THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY AND COLONIZATION OF AMERICA. BY JOHN B. AND MARIE A. SHIPLEY. LONDON : ELLIOT STOCK, 62. PATERNOSTER ROW, E.G. S5" CONTENTS. CHAPTER > AGE INTRODUCTION - V I. THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY AND COLONIZATION OF AMERICA - 7 I II. LEIF ER1KSON : A PLEA BEFORE CONGRESS - 30 III. SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS - - 62 IV. THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492 - 86 V. A FITTING CELEBRATION- - Il8 APPENDIX TO CHAPTER II. - 14! APPENDIX TO CHAPTER IV. - - - 144 INTRODUCTION. IT is becoming more and more the requirement of the age, that history should be subjected to the same scientific treatment as is applied to other branches of study ; that it should be stripped of every particle of myth and romance, and investi gated by exact methods. In dealing with the story, as ordinarily told, of the discovery of America by Columbus, we find it involved from first to last in a cloud of myths, which the most careful research fails to clear away ; while with regard to the rival discoveries dealt with in this book, we have at hand data which though scanty are reliable. These expeditions were sent out and conducted in a business-like way, without any of the fantastic fanfaronade that attended the operations of Columbus ; and although many invaluable docu ments containing more precise details are lost, yet we have accounts which, imperfect as they are, vi INTRODUCTION. place the discoveries of Cabot on at least as firm a footing of fact as those of Columbus, without any of the fabulous and superstitious representations with which the descriptions by Columbus of his own operations are surcharged. Even the accounts of the Scandinavian voyages, 500 years before Columbus, are of a much higher quality as regards reliability, and afford a strong contrast between the matter-of-fact statements of the North and the exaggerated fables of the South. We are approaching a moment at which a definite course of action becomes imperative. The nineteenth century should not be looked upon by succeeding ages as the one which gave its seal and sanction to historic fable, as would certainly be the case if the United States were allowed, not only to act upon blundering conclusions, but to obtain the acquiescence of other nations in the same misreading of history. The vital question is not so much who discovered America, as which part of Europe, the North or the South, gave the impetus to American civilization. The common assertion is, that the Columbus discovery was the only one that pro duced definite, permanent, and beneficial results, in contradistinction to all previous expeditions ; whereas the exact contrary is the case. The American civilization of the present day is the direct consequence of the Cabot voyages, and of the English colonization which arose out of the INTRODUCTION. vii claims of England to the possession of the country, which were based upon these voyages. These latter, again, were directly inspired by the knowledge, derived through the English trade with Iceland in the fifteenth century, of the earlier Scandinavian voyages and explorations. England can point to the United States of America as her greatest and proudest work, as much her own creation as Canada, Australia, or South Africa; and this would of itself give her a valid claim to regard the United States as a portion of Greater Britain. The two countries, which were severed more than a hundred years ago by the exactions, inter ference, and greed of an English monarch, ought to be reunited by the enlightened minds of the future. With a common language, common ideas, common aims, and their forces united to secure the peace and progress of mankind, the two great powers would form a governing force for the world, leading it on to higher progress, and repressing acts of injustice, wherever perpetrated. This is a grand and noble ideal, which fills many an advanced and enlightened English mind ; but at present the political ambition of the United States is turned in precisely the opposite direction, being devoted to the task of dominating the entire New World, and shutting out for ever European influence of every description, whether commercial or political. viii INTRODUCTION. The celebration of the Columbian discovery of America on the lines proposed by the United States is chosen as involving no close connection with Europe ; while it was fondly hoped that it would form a bond of sympathy with the South American Republics. The recognition of the discoveries of the Scandinavians and Cabot, on the other hand, would logically involve a close and friendly union with England, if not with Scandinavia, and therefore a complete severance from their Spanish-American allies, a programme which does not in any way suit the present political aims of the United States. These peculiar designs on the part of Americans, so different from what would have been imagined or expected in England, were openly and plainly stated to Mrs. Shipley, then Miss Marie A. Brown, when she went to Washington in 1888 to present to Congress her plea for the recognition of the Leif Erikson discovery, which is printed in this volume. When she arrived in Washington the scheme for a Columbus celebration was already cut and dried. The first part of this was the invitation to all the governments of North and South America, except Canada, to send delegates to a Pan-American Conference to be held at Washington. What was expected from this conference will be seen from the following paragraph from a leading article in the Washington Post of April 19, 1888: "It is INTRODUCTION. ix believed that the interchange of opinions at that meeting will result in a closer bond of union between the governments named and the United States, and that our own commercial interests will be greatly benefited. There is no reason why this country should not obtain the bulk of the trade with Central and South America, and there is no doubt that the commissioners appointed to repre sent our own government will fully appreciate this fact, and present to the foreign commissioners the mutual advantages that might accrue from a closer commercial union." The significance of these words lies in the fact that the arrangements for the conference were made by the same Senate and House Committees who had charge of the project for the Columbus celebration of 1892-93, and that the two matters, though nominally distinct, were regarded as forming parts of one and the same scheme for drawing South American trade away from Europe, to the advantage of the United States. This may be further illustrated by the following quotation from the address of Mr. Alex. S. Anderson, at a hearing given by the House Committee on foreign affairs to the Board of Promotion for the Columbus celebration, of which Mr. Anderson was the secretary and organizer : " The immediate object of the proposed celebration and exposition is, of course, a tribute to the memory of Columbus ; but x INTRODUCTION. s~ outside of this idea, the leading purpose is to stimulate more intimate commercial and social relations between the United States and the several sister nations of the three Americas." Such, in brief, is the scheme of the proposed Columbus celebration in the United States, a scheme which, as Professor Brown-Goode, assistant secretary of the Smithsonian Institution in Wash ington, said to Miss Brown, in the course of a long conversation on the subject, originated in the Gulf States at the time of the New Orleans Ex hibition. " Regard for historical truth," he con tinued, " has nothing in the world to do with it. Columbus is taken as the figure-head for a large financial scheme or speculation, and such a mixture, to my mind, is a disgrace to the nation. The two things ought to be kept widely apart. Historical research is one thing, and a purely business undertaking quite another." The same gentleman had previously written to Miss Brown in London : " I am impressed with the plan which you have so enthusiastically worked up, and am sensible of the justice of the cause which you are promoting." Several other professors at the Smith sonian admitted the fact of Leif Erikson s dis covery of America, and his just claim to recog nition. Professor Ward even went so far as to agree with Rev. Minot J. Savage, an eminent Unitarian minister of Boston, that the way to INTRODUCTION. xi arrive at all the facts in the Leif Erikson matter was to have a government commission appointed to examine the records at the Vatican. But who was there to urge such a measure upon Congress ? The learned staff at the Smithsonian Institution ought to have done it ; their united voice would have carried great weight both with Congress and with the nation at large. But the Smithsonian Institution had also heavy stakes in the Columbus celebration. The scheme included an expansion of the National Museum, and a permanent ex hibition of American antiquities ; this collection, gathered from the " three Americas," to be the property of the Smithsonian Institution. A gentle man connected with the geological survey, Major Powell, also in high standing at the Smithsonian Institution, was the ardent advocate of this branch of the Columbus celebration scheme, and, of course, a warm admirer of Columbus. The pro fessors of that august institution disavowed any collusion with Major Powell, and denied that he was authorized to work in its behalf ; nevertheless, the learned body were very careful not to manifest such undue interest in historic truth as to frustrate the zealous Major s endeavours. So careful were they not to endanger the success of these plans, that Professor Goode, who had charge of the lecture arrangements, absolutely refused to allow Miss Brown to lecture on the subject in the National xii INTRODUCTION. Museum, on the ground that the matter was " con troversial," although the institution presumably existed for the investigation of controversia matter, and Miss Brown had been assured by other professors, and by Colonel Dawson, the Commissioner of Education, that she was entitled to a hearing before any learned institution what ever, as she had " thrown entirely new light on the subject." With these conflicting interests to contend with, the office devolving upon Senator Hoar and ex- Governor Long, of Massachusetts, of presenting to Congress the memorial which accompanies the plea, urging the recognition of Leif Erikson as the first discoverer of America, was one of which they were by no means proud, although the memorial bore more than a thousand signatures, among them those of the presidents and officers of the historical societies of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Wis consin, and Virginia. The Rev. Minot J. Savage, of Boston, in a letter introducing Miss Brown to ex-Governor Long, and asking him to present her memorial to Congress, wrote : "If Miss Brown is right, and it seems to me she is, you may some time be glad that I wrote you this letter." The Norwegian and Swedish Congressmen, Knute Nelson and John Lind, promised the strongest possible support from the Scandinavians of the north-west. But all this influence was of no avail. INTRODUCTION. xiii The memorial was presented, and a hearing was accorded to Miss Brown by the Senate Committee in charge of the Columbus celebration, when Miss Brown read the plea for Leif Erikson contained in this book. This was listened to with profound attention ; there was no discussion, but the plea was ordered to be printed for the use of the Committee. Nothing, however, came of this ; the business pressure was too strong the other way, and no appropriation was made. Senator Hoar had twice over assured Miss Brown, in the presence of Mr. Long, that should Congress refuse to grant the money for researches in the Vatican, this could easily be raised among scholars. " The Anti quarian Society of Worcester, Massachusetts, would do it in an instant, or the people of Boston." These words were never made good. The president of the Senate, Mr. John J. Ingalls, besides many personal assurances of sup port and consideration, wrote Miss Brown privately : " I agree with you, however, in thinking that the truth of history ought to be established, and if Columbus is a dishonest pretender to the position in the annals of this country which he has so long occupied, he should be displaced, and the rightful discoverer of the continent should receive the long- delayed honours to which he is entitled. My sym pathies continue with you in the project which you have in hand, and as I said to Senator Hoar after xiv INTRODUCTION. I left you, I shall feel disposed to lend whatever influence I may possess to the full presentation of your views to the American people." This meant as little as the rest. In this matter Congress represented the national state of mind. All that Miss Brown