IC-HBLF JAMES G. FORLONG FUND VOL I. THE PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA Lectures delivered in 1922 at The School of Oriental Studies (Univ. of London) BY COLONEL T. C. HODSON (Late Indian Civil Service) THE ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY 74 Grosvenor Street, London, W. I. 1922 THE PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA JAMES G. FORLONG FUND VOL. I. THE PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA Lectures delivered in 1922 at The School of Oriental Studies (Univ. of London) BY COLONEL T. C. HODSON (Late Indian Civil Service) THE ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY 74 GROSVENOR STREET, LONDON, W. 1. 1922 LECTURE I. COMPLEXITY OF INDIAN CULTURE. Complexity of Indian Culture Analysis of Fundamental Elements Dream Values and Social Life Prepotency of the Past Mind and Body Belief in Reincarnation Language as a Social Product Assimilation of Customs and the Relations of Higher with Lower Cul- ture Value in situ of Customs The Selective and Comparative Method Common Elements and Range of Variable Elements. Before I attempt to define the lower culture or to describe its geographical distribution in India, let me clear the ground by emphasising the fact that primitive characters are not to be looked for in Indian culture as it now is for " existing savage races are not merely peoples who have been left behind in the stream of progress. They are not simply examples of early stages in the development of human culture beyond which other peoples have progressed. It can be shown that each one of them has a highly complex history in which rites and customs introduced from elsewhere, perhaps from some highly-advanced society, have blended with others of a really primitive or infantile kind. . . . Though existing cultures may not be primitive in the sense that they represent simple and uncontaminated stages of social development, we can safely accept the primitive character of their mentality and take them as guides to the history of mental development, though they are of very question- able value as guides to the order of social development." (la). We must therefore dismiss from our minds such catch words as arrested development or continuity of progress. Let us remember the antiquity of India, the complexity of its social groupings, and the immense range of its culture. -.. 2 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA ELEMENTS. We are all psychologists nowadays. True, the psyche is seldom^ mentioned in the discussions of this rigorous science. fAs I look for the elements of the mental make- up of folk in the lower culture, I find their attitude characterised by the dominance of tradition, and I can ask you from my own knowledge to accept the view put forward by Dr. Rivers whose eminence as a psychologist is as secure as his distinction both as an anthropologist and a historian of the past of human societies. From his personal knowledge of the lower culture in India, in Melanesia and the Torres Straits, he finds that " it is a striking feature of ethnographical investigation among people of lowly culture that it is impossible to obtain any rational explanation of rites and customs even when such explanation would seem to us obvious. The people are content to follow without question their social customs and to practise the often highly elaborate rites of their religion merely because it has been so ordained by their fathers " (2). For my part I think the lack of rational explanations of institutions or customs can be associated with the value assigned to dream experiences. Thus " The Tangkhuls say that a man who is attacked by a buffalo will lose any lawsuit in which he happens at that time to be involved. They also believe that if a man dreams that he is attacked by a buffalo, he will suffer similar misfortune. They attach to the dream precisely the same significance as to the actual event. Does this mean that their dreams are as substantial and possess the same measure of reality as the facts of their waking vision ? If this conclusion were legitimate on these facts, the dream life would have a continuity with the waking life and possess a specific reality for them. The inter- pretation of unusual dreams is left to the maiba or to some wise old man. "(3) With the Andamanese there are " certain individuals known as oko-pai. ad (lit a dreamer) who are credited PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 3 with the possession of supernatural powers such as second sight and of a mysterious influence over the for- tunes and lives of their neighbours." He exploits his reputation thoroughly and must show proof from time to time of his power. He can bespeak property which then is not available for presentation to anyone else. He is " credited with the power of communicating in dreams with the invisible powers of good and evil and also of seeing the spirits of the departed or of those who are ill." (3a) Among the Sema Nagas (3b) " there are probably many other forms of genna practised by the thumomi who, indeed, probably invent new forms of what- ever kind and whenever they see fit." He is an interpreter of omens, a dreamer, clairvoyant. . . . Dreams, like omens, are not the exclusive province of the thumomi, and happen to anyone. Indeed, most Semas believe in their own dreams and take note of them as forecasting events to come, in particular those of hunting and war." Throughout this area we find a constant belief in and attribution of authority and prestige to those who dream dreams, who see visions, and are thereby known to be in touch with sources of power external to the individual. Of the Kols, it is said that " Daher gibt der Kol viel auf Traume Weil seine Seele im Schlafe heller sieht and mit der Geisterwelt verkehrt, die ihr im wachen Zustande mehr oder minder verschlossen ist. . . . Traume sind dem Kol Offenbarungen aus der Geisterwelt " (4). I take these cases as samples of the ample evidence that " many peoples still trust greatly to the value of dreams as guides to the ordering of their daily conduct "(5). The dream " the form in which experience becomes manifest in sleep " has " the characters of infancy " which modern psychology regards as " due to the removal in sleep of the higher controlling levels " (6). The de- termination of conduct by reference to experience divested 4 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA of higher controls, especially when that class of experience is deemed of special value, will help to understand the behaviour using that word in a large sense of the lower culture. Yet we must confess that " the determina- tion of social behaviour by the unconscious is not confined to rude culture but is only somewhat more obvious in it than among more highly civilised peoples " (7). Further, in the practice of referring unusual dream experiences to " some wise old man," we see a means whereby the wise old man may influence traditional evaluations to his own advantage or to the advantage of his own class, and a means by which the continuity of tradition can be secured from excessive inroads of novel ideas. That changes in and modifications of important elements of the social fabric have occurred from time to time is certain even in the most lowly groups, and we thus can realise how these changes can be effected. These beliefs have a real objective existence. They are therefore proper material for examination. They are associated with and form part of a whole of an organically inter-related interdependent corpus or mass of traditional institutions and customs, which cover the whole field of social activity. How vast that field is we may realise by remembering that " an elaborate philosophy " (8) has been evolved by the least advanced Australian group. Systems in their way no less elaborate are to be found among groups of the lower culture in India. The tradi- tional views, as we regard them, are in truth living forces, harmonised, or tending to be harmonised, by social continuity with all other manifestations of social activity, because these beliefs are lived rather than thought out, vegus plutot que pensees. What we regard as traditional and unreasoned, because it appears unreasonable to us, is in the lower culture viewed as reasonable and valid, even more authoritative and important than the data which with us serve as the basis of reasoning. Thus in framing our definition of the lower culture from a PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 5 psychological aspect we must assign due weight to these factors the dominance of tradition or custom and the superior validity allowed to experiences dreams, hyper- aesthetic apparitions and the like which seem to spring from the liberation of the unconscious elements of mind from the controls imposed by education and normal life. The formation of special interests and values by these processes deserves attention as a possible source of other cultural features. The actions and reactions of the lower culture with its physical environment are affected by these habits. " Environment " is more than the physical environment (9), complex and difficult of analysis as that is. The society in which we live and move and have our being is part of our environment. The past age- long as it is forms part of our environment, for it is active in shaping the conditions as well as our institutions of the present. The prepotency of the past is a char- acteristic of the lower culture. Current in the lower culture are ideas as to the nature of man, psychological ideas they may be called, which express clearly after the manner of the lower culture an unmistakable recognition as well as an explanation of the dominion of the past. The ideas we form of the nature of the physical environ- ment, of the nature of our relations with the physical environment, with our fellow-beings, both with those who constitute our society and those who are members of other societies in contact with our own, affect and help to determine our behaviour. We know chat the processes of forgetting of unwitting repression are not less important, not less worthy of critical investigation than those of memory (10). The student of human culture finds matter for study in the processes which produce stagnation, even retrogression, which cause the abandon- ment of useful arts (11), which cause societies to refuse to adopt new modes of life calculated and proved to be of greater efficienc}' judged by material results than the old and traditional methods (lla), which have 6 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA the support of sanctions ordinarily classified as religious in reality tradition, nothing else! These are " witting repressions " which assuming the well-known form of the tabu, impose restrictions on human activity sometimes of an absurd nature often of serious economic disadvantage, as when people place a ban on milk, a most valuable form of aliment (lib). All these are the fruits of the reactions, under the dominance of tradition, of man's mental activity with his environment. Let us remember what in a purely mechanistic explana- tion of psychology we might overlook that, after all, " Institutions are the effects not the causes of mental traits/ '(12), and " It was the machinery of the brain which discovered the uses of fire and iron ; found out the elements which compose the earth, sun and stars ; dis- covered the laws which regulate the movements of planets. . . . Nothing is too small and nothing too great to fall within the compass of its machinery " (13). It is mind that matters 'most. I remember that I was shown the war stone at Jftaikel, and was told the tale of the woman who inadvertently and by an accident saw the sacred thing. She died as the result of her imprud- ence. Col. Shakespear tells how "A Lushai named Kela visited Aijal ; on the road he me i a rat which stood up in the tniddle of the road and held its paws to its head. ' What a curious rat/ he said. Two days after he reached his home he died. To see such a rat is certainly ' thianglo.' This incident happened a short time ago ; no one had ever heard of such a rat having been seen before and the unusualness of the occurrence coupled with the death of Kela was, to the Lushais, proof positive of its being the cause of his death " (18a). There are wereleopards and weretigers among the Semas, men and women whose soul passes into a tiger or leopard ; during sleep the soul is the leopard with its full faculties, but the man dies as soon as he hears " that his leopard body has been killed. The son of Yemithi of Lizotomi whose PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 7 leopard body was killed at Sagami, heard the news as he was returning to his village, and expired on the spot for no other reason. A curious example of the power of the Sema mind over the Sema body." (13b) REINCARNATION BELIEFS. It is not enough to assert dogmatically that the lower culture is what it is because it is dominated by tradition. Proof is required, and that proof must show the existence of some social idea or belief which, as the core of all social beliefs and the institutions which represent these beliefs in action, can be regarded as capable of explaining how tradition has assumed the dominance assigned to it. That social idea or belief I find to be the belief in rein- carnation, the belief that society is composed of con- stantly recurring units so that the activities of these units, their relations one with another, their social duties and liabilities, are always regulated by reference to the tradition of the activities, the relations, the duties and liabilities of those deceased members of the social group who are regarded as having returned to the group in their persons. " I am my grandfather, " says thL belief. " Therefore I act and behave in all social contingencies as my grandfather behaved. If in any contingency I am confronted by a novelty, by a combination of cir- cumstances which it would seem had not presented itself to my grandfather, I consult those old men of the group whose knowledge of my grandfather exceeds mine and by their interpretation of the circumstances I am guided to the action which is appropriate to the personality of my grandfather." Such is the line of thought. I shall show how the system of social education in the lower culture is, and can only be, inspired by traditionalism, how the idea of reincarnation, the constant succession of identical units, affects all expressions, simple and complex, of social activity, inspires and explains social structure and is the cardinal ideal of social life. Where ancestor- 8 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA worship makes its appearance, whether as in some measure in descent from the idea of reincarnation or as the result of other factors, it is obviously an element of prepotency in the determination of social values in the direction of tradition. Thus there are ideas still active in shaping] the institutions of the lower culture which derive their strength from, as they lend their support to, social forces of the traditional order and structure. i .