco-German war. ^ Pt. 4, sees. 57 to 64 ; pt. 5, sees, 
 
 2 Sees. 1 to 31. 65 to 73. 
 
 3 Sees. 32 to 41. p Ante, p. 121, 122. 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 141 
 
 custom, such as that of Ulster, to pay to the tenant the value of 
 his occupancy upon the legal determination of his tenancy, was 
 oneTcontradictory to the nature of the estate created, and excluded 
 by the terms of the contract itself" ^ It was therefore unjust to 
 have expected the formal recognition of the custom from the 
 Irish Courts before 1870, and its working in the form perforce 
 assumed under the Act, both deprived it of many of its in- 
 herent advantages, and also showed that legal forms did not 
 suit the usage. What was really required by the tenant under 
 the Ulster custom, who applied to the Court for help on account 
 of receiving from his landlord a notice to pay higher rent or quit 
 his holding, was not a judgment against the landlord for the 
 amount of his tenant-right, but a decree for the specific per- 
 formance of the customary compact of continued holding at a 
 fair rent*^. The Court, however, did not deal with the settlement 
 of fair rents, and the tenant's demand took the form of a claim 
 for compensation', with the result that neither landlord nor 
 tenant in all probability got what they required. The landlord 
 was first compelled to pay a considerable sum, and then had the 
 land thrown upon his hands, when all he. desired was to raise 
 the rent of the holding, possibly on account of an increase in 
 the value of the land ; and the tenant was presented with a 
 sum of money which he did not want, and for which he had little 
 use, while he was deprived of the holding to which he was 
 so deeply attached. Nor did the Act prevent the raising of 
 rent, for if the landlord, when the Cenant-right was in the 
 market, stated that in future the rent would be increased, this 
 did not usually deter the purchaser, and the loss of value in the 
 tenant-right fell upon the outgoing tenant who received a less 
 sum for the goodwill of his holding*. 
 
 The exact position taken by the Act of 1870 with regard 
 to the Ulster customs was not in any way to render them obli- 
 gatory on the tenant should he choose to waive them and claim 
 under the general rights given, but merely to offer a legal 
 
 1 Irish Land Laws, p. 102. Dr ^ g^e Eeport of Bessborough Com- 
 
 Kichey refers in support of this view mittee, 17, 18. 
 
 to the exhaustive judgment in Ramsden ^ See Field, p. 312. 
 
 V. Dyson, L. R. 1. H. of L. 129. ^ juid, p. 314. 
 
142 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 sanction for their incidents if the tenant chose to demand it and 
 could prove the custom. The usage might, and generally did, 
 vary in different parts of Ulster (indeed even contiguous estates 
 might differ in minor points), but the tenant was merely 
 required to prove the particular customs, and that they had 
 prevailed for a reasonable time, and had not been created in 
 contemplation of the Act\ 
 
 Leaving the subject of holdings regulated by custom,^ the 
 Act then proceeds to lay down the rules under which com- 
 pensation for disturbance in the absence of usage is to be 
 computed. As has been said, the whole principle involved in 
 allowing such a claim, which was tantamount to the vesting 
 of a right in the land in the tenant, independent of his contract 
 with the landlord, was foreign to the theory of the Act of 1860. 
 The use of the term 'compensation for disturbance' also was 
 singularly unfortunate, as, even if it applied to the case of a 
 yearly tenancy, it is absolutely contrary to common sense when 
 applied to the claim against the landlord of a tenant who held 
 for a term certain which ended by completion of the term^ 
 
 When Mr Gladstone described the nature of the compen- 
 sation clauses in the Act^ he prefaced his remarks by giving a 
 comparison of the rent returns of the past century in Ireland, 
 England and Scotland, showing that while in the first case 
 they had only about doubled, in England they had trebled, 
 and in Scotland sextupled. He argued, therefore, as a proof 
 of the advantages of security of tenure to the tenant, that 
 the rents had increased in the three countries in the direct 
 ratio of the security of the tenure of the cultivator*. He 
 then carried the same argument further by shewing that 
 the increase in Ulster had been larger than in the rest of 
 Ireland owing to the increased rights of the tenant under the 
 Ulster custom, and the consequent restriction of the powers 
 of the landlord ^ The form which compensation for disturbance 
 
 1 See Kevan v. Lord de Eos, quoted in the Bill, February 15th, 1870. 
 
 by Richey, p. 106. ^ See Hansard, 3rd series, Vol. 
 
 2 See ante, p. 138, and Richey, p. 66 cxcix. p. 355, 356. 
 
 (note). ^ Mr Gladstone gave the following 
 
 ' When moving for leave to bring figures for Ireland — not including 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 143 
 
 in the absence of custom ultimately assumed when embodied 
 in the Act of 1870\ presents on analysis the following features: — 
 
 A. The tenant is only entitled to compensation under the 
 general clauses when: — 
 
 (By section 3,) 
 
 1. He is not entitled to claim under the Ulster or 
 similar customs : or 
 
 2. Being so entitled elects not to claim under them. 
 
 3. Is disturbed by the act of the landlord: — 
 
 While for the purposes of the Act the following are not 
 deemed disturbances by the landlord of such a kind as to 
 entitle the tenant to compensation : — 
 
 (By section 9,) 
 
 (1) An ejectment for non-payment of rent. 
 
 (2) An ejectment for breach of any conditions against 
 
 assignment, subletting, bankruptcy or insolvency. 
 Provided that the Court may, if it think fit, hold 
 an ejectment for non-payment of rent to be a 
 disturbance in the case of a tenancy existing at 
 the time of the passing of the Act, and con- 
 tinuing to exist without alteration of rent up to 
 the time of such determination, if 
 a. rent arrears did not accrue within the last 
 three years, and if any earlier arrears re- 
 mained due from the tenant at the time of 
 commencing the ejectment: — or 
 6. the rent of the holding is under £15 per annum 
 and the Court certifies that the rent is ex- 
 orbitant ^ 
 
 Ulster : Rentals in 1779 (according to series, Vol. cxcix. p. 357. 
 
 Arthur Young), £5,000,000, in 1869 ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46. 
 
 £9,200,000, i.e. less than double. ^ This provision turned out almost 
 
 While in Ulster during the same inoperative, and was for the most part 
 
 period the increase was more than unnoticed, the use of the word ' exor- 
 
 threefold, though the soil was far bitant ' contributing to this result, 
 
 less productive. See Hansard, 3rd Bessborough Commission, § 21. 
 
144 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 (By section 10,) 
 
 (3) The resumption by the landlord from a yearly 
 
 tenant of not more than ^sth. of his holding for 
 the purpose of erecting labourers' cottages 
 thereon, and which was resumed after six 
 months' notice to the tenant, unless the Court 
 shall hold such resumption unreasonable. 
 
 (By section 14,) 
 
 (4) Where the yearly tenant is evicted for the per- 
 
 sistent exercise of any right 
 
 a. not necesssary to the due cultivation of his 
 
 holding : — and 
 
 b. forbidden by his agreement with his landlord. 
 
 (5) Where the yearly tenant is evicted for persistently 
 
 and unreasonably refusing to allow the landlord, 
 or those authorized by him, to enter on the 
 holding for certain specified purposes, e.g. 
 mining, cutting turf, &c. 
 
 B. The landlord can deduct from the compensation : — 
 (By section 3,) 
 
 1. Amount of arrears of rent due by the tenant or his pre- 
 decessors in title. 
 
 2. Sums due in respect of deterioration of the holding owing 
 to the non-observance on the part of the tenant of any covenant. 
 
 3. Any taxes due on the holding and payable by the tenant. 
 
 C. The tenant is not entitled to compensation who, after the 
 passing of the Act : — 
 
 (By section 3,) 
 
 1. Subdivides or sublets his holding without the consent 
 in writing of the landlord. 
 
 2. After prohibition in writing lets it in conacre, save for 
 the purpose of being solely used for green crops. 
 
 3. Holds for a lease for more than 31 years. 
 (By section 12,) 
 
 4. Has contracted in writing not to make such claim. 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 145 
 
 Provided that 
 
 (1) his holding is over £50 annual value, 
 
 (2) it is not subject to customary usage. 
 (By section 13,) 
 
 5. When the tenancy is from year to year existing at 
 the time of the passing of the Act assigns 
 
 , (1) without the consent of the landlord, and 
 (2) landlord does not accept assignee. 
 Provided that 
 
 I. sufficient rent is in arrears at the time of the assign- 
 
 ment to render the tenant liable to eviction : — or 
 
 II. such assignment is contrary to the customary usage 
 
 of the estate : — or 
 III. the Court thinks the landlord's refusal to accept 
 the new tenant to be reasonable \ 
 
 On examination it is seen that one of the most striking 
 of the above provisions is that which enables an ejectment 
 by the landlord, even for non-payment of rent or for breach 
 of covenant, to be held a disturbance (and hence to entitle the 
 tenant to compensation), if the holding is under £15 annual 
 value^ and the Court certifies that the rent is exorbitant. The 
 reason of the exemption of the two cases of non-payment of 
 rent and breach of covenant from the disturbances by the land- 
 lord which were penalized in damages is the fact that the 
 eviction results from the tenant's own act. It is hard to 
 logically support the exemption of holdings under £15 from 
 this rule on account of the rent being exorbitant, as such an 
 argument would apply equally to holdings at a higher rental. 
 The reason for the enactment no doubt was a desire to 
 shelter the small tenants whose rent was forced up by the 
 action of the landlord, who might hence be said to be himself 
 the origin of the act on which eviction was taken. Plainly 
 however, when the high rent was the result of the 'reckless 
 
 1 The transmission of a tenancy by the landlord in refusing compensation, 
 
 bequest to certain near relations or its Sec. 13. 
 
 devolution by operation of law is not ^ ggg ante, p. 143. 
 such an assignment as would justify 
 
 M, 10 
 
146 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 competition' of the tenants an exemption cannot be supported 
 on logical grounds, as the termination of the tenancy by evic- 
 tion on non-payment of rent in a double sense originates with 
 the tenant, in that (1) he did not pay his rent, and (2) he 
 voluntarily undertook more than he could perform \ Passing 
 from the grounds on which the compensation was to be given, 
 or on which exemption could be claimed by the landlord, to the 
 nature and amount of the compensation itself, the rules of the 
 Act of 1870 appear open to objection. Section 3 enacts that the 
 limit of the compensation is to be regulated thus; holdings 
 valued under the Acts relating to the valuation of rateable 
 property in Ireland at an annual value of 
 
 (1) £10 and under, a sum which shall in no case exceed 
 seven years' rent. 
 
 (2) Above £10 and not exceeding £80, a sum which shall 
 in no case exceed five years' rent. 
 
 (3) Above £30 and not exceeding £40, a sum which shall 
 in no case exceed four years' rent. 
 
 (4) Above £40 and not exceeding £50, a sum which shall 
 in no case exceed three years' rent. 
 
 (5) Above £60 and not exceeding £100, a sum which shall 
 in no case exceed two years' rent. 
 
 (6) Above £100, a sum which shall in no case exceed one 
 year's rent. 
 
 But in no case shall the compensation exceed the sum of 
 £250^ 
 
 The late Dr Richey, in criticising the scheme of compen- 
 sation adopted here, said, — "as the maximum of the compen- 
 sation in each case is calculated upon the basis, not of the 
 valuation, but of the rent, the amount of compensation varies 
 in the inverse ratio of the value of the interest, which has been 
 lost by the tenant. The higher the rent reserved upon a lease, 
 the less it will fetch at an auction ; and on the other hand its 
 
 1 See Kichey, pp. 73, 74 and note. pensation for disturbance by the im- 
 
 2 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 3. The mediate landlord is given on the same 
 scale of compensation quoted applies scale in the case of yearly tenancies 
 to tenancies created after the passing of existing at the time of the passing of 
 the Act, but by the same section com- the Act. 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 147 
 
 value would be augmented if the rent were reduced. If A be 
 tenant from year to year of a farm valued at £10, and pays a 
 rent of £15 per annum, and B holds a farm of equal rating but 
 pays only £5 per annum rent, it is manifest that B's interest in 
 his holding is much more valuable than that of A ; under this 
 section, however, A would be entitled to the sum of £105 as 
 compensation for disturbance, but B only to £35 \" 
 
 In addition to the foregoing objections to the system on 
 which the compensation was calculated ^ it has been already 
 mentioned that the amount of the compensation to be paid was 
 found insufficient to check the action of the evicting landlord, 
 owing to the fact that a new tenant was often to be found who ■ 
 was ready to pay the compensation to the outgoing tenant in 
 order to gain possession of the holding. This same fact tended 
 also to produce large holdings — a most unexpected result — for 
 if a tenant A, who already held a farm on an estate, expressed 
 a desire to take up other small holdings, and offered to pay the 
 compensation to the evicted tenants, it is obvious that the 
 interest of the landlord would be strongly enlisted in the 
 change. The compensation he would have to pay to A, should 
 he afterwards evict him from the enlarged holding, would 
 be far less than the combined compensation he would have 
 had to pay to the other small holders. It is also plain that 
 the mode of compensation here adopted is a bar to the creation 
 of improvements by the landlord, since these would, although 
 
 1 See Kichey, pp. 68 and 69. This a separate or additional claim for 
 
 relates of course merely to compensa- improvements other than permanent 
 
 tion for disturbance, and is founded buildings and reclamation of waste 
 
 on the theory of the maximum value land. 
 
 having been awarded in both cases. ^ In practice the result of the statu- 
 
 It does not affect the position of A and tory limitations of the compensation 
 
 B as regards compensation for im- for disturbance, combined with the 
 
 provements; but it should be noticed discretion given to County Court Judges 
 
 that sec. 3 also enacts that no tenant as to assessal, resulted in a rough and 
 
 of a holding valued at a yearly sum ready administration of justice. The 
 
 exceeding £10 and claiming under this Judges taking the tenant as primd 
 
 section more than four years' rent, and facie entitled to the full amount of the 
 
 no tenant of a holding valued at a compensation, and casting upon the 
 
 yearly sum not exceeding £10 and landlord the onus of proving claims in 
 
 claiming as aforesaid more than five reduction, 
 years' rent, shall be entitled to make 
 
 10—2 
 
148 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 increasing the rent, at the same time probably raise the com- 
 pensation which must be paid on terminating the holdings \ 
 
 The difficulty that under compulsion the tenants might 
 agree to contract themselves out of these provisions for compen- 
 sation was met by section 3, which made such a contract void 
 both in law and equity (subject to exception if the holding was 
 of more than £50 annual value and the contract not to claim 
 was in writing'^). Mr Gladstone thus justified this enactment: 
 " our desire is to interfere with freedom of contract as little as 
 possible. We are about to interfere with it in regard to the 
 terms on which minor tenancies may be taken up, because we 
 say that in the circumstances of Ireland the tenant is not free ; 
 but as we move upwards in the scale of the value of holdings, 
 at last, undoubtedly, we reach a point where the tenant may be 
 said to be free I" 
 
 In order to prevent the landlord changing the nature of 
 the tenancies granted, so as to escape on a side issue from 
 his liability to compensation, section 69 enacted that a tenancy 
 at will, or less than a tenancy from year to year, gave the 
 tenant the same rights as to notice to quit and compensation 
 as did a tenancy from year to year. Only one more point need 
 be dealt with before leaving the subject of compensation for 
 disturbance and passing to the enactments as to improvements — 
 this point is the question of the rights of sub-tenants, which is 
 dealt with in section 20 in a highly inadequate manner. By 
 this section, when the estate of the middleman terminates " by 
 reason of disturbance or otherwise" and "involves the interests 
 of any such persons other than the tenant quitting his holding, 
 the Court shall determine the whole amount payable under this 
 Act on the occasion of such tenant quitting his holding and 
 shall direct payment of the same by such person, and to such 
 one or more of the persons interested, and in such manner 
 as the Court thinks just." It is plain that the amount due 
 from the superior landlord to the evicted middleman would 
 probably be a far smaller sum than that to which the combined 
 claims of his tenants would have amounted, had he himself 
 
 1 A very interesting example of this ^ gee. 12, and see ante, p. 145. 
 
 is given by Dr Richey, pp. 70 and 71. ^ Hansard, 3rd series, cxcix. p. 370. 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 149 
 
 evicted them. Therefore, though the tenant is in each case 
 turned from his holding, the amount of compensation he receives 
 is widely different^; a very unsatisfactory result^ 
 
 The second object aimed at by the Act of 1870 was the 
 settlement of the vexed question of improvements by compen- 
 sating the tenant on the termination of his tenancy for those of 
 a permanent nature which he had made in his holding. Mr 
 Gladstone, in his speech on the motion, established very clearly 
 the equitable claim of the tenants to some such protection. 
 When alluding to the effect of the Incumbered Estates Act 1848^ 
 he drew attention to the fact that while the older class of land- 
 lords had but in few cases improperly increased the rents of the 
 holdings on the ground of improvements which the tenants had 
 themselves made ; yet, when the properties of these landlords 
 came into the Incumbered Estates Court, "the purchasers 
 bought them as they were, and no distinction was drawn between 
 the soil itself and the improvements made by the tenant. So 
 that the improvements were sold to persons who gave a price for 
 them ; sold away from the tenant to whom they ought to have 
 belonged ; and the price was paid to the outgoing landlord, who 
 undoubtedly ought not to have been entitled to claim the pro- 
 perty in them, and would not have been so entitled if the 
 legislation recommended in 1845* had been adopted^". 
 
 The form taken by the provisions enacted for the purpose of 
 thus compensating the tenant was : — that any tenant who is 
 not entitled (or being entitled does not claim) under the Ulster 
 or similar customs, may claim compensation for improvements 
 which have been made by himself or his predecessors in title ^: 
 save in the following cases : 
 
 1 Dr Eichey gives an illustration of landlord; unless (1) the landlord has 
 this, pp. 78, 79, and 80. given him permission to gain the sum 
 
 2 It should be noticed that by sec. 7 from the incoming tenant, (2) such 
 a tenant who has neither claimed com- money was paid during the existence 
 pensation for disturbance, nor under a of a lease, before the passing of the 
 customary right, is entitled to compen- Act. 
 
 sation on leaving his holding for money ^ 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48. 
 
 paid on coming into his holding by ^ By the Devon Commission, 
 
 himself or his predecessors in title with ^ Hansard, 3rd series, cxcix. p. 344. 
 
 the express or implied consent of the ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 4. 
 
 Lie^ 
 
 ^ V^ Of THE 
 
 UNIVERSITY 
 
160 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 (1) When the said improvements have been in exist- 
 
 ence for 20 years — (unless they consist of per- 
 manent buildings or reclamations of waste land, 
 in which cases he may claim). 
 
 (2) When the landlord has prohibited in writing the 
 
 making of such improvements as detrimental to 
 the estate \ 
 
 (3) When they were made in pursuance of a contract 
 
 for valuable consideration. 
 
 (4) When made in contravention of an agreement in 
 
 writing not to make such improvements (subject 
 to the rule as to when such a prohibitory con- 
 tract is allowed). 
 
 (5) When the landlord has undertaken to make the 
 
 said improvements (unless he has failed to do 
 so within reasonable time). 
 
 (6) When he holds under a lease or written contract 
 
 made before the Act in which his right to com- 
 pensation is expressly excluded. 
 
 (7) When he holds under a lease for 31 years, or one 
 
 which has actually so long subsisted : — (but here 
 compensation is allowed for permanent buildings, 
 unexhausted manures and reclamation of waste). 
 
 (8) When he is quitting voluntarily, and his land- 
 
 lord has given him permission to dispose of his 
 interest in the improvements to the incoming 
 tenant upon such terms as the Court may deem 
 reasonable, and he has refused or neglected to 
 avail himself of this permission. 
 
 When the amount of compensation is being reckoned all 
 sums due to the landlord for rent, deterioration of the holding 
 from breach of the tenant's covenants, or for the tenant's taxes, 
 may be deducted. 
 
 Further regulations in the same section'^ of the Act : — 
 
 1 When they appear to the Court to lease granted before the passing of the 
 
 be detrimental, and are made within Act, sec. 4, sub-s. (1). 
 
 two years after the passing of the Act, ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 4. 
 or during the unexpired residue of a 
 
I 
 
 X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 151 
 
 1. Render void any contract between landlord and tenant 
 whereby the latter is restrained from making improvements 
 required for the suitable occupation of his holding. 
 
 2. Render void any contract whereby the tenant is de- 
 prived of his right to claim compensation for improvements 
 (save in the cases above excepted; and in holdings over £50 
 annual value, and not subject to Ulster customs or the like, 
 where the contract is in writing). 
 
 3. Enact that when the improvements have been made 
 before the Act, the Court, in considering the amount of the 
 compensation to be granted, shall take into consideration the 
 length of time for which the tenant has had the use of them, 
 or any set-off which may have been granted by the landlord. 
 
 While 
 
 (By section 6) the landlord or tenant may register their 
 improvements in the Landed Estates Court, and 
 
 (By section 5^) the presumption of law is stated always to 
 be that any improvements are the work of the tenant; save in the 
 following cases, where compensation is claimed for improve- 
 ments made before the Act, and 
 
 I. the improvements were made previous to the time 
 
 when the title accrued by actual sale to the 
 landlord or those through whom he claims. 
 
 II. the tenant held under a lease. 
 
 III. the improvements were made 20 years before the Act. 
 
 IV. the holding is valued at over £100 annual value. 
 
 V. the Court holds, on the ground of the practice of 
 
 the estate, that such ought not to be presumed. 
 
 VI. the Court is satisfied that the improvements were 
 
 not the work of the tenant. 
 
 Provided that where it is proved to have been the practice 
 for the landlord to assist in making the improvements the pre- 
 sumption shall be modified accordingly. 
 
 The third object aimed at by the Act of 1870 was the 
 
 ^ Does not apply if (1) holding is (2) tenant seeks compensation under 
 Bubjeet to Ulster or similar customs ; them. 
 
152 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 establishment of peasant proprietors. For this purpose clauses 
 termed the Bright Clauses^ were inserted in the Act, the inten- 
 tion of which was to facilitate the purchase by a tenant of his 
 holding either 
 
 1. By agreement with his landlord, or 
 
 2. From the Court, in estates directed to be sold by the 
 Landed Estates Court. 
 
 In the first case the procedure to be adopted was that when 
 an agreement for the sale had been made between the landlord 
 and tenant, they might jointly (or either of them separately 
 with the assent of the other) apply to the Court to carry 
 out the sale^ 
 
 The powers of purchase given by the Act proved valueless 
 in both the case of a sale by agreement and a forced sale of an 
 incumbered estate ^ but the provisions for sales of the first class 
 proved even more faulty than those regulating the latter. The 
 general faults which marred the Bright Clauses proved to be : — 
 (1) The absolute title given by the Landed Estates Court 
 to the purchaser. It seems strange that this power of the Court 
 to give a title which absolutely extinguishes all rights adverse 
 to the terms of the grant should have operated as an evil ; for it 
 was not unnaturally supposed that the indefeasible nature of 
 the title given would have constituted its greatest advantage. 
 But the fact that no error could afterwards be remedied, that 
 the title given would hold, even if the clearest rights of third 
 parties proved to have been infringed, or more land than was 
 really saleable had been conveyed, paralyzed the action of the 
 Courts by the nicety of the enquiry needed*. 
 
 1 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 32 — 41. this course being found inconsistent 
 
 2 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 32. with the interests of owners and in- 
 
 3 Mr Justice Field says, " The provi- cumbrancers. " Landholding, p. 318. 
 sions for facihtating the acquisition ^ ggg Richey, pp. 82 and 85. *' A 
 by tenants of their holdings forming Landed Estates Court conveyance af- 
 part of estates the sale of which had fects not only the rights of the par- 
 been directed by the Landed Es- ties to the proceedings, but binds all 
 tates Court failed chiefly in conse- persons, whether parties or not, and 
 quence of the general refusal of the au- extinguishes all rights which are in- 
 thorities to arrange lots so as to suit consistent with the terms of the grant 
 the convenience of purchasing tenants, by the Court." 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 153 
 
 (2) The amount which the Commissioners of Public 
 Works in Ireland were allowed to advance to the tenant for 
 the purpose of purchasing his holding was not sufficient. By 
 the Act of 1870* the amount was limited to two-thirds of the 
 price of the holding^, and though it was increased by an Act 
 of 1872^ to two-thirds of the value of the holding (while on 
 being satisfied with the title the Board was able to make 
 advances to tenants purchasing by agreement with the land- 
 lords, without the expense of passing the holding through the 
 Landed Estates Court) it still proved to be inadequate. This 
 was due to two causes : 
 
 a. The provision of the Act of 1870* that where any 
 such advance was made the tenant was precluded from 
 alienating, assigning, or subletting his holding without the 
 consent of the Board, while any portion of the annuities 
 remained unpaid on pain of forfeiture ^ 
 
 fi. The Board, considering themselves as trustees for 
 public money, required unexceptionable securities for their 
 advances, and, in the opinion of the tenants, did not act 
 freely in the matter I 
 
 (3) The difficulty of making the tenants understand 
 their rights under the Act. 
 
 The special faults of the Act in regard to sales by agree- 
 ment were that : — 
 
 (1) The landlord is required to deposit with the applica- 
 
 1 Sec. 44, 45. viz. two-thirds in lieu of three-fourths 
 
 2 On such an advance the holding of the purchase-money. See Eeport of 
 was deemed to be charged with an Bessborough Commission, § 87. 
 annuity of £5 for every £100 of ^ ^5 & 36 Vict. c. 32, sec. 1. 
 
 such advance and so in proportion ^ 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 44. 
 for any less sum, such annuity to be ^ Power was given by the Amending 
 limited in favour of the Board and to Act of 1872 to commute forfeitures for 
 be declared to be repayable in the a sale and to pay the balance of the 
 term of 35 years (33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, s. proceeds to the original purchaser. 
 44,45). This makes the rate of interest ^ gee Eichey, p. 88. The Board 
 3^ per cent, and hence more favour- does not seem to have been in any 
 able than the terms of the Church way opposed to the creation of a pea- 
 Commissioners, but the proportion to sant proprietary, 
 be advanced on mortgage was less, 
 
154 THE ACT OF 1870. [CHAP. 
 
 tion a sum of money as security for costs if required by the 
 Court to do so\ In practice, as might have been expected, the 
 result of this was to cast the work of providing this sum upon 
 the tenant. 
 
 (2) All the cost of the complicated enquiry which the 
 nature of the title given by the Court rendered necessary (es- 
 pecially heavy when the landlord was only a limited owner) 
 had to be borne by the tenant, and single holdings proved 
 unequal to the task*^. 
 
 (3) The estate passed to the tenant, though free from in- 
 cumbrances, was, by section 36, still liable to certain charges, 
 such as quit rents, rent- charges in lieu of tithes, heriots, 
 charges for draining etc. As pointed out by the late Dr 
 E/ichey, though these charges were not felt by the tenant 
 paying an annual rent, they were a serious matter to pur- 
 chasers ; since if several tenants purchased their holdings the 
 person entitled to the charge could proceed against any one 
 of them for the amount of the whole charge ; and the Court 
 proved slow to use the powers given by section 40^ to apportion 
 charges, rents and covenants ^ While in the case of the sale of 
 separate holdings it was not possible to indemnify the purchaser 
 by casting the burden of the charge on the residue of the 
 landlord's estate, as this operation, if frequently repeated, would 
 at length render the residue of his land unsaleable. 
 
 The Act of 1870 had to undergo a stormy history. It is 
 probable that the inherent defects of the Act were so great 
 that in any case it would have signally failed to ameliorate the 
 tenants' position even had it had an unchequered career, but 
 
 1 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 34. rent should not in any appreciable 
 
 2 This question of excessive costs degree be made less secure, or less en- 
 was dwelt on in the Keport of the Com- joyable, or less marketable. It is idle to 
 mittee of the House of Commons 1877- suppose that the property of the owner 
 1878. of the head-rent would not be seriously 
 
 3 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, sec. 40. depreciated by being broken into se- 
 
 4 "The Court has always been slow veral smaller rent-charges apportioned 
 and unwilling to exercise the power of among the holdings of the tenants 
 apportioning rent-charges upon the who had purchased the fee under the 
 premises sold, and requires it to be sections in question." Eichey, pp. 86, 
 clearly shown that the interest of the 87. 
 
X.] THE ACT OF 1870. 155 
 
 it was also met by a fatal combination of circumstances. Not 
 only was an agitation, which even if rooted in distress was un- 
 scrupulous and fanatical in operation, directed against it ; but 
 the very elements conspired to wreck its chances. At first the 
 prosperous seasons veiled the evil, but they only (by raising 
 the credit of the tenants and so enabling them to load them- 
 selves with debt) increased the troubles which the subsequent 
 depression brought; and it cannot be denied that the only 
 effect of the Act was to afford new grievances to both landlord 
 and tenant. 
 
CHAPTER XI. 
 
 The Act of 1881. 
 
 The years following 1870 were at first jesirs of unusual 
 prosperity for Ireland. In 1872 the exports of goods from 
 Belfast rose to an excess of £2,300,000^ more than in 1870, and 
 to an excess of £3,400,000 over 1869 ; though unfortunately this 
 was accompanied by a corresponding increase in the population. 
 The general cotton trade revived, and some remarkable figures 
 are given in Dr Hancock's'^ report of the Irish savings and 
 other banks ; he says " the aggregate investments of the Irish 
 people in Government joint-stock banks and savings banks on 
 the 31st of December 1870 were £63,553,251, and on the 
 31st of December 1871, £67,331,778, showing an increase of 
 £3,778,527, or £6 per cent." In 1875 despite the existence 
 of an element of discontent the relation of landlord and tenant 
 was not unfriendly ; and English opinion attached very little 
 importance to the growing Home Rule agitation. In the North 
 of Ireland, however, it was evident that a determined struggle 
 was being made to obtain a larger concession of tenant-right 
 than the Act afforded. 
 
 In 1879 a miserable season not only destroyed the potato 
 crop, but also (by the incessant rain preventing the turf from 
 drying) almost caused a fuel famine. The exports of the country 
 diminished, bank deposits sank, and bankruptcies among the 
 tenant farmers became common ^ The money-lender, that bane 
 of the Irish peasant, pressed for payment, and the agrarian 
 difficulties again became acute. The anti-rent agitation rose 
 
 1 See Statement to the Belfast Cham- 2 See Annual Register, 1872. 
 
 ber of Commerce made by Mr Spotten, ** See Annual Register, 1879. 
 
 and quoted in Annual Register, 1872. 
 
CHAP. XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 157 
 
 in Mayo and Galway, and was carried on in most unscrupulous 
 fashion. Gathering to itself the whole of the disaffected popu- 
 lation, and trading on the real misery which the agricultural 
 depression had caused, the movement rapidly became formidable. 
 The Irish Land League was formed, and the agitation was 
 pointedly directed to obtaining for Ireland a peasant proprietor- 
 ship ; the examples of France, Germany and Russia — especially 
 the first — being largely appealed to. 
 
