n LIBRARY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA I PRESENTED BY MRS. MACKINLEY HELM A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE VOL. IV A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE RY J. R. GREEN, M.A. ILLUSTRATED EDITION EDiTF.n BY Mks. J. R. GREEN and Miss KATE NORGATE VOLUME IV LONDON MA CM I LEAN AND CO. A N IJ N K \V YORK 1894 'I'lie liif^lil of Tiantlnlion and l\i'f>toilii<:liou it Ai-irrrnf RicTiAui) Ct.ay and Sons, Limitf.d, LONDON AND HUNGAY. 30 LIBRARY / 7 UNIVERSTTy OF CATJFORNIA ^ SANTA BARBARA V, f CONTENTS PAGE Notes on the Illustrations Ixxxiii — cvi CHAPTER IX \ THE REVOLUTION {conthiiied) Sect. 5. — Shaftesbury, 1679 — 1682 1411 ,, 6. — The Second Stuart Tyranny, 1682 — 1688 1431 „ 7. — William of Orange 1465 „ 8. — The Grand Alliance, 1689 — 1697 1492 ., 9. — Marlborough, 1698 — 1712 1531 „ 10. — Walpole, 1712 — 1742 1577 CHAPTER X MODERN ENGLAND Sect. I. — William Pitt, 1742 — 1762 1607 ., 2. — The Independence of America, 1 76 1 — 1782 1657 ,, 3. — The Second Pitt, 1783 — 1793 171S „ 4. — The War with France, 1793 — 181 5 1763 Ei'n,0(;uK 1829 Chronological Annals of I^nolish History 1851 (Iknealocical Tamlls 1865 Index 1875 NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS PACK Engraving ON Title-page OF "]\Iusick's Handmaide," 1663 1411 The Duchess of Lauderdale's Boudoir, Ham House 141 3 Ham House, Petersham, built by Sir Thomas Vavasour in 1610, was for a time the residence of Prince Henry, eldest son of James I. In 1643 Charles I gave it to his friend William Murray, whom he created Earl of Dysart. Title and house passed to Lord Dysart's eldest daughtei% Elizabeth ; from her first marriage sprang the family which still owns the place ; her second husband was the too famous Duke of Lauderdale, and the state rooms at Ham, furnished and decorated by the Duke and Duchess, have remained unaltered ever since. The polished parquet floor of the boudoir is inlaid with the Duchess's monogram, E. D. L. ; she and the Duke are said to have usually held their inivate talks seated in the two arm-chairs in the recess. Ham House: The Cabal Room 1414 In this room, which adjoins the boudoir, the Cabal ministry held its private meetings. Furniture and decorations remain exactly as they were then. The tapestry hangings represent rural scenes ; they were made for the Duke of Lauderdale at the neighbouring tapestry works at Mortlake. Ham House: The Long Gallery 141 5 ]\'siM?,, TiVK^ o? 'Mo'suovTn {picture by Lely a( Dalkeith Palace) 1417 Banner used by the Covenanters at Drumclog and Bothwell Bridge {Napier, " Memoirs of Dundee'^) 1418 Of blue silk, the inscriptions painted in gold, white and red. The Hebrew words are "Jehovah Nissi," i.e., " The Lord is my banner." 'iX'SlV'El. V^EVYS {picture by John Hayh in National Portrait Gallejy) I419 Pepys (born 1632, died 1703) was clerk of the Acts of the Navy, while James, Duke of York, was Lord High Admiral. The close relations into which they were brought by their offices served as a pretext for Pepys' imprisonment in the Tower in 1679 on account of the Popish Plot. Nine months later he was released and made Secretary to the Admiralty, a post which he kept till the Revolution. The portrait here given is mentioned by Pepys in his " Diary " ; it was painted in 1666, and represents him holding in his hand a song of his own composition, " Beauty, i-etire," to which he frequently alludes. Francis North, Lord Guilford, Keeper of the Great Seal, 1680 {from an engraving by G. Vei'tue after David Loggan) 1 420 Medal of the Duchess of Portsmouth, 1673 1423 By John Roettier. The die is in the British Museum. George Savile, Viscount Halifax (from Houbrakcn's engraving of a picture in the possession of Sir George Savile) 1424 Parade of Militia at Abergwili, 1684 {from Messrs. Blades^ facsimile of Thomas Dinelcy's '' Progress of the Duke cf Beaufort through IFales, 1684"). 1426 Mkdal Struck to Commemorate Shaftesbury's Acquittal, 1681 . . . 1428 A rare silver medal, by George Bower : struck for Shaftesbury's partisans, who wore it on their breasts. Dryden thus describes it in a satirical poem entitled " The Medal " : " One side is fill'd with title and with face ; And, lest the King should want a regal place, < )n the reverse a Tower the t(jwn surveys ' )'er which our mounting sun his beams displays The word, pronounced aloud by shrieval voice, /.m JA-ssj-s. Blades,' fuc- simile of Diucky's '■^ Progress of the Duke of BeauJ'oit"^ MJI Wii I lAM, Lord Russei.i. {from an engraving hy Pieter van dcr Banc/;, after Sir G. A'ncller) 143^ MoNUMKNT ui- John Martin, 1'kintkr i434 In the crypt of S. Paul's Cathedral. The inscription contains some unde- cipherable words, but may be thus rendered: "Sacred to piety and to the republic of letters. Near this place lie (alas ! alas ! ) the mortal remains of John Martin, late Warden of the .... Printers" Company of N. . . . ; "a man famous even in foreign lands for the learned books which he ])ublished, but more illustrious at home for the higlily honourable qualities of his mind. I le expired on the third day of May, 1680, in the 72nd year of his age. Under here rest also his children, Henry and Mary. That this should not be unknown was the care of his faithful wife, Sara (daughter of) Henry Graunt, citizen and draper, who erected this monument to her worthy husband." ''The Abolition OF Monarchy."' 1436 Frontispiece to the second volume of Nalson's "Collection of .Affairs of Stale from 1639 to the Murder of King Charles I.," 1683. Some verses on the opposite page explain its meaning : "Thus black look't Ileav'n, the Lightning thus did lly, Tluis th' Hurricane oresiJied the British sky. When th' Royal Sin'creign weather-beaten lay On the proud Billows of the popular Sea ; The Captain from his Cabin driven away In that for ever execrable Day ; From that adjacent House, behold the cause Of "all this Tempest, whence perverted Lawes, Unpresidented, undetermin'd Power, Blasted our Hopes, and did our Land devour, A Land like that of Canaan heretofore ; Till, by mad Zeal into Confusion hurl'd, 'Twas made the Scorn and By-word of the World." The chief value of the picture lies in the view which it gives of the e.xtcrior of the old House of Commons. Corporation Insignia of Coventry {Art Journal) 1437 Coventry is unusually rich in corporation insignia, including, besides a sword and several maces, a chair of state, the town keys, and some remarkable robes of oflice. Practically they may be said to date from the seventeenth century, although, as they have all continued in use down to the present time, all have been restored or renewed more than once ; in all these restorations, however, the old pattern has been faithfully adhered to. The great mace bears the initials of Charles II. ; the smallest is of the same period ; the third, intermediate in size, has the arms of the Commonwealth. The sword is two-edged, and bears the inscription, " Civitas Coventre." Above the large mace is the hat of the mace-bearer ; at the foot of the chair is shown the sword-bearer's cap of maintenance. On the chair lie the town keys, and the hat of the city crier, more modern than the others, and dating probably from the eighteenth century. His coat hangs above ; on the left sleeve is the only ancient badge which Coventry still possesses, of silver, and dating probably from about 1606. NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS Ix.xxv I'AGK Maces, Fifteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. 1438 The first two figures (from the Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries, 1888) are typical iUustrations of the way in which the mace as a symbol of office was evolved out of the war-mace. When the mace was no longer wanted for fighting, its handle was first fashioned into a knob or boss to receive the royal arms ; then the mace was turned upside down, the head became the handle, the llanges were converted into mere ornaments, and in course of time disajipeared, and were replaced by a heavy boss, to counterbalance the weight of the heail, which had meanwhile been growing in size, and to which a crown liad been added. The first stage of this development is shown in the Southampton s mace, where the flanged end still forms the head. In the Newtown mace the head is formed by the broad boss. The plate on the top of this bears the arms of Henry VH. ; it is loose, and on its reverse are engraved the arms of the Commonwealth. The two Stamford maces (reproduced from the .-Iri Journal) are fine examples of the complete development which the mace had reached in the time of Charles II. RoYAi. Order for the Expulsion of John Locke from Christ Church, Oxford 1439 Locke, knowing that he was suspected by the Government on account of his intimacy with Shaftesbury, went in 1683 to Holland. In November, 1684, the Dean of Christ Church, Oxford, was desired by Sunderland to remove Locke's name from the list of Students ; a few days later came a peremptory order, in the King's name, which was at once obeyed, and which is here reproduced from the original, still preserved at Christ Church. It will be noticed that neither King nor minister seems to have even known the Christian name of the great philosopher. The conduct of Charles towards Locke strikingly illustrates the "danger" to English freedom which lay "in the character and purpose of Charles himself" (p. 1438). Enthronement of James II. and his Queen {F. Saiidfoni, "■ History of the Coronation of James 11 " 1687) 1440 The Challenge {Sandford, "Coronation of James II.") 1442 The manor of Scrivelsby, co. Lincoln, had been held to carry with it the office of champion since the time of Henry I. at least, though tliere is no record of the actual ceremony earlier than the coronation of Richard II. At that of James II. the champion was Sir Charles Dymoke ; he was " coni- pleatly armed in one of His Majesties best suits of white armour, mounted on a goodly white horse, richly caparisoned." Two trumpeters, the sergeant trumpeter (carrying a mace), two sergeants-at-arms, the champion's two squires (bearing his lance and shield), and the York Herald, preceded him into the hall. On his right rode the Lord High Constable, on his left the Earl Marshal. The engraving here reproduced represents the first challenge to combat of any person who disputed the King's title. York Herald is reading the closing words of the challenge, and the gauntlet lies on tlie floor. After a pause it was taken u]), the procession moved on, and the challenge was repeated in the middle of the hall, and then again at its upjjcr end before the dais where sat the King and (^ueen. The only occasion when the challenge was taken up was the coronation of George HI., when a Jacobite in woman s dress was said to have snatched up the gauntlet, and left another in its place. The ceremony was last performed at the crowning of George IV. ]k'SiVS\l, {illumination on patent in Public Record Office) 1443 Ukidgewater High Cross 1445 Now taken down ; here reproduced from an engraving in the Proceedings of the Somerset Arch;voIogical Society. The Cross stood on Cornhili, o])po- site the entrance to the High Street, and was used as a market-place. On it was inscribed : " Minil ycjur own l)usiness. " Over it was a cistern supplied from a l)rook by an engine at Queen's Mill, and from this cistern water was conveyed to tlie streets. The cnxss was also used as a jilace of assembly. Monmouth was proclaimed king there, after he left Taunton, and his declara- tion read by the Mayor. Ixxxvi NOTES ON Till', ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE ScYTiiKS FOUND. AT Skvgvmoor {Ttm'er of Lo»(f,»i) 1446 Mounted on poles and used as weapons by the peasantry. Battle of Sf.ogemoor {" Eiis;flaii/s Schomvtoneel verhceldende het vliigic van Jacobus JI. &>(-.," Amsterdam, 1690) 144^ Georgk Jkkfreys, Lord Ciukf lusiicic (front an cng^ravivg by K. White after Sir G. Kucller) " 1447 The Royal IIORSE Guards, temp. Charles II • . 1448 Krom Hollar's engraving of the coronation procession of Ciiarlcs II. Tiie (lurirds were then commanded by the Duke of York, who is seen riding at their head. Medal of Louis XIV., Commemorating the Revocation of the Edict OF Nantes {British Muscnnt) 1449 House of a Huguenot Silk Weaver in St. Peter's Street, Canter- bury • .• • '450 From a jihotograpli. This is a typical illustration of the domestic silk- factories set up by the French Protestant refugees in England after the Revocation of the Indict of Nantes. The shop-window occupies the whole front on the ground lloor ; over this is the living-room of the family, where the weaver wrought at his trade, assisted by his sons and daughters ; higher still, in the gable, is a tall, narrow door with two valves, opening down to the floor of the attic, through which, by means of a small crane, raw material and bales of finished goods were drawn up to be stored in this warehouse on the top story. A Calico-Printer, temp. James II. {Bagford Collection, British Museum) . . 145 1 The Pope Receiving the Ambassador of England, 1687 1452 In 1687 Roger, Earl of Castlemaine, was sent by James II. on a special embassy to Rome. Next year an authorised " Account " of his journey and reception was published in Italian and English, with this frontispiece and other illustrations, by Castlemaine's secretary, John Michael Wright. Titi.e-Page of Missal 1454 From a photograph obtained through the kindness of the Rev. Dr. Stokes. This missal was given by James II. to John ISrenan, Roman Catholic Arch- bishop of Cashel. Brenan, as the inscription in his handwriting on the title- page shows, presented it to Cashel Cathedral (of which he had possession throughout James's reign, no successor having been appointed to the Protest- ant Archbishop Price, who died in 1685). Thence it passed with the books left by the next Protestant Archbishop, Narcissus Marsh, to the library of St, Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin, where it is now. Satirical Playing-Card, temp. James II. {British Museum) 1455 Halbert (Seventeenth Century) from ^o^\^{To%ver of London) 1457 Magdalen College, Oxford, in the Seventeenth Century (//v La/nbcrt Vische7') 1472 William III. of Orange when a child {from an etching by L. Kichcton, in the " Portfolio,'^ of a picture by A'einbrant/t in the collection of Earl Spencer) 1474 Dutch IMusket ( Tower of London) I475 The inscription means " True to Orange until death." French Pistoliers at the Storming of Aerdenburgh, 1672 {contem- porary Dutch engraving) 1476 The pistoliers here depicted show that the lock has been so far perfected as to admit of a piece being used easily with one hand. A formidable volume of fire was delivered on a given point by lines charging, halting, firing and •wheeling in rapid succession. The French are said to have adopted this system of warfare from the Germans. Palace at the Hague ; E.xterior 1478 Palace at the Hague ; Courtyard 1480 These two views are from engravings published while William IH. was Stadholder. The palace was the residence of the Princes of Orange, and in it were held the Sessions of the High Court of Justice, the Provincial Court of Brabant, and the States-General of the United Provinces. The Seven Bishops returning from the Tower {"■ Engelamh Godsdicnst, tS~=\V.GV. OF l^o^no^nvMKY {" Engelants Schou-vtoneel") 1501 Tabernacle and Candlesticks given by James II. to Christ Church, Dublin iro2 From a drawing very kindly made by Air. Thomas Drew, R.II.A., specially for this book. The Cathedral of the Holy Trinity (commonly called Christ Church) was from the English invasion till 1870 the' Chapel Roval of Dublin Castle. During the occupation of Dublin by Jnmes II., April, 168S— July, 1690, Mass was said in the Cathedral for the King. The tabernacle and candlesticks then used are preserved in the crypt ; they were originally richly gilt and decorated. The ornamental cover of the ciborium was "stolen many years ago, and is now in the Carmelite Church, Whitcfriars Street. Londonderry Exchange (/;w« /;-/«/?■« j9;-«V/.f/wl/«5«/w) 1503 Tlie old Exchange was destroyed in the siege ; William and Mary gave ;if 1500 towards the building of the new one here represented. 'i^l^CF. (\K\'<>n), i6c)G {South Kensington Museum) 1504 Made in 1696 by a silversmith named Martin, of Cork, for the Gilds of that city, hut not bought by thorn, owing to a disinite about the price. The head is given here to show that in the time of Ireland's deepest desolation the Irish metal workers had yet lost nothing of the artistic feeling and manual skill which had characterised their race from the very beginning of its history. \\u.\.\'\'s\\\\. \sV\KLi\yniWV {from an engraving by A'omeynde JJooge) . . . . 1506 VOL. IV -.2 Ixxxviii NOTES OX THK ILLUSTRATIONS TACE NONCONFOKMIST ClIAlKI., DeAN KoW, CHESHIRE {Eancakcr, "East Cfu-shire") 1508 Probablv the oldest Nonconformist Cliajicl in tlie huntlred of MacclesfieUl. It was built <■. 1693, for a I'resbylerian Congregation, whose minister was Eliezcr Birch. It is now useil by a congregation of Unitarians. 'YllV.^Ol.V.n.\\o\\V iC/iariwc/c, '' History of Marine AnhiUdine") 1510 The finest ship of the navy of Louis XI\'., or of any navy in its day ; built in 1690 ; carried 104 guns, and lOOO men. It was Tourville"s flagship at La llogue, and was burnt at Cherbourg by Admiral Delaval. Medal COMMEMORATING Restoration OF Charters TO Towns, 1690 . . . 1512 In January, 1690, a bill was passed to restore the rights of all towns which liad lost their charters under Charles and James. As the inscription on the revei-se of the medal says, " Privileges are restored, liberty revived." Y.isw.Kicv. F^osi THV. ^v.\ {dra-cing c. i6%S, ill Bn'tish Miiseiiiii) 1513 Carrickkergus (r/rrtTt'/w^'-c. 16^0, in British Museum) 151 3 Armoi-r WORN BY James IL AT THE BoYNE (71;T(ytv-^/Z///(7/. /;////) 1518 The B.attle of La Hogue (from an engraving by Romeyn de Hooge) . . . . 1520 Medal commemorating Victory at La Hogue (reverse) 1521 William's reply to Louis's medal for Beachy Head (see above, and p. 15 1 7). William, as Neptune, drives away Louis, the pseudo-Neptune, with his trident, saying "To me it" \i.e., the empire of the seas] "is given by Late" "The offences committed are expiated by a like punishment." Robert Spencer, second Earl of Sunderland {from an engraving by K. Cooper of a picture by Carlo Maratta at Alt horpc) 1524 Medal commemorating the Storming of Toubocan, 1700 1527 A gold medal, given by the African Company of Scotland as a reward to Alexander Campbell, who, at the head of 200 men whom he had commanded in Flanders, drove 1,600 Spaniards from their entrenchments at Toubocan on the Isthmus of Darien, and thus for a time delivered the Scottish settlers from danger. The obverse represents a Highlander scaling a fortress, with the words: " What not for our country?" "Toubocan, where Captain Alex- ander Campbell defeated 1,600 .Spaniards, 8th February, 1700." The reverse bears the shield of the African and Indian Company of Scotland, with the legend : " Whithersoever the world extends. Strength united is stronger." The Mint, Bristol [Seyer, " Memorials of Bristol") 1528 In 1696 a new coinage was ordered. A tax was laid upon windows to defray its expenses ; and in order that it might be the sooner ready, mints were set up at Chester, York, Bristol and Exeter. At Bristol a " sugar-house "' behind S. Peter's Church was bought and fitted up for the ]iurpose ; ^450,000 was coined there in 1696-7 ; then the house was bouglit by the Guardians of the Poor, "therein to employ the poor and youth of this city in spinning and weaving cotton."' Thenceforth its proper title w^as S. Peter's Hospital, but its older name of the Mint still clung to it in popular speech in the early years of the present century. Maklbokovgu {drawing by A'neller, in Britis/i Museum) I530 Silver Call-Whistle • 1531 Used to summon a household before the introduction of bells. This whistle is English work of the 17th century ; it was dug out of a hedgerow at Reigate in 1854, and it is the property of Lord Zouche, by whose kind permission it is reproduced here. NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE Medal commemorating First Partition Treaty 1533 The enclosure in which hangs the Ciolden Fleece is guarded by a dragon, representing William III. ; legend, "Watchful, he disappoints the greedy one." On the reverse, William, Lewis, and three other allies join hands over an altar inscribed, "to J"piter, guardian of boundaries;" the legend runs, " Agreement of sovereigns for public safety. " Dutch Guards, TEMP. William III 1534 From an engraving by Romeyn de Hooge, in " Relation du \'oyage de S. M. le roi d'Angleterre en Hollande," the Hague, 1692. These foot-soldiers are armed with muskets ; the collar of bandoliers, or little cylinders containing charo-es of powder, may be seen suspended from the shoulder. William's Blue Guards marched across St. James's Park with lighted matches to take possession of St. James's Palace, December 17th, 1688. :Medal commemorating Homage of Duke of Lorraine to Lewis XIV. 1699 (reverse) 1535 Medal commemorating offer of the Crown of Spain to the Duke of Anjou, 1700 (reverse) 1535 Satirical Playing-Card {British Museum) 1536 One of a pack designed under Queen Anne. The Duke of Anjou is repre- sented stealing the Spanish Crown. John Dryden {picture by Sir G. Kneller) 1537 Sophia, Electress of Hanover 1539 Reverse of a medal struck in commemoration of the Act of Settlement, 1701. The obverse bears another female head, meant to represent ^Matilda, Duchess of Saxony, daughter of Heniy II., through whom the Electors of Hanover were descended from the old royal house of England. Ensign John Churchill (afterwards Duke of Marlborough) .... 1540 From an engraving (in the British Museum) thus inscribed: "Mr de Marleborough tel qu'il etait en 1668, quand il servait en qualite d'enseigne dans le Regiment des Gardes francaises. Grave d'apres Van der Meulen." John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough {picture by J. Closterman in National Portrait Gallery) 1542 Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough {picture by Sir G. Kneller, in N'alional Portrait Gallery) 1543 Memorial of William III. {British Museum) 1544 An unique gold medal, formerly in the possession of the Scott family, of Ballingarry, co. Tipperary, to whose ancestor land was granted in Ireland for his services at the Boyne. The obverse, which bears a portrait of William, is cast and chased ; the reverse, representing the Irish harp and some military emblems, is engraved. S.atirical Playing-Card 1547 A satire on Marlborough's known avarice and alleged peculations ; one of the same pack as the card given in p. 1536. Running Footmen 1548 Reproduced for the first time, by kind permission of the Duke of Marlborough, from tapestry at Blenheim Palace, made for the first Duke. This illustration and that on p. 1552 are taken from the tapestry which represents the battle of Blenheim. The figures of the footmen who ran in front of the carriage are of special interest as features of domestic life, as no similar figures occur in pictures of the time. Eugene and Marlborough reconnoitring {from an engraving by Camsvelt) . 1549 The Battle of Hochstadt {from an cti^ravino by J. van Huchtenhjtrg) . . . 1550 Surrender of Marshal Tallard {repi-odnced for the first time from tapestry at Blenheim Palace) 1552 "Mai.horouk" 1554 From a broadside in the Bibliotheque Nationaie in Paris. This illustration of the French popular .song " Malborouk s'en va-t-en guerre," dating from the early jiart of the present century, witnesses to the persistence of the Marlborough legend, vol. IV 33 NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS PACE Chaklks Mordaunt, Earl of Peterborough (jioiu a nuzzolint l>yj. Simon of a picture by M. Dahl) 1557 Medai, COMMEMORATING Victory OF Ramillies 1558 A verv rare bronze medal ; reiJroduced here from an engraving in the Mdallic' History of Williain III., Anne, &c., published in 1747, to illustrate Rapin's History of Etii^land. The obverse represents the victory— "French, Bavarians, and' Spaniards captured, destroyed, or put to flight all in one battle at Ramillies, 1706 ' ; round the edge is written : " May 23. Ill-gotten gains are not enjoyed by the third generation." The reverse represents "Brabant and Flanders restored to their lawful ruler by the alliance of l-:ngland and Holland." The encircling legend runs: " They shine with stainless honours. Under this commander I preserve my country ; with him" \i.£. Marlborough] " for my leader, I maintain the King."' Secono Gre.\t Seal of Anne, 1707 1560, 1561 The first seal of Great Britain. On the obverse is the Queen enthroned, with the emblems of her three kingdoms ; on the reverse, the union just accomplished between two of them is commemorated in a wholly new design, the figure of Britannia. Joseph XXiXASO"^ {picture by Sir Godfrey Kneller) 1563 Addison entered the Ministry in 1706 as Under Secretary of Stale. In 1709 he became Secretary to Lord Wharton, when the latter was Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland ^see p. 1565). He was also made Keeper of the Records, but lost his office at the fall of the Whig Ministry in 1710. English Squadron carrying Troops to take possession of Dunkirk (^' History of Queen Anne,'' 1740) 1564 The Battle of Malplaquet (/;w« ///6' j-aw^) 1566 Designs for Pl.aying-cards, 1710 {British Museum) 1567, 1568, 1569 From a sheet of designs for twenty-six cards, evidently made in 1710. The first card here reproduced shows Sacheverell in his coach and the crowd cheering him ; the second represents the newly-elected members for London addressing their constituents in the Guildhall ; in the third the Queen is receiving an address from the new Parliament which met in November 17 10. Henry St. John, Viscount Bolingbroke {picture by R'neller, at Petiuorth) . 1571 Robert Harley, Earl of Oxford {from an engraving by J. van Huchten- burg) 1572 Emblems of the Silyersmiths' Craft, c. 1700 {Bagford Collection, British J\Iuseum) 1573 By Robert While, who died 1704. Invitation to a Meeting of the Goldsmiths' Company, i'jot (same collec- tion) 1574 Advertisement of John Marshall, Optician, 1694 {same collection) . . . 1575 Advertisement of John Heaton, i'jo() {Crowle collectiot, British Mtiseum) . 15 76 John Heaton was a maker of agricultural implements. The curiosity of his advertisement consists in its having been printed on the fro«en Thames, like the picture of " Frost Fair " in 1683, given in p. 1430. Printing-office, c. 1710 {Bagford Collection) 1577 Cries of London, 168S — 1702 1578, 1579, 1580, 15S1 From Cryes of the City of London, engraved by Pierce Tempest from drawings by Marcellus Lauron (or Laroon) the elder, who died in 1702. The first edition was published in 1688; the British Museum copy, from which these reproductions are made, dates from 171 1. Sir Robert W.-M.poLE (picture by J. B. van Loo, in N'ational Portrait Gallery) 1583 The Six. Lords Pleading in Westminster Hali 1585 Lord Nithsdale's Escape 15S6 These two illusirations are parts of a contemporary broadsheet, representing the events of the Jacobite rising in 1715-16. The six lords — Derwentwater, NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE Nithsdale, Carnwath, Kenmure, Widdrington, and Nairne — who surrendered at Preston in November 1715 (see p. 1586), were impeached in Parliament, and condemned to death in February 1716. Derwentwater and Kenmure were beheaded, February 24 ; Nithsdale's wife visited him in prison on the previous night, changed clothes with him, and thus effected his escape. Cries OF London (Tfw/^^^a?/^/ Za«;w/, 16S8— 1702) . . . .1587,1588, 15S9, 1590 Trade Label OF THE South Sea Company ( CmVtjMa// yI///5«/;«) 1591 MEn.\i. Commemorating THE Siege OF Gibraltar, 1727 1593 A very rare bronze medal. Obverse: "Gibraltar besieged, 22nd Febr., 1727. To conquer or to die." Reverse : " But there is given a third course, less perilous — to go away " ; a sarcastic allusion to the withdrawal of the Spanish besiegers (see p. i594)- Jonathan Swift, Dean of S. Patrick's, Dublin [from an engraving by E . Scriven, after F. Bincion) 1595 Auv.xxr^DV.v. VovE {picture at Chiswick Honse) 1596 The House of Commons in Walpole's Administration (from A. Fagg's en- graving of a picture by Hogarth and Thornhill) 159^ The chief persons represented are Walpole, Speaker Onslow, Sydney Godolphin, Sir Joseph Jekyll, Colonel Onslow, Edward Stables (clerk of the House), Sir James ThoVnhill (the painter), and Mr. Aiskew (clerk-assistant). " In Place " (j-a/mVrt//rz«/, 1738, in British JlTicseum) 1600 The age-of political caricature began in England under (jeorge H. , and instead of the half-emblematical satires, chiefly Dutch, which were common in the preceding century, we now have a series of real caricatures by English artists. After the Revolution of 1688, the progress of the art of engraving made possible the effective production of caricatures, and from the time ot George IL a number of artists were actively employed in satirizing political intrigues. Walpole is here represented turning away from Jenkins, who shows his severed ear (see p. 1601). Opposite Walpole sits a lady (probably his wife) receiving a box of jewels from a Frenchman (an allusion to Walpole's alleged secret intelligence with France). In the foreground a man burns a number of The Craftsman in which Walpole's Bill for licensing the stage had been attacked. A courtier pushes away a merchant holding a memorial on " Spanish Depredations," and a pet dog tears the " Merchants' Complaint." In the next room a man pours " ^10,000 " through a gridiron into the " Sink- ing F'und "; and in the distance, through the open door, an English ship is seen defeated by a Spanish one. "The Motion" (5rt//V7Va:/ /;-«■«/, 1741) 1602 Inside the coach, crying, "Let me get out, " is Lord Carteret, who had moved in the Lords a resolution "that Sir R. Walpole should be dismissed from his Majesty's presence and councils for ever." The driver is the Duke of Argyll, represented with a flaming sword for a whip, because he had supported the motion with such vehemence that his speech alarmed his own party, and nearly defeated its own object. Between his feet is a dog, " Bub." i.e., Bubb Doddington, an obsequious follower of the Duke. The postillion is Lord Chesterfield, the footman Lord Cobham. The bishop who bows to the car- riage is Smalbroke, of Lichfield. The man dropping the " Place Bill " is Mr. Sandys ; he had introduced in the Commons a motion for removing Walpole, and he here seems to ascribe its failure to the rash violence of Argyll. Pulteney, the leader of the Opposition, is seen leading his followers by the nose. Medal Commemorating Capture of Portobello, 1739 1603 AciioN at Carthagena (ew^Taz//;/^, \iiif\,from dra-iving by H. Gravelot) . . 1604 Si a 1 1. Lotterv, X^-y) (contemporary print in British JMuseum) 1606 .V Slate Lottery, the earliest of a long series, was set on foot by Act of Parliament in 1737, to raise money for building a liridgeat Westminster. The drawing of the lots began on lOlh December, 1739, in Stationers' Hall ; the hall here rei)rcsented, however, appears to be the Guildhall. The Govern- voi,. IV 34 NOTES Ox\ TPIK ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE nient commissioners superintending the lottery sit at the table on the platform. Behind them are two closed lottery-wheels, under the table is a wheel in use ; four secretaries sit at a lower table. According to a practice which became usual, the lots are being drawn by boys of the Blue-Coat School. Chained Library, All Saints Chi'rch, Hkkkford {Blades, '■'■Bibliographical Miscellanies") 1607 Interesting as the latest example of a ciiained library. The books (285 volumes) were bequeathed to the parish by Dr. W. Brewster in 1715 ; they fill three shelves along two sides of the vestry. The chains were evidently copied from those in the neighbouring cathedral library. The Vicar of the Parish Receiving His Tithes 1608 The Curate OF THE Tarish RETURNING FROM Duty 1609 From engravings, 1793, by T. Burke, after pictures by H. Singleton. 'R-e.X'DlSG VooK-novs-E {Coates, " History of Reading") 1610 Built in 1727. Y KO'SIV. ?>CHOOi. A'S'D'BY^iDO'E{dra7uing ill Brilish Museum) 161 1 This school was built in 1720. Dean Berkeley, his Wife, and Fellow-missionaries {picture at Yale College) 1612 In 1728 George Berkeley (then Dean of Derry, afterwards Bishop of Cloync) sailed with his wife, her friend Miss Handcock, Sir Jjimef Dalton, Mr. John Tames, and Mr. John Smybert, to found a missionary college in America. Bermuda was the place fixed upon, but the home government failed to give Berkeley the support which it had promised him, and three years later he went back again, having never got further than Rhode Island. It was there that Smybert painted this picture. Berkeley stands on the spectator's right ; next him sits his wife with one of their children in her lap ; beside her sits Miss Handcock ; James stands behind them ; Dalton is seated at the table, writ- ing ; behind him stands Mr. Moffat, a friend of Smybert's, and furthest to the left is Smybert himself. GzORGEWniT'EFiEl.T) {picture dj'JVat/ianiel JPofie) 1613 John Wesley {picture by William Hamilton^ in the National Portrait Gallery) . 1615 School (yV^w T. Faber's engraving of a pictu7-e, 1739, by P. Mercier) 1617 The subject of this picture is English, although the stj-le of treatment is French. Philippe Mercier w-as a Frenchman by birth, but he lived and worked in England. Samuel Johnson {from an engraving by Findcu) 1618 Hannah More (picittre by Opie, 1786) 1619 John Howard {picture by Mather Bro-wn, in the National Portrait Gallery) . . 1620 Medal Commemorating Battle of Dettingen 1622, 1623 Piper in Highland Regiment (6^;w^, '■'■ Military Antiqztilies") 1625 Soldiers i.n Highland Regiment (/;w« ^/^,^ .raw^) 1626 Medal Commemorating Battle of Culloden 1627 Fort William {old print in British Museum) 1628 The Mogul Emperors {miniature at Windsor Castle) 1630 .\ French Canadian {Bacqueville de la Potherie, " Histoire de VAmerique septentrionale," 1722) 1632 The inscription in the corner explains that this man is "going out over the snow to war." "Habitation de l'ile Ste. Ckoix '' {Champlain, " J'oyages," 1613) .... 1633 This "habitation," founded in 1604, was the earliest French settlement in Acadie. The island, now called Douchet, lies at the mouth of the river Ste. -Croix. Frederick II., King of Prussia and Elector of Brandenburg {from an engraving in the Bibliothique Nationale, Paris) 1635 NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS I'AGE Greenwich Hospital i6j5 The English kings had long had a residence at Greenwich when Charles II., in 1664, resolved to build there a new palace, which was begun by Inigo Jones, but never completed. James II. wished to convert the building into a hospital for disabled seamen ; Mary eagerly desired to commemorate the great victory of La Hogue (1692) by carrying out her father's project, and after her death (1694) William took it up no less eagerly as a memorial of her. Wren drew the plans and superintended the work without charge, saying, "Let me have some share in a work of mercy. " His designs were hampered by the necessity of adapting them to the existing work of Inigo Jones, which Mary had desired to retain untouched ; but the result was a triumph of Wren's genius. The effect of the whole group of buildings, seen from the river, is extremely fine, and it evidently formed in Wren's mind part of a grand scheme for giving a worthy approach to the capital, where he was already embellishing the Tower and erecting the new cathedral of S. Paul's, and which he had proposed to rebuild entirely according to a design still in existence, though never carried into execution. The view here given shows the hospital as Wren left it, with the road originally reserved from the Thames up to the " Queen's House " (at the rear ot the hospital), built by Inigo Jones for Anne of Denmark and Henrietta Maria. King Charles's building forms the west wing ; behind it is " King William's building," erected 1696-8 ; opposite to this is "Queen Mary's building," begun in 1702, finished in 1752. The east wing (fronting Charles's building) is known as "Queen Anne's building," and was begun in 1698, but not completed till after Anne's death ; it was here that Admiral Byng was confined after his disgrace in 1756 (see p. 1635). Ax Election Entertainment, 1755 {picture by W. Hogarth) 163S William Vitt {pkiitre by Hoare) 163^ Sword-Bearer and Mace-Bearer of the City of London {map of London, 1726, in Grace collection, British Aluseuiii) \6±\ Mardol Street, Shrewsbury {Owen and Blakeway, "History of Shrcivs- Intry") 1642 A good example of the houses which the "great middle class " in the coun- try towns were beginning to build for themselves in Pitt's time. TowN-HALL, Carlisle (A'/zZ/iT, " Carlisle in the Olden Time") 1643 From a drawing c. 1780 ; showing the Mayor's procession. The hall itself was built in the reign of Elizabeth. William Pitt, Earl of Chatham {picture by Richard Brompton, in the possession of Ea7-l Stanhope, at Chevening) 1645 Surajah Dowlah {miniature in the India Museum) 1647 Medal commkmorating Battle of Plassey 164S A Society for promoting Arts and Commerce, founded in 1754, caused medals to be struck on various occasions, as an encouragement to art. The first of these was the medal here reproduced, struck by Thomas Pingo in 1758. Medal commemorating Battles of Rossbach and Leutiien 1649 A brass medal, illustrating English feeling towards Frederick and Maria Theresa. The obverse hears a head of Frederick ; on the reverse he brandishes his sword over the head of the kneeling queen. Medal commemorating the Battle of Minden 1650 A rare brass rnedal. The obverse represents the opening of the Ixattle by an attack on the village of Dodenhausen ; the reverse shows the victor, Prince Ferdinand of Brunswick-Wolfcnbiittel, on horseback, with his camp in the background, "A View of the City of Quebec in New France in .Vmerica" ... 1651 From a drawing signed " .Margaret Cecil, 1740," in the British Museum; interesting as the work of an Englishwoman who had somehow visited Quebec while it was still in French hands. VOL. IV 35 NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE Medal commemorating the Cavture oe Louisburg and Cape Breton . 1652 Brass ; rare, because of inferior workmanship, and thought at the time not worth preserving. The design is, however, more interesting than those of some much finer medals issued on the same occasion, as the one side liears a head of Achniral Boscawen and the oilier a curious little view of Louisburg harbour and fort. G%yi'EV.\i. V\0\.ve. (/>ii(iirc by Si/iaal; in National Poiimit Galloy) 1653 The Capture ok Quebec {contemporary print) 1654 Medal commemorating Successes of 1759 1655 Bronze ; an illustration of the feeling towards Pitt. The reversed lily symbolizes the defeat of France ; the lion and the horse are the emblems of England and Hanover ; the list of the year's triumphs, with the names of the victorious commanders, is grouped around the name of the leader to whom all these successes were ascribed, "William Pitt, Prime Minister, under the auspices of George II." Fight between the "Centurion" and a Manilla .Ship {Harris's " J'oyax'fs") 1656 In 1740 an English squadron commanded by George Anson was sent to attack the Sjianiarcls in the South Seas. It sailed round the world ; one of the great exploits of the expedition was the fight which took place off Macao, 21st June, 1743, between Anson in the "Centurion" and the great Spanish ship which traded between Manilla and Acapuico, and which was captured by Anson. North American Traders and Indians [Gauthicr and Faden's Map of Canada, 1777) 1657 Shah Allum, Mogul of IIindostan, reviewing East India Company's Troops 1658 From a picture painted in India in 1781, for Sir Robert Barker, by Tilly Kettle ; now in the possession of Mr. Robert Webb, who has kindly allowed it to be reproduced for the first time here. The Mogul is reviewing the third brigade of the Company's troops, from a state tent, on the plain of Allahabad ; an officer of Sepoys is explaining to him the manceuvres. Captain Cook {from Shenvit^s engraving, \']'&i^, of a picture by N. Dance) . . 1660 Map of the Colonies of North America at the Declaration of Independence to face 1661 William Penn {picture in National Museum, rhiladelphia) 1661 Pine-tree Shilling of Massachusetts 1662 In 1652 Massachusetts set up at Boston a mint of its own, which issued coins bearing for device an American pine tree. Charles II. on his restoration was very angry at this infringement of his royal prerogative, but Sir William Temple appeased his wrath by assuring him that the tree was meant for the Royal Oak, and thus symbolized the loyalty of Massachusetts at a time when England itself was in rebellion. New Amsterdam (N.J. Visschers Map of New England and Neiv Belgium, mid 17 Century) 1 652 New Amsterdam was the original name of the town which, when transferred to British rule, became New York (see p. 1661). •"A Prospect of the Colledges at Cambridge in New England" {American print, c. 1739) 1663 These are the three old halls of Harvard College, Cambridge, Massachusetts. On the left is the original Harvard Hall, founded by John Harvard in 1650 and completed in 1675 j ^^^ middle building is Stoughton Hall, founded by William Stoughton in 1699; on the right is Massachusetts Hall, added in 1720. George III. {picture by Allan liamsay, in National Portrait Gallery) 1666 Sr.ATE Coach (built 1762) of George III. {South Kensington Museum) . . 1667 Frederick the Great {print in Bibliothique Nationale, Paris) 1669 NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS xcv PAGE The Tschudi Family 1670 Burkhardt Tschudi, of an old Swiss family, came to England in 1718, and founded in 1732 the famous business of J. Broadwood and Sons, the oldest business devoted to key-board instruments in the world, and the oldest of any kind in England that is still carried on in the very house where it was first started. That house, known in Tschudi's time by its sign of " The Plume of f^eathers " (adopted under the patronage of the then Prince of Wales), is now No. 33 Great Pulteney Street, the piano factory of Messrs. Broadwood. The picture here reproduced belongs to Mr. J- H. Tschudi Broadwood, Tschudi's great-great-grandson, who has kindly allowed it to be photographed for this Dock. The painter is unknown. The group consists of Tschudi, his wife and his two sons, one of whom continued the business in partnership with his brother-in-law, John Broadwood. The harpsichord Tschudi is tuning was presented by him to Frederick the Great in 1 744-5, after the battle of Prague (see p. 1623), when Frederick became the Protestants' great hero, Tschudi being a zealous Protestant. Mr. A. J. Hipkins, the writer of the articles on key-board instruments in the Dictionary of I\Ii(sic, has been unable to discover this harpsichord in Berlin or Potsdam, but he there identified two other harpsichords which Frederick purchased from Tschudi in 1766 for his new palace at Potsdam. In 1773, the last year of Tschudi's life, a harpsichord made by his firm was presented by the Prussian King to Maria Theresa, and another to the Empress Elizabeth of Russia, as tokens of reconciliation ; these Empresses, with ISIadame de Pompadour, had been Frederick's great enemies, and as such he had set their statues on the facade of his Potsdam palace. The Mansion House, London 1673 This and the next two illustrations are from pictures by Samuel Scott, c. 1750, in the Guildhall Art Gallery. London Bridge and Dyers' Wharf 1674 The Fleet River 1675 *• The City Chanters" {from an engraving by S. Okey, 1775, i^f '^ pictit7-e by John Collett) 1 679 An illustration of the " Wilkes and Liberty " excitement. Benjamin Franklin {Medallion by Nini, in the National Portrait Gallery) . . 1681 British Stamps for America {Harper's Magazine) 1682 '^■DSWy.Vi'Qv&.V.Y. {picture by Reynolds, in National Portrait Gallery) 1683 Satirical Sketch of Burke, by Sayer, 1782 1684 " The Astonishing Coalition— neither War nor Peace" 1685 A satirical but characteristic sketch by James Gillray, the great caricaturist of this period. The occasion of the sketch was the union of Burke and Fox with Lord North, to whom they had been opposed, in denouncing the Shel- burne ministry of 1783, which their coalition brought to ruin. This .and the preceding drawing are given to illustrate the effect produced by Burke's vehement and impassioned manner. Wilkes before the Court of King's Bench {Gentle/nan's Magazine, 1768) . 1688 Frontispiece to the Middlesex Petition, 1769 1690 The petition was from 1565 freeholders of Middlesex, protesting against the " despotic counsellors" to whom was attributed the violation of constitutional rights in the matter of Wilkes's election. The frontispiece, here reproduced from a copy in the British Museum, represents a deputation presenting the petition to the king. William Beckford [monument in Guildhall, London) 1691 The inscription below the statue is as follows :— " William Beckford, Esq., twice Lord Mayor. His speech to His Majesty King George HL on the 23rd of ^L^y, 1770. " ' Most Gracious Sovereign,— Will your Majesty be pleased so far to con- descend as to permit the Mayor of your loyal City of London to declare in your Royal Presence, on behalf of'his I'\-llow Citizens, how much the liare apprehension of your Majesty's displeasure would at all times affect their minds. The declaration of that displeasure has already filled them with inex- pressible anxiety, and with the deepest affliction. Permit me, Sire, to assure VOL. IV 36 NOTES OX Tin: ILLUSTRATIONS I- AGE your Majesty that your Majesty has not in all your dominions any subjects more faithful, more dutiful, or more affectionate to your Majesty's person and family, or more ready to sacrifice their lives and fortunes in the maintenance of the true honour and dignity of your Crown. We do therefore, with the greatest humility and submission, most earnestly supplicate your Majesty that you will not dismiss us from your presence, without expressing a more favour- able opinion of your faitliful Citizens, and without some comfort, some pro- spect at least, of redress. Permit me. Sire, farther to observe, that whoever has already dared or shall hereafter endeavour by false insinuations and sug- gestions to alienate your Majesty's affections from your loyal subjects in general, and from the City of London in particular, and to withdraw your confidence in, antl regard for your people is an enemy to your Majesty's Person and Family, a violator of the public peace, and a betrayer of our happy constitution as it was established at the glorious Revolution." " AVo\ATiciAT<" (afit:)- IF. I/o,^ari/i) .• • • ""^93 Hogarth is said to have here caricatured a Mr. Tibson, a laceman in the Strand, well known in his day for his keen interest in politics. The picture marks the growth of journals, mentioned in the text, and the popular interest excited by them. "Exact Draught of Boston Harbour" [dracuing, 1733, in British Museum) 1694 Landi.ng of British Troops at Boston, 1768 {contemporary engraving by Paul Revere) 1695 George Washington {picture by Gilbert Stjcart, in possession of the Earl of Rosebery) ■ • 1698 An American Rifleman "1 , ^ „ ,,,,,. ^^ , ,,, y{E. Barnard, ^^ History of England, il^o) ... 1700 An American General J Fight of Bunker's Hill and Burning of Charlestown {from the same) . . 1701 Medal commemorating Washington's Capture of Boston {British Museum) 1 702 Several medals in honour of Washington and American Independence were struck in 1 789 at the Royal Mint of Paris ; ]iossil)ly owing to the influence of Lafayette, who had returned from America in 1783. The reverse of the finest of these medals is figured here. It represents Washington, surrounded by his officers, watching from a distance the evacuation of Boston by the English: "The enemies first put to flight- — Boston recovered, 17 March 1776." On a cannon to the right is the engraver's signature, "Duviv.," i.e. Benjamin Duvivier, chief engraver to the Royal Mint of France. The obverse bears a fine portrait of Washington, with the inscription, "To George Washington, commander-in-chief, assertor of liberty — American Congress." "Duvivier, Paris, f." Medal commemorating Declaration of American Independence (5;wwfl'6'«, " Medallic Memorials of JVashington)" 1703 A medal designed and engraved by C. C. Wright. The obverse bears the head of Washington ; there are two reverses ; one consists of a tablet on which are inscribed the chief events of American history, from the " Discovery of North America by the English, July 3, 1497 " to the " Assault on Quebec by the Americans, December 31, 1775 ;" the other, here figured, is copied from a picture by Colonel Trumbull of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The Liberty Bell, Philadelphia {Lossing, " Cyclopcedia of United States History'') 1704 In 1751 the State House at Philadelphia (built 1720-44) received the addition of a tower and belfiy, for which the Assembly of Pennsylvania ordered "a good bell of about 2000 lbs. weight" to be cast in England, and inscribed with these w^ords : " Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof" (Levit. xxv. 10). The bell was cast in London and sent over, but cracked on first trial. Pass and Stow, bell-founders at Philadelphia, re-cast it twice, and it was finally hung in its place on June 7, 1753. Its sound was the first ])roclamation of the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. In September 1777 it was taken down and NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS VAGR removed to Allentown to save it from falling into the hands of the British when Philadelphia was abandoned to them ; the seizure of bells as spoils of war, and their employment for casting cannon-balls, being a recognised military privilege. In 1778 the bell was restored to its place. In 1835 it cracked, and is now preserved as a relic. The Death of Chatham {picture by /. S. Copley, 1779, in the National Gallery) I706 Robert, Lord Clive {from Bartolozzfs engraving of a picture by N'. Dance) . 1708 Warren Hastings {from a mezzotint by T. Watson, 1777, of a picture by Reynolds) 1710 Surrender of Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown {Barnard, ''History of England," \'j(iO) '7I3 The Parliament House, DxjBi.iyi (from a photograph) 17 14 Built in 1782 for the Independent Parliament of Ireland ; now used as the Bank of Ireland. Admiral '^oviS-ex {from an engraving by E. Scriven of a picture by Reynolds) . 1715 The Relief of Gibraltar {European Magazine, 1782) 1716 The " Discovery " {Lindsay, ''History of Merchant Shipping," from a drawing by E. W. Cook, R.A.) • • • • "717 The ship which, under the command of Captain Clarke, accompanied Cook in his last voyage. When this drawing was made she was being used as a coaling-vesseLat Newcastle ; hence the addition of the steam-funnels. "The Impeachment— The Father of the Gang turned King's Y.xi- UEI^iCY." {after Gillray) 1718 A satire upon Burke's separation from the Tories in May, 1791 (see p. 1753). Fox, Sheridan, and their party regarded themselves as Burke's disciples, and now represented him as turning against and impeaching his own political children. Postage-.stamp, Newfoundland ■ 1718 Postage-stamp, Canada 1718 Seal of Cape Colony, Eastern Dixisio's {collection of Afr. Allan JVyoti) . 1719 Seal of Natal {same collection) 17 '9 Postage-stamp, New South Wales 1719 Postage-stamp, Tas.mania • 1719 Each of these stamps and seals bears a device typical of the colony to which it belongs. Newfoundland is represented on its stamp by a seal, Canada by a beaver ; on the Cape seal is figured a native with spear and shield, on that of Natal the gnu, a species of antelope peculiar to South Africa ; New South Wales places on its stamp the lyre-bird indigenous to its woods, and Tas- mania's emblem is the singular animal known as platypus or ornithorhynchus, which is found nowhere else. The stamp of New South Wales here repro- duced belongs to a Centenary issue, designed to commemorate the hundredth year from the foundation of this colony, in 1788. William Vvvt {picture by Gainsborough) 1720 Charles James Fox (picture by Karl Anton Hickel, in National Portrait Gallery)' I7-' Front of the Old East India House 1723 This illustration, kindly lent by Mr. F. C. Danvers from his paper on "India (Jflice Records," represents the original headquart-ers of the East India Company in Leadenhall .Street. The escutcheon with the royal arms and Elizabeth's motto, "Semper Eadem," shows that the facade was coeval with the incorporation of the Company in 1600. The carved woodwork and latticed windows may be compared with those of the contemj)orary house of Sir Paul Pindar, engraved in j). 988. The design of the frieze .seems to be a bold and free development of the Company's arms, figured in p. 990 ; it dis- plays the ships, but increased in number from three to seven ; the sea-lions again appear as supporters, though here with their heads downwards ; while VOL. IV 37 xcviii NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS FACE the figure at the top doubtless represents a merchant adventurer with his staff in his hand. The house was pulled down and rebuilt in 1726; to this new building, again, a front was added in 1799 ; finally, the Company having been dissolved on the transfer of India to the Crown in 1S58, the house was entirely demolished in 1862. A View of Bombay Grkkx in 1767 {Forbes, '■'■ Oriental Memoirs'''') .... 1724 From a drawing made by one of the Company's writers of what he saw from his apartment at the Bunder; viz. part of Government House, the English church, the Secretary's office, the residence of the Second in Council, all interesting for the style of architecture ; while the daily life of the place is illustrated by the groups on the green, the official f'nglish coach with liveried servants after the fashion of London, the Company's troops, the palanquin, the Bengal chair, and the hackeree drawn by a white Indian ox. The House ok Co.mmons in 1793 {picture by Karl Anton Hiikel, in the National Gallery) bet-ween f p. 1726 and 1 727 Waggon (/^'//(f, '' Costumes of Great Britain " 1808) 172S Illustrates " the want of a cheap and easy means of transport " for goods, as mentioned in the te.xt. Aqueduct over the Irwell at Barton, Lancashire {^^ drawn and engraved by W. Orme, 1793") '729 Weaving at Spitalfields (ZT^^ar/A, '^ Industry and Idleness'''') 1730 James V^ att {picture by Sir T. Lawrence) 1731 Sasivev Ckosivto'S {picture by Alling/iam) 1732 Richard Arkwright {picture by Joseph Wright of Derby, in the possession of Mr. P. A. Hurt) i733 Adam Synin (from engraving by Holl of a medallion by Tassie) 1734 Token of John WiLKiiSiSoyi {IF. Bazohes Smith, "Birmingham") 1735 John Wilkinson, ironmaster at Bradley, near Wre.xham, made the first castings for Boulton and Watt, before they set up their own foundry in Soho. Colliery-work (/^«^, " Microcosmf 1803-6) 1735 Iron-foundry (/ww //^^ 5«;«e) 1736 Casting Cannon-balls (/ww //^^ ^awe) .... 1737 'Y-A^'L\y.Y.y.\\\\A.,V)\5'&V.\'^ {from engraving by W. Hincks,\1^-^ 1738 Bas-relief IN Wedgwood Ware 1739 Potteiy, now so universally used for all purposes of utility .and ornament, was unknown, except to the wealthy, in the beginning of last century. Its place was taken for domestic purposes by wood, pewter or horn. The change was effected by Josiah Wedgwood (1738 — 1795), who, in the words on his monu- ment in Stoke Church, "converted a rude and inconsiderable manufactory into an elegant art, and an important part of national commerce." Born in the humblest class, he set himself to improve upon the imperfect ware then sparsely employed in domestic use, and, by means of experiments of a very enterprising character in the then state of chemical knowledge, achieved the production of earthenware, substantially such as we have it now, and called by him Queen's Ware. The practical benefit to the community of such a new ajipear- ance among the commodities of daily life can hardly be over-estimated, but the invention with which his name is more particularly connected is that of the material he called Jasper ; a fine semi-vitreous unglazed body, coloured in severely quiet tones, and decorated with white bas-reliefs. In this form of pottery he developed a branch of art deriving its inspiration from classic Greece, though not directly imitative. It is peculiar in being entirely the work of the potter, without aid from painter or gilder, and appeals to educated taste by the beauty of its form, and the perfection combined with simplicity of its execution. In its production he was assisted by the refined taste of 15enlley and the genius of I'laxman. The engraving here reproduced is kindly lent by Mr. Godfrey Wedgwood. It represents Mercury, as the god of commerce, ioining the hands of England and France. This bas-relief was modelled by Flaxman in 1787, to commemorate the negotiation of the commercial treaty with France in that year. NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE. The " Fourteen Stars " Tavern, Bristol {old drawing in British Mitsettni) 1 741 This tavern, which stood at the end of Tucker Street, was a favourite resort of the sea-captains who traded with the Guinea coast. Clarkson frequently visited it in order to obtain from these men information about the slave- trade. William WiLBERFORCE (/«^««;«c«/ z« Westminster Abbey) 1742 The Fruit Barrow {from an engraving by J. Raphael Smith after H. Walton) . 1743 A good illustration of children's dress in the latter half of the eighteenth century. Itinerant Trades of London i743, i744. i745- 1746 Drawn by Francis Wheatley, engraved by Schiavonetti, Cardon, and Vendramini, 1794 — 5. Medal Commemorating THE Capture OF THE Bastille, 1789 1747 Medal Commemorating THE King's Entry into Paris, 1789 1749 Medal Commemorating THE General Confederation, 1790 1750 "The Tree of Liberty, ^VITH the Devil Tempting John Bull," {satire by Gillray, 179S) 1754 The serpent is Fox, tempting John Bull to taste the fruit of the "tree of liberty,"?.^., of revolution : " Nice apple, Johnny! nice apple!" John Bull replies : "Very nice napple, indeed ! but my pokes are all full of pippins from off t'other tree " (the British Constitution); "and besides, I hates medlars, they're so domn'd rotten, that I'se afraid they'll gee me the guts-ach for all their vine looks ! " "De Quoi Vous Plaignez-vous ?" (a/?t'/- 7^(7^d/) 173S " L'ennemi menace la France, vous vous elancez, il est foudroye I Les peuples gemissent dans I'esclavage, ils vous tendent les bras et vous les affran- chissez du joug qui les opprime ! ! ! Le drapeau tricolore couvre de ses plis genereux les capitales conquises par vous ! ! ! Et vous vous plaignez ! quand il n'est pas un mortel qui ne vous porte envie ! " An officer is represented encouraging by this address a troop of peasant recruits, wounded, ragged, and shod with bands of straw. The splendid series of Raffet's illustrations of the war, one of which is here reproduced from H. Beraldi's " Raffet," revives the finest traditions of the army of the Re» public and of the whole career of Napoleon. Placard OF Order for Execution OF Louis XVI 1760 This placard, which is here reproduced for the first time, has been photo- graphed from the only one of the original placards which escaped destruction, and is now preserved in the Musee Carnavalet. The proclamation was posted up in the streets of Paris, and set forth the decree issued, 20 January, 1793, by the Executive Council for the carrying out on the following day of the sentence of death passed upon " Louis Capet," with the time appointed and the order to be observed in the proceedings. "Georges Tournant la Meule de Pitt" {print in the Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris) 1 761 A French satire on Pitt and George III. Horatio 'Sii.i.sos {picture by /. //oppner, in St. /ames's Talaee) 1762 An English Sailor i^gj From a print, dated 1779, entitled "A Dance by the Virtue of British Oak." The Englishman is defying a Frenchman and a Spaniard. "Kidnapping, OR A Disgrace TO Old England," 1794 1764 A satirical picture of the horrors of the press-gang. Recrv ITS {satirical s/:etch by W. //. Bunbury, ijSo) 1765 Napoleon Bonaparte {from an engraving- by Ficsin^er of a picture by GuJrin, »799) ' ' 1766 "The Glorious First of June" {fnun an engraving by 7". Mcdland of a picture painted 1 794 l>y R. Clcveley, R.N.) .... ' 1 76S VOL. IV. j8 NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE Nelson at Cape St. Vincknt 1770 In this battle Nelson held the rank of Commodore. His ship, the "Captain," after engaging with six Spanish vessels in succession, ran along- side the Spanish " San Nicolas" and took her by boarding ; Nelson himself boardei! " San from the , . . - , , . her (piarter-deck the surrender of the Admiral and officers. The view of this incident here reproduced was "painted under the direction of Lord Nelson and the officers of II. .M.S. 'Captain,'" by D. Orme, "historical engraver to the King and the Prince of Wales," and published by him in 1800. he Spanish "San Nicolas and took ncr hy hoarding ; i\eison niinseii ed through tlie cabin window.s. Beyond the "San Nicolas" lay the losef," which carried the Spanish Rear-.\dmiral. Nelson led his men the one ship to the other, captured the " San Josef," and received on Flag OF THE "Niger," 1797 (t^w/Av/'.S'6';-w of the staff. A small number of these were captured at various places — Salamanca, Viloria, Waterloo, Maida, &c. — and some of them are in public institutions in London. Spanish Royalist Cockavk {C/nited Service Museum) 1809 Inscribed in Spanish, " Long live Ferdinand and George III." Major-General Wellesley {engraved l>y O. Lacour from a picture by Robert Home, 1806; 1810 Silver Pen.ny of Washington, ijgz {Snowdeu, '' Medals of Wash inoton") . 1813 The mint of the United States was founded in 1792, and issued its first coins in 1793. As early as 1 791, however, some experimental dies were pre- Ijared, bearing on the obverse a head of Washington, and on the reverse the design shown here. Washington himself objected to the placing of his like- ness on the coinage, and in the Bill for establishing the mint it was accordingly ordained that "an impression emblematic of Liberty" should be substituted for the portrait of the President. Liverpool Halfpenny, l^9■i {from a cast in the British Museum) 1813 An early .\mcrican coin, or token, used in trade with England ; on the edge is inscribed, " Payable in Anglesey, London, or Liverpool," The other side bears a head of \Vashington. V.>^v.\Am '^MX.oK, i^T {.It/dnson, '' Costumes of Great Britain") . . 1814 .Midshipman, i 799 («//,?/- 7". IK A'owlandson) 1814 Procession and Cuairini; of Sir Francis Burdkiion his election for Wkstminsiek, 1807 {contemporary print) 1816 Medal Commemokai ing Wellington's Eniry into .Madrid (South A'en- sington Mmcum) 1X19 NOTES ON rill': IM-LSTRAIIONS PAGE Mkuai. c;ivkn to Amk.kican Indian Cuikks {'/'ainra/, '• /yciord of Aft-dals^') 1822 During the American War of Independence the Knglisli Government caused medals to he struck as rewards for the Indian chiefs who adhered to the luiglish side. This practice was renewed in the later wars with America. These medals all bore on their obverse a bust of the King ; the reverse of the one here figured is interesting for its design, an Indian and an Englishman smoking the pipe of peace together — "Happy while united." The loop for suspension is formed by an eagle's wing and a calumet, or i)ipe of peace, placed crosswise. lIoUGOMONT (after J. M. IT. Titnicr) 1825 Till'; " Bki.lkrophon '■ [after J. M. \V. Turner) 1827 The shij) which carried Napoleon to St. Helena. CiiKi.SKA Pen.sioM':rs KiiADiNG Tiir. GAZETTE OF WATERLOO [picture by Sir David Wilkie, 1822) 1828 The Hat-Finishers in CoMinNAiioN, 1820 [Place MSS., vol. i., MS. Add. 27799, British Museum) 1S29 A print at the head of a written paper of " Resolutions agreed to at a meeting of finishers held at the 'Prince and Princess,' Gravel Lane, on Thursday, the 25th of May, 1820." The assembled finishers fix the i)rice for hats [\is. ])er dozen, or I2.f. per dozen, according to "inches yeoman"), and for the finishing work ; tliey resolve that all workmen in shops where the prices thus fixecl are not agreed to, shall "solicit their employers " and bring their answer to another meeting, to be held a week later ; that each shop shall send to the next and every succeeding meeting representatives in the proportion of one for every five men ; and " that Thos. Meyers be Fined \s. \od. for the first, and 55. yl, for the second offence of being disorderly at this meeting." The Bombardment of Algiers by Viscount Exmouth, 1816 (picture by George Cliambers, at the Koyal Naval College, Greemuich) 1830 Daniel O'Connei.l {miniature by B. Mulreniii, 1836, in the National I'ortrait Gallery) 1833 Repeal Bvtto'ss [" Illustrated London Nezus," 184.;^) 1833 Town Hall, Birmingham (built 1834) 1834 A Manchester Operative (" Illustrated London A^ezus," 1842) 1836 Staffordshire Colliers ("■ J^enny Magazine," \8t,6) ■ 1836 The "Rocket" 1837 Built by George Stephenson to ccniipete in a trial of locomotive engines for the Liverpool and Manchester Railway at Rainhill, in Octobei-, 1829, where it gained the prize of ;^500 offered by the directors to the makers of the l)est locomotive comi)lying with certain stated conditions. The greatest s]ieed it attained in the trial was 29 miles an hour ; some years later it ran 4 miles in 41 minutes (=53 miles an hour). It was used on the Liverpool and Man- chester line till 1837, thence removed to the ISIidgeholme Railway, near Carlisle, ceased working in 1844, and was placed in the South Kensington Museum in 1862. It has been much altered at different times ; the view here given is from a photograph of a model at Crew e, made from drawings in the possession of the London and North Western Railway Company, showing the engine as it was originally built. Diameter of driving wheels, 4 ft. 8iin. ; diameter of cylinders, 8 in., with stroke of l6iin. ; weight of engine when empty, 3 tons 5 cw^t. ; in working order, 4 tons 5 cwt. Total working weight of engine and the four-wheeled truck which formed the tender, 7*45 tons. 'Greater Britain" 1837 London and North Western compound express passenger engine, designed by IMr. F. W. Webb, and built at the Company's works, Crewe, 1893. Diameter of driving wheels, 7 feet; diameter and stroke of cylinders, low, 30 X 24, high, 15 X 24. Total weight of engine, 52 tons 2 cwt.; total weight w ith lender, 77 tons 2 cwt. ; length of engine and tender over buffers, 54 ft. oA in.; heating .surface, 1,505 sq. ft. 7 sq. in. The leading wheels are fitted with a patent radial ,ixle-box to allow the engine to travel over curves w ith safety. NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS cv PAGE INlEDAL Commemorating the Bombardment of Acre 1S3S Given by the Sultan to the officei-s and crews of the English ships which took part in this exploit. The design represents a fortress on which flies the Turkish ling; above are six stars, below is a Turkish inscription with date. The other side has the Sultan's cypher surrounded by a wreath of laurel. Chinese Sketch of an English Sailor {'■'■ Illustrated London N'cws" 1857) 1S38 Issued during the war between China and England in 1839. The cloud issuing from the mouth of the figure is doubtless meant for tobacco-smoke. The original has at the side an inscription in Chinese which runs thus : "This creature appears in the Tsing-teen-heen district of Choo-chow-foo, of the capital of Che-keang. Several troops of men surrounding it, it then changed into blood and water. Soldiers should shoot it with fire-arms, for bows and arrows are unable to injure it. When it appears, the people and troops should be informed that whoever is able to destroy or ward it off will be most amply rewarded. If the monster find itself surrounded by soldiers, it turns and falls into the water. ^Yhen it meets any one it forthwith eats him. It is truly a wonderful monster." Viscount Melbourne (//t/«;-atron saint, while the colours were almost certainly adojited in the fourter-nth or early fifteenth century from Erance, at that time Scotland's close ally. In Ajjril 1606 James I. ordered that "henceforth all our .subjects of this isle and kingdom of Great Britain and the members thereof shall bear VOL. IV. 40 cvi NOTES ON Till': ILLUSTRATIONS in their maintop the red cross commonly called S. George's cross, and the white cross conmionly called S. Andrew's cross, joined together according to a form made by our heralds and sent by us to our Admiral, to be published to our said subjects." Thus was formed the first union flag (3). After the union of Ireland with Great Britain, there was added a red saltire on a white ground (4), commonly called " S. Patrick's cross." A cross, however, is not the proper emblem of S. Patrick ; the device in this case is really the letter X, part of the sacred monogram of the Labarum, and while its form may thus have been handed down from the earliest days of Irish Christianity, its colours are those of England, introduced by the Anglo-Norman settlers of the Pale. At the beginning of the eigliteenth century, however, this so-called "cross of S. Patrick" was recognised as the Irish ilag, and as such it was, in 1801, in- corporated in the flag of Great Britain and Ireland (5), now known as "the "Union Jack." The word "Jack," used in this sense, is sometimes said to be derived from " Jacolius," the Latin form of James, and supposed to allude to the union of England and Scotland under James I. It seems, however, to have had another and a far earlier origin. In 1386 Richard II., when about to invade Scotland, ordered that " everi man of what estate, condicion or nacion thei be of, so that he be one of oure partie, here a signe of the amies of S. George, large, both before and behynde, upon parell that yff he be slayne or wounded to deth, he that hath so doon to hym shall not be ])utte to deth for defaulte of the crosse he lacketh " : — i.e., the soldiers of England were to make themselves known, like their forefathers in Holy Land, by the cross of S. Gccrge on their tunics or surcoats — an order which was renewed under Henry VI. ; and as early as 1375 these wadded, quilted, or leathern tunics worn by the common soldiers were known Ti^ Jacks. In the sixteenth century the word had another application. In 1575 there is an account " for making 1,500 Jackes, plated before, for furniture of the Queene's ma'''=^ shippes." The details of the account show that these were shield-like defences, made of leather stretched over frames, stuffed inside, and strengthened externally (as the men's jacks also were sometimes) with iron plates. A whole row of them, looking like shields, and all marked with the cross of S. George, is shown on each quarterdeck along the sides of the king's ship in the picture at Windsor representing Henry \TII.'s embarkation for France in 1520, and also in Anthony's picture of the Harry-Grace-a-Dieu, 1512, reproduced in p. 612 above. The two kinds of "jacks " — those of the ships and those of the men — are in fact illustrated side by side in pp. 612 and 613. It is easy to see how the name would get transferred from soldier's tunic and ship's furniture to the cross of S. George, which was the distinguishing badge of both, and thence to the flag on which that cross was emblazoned more conspicuously still. Map of London (Z^/zV, '■^ History of Londoii") Frontispiece to Vol. IV. CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS VOL. I P. i, note on S. Matthew, from the Book of Kells, p. i, the sentence beginning " Usher's library" should read : " Usher's library, bought by the English army and the State in 1656 for a proposed new college at Dublin, wa» given by Charles II. to Trinity College, where," . 1130 — 1174 170 Weaving, A.T). 1130— 1174 171 From MS. Trinity College. Cambridge," &c. For sentence beginning " The small drawings " read : " It is. like MS. Had. 603 (see above, p. ix), a copy of the Utrecht Psalter, but more freely treated. The milking and churn seem to be original, and therefore English. In the weaving new details are added in Eadwine's copy." P. xi, notes on Building and Group round a table, p. 173, should read : — "liuildrng I f^MS. Harl. (iO\, after Utrecht rsaltcr) 173 Group round a table J * J' v ' 'J The fortification is after the Roman manner, as in the Utrecht M.S. The table is Roman ; the figures have been added and are English." P. xi, note on Men in Prison and in Slocks, p. 178, add: " luiglish ; not in Utrecht Psalter." CORRECTIONS AM) ADDll'IOXS P. xi, note on (hj^aii, p. 1S2, aiKl : "Copied from the Utrcchl I's.ilter." P. xi, note on The Exchequer, jx 184, first two lines should read : " Better drawn than the original in the I'Uvcht Psalter; the headgear of the jiresiding officer is altered from the crown with halls on it given in the Utrecht MS. The picture illustrates the weighing of the money received at the Exchequer, which was customary under Ilenry I. and Bisho]) Roger." P. xii, note on Frithstool, p. 203, last sentence should read : " The llcxham frithstool dales from the twelfth centur)-. Only one other now remains in England, at Beverley Minster." P. xiii, note on Seal of Les Andelys, p. 215, should read : " This seal, in the collection of the late Rev. S. S. Lewis, dates from the English re-conquest of Normandy in the fifteenth century. The castle figured on it is probably meant for a con- ventional representation of Chateau-Gaillard, the head of the lordship of Les Andelys ; the armorial bearings are those adopted by the English kings as claimants of the Crown of France." P. xiv, note on Hedgehogs and Mushroom, ]i. 226, for " Mushroom " read "Trees." P. xiv, note on the Great Charter, p. 241, should read : " Four contemporary copies of the charter remain ; one at Lincoln, one at Salisl)ury, two in the British Museum. The facsimile, reduced to rather more than a third of the original size, is from one of these last ; the other, which alone of the four has ' the royal seal still hanging ' from it (see p. 240), is so 'injured by age and fire' as to be illegible." P. xviii, note on Facsimile from Red Book of llergest, p. 307, for "now in Jesus College" read "now in the Bodleian library, but belonging to Jesus College." P. xix, note on Brass in Gorleslon Church, p. 332, should read : " I'robably one of the Bacon family, c. 1320." P. xxiii, note on Venice, p. 387, should read : — '' Venice {/ro/i/is/>iece fo MS. Bo(//. M/.sr. 264, -p^irt in) 387 The official account in the Bodleian attributes this French History of Marco Polo's travels to an English scribe and a French artist, late in the fourteenth century. According to the high authority of Mr. R. Holmes, Librarian at Windsor Castle, MS. and illuminations are English work of the fifteenth century." P. xxiii, note on Bridge over Esk, p. 388, for "early" read "late." P. xxiii, add at end of note on Musicians and Audience, p. 396 : " The portative was a wind instrument with keyboard and bellows." P. xxiv, line l, for " Violin " read " Viol." P. xxiv, line 3, for " Lute " read " Cittern." P. XXV, note on English soldiers scaling a fortress, p. 442, c/e/e "temp. Edward IH.," and for " early in the fourteenth century" read "in the fifteenth century." P. XXV, note on the House of Lords, p. 445, for " 1274" read " 1277." P. XXV, note on Brass of Sir Robert Attetyc, p. 446, should read : — "Brass in Barsham Church, Suffolk [Siicklini^'; " Hisfpiy of Siiffolk""). 446 Date c. 141 5. Prol)ably Sir John Suckling." P. XXV, last note, for " Brasse " read " Brass." P. xxvi, note on A Pope in Consistory, p. 454, should read : — " Pope and Cardinals {MS. Add. 23923, Brilish Mitseitni) 454 This illumination is of Italian workmanship ; it forms the headpiece to a copy of the Decretals of Jioniface VHL, who died in 1303. The Pope, however, is represented wearing the triple tiara, which was not yet in use in Boniface's time, and the MS. dates from about 1380." Pp. 4, 5, II. 42, 43, titles under cuts, for " Early Civilization of Sweden" read " Civili- zation of Sweden." P. 47, title under cut, for " Penda" read " Peada " 1'. 69, line 7, for " /Elhebald " read " .^Ethelbald." P. 102, title under cut, for "Otto H." read " Otto L" P. 116, ,, ,, " Noak " read " Noah. " P. 215, ,, ,, "Late thirteenth or early fourteenth century" read "Fif- teenth century." P. 226, title under cut, for " Mushroom" read " Trees." P. 252, line I, insert full stoj) after "Osney." P. 307, title under cut, for "now in Jesus College, Oxford," read "now belonging to Jesus College, Oxford ; exhibited in Bodleian Library." P. 332, title under cut, for "end of thirteenth century '" read "early fourteenth century." Title under plate facing p. 387, dele "A.D. 1338." CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS P. 388, title under cut, for " early" read "late." P. 396, ,, ,, ,, "cornet and virginals" read "shawm and portative." V. 396, ,, ,, ,, " Violin" read " Viol." P. 397, ,, ,, ,, " Lute" read " Cittern." P. 442, ,, ,, rf'(?/e " Temp. Edward III.," and for "fourteenth" read "fif- teenth." P. 446, title under cut, dc-/e " of Sir Robert Attetye," and for " c. 1380 " read " c. 1415." P. 454, ,, ,, for "early" read "late." VOL. II P. xxvii, first note should read : — "The Knight of the Wheelbarrow, A.D. 1338-44 (MS. Bodl. Misc. 264) 469 Probably being brought home from the inn." P. xxvii, note in second illustration in p. 481, for " Swan-hopping" read "Shoeing a swan ; a mediaeval jest." P. xxviii, note on David and his choir, p. 503, the sentence beginning "The psaltery" should read : " The psaltery, held on the knees, was now superseding an earlier stringed instrument called the rote (a descendant of the lyre), which is shown in pp. 64 and 72, and which developed later into the Welsh crwth. The harp," &c. P, xxxviii, note on shrine of S. Thomas de Cantelupe, p. 701, should read : " S. Thomas de Cantelupe, Bishop of Hereford, was the last canonized Englishman. His shrine, erected in'1287 — five years after his death, and twenty years before his canonization at Rome — is one of the three," &c. P. xlv, note on Bedstead, page 791, should read: "In South Kensington Museum; formerly at Turton Tower, Lancashire, and said to have been given by a King of France to an Earl of Devon. No coronet however surmounts the Courtenay arms carved on the frieze ; and on the footboard is the date 1593, twenty-seven years after the death of the last Earl of Devon. The bedstead was in all likeli- hood made in England for one of the Courtenay family." P. xlvii, note on The Shepherd's Calendar, pp. 849-854, for " 1597" read "1579" twice. P. liii. line 16, for " 1501 " read " 1581." P. 469, title under cut, for "The Lady of the Manor" read " The Knight of the Wheel- barrow." P. 48 1, title under cut, for "Swan-hopping" read "Shoeing a Swan; a mediceval proverb." P. 495. line 2 from foot, for "very" read " wery." P. 585. line 5, for " logitimated " read " legitimatized." P. 660, title under cut, for " The Dancing Picture" read " Courtiers Dancing," and dele " by Holbein and Janet." P. 745, line 9 from foot, insert comma after " Suffolk." Pp. 849-854, titles under cuts, for " 1597 " read " 1579." VOL. Ill p. Ix, last note, for " History England " read " History of England." P. ixiii, note on Facsimile, p. 1104, for " Solemn League and Covenant " read " Scottish National Covenant." P. Ixvi, lines 3-16 of note on " A Lovely Company," pp. 1162-1166, should read : " This house— now used as a convalescent home in connexion with the Hospital for Sick Children in Great Ormonde Street — once belonged to John Ireton, alderman of London, and brother of Henry Ireton, who was Cromwell's son-in-law. One of the rooms has on its ceiling (partly burnt in 1865, ^'"t restored) a coat-of-arms which seems to be that of the Ireton family. The monogram I. C, on a mantel- piece in another room, and the same initials, with a small O between them, I6S2 The Ex- clusion Bill 5^ ' ^ "" 1 THE LONG GALLERY, HAM HOUSE. The nation was frenzied with suspicion and panic. The elections to the Parliament had taken place amidst a whirl of excitement which left no place for candidates of the Court. The appointment of the new ministry, indeed, was welcomed with a general burst of joy. l^ut the question of the Succession threw all others into the shade. At the bottom of the national panic la\^ the dread of a Catholic King, a dread which the after history of James full}- justified. Shaftesbury was earnest for the exclusion of James, but as yet the majorit)- (jf the Council shrank from the stcj), ami 141 6 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. V supported a plan which Charles brought forward for preserving the Shaftks- rights of the Duke of York while restraining his powers as BURY ° 1679 sovereign. By this project the presentation to Church livings was 16S2 to be taken out of his hands on his accession. The last Parliament The Bill of of the preceding reign was to continue to sit ; and the appointment Sccuntus ^^ ^^jj (^-o^ijicillors, Judges, Lord-Lieutenants, and officers in the fleet, was vested in the two Llouses so long as a Catholic sovereign was on the throne. The extent of these provisions showed the pressure which Charles felt, but Shaftesbury was undoubtedly right in setting the plan aside as at once insufficient and impracti- cable. He continued to advocate the Exclusion in the royal Council ; and a bill for depriving James of his right to the Crown, and for devolving it on the next Protestant in the line of succession, was introduced into the Commons by his adherents, and passed the House by a large majorit}'. It was known that Charles would use his influence with the Peers for its rejection, and the Earl therefore fell back on the tactics of P}'m. A bold Remonstrance was pre- pared in the Commons. The City of London was ready with an address to the two Houses in favour of the bill. All Charles could do was to gain time by the prorogation of the Parliament, and by its dissolution in ]\Iay. Mon- But delay would have been useless had the Country party mouth remained at one. The tcmjxjr of the nation and of the House of Commons was so hotly pronounced in favour of the exclusion of the Duke, that union among the ministers must in the end have secured it and spared England the necessity for the Revolution of 1688. The wiser leaders of the Country party, indeed, were already leaning to the very change which that Revolution brought about. If James were passed over, his daughter Mary, the wife of the Prince of Orange, stood next in the order of succession : and the plan of Temple, Essex, and Halifax after the failure of their bill of Securities, was to bring the Prince over to England during the pro- rogation, to introduce him into the Council, and to pave his way to the throne. Cnhappih' Shaftesbury was contemplating a very different course. He distrusted the Prince of Orange as a mere adherent of the royal house, and as opposed to any weakening of the royal power or invasion of the royal prerogative. His motive for setting aside William's claims is probably to be found in the THE REVOLUTION 1417 maxim ascribed to him, that " a bad title makes a good king." sec. v Whatever were his motives, howev^cr, he had resolved to set aside Shaftes- bury the claims of James and his children, as well as William's own 1679 TO 1682 JAMKS, DUKK OF MONMOU'I II. Picture by Sir Peter Lcly at Dalkeith Palac claim, and to place the Duke of Monmouth on the throne. Monmouth was reputed to be the eldest of the King's bastards, a weak and worthless [jrofiigate in temper, but jxipular through his I4i8 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAr. Sec. V personal beauty and his reputation for bravery. The tale was set about of a secret marriage between the King and his mother ; Shaftesbur\- inthiccd Charles to put the Duke at the head of the troops sent to repress a rising of the Covenanters in the west of Scotland, and on his return pressed the King to give him the com- Shaftes- BL'RV 1679 TO 1682 lo^casr^BB^ifiatis^ ^ (0 fe5F0iM£t!W,E™iisw'¥!Cfyij BANNER USED BY TIIK COVENANTERS AT DRUMCLOfi AND liOTIIWELI, BRIG, 1679. Napier, ^' Jilcntoirs of Dundee." Shaftes- bury's Second Dismissal mand of the Guards, which would have put the only militar}- force possessed b)- the Crown in Monmouth's hands. Sunderland, Halifax, and Essex, however, were not only steadily opposed to Shaftesbury's project, but saw themselves marked out for ruin in the event of Shaftesbury's success. They had advised the dissolution of the last Parliament ; and the Earl's anger had vented itself in threats that the advisers of the dissolution should pay for it with their heads. The danger came home to them when a sudden illness of the King and the absence of James made Monmouth's accession a possible contingency. The three ministers at once induced Charles to recall the Duke of York ; and though he withdrew to Scotland on the King's recover}-, Charles deprived IX THE REVOLUTION 141 9 Monmouth of his charge as Captain-General of the Forces and SEa_v ordered him Hke James to leave the realm. Left alone in his cause shaftes- 1679 TO 1682 SAMITF.I, PEPYS. Imprisoned in the Tower, 1679, during the panic of the Popish Picture by John Hayls, in the National Portrait Gallery. by the opposition of his colleagues, Shaftesbur>- threw himself more and more on the support of the Plot. The prosecution ol its '. L^^atif ad iffi/tcnt^ cCe^V' 6r T'irtue tScu^. FRANCIS NORTH, LORD GUILFORD, KEEPER OF THE GREAT SEAL, 1680. Fj-otn an engraving by C. Vertue after David Loggan. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 142 1 victims was pushed recklessly on. Three Catholics were hanged sec. v in London. Eight priests were put to death in the country. Pur- ^"^y^^^" sui\ants and informers spread terror through every Catholic 1679 TO household. He counted on the reassembling of the Parliament to 1682 bring all this terror to bear upon the King. But Charles had already marked the breach which the Earl's policy had made in the ranks of the Country party. He saw that Shaftesbur}- was unsupported by any of his colleagues save Russell. To Temple, Essex, or Halifax it seemed possible to bring about the succession of IMary without any violent revolution ; but to set aside not only the right of James but the right of his Protestant children, and even of the Prince of Orange, was to ensure a civil war. It was with their full support therefore that Charles deprived Shaftesbury of his post of Lord President of the Council. The dismissal was the Oct. 1679 signal for a struggle to whose danger Charles was far from blinding himself. What had saved him till now was his cynical courage. In the midst of the terror and panic of the Plot men " wondered to Shaftes- billy's see him quite cheerful amidst such an intricacy of troubles," says struggle the courtly Rercsb}-, " but it was not in his nature to think or perplex himself much about anything." Even in the heat of the tumult which followed on Shaftesbury's dismissal, Charles was seen fishing and sauntering as usual in Windsor Park. But closer observers than Rcrcsby saw beneath this veil of indolent unconcern a consciousness of new danger. " From this time," says Burnet, " his temper was observed to change very visibly." He became in fact " sullen and thoughtful ; he saw that he had to do with a strange sort of people, that could neither be managed nor fright- ened." But he faced the danger with his old unscrupulous cool- ness. He reopened secret negotiations with France. Lewis was as alarmed as Charles himself at the warlike temper of the nation, and as anxious to prevent the assembly of a Parliament ; but the terms on which he offered a subsidy were too humiliating even for the King's acceptance. The failure forced him to summon a new l*arliament ; and the panic, which Shaftcsbiny was busil)' feeding with new tales of massacre and invasion, returned members even more violent than the members of the House he had just dismissed. A host of petitions called on the King to suffer Parliament to meet at the opening of 1680. ]*l\en the Council shrank from the King'.s ^42 2 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. V proposal to prorog^uc its assembly to November, 1680, but Charles Sh^es- persisted. Alone as he stood, he was firm in his resolve to gain 1679 time, for time, as he saw, was workiiiL;- in his favour. The tide of 1682 public s)-mpathy was beginning to turn. The perjury of Gates proved too much at last for the credulity of juries ; and the acquit- tal of four of his victims was a sign that the panic was beginning to ebb. A far stronger proof of this was seen in the immense efforts which Shaftesbury made to maintain it. Fresh informers were brought forward to swear to a plot for the assassination of the Earl himself, and to the share of the Duke of York in the con- spiracies of his fellow-religionists. A paper found in a meal-tub was produced as evidence of the new danger. Gigantic torch-light processions paraded the streets of London, and the effigy of the Pope was burnt amidst the wild outcry of a vast multitude. Peti- Acts of yet greater daring showed the lengths to which and"Ab- Shaftesbury was ready to go. He had grown up amidst the horrers tumults of civil war, and, greyheaded as he was, the fire and vehemence of his early days seemed to wake again in the singular recklessness with which he drove on the nation to a struggle in arms. Early in 1680 he formed a committee for promoting agitation throughout the country ; and the petitions which it drew up for the assembly of the Parliament were sent to every town and grand jury, and sent back again with thousands of signatures. INIonmouth, in spite of the King's orders, returned at Shaftesbury's call to London ; and a daring pamphlet pointed him out as the nation's leader in the coming struggle " against Popery and tyranny." So great was the alarm of the Council that the garrison in every fortress was held in readiness for instant war. But the danger was really less than it seemed. The tide of opinion had fairh' turned. Acquittal followed acquittal. A The reaction of horror and remorse at the cruelty which had hurried victim after victim to the gallows succeeded to the pitiless frenzy which Shaftesbury had fanned into a flame. Anxious as the nation was for a Protestant sovereign, its sense of justice revolted against the wrong threatened to James's Protestant children ; and every gentleman in the realm felt insulted at the project of setting Mary aside to put the crown of England on the head of a bastard. The memory too of the Civil War re-action IX THE REVOLUTION 1423 was still fresh and keen, and the rumour of an outbreak of revolt rallied men more and more round the King. The host of petitions which Shaftesbury procured from the counties was answered by a counter host of addresses from thousands who declared their "abhorrence " of the plans against the Crown. The country was divided into two great factions of " petitioners " and " abhorrers," the germs of the two great parties of " Whigs" and "Tories" which have pla}-ed so prominent a part in our political history from the time of the Exclusion Bill. Charles at once took advantage of this turn of affairs. He recalled the Duke of York to the Court. He received the resignations of Russell Sec. V Shaftes- bury X679 10 1682 MEDAL OF THE DUCHESS OF PORTSMOUTH, 1673. and Cavendish, as well as of the Earl of Essex, who had at last gone over to Shaftesbury's projects "with all his heart." Shaftesbury met defiance with defiance. Followed by a crowd of his adherents he attended before the Grand Jury of Middlesex, to indict the Duke of York as a Catholic recusant, and the King's mistress, the Duchess of Portsmouth, as a national nuisance, while Monmouth made a progress through the country, and gained favour everywhere by his winning demeanour. Above all, Shaftesbury relied on the temper of the Commons, elected as they had been in the very heat of the panic and irritatctl by the long delay in calling them together. The first act of tlic I louse on meeting in 1424 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. V October was to vote that their care should be " to suppress Popery Shaftes- and prevent a Popish successor." Rumours of a Catholic plot 1679 in Ireland were hardly needed to push the Exclusion l^ill ihrouCTh TO , '^ 1682 the ( onimons without a division. So resolute was the temper of GEORGE S.WIll . ■.{^•'.''i NT II.ALIFAX. From an cngyaving hy Houbrakcn 0/ a pUtiirc in the possession of Sir George Savile. the Lower House that even Temple and Essex now gave their adhesion to it as a necessity, and Sunderland himself wavered towards accepting it. Halifax, whose abilit}' and eloquence had now brought him fairly to the front, opposed it resolutely IX THE REVOLUTION 14^5 and successfully in the Lords ; but Halifax was only the mouthpiece of William. " My Lord Halifax is entirely in the interest of the Prince of Orange," the French ambassador, Barillon, wrote to his master, " and what he seems to be doing for the Duke of York is really in order to make an opening for a compromise by which the Prince of Orange may benefit." The Exclusion Bill once rejected, Halifax followed up the blow by bringing forward a plan of Protestant securities, which would have taken from James on his accession the right of veto on any bill passed by the two Houses, the right of negotiating with foreign states, or of appoint- ing either civil or military officers save with the consent of Parliament. This plan also was no doubt prompted by the Prince of Orange ; and the States of Holland supported it by pressing Charles to come to an accommodation with his subjects which would enable them to check the perpetual aggressions which France was making on her neighbours But if the Lords would have no Exclusion Bill the Commons with as good reason would have no Securities Bill. They felt — as one of the members for London fairly put it — that such securities would break down at the very moment they were needed. A Catholic king, should he ever come to the throne, would have other forces besides those in England to back. him. " The Duke rules over Scotland; the Irish and the English Papists will follow him ; he will be obeyed by the officials of high and low rank whom the King has appointed ; he will be just such a king as he thinks good." Shaftesbury however was far from resting in a merel}- negative position. He made a despairing effort to do the work of exclusion by a Bill of Divorce, which would have enabled Charles to put away his Queen on the ground of barrenness, and by a fresh marriage to give a Protestant heir to the throne. The Earl was perhaps already sensible of a change in public feeling, and this he resolved to check and turn by a great public impeachment which would revive and establish the general belief in the Plot. Lord Stafford, who from his age and rank was looked on as the leader of the Catholic party, had lain a prisoner in the Tower since the first outburst of popular frenzy. He was now solemn!)- impeached; and his trial in December 1680 mustered the whole force of informers to prove the truth of a Catholic conspirac)- Sec. V Shaftes- BLRY 1679 I6S2 William and the Exclusion 1680 The Oxford Parlia- ment Trial of Lord Stafford i4-f> HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. V Shaftes- bury 1679 TO 1682 against the King and the realm. The evidence was worthless ; but the trial revived, as Shaftesbury had hoped, much of the old panic, and tiic condemnation of the prisoner by a majority of his peers was followed by his death on the scaffold. The blow produced its effect on all but Charles. Sunderland again pressed the King to give wa\-. l^ut deserted as he was b)- his ministers, and e\cn b\' his mistress, for the Duchess of Portsmouth had been cowed into supporting the exclusion b}- the threats of Shaftesbury, Charles was determined to resist. On the coupling of a grant PARADE OF MILITIA AT ABERGWILI. T. Dineley. '^Progress of the Duke of Beaufort through Wales" 1684. of supplies with demands for a voice in the appointment of officers of the royal garrisons he prorogued the Parliament. The truth was that he was again planning an alliance with France. With characteristic subtlety, however, he dissolved the existing 16S1 Parliament, and called a new one to meet in March. The act was a mere blind. The King's aim was to frighten the country into reaction b}' the dread of civil strife ; and his summons of the Parliament to O.xford was an appeal to the country against the disloyalty of the capital, and an adroit means of reviving the IX THE REVOLUTION 1427 memories of the Civil War. With the same end he ordered his Sec. v guards to accompany him, on the pretext of anticipated disorder ; ^"^J^y"" and Shaftesbury, himself terrified at the projects of the Court, 1679 aided the King's designs by appearing with his followers in arms 1682 on the plea of self-protection. Monmouth renewed his progresses through the country. Riots broke out in London. Revolt seemed at hand, and Charles hastened to conclude his secret negotiations Charles turns to with France. He verbally pledged himself to a policy of peace, in France other words to withdrawal from any share in the Grand Alliance which William was building up, while Lewis promised a small subsidy which with the natural growth of the royal revenue sufficed to render Charles, if he remained at peace, independent of Parliamentary aids. The violence of the new Parliament played yet more effectuall}- into the King's hands. The members of the ■ House of Commons were the same as those who had been returned to the Parliaments he had just dissolved, and their temper was naturally embittered by the two dissolutions. Their rejection of a new Limitation Bill brought forward by Halifax, which while granting James the title of King would have vested the actual functions of government in the Prince and Princess of Orange, alienated the more moderate and sensible of the Country party. The attempt of the Lower House to revive the panic by im- peaching an informer named Fitzharris before the House of Lords, in defiance of the constitutional rule which entitled him as a commoner to a trial by his peers in the course of common law, did still more to throw public opinion on the side of the Crown. Shaftesbury's course, in fact, went wholly on a belief that the penury of the Treasury left Charles at his mercy, and that a refusal of supplies must wring from the King his assent to the Exclusion. But the gold of France had freed the King from his thraldom. He had used the Parliament simply to exhibit himself as a sovereign whose patience and conciliatory temper was rewarded with insult and violence; and now that his end was accomplished, he no sooner saw the F.Yclusion Bill rc-introduccd, than he sudclcnl)' dissolved the Hou.ses after a month's sitting, and appealed in a ro}-al declara- tion to the justice of the nation at large. The appeal was met b)' an almost universal burst oflo)'alty. Shaftes- The Church rallied to the King ; his declaration was read from Death Vol. IV— I'AkT 31 4 Z 1428 HISTORY OF rill'. ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. V Shaftes- nURY 1679 TO 1682 every [)uli)il ; aiul the Universities solemnly decided that " no religion, no law, no fault, no forfeiture," could avail to bar the sacred right of hcrcilitar\' succcs.sion. The arrest of Shaftesbury on a charge of suborning false witnesses to the Plot marked the new strength of the Crown. London indeed was still true to him ; the Middlesex (irand Jur\' ignored the bill of his indictment ; and his discharge from the Tower was welcomed in every street with bonfires and ringing of bells. But a fresh impulse was given to the loN'al enthusiasm of the countrj- at large by the publication of a plan said to ha\e been found among his papers, the plan of a secret association for the furtherance of the Exclusion, whose members bound themselves to obey the orders of Parliament even after its MnD.A.L STRUCK TO COMME.MORATE SHAFTESBURY'S ACQUITTAL, 1681. prorogation or dissolution by the Crown. So general was the reaction that Halifax advised the calling of a new Parliament in the belief that it would be a lo}-al one. William of Orange too visited England to take advantage of the turn of affairs to pin Charles to the policy of the Alliance ; but the King met both counsels with evasion. He pushed boldly on in his new course. He confirmed the loyalt}' of the Church by a renewed persecution of the Nonconformists, which drove Penn from England and thus brought about the settlement of Pennsylvania as a refuge for his fellow Quakers. He was soon strong enough to call back James to Court. IMonmouth, who had resumed his progresses through the country as a means of checking the tide of reaction, was arrested, IX THE REVOLUTION 1429 The friendship of a Tory mayor secured the nomination of Tory sec. v sheriffs in London, and the juries they packed left the Hfc of every shaftes 1679 TO 1682 The JLorcL Mayor sc Cornet Of Aide^'merv I'rontiipiece to De Laiinc, "Present State 0/ London," 16S1. I''\-clusionist at the mcrc)- of the Crown. Shaflcsbur}-, ali\-c to the new clanger, pluny,ed niadl)- into consi)iracie.s w ilh a handful of 4 /' - 143° HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. V adv^enturcrs as desperate as himself, hid himself in the City, where Shaftes- he boasted that ten thousand " brisk bovs " were ready to appear at BURY ■' 1679 his call, and urycd his friends to rise in arms. Hut their delays 1682 drove him to flight; and two months after his arrival in Holland, Jan. 16S;, the soul of the great leader, great from his immense energy and the wonderful versatility of his genius, but whose genius and energy had endetl in wrecking for the time the fortunes of English freedom, and in associating the noblest of cau.ses with the vilest of crimes, found its first quiet in death. FROST FAIR 0.\ THAMES, 1683. Broadside in British Museum. IX THE REVOLUTION 1431 LEAD AND COAL MINES AT MOSTYN, It T. DineUy. "Progress of the Duke of Beaufort through Wales," \i Sec. VI The Second Stuart Tyranny 1682 TO 1688 Section VI.— The Second Stuart Tyranny, 1682— 1688 ^Authorities. — To those given before we may add Wehvood's " Memoirs," Luttrell's " Diary," and above all Lord Macaulay's " History of England."] The flight of Shaftesbury proclaimed the triumph of the King. Mis marvellous sagacity had told him when the struggle was over and further resistance useless. But the country leaders, who had delayed to answer the Karl's call, still believed opposition possible ; and Monmouth, with Lord Essex, Lord Howard of Ettrick, Lord Russell, Hampden, and Algernon Sidney held meetings with the view of founding an association whose agitation should force on the King the a.s.sembly of a Parliament. The more desperate spirits who had clustered round him as he la)- hidden in the City took refuge in plots of assassination, and in a plan for murdering Charles The Royal Triumph 143^ Sec. V 1 The Seconu Stuart Tyranny 1682 TO 1688 K yc-housc ' Plot HISTORY OF THK ENGLISH rp:OPLE CHAP. anil his brother as thc\' passed the Rye-house on their road from London to Newmarket, l^oth projects were betrayed, and though they were wholl}- distinct from one another the cruel ingenuity of WILLIAM, LURI) KUSSKI.L. From an engraving by Pieter van der Danck, after Sir Godfrey Knellcr the Crown lawyers blended them into one. Lord Es.sex saved himself from a traitor's death by suicide in the Tower. Lord Russell, convicted on a charge of sharing in the Rye-house plot, was beheaded in Lincoln's Lin Fields. The same fate awaited IX THE REVOLUTION 1433 Algernon Sidney. Monmouth fled in terror over sea, and his sec. vi flight was followed by a series of prosecutions for sedition directed §£ "nd against his followers. In 1683 the Constitutional opposition which ly^^^^ffy had held Charles so long; in check lay crushed at his feet. A 1682 weaker man might easily have been led into a wild tyranny by the 1688 mad outburst of loyalty which greeted his triumph. On the very day when the crowd around Russell's scaffold were dipping their handkerchiefs in his blood, as in the blood of a martyr, the Univer- sity of Oxford solemnly declared that the doctrine of passive obedience, even to the worst of rulers, was a part of religion. But Charles saw that immense obstacles still lay in the road of a mere tyranny. The great Tory party which had rallied to his succour against the Exclusionists were still steady for parliamentary and legal government. The Church was as powerful as ever, and the mention of a renewal of the Indulgence to Nonconformists had to be withdrawn before the opposition of the bishops. He was careful therefore during the few years which remained to him to avoid the appearance of any open violation of public law. He suspended no statute. He imposed no tax by royal authority. Nothing indeed shows more completely how great a work the Long Parliament had done than a survey of the reign of Charles the Second. " The King," Hallam says very truly, " was restored to nothing but what the law had preserved to him." No attempt was made to restore the abuses which the patriots of 1641 had swept away. Parliament was continually summoned. In spite of its frequent refusal of supplies, no attempt was ever made to raise money by unconstitu- tional means. The few illegal proclamations issued under Clarendon ceased with his fall. No effort was made to revive the Star Chamber and the Court of High Commission; and if judges were servile and juries sometimes packed, there was no open interfer- ence with the course of justice. In two remarkable points freedom had made an advance even on 1641. P>om the moment when Freedom printing began to tell on public opinion, it had been gagged by a PrJss .system of licences. The regulations framed under Henry the Eighth subjected the press to the control of the Star Chamber, and the Martin Marprclatc libels brought about a yet more stringent control under I'Ji/.abeth. Iwen the Long Parliament laid a heavy liand on the press, and the great renujnstrance of 1434 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VI Milton ill his " Arcopagitica" fell dead on the ears of his Puritan .T^ associates But the statute for the regulation of printing which Second =1 Stl'akt TVRANNV 1682 TO 1688 1' - '?, 111 ^^' -^'■^V^-^'* J^^- // i ^ ■'•ill MONUMENT OF JOHN MARTIN, PRINTER, 1680. /« Crypt of S. Paul's Cathedral. was passed immediately after the Restoration expired finally in 1679, and the temper of the Parliament at once put an end to any attempt at re-establishing the censorship. To the new freedom of IX THE REVOLUTION 1435 the press the Habeas Corpus Act added a new security for the personal freedom of every EngHshman. Against arbitrary im- prisonment provision had been made in the earliest ages by a famous clause in the Great Charter. No free man could be held in prison save on charge or conviction of crime or for debt, and every prisoner on a criminal charge could demand as a right from the Court of King's Bench the issue of a writ of " habeas corpus," which bound his gaoler to produce both the prisoner and the warrant on which he was imprisoned, that the court might judge whether he was imprisoned according to law. In cases however of im- prisonment on a warrant of the ro)'al Council it had been sometimes held b)- judges that the writ could not be issued, and under Clarendon's administration instances had in this way occurred of imprisonment without legal remedy. But his fall was quickly followed by the introduction of a bill to secure this right of the subject, and after a long struggle the Act which is known as the Habeas Corpus Act passed finally in 1679. By this great statute the old practice of the law was freed from all difficulties and exceptions. Every prisoner committed for any crime save treason or felony was declared entitled to his writ even in the vacations of the courts, and heavy penalties were enforced on judges or gaolers who refused him this right. Every person committed for felon\- or treason was entitled to be released on bail, unless indicted at the next session of gaol delivery after his commitment, and to be discharged if not indicted at the sessions which followed. It was forbidden under the heaviest penalties to send a prisoner into any places or fortresses beyond the seas. Galling to the Crown as the freedom of the press and the Habeas Corpus Act were soon found to be, Charles made no attempt to curtail the one or to infringe the other. But while cautious to avoid rousing popular resistance, he moved cooll}- and resolutely forwartl on the path of despotism. It was in vain that Halifax pressed for energetic resistance to the aggressions of rVance, fr^r the recall of Monmouth, or for the calling of a fresh I'arliamcnt. Like ever}' other luiglish statesman he found he liad been duped, and that now his work was done he was suffered to remain in office but left without any influence in the go\-crnmcnt. Ih'de, who was created ICarl of Rocliestcr, still rtinainctl at tlu: head Sec. Vi The Second Stuart Tyranny 1682 1688 Habeas Corpus Act Death of Charles "the abolition of monarchy." Nalson, ''Collection of Affairs of State," 16S3. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1437 of the Treasur}' ; but Charles soon gave more of his confidence to the supple and acute Sunderland. Parliament, in defiance of the Triennial Act, which after having been repealed had been re-enacted but without the safeguards of the original act, remained unassembled during the remainder of the King's reign. His secret alliance with France furnished Charles with the funds he immediate- ly required, and the rapid growth of the customs through the increase of English commerce promised to give him a revenue which, if peace were preserved, would save him from the need of a fresh appeal to the Commons. All opposition was at an end. The strength of the Country party had been broken by its own dissensions over the Exclusion Bill, and by the flight or death of its more prominent leaders. Whatever strength it retained lay chicfl)' in the towns, and these were now attacked by writs of "quo warranto," which called on them to show cause why their charters should not be declared forfeited on the ground of abuse of their privileges. .V few verdicts on the side of the Crown brought about a general surrender of municipal liberties ; and the grant of fresh charters, in which all but uhra-loyalists were carefully excluded from their corporations, placed the representation (;f the horouglis in the hands INSIGNIA OF THE CORPORATION OF COVKNTRY. Seventeenth Century. Art Journal. Sec. VI The Second Stuart Tyranny 1682 TO 1688 Town Charters 143S HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap, ix Sec. VI of thc Crown. Against active discontent Charles had long been sJcoND quietly providing by thc gradual increase of his Guards. Thc ivra'^nIa- withdrawal of its garrison from Tangier enabled him to raise their force to nine thousand \\cll-c(|uippcd soldiers, and to supplement 1682 TO 1 688 MACE, MACE, NEWTOW.N SOUTHANU'TON. (iSLE OF WIGHT). Temp. Hc-nry VII. Temp. Henry VII. Proceedings of Smlety of Antiquaries. ^i45 MACES, STAMFORD Temp. Charles II. Art Journal. this force, thc nucleus of our present standing army, by a reserve of six regiments, which were maintained till they should be needed at home at the service of the United Provinces. But ereat as the danger reall}' was, it lay not so much in isolated acts of tyranny as in thc character and purpose of Charles himself His death at the KOYAL MANDAIE I O KKASK TIIK NAMF. OF I.OCKF, FROM TIIK STUUIi.NTS OF CHRIST CHURCH, OXFORD, 1684. - ^ CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1441 very moment of his triumph saved EngHsh freedom. He had sec. vi regained his old popularity, and at the news of his sickness crowds g^^^^^ thronged the churches, praying that God would raise him up again tyr^nnv to be a father to his people. But the one anxiety of the King was 1682 to die reconciled to the Catholic Church. His chamber was 1688 cleared and a priest named Huddleston, who had saved his life 1685 after the battle of Worcester, received his confession and adminis- tered the last sacraments. Not a word of this ceremony was whispered when the nobles and bishops were recalled into the royal presence. All the children of his mistresses save Monmouth were gathered round the bed. Charles " blessed all his children one by one, pulling them on to his bed ; and then the bishops moved him, as he was the Lord's anointed and the father of his country, to bless them also and all that were there present, and in them the general body of his subjects. Whereupon, the room being full, all fell down upon their knees, and he raised himself in his bed and very solemnly blessed them all." The strange comedy was at last over. Charles died as he had lived : brave, witty, cynical, even in the presence of death. Tortured as he was with pain, he begged the bystanders to forgive him for being so un- conscionable a time in dying. One mistress, the Duchess of Portsmouth, hung weeping over his bed. His last thought was of another mistress, Nell Gwynn. " Do not," he whispered to his successor ere he sank into a fatal stupor, " do not let poor Nelly starve ! " The first words of James on his accession in February 1685, his James the promise " to preserve the Government both in Church and State as second it is now by law established," were welcomed by the whole country with enthusiasm. All the suspicions of a Catholic sovereign seemed to have disappeared. " Wc have the word of a King ! " ran the general cry, " and of a King who was never worse than his word." The conviction of his brother's faithlessness stood James in good stead. He was looked upon as narrow, impetuous, stubborn, and despotic in heart, but even his enemies did not accuse him of being false. Above all he was believed to be keenly alive to the honour of his countr)', and resolute to free it from foreign dependence. It was necessary to summon a Parliament, for the r()\'al revenue ceased with the death of Charles ; l)ut the CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION M4- elections, swayed at once by the tide of loyalty and by the com- Sec. vi mand of the boroughs which the surrender of their charters had the ° Second Stuart 'I'yrannv 1682 JA.MKS II. Illumination on Patent in Public Record Office. given to the Crown, sent ii]) a House of ("oinmons in wliich James found few memljcrs wIkj were not to his mind. 'Jhc ([ucstion of religious sccurit}' was waived at a hint of the royal displeasiu'c. Vol.. IV— I'Aur 31 5 .\ 1444 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VI The Second Stuart Tyranny 1682 TO 1688 A rgyll's rising Mofi- mouth's rising A revenue of nearly two millions was i^rantcd to the Kini;" for life. All that was wantctl to rou.sc the loyalty of the country into fanati- cism was supplied b)- a rebellion in the North, and by another under Monmouth in the West. The hopes of Scotch freedom had clung ever since the Restoration to the house of Arg)ll. The great Marquis, indeed, had been brought to the block at the King's return. His son, the Earl of Argyll, had been unable to save himself even by a life of singular caution and obedience from the ill-will of the vile politicians who governed Scotland. He was at last convicted of treason in 1682 on grounds at which every English statesman stood aghast. " \Vc should not hang a dog here," Halifax protested, " on the grounds on which my lord Argyll has been sentenced to death." The Earl escaped however to Holland, and lived peacefully there diu'ing the last years of the reign of Charles. Monmouth had found the same refuge at the Hague, where a belief in the King's purpose to recall him secured him a kindly reception from William of Orange. But the accession of James was a death-blow to the hopes of the Duke, while it stirred the fanaticism of Argyll to a resolve of wresting Scotland from the rule of a Catholic king. The two leaders determined to appear in arms in England and the North, and the two expeditions sailed within a few days of each other. Argyll's attempt was soon over. His clan of the Campbells rose on his landing in Cantyre, but the country had been occupied for the King, and quarrels among the exiles who accompanied him robbed his effort of every chance of success. His force scattered without a fight ; and Argyll, arrested in an attempt to escape, was hurried to a traitor's death. Monmouth for a time found brighter fortune. His popularity in the West was great, and though the gentry held aloof when he landed at Lyme, and demanded effective parliamentar\' government and freedom of worship for Protestant Nonconformists, the farmers and traders of Devonshire and Dorset flocked to his standard. The clothier-towns of Somerset were true to the Whig cause, and on the entrance of the Duke into Taunton the popular enthu- siasm showed itself in flowers which wreathed every door, as well as in a train of young girls who presented INIonmouth with a Bible and a flag. His forces now amounted to six thousand men, but whatever chance of success he might have had was lost bv his IX THE REVOLUTION 1445 assumption of the title of king. The Houses supported James, and passed a bill of attainder against the Duke. The gentry, still true to the cause of Mary and of William, held stubbornly aloof ; while the Guards hurried to the scene of the revolt, and the militia gathered to the royal standard. Foiled in an attempt on Bristol and Bath, Monmouth fell back on Bridgevvater, and flung himself liRIDGEWATER HIGH CROSS. Proceedings of Somerset A rclueological Society. in the night of the sixth (;f July, 1685, on the King's forces, which lay encamped on Sedgemoor. The surprise failed ; and the brave peasants and miners who followed the Duke, checked in their advance by a deep drain which crossed the moor, were broken after a shfjrt resistance by the royal horse. Their leader fled from the field, and after a vain effort to escape from the realm, was captured and .sent pitilessly to the bUjck. Never had l^ngland shown a firmer Io\'alty ; but its io^ahy was changed into lioiror b\' the terrible measures of repression 5 A 2 Sec. VI The Second .Stuakt 'I'VKANNY 1682 TO 1688 The Bloody Circuit '44^ HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VI whicli followcd Oil thc victory of Scdgcmoor. Even North, the The Loitl Keeper, a servile tool of the Crown, protested against the Stuart Tyranny 1682 TO I68S SCYTHES TICKED UP AT SEDGEMOOR ; USED AS WEAPONS liV THE PEASA.NTS. Tower of London. hcence and bloodshed in which the troops were suffered to indulge after the battle. His protest liowevcr was clisregarded, and he withdrew broken-hearted from the Court to die. James was, in fact, resolved on a far more terrible vengeance ; and the Chief- BATTLE OF SEDGEMOOR. ^^ En^clants Schomvtoncel" &^c., Aiiisterdaiii, 1690. Justice Jeffreys, a man of great natural powers but of violent temper, was sent to earn the Seals by a series of judicial murders which have left his name a byword for cruelt}-. Three hundred and fift\- rebels were hanged in the " Bloody Circuit," as Jeffreys made his way through Dorset and Somerset. More than eight IX THE REVOLUTION 1447 hundred were sold into slavery beyond sea. A yet larger number sec. vi were whipped and imprisoned. The Queen, the maids of honour, the courtiers, even the Judge himself, made shameless profit from the sale of pardons. What roused pity above all were the cruelties wreaked upon women. Some were scourged from market-town to market-town. Mrs. Lisle, the wife of one of the Regicides, was The Second Stuart Tyranny 1682 TO 1688 l.OKD JKKFRKY.S AS CHIKK JUSTICE. From an enj^raving by R. iriu'le, after S/r Godfrey Knellc sent to the block at Winchester for harbouring a rebel. Elizabeth Gaunt, for the same act of womanly charit)', was burned at T)'burn. Pity turned into horror when it was found that cruelty such as this was avowed and sanctioned b}- the King. Even the cold heart of General Churchill, to whose energy the victory of Sedgenioor had mainly been owing, rcv(jlted at the ruthlcssness with which James turned away from all ai)peals for mcic)-. " This marble," he cried as he struck the chininc)'-piccc on which he leant, " is not harder CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1449 than the King's heart." But it was soon plain that the terror which the butchery was meant to strike into the people was part of a larger purpose. The revolt was made a pretext for a vast increase of the standing arm}'. Charles, as we have seen, had silently and cautiously raised it to nearly ten thousand men ; James raised it at one swoop to twenty thousand. The employ- ment of this force was to be at home, not abroad, for the hope of an English policy in foreign affairs had already faded away. In the designs which James had at heart he could look for no consent from Parliament ; and however his pride revolted against a depend- ence on France, it was onh' b)' French gold and French soldiers that he could hope to hold the Parliament permanently at ba}-. A week therefore after his accession he assured Lewis that his gratitude and devotion to him equalled that of Charles himself. " Tell your master," he said to the French ambassador, "that with- out his protection I can do nothing. He has a right to be con- sulted, and it is my wish to consult him, about everything." The pledge of subserviency was rewarded with the promise of a subsidy, and the promise was received with the strongest expres- sions of delight and servility. Never had the secret league with France seemed so full of danger to English religion. Europe had long been trembling at the ambition of Lewis ; it was trembling now at his bigotry. He had proclaimed warfare against civil libert}- in his attack upon Sec. VI The Second Stuart TVR.\NNY 1682 The Tyranny ■ )!• I.ULIS XIV. COMMF.MORATINO REVOCATKj.N OF NANTES, 1685. Holland ; he declared war at this moment upon religi(jus freedom b\- revoking/ the Indict of Nantes, the measure ])v which Ilcnr\- 145° HISTORY OF 'I'HK KXCLISll PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VI The Second Stuakt 'rVRAN.NY 1682 TO 1688 the Fourth after his abandonincnt of Protestantism secured tolera- tion and the free exercise of their worship for his Protestant sub- jects. It had been respected b>- RichcHeu even in his victory over HOUSE OK HUGUENOT SILK-WKAVER, CAXTEKliURV. the Huguenots, and only h'c^htly tampered with by Mazarin. But from the beginning of his reign Lewis had resolved to set aside its provisions, and his revocation of it in 1685 was only the natural IX THE REVOLUTION close of a progressive system of persecution. The Revocation was followed by outrages more cruel than even the bloodshed of Alva. Dragoons were quartered on Protestant families, women were flung from their sick-beds into the streets, children were torn from their mothers' arms to be brought up in Catholicism, ministers were sent 1451 Sec. VI The Second Stuart 1 VRANNY 1682 1688 ./ixntcr in rl/irunsdltck iPrlnts cAl bkttYccc? <^ncrmr ojilkrj cJtufpGy:< cGauico jorh erf sen STAMPING CALICO. Temp. James II. liagford Collection, British Museum. to the galleys. In spite of the royal edicts, which forbade even flight to the victims of these horrible atrocities, a hundred thousand Protestants fled over the borders, and Holland, Switzerland, the i'alatinate, were filled willi I'Vcncli exiles. Thousands found refuge in i'jigland, and ihcir iiulustrs- founded in the fu-lds east of LoiKJon the silk- trade of .Spilalfields. lUit while I'lnglisliincn were rori: innocent xi. rixeiving the ambassador of james ii., 16S7. Wright, '-Account of the Earl of Castlcmainc's Embassy." 1688. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1453 looking- with horror on these events in France, James drew from Sec. vi them new hopes. In defiance of the law he was fillinsf his fresh The ^ Second regiments with Catholic officers, fie dismissed Halifax from the Stuart •^ lYKANNV Priv}- Council on his refusal to consent to a plan for repealing the 1682 TO Test Act. He met the Parliament with a haughty declaration that 168S whether legal or no his grant of commissions to Catholics must not 1686 be questioned, and with a demand of supplies for his new troops. Lo\-al as was the temper of the Houses, their alarm for the Church, their dread of a standing arm}% was }'et stronger than their loyalt)-. The Commons by the majority of a single vote deferred the grant of supplies till grievances were redressed, and demanded in their address the recall of the illegal commissions. The Lords took a bolder tone ; and the protest of the bishops against any infringe- ment of the Test Act was backed by the eloquence of Halifax. But both Houses were at once prorogued. The King resolved to obtain from the judges what he could not obtain from Parliament. He remodelled the bench b}' dismissing four judges who refused to lend themselves to his plans ; and their successors decided in the case of ^^"' ^ . Test Act Sir Edward Hales, a Catholic officer in the arm}-, that a roj^al dis- set aside pensation could be pleaded in bar of the Test Act. The principle laid down by the judges asserted the right of the King to dispense with penal laws according to his own judgment, and it was applied by James with a reckless impatience of all deccnc\- and self-restraint. Catholics were admitted into civil and militar)- offices without stint, and four Catholic peers were sworn as mem- bers of the Privy Council. The laws which forbade the presence of Catholic priests in the realm, or the open exercise of Catholic worship, were set at nought. A gorgeous chapel was opened in the palace of St. James for the worship of the King. Carmelites, Benedictines, P'ranciscans, appeared in their religious garb in the streets of Londrjii, and the Jesuits set up a crowded school in the Savoy. The quick growth of discontent at these acts would have James startled a wiser man into prudence, but James prided himself on an church obstinac}' which never ga\'e way ; and a riot which took ])lace on the opening of a fresh Catholic chapel in the Cit)' was foUowed 1))- thc establishment of a camp of thirteen thousand men at Ilounslow to overawe the capital. The course which James intended to jRADVALE ROMANVM IVX^TA MIS SALE EX DECRETO j§ACRO SANCTI Concilij Tridentini. !J. V. PONT, iMAX. jysSU'EOITUM, CLEMEiN ill. PRIMVM, NUNC DENOO, VRBANI PAPiE OCT A VI AiVCTORITATE RECOGNITVM. Cujus San^itas,ne vetus Graduale recuda- tur, gravi interminatione fanxit. CuJ adtUtus eft Cantus Miflamm omnium votivartjm, qui antchac dcCderabatur:itcm Cantus &i Modulationcs Kyrialcs , Hymni Angclici , Symboli Apoftolorum , ac oiuaiumprxterca qux inflagulis MiiSs pafllm dec^nc&ri foIcnt> ;:.': ! unrtnndcm, Sanctorum Mnnium Officia, quorum no- ii.a in Kjk w.iano Ro.nano Jcicnpca i egcriuntur. LUThTl/€ PARISIOUUM CLAUDlUM"-rOSSE , vi^ Jacobca fub ils^^o Columbarum. M. D C. L X V 1 I L '~~ ruM APPROBATION^- TITLE-PAGE OF MISSAL GIVEN BY JAMES H. TO JOHN BRENAN, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF CASHEL. Library of S. Patrick's Cathedral, Duhlin. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1455 VifsCiyncL aririiFH/ 1/ Pa. t. ' isls in I re I a nd . SATIRICAL IM.AV INC. -CARD. Temp. James II. British Museum. A Catholic, Lord T}'rconncll, was put at the head of the arm}-, and .set instantl)' about its re-ors^fanizatioii b)' cashiering Protestant officers and by admitting two thousand CathoHc natives into its ranks. Meanwhile James had begun in England a bold and systematic attack upon the Church. He re- garded his ecclesiastical supremacy as a wea])on providcntiall\- left to him for undoing the work which it had enabled his predecessors The Second Stiart Tyranny 1682 TO 1 688 follow in England was shown by the course he was following in the Sec. yi sister kingdoms. In Scotland he acted as a pure despot. He placed its government in the hands of two lords, Melfort and Perth, who had embraced his own religion, and put a Catholic in command of the Castle of Edinburgh. The Scotch Parliament had as \-et been the mere creature of the Crown, but servile as were its members there was a point at which their servility stopped. When James boldl)' required them to le- galize the toleration of Catholics, the}- re- fused to pass such an Act. It was in vain that the King tempted them to consent b}^ the offer of a free trade with England. " Shall wc sell our God .-* " was the in- dignant repl}'. James at once ordered the Scotch judges to treat all laws against Catho- lics as null and void, and his orders were obeyed. In Ireland his polic}- threw off even the disguise of law. Catholics were admitted by the King's command to the Coun- cil and to civil offices. 1456 HISTORY OF Till-: lA'Gl.ISH PEOPL?: chap. Sec. VI to do. UiulcT 1 Icnr\- iuul I^li/.;il)clh it had been used to turn the The Church of I'lii'dand (vom CathoHc to Protestant. Under James it Second Stuakt should be used to turn it back airain from Protestant to Catholic. Tyranny * 16S2 The High Commission indeed had been declared illegal by an 1685 Act of the Long Parliament, and this Act had been confirmed by The lliiili the Parliament of the Restoration, l^ut it was thought possible to ^"s'ion"' <-'vadc this Act by omitting from the instructions on which the 1686 Commission acted the extraordinary powers and jurisdictions by which its predecessor had given offence. With this reserve, seven commissioners were appointed for the government of the Church, with JefTre}s at their head ; and the first blow of the Commission was at the l^ishop of London. James had forbidden the clergy to preach against " the King's religion," and ordered Bishop Compton to suspend a London vicar who set this order at defiance. The l^ishop's refusal was punished by his own suspension. But the pressure of the Commission only drove the clergy to a bolder defiance of the royal will. Sermons against superstition were preached from every pulpit ; and the two most famous divines of the day, Tillotson and Stillingfleet, put themselves at the head of a host of controversialists who scattered pamphlets and tracts from every printing press. Declara- It was in vain that the bulk of the Catholic gentry stood aloof Indul- '^'^^^ predicted the inevitable reaction his course must bring about, gence qj- ^.j^^^- Rome itself counselled greater moderation. James was infatuated with what seemed to be the success of his enterprises. He looked on the opposition he experienced as due to the in- fluence of the High Church Tories who had remained in power since the reaction of i68i, and these he determined " to chastise." The Duke of Oueensberry, the leader of this party in Scotland, was driven from office. Tyrconnell, as we have seen, was placed as a check on Ormond in Ireland. In England James resolved to show the world that even the closest ties of blood were as nothing to him if they conflicted with the demands of his faith. His earlier marriage with Anne Hyde, the daughter of Clarendon, bound both the Chancellor's sons to his fortunes ; and on his accession he had sent his elder brother-in-law, llcnr\-, P^arl of Clarendon, as Lord- Lieutenant to Ireland, and raised the younger, Laurence, Earl of Rochester, to the post of Lord Treasurer. But Rochester was now IX THE REVOLUTION 1457 told that the King could not safely entrust so great a charge to any one who did not share his sentiments on religion, and on his refusal to abandon his faith he was deprived of the White Staff. His brother, Clarendon, shared his fall. A Catholic, Lord Bellasys, became First Lord of the Treasury, which was put into commission after Rochester's removal ; and another Catholic, Lord Arundel, became Lord Privy Seal, while Father Petre, a Jesuit, was called to the Privy Council. One official after another who refused to aid in the repeal of the Test Act was dismissed. In defiance of the law the Nuncio of the Pope was received in state at Windsor. But even James could hardly fail to perceive the growth of public discontent. If the great Tory nobles were staunch for the Crown, they were as resolute English- men in their hatred of mere tyranny as the Whigs them- selves. James gave the Duke of Norfolk the sword of State to carry before him as he went to Mass. The Duke stopped at the Chapel door. " Your father would have gone further," said the King. " Your Majesty's father was the better man," re- plied the Duke, " and he would not have gone so far." The young Duke of Somerset was ordered to introduce the Nuncio into the Presence Chamber. " I am advised," he answered, " that I cannot obey your Majesty without breaking the law." " Do you not know that I am above the law.-*" James asked angrily. ' Your Majesty may be, but I am not," retorted the Duke. He was dismis.sed from his post ; but the spirit of resistance spread fast. In spite of the King's letters the governors of the Charter House, wlu) numbered among them some of the greatest I'Jiglish nobles, refused to admit a Catholic to the benefits of the founda- UAl.liKKl- FROM ROME. Seventeenth C"entury. Tower of London. Sec. VI The .Second Stuart 1 YRANNY 1682 TO 1688 1687 The Tory nobles X458 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. VI tion. Thc mo.st devoted lo\alists bei;an to murmur when James ^K demanded apostasy as a proof of their loyalt)-. He had soon in Stuari' fact to abandon all hope of bringing the Church or thc Tories over TyRANN\ ^ 1 1 -VT 1682 to his will. He turned, as Charles had turned, to the Noncon- 168S formists, and published in 1687 a Declaration of Indulgence which Th,. suspended the operation of the penal laws against Nonconformists A-o„-a»i- ^^j^j Catholics alike, and of every Act which imposed a test as Jo nil I sis ' ■' a qualification for office in Church or State. The temptation to accept the Indulgence was great, for since the fall of Shaftesbury persecution had fallen heavily on the Protestant dissidents, and we can hardl}' wonder that the Nonconformists wavered for a time, or that numerous addresses of thanks were presented to James. But the great bod}' of them, and all the more venerable names among them, remained true to the cause of freedom. Baxter, Howe, and Bunyan all refused an Indulgence which could only be purchased by the violent overthrow of thc law. It was plain that the attempt to divide the forces of Protestantism had utterly failed, and that the onh' mode of securing his end was to procure a repeal of the Test Act from Parliament itself James The temper of the existing Houses however remained Univer- absolutely opposed to thc King's project. He therefore dissolved sities (.|.j^. Parliament, and summoned a new one. But no free Parlia- ment could be brought, as he knew, to consent to the repeal. The Lords indeed could be swamped by lavish creations of new peers. " Your troop of horse," his minister. Lord Sunderland, told Churchill, " shall be called up into the House of Lords." But it was a harder matter to secure a compliant House of Commons, The Lord-Lieutenants were directed to bring about such a " regulation " of thc governing bod}' in boroughs as would ensure thc return of candidates pledged to the repeal of the Test, and to question every magistrate in their count}' as to his vote. Half of them at once refused, and a long list of great nobles — the Earls of Oxford, Shrewsbury, Dorset, Derb}', Pembroke, Rutland, Abergavenny, Thanet, Northampton, and Abingdon — were dismissed from their Lord-Lieutenancies. The justices when questioned simpK" replied that they would vote according to their consciences, and send members to Parliament who would protect the Protestant religion. After repeated " regulations " it was IX THE REVOLUTION 1459 bTUART r YUAN NY 1688 found impossible to form a corporate body which would return Sec. vi representatives willing to comply with the royal will. All thought ^'^'he of a Parliament had to be abandoned ; and even the most bigoted courtiers counselled mofleration at this proof of the stubborn ' opposition which James must prepare to encounter from the peers, the gentry, and the trading classes. The clergy alone still hesitated in any open act of resistance. Even the tyranny of the Commission failed to rouse into open disaffection men who had been preaching Sunday after Sunday the doctrine of passive obedience to the worst of kings. But James cared little for passive obedience. He looked on the refusal of the clergy to support his plans as freeing him from his pledge to maintain the Church as established by law ; and he resolved to attack it in the great institutions which had till now been its strongholds. To secure the Universities for Catholicism was to seize the only training schools which the clergy possessed. Cambridge indeed escaped easily. A Benedictine monk who presented himself with royal letters recommending himi for the degree of a Master of Arts was rejected on his refusal to sign the Articles : and the Vice- Chancellor paid for the rejection by dismissal from his office. But a violent and obstinate attack was directed against Oxford. The Master of University College, who declared himself a convert, was authorized to retain his post in defiance of the law. jMassey, a Roman Catholic, was presented by the Crown to the Deanery of Christ Church. Magdalen was the wealthiest Oxford College, and James in 1687 recommended one Farmer, a Catholic of infamous life and not even qualified by statute for the office, to its vacant headship. The Fellows remonstrated, and on the rejection of their remonstrance chose tlough, one of their own number, as their President. The Ecclesiastical Commission declared the election void ; and James, shamed out of his first candidate, recommended a .second, Parker, Bishop of O.xford, a Catholic in heart and the meanest of his courtiers. But the P'ellows held stubbornly to their legal head. It was in vain that the King visited Oxford, summoned them to his presence, and rated them as they knelt before him like schoolboys. " I am King," he said, " I will be obeyed ! Go to your chapel this instant, and elect the Bishop ! Let tho.sc who refuse look to it, for thc\- shall feel the Vol. IV— Part 32 5 I; CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1461 whole weight of my hand ! " It was seen that to give Magdalen sec. vi as well as Christ Church into Catholic hands was to turn Oxford o'^Jl^^ into a Catholic seminar}', and the King's threats were disregarded, -ly^^^^y But thev were soon carried out. A special Commission visited the ^^^^ ' '■ TO University, pronounced Hough an intruder, set aside his appeal to 1688 the law, burst open the door of his President's house to install Parker in his place, and on their refusal to submit deprived the Fellows of their fellowships. The expulsion of the Fellows was followed on a like refusal by that of the Demies. Parker, who died immediately after his installation, was succeeded by a Roman Catholic bishop vi partibus, Bonaventure Giffard, and twelve Catholics were admitted to fellowships in a single day. Meanwhile James clung to the hope of finding a compliant The Seven Parliament, from which he might win a repeal of the Test Act. Bishops In face of the dogged opposition of the countr\' the elections had been adjourned ; and a renewed Declaration of Indulgence was .l/;77i68S intended as an appeal to the nation at large. At its close he promised to summon a Parliament in November, and he called on the electors to choose such members as would bring to a successful end the policy he had begun. His resolve, he said, was to estab- lish universal liberty of conscience for all future time. It was in this character of a royal appeal that he ordered every clergyman to read the declaration during divine service on two successive Sunda}-s. Little time was given for deliberation, but little time was needed. The clerg}- refused almost to a man to be the instru- ments of their own humiliation. The Declaration was read in only four of the London churches, and in these the congregation flocked out of church at the first words of it. Nearly all of the country clergy refused to obey the ro}-al orders. The Bishops went with the rest of the clerg}-. A few da\-s before the appointed Sunda\- Archbishop Sancroft called his suffragans together, and the six who were able to appear at Lambeth signed a temperate protest to the King, in which the)' declined to publish an illegal Declara- tion. " It is a standard of rebellion," James exclaimed as the Primate presented tlie paper ; and the resistance of the clcrg\- was no sooner announced to him than he determined to wreak his vengeance on the prelates who had signed the protest. He ordered the I-'cclcsiastical Commissioners to deprive Ihem of their sees, but 5 li 2 1462 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VI in this matter even the Commissioners .shrank from obeying hirn. The The Chancellor, Lord Jeffreys, advised a prosecution for libel as an Sti-art 'Tyk.\nny 1682 THE SEVEN BISHOPS. Picture in National Portrait Gallery. easier mode of punishment : and the bishops, who refused to give bail, were committed on this charge to the Tower. They passed to THE REVOLUTION 1463 their prison amidst the shouts of a great multitude, the sentinels knelt for their blessing as they entered its gates, and the soldiers of the garrison drank their healths. So threatening was the temper of the nation that his ministers pressed James to give wa}'. But his obstinacy grew with the danger. " Indulgence," he said, " ruined my father ; " and on the 29th of June the bishops appeared as criminals at the bar of the King's Bench. The jury had been packed, the judges were mere tools of the Crown, but judges and jury were alike overawed b}- the indignation of the people at large. No sooner had the foreman of the jur\- uttered the words " Not guilty ' than a roar of applause burst from the crowd, and horse- men spurred along ever}- road to carry over the countr}- the news of the acquittal. Sec. VI The Second Stuart TVR.\NNV 1682 TO 1688 THK SEVKX niSIKM'S CDI.NG To THK •|T)\VKK. hiigelands Cothiiioist en Vryheid hersteld door den Ileere Prince van Oremjen," Amsterdam, 1689. cow If , MEDAL COMMEMOKATING TKi.^.- ■..,..1.. ol DENMARK OVER SWEDEN, 1677. (Reverse J CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1465 Sec. VII William OF Orange Section VII. — "William of Orange \Autlioritics. — As before] Amidst the tumult of the Plot and the Exclusion Bill the wiser among English statesmen had fixed their hopes steadily on the succession of Mary, the elder daughter and heiress of James. The tyranny of her father's reign made this succession the hope of the people at large. But to Europe the importance of the change, whenever it should come about, lay not so much in the succession of Hilary, as in the new power which such an event would give to her husband, William Prince of Orange. We have come in fact to a moment when the struggle of England against the aggression of its King blends with the larger struggle of Europe against the aggres- sion of Lewis the Fourteenth, and it is only by a rapid glance at the political state of the Continent that we can understand the real nature and results of the Revolution which drove James from the throne. At this moment I'rance was the dominant power in Christen- dom. The religious wars which began with the Reformation had broken the .strength of the nations around her. Spain was no longer able to fight the battle of Catholicism. The Peace of Westphalia, by the independence it gave to the German princes and the jealousy it kept ali\e between the Protestant and Catholic powers of Germany, destroyed the strength of the Empire. The German branch of the House of Austria, spent with the long struggle of the Thirty Years' War, had enough to do in battling hard against the advance of the Turks from Hungary on Vienna. The victories of Gustavus and of the generals whom he formed had been dearly purchased by the exhaustion of Sweden. The L^nited Provinces were as yet hardly regarded as a great power, and were trammelled by their contest with ICngland for the empire of the seas. France alone profited by the general wreck. The wise policy of Hcnr)' the Fourth in .securing religious peace by a grant William and Europe The Great- ness of France C Ev, CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1467 of toleration to the Protestants had undone the ill effects of its Sec. vn relicrious wars. The Huguenots were still numerous south of the Wiluam O O Qp Loire, but the loss of their fortresses had turned their energies into Orange the peaceful channels of industr\- and trade. Feudal disorder was roughly put down by Richelieu, and the polic\" which gathered all local power into the hands of tl)e crown, though fatal in the end to the real welfare of France, gave it for the moment an air of good government, and a command over its internal resources which no . other country could boast. Its compact and fertile territory, the natural activity and enterprise of its people, and the rapid growth of its commerce and manufactures, were sources of natural wealth which even its heax'v taxation failed to check, hi the latter half of the seventeenth century France was looked upon as the wealthiest power in Europe. The yearly income of the French crown was double that of Eng- land, and c\'en Lewis the Four- teenth trusted as much to the credit of his treasury as to the glory of his arms. " After all," he said, when the fortunes of war began to turn against him, " it is the last louis d'or which must win ! " It was in fact this supcriorit}' in wealth which enabled France to set on foot forces such as had never been seen in Europe since the downfall of Rome. At the opening of the reign of Lewis the Fourteenth its army mustered a hundred thousand men. With the war against Holland it rose to nearh' two lumdrcd thousand. In the last struggle against the Grand Alliance there was a time when it counted nearly half a million of men in arms. Nor was I-'rance content with these enormous land forces. Since the ruin of Spain the fleets of Holland and of ICngland had alone dispulctl the empire of the seas. Under Richelieu and Ala/.arin T'rance could hardly be looked upon as a nawal power. Ikit the earl\- years of Lewis saw the creation (jf a na\\- of 100 men-of-war, and CARDINAL MAZARIN. Front a miniature by Petitot, in the South Kensington Mnsemii. MARSHAL Tl'RF.XNF. From a miniature hy P. Scuin. in the South Kensington Mnsctun. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1469 the fleets of France soon held their own against England or Sfc. vii the Dutch. '^''^';'^^' Such a power would have been formidable at any time ; but it '^i^ge was doubly formidable when directed by statesmen who in know- ^he^Four- ledge and ability were without rivals in Europe. No diplomatist teenth LOUIS XIV. From ait original engraving iy R . Xanictiil, 1670. could compare with Lionne, no war minister with Louvois, no financier with Colbert. Their young master, Lewis the Fourteenth, bigoted, narrow-minded, commonplace as he was, without personal honour or personal courage, without gratitude and without pit)-, insane in his pride, insatiable in his vanity, brutal in his selfishness, had still many of the qualities of a great ruler: imlustr)-, patience, LOUIS II., PRINCE DE CO.NDE. From a i>ti>iiatnre in the South Kensington I^Inseuin. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION J471 quickness of resolve, firmness of purpose, a capacity for discerning sei. v:i oreatness and using it, an immense self-belief and self-confidence, wilmam and a temper utterly destitute indeed of real greatness, but with a Orange dramatic turn for seeming to be great. As a politician Lewis had simply to reap the harvest which the two great Cardinals who went before him had sown. Both had used to the profit of France the exhaustion and dissension which the wars of religion had brought upon Europe. Richelieu turned the scale against the House of Austria by his alliance with Sweden, with the LJnited Provinces, and with the Protestant princes of Germany ; and the two great treaties by which Mazarin ended the Thirty Years' War, the Treaty of Westphalia and the Treaty of the Pyrenees, left the Empire disorganized and Spain powerless. From that moment France indeed Spain sank into a strange decrepitude. Robbed of the '"" ' ''^""" chief source of her wealth by the independence of Holland, weakened at home by the revolt of Portugal, her infantry- annihilated by Conde in his victory of Rocroi, her fleet ruined by the Dutch, her best blood drained away to the Indies, the energies of her people destroyed by the suppression of all libert}', civil or religious, her intellectual life crushed by the Inquisition, her industry crippled by the expulsion of the Moors, by financial oppression, and by the folly of her colonial system, the kingdom which under Philip the Second had aimed at the empire of the world lay helpless and exhausted under Philip the Fourth. The aim of Lewis from 1661, the year when he really became master of France, was to carry on the policy of his predecessors, and above all to complete the ruin of Spain. The conquest of the Spanish provinces in the Netherlands would carry his border to the Scheldt. A more distant hope lay in the probable extinction of the Austrian line which now sat on the throne of Spain. By securing the succession to that throne for a French prince, not only Castillo and Aragon with the Spanish dependencies in Italy and the Nether- lands, but the Spanish empire in the New World would be added to the dominions of j-'rance. Nothing could save .Si)ain but a luiion of the European powers, and to prevent this union by his negotia- tions was a work at which Lewis tfjiled for years. The intervention of the Empire was guarded against Ijy a renewal of the old alHanccs between I''rance and the lesser (jern)an piinces. A league 1472 HISTORY OF THJ': KNCiLISH l']:OPLK chap. Orangf. Sec^^ii with the Turks gave Austria enough to do on licr eastern border. ^^'of''^^' ^^^^ *^'^ league with Sweden, the old friendship with Holland were skilfull)- maintained. The polic)' of Charles the Second bound Englantl to the side of Lewis. At last it seemed that the moment JOHN DE AVITT. From a conti'iit/iorary engraving by Laiithey't I'ischer. for which he had waited liad come, and the signing of the Treat}- of Breda gave an opportunit\- for war of which Lewis availed him- self in 1667. But the suddenness and completeness of the French success awoke a general terror before which the skilful diplomac\- of Charles s:ave wa\-. Holland was roused to a sense of danger at IX THE REVOLUTION 147^ home by the appearance of French arms on the Rhine. England Sec. vii woke from her letharo"\- on the French seizure of the coast-towns wilha.m •-'■' OF of Flanders. Sweden joined the two Protestant powers in the O'^ll'"' Triple Alliance ; and the dread of a wider league forced Lewis to content himself with the southern half of Flanders, and the '668 possession of a string of fortresses which practically left him master of the Netherlands. Lewis was maddened by the check. He had alwa}-s disliked William the Dutch as Protestants and Republicans ; he hated them now as Orange an obstacle which must be taken out of the way ere he could resume his projects upon Spain. Four years were spent in preparations for a decisive blow. The P'rench army was gradually raised to a hundred and eighty thousand men. Colbert created a fleet which rivalled that of Holland in number and equipment. Sweden was again won over. England was again secured b)' the Treaty of Dover.- Meanwhile Holland lay w^rapped in a false security. The French alliance had been its traditional polic\' since the days of Henry the Fourth, and it was especially dear to the party of the great merchant class which had mounted to power on the fall of the House of Orange. John dc Witt, the leader of this party, though he had been forced to conclude the Triple Alliance by the advance of Lewis to the Rhine, still clung blindl}- to the friendship of France. His trust only broke down when the French army crossed the Dutch border in 1672, and the glare of its watch-fires was seen from the walls of Amsterdam. For the moment Holland la}- crushed at the feet of Lewis, but the arrogance of the conqueror roused again the stubborn courage which had wrung victory from Alva and worn out the pride of Philip the Second. De Witt was murdered in a popular tumult, 1672 and his fall called William, the Prince of Orange, to the head of the Republic. Though the new Stadholder had hardly reached manhood, his great qualities at once made themselves felt. His earlier life had schooled him in a wcjnderful self-control. He had been left fatherless and all but friendless in childhood, he had been bred among men who looked on his very existence as a danger to the State, his words had been watched, his looks noted, his friends jealously withdrawn. In such an atmosphere the b()\- grew up silent, war\', self-contained, grave in tenijjcr, coUl in tlemcanour, 1474 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VII blunt and even repulsive in addre.ss. He was weak and sickly William from Ilis cradlc, and manhood brought \\ith it an asthma and OF Orangk consumption which shook his frame with a constant cough ; WILLIAM III. WHEN A CHILD. Ffoin an etching hy Leon Richeton, in " Tlie Portfolio" of a picture by Rembrandt, at Altliorp. his face was sullen and bloodless and scored with deep lines which told of ceaseless pain. VtwX. beneath this cold and sickly presence lay a fiery and commanding temper, an immovable courage, and a political ability of the highest order. William was IX THE REVOLUTION U75 a born statesman. Neglected as his education had been in other ways, for he knew nothing of letters or of art, g he had been carefully trained in politics by John de Witt : and the wide knowledge with which in his first address to the States-General the young Stadholdcr reviewed the general state of P^urope, the cool courage with which he calculated the chances of the struggle, at once won him the trust of his countrymen. Their trust was soon rewarded. Holland was saved, and province after province won back from the arms of France, by William's dauntless resolve. Like his great ancestor William the Silent, he was a luckless commander, and no genei'al had to bear more frequent defeats. But he profited by defeat as other men profit by victory. His brav-ery indeed was of that nobler cast which rises to its height in moments of ruin and dismay. The coolness with which, boy-general as he was, he rallied his broken squadrons amidst the rout of Seneff, and wrested from Conde at the last the fruits of his victory, moved his veteran opponent to a generous admiration. It was in such moments indeed that the real temper of the man broke through the veil of his usual reserve. A strange light flashed from his eyes as soon as he was under fire, and in the terror and confusion of defeat his manners took an ease and gaiety that charmed every soldier around him. The political ability of William was seen in the skill with which he drew Spain and the House of Austria into a coalition against France, a union which laid the foundation of the Grand Alliance. But France was still matchless in arms, and the effect of her victories was seconded by the selfish- ness of the allies, and above all by the treacherous diplomacy of Charles the Second. William was forced to con. sent in 1678 to the Treaty of Nimcguen, which left France dominant over ]un'0])c as she Irul never been V(JL. IV— Taki 32 5 (■ DUTCH MUSKK.r. Seventeenth Century, Tower of London. Sec. VII William OF Orange 1476 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VII before. Holland indeed was saved from the revenge of Lewis, but William frcsh si)cm1s had been wrested from Sixain, and Franche-Comte, OF ' ' Orangi; ■^vhieh had l)een restored at the close of the former war, was William i-^taincd at the end of this. Above all France overawed Europe and Charles bv thc darincf and success with which she had faced single-handed II. the witic coalition against her. Her King's arrogance became unbounded. Lorraine was turned into a subject state. Genoa FRENCH riSTOLIERS AT THK STORMING OF AERDENBURGH, 1672. F}-oin Contemporary Dutch Eng7-aving. was bombarded, and its Doge forced to seek pardon in thc antechambers of Versailles. The Pope was humiliated by thc march of an arm}- upon Rome to avenge a slight offered to the French ambassador. The ICmjjire was outraged by a shameless seizure of Imperial fiefs in Elsass and elsewhere. The whole Protestant world was defied by the persecution of the Huguenots which was to culminate in the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. In thc mind of Lewis peace meant a series of outrages on thc THE REVOLUTION 1477 powers around him ; but every outrage helped the cool and silent Sec. vii adversary who was looking on from the Hague to build up that William Great Alliance of all Europe from which alone he looked for an\' Orange effectual check to the ambition of France. The experience of the last war had taught W^iiliam that of such an alliance England must form a part, and the efforts of the Prince ever since the peace had been directed to secure her co-operation. A reconciliation of the King with his Parliament was an indispensable step towards freeing Charles from his dependence on France, and it was such a reconciliation that William at first strove to bring about ; but he was for a long time foiled by the steadiness with which Charles clung to the power whose aid was needful to carry out the schemes which he was contemplating. The change of policy however which followed on the fall of the Cabal and the entry of Danby into power raised new hopes in William's mind ; and his marriage 1677 with Mary dealt Lewis what proved to be a fatal blow. James was without a son, and the marriage with Mar\' would at any rate ensure William the aid of England in his great enterprise on his father-in-law's death. But it was impossible to wait for that event, and though the Prince used his new position to bring Charles round to a decided policy his efforts remained fruitless. The storm of the Popish Plot complicated his position. \n the earlier stages of the Exclusion Bill, when the Parliament seemed resolved simply to pass over James and to seat Mary at once on the throne after her uncle's death, William stood apart from the struggle, doubtful of its issue, though prepared to accept the good luck if it came to him. l^ut the fatal error of Shaftesbury in advancing the claims of Monmouth forced him into action. To preserve his wife's right of succession, with all the great issues which were to come of it, no other course was left than to ad()pt the cause of the Duke of York. In the crisis of the struggle, therefore, William threw his whole weight on the side of James. The eloquence of Halifax secured the rejection of the IC.xclusion Jiill. and Halifax was but the mouthpiece of William. ]^ut while England was seething with the madness of the William Popish JMot and of the royalist reaction, the great lunoijcan jamcs II. struggle was drawing nearer and nearer. The patience of Germany was worn out b) the ceaseless aggressions of Lc-wis, 5 (^ -' CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION i479 Okange and in 1686 its princes had bound themselves at Augsburg to Sec. vii resist all further encroachments on the part of France. From that Wili.jam moment war became inevitable, and William watched the course of his father-in-law with redoubled anxiety. His efforts to ensure English aid had utterly failed. James had renewed his brother's secret treat}- with France, and plunged into a quarrel with his people which of itself would have prevented him from giving any aid in a struggle abroad. The Prince could only silently look on, with a desperate hope that James might yet be brought to a nobler policy. He refused all encouragement to the leading malcontents who were already calling on him to interfere in arms. On the other hand he declined to support the King in his schemes for the abolition of the Test. If he still cherished hopes of bringing about a peace between the King and people which might enable him to enlist England in the Grand Alliance, they vanished in 1687 before the Declaration of Indulgence. It was at this m.oment that James called on him to declare himself in favour of the abolition of the penal laws and of the Test. But simul- taneously with the King's appeal came letters of warning and promises of support from the leading English nobles. Some, like the Hydes, simply assured him of their friendship. The Bishop of London added promises of support. Others, like Devonshire, Nottingham, and Shrewsbury, cautiously or openly warned the Prince against compliance with the King's demand. Lord Churchill announced the resolve of Mary's sister Anne to stand b)- the cause of Protestantism. Danby, the leading repre- sentative of the great Tory part}-, sent urgent warnings. The letters dictated William's answer. No one. he trul}^ protested, loathed religious persecution more than he himself did, but in rcla.xing political disabilities James called on him to countenance an attack on his own religion. " I cannot," he ended, '' concur in what your Majesty desires of mc." But William still shrank from the plan of an intervention in arms. General as the disaffection undoubtedl}' was, the position of James seemed fairly secure. He counted on the aid of France. He had an army of twenty thou- sand men. Scotland, disheartened by the failure of Arg}'li's rising, could give no such aid as it gave to the Long I'arliamcnt. Ireland was ready to throw a Catholic arni}- (mi the western coast. It was y ^ CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION doubtful if in England itself disaffection would turn into actual Sec. vii rebellion. The " Bloody Circuit " had left its terror on the Whigs, wjlliam J ^ OF The Tories and the Churchmen, angered as they were, were Orange hampered by their doctrine of non-resistance. William's aim therefore was to discourage all violent counsels, and to confine himself to organizing such a general opposition as would force James by legal means to reconcile himself to the country, to abandon his policy at home and abroad, and to join the alliance against France. But at this moment the whole course of William's policy was The In- changed b)' an unforeseen event. His own patience and that of the "Citation nation rested on the certainty of Mary's succession. But in the midst of the King's struggle with the Church it was announced that the Queen was again with child. The news was received with 1688 general unbelief, for five years had passed since the last pregnancy of Mary of Modena. But it at once forced on a crisis. If, as the Catholics joyously foretold, the child turned out a boy, and, as was certain, was brought up a Catholic, the highest Tory had to resolve at last whether the t)^ranny under which England lay .should go on for ever. The hesitation of the country was at an end. Danby, loyal above all to the Church and firm in his hatred of subservience to France, answered for the Tories ; Compton for the High Churchmen, goaded at last into rebellion by the Declara- tion of Indulgence. The Earl of Devonshire, the Lord Cavendish of the Exclusion struggle, answered for the Nonconformists, who were satisfied with William's promise to procure them toleration, as well as for the general body of the Whigs. The announcement of the birth of a Prince of Wales was followed ten daj-s after by a ^,,,,^ ^^ formal invitation to William to intervene in arms for the restora- tion of h-nglish lihcrt\- and the protection of the Protestant religion ; it was signed by the representatives of the great parties now united against a common danger, and by some others, and was carried to the Hague by Herbert, the most popular of ICnglish , ^^^. ,^ seamen, who had been dei)ri\C(l of his connnand for a refusal to vote against the Test. The Imitation called on William to land with an army strong en(;ugh to justify thost- who signed it in rising in arms. It was .sent from London on the tlay after the aciiuittal of the Bishops. The general excitement, the shouts ol tlic boats 1482 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. vii which covcrcd the river, the bonfires in ever\- street, showed indeed William that the countr\- was on the eve of revolt. The army itself, on OF Oranck -which James had implicill\- relied, suddcnl}- .showed its sympathy ^{"■' , with the people, lames was at Hounslow when the news of the Discontent vcrdict reached him, and as he rode from the camp he heard a great shout behind him. "What is that.'" he askxd. "It is nothing," was the rcpl)-, " onl\- the soldiers are glad that the Bi.shops are acquitted ! " " Do you call that nothing ? " grumbled the Kin-, and he dismissed Sunderland wiTITam from office. In answer to a declaration from the Prince of Orange, Or^ni;k which left the question of the legitimacy of the Trincc of Wales to Parliament, he produced before the peers who were in London proofs of the birth of his child. But concessions and proofs came _ The too late. Detained by ill winds, beaten back on its first venture b)- AV.W//V a violent storm, W illiam s fleet of six hundred transports, escorted b\- fift\' men-of-war, anchored on the fifth of November in Torbay ; and his army, thirteen thousand men strong, entered Exeter amidst the shouts of its citizens. His coming had not been looked for in the West, and for a week no great landowner joined him. But nobles and squires soon flocked to his camp, and the adhesion of Plymouth secured his rear. Insurrection broke out in Scotland. Danby, dashing at the head of a hundred horsemen into York, ga\-e the signal for a rising. The militia met his appeal with shouts of " A free Parliament and the Protestant religion ! " Peers and gentry flocked to his standard ; and a march on Nottingham united his forces to those under Devonshire, who had mustered at Derby the great lords of the midland and eastern counties. Ever)-- wherc the revolt was triumphant. The garrison of Hull declared for a free Parliament. The Duke of Norfolk appeared at the head of three hundred gentlemen in the market place at Norwich. At Oxford townsmen and gownsmen greeted Lord Lovelace with uproarious welcome. Bristol threw open its gates to the Prince of Orange, who advanced steadily on Salisbury, where James had mustered his forces. But the King's army, broken by dissensions and mutual suspicions among its leaders, fell back in disorder ; and the desertion of Lord Churchill was followed by that of so many other officers that James abandoned the struggle in despair. He fled to London to hear that his daughter Anne had left St. James's to join Danby at Nottingham. " God help me," cried the wretched Flight of King, " for my own children have forsaken me!" His spirit was utterly broken ; and though he promised to call the Hou.ses together, and despatched commissioners to Hungerford to treat with William on the terms of a free Parliament, in his heart he had resolved on flight. Parliament, he said to the few who still clung to him, would force on him concessions he could not endure ; and lie only waited for news of the escape of his wife and child to make James IX THE REVOLUTION 148; his way to the Isle of Sheppey, where a hoy lay ready to carry him Sec. vii to France. Some roimh fishermen, who took him for a Jesuit, William ^ -'of prevented his escape, and a troop of Life Guards brought him Oraxge back in safety to London : but it was the policy of William and his advisers to further a flight which removed their chief difficult}- out of the wa}-. It would have been hard to depose James had he remained, and perilous to keep him prisoner: but the entr}- of the Dutch troops into London, the silence of the Prince, and an order to leave St. James's, filled the King with fresh terrors, and taking advantage of the means of escape which were almost openly placed at his disposal, James a second time quitted London and embarked on the 23rd of December unhindered for France. Before flying James had burnt most of the writs convoking the The Re- new Parliament, had disbanded his army, and destro}-ed so far as he could all means of government. For a few da\-s there was a wild burst of panic and outrage in London, but the orderly instinct of the people soon reasserted itself The Lords who were at the moment in London provided on their own authorit}' as Privy Councillors for the more pressing needs of administration, and resigned their authority into William's hands on his arrival. The difficulty which arose from the absence of any person legally authorized to call Parliament together was got over by convoking the House of Peers, and forming a second bod\' of all members who had sat in the Commons in the reign of Charles the Second, with the Aldermen and Common Councillors of London. Both bodies requested William to take on himself the provisional The Con- government of the kingdom, and to issue circular letters inviting -'^'n 'o" ^ ^ ' ^ 16S9 the electors of every town and county to send up representatives to a Convention which met in January, 1689. In the new Conven- tion both Houses were found equally resolved against an\- recall of or negotiation with the fallen King. They were united in en- trusting a provisional authority to the Prince of Orange. But with this step their unanimity ended. The Whigs, who formed a majorit}' in the Commons, voted a resolution which, illogical and inconsistent as it .seemed, was well adapted to unite in its favour every element of the opposition to James : the Churchman who was simply scared b)' his bigotry, the Tor\- who doubted the right i)f a nation to tlepose its King, the \\'Iiig who held the tlicorv of a CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1489 contract between King and People. They voted that King James, Sec. vii " having endeavoured to subvert the constitution of this kingdom wilham ^ _ ^ OF by breaking the original contract between King and People, and Orange by the advice of Jesuits and other wicked persons having violated the fundamental laws, and having withdrawn himself out of the kingdom, has abdicated the Government, and that the throne is thereby vacant." But in the Lords, where the Tories were still in the ascendant, the resolution was fiercely debated. Archbishop Sancroft with the high Tories held that no crime could bring about a forfeiture of the crown, and that James still remained King, but that his tyranny had given the nation a right to withdraw from him the actual exercise of government and to entrust his functions to a Regency. The moderate Tories under Danby's guidance admitted that James had ceased to be King, but denied that the throne could be vacant, and contended that from the moment of his abdication the sovereignty vested in his daughter Mary. It was in vain that the eloquence of Halifax backed the Whig peers in struggling for the resolution of the Commons as it stood. The plan of a Regency was lost by a single vote, and Danby's scheme was adopted by a large majority. But both the Tory courses found a sudden obstacle in William. He declined to be Regent. He had no mind, he said to Danby, to be his wife's gentleman- usher. Mar)-, on the other hand, refused to accept the crown save in conjunction with her husband. The two declarations put an end to the question. It was agreed that William and Mary should be acknowledged as joint sovereigns, but that the actual adminis- tration should rest with William alone. A Parliamentary Com- Dcdara- mittec in which the most active member was John Somers, a younir 'u"i°! iaw)-cr who had distinguished himself in the trial of the Bishops and who was destined to play a great part in later history, drew uj) a Declaration of Rights which was presented on February 1 3th to William and Mar)' by the two Houses in the banqueting-room at W'hitcliall. It recited the misgovernmcnt of James, his abdication, and the resolve of the Lords and Commons to assert the ancient rights and liberties of ]Migli.sh subjects. It condemned as illegal his establishment of an ecclesiastical commission, and his raising an army without Parliamentary sanction. It denied the right of any king to suspend ()\- dispense with laws, or to exact money, I490 HISTORY OF THE ExNGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. SecVII save by consent of rarliamcnt. It asscrlcd for the subject a right William to petition, to a frcc choicc of representatives in rarhamcnt, and to Orangk .^ j,j,,.,_. .^,^^j „^^>,■^^ifl,l administration of justice It declared the right GREAT SF.AL OF WILLIAM AND MARY. (Obverse.) of both Houses to Hbert\' of debate. It demanded securities for the free exercise of their religion b}- all Protestants, and bound the new sovereign to maintain the Protestant religion and the law and liberties of the realm. In full faith that these principles would be THE REVOLUTION 1491 accepted and maintained by William and Mary, it ended with sec. vii declaring; the Prince and Princess of Orange King- and Oueen William & ^ ^ — OF of England. At the close of the Declaration, Halifax, in the name Orange GREAT SEAL OF WILLIAM AND MARY. (Reverse.) of the Estates of the Realm, prayed them to receive the crown. William accepted the offer in his own name and his wife's, and declared in a few words the resolve f)f both to maintain the laws and to govern by advice of Parliament. Vol. IV— I'AKr 32 5 L) 1492 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. VIII The Grand Alliance 1689 ilgy Section VIII.