- ' The great vehicle of tradition is society. Tradition is society and society is tradition. The human units which compose society change constantly, even rapidly. The changes which society undergoes are slower less perceptible and therefore society appears to be immo- bile changeless but there are limits to social memory, there are variations. The dominance of tradition is the dominance of society over the individual (13a). Therefore it is in group life that its dominance in the lower culture can be best studied. This dominance is, after all, a question of degree, for we are all to some extent under the social law (14). The unit of our study is the group. The strength of group life can be well shown by Indian examples. GROUP SOLIDARITY. We learn from a Settlement Officer, who some years ago investigated the condition of the wretched people who had not been included in the great Reserve where exploitation by the landlord is impossible, that " the Sonthal does not regard himself as a separate unit but as part and parcel of the village community whose head and representative with the outisde world is the Manjhi (15). As he says in a further passage, " It has been remarked by officers experienced in the ways of the Sonthals that the village community is socially the unit amongst the Sonthals, not the individual " (16). Of the Nagas in Manipur, years ago I found that " What gives validity to these unwritten laws is the vague fear that PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA g something may happen if they are broken. Something, this terrible death of a tribesman has happened. Why did it happen ? What more logical than the answer that it happened because a sin has been committed. . . . There is always the disturbing thought that not always nor of necessity does the sinner bear the punishment of his sin and the genna system is strengthened, social solidarity is maintained, by the idea of vicarious punish- ment which makes it the business of each man to see that his neighbour keeps the law" (17). Among the Nagas of the north are found similar social tabus. One is reminded, says Mr. Hutton (17a) of the reason given by some Semas for reaping by hand only, because one man once slashed his stomach and killed himself when reaping with a dao. . . . How easily such a notion may spring up can be gathered from a single instance which came under my notice of a tabu on an Angami. I was going up from Zubza to Kohima with Srisalhu, of Khonoma, when we met a large snake in the road. I started to beat it, but Srisalhu would not join in. When I had killed it, he said that it was kenna for him to kill snakes. The reason was that his home in Khonoma, or rather his father's home, had been inhabited by a snake. When Srisalhu removed to a new site, the snake appeared in the new house. (It might easily be transferred from one building to another in a dhule or paddy or in part of the thatch). It still lives in Srisalhu 's house and is frequently seen, having survived two re- buildings. This fact impressed Srisalhu, who talked it over with the other men of his kindred, who considered that a man who had a snake like that in his house ought not to kill snakes at all. Accordingly it is now regarded as kenna for Srisalhu and his household to kill snakes. If Srisalhu's descendants are prolific, this kenna will doubtless in time affect a whole kindred/' 10 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA LANGUAGES. To turn to another manifestation of social activity, to the means of communication, I may remind you that twenty years ago a great scientific task was carried out by Sir George Grierson, viz., the Linguistic Survey of India. To complete the analysis of the essential char- acteristics of the lower culture I must assay the material yielded by those splendid investigations. Let us not forget that " Le langage a pour premiere condition 1'existence des societes humaines dont il est de son cote rinstrument indispensable et constamment employ^ ; . . . le langage est done eminemment un fait social. En effet 11 entre exactement dans la definition qu'a proposee M. Durkheim ; une langue existe independamment de chacun des individus qui la parlent, et bien qu'elle n'ait aucune realite en dehors de la somme des individus en question, elle est cependant, outre sa generalite, exterieure a chacun d'eux : ce qui le montre, c'est qu'il ne depend d'aucun d'eux de la changer et que toute deviation de Tusage provoque une reaction (18). Lan- guage-sounds, produced and varied and controlled by the will acting on the organs of speech, lips, oral cavity, teeth, tongue, nasal cavity, uvula and throat, organs whose primary use is the ingestion and mastication and preparation of food, involve a convention between speaker and hearer as to the significance of the sounds so formed. II faut parler le meme langage. We may study languages under the aspect of their phonetics, the sounds peculiar to each social group, of their structure, for there is no one sealed pattern. We may analyse their vocabularies, the words or sounds which by social con- vention are attached to specific ideas and things. We cannot overlook their general characters, their power of meeting new ideas with new words or new combinations of familiar words, their power of getting behind the multiplicity of sensation and achieving however par- tially a classification which is abstraction of general PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA n qualities. We know that experts are now busy on the scientific record of the phonetics of the Indian languages, we know that unusual combinations of sounds are to be found in common use in many social groups in India, perhaps vestigial evidence of minute physical differences of the structure of the vocal organs. We learn that there is a great diversity of structure in Indian languages, ranging from a wonderful complexity to monosyllabic simplicity ; that there are many devices, tones, generic determinatives, couplets and combinations, infixes, pre- fixes, suffixes, which Indian social groups employ to eke out the material scanty enough in many cases which tradition has allowed them. They would utter the thoughts that arise and there are no words. There are vocabularies which, like those of the primitive languages of the New World (19), are marked by a number of inde- pendent words each expressing some variation, often minute, of some action, or each expressing a different object which we should describe by a class name (20). They are marked again like the languages of the New World by a strong personalisation which clings to the parts of the body and the members of the social group (21). as shown by the use of pronominal affixes. Whether or not in this phenomenon we may see the influence of the development of individual as opposed to communal possession is a matter for thought and consideration (22).. What is certain is that language preserved by methods of tradition retains the impress of social conditions even when those conditions have ceased and that language is determined by social conditions, reflects them and describes them. MATERIAL CULTURE. In the domain of material culture, which I define as the expression of the social activities in utilising or what is more significant refusing to utilise the properties of the products of their immediate physical environment ; 12 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA I seek the distinctive characteristic of the lower culture in the attitudes taken up in regard to the natural resources on which they are dependent for their means of liveli- hood. There are still groups where agriculture is not practised, where the weapons of the chase are the pro- ducts of nature, stones, sticks, bows whose strings are sinews, where the dominion of nature is almost absolute. But there are many degrees in the lower culture. If a group in its material activities refuses experiment, de- clines the trial of new methods, and is illiberal of natura- lisation towards fresh attitudes, it is in jeopardy of stag- nation, even of retrogression, it must be assigned to the lower culture. Thus we return to the general position that the essential characteristic of the lower culture is the habit of mind which, dominated exclusively by tradition, refers all novel experiences to traditional forms, which adapts introduced rites or customs only by so modifying them that they lose their vigour of novelty and " acquire the primitive or infantile character of the culture which assimilates them " (23) We may at times witness this process of denaturalisation and assimilation, for there some cases where the new idea can be assimilated only by a modification of the structure of the culture into which it has been introduced. These moments of partial assimilation of social indigestion are often disruptive to a far greater extent than we might expect. They mark a stage in progress. Since all cultures, lower as well as higher, have an immense history behind them, we may expect to find in them both sur- vivals, that is to say, organs which still retain their individuality and functions and have therefore achieved some measure of congruity and harmony with the general social organisation, as well as vestigial customs, which we may regard as once active, even essential, but not obsolete and meaningless, which survive (24) solely because they satisfy some aesthetic need or because they are harmless and purely neutral in social value. PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 13 Whether we can ever ascertain the general principles on which assimilation proceeds is hardly probable. Each case has to be considered on its merits. It may be we shall find that in India, as in Australia (24a) " if two races are at a decidedly different level of culture . . . , it is extremely improbable that there would be any amal- gamation on equal terms. The weaker and less cultured would certainly be exterminated by the stronger and more highly cultured/ 1 Contact does not always or of neces- sity involve amalgamation. Imitation, with the limita- tions of differences of speech and of material resources, there has been in plenty, since the prestige of the superior culture leads surely to this. In the process of imitation we may expect to find that much that was vital in the original models has been lost, transformed and meta- morphosed so that the compromise formations which result do not resemble either originals in essentials, in analogy to the results in the human world of marriages across a racial frontier (24b) . That there has been, that there is still, peaceful pene- tration of the lower by the higher culture, is undeniable. But it is also true that there have been violent destruc- tions of social groups of the lower by the higher, of the higher by the lower. Indian history is full of such cases. The conditions requisite for " amalgamation of two cultures on equal terms " cannot be laid down definitely, but there are many facts with which we are not now specifically concerned, to indicate that the effects of the interpenetration of cultures which, by reason of its long history, characterises Indian culture as a whole, are not less manifest in modifications of the social attitudes of the higher culture than in those of the lower culture. METHOD. ' To see life steadily and to see it whole " is no bad maxim for the student of the lower culture, for each custom must be interpreted as part of a whole, in the 14 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA light of the nature of the whole of which it is a part (25). Each custom derives support and validity from all the other customs of the whole, and gives support and validity in its turn to them. Sir Laurence Gomme warned us long years ago that " We must know the exact position of each item before we begin to compare, or we may be comparing absolutely unlike things. Customs and rites which are alike in practice can be shown to have originated from quite different causes, to express quite different motifs and cannot, therefore, be held to belong to a common class" (26). This warning is specially applicable to Indian conditions. Convergence L un- deniable in some cases, such as female infanticide. It is easy to select a fact recorded by a perfectly competent and impartial observer and by neglecting the context to find what is wanted. Qui sait trouver sait chercher. The comparative method in unscientific hands becomes the selective method and is open to the criticism which Sir Laurence Gomme passed on it. The only way is to treat the social life as a psychological unity just as, in the study of the psychology of individuals, the whole man is taken as the unit for investigation. That means we have to ascertain the degree of congruity which any custom belief or institution has with the general mental life of the group and with the whole body of rites, customs and institutions to determine whether it is in organic harmony with them or is a survival, retaining some validity and utility, not altogether out of harmony with the general activities, or is to be classed as vestigial, existing solely because it does no harm, and tolerated so long, and only so long, as it is harmless. Each social group is a different unit. Each group differs from other groups, sometimes by reason of what we are compelled to call racial differ- ences, in other cases by reason of different factors in past history or in present circumstances differences of en- vironment (27). We may seem to be in as difficult a position as the schoolboy when asked to find out the sum PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 15 of three oranges, two apples and five plums on the plea that they are fruit and are all sold at one and the same shop. Fundamentals come first. The elements must be separated out and then only can we constitute our unities. There are elements common to all human groups, high or low, Western or Eastern. All are made up of men and women. All need food. All get their food from the bounty of nature. For the raw material of food, clothing, shelter and implements all depend on natural products. All the mature individuals in a group have passed through a period, which may be very pro- longed, of dependence on others for their sustenance and nurture. Men and women, high and low, by reason of their sex differences, have different functions. The sex division is natural, inevitable, universal. The problems which the conditions of this struggle with and within nature engender are fundamentally identical for us all. But that very fundamental identity is often obscured by the differences in the standpoint from which the problems are viewed at different levels of culture. Therefore in examining and classifying our material, it is permissible to consider how any problem has been or can be stated for and by any social group, how many solutions of such problems are possible for any group with due regard to the mental powers of that group and its technical abilities and its resources as provided by its physical environment. Then we may endeavour to ascertain why any particular solution of a given problem was preferred, what factors decided the preference. Convergence, diffusion by borrowing, independent invention, centralisation round a common core. Such are the theories of origins. It is not an easy task, and no very certain results can be assured, since the complexity of Indian culture is great, even in the lower levels. Le vrai primitif exists nowhere. What we find is a number of groups who rank in material things with very lowly people, who yet have invented systems of religion, complex and ingenious 16 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA systems, so that the intellectual development ranges to the highest fancies of fine philosophy. We shall find our material among the folk that dwell in the jungles and inaccessible hills of the continent, among that welter of tribes who nestle among the hills of Assam and Burma up to the Himalayas, yielding evidence of their lowly culture in the simple and elementary economic organisa- tion, in the characteristics of their speech as well as in the strength and persistence of sentiments which enwrap their lives in a close mantle of custom. Some are timid and feeble folk, remnants it may be of what were once strong tribes. Others are mighty warriors, quick to revenge. All have a long, unwritten history behind them. Few, if indeed any, are in any real sense the original inhabitants of the secluded spots where they now dwell. They may teach us something of the mental development of human society, for among them are preserved in full vitality modes of thought in sharpest contrast with the spirit of science which seeks " by the constant interro- gation of physical and social facts, to penetrate the secret laws which govern them " (28). la. Rivers, Dreams and Primitive Culture, p. 24. 2. Rivers, op. cit., p. 25. 3. Naga Tribes of Manipur, p. 129. 3a. Man, E. H., The Andaman Islanders, pp. 28, 29 3b. Hutton, Sema Nagas, p. 231, 246. 4. Hahn, Einfiihrung in das Gebiet der Kols-Mission, p. 116. 5. Rivers, op. cit. t p. 5. 6. Rivers, Instinct and the Unconscious, p. 230. 7. Rivers, Dreams and Primitive Culture, p. 25. 8. Lang, Anthropological Essays presented to (Sir) E. B. Taylor, p. 211. 9. McDougall, The Group Mind, p. 11, p. 209 sq., cf. Ellen Semple. Influence of Geographical Environment passim. 