U THE DEFENCE OF GUENEVERE Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/defenceofgueneveOOmorrrich THE DEFENCE OF GUENEVERE AND OTHER POEMS BY WILLIAM MORRIS EDITED BY ROBERT STEELE PHILADELPHIA GEORGE W. JACOBS & CO. PUBLISHERS ". . . . THE SAME THAT OFT-TIMES HATH CHARMED MAGIC CASEMENTS OPENING 0*ER THE FOAM, OF PERILOUS SEAS IN FAERY LANDS FORLORN." 95^5 cL 1^0 INTRODUCTION The Romantic Revival. Ossian.— The beginnings of the Romantic Revival in England stand out in marked contrast to the works which represent to us the triumphs of the eighteenth century. At a time when Goldsmith, Churchill, Young, Blair and Thomson, Falconer and Gray were the acknowledged exponents of English poetry the first notes of revolt against formal, classic, and con- ventional expression were sounded through Western Europe by an obscure Scottish clergyman. In Ossian, poor in ideas and limited in range as it was, the eighteenth century found something of the mystery lying round and underneath Nature, of the heroes of dim legend and the spirits of the mist and the wind, and from its revolt of unfettered lyricism, the Romantic reaction may be said to date its inception. The immediate and widespread success of Ossia?t is almost as inexplicable to those who have read it as to ivi664578 INTRODUCTION the rest of the world of to-day. Beneath its unfamiliar form and the glorification of an unknown mythology of bards and heroes there was little of solid value to be found in it, and its acceptance shows how ripe was time and opportunity for change. It was trans- lated into nearly every European language, it in- fluenced every great writer of the time, it was a favourite book of Napoleon, of Walter Scott, of Goethe, it produced Blake. But with ardent admirers it found bitter enemies. That Macpherson claimed to have made literal translations of existing Gaelic texts was made the pretext for an attack, not only on the authenticity of Ossian, but on its intrinsic worth ; a new battle of the moderns and the ancients was fought over it, and the resulting controversy was long and bitter. In the midst of it appeared a second book destined to have an equal and more permanent influence on the literature of the nineteenth century. The Reliques of Ancient English Poetry. — Thomas Percy, an English clergyman, was already known as a writer of merit, who had translated from the Icelandic and other languages, when stimulated by the success of Macpherson, he published in 1765 his three small volumes of selections of English ballad poetry. The fortunate discovery some years earlier INTRODUCTION in a cupboard of an old house at ShifFnal of a manu- script collection of ballads made before the Civil War, which was being used for fire-lighting, was the basis of his work, and on the publication of his proposals he had received much encouragement and assistance. Thomas Warton, one of the most learned English scholars of the eighteenth century, examined for him Pepys' collection at Cambridge, other scholars and poets gave him ballads taken from the lips of peasants. He altered and corrected the poems, it is true, to meet the taste of the century : yet, infelicitous as are his emendations, nothing can take from his work the commanding place it holds in the history of English poetry. As Wordsworth once said, there was not an able writer of his time who would not acknowledge, as he himself did, his obligations to the Reltques. Miss Mitford, in her Literary Recollections^ says, " to that book ... we owe the revival of the taste for romantic and lyrical poetry, which had lain dor- mant since the days of the Commonwealth." Scott put the Reltques beside Ossian and Spenser : " above all I then first became acquainted with Percy. . . . The first time I could scrape a few shillings together I bought unto myself a copy of these beloved volumes ; nor do I believe I ever read a book half so frequently, or INTRODUCTION with half the enthusiasm." One of the most important of the results of Percy's publication was the attention it directed to the old ballads — the most typical and distinctive form of English poetry. Ballad Poetry. — No better description of it can be found than in some lines written by William Morris himself in 1887, when dealing with the poetry of feudal times. " Alongside