■'<*«: 3* Montana, University A brief account of the third anniversary exercises* A BRIEF flceeaNT er the THIRD ANNIVERSARY EXERCISES THE -^.^; J^ontana UniueF|ily At University Place, HELENA, MONTANA. Ju^e lM4feh, '18§3. [ith full Report of the University Sermon by Rev. F. E. Brush, D. D. and the University Oration by Hon. W. F. ; Sanders, and the Oration before the Pullman Literary Society by Lieutenant Governor A. C. l^olkin. Publi5l7 # A BRIEF AeeeyNT of the THIRD ANNIVERSARY EXERCISES H^ OF THE -^ J^onlana UniueF^ity At University Place, HELENA, MONTANA. With full Report of the University Sermon by Rev. F. E. Brush, D. D. and the University Oration by Hon. W. F. Sanders, and the Oration before the Pullman Literary Society by Lieutenant Governor A. C. Botkin. Pubiisl^^d by Ord(^r of t\)e Board of Trustees. 18!I3. State Publishing Company. helena, montana, BRIEF SUMMARY — OF THE — -OF — The ninth and tenth of June were devoted to closing exami- nations for the year and decorations for the coming anniversary exercises to begin the nth. The boys and girls deserve great commendation for the public spirit displayed in sharing cheerfully the work incident to such an occasion. Indeed, it showed that the faculty had not omitted this one essential point in the education of their students, viz.; to promote the feeling of common responsibility and a willing- ness to share cheerfully duties of a public nature. No teacher can afford to ignore the opportunity to impress concreetly lessons of a vital social nature, which such occasions bring. The rooms were tastefully and beautifully decorated, but to those who chanced to look in occasionally on the busy workers and were able to understand something of the spirit, good will, and co-operation that brought this about, its beauty had a deeper meaning than the mere spectacular. To such, it was an ex- ponent of system, organization, sympathy with public works, and an index of latent patriotism. On Sunday morning at ii o'clock. Presiding Elder F. E. Brush A. M., preached the University Sermon, Pres't Tower and Rev. S. E. Snider assisting in the services. An excellent audience of students, neighboring friends from the city and country listened eagerly to this most excellent discourse, which may be found on page 7. 272380 In the afternoon at 4 o'clock Rev. Wm. G. Shoppe, pastor of the Congregation il Church of Helena, preached the sermon be- fore the University Y. P. S. C. E., Text, John III., 16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever beheveth on him might not perish, but have ever- lasting Hfe." It was a most excellent and learned gospel ser- mon. He traced the relationship between God and His chil- dren logically and clearly, and showed that we fiod God's re- flected image in man's attributes We yield God service in serving our fellowman. We can know God only to the extent that we cultivate and possess His attributes. The evening was given to a social-religious meeting under the auspices ot the University Y. P. S, C. E, The Epworth League of St. Paul's Church chartered the big car and about seventy-five of the E. L's, and members of kindred societies of the neighboring churches came and joined services with the school. The meeting was led by E. L. Mills, Pres't of the Uni- versity Y. P. S. C. E. The subject was "Our Young Lives for Christ." It was a good meeting, well filled with songs and counsels and testimonies and prayers and good resolu- tions. When young men and women thus band themselves to- gether and make their common ideal of life the highest, then the future is full of possibilities and life is full of meaning. On Monday evening, Lieutenant Governor Botkin delivered the address before the PuLman Literary Society. His subject was "The Unwritten Law." It is faint praise to say that it was a masterful effort. Deep, philosophical, yet so popular that he held the closest attention of the entire audience throughout the hour. See page 16. The school audience was reinforced by two car loads of city friends. After the lecture the society and friends repaired to the din- ing hall for the first annual banquet of the society. From the standpoint of toothsome viands and savory toasts, it was a suc- cess. Good taste, good cheer and good wit seemed to radiate from every table and beam from every face. On Tuesday occurred the annual meeting of the Board of Trustees. A very acceptable report of the current running ex- penses was made by Pres't Tower and plans were set on foot for canceling the old debt. Prof, Abbott's resignation was ac- cepted and a hearty testimonial of the Professor's scholarship and ch racter given by unanimous vote of the Board. Prof. Ryder, previously in the school, but who has spent the past year at Chicago University, was elected to the chair of Ancient Lan- guages, vice Prof. Abbott. In the afternoon of Tuesday, Prof. Nunvar, who has charge of the musical department of the school, gave a most excellent concert. He was assisted by Miss Bessie Stevens who has giv- en vocal lessons in the school during the year. The evening was devoted to the prize declamation contest. Five girls and six boys, elected by their mates, were the com- petitors. A first and second prize were offered to the girls and boys respectively, the girls competing with each other, and the boys with each other. A crowded house greeted the young contestants Reverends Brush, Shoppe and Holmes were ap- pointed judges. The programme was as follows: — MUSIC— 1. Edward L. Mills, Bozeman Lafayette 2. Ina Craven, Philbrook Mona's Water 3. Carl B. Hard, University Place Foe's Raven 4. Rose Gowin, Bozeman The Bridal Feast — MUSIC — 5. C. N. Davidson, Anaconda Death of Garfield fj. Marg.ry Jacoby, Highwood Mary, Queen of Scots. 7. W. D. Tipton, W. S. Springs Speech of Patrick Henry. 8. Laura E. Fitch, Sheridan The Ringing ol the Bell. — MI'SIC— 9. n. C.Chambers, University Place Burning of Chicago. 10. Hattie E. Dickinson, Missoula The Stag* Kide. IL Philo. W. Haynes, Miles City Declaration of IndependiMice. —MUSIC — Congratulations were earned by all. It was conceded to be the best contest in the history of the school. On Wednesday morning at eleven o'clock. President Tower opened the last session of exercises by calling on Rev. Bell, of Helena, to lead in prayer. Hon. W. F. Sanders, Pres't of the Board of Trustees, then delivered the University oration to a crowded house. It was an effort of which the Senator himself might well be proud. We trust that every reader of this paper will read this oration carefully. It may be. found on page 32. Mrs. Monroe and Miss Stevens then favored us with vocal solos. Dr. Tower then announced the prizes as follows: For the highest scholarship and deportment, a saddle pony presented by Mr. James R. Johnson to Miss Margery Jacoby of High- wood. Her grade was 96 per ceiit. Miss Ida Fryett took sec- ond rank with a grade of 95 7-15 per cent and Miss fna Craven took third rank a grade of 94 25-32 per cent. The $25 cash prize offered by Elder Jacob Mills for the best English Composition was awarded to Edward L. Mills for an essay on "The Ethics of Politics." Carl B. Hard and Miss Margery Jacoby receiving honorable mention. There were six contestants. Mr. Hard's essay was a poem of considerable merit and promise; subject, "Man, A Vision." Miss Jacoby wrote on "The Greeks." For the best declamation Mr. Haynes took first prize for the boys and Miss Dickinson for the girls. Mr. Tipton received second prize for the boys and Miss Fitch for the girls. The company then repaired to the dining hall for refresh- ments which very interesting exercise was concluded by toasts and a general social. Among the guests of the institution during the week were Elder and Mrs. Mills of Bozeman whose son Edward has been with us for two years past, Mrs. Gaddis, of Fort Logan, whose two children, Charley and Lida, have been in school all the year, Revr Holmes, of Butte, Rev. G. D. King of I>ozeman, Rev. W. W. Van Orsdel of Great Falls, Miss Foster of Omaha and Rev. Wilder Nutting of Townsend. The new electric car Hne added greatly to the occasion. It is safe to say that the outlook for the school is brighter than ever before. University Sermon BY REV. F. "E. BRUSH, D. D. DELIVERED SUNDAY. JUNE 11,1893. "L)-|-/-^xT ^ /— . J ^^ "Iron Sharpeneth Iron; so a Man Sharp- ■■^^^*^» /'/" eneth the Countenance of his Friend." We have here a striking and pecuhar phrasing of a vital truth. This truth is that a certain precious culture results to man from the contact and collision of soul with soul. As 'iron sharpeneth iron,' to use the picturesque putting of the Proverb writer, so mind sharpens mind, soul polishes soul, spirit perfects spirit in that wonderful experience which we call human inter- course. This, as it seems to me, is the thought of the sacred writer; one stimulates the other , poHshes himself by mutual spi- ritual intercourse and friction with his fellow, and each contributes by such an interchange of personal peculiarities to the spiritual development of both? The thought may be still further drawn out, 'A man by himself is no man; he is dull, he is very blunt; but if his fellow come and quicken him by his presence, speech and example, he is much more comfortable, skilful and better than he was when he was alone.' In a sense that is very broad and indeed universal, 'it is not good for man to be alone.* In a state of isolation man vegetates, withers and decays. It is only through intimate association with his kind that he comes to the finest flower of his culture and to the divinest perfecting of his nature. The Bible has a wonderful way of laying hold of the most vitalizing and masterful energies of human culture and impressing them into the service of reli- gion for the consummation of man. So, too, there is not a force in the natural world freighted with blessing to man which may not be utiHzed for supreme spiritual weal. Thus it is in this 8 particular realm. This principle of the friction of man upon man, which yields largest and richest results in all the lower domains of human endeavor, is employed to secure the divinest issues in the shaping, refining, burnishing and crowning of spiritual character. Before following this principle into the spiritual sphere, let us note some of its applications upon lower planes. And, first, let us witness its operation on the field of men- tal training. It is the severe and ceaseless rubbing of mind against mind which imparts strength, hardness, brilliancy to the mental powers. One class of minds realize this in communion with God in nature. They see the Infinite Mind disclosed in the material universe and, through collision of their finite mind with His, thought^becomes quickened and opulent, spirit aspires, the whole being is lifted up and illumined. So Kepler pauses in his scientific scrutiny of the heavens and in spiritual ecstasy exclaims with loftiest emotion, 'O God, I think thy thoughts after thee.' The poet Wordsworth beautifully describes the "consecrating effects of early dawn," in verse that mirrors the feelings of his own,soui. What soul was his when from the naked top Of some bold head-land he beheld the Sun Rise up and bathe the world in light. He looked — Ocean and earth, the solid frapie of earth And ocean's liquid mass, beneath him lay In gladness and deep joy. The clouds were touched. And in their silent faces did he read Unutterable love. Sound needed none, Nor any voice of joy; his spirit drank The spectacle; sensation, soul and form All melted into him. They swallowed up His animal being. In them did he live. And by them did he live; they were his life. In such access of mind, in such high hour Of visitation from the living God. Thought was not; in enjoyment it expired; No thanks he breatheJ, he proffered no request; Rapt into still communion that transcends The imperfect offices of pra3'er and praise, His mind was a thanksgiving to the power That made him; it was blessedness and love." Thus it was with a dear friend of mine who, coming out upon Inspiration Point in the Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone, fell upon her knees and wept and worshipped when confronted with the majesty and beauty of God's thought as materially expressed in the towering, many colored walls of that magnificent nature- temple. So it is as we come into vital touch with God's mind in material manifestation. The contact deepens, broadens, en- riches our mental energies, elevates and enlarges the heart, fills the spirit with a vision whose rare and wondrous beauty trans- forms the whole being and exalts it to perfect unison with the Divine. Another class of minds will realize this mental sharp- ening in the silent library through solitary and absorbed study of the great masters of thought. Robertson, of Brighton, one of the brightest, strongest, most suggestive and fertilizing English preachers of this century, used to speak, of 'lighting his torch at another man's fire.' • He meant that the friction of other minds against his own caused a mental glow, that brightened and in- tensified into a flaming splendor all his own. There are thinkers who act as an electric stimulus upon our mental organism mak- ing it coruscate and burn. In my own personal reading I find it extremely difficult to finish one of Emerson's essays. Here some thought grips my mind and carries it far afield; there another thought wakens slumbering fancies of my own, strikes them into fire and away they soar into the empyrean. So it is that Emerson, Carlyle and Ruskin, through their inspirational power, have quickened and fecundated our best, sanest and most influential modern thought. This is the peculiar and pre- eminent power of the Bible. It is surcharged with a vivid, rushing, flaming life, that vitalizes and impassionates all who receive its impact. Unchain the Bible and discharge its full energy upon the mind and heart of the humble monk of Erfurt historically and you have Luther and the Reformation. Liber- ate this Book and let it operate according to the scientific law of the 'survival of the fittest' and you find it demonstrated that this Word of God has ever awakened and cultured the