10. Rivers, Instinct and the Unconscious, p. 18. 11. Rivers, Festskrift Tillagrad Edvard Westermarck. lla. Naga Tribes of Manipur, p. 47. lib. Naga Tribes of Manipur, p. 182. 12. McDougall, op. cit. p. 117. 13. Keith, Engines of the Human Body, p. 235. 13a. The Lushei Kuki Clans, p. 102. 13b. The Sema Nagas, p. 205. 14. Cf. Durkheim, Methode Socielogique, p. 10, passim. PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 17 15. Report on the Condition of the Southals in the Districts of Birbhum, Bankura, Midnapore and Balasore, M. C. McAlpine, I.C.S., p. 13. 16. Ibid., p. 76. 17. Archivfilr Religions-wissenschaft, xii. 456. 17a. Angami Nagas, p. 396. 18. L' Annie Sociologique, vol. ix., p. 1. 19. Payne, History of the New World called America, vol.. ii, p. 103. 20. Linguistic Survey of India, vol. hi., part 1, p. 5 (characteristics of Tibeto- Burman Languages), vol. iv., p. 23 (characteristics of Munda languages). 21. Ibid. 22. See Rivers, History of Melanesian Society, vol. ii., p. 488 sq. 23. Rivers, Dreams and Primitive Culture, p. 24. 24. Haddon, Folklore, xxxi. p. 12. 24a, Sir Baldwin Spencer, Pres. Address Aust. Association, 1921, p. 30. 24b. Sir Arthur Keith, Nationality and Race, p. 9. 25. Methode Sociologique, p. xv. 26. Folklore as an Historical Science, p. 171. 27. McDougall, op. cit., p. 209. 28. Payne, op. cit., vol. i., p. 277. LECTURE II. The Economic Life of the Lower Culture Analysis of Motives, Re- ligious and Other Dominance of Group Life Density and Conditions physical and political affecting density Size of Social Groups Food Quest and Materials Jhum and Terraced Fields Hunting Groups Houses and Villages Dress Firemaking, Stone, Metal and Woodwork, Pottery. I am confronted by certain difficulties in my approach to these studies of the economics of the lower culture. In the first place I shall disappoint the experts in the dismal science if they expect anything very startlingly new or immediately useful as an addition to their know- ledge, because the " natural " mode of existence does not lend itself to any degree of elaborate organisation. In the next place I think it is very difficult and for me impossible to analyse the life of these communities as I know and regard them, into separate and distinct com- partments. The play of purely economic forces is so closely intertwined with social forces of what we are in the habit of treating as a different order, that the whole must be regarded as a whole, not as a mechanical com- bination of so many independent parts. That considera- tions of an economic order do play a real even a large part in determining the behaviour of these societies of the lower culture, cannot be denied, and yet such is the power of tradition that the activity of economic forces is obscured and coloured often when most discernible, by the dominance of sentiments which a modern analytic mind would describe as religious. Then we come to the third of my difficulties, that arises from the notable fact that we are dealing with communities, not with indivi- duals, so that whatever may be the verdict of the specialist in the controversy as to the nature, origin and function of the group mind, we are dealing with groups PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 19 possessed of no inconsiderable social organisation and structure with a high degree of mental homogeneity, with relatively small spatial extent and therefore enabled to practise collective deliberation and to display collective volition in intense forms. It will be evident that to define the lower culture exclusively on psychological grounds as under the thraldom of tradition would now enable me to include many groups in my survey which I therefore propose to limit by adding thereto an economic element derived from their relations to other communities, for the special reason that we have in India an economic organisation of social units which is based on a definite scale of precedence according to economic occupation, such that, though at any one moment it may appear immobile and rigid, yet on a wide view it appears to possess a degree of elasticity and local variation, according to differences of economic pressure. The groups of the lower culture stand with but few exceptions apart from this organisation which is the Hindu polity. Therefore economic independence of this polity, which varies in degrees as we shall see, and in respect to certain specified commodities, may be taken as a distinguishing feature of the lower culture. It will therefore serve our purpose if we investigate the lower culture and its economics by examining typical cases as to their food supplies and the methods of pre- paring them, as to the materials and methods used in the preparation of shelter from the weather, and the clothes they wear, to observe whence and how they obtain, and how they work, metals, with special note of instances where by reason of the development of natural resources special local industries have sprung into being, which necessitate some albeit rudimentary organisation for transport and distribution. Attention must be given to the size of the groups classified as belonging to the lower culture, in order to ascertain whether and how far we " accept the general 20 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA principle that, on the whole aid in the long run during the earlier stages of human evolution, the complexity and coherence of the social order follow upon the size of the group ; which, since its size in turn follows upon the mode of the economic life, may be described as the food-group " (1). DENSITY. Analysis of the facts recorded at the 1911 census (2) shows that one-eleventh of the population is supported by two-fifths of the total area of the Indian Empire ; that one-eleventh of the total area supports one-third of the population ; that the density ranges from one per square mile in Chagai in Baluchistan to nearly 2,000 per square mile in part of the Dacca district ; that density of population in India is dependent on the sum total of agricultural conditions in which are to be included the area under cultivation, rainfall, physical configuration, while the effect of variations consequent on the nature of the soil is difficult if not impossible of distinction and separation from the general mass of agricultural pheno- mena. (3) The complexity of these phenomena is in- creased by the obvious fact that the conditions prior to, as well as those which are directly attributable to the " Pax Britannica," exercise an effect on the social life in this aspect of the 300 millions of human beings then enumer- ated. There is evidence which leads to the conclusion that as minute investigations showed was the case in Bihar in 1901, the tracts which can support most people are those where rice is grown (4) . As I see the question, it may be put thus what is the density of population which (subject to any special exceptions) can be fairly regarded as an indication of conditions, social, physical and historical, unfavourable to the development of economic organisation to a stage distinctly higher than that of the simple tribal form ? Is a density of 50 per square mile too high when the average all over India is taken as 175 per square mile ? Is a density of 25 per PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 21 square mile unfairly low ? The Hills Division of Assam has 34 to the square mile, but in the Lushai Hills we drop to 13 per square mile. In Baluchistan, a land of contra- dictions and contrasts, we get to six per square mile. In parts of Chota Nagpur we have 38 to the square mile, and in Burma as a result of the great dissimilarities of surface conditions, of recent political conditions and of the characters of the inhabitants, there are areas with only 15 to the square mile ; others with 38 and with 23, despite certain advantages which are nullified by the physical conditions, and areas where the population is over 120 to the square mile. Parts of the Central Pro- vinces are but sparsely populated, and in the view of those who know the country the determining factor is to be found in the physical characteristics of the country and in its past history. In Madras there are but few areas which fall below the general average. The Agency tracts in the north, physically conterminous with the Chota Nagpur area, consist of forest-clad ranges, inhabited by improvident and ignorant aboriginal tribes such as the Khond, "a short, thick-set good-humoured jungle man. He lives in a cabin built of rough hewn planks, has a predilection for toddy and an aversion for education : generally speaks the truth, worships singularly unpleasant devils in a strangely unpleasant manner, and in his worldly affairs exhibits a deplorable but eminently cheerful disregard for the morrow " (5). When we touch on the hills, wherein abide the Todas (6) worshippers of the sacred dairy and its buffaloes, the Badagas, the Kurumbas the Irulas and the Kotas,(7) we come again on an area where the population is relatively sparse, and exhibits features which enable it to be assigned to the lower culture. Still further south the high ranges in the Devikulam Taluk of the prosperous State of Travan- core (7), which seem once to have been held by a people of relatively high culture, are now inhabited by wandering folk, as is demonstrated by the low density of 55 per square mile. 22 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA iP SIZE OF SOCIA^ GROUPS. ^ More significant, especially when regarded in associa- tion with the general distribution of culture, is the size of the social groups. We have seen groups as small as those of the Khereya, who move from jiiJ^Ie to jungle not more than one or two families at a time (8). The Birhors wander about in small groups of from two to about ten families, stop and hunt in one place for about a week or a fortnigl^ and then move on to another jungle until they come back to their original starting point " (9). The Irulas in South Arcot " dwell in scattered huts never more than two or three in one place which are little round thatched hovels with a low doorway through which one can just crawl, built among the fields " (10). The Kadirs of Cochin live in groups of from ten to fifteen or twenty huts, usually built of bamboo, close to water, or in an open glade of the forest. These settlements are rarely permanent, .yet " it is wonderful to see the ingenuity of these people whose wants are few and whose life is very simple. Their requirements are, in fact, satisfied with the materials available in the vicinity of their abodes " (11). We cannot hesitate to classify these people as belonging to the lower culture. A further stage of social and economic development has been reached by the tribes inhabiting the hills of Assam. There are large villages with 5,000 or 6,000 inhabitants, yet there are also tiny settlements in the jungles of from four to five huts, built with ingenuity and skill of bamboo and cane, in which dwell Kukis, nomad agriculturists. " The peculiar vagabond strain/' says Colonel Shakespear, " in the blood of the Kuki Lushei race, if not controlled, leads to villages splitting into hamlets and hamlets subdividing till in the Manipur Hills we find single houses in the midst of dense jungle, several miles from the next habitation". (12). The Pax Britannica has removed the need of forming large communities for the purposes of defence. PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 23 Not only have we to take count of the dominance of the bamboo, but some weight must also be assigned in our explanation of the " peculiar vagabond strain " of the Kuki Lushei race to the custom by which " % Each son of a chief, as he attained a marriageable age, was* provided with a wife at his father's expense and give* a certain number o| households from his father's village and sent forth to a" tillage of his own. Henceforth he* ruled as an independent chief and his success or failure depended on -his own talents for^ling. He paid no tribute to his father, but was expected to help him in his quarrels with neighbouring chiefs, but when fathers lived long, it was not unusual to find their sons disowning even this amount of subordination. The youngest son remained in his father's village and succeeded not only to the village but also to all the property " (13). There are traces of this custom which still lingers among us under the name of Borough English, in the more settled com- munities of the Hills, and one large Naga group, the Semas, contrary to the usual Naga order, has hereditary chiefs, " the elder sons becoming chiefs in their own villages during the fathers' lifetime, provided the sons are able to found separate villages, and one of the younger sons probably succeeding in his father's village " (14). Economic conditions engender social habits which persist as customs long after the original conditions have been modified or ceased to affect them actively. The effect of political conditions upon the social life is especially marked here. In 1911 it was observed that " The decrease in the size of villages had led to an important modification of the custom under which the youngest son inherits his father's village and property. The raison d'etre of this system of inheritance is that elder sons established villages of their own on their marriage. In order to enable them to do so a certain number of headmen or Upas and also of the common people were told off to accompany the young chief and 24 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA form the nucleus of his new village. When all the elder sons had been established in this way, it is not unnatural that the youngest should inherit his father's village and property, and on him rested the responsibility for his mother's support, But while there has been no tendency for chiefs' families to decrease, the average size of villages has been decreased by half, and there are not enough houses to go round among the sons. Indeed, in some cases none of the sons have been able to start a separate village, and it is obvious that under these circumstances inheritance should pass to the eldest son and this change has been readily accepted by the people " (15). FOOD-QUEST. It is no far cry from the teeming streets of Calcutta to the jungles of Bankura, wherein dwell the Khereyas, whose mode of life is simplicity itself. They make very small huts with the branches of trees thatching them with leaves and using creepers as ropes. They lie down on the bare ground and never use coat or wrapper even in winter. Their most favourite and common food is the boiled roots of creepers, with rice once a day when available. Fire they know and make by friction. Only one or two families live in one jungle, and when the family grows some of them remove to a new jungle. Yet their women are skilful in making very fine mattresses which they sell, but never use ; they know how to sharpen their digging shovels by fire, and work simple leaf bellows (16). Rai Bahadur Sarat Chandra Roy, to whom the science of Indian anthropology owes a great debt, tells us of the Birhors, a jungle folk of Hazaribagh, who have made no progress in fifty years, or none since the days of that great pioneer, Colonel Dalton. They still wander through the jungles in quest of food in small groups of from three to ten families, live in mere impro- vised leaf sheds and subsist on yams, honey, tubers of various kinds, and on the varied produce of the mahua PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 25 tree. Some settle down, but slender and weak are the ties which fasten them to agriculture. Some revert to the wandering life in the jungle from sheer ennui, others take easy fright and at the slightest ill-treatment, real or fancied, fall back to their old nomad life. Where they do cultivate, it is by burning the jungle, scratching the soil and sowing beans and maize (17). From the same gifted inquirer we learn of the Pahiras, a folk who have now adopted a patois of Bengali as their language, that even to this day most Pahiras have to depend mainly on yams and edible roots and fruits and the corolla of the mahua (Bassia latifolia) which their women gather in the jungles, with