of it (Chaucer's poetry) existed yet the ballad poetry of the people, wholly untouched by courtly elegance and classical pedantry ; rude in art, but never coarse, true to the back-bone ; instinct with indignation against wrong, and thereby expressing the hope that was in it ; a protest of the poor against the rich, especially in those songs of the Foresters, which have been called the Medieval epic of revolt ; no more gloomy than the gentleman's poetry, yet cheerful from courage, and not content. Half-a-dozen stanzas of it are worth a cart-load of the whining introspective lyrics of to-day ; and he who, when he has mastered the slight differences of language from our own daily speech, is not moved by it, does not understand what true poetry means nor what its aim is." But there is another side to these poems. Simple and natural as they are, treating of . . . INTRODUCTION " Old, forgotten far-oft' things And battles long ago," they preserve, too, an essential element of the mental attitude of the Middle Age to its surround- ings — the spirit of wonder. For these ballads are not only an epic of revolt and of sport and a popular history of the events which struck the popular imagination and were transformed by it, but they preserve the last handlings of medieval romance. In them we have the ultimate form in which Arthurian Romance appeared before the romantic revival, the popular rendering of the Norman-French fabliaux, and the popular fairy mythology of our English ancestors. Round the authorship of these ballads a long controversy has raged, principally due, it must be said, to the forgetfulness of the contro- versialists of medieval conditions. On the one side was the view that they were the work of the people themselves. On the other it has been said that " so far from its being a spontaneous product of popular imagination, it was a minstrels' adaptation from the romances of the educated classes. Everything in the ballad — matter, form and composition — is the work of the minstrel ; all that the people do is to remem- ber and repeat it." But this view assumes the xvii INTRODUCTION immense intellectual difference e.g. between Tenny- son and his middle-class audience, as existing in medieval times, as does the remark about " educated classes." As a matter of fact the " educated classes " of the Middle Age were not that public for whom romances were composed or recited, which was com- posed of the governing class, which was intellectually on the same footing as its inferiors. Moreover we have absolutely no evidence that the minstrels of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries were authors in any sense, whereas there is universal evidence of the spontaneous outburst of songs of occasion, which, if they last, naturally attach themselves to ballad cycles. An exception to this might be taken in the case of Blind Harry the Minstrel who collected and recited the popular traditions about Wallace, and gained food and clothing thereby, but apart from the fact that he was a poet before his blindness, which caused him to become a minstrel, his remains are hardly ballads in the strict sense as regards form, being in the heroic couplet. Yet in matter they breathe the full spirit of the Middle Age — legend and fact inextricably mingled — heroism and wonder. The Middle Age and Romance.— The spirit of wonder and of mystery lies deep in the very INTRODUCTION being of the Middle Age. Whatever lay outside the narrow circle of every-day experience was strange and possible, and the limits of the known were so strait that no man dare discriminate between the possible and the probable, between the more or the less likely. Once past the boundaries of the native manor, a wanderer was in a foreign land, one's neighbour had seen the Wandering Jew at Micklegarth while on a pilgrimage to the Hallows, the cinnamon bought at St. James' Fair was, it was known, shot from the nest of the phoenix with leaden arrows, the silk of my lady's robe owed its crimson to a dragon's life- blood. And as the metes of the natural and the unnatural were not defined, so also was there no division of the natural and the supernatural. The life of this world and that which is to come were to medieval folk as continuous as the round w^orld, and though death