accomplished was to lay the matter thoroughly before the public in lectures, and obtain the widest possible circula tion of her views through the newspaper press, thus getting the subject discussed from Maine to Cali fornia. A very extensive lecture tour took her up to Winnipeg in Manitoba, where she received a far more hearty welcome than anywhere in the States. She lectured there under the auspices of the His torical and Scientific Society, the Mayor taking the chair ; and leading members of the society testified that the Canadians felt pride and joy in believing that a part of Canada, certainly Labrador and Nova Scotia, were in the Vinland that Leif Erikson discovered. They recognised the value of Miss Brown s researches, the correctness of her deduc tions, and the necessity of her continuing these researches as planned, i.e., in the Vatican and other monastic libraries in Europe, for, as they said, the sagas could never definitely settle the question. This review of the action of Congress on these important historical questions, in which America professes so keen an interest, is put forward solely INTRODUCTION. xv with the purpose of showing how little genuine concern for historic truth can be expected from that nation when the truth happens to conflict with their political or commercial interests, and how hopeless it is to expect an impartial examination of matters upon which they have long since made up their minds in accordance with the promptings of other and less scientific considerations. The following pages treat of the chief events designated as discoveries of America. The three principal chapters were written at different times, as occasion demanded. Collectively they afford the reader a complete survey of the present historical campaign, showing more definitely than has pre viously been attempted the connection between the three discoveries, and the influence of each on the present civilization of America. This involves a readjustment of the honours of the discovery. The people of the United States are about to celebrate this event as an honour first to themselves, and secondly to Columbus and to Spain ; but as their own role in the matter was merely passive, it becomes necessary to call atten tion to the paramount claim of England, the country that did the most of all for them, to the honour of having bestowed upon them language, laws, and free institutions, all of which are largely founded on the same Scandinavian civilization under which their country was originally discovered. xv * INTRODUCTION. In the closing chapter a suggestion is made for a more fitting and comprehensive celebration of the whole discovery than has ever been proposed from any single point of view, and one by which the subject in all its length and breadth could be laid plainly before the world, doing away with many mistaken notions, and forming the starting-point for a new political and commercial era in the relations between the Old World and the New. THE AUTHORS. EALING, LONDON, December, 1890. CHAPTER I. THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY AND COLONIZATION OF AMERICA. THERE is one question that has many times been asked, but probably not so often satisfactorily answered, since the idea of a great World s Fair in honour of Columbus first took root in the public mind. It has been asked in public and asked in private ; asked in the columns of newspapers and asked " Over the Teacups," and perhaps even at the immortal Breakfast Table itself. It is a question that, from a national point of view, lies at the root of the whole matter, and one that every patriotic American will wish to have answered definitely and decisively. The question is, " Did Christopher Columbus ever touch the mainland of North America, and, if so, when and where ?" The only answer that can possibly be given to this inquiry is, that Columbus never saw, much less stood upon, the shores of the continent of North i 2 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. America. In no sense was he the discoverer of that great country which is now known by the name of the United States of America. His marauding and slave-hunting expeditions were confined to the islands, and the adjacent coasts of South and Central America. The very situation of the first land he saw is doubtful : it is known that it was one of the islands of the Bahamas, but which one it was is still a question. Governor Blake, of the Bahamas, " after a great deal of minute and well- reasoned observation on the spot, has come to the conclusion that the real place where Columbus landed was what is now called Watling s Island, and not Cat Island, as has hitherto been usually believed." It was from this spot that he " wrote home to their Catholic majesties that he should be able to supply them with all the gold they needed, with spices, cotton, mastic, aloes, rhubarb, cinna mon, and slaves. Slaves as many of these idola ters as their highnesses shall command to be shipped. Thus ended the visions of those simple natives who, on the arrival of the Europeans, had run from hut to hut, crying out, Come, come and see the people from heaven ! Some of them lived to suspect the bearded strangers had quite a dif ferent origin." (Sir Augustus J. Adderley, in a description of the Bahamas written for the Com missioners of the Colonial Exhibition, London, 1886.) THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 3 In connection with this subject, it may be remarked that Columbus came very near discover ing the mainland of Florida, for he was heading directly for the southern part of the peninsula when he was induced to turn and take a more southerly course some say by a flight of sea-birds, while others affirm that he was guided by the more prac tical counsels of Martin Alonzo Pinzon, his second in command, who is shrewdly suspected of having been in those waters before, and of knowing better where he was than Columbus himself. This point is ably brought forward by Professor Paul Gaffarel, in his important work, " Les Decouvreurs Fran^ais du XIV me au XVI me Siecle," published at Paris in 1888, and his account may be briefly summarized as follows : Jean Cousin in 1488 sailed from Dieppe, then the great commercial and naval port of France, and bore out to sea to avoid the storms so prevalent in the Bay of Biscay. Arrived at the latitude of the Azores, he was carried westward by a current, and came to an unknown country, near the mouth of an immense river. He took possession of the conti nent, but, as he had not a sufficient crew nor material resources adequate for founding a settle ment, he re-embarked. Instead of returning directly to Dieppe, he took a south-easterly direc tion that is, toward South Africa discovered Cape Agulhas, the southern point of Africa went I 2 4 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. north by the Congo and Guinea, and returned to Dieppe in 1489. Cousin s lieutenant was a Castilian, Pinzon by name, who was jealous of his captain, and caused him considerable trouble on the Gold Coast. On Cousin s complaint, the Admiralty declared him unfit to serve in the marine of Dieppe. Pinzon then retired to Genoa, and afterward to Castile. Every circumstance tends toward the belief that this is the same Pinzon to whom Columbus afterward intrusted the command of the Pinta. . . . We must recollect that Columbus had lost all hope, when he was suddenly accosted by three mariners of Palos, skilled, prudent, and renowned, who became his friends. Were these men inspired by the enthusiasm of Columbus ? Nothing is less likely. Reflection, not passion ; the knowledge of an earlier voyage, not blind con fidence in a single man, decided these cool and cautious navigators. These men were three rela tives, of the name of Pinzon : one of them was Alonzo, doubtless the old lieutenant of Cousin. . . . The conduct of Pinzon throughout seems to indi cate previous acquaintance with the continent. Columbus s son confesses that his father always consulted Alonzo Pinzon in circumstances of diffi culty. He held frequent and long consultations with the latter, both on board his own ship and on the Pinta, and decided nothing without having consulted him. At the trial of the suit between THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 5 Diego Columbus and the Spanish crown, ten witnesses deposed that the admiral asked Pinzon if they were on the right course, and that Pinzon had always answered in the negative until the south westerly direction was taken. Columbus proceeded like a man who only dreamed what he was execut ing, and Pinzon as though he sought a road for merly traversed by him. He was so convinced, so sure of himself, that Columbus ended by listening to him. Soon after they touched at San Sal vador. The Journal of Columbus makes full admission of the part played by Pinzon : " Martin Alonzo Pinzon expressed the opinion that we should do better to sail in a south-westerly direction ; before all else, it was necessary, he said, to reach the terra firma of Asia ; we saw the islands soon after." Pinzon also took a leading part at the discussion with the seamen, and strongly urged the con tinuance of the voyage. It was Pinzon who first announced the sight of land ; and, indeed, Pinzon seems to have been both the good and the evil genius of the voyage, for he delayed, deserted, and endeavoured to anticipate Columbus at every pos sible opportunity. In fact, he behaved to Columbus much as he had behaved to Cousin ; and Colum- bus s son, while he praises his qualities as a seaman, complains bitterly of his malignity and contumacy. Much confusion has been caused in the history 6 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. of the discovery of America by a duplication on the old maps of the eastern portion of Cuba, and the amplifying of the western or false Cuba into a continent, just as the island of Tierra del Fuego, forming the southern side of the Strait of Magellan, was supposed to form part of an immense antarctic continent. The false Cuba has been supposed to be a real representation of a portion of the North American continent namely, Florida and the parts adjacent ; but the name Cuba written upon it gives the key to the error, the real Cuba being known on these maps as Isabella, which name was given to it by the Spaniards, in honour of their queen. The earliest attested discovery of Florida is that by Juan Ponce de Leon, in 1513, although there is a probability that it had been previously found by Sebastian d Ocampo, in 1508. The question of the discovery of North America by Columbus must, then, be answered in the nega tive, and in order to find the true discoverers search must be made among the records of voyages undertaken prior to 1508. The earliest voyages of which any substantial or definite proof can be adduced are those of the Northmen from Iceland and Greenland, resulting in a colonization which lasted from its beginnings in A.D. 1005 until, at all events, A.D. 1347, the year in which we have the last actual intelligence of any voyage between Greenland and Markland, as the nearest of the THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 7 Norse-American colonies was called. This was probably the present Nova Scotia, being, as its name implies, a wooded country. Farther south was Vinland, corresponding to Rhode Island and Massachusetts ; how much more to the southward the Northmen penetrated is not known, but traces of their long-continued presence in the country have been found in the Indian legends collected by the well-known author, Mr. Charles G. Leland, and in other more palpable and tangible remains that have been found in various parts of the New England States. For further details concerning these early voyages, see " The Icelandic Discoverers of America," by Miss Marie A. Brown, now Mrs. Shipley. Between 1274 and 1325 these colonies are spoken of by M. Paul Riant, in his " Expeditions et Pelerinages Scandinaviens," as being affected by the crusading movement in Europe. In 1312 Bishop Arne, of Gardar, preached the Crusades in Iceland, Greenland, and Vinland, and had charge of the appropriation of a tithe of the church revenues for six years, which had been voted by the Church councils at Lyons, Vienna, and Trond- hjem, for the purpose of the Crusades. A ship arriving from Greenland, in 1325, brought the tithes from the American colonies, consisting of 127 pounds of walrus-teeth, which were sold to Jean du Pre, a Flemish merchant, who paid for 8 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. them twelve livres and fourteen sous (Tours standard). These colonies were then well known in Europe, and the place where more especially the records relating to these voyages and events were pre served was Iceland. Here the names of Erik the Red, the colonizer of Greenland, and his valiant sons, Leif the Lucky and Thorvald, his daughter- in-law, Gudrid, and