mental and moral life of the most civilized, progressive and commanding nations on the face of the earth. The skeptical cant about the lO cramping influence of the Bible upon human thought is the most arrant nonsense and woeful humbuggery ever perpetrated upon a patient. and suffering world. The Bible — it is the book of high vision, of masterful and invigorating thought and mind-com- pelling power; it is the constant companion and unceasing in- spiration of the world's greatest and noblest thinkers. Where the Bible is enthroned you will infallibly find freedom and power of mental movement, moral purity and genuine progress. But for ordinary people this sharpening of nature is best realized, perhaps, through contact with living, embodied per- sonahties of genius and power. These God-gifted persons are instinct with vitality, throbbing and thrilling with electric influ- ence, and those who touch them feel the inflow of the mystic tire and are awakened to abounding and victorious life. It is this power that creates and qualifies the great teachers of the ivorld. Education means the drawing out, the stimulating, of the latent powers of the soul, and the moulding of the life to divine ideals. Education is not the cramming of facts and laws into a pupil's mind; it is begetting and fostering the impulse to intellectual activity; it is teaching the proper use of the mental faculties; it is the placing of life on the spiritual plane. So, our teachers must not be wooden and mechanical; they must be vital and inspirational. President Garfield made a wise and true remark when he said that the best university for him would be a log with Mark Hop- kins on one end and the student at the other. I think the best college work is often done in our smaller institutions where the faculty is of Hmited number, where the appliances may be meager, but where the teachers are men and women of power to arouse and fertilize the mental and spiritual lite of the students. There is hardly another educational institution in this country that has "turned" out in proportion to the number of students so many leading and influential men in the pulpit, in the press, in statesmanship, in scientific research as our own Wesleyan Uni- versity, at Middletown, Connecticut. With a small corps of in- structors, a brief roster of students, limited library and appar- atus, as compared with many other colleges and universities, it II has accomplished magnificent and unsurpassed work in the train- ing of great men. I explain this phenomenon thus: the students were not given over to the care of tutors young and inexperi- enced, but were brought into closest and most fruitful contact with teachers of pre-eminent ability, stimulating brain power, and morally moulding energy. The best work is done in German universities to-day in the informal meetings which the professors hold with a few students specially interested in their particular line of work. The alert and eager student there comes into kindling touch with the vast learning, lorty ideals, personal power of the professor and thereby receives a stimulus which he justly counts one of the highest benefits of his whole university career. Out of the rubbing of mind upon mind will ever come light and power. This great principle operates also in the field of business en- terprise. The sovereigns of the commercial world are found in the great cities, not only because there are offered amplest spheres for the most universal and commanding genius, but also, and more largely, because the rubbing of mind upon mind in the great concourse of bright and progressive men centered in the city, sharpens the wits, quickens the intelligence, broadens and clarifies the vision, yields scope and courage for mammoth undertakings. But it seems to me that this principle finds supreme illustration in the spiritual sphere. The incarnation is the largest concrete picturing of this truth. "In human form Jesus Christ, the wis- dom of God, the power of God, the love of God, came close to sinful men without awing or alarming them; and when they touched Him grace flowed from His lips and life to bless them." It is the touch of Christ upon our souls that raises them from the death of sin, that quickens them into life and makes them bur- geon and bloom in beautv- His thoughts dominate ours. His ideals allure us and quench in their full-orbed splendor our dim and earth-born ones; the majesty of His moral might subdue us. So in lesser measure is it in our contact with Christ-filled human souls. We often speak of the "means of grace," and we usu- 12 ally refer to the Bible and its study, the church and its various services and ministries, and kindred matters. We need to rea- Hze that, of all the practical "means of grace," among the mightiest are people and our association with them. In spiritual commingling with living souls, as one has said, "we are impressed, wrought upon and influenced. Indeed, we receive the larger portion of our divine gifts through human hearts and lives. We sometimes overlook this and think of God as reaching down His mercies to us directly and imn:ediately without the interven- tion of mediators, but closer thought shows us that ordinarily this is not the way our spiritual good things come to us. Ordi- narily God passes His gifts to us through others." So it is that another's faith strengthens mine, anothers love fans mine into intenser glow. "We learn many of our best lessons from our associations with our fellowmen." It is truth incarnated and illumined in life that most powerfully sways us. "Every frag- ment of moral beauty in a regenerated life is a mirroring of a little fragment, at least, of the image of God on which our eyes may gaze." Every Christ-charged life is a battery of regener- ating power, a fountain of holy influences, a school of spiritual instruction. History, sacred and secular, is crowded with illus- trative instances. Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Ehsha, Christ and The Twelve will at once suggest themselves as cases illuminating the principle before us. Aside from special divine endowment who shall say how much of the success of the lesser men is due in each instance to their close association with the Masters, receiving thereby nobler ideals, spiritualized ambitions, broadened natures, enriched experiences, hightened qualification for abounding and epochal work. We may find further illustration m our own day and nearer home m the interesting relations of David Livingstone and Henry M. Stanley. You know the story. The great hearted missionary was lost in the mazes of the "dark continent." Long time elapsed without any tidings reaching the civilized world from the grand old hero. At last, as a piece of mere busi- ness enterprise, Stanley is commissed by two great newspapers to proceed to Africa and find Living-stone. American pluck. 13 daring and wit succeed. The brave and saintly soul, who has been followed by the prayers and sympathies of universal Christendom and whose supposed loss has caused sincere and widespread grief, is found. When Stanley came into the pres- ence of that reverend and splendid man who was lovingly lavish- ing his affluent and gifted nature upon the ignorant and imbruted denizens of darkest Africa, it was to be expected that a deep and abiding impression would be made upon the ardent spirit of the younger man. This is what the young, ambitious, worldly, "rustling" newspaper man thought of that magnificent old Christian hero; "His religion is not of the theoretical kind, but is a constant, earnest, sincere practice. For four nronths and four days I lived with him in the same house, or in the same boat or in the same tent, and I never found a fault in him. Each day's life with him added to my admiration of him." This in- timate association with Livingstone in the experiences of com- monplace, every day life wielded a spiritual mfiuence that the keen, shrewd man of the world could not blink or evade, and made Henry M. Stanley a disciple of Jesus Christ. The m- estimable value of his life and its marvelous services in enlight- ening and liberating the dark and manacled continent must be credited to the regenerating and inspirational influence of the Christ in Livingstone. Mark Guy Pearse, the distinguished Wesleyan preacher of London, gives a touching illustration of the power of people as a "means of grace" in an experience garnered when he was a student. I will present it in his own words: "When I was a student our grand old professor of theology was a man for whom we had a great veneration — simple, child- like, holy — none had ever known him to be anythmg else, and that gracious and unfailing sweetness and beauty were to us his natural disposition. To such a man it was no trouble to be always blameless. But one day it chanced that a student came in late to the class, and pushed his way to the seat. The pro- fessor stopped to ask gently why he was late. The answer was given somewhat flippantly, an excuse that aggravated the offense. Instantly the professor, who had been sitting, rose up to his full height, until the big, massive man seemed to fill the room, stretching out a trembling and terrible forefinger at the offender. The great shaggy eyebrows were lifted, and the lightnings shot from his eyes. Like thunder rolled the words from his lips: 'Leave the room, sir.' We started in amazement almost in fright. The culprit crouched away from his place and left, while that majestic figure stood there all ablaze with wrath. The door was shut. Then again the professor sat in his chair. But the storm was done. With a trembling voice he read the discourse, seeming almost unable to go on. After the lecture we left only to gather in groups and discuss this wonderful thing. Presently came a message that the offender was wanted; and be hastened to the irate professor, expecting an angr}' repri-. mand. Hut there sat the old man in tears. 'My brother.' he sobbed, 'will you forgive me?' *No, sir; indeed, it is I who should apologize,' said the student overwhelmed. 'No, no, I am older. Will you forgive me? I am very, very sorry Say that you forgive me ' The student managed to get out a word or two. 'And you must tell all the students that I have apologized, will you.?' And again there was a pause for the promise. ♦Now,' said the noble old man, 'I will go and ask God to for- give me.' Nothing in all that life, -fiothing in all his words, ever did us so much good as that. We knew then under that gentleness and beauty what fires buined; and every man of us had a new faith and a new hope and a new love." Thus it is with all human experience. Highest, holiest truth comes to us most vividly, contagiously and transformingly through the supreme object-lesson of incarnation. Be it ours, teachers, students, friends, to incarnate the Ideal Man so that our lives in loving friction shall "sharpen" to finer issues and spiritulize into diviner beauty the countenances of the friends we fondly cherish; and thus shall the universal human life be lifted more fully fnto the light and keyed more perfectly to the celestial harmonies. 15 In closingj this hour ol spiritual coiiinuiiiitMi I hicathc thr I'lUtu'St prayer thai this golden scntuiuMit may doininati' ami iuspiri' every heart here present: "May every soul that touches mine- lie it the slightest contact — gel therefrom some good. Some liule grace, one kiiull\- thought. One asjiiration yet unfelt, one bit of courage For the darkening sky, one gleam of faith To brave the thickening ills of life, One glimpse of brighter skies beyond the gatlu'ring mists To make this life worth while And heaven a surer heritage." ADDI?E§§ delivered Before the |?allman Literary goeiety, Jane is i86)3, BY LIEUT. GOVERNOR A. C. BOTKIN. Mr. President and Members of the Ptillman Literary Society : Every rock emboweled in the earth has its story to tell of the gradual growth of a shapeless mass of matter into a world of light and beauty. Upon the different strata, as upon the leaves of a book, are written the mighty changes since creation's birth; so the jurisprudence of a country is its best history. It is not so in the sense that regards history as a catalogue of battles and a schedule of dynasties; but in that which looks upon it as a panorama of the successive conditions through which a people move from barbarism to a ripe civilization, and sometimes back- ward to another form of savager3^ When Fletcher of Saltoun said, "Let me make the ballads of a nation and I care not who makes its laws," he uttered a very pretty epigram, but a flagrant fallacy. He might have t^aid that the ballads make the laws, or that the laws make the ballads, but the real truth is that the people make the ballads and the laws. The laws of a nation are the outgrowth of its manners and customs; the unfailing exponent of its virtue, intelligence and advancement. Law cannot be other than a growth. It has never occurred that a code has been tr:insplanted and imposed upon a people by the exercise of human authority. Perhaps the most complete and enduring conquest in history was that of England by the Normans, but the laws of the conquered Saxons survived to be the basis of the jurisprudence that obtains to-day with the Eng- 17 lish family upon three continents. The laws of the American Indians are still observed among the different tribes, and will doubtless continue to be so long as the tribal condition remains. It is conceivable that a strange language might be forced upon a people in the course of a generation or two; but it is not con- ceivable that an entirely new system of jurisprudence could be imposed upon a people by the utmost expedients of tyranny. The laws of a people are simply a form and manifestation of their life, growing with their growth, changing with their changes, but beyond the power of violence or oppression to sunder or replace. After selecting the subject of this address I consulted Pom- eroy's admirable treatise on Municipal Law, and there with a mass of valuable information and suggestion, I found a protest against the term "Unwritten Law." Undoubtedly it is lacking in accuracy, though it has abundant