LIBRARY CALIFORNIA AN MM* A The Art of Creation Essays on the Self and Its Powers ^ "By Edward Carpenter Author of " Towards Democracy," " Civilisation," etc. etc. London : George Allen, Ruskin House 156, Charing Cross Road Mdcccciv All rights reserved * Printed by BALLANTVNE, HANSON &> Co. At the Ballantyne Press " These two things, the spiritual and the material, though we call them by different names, in their Origin are one and the same." LAO-TZU. " When a new desire has declared itself in the human heart, when a new plexus is forming among the nerves, then the revolutions of nations are already decided, and histories unwritten are written" TOWARDS DEMOCRACY. PREFACE WE seem to be arriving at a time when, with the circling of our knowledge of the globe, a great synthesis of all human thought on the ancient and ever-engrossing problem of Creation is quite naturally and inevitably taking shape. The world-old wisdom of the Upanishads, with their profound and impregnable doctrine of the universal Self, the teachings of Buddha or of Lao-tzu, the poetic insight of Plato, the inspired sayings of Jesus and Paul, the speculations of Plotinus, or of the Gnostics, and the wonderful contributions of later European thought, from the fourteenth century mystics down through Spinoza, Berkeley, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Ferrier and others ; all these, combining with the immense mass of material furnished by modern physical and biological Science, and Psychology, are preparing a great birth, as it were ; and out of Preface this meeting of elements is already arising the dim outline of a philosophy which must surely dominate human thought for a long period. A new philosophy we can hardly expect, or wish for ; since indeed the same germinal thoughts of the Vedic authors come all the way down history even to Schopenhauer and Whitman, inspiring philosophy after philosophy and religion after religion. But it is only to-day that our knowledge of the world enables us to recognise this immense consensus ; and it is only to-day that Science, with its huge conquests in the material plane, is able to provide for these world-old principles somewhat of a new form, and so wonderful a garment 'of illustration and expres- sion as it does. The philosophy of the Upanishads was nothing if not practical ; and the same has been said by every great religion of its own teaching. (" Do the will and ye shall know of the doctrine.") It is not sufficient to study and investigate the art of Creation as an external problem ; we have to learn and to practise the art in ourselves. So alone will it become vital and really intelligible to us. The object of the present volume is to show Preface something of both these sides, the speculative and the practical. Chapter II., from which the book takes its name, was originally given as an address. The remainder of the body of the book appears now for the first time with the exception of Chapters VIII. and IX., on "The Gods." These in an altered form were published as an article in the Hibbert Journal for Jan. 1904, and for leave to reprint them I am much indebted to the Editor of that Journal. In the Appendix I have in- cluded three articles of a considerably earlier date, as possibly in their way contributing some light to the main questio- s of the book. E. C. IX CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE ....... vii I. PRELIMINARY ....... i II. THE ART OF CREATION . . . . .10 III. MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS . . . . 35 IV. THE THREE STAGES OF CONSCIOUSNESS . . 46 V. THE SELF AND ITS AFFILIATIONS ... 63 VI. THE SELF AND ITS AFFILIATIONS (continued) . 84 VII. PLATONIC IDEAS AND HEREDITY . . .106 VIII. THE GODS AS APPARITIONS OF THE RACE-LIFE 123 IX. THE GODS AS DWELLING IN THE PHYSIOLOGICAL CENTRES . . . . . . .142 X. THE DEVILS AND THE IDOLS . . . .162 XL BEAUTY AND DUTY . . . . .180 XII. CREATION ....... 196 XIII. TRANSFORMATION . . . . . .211 APPENDIX 1. THE MAY-FLY : A STUDY IN TRANSFORMATION 225 2. HEALTH A CONQUEST . . . . .243 3. EVENING IN SPRING : A MEDITATION . .251 THE ART OF CREATION PRELIMINARY RELATED Motion seems to be, as suggested by the words Attraction and Repulsion, Gravitation, Chemical Affinity, and so forth, the ground-fact of inorganic Nature. And it seems also to be the ground and foundation of Life. The proto- plasmic jelly moves towards or away from sub- stances in its neighborhood, and this appears to be its fundamental property. The most primitive cellular organisms act in the same way. Some seek light, others flee from it. Paramecium is drawn towards slightly acid substances, and flies from alkalies. Actynophrys is attracted by starch ; and so on. 1 There appears to be a kind of ' choice ' or elective affinity ; and the learned are divided on the subject into two schools those who, like Binet, see in these movements of pro- tozoa the germinal characteristics of human intel- ligence, and those who class them as " merely chemical " and automatic reactions. 1 See Th. Ribot, " Psychology of the Emotions," Contem- porary Science Series, p. 4. Also H. S. Jennings, " Psychology of a Protozoan,'' American Journal of Psychology, vol. x. I A The Art of Creation It is not our business here to draw the line of division. It is sufficient to see thataon the very lowest rung of the ladder of life, and at a point where it is difficult to distinguish its laws from those of chemistry, such words as we are forced to use words like Attraction, Repulsion, Affinity have a double meaning, covering both material and mental, external and internal, affections. Even the word Motion itself passes easily into E-motion. And modern psychology and physi- ology have made it abundantly clear that every feeling or emotion in the mind means motion of some kind in the tissues or fluids of the body. Some of our highest and most complex emotions take the form of attraction or repulsion, and in our dimmest sensations, almost below the level of consciousness, we still can detect the same. All Nature is motion. In the most primitive Life there is a tendency to motion provoked by a neighboring object. This capacity to be pro- voked into motion is called irritability, and in a higher degree sensibility. All these words ' tendency,' * irritability,' ' sensibility ' have a mental as well as physical import, which it is difficult to escape from. If a protozoic cell does not feel ' desire ' for food such as we feel, it exhibits a ' tendency ' towards it, which we can hardly refuse to regard as the germ of ' desire.' Over the question of the priority of the mental or the material aspects of cells and other things there has been much discussion some maintain- ing that chemical and automatic reactions come 2 Preliminary first, and that later, out of these, mental pheno- mena are evolved ; while others insist that con- sciousness in some form is prior, and the material world only its expression. I think it best and simplest to suppose the two simultaneous and coextensive and I shall (provisionally) assume this position, leaving the question to clear itself up later in the book. 1 I may, however, here quote two passages from Lloyd-Morgan's " Intro- duction to Comparative Psychology." Speaking of consciousness in some form as accompanying all vital organisation, he says: "Does it not seem reasonable to suppose that no matter what stage we select, analysis would still disclose the two aspects ? That with the simpler modes of nerve-energy there would go simpler modes of consciousness, and that with infra-neural modes of energy there would be infra-consciousness, or that from which Consciousness as we know it has arisen in process- of Evolution ? " And again, speaking of a dog as having grown from a single fertilised egg-cell : " From what then have its states of consciousness been evolved ? Do we not seem forced by parity of reasoning to answer : From something more simple than consciousness, but of the same order of existence, which answers subjectively to the simpler organic energy of the fertilised ovum" that is, he supposes that asso- ciated with the egg- cell is a subconsciousness of some kind, which expands into the fuller 1 See chapters iii. and iv. 2 Contemporary Science Series, pp. 8 and 328. 3 The Art of Creation consciousness part passu with the evolution of the egg-cell into the dog. Let us assume for the present that Mind and Matter are simultaneous and coextensive. Then on the latter side we have in ascending scale, first, purely inorganic substances (if there are such), then crystals, protoplasmic cells, vegetation, the animal world, man, and whatever beings are superior to man ; while on the mental side cor- responding we have simple attraction and re- pulsion, selective affinity, irritability, sensibility, simple consciousness, self-consciousness, and such higher stages of consciousness as are beyond. Taking this view, we are enabled to abandon the somewhat futile attempts which have been made in all ages to separate Mind and Matter, and to glorify one over the other (sometimes mind over matter, and sometimes matter over mind). These attempts have led mankind into all sorts of bogs, which we may hope now simply to pass by and leave behind. There is a distinction be- tween Mind and Matter (as of two aspects of the same thing), but no real separation. This subject is dealt with at more length in the chapter on Matter and Consciousness (chap, iii.). We may say here, however, that the distinction between Mind and Matter forces us to conceive, or try to conceive, of a ' stuff' prior to both a something of which they are the two aspects ; and thus we come to the world- old idea of primitive Being (before all differentia- tion, emanation, or expression), or the ' Will ' of 4 Preliminary the later philosophers (Schopenhauer, Hartmann, Royce, and others). This Will or Being is abso- lutely not thinkable by the ordinary consciousness (except as a necessary ground for other thoughts), for obviously it lies beyond the region of thought. I shall, however, endeavour to show that it is known in the stage of (cosmic) consciousness transcending our ordinary consciousness. The perception of matter and mind as distinct things belongs only to our ordinary (self) consciousness. This distinction is not known in the earlier stage of simple consciousness, and it passes away again in the higher and more perfect stage of the cosmic consciousness. (See chap. iv. on " The Three Stages of Consciousness.") Nevertheless, though Matter and Mind are not separable, and may be regarded as two aspects of one reality, there are advantages in cases in treating one as prior to the other. As a rule, since our mental states are the things that are nearest to us and that we know best, it seems wisest to begin from the mental side. Then if we explain material things in terms of mind, we explain things little known in terms of things better known ; whereas if we explain mental things in terms of matter, we are elucidating things inadequately known by means of things less known. Nevertheless the superior definite - ness of the material world over the mental is a great advantage in favour of the former. There are many things which can be clearly seen from the objective side, which would escape us from 5 The Art of Creation the subjective ; and a healthy Materialism (side by side with the other view) has its proper and important use, and is by no means to be neglected. In addition to the debate as to which is prior, Mind or Matter, there is the further controversy as to which, in the constitution of the Mind itself, comes first and is most fundamental - Feeling or Intellect. This question, however, is not quite on all fours with the other. For the question of Mind and Matter is mainly a meta- physical one, as of two possible aspects of Being ; whereas the other is rather a question\of observation, and of the order of evolution^. I think it will become clear to any one who thinks carefully about the question, that notwithstand- ing a vast amount of interaction between the two, Feeling is more fundamental than Intellect, and prior to it in the order of expression and evolution. Vague desire arises in the mind before ever it takes any form sufficiently definite to be characterised as Thought. This subject, however, I deal with in chap. ii. (" The Art of Creation") more in detail, and I will not dwell upon it here. What we have just said about the necessity of positing a state of ' Being ' prior to Mind (as we use that term) and Matter, indicates to us and it is necessary to dwell upon this for a moment that the problem of the Universe is essentially insoluble to our ordinary thought. It is necessary to face Lhis fact fairly and squarely, 6 Preliminary because by blinking it and deceiving ourselves we get landed in hopeless morasses and vain quests. The problem of the Universe is essentially in- soluble without the introduction of some trans- cendent factor Will, Being, the Ego, a Fourth dimension, or whatever we may term it. The ordinary consciousness, forced to see everything under the double form of subject and object, mind and matter, cannot escape this dual com- pulsion ; and yet at the same time its own con- stitution compels it to realise and to assume that there is another order of being (unrepresentable in thought) in which the duality is merged in unity. It is thus, as it were by its own action, driven against a wall which it cannot overpass, and forced to set a barrier to its own further progress ! Immensely valuable as is the work which physical Science has done, it suffers from this disability which must be fairly faced, namely, that it never can by any possibility explain the situation, since it moves always on one side of a fixed wall or fence. To pass the fence trans- cendental things have to be assumed, and that means that at a certain point the ordinary mind must throw up the sponge ! The situation would be desperate, were it not that perfectly naturally and inevitably in its due time another order of consciousness opens out, which reconciles subject and object, mind and matter, and having one leg firmly planted on the other side, lifts us gently over the stile ! 7 The Art of Creation In the two chapters on " The Self and its Affili- ations," I have assumed that the Ego, a trans- cendental being, descends into and manifests itself in our ordinary world of Time and Space ; and that even as the ego of the tiniest cell it has a potential existence far transcending the minute speck of protoplasm which we can actually see or analyse. This may be thought to be an enormous and unwarrantable assumption, but I have given the reason why assumptions of some such kind are unavoidable. And it may be pointed out that if, endeavoring to keep to the lines of pure physical science, we barred out such assumptions, we should only be landed in an infinity and an unthinkability of another kind. For to understand and define a single tiniest cell, it is a mere truism of science to say, we should have to understand and define all its environ- ment in space and time, or in other words the whole universe. If therefore we find the subject becomes more thinkable by assuming say a fourth dimensional being than by following the ramifica- tions of " matter and force " into infinite space and time, we are quite justified in adopting the former method. For while we have to admit on the one hand that these problems cannot be fully worked out by ordinary thought, we are bound on the other hand (and we necessarily desire) to make their solutions as thinkable as possible. Thinkable in some degree our views of the world must be (even if not absolutely true), or else we cannot use them Preliminary in our ordinary lives ; and however, in course of time, our ordinary modes of thought may be illuminated by a superior order of consciousness, they will still retain their importance and their value in their own sphere. To show the limits of ordinary thought and the points where the various problems hand them- selves over to other stages of consciousness, is part of the object of this series of papers. It is in these stages of consciousness and their succes- sion (which is a practical matter) that the solu- tion of the great world-problems will, I think, be found. And many of the present riddles of existence, which vex us so, will when we compass the ' cosmic ' stage simply be left lying as matters of no importance not to say left ' lying,' as seen to be the delusive things they are. II THE ART OF CREATION 1 IN speaking of "The Art of Creation" as there may be some ambiguity about the expression I wish to say that my object is to consider by what process or method things are made to appear and exist in the world. This may seem a bold matter to discuss ; but it has, of course, been the subject of philosophy time out of mind. Forty or fifty years ago the materialistic view of the world was much in evidence. We all at that time were automatons ; and it was the fashion to regard human beings as composed of enormous crowds of material atoms, by whose mechanical impacts all human actions were pro- duced, and even certain mental phenomena in the shape of consciousness were evolved as a sort of by-product. Since then, however, partly through a natural reaction and partly through the influx of Eastern ideas, there has been a great swing of the pendulum, and a disposition to posit the Mental world as nearer the basis of existence and to look upon material phenomena rather as the outcome and expression of the mental. In the later part of last century we looked upon 1 Given originally as an address. 10 The Art of Creation Creation as a process of Machinery ; to-day we look upon it as an Art. But as no theory or view of things in general is of much value unless founded on actual observa- tion in detail, I should like the reader to consider how things we know about actually do come into existence. And since it is best in such cases to observe things that are near us and that we know most about, I propose that we should first con- sider how our own Thoughts and Actions and Bodily Forms come into existence. Let us take our Thoughts first. We have only to indulge in a few moments' rest, and immedi- ately we become aware that our mind is peopled by a motley crowd of phantoms. We seem to see them springing up of themselves, and almost at random, from the background of consciousness images of scenes, the countenances of friends, concatenations of arguments and of events an innumerable procession. Where does it all come from ? Yet a moment more and we see that the crowd is not a random one, but that it is inspired and given its form by the emotions, the feelings, the desires, lying deep and half-hidden within. We are depressed, and the forms and images that pass before us are those of disaster and fear ; or we are in high spirits and the scenes are scenes of joy and gladness. This is familiar ground, of course, but it may be worth while considering it more in detail. Feeling (or desire) lies beneath. Thought is the form which it takes as it comes into the outer ii The Art of Creation world. 1 Let us take a definite instance. We desire to travel. The desire begins first as a mere vague sense of discomfort or restlessness ; presently it takes shape as a wish to leave home or to visit other regions. It may remain at that for some time ; then it takes somewhat more definite shape as to go to the seaside. Then we consult our wife, we consider ways and means, we fumble through Bradshaw, the thought of Margate comes as a kind of inspiration, and a quite distinct and clearly formed plan emerges. Or we wish to build ourselves a house of our own. For a long time this may only be a kind of cloudy pious aspiration. But at last and almost inevitably, the dream of the house takes shape within our minds. We get so far as to make a pencil sketch of what we want. We go 1 Though there are some who dispute the priority of Feeling, and though undoubtedly there is a great interaction between Feeling and Intellect, so that intellectual states sometimes pro- duce emotional states, and the two are often or even generally intertangled- yet on the whole it is clear, I think, that Feeling is the more fundamental of the two, and prior to I ntellect. Ribot (" Psychology of the Emotions ") mentions various cases in which emotion appears unaccompanied by any intellection as in earliest infancy before perceptions are awakened, or in some cases of disease where vague sadness or dread makes its first appearance without taking any form or having any apparent reason. He thinks there is an "autonomous life of feeling, independent of the intellectual life, and having its cause below" (p. 9). Paul Deussen points out ("Elements of Metaphysics," p. 113) that desire precedes intellect in infancy and survives it in old age ; and Herbert Spencer, in his " Facts and Frag- ments," p. 27, says " the emotions are the masters, the intellect is the servant." We may also notice that in the order of evolution sensation precedes perception, and that a vegetative nervous system appears in the lower animals long before any- thing resembling a brain is developed. The Art of Creation and prospect a site. We consult an architect, and presently there emerges a much more definite and detailed plan than before. Then steps are actually taken towards building. Heaps of bricks and stone and other materials begin to appear on the scene ; and at last there is the house standing, which once only existed in the dream-world of our minds. Always the movement is outwards, from the indefinite vague Feeling or desire to the definite clearly formed Thought, and thence to Action and the External world. Whatever feeling it is, the result is the same. We harbour within us the desire to injure any one, or the desire to benefit any one. The desire cannot remain at that stage. It must either perish away, or else if it is harboured it will grow. It will grow into definite thoughts and plans of benefit or of injury. And these thoughts and plans will grow into Actions. True, the actions may not be seen immediately ; the thoughts and plans may work unseen for a long time. Still, there they are, working ; there they are making ready the channels for action. And this it is, I suppose, which explains the fact that we all of us at times act so much more heroically than either our neighbours, or even ourselves, expect ; and also, I am afraid, that at times we act so much more meanly. All the time, in silence, thought has been busy within, making ready the channels ; and so one day when a great rush of feeling comes it flows down, and in an instant, as it were, before we have time to say 13 The Art of Creation Yea or Nay, has flung itself forth into our actions, and taken form and standing in the visible world. And not only is this true of violent feeling, that it finds expression in the visible world ; but even of very quiet feeling the same, if it is also Persistent. If so small a creature as man presses with his hand against the side of a great ship floating in dock, it seems that no result is pro- duced ; yet we know that if he should continue persistently so to press, in time a measurable effect would ensue. And so it is with those smaller calmer currents of desire and feeling within us. If they are always there, always flowing, they will inevitably show themselves in time. Gradually, insensibly, they modify our thoughts, our actions, our habits of action, the movements of our muscles and limbs, the ex- pressions of our faces, the forms of our bodies. Yes, even the forms of our bodies, the forms and outlines of our faces, our expressions and man- ners, and the tones of our voices all the things that go to make up our appearance in the world are, I will not say entirely the result (since Heredity and other things have to be considered), but plainly to a very great extent the result and expression of those dim feelings and emotions, which, welling up in the hidden caverns of the mind, gradually press forward and outward into the light of day. So far, then, we seem to come upon something which we may call a Law of Nature, just as much 14 The Art of Creation as gravitation or any other law the law, namely, that within ourselves there is a continual move- ment outwards from Feeling towards Thought, and then to Action ; from the inner to the outer ; from the vague to the definite ; from the emotional to the practical ; from the world of dreams to the world of actual things and what we call reality. It will be said, however, that though this general movement of feeling and thought towards the outer and 'real' world may truly be noticed, yet there is an immense and everlasting difference between thoughts and actual things between the sketch of the house in my mind, and the actual house of stone and mortar. The one is a mere dream, an insubstantial phantom inside my brain, which no one but myself can see or feel ; the other is a solid and undeniable fact which would crack my skull and my brain both, if they came into too sudden contact with it. Nevertheless, as I have shown that between a man's thoughts and his actions there is no positive line of sepa- ration that can be drawn ; so I want it to be realised, as we go on, that the house as it exists in the man's brain, and the house as it stands on the hillside, are not two entirely separate things ; that an essential unity enfolds them ; and that the same Art of Creation which is concerned in the production of one is also concerned in the production of the other. But first I would say a word about dreams. I have pointed out that in our waking hours 15 The Art of Creation continual processions of Thoughts are passing through the mind, stimulated by underlying feeling. In the dreams of sleep we notice the same ebullition of images, only we say, and rightly, that they are more scrappy, more in- coherent, more grotesque. The truth is, doubt- less, that in sleep the higher reasoning centres of the brain are quiescent, and consequently the growth of images takes place more at random and less harmoniously. But what I want you to notice is that the same rule as before governs, and that the dream-images are, for the most part, inspired or evoked by dim underlying feelings. We go to sleep with insufficient covering on, and immediately dream of plunging through snow- drifts, or falling into a crevasse ; or we have eaten a heavy supper, and are haunted by most discomfortable apparitions, which image and represent to us in outward form the discomfort we feel within. That hunger or any other need or desire of the body evokes illustrative dreams is a commonplace remark. A friend of mine in the interior of Africa years ago, with an exploring party, was for eight days without food nothing but a parrot and a mud-fish having been obtained during that time ! He said that one of the worst trials of the starvation was the impossibility of sleep which it brought with it. And when, worn out with fatigue, he did relapse into slumber for a minute or two, it was only to be visited by a most tantalising dream. For at once he beheld what he described as "a most delicious dish of 16 The Art of Creation mutton-cutlets " floating towards him. Of course, no sooner did he stretch his hand to seize the prize, than he woke, and the vision departed ; but he said that if during those fateful days he dreamed of that blessed dish once, he dreamed of it a hundred times ! Here we see an almost poetic and artistic effort of the slumbering mind to express the underlying desire for food in the most lovely and attrac- tive form which it could devise. And some folk, who are of a literary turn, are not unaccustomed to find themselves composing dream-verses, which are expressive in their way even if not perfect models of composition. An acquaintance of mine, who was accustomed to keep a pencil and paper by his bedside for such occasions, told me that he once woke in the night feeling himself drenched with a sense of seraphic joy and satisfaction, while at the same time a lovely stanza which he had just dreamed lingered in his mind. Quickly he wrote it down, and immediately fell asleep again. In the morning waking, after a while he bethought himself of the precious experience, and turning to look at the words, which he doubted not would make his name immortal, he read : Walker with one eye, Walker with two, Something to live for, And nothing to do. Here again we find that the deep feeling in which the sleeper's mind was drenched had got so far as to instinctively clothe itself in rhyme 17 B The Art of Creation and rhythm. This at any rate was an important move in the direction of expression, even though the poetry produced was not of a very high order ! Still, one must feel that the ideal of " something to live for, and nothing to do " was a very blessed and beautiful one in its way ! There is a class of dreams which occur not un- frequently under anaesthetics, which are interesting because they illustrate this expressive symbolic quality. There is good reason to believe that under anaesthetics there is a separation effected between the grosser material body and the more subtle and highly conscious part a separation from the connection of pain, and a liberation, so to speak, of the inner being. And it is curious that under anaesthetics dreams so frequently occur in which one seems to be flying or soaring through space with a great sense of joy and liberation. I have heard of many instances. The following rather poetic dream was told me by a friend as consequent on the somewhat prosaic operation of having a tooth removed under gas. He dreamed immediately that he was soaring through space with an intense feeling of freedom and ecstasy. Up and up through the ethereal regions he went till suddenly he popped out on the floor of heaven ! And there (I suppose he had been read- ing Plato) he beheld the twelve gods seated in a semicircle, and filled (as the gods should be) with inextinguishable joy and laughter. And well might they laugh ; for now he became con- scious of himself, there on the floor of heaven, 18 The Art of Creation as a small transparent ball of jelly, in the centre of which was a speck, which he knew to be his very self or ego. He also was greatly amused, and was just about to join in the laughter, when he heard behind him a horrible sound, as of the belling of a gigantic bloodhound ; and a sense of awful despair seized him as he realised that his body, with its mouth wide open, was in pur- suit of him. Escape was hopeless ; there was a moment of agony as he was swallowed down ; and then he woke up to find his tooth out ! In a dream like this, though one cannot suppose it to be an accurate description or vision of what actually took place, yet one may well suppose it to be an artistic representation of real facts and feelings, and an endeavour to portray them in the symbols and images of the world we know. Thus what I want the reader to notice is that the operation of the mind in dreams is along similar lines to that of our waking hours though naturally not quite so perfect that is, it proceeds from underlying feeling to images and thoughts which represent the feeling, and which continually become more distinct and ' real/ [I need hardly say that I am not here giving a complete theory of dreams, for there may be some dreams that fall under other heads ; but I am simply citing them in illustration of my principle.] The tendency is, I say, for all these images evoked in our minds by feeling to grow on us and become more and more distinct and real ; 19 The Art of Creation and indeed in dreams we wonder sometimes at the intense reality of the images we see. But it is really quite the same in waking life. We are walking down the street on some errand ; but presently forgetting about our proper business, the mind wanders away just as in dreamland, and we imagine ourselves talking to some friend in Australia, or at the club arguing violently some question with an opponent. The scene grows more and more distinct, more