her famous third husband, Thorfmn Karlsefne, were household words, espe cially as some of the most distinguished men in Iceland were descended from the last-named couple. There is little doubt that the accounts of these voyages spread, in a more or less vague form, among the countries which traded with Ice land, and, as Finn Magnusen has shown, English merchants, and more especially those of Bristol, carried on a considerable trade with that island. It is well known that Columbus, in 1477, sailed from Bristol and visited Iceland, and it would be little short of a miracle if the bishop and other learned men with whom he conversed did not relate to him all they knew on this subject, in cluding the fact that, as their records expressed it, " Westward from Spain, over the great sea, which some call Ginnungagap (yawning abyss), there lie lands in the midst which are called, the first one, northward, Vinland the good, the next Markland ; still to the north there are deserts, where the THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 9 Skrselings (Esquimaux) live ; then there are deserts still on to Greenland " (Codex Legati Arnae Mag- nusen, 770) ; and again, " From Greenland to the south lies Helluland, then Markland ; thence it is not far to Vinland, which some think goes on to Africa" (Cod. Leg. A. M., 736). Similar intelligence had probably come to the ears of many merchants and frequenters of the town and port of Bristol, which was then to Eng land what Liverpool is now ; and especially was it known to a certain John Cabot, who had arrived there from Venice, with his family, somewhere about the year 1490. Of him more will be said later, but it must now be remarked that Cabot s voyage was not the first that had been undertaken by the English with the express object of discover ing lands, of which they had heard more or less definitely, across the western sea. Pedro de Ayala writes to the King and Queen of Spain, on the 25th of July, 1498: "The people of Bristol have for seven years since sent every year two, three, or four caravels in search of the isle of Brasil and the seven cities, according to the notions of this Genoese. " William of Worcester mentions a voyage of Thomas Lloyd, to whom a patent was granted in 1480, and who commanded a ship equipped by John Jay of Bristol, but returned after seven months without having landed. The first of these mariners from Bristol to find io THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. the long-sought western lands was John Cabot, with his sons Louis, Sebastian, and Sancho. The nationality of these important personages is un certain, but the probability is that John, the father, was a Genoese by birth ; that is, that he was born at the village of Castiglione, within the confines of the republic of Genoa. It is certain, from entries found by the late Rawdon Brown in the archives of Venice, that the privilege of Venetian citizenship was conferred on him on the 28th of March, 1476, in consequence of his having resided there for fifteen years, which was the legal qualification of an alien for citizenship. It is practically certain, also, that Sebastian was born before this period ; and that when the latter was " almost a child," yet having some knowledge of "humanities and the sphere," his father brought him to England. The probability is that he was born about 1473 or 1474, and came to England about 1490. The patent under which their first voyage was made was dated the 5th of March, in the eleventh year of Henry VII. (1496). The patentees (John Cabot and his sons Louis, Sebastian, and Sancho) were authorized to sail under the English flag, with five ships, at their own charges, to discover islands, countries, etc., hitherto unknown to Christians ; to set up the royal banners, occupy and possess the countries ; to pay one-fifth part of the profits to the king, and always to return to the port of Bristol ; THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA, u to bring their goods and merchandise into the country free of customs, and to have the exclusive right of trading with the countries they might dis cover ; and all the king s subjects are charged to render them help and assistance. The first expedition sailed from Bristol in the beginning of May, 1497, in a ship called the Matthew. On the 24th of June, in the morning, they discovered land, and on the same day they found an island, which they named S. Juan, be cause it was discovered on St. John s Day. The map preserved in the Bibliotheque Nationale at Paris, the only direct record we have which pur ports to come from the hand of Sebastian Cabot, affords the above information, and calls the land first seen Prima terra vista. It marks this land at the northern extremity of Nova Scotia, or of Cape Breton Island, which is not separated from the mainland; S. Juan is marked in a position cor responding to that of Prince Edward Island. But as this is hardly likely to have been the first land fall after a voyage from England, and as the next record we have is that they coasted north or north west, until they were stopped by the ice, it is very much more likely that the northern point of New foundland was the locality of the landfall, and that the island called S. Juan was Belle Isle, which could easily have been discovered on the same day as Cape Bauld, even by a vessel which had 12 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. made the voyage out from Bristol at the rate of about forty-five miles a day. The further direction of the voyage is reported with a variety of detail by those who profess to have had it from Cabot. They agree, however, that he went north-west along the coast : " But after some days," says Ramusio, speak ing as though quoting Cabot, " I found that the land prolonged itself toward the tramontane (north), which displeased me infinitely. I coasted, never theless, in the hope of finding a gulf into which I could turn. I found none ; but I remarked that the land continued as far as 56 under our pole. Seeing that in this place the coast inclined toward the east, and despairing of finding a passage, I re turned on my route in order to reconnoitre anew the said coast in the direction of the equator, always with the intention of finding a passage to go to the Indies, and I arrived at the part to-day called Florida." Other accounts speak of vast heaps of ice, which caused him to turn southward until he came nearly to the latitude of the Straits of Gibraltar, and " circling to the west until the Isle of Cuba was on his left, and nearly in the same longitude " (account by Peter Martyr). These accounts allowing for errors, and re membering that latitude could be determined with approximate certainty, while longitude could only be imperfectly stated may be taken to mean that the Cabots, having discovered Newfoundland, Belle THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 13 Isle, and Labrador, coasted along the latter until they came to the place, in about 56 north latitude, where the coast turns, not eastward, but in that direction relatively to its former course. From a general north-westerly direction, Cabot would here find himself obliged to steer almost due north in order to follow the coast of Labrador. This turn to the right, or east, of his former course, " dis pleased him infinitely," and, taken in conjunction with the " vast heaps of ice," determined him to return and seek a more southerly passage to Cathay (China), which, according to Ramusio, was the object of his search. Either on this voyage, or on a subsequent one, he coasted southward to the lati tude of the Straits of Gibraltar, which would bring him nearly to Cape Hatteras, and therefore into that part of America which, at the time Ramusio wrote, was vaguely and loosely known as Florida. He would then be in the longitude of the eastern portion of Cuba, which extends eastward of west longitude 75, while Cape Hatteras and Chesapeake Bay are to the west of that meridian. From the short time that Cabot had for these extensions of his voyage, it seems more likely that this southward exploration was not undertaken during his first voyage. He was back in London the last week in August, and if his progress during the other portions of his voyage was not more rapid than while crossing the Atlantic outward-bound, he 14 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. must have had little more than time for his coasting voyage to latitude 56 north, and his return by way of Newfoundland. His reception in England was highly flattering. To sum it up in the words of Pasqualigo, a Vene tian merchant : " The news of his discoveries of the Isle of Brazil, the seven cities, and the kingdom of the Grand Khan, produced a remarkable impres sion. Calbot bore the title of Admiral. They rendered him great honours : he was clothed in silk, and the English ran after him like madmen." Perhaps this title of admiral supplies the missing clue as to why, in the ambiguous inscription on Sebastian Cabot s portrait, either he or his father is described as miles. Another contemporary, Raymondo de Soncino, writing to the Duke of Milan, December 18, 1497, says : " This Master John (Cabotto) hath the de scription of the world in a chart, and also in a solid globe which he made, and he shows where he landed. . . . And they affirm that the sea is covered with fishes, which are caught not only with the net, but with baskets, a stone being tied to them in order that the baskets may sink in the water, and this I heard the said Master John relate, and the aforesaid Englishmen, his comrades, say they will bring so many fishes that this kingdom will no longer have need of Iceland, from which country there comes a very great store of fish which are THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 15 called stock-fish." Here we have incidental confir mation of the English trade with Iceland. If more were needed, we have it in an old map of Iceland, dated 1539, in which ships labelled Bremen, Angli, Scoti, and Hamburg, are seen in the ocean off the coast of the island. The map is printed in the first volume of Justin Winsor s " Narrative and Critical History of America," along with an im mense mass of undigested information, out of which the reader is left to pick his own conclusions as best he can. After Cabot s return from this voyage, he received from Henry VII. a gift of ten pounds and an annuity of twenty pounds sterling, payable half- yearly out of the customs of the port of Bristol. (Order dated December 13, 1497, sealed January 28, 1498). On the 3rd of February, 1498, a second patent was granted to John Cabot only, allowing him to take six English ships, of 200 tons burden or under, to convey and lead them " to the land and isles of late found by the said John in our name and by our commandment." This patent was found in the Rolls Chapel by Mr. Biddle (" Memoir of Sebastian Cabot," 1831). The result of this voyage is not fully known. Cabot s papers are, it is feared, irrecoverably lost, having been last heard of as being in the hands of a certain William Worthington, who in 1557, under Philip and Mary, was associated with Sebastian 16 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. Cabot in the pension previously held by the latter alone. In Hakluyt s earlier work (1582) he says that Worthington was willing to have them pub lished ; but in his more complete " Principal Navi gations " (1598-1600) he complains that he is unable to get a sight of them. The inference is that they were no longer in Worthington s pos session, and to this we shall return later. The evidences we have as to the second voyage are reports of Sebastian Cabot s conversations with his friends, and a letter quoted by Ramusio, in which he speaks of " having sailed a long time west and by north, beyond those islands, unto the latitude of 67 degrees and a half under the North Pole, and at the eleventh day of June, finding still the open sea without any manner of impediment, he thought verily by that way to have passed on still the way to Cathaia, which is in the East, and would have done it if the mutiny of the shipmaster and mariners had not hindered him and caused him to return homewards from that place " (Hak- luyt, vol. Hi.). Sir Humphrey Gilbert, Lord Bacon, and Hakluyt in his " Discourse on Western Plant ing," all name 67 or 67 J as the northern limit of Cabot s voyages. This would bring him to what is now called Cumberland Island, and in making this voyage he must have passed Hudson Strait. This strait is not shown in the Paris Cabot map of 1544, but it is mentioned by R. Willes, in a tract reprinted THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 17 in Hakluyt, as being shown on the copy then pre served at Chenies, the property of the Earl of Bedford, which places the strait between 61 and 64 north latitude, the true position being about 61 north