sanction in usage. Much of what we call "The Unwritten Law" is in fact written in the decisions of the courts and the works of writers. Its definitive feature is that it is not embodied in formal statutes. To convey a general idea of its nature, and to illustrate by comparatively recent examples its growth and adjustability to ever changing conditions — behold the purpose of this brief ad- dress. To realize clearly what is "The Unwritten Law," the best course perhaps is to determine what it is not; and to this end it may be desirable to glance hastily at the codes of which men- tion is found in history. The Roman Law of the Twelve Tables is the first to be considered, and it takes us back to a time four and a half centuries before Christ. Previous to that the laws of Rome had consisted of the enactments of the senate and the decisions of popular gatherings. They were not col- lected, and were not even formulated with any degree of pre- cision, and their defects became obvious even at a time when the Roman people were not far removed from primitive condi- tions. In the year 452 B. C , a commission was sent to Greece in the hope of gaining from the maturer civilization of that country the materials for a general system of jurisprudence. Upon their return a decemvirate was constituted and the product of their labors, embodied in twelve articles or titles, came to be known as the Twelve Tables. It is interesting to notice that they dealt with nearly all the subjects of legislation and adjudi- cation that exist to-day, and in addition to these they undertook to prescribe how the child should be reared from his birth, and how the dead should be interred. Some of ^he provisions are very significant of the low state of civilization of which they were the product. A debtor refusing to pay his debt could be taken home by his creditor, where he could be tied by the neck or have irons put on his feet to the weight of fifteen pounds. "If the debtor be insolvent to several creditors let his body be cut in pieces" on the third market day. It may be cut into more or fewer pieces, says the obliging statute; and really it doesn't seem that it could have made any considerable difference to the unfortunate debtor. It is inconceivable that the Twelve Tables should have remained the fixed bod} of Roman law dur- ing the long period that elapsed before they were superseded, and we must assume that they were little more than the trunk upon which frequent amendments were engrafted. For between the work of the decemvirs and that of Justinian, was an interval of nearly one thousand years. During that time Rome had achieved all that is greatest in her marvellous history. She had borne her victorious eagles into many lands, and in in- tellectual achievement had kept step with the tread of her triumphant armies. Through the changing conditions of these ten centuries, that compass the greater part of the history of the republic and the empire, the law of Rome was the Twelve Tables, supplemented by numerous statutes and decrees and by the treatises of the jurisconsults. It was A. D. 528 that the Em- peror Justinian projected the great work that bears his name, perhaps justly in that he conceived and fostered it, though its merit must be attributed to the labors of the lawyer Tribonian. It was a daring project, contemplating nothing less than a uni- versal code of law embodied in a single statutory enactment. This design was successfully carried out. When completed after five years of labor, it presented a collation of the imperial constitutions, a compilation of all the laws enacted during the empire and a digest of all recorded judicial decisions, clearly formulated and logically classified. It can not be regarded at this time without inspiring profound admiration, and yet it was the product of a time when the city that "Sat upon her seven hills And from that throne of beauty ruled the world." was toppling to its fall. It was in the year 533 that the Code of Justinian was com- pleted, and its earliest successor dates 1267 years later. During the first year of the present century the Emperor Napoleon entered upon the task of rescuing the laws of France from chaos and reducing them to an orderly and comprehensive sys- tem. Great learning and painstaking were expended upon the work, and it is in all respects a more enviable monument of the genius of its great projector than the conquest of half the con- tinent. The Code Napoleon was embraced in five volumes, and attempted with fair success to provide for every contingency in the affairs of men that could invoke the application of law. It is still the law of France, and has left a greater or less impress upon the jurisprudence of those countries of Europe whither it was borne with the conquering legions of its author. It was transplanted in Lousiana which was consecutively a Spanish and a French colony, and which, after it became a State of the Am- erican Union, adopted a code which retains all its principal fea- tures. Thus it comes to pass that one of the States of our Ke- public has a legal system that is radically different from those that obtain in the others. Partial codes are common in thi^ country, beginning with that inexcusable specimen of craz3'-quilt legislation, the Revised Statutes of the United States, and extending through all the States. These, aside from their provisions respecting govern- mental functions, are simply legislative enactments of legal principles and deal principally with titles to real property, the distribution of estates and the definitions and punishment of crimes. They do not assume to be exhaustive, and even as to 20 those subjects of which they treat, the unwritten law is liberally drawn upon for the exposition and application of their provis- ions. What I have said may convey some idea of the written law, or of the principal attempts that have been made to formulate the body of the law that existed in the customs of the people, the decisions of courts and scattered and fragmentary enact- ments, and embody them in comprehensive systems of legisla- tion. If I have succeeded in this, I have prepared the way for an understanding of the subject of this address. What I will continue to call for the convenience of the term "The Unwritten Law," in violation of Prof. Pomeroy's protest, embraces the en- tire body of legal rules and principles that do not possess the form and sanction of statutes enacted b}^ legislative authority. It may be stated with confidence that no two law suits ever pre- sented exactly the same features. A court is confronted with a given state of facts, and with the duty thereupon to see that the legal rights of the parties are protected. First it invokes gen- eral principles of law that may have their germ in abstract right, or in the rude customs of the people centuries before. Then it seeks in the decisions of other courts for analogous cases, and applying these as nearly as may be, it pronounces a decision which in turn becomes a precedent to aid later tribunals in deal- ing with like questions. So "The Unwritten Law" is an accre- tion that commenced with the birth of time and reaches to the living present. For its ultimate source we have only to read in the language of inspiration, "There is one Law giver," and to find it in the divinely implanted instinct of right. For the rest it is a growth in which custom and analogy are the active prin- ciples. Our language and our law have both a sturdy Germanic stock The Angles and the Saxons occupied England earl} in the sixth century and dominated the country until the Norman conquest of 1066. During the greater part of this period they were divided into tribes or small kingdoms and had no uniform sys- tem of laws. The different customs of the several counties were administered by the local tribunals, called folk-courts, and 21 survived the union of the government under King Egbert and even the conquest of England by the Normans. One of the local institutions that were preserved performed an important part in the history of our own country. The rule of descent of real property in England is primogeniture, that is, realty passes to the eldest male child. But in the county of Kent a different principle obtains that divides the lands of a decedent equally among his children. When King Charles gave his brother the duke of York the American province that is now the State of New York he inserted in the patent a clause that the pos- sesions were to descend "according to the custom of the county of Kent." This circumstance, which seems to have been little more than accidental, may be said to have saved this country from the principle of primogeniture, and in its remoter conse- quence has been far-reaching beyond conception. With the great facilities for the accumulation of wealth which this country has always afforded, if estates were to descend without division, our people would almost inevitably have succumbed to an aris- tocracy. It was the ownership of the soil in small parcels that made free institutions possible, and the same condition is their chief muniment to-day. If that condition shall ever pass away and be succeeded by landed monopolies, we may be sure that the downfall of popular government and all that is most char- acteristic and precious in our political and social institutions will not be long in following. It seems Hke a trifling incident, the addition of a few words to a royal patent, but it proved to be the pebble that turns the course of a mighty river. Feudalism left a strong impression upon the laws that we in- herited from England. As a social condition we are so widely separated from it in point of time that its grand and rugged out- lines appear to us as dimly defined as an ancient myth; but you cannot to-day read understandingly the deed of a lot in Lockey's Addition to the Helena townsite without recurring to its insti- tutions! The laws that are derived from feudalism represent, as laws ever do, the customs and advancement of the people among whom they existed. The Saxons and Normans who built up 22 the feudal institutions of England to a superstructive of sur- passing splendor, were wailike races with no other standard of honor and power than military service. The only thing that was really treated as property was land. The absolute owner- ship of the soil was vested in the King, and he parcelled out the possession and enjoyment of it in large tracts to favored retainers from whom he exacted in return a certain number of men to serve under his command. By the practice of subinfeudation, the tenants who held immediately from the King divided their lands and let them to inferior tenants receiving in payment the services of armed men; and this process continued until between the sovereign and the wretched being who actually tilled the soil there were several classes or degrees of tenants. Around this system the laws of England were built up. But later, and about the time of the revolution of 1688, commerce and manufactures began to engage a larger share of the attention of the English people, and movables, or what is known to us as personal property arose to importance. Possessions of this character were almost wholly without law to define and protect the rights of owners, as the laws which feudalism had implanted upon titles and tenures of the land were not adapted to movable goods. Precedents and analogies failing to meet the require- ment of rules to deal with the new questions arising, recourse was had to the Institutes of Justinian. Perhaps, however, i^ would be more accurate to say that the commercial intercourse of England with the nations of the continent had introduced certain usages which were recognized among merchants, and that the courts adopted and enforced these usages so that they became a part of the law of England. However this may be, it is clear that the law merchant which we received from Eng- land had its original source in Rome, and is strongly pervaded with the spirit of what is called the civil, in contradistinction to the common law. The grafting of a system borrowed from a foreign soil to control relations and possessions that had newly come into existence is an early and notable illustration of that peculiar excellence of the unwritten law which consists in its unfailing capacity of expansion and assimilation. 