real to us, we become quite lost in it till suddenly we run against the lamp-post ! then of course the dream is dissipated. Something more real than it has arrived. But in the dreams of sleep there is no lamp-post ; and so they go on gathering reality, till they seem as actual to us as the events of the outer world. The chief difference between the thoughts of our waking hours and those of sleep is that the former are constantly corrected and set in order by the presence of the actual world around us, whereas the visions of sleep grow undisturbed like plants in a hothouse de- fended from the winds, or like weeds in a sheltered and neglected corner of the garden. That this is so, is shown by the fact that our waking thoughts too can gain the same reality as our dreams if they are only encouraged and defended from outer disturbance. When you sit by the fire in the twilight there is little to dis- tract your attention, and your thoughts in such reveries seem strangely real. I have heard of people who indulged in such day-dreams, carrying 20 The Art of Creation them on from day to day, retiring to their rooms always at a certain hour, and taking them up where left the day before, till their life spent in this way seemed as real as their ordinary life. And there are other people, Authors of novels, or Dramatists, who deliberately do this who de- liberately isolate themselves and concentrate their minds till the figures and characters so created become like living men and women. And not only to themselves ; but to the world at large. So that to-day, to every one of us, there are scores of characters created by the great drama- tists and authors, of which it is hard for us at the moment to say whether they are men and women whom we actually remember, or whether they are such creations from books. The truth being that the author with immense labour has projected his own feeling, his own vitality, into figures and forms with such force, that they begin to compete in reality with the figures and forms of the actual world. We may then, I think, fairly conclude from what has been said that the same process may be witnessed both in our waking thoughts and in our dreams namely, a continual ebullition and birth going on within us, and an evolution out of the Mind-stuff of forms which are the expression and images of underlying feeling ; that these forms, at first vague and undetermined in out- line, rapidly gather definition and clearness and materiality, and press forward towards expression in the outer world. And we may fairly ask 21 The Art of Creation whether we are not here within our own minds witnessing what is really the essential process of Creation, taking place everywhere and at all times in other persons as well as ourselves, and in the great Life which underlies and is the visible universe. But it will be said, We can see that the feel- ings in Man clothe themselves in mental images, which he, by throwing his vitality more and more into them, can make practically real to himself; and which by roundabout processes like writing books or setting workmen to build houses he can in time body forth and make real to other folk. But ought he not, if your theory be correct, to be able to throw those mental images direct into the outer world so as to become visible and tangible to others, at once, and without inter- mediate operations ? To which I answer, Dont be in too great a hurry, I believe man has the germ of such power, and will have it in greater degree. But because he can travel so far along the route at present it does not follow that with his yet undeveloped powers he can at once reach the point of being able to project his thoughts in- stantly into the world around him. Yet I would like you in this connection to consider a few facts. In the first place, is it not true that in moments of great feeling there flashes something out of people's faces and figures which Is visible at once to those around, and which is intensely real, quite as real as a light- ning flash, or immovable as a mass of rock ? In 22 The Art of Creation the second place, has not the modern study of telepathy, by careful and scientific methods, shown pretty conclusively that images can be projected by one mind and be seen or felt by others at a distance ? Thirdly, do not the well- established phenomena of Wraiths, or the Ghosts of those in the act of dying, point in the same direction namely, that in such moments the whole vitality of a person may pour itself out towards a loved one and impress itself power- fully as a real presence on the latter's mind. There are other considerations connected with what is called Spiritualism, which are very in- teresting, but which I have not time to dwell on at any length. There seems a mass of evi- dence to show that in connection with so-called mediums in a state of Trance images are evolved which become visible and even tangible to a small circle of people. Now as we have seen that in Reverie, when one's body is at rest and the world around one is still, one's vitality may go into one's thoughts to such a degree as to render them strangely real ; and as in Dreams, when one's body is asleep^ the images become more real still ; so in Trance, which is a still deeper sleep, does it seem quite possible that the inner vitality of the Medium may shape itself into images so far material as to be visible even to other folk. At any rate evidence points in this direction ; and the well-known fact that the Medium is often greatly exhausted after these manifestations, corroborates the idea. For since 23 The Art of Creation an author who spends three or four hours in writing a novel or a play thus doing some of the hardest work to which a mortal can devote himself is all the time throwing out his mental vitality to inspire, embody, and create those images which he gives to the world, and in the process naturally is intensely exhausted ; so by a parity of reasoning we should expect that the medium out of whose mind-stuff such images were directly created would be exhausted in even worse fashion. 1 [I may also remind the reader how tiring it is to any one in ordinary sleep to dream excessively.] However, leaving these passing illustrations, I will now proceed along the main line of argu- ment. Whatever we may think about the last few remarks, we do see within ourselves a very distinct process in operation. There is the first birth of dim vague Feeling or Desire ; then the growth in clearness and intensity of that Feel- ing ; then its shaping into distinct Thoughts or Images ; till these latter become intensely real to ourselves ; then the descent of Thought and Feel- ing into our Nerves and Muscles, our Habits and Manners, the expression of our Faces, the very forms of our Bodies ; and their ultimate trans- lation into Action, and the results of our actions in the Outer World. Of this process there is no doubt. And thus we see that there is in Man a 1 Here again I am not attempting to give a complete theory of Spiritualism, but only to show how some of its phenomena illustrate the main contention of my lecture. 24 The Art of Creation Creative Thought-source continually in opera- tion, which is shaping and giving form not only to his body, but largely to the world in which he lives. In fact, the houses, the gardens, the streets among which we live, the clothes we wear, the books we read, have been produced from this source. And there is not one of these things the building in which we are at this moment, the conveyance in which we may ride home which has not in its first birth been a mere phantom Thought in some man's mind, and owes its existence to that fact. Some of us who live in the midst of what we call Civilisation simply live embedded among the thoughts of other people. We see, hear, and touch those thoughts, and they are, for us, our World. But no sooner do we arrive at this point, and see the position clearly, than another question inevitably rises upon us. If, namely, this world of civilised life, with its great buildings and bridges and wonderful works of art, is the em- bodiment and materialisation of the Thoughts of Man, how about that other world of the mountains and the trees and the mighty ocean and the sunset sky the world of Nature is that also the embodiment and materialisation of the Thoughts of other Beings, or of one other Being ? And when we touch these things are we also coming into touch with the thoughts of these beings ? It may seem rather absurd to some folk to suppose that rocks and stones and trees and 25 The Art of Creation waterspouts can be the expression of any one's thoughts. But that does not prove the thing to be impossible. We know that to primitive savages writing (so familiar to us) appears just such an impossible thing. Some time ago I heard a well-authenticated story of a trader up-country in a distant land, and among a people utterly unused to civilisation, who had each week to send a basket of provisions to another European who lived some miles away. The native who carried the basket was naturally much tempted by the fowls, bread, eggs, or what other things it contained ; and on one occasion, O 7 ' being overcome, took some of the food, then covered up the basket and delivered it as usual. But the man who received it took up a little piece of paper (which of course contained a list of the articles) from the basket, looked at it, and then said, You have taken a loaf and so many eggs. The native, horror-struck, confessed his sin, and was punished. After which he refrained for some time ; but at last gave way again and of course with the same result. He had a great fear of that little bit of paper. He thought it was fetish, tabu. Not for one instant did it occur to him that those little scratches and dots on it could mean anything, could have any sense. No, he thought the paper was alive, and that it saw what he did, and told the man. So he deter- mined what to do. The next time he felt hungry, he waited till he came to a lonely spot. Then he put the basket down, took out the bit 26 The Art of Creation of paper, not without fear and trembling, carried it off a little distance, and hid it behind a rock, where it could not see him or the basket. Then he helped himself freely, and having done so, smoothed the napkin nicely over the top, put the paper back, and delivered the basket as usual. Alas ! it was no use. The paper told all. He was punished again, and from that time he aban- doned the affair as hopeless. But if the savage takes a long time to learn that these lines and marks on paper have mean- ing, may it not also take us a long time to learn that these lines of the sea and sunset sky, these forms and colours of the trees and the flowers, are the expression of ideas waiting perhaps through the ages for their interpreters. It is curious that we admit intelligence in Man, though we cannot prove it. I am hopeful that you perceive some intelligence in me. But you cannot absolutely -prove that I feel and think : for all you know I may be merely a cleverly-made automaton. You only infer that I feel and think from a comparison of my actions and movements with your own. And so, on the same grounds, we infer intelligence in dogs and monkeys, be- cause their movements still resemble ours in some degree. [But we must remember that Descartes and other philosophers have contended that animals were merely machines or automata without feeling ; and certainly one is almost obliged to think that some of our vivisecting Pro- fessors adopt the same view.] When, however, 27 The Art of Creation we come to creatures whose movements do not much resemble ours, like worms and oysters and trees, it is noticeable that we become very doubtful as to whether they feel or are conscious, and even disinclined to admit that they are. Yet it is obviously only a question of degree ; and if we allow intelligence in our fellow men and women, and then in dogs, horses, and so forth, where and at what particular point are we to draw the line ? In fact, it is obvious that the main reason why we do not allow intelligence in an oyster is because we do not understand and interpret its movements as well as we do those of a dog. But it is quite conceivable that to one of its own kind another oyster may appear the most lovely and intelligent being in creation. Certainly it is quite probable that the feeling and consciousness in an oyster or a tree is different and less extended than in a man or a dog ; but that in its order and degree it is quite as intense and definite I hardly doubt. What is it that before all convinces us that there is an intelligent Self in our fellow-man ? It is that he has a Will and Purpose, a Character, which, do what you will, tends to push outwards towards Expression. You put George Fox in prison, you flog and persecute him, but the moment he has a chance he goes and preaches just as before. And so with all of us. Our lives, despite all the blows of fortune and misfortune, spring again and again from a mental root which we recognise as our real selves : which we want The Art of Creation to express, which we must express, and to express which is our very life. But take a Tree, and you notice exactly the same thing. A dominant Idea informs the life of the Tree ; persisting, it forms the tree. You may snip the leaves as much as you like to a certain pattern, but they will only grow in their own shape. You may cut off a branch, and another will take its place. You may remove a small twig, and even that twig will have within it the pervading character or purpose, for if you plant it in the ground, an- other tree of the same shape will spring from it. Finally, you may cut the tree down root and branch, and burn it, but if there is left a single seed, within that seed in an almost invisible point lurks the formative ideal, which under proper conditions will again spring into life and expression. I need hardly remind you here how exactly similar to that seed, is the little compressed Desire or Need which at the very beginning of this argument we saw, as it were, lurking in the human breast, and which afterwards, under the proper conditions, grew out into a House or some other great objective result in the external world. Look at the huge network of Railways, now like an immense Tree, with endless branches encircling the globe. Once that Tree slept in the form of a little compressed Thought or feeling in the breast of George Stephenson, the collier-lad, and unbeknown and invisible to any but himself. 29 The Art of Creation And now, at this time of year, there are lying and being buried in the great Earth thousands and thousands of millions of seeds of all kinds of plants and trees, which during the long winter will slumber there like little dream-images in the brain of the great globe, waiting for their awaken- ing. 1 And when the Spring comes with the needful conditions, they will push forward to- wards their expression and materialisation in the outer world, even as every thought presses towards its manifestation in us. Thus, as we think about it, it becomes more and more possible to see that this solid earth, and the great liquid sea, and even the midnight sky with its wonderful starry systems which from dream-like nebulae have gradually through the ages cohered into definite and one may say living organisms that this great world of Nature, just as much as the world of Man, is the panorama of a conscious life ever pressing forward towards Expression and Manifestation ; and that these dots and scratches in the writing, these stones and stars and storms, are words appealing to us con- tinually for our loving understanding and inter- pretation. We conclude the intelligence of our friends because we should find it absurd and im- possible to place ourselves on a lonely pinnacle and look upon those we love as automatons. 1 Who knows but what our brains in the same way are full of tiny atoms seed-atoms of desire and purpose which lie there silent and compressed, till conditions liberate them to long trains of action in the drama of humanity ? 3 The Art of Creation And in the same way, in proportion as we come to love and understand the animals and the trees and the face of Nature shall we find it impossible to deny intelligence to these. Certainly there are times, as for instance in looking at some beautiful landscape or sunset sky, when not only we seem to perceive, as the Greeks did, separate presences or spirits in the trees and the plants and the streams, but we seem to feel the overshadowing of a universal Mind " A sense sublime," as Wordsworth has it, "Of something far more deeply interfused, Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns, And the round ocean, and the living air, And the blue sky, and in the mind of man A motion and a spirit that impels All thinking things, all objects of all thought, And rolls thro' all things." Creation, then, is not an almighty/*?/, by which things are suddenly out of nothing given form and solidity or if it is, it is a process of which we have no experience, and which is unintelligible to us. On the other hand we cannot regard it as a fortuitous concourse of material atoms, because we have no experience of such atoms or of their existence ; and if Creation were such a concourse of senseless things, it would be itself senseless and mere nonsense (which it certainly is not). But it is a process, I take it, which we can see at any time going on within our own minds and bodies, by which forms are continually being generated from feeling and desire ; and, gradually acquiring 31 The Art of Creation more and more definition, pass outward from the subtle and invisible into the concrete and tangible. This process, I say, we can observe within ourselves in the passage from Emotion to Thought, and from these again to Action and the External world. It is the foundation of all human Art. The painter, the sculptor, the musician are for ever bringing their dreams of Beauty and Perfec- tion forward from the most intimate recesses and treasure-houses of their hearts and giving them a place in the world. And not only the Artist and Musician, but every workman who makes things does the same. The world of Man is created by this process ; and I have given reasons for supposing that the world of Nature is con- tinuous with that of man, and that there too innumerable Beings are for ever labouring to express themselves, and so to enter into touch and communication with each other. [The reader may say there is no evidence that man ever produces a particle of matter directly out of himself; and I will admit that is so. But there is plenty of evidence that he produces shapes and forms, and if he produces shapes and forms that is all we need ; for what matter is in the abstract no one has the least experience or knowledge. All we know is that the things we see are shapes and forms of what we call matter. And if (as is possible and indeed probable) Matter is of the same stuff as Mind only seen and envisaged from the opposite side then the shapes and forms of the actual world are the shapes and 32 The Art of Creation forms of innumerable Minds, our own and others, thus projected for us mutually to witness and to understand. However, there I leave the argu- ment.] I will only, in conclusion, say that in this view Creation is a stupendous and perpetually renewed work of Art, an everlasting evolution and ex- pression of inner meanings into outer form, 1 not only in the great whole, but in every tiniest part ; Nature is a great vehicle, an innumerable network P and channel of intelligence and emotion ; and this whole domain of the universe the theatre of an immense interchange of conscious life. Countless hosts of living beings, of every grade of organisation and consciousness, are giving utterance to themselves, expressing and unfolding that which is within them even as every child of man from birth to death is constantly endeavour- ing to express and unfold and give utterance to what lies within him. With incredible speed the messages of these intelligences flash through space ; " the Morning Stars sing together " ; the messages of light and sound and electricity and attraction penetrate everywhere ; and as modern science shows us that the air, the sea, and the solid frame of the earth itself may be the vehicle of waves which without wire or definite channel may yet convey our thoughts safely to one another 1 I have in this paper dwelt only on this one aspect of the World and Existence that of its movement outwards its generation and birth. There is of course and necessarily, an opposite aspect of equal importance that of its absorption and involution from the outer to the inner. 33 C The Art of Creation through intervening leagues of distance, so surely we must believe that the countless vibrations ever going on around, and ever radiating from and impinging on every known object, are messengers too of endless meaning and feeling. The intelligences which constitute the universe are doubtless of infinite variety and of infinite gradation in development. Some may find expression in a mere point of space, others may enclose a planet or a solar system. Some are harmonious and accordant together ; others may be as we well know in violent mutual hostility or warfare. Yet in the end they are included. To regard the world as simply an arena of separate warring beings and personalities is im- possible, because (as all Science, Philosophy, and Experience convince us) there is inevitably a vast unity underlying all ; and all these beings and personalities must root down in one ultimate Life and Intelligence ; all of them in the end and deep down must have a common purpose and object of existence and in that thought there is liberation, in that thought there is rest. 34 Ill MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS THE world consists of what is (or can be) known or perceived. There is no other world obviously that we know or can know anything about. But what is this act of knowing, which is so important ? Every act of knowing involves three aspects, which we cannot avoid, and under which (by the present nature of our minds) we are forced to re- gard it. There is (i) the knower or perceiver, (2) the knowledge or perception, (3) the thing to be known or perceived. I say we cannot imagine the act of knowledge or perception ex- cept in this triple form. For the first analysis of the conception of knowledge implies and compels the thought of a knower either oneself or some one else. If it is our own knowledge, then we cannot avoid the thought of self as the knower ; if it is knowledge in some far planet, totally beyond our sphere, still we are forced to think of it as entertained by some being, be it beetle or angel, who is thus the knower. And without 35 The Art of Creation some knower the conception of knowledge is (to us) meaningless. 1 Similarly the act of knowledge at first analysis yields a " thing to be known" ; we cannot avoid thinking there is something of which we have the knowledge or perception. If an impression is made on our mind the very word connotes, as Herbert Spencer says, " something that im- presses as well as something that is impressed," or, in other words, the " modification of our mind " which we call knowledge compels us to look for something which causes the modification. We are startled by a thunder-clap ; instantly we ask, What is the thunder, what is behind it ? We are told that it is Zeus, or God, or Elec- tricity. The answers do not bring us much further, but they indicate the conviction that there is "something." This habit of the mind of positing a something behind and different from the knowledge itself may be foolish, but it is apparently quite inveterate and unavoidable. Though we do not seem able to say what the " thing known " is, we seem to see quite clearly that is not the knowledge. Here is a violet. 1 Thus J. F. Ferrier in his " Institutes of Metaphysics" gives it as his first and foundation proposition that "Along with what- ever any intelligence knows it must, as the ground or condition of its knowledge, have some cognisance of itself" j and later, " The objective and the subjective part do together constitute the unit or minimum of knowledge." Sir William Hamilton also says, " In the act of perception Consciousness gives us a con- joint fact, an Ego or mind, and a Non-Ego or matter, known together and contradistinguished from each other." Some modern psychologists have endeavoured to impugn this view, but not very successfully. (See note, p. 70, chap, v.) 36 Matter and Consciousness The least thought shows us that the colour of the flower is largely in our own sensations. The same of its odour. We know that such colours and smells appeal differently to different eyes and noses. What then is the violet " in itself" ? We do not know ; we are tempted to say that it cer- tainly is not the violet that we see and smell. Yet we are compelled to believe that there is an entity there. And in all our knowledge and perception, whatever it may be, we cannot get over this ascrip- tion of an Objective side to it, as well as of a Sub- jective. Even in our dreams, those most tenuous phantoms, we are oppressed with a sense of their " reality." The distinction of Subject and Object is funda- mental in our minds (as at present constituted). Practically all the philosophers agree in this and there are not many things that they do agree about. All our knowledge implies and involves these two aspects. There is always an Ego side to it, and always a Non-Ego side. Consciousness to use the simile of Ferrier is like a stick. It has two ends, and without the two ends we cannot imagine it. All knowledge, be it great or small, simple or complex, has two poles, the subject and the object. The least atom of the knowledge (as in a magnet) has the same con- stitution. All our knowledge is saturated and inter- penetrated by the union and distinction of subject and object. And we are compelled to think it so. 1 1 Kant's doctrine of Causality as a necessary form of the understanding comes to the same thing. The experience, 37 The Art of Creation Nevertheless, it need hardly be said, this an- alysis, in young children, animals, and very primi- tive folk, scarcely takes place. The knower, the knowledge, and the thing known are in experi- ence undistinguished, darkly confused together, as it were one ; the Ego quite dim, only now and then, so to speak, suspected ; the thing to be known and the knowledge frankly unseparated. This may be called the state of simple conscious- ness. Yet again we, considering it, are com- pelled, if we believe there is knowledge, to believe also there is a Knower and a Known, an ego side and an object side even though these sides, in the simple consciousness, have not yet become separated. Once then the Nature of knowledge, as above indicated, is seized, many things easily follow. In the first place, it is obvious that Matter, per se, as an independent entity supposed apart from some act of knowledge, is absolutely unknown to us. Matter, of course, is a general and in its way useful term for the supposed objective entity underlying phenomena and our sensations. I say that to figure this entity as independent and apart from mind is impossible. For knowledge is the subject plus the object, the object plus the subject. It is, and always must be, relative in some degree to the Subject or Ego. Something therefore not relative to any ego or subject, but having an whatever it is, is at once conceived as having a cause ; and this cause is projected into space, as the object. Thus subject plus object is the necessary form of Thought. 38 Matter and Consciousness independent non-mental existence of its own, can- not be known. It cannot even be imagined. The instrument or act of knowledge being itself partly subjective can only at best give us information of some joint relation between self and the sup- posed external entity ; and if the " thing outside " can exist without relation to any self or ego, all knowledge is absolutely silent about it. If there is an objective and material " violet " existing inde- pendent of any conscious mind (either its own or any other), we know and can know nothing what- ever about it. 1 It follows, therefore, that all the talk about a mechanical structure of the universe as of dead ' matter,' which, apart from any kind of con- sciousness, moves in obedience to laws of its own; and all the talk about senseless atoms which fly and spin and collide and rebound, and so by unwitting mechanical or chemical processes build up the world we see, is itself senseless, and may be at once dismissed, not only as having no mean- ing, but as being incapable of meaning to us. We cannot think such matter or such atoms, and the 1 " Some truths there are/' says Berkeley, " so near and obvious to the mind, that a man need only open his eyes to see them. Such I take this important one to be, to wit, that all the choir of heaven and furniture of the earth, in a word, all those bodies which compose the mighty frame of the world, have not any subsistence without mind ; that their being is, to be perceived or known ; that consequently so long as they are not actually perceived by me, or do not exist in my mind, or that of any other created spirit, they must either have no existence at all, or else subsist in the mind of some eternal spirit." 