latitude. It seems probable that Sebas tian Cabot found this opening, and was unable at that time to explore it further, but reserved the knowledge for future use. After this voyage he appears to have gone to Spain, giving as his reason the great tumults in England, " and preparations for wars in Scotland, by reason whereof there was no more consideration had to this voyage " (Ramusio, quoted by Hakluyt). Here he probably met with Juan de la Cosa, who, on a map dated 1500, has placed the words Mar descubierta por Inglesi (sea discovered by the English) and several names along the coast, among which are Cape Ynglaterra and Cape S. Johan. This information must have been derived either directly or indirectly from Cabot himself. In 1512 Sebastian Cabot took service with Ferdinand of Spain, and in 1518 he was made Piloto Mayor by Charles V., with the duty of examining all pilots leaving Spain for the Indies, as to their fitness for the work. In 1524 he at tended the conference at Badajoz for determining the longitude of the Moluccas, and gave evidence as an expert along with Estevan Gomez, Nunez Garcia, and Diego Ribero, all of whom were 2 1 8 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. ordered to produce their maps, globes, and instru ments for deciding the matter in question, which was, whether the Moluccas were east or west of the line drawn by Pope Alexander VI., and subse quently altered by the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494, by virtue of which the discoveries in one- half of the globe were to belong to Spain and those in the other to Portugal." The appointment of Cabot to attend this conference places him among the four most learned geographers of the day, and emphasizes the high regard in which he was held in Spain. Previous to this, in 1522, he had made overtures to the Venetians for the trans fer of his services to the republic, which he claimed as his native land, saying that he could show them a way of great profit which he had discovered. But these negotiations came to nothing, although the correspondence seems to have been kept up for many years. In 1547 he was sent for "to serve and inhabit in England," and a pension was granted him by Edward VI., together with the rank of Grand Pilot of England. In 1549, the emperor sent for him to return to Spain, but he refused to do so; and a similar answer was returned to a further demand after the accession of Mary. In 1553. and again in 1555, companies were chartered to open up, if possible, a north-east passage to * See note on the early maps of America, appended to Chap. IV. THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 19 China, and Cabot was made governor for life of those companies. He did not, however, sail in these expeditions, but made his last appearance in public, being now over eighty years of age, at an inspection and farewell banquet held on the occasion of the departure of the Searchthrift on the second of these expeditions in 1556. He is said to have died in 1557, in which year an event occurred that has been already alluded to, and that is not without a certain significance in regard to the almost entire absence of direct memorials of his voyages. As has been remarked, a pension of ;i66 135. 4d. was granted him by Edward VI., to date from Michaelmas, 1548. In 1550 the pension granted by Henry VII. was renewed, and a further renewal or confirmation was granted by Mary. In 1557 Cabot was induced, we do not know under what pretext, to resign his pension, and two days later (May 29) a new grant was made to him and William Worthington jointly. This was during the reign of a Roman Catholic queen, who was married to a Spanish king ; and when we remember that Sebastian Cabot had been in great request in Spain, and had been twice sent for by the emperor, Charles V., and had refused to return ; also, that he was supposed to be in possession of information as to a passage to China, which he considered of great value : considering all this, we 2 2 20 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. cannot wonder if Philip of Spain used all his in fluence to get hold of his maps and papers. After Cabot s death they certainly came into the hands of Worthington, as related by Hakluyt ; and as certainly Worthington never produced them, though repeatedly urged to do so, and though he had in the first instance declared himself "very willing to suffer them to be overseen, and pub lished in as good order as may be, to the en couragement and benefit of our countrymen " (Hakluyt, 1582). This suppression of "all his (Cabot s) own maps and discourses, drawn and written by himself," looks, on the face of it, very much as if the King of Spain had used his position as husband of the Queen of England to obtain Cabot s papers, which must have fallen into Worthington s hands immediately on the death of the Grand Pilot. Spain had from the first worked against the English discovery, and tried to turn Henry VII. off from the matter. In the tran scripts from the Spanish archives relating to Eng land, there is a letter from Ferdinand and Isabella to Dr. de Puebla, their representative in England, dated March 28, 1496, which contains the following significant passage : " You write that a person like Columbus has come to England for the purpose of persuading the king to enter into an undertaking similar to that of the Indies, without prejudice to Spain and Portugal. He is quite at liberty. But THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 21 we believe that this undertaking was thrown in the way of the King of England by the King of France, with the premeditated intention of distract ing him from his other business. Take care that the King of England be not deceived in this or in any other matter. The French will try as hard as they can to lead him into such undertakings, but they are very uncertain enterprises, and must not be gone into at present. Besides, they cannot be executed without prejudice to us and to the King of Portugal." This last remark no doubt refers to the cele brated line of demarcation drawn by the pope, and finally settled by the Treaty of Tordesillas, by which all lands discovered west of a line drawn 370 leagues west of the Azores were to belong to Spain, and those east of that line to Portugal. The prolongation of this line on the other side of the globe was also to form a boundary between the possessions of the two countries, and in the then uncertain state of all calculations of longitude, it was not easy to say what lands lay on the Spanish side of this line and what on the Portuguese side. The Portuguese, for instance, who claimed Brazil, as being on their own side of this line, made the same claim with regard to the lands discovered by Cabot. They accordingly sent Cortereal to take possession of them in the name of Portugal ; but his expedition came to an unfortunate end, and 22 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. little was accomplished. The Portuguese kept up their claim by marking on their maps the name Terra Corterealis or Terra de Cortereal, above which they placed Terra de Lavorador de Rey de Portugal^ and above that again, far away to the northward, Terra de los Ing res (English). The emphatic marking twice over on the Cabot map of 1544 of Prima terra vista, and claiming it as a portion of the mainland, together with the note describing the discovery, seem to have been in tended by way of counter-claim to the Portuguese claims on behalf of Cortereal. Another voyager whose alleged discoveries are marked on these early maps was Estevan Gomez, whom we have mentioned as one of the Spanish experts at the conference at Badajoz, and who in 1525 made a voyage along the coast of the United States, but does not appear to have got farther north than 42 J, or near Cape Ann, to the north of Boston. The only important disputant of the claims of Cabot appears then to be Cortereal, and his name is regularly placed against the coasts of Labrador and Newfoundland on the Portuguese maps, while the Spanish and English maps name the English as the discoverers of those lands. A Latin note on a Portuguese map summarizes the voyages of Cortereal : " This land Caspar Cortereal, a Portu guese, first discovered, and took away with him savage men and white bears. In it is a very great THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 23 multitude of animals and birds, also fishes. The next year he suffered shipwreck, and never re turned. The same thing happened in the following year to his brother Michael." The name Labrador is said to have been derived from this circumstance of slaves (labourers) having been taken there. Others say that it was a "labourer," or slave, taken on board at the Azores, who first saw the land, which was therefore called " Labourer s land." These voyages of Cortereal in 1500 and 1501, however, cannot be regarded as serious rivals to that of Cabot, since they were evidently only under taken in order to claim these lands, already dis covered, on behalf of Portugal. The English claim was recognised in Spain even as early as 1500, since Cosa in that year inscribed on his celebrated map the words " Sea discovered by the English." The Spaniards were able to take an un prejudiced view of the matter, because these lands were at that time believed to be within the Portu guese hemisphere as defined at Tordesillas. And here it must be remarked that the claims of Spain and Portugal to all new discoveries, each country having a hemisphere to itself, left no room for other nations to make discoveries for their own advantage, or even to make voyages to the lands already dis covered. Whatever was done, had to be done in a furtive way, and at great risk. Speaking of the French voyages in these waters, Professor Gaffarel 24 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. says: "As none of them were ignorant of the dangers to which they exposed themselves in thus braving the power of Spain, they prudently kept the secret of their operations, and the silence of contemporaries on the subject of these voyages to Central America may thus be explained " (Gaffarel, " Jean Ango "). From another part of the same book we take the following passage : " Spanish and Portuguese exercised a jealous and careful surveil lance over all ships, of whatever country, and woe to the imprudent stranger who allowed himself to be surprised by them ! He was considered as a pirate, and treated without pity." The French, and especially the Bretons, were in reality the only rivals of the English in the region of the Baccalaos, as the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the adjacent lands were called, from the abundance of codfish that were taken there. The first voyages of the Cabots were followed in 1501 and 1502 by expeditions, probably abortive, or, at any rate, with out striking results, undertaken by Englishmen, in conjunction with Portuguese from the Azores. In 1503 Sebastian Cabot is believed to have under taken a third voyage, when he brought home three savages ; and a record has been found of the pay ment of one pound to a man that brought hawks from the new isle. In 1504 two pounds were paid "to a preste that goeth to the new llande," and in 1504-6 we find the first authenticated voyages of THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 25 the Bretons and Normans. From 1506 we find a tolerably regular series of voyages, until, in 1527, John Rut, an Englishman, found in St. John s Bay nearly fifty ships, English, French, and Portuguese ; while in 1543-45, during the months of January and February, at least two ships every day left the ports of Normandy alone for these regions. Into the later history of these rich fisheries, and the quarrels they have occasioned, it is not our province to enter. In 1534, and again in 1535, 1541, and 1543, Jacques Cartier made voyages of exploration and partial settlement along the St. Lawrence, which may be said to have been the precursors, although not the real commencement, of the French occupa tion of those regions. What especially strikes us in reading the history of all these voyages, and in studying the maps to which they gave rise, is, that with the exception of one or two instances, about which opinion is much divided, such as the explorations of Verrazano in 1523-24, and the alleged voyage of Thevet in 1555-56, the communication with North and Central America seems to have followed with almost invariable persistency one or other of two well-marked routes, viz., the Spanish route to the West Indies and the English route to Newfound land. Between New York and Florida the coast seems hardly to have been known. The earliest 26 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. maps, up to about 1520, leave its very existence in uncertainty, and for many years after the voyages of Verrazano in 1523-24, and Gomez in 1525, who were the first to