23 'I wish now to give one or two turther illustrations of this facility of assimilating new principles or expanding old ones to meet the changes that are inseparably incident to human society. Two of these may be found in the history of the law of waters. The distinction between navigable and non-navigable streams possesses some importance in law for reasons that it would be foreign to our present purpose to recite. The common law of England recognized as navigable only those streams that felt the flow and re-flow of the tides, for the abundant reason that as a matter of fact in that country only such water-courses were ser- viceable for the uses of commerce. When the common law was transplanted in America by the British colonies, it found large inland rivers to which tae tidal influence did not extend, but which were capable of affording passage for vessels of great tonnage. It was monstrous to classify the Hudson, Ohio, Mis- sissippi and Missouri rivers as to their legal status with the brooks of England. In other words, the common law met here a new geographical condition, and it bent itself to correspond. It was not long before the English rule was modified ; and it is now established by a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in a case concerning a river that is not larger than the Jefferson and quite as exempt from the ebb and flow of tides that if a river is capable in its natural state of being used for the purposes of commerce, no matter in what mode the com- merce may be conducted, it is navigable in fact and becomes in law a public water-course and highway. Here was a notable departure, but one wholly consistent with the controlling prin- ciple which was expressed by Judge Sanderson of California in the words: "The common law is a science of perpetual growth." Following the same general subject, we come upon an illustra- tion that is closely associated with the development of the new west of which we are a part. Under the common law the right to the use of the waters of a stream belonged to the owner of its banks. This right can not be lost by non-user, though it is a subject of prescription and might pass by adverse enjoyment for the period fixed by the Statute of Limitations. All the owners of the banks of a stream have a right to use its waters 24 in common, and each is governed in the exercise of the right by the all-pervading principle that one must so use his own prop- erty as not to injure that of another. It followed that waters must be allowed to flow in their natural channel as they were accustomed to flow — ut currere solebat. Such was the law at the time of the discovery of gold on the Pacific coast. Water was an indispensable agent in separating the precious metal from the earth in which it was found. It was equally essential, owing to the climatic conditions of this section, to enable agriculture to perform its function of furnishing food for the gathering multitudes of eager gold seekers. The pio- neers of California found streams of water flowing idly through the public lands. Their diversion to places where they could be used in separating gold from the earth and in the irrigation of arid fields could injure no one, and the very existence of the community depended upon it. It was plainly a violation of law; every man who turned water out of its natural channel was a law-breaker; but it is not to be wondered that this consideration scarcely gave them pause. In the construction of works for mining and irrigation,^large expendiures were necessary, and millions of dollars were soon invested in ditches and flumes for the conveyance of water from its channel to the placers and fields. Should these vast prop- erties be left without the protection of the courts? Every con- sideration of justice and policy gave answer in the negative. The situation was a difficult one; it required that a naked tres- pass should be not only condoned but legalized and entrenched behind the muniments that would afford it the security that the law extends only to absolute rights of prosperty. The common law proved to be equal to the emergency, as it is equal to all emergencies. Said Judge Sanderson, from whom we have already quoted: "The reasons which constitute the ground work of the common law upon this subject remain un- disturbed. The conditions to which we are called upon to apply them are changed, and not the rules themselves." It is not necessary to inquire whether this is strictly true- The learned judge would perhaps have stated the situation more accurately 25 if he had boldly announced that the principles of the common law did not fit the conditions that confronted that commonwealth and that it must extend its hospitality to new principles that those conditions demanded for the furtherance of justice and the well being of society. While the doctrine of the common law was that only the owners of the banks of a stream had a right to the use of its waters, and even they could not divert it from its channels, the courts of the West came to hold that a right to water could be gained without regard to riparian proprietorship by its appro- priation and diversion, priority in time conferring superiority of right. When the question went to the Supreme Court of the United States, it found there Hon. Stephen J. Field, a pioneer of California who had sat upon the Supreme Bench of that State. In giving the decision of the Court, he stated the prin- ciple of the common law, and then proceeded in ihe following language : "This equality of right among all the proprietors on the same stream would have been incompatible with any ex- tended diversion of the water by one proprietor, and its convey- ance for mining purposes to points from which it could not be restored to the stream. But the government being the sole pro- prietor of all the public lands, whether bordering on the streams or otherwise, there was no occasion for the application of the common law doctrine of riparian proprietorship with respect to the waters of those streams. The government by its silent acquiescence, assented to the general occupation of the lands for mining; and, to encourage their free and unlimited use for that purpose reserved such lands as were mineral from sale, and the acquisition of title by settlement. And he who first connects his own labor v^ith thp property thus situated, and open to gen- eral exploration, does, in natural justice, acquire a better right to its use and enjoyment than others who have not given such labor. So the miners on the public lands throughout the Pacific States and Territories by their customs, usages and regulations everywhere recognized the inherent justice of this principle; and the principle itself was at an early period recognized by 26 legislation and enforced by the Courts in those States and Ter- ritories." It is useless to do more than suggest the obvious truth that if our jurisprudence had been embodied in a written code this rad- ical departure from its principles would have been impossible; yet that departure has been prolific of beneticent consequences beyond calculation. It rendered practicable the settlement of this vast section that now affords homes for six millions of human beings, and in its sociological and economic influence may be said to have changed the history of the race. In the year 1829, steam was first applied to transportation on land by George Stephenson with his historic engine, the Rocket. The rapidly increasing use of this invention confronted the law with a new puzzle. How was this later juggernaut that went shrieking through the land to be controlled? It was revolution- izing commerce; it was sure to be a factor in every temporal interest of humanity; but the law knew it not. We have already seen how the unwritten law takes on accre- tions by the principle of analogy. So in this case, courts were not long in determining that a railroad is a road. The vehicles moved upon fixed tracks, and the motive power was steam in- stead of animals; but notwithstanding these differences, a rail- road was simply an improved highway. With this likeness for a basis, the courts have built up the whole system of jurispru- dence governing the construction and operation of these agen- cies of traffic and travel. The analogy was found very useful in assisting the building of railroads. At first they could only secure the right of way for their tracks by purchase from the owners of the property. But this was in some cases only to be effected at extravagant prices, and in some cases could not be done at all. But the doctrine of eminent domain vested in the sovereign authority of a State the right to take private property for a public use, and such a use was the opening of a highway. Thus by the delegation from the State of the right of eminent domain railway com- panies could condemn and appropriate by proceedings provided by statutes, such land as was necessary for the laying of their ^7 tracks; and it is mainly this that made possible the eighty thou- sand miles of railroad that make the map of our continent look like an exaggerated cob-web. In time railroads came to be a mighty power in the land. Their influence over commerce, industry and property was little less than supreme, a fact that was happily characterized by an eloquent orator and profound thinker who spoke of their domi- nation as "the modern feudalism." "It is not surprising that the}-^ exercised their power to their own profit, or that it led to abuse and wrong. The evil grew to be far-reaching and grievous before the people were aroused to the necessity of self-protec- tion. Then they seemed powerless. Railroads were owned by private companies. The State could not dictate to an indi- vidual what he should charge for his services, or how he should conduct his business; how then could it dictate to a private com- pany? It was some time before an answer was discovered, but at length the courts found a reason for doing what justice and public considerations of importance demanded. True, a railway company is a private corporation in the sense that it is an aggre- gation of private persons contributing their private means to a certain enterprise. But such a company exercises by delegation the right of eminent domain, which is an attribute of sovereignty and thereby takes on a quasi public character which subjects it to the control of the State. In this reasoning a sanction was found for the legislation regulating charges and forbidding dis- criminations and other abuses such as the so-called "granger laws" of some of the States and the inter-state commerce law of Congress which is now occupying so large a share of public attention. So the inherent faculty of the unwritten lavv of re- sponding to the demands of new situations, always to the end that justice shall prevail, was again vindicated. The increasing use of short-hand writing has already worked some changes in the machinery through which justice is ad- ministered and may be expected to effect more radical innova- tions upon our jurisprudence. I have myself seen a witness ex- amined and cross-examined upon his bed of sickness from which he could not arise, and his testimony then read to the jury from 28 the stenographer's notes. Of course this could only be done by stipulation; but not many years ago, such a proceeding would have been regarded as a blow at the Constitution of the United States and a clean knock out of Magna Charta. It will be interesting to observe what new principles will claim the hospitality of our jurisprudence in consequence of the gen- eral introduction of typewriters. The use of seals which are still attached to certain classes of instruments is a relic of a time when to be able to write one's name was a rare and rather a despised accomplishment; and now that we are turning over the business of chirography to a machine, perhaps we will recur to primitive expedients and makea seal serve all the purposes of a signature Another field of conjecture is opened as to what changes in our jurisprudence may ensue from the invention of the telephone. Marriages by telephone have so far been only the creations of newspaper paragraphers, and it is doubtful whether they will ever become popular; but it is safe to predict that the facilities for conveying human speech for long distances will in time make its impress upon English and American juris- prudence. It is thus that the unwritten law expands and adjusts itself to each changing phase in the progress of mankind. If we were to look upon it as an immense volume, we will find a liberal space on every page upon which there may be written without end new principles as time moves on in the performance of its appointed task. The relative merits of written and unwritten law — of the law that is in the form of direct statutory enactment and that which is built up by judicial decisions — have been often discussed, and the question is now confronting us in consequence of the preparation of a general code for submission to our Legislative Assembly. It is urged in support of this measure that there should be a clear, precise and authoritative formulation of the law of the land that will enable every citizen of ordinary intelligence to as- certain, each for himself, what are his rights, duties, and responsi- bilities. Thus when he enters into new relations, he may know in advance vvhat they imply and will not be left until difficulties have arisen and then be required to seek the aid of lawyers and 29 the courts. The unwritten law, it is claimed, is of necessity vague, indefinite and elusive, and it is only in a code that cer- tainty and precision can be attained. There would be a good deal of force in these considerations if human progress were at an end. In the nature of things a code can only provide for conditions and relations existing at the time of its creation; it can not anticipate all the incalculable possibilities of the future. Thus the feasability of a code must depend upon a state of society differing little from absolute stag- nation. While there is a leaven of unrest in the race; while thought and aspiration are contriving successive changes in the circumstances and activities of mankind — so long a fixed and inflexible system of jurisprudence must be inndequate and an obstruction to advancement. A statute so comprehensive and perfect in all respects as to obviate the necessity for courts is, humanly speaking, an im- possibility. So far as codes have been tried, they have not diminished litigation; they have rather increased it. When laws have been passed to take the place of the unwritten law upon a given subject, courts have quite commonly found more to do in interpreting the language of the act than they would have had in deciding the cases if no such act had been in existence. The code which it is now sought to adopt in New York was adopted some years ago in California; and Prof. Pomeroy after an extensive experience of its operation, speaks as follows: "The Civil Code of California, among all other instances of similar legislation, pre-eminently needs judicial interpretation. There is hardly a section, whether it imbodies only a definition or whether it contains the utterance of some broad principle, or some general doctrine, of some single special rule, wnich he does not require to be judicially interpreted in order to ascertain with certainty its full meaning and effect. Upon this great work of construction and interpretation, the Supreme Court has, in reality, but just entered. "Our Civil Code, regarded as a comprehensive system of statu- tory legislation, covering the entire private jurisprudence^ of the State, as a scientific or practical arrangement and statement of 30 the principles, doctrines, and rules constituting that jurispru- dence — in other words, as an example of true codification — is, even in the estimation of its original authors, full of defects, im- perfections, omissions, and even inconsistencies, which