was among them the gateway from life to life, yet other lands might well have other laws, and folk dwell in some Secret Isle fearless of any change. The medieval non-reverence which so many take for irreverence is an expression of this sentiment. God and All Hallows were as near and as far as the King — sometimes terrible and inexplicable — sometimes gentle and debonair — but never inaccessible to those INTRODUCTION who should seek them rightly. With all this too was a certain kind of symmetry of notion — a republic of Emperor, subjects, and rebel Kings and subjects, — God and His angels, the Devil and his Friends, and the spirits neither good nor bad who found a vague existence between them. Outside every man, then, in the Middle Age lay a mysterious Universe, on which his manly heart looked out with na'fve wonder. It is this spirit in a new form, and on a different plane of knowledge and sentiment, that revived at the end of the eighteenth century. The Rowley Poems of Chatterton. — Chat- terton is almost the only predecessor of Scott in the Romantic movement of whom we have not yet traced the influence. An appreciation of his work should be left to a poet ; Coleridge has written it in the Monody on his death, and Keats in the dedication of Endymion. The lines of Wordsworth, " The marvellous boy. The sleepless soul, that perished in his pride," describe his character to the core. His productions, said Campbell, recall those of an ungrown giant — incomplete, with the touch of an untaught master hand ; the promise of a splendid maturity, side by side with commonplace imitations of magazine verse. INTRODUCTION His true inspiration was not the verse of older poets but the remains of antiquity about him. St. Mary Redcliffe spoke to his inmost being from every stone and window, and created for him again the dead souls who had built it and filled it. The Rozvley Poems were not unworthy to be edited by Thomas Tyrwhitt, and will go down to posterity as one of the landmarks of English Poetry, while even in the verse written on the accepted models of his day, the origins of some of the finest lines in " Kubla Khan " may be not obscurely discerned. He is one of the fathers of English Poetry, however, not alone because of his influence on poets greater than himself, but in right of the beauty and originality of his own pro- duction. " In one of the last and finest of his poems, the * Ballad of Charitie,' he anticipates the peculiar manner and sensuous beauty of Keats, before Keats is even born. And more than this, Chatterton anticipates, by nearly a century, that phase of our more recent verse which Mr. Pater has designated * the Esthetic School of Poetry.' The charm of the Rowley Poems lies here ; it is a charm of manner refined on manner ; of a sensuous poetical tempera- ment finding expression in its reveries of some poetical mode or figure, far removed by time, and INTRODUCTION dimmed by the glamour of antique circumstance." His influence on his time was, too, important as an impulse to antiquarian research. The controversy round their genuineness, which in our days would not have lasted ten minutes, inspired inquiry into realms of literature utterly unknown even to pro- fessed students, and his tragic death ensured an audience for its results. The history of English Poetry between Chatterton and Coleridge contains some great names, but none that have created a school or deeply influenced their successors. Among them are Cowper, Campbell, Blake, and Burns. But the consideration of these belongs to a general history of literature, and we must content ourselves with recalling that while they promise the sunrise, they are but the first glories of the dawn. Lyrical Ballads (1798). Coleridge and Wordsworth. — The publication of this little work marks the beginning of the Romantic Revival. Like many other important books its publication attracted little attention, and the 500 copies sold resulted in a loss to the publisher, but a volume whose first piece is the " Ancient Mariner " and whose last is " Tintern Abbey " could hardly fail to INTRODUCTION exert its influence on any mind open to change. It was the result of a friendship between two intensely original and creative intelligences at the critical point of their development. Both