39 The Art of Creation more we try the more we see our inability. Atoms there may be ; but if we are to think them, we must think them as related to Mind either as being centres of consciousness them- selves, or as being outlying elements (thoughts) in wider systems of consciousness. We may, of course, think them as being our own thoughts about an unknown objective world (which no doubt they to a large extent are) ; or again, we may think them as thoughts conveyed to us by another mind or minds (in which case the objec- tive world is conceived of as mental in character). But as ' matter ' which might conceivably remain and pursue its course even in a world from which intelligence had departed, we cannot think them. Again, as " dead Matter " is nonsense, so is another term, lately much used, namely, " un- conscious Thought." The very expression is of course self-contradictory. If there is thought, there is consciousness of some kind ; we cannot imagine it otherwise. In strict language the expression is nonsense. But loosely we know that it is used to indicate that in sleep and at other times processes resembling thought seem to go on (either in portions of our minds or bodies or elsewhere), of which we have no con- sciousness or memory, but of which we use the results. Now, of this there may be two interpretations : either we may suppose conscious thought (in a strict sense i.e. conscious to our own or to some other self) to be really going on in the region indicated ; or we may suppose (and 40 Matter and Consciousness this is the view I think most generally enter- tained) that non-conscious cerebral, mechanical, and chemical changes are taking place which simply turn out at last a result translatable, and so made use of, as conscious thought. Now the latter supposition we must dismiss ; for we have already seen that non-conscious mechanical and chemical actions convey no meaning to our minds and are really inconceiv- able. We are therefore compelled to adopt the former supposition, namely, that " unconscious Thought " is really conscious thought of some kind, but inherent in or related to another self than our own. And anyhow it is far simpler, and more natural and intelligent, to suppose this than to call in by way of explanation a mechanical non-conscious process which, when we come to look into it, proves meaningless and unimaginable to us, and therefore to be no explanation at all. In the third place, from the Nature of know- ledge it follows that, like Matter, the Ego, per se, as an independent entity supposed apart from some act or possible act of knowledge, cannot be even' conceived to exist. For the knower, the knowledge, and the known are one from the beginning ; and though the one differentiates into three aspects, we cannot separate these aspects. The stick has two ends, but we cannot separate the end from the stick. And if we could, what satisfaction were it to have an end without a stick ? The Art of Creation Of the Ego we have a consciousness, but only in the act of perception or knowledge (which at the same moment involves the consciousness of the Non-Ego). When there is no act of know- ledge, there is no consciousness of the Ego. [But, as we shall presently see, when the know- ledge becomes perfect knowledge, then the con- sciousness of the Self also becomes complete.] We cannot be conscious of our ego as unrelated and independent ; for consciousness (in the ordi- nary sense) of course means relation. This consciousness of the ego, present in the act of knowledge, gradually evolves, as we have seen, and becomes distinct ; indeed, it becomes to us the most real thing in the world. It pursues us everywhere ; we refer everything to it. Yet it remains curiously simple and unanalysable. We cannot avoid it ; but we cannot analyse it, for the simple reason that as soon as it is envisaged // becomes the Object, and the real Ego is found to be again at the hither end of the stick. This action is very curious. However intimate the Thought one may entertain, the Ego is instantly beneath it, and more intimate suggesting the idea that it (the ego) is a kind of widely-dif- fused substance of Mind, of which thoughts are modifications. Indeed, the idea is suggested that possibly all egos are in essence the same that they are portions or branches of one universal mind-stuff, of which all thoughts and existences are modifications. However, leaving these last considerations aside 42 Matter and Consciousness for the moment, we see this curious fact, that while we feel the ego as a simple unity, we are compelled to think it (if we think of it at all) as enormously complex, or, at least, as having the potentiality of enormous complexity. For obvi- ously the self which entertains or is related to all our knowledge and experience cannot be less complex, or have less potentiality of complexity, than the knowledge and experience to which it is related. Consequently, the self appears at once as a simple monad, and an infinite complexity of possible relations. In the fourth place, having cleared the ground somewhat, the question arises, Are we now in a position to get a clearer idea of the Non-Ego or of * Matter ' ? If we have some conception of the nature of the ego (as we are compelled to conceive it), does that throw any light on the nature of the non-ego? If the ego is impressed, what is that unknown thing which impresses it ? or, If the ego enters into relation, what is that correlative unknown thing which enters into relation with it ? or, to put it in the plural, In a world of egos capable of entering into relation, what are the correlative Objects ? But since there is no such thing as dead Matter, the only answer we can think is : the objects are other egos. The egos enter into relation with each other. I say we cannot think otherwise, for we have nothing to place at the other end of the stick, except something similar to what we have at the 43 The Art of Creation hither end. We know of nothing else. In all our experience the self and its knowledge are the only things we know of. We may not be right in our surmise, but if we think at all, we are compelled to think thus. There is a certain probability, besides, that one end of the stick is similar to the other. If Subject and Object are correlative, as we are forced to think them, then it is hard not to suppose the object similar in nature to the subject. We conceive the subject as a self or intelligence which is one and yet in- finitely complex and it is difficult not to con- ceive of the correlated object or objects as one or many similar selves one and yet infinitely complex the kind of thing which physical science, along its own ways, is constantly search- ing for and assuming to exist. Thus, as in the last chapter, we arrive at the conclusion that Knowledge, Perception, Con- sciousness 1 are messages or modes of communi- cation between various selves words as it were by which intelligences come to expression, and become known to each other and themselves. All Nature all the actual world, as known to us or any being we have to conceive as the countless interchange of communication between countless selves ; or, if these selves are really identical, and the one Ego underlies all thought and knowledge, then the Subject and Object are the same, and the World, the whole Creation, is Self-revealment. 1 In its ordinary form. 44 Matter and Consciousness In these few remarks on Matter and Con- sciousness generally I have endeavoured to set out not so much what is, as what we are com- pelled to think, as this indeed seems the safer thing to do. How far what we are compelled to think may be taken as evidence of what is, is another question, which I will not tackle, but which the philosophers deal with. I will only quote the following remark of J. F. Ferrier's, from the Ontology section of his " Institutes of Metaphysics " : " No Existence at all can be con- ceived by any intelligence anterior to, and aloof from, knowledge. Knowledge of existence the apprehension of oneself and other things is alone true existence. This is itself the First, the Bottom, the Origin and this is what all intelligence is prevented by the laws of reason from ever getting beyond or below." 45 IV THE THREE STAGES OF CONSCIOUSNESS OBSERVATION of the actual facts of life seems to show us pretty distinctly that there are three stages or degrees of Consciousness ; and a con- sideration of the nature of knowledge, as set out in the foregoing paper, would tend to make us expect such three stages. There is first the stage of Simple Conscious- ness, in which the knower, the knowledge, and the thing known are still undifferentiated. Though we cannot observe this directly, nor draw the exact line at which it begins or ceases, we seem to be able to discern its existence clearly enough in the animals. The thought of self as the knower has not arisen upon them, except in low degree and in a few cases ; and certainly the thought of the object as distinguishable from the knowledge or perception of it has not arisen. It is the same with very young children and some primitive men. And this non-differentiation of the self in consciousness explains in these cases various facts which are puzzling to us. The horse in the field stands out, patient and placid, through hours or days of cold and rain, simply because not having a distinct consciousness of 46 The Three Stages of Consciousness self, it cannot pity itself. It feels discomfort no doubt ; it may feel pain ; but it does not project itself and think with dismay that itself will be feeling this discomfort, this pain, to-morrow. Small babies have little fear, for the same reason. [Nevertheless, Fear in the higher animals and young children apart from a mere instinct of escape is there, and often very strongly ; and this shows us that the consciousness of self is dimly beginning. Fear, in fact, is an inevitable accompaniment and means of the evolution of that consciousness ; it is the midwife of a birth which in the far past of the human race has ac- complished itself with much suffering.] The knowledge and perception of animals, therefore, owing to this non-differentiation, and owing to the absence of certain causes of disloca- tion and trouble, is extraordinarily perfect and untampered. It is from the first a part of Nature, and has a cosmic universal quality about it. Their knowledge is, as it were, embedded in the great living intelligent whole (of the world), and therefore each special act of knowledge or perception carries with it a kind of aura or diffused consciousness extending far, far around it. We are aware of this aura or " fringe " of consciousness in ourselves, and the modern psychologists have dwelt much on it. Seton Thompson, in his " Wild Animals I have Known," speaks of them as being "guided by a knowledge that is beyond us " ; and in his description of the wild horse which " in spite of all reasons to take 47 The Art of Creation its usual path " came along another and so avoided the pitfall set for it, he says, "What sleepless angel is it watches over and cares for the wild animals ? " and again, " But the Angel of the wild things was with him, and that incom- prehensible warning came." This daemonic or quasi-divine knowledge is as we shall see largely lost in the second stage of consciousness, but restored again in the third. The second stage is that in which the great mass of humanity at present is ; it is that in which the differentiation of knower, knowledge, and thing known has fairly set in. The consciousness of Self becomes more and more distinct, and with it the consciousness of an object antagonising the Self. Some folk say they remember the moment when, as quite young children, to them with a sense of alarm self- consciousness suddenly came. They were sud- denly terrified at the thought of self, as of a separate item or atom in this vast world. Whether suddenly or gradually, this feeling of course has come to every one. Its arrival can generally be noticed without difficulty in any young child. It is the beginning of a new era in its development, and from that moment life begins to shape round the self. But at the same moment, or very shortly after, the child begins to recognise the self in others in its mother and those around. And what is curious and interesting the child ascribes ' selves ' also to toys, stones, and what we call 48 The Three Stages of Consciousness inanimate things. In fact, simultaneously with the appearance of the subject in consciousness comes the appearance of the object in consciousness. It is curious that at these early stages the object of knowledge and the knowledge should be differen- tiated from each other, or begin to be differen- tiated ; but it is so. The child feels not only (as we do) that there is a personality behind the appearance of its mother, but that there is some- thing behind these stocks and stones, and personi- fies them also. So does the savage. It is the period of fetishism, which correlates with and accompanies the first evolution of the idea of self. 1 And in very truth, feeble and inadequate as this ' anthropomorphism ' may be, it will be seen (from what has already been said) that the child, in this respect, is wiser than the man, that its view is really more logical and rational than that of the ' practical ' person who contends that the stocks and stones are the real objects, or who posits, in order to explain them, an ultimate ' matter ' devoid of intelligence. Anthropo- morphism is inevitable to us (in this second stage), and much the best we can do is frankly to accept it. Such then is the first birth of self-conscious- ness. But as the evolution of the idea of self goes on, there comes at last a kind of fatal 1 Later, as the consciousness of the ego evolves, and deepens and lifts, so does the form in consciousness of the object ; and the fetish-beings become gods ; and the gods rise to greater nobility and majesty. 49 The Art of Creation split between it and the objective side of things. The kindly beliefs of early peoples in beings similar to themselves moving behind and inspir- ing natural phenomena, and the consequent sense of community of life with Nature, fade away. The subject and object of knowledge drift farther and farther apart. The self is left face to face with a dead and senseless world. Its own importance seems to increase out of all reason ; and with the growth of this illusion (for it is an illusion) the knowledge itself becomes dislocated from its proper bearings, becomes cracked and impotent, and loses its former unity with Nature. Objects are soon looked upon as important only in so far as they minister to the (illusive) self; and there sets in the stage of Civilisation, when self-consciousness becomes almost a disease ; when the desire of acquiring and grasping objects, or of enslaving men and animals, in order to minister to the self, becomes one of the main motives of life ; and when, owing to this deep fundamental division in human nature and consciousness, men's minds are tormented with the sense of sin, and their bodies with a myriad forms of disease. Physiologically, this period is marked by the growth of the Brain. In animals the cerebrum is small ; the great sympathetic system of nerves and the cerebro-spinal system are relatively large. The cerebrum is only, as it were, a small organ attached to these systems to subserve their needs. But the growth of the intellect is at first stimu- lated by the growth of the 'self and its needs. 5 The Three Stages of Consciousness And in man the cerebral portion of the brain, as specially the seat of self-regarding relations, rises into immense importance ; and over a long period lapses into a kind of conflict with the great sympathetic system which, without doubt, is the great organ of the emotions. The emotions and the intellect of man for a long period are at variance, and distress and grief ensue in the mind, as (owing to the organic disharmony) pain and disease prevail in the body. Finally, with the complete antagonism of sub- ject and object, of 'self and 'matter,' and all the antagonisms which follow in its wake of intellect and emotion, the individual and society, and so forth and the terrible disruptions of life and society which ensue comes the third stage. When the illusion of separation is complete and the man has sounded the depths of grief and pain which accompany this illusion, then, one day, often suddenly, the third form of Consciousness dawns, or flashes, upon him that which has been called the Cosmic, or universal, Consciousness. The object suddenly is seen, is///, to be one with the self. The reconciliation is effected. The long process of differentiation comes to an end, and reintegration takes its place. The knower, the knowledge, and the thing known are once more one " Objects turn round upon themselves with an exceedingly innocent air, but are visibly not the same.*' This form of Consciousness is the only true knowledge it is the only true existence. And The Art of Creation it is a matter of experience ; it has been testified to in all parts of the world and in all ages of history. There is a consciousness in which the subject and the object are felt, are known, to be united and one in which the Self is felt to be the object perceived ("I am the hounded slave"), or at least in which the subject and the object are felt to be parts of the same being, of the same including Self of all. And it is the only true knowledge ; for we saw at the beginning that the knower and the thing known are aspects of the act of knowledge, implicit in it, and not to be separated from it (the knower without the know- ledge, or the thing known without the knowledge, being both unthinkable). Therefore they are really one in the knowledge ; and though a dif- ferentiation takes place in consciousness (thus immensely enriching the knowledge), yet as soon as ever it becomes a separation, and the subject and object are thought of as isolated things, (separate ' selves ' and ' atoms,' for example), it has already passed over into a sphere of illusion and folly, and has become nonsense. The true knowledge, therefore, is that in which the subject and object are known as one ; and is of course a much higher and more perfect form of know- ledge than that first as in the animals when subject and object are one, but never having been distinguished are not known as one. When this consciousness comes it brings with it a strange illumination. For the object and the ego are felt to be one, not only through the 52 The Three Stages of Consciousness special act of knowledge which unites them, but deep down in their very essence. A circle is, as it were, completed ; and the external act of know- ledge is no longer merely external, but is trans- formed into a symbol of a vast underlying life. The aura, in fact, of the animals returns with greatly increased intensity : to such a degree, we may perhaps say, that it becomes the main thing, and the object or external experience is only of importance as waking it. It is not merely that the object is seen by the eye or touched by the hand, but it is felt at the same instant from within as a part of the ego ; and this seeing and touching wake an infinite response a reverberation through all the chambers of being such as was impossible before. The knowledge, in fact, loses its tenta- tive illusive form of thought, and acquires a cosmic universal character. It becomes luminous with far-reaching interpretations. How shall we denote or explain these things ? It is obvious that mere thought (belonging to the second stage of consciousness) does not and can- not possibly cover them any more than a man can walk a square mile. Thought can and does bring us to the edge of the third stage, and within sight, as it were, of the essential facts of the universe ; and its value, in that respect alone, is immense ; but, like the mule at the edge of the glacier, there is a point where, from the nature of the case, it has to be left behind. We cannot obviously prove the ultimate constitu- tion of things. But that which the third order S3 The Art of Creation of consciousness conveys, we can illustrate and symbolise in thought. To illustrate the two orders of consciousness we may, for instance, figure a tree in which two leaves observe each other externally for a long enough time, mutually exclusive, and without any suspicion that they have a life in common. Then the 'self consciousness of one of the leaves deepening inwardly (down the twig or branch), at last reaches the point whence the 'self of the other leaf also branches off and becomes aware of its unity with the other. In- stantly its external observation of its fellow-leaf is transformed ; it sees a thousand meanings in it which it never saw before. Its fellow-leaf is almost as much an expression of self as itself is ; for both now belong to a larger self that of the spray or branch from which they depend. Or when two strangers, of different race and tongue perhaps, meet, they eye each other with suspicion and misunderstanding, and seem to catch only at the most external knowledge of each other to notice the slant of the brow or the cut of the clothes. But when two folk know each other in the sense of love (love being a consciousness of the third kind), instantly a word or a glance of the eyes, in the external world, reveal abysmal depths in the two selves, and a sense of age-long union. Without the external knowledge the two could not know either them- selves or the other person (since, as we have seen, the self without the knowledge is unthinkable) ; 54 The Three Stages of Consciousness but in the second case the knowledge is trans- formed, and reveals meanings and depths of the self unimagined before. In the case of two persons the transformation of knowledge in the third stage of consciousness is easy to understand, since here the so-called subject and object are commonly recognised to be of the same nature, and to have some degree of identity. But in the case of a man observing, say, a tree, we find it more difficult. Yet in truth the process appears to be quite similar. Some people, like Jacob Boehme, the mystic, have been conscious of the hidden qualities of plants and trees they looked on ; l and innumerable instances of ' second-sight,' well authenticated, must con- vince us that, in cases, the direct external act of perception brings with it far outlying and under- lying tracts of knowledge and illumination. The external knowledge is transformed by being brought into relation with the original source of knowledge, i.e. the unity of all beings. It is, in fact, that hidden knowledge realised and made external. To borrow a simile from electricity, the luminous arc springs into being when the circuit is complete, and is the evidence and mani- festation of that completeness. This third mode of consciousness is, I say, the only perfect knowledge ; for the first mode (though nearer to the third than the second is) is merely inchoate ; while the second mode is sheer 1 And it is probable that many primitive folk, as well as animals, have, on an inferior plane, intuitions of the same kind. 55 The Art of Creation illusion. It, the second mode, is all built upon the separation of the self from the knowledge and from the object (i.e. from other selves). It is therefore built upon an illusion, and is itself illusion. Its form is not true knowledge, but Thought. Thought is an aspect ; it is the last disintegration of knowledge. It is the fact seen from just one most particular and separate point of view. The (hidden) fact being the unity of my 'self with that of the tree, all my thought about the tree is an attempt to get at that fact from ever -shifting, ever - countless sides; but remains profitless, barren, productive of little but unrest and disappointment till the moment when the reintegration takes place, subject and object close in one, and the innumerable thoughts fusing in the intense heat of union lose their separateness, and merge in perfect light. Herbert Spencer touches this point with a kind of unwilling illumination when, speaking of the impossibility of knowing the "substance of Mind," he says, 1 " A thing cannot at the same instant be both subject and object of Thought ; and yet the substance of Mind must be this before it can be known." Certainly, a thing cannot at once be subject and object of thought, i.e. of the second stage of consciousness ; because this stage is built on the separation and antagonism of subject and object. But that a thing may be subject and object of the third stage experience shows ; and the ' thing ' that thus becomes both subject and 1 "Psychology," i. p. 148. 56 The Three Stages of Consciousness object is the ' self ' (which corresponds to Spen- cer's " substance of Mind "). Thus we conclude that the self or substance of Mind (though it cannot be known in the second stage) may or must be known in the third stage of conscious- ness ; and indeed that this is the only way in which it can be known. Of the existence of this third form of con- sciousness there is evidence all down History ; and witnesses, far removed from each other in time and space and race and language, and per- fectly unaware of each other's utterances, agree so remarkably in their testimony, that there is left no doubt that the experience is as much a matter of fact as any other human experience though the capacity for it is of course not universal. The authors of that extraordinary series of writ- ings, the Upanishads, founded evidently the whole of their teaching on this experience. Their object in the teaching was to introduce others to the same knowledge : " He who beholds all beings in the Self, and the Self in all beings, he never turns away from it." " When to a man who understands, the Self has become all things, what sorrow, what trouble, can there be to him who once beheld that unity ? " " Tat tvam asi, Thou art that, Thou art that," says his father to Svetaketu, pointing to object after object, and trying to make him feel that the subtle essence of all these things is his true Self. 57 The Art of Creation "Knowledge has three degrees," says Plotinus " opinion, science, illumination. ... It [the last] is absolute knowledge founded on the iden- tity of the mind knowing with the object known" " God is the soul of all things," says Eckhardt, " He is the light that shines in us when the veil [of division] is rent." Whitman speaks of the light that came to him : " Light rare, untellable, lighting the very light, Beyond all signs, descriptions, languages," and says " Strange and true, that paradox hard I give, Objects gross and the unseen soul are one." And Tennyson, in a well-known passage, dis- tinguishing the ordinary knowledge from the other, says : " For Knowledge is the swallow on the lake That sees and stirs the surface- shadow there But never yet hath dipt into the abysm, The Abysm of all Abysms, beneath, within The blue of sky and sea, the green of earth, And in the million-millionth of a grain Which cleft and cleft again for evermore, And ever vanishing, never vanishes. . . . And more, my son ! for more than once when I Sat all alone, revolving in myself That word which is the symbol of myself, The mortal limit of the Self was loosed, And past into the Nameless, as a cloud Melts into Heaven. I touched my limbs, the limbs Were strange not mine andjf/ no shadow of doubt, 58 The Three Stages of Consciousness But utter clearness, and through loss of Self The gain of such large life as matched with ours Were Sun to spark, unshadowable in words, Themselves but shadows of a shadow-world." And so on. 1 But it is not only the great pro- phets and seers who prove to us the existence of another stage of consciousness. For to almost all mankind flashes (or glimmers) of the same thing come in those moments of exaltation or intuition which form the basis of religion, art, literature, and much even of practical life. Schopenhauer, who has written well on Art and Music, says that Art and the sense of Beauty give us the most real knowledge of things, because then we see the object as the " realisa- tion of an Idea " (i.e. as a form, according to him, of the world-soul) ; and the beholder (who has the same world-soul within himself) " becomes the clear mirror of the object," and " the distinction of the subject and object vanishes." And every one, whether he agrees with Schopenhauer or not, must have felt in poetry, music, and art generally, and in all cases where the sense of Beauty is deeply roused, that strange impression of passing into another world of consciousness, where meanings pour in and illuminate the soul, and the " distinction between subject and object " vanishes. 1 Dr. R. M. Bucke in his great work on " Cosmic Conscious- ness" (Philadelphia, 1901) has gathered together the utterances of a vast number of witnesses, and shown very convincingly their remarkable agreement as to the nature of this conscious- ness. His prefatory essay on its evolution is also instructive. 59 The Art of Creation The evidence, I say, for the existence of this third stage of consciousness is ample and con- vincing ; and though to do the subject justice would require a volume, yet we can see even from what has already been said that this cosmic sense is perfectly normal and in the line of human progress, and that it surpasses the ordinary con- sciousness of the second stage as far indeed as that surpasses the first. It is indeed, from its very nature, as already explained (i.e. union of subject and object), the only true and absolute knowledge, and this view of it is corroborated by the testimony of those who have experienced it. It is also the only true existence (at least that we can imagine), for, as we have seen, the world consists of what is known, i.e. of what enters into consciousness. Con- sciousness is existence ; and the perfect conscious- ness is the perfect and true existence. That universal consciousness by and in which the subject knows itself absolutely united to the object is absolute Being. All things, and the whole universe of space and time, really exist and are in this third state ; a state where every object (or portion of the whole) is united to every other object (or portion) by infinite threads of relation l such infinitude of relations constituting the universal consciousness as embodied in that object. This 1 Such a state is, of course, assumed by all physical science as the ground of its operations ; and it is the (illusive) dream of science to be able to completely analyse it. 60 The Three Stages of Consciousness is the state of absolute Being in which all things are, and from which the things which we ordi- narily see and know proceed by disintegration or ignorance. It is the state from which they lapse or fall by disintegration into ordinary conscious- ness or thought. That is to say, the real tree exists and can be seen in the resplendent light of the universal consciousness ; but the tree which we ordinarily look upon is only the merest aspect of its infinitude, a few isolated thoughts or rela- tions which the botanist or the woodman may happen to separate off and call the tree (the method of Ignorance). All the universe exists, and is in this third state of consciousness ; but we in the strange condition of illusion which belongs to the second stage exiles from the Eden-garden, persuaded of the separateness of our individual selves, and unable to enter into true knowledge are content to gnaw off tiny particles, which we call thoughts, from the great Reality. Assimilating and digest- ing these as best we can, we are persuaded that some day, putting all the results together, we shall arrive at the Reality. But the quest by this method is obviously hopeless. Infinities of in- finity stretch before us, and vistas of brain- gnawing misery. Arrive doubtless we shall, but it will be by another route. One day when man has passed the ' rodent ' stage he will enter quite naturally and normally into another world of being, surpassing that in which he now lives, as much as the present surpasses the world of simple 61 The Art of Creation consciousness belonging to the snail or the fish. Then, though he will perceive that his illusions of 'thought' and 'self have not directly opened the door for him, he will find that they have fitted him for a realisation of the Truth, such as perhaps he could have obtained in no other way. 62 V THE SELF AND ITS AFFILIATIONS WE have seen three things in the two preceding papers ( I ) that we first become conscious of the ego as part of the act of knowledge, and appar- ently inseparable from it ; (2) that there is a stage of meagre false knowledge connected with the illusion of a separate self; and (3) a stage of full, vastly-extended knowledge connected with the (restored) sense of union between the ego and the object. We have now to see how far we can get a clearer idea of what we mean by the ego or self. But as a preliminary we may lay down two pro- positions, which will be useful later on. Firstly, though we are not conscious of the self except in some act of knowledge or consciousness of an object, and though consequently we cannot think of the self as existing altogether apart from knowledge, we can think of it as going to know, or having known (i.e. as potential of knowledge). Thus I think of myself as existing in sleep, as an ego that did know yesterday, or will know to- morrow, or I think of myself as perduring from one act of knowledge to the next, and so as it 63 The Art of Creation were forming a link between the two acts. This does not of course prove that I do so exist ; and many psychologists argue that this idea is an illusion, and that the ego simply perishes in sleep, or with each act of knowledge the reappearing ego in each case being an entirely new one. But practically we think as I have indicated ; and in fact life being founded on this assumption (of the possibility of the duration of the ego in an un- manifested condition) we accept it until such time as we find some explanation more adequate and satisfying. 1 Secondly, this thought of the self as ante- cedently capable or potential of knowledge com- pels us to think of the knowledge as in some degree dependent on the self. In other words, since knowledge is always relative to the subject, the subject in every case contributes something without which the knowledge (at any rate in that form) would not exist. This flows obviously from things that have already been said, and it might seem unnecessary to dwell upon it ; but it has important bearings. Practically the matter is very evident. Not only awaking from sleep do we immediately recognise what the objects around us are, because, in fact, we have the memories or images of them already in our minds ; but the simplest observa- tion of things involves a similar antecedent condition the knowing what to look for. How 1 We shall see later that there is reason to believe that the ego in sleep passes into the third stage of consciousness. 