must, so far as possible, be supplied, removed, and harmonized by the courts, for it be useless to expect any real aid from the Legis- lature." The Code of Procedure which was adopted in New York in 1848, and is now substantially in force in most of the States, was in reality a reform, because the old common law forms of plead- ing were so artificial and intricate that Justice was often smoth- ered in the folds of her own garments. Nevertheless it is found that while the decisions of the courts of that State on questions of practice from the organization of the State government to 1848, would only fill twelve volumes, the reports on that class of questions now number 130 volumes. Clearly it is not yet demonstrated that codes can be made to serve the very desirable end ot decreasing litigation. And this brings us to a difference between the two systems of law that possesses grave importance. When a court is called upon to determine the rights of parties under a given state of facts as to a matter that is governed by a statute, its labors must be directed to deciding the meaning of the statute which may be more or less clearly and accurately set forth in words. In the absence of a statute, the court has only to look at the gen- eral principals of justice by the guiding fights of precedent and analogy. In the one case it is a question of the meaning of words; in the other a question of what morality and good con- science would dictate. In the one case the determination may depend upon the omission of a comma; in the other, it will con- form to the eternal principles of right. But probably the chief superiority of unwritten over codified law is that faciUty of expansion and adaptation which 1 have sought to illustrate by a few examples. A statute may be amended or repealed by the power that enacted it, and that can onl) be done by another statute, which must also be general and inflexible. It is not in the nature of a legislative enactment to 3^ be susceptible of these nice adjustments to such particular case that is realized by the common law. In deciding a particular case judges do not formulate a general rule; they only deter- mine the rights of the parties under the peculiar circumstances of that case. In so doing they make a precedent which would be, in a degree, binding upon other judges if exactly the same question were to arise again, which, however, is scarcely sup- posable; but from the body of these precedents comes that stability which can be secured without the sacrifice of flexibility. So, as far as possible with finite beings, abstract justice is ap- plied to conciete conditions. The recurrence to these fundamen- tal and universal ordinances of justice and morality is so constant and so characteristic that it has been said with force that the Christian religion is a part of the common law. As the interests and activities of men grow and multiply, new relations are created, and new questions arise. A statutory jurisprudence is worse than helpless to deal with these; but the unwritten law responds unfailingly from sources that are as in- exhaustible as God and Truth. The germ of vegetable exis- tence sending its roots downward, spreading its branches up- ward, expanding its leaves to the sun, putting forth bud and blossom to attract the insect to carry upon its tiny feet the pollen dust that shall germinate new growths is not more noiseless, harmonious and beautiful than the symmetrical up-building of that system of jurisprudence which recognizes the precept of inspiration, "The letter killeth, but the spirit maketh alive." The imagination fails to compass the future of the race. We can only recognize the certainty that it will involve ceaseless chanofes and diversifications in all social, commercial and indus- trial interests, activities and relations. Throughout all these, the law must be a present, pervadmg and potent factor. But this cannot be the cold letter of statutes or the rigid formulas of codes. It is only the free spirit of the law "whose seat is the bosom of God; whose voice is the harmony of the world." 1-;Y MON. W F. SANDERS. /]//. /'/rsi(/i-i//, /.(/(//cs (H/i/ (ifiilh-nu'iio/ I lie luniiii o/ '/dusters, llic luntiltw (iiui llii- ruj^ih ami /\i/)i>iis o/ llw Monlann Uni- versity: All impulse mikI si-iisi' ;^allu'i loicc and rclint'iiu'nl fiom md'o- spci lion, Irotii lioiMs si'l apart lor coiihiiiplalion, foi' patii-iit i c- vii'W ol tlu" pa.sl, for examination ol llic pit'seiil and for |)iojeel- iii^ aciivitii'S for llu' futmc. And fiom this Irnlli arc horn .sacred and anniversary days. Tlicy ar«' marked with red Idlers in hum, III hisloi y. They recall us liom the sordid monotony of Ihou^^hl and atlioii, they inleriu|>t the s iliety and lassitude bc- <;otlen of the tommonplacc and familiar, and lift us into lU'W views and itlalions alike with llu- interior and exterior world. Wc escape for a time from that of which we arc a pait and e.\|)ose all our surroundings u|>on some hill lop where they may he he- holdeii ol all men, hut chielly and most usefully beholden oh- jeitivelN' by ourselves. It is e.s.seiitial from time to lime that theri' shall be ri'trospeiiion and review, that there shall be eiu|uiiy as to oiu" relations vvith other activities ami impulses, that we may conform to tlu- ^riuMal moMMueiil ol which we arc but .1 pait. And so most wisely has the univeisily appointed its annual anniversary, its day of days when it shall interrupt all its bus}' toil, cease the patient and pertinacious labor, call .i moiiu'htaiy h;ilt upon individual cHoil and ti anslij^ure the sihool into oiTe stru;4|;le, one idea, and lompaie that unity v.ith .ill contt luporai \' .iiitl io-mmIc tlu-mes. Wc have, tlicictoic, as a j)crmaiK;iil ^iill lo oui iiilclk'ilual life, as one of llie treasures of lliis ;^reat inslituliou lo be of in- creasing value wilh the revolving years, this festival anniversary, Coniinencenient thiy. It is a day saeretl to Learning, ii is a day when her devotees gather with delight and devotion, to make from their augmented and allied experiences some contribution to her weal. 'i'lu;se are days whiih as they niulliply in innnber and riM'ede into the past will constitute milestones in her history, making beautiful and alluring the atmosphere which surrounds the school, giving pride lo all those who by hcv eijuipped for manly duly shall from these walls go forth to hght tlu; battles of liie in her spirit and lor the truth for which she stands. It is therefore lilting that the Stale in the person of her chiefesl ollicers should here salute the School, that civic power and scholarship should here sit side by side in thai inseparable com- j>aMionship, which may not be destroyt^d. In this affectionate embrace, learning and law shall forever abide for neither can exist without the other. 'I'hat in this intimate and wise rela- tionship the Stale has some advantage none may tieny. ICxterior forces ordain and support her, but she would without other nourishment wither and decay. SeKishness and greed readily conceive need for her impeialive existence and are impelled lo her supjiort even by coarseness itself. Hut like k;arning for her increase and usefulness she must comuikiikI tin' alf(H:tioii and homage of loyal sons. Without this habit no ordination could perpetuate her benelicent reign. Nor can mere devotion to or- dained govermnent preserve her but by a wise perception and supply of her needs. l^^or so it is that in the evolution of our industrial life, in the multiplication of the di-sires of men and nations, in the ever widening lheal(;r of human industry, in the disturbances conse(pient on our inventive genius, we find our- selves day by day confronted with unsolved problems, present- ing ever and anon new diflicullies which no prec(;denl illumines, hedged around with disturbing doubts, which no prescience wholly removes. No blind follower ol the blind is adecpiate to |)oint wilh conlidence our course in this untrodden way And thus it is thai the State sununons leiiinitig to l.er ;iid and walks 34 with her hand in hand. She cannot permit a step forward save as she is guid jd by scholarship. It is the eye of the mind. They are each essential to the other, each halves of a golden whole. In the rivalries and contentions which new conditions, cupidi- ties and human ambitions incite, in the struggles born ot varied aspiration, impulse or hope, new problems are ever being pre- sented, crystalhzed and demanding solution. If there can be brought to that solution the calmness and prudence which wis- dom gives, the large examination and just determination which is her mission, no question, however, fraught with danger can long disturb nor seriously imperil the social or moral order. We are impelled to this companionship by considerations which a superficial knowledge even recognizes and affirms. For in the order of nature, worldly prosperity and moral good are inseparable and ever walk hand in hand. Contradictions of this truth seeming to be exceptions are apparent rather than real. No state or community has long survived the decay of morals, and morality is the die' ate of wise selfishness. Without enquiry as to their origin if the Ten Commandments, their memory and history, were blotted from literature, and thought of them utterly annihilated, human experience after much turmoil through any disasters and vicissitudes would recreate the impressive com- mands, and commend them to the approval of civilized men. And this is their vindication. Ignorance assumes the determination of complex controversies affecting the welfare of mankind without a wise knowledge of the difficulties presented and with the most superficial appli- cation of remedies proposed. Impulse rather than reason, im- patience rather than wisdom, are natural characteristics of the untrained mind, and we are in the midst of an era when un- trained minds confidently assume a superiority to human experi- ence and yield to impulse as a supreme guide. No controversy can be wisely and finally determined but by a comprehension of all the elements which enter into it, and the world is wasting its energy in struggles to correct things which seen only with par- tial vision it does not comprehend. 35 It is not by single instances, but by principles that remedies are found, it is not by the study of a single application to indi- vidual action that the public good is foreshadowed. Above all it is not by each party or person striving for the welfare of its or his craft to the disregard of all others that the orderly pro- gress of what we call civilization is made. And it seems to me that this is the mistake of our times. Some years since a dis- tinguished statesman — himself for many years ornamenting a seat in the Senate said : "These Senators have each their avoca- tion and experience, and are striving and voting from considera- tions affecting that avocation and experience exclusively." To this statement which unquestionably was an exaggeration of a perceived evil I expressed surprise and apprehension, but my fears he sought to allay by saying, so varied were these avoca- tions and personal interests that each had its representative and in the lapse of years and as a resulting strife, affairs ultimated about as well as if legislators acted from philosophical considera- tions. But there is too much of truth in the statement that in modern days we do not sufficiently act on the grave affairs which a democracy has in its keeping, from a comprehensive and philosophic view; we belittle learning and minimize the value of human history and the abstract rules deducible there- from. For the value of learning arises from its inerrant deduc- tions from every circumstance of human life, sifted and separ- ated from the accidents oE fortune, assorted, classified and com- pared until from them all a true rule of human conduct is evolved. Modern life will have no partial view, the entire hori- zon is its field of observation, it gives proper weight to every consideration, it insures against folly and is the impelling cause of moral and social order. Too much of human energy put forth for the same noble ends is wasted by diversity of view and jarring and discordant strife born of a want of knowledge diminishes the harvest of good. It is an old vision that "wisdom is the principal thing." Gee "wisdom and with all thy getting, get understanding." "Take fast hold of instruction, let her not go, keep her for she is thy life." And when our fathers put the burden of government upon 36 all the people and trusted to their skill to manage so complex an enterprise, their wisdom foretold the imperative need of learning to qualify the new kings for the new duty thus auda- ciously devolved upon them. No circumstance of their lives is of higher praise than their labor and sacrilice to establish insti- tutions of learning, to render secure the new system, which in their enthusiastic conception of human rights, they had thrust upon a surprised and expectant world. l^^tters theretofore in the hands of persons trained for their management, were henceforth to be confided to the common people, all unused to the complexities and the large considera- tions which sway peoples and take hold of and vitally affect their material welfare and give direction to their energy and hope. New conditions which in the mutations of human activi- ties were ever to arise with multiplied interrogations, impera- tively demanded solution. The moral and social order was to be conserved by action well nigh universal. No more were persons to be set apart from others to study governmental philosophy and enquire the beckonings, the warn- ings, the lessons of history. It is the chiefest thing that educa- tion forbids conclusion fcom fragmentary or partial views. It enables its votary to see the entire horizon and to comprehend the elements which enter into every question and decision, and to render justice to each of tiie diverse philosophies, dividing human thinking and to which portions of the human race adhere. It makes provincialism impossible, and its saving power is mani- fest in exposing to fatal questioning those differences