— The Grand Alliance, 1689— 1697 [Authorities. — As before.] The The blunder of Lewis in choosing Germany instead of Holland AlHance for his point of attack was all but atoned for by the brilliant suc- cesses with which he opened the war. The whole country west of the Rhine was soon in his hands ; his armies were masters of the Palatinate, and penetrated even to Wurtcmberg. His hopes had never been higher than at the moment when the arrival of James at St. Germain dashed all hope to the ground. Lewis was at once thrown back on a war of defence, and the brutal ravages which marked the retreat of his armies from the Rhine revealed the bitter- ness with which his pride stooped to the necessity. The Palatinate was turned into a desert. The same ruin fell on the stately palace of the Elector at Heidelberg, on the venerable tombs of the Emperors at Speyer, on the town of the trader, on the hut of the vine-dresser. In accepting the English throne William had been moved not so much by personal ambition as by the prospect of firmly knitting together England and Holland, the two great Pro- testant powers whose fleets held the mastery of the sea, as his diplomac}- had knit all Germany together a year before in the Treaty of Augsburg. But the ad\'ance from such a union to the formation of the European alliance against France was still delayed b\' the reluctance of the two branches of the House of Austria in Germany and Spain to league with Protestant States against a Catholic King, while England cared little to join in an attack on France with the view of saving the liberties of Europe. All hesitation, however, passed away when the reception of James as still King of England at St. Germain gave England just ground for a declaration of war, a step in which it was soon followed by Holland, and the two countries at once agreed to stand by one another in their struggle against France. The adhesion of Spain and the Court of Vienna in 1689 to this agreement completed the Grand Alliance which William had designed ; and when Savoy joined the Allies France found herself girt in on every side save that of Switzerland with a IX THE REVOLUTION 1493 ring of foes. The Scandinavian kingdoms alone stood aloof from sec^iii the confederacy of Europe, and their neutrality was unfriendly to '^'^^^^.TcT France. Lewis was left without a single ally save the Turk : but 1689 1697 WILLIAM HI From a picture by Sir Godfrey Knelicr at Windsor Castle. the energy and quickness of movement which sprang from the con- centration of the power of France in a single hand still left the contest an erjual one. The I'.inpire was slow to nio\c : the C'ourt 5 i> 2 1494 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE Sec. VIII of Vienna was distracted by a war with the Turks ; Spain was all The Grand but Dowcrlcss ; Holland and Enfjland were alone earnest in the Allian'ce * ^ 1689 struggle, and iMigland coiikl as yet give little aid in the war. One TO 1697 English brigade, indeed, formed from the regiments raised by James, joined the Dutch army on the Sambre, and distinguished itself under Churchill, who had been rewarded for his treason by the title of Karl of ]\Larlborough, in a brisk skirmish \vith the enemy at \\\alcourt. ]-5ut William had as yet grave work to do at home, William In England not a sword had been drawn for James. In Scotland Scotland his tyranny had been yet greater than in England, and so far as the Lowlands went the fall of his tyranny was as rapid and complete. No sooner had he called his troops southward to meet William's invasion than Edinburgh rose in revolt. The western peasants were at once up in arms, and the Episcopalian clergy who had been the instruments of the Stuart misgovernment ever since the Restoration were rabbled and driven from their parsonages in every parish. The news of these disorders forced W^illiam to act, though he was without a show of legal authority over Scotland. On the advice of the Scotch Lords present in London, he ventured to summon a Convention similar to that which had been summoned in England, and on his own responsibility to set aside the laws which excluded Presbyterians from the Scotch Parliament. This Convention resolved that James had forfeited the crown by mis- government, and offered it to William and Mar)-. The offer was accompanied by a Claim of Right framed on the model of the Declaration of Rights to which they had consented in England, but closing with a demand for the abolition of Prelac}-. Both crown and claim were accepted, and the arrival of the Scotch regiments which \\"illiam had brought from Holland gave strength to the new Government. Its strength was to be roughl}- tested. John Graham of Claverhouse, whose cruelties in the persecution of the Western Covenanters had been rewarded b\' a high command in the Scotch army, and the title of Viscount Dundee, withdrew with a few troopers from Edinburgh to the Highlands, and appealed to the clans. In the Highlands nothing was known of English government or misgovernment : all that the Revolution meant to a Highlander was the restoration of the House of IX THE REVOLUTION 1495 Argyll. To many of the clans it meant the restoration of lands Sec. viii which had been s^ranted them on the Earl's attainder ; and the 1"^ grand •=> ' Alliance JOHN GKAHAMK OK Cl.AVtRHOUSK, VISCOUNT DUNUKIC. From a picture in the possession of Lady E. Leslie-Melvillc-Cartiuright. Macdonalds, the Macleans, and the Camcrons, were as read}' to join Dundee in fii^htiii^^ the Campbells and tlie Government wliich 1496 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE Secviii upheld them as they had been read>- to join Montrose in the same Alliance" ^'^^-^^ ^^^^'^Y >'cars bcforc. They were soon in arms. As William's 1689 Scotch regiments under General ]\Lickay climbed the i)ass of TO 1697 Killiecrankie, Dundee charged them at the head of three thousand A7///V- clansman and swept them in headlong rout down the glen. But //X"i689 ^^'"^ <-icath in the moment of victory broke the onl>' bond which held the Highlanders together, and in a few weeks the host which had spread terror through the Lowlands melted helplessly away. In the next summer Mackay was able to build the strong post of Fort KlLLlECKANKnC. William in the ver)- heart of the disaffected country, and his offers of money and pardon brought about the submission of the clans. Sir John Dalrymplc, the Master of Stair, in whose hands the government of Scotland at this time mainly rested, had hoped that a refusal of the oath of allegiance would give grounds for a war of extermination, and free Scotland for ever from its terror of the Highlanders. He had provided for the expected refusal by orders of a ruthless severity. " Your troops," he wrote to the officer in com.mand, "will destroy entirely the countr}-of Lochaber, Lochiel's IX THE REVOLUTION T497 lands, Keppoch's, Glengarry's and Glencoe's. Your powers shall Sec. viii be large enough. I hope the soldiers will not trouble the The Grand /- ■ 1 • M T-v 1 • 1 Alliance Government with prisoners. But his hopes were disappointed by 1689 the readiness with which the clans accepted the offers of the 1697 Government. All submitted in good time save Macdonald of Massacre Glcncoe, whose pride delayed his taking of the oath till six days c/tu-oe after the latest date fixed by the proclamation. lH)ilcd in his larger hopes of destruction, Daliymplc seized eagerly on the pretext given by Macdonald, and an order " for the extirpation of 1498 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE Sec. VIII that sect of robbers" was laid before William and receiv-ed the tme gkand royal sig-naturc. " The work," wrote the Master of Stair to Colonel 16S9 Hamilton who undertook it, " must be secret and sudden." The TO 1697 troops were chosen from among the Campbells, the deadly foes of the clansmen of Glencoe, and quartered peacefully among the Macdonalds for twelve days, till all suspicion of their errand Feb. 13, disappeared. At da\-brcak the}' fell on their hosts, and in a few 1692 moments thirty of the clansfolk lay dead on the snow. The rest, sheltered b}' a storm, escaped to the mountains to perish for the most part of cold and hunger. " The only thing I regret," said the Master of Stair when the news reached him, " is that any got away." Whatever horror the Massacre of Glencoe has roused in later days, few save Dalrymple knew of it at the time. The peace of the Highlands enabled the work of reorganization to go on quietly at Edinburgh. In accepting the Claim of Right with its repudiation of Prelacy, William had in effect restored the Presby- terian Church, and its restoration was accompanied by the revival of the Westminster Confession as a standard of faith, and by the passing of an Act which abolished lay patronage. Against the Toleration Act which the King proposed, the Scotch Parliament stood firm. But the King was as firm in his purpose as the Parliament. So long as he reigned, William declared in memor- able words, there should be no persecution for conscience' sake. " We never could be of that mind that violence was suited to the advancing of true religion, nor do we intend that our authority shall ever be a tool to the irregular passions of any party." The It was not in Scotland, however, but in Ireland that James and Revolt I-cwis hoped to arrest William's progress. In the middle of his reign, when his chief aim was to provide against the renewed depression of his fellow religionists at his death by any Protestant successor, James had resolved (if we may trust the statement of the French ambassador) to place Ireland in such a position of independence that she 'might serve as a refuge for his Catholic subjects. Lord Clarendon was dismissed from the Lord Lieutenancy and succeeded in the charge of the island by the Catholic Larl of T}Tconnell. The new governor, who was raised to a dukedom, went roughly to work. Every Englishman was turned out of office. Every Judge, ever)- Privy Councillor, every THE REVOLUTION 1499 TO 1697 Mayor and Alderman of a borough was required to be a Catholic Sec. viii and an Irishman. The Irish army, raised to the number of fifty The Grand •' ■' Alliance thousand men and purged of its Protestant soldiers, was entrusted 1689 to Catholic officers. In a few months the English ascendency was overthrown, and the life and fortune of the English settlers were at the rncrc}' of the natives on whom they had trampled since Cromwell's day. The King's flight and the agitation among the native Irish at the news spread panic therefore through the island. JAMES ir. LANDING AT KINSAI.E. Eii^tlants S^hoH'Mloneel verbecldende het vlitgle van Jacobus II.," Amstcrdain, 1690. Another massacre was believed to be at hand ; and fifteen hundred Protestant families, chiefly from the south, fled in terror over sea. The Protestants of the north on the other hand drew together at P2nniskillen and Londonderry, and prepared for self-defence. The outbreak however was still dela)'cd, and for two months Tyrconncll intrigued with William's Government. But his aim was simply to gain time. He was in fact inviting James to return to Ireland, and at the news of his coming with officers, ammunition, and a supply of money pro\ided b}- the I'rcnch King, T)-rconncll threw off the 16S9 1500 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAT. 1689 TO 1697 Sec. viii mask. A flag was hoisted over Dublin Castle, with the words The Grand embroidered on its folds " Now or Never." The signal called Alliance every Catholic to arms. The maddened natives flung themselves on the plunder which their masters had left, and in a few weeks havoc was done, the French envoy told Lewis, which it would take years to repair. Meanwhile James sailed from France to Kinsale. His aim was to carry out an invasion of England with the fifty thousand men that Tyrconncll was said to have at his disposal. But his hopes were ruined by the war of races which had broken THE WALLS OF LONDONDERRY. Built 1609. After IV. H. BartUtt. out. To Tyrconncll and the Irish leaders the King's plans were utterly distasteful. Their policy was that of Ireland for the Irish, and the first step was to drive out the Englishmen who still stood SiciTc of at bay in Ulster. Half of Tyrconnell's army therefore had been ' dcrry sent against Londonderr}', where the bulk of the fugitives found shelter behind a weak wall, manned by a { ± o ^ .^ ^ '5 ? o js ►J — ^ O c --. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1511 Shrewsbury Secretary of State, and gave the Privy Seal to Lord Sec. viii Halifax, a trimmer between the one party and the other. But tke grand ' '■ •' Alliance save in a moment of common oppression or common danger union 1689 TO was impossible. The Whigs clamoured for the punishment of 1697 Tories who had joined in the illegal acts of Charles and of James, and refused to pass the Bill of General Indemnity which William laid before them. William on the other hand was resolved that no bloodshed or proscription should follow the revolution which had placed him on the throne. His temper was averse from persecu- tion ; he had no great love for either of the battling parties ; and above all he saw that internal strife would be fatal to the effective prosecution of the war. While the cares of his new throne were chaining him to England, the confederacy of which he was the guiding spirit was proving too slow and too loosely compacted to cope with the swift and resolute movements of France. The armies of Lewis had fallen back within their own borders, but only to turn fiercely at bay. Even the junction of the English and Dutch fleets failed to assure them the master}- of the seas. The English navy was paralyzed by the corruption which prevailed in the public service, as well as by the sloth and incapacity of its commander. The services of Admiral Herbert at the Rev^olution had been rewarded by the Earldom of Torrington and the command of the fleet ; but his indolence suffered the seas to be swept by French privateers, and his want of seamanship was shown in an indecisive engagement with a French squadron in Bantr}' Ba}'. ^Meanwhile Lewis was straining ever\- ner\-c to win the command of the Channel ; the French dock}'ards were turning out ship after ship, and the gallej's of the Mediterranean fleet were brought round to reinforce the fleet at Brest. A French victor}- off the English coast would have brought serious political danger, for the reaction of popular feeling which liatl begun in favour of James had been increased by the pressure of the war, by the taxa- tion, b}' the expulsion of the Nonjurors and the discontent of the cicrg}', b}- the panic of the Tories at the spirit of vengeance whicli broke out among the lriumi)hant W'liigs, and above all b}- the presence cjf James in Ireland. A new party, that of the Jacobites 'l'"' •' ^ . /iicohif.-s or adherents of King James, was just forming ; and it was feared that a Jacobite rising would follow the appearance of a I^Vench fleet ^512 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VI 11 on thc coast. In .such a state of affairs William judged rightly The Grand that to vicld to thc Whig thirst for vengeance would have been Alliance ' fc> t> 1689 to ruin his cause. He dissolved thc Parliament, which had refused TO 1697 to pass a Bill of Indemnity for all political offences, and called a 1690 new one to meet in March. The result of the election proved that he had only expressed the general temper of the nation. The boroughs had been alienated from thc Whigs by their refusal to pass the Indcmnit}-, and their attempts to secure the Corporations for their own part}" ; while in the counties parson after parson led his flock to thc poll against the Whigs. In the new Parliament thc bulk of the members proved Tories. William accepted the resignation of thc more violent Whigs among his councillors, and MED.\I, CO.M.MEMUR.ATING RESTOR-VflOX OF TOW.N CHARTERS, l6gO. Battle of the Boyne placed Danby at thc head of affairs. In May thc Houses gave their assent to the Act of Grace. Thc King's aim in this sudden change of front was not only to meet the change in the national spirit, but to secure a momentary lull in P^nglLsh faction which would suffer him to strike at thc rebellion in Ireland. While James was King in Dublin it was hopeless to crush treason at home ; and so urgent was the danger, so precious every moment in the present juncture of affairs, that William could trust no one to bring the work as sharply to an end as was needful save himself In the autumn of thc year 16S9 the Duke of Schomberg, an exiled Huguenot who had followed William to England, had been sent with a small force to Ulster, but his landing had onlv roused IX THE REVOLUTION Ireland to a fresh enthusiasm. The ranks of the Irish army were Sec. viii filled up at once, and James was able to face the Duke at Dros:heda '^'he Grand ^ -^ ^ Alliance with a force double that of his opponent. Schomberg, whose men 1689 were all raw recruits whom it was hardly possible to trust at such 1697 L;.MLU1CK 1 kU-M lilL iEA. Dra-Li'ing, c. 1685, in British Museum. odds in the field, entrenched himself at Dundalk, in a camp where pestilence soon swept off half his men, till winter parted the two armies. During the next six months James, whose treasury was utterly exhausted, strove to fill it by a coinage of brass mone)-, while his soldiers subsisted by sheer plunder. William meanwhile was toilinsr hard on the other side of the Channel to brincf the Irish CARRICKFEKGUS. Draiuing, c. 1680, British Museum. war to an end. Schomberg was strengthened during the winter with men and stores, and when the spring came his force reached thirty thousand men. Lewis too felt the importance of the coming struggle; and seven thousand picked I'"r(;nclimcn, iiiulcr the C'oimt I5I4 lllsroKV OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. VUI The Grand ALLIANXli 1689 TO 1697 1690 The Irish War of Lauziin, were despatched to reinforce the army of James. They had hardly arrived when WilHam himself landed at Carrickfcrgus, and pu-shcd rapidh'to the south. His columns soon caught sight of the Irish forces, posted strongly behind tlic l^o}'ne. " I am glad to see you, gentle- men," William cried with a burst of delight; "and if you escape mc now the fault will be mine." P>ar]y next morning the whole PLnglish arm}' pkmgcd into the river. The Irish foot broke in a sudden panic, but the horse made so gallant a stand that Schomberg fell in repulsing its charge, and for a time the English centre was held in check. With the arrival of William, how- ever, at the head of the left wing all was over. James, who had through- out been striving to se- cure the withdrawal of his troops rather than frankly to meet Wil- liam's onset, forsook his troops as they fell back in retreat upon Dublin, and took ship at Kin- sale for France. But though the beaten army was forced by William's pursuit to abandon the capital, it was still resolute to fight. The incapacity ARMOUR WORN BY JA.MES il. AT THE iiOYM;. Tower of Loudon. THE REVOLUTION TO 1697 of the Stuart sovereign moved the scorn even of his followers. Sec. viii " Chanee kingrs with us," an Irish officer replied to an Englishman The Grand * ^ i c3 Alliance who taunted him with the panic of the Boyne, " change kings with 1689 us and we will fight }-ou again." They did better in fighting with- out a king. The French, indeed, withdrew scornfully from the routed arm\' as it stood at bay beneath the walls of Limerick. " Do you call these ramparts ? " sneered Lauzun : " the English will need no cannon ; they may batter them down with roasted apples." But twenty thousand men remained with Sarsfield, a brave and skilful officer who had seen service in England and abroad ; and KING JOHNS cAMl.i;. I.I MEK ICK. A/Ur 11: //. llartlett. his daring surprise of the English ammunition train, his repulse of a desperate attempt to storm the town, and the approach of the winter, forced William to raise the siege. The course of the war abroad recalled him to England, and he left his work to one who was quietly proving himself a master in the art of war. Churchill, now Earl of Marlborough, had been recalled from I'landcrs to command a division which landed in the south of Ireland. (^nl\' a few days remained before the operations were intcrruptcil 1)\- the coming of winter, but ihc few da)'s were turncti to gootl account. Cork, with five thousand men bdiiiid its walls, was taken 1516 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. SEajviii in forty-ci*;ht hours. Kinsale a few days later shared the fate of 'aiIianck" Cork. Winter indeed left Connaught and the greater part of 1689 Minister in Irish hands ; the French force remained untouched, and TO 1697 the coming of a new P^rench general, St. Ruth, \\ith arms and Ireland sup]ilies encouragcd the insurgents. But the summer of 1691 had conquered , ,, , , ^- i i, , ,, ,. , , , , . hardly opened when Cjuik-ell, tlie new J'.nghsh general, by his seizure of Athlone forced on a battle with the combined h^rench and Iri.sh forces at Aughrim, in which St. Ruth fell on the field and his army was utterly broken. The defeat left Limerick alone in its revolt, Oct. 169 1 and even Sarsfield bowed to the necessit)- of a surrender. Two treaties were drawn up between the Irish and English generals. By the first it was stipulated that the Catholics of Ireland .should enjoy such privileges in the exercise of their religion as were con- sistent with law, or as they had enjoyed in the reign of Charles the Second. The Crown pledged itself also to summon a Parliament as soon as possible, and to endeavour to procure to the good Roman Catholics security " from any disturbance upon the account of the said religion." By the military treaty tho.se of Sarsfield's soldiers who would were suffered to follow him to France ; and ten thousand men, the whole of his force, chose exile rather than life in a land where all hope of national freedom was lost. When the wild cry of the women who stood watching their departure was hushed, the silence of death settled down upon Ireland. For a hundred years the country remained at peace, but the peace was a peace of despair. The most terrible legal tyranny under which a nation has ever groaned a\enged the rising under T}-rconnell. The conquered people, in Swift's bitter words of contempt, became '• hewers of wood and drawers of water " to their conquerors. Though local risings of these serfs perpetually spread terror among the ICnglish settlers, all dream of a national revolt passed away ; and till the eve of the French Revolution Ireland ceased to be a source of political danger to England. The Short as the struggle of Ireland had been, it had served Lewis Jacobite Plots \vell, for while William was bu.s)- at the Boyne a .scries of brilliant successes was restoring the fortunes of France. In Flanders the Duke of Luxembourg won the victory of PTeurus. In Italy Marshal Catinat defeated the Duke of Savoy. A success of even greater moment, the last victor\- which France was fated to win at IX THE REVOLUTION 1517 sea, placed for an instant the very throne of WilHam in peril. Sec. viii William never showed a cooler courage than in quittino; Enjjland i'hk Gkand to fight James in Ireland at a moment when the Jacobites were 1689 only looking for the appearance of a French fleet on the coast to 1697 rise in revolt. He was hardly on his way in fact when Toiirville, [une 30, the French admiral, put to sea with strict orders to fight. He was '^^° met by the English and Dutch fleet at Beachy Head, and the Dutch division at once engaged. Though utterly outnumbered, it fought stubbornly in hope of Herbert's aid ; but Herbert, whether from MEDAL OF LOUIS XIV. CO.M.MEMOKATl.NG VICTORY AT UKACIIY IIKAD. (Reverse.) cowardice or treason, looked idly on while his allies were crushed and withdrew at nightfall to seek shelter in the Thames. The danger was as great as the shame, for Tourville's victory left him master of the Channel, and his presence off the coast of l)c\on invited the Jac(jbites to revolt. But whatever the discontent o{ Fnu,li Tories and Nonjurors against William might be, all signs of it ''''^<'''"^ ">' vanished with the landing of the J"'rench. The burm'ng of Teignmouth by Tourville's sailors called the whole coast to arms ; and the news of tlu: Hoyne put an end to all clrcuns of a risini; in 1 CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1519 favour of James. The natural reaction against a cause which Sec. viii looked for foreigrn aid grave a new strength for the moment to the Grand William in England ; but ill luck still hung around the Grand 1689 Alliance. So urgent was the need for his presence abroad that 1697 William left, as we have seen, his work in Ireland undone, and crossed in the spring of 1691 to Flanders. It was the first time since the days of Henry the Eighth that an English king had appeared on the Continent at the head of an English army. But the slowness of the allies again baffled William's hopes. He was forced to look on with a small army while a hundred thousand Frenchmen closed suddenly around Mons, the strongest fortress of the Netherlands, and made themselves masters of it in the presence of Lewis. The humiliation was great, and for the moment all trust in William's fortune faded away. In England the blow was felt more heavily than elsewhere. The Jacobite hopes which had been crushed by the indignation at Tourville's descent woke up to a fresh life. Leading Tories, such as Lord fntrigucs Clarendon and Lord Dartmouth, opened communications with Enirland James ; and some of the leading Whigs, with the Earl of Shrewsbury at their head, angered at what they regarded as William's ingratitude, followed them in their course. In Lord Marlborough's mind the state of affairs raised hopes of a double treason. His design was to bring about a revolt which would drive William from the throne without replacing James, and give the crown to his daughter Anne, whose affection for IMarlborough's wife would place the real government of England in his hands. A yet greater danger lay in the treason of Admiral Russell, who had succeeded Torrington in command of the fleet. Russell's defection would have rcmov^cd the one obstacle to a new attempt which James was resolved to make for the recovery of his throne, and which Lewis had been brought to support. In the beginning of 1692 an army of thirty thousand troops was quartered in Normandy in readiness for a descent on the Lmglish coast. Transports were provided for their passage, antl Tourville was ordered to cover it with the French fleet at Brest. Though Russell had twice as many ships as his opponent, the belief in his purpcsc of betraying William's cause was so strong that Lewis ordered Tourville to engage tiie allied Heels at any disadvantage. SK u " M O o ■s bCu "^3 p X j= T3 c .2-0 j= .Q .5^ »-< '/I c -^ '^^ S '=-'- ,o 0) S Ji ° ^ .;:i j: c-c y c .-C JJ-U d 3 i .c-5 ^ S 2 c c u-l « E^ "w boo JJ ^ '/: u ;;^ ■S «i g o h«e 13 c p ^ z ° " S ^ E •^ u ' ^i r' «J "-3^ -. o o ■^ >; . b/l ■" -5 M c a l> , ." "^ t^ o o nts of ed owin le, seco th the 3 rt o= ■- — -C . > -o j: = J1P s H§^'5 ^ ^ *s o b J;cy i — ~- o £-5 S ?; X'^'n o « U ^ « :s •^ p 5 ^. S .•£ - -f c « S •a * :s y. S .« !e X . ^ i I K t/; ^ be o ii " = £ c -c ■= 2 := g 3 5 o W^ c ~, ,^ c rt ,"- ^^H<^-E i^ "U c ^.M.j J J^'-ChJ J J J j s-iS g.S < — :-Cx :;:;s;x P< CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1521 But whatever Russell's intrigues may have meant, he was no sec. viii Herbert. " Do not think I will let the French triumph over us in ihe Grand '■ Alliance our own seas," he warned his Jacobite correspondents. " If I meet 1689 them, I will fight them, even though King James were on board. 1697 When the allied fleets met the French off the heights of Barfleur his Battle of fierce attack proved Russell true to his word. Tourville's fifty ^" °^"^ vessels were no match for the ninety ships of the allies, and after five hours of a brave struggle the French were forced to fly along the rocky coast of the Cotentin. Twenty-two of their vessels N^iVi (IJJ ;jr>> !y,ri': dat r/ i< ^ MEDAL COMMEMORATING VICTORY AT LA HOGUK. (Reverse.) William's reply to Louis's medal for victory at Beachy He.ad. reached St. Malo ; tliirtccn anchf^rcd with Tour\illc in the bays of Cherbourg and La Ilogue ; but their pursuers were soon upon them, and in a bold attack the English boats burnt ship after ship under the eyes of the I'^rcnch arm)-. All dread of the iinasion was at once at an end ; and the throne of William was secured ])\- the detection and suppression of the Jacobite conspirac}- at home which the invasion was intended to supi)ort. Ikit the o^Mthrow of The t ion the Jacf;l)ite hopes was the least result of the \-ictor\- oi' La Ilogue. l*" ranee ceased from that moment to exist as a great !i,i\al power ; of I In 1522 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap, Sec. VIII for though her fleet was soon recruited to its former strength, the The Grand confidence of hcr sailors was lost, and not even Tourville ventured Alliance 1689 again to tempt in battle the fortune of the seas. A new hope, too, TO 1697 dawned on the Grand Alliance. The spell of French triumph was broken. Namur indeed surrendered to Lewis, and the Duke of Luxembourg maintained the glorx- of the French army b\- a \ictory 1692 over William at Steinkirk. ]3ut the battle was a useless butchery in which the conquerors lost as many men as the conquered. France felt herself disheartened and exhausted by the vastness of her efforts. The public misery was extreme. " The country, ' Fenelon wrote frankly to Lewis, "is a vast hospital." In 1693 the campaign of Lewis in the Netherlands proved a fruitless one, and Luxembourg was hardly able to beat off the fierce attack of William at Xcerwindcn. Vov the first time in his long career of prosperity Lewis bent his pride to seek peace at the sacrifice of his conquests, and though the effort was vain it told that the daring hopes of French ambition were at an end, and that the work of the Grand Alliance was practically done. The First In outer seeming, the Revolution of 1688 had only transferred Mhfisu-y ^^^^ sovereignty over England from James to William and Mary. In actual fact it had given a powerful and decisive impulse to the great constitutional progress which was transferring the sovereignty from the King to the House of Commons. From the moment when its sole right to tax the nation was established by the Bill of Rights, and when its own resolve settled the practice of granting none but annual supplies to the Crown, the House of Commons became the supreme power in the State. It was impossible permanent!}- to suspend its sittings, or in the long run to oppose its will, when either course must end in leaving the Government penniless, in breaking up the army and navy, and in suspending the public service. But though the constitutional change was complete, the machinery of government was far from having adapted itself to the new conditions of political life which The sovc- such a change brought about. However powerful the will of the '^I'f'tlie Hou.se of Commons might be, it had no means of bringing its will Commons directly to bear upon the conduct of public affairs. The Ministers who had charge of them were not its servants, but the servants of the Crown ; it. was from the King that they looked for direction, IX THE REVOLUTION 1523 and to the King that they held themselves responsible. By Sec. viii impeachment or more indirect means the Commons could force the Grand '■ Alliance a King to remove a Minister who contradicted their will ; but they 1689 TO had no constitutional power to replace the fallen statesman by a 1697 Minister who would carry out their wall. The result was the growth of a temper in the Lower House which drove William and his Ministers to despair. It became as corrupt, as jealous of power, as fickle in its resolves and factious in spirit, as bodies always become whose consciousness of the possession of power is untempered by a corresponding consciousness of the practical difficulties or the moral responsibilities of the power which they possess. It grumbled at the ill-success of the war, at the suffering of the merchants, at the discontent of the Churchmen : and it blamed the Crown and its Ministers for all at which it grumbled. But it was hard to find out what policy or measures it would hav^e preferred. Its mood changed, as William bitterly complained, with every hour. It was, in fact, without the guidance of recognised leaders, without adequate information, and destitute of that organization out of which alone a definite policy can come. Nothing better proves the inborn political capacity of the English mind than that it should at once have found a simple and effective solution of such a difficulty as this. The credit of the solution belongs to a man whose political character was of the lowest type. Robert, Earl of Sunderland, had been a Minister in the later days Lord Sun- of Charles the Second ; and he had remained Minister through ^''''''^"'"^ almost all the reign of James. He had held office at last only by compliance with the worst tyranny of his master, and by a feigned conversion to the Roman Catholic faith ; but the ruin of James was no sooner certain than he had secured pardon and protection from William by the betrayal of the master to whom he had sacrificed his conscience and his honour. Since the Revolu- tion Sunderland had striven only to escape public observation in a country retirement, but at this crisis he came secretly forward to bring his unequalled .sagacity to the aid of the King. I lis counsel The new was to recognize practically the new power of the Commons by /'<'/-'/'/7 choosing the Ministers of the Crown exclusively from among the •'•:i'i'/''« members of the part)- which was strongest in the Lower House. As yet no Ministry in the modern sense of the Icrni Jiad existed. Vol.. IV — Tart -5:5 c I- 15^4 HISTORY OF lllK KNc;LISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. viii Each great officer of state, Treasurer or Secretary or Lord Privy The Grand Seal, had ill thcory been independent of his fellow-otficers ; each AlLIANCK ' ^ -lirlll C \ • 1689 was the " Kin<4's servant" and responsible lor the discharge ol liis TO 1697 Ki.ibl.KT Sl'K.NCEK, SKCOND i;Al;L 1 >K SU N DKRLAM). Future by Carlo Maraita, at Althorpe. special duties to the King alone. From time to time one Minister, like Clarendon, might tower above the rest and give a "■eneral direction to the whole course of government, but the IX THE REVOLUTION 1525 predominance was merely personal and never permanent ; and sec. viii even in such a case there were colleagues who were readv to The grand ' Alliance oppose or even impeach the statesman who overshadowed them. 1689 It was common for a King to choose or dismiss a single Minister 1697 without any communication with the rest ; and so far was even William from aiming at ministerial unity, that he had striven to reproduce in the Cabinet itself the balance of parties which prevailed outside it. Sunderland's plan aimed at replacing these independent Ministers by a homogeneous Ministry, chosen from the same part}', representing the same sentiments, and bound together for common action by a sense of responsibility and loyalty to the party to which it belonged. Not only would such a plan secure a unity of administration which had been unknown till then, but it gave an organization to the House of Commons which it had never had before. The ^Ministers who were represen- tatives of the majority of its members became the natural leaders of the House. Small factions were drawn together into the two great parties which supported or opposed the Ministry of the Crown. Above all it brought about in the simplest possible way the solution of the problem which had so long vexed both King and Commons. The new Ministers ceased in all but name to be the King's servants. They became simply an executive Committee representing the will of the majority of the House of Commons, and capable of being easily set aside by it and replaced by a similar Committee whenever the balance of power shifted from one side of the House to the other. Such was the origin of that system of representative govern- The ment which has gone on from Sunderland's day to our own. But J"" ° though William showed his own political genius in understanding and adopting Sunderland's plan, it was only slowly and tcntativch' that he ventured to carry it out in practice. In spite of the temporary reaction Sunderland believed that the balance of political power was really on the side of the Whigs. Not only were they the natural rc[)rcsentatives of the principles of the Revolution, and the supporters of the war, but they stood far above their opponents in parliamentary and administrative talent. At their head stood a group of statesmen, whose close union in thought and action gained them the name of the Junto. Russell. s I- 2 1526 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. VIII as vct the most prominent of these, was the victor of La Hogue ; The Grand [ohn Somcrs was an advocate who had sprunc^ into fame by his Alliance "^ . 1689 defence of the Sc\cn Bishops ; Lord Wharton was known as 1697 the most dexterous and unscrupulous of party managers ; and IMontague was fast making a reputation as the ablest of English financiers. In spite of such considerations, however, it is doubtful whether William would ha\-c thrown himself into the hands of a pureK' Whig Ministr\- but for the attitude which the Tories took 1694 towards the war. Exhausted as France was the war still languished, and the allies failed to win a single victory. Mean- while English trade was all but ruined b\- the French privateers, and the nation stood aghast at the growth of taxation. The Tories, always cold in their support of the Grand Alliance, now became eager for peace. The W'higs, on the other hand, remained resolute in their support of the war. William, in whose mind the contest with France was the first object, was thus driven slowly to The follow Sunderland's advice. Montague had already met the strain Debt of the war by bringing forward a plan which had been previously 1694 suggested by a Scotchman, \\'illiam Paterson, for the creation of a National Bank. While serving as an ordinary bank for the supply of capital, the Bank of England, as the new institution was called, was in realit}- an instrument for procuring loans from the people at large b}- the formal pledge of the State to repay the money advanced on the demand of the lender. A loan of iJ^ 1, 200,000 was thrown open to public subscription ; and the subscribers to it were formed into a chartered company in whose hands the negotiations of all after loans was placed. In ten da\-s the list of subscribers was full. The discovery of the resources afforded by the national wealth revealed a fresh source of power ; and the rapid growth of the National Debt, as the mass of these loans to the State came to be called, gave a new security against the return of the Stuarts, whose first work would have been the repudiation of the claims of the lenders or " fundholders." The evidence of the public credit gave strength to William abroad, while at home a new unit\- of action followed the change which Sunderland counselled and which was quieth' carried out. One by one the Tory IMinisters, already weakened by Montague's success, were replaced by members of the Junto. Russell went to IX THE REVOLUTION 1527 the Admiralty ; Somers was named Lord Keeper ; Shrewsbury, sec. viu Secretary of State ; Montague, Chancellor of the Exchequer. Even before this change was completed its effect was felt. The House of Commons took a new tone. The Whig majority of its members, united and disciplined, moved quietly under the direc- tion of their natural leaders, the Whig Ministers of the Crown. It was this which enabled William to face the shock which was given to his position by the death of Queen Mary. The renewed attacks of the Tories showed what fresh hopes had been raised by William's lonely position. The Parliament, however, whom the King had just conciliated by assenting at last to the Triennial Bill, The Grand Allianxe TO 1697 Death of Marv 1694 vAr "■i^ ': i mm iv,-^'' Ait I A.'ifi 'j-;i "'ntA fov"? f^^' MED.-\L COMMEMORATING THE STOR.MIXG OF TOUBOCAN (DARIEN), 1 7OO. went steadily with the Ministry; and its fidelity was rewarded by triumph abroad. In 1695 the Alliance succeeded for the first time in winning a great triumpli over France in the capture of Namur. The King skilfully took advantage of his victory to call a new Parliament, and its members at once showed their temper by a vigorous support of the war. The Houses, indeed, were no mere tools in William's hands. They forced him to resume prodigal grants of lands made to his Dutch favourites, and to remove his ministers in Scotland who had aided in a wikl i)rojcct for a .Scotch colony on the Isthmus of Daricn. They claiinctl a right to name members of the n(-\v Hoard of Trade, establislu'd for ir. and Russell was followed by the dismissal of the Whig ministry, and Somers and his friends were replaced b\- an administration composed of moderate Tories, with Lords Rochester and Godolphin as its leading members. The fourlccn thousand men ^534 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Second Partition Trciity I 700 who still remained in the army were cut down to seven. William's earnest entreaty could not turn the Parliament from its resolve to send his Dutch guards out of the country. The navy, which had numbered forty thousand sailors during the war, was cut down to eight. How much William's hands were weakened by this peace-temper of England was shown by the Second Partition Treaty which was concluded between the two maritime powers and P^-ancc. The demand of Lewis that the Netherlands should DUTCH GUARDS. Temp. William HI. Flout an engraving by Roiueyn de Hooge. be given to the Elector of Bavaria, whose political position left him a puppet in the P'rcnch King's hands, was resisted. Spain, the Netherlands, and the Indies were assigned to the second son of the Emperor, the Archduke Charles of Austria. But the whole of the Spanish territories in Italy were now granted to France ; and it was provided that Milan should be exchanged for Lorraine, whose Duke was to be summarily transferred to the new Duchy. If the Emperor persisted in his refusal to come into the Treaty, the THE REVOLUTION 1535 MEDAL COMMEMOKATIXG HOMAGE OF DUKE OF l.ORRAI.NE TO I.OUIS XIV. share of his son was to pass to another unnamed prince, who was probably the Duke of Savoy. The Emperor still protested, but his protest was of little moment so long as Lewis and the two maritime powers held firmly together. Nor was the bitter resentment of Spain of more avail. The Spaniards cared little whether a French or an Austrian prince sat on the throne of Charles the Second, but their pride revolted against the dismemberment of the monarchy by the loss of its Italian dependencies. Even the d}-ing King shared the anger of his subjects, and a will wrested from him by the factions which wrangled over his death-bed be- queathed the whole monarchy of Spain to a grandson of Lewis, the Duke of Anjou, the second son of the Dauphin. The Treaty of Partition was so recent, and the risk of accepting this bequest so great, that Lewis would hardl)- have resolved on it but for his belief that the temper of Eng- land must necessarily render Wil- liam's opposition a fruitless one. Never in fact had England been so averse from war. So strong was the antipathy to William's foreign policy that men openly approved the French King's course. Hardly any one in Eng- land dreaded the succession of a bo)- who, French as he was, would as they believed soon be turned into a Spaniard by the natural course of events. The succession of the Duke of Anjou was general 1\- looked upon as far better than the increa.sc of power which I'rance woukl ha\c derived from the cessions of the last MEDAL COMMEMORATING NOMINA- TIO.N OK DUKE OF ANJOU AS KI.NG OK SI'AIN. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 The Second Grand Alliance HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Duke of Anjoii ill Spain 1701 Treaty of Partition, cessions which would ha\c turned the Mediterranean, it was said, into a French lake, imperilled the EngHsh trade with the Levant and America, and raised France into a formidable power at sea. " It grieves me to the heart," William wrote bitterly, " that almost every one rejoices that France has preferred the Will to the Treaty." Astonished and angered as he was at his rival's breach of faith, he had no means of punishing it. The Duke of Anjou entered Madrid, and Lewis proudly boasted that hence- forth there were no Pyrenees. The life- work of William seem- ed undone. He knew himself to be dying. His cough was inces- sant, his eyes sunk and dead, his frame so weak that he could hardly get into his coach. But never had he shown himself so great. His courage, rose with every diffi- culty. His temper, which had been heated by the personal af- fronts lavished on him through English fac- tion, was hushed by a supreme effort of his will. His large and clear-sighted intellect looked through the temporary embarrass- ments of French diplomacy and English party strife to the great interests which he knew must in the end determine the course of European politics. Abroad and at home all seemed to go against him. For the moment he had no ally save Holland, for Spain was now united with Lewis, while the attitude of Bavaria ^{JlKuropjBJVftec/ in mis Bch cf . tll^teafjpafnf &onmi:Cfewe3 w lAr p^lf And bf at la/f a^/cmtina/ krrt^ mt/Juf SATIRIC.VL PLAYING-CARD. Temp. War of the Spanish Succession. British Museum. IX THE REVOLUTION ^537 divided Germany and held the House of Austria in check. The Bavarian Elector indeed, who had charge of the Spanish Nether- lands and on whom William had counted, openly joined the French side from the first and proclaimed the Duke of Anjou as King in Brussels. In England the new Parliament was crowded with Tories who were resolute against war. The Tory Ministry pressed him to acknowledge the new King of Spain ; and as even Holland did this William was forced to submit. He could only count on the greed of Lewis to help him, and he did not count in vain. The approval of the French King's action had sprung from the belief that he intended to leave Spain to the Spaniards under their new King. Bitter too as the strife of Whig and Tory might be in England, there were two things on which Whig and Tory were agreed. Neither would suffer France to oc- cupy the Netherlands. Neither would endure a French attack on the Protestant succession which the Revolution of 1688 had established. But the arrogance of Lewis blinded him to the need of moderation in his hour of good-luck. In the name of his grand.son he introduced P'rcnch troops into the seven fortresses known as the Dutch barrier, and into Ostend and the coast towns of Flanders. Kvcn the Peace- Parliament at once acquiesced in W^illiam's demand for their withdrawal, and authorized him to conchide a clcfcnsi\c JOHN DRYDEN, DIED 1700. Picture by Sir G. Kncller. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Eui^laud iiini the 1538 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. IX alliance with Holland. The King'.s policy indeed was bitterl)- Marl- blamed, while the late ministers, Somers, Russell, and Montague BOROUGH _ 1698 (now become peers), were impeached for their share in the treaties. 1712 But outside the House of Commons the tide of national feeling rose as the designs of Lewis grew clearer. He refused to allow the Dutch barrier to be re-established ; and a great French fleet gathered in the Channel to support, it was believed, a fresh Jacobite descent, which was proposed by the ministers of James in a letter intercepted and laid before Parliament. Even the House of Commons took fire at this, and the fleet was raised to thirt}- thousand men, the army to ten thousand. Kent sent up a remon- strance against the factious measures b}- which the Tories still struggled against the King's policy, with a prayer that addresses might be turned into Bills of Supply; and William was encouraged b\- these signs of a change of temper to despatch an English force to Holland, and to conclude a secret treaty with the United Provinces for the recovery of the Netherlands from Lewis, and for their transfer with the Milanese to the house of Austria as a means of counter-balancing the new power added to France. But Death of England was still clinging desperately to a hope of peace, when J (X 711 CS Lewis b\' a sudden act forced it into war. He had acknowledged Sepf. 1701 William as King in the Peace of R}-swick, and pledged himself to oppose all attacks on his throne. He now entered the bed- chamber at St. Germain where James was breathing his last, and promised to acknowledge his son at his death as King of England, Scotland, and Ireland. The promise was in fact a declaration of war, and in a moment all England was at one in accepting the challenge. The issue Lewis had raised was no longer a matter of European politics, but the question whether the work of the Revo- lution should be undone, and whether Catholicism and despotism should be replaced on the throne of England by the arms of France. On such a question as this there was no difference between Tory and \\ hig. When the death, in 1700, of the last child of the , , . Princess Anne had been followed by a new Act of Succession, rot Ad of ^ •' ^ Setii'c- a voice had been raised for James or his son ; and the descendants of the daughter of Charles the First, Henrietta of Orleans, whose onl}- child had married the Catholic Duke of Savo}', were passed over in the same silence. The Parliament fell back on the line of Die lit 1701 IX THE REVOLUTION 1539 James the First. His daughter Elizabeth had married the Elector Palatine, and her onl\- surviving child, Sophia, was the wife of the late and the mother of the present Elector of Hanover. It was in Sophia and her heirs, being Protestants, that the Act of Settlement vested the Crown. It was enacted that every English sovereign must be in communion with the Church of England as by law established. All future kings were forbidden to leave England without consent of Parliament, and foreigners were excluded from all public posts. The independence of justice was established by a clause which provided that no judge should be removed from office save on an address from Parliament to the Crown. The two prin- ciples that the King acts only through his ministers, and that these ministers are responsible to Parliament, were as- serted by a requirement that all public business should be formall\- done in the Privy Council, and all its decisions signed b\' its members — provi- sions which went far to complete the parliamen- tary Constitution which had been drawn up by the \V\]\ of Rights. The national union which had already been shown in this action of the Tory Parliament, now showed itself in the King's welcome on his return from the Hague, where the conclusion of a new Grand Alliance between the Empire, Hol- land, and the United Provinces, had rewarded William's patience and skill. The Alliance was .soon joined by Denmark, Sweden, the Palatinate, and the bulk of the German States. The Parlia- ment of 1702, though still Tory in the main, replied to William's stirring appeal b)- voting forty thousand soldiers and as many sailors for the coming struggle. A Bill of Attaiiuler was passed Vol. IV— I'AKT 33 5 ^' THE ELECTRKSS SOPHIA. Reverse of a medal struck to commemorate the Act of Succession, 1701. Sec. IX 1\Iarl- BOROUGH 1698 TO I7I2 154° HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Marl- borough against the new Pretender ; and all members of cither House and all public officials were sworn to uphold the succession of the House of Hanover. But the King's weakness was already too great to allow of his taking the field ; and he was forced to entrust the war in the Netherlands to the one Englishman who had shown himself capable of a great command. John Churchill, Earl of Marlborough, was born in 1650, the son of a Devonshire Cavalier, whose daughter became at the Restoration mistress of the Duke of York. The shame of Arabella did more per- haps than her father's loyalt}^ to win for her brother a commission in the royal Guards ; and, after five years' service abroad under Turcnne, the young captain became colonel of an English regiment which was retained in the service of France. He had already shown some of the qualities of a great soldier, an un- ruffled courage, a bold and \'enturous temper held in check by a cool and serene judgement, a vigilance and capacity for enduring fatigue which never forsook him. In later years he was known to spend a whole day in reconnoitring, and at Blenheim he remained on horseback for fifteen hours. But courage and skill in arms did less for Churchill on his return to the English court than his personal beauty. In the French camp M. DE 3IARLE BOROUGH, From an engraving after I'an tier Mculcn. IX THE REVOLUTION 1541 he had been known as "the handsome EngHshman;" and his sec. ix manners were as winning as his person. Even in age his address marl- was ahnost irresistible : " he engrossed the graces," says Chester- 169S field ; and his air never lost the careless sweetness which won the 171 2 favour of Lady Castlemaine. A present of ^^"5,000 from the King's mistress laid the foundation of a fortune which grew rapidl}' to greatness, as the prudent forethought of the handsome young soldier hardened into the avarice of age. But it was to the Churchill Duke of York that Churchill looked mainly for adv^ancement, and jamcs he earned it by the fidelity with which as a member of his household he clung to the Duke's fortunes during the dark days of the Popish Plot. He followed James to the Hague and to Edinburgh, and on his master's return he was rewarded with a peerage and the colonelcy of the Life Guards. The service he rendered James after his accession by saving the ro}-al army from a surprise at Sedge'moor would have been }'et more splendidly acknowledged but for the King's bigotry. In spite of his master's personal solicitations Churchill remained true to Protestantism ; but he knew James too well to count on further favour. Luckily he had now found a new groundwork for his fortunes in the growing influence of his wife over the King's second daughter, Anne ; and at the crisis of the Revolution the adhesion of Anne to the cause of Protestantism was of the highest value. No sentiment of gratitude to his older patron hindered Marlborough from corresponding with the Prince of Orange, from promising Anne's sympath)^ to William's effort, or from deserting the ranks of the King's army when it faced William in the field. His desertion Churchill proved fatal to the royal cause ; but great as this service was it William was eclipsed by a second. It was by his wife's persuasion that Anne was induced to forsake her father and take refuge in Danby's camp. Unscrupulous as his conduct had been, the services which he rendered to William were too great to miss their reward. He became l^'arl of Marlborough ; he was put at the head of a force during the Irish war where his I'apid successes won William's regard ; and he was given high commantl in the army of Elanders. Put the sense of his power over Anne soon turned Marlborough from ])lotting treason against James to ])lot treason against Wilh'am. fireat as was bis greed of gold, he had 5 c 2 154- H IS TORY OF THE ENCiLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IX married Sarah Jenniiii;s, a penniless beaut\- of Charles's court, in Marl- whoin a violcnt and malisjnant tcm]:)er was strancjcly combined i(OROi't;n ^ o y 1698 with a i^ower of winnin;^ and retaining; love. Churchill's affection 1 71 2 for her ran like a thread of gold through the dark web of his career. In the midst of his marches and from the very battle-field JOHN CIIURCHII.L, DUKK OF .MAKLBOKOUGH. Picture by J. Closteriitan, in National Portrait Gallery. he writes to his wife with the same passionate tenderness. The composure which no danger or hatred could ruffle broke down into ahnost womanish depression at the thought of her coldness or at any burst of her violent humour. He never left lier without a pang. " I did for a great while with a perspective glass look upon IX THE REVOLUTION 1543 the cliffs," he once wrote to her after setting out on a campaign, Six. ix "in hopes that I might have had one sight of you." It was no ^i^ri.- o y BOROUGH wonder that the woman who inspired Marlborough with a lov^e like 169S this bound to her the weak and feeble nature of the Princess 1712 Anne. The two friends threw off the restraints of state, and SARAH, DUCHKSS OF MAKI.I; H: ■ .M , ii . Picture I'y Si'f Cotifrey Knclh-r, in A'ational Portrait Gallery. addressed each other as "Mrs. I-'reeman " and "Mrs. Morlc\-." It was on his wife's innuence o\-cr her friend that the l^arl's ambition counted in its designs against W'illiain. Mis plan was to drive the King from the throne by backing the 'Ic^rics in their opposition to the war as well as by stirring to frcn/y the Knglish 1544 HisruKv ui- THE English people CHAP. Mari.- bouoi(;h 169S I'O I7I2 Sec. IX hatred of forciijncrs, and to scat y\nnc in his place. The discovery of his designs roused the King to a burst of unusual resentment. " Were I and my Lord Marlborough private persons," William exclaimed, " the sword would ha\e to settle between us." As it was, he could onl\- strip the l^^arl of his offices and command, and drive his wife from St. James's. Anne followed her favourite, and the court of the Princess became the centre of the Tory opposition ; while Marlborough opened a correspondence with James. So notorious v/as his treason that on the eve of the MEMORIAL f)F WILLIAM III. Unique gold »tcdj.i in Britiili Musenin. Marl- borough and the Grand Alliance French in\-asion of 1692 he was one of the first of the suspected persons sent to the Tower. The death of Mary forced William to recall Anne, who became b\' this event his successor ; and with Anne the Marlboroughs returned to court. The King could not bend himself to trust the P2arl again ; but as death drew near he saw in him the one man whose splendid talents fitted him, in spite of the baseness and treason of his life, to rule luigland and direct the Grand Alliance in his stead. He employed Marlborough therefore to negotiate the treaty of alliance with the Emperor, and put him at the head of the army in P^landers. But the Earl had only just taken the IX THE REVOLUTION 1545 command when a fall from his horse proved fatal to the broken Sec. ix frame of the Kinsr. " There was a time when I should have been Marl- BOROUGH glad to have been delivered out of my troubles," the dying man 1698 whispered to Portland, " but I own I see another scene, and could 1712 wish to live a little longer." He knew, however, that the wish was Death of vain, and commended Marlborough to Anne as the fittest person ,, ' '"'" '^ ^ Mar. 1702 to lead her armies and guide her counsels. Anne's zeal needed no quickening. Three days after her accession the Earl was named Captain-General of the English forces at home and abroad, and entrusted with the entire direction of the war. His supremacy over home affairs was secured by the construction of a purely Tory administration with Lord Godolphin, a close friend of Marlborough's, as Lord Treasurer at its head. The Queen's affection for his wife ensured him the support of the Crown at a moment when Anne's personal popularity gave the Crown a new weight with the nation. In England, indeed, party feeling for the moment died away. All save the extreme Tories were won over to the war now that it was waged on behalf of a Tory queen by a Tory general, while the most extreme of the Whigs were ready to back even a Tory general in waging a Whig war. Abroad, however, William's death shook the Alliance to its base ; and even Holland wavered in dread of being deserted by England in the coming struggle. But the decision of Marlborough soon did away with this distrust. Anne was made to declare from the throne her resolve to pursue with energy the policy of her predecessor. The Parliament was brought to sanction vigorous measures for the prosecution of the war. The new general hastened to the Hague, received the command of the Dutch as well as of the English forces, and drew the German powers into the Confederacy with a skill and adroitness which even William might ha\e envied. Never was greatness more quickly recognized than in the case of Marlborough. In a few months he was regarded by all as the guiding spirit of the Alliance, and princes whose jealousy had worn out the patience of the King yielded without a struggle to the counsels of his successor. His temper fittctl him in an especial way to be the head of a great confederac}-. Like William, he owed little of his power to any early training. The trace of his neglected education was seen to the la^l in his reluctance to write. 1546 HISTORY OF THE EX(;i,ISH TKOPLE 171: Sec. IX "Of all things," he said to his wife, "■ I do not love writing." To Marl- pen a despatch indeed was a far greater trouble to him than to BOROl'GH 1698 plan a campaign. But nature had given him qualities which in other men spring specialK' from culture. His capacity for business was immense. During the next ten years he assumed the general direction of the war in Inlanders and in Spain. He managed ever\' negotiation with the courts of the allies. He watched over the shifting phases of English politics. He crossed the Channel to win over Anne to a change in the Cabinet, or hurried to Berlin to secure the due contingent of Electoral troops from Brandenburg. At one and the same moment men saw him reconciling the Emperor with the Protestants of Hungary, stirring the Calvinists of the Cevcnnes into revolt, arranging the affairs of Portugal, and providing for the protection of the Duke of Savoy. But his air showed no trace of fatigue or haste or vexation. He retained to the last the indolent grace of his youth. His natural dignity was never ruffled by an outbreak of temper. Amidst the storm of battle his soldiers saw their leader "without fear of danger or in the least hurr\-, giving his orders with all the calmness imaginable." In the cabinet he was as cool as on the battle-field. He met with the same equable serenity the pettiness of the German princes, the phlegm of the Dutch, the ignorant opposition of his officers, the libels of his political opponents. There was a touch of irony in the simple expedients by which he sometimes solved problems which had baffled Cabinets. The touchy pride of the King of Prussia made him one of the most vexatious among the allies, but all difficult)' with him ceased when Marlborough rose at a state banquet and handed him a napkin. Churchill's composure rested partly indeed on a pride which could not stoop to bare the real self within to the eyes of meaner men. In the bitter moments before his fall he bade Godolphin burn some querulous letters which the persecution of his opponents had wrung from him. " My desire is that the world may continue in their error of thinking me a happy man, for I think it better to be envied than pitied." But in great measure it sprang from the purely intellectual temper of his mind. His passion for his wife was the one sentiment which tinged the colourless light in which his understanding moved. In all else he was without love or hate, he THE REVOLUTION 1547 knew neither doubt nor regret. In private life he was a humane and compassionate man ; but if his position required it he could betray Englishmen to death, or lead his arm}- to a butchery such as that of IMalplaquet. Of honour or the finer sentiments of mankind he knew nothing ; and he turned without a shock from guiding Europe and winning great victories to heap up a matchless fortune by peculation and greed. He is perhaps the only instance of a man of real greatness who loved monc)' for monc}''s sake. The pas- sions which stirred the men around him, whether noble or ignoble, were to him simply elements in an intellectual problem which had to be solve'd b}' patience. " Patience will overcome all things," he writes again and again. "As I think most things are governed b\- destin}-, having done all things we should submit A\ith patience." As a statesman the high qualities of Marlborough were owned b\- his bitterest foes. " Over the Confedcr- ac}'," saj's Bolingbrokc, " he, a new, a private man, acquired b\- merit antl management a more decided influence than high birth, confirmed authority, and even the crown of Great Britain, had given to King William." But great as he was in the council, he was even greater in the field. He stands alone amongst the masters of the: art of war as a captain whose victories began at an age when the work of most men is done. Though he served as a \-oung officer under Turenne and f(^r a few months in Ireland and tin- XctlKiiands, in- li.id lu'ld Sec. IX Mari.- boroigii I69S TO I7I2 .^ 'TtUniom^ oryer cuyo&i. Marl- borough and the War SATIRICAL ?LAVING-CAK1> Temp. Marlborough. British Museuiit. 154^ Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. no great command till he took the field in Flanders at the age of fifty-two. He stands alone, too, in his unbroken good fortune. Voltaire notes that he never besieged a fortress which he did not take. rilli ULKE OF MARLBORuUGII s UL,\.\I.\G FOOTMEN. Tapestry at BUnheiiu Paiace, representing i/ie Battle of Blenheim. or fought a battle which he did not win. His difficulties came not so much from the enemy, as from the ignorance and timidity of his own allies. He was never defeated in the field, but victory after victory was snatched from him b\- the incapacit)- of his officers or IK THE REVOLUTION 1549 the stubbornness of the Dutch. What startled the cautious Sec. ix strategists of his dav was the vicrour and audacitv of his plans. Marl- ^ ^ O > J. BOROIGH Old as he was, IMarlborough's designs had from the first all the 1698 dash and boldness of youth. On taking the field in 1702 he at once resolved to force a battle in the heart of Brabant. The plan ope was foiled by the timidity of the Dutch deputies. But his resolute TO I7I2 leniui^ of the var EUGENE AND MARLBOROUGH RECONNOITRING. From an engraving by Cavisvclt. advance across the Meuse drew the French forces from that river, and enabled him to reduce fortress after fortress in a scries of sieges, till the surrender of Liege closed a campaign which cut off the I-"rcnch from the Lower Rhine, and frccil Holland from all danger of an invasion. The successes of Marlborough had been brought into bolder relief by the fortunes of the war in other quarters. Though the Imijcrialist general, I'rinci: Eugene '"""'filllll'lllllllillllllllllll'' PflM |l|iiiFiil|!ii'l''ipl:il'lil!in"|HI'il!|ill!ilill|ii|i|inillll'i!lli!:-'^"'""" X I 3 ^ CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION ,55, of Savoy, showed his powers by a surprise of the fVench t> O BOROUGH country of Wurtemberg, he joined the Imperial army under the 1698 TO Prince of Baden, stormed the heights of Donauwerth, crossed the 1712 Danube and the Lech, and penetrated into the heart of Bavaria. The crisis drew the two armies which were facing one another on the Upper Rhine to the scene. The arrival of Marshal Tallard with thirty thousand French troops saved the Elector of Bavaria for the moment from the need of submission ; but the junction of his opponent, Prince Eugene, with Marlborough raised the con- tending forces again to an equality. After a few marches the armies met on the north bank of the Danube, near the little town of Hochstadt and the village of Blindheim or Blenheim, which have given their names to one of the most memorable battles in the history of the world. In one respect the struggle which followed stands almost unrivalled, for the whole of the Teutonic race was represented in the strange medley of Englishmen, Dutchmen, Hanoverians, Danes, Wiirtembergcrs, and Austrians who followed Marlborough and Eugene. The French and Bavarians, who numbered like their opponents some fifty thousand men, lay behind a little stream which ran through swampy ground to the Danube. Their position was a strong one, for its front was covered by the swamp, its right by the Danube, its left by the hill-country in which the stream rose ; and Tallard had not only entrenched himself, but was far superior to his rival in artillery. But for once Marlborough's hands were free. " I have great reason," he wrote calmly home, "to hope that everything will go well, for I have the pleasure to find all the officers willing to obey without knowing any other reason than that it is my desire, which is very different from what it was in Inlanders, where I was obliged to have the consent of a council of war for cver}-thing I undertook." So formidable were the obstacles, howev^er, that though the allies were in motion at sunrise, it was not till midday that luigene, who commanded on the right, succeeded in crossing tiie stream. The English foot at once forded it on the left and attacked the \illagc -linr. 13, of Blindheim in which the bulk of the French infantr}' were ''""^ entrenched ; but after a furious struggle the attack was rc[)ulse(l, while as gallant a resistance at the (jther end of the line held " MAI.BOKOUK." Illustration, Early Nineteenth Century, to French song (broadside), Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1555 Eugene in check. The centre, however, which the French beheved Sec. ix to be unassailable, had been chosen by Marlborough for the chief Marl- ' BOROUGH point of attack ; and by making an artificial road across the morass 1698 he was at last enabled to throw his eight thousand horsemen on 1712 the French cavalry which occupied this position. Two desperate charges which the Duke headed in person decided the day. The French centre was flung back on the Danube and forced to surrender. Their left fell back in confusion on Hochstadt : while their right, cooped up in Blindheim and cut off from retreat, became prisoners of war. Of the defeated army only twenty thousand escaped. Twelve thousand were slain, fourteen thousand were captured. Germany was finally freed from the French ; and Marlborough, who followed the wreck of the French host in its flight to Elsass, soon made himself master of the Lower Moselle. But the loss of France could not be measured by men or fortresses. A hundred victories since Rocrbi had taught the world to regard the French army as invincible, when Blenheim and the surrender of the flower of the French soldiery broke the spell. From that moment the terror of victory passed to the side of the allies, and " Malbrook " became a name of fear to every child in France. In England itself the victory of Blenheim aided to bring about Ramillies a great change in the political aspect of affairs. The Tories were resolved to create a permanent Tory majority in the Commons by excluding Nonconformists from the municipal corporations, which returned the bulk of the borough members. The Protestant Dissenters, while adhering to their separate congregations, in which they were now protected by the Toleration Act, " qualified for office" by the " occasional conformity" of receiving the sacrament at Church once in the year. It was against this " occasional Occasional conformity " that the Tories introduced a test to exclude the '^^"J°^^"- Nonconformists ; and this test at first received Marlborough's support. But it was steadily rejected by the Lords as often as it was sent up to them, and it was soon guessed that their resistance was secretly backed by both Marlborough and G()doli)hin. Tory as he was, in fact, Marlborough had no mind for an unchecked Tory rule, or for a revival of religious strife which would be fatal to the war. Ikit he strove in vain to propitiate his party by inducing the Oueen to .set aside the tenths and first-fruits hitherto Vol. IV— I'akt 34 5 •! ,556 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH TEOPLE chap. sfx. IX paid by the clergy to the Crown as a fund for the augmentation of Marl- Small bcneficcs, a fund which still bears the name of Queen Anne's BOROIOH '^ 1698 Bounty. The Commons showed their resentment by refusmg to 1 7 12 add a grant of money to the grant of a Dukedom after his first campaign ; and the higher Tories, with Lord Nottingham at their head, began to throw every obstacle they could in the way of the continuance of the war. At last they quitted office in 1704, and Marlborough replaced them by Tories of a more moderate stamp who were still in favour of the war : by Robert Harley, who became Secretary of State, and Henry St. John, a man of splendid talents, who was named Secretary at War. The Duke's march into Germany, which pledged England to a struggle in the heart of the Continent, embittered the political strife. The high Tories and Jacobites threatened, if Marlborough failed, to bring his head to the block, and only the victory of Blenheim saved him from political ruin. Slowly and against his will the Duke drifted from his own party to the party which really backed his policy. He availed himself of the national triumph over Blenheim to dissolve Parliament ; and when the election of 1705, as he hoped, returned a majority in favour of the war, his efforts brought about a The coalition between the moderate Tories who still clung to him and ^mliistrv ^^^ Whig Junto, whose support was purchased by making a Whig, William Cowper, Lord Keeper, and by sending Lord Sunderland as envoy to Vienna. The bitter attacks of the peace party were entirely foiled by this union, and Marlborough at last felt secure at home. But he had to bear disappointment abroad. His plan of attack along the line of the Moselle was defeated by the refusal of the Imperial army to join him. When he entered the French lines across the Dyle, the Dutch generals withdrew their troops ; and his proposal to attack the Duke of Villeroy in the field of Waterloo was rejected in full council of war by the deputies of the States with cries of "murder" and "massacre." Even Marl- borough's composure broke into bitterness at the blow. " Had I had the same power I had last year," he wrote home, " I could have won a greater victory than that of Blenheim." On his complaint the States recalled their commissaries, but the year was lost ; nor had greater results been brought about in Italy or on the Rhine. The spirits of the allies were only sustained by the IX THE REVOLUTION ^30/ romantic exploits of Lord Peterborough in Spain. Profligate, unprincipled, flighty as he was, Peterborough had a genius for war, and his seizure of Barcelona with a handful of men, his recognition of the old liberties of Aragon, roused that province to support the cause of the second son of the Emperor, who had been acknow- Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 CHARLES MORDAUNT, EARL uK PETERBOROUGH. From a mezzotint by J. Simon of a picture by M. Dahl. ledgcd as King of Spain by the allies under the title of Charles the Third. Catalonia and Valencia soon joined Aragon in declaring for Charles: while Marlborough spent the winter of 1705 in negotiations at Vienna, licrlin, Hanover, and tlu' Jlague, and in preparations f(jr the ctjuiing campaign. I'lagcr for frc-ctloin of 5 II 2 ;5S HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 action, and sick of the Imperial generals as of the Dutch, he planned a march over the Alps and a campaign in Italy ; and though his designs were defeated by the opposition of the allies, he found himself unfettered when he again appeared in Flanders in 1706. The French marshal Villeroy w^as as eager as Marlborough for an engagement ; and the two armies met on the 23rd of May at the village of Ramillics on the undulating plain which forms the highest ground in Brabant. The French were drawn up in a wide curve with morasses covering their front. After a feint on their left, Marlborough flung himself on their right wing at Ramillics, crushed it in a brilliant charge that he led in person, and swept along their MEDAL TO COMMEMORATE BATTLE OF RAMILLIES. The Union with Scotland whole line till it broke in a rout which only ended beneath the walls of Louvain. In an hour and a half the French had lost fifteen thousand men, their baggage, and their guns ; and the line of the Scheldt, Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges became the prize of the victors. It only needed four successful sieges which followed the battle of Ramillics to complete the deliverance of Flanders. The year which witnessed the victory of Ramillics remains yet more memorable as the year which witnessed the final Union of England with Scotland. As the undoing of the earlier union had been the first work of the Government of the Restoration, its revival was one of the first aims of the Government which followed IX THE REVOLUTION 1559 the Revolution. But the project was long held in check by sec. ix relia^ious and commercial jealousies. Scotland refused to bear any marl- ^ •> •' BOROUGH part of the English debt. England would not yield any share in 1698 TO her monopoly of trade with the colonies. The English Churchmen 1712 longed for a restoration of Episcopacy north of the border, while the Scotch Presbyterians would not hear even of the legal tolera- tion of Episcopalians. In 1703, however, an Act of Settlement which passed through the Scotch Parliament at last brought home to English statesmen the dangers of further delay. In dealing with this measure the Scotch Whigs, who cared only for the independence of their country, joined hand in hand with the Scotch Jacobites, who looked only to the interests of the Pretender. The Jacobites excluded from the Act the name of the Princess Sophia ; the Whigs introduced a provision that no sovereign of England should be recognized as sovereign of Scotland save upon security given to the religion, freedom, and trade of the Scottish people. Great as the danger arising from such a measure undoubtedly was, for it pointed to a recognition of the Pretender in Scotland on the Queen's death, and such a recognition meant war between Scotland and England, it was only after three years' delay that the wisdom and resolution of Lord Somers brought the question to an 1706 issue. The Scotch proposals of a federative rather than a legisla- tiv^e union were set aside by his firmness ; the commercial jealousies of the English trader were put by ; and the Act of Union provided that the two kingdoms should be united into one under the name of Great Britain, and that the succession to the crown of this United Kingdom should be ruled b}' the provisions of the English Act of Settlement. The Scotch Church and the Scotch law were left untouched : but all rights of trade were thrown open, and a uniform system of coinage adopted. A single Parliament was henceforth to represent the United Kingdom, and for this purpose forty-five Scotch members were added to the five hundred and thirteen English members of the House of Commons, and sixteen representative peers to the one hundred and eight who formed the English House of Lords. In Scf;tland the opposition was bitter and almost universal. The terror of the Presbyterians indeed \vas met by an Act of Security which became part of the Treat)' of Union and which required an oath to support the Presbyterian i;6o HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IX Makl- BOROUGH 1698 TO I7I2 Church from every sovereign on his accession. But no securities could satisfy the enthusiastic patriots or the fanatical Camcronians. The Jacobites sought troops from France and plotted a Stuart SECOND GREAT SEAL OF ANNE, 1707, < , m mfMuRATING THE UNION WITH SCOTLAND. (Obverse.) restoration. The nationalists talked of seceding from the Houses which voted for the Union, and of establishing a rival Parliament. In the end, however, good sense and the loyalty of the trading classes to the cause of the Protestant succession won their way. IX THE REVOLUTION 1561 The measure was adopted by the Scotch ParHament, and the sec. ix Treaty of Union became in 1707 a legislative act to which Anne inu^l- gave her assent in noble words. " I desire," said the Queen, " and TO I7I2 Its results SECOND GREAT SEAL OF ANNK, 1 707, ' 1 SCOILANU. (Reverse.) \ [ I \C. THE UNION WITH expect from my subjects of both nations that from henceforth they act with all possible respect and kindness to one another, that so it may appear to all the world they have hearts disposed t(^ become one people." Time lias more than answered these hopes. TJie 156: HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Marl- borough and the Whigs 1706 1706 two nations whom the Union brought together have ever since remained one, England gained in the removal of a constant danger of treason and war. To Scotland the Union opened up new avenues of wealth which the energy of its people turned to wonderful account. The farms of Lothian have become models of agricultural skill. A fishing town on the Clyde has grown into the rich and populous Glasgow. Peace and culture have changed the wild clansmen of the Highlands into herdsmen and farmers. Nor was the change followed by any loss of national spirit. The world has hardly seen a mightier and more rapid developement of national energy than that of Scotland after the Union. All that passed away was the jealousy which had parted since the days of Edward the First two peoples whom a common blood and com- mon speech proclaimed to be one. The Union between Scotland and England has been real and stable simply because it was the legislative acknowledgement and enforcement of a national fact. With the defeat of Ramillies the fortunes of France reached their lowest ebb. The loss of Flanders was followed by the loss of Italy after a victory by which Eugene relieved Turin ; and not only did Peterborough hold his ground in Spain, but Charles the Third with an army of English and Portuguese entered Madrid. Marlborough was at the height of his renown. Ramillies gave him strength enough to force Anne, in spite of her hatred of the Whigs, to fulfil his compact with them by admitting Lord Sunderland, the bitterest leader of their party, to office. But the system of political balance which he had maintained till now began at once to break down. Constitutionally, Marlborough's was the last attempt to govern England on other terms than those of party government, and the union of parties to which he had clung ever since his severance from the extreme Tories soon became impossible. The growing opposition of the Tories to the war threw the Duke more and more on the support of the Whigs, and the Whigs sold their support dearly. Sunderland, who had inherited his father's conceptions of party government, was resolved to restore a strict party administration on a purely Whig basis, and to drive the moderate Tories from office in spite of Marlborough's desire to retain them. The Duke wrote hotly home at the news of the pres- sure which the Whigs were putting on him. " England," he said, JUSKTH ADDISON. Picture by Sir Godfrey Kneller. opponents, though it roused the Duke to a burst of unusual passion in Parliament, effected its end by convincing him of the impos- sibility of further resistance. The opposition of the Queen indeed was stubborn and bitter. Anne was at heart a Tor)-, antl her okl trust in Marlborough died with his submission to the Whig demands. It was only by the threat of resignation that he had forced her to admit Sunderland to office ; and the violent outbreak of temper with which the Duchess enforced her husband's will changed the Queen's friendship for her into a bitter resentment. Marlborough was driven to increase this resentment by fresh compliances with IX THE REVOLUTION 1563 " will not be ruined because a few men are not pleased." Nor was Sec. ix Marlborough alone in his resentment. Harley foresaw the danoer Marl- BOROUGH of his expulsion from office, and began to intrigue at court, through 1698 Mrs. Masham, a bedchamber woman of the Queen, who was 1712 supplanting the Duchess in Anne's favour, against the Whigs and against Marlborough. St. John, who owed his early promotion to office to the Duke's favour, was driven by the same fear to share Harley's schemes. Marlborough strove to win both of them back, but he was helpless in the hands of the only party that steadily supported the war. A factious union of the Whigs with their ENGLISH SQUADRON CARRVING TROOPS TO TAKE POSSESSION OF DUNKIRK. ^'History c/ Queen Anne," 1740. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1565 the conditions which the Whigs imposed on him, by removing sec. ix Peterborough from his command as a Tory general, and by wrest- Marl- ° J ^ ^ J BOUOIGH ing from Anne her consent to the dismissal from office of Harley 1698 and St. John with the moderate Tories whom they headed. Their 1712 removal was followed by the complete triumph of the Whigs. Triumph Somers became President of the Council, Wharton Lord-Lieu- wl/^s tenant of Ireland, while lower posts were occupied by men destined 1708 to play a great part in our later history, such as the young Duke of Newcastle and Robert Walpole. Meanwhile, the great struggle abroad went on, with striking alternations of success. France rose with singular rapidity from the crushing blow of Ramillies. Spain was recovered for Philip by a victory of Marshal Berwick at Almanza. Villars won fresh triumphs on the Rhine, while Eugene, 1707 who had penetrated into Provence, was driven back into Italy. In Flanders, Marlborough's designs for taking advantage of his great victory were foiled by the strategy of the Duke of Vendome and by the reluctance of the Dutch, who were now wavering towards peace. In the campaign of 1708, however, Vendome, in spite of his superiority in force, was attacked and defeated at Oudenarde ; and Oude- though Marlborough was hindered from striking at the heart of ""^ ^ France by the timidity of the English and Dutch statesmen, he reduced Lille, the strongest of its frontier fortresses, in the face of an army of relief which numbered a hundred thousand men. The pride of Lewis was at last broken by defeat and by the terrible suffering of France. He offered terms of peace which yielded all that the allies had fought for. He consented to withdraw his aid from Philip of Spain, to give up ten P^lemish fortresses to the Dutch, and to surrender to the Empire all that France had gained since the Treaty of Westphalia. He offered to acknowledge Anne, to banish the Pretender from his dominions, and to demolish the fortifications of Dunkirk, a port hateful to England as the home of the French privateers. To Marlborough peace now seemed secure ; but in spite of his England counsels, the allies and the Whig Ministers in England demanded war that Lewis should with his own troops compel his grandson to give up the crown of Spain. " If I must wage war," replied the King, " I had rather wage it against my enemies than against my children." In a bitter despair he appealed to I''rancc ; and liATTI.E OF MALPLAQUET. '■^History cf Queen Anne," 1740. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1567 exhausted as it was, the campaign of 1709 proved how nobly France answered his appeal. The terrible slaughter which bears the name of the battle of Malplaquet showed a new temper in the French soldiers. Starving as they were, they flung away their rations in their eagerness for the fight, and fell back at its close in serried masses that no efforts of Marlborough could break. They had lost twelve thousand men, but the forcing their lines of entrench- ment had cost the allies a loss of double that number. Horror at such a "deluge of blood" increased the growing weariness of the war ; and the rejection of the French offers was unjustly attributed to a desire on the part of Marlborough of length- ening out a contest which brought him pro- fit and power. A storm of popular passion burst suddenly on the Whigs. Its occasion was a dull and silly sermon in which a High Church divine. Dr. Sachcverell, maintained the doctrine of non-resistance at St. Paul's, His boldness challenged prosecution ; but in spite of the warning of Marlborough and of Somcrs the Whig Ministers resolved on his impeachment before the Lords, and the trial at once widened into a great party struggle. An outburst of popular en- thusiasm in Sacheverell's favour showed what a storm of hatred had gathered against the Whigs and tlie war. The most eminent of the Tory Churchmen stood by his side at the bar, cnjwds escorted him to the court and back again, while the- streets rang OAcm TimildJrirellmihT'ridejft/im car&'d. But/i£ henns hm^lelhffughls rtmhn JdiBre/ut SACHKVERELL S TRIUMPH. Design for Playing-Card, 1710. British Miiscmn. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Mai- plaquet Sachc- verell 1568 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Fall of Marl- borough with cries of " The Church and Dr. Sachevcrell." A small majority of the peers found the preacher guilty, but the light sentence they inflicted was in effect an acquittal, and bonfires and illuminations over the whole country welcomed it as a Tory triumph. The party whom the Whigs had striven to crush were roused to new life. The expulsion of Harley and St. John from the Ministry had given the Tories leaders of a more subtle and vigorous stamp than the High Churchmen who had quitted office in the first years of the war, and St. John brought into play a new engine of political attack whose powers soon made themselves felt. In the Examiner and in a crowd of pam- phlets and periodicals which followed in its train, the humour of Prior, the bitter irony of Swift, and St. John's own brilliant sophistry spent themselves on the abuse of the war and of its general. " Six mil- SeeJfVldcn Citizens mthHeart and Voice, C/aueZcyal Mandm drntd^ave^arOinte, Design for PlayingCard, 17 10. British Museum. lions of supplies and almost fifty millions of debt !" Swift wrote bit- terly ; " the High Allies have been the ruin of us ! " Marlborough was ridiculed and reviled, he was accused of insolence, cruelty and ambition, of corruption and greed. Even his courage was called in question. The turn of popular feeling freed Anne at once from the pressure beneath which she had bent : and the subtle intrigue of Harley was busy in undermining the Ministry. The Whigs, who knew the Duke's alliance with them had simply been forced on him by the war, were easily persuaded that the Queen had no aim but THE REVOLUTION 1569 The Qiueniz/d/irrfsyi, andh^n&vSen/ifr fold, Design for Playing-Card, 1710 British Museum. Marl- BOROLGH 1698 TO of the VVhigs I7I0 to humble him, and looked coolly on at the dismissal of his son-in- Sec. ix law, Sunderland, and his friend, Godolphin. Marlborough on his part was lured by hopes of reconciliation with his old party, and looked on as coolly while Anne dismissed the Whig Ministers and 1712 appointed a Tory Ministry in their place, with Harley and St. John Dis7uissal at its head. But the intrigues of Harley paled before the subtle treason of St. John. Resolute to drive Marlborough from his command, he fed the Duke's hopes of re- conciliation with the Tories, till he led him to acquiesce in his wife's dismissal, and to pledge himself to a co-operation with the Tory policy. It was the Duke's belief that a reconciliation with the Tories was effected that led him to sanc- tion the despatch of troops which should have strengthened his army in Flanders on a fruitless expedition against Canada, though this left him too weak to carry out a masterly plan which he had formed for a march into the heart of France in the opening of 171 1. He was unable even to risk a battle or to do more than to pick up a few seaboard towns, and St. John at once turned the small results of the campaign into an argument for the conclusion of j)cace. In defiance of an article of the Grand Alliance which pledged its members not to carry on .separate negotiations with France, St. John, who now became Lord Bolingbrokc, pushed forward a secret accommodation between England and I'"rance. It was for this ni'gotialion that he had I570 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. IX crippled Marlborough's campaign ; and it was the discovery of his Marl- pcrfidv which revealed to the Duke how utterly he had been BOROUGH ^ ^ J 1698 betrayed, and forced him at last to break with the Tory Ministry. TO 1712 He returned to England ; and his efforts induced the House of Lords to denounce the contemplated peace ; but the support of the Commons and the Queen, and the general hatred of the war among the people, enabled Harley to ride down all resistance. At the opening of 1712 the Whig majority in the House of Lords was swamped by the creation of twelve Tory peers. Marlborough was dismissed from his command, charged with peculation, and condemned as guilty by a vote of the House of Commons. The Duke at once withdrew from England, and with his withdrawal all opposition to the peace was at an end. Treaty of Marlborough's flight was followed by the conclusion of a Treaty Utrecht , ^ 1 713 at Utrecht between France, England, and the Dutch ; and the desertion of his allies forced the Emperor at last to make peace at Rastadt. By these treaties the original aim of the war, that of preventing the possession of France and Spain by the House of Bourbon, was abandoned. No precaution was taken against the dangers it involved to the " balance of power," save by a provision that the two crowns should never be united on a single head, and by Philip's renunciation of all right of succession to the throne of France. The principle on which the Treaties were based was in fact that of the earlier Treaties of Partition. Philip retained Spain and the Indies : but he ceded his possessions in Italy and the Netherlands with the island of Sardinia to Charles of Austria, who had now become Emperor, in satisfaction of his claims ; while he handed over Sicily to the Duke of Savoy. To England he gave up not only Minorca but Gibraltar, two positions which secured her the command of the Mediterranean. France had to consent to the re-establishment of the Dutch barrier on a greater scale than before ; to pacify the English resentment against the French privateers by the dismantling of Dunkirk ; and not only to recog- nize the right of Anne to the crown, and the Protestant succession in the House of Hanover, but to consent to the expulsion of the Pretender from her soil. The failure of the Queen's health made the succession the real question of the day, and it was a question which turned all politics into faction and intrigue. The Whigs, THE REVOLUTION 1571 who were still formidable in the Commons, and who showed the strength of their party in the Lords by defeating a Treaty of Commerce, in which Bolingbroke anticipated the greatest financial triumph of William Pitt and secured freedom of trade between England and France, were zealous for the succession of the Sec. IX Marl- borough 1698 TO I7I2 Hurley and Boling- broke HENRY ST. JOHN, VISCOfNT liOI.I.NCIiROKE. Picture by Sir G. Kneller, at Petworth. Elector ; nor did the Tories really contemplate any other plan. But on the means of providing for his succession Ilarley and Bolingbroke differed widely. Ilarley inclined to an alliance between the moderate Tories and the Wlii;.;-^. Tlic polic)- of Bolingbroke, on the other hand, was .so to strengthen the Tories by Vol. IV— Part 34 5 1 1572 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. IX the Utter overthrow of their opponents, that whatever might be the Marl- Elcctor's S}'mpathics they could force their policy on him as King. 1698 To ruin his rival's influence he introduced a Schism Bill, which TO 1712 kOKlKI HAIIM, 1 \K1 (I! ( i\FuRD I toin an en^ta-in^ h J ' ^'^ Hiuhttnluig hindered any Nonconformist from acting as a schoolmaster or a tutor ; and which broke Harlcy's plans by creating a more bitter division than ever between Tory and Whig. But its success went IX THE REVOLUTION 1573 beyond his intentions. The Whigs regarded the Bill as the first step in a Jacobite restoration. The Electress Sophia was herself alarmed, and the Hanoverian ambassador demanded for the son of the Elector, the future George the Second, who had been created Duke of Cambridge, a summons as peer to the coming Parliament, with the aim of securing the presence in England of a Hanoverian Prince in case of the Queen's death. The Queen's anger, fanned Sec. IX Marl- bokoui;k 1698 TO I7I2 EMBLEMS OF THE SILVERSMITHS CRAFT, 1 70O. Bagford Collection, British Miiscutii. by Bolingbroke, broke out in a letter to the Electress which warned her that "such conduct may imperil the succession itself ; " and in July Anne was brought to dismiss Harlcy, now Earl of Oxford, and to construct a strong and united Tory Minis(r\- which would back her in her resistance to the Elector's demand. As the crisis grew nearer, both parties ])rc]')arcd for ci\-il war. In the beginning of 1714 the Whigs had made read)- for a rising on the Queen's death, and invited Marlborougli from J'"laiidcrs to iicad 5 I 2 ^ ^l/Oib arc dmred to ttz^ tJie. ^f J (Jw'llUfteiy af^^ Lfoicu'Tnidvs atdwQ^/rufi \]'/mrrAof c^ U^^rtriiZ luarX^uddhali cm (J^^cdai/ .tkctSLXtJi doLf ct '^&(Trucoru j707 atmnc Ofckc Clxrc/b in, the ^(ojyuTw areas elu tficre to keoj- a Scrmmi y^frcm tJiaici tadcconi - -pa/pAJ u &tj(lUsnulh^ hate LnfJ^astcrL^^ ruit/i ■^ ^ A(^ /^^ V^) /W^ 'W^ A INVITATION TO A MEETING OF THE GOLDSMITHS' COMPANY, 1 707. Bagford Collection, British Museum. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1575 them, in the hope that his name would rally the army to their cause. Bolingbroke, on the other hand, intent on building up a strong Tory party, made the Duke of Ormond, whose sympathies were known to be in favour of the Pretender's succession. Warden of the Cinque Ports, the district in which either claimant of the crown must land, while he gave Scotland in charge to the Jacobite Sec. IX Makl- BOKOL'GH 1698 TO I7I2 THE ROYAL SOCIETY'S LETTER. IHave (hy Order of the Royal Society) f.-en and * eva" nei he Methoduftdby Mr J OH N MAR- ; SHALL, fo grinding Glafles ; and find ihat he re- forms the fail Work wi h greater Eale and Certa nty than hi hi;r:o hasbcen pra(fliled ; byniejns of an In- ir vcntion which I take to be his own, an) New and ■whereby he is enabled to 'rake a great number of Op- | tick-Glafllsatone time, and all exaflly alike; which I having reported to the Royal Society, they were plcafcd — to approve thereof, as an Invention uf great ufcj aad Jiighly to dcferie Ercouragemem. Lend. Jan. i8- By the Command of the '*93i4. Royal Scdcty; E D M. H A L L E Y, Note, Thcsfs "Cries." Peter the Great, for a restoration of the Stuarts. Luckily for the new dynasty his plans were brought to an end by his death at the siege of Frederickshall ; but the policy which provoked them had already brought about the dissolu- tion of the Ministry. In assenting to a treaty of alliance with Hanover against Sweden, they had yielded to the fact that Bremen and Verden were not only of the highest import- ance to Hanover, which was thus brought into contact with the sea, but of hardly less value to England, as they secured the mouths of the Elbe and the Weser, the chief inlets for British commerce into Germany, in the hands of a friendly state. But they refused to go further in carrying out a Hanoverian policy ; the anger of the King was seconded by intrigues among the ministers ; and in 1 7 17 Townshend and Walpole had been forced to resign their posts. In the reconstituted cabinet Lords Sunderland and Stanhope re- mained supreme ; and their first aim was to secure the maintenance of the Whig power by a constitutional change. Harley's creation of twelve peers to ensure the sanction of the Lords to the Treaty of Utrecht showed that the Crown possessed a power of swamping the majority in the House of Peers. In 1720 therefore the Ministry introduced a bill, suggested as was believed by .Sunderland, which profe.s.sed to secure the liberty of the Upper House by limiting the i)ower of the Crown in the creation of fresh I'cers. The minihci- of Peers was permanently fi.xed at the number then sitting in the House; and creations could only be made when vacancies occurred. 5 K 2 ".\ bra.ss J'oit or .-ui iron J'utt to mend." Tempest's " Cries.' Sec. X Walpole 1712 TO 1742 I718 Englajid and Hanover The PrcraiTf Bifl I590 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. X Walpole 1712 TO 1742 "Buy my Dutch Biskets Tempest's "Cn'cs." Twenty-five hereditary Scotch Peers were substituted for the sixteen elected Peers for Scotland. The bill however was strenu- ously opposed by Walpole. It would in fact have rendered representative government impossible. P"or repre- sentative government was now coming day by day more completely to mean government by the will of the House of Commons, carried out by a Minis- try which served as the mouthpiece of that will. But it was only through the prerogative of the Crown, as ex- ercised under the advice of such a Ministry, that the Peers could be forced to bow to the will of the Lower House in matters where their opinion was adverse to it ; and the proposal of Sunderland would have brought legislation and government to a dead lock. The Peerage Bill owed its defeat to Walpole's opposition ; and his rivals were forced to admit him, with Townshend, into the Ministry, though they held sub- ordinate places. But this soon gave way to a more natural arrangement. South Sea The suddcn increase of English com- merce begot at this moment the mania of speculation. Ever since the age of Elizabeth the unknown wealth of Spanish America had acted like a, spell upon the imagination of Eng- lishmen ; and Harley gave counten- ance to a South Sea Company, which promised a reduction of the public debt as the price of a monopoly of the Spanish trade. Spain however clung jealously to her old prohibi- tions of all foreign commerce ; and the Treaty of Utrecht only won for England the right of engaging in the negro slave-trade, and of despatching a single ship to the Bubble "Fine Writeing Inke.' Teinjiest's ''Cries." IX THE REVOLUTION 1591 coast of Spanish America. But in spite of all this, the Company again came forward, offering in exchange for new privileges to pay- off national burdens which amounted to nearly a million a year. It Sec. X Walpole 1712 TO 1742 LOJXDI\ES fix "IH "Ilk «i,l •"" TRADE LABEL (Jl- THK bOUTH SEA CUMrA.NV. Ciiiliihall Aliiicicm. was in vain that Walpole warned the Ministry and the countr}^ against this "dream." Ikjth went mad ; and in 1720 bubble Com- pany followed bubble Conipan}-, till the inevitable reaction brought a general ruin in its train. The crash brought Stanhope to the 1592 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec X grave. Of his colleagues, many were found to have received walpolk bribes from the South Sea Company to back its frauds. Craggs, 1712 TO the Secretary of State, died of terror at the investigation ; Aislabie, — -" the Chancellor of the Exchequer, was sent to the Tower ; and in the general wreck of his rivals Walpole mounted again into power Walpoles In 1 72 1 he became First Lord of the Treasury, while Townshend Ministry ^ r r- ti 1 • 1 • returned to his post of Secretary of State. Jiut then" relative position was now reversed. Townshend had been the head in their earlier administration : in this Walpole was resolved, to use his own characteristic phrase, that " the firm should be Walpole and Townshend and not Townshend and Walpole." Walpoles If no Minister has fared worse at the hands of poets and Policy historians, there are few whose greatness has been more impartially recognized by practical statesmen. The years of his power indeed are years without parallel in our history for political stagnation. His long administration of more than twenty years is almost without a history. All legislative and political activity seemed to cease with his entry into office. Year after year passed by without a change. In the third year of his IMinistry there was but one division in the House of Commons. The Tory members were so few that for a time they hardly cared to attend its sittings ; and in 1722 the loss of Bishop Atterbury of Rochester, who was convicted of correspondence with the Pretender, deprived of his bishopric, and banished by Act of Parliament, deprived the Jacobites of their only remaining leader. Walpole's one care was to maintain the quiet which was reconciling the country to the system of the Revolution. But this inaction fell in with the temper of the nation at large. It was popular with the class which commonly presses for political activity. The energy of the trading class was ab- sorbed in the rapid extension of commerce and accumulation of wealth. So long as the country was justly and temperately governed the merchant and shopkeeper were content to leave government in the hands that held it. All they asked was to be let alone to enjoy their new freedom, and develope their new industries. And Walpole let them alone. Progress became material rather than political, but the material progress of the country was such as P^ngland had never seen before. The work of keeping England quiet and of giving quiet to Europe, was in itself THE REVOLUTION 1593 a noble one ; and it is the temper with which he carried on this work which gives Walpole his place among English statesmen. He was the first and he was the most successful of our Peace Ministers. " The most pernicious circumstances," he said, " in which this country can be are those of war ; as we must be losers while it lasts, and cannot be great gainers when it ends." It was not that the honour or influence of England suffered in his hands, for he won victories by the firmness of his policy and the skill of his negotiations as effectual as any which are won by arms. But in spite of the complications of foreign affairs, and the pressure from the Court and the Opposition, it is the glory of Walpole that he resolutely kept England at peace. Peace indeed was hard to maintain. The Emperor Charles the Sixth had issued a Pragmatic Sec. X Walpoi.k 1712 TO 1742 MEDAL CO.MMFMORATING THE SIEGE OF GIBRALTAR, I727. Sanction, by which he provided that his hereditary dominions Fresh should descend unbroken to his daughter, Maria Theresa ; but no s/Jaiu European State had yet consented to guarantee her succession. Spain, still resolute to regain her lost possessions, and her old monopoly of trade with her American colonies, seized the oppor- tunity of detaching the Emperor from the alliance of the Eour Powers, which left her isolated in Europe. She promised to sup- port the Pragmatic Sanction in return for a pledge from Charles to aid in wresting Gibraltar and Minorca from England, and in se- curing to a Spanish prince tiic succession to Parma, Piacenza, am! Tuscany. A grant of the highest trading privileges in her American dominions to a commercial company which the I'^^inpcror had established at Ostcnd, in defiance of the Treat}' of \\ i-.sti)halia 1594 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. 1712 1742 172; sfx. X and the remonstrances of England and Holland, revealed this Wali'ole secret alliance ; and there were fears of the adhesion of Russia. The danger was met for a while by an alliance of England, France, and Prussia ; but the withdrawal of the last Power again gave courage to the confederates, and in 1727 the Spaniards besieged Gibraltar, while Charles threatened an invasion of Holland. The moderation of Walpole alone averted a European war. While sending British squadrons to the Baltic, the Spanish coast, and America, he succeeded by diplomatic pressure in again forcing the 1729 Emperor to inaction ; Spain was at last brought to sign the Treaty of Seville, and to content herself with a promise of the succession of a Spanish prince to the Duchies of Parma and Tuscany ; and the discontent of Charles at this concession was allayed in 1731 by giving the guarantee of England to the Pragmatic Sanction. Walpole s As Walpole was the first of our Peace Ministers, so he was the first of our Financiers. He was far indeed from discerning the powers which later statesmen have shown to exist in a sound finance, but he had the sense to see, what no minister had till then seen, that the wisest course a statesman can take in presence of a great increase in national industry and national wealth is to look quietly on and let it alone. At the outset of his rule he declared in a speech from the Throne that nothing would more conduce to the extension of commerce " than to make the exportation of our own manufactures, and the importation of the commodities used in the manufacturing of them, as practicable and easy as may be." The first act of his financial administration was to take off the duties from more than a hundred British exports, and nearly forty articles of importation. In 1730 he broke in the same enlightened spirit through the prejudice which restricted the commerce of the colonies to the mother-country alone, by allowing Georgia and the Carolinas to export their rice directly to any part of Europe. The result was that the rice of America soon drove that of Italy and Egypt from the market. His Excise Bill, defective as it was, was the first measure in which an English Minister showed any real grasp of the principles of taxation. The wisdom of Walpole was rewarded by a quick upgrowth of prosperity. Our exports, which were si.x millions in \-alue at the beginning of the century, had doubled by the middle of it. The rapid developement of the IX THE REVOLUTION 1595 Colonial trade gave England a new wealth. In Manchester and Birmingham, whose manufactures were now becoming of import- ance, population doubled in thirty years. Bristol, the chief seat of the West Indian trade, rose into new prosperity. Liverpool, which owes its creation to the new trade with the West, sprang Sec. X Walpole 1712 TO 1742 JONATHAN SWIFT, DEAN OF S. PATRICK S, DUHLIN. From an engraving by E. ^ci'iven, after !•'. Bhuioii. up from a little countrx' town into the third port of the kingdom. With peace and sccurit\-, and the wealth that they brought with them, the value of land, and with it the rental of every count'}- gentleman, rose fast. Ikit this up-grouth of wealth around liiin never made Walpole swer\c frc^m a rigid ec(jnom\', from the 1596 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. X Walpole 1712 TO 1742 Walpole and the Parlia- ment Steady reduction of the debt, or the diminution of fiscal duties. ICvcn before the death of George the First the pubHc burdens were reduced by twenty niiUions. The accession of George the Second in 1727 seemed to give a fatal shock to Wal pole's power ; for the new King was known to have hated his father's Minister hardly less than he had hated his father. Ikit hale Walpole as he might, the King was absolutely guided by the adroitness of his wife, Caroline of Anspach ; and Caroline had resolved that there should be no chano-e in the ALEXANDER POPE. Picture at C/u'siukk House. ^Ministry. The years which followed were in fact those in which George the W'alpolc's power reached its height. He gained as great an influence over George the Second as he had gained over his father. His hold over the House of Commons remained unshaken. The country was tranquil and prosperous. The prejudices of the landed gentry were met by a stead}^ effort to reduce the land- tax. The Church was quiet. The Jacobites were too hopeless to stir. A few trade measures and social reforms crept quietly through the Houses. An inquiry into the state of the gaols showed that social thought was not utterly dead. A bill of great IX THE REVOLUTION 1597 value enacted that all proceedings in courts of justice should henceforth be in the English language. Only once did Walpole break this tranquillity by an attempt at a great measure of states- manship. No tax had from the first moment of its introduction been more unpopular than the Excise. Its origin was due to Pym and the Long Parliament, who imposed duties on beer, cyder, and perry, which at the Restoration produced an annual income of more than six hundred thousand pounds. The war with France brought with it the malt-tax, and additional duties on spirits, wine, tobacco, and other articles. So great had been the increase in the public wealth that the return from the Excise amounted at the death of George the First to nearly two millions and a half a year. But its unpopularity remained unabated, and even philoso- phers like Locke contended that the whole public revenue should be drawn from direct taxes upon the land. Walpole, on the other hand, saw in the growth of indirect taxation a means of winning over the country gentry to the new dynasty of the Revolution by freeing the land from all burdens whatever. Smuggling and fraud diminished the revenue by immense sums. The loss on tobacco alone amounted to a third of the whole dut}'. The Excise Bill of 1733 met this evil by the establishment of bonded warehouses, and by the collection of the duties from the inland dealers in the form of Excise and not of Customs. The first measure would have made London a free port, and doubled English trade. The second would have so largely increased the revenue, without any loss to the consumer, as to enable Walpole to repeal the land-tax. In the case of tea and coffee alone, the change in the mode of levying the duty w^as estimated to bring in an additional hundred thousand pounds a year. The necessaries of life and the raw materials of manufacture were in Walpole's plan to remain absolutely untaxed. The scheme was an anticipa- tion of the principles which have guided English finance since the triumph of free trade ; but in 1733 Walpole stood ahead of his time. A violent agitation broke out ; riots almost grew into revolt ; and in spite of the Queen's wish to j)ut down resistance by force, Walpole withdrew the bill. " I will not be the Minister," he said with noble .self-command, " to enforce ta.xes at the cxpcn.se of blood." What had fanned poinilar prijiidici' inlo a llame Sec. X Walpole 1712 TO 1742 Excise Bill THE IIUUSE OF CO.MMoN.-i IN WALPOI.F. s ADMINISTRATION. From A. Fagg s engraz-ing Of a picture by Hogarth and Thortihill. CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1599 1712 TO 1742 during the uproar was the violence of the so-called " Patriots." Sec. x In the absence of a strong opposition and of great impulses to ^v.^LroLE enthusiasm a party breaks readily into factions ; and the weakness of the Tories joined with the stagnation of public affairs to breed faction among the Whigs. Walpole too was jealous of power ; Patriots and as his jealousy drove colleague after colleague out of office, they became leaders of a party whose sole aim was to thrust him from his post. Greed of power indeed was the one passion which mastered his robust common-sense. Townshend was turned out of office in 1730, Lord Chesterfield in 1733 ; and though he started with the ablest administration the country had known, Walpole was left after twenty years of supremacy with but one man of ability in his cabinet, the Chancellor, Lord Hardwicke. With the single exception of Townshend, the colleagues whom his jealousy dismissed plunged into an opposition more factious and un- principled than has ever disgraced English politics. The " Patriots," as they called themselves, owned Pulteney as their head ; they were reinforced by a band of younger Whigs — the " Boys," as Walpole named them — whose temper revolted alike against the inaction and cynicism of his policy, and whose spokes- man was a young cornet of horse, William Pitt ; and they rallied to these the fragment of the Tory party which still took part in politics, and which was guided for a while by the virulent ability of Bolingbroke, whom Walpole had suffered to return from exile, but to whom he had refused the restoration of his seat in the House of Lords. But Walpole's defeat on the Excise Bill had done little to shake his power, and Bolingbroke withdrew to France in despair at the failure of his efforts. Abroad the first signs of a new danger showed themselves in The 1733, when the peace of Europe was broken afresh by disputes ^^j. which rose out of a contested election to the throne of Poland. Austria and France were alike drawn into the strife ; and in England the awakening jealousy of P^rench designs roused a new pressure for war. The new King too was eager to fight, and her German .sympathies inclined even Caroline to join in the fra}-. But W^alpole stood firm for the observance of neutralit)-. " There arc fifty thousand men slain this year in Europe," he boasted as the strife went on, "and not one ICnglishman." The intcrxcntion CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION i6oi of England and Holland succeeded in 1736 in restoring peace; Sec. x but the countr)' noted bitterly that peace was bought by the walpole 1712 triumph of both branches of the House of Bourbon. A new to Bourbon monarchy was established at the cost of the House of — Austria by the cession of the Two Sicilies to a Spanish Prince, in exchange for his right of succession to Parma and Tuscan}'. On the other hand, Lorraine passed finally into the hands of France. The birth of children to Lewis the Fifteenth had settled all The r • • T- 1 11 -1 Family questions 01 succession in r ranee, and no obstacle remained to Compact hinder their family sympathies from uniting the Bourbon Courts in a common action. As early as 1733 a Family Compact had been secretly concluded between France and Spain, the main object of which was the ruin of the maritime supremacy of Britain. Spain bound herself to deprive England gradually of its commercial privileges in her American dominions, and to transfer them to France. France in return engaged to support Spain at sea, and to aid her in the recover}^ of Gibraltar. The caution with which Walpole held aloof from the Polish war rendered this com- pact inoperative for the time ; but neither of the Bourbon courts ceased to look forward to its future execution. No sooner was the war ended than France strained every nerve to increase her fleet ; while Spain steadily tightened the restrictions on British commerce with her American colonies. The trade with Spanish EuirJaud America, which, illegal as it was, had grown largely through the connivance of Spanish port-officers during the long alliance of England and Spain in the wars against France, had at last re- ceived a legal recognition in the Peace of Utrecht. It was indeed left under narrow restrictions ; but these were evaded by a \ast .system of smuggling which rendered what remained of the Spanish monopoly all but valueless. The efforts of Philip however to bring down English intercourse with his colonics to the importa- tion of negroes and the despatch of a single ship, as stipulated by the Treaty of Utrecht, brought about collisions which made it hard to keep the peace. The ill-humour of the trading classes ro.se to madness in 1738 when a merchant captain named Jenkins told at the bar of the House of Commons the tale of his torture by the Spaniards, and produced an ear which, he said, thc\' had cut off with taunts at the English king. It was in \ain llial CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1603 Sec. X Walpole 1712 TO 1742 Walpole strove to do justice to both parties, and that he battled stubbornly against the cry for an unjust and impolitic war. The Emperor's death was now close at hand ; and at such a juncture it was of the highest importance that England should be free to avail herself of every means to guard the European settlement. But his efforts were in vain. His negotiations were foiled by the frenzy of the one country and the pride of the other. At home his enemies assailed him with a storm of abuse. Ballad-singers trolled out their rimes to the crowd on the " cur-dog of Britain and spaniel of Spain." His position had been weakened by the death of the Queen ; and it was now weakened yet more by the open hostility of the Prince of Wales. His mastery of the House of Commons too was no longer unquestioned. The Tories were slowly returning to Parliament. The numbers and the violence of the " Patriots " had grown with the open patronage of Prince Frederick. The country was slowly turning against him. With the cry for a commercial war the support of the trading class failed him. But it was not till he stood utterly alone that Walpole gave way and that he consented in 1739 to a war against Spain. " They may ring their bells now," the great minister said bitterly, as peals and bonfires welcomed his surrender ; " but they P will soon be wringing their hands." His foresight was at once justified. No sooner had Admiral Vernon appeared off the coast of South America with an English fleet, and captured Porto Bcllo, than France formally declared that she would not consent to any English settlement on the mainland of South America, and despatched two squad- rons to the West Indies. At this crisis the death of Charles the Sixth forced on the European struggle which Walpole had dreaded. France saw her opportunity for finishing the work which Henry the Second had begun of breaking up the Empire into a group of powers too weak to resist French aggression. While the new King of Prussia, Frederick the Second, claimed Silesia, Bavaria claimed the Austrian Duchies, which pas.sed with the other hereditary dominions, according to the Vol.. IV— Part 35 5 I- Fall of MKDAI, ON CAPTURE OF I'ORTOHELLO, 1 739. The Austrian Succession 1740 t 7 -' ll'TPilifll ' -f i'ir VT' 'N 2 «" ^ I' < 5 CHAP. IX THE REVOLUTION 1605 Pragmatic Sanction, to the Queen of Hungary, Maria Theresa. In Sec. x union therefore with Spain, which aimed at the annexation of the Walpole Milanese, France promised her aid to Prussia and Bavaria ; while -^o Sweden and Sardinia allied themselves to France. In the summer 11." of 1 741 two French armies entered Germany, and the Elector of Bavaria appeared unopposed before Vienna. Never had the House of Austria stood in such peril. Its opponents counted on a division of its dominions. France claimed the Netherlands, Spain the ]\Iilanese, Bavaria the kingdom of Bohemia, Frederick the Second Silesia. Hungary and the Duchy of Austria alone were left to Maria Theresa. Walpole, though still true to her cause, advised her to purchase Frederick's aid against France and her allies by the cession of part of Silesia ; but the " Patriots " spurred her to i-efusal by promising her the aid of England. Walpole's last hope of rescuing Austria was broken, and Frederick was driven to conclude an alliance with France. But the Queen refused to despair. She won the support of Hungary by restoring its constitutional rights ; and British subsidies enabled her to march at the head of a Hungarian army to the rescue of Vienna, to overrun Bavaria, and repulse an attack of Frederick on Moravia in the spring of 1742. On England's part, however, the war was waged feebly and ineffectively. Admiral Vernon was beaten before Carthagena ; and Walpole was charged with thwarting and starving the war. He still repelled the attacks of the " Patriots " Rcsigna- with wonderful spirit ; but in a new Parliament his majority {y"i!}(r dropped to sixteen, and in his own cabinet he became almost powerless. The buoyant temper which had carried him through so many storms broke down at last. " He who was asleep as soon as his head touched the pillow," writes his son, " now never sleeps above an hour without waking: and he who at dinner alwaj's forgot his own anxieties, and was more gay and thoughtless than all the company, now sits without speaking, and with his eyes fixed for an hour together." The end was in fact near ; and in the opening of 1742 the dwindling of his majority to three forced Walpole to resign. THE STATE LOTTERY. T •Aruji City-^i^wi Country ncnJifud' (t/i**" 3^i clie 3 : fo' mount /^ g-ilt Qiari ot, a/i^ vU tvU/i./u4^f!&.er: M^v Loi'd , nrfur cUt-eivdu /ui<< TKoxilanda a.Je^ Aur Iixcoone In^ I'e^uAm^ U\\.eve\ i^y^^^/i*^ fair HaiuJs/^7^A< i/z/j^fV-LadiOjGJVGcrv^ ^rTickets lviiairvhun.tker£exCY!a.oxS.vcQ.AYcn'sh.is ecujer/u nttz/c/i 'd , 7r4re JuiXAtrdtt /u4rAM.,/vr tn'jtdi>e. Built 1727. Coates, "History 0/ Reading.' established " circulating schools " in Wales, for religious education. The rural peasantry, who were fast being reduced to pauperism by the abuse of the poor-laws, were left without much moral or religious training of any sort. " We saw but one Bible in the parish of Cheddar," said Hannah IMore at a far later time, " and MODERN ENGLAND i6i I that was used to prop a flower-pot." Within the towns things sec. i were worse. There was no effective police ; and in great outbreaks William the mob of London or Birmingham burnt houses, flung open 1742 TO prisons, and sacked and pillaged at their will. The criminal 1762 class gathered boldness and numbers in the face of ruthless laws which only testified to the terror of society, laws which made it a FROME SCHOOL (BUILT I720) AND BRIDGE. Drawing in British Museum. capital crime to cut down a cherry tree, and which strung up twenty young thieves of a morning in front of Newgate ; while the introduction of gin gave a new impetus to drunkenness, in the streets of London at (jnc time gin-shops invited every passcr-l>\' to get drunk for a penny, or dead drunk for twoi)encc. In spite however of scenes such as this, iMTjiand rcin.iiiu'd at | '^.'-* ^ ... Rclif^ious heart religious. In the midtlle class the old i'liiilan s[)irit lix'cd Revival i6i HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. I William Put 1742 TO 1762 on unchanged, and it was from this class that a rcHgious revival burst forth at the close of Walpole's administration, which changed after a time the whole tone of English society. The Church was restored to life and activit}'. Religion carried to the hearts of the people a fresh spirit of moral zeal, while it purified our literature and our manners. A new philanthropy reformed our prisons, DEAN BERKELEY, HJS WIFE, AND FELLOW MISSIONARIES. Picture by J. Siitybert, at Yale College, Rhode Island. The Met hod is Is infused clcmcnc)' and wisdom into our penal laws, abolished the slave trade, and gave the first impulse to popular education. The revival began in a small knot of Oxford students, whose revolt against the religious deadness of their times showed itself in ascetic observances, an enthusiastic devotion, ^and a methodical regularity of life which gained them the nickname of " Methodists." Three figures detached themselves from the group as soon as, on MODERN ENGLAND 1613 its transfer to London in 1738, it attracted public attention by the fervour and even extravagance of its piety ; and each found his special work in the task to which the instinct of the new move- ment led it from the first, that of carrying religion and morality to the vast masses of population which lay concentrated in the towns, or around the mines and collieries of Cornwall and the north. W'hitefield, a servitor of Pembroke College, was above all Sec. 1 William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 IVhite- Jield GKOKGK VVHITEFIELD. Picture by Nathaniel Hone. the preacher of the revival. Speech was governing English politics ; and the religious i)Ower of speech was shown when a dread of "enthusiasm" closed against the new apostles the pulpits of the ICstablished Church, and forced tliein Yo jireacli in the fields. Their voice was soon heard in the wildest and most barbarous corners of the land, among the l)leak moors of Northum- berland, or in the dens of London, or in the long galleries wIutc i6i4 HISTORY OF '1"HE KXOLISH PEOPLE chm- Sec. I in the pauses of his labour the Cornish miner listens to the sobbing wn.LiAM of the sea. Whitcficld's preaching was such as England had 1742 never heard before, theatrical, extravagant, often commonplace, but TO 1762 hushing all criticism by its intense reality, its earnestness of belief, its deep tremulous sympathy with the sin and sorrow of mankind. It was no common enthusiast who could wring gold from the close-fisted Franklin and admiration from the fastidious Horace Walpole, or who could look down from the top of a green knoll at Kingswood on twenty thousand colliers, grimy from the Bristol coal-pits, and see as he preached the tears " making white channels down their blackened checks." On the rough and ignorant masses to whom they spoke the effect of Whitefield and his fellow Methodists w^as mighty both for good and ill. Their preaching stirred a passionate hatred in their opponents. Their lives were often in danger, the\' were mobbed, they were ducked, the\- were stoned, they were smothered with filth. But the enthusiasm they aroused was equally passionate. Women fell down in convulsions ; strong men were smitten suddenly to the earth ; the preacher was interrupted by bursts of hysteric laughter or of hysteric sobbing. All the phenomena of strong spiritual excitement, so familiar now, but at that time strange and unknown, followed on their sermons ; and the terrible sense of a conviction of sin, a new dread of hell, a new hope of heaven, took forms at once grotesque and sublime. Charles Charles Wesley, a Christ Church student, came to add sweetness ^^^■^ to this sudden and startling light. He was the " sweet singer" of the movement. PI is hymns expressed the fiery conviction of its converts in lines so chaste and beautiful that its more extravagant features disappeared. The wild throes of hysteric enthusiasm passed into a passion for hymn-singing, and a new musical impulse was aroused in the people which gradually changed the face of public devotion throughout England. John But it was his elder brother, John Wesley, who embodied in him- Wesley ggif ^^^ ^j^jg qj. y^^^^ gj^j^ ^^ ^|^^ j^^^^. ^novement, but the movement itself. Even at Oxford, where he resided as a fellow of Lincoln, he had been looked upon as head of the group of Methodists, and after his return from a quixotic mission to the Indians of Georgia he again took the lead of the little society, which had removed in the interval to London. In power as a preacher he MODERN ENGLAND stood next to Whitefield ; as a hymn-writer he stood second to his brother Charles. But while combining" in some degree the excellences of either, he possessed qualities in which both were utterly deficient ; an indefatigable industry, a cool judgement, a command over others, a faculty of organization, a singular union of patience and moderation with an imperious ambition, which marked 1615 Sec. 1 William PiTr 1742 TO 1762 JOHN WESLEY. Pictit7e by William Hamillon. him as a ruler of men. lie had besides a learning and skill in writing which no other of the Methodists possessed ; he was older than any of his colleagues at the start of the movement, and he out- lived them all. 11 is life indeed almost covers the centur>', and the Methodist bo(i\- li.ul passed through e\ciy phase of its histor)' ,-oj 1791 before he sank into the grave at the age of eighty-eight. It would ha\'e been impossible for Wesley to have wielded the power he did i6i6 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. I had he not shared the folHes and cxtravaj^ance as well as the William cntliusiasm of liis disciules. Throum ihi'^ I'itl 5 N ^ Sec. 1 William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 1756 William Pitt A'c7iicasf/c ant/ Pitt CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1639 turned disdainfully away. " Mr. Pitt docs everything," wrote Sec. i ILLIAM Pitt Horace Walpole, ''and the Duke gives everything. So long as thc}^ "^^' 1742 To 1762 WILLIAM ITn, I'AV.MASTLR OF HIE fOKCKS. PictiiTC by Hoarc. agree in this partition they may do what they plca.sc." Out of the union of these two strangely-contrasted leaders, in fact, rose the greatest, as it was the last, of the purely Whig administrations. lUit 1640 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. I its real power la\- from bcgintiini;" to end in Pitt himself. Poor as he \ViLLi.\M was, for his income was little more than two hundred a year, and p,,.^ .... 1742 springing as he did from a family of no political importance, it was 1762 by sheer dint of genius that the young cornet of horse, at whose youth and inexperience Walpole had sneered, seized a power which the Whig houses had ever since the Revolution kept jealously in their grasp. His ambition had no petty aim. " I want to call England," he said as he took office, " out of that enervate state in which twenty thousand men from France can shake her." His call was soon answered. He at once breathed his own lofty spirit into the country he served, as he communicated something of his own grandeur to the men who served him. " No man," said a soldier of the time, "ever entered Mr. Pitt's closet who did not feel himself braver when he came out than when he went in." Ill-combined as were his earlier expeditions, many as were his failures, he roused a temper in the nation at large which made ultimate defeat im- possible. " England has been a long time in labour," exclaimed Frederick of Prussia as he recognized a greatness like his own, " but she has at last brought forth a man." Pitt and It is this personal and solitary grandeur which strikes us most ^^ as we look back to William Pitt. The tone of his speech and action stands out in utter contrast with the tone of his time. In the midst of a society critical, polite, indifferent, simple even to the affectation of simplicity, witty and amusing but absolutely prosaic, cool of heart and of head, sceptical of virtue and enthusiasm, scep- tical above all of itself, Pitt stood absolutely alone. The depth of his conviction, his passionate love for all that he deemed lofty and true, his fiery energy, his poetic imaginativeness, his theatrical airs and rhetoric, his haughty self-assumption, his pompousness and extravagance, were not more puzzling to his contemporaries than the confidence with which he appealed to the higher sentiments of mankind, the scorn with which he turned from a corruption which had till then been the great engine of politics, the undoubting faith which he felt in himself, in the grandeur of his aims, and in his power to carry them out. " I know that I can save the country," he said to the Duke of Devonshire on his entry into the Ministry, '• and I know no other man can." The groundwork of Pitt's character was an intense and passionate pride ; but it was a pride MODERN ENGLAND 1641 SWORD-BEARER OF LONDON. Map, 1726. which kept him from stooping to the level of the men who had so long held England in their hands. He was the first statesman since the Restoration who set the example of a purely public spirit. Keen as was his love of power, no man ever refused office so often, or accepted it with so strict a regard to the prin- ciples he professed. " I will not go to Court," he replied to an offer which was made him, "if I may not bring the constitution with me." For the corruption about him he had nothing but disdain. He left to New- castle the buying of seats and the purchase of members. At the outset of his career Pelham appointed him to the most lucrative office in his administration, that of Paymaster of the Forces ; but its profits were of an illicit kind, and poor as he was Pitt refused to accept one farthing beyond his salary. His pride never appeared in loftier and nobler form than in his attitude to- wards the people at large. No leader had ever a wider popularity than " the great commoner,"' as Pitt was styled, but his air was always that of a man who commands popularity, not that of one who seeks it. He never bent to flatter popular preju- dice. When mobs were roaring thcm- .selvcs hoarse for " Wilkes and liberty," he denounced Wilkes as a worthless profligate ; and when all luigland went mad in its hatred of the Scots Pitt haughtily declared his esteem for a people whose courage he had been the fir.st to enlist on the side of lo\-alt\-. His noble figure, Sec. 1 William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 His public spirit MACE-llEAKEK UK LU.NUON. MaJ>, 1726. CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1643 the hawk-like eye which flashed from the small thin face, his majestic voice, the fire and grandeur of his eloquence gave him a sway over the House of Commons far greater than any other minister nas possessed. He could silence an opponent with a look of scorn, or hush the whole House with a single word. But he never stooped to the arts by which men form a political party, and at the height of his power his personal following hardly numbered half a dozen members. His real strength indeed lay not in Parliament but in the jx:ople at large. His significant title of " the great commoner" marks a TOWN-HALL, CARLISLE, IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. Nutter, "Carlisle iti the Olden Thiic." political revolution. " It is the people who have sent me here,"' Pitt boasted with a haughty pride when the nobles of the Cabinet opposed his will. He was the first to .see that the long pohtical inactivity of the public mind had cea.scd, and that the progress of commerce and industry had produced a great mickUc class, which no longer found its representatives in the legislature. " NOu have taught me," said George the Second wlicn Pitt sought to sa\c H\'ng by appcah'ng to the scnliinciit u{ I'.uliamcnt, " to lool< (or llu; voice Sec. I William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 The Great Com- moner i644 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. I of my people in other places than within the House of Commons." wiLLi.^.M It was this unrepresented class which had forced him into i)ower. Pitt ^ ^ 1742 During his struggle with Newcastle the greater towns backed him TO 1762 with the gift of their freedom and addresses of confidence. 'For weeks." laughs Horace Walpole, '• it rained gold boxes." London stood b\' him through good report and evil report, and the wealthiest of English merchants, Alderman Beckford, was proud to figure as His popu- \^.^^ political lieutenant. The temper of Pitt indeed harmonized larity admirably with the temper of the commercial England which rallied round him, with its energy, its self-confidence, its pride, its patriotism, its honesty, its moral earnestness. The merchant and the trader were drawn by a natural attraction to the one statesman of their time whose aims were unselfish, whose hands were clean, whose life was pure and full of tender affection for wife and child. But there was a far deeper ground for their enthusiastic reverence and for the reverence v/hich his country has borne Pitt ever since. He loved England with an intense and personal love. He believed in her power, her glor}', her public virtue, till England learned to believe in herself. Her triumphs were his triumphs, her defeats his defeats. Her dangers lifted him high above all thought of self or party-spirit. " Be one people," he cried to the factions who rose to bring about his fall : " forget everything but the public ! I set you the e.xample !" His glowing patriotism was the real spell by which he held England. But even the faults which chequered his character told for him with the middle classes. The Whig statesmen who preceded him had been men whose pride expressed itself in a marked simplicity and absence of pretence. Pitt was essentially an actor, dramatic in the cabinet, in the House, in his very office. He transacted business with his clerks in full dress. His letters to his family, genuine as his love for them was, are stilted and unnatural in tone. It was easy for the wits of his day to jest at his affectation, his pompous gait, the dramatic appearance which he made on great debates with his limbs swathed in flannel and his crutch by his side. Early in life Walpole sneered at him for bringing into the House of Commons " the gestures and emotions of the stage. ' But the classes to whom Pitt appealed were classes not easily offended by faults of taste, and saw nothing to laugh at in the statesman who was borne into the lobby amidst MODERN ENGLAND 1645 the tortures of the gout, or carried into the House of Lords to breathe his last in a protest against national dishonour. Above all Pitt wielded the strength of a resistless eloquence. The power of political speech had been revealed in the stormy WILLIAM rriT, EARL OF CHATHA.M. Portrait by Richard Brjiiipton, in possession of Earl Stanhope, at Chcvcninf;. debates of the Long Parliament, but it was cramped in its utterance by the legal and theological pedantry of the time. Pedantry was flung off by the age of the Revolution, but in the eloquence of Somers and his ri\als wc sec ability rather than genius, knowledge, clearness of expression, precisirm of tliought, ilic lucidity William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 Pitt's Elo- quence 1646 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. I William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 His stafes- manship of the pleader or the man of business, rather than the passion of the orator. Of this clearness of statement Pitt had little or none. He was no read}- debater like W'alpole, no speaker of set speeches like Chesterfield. His set speeches were always his worst, for in these his want of taste, his love of effect, his trite quotations and extravagant metaphors came at once to the front. That with defects like these he stood far above every orator of his time was due above all to his profound conviction, to the earnestness and sincerity with which he spoke. " I must sit still," he whispered once to a friend, " for when once I am up cvcrj-thing that is in m}' mind comes out." But the reality of his eloquence was transfigured by a large and poetic imagination, and by a glow of passion which not onh' raised him high above the men of his own day but set him in rhc front rank among the orators of the world. The cool reasoning, the wit, the common sense of his age made way for a splendid audacity, a sympathy with popular emotion, a sustained grandeur, a lofty vehemence, a command over the whole range of human feeling. He passed without an effort from the most solemn appeal to the gayest raillery, from the keenest sarcasm to the tenderest pathos. Every word was driven home by the grand self-conscious- ness of the speaker. He spoke always as one having authority. He was in fact the first English orator whose words were a power, a power not over Parliament only but over the nation at large. Parliamentary reporting was as yet unknown, and it was only in detached phrases and half-remembered outbursts that the voice of Pitt reached beyond the walls of St. Stephen's. But it was especially in these sudden outbursts of inspiration, in these brief passionate appeals, that the power of his eloquence la}-. The few broken words we have of him stir the same thrill in men of our da\- which they stirred in the men of his own. But passionate as was Pitt's eloquence, it was the eloquence of a statesman, not of a rhetorician. Time has approved almost all his greater struggles, his defence of the libert}- of the subject against arbitrary imprison- ment under " general warrants," of the liberty of the press against Lord Mansfield, of the rights of constituencies against the House of Commons, of the constitutional rights of America against P^ngland itself. His foreign policy was directed to the preservation of Prussia, and Prussia has vindicated his foresight b}' the creation of MODERN ENGLAND 1647 chant's clerk made a com- pany of English traders the sovereigns of Bengal, and opened that wondrous career of conquest which has added the Indian peninsula, from Ceylon to the Hima- layas, to the dominion of the British crown. Recalled by broken health to England, Clive returned at the out- break of the Seven Years' War to win for England a greater prize than that whicli his victories had won for it in the supremacy of the Car- natic. He had been only a few months at Madras when a crime whose horror still lingers in English memories called him to Bengal. Bengal, the delta of the Ganges, was the richest and most fertile of all the provinces of India. Its rice, its sugar, its silk, and the produce of its looms, were famous in Vauo- pean markets. Its viceroys, like their fellow lieutenants, liad become practically independent of the Emperor, and had .idiKd u> Heuiial the provinces of Orissa and l>char. SU RAJAH DOWLAH. Miniature in India Musctiiii. Sec. I William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 Germany. We have adopted his plans for the direct government of India by the Crown, which when he proposed them were re- garded as insane. Pitt was the first to recognize the liberal charac- ter of the Church of England. He was the first to sound the note of Parliamentary reform. One of his earliest measures shows the generosity and originality of his mind. He quieted Scotland by employing its Jacobites in the service of their country, and by raising Highland regiments among its clans. The selection of Wolfe and Amherst as generals showed his contempt for pre- cedent and his inborn knowledge of men. But it was fortune rather than his genius which showered on Pitt the triumphs which signalized the opening of his ministry. In the East the darine of a mer- Plassey :i(l(U-(l Suraiah Dowlaii, the master 1648 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. 1 William Pitt T742 TO 1762 Black Hole of Calcutta of this vast domain, had long been jealous of the enterprise and wealth of the English traders ; and, roused at this moment by the instigation of the French, he appeared before Fort William, seized its settlers, and thrust a hundred and fifty of them into a small prison called the Black Mole of Calcutta. The heat of an Indian summer did its work of death. The wretched prisoners trampled each other under foot in the madness of thirst, and in the morning onl}- twenty-three remained alive. Clivc sailed at the news with a thousand Englishmen and two thousand sepo)'s to wreak vengeance for the crime. He was no longer the boy-soldier of Arcot ; and the tact and skill with which he met Surajah Dowlah in the negotiations by which the Viceroy strove to avert a conflict were sullied by the Oriental falsehood and treachery to which he stooped. MEDAI, COMMEMORATING BATTLE OF PLASSEV. But his courage remained unbroken. When the two armies faced each other on the plain of Plassey the odds were so great that on the very eve of the battle a council of war counselled retreat. Clive withdrew to a grove hard by, and after an hour's lonely musing gave the word to fight. Courage, in fact, was all that was needed. The fifty thousand foot and fourteen thousand horse who were seen covering the plain at daybreak on the 23rd of June, 1757, were soon thrown into confusion by the English guns, and broke in headlong rout before the Engli.sh charge. The death of Surajah Dowlah enabled the Company to place a creature of its own on the throne of Bengal ; but his rule soon became a nominal one. With the victory of Plassey began in fact the Empire of England in the East. MODERN ENGLAND [649 William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 Pitt and Frederick The year of Piassey was the year of a victory hardly less im- portant in the West. There was little indeed in the military ex- peditions which marked the opening of Pitt's ministry to justify the trust of his country ; for money and blood were lavished on buccaneering descents upon the French coasts which did small damage to the enem}-. But incidents such as these had little weight in the minister's general policy. His greatness lies in the fact that he recognized the genius of Frederick the Great, and resolved to give him an energetic support. On his entry into office he refused to ratify the Convention of Closter-Seven, which had reduced Frederick to despair by throwing open his realm to a French advance ; protected his flank by gathering an English and Hanoverian force on the Elbe, and on the counsel of the Prussian King placed the best of his generals, the Prince of Brunswick, at its head ; while subsidy MEDALS COMMEMORATING UATTLES OF ROSSBACH AND LEUTHEN. after subsidy were poured into Frederick's exhaust- ed treasury. Pitt's trust was met by the most bril- liant display of military genius which the modern world had as yet witness- ed. Two months after his repulse at Kolin, Frede- rick flung himself on a French army which had advanced into the heart of Germany, and annihilated it in the victory of Rossbach. Before another month had passed he hurried from the Saale to the Oder, and by a yet more signal victory at Leuthen cleared Silesia of the Austrians. The victory of Rossbach was destined to change the fortunes of the world by bringing about the unity of German)- ; its immediate effect was to force the French arm}' on the Elbe to fall back on the Rhine. Here Ferdinand of Brunswick, reinforced with twenty thousand English soldiers, held them at ba}- during the summer, while Frederick, foiled in an attack on Moravia, drove the Russians back on Poland in the battle of Zorndorf His defeat however by the Austrian General Daun at Hochkirch proved the first of a .scries of terrible misfortunes; and the )-car 1759 mark.s the lowest point of his fortunes. A ficsh advance of the Russian Rossbach iXov. 1757 i6sO HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. sec^i army forced the King to attack it at Kunersdorf in August, and ^i,';^'^" Frederick's repulse ended in the utter rout of his army. For the 1742 moment all seemed lost, for even Berlin la>' open to the conqueror. 1762 A few days later the surrender of Dresden gave Saxony to the Austrians ; and at the close of the year an attempt upon them at Plaucn was foiled with terrible loss. But every disaster was retrieved by the indomitable courage and tenacity of the King, and winter found him as before master of Silesia and of all Saxony save the ground which Daun's camp covered. The year which marked the lowest point of I^'cderick's fortunes was the year of Pitt's greatest triumphs, the year of Mindcn and Quibcron and Quebec. France aimed both at a descent upon Fngland and at MEDAL COMMEMORATING BATTLE OF MINDEN. Minden Aug. \, 1759 the conquest of Hanover, and gathered a naval armament at Brest, while fifty thousand men under Contadcs and Broglic united on the Weser. Ferdinand with less than forty thousand met them on the field of Minden. The French marched along the Weser to the attack, with their flanks protected by that river and a brook which ran into it, and with their cavalry, ten thousand strong, massed in the centre. The six English regiments in Ferdinand's army fronted the French horse, and, mistaking their general's order, marched at once upon them in line, regardless of the batteries on their flank, and rolled back charge after charge with volleys of musketry. In an hour the French centre was utterly broken. " I have seen," said Contadcs, " what I never thought to be possible — a single line of infantry break through three lines of cavalry, ranked in order of battle, and tumble them to ruin ! " Nothing but the refusal of Lord John Sackville to complete the victory by a charge of the MODERN ENGLAND i6si horse which he headed saved the French from utter rout. As it was, their army again fell back broken on Frankfort and the Rhine. The project of an invasion of England met with like success. Eighteen thousand men lay ready to embark on board the French fleet, when Admiral Hawke came in sight of it at the mouth of Ouiberon Ba}-. The sea was rolling high, and the coast where the French ships lay was so dangerous from its shoals and granite reefs that the pilot remonstrated with the English admiral against his project of attack. " You have done your duty in this remonstrance," Hawke coolh- replied ; " now lay me alongside the French admiral." Two English ships were lost on the shoals, but Sec. I N\"lI.l.I.\M Pitt 1742 TO 1762 Out heron Xov. 20 "A VIl.W UF UIK CITV OK QLKBIX IX NKW FK.l.NCli I.\ A.MKR1C.'\." Drawin,^ {in British Miiseuiii) hy Marga?'ct Cecil, 1740. the French fleet \\as ruined and the disgrace of B}-ng's retreat \\iped awa)\ It was not in the Old World onl\- that the }car of Minden ami The Quiberon brought glory to the arms of England. In Europe, Pill Conquest had wisely limited his efforts to the supjjort of Prussia, but across Canada the Atlantic the field was wholl)' his own, and he had no sooner entered office than the desultory raids, which had hitherto been the only resistance to PVcnch aggression, were superseded b\- a large and comprehensive ])lan of attack. The .sympathies of llic colonics were won by an order which gave their provincial ofticcrs equal rank with the royal officers in the field. They raised at \'oi.. IV — I'Airi 36 i; ( > [6^2 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. I William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 I75S Pitt's call twenty thousand men, and taxed themselves heavily for their support. Three expeditions were simultaneously directed against the I-'rcnch line— one to the Ohio vallc}-, one against Ticonderoga on Lake Champlain, while a third under General Amherst and Admiral Boscawen sailed to the mouth of the St. Lawrence. The last was brilliantly successful. Louisburg, though defended by a garrison of five thousand men, was taken with the fleet in its harbour, and the whole province of Cape Breton reduced. The American militia supported the British troops in a vigorous campaign against the forts ; and though Montcalm, with a far inferior force, was able to repulse General Abercromby from Ticonderoga, a force from Philadelphia and Virginia, guided and inspired by the courage of George Washington, made itself ma.ster MED.\L COMMEMORATING CAPTURE OF LOUISBUKG A.ND CAPE BRETON. 1759 Wol/c of Duquesne. The name of Pittsburg which was given to their new conquest still commemorates the enthusiasm of the colonists for the great Minister who first opened to them the West. The next year saw the evacuation of Ticonderoga before the advance of Amherst, and the capture of Fort Niagara after the defeat of an Indian force which marched to its relief. The capture of the three forts was the close of the French effort to bar the advance of the colonists to the valley of the Mississippi, and to place in other than English hands the destinies of North America. But Pitt had resolved, not merely to foil the ambition of Montcalm, but to destroy the French rule in America altogether; and while Amherst was breaking through the line of forts, an expedition under General Wolfe entered the St. Lawrence and anchored below Quebec. Wolfe had already fought at Dettingen, Fonteno}-, and MODERN ENGLAND 1653 Laffeldt, and had played the first part in the capture of Louisburc:^. Sec. 1 Pitt had discerned the genius and heroism which lav hidden be- ^villiam Pitt neath the awkward manner and the occasional gasconade of the 1742 young soldier of thirt}--three whom he chose for the crowning 1762 exploit of the war, but for a while his sagacity seemed to have failed. No efforts could draw Montcalm from the long line of CKXKRAL WOLFK. Picture by Schaa/c, in Xational Portrait Gallery. inaccessible cliffs which at this point borders the ri\er, and for six weeks Wolfe saw his men wasting away in inacti\il\- while he himself la\' prostrate with sickness and {lcsi)air. At last his resolu- tion was fixed, and in a long line of boats the ami}- dropped down the St. Lawrence to a pc^int at the base of the I feights of Abraham, where a narrow path had been disctA'cred to the summit. Not a voice broke the silence of the night save the voice of Wollr him CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1655 self, as he quietly repeated the stanzas of Gray's " Elegy in a Country Churchyard," remarking as he closed, " I had rather be the author of that poem than take Quebec." But his nature was as brave as it was tender; he was the first to leap on shore and to scale the narrow path where no two men could go abreast. His men followed, pulling themselves to the top by the help of bushes and the crags, and at daybreak on the 12th of September the whole army stood in orderly formation before Quebec. Montcalm hastened to attack, though his force, composed chiefly of raw militia, was far inferior in discipline to the English ; his onset however was met by a steady fire, and at the fii-st English advance his men gave way. Wolfe headed a charge which broke the French line, but a ball pierced his breast in the moment of victory. " They run," cried an officer who held the dying man in his arms — " I protest the}' run." Wolfe rallied to ask who they were that ran, and was told "The French." "Then," he murmured, "I die happy ! " The fall of Montcalm in the moment of his defeat completed the victory ; and the submission of Canada, on the capture of Alontrcal by Amherst in 1760, put an end to the dream of a French empire in America. Sec. 1 William Pitt 1742 TO 1762 Quebec MEDAL COMMICMOKATl.NC. SUCCESSES '^1 l /_-,>. ill ii'.^v^(|^![«| CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1657 Sec. II NORTH AMERICAN TRADERS AND INDIANS. Ganthier and Fadeii's Map of Canada, 1777. Section II. — The Independence of America, 1761 — 1782 \Authoritics. — The two sides of the American quarrel ha\'e been told with the same purpose of fairness and truthfulness, though with a very different bias, by Lord Stanhope (" History of England from the Peace of Utrecht "), and Mr. Bancroft ("History of the United States"). The latter is by far the more detailed and picturesque, the former perhaps the cooler and more impartial of the two narratives. For England see Mr. iMasscys " History of England from the Accession of George the Third ; '' Walpole's '• Memoir's of the Early Reign of George the Third ; "' the Rockingham Memoirs ; the Grenvillc Papers ; the Bedford Correspondence ; the correspondence of George the Third with Lord North ; the Letters of Junius ; and Lord Russell's " Life and Correspondence of C. J. Fox." Burke's speeches and pamphlets during this period, above all his " Thoughts on the Causes of the Present Discontents," are indispensable for any real knowledge of it. The Constitutional History of Sir Erskine May all but compensates us, in its fulness and impartiality, for the loss of Mr. Hallam's comments.] [Mr. Lecky's " History of England in the Eighteenth Century" has been published since this book was written.- /:">//«/« when a consciousness of the destinies that lay before the luiglish ^"//yi/^;. pcoplc showed itself in the restlessness with which our seamen penetrated into far-off seas. The Atlantic was dwindling into a mere strait within the British pjiipirc ; but bexond it to the west- ward lay a reach of waters where the British flag was almost unknown. In the year which followed the Peace of I'aris two ,-(-,4 English ships were sent on a cruise of disctwery to tin- .Straits of i66o HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Secji Magellan ; three years later Captain Wall is reached the coral reefs Thk inde- of Tahiti ; and in 1768 Captain Cook traversed the Pacific from end 01- America ^.q ^j^^-j ^j^j whercv^cr hc touchcd, in New Zealand, in Australia, he 1761 ' T'^ claimed the soil for the Knc:lish Crown, and opened a new world 17S2 ^^ '^ — for the expansion of the English race. Statesmen and people CAPTAIN COOK. Fro)>: an cngrazhig- ly Shcnvin, nftcr a picture ly N. Dance. alike felt the change in their country's attitude. In the words of Burke, the Parliament of Britain claimed " an imperial character in which as from the throne of heaven she superintends all the several inferior legislatures, and guides and controls them all, without annihilating any." Its people, steeped in the commercial ideas of the time, saw in the growth of their vast possessions, the monopoh' MODERN ENGLAND 1661 of whose trade was reserved to the mother countr}-, a source of boundless wealth. The trade with America alone w^as in 1772 nearl)' equal to what England carried on with the whole world at the beginning of the centur}-. To guard and preserve so vast and lucrative a dominion became from this moment not only the aim of British statesmen but the resolv^e of the British people. From the time when the Puritan emigration added the four New England States, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island to those of Maryland and Virginia the pro- gress of the English colonies in North America had been slow, but it had never ceased. Settlers still came, though in smaller numbers, and two new colonies south of Virginia re- ceived from Charles the Second their name of the Caro- linas. The war with Holland transferred to British rule a district claimed by the Dutch from the Hudson to the inner Lakes ; and this countr}-, which was granted by Charles to his brother, received from him the name of New York. Portions were soon broken off from its vast territory to form the colonies of New Jersey and Delaware. In 16S2 a train of Quakers followed William I'enn across the Delaware into tlu- heart of the primaeval forest, and became a colon)- whicli recalled its founder and the woodlands amf)ng which lu- planted it in its name of Pennsylvania. A long interxal elapsed before a new settlement, \,. i'i'.N Portrait in National Mii. Sec. II The Inde- pe.ndence OF America 1761 TO 1782 The American Colonies 1664 i66. HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CH/. p. Sec. II which rcccivcd its title of Georgia from the reigning sovereign, The iNDK- Georee the Second, was established by General Oglethorpe on the I'ENDENCE ° ofAmekra Savannah as a refuge for linglish debtors and for the persecuted '^^ Protestants of Germany. Slow as this progress seemed, the colonics were really growing fast in numbers and in wealth. Their progress wholc population amounted in the middle of the eighteenth century PINE-TREE SHILLING OF .MASSACII USETrS. to about 1,200,000 whites and a quarter of a million of negroes ; nearly a fourth of that of the mother country. The wealth of the colonists was growing even faster than their numbers. As yet the southern colonies were the more productive. Virginia boasted of its tobacco plantations, Georgia and the Carolinas of their maize and rice and indigo crops, while New York and Pennsylvania, with the colonies of New England, were restricted to their whale and cod fisheries, their corn harvests and their timber trade. The distinction indeed between the Northern and Southern colonies :,L\\ AM.1 1 LkIvAM ( A1 1 l.KUAUD.S .\ LU VuKK). JV. J. Visscher's Map of .\'e~M England and Xc-zu Belgium. Mid. Scvetiteenth Century. was more than an industrial one. In the Southern States the prevalence of slavery produced an aristocratic spirit and favoured the creation of large estates ; even the system of entails had been introduced among the wealthy planters of Virginia, where many of the older English families found representatives in houses such as MODERN ENGLAND 1663 those of Fairfax and Washington. Throughout New England, on sec. ii the other hand, the characteristics of the Puritans, their piety, their '^'he Inde- '■ I'ENDENCK intolerance, their simplicity of life, their love of equality and °^ America tendency to democratic institutions, remained unchanged. In education and political activity New England stood far ahead of its fellow colonies, for the settlement of the Puritans had been followed at once by the establishment of a system of local schools which is still the glory of America. '' Every township," it was 1782 " A PROSPECT OK THE COLLEDGES AT CAMBRIDGE IN NEW ENGLAND. American print, c. 1739. enacted, " after the Lord hath increased them to the number of fifty householders, shall appoint one to teach all children to write and read ; and when any town shall increase to the number of a hundred families, they shall .set up a grammar school." Great however as these differences were, and great as was to be Englami their innuence. on American history, they were little felt as yet. colonies Li the main features fjf their outer organization the whole ot tin- colonies stood fairK- at (jne. In relicricnis and in ci\il mailers i664 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap Sec. II alike all of them contrasted sharply with the England at home. The"7^de- Religious tolerance had been brought about by a medley of PENDENCE ,111 1 r -VT OF America rcligious faiths such as the world had never seen betore. JNew '?o^ England was still a Puritan stronghold. In all the Southern ^U colonies the Episcopal Church was established by law, and the bulk of the settlers clung to it ; but Roman Catholics formed a large part of the population of i\Lar\-land. Pennsylvania was a State of Quakers. Presbyterians and Baptists had fled from tests and persecutions to colonise New Jersey. Lutherans and Mora- vians from Germany abounded among the settlers of Carolina and Georgia. In such a chaos of creeds religious persecution became impossible. There was the same outer diversity and the same real unity in the political tendency and organization of the States. Whether the spirit of the colony was democratic, moderate, or oligarchical, its form of government was prctt\- much the same. The original rights of the proprietor, the projector and grantee of the earliest settlement, had in all cases, save in those of Pennsyl- vania and Maryland, either ceased to exist or fallen into desuetude. The government of each colony lay in a House of Assembly elected by the people at large, with a Council sometimes elected, sometimes nominated by the Governor, and a Governor either elected or appointed by the Crown. With the appointment of these Governors all administrative interference on the part of the English Government at home practically ended. The colonies were left by control a happy neglect to themselves. It was wittily said at a later day that " Mr. Grenville lost America because he read the American despatches, which none of his predecessors ever did." There was little room indeed for any interference within the limits of the colonies. Their privileges were secured by ro\-al charters. Their Assemblies alone exercised the right of internal taxation, and they exercised it sparingly. Walpole, like Pitt afterwards, set roughly aside the project for an American excise. " I have Old England set against me," he said, " by this measure, and do you think I will have New England too.'" Even in matters of trade the supremacy of the mother country was far from being a galling one. There were some small import duties, but they were evaded by a well-understood system of smuggling. The restriction of trade with the colonies to Great Britain was more than compen- MODERN ENGLAND 166 = sated by the commercial privileges which the Americans enjoyed Sec. ii as British subjects. As vet, therefore, there was nothincr to break '^"e Inde- the good will which the colonists felt towards the mother country, °'' amekica while the danger of French aggression drew them closely to it. to But strong as the attachment of the Americans to Britain seemed — at the close of the war, keen lookers-on saw in the very complete- ness of Pitt's triumph a danger to their future union. The presence of the French in Canada, their designs in the west, had thrown America for protection on the mother-countr}\ But with the conquest of Canada all need of this protection was removed. The attitude of England towards its distant dependency became one of mere possession : and differences of temper, which had till now been thrown into the background by the higher need for union, started into a new prominence. If questions of trade and taxation awoke murmurings and disputes, behind these grievances lay an uneasy dread at the democratic form which the government and society of the colonies had taken, and at the " levelling principles " which prevailed. To check this republican spirit, to crush all dreams of sever- George the ance, and to strengthen the unity of the British Empire was one Third of the chief aims of the young sovereign who mounted the throne on the death of his grandfather in 1760. For the first and last time since the accession of the House of Hanover England saw a King who was resolved to play a part in English politics ; and the part which George the Third succeeded in playing was undoubtedly a memorable one. In ten years he reduced government to a shadow, and turned the loyalty of his subjects at home into dis- affection. In twenty he had forced the American colonies into revolt and independence, and brought England to what then seemed the brink of ruin. Work such as this has sometimes been done by very great men, and often by very wicked and profligate men ; but George was neither profligate nor great. He had a smaller mind than any English king before him save James the Second. He was wretchedly educated, and his natural powers were of the meanest sort. Nor had he the capacity fcjr using greater minds than his own b)- which some sovereigns have concealed their natural littleness. On the coiitrar\', his only feeling towards great men was one of jcaUnis)- and IiaU-. lie .l||f**M^^ GEORGE III. Picture by Allan Ramsay (1767), in the Xational Portyait Gallery. CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1667 longed for the time when " decrepitude or death " might put an end to Pitt ; and even when death had freed him from " this trumpet of sedition," he denounced the proposal for a public monu- ment to the great statesman as " an offensive measure to me personally." But dull and petty as his temper was, he was clear as to his purpose and obstinate in the pursuit of it. And his purpose was to rule. " George," his mother, the Princess of Wales, had continually repeated to him in youth, " George, be king." He called himself always " a Whig of the Revolution," Sec. II The Inde- pendence OF America 1 761 TO 1782 .^^^' £ STATE COACH OF GEORGE III. South Kensington Jl/uscitiii. and he had no wish to undo the work which he believed the Revo- lution to have done. But he looked on the subjection of his two predecessors to the will of their ministers as no real part of the work of the Revolution, but as a usurpation of that authority which the Revolution had left to the Crown. And to this usurpa- tion he was determined not to submit. His resolve was to govern, not to govern against law, but simply to govern, to be freed from the dictation of parties and ministers, and to be in effect the first Minister of the State. How utterly incompatible such a dix-am was with the Parliamentary constitution of the countr\- as il liad Vol.. IV— Pakt 36 5 1' A'r/uni of till- Torit-s i668 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. ii received its final form from Sunderland it is easy to see ; but The inde- Gcorgc was resolved to carry out his dream. And in carrying it PENDENXE ° ^ o OF ..vmerica QUI; j^g ^y^s aided by the circumstances of the time. The spell of 1761 f TO Tacobitism was broken by the defeat of Charles Edward, and the 1782 — later degradation of his life wore finally away the thin coating of disloyalty which clung to the clergy and the squires. They were ready again to take part in politics, and in the accession of a king who, unlike his two predecessors, was no stranger but an English- man, who had been born in England and spoke English, they found the opportunity they desired. From the opening of the reign Tories gradually appeared again at court. It was only slowly indeed that the party as a whole swung round to a steady support of the Government ; but their action told at once on the complexion of English politics. Their withdrawal from public affairs had left them untouched by the progress of political ideas since the Revolution of 1688, and when they returned to political life it was to invest the new sovereign with all the reverence which they had bestowed on the Stuarts. A " King's party " was thus ready made to his hand ; but George was able to strengthen it by a vigorous exertion of the power and influence which was still left The to the Crown. All promotion in the Church, all advancement in King's Friends the army, a great number of places in the civil administration and about the court, were still at the King's disposal. If this vast mass of patronage had been practically usurped by the ministers of his predecessors, it was resumed and firmly held by George the Third ; and the character of the House of Commons made patron- age, as we have seen, a powerful engine in its management. George had one of Walpole's weapons in his hands, and he used it with unscrupulous energy to break up the party which Walpole had held so long together. He saw that the Whigs were divided among themselves by the factious spirit which springs from a long hold of office, and that they were weakened by the rising con- tempt with which the country at large regarded the selfishness and corruption of its representatives. More than thirty years before, Gay had set the leading statesmen of the day on the public stage under the guise of highwaymen and pickpockets. "It is difficult to determine," said the witty playwright, " whether the fine gentle- men imitate the gentlemen of the road, or the gentlemen of the iMODERN ENGLAND 1669 OF America will was to end the war. In the spring of 1762 Frederick, who still 1761 . 1 & / TO held his ground stubbornK' against fate, was brought to the brink 1782 . ^ . ',.... — of ruin by a withdrawal of the Fnglish subsidies ; it was in fact onl)' Bllt€*S Ministry his dogged resolution and a sudden change in the policy of Russia, which followed on the death of his enemy the Czarina Flizabeth, that enabled him at last to retire from the struggle in the Treaty of Hubertsberg without the loss of an inch of territory. George and Lord Bute had already purchased peace at a very different price. With a shameless indifference to the national honour they not only deserted Frederick, but they offered to negotiate a peace for him on the basis of a cession of Silesia to Maria Theresa and East Prussia to the Czarina. The issue of the strife with Spain saved England from humiliation such as this. Pitt's policy of instant attack had been justified by a Spanish declaration of war three weeks after his fall ; and the year 1762 saw triumphs which vindicated his confidence in the issue of the new struggle. Martinico, the strongest and wealthiest of the French West Indian possessions, was conquered at the opening of the year, and its conquest was followed by those of Grenada, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent. In the summer the reduction of Havana brought with it the gain of the rich Spanish colony of Cuba. The Philippines, the wealthiest of the Spanish colonies in the Pacific, yielded to a Peace of British fleet. It was these losses that brought about the Peace of arts Paris. So eager was Bute to end the war that he contented him- Feb. 1763 _ ^ self in Europe with the recovery of Minorca, while he restored IMartinico to France, and Cuba and the Philippines to Spain. The real gains of Britain were in India and America. In the first the French abandoned all right to any military settlement. From the second the}' wholl}- withdrew. To England they gave up Canada, Nova Scotia, and Louisiana as far as the Mississippi, while they resigned the rest of that province to Spain, in compensation for its surrender of Florida to the British Crown. The The anxict}' which the \-oung King showed for peace abroad Con^nfons ^P^ang miainh' from his belief that peace was needful for success in the struggle for power at home. So long as the war lasted Pitt's return to office and the union of the Whigs under his guidance was MODERN ENGLAND 1673 an hourly danger. But with peace the King's hands were free. Sec. ii He could count on the dissensions of the Whigs, on the new-born the inde- ^ , ^T-, . PENDENCE loyalt}' of the Tories, on the influence of the Crown patronage °^ America which he had taken into his own hands. But what he counted on most of all was the character of the House of Commons. At a time when it had become all-powerful in the State, the House of Commons had ceased in any real and effective sense to be a repre- sentative body at all. That changes in the distribution of seats 1761 TO 1782 THE MANSION HOUSE, LONDON. Picture by S. Scott, c. 1750. Guildhall Art Gallery. were called for by the natural shiftings of population and wealth since the days of Edward the First had been recognized as early as the Civil Wars ; but the reforms of the Long Parliament were cancelled at the Restoration. l^'rom the time of Charles the Second to that of George the Third not a single effort had been made to meet the growing abuses of our parliamentar\- s\stcm. Great towns like Manchester or liirmingham remained without a member, while members still sat for borouijhs which, like ( )l(i Sarum, had actually vanished fr(;iii the face of the eailh. I he i674 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. II effort of thc Tudor sovereigns to establish a Court party in the The Indf. House bv a profuse creation of borouG;hs, most of which were mere PENDENCK J r .-> ' OF America 1761 TO 1782 villages then in thc hands of thc Crown, had ended in thc appro- priation of these seats by the neighbouring landowners, who bought and sold them as they bought and sold their own estates. Even in towns which had a real claim to representation, the narrowing of municipal pri\ilegcs ever since thc fourteenth ccntur\- to a small part of the inhabitants, and in many cases the restriction of electoral rights to the members of the governing corporation, rendered their representation a mere name. The choice of such places hung simply on the purse or influence of politicians. Some l,i.>Mii_>.\ liKlDL.l': A.\U JjVhR S WllAi;!-. Picture by S. Scott, c. 1750. Cjiiildhall Art Gallery. were " thc King's boroughs, ' others obediently returned nominees of the Ministry of the day, others were "close boroughs" in the hands of jobbers like the Duke of Newcastle, \\\\o at one time returned a third of all the borough members in the House. The counties and the great commercial towns could alone be said to exercise any real right of suffrage, though the enormous expense of contesting such constituencies practically left their representation in the hands of the great local families. But even in the counties the suffrage was ridiculously limited and unequal. Out of a population of eight millions, only a hundred and sixty thousand were electors at all. How far such a House was from really repre- MODERN ENGLAND 1675 senting English opinion we see from the fact that in the height of his popularity Pitt could hardly find a seat in it. Purchase was becoming more and more the means of entering Parliament. Seats were bought and sold in the open market at a price which rose to four thousand pounds, and we can hardly wonder that a reformer could allege without a chance of denial, " This House is not a representative of the people of Great Britain. It is the representa- tive of nominal boroughs, of ruined and exterminated towns, of noble families, of wealthy individuals, of foreign potentates." The meanest motives naturally told on a body returned by such con- Sec. II The Inde- pendence OF America 1761 TO 1782 George and the Parlia- ment TUL lLI,Li KIVKR. Picture by S. Scott, c. 1750, Guildhall Art Gallery. stitucncies, cut off from the influence of public opinion b}- the secrecy of Parliamentary proceedings, and }-ct in\-cstcd with almost boundless authority. Walpolc and Newcastle had made briber)' and borough-jobbing the base of their power. George the Third seized it in his turn as a base of the power he proposed to give to the Crown. The royal revenue was employed to buy scats and to buy votes. Day by day George himself scrutinized the voting-list of the two Houses, and distributed rewards aiul i)unishincnts as members voted according to his will or no. Promotion in the civil service, prefcrincnt in the ("iiurcli, rank in the .iriny, was reserved for " the King's friends." Pensions and couil |)],icrs wc-rc 1676 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. II used to influence debates. Bribery was employed on a scale never The Inde- known before. Under Bute's ministry an office was opened at the PENDENCE OF America Trcasur\' for thc purcliasc of members, and twcntv-fivc thousand 1761 ^ '■ . ^ TO pounds are said to have been spent in a single day. — The result of these measures was soon seen in thc tone of thc Bute Parliament. Till now it had bowed beneath the greatness of Pitt ; but in thc teeth of his denunciation thc provisions of thc Peace of Paris were approved by a majority of five to one. " Now indeed," cried the Princess Dowager, " my son is king." But the victor)- was hardly won when King and minister found themselves battling with a storm of popular ill-will such as never since the overthrow of the Stuarts assailed the throne. Violent and reckless as it was, the storm only marked a fresh advance in the rc-awakening of public opinion. The Parliament indeed had become supreme, and in theory the Parliament was a representative of the whole English people. But in actual fact the bulk of the English people found itself powerless to control thc course of English government. For the first and last time in our history Parliament was unpopular and its opponents sure of popularity. The House of Commons was more corrupt than ever, and it was the slave of the King. The King still called himself a Whig, yet he was reviving a system of absolutism which Whiggism had long made impossible. His minister was a mere favourite, and in Englishmen's eyes a foreigner. The masses saw this, but they saw no way of mending it. They had no means of influencing the Government they hated save by sheer violence. They came therefore to the front with their old national and religious bigotry, their long-nursed dislike of the Hanoverian Court, their long-nursed habits of violence and faction, their long-nursed hatred of Parliament, but with no means of expressing them save riot and uproar. Bute found himself the object of a sudden and universal hatred ; and in 1763 he with- drew from office as a means of allaying the storm of popular indignation. But the King was made of more stubborn stuff than his minister. If he suffered his favourite to resign he still regarded him as the real head of administration ; for the ministry which Bute left behind him consisted simply of the more courtly of his George coUcagucs. Georgc Grenville was its nominal chief, but its renvi e j^g^g^res were still secreth' dictated b\- the favourite. Charles X MODERN ENGLAND 1677 Townshend and the Duke of Bedford, the two ablest of the Whigs sec. ii who had remained with Bute after Newcastle's dismissal, refused The inde- PENDEN'CE to join it ; and its one man of ability was Lord Shelburne, a young °^ America Irishman. It was in fact onh* the disunion of its opponents which to allowed it to hold its ground. Townshend and Bedford remained — apart from the main body of the Whigs, and both sections held aloof from Pitt. George had counted on the divisions of the opposition in forming such a ministr}- ; and he counted on the weakness of the ministry to make it the creature of his will. But Grenville had no mind to be a puppet either of the King or of Bute ; and the conflicts between the King and his minister soon became so bitter that George appealed in despair to Pitt to form Aug-. 