 It is very noticeable how far the claims of the tenants were 
 now pushed, and it is in a great measure to this creation of a 
 desire for complete possession of the land that the failure of the 
 Act of 1881 may be ascribed. Had the three F's^ been given in 
 1870, when they were practically the limit of the tenants' de- 
 mand, the settlement of the land question might possibly have 
 been achieved. . Unfortunately the Act when passed was only 
 a tardy concession to circumstances, and did nothing to satisfy 
 the wild hopes that had been created. The advocacy of out- 
 rage, and the sad catalogue of agrarian crime which the fol- 
 lowing years present, is a terrible commentary on the force of 
 the passions aroused. The year 1880 was marked by a con- 
 tinued, indeed an increased, depression ; the invention of " boy- 
 cotting " placed a new and most formidable offensive weapon in 
 the hands of the most unscrupulous of the agitators, and the 
 land system of Ireland was practically at a deadlock. In the 
 midst of social tumult and extreme depression Mr Gladstone 
 again essayed the solution of the difficulty. 
 
 Fortunately in considering the position of the Irish land 
 system prior to the Act of 1881, we are possessed of two most 
 valuable sources of information in the evidence collected by, 
 and the reports of, two Commissions (called respectively the 
 Richmond and the Bessborough Commissions), appointed to en- 
 quire into the agricultural position in Ireland and the working 
 of the Act of 1870. The former of these issued in August 1879, 
 and, though different opinions as to the most advantageous 
 remedies to be applied to the existing evils were held by the 
 Commissioners, the reports and evidence concur in showing : — 
 (1) That there was widespread distress and dissatisfaction in 
 1 Fixity of tenure, fair rent, and free sale. See post, p. 159, 160. 
 
158 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. 
 
 the country, and (2) That the Act of 1870 had done nothing 
 towards a satisfactory solution of the land question. 
 
 The preliminary report issued in January 1881 by the 
 majority of the Commissioners gave us the chief causes of the 
 unfortunate state of landed relations : 
 
 1. The inclemency of the seasons, and the failure of the 
 potato crop. 
 
 2. Foreign competition. 
 
 3. An undue inflation of credit produced by the security 
 afforded by the Land Act of 1870, and by a series of prosperous 
 seasons. 
 
 4. The excessive competition for land (mainly due to the 
 fact that apart from the actual possession of the soil, there were 
 few, if any, means of subsistence for the population), which had 
 led to serious abuses, such as : — 
 
 (1) Unreasonable payments for tenant-right. 
 
 (2) Arbitrary increase of rents. 
 
 (3) Overcrowding of the population in certain districts. 
 
 (4) Minute subdivision of farms \ 
 
 Only one of these heads requires a special mention, that is 
 the one dwelling on the evils of the inflation of credit produced 
 by the Act of 1870. It has been pointed out that, although 
 the object was attained by enactments of a negative kind^, this 
 Act vested a tangible interest in the land in the tenant. An 
 instant expansion in his borrowing capacity followed. Small 
 banks sprang into existence, and money (though not un- 
 frequently at usurious interest) became freely obtainable by the 
 most improvident peasantry in the world. Shop accounts were 
 allowed to run, and small loads of debt were gradually accu- 
 mulated by the farmers. The years of agricultural prosperity 
 which followed 1870 led the farmer class to look hopefully on 
 the future, and when the years of depression ensued they were 
 dragged down not only by the failure of their source of income, 
 but also by an ever increasing load of debt, which nothing but 
 perpetual prosperity could have enabled them to discharge ^ 
 
 1 Richmond Commission. s ^.nd see on this subject Richey, 
 
 2 See ante, page 137. pp. 98, 99. 
 
XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 159 
 
 On the 29th of July 1880 the second Commission^ issued, 
 appointing a special examination into the working of the Act 
 of 1870. It is doubly important, both as showing the state of 
 landed relations in Ireland as affected by this Act, and also as 
 furnishing the basis of the Act of 1881 in which Mr Gladstone 
 again dealt with the land question. Most of the reasons ad- 
 vanced by the Bessborough Commission to account for the 
 failure of the former Act have been dealt with in the last 
 chapter, the increase of rents, the insecurity of tenure still 
 existing, the inadequacy of the compensation given, its un- 
 suitability to meet the needs of the tenant, and other faults. 
 The evidence with which these propositions are illustrated is 
 both clear and voluminous, and shows in addition how critical 
 the situation really was with which the Legislature was about 
 to grapple. 
 
 The Commissioners again differed considerably in the view 
 they took of the land question, but in their principal report^ 
 they stated that the method of the Act of 1870, by which the 
 tenant's interest was dealt with by indirect means, was not 
 suitable. They went on to point out that the distinction drawn 
 between tenancies under Ulster custom and other tenancies 
 was a mistake : and stated that the Ulster custom, as legalized, 
 had failed, showing the same weak points as characterised the 
 land law of the rest of Ireland. They suggested '' that in future 
 the same land law should prevail throughout Ireland, and that 
 the yearly tenants, in every part of the kingdom, should possess 
 the same rights and be subject to the same obligations^" 
 Finally they advocated a change of the law based on the con- 
 cession to the tenant of ' Fixity of Tenure,' ' Fair Eent ' and 
 ' Free Sale ' — that is, the notorious three F's. 
 
 On the 7th of April Mr Gladstone, on a motion for leave to 
 
 1 The Bessborough Commission. but the O'Connor Don and Mr Shaw 
 
 2 Five Commissioners were appointed, also sent in supplementary reports 
 viz. The Earl of Bessborough, Baron expressing different views as to the 
 Dowse, The O'Connor Don, Mr William remedy to be adopted for admitted 
 Shaw and Mr Kavanagh. The main evils. 
 
 report was signed by all save Mr Ka- ^ Report of Bessborough Commis- 
 
 vanagh (who gave a separate report), sion, pp. 13—39. 
 
160 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. 
 
 bring in the Land Law (Ireland) Bill 1881, explained in a lengthy 
 speech the lines on which it was proposed to legislate, amounting 
 shortly to a recognition of the three F's and the creation of a 
 special Court for the purposes of the Act. On the 22nd of 
 August 1881 the Act, 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, became law. Besides 
 many blots in this celebrated Statute, which will be treated 
 of in detail when considering its provisions, it may at the out- 
 set be stated that there is much reason to believe that a more 
 advantageous step would have been taken had the previous 
 Acts been completely repealed, and a new, rather than an 
 amending, Statute passed. The paralyzing subtlety of the Act 
 of 1881 was largely increased by its enactments being supple- 
 mentary rather than final; while the process rendering the 
 invocation of the action of the Court necessary was eminently 
 unsuitable to the condition of the country. The prevailing in- 
 fluence of the combination of agitators which has been exerted 
 against the Act; the ingrained distaste of the peasantry to 
 trust themselves in the hands of the law ; the widespread 
 feeling that time will bring even larger concessions^ ; and the 
 cost involved in making the application, have all contributed 
 to prevent the tenants resorting largely to the Courts. 
 
 The length of the Act prevents the possibility of giving a 
 full summary of its provisions, but its principal features are as 
 follows. First, dealing with the subject of free sale, the tenant 
 for the time being of every holding not specially excepted '^ was 
 enabled to sell his tenancy for the best price he could get^ pro- 
 
 1 See 2nd article on the Land Sys- valued at not less than £50 per an- 
 tevi of Ireland, by his Honour Judge num ; (4) holdings let for pasturage 
 O'Connor Morris. Laio Quarterly Re- when the tenant is non-resident ; (5) 
 view, January, 1888. holdings in virtue of being a hired 
 
 2 The definition of tenant given in labourer or servant; (6) lettings in 
 sec. 57 excludes middlemen; and notice conacre, etc.; (7) holdings let to 
 the tenancies which are excepted by tenant whilst retaining any office or 
 sec. 58 from the operation of the Act employment, or for temporary conve- 
 (save as regards part v, and in so far nience or necessity (provided there be 
 as it amends the Act of 1870 with contract in writing showing the object 
 regard to improvements), viz. (1) any of the letting); (8) cottage allotments 
 holding not agricultural or pastoral ; not exceeding half an acre ; (9) glebes. 
 
 (2) demesne lands and town parks; ^ M & 4:5 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1. 
 
 (3) any holding let for pasture and 
 
XL] THE ACT OF 1881. 161 
 
 vided that certain regulations were complied with\ Of these 
 the principal were that it should be sold, save with the consent 
 of the landlord ^ to one person only ; that the proposed new 
 tenant was not refused by the landlord on reasonable grounds^ ; 
 and that notice was given by the tenant to the landlord of his 
 intention to sell^ of the name of the purchaser, and of the con- 
 sideration agreed on for the purchase^ The landlord on his 
 part, on receiving notice of the intended sale, has the option of 
 buying in the tenancy^, and of refusing the new tenant on 
 reasonable grounds^, or if he fails to satisfy acknowledged 
 claims against the outgoing tenant for arrears of rent, or for 
 breaches of covenant ^ When he receives notice of an intended 
 sale the landlord, if he is not desirous of purchasing the tenancy 
 "otherwise than as a means of securing the payment of any 
 sums due to him for arrears of rent or other breaches of the 
 contract or conditions of tenancy," if the tenant proceeds with 
 the sale may purchase the tenancy for the sum he claims, pro- 
 vided no purchaser is found to give the same or morel 
 
 As regards the question of improvements, when any of a 
 permanent nature have been made by the landlord they may, if 
 he consents, be sold with the holding, and he will be entitled to 
 the portion of the purchase-money obtained by their sale*". The 
 
 1 And subject to the provisions of the passing of the Act to another 
 the Act as to the sale of a tenancy tenant it is subject to the provisions 
 under statutory conditions. regulating present tenancies. Sec. 20, 
 
 2 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1, sub-sec. sub-sec. (3). See post p. 162 (note 4). 
 (1) ; and by sec. 2 the tenant from year ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (6). 
 
 to year was prohibited from subdividing ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (9). By sub-sec. 
 
 or subletting his holding without the (15) any sum payable to the landlord 
 
 consent in writing of the landlord. out of the purchase-money is a first 
 
 3 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (6). charge thereon. By sub-sec. (7) in the 
 
 4 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (2). case of a sale by a landlord on account 
 ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (4). of a breach of a statutory condition, 
 6 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (3). The price to the Court has power to grant pay- 
 be agreed upon, or in event of dis- ment of debt, arrears, or damages to 
 agreement to be settled by the Court. the landlord from the purchase -money. 
 Where the landlord purchases a pre- ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1, sub-sec. 
 sent holding neither by the wish of (16). 
 
 the tenant nor in open market, if the i*' 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 1, sub-sec. 
 
 holding is re-let within 15 years from (8), and said improvements are then 
 
 M. 11 
 
162 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. 
 
 tenant who has sold his tenancy on quitting his holding is not 
 entitled to receive compensation for improvements or for dis- 
 turbance \ Ulster tenant-right customs are not interfered 
 with ; the tenant can sell either under the usage or under 
 the Act as he thinks best^ ; but if a tenancy subject to Ulster, 
 or similar usage, be sold under the Act the tenancy remains 
 subject to the custom unless it has been purchased by the 
 landlord I 
 
 The Act then proceeds to a series of provisions by which 
 the tenant is able to commute his tenure into a protected 
 term for fifteen years, and which is in fact renewable without 
 limit. The way in which this was achieved was in the highest 
 degree ingenious, but the very elaboration of its details hindered 
 practical efficiency. Dealing first with the case where an in- 
 crease of rent is demanded by the landlord from the tenant of a 
 present tenancy* (or in the case of a future tenancy where the 
 landlord demands an increase of rent beyond the amount fixed 
 at its commencement), it provides that if the tenant agrees to 
 continue his holding at the higher rent his tenancy is for the 
 term of fifteen years regulated by what are termed statutory 
 conditions^. These are : that^ provided the tenant 
 
 (1) duly pays his rent, 
 
 (2) does not commit persistent waste, 
 
 (3) does not (without the consent in writing of the land- 
 lord) subdivide or sublet the holding, or erect any dwell- 
 ing-house thereon, save as provided in the Act, otherwise 
 than in substitution for those already there at the date 
 of the passing of the Act, 
 
 deemed to have been made by the of the passing of the Act, or created 
 
 purchaser. before the first of January, 1883, in a 
 
 1 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (11). And a tenant holding in which a tenancy was sub- 
 who has received compensation for dis- sisting at the time of the Act passing, 
 turbance or improvement is not entitled And every tenancy to which the Act 
 at the same time to sell his tenancy. applies is deemed a present tenancy 
 
 2 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (12), and see post until the contrary is proved. Sec. 57. 
 p. 163, 164 for new scale of compensa- ^ Sec. 4, sub-sec. (1). The term of 
 tion, etc. 15 years is called a statutory term. 
 
 3 Sec. 1, sub-sec. (13). « Sec. 5. 
 ^ That is, one subsisting at the time 
 
XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 163 
 
 (4) does not, by any Act, cause the holding to vest in an 
 assignee in bankruptcy, 
 
 (5) permits the entrance of the landlord to cut timber, 
 mine, shoot, etc., 
 
 (6) does not, without consent, open any house on the hold- 
 ing for the sale of intoxicating liquors, 
 
 he shall not be compelled to pay any higher rent than that 
 settled at the commencement of his statutory term, and shall not 
 be ousted from the holding, save for breach of one of the statu- 
 tory conditions. The landlord also is prohibited from taking pro- 
 ceedings to compel the tenant to quit his holding for breach of 
 any of the statutory conditions save as follows (a) where the con- 
 dition broken is that of due payment of rent he can proceed by 
 ejectment, (6) where the condition broken is any other statutory 
 condition, then by ejectment founded on notice to quit\ the 
 Court being allowed to grant relief against forfeiture upon 
 payment of damages or otherwise, if it should appear equitablel 
 If on the increase of rent being proposed the tenant refuses 
 to pay the higher rate he may claim compensation for dis- 
 turbance if he is compelled to abandon the holding by notice to 
 quit and does not sell the tenancy^ The Act of 1881 provides 
 an amended scale of compensation for disturbance'', which is, as 
 regards all tenancies above the annual rental of £10, higher 
 than the scale given in the Act of 1870^ and is also more 
 equitable, as not only is the amount of compensation regulated 
 with regard to the rent paid, but the classes of holdings are 
 
 ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 13, sub- by breach of a statutory condition, 
 
 sec. (3) b. The purchaser of a present tenancy 
 
 2 See Field, p. 333, and 44 & 45 sold in consequence of a breach of a 
 Vict. c. 49, sec. 13, sub-sec. (3) & (4). A statutory condition was not entitled to 
 tenant compelled to quit his holding claim a judicial rent, but might hold at 
 during the continuance of a statutory a previously settled rent for the re- 
 term in his tenancy, in consequence of mainder of the statutory term. This 
 a breach by him of a statutory condi- applies also to the case of a tenancy not 
 tion, lost his right to compensation for subject to statutory conditions in case 
 disturbance, sec. 13, sub-sec. (6) : but of a similar breach. Sec. 20. 
 by sec. 20, sub-sec. (4), if he held under ^ ggc. 4 sub-sec. (3), and sec. 6. 
 the Ulster tenant-right custom he was ^ Sec. 6. 
 
 entitled to the benefit of the custom ^ The limit of £250 as the maxi- 
 
 despite the termination of his tenancy mum of compensation was abolished. 
 
 11—2 
 
164 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. 
 
 also regulated in the same way. The faults pointed out 
 therefore in the compensation clauses of the Act of 1870 (where 
 in the case of two tenants holding farms of the same valuation, 
 but one paying more rent than the other, the absurd result was 
 reached that the tenant who paid less rent, and hence had the 
 most valuable interest in his holding, was prima facie entitled 
 to the smaller compensation for losing his farm^) are avoided, 
 and a more reasonable measure of compensation afforded. In ad- 
 dition, section 3 of the Act of 1870 was amended by the striking 
 out of the words " for the loss which the Court shall find to be 
 sustained by him by reason of quitting his holding," so that the 
 tenant is entitled to such compensation as the Court, in view 
 of all the circumstances of the case thinks proper, subject of 
 course to the scale of compensation given in the Act of 1881. 
 
 A further protection is given to the tenant in that his 
 right to sell his holding is not barred by the landlord having 
 taken proceedings to compel him to quit ; for at any time before 
 six months from the execution of a writ or decree for possession 
 in an ejectment for non-payment of rent^ he may sell his 
 tenancy, and if sold it is held to be an existing tenancy de- 
 spite these proceedings I 
 
 As regards compensation for improvements also a step 
 further is taken, The provisions of the Act of 1870 had 
 rendered it possible for a landlord in many cases by changing 
 the rent of a holding, or by a slight alteration of the holding, to 
 create a new tenancy, even though the same tenant remained 
 in possession, and hence to bar the claim of the tenant to com- 
 pensation* ; but the Act of 1881 prevents the creation of such 
 a new tenancy from rendering void the right to compensation ^ 
 
 ^ See ante, pp. 146, 147. ancy is not redeemed within six 
 
 2 And he might also sell his tenancy months, being however preserved. Sec. 
 at any time before, but not after, the 13, sub-sec. (1). 
 
 execution of such writ or decree in any ^ This was rendered possible by the 
 
 other ejectment than for non-payment construction given to the words " made 
 
 of rent. Sec. 13 (1). And within the by himself (the tenant) or his predeces- 
 
 same periods, if the decree has been sors in title." See Field, p. 317, 318, 
 
 obtained before the Act, the tenant and 333, and Irish Land Acts, by G. 
 
 may apply to the Court to fix the judi- McDermot. 
 
 cial rent of the holding. ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 7. 
 
 3 The landlord's rights, if the ten- 
 
XL] THE ACT OF 1881. 165 
 
 If the tenant whose rent the landlord proposes to raise 
 does not wish to accept the increase the Act provides also 
 another remedy for him\ This remedy varies according as 
 the tenancy is a present^ or a future one*. (1) In the case of a 
 present tenancy the tenant can make an application to the 
 Court to fix the fair rent ^ for the holding. This right to get a 
 fair rent fixed, moreover, is not confined to the case where the 
 landlord desires to raise the rent of the holding; for by sec- 
 tion 8^, the tenant of any present tenancy to which the Act ap- 
 plies, or such tenant and the landlord jointly, or the landlord 
 when he has failed to come to an agreement with the tenant, 
 may apply to the Court to fix the fair rent of the holding. When 
 the judicial rent has been fixed by the Court, then for fifteen 
 years the tenancy becomes one subject to statutory conditions ^ 
 During that time the rent cannot be altered': while even if 
 proceedings have been taken to compel the tenant to quit his 
 holding, and are pending before the application of the tenant 
 to the Court to fix a judicial rent is disposed of, the Court has 
 the power to postpone or suspend such proceedings till the 
 question of the judicial rent is settled^ In the case of a present 
 tenancy also, which is not a statutory term, the landlord and 
 tenant, if they agree in writing as to what is then a fair rent 
 for the holding and file the agreement in Court, can commute 
 the tenancy into a statutory term^. (2) In the case of a future 
 tenancy the tenant, if he refuses to pay an increase of rent 
 demanded by the landlord, may sell the tenancy, which is then 
 
 i See Field, p. 331. « Sec. 8, sub-sec. (3). 
 
 2 See ante, p. 162, note (4). ^ An application to the Court to de- 
 
 3 i.e. created after the passing of the termine a judicial rent may not be 
 Act. made except during the last twelve 
 
 * Sec. 8 (1). By sub-sec. 5, more- months of the current statutory term, 
 over, the Court may also on applica- Sec. 8, sub-sec. (8). But notice the in- 
 tion fix the value of the holding, and terference with the ' fair rents ' under 
 then if during the term the tenant the Act of 1887. It was rendered ne- 
 gives notice to sell, the landlord may cessary by the severe agricultural de- 
 purchase at that value plus any addition pression. See ^os« p. 180, 181. 
 for extra improvements. This section ^ Sec. 13, sub-sec. (3). 
 does not apply to holdings under the ^ Sec. 8, sub-sec. (6). A similar agree- 
 Ulster custom. ment may be made during the last 
 
 5 Sub-sec. (1). twelve months of a statutory term. 
 
166 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. 
 
 to be sold subject to the increased rent, and the tenant is en- 
 titled to receive from the landlord any sum by which the Court 
 shall decide the selling value of his tenancy to have been de- 
 preciated below what it would have fetched at a fair rent : while 
 in addition the Court may grant him the costs of the saleV 
 
 Under the Act of 1870 efforts were made to force the hand 
 of the landlord, and to make him in his own interest create 
 leases for a term of not less than 31 yearsl The Act of 1881 
 also offered facilities for the creation of terms of this kind; 
 enacting that, if the tenant of a tenancy to which the Act 
 applies is not in possession of either a statutory or a fixed 
 tenancy, a lease by agreement between the landlord and such 
 tenant for not less than 31 years shall, when sanctioned by the 
 Court, become a 'judicial lease ' and lie outside the provisions of 
 the statute I 
 
 Yet another species of tenure might be created under the 
 Act of 1881 by agreement between landlord and tenant, and 
 substituted for that previously existing in the holding, namely, 
 what is described as a 'fixed tenancy*.' The conditions of this 
 kind of holding are mainly dependent on the agreement be- 
 tween the parties, subject to the proviso that the tenant (1) 
 pays a fee-farm rent^ and (2) is not to be compelled to leave 
 his holding save on breach of a statutory condition. 
 
 The result of the provisions as to fixity of tenure^ which 
 
 1 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 4, sub- the lessee shall be deemed to be the 
 sec. (2). tenant of a present ordinary tenancy" 
 
 2 See ante, pp. 137, 138. (i.e. one neither (a) subject to statutory 
 
 3 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 10. conditions, nor (&) to a judicial lease, nor 
 These provisions apply also to the pro- (c) a fixed tenancy, but which is within 
 posed tenant of any holding to which the Act. See sec. 5) " from year to year 
 the Act applies and which is not sub- at the rent and subject to the condi- 
 ject to a subsisting tenancy. See also tions of the lease, so far as such condi- 
 Field, p. 336 and 337. The question tions are applicable to such tenancy." 
 naturally arises, what would be the ^ Sec. 11. 
 
 position of a present tenant, who •''' Sec. 12. This rent may or may 
 
 changed his yearly tenancy for such a not be subject to revision once in 15 
 
 lease, upon its termination ? In answer years as agreed between landlord and 
 
 to this sec. 10 of the Act provides that tenant. 
 
 " at the expiration of a judicial lease ^ Fixity of tenure was of course also 
 
 made to the tenant of a present tenancy aided by the improved rules for com- 
 
 and for a term not exceeding 60 years, pensation for disturbance. 
 
XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 167 
 
 have been dealt with, therefore, is in short that a tenant under 
 the Act can (1) on an increase of rent being proposed by the 
 landlord and accepted by the tenant, or (2) in the case of a 
 present tenancy without an increase having been proposed, by 
 application to the Court commute his tenancy into a statutory 
 term ; while in the case of leases for more than 31 years, and 
 of fixed tenancies, the agreement of the landlord and tenant 
 without litigation becomes binding \ 
 
 A large equitable power was vested in the Court by the 
 provision^ which enacted that on the hearing of any appli- 
 cation of a landlord or tenant, if the Court was of opinion that 
 the conduct of either party had been unreasonable, the application 
 might be (1) refused, or (2) granted subject to conditions ; and 
 that the offending party might be penalized in costs. The 
 Court also had power, in the case of leases existing at the time 
 of the passing of the Act, where unjust terms had been im- 
 posed upon the tenant on his acceptance of the said lease after 
 the passing of the Act of 1870, to set aside the lease on the 
 application^ of the tenant and place him on the same footing as 
 that occupied by the holder of an ordinary tenancy*. 
 
 It will be remembered that under the Act of 1870 the 
 Board of Works was authorized to advance two-thirds of the 
 price of the holding to a tenant desirous of purchasing, and it 
 has been pointed out that (despite this being increased by 
 
 1 See Field, p. 338. And it should by a written agreement to contract 
 be noticed that by sec. 20, sub-sec. (2), himself out of the operation of either 
 where the landlord resumes possession of the Acts. In another case also 
 of a present tenancy and reinstates the a contract inconsistent with the Acts 
 tenant, such tenancy again becomes is allowed, for by sec. 22, when a hold- 
 subject to the provisions of the Act as ing subject to customary rights has 
 regards present tenancies, and if the been purchased by the landlord by 
 parties agree at the time of the re- voluntary purchase before the Act of 
 instatement as to rent to be paid it 1881, and the owner is in actual occu- 
 becomes a judicial rent. pation ; at the date of the passing of 
 
 2 Sec. 9. the Act then in a first tenancy of 
 2 Such application to be made within the holding subsequently created by 
 
 six months of the passing of the Act of written agreement the tenancy may 
 
 1881. See Field 339, and 44 & 45 be exempted from the provisions of 
 
 Vict. c. 49, sec. 21. sec. 1 as to free sale. 44 & 45 Vict. c. 
 
 ^ But the tenant of a holding of 49, sec. 22. 
 more than £150 annual value was able 
 
168 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. 
 
 the Act of 1872* to two-thirds of the value of the holding) 
 these purchase clauses failed signally. The new purchase 
 clauses of the Act of 1881 also provided for the advance of 
 money to the purchasing tenant, but regulated the advances 
 in a different way. The Land Commission was empowered ^ if 
 satisfied with the security, to advance^ sums to the purchasing 
 tenant to the following amounts. 
 
 1. If the tenant is about to purchase from the landlord 
 for a principal sum — then not more than three-fourths of such 
 sum. 
 
 2. If the tenant purchases by paying a fine and engaging 
 to pay a fee-farm rent — then any sum not exceeding one half of 
 the fine, on condition that the fee-farm rent is not more than 
 seventy-five per cent, of what the Commissioners think a fair 
 rent for the holding. 
 
 And the Act further sought to facilitate sales to the tenants 
 by allowing the Commission under certain conditions to purchase 
 estates from the landlords and to sell them again to the 
 tenants*; and by allowing the Commission to indemnify the 
 tenant purchasers of an incumbered estate against incum- 
 brances ^ 
 
 This then being an outline of the provisions^ of the cele- 
 brated Act of 1881, which again remodelled the whole of the 
 system of agricultural holdings in Ireland, it is possible in 
 the light of after events to detect many flaws and also to 
 observe many good points. The Act, as has been pointed out, 
 was greatly marred for practical purposes by its own subtlety, 
 and in addition the details as to procedure proved at first to 
 work but indifferently, and complaints were made that the 
 judgments as to improvements, etc. by the Commissioners were 
 
 1 35 & 36 Vict. c. 32, sec. 1, sub- until the whole charge was paid off 
 sec. (1). the tenant might not subdivide or let 
 
 2 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 24, sub- his holding without consent. Sec. 30, 
 sec. (1). sub-sec. (1) a. 
 
 3 Such advances to be repaid by an ^ Sec. 26, sub-sec. (1) ; and see 
 annuity in favour of the Land Com- Field, p. 341. 
 
 mission for 35 years of £5 for every ^ Sec. 26, sub. -sec. (5). 
 
 hundred advanced, and so in propor- ^ See post p. 179 note 1 as to provi- 
 
 tion for every less sum, sec. 28 ; and sions for emigration. 
 
XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 169 
 
 not sufficiently specific to set vexed questions finally at 
 rest ^ 
 
 A large amount of criticism was focused on the Act, and 
 various objections to its principle were raised. It was urged 
 that {apart even from what many considered a most unwarrant- 
 able inroad on the rights of the landlord^) a dual ownership was 
 established in the soil, a thing which was termed radically evil. 
 Yet this dual ownership is to be found all over Europe, and 
 Ulster tenant-right presents about the one satisfactory feature 
 of the land history of Ireland. Again, another body of the 
 opponents of the Act deplored the vanished rights of the 
 landlord, which they declared to be now reduced to a rent- 
 charge on his estates. Yet he still possessed the remedies 
 of distress, ejectment, action, and injunction; while he had a 
 right to enter on the tenant's land for the purpose of min- 
 ing, quarrying, hunting', etc.; possessed rights to woods and 
 minerals, held the reversion of the tenant's estate, and had a 
 right every fifteen years to a revision of rent^ It was stated 
 that the principle of the Act was adverse to the making of 
 improvements by the landlord ; but where most of the hold- 
 ings are small, and the works are therefore usually the result 
 of the labour of the tenant, this does not apply as it would 
 in a country where large farms and valuable holdings are 
 the rule^ 
 
 Another class of objections was, that no Government^ 
 machinery could properly value rents, which were purely local 
 matters and could only be settled fairly by persons intimately 
 acquainted with the particular district under consideration; 
 that the landlord would still incur odium by having to resort to 
 eviction on breach of the statutory conditions; that the rent 
 
 1 See Report of Select Committee of ^ gee. 5, sub-sec. (5). 
 
 the House of Lords, 1882. ^ O'Connor Morris, Land Systevi of 
 
 2 And without expressing an opinion Ireland, part ii. L. Q. Revieiv, Janu- 
 as to whether the exigencies of the ary, 1888. 
 
 Irish situation made the recognition of ^ ijjjjj^ 
 
 tenant-rights in the land imperative ^ This objection was urged by Mr 
 
 or not, there is no doubt that his Bonamy Price in his special report on 
 
 rights were largely restricted. the Richmond Commission. 
 
170 THE ACT OF 1881. [CHAP. 
 
 which would be fair from a poor tenant would be too small 
 if paid by a richer one ; and that despite the provisions against 
 subdivision and subletting, the ultimate effect of the Act would 
 be to increase or at least perpetuate ' starvation holdings.' 
 
 In all of these last objections there lies a germ of truth, but 
 none of them were sufficiently developed to cause serious harm, 
 and had the Act succeeded in other ways it would have com- 
 pensated for the smaller evils caused. Unfortunately the pur- 
 chase clauses, which were held the most vital portion of the 
 measure, failed completely. The Select Committee of the House 
 of Lords, which in 1882 examined the working of the Act, cast 
 some light on the reason of this failure \ the evidence tending 
 to show that the Land Commission should be empowered to 
 advance the whole purchase-money'^ of his holding to the tenant 
 to render purchase possible ; the amount which might be ad- 
 vanced under the Act being insufficient. The Committee them- 
 selves^ ascribed the failure of the purchase clauses to the fact, 
 that : — 
 
 1. When a limited owner sold to a tenant the money 
 passed into Chancery, and was invested on the low interest of 
 Government Stock, while the expenses of the process were heavy. 
 
 2. When the land is subject to a quit rent*, all the 
 holdings into which any estate is divided remain liable for it, 
 the Commissioners not being able to apportion, &c. 
 
 3. "Under the present arrangements there is no suffi- 
 cient inducement to the tenant to purchase his holding at any 
 price at which the owner would be likely to sell it;" this 
 arising not so much from the fault of the provisions for pur- 
 chase as from the singularly good position of the tenant of a 
 statutory term. 
 
 1 It must be remembered that this keeping them in Ireland. 
 
 Committee was appointed in the face ^ The Committee suggested that the 
 
 of the opposition of the House of Com- loans should be advanced at 3 per 
 
 mons, and represented practically the cent, or 4 per cent, 
 
 landlord interest. A preliminary re- ^ Preliminary Beport of the Select 
 
 port was published but not a final one. Committee, 1882, Parliamentary Papers 
 
 as the evidence of the sub-commis- Vol. viii. 
 
 sioners working under the Act could * And nearly one-third of the land 
 
 not be obtained, owing to their duties of Ireland was so subject. 
 