some variety from the humble gains of the chase and occasional fishing. To such insects and grubs come not amiss. Simple as is their dress at its best, there are still those who have to wear creeper bark, and there are current traditions of the days not so distant when all wore leaf or bark cloths (18). The bounty of the jungle provides sustenance for the dark-skinned, broad-nosed, short-statured inhabitants of the hills from the Nallamalai range to the Niligiris and on to the hills of Travancore State to Cape Comorin. In them, beyond a doubt, we have specimens of a race which we may call pre-Dravidian, and so avoid any attempt at assigning these interesting peoples to any family of races. Set in the path of the monsoon and clothed with dense and lofty forests which generally are filled with evergreen trees covered all over with climbers diversified with patches of deciduous forest, the Andaman Islands are inhabited by a short-statured folk, whose smooth, greasy, satiny skin is an intense black in colour, like a black-leaded stove, whose hair, sooty-black or yellowish-brown in general appearance, grows in small rings on the head, which give it the appearance of growing in tufts. Such is the variety of the yield of forest and sea, whose harvest is never done, that though habitually 26 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA heavy eaters, they never starve, since they find susten- ance in fish, pork, turtle, iguana, wild cat, shellfish, larvae and fruit seeds, roots and honey. Yet when we first went there they did not know how to make fire and showed much skill in so carrying smouldering logs with them by land or sea that they were not extinguished (19). In the settled historic South, where Government recognises the rights of the forest tribes to collect and live by the produce of the forests, there are yet folk like the Irulas, whose dietary consists of " roots, wild fruits and honey/' which they gather by " letting themselves down the face of the cliffs at night by ladders made of twisted creepers, who (20) always reject cooked rice, even when gratuitously offered/ 1 But little above them are the Chenchus (21), in the hills of the Kurnool and Nellore districts, the Kadirs (22) of the Animalai hills who like the Veda Malars of Travancore file their teeth, whose women distend the lobes of their ears by massive ear- rings. When a Kadir collects wild honey, he will only do so while his wife or son watches above to prevent any foul play. They have a superstition that they should always return by the way they go down and decline to get to the bottom of the cliff, although the distance may be less and the work of reclimbing avoided. Mr. (now Sir) J. D. Rees, describing the collection of honey by the Kadirs of the southern hills, says that they " descend giddy precipices at night, torch in hand, to smoke out the bees and take away the honey. A stout creeper is sus- pended over the abyss, and it is established law of the jungle that no brother shall assist in holding it " (23). How, when, where, and in what circumstances agri- culture had its origin, are questions on which I fear I can throw no light. As I see it, agriculture in the lower culture is not a simple business. It is a complex of many elements, sacrifices, tabus, dances, as well as sowing and weeding. It is the association of these elements, not any single element in the complex, that for the lower PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 27 culture produces the results. Hence, as it seems to me, we must look for origins in the complex association of the various component elements, the human sacrifice, since we have folk like the Was (24) and Nagas (25) or the Khonds (26) who needed or thought they needed to begin the cultivation with the death of some human being, tabus of a long and oppressive nature, since to the Naga all minor activities are forbidden while the seed is in the soil and the harvest uncut (27), A step towards better conditions in the food quest was taken when the simple form of jhum cultivation was introduced : " A tract is cleared by fire, cultivated for a year or two and then abandoned for another tract, where a like process is pursued. Known as Jhum on the North-East Frontier. This is the Kumari of South- West India, the Toungyan of Burma, the dahya of North India. Ponam, or ponacaud of Malabar. In the Philippine Islands it is known as guinges ; it is practised in the Ardennes under the name of sartage and in Sweden under the name of swedjande " (28). It is described by the historian of the New World called America as " the primitive mode of agriculture all over the world and widely practised even yet where virgin forest is abundant, for in such circumstances it is the most economical method becauses it promises the largest net return" (29). Alongside of it, in many areas supplementing it, supplanting it, and independent of it, is the system of terraced fields, which are found in Europe, in England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, (30) as well as in Arabia (31) and America (32). In Manipur, indeed, in one small area, we have " tribes who migrate periodically and practise only the jhum system of cultivation. We have tribes such as the Kabuis (and possibly the Marrings) who keep to the village sites with tenacity, but are compelled to change the area of their cultivation year by year in set rotation. They preserve the memory of other days by taking omens annually to decide the a8 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA direction in which the cultivation is to be. We have large villages with extensive terraced fields magnificently irrigated with water brought from considerable distances in channels so well aligned that every advantage is taken of any natural slope encountered and awkward corners avoided or turned with admirable ingenuity. But this method of cultivation is not practicable everywhere, and fortunate are the tribes who occupy hills whose declivity is not too steep for such fields. By means of long and assiduous labour a field can be built up and provided with water so that large terraces represent the expendi- ture of a vast amount of energy and farming ability as well as much practical engineering skill." I have ob- served, too, that " when felling the jungle for the jhums it is usual to leave one tree in the middle of the field as a refuge for the tree spirit. Indeed, the scorched, scarred, twisted horror of some of these solitary stumps is enough to account for the belief that some spirit has chosen them as an abode. It is interesting to note the skill with which advantage is taken of the tree logs to employ them as retaining walls to keep the moisture in the ground thus making use of the principle of the terraced field in places where terraced fields are impossible on a large scale." Colonel McCulloch remarks that " Across the fields in parallel lines at no great distance apart they lay the unconsumed trunks of the trees ; these serve as dams to rains and preventives to the soil being carried away with it. In bamboo jungle the bamboo stumps serve the same purpose " (33). In the Khasia Hills " Forest lands are cleared by the process known as j burning, the trees being felled early in the winter and allowed to lie till January or February when fire is applied, logs of wood being placed at intervals of a few feet to prevent, as far as possible, the ashes being blown away by the wind " (34). Exceptional interest attaches to this ingenious method of building up or scarping out the hillside to form terraced fields since they are found all over the world in frequent but PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 29 not universal association with cultural features such as the erection of stone monuments, sun worship, and the search for wealth, as discussed at length and in careful exposition by Mr. Perry (35). Clearly this is a world problem, and local explanations are of little value. Negative as well as positive evidence has yet to be dis- cussed and its meaning evaluated. The real significance of the frequent but not universal association of jhum cultivation with terraced fields has to be explained. So far as Assam is concerned we now know that people like the Semas, when urged by the Administration to follow the terrace system stated that " they were unable to do so as they did not know the sacrifices for terrace cultivation " (36). The plough is never used ; yet in Manipur they see it in use. Here we have a light thrown suddenly on the minds of the lower culture. Unless the ritual proper to terraced fields is known, it is useless to make the experiment. The sacrifice is part, an integral essential part of the process. When the stars in their courses fight for the old order, not much that is new can be introduced. From the Sema country comes the information that " The heavy rain in 1918, which ruined the millet crop, was put down in Shevekhe village to the irrigation channels dug by a pestilential innovator who wanted to make terraced fields instead of jhuming them like his forebears. The wrathful villagers broke them up " (37). The village Tory muttered " I told you so." I may compare and contrast this recent evidence from the Naga Hills with an experience which I had in a Tangkhul Naga village in Manipur, where I saw a girl whom I had seen the year before in her native village where she was reputed to be a most skilful weaver of cloth. I asked her if she made any cloths of late, and was told that the new village into which she had married in the interval, would not let her make cloths. I asked the village headman why this useful craft was forbidden, and was told that they feared that if they let her do work 30 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA which was right and proper in the village of her birth, they would draw down on them the magic of the other village. Infringement of the patent meant trouble somehow. While we may admire the skill and ingenuity of people in the lower culture who build up these wonder- ful terraced fields, we may ask ourselves whether they understand the process of germination as we do. They have not been brought up on the Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians, which might make this mystery as clear to them as it makes other mysteries clear to us. May we regard their position as this ? " We have sown the seed, we have killed the fowls, as is right. In the old days we should have carried a human head round the fields. We have danced the dances, observed the prescribed tabus, gone through the whole ritual as ordained by custom, that is as it was performed by our ancestors who live again in our bodies. Because we have done all these things duly and in order, because each item of the long ritual is, or appears to be, as necessary as any other item in the complex of associated rites, because no item can be omitted, therefore we get the harvest, sometimes tenfold, sometimes fivefold, and sometimes we get no harvest at all." If to this argument the suggestion were made that experiment might be made to see whether any item could be safely left out or modified, the answer would be obvious " Why worry when the known recognised, approved, established methods give all the results desired ? Why run the risk of failure ? Why run the risk of the magic of the other people whose secret we are asked to imitate ? Yet they use matches when they can get them because, as I presume, matches have the prestige of an admittedly superior culture behind them. What comes from people whom they know and regard as at best their equals, more often as their inferiors, has no prestige, is not imitated. What comes to them from a strange culture, regarded as superior and to be imitated, may have prestige partly because it comes from a superior PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 31 culture or even because it comes from a culture recognised as different to their own. The reasons why this custom is chosen for imitation and that rejected can seldom be ascertained exactly and definitely. The lower culture is what it is because it imposes these restrictions upon itself, because it is illiberal of naturalisation of new ideas, because it is ruled by custom. Nor are the conquests won by trouble and difficulty always retained. The force of ancient custom may be too strong, as the Government of India found when trying to cure criminal tribes like the Maghaya Doms (38) by settling them in agricultural communities. The Dom is still a nomad. The settlements, we learn, served as houses for the Women and children, but the men were seldom to be found in them. The Baigas were forbidden to practise the ancient jhum method of cultivation and " attempts made to train them to regular cultivation ... in some villages the Baiga cultivators, if left unwatched, would dig up the grain which they themselves had sown as seed in their fields and eat it " (39). Agriculture is not in the lower culture a simple business. Sacrifices have to be offered up, ritual of a long and complex nature has to be performed. All the items are important. None may be omitted. It is a complex of many factors, each of which has validity. Therefore its origins must be sought in a complex of ideas which exhibits the growth and history of the association of the several elements we now perceive in combination. Conditions in India, as far as the typical practices of the lower culture are concerned, do not now afford us much help in our quest for origins. In earlier days, no doubt, there were many folk, like the Chenchus who lived in caves ; even now, here and there, are those who use caves as places of temporary habitation (40). In general, the people use and con- struct habitations which are of various degrees of sim- plicity. The Yanadis, who inhabit the Telugu area, a 32 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA dark-skinned broad-nosed people, " live in low conical huts rudely built of bamboo and palmyra leaves, grass or millet stalks, with a small entrance, through which grown up people have to creep (41). In a tanda or settlement of the migratory Birhors the huts are mere improvised leaf- sheds in the form of low triangular kurnbas or straw shelters such as their neighbours the Mundas and the Oraons erect near their rice fields. Each family erects its separate shed or sheds made of branches and leaves. Each of these sheds has one opening, sometimes provided with a door made of branches and leaves (42). Why build more elaborately when in a week or so there will be a move on to another jungle ? When we come to the mountain ranges of Assam, where as we have seen there are in these days tiny hamlets or even solitary huts in the midst of jungle as there are also large well-built villages, there is still a measure of simplicity discernible in the range of material as well as in the methods of con- struction. In the Naga villages are solid houses with plank walls and roofs of heavy thatch. In the jungle the nomad Kuki builds lightly and a habitation of sorts can be erected in a few hours with bamboo mats as walls and with leaves to thatch and keep out the rain. The relaxation of the pressure which kept instinctive nomads like the Lusheis together, has, as we have noted, allowed freer play to the tendency to dispersion, and with that goes a diminution of the architectural skill. The con- struction of the large solidly-built houses involves co- operation, provision of material as well as technical skill. Hence there may be a lessening of these valuable qualities as a result of the weakening of the bonds which drove these people to form large units. Intensity of social life seems to go with increase in the size of the social unit and then to diminish by a sort of decreasing return due, perhaps, to difficulties of main- taining communications throughout the unit. Diminu- tion of external pressure may also promote disintegration. PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 33 One feature of the domestic architecture of the lower culture will require attention, not from its interest as evincing skill in the use of material, but as the most important means of preserving social life. Among the Andamanese (43), among groups such as the Nagas, Lushais, Munda-speaking