which are apparent rather than real and which keep in futile turmoil, com- munities and states. It finds in abstract rules or past experience precedents which furnish a solution for every quandary, and an escape from every difficulty. But it is not the remembered text, or problems or their solutions, which give to learning its chief value. In its acquisition the human mind becomes agile in the pursuit of truth, eager for investigation, difficult of deception, confident of its resources, and pertinacious in the pursuit of un- discovered good. The times upon which we have fallen are of abounding in- 31 terest and the very era itself is one for congratulation. It is a time of strong and stormy agitation when new problems of gov- ernment and social life and morals impend demanding solution. Reformers are found on every hand, here intent upon reclaim- ing "Sahara" by processes which no wisdom justifies, and there with their heads in the clouds, impracticable and without com- prehension of the material with which they have to do. On every hand the long imprisoned winds are loosed, strange theories proposed, wonderful diagnoses of social wrongs .are propounded, until one must wonder at the innumerable evils seen and the thrice innumerable remedies prescribed. The ignorant are misled by the perspective, being swayed by that which is near and small rather than by that which is commanding but remote, as the briar at your nose seems greater than the oak on the horizon. ' Conscious of supreme and prevailing force, ignorance vaunts itself, but like Alciphron its devotees are swinging in air and darkness knowing not whither them the winds do blow. "Chaos umpire sits." Confusion and babble fill the air with their cries until the children of the wise in wonder are compelled to enquire and examine the evils which oppress and to soberly prescribe the remedies which may limit or eradicate their flagitious influence. It is the mission of scholarship to irradiate with its intelligence this might} nebulae of incoherence and to bring oider out of all this chaos. Selfishness and cupidity may prescribe for all this confusion their drowsy syrups, but earnestness and honesty will know the evil and its cause and will find an appropriate cure. Never was a generation of scholars called to so grave or high a mission. In the orderly progress of the world in times that are past, civilization has been slow paced, and her devotees could tell from the sure footing of to-day the appropriate and fitting step for to-morrow. But the century which is drawing to a close has been a succession of wonders in physical and in- tellectual life, it has leaped with wondering rapidity until we are farther away from the eighteenth century, than it was from the fifteenth, and in all the experience of the past there is no unmis- takable Pharos to guide us in the imminent and expanding future. 272380 38 We are still experimenting with goverment and with our feet occupying new and hitherto untrodden fields. The earth and man are alike in a transition state and the world is young. Indifferent to the historic processes of creation its incompleteness is apparent, there is no rest in its ever increas- ing momentum, and its onward march changing alike natural and artificial conditions is ever presenting new problems for scientific solution. Our best social and economic inventions are but adaptations to temporary conditions destined to become ob- solete when those existing conditions have passed away. Our visions are so narrow, and historic existence so short, we dwell so much on what is and what has been, that we are in- capable of comprehending that which is to be. We never think of the world when progression has reached its outmost farthest verge, when every rood of the habitable globe shall be strained to its utmost capacity and man shall limit his needs to utmost parsimony, that on this orb the countless throng may live. Then human solicitude will watch with vivid intentness, production and consumption, for betwden them there will be no margin. For the daily production of prolific and benignant nature there will be urgent and instant need. It would be an absorbing enquiry to ascertain the probable influence of these conditions upon our intellectual and physical life, what modification of morals may be probable, and what revolutions will occur in our social exis- tence. That when the myriad of people who then exist upon this orb, testing it to its utmost capacity shall be confronted each with the other, human existence will be difficult, will re- quire sacrifice, deference, industry, economy and forethought beyond an3'thing now deemed possible is apparent to the dullest observation. When every form of dissipation and vice shall have been abandoned, and every rood of land and sea yields its utmost to the hand of toil, when human existence is limited by the incapacity of the earth to yield more, it will have reached its normal condition and the world will be ripe. What will oc- cur beyond this completeness is beyond my ken if not beyond my curiosity. Childhood and age will engage in a supreme struggle to coax from earth's prolific womb another crumb to 39 sustain a life which else is doomed. But abounding and gener- ous nature will have exhausted her resources and farther life is superfluous on this earth, for it there is no sustenance, no place, no home. Then there will be no new continents or seas to dis- cover, no unoccupied islands will beckon, no desert will be so barren as to forbid, there will be no frontier to press or cross, no States to found, no gardens to lure. Tropic and frozen zone alike will yield their best and cavern and sky will alike be coaxed to become benignant ministers to human existence. There will remain a giant struggle to be. It is not given us to know through what eeons ot ages this orb will swing in space bearing on its surface its myriad of tragedies and in their contemplation the human mind is appalled. Awed by so vast a perspective and so remote a view the human mind refuses to continue the enquiry and shrinks from its contempla- tion. We are repelled from a vision which reveals only a dull un- varying monotonous condition of human endurance and with infinite gladness we turn to the Here and Now where hidden forces of nature are being discovered and applied, where con- quest invites, where human conditions are ameliorated, where accumulation rewards and man leaves his impress on the moral and physical world, where in short, there is achievement, con- quest and individual gratification. And it is this very velocity of a New World rapidly de- veloping itself under the guide of high intellectual activity that presents to us the strange and momentous difficulties we are called upon to solve. I speak not of political modifications and changes, nor dwell upon the hackneyed and trite theme of a new system of government, inaugurated by our fathers and based upon the inalienable rights of men. They are subjects perpetually discussed and no element entering into them is likely to escape observation. The discovery of continents and islands and their occupancy, the creation of new wants and new indus- tries, the inventive genius which finds expression in rapid transit, which has brought the four corners of the earth together, and the consequent intermingling of ideas and principles and pro- jects, has devolved upon this democracy, problems, before which 40 courage itself would almost pale. The lessons of yesterday are not the illuminations of tomorrow, for new conditions make them uninstructive, and they are inapphcable and unreliable as guides. As the problems are new, the examination of them must be original, and our thinking cannot be the routine think- ing of former times. We shall learn as much by contrast as by comparison, as much by the pursuit of abstract truth as by ob- servation of concrete instances. Prudence and foresight are supreme duties, and that which fits us for these is an invaluable possession. Philosophers have differed as to the meaning of these strange impulses v hich have seized the people of modern times, notabl}^ in our own land, which find expression in the creation of un- numbered civic and secret societies, each professing some sort of amelioration of human conditions. The optimist finds in them manisfestations of large friendliness and fellowship, and a desire on the part of each to be useful to all of his particular craft, and the pessimist sees nothing in them but social disintegration and the promise of disorder. Each probably exaggerates the con- sequence of these manifestations, but no imputation can rest upon the purpose of the actors in so strange an evolution. With excepiions too puerile and exotic to justify mention, the impulse of these people is manly and good. They desire good government, the diminution of human suffering, the mainte- ance of public order, and they think they see outside of these particular societies indifference to the welfare of their particu- lar functions. If they do not appreciate that political societies secret in character are a threat to democratic institutions, they will soon learn that great truth, and bring all their propositions and discussions to the light of day. Within the memory of many of us, in school and at church, at the fireside and on the forum, the supreme lesson sought to be taught was that scholarship was essential to statesmanship, that no person was fitted to deal with large themes affecting- multitudes of men, who had not been enlightened by history and philosophv, and who had not a sincere and earnest desire to promote the welfare of his fellow man. We learned this lesson 4^ as pupils in school, as lisping children at our mother's knee, and evjry observation and event in life justifies the storv and makes it the most impressive lesson of the time. It stood unchallenged and supreme, swaying all thought and truth, to which every in- telligence rendered willing and gladsome homage. But in the mutations of time and the accidents of fortune here in the United States, commenced a physical struggle, compared with which all former struggles pale into insignificance. The de- mand of the time was for men of iron with nerves of steel ; to them all eyes looked anxiously, and bid them welcome and although the strife which gave them prominence has passed awa}', the impress of their consequence has survived the period of their importance, and we live in forgetfulness of the fact, that the times call again as loudly as before, for scholarship, for philosophy, for friendly affection for the institutions that are to be moulded and shaped, so as best to promote human happi- ness. Some poet has lamented : "In the old days (a custom laid aside) with breeches and cocked hats, the people sent Their wisest men to make the public laws." And if this is an exaggeration, it nevertheless has in it a sub- stratum of truth. We are sought to be mislead from our inter- est by the plea that government is business, and that it may be trusted to business men, by which phrase we mean, money- getters, and so it has occurred, and is occurring, that men whose lives and thoughts and aims are the making of money, have charge in greater or lesser numbers of the most delicate mechanism ever submitted to the ingenuity, care and handiwork of man. That under such circumstances men are forgotten in public affairs and money is remembered with admiring solicitude need not be esteemed strange. The best men will take direction and form and their actions will comport with the avocations which they pursue, the ambitions which are personal to them, the hopes which they desire to have in their own instance fulfilled. Not all of us have the time or talent tor study, not all of us in 42 the exacting demands of this work-a-day world can grasp the influences that enter into wise legislation, and all of us can see that the drift of our modern life is in the rapid augmentation of material good and a distribution of it seemingly unfair, and all of us can see that the tendencies of the time are to magnify this money, to add to its potency in our social and political life, and to attribute to those who possess it qualities not unlike the divinities of ancient mythology. If governmental action is to be approached on sordid planes, it must be apparent to the dul- lest observation that there can be no civic pride, and civic pride is the impulse of patriotism the minister of morality, the assur- ance of fidelity to all the great interests submitted to its care- As we are limiting and annihilating the wide unoccupied pub- lic domain which remained for so many years a safet} valve for superfluous population and a theatre for incoherent vagaries, society rapidly crystallizes and becomes assorted, and social order ultimately presses harshly upon some classes of our peo- ple that before could find ample relief, now denied. Probably no circumstance of our lives has exercised so supreme an in- fluence upon physical existence as transportation furnished by steam. It has torn down and built up cities, it has burdened or helped communities and States, it has made intelligence well nigh universal, particularly that form of intelligence which re- sults from knowledge of human activities and which is superfi- cial learning. But we must not forget that such observation of men in proportion as it makes men confident, invites them to deal lightly with grave issues, for it magnifies the individual and minimizes the community, and laws must have regard to the community, and be justified from considerations affecting the masses rather than individuals. "Shallow drafts intoxicate the brain. But drinking deeply sobers us again." The story of the past centuries is a weary vision, it is de- formed by wars, by ignorance, by superstition. It presents the anomaly of uncounted millions governed by force of the few, a pyramid upon its apex, maintained through weary years of suf- fering, disorder and shame. 