traverse and describe the coast, the maps made no indication of the long stretch of coast-line between New York and Florida. The state of European knowledge regarding the American continent was still very unsatisfactory, when in 1584 Richard Hakluyt wrote his famous " Discourse on Western Planting," which has been published by the Maine Historical Society. In 1583 Sir Humphrey Gilbert sailed on his ill-fated voyage, as recorded in Hakluyt. The accounts of this voyage are interesting for the descriptions they give of Newfoundland at that period ; but although, as one of the accounts tells us, the voyage was taken partly in order to search for the northern El Dorado, Norumbega, yet, owing to its disastrous ending, the expedition got no farther than the coasts of Newfoundland. The first real attempt at a colonization of United States territory was that of Sir Walter Raleigh in Virginia. So little was known of the character of this part of the coast that the report of the two captains, Amadas and Barlow, sent out by him, came like the discovery of a new country, although this was in 1584, nearly a century after the first voyages along the two main routes above indicated. The first colonists, in 1585, had to be taken off again in 1586, and, other private THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 27 attempts being also failures, the Plymouth and London (North and South) Virginia Companies were formed. The former extended from Long Island Sound to Maine, and on the dissolution of the company, in 1620, the Pilgrim Fathers made their well-known settlement in New England, having, curiously enough, taken their leave of the Old World at the very port which had given its name to the company on whose abandoned territories they now landed. It is not our purpose to trace out the history of colonization in America. Enough has been said to show that it is to the northern line of route first discovered by the Northmen of Iceland and Green land, and recovered in the fifteenth century by John and Sebastian Cabot (who on their first voyage may probably have taken the old route by way of Iceland, as Hudson did at a later date) it is to this route and to those who followed it that we must refer the settlement of the United States of to-day. French, Dutch, and Swedes, as well as English, all used this route ; but the English became at last the dominant race in the country, and it was men of English birth, or English de scent, who, in 1776, took into their own hands the government of their own country. Quite different has been the part played by Spain in the New World. Without entering into the history of the atrocities committed in other 28 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. parts of America, we here confine ourselves to denying that Spain took any considerable or use ful share in the founding of the United States. A settlement in Florida, which was ceded to Eng land, in exchange for Havana, in 1753, the latter place having been captured during the war, and a line of missions and other settlements along the Pacific coast these were the chief claims that could be made by Spain to anything like a share in the honour of having helped to found or form the present nation. And these amount to virtually nothing. The honour is due, not to the proud and selfish Spanish grandees so ably drawn by Kingsley in his immortal " Westward Ho !" but rather to the Cabots, to the Drakes, Grenvilles, and Raleighs, who braved the power of Spain and defeated her hugest armadas, thereby arresting, in its full career and in the height of its power, a double tyranny of Church and State, which, had it been allowed to hold its course unchecked, would infallibly have strangled, in its earliest infancy, the civilization and freedom of which America now so loudly boasts. When the mines and treasure-houses of Aztecs and Incas had been exhausted, when the last Indian had succumbed to the white man s fetters or the white man s faith, what would have been the condition of the country, under a purely Spanish rule ? The national condi tions and resources at present realized in the THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. 29 United States would not have been in existence. So far from being due to the triumph of Columbus and of Spain, they signalize the defeat of both. The degree of civilization at present existing in Central and Southern America is due, almost entirely, to the same progressive forces working indirectly through the medium of the United States and other advanced Powers, not to any virtue of their mother country. It is through the northern route across the Atlantic that the North American continent has received the means and the power to show such evidences of culture and civilization as will be set forth at Chicago in 1^93, and their collection and exhibition may well serve as a fitting reminder to all mankind that Spain, at all events, did not either find or found the nation. JOHN B. SHIPLEY. CHAPTER II. LEIF ERIKSON. Miss Marie A. Brown s Plea before the Select Committee of the United States Senate on the Centennial of the Consti tution and the Discovery of America, for recognition of the Discovery of America by Leif Erikson, A.D. 1000. IN the commemoration of what is strictly a his torical event, the strictest conformity to historical truth is of imperative necessity ; a nation cannot be justified in having any other motive for such an act. Patriotism, sentiment, hero worship, the idealizing of any person connected with the event to be commemorated, are also only justified when in the strictest conformity to historical truth. This American Republic is contemplating an act of the gravest import, the celebration of the greatest achievement in its history, the discovery of this continent. Just at the very moment the achievement is ascribed to a certain man, and fixed at a certain date, historical facts declare that the man in question was not the discoverer of this country, that the date is five hundred years too LEIF ERIKSON. 31 late, and that the honour must if the nation values its integrity or acknowledges fealty to the truth the honour must be given to the predecessor, to the discoverer, and not to his follower or imitator, the man who profited by his discovery. I stand before you, gentlemen, as the spokes man of this historical fact, knowing that this fact cannot but be respected by this nation, and duly observed in its every act. When I enunciate this historical fact, it is not my voice alone that does it ; it is the united voice of the nations of the Scandinavian North ; it is the united voice of the Scandinavians of the United States, who, were this fact recognised by the nation they have adopted, would at once be transformed from aliens into compatriots, sharing our pride in a common ancestry ; it is the united voice of Great Britain, Germany, France ; it is the voice of all the learned societies of Europe ; it is the voice of Iceland, uttered through her archives, through the proud consciousness of every man and woman born to that island for nearly a thousand years, through the many volumes of ancient Icelandic manuscripts preserved in the libraries of Copen hagen, Stockholm, and Christiania ; through the tomes upon tomes of ecclesiastical records, the annals of the administrations of the Church of Rome in Greenland for six centuries, and in Vinland for probably a correspondingly long 32 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. period, that lie buried in the libraries of the Eternal City. A brief of Pope Nicholas V., dated September 20, 1448, stating that the Icelandic inhabitants of Greenland had been Christians for six hundred years, and had erected many sacred buildings and a splendid cathedral there, was found some years ago in the Vatican by Professor Mallet, of Geneva. Other Pope s bulls have been discovered relating to ecclesiastical affairs in Greenland. The Pilot, at the time of the unveiling of the Leif Erikson statue in Boston, contained an editorial in which it was said that : " From the Catholic Church s eighteen centuries of unbroken records the advocates of the Norse man s right to priority among American discoverers have drawn the strongest evidence in proof of their claim ; for here are noted the names and deeds of the missionaries who followed the sea-kings to the New World." Father Bodfish, of the cathedral in Boston, in his paper read a year ago before the Bostonian Society, on the discovery of America by the North men, is reported to have quoted " as corrobora tive authority the account given in standard history of the Catholic Church of the establishment of a bishopric in Greenland in 1112 A.D., and he added the interesting suggestion that, as it is the duty of a bishop so placed at a distance to report from time LEIF ERIKSON. 33 to time to the Pope, not only on ecclesiastical matters, but of the geography of the country and character of the people, it is probable that Columbus had the benefit of the knowledge possessed at Rome thus derived. It is [he said] stated in different biographies of Columbus that, when the voyage was first proposed by him, he found difficulty in getting Spanish sailors to go with him in so doubtful an undertaking. After Colum bus returned from a visit to Rome with information there obtained, these sailors, or enough of them, appear to have had their doubts or fears removed, and no difficulty in enlistment was experienced." The reverend superior of St. Benedict s Indus trial School at Skidaway Island, Savannah, Father Oswald Moosmiiller, has informed me, in two private letters, dated September i and 3 of last year, that he has written a book entitled " Euro peans in America before Columbus," and that he collected materials for this book in Rome about twenty years ago. To quote his own words : " Although the best libraries of the past, i.e., the Bibliotheca Angelica, in charge of the Augustinians, and the Bibliotheca Cassanathense, at the Minerva, in charge of the Dominicans, have since been broken up and dispersed, yet other sources of the greatest value for a historian have been made accessible of late, viz., the archives of the Vatican, which at my time were in charge of the aged ora- 3 34 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. torian Dr. Theiner, as custodian. There is the place where you can procure authentic data and the most interesting documents concerning the bishops of Ireland and Greenland." In this book there is an especial chapter relating to Columbus, headed : " Christopher Columbus confers with Bishop Magnus, of Skalholt, the former Abbot of Helgafell, in the year 1477." This is so important that I must quote it. He says : " In the archives of Iceland are found authentic records which testify that Columbus arrived from England in a Bristol merchant-ship, and landed in the harbour of Hvalfjardareyri, in the southern part of Iceland, in February of the year 1477. This harbour used at that time to be frequently visited by foreign traders, especially from England and Ireland. Columbus himself says that in the before- named year, the sea that washes round the island (which nearly approaches England in size) was quite free from ice. Voyages to Iceland at this time of the year are not altogether unusual, but the entire absence of snow is very rare. But it is cor roborated by the public records of Iceland that this actually occurred in the months of February and March in the year 1477. In this way a remarkable coincidence occurred. " At that time one of the most prominent per sonages among the clergy of Iceland was the Bene dictine Magnus, son of Egolf, who in the year 1470 LEIF ERIKSON. 