had written respectable verse, but during the years of constant association (1797-8) in the Quantocks, their enthusiasm was blown to a white heat, and " Christabel " and " Kubla Khan " were produced then as well as the pieces published in the Lyrical Ballads. The principles actuating the authors may be studied at length in the (1800) preface to the second edition — they underlie the whole romantic movement. The poets are curiously alike yet different. Each is master of the perfect phrase — yet the distinction made between the charm of Wordsworth and the magic of Coleridge is not merely verbal. " The Ancient Mariner " and " Genevieve " are among the most popular repre- sentatives of romantic poetry, and deservedly so. On the latter the poet has lavished all the graces of chivalry at its ideal exaltation, in the former he has touched the limits of invention and belief. He stands alone between Spenser and Rossetti. Byron and Keats. — Before leaving this period a word must be said of the other great poets of the day — Keats, Shelley, and Byron. Byron, instinct INTRODUCTION with the matter of poetry, hardly ever attained its form in any measure of perfection, and it is to this that he owes the Continental reputation he enjoys, and the partial oblivion in England he suffers, for this can never be translated, while of that he is amongst the richest in our literature. Shelley has had no successor till after the days when our study ends, and Keats, though in some immortal poems he has touched the very heart of romance, experi- mented in so many forms that it is difficult to foresee in what direction his muse would have ultimately tended. Southey, an early companion of Coleridge and his friends, rendered inestimable service to the progress of the movement by his edition of Malory's Morte d^ Arthur — a compendium of Arthurian romance whose sources are not as yet fully known, but which superseded in popular favour not only the ancient romances from which it was drawn, but the later ballad epic which was its rival. Walter Scott. — We are in some danger, in these days, of under-estimating the place which Walter Scott will fill in the history, not only of our own, but of European literature. His influence on England any reader of ordinary cultivation may estimate if he will reflect for a few seconds, — but to quote the words INTRODUCTION of a recent writer — " what is infinitely more startling — what gives us more impressively the measure of a genius as transcendent as it was unobtrusive — is the authority it almost simultaneously asserted over the thought and methods of the foreign schools of romance." Hugo and Balzac, de Vigny, Merimee, and Dumas were his imitators, Goethe and Chateau- briand his panegyrists ; Quentin Durward made Ranke a historian, and inspired the Annales des Condes. His works were translated into French and German as they appeared, and were received with passionate approval. We have already spoken of Ossian and Percy as early influences on Scott's development. He owed little to the writers of his time. His first book was a translation from Burger and his second from Goethe. His first original work was published in conjunction with Lewis (who deserves mention here for the excellence of the ballads in his fantastic " Monk ") in the Tales of Wonder, to which Scott contributed " William and Ellen," " The Eve of St. John," and some other pieces. The collaboration is thus com- memorated by Byron (1809) just after the publication of " Marmion " : — ** All hail, M.P. ! from whose infernal brain Thin sheeted phantoms glide, a grisly train ; INTRODUCTION At whose command * grim women ' throng in crowds, And kings of fire, of water, and of clouds, With * small gray men,' * wild yagers ' and what not. To crown with honour thee, and Walter Scott." Scott's personal preparations for his work lay rather in his enormous historical reading, and his eagerness as a student. " He was as pleased with the capture of some fag-end of a song as his freebooting ancestors when they lifted cattle in Cumberland," said an old friend, and it was this determination to gather up all fragments of his heritage of song that marks him out as the heir in succession of the native and noble line of Romantic Poets. His Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border (1802) is an inexhaustible storehouse of these remains, and one of the most potent influences in bringing about the success of the revival. Yet his preparation would have, one feels somehow, stopped short of achievement, if it had not been for the happy accident of a friend endowed with a memory Eastern in its retentiveness, who had heard the first part of " Christabel " read by Coleridge, and repeated it to him. He sat down under that inspiration and wrote " The Lay of the Last Minstrel," to the success of which we owe, implicitly, the whole of Scott's later work. His verse falls short of his inspiration by this, that he lacked something of the artistic conscience ; INTRODUCTION as Mr. Watts-Dunton says, " the distinctive quality of Scott is that he seems to be greater than his work — as much greater indeed, as a towering oak seems greater than the leaves it sheds." The Romantic Movement in Germany and France. Carlyle. — It is no part of our scheme to give anything like an account of the growth of the movement in these countries. The Romantic School in France especially has had com- paratively little influence on the development of our own literature. The political situation — the enmity between England and France in Napoleonic times, followed by the long years of the Restoration Monarchy — may account for this, but the fact remains that German Literature during the whole of that period was the most potent foreign influence on our own. We may quote from a somewhat unfriendly critic a characterisation of their work. "They intro- duce a new tone into German poetry, give their works a new colour, and in addition to this, revive both the spirit and the substance of the old fairy- tale, Volkslied, and legend. . . . Research in the domains of history, ethnography and jurisprudence, the study of German antiquity, Indian and Graeco- Latin philology, and the systems and dreams of the INTRODUCTION Natur-philosophie, all received their first impulse from Romanticism. They widened the emotional range of German poetry, though the emotions to which they gave expression were more frequently morbid than healthy. As critics, they originally, and with success, aimed at enlarging the spiritual horizon . . . and vowed undying hatred to all dead conventionality in the relations between the sexes. The best among them in their youth laboured ardently for the intensi- fication of that spiritual life which is based upon a belief in the supernatural " (Brandes, Main Currents). Starting from Herder and Goethe, the German Romanticists who have exercised most influence in English literature are Burger, the Schlegels, Tieck, Musaeus, Richter, Fouque, Arnim and Brentano, Hoffman, and the brothers Grimm. Coleridge and Wordsworth had visited Germany after the publication of the Lyrical Ballads, but their work shows little trace of any effect of the contemporary but independent movement of the German Romanticists. The influence of this school was exercised most directly on Campbell, Scott and Carlyle. In Campbell it is apparent in his ballads, while the earliest literary work of the others was based on the writings of this INTRODUCTION school, Carlyle in especial being deeply indebted to it. His life of Schiller was praised by Goethe, and his translations of Wilhelm Meister in 1824 and his specimens of German Romance (1827) show the direction in which his mind was at work, and the influences which formed his character. His later work carried him into other fields and his Romantic Puritanism became one of the primary forces of the Middle Victorian Era. Tennyson. — With Shelley and Keats the produc- tion of fine poetry ceased till Tennyson came to his own with the publication of two volumes of his Poems in 1 842. Here he is at the high-water mark of inspira- tion. The music of his verse, the homely simplicity and tenderness of his language, the nobility and aloofness of his themes produced an extraordinary effect on his time, deprived for years of the stimulus of great poetry. " The Princess " and " In Memoriam " served to mark the turning-point of his career, and "Maud" in 1855 was the last work of Tennyson's that mattered. Then came the transition into the " Idylls of the King," where romance was definitely abandoned for the presentment