43 And now that dennociatic institutions have a secure foothold on all the continents, and are working the sure disintegration of absolutism, what grave questions have we in these United States, and in this Commonwealth confronting us ? What danger^ seem imminent in the future, against what perils must we guard, what remedies shall we prescribe for threatened evils ? These ques- tions address themselves to scholarship, and to the patriotism of all our people. For we cannot escape these perils by blindly shutting our eyes to them, and he must be thrice blind who can- not see in the intellectual tumult around us portents of evil. Economic disorders, political disturbances, social disintegration, challenges of the right of Government itself to be, and all these multiplied, and that too in a country whose corner stone is that the people themselves shall rule. Perhaps no individual has voiced more despairingly the pos- sibilities in store for a democracy, than did Lord Macaulay, a generation ago in his letter to Mr. Randall, the author of the life of Jefferson. He said : "You are surprised to learn that I have not a high opinion of Mr. Jefferson, and I am surprised at your surprise. I am cer- tain that I never wrote a line, and that I never, in Parliament, in conversation, or even on the hustings — a place where it is the fashion to flatter the populace — uttered a word indicating an opinion that the supreme authority in a state ought to be en- trusted to the majority of citizens told by the head ; in other words, to the poorest and most ignorant part of society. I have long been convinced that institutions purely democratic, must sooner or later, destroy liberty or civilization, or both. In Europe, where the population is dense, the effect of such institutions would be almost instantaneous. What happened lately in France IS an example. In 1848 a pure democracy was estabhshed there. During a short time there was reason to expect a general spoli- ation, a national bankruptcy, a usurpation of the soil, a maxuDum of prices, a ruinous load of taxation laid on the rich for the pur- pose of supporting the poor in idleness. Such a system would, in twenty years, have made France as poor and barbarous as the France of the Carlovingians. Happily, the danger was 44 averted ; and now there is despotism, a silent tribune, an en- slaved press. Liberty is gone, but civilization has been saved. I have not the smallest doubt, that if we had a purely demo- cratic government here the effect would be the same. Either the poor would plunder the rich, and civilization would perish or order and prosperity would be saved by strong military gov- ernment, and liberty would perish. You may think that your country enjoys an exemption from these evils. I will frankly own to you that I am of a very differ- ent opinion. Your fate I believe to be certain, though it is de- ferred by physical causes as long as you have a boundless ex- tent of fertile and unoccupied land, your laboring population will be far more at ease than the laboring population of the Old World, and, while that is the case, the Jefferson politics may continue to exist without causing any fatal calamity. But the time will come when New England will be as thickly peopled as Old England. Wages will be as low, and will fluctuate as much with you as with us. You will have your Manchesters and your Birminghams, and in those Manchesters and Birminghams hundreds of thousands of artisans will assuredly be sometimes out of work. Then your institutions will be fairly brought to the test. Distress everywhere makes the laborer mutinous and discontented, and inclines him to listen with eagerness to agita- tors who tell him that it is monstrous iniquity that one man should have a million, while another cannot get a full meal. In bad years there is plenty of grumbling here, and sometimes a little rioting. But it matters little. For here the sufferers are not the rulers. The supreme power is in the hands of a class, numerous indeed, but select ; of an educational class ; of a class which is, and knows itself to be, deeply interested in the secur- ity of property and the maintenance of order. Accordingly the malcontents are firmly yet gently restrained. The bad time is got over without robbing the wealthy to relieve the indigent. The springs of National prosperity soon begin to flow again, work is plentiful, wages rise, and all is tranquility and cheerful- ness. I have seen England pass three or four times through such critical seasons as I have described. Through such sea- 45 sons the United States will have to pass in the course of the next century, if not of this. How will you pass through themr I heartily wish you a good deliverance. But my reason and my wishes are at war, and I cannot help foreboding the worst. It is quite plain that your Government will never be able to re- strain a distressed and discontented majority. For with you the majority is the Government, and has the rich, who are always a minority absolutely at its mercy. The day will come when in the State of New York a multitude of people, none of whom has had more than half a breakfast, or expects to have more than half a dinner, will choose a legislature. Is it possible to doubt what sort of a legislature will be chosen ? On one side is the Statesman preaching patience, respect for vested rights, strict observance of public faith. On the other is a demagogue ranting about the tyranny of capitalists and usurers, and asking why anybody should be permitted to drink champagne and to ride in a carriage, while thousands of honest folks are in want of necessaries. Which of the two candidates is likely to be pre- ferred by a working man who hears his children cry for more bread ? I seriously apprehend that you will, in some such sea- son of adversity as I have described, do things which will pre- vent prosperity from returning ; that you will act like people who should in a year of scarcity devour all the seed-corn, and thus make the next a year not of scarcity, but of absolute la- mine. There will be, I fear, spoliation. The spoliation will in- crease the distress, the distress will produce fresh spoliation. There is nothing to s^op you. Your Constitution is all sail and no anchor. As I said before, when society has entered on this downward progress, either civilization or liberty must perish. Either some Csesar or Napoleon will seize the reins of Gov- ernment with a strong hand or your RepubHc will be as fearfully plundered and laid waste by barbarians in the twentieth century as the Roman Empire was in the fifth ; with this difference, that' the Huns and Vandals who ravaged the Roman Empire came from without, and that your Huns and Vandals will have been engendered within your own country by your own institu- tions. 46 Thinking thus, of course I cannot reckon Jefferson among the benefactors of mankind. I readily admit that his intentions were good, and his abihties considerable." }Iow Macaulay in this letter but echoed the fears of that pa- triotic and splendid democrat Edmund Burke, who two genera- tions before had misread the occasional excess and wild Justice of the French Revolution and had thereby been driven from his integrity of judgment manifested in so many exigencies of human history and which in spite of this defection has written high his name among the benefactors of mankind. The story of the French Revolution perverted distorted and uncompre- hended has done large service to monarchs, but its errand for that purpose is closed. Lord Macaulay, in this extract which I have read in your hearing seemed to think that education did not keep pace with responsibilities, and that patriotism is not a perpetually in- creasing impulse, that the possessors of money, however sordid, would not possess the instinct of self-preservation and diligently enquire how best to protect themselves, and would not answer an inquiry so supreme to them by providing for the education and comfort of the masses of the people into whose hands such grave trusts are confided. As if the very form of government was not an assurance that the experience of Manchester and Birmingham was not possible in a democracy, that the condition and forces of labor and capital were seem- ingly rather than really hostile, that the profits of each in the long run and over the whole era must be divided among all, and this too without cataclysm or tumult, but as the outgrowth of a correct comprehension of their relations to each other. He did not seem to realize that evils must grow to certain dimensions before they are adequately defined and a remedy prescribed, and he forgot the inexorable certainty with which a democracy applies the remedy to every evil which the times reveal. He did not appreciate how education cultivates the virtue of pa- tience, or the confidence which a great people feels in its own adequacy and its capacity to deal with every evolution and de- velopment that calls for public action. If ignorance is to pre- 47 vail, if partial wisdom is only here and there to exist, the calam- ities which he foretells are not onl} probable but assured. But the institution whose anniversary today we celebrate, with all its related institutions wherever civilization and democra- cy plant their footsteps, are assurances of the probabilities of the existence of this form of government so long as Time en- dures. Indeed recalling all that has transpired in our own Re- public and in other Republics since Lord Macaulay's letter was written, showing the adequacy and omnipotence of democracy, it would be interesting to have a second letter prognosticating the future of democracy from the mind which foretold its early destruction so graphically 36 years ago. For if there is one assurance doubly assured, it is that dem- ocratic institutions are on this earth to sta}', that they year by year are gathering strength, that their influence is widening," that no government is so absolute or monarchical but that it has been permeated with the spirft of democracy, and no circum- stance can be foretold with more certainty than tha't in the not remote future, emperors and kings will live only in story and song. Wiser was the apprehension of the great poet Laureate who found his assurance of the perpetuity of the British con- stitution in the fact, that it was "Broad based upon a people's will." Not unlike the prophesies of Lord Macaulay was the forecast of Charles Fourier a century ago, he, tracing the growth of Nations, its iijfluence upon individual thought and action, and the successive steps from the rudest beginning to a complete indus- trial and economic condition, pictured the misfortune which must attend the final evolution of industrial Hfe as to four phases which that civilization would assume. This observer of men and discoverer of influences which actu?ite them has not had justice rendered to his labors or his memory, because of the crudeness of som<- of the remedies for social evils which were by him proposed. He seems in a larger sense than Macaulay to have traced the influences of economic crystallization to their ultimate realization and described those consequences with great perspicuity. He said : 48 "Civilization is tending toward the fourth phase, by the influ- ence of Joint Stock Corporations, which, under the cover of certain legal privileges dictate terms and conditions to labor, and arbitrarily exclude from it whomsoever they pleased. These cor- porations contain the germ of a vast feudal coalition which is destined soon to invade the whole industrial and financial system, and give birth to a commercial feudalism, * * * * These cor- porations will become dangerous and lead to new outbreaks and convulsions, only by being extended to the whole commercial and industrial system. The event is not far distant, and will be brought about all the more easily from the fact that it is not ap- prehended. * * * * Extremes meet ; and the greater the ex- tent to which anarchical competition is carried the nearer is the approach to the reign of universal monopoly, which is the oppo- site excess. It is the fate of civilization to be always balancing between extremes. Circumstances are tending toward the or- ganization of the commercial classes into federal companies or affiHated monopolies, which, operating in conjunction with the great landed interests, will reduce tne middle and laboring clas- ses to a state of commercial vassalage, and by the influence of combined action will become master of the productive industry, of entire nations. The small operators will be forced indirectly to dispose of their products according to the wishes of these monopolists ; they will become mere agents for the coalition. We shall thus see the re-appearance of feudalism m an inverse order, founded on mercantile leagues, and answering to the bar- onial leagues of the middle ages. Everything is concurring to produce this result. * * * We are marching with rapid strides toward a commercial feudalism, and to the fourth phase of civ- ilization." Having regard to the statements by these respective philos- ophers of the ultimate destiny of government and condition of mankind, we should be compelled to acknowledge their justness if we did not comprehend the ever widening sphtre of human knowledge, the ever-increasing fidelity of the common people to the institutions of government, and now upon a retrospection of these prophesies of evil, it is apparent that the threats of 49 disorder and disintegration were manifold greater in arbitrary or monarchical governments thar: in democracies. For when a timeshall come pictured with so much lucidity by Lord Macau- lay, that hunger or imperative human needs shall be the control- ling impulse of men, it will be a question of numerical and phy- sical force to which all power must bow. There will be no awe of nobility, no awe of royalty, when hunger seizes the majority of mankind. If such a period should arrive, monarchies would be useless, and property itself inconsequential. For accumu- lated capital could not hope to withstand so supreme a trial. It is a just judgment in my view which holds, that democratic gov- ernment administered by an educated and intelligent people is now and will then remain the only security which capital will have. Indeed human needs and accumulated wealth in democracies