XI.] THE ACT OF 1881. 171 
 
 It is undeniable that the efforts of the agitation, which has 
 exerted such an influence on the minds and methods of the 
 Irish peasantry, has been employed rather against the accept- 
 ance by the tenantry of the advantages of the Act, while it 
 has pointedly prevented the working of the provisions for free 
 sale\ As a result the Act of 1881 has failed to allay the 
 popular discontent, and the tenantry have on the whole made 
 scanty use of its provisions. A very large number of applica- 
 tions to fix fair rents'^ have indeed been made, but during the 
 first year of the Act only forty cases of application for judicial 
 leases^ came before the Court, and during the same period only 
 85 tenants made use of the purchase clauses. In some ways 
 this would tend to show that the question of fair rent is the one 
 which tenants regard as being of the most vital importance, and 
 would rather militate against the idea that they are eager to 
 possess the fee of the soil. 
 
 The position of the agricultural tenants in Ireland under the 
 Acts of 1870 and 1881 is certainly remarkable ; for their tenure, 
 which before these Acts was marked by complete uncertainty, 
 has been changed to one in the highest degree favourable to 
 the tenant. The attempt to reconcile law and fact by con- 
 structing statutes on the basis of the ideas and expectations 
 of the tenantry has been carried to a remarkable extent, 
 and the position of the Irish tenant from year to year is 
 absolutely unique in the manner in which it is fenced and 
 protected by legislation, until it greatly resembles a tenancy in 
 perpetuity. Despite the faults which have been pointed out in 
 the Acts of over-subtlety and want of finality, it is hard not to 
 believe that they contain within them the groundwork of a 
 satisfactory settlement of the land question. 
 
 1 See O'Connor Morris, L. Q. Be- applications for fixed tenancies, two of 
 view, 1888. which were withdrawn, while 15 were 
 
 2 See Field, p. 357. No less than pending and three had been granted, 
 80,187 notices to fix being lodged in and the necessary documents sealed." 
 the fiurst year of the Act. See Field, p. 357, from Eeport of the 
 
 3 " Three leases only were executed Irish Land Commissioners of the first 
 and sealed during the year. Twenty year's working of the Act. 
 
CHAPTER XII. 
 Recent Legislation. 
 
 No sooner had the Act of 1881 granted to the Irish tenant 
 a degree of legislative protection unexampled in the history 
 of English law than popular demands again became heard, and 
 it was apparent that instead of solving the agrarian difficulty 
 the Act had but whetted the desire for further concession. Two 
 objects were now aimed at by even the more moderate of the 
 tenants, (1) the abolition of arrears, and (2) the creation of an 
 absolute peasant proprietary. The political complications of 
 1882 are too much concerned with present controversial politics 
 to fall within the scope of this essay. But, whatever the cause, 
 the state of Ireland was most critical. The ' no rent ' agitation 
 which has met with such universal condemnation had been 
 started at the end of 1881; and the following year was marked 
 by a ghastly catalogue of crime, while disorder and disaffection 
 ran riot through the land. 
 
 On the 15th of May 1882 Mr Gladstone introduced to 
 Parliament a Bill dealing with arrears. It had been the 
 complaint of the tenants in Ireland that despite the provisions 
 of the Act of 1881 their liability to eviction had not been 
 lessened owing to the burden of arrears of rent which incumbered 
 them, and they stated that large numbers of evictions on this 
 ground were taking place. On the second reading of the 
 Arrears Bill, Mr Gladstone admitted that the interference of the 
 Legislature with respect to arrears of rent was exceptional and 
 extraordinary ^ and that neither on economic nor constitutional 
 principles could State interference by compulsion and gifts with 
 
 1 Hansard, 3rd series, cclxix. p. 1270. 
 
CHAP. XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 173 
 
 the settlement of debts be advocated^ ; but he urged in favour 
 of the measure that it might prevent the failure'^ of one portion 
 of the Land Act, and on the 18th of August the Arrears Act^ 
 received the Royal Assent. 
 
 This Act was confined in its operation to the tenants of 
 holdings falling within the Act of 1881 and under the value 
 of £30 per annum'*. Its most important provision was, that if 
 it could be proved to the satisfaction of the Land Commission 
 
 (1) that the tenant of such a holding on or before the 30th of 
 November 1882 had paid his rent for the year ending in 1881, 
 
 (2) that antecedent arrears of rent were due by him to the land- 
 lord, and (3) that he could not discharge them without losing his 
 holding or being deprived of the means of duly cultivating it^ an 
 order for payment might be made by the Land Commission to 
 or for the benefit of the landlord of one half of the arrears due 
 (provided that the sum so paid did not exceed the yearly rent to 
 which the holding was liable in the year preceding that ending 
 in 1881). When the order for the payment of such a sum had 
 been made the antecedent arrears were swept away, as also any 
 judgment, decree or security for the rent ; whilst any judgment 
 or decree for the recovery of the holding on the ground of non- 
 payment of rent was vacated as far as regarded any rent due 
 in respect of the holding before the last gale day of the 
 year ending in 1881, but not as regarded rent which had since 
 that date accrued due^. The difference between this Act 
 and the arrears clause of the Act of 1881' is very marked. 
 
 1 See Annual Register, 1882, p. 80. ing as far as appeared reasonable to 
 
 2 Hansard, 3rd series, cclxix. p. the Commissioners taken into account 
 1274, " Without the settlement of this in considering the tenant's power of 
 question I sorrowfully confess that paying, sec. 1, sub-sec. (2). 
 
 the working of the Land Act, however ^ Sec. 1, sub-sec. (2) ; but if the 
 
 beneficial, must remain essentially in- tenancy is sold within seven years the 
 
 complete." arrears dealt with and not satisfied 
 
 2 45 & 46 Vict. c. 47. shall, to an amount not exceeding one 
 
 ^ The number of tenancies in Ireland year of such arrears nor half the pro- 
 
 which would fall under the limit of fits of such a sale, be a sum payable 
 
 the £30 valuation was calculated at to the landlord within the meaning of 
 
 585,000. the Act of 1881. 
 
 5 45 & 46 Vict. 47, sec. 1. The sale- ' 44 & 45 yict. c. 49, sec. 59. When 
 
 able value of the tenant's interest be- advances had already been made under 
 
174 RECENT LEGISLATION. [CHAP. 
 
 The money provided by the Government (and which was 
 supplied from the Irish Church Surplus) was given not as a 
 loan but as a free gift, enforceable by either landlord or tenant. 
 Applications for relief under the Act* were to be made before 
 the end of 1882^ 
 
 Even when aided by the Arrears Act the Act of 1881 did 
 not work satisfactorily; the applications under its purchase 
 clauses were few; and discontent was widely prevalent through- 
 out the Irish agricultural peasantry. The skilful manipulation 
 of political agitators both fostered the existing dissatisfaction 
 and rendered nugatory the working of the Acts. The agri- 
 cultural returns showed increasing depression, and the panacea 
 of a tenant proprietary was widely urged. In 1884 two 
 measures of land purchase were proposed by Mr Barry and 
 Mr Dickson, and though they were rejected a promise was 
 extorted from the Government to introduce a land purchase 
 Bill. This pledge was redeemed by the introduction of Sir 
 George Trevelyan's' scheme of land purchase, proposing an 
 advance of £20,000,000 from the Imperial Exchequer, of which 
 not more than 5,000,000 was to be advanced in any one year. 
 The Bill was based on the idea of twenty years' purchase, 
 and provided (1) that if the tenant would pay a quarter of the 
 purchase-money the other three-quarters should be advanced 
 by the State at such low interest that by the payment of an 
 annual sum, not exceeding his present rent, for forty years he 
 would become the freeholder; while (2) if no principal sum were 
 paid by him the whole of the purchase-money might be advanced 
 
 this section the Commissioners were filed an agreement as to the fair rent 
 empowered by sec. 15 of the Act of of a holding is filed to make an order 
 1882 to abolish the rent-charge on as to the accommodation of the la- 
 proof that tenant was at the time when bourers employed on the holding 
 the advance was made unable to dis- (sec. 3). 
 charge the arrears. 3 Then Mr Trevelyan. When he 
 
 1 Sec. 10, but in certain cases time brought forward the Bill he stated, 
 might be extended to April 30, 1883. " That land in Ireland was almost un- 
 
 2 Another Act of this year, the saleable, the 'block' being as great as 
 Labourers' Cottages and Allotments it was when Sir Robert Peel passed the 
 (Ireland) Act, 1882, 45 & 46 Vict. c. 60, Incumbered Estates Act. " Annual 
 enabled the Land Commissioners, Register, 1884, p. 190 — 192, 
 
 where the landlord and tenant had 
 
XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 175 
 
 at 5 per cent, to be paid for thirty-three years, but in this case 
 he was obliged to satisfy the local board as to security, and a 
 guarantee was expected out of the local cess. 
 
 This Bill, the provisions of which as will be observed were of 
 a most sweeping character, was eventually dropped; but in the 
 following year Lord Ashbourne, the Lord Chancellor for Ireland, 
 introduced the Purchase of Land (Ireland) Act 1885 \ It 
 amended the purchase clauses of the Act of 1881^ by allowing 
 an advance to the tenant of the whole purchase-money of his 
 holding at 4 per cent.'', to run for 49 years; and the protection of 
 a cash guarantee was obtained by the State by the Com- 
 missioners retaining one-fifth of the money till the borrower re- 
 paid of the whole loan a sum equal to such fifth. The sum to 
 be advanced by the State was limited to £5,000,000, and the 
 working of the Act was placed in the hands of the Irish Land 
 Commission ^ 
 
 Four large schemes of land purchase have therefore now 
 been applied to Irish land with the object of enabling occupying 
 tenants to become owners. The proposals of Mr Gladstone for 
 drastic purchase in 1886 are both too much concerned with 
 controversial politics and too unreal in their nature to come 
 within the scope of this essay; but as it is evident how im- 
 portant a feature of the land law of Ireland is concerned in the 
 working of those purchase clauses which have actually resulted 
 in the creation of peasant freeholders, the comparison of the 
 working of the Irish Church Act^ the Bright clauses of the 
 Act of 1870^ the purchase clauses of the Act of 1881'' and 
 Lord Ashbourne's Act® is highly instructive. 
 
 The following table is based on the statement made in the 
 House of Commons on the 19th of November, 1888, by the 
 Solicitor-General for Ireland^ : 
 
 1 48 & 49 Vict. c. 73. 44 & 45 Vict. c. 71. 
 
 2 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49. <5 33 & 34 yict. c. 46. 
 
 3 Instead of three-quarters at 5 per 7 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49. 
 cent. 8 48 & 49 Vict. c. 73. 
 
 * Power being given to appoint two ^ ^r Madden, see Hansard, 3rd 
 
 new Commissioners, sec. 17. series, Vol. 330, pp. 1520—1531. 
 
 5 32 & 33 Vict. c. 42, amended by 
 
176 
 
 RECENT LEGISLATION. 
 
 [chap. 
 
 No. of Purchasers. Amount advanced. 
 
 6,000 £1,674,000' 
 
 824 518,716 
 
 Land Act, 1881 731 240,554 
 
 Lord Ashbourne's Act' (1885) 8,632 5,986,000'. 
 
 Act. 
 Irish Church Act 
 Land Act, 1870 
 
 It will be observed that Lord Ashbourne's Act has been by far 
 the most effectual. Its success indeed was considerably greater 
 than is shown by the above figures, since the hands of the 
 Commissioners were tied by the limitation of the funds at 
 their disposal, and 5,706 transactions under its provisions were 
 still pending. The total number of agreements for purchase 
 signed being 14,338. 
 
 Two more tables, based on the same authority, will show 
 respectively the nature of the farms already bought under this 
 Act, and the distribution of the peasant proprietors established 
 throughout Ireland under its provisions. 
 
 1. Nature of Farms created. 
 
 Rental. No. of Holdings 
 
 purchased. 
 
 Underlie 3,599 
 
 Between £10 and £30 3,234 
 
 £30 and £50 884 
 
 Over £50 
 
 915 
 
 2. Distribution of 
 
 Applications. 
 
 Ulster . 
 
 7,711 
 
 Munster 
 
 2,730 
 
 Leinster 
 
 2,336 
 
 Connaught 
 
 1,561 
 
 From these figures it is evident that Lord Ashbourne's Act 
 has been largely successful in inducing the tenants to purchase 
 their holdings: and its further extension by another grant of 
 £5,000,000, which seems certain to pass the present session of 
 Parliament, will doubtless greatly facilitate the process \ 
 
 1 The figures in this case represent 
 the gross amount of the purchase- 
 money; the amount advanced would 
 be about three-quarters of the gross 
 amount. 
 
 2 Figures brought up to Oct. 31, 
 1888. 
 
 3 This sum does not represent the 
 money which had then been actually 
 
 advanced — Lord Ashbourne's Act only 
 empowered the grant of £5,000,000 — 
 but the sum actually advanced plus 
 the sum which would be necessary to 
 meet the pending transactions, 5,706 
 in number. 
 
 4 Since the above was written this 
 grant has been passed by 51 & 52 Vict, 
 c. 49. 
 
XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 177 
 
 The principle of a peasant proprietary seems now to be 
 generally held to be the best solution of the Irish land question, 
 and the gradual buying out of the interest of the landlords to 
 be considered likely to benefit that country. For many years 
 this has been the dream of not a few of those interested in 
 Ireland, and the theory of compulsory purchase was favoured 
 by MilP; but while expressing the opinion with much reserve, 
 owing to the weighty authorities in favour of the scheme, the 
 author of this essay is very doubtful of the ultimate advantages 
 of the system. That in the immediate present it works well 
 is true, and the tenants certainly seem to become more pros- 
 perous and more peaceable when settled upon holdings of 
 which they are themselves the proprietors. The banishment 
 of capital, however, entailed by a widespread application of the 
 scheme, and the improvident habits of the Irish peasantry (so 
 different from those of the French small holders who are always 
 appealed to as a triumphant example) offer fatal objections 
 to the ultimate success of a universal plan of this kind in 
 Ireland. 
 
 The following extract from Mr Kavanagh's special report 
 on the Bessborough Commission shows most forcibly the evil 
 possibilities of such a plan : 
 
 " Examples of the old perpetuity leases have been given us 
 in evidence, where the lessees holding on grants for ever at a 
 nominal rent, have been, so far as the question is practically con- 
 cerned, in the same position as owners in fee ; and the condition 
 of those properties now has been cited as exemplifying what the 
 result of peasant proprietors would be, and if they can be taken 
 as a fair example of what the result of a future experiment 
 in that direction would result in, I think that even the most 
 ardent advocate of that scheme would not consider it as en- 
 couraging. By the evidence it is shown that very few of the 
 representatives of the original lessees are now in possession ; 
 ruined by idleness and extravagance, their grants soon passed 
 into the hands of mortgagees, who, looking only to gain, let 
 and sublet, divided and subdivided their lands, till over-popu- 
 
 1 See England and Ireland, J. S. fication of Ireland examined, by Lord 
 Mill, and Mr MilVs plan for the pad- Dufferin, 1868. 
 
 M. 12 
 
178 RECENT LEGISLATION. [CHAP. 
 
 lation with its consequent ills of never-ceasing want and 
 periodical famine were stereotyped in those districts, and even 
 in the few instances which remain of the representatives of 
 the original lessees still continuing in possession, the condition 
 is no better. It is shown that as occasion arose for each owner 
 to make provision for his family, the same course was adopted, 
 till the successive increase of each generation reduced the 
 holdings to a size utterly inadequate to the support of those 
 depending on them for even a bare subsistence \" 
 
 The author inclines to the opinion that a sweeping measure 
 of land purchase would be, at any rate in its ultimate result, 
 an evil ; and is of opinion that the true solution of the diffi- 
 culty lies rather in statutory terms such as those created under 
 the Act of 1881. They constitute a severe inroad on the rights 
 of the landlord, but they do not forcibly banish him from the 
 land, nor do they compel him (as a compulsory land purchase 
 system would do) either to retain his house and grounds while 
 shorn 'of his estate, or to sell his demesne at something not 
 much above prairie value. Moreover, they constitute a real 
 approximation of law and fact, the statutory term resembling 
 very much the nature of the tenants' assumed rights in the 
 soil. 
 
 If the country were freed from the bondage of the gigantic 
 organization of disaffection ; if the Irish Land Acts of 1870, 
 1881 and 1887 were cleared of their technicalities and re- 
 enacted in the form of one shorter and simpler Act ; and if 
 the modes of procedure were simplified and cheapened, the 
 author believes that the question of agricultural tenures would 
 be on the high-road to settlement. While if public money were 
 freely granted in aid of drainage and other improvements of 
 the land^, and (though with caution) in the creation of a 
 limited, solvent and industrious class of peasant proprietors, 
 and in aid of improved provisions for emigration (free from 
 the faults which characterized these provisions in the Act of 
 1881, and which the provisions inserted in the Arrears Act 
 
 1 Report of Bessborough Commis- Bills now before Parliament are ex- 
 sion, p. 62. amples of this kind of legislation, and 
 
 2 The light railway and drainage should be widely beneficial. 
 
XII.] BECENT LEGISLATION. 179 
 
 did not satisfactorily mend*), the system would be greatly 
 facilitated. It is impossible to say that the Act of 1881 has 
 been tried under fair conditions, and the Act of 1887 is yet 
 new. 
 
 This latter Act^ was introduced to the House of Lords by 
 the Earl of Cadogan^, who touched on the report presented by 
 the Commission on the Act of 1881*, and stated that the 
 Government was averse to again disturb more than was neces- 
 sary the law of Irish land tenure. The provisions of the Act 
 extended to leaseholders the advantages from which they were 
 excluded under the Act of 1881. All such leaseholders — some 
 150,000 — were enabled, if they desired, to apply to the Court 
 and to ask for a judicial revision of rent ; that is, they were 
 placed in the same position as the tenants of 'present tenan- 
 cies' under the Act of 1881 ^ A difference was also made in 
 the position of middlemen, who were enabled, if the Court 
 reduced the rents paid by their tenants, under certain cir- 
 cumstances to give up their leases®. By the Act of 1881' a 
 middleman who was not in occupation, and hence could not 
 claim the protection of the Act, was frequently, while liable for 
 his own rent, injured by his tenants having fair rents fixed as 
 against him. This state of affairs was also prejudicial to the 
 sub-tenants, since if the middleman made default and the head 
 landlord proceeded by ejectment, the tenants were only able to 
 save themselves from eviction by paying the head rent in full, 
 and though they could then proceed against the middleman, 
 this was not a privilege of much valued 
 
 In order to stop the evictions^ which had become so pain- 
 
 1 The Act of 1881 (sec. 32) enabled ^ March 31st, 1887, see Hansard, 3rd 
 the Land Commission to enter into series, Vol. 313, pp. 1 — 27. 
 agreements with persons representing a ^ Lord Cowper's Commission, ap- 
 State, Colony or public body, but the pointed 29th Sept. 1886. 
 applications which were received did ^ 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 1. 
 
 not fulfil these conditions. The Ar- « 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8. 
 
 rears Act 1882 empowered Boards of ^ 44 & 45 Vict. c. 49, sec. 57. 
 
 Guardians to raise money for helping « Key to the Land Act, 1887, T. M. 
 
 emigration, and sanctioned grants to Healy, pp. 57, 60. 
 
 them for this purpose. See Field, pp. » Whether the provisions introduced 
 
 353, 354. were likely to have this effect is rather 
 
 2 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33. doubtful, but that this was the belief 
 
 12—2 
 
180 RECENT LEGISLATION. [CHAP. 
 
 fully prevalent, the Act of 1887 contained a provision which 
 will be better understood if the state of the then law of eject- 
 ment is briefly considered. The tenant under a lease, or holding 
 a yearly tenancy, was liable to eviction when one year's rent 
 was in arrear. The fact that a judgment or decree in eject- 
 ment had been obtained did not however get rid of the 
 tenant's claim to his holding until such judgment or decree 
 was actually executed ; until then, and also for six months 
 after such execution, the tenant was able to redeem his holding 
 if he paid the landlord's costs and the rent due\ It was there- 
 fore necessary, in order that the six months during which the 
 tenant had an equity of redemption might begin to run, for the 
 landlord to proceed to actual eviction, even if the tenant was 
 afterwards to be re-admitted as a care-taker. The provisions 
 of the Act of 1887^^ made it sufficient for the landlord to serve 
 notice of the judgment, and ipso facto, on receipt of the notice, 
 the tenant became a mere care-taker without having been 
 evicted, and the six months' period of redemption began to 
 run. Certain equitable provisions were also inserted, enabling 
 the County Court to give time to the tenants to help them to 
 meet their liabilities. 
 
 The Act of 1887 is but an extension of the Act of 1881, 
 and there appears no doubt that the admission of leaseholders 
 to the benefit of its provisions is a step in the right di- 
 rection. Certain temporary changes in the judicial rents 
 were also provided for. One of the recommendations of Earl 
 Cowper's commission had been that a shorter period than 
 fifteen years should be fixed for the revision of the judicial 
 rents. There were many obvious disadvantages in so soon 
 unhinging again the settlements of judicial rents which had 
 been effected under the Act of 1881, at the same time the 
 unforeseen and calamitous agricultural depression of 1885 and 
 the following years, which caused even the judicial rents to be 
 
 and intention of the Government was posed provision will be to reduce the 
 
 stated by the Earl of Cadogan, who number of evictions by one-half." 
 
 when introducing the Bill said, "I do Hansard, 3rd series. Vol. 313, p. 13. 
 
 not think I am overstating the case ^ 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154, sees. 52 — 71. 
 
 when I say that the effect of the pro- ^ 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 7. 
 
XII.] RECENT LEGISLATION. 181 
 
 impossible to the tenants, rendered some action imperative. 
 The Act of 1887 dealt with the difficulty by providing for a 
 temporary re-adjustment of the judicial rents. The Land 
 Commission was directed to determine the necessary change 
 for the current year, and to take similar steps in 1888 and 
 1889 \ It seems probable that if an amount of social order 
 can be introduced into Ireland sufficient to give the Act a fair 
 trial, that it should ultimately be successful. 
 
 All remedial measures which are only adopted in a crisis 
 of social disunion are likely to be at first only slightly suc- 
 cessful ; but it is probable that if a quieter future is in store 
 for Ireland, the tenants will realise that they possess a security 
 in their holdings which is quite unexampled, and that the 
 troubled sea of Irish passions should gradually calm. Works 
 of improvement, the increased development of the soil, and 
 the help of State-aided emigration may all have to be called 
 into play before the quiet level is reached, but it would seem 
 that the basis of tenure has been satisfactorily dealt with. 
 
 Surely it is no baseless hope that on the horizon is seen 
 the dawning flush of a day of peace for Ireland; that the 
 future holds years of happiness and prosperity when that lovely 
 land, shaking off like a dark cloud the past of misery, blood- 
 shed and despair, may take that place in the roll of countries 
 which the talent, the genius, the wit and the learning of 
 her sons so well entitle her to. 
 
 1 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33, sec. 30. The end of which time the tenants will be 
 power of varying the judicial rent was liable to the original judicial rent for 
 only given for these three years, at the the remainder of the statutory term. 
 
LIST OF STATUTES CITED. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 13 Edw. I. (Stat. West, the 2nd) 49 
 
 31 Edw. m. St. 4 51 
 
 Statute of Kilkenny, 1367 52, 53 
 
 2Kic. III. c. 8 43 
 
 10 Hen. Vn. c. 4 (Irish) 55 
 
 „ „ c. 8 (Irish) ib. 
 
 „ „ c. 10 (Irish) 56 
 
 „ „ c. 18 (Irish) . . . ib. 
 
 „ „ c. 22 . ib. 
 
 34 Hen. VIII. c. 28 68 
 
 12 Eliz. c. 4 (Irish) 62, 71 
 
 13 Jac. I. c. 5 (Irish) 76 
 
 ICar. I. c. 33 . 34 
 
 16 Car. 1. c. 33 ib. 
 
 „ „ S.9 92 
 
 12 Car. II. c. 24 82 
 
 13 & 14 Car. II. c. 18 85 
 
 14 & 15 Car. II. c. 2 (Act of Settlement) 81 
 
 14 & 15 Car. II. sess. 4, c. 19 (Irish) 82 
 
 17 & 18 Car. H. c. 2 81 
 
 29 Car. H. c. 3 88 
 
 3 Will. & Mary c. 2 85 
 
 7 Will. III. sess. 1, c. 12 (Irish) 87 
 
 7 Will. III. c. 21 (Irish) 84 
 
 9 Will. III. c. 3 (Irish) 86 
 
 10 Will. III. c. 6 (Irish) 108 
 
 10 & 11 Will. III. c. 10 85 
 
 11 & 12 Will. III. c. 2 (Act of Eesumption) 84 
 
 2 Anne c. 3 (Irish) 86 
 
 „ c. 6 (Irish) ib. 
 
 11 Anne c. 2 sec. 6 128 
 
 5 Geo. II. 0. 4 sec. 1 (Irish) 131 
 
LIST OF STATUTES CITED. 183 
 
 PAGE 
 
 25 Geo. II. c. 13 sec. 2 (Irish) . . . . . .- . . .131 
 
 11 & 12 Geo. III. 0. 21 (Irish) . 97 
 
 17 & 18 Geo. III. c. 49 (Irish) . . . . . . . . . i6. 
 
 21 & 22 Geo. III. c. 48 (Irish) 92 
 
 39 & 40 Geo. III. c. 67 (Act of Union) 103 
 
 56 Geo. III. c. 88 (Eviction Act 1816) 100, 131 
 
 4 Geo. IV. c. 99 sec. 35 93, 95 
 
 7 Geo. IV. c. 29 100 
 
 10 Geo» IV. c. 8 ib. 
 
 11 & 12 Vict. c. 48 (Incumbered Estates Act 1848) .... Ill, 149 
 
 sec. 2 112 
 
 13 & 14 Vict. c. 69 .101 
 
 14 & 15 Vict. c. 25 sec. 3 . 129 
 
 „ „ c. 57 sec. 73 (Civil Bills, Ireland, Act) 131 
 
 21 & 22 Vict. c. 72 (Irish Landed Estates Act 1858) 112 
 
 23 & 24 Vict. c. 153 130 
 
 „ „ sec. 36 ib. 
 
 „ „ sec. 39 ib, 
 
 „ ,, sec. 40 ib. 
 
 „ „ sec. 44 ib. 
 
 „ „ sec. 62 ib. 
 
 23 & 24 Vict. c. 154 (Act of 1860) ....... 124—134 
 
 sec. 3 127 
 
 sec. 12, 13, 14 . . . . . . . .128 
 
 sec. 17 129 
 
 sec. 40 130 
 
 sec. 51 131 
 
 sec. 52 131, 180 
 
 sec. 53 132 
 
 32 & 33 Vict. c. 42 (Irish Church Disestablishment) . . . 135, 175 
 
 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46 (Act of 1870) ib. 
 
 sec. 3 . . . . 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 164 
 sec. 4 149, 150 
 
 „ sec. 5 151 
 
 „ sec. 6 ib. 
 
 sec. 7 . . . • 149 
 
 sec. 9 . 137, 143 
 
 „ sec. 10 ......... 144 
 
 sec. 12 144, 148 
 
 sec. 13 . . •. . . . . . .145 
 
 „ sec. 14 144 
 
 sec. 15 136 
 
 sec. 20 148 
 
 sec. 32 151, 152 
 
 sec. 34 153 
 
 sec. 36 164 
 
 sec. 40 ih. 
 
184 
 
 LIST OF STATUTES CITED. 
 
 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46 sec. 41 . . 
 
 ,, „ sees. 44, 45 . 
 
 „ „ sec. 69 
 
 „ ,, sec. 71 
 
 35 & 36 Vict. c. 32 sec. 1 (Act of 1872) 
 
 „ „ „ sub-sec. (1) 
 
 44 cSr 45 Vict. c. 49 (Act of 1881) 
 
 „ ,, sec. 1 . 
 
 „ sub-sec. (1), (2), (3), (4), (6), (7), (9), (15), (16) 
 „ sub-sec. (8), (11), (12), (13) 
 „ sec. 2 .... 
 
 ,, „ sec. 4 sub-sec. (1) 
 
 ,, „ ,, sub-sec. (2) 
 
 „ ,, ,, sub-sec. (3) 
 
 sec. 5 
 
 ,, „ ,, sub-sec. (5) 
 
 „ „ sec. 6 
 
 sec. 7 
 
 sec. 8 sub-sec. (1), (3), (5), (6), (8) 
 
 ,, „ sec. 9 
 
 ,, „ sees. 10, 11, 12 . . . 
 
 „ „ sec. 13 sub-sec. (1) 
 
 ,, ,, „ sub-sec. (3) b . 
 
 „ „ „ sub-sec. (6) 
 
 „ „ „ sub-sec. (2) 
 
 „ „ sec. 20 sub-sec. (4) 
 
 „ „ sees. 21, 22 . 
 
 „ „ sec. 24 sub-sec. (1) 
 
 „ „ sec. 26 sub-sees. (1), (5) 
 
 ,, „ sec. 30 sub-sec. (1) a . 
 
 sec. 67 
 
 sec. 58 
 
 „ ,, sec. 59 
 
 44 & 45 Vict. c. 71 (Irish Churcla Amendment Act) 
 
 45 & 46 Vict. c. 47 (Arrears Act) 
 
 sec. 1 
 
 „ „ ,, sub-sec. (2) 
 
 sec. 15 
 
 45 & 46 Vict. c. 60 sec. 3 (Labourers' Cottages and Allotments 
 
 1882) .... 
 48 & 49 Vict. c. 73 (Lord Ashbourne's Act 1885) 
 
 50 & 51 Vict. c. 33 (Act of 1887) 
 
 „ „ sees. 1, 8 
 
 „ „ sec. 7 . 
 
 „ „ sec. 30 . 
 
 51 & 62 Vict. c. 49 . 
 
 PAGE 
 
 151, 152 
 153 
 148 
 136 
 153 
 168 
 175 
 160, 161, 167 
 
 160, 
 
 Ireland Act 
 
 161 
 162 
 161 
 162 
 166 
 163 
 
 162, 166 
 169 
 163 
 164 
 165 
 167 
 166 
 164 
 
 163, 165 
 163 
 167 
 163 
 167 
 168 
 
 lb. 
 
 ib. 
 162, 179 
 160 
 173 
 175 
 173 
 
 ib, 
 
 ib. 
 174 
 
 ib. 
 175 
 179 
 
 ib. 
 180 
 181 
 176 
 
PATENT AND CLOSE ROLLS, ETC. 185 
 
 PATENT AND CLOSE KOLLS, ETC. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Eecord 4 Edw. II . 50 
 
 Close Koll 2 Edw. Ill 44 
 
 Close EoU 15 Edw. Ill .51 
 
 Close Koll 28 Edw. Ill 44 
 
 EoU of King's Council in Ireland 16 Eic. II 92 
 
 Writ 11 Hen. Ill 49 
 
 Close Eoll 37 Hen III 44 
 
 Patent Eoll 40 Hen. Ill 49 
 
 Patent Eoll 7 Hen. IV 53 
 
 Patent Eoll 10 Hen. IV ib. 
 