64 The Self and its Affiliations hard to "find the cat" in the picture, or the wood-cock in the autumn leaves, till the precise image of what one wants to see is already in the mind, and then, how easy ! The townsman walking along the high-road perceives not the hare that is quietly watching him from the farther field. Even when the countryman points it out with all circumstance, he fails ; because the kind of thing he is to see is not already in his mind. Why is it so difficult to point the con- stellations to one who has never considered them before ? The sky is simply a mass of stars, it is the mind that breaks it into forms. Or why, look- ing down from a cliff upon the sea, do we isolate a wave and call it one ? It is not isolated ; no mortal could tell where it begins or leaves ofF; it is just a part of the sea. It is not one ; it is millions and millions of drops ; and even these millions are from moment to moment changing, moving. Why do we isolate it and call it one ? There is some way of looking at things, some preconception, already at work, in all cases, which determines or helps to determine, what we see, and how we see it. All nature thus is broken and sorted by the mind ; and as far as we can see this is true of the simplest act of discrimination or sensation the knower selects, supplies, ignores, compares, con- tributes something without which the discrimina- tion or sensation would not be. Every one has experienced the magic of the musician, " that out of three sounds he frame, not a fourth sound, but a star." The three first 65 E The Art of Creation notes are mere* sounds, noises; but with the fourth, the phrase, the melody, the meaning, suddenly descends upon us from within ; an answer comes from the background of our minds which transforms mere noise into music. Brown- ing suggests that this magic is exceptional ; but it is universal. All life is made of it. When the phrase or the melody have come to vibrate with meaning, then concatenations of phrases and melodies roll up into the huge symphony, which now we call an inspiration though once it too was only noise. So too the incidents, the events, the meanings of life roll up. The trees, the moun- tains, people's forms and features, become lumin- ous. Why do you see expressions, motives, emotions, in folk's faces, broad as day, which others never even suspect or imagine ? The lines, the movements, are the same for everybody ; but it is your mind that interprets. Always these knockings going on at the outer door of ourselves, and always something from within descending to answer and ever new and newer answers as the years go on. Nor does it seem by any means sufficient to explain these answers in each case as merely the result of summations or associations of previous experiences partly because of the very newness of the answer (as of the ' star ' in the music, or the expression on a loved one's face things which though they may be called forth by experience are like no other experience) ; and partly because, as I have hinted, when we go back to the most 66 The Self and its Affiliations primitive sensations we seem to find the same thing. Buried in the Self from the beginning are these affections. Browning indeed does not men- tion that exactly as the melody though made of or provoked by four sounds was utterly different from the four sounds or their summation, so each musical sound itself was a ' star ' in com- parison to the air-pulses that provoked //. Why should 270 taps in a second on the drum of the ear call forth the fairy C* from the hidden chambers within ? or so many billions on the retina the magical and beautiful colour of blue ? We cannot resist the conclusion that the qualities of things, the bitter, the sweet, the rough, the smooth, the lovable, the hateful, the musical, the brilliant are given already in the mind, though elicited by the outward phenomena, whatever they are ; and that, allowing all we may for the gradual building up of knowledge from outside and its gradual transformation, there remain nevertheless the forms under which we receive this knowledge from the mere sensations of touch or taste or colour or sound, up through the moral and mental qualities, to such things as the sense of self or of duty, and far beyond which in a vast and ascending scale the ego, or hidden knower, contributes as its share to the solu- tion of the marvellous problem ! Having then cleared the ground somewhat by means of these two preliminary propositions (i) that the self or ego may (provisionally) be thought of as existent in sleep or in an unmanifested 67 The Art of Creation condition ; and (2) that it must be thought of as contributing the (or a) formative element in the knowledge which comes to it we may proceed farther on the way. And first let us take, with respect to the nature of the self, the evidence of the third stage of Consciousness, such as we have it. We saw that in this third stage the subject and object are seen, are known, to be united, to be essentially one. This is the unanimous declaration of the witnesses, and we know also that the witnesses are by no means few or insignificant in the history of the world. If then we accept their evidence we must believe the final and real Self to be one and universal. For if A knows his essential identity with all the objects a, b, <:, &c.; and B also knows the same ; then A and B know their essential identity with each other, even though they may never have seen each other. And so on. All our ' selves ' consequently must be one, or at least united so as to be branches of the One even though for a time deluded by the idea of separa- tion. The ground of the universe must be one universal Self or one Eternal City of selves, ever unitea and ever arriving at the knowledge of their union with each other. But since the evidence of the so-called Cosmic Consciousness is yet scattered and unauthoritative, and by no means universally accepted, we may, in the second place, consider what proof we may be able to get from the ordinary processes of thought and consciousness. And even by these we seem 68 The Self and its Affiliations to be led towards the same conclusion, and to have the way up the higher slopes indicated though of course the mule stops short at the edge ! In fact, analysing one's own mind, one of the first things that appears is that the ego underlies or accompanies every thought. It is always I know, I think, I feel, I remember, I desire, I act. Though some thoughts are moderately simple, and some exceedingly complex, though some take their colour from others or derive a halo from the ' fringe ' of unobserved thoughts round them, 1 still inevitably whether in the wholes or whether in the components the ego is there ; and we become convinced at last that if we could reach even the simplest and most elementary sensation of which we are capable, the ego would underlie would be a part of the knowledge, even though not distinctly differ- entiated in consciousness. The ego, therefore, underlying my every possible thought and even if I lived a thousand years and shared the thoughts of all folk on the globe, it would still underlie them and under- lying too the most elementary sensation I can 1 By some it is supposed that it is by the action of this ' fringe ' that the fourth note becomes a ' star ' by, in fact, waking myriads of unobserved associations. But again though there is some truth in this view we must note that the mere summation of associations, however numerous, will not create a new feeling. And we may also point out that the ' fringe ' taken in an extended sense brings us back again to the unconscious, unmanifested ego. 69 The Art of Creation possibly conceive myself having cannot be a thought itself. 1 And so we are forced to think of the ego either as a kind of unitary being separate from all thought (which of course won't do) ; or else as an infinitely complex unity capable of every conceivable thought in fact a universal Being. But here, alas ! we come to a fatal crevasse beyond which the four-footed creature cannot go. For as soon as we think of the ego, the ego has already become a thought and ceases to be the ego we are in search of. Obviously, therefore, thought can be no more made use of in the matter, and the only course that remains seems to be to fee! (as we instinctively do) that the ego is a unitary Being ; and to see that directly we try to think it, its first form is that of an infinite complex capable of every conceivable thought 1 Professor W. James suggests in speaking of the "stream of consciousness " that " the thoughts themselves are the thinkers ! " (" Textbook of Psychology," p. 216.) But we really cannot accept this conundrum. I am not the knife which I handle or the ideal which I imagine. Practically the mind is compelled to believe in a self distinguishable from its own thoughts, some- thing underlying and unitary which gives the sense and measure of sameness and continuity; and whatever subtleties may lead it away, the human mind will inevitably return to this view the old antithesis of Being and Existence, of ' substance ' and ' accident,' which cannot be avoided if we are to think at all. See also W. Wundt's " Human and Animal Psychology" (Sonnenschein, 1894), p. 250, where we read, "Self is not an idea it is simply the perception of intercommunication of internal experience, which accompanies that experience itself." That is, the Self is the perception ; the thoughts are the thinkers. But it is evident that this view creates more confusion than it dispels. 70 The Self and its Affiliations at the same moment acknowledging that in the act of thinking it we have already departed from its essence. I shall now therefore assume, both on account of the direct evidence of the Cosmic Conscious- ness, and because the indirect evidence of the ordinary thought and consciousness points in the same direction, that there is a real universal self a one absolute Ego and knower, underlying all existences the Tat tvam asi of the Upanishads, the essence and life of the whole universe, and true self of every creature. And I think we are justified in assuming this, because clearly the evidence of the ordinary consciousness, however long we work at the problem, can never carry us a step farther than it does now ; while on the other hand the direct evidence of the Cosmic Consciousness is added to by fresh witnesses every day, and daily becomes more conclusive. There is therefore, I say, a real universal Self, but there is also an elusive self. There are millions of selves which are or think themselves separate. And over these we must delay. For to see the connection between them and the one Self is greatly important ; and we may be sure that the illusive self is not for nothing ; indeed the term ' illusive ' may not after all be quite the right one to apply to it. Let us ask two questions : 1. How can the great Self also be millions of selves ? 2. If the great Self is within each of us, and 7i The Art of Creation the ego of every thought, why do we not know it so ? (i) How can the great Self also be millions of selves? Well, we may ask, How can the self of the human body also be millions of selves in the component cells of the body ? For modern science more and more attributes selfness and intelligence to cells, 1 and more and more tends to establish the intimate relation between the self of the body and the selves of the cells. How can a man be one self in his office, and another at his club, and another in his domestic circle ? How is it that plants and low animals multiply by fission ? Do the selves multiply ? Or, since a self is not necessarily to be thought of in space and time, can one self have many expressions in space and time, i.e. many bodies ? or is it possible even that one self may require many bodies ? Such are a few out of many questions that arise on the subject. The fact remains apparently (though we are not in a position yet to see all round it) that a self may become many selves, or that it may have 1 See Binet on the " Psychic Life of Micro-Organisms," where he maintains that infusoria exhibit memory, volition, surprise, fear, and the germinal properties of human intelli- gence. (Though such words as memory, volition, surprise, and fear must certainly be used with the greatest caution in this connection, yet the facts seem to show that there is a "sensi- bility " in these little creatures corresponding to the germ of these human faculties ; and none the less real because it relates itself to chemical affinities. See H. S. Jennings on "The Psychology of a Protozoan," American Journal of Psy- chology, vol. x.) 72 The Self and its Affiliations many selves affiliated to it. In the human body the cells are differentiated in a vast number of ways, according to their service and function in the body. The intelligence of each cell is an aspect or a differentiation of the intelligence of the body. The great Self of the universe may dif- ferentiate itself into countless selves or ' aspects ' and this may be a condition of more perfect self- knowledge yet each self or aspect may still be the whole and commensurate with the whole. " One eyesight does not countervail another," says Whitman. Ten thousand people gathered round an arena may see one another and the whole show, each from his own -point of 'view. Each onlooker sums up the Whole, represents the Whole ; but each from a different side. Each eyesight is individual and complete ; yet it does not interfere with any other. The fact is conceivable that the Self may be- come countless selves. The great Self is omni- present in Space and Time ; but if it appear or express itself at any one point of space and time (say as the ego of a single cell), then at once and in that moment it has determined an aspect of itself; and the ego in that cell is already an individual having within itself the potentiality of the whole, yet different 1 from every other possible individual of the universe. The fact of such multiplex appearance in Space 1 Theoretically this would appear so though the extreme conclusion (that every cell represents a separate and eternal Individuality) need hardly be pressed. (See next chapter.) 73 The Art of Creation and Time is conceivable ; the reason for it may be that of self-knowledge ; but the " how " of the operation must necessarily remain inscrutable to our ordinary thought. Leaving the matter thus, we may now then pass to the further question, (2) If the great Self is in each of us, and is the ego of every thought, why do we not know it so ? And the answer is not difficult to frame. It is a ques- tion of degree of expression. We only know that of which we perceive the reflection. Suppose the great Self, now incarnate as the ego of a single cell, to receive some simple sensa- tion, to exercise some most primitive and elemen- tary act of knowledge. Then, from what has been said a few pages back, it cannot do that except because the knowledge is in some sense implicit in itself, and called forth by the outer phenome- non (whatever that may be). There is a meet- ing of subject and object, a reflection of one in the other, a consciousness but of very low degree. In the ego all knowledge (so we are at liberty to suppose) is implicit yes, in the ego of that single cell universal knowledge, as fr6"m that particular individual point of view. But that knowledge though implicit is not expressed ; only the lowest degree of it has come into consciousness. The ego, therefore, has only to that degree become conscious of itself. Perhaps the sense of touch has wakened within it, but no more. Certainly the consciousness of its own universal being, of its true self, has not been excited or called forth. 74 The Self and its Affiliations As much of itself as has been reflected in the phenomenal world, it is conscious of with the order of consciousness that belongs to the phe- nomenal world, but no more. 1 But presently another sensation comes along, or rather another happening which calls forth a sensation, say again of touch. Many such touches may come,, and still there is no particular growth of consciousness. But one day the sense of like- ness between them arrives. And it arrives from within. Doubtless there may be a real outer relation of likeness between the touches, or the objects that cause them ; but until the ego sees and seizes that relation, contributes it from within itself, there is no sense or perception of likeness for it. Thus now the ego of that cell has arrived at the degree of consciousness represented by the sensation or perception ('recept') of likeness 1 Though our thought of course cannot compass this whole matter, we may help it out by the analogy of a fourth dimen- sion. If this being which descends and manifests itself in tridimensional space is in fact a being of four-dimensional order, then that conception helps us to understand both its ' thereness ' prior to manifestation, and the possibility of its manifestation being multiplex, though itself one. For if we suppose a three-dimensional object say the hand with fingers downward coming down into two-dimensional space say the surface of still water, then we have a similar case. The hand is one, and it is ' there ' prior to touching the water. Its first (multiplex) appearance on the surface is in four separate points, the finger-tips. Let us suppose now the under surface of the water to be a mirror, and suppose too the finger-tips to be pro- vided with eyes ; then as the fingers descend below the sur- face they will see themselves by reflection first as mere nails, then as first joints, and so on ; but always as entirely separate objects, till the moment when the body of the hand passing below the surface, reveals their union. 75 The Art of Creation and it has arrived there by the way of reflection in the objective world. It is clear that that ego being already a more or less individualised aspect of the universal Self, will see and seize and group the happenings of the external world in some degree differently from any other individual 1 that is, its sensations and perceptions and inner qualities will develop and become manifest in consciousness according to its own law and order of exfoliation. The happen- ings of the external world will have their say certainly, and must not be minimised. They may retard or hasten the process ; they may modify the outer embodiment ; but it hardly appears that they can alter the general order of inner evolution. As experiences multiply for our imagined ego at last a cluster of sensations, perceptions, latent associations, instincts, memories, thoughts, and feelings fears, desires, wonderments is formed about it, and float around. These are all qualities of the ego active as well as passive called forth doubtless by the outer world, and used to give form and outline to its dealings with the outer world, but coming down from within. They are exfoliations or expressions of the ego ; 2 1 Though the differences, at any rate in the early stages, may be very slight. 2 Thus the instinct of self-preservation and that of race- propagation appear in the very earliest creatures, long before actual self-consciousness has arisen because, in fact, these instincts embody the primary need of the ego, i.e. that of expression race-propagation being a device for securing expression in another organism when the first has perished. 76 The Self and its Affiliations they are the ego coming to consciousness of itself but within every one of them lurks still the fathomless Being, and that which is unexpressed. This is the stage of Animal Consciousness, full of keen perceptions, sensations, instincts, and dis- closing even higher powers of the mind ; but still the thought of Self is not there ; it has not yet come to reflection, to consciousness ; the cluster of thoughts around the ego has not yet been distinctly conceived as a separate cluster separate from the rest of the world ; there is no know- ledge of the real self, none of the illusive self O even. Yet the thought of self must arrive some time, to give a further unity to all experience. It must arrive, and from within, because the self is a reality in a sense the only reality 1 and selfness must necessarily be one of the forms of its expression. But the mark of the individual Self is its differentiation, its distinctness, even in some degree its separation from the others. And so we find the first form in which the self fairly comes to consciousness is that of separation. One day (and this happens probably in the higher animals, certainly in the human child) the thought of ' Me ' arises ; and from that moment O a great new stage of evolution, of exfoliation, has begun the stage especially of Humanity. Now what is this thought of Me ? It is evi- dently another generalisation, another form, which the ego at a certain stage projects, and 1 Even as an individual the self is a reality through its affiliation to the great whole. It is a "son of God." 77 The Art of Creation classifies and colours the world therewith. Just as at one stage in human evolution the sense of melody came with the power of giving new meaning to an otherwise disconnected series of sounds, so at another stage the sense of me-ness comes and throws a colour and an associative bond over all the experiences of the ego. "It is me," " It is mine." All this manifold cluster of thoughts and feelings is now grouped and con- ceived of as Myself, as Me. And this is all right in a sense ; for they are the expression (so far) of the great individual Ego. But it is clear that here two mistakes are inevitable to occur. In the first place, the little cluster is almost certain to be mistaken for a kind of fixed and final Me. It is looked upon as the real self, whereas at best it only represents the tiniest portion of the real self: it is, by the very act of being conceived, only an objectivation of the reality ; while the ego itself sinks fathomless behind. And in the second place it (the Me) does not only appear as a complex of thoughts and feelings (representative of the ego), but is inevitably confused with the objects which excite those thoughts and feelings, which are the occa- sion of them, and in which they are reflected. Thus the body, the clothes, the goods, the pos- sessions, are at first conceived as the Me. " They are me," " they are mine." It is as a child who, first seeing his reflection in a glass, thinks the reflection is the real thing, and something inherent in the glass, and in that special bit of glass. So 78 The Self and its Affiliations the vast immortal Ego finds itself reflected, and first becomes conscious of itself (on this plane) as the local and limited Me, tangled apparently and bound in what are called material things. From all this arise two illusions, inevitable to this stage of self-consciousness, and full of sorrow and suffering to mankind. The ' I ' is thought of as perishable ; and it is thought of as separate. It is thought of as separate, because the Me and the Mine (that is, the conditions and surroundings which reflect the I) are in these early stages quite local and limited, and therefore as long as the I is confused with the Me the self must be thought of not only as different, but as isolated, separate, enclosed, and apart from others. 1 And it is thought of as perishable, because it is confused with the things of the outer world and the perishing flux of phenomena. But because, sitting on the bank of a stream, my reflection in the water wavers and shifts, that does not show that I am moving. Through a glass darkly we come at first to the knowledge of ourselves. For ages and ages the primitive Man peered in ponds and streams, in bits of shining flint or metal or shell, and saw strange obscure visions, which he credited to these objects, nor knew or perceived that they were dim images of his own person. Or if he did guess that they were images, he thought that he himself by some 1 Hence, too, of course, the mind in this stage only functions in the second degree of consciousness, already described, in which subject and object are conceived of as separate. 79 The Art of Creation magic was tangled in them. 1 Only at last, and with greater experience, did it one day flash upon him that He was different, and by no means to be confused with streams and shells. Only at last did his true identity come to him. And only after long experience does the sense of our true Identity come to us. And as the civilised man who has learned what reflection is can now see his own face almost where he will in pools and rivers and polished surfaces nor thinks it only confined to some mystic shell or other object, so our true Identity once having been learned, our relation to our body having been completed, we shall find that the magic of one particular body is no longer necessary, since out of the great ocean of Nature we can now pick up our own reflection (or make to ourselves a body of some kind) practically anywhere. So for a long time the ' Me ' goes on growing. Every new thought or experience that is added sinks into the Me ; and as long as the ruling idea of the Me as a separate -perishable entity governs the cluster or organism, so long do greed and fear, hatred and jealousy, sorrow and grief, increase and multiply and hover round, till their presence grows wellnigh insupportable. Yet all the time the ego, the real self, is behind, waiting for its next development, its next expression which must inevitably come. 1 Hence the universal dread among primitive folk of having likenesses or images of themselves made, and their fear of the enchantment of mirrors. 80 The Self and its Affiliations We have dealt much in similes. Let us return once more to the child regarding its own reflection say in the tiniest of tiny pools. So small is the little mirror that it only reflects the smallest part of the child a lock of hair, a portion of its dress. The child does not in the least recognise what the reflection is. But it has a water-can and pours water into the pool, and the pool grows. Now the child can see its own entire hand in the water. It is fascinated, and tires not to pose its fingers in every way for reflection. But again the pool goes on growing, and more of its body becomes visible, till at last, lo ! the child can see itself complete. So to us. Each new thought, each new expe- rience that is added to the Me, is like a drop of water that is added to the pool, 1 till it becomes large enough the Me becomes sufficiently uni- versal to reflect the universality of the I. The vision of the true Self at last arises, with wonder and revelation and joy indescribable : the vision of a self that is united to others, that is eternal. The thoughts connected with separation and mortality the greeds, the fears, the hatreds, the griefs fall ofF and a new world, or conception of the world, opens life is animated with a new spirit. The Me-conception (as far as that means isolation, mortality, ' self-seeking ') disappears, is broken up, is transformed ; and the life is trans- formed accordingly. 2 1 Added really in the last resort by ourselves. 2 Always the life, the vitality, of an organism is a reflection of its overmastering thought or conception, and in the main is determined thereby. 81 F The Art of Creation When I say the idea of the true Self arises, I do not say that at once the complete and final Individual is realised. Nature does not proceed per saltum. On the side of the past, there may yet be much "clinging to the old self"; and again, on the side of the future, there may be many new disclosures and revelations still to be made. But this stage in which the human being begins at least to realise his universal life and identity ; in which he, as it were, comes within sight of the end forms such an epoch, that it may be taken as one of the great land- marks on his immense journey a landmark more important even than that which signalled the birth of Self-consciousness. It marks the entrance to an emancipated, glori- fied, transformed Humanity, of whose further course and transformation we need not too curi- ously inquire, though we seem to discern dimly its grander lines. 1 It marks the arrival of the third stage of Consciousness, at first only occasionally and spasmodically realised, but even so guiding and pointing the way ; and finally becoming per- manent not necessarily to obliterate and negate the earlier faculties, but rather to interpret and render them for the first time really rational and meaningful. It marks the realisation at last of the whole meaning of the Universe, even though the detail thereof may be for ever inexhaustible. With a kind of inexorable logic, from infinitely various beginnings, from infinitely various sides, 1 See chap, xiii., " Transformation." 82 The Self and its Affiliations the Great Self sums itself up to form a vast affiliation of selves a Celestial City of equals and lovers. 1 " It is by love only that we can fully enter into that harmony with others which alone constitutes our own reality and the reality of the universe. We conceive the universe as a spiritual whole, made up of individuals, who have no existence except as manifestations of the whole ; as the whole, on the other hand, has no existence except as manifested in them." 1 Love, as we have already indicated, whether taken in its most ideal or its most sensuous signification, is a form of the Cosmic Consciousness. 