1763 a ministry. Never had Pitt shown a nobler patriotism or a grander self-command than in the reception he gave to this appeal. He set aside all resentment at his own expulsion from office by Newcastle and the Whigs, and made the return to office of the whole party, with the exception of Bedford, a condition of his own. George however refused to comply with terms which would have defeated his designs. The result left Grenville as powerful as he had been weak. Bute ceased to exercise an\- political influence. On the other hand, Bedford joined Grenville with his whole party, and the ministry thus became strong and compact. Grenville's one aim was to enforce the supremacy of Parliament Quarrel over subject as over King. He therefore struck fiercely at the new Press force of opinion which had just shown its power in the fall of Bute. The opinion of the countr}- no sooner found itself unrepresented in Parliament than it sought an outlet in the Press. In spite of the removal of the censorship after the Revolution the Press had been slow to attain any political influence. Under the first two Georges its progress had been hindered by the absence of great topics for discussion, the worthlessness of the writers, and above all the lethargy of the time. It was in fact not till the accession of George the Third that the imjjulsc which Pitt h.ul gi\-cn to the national spirit, and the ri.sc of a keener interest in politics, rai.scd the Press into a political power. The nation found in it a court of appeal from the Houses of Parliament. The journals liccamc organs for that fjutburst of popular hatred whicli (lro\c Lord Hutc 1678 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec II The Inde- pendence OF America 1761 TO 1782 J oh n Wilkes Wilkes expelled from office ; and in the North Briton John Wilkes led the way by denouncing the Cabinet and the Peace with peculiar bitterness, and venturing to attack the hated minister by name. Wilkes was a worthless profligate, but he had a remarkable faculty of enlisting popular sympathy on his side, and by a singular irony of fortune he became the chief instrument in bringing about three of the greatest advances which our Constitution has ever made. He woke the nation to a conviction of the need for Parliamentary reform by his defence of the rights of constituencies against the despotism of the House of Commons. He took the lead in the struggle which put an end to the secrecy of Parliamentary proceedings. He was the first to establish the right of the Press to discuss public affairs. In his attack on the ministry of Lord Bute, however, he was simply an organ of the general discontent. It was indeed his attack which more than all else determined Bute to withdraw from office. But Grenville was of stouter stuff than the court favourite, and his administration was hardly reformed when he struck at the growing opposition to Parliament by a blow at its leader. In " Number 45 " of the North Briton Wilkes had censured the speech from the throne at the opening of Parliament, and a " general warrant " by the Secretary of State was issued against the " authors, printers, and publishers of this seditious libel." Under this warrant forty-nine persons were seized for a time ; and in spite of his privilege as a member of Parliament Wilkes himself was sent to the Tower. The arrest however was so utterly illegal that he was at once released by the Court of Common Pleas ; but he was immediately prosecuted for libel. While the paper which formed the subject for prosecution was still before the courts of justice it was condemned by the House of Commons as a '' false, scandalous, and seditious libel." The House of Lords at the same time voted a pamphlet found among Wilkes's papers to be blasphemous, and advised a prosecution. Wilkes fled to France, and was in 1764 expelled from the House of Commons. But the assumption of an arbitrary judicial power by both Houses, and the system of terror which Grenville put in force against the Press by issuing two hundred injunctions against different journals, roused a storm of indignation throughout the country. Every street resounded with cries of " Wilkes and Liberty." It was soon MODERN ENGLAND 1679 clear that opinion had been embittered rather than silenced by the Sf.c. ii blow at Wilkes ; and six ^'ears later, the failure of the prosecution the inde- ' PENDENCE directed against an anonymous journalist named "Junius" for his of America Letter to the King established the right of the Press to criticize the conduct not of ministers or Parliament only, but of the sovereign himself The same narrowness of view, the same honesty of purpose, the same obstinac}- of temper, were shown by Grenville in a yet more 1782 The Stamp Act "the city chanters"; a scene in the "wit.kes and ltrerty" riots. Frotn engraving by S. Okey, 1775, 0/ n picture by John Collett. important struggle, a struggle with the American Colonies. Titt had waged war with characteristic profusion, and he had dcfra\'cd the cost of the war by enormous loans. At the time of the Peace of Paris the public debt stood at a hundred and fort)' million-^. The first need therefore which met Bute after the conclusion of tin- Peace was that of making provision for the new burthens wliich the nation had incurred, and as these had been partl\' incurn-d in the defence of the American Colonics it was the general opinii>n ol Englishmen that the Colonics slujuld hear a shaic of tin in. In this i68o HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. II opinion Bute and the King concurred. But their plans went further The inde- than mere taxation. The new minister declared himself resolved PENDENCE OF America on a rigorous cxccution of the Navigation laws, laws by which a 1 76 1 TO monopol}- of American trade was secured to the mother-country, — on the raising of a revenue within the Colonies for the discharge of Bute and , , , ,1 n • • 1 1 • r America the debt, and above all on impressing upon the colonists a sense of their dependence upon Britain. The direct trade between America and the French or Spanish West Indian islands had hitherto been fettered by prohibitory duties, but these had been easily evaded by a general system of smuggling. The duties were now reduced, but the reduced duties were rigorously exacted, and a considerable naval force was despatched to the American coast with a view of suppressing the clandestine trade with the foreigner. The revenue which was expected from this measure was to be supplemented by an internal Stamp Tax, a tax on all legal documents issued within the Colonies. The plans of Bute had fallen to the ground on his Grc7iville's retirement from office. But Grenville had fully concurred in the ^° ^^-^ financial part at least of Bute's designs ; and, now that he found himself, at the head of a strong administration, he proceeded to carry out the plans which had been devised for the purpose of rais- ing both an external and an internal revenue from America. One of his first steps was to suppress, by a rigid enforcement of the Navigation laws, the contraband trade which had grown up be- tween American ports and the adjacent Spanish islands. Harsh and unwise as these measures seemed, the colonists owned their legality ; and their resentment only showed itself in a pledge to use no British manufactures till the restrictions were relaxed. But the next scheme of the Minister — his proposal to introduce internal taxation within the bounds of the Colonies themselves by reviving the project of an excise or stamp duty, which Walpole's good sense had rejected — was of another order from his schemes for suppress- ing the contraband traffic. Unlike the system of the Navigation Acts, it was a gigantic change in the whole actual relations of England and its Colonies. They met it therefore in another spirit. Taxation and representation, they asserted, went hand in hand. America had no representatives in the British Parliament. The representatives of the colonists met in their own colonial assemblies, and all save the Pcnnsylvanians protested strongly against the MODERN ENGLAND 1681 interference of Parliament with their right of self-taxation. Sec. ii Massachusetts marked accurately the position she took. " Prohibi- The inde- pendence tions of trade arc neither equitable nor just ; but the power of °^ America taxing is the grand barrier of British liberty. If that is once 1761 1782 broken down, all is lost." The distinction was accepted by the '— assembly of every colony ; and it was with their protest that they ^ni'ssil despatched Benjamin Franklin, who had risen from his position of 1765 BENJAMIN I'KANKMX. Meciallion by Nini, in the National Portrait Gallery. a working printer in Philadelphia to high repute among scientific discoverers, as their agent to England. In England however, Franklin found few who recognized the distinction which the colonists had drawn. Grcnvillc had no mind to change his plans without an assurance, which Franklin could not give, of a union of the Colonies to tax thcm.sclvcs ; and the Stamp Act was pas.scd through both Hou.ses with less oj^position than a turnpike bill. The Stamp Act was hardly passed when an insult ollcrt'd to ihr i682 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. II The Inde- penden'ce OF America 1761 TO 1782 The Rock- ingham Ministry Princess Dowager, by the exclusion of her name from a Regency Act, brought to a head the quarrel which had long been growing between the ministry and the King. George again offered power to William Pitt. But Pitt stood absolutely alone. The one friend who remained to him, his brother-in-law, Lord Temple, refused to aid in an attempt to construct a Cabinet ; and he felt himself too weak, when thus deserted, to hold his ground in any ministerial combination with the Whigs. The King turned for help to the main body of the Whigs, now headed by the Marquis of Rock- ingham. The weakness of the ministry which Rockingham formed in Jul}-, 1765, was seen in its slowness to deal with American affairs. Franklin had seen no other course for the Colonies, when the obnoxious Acts were passed, but that of sub- mission. But submission was the last thing the col- onists dreamed of. Every- where through New Eng- land riots broke out on the news of the arrival of the stamped paper ; and the frightened collectors re- signed their posts. North- ern and Southern States were drawn together by the new danger. The assembly of Virginia was the first to formally deny the right of the British Parliament to meddle with internal taxation, and to demand the repeal of the acts. Massachusetts not only adopted the denial and the demand as its own, but proposed a Congress of delegates from all the colonial assemblies to provide for common and united action ; and in October 1765 this Congress met to repeat the protest and petition of Virginia. The news of its assembly reached England at the end of the year, and at once called Pitt to the front when the Houses met in the spring of 1766. As a minister he had long since rejected a similar scheme for tax- ing the colonies. He had been ill and absent from Parliament when the Stamp Act was passed, but he adopted to the full the constitutional claim of America. He gloried in a resistance which was denounced in Parliament as rebellion. " In my opinion," he ^^. From Harper's Magazine.— Copyright, 1876, by Harper & Brothers. BRITISH STAMPS FOR AMERICA. MODERN ENGLAND 1683 said, " this kingdom has no right to lay a tax on the colonics. Sec. II America is obstinate ! America is almost in open rebellion ! Sir, I Tke imde- '■ ' PENDENCE OF America 1761 TO 1782 slaves would have been fit instruments to make slaves of the rest." — rejoice that America has resisted. Three millions of people so dead to all the feelings of liberty as voluntarily to submit to be EDMUND BURKE. Picture by Sir J. Reynolds in National Portrait Gallery. There was a general desire that Tilt slioukl return to fjfficc ; but Repeal the negotiations for his union witli tlie Whigs broke down. The stamp radical difference between their ])f)licy and that of I'itt was nciw in ^"^^ fact defined for them by the keenest poh'tical thinker of tin- (la\-. I'^dmund l^urke had come to London in 1 750 as a poor and un- i-\i,„,iud known h'ish adventurer. The learning which at once won him the Utirkv friendship of Johnson, and the imaginati\c ])o\\cr wliich ni.iblcd Vol, IV— Takt 36 5 o/i/i,s ^^^^ actual state of the American Colonies he saw a result of such forces which only madmen and pedants would disturb. But lUn-kc's theory was less fitted to the state of politics at home. He looked on the Revolution of i688 as the final establishment of English institutions. His aim was to keep PIngland as the Revolution had left it, and under the rule of the great nobles who were faithful to the Revolution. He gave his passionate adhesion to the inaction of the Whigs. He made an idol of Lord Rocking- ham, an honest man, but the weakest of party leaders. He strove to check the corruption of Parliament by a bill for civil retrench- ment, but he took the lead in defeating all plans for its reform. Though he was one of the i^cw men in England who understood with Pitt the value of free industry, he struggled bitterly against the young Minister's proposals to give freedom to Irish trade, and against his Commercial Treaty with France. His work seemed to be that of investing with a gorgeous poetry the policy of timid content which the Whigs believed they inherited from Sir Robert Walpole ; and the ver}' intensit)- of his trust in the natural devclope- ment of a people rendered him incapable of understanding the good that might come from particular laws or from special reforms. At this crisis then the temper of Burke squared with the temper of the Whig party. Rockingham and his fellow-ministers were driven, whether the}- would or no, to a practical acknowledgement of the policy which Pitt demanded ; but they resolved that the repeal of the Stamp Acts should be accompanied by a formal repudiation of the principles of colonial freedom which Pitt had laid down. A declaratory act was brought in, which asserted the supreme power of Parliament over the Colonies " in all cases what- soever." The passing of this act was followed by the introduction Feb. 1766 of a bill for the repeal of the Stamp Acts ; and in spite of the resistance of the King's friends, a resistance instigated by George himself, the bill was carried b)- a large majority. X MODERN ENGLAND 1687 From this moment the Ministry was unable to stand against Sec. 11 the general sense that the first man in the country should be its the inde- ruler, and bitter as was the King's hatred of him, he was forced to "'' -^i^'erica '^ 1761 call Pitt into office. Pitt's aim was still to unite the Whig party, to 1782 and though forsaken by Lord Temple, he succeeded to a great — extent in the administration which he formed in the summer of Chatham 1766. Though Rockingham stood coldly aside, some of his fellow Ministry ministers accepted ofifice, and they were reinforced by the few friends who clung to Pitt ; while Pitt stooped to strengthen his Parliamentary support by admitting some even of the " King's friends " to a share in the administration. But its life lay really in Pitt himself, in his immense popularity, and in the command which his eloquence gave him over the House of Commons. His acceptance of the Earldom of Chatham removed him to the House 1766 of Lords, and for a while ruined the confidence which his reputa- tion for unselfishness had aided him to win. But it was from no vulgar ambition that Pitt laid down his title of the Great Com- moner. It was the consciousness of failing strength which made him dread the storms of debate, and in a few months the dread became a certainty. A painful and overwhelming illness, the result of nervous disorganization, withdrew him from public affairs; and his withdrawal robbed his colleagues of all vigour or 1767 union. The plans which Chatham had set on foot for the better government of Ireland, the transfer of India from the Company to the Crown, and the formation of an alliance with Prussia and Russia to balance the Family Compact of the House of Bourbon, were suffered to drop. The one aim of the ministry which bore his name, and which during his retirement looked to the Duke of Grafton as its actual head, was simply to exist. But even exist- ence was difficult ; and Grafton saw himself forced to a union with the faction which was gathered under the Duke of Bedford, and to the appointment of a Tory noble as Secretary of State, The force of public opinion on which Pitt had relied turned at Wilkes , .. 1-111 i-rir • r and the once agamst the muiistry winch had so dnited from its former pariia- position. The elections for the new Parliament were more corrui)t "^^"* than any that had been yet witnessed. How bitter the indignation of the country had grown was seen in its fresh backing of Wilkes. He seized on the opening afforded by the elections to return from CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1689 France, and was elected member for Middlesex, a county the large sec. ii number of whose voters made its choice a real expression of public the inde- opinion. The choice of Wilkes was in effect a public condemnation of America of the House of Commons and the ministerial system. The minis- to try however and the House alike shrank from a fresh struggle with ^U the agitator ; but the King was eager for the contest. After ten '^ years of struggle and disappointment George had all but reached his aim. The two forces which had as yet worsted him v;ere both of them paralyzed. The Whigs were fatally divided, and dis- credited in the eyes of the country by their antagonism to Pitt. Pitt, on the other hand, was suddenly removed from the stage. The ministry was without support in the country ; and for Parlia- mentary support it was forced to lean more and more on the men who looked for direction to the King himself One form of oppo- sition alone remained in the public discontent ; and at this he struck more fiercely than ever. " I think it highly expedient to apprise you," he wrote to Lord North, " that the expulsion of Mr. Wilkes appears to be very essential, and must be effected." The Ministers and the House of Commons bowed to his will. By his non-appearance in court when charged with libel, Wilkes had become an outlaw, and he was now thrown into prison on his outlawry. Dangerous riots broke out in London and over the whole countr}'. The Ministry were torn with dissensions. The announcement of Lord Shelburne's purpose to resign office was j^esip-na- followcd by the resignation of Chatham himself; and his with- X'^'',*^ •^ '^ ' Chatham drawal from the Cabinet which traded on his name left the Minis- 176S try wholly dependent on the King. In 1769 Wilkes was brought before the bar of the House of Commons on a charge of libel, a crime which was cognizable in the ordinary courts of law ; and was expelled from Parliament. He was at once re-elected by^ the shire of Middlesex. Violent and oppressive as the course of the House of Commons had been, it had as yet acted within its strict right, for no one questioned its possession of a right of expulsion. But the defiance of Middlesex led it now to go further. It resolved, " That Mr. Wilkes having been in this session of Parlia- ment expelled the House, was and is incapable of being elected a member to serve in the present Parliament ; " and it issued a writ for a fresh clcctic^n. Middlesex answered this insolent claim to 1690 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. II The Inde- pendence OF America 1761 TO 1782 in/ikfs expelled limit the free choice of a constituency by again returning Wilkes ; and the House was driven by its anger to a fresh and more out- rageous usurpation. It again expelled the member for Middlesex ; and on his return for the third time by an immense majority, it voted that the candidate whom he had defeated, Colonel Luttrell, ought to have been returned, and was the legal representative of Middlesex. The Commons had not only limited at their own arbitrary discretion the free election of the constituency, but they had transferred its rights to themselves by seating Luttrell as member in defiance of the deliberate choice of Wilkes by the free- holders of Middlesex. The country at once rose indignantly against this violation of constitutional law. Wilkes was elected FKOMISPIECE TO MIDDLESEX iElj V, i'r-j- an Alderman of London ; and the Mayor, Aldermen, and Livery petitioned the King to dissolve the Parliament. A remonstrance from London and Westminster said boldly that " there is a time when it is clearly demonstrable that men cease to be representa- tives. That time is now arrived. The House of Commons do not represent the people." Meanwhile a writer who styled himself Junius attacked the Government in letters, which, rancorous and unscrupulous as was their tone, gave a new power to the literature of the Press by their clearness and terseness of statement, the finish _ ,. of their style, and the terrible vigour of their invective. Parlia- ^ ' '^ ment The storm however beat idly on the obstinacy of the King, and Reform The printer of the letters was prosecuted, and the petitions and MODERN ENGLAND 1691 remonstrances of London were haughtily rejected. At the be- sec. ii ginninw of I770 a cessation of the disease which had long held The inde- "^ ' ' "^ I'ENDENCE him prostrate enabled Chatham to reappear in the House of Lords. °^ amekica He at once denounced the usurpations of the Commons, and brought in a bill to declare them illegal. But his genius made him the first to see that remedies of this sort were inadequate to meet evils which really sprang from the fact that the House of Commons no longer represented the people of England ; and he mooted a plan for its reform by an increase of the county members, who then formed the most independent portion of the House. Further he could not go, for even in the proposals he made he stood almost alone. The Tories and the King's friends were not likely to welcome schemes which would lessen the King's influ- ence. The Whigs under Lord Rockingham had no sympathy with Par- liamentary reform ; and they shrank with haught)' disdain from the popular agitation in which public opinion was forced to express itself, and which Chatham, while censuring its extravagance, deliberately encouraged. It is from the quarrel between Wilkes and the House of Commons that TO 1782 His Speech to His Majesty Kmr, Cf.orge the mf j on the litoiyiajijyo. BECKFORDS MONUMENT IN THE GUILDHALL. 1692 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. sfc. II we may date the influence of public meetings on English the"u.dk- politics. The gatherings of the Middlesex electors in his sup- OK America pQ^t were prcludcs to the great meetings ot Yorkshire tree- 'to' holders in which the question of I'arliamentary reform rose '^ ' into importance ; and it was in the movement for reform, and the establishment of corresponding committees throughout the country for the purpose of promoting it, that the power of political agitation first made itself felt. Political societies and clubs took their part in this quickening and organization of public opinion : and the spread of discussion, as well as the influence which now began to be exercised by the appearance of vast numbers of men in support of any political movement, proved that Parliament would soon have to reckon with the sentiments of the people at large. Power But an agent far more effective than popular agitation was Press preparing to bring the force of public opinion to bear on Parlia- ment itself We have seen how much of the corruption of the House of Commons sprang from the secrecy of Parliamentary proceedings, but this secrecy was the harder to preserve as the nation woke to a greater interest in its own affairs. From the accession of the Georges imperfect reports of the more important discussions began to be published under the title of " The Senate of Lilliput," and with feigned names or simple initials to denote the speakers. Obtained by stealth and often merely recalled by memory, such reports were naturally inaccurate ; and their inaccu- racy was eagerly seized on as a pretext for enforcing the rules which guarded the .secrecy of proceedings in Parliament. In 1771 the Commons issued a proclamation forbidding the publication of debates ; and six printers, who set it at defiance, were summoned to the bar of the House. One who refused to appear was arrested by its messenger ; but the arrest at once brought the House into conflict with the magistrates of London. They set aside the proclamation as without legal force, released the printers, and sent the messenger to prison for unlawful arrest. The House sent the Lord Mayor to the Tower, but the cheers of the crowds which followed him on his way told that public opinion was again with the Press, and the attempt to hinder its publication of Parlia- mentar\- proceedings dropped silently on his release at the next MODERN ENGLAND 1693 prorogation. Few changes of equal importance have been so quietly brought about. Not only was the responsibility of members to their constituents made constant and effective by the publication of their proceedings, but the nation itself was called in to assist in the deliberations of its representatives. A new and wider interest in its own affairs was roused in the people at large, and a new political education was given to it through the dis- cussion of every subject of national importance in the Houses and the Press. Public opin- ion, as gathered up and represented on all its sides by the journals of the day, became a force in practical states- manship, influenced the course of de- bates, and con- trolled in a closer and more constant way than even Par- liament itself had been able to do the actions of the Gov- ernment. The im- portance of its new position gave a weight to the Press which it had never had before. The first great English journals date from this time. With the Morning CJironick, the Morning Post, the Morning Herald, 7\.x\A the Times, ?i\\ of which appeared in the interval between the opening j'cars of the American War and the beginning of the war with the French Revolution, jour- nalism took a new tone of responsibility and intelligence. The hacks of Grub Street were suijcrseded In- publicists of a high moral temper and literar)- excellence ; and philosophers like ("olcritlgcor Sec. II The Inde- pendence of .a.merica 1761 TO 1782 .... ~rr- — -',-s^'j»t^^iyg y ^ fe« s^ JlJC^,^^^ -^ / ^10 JrT^piBp^^^ffl --^_ ¥ -- W >i?^ ^^ T'^ - \S ' -fl' : . . ._rf..7^-M,_,-.::;;.?^^^ "A POLITICIAN.' After W. Hogarth. i604 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. II Statesmen like Canning turned to influence public opinion through Bui as yet these influences were feebly felt, and George the Third was able to set Chatham's policy disdainfully aside, and to The Indk- the columus of the Press. FENUKNCI-: OK America 1761 TO I "8'' '-" plunge into a contest far more disastrous than his contest with m.°Lnd the Press. In all the proceedings of the last few years, what had America ^^.^n^^^^i j^j,^^ ^^^^^ \^^^\ been the act which averted a war between England and her colonies. To the King the Americans were already " rebels," and the great statesman whose eloquence had ahettiih. rfu. ^j&TM^^^^^ CHART OF BOSTON HARBOUR, 1 733. Drawins: in British Museiciii. made their claims irresistible was a " trumpet of sedition." George deplored in his correspondence with his ministers the repeal of the Stamp Acts. " All men feel," he wrote, " that the fatal compliance in 1766 has increased the pretensions of the Americans to absolute independence." In America itself the news of the repeal had been received with universal joy, and taken as a close of the strife. Put on both sides there remained a pride and irritabilit}' which only wise handling could have alla\-ed ; and in the present state of English politics wise handling was MODERN ENGLAND 1695 impossible. Only a few months indeed passed before the quarrel Sec. ii was re-opened ; for no sooner had the illness of Lord Chatham The Inde- '■ PENDEN'CE removed him in 1767 from any real share in public affairs, than of America the wretched administration which bore his name suspended the Assembly of New York on its refusal to provide quarters for English troops, and resolved to assert British sovereignty by levying import duties of trivial amount at American ports. The Assembly of Massachusetts was dissolved on a trifling quarrel with its Governor, and Boston was occupied for a time by British soldiers. The remonstrances of the Legislatures of Massachusetts TO 1782 LANDING OF BRITISH TROOPS AT BOSTON, 1 768. Contemporary engraving by Paul Revere. and Virginia, however, coupled with a fall in the funds, warned the Ministers of the dangerous course on which they had entered ; and in 1769 the troops were withdrawn, and all duties, save one, abandoned. But the King insisted on retaining the duty on tea ; and its retention was enough to prevent any thorough restoration of good feeling. A series of petty quarrels went on in almost every colony between the popular Assemblies and the Governors appointed by the Crown, and the colonists persisted in their agreement to import nothing from the mother country. As )-et however there was no prospect of serious strife. In America the influence of George Washington allayed the irritation of Virginia. 1696 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. 11 Massachusetts contented itself with quarrelling with its Governor, ThTTsde- and refusing to buy tea so long as the duty was levied. In OF amekica England, even Grenville, though approving the retention ol the 'to^ duty in question, abandoned all dream of further taxation. \ls Hut the King was now supreme. The attack of Chatham in kL^k^ ^77^ l^'^*-^ completed the ruin of the Ministry. Those of his Ministry ^'i(_ihc rents who still clung to it resigned their posts ; and were followed by the Duke of Grafton. All that remained were the Bedford faction and the dependents of the King ; these were gathered under the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord North, into a ministry which was in fact a mere cloak for the direction of public affairs by George himself. " Not only did he direct the minister," a careful observer tells us, " in all important matters of foreign and domestic policy, but he instructed him as to the management of debates in Parliament, suggested what motions should be made or opposed, and how measures should be carried. He reserved for himself all the patronage, he arranged the whole cast of administration, settled the relative place and pretensions of ministers of State, law officers, and members of the household, nominated and promoted the English and Scotch judges, appointed and translated bishops and deans, and dispensed other preferments in the Church. He disposed of military governments, regiments, and commissions, and himself ordered the marching of troops. He gave and refused titles, honours, and pensions." All this immense patronage was steadily used for the creation and maintenance in both Houses of Parliament of a majorit}- directed by the King himself ; and its weight was seen in the steady action of such a majority. It was seen yet more in the subjection to which the ministry that bore North's name was reduced. George was in fact the minister through the twelve years of its existence, from 1770 till the close of the American war ; and the shame of the darkest hour of English history lies wholly at his door. The His fixed purpose was to seize on the first opportunity of ^Tea°" undoing the " fatal compliance of 1766." A trivial riot gave him Riots the handle he wanted. In December 1773 the arrival of some English ships laden with tea kindled fresh irritation in Boston, where the non-importation agreement was strictly enforced. A mob in the disguise of Indians boarded the vessels and flung their X MODERN ENGLAND 1697 contents into the sea. The outrage was deplored alike by the sec. 11 friends of America in England and by its own leading statesmen ; the inue- PENDENCE and both Washington and Chatham were prepared to support the °^ America 1761 Government in its looked-for demand of redress. But the thought to 1782 of the King was not of redress but of repression, and he set roughly — aside the more conciliatory proposals of Lord North and his fellow-ministers. They had already rejected as " frivolous and vexatious " a petition of the Assembly of Massachusetts for the dismissal of two public officers whose letters home advised the withdrawal of free institutions from the Colonies. They now seized on the riot as a pretext for rigorous measures. A bill introduced into Parliament in the beginning of 1774 punished Boston by closing its port against all commerce. Another punished the State of Massachusetts by withdrawing the liberties it had enjoyed ever since the Pilgrim Fathers landed on its soil. Its charter was altered. The choice of its Council was transferred from the people to the Crown, and the nomination of its judges was transferred to the Governor. In the Governor, too, by a provision more outrageous "than even these, was vested the right of sending all persons charged with a share in the late disturbances to England for trial. To enforce these measures of repression troops were sent to America, and General Gage, the commander-in-chief there, was appointed Governor of Massachusetts. The King's exultation at the prospect before him was unbounded. " The die," he wrote triumphantly to his minister, " is cast. The Colonies must either triumph or submit." Four regiments would be enough to bring the Americans to their senses. They would only be " lions while we are lambs." "If we take the resolute part," he decided solemnly, "they will undoubtedly be very meek." Unluckily, the blow at Massachusetts was received with anything but meekness. The jealousies between Resist- State and State were hushed by the sense that the liberties of all ""^'^ ?f J A mcrica were in danger. If the British Parliament could cancel the charter of Massachusetts and ruin the trade of Boston, it could cancel the charter of every colony and ruin the trade of every port from the St. Lawrence to the coast of Georgia. All therefore adopted the cause of Massachusetts ; and all their Legislatures, save that of Georgia, sent delegates to a Congress which assembled on the- 4th of September at Phihulclphia. Massachusetts took a }'ct holder r,E(.>Kr, K WAS 1 1 1 NGTUX. Picture by Gilbert Stuart, in possession of the Earl of Roscbery. CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1699 course. Not a citizen would act under the new laws. Its Assembly Sec. ii met in defiance of the Governor, called out the militia of the State, The Inde. PENDENXE and provided arms and ammunition for it. But there was still room °^ ameuica ^ 1761 for reconciliation. The resolutions of the Congress had been to moderate ; for Virginia was the wealthiest and most influential - — among the States who sent delegates ; and though resolute to resist the new measures of the Government, Virginia still clung to the mother country. At home, the merchants of London and Bristol pleaded loudly for reconciliation ; and in January 1775 Chatham again came forward to avert a strife he had once before succeeded in preventing. With characteristic largeness of feeling he set aside all half-measures or proposals of compromise. " It is not cancelling a piece of parchment," he insisted, " that can win back America : you must respect her fears and her resentments." The bill which he introduced in concert with Franklin provided for the repeal of the late acts and for the security of the colonial charters, abandoned the claim to taxation, and ordered the recall of the troops. A colonial assembly was directed to meet and provide means by which America might contribute towards the payment of the public debt. Chatham's measure was contemptuously rejected by the Lords, The In- depend- as was a similar measure of Burke's by the Commons, and a ence of petition of the City of London in favour of the Colonies by the m^^^a King himself. With the rejection of these efforts at reconciliation began the great struggle which ended eight years later in the severance of the American Colonies from the British Crown. The Congress of delegates from the Colonial Legislatures at once voted measures for general defence, ordered the levy of an army, and set George Washington at its head. No nobler figure ever stood in Ccor^e the forefront of a nation's life. Washington was grave and ^f'"x^""g- ^ ^ ton courteous in address ; his manners were simple and unpretend- ing, his silence and the serene calmness of his temper spoke of a perfect self-mastery; but there was little in his outer bearing to reveal the grandeur of soul which lifts his figure, with all the simple majesty of an ancient statue, out of the smaller passions, the meaner impulses of the world around him. What recom- mended him for command was simj)!}- his weight among his fellow landowners of Virginia, and the experience of war which Vol.. IV— Pakt 37 5 K 1700 HISTORY OK THE ExXGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. II he had stained by service in border contests with the French and The iNDE- the Indians, as well as in Braddock's Uicklcss expedition a'^ainst I'ENUENCE OK America p^j-j. Duquesnc. It was Only as the weary fight went on that the colonists learned little by little the greatness of their leader, his TO 1 78: clear judgement, his heroic endurance, his silence under difficulties, his calmness in the hour of tlanger or defeat, the patience with which he waited, the quickness and hardness with which he struck, the lofty and serene sense of duty that never swerved from its task AMERICAN RIFLEMAN. AMERICAN GENERAL. E Barnard^ "'History of England," 17^0. through resentment or jealousy, that never through war or peace felt the touch of a meaner ambition, that knew no aim save that of guarding the freedom of his fellow countr\-mcn, and no personal longing save that of returning to his own fireside when their freedom was secured. It was almost unconsciously that men learned to cling to Washington with a trust and faith such as few other men have won, and to regard him with a reverence which still hushes us in presence of his memory. Even America hardly MODERN ENGLAND 1701 recognised his real greatness till death set its seal on " the man Sec. 11 first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his fellow The inde ' Sr ' PENDEN'CE countrymen." Washington more than any of his fellow colonists represented the clinging of the Virginian landowners to the mother- country, and his acceptance of the command proved that even the most moderate among them had no hope now save in arms. The struggle opened with a skirmish between a party of English troops -^P'^'^^IIS and a detachment of militia at Lexington, and in a few days twenty thousand colonists appeared before Boston. The Congress OK America 1761 1782 Opening of the IV a r AliACK UN BUNKERS HILL ANU BUKMNci OF CHARLES 1 OWN. Barnard, '^ History of England " 1790. re-assembled, declared the States they represented " The United Colonies of America," and undertook the work of government. Meanwhile ten thousand fresh troops landed at Boston ; but the provincial militia seized the neck of ground which joins it to the mainland, and though they were driven from the heights of June 17 Bunker's Hill which commanded the town, it was only after a desperate struggle in which their braver)- put an end for c\er to the taunts of cowardice which had been levclletl . against the colonists. "Are the Yankees cowards.'" shouted tlic men of 5 K 2 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. 1782 Sec. II Massachusetts, as the first Engh'sh attack rollctl back baffled down The Indk- thc hill-sidc. lUit a far truer courac^e was shown in the stubborn I'ENDESth OF America cndurancc with which Washington's raw militiamen, who gradually dwindled from sixteen thousand to ten, ill fed, ill armed, and with but fort\'-five rounds of ammunition to each man, cooped up through the winter a force of ten thousand \-cterans in the lines of Boston. Thc spring of 1776 saw them force these troops to withdraw from the city to New York, where the whole Ih'itish army, largely reinforced by mercenaries from Germany, was MEDAL COM.MEMOKATING SIEGE OF LOSTON, I776. (Reverse.) concentrated under General Howe. Meanwhile a raid of the American General, Arnold, ncarh' drove the British troops from Canada ; and though his attempt broke down before Quebec, it showed that all hope of reconciliation was over. The Colonies of the south, the last to join in the struggle, had in fact expelled their Governors at the close of 1775 ; at the opening of the next year Massachusetts instructed its delegates to support a complete repudiation of thc King's government by the Colonies ; while the American ports were thrown open to the world in defiance of the MODERN ENGLAND 1703 Navigation Acts. These decisive steps were followed by the great Sec. ii act with which American history begins, the adoption on the 4th i'he Inde- HENDENCE of July, 1776, by the delegates in Congress of a Declaration of >Jf America Independence. " We," ran its solemn words, " the representatives to of the United States of America in Congress assembled, appeal- — ing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of //^^ ^f our intentions, solemnly publish and declare that these United ^«^^A-_"«'- mi:d.\i. commemoratinc; dkci^akation of independenck, 1776. Snowdcn, " Medals of Washington. " Colonics are, and of right ought to be, Free and Independent States." The earlier successes of the Colonists were soon followed by Death of .suffering and defeat. Howe, an active general with a fine arni\- at ^''^'^^"^ his back, cleared Long Island in August by a victory at ]5rookI>-n ; and Washington, whose army was weakened by withdrawals and defeat, and disheartened by the loyal tone of the State in w hich it 1704 lllSi'OKV Ui' THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. TO 1782 Sec. II was ciicampcd, was forced to evacuate New York and New Jersey, THn^DE- and to fall back first on the Hudson and then on the Delaware. PENDENCE „ r i^l -1 1 1 1 • 1 1 OF America "phc Conercss prepared to flv from Philadelphia, and a general 1761 & Jr 1 despair showed itself in cries of peace. But a well-managed surprise and a daring march on the rear of Howe's army restored the spirits of Washington's men, and forced the English general in his turn to fall back on New York. The campaign of 1777 opened with a combined effort for the suppression of the revolt. An army assembled in Canada under General Burgoyne marched by way of the Lakes to seize the line of the Hudson, and with help from the army at New York to cut off New England from her sister provinces. Howe meanwhile sailed up the Chesapeake, and advanced on Philadelphia, the tem- poral'}' capital of the United States and the seat of the Congress. The rout of his little arm\- of seven thousand men at Bran- dywinc forced Washington to abandon Philadelphia, and, after a bold but unsuc- cessful attack on his victors, to retire into winter quarters on the banks of the Schu)-lkill ; where the unconquerable re- solve with which he nerved his handful of beaten and half-starved troops to face Howe's army in their camp at Valley Forge is the noblest of his triumphs. But in the North the war had taken another colour. When Burgoyne appeared on the Upper Hudson he found the road to Albany barred b}- an American force under General Gates. The spirit of New England, which had grown dull as the war rolled away from its borders, quickened again at the news of imasion and of the outrages committed by the Lidians whom Burgo}-nc emplo)-ed among his troops. Its militia hurried from town and homestead to the camp ; and after a fruitless attack on the American lines, Saratoga Burgoyne saw himself surrounded on the heights of Saratoga. On the 17th of October he was compelled to surrender. The news of this calamity gave force to the words with which Chatham at the very time of the surrender was pressing for peace. " You cannot conquer America," he cried when men were glorying in Llowe's THE LIBERTY BELI,, PHILADELPHIA. Los sin ff, " Cyclo/>adta of United States History." MODERN ENGLAND 1705 successes. " If I were an American as I am an Englishman, while Sec. ii a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down The inde- O J- J ^ ' * PENDENCE my arms — never, never, never!" Then in a burst of indignant ofa^'|r>ca eloquence he thundered against the use of the Indian and his to i ^ 1782 scalping-knife as allies of England against her children. The -— •^ ° 1 • i. ■ Chatham & proposals which Chatham brought forward might perhaps, ni his proposals hands, even yet have drawn America and the mother country together. His plan was one of absolute conciliation, and of a federal union between the settlements and Great Britain which would have left the Colonies absolutely their own masters in all matters of internal government, and linked only by ties of affection and loyalty to the general body of the Empire. But it met with the same fate as his previous proposals. Its rejection was at once followed by the news of Saratoga, and by the yet more fatal news that this disaster had roused the Bourbon Courts to avenge the humiliation of the Seven Years' War. In February 1778 France concluded an alliance with the States. Lord North strove to meet the blow b\' fresh offers of conciliation, and by a pledge to renounce for ever the right of direct taxation over the Colonies ; but he felt that the time for conciliation was past, while all hope of reducing America by force of arms had disappeared. George indeed was as obstinate for war as ever ; and the country, stung to the quick by the attack of France, backed passionately the obstinacy of the King. But unlike George the Third, it instinc- tively felt that if a hope still remained of retaining the friendship of the Colonies, and of baffling the efforts of the Bourbons, it lay in Lord Chatham ; and in spite of the King's resistance the voice of the whole country called him back to power. But on the eve of his return to office this last chance was shattered by the hand of death. Broken with age and disease, the Earl was borne to the House of Lords to utter in a few broken words his protest against April ^ the proposal to surrender America. " I rejoice," he murmured, "that I am still alive to lift up my voice against the dismember- ment of this ancient and noble monarchy. His Majesty succeeded to an Empire as great in extent as its reputation was unsullied. Seventeen years ago this people was the terror of the workl." lie listened impatiently to the reply of the l^uke of Riclnnond. and again rose to his feet. Bui he had hardl)- risen whuii lie prcssctl CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1707 his hand upon his heart, and falling back in a swoon was borne sec. ii home to die. The inde- pendence From the hour of Chatham's death England entered on a of America conflict with enemies whose circle gradually widened till she stood to single-handed against the world. At the close of 1778 Spain — • • Progress jomed the league of France and America against her ; and in the of the next year the joint fleets of the two powers rode the masters of the ^^'^ Channel. They ev^en threatened a descent on the English coast. But dead as Chatham was, his cry woke a new life in England. "Shall we fall prostrate," he exclaimed with his last breath, " before the House of Bourbon ? " and the divisions which had broken the nation in its struggle with American liberty were hushed in the presence of this danger to its own existence. The weakness of the Ministry was compensated by the energy of England itself For three years, from 1779 to 1782, General Eliott held against famine and bombardment the rock fortress of Gibraltar. Although a quarrel over the right of search banded Holland and the Courts of the North in an armed neutrality against her, and added the Dutch fleet to the number of her assailants, England held her own at sea. Even in America the fortune of the war seemed to turn. After Burgoyne's surrender the English generals had withdrawn from Penns}-lvania, and bent all their efforts on the South where a strong Royalist party still existed. The capture of Charlestown and the successes of Lord Cornwallis in 1780 were rendered fruitless by the obstinate resistance of General Greene : but the States were weak- ened b}' bankruptcy, and unnerved by hopes of aid from France. Meanwhile England was winning new triumphs in the East. Since the day of Plassey, Lidia had been fast passing into the England hands of the merchant company whose traders but a few years india before held only three petty factories along its coast. The victor}^ which laid Bengal at the feet of Clivc had been followed in 1760 by a victory at Wandewash, in which Colonel Cootc's defeat of Lally, the French Governor of Pondicherry, established British supremacy over Southern India. The work of organization had soon to follow on that of conquest ; for the tyranny and corruption of the merchant-clerks v.-ho suddenly found themselves lifted into rulers was fast ruining the i)ro\-ince of Bengal; and although ("live had profited more than any oilier \)y the sjkjIIs of his victor\-, he ijoS HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. II saw that the time had come when greed must give way to the The i.NDE. responsibilities of power. In 176^ he returned to India, and the two OF America ^.^ars of his rulc wcrc in fact the most glorious N'cars in his life. In 1 761 the teeth of opposition from every clerk and of mutiny throughout the arm\', he put down the private trading of the Company's servants and forbade their acceptance of gifts from the natives. TO 1782 LORD CLIVE. From an engraving by Dartolozzi, after the piciicre by Xatliaiiiel Dance. Clive set an example of disinterestedness by handing over to public uses a legacy which had been left him by the prince he had raised to the throne of Bengal ; and returned poorer than he went to face the storm his acts had roused among those who were interested in Indian abuses at home. His unsparing denunciations of the mis- government of Bengal at last stirred even Lord North to interfere ; X MODERN ENGLAND 1709 and when the financial distress of the Company drove it for aid to sec. ii Government, the ^rant of aid was coupled with measures of admin- the inde- '■ I'ENDEXCE istrative reform. The Regulating Act of 1773 established a of America Governor-General and a Supreme Court of Judicature for all British to possessions in India, prohibited judges and members of Council — from trading, forbade any receipt of presents from natives, and ordered that every act of the Directors should be signified to the Government to be approved or disallowed. The new interest which had been aroused in the subject of India was seen in an investiga- tion of the whole question of its administration by a Committee of the House of Commons. Clive's own early acts were examined with unsparing severity. His bitter complaint in the Lords that, Baron of Plassey as he was, he had been arraigned like a sheep- stealer, failed to prevent the passing of resolutions which censured the corruption and treachery of the early days of British rule in India, Here, however, the justice of the House stopped. When his accusers passed from the censure of Indian misgovernment to the censure of Clive himself, the memory of his great deeds won from the House of Commons a unanimous vote, " That Robert Lord Clive did at the same time render great and meritorious services to his country." By the act of 1773 Warren Hastings was named Governor- Warren General of Bengal, with powers of superintendence and control over the other presidencies. Hastings was sprung of a noble famil}- which had long fallen into decay, and poverty had driven him in boyhood to accept a writership in the Company's service. Clive,' whose quick eye discerned his merits, drew him after Plassey into political life ; and the administrative ability he showed, during the disturbed period which followed, raised him step by step to the post of Governor of Bengal. No man could have been better fitted to discharge the duties of the new office which the Government at home had created without a thought of its real greatness. Hastings was gifted with rare powers of organization and control. His first measure was to establish the direct rule of tlie Compan\' over Bengal by abolishing the government of its native princes, which, though it had become nominal, In'ndcred all plans for effective administratifjn. The Nabob sank into a pcnsionar)-, and the Compan\-'s new province was rough!)- hut cfficientl)- organized. Hastings 1 7 lo HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP, Sec. II Out of thc clcrks and traders about him Hastings formed that body The iNDE- of public scvvants which still remains the noblest product of our PENDENCE ' ^ OF America j.^j|^_> j,^ India. The sv^tcm of law and finance which he devised, 1761 . TO hast\' and inipericct as it necessarily was, was far superior to any 1782 ' ' / ' 1 / ^WARREN HASTINGS. From a mezzotint by T. IVatson (1777), after Sir J. Reynolds. that India had ever seen. Corruption he put down with as firm a hand as Clive's, but he won the love of the new " civilians " as he won thc love of the Hindoos. Although he raised the revenue of Bengal and was able to send liome every year a surplus of half a million to the Company, he did this without laying a fresh burden MODERN ENGLAND 17 ii on the natives or losing their good will. His government was Sec. 11 guided b\' an intimate knowledge of and sympathy with the people. The inde- PENDENCE At a time when their tongue was looked on simply as a medium of of America trade and business, Hastings was skilled in the languages of India ; to 1782 he was versed in native customs, and familiar with native feeling. — We can hardly wonder that his popularity with the Bengalees was such as no later ruler has ever attained, or that after a century of great events Indian mothers still hush their infants with the name of Warren Hastings. As yet, though English influence was great in the south, Bengal India alone was directly in English hands. Warren Hastings recognized American a formidable danger to the power of Britain in that of the ^^*' Mahrattas, freebooters of Hindoo blood whose tribes had for a century past carried their raids over India from the hills of the western coast, and founded sovereignties in Guzerat, Malwa, and Tanjore, and who were bound by a slight tie of subjection to the Mahratta chief who reigned at Poonah. The policy of Hastings was to prevent the Mahrattas from over-running the whole of India, and taking the place which the Mogul Emperors had occupied. He bound native princes, as in Oudh or Berar, by treaties and subsidies, crushed without scruple the Rohillas to strengthen his all}- the Nabob Vizier of Oudh, and watched with incessant jealousy the growth of powers even as distant as the Sikhs. The jealousy of France sought in the Mahrattas a counter- poise to the power of Britain, and through their chieftain the French envoys were able to set the whole confederacy in motion against the English presidencies. The danger was met by Hastings with characteristic swiftness of resolve. His difficulties were great. For two years he had been rendered powerless through the opposition of his Council ; and when freed from this obstacle the Company pressed him incessantly for money, and the Crown more than once strove to recall him. His own general, Sir Eyre Coote, was miserly, capricious, and had to be humoured like a child. Censures and complaints reached him with every mail. But his calm self-command never failed. No trace of his embarrassment showed itself in his work. The war with the Mahrattas was pressed with a tenacity of purpose which the blunders of subor- dinates and the inefficiency of the soldiers he was forced to use HISTORY OF THE EXCiLISH PEOPLE chap, x Sec. II never shook for a moment. Failure followed failure, and success The inde- had hardK' been wruni^from fortune when '^ ■' PENDENCE Nor would America wait any longrer for the satisfaction of her of America ... 1761 allies. In November her commissioners sigrned the preliminaries to ^ ^ 1782 of a peace, in which Britain reserved to herself on the American — Tv€ci tics continent only Canada and the island of Newfoundland, and of peace acknowledged without reserve the independence of the United States. The treaty of peace with the United States was a prelude to treaties of peace with the Bourbon powers. France indeed won nothing in the treaties with which the war ended ; Spain gained only Florida and Minorca. England, on the other hand, had won ground in India ; she had retained Canada ; her West Indian islands were intact ; she had asserted her command of the seas. But at the close of the war there was less thought of what she had retained than of what she had lost. The American Colonies were irrecoverably gone. It is no wonder that in the first shock of such a loss England looked on herself as on the verge of ruin, or that the Bourbon Courts believed her position as a world-power to be practically at an end. How utterly groundless such a con- ception was the coming years were to show. 1111. •' ui.icovi.i;'. ^'.'r ,!. . .,111; ;. Lindsay, ''History of Merchant Shipping;" from a d rawing ly E. \V. Cook, R.A. lyiS HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 THE IMPEACHMENT. Satire on Burke, Fox. and Shericia/i, by J. Gillray, 1791. England and the World Section III. — The Second Pitt, 1783 — 1793 ^Authorities. — Mr. Massey's account of this period may be supplemented by Lord Stanhope's " Life of Pitt," Lord Russell's " Memoirs of Fox,'' and the Correspondence of Lord Malmesbury, Lord Auckland, and Mr. Rose. For the Slave Trade, see the ]\Iemoirs of Wilberforce by his sons. Burke may be studied in his Life by Macknight, in Mr. Morley's valuable essay on him, and above all in his own works. The state of foreign affairs in 1789 is best seen in Von Sybel's " History of the French Revolution."] That in the creation of the United States the world had reached one of the turning points in its histor}- scems at the time to have entered into the thought of not a single European statesman. What startled men most at the moment was the discovery that England herself was far from being ruined by the greatness of her defeat. She rose from it indeed stronger and more vigorous than ever. Never had she shown a mightier energy than in the struggle against France which followed only ten }-ears after her loss of America, nor did she ever stand higher among the nations than on the da)' of Waterloo. Her real greatness, however, lay not in th^ old world but in the new. She was CANADA. from that hour a mother of nations. In America she had begotten a great people, and her emigrant ships were r\ r\ f\ r\ r\ /^ r\ r\ N EW FOU N D LAN D . MODERN ENGLAND 1719 still to carry on the movement of the Teutonic race from which she herself had sprung. Her work was to be coloniza- tion. Her settlers were to dispute Africa with the Kaffir and the Hottentot ; SEAL OF CAPE OF GOOD HOPE, EASTERN DIVISION.^ Collection of Mr. Allan lljon. SEAL OF NATAL. Collection of Mr. Allan Wyon. Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 NEW SOUTH WALES. they were to build up in the waters of the Pacific colonies as great as those which she had lost in America. And to the nations that she founded she was to give not only her blood and her speech, but the freedom which she had won. It is the thought of this which flings its grandeur round the pettiest details of our story in the past. The history of France has little result beyond France itself. German or Italian history has no direct issue outside the bounds of Germany or Italy. But England is only a small part of the outcome of English history. Its greater issues lie not within the narrow limits of the mother island, but in the destinies of nations yet to be. The struggles of her patriots, the wisdom of her statesmen, the steady love of liberty and law in her people at large, were shaping in the past of our little island the future of mankind. Meanwhile the rapid dcvelopemicnt of indus- trial energy and industrial wealth in l''ngland itself was telling on the conditions of ICnglish statesmanship. 'I'hough the Tories antl "King's friends " hat! now grown to a crjinijact body fjf a Innidrcd and fill)- members TASMANIA. The Rock- ingham Ministry 1720 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. Ill the Whigs, who held office under Lord Rockingham, were superior to their rivals in numbers and political character, now that the return of the l^cclfortl section to the general body of the party during its steady opposition to the American war had restored much of its old cohesion. But this reunion only strengthened their aristocratic and exclusive tendencies, and widened the breach which was steadil}- opening on questions such as Parliamentary Reform, THt Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 WILLIAM I'l LL. Ficiurc hy T. Gainsborough. between the bulk of the Whig party and the small fragment which remained true to the more popular s}-mpathies of Chatham. Lord Shelburne stood at the head of the Chatham part}', and it was re- inforced at this moment by the entr}' into Parliament of the second son of Chatham himself. William Pitt had hardly reached his twenty-second year ; but he left college with the learning of a ripe scholar, and his read)- and sonorous eloquence had been matured MODERN ENGLAND 1721 by his father's teaching. '' He will be one of the first men in Parliament," said a member to the Whig leader, Charles Fox, after Pitt's first speech in the House of Commons. " He is so already," replied Fox. The haughty self-esteem of the new statesman breathed in cvcr\- movement of his tall, spare figure, in the hard I'lIAKl.E.S J.A.MES Fox. I'icliiic by Karl Anton Ilickcl, in the National Po>t>\iit Galkiy. lines of a countenance which none but his closer friends saw lighted by a smile, in his cold and repulsive address, his invariable gravit)- of demeanour, and his habitual air of command. How great the qualities were which la)- beneath, this haught\' exterior no one knew ; nor had an}- one guessed how soon this " bo\-," as his rivals Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 1722 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. Ill The Skcon 1 1 Put 1783 TO 1793 Economi- cal Reform 1782 The Coalition mockingly styled him, was to crush every opponent and to hold I'ji^Mand at his will. He refused any minor post in the Rocking- h;iin Administration, claiming, if he took office at all, to be at once admitted to the Cabinet. Hut Pitt had no desire to take office under Rockingham. To him as to Chatham the main lesson of the war was the need of putting an end to those abuses in the com- position of Parliament by which George the Third had been enabled to plunge the country into it. A thorough reform of the Mouse of Commons was the only effectual means of doing this, and Pitt brought forward a bill founded on his father's plans for that purpose. But the great bulk of the Whigs could not resolve on the sacrifice of property and influence which such a reform would involve. Pitt's bill was thrown out ; and in its stead the Ministry endea\oured to weaken the means of corrupt influence which the King had unscrupulously used by disqualifying persons holding government contracts from sitting in Parliament, by depriving re- venue officers of the elective franchise (a measure which diminished the influence of the Crown in seventy boroughs), and above all by a bill for the reduction of the civil establishment, of the pension list, and of the secret service fund, which was brought in by Burke. These measures were to a great extent effectual in diminishing the influence of the Crown over Parliament, and they are memorable as marking the date when the direct bribery of members absolutely ceased. But they were absolutely inoperative in rendering, the House of Commons really representative of or responsible to the people of England. The jealousy which the mass of the Whigs entertained of the Chatham section and its plans was more plainly shown on the death of Lord Rockingham in July. Shelburne was no sooner called to the head of the Ministry than Fox, who acted on personal grounds, and the bulk of Rockingham's followers resigned. Pitt on the other hand accepted office as Chancellor of the Exchequer. The Shelburne ^Ministry only lasted long enough to conclude the final peace with the United States ; for in the opening of 1783 it was overthrown by the most unscrupulous coalition known in our history, that of the ^^ hig followers of Fox with the Tories who still clung to Lord North. Never had the need of representative reform been more clearly shown than b\- a coalition which proved how powerless MODERN ENGLAND 1723 was the force of public opinion to check even the most shameless faction in Parliament, how completely the lessening of the royal influence by the measures of Burke and Rockingham had tended to the profit, not of the people, but of the borough-mongers who usurped its representation. Pitt's renewed proposal of Parliamentary FRONT OK THE OLD EAST INDIA HOUSE. Danvers, ''' India OOicc Records." Reform was rejected by a majority of two to one. Secure in their Parliamentary majority, and heedless of the power of public opinion without the walls of the House of Commons, the new Ministers entered boldly on a greater task than had as yet taxed the constructive genius of English statesincn. To Icaxc such a dominion as Warren Hastings had Iniilt ii]) in India to the coiUrol Sec. ni The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 hid in Bin CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1725 of a mere company of traders was clearly impossible ; and Fox Sec. hi proposed to transfer the political government from the Directors of ^he the Company to a board of seven Commissioners. The appoint- ^'"' ment of the seven was vested in the first instance in Parliament, and to 1793 afterwards in the Crown ; their office w^as to be held for five years, — but they were removeable on address from either House of Parlia- ment. The proposal was at once met with a storm of opposition. The scheme indeed was an injudicious one ; for the new Commis- sioners would have been destitute of that practical knowledge of India which belonged to the Company, while the want of any immediate link between them and the actual Ministry of the Crown would have prevented Parliament from exercising an effective control over their acts. But the real faults of this India Bill were hardly noticed in the popular outcry against it. The merchant- class was galled by the blow levelled at the greatest merchant-bod)' in the realm : corporations trembled at the cancelling of a charter ; the King viewed the measure as a mere means of transferring the patronage of India to the Whigs. With the nation at large the faults of the bill lay in the character of the Ministry which proposed it. To give the rule and patronage of India over to the existing House of Commons was to give a new and immense power to a body which misused in the grossest way the power it possessed. It was the sense of this popular feeling which encouraged the King to Fall exert his personal influence to defeat the measure in the Lords, Coalition and on its defeat to order his Ministers to deliver up the seals. In December 1783 Pitt accepted the post of First Lord of the Treasury ; but his position would at once have been untenable had the country gone with its nominal representatives. He was de- feated again and again by large majorities in the Commons ; but the majorities dwindled as a shower of addresses from cvcr\- quarter, from the Tory University of Oxford as from the Whig Corporation of London, proved that public opinion went with the Minister and not with the House. It was the general .sense of this which justified Pitt in the firmness with which, in the teeth of addres.ses for his removal from office, he delayed the dissolution of Parliament for five months, and gained time for that ripening of national sentiment on which he counted for success. When the election of 1784 came the struggle was at (jnce at an cnil. The 1726 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. Ill public fccling had become strong enough to break through the The corrupt influences which commonly governed its representation. .Skco.nd William Pitt ''"T Ever\' great constitucnc)- returned supporters to Pitt ; of the ro"^ majority which had defeated him in the Commons a hundred and '793 — sixty members were unseated ; and only a fragment of the Whig party was saved by its command of nomination boroughs. When Parliament came together after the overthrow of the Coalition, the Minister of twenty-five was master of England as no Minister had been before. Even the King yielded to his sway, partly through gratitude for the triumph he had won for him over the Whigs, partly from a sense of the madness which was soon to strike him down, but still more from a gradual discovery that the triumph which he had won over his political rivals had been won, not to the profit of the Crown, but of the nation at large. The Whigs, it was true, were broken, unpopular, and without a policy, while the Tories clung to the Minister who had " saved the King." But it was the support of a new political power that really gave his .strength to the young Minister. The sudden rise of English industry was pushing the manufacturer to the front ; and all that the trading classes loved in Chatham, his nobleness of temper, his consciousness of power, his patriotism, his sj^mpathy with a wider world than the world within the Parliament-house, the\' saw in his son. He had little indeed of the poetic and imaginative side of Chatham's genius, of his quick perception of what was just and what was possible, his far-reaching conceptions of national policy, his outlook into the future of the world. Pitt's flowing and sonorous commonplaces rang hollow beside the broken phrases which still make his father's eloquence a living thing to English- men. On the other hand he possessed some qualities in which Chatham was utterly wanting. His temper, though naturally ardent and sensitive, had been schooled in a proud self-command. His simplicity and good taste freed him from his father's ostenta- tion and extravagance. Diffuse and commonplace as his .speeches seem, they were adapted as much by their very qualities of diffuseness and commonplace as by their lucidity and good sense to the intelligence of the middle classes whom Pitt felt to be his real audience. In his love of peace, his immense industry, his despatch of business, his skill in debate, his knowledge of finance THE HOUSE "I Painted in London by Karl Anton Hickel. Presented June, \%lw of Hungary to her Excellency La OviONS IN 1793. unfierinl Majesty the Evipernr Francis Joseph of Austria and King If for the National Portrait Gallery. MODERN ENGLAND 1727 he recalled Sir Robert Walpole ; but he had virtues which Walpole never possessed, and he was free from W'alpole's worst defects. He was careless of personal gain. He was too proud to rule by corruption. His lofty self-esteem left no room for any jealousy of subordinates. He was generous in his appreciation of }-outhful merits ; and the " boys " he gathered round him, such as Canning and Lord Wcllesley, rewarded his generosity by a devotion which death left untouched. With Walpole's cynical inaction Pitt had no sympathy whatever. His policy from the first was one of active reform, and he faced every one of the problems, financial, constitutional, religious, from which Walpole had shrunk. Above all he had none of Walpole's scorn of his fellow-men. The noblest feature in his mind was its wide humanit}-. His love for England was as deep and personal as his father's love, but of the s\-mpath}- with English passion and English prejudice which had been at once his father's weakness and strength he had not a trace. When Fox taunted him with forgetting Chatham's jealousy of France and his faith that she was the natural foe of England, Pitt answered nobly that '•' to suppose any nation can be unalterably the enemy of another is weak and childish." The temper of the time and the larger s}'mpathy of man with man, which especially marks the eighteenth century as a turning-point in the history of the human race, was everywhere bringing to the front a new order of statesmen, such as Turgot and Joseph the Second, whose characteristics were a love of mankind, and a belief that as the happiness of the individual can onl\' be secured by the general happiness of the community to which he belongs, so the welfare of individual nations can only be secured by the general welfare of the world. Of these Pitt was one. But he rose high above the rest in the consummate knowledge, and the practical force which he brought to the realisation of his aims. Pitt's strength lay in finance ; and he came forward at a time when the growth of English wealth made a knowledge of finance cs.sential to a great minister. The progress of the nation was wonderful. Population more than doubled during the eighteenth century, and the advance of wealth was even greater than that of population. The war had added a hundred millions to tlu- national debt, but the burden was hard!)- fell. The loss of America only Sec. Ill The Second Pitt X783 TO 1793 English Industry 1728 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. m The Second Pitt '7«3 TO Matiufiic- tares increased the commerce with that country ; and industry had begun that g^reat career which was to make Britain the workshop of the world. rhoLiy;h England already stood in the first rank of commercial states at the accession of George the Third, her in- dustrial life at home was mainly agricultural. The wool-trade had gradually established itself in Norfolk, the West Riding of Yorkshire, and the counties of the south-west ; while the manufac- ture of cotton was still almost limited to Manchester and Bolton, and remained so unimportant that in the middle of the eighteenth century the export of cotton goods hardly reached the value of fifty -"•"'^^'^c-^ .L.ft)^^^ w\ ■ .>/ij|B L.| . -■ \ ' v' ■ ' '^nsK^^H Mil^^^B^^^^HflM^^^^^*^j n^^ y |# 1 ^ -^^^ ^ifl^^^HHFn M»l^ 1 Pj |,^. t^ l;S=it- ''^ j!fm^ WAGON. Pync, ''^Costumes of Great Britain" 1808. thousand a year. There was the same slow and steady progress in the linen trade of Belfast and Dundee, and the silks of Spital- fields. The processes of manufacture were too rude to allow any large increase of production. It was only where a stream gave force to turn a mill-wheel that the wool-worker could establish his factory ; and cotton was as yet spun by hand in the cottages, the "spinsters" of the family sitting with their distaffs round the weaver's handloom. But had the processes of manufacture been more efficient, they would have been rendered useless by the want of a cheap and easy means of transport. The older main roads, MODERN ENGLAND 1729 which had lasted fairly through the middle ages, had broken down in later times before the growth of traffic and the increase of wagons and carriages. The new lines of trade lay often along mere country lanes which had ncv^er been more than horse- tracks. Much of the woollen trade therefore had to be carried on by means of long trains of pack-horses ; and in the case of yet heavier goods, such as coal, distribution was almost impracticable, save along the greater rivers or in districts accessible from the sea. A new aera began when the engineering genius of Brindley joined Manchester Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 Roads and cafia/s AQUEDUCT ii\-KK THK IRWKl.I, AT BARTON, LANXASHIKE. From an engraving by W. Orine, 1793. with its port of Liverpool in 1767 by a canal which crossed the Irwcll on a lofty aqueduct ; the success of the experiment .soon led to the universal introduction of water-carriage, and Great Britain was traversed in every direction by three thousand miles of navieable canals. At the same time a new iinnf)rtancc was Coal and given to the coal which lay beneath the soil of I'lngland. The stores of iron which had lain side by side with it in the northern counties had lain there unworked through the scarcity of wood, which was looked upon as the <^nly fuul b)' whicli it could be < ^ CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1731 smelted. In the middle of the eighteenth century a process for smelting iron with coal turned out to be effective ; and the whole aspect of the iron-trade was at once revolutionized. Iron was to become the working material of the modern world ; and it is its production of iron which more than all else has placed England at the head of industrial Europe. The value of coal as a means of Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 JAMp;?. WATT. From an engraving; hy C. Titnu-r after a portrait by Sir T. Lawrence. producing mechanical force was revealed in the discover}' by which Watt in 1765 transformed the Steam-Engine from a mere toy into the most wonderful instrument which human industry has ever had at its command. The inxcntion came at a moment when the ex- isting .supply of manual labour could no longer cope with the demands of the manufacturcns. Three successive inventions in twelve years, that of the spinning-jenn\' in 1764 by the weaver Vol. IV— Part 37 5 I' The Sfcnni- Kiiirinc 173- llIsrORV OF I'HE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP Sec. Ill Hargreaves, of the spinning-machine in 176S by the barber Arkwright, of the "mule" b)- the weaver Crompton in 1776 were followed b\- the iliscover\- of the power-loom. lUit these would have been comparativel)- useless had it not been for the revelation of a new and inexhaustible labour-force in the steam-engine. It was the combination of such a force with such means of appl\ing it that The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 SAMUEL CRO.MPTON. From ail cng7-avino hy C. Turner after a portrait hy Allins^hain. Adam Smith enabled Britain during the terrible years of her struggle with France and Napoleon to all but monopolize the woollen and cotton trades, and raised her into the greatest manufacturing country that the world had seen. To deal wisely with such a growth required a knowledge of the laws of wealth which would have been impossible at an earlier time. But it had become possible in the days of Pitt. If books are to be MODERN ENGLAND '733 measured by the effect which they have produced on the fortunes of Sec. hi mankind, the " Wealth of Nations " must rank among the greatest of books. Its author was Adam Smith, an Oxford scholar and a professor at Glasgow. Labour, he contended, was the one source of wealth, and it was by freedom of labour, by suffering the worker to pursue his own interest in his own way, that the public wealth The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 KICIIARU ARKWRIGHT. Picture hy Wright of Derby, in the possession 0/ Mr. i^. A. Hurt. would best be promoted. An)' attcmi)t to force labour into artificial channels, to shape by laws the course of commerce, to promote special branches of industry in particular countries, or to fix the character of the intercourse between one country and anotlicr, is not only a wrong to the wcH'kcr or the merchant, l)iit actual l\- hurt- ful to the wealth of a stale. The b(Jok was [jublished in 1776, at 5 1' 2 1734 Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. the opening of the American war, and studied by Pitt during his career as an undergraduate at Cambridge. From that time he owned Adam Smith for liis master. He had hardly become Minister before he took the principles of the " Wealth of Nations '' as the groundwork of his policy. The ten earlier years of his rule marked a new point of departure in English statesmanship. Pitt was the first English ^Minister who really grasped the part which industr\- was to play in promoting the welfare of the world. lie ADAM SMITH. Medallion by Tassie. was not only a peace ]\Iinister and a financier, as Walpole had been, but a statesman who saw that the best security for peace lay in the freedom and widening of commercial intercourse between nations ; that public economy not only lessened the general burdens but left additional capital in the hands of industry ; and that finance might be turned from a mere means of raising revenue into a powerful engine of political and social improvement. That little was done by Pitt himself to carry these princij^les :\[ODERX ENGLAND 1735 into effect was partly owing to the mass of ignorance and pre- judice with which he had to contend, and still more to the sudden break of his plans through the French Revolution. His power rested above all on the trading classes, and these were still per- suaded that wealth meant gold and silver, and that commerce was best furthered by jealous monopolies. It was only by patience and dexterity that the mob of merchants and country squires who backed him in the House of Commons could be brought to acquiesce in the changes he proposed. How small his power was when it struggled with the prejudices around him was seen in the failure of the first great measure he brought forward. The question of parliamentary reform which had been mooted during the American war had been steadily coming to the front. Chatham had advocated an increase of county members, who were then the most independent part of the Lower House. The Duke of Richmond talked of universal suffrage, equal electoral TOKEN OF JOHN WILKIN- SON, IRONMASTER, 1 787. JF. H. Smith, '■'■ Birniinghaiit." Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 Pitt and Reform COLLIERY. Pyne, " Microcostit," 1803 — 1806. districts, and annual Parliaments. Wilkes anticipated the Reform Bill of a later time by proposing to disfranchise the rotten boroughs, and to give members in their stead to the counties and to the more populous and wealthy towns. William I'itl had made the (jucstion 173^ The Second Pitt 17S3 TO 1793 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. Ill his own b\' brini^ing forward a motion for reform on his first entry into the House, and one of his first measures as Minister was to bring in a bill in 17S5 which, while providing for the gradual extinction of all decayed boroughs, disfranchised thirty-six at once, and transferred their members to counties. He brought the King to abstain from opposition, and strove to buy off the borough- mongers, as the holders of rotten boroughs were called, by oftcr- ing to compensate them for the seats they lost at their market value. But the bulk of his own party joined the bulk of the Whigs IRON-FOUNDRY. Pync, " lilicrocos)!!," 1803 — 1806. in a steady resistance to the bill. The more glaring abuses, indeed, within Parliament itself, the abuses which stirred Chatham and Wilkes to action, had in great part disappeared. The bribery of members had ceased. Burke's Bill of Economical Reform had just dealt a fatal blow at the influence which the King exercised by suppressing a host of useless offices, household appointments, judicial and diplomatic charges, which were maintained for the purposes of corruption. Above all, the recent triumph of public opinion to which Pitt owed his power had done much to diminish the sense of any real danger from the opposition which Parliament MODERN ENGLAND 1737 had shown till now to the voice of the nation. " Terribly dis- appointed and beat " as Wilberforce tells us Pitt was by the rejection of his measure, the temper of the House and of the people was too plain to be mistaken, and though his opinion remained unaltered, he nev'er brought it forward again. The failure of his constitutional reform was more than com- pensated by triumphs of his finance. When he entered office public credit was at its lowest ebb. The debt had been doubled by the American war, yet large sums still remained unfunded, while the revenue was reduced by a vast system of smuggling which turned cverv coast-town into a nest of robbers. The Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 Pitt's Finance CASTING CANNON BALLS. Pync, " IiIic?vcosiii," 1S03 — i8c deficienc}- was met for the moment by new taxes, but the time which was thus gained served to change the whole face of public affairs. The first of Pitt's financial measures — his plan for gradu- ally paying off the debt by a sinking fund — was undoubtcdl)^ an error ; but it had a happy effect in restoring public confidence. He met the smuggler by a reduction of Custom-duties which made his trade unprofitable. He rc\i\cd W'alpolc's plan of an ]''xci.se. Meanwhile the public expenses v.crc reduced, and commission after commission was appointed ttj introduce economy intcj ever)- department of the public service. 