people of Chota Nagpur, Dravidian tribes of Southern and Central India, Gonds, Khonds, Kurumbas, and in many parts of the world, is found the institution of the Bachelors' Hall where the young men of the community sleep and live. It is often more pretentious* architecturally than private dwelling places, and from that point of view, notable. Its absence in the case of small jungle tribes is an indica- tion of the development of their resources, material as well as mental. Nomadism affords no possibility of the development of an institution such as this, and their circumstances compel them to Nomadism. DRESS. Such folk as the Andamanese exhibit local variations in the matter of dress, for while Jarawas go naked, others wear a bunch of leaves, or a loose tassel of narrow strips of bark, or a bunching tassel of fibre (44). " No clothing as we understand the word, is worn by either sex ; there are, however, certain so-called ornamental circlets, garters, bracelets, cinctures, and necklaces of bones, wood, or shell, which are its substitute and serve to remove in some measure the impression that they are naked ; these appendages are not worn as symbols of rank or (if we except the ro-gun) of status, and their manufacture devolves always on the females of the community " (45). Absence of clothing as a means of protection against the climate may be intelligible enough in these Islands, where the lowest temperature recorded is 63 and the mean temperature is not less than 70. But in the hills of Assam climatic conditions are different, yet even now (46) there are naked folk. With them as with others 34 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA (47) a cloth is worn when there are strangers about. As typical of the level which has been classified as the figleaf state of society, there are, as Thurston remarks (48) some tribes in Southern India who have only recently advanced beyond that state. There are others who are still to be found in that state. The Thanda Pulayans, of Cochin (49) are so called from the thanda garment worn by their females. Thanda is a waterplant (isolepis articulata Nees) the leaves of which are cut into lengths of 2 feet, woven at one end and tied round their waist in such a manner that the strings unwoven hang loosely round the loins up to the knees/' Colonel Dalton records with sombre humour how the Juang girls sat silent in his tent while he discussed customs and religion with the men of the party, till, to his horror, he saw the ladies who " sat nestled in a corner . . . were dropping great tears . . . like dew-drops on the green leaves. Tenderly seeking the cause of their distress he learned that the leaves of their attire were becoming dry, stiff and uncomfortable, and if they were not allowed to go to the woods for a change, the consequences would be serious/' (50). The adoption of cloth by the Juangs was brought about by the persuasive power of Captain, afterwards Major-General Sir James Johnstone, whose Experiences in Manipur and the Naga Hills form an interesting volume. Among the Padam Abors, on the banks of the Dibong River " All females with pretensions to youth wear suspended in front from a string round the loins a row of from three to a dozen shell-shaped embossed plates of bell metal from about six to three inches in diameter, the largest in the middle, the others gradually diminishing in size as they approach the hips. These plates rattle and chink as they move like prisoners' chains. Very young girls except for warmth wear nothing but these appendages but the smallest of the sex is never seen without them, and even adult females are often seen with no other covering " (51). The PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 35 Ghyghasi-Miris, a poor, meanly-clad, badly-fed, ill-looking people of stunted growth, living in small villages of ten or a dozen houses, built closely together in some position difficult of access, deem their women dressed when wearing only a small petticoat made of filaments of cane woven together, about a foot in breadth and fastened tightly round the loins (52.) From the sancta simplicitas of " dress " of this kind I turn to the elaborate costume of an Angami warrior, whose prowess in war and in love, whose status in society can be determined accurately by the distinctions of his dress distinctions as important to him as the " Third pip " to some of us a few years ago. Kilt and tail and cloth and sporran, if I may call it so, are not left to in- dividual choice. Each has a social value, a meaning and a significance (53). FIRE-MAKING. That curious creature, Neanderthal man whose massive brows, receding chin, big brain, thick neck, loose-limbed with an easy, shuffling gait, make him still an interesting study from the history of the physical evolution of mankind was skilled as a flint- worker, " had fire at his command and buried his dead " (54). Thus as far back as the mid-Pleistocene Age, there was in the world a race of human beings using fire. I know of no tribe which is completely ignorant of fire. (55). The Andamanese "like the quondam aborigines of Tasmania have always been ignorant of the art of producing fire, they naturally display much care and skill in the measures they adopt for avoiding such incon- venience as might be caused by the extinction of their fires. When they all leave an encampment with the intention of returning in a few days, besides taking with them one or more smouldering logs wrapped in leaves if the weather be wet, they place a large burning log or faggot in some sheltered spot where, owing to the character and condition of the wood invariably selected, 36 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA it smoulders for several days, and can be rekindled when required " (56). The production of fire by friction is still practised in two forms by many peoples in India. Indeed, the most sacred fire of Brahmanic Hinduism, the Homa, is produced by this means (57). " In making fire by friction, the Kotas of the Nilgiris employ three forms of apparatus : (1) a vertical and horizontal stick with sockets and grooves, both made of twigs of Rhodo- myrtus tomentosus ; (2) a small piece of the root of Salix tetrasperma is spliced into a stick, which is rotated in a socket in a piece of the root of the same tree ; (3) a small piece of the root of this tree made tapering at each end with a knife or fragment of bottle glass, is firmly fixed in the wooden handle of a drill. A shallow cavity and groove are made in a block of the same wood, and a few crystalline particles from the ground are dropped into the cavity" (58). The sawing method is employed by such people as the Paniyans and Vizagapatam hillmen, who take a piece of dry bamboo, split lengthways, and make a notch in the convex side. A knife edge is then cut on a piece of tamarind wood, shaped to fit the notch. A piece of cloth is laid below the notched bamboo, across which, in the notch, the tamarind wood is drawn violently till dust drops on to the cloth below, till smoke, and finally flame, appears in the cloth (59). The flint and steel are used by the Kadirs (60) and the Irulas (61). It is recorded that " though the Badagas make fire by friction, reference is made in their folk legends, not to this mode of obtaining fire, but to chakkamukhi (flint and steel), which is repeatedly referred to in connection with cremation " (62). Are we to suspect that the use of flint and steel has been superseded by the frictional method, except in the solemnity of funeral rites, pre- served there by reason of its associations ? Iron, we know from the same authority (63), is carried by the son or representative of the deceased as having a " repulsive power over the spirits that hover about the dead/' It PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 37 may be that iron, a new, strange, powerful material is used for its novelty, just as with the Lusheis the hunter who kills a rhinoceros can escape the penalty of his success by going to the forge while the corpse of a man who has died by accident or by wild animals, if brought into the village at all, which is forbidden in some cases, is " deposited in the forge " (64). Among the Semas it is also advisable to sit on a dao because iron breaks all gennas, the evil effect of the forbidden act being neutralised by the iron of the dao (65). Perhaps the most interesting method of firemaking is that by means of the fire piston whose use " extends sporadically over a wide area, from Northern Burma and Siam through the Malay Peninsula and the Malayan Archipelago to its eastern limits in the islands of Luzon and Mindanao in the Philippines " (66). As Sir Edward Tylor observed (67) " There is a well-known scientific toy made to show that heat is generated by compression of air. It consists of a brass tube closed at one end into which a packed piston is sharply forced down, thus igniting a piece of tinder within the tube. It is curious to find an apparatus on this principle (made in ivory, hard wood, etc.) used as a practical means of making fire in Burmah, and even among the Malays." Mr. Henry Balf our, in summarising the evidence, shows that the fire piston was discovered in France in 1802, that it was patented in England in 1807, and was sold in a pocket form by tobacconists in Paris. As he remarks, " The problem is to ascertain whether this peculiar and very specialised method of fire-production was introduced into the oriental regions from Europe, or whether it was invented independently by the little civilized peoples among whom it is found as an appliance of practical everyday use " (68). No very definite conclusion is formulated, perhaps ex abundanti cautela, though in answer to the objection that " It seems almost incredible that so delicate and far from obvious a method can have been 38 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA discovered whether by accident or by gradual develop- ment by any of the eastern peoples amongst whom it has been found in use " our authority recognises that " There is no inherent impossibility in such a double origin, cases of independent invention of similar appliances in widely separated regions having frequently arisen, and " there is no record of introduction by Europeans " (69). The impossibilities of yesterday are the certainties of to- morrow, and while, beyond a doubt, there has been much transmission of culture, without which it is impossible to explain the complexity of existing cultures, I myself am convinced that the extreme advocates of the " trans- mission of culture " tend to overstrain a good case, laying down, as a law without exceptions that in no case be the merits or the circumstances ever so clear may we admit the possibility of independent origins, of convergence or even of singular solutions. In the lower, as in the higher culture, the raw materials used by man in satisfaction of his various needs are the products of either the animal or the vegetable or the mineral kingdom. They may be used in the condition in which they are found. They may be used after being subjected to processes controlled by man which range in order of complexity from the application of fire (involving a knowledge of means of making fire) to the combination of long complicated chemical processes in the course of which use is made of methods and knowledge derived from many often very distinct sources. These methods, this knowledge, can be traced back in many cases and dated, chronologically. Even the simple processes the direct processes involve a knowledge which is not immediately given, but can be won only by observation, of the properties of the materials yielded by these three sources. I believe that " In the early stages of culture progress, the stones employed as implements and in the manufacture of implements and other articles, as well also as building stone, were gathered PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 39 at random wherever they happened to be found on the surface of the ground " (70). The practices of living races may give evidence of the methods and processes employed in the past, as, for instance, that just as in the lower culture men bury food with their dead, because they think the spirit of the dead will need food, so in the distant Palaeolithic age when men buried food with their dead, it was because in those remote days they too believed that the dead man had a spirit, and that it needed and could get benefit from food. I will not now discuss the assumptions which underlie this attitude. In dealing with cultural data it is possible to classify the facts according to the degree of elaboration to which knowledge based on and derived from observation, is used in pro- ducing which is needed and desired, from the raw materials as found in nature. The Andamanese use cyrena shells and quartz flakes as cutting instruments and " the more distant tribes still retain the use with scarcely any modification of most of the stone and other implements which served their ancestors " (71) but " maintain that they never, even when iron was scarce, made arrowheads, axes, or adzes or chisels, of stone " (72). They are now aware of the superiority of iron over stone and work pieces of hoop- iron, keel-plate, etc., cold, without application of heat, by simple hammering and grindery on stone anvils and whetstones, with stone hammers, by the processes which were, and are, used to make stone implements. In many parts of the peninsula stone implements are occasionally found, and are commonly regarded as thunderbolts and as endowed with magical qualities (73). Copper imple- ments have been found in the Central Provinces, the Gangetic Valley, and in Burma, where both they and stone weapons are said to be thunderbolts. (75). Such tribes as the Semas use regularly a hoe " made of a piece of pliant wood or bamboo bent into the form of a horseshoe, with the ends prolonged to cross one another, which Mr. 40 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA Hutton considers may be the prototypes of iron hoes of the same shape used by some of the Lhotas and many of the Ao and Konyaks (74). The truth is that wooden as well as stone implements are used largely by tribes who use iron implements and know how to use fire to work iron. From elsewhere, from America (75a) comes the proof of the extraordinary culture in matters of technique that may be reached by people ignorant of metal tools and examination of the products of the lower culture in any good museum will reveal the excellence of the products of what not unfairly may be called the wooden age as distinct from the stone age. When Colonel Dalton made the acquaintance of the Juangs, he found them with " no knowledge whatever of metals. They have no iron smiths nor smelters of iron. They have no word in their own language for iron or other metals. They neither spin nor weave nor have they ever attained to the simplest knowledge of pottery." (76) In the vocabularies collected for the Linguistic Survey of India the word for iron in Juang is given as luha, a Hindu loan word (77). Yet it is symptomatic of Indian economic policy that iron workers are low down in the scale of precedence because " The iron industry is associated with the primitive tribes who furnished the whole of the metal prior to its importation from Europe " (78). Formerly a flourishing industry it has now sadly diminished, as in the Khasi Hills, owing partly to the competition of iron from England and partly to the denudation of the country of its timber so that charcoal can no longer be made (79). In the Chota Nagpur area in the case of the less advanced groups such as the Kharias the blacksmith is a member of the group, as he is among the Nagas and Lusheis. In larger communities such as the Mundas and Oraons, he is a village official and an outsider. The supplies of the metal (63) (generally in the shape of roughly-worked hoes) are obtained from sources outside. By this dependence PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 41 on outside supplies some of these backward people come into contact with representatives of superior culture. Iron-smelting demands means to get the high tempera- ture necessary, of devices for tempering and annealing the tools fashioned, and