2 M'Taggart, "The Further Determination of the Absolute," p. 56. VI THE SELF AND ITS AFFILIATIONS ( Continued} HAVING in the last paper considered the Self and its affiliations from the within point of view, we may now with advantage study the same subject on its more external side. A certain school of psychologists, in trying to explain the total consciousness of an organism as the sum (in some sense) of the consciousnesses of its separate cells, are met with serious criticism, and themselves find a difficulty, in the question of how the separate cell-consciousnesses can pos- sibly be fused in one consciousness, or how even we can conceive such a thing. How can one cell know, it is said, what its neighbour feels, or fuse its neighbour's experience with its own ? What kind of total ego is it that can possibly gather up the experiences of millions of lesser egos, and render them one ? And the difficulty is perfectly natural, and indeed insuperable, as long as the egos of the cells are held to be distinct and O separate. But as soon as we see that (as sug- gested in the last chapter) they may be the same, that they may be already one, the difficulty 84 The Self and its Affiliations disappears. We have, indeed, arrived at the conclusion that all egos are finally the same, though differing little or much in aspect, in affiliation, in ramification even as every twig on a tree dates back to the trunk, and has a common life with the others, however different from them in aspect to the outer world, or in affiliation to its main stem, it may be. And so it is not diffi- cult to conceive of them as fusing their know- ledge. Indeed it is inevitable that they should do so. Let us consider for a moment the genesis of the body, human or other. The body grows from one cell, sperm and germ united. The cell obtains nourishment (from the organism of the mother, in the higher creatures), and grows, and splits into two, four, many, and then multitudes of cells, which dispose themselves into certain forms the outlines of the growing creature. At the same time, the dividing and multiplying cells become differentiated from each other, and finally (in the human being) break up into some thirty well-marked varieties, according to their uses and functions in the complete organism. [To make the -meaning of this process clear, we must remember that we were compelled to think of the ego of that primitive cell as itself a unitary but enormously complex being, manifested at first in the lowest degree. Then we see the multiplication and differentiation of that cell simply as the process by which the various com- plexities of its inner Being are further manifested 85 The Art of Creation their manifestations, no doubt, being sundered in the world of space, but their inner nature losing nothing of its original unity.] To proceed. The growing, multiplying, differ- entiating cells are all in touch and in relation with each other ; but in time by special nerve- channels (themselves composed of cells) more special and closer relations are established, groups are formed, which tend to act and to feel together; and again in time some of these groups unite and form larger groups, and so on up to the whole organism. As to the nerve-channels, which re- prese.nt at any rate the subtler and swifter and more specialised relations (though not by any means all the relations), they are of various kinds and structure, and are minutely distributed over the whole body ; and the nerve-centres and plexuses, which bring these relations to definite focus in a vast variety of ways, are also widely distributed, not only in the brain and encephalon, but all down the spinal cord, and in the trunk of the body, where they lie embedded among the organs. Such is the process of the growth of the body ; and such as we have seen -"or very similar, is the growth of the mind. In fact in the case of the latter (using the word * thought ' to cover all affections of the mind) we have seen that a very primitive or elementary thought must first appear, that this being fed and added to by the happenings of the outer world, repeats itself and multiplies, and becomes differentiated into other 86 The Self and its Affiliations nearly-resembling thoughts, and that by degrees the ego groups these elementary thoughts into more inclusive thoughts (as when it groups a number of separate pulses into a musical sound), and then these group-thoughts again into higher group-thoughts (as when it groups musical sounds into melodies or harmonies). And as in this mental process we are compelled to think of the same ego which underlies the total mind, or one of the higher group-thoughts, as underlying also the more elementary thoughts (the same ' I ' that perceives the melody perceiving also the separate notes) ; so we may seem justified in sup- posing in the case of the bodily cells that their myriad egos form what may be called a group- soul that they are in fact one and the same with the soul of the whole body. The difference is, of course, that in the simple cell, though the total ego is ' there,' it is neces- sarily expressed only to a very simple and primitive degree, whereas in the groups of cells, especially when the latter have reached some degree of differentiation, it may be much more fully ex- pressed. We can hardly refuse too to think that not only complexity but volume of feeling depends to some extent on the largeness of the group of cells concerned. Thus in the great emotions fear, anger, &c. it is obvious that vast multitudes of cells are agitated, whole organs affected, secre- tions changed, and so forth. But in pure thought or representation where no emotion is concerned (as, for instance, in simply using the word ' fear ') 87 The Art of Creation there is no sense of volume, and probably quite a few little cells in the brain, specially differentiated to express that simple concept, are all that is required. There is no feeling probably which carries with it more permanent volume, as well as a great degree of complexity, than that of selfness ; and we may associate that with the supposition that roughly speaking all the cells of the body (through their instinct of self- preservation, if through nothing more complex) are concerned in it. I think myself (subject of course to correction) that it is a mistake to suppose that consciousness is limited to the cells in a certain portion of the brain. The hypothesis does at its best sound very improbable. Certainly it is likely that the cells of the cortex are specialised in that direction (and particularly as representatives of the second stage of consciousness) ; but this would not imply that other cells from which the cerebral cells have been differentiated have not the same faculty in less degree. To even the simplest tissue-cell one must credit sensibility, to the nerve- cells higher sensibility ; to others perhaps, as those of the Sympathetic system, simple conscious- ness ; to the brain-cells or groups self-conscious- ness ; and there must be many cells or groups which represent those higher orders of conscious- ness of which we are occasionally aware. That there is a diffused consciousness all through the body, I think any one who attends to the subject will feel persuaded and that, in The Self and its Affiliations some sense, independent of the brain. 1 It is, in fact, the primitive consciousness out of which the more complex brain-consciousness has been evolved ; and it links on to that ' subliminal ' region of the mind of which we have heard so much lately the vast 'fringe' of thought and feeling which surrounds our ordinary conscious- ness, which never comes quite into the full light of observation, and yet is always obscurely present. In these lights it does not seem difficult to think of the egos of the body-cells as one with the total Ego which represents the fusion of their separate consciousnesses one with it, though each less adequately manifested than the whole. And indeed I believe they love to feel this affiliation ; dimly they are conscious of it, and it vitalises them, presiding over and directing their activities. Now here we have to pause ; for indeed if my conscious Ego and the egos of all my body-cells 1 Stanley in his " Evolutionary Psychology of Feeling " (p. 32) says : " In man, physiologically speaking, it is the brain-consciousness that is general. But we need not suppose this to extinguish all the lower ganglionic consciousness from which it arose." And Ribot in his " Psychology of the Emo- tions " (p. 200), speaking of the nutritive functions, says : " Though in the adult they play only a latent and intermittent part [in consciousness] by reason of the preponderance of external sensations, images, and ideas, yet it is probable that in animals, particularly in voracious ones, the functions are inverted, and that coenaesthesia passes to the front rank." In fact since the brain-cells are only differentiations of the primitive body-cells, we are compelled to think of the general cells as having a germinal consciousness ; and though they may convey their coenaesthesia or common sentiment to the brain, it no less originates, and has its first birth in them. 89 The Art of Creation were in the condition of harmony suggested, all would be "pancakes and cream": the state of affairs indicated in the former chapter, "The Art of Creation," would be realised ; these bodies of ours, and the bodies of other creatures, trees, plants, &c., would be the adequate manifestations (so far) of their respective egos, and would be the forms under which we should apprehend the expression of our own and other minds. Yet clearly this is not so. I and my cells fall out to some extent. They do not always do or say what I want. There are confusions as well as fusions, alterations and alternations of personality. My body is not altogether an embodiment of my mind at any rate of that mind of which I am preponderantly conscious. What is the cause of this discrepancy or of these discrepancies? This leads us on to further considerations. Exactly as a (human) body is a complex of cells descended and differentiated from a single pair, so is a (human) Race a complex of bodies, which for our present purpose we may suppose as descended and differentiated from a single pair. I am not alluding to Adam and Eve especially as progenitors of the whole human race, but rather (in order to gain clearness) to smaller tribes and peoples such as the Maoris, or the Apache Indians, or the old Israelites much in- terrelated, and in many cases descended from a very few progenitors, if not actually (as their traditions often relate) a single pair. Such a race 90 The Self and its Affiliations has all the characteristics of an organic being : it has its well-marked customs, instincts, religion, ideals, external habits of life, grade of mental development, and so forth. It has its individual members, its groups, and larger groups, culmi- nating in the whole tribe or race as an entity, just the same as the cells with regard to the human body. And it has its phases of emotion and belief and action its patriotisms, religions, and warlike and other enthusiasms belonging to it only as a whole, and called forth somehow by the sentiment of the whole. " Crowds are sometimes accessible to a very lofty morality," says a French writer 1 " a much loftier one, indeed, than that of which the isolated individual is capable." And anyhow we see that societies, not only of bees (as Maeter- linck has shown), but of all creatures, up to man, have, qua societies, a life of their own inclusive of and superadded to that of their individual members. It is difficult therefore, in view of all this, to refuse to credit an Ego and a consciousness to a well-marked race or people or tribe ; and of course this has often been done ; while the cognate idea of the " social organism " has become a thing of common acceptance. Now if this ascription of an organic and conscious life to huge collections of human beings were merely an abstract affair, like Auguste Comte's " Humanity " or the Spen- cerian " social organism," it would be, to say the least, a trifle dull and uninteresting. But the 1 G. Le Bon, " Psychologic des foules," p. 46. The Art of Creation moment we realise that it means just the opposite something very much alive indeed, and en- tangled in the very heart of our own natures then it becomes absorbingly important. Not only do we recognise, when these huge crowd - emotions come along, that immense unsuspected forces are working within us ; but we see that at all times, in some mysterious way, the capacity of entering into the Race-consciousness is in us, and that daily and hourly this fact is moulding and modifying our lives : just the same as in every limb of my body there lurks the capacity of being thrilled by the great emotions of my total ego, and this fact in its turn guides and moulds the destinies and activities of my tiniest cells. To the more detailed consideration of this subject, and of the way in which the gods, the devils, and the great emotions represent our past in the Race-consciousness, I have given the next four chapters, so I will not dwell upon it here. We may here consider more in detail the mode of arrival of the individual ego on the scene, and his relation to the race-life. How did I arrive as regards the race to which I belong ? Why, the same protozoic cells (same in fundamental nature, or ego, and same by sheer continuity of life) which were in Adam and Eve have also produced me. 1 Or, to bring the matter 1 The immortality of the protozoic cells is now widely ac- cepted. That is to say, since these cells multiply by fission or gemmation, they do not die. If a parent cell divides into two (or four) descendant cells, the descendant cells are simply a pro- longation and multiplication of the parent life, and continuous 92 The Self and its Affiliations within more definite compass, the same cells from which Abraham and his wife Sarah sprung, pro- duced also Solomon and St. Paul. [I select the Jews as an illustration, because they afford an in- stance of a very well-defined race which, not- withstanding occasional lapses, kept itself very pure and unmixed, and, as a consequence, had the strictest customs and religious ideals, and the strongest national consciousness.] That is to say, to put the matter more definitely still, the sex-cells of Abraham and Sarah united to form a single cell, from which Isaac sprang. Every cell in Isaac's body was therefore a prolongation and fission-growth from that single cell. Isaac in his turn uniting with Rebekah (his cousin) similarly produced Jacob, who again uniting with Leah (his cousin), produced Reuben, Simeon, and Judah ; and so on. After endless ramifications in this tree with it, and so on to any number or degree of descendants. Any one of these descendant cells of course may perish by accident, but the point is that the descendant or descendants in the hundredth generation still will be the same, in being and life, with the parent cell. That it or they will have learned much on the way can hardly be doubted. Whether they will have been modified by the outer world is a point which, with regard to the sex-cells, Weismann has challenged. That the sex-cells learn, by long practice, skill in the art of self-expression is obvious from the facts of embryology and "recapitulation"; and this in itself is a kind of use-inheritance. Herbert Spencer in his " Facts and Fragments " has given reasons for supposing that even with the acceptance of Weismann's general views, use-inheritance is quite possible ; and the most reasonable theory of the whole subject seems to be that a great inner law of growth presides in the evolution of races and species, but always subject to a slow modification by the outer world in the forms of U se-inheritance and Natural Selection. 93 The Art of Creation of life, Solomon appeared, and again after more, St. Paul or Jesus. The conclusion is clear. Re- membering the immortality of the cells and their continuity of life, with of course great differenti- ations and ramifications all down the centuries, we see that a tiny group of cells in Abraham's time, themselves related to each other, and pro- bably differentiations of some one cell further back, lay beneath the whole development of the Jewish race through the centuries ; and that this latter indeed might reasonably be looked upon as the exfoliation of a single Ego which through this long chain, in hundreds of thousands of lives affiliated to it, sought expression, and so far suc- ceeded in finding it. Well might Jesus of Nazareth exclaim, " Before Abraham was, I am." His consciousness, the consciousness of his own being, had reached that depth at which it had become united with the consciousness of the race ; and in using those words he merely stated a fact which he felt within himself, and knew to be true. In this view we see and understand the enor- mous import and sacredness of sex, and its deep association with the religious and communal life of the race a thing which the earlier and less mixed races understood instinctively and appre- ciated much better than we do, but which (for reasons which may later appear) has been to a great degree lost in the modern societies and nations. The sex-cells, conserved and perpetuated by each organism, and passed on with fervent care 94 The Self and its Affiliations from generation to generation, are the most central and potent, and least differentiated of all the cells of the body the other cells losing their reproductiveness in proportion as they are more and more differentiated. They are the most re- presentative of the body and all its faculties, and within them lies the secret and heart of the race. 1 The same ever-descendant cells, I say, which produce the first man of a race, produce the last man. But the last man is not therefore the same as the first man. The first man may be merely a living soul (or psyche), the last may be a quicken- ing Spirit. The little primitive cell may grow and differentiate and grow, till that which was in it attains at last to Manhood and Deliverance. The descendant cells by ever-renewed practice, gene- ration after generation, in the expression of the Ego within them, may attain more and more facility ; the art of building up the body, tenta- tive at first, by repetition becomes easy ; and if the potency of the cells continues (which without a crossing of the strain with another race, or branch of the great Ego, does not always take 1 Ray Lankester (quoted by Geddes and Thomson, " Evolu- tion of Sex," p. 277) says, " The bodies of the higher animals which die, may from this point of view be regarded as some- thing temporary and non-essential, destined merely to carry for a time, to nurse, and to nourish the more important and death- less fission-products of the unicellular egg." And Metch- nikoff (" The Nature of Man," p. 268) remarks : " Scientific proof exists therefore that our bodies contain immortal elements, eggs, or spermatozoa. . . . These cells not only are truly alive, but exhibit properties that are within the category of psychical phenomena." He also says, " It is possible to speak of the soul of protozoa." 95 The Art of Creation place) the race in question may reach a high level of development. Thus when a man to-day, born of such and such parents, appears, his body in its early stages is rapidly and instinctively built up ; these stages summing up and embodying the evolution of the race behind it. His ego is already affiliated to that of the race ; and his unfoldment (so far) already prepared. His body, so far, represents a summation of an endless series of mental actions preceding his actual nativity, a ramifying thread of race-life, here condensed. All the instincts, all the devices, all the mental and physical adjust- ments by which during the centuries the Ego obtained expression for its own nature and quali- ties amid the outer conditions in which the race existed, are (together with that nature and those qualities) summed up and represented in his cor- poral organism ; and within it the immense heritage of race-memory is stored. The ' I,' the Ego, of his race is not only present, mani- festing itself in Time and History but an aspect, an affiliation, of it is now, to-day, present and existent in that man, in his Body. And this brings us back to that discord or discrepancy between the body and the conscious self, which started the subject of the last few pages. Is there reason for supposing a real discord between the Ego of the race, and the self-conscious individual who is affiliated to it? and is there in the body of the individual man really in some sense a seat of race-consciousness, 96 The Self and its Affiliations separate from his brain, or that part of it, which is the seat of his ordinary mind ? To take the last question first. We have already suggested that there is a consciousness belonging peculiarly to the body and its * auto- matic ' nerve-centres and ganglia, with all their instincts, habits, and organic functioning. Though these (partly from our inattention to them) ap- pear as a rule dark and silent, and beyond the region of our voluntary observation or control, yet it is becoming more and more admitted that there is a sort of ' awareness ' of them. Science is less and less able to proceed without the con- ception of the ' subliminal ' mind, or the ' sub- jective,' or the ' subconscious,' or the ' fringe ' which surrounds the ordinary consciousness ; it is more and more seen that the emotions are forms of consciousness accompanying the organic functions and secretions, and that all the processes of the body contribute their flow great or small to the life of the feelings, which again expresses itself in the life of the intellect ; there are facts such as second-sight, telepathy, and luminous sleep, which indicate states of consciousness exist- ing when the ordinary brain is at rest ; there are the facts of cosmic consciousness already alluded to ; and lastly, there is a whole series of facts with which I shall deal in the next chapters, which seem to show that there is such a thing as a race-consciousness associated with our bodily organisation and accessible on occasions to our conscious minds. 97 G The Art of Creation I do not doubt that the body and its organisa- tion are the scene and the seat of an extensive consciousness of other orders of consciousness which, though usually hidden from, or unrecog- nised by, us are still really operating within and around our minds, and are directly accessible to them. 1 But whatever consciousness may have its seat in the body, or the cerebellum, or the automatic portions of the brain, and however vast the sum- mation and expression of experience and instinct these may represent, they still do not represent the total possible expression of the Ego within. The body (at any rate in childhood) represents only the expression to which the race has attained so far. There are vast deeps of the unexpressed yet behind it. And a progressive power is needed to seek and search and devise and effect ever new advances of expression however slight. This power is the conscious Brain. It is the function of the Brain to be continually making new com- binations in which the whole Feeling-nature, can find satisfactions in other words, to be con- tinually extending the area of expression of that nature. Ever new thoughts, ever new adjust- ments, ever new combinations, it consciously 1 There is much to show that animals have some kind of direct consciousness of their internal functions ; and the Hindu yogis, who have given much attention to this subject, not only obtain a marked consciousness of their own internal organs, but an extraordinary power of voluntarily controlling them suspending at will the action of the heart, for instance, or reversing the peristaltic movements of the alimentary canal. 98 The Self and its Affiliations forms which, as they are finally accepted and grow habitual, fall back into the so-called un- conscious mind of the organism, and are replaced by new purposive endeavours. The Conscious Mind (of the second stage) is the pioneer of progress. If we take it as repre- sented by the Brain, and if we take the sub- conscious hereditary Mind to be in the main represented by the Great Sympathetic Nerve- system, then the discord or discrepancy to which we have alluded is that between the conscious and the subconscious Minds, between the Brain and the Great Sympathetic. 1 The discord is to a certain extent the progress ; and therefore we need not look upon it as bad. It is easy to imagine, and common to observe, that a consider- able and rapid mental advance may bring us into conflict with our hereditary thought and habits. 2 Nevertheless such conflict is uncomfortable and must not be allowed to continue long, at risk of mental or bodily disease. It may indicate either that the hereditary attitude has to be modified, or possibly on the other hand that a mental posi- tion has been rashly taken up which may have to be abandoned or altered. The Brain may be at fault, or, on the other hand, the Great Sympa- thetic may be. Diseases are not unfrequently 1 More strictly speaking, between the fore-brain or Cerebrum on the one hand, and the Great Sympathetic plus the hind- brain and the spinal system on the other. 2 Metchnikoff suggests that some "disharmonies" in Man are caused by his highly developed Brain bringing him into "a new path of evolution." 99 The Art of Creation the clearing and expiation of this conflict, and in that sense they too are not always to be regretted, nor necessarily to be looked on as retrogressions. But this subject, which is a large one, cannot be fully considered here. The Conscious Mind we may then regard as the latest outgrowth and expression of the un- folding Ego ; and in that sense it is very im- portant. But to expect our bodies at every moment to transform themselves into expressions of its passing moods would be an absurd thing to do. It is only the advance guard, as it were, of a moving column ; the bud on the branch ; the crest on the wave. And it is easy to see that without the other without the subconscious Mind and the life of the Body, without the great race-Mind behind it (and those other orders of consciousness) to which it is affiliated, it is but a very poor thing, and of comparatively little scope and value. It is perhaps the fault of the modern Brain or conscious Mind that it has not perceived this. From the moment when the sense of Self (as a separate being) evolved within primitive man, and entered into distinct consciousness, from that moment an immense stimulus was given to the Brain or the conscious Mind (to devise satis- factions and expressions for the individual self as apart from the race) ; and the enormous develop- ment of brain-power and thought (all in the second stage of consciousness) during the period of Civilisation goes with this fact. On which 100 The Self and its Affiliations indeed we may congratulate ourselves ; but it has led to a fearful, and for the time being most sinister, divorce between the two parts of man's nature. Amid the clatter of self-interests and self-conscious brain activities, the presence and the functioning of other orders of mind within us have been discounted and disregarded ; and, cut off from the mass and communal life around him, from the race-life behind, and the heaven- life within, the little self-conscious man has be- come a puny creature indeed. We must in the future look to a restoration of the harmony between (roughly speaking) the Mind and the Body, the Brain and the great Sympathetic, the conscious and the subconscious Man. "Why," asks Mr. W. H. Hudson in his last nature-story, 1 " why does the brightness of the mind [so often] dim that beautiful physical brightness which the wild animals have ? " The recovery of the organic consciousness, the realisation of the transparency of the body and the splendour of its intuitions, is not an impossible feat. The Hindus and other Orientals have in these directions, partly by deliberate practice, come into touch with and command of regions whose existence the Western peoples hardly suspect. In the West, the modern upgrowth of Woman and her influence will ere long make possible a Humanity which shall harmonise even in each individual the mascu- line and the feminine elements, and bring back at last the Brain and the self-conscious mind into 1 "Green Mansions." 101 The Art of Creation relation with that immense storehouse of agelong knowledge and power which is represented by the physical body in the individual, as it is repre- sented by the communal life and instinct in the mass-people. Thus finally, looking back on what has been said, we see that the whole of Creation falls together into expressions of the One endless, boundless, fathomless Self and its myriad affilia- tions expressions reached by infinite divisions into, and differentiations, fusions, and concatena- tions of the primitive elements of consciousness. Cells, plants, lichens, molluscs, fish, quadrupeds, bee and insect swarms, birds, planets, solar systems, races of men and animals, societies organisms far-stretching in time as well as in space all illustrate this conception. The whole of Creation is alive. But we now understand, when we look at a man or a bee, that we are not looking at a little separate being that has sprung as it were full-armed out of the ground in the course of a few days or years, and whose actions and perceptions are rounded by that scope ; but that we are looking at a being who stretches (through affiliation after affiliation) into the far "backward and abysm of Time," who through endless centuries has been seeking to express itself; nevertheless whose consciousness is here and now in its visible body, as well as in that agelong world-life. The ego of the Bee, we understand, is not a perishable thing of six or 102 The Self and its Affiliations seven weeks' duration, but is in its essence one with the "Spirit of the Hive" (whence comes the utter readiness of the Bee to give its little body for the safety of the Hive) ; the particular hive or colony of bees again is affiliated to the whole race of domestic bees, and this again to the further back race of wild bees ; and when our little friend comes humming along the southern wall among the early blooms in the February morning she brings (as we feel) a message not of the moment, but of things aeonian slumbering deep in our hearts as well as in hers. This aliveness of all Nature, and its derivation from one absolute and eternal Self, must be realised. And if at times the multiplexity of egos, as of gnats in the summer sunshine, in myriad procession and endless turmoil, seems appalling and fatiguing ; then at other times their fusion and affiliation with each other into larger and grander beings of comparative fewness seems consoling ; and even the conclusion of their ultimate Oneness may bring a sense of immense majesty and calm which, if it should be touched with melancholy, would lead us back quite natur- ally to the multiplexity again ! We may envisage the matter as we like, and according to our mood. Sufficient that it is a fact, which we have to realise : we may say, the fact of the universe. Let us return for a moment to the elementary act of knowledge or perception, from which we started four chapters back. I come to the gate 103 The Art of Creation of a wood and see, before me, the massed foliage and congregated stems. It seems a little matter, but within that simple act sleep the immensities. I am an artist, and the light and shade and colour attract me, rousing emotions which I do not analyse ; the whisper of the leaves and the songs of the birds wake far-back feelings dating from ancestral ages. I am a woodman, and I see the size and quality of the timber ; all the adjuncts of wood-craft the brushing, the peeling, the felling, and the hauling with horses rustle around me ; and dim visions rise of the log-cabins or wattled huts in which my forefathers lived. The mystery, in either case, and the wild life of the woods are there, though unseen ; and the instincts which led the Britons to seek them for a cover and a refuge, or the Druids to hold their worship among them. All these things are present some- how in that act of perception. And so are the far remembrance of fear and primitive terror, the vision of nymphs and wood-gods, and things deep down in the life of the animals, and of the trees themselves, or even in the life of the planet. A wonderful aura and halo surrounds that little scene from the gate, and is latent in its every detail. The young moon sails above in the pure sky of evening, and an immense peace, as of some eternal being, descends, folding in silence the soul of the onlooker. The knowledge of our unfathomable life is implicit in every least act of perception. Nor does it bar the expression of our most determined 104 The Self and its Affiliations individuality. Nay, it needs this for its expression. It stands revealed and manifest in the words and actions of humanity's best-loved children. " Afar down I see the huge first Nothing, I know I was even there, I waited unseen and always, and slept thro' the lethargic mist, And took my time, and took no hurt from the fetid carbon. Long I was hugg'd close long and long. Immense have been the preparations for me, Faithful and friendly the arms that have help'd me. Cycles ferried my cradle, rowing and rowing like cheerful boat- men, For room to me stars kept aside in their own rings." So says Whitman of the past and we need not doubt his word. And again of the future : " It avails not, time nor place distance avails not, I am with you men and women of a generation, or ever so many generations hence." And again Jesus of Nazareth says : " Lo ! I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world." 