will never lock horns, if government be administered on princi- ples which make accumulated capital as against wide spread hunger impossible. And if it shall seem that in these Itjler days events contradict this statement, we must remember that we are only at one period in the stage of this development, that schol- arship is busied, with considerations which make the solution of this contention probable, and that in the order of nature harmony between all classes and conditions will certainly be evolved. The pressure of the circumstances foreseen by the great historian is not yet powerful, but public attention is turned to their solution with an unanimity and intelligence that makes the catastrophe which he apprehends impossible. The evolution of our indus- trial life presents other themes equally important and arrests the attention of the student of political economy with a seriousness fully equal to ^the one so graphically described. We are confronted to-day by an inquiry touching not wholly the question as to who shall have accumulated wealth, but vvhat new energy or life shall be put into money at the expense ot the individual. We are compelled to ask what is the sovereignty of a State and to whom of right does its exercise belong ? Is it capable of diminuiion or division ? Is it wise to farm it out to favored citi- zens ? Is it scientific that all the people shall refuse to exercise the 50 supreme power for all the purposes for which government among men is founded, frightened therefrom by evils eloquently por- trayed imaginative or real? It is not the first time in the history of government that the sovereign authority of a State has been farmed out to its citizens. The revenues of ancient empires were farmed to distinguished individuals, they paying to the pub- lic treasurer a fixed amount for the privilege of collecting the taxes in certain provinces. That experiment wrought upon these Empn-es overwhelming disaster. It scandahzed government and historic names, and wrote its inexorable result in faction and dis- order and civil war. That form of dividing sovereignty has ceased in civilized nations, but in other forms we have abdicated sovereignty and transferred it to individuals with a frequency and freedom unknown in the ancient times. Its subtle influence almost imperceptible in its beginning has become so widespread and potent that it almost defies the State, and a recent article in a current number of one of our leading reviews, proposed im- pudently and with gravity to reform politics on lines which shall hold that the fragmentary sovereignty which we have farmed out to our citizens shall control and govern the sovereignty which remains. Learning abashed at no audacity will proceed to enquire in the light of past experiences and of philosophy herself whether we have not in this respect travelled forbidden paths. She will pro- ceed to strip from arrogant pretense the sophistry by which she attempts'to bolster up her authority and will remorselessly ex- pose to all the people the functions and duties of government without fear, without favor or bias of any kind. We shall know as the result of her inquiries whether the sovereignty of the State is for all of the people or for favored sons. She will know what advantages we have already given whereby they who wield this most supreme majesty are enabled to oppress and burden those not thus favored, and she will be deluded by no names. In whatever disguise men seek to cover up their pos- sessions and title to a part of the supreme power and justify their "right to exercise it, she will know whether the fact itself exists, and whether if it does exist it can be justified. 51 Other questions obtrude themselves upon the Nation of equal consequence and require the most patient consideration. How shall we deal with anomalous populations flocking lo our shores in larg-e numbers, who, by reason of religious differences or ir- religion, or diverse habitudes and experience, or by different ambitions or want of ambition, refuse to assimilate with our peo- ple, and project into the Republic a force foreign to its quality and aim, to become therein a festering sore. How deal with anomalous populations native to our soil, not yet in sympathy with our moral or intellectual life? These questions press for solution, and ignorance and dogmatism arrogate to themselves the right to determine them on lines of hatred and prejudice, from considerations of narrow and selfish personal interest rather than philosophically and in the light of the elements which enter into so grave a discussion. The relation of accumulated labor, which is capital, to labor not yet resultant, the frictions which are therefrom produced, press themselves upon our attention, and must be intelligently and justly solved. This cannot be done by force and its resultant passions, nor yet can the wrongs of labor be righted by enforced idleness, harmful alike to every interest involved. May we refuse to submit the State to the control of its intel- ligence and morality because of sex ? What material shall be recognized as the measure of values thereto recommended by stability and universal desire and preciousness? How shall we deal with the ancient impulse of the people to poison themselves and waste their needed substance with intoxicants ? Where shall we locate the limit of Legislative action, controlling the affairs of men and protecting the interests of all the people, and yet avoid that paternalism which is an impertinence in individual affairs ? How shall we inspire our people with a united purpose to re- ward independence of thinking and to punish the cringing ser- vility that holds no cause so sacred but that it is willing to flatter the mean and endorse the coarse and low ? How can we culti- vate the moral fibre of men, that shall lead them to prefer say- ing the things that are true rather than the things that are sweet ? The relations of men in the pressure of increasing population to the soil of the State, is another question forced upon the con- sideration, by that earth hunger of our people which has in- duced them in individual instances to acquire large areas of land, and by devices from generation to generation in effect abolish- ing the laws forbidding -pi-hnogeniture^ and with gradually in- creasing area and value, maintaining in families these vast es- tates. Enquiry also into our system of taxation from a scien- tific basis must answer the interrogations now gravely addressed to Legislators, whether the drift and tendency of our laws do not burden individuals rather than estates, men rather than money, with the cares of Government. Out of the somewhat kaleidoscopic decisions of the relations of the State to its im- proved highways, science must evolve a consistent and coherent theory, and laws must be enacted which shall enforce that theory against the greed and ambitions of men with absolute and inex- orable justice. The heritage of liberty bequeathed by our fathers must be shielded against threatened evils insiduously assailing it under the guise of churchly solicitude or other plausible pretexts and scholarship is taxed ever to its utmost tension to solve these and kindred questions. For she may not shirk the care of all these great and varied interests whether they pertain to morals or money. There is devolved upon her the care of the capital of the State, for it is largely her creation. It is the accumulated achieve- ments of science, the result of toilsome labor in laboratories and libraries that constitute the vast portion of human possessions which our inventive genius has created for mankind. If you shall examine the compendium of the Eleventh Census of the United States, and contrast it with the first, you will be amazed to see the growth of the country in this one regard. At the opening of the present century, land and ships and cattle constituted nearly all the wealth of the State, and its people, but since then, men of affairs have taken the discoveries of science, the results of the labors of scholars, and have adapted them to human needs, until one stands appalled at the magnitude of val- ues resulting therefrom. And having thus created so vast a 53 mass of values, fulfilling in every nook and crannv and in every department of human activity beneficent purposes, certainly the creators of it are charged with its care. And if it seems from lime to time that it in the hurly-burly of our activities, we do not appreciate liow much science has had to do with the augmenting wealth of nations upon its sordid side ; if we shall hear of attempts to belittle its consequence in this great struggle of ours, upon which for a century we have been engaged, a retrospection of that century will vindicate the truth I have stated and place the world in appropriate relation to the scholars who have achieved so much. They have liUed Milton's conception of men "inflamed with the study of learning and the admiration of virtue stirred up with high hopes, livmg to be brave men and worthy patriots, dear to God and famous to all ages. That there will be perfect social order for centuries is too much to hope, but as it has been the fortune of the United States to be in the vanguard of democracies, so in all the perils which will confront them in time to come, we fain would hope and confidently believe, that there will here be a benign and in- telligent and potential example, teaching the great lesson that learning, that scholarship, that morality, give assurances of the perpetuity of Republican Institutions. The School has a high function in determining the grave questions which impend as ii has had a high career in the conquests which are gone. This young institution by your fidelity has a high companion- ship, and in contemplation of its alluring future the pulseless blood starts into new life. Abounding gratitude is due to pupils to managers to patrons to all who by deed and word give it strength, courage and confidence in its career and the iron lids of sordid dullness sh.ill yet awaken to its benignant mission. It I have not overstated the mission of this school in the growth of the state, its claim upon the citizens is certainly su- preme. Their sympathy with it, their care of it, their contribu- tions to it of personal sympathy and n-aterial aid is a command- ing duty. Nor is there any reason to doubt in the midst of some discouragements, but that the citizens of this commonwealth 54 feel in this institution an abiding pride, and have it in their heart of hearts to maintain it in their midst as part and parcel of the civiHzation which they have here founded. If there has been apparent indifference to its welfare, it is seeming rather than real. In guiding a new community in an uncrystalHzed condi- tion in the earlier stages of its creation and settlement, painful solicitudes to the intelligent citizen are found on every hand. It is a high deed to plant a state, and the actors in so majestic an epic, watchful of all the tendencies of the time, and perceiv- ing the duties which day by day devolve and day by day change, are engaged in a labor grander than they know. They do not realize iti the midst of these labors and ambitions the forces which they are bringing into harmonious relations with each other, the momentum that they are giving to great causts, nor how great the life they are living nor the story they are telling. Contrasted with life in settled communities, where individual impress upon public affairs is diminished and limited, life in a new country is an inspiring and gracious privilege. We dwell in another world and upon other themes than those that fill the minds of people in communities that have matured. And the gratifications which come to us in such a mission un- spoken though they be, are nevertheless ta^ngible until we can exclaim with the poet : "One crowded hour of glorious life. Is worth an age without a name." My purpose will not have been fulfilled in these words of con- gratulation at your environment and commendation of your great institution, unless they ahall have a personal application and in- fluence upon each pupil and all connected with it. For you are to be henceforth the inseparable companions of this institution of learning, and her good name is henceforth in your keeping. You will make or mar that name, and your potency over her prosperity and in the affairs of mankind will be measured by your action and words. Certainly with such grave consequen- ces impending, none of vou can do or say a mean thing. Da}^ by day you are called upon to act and speak in the light of her invocations and aspirations, proudly conscious that she will 55 accompany you with affectionate solicitude and make you stronj; in her strength through every vicissitude of your career. The board of trustees which manages it, the faculty who are instruc- tors, and the pupils who attend upon their ministrations, each and all, henceforth are invoked to high deeds in her behalf and in her name. For it is your action that is to surround and char- acterize this school and give it fame and a name among men. And the great State of which it is a part gazes solicitously upon it and you, knowing full well that in your possession is a gift of pride or shame. And yonder fair and thrifty hillside city, confi- dent, lusty, sturdy, strong alike in the strength of her history and destiny, bends over this fair institution, showering upon it every benediction and grace, and prophesying and promising that it shall be a fountain of beneficence, until the perpetual hills shall bow, and the shining stars shall fade from out the ancient sky. mOflTflflfl UfUVEf^SITV -rs THE BEST HOC / J'J'lJJt- Boardir)(^ §e[?ool ii) /|\oi>ta9a, -AJVI) ITS HATES THE MOST REASOSABB. . . . BOHRD HND TUITION . . . IV I T 'II' If I ft \ i;r.'l\('lli:s J'OJt THE E.\J1I!I s( tfooi /.•l\i:i iitov ■-,.:! lit $'i4'i ACCOnDiya lU iiU.MH . Send fop Catalogue to the Pfesident, F. P. TOCUEt^, fl. m., D. D. HELENA, (VIONTANA:^^ UNIVERSITY of CALIFORN!JP AT Tfc AWQELES UCLAYoung Research Library LD3527.2 1893 yr L 009 612 307 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY AA 001324 560