in some cases a knowledge of fluxes and reduction-agents, so that even though, as with the Angamis, the tools actually used by the blacksmith are stones, for anvils and hammers, split bamboos used as tongs and the double piston bellows, made of bamboo tubes and skin packing, the practical knowledge of metal working processes has reached a fair level (80). The Andamanese make pots from a particular kind of clay, found only in a few places, where the work is carried on. Strips of kneaded clay from which all stones have been removed, are made by the fingers and palms. The cup-like base, round or sometimes pointed, is first shaped and then the pot is built up, one roll after another being added and pressed to the desired thinness. The vessel is scraped inside and out by a cyrena shell, and wavy, checked or striped designs engraved by means of a pointed stick. It is then placed in the sun or before a fire to dry, and care taken to harden all parts equally. It is then baked by placing burning pieces of wood both inside and around the vessel. The pots so made are of three sizes, the largest seen only in permanent encampments, a medium size which is almost invariably provided with a rough basket work casing, and a small size useful when occasion for a migration as for a death (81). I have seen pots made in circular form by a simple use of the bamboo as a core. ' The clay is slightly damped and then rolled out on a board which is first powdered with fine grit to prevent the clay from adhering too closely. It is then coiled round a bamboo stem and the base of the vessel cut out. At first the shape is that of a plain cylinder. It is then moulded by hand into the curves required, and after a partial hardening in the sun is baked in a furnace outside the village. They make vessels 42 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA of all sizes. These vessels are devoid of any but the simplest ornamentation" (82). Among the Angamis, " pots are only made in certain villages . . . where clay is available. They are modelled from the lump by hand, without the aid of any wheel or implements, roughly round, with a somewhat greater circumference near the base than at the mouth, the lip of which is turned out- wards "(83). Among the Lusheis (84) as with the Semas and other Naga tribes (85) only women make pots. Wooden vessels, platters, cups, bamboo cylinders, buffalo horns, gourds, leaves, are used in the storage, preparation and consumption of food, and are all articles made from raw materials furnished by the immediate environment. These localised and specialised industries such as pot- making, salt working, have a special economic importance since from these centres springs up trade by barter, with the subsequent development of special groups for the transportation to markets and distribution there of these products. It was to procure iron that the Jarawas made their long series of raids on the outlying parts of the Andaman settlement (86). It is to procure iron and salt that the Naga visits the plains (87). Peaceful penetra- tion is effected by simple trade of this sort. The economic effect is to develop specialisation and differentiation of function to lay the foundation of economic organisation which is here presented in its simplest forms. 1. Marett, Anthropology, p. 169. 2. Census Report, 1911, vol. i., p. 13 el seq. 3. Ibid., p. 26. 4. Ibid., p. 29. 5. Census Report, 1911, vol. xii., p. 6. 6. Ibid., p. 16. 7. Census Report, 1911, vol. xxiii., pp. 22-26. 8. Report on the condition of the Santals, p. 67. 9. Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society, Dec., 1916, p. 3. 10. Castes and Tribes of Southern India, ii. 389. 11. Cochin Tribes and Castes, i. 3, 4. PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 43 12. The Lushei Kuki Clans, p. 21. 13. Ibid., p. 43. 14. Hutton, The Angami Nagas, p. 358. 15. Census Report, 1911, vol. iii., p. 138. 16. Report on the Condition of the Santals, pp. 66, 67. 17. Journal of the 'Bihar and Orissa Research Society, December, 1916, pp. 1-11. 18. Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society, December, 1920, p. 527- 539. 19. Census Report, 1901, vol. iii., pp. 47-67. 20. Castes and Tribes of S. India, ii., 383, 389. 21. Ibid., p. 26 et seq. 22. Castes and Tribes of S. India, iii., 6 et seq. 23. Ibid., p. 14. 24. Gazetteer of Upper Burma, vol. i., part 1, p. 497 et seq. 25. Hutton, The Angami Nagas, p. 161. 26. Castes and Tribes of S. India, vol. iii., p. 372 et seq. 27. Naga Tribes of Manipur, p. 166 sq. 28. Hobson Jobson, s.v. Jhum. 29. History of the New World called America, i. 333. 30. The Village Community, p. 75 et seq. 31. Arabia Infelix, p. 101 sq., picture, p. 103. 32. History of the New World called America, i. 340. 33. The Naga Tribes of Manipur, p. 50 et seq. 34. The Khasis, p. 39. 35. The Megalithic Culture of Indonesia, passim. See also The Semas, p. 391 sq. 36. Nature, December 15, 1921, p. 512. 37. The Sema Nagas, p. 214 n. 38. The Outcasts, G. R. Clarke, I.C.S., p. 6. 39. Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces, ii. 90. 40. Castes and Tribes of S. India, iv. 169. (Plate). 41. Ibid., vii.. p. 422 and p. 427. 42. Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society, December, 1916, p. 5. 43. Census Report, 1901, p. 61. 44. Ibid., p. 50. 45. Man, The Andaman Islanders, pp. 109, 110. 46. Hutton, Angami Nagas, p. 384-6. 47. Ethnographic Notes in Southern India, pp. 630-2. 48. Ibid., p. 624, cf. Crooke in J. R.A.I., xlix., 237 et seq. 49. Cochin Tribes and Castes, i. 89. 50. Ethnology of Bengal, p. 155. 51. Ibid., p. 27. 62. Ibid., p. 30. 63. Hutton, Angami Nagas, 28 sq., 364. 54. Keith, Antiquity of Man, p. 159. 55. Tylor, Early History of Mankind, p. 228 sq. 66. Man, The Andaman Islanders, p. 82. Census Report, 1901, p. 50. 57. Crooke, Popular Religion and Folklore of Northern India, ii. 193. 58. Ethnographic Notes in Southern India, p. 466. 59. Ibid., p. 469. 60. Castes and Tribes of S. India, vol. iii. 11. 44 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 61. Ibid., vol. ii. 385. 62. Ibid., vol. i. 99. 63. Ibid., vol. i. 119. 64. The Lushei Kuki Clans, p. 103 and p. 86. 65. The Senta Nagas, p. 180. 66. Anthropological Essays presented to E. B. Tylor, p. 23. 67. Early History of Mankind, p. 246. (1878 Edn.) 68. Anthropological Essays presented to E. B. Tylor, p. 23. 69. Ibid., p. 40. 70. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 60, part 1, p. 155. Cf. Journal Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 36, p. 13. 71. Man, Andaman Islanders, p. 159. 72. Ibid., p. 161. 73. ERE, xi. 875 d. The Angami Nagas, p. 403 sq. 74. The Angami Nagas, p. 79, p. 405. 75. Burmese Sketches, ii. 366. The Khasis, p. 12. The Angami^, p. 404. 75a. The American Indian (Clark Wissler), p. 122, p. 243. 76. Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal, p. 153. 77. Linguistic Survey of India, vol. iv., p. 247. 78. Tribes and Castes of Central Provinces, iv. p. 123. 79. The Khasis, p. 58. 80. The Angamis, p. 63. 81. The Andaman Islanders, p. 154. 82. The Naga Tribes of Manipur, p. 48. 83. The AngaiKis, p. 64. 84. The Lushei Kuki Clans, p. 29. 85. The Semas, p. 53. 86. Census Report, 1901, vol. hi., p. 66. 87. Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal p. 20 Report on the Condition of the Santals. p. 67. LECTURE III. The Linguistics of the Lower Culture Variability and Imitations The Classificatory System of Relationship Principles of Loans General Characteristics, Concreteness, Lack of Abstracts Effect of General Conditions Phonetics and Tones Education in the Lower Culture Special Linguistics Secret and Special Languages Sign and Gesture Language Tabus on Names as Things Legends and Myths Folklore and Poetry Dances. What can we learn of the mental habits of the lower culture by studying the language spoken there ? Shall we learn what will interest us most from the structure of the languages, or from the vocabularies, or from the way in which new ideas or things are dealt with and spoken of ? There is a deal of social history and social effort in every word, since there must at least be a concord between speaker and hearer as to the significance and import of the sounds. Yet as M. Levy Bruhl fitly reminds us, " II est probable que par suite des migrations des melanges des absorptions de groupes les uns par les autres, nous ne rencontrons nulle part une langue correspondant exactement a la mentalite qui s'exprime dans ses repre- sentations collectives " (1). The classical instance of " the rapidity with which a community may change all the characteristics which are generally supposed to indicate its race " (2) is to be found in the tangle of tribes on the North-East Frontier of India, all in a relatively low state of culture, where " in two generations all but the vaguest traces of their origin are lost " (3) . Languages are changed with every few miles of migration. Indeed, it is characteristic of these languages that they soon split up into dialects which are not mutually intelligible. Thus as Hutton tells the tale. Among the Semas " Seven men of different villages happened to meet by the road 46 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA one evening. They asked one another what they had got with them to eat with their rice. Each mentioned a different thing, atusheh, gwomishi, mugishi, amusa, akelhe, etc., including as some understood it, dried fish, meat, and various kinds of vegetables. They agreed to pool their good things and share alike, and sat down pre- pared for a feast, each one thinking how he had scored by agreeing to share with his neighbours. When they opened their loads, they all produced chillies " (3). In the nature of these forms of speech are tendencies to variation and elements making for the formation of dialectical differences, just as there are groups marked by " a peculiar vagabond strain " (4). When describing the classificatory system as " one of the great landmarks in the history of mankind/' Sir James Frazer finely puts it that " the distinction between the system of group relationship and the system of indi- vidual relationship coincides, broadly speaking, with the distinction between savagery and civilisation ; the boundary between the lower and the higher strata of humanity runs approximately on the line between the two different modes of counting kin, the one mode counting it by groups the other by individuals. Reduced to its most general terms, the line of cleavage is between collectivism and individualism ; savagery stands on the side of collectivism ; civilisation stands on the side of individualism " (5). I myself have found that what affects one member of a social group is believed to affect others of his social group, so that " The sense of social solidarity is such that all members of the social unit are constrained by custom to regard the tabued object as potentially dangerous by them, and therefore to be avoided" (6). Thus in studying the cases, as we find them in India, where the classificatory system either in full vigour or in a modified but still identifiable form, continues to indicate the structure of social units and their relations, we may note this expression of social PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 47 mentality as conclusive evidence of the social interests of the groups examined. It has long been known that " The Dravidians are in possession of a complete and typical system of the classificatory or group system of relationship " (7). Much has to be done ere we can determine the part which the South of India has played in the long past in shaping the social scheme as it now exists for " many of the greatest Hindu teachers were Dravidians and at the present day it is in the Dravidian region that the temples are most splendid, the Brahmans strictest and most respected "(8). Among the Birhors, that broken wandering folk of the hills and jungles of Chota Nagpur, Sarat Chandra Roy finds the classificatory system in force, with special features due to clan exogamy and the recognition of kinship through the father's side (9). The evidence of "language" is striking and unmistakeable. "The Birhor uses the same kinship term (Mamu) for his mother's brother and his father's sister's husband, and similarly the same term (Hatom) is used for the father's sister and the mother's brother's wife and to this day cross-cousin marriage in which these two relationships are combined in one and the same person, is not un- known in this tribe " (10). From the most backward of the tribes speaking Munda languages I turn to the Khasis, the most advanced, at any rate in linguistic power, of this group and there find a prohibition against the marriage with a daughter of a man's mother's brother so long as that uncle is alive (11). By reason of this notable prohibition, due, as I think, to the develop- ment of Khasi society on special lines (12) there is no common term for maternal uncle and father-in-law as in the cases such as Garo, where these marriages are pre- scribed or preferred. But as evidence of the order of things which once existed, this relation, 'U Kni, as he is called, is also the husband of the father's sister, thus pre- serving an archaic feature of social structure. In the 48 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA term Kha for male relations, we have direct evidence of the recognition of male kinship side by side with a matri- lineal system developing from conditions still prevailing among the Garos. Among the Sema Nagas, " If other- wise suitable, marriage with the mother's brother's daughter, or father's sister's son, is preferred " (14). This preference finds expression in the use of one and the same term Angu, for mother's brother and wife's father and of the same term Ani (which is a common Naga and Kuki form) for the father's sister, and the husband's mother (15). Sema terms of relationship exhibit curious features which may be due to the extraordinary social history of this very mixed people (16). Thus in Dravi- dian, in Munda and in Tibeto-Burman forms of speech are preserved linguistic forms which can be correlated with modes of social structure, typically associated with lower culture. Nothing in their experience can be more " concrete " more direct and constant in interest than the behaviour which by social custom they have to observe towards other members of the group in which they live. Thus the classi- fication of persons with whom by marriage and by the rules relating to marriageability they have special relations, is obviously a matter of prime interest, since the " classificatory system," as it is called, of relation- ship is found in its most notable forms among people whose languages afford evidence of a very low power of classification in general. Only the special prominence given in social attention to the matters which are associated by custom with the various relations, can explain this feature of their mental life, and it behoves us to search diligently for the principles on which the classificatory system is based, a task to which I shall return later when discussing social structure. On what principle does one language borrow words from another ? We read that " Whereas other Nagas readily borrow new words from Assamese or Hindustani PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 49 and assimilate them into their own tongue (this is parti- cularly noticeable in Sema) the Angami invents a word of purely Angami form. Thus an Angami speaks of a steamboat as mi-ru, literally fire-boat, while the Sema who on the Angami principle could perfectly well coin the word ami-shuka, would never dream of using anything but jahaz, even when speaking in his own tongue to other Semas. Similarly, while the Angami always speaks of a gun as Misi (= fire-stick) the ordinary word used by the Sema is alika, which really means the cross-bow used by his Chang and Sangtam neighbours, or mashcho, which seems to be borrowed from the Angami word " (17). In a note we find that " Some Angamis who went with the Naga Labour Corps to France saw aeroplanes for the first time, but were at no loss at all for a word, dubbing them kepronya (= flying machines) without hesita- tion " (18). Is there anything to show why one group