105 VII PLATONIC IDEAS AND HEREDITY THOUGH experience coming from the outer world affects the Mind (through the senses), yet the way this experience is seized and combined is largely given by the Mind itself. There is, as we have already said, a subjective element in all knowledge and without it there can be no knowledge. This subjective element may arise from previous experience, as when we recognise the hare sitting in its ' form ' in a distant field because we have already seen other hares so sitting, perhaps much nearer. The mind is ready, as it were, to take the required shape and attitude, and may do so even under doubtful or misleading circumstances, because it has taken the same shape and attitude so often before. And we can hardly doubt that through heredity also, in some way, as well as through our own individual experience, the mind acquires the habit of making certain combinations and interpretations of the outer world. But it is also obvious that there is a great deal on the subjective side of knowledge which is given antecedently to all experience, hereditary or in- dividual as when the sense of likeness or difference arises, or of size, or of number ; or when so many 106 Platonic Ideas and Heredity taps on the ear combine to a musical sound, or so many vibrations in the optic nerve to the im- pression of blue or red ; or when sounds combine to a sense of harmony or of melody ; or when cer- tain vibrations and agitations of the body coalesce to the emotion of fear, or other vibrations and agitations to love; or when certain perceptions grouped together give rise to the sense of justice, or of truth, or of beauty. In all these cases, though the mental state thus produced may grow from small beginnings and by means of experience, yet it is in a sense prior to experience that is to say, it is inconceivable that a succession of taps on the drum of the ear should be combined into one and heard as a single musical sound, unless the power of so combining taps was in the mind prior to experience. Or it is clear that two sounds might go on side by side in the ear for ever, and not be heard as harmony, unless the mind added to the two that third and separate thing which is the sense of their harmony. Cer- tainly the sense of harmony might at first be felt in some very simple relation of two notes, and afterwards might grow and be extended to much more remote and multiplex relations ; but all the same it would from the first be an original synthesis contributed from within. So of the sense of likeness or difference. In whatever un- developed mind of infant or animal it first occurs to feel that two experiences, not only are each what they are, but that they are like or unlike each other, the new experience (of likeness or 107 The Art of Creation unlikeness) is something added by the mind. It represents a new power or faculty developed, and totally unlike all its former powers and faculties. So again when a great number of inchoate movements in the tissues and nerves of the body, and agitations of the muscles, organs and secre- tions, with the internal sensations they convey, are all combined in one emotion of fear, or another set of movements and sensations in one emotion of love, these emotions are totally different from the sensations and movements so combined. They are something added by the mind to the group of sensations ; they are its way of seizing and combining the group. Lastly, certain groups of experiences excite in our minds the sense of Justice or of Truth or of Beauty ; but we are utterly unable to conceive that these great ideas are in the separate experiences or events them- selves, but they are our way of looking at them, our feeling with regard to them. I have insisted on the aspect of all these things as feelings. They are sensations, emotions, states or affections of the Mind. They are the qualities given by the mind to its various combinations of experience. Time, Space, and Causality, said Kant, are universal forms or qualities of the understanding conditions of our perception of outer experience. But (we may say) redness, blueness, sound, heat, similarity, order, harmony, love, justice, beauty, &c., are qualities given by the mind still deeper down, and projected by it into the world of space, time, and causality. They 1 08 Platonic Ideas and Heredity are the names for feelings, states, or ideas, if we like to call them so, aboriginal and primitive in the mind itself. And here comes in a most important point the distinction, namely, between the two aspects of each of these things the inner or the outer, the emotional or the intellectual, the synthetic or the analytic : the neglect of which distinction has been the cause of endless confusion. In fact, we see that each of these affections (the experience of a musical sound, for example, or of similarity, or of justice) is on one side a perfectly simple and undecomposable feeling ; while on the other side it resolves itself into a relation, possibly quite complex, between objects. Thus the sound of a violin string is on its inner and deeper side a simple and unique sensation, but in its more external and analytic aspect it appears as a series of vibrations of very complex form falling in a particular way on the ear. Similarity is from one point of view a simple state or affection of the mind, from the other it figures out in the form of multiplex relations between objects. So of Justice ; on the one side all the labyrinthine detail of statutes and courts of law ; on the other a severe unique sentiment. Herbert Spencer has a long and eloquent passage in which he shows analytically and from the intellectual side the vast complexity of love. Dr. Bucke says that love is a perfectly simple moral state defying analysis ! It is obvious that unless we recognise the 109 The Art of Creation two-sidedness of these mental states, we are liable to be landed in the utmost confusion. Let us call such a mental state (following the nomenclature of Plato, but perhaps somewhat extending it), which on its inner side appears as a simple quality or feeling, but on its outer side is a structure more or less complex, an " idea." Then the units of the mind's operations are such ideas, which on one side are relations, and on the other side are simple structureless feelings. 1 But it is to be noted that the latter side seems to be the more intimate and essential, because the same feeling may be associated with more than one set of rela- tions as when the sense of harmony in music is provoked by more than one chord, or the sense of injustice by various possible relations between folk: There is another point which must be noted, i.e. the structure of ideas with regard to one another. Thus, to take the case of music, to which we have so often referred : taps on the ear combine to the sensation or idea of sound ; but the sensations of sound combine to the idea of harmony or of melody. Harmonies and melodies again combine to a much more complex structure a musical phrase. This structure in its turn wakes an emotion, which is, as it were, the other side of it. Whenever we hear the phrase the same emotion 1 The distinction between "ideas" and concepts must be clearly held in mind. The concept of a dog is a purely intel- lectual abstraction a symbol, so to speak, of dogs in general with no feeling necessarily attached to it. An idea is not an idea unless it carries with it feeling and power. no Platonic Ideas and Heredity recurs. Finally, a whole series of phrases, with their accompanying emotions, make up a musical piece, which excites in us some still grander syn- thesis and sense of Beauty or Truth or Freedom. Let us suppose the composer's mind filled with the sense of Beauty taking some definite form. Then that single idea in his mind generates the whole musical piece. For it first of all regulates the balance and structure of the component emo- tions of the piece. Each of these emotions in its turn determines the musical phrase which expresses it. The harmonies and melodies again needful for the musical phrase determine the various rela- tions to each other of the single notes ; and lastly, the single notes determine the number of air-vibra- tions necessary for their production. Thus the whole complex of mechanical air- vibration is gener- ated and determined by the single idea or feeling of Beauty in the composer's mind, acting through lesser and subordinate ideas. And, vice versa, the public listening to the complex of air-vibrations is led up again step by step to the realisation of and participation in that same root-idea which from the beginning was responsible for its generation. Whoever clearly follows this concatenation and sub- ordination of Ideas and their creative power, has already come a long way towards understanding, not only the generation of a musical piece, but the generation and creation of all nature and human life. For the instant a new Idea or synthesis is mani- fested, say in the mind of a child (and the instant in The Art of Creation can often be observed), or in an adult mind whether it be the simple idea of number, or of harmony, or of truth, or what not it determines both observation and action : it guides as to what we shall perceive and as to how we shall act. Take the sense of Order coming to a child. The moment of this happening may often be noticed the new perception of what order means, and the new feeling of pleasure in it. The two to- gether constitute the idea of order. And at once the child sees new facts in the world around it, and arranges its life and belongings anew. Thus again if the idea of Justice is present among a people though it may be but a senti- ment at first and on its inner side, yet quickly on its outer side it gives itself structure, and regulates the conflicting desires and emotions and needs of the people ; and these emotions and desires so regulated from above do each of them in their turn generate and regulate groups of habits and customs ; and these again each in their turn innumerable individual acts. And so the idea of Justice becomes creative and alive throughout the whole State. Plato, as is well known, gave to Ideas in some such sense as this the greatest import. They existed before the world, and the world was created after their pattern (see the "Timaeus"). And we can see, from what has already been said, that they are somehow implicit in the Ego before all experience. As they descend into operation and consciousness within the Man, they shape his 112 Platonic Ideas and Heredity life and form, and through him again the outer world. Thus there is a point in evolution un- doubtedly when the thought and feeling of self- ness emerges in the child or the monkey, or another point when the idea of courage dawns on the early man or the growing boy ; and instantly in each case we see what immense vistas of life, and forms of life and action, what different ramifications and institutions of society, proceed from one such inner birth. With Plato the great ruling Ideas were Justice, Temperance, Beauty, and the like. But he also considered that there were ideas or patterns, eter- nal in the heavens, of all tribes and creatures in the world, as of trees, animals, men, and the lesser gods ; and he even went so far as to suppose ideas of things made by man's artifice, such as beds and tables (see " Republic," Book X.). Certainly it sounds a little comic at first to hear the " absolute essential Bed " spoken of, and Plato has been considerably berated by many folk for his daring in this matter. He has been accused of con- founding the idea of a bed with the concept of a bed ; it has been said too that if there are ideas of beds and tables, trees and animals, there must also be archetypes in heaven of pots and pans absolutely essential worms, beetles and toadstools, and so forth. Plato, however, had no doubt con- sidered these difficulties, and it may be worth while for our purpose to pause a moment over them. If it were the mere concept of a bed, it would 113 ' H The Art of Creation of course be absurd to give it any essential reality. For the concept is a mere intellectual abstraction derived from the perception of a great number of actual beds, and is certainly less real than the things of which it is, so to speak, a rough sketch. But the Idea, as we have said, though it may have intellectual structure on its outer side, is on its inner side essentially a feeling. It is the feeling of Bed which constitutes the Idea, and is creative. Now in Man there is essentially such a feeling a need and desire of sleep and the horizontal position. How deep this feeling may root in the nature of Man it might be hard to say, but we can see that it is very, very profound. And from it spring all imaginable actual beds, of most various shape and construction, yet all in their ways adapted and giving form to that feeling. I say the idea of Bed in this sense is rooted most deep and far back in the nature of Man. But Man himself and his nature is rooted deep in the nature of God, from whom he springs and so may we not say that in some sense the idea of Bed is rooted in the ultimate reality and nature of things ? When we see how things like beds and tables and houses may thus spring from needs or ideas, like Rest and Shelter, lying deep in the very con- stitution of man, it is not difficult to see further how the forms of man's body, and of the animals and trees and worms and beetles and toadstools, may have been (to a large extent) determined and 114 Platonic Ideas and Heredity created by the feelings or ideas slumbering within these beings. At some point the feeling of pleasure and safety in arboreal life lent form and outline to the whole race of prehensile monkeys ; at some other point the sweet sensation of con- trast between the moist darkness of the earth and the sunlit air of heaven gave birth to the vast tribe of vegetable beings, for ever seeking by upward and downward ramifications to extend the glad interchange between the two worlds. That these creative feelings did not appear to the individual animals and vegetables concerned as vast and luminous " Ideas," but only as dim semi-conscious desires, does not affect the argu- ment that in this way creation has been effected. Nor do I wish to say that this is quite the way in which Plato conceives the subject. It is more like the conception of Schopenhauer. But any- how it is an attempt to show how the Platonic ideas may be brought into some sort of line and harmony with modern science and philosophy. And it enables us dimly to see how the great panorama of creation has come forth, ever deter- mining and manifesting itself from within through the disclosure from point to point and from time to time of ever-new creative feelings or ideas the whole forming an immense hierarchy, cul- minating in the grandest, most universal, Being and Life. Here, in the contemplation of this universal Being, this primal Self of all, we are at the source of Creation. In this primal Self, and its first "5 The Art of Creation differentiation, we may suppose to exist great primitive Ideas, attitudes, aspects things below or more fundamental than Feeling, which yet work out into Feeling, Thought, and Action. These ideas are working everywhere in the great Self, and in every lesser self that springs therefrom ; and our lives are their expression (differently mingled though they be in each person, and always, owing to the conflict of exist- ence, inadequately expressed). In quite inorganic Nature, we still perceive ideas of a certain class pervading matter, like Attraction or Repulsion, Rigidity or Fluidity, Rest or Motion, which (as we have noticed before) answer to feelings which we have within ourselves. In more organic Nature we recognise Life, Sensitiveness, Selfness, Affection ; and in our fellow-man ideas of Cour- age, Justice, Beauty, and so forth. Everywhere in Creation we see ideas working which answer more or less to those within ourselves ; and it is this answering of one to the other, of the outer to the inner, which forms the very ground of all Science and Art, and the joy that we feel in Truth and Beauty. But in the Race too, as well as in the indi- vidual, these ideas are working ; and, in fact, it is through the Race largely that they gradually gain their form and expression. This considera- tion must detain us a moment, as it is important. The feelings which are an essential part of Ideas may be innate in the human mind, and the capa- city for them may be universal, but the forms 116 Platonic Ideas and Heredity corresponding may vary greatly from race to race. The feeling of number, or of melody, or of justice, may be universal in mankind ; but the arithmetical systems, or the diatonic scales, or the social institutions of the various races may be very various. The abstract feeling of number then, or of melody, or of justice, may correspond to the Idea of Plato, formless in the heavens, or in the bosom of God ; but when it comes to take form in the various races of mankind it does so with variety, according to the necessity of out- ward circumstances, and the genius and tradition of each race. Thus Plato feigns in the "Timaeus" that the universal spirit of God handed over the seeds of the immortal, imperishable Ideas to the lesser gods, who, each according to the race of men or animals over which he presided, was to embody these seeds in external forms. Thus the various races of living creatures arose all vivified from within by the eternal Ideas, yet all having their various structures according to their races, and the genius of the particular god presiding over the race. In the language of modern Science, using the term " Heredity " to cover much the same ground as " the genius of the race-god," we should say that while the ideas (say of melody and of flight in the case of birds) are the vivifying impulses of any class of creatures, the particular forms (as of songs and of wings) are a matter of slowly growing heredity and the tradition of the race. Let us take the example of Courage in man. 117 The Art of Creation At a certain stage in evolution, doubtless, the idea of Courage dawned on primitive Man. He may have fought in a scrambling, spasmodic way before that, but without any nucleus to his ardour. Now round this new idea, this new sense, a dis- tinct life grew. He admired courage in others, he strove for it in himself. And it took form. The idea (which in the abstract, or in heaven, may be formless enough) took form and became embodied in a certain type of man, according to the race, according to its tradition, according to its needs and environment. The physical and moral type of courage in the mind of a Greek (the dress, the figure, the temperament, the character) would be very different from that in the mind of a North American Indian ; and that again from the type in the mind of a modern soldier : the form depending on more or less traceable external conditions, but the feel- ing being one which comes to all races and men at a certain stage of growth. Thus Heredity comes in. The ancestors having all been accustomed to associate Courage with a certain type of man and action, we can hardly doubt that in some way (pace Weismann) the repeated impressions cohere in the descendant, or at least leave the descendant mind the more ready to respond to that particular type ; till in the course of centuries and thousands of years, a particular form rouses a particular feeling with the greatest intensity, or, on the other hand, a feeling calls up a particular form. The modern us Platonic Ideas and Heredity boy sees in a red-coat soldier an emblem of super- human valour, when a befeathered Apache brave would only fill him with contempt and ridicule. Thus the creative Idea, through heredity and individual experience combined, works in this or that form in this or that race though in the course of centuries, with changing circum- stances or development, the form too may slowly change. Or we may take the example of Love how of this inner feeling a certain external type of Woman (owing to the genius and heredity and circum- stances of the race) may become the emblem and ideal, how this type may figure as the goddess of Love for the race, and become a great power in the midst of it. Or again Justice how certain institutions getting ingrained by heredity in race- habit, as associated with this sentiment, acquire a great sacredness and authority, and are most difficult to alter though to other races or folk they may seem quite horrible. Or even of beds and tables how the idea of a bed in one race may work itself out in a ponderous four-poster, and in another in a simple mat on the ground, and in a third in the form of a hammock. Though the feeling and the need of Sleep may be practically the same in all races, yet the forms and structures in which it finds expression may be so different as to be almost meaningless and useless to those unaccustomed to them. Thus we get a glimpse of great formative ideas lying even behind the evolution of races, 119 The Art of Creation and largely guiding these evolutions (subject of course to external influences, and such things as the clashing of the ideas of one race with those of another) ; and we see how the expression of ideas, through the long race-life and the repe- tition of them in the same form, may gain an extraordinary intensity a subject to which we shall return in the next chapter. We see too in what way Plato was justified in saying that the Ideas were the real things and the mundane objects only illusive forms. For clearly the ham- mock and the mat and the four-poster, and all the countless variations of these are, none of them, the absolute essential Bed or Bedness but rather this term must be applied to that profound quality of man's nature from which all mortal beds proceed. And clearly all the horribly dis- cordant law-books and laws and law-courts and prisons are none of them Justice ; but this term must be applied to that deep sentiment of which all these are the lame expression. " For nothing can have any sense except by reason of that of which it is the shadow." And finally, we may ask whether for a true understanding of the trees and the plants and the animals we must not refer them in a similar way to the root- ideas and feelings from which they spring, and of which they strive to be the expression. To recapitulate. The creative source is in the transcendent Self of all things. This Self at its first differentiation into multiplex ' aspects ' (or 120 Platonic Ideas and Heredity individualities) manifests at the same time the Ideas which are inherent in its being ; l and these again descend into Feeling, Thought, and Action, and finally into external structure and life which latter may be looked upon as largely due to the conditioning or limitation of the ideas manifested in one individuality by those manifested in an- other. Anyhow, we can see that the manifesta- tion takes place under certain external conditions, and that by the time it descends into actual struc- ture it has been largely swayed by those condi- tions. These external forms built up in any race for the manifestation or expression of Ideas are riveted and emphasised by Heredity (or by the hammering of the race-god through the cen- turies), and acquire an extraordinary sanctity and transcendent glamour through this process, so that the mere appearance of the form instantly wakes the Idea or deep transcendent feeling which belongs to it. Thus we come near to Plato's aj/a/xj/^o-if, and see how a kind of memory of celestial visions and powers may be roused by the sight of mortal things. We see too that the self of one race, having branched off somewhere from the primal Self, 1 It is not difficult to see how the very first differentiation ol the One into the Multiple must necessarily mean the manifes- tation of certain great primal Ideas such as Union (or love), Individuality (or pride), Equality, Justice, Power (the life of the Many in the One), Beauty (the beholding of the One in the Many), Truth, and so forth. The Ideas have no force or validity of their own except as inherent in the primal Being or in those beings affiliated to it ; and Being has no differentiation except through the Ideas which it manifests. 121 The Art of Creation may embody or manifest the Ideas in somewhat different degree or different order, say from the self of another race ; and again that the indi- vidual Ego branching from the race-Ego though it carries on the general forms and ideas of the race may manifest them in different degree or combination from another individual. Yet it has to be remembered that the absolute self of the individual is still ultimately the transcendent World-self (coming down in time through the Race-self, but by no means neces- sarily tied to the race-forms), and that the indi- vidual, notwithstanding his heredity, has still an access and appeal to a region and powers beyond and prior to all heredity. 122 VIII THE GODS AS APPARITIONS OF THE RACE-LIFE WE are now in a position to understand in some degree the mysterious figures of the gods those figures which, clothed with dominion and terror, or with grace and beauty, have hovered like phantoms for thousands and scores of thousands of years over the earlier races of the Earth. When we look back at the wonderful pano- rama of them at the timeless gods of Egypt, the strange mesmeric gods of India, the just yet merciful Judges of Assyria, the gracious deities of Greece, the warlike, restless powers of Scandi- navia, the fateful, terrible gods of Mexico, and all the grotesque, half-brute, half-human idols of countless savage races ; or even at the deities and saints of the Christian Church, the Virgin Mary, the Holy Ghost, the infant or the crucified Christ, and the lesser figures grouped round them in the Catholic Heaven the question can- not but force itself on us : What is the meaning of it all ? What gave to these figures their intense reality and significance for the people over whom they presided ? For although modern Science has tackled this 123 The Art of Creation question, and although we feel that the current explanations which it gives are suggestive as of generalisations of Nature-phenomena, anthropo- morphic superstitions, idealisations of heroic men and women, and so forth, modified by traditions and memories and dreams, and complicated by mistakes in the meanings of words and names we feel also that these explanations fail almost entirely to account for the astounding power and influence of the figures concerned, or to reveal why to the savage and untutored mind mere traditions and generalisations and abstractions should have acquired such intense reality. For no one can consider the subject for a moment without seeing that for each race its gods were (at any rate in the earlier period of their apparition) actually existent beings. When we read that Pheidippides, having been sent by the Athenians to Sparta to ask for aid against the Persians, was exhausted by the way (for he covered, it was said, the one hundred and fifty miles in less than two days), and that as he rested for a moment in some quiet valley beside a spring, lo ! the great god Pan appeared to him, and his voice was heard promising victory to the Athenians ; and further, that the latter in con- sequence dedicated a temple to Pan after the battle of Marathon, and honoured him thence- forth with annual sacrifices and a torch-race we cannot but feel that whatever was the actual occurrence, the popular belief in the reality of the apparition and the voice was irresistible. Or 124 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life when in the Homeric epos Athen comes from the sky and takes Achilles by his yellow hair, and the wrathful hero, at the behest of her terribly brilliant eyes, sheathes his sword ; or when in the Ramayana the supreme god Krishna, in the form of the charioteer, holds long dis- course with Arjuna on the field of battle, speak- ing words of eternal and divine wisdom, we see that though these incidents may be literary in- ventions, they derive all their force from the fact that they would appeal to an immense and wide-spread conviction that such incidents could and did occur. Or when we come to compara- tively modern witnesses, like Saint Francis, who beheld the Madonna descend from the sky and place in his arms her Divine Son, or Catherine of Siena, for whom Heaven opened and showed her the Christ sitting upon the Throne ; or consider hundreds and hundreds of similar stories, and how the presence and activity and profound influence of such figures and beings have been admitted and accepted and insisted on by millions and millions of human kind in all races and in all ages ; and the belief in them has compelled men to every conceivable heroism and devotion, and terror of death and sacrifice it is impossible, I say, not to see how intense was the reality with which they were credited, and difficult not to suppose that (whatever these apparitions actually were) they represented some real force or forces influencing mankind. After what has been said in preceding chapters 125 The Art of Creation it may be guessed what my answer would be to these questions. It is that these figures derive their profound influence from the fact that they represent the life of the race itself; that they are the manifestation and expression of that life, of which (as far as our bodies are concerned) we are offshoots and affiliations so that through them we reach to another and more extended order of consciousness ', we partake of a vaster life, and are correspondingly deeply moved. If we look upon the vast race-life as the manifestation of one great aspect of the World-Self or Ego, and on the great formative Ideas of the race as its gods, whose essence is eternal but whose form (as we saw in the last chapter) is apparitional and dependent in some degree on outer circumstances ; then we can understand how through these forms we may enter into the race-life and the great Ideas that inspire it, and come one step nearer to the world-self. We may be lifted for a moment out of our work-a-day existence and touch upon that which is eternal. For the moment I only wish to suggest this general answer and even so I do not wish to limit the answer too much, or say that it is only through the race-life that we reach a higher order of consciousness. But certainly through the race- consciousness much may come ; and it may be worth while to consider it more in detail. In studying any phenomenon of the past it is always advisable to try and detect it in the life of to-day. And the moment we do so in this case 126 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life we see that the gods are still living and real all around us. Allowing all one may for mere cant or custom, yet there are thousands and thousands round us to whom the figure of Christ, say, is an intense, a living, and an actually present reality. It is difficult to suppose that all these people are merely deceiving themselves. One must see that whatever this figure is, or proceeds from, it is much more than the imagination of a fairy tale, and represents a real power there present and acting within the man. It is a thing of the same character as the deities of olden time. Or again, who is there so unfortunate as not to have had the experience, in ordinary daily life, of seeing some features, perhaps those of a well- known person, suddenly transformed into the lineaments of a god with the strangest possible sense of a transcendent Presence, only to be described by some such word ? Or why, on occasions, walking along the crowded streets amid all the rubbish and riff-raff of humanity, does a face suddenly appear, all glorified and shining, removed by a measureless gulf from those around and disappear again in the stream? What is the meaning of these sudden halos and glamours ? Dr. Bucke, in his " Memories of Walt Whit- man," describes the profound impression pro- duced upon him by his first interview with the poet. " I remember well how, like so many others, I was struck, almost amazed, by the beauty and majesty of his person and the gracious 127 The Art of Creation air of purity that surrounded and permeated him. We did not talk much, nor do I remember any- thing that was said, but it would be impossible for me to fully convey by words or in any way to describe the influence upon me of that short and simple interview. A sort of spiritual intoxi- cation set in, which did not reach its culmination for several weeks, and which, after continuing for some months, very gradually, in the course of the next few years, faded out. While this state of exaltation remained at its height the mental image of the man Walt Whitman underwent within me a sort of glorification (or else a veil was withdrawn and I saw him as he was and is), insomuch that it became impossible for me (I am describing the event just as it occurred, and as accurately as possible) to believe that Whitman was a mere man. It seemed to me at that time certain that he was either actually a god or in some sense dearly and entirely preterhuman. Be all this as it may, it is certain that the hour spent that day with the poet was the turning-point of my life." These words of Dr. Bucke are specially interest- ing as coming from no sentimental youth, but from a man of scientific and practical attainment who at the time of the recorded experience was fully forty years old, and superintendent of a large insane asylum ; and they show clearly enough his deliberate conviction that he beheld in O Whitman the presence of a being divine and beyond the range of mortality. Or again, we ask, why do the mountain-peaks 128 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life and the thunder-clouds sometimes take on a mystic light, and stir us with a sense of some- thing unearthly ? Why in the sylvan glades do we become aware, perhaps quite unexpectedly, of a breathless stillness and magic, and the trees stand as though the Wood-god himself were there, and the air exhales a mystery ? What is this light which never was on sea or land ? We see that these things are realities in the sense that they so deeply influence us. We surmise that they are something more than phantoms or fictions of our own individual brains. I have already touched upon the effort of Plato to explain these mysteries. Plato believed in a world of Absolute Forms and Essences remaining beyond the reach of Time. There, in company with the gods, dwelt and for ever dwell Justice and Temperance and Beauty and many other Ideas. The soul of every man in some earlier state of being, carried round in the retinue of that special god to whom he may belong, has beheld in that heavenly world these divine Essences. But fallen now to Earth it has wellnigh forgotten them. Only now and then, when the man sees some fair face or figure, wit- nesses some heroic deed or well-balanced action, or even perceives some well-formed object, is he reminded of that which is Eternal. For Plato the explanation of the Divine was easy enough. It was an cW/xi^crt? a recollection, faint or power- ful, of things once known and seen. When you set eyes might Plato say upon that face in the 129 i The Art of Creation crowd it was not so much the face itself that was divine (though it was certainly privileged so far to resemble divinity), but that it instantly recalled to your memory the form of some god seen long ago, or far down in the mirror of the mind to which god indeed your adoration and worship were due, and not to the mortal ; or if to the mortal, only so far as in him (or her) the image of the god were faintly visible. Of these celestial forms (and these are Plato's actual words in the "Phaedrus") " few only retain an adequate remem- brance ; and they, when they behold any image of that other world, are rapt in amazement ; but they are ignorant of what this rapture means, because they do not clearly perceive. For there is no light in the earthly copies of justice or temper- ance or any of the higher qualities which are precious to souls : they are seen through a glass dimly ; and there are few who, going to the images, behold in them the realities, and they only with difficulty.'