 Close Eoll 9 Hen. V 54 
 
 Close Eoll 7 Hen. VI ib. 
 
 Close Eoll 14 Hen. VI ib. 
 
 Patent and Close Eolls of Chancery in Ireland 24 & 25 Hen. VIH. . . 69 
 
INDEX. 
 
 Abolition of military tenures, 82 
 
 Absenteeism, 53, 59, 82, 92, 93, 96, 103 
 
 Adrian IV., Bull of Pope, 41 
 
 Advances to tenants , under Irish Church 
 Act, 135, 153 (note), 175, 176; under 
 Act of 1870, 153, 175, 176 ; under 
 Act of 1881, 167, 168, 175, 176; under 
 Lord Ashbourne's Act, 175, 176 
 
 Adventurers, 79, 81 
 
 Agnatic family, 3 
 
 Agrarian community, ibid. 
 
 Aicill, Book of, 20 
 
 Aires, 15, 16, 18 
 
 Alexander III., Bull of Pope, 47 
 
 Alienation of land, 12, 13, 30; influence 
 of the Church on, in early times, 13, 
 32 ; mode of, in the Brehon Law, 30 
 
 Anti-rent agitation, 156, 157 
 
 Arrears Act 1882, 172, 173 
 
 Ashbourne's, Lord, Act, 175 
 
 Bacon, Lord, 74 (note) 
 
 Ballybetagh, 70 (note) 
 
 Bank deposits, growth of, 124 
 
 Bastards, could inherit under the Bre- 
 hon Law, 35, 41 ; could not inherit 
 under Kentish Gavelkind, 68 
 
 Bestigi, 25 
 
 Bedford, Duke of, 96 
 
 Belfast, exports from, 156 
 
 Bessborough Commission, 127 (note), 
 143 (note), 157, 159 
 
 Betaghes, 26 
 
 Black rent, 53 
 
 Bo-Aires, 15, 16, 18 
 
 Bogland, reclamation of, permitted to 
 Catholics, 97 
 
 Bonaght, 37 
 
 Bothacks, 16, 18 
 
 Boyne, battle of the, 83 
 
 Brehons, 19 ; authority of the, 20 
 
 Brehon Law, 19 ; translations of, by 
 Commissioners, 20, 21 ; date of, 21, 
 22 ; resembles the laws of Wales, 22 ; 
 not a code, 22 ; how far binding, 23 ; 
 ambiguity of terms in, 24 ; prohibi- 
 tion of, 52; what would have been 
 the effect of the recognition of the, 67 
 
 Bright Clauses of the Act of 1870, 136, 
 151—155 
 
 Bruce, expedition of, 50 
 
 de Burgh, Bichard, receives grant of 
 Connaught, 50 
 
 Cain Aigillne, 28 
 
 Cain Serrath, ibid. 
 
 Canting of tithes, 95 
 
 Cashel, Synod of, 43 
 
 Cathal, 49 
 
 Catholic Church, power of, 113, 114 
 
 Catholics, massacre by, 77, 78; op- 
 pressed by Penal Code, 80 
 
 Cattle, importance of, in early commu- 
 nity, 4, 10, 11 
 
 Ceiles, 16, 18 
 
 Cess, 37 
 
 Charles II. , restoration of, 80 ; Irish 
 Land Commission of, 81 ; abolition 
 of knight service in the reign of, 82 
 
 Charter, Irish, 49 
 
INDEX. 
 
 187 
 
 Chichester, Sir Arthur, 74 (note) 
 Chief, increase in the power of the, 7 ; 
 election of, 8, 30, 31 ; seigniory of, 
 over the tribe-lands, 9 ; exactions 
 by, 29, 35 — 38 ; and tenant, connec- 
 tion of, in Brehon Law, 69 
 Church, relation of the, to land in the 
 Brehon Law, 13, 14, 32 ; tenants in 
 Brehon Law, 32 ; structure of, in 
 Brehon Law, resembles tribe, 32, 33 
 Colony of the Pale, influence of the, 
 on Brehon Law, 4; origin of the 
 term, 55 
 Commendation, mental, 23, 24 
 Commercial Code, 84—87, 90, 95, 97 
 
 Commissions, Land, under James I., 
 71, 77; for making shires in 1605, 
 73 ; under WilHam III., 83 
 
 Commons, origin of, 33, 34 ; enclosure 
 of, 94—96 
 
 Compensation, for disturbance, 137, 
 138, 142—149, 163, 164; for im- 
 provements, see Improvements 
 
 Connaught, surrender of two-thirds of, 
 by Cathal to John, 49 ; granted to 
 Richard de Burgh, ibid. ; composition 
 of, 62 ; scheme of plantation in, 77 
 
 Constantine, forged donation of, 41 
 (note) 
 
 Contract, basis of Act of 1860, 126— 
 128 ; freedom of, impossible in Ire- 
 land, 126, 127; mercantile system 
 of, under Act of 1860, 133, 134 
 
 Copyhold, 90—92 
 
 Cork, claims to lands in, in reign of 
 Elizabeth, 60 
 
 Corus Bescna, 21 
 
 Coshering, 27, 29, 37, 43 
 
 Cottrell, John, 37 (note) 
 
 de Courcy, 48 
 
 Courts Baron, 44 (note), 92 
 
 Court of Claims, 81 
 
 Cowper, Earl, Land Commission of, 
 179, 180 
 
 Coyne, 27, 29, 43, 82 
 
 Crith Gabhlach, 20 
 
 Cromer, Archbishop of Armagh, 59 
 (note) 
 
 Cromwell, character of his Irish wars, 
 59 ; settlement of Ireland under, 78, 
 80 ; conquest of Ireland by, 78, 79 
 
 Cuddies, 37 
 
 Customary tenures, absence of, 26 
 
 Daer tenancy, 10 ; riiles of, 28 — 30 
 
 Davels, Henry, 60 
 
 Davies, Sir John, 24, 67, 70—72, 80, 
 
 89 ; abolition of Irish tenures by, 
 
 67 et seq. 
 Deirbhfine, 25 
 Deis lands, 24, 25 
 Dergfine, 26 (note) 
 Desmond, Sir John, 60 ; revolt of Earl 
 
 of, 60 
 Devon Commission, 107 (note), 118, 
 
 121 (note), 136 
 Dibad, 25 
 
 Disgavelling of Irish land, 73 et seq. 
 Distress, 10, 98, 99, 131 
 Disturbance, compensation for, see 
 
 Compensation 
 Drogheda, Statute of, 55 
 Druids, 19 
 Druim Gall, 21 
 Dufferin, Lord, 19 (note) 
 Duthaig-fine, 25 
 
 Earth-tillers, treatment of, under Crora- 
 wellian Settlement, 80, 89, 90 
 
 Edgecombe, Sir Richard, 55 
 
 Edward IV., policy of, towards de- 
 generate lords, 51 
 
 Ejectment, caused by political motives, 
 94 ; remedy by, 131, 132, 163, 164, 
 179, 180 
 
 EHzabeth, character of Irish wars of, 
 69 ; dealings with Irish land in early 
 part of reign of, 60, 71 
 
 Emigration, 97, 110, 121 
 
 Eric composition, 36, 43 
 
 Escheat in relation to Gavelkind, 73 
 
 Eviction Act 1816, 100, 107, 131 (note) 
 
 Exactions by Chief, 29, 35, 38; had 
 their origin in increase of Fuidhir 
 tenants, 38 
 
188 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Family group, nature of, 3, 4, 5 ; rela- 
 tion of, to the land, 4, 5 
 Famine, of 1739, 99 ; of 1846, 108—110 
 Fair rent, 165 
 Fenianism, 110, 113 
 Feudal tenures, introduction of, 40, 
 
 41; swept away by Act of 1860, 127, 
 
 128 
 Fine, 5 
 
 Fine Flatha, 17, 18 
 Fines on renewal of lease, 96 
 Fitz Thomas, 37 (note) 
 Fixed tenancies, 166 
 Fixtures, removable, law of, under 
 
 Acts of 1851 and 1860, 129 
 Flaths, 15, 16, 18 
 Forfeitures from adherents of James 
 
 n., 83 
 Fostering, 51, 52 (note) 
 Franchise, elective, denied to Papists, 
 
 85 ; effect of nature of, on tenancies, 
 
 94, 99, 100, 107 
 Free sale, provisions for, under Act of 
 
 1881, 160, 161 
 Free trade in land, 124—134 
 Freeholds, growth of, from political 
 
 motives, 100, 104 
 French Code, compared to Act of 1860, 
 
 133, 134 
 Fuidhirs, origin of class, 9 ; Saer and 
 
 Daer, 17, 18 
 
 Gavelkind, Case of, 35 ; Irish, 6, 7, 35 ; 
 
 judgment in the Case of, 67, 68 ; 
 
 Kentish, difference from Irish, 68; 
 
 Welsh, ibid. 
 Geraldines, 47, 59 
 Gilleninny, 37 
 Gillycone, ibid. 
 Grad Feine, 18 ; Flath, ibid. 
 Grattan, 97 
 Grazing farms, 93 
 
 Hanging gale, 105 
 
 Hearts of Steel, 96 
 
 Henry II., agreement of, with Strong- 
 bow, 42; early designs on Ireland, 
 ibid. ; lands in Ireland, 43 ; holds 
 
 Curia Kegis at Lismore, ibid. ; grant 
 of the English laws by, ibid. ; Irish 
 policy of, 46, 47; large grants of 
 land by, 44, 48; makes Treaty of 
 Windsor, 46; makes John King of 
 Ireland, 47 
 
 Henry III., feudal grants by, 49 
 
 Henry IV., state of Ireland in reign of, 
 53 
 
 Henry V., indifference of, towards Ire- 
 land, 53, 64 
 
 Henry VI., state of Ireland in reign of, 
 51 
 
 Henry VII., policy of, towards Ireland, 
 55, 56 
 
 Henry VIII., policy of, 58, 59; state of 
 Ireland in reign of, 57, 58 
 
 Houghers, 94 
 
 House of Lords, Select Committee of, 
 169 (note), 170 
 
 Hy Neill, 31 
 
 larfine, 25 
 
 Improvements, Brehon Law of, 128; 
 law of, under Act of 1860, 128, 130; 
 compensation for, under Act of 1870, 
 149, 151; under Act of 1881, 161, 
 162, 164 
 
 Incumbered Estates Act, 111 — 113, 125, 
 137, 149; landlords under, 124; 
 purchasers under, 125 
 
 Indfine, 25 
 
 India, joint family in, 3 
 
 Insurrection and massacre by Catho- 
 lics, 77, 78 
 
 Irish Church Act, 135, 153 (note) 
 
 James I., Land Commissions in reign 
 of, 71, 75; conciliatory tone of legis- 
 lation of, 76 
 
 James II., policy of, towards Ireland, 
 82, 83; heads Catholic party in 
 Ireland, 83 
 
 John, made King of Ireland, 47 ; goes 
 to Ireland, 48; feudal grants by, 
 ibid. ; agreement of, with Cathal, 
 49; visits Ireland for second time, 
 ibid. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 189 
 
 Joint family of India, 3 
 Judicial rents, 165. 180. 
 
 181 
 
 Kernetty, 37 
 Kilkenny, Statute of, 52 
 Kinship, as basis of early community, 
 3,6 
 
 de Lacy, Hugh, obtains grant of 
 Meath, 44 
 
 Land, arable, 24, 34, 35; bonds, 79; 
 free trade in, 124; League, 157; 
 measures, Irish, 70 (note) ; pasture, 
 24, 33, 34 ; relation of mere Irish 
 to the, after Cromwell's conquest, 
 89 ; system, earliest form of, 3, 4 
 
 Land Act 1870, 134—155; objects of, 
 136; faults of, 138, 139, 145, 147, 
 153—155 
 
 Land Act 1881, 156—171; law of im- 
 provements under, 161, 164; statu- 
 tory terms, 162, 163; compensation 
 for disturbance, 163 ; regulations as 
 to fair rent, 165 ; fixed tenancies, 
 166 ; equitable power of Court, 167 ; 
 advances under, 167, 168 ; purchase 
 clauses of, 168, 170 
 
 Land Act 1887, 178, 179 
 
 Landed Estates Act, 112, 134 
 
 Landholding classes in early times, 
 15—18 
 
 Landlord and Tenant Law Amend- 
 ment Act (Ireland) 1860, 124—134 
 
 Leases, became unpopular with land- 
 lords, 100, 101, 105; refused to 
 settlers, 87 ; refused to Catholics, 
 86 ; judicial, 166, 171 
 
 Levellers, 34, 95 
 
 Licenses, 43 (note), 53 (note) 
 
 Limerick, Treaty of, 83 
 
 Livery, 27, 29 
 
 Livery of seisin, 87 
 
 London Companies as landowners, 
 126 (note) 
 
 Mac Bryan, Murrough, 69 
 Mac Murrough, Dermot, 42 
 Manaich tenants, 32 
 
 Manorial system, how tried in Ireland, 
 
 91,92 
 Manufactures, Irish, repression of, 84, 
 
 85, 90, 93; increase of, 98 
 Meath, ancient appanage of Irish 
 
 Koyalty, 42 ; granted to Hugh de 
 
 Lacy, 44 
 Mensal lands, 10, 30, 31 
 Merchant Navigation Act 1663, 85 
 Middlemen, 82, 93, 96, 98, 124, 148, 
 
 179 
 Mortuath, 18 
 Mosyorowne, 37 
 Mountjoy, 63 
 Munster, desolation of, after Desmond 
 
 war, 60; enclosure of commons in, 
 
 94 ; plantation of, 60, 61 
 
 ' No rent' agitation, 172 
 Notices to quit, 127, 132, 163 
 
 Oak boys, 96 
 
 O'Callaghan, Cahir, 69 
 
 O'Connell, 107, 118 
 
 O'Connor, Roderick, King of Con- 
 naught, 42 ; makes Treaty of Wind- 
 sor with Henry II., 46 
 
 O'Donnell, revolt of, 62, 63 
 
 O'Neil, Hugh, Earl of Tyrone, revolt 
 of, 62 ; forfeiture of estates of, 63, 73 
 
 Orkney, Lady, 84 (note) 
 
 Ormonde, Earl of, 92 
 
 Ownership, changes in nature of, 7 
 
 Oxford, Council at, 47 
 
 Palatine counties, grants of, 45, 92 
 Pandarus, 59 (note) 
 Papists, disabilities heaped on, 86 
 Parliament, Grattan's, 98; Papists 
 
 prevented from sitting in, 85 
 Peel, Sir Eobert, 118 
 Penal Code, 86, 87, 90, 95 
 Pembroke, Richard de Clare, Earl of, 
 
 see Strongbow 
 Petition, to Edward I. from Colonists 
 
 of the Pale, 50; to Henry V. from 
 
 Colonists of the Pale, 54 
 Petty, Sir William, 79, 80, 89, 90 
 
100 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Placita Kolls, 50 (note) 
 
 Plantation of Munster, 60, 61 ; Ulster, 
 63, 64, 73—75 
 
 Population, increase of, 102, 103 
 
 Potato, effect of cultivation of, 99, 103 ; 
 famine, 108—110 
 
 Potkyn's Case, 105 
 
 Poyning's Law, 55 
 
 Property in land, at first vested in the 
 Community, 3 ; mere usufruct by in- 
 dividual, ibid. ; Gavelkind rules of, 
 6 ; power of the chief as affecting, 8 ; 
 rules of Tanistry as affecting, ibid. 
 
 Protestants, massacre of, in 1641, 77, 
 78 
 
 Purchase, land, schemes of, 174, 177, 
 178 
 
 Purchases, under Incumbered Estates 
 Act, 125; under Irish Church Act, 
 135, 153 (note), 175, 176; under Act 
 of 1870, 151—155, 175, 176; under 
 Act of 1881, 168, 170, 175, 176; under 
 Lord Ashbourne's Act, 175, 176 
 
 Kaj, mode of succession to the, 31 
 
 Kefections, 29, 37 
 
 Reformation, efforts of Henry VIII. to 
 
 introduce the, into Ireland, 59 
 Eent, origin of, 11 
 Rents, raised by competition, 93, 94; 
 
 in Scotland and England, compared 
 
 with Ireland, 142 
 Resumption Act, 84 
 Ri, the, 18, 25, 28 
 Ribbonmen, 109, 110 
 Richard II. visits Ireland, 53 
 Richmond Commission, 157, 158 
 Roman Catholics, influence of, absent, 3 
 Runrig, 6 
 
 Saer tenancy, 10, 11; rules of, 28, 29 
 Salisbury, Earl of, 70 
 'Salus Populi ' of Pandarus, 59 (note) 
 Sanction, want of, in Brelion Law, 19, 
 
 20 
 Satellitum poturae, 37 (note) 
 Savings Banks, 156 
 Secret societies, 102 
 Senchus Mor, 20, 21 
 
 Sencleiths, 16, 18 
 
 Separate property in land, not known 
 in early times, 3 ; favoured by Brehon 
 lawyers, 7 
 
 Sept, 5, 35 
 
 Services of Ceile tenants, 28 
 
 Settlement, Acts of, 81; repealed at 
 Dublin, 83; effect of the, on native 
 small holders, 90 
 
 Sexual relations in early Irish history, 
 11 
 
 Sheep breeding, 93 
 
 Shragh and mart, 37 (note) 
 
 Simnel, 55 
 
 Slaves, 15 
 
 Sorohen, 37 
 
 South, ibid. 
 
 Spenser, 36 (note) 
 
 Statutes, English, how applied to Ire- 
 land, 52 
 
 Statutory terms, 162, 163, 178 
 
 Stock, rules for amount of, 29 
 
 Strafford, Earl of, 77 
 
 Strongbow, lands in Ireland, 42; con- 
 quests of, 42 
 
 Suffolk, Earl of, 71 (note) 
 
 Talbot, Sir John, expedition of, 53 
 
 (note) 
 Tanaist, 8; election of, ibid. 
 Tanistry, ibid. ; final abolition of, 67, 
 
 69 
 Taurcrech, 25 
 Tenancy at will fostered by Penal and 
 
 Commercial Codes, 87, 90 
 Tenant-right, in Ulster, 117—123; de- 
 finition of, 119 ; value of, ibid. ; 
 
 League, 122 
 Tenants at will, native race reduced to, 
 
 90; no growth of customary rights 
 
 in case of, in Ireland, 90, 91 ; origin 
 
 and growth of, 105, 106 
 Tenant's view of his rights in the land, 
 
 133 
 Tenants, favourable position of under-, 
 
 Acts of 1870 and 1881, 171 
 Tenure and Improvement of Land 
 
 (Ireland) Act, 130 
 
INDEX. 
 
 191 
 
 Tenures, Feudal, introduction of, 40 ; 
 substitution of English for Irish, 67 
 et seq.; influenced by political mo- 
 tives, 94, 99, 101, 104, 105, 107 
 
 Termon lands, 24, 31 
 
 Three F's, the, 159 
 
 Tithe Agistment Act, 93 (note) 
 
 Tithe farmers, 95 
 
 Tithes, ihid. 
 
 Tribal group, nature of the, 5 
 
 Tribal territory, divisions of, in early 
 community, 6, 24 
 
 Tribe, early Irish, 5; social division 
 of, 15, 18 
 
 Tribe-land, pasturage, 24, 33, 34; 
 arable, 24, 34, 35 
 
 Trinoda necessitas, the, 44 
 
 Tuath, 18, 24 
 
 Tyrconnel, Earl of, forfeiture by, 63, 
 73 
 
 Tyrone, Earl of, 62 
 
 Ulster, not subdued by Henry II. , 46 ; 
 theoretical confiscation of, in reign 
 of Elizabeth, 60 ; plantation of, 63, 
 64 ; scheme of plantation, 74, 75 ; 
 prosperity of settlers in, 64, 117 
 
 Ulster Custom, origin of, 73, 93, 117, 
 119, 220 ; nature of, 117—123, 140, 
 
 141; faults of, 121, 123; not suit- 
 able for legal enforcement through- 
 out Ireland, 122, 123 ; as affected by 
 Act of 1870, 139—142; as affected 
 by Act of 1881, 162 ; reported on by 
 Devon Commission, 119; reported 
 on by Bessborough Commission, 159 
 
 Union, passing of the, 102, 103 
 
 United Irishmen, 102 
 
 Villein tenures, growth of, in England, 
 91 
 
 Wales, laws of, 22 
 
 Warbeck Plots, 55 
 
 Wards and Liveries, Court of, 82 (note) 
 
 Wentworth (Earl of Strafford), 62, 77, 
 
 78 
 Whiteboys, 96 
 
 William III. landed in England, 83 
 Windsor, Treaty of, 46 
 Women, not entitled to inherit under 
 
 Brehon Law, 35 
 Worcester, Philip of, 48 
 
 Yearly tenancies, origin and growth of, 
 
 105 
 Young Ireland risings, 113 
 
 UNIVERSITY 
 
 cambbidge: printed by c. j. clay, m.a. and sons, at the university press. 
 
University Press, Cambridge 
 March, 1890 
 
 CATALOGUE OF 
 
 WO RKS 
 
 PUBLISHED FOR THE SYNDICS 
 
 OF THE 
 
 Camijrtlrse ^nibersitp ^ress. 
 
 Uontion: c j. clay and sons, 
 
 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, 
 
 AVE MARIA LANE. 
 
 GLASGOW: 263, Argyle Street. 
 
 CamtJriUge: DEIGHTON, BELL AND CO. 
 ILnpjifl: F. A. BROCKHAUS. 
 
 14/3/90 
 
PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 W\)t Camijritige Bntbersttp ^ress, 
 
 THE REVISED VERSION 
 
 OF THE 
 
 OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS. 
 
 TJke Revised Version is the Joint Property of the Universities of 
 
 Oxford a7id Camby-idge, 
 
 ( The Cambridge &^ Oxford Editions are uniform in Type, Size, &^ Price.) 
 
 The following Editions of the Revised Version of the Holy Bible 
 and New Testament have been already published and may be had 
 in a great variety of cloth and leather bindings of all booksellers. 
 
 THE HOLY BIBLE. 
 
 N.B. The Pearl i67no., the Ruby i6mo., and the Minion Svo., a7c 
 facsimile editions and correspond page for page with each other. 
 
 Cheap edition for tise in Schools. 
 I. Pearl type, i6mo. prices from i/6 
 
 2. Ruby type, i6mo. do. 4/6 
 
 3. Minion type, 8vo. do. 7/6 
 
 A large type edition in- one vohime. 
 4. Small Pica type. Imperial 8vo. prices from 18/- 
 
 LIBRARY EDITIONS. 
 
 In five vols., or the Old Testament only, in four volumes. 
 
 5. Pica type. Demy 8vo. 5 vols., prices from £2 
 
 6. Pica type, Demy 8vo. Old Testament only, 4 vols., do. ^i. \2s. 
 
 7. Pica type. Royal 8vo. 5 vols., do. ^3. 7.s. 6d. 
 
 8. Pica type, Royal 8vo. Old Testament only, 4 vols., do. £2. los. 
 
 THE PARALLEL BIBLE. 
 
 Being the Authorised Version arranged in Parallel columns with 
 the Revised Version. 
 9. Minion type. Crown 4to. prices from 18/- 
 10. Minion type, Crown 4to. thin India paper, prices from £1. lis. 6d. 
 
 THE BOOK OF PSALMS. ' 
 II. Long Primer type, 8vo. prices from i/- 
 
 Londo7i : C. J. Cla v &^ Sons, Ca77ibridge University Press Warchoiise, 
 Ave Maria. Lane. 
 
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS BOOKS. 3 
 
 THE REVISED VERSION OF 
 
 THE NEW TESTAMENT. 
 
 Cheap editions for use in Schools. 
 
 1. Nonpareil type, 321110. prices from -/6 
 
 2. Brevier type, i6mo. do. i/- 
 
 3. Long Primer type, 8vo. do. 1/6 
 
 LIBRARY EDITIONS. 
 
 4. Pica type, Demy 8vo. prices from 8/- 
 
 5. Pica type. Royal 8vo. do. 12/6 
 
 THE PARALLEL NEW TESTAMENT. 
 Giving the Authorised and Revised Versions side by side. 
 
 6. Pearl type, i6mo. (Pocket Edition) prices from 1/6 
 
 7. Minion type, 8vo. do. 4/6 
 
 8. Long Primer type, 4to. do. 7/6 
 
 STUDENT'S LARGE PAPER EDITION. 
 
 9. Minion type. Crown 4to. prices from 10/6 
 
 All Editions of the Parallel New Testament correspond page for 
 page with each other. 
 
 THE NEW TESTAMENT AND PSALMS. 
 10. Long Primer type, 8vo. prices from 2/6 
 
 THE PARALLEL NEW TESTAMENT, Greek and 
 English. The Greek Text edited by the Rev. F. H. A. Scrivener, 
 M.A., LL.D., and printed on alternate pages with the English 
 Parallel Minion Edition of the Revised Version. 
 
 Minion type, Crown 8vo. prices from 12/6 
 
 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN GREEK, according to 
 
 the Text followed in .the Authorised Version with the variations 
 adopted in the Revised Version. Edited by the Rev. F. H. A. 
 Scrivener, M.A., LL.D. 
 
 Crown 8vo. prices from 6/- 
 
 Specimens of type and size of pages with prices sent on application. 
 
 London : C, J. Cla v ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. I — 2 
 
PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, &c. 
 
 THE CAMBRIDGE PARAGRAPH BIBLE of the Au- 
 thorized English Version, with the Text Revised by a Collation of its 
 Early and other Principal Editions, the Use of the Italic Type made 
 uniform, the Marginal References remodelled, and a Critical Intro- 
 duction prefixed, by F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., LL.D., Editor of 
 the Greek Testament, Codex Augiensis, &c., and one of the Revisers 
 of the Authorized Version. Crown 4to. gilt. 7.\s. 
 
 From the Times. literature of the subject, by such workers as 
 "Students of the Bible should be particu- Mr Francis Fry and Canon Westcott, appeal 
 larly grateful (to the Cambridge University to a wide range of sympathies; and to these 
 Press) for having produced, with the able as- may now be added Dr Scrivener, well known 
 sistance of Dr Scrivener, a complete critical for his labours in the cause of the Greek Testa- 
 edition of the Authorized Version of the Eng- ment criticism, who has brought out, for the 
 lish Bible, an edition such as, to use the words Syndics of the Cambridge University Press, 
 of the Editor, 'would have been executed long an edition of the English Bible, according to 
 ago had this version been nothing more than the text of 1611, revised by a comparison with 
 the greatest and best known of English clas- later issues on principles stated by him in his 
 sics.' Falling at a time when the formal revi- Introduction. Here he enters at length into 
 sion of this version has been undertaken by a the history of the chief editions of the version, 
 distinguished company of scholars and divines, and of such features as the marginal notes, the 
 the publication of this edition must be con- use of italic type, and the changes of ortho- 
 sidered most opportune." graphy, as well as into the most interesting 
 Yroxa.\h^Athen(Eum. question as to the original texts from which 
 "Apart from its religious importance, the our translation is produced." 
 English Bible has the glory, which but few From the London Quarterly Review. 
 sister versions indeed can claim, of being the "The work is worthy in every respect of the 
 chief classic of the language, of having, in editor's fame, and of the Cambridge University 
 conjunction with Shakspeare, and in an im- Press. The noble English Version, to which 
 measurable degree more than he, fixed the our country and religion owe so much, was 
 language beyond any possibility of important probably never presented before in so perfect a 
 change. Thus the recent contributions to the form." 
 
 THE CAMBRIDGE PARAGRAPH BIBLE. Student^s 
 Edition, on good writing paper ^ with one column of print and wide 
 margin to each page for MS. notes. This edition will be found of 
 great use to those who are engaged in the task of Biblical criticism. 
 Two Vols. Crown 4to. gilt. 31^. dd. 
 
 THE AUTHORIZED EDITION OF THE ENGLISH 
 BIBLE (1611), ITS SUBSEQUENT REPRINTS AND MO- 
 DERN REPRESENTATIVES. Being the Introduction to the 
 Cambridge Paragraph Bible (1873), re-edited with corrections and 
 additions. By F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D., Pre- 
 bendary of Exeter and Vicar of Hendon. Crown 8vo. "js. 6d. 
 
 THE LECTIONARY BIBLE, WITH APOCRYPHA, 
 
 divided into Sections adapted to the Calendar and Tables of 
 Lessons of 1871. Crown 8vo. 3^. 6d. 
 
 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN GREEK according to the 
 text followed in the Authorised Version, with the Variations adopted 
 in the Revised Version. Edited by F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., 
 D.C.L., LL.D. Crown 8vo. 6s. Morocco boards or limp. 12s. 
 
 The Revised Version is the Joint Property of the Universities 
 of Cambridge aiid Oxford. 
 
 BREVIARIUM ROMANUM a Francisco Cardinali 
 
 QuiGNONiO editum et recognitum iuxta editionem Venetiis a.d. 1535 
 impressam curante JOHANNE WiCKHAM Legg Societatis Anti- 
 quariorum atque Coll, Reg. Medicorum Londin. Socio. Demy 8vo. lis. 
 
 Londofi '. C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse.^ 
 Ave Maria Lane, 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 5 
 
 BREVIARIUM AD USUM INSIGNIS ECCLESIAE 
 
 SARUM. Juxta Editionem maximam pro Claudio Chevallon 
 ET Francisco Regnault a.d. mdxxxi. in Alma Parisiorum 
 Academia impressam : labore ac studio Francisci Procter, 
 A.M., ET Christophori Wordsworth, A.M. 
 
 Fasciculus I. In quo continentur Kalendarium, et Ordo 
 Temporalis sive Proprium de Tempore totius anni, una cum 
 ordinali suo quod usitato vocabulo dicitur Pica sive DiRECTORiUM 
 Sacerdotum. Demy 8vo. i8s. 
 
 " The value of this reprint is considerable to usually necessitated a visit to some public 
 
 liturgical students, who will now be able to con- library, since the rarity of the volume made its 
 
 suit in their own libraries a work absolutely in- cost prohibitory to all but a few." — Literary 
 
 dispensable to a right understanding of the his- Churchman. 
 tory of the Prayer- Book, but which till now 
 
 Fasciculus II. In quo continentur Psalterium, cum ordinario 
 Officii totius hebdomadae juxta Horas Canonicas, et proprio Com- 
 pletorii, LiTANiA, Commune Sanctorum, Ordinarium Missae 
 CUM Canone et XIII Missis, &c. &c. Demy 8vo. \7.s. 
 