'I"hc rai)id dcxclopement of the national industr}- which we have alrcad)- nested no (Inubt aided the 1738 HISTORY OF THi: ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 17S3 TO 1793 success of these measures. Credit was restored. The smuggling trade was greatly reduced. In two years there was a surplus of a million, antl though dut}- after duty was removed the revenue rose steadily with every remission of taxation. Meanwhile Pitt was showing the political value of the new finance in a wider field. Ireland, then as now, was England's difficulty. The tyrannous misgovernmcnt under which she had groaned ever since the battle of the Boyne was producing its natural fruit ; the miserable land was torn with political faction, religious feuds and peasant con- THE LINEN IFAI.I., DUBLIN. From an engraving by 0^- Hincks, 1783. spiracies ; and so threatening had the attitude of the Protestant part)' which ruled it become during the American war that they had forced the English Parliament to relinquish its control over their Parliament in Dublin. Pitt saw that much at least of the misery and disloyalty of Ireland sprang from its poverty. The population had grown rapidly while culture remained stationary and commerce perished. And of this poverty much was the direct result of unjust law. Ireland was a grazing country, but to protect the interest of English graziers the import of its cattle into England was forbidden. To protect the interests of English MODERN ENGLAND 1739 clothiers and weavers, its manufactures were loaded with duties. To redress this wrong was the first financial effort of Pitt, and the bill which he introduced in 1785 did away with every obstacle to freedom of trade between England and Ireland. It was a measure which, as he held, would "draw what remained of the shattered empire together," and repair in part the loss of America by creating a loyal and prosperous Ireland ; and struggling almost Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 17S3 TO 1793 BAS-RELTEF COMMEMORATING TREATY BETWEEN ENGLAND AND FRANCE, 1787. li^edg^vood ; modelled by Flax titan. alone in face of a fierce opposition from the Whigs and the Manchester merchants, he dragged it through the English Parlia- ment, only to sec amendments forced into it which ensured its rejection by the Irish Parliament. But the defeat onl}' s[)urrcd him to a greater effort elsewhere. PVance had been looked upon as England's natural enemy ; but in 1787 he concluded a Treaty of Commerce with P'rancc which enabled the subjects of both countries to reside and travel in cither without license or passport. I740 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. Ill did away with all prohibition of trade on either side, and reduced thk everx' import dut\-. Secont ' ' i''TT India owes to Pitt's triumph a form of government which to"* remained unchanged to our own da)'. The India Bill which he --■^ carried in 1784 preserved in appearance the political and com- The Trial of mcrcial powers of the Directors, while establishing a Board of Hastings (;;ontrol, formed from members of the I'rivy Council, for the approval or annulling of their acts. Practically, however, the powers of the Board of Directors were absorbed by a secret com- mittee of three elected members of that body, to whom all the more important administrative functions had been reserved by the bill, while those of the Board of Control were virtually exercised by its President. As the President was in effect a new Secretary of State for the Indian Department, and became an important member of each Ministry, responsible like his fcllow-mcmbcrs for his action to Parliament, the administration of India was thus made a part of the general system of the English Government ; while the secret committee supplied the experience of Indian affairs in which the Minister might be deficient. Meanwhile the new temper that was growing up in the English people told on the attitude of England towards its great dependency. Discussions over ri\al plans of Indian administration diffused a sense of national responsibility for its good government, and there was a general resolve that the security against injustice and misrule which was enjoyed by the poorest Englishman should be enjoyed b\- the poorest Hindoo. This resolve expressed itself in the trial of Warren Hastings. Hastings returned from India at the close of the war with the hope of rewards as great as those of Clive. He had saved all that Clive had won. He had laid the foundation of a vast empire in the East. He had shown rare powers of administration, and the foresight, courage, and temperance which mark the born ruler of men. But the wisdom and glory of his rule could not hide its terrible ruthlessness. He was charged with having sold for a vast sum the services of British troops to crush the free tribes of the Rohillas, with having wrung half a million by extortion from the Rajah of Benares, with having extorted by torture and starvation more than a million from the Princesses of Oudh. He was accused of having kept his hold upon power by MODERN ENGLAND 1741 measures as unscrupulous, and with having murdered a native who opposed him by an abuse of the forms of English law. On almost all these charges the cooler judgement of later enquirers has acquitted Warren Hastings of guilt. Personally there can be little doubt that he had done much to secure to the new subjects of Britain a just and peaceable government. What was hardest and most pitiless in his rule had been simpl)- a carrying out of the system of administration which was native to India and which he found exist- ing there. But such a system was alien from the newhumanity of Eng- lishmen ; and few dared to vindicate Hastings when Burke in words of passionate earnestness moved for his impeach- ment. The great trial lingered on for years, and in the long run Hastings secured an acquittal. But the end at which the im- peachment aimed had really been won. The attention, the sympathy of Englishmen had been drawn across distant seas to a race utterly strange to them ; and the peas- ant of Cornwall or Cumberland had learned how to thrill at the suffering of a peasant of Bengal. Even while the trial was going on a yet wider extension of English sympathy made it.self felt. In the year which followed the adoption of free trade with France the new philanthropy alhVcl itself with the religious movement created by the Wcslc\'s in an attack on the Slave Trade. One of the profits which I'jigland bought b\' the triumphs of Marlborough was a right to ,1 niono])oly FOURTKEN STARS TAVKRX, BKISTuL. Old drawing in British Muscuiii. Sec. Ill The Seco.nd Pitt 1783 TO 1793 The Slave Trade 1742 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 England and Europe of the slave trade between Africa and the Spanish dominions ; and it was England that had planted slavery in her American colonies and her West Indian islands. But the horrors and iniquit)- of the trade, the ruin and degradation of Africa which it brought about, the oppression of the negro himself, were now felt widely and deeply. " After a con- versation in the open air at the root of an old tree, just above the steep descent into the Vale of Keston," with the younger Pitt, his friend, William Wilber- forcc, whose position as a representative of the evangelical party gave weight to his advocacy of such a cause, resolved in 1788 to bring in a bill for the abolition of the slave trade. But the bill fell before the opposi- tion of the Liverpool slave merchants and the general indifference of the House of Commons. The spirit of humanity which breathed through Pitt's policy had indeed to wrestle with diffi- culties at home and abroad ; and his efforts to sap the enmity of nation against nation by a freer intercourse encountered a foe even more fatal than English prejudice, in the very movement of which his measures formed a part. Across the Channel this movement was growing into a revolution which was to change the face of the world. So far as England was concerned the Puritan resistance of the seventeenth century had in the end succeeded in cliecking the 'ii^j WILLIAM AVILBERFORCE. Monument in ll-'estiiiiustcr Abbey. MODERN ENGLAND 174: THE FRurr-HAi;i.< 1 After H. Walton. general tendency of the time to religious and poli- tical despotism. Since the Revolution of 1688 free- dom of conscience and the people's right to govern itself through its representatives in Parlia- ment had been practicall}- established. Social equal- ity had begun long before. Every man from the high- est to the lowest was sub- ject to, and protected by, the same law. The Eng- lish aristocrac}', though exercising a powerful influence on government, were possessed of few social privileges, and prevented from forming a separate class in the nation by the legal and social tradition which counted all save the eld- est son of a noble house as commoners. No im- passable line parted the gentry from the commer- cial classes, and these again possessed no privi- leges which could part them from the lower classes of the community. Public opinion, the general sense of educated English- men, had established itself after a short struggle as the dominant element in English government. lUit in all the (;thcr great slates of Eurf>pe the wars of religion had left only the name of freedom. Government tended to a pure despotism. Privilege was sujiremc "Old Chairs to menJ." XVIicatley, ^^ Itinctitnt Trades 0/ London, I794-5. " Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 1744 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. in The Seconh Pitt 1783 TO 1793 Miawiierries, sc.irlet strawberries Wheatley' s "•Trades." in rcliy;i()n, in politics, in society. Socict}' itself rested on a rigid division of classes from one another, which refused to tlie i)eople at lari^^e an}' equal rights of justice or of industry. We have al- ready seen how alien such a conception of national life was from the ideas which the wide diffusion of intelligence during the eighteenth century was spreading throughout Europe ; and in almost every country some enlightened rulers endeavoured by adminis- trative reforms in some sort to satisfy the sense of wrong which was felt around them. The attempts of sovereigns like Frederick the Great in Prussia, and Joseph the Second in Austria and the Nether- lands, were rivalled by the efforts of statesmen such as Turgot in France. It was in France indeed that the contrast between the actual state of society and the new ideas of public right was felt most keenly. Nowhere had the victory of the Crown been more complete. The aris- tocracy had been robbed of all share in public affairs ; it enjoyed social privileges and exemption from any contribution to the public burdens, without that sense of public duty which a governing class to some degree always MODERN ENGLAND 745 'Sweet China ciranges.'' IVheatley s " Trades." possesses. Guilds and monopolies fettered the industry of the trader and the merchant, and cut them off from the working classes, as the value at- tached to noble blood cut off both from the aris- tocrac}'. If its political position indeed were compared with that of most of the countries round it, France stood high. Its govern- ment was less oppressive, its general wealth was larger and more evenly diffused, there was a better administration of justice, and greater security for public order. Poor as its peasantry seemed to English eyes, they were far above the peasants of Germany or Spain. Its middle class was the quickest and most intelligent in Europe. Under Lewis the Fifteenth opinion was practically free ; and a literary class had sprung up which devoted itself with wonderful brilliancy and activity to populariz- ing the ideas of social and political justice which it learned from English writers, and in the case of Montesquieu and Vol- taire from personal con- tact with English life. The moral conceptions of the time, its Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 State of France Knives, scissors anJ razors to grind." Wheatlcy s " J'nit/cs." 1746 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. Ill The Secono Pitt 1783 TO 1793 love of mankind, its sense of human brotherhood, its hatred of oppression, its pity for the guilty and the poor, its longing after a higher and nobler standard of life and ac- tion, were expressed b}' a crowd of writers, and above all b\- Rousseau, with a fire and eloquence which carried them to the heart of the people. But this new force of intelligence only jostled rough!}' with the social forms with which it found itself in contact. The philosopher denounced the tyranny " il I -1 ice gingerbread, smoaking hot." M'luatleys " Tnuh-s.' Public opinion forced France to ally new love song, only hi. apiece." Wheatleys " Trades." of the priesthood. The peasant grumbled at the lord's right to judge him in his courts and to ex- act feudal services from him. The merchant was galled b}- the trading re- strictions and the heavy taxation. The country gentry rebelled against their exclusion from pub- lic life and from the go\-crnment of the coun- tr\-. Its powerlessness to bring about an\- change at home turned all this new energy into sym- pathy with a struggle against t}-rann\- abroad. itself with America in its MODERN ENGLAND 1747 contest for liberty, and French volunteers under the Marquis de Lafayette joined Washington's army. But while the American war spread more widely throughout the nation the craving for freedom, it brought on the Government financial embarrassment from which it could only free itself by an appeal to the country at large. Lewis the Sixteenth resolved to summon the States- General, which had not met since the time of Richelieu, and to appeal to the nobles to waive their immunity from taxation. His resolve at once stirred into vigorous life every impulse and desire Sec. hi The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 MEDAL COMMEMOKATINl; THE TAKING OF THE BASTILLE. which had been seething in the minds of the people ; and the States-General no sooner met at Versailles in May 1789 than the fabric of despotism and privilege began to crumble. A rising in Paris destroyed the Bastille, and the capture of this fortress was taken for the sign of a new aera of constitutional freedom in I''rance and through Europe. Even in luigland men thrilled with a strange joy at the tidings of its fall. " flow much is this the greatest event that ever happened in tlie uoild." l''ox cried with a burst of enthusiasm, " and how much the best ! " \'(>u. IV— Takt 3.S 5 [' 1748 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. Ill The Second Pitt 1738 TO 1793 Pitt and Russia League against Russia Pitt regarded the approacli of France to sentiments of liberty which had long been familiar to England with greater coolness, but with no distrust. I'^or the moment indeed his attention was distracted by an attack of madness which visited the King in 1788, and by the claim of a right to the Regency which was at once advanced b\- the Prince of Wales. The Prince belonged to the Whig part}' ; and I"ox, who was travelling in Italy, hurried home to support his claim, in full belief that the Prince's Regency would be followed by his own return to power. Pitt successfully resisted it on the constitutional ground that in such a case the right to choose a temporary regent, under what limitations it would, lay with Parliament ; and a bill which conferred the Regency on the Prince, in accordance with this viev/, was already passing the Houses when the recovery of the King put an end to the long dispute. Foreign difficulties, too, absorbed Pitt's attention. Russia had risen into greatness under Catherine the_ Second ; and Catherine had resolved from the first on the annexation of Poland, the expulsion of the Turks from Europe, and the setting up of a Russian throne at Constantinople. In her first aim she was baffled for the moment by Frederick the Great. She had already made herself virtually mistress of the whole of Poland, her armies occupied the kingdom, and she had seated a nominee of her own on its throne, when P'rederick in union with the Emperor Joseph the Second forced her to admit Germany to a share of the spoil. If the Polish partition of 1773 brought the Russian frontier west- ward to the upper waters of the Dwina and the Dnieper, it gave Galicia to Maria Theresa, and West Prussia to Frederick himself. Foiled in her first aim, she waited for the realization of her second till the alliance between the two German powers was at an end through the resistance of Prussia to Joseph's schemes for the annexation of Bavaria, and till the death of Frederick removed her most watchful foe. Then in 1788 Joseph and the Em.press joined hands for a partition of the Turkish Empire. Put Prussia was still watchful, and England was no longer fettered as in 1773 by troubles with America. The friendship established by Chatham between the two countries, which had been suspended by Bute's treachery and all but destroyed during the Northern League of Neutral Powers, had been restored by Pitt through his co-operation MODERN ENGLAND ^749 with Frederick's successor in the restoration of the Dutch Stat- holderate. Its pohtical weight was now seen in an alliance of England, Prussia, and Holland in 1789 for the preservation of the Turkish Empire. A great European struggle seemed at hand ; and in such a struggle the sympathy and aid of France was of the highest importance. But with the treaty the danger passed away. In the spring of 1790 Joseph died broken-hearted at the failure of his plans and the revolt of the Netherlands against his in- novations ; and Austria practically withdrew from the war with the Turks. Meanwhile in France things moved fast. By breaking down the division between its separate orders the States-General became Sec. Ill The Seco.nd Pitt 1783 TO 1793 Pitt and France MEDAL COMMEMORATING THE RETURN OF THE KING TO I'ARI.S, lySQ. a National xVssembly, which abolished the privileges of the provincial parliaments, of the nobles, and the Church. In October the mob of Paris marched on Versailles and forced the King to return with them to the capital ; and a Constitution hastily put together was accepted by Lewis the Sixteenth in the stead of his old despotic power. To I'ilt liic tumult and disorder with which these great changes were wrought seemed transient matters, in 5 L' - HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. The Second Pitt 1783 TO 1793 Sec. Ill January 1790 he still believed that ''the present convulsions in France must sooner or later culminate in i^eneral harmony and regular order," and that when her own freedom was established, " France would stand forth as one of the most brilliant powers of Furope." But the coolness and good-will with which Pitt looked on the Revolution was far from being universal in the nation at England large. The cautious good sense of the l)ulk of Fnglishmen, their aud the ^ *= . . . Rrt'ohi. love of order and law, their distaste for violent changes and for abstract theories, as well as their reverence for the past, were fast MEDAI, COMMEMORATING THE "GENERAL CONFEDERATION," I79O. rousing throughout the countr}- a dislike of the revolutionary changes which were hurrying on across the Channel ; and both the political sense and the political prejudice of the nation were being fired by the warnings of Edmund Burke. The fall of the Bastille, though it kindled enthusiasm in Fox, roused in Burke only distrust. " Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice," he wrote a few weeks later, " neither is safe." The night of the fourth of August, when the privileges of every class were abolished, filled him with horror. He saw, and rightly saw, in it the critical moment which re\ealcd the character of the Revolution, MODERN ENGLAND and his part was taken at once. " The French," he cried in Sec hi January, while Pitt was foretelHnsr a srlorious future for the new ^the J ■/ ^ s> t> Second Constitution, " the French have shown themselves the ablest ^''^'^ 1783 architects of ruin who have hitherto existed in the world. In a to 1793 short space of time they have pulled to the ground their army, — their navy, their commerce, their arts and their manufactures." But in Parliament Burke stood alone. The Whigs, though distrustfully, followed Fox in his applause of the Revolution. The Tories, yet more distrustfully, followed Pitt ; and Pitt warmly expressed his sympathy with the constitutional government which was ruling France. At this moment indeed the revolutionary party gave a signal proof of its friendship for England. Irritated by an English settlement at Nootka Sound in California, Spain Nootka appealed to France for aid in accordance with the Family '^ Compact : and the French ]\Iinistr}-, with a part)' at its back which believed things had gone far enough, resolved on a war as the best means of checking the progress of the Revolution and restoring the power of the Crown. The revolutionary party naturally opposed this design ; after a bitter struggle the right of declaring war, save with the sanction of the Assembly, was taken from the King ; and all danger of hostilities passed awa\-. " The French Government," Pitt asserted, " was bent on cultivating the most unbounded friendship for Great Britain," and he saw no reason in its revolutionary changes why Britain should not return the friendship of P"rance. He was convinced that nothing but the joint action of France and England would in the end arrest the troubles of Eastern Europe. His intervention foiled for the moment a fresh effort of Prussia to rob Poland of Dantzig and Thorn, \^ut though Russia was still pressing Turkey hard, a Russian war was so unpopular in England that a hostile vote in Parliament forced Pitt to discontinue his armaments ; and a fresh union of Austria and Prussia, which promised at this juncture to bring about a close of the Turkish struggle, promised also a fresh attack on the indcj)endencc of Poland. liut while Pitt was pleading for friendship between the two Burke countries, I^urke was resolved to make friendship impossible. lie r"vo1u^ had long ceased, indeed, to have an)- hold owr the llousi' of *'0" Commons. The clo(iucncc which had \ icd with that of Chatham 1752 HISTORY OF THE 1:NGLISH PEOPLE chap. 1783 TO 1793 Sec. Ill during the discussions on the Stamp Act had become distasteful Thk to the bulk of its members. The length of his speeches, the Second P'TT ])rofound and philosophical character of his argument, the splendour and often the extravagance of his illustrations, his passionate earnestness, his want of temper and discretion, wearied and perplexed the squires and merchants about him. He was known at last as "the dinner-bell of the House," so rapidl}- did its benches thin at his rising. For a time his energies found scope in the impeachment of Hastings ; and the grandeur of his appeals to the iusticc of luigkmd hushed detraction. Ikit with the close of the impeachment his rcinitc had again fallen ; and the approach of old age, for he was now past sixty, seemed to counsel retire- ment from an assembly where he stood unpopular and alone. But age and disappointment and loneliness were all forgotten as Burke saw rising across the Channel the embodiment of all that he hated — a Revolution founded on scorn of the past, and threatening with ruin the whole social fabric \\hich the past had reared ; the ordered structure of classes and ranks crumbling before a doctrine of social equality ; a State rudeh' demolished and reconstituted ; a Church and a Nobility swept away in a night. Against the enthusiasm of what he rightly saw to be a new political religion he resolved to rouse the enthusiasm of the old. He was at once a great orator and a great writer ; and now that the House was deaf to his voice, he appealed to the countr}- by his pen. The " Reflections on the P'rench Rcxolution " which he published in October 1790 not only denounced the acts of rashness and violence which sullied the great change that France had wrought, but the ver}- principles from which the change had sprung. Burke's deep sense of the need of social order, of the value of that continuit}- in human affairs " without which men would become like flies in a summer," blinded him to all but the faith in mere rebellion, and the )-et sillier faith in mere novelty, which disguised a real nobleness of aim and temper even in the most ardent of the revolutionists. He would sec no abuses in the past, now that it had fallen, or an}-thing but the ruin of societ\' in the future. He preached a crusade against men \\hom he regarded as the foes of religion and civilization., and called on the armies of Furope to put do\\n MODERN ENGLAND 1753 a Revolution whose principles threatened every state with Sec. hi destruction. „the Second The crreat obstacle to such a crusade was Pitt : and one of the ^'l^ 1783 grandest outbursts of the " Reflections " closed with a bitter taunt to . 1793 at the Minister's policv. "The ag-e of chivalry," Burke cried, "is — gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded, and the and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever." But neither J^^ taunt nor invective moved Pitt from his course. At the moment when the " Reflections " appeared he gave a fresh assurance to France of his resolve to have nothing to do with any crusade against the Revolution. " This country," he wrote, " means to persevere in the neutrality hitherto scrupulously observed with respect to the internal dissensions of France ; and from which it will never depart unless the conduct held there makes it indis- pensable as an act of self-defence." So far indeed was he from sharing the reactionary panic which was spreading around him that he chose this time for supporting Fox in his Libel Act, a measure which, by transferring the decision on what was libellous in any publication from the judge to the jury, completed the freedom of the press ; and himself passed a Bill which, though little noticed among the storms of the time, was one of the noblest of his achievements. He boldly put aside the dread which had Constitu- been roused by the American war, that the gift of self-govern- „i!fj,\ ,„ ment to our colonies would serve only as a step towards their Canada secession from the mother-country, and established a House of ' Assembly and a Council in the two Canadas. " I am convinced," said Fox (who, however, differed from Pitt as to the nature of the Constitution to be given to Canada), " that the only method of retaining distant colonies with advantage is to enable them to govern themselves ; " and the policy of the one statesman and the foresight of the other have been justified by the later history of our dependencies. Nor had Burke better success with his own party. P'ox remained an ardent lover of the Revolution, and answered a fresh attack of Burke upon it with more than usual warmth. A close affection had bound till now the two men together ; but the fanaticism of liurke declared it at an end. "There is no loss of friendship,' Fox exclaimed, with a siuUlrn burst of tears. "There is!" Ikukc rci)calccl. " I know the price T/i<' Trt-e ofJ.mi'JU'l'. - » iv///, l//r JJn/'/ /ai//'/i/i,>Jo/7/t7iu// Satire on fox and the Rawlution, by J. Gillray. CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1755 of my conduct. Our friendship is at an end." Within the walls of Sec. hi Parliament Burke stood utterly alone. His "Appeal from the 'i^ ^ ^ SfCOND Aew to the Old Whigs." in June 1791, failed to detach a follower f'"" from Fox. Pitt coldl\- counselled him rather to praise the English *lo^ Constitution than to rail at the French. " I have made man\' ^~ enemies and few friends," Burke wrote sadly to the French princes who had fled from their countr\- and were gathering in arms at Coblentz, " by the part I have taken." But the opinion of the people was slowly drifting to his side. A sale of thirt\- Burkes thousand copies showed that the " Reflections " echoed the ■^•uTthe general sentiment of Englishmen. The mood of England indeed '<"""''':'' at this moment was unfavourable to any fair appreciation of the Revolution across the Channel. Her temper was above all industrial. Men who were working hard and fast growing rich, who had the narrow and practical turn of men of business, looked angrily at this sudden disturbance of order, this restless and vague activity, the.se rhetorical appeals to human feeling, these abstract and often empt}^ theories. In England it was a time of political content and social well-being, of steady economic progress, and of a powerful religious revival ; and an insular lack of imaginative interest in other races hindered men from seeing that every element of this content, of this order, of this peaceful and harmonious progress, of this reconciliation of society and religion was wanting abroad. The sympathy which the Revolu- tion had roused at first among Englishmen died awa\- before the violence of its legislative changes, and the growing anarch}- of the countr\'. S\'mpathy in fact was soon limited to a 'icw groups of reformers who gathered in " Constitutional Clubs," and whose reckless language quickened the national reaction. l^ut in spite of Burke's appeals and the cries of the nobles who had fled from France and longed only to march against their countr\-, l^urope held back from war, and Pitt preserved his attitude of neutralit}-, though with a greater appearance c)f reser\c. So anxious, in fact, did the aspect of affairs in the ICast ma]-»'icc eight)" thousand men under the Duke of Brunswick, and advanced slowly in August on thc Mcuse. France, though she had forced 1792 on thc struggle, was really almost defenceless ; her forces in Belgium broke at the first shock of arms into shameful rout ; and thc panic spreading from the army to the nation at large, took violent and horrible forms. At thc first news of lirunswick's advance thc mob of j'aris broke into the Tuilerics on the iolh ol H CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1759 Pitt 1783 TO 1793 August ; and at its demand Lewis, wiio had taken refuge in the Sec. hi Assembh", was suspended from his office and imprisoned in the '^he '■ '■ Second Temple. In September, while General Dumouriez by boldness and adroit negotiations arrested the progress of the allies m the defiles of the Argonne, bodies of paid murderers butchered the royalist prisoners who crowded the gaols of Paris, with a view of influencing the elections to a new Convention which met to proclaim the abolition of royalty. The retreat of the Prussian army, whose numbers had been reduced by disease till an advance on Paris became impossible, and a brilliant victory won by Dumouriez at Jemappes which laid the Netherlands at his feet, turned the panic of the French into a wild self-confidence. In November the Convention decreed that France offered the aid of her soldiers to all nations who would strive for freedom. " All Governments are our enemies," said its President ; " all peoples are our allies." In .the teeth of treaties signed only two years before, and of the stipulation made by England when it pledged itself to neutralit}-, the French Government resolved to attack Holland, and ordered its generals to enforce b\- arms the opening of the Scheldt. To do this was to force England into war. Public opinion was France pressing harder day by day upon Pitt. The horror of the war on massacres of September, the hideous despotism of the Parisian "^ ^" mob, had done more to estrange England from the Revolution than all the eloquence of Burke. But even while withdrawing our Minister from Paris on the imprisonment of the King, Pitt clung stubbornly to the hope of peace. His hope was to bring the war to an end through English mediation, and to "leave France, which I believe is the best way, to arrange its own internal affairs as it can." No hour of Pitt's life is so great as the hour when he stood alone in England, and refused to bow to the growing cry of the nation for war. Even the news of the September massacres could only force from him a hope that France might abstain from any war of conquest, and escape from its social anarchy. In October the PVench agent in P^ngland reported that Pitt was about to recognize the Republic. At the opening of November he still pressed on Holland a stead)- ncutralit\-. It was I'rancc, and not England, which at last wrenched from his grasp the ])cact- lo r ^immmmmmmtf^ PROCLAMATION D U CONSEIL EXECUTIF P R O V I S O I R E. ExTRAlT des Regiftres du Confeil, du 20 Janvier i y p ^ , tan fecond de la Republ'ique. L ^ Coiifcil exicuiif jwoviroire d^lib^rant fur ics mcfurcs 4 prendre pour rexttuiion du dtcret dc U Canvcnuw. nationalc , dcs ij. 17. ip & ao Janvier >79}> amke les difpoHtiuns fuivontcs : I * L'3 iM.ACAKU OF ORDER FOR TIIK EXECUTION OF LOUIS XVI. Miis^e Cainavalet-, Paris, MODERN ENGLAND 1761 which he clung so desperately. The decree of the Convention and the attack on the Dutch left him no choice but war. for it was impossible for England to endure a French fleet at Antwerp, or to desert allies like the United Provinces. But even in December the news of the approaching partition of Poland nerved him to a last struggle for peace ; he offered to aid Austria in acquiring Bavaria if she would make terms with France, and pledged him- self to France to abstain from war if that power would cease from violating the independence of her neighbour states. But across the Channel his moderation was only taken for fear, while in England the general mourning which followed on the news of the French King's execution showed the growing ardour for the contest. The rejection of his last offers indeed made a contest inevitable. Both sides ceased from diplomatic communications, and in February, 1793, France issued her Declaration of War. The Second Pitt 1783 ro 1793 llfe-^ FKli.NCH SAlIur. ON GEORGE III. AND PITT. liibliotkcqiic Nationale, Paris. HORATIO NELSON. Portrait by J. Ilojypner, in St. James's Palace. CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1763 Section IV. — The War with France, 1793 — 1815 \^Ai(thorities.~'Yo those mentioned before we may add Moore's Life of Sheridan ; the Lives of Lord Castlereagh, Lord Eldon, and Lord Sidmouth ; Romillys Memoirs ; Lord Cornwallis's Correspondence ; Mr. Yonge's Life of Lord Liverpool ; the Diaries and Correspondence of Lord Mahnesbury, Lord Colchester, and Lord Auckland. For the general history of England at this time, see Alison's "History of Europe ; " for its military history, Sir William Napier's " History of the Peninsular War.'"] From the moment when France declared war against England Pitt's power was at an end. His pride, his immoveable firmness, and the general confidence of the nation still kept him at the head of affairs ; but he could do little save drift along with a tide of popular feeling which he never fully understood. The very excellences of his character unfitted him for the conduct of a war. He was in fact a Peace Minister, forced into war b}- a panic and enthusi- asm which he shared in a very small degree, and unaided by his father's gift of at once entering into the sympathies and passions around him, and of rousing pas- sions and sympathies in return. Around him the country broke out in a fit of frenzy and alarm which rivalled the pas- sion and panic over-sea. The confidence of France in its illusions as to opinion in England deluded for the moment even Englishmen themselves. The partisans of Republicanism were in reality but a few handfuls of men who played at gathering Conventions, and at calling themselves citizens and patriots, in childish imitation of what was going on across the Channel. But in the mass of Englishmen the dread of revolution passed for the hour into sheer panic. Even the bulk of the Whig party forsook Fox when he still proclaimed his faith in I'Vance and the Revolution. The " Old Whigs," as the)' called themsehcs, with the Duke of Portland, Earls S])encer and ]"'it/.\villiaiii, aiui Vol. IV— Part 38 5 .\ Sec. IV The War with France ENGLISH SAn,OR, 1 779. Contemporary Print. 1793 TO I815 Pitt and the War The pa n ic 1764 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. 1Y The War with Fraw.cp ,1793 TO 1815 Mr. Windham at their head, followed Iknkc in giving their adhesion to the Government. Pitt himself, though little touched b}- the political reaction around him, was shaken by the dream of social danger, and believed in the existence of " thousands of bandits," who were ready to rise against the throne, to plunder every landlord, and to sack London. " Paine is no fool," he said to his niece, who quoted to him a passage from the " Rights of Man," in which that author had vindicated the principles of the Revolution ; " he is perhaps right ; but if I did what he wants, I should have thousands of bandits on my hands to-morrow, and Results of the panic London burnt." It was this sense of social danger which alone reconciled him to the war. Bitter as the need of the struggle which was forced upon England was to him, he accepted it with the less reluctance that war, as he trusted, would check the progress of "French principles" in England itself. The worst issue of this panic was the series of legislative measures in which it found expression. The Habeas Corpus Act was suspended, a bill against seditious assemblies restricted the liberty of public meeting and a wider scope was given to the Statute of Treasons. Prosecution after prosecution was directed against the Press ; the sermons of some dissenting ministers were indicted as seditious ; MODERN ENGLAND 1765 and the conventions of sympathizers with France were roughly broken up. The worst excesses of the panic were witnessed in Scotland, where )^oung Whigs, whose only offence was an advocacy of Parliamentary reform, were sentenced to trans- portation, and where a brutal judge openly expressed his regret that the practice of torture in seditious cases should have fallen into disuse. The panic indeed soon passed away for sheer want of material to feed on. In 1794 the leaders of the Corresponding Society, a body which professed sympathy with France, were brought to trial on a charge of high treason, but their acquittal proved that all active terror was over. Save for occasional riots, to which the poor were goaded by sheer want of bread, no social disturbance trou- bled England through the twen- ty years of the war. But the blind reaction against all reform which had sprung from the panic lasted on when the panic was forgotten. . (ml 'U -" Sec. IV The Wak with France 1793 TO 1815 For nearly a quarter of a century it was hard to get a hearing for any measure which threatened change to an existing insti- tution, beneficial though the change might be. bLven the [philan- thropic movement which so nobly characteri/.ed the time found itself checked and hampered by the dread of revolution. At first indeed all seemed to go ill for r'rance. She was girt in by France a ring of enemies ; the ICmpirc, Austria, I'russia, .Sardinia, .Spain, antl coalition England were leagued in arms against her ; and their effc )rls were seconded by ci\il war. The peasants of I'oilou and I'ritanu)- rose 5 \ ^ 1766 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. IV in revolt against the government at Paris, while Marseilles and The Lyons were driven into insurrection by the violent leaders who War with -^ France ,-,Q^y seized on powcr in the cai)ital. The French armies were 1793 driven back from the Netherlands when ten thousand English 1815 soldiers, under the Duke of York, joined the Austrians in Flanders in 1793. But the chance of crushing the Revolution was lost by the greed of the two German powers. Russia, as Pitt had foreseen, was now free to carry out her schemes in the East ; and Austria and Prussia saw themselves forced, in the interest of a balance of power, to share in her annexations at the cost of Poland. But NAPOLEON BUNAl'ARTK. From an engraving by Fiesinger of a picture by Cuerin. this new division of Poland would have become impossible had France been enabled by a restoration of its monarchy to take up again its natural position in Europe, and to accept the alliance which Pitt would in such a case have offered her. The polic\' of the German courts therefore was to prolong an anarchy which left them free for the moment to crush Poland : and the allied armies which might have marched upon Paris were purposel}' frittered away in sieges in the Netherlands and the Rhine. Such a policy gave PVance time to recover from the shock of her X MODERN ENGLAND 1767 disasters. Whatever were the crimes and tyranny of her leaders, sec. iv France felt in spite of them the value of the Revolution, and The War with rallied enthusiastically to its support. The revolts in the West France 1793 and South were crushed. The Spanish invaders were held at bay to at the foot of the Pyrenees, and the Piedmontese were driven from ^ Nice and Savoy. The great port of Toulon, which called for of France foreign aid against the Government of Paris, and admitted an English garrison within its walls, was driven to surrender by measures counselled by a young artillery officer from Corsica, Napoleon Buonaparte. At the opening of 1794 a victory at Fleurus which again made the French masters of the Netherlands showed that the tide had turned. F>ance was united within by the cessation of the Terror and of the tyranny of the Jacobins, while on every border victory followed the gigantic efforts with which she met the coalition against her. Spain sued for peace ; Prussia withdrew her jarmies from the Rhine ; the Sardinians were driven back from the Maritime Alps ; the Rhine provinces were wrested from the Austrians ; and before the year ended Holland was lost. Pichegru crossed the Waal in mid-winter with an over- whelming force, and the wretched remnant of ten thousand men who had followed the Duke of York to the Netherlands, thinned by disease and by the hardships of retreat, re-embarked for England. The victories of France broke up the confederacy which had Break up threatened it with destruction. The Batavian republic which coalition Pichegru had set up after his conquest of Holland was now an ally of France. Prussia bought peace by the cession of her possessions west of the Rhine. Peace with Spain followed in the summer, while Sweden and the Protestant cantons of Switzerland recognized the Republic. In P^rancc itself discord came well-nigh to an end. The fresh severities against the ultra-republicans which followed on the establishment of a Directory indicated the moderate character of the new government, and Pitt seized on this change in the temper of the French government as giving an 1795 opening for peace. Pitt him.self was sick of the strife. England had maintained indeed her naval supremacy. The triumphs of her seamen were in strange contrast with her weakness on land ; and at the outset of the contest, in 1794, the I'Vcnch fleet was defeated (^'i'i Brest by Lord I lowc in a victory which bore the f-, .i; o ^ CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1769 name of the day on which it was won, the First of June. Her Sec. iv colonial ^ains too had been considerable. Most of the West i""e \\ AR WITH Indian islands, which had been held by France, and the far more fkance 1793 valuable settlements of the Dutch, the Cape of Good Hope, to Ceylon, and the famous Spice Islands of the Malaccas and Java — had been transferred to the British Crown. But Pitt was without means of efficiently carrying on the war. The army was small and without militar}- experience, while its leaders were utterly incapable. " W'e have no General," wrote Lord Grenville, " but some old woman in a red riband." Wretched too as had been the conduct of the war, its cost was already terrible. If England was without soldiers, she had vvealth,^and Pitt had been forced to turn her wealth into an engine of war. He became the paymaster of the coalition, and his subsidies kept the allied armies in the field. But the immense loans which these called for, and the quick growth of expenditure, undid all his financial reforms. Taxation, which had reached its lowest point under Pitt's peace adminis- tration, mounted to a height undreamt of before. The public debt rose by leaps and bounds. In three }-ears nearl)- eighty millions had been added to it. But though the ruin of his financial hopes, and his keen sense Progress of the European dangers which the contest involved, made Pitt vvar earnest to close the struggle with the Revolution, he stood almost alone in his longings for peace. The nation at large was still ardent for war, and its ardour was fired by Burke in his " Letters on a Regicide Peace," the last outer}' of that fanaticism which had done so much to plunge the world in blood. Nor was P'rance less ardent for war than England. At the moment when Pitt sought 1796 to open negotiations, her victories had roused hopes of wider conquests, and though General Moreau was foiled in a march on Vienna, the wonderful successes of Napoleon Buonaparte, who now took the command of the army of the Alps, laid Piedmont at her feet. Lombard)' was soon in the hands of the P^rcnch, the Duchies south of the Po pillaged, and the Pope driven to purchase an armistice. P'resh victories enabled Buonaparte to wring a peace from Au.stria in the treaty of Campo P^ormio, which not only gave oct. 1797 P>ance the Iranian ihlands, a jjurt of the old tcrrilor}' of X'enice, as well as the Netherlands and the whole left bank of the Kliiiic, but 3 5; CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1771 united Lombardy with the Duchies south of the Po, and the Papal States as far as the Rubicon, into a " Cisalpine Republic," which was absolutely beneath her control. The withdrawal of Austria left France without an enemy on the Continent, and England without an ally. The stress of the war was pressing more heavily on her every day. The alarm of a French invasion of Ireland brought about a suspension of specie payments on the part of the Bank. A mutiny in the fleet was suppressed with difficulty. It was in this darkest hour of the struggle that Burke passed away, protesting to the last against the peace which, in spite of his previous failure, Pitt tried in 1797 to negotiate at Lille. Peace seemed more needful to him than ever ; for the naval supremacy of FLAG OF THE " NIGER " DURING MUTINY AT THE NORE. United Seniice Miiscitiit. Britain was threatened by a coalition such as had all but crushed her in the American war. Again the Dutch and Spanish fleets were allied with the fleets of France, and if they gained command of the Channel, it would enable France to send overwhelming forces in aid of the rising which was planned in Ireland. But the danger had hardly threatened when it was dispelled by two great victories. When in 1797 the Spanish fleet put out to sea, it was attacked by Admiral Jervis off Cape St. Vincent and driven back to Cadiz with the loss of four of its finest vessels ; while the Dutch fleet from the Tcxel, which was to protect a I'rench force in its descent upon Ireland, was met by a far larger fleet under Admiral Duncan, and almost annihilated in a !)att]c off Campcrdown, aftcr Sec. IV The War with France 1793 TO iSis Cape S/. I 'inceiit Fib. 14 CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1773 an obstinate struggle which showed the Hollanders still worthy sec. iv of their old renown. The ruin of its hopes in the battle of The War with Camperdown drove Ireland to a rising of despair ; but the revolt France 1793 TO 1815 er- was crushed by the defeat of the insurgents at Vinegar Hill in May, 1798, and the surrender of General Humbert, who landed in August with a French force. Of the threefold attack on which "dmJ'ti the Director}' relied, two parts had now broken down. England Oct. n still held the seas, and the insurrection in Ireland had failed. The next year saw the crowning victory of the Nile. The genius of Buonaparte had seized on the schemes for a rising in India, where Tippoo Sahib, the successor of Hyder Ali in Mysore, had vowed to drive the English from the south ; and he laid before the Directory a plan for the conquest of Egypt as a preliminary to a campaign in I / MFXH.A.MCAL TIGER MADE FOR TIPPOO SULTAN. India Museum. Southern India. In 1798 he land- ed in Egypt ; and its conquest was rapid and complete. But the thirteen men-of-war which had es- corted his expedition were found by Admiral Nelson in Aboukir Bay, moored close to the coast in a line guarded at either end by gun-boats and batteries. Nelson resolved to thrust his own ships Battle of between the French and the shore ; his flagship led the way ; and "^^^ ^ after a terrible fight of twelve hours, nine of the French vessels were 1798 captured and destroyed, two were burnt, and five thousand French .seamen were killed or made prisoners. All communication between France and Buonaparte's army was cut off; and his hopes of making Egypt a starting-point for the conquest of India fell at a blow. Freed from the dangers that threatened her rule in Ireland and The Pc3C C of in India, and mistress of the seas, England was free to attack Luneviiie France ; and in such an attack she was aided at this moment b)- the temper of the European powers, and the cea.seless aggressions of France. Russia formed a close alliance with Austria ; and it was with renewed hope that I'itt lavi.shed subsidies on the two '774 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV The War with France '793 TO 1815 allies. A union of the Russian and Austrian armies drove the rVcnch back again across the Alps and the Rhine ; but the stubborn energy of General Massena enabled his soldiers to hold their ground in Switzerland; and the attempt of a united force of Russians and English to wrest Holland from its I'rcnch masters was successfully repulsed. In the I'Last, however, England was more successful. Eoiled in his dreams of Indian conquests, Buonaparte conceived the design of the conquest of Syria, and of the creation of an army among its warlike m.ountaineers, with which he might march upon Constantinople or India at his will. But Acre, the key of Syria, was stubbornly held by the Turks, the French battering train was captured at sea by an English captain, .MEDAL COMMEMORATING BATTLE OF MARENGO. .V07>. 10, 1799 Jufie 14, 1800 Sir Sidney Smith, whose seamen aided in the defence of the place, and the besiegers were forced to fall back upon Egypt, The French general despairing of success left his army and returned to France. His arrival in Paris was soon followed by the overthrow of the Directors, Three consuls took their place ; but under the name of First Consul Buonaparte became in effect sole ruler of the country. His energy at once changed the whole face of European affairs. The offers of peace which he made to England and Austria were intended to do little more than to shake the coalition, and gain breathing time for the organization of a new force which was gathering in secrecy at Dijon, while Moreau with the army of the Rhine pushed again along the Danube. The First Consul crossed the Saint Bernard in 1800, and a victory at Marengo MODERN ENGLAND 1775 forced the Austrians to surrender Lombardy ; while a truce arrested the march of Moreau, who had captured Munich and was pushing on to Vienna. On the resumption of the war in the autumn the Austrians were driven back on Vienna ; and Moreau crushed tlicir arm}- on the Iser in the victory of Hohenhnden. In February, 1801, the Continental War was brought suddenly to an end by the Peace of Luneville. It was but a few months before the close of the war that Pitt brought about the Union of Ireland with England. The history of Ireland, during the fifty years that followed its conquest by Wil- liam the Third, is one which no Englishman can recall without shame. After the surrender of Limerick every Catholic Irishman, and there were five Irish Catholics to every Irish Protestant, was treat- ed as a stranger and a foreigner in his own country. The House of Lords, the House of Commons, the magistracy, all corporate offices in towns, all ranks in the army, the bench, the bar, the whole adminis- tration of government or justice, were closed against Catholics. The very right of voting for their repre- sentatives in Parliament was denied them. Few Catholic landowners had been left by the sweeping con- fiscations which had followed the successive revolts of the island, and oppressive laws forced even these few with scant exceptions to pro- fess Protestantism. Necessity, in- deed, had brought about a practical toleration of their religion and their worship ; but in all social and political matters the native Catholics, in other word> IIk- immense majority of the people of Ireland, were simi>l)' hewers of wood and drawers of water to their Protestant masters, who looked on them- AN nusll CUIEK. Caricature by Gillray. Sec. IV The War with Franck 1793 i«i5 Dec. 2 Ireland under the Georges CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1777 selves as mere settlers, who boasted of their Scotch or English ex- traction, and who regarded the name of " Irishman " as an insult. But small as was this Protestant body, one half of it fared little better, as far as power was concerned, than the Catholics ; for the Presbyterians, who formed the bulk of the Ulster settlers, were shut out by law from all civil, military, and municipal offices. The War with France 1793 TO 1815 JOHN rHU,l'OT CURRAN. From J. Raphael Smith's engraving of a picture hy Lawrence. The administration and justice of the country were thus kept rigidly in the hands of members of the Established Church, a botly which comprised about a twelfth of the population of the island ; while its government was practically monopolized by a few great Protestant landowners. The rotten boroughs, which had originally been created to make the Irish Parliament (lcj)endcnt on the Crown, had fallen under the influence of the adjacent landlords, who were thus masters of the House of Commons, while thr\- formed in person the House of Peers. During the first half of tlu Govern- )tu'tit in I rclaiid i77« HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP Sec. IV The War with Franck 1793 TO I815 eighteenth century two-thirds of the House of Commons, in fact, was returned b)- a small group of nobles, who were recognized as '■ parlianicntar\' undertakers," and who undertook to " manage " Parliament on their own terms. Irish politics were for these men a means of public plunder ; they were glutted with pensions, preferments, and bribes in hard cash in return for their services • HKNRY GRATTAN. Picture ly F. U'/tcatley (1782), in National Portrait Gallery. they were the ad\'iscrs of every Lord-Lieutenant, and the practical governors of the countr\-. The only check to the t}'ranny of this narrow and corrupt oligarchy was in the connexion of Ireland with England and the subordination of its Parliament to the English Privy Council. The Irish Parliament had no power of originating legislative or financial measures, and could only say "yes" or "no "to Acts submitted to it by the Privy Council in England. MODERN ENGLAND ^779 The English Parliament too claimed the right of binding Ireland as well as England by its enactments, and one of its statutes transferred the appellate jurisdiction of the Irish Peerage to the English House of Lords. But as if to compensate for the benefits of its protection, England did her best to annihilate Irish com- merce and to ruin Irish agriculture. Statutes passed b\- the jealousy of English landowners forbade the export of Irish cattle or sheep to English ports. The export of wool was forbidden, lest Sec. IV The War with Fr.^nce 1793 TO I8I5 HEN'KV FLOOD. From an engraving in Barrington's '■'■Historic Memoirs" 0/ a draiving hy Comerford. it might interfere with the profits of English wool-growers. Poverty was thus added to the curse of misgovernment ; and poverty deepened with the rapid growth of the native population, till famine turned the country into a hell. The bitter lesson of the last conquest, however, long sufficed to check all dreams of revolt among the natives, and the outbreaks which sprang from time to time out of the general miserj' and discontent were purely social in their character, and were roughly repressed by the ruling class. W'licn political revolt threatened at Vol. IV- I'ART 38 5 \' Pitt and Ireland ijiso HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV last, the threat came from the ruling class itself. At the very xi^: outset of the reign of George the Third, the Irish Parliament War with France insisted on its claim to the exclusive control of money bills, and a ''^•^ cvy was raised for the removal of the checks imposed on its x8is independence. 13ut it was not till the American war that this cry became a political danger, a danger so real that England was forced to give way. From the close of the war, when the Irish Volunteers wrung legislative independence from the Rockingham IRISH LINEN MANUFACrUKE, 1 783 : — PLOUGHING — SOWING — HARROWING. Ministry, England and Ireland were simply held together by the fact that the sovereign of the one island was also the sovereign of Independ- the Other. During the next eighteen years Ireland was " in- ^Irelcmd dependent;" but its independence was a mere name for the 1782 uncontrolled rule of a few noble families and of the Irish Executive backed by the support of the English Government. To such a length had the whole system of monopoly and patronage been carried, that at the time of the Union more than sixty seats were in the hands of three families alone, those of the Hills, the Ponsonbys, and the Beresfords ; while the dominant influence in MODERN ENCxLAND the Parliament now lay with the Treasury boroughs at the disposal of the Government. The victor}' of the Volunteers immediately produced measures in favour of the Catholics and Presbyterians. The Volunteers had already in 1780 won for the Presbyterians, who formed a good half of their force, full political liberty by the abolition of the Sacramental Test ; and the Irish Parliament of 1782 removed at once the last grievances of the Protestant Dissenters. The Catholics were rewarded for their aid by the repeal of the more grossly oppressiv^c enactments of the 1781 The Wak with Vrasck 1793 PULLING FLAX — STOCKING —RIPLI.NG — BOGGING. penal laws. Hut when (irattan, supported b)' tlie bulk of the Irish party, pleaded for Parliamentary reform, and for the grant of equal rights to the Catholics, he was utterl}' foiled by the small group of borough owners, who chiefly controlled the Government and the Parliament. The ruling class found government to<:> profitable to share it with other possessors. It was only b}- hard bribery that the English Viceroys could secure their co-operation in the simplest measures of administration. " If e\er there was a country unfit to govern itself," said Lord Hutchinson, "it is Ireland. A corrujjt aristocrac)', a ferocious coinmonaU)', a 5 ^■ ^ 1782 HISTORY 01" THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV distracted Go\-crnmcnt, a (1i\-idcd people ! " In Pitt's eyes the ,.. 1'"' tlansjcr of Ireland la\- abo\c all in the miscrx' of its people. vV AR WITH '^ - ^ 1 r Franxe Aithouij-h the Irish ('atholics were held down b\' the brute force of '"93 . . . ' their Protestant rulers, he saw that their discontent was i^rowing 1S15 f.ist into rebellion, and that one secret of their discontent at any rate hi}- in Irish poverty, a poverty increased if not originally brought about 1)\- the jealous e.\clusi(Mi of Irish products from their natural markets in iMigland itself In 1779 Ireland had won from Lord TAKING FLA.X OUT OF BOG — SPREADING TO DRY— STORING — IfEETLING — BREAKING. North large measures of free-trade abroad ; but the heavy duties laid by the luiglish Parliament on all Irish manufactures .save linen and woollen }'arn still shut them out of England. One of 17S5 Pitt's fir.st commercial measures aimed at putting an end to this exclusion by a bill which established freedom of trade between the two islands. His first proposals were accepted in the Irish Parliament ; but the fears and jealousies of the English farmers and manufacturers forced into the Bill amendments which gave to the British Parliament powers over Irish navigation and commerce, thus over-riding their newly-won independence, and MODERN ENGLAND 17SC the measure in its new form was rejected in Ireland. The outbreak of the revolutionary struggle, and the efforts which the French revolutionists at once made to excite rebellion amongst the Irish, roused Pitt to fresh measures of conciliation and good government. In 1793 he forced the Irish Administration to abandon a re- sistance which had wrecked his projects the previous year ; and the Irish Parliament passed without opposition mca.surcs for the admission of Catholics to the electoral franchise, and to civil and military office within the island, which promised to open a new era Sec. IV The War with Franck 1793 ro 1815 BUTLING — SCUrCHI.NG — II.VCKLI.XG. of religious liberty. Ikit the promise came too late. The hope of conciliation was lost in the fast rising tide of religious and social passion. The Society of " United Irishmen," which was founded in 1791 at Belfast by Wolfe Tone with a view of forming a union between Protestants and Catholics to win Parliaincntar\- icform, drifted into a corresprjiidcncc witli l*"rancc and projects of insur- rection. The peasantry, brooding over their misery and their wrongs, were equally stirred by the news from I'rance ; and their discontent broke out in outrages of secret societies which spread panic among the ruling classes. The nn'serv was increased by 17S4 HlS'l'OKV OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV The War with Franci. 1793 KS'1'5 The Union faction fights between the Protestants and Catholics, which had alread}- broken out before the French Revolution. The Catholics banded themselves together as " Defenders " against the outrages of the " Pecp-o'-da}- l^oys," who were inainl)' drawn from the more \-iolent Presbx'tcrians ; and these factions became later merged in the larger associations of the "United Irishmen" and the " Orange-men." At last the smouldering discontent and disaffection burst into flame. The panic roused in 1796 b)- an attempted French HKEAKING AND yCUTCHI.NG BV MACIIINERV. invasion under Ilochc woke passions of cruelt}- and t\-rann}- whicli turned Ireland into a licll. Soldiers and )-eomanr\' marched o\cr the countr}- torturing and scourging the " croppies," as the Irish peasantr}- were called in derision from their short-cut hair, robbing, ravishing, and murdering. Their outrages were sanctioned b}- the landowners who formed the Irish Parliament in a Bill of Indemnity, and protected for the future b)- an Insurrection Act. Meanwhile the United Irishmen prepared for an insurrection, which was delayed b}- the failure of the French expeditions MODERN ENGLAND 17S5 on which the\- counted for support, and above all by the victory of Sec. iv Camperdown. Atrocities were answered by atrocities when the revolt at last broke out in 1798. Loyalists were lashed and tortured in their turn, and every soldier taken was butchered without merc}'. The rebels however no sooner mustered fourteen thousand men strong in a camp on Vinegar Hill, near Enniscorthy. than the camp was stormed by the English troops, and the revolt utterly suppressed. The suppression came onl\- just in time to prevent greater disasters. A few weeks after the close of the The War with France 1793 TO 1815 May 21, 1798 SPINNING — REELING WITH THE CLOCK-REEL — BOILING YARN. rebellion nine hundred Erench soldiers under General Humbert landed in Mayo, broke a force of thrice their number in a battle at Castlebar, and only surrendered when the Lord-Lieutenant, Lord Cornwallis, faced them with thirty thousand men. Pitt's disgust at "the bigoted fury of Iri.sh Protestants" backed Lord Cornwallis in checking the reprisals of his troops and of the Orangemen ; Init the hideous cruelty which he was forced to witness brought about a firm resolve to put an end to the farce of " Independence." which left Ireland helpless in such hands. The political necessity for a union of the twfj islands hatl been brouL^ht lioiiic to cxcr)- 1786 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. The Wak with France 1793 TO I815 English statesman by the course of the Irish Parliament during the disputes over the Regency ; for while England repelled the claims of the Prince of Wales to the Regency as of right, the legislature of Ireland admitted them. As the only union left between the two peoples was their obedience to a common ruler, such an act might conceivably have ended in their entire severance ; and the sense of this danger secured a welcome in England for Pitt's proposal to unite the two Parliaments. The WINDING — WARPING— WEAVING. 1799 opposition of the Irish boroughmongers was naturall}- stubborn and determined. But with them it was a sheer question of gold ; and their assent was bought with a million in mone\', and with a liberal distribution of pensions and peerages. Base and shameless as were such means, Pitt may fairly plead that they were the only means by which the bill for the Union could have been passed. As the matter was finally arranged in June 1800, one hundred Irish members became part of the House of Commons at Westminster, and twenty-eight temporal with four spiritual peers, chosen for life by their fellows, took their .seats in the House MODERN ENGLAND 1787 of Lords. Commerce between the two countries was freed from Sec^iv all restrictions, and every trading privilege of the one thrown open to the other ; while taxation was proportionately distributed between the two peoples. The lavish creation of peers which formed a part of the price paid for the Union of Ireland brought about a practical change in our constitution. Few bodies have varied more in the number of ^^^^ their members than the House of Lords. At the close of the Wars The Wak with Fkance 1793 TO I815 Pitt and the WASH MILL — RUBBING BOAUUS — BEETLING ENGI.NE (EOK CLAZING)— BtJU-l-NG-HuDSE. of the Roses the hi)- lords who remained numbered fiftN'-two ; in Elizabeth's reign they numbered onK- sixt)' ; the prodigal creations of the Stuarts raised them to one hundred and seventy- si. v. At this point, however, they practically remained stationary during the reigns of the first two Georges ; and, as we have .seen, only the dogged opposition of W'alpole pre\-cntcd Lord .Stanliopc from limiting the peerage to the number it had at that time reached. Mischievous as such a measure would have been, it would at an\' rate have prevented the la\ish creation of peerages on which George the Third relied in tlie earl)- da\-s of his reign as oiu- of his 1788 HISTORY Ol" THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV THt War with FKANCt 1793 TO I815 Increase of tin- Peers incan.s of breaking up the party government which restrained him. l^ut what was with the King a mere means of corruption became witli IMtt a settled pur})ose of bringing the peerage into closer relations with the landowning and opulent classes, and rendering the Crown independent of factious combinations among the existing peers. While himself disdainful of hereditary honours, he lavished them as no Minister had lavished them before. In his first five \-ears of rule he created fort}--cight new peers. In two later \-cars alone, 1796-7, he created thirty-five. Bj- 1801 the WET AND DRV BLEACHING — BLEACH-MII.l.. peerages whicii were the price of the Union with Ireland had helped to raise his creations to upwards of one hundred and forty. So busil}- was his example followed b)- his successors that at the end of George the Third's reign the number of hereditary peers had become double what it was at his accession. The whole character of the House of Lords was changed. Up to this time it had been a small assembly of great nobles, bound together by family or party ties into a distinct power in the State. From this time it became the stronghold of propert}-, the representative of the ijreat estates and great fortunes which the vast increase of MODERN ENGLAND 1789 English wealth was building up. For the first time, too, in our history it became the distinctly conservative element in our constitution. The full import of Pitt's changes has still to be revealed, but in some ways their results have been clearly marked. The larger number of the peerage, though due to the will of the Crown, has practically freed the House from any influence which the Crown can exert b>- the distribution of honours. This change, since the power of the Crown has been practically wielded by the Sec. IV The War with Fkance 1793 TO I815 l.AFPING-ROOM— MEASURING — CRISl'ING — FOI.DINC; House of Commons, has rendered it far harder to reconcile the free action of the Lords with the regular working of constitutional government. On the other hand, the increased number of its members has rendered the IIou.se more responsi\c to jiublic opinion, when public opinion is strongly pronounced ; and the- political tact which is inherent in great aristocratic assemblies has hitherto prevented an)' collision with the T.owcm- House from being pushed to an irreconcilable quarrel. ]^ut the legislative union of the two countries was oiil)- part of Catholic the ];lan which I'ill had conceived for the concihat ion of hcland. cipation 179° HISTORY OF THE ExNGLlSH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV The War with l-KANCE '793 1 815 With the conclusion of the Union his projects of free trade between the countries, which had been defeated a few years back, came into play ; and in spite of insufficient capital and social disturbance the growth of the trade, shipping, and manufactures of Ireland has- gone steadily on from that time to this. The change which brought Ireland directly under the common Parliament was followed too by a gradual revision of its oppressive laws, and an amendment in their administration ; taxation was lightened, and a faint beginning made of public instruction. But in Pitt's mind BROWN LINEN MARKKT, BANBRIUGE. Pitt's policy the great means of conciliation was the concession of religious equality. In proposing to the Plnglish Parliament the union of the two countries he pointed out that when thus joined to a Protestant country like England all danger of a Catholic supremacy in Ireland, should Catholic disabilities be removed, would be practically at an end ; and had suggested that in such a case " an effectual and adequate provision for the Catholic clergy " would be a security for their loyalty. His words gave strength to the hopes of " Catholic Emancipation," or the removal of what remained of the civil disabilities of Catholics, which were held out by the MODERN ENGLAND 1791 viceroy, Lord Castlereagh, in Ireland itself, as a means of hindering sec. iv any opposition to the project of Union on the part of the Catholics. The \\ AR WITH It was agreed on all sides that their opposition would have secured Frakck its defeat ; but no Catholic opposition showed itself After the n'' passing of the bill, Pitt prepared to lay before the Cabinet a — measure which would have raised the Irish Catholic to perfect equality of ci\-il rights. He proposed to remove all religious tests which limited the exercise of the franchise, or were required for admission to Parliament, the magistracy, the bar, municipal offices, or posts m the army, or the service of the State. An oath of allegiance and of fidelity to the Constitution was substituted for the Sacramental test ; while the loyalty of the Catholic and Dissenting clergy was secured by a grant of some provision to both by the State. To win over the Episcopal Church, measures were added for strengthening its means of discipline, and for increasing the stipends of its poorer ministers. A commutation of tithes was to remove a constant source of quarrel in Ireland between the Protestant clergy and the Irish people. The scheme was too large Its defeat and statesmanlike to secure the immediate assent of the Cabinet ; and before that assent could be won the plan was communicated through the treachery of the Chancellor, Lord Loughborough, to George the Third. " I count any man m)- personal enem}'," the King broke out angrily to Dundas, " who proposes an}- such measure." Pitt answered this outburst by submitting his whole plan to the King. " The political circumstances under which the exclusive laws originated," he wrote, "arising cither from the con- flicting powers of hostile and near)}' balanced sects, from the apprehension of a Popish Queen as successor, a disputed succession and a foreign pretender, a division in Europe between Catholic and Protestant Powers, arc no longer applicable to the present state of things." But argument was wasted upon George the Third. In spite of the decision of the lawyers whom he consulted, the King held himself bound by his Coronation Oath to maintain the tests. On this point his bigotry was at one wilii tlic bigotr\- of the bulk of his subjects, as well as with their political distrust of Catholics and Iri.shmen; and his ob.stinacy was strengthened by a knowledge that his refusal must drive Pitt from office. In l*'cbruary i.Soi, the /v// month of the Peace (jf Luncvillc, Pitt resigned, ant! was succeeded '"'■■^'.V'-^ 1792 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. The War with Franck 1793 TO 1815 The Adding- ton Ministry Sec. IV by the S})cakcr of the House of Commons, Mr. Addington, a weak and narrow-minded man, and as bigoted as the King himself. Of Lord Hawkesbur}-, who succeeded Lord Grenville in the conduct of foreign affairs, nothing was known outside the House of Commons. It was with anxiety that England found itself guided by men like these at a time when every hour brought darker news. The scarcity of bread was mounting to a famine. Taxes were raised anew, and }-et the loan for the year amounted to five and twenty millions. The country stood utterly alone ; while the peace of Luneville secured France from all hostility on the Continent. And it was soon plain that this peace was onh- the first step in a new policy on the part of the First Consul. What he had done w^as to free his hands for a decisive conflict with Britain itself, both as a world-power and as a centre of wealth. England was at once the carrier of European commerce, and the workshop of European manufactures. While her mines, her looms, her steam-engines, were giving her almost a monopoly of industrial production, the carrying trade of France and Holland alike had been transferred to the British flag, and the conquest during the war of their richer settlements had thrown into British hands the whole colonial trade of the world. In his gigantic project of a " Continental System " the aim of Buonaparte was to strike at the trade of England by closing the ports of Europe against her ships. By a league of the Northern powers he sought to wrest from her the command of the seas. Denmark and Sweden, who resented the severity with which Britain enforced that right of search which had brought about their armed neutrality at the close of the American war, were enlisted in a league of neutrals which was in effect a declaration of war against England, and which Prussia was prepared to join. The Czar Paul of Russia on his side saw in the power of Britain the chief obstacle to his designs upon Turkey. A squabble over Malta, which had been taken from the Knights of St. John by Buonaparte on his way to Egypt, and had ever since been blockaded by English ships, but whose possession the Czar claimed as his own on the ground of an alleged election as Grand Master of the Order, served him as a pretext for a quarrel with England, and Paul openly prepared for hostilities. It was plain that as soon The Con- tinental System MODERN ENGLAND 1793 Sec. IV The War with France 1793 TO I8IS The as spring opened the Baltic, the fleets of Russia, Sweden, and Denmark would act in practical union with those of France and Spain. But dexterous as the combination was it was shattered at a blow. In April a British fleet appeared before Copenhagen, and after a desperate struggle silenced the Danish batteries, captured six Danish .ships, and forced Denmark to conclude an armistice Coalition which enabled English ships to enter the Baltic. The Northern ^"''"^''" "^ ^ ^ ^ 1801 Coalition too was broken up by the death of the Czar. In June a Convention between England and Russia settled the ve.Kcd ques- tions of the right of search and contraband of war, and this Con- vention was accepted by Sweden and Denmark. Meanwhile, at the very moment of the attack on Copenhagen, a stroke as cffcctiv^e MEDAL GIVEN TO INDIAN TROOPS FOR VICTORIES IN EGVI'T, iSoi. Tancred, " Historical Record of Medals." had wrecked the projects of Buonaparte in the East. The surrender of Malta to the English fleet left England the mistress of the Mediterranean ; and from Malta she now turned to Egypt itself A force of 15,000 men under General Abcrcromby anchored in Aboukir Ba)'. The French troops that Buonaparte had left in Egypt rapidly concentrated, and on the 21st of March their general attacked the English army. After a stubborn battle, in which Abercromby fell mortally wounded, the I-'rench drew off with heavy loss ; and at the close of June the capitulation of the 13,000 soldiers who remained closed the French rule over ICgyj)!. Both parties in this gigantic struggle however were at last anxious to suspend the war. It was to give time for such an orcranization (jf I'rancc and its resources as niiLrht enable him to The Peace of Amiens CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1795 reopen the struggle with other chances of success that Buonaparte opened negotiations for peace at the close of 1801. His offers were at once met b)- the English Government. The terms of the Peace of Amiens, which was concluded in March 1802, were necessarily simple, for England had no claim to interfere with the settlement of the Continent. France promised to retire from Southern Italy, and to leave to themselves the republics it had set up along its border in Holland, Switzerland, and Piedmont. England recognized the French Government, gave up her newly conquered colonies save Ceylon and Trinidad, acknowledged the Sec. IV 'rHE Wak with Fk.vnce 1793 TO I815 MALTA. After /. M. IV. Turner. Ionian Islands as a free Republic, and engaged to replace the Knights of St. John in the isle of Malta. There was a general sense of relief at the close of the long struggle ; and the new French ambassador was drawn in triumi^h on his arrival through the streets of London. But shrewd observers saw the dangers that lay in the temper of the P'irst Consul. Whatever had been the errors of the PVench revolutionists, even their worst attacks on the independence of the nations around them had been veiled h)- a vague notion of freeing the peoples whom the}- in\-adcd from the yoke of their rulers. IjuI the aim of Ikionaparte was simp!)' that Vol. IV— Part 39 5 / Di-xlirns of Xtipolvun 3 ^ ^^^^^li^^^^d^i^^ CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1797 Sec. IV The War with Fran'ce 1793 TO I815 of a vulgar conqueror. He was resolute to be master of the \\ estern world, and no notions of popular freedom or sense of national right interfered with his resolve. The means at his command were immense. The political life of the Revolution had been cut short by his military despotism, but the new social vigour which it had given to France through the abolition of privileges and the creation of a new middle class on the ruins of the clergy and the nobles still lived on. While the dissensions which tore France asunder were hushed by the policy of the First Consul, by his restoration of the Church as a religious power, his recall of the exiles, and the economj^ and wise administration which distinguished his rule, the centralized system of government be- queathed by the Monarchy to the Revolution, and by the Revolu- tion to Buonaparte, enabled him easily to seize this national vigour for the profit of his own despotism. The exhaustion of the brilliant hopes raised by the Revolution, the craving for public order, the military enthusiasm and the impulse of a new glory given by the wonderful victories France had won, made a Tyranny possible ; and in the hands of Buonaparte this t}'rann\' was supported by a secret police, by the suppression of the press and of all freedom of opinion, and above all by the iron will and immense ability of the First Consul himself Once chosen Consul for life, h^ felt himself secure at home, and turned restlessly to the work of outer aggression. The pledges given at Amiens were set aside. The republics established on the borders of France were brought into mere dependence on his will. Piedmont and Parma were annexed to France ; and a P^rench army occupied Switzerland. The temperate protests of the English Government were answered Declara- by demands for the expulsion of the French exiles who had been ,j,„/ li\ing in England ever since the Revolution, and for its surrender of Malta, which was retained till some security could be devised against a^ fresh seizure of the island by the French fleet. It was plain that a struggle was inevitable ; huge armaments were pre- paring in the French ports, and a new activity was .seen in those of Spain. In May 1803 the British Government anticipated Buona- parte's attack by a declaration of war. The breach only quickened Buonaparte's resolve to attack the Trafalgar enemy at home. The difficulties in his way he set contcmpUiousI\- 5 ^^ ^ CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1799 Sec. IV The War with France 1793 TO 1815 The Camp at MEDAL COMMKMoRATIXG THE OATH AT BOULOGNE. aside. " Fifteen millions of people," he said, in allusion to the dis- proportion between the population of England and France, " must give \va}' to fort\' millions ; " and an in- vasion of England itself was planned on a gigantic scale. A camp of one hun- dred thousand men was formed at Bou- logne, and a host of flat-bottomed boats ^'"'^°S'''^ gathered for their conveyance across the Channel. The peril of the nation forced Addington from office and recalled Pitt to power. His health was broken, and as the da\'s went by his appearance be- came so haggard and depressed that it was plain death was drawing near. But d\'ing as he really was, the nation clung to him with all its old faith. He was still the representative of_ national union ; and he proposed to include Fox and the leading Whigs in his new ministry, but he was foiled by the bigotry of the King ; and the refusal of Lord Grenville and of Windham to take office without Fox, as. well as the loss of his post at a later time by his ablest supporter, Dundas, left him almost alone. But lonely as he was, he faced difficulty and danger with the same courage as of old. The invasion seemed imminent when Buonaparte, who now assumed the title of the Emperor Napoleon, appeared in the camp at Boulogne. " Let us be masters of the Channel for six hours," he is reported to havesaid,"and we arc masters I if the world." A skilfully combined plan by which the B r i t i s h fleet w o u 1 d have been divided, while the whole l''rcnch navy was concentrated in the Channel, was delayed by the death of the admiral destined to execute it. l^ut the alliance with .Spain placed the .Spanish fleet at -MKD.AL MkLCK ii V .NAPOLEON IN ANTICU'A IIO.N OK INVASION OK E.NGLAND. PART OF LETTER WRITTEN BY NELSON JUST HEFORE THE BATTLE OF TRAFALGAR. Royal Naval College, Greorjuich. CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND iSoi OI.r> BRISTOI, VOLUNTKEU. Xicholls and Taylor, "Bristol Past anil Present." The War with Kranck 1793 TO I815 League ngaiitsf France Napoleon's disposal, and in 1805 he planned its union with that of Sec. iv France, the crushing of the squadron which blocked the ports of the Channel before the English ships which were watching the Spanish armament could come to its support, and a crossing of the vast arma- ment thus protected to the English shore. The three hundred thou- sand volunteers mustered in England to meet the coming attack- would have offered small hindrance to the veterans of the Grand Army,had they once crossed the Channel. But Pitt had already found work for France elsewhere. The alarm of the Continental Powers had been brought to a head by Napoleon's annexation of Genoa ; Pitt's subsidies had removed the last obstacle in the way of a league ; and Russia, Austria, and Sweden joined in an alliance to wrest Italy and the Low Countries from the grasp of the French Emperor. Napoleon meanwhile swept the sea in vain for a glimpse oj" the great armament whose assembly in the Channel he had so skilfully planned. Admiral X'illcneuvc, uniting the Spanish ships with his own squadron from Toulon, drew Nelson in pursuit to the West Indies, and then, suddenly returning to Cadiz, hastened to form a junction with the P^rench squadron at Brest and crush the English fleet in the Channel. But a headlong pursuit brought Nelson up with him ere the manoeuvre was complete, and the two fleets met on the 2 1st of October, 1805, off Cape Trafalgar. " England." ran Nelson's famous signal, " expects every man to do his duty ; " and though he fell himself in the hour of victor}-, twenty P^-ench sail had struck their flag ere the day was done. '* England has saved herself by her courage," Pitt said in what were destined to be his last public words : " she will save Europe by her example I " But even before the victory of Trafalgar Napoleon had al)andoncd the dream of in- vading England to meet the coalition in his rear ; and swinging round his forces on the Danube he forced an Austrian army to capitulation in Ulm three days before his naval defeat, l-'rom Ulm \ov. iSo he marched on Vienna, and crushed the conibini'd armii-s of Austria and Russia in the battle of Austerlitz. " Auslcrlil/.," W'ilbirforcc l802 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV The War with France 1793 TO 1815 wrote in his diary, " killed Pitt." Though he was still but forty- seven, the hollow voice and wasted frame of the great Minister had long tokl that tlcath was near ; and the blow to his hopes proved fatal. " Roll up that map," he said, pointing to a map of Europe which hung upon the wall : " it will not be wanted these ten AKTIuR, l^oo.RT^o nelson's monument, in crypt of s. Paul's cathedral. Death of years ! " Once only he rallied from stupor ; and those who bent over him caught a faint murmur of " My country ! How I leave my country!" On the 23rd of January, 1806, he breathed his last ; and was laid in Westminster Abbey in the grave of Chatham. " What grave," exclaimed Lord Wellesley, " contains such a father MODERN ENGLAND 1803 and such a son ! What sepulchre embosoms the remains of so Sec. iv much human excellence and elorv ! " '^he ^ ^ War with So great was felt to be the loss that nothing but the union of France - 1793 parties, which Pitt had in vain desired durins: his lifetime, could to fill up the gap left by his death. In the new Ministry Fox, with — the small body of popular Whigs who were bent on peace and Grenville internal reform, united with the aristocratic Whigs under Lord ^'"^^^""y Grenville and with the Tories under Lord Sidmouth. All home questions in fact were subordinated to the need of saving Europe from the ambition of France, and in the resolve to save Europe Fox was as resolute as Pitt himself. His hopes of peace, indeed, were stronger ; but they were foiled by the evasive answer which Napoleon gave to his overtures, and by a new war which he under- took against Prussia, the one power which seemed able to resist his arms. On the 14th of October, 1806, a decisiv^e victory at jena jena laid North Germany at Napoleon's feet. Death only a month before saved Fox from witnessing the overthrow of his hopes ; and his loss weakened the Grenville Cabinet at the opening of a new and more desperate struggle with France. Napoleon's earlier attempt at the enforcement of a Continental System had broken down with the failure of the Northern League ; but in his mastery of Europe he now saw a more effectiv^e means of realizing his dream ; and he was able to find a pretext for his new attack in England's own action. By a violent stretch of her rights as a com- batant she had declared the whole coast occupied b)' France and its allies, from Dantzig to Trieste, to be in a state of blockade. It was impossible to enforce such a " paper blockade," even with the immense force at her disposal ; and Napoleon seized on the opportunity to retaliate by the entire exclusion of Pritish commerce from the Continent, an exclusion which he trusted would end the war by the ruin it would bring on the English manu- facturers. A decree was issued from Hcrlin which — without a The single ship to carry it out- — placed the British Islands in a state nccrve of blockade. All commerce or communication with ihcm was ^'ov. 1S06 prohibited ; all English goods or manufactures found in the territory of F"rancc or its allies were declared liable to confiscation ; and their harbours were closed, not only against vessels coming from Britain but against all wIkj had touched at her ports. The AKBER, KING OF DELHI, AND SIR THOMAS METCALFE. Illumination, c. 1830, in India Museion. CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1805 attempt to enforce such a system was foiled indeed by the rise of a widespread contraband trade, by the reluctance of Holland to aid in its own ruin, by the connivance of officials along the Prussian and Russian shores, and by the pressure of facts. It was impossible even for Napoleon himself to do without the goods he pretended to exclude ; an immense system of licences soon neutralized his decree ; and the French army which marched to Eylau was clad in great-coats made at Leeds, and shod with shoes made at Northampton. But if it failed to destroy British industry, it told The War with France 1793 TO 18IS rAi.i:rriA .Mill 11. \, 1S02. Gcntlcmati s Mitgaziuc. far more fatally on British commerce. Trade began to move from English vessels, which were subject to instant confiscation, and to pass into the hands of neutrals, and especially of the Americans. The merchant class called on the Government to pro- tect it, and it was to this appeal that the Grcnxillc Ministry replied in January, 1807, by an Order in Council which declared Orders in all the ports of the coast of France and her allies under blockade, and any neutral vessels trading between them to be good prize. Such a step was far from .satisfying the liritish merchants. Hut their ap[jcal was no longer to Lord Grenvillc. The forces of iSo6 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. IV ignorance and bigotn- which had been too strong for Pitt were too The strong for the Grenvillc Ministry. Its greatest work, the abolition War with ^ , o > Fkance Qf {-j^g slave trade, in February, was done in the teeth of a vic:orous 1793 TO opposition from the Tories and the merchants of Liverpool ; and — in March the first indication of its desire to open the question of religious equality by allowing Catholic officers to serve in the army was met on the part of the King b}' the demand of a pledge not to meddle with the question. On the refusal of this pledge the Ministry was dismissed. Canning Its fall was the final close of the union of parties brought about by the peril of P^rench invasion ; and from this time to the end of the war England was wholly governed by the Tories. The nominal head of the Ministry which succeeded that of Lord Grenville was the Duke of Portland ; its guiding spirit was the Foreign Secretary, George Canning, a young and devoted adherent of Pitt, whose brilliant rhetoric gave him power over the House of Commons, while the vigour and breadth of his mind gav^e a new energy and colour to the war. At no time had opposition to Napoleon seemed so hopeless. From Berlin the P^mperor marched into the heart of Poland, and though checked in the winter by the Russian forces in the hard-fought battle of Eylau, his victory of Friedland brought the Czar Alexander in the summer of 1807 to Peace 0/ cousent to the Peace of Tilsit. From foes the two Emperors of Western and Eastern Europe became friends, and the hope of French aid in the conquest of Turkey drew Alexander to a close alliance with Napoleon. Russia not only enforced the Berlin decrees against British commerce, but forced Sweden, the one ally that England still retained on the Continent, to renounce her alliance. The Russian and Swedish fleets were thus placed at the service of France ; and the two Emperors counted on securing the fleet of Den- mark, and again threatening by this union the maritime supremacy which formed P^ngland's real defence. The hope was foiled by the appearance off Elsinore in July 1807 of an expedition, promptly and secretly equipped by Canning, with a demand for the sur- render of the Danish fleet into the hands of England, on pledge of its return at the close of the war. On the refusal of the Danes the demand was enforced by a bombardment of Copenhagen ; and the whole Danish fleet, with a vast mass of naval stores, was Ti/sit MODERN ENGLAND 1807 carried into British ports. It was in the same spirit of almost Sec. iv reckless decision that Canning^ turned to meet Napoleon's '^'"^ ^ '^ Vt AR WITH Continental System. In November he issued fresh Orders in Council. By these France, and every Continental state from Fka.ncf. 1793 I8I5 GKOUGIi CANNING. /;i(si in h'ationnl Portrait Gallery. which the British flag was excluded, was put in a state of blockade, and all vessels bound for their harbours were hckl subject to seizure unless they had touched at a British port. The orders were at once met by another decree of Na[)ole()ii issued at Drcnu The Milan i8o8 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV Milan in December, which declared every nation, comint^ from or )r ail)' l^ritisli colony, to The vessel, of whatcvcr nation, comintj from or \\ AK WITH '^ KRANcii bound to l^rilain 1793 TO have forfeited its character as a neutral, and 1815 - — to be Hable to seizure. The Pen- insular War OFFICER, 1792, The Fortieth Regiment.' Meanwhile the effect of the Continental System upon Napoleon was to drive him to aggression after aggression in order to main- tain the material union of Europe against Britain. He was absolutely master of Western Europe, and its whole face changed as at an enchanter's touch. Prussia was occupied by French troops. Holland was changed into a monarchy by a simple decree of the French Emperor, and its crown bestowed on his brother Louis. Another brother, Jerome, be- came King of Westphalia, a new realm built up out of the Electorates of Hesse Cassel and Hanover. A third brQther, Joseph, was made King of Naples : while the rest of Italy, and even Rome itself, was annexed to the French Empire. It was the hope of effectually crushing the world-power of Britain which drove him to his worst aggression, the aggres- sion upon Spain. He acted with his usual subtlety. In October 1807 France and Spain agreed to divide Portugal between them ; and on the advance of their forces the reigning house of Braganza fled helplessly from Lisbon to a refuge in Brazil. But the seizure of Portugal was only a prelude to the seizure of Spain. Charles the Fourth, whom a riot in his capital drove at this moment to abdica- tion, and his son, Ferdinand the Seventh, were drawn to Bayonne in May 1808, and forced to resign their claims to the Spanish crown ; while a French army entered Madrid and proclaimed Joseph Buonaparte But this hirint in British Museum. circumstances of the time. The war enriched the landowner, the farmer, the merchant, the manufacturer ; but it impoverished the poor. It is indeed from, these fatal years which lie between the Peace of Luncville and Waterloo that we must date that war of classes, that social severance between employers and employed, which still forms the main difficulty of English politics. But it is from these years too that we must date the renewal of that progressive movement in politics which had been suspended since the opening of the war. The publication of the EdinbiirgJi Rcvieio in 1802 by a knot of young lawyers at Edinburgh marked a revival of the policy of constitutional and administrative progress which liad been reluctantly abandoned by William Pitt. Jeremy xMODERN ENGLAND 1817 Bentham gave a new vigour to political speculation by his Sec. iv advocacy of the doctrine of Utility, and his definition of " the . 