* Thus for Plato the explanation of " the light which never was on sea or land " was easy enough. It was a memory of that celestial light in which the divine Ideas and heavenly beings themselves were once seen by the soul ; and indeed are (according to him) ever seen, whenso it may succeed in penetrating into that region where they dwell eternal. We have seen (in the last chapter) how it may be possible to look upon this theory of Plato's in the light of modern science and philosophy. The Ideas, we saw, on their inner and essential side 130 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life are states of being, states of feeling. It is on their outer side that they take form and structure. So that ultimately the mundane forms in which they express themselves may not only be very various (several or many forms being capable of expressing one idea), but the mundane forms are also necessarily imperfect expressions, and largely determined by external accident and circumstance. We saw also how Heredity in the race comes in to stamp and accentuate the connection between a comparatively imperfect and accidental form, and the Idea which it represents and to such a degree that at last the mere momentary sight of the said imperfect form may wake the Idea, or state of being and feeling, with the greatest intensity. Thus a real ara/xi/ijo-t? takes place that is, a re- membrance or revivifying of divine things in the mind through a mere external phenomenon. The countless memories of the race, all associated for generations with the particular object or the sum and result of these memories wake the Idea in the mind of the present individual with a seemingly supernatural force. Let us go into this subject yet more closely. We all know that the young of animals act in a way which suggests that their psychical selves, their memory and experience, are in some way continuous with those of their ancestors. Young partridges, or the chicks of the barndoor fowl, only a day old, at sight of any large bird in the air, will instantly and instinctively crouch and flatten themselves on the ground. Their alarm, The Art of Creation increased by the warning call of the mother, causes them to seek refuge under her wings. What definite form the sense of danger takes in the young chick's mind it is of course hard to say. But there it seems to be the memory of a thou- sand and a hundred thousand occasions in the history of the chick's ancestors, when the dreaded claws and beak came from the sky and snatched or nearly snatched the cowering prey. So clear and oft-repeated has the association become, that now the Vision of a bird above governs, so to speak, a whole plexus of nerves, not only in the chick, but even in the adult partridge or fowl, and sets in movement, almost automatically, a whole apparatus of muscles of defence or flight. The certainty and instantaneousness with which this happens is something astonishing. Personally I am never tired of watching my barndoor fowls on the occasions when the sweep comes to clean the chimney. On the moment when the brush emerges from the top of the chimney whatever the fowls are doing, whether they are feeding or basking, or foraging in far grounds in that instant with shrieks and screams they rush in every direction seeking for cover : convinced that an awful enemy has appeared on the roof. A cap thrown high in the air has the same effect. It is not that a cap in form or movement is so very like a bird (in fact, some of my fowls must know well enough in their hearts exactly what my cap really is), but that it wakes the latent remembrance of the bird of prey. The 132 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life fowls do not really see the cap or the chimney sweep's brush, but they see what may be called the Vision of the Ideal Hawk which is far stronger and more deeply embedded in their 'very physiology than any momentary image can be, and has a far more powerful influence on them. All this is quite like the Platonic reminiscence. We do not really see the rather commonplace features which pass in the street, but some celestial vision (in the race-consciousness) of which they remind us ; and it is this latter which agitates and transports us. At the back of our eyes, so to speak, and in the profound depths of the race- life (of which each individual is but a momentary point) is stored the remote past of the world ; and through our eyes look the eyes of dead ancestors. Thus we see not merely the bare object, but rather it is surrounded by a strange halo and glamour, which is the presence of all this past. Let us take an important and definite instance from human life. In the last chapter we spoke of Courage. In the history of nations War is of supreme importance ; and we can see how the Idea of the hero, or courageous warrior, has helped to build up every race. Working in the race through the centuries, and under certain external conditions, it has produced a certain type of warriors. Of these warriors some naturally would be more representative and efficient than others, and these would be the mighty men of valour to The Art of Creation whom every one would look up. Among early and warlike races, probably far the greater part of the activity of the male portion of the race, and of the love-longing of the female portion, has thus clustered round the figure of the mighty warrior. The man who towers head and shoulders above his fellows, who is a terror to his enemies and a fortress of strength to his friends, necessarily occupies a commanding position in the minds of those around him, be they friends or foes especially in the minds of the youth. His image is the object of their admiration and emulation, it is associated with the most thrilling exploits, it is the symbol of all they would desire to be, in themselves or their children. Every young man has had two or three such figures stamped on his brain ; between which figures there will doubtless be some degree of similarity, and some degree of blending into a joint ideal. But (and this is the important point) the same process has been taking place through the genera- tions ; and going back through the long succes- sion of any one line of ancestry we seem to see that countless images have been imprinted (each with great intensity in its time) and superimposed on one another the result being the formation of a great composite form or symbol, which, slowly altering, will be inherited by each descend- ant, and will lie there, perhaps for a long time slumbering and unbeknown to the individual, at the centre of all the emotions and activities con- cerned in warfare and patriotism, and associated '34 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life with some nerve-plexus which governs these activities and affections in the human body. 1 This composite then, like a composite photo- graph of many faces upon the same plate, will not show individual details and variations except by implication, but rather the large outlines of the group which it represents in this case the warrior-hero. In the hundreds and thousands of images which go to form it, defects, dispropor- tions, inharmonious details, will cancel each other out, and there will emerge a Form, harmonious, grand, and not far from perfect the- warrior-god, in fact, of the race the result, so to speak, of the selection and chiselling of thousands of minds through the centuries. But if in one sense this God-form is the result of the chiselling of thousands of minds, in another it is the Form which the Heroic Idea working through the centuries has fashioned for itself and has inspired the multitudinous minds to adore. It is the god himself, as one aspect of the race-life, whom we here see in his double activity both as producing certain types of man- hood, and as inspiring others to reverence and store in memory these types, so that at last 1 If it sounds too crude and materialistic to speak of an inherited composite image as dwelling in or associated with a nerve-plexus, yet we must allow that by heredity the nerves become adjusted so as to respond to images of a certain class or composite type. And if again our knowledge of nerve- plexuses is too uncertain yet to show exactly how ideas and emotions are associated with them, yet that there is some such general association is for the most part admitted by the modern psychologists and physiologists. 135 The Art of Creation through the mortal types the god himself may be beheld, and the race-life and race-consciousness entered into. There in its appropriate centre or nerve-structure of the human body the heroic Idea dwells, inspiring the blended memory of countless heroic actions, feats of bravery, struggles, defeats, triumphs, and so forth, and governing in the individual man the vast congregation of powers and activities with which it is concerned. No wonder that when the sight of a living warrior wakes this slumbering centre within the youth, devotion and emulation, excitement and the ardour of heroic deeds, for him can know no bounds. Let us take another instance. There is no class of mental impressions much more powerful and persistent through all time than those con- nected with the relation of the sexes. For ages, thousands of centuries, the Male has sought the ' D Female, the Female has sought the Male. Here we are at the very centre and focus of race-life. Love, in this sense, means union of differentiated and opposing elements, by which the balance of race-life is restored, and the self or Being who is at the root of this life comes one step farther to manifestation. This Titanic being, who through the ages (and always working subject to some external conditions) has thrown out multitudinous types, always more or less imperfect, of itself, dwells also hidden within each individual. Not only metaphysically speaking does it dwell in each individual, but through the long process of Heredity, its Form or Forms (the race-ideals or 136 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life race-gods) lie slumbering there 1 and in closest touch with all the nerve-structures and potencies which have to do with the generation of the race. Then come together two individuals whose opposite polarities and differentiations will to- gether build an adequate expression, and instantly in each other they wake this Titanic life, and the god-figures belonging to it. The youth sees the girl ; it may be a chance face, a chance outline, amid the most banal surroundings. But it gives the cue. There is a memory, a confused reminis- cence. The mortal figure without penetrates to the immortal figure within ; and there rises into consciousness a shining Form, glorious, not belong- ing to this world, but vibrating with the agelong life of humanity, and the memory of a thousand love-dramas. The waking of this vision intoxicates the man ; it glows and burns within him ; a goddess (it may be Venus herself) stands in the sacred place of his Temple ; a sense of awe-struck splendour fills him ; and the world is changed. 2 " He whose initiation is recent," says Plato, 1 As in the case of the Warrior-god, we may imagine that every man inherits from his countless male ancestors a sus- ceptibility to a certain type of feminine beauty ; and every woman from her female ancestors a susceptibility to a certain ideal of manhood. 2 The degree in which this Form comes into clear Vision may vary much with different races or individuals. In many cases a distinct vision is never realised, though it may be indicated by the agitation and excitement felt, and by the halo thrown round the mortal creature. Anyhow, it must be remembered (what we have already said) that the Idea on its inner side is a state of being or feeling, and only on its outer and less essential side a form. Aristotle calls the Platonic Ideas dta-drjTa dtdia. 137 The Art of Creation " and who has been spectator of many glories in the other world, is amazed when he sees any one having a god-like face or form, which is the expression of Divine Beauty ; and at first a shudder runs through him, and again the old awe steals over him ; then looking upon the face of his beloved as of a god he reverences him, and if he were not afraid of being thought a down- right madman, he would sacrifice to his beloved as to the image of a god." And Lafcadio Hearn, who in his " Out of the East " and in his "Exotics and Retrospectives " has written much that is suggestive on this point, says this visionary figure is " a composite of numberless race-memories . . . a beautiful luminous ghost made of centillions of memories " ; but he adds, somewhat in the spirit of Thomas Hardy, " you will now remember the beloved seemed lovelier than mortal woman could be." In truth, as we have said before, the mortal object which wakes the ideal in our minds, and the Ideal itself, though occasionally confused, are on the whole clearly distinct and separable in thought from each other. They are -perceived by separate faculties. The object, so far as it is a mortal object, is perceived by the senses, by surface sight and touch and hearing ; but not so the inner Vision. Plato says that this state of mind, in which Divine Beauty is seen (and which is asso- ciated with all real love), is a " Mania," and that only in this condition of " Mania " can the heavenly facts be perceived or remembered. 138 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life What he seems to indicate by this and what we, in modern speech, should probably say is that it is another state of consciousness which is concerned : that is, that while the objects of the outer world are perceived by us through the senses, co-ordinated under the conditions of the ordinary consciousness, these ancient (race) memories, and the feelings and visions which come with them, belong to another order of consciousness. Indeed, it almost seems obvious that it must be so. If the existence of race- memories, and of feelings and visions accompany- ing them, is allowed at all, it would seem that these things must belong in some degree to the consciousness of the race, to a less individual and local consciousness than the ordinary one. The terms ' mania,' then, or ' ecstasy,' which would indicate the passing out from the ordinary con- sciousness (into the racial or celestial, according as we adopt the modern or Platonic view), would seem quite appropriate. There is one other point just here. I say the outer object and the Ideal Memory which it wakes in the mind, though separable in thought, are for a time confused with one another. The splendours of the Ideal are showered upon and invest the object. Yet dimly the mind feels that it is remembering something, and wonders to what previous experience the object is akin. Is this the explanation of that curious sense of Familiarity, at first sight, which is so often excited by the idealisation of another person ? The Art of Creation A memory is indeed awakened, and of a figure most intimate to oneself, but slumbering deep in the recesses of one's own mind. Going back to the subject of the Warrior, we see that Hero-worship is not confined to that form. Worship of the Athlete, the Saint, the King, come under the same head. In modern Europe as in ancient Greece, the Athlete excites the mad enthusiasm of crowds. In India, as in mediaeval Europe, romance and idealism gather at least as strongly round the Saint. These are matters of race and temperament. Everywhere, with the exception of a few peoples who have advanced beyond this stage, the King is granted divine honours. No one can witness the excite- ment produced by Royalty without perceiving that it is an instinct, like that of bees for their Queen that is, a r^^-consciousness or sentiment. The glamour is that of an Idea, an Ideal King, a figure composite in the memory of the race, and the centre of its agelong hopes and fears and growth and struggle and conquest, and the glamour is readily and easily transferred to the living and actual representative, however un- worthy he may be. Almost every one recognises that it is so. The word "King" spoken to an Englishman wakens in his conscious mind a con- joint image of a succession of sovereigns from Alfred say to Edward VII. ; but to his sub- conscious self it means far far more than that. It means an epitome of the devotion, the fear, the awe, the confidence which every one of his 140 The Gods as Apparitions of the Race-Life ancestors felt towards the ruler of his day, and that not only as far back as Alfred, but into the almost unending past, when the relation of every man to his chieftain was far closer than now all this mighty mass of feeling concentrated in one great Vision of Kinghood, one instinct of devoted Service. It is obvious that this mass of feeling being still there, and still centred and co- ordinated in that particular way, it must pour itself out at some time, and the particular Royalty of the day is only the excuse, as it were, for such outpouring. But from this perception of a glow or halo round the figure of a king to his transformation into a god is but a short step. The actual mortal sovereign is identified with the immortal, ever-abiding race-memory and the idealised figure of Kinghood which dwells there. Everywhere we see this taking place. The Egyptian Pharaohs were exalted into gods. To the Roman Caesars temples were built and divine honours paid. The Aztec and Peruvian emperors the same. Even to-day, for the Russian peasant or the tribesman of Morocco, the glamour of absolute deity surrounds the Tsar or the Sultan. 141 IX THE GODS AS DWELLING IN THE PHYSIOLOGICAL CENTRES I INDICATED in the last chapter how the form and figure of the actual king may rise into that of a god through its blending with the immense subconscious emotion of the race. So of other gods and divinities. The idealisation of the Warrior growing through successive generations obscurely but powerfully in the primitive Latin folk, suddenly perhaps through the appearance of an actual man who fulfilled the ideal to an extraordinary degree may have taken definite shape and name in the figure of Mars ; who thenceforth, identified with the ideal, stood as the God of War for succeeding time. Or the enthusiasm for the Athlete or strong man, so deeply rooted in primitive peoples, may have been brought to a focus by the appearance of a real Heracles or Hercules. The names and figures, then, of these men, became for after generations the centre of this enthusiasm and deep racial instinct of admiration, and to these names were ascribed many exploits, not only of these, but of other heroes before and after. And since in any such cases of mighty men appearing 142 The Gods in the Physiological Centres among a people, the exploits which would pro- duce the most profound impression would be those which were most beneficial to the folk the slaying of monsters and wild beasts, the cleansing of pestilent swamps, the taming of oxen, the wrestling with death, and so forth so it would be these which would be enshrined in the public memory, and which (from various sources) would cluster round the ideal figure of the Hero or Saviour. This myth-making tendency of races, and the unconscious clustering of incidents and anecdotes from various sources round one or more definite figures, is of course well recognised, and explains how it is these legends often seem to contain so deep a sentiment and meaning. It is that they are the selection and affectionate preservation from the memorial life of the race of events and stories which illustrate and symbolise some deep instinct and enthusiasm of the race ; such stories being gradually and unconsciously modified into more and more of expressiveness as time goes on. In this way many great epic poems, legends, myths, and traditions of the gods have been built up. And such things have inevitably a profound sentiment in them. They are wiser than any one man could make them for they represent the feelings, the enthusiasms, the wonderments, the humour, the wit, the activities to which the race has responded for generations. If such legends and stories were merely mental ideals, if they were such handy little allegories and generalisations as The Art of Creation any philosopher or literary person might make in his study, they would be very cheap and paltry affairs. The whole point of the argument will be missed unless it is seen that the Ideas and enthusiasms which produce myths and legends lie deep down in the very structure and physical organisation of humanity, and in its very physi- ology that they are things of agelong life and importance, principalities and powers (if we may so call them) which in the form of these legends and figures are slowly rising into recognition, but which belong to another order of existence, so to speak, than that with which we are usually concerned. Here is another god, Mercury to whom among the Greeks Hermes corresponds, and who is represented also among other nations the Swift runner, the Messenger-god. It seems a little curious at first that a mere messenger- ideal should be deified. Where did the glow or glamour which transformed him come from ? But when you consider what the swift runner really represented in those days when you think for a moment what the postal service, the tele- graph, the locomotive, and all the other means of intercommunication are to us when you think of the story of Pheidippides mentioned above, a people in its agony sending their fleetest foot- racer to the neighboring state for help, and of the profound sensation, the tears of joy, the enthusiasm, the worship, with which he would be greeted on his return ; then it is easy to see 144 The Gods in the Physiological Centres that round the figure of the Messenger generally in the national consciousness a glamour would grow which would easily transform such figure into a god. And as swift communication means many things beside the delivery of messages as it means the growth of commerce, the coming into contact with strange peoples and languages and so forth so the Messenger god, Hermes, or Mercury, or Thoth, or whoever he might be, would not only be the deliverer of divine mes- sages, but would stand for the patron of all interpretations, mysteries, travel, and commerce (and so even of thieving) ! The goddess of Love and of feminine grace and beauty, Aphrodite, Venus, Freia, Astarte, is one to whom we have already referred. Her temples and worship have been honoured among almost all races. We need not go again over ground which we have already partly covered. That there is among the nerves of the human body, of the brain and of the great sympathetic sys- tem, some kind of centre or plexus, or group of plexuses, which co-ordinates and dominates the love-instinct, and that this is one of the most powerful and important centres in the body; that connected and associated with this centre and its ramifications is a whole world of emotions, desires, mental images, thoughts, acti- vities ; and that this centre, in both its physi- cal and mental aspects, is the result and growth and embodiment of centuries and ages of race- experience these are things that few will deny. 145 K The Art of Creation And that the successive images of feminine form and feature acting on this centre in long heredi- tary line may have combined to one powerful joint Impression which, even though latent in con- sciousness, dominates and moves all the race- memories of love is something which seems at least very probable. 1 The raising of this Composite, this luminous ghost, into consciousness, in the history of a race, is in this view the creation or birth of the Goddess of Love, for that race. Love itself existed from immemorial time ; but when into it a deeper consciousness began to come, it was filled with strange force and fire, an extraordinary glow and glamour, and a vague sense of divinity and of a life beyond the moment ; and when, beyond that, the race-consciousness itself in some moment of inspiration awoke, bringing the astounding reve- lation of its own memory, like a fairy mountain peak rising over the world, then the individual beheld the veritable Goddess, and divined that Love was immortal. It will, perhaps, be said that though this way of looking at the matter may account for those 1 It is important to remember, in this connection, that in all the great plexuses of the Sympathetic Nerve-system there ramify not only the nerve-fibres of the Sympathetic itself, but also nerve-fibres from the cerebro-spinal system and nerve-fibres from the cerebrum. We thus have in the case of each plexus, and brought together into one focus, capacities of immense emotional agitation (the Sympathetic), capacities of swift reflex action and response (the cerebro-spinal), and the formation of powerful mental images (the cerebrum). These three elements cannot well be separated from each other, and working together in any centre they represent a kind of daemonic presence. 146 The Gods in the Physiological Centres gods which are idealisations of human types, it does not explain why the mere things of Nature, like the Moon and the Sun, or the Darkness and the Dawn, should be personified. But the least thought shows that the anthropomorphic ten- dency is in some degree inevitable in us. The Moon and the Sun are to us what they are, only because they have appeared in human conscious- ness. Consider for a moment the latter. How many millions of times has the great Sun risen on our primitive ancestors after the dark and peril- ous night, with unspeakable sense of joy, relief, comfort ? How continually has this sense grown, with reverberant intensity in the successive gene- rations ? till at last in some more than usually subtle or sensitive soul it has broken into a strange consciousness of a Presence the -presence, in fact, within that soul, of the myriad life and emotion of those that have gone before. The rising orb, the growing glory of the sky, have wakened a multitudinous memory the memory and con- sciousness of mankind itself in its most adventur- ous and buoyant mood ; and to this child of Man, this primitive poet, the Sun has indeed appeared as not only a circle of light in the sky, but as the symbol and reminiscent vision of a majestic and celestial being, going forth to his daily conquest of the world, hero of a thousand battles, and with the magic upon him of a life immortal. Or, similarly, how often has Night descended, with a mystic sense of human terror, doubt, and 147 The Art of Creation awe, a million times distilled and concentrated ? Or seriously, can even we moderns, in tall hat and patent leather boots, regard the young Moon in the clear sky of evening without a most foolish yet poignant tenderness and romance, and a sense as if within us and through our eyes sheer myriads of other eyes were watching her ? In all these cases there is a personification truly ; but it is because what we are really coming into touch with is not the so-called Moon or Sun, or Darkness or Dawn, so much as the great sub- conscious mind of the race under its different aspects. It is in this immense world which comes down to us from the far past' that city of a thousand gates of which we in our indi- vidual bodies are but the portals, and yet into which through our bodies we have entrance that we must look for the Gods, and for all the evidences of a life which, though greater than that we commonly call our own, belongs to us and is indeed ours. And here we come again to the point which is the main subject of this chapter, the connection of it all with Physiology. All those deities I have mentioned the gods and goddesses of Day and Night, the Gods of War and of Love, the Hero-god or Saviour, the King-god or Lord of heaven, and many more, represent very distinct centres and co-ordinations of feelings and activi- ties in the race ; but they also, as we have hinted, represent very distinct centres of organic life in each human body, which is indeed an epitome of 148 The Gods in the Physiological Centres the race : they represent such physiological centres as Love, Pugnacity, Sympathy, Sleep, and so forth. The gods, in fact, may be said not only to be aspects of the life of the race, but to dwell in some sense in the organic nuclei and plexuses of the body, and to be the centres of command and service there. Strange as this may sound, it is yet most im- portant ; and the appreciation of this point gives perhaps more than anything else the key to the understanding of the religions of paganism and the past, and to the progress of humanity in the future. The body is not vile. It is not only a Temple of God, but it is a collection of temples ; and just as the images of the gods dwell in the temples of a land, and are the objects of service and the centres of command there, so, we may say, the gods themselves dwell in the centres and sacred places of the body. The one thing is an allegory or symbol of the other, and it has been the instinct of primitive humanity to express itself in this way. Every organ and centre of the body is the seat of some great emotion, which in its proper activity and due proportion is truly divine. It is through this bodily and physiological centre that the emotion, the enthusiasm, that portion of the divine Being, expresses itself; and in the pure and perfect body that expression, that activity, is itself a revelation. The total physiology of Man is, or should be, the nearest expression of divinity complete, and the replica or image of the physi- ology of the Cosmos itself. 