35 was nominated abbot of the monastery of Helga- fell. Helgafell might, in respect to the earliest voyages of discovery of the Icelanders to America, be called classic ground, for out of this very neighbourhood had set forth the first discoverers and colonists of Greenland and other parts of America. . . . " In the year 1475 Magnus, abbot of the Bene dictine monastery of Helgafell, was consecrated Bishop of Skalholt by Archbishop Gauto, of Dron- theim. In the winter of the year 1477 it now hap pened that Bishop Magnus visited the churches of his diocese on the peninsula of Hvalfjardareyri at the very time when Christopher Columbus landed in the haven of the same name. The bishop met with Columbus, and they conversed in the Latin language. Columbus inquired concerning the wes tern lands " (as Rafn, in the preface to the " Anti- quitates Americans, " p. xxiv., note i, says " . . .to him, inquiring concerning western lands . . ."). " But what information thereupon and, generally, what answer Bishop Magnus gave Columbus, remains still a matter of hypothesis, upon which nothing has yet been found in authentic writings. To be sure, there are several grounds that permit us to accept the theory that Bishop Magnus related to Columbus all about the well-known discoveries of the western lands by the Icelanders, since there can be no doubt that the bishop himself had ade- 32 36 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. quate knowledge of these discoveries ; for they not only formed a part of the history of his fatherland, but also belonged to the oral traditions of the inhabitants of Helgafell, and, moreover, were pre served in the written chronicles of the monastery of which he had been abbot. . . . " It would be superfluous again to point out that the knowledge of the existence of western lands, and consequently of America, was in no wise confined to Iceland." This author makes another statement of direct practical value to us. He says : " For the elucidation of these voyages to un known lands in these remote times, there is placed at the disposal of the historian a proportionately rich source of material. A series of parchment manuscripts remains extant in which more or less mention of America occurs, evidently under the names used by the Icelanders. Also a quantity of paper manuscripts, which, however, mostly con tain only accounts from old parchment documents at present lost, should not remain unregarded." It is to search these buried records in Rome, the annals of six hundred years of American history, that I ask the support and aid of the Government of the United States. It is not to authorize or aid the researches of a private in dividual in an abstruse subject of little or no prac tical importance ; it is not to substantiate a vague LEIF ERlKSON. 37 theory or tradition or discovery ; it is not to prove the fact that America was discovered by Leif Erik- son, the Icelander, in the year 1000, for that is already proved ; but to collect and put into the possession of the United States, for preservation in its archives, all the evidence of this discovery, accumulated for centuries in Rome through the ecclesiastical interests, that made such annals and reports of the first importance to the Church. These annals comprise the parish life of the Vin- land colonies, founded in the year 1000, the re ports of the several bishops, which, as Father Bodfish has asserted, not only treated of ecclesi astical matters, but "of the geography of the country and character of the people." It is not right that this nation should lack the evidence, the full accounts, of the events in its own early history, especially when these are in possession of the different countries of Europe, giving the people of the Old World a knowledge of the Icelandic discovery and settlement of America not as yet attained by Americans themselves. I therefore petition Congress to grant me an appropriation adequate to the accomplishment of this grand object, which I pledge myself to under take and carry through, with the able assistance of an English friend of mine, Mr. John B. Shipley, of London, a gentleman admirably qualified for the work, and as well versed in the subject as I 38 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. am myself. The labour of the search, of decipher ing and transcribing manuscripts, and of preparing documents for publication by the Government, is obviously too great for me to perform entirely alone and unaided ; and as Mr. Shipley has been associated with me in my entire work this season to effect recognition of the Icelandic discovery, he is the proper person to assist me in the investiga tion in Rome, and in the preparations for the proposed Viking exhibition the erection of the Viking hall, the collecting of relics and antiquities for exhibition from the various museums of Europe, etc. But for the co-operation of such a friend as Mr. Shipley, who holds the same views as myself on the subject, and understands the con ditions and requirements abroad, thus being able to facilitate my negotiations in foreign countries, I could not carry out my plan. Mr. Shipley is now in London, and will join me at an early date. It has been sufficiently demonstrated that the heads of the Church in Rome knew of the Ice landic discovery of America at the time, the date of the discovery, the year 1000, having been the exact date of the conversion of the entire Scandi navian North to Christianity ; and that the Catholic Church, the only Church then, was quick to profit by this discovery, and establish its own institutions in the new colonies across the ocean. Rome being possessed of these facts, Columbus, a devoted son LEIF ERIKSON. 39 of the Church, could not have failed to be. The knowledge he obtained in Rome he verified in Iceland, during his visit there in 1477. The famous French geographer, Malte-Brun, states in his " History of Geography " that " Columbus, when in Italy, had heard of the Norse discoveries beyond Iceland, for Rome was the world s centre, and all information of importance was sent there." It is known also that Gudrid, the wife of Thorfinn Karlsefne, the principal colonist of Vinland (the present Massachusetts and Rhode Island "), made a pilgrimage to Rome, in about 1028 or 1030, and told the holy fathers all about her three years stay in Vinland. Gabriel Gravier, in his able work, " The Discovery of America by the Northmen," says of this visit of Gudrid s : "It is related that she was well received, and she certainly must have talked there of her ever- memorable transoceanic voyage to Vinland and her three years residence there. Rome paid much attention to geographical discoveries, and took pains to collect all new charts and reports that were brought there. Every new discovery was an aggrandizement of the papal dominion a new field for the preaching of the Gospel." " Every new discovery was an aggrandizement of the papal dominion" In these words we have the * These localities are fixed by Humboldt in the second volume of the " Cosmos," also by Rafn. 40 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. secret of Columbus s operations. The Church having full knowledge of the existence of the western continent, discovered by men of a race that the Church had no intention of glorifying, and Columbus being an obedient tool of that Church, the means were at command for effecting a re discovery of that continent, and for obtaining for the Church and its minion all the glory of a vast original achievement ! So Columbus was despatched to Iceland and put into communication with a bishop belonging to the Order of Benedictines, the same order who, accord ing to Father Moosmiiller, had effected the conver sion of the entire Scandinavian North to Christianity, Ansgarius, the first Apostle to the North, having been a Benedictine, as were also several of the bishops of Iceland. This Bishop Magnus, with whom Columbus conversed in the Latin language, had, as we have seen, the records of the Icelandic discovery of America in his own monastery. The learned Icelander, Finn Magnusen, who according to the testimony of Chambers s " Encyclopaedia," and other authorities, " has conclusively established the fact that Columbus did visit Iceland in 1477, fifteen years before he undertook his great expedi tion across the Atlantic," calls attention to a remark able coincidence, which is this : " Magnus Eiolfson was Bishop of Skalholt, in Iceland ; since 1470 he had been abbot of the LEIF ERIKSON. 41 monastery of Helgafell, the place where the oldest documents relating to Greenland, Vinland, and the various parts of America discovered by the North men had been written, and where they were doubt less carefully preserved, as it was from this very district that the most distinguished voyagers had gone forth. These documents must have been well known to Bishop Magnus, as were their general contents throughout the island, and it is therefore in the highest degree improbable that Columbus, whose mind had been filled with the idea of ex ploring a western continent since the year 1474, should have omitted to seek for and receive infor mation respecting these early voyages." This same author, Finn Magnusen, in his article in the " Nordisk Tidskrift," which established the fact of Columbus s visit to Iceland, writes further more : " The English trade with Iceland certainly merits the consideration of historians, if it furnished Colum bus with the opportunity of visiting that island, there to be informed of the historical evidence re specting the existence of important lands and a large continent in the west. If Columbus should have acquired a knowledge of the accounts trans mitted to us of the discoveries of the Northmen in conversations held in Latin with the Bishop of Skalholt and the learned men of Iceland, we may the more readily conceive his firm belief in the 42 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. possibility of rediscovering a western continent, and his unwearied zeal in putting his plans in execution. The discovery of America, so momen tous in its results, may therefore be regarded as the mediate consequence of its previous discovery by the Scandinavians, which may be thus placed among the most important events of former ages." The testimony of Bayard Taylor, in his descrip tion of Iceland, is also important. His words are : " It is impossible that the knowledge of these voyages should not have been current in Iceland in 1477, when Columbus, sailing in a ship from Bristol, England, visited the island. As he was able to converse with the priests and learned men in Latin, he undoubtedly learned of the existence of another continent to the west and south ; and this knowledge not the mere fanaticism of a vague belief supported him during many years of dis appointment." A writer in the Foreign Quarterly Review asks very pertinently : " But what could be more to his purpose, or better adapted to his views, than the fact that the Northmen, the boldest of navigators, had know ledge of a land in the west which they supposed to extend far southwards till it met Africa ? Or could not the intelligent Genoese find some suggestion in the following more accurate statement of an Ice landic geographer : On the west of the great sea LEIF ERIKSON. 43 of Spain, which some call Ginnungagap, and lean ing somewhat towards the north, the first land that occurs is the good Vinland ? " That Columbus fully expected to find a conti nent, and knew with absolute certainty that such existed from the evidence of the Icelandic discovery that he had seen both in Rome and Iceland, is proved by the terms of his compact with the King and Queen of Spain : (1) "He wishes to be made admiral of the seas and countries which he is about to discover. He desires to hold this dignity during his life, and that it should descend to his heirs. (2) " Christopher Columbus wishes to be made viceroy of all the continents and islands. (3) " He wishes to have a share, amounting to a tenth part, of the profits of all merchandise, be it pearls, jewels, or any other things that may be found, gained, bought, or exported from the countries which he is to discover," and other clauses of similar import. In the various petitions to the Spanish sovereigns made by Columbus and his patrons his patrons being men high in the Catholic Church, not scientists the inducements held out were never those of accomplishing a great discovery, of ex ploring and opening up new territory for civilization and development ; but, on the contrary, the only incentive that was used to kindle the royal zeal was 44 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. expressed in the words of Luis de St. Angel in his well-known appeal to Queen Isabella : "He re minded her of how much might be done for the glory of God, the exaltation of the Church, and the extension of her own power and dominion." If we turn to Columbus s own views on the subject, and motives, as expressed in his letters, we find the same thing : " I gave to the subject [he writes] six or seven years of great anxiety, explaining to the best of my ability how great service might be done to our Lord by this undertaking, in promulgating His sacred name and our holy faith among so many nations ; an enterprise so exalted in itself, and so calculated to enhance the glory and immortalize the renown of great sovereigns." J. J. Barry, one of Columbus s Roman Catholic biographers, states distinctly that " the first object of the discovery, disengaged from every human consideration, was, therefore, the glorification of the Redeemer and the extension of His Church." He adds naively : " Historians have hitherto left this circumstance unnoticed, or in a state of vague confusion." But I will endeavour to repair this omission, though from a very different motive than actuated Barry, by calling the attention of this whole nation to the fact that Columbus s enterprise was simply and solely a missionary undertaking on a %rand scale, under the patronage of the Spanish LEIF ERIKSON. 