 "Not only experts in liturgiology, but all "Cambridge has worthily taken the lead 
 
 persons interested in the history of the Anglican with the Breviary, which is of especial value 
 
 Book of Common Prayer, will be grateful to the for that part of the reform of the Prayer- Book 
 
 Syndicate of the Cambridge University Press for which will fit it for the wants of our time." — 
 
 forwarding the publication of the volume which Church Quarterly Review. 
 bears the above t\\X^."— Notes and Queries. 
 
 Fasciculus III. In quo continetur Proprium Sanctorum 
 quod et sanctorale dicitur, una cum accentuario. Demy 8vo. \^s. 
 
 *^* An Introduction of 130 pages, prefixed to this volume, contains 
 (besides other interesting information as to the Breviary and its contents) 
 Mr Bradshaw's exhaustive lists of editions and copies of the Breviary 
 and allied liturgical books. 
 
 Fasciculi I. II. III. complete, £2. 2s. 
 
 GREEK AND ENGLISH TESTAMENT, in parallel 
 Columns on the same page. Edited by J. Scholefield, M.A. 
 Small Odlavo. New Edition, with the Marginal References as 
 arranged and revised by Dr SCRIVENER. Cloth, red edges. 7^. dd. 
 
 GREEK AND ENGLISH TESTAMENT. The Stu- 
 dent's Edition of the above, on large writing paper. 4to. \is. 
 
 GREEK TESTAMENT, ex editione Stephani tertia, 1550. 
 Small 8vo. 3J. dd. 
 
 THE PARALLEL NEW TESTAMENT, GREEK AND 
 ENGLISH, being the Authorised Version set forth in 1611 arranged 
 in Parallel Columns with the Revised Version of 188 1, and with the 
 original Greek, as edited by F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., D.C.L., 
 LL.D. Crown 8vo. I2J. (id. The Revised Version is the Joint 
 Property of the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford. 
 
 THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES, with Notes and In- 
 troduction. By the Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D., Dean of 
 Wells. Large Paper Edition. Demy 8vo. Ts. 6d. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
PUBLJCATJONS OF 
 
 THE OLD TESTAMENT IN GREEK ACCORDING 
 
 TO THE SEPTUAGINT. Edited by H. B. Swete, D.D 
 Honorary Fellow of Gonville and Caius College. Vol. I. Genesis — 
 IV Kings. Crown 8vo. Js. 6d. 
 Volume II. By the same Editor. \Tn the Press. 
 
 " Der Zweck dieser Ausgabe, den ganzen Bezuglich der Accente und Spiritus der Eigen- 
 
 in den erwahnten Hss. vorliegenden kritischen namen sind die Herausg. ihre eigenen Wege 
 
 Stoff iibersichtlich zusammenzustellen und dem gegangen." — Deutsche Litteraturzeitiing. 
 Beniitzer das Nachschlagen in den Separat- ..a^, t^ ,-,• i i .. j • ..u 
 
 ausgaben jener Codices zu ersparen, ist hier , \ ^^ ^r n °"u^ -^ ^^^" executed in the very 
 
 in compendiosester Weise vortreffllch erreicht. ^^^^ ^'^'^ ^^ Cambridge accuracy, which has no 
 
 Bezuglich der Klarheit, Schonheit und Cor- f^^T^lZr^^l^^ ^^t n/ldlLTfor^^n ,a 
 
 rectheit des Drucks gebQrt der Ausgabe das ^^ "^^ ^^^^'^^ "^^ ''■''^ ""^ ^'^'^'^"^ ^^"^ ""^""^^ 
 
 hochste Lob. Da zugleich der Preis sehr nic ^^^^. —Academy. 
 
 drig gestellt ist, so ist zu hoffen und zu wiin- "An edition, which for ordinary purposes 
 
 schen, dass sie auch aufserhalb des englischen will probably henceforth be that in use by 
 
 Sprachkreises ihre Verbreitung finden werde. readers of the Septuagint." — Guardian. 
 
 THE BOOK OF PSALMS IN GREEK ACCORDING 
 TO THE SEPTUAGINT, being a portion of Vol. II. of the above. 
 Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW in 
 
 Anglo-Saxon and Northumbrian Versions, synoptically arranged: 
 with Collations exhibiting all the Readings of all the MSS. Edited 
 by the Rev. W. W. Skeat, Litt.D., Elrington and Bosworth Pro- 
 fessor of Anglo-Saxon. New Edition. Demy 4to. los. 
 
 " By the publication of the present volume for the scholarly and accurate way in which he 
 
 Prof. Skeat has brought to its conclusion a has performed his laborious task. Thanks to 
 
 work planned more than a half century ago by him we now possess a reliable edition of all the 
 
 the late J. M. Kemble. .. Students of English existing MSS. of the old English Gospels." — 
 
 have every reason to be grateful to Prof. Skeat Academy. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK, uniform 
 with the preceding, by the same Editor. Demy 4to. \os. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE, uniform 
 with the preceding, by the same Editor. Demy 4to. \os. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN, uniform 
 with the preceding, by the same Editor. Demy 4to. \os. 
 
 " The Gospel according to St John, in ticular volume now before us, we can only say 
 
 Atiglo-Saxon and Northumbrian Versions: it is worthy of its two predecessors. We repeat 
 
 completes an undertaking designed and com- that the service rendered to the study of Anglo- 
 
 menced by that distinguished scholar, J. M. Saxon by this Synoptic collection cannot easily 
 
 Kemble, some forty years ago. Of the par- be overstated." — Contemporary Review. 
 
 THE FOUR GOSPELS (as above) bound in one volume, 
 price 30i', 
 
 THE POINTED PRAYER BOOK, being the Book of 
 Common Prayer with the Psalter or Psalms of David, pointed as 
 they are to be sung or said in Churches. Royal 24mo. \s. 6d. 
 The same in square 32mo, cloth. 6^. 
 
 THE CAMBRIDGE PSALTER, for the use of Choirs and 
 
 Organists. Specially adapted for Congregations in which the " Cam- 
 bridge Pointed Prayer Book" is used. Demy 8vo. cloth extra, y. 6d. 
 cloth limp, cut flush. 2s. 6d. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y fir» Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 7 
 
 THE PARAGRAPH PSALTER, arranged for the use of 
 
 Choirs by Brooke Foss Westcott, D.D., Regius Professor of 
 Divinity in the University of Cambridge. Fcap. 4to. ^s. 
 
 The same in royal 32mo. Cloth \s. Leather \s. 6^. 
 
 THE MISSING FRAGMENT OF THE LATIN TRANS- 
 LATION OF THE FOURTH BOOK OF EZRA, discovered, 
 and edited with an Introduction and Notes, and a facsimile of the 
 MS., by Robert L. Bensly, M.A., Lord Almoner's Professor of 
 Arabic. Demy 4to. \os. 
 
 "It has been said of this book that it has Bible we understand that of the larger size 
 
 added a new chapter to the Bible, and, startUng which contains the Apocrypha, and if the 
 
 as the statement may at first sight appear, it is Second Book of Esdras can be fairly called a 
 
 no exaggeration of the actual fact, if by the part of the Apocrypha."— 6'a/«rfl?rtj' if ^z/r^w. 
 
 THE HARKLEAN VERSION OF THE EPISTLE 
 
 TO THE HEBREWS, Chap. xi. 28— xiii. 25. Now edited for the 
 first time with Introduction and Notes on this Version of the Epistle. 
 By Robert L. Bensly, M.A. Demy 8vo. 5^. 
 
 NOTITIA CODICIS QUATTUOR EVANGELIORUM 
 
 Grseci Membranacei viris doctis hucusque incogniti quem in museo 
 suo asservat Eduardus Reuss Argentoratensis. 2s. 
 
 THE ORIGIN OF THE LEICESTER CODEX OF THE 
 
 NEW TESTAMENT. By J. Rendel Harris, M.A. With 3 
 plates. Demy 4to. \os. 6d. 
 
 THE REST OF THE WORDS OF BARUCH : A 
 
 Christian Apocalypse of the Year 136 A. D. The Text revised with 
 an Introduction. By J. Rendel Harris, M.A. Royal 8vo. 5^. 
 
 CODEX S. CEADDAE LATINUS. Evangelia SSS. 
 Matthaei, Marci, Lucae ad cap. Ill, 9 complectens, circa septimum 
 vel octavum saeculum scriptvs, in Ecclesia CathedraH Lichfieldiensi 
 servatus. Cum codice versionis Vulgatae Amiatino contulit, pro- 
 legomena conscripsit, F. H. A. Scrivener, A.M., D.C.L., LL.D., 
 With 3 plates. £i- is. 
 
 THEOLOaY-(ANCIENT). 
 
 THE GREEK LITURGIES. Chiefly from original Autho- 
 rities. By C. A. SWAINSON, D.D., late Master of Christ's College, 
 Cambridge. Crown 4to. Paper covers, i ^s. 
 
 •'Jeder folgende Forscher wird dankbar Griechischen Liturgien sicher gelegt hat."— 
 anerkennen, dass Swainson das Fundament zu Adolph Harnack, Theologische Literatnr 
 einer historisch-kritischen Geschichte der Zeitung. 
 
 London : C. % Cla y «Sr» SoNS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane, 
 
8 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 THEODORE OF MOPSUESTIA'S COMMENTARY 
 ON THE MINOR EPISTLES OF S. PAUL. The Latin Ver- 
 sion with the Greek Fragments, edited from the MSS. with Notes 
 and an Introduction, by H. B. Swete, D.D. In Two Volumes. 
 Volume I., containing the Introduction, with Facsimiles of the MSS., 
 and the Commentary upon Galatians — Colossians. Demy 8vo. \2s. 
 
 " It is the result of thorough, careful, and ster Sachkenntniss sein Werk mit alien den- 
 patient investigation of all the points bearing jenigen Zugaben ausgeriistet, weiche bei einer 
 on the subject, and the results are presented solchen Text-Ausgabe nur irgend erwartet 
 with admirable good sense and modesty." — werden konnen. . . . Von den drei Haupt- 
 Guardian. handschriften . . , sind vortreffliche photo- 
 
 " In dem oben verzeichneten Buche liegt graphische Facsimile's beigegeben, wie iiber- 
 
 uns die erste Halfte einer vollstandigen, ebenso haupt das ganze Werk von der University 
 
 sorgfaltig gearbeiteten wie schon ausgestat- Press zu Cambridge mit bekannter Eleganz 
 
 teten Ausgabe des Commentars mit ausfiihr- ausgestattet ist." — Tkeologische Literaturzei- 
 
 lichen Prolegomena und reichhaltigen kritis- tung. 
 
 chen und erlauternden Anmerkungen vor." — " Hernn Swete's Leistung ist cine so 
 
 Literarisches Centralblatt. tiichtige dass wir das Werk in keinen besseren 
 
 "Auf Grund dieser Quellen ist der Text Handen wissen mochten, und mit den sich- 
 
 bei Swete mit musterhafter Akribie herge- ersten Erwartungen auf das Gelingen der 
 
 stellt. Aber auch sonst hat der Herausgeber Fortsetzung entgegen sehen." — Gottingische 
 
 mit unermiidlichem Fleisse und eingehend- gelekrte A fizeigen {Sept. 1881). 
 
 Volume II., containing the Commentary on i Thessalonians — 
 Philemon, Appendices and Indices. 12s. 
 
 "Eine Ausgabe . . . fiir weiche alle zugang- (Sept. 23, 1882). 
 lichen Hiilfsmittel in musterhafter Weise be- "Mit derselben Sorgfalt bearbeitet die wir 
 
 niitzt wurden . . . eine reife Frucht siebenjahri- bei dem ersten Theile geriihmt haben." — 
 
 gen Fleisses." — Tkeologische Literaturzeitung Literarisches Centralblatt (^}v\y 29, 1882). 
 
 SAYINGS OF THE JEWISH FATHERS, comprising 
 Pirqe Aboth and Pereq R. Meir in Hebrew and English, with Cri- 
 tical and Illustrative Notes. By Charles Taylor, D.D., Master 
 of St John's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. loj. 
 
 "The 'Masseketh Aboth' stands at the "A careful and thorough edition which does 
 
 head of Hebrew non-canonical writings. It is credit to English scholarship, of a short treatise 
 
 of ancient date, claiming to contain the dicta from the Mishna, containing a series of sen- 
 
 of teachers who flourished from B.C. 200 to the tences or maxims ascribed mostly to Jewish 
 
 same year of our era. Mr Taylor's explana- teachers immediately preceding, or immediately 
 
 tory and illustrative commentary is very full following the Christian era. . ." — Contempo- 
 
 and satisfactory." — Spectator. rary Review. 
 
 A COLLATION OF THE ATHOS CODEX OF THE 
 
 SHEPHERD OF HERMAS. Together with an Introduction by 
 Spyr. p. Lambros, Ph. D., translated and edited with a Preface and 
 Appendices by J. Armitage Robinson, M.A., Fellow and Dean of 
 Christ's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 3^. 6d. 
 
 THE PALESTINIAN MISHNA. By W. H. LoWE, M.A., 
 Lecturer in Hebrew at Christ's College, Cambridge. Royal 8vo. 21J. 
 
 SANCTI IREN^I EPISCOPI LUGDUNENSIS libros 
 quinque adversus Hsereses, versione Latina cum Codicibus Claro- 
 montano ac Arundeliano denuo collata, prasmissa de placitis Gnos- 
 ticorum prolusione, fragmenta necnon Graece, Syriace, Armeniace, 
 commentatione perpetua et indicibus variis edidit W. Wigan 
 Harvey, S.T.B. CoUegii Regalis olim Socius. 2 Vols. 8vo. iSs. 
 
 M. MINUCII FELICIS OCTAVIUS. The text revised 
 from the original MS., with an English Commentary, Analysis, Intro- 
 du(5lion, and Copious Indices. Edited by H. A. Holden, LL.D. 
 Examiner in Greek to the University of London. Crown Svo. 7s. 6d. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v &^ Sons, Cambridge Uftiversity Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. g 
 
 THEOPHILI EPISCOPI ANTIOCHENSIS LIBRI 
 
 TRES AD AUTOLYCUM edidit, Prolegomenis Versione Notulis 
 Indicibus instruxit G. G. Humphry, S.T.B. Post 8vo. 5^. 
 
 THEOPHYLACTI IN EVANGELIUM S. MATTH^I 
 COMMENTARIUS, edited by W. G. Humphry, B.D. Prebendary 
 of St Paul's, late Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. js. dd. 
 
 TERTULLIANUS DE CORONA MILITIS, DE SPEC- 
 
 TACULIS, DE IDOLOLATRIA, with Analysis and English Notes, 
 by George Currey, D.D. Preacher at the Charter House, late 
 Fellow and Tutor of St John's College. Crown 8vo. 5^. 
 
 FRAGMENTS OF PHILO AND JOSEPHUS. Newly 
 edited by J. Rendel Harris, M.A., Fellow of Clare College, 
 Cambridge. With two Facsimiles. Demy 4to. 12s. 6d. 
 
 THE TEACHING OF THE APOSTLES. Newly edited, 
 with Facsimile Text and Commentary, by J. Rendel Harris, M.A. 
 Demy4to. ^i. is. 
 
 THEOLOGY— (ENGLISH). 
 
 WORKS OF ISAAC BARROW, compared with the Ori- 
 ginal MSS., enlarged with Materials hitherto unpublished. A new 
 Edition, by A. Napier, M.A. 9 Vols. Demy 8vo. ^3. 3^. 
 
 TREATISE OF THE POPE'S SUPREMACY, and a 
 
 Discourse concerning the Unity of the Church, by Isaac Barrow. 
 Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 PEARSON'S EXPOSITION OF THE CREED, edited 
 by Temple Chevallier, B.D. New Edition. Revised by R. Sinker, 
 D.D., Librarian of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. 12s. 
 
 "A new edition of Bishop Pearson's famous College Altogether this appears to be the 
 
 work On the Cr^^^ has just been issued by the most complete and convenient edition as yet 
 Cambridge University Press. It is the well- published of a work which has long been re- 
 known edition of Temple Chevallier, thoroughly cognised in all quarters as a standard one." — 
 overhauled by the Rev. R. Sinker, of Trinity Guardian. 
 
 AN ANALYSIS OF THE EXPOSITION OF THE 
 CREED written by the Right Rev. John Pearson, D.D. late Lord 
 Bishop of Chester, by W. H. Mill, D.D. Demy 8vo. 5^. 
 
 WHEATLY ON THE COMMON PRAYER, edited by 
 G. E. CORRIE, D.D. late Master of Jesus College. Demy 8vo. 7 j. dd. 
 
 TWO FORMS OF PRAYER OF THE TIME OF QUEEN 
 
 ELIZABETH. Now First Reprinted. Demy 8vo. dd. 
 
 C^SAR MORGAN'S INVESTIGATION OF THE 
 TRINITY OF PLATO, and of Philo Judsus, and of the effe^s 
 which an attachment to their writings had upon the principles and 
 reasonings of the Fathers of the Christian Church. Revised by H. A. 
 ' ' " Crown 8vo. 4^. 
 
 London : C. y. Cla y &^ SoNS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 
 Ave Ma7'ia Lane. 1 — 5 
 
lo PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 SELECT DISCOURSES, by John Smith, late Fellow of 
 Queens' College, Cambridge. Edited by H. G. Williams, B.D. late 
 Professor of Arabic. Royal 8vo. ^s. 6d. 
 
 "The 'Select Discourses' of John Smith, no spiritually thoughtful mind can read them 
 
 collected and published from his papers after unmoved. They carry us so directly into an 
 
 his death, are, in my opinion, much the most atmosphere of divine philosophy, luminous 
 
 considerable work left to us by this Cambridge with the richest lights of meditative genius... 
 
 School [the Cambridge Platonists]. They have He was one of those rare thinkers in whom 
 
 a right to a place in English literary history." largeness of view, and depth, and wealth of 
 
 — Mr Matthew Arnold, in the Contevipo- poetic and speculative insight, only served to 
 
 rary Review. evoke more fully the religious spirit, and while 
 
 "Of all the products of the Cambridge he drew the mould of his thought from Plotinus, 
 
 School, the 'Select Discourses' are perhaps he vivified the substance of it from St Paul."— 
 
 the highest, as they are the most accessible Principal Tulloch, Rational Theology in 
 
 and the most widely appreciated... and indeed England in the ijth Century. 
 
 THE HOMILIES, with Various Readings, and the Quo- 
 tations from the Fathers given at length in the Original Languages. 
 Edited by the late G. E. Corrte, D.D. Demy 8vo. yj. 6^. 
 
 DE OBLIGATIONE CONSCIENTI..E PR.ELECTIONES 
 
 decern Oxonii in Schola Theologica habitas a Roberto Sanderson, 
 SS. Theologiae ibidem Professore Regio. With English Notes, 
 including an abridged Translation, by W. Whewell, D.D. late 
 Master of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. 'js. 6d. 
 
 ARCHBISHOP USHER'S ANSWER TO A JESUIT, 
 
 with other Trafls on Popery. Edited by J. Scholefield, M.A. late 
 Regius Professor of Greek in the University. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 WILSON'S ILLUSTRATION OF THE METHOD OF 
 
 explaining the New Testament, by the early opinions of Jews and 
 Christians concerning Christ. Edited by T. Turton, D.D. 8vo. 5^. 
 
 LECTURES ON DIVINITY delivered in the University 
 of Cambridge, by John Hey, D.D. Third Edition, revised by T. 
 Turton, D.D. late Lord Bishop of Ely. 2 vols. Demy Svo. 15^. 
 
 S. AUSTIN AND HIS PLACE IN THE HISTORY 
 OF CHRISTIAN THOUGHT. Being the Hulsean Lectures for 
 1885. By W. Cunningham, D.D. Demy 8vo. Buckram, 12s. 6d. 
 
 CHRIST THE LIFE OF MEN. The Hulsean Lectures 
 for 1888. By the Rev. H. M. Stephenson, M.A. Crown Svo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 THE GOSPEL HISTORY OF OUR LORD JESUS 
 CHRIST IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE REVISED 
 VERSION, arranged in a Connected Narrative, especially for the 
 use of Teachers and Preachers. By Rev. C. C. James, M.A., Rector 
 of Wortham, Suffolk, and late Fellow of King's College. Crown 8vo. 
 Zs. 6d. 
 
 ARABIC, SANSKRIT, SYRIAC, &c. 
 
 THE DIVYAvADANA, a Collection of Early Buddhist 
 Legends, now first edited from the Nepalese Sanskrit MSS. in 
 Cambridge and Paris. By E. B. COWELL, M.A., Professor of 
 Sanskrit in the University of Cambridge, and R. A. Neil, M.A., 
 Fellow and Lecturer of Pembroke College. Demy 8vo. 18^. 
 
 Lo?idojt : C. y. Cla y 6-» SONS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane, 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. ii 
 
 POEMS OF BEHA ED DIN ZOHEIR OF EGYPT. 
 
 With a Metrical Translation, Notes and Introduction, by E. H. 
 Palmer, M.A., Barrister-at-Law of the Middle Temple, late Lord 
 Almoner's Professor of Arabic, formerly Fellow of St John's College, 
 Cambridge. 2 vols. Crown 4to. 
 
 Vol. I. The Arabic Text. ios. dd. 
 
 Vol. II. English Translation. \os. 6d. 
 
 "We have no hesitation in saying that in remarked, by not unskih'ul imitations of the 
 
 both Prof. Palmer has made an addition to Ori- styles of several of our own favourite poets, 
 
 ental literature for which scholars should be living and dead." — Saturday Review. 
 grateful; and that, while his knowledge of "This sumptuous edition of the poems of 
 
 Arabic is a sufficient guarantee for his mastery Beha-ed-din Zoheir is a very welcome addition 
 
 of the original, his English compositions are to the small series of Eastern poets accessible 
 
 distinguished by versatility, command of Ian- to readers who are not Orientalists." — Aca- 
 
 guage, rhythmical cadence, and, as we have demy. 
 
 THE CHRONICLE OF JOSHUA THE STYLITE, com- 
 posed in Syriac A.D. 507, with an English translation and notes, by the 
 late W. Wright, LL.D., Professor of Arabic. Demy 8vo. los. 6d. 
 
 " Die lehrreiche kleine Chronik Josuas hat ein Lehrmittel fur den syrischen Unterricht ; es 
 
 nach Assemani und Martin in Wright einen erscheint auch gerade zur rechten Zeit, da die 
 
 dritten Bearbeiter gefunden, der sich um die zweite Ausgabe von Roedigers syrischer Chres- 
 
 Emendation des Textes wie um die Erklarung tomathie im Buchhandel vollstandig vergrifFen 
 
 der Realien wesentlich verdient gemacht hat und diejenige von Kirsch-Bernstein nur noch 
 
 . . . Ws. Josua-Ausgabe ist eine sehr dankens- in wenigen Exemplaren vorhanden ist." — 
 
 werte Gabe und besonders empfehlenswert als Deutsche Litteraturzeitung. 
 
 KALILAH AND DIMNAH, OR, THE FABLES OF 
 
 BIDPAI ; being an account of their literary history, together with 
 an EngHsh Translation of the same, with Notes, by I. G. N. Keith- 
 Falconer, M.A., late Lord Almoner's Professor of Arabic in the 
 University of Cambridge. Demy 8vo. js. 6d. 
 
 NALOPAkHYANAM, or, the tale of NALA; 
 
 containing the Sanskrit Text in Roman Characters, followed by a 
 Vocabulary and a sketch of Sanskrit Grammar. By the late 
 Rev. Thomas Jarrett, M.A. Trinity College, Regius Professor 
 of Hebrew. Demy 8vo. los. 
 
 NOTES ON THE TALE OF NALA, for the use of 
 
 Classical Students, by J. Peile, Litt.D., Master of Christ's College. 
 Demy 8vo. 12s. 
 
 CATALOGUE OF THE BUDDHIST SANSKRIT 
 
 MANUSCRIPTS in the University Library, Cambridge. Edited 
 by C. Bendall, M.A., Fellow of Gonville and Caius College. Demy 
 8vo. 1 2 J. 
 
 " It is unnecessary to state how the com- those concerned in it on the result . . . Mr Ben- 
 
 pilation of the present catalogue came to be dall has entitled himself to the thanks of all 
 
 placed in Mr Bendall's hands; from the cha- Oriental scholars, and we hope he may have 
 
 racter of his work it is evident the selection before him a long course of successful labour in 
 
 was judicious, and we may fairly congratulate the field he has chosen."— Atheneeum. 
 
 THE HISTORY OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT, 
 
 being the Syriac version of the Pseudo-Callisthenes. Edited from 
 Five Manuscripts, with an EngHsh Translation and Notes, by 
 E. A. W. Budge, M.A., Assistant in the Department of Egyptian 
 Antiquities, British Museum. Demy 8vo. 2^s. {The Edition is 
 limited to 250 copies.) 
 
 London: C. J. Clay &=> Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse ^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
 1—6 
 
12 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 GREEK AND LATIN CLASSICS, &c. 
 
 SOPHOCLES: The Plays and Fragments, with Critical 
 Notes, Commentary, and Translation in English Prose, by R. C. 
 Jebb, Litt.D., LL.D., Regius Professor of Greek in the University of 
 Cambridge. 
 
 Parti. Oedipus Tyrannus. DemySvo. New Edition. 12s. 6d. 
 
 Part II. Oedipus Coloneus. Demy 8vo. New Edition. \2s. 6d. 
 
 Part III. Antigone. Demy 8vo. 12s. 6d. 
 
 Part IV. Philoctetes. {In the Press. 
 
 "Of his explanatory and critical notes we "Prof. Jebb's keen and profound sympathy, 
 
 can only speak with admiration. Thorough not only with Sophocles and all the best of 
 
 scholarship combines with taste, erudition, and ancient Hellenic life and thought, but also with 
 
 boundless industry to make this first volume a modern European culture, constitutes him an 
 
 pattern of editing. The work is made com- ideal interpreter between the ancient writer 
 
 plete by a prose translation, upon pages alter- and the modern reader." — Athencetim. 
 
 nating with the text, of which we may say " It would be difficult to praise this third in- 
 
 shortly that it displays sound judgment and stalment of Professor Jebb's unequalled edition 
 
 taste, without sacrificing precision to poetry of of Sophocles too warmly, and it is almost a 
 
 expression." — The Times. work of supererogation to praise it at all. It is 
 
 "Professor Jebb's edition of Sophocles is equal, at least, and perhaps superior, in merit, 
 already so fully established, and has received to either of his previous instalments ; and when 
 such appreciation in these columns and else- this is said, all is said. Yet we cannot refrain 
 where, that we have judged this third volume from formally recognising once more the con- 
 when we have said that it is of a piece with summate Greek scholarship of the editor, and 
 the others. The whole edition so far exhibits from once more doing grateful homage to his 
 perhaps the most complete and elaborate edit- masterly tact and literary skill, and to his un- 
 orial work which has ever appeared." — Satur- wearied and marvellous industry." — Spectator, 
 day Review. 
 
 AESCHYLI FABULAE.— IKETIAES XOHOOPOI IN 
 
 LIBRO MEDICEO MENDOSE SCRIPTAE EX VV. DD. 
 CONIECTURIS EMENDATIUS EDITAE cum Scholiis Graecis 
 et brevi adnotatione critica, curante F. A. Paley, M.A., LL.D. 
 Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 THE AGAMEMNON OF AESCHYLUS. With a Trans- 
 lation in English Rhythm, and Notes Critical and Explanatory. 
 New Edition Revised. By the late Benjamin Hall Kennedy, 
 D.D., Regius Professor of Greek. Crown 8vo. 6^-. 
 
 "One of the best editions of the masterpiece of Greek txa.g&Ay."— At henceum. 
 
 THE THE^TETUS OF PLATO with a Translation and 
 Notes by the same Editor. Crown 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 ARISTOTLE.— nEPI >FTXHX. ARISTOTLE'S PSY- 
 CHOLOGY, in Greek and English, with Introduction and Notes, 
 by Edwin Wallace, M.A., late Fellow and Tutor of Worcester 
 College, Oxford. Demy 8vo. i8j. 
 
 "The notes are exactly what such notes "Wallace's Bearbeitung derAristotelischen 
 
 ought to be,— helps to the student, not mere Psychologic ist das Werk eines denkenden und 
 
 displays of learning. By far the more valuable in alien Schriften des Aristoteles und grossten- 
 
 parts of the notes are neither critical nor lite- teils auch in der neueren Litteratur zu densel- 
 
 rary, but philosophical and expository of the ben belesenen Mannes . . . Der schwachste 
 
 thought, and of the connection of thought, in Teil der Arbeit ist der kritische . . . Aber in 
 
 the treatise itself In this relation the notes are alien diesen Dingen liegt auch nach der Ab- 
 
 invaluable. Of the translation, it may be said sicht des Verfassers nicht der Schwerpunkt 
 
 that an English reader may fairly master by seiner Arbeit, sondern. "— Prof. Susemihl in 
 
 means of it this great treatise of Aristotle."— Philologische Wochenschrift. 
 Spectator. 
 
 London : C. J. Clav &^ Sons, Camdrid^e University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 13 
 
 ARISTOTLE.— nEPl A1KA102TNHX. THE FIFTH 
 
 BOOK OF THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS OF ARISTOTLE. 
 Edited by Henry Jackson, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College, 
 Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 6j. 
 
 "II is not too much to say that some of the will hope that this is not the only portion of 
 points he discusses have never had so much the Aristotelian writings which he is likely to 
 light thrown upon them before. . . . Scholars edit." — Athenceum. 
 
 ARISTOTLE. THE RHETORIC. With a Commentary 
 by the late E. M. Cope, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, re- 
 vised and edited by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. With a biographical 
 Memoir by the late H. A. J. MUNRO, Litt.D. 3 Vols., Demy 8vo. 
 Now reduced to 21^. [originally p2iblished at 31 j-. dd) 
 
 "This work is in manyways creditable to the "Mr Sandys has performed his arduous 
 
 University of Cambridge. If an English student duties with marked ability and admirable tact. 
 
 wishes to have a full conception of what is con- In every part of his work — revising, 
 
 tained in the ^A^^<7r/c of Aristotle, to Mr Cope's supplementing, and completing— he has done 
 
 edition he must go." — Academy. exceedingly well." — Examiner. 
 
 PINDAR. OLYMPIAN AND PYTHIAN ODES. With 
 Notes Explanatory and Critical, Introductions and Introductory 
 Essays. Edited by C. A. M. Fennell, Litt. D., late Fellow of 
 Jesus College. Crown 8vo. 9^-. 
 
 "Mr Fennell deserves the thanks of all clas- his author, great industry, a sound judgment, 
 
 sical students for his careful and scholarly edi- and, in particular, copious and minute learning 
 
 tion of the Olympian and Pythian odes. He in comparative philology." — Athenceum. 
 brings to his task the necessary enthusiasm for 
 
 THE ISTHMIAN AND NEMEAN ODES. By the same 
 
 Editor. Crown 8vo. 9^. 
 
 "... As a handy and instructive edition of valuable help to the study of the most difficult 
 
 a difficult classic no work of recent years sur- of Greek authors, and is enriched with notes 
 
 passes Mr Fennell's 'Pindar.'" — Athejiceum. on points of scholarship and etymology which 
 
 "This work is in no way inferior to could only have been written by a scholar of 
 
 the previous volume. The commentary affords very high attainments." — Saturday Review. 
 