149 The Art of Creation Once this conception of the relation of the human body, not only to the life of the race, but to the whole world of the emotions and inner life of Man, and to the panorama of his gods, is fairly seized and appropriated, many things become clear. And as we go on doubtless the whole subject will become clearer. At present, how- ever, we must pass to two other points which need consideration. In the first place, these great formative forces, Ideas, Enthusiasms, which manifest themselves in the race-life, and, clothed with emotion, dwell in the hidden centres of the actual body, are, from the nature of the case, things which we only become directly conscious of in those moments of excitement or exaltation which take us into the deeper regions of our being. Though they may be vaguely felt by the ordinary conscious- ness, they cannot very well be described in its terms. They are therefore only seen and seized in their fulness by the few by the few whose more harmonious natures fit them for the vision ; or if by the many, only in rare moments. And so it becomes the function of the inspired pro- phets, poets, artists, to give these a definite form and name as Moses did, who bodied forth Jehovah for the Jews, or as Pheidias the sculptor is said to have finally fixed and shapen the ideal of Athene for the Athenians. The many, when they see these forms bodied forth by the great Seers, leap to them and accept them, feeling distinctly enough that they answer to something which is slumbering 150 The Gods in the Physiological Centres within them, though they cannot quite seize the latter directly. The actual figures of the Gods, in fact, accepted and adopted by the various races, cannot be said to be realities, but are rather sym- bols or representations, adapted to the ordinary consciousness, of real powers working in the race and profoundly moving and inspiring it. In the second place, these real Powers (ruling in our nerve-centres as the image-gods rule in the Temples) are themselves, of course, always grow- ing that is to say, that as the race grows and branches, their forms also modify and change slowly, indeed, through centuries, but steadily. But as the images the once-inspired forms which were embodied in stone or paintings, or in holy books and ceremonials as these do not change, so in time they cease to correspond to the realities, they cease to be inspired or to awaken inspiration, and become dry and dead conventions. On this subject, however, of Conventions as affecting the Gods I will say no more here. It leads to the con- sideration of the change in religious forms and di- vinities which takes place as time and history go on, and the eternal conflict between letter and spirit. 1 Returning now to the general line of thought, I would say a few words on the subject of Christi- anity. In speaking of the genesis of the deities hitherto, I have dwelt more especially on the pagan gods of Greece and Rome. The appear- ance of Christianity on the scene marked a new 1 See "Angels' Wings," by E. Carpenter, chap. v. (Sonnen- schein). The Art of Creation growth not exactly a new growth in the history of the world, because something much (though not quite) the same had appeared long before in India and Egypt but new in the West. There was growing, in the races which gathered round Imperial Rome, a sense partly due, perhaps, to reaction from the life of the day a sense of the presence of death, a longing for some other life, a belief in the power of gentleness, meekness, chastity things which had been comparatively little considered by the preceding Nature-religions. It surely might almost be said that a new centre of organic life was forming a new plexus among the nerves of Humanity. No one can visit India without being struck by what seems quite a physiological difference between the average Hindu and the average Westerner the pas- sivity of the former, the mildness, the meekness, the meditative transcendental temper, the sense of another world, the little fear of death. His organism seems to be differently keyed from ours ; so that while the Anglo-Saxon masses are shouting themselves hoarse over a football hero or other Athlete, the Hindu peasant is paying his profoundest adoration to an emaciate Saint. That is to say, there seems to be some organic centre in each race so much more developed than in the other that it may be woken to delirium or frenzy or ecstasy by a spectacle which leaves the other unmoved. I say some such changes in the organic consti- tution of humanity were taking place in the 152 The Gods in the Physiological Centres Roman Empire, and that quite independently of the little band of propagandists who called them- selves Christians (see Walter Pater's "Marius"). Under Marcus Aurelius a wider sense of humanity was growing up. Hospitals, orphan schools, hos- pitals for animals even, began to be founded. Oriental ideas and religions and (perhaps more important still) Oriental blood and heredity began to circulate. A new type of human being de- manded new gods ; and men and women whose hearts began to respond to the power of gentle- ness, the pity of Life, the presence of Death, who, as slaves or the descendants of slaves, knew well what it was to be despised and rejected, began to see a glamour in figures of a different complexion from those which had dominated their prede- cessors. Thus at length the personality and life of Jesus of Nazareth, or at least the picture of it drawn by Paul and the Evangelists, gave form and outline to this new creative Idea, and it took the shape of the gentle, loving, and crucified Christ, the God that above all has dominated the Christian centuries. Not that this ideal was (as I have said) absolutely new ; for the glamour of it, or of something very similar (allowing for differ- ence of race and longitude), had been embodied six centuries before in the figure of the divine Buddha, and doubtless for centuries in the human race these feelings had been registered in race- memory and had struggled for expression ; but new as a recognised ideal this undoubtedly was in the history of the Western world. The Art of Creation And (what I wish to enforce) this figure of Christ written about, pictured in canvas or in stone, or in words of living eloquence, through all these later centuries has served to waken in the human mind the consciousness of a very real Presence : a Presence at least as real as that indi- cated by Apollo or Athene to a Homeric Greek : a definite individualised Power which has estab- lished itself living and moving in the Western races, and therefore also in each man or woman of these races. In this particular case we have the advan- tage of being able to analyse an actual and still operative conception of a god ; and I take it that the intense reality which this figure carries with it to many people means a great deal. It means that the figure not merely represents a mental ideal of desirable qualities, or the remembrance of a certain beneficent man who once lived, but that it represents a living focus of life in the European peoples of the last two thousand years, which has slowly emerged to conscious- ness through the accumulated race-memories of a far longer period than that. And I take it that the inward Vision of this living power and presence has in some degree come to most people who have been Christians in anything more than name ; while to some people it has come with such force and intensity that they have been per- suaded that they beheld the veritable Christ himself surrounded with glory (i.e. seen in the luminous field of a superior consciousness). At any rate to deny or utterly discredit all the The Gods in the Physiological Centres stories of the Saints, from St. Paul who saw a great light and heard a voice, onward through endless cases to modern times, would be, as I have already suggested, a parochial and purblind view to take. In the same way I think it seems very un- scientific to regard the common stories of ' con- version ' as mere fancies or fabrications. It is pretty clear that they represent a reality, a very real experience, to those concerned ; and though the * conversions ' may not be as luminous or profound as that of St. Paul, it seems to me that they are things of the same kind cases, namely, in which after long and silent prepara- tion, new centres of life are suddenly disclosed within folk, accompanied by more or less of excitement, vision, and a complete change of outlook on the world. And the stories, often fantastical enough, which accompany such con- versions, must be looked on simply as the lame effort of uncultured minds to picture and inter- pret the cosmic facts experienced. (See two interesting chapters on " Conversion " in Pro- fessor William James' book on " The Varieties of Religious Experience," in which he views conversion as a possible shifting of centres of consciousness, or as possibly comparable to the changes of equilibrium in a polyhedron, resting on one facet after another.) On the other hand, if we regard the Vision of Christ as it comes to many people even nowa- days as indicating a real power and presence The Art of Creation living and working within them, so we must of course regard the Vision of Athene, or Apollo, or of any other god that came to men and women of old, as indicating a very real and living power within them. These are names which Humanity through the ages has given to its own powers and faculties ; and every individual, as far as he has truly revered and identified himself with the God that moved within him, has so far identified himself with the life of Humanity. If we were to go to India, we should find this appearance and presence of the gods everywhere acknowledged and believed in. The vision of Siva, or Vishnu, or Brahma, or of Kali, or Krishna, or any one of the many popular saints who, having once been men, are now become divinities, is common enough. I may give one instance, which will help to remove the matter from the region of mere vulgar fantasy and superstition. Among the Gnanis and Teachers (gurus) who carry on the tradition of the ancient Wisdom-religion from very remote times, and some of whom are among the most emancipated, keen-minded, and inspired of human beings, it is said that a pupil (chela), after all instruction by the Guru, may spend a long time before his initiation is quite complete ; then, in the ripe- ness of time and of his growth, one day (or night) the God (Siva), awful and glorious in light, will appear to him clothed in the form of his Guru ; and the chela, overcome with amazement and emotion, will leap up, and seeking out his 156 The Gods in the Physiological Centres Teacher will throw himself, in a flood of tears and of gratitude, at his feet. After which his initiation is fulfilled, and he is received into the long line of those who are followers of the god. Cases of this kind I have personally heard of. (The reader also will remember the quo- tation from Dr. Bucke in chapter viii.) And there is no reason, I think, to doubt that the above is at least a fair account of what usually happens in the Indian initiations. If so, it illustrates remarkably what has been said all through namely, that when the Vision in the supernal consciousness, with its accompanying blaze of splendour, takes place, it clothes itself generally in the shape of some figure which is known to the ordinary consciousness, and which is, as it were, the best representation it can get for the purposes of the latter con- sciousness. There are other figures connected with Chris- tianity on which I can only dwell briefly. The rise of the Virgin Mary or Madonna into a goddess (with her special services and Temples), is a mark of change similar to the rise of Christ himself though perhaps not so pronounced. The Madonna links on very closely to Isis, Deme- ter, Ceres the ever-virgin, yet ever-fertile god- desses of the elder world ; yet her motherhood has more of human feeling in it and less of Nature-symbolism than theirs ; and her worship marks perhaps a growth in Humanity of filial worship and respect for Woman. When one The Art of Creation thinks for a moment of what the Mother is to every human being, of the profound impression her figure makes upon the child, and then con- siders how long, what numberless times, in the history of mankind and in the heredity of every individual, that impression has been repeated on the sensitive film of consciousness ; then one sees it as inevitable that there must come a time when the Mother-figure should be deified, and become surrounded with this halo of race-memory that a Mother-god should arise, corresponding to the Father-god of patriarchal times. (Indeed there is much evidence to show that the Mother-god is the more primitive of the two.) As to the Virgin-Mother of Christianity, it is said that St. Bernard of Clairvaux (noo) was much devoted to her. " His health' was extremely feeble : and once when he was employed in writing his homilies, and was so ill that he could scarcely hold the pen, she graciously appeared to him, and comforted and restored him by her divine presence" (Mrs. Jameson, "Legends of the Monastic Orders," p. 144). And the num- ber of similar records of Visions of the Madonna must run into hundreds, if not thousands. Whatever we think about these records, their mere existence convinces us how deep, how much deeper than just one individual life, the figure of the pure, long-suffering, tender, divine Mother has etched itself into the heart of the race. But the rise of Woman, and her influence, 158 The Gods in the Physiological Centres brought another result with it the deification of the Babe. It is not likely that Man the human male left to himself would have done this (though it appears that the Fanti on the West Coast of Africa have a curious worship of an Immortal Child). But to woman it was natural. What woman to-day bending over her sleeping infant has not at some time been aware of a Divine Child which seemed to come and blend its features with those she gazed on ? The long heredity of Mother-love and memory is there, and it is not only the little thing before her, which she sees, but the long and wondrous dream of the past which its image awakens. This glamour of the Child arising primarily in the woman, transmitted itself, of course, to the man, transmitted itself to the race generally, and becomes symbolised in such figures as the infant Jesus, the child Horus, the holy Bambino at Rome, and so forth giving perhaps a tenderness and humanity to Christianity which we miss in the earlier religions. Thus the Holy Family Father, Mother, and Child - - consolidated itself. For indeed the Family (in this close and limited form) was a peculiar characteristic of the Egyptian and of the Christian centuries ; and human life, the human organism, was establishing itself round this as one of its important centres. In the earlier and more primitive and communistic phases of society, the tribe, the gens, the clan, the demos, were the important groups the family (in the modern The Art of Creation sense) was weak. But with the rise of the Pro- perty-civilisation and the breakdown of the older Societies, the individual ceased to find his life and well-being in the tribe or community, and took refuge as it were in the lesser Family, which be- came sacred and all-important to him as the Ark of his better self and affections amid the troubled waters of external strife and competition. Thus the Family gathered sacredness through the cen- turies till it became deified in the mediaeval eye. Looking back then at what has been said, we seem to see the gods arising as Humanity's con- sciousness through the ages of its own life and faculties (called into play, no doubt, through contact with Nature). Each race, representing some aspect of the great World-self, and inspired and moulded from within by the formative Ideas belonging to it, becomes conscious of these creative powers as the Gods. The gods are in that sense real emanations and expressions of the World- self. And again each individual of the race, affiliated to the race and the gods from whence he springs or at least to whom he owes his body and his heredity does through that body and that heredity at times enter into the race-con- sciousness, and become aware of these powers working within him and the race. Each unit- mind is an offshoot of the racial mind ; each unit-body an offshoot of the racial body ; and as far as, for each individual, his mind and body register the Life and Memory of the Race do 1 60 The Gods in the Physiological Centres they form a gate of access to its particular Olympus and group of divinities. 1 In this view, Plato's heaven of eternal change- less Forms and Essences might be compared to the great uplifted Consciousness of the Human Race. In the latter, Forms are seen in the inner Light, which certainly to the momentary indi- vidual apprehension seem eternal, unchangeable centres of immense life and activity, mountainous in grandeur, though possibly, like the mountains, really in slow flux and change : great gods, who on their inner side are Wisdom and Justice and Beauty and Courage and Mother-Love, and so forth in essence the same in all races and peoples ; but on their outer side, and with respect to the circum- stances and conditions of their activity, are very various from race to race. And the mortal figures that we see, and the images and idols of the Temples, acquire much of their sanctity from the fact that they are expressions or manifestations or reminiscences of these. But of idols I shall speak in the next chapter. 1 But we must not forget here, what I have hinted more than once before, that race-life is not by any means the only higher order of life to which we have access ; and that in every indi- vidual slumbers even the absolute World-self. But the race- life and consciousness is interesting to us here as forming the key to what we call the Gods and Religion. 161 THE DEVILS AND THE IDOLS BUT some one will say If the Gods are thus real powers and centres of vitality in the human body and in humanity at large, what about the Devils ? What are they ? The reply of course is, They are the same. The devils are very real powers and centres of human energy and vitality. But yet there is a difference ; and the difference may perhaps be broadly defined thus that the Gods are powers making for Life and Harmony, and the Devils are powers making for Discord and Death. There are centres in the human body and mind which make for Corruption : we know that. There are centres of Disease in the body, alien growths which consume and waste its substance ; centres of Disease in the mind, alien and con- suming passions, ungoverned greeds and desires, hatreds, vanities. There are such things as Lust without love, Desire of food and drink without reverence for Health, love of Power without Pity, love of Gain without Charity. Every one sees that here are centres of activity in the human being which in the long-run must lead to Cor- ruption and Disintegration. There are similar 162 The Devils and the Idols centres in society at large and the life of the race. If the higher centres and those which lead to beneficial and harmonious and permanent activi- ties are the foci where the Gods dwell, then these others are the seats of what we call diabolic and demonic agencies. The personification, the glamour, the domina- tion of the latter are as easy to explain as of the former. Take any one of the instances above say the Love of Power. Far back in the history of the race, did the domination of one individual by another (little known among the animals) begin. How many thousands and thousands of times to the ancestors of each of us has the face of some petty tyrant made itself hateful ? how deeply have his cruelties, his meannesses, seared the memory of his features in the heart of his victim ? how intensely may this long line of memories have come down surrounded by a glamour of fear and hatred ? how easy to see that a certain similarity of features and expression in this long line may have given rise to the joint picture of a diabolic figure delighting in cruelty and tyranny a veritable Satan, composite indeed of race-memories, yet lurking terrible in the subconsciousness of every child, and even of the adult man or woman ! Or, to take another example, how many thousands of times to our feminine ancestors may the features of Lust without Love have made themselves fearful and terrible? and how easily out of the combined memory of these may the likeness arise of a devil 163 The Art of Creation of Lust and Sensuality, haunting certain centres of imagination and association in the brain ! And so on. But there is another side too to the question. Not only do we all bear in our heredity the remembrance of countless tyranny suffered, and the vague image of a devil corresponding, whom we hate ; but we also and similarly bear the remembrance of tyranny inflicted on others, and the pleasure accompanying (from immemorial time) such exercise of power. Over and over again the lower human and animal nature within our countless ancestors has rejoiced in its sense of power accompanying some cruel and tyrannous action, till at last such actions have been invested with a sort of glamour, and the temptation to tyrannise (actually to inflict pain) may come down to us with an attraction otherwise hard to explain. Or change the wording of the above, and for Tyranny read Selfishness, Greed, Lust, and so forth, and we see that the argument is the same. The Greed that we hate in others with a com- posite hatred has a fatal and complex hold on ourselves ; and the devil-figure whom at one moment we detest, at another moment exercises over us a strange and lurid fascination, pushing us on to the very deeds we abhor. The strange psychology of passion is difficult to understand in any other way the inordinate enchantment which surrounds the pleasures of the Senses, so disproportionate to the actual en- joyment experienced ; the mania to which it may 164 The Devils and the Idols rise of Drink, or Greed, or whatever it may be ; the sense (so frequent) of a diabolic power impelling one ; the abhorrence, even while they are being perpetrated, of the actions which we call our own. All this seems only explicable by the fact that we bear in our bodies the experience and memory of countless beings, who, having witnessed or embodied the same action from opposite sides^ transmit to us on one side an intense and reduplicated magnetism in its favour, and on the other side a multiplied hatred of it ; and from both sides the sense of a sinister Agency at work within. The strife between human beings in the past, and arising out of the life of the senses, is re-enacted, in miniature and in memory, within our own breasts ; there the reconciliation waits to be worked out, and the strange Justice of Nature to be fulfilled ! But it is obvious that where such conditions exist, and the sense of the diabolic is present, we are dealing with centres which contain the elements of strife and dis- integration within themselves, and which are therefore leading towards Corruption, Insanity, and Death. But it will be asked, If the devils represent centres of corruption, how can they be related or assimilated to the gods, who are the expression and embodiment of great formative Ideas ? The answer is, Simply enough, because the devils also represent formative ideas, but ideas of a lower grade, which necessarily in time have to be super- seded. These particular centres of activity, in fact, 165 The Art of Creation in the human race, and human body, have not always been centres of corruption or degeneration quite the reverse though there are various ways in which they may have become so. Origi- nally perfectly natural and healthy (like all the animal instincts, say), and therefore carrying the sense of pleasure and goodness with them, yet any one of them may in course of time become disproportionately developed, and lapse into con- flict therefore with the rest of the nature ; or it may, as it grows, develop seeds of strife within itself ; or, as Humanity grows and changes and adjusts itself round other centres, the centre in question may have to be readjusted or broken up. In any of these cases the sense of evil will be developed in connection with it ; and the con- tinuance of the centre in its particular course will involve the threat of corruption and death to the race or the individual. Thus the Agencies or Personalities which are associated with these centres take on a maleficent aspect. They may not have worn this always. They may have been Angels and Gods (and the power and fascination that they exercise is mainly due to the long far- back and beneficent root-activity of the ideas which they represent in the human race) ; but now they are become falling Angels, dethroned Gods, Lucifers with a lurid light upon them ; and the pleasures and activities associated with them have become delusive pleasures, insane and fruitless activities, stricken and made barren by the pain and suffering of others who are involved; 1 66 The Devils and the Idols they stand for Motives which are being ejected from the bosom of Humanity. To this class belong a vast number of material and animal pleasures and satisfactions. What joy remains in the mere acquisition or spending of Wealth when the inevitable suffering of those from whom it is wrung begins to be realised ? or what in ambition or domination or selfish grati- fication when the others who represent the reverse of the shield are considered and cared for ? Not that the ideas of Wealth, or Praise, or Power, or Passion, may not in essence be perfectly good and useful, but the special forms which they have hitherto worn have proved unworthy, and are being superseded or modified. The root-ideas are changing their aspect. It is needless to recall in detail the fact that the gods of one age or race become the devils of another. It falls naturally into place here. With Christianity, as we have seen, the human mind grouped itself round other centres of inte- rest and activity than in the old paganism. A tremendous revolution, in fact, in humanity was taking place, and the physiological equipoise was tending towards a denial of the more animal and natural centres in favour of the more spiritual and ascetic. The pagan centres of life became decadent, the pagan gods were changed into devils. Apollo became Apollyon ; Aphrodite (or Venus), the stately goddess of Love, Queen of the world and rewarder of heroes and warriors, became a mere demon and enchantress ; and Pan, 167 The Art of Creation that wonderful impersonation of animal Nature, wore his horns and goat's-hooves now in the character of Satan ! But similar revolutions had taken place before ; and as the gods of Chris- tianity were now driving out the gods of Olympus, so had these in their time driven out Cronos and Rhea and their crew ; and these again had disenthroned the primitive deities Uranus and Gaea strange far-back records of the growing life of the races within whose bosoms these gods dwelt ! The hatred felt by one race for the gods of another and neighboring race is a thing of the same kind. It is almost a physiological hatred ; and it indicates the great constitutional gulfs and differences of habit and life which separate the races. Baal and Ashtoreth were very respectable deities among the Phoenicians, and no doubt were at one period the emblems and expressions of their best life ; but for the Israelites they were simply devils. I am not sure that the Saints of the Catholic Church are not by some Noncon- formist sects looked at in the same light ; and it is obvious that the great division of Europe into Catholic and Protestant and Greek Church is not so much a matter of intellectual Tightness or wrongness of view, as of a difference of in- stinctive heredity, and a distinction of race-feeling between Latin and Teuton and Slav. From the same point of view, the way in which the race- gods figure in all race-conflicts, and the im- mense importance ascribed to them and their 1 68 The Devils and the Idols prevailment over the enemy, is a matter very easily intelligible. But to return to our devils. As I have said, the devils are gods which have gone astray Powers or Forms which, once helpful and con- structive in the human organism, have now be- come maleficent and destructive. Perhaps in the most primitive races it is not always easy to dis- tinguish gods from devils. The instinct of self- preservation, for instance, is one of the earliest and most powerful instincts in animal and human life. It is largely represented in the lowest savages by Fear. Fear rules in this centre of self-preserva- tion. Everything that can possibly harm the man is dreaded and avoided ; mental ingenuity is taxed to discover what may be possibly harmful. Fear is thus good, and a necessary condition of animal life and primitive human preservation. But it is also bad and destructive, and the more advanced the creature becomes, the more so. For as soon as the human brain becomes sufficiently developed to be capable of consciously entertaining within itself the images of Fear /. Co. Edinburgh &* London Works by Edward Carpenter TOWARDS DEMOCRACY : Complete Poems, Edition 1896. One vol., cloth, gilt, pp. 367. 35. 6d. net. WHO SHALL COMMAND THE HEART. Being Part IV. of "Towards Democracy." One vol., pp. 150, cloth, gilt edge. 2s. net. (1902.) ENGLAND'S IDEAL, and other Papers on Social Subjects. Fourth Edition, 1902, pp. 176. Cloth, 2s. 6d. ; paper, is. CIVILISATION : Its Cause and Cure. Essays on Modern Science, &c. Seventh Edition, 1902, pp. 156. Cloth, 2s. 6d. ; paper, is. LOVE'S COMING OF AGE : A series of Papers on the Relations of the Sexes. Fourth Edition, 1903, pp. 168, cloth, 35. 6d. net. ANGELS' WINGS : Essays on Art and Life. With Nine Full-page Plates. Cloth gilt, pp. 248. 6s. ADAM'S PEAK TO ELEPHANTA : Sketches in Ceylon and India. New Edition, 1903, cloth gilt, 45. 6d. THE STORY OF EROS AND PSYCHE, with First Book of Homer's Iliad done into English, and Frontispiece, cloth gilt, 2s. 6d. IOLAUS : An Anthology of Friendship. Printed in red and black inks, with Ornamental Initials and Side Notes. Cloth, gilt edge. 2s. 6d. net. CHANTS OF LABOUR : A Songbook for the People. Edited by EDWARD CARPENTER. With Frontispiece and Cover by WALTER CRANE. Paper, is. EDWARD CARPENTER: The Man and His Message. Pamphlet by TOM SWAN, with Two Portraits and Copious Extracts from above works. Price 6d. fti)>- G e OR.G g > -71 [u_L n. University of California SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed. A 000 676 670 3