45 sovereigns and the Church of Rome. Barry gives repeated confirmation to this, for in alluding to the famous bull of Pope Alexander VI., he says : "And here we see visibly the participation of the Church in the discovery." He adds : " All the sympathies of the Holy Father and of the Sacred College were in favour of Columbus." Rossely de Lorgues, another Catholic biographer of Columbus, affirms that " Columbus did not owe his great celebrity to his genius or science, but only to his vocation, to his faith, and to the Divine grace." This author shows that the real aim of Christopher Columbus was a ransom of the Holy Sepulchre by means of the riches to be found in the new region. All the evidence, accordingly, goes to show that the motive of Columbus, of all his ecclesi astical patrons, Juan Perez, Deza (who was the successor of the infamous inquisitor-general, Tor- quemada), the Grand Cardinal Mendoza, Luis de St. Angel, Ferdinand and Isabella, was simply and solely papal aggrandizement, the gaining of vast new territory for proselyting purposes ; in other words, the establishing of the future empire of the Pope on the western continent in the event of its finally being supplanted in Europe by the new heresy, Lutheranism and the Reformation. This has been aptly stated recently by Mr. Addison Child, in a letter to the Boston Tran- 46 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. script. Alluding to the Icelandic discoveries, he wrote : " But the reason that these and probably earlier discoveries were not more noticed and utilized, was that the need of another continent to conquer and colonize had not arisen, and did not rise until nearly the end of the fifteenth century." The advent of Luther and the incipient heresy that preceded him led to the restoring of the inquisition in Spain for the suppression of heresy, and also led to the discovery, so called, of America by Christopher Columbus, the land that was to be made the future and permanent stronghold of the Church of Rome. x The vital and all-absorbing question now is, whether this American Republic, founded on purely secular principles, wishes to pay posthu mous honours, on a scale of unprecedented mag nificence, and at the bidding of the Pope, and the countries under his dominion, Spain, Italy, and the Spanish- American republics, to the Roman Catholic missionary and devotee, Chris topher Columbus, who was sent out by the Church of Rome to convert the natives of a land whose locality he knew, having ascertained it definitely in Iceland before he started forth on his voyage to the western continent ? As there are, therefore, no grounds whatsoever upon which the Government of the United States LEIF ERIKSON. 47 can rightfully, or in accordance with facts, cele brate Columbus s first voyage to this country as a discovery, a scientific achievement, or a triumph of maritime skill in any sense, to ascribe the credit of such a discovery to Columbus, without his torical warrant, and by a national act, would be to publicly sanction the claims of the Church of Rome to this land, and virtually to invite the Pope to come and take possession of it. This is the significance and value of the pro posed Columbus celebration, in 1892, to the Roman Catholic countries that are so strongly urging it. It is this that I protest against, in the name of historical truth and republican principles. I do it as an American, prizing and revering the Con stitution under which I live, and wishing it pre served inviolate. I know that the Church of Rome destroyed the Republic of Iceland in the year 1262, and I know that the Church of Rome is steadily undermining this republic of ours. Instead of the contemplated Romish triumph, the Columbus celebration in 1892, I appeal most earnestly to the Government of the United States to give its full official recognition to the discovery of America by Leif Erikson, in A.D. 1000, and to commemorate this first great event in American history by a national celebration of the most magnificent description, to be in conjunction with the celebration of the framing of our Constitution, 48 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. and held at the same date, 1889, inasmuch as Ice land was a proud and powerful republic at the period of the discovery of America, and should, by virtue of this, hold the highest place in our national regard. As a fitting way to commemorate the Icelandic discovery, perhaps the most fitting and appropriate, I beg to lay before Congress my plan for a Viking exhibition, which is intended to be a revelation of the brilliant Viking age in the Scandinavian North. Such a historical exhibition, contained within the walls of an ancient Icelandic Viking hall, of superb dimensions, would recall in the most vivid and objective manner the Viking period, the mode of life and attainments of that age, justly styled the Augustan age of the North. The ancient Republic of Iceland and our modern one would thus be placed side by side, the republic of the year 1000 and that of the year 1889, the United States honouring Iceland for the discovery of this land ! All of the essentials for such a historical ex hibition are to be found in the museums and splendid collections of Europe, especially in the Scandinavian lands. The walls of the Viking hall could be decorated, as of old, with the swords and shields of the Norse warriors ; on the table set apart for these could stand the horns and beakers from which these warriors drank their toasts to victorious leaders ; specimens of their art in wood- LEIF ERIKSON. 49 carving, tapestry, etc., could adorn the panels and wainscot of the hall, and the sculptured form of one of these warriors in armour, and of a Norse lady, one of the brave ancient type that felt such deep pride in the valiant deeds of the Vikings, and who were such worthy companions of these, could stand there, the massive gold armlets and clasps, the ornate belt, worn by both, gleaming in the light of the central fires, which would also illumine the harp of the Icelandic skald, narrating to them some grand and heroic exploit of their renowned country men. Outside the hall could be a full-size repro duction of the famous Viking ship, exhumed at Gokstad, in Norway, in 1880. In the works of Sir George Dasent, of the late Pro fessor Rudolph Keyser, of the University of Christ- iania, and of many other Scandinavian authors and historians, are detailed descriptions of the con struction and interior appointments of these Viking halls, so that there would be no difficulty in repro ducing them with a great degree of historic accuracy. It is from a work of Sir George Dasent, his transla tion of the " Saga of Burnt Njal," that I have taken the facade and ground-plan of a Viking hall printed on my circular describing the plan of such an exhibition. This was designed by the Icelandic artist and antiquary, Sigurd Gudmundson, and is said to be correct. But more important than all else would be the 4 50 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY QF AMERICA. Icelandic manuscripts, the identical ones preserved in the Royal Library and the Arno-Magnaean collection, in Copenhagen, containing the accounts of the Icelandic voyages of discovery to Greenland and Vinland, and the long occupancy of those lands. The president of the Icelandic Antiquarian Society, Herra Ami Thorsteinson, in a long cordial letter written to me from Reykjavik, and in English, kindly gives me his opinion in regard to the import ance of having these manuscripts in such an exhibition as the one proposed. He writes : "The historical event of the discovery of America is built on written documents, or manuscripts from Iceland, which do not exist here now, but are in the several collections of manuscripts, in the collec tion of Arni Magnusson, in Copenhagen, the Royal Library in Copenhagen, and so on. The exhibition of those manuscripts would in the most brilliant manner show the civilized world to whom we owe the discovery of America." All these objects, the visible relics of ripe civilization and culture, collected under the roof of an Icelandic Viking hall, and viewed amid their own proper surroundings, would be of supreme interest to the scholars and historians, to the think ing public of all the nations of Europe, as well as of our own land, while the beauty and novelty of the display would interest even the most superficial observers. It is needless for me to state that there LEIF ERIKSON. 51 has never been a historical exhibition of this kind ; that is to say, the relics and antiquities of the Viking period have never been gathered together in a general exhibition, but the separate articles have remained in their respective museums, for the most part in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. While we have had " Old London " and " Old Edin burgh," we have never had " Old Iceland," and there are brilliant possibilities in that direction. In justice to myself I beg to say that the exhibition I propose is an entirely original plan of my own, not derived from any other source, and I have a very deep desire that it may be carried out. This Viking exhibition could be the basis of a permanent Icelandic or Scandinavian addition to the National Museum. An expansion of the National Museum has been proposed by the directors, so as to comprise a vast collection of American antiquities, records and relics. Now, inasmuch as the Icelanders discovered this country and established settlements in New England that endured for several hundred years, any Icelandic or Norse relics of antiquity can properly be styled American ones, and should be assigned their due place in such a collection as that in the National Museum. The ship Leif Erikson crossed the ocean in must have closely resembled the Viking ship unearthed in Norway, and the buildings he and Thorfinn Karlsefne erected in Vinland could 4 2 52 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. not have been unlike my proposed Viking hall, although, of course, smaller and simpler in style. It would be no small enjoyment to Americans to see just how the Icelanders, the ancient Norsemen, lived on our shores, the habits and customs that they brought with them here, as well as their sumptuous mode of life at home in Iceland. A detailed description of my proposed Viking exhibition, to be held in 1889, was printed in the Independent of February 16. I had the pleasure of mailing a copy to each member of this com mittee. To you, and to the Government, I now confide my cause, which is also, be it remembered, the cause of this country and of Iceland, as well as of the entire Scandinavian North. The world awaits your decision, the decision of this nation. Washington, D. C., March 26, 1888. THE VIKING EXHIBITION.* Celebration of the Discovery of America by Leif Erikson, A.D. 1000. If Mallet s words are true that " history has not recorded the annals of a people who have oc casioned greater, more sudden, or more numerous revolutions in Europe than the Scandinavians, or * The Independent, New York, February 16, 1888. LEIF ERIKSON. 53 whose antiquities, at the same time, are so little known," and if Wilhelmi was also correct in stating that " in the Heimskringla we obtain from the narratives of the Icelanders extensive journeys through all Europe to Rome, Constantinople, and Jerusalem, also the knowledge of the history, geography, and antiquity of Eastern, Western, and Southern Europe," the modern world cannot but conclude that the ancient Scandinavians, and par ticularly the Icelanders, were a people of un equalled prowess, the ripest attainments, capable of the intellectual and physical mastery of any race they chose to subdue, capable alike of discovery and conquest. The discovery of America, pro nounced the greatest achievement in modern times, was the least of their achievements, for they had already done so much more than that in Europe. The Viking Exhibition, which I have proposed should be held in Washington in 1889, in con nection with the celebration of the forming of our Constitution, would be a revelation, a resurrection, so to speak, of the brilliant Viking Age, presenting vividly and objectively the surroundings amid which those proudest and most indomitable of men lived; the old Icelandic Vikinga-skaH^ or banqueting- hall, their shields and weapons, ornaments of gold, silver, and bronze, their beakers, and specimens of decorative art in carved panels, tapestry, etc., 54 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. together with the edifice, which could be repro duced with perfect historical accuracy, thanks to the minute details of habitations, manners, and cus toms given by the Northern writers, and also a full-size model of the famous Viking ship exhumed at Gokstad, in Norway, in the year 1880. Such a revelation of Viking life, of the precise period of the discovery of America by Leif Erikson, would be a marvel of beauty, and a priceless treasure to the historian and antiquary. It would bring to our shores all the cultured people and scholars of Europe, and it would give to the United States the unprecedented distinction of having conceived of and brought to perfection the most magnificent and unique historical exhibition ever arranged by any nation. The design for the Viking hall I found in that very valuable work by Sir George W. Dasent, the " Saga of Burnt Njal," the introduction to which contains excellent descriptions of the dwellings and mode of life in Iceland at that period. The facade and ground -plan were sketched by the noted Icelandic artist and antiquary, Sigurdur Gudmundson. The author states that " in the abodes of chiefs and great men this building had great dimensions, and was then called a skdli, or hall." Rudolph Keyser, the late professor in history at the Royal University in Christiania, Norway, mentions, in " The Private Life of the Old LEIF ERIKSON. 