 DEMOSTHENES. PRIVATE ORATIONS OF, with In- 
 troductions and English Notes, by the late F. A. Paley, M.A. 
 and J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Fellow and Tutor of St John's College, 
 and Public Orator in the University of Cambridge. 
 
 Part I. Contra Phormionem, Lacritum, Pantaenetum, Boeotum 
 de Nomine, Boeotum de Dote, Dionysodorum. New Edition. 
 Crown 8vo. 6j. 
 
 "Mr Paley's scholarship is sound and literature which bears upon his author, and 
 
 accurate, his experience of editing wide, and the elucidation of matters of daily life, in the 
 
 if he is content to devote his learning and delineation of which Demosthenes is so rich, 
 
 abilities to the production of such manuals obtains full justice at his hands. . . . We 
 
 as these, they will be received with gratitude hope this edition may lead the way to a more 
 
 throughout the higher schools of the country. general study of these speeches in schools 
 
 'Mr Sandys is deeply read in the German than has hitherto been Tpossihle."— Academy. 
 
 Part II. Pro Phormione, Contra Stephanum I. II.; Nicostra- 
 tum, Cononem, Calliclem. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. 
 
 " It is long since we have come upon a work mosthenes '." — Saturday Review. 
 
 evincing more pains, scholarship, and varied " the edition reflects credit on 
 
 research and illustration than Mr Sandys's Cambridge scholarship, and ought to be ex- 
 contribution to the 'Private Orations of De- tensively used." — At/ieneeum. 
 
 DEMOSTHENES. SPEECH AGAINST THE LAW 
 
 OF LEPTINES. With Introduction, Critical and Explanatory 
 Notes and Autotype Facsimile from the Paris MS. Edited by J. E. 
 Sandys, Litt.D. Demy 8vo. 9^. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
14 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 DEMOSTHENES AGAINST ANDROTION AND 
 AGAINST TIMOCRATES, with Introductions and English Com- 
 mentary, by William Wayte, M.A., late Professor of Greek, Uni- 
 versity College, London. Crown 8vo, "js. 6d. 
 
 "These speeches are highly interesting, as they are worthy of all admiration . . . Besides 
 
 illustrating Attic Law, as that law was in- a most lucid and interesting introduction, Mr 
 
 fluenced by the exigences of politics ... As Wayte has given the student effective help 
 
 vigorous examples of the great orator's style, in his running comm^nidixy."— Spectator. 
 
 PLATO'S PH^DO, literally translated, by the late E. M. 
 Cope, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, revised by Henry 
 Jackson, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. 5^. 
 
 P. VERGILI MARONIS OPERA, cum Prolegomenis 
 et Commentario Critico edidit B. H. Kennedy, S.T.P., Extra 
 Fcap. 8vo. 3J. 6d. 
 
 THE BACCHAE OF EURIPIDES. With Introduction, 
 Critical Notes, and Archaeological Illustrations, by J. E. Sandys, 
 Litt.D. New and Enlarged Edition. Crown 8vo. 12s. 6d. 
 
 " Ofthe present edition ofthe^acc//:^^ by Mr "The volume is interspersed with well- 
 Sandys we may safely say that never before has executed woodcuts, and its general attractive- 
 a Greek play, in England at least, had fuller ness of form reflects great credit on the Uni- 
 justice done to its criticism, interpretation, versity Press. In the notes Mr Sandys has more 
 and archaeological illustration, whether for the than sustained his well-earned reputation as a 
 young student or the more advanced scholar. careful and learned editor, and shows consider- 
 The Cambridge Public Orator may be said to able advance in freedom and lightness of style, 
 have taken the lead in issuing a complete edi- , . . Under such circumstances it is superfluous 
 tion of a Greek play, which is destined perhaps to say that for the purposes of teachers and ad- 
 to gain redoubled favour now that the study of vanced students this handsome edition far sur- 
 ancient monuments has been applied to its il- passes all its predecessors."— A tAenceum. 
 lustration. " — Saturday Review. 
 
 THE TYPES OF GREEK COINS. By Percy Gardner, 
 
 Litt. D., F.S.A. With 16 Autotype plates, containing photographs of 
 Coins of all parts of the Greek World. Impl. 4to. Cloth extra, 
 ^i. \\s. 6d.', Roxburgh (Morocco back), £2. 2s. 
 
 "Professor Gardner's book is written with be distinctly recommended to that omnivorous 
 such lucidity and in a manner so straightfor- class of readers — 'men in the schools'." — Sa- 
 ward that it may well win converts, and it may turday Review. 
 
 ESSAYS ON THE ART OF PHEIDIAS. By C. Wald- 
 STEIN, Litt. D., Phil. D., Reader in Classical Archaeology in the 
 University of Cambridge. Royal 8vo. With numerous Illustrations. 
 16 Plates. Buckram, 30^-. 
 
 " His book will be universally welcomed as " 'E.ssays on the Art of Pheidias' form an 
 
 a very valuable contribution towards a more extremely valuable and important piece of 
 
 thoroughknowledgeof the style of Pheidias." — work. . . . Taking it for the illustrations alone. 
 
 The Academy. it is an exceedingly fascinating book." — Times. 
 
 AN INTRODUCTION TO GREEK EPIGRAPHY. 
 Part I. The Archaic Inscriptions and the Greek Alphabet by E. S. 
 Roberts, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of Gonville and Caius College. 
 Demy 8vo. With illustrations. \Zs. 
 
 " We will say at once that Mr Roberts ap- notices bearing on each document. Explana- 
 pears to have done his work very well. The tory remarks either accompany the text or are 
 book is clearly and conveniently arranged. added in an appendix. To the whole is pre- 
 The inscriptions are naturally divided accord- fixed a sketch of the history of the alphabet up 
 ing to the places to which they belong. Under to the terminal date. At the end the result is 
 each head are given illustrations sufficient to resumed in general tables of all the alphabets, 
 show the characteristics of the writing, one classified according to their connexions; and a 
 copy in letters of the original form (sometimes separate table illustrates the alphabet of Athens. 
 a facsimile) being followed by another in the The volume contains about five hundred in- 
 usual cursive. References, which must have scriptions, and forms a moderate octavo of about 
 cost great labour, are given to the scattered four hundred pages." — Saturday Revie-iv. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v dr' Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 15 
 
 M. TULLI CICERONIS AD M. BRUTUM ORATOR. 
 
 A revised text edited with Introductory Essays and with critical 
 and explanatory notes, by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Demy 8vo. i6j. 
 
 "This volume, which is adorned with " A model edition ." — Spectator. 
 
 several good woodcuts, forms a handsome and "The commentary is in every way worthy 
 
 welcome addition to the Cambridge editions of of the editor's high reputation." — Academy. 
 Cicero's works.'' — Athettceum. 
 
 M. TULLI CICERONIS DE FINIBUS BONORUM 
 
 ET MALORUM LIBRI QUINQUE. The text revised and 
 explained ; with a Translation by James S. Reid, Litt. D., Fellow 
 and Tutor of Gonville and Caius College. 3 Vols. [/« the Press. 
 
 Vol. III. Containing the Translation. Demy 8vo. Zs. 
 
 M. T. CICERONIS DE OFFICIIS LIBRI TRES, with Mar- 
 ginal Analysis, English Commentary, and copious Indices, by H. A. 
 HoLDEN, LL.D. Sixth Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Cr. 8vo. qj. 
 
 "Few editions of a classic have found so position of the work secure." — American 
 much favour as Dr Holden's De Officiis, and Journal of Philology. 
 the present revision (sixth edition) makes the 
 
 M. T. CICERONIS DE OFFICIIS LIBER TERTIUS, 
 
 with Introduction, Analysis and Commentary, by H. A. HOLDEN, 
 LL.D. Crown 8vo. is. 
 
 M. TVLLI CICERONIS PRO C RABIRIO [PERDVEL- 
 
 LIONIS REO] ORATIO AD QVIRITES, with Notes, Introduc- 
 tion and Appendices by W. E. Heitland, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of 
 St John's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. "js. 6d. 
 
 M. TULLII CICERONIS DE NATURA DEORUM 
 
 Libri Tres, with Introduction and Commentary by JOSEPH B. 
 Mayor, M.A., together with a new collation of several of the 
 English MSS. by J. H. SWAINSON, M.A. 
 Vol. I. Demy 8vo. loi". 6d. Vol. II. 12s. 6d. Vol. III. los. 
 
 " Such editions as that of which Prof Mayor way admirably suited to meet the needs of the 
 
 has given us the first instalment will doubtless student . . . The notes of the editor are all that 
 
 do much to remedy this undeserved neglect. It could be expected from his well-known learn- 
 
 is one on which great pains and much learning ing and scholarship." — Academy. 
 have evidently been expended, and is in every 
 
 See also Pitt Press Series, pp. 30 — 34. 
 
 MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCE, &c. 
 
 MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PAPERS. By 
 Sir W. Thomson, LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., Professor of Natural Phi- 
 losophy in the University of Glasgow. Collected from different 
 Scientific Periodicals from May 1841, to the present time. Vol. I. 
 Demy 8vo. \Zs. Vol. 11. 15^". [Volume III. In the Press. 
 
 MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PAPERS, by 
 Sir G. G. Stokes, Sc.D., LL.D., F.R.S., Lucasian Professor of Mathe- 
 matics in the University of Cambridge. Reprinted from the Original 
 Journals and Transactions, with Additional Notes by the Author. 
 Vol.1. DemySvo. i^s. Vol.11. 15J. [Vol. III. I tt the Press. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cmnbridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria La7ie. 
 
1 6 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 A HISTORY OF THE THEORY OF ELASTICITY 
 AND OF THE STRENGTH OF MATERIALS, from Galilei to 
 the present time. Vol. I. Galilei to Saint- Venant, 1639-1850. 
 By the late I. TODHUNTER, Sc.D., F.R.S., edited and completed 
 by Professor Karl Pearson, M.A. Demy 8vo. 25^. 
 Vol. II. By the same Editor. \In the Press. 
 
 THE ELASTICAL RESEARCHES OF BARRE DE 
 SAINT- VENANT (Extract from Vol. II. of Todhunter's History 
 of the Theory of Elasticity), edited by Professor Karl Pearson, 
 M.A. Demy 8vo. 9^. 
 
 A TREATISE ON GEOMETRICAL OPTICS. By 
 
 R. S. Heath, M.A., Professor of Mathematics in Mason Science 
 College, Birmingham. Demy 8vo. 12s. 6d. 
 
 AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON GEOMETRICAL 
 
 OPTICS. By R. S. Heath, M.A. Crown 8vo. 5^. 
 A TREATISE ON ELEMENTARY DYNAMICS. By 
 
 S. L. LONEY, M.A., Fellow of Sidney Sussex College. Crown 8vo. 
 js. 6d. 
 
 A TREATISE ON PLANE TRIGONOMETRY. By 
 
 E. W. HOBSON, M.A., Fellow and Lecturer of Christ's College, 
 Cambridge. Demy 8vo. [In the Press. 
 
 CATALOGUE OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS COMPILED 
 BY THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON: Vols. 1—6 for the 
 years 1800 — 1863, Royal 4to. cloth (vol. i in half morocco) £\ (net); 
 half morocco ^5. ^s. (net). Vols. 7—8 for the years 1864— 1873, 
 cloth ;^i. \\s. 6d. (net); half morocco ^2. 5^-. (net). Single volumes 
 cloth 20s. or half-morocco 2^s. (net). New Series for the years 
 1 8 74— 1883. [In the Press. 
 
 THE COLLECTED MATHEMATICAL PAPERS OF 
 ARTHUR CAYLEY, Sc.D., F.R.S., Sadlerian Professor of Pure 
 Mathematics in the University of Cambridge. Demy 4to. 10 vols. 
 Vols. I. and II. 25^-. each. IVol. III. In the Press. 
 
 THE SCIENTIFIC PAPERS OF THE LATE PROF. 
 J. CLERK MAXWELL. Edited by W. D. Niven, M.A. In 2 vols. 
 Royal 4to. [Nearly ready. 
 
 A HISTORY OF THE STUDY OF MATHEMATICS 
 AT CAMBRIDGE. By W. W. RouSE Ball, M.A., Fellow and 
 Lecturer on Mathematics of Trinity College, Cambridge. Crown 
 8vo. 6s. 
 
 A TREATISE ON ANALYTICAL STATICS, by 
 
 E. J. ROUTH, Sc.D., F.R.S., Fellow of the University of London, 
 Honorary Fellow of St Peter's College, Cambridge. [In the Press. 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF THe' PORTSMOUTH COL- 
 LECTION OF BOOKS AND PAPERS written by or belonging 
 to Sir Isaac Newton. Demy 8vo. 5^-. 
 
 A TREATISE ON NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. By 
 
 Sir W. Thomson, LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., and P. G. Tait, M.A. 
 Parti. Demy 8vo. ids. Part II. Demy 8vo. 18^-. 
 
 London : C. y. Cla v &■= Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 17 
 
 ELEMENTS OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. By Pro- 
 
 fessors Sir W. Thomson and P. G. Tait. Demy 8vo. 9^-. 
 
 An elementary TREATISE on QUATERNIONS. 
 
 By P. G. Tait, M.A. yd Edition. Enlarged. Demy 8vo. \Zs. 
 
 AN ATTEMPT TO TEST THE THEORIES OF 
 CAPILLARY ACTION, by FRANCIS Bashforth, B.D., and 
 J. C. Adams, M.A., F.R.S. Demy 4to. ^i. \s. 
 
 A REVISED ACCOUNT OF THE EXPERIMENTS 
 MADE WITH THE BASHFORTH CHRONOGRAPH to find 
 the Resistance of the Air to the Motion of Projectiles, with the 
 application of the Results to the Calculation of Trajectories accord- 
 ing to J. Bernoulli's method by Francis Bashforth, B.D. 
 
 [Neaf'ly ready. 
 
 A TREATISE ON THE THEORY OF DETERMI- 
 
 NANTS and their applications in Analysis and Geometry, by R. F. 
 Scott, M.A., Fellow of St John's College. Demy 8vo. 12s. 
 
 HYDRODYNAMICS, a Treatise on the Mathematical 
 Theory of the Motion of Fluids, by H. Lamb, M.A. Demy 8vo. 12s. 
 
 THE ANALYTICAL THEORY OF HEAT, by Joseph 
 Fourier. Translated, with Notes, by A. Freeman, M.A., formerly 
 Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 12s. 
 
 PRACTICAL WORK AT THE CAVENDISH LABORA- 
 TORY. HEAT. Edited by W. N. Shaw, M.A. Demy 8vo. y. 
 
 THE ELECTRICAL RESEARCHES OF THE Hon. H. 
 Cavendish, F.R.S. Written between 177 1 and 178 1. Edited from 
 the original MSS. in the possession of the Duke of Devonshire, K. G., 
 by the late J. Clerk Maxwell, F.R.S. Demy 8vo. iSs. 
 
 COUNTERPOINT. A Practical Course of Study, by the 
 late Professor Sir G. A. Macfarren, M.A., Mus. Doc. New 
 Edition, revised. Crown 4to. 7s. 6d. 
 
 A TREATISE ON THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF 
 
 CHEMISTRY, by M. M. Pattison Muir, M.A. Second Edition. 
 Demy 8vo. 15^. 
 
 "The value of the book as a digest of the Lothar Meyer; but in this country the student 
 
 historical developments of chemical thought has had to content himself with such works as 
 
 is immense." — Acadeiny. Dr Tilden's ' Introduction to Chemical Philo- 
 
 *' Theoretical Chemistry has moved so rapidly sophy', an admirable book in its way, but rather 
 
 of late years that most of our ordinary text slender. Mr Pattison Muir having aimed at a 
 
 books have been left far behind. German more comprehensive scheme, has produced a 
 
 students, to be sure, possess an excellent guide systematic treatise on the principles of chemical 
 
 to the present state of the science in ' Die philosophy which stands far in advance of any 
 
 Modernen Theorien der Chemie' of Prof. kindred work in our language." — AthencBum. 
 
 ELEMENTARY CHEMISTRY. By M. M. Pattison 
 Muir, M.A., and Charles Slater, M.A., M.B. Crown 8vo. 4-$-. dd. 
 
 PRACTICAL CHEMISTRY. A Course of Laboratory 
 Work. By M. M. Pattison Muir, M.A., and D. J. Carnegie, B.A. 
 Crown 8vo. y. 
 
 NOTES ON QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS. Concise and 
 Explanatory. By H. J. H. Fenton, M.A., F.I.C., Demonstrator of 
 Chemistry in the University of Cambridge. Cr. 4to. New Edition, ds. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria. Lane. 
 
18 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 LECTURES ON THE PHYSIOLOGY OF PLANTS, 
 
 by S. H. Vines, Sc.D., Professor of Botany in the University of 
 Oxford. Demy 8vo. With Illustrations, lis. 
 
 "To say that Dr Vines' book is a most In erudition it stands alone among English 
 
 valuable addition to our own botanical litera- books, and will compare favourably with any 
 
 ture is but a narrow meed of praise : it is a foreign competitors." — Natnre. 
 work which will take its place as cosmopolitan : "The work forms an important contribu- 
 
 no more clear or concise discussion of the diffi- tion to the literature of the subject.. ..It will be 
 
 cult chemistry of metabolism has appeared eagerly welcomed by all students." — Academy. 
 
 A SHORT HISTORY OF GREEK MATHEMATICS. 
 
 By J. Gow, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 8vo. los. 6d. 
 
 DIOPHANTOS OF ALEXANDRIA; a Study in the 
 History of Greek Algebra. By T. L. Heath, M.A., Fellow of 
 Trinity College, Cambridge. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 " This study in the history of Greek Algebra "The most thorough account extant of 
 
 an exceedingly valuable contribution to the Diophantus's place, work, and critics." — 
 history of mathematics. " — A cadeniy. A thenceum. 
 
 THE MATHEMATICAL WORKS OF ISAAC BAR- 
 ROW, D.D. Edited by W. Whewell, D.D. Demy Svo. -js. 6d. 
 
 THE FOSSILS AND PAL^ONTOLOGICAL AFFIN- 
 ITIES OF THE NEOCOMIAN DEPOSITS OF UPWARE 
 AND BRICKHILL with Plates, being the Sedgwick Prize Essay 
 for 1879. By the late W. Keeping, M.A. Demy Svo. los. 6d. 
 
 THE BALA VOLCANIC SERIES OF CAERNAR- 
 VONSHIRE AND ASSOCIATED ROCKS, being the Sedgwick 
 Prize Essay for 1888 by A. Harker, M.A., F.R.S., Fellow of 
 St John's College. Demy Svo. js. 6d. 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF BOOKS AND PAPERS ON PRO- 
 TOZOA, CCELENTERATES, WORMS, and certain smaller groups 
 of animals, published during the years 1S61 — 1SS3, by D'Arcy W. 
 Thompson, M.A. Demy Svo. 12s. 6d. 
 
 ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS made at the Obser- 
 vatory of Cambridge by the late Rev. J. Challis, M.A. from 1846 
 to i860. 
 
 ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS from 1861 to 1865. 
 Vol. XXI. Royal 4to. 153-. From 1866 to 1869. Vol. XXII. 
 Royal 4to. 15^-. 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF THE COLLECTION OF BIRDS 
 
 formed by the late H. E. Strickland, now in the possession of the 
 University of Cambridge. By O. Salvin, M.A. Demy Svo. £i.is. 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF AUSTRALIAN FOSSILS, Strati- 
 graphically and Zoologically arranged, by R. Etheridge, Jun., 
 F.G.S. Demy Svo. 10s. 6d. 
 
 ILLUSTRATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ANATOMY, 
 VERTEBRATE AND INVERTEBRATE, for the Use of Stu- 
 dents in the Museum of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy. Second 
 Edition. Demy Svo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 London : C, £, Cla y &^ SoNS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 19 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF THE COLLECTION OF CAM- 
 BRIAN AND SILURIAN FOSSILS contained in the Geological 
 Museum of the University of Cambridge, by J. W. Salter, F.G.S. 
 With a Portrait of PROFESSOR Sedgwick. Royal 4to. ^s. dd. 
 
 CATALOGUE OF OSTEOLOGICAL SPECIMENS con- 
 tained in the Anatomical Museum of the University of Cambridge. 
 Demy 8vo. 2s, 6d. 
 
 LAW. 
 
 ELEMENTS OF THE LAW OF TORTS. A Text-book 
 for Students. By Melville M. Bigelow, Ph.D., Lecturer in the 
 Law School of the University of Boston, U.S.A. Crown 8vo. ios.6d. 
 
 " It is based on the original American edition, showing great grasp of subject ... A very full 
 
 but it is an English Text-book with English index enhances the value of this book, which 
 
 authorities; and statutes and illustrations sub- should take a prominent place among the really 
 
 stituted very generally for the American . . . The trustworthy text-books for the use of students." — 
 
 style is easy and lucid, though condensed, Law Thnes. 
 
 A SELECTION OF CASES ON THE ENGLISH LAW 
 OF CONTRACT. By Gerard Brown Finch, M.A., of Lincoln's 
 Inn, Barrister at Law. Royal 8vo. 28^. 
 
 "An invaluable guide towards the best method of legal study." — Law Quarterly 
 Revieiv. 
 
 THE INFLUENCE OF THE ROMAN LAW ON 
 THE LAW OF ENGLAND. Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 
 
 1884. By T. E. SCRUTTON, M.A. Demy 8vo. io.y. dd. 
 
 "Legal work of just the kind that a learned University should promote by its prizes."— - 
 Law Quarterly Review. 
 
 LAND IN FETTERS. Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 
 
 1885. By T. E. SCRUTTON, M.A. Demy 8vo. -js. 6d. 
 
 COMMONS AND COMMON FIELDS, OR THE HIS- 
 TORY AND POLICY OF THE LAWS RELATING TO 
 COMMONS AND ENCLOSURES IN ENGLAND. Being the 
 Yorke Prize Essay for 1886. By T. E. SCRUTTON, M.A. los. 6d. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE LAW OF TITHES IN ENGLAND. 
 
 Being the Yorke Prize Essay for 1887. By W. Easterby, B.A., LL.B., 
 St John's College and the Middle Temple. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 HISTORY OF LAND TENURE IN IRELAND. Being 
 the Yorke Prize Essay for 1888. By W. E. Montgomery, M.A., 
 LL.M. Demy 8vo. los. 6d. 
 
 AN ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY. By E. C. 
 
 Clark, LL.D,, Regius Professor of Civil Law in the University of Cam- 
 bridge, also of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law. Crown 8vo. js. 6d. 
 
 PRACTICAL JURISPRUDENCE, a Comment on Austin. 
 By E. C. Clark, LL.D. Crown 8vo. 9^. 
 
 "Damit schliesst dieses inhaltreiche und tical Jurisprudence."— Konig. C^«^»-«/3/a^Jf/«r 
 nach alien Seiten anregende Buch iiber Prac- Rechtswissenschaft. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
20 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 A SELECTION OF THE STATE TRIALS. By J. W. 
 
 Willis-Bund, M.A., LL.B., Professor of Constitutional Law and 
 History, University College, London. Crown 8vo. Vols. I. and IT, 
 In 3 parts. Now reduced to 30i-. {originally published at 46^-.) 
 
 "This work is a very useful contribution to growth and development of the law of treasofk, 
 that importdnt branch of the constitutional his- as it may be gathered from trials before the 
 tory of England which is concerned with the ordinary courts."— The Academy. 
 
 THE FRAGMENTS OF THE PERPETUAL EDICT 
 
 OF SALVIUS JULIANUS, collected, arranged, and annotated by 
 Bryan Walker, iVL.A., LL.D.,late Law Lecturerof St John's College, 
 and Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Crown 8vo. 6^. 
 
 " In the present book we have the fruits of such a student will be interested as well as per- 
 the same kind of thorough ;ind well-ordered haps surprised to find how abundantly the ex- 
 study which was brought to bear upon the notes tant fragments illustrate and clear up points 
 to the Commentaries and the Institutes . . . which have attracted his attention in the Com- 
 Hitherto the Edict has been almost inac- mentaries, or the Institutes, or the Digest." — 
 cessible to the ordinary English student, and Law Times. 
 
 BRACTON'S NOTE BOOK. A Collection of Cases de- 
 cided in the King's Courts during the reign of Henry the Third, 
 annotated by a Lawyer of that time, seemingly by Henry of Bratton. 
 Edited by F. W. Maitland of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law, 
 Downing Professor of the Laws of England. 3 vols. Demy 8vo. 
 Buckram. ^3. 3^-. Net. 
 
 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF JUS- 
 TINIAN'S DIGEST. Containing an account of its composition 
 and of the Jurists used or referred to therein. By Henry John 
 ROBY, M.A., formerly Prof, of Jurisprudence, University College, 
 London. Demy 8vo. gs. 
 
 JUSTINIAN'S DIGEST. Lib. VII., Tit. I. De Usufructu, 
 with a Legal and Philological Commentary. By H. J. ROBY, M.A. 
 Demy 8vo. 9^". 
 
 Or the Two Parts complete in One Volume. Demy 8vo. i^s. 
 
 "Not an obscurity, philological, historical, whose decisions and arguments constitute its 
 
 or legal, has been left unsifted. More inform- substance. Nowhere else can a clearer view 
 
 ing aid still has been supplied to the student of be obtained of the personal succession by which 
 
 the Digest at large by a preliminary account, the tradition of Roman legal science was sus- 
 
 covering nearly 300 pages, of the mode of tained and developed. " — The Times. 
 composition of the Digest, and of the jurists 
 
 THE COMMENTARIES OF GAIUS AND RULES OF 
 
 ULPIAN. With a Translation and Notes, by J. T. Abdy, LL.D., 
 Judge of County Courts, late Regius Professor of Laws in the 
 University of Cambridge, and the late Bryan Walker, M.A., LL.D., 
 New Edition by Bryan Walker. Crown 8vo. i6s. 
 
 " As scholars and as editors Messrs Abdy way of reference or necessary explanation, 
 
 and Walker have done their work well . . , For Thus the Roman jurist is allowed to speak for 
 
 one thing the editors deserve special commen- himself, and the reader feels that he is really 
 
 dation. They have presented Gaius to the studying Roman law in the original, and not a 
 
 reader with few notes and those merely by fanciful representation of it." — Athenceum. 
 
 THE INSTITUTES OF JUSTINIAN, translated with 
 Notes by J. T. Abdy, LL.D., and the late Bryan Walker, M.A., 
 LL.D. Crown 8vo. i6s. 
 
 "We welcome here a valuable contribution the ordinary student, whose attention is dis- 
 
 to the study of jurisprudence. The text of the tracted from the subject-matter by the dif- 
 
 Institutes is occasionally perplexing, even to ficulty of struggling through the language in 
 
 practised scholars, whose knowledge of clas- which it is contained, it will be almost indis- 
 
 sical models does not always avail them in peusable." — Spectator. 
 
 dealing with the technicalities of legal phrase- "The notes are learned and carefully com- 
 
 ology. Nor can the ordinary dictionaries be piled, and this edition will be found useful to 
 
 expected to furnish all the help that is wanted. students." — Law Times. 
 This translation will then be of great use. To 
 
 Loftdon : C.J . Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridg-e University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 21 
 
 SELECTED TITLES FROM THE DIGEST, annotated 
 
 by the late B. Walker, M.A., LL.D. Part I. Mandati vel Contra. 
 
 Digest XVII. I. Crown 8vo. 5^. 
 Part II. De Adquirendo rerum dominio and De Adquirenda vel 
 
 amittenda possessione. Digest XLI. i and 11. Crown 8vo. 6^. 
 Part III. De Condictionibus. Digest xii. i and 4 — 7 and Digest 
 
 XIII. I — 3. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 GROTIUS DE JURE BELLI ET PACIS, with the Notes 
 of Barbeyrac and others ; accompanied by an abridged Translation 
 of the Text, by W. Whewell, D.D. late Master of Trinity College. 
 3 Vols. Demy 8vo. lis. The translation separate, 6j. 
 
 HISTORICAL WORKS, &c. 
 
 THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF THE REVEREND 
 
 ADAM SEDGWICK, LL.D., F.R.S., Fellow of Trinity College, 
 Cambridge, and Woodwardian Professor of Geology from 18 18 to 
 1873. (Dedicated, by special permission, to Her Majesty the Queen.) 
 By John Willis Clark, M.A., F.S.A., formerly Fellow of Trinity 
 College, and Thomas M^Kenny Hughes, M.A., Woodwardian 
 Professor of Geology. 2 vols. Demy 8vo. {Nearly ready. 
 
 MEMORIALS OF THE LIFE OF GEORGE ELWES 
 CORRIE, D.D., formerly Master of Jesus College, Cambridge. 
 Edited by M. Holroyd. Demy 8vo. lis. 
 
 THE DESPATCHES OF EARL GOWER, English Am- 
 bassador at the court of Versailles from June 1790 to August 1792, 
 to which are added the Despatches of Mr Lindsay and Mr Munro, 
 and the Diary of Lord Palmerston in France during July and 
 August 1 79 1. Edited by Oscar Browning, M. A. Demy8vo. 15^. 
 
 LIFE AND TIMES OF STEIN, OR GERMANY AND 
 
 PRUSSIA IN THE NAPOLEONIC AGE, by J. R. Seeley, 
 M.A., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of 
 Cambridge, with Portraits and Maps. 3 Vols. Demy 8vo. 30^-. 
 
 "Dr Busch's volume has made people think feel very pardonable pride at seeing one of 
 
 and talk even more than usual of Prince Bis- their countrynien undertake to write the his- 
 
 marck, and Professor Seeley's very learned wrork tory of a period from the investigation of 
 
 on Stein will turn attention to an earlier and an which even laborious Germans are apt to 
 
 almost equally eminent German statesman.... shrink." — Times. 
 
 He was one, perhaps the chief, of the illus- " In a notice of this kind scant justice can 
 
 trious group of strangers who came to the be done to a work like the one before us; no 
 
 rescue of Prussia in her darkest hour, about short resume can give even the most meagre 
 
 the time of the inglorious Peace of Tilsit, and notion of the contents of these volumes, which 
 
 who laboured to put life and order into her contain no page that is superfluous, and none 
 
 dispirited army, her impoverished finances, and that is uninteresting." — Athenceum. 
 her inefficient Civil Service. Englishmen will 
 
 THE GROWTH OF ENGLISH INDUSTRY AND 
 COMMERCE DURING THE EARLY AND MIDDLE AGES. 
 By W. Cunningham, D.D., University Lecturer. Demy 8vo. i6j". 
 
 " Dr Cunningham's book is one of excep- marshalling the varied facts in the vast field 
 
 tional interest and usefulness. It cannot be which has been traversed, and by singular 
 
 too highly praised. It is characterised by re- clearness and fehcity of expression." — Scots- 
 
 search and thought, by a remarkable power of man. 
 
 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES OF GREEK HISTORY. 
 