should borrow freely from foreign sources while its neighbour should ingeniously invent words true to the current form ? Am I wrong in saying that we have cases of word formation on natural principles in instances such as the Kukis who give the name Miaocha to the harmless necessary cat ? There are Munda speaking folk who call it Pusi (19). There are descriptive words such as cheklaobi, the Meithei for a snipe which means the bird that calls chek chek. There are words which enshrine a local myth as the Meithei Nong-Thang-Kuppa, the flash of the Rain God's dao. I remember my interest in this aspect of mental activity when a Thado Kuki, who was quite unacquainted with tents, without hesitation described my tent as " pdn-in " literally cloth-house, as do the Angamis, Lhotas, Semas and Changs (letter from Mr. Hutton). As a matter of curiosity upon comparing the various words for gun in the hill dialects, I find that the Meithei calls it Nongmei, meaning thunder-fire, the Lushei calls it Si-lai, the Lakher call it Mei-Thei-Paw, the Thado 5o PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA call it Mepum, while in Kachin a flint lock is Miba. The word for fire, mei, appears in these words, including the Kachin form, though the actual word for fire in Kachin seems to be wan, which seems to be related to the form ban, commonly meaning sky in many dialects. Whatever the exact meaning of the Lushei word, silai, it is clearly a local word. In Chang it is nemthing iron tube. Konyak and Ao have words of the same import. In Ao it is prang-pung, said to mean the prang tube, an onomato-poeic compound. We may therefore con- clude that all these people drew on the resources of their own language for a word for gun, using various methods, analogy, visual and auditory description, concrete de- scription, etc. Yet the thing itself came to them from external sources. To turn to another area and another linguistic family, I find that the word for iron in Santali and Mundari Mdrhdt (20) conforms to local structure, but in the broken speech of folk such as the Birhors, the Juangs and Kharrias (21) who all get their supplies of the metal from Bengali traders, it is loha, an Indo-Aryan iron word. The Santals and Mundas are people who have developed a strong economic system, and are able to maintain themselves and their institutions against external pressure more successfully than feeble folk like the Birhors. The village smith is a member in many cases of the group, not an outsider. It is quite legitimate to infer that many groups in the lower culture are able of their own material in their own speech, to invent new words to describe new objects. But before we can formulate any definite principle for the preference in any given case of a loan word over a word of indigenous fabrication the general circumstances of the intercourse between the groups have to be known, and it is possible that as in the case of other novelties weight must be allowed to the prestige factor. As to the general characters of languages of the lower culture in India, Sir George Grierson says of the Munda PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 51 languages that " they belong to that class which possesses a richly varied stock of words to denote individual things and ideas, but is extremely poor in general and abstract terms. ... In a similar way nouns denoting relation- ship are seldom conceived in the abstract, but a pro- nominal suffix restricting the sphere of the idea is usually added " (22) . The languages of the hills of Assam (except Khasi, which is a member of the Austric family and has evolved on distinct lines, arriving at a grammatical device by means of which at will any root can be treated as an abstract) exhibit the same characters, the richly varied stock of words, the absence of abstract terms, the rigid definition of relationship terms by pronominal prefixes (23). Precisely the same phenomenon is found in other parts of the world as in America and in Melanesia where, as Dr. Rivers tells us (24) " The nouns which take the true possessive pronoun in Melanesia are of three kinds ; terms of relationship ; terms for parts of the body, and terms denoting expecially close possession." To the trend towards individual ownership and individual rela- tions which were started by the contact of the indigenous inhabitants with immigrants who disturbed the com- munal organisation of the country they invaded, are ascribed these features of Melanesian linguistics. In the same way the importance of the body, due to foreign ideas, gave " to parts of the body that social interest which made a definite system of nomenclature necessary." Be it remembered in this connection that terms of relationship are classificatory, so that " The term ' father ' for instance, is applied to all those whom the father would call brother, and to all the husbands of those whom the mother calls ' sister/ both brother and sister being used in a far wider sense than among ourselves 1 ' (25). The trend towards individualisation which is civilisation is variously marked. As to individual ownership of property, while there are evidences of communal rights in certain forms of property, as where thatching grass 52 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA " is usually village or clan property " (26), it may be said to be well established, since it extends to " special trees though they may grow on the land of another person so much so that a dispute will arise as to the ownership of a tree which is actually growing on the ground of a third person not a party to the dispute " (27). The use of possessive affixes to parts of the body which, after all, survives in our own speech since we say, " I have washed my hands/' when a Frenchman says, " I have washed the hands/' may be susceptible of the simple explanation that the most elementary advance in con- sciousness is that of self as distinct from other members of the same group, so that the use of possessives would follow on this fact. Languages such as Santali have preserved forms of inclusive and exclusive plurals, which might, as in Melanesia, " have arisen through a definite social need, a need for the distinction between acts performed by one or both of two peoples living in close intercourse with one another and yet preserving in large measure their own customs and interests " (28). The features of Santali society, composed of clans each marked from the others by separate " passwords/' and separate group worship, with strong social solidarity may be deemed to afford the elements required for the social need called in to explain this phenomenon in Melanesia. At the same time Naga society is composed of clans, each acting as independent social units in many matters of social interest, but there seem to be no precise in- dications of the use of the linguistic device of inclusive and exclusive plurals among Naga tribes. It may be that the device exists but has not been recorded. It may be that it does not exist because the Naga tribes on their travels from their original home have absorbed other groups on terms of equality. Intermarriages, the practice of local rather than clan exogamy and the development of sub-groups (29) may also explain the absence of this feature. PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 53 What, then, are we to make of the habit of mind dis- closed by the possession of a " richly varied vocabulary " in which '" the different varieties of some particular animal are denoted by means of different terms where we should use one and the same word " ? Can we be satisfied with the explanation that it is the outcome of " a tendency to coin a separate word for every individual concrete conception " ? As Sir George Grierson reminds us in the passage from which I have quoted, " This peculiarity is shared by most languages spoken by tribes in a primitive stage of civilisation (30). This tendency to concreteness of expression is associated intelligibly enough with a poverty of abstract ideas, or rather of linguistic devices to express abstract ideas which may be a different thing. In estimating the nature and extent of this tendency to concreteness of expression, be it remembered that evidence of the power of these groups of the lower culture to classify and systematise their conditions in linguistic expression is afforded by the existence among them of the classificatory system in whole or in part. Be it also remembered that as we have seen they extend their field of experience by allowing equal even superior validity to dreams and other impressions derived from the uncontrolled activities of the lower levels of consciousness which they interpret either conven- tionally or by reference to special persons which has much the same practical effect as the conventional method. It is clear that every individual specimen of any one of the varieties of some particular animal (which varieties are denoted by means of different terms), will be described by the same term as any other individual member of the same variety, and be identified with all the other indivi- dual members of that variety. " In Lushei we find nine words for ' ant ' and twenty different translations of the one word ' basket/ J There are doubtless nine kinds of ant which an expert entomologist would classify correctly, but they are different kinds. There are many 54 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA uses to which a basket may be put and the shape and size of basket suitable for one purpose are not suitable for other purposes. They are different things, and are spoken of and recognised as different things. The " interest " differs in each case, in kind as in degree. After all, systematists in modern science do not appear to be in perfect accord at all times in all matters pertaining to their craft, so that the evidence of the nature and extent in the lower culture of classification in matters of special interest has peculiar value to us in forming a correct estimate of their conditions. The test is a fair one, since the language of a group is significant in a high degree of the mental life of that group. By this test, then, the lower culture is char- acterised by definite features in its linguistics, and in framing further estimates of their activities in other directions the evidence of linguistics as to the concrete- ness of their mental attitudes must be taken into account. We know something in this country of the idea that " Le progres de la civilisation s'est produit par une action reciproque de la main sur 1'esprit et de 1'esprit sur la main " (31). It is characteristic of this level of culture where there is no machinery that everything tends to be individual, distinct. May I quote myself once again ? A chance remark may let in more light than all the careful inquiries and systematic notes. I was once in a village far from the beaten track and had shown them the magic lantern. I had given them practical illustrations of the utility of a repeating pistol ; I had amused them with a galvanic battery, and when all was over, I was enjoying their hospitality by the camp fire and had listened to tales of the bad old days when they were left severely alone by restraining influences. The conversa- tion flagged until I asked a man who had hung about me all day what of all that I had shown was the most sur- prising to him. That started a discussion which ended in a verdict that the strangest thing that the Sahib-log PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 55 had brought within their ken was coined money, and on further inquiry I found that its uniformity was the special feature which had so excited their interest. Nor is this to be wondered at, for at the level of their civilisation all their crafts are innocent of machinery ; everything they make tends to variety, everything is individual. This feature of their material life is reflected in their language, for they have a separate name for articles and actions which we classify together. They insist on the points of difference while we classify by identities" (32). A chance incident may reveal a social ideal. I was busy learning Thado Kuki and had reached the stage where " useful phrases/' conversational small talk were being acquired. I asked of my interpreter what is the Thado for I have enough to eat. Ka-va-tai. Now what is the Thado for I have enough to drink Zu ka-kam-tai. Proud in the possession of polite useful phrases, I went on, and reached my next village ahead of my coolies and interpreter. As in duty bound, they brought out stoops of zu, for the rice beer is refreshing to a weary man, and when I had had a glass I tried the new phrase. Zu ka- kam-tai, I said, gracefully waving away the dusky Hebe. The village immediately dissolved into laughter, and I feared I had said something improper when I merely meant to be grateful. When the interpreter arrived I asked him what " zu ka-kam-tai " meant. Huzur, he said, it means to be dead drunk. Then I saw that the limit of saturation for a Kuki was not mine, in the matter of rice beer. A word as to what may be learnt from a study of the phonetics and of the grammar of languages of the lower culture. There are preserved by groups of the lower culture methods of using sound which have either been discarded or have never been possessed by more advanced groups. There are phonetic differences which, as Dr. Rivers surmised of those characterising Melanesian languages, " must be due to definite structural differences 56 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA in the organs of speech, and it is most unlikely that these could be produced by such differences of environment as exist within the regions " (33). Thus far-reaching identifications may be effected by the scientific investiga- tion and correlation of phonetic data, especially those recorded among groups of the lower culture, since, as Mr. Richards has urged, " the typical Jungle Tribe of South India does not speak a typical Dravidian tongue, but a grotesque caricature of it" (34). As to the more prominent features of social mentality as they seem to be revealed by the set forms or gram- matical structure of languages of the lower culture, I do not think we shall ever reach a true estimate of the real significance of the social effort involved in the establishment of so many different organised modes of communicating with fellow men, members of the same social group, as to common needs, until we depart fully from our own traditionalism. It ought to be possible, as Sir Richard Temple urged years ago, to frame a theory of Universal grammar (35). Various are the devices which are used in the lower culture for grammatical purposes. Complexity marks the methods of the Andamanese dialects where they use prefixes whose function is purely to modify the meaning of a root, and so to form, in combination with the root, a pure stem, (36) prefixes to indicate personal possession of an intimate nature, where there is classification (an important piece of evidence of their mental power) of things animate and inanimate. Or take the Santali verb whose mysteries are sketched in outline by Sir George Grierson (37) and consider the ingenuity of a language which can convert any word into a verb by adding a simple suffix. Or again, in the Tibeto-Burman dialects there are languages with a wealth of tones (38), others that employ determinatives to bring out shades of meaning with a remarkable pre- cision (39), others, again, using couplets, grammatical complexity and grammatical order, but all efficient in PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 57 their purposes. But all this comes slowly ; these pheno- mena are the work of many generations. There have been changes, for in the songs and popular ritual formulas are preserved archaic modes of speech often now so mutilated as to have become completely unintelligible. Rich is the harvest which awaits the scholar who shall take in hand the comparative analysis of the archaic speech as preserved in the song and ritual of the lower culture and trace the life history of the speech, for there is a " biology of speech," and laws of that science can be best discovered by examination of the lower culture and its forms of