'i'"E ^ \V AR WITH greatest happiness of the greatest number " as the aim of political ^"kanck I 70** action. In 1809 Sir Francis Burdctt revived the question of to 181 ? Parliamentary Reform. Only fifteen members supported his — : motion ; and a reference to the House of Commons, in a pamphlet which he subsequently published, as " a part of our fellow-subjects collected together by means which it is not necessary to describe " was met by his committal to the Tower, where he remained till the prorogation of the Parliament. A far greater effect was produced by the perseverance with which Canning pressed year by year the question of Catholic Emancipation. So long as Perceval lived both efforts at Reform were equally vain ; but on the accession of Lord Liverpool to power the advancing strength of a more liberal sentiment in the nation was felt by the policy of "moderate concession " which was adopted by the new ministry. Catholic Emancipation became an open question in the Cabinet itself, and was adopted in 18 12 by a triumphant majority in the Llouse of Commons, though still rejected b}- the Lords. With social and political troubles thus awaking about them, War with rr Ml- r 1 -11 America even iory statesmen were not willmg to lace the terrible consequences of a ruin of English industry, such as might follow from the junction of America with Napoleon. They were, in fact, preparing to withdraw the Orders in Council, when their plans were arrested by the dissolution of the Perceval Ministr)-. Its position had from the first been a weak one. A return of the King's madness had made it necessary in the beginning of iSii to confer the Regency by Act of Parliament on the Prince of Wales ; and the Whig sj'mpathics of the Prince threatened the Perceval Cabinet with dismissal. The insccurit\- of their position told on the conduct of the war; for the aj^parcnl inaclivit\' of Wellington during 181 1 was really due to the hesitation and timidity of the ministers at home. In May 1812 the assa.ssination of Perceval by a maniac named l^cllingliam brought about the fall of his ministry ; and fresh efforts were made by the Regent to install the Whigs in office. Mutual distruht, however, foiled his attempts ; and the old ministry was restored under the headship '/'/ir of Lfjrd Liverpool, a man of no great abilities, but teinpi-ratc, j//;;/J/^ well inffjrmed, and endowed with a remarkable skill in holding i8i8 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE 1793 TO 1815 Sec. IV discordant colleagues together. The most important of these The colleagues was Lord Castlereagh, who became Secretary for War with ° France Foreign Affairs. His first work was to meet the danger in which Canning had involved the country by his Orders in Council. At the opening of 18 12 America, in despair of redress, had resolved on war ; Congress voted an increase of both army and navy, and laid an embargo on all ves.sels in American harbours. Actual hostilities might still have been averted by the repeal of the Orders, on which the English Cabinet was resolved, but in the confusion which followed the murder of Perceval the opportunity was lost. On the 23rd of June, onl}' twelve days after the ministr}- had been formed, the Orders were repealed ; but when the news of the repeal reached America, it came six weeks too late. On the 18th of June an Act of Congress had declared America at war with Great Britain. Sala- The moment when America entered into the great struggle and ''"^'as a critical moment in the history of mankind. Six days after Moscow President Madison issued his declaration of war. Napoleon crossed the Niemcn on his march to Moscow. Successful as his policy had been in stirring up w^ar between England and America, it had been no less successful in breaking the alliance which he had made with the Emperor Alexander at Tilsit and in forcing on a contest with Russia. On the one hand, Napoleon was irritated by the refusal of Russia to enforce strictly the suspension of all trade with England, though such a suspension would have ruined the Russian landowners. On the other, the Czar saw with growing anxiety the advance of the French Empire which sprang from Napoleon's resolve to enforce his system by a seizure of the northern coasts. In 181 1 Holland, the Hanseatic towns, part of Westphalia, and the Duchy of Oldenburg were successively annexed, and the Duchy of Mecklenburg threatened with seizure. A peremptory demand on the part of France for the entire cessa- tion of intercourse with England brought the quarrel to a head ; and preparations were made on both sides for a gigantic struggle. The best of the French soldiers were drawn from Spain to the frontier Welling- of Poland ; and Wellington, whose army had been raised to a force 'cA "' of fort\- thousand P2nglishmen and twenty thousand Portuguese, profited b}- the withdrawal to throw off his system of defence and to assume an attitude of attack. Ciudad Rodrigo and Badajoz MODERN ENGLAND 1819 were taken b}' storm during the spring of 1812 ; and three days Sec. iv tefore Napoleon crossed the Niemen in his march on Moscow „, '1""^ '^ War with Wellington crossed the Agueda in a march on Salamanca. After France 1793 a series of masterly movements on both sides, Marmont with the to French army of the north attacked the English on the hills in the — neighbourhood of that town. While he was marching round the July zz right of the English position, his left wing remained isolated ; and with a sudden exclamation of " Marmont is lost ! " Wellington flung on it the bulk of his force, crushed it, and drov^e the whole army from the field. The loss on either side was nearly equal, but failure had demoralized the French arm\' ; and its retreat forced Joseph to leave Madrid, and Soult to evacuate Andalusia and to concentrate the southern arm\' on the eastern coast. While .MED.\L CO.M.ME.MORATING WELLINGTON'S E.\ I RV l.NTu .M.VlJRID. Napoleon was still pushing slowly over the vast plains of Poland, Wellington made his entr\- into Madrid in August, and began the siege of Burgos. The town however held out gallantly for a month, till the advance of the two French armies, now concen- trated in the north and south of Spain, forced Wellington in October to a hast}' retreat on the Portuguese frontier. If he had shaken the rule of the French in Spain in this campaign, his ulti- mate failure showed how firm a militar)' hold they still possessed there, liut the disappointment was forgotten in the news which followed it. At the moment when the English troops fell back Tin- from liurgos began the retreat of the Grand Army from Moscow. ^]rom Victorious in a battle at Rorodino, Napoleon had entered the older •'^"*'"''''' •capital of Russia in triuini)h, and waiteti impatienli)- to receive i82o HISTORY OF THE 1-:NGLISH PEOPLE chap. 1793 TO 181:; Sec. IV proposals of peace from the Czar, when a fire kindled by its own I'Hii inhabitants reduced the citv to ashes. The French armv was forced War with ■' ' Kkanck |-q f^]i \)-^xzV aniitlst the horrors of a Russian winter. Of the four huntlred thousand combatants who formed the Grand Army at its first outset, only a {<^\\ thousand recrossed the Niemen in December. Fall of In spite of the gigantic efforts which Napoleon made to repair the loss of the Grand Army, the spell which he had cast over Europe was broken by the retreat from Moscow. Prussia rose against him as the Russians crossed the Niemen in the spring of 181 3 ; and the forces which held it were at once thrown back on the Elbe. In this emergency the military genius of the French Emperor rose to its height. With a fresh army of two hundred thousand men whom he had gathered up at Mainz he marched on the allied armies of Russia and Prussia in May, cleared Saxony by a victory over them at Lutzen, and threw them back on the Oder by a fresh victory at Bautzen. Disheartened by defeat, and by the neutral attitude which Austria still preserved, the "iwo powers con- sented in June to an armistice, and negotiated for peace. But Austria, though unwilling to utterly ruin France to the profit of her great rival in the East, was as resolute as either of the allies to wa'cst from Napoleon his supremacy over Europe ; and at the moment when it became clear that Napoleon was only bent on playing with her proposals, she was stirred to action by news that his army was at last driven from Spain. Wellington had left Portugal in May with an army which had now risen to ninety June 2\, thousand men ; and, overtaking the French forces in retreat at ^ Vitoria, he inflicted on them a defeat which drove them in utter rout across the Pyrenees. Madrid was at once evacuated ; and Clauzel fell back from Zaragoza into P^rance. The victory not only freed Spain from its invaders ; it restored the spirit of the Allies. The close of the armistice was followed by a union of Austria with the forces of Prussia and the Czar ; and in October a final overthrow of Napoleon at Leipzig forced the French army to fall back in rout across the Rhine. The war now hurried to its close. Though held at bay for a while by the sieges of San Sebastian and Pampeluna, as well as by an obstinate defence of the Pyrenees, Wellington succeeded in the very month of the triumph at Leipzig in winning a victory on the Bidassoa, which enabled him to enter MODERN ENGLAND 182 1 1793 ru France. He was soon followed by the Allies. On the last day of Sec. iv 1813 their forces crossed the Rhine : and a third of France passed, Ihe War with without opposition, into their hands. For two months more fkance Napoleon maintained a wonderful struggle with' a handful of raw conscripts against their overwhelming numbers ; while in the south, Soult, forced from his entrenched camp near Bayonne and defeated at Orthes, fell back before Wellington on Toulouse. Here their two armies met in April in a stubborn and indecisive engagement. But though neither leader knew it, the war was even then at an end. The struggle of Napoleon himself had ended at the close of ]\Iarch with the surrender of Paris ; and the submission of the capital was at once followed by the abdication of the Emperor and the return of the Bourbons. England's triumph over its enemy was dashed b\- the more The doubtful fortunes of the struggle across the Atlantic. The dcclara- '^'^^r^" tion of vrar by Am^erica seemed an act of sheer madness ; for its navy consisted of a few frigates and sloops ; its army was a mass of half-drilled and half-armed recruits ; while the States themselves were divided on the question of the war, and Connecticut with Massachusetts refused to send either money or men. Three attempts to penetrate into Canada during the summer and autumn were repulsed with heavy loss. But these failures were more than redeemed by unexpected successes at sea. In two successive en- gagements between English and American frigates, the former were forced to strike their flag. The effect of these victories was out of all proportion to their real importance ; for they were the first heavy blows which had been dealt at England's supremacy over the seas. In 181 3 America followed up its naval triumphs by more vigorous efforts on land. Its forces cleared Lake Ontario, captured Toronto, destroyed the British flotilla on Lake lu-ic, and made themselves masters of Upper Canada. An attack on Lower Canada, however, was successfully beaten back ; and a fresh advance of the British and Canadian forces in the heart of the winter again recovered the Upper Province. The reverse gave fresh strength to the party in the United States which had throughout been opposed to the war, and whose opposition to it had been embittered by the terrible di.strcss brought about l)\- the blockade and the ruin of American ccjunnerce- Cries of secession l822 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Sec. IV The War with Franck 1793 1815 began to be heard, and Massachusetts took the bold step of appointing delegates to confer with delegates from the other New England States " on the subject of their grievances and common conccrn:>." In 1S14, however, the war was renewed with more vigour than e\cr ; and Upper Canada was again invaded. But the American arm}-, after inflicting a severe defeat on the British forces in the battle of Chippewa in July, was itself defeated a few weeks after in an equally stubborn engagement, and thrown back on its own frontier ; while the fall of Napoleon enabled the English Government to de- vote its whole strength to the struggle with an enemy which it had ceased to de- spise. General Ross, with a force of four thousand men, appeared in the Potomac, captured Washington, and before evacuating the city burnt its public buildings to the ground. Few more shameful acts arc recorded in our history ; and it was the more shameful in that it was done under strict orders from the Govern- ment at home. The raid upon Washington, however, was intended simply to strike terror into the American people ; and the real stress of the war was thrown on two expeditions whose business was to penetrate into the States from the north and from the south. Both proved utter failures. A force of nine thousand Peninsular veterans which marched in September to the attack of Plattsburg on Lake Champlain was forced to fall back by the defeat of the English flotilla which accom- panied it. A second force under General Packcnham appeared in December at the mouth of the Mississippi and attacked New Orleans, but was repulsed by General Jackson with the loss of half its numbers. Peace, however, had already been concluded. MEDAL GIVEN BY ENGLAND TO INDIAN CHIEFS IN THE AMERICAN WAR. Tancred, ^^ Record of Medals" MODERN ENGLAND i8: 1793 TO IS15 The close of the French war, if it left untouched the grounds of the Sec. iv struggle, made the United States sensible of the danger of pushino; the ^ ^ ^ War with it further ; Britain herself was anxious for peace ; and the warring France claims, both of England and America, were set aside in silence in the treaty of 1814. The close of the war with America freed England's hands at a Return moment when the reappearance of Napoleon at Paris called her to Napoleon a new and final struggle with France. By treaty with the Allied Powers Napoleon had been suffered to retain a fragment of his former empire — the island of Elba off the coast of Tuscany ; and from Elba he had looked on at the quarrels which sprang up between his conquerors as soon as they gathered at Vienna to complete the settlement of Europe. The most formidable of these quarrels arose from the claim of Prussia to annex Saxony, and that of Russia to annex Poland ; but their union for this purpose was met by a counter-league of England and Austria with their old enemy France, whose ambassador, Talleyrand, laboured vigorously to bring the contest to an issue by force of arms. At the moment, however, when a war between the two leagues seemed close at hand. Napoleon quitted Elba, landed on the coast near Mafch i, Cannes, and, followed only by a thousand of his guards, marched over the mountains of Dauphine upon Grenoble and L}-ons. He counted, and counted justly, on the indifference of the country to its new Bourbon rulers, on the longing of the army for a fresh struggle which should restore its glory, and above all on the spell of his name over soldiers whom he had so often led to victor)-. In twenty days from his landing he reached the Tuilerics unopposed, while Lewis the Eighteenth fled helplessly to Ghent. But whatever hopes he had drawn from the divisions of the Allicti Powers were at once dispelled by their resolute action on the news of his descent upon France. Their strife was hushed and their old union restored by the consciousness of a common danger. An engagement to su[)i)ly a million of men for the puri)()scs of the war, and a recall of their armies to the Rhine, answered Napoleon's efforts to open negotiations with the Powers. England furnished subsidies to the amount of eleven millions, and hastened to place an army on the frontier of the Netherlands. The best troops ot the force which had been employed in the Peninsula. howe\cr, i824 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Sec. IV were still across the Atlantic ; and of the eighty thousand men The who gathered round Wellington only about a half were English- War with Krance men, the rc.-^t principal!}' raw levies from l^elgium and Hanover. to"' The Duke's plan was to unite with the one hundred and fifty r thousand Prussians under Marshal Blucher who were advancing on the Lower Rhine, and to enter France by Mons and Namur, while the forces of Austria and Russia closed in upon Paris by way of Bel fort and P^lsass. Waterloo -^^^^ Napoleon had thrown aside all thought of a merely dcfensi\-e war. B\' amazing efforts he had raised an army of two hundred and fifty thousand men in the few months since his 1S15 arrival in Paris ; and in the opening of June one hundred and twenty thousand Frenchmen were concentrated on the Sambre at Charleroi, while Wellington's troops still lay in cantonments on the line of the Scheldt from Ath to Nivelle, and Blucher's on that of the Meuse from Nivelle to Liege. Both the allied armies hastened to unite at Ouatre Bras ; but their junction was already impossible. Blucher with eighty thousand men was himself attacked by Napoleon at Ligny, and after a desperate contest Juucie driven back with terrible loss upon Wavre. On the same day Ney with twenty thousand men, and an equal force under D'Erlon in reserve, appeared before Ouatre Bras, where as }'et onl}^ ten thousand English and the same force of Belgian troops had been able to assemble. The Belgians broke before the charges of the French horse ; but the dogged resistance of the English infantry gave time for Wellington to bring up corps after corps, till at the close of the day Ney saw himself heavily outnumbered, and withdrew baffled from the field. About five thousand men had fallen on either side in this fierce engagement : but heavy as was Wellington's loss, the firmness of the English army had already done much to foil Napoleon's effort at breaking through the line of the Allies. Blucher's retreat, however, left the English flank uncovered ; and on the following day, while the Prussians were falling back on Wavre, Wellington with nearly seventy thousand men — for his army was now well in hand — withdrew in good order upon Waterloo, followed by the mass of the French forces under the Emperor himself. Napoleon had detached ^Marshal Grouchy Avith thirt}' thousand men to hang upon the rear of the beaten MODERN ENGLAND Prussians, while with a force of eighty thousand he resolved to bring Wellington to battle. On the morning of the i8th of June the two armies faced one another on the field of Waterloo, in front of the Forest of Soignies, on the high road to Brussels. Napoleon's one fear had been that of a continued retreat. " I have them ! " he cried, as he saw the English line drawn up on a low rise of ground which stretched across the liich road from the 1S25 Sec. IV The War with FKANXt: 1793 TO I815 ^^^■^rxCi.- .-*,• HOUGOMONT. After J. M. Vy. Turner. chateau of Hougomont on its right to the farm and straggling village of La Haye Sainte on its left. lie had some grounds for his confidence of success. On either side the forces numbered between .seventy and eighty thousand men ; but the I-'rench were superior in guns and cavalry, and a large part of Wellington's force consisted of Belgian levies, who broke and net! at the outset of the fight. A fierce attack ujion Ilougomont ()])cnc(l ihc h.itllo at eleven; but it was not till midda)' that the corps of h'l'.iion 1793 i8i5 1826 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE char Sec. IV advanced upon the centre near La Have Sainte, which from that The time bore the main brunt of the struG^Gic. Never has f^reater War with ^^ =^ France couragc, whcthcr of attack or endurance, been shown on any field than was shown by both combatants at Waterloo, The columns of D'Erlon, repulsed by the English foot, were hurled back in disorder by a charge of the Scots Greys ; but the victorious horsemen were crushed in their turn by the French cuirassiers, and the mass of the French cavalry, twelve thousand strong, flung itself in charge after charge on the English front, carrying the English guns and sweeping with desperate bravery round the unbroken squares whose fire thinned their ranks. With almost equal bravery the French columns of the centre again advanced^ wrested at last the farm of La Hayc Sainte from their opponents, and pushed on vigorously though in vain under Ncy against the troops in its rear. But meanwhile every hour was telling against Napoleon. To win the battle he must crush the English army before Blucher joined it ; and the English army was still un- crushed. Terrible as was his loss, and many of his regiments were reduced to a mere handful of men, Wellington stubbornly held his ground while the Prussians, advancing from W'avre through deep and miry forest roads, were slowly gathering to his support, disregarding the attack on their rear by which Grouchy strove to hold them back from the field. At half-past four their advanced guard deployed at last from the woods ; but the main body was far behind, and Napoleon was still able to hold his ground against them till their increasing masses forced him to stake all on a desperate effort against the English front. The Imperial Guard — his only reserve, and which had as )'et taken no part in the battle — was drawn up at seven in two huge columns of attack. The first, with Ney himself at its head, swept all before it as it mounted the rise beside La Haye Sainte, on which the thin English line still held its ground, and all but touched the English front when its mass, torn by the terrible fire of musketry with which it was received, gave way before a charge. The second, three thousand strong, advanced with the same courage over the slope near Hougomont, only to be repulsed and shattered in its turn. At the moment when these masses fell slowly and doggedly back down the fatal rise, the Prussians pushed forward on MODERN ENGLAND 1S27 Napoleon's right, their guns swept the road to Charleroi, and Wellington seized the moment for a general advance. From that hour all was lost. Only the Guard stood firm in the wreck of the French army ; and though darkness and exhaustion checked the English in their pursuit of the broken troops as they hurried from the field, the Prussian horse continued the chase through the night. Only forty thousand Frenchmen with some thirty guns recrossed the Sambre, while Napoleon himself fled hurriedly to Paris. His second abdication was followed by the triumphant entry of the English and Prussian armies into the French capital ; and the long war ended with his exile to St. Helena, and the return of Lewis the Eighteenth to the throne of the Bourbons. Sec. IV The War with Franxe 1793 TO 1815 THE " Bi: LLEkOI'HO.N " (sllll' WHICH (AKKIKD .NAl'ULKO.N TO ST. IIICI.ICNA). After J. M. 11: I nrncr. Vol. IV— I'AKT 39 ^' '' CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1829 THE HAT-FIXISHliRS IN COMBINATION, 182O. Flint in Place MSS., Bfitisk Mnsctim. EPILOGUE. 1873 With the victory of Waterloo we reach a time within the EnLociE memory of some now Hving, and the opening of a period of our 1815 history, the greatest indeed of all in real importance and interest, but perhaps too near to us as yet to admit of a cool and purel}- historical treatment. In a work such as the present at an\' rate it will be advisable to limit ourselves from this point to a brief summary of the more noteworthy events which have occurred in our political histor)' since 1815. The peace which closed llie great war with Napoleon left liritain feverish and exhausted. Of her conquests at sea she retained only Malta rwho.se former pos.sessors, the Knights of St. John, had cca.sed to exist), the Dutch colonics of Ceylon and the Cape of Good Hope, the l^rcnch Colony of Mauritius, and a feu- West India islands. On the other hand, the pressure of the hcav\' taxation and of the debt, which now reached ^'i-lit hundred millions, was embitteretl b\' the general distress of the eountr)-. o li J The Peace CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 183 1 The rapid development of English industry for a time ran ahead EnLocuE of the world's demands ; the markets at home and abroad were 1815 TO glutted with unsaleable goods, and mills and manufactories were 1873 brought to a standstill. The scarcity caused by a series of bad harvests was intensified b)- the selfish legislation of the landowners in Parliament. Conscious that the prosperity of English agricul- ture was merely factitious, and rested on the high price of corn produced by the war, they prohibited by an Act pa.ssed in 181 5 the introduction of foreign corn till wheat had reached famine prices. Societ}', too, was disturbed by the great changes of em- plo}'ment consequent on a sudden return to peace after twenty years of war, and b}- the disbanding of the immense forces employed at sea and on land. The movement against machinery which had been put down in 181 2 revived in formidable riots, and the distress of the rural poor brought about a rapid increase of crime. The steady opposition too of the Administration, in which Lord Castlereagh's influence was now supreme, to any project of political progress created a dangerous irritation which brought to the front men whose demand of a " radical reform " in English institutions won them the name of Radicals, and drove more violent agitators into treasonable disaffection and silly plots. In 1 8 19 the breaking up b\' military force of a meeting at Manchester, assembled for the purpose of advocating a reform in Parliament, increased the unpopularity of the Government ; and a plot of some desperate men with Arthur Thistlcwood at their '^20 head for the assassination of the whole Ministry, which is known as the Cato Street Conspiracy, threw light on the violent temper which was springing up among its more extreme opponent?;. The death of George the Third in 1820, and the accession of his son the Prince Regent as George the P^ourth, onl}- added to the general disturbance of men's minds. The ne\v' King had long since for- saken his wife and privately charged her with infidelity ; his first act on mounting the throne was to renew his accusations against her, and to lay befijre Parliament a bill for the dissoliitioii nf lu'r marriage with him. The public agitation which followed on this step at last forced the Ministry to abandon the bill, but the shame of the royal family and the unpopularity of the King increased the sfencral discontent of the countrs'. IS3: HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Epilogue 1815 TO IS73 Canninsr 1S20 The real danger to public order, however, lay only in the blind opposition to all political change which confused wise and moderate projects of reform with projects of revolution ; and in 1822 the suicide of Lord Castlereagh, who had now become Marquis of Londonderry, and to whom this opposition was mainly due, put an end to the policy of mere resistance. Canning became Foreign Secretary in Castlereagh's place, and with Canning returned the earlier and progressive policy of William Pitt. Abroad, his first act was to break with the " Holy Alliance," as it called itself, which the continental courts had formed after the overthrow of Napoleon for the repression of revolutionary or liberal movements in their kingdoms, and whose despotic policy had driven Naples, Spain, and Portugal into revolt. Canning asserted the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of foreign states, a principle he enforced by sending troops in 1826 to defend Portugal from Spanish intervention, while he recognized the revolted colonies of Spain in South America and Mexico as independent states. At home his influence was seen in the new strength gained b}- the question of Catholic P!mancipation, and in the passing of a bill for giving relief to Roman Catholics through the House of Commons in 1825. With the entry of his friend Mr. Huskisson into office in 1823 began a commercial policy which was founded on a conviction of the benefits derived from freedom of trade, and which brought about at a later time the repeal of the Corn Laws. The new drift of public policy produced a division among the Ministers which showed itself openly at Lord Liverpool's death in 1827. Canning became First Lord of the Treasur\-, but the Duke of Wellington, Avith the Chancellor, Lord Eldon, and the Home Secretary, Mr. Peel, refused to serve under him ; and four months after the formation of Canning's ?*Iinistry it was broken up by his death. A temporar}- [Ministry formed under Lord Goderich on Canning's principles was at once weakened by the position of foreign affairs. A revolt of the Greeks against Turke\' had now- lasted some }'ears, in spite of Canning's efforts to bring about peace, and the despatch of an Egyptian expedition with orders to devastate the Morea and carry off its inhabitants as slaves forced England, France, and Russia to interfere. In 1827 their united fleet under Admiral Codringrton attacked and destro\-cd that of MODERN ENGLAND 1S33 Egypt in the bay of Navarino ; but the blow at Turkey was Epilogue disapproved by English opinion, and the Ministry, already wanting 1S15 in Parliamentary strength, was driven to resign. 1873 The formation of a purely Tory IMinistr}- by the Duke of Reform Wellington, with Mr. Peel for its principal support in the D A .N I K I, O C 1 1 N N i: I. I- Miniature t'y M ulrcnin. REPEAL BUTTON. REPEAL IIUTTOX. Commons, was generally looked on as a promise of utter resistance to all further progress, l^ut the state of Ireland, where a " Catholic Association" formed b>' Daniel O'Conncll maintained a L;r<)\ving agitation, had now reached a point wjicn tin- l'Jii;h'^h Miiiistr\' had to choose between concessions and ci\il war. The l)ukr L;ave wa)', CHAP. X MODERN ENGLAND 1S35 and brought in a bill which, like that designed by Pitt, admitted epilogif. Roman Catholics to Parliament, and to all but a few of the highest 1815 posts, civil or military, in the service of the Crown. The passing 1S73 of this bill b\' the aid of the Whigs threw the Tory party into 1829 confusion ; while the cry for Parliamentar}- Reform was suddenly revived with a strength it had never known before by a Revolution 1830 in P^rancc, which drove Charles the Tenth from the throne and called his cousin, Louis Philippe, the Duke of Orleans, to reign as a Constitutional King. William the Fourth, who succeeded to the crown on the death of his brother, George the Fourth, at this moment was favourable to the demand of Reform, but Wellington refused all concession. The refusal drove him from office ; and for the first time after twenty years the Whigs saw themselves again in power under the leadership of Earl Grey. A bill for Parlia- mentary Reform, which took away the right of representation from fifty-six decayed or rotten boroughs, gave the 143 members it gained to counties or large towns which as yet sent no members to Parliament, established a ^10 householder qualification for voters in boroughs, and extended the county franchise to lease- holders and copyholders, was laid before Parliament in 1831. On its defeat the Ministry appealed to the country. The new House of Commons at once passed the bill, and so terrible was the agitation produced by its rejection b\- the Lords, that on its subsequent reintroduction the Peers who opposed it withdrew and juue i, suffered it to become law. The Reformed Parliament which met ^~ in 1833 did much by the violence and inexperience of man}' of its new members, and especiall)' by the conduct of O'Connell, to produce a feeling of reaction in the country. On the resignation of Lord Gre\' in 1834 the Ministry was reconstituted under the leadership of X'iscount Melbourne ; and though this administration was soon dismissed by the King, whose sympathies had now veered Xov. 1834 round to the Tories, and succeeded for a short time by a Ministry under Sir Robert Peel, a general election again returned a Whig Parliament, and replaced Lord Melbourne in office. Weakened , )/>/•// 1S35 as it was by the growing change of political feeling throughout the countr)', no ]\Tinistr\' has ever wrought greater and more beneficial changes than tb.e Whig Ministry under Loni (ii-e\- and Lord Melbourne during its ten wars of nilc In 1833 the s\-stc!n of 1836 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Epilogue slavery which Still cxistcd in the British 1815 colonies, though the Slave Trade was sup- 1873 pressed, was abolished at a cost of twenty millions; the commercial monopoly of the East India Company was abolished, and the trade to the East thrown open to all 1831-1S41 merchants. In 1834 the growing evil of pauperism was checked by the enactment of a New Poor Law. In 1835 the Muni cipal Corporations Act restored to the inhabitants of towns those rights of self- government of which they had been de- prived since the fourteenth century. 1836 saw the passing of the General Registra- tion Act, while the constant quarrels over tithe were remedied by the Act for Tithe Commutation, and one of the grievances of Dissenters redressed by a measure , which allowed civil marriage, A system of national education, begun in 1834 b\- a small annual grant towards the erec- tion of schools, was developed in 1839 by the creation of a Committee of the STAFFORDSHIRE COLLIERS. Penny Magazine, 1836. MANCHESTER OPERATIVE. Illustrated London News, 1842. Privy Council for edu- cational pur- poses and by the steady increase of educational grants. Great how- ever as these measures were, the difficulties of the Whig Minis- try grew stead- ily year by year. Ireland, where O'Connell main- tained an inces- MODERN ENGLAND 1S37 sant agitation for the Repeal of the Union, could only be held ep.logc down by Coercion Acts. In spite of the impulse given to trade isTs TO Peel T}IE "KUCKEl," 1829. b\- the system of steam communication which began with the opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway in 1830. the "GKKAIEK BKIIAIN, ' iSyj. country still suffered from distress : and the discontent of the poorer classes gave rise in i- which followed that of Lord :\Ielbournc. enabled him to deal ^^39 Epilogue 1S15 TO 18 /i VISCOUNT MELBOURNK. Picture by Sir T. Lawrtnce. vigorously with two of the difficulties which had most hampcrcil his predecessors. The disorder of the public finances was repaired by the repeal of a host of oppressive and useless duties and by the imposition of an Income Tax. In Irelaml O'Conncll was charged with .sedition and convicted, and though subsequently released from prison on appeal to the Ilou.sc of Lords, his inlhiencc 1840 IIISIOKV OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. Ei-iLOGiE received a shock from which it never recovered. Peace was made 1815 with China h\' a treaty which threw open some of its ports to 1873 traders of all nations ; in India the disaster of Cabul was avenged b\- an expedition under General Pollock which penetrated GREAT SEAL OF QUEEN VICTORIA. (Obverse.) victoriously to the capital of that country in 1842, and the province 1S45-1S46 of Scinde was annexed to the British dominions. The shock, however, to the English power brought about fresh struggles for suprcmac}' with the natives, and especially with the Sikhs, who MODERN ENGLAND 1S41 were crushed for the time in three great battles at Moodkee, Emlogie Ferozeshah, and Sobraon. 1815 Successful as it proved itself abroad, the Conservative Govern- 1873 ment encounted unexpected difficulties at home. From the Free- Trade GREAT SEAL OF QUKF.N VICTOKIA. (kcvcrsi;.) enactment of the Corn Laws in 1S15 a dispute had conslantl)- gone on between those who advocated these and similar measures as a protection to nali\c indusli)- and those who, vicwini; tlu-ni as sim[)lv Ia)-ing a tax on the c(;n^umcr lor the Ijcnefil of tin- pro- i842 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. EiiLOGLE duccr, claimed entire freedom of trade with the world. In 1839 an 1815 Anti-Corn- Law Lca- a Whig 1873 Ministry under Lord John Russell, which remained in power till 1852. The first work of this Ministry was to carry out the policy of free trade into every department of British commerce ; and from •SSELL. Bust by John J-raitcis, in Aalional J'ortrtiit Gallery. that time to this the maxim of the League, to " bu\- in the cheapest market and sell in the dearest," has been accepted as the law of our commercial policy. Other events were few. Tlic general over throw of the continental monarchs in the Re\olution of i84hotograpIi. by John Watkins. his poHcy was one of pure inaction ; and his whole energy was directed to the preservation of English neutrality in five great strifes which distracted not only Europe but the New World — a war between France and Austria in 1859 which ended in the creation of the kingdom of Italy, a civil war in America which began with the secession of the Southern States in 1861 and ended four years later in their subjugation, an insurrection of Poland in X MODERN ENGLAND 1847 1863, an attack of France upon Mexico, and of Austria and Epilogue Prussia upon Denmark in 1864. The American war, by its inter- 1815 TO ference with the supply of cotton, reduced Lancashire to distress ; 1873 while the fitting out of piratical cruisers in English harbours in the name of the Southern Confederation gave America just grounds for an irritation which was only allayed at a far later time. Peace, however, was successfully preserved ; and the policy of non- intervention was pursued after Lord Palmerston's death by his successor. Lord Russell, who remained neutral during the brief but decisive conflict between Prussia and Austria in 1866 which transferred to the former the headship of Germany. With Lord Palmerston, however, passed away the policy of The political inaction which distinguished his rule. Lord Russell had formers' long striven to bring about a further reform of Parliament ; and in 1866 he laid a bill for that purpose before the House of Commons, whose rejection was followed by the resignation of the Ministry. Lord Derby, who again became Prime Minister, with Mr, Disraeli as leader of the House of Commons, found himself however driven to introduce in 1867 a Reform Bill of a far more sweeping character than that which had failed in Lord Russell's hands. By this measure, which passed in August, the borough franchise was extended to all ratepayers, as well as to lodgers occupying rooms of the annual value of ^10 ; the county franchise was fixed at £12, thirty-three members were withdrawn from English boroughs, twenty-five of whom were transferred to English counties, and the rest assigned to Scotland and Ireland. Large numbers of the 1867 working classes were thus added to the constituencies ; and the indirect effect of this great measure was at once seen in the vigorous policy of the Parliament which assembled after the new elections in 1868. Mr. Disraeli, who had become Prime Minister on the withdrawal of Lord Derby, retired quietly on finding that a Liberal majority of over one hundred members had been returned to the House of Commons ; and his place was taken by Mr. Gladstone, at the head of a Ministry which for the first time included every section of the Liberal party. A succession of great measures proved the strength and energy of the new administration. Its first work was with Ireland, whose chronic discontent it en- deavoured to remove b)' the disestablishment and disenclowmcnt 184S HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE chap. Epilogie of the Protestant Church in 1869, and by a Land Bill which estab- 1815 lished a sort of tenant-right in every part of the country in 1870. 1873 The claims of the Nonconformists were met in 1868 by the abolition of compulsory church-rates, and in 1871 b}- the abolition PiENJAMIX DISRAELI, EARL OF BEACONSFIELD. Bust by Sir E. J. Boehiii. of all religious tests for admission to offices or degrees in the L'niversities. Important reforms were undertaken in the manage- ment of the navy ; and a plan for the entire reorganization of the army was carried into effect after the system of promotion to its command by purchase had been put an end to. In 1870 theques- MODERN ENGLAND 1849 tion of national education was furthered by a bill which provided epilogue for the establishment of School Boards in every district, and for 1815 their support by means of local rates. In 1872 a fresh step in 1873 Parliamentary reform was made by the passing of a measure which THE RIGHT HON. W. E. GLAH^l'M Engraved by W. Biscotnbc Gardner from a J>liolo^>'a/>/i by S. A H'n/ki enabled the votes of electors to be given in secret by means of the ballot. The greatness and rapidity of these changes, however, produced so rapid a reaction in the minds of the constituencies 1850 HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CHAP. X epilogie that on the failure of his attempt to pass a bill for organizing the 1815 higher education of Ireland, Mr. Gladstone felt himself forced TO 1873 in 1874 to consult public opinion by a dissolution of Parliament ; and the return of a Conservative majority of nearly .seventy members was necessarily followed by his retirement from office, Mr. Disraeli again becoming First Minister of the Crown. ^ I. England. 2. Scotland. Gklat Ckitain. 4. Ireland. 5. Great Britain AND Ireland. THE UNIO.\ FLAG. CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS ENGLISH HISTORY CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS OF ENGLISH HISTORY THE ENGLISH KINGDOMS 449— 1016 449 Enerlish land in Britain. I 664 457 Kent conquered by English. 477 Landing of South Saxons. 668 491 Siege of Anderida. 495 Landing of West Saxons. 670 519 Cerdic and Cynric, Kings of West Saxons. j 675 520 British victory at Mount Badon. ' 681 547 Ida founds l':ingdom of Bernicia. , 682 552 West Saxons take Old Sarum. i 560 .ffithelberht, King of Kent, died 6i6. | 685 568 driven back by West Saxons. ( 571 West Saxons march into Mid-Britain. 688 577 conquer at Deorham. 715 584 • defeated at Faddiley. 588 .ffitlielric creates Kingdom of North- 716 umbria. 733 593 .ffithelfrith, King of Northumbria, 735 died 617. 753 597 Augustine converts Kent. 754 603 Battle of Dajgsastan. 613 liattle of Chester. 756 617 Eadivine, King of Northumbria, died 758 633- 775 626 overlord of Britain. 779 Penda, Kingof the Mercians, died 655. 786 627 Ladwine becomes Christian. 633 — slain at Hatfield. 787 635 Os'veald, King of Bernicia, died 642. — defeats Welsh at Hevenfeld. 796 Aldan settles at Holy Island. 802 Conversion of Wessex. 642 ' )s\vald slain at Maserfeld. 803 651 Oswriu, Kingof .\orthumbria, diedGyo. 655 victory at Winwied. 808 658 Wc-.t Saxons conquerasfarasthe I'arret. 659 "Wulfhere, King in Mercia. 815 661 drivc-j West Saxons over 'J'Ikiuics, Council of W^hitby. Cadmon at Whitby. Theodore made Archbishop of Canter- bury. Ecgfrith, King of Northumbria, died 685. .Slthelred, King of Mercia, died 704 Wilfred converts South Saxons. Centwine of Wessex conquers Mid- Somerset. Ecgfrith defeated and slain at Nectans- mere. Ine, King of West Saxons, died 726. defeats Ceolred of Mercia at Wan- borough. .a:thelbald, King of Mercia, died 757. Mercian conquest of Wessex. Death of Bdda. Death of Boniface. Wessex recovers freedom in battle of Burford. Eadbcrht of Northumbria takes Alcluyd. Offa, King of Mercia, died 796. — subdues Kentish men at Otford. defeats West Saxons at Bcnsington. — ■ places Beorhtric on throne of Wessex. — — creates Archbishopric at Lichfield. First landing of Danes in England. Cenwnlf, King of Mercia, died 82 1. EcRberht becomes King in Wessex, died S59. (Vinvulf suppresses Archbishopric of Lichfield. Charles the Creat restores Eardwulf in Northumbria. Ecgberht siil)ducb the West Welsh to the Taiiiar. 1^54 CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS 821 825 827 828 837 839 8A9 851 853 855 857 860 866 867 868 870 871 874 876 877 878 883 886 893 894 Civil war in Mercia. 895 1 .cgberht defeats Mercians at Eliamlim. 896 — overlord of England south of 897 Thames. Revolt of East Anglia against Mercia. 901 1 )efeat of Mercians hy East Anglians. 912 Mercia and \orthunibria submit to 913 1 Ecgberht. 918/ Ecgberht overlord of all English king- 921 donis. invades Wales. , 924- defeats Danes at Hengestesdun. | ^thelwulf, KingofWessex, died 85S. I 925 AAUxd l.oi-n. 926 1 )anes defeated at Aclea. | 934 .Elfrcd sent to Rome. ; 937 .l-"thelwulf goes to Rome. 940 .ffithelbald, KingofWessex, died 860. 943 .fflthelberht, King of Wessex, died 945 St)(). .ffithelred, King of Wessex, died 871. 946 I )ancs conquer Xorthumbria. ' 954 Peace of Nottingham with Danes. 955 Danes conquer and settle in East | 956 Anglia. j 957 Danes invade Wessex. | 958 .ffilfred, King of Wessex, died 901. 959 I )anes conquer Mercia. 975 I )anes settle in Xorthumbria. 978 .i:ifred defeats Danes at Exeter. 987 Danes overrun Wessex. 1040 .Elfred victor at Edington. 994 Peace of Wedmore. 1002 .Elfred sends envoys to Rome and 1003 India. 1012 .•l'21fred takes and refortifies I,ondon. 1013 Danes reappear in Thames and Kent. -Elfred drives Hasting from Wessex. 1016 Masting invades Mercia. .Elfred drives Danes from Essex. I lasting quits England. .Elfred creates a tleel. £adward the Elder, died 925. Xorlhnien settle in Xormandy. . Ethel fltcd conquers Danish Mercia. Eadward subdues East Anglia and Essex. owned as overlord by Xorthumbria, Scots, and Straihclyde. .Sthelstan, died 940. ■ drives Welsh from Exeter. in\a(les Scotland. \'ictoiy of Brunanburh. Eadmund, died 946. 1 )unslan made Al)bot of Cllastonbury. Cumberland granted to Malcolm, King of Scots. Eadred, died 955. makes X'orthumbria nn earldom. EadTvig, died 959. ISanishment of Dunstan. Revolt of Mercia under Eadgar. Eadgar, died 975. Duiutaii Archbishop of Canfcrbury. Ead^rard the Martyr, tiled 978. .Sthelred the Unready, died 1016. Fulk the Black, Count of Anjou. Invasion of Swein. Massacre of Danes. Swein harries Wessex. Murder of Archbishop .Einieah. All England submits to Swein. Flight of .Ethelred to Xormandy. Eadmund Ironside, King, and dies. ENGLAND UNDER FOREIGN KINGS 1016 1020 1027 1035 1037 1040 1040 1060 1042 1045 1047 1051 1052 1053 1054 1016— 1204 Cnut, King, died 1035. 1055 (iodwine made Earl of Wessex. 1054 1 Cnut goes to Rome. 1060 j Birth of William of X^'ormandy. 1058 Harald and Harthacnut divide Eng- 1060 land. 1063 Harald, King, died 1040. 1066 Harthacnut, King, died 1042. (Jeoftry Marlel, Count of Anjou. Eadward the Confessor, died 1066. Lanf ratio at Bee. 1068'^ Victory of William at Val-es-dunes. 1071 j Banishment of Godwine. 1070 William of Xormandy visits England. Return of Godwine. 1075 Death of Godwine. 1081 Harold made Earl of West Saxons. 1085 William's victory at Mortemer. 1086 Harold's first campaign in Wales. X'orman conquest of Southern Italy. William's victory at the Dive. X'ormans invade Sicily. Harold conquers Wales. Harold, King. conquers at Stamford Bridge. defeated at .Senlac or Hastings. William of X'ormandy, King, died 10S7. X'orman Conquest of England. Reorganization of the Church. Laitfrano Archbishop of Canterbury'. Rising of Roger Fit/.-C).sbern. William invades Wales. Failure of Danish invasion. Completion of Domesday Book. CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS 1855 1087 ^Villianl the Red, died iioo. 1093 Aiisel/ii, Archbishop. 1094 Revolt of Wales against the Norman Marchers. 1095 Revolt of Robert de Mowbray. 1096 Xorniandy left in pledge to William. 1097 William invades Wales. Anselm lea^■es England. 1098 ^\'ar with France. 1100 Henry the First, died 1135. Henry's Charter. 1101 Robert of Xormandy invades England. 1106 Settlement of question of investitures. English Conquest of Normandy. iisa ) Fulk of Jerusalem, Count of Anjou. 1110 War with France. mi War with Anjou. 1113 Peace of Gisors. 1114 Marriage of Matilda with Henry V. 1120 Wreck of White Ship. 1121 Henrys campaign in Wales. 1123 Revolt of Norman baronage. 1124 France and Anjou support William Clito. 1128 Matilda married to Geoffry of Anjou. Death of the Clito in F"]anders. 1134 Revolt of Wales. 1135 Stephen of Biois, died 1154. 1138 Normandy repulses the Angevins. Revolt of Earl Robert. ]5attle of the Standard. 1139 Seizure of the Bishops. Landing of Matilda. 1141 Battle of Lincoln. 1 1 47 Bir/h of Gerald of Wales. 1148 Matilda withdraws to Normand). Archbishop Theobald driven into exile. 1149 1151 1152 1153 1154 1159 1162 1164 1166 1170 1172 1173 ^ 1174 / 1176 1178 1181 1189 1190 \ 1194 j 1194 \ 1196 / 1194 ) 1246 / 1197 1199 1200 1203 1204 Henry of Anjou in England. Henry becomes Duke of Normandy. Henry marries Eleanor of Guienne. Henry in England. Treaty of Wallingford. Henry the Second, died 1189. Expedition against Toulouse. The Great Scutage. Thomas made Archbishop of Canter- bury. Constitutions of Clarendon. Council of Northampton. Flight of Archbishop Thomas. Assize of Clarendon. Strongbow's invasion of Ireland. Inquest of Sheriffs. Death of Archbishop Thomas. Henry's Conquest of Ireland. Rebellion of Henry's sons. Assize of Northampton. Reorganization of Curia Regis. Assize of Arms. Revolt of Richard. Richard the First, died 1 1 99. Richard's Crusade. War with Philip Augustus. Llewellyn - ap - Jorwerth in North Wales. Richard builds Chateau Gaillard. John, dies 121 6. • recovers Anjou and Maine. Layanwu writes the Brut. Murder of Arthur. French conquest of Anjou and Normandy. THE GREAT CHARTER 1204—1295 1205 1206 1208 1210 1211 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 Barons refuse to fight for recovery of Normandy. Stephen Lauglou Archbishop of Canterbury. Innocent HI. ])Uts I^ngland under Interdict. John divides Irish Pale into counties. John reduces Llevvellyn-ap-Jorwerth to submission. John becomes the Pope's vassal. 15attle of Bouvines. Birth of Roi^er Bacon. The Great Charter. Lewis of F'rancc called in by the Barons. Henry the Third, died 1272. ConfirtijaliDn fiflhc Charter. Lewis returns to France. Charter again confirmed. 1219 Hubert de Burgh, Justiciar. 1221 Friars land in Eii^land. 1223 Charter again confirmed at London. 1224 Revolt ofVaukes de Breaute. 1225 Fresh confirmation of Charter. 1228 Stephen Langt(m's deatli. 1229 Pajial exactions. 1230 I'aihireof Henry's cam])aigninl\)itou. 1231 Consjiiracv against the Italian Clergy. 1232 I'all of Hubert de Burgh. 1237 Charter again confirmed. 1238 ICarl Simon of 1-eicester marries Henry's sister. 1242 Defeat of Henry at Taiilebourg. I'aroiis refuse subsidies. 1246 ) Llewelyn-a|)-Gruffydd, Prince in 1283 ( North Wales. 1248 Irisli refusal of subsidies. Earl Simon in Gascony. 1856 CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS 1253 I'arl Simon returns to England. 1282 Conquest of Wales. 1258 I'rovisions of Oxford. 1283 Statute of Merchants. 1264 Mise of Amiens. 1285 Statute of Winchester. Battle of Lewes. 1290 .Statute " Quia Emptores." 1265 Commons summoned to Parliament. Exj^ulsion of the Jews. Battle of Evesham. Marriage Treaty of Brigham. 1267 A'i>i,'i-r Bacon -writes his " Opus 1291 Parliament at Norham concerning Majus. " Llewelyn-ap-Gruffydd owned as -Scotch succession. 1292 Edward claims appeals from Scotland. Prince of Wales. Death of Roger Bacon. 1270 1 xiward goes on Crusade. 1294 Seizure of Guienne by Philip of 1272 Edward the First, died 1 307. Erance. 1277 Kdward reduces Llewelyn-ap-Gruffydd 1295 Erench fleet attacks Dover. to submission. Einal organization of the English 1279 Statute of Mortmain. Parliament. THE WAR WITH SCOTLAND AND FRANCE 1296 1297 1298 1301 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1310 1312 1314. 1316 1318 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1332 1333 1335 1 1336 1336 1337 1338 1296—1485 Edward conquers Scotland. ' 1339 Victory of Wallace at Stirling. Outlawry of the Clergy. 1340 Barons refuse to serve in Guienne. 1341 "\ Edward conquers Scots at Falkirk. 1342 j Truce with France. 1346 Barons demand nomination of Minis- 1347 ters by Parliament. Barons exact fresh Confirmation of 1348 the Charters. 1349 ) Submission of Scotland. 1351 I Parliament of Perth. 1351 Rising of Robert Bruce. 1353 Parliament of Carlisle. 1355 Edward the Second, died 1327. 1356 Gaveston exiled. 1366 The Lords Ordainers draw up Articles 1367 of Reform. Death of Gaveston. 1368 Battle of Bannockburn. 1370 Battle of Athenree. 1372 Edward accepts the Ordinances. 1374 Death of Earl of Lancaster. Ordin- 1376 ances annulled. 1377 Truce with the Scots. French attack Aquitaine. The Queen and Prince Edward in Erance. Queen lands in England. 1378 Deposition of Edward IL Edward the Third, died 1377. 1380 Treaty of Northampton recognizes 1381 independence of Scotland. Death of Robert Bruce. Death of Roger Mortimer. 1382 Edward Balliol invades Scotland. Battle of Halidon Hill. 1384 Balliol does homage to Edward. 1386 Edward invades Scotland. laaa France again declares war. 1394 W^ar with France and .Scotland. , Edward claims crown of France. 1397 Balliol driven from Scotland. P^dward attacks France from Brabant. Battle of Sluys. War in Brittany and Guienme. Battles of Crecy and Neville's Cross. Capture of Calais. Truce with France. First appearance of the Black Death. Statutes of Labourers. First Statute of Provisors. First Statute of Pra2munire. Renewal of French War. Battle of Poitiers. Statute of Kilkenny. The Black Prince victorious at Navarete. Wyclifs treatise " De Domitiio." Storm of Limoges. Victory of Spanish fleet off Rochelle, Revolt of Aquitaine. The Good Parliament. Its work undone by the Duke of Lancaster. Wyclif before the Bishop of Lon- don. Richard the Second, died 1399. Gregory XL denounces W^yclifs heresy. LonglaiicTs " Piers the Pioughtiian.''^ Wyclifs declaration against Transub- stantiation. The Peasant Revolt. Condemnation of Wyclif at Blackfriars. Suppression of the Poor Preachers. Death of W'yclif. Barons force Richard to dismiss the Earl of Suffolk. Truce with France. Richard in Ireland. Richard marries Isabella of F" ranee. Truce with France prolonged. Murder of the Duke of Gloucester. CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS 1S57 1398 Richard's plans of tyranny. 1399 Deposition of Richard. Henry the Fourth, died 141 3. 1400 Revolt of Owen Glyndwr in Wales 1401 Statute of Heresy. 1402 Battle of Homildon Hill. 1403 Revolt of the Percies. 140S I ^^^^'^^ descents on England. 1405 Revolt of Archbishop Scrope. 1407 French attack Gascony. 1411 English force sent to aid Duke of Burgundy in France. 1413 Henry the Fifth, died 1422. 1414 Lollard Conspiracy. 1415 Battle of Agincourt. 1417 Henry invades Normandy. 1419 Alliance with Duke of Burgundy. 1420 Treaty of Troyes. 1422 Henry the Sixth, died 1471. 1424 Battle of Verneuil. 1428 1 e- f /-, 1 1429 / ^^^^ Orleans. 1430 County Suffrage restricted. 1431 Death of Joan of Arc. 1435 Congress of Arras. 1445 Marriage of Margaret of Anjou. 1447 Death of Duke of Gloucester. 1450 1451 1454 1455 1456 1459 1460 1461 1461 \ 1471 J 1464 1470 1471 1475 1476 1483 1485 Impeachment and death of Duke of Suffolk. Cade's Insurrection. Loss of Normandy. Loss of Guienne. Duke of York named Protector. First Battle of St. Albans. End of York's Protectorate. P" allure of Yorkist revolt. Battle of Northampton. York acknowledged as successor. Battle of Wakefield. Second Battle of St. Albans. Battle of Mortimer's Cross. Edward the Fourth, died 1483. Battle of Towton. Warwick the King-maker. Edward marries Lady Grey. Warwick driven to France. Flight of Edward to Flanders. Battles of Barnet and Tewkesbury. Edward invades France. Caxton settles in England. ]\Iurder of Edward the Fifth. Richard the Third, died 1485. Buckingham's Insurrection. Battle of Bosworth. THE TUDORS 1485— 1603 1485 1487 1490 1492 1497 1499 1501 1502 1505 1509 1509 1512 1513 1515 1517 1520 1521 1522 1523 1525 Henry the Seventh, died 1509. Conspiracy of Lambert Simnel. Treaty with Ferdinand and Isabella. Henry invades France. Cornish rebellion. Perkin Warbeck captured. Sebastian Cabot lands in America. Co let and Ef-asmiis at Oxford. Arthur Tudor marries Catharine of Aragon. Margaret Tudor marries James the Fourth. Colet Dean of S. Paul's. Henry the Eighth, died 1547. Erasmus writes the ' ' Praise of Eolly. " War with France. Battles of the Spurs and of Flodden. Wolsey becomes chief Minister. A/ore's " Utopia." Luther denounces Indulgences. Field of Cloth of Gold. Luther burns the Pope's Bull. ul. Miink enters I .nndnn. The '■ ( '<]ii\(ntiiin '' I'arliament. Charles the Second, lands at Dover, May, died 16S5. Union of .Scotland and Irclandundone. Cavalier Parliament begins. Act of Uniformity re-enacted. Puritan clergy driven out. A'oyal .Society at London. 6 D i86o CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS 1663 Dispensing Bill fails. 1664 Conventicle Act. 1665 Dutch War begins. Five Mile Act. Plague of London. A'c-~ui's Tlicory of Fluxions. 1666 Fire of London. 1667 The Dutch in the Medway. Dismissal of Clarendon. I'eace of Breda. Lewis attacks Flanders. Ml/ton's ''^ Faradisc Lost." 1668 The Triple Alliance. Peace of .Vix-la-Chapelle. Ashley shrinks back from toleration to Catholics. 1670 Treaty of Dover. Bunyciii's " PilgrMs Progress " wriUen. 1671 Milton's " Paradise Regained" and " Samson Agonistcs." A''ewton's Theory of Light. 1672 Closing of the Exchequer. Declaration of Indulgence. War begins with Holland. Ashley made Chancellor. 1673 Declaration of Indulgence withdrawn. The Test Act. Shaftesbury dismissed. Shaftesbury takes the lead of the Country Party. 1674 Bill of Protestant Securities fails. Charles makes Peace with Holland. Danby Lord Treasurer. 1675 Treaty of mutual aid between Charles and Lewis. 1677 Shaftesbury sent to the Tower. Bill for Security of the Church fails. Address of the Houses for War with France. Prince of Orange marries Mary. 1678 Peace of Ximeguen. Oates invents the Popish Plot. 1679 New Parliament meets. Fall of Danby. New Ministry with Shaftesbury at its head. Temple's plan for a new Council. Habeas Corpus Act passed. Exclusion Bill introduced. 1679 Parliament dissolved. Shaftesbury dismissed. 1680 Committee for agitation formed. Monmouth pretends to the throne. Petitioners ami Abhorrers. Exclusion Bill thrown out by the Lords. Trial of Lord Stafford. 1681 Parliament at Oxford. Treaty with France. Limitation Bill rejected. Shaftesbury and Monmouth arrested. 1682 Conspiracy and flight of Shaftesbury. Penn founds Penn^iylvania. 1683 Death of Shaftesbury. Rye House Plot. Execution of Lord Russell and Alger- non Sidney. 1684 Town cliarters quashed. Army increased. 1685 James the Second, died 1701. Insurrection of Argyll and Mon- mouth. Battle of Sedgemoor, July 6. The Bloody Circuit. Army raised to 20,000 men. Revocation of Edict of Nantes 1686 Test Act dispensed with by royal authority. Ecclesiastical Commission set up. 1687 Newton's '■'■ Principia." Expulsion of the Fellows of Magdalen. Dismissal of Lords Rochester and Clarendon. Declaration of Indulgence. The Boroughs regulated. William of Orange protests against the Declaration. Tyrconnell made Lord Deputy in Ireland. 1688 Clergy refuse to read the new De- claration of Indulgence. Birth of James's son. Invitation to William. Trial of the Seven Bishops. Irish troops brought over to England. Lewis attacks Germany. William, of Orange lands at Torbay. Flight of James. MODERN ENGLAND 1689—1874 1689 Convention Parliament. Declaration of Rights. 'William and Mary made King and Queen. William forms the Grand Alliance against Lewis. Battle of Killiecrankie,yi?efeat of General liraddock. 1756 Loss of Port Mahon. 1756 Retreat of Admiral Byng. 1757 Convention of Closter-Seven. Ministry of William Pitt. Battle of Plassey, June 23. 1758 Capture of Louisburg and Cape Breton. Capture of Fort Duquesne. 1759 Battle of Minden, .-i?/^?^j-/ i. Capture of Fort Niagara and Ticon- deroga. Wolfe's victory on Heights of Abraham. Battle of Quiberon Bay, Nov. 20. 1760 George the Third, died 1820. Battle of Wandewash. 1761 Pitt resigns office. Ministry of Lord Bute. Brindleyi's Canal over the Ii-well. 1763 Peace of Paris. Ministry of George Grenville. Wedgwood establishes Potteries. 1764 First expulsion of Wilkes from House of Commons. Hargreaves invents Spinning Jenny. 1765 Stamp Act passed. Ministry of Lord Rockingham. Meeting and protest of American Congress. Watt invents Steam Engine. 1766 Repeal of Stamp Act. Ministry of Lord Chatham. 1768 Ministry of the Duke of Grafton. Second expulsion of Wilkes. Arkwrigkt invents SpinningMachitic. 1769 Wilkesthree times elected for Middle- sex. House of Commons seats Col. Luttrell. Occupation of Boston by British troops. Letters of Junius. 1770 Chatham's proposal of Parliamentary Reform. Ministry of Lord North. 1771 Last attempt to prevent Parliamentary reporting. Beginning of the great English Jour- nals. 1773 Hastings appointed Governor-General. Boston tea-riots. 1774 Military occupation of Boston. Its port closed. Massachusetts Charter altered. Congress assembles at Philadelphia. 1775 Rejection of Chatham's plan of con- ciliation. Skirmish at Lexington. Americans, under Washington, besiege Boston. Battle of Bunker's Hill. Southern Colonies expel iheir Gover- nors. 1776 Croiiipton invents the Mule. Arnold invades Canada. Evacuation of IJoston. Declaration of Inde])endence, ////)' 4. Battles of Brooklyn anil Trenton. 6 D 2 i862 CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS 1776 Aiiain Smit/i's " Wealth of Nations." 1798 Irish revolt crushed at Vinegar Hill. 1777 Hattle of Brantlywinc. Battle of the Nile. Surrcndor of Saralof^a, Oct. 1 7. 1799 Pitt revives the Coalition against Chatham iJioposes I'cderal Union. France. Washington at \'alley Forge. Conquest of Mysore. 1778 AiJiancc of France and Spain with 1800 Surrender of .Malta to English Fleet. United States. Armed Neutrality of Northern Powers. Death of Chatham. Act of Union with Ireland. 1779 Siege of CihraUar. 1801 George the Third rejects Pitt's Plan Armed Neutrality of Northern of Catholic Emancipation. I'owers. Administration of Mr. Addington. The Irish Vohinteers. Surrender of French army in Egypt. 1780 Capture of Charlestown. Battle of Copenhagen. Descent of Ilyder AH on the Carnatic. 1802 Peace of Amiens. 1781 Defeat of Ilyder at Porto Novo. Publication of " Edinburgh Review." Surrender of Cornwallisat Yorktown. 1803 War declared against Buonaparte. 1782 Ministry of Lord Rockingham. Battle of Assaye. Victories of Rodney. 1804- Second Ministry of Pitt. Repeal of Poynings' Act. 1805 Battle of Trafalgar, Oct. 21. Pitt's Bill for Parliamentary Reform. 1806 Death of Pitt, yance opens the Scheldt. Battles of the Pyrenees. Pitt's efforts for peace. Wellington enters France, Oct. The United Irishmen. Americans attack Canada. 1793 France declares War on England. 1814 Battle of Orthes. Part of Whigs join Pitt. Battle of Toulouse, April 10. English army lands in Flanders. Battle of Chippewa, y«/)'. English driven from Toulon. Raid upon Washington. 1794 English driven from Holland. British re]nilses at Plattsburg and Suspension of Habeas Corpus Act. New Orleans. Victory of Lord Howe, f line i. 1815 Battle of Quatre Bras, June 16. 1796 Burke's ' ' Letters on a Regicide Peace. " Battle of Waterloo, June iS. 1797 England alone in the War with Treaty of Vienna. France. 1819 Manchester Massacre. Battle of Camperdown. 1820 Cato Street Conspiracy. Battle of Cape St. Vincent. George the Fourth, died 1830. CHRONOLOGICAL ANNALS 1863 1820 Bill for the Queen's Divorce. 1842 Peace with China. 1822 Canning Foreign Minister. Massacre of English Army in 1823 Mr. Huskisson joins the Ministry. Affghanistan. 1826 Expedition to Portugal. Victories of Pollock in Affghanistan. Recognition of South American Annexation of Scinde. States. 1845 Battles of Moodkee and Ferozeshah. 1827 Ministry of Mr. Canning. 1846 Battle of Sobraon. Ministry of Lord Goderich. Repeal of the Corn Laws. Battle of Xavarino. Ministry of Lord John Russell. 1828 Ministry of Duke of ^Yellington. 1848 Suppression of the Chartists and Irish 1829 Catholic Emancipation Bill. rebels. 1830 William the Fourth, died 1837. 1849 Victory of Goojerat. Ministry of Lord Grey. Annexation of the Punjaub. Opening of Liverpool and Manchester 1852 Ministry of Lord Derby. Raihvay. Ministry of Lord Aberdeen. 1831 Reform Agitation, 1854 Alliance with France against Russia. 1832 Parliamentary Reform Bill passed, Siege of Sebastopol. June 7. Battle of Inkermann, Nov. 5. 1833 Suppression of Colonial Slavery. 1855 Ministry of Lord Palmerston. East Indian trade thrown open. Capture of Sebastopol. 1834 Ministry of Lord Melbourne. 1856 Peace of Paris with Russia. New Poor Law. 1857 Sepoy Mutiny in Bengal. System of National Education begun. 1858 Sovereignty of India transferred to ^linistry of Sir Robert Peel. the Crown. 1835 Ministry of Lord Melbourne replaced. Volunteer movement. Municipal Corporation Act. Second Ministry of Lord Derby. 1836 General Registration Act. 1859 Second Ministry of Lord Palmerston. Civil Marriages Act. 1865 Ministry of Lord Russell. 1837 Victoria. 1866 Third Ministry of Lord Derby. 1838 Formation of Anti-Corn-Law League. 1867 Parliamentary Reform Bill. 1839 Committee of Privy Council for Edu- 1868 Ministry of Mr. Disraeli. cation instituted. Ministry of Mr. Gladstone. Demands for a People's Charter. 1869 Disestablishment of Episcopal Church Revolt in Canada. in Ireland. War with China. 1870 Irish Land Bill. Occupation of Cabul. Education Bill. 1840 Quadruple Alliance with France, 1871 Abolition of religious tests in Univer- Portugal and Spain. sities. Bombardment of Acre. Armv Bill. 184-1 Ministry of Sir Robert Peel. 1872 Ballot Bill. 1842 Income Tax revived. 1874 Second Ministry of Mr. Disraeli. GENEALOGICAL TABLES i866 GENEALOGICAL TABLES KINGS OF THE HOUSE OF CERDIC, FROM ECGBERHT ECGBERHT, r. 802-839. iETHELWULF, r. 839-857. RED -901. 1 /ETHELBALD, r. 857-860. iETHELBERHT, r. 860-866. iKTHELRED 1 r. 866-871. r. 871- = Ealhsivith. 1 EADWARD THE ELDER, r. 901-925. i ;ed, -955- th. « Emilia of Normandy ?'■ 1 iETHELSTAN, r. 925-940- 1 EADMUND, = Mlfg r. 940-946. 1 ifu. EADB r. 946- GAR, = 2. ^Elfthry 1-975- i^THELRED II. r. 978-1016. EADWIG, r. 955-959- I. MthelfliEd — EAD j r. 959 EADWARD THE MARTVR, r. 975-978. I. Name = ■uncertain Cnut, 1017-1035. 1 EADMUND IRONSIDE, r. Ap. 23-Nov. 30, 1016. ;;/. Ealdgyth. 1 Alfred, killed 1036. 1 EADWARD THE CONFESSOR, r. 1042-1066. 1 1 i ! 1 Harthacnut, r. 1040-1042. 1 Eadmund. 1 Eadward, d. 1057. »«. Agatha. 1 1 Eadgar, elected King in 1066. 1 Margaret, d. 1093. «/. Malcolm Iff. King of Scots. Matilda, d. 1118. m. Henry [. King of Kngland. Christina, a nun. THE DANISH KINGS SWEIN FORKBEARD, d. 1014. CNUT = Emma of Normandy, •widow\ r. 1016-1035. of King /Ethelred II. Swegen. HARALD, r. 1035-1040. HARTHACNUT, r. 1040-1042. Illegitimate. DUKES OF THE NORMANS DUKES OF THE NORMANS HROLF, ist Duke of the Normans, WILLIAM LONGSWORD, r. 927-943. RICHARD THE FEARLESS, r. 943-996. RICHARD THE GOOD, r. 996-1026. Emma VI. I. Mthelred II. of England. }n. 2. Cmit of England and Denmark. RICHARD III. r. 1026-1028. ROBERT THE MAGNIFICENT, r. 1028-1035. WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR, r. 1035-1087. ROBERT II. r. 1087-1096 (from 1096 to I roo the Duchy was held by his brother William), and 1100-1106 (when he was over- thrown at Tinche- brai by his brother Henry). WILLIAM RUFUS. r. 1006-1100. HENRY I. r. 1106-1135. Matilda, ?«. GEOFFRY, COUNT OF ANJOU AND MAINE (who won the Duchy from Stephen). Adela. m. Stephen, Count of Blots. STEPHEN OK ni.ois. s. 1135- HENRY II. invested with the Duchy 1151, d. ii8g. RICHARD THE I.ION HEART, r. 1189-1199. JOHN, r. II 99- 1 204 (when Normandy was conquered by France). iSCS GENEALOGICAL TABLES Claim of ED'WARD III. to the French Crown PHILIP III. THE HOLD, r. 1270-1285. PHILIP IV. THE FAIR, r. 1285-1314. Charles, Count of Valois. d. 1325. LEWIS X. r. 1314-1316. PHILIP V. THE LONG, r. 1316-1322. CHARLES IV. THE FAIR, r. 1322 — 1328. Isabel, ;//. Edward II. of En^iand. PHILIP VI. (Ji- Valols, r. 1328-1350. JOHN I. 15 Nov.-ig Nov. 1316. Edward III. of England. JOHN II. THE c;oou. r. 1350-1364. Descent of HENRY IV. HENRY III. EDWARD I. Edmund Earl of Lancaster. EDWARD II. EDWARD III. Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, beheaded 1322. Henry, Earl of Lancaster. Henry, Duke of Lancaster. John of Gaunt, = Blanche Duke of Lancaster. I of Lancaster HENRY IV. HOUSE OF YORK 1869 SO >3 S rt c 2" •5 O -g bjo ^ XI § rt ^ -^ 17^ i? 5 <^ .0 ^^ «' If ^3 4) _ ?: »-. t, > ^4 1> 4) •■■> Oh rt IN ^ m' l> r; ■a rt nl J3 :j ^ Pi i/j O m -go's &H O - ~hj o O rt C 2 s 4^4* - ""-^ ^ •o-z: cj o Q W 8-d -;? o >:s2 o s: -n i^ -^ ^^ "^ 13 2 S °: a, o. I. S .J= 5. ho „ 4) i-r r 9 t; 4) 3 sl\ s Henry Courtenay Marquis of Exeter beheaded 1539- y o_-o w 1870 GENEALOGICAL TABLES P3 a a _c c XI r. U *-"* X -^ ■" 4> 01 3 p 5." o~ c ° ^"^ ^ c;s ^f § is^-;i ■-J ,«">.■< ■^ « >l ^'^^ a •£ ?Ns: c ^:^a ^% s"^ 0^ c J= «J -a" 3 - <^ 3 55 Sg< A, C o - 3 u rt E^ c •a 3-r ^E a o e o ^. CQ ^ . ,3 rt uO Ht3 *-• «^ °l-l •T3 £S« o * §£ E «j; ^ I rt^^ " rt 3 Wm o g 4, "j SI'S" C « 4) X C 'i^ > C i cu>?. -"^ DAUGHTERS OF HENRY VH 1871 1^ 2N OQ .•oft, ■^ 5C) a W U b ^ « S '^^l rt ? ^ h( S ^ t^ P « s ■a ^c^ WJ hC o "J3 o <; c O" aj rt O < 1872 GENEALOGICAL TAB1,ES en -- 5> ;'-J & >,co .0::: I ■ • "^ ^ >^^;: 00 . " i.. 5: -X' . R K -s w-s WE Q.g -35 Z W 't^ M ^ ->^ • t: E " * EJ3 •j;=ft'^?^ 5,; <0i^ U M 2" SOVEREIGNS OF ENGLAND 187: _ o' O O 3 C <^ 1$ s^ § «5 ;ci c •^ « „ C f-O C « aj fn fO_ O-^ L* M M o ■< • 1000 -._ Pi S c '^ rt ^ i-, 3 ^■C 3 en ^■^^ ts u ?: -J- .-^ WJ2 J=^ «o > « ji W a o 3*0 " ^3 £ 1 — rt n -arte "1 > « s 5; *>. - 5> g si W 3C.J -Oi >- * IS ^ - rK" 3 s^-St :'^^:^" Q OS ■^■^ PS < o <: ,'3 s •« •« ^- •< S ?* '•* ^ «c^ = O'S •-1 'g'o " ' — rt o u - -WO? — H > s PJTJ 'U M w? H>5 W " II COt! *« ^ N ?! l-J " w^ > " >.-a CiS -" ^:? w " .« ti ^vo"-^ 1^ .^"^ =<>> i874 GENEALOGICAL TABLES " :^ a -.S"^ — o"^.' CO C u o 3 - ■-■ -rS" fill ,— '-■0 vo -a ^ J "^ a'g J:- -OS u"^ i 5 ■ • iued. Henry the Seventh's dealings with, 590, 591 Northern, rise against Elizabeth, 773 Barrier, the Dutch, 1537 Bartholomew's Day, S. , massacre of, 826 the English, 1331 Basing House, siege of, 1 1 73, 1174 Bastille destroyed, 1747 Bates's case, 989 Bath, Henry de, 274 Bautzen, battle of, 1820 Baxter, Richard, 1331, 1339, 1367, 1458 Baylen, French surrender at, 1809 Beachy Head, battle of, 15 17 Beaufort, Henry, Bishop of Winchester, 530 Cardinal, 543 Beaufort, house of, its claims to the Crown, 54S Beaufort, Margaret, see Richmond Beaumont, palace of, 252 Bee, abbey of, 136 Beckford, Alderman, 1644 Bedford, Duke of, minister of George the Third, 1677, 1687 Bedford, John, Duke of, Regent of France, 534 — 536, 543. 544 Bedloe, 1407 Beket, Gilbert, 171, 172 site of his house, 196 Beket, Thomas, 196, 197 Chancellor, 199 Archbishop of Canterbury, 201 quarrel with Henry the Second, 202—205 death, 207 canonized, z7>. desecration of his shrine, 701 Belesme, Robert of, 182, 311 Bellahoe, battle of, 907 Bellasys, Lord, 1457 Benedict Biscop, 55, 71 " Benedict of Peterborough," 223 " Benevolences " under Edward the Fourth, 571 under Wolsey, 640, 641 under James the First, 996 Bensington, battle of, 76 Bentham, Jeremy, 181 7 Beorhtric, King of \Vessex, 78, 80 Beornwulf, King of Mercia, 82 Bemicia, kingdom of, 23 joined with Deira, ?/'. , 29 Bertha, wife of yJithelberhi of Kent, 31 Ben\ick, Duke of, 1551, 1565 Berwick stormed by Edward the P'irst, 363 taken by Bruce, 400, 409 regained l)y England, 412 its peculiar position, 413 pacification at, 1109 Beverley, Alfred of, 226 Bible, Wyclif's translation of, 468 its effects, 504 in Bohemia, 508 translation ])romised by Henry the Eighth, 659 Tyndalc's, 659, 695—697 Coverdale's, 673 the Geneva, 1058 effects of, on En and, 935—937 Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, defies Edward the First, 395 Bigod, Hugh, Earl, of Norfolk, 292, 294 Birinus, 44 Bishops, mode of appointing, 666, 667 James the First's theory of, 980 expelled from House of Lords, 11 19 restored, 1328 position under the Georges, 1608, 1609 the Seven, 1461 — 1463 Black Death, the, 478 — 479 Blake defends Taunton, 1213 blockades Rupert in the Tagus, //'. struggle with the Dutch, 1225, 1227, 1228 with Spain, 1261, 1267 his corpse outraged, 1327 Blenheim, battle of, 1553 — 1555 Bloreheath, battle of, 550 Blucher, Marshal, 1824, 1S26 Bohemia, effects of Wyclif's writings in, 508 struggle against Austria, 1005 — 1007 BolejTi, Anne, 646, 649, 664, 665, 689 Bolingbroke, Viscount (see St. John), 1569 rivalry with Harley, 1571 — 1573 joins the Pretender, 1580 returns, 1599 Bombay ceded to England, 1345, 1629 Boniface, S. (Winfrith), 78 Boniface VHL, Pope, 367, 394 Boniface of Savoy, Archbishop of Canterbury, 272, 273 Bonner, Bishop of London, 719, 723, 725, 935 Born, Bertrand de, 214 Borodino, battle of, 1819 Boroughbridge, battle of, 401 Boroughs, early English, 369 — 372 their representation in Parliament, 300, 335—342 restriction of franchise in, 527, 528 changes in representation, 808 new, created under the Tudors, 981 the Five, 92, 99 Boscawen, Admiral, 1652 Boston (Lincolnshire), its foundation, 60 Boston (Massachusetts) occupied by British troops, 1695 tea-riots, 1696 port closed, 1697 siege of, 1701 — 1702 BosworTh Field, battle of, 587 Bothwell, Earl of, 767 — 770 Botulf founds Boston, 60 Boulogne, Eustace, Count of, 131, 151 Boulogne, Najioleon's camp at, 1799 Bouvines, battle of, 237 Boyle, chemist, 1303 Boyne, battle of, 1 5 14 " Boys," the, 1599 Braddock, General, 1634 liradford, battle of, 62 Bradshaw, John, 1200, 1231, 1242, 1327 Brandywine, battle of, 1704 Breaule, Faukes de, 266, 26S Breda, Peace of, 1366 Bremen, dispute about, 1588 Vol. I. pp. I — 468; Vol II. ])]>. 469—931 ; Vol in. |)|). 933—1409; \'ol. I\'. ))p. 1411 1S50. iSSo INDEX Breslau, Peace of, 1621 Brctigny, treaty of, 444 Brigham, treaty of, 359 Brindlcy, engineer, 1729 Bristol, Earfof, 1366 Bristol, slave-trade at, in, 165, 9S5 siege of, 1 1 46 surrender, II4S West Indian Trade, 1595 Britain, Great, 1559 Britain under the Romans, 8, 9 attacked by Picts and Scots, 9, 10 English conquest of, 12 — 23 Britons, extermination of, 16, 17 defeat at Dregsastan, 34 end of their dominion, 82 Brooklyn, battle of, 1703 Browne, Archbishop of Dublin, 915, 916 Browne's Pastorals, 1094 Brownists, 962, 963, 1049, 11 77 Bruce, David, 412, 413, 431, 438 Bruce, Edward. 903 Bruce, Robert, the elder, 361, 367 Bruce, Robert, the younger, murders ComjTi, 404 crowned, ib. his successes. 406 — 409 truce with England, 409 acknowledged king, 41 1 dies, 412 Brunanburh, battle of, 103 Brunswick, Duke of, 1757 Brunswick, Ferdinand, Prince of, 1649, 1650, 1669 Buckingham, Duke of, beheaded, 639, 640 Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, looi, 1002 his policy, 1021, 1024 — 1025 impeached, 1027 — 1029 expedition to Rochelle, 1033 slain, 1039 Buckingham, second Duke of, 1291, 1301, 1377 negotiates with Holland, 1379 dismissed, 1395 imprisoned, 1399 Bulmer, Lady, burnt, 685 Bunkers Hill, battle of, 1701 Bunyan, John, 950 — 952, 1339 — 1341 his "Pilgrim's Progress,"' 1343— 1345 released, 1379 refuses Indulgence, 1458 Buonaparte, Joseph, King of Naples and Spain, 180S, 1 819 Buonaparte, Napoleon, 1767 successes in Italy, 1769 in Egypt, 1773 designs on Syria, 1774 First Consul, ib. victory at Niarengo, ib. Continental System, 1792 schemes of conquest, 1793, 1/97 France under him, 1797 war declared against, ib. threatens invasion of England, 1799; see Napoleon Burdett, Sir Francis, 1817 Burford, battle of, 69 Burgh, Hubert de, 246, 266, 270, 271 Hurgos, siege of, 18 19 Burgoyne, General, 1704 Burgundy, Charles the Bold, Duke of, 558 Burgundy, John, Duke of, 51 8, 525 Burgundy, Philip, Duke of, 525, 535, 542, 543 Burke, Edmund, 1683— 1686 supports American demands, 1699 his Hill of Economical Reform, 1722 moves impeachment of Hastings, 1741 hostility to the Revolution, 1750 -1755, 1757 quarrel with Fox, 1753 " Letters on Regicide Peace," 1769 death, 1771 Burleigh, Lord, 835 ; see Cecil Burnet, Bishop of Salisbury, 1310, 1509 Busaco, battle of, 181 2 Bute, Earl of, 1671, 1672, 1676 his policy in America, 1680 Butler, Bishop, 1310 Butler's " Hudibras," 1290 Byng, Admiral, 1635 " Cabal," the, 1414 Cabinet, its origin, 1412 — 1415 Cabot, Sebastian, 594, 1043 Cabul occupied, 1838 Cade, John, 546, 548 Cadiz, English descent on, S91 blockaded, 1621 Cadwallon, king of the Welsh, 39, 41 Ctedmon, 52 — 54 Caen, University founded by Bedford at, 543 Calais, siege of, by Edward the Third, 438 — 440 ceded to him, 444 lost, 731 Calcutta, its origin, 1629 Black Hole of, 1648 Calne, council of, 113 Cambray, league of, 611 treaty of, 649 Cambridge, George, Duke of, 1573 ; see George the Second Cambridge, the New Learning at, 608 Erasmus at, ib., 616 Protestants at, 697 Camden, 800 Campbell, Sir Colin, 1845 Campeggio, Cardinal, 648, 649 Camperdown, battle of, 1771 Campian, Jesuit, 819 — 821 Campo P'ormio, Treaty of, 1769 Canada, conquest of, 1651 — 1655 ceded by France, 1672 Constitution granted to, 1753 American invasions of, 1821 revolt in, 1837 Canals, 1729 Canning, George, Foreign Secretary, 1806 his policy, ib., 1807, 1 809 retires, 1811 supports Catholic emancipation, 1817 returns to office, 1832 death, ib. Vol. I. pp. I — 468 ; Vol. II. p]i. 469 — 931 ; Vol. HI. pp. 933 — 1409; Vol. IV. pp. 141 1 — 1850. INDEX Canons of 1604, 986 Ceorls, 6 of 1636, 1091 Cerdic, first King of West Saxons, 19, 20 Canterbury, royal city of Kent, 31 Ceylon won by England, 1769 Augustine at, ^^ Chad, see Ceadda becomes the ecclesiastical centre of England, Chalgrove Field, battle of, 1148 58,59 Chalus, siege of, 218 Theodore's school at, 71 Chambers, Alderman, 1 073 sacked by Danes, 117 Chancellor, Richard, 789 historians of, 222 Chancellor, the, his office, 183, 325, 326 Cape of Good Hope won by England, 1769 Chancery, Court of, 325, 326 Cardigan, conquest of, 312 Chantries suppressed, 708 Carlisle conquered by Ecgfrith, 62 Charford, battle of, 19 Cuthbert at, 63, 65 Charles (the First), Prince, negotiations for his Mary Stuart at, 771 marriage, 1002, 1012 Carolinas, their settlement, 1661 goes to Madrid, 1017 Caroline of Anspach, wife of George the Second, his character, 1019 1596, 1599 marriage, 1023 Carteret, Lord, 1621, 1623 King, id. Carthusians, victims of T. Cromwell, 679 policy, z'd. Cartwright, Thomas, 953 — 955, 964 — 966 protects Buckingham, 1027, 1029, 1030, 1038 Carucage, 242 levies forced loan, 1030 Cassel, battle of, 1400 consents to Petition of Right, 1037 Castlebar, battle of, 1 785 his personal government, 1067 — 1075 Castlemaine, Countess of, 1380 ; see Cleveland dealings with Scotland, 1090, iioi, 1103, Castlereagh, Lord, 1791, 181 1, 1818, 1832 1 105 — 1 1 10, 1 124 Catesby, Robert, 986 tries to arrest five members, 1 133 — 1135 Catharine of Aragon, wife of Henry the E ighth. attempt on Hull, 1 139 611, 646, 647, 648, 664 raises standard at Nottingham, 1141 Catharine of Braganza, wife of Charles the S( jcond, campaign of 1642, 1142 — 1144 1364 besieges Gloucester, 1149 Catharine of France, wife of Henry the Fifth, 525 negotiates with Confederate Catholics, 11 50 Catharine the Second, Empress of Russia, 1748, movements in 1644, 11 57 — 1160 1756 negotiates at Uxbridge, 1 1 70 Catholics, Roman, their position under Eliza- defeated at Xaseby, 1 1 71 — 1 1 73 beth, 761, 762, 774, 820 treaty with the Irish, 11 75 revolt, 773, 774 goes to Scotch camp, 1185 revival, 817 — 819, 969 sold to Parliament, 1 187 laws against them relaxed, 983 seized by army, 1 1 92 priests banished, 1336 flies, 1 1 94 prospects under Charles the Second, ij 63 prisoner, 1195 excluded from Indulgence, 1377 seized again, 1200 their hopes, 1403, 1404 trial, 1200, 1202 excluded from Parliament, 1407 death, 1202 admitted to office, &c., by James the Second, Charles the Second proclaimed King in Scotland, 1453 1205 Confederate, 11 26, 11 50 negotiates with the Scots, 121 3 condition in Ireland, 1775 crowned at Scone, 1 2 1 7 struggles for emancipation, 1781 — -1783, defeated at Worcester, 1 218, 1219 1790— 1791, 1806, 1832— 1833 restored, 1277, 1278 Cato Street conspiracy, 1831 character, 1 35 1— 1356 "Cavaliers," 11 32 policy, 1356— 1358 Cavendish, Lord, 1381, 141 1, 1423; i^'^ Devon- army, 136 1 shire plans of Catholic toleration, 1361^1363 Cawnpore, massacre of, 1845 conversion, 1373 Caxton, William, 575—584 negotiates with Lewis, 1373 — 1375 Ceadda, Bishop of Mercia, 48, 49 relations with Parliament, 1381, 1394 — 1397, Ceadwalla, King of Wessex, 67 1399, 1400 Ceawlin, King of Wessex, 20 relations with Lewis, 1398, 1403, 1409 Cecil, Robert, see Salisbury plan for James's succession, 1416 Cecil, William, 756, 772, 774 ; see Burleigh change in his temper, 1421 Centwine, King of Wessex, 66 treaty with France, 1427 Cenwealh, King of Wessex, 62 triuni])h over Country parly, 1427, 1428, Cenwulf, King of Mercia, 82 1431— 1433 Ceolfrid, founder of Jarrow, 71 rule, 1435—1438 Ceolred, King of Mercia, 67, 69 death, 1441 Vol. I. pp. 1—468; Vol. II. |)ii. 469 — 931 : \'ol. IH. ]ip. 933—1409; Vol. I\'. pp. 1411- 1850. i88: INDEX Charles the Great, 79, 80 Charles the Simple grants Normandy to Ilrolf, 135 Charles the Fifth, King of Spain, Emperor, &c., 631, 638 alliance with Henry the Eighth, 638 breaks his pledges, 645 treaty with France, 649 Charles the Sixth, Emperor, 1593, 1603 Charles the Seventh, Emperor, 1621 Charles the Fifth, King of France, 447, 448 Charles the Sixth of P" ranee, 506, 518, 525, 534 Charles the Seventh of France, 534, 538, 541, 545 Charles the Eighth of France, 611 Charles the Tenth, King of France, 1835 Charles the Second, King of Spain, 1531, 1535 Charles the Third, King of Spain, 1557, 1562 Charles the Fourth, King of Spain, 1808 Charles the Twelfth, King of Sweden, 158S Charlestown, capture of, 1707 Charmouth, battle of, 86 Charter of Henry the First, 168, 169 produced by Langton, 238 the Great, 240 — 243 re-issued, 245 confirmed by Henry the Third, 268, 276 confirmed by Edward the First, 395 the People's, 1837 of towns, cancelled by Charles the Second, 1437 Chateau-Gaillard, 215, 216, 219, 220 Chatham, Earl of (see Pitt), 1687, 1691, 1695, 1697, 1699, 1704 — 1707 Chaucer, 417 — 428 Caxton's edition of, 576 Cherbourg surrendered to Charles the Seventh, 545 Chester conquered by -P^thelfrith, 35 Danes at, 98 conquered by William, 153 blockaded, 1171 Chesterfield, Earl of, 1599, 1624 Chichester, Sir Arthur, 927 Chillingworth, William, theologian, 1307 — 13 10 China, war with, 1838 treaty, 1840 Chippewa, battle of, 1822 Chivalry, 347 — 350 Chotusitz, battle of, 1621 Christ Church, Oxford, 637 "Christian Brethren," the, 697 Chronicle, English, 97 its end, 229 Church, English, its foundation, 31 — 2iZ in Northumbria, 41 — 52, 54 — 56 organized by Theodore, 57 — 59 condition under William the First, 158 — 161 under Rufus, 166 — 168 under Henry the First, 178 — 182 action during the anarchy, 195, 196 Henry the Second and, 201 — 204, 208 John and, 232 — 234 condition under John and Henry the Third, 279 — 282 under Edward the First, 326 in fourteenth century, 453 — 456 plans of reform in, 458 — 461 Church, English — continued. political decline in fifteenth century, 530 condition after Wars of the Roses, 565 — 568 its reform undertaken by Parliament, 659 Henry the Eighth Head of, 662—666 its independent jurisdiction abolished, 664 T. Cromwell's dealings with, 666, 673 spoliation of, 694, 695 changes under Edward the Sixth, 711 — 715 submission to Rome, 722 Elizabeth and, 746 — 751 proposals in Parliament for its reform, 812 condition under Elizabeth, 814 — 816 parties in, 971—973 demand for its reform, 973 the Long Parliament and, 1129 — 1132 Cromwell's dealings with, 1254 condition under Charles the Second, 1328— .