 Accompanied by a short narrative of events, with references to the 
 sources of information and extracts from the ancient authorities, by 
 Carl Peter. Translated from the German by G. Chawner, 
 M.A., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. Demy 4to. los. 
 
 London : C. ^. Clav dr' Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 THE ARCHITFXTURAL HISTORY OF THE UNI- 
 VERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE AND OF THE COLLEGES OF 
 CAMBRIDGE AND ETON, by the late Robert Willis, M.A. 
 F.R.S., Jacksonian Professor in the University of Cambridge. Edited 
 with large Additions and brought up to the present time by John 
 Willis Clark, M.A., formerly Fellow of Trinity College, Cam- 
 bridge. Four Vols. Super Royal 8vo. £6. ds. 
 
 Also a limited Edition of the same, consisting of 120 numbered 
 Copies only, large paper Quarto ; the woodcuts and steel engravings 
 mounted on India paper ; price Twenty-five Guineas net each set. 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE FROM THE 
 EARLIEST TIMES TO THE ROYAL INJUNCTIONS OF 
 1535, by J. B. MULLINGER, M.A., Lecturer on History and Librarian 
 to St John's College. Part I. Demy 8vo. (734 pp.), lis. 
 
 Part II. From the Royal Injunctions of 1535 to the Accession of 
 
 Charles the First. Demy 8vo. \Zs. 
 
 " He shews in the statutes of the Colleges, "Mr MuUinger displays an admirable 
 
 the internal organization of the University, its thoroughness in his work. Nothing could be 
 
 connection with national problems, its studies, more exhaustive and conscientious than his 
 
 its social life. All this he combines in a method: and his style. ..is picturesque and 
 
 form which is eminently readable."— Prof. elevated." — Times. 
 Creighton in Coiit. Review. 
 
 SCHOLAE ACADEMICAE: some Account of the Studies 
 at the English Universities in the Eighteenth Century. By C. 
 Wordsworth, M.A., Fellow of Peterhouse. Demy 8vo. \os. 6d. 
 
 " Mr Wordsworth has collected a great ... To a great extent it is purely a book of re- 
 quantity of minute and curious information ference. and as such it will be of permanent 
 about the working of Cambridge institutions in value for the historical knowledge of English 
 the last century, with an occasional comparison education and learning." — Saturday Review. 
 of the corresponding state of things at Oxford. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE COLLEGE OF ST JOHN THE 
 
 EVANGELIST, by Thomas Baker, B.D., Ejected Fellow. Edited 
 by John E. B. Mayor, M.A. Two Vols. Demy 8vo. 24J. 
 
 HISTORY OF NEPAL, translated by MUNSHI SHEW 
 Shunker Singh and Pandit Shri Gunanand; edited with an 
 Introductory Sketch of the Country and People by Dr D. Wright, 
 late Residency Surgeon at Kathmandu, and with facsimiles of native 
 drawings, and portraits of Sir JUNG BAHADUR, the King OF Nepal, 
 &c. Super- royal 8vo. \os. 6d. 
 
 KINSHIP AND MARRIAGE IN EARLY ARABIA, 
 
 by W. Robertson Smith, M.A., LL.D., Professor of Arabic and 
 Fellow of Christ's College, Crown 8vo. js. 6d. 
 
 "It would be superfluous to praise a book early history can afford to be •wiih.out Kinship 
 so learned and masterly as Professor Robertson in Early Arabia.^' — Nature. 
 Smith's ; it is enough to say that no student of 
 
 TRAVELS IN ARABIA DESERTA IN 1876 AND 
 1877. By Charles M. Doughty, of Gonville and Caius College. 
 With Illustrations and a Map. 2 vols. Demy 8vo. £t,. y. 
 
 "This is in several respects a remarkable "We judge this book to be the most re- 
 book. It records the ten years' travels of the markable record of adventure and research 
 author throughout Northern Arabia, in the which has been published to this generation." 
 Hejas and Nejd, from Syria to Mecca. No —Spectator. 
 
 doubt this region has been visited by previous "Its value as a storehouse of knowledge 
 
 travellers, but none, we venture to think, have simply cannot be exaggerated." — Saturday 
 
 done their work with so much thoroughness or Review. 
 with more enthusiasm and love." — Times. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v <Sr* Sons, Cainbridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 23 
 
 A JOURNEY OF LITERARY and ARCH^OLOGICAL 
 
 RESEARCH IN NEPAL AND NORTHERN INDIA, during 
 the Winter of 1884-5. By Cecil Bendall, M.A., Professor of 
 Sanskrit in University College, London. Demy 8vo. \os. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA. By J. E. C. 
 
 MUNRO, LL.M., Professor of Law and Political Economy at Vic- 
 toria University, Manchester. Demy 8vo. \os. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE HISTORICAL ESSAYS. 
 
 POLITICAL PARTIES IN ATHENS DURING THE 
 
 PELOPONNESIAN WAR, by L. Whibley, M.A., Fellow of 
 Pembroke College, Cambridge. (Prince Consort Dissertation, 1888.) 
 Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 7.s. 6d. 
 
 POPE GREGORY THE GREAT AND HIS RELA- 
 TIONS WITH GAUL, by F. W. Kellett, M.A., Sidney Sussex 
 College. (Prince Consort Dissertation, 1888.) Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 THE CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERIMENTS OF THE 
 COMMONWEALTH, being the Thirlwall Prize Essay for 1889, 
 by E. Jenks, B.A., LL.B., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. 
 Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS. 
 
 THE LITERARY REMAINS OF ALBRECHT DURER, 
 
 by W. M. Conway. With Transcripts from the British Museum 
 MSS., and Notes by LiNA ECKENSTEIN. Royal 8vo. 21s. {The 
 Edition is limited to $00 copies.) 
 
 GRAY AND HIS FRIENDS. Letters and Relics in great 
 part hitherto unpublished. Edited by the Rev. D. C. Tovey, M.A. 
 
 [In the Press. 
 
 A LATIN-ENGLISH DICTIONARY. Printed from the 
 (Incomplete) MS. of the late T. H. Key, M.A., F.R.S. Cr. 4to. 31^-. 6d. 
 
 THE COLLECTED PAPERS OF HENRY BRAD- 
 SHAW, including his Memoranda and Communications read before 
 the Cambridge Antiquarian Society. With i^^ facsimiles. Edited 
 by F. J. H. Jenkinson, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College. Demy 
 8vo. 16^-. 
 
 THE LATIN HEPTATEUCH. Published piecemeal by 
 the French printer William Morel (1560) and the French Bene- 
 dictines E. Martene (1733) and J. B. Pitra (1852—88). Critically 
 reviewed by John E. B. Mayor, M.A., Professor of Latin in the 
 University of Cambridge. Demy 8vo. \os. 6d. 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF ANCIENT MARBLES IN GREAT 
 BRITAIN, by Prof. Adolf Michaelis. Translated by C. A. M. 
 Fennell, Litt. D. Royal 8vo. Roxburgh (Morocco back), £2. 2s. 
 
 "The book is beautifully executed, and with grateful to the Syndics of the University Press 
 
 its few handsome plates, and excellent indexes, for the liberal facilities afforded by them to- 
 
 does much credit to the Cambridge Press, All wards the production of this important volume 
 
 lovers of true art and of good work should be by Professor Michaelis." — Saturday Revie^v. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v &^ SONS^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lanr, 
 
24 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE TEXTUAL CRITICISM 
 
 OF THE DIVINA COMMEDIA. Including the complete col- 
 lation throughout the Inferno of all the MSS. at Oxford and Cam- 
 bridge. By the Rev. Edward Moore, D.D. Demy 8vo. 2\s. 
 
 RHODES IN ANCIENT TIMES. By Cecil Torr, M.A. 
 
 With six plates. Demy 8vo. \os. 6d. 
 
 RHODES IN MODERN TIMES. By the same Author. 
 With three plates. Demy 8vo. Sj. 
 
 THE WOODCUTTERS OF THE NETHERLANDS 
 
 during the last quarter of the Fifteenth Century. In 3 parts. I. His- 
 tory of the Woodcutters. II. Catalogue of their Woodcuts. III. List of 
 Books containing Woodcuts. By W. M. CONWAY. DemySvo. ioj. 6^^. 
 
 THE LITERATURE OF THE FRENCH RENAIS- 
 SANCE. An Introductory Essay. By A. A. Tilley, M.A. Cr. 8vo. 6s. 
 
 FROM SHAKESPEARE TO POPE: an Inquiry into 
 the causes and phenomena of the rise of Classical Poetry in England. 
 By Edmund Gosse, M.A. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 CHAPTERS ON ENGLISH METRE. By Rev. Joseph 
 
 B. Mayor, M.A. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 A GRAMMAR OF THE IRISH LANGUAGE. By Prof. 
 
 WiNDiscH. TranslatedbyDr Norman Moore. Crown 8vo. 7s.6d. 
 
 LECTURES ON TEACHING, delivered in the University 
 of Cambridge in the Lent Term, 1880. By J. G. FlTCH, M.A., LL.D. 
 Her Majesty's Inspector of Training Colleges. Cr. 8vo. New Edit. 5^-. 
 
 "Mr Fitch's book covers so wide a field hest existing vade mecufn for the teacher." — 
 and touches on so many burning questions that Pall Mall Gazette. 
 we must be content to recommend it as the 
 
 LECTURES ON THE GROWTH AND MEANS OF 
 TRAINING THE INTELLECTUAL FACULTY, delivered in the 
 University of Cambridge. By Francis Warner, M.D., F.R.C.P. 
 Crown 8vo. 4^-. 6d. 
 
 OCCASIONAL ADDRESSES ON EDUCATIONAL 
 
 SUBJECTS. By S. S. Laurie, M.A., LL.D. Crown 8vo. 5^. 
 
 A MANUAL OF CURSIVE SHORTHAND. By H. L. 
 
 Callendar, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 2J. 
 
 A SYSTEM OF PHONETIC SPELLING ADAPTED 
 
 TO ENGLISH. By H. L. Callendar, M.A. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 6d. 
 
 A PRIMER OF CURSIVE SHORTHAND. By H. L. 
 
 Callendar, M.A. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 6d. 
 
 ESSAYS FROM THE SPECTATOR IN CURSIVE 
 SHORTHAND. By H. L. Callendar, M.A. Ex. Fcap. 8vo. 6d. 
 
 READING PRACTICE IN CURSIVE SHORTHAND. 
 Easy Extracts for Beginners. The Gospel according to St Mark, 
 (First half). The Vicar of Wakefield. Chaps. I.— V. Alice in 
 Wonderland. Chap. VII. 3^. each. 
 
 For other books on Education^ see Pitt Press Series^ p. 39. 
 
 London: C. y. Cr.AV &^ Sons, Cnwhridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNlVEkSlTV PRESS. 25 
 
 STUDIES IN THE LITERARY RELATIONS OF 
 ENGLAND WITH GERMANY IN THE SIXTEENTH 
 CENTURY. By C. H. Herford, M.A. Crown 8vo. 9^. 
 
 ADMISSIONS TO GONVILLE AND CAIUS COLLEGE 
 
 in the University of Cambridge March 1558 — 9 to Jan. 1678—9. 
 Edited by J. Venn, Sc.D., and S. C. Venn. Demy 8vo. los. 
 
 ECCLESIAE LONDINO-BATAVAE ARCHIVVM. 
 
 TOMVS Primvs. Abrahami Ortelii et virorum eruditorum ad 
 eundem et ad Jacobvm Colivm Orteltanvm Epistulae, 1524— 
 1628. ToMVS Secvndvs. EPISTVLAE ET TRACTATVS cum 
 Reformationis turn Ecclesiae Londino-Batavae Historiam Illustrantes 
 1544 — 1622. Ex autographis mandante Ecclesia Londino-Batava 
 edidit Joannes Henricvs Hessels. Demy 4to. Each volume, 
 separately, £2,. los. Taken together ^5. 5^-. Net. 
 
 CATALOGUE OF THE HEBREW MANUSCRIPTS 
 
 preserved in the University Library, Cambridge. By Dr S. M. 
 Schiller-Szinessy. Volume I. containing Section I. The Holy 
 Scriptures; Section II. Coimnentaries on the Bible. Demy 8vo. 9^. 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF THE MANUSCRIPTS preserved 
 in the Library of the University of Cambridge. Demy 8vo. 5 Vols. 
 los. each. INDEX TO THE CATALOGUE. Demy 8vo. los. 
 
 A CATALOGUE OF ADVERSARIA and printed books 
 preserved in the Library of the University of Cambridge. 3J. 6d. 
 
 THE ILLUMINATED MANUSCRIPTS IN THE Li- 
 brary of the Fitzwilliam Museum, Catalogued with Descriptions, and 
 an Introduction, by W. G. Searle, M.A. Demy 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 A CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF THE GRACES, 
 
 Documents, and other Papers in the University Registry which 
 concern the University Library. Demy 8vo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 CATALOGUS BIBLIOTHECE BURCKHARDTIAN.E. 
 
 Demy 4to. 5 J. 
 GRADUATI CANTABRIGIENSES : SIVE CATA- 
 LOGUS exhibens nomina eorum quos gradu quocunque ornavit 
 Academia Cantabrigiensis (1800— 1884). Cura H. R. LUARD S. T. P. 
 DemySvo. 12s. 6d. 
 
 STATUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE 
 
 and for the Colleges therein, made, published and approved (1878 — 
 1882) under the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge Act, 1877. 
 With an Appendix. Demy 8vo. i6s. 
 
 STATUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. 
 
 With Acts of Parliament relating to the University. 8vo. 3J. 6d. 
 
 ORDINANCES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAM- 
 BRIDGE. Demy 8vo., cloth. 7s. 6d. 
 
 TRUSTS, STATUTES AND DIRECTIONS affecting 
 (i) The Professorships of the University. (2) The Scholarships 
 and Prizes. (3) Other Gifts and Endowments. Demy 8vo. $3. 
 
 COMPENDIUM of UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS. 6d. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v <^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
36 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 Ci)e Cambriliae %Mt for 
 ^cl)i3ols ann Colleges* 
 
 General Editor : The Very Reverend J. J. S. Perowne, D.D., 
 Dean of Peterborough. 
 
 " It is difficult to commend too highly this excellent series." — Guardian. 
 
 " The modesty of the general title of this series has, we believe, led many to misunderstand 
 its character and underrate its value. The books are well suited for study in the upper forms of 
 our best schools, but not the less are they adapted to the wants of all Bible students who are not 
 specialists. We doubt, indeed, whether any of the numerous popular commentaries recently 
 issued in this country will be found more serviceable for general use." — Academy. 
 
 "One of the most popular and useful literary enterprises of the nineteenth century." — Baptist 
 Magazine. 
 
 " Of great value. The whole series of comments for schools is highly esteemed by students 
 capable of forming a judgment. The books are scholarly without being pretentious : information 
 is so given as to be easily understood." — Sword and Trowel. 
 
 The Very Reverend J. J. S. Perowne, D.D., Dean of Peterborough, has 
 undertaken the general editorial supervision of the work, assisted by a staff of 
 eminent coadjutors. Some of the books have been already edited or undertaken 
 by the following gentlemen : 
 
 Rev. A. Carr, M.A., late Assistant Master at Wellington College, 
 
 Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D., Canon of Rochester. 
 
 Rev. S. Cox, Nottingham. 
 
 Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D., Professor of Hebrew^ Edinburgh. 
 
 The Ven. F. W. Farrar, D.D., Archdeacon of Westminster. 
 
 Rev. C. D. GiNSBURG, LL.D. 
 
 Rev. A. E. Humphreys, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. 
 
 Rev. A. F. KiRKPATRiCK, B.D., Fellow of Trinity College, Regius Professor 
 
 of Hebrew. 
 Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A., late Professor at St David's College, Lampeter. 
 Rev. J. R. LuMBY, D.D., Norrisian Professor of Divinity. 
 Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D., Warden of St Augustine's College, Canterbury. 
 Rev. H. C. G. Moule, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Principal of 
 
 Ridley Hall, Cambridge. 
 Rev. E. H. Perowne, D.D., Master of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. 
 The Ven. T. T. Perowne, B.D., Archdeacon of Norwich. 
 Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D., Master of University College, Durham. 
 The Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D., Dean of Wells. 
 Rev. H. E. Ryle, M.A., Hulsean Professor of Divinity. 
 Rev. W. SiMCOX, M. A., late Rector of Weyhill, Hants. 
 W. Robertson Smith, M.A., Professor of Arabic and Fellotu of Christ's 
 
 College. 
 The Very Rev. H. D. M. Spence, M.A., Dean of Gloucester. 
 Rev. A. W. Streane, M.A., Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 27 
 
 THE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS & COLLEGES. Cont. 
 
 Now Ready. Clothj Extra Fcap. Svo. 
 
 THE BOOK OF JOSHUA. By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. 
 
 With 2 Maps. 2s. 6d. 
 
 THE BOOK OF JUDGES. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 
 
 With Map. y. 6d. 
 THE FIRST BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the Rev. Professor 
 
 KiRKPATRiCK, B.D. With Map. 3^. 6d. 
 THE SECOND BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the Rev. Professor 
 
 Kirkpatrick, B.D. With 2 Maps. 3^. 6d. 
 THE FIRST BOOK OF KINGS. By Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D. 3^.6^. 
 THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS. By the same Editor, ^s. 6d. 
 THE BOOK OF JOB. By the Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. 5^. 
 
 THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES. By the Very Rev. E. H. 
 
 Plumptre, D.D. 5J-. 
 THE BOOK OF JEREMIAH. By the Rev. A. W. Streane, 
 
 M.A. With Map. 4^. 6d. 
 THE BOOK OF HOSEA. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D. 3^. 
 
 THE BOOKS OF OBADIAH AND JONAH. By Archdeacon 
 
 Perowne. 2s. 6d. 
 THE BOOK OF MIC AH. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, D.D. i.f. 6d. 
 
 THE BOOKS OF HAGGAI, ZECHARIAH AND MALACHL 
 
 By Archdeacon Perowne. ^s. 6d. 
 THE BOOK OF MALACHL By Archdeacon Perowne. i^. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By the 
 
 Rev. A. Carr, M.A. With 2 Maps. 2s. 6d. 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By the Rev. 
 G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 4 Maps. 2s. 6d. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon 
 
 F. W. Farrar. With 4 Maps. 4J-. 6d. 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN. By the Rev. 
 
 A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. With 4 Maps. 4J. 6d. 
 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By the Rev. Professor 
 
 Lumby, D.D. With 4 Maps. 4^. 6d. 
 THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. By the Rev. H. C. G. 
 
 MouLE, M.A. 3J. 6d. 
 THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. 
 
 J. J. Lias, M.A. With a Map and Plan. 2s. 
 THE SECOND EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the 
 
 Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 2s. 
 
 THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS. By the Rev. H. C G. 
 
 MouLE, M.A. 2s. 6d. 
 THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS. By the Rev. H. C. G. 
 
 MouLE, M.A. 2s. 6d. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
28 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 THE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS & COLLEGES. Cont. 
 
 THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By Arch. Farrar. 3^. 6^. 
 
 THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF ST JAMES. By the Very Rev. 
 
 E. H. Plumptre, D.D. is. 6d. 
 THE EPISTLES OF ST PETER AND ST JUDE. By the 
 
 same Editor. 2s. 6d. 
 THE EPISTLES OF ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, 
 
 M.A., D.D. y.6d. 
 
 Preparing. 
 
 THE BOOK OF GENESIS. By the Very Rev. the Dean of 
 
 Peterborough. 
 
 THE BOOKS OF EXODUS, NUMBERS AND DEUTERO- 
 NOMY. By the Rev. C. D. Ginsburg, LL.D. 
 
 THE BOOKS OF EZRA AND NEHEMIAH. By the Rev. 
 
 Prof. Ryle, M.A. 
 THE BOOK OF PSALMS. By the Rev. Prof. Kirkpatrick, B.D. 
 THE BOOK OF ISAIAH. By Prof. W. Robertson Smith, M.A. 
 THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL. By the Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. 
 
 THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS. By the Rev. E. H. 
 Perowne, D.D. 
 
 THE EPISTLES TO THE COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON. 
 
 By the Rev. H. C. G. Moule, M.A. 
 
 THE EPISTLES TO TIMOTHY AND TITUS. By the Rev. 
 
 A. E. Humphreys, M.A. 
 
 THE BOOK OF REVELATION. By the Rev. W. Simcox, M.A. 
 
 Cfte Smaller Cambridge asible lot ^cbonfe* 
 
 The Smaller Cambridge Bible for Schools will form an entirely new 
 series of commentaries on some selected books of the Bible. It is expected that they 
 will be prepared for the most part by the Editors of the larger series ( The Cambridge 
 Bible for Schools and Colleges). The volumes will be issued at a low price ^ and will 
 be suitable to the requirements of preparatory avd elementary schools. 
 
 Now ready. Price \s. each. 
 
 THE FIRST AND SECOND BOOKS OF SAMUEL. By 
 Rev. Prof. Kirkpatrick, B.D. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By Rev. 
 A. Carr, M.A. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By Rev. 
 G. F. Maclear, D.D. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon 
 Farrar, D.D. 
 
 London : C. y. Cla y ^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. ig 
 
 Cfte CambrflJffe (Bvttk Cestament for ^rftools; 
 anti Colleges;, 
 
 with a Revised Text, based on the most recent critical authorities, and 
 
 English Notes, prepared under the direction of the General Editor, 
 
 The Very Reverend J. J. S. PEROWNE, D.D. 
 
 IVow Ready. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By the 
 
 Rev. A. Carr, M.A. With 4 Maps. \s. 6d. 
 
 " Copious illustrations, gathered from a great variety of sources, make his notes a very valu- 
 able aid to the student. They are indeed remarkably interesting, while all explanations on 
 meanings, applications, and the like are distinguished by their lucidity and good sense " — 
 Pall Mall Gazette. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By the Rev. 
 
 G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 3 Maps. 4^. 6^. 
 
 ''The Cambridge Greek Testament, of which Dr Maclear's edition of the Gospel according to 
 St Mark is a volume, certainly supplies a want. Without pretending to compete with the leading 
 commentaries, or to embody very much original research, it forms a most satisfactory introduction 
 to the study of the New Testament in the original . . . Dr Maclear's introduction contains all that 
 is known of St Mark's life, an account of the circumstances in which the Gospel was composed, 
 an excellent sketch of the special characteristics of this Gospel ; an analysis, and a chapter on the 
 text of the New Testament generally . . . The work is completed by three good maps." — Satur- 
 day Review. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon 
 Farrar. With 4 Maps. 6j. 
 
 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. 
 
 Plummer, M.A., D.D. With 4 Maps. ds. 
 
 "A valuable addition has also been made to 'The Cambridge Greek Testament for Schools,' 
 Dr Plummer's notes on 'the Gospel according to St John' are scholarly, concise, and instructive, 
 and embody the results of much thought and wide reading." — Expositor. 
 
 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By the Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D., 
 with 4 Maps. ds. 
 
 THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the 
 
 Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 3.^. 
 
 THE SECOND EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the 
 
 Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. [Preparing. 
 
 THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By Arch. Farrar, D.D. 
 3J. 6d. 
 
 THE EPISTLES OF ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, 
 M.A., D.D. 4.f. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v ^t* Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 
 Ave Maria Lane 
 
30 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 THE PITT PRESS SERIES. 
 
 ^Copies of the Pitt Press Series may generally be obtained bound in two parts for 
 Class use, the text and notes in separate volumes.^ 
 
 I. GREEK. 
 
 ARISTOPHANES— AVES—PLUTUS—RANAE. With 
 
 English Notes and Introduction by W. C. Green, M.A., late Assistant 
 Master at Rugby School. 3J. <id. each. 
 
 EURIPIDES. HERACLEID^. With Introduction and 
 
 Explanatory Notes by E. A. Beck, M.A., Fellow of Trinity Hall. y. 6d. 
 
 EURIPIDES. HERCULES FURENS. With Intro- 
 
 ductions, Notes and Analysis. By A. Gray, M.A., Fellow of Jesus College, 
 and J. T. Hutchinson, M.A., Christ's College. New Edition. 2s. 
 
 EURIPIDES. HIPPOLYTUS. By W. S. Hadley, M.A. 
 
 Fellow of Pembroke College, is. 
 
 EURIPIDES. IPHIGENEIA IN AULIS. By C. E. S. 
 
 Headlam, B.A., Fellow of Trinity Hall. 2s. 6d. 
 
 HERODOTUS, Book V. Edited with Notes, Introduction 
 
 and Maps by E. S. Shuckburgh, M. A., late Fellow of Emmanuel College. 3^. 
 
 HERODOTUS, Book VI. By the same Editor. 4^-. 
 HERODOTUS, Book VIIL, Chaps. 1—90. By the same 
 
 Editor, y. 6d. 
 "We could not wish for a better introduction to Herodotus." — Jourtial of Education. 
 
 HERODOTUS, Book IX., Chaps. 1—89. By the same 
 
 Editor. 3J. dd. 
 
 HOMER— ODYSSEY, Books IX. X. With Introduction, 
 
 Notes and Appendices. By G. M. Edwards, M.A., Fellow and Classical 
 Lecturer of Sidney Sussex College. 2s. 6d. each. 
 
 HOMER— ODYSSEY, Book XXI. By the same Editor. 2s. 
 LUCIANI SOMNIUM CHARON PISCATOR ET DE 
 
 LUCTU, with English Notes by W. E. Heitland, M.A., Fellow of 
 St John's College, Cambridge. New Edition, with Appendix. 3^. 6d. 
 
 PLATONIS APOLOGIA SOCRATIS. With Introduction, 
 
 Notes and Appendices by J. Adam, M.A., Fellow and Classical Lecturer of 
 Emmanuel College. 3^. 6d. 
 "A worthy representative of English Scholarship," — Classical Review. 
 
 CRITO. With Introduction, Notes and Appendix. 
 
 By the same Editor. 2s. 6d. 
 
 "Mr Adam, already known as the author of a careful and scholarly edition of the Apology 
 of Plato, will, we think, add to his reputation by his work upon the Crito." — AcadetJty. 
 
 "A scholarly edition of a dialogue which has never been really well edited in English." — 
 Guardian. 
 
 EUTHYPHRO. By the same Editor. 2s. 6d. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y &> Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse., 
 Ave Mai'ia Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 31 
 
 PLUTARCH. LIVES OF THE GRACCHL With Intro- 
 duction, Notes and Lexicon by Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 6s. 
 
 PLUTARCH. LIFE OF NICIAS. With Introduction 
 
 and Notes. By Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. e^s. 
 
 "This edition is as careful and thorough as Dr Holden's work always is." — Spectator. 
 
 PLUTARCH. LIFE OF SULLA. With Introduction, 
 
 Notes, and Lexicon. By the Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 6s. 
 
 PLUTARCH. LIFE OF TIMOLEON. With Introduc- 
 tion, Notes and Lexicon. By Rev. Hubert A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 6s. 
 
 SOPHOCLES.— OEDIPUS TYRANNUS. School Edition, 
 
 w\\\\ Introduction and Commentary, by R. C. Jebb, Litt. D., LL.D., Regius 
 Professor of Greek in the University of Cambridge. 4^. 6d. 
 
 THUCYDIDES. Book VII. With Notes and Introduction. 
 
 By H. R. Tottenham, M. A., Fellow of St John's College. \In the Press. 
 
 XENOPHON.— AGESILAUS. The Text revised with 
 
 Critical and Explanatory Notes, Introduction, Analysis, and Indices. By 
 H. Hailstone, M.A., late Scholar of Peterhouse. is. 6d. 
 
 XENOPHON.— ANABASIS, Books I. III. IV. and V. 
 
 With a Map and English Notes by Alfred Pretor, M.A., Fellovi^ of 
 St Catharine's College, Cambridge, is. each. 
 "Mr Pretor's 'Anabasis of Xenophon, Book IV.' displays a union of accurate Cambridge 
 scholarship, with experience of what is required by learners gained in examining middle-class 
 schools. The text is large and clearly printed, and the notes explain all difficulties. . . . Mr 
 Pretor's notes seem to be all that could be wished as regards grammar, geography, and other 
 matters." — The Academy. 
 
 BOOKS II. VI. and VII. By the same. 2s. 6d. each. 
 
 "Had we to introduce a young Greek scholar to Xenophon^ we should esteem ourselves 
 fortunate in having Pretor's text-book as our chart and guide." — Contemporary Review. 
 
 XENOPHON.— ANABASIS. By A. Pretor, M.A., Text 
 
 and Notes, complete in two Volumes. 7^. 6d. 
 
 XENOPHON.— CYROPAEDEIA. Books 1. 11. With In- 
 troduction, Notes and Map. By Rev. H. A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 
 1 vols. Vol. I. Text. Vol. II. Notes. 6s. 
 "The work is worthy of the editor's well-earned reputation for scholarship and industry."— 
 A theneeum. 
 
 Books III., IV., V. By the same Editor. 5^. 
 
 " Dr Holden's Commentary is equally good in history and in scholarship." — Saturday Review. 
 
 Book VI. By the same Editor. [Nearly ready. 
 
 M. LATIN. 
 
 BEDA'S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY, BOOKS 
 
 III., IV., the Text from the very ancient MS. in the Cambridge University 
 Library, collated with six other MSS. Edited, with a life from the German of 
 Ebert, and with Notes, &c. by J. E. B. Mayor, M.A., Professor of Latin, 
 and J. R. Lumby, D.D., Norrisian Professor of Divinity. Revised edition. 
 
 V' ^d. Books I. and II. In the Press, 
 
 "In Bede's works Englishmen can go back to origines of their history, unequalled for 
 form and matter by any modern European nation. Prof. Mayor has done good service in ren- 
 dering a part of Bede*s greatest work accessible to those who can read Latin with ease. He 
 has adorned this edition of the third and fourth books of the * Ecclesiastical History' with that 
 amazing erudition for which he is unrivalled among Englishmen and rarely equalled by Germans. 
 And however interesting and valuable the text may be, we can certainly apply to his notes 
 the expression, La sattce vaut mieux que le poisson. They are literally crammed with interest- 
 ing information about early English life. For though ecclesiastical in name, Bede's history treats 
 of all parts of the national life, since the Church had points of contact with all." — Examiner. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y &= Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
32 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. I. With 
 
 Maps and English Notes by A. G. Peskett, M.A., Fellow of Magdalene 
 College, Cambridge, is. 6d. 
 
 CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. II. III. 
 
 By the same Editor. 2s. 
 
 CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. I. II. IIL 
 
 by the same Editor. -i,s. 
 
 CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. IV. and V. 
 
 and COMMENT. VII. by the same Editor. 2s. each. 
 
 CAESAR. DE BELLO GALLICO COMMENT. VI. and 
 
 COMMENT. VIII. by the same Editor, is. 6d. each. 
 
 CAESAR. DE BELLO CIVILI COMMENT. I. by the 
 
 same Editor. [/;, ^/^^ p^.^^^ 
 
 CICERO. ACTIO PRIMA IN C VERREM. With 
 
 Introduction and Notes. By H. Cowie, M. A., Fellow of St John's College, 
 Cambridge, is. 6d. 
 