speech, for which there is available much material from India. Nor are we concerned only with the diversity and range of linguistic devices as evidence of the power of the human mind. They afford evidence of the strength and constancy of social life. Thus special importance attaches to the institutions created in and by society by means of which the education of the lower culture is carried on and the traditions preserved without the artificial aid of writing. The elements are often obvious enough which make for variation and modifica- tion of the mental life of the lower culture, but at the same time the elements and factors in social life which make for continuity and stability possess a vitality and vigour altogether remarkable. EDUCATION. The educational system of the lower culture is simple. It centres in an Institution known as the Men's House, which, as Hutton Webster has shown, is of world-wide occurrence (40). In India we know it as the Morung or Kichuki of the Nagas (41) ; the Pakhonval of the Meitheis (42) ; the Nokpante of the Garos (43) ; the Zawl-buk of the Lushais (44) ; the Mandaghar of the Bhuiyas (45) ; the Giti-ora of the Mundas and Birhors (46) ; the Jonkh-erpa of the Oraons, Malers, Maria Gonds, Kandhs (47), the Gotalgarh of the Gonds of 58 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA Chattisgarh and the Feudatory States (48), while the Kurumbas know it as "the pundugar chavadi, meaning literally the abode of vagabonds " (49). It is not uni- versal since the Santals have it not. They have, however, a village official, the Jagmanjhi, " whose most important duty is apparently to look after the morals of the boys and girls, and if he is at all straightlaced, they must often lead him a hard life of it ... and Jagmanjhis have admitted to me that they have plenty of such love affairs to arrange " (50). The Khasis do not have this, but they are acquainted with it among their neighbours, the Bhois and Lalungs, for they have a special word, ka trang (51) for it. The Andamanese Jarawas, the widest group, build in the rains a communal hut, which shelters several families (52), and custom demands that "even at the homes they are careful to maintain this order, viz., of placing the bachelors and spinsters at either end of the building and the married couples in the space be- tween " (53). Among the Meitheis the house itself is no longer built, but the words, Pakhonval and Ningonval, show that they once possessed this institution, and they still have village officers, the Pakhonlakpa and Ningon- lakpa, who correspond to the Jagmanjhi of the Santals (54). It is disappearing among Nagas, for we find that with the Semas " It is occasionally found in a miniature form not unlike a model of a Lhota morung. Such a model is often built in times of scarcity, the under- lying idea apparently being that the scarcity may be due to the village having neglected to conform to a custom which has been abandoned. ... A miniature morung of this sort is always built when a new village is made (55). " In these days when alarms and excursions are no longer in the order of things, it is only used " on the occasions of ceremonies and gennas which, by traditional usage, call for a house definitely allotted to the young men of the clan. ... At other times it is used merely as a casual resort for the village bucks and perhaps as PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 59 an occasional sleeping place . . . among the Memi they are used by the young girls as well as the young men both in some cases using the same house, the young men sleeping on an upper shelf and the girls below them. The publicity probably entails great propriety of be- haviour " (56). It was a guard house. It was the sleeping place of the men of the community except the very old, who alone were allowed to sleep in the village. The Old Kukis (Chiru, Kom and Tikhup) allowed no woman to enter these buildings (56a). Its social importance lies in the fact that it was " a useful seminary for training young men in their social and other duties and an institution for magico-religious observances calculated to secure success in hunting and to augment the procrea- tive power of the young men " (57). The Pax Brit- annica, the spread of Christian morality, economic progress have contributed to the decay of the institution which had its abuses as well as its uses (58). There are grades, age-grades, in the adolescent life. Thus among the Oraoris a boy is admitted at about 11 or 12 years of age, when he is called a Puna Jokhar. Three years later he becomes a Majh-turia Jokhar or lad of the middle grade, in which he stays for three years at the end of which he becomes a Koha Jokhar, retaining his membership of the Institution to all intent and purposes till he has one or two children (59). The interesting feature is that the education in social matters is largely carried on by the adolescents them- selves, orally and by example, on purely traditional lines. The formation of special groups, isolated by social reasons, within a society, leads to specialisation in the use of words of the common stock and as Meillet (60) has shown, the opposite is true, viz., that a word may pass from a special group to the common stock. The lack of econo- mic specialisation in the lower structure is characteristic. But equally characteristic are the clearly marked divisions by age and sex, by social standing, by relationship, so 60 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA that there are features in the social life of the lower culture which, given the necessary conditions, would facilitate special linguistic developments by specialisa- tion consequent on parallel, conterminous or aterminous associations. Thus as a result of the special functions which women perform in the social economy, there have developed in many groups special words used only by women, whose influence as a factor producing variation would be enhanced by the possibility of local exogamy, bringing in women of alien stock, as mothers, directing the early education of the young. There are secret languages as with the Todas (61), who are often brought into intercourse with Badagas and Tamils, from whom they seek by this means to keep their conversation secret. Mr. Hutton finds that " There is a practice which seems to be known in most Sema villages of inverting or altering the order of words in a sentence or of syllables in a word, so as to make the language meaningless gibberish to anyone not knowing the slang. There does not seem to be any fixed system on which this is done. . . . There does not seem to be any very real advantage gained by the use of this slang beyond that of being able to irritate one's neighbours who do not know it, by speaking it in their presence. ... At the same time it is said that the Sema slang is used with some effect in trade, as it is possible for one man to warn another that the price asked by a third is too high. . . . This slang is also said to be useful in intrigues and un- doubtedly is used to make offensively personal remarks and to abuse strangers who do not understand it. ... In one Sema village, apparently the only one, Aichis- agami, the whole village has acquired this slang, and to such an extent that it has almost become the ordinary language of the village and is normally used by the people of the village in speaking to one another. . . . The result of this in Aichisagami has been the production of secondary slangs based on the first, which are spoken by PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 61 a number of the villagers in the same way that what may be called primary slang is used in other villages (62)." This is perhaps an exceptional case, but it gives an indi- cation of a way in which the diversity of dialects char- acterising this area may have arisen, and the alterations may, it is clear, extend to the order of the words, thus modifying the structure as a whole. Can we say that the languages of the lower culture as I have sketched them, are on an artificial not a natural basis of thought ? Is there any relation between the spoken language and what is called the language of signs ? Pieces of charred wood, chillies, bullets, stones, splintered bamboos, all these things are used as messages (63), whose import, whose meanings as symbols, are clear to all. Perhaps with development of graphic art, this method of communication may become more extended. But it is to the use of sign or manual language that I must turn. Parler avec les mains, c'est a la lettre, dans une certaine mesure, penser avec les mains. ... Si done la langue orale decrit et dessine, dans le dernier detail, les positions, les mouvements, les distances, les formes et les contours, c'est que le langage par gestes emploie precisement ces moyens d'expression (64). " Among the Angami Nagas the language of signs has reached a high state of develop- ment . . . indeed the writer has known a dumb man make a long and detailed complaint of an assault in which nothing was missing except proper names, and even these were eventually identified by means of the dumb man's description of his assailants dress and personal appear- ance "(65). This visual language is not symbolic, not as the message system referred to above, but is descriptive and concrete. Herein we may ponder the findings of the French linguist who holds that " Le langage visuel est probablement aussi ancien que le langue auditif . . . la plus part des langages visuels en usage aujourd'hui sont simplement derives du langage auditif" (65a). 62 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA Words are possessed of a concreteness, a value, a significance in social life such that it is sometimes custo- mary to place a ban upon words which by their associa- tion with sacred things or persons are thought to be able to influence the affairs of man. Thus a tabu is placed by the Mai Saren Santals on the word mat " when engaged in a religious ceremony or when sitting on a panchayat to determine tribal questions " (66) at the moments when their membership of the group is in special promin- ence. A Savara has no name for a numeral above twelve because " One day, long ago, some Saoras were measuring grain in a field, and when they had measured 12 measures of some kind, a tiger pounced in on them and devoured them " (67). I know of a village whose chief, a religious rather than a secular authority, if such a distinction be in any degree valid, " must not use abusive language to anyone whatever the provocation, nor must he lay an imprecation on anyone " (68) because so sacred is he as the man of the village that his word would have power to destroy since his words and acts are needed to make the village prosper. Among the Angamis, " Bad language must be avoided while a child's first cloth is being woven, as if bad language is used under such circumstances the child that wears it will be affected for the worse " (69). Variations in the factors which regulate the formation of social values would thus find expression in variations of linguistic values. LEGENDS AND MYTHS; I have described the languages of the lower culture in India as preserved without the " artificial aid of wilting/ 1 There is, however, current among the hill tribes of Assam (70) a myth that they once possessed this art but lost it because they used skins while their more prudent neighbours used boards. One day the dogs got at the skins, ate them all, and so destroyed forever PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 63 the art. One tribe points to a bodkin now used to pin their hair up as the pen they once owned and also as part of the same myth tell how, " to distinguish the sexes apart, the men tied their hair in front while the women tied it behind. . . . The men shortened their cloth and made it into a waistcloth, while the women lengthened their cloth, making of it a petticoat." Arts as useful as that of writing have been lost (71). It is often possible that there may be some shred of truth in these narratives which are told as true, as giving an account of a noted and notable, if negative, feature in their social environ- ment, and are therefore classifiable as myths. What made them think it necessary for them to account for their ignorance of writing ? What made them accept this account of their loss of the art ? As I said of another tale, " We may infer that the particular mechanism of the explanation was selected and the explanation itself accepted because they were in harmony with popular ideas of causation as regards social phenomena of this order. It gives us a glimpse into the minds both of those who invented the tale and of those who accepted it and adopted it as article of faith (72). There clearly has been contact with a society which practises the art of writing, such as the Meithei culture, but as evidence of the mentality which accepts as valid such a tale, it is specially interesting. Risley records Santal myths "concerning the origin of the five additional septs. . . . The eighth tribe, Baske, at first, belonged to the seven, but by reason of their offering their breakfast (baske) to the gods while the Santals were still in Champa they were formed into a separate sept under the name of Baske. The Besras (No. 9) were separated on account of the immoral behaviour of their eponym, who was called Besra, the licentious one. The tenth sept, Pauria, are called after the pigeon and the eleventh, Chore, after the lizard ; and the story is that on the occasion of a famous tribal hunting party the members of these two tribes 64 PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA failed to kill anything but pigeons and lizards, so they were called after the names of these animals. The twelfth sept, the Bedea, was left behind and lost when the Santals went up out of Champa. They had no father, so the story goes at least the mother of their first ancestor could not say who the father was and for this reason they were deemed of lower rank than the other septs." (73) These tales are good evidence that Santals consider themselves able to accept some irregular mode of worship, specially licentious behaviour, signally poor luck in hunting on a conspicuous occasion, or illegitimacy, as grounds for the formation of a new group. It is psychological evidence as regards the people who regard these accounts of social divisions as adequately explained by the tale. It is not historical evidence that the divisions were created under the circumstances stated. Of tales whose purpose would seem to be purely aesthetic, there is a store collected from all over India. They may be classified as Contes, " those which seem to be told, not for the explanation of any custom or the handing down of any record, but simply and solely for the sake of the tale itself. Here are fairy tales, animal stories, and cynical observations of human foibles " (74). As psychological documents they possess a significance apart from any evidence yielded by them incidentally for " When a social condition is mentioned incidentally, or is revealed by the general colouring of a myth we can be confident that it is not the pure product of imagination, but has a definite historical value " (75). In the folk tales told by the people as amusement, for their aesthetic value, resides a mass of interesting informa- tion, and one of the puzzles of scientific anthropology is to account for the distribution in many parts of the world of identical tales. Have they travelled during the long ages from one common centre or are they the pro- ducts of the human mind working on similar experiences, attaining similar results ? Convergence, contact, common conditions, independent inventions to which PRIMITIVE CULTURE OF INDIA 65 of these shall we incline ? It is easy in a way to construct hypotheses as to the transmission, through a series of intermediaries, of a tale found to be common to both Naga and Santal, such as the Naga tale of the Rat Princess and the Greedy Man (76). Actual direct transmission would be impossible by reason of the fundamental differ- ences of language. Of the poetry of the lower culture there are in the songs of the Nagas as recorded and translated by Mr. Hutton, sure evidence of a real poetical sense,