^^^^^ . bill for its security, 1400 James the Second"s dealings with, 1455 — 1463 temper after the Revolution, 1507 — 1509 condition under the Georges, 1608 — 1609 influence of Methodists on, 1618 Irish, its mission work, 41 — 43 condition under Henry the Eighth, 912 — 916 Protestant, disestablished, 1847, 1848 Scottish Presbyterian, 1085 — 1091, 1507 Church-rates abolished, 1848 Churchill, John, 1448, 1540, 1541. See Marl- borough Cintra, Convention of, 1809 Circuit, the Bloody, 1446 — 1447 Cistercians, 180 Ciudad Rodrigo stormed, 1818 Clair-sur-Epte, treaty of, 135 Clare, Earl of, settles in Pembroke, 312 Clarence, George, Duke of, 558, 559 Clarendon, Assize of, 210, 211 Constitutions of, 202 — 204, 208 Clarendon, Edward Hyde, Earl of [see Hyde), Lord Chancellor, 1319 his policy, 1328 fall, 1366, 1367 Clarendon, Henry Hyde, Earl of, 1456, 1457 Claverhouse, 1494 Clement the Seventh, Pope, 647 — 649, 664 Clergy, representation of, in Parliament, 342 — 344 condition in fourteenth century, 454 — 456 submission to Henry the Eighth, 662 their enslavement, 671 position under Elizabeth, 748 — 751, 814, 815, 958—962 Puritan, expelled, 986 Laud's dealings with, 1057 — 1060 condition under the Georges, 1608, 1609 effect of Methodist revival on, 161 8 Cleveland, Barbara Palmer, Duchess oi{sce Castle- maine), 1354 Cleves, Anne of, 689, 705 Clifford, Lord, 553 Clifford, Sir Thomas, 1372, 1375, 1377, 1379, 1381 Clive, Robert, 1629 — 1 631, 1647 — 1648, 1707 — 1709 Closter-Seven, Convention of, 1637 Vol. L pp. I — 468 ; Vol. H. pp. 469 — 931 ; Vol. HL pp. 933—1409 ; Vol. IV. pp. 141 1 — 1850. INDEX i88^ Cloth of Gold, Field of, 638 Constantine, King of Scots, 103 Cnichtenagild, in London, 181, 376 Constitutional Clubs, 1755 Cnut, King of Denmark and England, 122 — 127 Continental system. Napoleon's, 1792, 1S03 Cnut the Fourth, King of Denmark, 165 Contract, the Great, 990 Coal, discovery of its uses, 1729 — 1731 Convention of 1660, 1277 Coalition Ministry, 1556, 1722 — 1725 declares itself a Parliament, 1320 Cobham, Eleanor, 534 of 1688, 1487 Cobham, Lord (Sir John Oldcastle), 502, 516, 517 Constituent, 1234, 1235, 1239, 1240 Codrington, Admiral, 1832 Scottish, 1494 Coke, Sir Edward, 997, 998, 1037 Convocation, Colet's address to, 610 Colchester, siege of, 1197 — 1199 submits to Llenry the Eighth, 664 Coleman, secretary of Mary of Modena, 1404, upholds Divine Right of Kings, 976 1405, 1409 its canons of 1604, 986 Colet, John, 596—599 suspended, 1608 dean of St. Paul's, 605 Cook, Captain, 1660 founds St. Paul's School, ib., 606 Cooper, Sir Ashley, 1271, 1273, 1276 his address to Convocation, 610 Chancellor of the Exchequer, 1320 charged with heresy, ib. See Ashley, Shaftesbury denounces war, 613 Coote, Eyre, 1707, 1711, 17 12 Colman, Bishop of Lindisfarne, 55, 56 Cope, Sir John, 1624 Columba, S., 43 Copenhagen, battle of, 1793 Commerce, Bolingbroke's proposed treaty of, 1571 bombardment of, 1806 Pitt's treaty with France, 1741 Copy-holders, 472 Commission, Ecclesiastical, under Elizabeth, 958, Corn Laws, 1831, 1841 — 1843 960 Cornwall conquered Ijy Ecgberht, 82 abolished, 11 24 revolts, 86 restored, 1456 royalist rising in, 1146 Commons of Kent, their Complaint, 546 — 54S Cornwall, Richard, Earl of, '290, 298 Commons summoned to Parliament, 300 Cornwallis, Lord, 1707, 171 2 House of, 445, 446 Coroners, 332 its struggle with Wolsey, 640, 641 Corresponding Society, 1765 Petition to Henry the Eighth, 657—659 Corunna, battle of, 1810 advance under Elizabeth, 80S — 813 Council, the Continual, 294, 389 under James the First, 1012 — 1015 Great, 212, 242, 329—331 struggle with Charles the First, 1029, 1030, of Officers, 1208 1033— 1037, 1041, 1042, 1 1 17— 1 124 Royal, its criminal jurisdiction, 591 place in the constitution, 11 13 reorganized by Temple, 1414, 1415 proceedings in 1641-42, 1129 — 1136 Privy, 212 temper after the Revolution, 1509 of State, 1206 becomes supreme in the State, 1522 Country party, 1381, 1391, 1393, 1398, 1399 its relation to the Crown and the IMinistry, County Court, the, 332, 333 1523— 1525 Courcy, John de, 899 Whig ascendency in, 1580 — 1582 Courtenay, Bishop of London, 460 character under George the Third, 1673 — 1676 Archbishop of Canterbury, 464, 504 struggle with Wilkes, 1678, 1689 — 1690 Courtenay, see Exeter with the Press, 1690 Covenant, the Scottish, 1105, 1106 adopts Catholic emancipation, 1S17, 1835 ; signed in London, 115 1 see Parliament burnt there, 1328 Commonwealth established, 1206 abolished in Scotland, 1359 proclaimed, 1208 Coventry, Sir William, 1381 "Communes," 296, 383 — 385 Coverdale, Miles, 673 Compact, the Family, 1601 Cowell, his theory of absolutism, 976 Compiegne, its defence by Jeanne dWrc, 542 Cowper, William, Lord Keeper, 1556 Comprehension Bill, 1507 Craft-gilds, 380-381, 383-385 Compton, Bishop of London, 1456, 1479, 14S1 Craggs, Secretary of Stale, 1592 Compurgation abolished, 211 Cranfield, Treasurer, 1017 ; sec Middlesex Comyn, regent of Scotland, 367 Cranmer, Thomas, his advice on llenry the Comyn, the Red, slain, 404 Eighth's divorce, 659 Congregation, Lords of the, 756 Archbisho]) of Cantcrlniry, 664 Congregationalists, their rise, 1 1 78 divorces llenry and Catharine, //'., 665 Connecticut, origin of the settlement, I lOl crowns Anne Holeyii, 665 f'onservatives, 1839 liis Protestantism, 71 I Conservators of the Peace, 327 iiii])ris()ne(l, 719 Constable, Sir Robert, 685 his hfe and death, 728, 729 Constance (jf Jiriltany, 226 Creey, l)attle of, 436, 437 Vol. I. \i\\ I -468; Vol. II. pp. 469 93r ; \'..l. III. |ip. ^)},}, 1409; \ 111. I\'. p|i. i.jii 1850. iSS4 INDEX Crew, Chief Justice, 1030 Crimean war, 1S44 Crompton invents the '•mule," 1732 Cromwell, Henry, 1253 Cromwell, Oliver, his youth, 948, 949, 1 161 at Marston Moor, 1157 quarrel with Manchester, 1 160 his regiment, 1161 — 1166 scheme of New Model, 116S, 1 169 victory at Naseby, 1171 — 1173 advocates toleration, 11 82 — 11 85 defeats Scots, 1198 conquest of Ireland, 1209 — 121 3 victory at Dunbar, 1 213— 1 215 at Worcester, 12 18, 12 19 drives out the Rump, 1229— 123 1 his polic}-, 1235 — 1238 named Protector, 1241 his rule, 1243 — 1254 foreign policy, 1254 — 1261 settlement of Ireland, 1251 — 1253 refuses title of king, 1263 inaugurated as Protector, 1265 death, 1271 his corpse outraged, 1327 Cromwell, Richard, 1271 Cromwell, Thomas, 654 fidelity to Wolsey, ib., 656 counsel on the divorce, 657 policy, 661 Vicar-General, 666 dealings with the Church, 666 — 673, 700 — 705 his rule, 675 — 677 dealings with the nobles, 682 — 687 administrative activity, 687 fall, 689, 690 success of his jjolicy, 691, 692 his revival of Parliaments, 692 Crow land Abbey, 60 burnt by Danes, 87 Cuba, English conquest of, 1672 CuUoden Moor, battle of, 1626 Cumberland, Ernest, Duke of. King of Hanover, 1838 Cumberland granted to Constantine of Scotland, 103 Cumberland, William, Duke of, 1624, 1626, 1635 Cumbria, kingdom of, 34, 351 southern, conquered by Ecgfrith, 62 Cuthbert, S., 49—52, 63, 65 Cuthwulf, King of the West Saxons, 20 Cynric, 19, 20 Dacre, Lord, 682, 685 Dacres, Leonard, 773 Dsegsastan, battle of, 34 Danby, Thomas Osborne, Earl of, Lord Trea- surer, 1397 _ his policy, 1397— 1403 fall, 1409 correspondence with William, 1479, 1481 prepares for a rising, 1485, i486 Lord President, 1509 Danegeld, 184 Danelaw, the, 89 conquest of, 99 — loi revolts, 103, 106 submits to Swein, 1 1 7 Danes attack Britain, 87 conquer East Anglia, ib. attack Wessex, 88 struggle with /Elfred, ib., 89, 93, 98, 99 treaties with him, 89, 93 routed by Eadward and /Ethelred, 98 defeated at Brunanburh, 103 massacre of, 1 1 6 conquer England, 117, 122 their settlements in Ireland, 894 Daniel, poet and historian, 801 Darcy, Lord, 685 Darnley, Henry Stuart, Lord, 716, 764 — 768 David Bruce ; see Bruce David, King of Scots, 357, 358 David, Prince of Wales, 320 Davies, Sir John, 1094 Deane, (jeneral, 1249 "Defenders," Irish, 1784 Deira, kingdom of, 23, 29 Deorham, battle of, 20 Derby, Edward Stanley, Earl of, 1844, 1846, 1847 Derby, Ferrars, Earl of, 209 Derby, Henry of Lancaster, Earl of, 506 — 510 ; see Henry the Fourth Dermod, King of Leinster, 897, 898 Desmond, Earls of, 903, 923 Despensers, the, 400 — 402 Dettingen, battle of, 1622 Devonshire, Earl of {see Cavendish) 1481, 1485, i486 Digby, Lord, 11 17 Digges, Sir Dudley, 1 029, 1030 Directory, the trench, 1767 Disraeli, Benjamin, 1847, 1850 Dissidence, its growth, 1182 Domesday Book, 158 Dominic, S., 282 Dominicans, see Friars Donne, 1094 Dorchester, first West-Saxon see, 44 Dorset, Sackville, Earl of, 860 Douglas, James, 407 Dover besieged by Lewis of France, 246 treaty of, 1375 Dowdall, Archbishop of Armagh, 916 Drake, Francis, 829 — 832, 835, 837, 841, 843, 889 Drama, see Literature Dreux, battle of, 761 Drogheda, storm of, 1209 — 121 1 Dryden, 1301, 1370, 1383 Dublin besieged by Ormond, 1209 Dudley, Guildford, 717, 720 Dudley, minister of Henry the Seventh, 605 Dumbarton taken by Eadberht, 74 Dunbar, battle of, 1213 — 1215 Duncan, Admiral, 1771 Dundas, Henry, 1799 Dundee, John Graham of Claverhouse, Viscount, 1494— 1496 Vol. I. pp. I — 468; Vol. II. pp. 469 — 931 ; Vol. HI. pp. 933—1409; Vol. IV. pp. 1411 — 1850. INDEX 1885 Dunedin, 352 Dunes, battle of the, 1269 Dunkirk ceded to England, 1269 sold to France, 1366 Duns Scotus, 287 Dunstan, S., 103 — 106 his administration, 106 — loS, 113 death, 114 Dupleix, his designs in India, 1629 — 1631 Duquesne, Fort, 1633, 1652 Durham, historians of, 222 DyTOaint, 78 Eadberht, King of Xorthumbria, 74, 75 Eadgar, King of England, 107, 108, 113 his Law, iio, 123 Eadgar, King of Scots, 168 Eadgar, the /Etheling, 149, 150, 152, 168 Eadmer, 222 Eadmund, King of Wessex, 103, 104, 106 grants Strathclyde to Malcolm, 355 Eadmund Ironside, 122 Eadmund, S., of East Anglia, 87 Eadred, King of Wessex, 106 Eadric of Mercia, 122 Eadward the Confessor, 129 — 133 his promise to William, 144 his Laws, 129 Eadward the Elder, King of Wessex, 99 — loi Eadward the Martyr, 113 Eadwig, brother of Eadmund Ironside, 122 Eadwig, King of Wessex, 106, 107 Eadwine, Earl of Mercia, 133, 149, 150, 152, Eadwine, King of Northumbria, 35 — 39 Ealdhelm, Bishop of Sherborne, 67 Ealdormen, 26 Ealdred, Archbishop of York, 150 Ealhstan, Bishop of Sherborne, 87 Earldoms created by Cnut, 123 Ebbsfleet, 12, 13, ^^ Ecgberht, Archbishop of York, 74 Ecgberht of Wosex, 78, 79, 82, 83, 86 Ecgfrith, King of Northumbria, 62 — 65, 352, 353 Ecgwine, Bishop of Worcester, 60 Edgehili, battle of, 1142, 1143 Edinburgh, its origin, 38, 352 capital of Scot Kings, 355, 357 English troops at, 505 Edmbitvi^h Review, 1816 Edington, battle of, 89 Edith, see Matilda Edmund Rich, 256, 257 reads Aristotle at Oxford, 261 Archbishop of Canterbury, 275 exile, 276 Edmund, son of Henry the Third, 292 Education, national, its beginnings, 1836 Committee of, ih. School Boards, 1849 ; see Literature, Schools Edward the First, his motto, 291 defeated by Llewelyn, 292 faithful to the Provisions of Oxfijrd, 294 surrenders at Lewes, 298 Edward the First — continued. escapes, 302 takes Gloucester, ih. victory at Evesham, 302 — 304 character, 318, 319, 345—351 crusade, 319 conquers Wales, 320 — 322 his policy, 322 judicial reforms, 324 — 326 legislation, 326 — 328 social changes under, 329, 331, 335, 386, 387 first conquest of Scotland, 359 — 364 second, 364 — 36S struggle with barons, 389—391, 394, 395 expels Jews, 393 dealings with clergy, 394 war with P" ranee, ib. confirms Charters, 395 death, 395, 406 Edward the Second, King, 395 struggle with Lords Ordainers, 398 — 400 defeated at Bannockburn, 408 truce with Scotland, 409 deposed and murdered, 402, 403 Edward the Third proclaimed King, 403 arrests Mortimer, 411 struggle with Scotland, 412, 413 quarrel with France, 430, 431 alliance with Flanders, 431, 433, 434 with German princes, 432 war with France, 434 — 444 loses Aquitaine, 448 death, 485 Edward the Fourth, sec March victor at Towton, 554 King, ib. marriage, 557, 558 struggle with Warwick, flight and return, 558, 559 final success, 560 character, 569 policy, 569—571 ]:)atron of Caxton, 571, 582 death, 584 Edward the Fifth, 5S4 More's Life of, 622 Edward the Sixth, King, 709 proposal for his marriage, 755 his Grammar Schools, 715 his " plan " for the succession, 716 death, 717 Edward the Black Prince at Crecy, 436, 437 plunders Clascony, 441 victory at Poitiers, 442, 443 expedition to Spain, 447 sacks Limoges, 448 death, 451 Egypt conquered by Buonaparte, 1773 French withdraw from, 1793 " Eikon iiasilike,"' 1207 Eldon, Lord Chancclli)r, 1832 Eleanor of Poitou, wife of Henry the Second, 196, 199, 218, 220 Eleanor of Provence, wife of FKnry the Tliird, 272, 296, 300, 301 Vol. I. pp. 1—468; Vol. H. pj). 469 -931 ; \'ol. IH. pp. 933—1409; Veil. I\'. pp. 141 1 i,S5o. 1 886 INDEX Eleanor, sister of Henry the Third, marries Simon de Mont fort, 290 Eliot, Sir John, 1025 — 1027 attacks Buckingham, 1029 arrested, 1030 moves Remonstrance, 1037 speeches in Parliament, 1039, 1041 death, 1068 Eliott, (Jeneral, 1707, 1 71 7 Elizabeth, daughter of Edward the Fourth, 585 ^ „ marries Henry the Seventh, 587 Elizabeth, daughter of Henry the Eighth, 709 her Greek-scholarship, 616 accession, 731 character, 733 — 746 Church policy, 746—751- 953 dealings with Scotland, 755, 756 with Huguenots, 761 with Roman Catholics, 757, 761, 762, 774, 818-822, 833 troubles with Mary Stuart and the Parlia- ment, 766 with Mary and Alva, 770, 771 Catholic revolt and Bull of Deposition against her, 772 — 774 relations with Parliament, 808 — 813, 981 — 983 plans for her marriage, 828 policy in Ireland, 919 — 925 death, 931 Elizabeth, daughter of James the First, 1002 Elizabeth, Empress of Russia, 1634, 1672 Ellandun, battle of, 82 Ely, foundation of, 60 burnt by Danes, 87 surrendered to William, 153, 154 Emma, wife of .Ethelred the Second, 116, 144 Empson, minister of Henry the Seventh, 605 l-"nclosures, riots against, 568 England, the making of, 12 — 83 intercourse with the Franks, 78 — 80 Danish conquest of, 114— 117, 122 condition under Cnut, 122 — 127 relations with Normandy, 144 conquered by William, 149 — 154 immigration from the Continent into, 170, 171 condition under Stephen, 195 under Interdict, 233 agrarian discontent in, 480, 482—484, 568, 641 — 644 Commines' account of, 561, 562 New Learning in, 593 — 620 effects of Wolsey's administration in, 633 — 638 change in attitude towards Rome, 663 — 664 industrial progress under Edward the First, 386, 387 social condition in the sixth century, 24 — 28 in tenth and eleventh centuries, in, 112 under the Edwards, 328, 331, 386, 387, 415—417, 428—430, 456 in fourteenth century, 470 — 484, 497 — 502 England — continued. in fifteenth century, 527 — 534 during Wars of the Roses, 561 — 563 after, 563—569 under F.li/.alieth, 778—796 in Puritan time, 937 — 944, 948 modern, its beginning, 1286 joins Triple Alliance, 1370 position in Grand Alliance, 1492 new ])osition under House of Hanover, 1577 1578 growth of trade and wealth, 1595 society in, under the Georges, 1609 — 1611 lihilanthro])ic revival in, 1618, 1619 alliance with Prussia, 1634 its place in the world, 1659, 17 18, 17 19 relations with America, 1664, 1665, 1680 — 1682, 1694 — 1699, 1705, 1717, 1814, 1821, 1822 industrial ])rogress in eighteenth century, 1727— 1732 condition compared with the Continent, 1743 attitude towards French revolution, 1750, 1751 efforts of revolutionists in, 1755 panic in, 1763 — 1765 colonial gains, 1769 successes at sea, 1771 — 1773 northern league against, 1792 declares war with Buonaparte, 1797 condition during French war, 1815, 1816 after, 1829 — 1831 severed from Hanover, 1 838 England, New, 1043 — 1053, 1065 return of Independents from, 1 178 its four States, 1661 its schools, 1663 England, Old, i, 2 Engle, their Sleswick home, i, 2 settle in East Anglia, 19 conquer Mid-Britain and the North, 22, 23 English, Middle, 22 English people, their life in the older England, their religion, 7> 8 conquer Britain, 10 — 23 their settlement, 24 — 26 significance of their history, 1719 ; see Eng- land Eorls, 6 Episcopacy abolished in Scotland, 10S9 restored, ib. demand for its abolition in England, 11 32 Erasmus, 599 — 601, 604 his edition of S. Jerome, 602, 6x6 " Praise of Folly," 605, 622 denounces the war, 613, 614 his Greek Testament, 618 his theology, 618—620 Essex, Countess of, 999, looi Essex, Earl of, Elizabeth's favourite, 873, 925, 929 Essex, Earl of, commander of Parliamentary army, 1141 — 1143, 1146, 114S relieves Gloucester, 1149 Vol. I. pp. 1—468; Vol. II. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. III. pp. 933—1409 ; '^'ol- I^'- PP- 1411—1850- INDEX 1887 Essex, Earl of — continued. Fitz-Thomas, Thomas, mayor of London, 383 defeated in Cornwall, 1157 Fitz-Urse, Reginald, 206, 207 resigns his command, 1168 Fitz-Walter, Robert, 239, 246 Essex, Earl of, minister of Charles the Second, Fitz-Warenne, Fulk, 276, 277 1412, 1418, 1423, 1431, 1432 Five Boroughs, 92, 99 Essex, Henry of, 313 Flamsteed, astronomer, 1303 Euphuism, 801, 802 Flanders, its relations with England, 431, 433, Eustace the Monk, 246 434, 787 Evesham, its origin, 60 English Gild of Merchant Adventurers in , 575 battle of, 302 — 304 occupied by the French, 1369 Exchange, the Royal, 786 delivered by Marlborough, 1558 Exchequer, Court of, 184, 212 Flemings in Pembroke, 312, 314 Richard Eitz-Xeal's treatise on, 224 under Edward the Third, 433 closed, 1377 Fletcher, Phineas and Giles, 1094 Excise Bill, WalpoIe"s, 1594, 1597 Fleurus, battles of, 1 5 16, 1767 Pitt's, 1737 Flodden, battle of, 755 Exclusion Bill, 1415, 1416, 1424, 1425 Flood, Irish leader, 1714 Exeter, Courtenay, Marquis of, 687 Florida ceded to England, 1672 Exeter, Danes in, 89 restored to Spain, 171 7 revolts against the Conqueror, 152 Fontenoy, battle of, 1624 Eylau, battle of, 1806 Fortescue, Sir John, his definition of Er kingship, 562 Fort William (Calcutta), its origin, 1629 glish Faddiley, battle of, 29 Fourmigny, battle of, 545 Fairfax, Lord. 1145 Fox, Bishop of Winchester, 609, 620, 633 Fairfax, Sir Thomas, I153, 1155, 116S, I169, Fox, Charles, 1721, 1722 I197, II99, 1200, 1276 his India Bill, 1725 Falkirk, battles of, 366, 3&7, 1626 supports Regency of Prince of Wales, 1 748 Falkland, Viscount, 1127 attitude towards Revolution, 1747, 1753 his demands of Church reform, 1 130 his Libel Act, 1753 leaves Parliament and joins Charles, 1 139 Burke's quarrel with, ib. death, 1149 forsaken by the Whigs, 1763 his philosophy, 1293, 1306 returns to office, 1803 Farmers, their rise, 473 death, ih. Fastolfe, Sir John, 539, 582 Foxe, John, his " Book of Martyrs," 816 Fawkes, Guido, 987 France, William the First and, 165 Felton, John, 1038, 1039 Edward the Third and, 430 — /\/\^ Ferdinand the Catholic, King of Arag on, 611, alliance with the Scots, 505 612 truce with Richard the Second, 506 Ferdinand the Seventh, King of Spain, i 808 Henry the Fifth and, 51S — 525 Ferozeshah, battle of, 1841 struggle against Bedford, 534 — 543 Ferrar, Bishop of St. David's, 727 English expelled from, 545 Feudalism, its growth under the Conqueror, 154 relations with Italy, 61 1 -158 with Henry the Eighth, Spain, and the its ruin, 438 Empire, ib., 612, 613, 633, 638, 640, 645. Fifth-Monarchy men, 1361 649 Finch, Chief Justice, 1105 civil wars in, 757, 761, 762, 770, 826,889- -891 Lord Keeper, 11 19 relations with England and Holland, i " 63- First of June, battle of, 1767 — 1769 1366 Fisher, Bishop of Rochester, supports the New Family Compact with Spain, 1601 Learning, 608 alliance with Prussia, 1623 patron of Erasmus, 620 designs in India and America, 1628 — 16 ll his reply to Luther, 633 withdraws thence, 1672 opposes Henry the Eighth's divorce, 647 alliance with United States, 1 705, 1746, 1747 imprisoned, 678 Pitt's treaty of commerce with, 1739 death, 681 condition in eighteenth century, 1745, i; 46 Fitzgerald, Lord Thomas, 906 revolution in, 1747, 1749. 175'!, 1756— 1 759 Fitzgerald, Maurice, 897 declares war on the Enqieror, 1756 Fitz-Hamo, Robert, 312 on Holland, 1759 ?'itzharris, his impeachment, 1427 on England, 1761 Fitz-Neal, Richard, his dialogue on the Ex- insurrections in, 1765, 1766 chefjuer, 224 struggle against Europe, 17C6, 1767 Fitz-Osbern, William, 150, 152 conciuers Holland, 1767 Fitz-Peter, (ieoffrey, Justiciar, 238 Directory in, //'. Fitz-Stephen, Robert, 897 conquests in Italy, 1709—1771 Vol. I. ])]). 1—468-, \'ol. II. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. HI. i)p. 933—1409; Vol. IV. pp. 1411 — 1850. i888 INDEX France — continued. Consulate, 1774 Buonaparte's rule in, 1797 revolution of 1830, 1835 Franchise, Parliamentary, restricted under Henry the Sixth, 527—529 the forty shilling, 529 extension in 1S32, 1835 in 1867, 1846 Francis, S., of Assisi, 282 Francis the First, King of France, conquers Lomhardy, 633 meeting with Henry the Eighth, 638 prisoner, 644 released, 646 Francis the Second, King of France, 755 — 757 Franciscans, sec Friars Franklin, Benjamin, 16S1 Frank-pledge, 373 Franks, their intercourse with England, 78 — So Frederick, Elector Palatine, 1002, 1005, 1007, 1019 Frederick, Prince of Wales, 1603 Frederick the Second, King of Prussia, 1603, 1605 victory at Chotusitz, 1 621 alliance with France, 1623 seizes Prague, ib. drives Austrians from Silesia, 1624 treaty with England, 1634 seizes Dresden, 1635 victory at Prague and defeat at Kolin, ib. victories at Rossbach, Leuthen, and Zom- dorf, 1649 defeats in 1759, ib., 1650 successes in 1760, 1669 share in partition of Poland, 1748 death, ib. Friars, the, 282—288 Frideswide, S., Priory of, at Oxford, 250, 252 Friedland, battle of, 1806 Frith-Gilds, 372 — 374 Frobisher, Martin, 839, 1044 Fuentes d'Onore, battle of, 1813 Fulk of Jerusalem, Count of Anjou, 190 Fulk the Black, Count of Anjou, 1S8, 190 Fulk the Good, Count of Anjou, 186 Fulk the Red, Count of Anjou, 186 Gage, General, 1697 Gaimar, 226 Galen, Linacre's translation of, 596 Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester, 6S9, 709 719, 722 Garnet, Jesuit, 987 Gauden, Dr., 1207 Gaunt, Elizabeth, 1447 Gaunt, John of, Duke of Lancaster, invades France, 448 struggle with Parliament, 449 — 451 supports Wyclif, 458, 460 turns against him, 463, 466 expedition to Spain, 505, 506 driven from power, ib. Gavel-kind, 476 Gaveston, Piers, 397 — 399 Geoffry Grey-gown, Count of Anjou, 18S Geoffry Martel, Count of Anjou, 141. 142, 190 Geoffry Plantagenet, Count of Anjou, 191, 192, 196 Geoffry, son of Henry the Second. 209, 212, 226 George the First, King, 1576, 1579, 1588 George the Second, King [see Cambridge), 1579. 1596, 1622, 1665 George the Third, King, 1665 — 1667 his " friends," 1668 supports Whigs against Pitt, //'. , 167 1 his home policy, 1672, 1673 dealings with the Commons, 1675, 1676 with the Whigs, 1676 with Pitt, 1677 his personal administration, 1696 dealings with America, 1694 — 1697 madness, 1748, 1817 refuses Catholic emancipation, 1791 death, 183 1 George (the Fourth), Prince of Wales, Regent, 1748, 1817 King, 1831 death, 1835 Georgia colonised, 1662 Gerald de Barri, 224, 253 Geraldines, the, 906 Gewissas, 19 Gibraltar, sieges of, 1594, 1707, 1717 Gilbert discovers terrestrial magnetism, 1296 Gilbert, Sir Humphry, 1045 Gildas, 23 Gilds, 175, 372—381 Ginkell, General, 15 16 Giraldus Cambrensis, see Gerald Gladstone, Mr., 1847, 1850 Glamorgan, conquest of, 312 Glanvill, Ralph, 209 his treatise on law, 226 Glastonbury, 67 Arthur's tomb at, 226, 317 Glencoe, massacre of, 1497, 1498 Glendower, see Glyndwr Gloucester, Duke of, son of Edward the Third, 506, 507 Gloucester, Eleanor Cobham, Duchess of, 534 Ciloucester, Gilbert, Earl of, 298, 301 Gloucester, Humphry, Duke of, 535, 536, 543, 545 his library, 582 Gloucester, Richard, Duke of, see Richard the Third Gloucester, Richard, Earl of, 293, 294, 296 Gloucester, Robert, Earl of, 193 Gloucester, siege of, 1149 Glyndwr, Owen, 515, 516 Goderich, Lord, 1832 Godfrey, Sir Edmondsbury, 1405, 1406 Godolphin, Earl of, 1533, 1545, 1569 Godwine, Earl of Wessex, 128, 130 exiled, 131 returns and dies, ib "Goliath, Bishop," 228 Vol. L pp. I — 468 ; Vol. II. pp. 469 — 931 ; Vol. HI. pp. 933 — 1409 ; Vol. IV. pp. 141 1 — 1850. INDEX 1889 Gondomar, Count of, loii, 1013 Goodrich, Bishop of Ely, 700 Goojerat, battle of, 1844 Government, Act of, 1265 Instrument of, 1240, 1243, 1245 Gower, poet, 572 Caxton's edition of, 576 Grafton, Duke of, 1687, 1696 Granville, Earl, 1623 ; sdc Carteret Grattan, 1 714, 1781 Greek, revived study of, 595, 596 Greene, Robert, 805, S62, S63, 868 Greenvil, Sir Bevil, 1146 Greenway, Jesuit, 987 Greenwich Observatory founded, 1303 Gregory the Great, Pope, 31 Alfred's translation of his Pastoral, 97 Grenville, George, his ministry, 1676 — 1681 Grenville, Lord, 1803 — 1805 Gresham, Sir Thomas, 786 Grey, Earl, 1835 Grey, Elizabeth, wife of Edward the Fourth, 558 Grey, John de. Bishop of Norwich, 232 Grey, Lady Jane, 717, 718, 720 Grey, Lord, Deputy in Ireland, 847, 923 Grey, Lord Leonard, 907 Grey, Sir Richard, 584 Grew, physiologist, 1304 . Grindecobbe, William, 488, 491 Grocyn, 596, 599, 601 Grosseteste, Robert, Bishop of Lincoln, 264, 275, 282, 286, 288 Gruffydd, Prince of Wales, 311 Guienne, struggle of Edward the First and Philip the Sixth for, 430 lost to England, 545 Guiscard, Robert, 138 Guise, Mary of, Regent of Scotland, 755 Guises, the, 757, 761, 762, 826 Guisnes lost to England, 731 Gunhild, sister of Swein, 116 Gunpowder, effect of its introduction, 589 Gunpowder Plot, 986, 987 Gustavus Adolphus, 1069, 1070 Guthlac, S., 60 Guthrum, King of East Anglia, 88 treaties with yElfred, 89, 93 Gwynn, Nell, 1354 f}yrth, son of Godwine, 148 Gyrwas, 22 Hadrian the Fourth, Pope, 897 Hainault, Jacqueline, Countess of, 535 Hale, Sir Matthew, 1222, 1235, 1317, 1326 Hales, John, leader of Peasant Revolt, 487 Hales, John, theologian, 1307, 1310 Hales, Sir Edward, 1453 Halidon Hill, battle of, 412 Halifax (Nova Scotia) founded, 1633 Halifax, Savile, Viscount, 1412, 141O, 1418, 1424, 1425, 1427, 1428, 1453, 1477 share in the Revolution, 1489, 1491 Privy Seal, 151 1 Hall, Bishop and satirist, 1094 Halley, astronomer, 1303 Hamilton, Marquis and Duke of, 1106, 1 198, 1207 Hamilton, second Duke of, 121 7, 121 9 Hampden, John, resists a forced loan, 1031 refuses ship-money, iioi trial, 1103 — 1 105 judgement annulled, 11 19 charged with treason, 1 133 death, 1 148 Hampton Court Conference, 980 Hanover, Convention of, 1627 House of, 1539, 1578, 1579 severed from England, 1838 Harald Hardrada, King of Norway, 146 Harald, King of England, 127 Hardwicke, Lord Chancellor, 1599 Harfleur taken by Henry the Fifth, 520 Hargreaves, inventor of spinning-jenny, 1 732 Harlaw, battle of, 752 Harley, Robert, 1556 intrigues against Marlborough, 1563, 1568 rivalry with Bolingbroke, 1571 — 1573 countenances South Sea Company, 1590 ; see Oxford Harold, son of Godwine, 130 his administration, 131 — 133 W^elsh campaign, 311 Ki"g' ^^^ his oath to William, 144 struggle with Harald Hardrada and William. 146 death, 149 Harthacnut, King of England, 127, 128 Harvey discovers circulation of the l)lood, 1296 Haselrig, one of the five members, 1 1 33, 1222, 1242, 1269, 1275 Hasting, 98 Hastings, battle of, 148, 149 Hastings, John, claims Scottish throne, 361 Hastings, Lord, minister of Edward the Fourth. 584 Hastings, Warren, 1709 — 1712, 1740, 1741 Hatfield, battle of, 39 Havelock, Sir Henry, 1845 Hawke, Admiral, 165 1 Hawkins, John, 789, 839 Hawley, General, 1626 Heaven's Field, battle of, 41 Hengest, 12 Hengest-dun, battle of, 86 Henrietta Maria, wife of Charles the First, 1023 Henry the First, his accession, charter, and marriage, 168 — 1 70 sup]5resses revolt, 182 conquers Normandy, 183 his administration, 183, 184 struggle with Anjou, 185, 190 death, 192 ]ialace of Beaumonl, 252 dealings with \\'ales, 312 Henry the Second, his marriage and accession, 196, 197 ])erson and character, 197 199 policy, 199 Vol. I. pp. 1—468 : Vol H. i-p. 469—931 ; \ol. 111. i-p. 933—1409; Vol. l\. pp. 1411 — 1S50. INDEX Henry the Second — continued. Henry the Eighth — continued. relations with France, 199 war with France, 612 Church policy, 201 education of his children, 616 cjuarrel with Beket, 202 — 207 his "Assertion of the Seven Sacraments," war of Toulouse, 199 632 crowning of his eldest son, 204 treaty with France, 633 revolts against, 209, 212 seeks Imperial crown, 638 penance, 209 meets Francis, ib. legal reforms, 20S — 211 alliance with Charles the Fifth, ih., 640 death, 213 withdraws from the war, 645 visit to Glastonbury, 226, 317 proceedings for divorce, 646 — 649, 659, 664 dealings with Wales, 313 promises a translation of the Bible, 659 with Scotland, 359 " Head of the Church," 662, 666 with Ireland, 895—899 marries Anne Boleyn, 665 I lenry the Third, crowned, 245 Jane Seymour, 689 confirms charter, 268, 275 Anne of Cieves, ib. quarrel with Hubert de Burgh, 26S— 271 Catharine Howard, 705 character and policy, 271, 272 death, 709 marriage, 272 his will, ih., 716 misrule, 272 — 275 dealings with Ireland, 906 — 915 expedition to Poitou, 276 Henry, King of Navarre (Henry the Fourth of quarrel with Simon do Montfort, 289, 290 France), 832, 889 — 891, 971 with the barons, 292, 293 Henry of Blois, Bishop of Winchester, 195, 196 his English proclamation, 294 Henry, son of Henry the Second, 204, 205 209, treaties with France and Wales, ib. 212 war with the barons, 296 — 304 Herbert, Admiral, 1481; .ftv Torrington death, 319 Herbert, George, 972, 1094 Henry the P'ourth, see Derby Hereward, 153 king, 512 Herford, Nicholas, 461, 465, 468 relations with Parliament, 513 Herlouin of Brionne, 136 suppresses LoUardry, 514 Herrick, 1094 revolts against him, 514 — 516 Herrings, battle of the, 539 death, 516 Hertford, Earl of, 709, 711. See Somerset Henry the Fifth, King, 516 Hexham, battle of, 555 war with France, 518 — 521 historians of, 222 conquers Normandy, 522—524 Highlands subdued by Monk, 1249 marriage, 525 conquest of, 1627 treaty with France, ih. Hild, abbess of Whitby, 52 death,.//'. Hilsey, Bishop of Rochester, 700 Regency nominated by him, 535 History, English, its beginning, 73, 98 Henry the Sixth, his minority, 527, 530 under yElfred, 97 crowned at Paris, 543 its significance, 1719 marriage, 545 Hobbes, Thomas, 1293, 1310— 1314 loses Normandy and Guienne, ih. Hochkirch, battle of, 1649 birth of his son, 548 Hohenfriedburg, battle of, 1624 idiocy, 549 Hohenlinden, battle of, 1775 prisoner, 550 Holland, its relations with England and France, deposed, 554 1215, 1223— 1225, 1345— 1349, 1366, 1369, flies to Scotland, ib. 1370, 1377, 1379, 1395, 1473, 1767 prisoner, 555 Holland, Jacqueline, Countess of, 535 restored, 559 Holies, one of the five members, 11 33, 1 1 86, dies, 560 1 188, 1 192 his library, 582 Homilies, Book of, 714 Henry the Seventh, see Richmond Hooke, microscopist, 1303 king, 587 Hooker, Richard, 955 — 957 marriage, ib. Hooper, Bishop of Gloucester, 715, 727 revolts against him, ih. Hopton, Sir Ralph, 1146 title to the throne, 589 Horsa, 12, 15 his policy,. 589 — 592 Florsted, 15 character, 592 Hotham, Sir John, 1 1 39 patron of Caxton, 582 Hotspur, 514 dealings with Ireland, 904 Hough, President of Magdalen College, 0' vford. Henry the Eighth, his accession, 605 1459 person, ib. Hounslow, camp at, 1453 marries Catharine of Aragon, 611 Howard, Catharine, 705, 709 Vol. I. pp. 1—468 ; Vol. II. pp. 469-931 ; Vol. III. pp. 933—1409 ; Vol. IV. pp. 141 1 — 1850. INDEX 1S91 Howard, John, 1619 — 1621 Howard of Effingham, Lord, 837 Howden, Roger of, 223 Howe, General, 1702 — 1704 Howe, Lord, 1767 Howel Dda, Laws of, 309 Hrolf the Ganger, 135 Hubert de Burgh, sea Burgh Hubertsberg, Treaty of, 1672 Hubert WaUer, Archbishop of Canterbury, 213, 232, 383 Huddleston, Catholic priest, 1441 Huguenots, 757, 761, 762, 825, 826 in England, 145 1 Humbert, General, 1773, 1785 Hundred Years' War, its origin, 430, 431 change in its character, 518 its effect on England, 531 its end, 545 Huntingdon, Henry of, 222 Huskisson, Mr., 1832 Hussey, Lord, 682, 6S5 Hutchinson, Colonel, 941 — 943 Hyde, Anne, 1366, 1456 Hyde, Edward, 1127, 1136, 1 139. 6'tv Clarendon Hyder Ali, 1712 Ida founds kingdom of Bernicia, 23 Impositions of James the First, 989, 990 Income-tax, 1839 Indemnity, Bill of, 15 1 1, 15 1 2 Independence, Declaration of, 1703 Independents, 11 78 — 11 79 India, English and Portuguese in, 162S, 1629 French in, 1629 — 1631 Clive's victories in, 1631, 1647, 164S French withdraw from, 1672 Clive's rule in, 1708, 1709 Regulating Act, 1709 condition under Hastings, 1709 — 1712 Fox's India Bill, 1725 Pitt's, 1740 Mutiny in, 1845 transferred to the Crown, if>. India Company, East, 789, 790, 1629, 1 707 — 1709, 1836, 1845 Indies, West, acquired by England, 1769 Indulgence, Declarations of, 1336, 1377, 1381, 1458, 1461 Ine, king of Wessex, 67, 68 Ingelger, 186 Inkerman, battle of, i8.;4 Innocent HI., Pope, 232, 234, 244 Instrument of Government, 1 240, 1243, 1245, 1265 Interdict in England, 233 Inverlochy, battle of, 11 71 lona, 43 Ipswicli, Wolsey's school at, 635 Ireland attacked by I-xgfrith, 64 condition in twelfth century, 891 — 895 its concjucst, 897 — 899 John in, 899, 901 Richard the Second in, 506, 508, 904 Ireland — contiitned Henry the Seventh's policy in. 904 Henry the Eighth's, 905 — 915 English colonization under Mary, 917 — 919 revolts against Elizabeth, 919 — 926 colonization of Ulster, 927 W^ent worth in, 1081 — 1084 revolt, 1 125, 1 126 Cromwell's conquest of, 1209 — 1213 settlement, 1 251 — 1253 James the Second's dealings with, 1455, " 1498, 1499, 1503 rising in, 1500 — 1501 William's campaign in, 1514, 1515 Marlborough's, 1515, 1516 first union with England, 1223. 1253 dissolved, 1358, 1359 demands of the volunteers, 1714 made independent, ib., 1780 condition v.nder the Georges, 1738, 1775 — 1779 Pitt's dealings with, 1739, 1782. 1783 efforts of French revolutionists in. 1757 revolt of 1798, 1773, 1785 union with England, 1786 agitation for repeal, 1837 rising of Smith O'Brien, 1843 Mr. Gladstone's dealings with, 1847, 1848 Ireton, General, 1190, 1193, 1251, 1327 Irishmen, United, 1757, 1783, 1784 Iron-trade, 1729 — 1731 Isabella of Angouleme, wife of King John, 274 Isabella of France, wife of Edward the Second, 401, 402, 434. 435 Isabella of France, wife of Richard the Second. 506 Italy, its influence on English literature, 798, Soi, 805 Jacobites, 1511, 1517, 1519 revolt, 1585, 1586, 1624— 1627 decline, 1668 Jamaica, English conquest of, 1261 James the Fir>t, King of Scotland, 752 James the Fourth, King of Scotland, 716, 755 James the Fifth, King of Scotland, 755 James the Sixth of Scotland (First of England), his birth, 766 crowned, 770 struggles with Presbyterianism, 108S. 1089 person and character, 974 theory of monarchy, 974 — 976 of ecclesiastical supremacy, 979, 980 at Hampton Court Conference, 980 relaxes ]K'nal laws, 983 jirojooses union v\ ith .Scotland, 984 Jiis imjiositions, 989, 990 despotism, 995 — 998 Court and favourites, 998 — 1002 foreign jiolicy, 983, 1002—1007, loii tears out Protestation of Parliament, 1013 death, 1 023 James the Second, sec York King, 1442 revolts against, 1445 — 1447 Vol. I. pp. 1—468 ; Vol. H. pj). 469 — 931 ; \ol HI. pj). 933—1409 ; \'nl. IV. pp. 1411— 1S50. Vol.. IV— Part 40 (. I 1892 INDEX James the Second — continued. Kknneth MacAlpin, King of Picts and Scots, his vengeance, 1446, 1447 353 increases the army, 1449 Kent, English conquest of, 15 — 17 alliance with France, ih. kingdom of, 26 dispenses with Test Act, 1453 greatness under ^Ethelberht, 30 dealings with Scotland, 1455 conversion, 31 — 34 struggle with English Churchmen, 1456, 1457 fall, 34 tries to win Nonconformists, 145S subject to Mercia, 66, 76 attacks Universities, 1459 John Ball in, 483 struggle with clergy and Bishops, 1461 — 1463 revolts in, 4S6, 487, 546 — 548 birth of his son, 1 481 Complaint of Commons of, 546 — 548 deserted, 14S2, i486 Kent, Edward, Duke of, 1838 flight, 14S7 Kent, Earl of, beheaded, 411 goes to St. Germain, 1492 Kotel of S. Edmundsbury, 178 dealings with Ireland, 1455, 1498 — 1503, Kildare, Earl of, Lord Deputy of Ireland, 904, 1511 — 1514 906 death, 1538 Kilkenny, Statute of, 903 Jarrow, 71 Killiekrankie, battle of, 1496 Java won by England, 1769 Kilmarnock, Earl of, 1627 Jeanne d'Arc, 534—543 Kilsyth, battle of, 1173 Jeffreys, Chief-Justice, 1447 King, growth of his dignity, iii, 112 Chancellor, 1462 the King in council, 211, 325 Jemappes, battle of, 1759 Divine right of, 976 Jena, battle of, 1803 his feudal rights abolished, 1324 Jenkins' ear, 1601 Kingdoms, the Three, 34 Jersey, New, 1661 King's Bench, Court of, 212 Jervis, Admiral, 177 1 King's Court, the, 183, 211, 212, 325 Jesuits in England, 819 — 820 Kingship, English, its origin, 26 Jews settle in England, 161 — 163 theory of, in thirteenth century, 350 expelled, 393 Sir John Fortescue's definition of, 562 ; see return, 1254 Monarchy Joan of Arc, see Jeanne Kit's Coty House, 15 Johanna, daughter of King John, 313 Knights of the shire, 300, 332—335 John, son of Henry the Second, 213 Knolles' " History of the Turks," 801 King, 218 Knox, John, 760 loses Normandy, &c., 218 — 220 Knox's Liturgy, 109 1 his character, 231, 232 Kolin, battle of, 1635 quarrel with the Church, 232 — 235 Kunersdorf, battle of, 1650 with the barons, 237 — 239 Welsh wars, 234, 235, 313 homage to the Pope, 236 Labourers, their rise, 474—477 war with France, 236, 237 condition after Black Death, 479- -482 with the barons, 238, 239 as painted by Longland, 498, 500 signs Charter, 240 their enfranchisement refused, 491 , 492 subdues Rochester and the North, 244 Statute of, 480 dealings with Ireland, 899, 901 its failure, 498 death, 245 demand for its repeal, 547 John, King of Bohemia, 437 labour question in fifteenth and sixteenth John, King of France, 442, 443 centuries, 568, 569, 644 John the Old-Saxon, 96 La Hogue, battle of, 1 521 John the Litster, 490, 491 Lambert, General, 1198, 1263, 1275, 321 jonson, Ben. 878—881 Lambeth, treaty of, 246 Joseph the Second, Emperor, 1748, 1749 Lancaster, John, Duke of, see Gaunt Junius, 1679, 1690 Lancaster, Thomas, Earl of, 398, 401 Junto, the, 1525, 1526, 1533 Lancaster, House of, its claims to he Crown, Jurors in the shire-court, 333 511— 5i3> 550 Jury, the grand, 2IO its fall, 560 petty, 211 Land-tenure, changes in, 154, 156, 328, 329, trial by, 210, 211 642 — 644 Justices of the Peace, 327 Lanfranc at Bee, 136 Justiciar, the, 183 relations with Duke William, 143 144 Jutes, their country, 2 Archbishop of Canterbury, 158 land at Ebbsfleet, 12, 13 secures the Crown for Rufus, 166 found kingdom of Kent, 26 death, ib. Juxon, Bishop of London and Treasurer, 1060 Langport, battle of, 1173 Vol. I. pp. 1—468 ; Vol. II. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. III. pp. 933—1409; Vol. IV. pp. 141 1 — 1850. INDEX 1893 Langside, battle of, 771 Lewes, battle of, 298 Langton, Simon, 244 Mise of, 300 Langton, Stephen, Archbishop of Canterbury, Lewis the Seventh, King of France, 199, 209 233 Lewis (the Eighth) of France, in England, 244 — heads opposition to John, 238 246 produces Charter of Henry the Firs , ib. Lewis the Ninth, King of France, 296 suspended, 244 Lewis the Eleventh, King of France, 611 his care f r the Charter, 268 Lewis the Twelfth, King of France, ih. , 633 death, ih. Lewis the Fourteenth, 1363 Langton, Bishop of Winchester, 602 relations with England and Holland, 1366, Language, English, under the Normans, 228, 1372 229 claims Low Countries, 1369 Henry the Third's proclamation in, 294 makes peace at Aix-la-Chapelle, 1370 growing use of, 415 treaties with Charles the Second, 1373 — 1375, changes in Caxton's time, 579, 581 1398, 1427 used in law courts, 415, 1597 revokes Edict of Nantes, 1449, 1450 Lansdowne Hill, battle of, 1146 his power, 1467 Latimer, Hugh, 698—700 character and policy, 1469 — 1472 Bishop of Worcester, 700 attacks Flanders, 1473 imprisoned, 705, 719 Holland, ih. burned, 727, 728 Italy, 1476 Latitudinarians, 972, 1293, 1306 — 1310 Germany, ih., 1485, 1492 Laud, Bishop, 1023, 1039 Netherlands, 1522 character and policy, 1054 — 1057 designs on Spain, 1532, 1535 Archbishop of Canterbur\% 1057 acknowledges the Pretender, 1538 plans of Church restoration, 1060 — 1064 campaign of 1703, 1551 first mmister, 1085 offers terms, 1565 dealings with Scotch Church, 1090, 1091 death, 1586 sent to the Tower, 11 19 Lewis the Fifteenth, 1586, 1623 Lauderdale, Earl of, 1359 Lewis the Sixteenth, 1747, 1749, 1756, 1759, 1 761 Lauffeld, battle of, 1628 Lewis the Eighteenth, 1823, 1827 Lauzun, Count of, 15 14, 15 15 Lexington, battle of, 1 701 Law Courts, Common, 324 Lichfield, seat of Mercian bishopric, 48 English language adopted in, 1597 archbishopric of, 78 Law, national, its development under ^^Ifred, 93 suppressed, 82 Roman, in England, 247, 248 Liegnitz, battle of, 1669 of Eadgar, no, 123 Ligny, battle of, 1824 of Eadward, 129 Lilburne, John, I178, 1208, 1212 of Howel Dda, 309 Lille taken by Marlborough, 1565 Layamon, 229 '• LiJlibullero," 1483 League, the Holy, 611, 612 Lilly, head of St. Paul's School, 606 Learning, the New, 593 — 604 Limerick, siege of, 1515, 1516 its educational reforms, 605 — 609 Limitation Bill, 1427 plans of Church reform, 610 Limoges, sack of, 448 theolog)-, 618, 619 Linacre, 596 antagonism to Luther, 632, 633 Lincoln, battle of, 194 Leases, their introduction, 472, 473 Fair of, 246 Leicester, town of, 371, 372 Lincoln, John de la Pole, Earl of, 587 Leicester, Earl of, revolts against Henry the Lindisfarne, See of, 44 Second, 209 Irish monks of, withdraw to lona, 56 Leicester, Earl of, Elizabeth's favourite. 745' S32. Cuthbert at, 63, 65 836 Lindiswara, 22 Leicester, Earl of, see Montfort submit to Penda, 39 Leipzig, battle of, 1820 to Oswald, 44 Leith, siege of, 756 ceded to Ecgfrith, 63 Leland, 800 seized by /Elhelrcd, //'. Lenthall, Speaker, 1133 Lisle, Alice, 1447 Leo the Tenth, I'oik-, 616, 630, 632 Litany, the English, 706 Leofric, Earl of Mercia, 130 Literature, in Xorlhumbria, 69 — 74 Leslie, Alexander, 1 107, 1109. Seeled I'en under /Elfred, 95—98 Leslie, David, 1213, 121 5 under Dunslan, 108 Leuthen, battle of, 1649 under Ndrnians and Angevins, 221 — 229 Levant Coinjiany, 989 in fourteenth century, 416-428, 463 Leven, Alexander Leslie, Earl of, 1 1 53. "85. of iVasant Revolt, '485. 486, 493—498 See Leslie decline in fifteenth century, 533, 571 — 574 Vol. I. i>p. 1—468; Vol. 11. pp. 469—931 ; \<'l. III. pp. 933—1409; \'ol. I\. YY 1411 - 1850. 6 !•• 2 iS94 INDEX Literature — con tinned. Caxton's translations, 577 — 581 New Learning, 593 — 609 under Kli/.abeth, 797— S06, 844— S57 Elizabethan ilrania, S57 — 8S1 drama (if the Restoration, 1291 beginnings t)f journalism, 1693 literature of Wales, 306 — 309 Lithsmen of London, 377 Liturgy, the Scottish, 109 1, noi Liverpool, its rise, 1595 Liverpool, Karl of, 1S17, 1S32 Livery Companies of London, 3S5 Llewelyn ap Cruffydd, 292, 31S — 320 Llewelyn ap Jorwerth, 26S, 313—318 Loan, forced, 1030 Locke, John, 1314 — 1316 Lollardry, its origin, 464 suppressed at Oxford, 465, 466 character after- Wycl if 's death, 502 progress, 504, 505, 508 sujipressed, 514, 516, 517 under Henry the Sixth, 530 London, its position, 22 submits to Wuhhere, 59 to Ine, 67 to Offa, 76 plundered by northmen, 86 subject to .Elfred, 93 submits to William, 150 charter from him, il>. Normans in, 171 Henry the First's charter to, 175 religious revival in, 180, 181 S. Paul's Cathedral, 180 election of Stephen, 192 defies Linocent the Third, 244 Kriars in, 285 supports Earl Simon, 296, 297 its cnihtengild, 181, 376 lithsmen, 377 rising of craftsmen in, 382, 3S3 attacked by peasants, 487 supports Lollardry, 503 Lollard rising in, 516 supports Richard of York, 55 ^ declares for Edward the Fourth, 554 Its trade, 107, 787 Merchant Adventurers of, 789 its extension forbidden, 107 1 supports Shaftesbury, 1428, 1429 Plague of, 1348 Fire of, ib. sympathy with America, 1699 Londonderry, Marquis oi (see Castlereagh), 1832 Londonderry, siege of, 1500, 1501 Longchamp, William of, 213 Longland, William, 493 — 497 Lords, House of, llarley's dealings with, 1570 scheme for limiting its numbers, 1589, 1590 Pitt's dealings with, 1788 rejects Catholic emancipation, 18 1 7 dealings with Reform Bill, 1835 Lothian granted to the Scots, 355 Loughborough, Lord Chancellor, 1791 Louisburg, capture of, 1652 Louis Philippe, King of the French, 1835 Lovat, Lord, 1627 Lowestoft, l)attle of, 1347 Lowlands, the, 351 Lucknow, relief of, 1845 Luddite riots, 1815 Ludlow, General, 1251 Luneville, Peace of, 1775 Luther, 630 — 632 More's and Fisher's replies to, 633 Luttrell, Colonel, 1690 Lutzen, battle of, 1820 Lydgate, 572 Caxton's edition of, 576 Lyly, John, 801 Lyttelton, Lord Keeper, 11 39 " Mabinogion," 306 >Lickay, General, 1496 Madras, its origin, 1629 Magellan, Straits of, English explorers in, 1659, 1660 Mahrattas, 1631, 1711 Maine, county of, 142, 190, 218, 545 Major-Generals, Cromwell's, 1248, 1262 Malaccas won by England, 1769 Malcolm the First, King of Scots, 355 Malcolm the Third, King of Scots, 153, 168, 357 ^Laldon, battle of, 1 14 Malmesbury, William of, 222 Malplaquet, battle of, 1567 Malta, dispute for possession of, 1792, 1793 retained by England, 1829 Manchester massacre, 1831 Manchester, Earl of, 1149, 1153, 'I55, 1157, 1 160, 1168 Man, Isle of, conquered by Eadwine, 38 Manor, the English, 469 — 472 Manufactures, English, 433, 781 — 785, 172S — 1732, 1815 Map, Walter de, 227 Mar, Earl of, 1575, 1585 March, Edward, Earl of, 553. .S'tt' Edward the Fourth Mare, Peter de la, 450, 45 1 Marengo, battle of, 1774 Margaret, sister of Eadgar the .Etheling, 153, 357 Margaret, daughter of Henry the Seventh, 716, 755. 764. Margaret of Anjou, wife of Henry the Sixth, 545, 549, 550, 553—555, 559, 560 Margaret, the Maid of Norway, 359 Margaret of York, Ducliess of Burgundy, 55S, 588 Maria Theresa of Austria, 1593, 1605, 1621, 1634 Marignano, battle of, 633 Marlborough, Earl of, see Churchill campaign in Ireland, 1515 intrigues against William. 1519, 1543, 15-44 power over Anne, 1541, 1545 character and statesmanship, 1545 — ^547 campaign in Netherlands, 1549 — 1 551 victory at Blenheim, 1553 — 1555 Yol. I. pp. 1 — 468; Yol. II. pp. 469—931 ; \'oI. HI. pp. 933—1409; Yol. lY. pp. 1411— 1850. INDEX 1S95 M arlborough — continued. Duke, 1556 relations with the Tories, 1556 with the Whigs, ih., 1562 — 1565 victory at Raniillies, 1558 successes in Flanders, 1565 fall, 1570 Marlborough, Sarah Jennings, Duchess of, 1541 — 1543 Marlowe, Christopher, 863, 864, 868 Marriages, civil, legalized, 1836 Marsh or de Marisco, Adam, 286, 288, 290 — 292 Marshal, Richard, Earl, 274 ^larshal, William, Earl of Pembroke, 232, 245, 246, 266 Marston Moor, battle of, 1157 Marten, Henry, 1121, 1209 Martinico, English conquest of, 1672 "Martin Marprelate," 963 Mary, daughter of Charles I., 1397 Mary, daughter of Henry the Eighth, 639 Queen, 716 — 718 her policy, 719 marriage, 721 revolt against her, 720 her persecutions, 723 — 731 war with France, 73 1- death, ib. Ireland under her, 917 — 919 Mary, daughter of Henry the Seventh, 716 Mary, daughter of James, Duke of York, 1397 marriage, 1402 Queen, 1491 death, 1527 Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, 716 claims to English throne, ib., 719, 733, 745, 755 proposed as wife for Edward the Sixth, 755 marries the Dauphin, ib. returns to Scotland, 757, 75S character and policy, 758 — 760 marries Darnley, 764 her plans, 764 — 766 vengeance on Darnley, 767, 768 marries Bolhwell, 769 imprisonment and abdication, 770 escapes to England, 771 jilots against Elizabeth, 773, 774 death, 833-835 Maryland colonized, 1049 Mary of Modena, wife of James the Second, 1391 Maserfeld, battle of, 46 Masham, Mrs., 1563 Massachusetts, its settlement and charter, 1050, 1051 Puritan emigration to, 1052, 1053, 1065 defies England, 1697 — 1699 Massena, Gi;neral, 1774. 1812, 1813 Massey, dean of Christ Church, Oxford, 1459 Matilda (Edith), wife of Henry the I-"irsl, 169, 170 Matilda of Flander^, wife of William the Con- queror, 143 Matilda, the Empress, daughter of Henry the First, 185, 191, 194 ^launay, .Sir Waiter, 479 Maurice, Prince, 1149, 1157 Mayflo-iuer, the, 1050 Mayne, Cuthbert, 819 Meaux, siege of, by Henry the Fifth, 525 Medeshamstead, 60 Medicis, Catharine of, 762, 770, 825. 826 Medina Sidonia, Duke of, 839, 841 Melbourne, Viscount, 1835, 1839 Mellitus, Bishop of London, 39 Melrose, 50 Melville, Andrew, 1088, 1089 Meon-wara, 59 Merchade, 215 Merchant Adventurers, 789 Merchant-gilds, 377 Mercia, its origin, 22 under Penda, 39 its conversion, 47 three provinces, 48 under Wulfhere, 59, 60 struggle with Wessex, 69, 76 — S3 pays tribute to Danes, 88 extent after Peace of Wedmore, 92 annexed to Wessex, 100 earldom of, 123 Merlin, prophecies of, 316, 320 Methodists, 1612 — 1618 Middlesex, electors of, their struggle with the Commons, 1689, 1690 Middlesex. Earl of, 102 1 ; sec Cranfield Millenary Petition, 973 Milton, John, 944 — 947 early poems, 1094 — 1096 " Lycidas," 1105 ecclesiastical views, 1093, 1094, 1132 later years, 1279, 1280 "Paradise Lost," 1 281 — 1284 Minden, battle of, 1650 Ministry, Sunderland's organization of, 1523 — 1525 Minorca ceded to England, 1672 restored to Spain, 171 7 Mirebeau, siege of, 218 Mise of Amiens, 296 of Lewes, 300 Model, New, of the army, 1166 — 11 70 its struggle with Parliament, 118S — 1200, 1273— 1277 disbanded, 1284, 1285 Monarchy, the new, its character and causes, 561—569 its military jiower, 589 growth under Wolsey, 634, 635, O3S height of its power, 691, 692 under Elizabeth, 806, 807 abolished, 1206 effect of the Revolution on, 1504 decline of its influence, 157S, 1579 Monasteries, tiissohilion of, 667 -671, 70O — 7°^ Monasticism, its reform under Eadgar, loS .Monk, (General, 1249, 1273, 1275 1277, 1319 Monmouth, Duke of, 1355 scheme for his succession, 141 7. 1422 (light. 1433 rebellion and death. 1444, 1445 Vol. \. Y\,. 1—468 ; \<.l. H. i)p. 469—931 ; \'..l. HI. pp. 933 1409; \ol. I\'. pp. 141 I S50. 1896 INDEX Monmouth, Geoffry of, 226 Monopolies, S13, 1072 Mons, siege of, 15 19 Montacule, Ix>rd, 6S7 Montagu, Lord, brother of \Var\vici<, 556, 559 Montagu, Ralph, 1409 Montague, Dr., 1023, 1024 Montague, his finance, 1526 — 1528 impeached, 1538 Montcalm, Marquis of, 1634, 1652— 1655 Montfort, Eleanor de, 320 Monifort, Simon of. Earl of Leicester, 2S9, 290 Governor of Gascony, 290 character, 290 — 292 heads the barons, 293 negotiates with France, 294 struggle with Henry the Third, 294 — 298 his rule, 298, 300 summons Commons to Parliament, 300 last struggle and death, 301 — ^304 Montfort, Simon of, the younger, 302 Montreal, capture of, 1655 Montrose, Earl and Marquis of, 1 107 joins the King's parly, 11 24 victory at Tippermuir, 1160 Inverlochy, 1171 Kilsyth, 1 1 73 defeat at Philiphaugh, ib. death, 121 3 Moodkee, battle of, 1841 Moore, Sir John, 1809 More, Hannah, 1619 More, Sir Thomas, 620 — 624 his " Utopia," 624 — 629 reply to Luther, 633 Speaker, 640 Chancellor, 657 resigns, 662, 677 summoned to Lambeth, 678 imprisoned, ib. death, 681 Moreau, General, 1769, 1774. 1775 Morkere, Earl of Northumbria, 133, 149, 153 Morrison, Robert, botanist, 1304 Mortemer, battle of, 141 Mortimer, House of, its claims to the Crown, 511.550 Mortimer, Roger, 41 1 Mortimer's Cross, battle of, 553 Morton, Bishop of Ely, 584, 585 his "fork," 589 Morton, Earl of. Regent of Scotland, 1087, 1088 Moscow, Napoleon's retreat from, 1819, 1820 Mountjoy, Lord, 925 Mowbray, Roger, 209 Murray, James Stuart, Earl of, 764 Regent of Scotland, 770 — 772 murdered, 774, 1087 Namur taken by Lewis the Fourteenth, 1522 by the Allies, 1527 Nantes, Edict of, 1449 revoked, ib.^ 1450 Napoleon the First, Emperor of the French (set Buonaparte), 1799 his victories over Austria and Germany, 1801, 1803 Continental system, 1S03 alliance with Russia, 1806 mastery of Europe, 1808 dealings with Spain, ib. with America, 1814 with Northern Europe, 1818 Russian campaign, 1819, 1820 fall, 1821 return, 1823 last struggle, 1823 — 1827 Napoleon the Third, Emperor, 1844, 1845 Naseby, battle of, 1171 — 1173 Nash, pamphleteer, 805, 806 Navarino, battle of, 1832 Nectansmere, battle of, 65, 352 Neerwinden, battle of, 1522 Nelson, Admiral, 1773, 1801 Netherlands revolt against Philip the Second, 770, 825, 826 English volunteers in, 828, 829 claimed by Lewis the Fourteenth, 1369 invaded, 1473, 1522 Marlborough's campaigns in, 1549, 1 551, 1556 invaded again, 1623, 1767 Neville, Anne, 559 Neville, George, Archbishop of York and Chan- cellor, 557, 559 Neville's Cross, battle of, 438 Newburgh, William of, 223 Newbury, battles of, 1149, 1 160 Newcastle, Duke of, 1623, 1634, 1637, 1669 Newcastle, Earl of, Cavalier general, 1136, 1145. 1153, "57 Newcaslle-on-Tyne founded, 165 Newton, Isaac, 1304, 1305 Newtown Butler, battle of, 1501 Niagara, Fort, 1633, 1652 Nicholas, Secretary of State, 1320, 1367 Nile, battle of, 1773 Nimeguen, Peace of, 1403 Nonconformists, expulsion of ministers, 1331 persecution of, 1336 — 1339, 1428 Non-jurors, 1508, 1509 Nootka Sound, 1751 Norfolk, Duke of, his quarrel with Henry of Lancaster, 508 Norfolk, Duke of, uncle of Anne Boleyn, 647 his policy, 657, 705 dealings with insurgents, 682 — 685 imprisoned, 709 Norfolk, Duke of, under Elizabeth, 774, 775 Norfolk, Duke of, under James the Second, 1457, i486 Norfolk, Earl of, see Bigod Norfolk, Ralph of Guader, Earl of, 164 Norham, Parliament at, 361 Normandy, 134, 135 its relations with England, 1 15 — 1 17 with the Angevins, 190 conquered by Philip, 218 — 220 Vol. T. pp. I -468 ; Vol. H. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. HI. pp. 933—1409 ; Vol. IV. pp. 1411 — 1850. INDEX 1897 Normandy — continued. reconquered by Henry the Fifth, 521 — 524 Bedford's rule in, 543 lost again, 545 Normandy, Richard the Fearless, Duke of, 135 Normandy, Robert Curthose, Duke of, 165, 166, 168, 182, 183 Normandy, Robert, Duke of, 139 Normandy, William Longsword, Duke of, 135 Normandy, William the Conqueror, Duke of, see William Normans, their settlement in Gaul, 135 conquests, 138 North, Lord Keeper, 1446 North, Lord, minister of George the Third, 1696, 1697, 1705, 1708, 1712, 1713, 1782 Northampton, Assize of, 211 battle of, 550 Council of, 204 treaty of, 41 1 Northampton, John of, mayor of London, 503 North Briton, the, 1678 North-folk, 19 Northmen, 83 — 86. See Danes, Ostmen Northumberland, Duke of (j-tr Warwick), 716 — 718 Northumberland, Earl of, under Elizabeth, 773, 775 Northumberland, Percy, Earl of, under Henry the Fourth, 514 Northumberland, Robert Mowbray, Earl of, 166 Northumbria, kingdom of, 23, 29 its extent, 34 greatness, 34—38 conversion, 38, 39 Irish missionaries in, 41 — 46 Cuthbert in, 49 — 52 ecclesiastical strife in, 54 — 56 extent under Ecgfrith, 62, 63 its fall, 64—65, 76 literary greatness, 69 — 74 submits to Ecgberht, 83 to the Danes, 87 to Eadward, loi to .'Ethelstan, 102 earldom of, 106, 123 its northern ])art. granted to the Scots, 355 Norwich, rising of John the Litster at, 491 Nottingham, peace of, 87 Nova Scotia contjuered, 1632, 1633 ceded by France, 1672 Noy invents ship-money, 1099 Gates, Titus, 1404 — 1407, 1509 O'Brien, Smith, 1843 Occlevc, 572 Ockham, 287, 452 O'Connell, Daniel, 1833, 1835, '836, 1839 Odo, Archiiisho]) of Canterbury, 103, 107 Odo, Hishoji of Bayeux, 150, 164, 166 Offa, King of Mercia, 76 82 Oglethorpe, (jeneral, 1662 Ohio Company, 1 633 Oldcastle, Sir John, 502. See Cobham O'Neil, Hugh, 121 3 O'Neil, Owen Roe, 1206 O'Neill, Hugh, 924, 925 O'Neill, Shane, 919—921 Orange, William the First, Prince of, 826, 832 Orange, William the Second, Prince of, 1205 Orange, W^illiam the Third, Prince of, i^^ William Orangemen, 1784 Ordainers, the Lords, 39S Ordeal, 21 1 Orders in Council, 1805, 1807, 1S13, 1817, iSiS Ordinance, Self-denying, 1168 for Suppression of Blasphemies, 1197 Orleans, Duke of. Regent of France, 1586 Orleans, Henrietta, Duchess of, 1375 Orleans, siege of, 537 — 541 Ormond, Earl of, general in Ireland, 1150 invites Charles the Second thither, 1206 besieges Dublin, 1209 Duke and Lord Steward, 1319 Governor in Ireland, 1360 retires, 1367 returns to the Council, 1391 Ormond, second Duke of, 1575, 1580, 1586, 15S8 Orthes, battle of, 1821 Osbern's lives of English saints, 222 Osney Abbey, 252 Ostmen, 103 Oswald, Bishop of Worcester, 108 Oswald, King of Northumbria, 43 — 46 Oswiu, King of Northumbria, 47, 55 Otford, battle of, 76 Othere's voyage, 94 Otto of Saxony, Emperor, 215, 235, 236 Oudenarde, battle of, 1565 Oudh, annexation of, 1845 Overbury, Sir Thomas, 100 1 Oxford besieged by Stephen, 194, 195 town, 248 — 252 Vacarius at, 248 friars in, 285, 286 Provisions of, 293, 294 Charles the First at, 1144, 1145 siege of, 1 155 Parliament at, 1426 University, 252 — 255, 257 — 260 drives out a I'apal Legate, 276 Lollards at, 465, 466 decline in fifteenth century, 573 Duke Humphry gives his library to, 582 the New Learning at, 596, 599—601, 60S, 609 Cardinal College at, 609, 637 Protestants at, 697 religious changes in, S16 decrees passive obedience, 976 struggle with James the Second. 1459- 14(11 Jacobites in, 1586 Oxford, Earl of, xnuler Henry the Seventh, 591 Oxford, Earl of, son-in-law of Cecil, 820 Oxford, llarley, Earl o{ (see Harley), 1573, 1580 PACKKNirAM, General, 1S22 Palatinate ravaged by Lewis the I'Ourteenth, 1492 l*ale, the English, in Ireland, 899, 901 Vol. I. pp. 1—468 ; \ol. n. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. HI. |)p. 933—1409 ; \nl. 1\'. pp I4II — 1S5O. 1898 INDEX Palmerston, Viscount, 183S, 1844— 1846 j I'miipeluna, siege of, 1820 J'anclulf, Cardinal, 236, 266, 26S Papacy, its claims on the Knglish Church, 269, 454, 455 its jurisdiction rejected, 664 — 666 Mary's submission to, 722 rejected again, 747 Paris, English students at, 252, 256 Henry the Sixth crowned at, 543 declares for Charles the Seventh, 544 surrenders to the allies, 1821, 1827 Peace of, 1672, 1S44 Paris, Matthew, 277, 278 Parker, Matthew, Archbishop of Canterbury, 748, 750, 800 Parliament, Commons summoned to, 300 growth in thirteenth century, 329 — 344 changes in its composition, 444, 445 two Houses, 446 superseded by permanent committee, 507 deposes Richard the Second and elects Henry the P^ourth, 510 — 512 position under House of Lancaster, 513, 514 importance during Wars of Roses, 562, 569, 570 decline under Edward the Fourth, 570 revival under Richard the Third, 585 Henry the Seventh's dealings with, 589 struggle with Wolsey, 640, 641 revival after his fall, 657 undertakes Church reform, 659 revival under Cromwell, 692 opposes Mary's Church policy, 719, 723 position under Elizabeth, 809 — 813 relations with the Crown, 981 suspension under Charles the First, 1067 struggle with Charles the Second, 1381, 1393— 1397 Danby's dealings with, 1397 — 1400 Roman Catholics excluded from, 1407 James the Second's attempt to"regulate," 1458 position after the Revolution, 1505 — 1507 composition after union with Scotland, 1559 after union with Ireland, 1786 relations with the Press, 1677 — 1679, 1692, 1693 Admonition to, 957 Acts of, see Statutes reform of, 1690 — 1692, 1722, 1736, 1S17, 1835, 1847 Barebones' Parliament, 1234 the Cavalier, 1327 — 1331, 1409 Club, 532 Convention, 1320 — 1324 Good, 449 — 451 Pong, its proceedings in 1640, 11 17 — 11 19 in 1641, 1119 — 1124 Grand Remonstrance, 11 29 schemes of Church Reform, 1129 — 1 132 five members, 1133 — 1136 prepares for war, 1 138, 11 39 dealings with religion, 1 181 — 1 183, 1 188, 1 197 with the army, 11 88 — 1 194 Oxford, 1426, 1427 Rump, 1200, 1208, 1229 — 1231 Parliament — continued. Short, 1 109 of 1604, 983 — 986; of 1606, 987 ; of 16 10, 990 ; of 1614, 992—995 ; of 1621, 1007— IO15 ; of 1624, IO21 ; of 1625, 1023 ; of 1628, 1033 — 1042; of 1654, 1242 — 1245; of 1655, 1261 — 1267 ; of 1658, 1269, 1270 ; of 1659, 1271 — 1273; of 1679, 141 1, 1416; of 1680, 1421 — 1426; ofl6Sl, 1426, 1427; of 1686, 1443; of 1690, 1512; of 1696, 1527; of 1698, 1533; of 1701, 1537; of 1702, 1539; of 1784, 1725,1726; of 1832, 1833, and 1835, 1835 ; of 1859, 1846 ; of 1868, 1847 ; of 1874, 1850 Irish, under Wentworth, 1084 under James the Second, 1501 under the Georges, 1777 — 1779 its indejiendence restored, 1714, 1738, 1780 rejects free trade, 1739, 1783 action as to Regency, 1786 Scottish, the "Drunken," 1359 Parma, Duke of, 832, 835, 837 Parr, Catharine, 709 Parry's plot, 833 Parsons, Jesuit, 819, 820 Partition, Treaties of, 1532 — -1534 Paston Letters, 574 Paterson, William, financier, 1526 " Patriots," 1599 Paul, Czar of Russia, 1792, 1793 Paulinus, 38, 41 Pavia, battle of, 644 Peasant revolt, 485 — 492 Peel, Sir Robert, 1832, 1833, 1835, 1839, 1842 " Peep-o'-Day Boys," 1784 Peerage Bill, 1589, 1590 Pelham, Henry, 1623, 1634 Pembroke, Earls of, sec ^Iarshal, Striguil Pembroke, settlement of, 312 Penda, King of Mercia, 39, 46, 47 Pengwyrn becomes Shrewsbury, 76 Peninsular war, 1808 — 1813, 1818, 1819 Penn, William, 1428, 1661 Pennsylvania founded, 1428, 1661 Penry, author of Marprelate tracts, 964 Perceval, Spencer, 181 1, 181 7 Percy, see Hotspur, Northumberland Perrers, Alice, 451 Perth, Convocation of, 368 Peterborough, Earl of, 1557, 1562, 1563 Peterborough founded, 60 burnt l)y Danes, 87 Benedict of, 223 Peters, Hugh, 11 78 Petition of Grievances, 992 Millenary, 973 of Right,' 1035, 1037 " Petitioners" and " Abhorrers," 1423 Petitions changed into Statutes, 447 Petre, Father, 1457 Petty, Sir William, 1298 Pevensey, 18 William lands at, 146 Phelips, Sir Robert, 1024, 1025 Philadelphia, Congress at, 1697 Vol. I. pp. I — 468 ; Vol. H. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. HI. pp. 933 — 1409; Vol. IV. pp. 14H — 1850. INDEX 1S99 Philip Augustus, King of France, 212 war with Richard the First, 213 — 218 conquers Normandy, &c. , 218 — 220 charged to depose John, 234 victory at Bouvines, 237 Philip, Duke of Anjou, King of Spain, 1535, 1536, 1586 Philip of Valois, King of France, his war \\ ith Edward the Third, 431 — 438 Philip (the Second of Spain) son of Charles the Fifth, marries Mary Tudor, 719, 721 supports Elizabeth, 755 turns to Mary Stuart, 764 position and character, 822 — S25 conquers Portugal, 831 defeat of his Armada, 839 — 84 1 designs on P'rance, 731, 890, 891 Philiphaugh, battle of, 1173 Philippines, English conquest of, 1672 Pict-land, 352, 353 Picts attack Britain, 9, 10 defeated, 14 subdued by Ecgfrith, 62, 352 rise against him, 64, 65, 352. 353 Piers the Ploughman, 493 — 49S Pilgrimage of Grace, 682 — 6S5 Pilgrim Fathers, 1050 Pillnitz, Conference of, 1756 Pinkie Cleugh, battle of, 755 Pitt, William, 1599 enters office, 1624 character, 1637 — 1647 supports Frederick the Second, 1649 policy towards America, 1651, 1652 opposed by the Whigs, 1669 fall, 167 1 recalled, 1677, 1682 denounces the Stamp Act, 1682, 1683 returns to office, 1687. A'c Chatham Pitt, William, the younger, 1720, 1721 his plan of reform, 1722 Chancellor of the Exchequer. //'. first minister, 1725 his character, 1726, 1727 policy, 1734, 1735 bill for Parliamentary reform, 1736 — 1737 his finance, 1737, 1738 treaty of commerce with France, 1739 dealings with Ireland, ib., 1782, 1783, 1785, 1786, 1790, 1791 with foreign politics, 1748 — 175^' 1753' 1755' 1756, 1759— 1761 supports Eibel Act, 1753 gives Constitution to Canada, ib. financial difficulties, 1769 dealings with the peerage, 1788 resigns, 1 791 returns to office, 1799 death, 1802 I'itlsburg, 1652 I'lace Bill, 1507 Plassey, battle of, 1648 i'lattsburg, English attack on, 1822 I'laucn, battle of, 1650 J 'leas, Court of Common. 212 Poitiers, battle of, 442, 443 Poland, disputed election in, 1599 partition of, 1748 Pole, Reginald, 6S5, 687, 722 Pollock, General, 1840 Poll-tax, 485 ■■ Popish Plot," 1404 — 1409 Portland, Duke of, 1763, 1806, 181 1 Port Mahon taken by the French, 1635 Porto Bello captured by Vernon, 1603 I'ortreeves of London, 171, 175 Portsmouth, Louise de Querouaille, Duchess of, 1354, 1423, 1426, 1441 Portugal conquered by Spain, 831 Wellington's campaigns in, 1811 — 1813 Poynings, Sir Edward, 904 Pragmatic Sanction, 1593 Prague, battles of, 1007, 1635 Prayer, Book of Common, 712, 714 Scottish, 1091, iioi Presbyterianism in England, 952, 953, 957, 962, 966, 1131, II32 in Ireland, 1777 in Scotland, 1089, 1494, 1498 Press, regulated by Star-Chamber, 963 censorship of, abolished, 1434 proposal to revive, 1528 growth of its influence, 1677, 1678 Grenvilles struggle with, 1678, 1679 influence on Parliament, 1692 beginnings of journalism, 1693 Preston, battle of, 1198 Preston Pans, battle of, 1625 Pride's Purge, 1200 Printing, invention of, 575 Protectorate, the, 1 241, 1242 Protestants, their triumph under T. Cromwell, 700—705 under Hertford, 71 1> 7i2 persecuted under Mary, 720 — 727, 729—731 growth under Elizabeth, 814 — 817 fortunes on the Continent, 967 — 971 attitude at Elizabeth's death, 971 French, see Huguenots Prussia rises against Na]:>oleon, 1820 I'ulteney, head of the " Patriots," 1599 Punjaub, annexation of, 1844 I'urilanism, its rise, 937 temper, 938—944, 979 growth, 962 Laud's struggle with, 1055 — 1060 its attitude towards the stage, 1097 fall, 1278, 1285 work, 12S5 ideal, 1288 revolt against, 1290 — 1293 Puritan clergy exjielled, 986 emigration to America, 1065 Pym, John, 1035, 1037, nil -11 [5 his tJrand Kt-monstrance, 1129 plans for Church reform, II30, 1131 charged with treason, 1 133 |)roj)oses ti-rnis with Scolhtnd. Ii4i> death, 1 1 53 his corpse oulr.iged, 1327 Vol. I. p|,. 1—468; \'ol. 11 pp 469—931 ; \..l. III. pp. 033—1400; \' I\ >p. 141 1 — 1S50. IQOO INDEX Quakers, persecution of, 133S released, 1379 Quarles, 1094 Qiiatre Bras, battle of, 1824 Quebec, capture of, 1652 — 1655 (^uiberon, battle of, 165 1 " Quo Warranto," 390 Radicals, 1S31 Rasdwald, King of East-Anglia, 34, 35, 39 Rahere founds S. Bartholomew's, Sniilhfieid, 181 Railways, 1S37 Raikes, founder of Sunday Schools, 1619 Ralegh, his " History of the World," 801 friendship with Spenser, 847, 848 discovers Virginia, 1046 last expedition and death, 1004, 1005 Ramillies, battle of, 1558 Ray, John, zoologist, 1304 Reform, Economical, 1722 Parliamentary, st-e Parliament Reformation, the, its beginning, 630 antagonism to the Renascence, 632 Regicides, their fate, 1320, 1 321 Reginald, sub-prior of Canterbury, elected Arch- bishop, 232 Remonstrance, the (Irand, 11 29 Renascence, see Learning, New Restoration, its social effects, 1290 — 1292 Revolution, the English, 1487 — 1491 results, 1504 — 1509 the French, 1747, 1749, 175I) 1756 — 1761 of 1830, 1S35 of 1848, 1843 Rhys ap Tewdor, prince of South Wales, 312 Rich, Edmund, see Edmund Richard the First, son of Henry the Second, his rebellions, 209, 212 Crusade, 213 wars with France and alliance with Germany, 215 builds Chateau-Gaillard, 215, 216 releases Scotland from homage, 359 death, 218 Richard the Second, son of the Black Prince, acknowledged heir to the Crown, 451 King, 485 dealings with Peasant Revolt, 487 — 491 takes government in his own hands, 506 truce with France, td. marriage, z/>. character, id. rule, 507 banishes Henry of Lancaster, 508 expeditions to Ireland, 506, 508, 904 prisoner, 510 deposed, td. Richard the Third, patron of Caxton, 582 King, 584—587 Richmond, Edmund Tudor, Earl of, 585 Richmond, Henry Tudor, Earl of, 585 victory at Bosworth, 587. See Henry the Seventh Richmond, Margaret Beaufort, Countess of, 585 Ridley, Bishop of London, 719, 727 Right, Claim of, 1494 Petition of, 1035— 1037 Rights, Bill of, 1504 Declaration of, 1489 — 149 1 Rivers, Earl, father of Elizabeth Woodville, 558 Rivers, Earl, brother of l"]lizabeth Woodville, his "Sayings of the Philosophers,"' 581, 582 executed, 584 Rizzio, 764, 765 Robinson, John, Brownist minister, 963, 1049 Rochelle, Buckingham's expedition to, 1033 its fall, 1039 Roches, Peter des, 266, 275 Rochester, Carr, Viscount, looi Rochester, Laurence Hyde, Earl of, 1435, HS*^' ^^^^ Rochester, siege of, by William the Second, 166 Rochester, Wilmot, Earl of, 1290 Rochford, Lord, 647 Rockingham, Marquis of, 1682, 1686, 1714, 1722 Rodney, Admiral, 1715 Roger, Bishop of Salisbury and Justiciar, 194 Roger, son of William Fitz-Osbern, 164 Rohese, wife of Gilbert Beket, 196 Rome, Cnut at, 124 Church of, its revival in sixteenth century, 967—971 Roses, Wars of the, their beginning, 549 results, 561 — 564 Ross, General, 1822 Rossbach, battle of, 1649 Roucoux, battle of, 1628 Rouen, siege of, by Henry the Fifth, 522 — 524 Henry the Sixth at, 543 submits to Charles the Seventh, 545 "Roundheads," 1132 Roundway Down, battle of, 1 147 Royal Society, the, 1297 — 1303 Runnymede, 240 Rupert, Prince, at Edgehill, 1143 at Reading and Brentford, 1 145 at Chalgrove, 1 147 enters Vork, 1 157 defeated at Marston Moor, id. at Xaseby, 1171, 1173 commands a fleet for Charles the Second, 1205, 1212, 1213, 1347 returns to the Council, 1391 his " drops," 1301 Russell, Admiral, 1519, 1521 enters the Ministry, 1526 resigns, 1533 impeached, 1538 Russell, Lord John, 1843, 1844 Earl, 1847 Russell, William, Lord, leader of Country party, 1381 enters the Council, 141 1 resigns, 1423 beheaded, 1432 Russia, its policy in eighteenth century, 1634, 1748, 1773, 1774, 1792, I793> 1801, 1806 quarrel with Napoleon, 1818 — 1820 Russian Company, 789 Vol. L pp. 1—468; Vol. H. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. HL pp. 933—1409; \o]. IV. pp. 1411 — 1S50. INDEX 1901 Rutland, Earl of, 553 Ruyter, Admiral De, 1227, 1259, 1347, 1379 Rye House Plot, 1432 Ryswick, Peace of, 1529 Sacheverell, Dr., 1567, 156S St. Albans, its historical school, 277, 278 revolt of its burghers, 488, 491 battles at, 549, 553 St. Edmundsbury, its origin, 88 history, 175 — 178 confirmation of its privileges, 490 St. John, Henry, 1556, 1563. See Bolingbroke St. Paul's School, 605, 606 St. Ruth, General, 1516 St. Vincent, Cape, battles of, 1715, 1771 Salamanca, battle of, 18 19 Salisbury, Earl of, adherent of Richard the Second, 509, 516 Salisbury, Earl of, partisan of York, 549, 550 beheaded, 553 Salisbury, Margaret, Countess of, 685, 687 Salisbury, Robert Cecil, Earl of, 990, 1000, 1002 Sancroft, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1461, 1489, 1509 Sandwich, Montagu, Earl of, 1319 San Sebastian, siege of, 1820 Saratoga, Burgoyne's surrender at, 1 704 Sarsfield, General, 1515, 15 16 Sautre, William, 514 Savoy, Boniface of, Archbishop of Canterbury, 272 Savoy, Peter of, 272 Savoy, Prince Eugene of, 1549, 1553, 1565 Savoy, the, 272 sacked, 488 conference at, 1328 Saxe, Marshal, 1624, 1627 Saxons, their home-land, 2 East, their settlements, 19, 20 West, conquer Southern Britain, ib. defeated at Faddiley, 29 conquer Somerset, 62, 66, 67 conquer Dyvnaint, 78 South, kingdom of, 18 "Saxony," 351, 352 Say and Sele, Lord, iioi, 1320 Say, Lord, 547, 548 Scholasticism, 287, 288 Schomberg, Duke of, 1 51 2, 15 13 Schools founded under Henry the Eighth, 608 under Edward the Sixth, 715 " Circulating," 1610 National, 1836 Sunday, 161 9 Science, English, its beginnings, 1295 — 1304 Scinde, annexation of, 1840 Scotland, condition in thirteenth century, 351 kingdom of, its origin, 353 relations with I^ngland, 353 — 359 first conquest of, 361 — 364 second, 365—368 revolt under Bruce, 404 — 410 its indei)endencc recognized, 41 1 Scotland — continued. alliance w ith France, 505 history after Bruce, 751 — 755 Elizabeth's dealings with, 755, 756 union with England proposed, 984 relations with the Stuarts, loSS — 1091 revolts against Charles the First, 1106 — IIIO reaction in, 1 196 condition under Cromwell, 1249 under Charles the Second, 1359 acknowledges William and Mary, 1494 first union with England, 1222, 1249 dissolved, 1359 second union, 1561 Jacobite risings in, 1585, 1586, 1624 — 1627 Scots attack Britain, 10 their origin, 353 submit to Eadward the Elder, loi, 355 league with the Percies, 514 in service of France, 534 Scrope, Archbishop of York, 515 Sculage, 208, 242 Sea-Dogs, the, 829 Sebastopol, siege of, 1844 Securities Bill, 1394, 1416, 1425 Sedgemoor, battle of, 1446, 1447 Sedley, Sir Charles, 1290 Seminary Priests, 818 Seneff, battle of, 1475 Separatists, 962 Seven Years' War, its beginning, 1634 its effects, 1659 end, 1672 Seville, treaty of, 1594 Seymour, Jane, 689 Shaftesbury, Earl o{ {sec Ashley, Cooper), 1379 character and career, 1383 — 1385 policy, 1385— 1 39 1 dismissed, 1393 new policy, 1393— .1395 demands a dissolution, 1399 imprisoned, //;. dealings with Popish Plot, 1406— 1409^ 1419— 1422, 1425 President of Council, 1411 plans for Monmouth's succession, 1417 dismissed, 1421 recalls Monmouth, 1422 fall and death, 1428— 1430 Shakspere, 864—878 Shaxton, Bishoji of Salisbury, 700 Shelburne, ].ord, 1677, 1689, 1720 Sherborne, see of, 67 Sheriff, his function in the shire-court, 332 Sheriffmuir, battle of, 1585 Ship-money, 1099, iioo declared illegal, II 19 Shire, Knights of the, 300, 333-335 Shire-court, 332, m Shrewsbury (Scrobsbyryg), 76 battle of. 515 Shrewsbury, Ihike of, 1575, 1576 Shrewsbury, I'^arl of, Secretary of Stale, 151 1 •527 Shrewsbury, Tall»)l, llarl nf, 544, 545 Vol. L lip. 1—468; Vol. If. pp. 469-931 ; Vol HI. pp. 933—1409; Vol. I\'. yy. 1411— 1850. J902 INDEX Sidmouth, Lord, 1803 Sidney, Algernon, 1431 — 1433 Sidney, Sir Henry, 921 Sidney. Sir Piiilip, 802—805, S32, 845. 847 Sigeberht, king of East Anglia, 40 Sikhs, 1 63 1. 1840, 1844 Siinnel, Lainliert, 587 Siward, Earl of Northunibria, 130 Skeffington, Deputy in Ireland, 906 Slanning, Sir Nicholas, 1146 Slavery in early England, 27, 28 its decline, 1 10 disappearance, 470 colonial, abolished, 1S36 Slave-trade in early England, no, 165, S95 African, 789 movement for its abolition, 1741, 1742 abolished, 1806 Sleswick, its people in the fifth century, i Sluys, battle of, 434 Smerwick, massacre at, 923 Smith, Adam, 1733 Smith, John, settles in Virginia, 1046 — 1048 Smith, Sir Sidney, 1774 Smithfield, St. Bartholomew's Priory at, 181 Snowdon, Lords of, 313 Sobraon, battle of, 1841 Solway Moss, battle of, 755 Somevs, John, 1489, 1526 Lord Keeper, 1527 dismissed, 1533 impeached, 1538 effects union with Scotland, 1559 President of Council, 1565 Somerset, Beaufort, Duke of, 548, 549 Somerset, Carr, Viscount Rochester and Earl of, lOOI Somerset, Duke of, and James the Second, 1457 Somerset conquered by West Saxons, 62, 66, 67 Somerset, Margaret, Duchess of, patron of Caxton 581 Somerset, Protector, see Hertford invades Scotland, 755 Sonierton taken by .Lthelbald of Mercia, 69 Somerville's plot, 832 Sophia, Electress of Hanover, 1539 Soult, Marshal, 181 1, 1819, 1821 Southampton, Earl of. friend of Shakspere, 871, 873 Southampton, Earl of, Lord Treasurer, 1319, 1367 South-folk, 19 South Sea Bubble, 1590 — 1592 Southumbrians, 22 Spain, growth of its power, 611 alliance with Henr)- the Seventh, ib. under Philip the Second, 822 — 824 relations with James the First, 1002 — IOO5, loii, 1012, 1017— 1023 its decline, 1471 disputed succession in, 1532 — 1537 war in, 1562 struggle for Sardinia and Sicily, 1587 Family Compact with France, 1601 war with England, 1603, 1672 league with France and America, 1707 Spain — coiitunied. mastered by Naj^oleon, 1808 rises, 1809, 1810 Wellington's campaign in, 1818 — 1820 Speed, chronicler, 801 Spencer, Earl, 1763 Spenser. Edmund, 844 — 857 inlluence on Milton, 1094 Sports, Book of, 1059 Spurs, battle of the, 612 Stafford, Lord, 1425 Stair, Dalrymple, Master of, 1496 — 1498 Stamford Bridge, battle of, 146 Standard, battle of the, 193 Stanhope, Lord, Secretary of Slate, 1 584 his Ministry, 1589 death, 1591 Star Chamber, Court of, established, 591 regulates the Press, 963 employment by Charles the First, 1071 — 1073 abolished, 1 124 Stationers, Com]iany of, 963 Statutes, change in mode of jiassing them, 570 of Apparel, 546 Appeals, 664 liallot Act, 1849 Civil Marriage, 1836 Church Disestablishment (Ireland), 1847, 1848 Conventicle, 1336 Corn Laws, 1831 repealed, 1843 Corporation Act, 1328 Five Mile, 1336, 1367 of Grace, 1512 of Government, 1265 Habeas Corpus, 1435 suspended, 1585 Statute of Heresy, 514 repealed, 714 re-enacted, 723 India, 1740 of Indemnity and Oblivion, 1320 of Kilkenny, 903 of Labourers, 480 — 482 Land Act (Ireland), 1847 Libel, 1753 of Liveries, 591 of Merchants, 327 of Mortmain, 326 Municipal Corporations, 1836 Mutiny, 1505 Navigation, 1223, 1680 Occasional Conformity, 1555 repealed, 1586 Poor Laws, 779, 780, 1836 Poynings', 904 repealed, 17 14 of Praemunire, 454 usedby Henry the Eighth against Wolsey, 650 against the clergy, 662 of Provisors, 454 " Quia Emptores," 327, 328 Reform, 1835, 1847 Registration, 1836 Regulating, 1709 Vol, I. pp. I — 46S ; Vol. II. pp. 469 — 931 ; Vol. III. pp. 933 — 1409 ; Vol. IV. pp. 141 1 — 1850. INDEX 1903 Statutes — continued. of Rights, 1504 Schism, 1572 repealed, 1586 of Security, 1559 Septennial, 1586 of Settlement, 1539 Six Articles, 703 repealed, 711 Stamp Act, 1680 — 1681 resisted in America, 1682 repealed, 1686 of Succession, 677 of Supremacy, 666 Test, 762, 1381 set aside, 1453 Tithe Commutation, 1836 Triennial, 1 119, 1505, 1527 Toleration, 1507 of Uniformity, 74S, 1329 of Union with Ireland, 1786 with Scotland, 1561 of Wales, 321 of Winchester, 327 Steam-engine, 1731 Steinkirk, battle of, 1522 Stephen, King, 192—195, 197 Stigand, Archbishop of Canterbury, 133, 15S Stillingfleet, 1367, 1456 Stirling, battle of, 366 Stowe, chronicler, 801 Strafford, Earl of [see Wentworth), 1 109 impeached, 11 17 trial, 1 121 death, 11 23 Strathclyde, 34, 35 submits to Oswald, 44 to Eadberht, 74 to Eadward, loi granted to Malcolm, 355 Stratton Hill, battle of, 1146 Streoneshealh, see Whitby Striguil, Richard of Clare, Earl of Pembroke and, 898 Strode, one of the Five Members, 1133 Strongbow, 898 Stuart, Charles Edward, 1624 — 1627 Stuart, James Francis, son of James the Second, 1481, 1584, 1585 Stukely, 922 Sudbury, Archbishop, 487, 488 Suffolk, Earl of, minister of Henry the Sixth, 544, 545 Suffolk, Crey, Duke of (Lord Dorset), 716, 720 Suffolk, Michael de la Pole, ICarl of, 505 Sunderland, Charles, Earl of, 1556, 1562, 1569, 1589 Sunderland, Robert, Earl of, 1412, 141S, 1424, 1426, 1437, 1485 his ministerial system, 1523 1525 Supplies, grant of, made annual, 1505 Surajah Dowlah, 1647, 1648 Surrey, Henry Howard, ICarl of, 709 Surrey, John de Warrenne, Earl of, 364 Sussex, Earl of. Deputy in Ireland, 91S, 919 Sussex submits to Wulfhere, 59 to Ceadwalla, 67 to Offa, 76 Swein Estrithson, King of Denmark, 152 SwemForkbeard, King of Denmark, 115 — 117, 122 Swein, son of Godwine, 130, 131 Swithun, bishop of Winchester, 86 Sydenham, medical writer, 1304 " Tables," the, 1 103 Taillebourg, battle of, 27 Talavera, battle of, 181 1 Taunton founded, 67 Taxation regulated by Great Charter, 242 how levied, 331, 335, 336, 340 under Elizabeth, 808 arbitrary, see Benevolence, Impositions, Loan regulated by Long Parliament, 11 19 Parliament regains control over, 1505 reduced by Walpole, 1594 — 1596 during French war, 1 769 income-tax, 1839 of America, 1664, 16S0, 1681, 1695 Papal, on the English clergy, 276, 454, 455 Taylor, Jeremy, 1308 — 1310 Taylor, Rowland, 723 — 725 Temple, Earl, 1682, 1687 Temple, Sir William, 1370 Secretary of State, 1412 his Council, 1414, 1415 agrees to the Exclusion, 1424 Tenchebray, battle of, 183 Testament, New, Erasmus's edition of, 61 8 Tewkesbury, battle of, 560 Thanet, English land in, 12, 13 Augustine lands in, 31 Theatre, first erected in London, 860 Thegn, the, 112 Theobald, Archbishop of Canterbury, 196 his court, 248 Theodore, Archbishop of Canterbury, 57 — 59 his school at Canterbury, 71 Thirty Years' War, 1 005 Thistlewood, Arthur, 183 1 "Thorough,"' Wentworth's, 1080 — 1084 Thurstan, Archbishop of York, 193 Ticonderoga, Fort, 1634, 1652 Tillotson, theologian, 1310, 1367, 1456 Archbishop of Canterbury, 1509 Tilsit, Peace of, 1806 Ti])pernniir, battle of, 1160 ri])p(jo Sahil), 1773 Tithes, 58 connnulation of, 1836 Tone, Wolf, 1783 Torgau, battle of, 1669 "Tories," their origin, 1423 attitude towards (irand Alliance, I 52('> relalions with Marlborough, 15S5. 1550 withdraw from jjolitics, 1580, 1592 return, 1599, 166S gfjvcrn during French war, 1S06. See Con- servatives Vol. I. i)p. 1—468; \u\. H. pp. 469-931 ; \m1. IH. pji. 933-I409; Yd. 1\. yy. i.jii- 1S50. 1904 INDEX Torres Vedras, Wellington's ilefence of, 1812 Torrington, Herbert, Karl of, 151 1, 151 7 Tortiilf the Forester, 186 Tostig, son of Godwine, 13J, 146 Toulon, revolt of, 1767 Toulouse, siege of, 199 battle of, 1 82 1 Tourville, Admiral, 1517, 1521 Tower of London founded, 150 Towns, early English, 170 — 178 their privileges confirmed by Great Charter, 243 share in the Barons' War, 296 taxation of, 335, 336, 340 struggle for freedom, 369 — 372 social life, 372 — 381 strife of classes in, 381 — 385 charters cancelled by Charles the Second, 1437 self-government restored, 1 836. Sec Boroughs Townshend, Charles, 1677 Townshend, Viscount, 1584, 1589, 1590, 1592, 1599 Township, the old English, 4, 6 Towton, battle of, 554 Trade, English, under Eadgar, 107 under Cnut, 126, 127 under Edward the First, 387 Edward the Third, 433 Elizabeth, 782—789 with the colonies, 1594, 1661, 1680 with Spanish America, 1601 in coal and iron, 1729 — 1731 Buonaparte's efforts to check, 1792, 1803 — 1805, 1808 Huskisson's and Canning's policy towards, 1832 freedom of, 1842, 1843 Board of, 1527 Irish, 1739, 1779, 1782. .9t't' Slave-trade Trafalgar, battle of, 1801 Trent, Council of, 708, 969 Tresham, Francis, 986 Trevanion, Sir John, 1146 Trichinopoly relieved by Clive, 1631 Tromp, Admiral, 1225, 1228, 1259 Troyes, Treaty of, 525 Trumwine, Bishop of Abercorn, 63, 66 Tudor, House of, its claim to the Crown, 585. See Richmond Turgot, annalist of Durham, 222 Twysden, 800 Tyler, Wat, 486, 488—490 Tyndalc, William, 695, 696 Tyrconnell, Earl of, 1455, 1498 — 1500 Udall, author of Marprelate tracts, 964 Ulm, capitulation of, 1801 Ulster, Plantation of, 927 Universities, their rise, 247 relation to feudalism, 257 — 260 to the Church, 260, 261 influence of New Learning on, 608, 609 consulted on Henry the Eighth's divorce, 659 Universities — continued. struggle with James the Second, 1459 — 1461 religious tests abolished in, 1848 Uriconium, 20 Usher, Archbishop, 1081, 1 130 Utrecht, Treaty of, 1570 Uxbridge, Treaty of, 1170 Vacarius, 248 Val-cs-Dunes, battle of, 140 V^alley Forge, battle of, 1704 Vane, Sir Harry, the elder, 1242 Vane, Sir Harry, the younger, supports Inde- pendents, 1 131, 1 185 negotiates at Edinburgh, 1149 organizes navy, 121 2 his policy, 1222, 1223 quarrel with Cromwell, 1229 — 1 23 1 offered seat in Council, 1234 share in union with Scotland, 1249 excluded from pardon, 1321 executed, 1328 Varangians, 151 Varaville, battle of, 142 Vaudois, massacre of, 1267 Verden, dispute about, 1588 Vere, Sir Horace, 1007 Verneuil, battle of, 535 Verney, Sir Edmund, 11 28 Vernon, Admiral, 1603, 1605 Vervins, Treaty of, 891 \ espucci, Amerigo, his travels, 594, 624 Victoria, Queen, 1838 Villeins, 470, 471 become copy-holders, 472 revolt, 480 — 491 excluded from school and college, 501 decline, 499 Vimiera, battle of, 1809 Vinegar Hill, battle of, 1773, 1785 Virginia discovered, 1046 settled, ib., 1048 Vitoria, battle of, 1820 Volunteers, English, 1846 Irish, 1714, 1781 Wage, 226 Wagram, battle of, 181 1 Wakefield, battle of, 553 Walcheren expedition, 1811 Walcourt, battle of, 1494 W'ales, William the First's dealings with, 165 its literature, 306 — 309 relations with England, 309 — 312 revival in twelfth century, 313 — 318 conquest of, 320 — 322 statute of, 321 revolt in, 515, 516 Wallace, William, 365—368 Waller, Sir William, 1146, 1168 Wallingford, Treaty of, 197 Wallington, Nehemiah, 943 Wallis, Captam, 1660 Vol. I. pp. I — 468 ; Vol. II. pp. 469 — 931 ; Vol. HI. pp. 933 — 1409; Vol. IV. pp. 1411- 1S50. INDEX 1905 Wallis, Dr., 1297, 129S Walpole, Sir Robert, 15S2 — 1584 his offices in Townshend ministry, 1584 resigns, 1589 opposes Peerage Bill, 1590 returns to office, ih. his peace policy, 1592, 1593 finance, 1594— 1597 greed of power, 1599 attitude in Polish war, ib. towards Spain, 1603 fall, 1605 Walter, Hubert, see Hubert Walters, Lucy, 1355 Walworth, William, 490 Wanborough, battle of, 68 Wandewash, battle of, 1707 Warbeck, Perkin, 587, 588 Ward, Dr., mathematician, 1298 Warham, Archbishop of Canterbury, friend of the New Learning, 602 — 604 protects Church reformers, 610 supports Erasmus, 616 his share in submission of the clerg)-, 662 death, 664 Warwick, Earl of, son of Clarence, 587 Warwick, Earl of, Protector, 712. Sec North- umberland Warwick. Earl of, buys Connecticut valley, iioi commander of the fleet, 11 39 Warwick, Neville, Earl of (the King-maker), 549, 553, 554 his character and position, 555 — 557 policy, 558, 559 death, 559 Washington, English capture of, 1822 Washington, George, 1633, 1652, 1699 — 1701, 1703, 1704, 1712 Waterloo, battle of, 1824 — 1827 Watling Street, 92 Watt, James, 1731 Wearmouth, monastery at, 55 Wedmore, peace of, 89, 90 Wellesley, Marquis, 181 1 Wellesley, Sir Arthur, 1809, 181 1. .St'^ Welling- ton Wellington, Lord {see Wellesley), campaign in Portugal, 181 2 in .Spain, 1818, 1820 in France, 1821 in Belgium, 1824 — 1826 (Duke of) his ministry, 1833— 1835 Welsh, their alliance with Penda, 39 submit to Offa, 76, 82 to Ecgberht, 82 to /Ethel Stan, 102 Wentworth, Peter, 810 Wenlworth, Thomas, 994, 1033 his policy, 1079 — 1081, 1099 — iioi Deputy in Ireland, 108 1 — 1084. Sec Strafford Wesley, Charles, 1614 Wesley, John, 1614 — 1617 Wessex, kingdom of, 19, 20 its extent, 34 submits to Oswald's overlordship, 44 Wessex — continued. becomes Christian, 44 ravaged by Wulfhere, 59 revival under Centwine, Ceadwalla, and Ine, 66, 67 struggle with Mercia, 67 — 69, 78, 82, 83 attacked by northmen, 86 by Danes, 88 revival under yElfred, 90 — 98 fall, 113 — 117 earldom of, 123 Westminster Abbey, 271, 387, 388 Assembly and Confession, i i8r Parliament settled at, 344 Provisions of, 294 Weston, Lord Treasurer, 1039, 1070, 1085 Wharton, Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, 1565 Whiggamore raid, 1 198 " Whigs,"' their origin, 119S, 1423 support war against France, 1526 relations with Mailborough, 1562 — 1565 their long rule, 1580 — 1582 factions under Walpole, 1599 reunited under Pelham, 1624 oppose Pitt, 1669 divisions under Rockingham, 1720 the "Old," 1763 return to power, 1835, 1843, 1844 Whitby, abbey of, 52 synod of, 55, 56 Whitefield, 1613, 1614, 1616 W^hite Ship, wreck of the, 184 Whitgift, Archbishop, 958, 963, 966 Wiglaf, King of Mercia, 82, 83 Wilberforce, William, 1742 Wilfrid of York, 55 Wilkes, John, 1678, 1687 — 1690 Wilkins, Dr., 1297 William the Conqueror, Duke of Normandy, 139, 140 war with France, 141 subdues Maine and Britanny, 142 his rule in Normandy, ib. marriage, 143 relations with Lanfranc, ib., 144 visits F^ngland, 144 his claims, ib. lands at Pevensey, 146 victory at Senlac, 148, 149 crowned, 150 his con(|uest of England, 151 — 154 dealings with feudalism, 154 — 156 administration, 156 — 158 Church ]iolicy, 158 — 161 revolts against him, 152 — 154, 164 his rule, 164, 165 bridles .Scotland and Wales, 165 death, 166 William Rufus, King, 166 revolts against him, ib. struggle with the Church, 167, 168 Continental wars, i68 dealings with Scotland, //'. with Wales, //;., 312 death, 168 Vol. I. pp. 1—468; \'. his offices, 635 educational foundations, 609, 635 — 637 administration, 637 financial measures, 640, 641 struggle with Parliament, ib. conduct in the king's divorce case, 647, 648 fall, 649, 650 results of his career, 650, 651 Woodviile, Fli/abetii, see Grey Woodward, mineralogist, 1304 Worcester, battle of, 12 18 Worcester, Tiploft, Farl of, 533, 582 — 5S4 Wulfhere, King of Mercia, 59, 60 Wulfstan, Archl)ishoii of York, 103, 106 Wulfstan, Bishop of Worcester, 166 Wulfstan's voyage, 94 Wyatt, Sir Thomas, 720 Wycherly, 1291 Wyclif, John, 452, 453 his i)lans of reform, 458 — 460 charged with heresy, 460, 461 his " poor preachers,"' 461, 464 denies Transubstantiation, 463 his writings, //;. condenmed, 464 death, 468 translation of the Bible, //;. its effects, 504 influence in Bohemia, 508 Wykeham, William of. Bishop of Winchester, 449—451 Wyndham, Sir William, 1580, 1585, 1586 York concjuered by the Deiri, 23 by Cadwallon, 41 revolts against William the First, 152, 153 massacre of Jews at, 392 Parliament at, 401 siege of, 1 155— "57 York, Duke of, joins Henry the Fourth, 509 York, Frederick, Duke of, 1766 York, James, Duke of, Lord Admiral, 1319 marries Anne Hyde, 1366, 1456 conversion, 1372, 1373 fight with De Ruyter, 1379 resigns ofiice, 1 38 1 second marriage, 139 1 plans for his succession, 1416, 1425, 1427 see James the Second York, New, its origin, 1661 York, Richard, Duke of, Regent in France for Henry the Sixth, 544 rivalry with Henry, 548 — 550 death, 553 York, Richard, Duke of, son of Edward the Fourth, 584 York Town, surrender of Cornwallis at, 1712 Zaragoza, sieges of, 1810 Zorndorf, battle of, 1649 Zutphen, battle of, 832 Vol. L pp. I — 468 ; Vol. H. pp. 469—931 ; Vol. HL pp. 933 — 1409 ; Vol. IV. pp. 1411 — 1850. THE END RICHARD CL.\V .-^ND SONS, LIMITED, LO.VDO.V .^ND BCNGAV LIBRARY •gNIVERPTTy OF CATJFORNIA SANTA BARBARA ^9'^ THE LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Goleta, California ^ 4-THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW. (JlJiCULATiGN / i DISPLAY PEKIOD ■%^ r^"^ ^.j^^ r^- ^1^ ^ mm 53 w "^^^^^^^^^^1 8 ^^^BBHj^B^^^--. ^^^^1 mmm *fe^^