in verse of the ideal Englishman of the sixties. Such masterpieces as " The Lotos Eaters," " The Lady of Shalott," the " Morte INTRODUCTION ^ d'Arthur," " Sir Galahad," " Oriana," were not easily repeated. Canon Dixon gives a vivid account of the influence of Tennyson on the youth of his time, and more especially of Morris's attitude towards him, one of " defiant admiration." " We all had the feeling that after Tennyson no farther development was possible, we were at the end of all things in poetry." Ruskin. — The other great force of the early fifties was John Ruskin. Scott had attracted him to the Middle Age — but almost exclusively on the side of the arts, with architecture as their crowning embodi- ment. Carlyle was his teacher, and his first work of importance, M 80, 81, 82, 83. Dinadan, 34, 35, 50. Dixon, Canon, xxxv, xxxvi. Ellayne, 216, 217, 218, 219. Enoch, 21. France, Philip of, 162. France, 66, 74. Froissart, xlv. sqq., 142, 247. Galahad, Sir, xliv, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47. 48, 49. 50, 55, 57» 58, 59, 242. Ganys, Sir Bors de, 49, 50, 55, 58, ^59- ^. Gareth, Su:, 20, 34, 35, 239, 240. Gascons, 67. _ Gauwaine, Sir, xliii, xliv, xlv, i, ^3> 8, 9, 14, 34, 5.1, 239- Geflfray Teste Noire, 133, 134, 135, 136, 142, 247. Gervaise, Sir, 196, 197. »53 INDEX Giles, Sir, 150, 154, 227, 228. Giles, 196, 197, 204. Glastonbury, 19, 24. Glatysaunt, 34, 241. Godmar, 207, 208, 210, 211, 212, 213. Graal, xliii, xliv. Guendolen, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129. Guenevere, Queen, i, 7, 19, 20, 21, 23> 25, 27, 28, 31, 35, 43, 229. Guesclin, du, 67, 71, 84, 87, 88, 94, 99, 102. Guilbert, King, 143, 144. Guillaume, Sieur, 155, 156. Guy, Sir, 143, 147, 148, 158, 159. Hardy, Sir Ozana le Cure, 55, 56, 57. 58, 59- Harpdon, Sir Peter, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 72, 73, 74, 75, 77, 78, 79. 80, 8i, 82, 83, 84, 87, 88, 89, 90, 97, 245. Hector, 76. Helen, 76. Hugh, Sir, 159. Isabeau, 196, 204. Iseult of Brittany, 32, 35, 42, 46, 241. Jehane, 209, 210, 211. John, Father, 224, 225, 226. John, Sir, 150, 158. John of Castleneuf, i33' ^, Joseph of Arimathea, xliii, 24, 241. Katherine, Saint, 49, 244. Kay, 35, 240, 242. La fausse Garde, 9, 240. Lambert, Sir, 6S, 70, 72, 74, 75, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 91. Lance, Sir John Bonne, 133, 135, 247. Launcelot, Sir, xliv, xlv, 3, 4, 7, E:io, II, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 43, 45) 48, 5°, 5i, io3, 104, 147, 148, 239. Lauvaine, 51, 244. Lionel, Sir, 51. Louise, Lady, 186, 188, 189. Lucius, Emperor, 29, 30, 241. Lucy, Saint, 49, 243. Lusac Bridge, 66, 68, 70, 245. Macpherson, xiv. Mador de la Porte, 44, 242. Malony, xliii. Margaret, Saint, 22, 49, 240, 243. Margaret, 182, 183. Marguerite, La, 160, 161, 162. Mary Magdalen, 33. Mary, The Virgin, 149, 196, 205, 224, 225, 226. Mellyagraunce, 9, 10, 11, 240. Miles, Lord, 154. Miles, 196, ip7, 204. Morris, William, xxxiii, sqq. Mountfort, Countess, 102. Newcastle, John of, 135. Oliver, Sir, 164, 166. Oliver, 192, 193. Ortaise, 133. Ossian, xiu. Palomydes, 34, 42, 46, 241. Paris, 208. Paul, 33. Pembroke, 66. Percival, 45, 50. Percy, Reliqucs, xiv. Peter, 33. Phelton, 66. Picard, Jacques, 142. Plombiere, Peter, 63, 64. Poictou, 93. Rapunzel, 109, no, in, 1x2, 118, 121, 123, 124, 125. Robert, Sir, 122, 172, 173, 207, 208, 209, 211, 212, 2i6, 217, 219, 220. Roger, Lord, 163, 164. 254 INDEX Roland, Knight, 225, 226. Roland, Sir, 172, 174. Rossetti, xxxi, xxxii, xxxvii, xli, xlii. Rouen, 247. Roux, Alleyne, 134. Rowley Poems, xx, xxi. Ruskin, xxx. Sangreal, The, 44, 48, 242. ' Sanxere, 66, 245. Scott, xiv, XV, xxiv, xxv. Sebald, King, log, no, in, 113, 116, 117, 121, 123, 125, 127, 128. Shelley, xxiv. Solomon, King, 48, 243. St. George, 65, 72, 97. St. Ives, 72. St. Joseph, 24. Stamford Bridge, 216, 217, 220. Swinburne, xxxix, xl. Tennyson, xxix, xxxv, xli. Tristram, 34, 35. Ursula, 171, 172, 173. Ventadour, 134, 248. Verville, 135, 136. Violet, EUayne le, 196, 205. Wade, 103, 246. Watts-Dunton, xxvii, li. Westminster, 66. Witch, The, 109, no, iii, 112, 115, 117, 127, 128, 129. Wordsworth, xvii, xx, xxii, xxviii. Yoland of the Flowers, 191, 192, 193- »5S Richard Clay & sons, Limited, bread street hill, e.c., and bungay, suffolk. YC159177