 CICERO. DE AMICITIA. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D., 
 
 Fellow and Tutor of Gonville and Caius College. New Edition. 3^. 6d. 
 
 "Mr Reid has decidedly attained his aim, namely, 'a thorough examination of the Latinity 
 
 of the dialogue. ' The revision of the text is most valuable, and comprehends sundry 
 
 acute corrections. . . . This volume, like Mr Reid's other editions, is a solid gain to the scholar- 
 ship of the country." — Atheiiceum. 
 
 "A more distinct gain to scholarship is Mr Reid's able and thorough edition of the De 
 Amicitid of Cicero, a work of which, whether we regard the exhaustive introduction or the 
 instructive and most suggestive commentary, it would be difficult to speak too highly. . . . When 
 we come to the commentary, we are only amazed by its fulness in proportion to its bulk. 
 Nothing is overlooked which can tend to enlarge the learner's general knowledge of Ciceronian 
 Latin or to elucidate the text."— Saturday Review. 
 
 CICERO. DE SENECTUTE. Edited by J. S. Reid, 
 
 Litt.D. Revised Edition. 7,s. 6d. 
 
 "The notes are excellent and scholarlike, adapted for the upper forms of public schools, and 
 ikely to be useful even to more advanced students." — Guardian. 
 
 CICERO. DIVINATIO IN Q. CAECILIUM ET ACTIO 
 
 PRIMA IN C. VERREM. With Introduction and Notes by W. E. 
 Heitland, M.A., and Herbert Cowie, M.A., Fellows of St John's 
 College, Cambridge. 3J. 
 
 CICERO. PHILIPPICA SECUNDA. With Introduction 
 
 and Notes by A. G. Peskett, M.A., Fellow of Magdalene College. 3^. 6d. 
 
 CICERO. PRO ARCHIA POETA. Edited by J. S. Reid, 
 
 Litt.D. Revised Edition. 2s. 
 
 " It is an admirable specimen of careful editing. An Introduction tells us everything we could 
 wish to know about Archias, about Cicero's connexion with him, about the merits of the trial, and 
 the genuineness of the speech. The text is well and carefully printed. The notes are clear and 
 scholar-like. . . . No boy can master this little volume without feeling that he has advanced a long 
 step in scholarship." — The Academy. 
 
 CICERO. PRO BALBO. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D. 
 
 IS. 6d. 
 " We are bound to recognize the pains devoted in the annotation of these two orations to the 
 minute and thorough study of their Latinity, both in the ordinary notes and in the textual 
 appendices." — Saturday Review. 
 
 London: C. J. Clav &= Sons, Cambridge University P7'ess Warehouse., 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 33 
 
 CICERO. PRO MILONE, with a Translation of Asconius' 
 
 Introduction, Marginal Analysis and English Notes. Edited by the Rev. 
 John Smyth Purton, B.D., late President and Tutor of St Catharine's 
 College. IS. 6d. 
 "The editorial work is excellently done." — The Acadetny. 
 
 CICERO. PRO MURENA. With Enghsh Introduction 
 
 and Notes. By W. E. Heitland, M.A., Fellow and Classical Lecturer 
 of St John's College, Cambridge. Second Edition, carefully revised. 3^. 
 
 "Those students are to be deemed fortunate who have to read Cicero's lively and brilliant 
 oration for L. Murena with Mr Heitland's handy edition, which may be pronounced 'four-square* 
 in point of equipment, and which has, not without good reason, attained the honours of a 
 second edition." — Saturday Review. 
 
 CICERO. PRO PLANCIO. Edited by H. A. Holden, 
 
 LL.D., Examiner in Greek to the University of London. Second Edition. 
 
 CICERO. PRO SULLA. Edited by J. S. Reid, Litt.D. 
 
 3J. dd. 
 " Mr Reid is so well known to scholars as a commentator on Cicero that a new work from him 
 scarcely needs any commendation of ours. Hjs edition of the speech Pro Sulla is fully equal in 
 merit to the volumes which he has already published ... It would be difficult to speak too highly 
 of the notes. There could be no better way of gaining an insight into the characteristics of 
 Cicero's style and the Latinity of his period than by making a careful study of this speech with 
 the aid of Mr Reid's commentary . . . Mr Reid's intimate knowledge of the minutest details of 
 scholarship enables him to detect and explain the shghtest points of distinction between the 
 usages of different authors and diflerent periods . . . The notes are followed by a valuable 
 appendix on the text, and another on points of orthography ; an excellent index brings the work 
 to a close." — Saturday Review. 
 
 CICERO. SOMNIUM SCIPIONIS. With Introduction 
 
 and Notes. By W. D. Pearman, M.A., Head Master of Potsdam School, 
 Jamaica, ^s. 
 
 HORACE. EPISTLES, Book I. With Notes and Intro- 
 duction by E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A. 2^. 6^. 
 
 LIVY. Book IV. With Notes and Introduction, by 
 Rev. H. M. Stephenson, M.A. is. 6d. 
 
 LIVY. Book V. With Notes and Introduction by L. 
 
 Whibley, M.A., Fellow of Pembroke College, is. 6d., [Shortly. 
 
 LIVY. Books XXL, XXII. With Notes, Introduction and 
 
 Maps. By M. S. Dimsdale, M.A., Fellow of King's College, is. 6d. each. 
 
 LUCAN. PHARSALIA LIBER PRIMUS. Edited with 
 
 English Introduction and Notes by W. E. Heitland, M.A. and C. E. 
 
 Haskins, M.A., Fellows and Lecturers of St John's College, Cambridge. 
 
 IS. 6d. 
 "A careful and scholarlike production." — Times. 
 
 "In nice parallels of Lucan from Latin poets and from Shakspeare, Mr Haskins and Mr 
 Heitland deserve praise." — Saturday Review. 
 
 LUCRETIUS. Book V. With Notes and Introduction by 
 
 J. D. Duff, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College, is. 
 
 OVID. FASTI. Liber VI. With a Plan of Rome and 
 
 Notes by A. SiDGWiCK, M.A., Tutor of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. 
 
 IS. 6d. 
 " Mr Sidgwick's editing of the Sixth Book of Ovid's /^a^// furnishes a careful and serviceable 
 volume for average students. It eschews 'construes' which supersede the use of the dictionary, 
 but gives full explanation of grammatical usages and historical and mythical allusions, besides 
 illustrating peculiarities of style, true and false derivations, and the more remarkable variations of 
 the text." — Saturday Review. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla v &= Sons^ Cambridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
34 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 QUINTUS CURTIUS. A Portion of the History. 
 
 (Alexander in India.) By W. E. Heitland, M. A., Fellow and Lecturer 
 
 of St John's College, Cambridge, and T. E. Raven, B.A., Assistant Master 
 
 in Sherborne School, 3^. 6d. 
 
 "Equally commendable as a genuine addition to the existing stock of school-books is 
 
 Alexander in India, a compilation from the eighth and ninth books of Q. Curtius, edited for 
 
 the Pitt Press by Messrs Heitland and Raven. . . . The work of Curtius has merits of its 
 
 own, which, in former generations, made it a favourite with English scholars, and which still 
 
 make it a popular text-book in Continental schools The reputation of Mr Heitland is a 
 
 sufficient guarantee for the scholarship of the notes, which are ample without being excessive, 
 and the book is well furnished with all that is needful in the nature of maps, indices, and 
 appendices." —Academy. 
 
 VERGIL. AENEID. Libri L, II., III., IV., V., VI., VII. 
 
 VIII., IX., X., XI., XII. Edited with Notes by A. Sidgwick, M.A., 
 Tutor of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. \s. 6d. each. 
 
 " Mr Sidgwick's Vergil is we believe, the best school edition of the poet." — Guardian. 
 
 " Mr Arthur Sidgwick's 'Vergil, Aeneid, Book XII.' is worthy of his reputation, and is dis- 
 tinguished by the same acuteness and accuracy of knowledge, appreciation of a boy's difficulties 
 and ingenuity and resource in meeting them, which we have on other occasions had reason to 
 praise in these pages." — The Academy. 
 
 "As masterly in its clearly divided preface and appendices as in the sound and independent 
 character of its annotations. . . . There is a great deal more in the notes than mere compilation 
 and suggestion. ... No difficulty is left unnoticed or unhandled." — Saturday Review. 
 
 VERGIL. AENEID. Libri IX. X. in one volume. 3^. 
 VERGIL. AENEID. Libri X., XL, XII. in one volume. 
 
 3^-. 6d. 
 
 VERGIL. BUCOLICS. With Introduction and Notes, by 
 
 the same Editor, is. 6d. 
 
 VERGIL. GEORGICS. Libri I. II. By the same 
 
 Editor. 2s. Libri III. IV. is. 
 
 " This volume, which completes the Pitt Press edition of Virgil's Georgics, is distinguished by 
 the same admirable judgment and first-rate scholarship as are conspicuous in the former volume 
 and in the "Aeneid" by the same talented editor." — Athenceum. 
 
 VERGIL. The Complete Works, edited .with Notes, by 
 
 A. Sidgwick, M.A., Two vols. Vol. I. containing the Text and Intro- 
 duction, y. 6d. Vol. II. The Notes, ^s. 6d. 
 
 II. FRENCH. 
 
 CORNEILLE. LA SUITE DU MENTEUR. A Comedy 
 
 in Five Acts. Edited with Fontenelle's Memoir of the Author, Voltaire's 
 Critical Remarks, and Notes Philological and Historical. By the late 
 
 GUSTAVE MaSSON. 2S. 
 
 DE BONNECHOSE. LAZARE HOCHE. With Four 
 
 Maps, Introduction and Commentary, by C. Colbeck, M.A., late Fellow of 
 Trinity College, Cambridge. Revised Edition. 2^. 
 
 D'HARLEVILLE. LE VIEUX CELIBATAIRE. A 
 
 Comedy. With a Biographical Memoir, and Grammatical, Literary and 
 Historical Notes. By Gustave Masson. is. 
 
 Londoft : C. J. Cla v £r» Sons, Cafndrid^e University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 35 
 
 DE LAMARTINE. JEANNE D'ARC. With a Map 
 
 and Notes Historical and Philological and a Vocabulary by Rev. A. C. 
 Clapin, M.A., St John's College, Cambridge, and Bachelier-es-Lettres of 
 the University of France. Enlarged Edition, ^s. 
 
 DE VIGNY. LA CANNE DE JONC. Edited with Notes 
 
 by Rev. H. A. Bull, M.A. 2j. 
 
 ERCKMANN-CHATRIAN. LA GUERRE. With Map, 
 
 Introduction and Commentary by the Rev. A. C. Clapin, M.A. ■i^s. 
 
 LA BARONNE DE STAEL-HOLSTEIN. LE DIREC- 
 
 TOIRE. (Considerations sur la Revolution Fran9aise. Troisieme et 
 
 quatrieme parties.) With a Critical Notice of the Author, a Chronological 
 
 Table, and Notes Historical and Philological, by G. Masson, B.A., and 
 
 G. W. Prothero, M.A. Revised and enlarged Edition, is, 
 
 " Prussia under Frederick the Great, and France under the Directory, bring us face to face 
 
 respectively with periods of history which it is right should be known thoroughly, and which 
 
 are well treated in the Pitt Press volumes. The latter in particular, an extract from the 
 
 world-known work of Madame de Stael on the French Revolution, is beyond all praise for 
 
 the excellence both of its style and of its vazXXsx."— Times. 
 
 LA BARONNE DE STAEL-HOLSTEIN. DIX AN- 
 
 NEES D'EXIL. Livre II. Chapitres 1—8. With a Biographical 
 Sketch of the Author, a Selection of Poetical Fragments by Madame de 
 Stael's Contemporaries, and Notes Historical and Philological. By Gustave 
 Masson and G. W. Prothero, M.A. Revised and enlarged edition, is. 
 
 LEMERCIER. FREDEGONDE. ET BRUNEHAUT. A 
 
 Tragedy in Five Acts. Edited with Notes, Genealogical and Chronological 
 Tables, a Critical Introduction and a Biographical Notice. By Gustave 
 Masson. is. 
 
 MOLIERE. LE BOURGEOIS GENTILHOMME, Come- 
 
 die-Ballet en Cinq Actes. (1670.) With a life of Moliere and Grammatical 
 and Philological Notes. By Rev. A. C. Clapin. Revised Edition. \s. 6d. 
 
 MOLIERE. L'ECOLE DES FEMMES. Edited with In- 
 troduction and Notes by George Saintsbury, M.A. 2s. 6d. 
 
 "Mr Saintsbury's clear and scholarly notes are rich in illustration of the valuable kind that 
 vivifies textual comment and criticism." — Saturday Review. 
 
 MOLIERE. LES PRECIEUSES RIDICULES. With 
 
 Introduction and Notes by E. G. W. Braunholtz, M. A., Ph.D. University 
 Lecturer in French, is. 
 
 PI RON. LA METROMANIE, A Comedy, with a Bio- 
 graphical Memoir, and Grammatical, Literary and Historical Notes. By 
 G. Masson. is. 
 
 RACINE. LES PLAIDEURS. With Introduction and 
 
 Notes by E. G. W. Braunholtz, M.A., Ph.D. is. 
 
 S AINTE-BEUVE. M. DARU (Causeries du Lundi, Vol. IX.). 
 
 With Biographical Sketch of the Author, and Notes Philological and Histo- 
 rical. By Gustave Masson. 2^. 
 SAINTINE. LA PICCIOLA. The Text, with Introduc- 
 tion, Notes and Map, by Rev. A. C. Clapin. is. 
 
 London : C J. Cla y 6r» Sons^ Ca7nbridge University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
36 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 SCRIBE AND LEGOUVE. BATAILLE DE DAMES. 
 
 Edited by Rev. H. A. Bull, M.A. ^s. 
 
 SCRIBE. LE VERRE D'EAU. With a Biographical 
 
 Memoir, and Grammatical, Literary and Historical Notes. By C. Colbeck, 
 M.A. 2J. 
 
 " It may be national prejudice, but we consider this edition far superior to any of the series 
 which hitherto have been edited exclusively by foreigners. Mr Colbeck seems better to under- 
 stand the wants and difficulties of an English boy. The etymological notes especially are admi- 
 rable. . . . The historical notes and introduction are a piece of thorough honest work." — Journal 
 of Education. 
 
 SEDAINE. LE PHILOSOPHE SANS LE SAVOIR. 
 
 Edited with Notes by Rev. H. A. Bull, M.A., late Master at Wellington 
 College. 2J. 
 
 THIERRY. LETTRES SUR L'HISTOIRE DE FRANCE 
 
 (XIII.— XXIV.). By GusTAVE Masson, B.A. and G. W. Prothero, M.A. 
 With Map. IS. 6d. 
 
 THIERRY. RECITS DES TEMPS MEROVINGIENS 
 
 I — III. Edited by Gustave Masson, B.A. Univ. Gallic, and A. R. Ropes, 
 M.A. With Map. 3^. 
 
 VILLEMAIN. LASCARIS, ou LES GRECS DU XV^ 
 
 SIilCLE, Nouvelle Historique, with a Biographical Sketch of the Author, 
 a Selection of Poems on Greece, and Notes Historical and Philological. 
 By Gustave Masson, B.A. is. 
 
 VOLTAIRE. HISTOIRE DU SIECLE DE LOUIS XIV. 
 
 Part I. Chaps. I.— XIII. Edited with Notes Philological and Historical, 
 Biographical and Geographical Indices, etc. by G. Masson, B.A. Univ. 
 Gallic, and G. W. Prothero, M.A., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. 
 2s. 6d. 
 
 Part II. Chaps. XIV.— XXIV. With Three Maps 
 
 of the Period. By the same Editors. 2s. 6d. 
 
 Part III. Chap. XXV. to the end. By the same 
 
 Editors. 2S. 6d. 
 
 XAVIER DE MAISTRE. LA JEUNE SIBERIENNE. 
 
 LE LEPREUX DE LA CITJ& D'AOSTE. With Biographical Notice, 
 Critical Appreciations, and Notes. By G. Masson, B.A. is. 6d. 
 
 IV. GERMAN. 
 
 BALLADS ON GERMAN HISTORY. Arranged and 
 
 Annotated by W. Wagner, Ph. D., late Professor at the Johanneum, 
 Hamburg, is. 
 
 "It carries the reader rapidly through some of the most important incidents connected with 
 the German race and name, from the invasion of Italy by the Visigoths under their King Alaric, 
 down to the Franco-German War and the installation of the present Emperor. The notes supply 
 very well the connecting links between the successive periods, and exhibit in its various phases of 
 growth and progress, or the reverse, the vast unwieldy mass which constitutes modern Germany." 
 — Times. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 37 
 
 BENEDIX. DOCTOR WESPE. Lustspiel in funf Auf- 
 
 ziigen. Edited with Notes by Karl Hermann Breul, M.A. 35. 
 
 FREYTAG. DER STAAT FRIEDRICHS DES GROS- 
 
 SEN. With Notes. By Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D. 2s. 
 
 GERMAN DACTYLIC POETRY. Arranged and Anno- 
 
 tated by the same Editor, y. 
 
 ®oat)c'^ 5?nabenja^re. (1749— 1759.) GOETHE'S BOY- 
 HOOD : being the First Three Books of his Autobiography. Arranged 
 and Annotated by the same Editor, is. 
 
 GOETHE'S HERMANN AND DOROTHEA. With 
 
 an Introduction and Notes. By the same Editor. Revised edition by J. W. 
 Cartmell, M.A. ^s.6d. 
 
 "The notes are among the best that we know, with the reservation that they are often too 
 abundant." — Academy. 
 
 GUTZKOW. ZOPF UND SCHWERT. Lustspiel in 
 
 fiinf Aufziigen von. With a Biographical and Historical Introduction, English 
 Notes, and an Index. By H. J. Wolstenholme, B.A.'(Lond.). 3^. 6d. 
 
 "We are glad to be able to notice a careful edition of K. Gutzkow's amusing comedy 
 *Zopf and Schwert' by Mr H. J. Wolstenholme. . . . These notes are abundant and contain 
 references to standard grammatical works." — Academy. 
 
 HAUFF. DAS BILD DES KAISERS. Edited by Karl 
 
 Hermann Breul, M.A., Ph.D. ^s. 
 
 HAUFF. DAS WIRTHSHAUS IM SPESSART. Edited 
 
 by A. ScHLOTTMANN, Ph. D., late Assistant Master at Uppingham School. 
 IS. 6d. 
 
 HAUFF. DIE KARA VANE. Edited with Notes by A. 
 
 SCHLOTTMANN, Ph. D. 3^-. 6d. 
 
 IMMERMANN. DER OBERHOF. A Tale of West- 
 
 phalian Life. With a Life of Immermann and English Notes, by Wilhelm 
 Wagner, Ph.D., late Professor at the Johanneum, Hamburg. 3^-. 
 
 KOHLRAUSCH. Da6 3a^r 1813 (The Year 1813). With 
 
 English Notes. By W. Wagner. 2s. 
 
 LESSING AND GELLERT. SELECTED FABLES. 
 
 Edited with Notes by Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., Lecturer in German 
 at the University of Cambridge. 3^. 
 
 MENDELSSOHN'S LETTERS. Selections from. Edited 
 
 by James SiME, M.A. y. 
 
 RAUMER. Der erfte ^xtmn (THE FIRST CRUSADE). 
 
 Condensed from the Author's 'History of the Hohenstaufen', with a life of 
 Raumer, two Plans and English Notes. By W. Wagner, is. 
 
 " Certainly no more interesting book could be made the subject of examinations. The story 
 of the First Crusade has an undying interest. The notes are, on the whole, good." — Educational 
 Titnes. 
 
 RIEHL. CULTURGESCHICHTLICHE NOVELLEN. 
 
 With Grammatical, Philological, and Historical Notes, and a Complete 
 Index, by H. J. Wolstenholme, B.A. (Lond.). y. 6d. 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y &^ Sons, Cainbridge University Press Warehouse, 
 
 Ave Maria Lane, 
 
38 PUBLICATIONS OF 
 
 SCHILLER WILHELM TELL. Edited with Intro- 
 duction and Notes by Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., University Lecturer 
 in German, 2S. 6d. 
 
 UHLAND. ERNST, HERZOG VON SCHWABEN. With 
 
 Introduction and Notes. By H. J. Wolsten holme, B.A. (Lond.), 
 Lecturer in German at Newnhanni College, Cambridge, y. 6d. 
 
 V. ENGLISH. 
 
 ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY. A SKETCH OF, FROM 
 
 THALES TO CICERO, by Joseph B. Mayor, M. A. 3^. 6d. 
 
 "Professor Mayor contributes to the Pitt Press Series A Sketch of Ancient Philosophy in 
 which he has endeavoured to give a general view of the philosophical systems illustrated by the 
 genius of the masters of metaphysical and ethical science from Thales to Cicero. In the course 
 of his sketch he takes occasion to give concise analyses of Plato's Republic, and of the Ethics and 
 Politics of Aristotle ; and these abstracts will be to some readers not the least useful portions of 
 the book." — The Guardian. 
 
 ARISTOTLE. OUTLINES OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF. 
 
 Compiled by Edwin Wallace, M.A., LL.D. (St Andrews), late Fellow 
 of Worcester College, Oxford. Third Edition Enlarged. 4^-. dd. 
 "A judicious selection of characteristic passages, arranged in paragraphs, each of which is 
 preceded by a masterly and perspicuous English analysis." — Scotsman. 
 
 "Gives in a comparatively small compass a very good sketch of Aristotle's teaching." — Sat. 
 Review. 
 
 BACON'S HISTORY OF THE REIGN OF KING 
 
 HENRY VII. With Notes by the Rev. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. 3^. 
 
 COWLEY'S ESSAYS. With Introduction and Notes. By 
 
 the Rev. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D., Norrisian Professor of Divinity; Fellow 
 of St Catharine's College. 4J. 
 
 MORE'S HISTORY OF KING RICHARD III. Edited 
 
 with Notes, Glossary and Ijidex of Names. By J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. 
 to which is added the conclusion of the History of King Richard IH. as given 
 in the continuation of Hardyng's Chronicle, London, 1543. 3^^. 6d. 
 
 MORE'S UTOPIA. With Notes by the Rev. J. Rawson 
 
 Lumby, D.D. 3^-. 6d. 
 
 " It was originally written in Latin and does not find a place on ordinary bookshelves. A very 
 great boon has therefore been conferred on the general English reader by the managers of the 
 Pitt Press Series, in the issue of a convenient little volume of More's Utopia not in the original 
 Latin, but in the quaint English Translation thereof made by Raphe Robynson, which adds a 
 linguistic interest to the intrinsic merit of the work. . . . All this has been edited in a most com- 
 plete and scholarly fashion by Dr J. R. Lumby, the Norrisian Professor of Divinity, whose name 
 alone is a sufficient warrant for its accuracy. It is a real addition to the modern stock of classical 
 English literature. " — Guardian. 
 
 THE TWO NOBLE KINSMEN, edited with Intro- 
 
 duction and Notes by the Rev. Professor Skeat, Litt.D., formerly Fellow 
 
 of Christ's College, Cambridge, is. 6d. 
 "This edition of a play that is well worth study, for more reasons than one, by so careful a 
 scholar as Mr Skeat, deserves a hearty welcome." — Athenceum. 
 
 "Mr Skeat is a conscientious editor, and has left no difficulty unexplained." — Times. 
 
 VI. EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE. 
 
 COMENIUS. JOHN AMOS, Bishop of the Moravians. His 
 
 Life and Educational Works, by S. S. Laurie, M.A., F.R.S.E., Professor of 
 the Institutes and History of Education in the University of Edinburgh. 
 New Edition, revised. 3^. 6d, 
 
 London : C. J. Cla y 6^ Sons^ Cambridge Universiiy Press Waj-ehoi/se, 
 Ave Maria Lane. 
 
THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 39 
 
 EDUCATION. THREE LECTURES ON THE PRAC- 
 TICE OF. I. On Marking, by H. W. Eve, M.A. II. On Stimulus, by 
 A. SiDGWiCK, M.A. III. On the Teaching of Latin Verse Composition, by 
 E. A. Abbott, D.D. is. 
 
 LOCKE ON EDUCATION. With Introduction and Notes 
 
 by the Rev. R. H. Quick, M.A. y. 6d. 
 
 " The work before us leaves nothing to be desired. It is of convenient form and reasonable 
 price, accurately printed, and accompanied by notes which are admirable. There is no teacher 
 too young to find this book interesting ; there is no teacher too old to find it profitable."— 7"A^ 
 School Bulletin, New York. 
 
 MILTON'S TRACTATE ON EDUCATION. A fac- 
 
 simile reprint from the Edition of 1673. Edited, with Introduction and 
 Notes, by Oscar Browning, M.A. 2s. 
 
 "A separate reprint of Milton's famous letter to Master Samuel Hartlib was a desideratum, 
 and we are grateful to Mr Browning for his elegant and scholarly edition, to which is prefixed the 
 careful resume of the work given in his ' History of Educational Theories ' "—Journal of 
 Education. 
 
 MODERN LANGUAGES. LECTURES ON THE 
 
 TEACHING OF, delivered in the University of Cambridge in the Lent 
 Term, 1887. By C Colbeck, M.A., Assistant Master of Harrow School, is. 
 
 ON STIMULUS. A Lecture delivered for the Teachers' 
 
 Training Syndicate at Cambridge, May 1882, by A SiDGWiCK, M.A. i.r. 
 
 TEACHER. GENERAL AIMS OF THE, AND FORM 
 
 MANAGEMENT. Two Lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge 
 in the Lent Term, 1883, by Archdeacon Farrar, D.D., and R. B. Poole, 
 B.D. Head Master of Bedford Modern School. \s. 6d. 
 
 TEACHING. THEORY AND PRACTICE OF. By the 
 
 Rev. Edward Thring, M.A., late Head Master of Uppingham School 
 and Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. New Edition. 4^. 6d. 
 "Any attempt to summarize the contents of the volume would fail to give our readers a 
 taste of the pleasure that its perusal has given \xs."— Journal of Education. 
 
 BRITISH INDIA, A SHORT HISTORY OF. By 
 
 Rev. E. S. Carlos, M. A., late Head Master of Exeter Grammar School. \s. 
 
 GEOGRAPHY, ELEMENTARY COMMERCIAL. A 
 
 Sketch of the Commodities and the Countries of the World. By H. R. 
 Mill, Sc.D., F.R.S.E., Lecturer on Commercial Geography in the Heriot- 
 Watt College, Edinburgh, is. 
 
 AN ATLAS OF COMMERCIAL GEOGRAPHY. In- 
 tended as a Companion to the above. By J. G. Bartholomew, 
 F.R.G.S. With an Introduction by Dr H. R. Mill. 3^. 
 
 VII. MATHEMATICS. 
 
 EUCLID'S ELEMENTS OF GEOMETRY. Books I. 
 
 & II. Edited by H. M. Taylor, M.A., Fellow and formerly Tutor of 
 Trinity College, Cambridge, is. 6d. 
 
 Books III. and IV. By the same Editor. 
 
 [In the Press. 
 
 [Other Volumes are in preparation^ 
 
 l.ondo7i : C. J. Cla v &r SONS, Cambridi^e University Press Warehouse^ 
 Ave Maria Lajte. 
 
fflnifaersfftp of aDambrOrge. 
 
 — -♦ — 
 
 LOCAL EXAMINATIONS. 
 
 Examination Papers, for various years, with the Regulations for the 
 Examination. Demy 8vo. 2s. each, or by Post 2s. 2d. 
 
 Class Lists, for various years, Boys \s., Girls dd. 
 Annual Reports of the Syndicate, with Supplementary Tables showing 
 the success and failure of the Candidates, is. each, by Post is. 3^. 
 
 HIGHER LOCAL EXAMINATIONS. 
 
 Examination Papers for various years, to which a7'e added the Regu- 
 lations/or the Examination. Demy 8vo. 2s. each, by Post is. id. 
 Class Lists, for various years, is. each. By Post ij-. id. 
 Reports of the Syndicate. Demy 8vo. u., by Post \s. id. 
 
 LOCAL LECTURES SYNDICATE. 
 
 Calendar for the years 1875—80. Fcap. 8vo. cloth. is.\ for 1880—81. \s. 
 
 TEACHERS' TRAINING SYNDICATE. 
 
 Examination Papers for various years, to which are added the Regu- 
 lations for the Examination. Demy 8vo. 6^., by Post ']d. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY REPORTER. 
 
 Published by Authority. 
 Containing all the Official Notices of the University, Reports of 
 Discussions in the Schools, and Proceedings of the Cambridge 
 Philosophical, Antiquarian and Philological Societies, ^d. weekly. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION PAPERS. 
 
 These Papers are published in occasional numbers every Term, and in 
 
 volumes for the Academical year. 
 
 Vol. XVI. Parts 44 to 65. Papers for the Year 1886—87, iS-J"- cloth. 
 
 Vol. XVII. „ 65 to 86. „ „ 1887— 88, 15^-. ^/^/^ 
 
 Vol. XVIII. „ 87 to 107. „ „ 1888—89, 15^. cloth. 
 
 Oxford and Cambridge Schools Examinations. 
 
 Papers set in the Examination for Certificates, July, 1888. is. 6d. 
 
 List of Candidates who obtained Certificates at the Examination 
 
 held in 1889 ; and Supplementary Tables. 6d. 
 Regulations of the Board for 1890. 9^. 
 Regulations for the Commercial Certificate, 1890. 3d. 
 Report of the Board for the year ending Oct. 31, 1889. is. 
 
 Studies from the Morphological Laboratory in the Uni- 
 versity of Cambridge. Edited by Adam Sedgwick, M.A., Fellow and 
 Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge. Vol. II. Part I. Royal 8vo. los. 
 Vol.11. Part II. ^s.ed. Vol. III. Parti, ^s-ed. Vol. III. Part II. ^s.6d. 
 Vol. IV. Part I. \2s. 6d. Vol. IV. Part II. los. Vol. IV. Part III. e^s. 
 
 Uontion : c. j. clay and sons, 
 
 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, 
 
 AVE MARIA LANE. 
 
 GLASGOW : ^263, ARGYLE STREET. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE: PRINTK.n RY C, J. CI.AV, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 
 
THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW 
 
 jj^^B 14 DAY USE ■■■ 
 
 RETURN CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT 
 TObh^ 202 Main Library 
 
 LOAN PERIOD 1 
 HOME USE 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS 
 
 1 -month loans may be renewed by calling 642-3405 
 
 6-month loans may be recharged by bringing books to Circulation Desk 
 
 Renewals and recharges may be made 4 days prior to due dote 
 
 DUE AS STAMPED BELOW 
 
 
 
 
 DEC 71978 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 SENT ON ILL 
 
 
 \ 
 
 MAY 1 3 1M7 
 
 
 
 U C BERKELE 
 
 f 
 
 
 \o(z^l%% 
 
 
 
 y 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 FORM NO. DD 6, 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF 
 BERKEI 
 
 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 
 .EY, CA 94720 
 
U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES 
 
 CDDfl7E777S