55 Northmen," that they sometimes had as many as 1,200 guests at a banquet, and had to borrow silver and table linen from their neighbours on these great occasions. He also gives minute de scriptions of the Vikinga- skdli. He says : " The skdli was erected in the form of an oblong, generally in a direction lying east and west, with the main entrance probably in the eastern gable- end. Before this entrance was a kind of vestibule, which was called by various names. ... It appears to have been open in the front, and so broad that several persons could stand abreast in it. ... The skdli was open to the roof, and one could see above the rafters up to the ridge. . . . The walls of the skdli were commonly panelled on the inside, and sometimes the inside of the roof was ornamented with carved work and paintings, representing mythical or historical events, or sub jects taken from nature. It was, moreover, the custom to hang up weapons, especially shields, on the walls. . . . Sometimes, on great occasions, the walls were decked with tapestry (tj 6ld\ which pro bably was composed of home-wrought embroidery, or of embroidered woollen cloths, and occasionally with costly stuffs of foreign manufacture. . . . The beds were often furnished with costly coverings and curtains, and were stuffed with down and covered with ticking ; and sheets of foreign linen were not wanting. . . . There can hardly be any doubt that 56 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. wealthy people, especially in Norway, where there was a superabundance of timber, used to have special skdli intended only for festive occasions, in which cases they were not furnished with beds. Different circumstances tend to the belief that the skdli were in general very spacious ; for it required a great deal of room to accommodate so many guests as might often be found assembled at the banquets of the old Northmen." Sir George Dasent s description coincides with the above. I quote some interesting details he gives : " Internally the hall consisted of three divisions, a nave and two low side -aisles. The walls of these aisles were of stone, and low enough to allow of their being mounted with ease. . . . The centre division, or nave, on the other hand, rose high above the others on two rows of pillars. It was of timber, and had an open-work timber roof. The roofs of the side-aisles were supported by posts as well as by rafters and cross-beams leaning against the pillars of the nave. . . . There were fittings of wainscot along the walls of the side- aisles, and all around between the pillars of the inner row, supporting the roof of the nave, ran a wainscot panel. In places the wainscot was pierced by doors opening into sleeping places phut off from the rest of the hall on all sides, for the needs of the family. . . . The whole of the nave LEIF ERIKSON. 57 within the wainscot, between the inner round pillars, was filled by the hall, properly so called. It had long hearths for fires in the middle, with louvres to let out the smoke. On either side, nearest to the wainscot, and in some cases touch ing it, was a row of benches (bekK) ; in each of these was a high seat (pnduegi) if the hall was that of a great man, that on the south side being the owner s seat. Before these seats were tables boards which, however, do not seem, any more than our early Middle Age tables, to have been always kept standing, but were brought in with and cleared away after each meal." We have in these two works, and others at com mand, all the details necessary for the construction of one of these sumptuous festive halls, while the museums of the Scandinavian lands, and to some extent of Great Britain and France also, would supply all the appointments, the swords and shields of the Vikings, the massive belts and gold armlets and necklaces, ornate and beautiful, that both men and women wore, their gold and silver beakers, wood-carving, tapestry, etc. There also should be displayed the proofs of their great maritime achieve ment the discovery of America the identical Icelandic manuscripts in which, in exquisite pen manship, the accounts of their voyages and settle ments in Greenland and Vinland are recorded. A Roman Catholic author, the rev. superior of an 58 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. industrial school at Skidaway Island, Savannah, Father Oswald Moosmiiller, who has made an exhaustive study of this subject, and gives the fruits of it to the world in his book, " Europaer in Amerika vor Columbus," includes a list of the sources in the Royal Library at Copenhagen an astonishingly large one : two manuscripts, the " Codex Legati Arno-Magnaeani," No. 544, and the " Codex A. M.," No. 557, contain the life of Thor- finn Karlsefne ; two, besides the well-known " Codex Flatoiensis ;" containing the Saga of Erik the Red, and of Thorfinn Karlsefne; the "Codex Frisianus A. M.," No. 45, and the " Codex A. M.," No. 6 1, include the discovery of Vinland, by Leif Erikson ; two, the " Codex Regius Annalium," and the " Codex A. M.," No. 420, contain the account of Bishop Erik s voyage to Vinland. But, irrespec tive of all these, the reverend author informs me in a private letter that he " collected his material in Rome about twenty years ago," and refers me to the Vatican for authentic data, and the most interesting documents concerning the bishops of Iceland and Greenland. In regard to Christopher Columbus, the writer states, unequivocally, that the fact of Columbus s visit to Iceland in 1477 is proved by the archives of the island, and he affirms that Columbus conferred in the Latin language with the Benedictine Bishop Magnus, the former abbot of the monastery of Helgafell, and that LEIF ERIKSON. 59 Bishop Magnus had the records of the discovery in his own monastery. In "Chambers Encyclopaedia," in the paragraph devoted to " Vinland," the state ment is to be found that " Finn Magnusen has con clusively established the fact that Columbus did visit Iceland in 1477, fifteen years before he under took his great expedition across the Atlantic." All the Scandinavian historians corroborate this, and a large number of authors of other nationalities : Von Humboldt, Malte-Brun, Beamish, Laing, Toul- min Smith, Arthur Helps, Bayard Taylor, and many others. A very important admission was made a year ago, by Fr. Bodfish, of Boston, in the paper he read on the " Discovery of America by the North men," before the Bostonian Society, thus quoted by the Boston Journal : " The Catholic evidence from Church history was cited, which said that mis sionaries accompanied Leif on his expeditions. Erik was the first Catholic bishop of America, a fact worthy of historical belief, and he sent word to Rome. Afterward Columbus obtained this know ledge at Rome, and inspired his sailors with accounts of maps of the places in the New World visited by the Northmen." In view of the mass of records, of authentic his tory, contained in all the great libraries of Europe, including those of Rome, that fully establish the fact of the prior discovery of America by the Ice landers, and also the fact that Columbus obtained 60 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. full knowledge of this discovery in Iceland, during the visit he made there, for this distinct purpose, in February, 1477, it does not lie at all in my plan to have the honour of the discovery of America shared between Leif Erikson and Columbus, or to have a joint celebration, in any sense of the word. The man who simply followed Leif Erikson and imitated his achievement, 500 years afterwards, is in no wise to be regarded as the equal of the original discoverer, as little as Spain, the country that was his patron, monarchical, benighted, priest- ridden land that it was then, and is still, was the equal of the republican Iceland of the tenth cen tury. A man who wrote in one of his letters that " in the name of the sacred Trinity, there may be sent as many slaves as sale could be found for in Spain," was not the man who, at this late day, is entitled to the homage of the free people of the United States. " In the course of these letters," affirms Sir Arthur Helps, " through which Colum bus speaks after the fashion of a practised slave- dealer, he alludes to the intended adoption, on behalf of private individuals, of a -system of exchange of slaves for goods wanted from the mother country." No ; let the homage of the American Republic be given to Iceland, the grand and noble republic of the past, and let this nation acknowledge as the discoverer of the land the free-minded, brave Ice- LEIF ERIK SON. 61 lander who sailed hither in his own ship, accom panied by an intelligent, manly crew, for the sole object of discovery and exploration, who traversed the West to a great distance, and who gave to the country the name of the Good Vinland ! MARIE A. BROWN (now MARIE A. SHIPLEY). CHAPTER III. SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. SINCE the presentation to Congress of the foregoing plea and petition, I have obtained a mass of corroborative testimony from Roman Catholic sources, proving every point made in my plea, as well as the statement contained in my book " The Icelandic Discoverers of America," that in the Vatican and other monastic libraries of Europe are the records and documents that will fully establish the fact that America was discovered by Leif Erikson in the year 1000, and that Norse colonies existed there for several centuries. It is this testimony, contained in the following extracts, that I beg to lay before the public. MARIE A. SHIPLEY. Extracts from Centennial Discourse delivered by Rev. Wm. F. Clark, SJ., at St. Joseph s Church, Philadelphia, July 4, 1876. As Catholics we have special cause for rejoicing : for the light of our faith was the first to gild with its glory the land that we love ; our missionaries the first to preach here the name of Christ ; our martyrs the first to fertilize with their blood the soil out of which has sprung the thousands of SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 63 Christian temples, whose lofty spires we now behold lift heavenward the glittering emblem of salvation, in every State and Territory of the Union. Centuries before the great Christopher Columbus had opened a way through mid-ocean from Europe to America, our priests, by the au thority of the Roman Pontiff yes, and our bishops too had landed on the shores of more than one of the thirteen original States, had preached our faith, offered our sacrifice, administered our sacra ments, and died martyrs to their zeal for our religion. These are facts little known even to the learned until comparatively of late years, when the re searches of American antiquarian societies, both here and in Europe, placed within reach of the student the many precious documents relating to the pre-Columbian period of our history, which had long and carefully been preserved in the royal library in Copenhagen and the papal library of the Vatican at Rome. That long before the ninth century Catholicity was transplanted from the shores of Europe, Asia, or Africa to those of America, by bold navigators and hardy adventurers, is highly probable. But interesting as the examination of such a question might prove, we cannot attempt it now, but must be satisfied with the statement that, according to the records that have thus far come to light, the first Christians who visited this country came from 64 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. Greenland and Iceland, known to geographers as Danish America. Catholic missionaries visited Danish America in 827 (Moosmiiller, a Benedictine monk. In his work he has a list of sixty-eight authors who have treated of the pre-Columbian history of America), more than a thousand years ago. In 834, Pope Gregory IV. placed Iceland and Greenland under the jurisdic tion of Ansgar, Archbishop of Hamburg, whom he appointed his apostolic legate for the north (Papal Bull, Diploma of the Emperor Louis le Debonnaire). Iceland and Greenland being entirely Catholic as early as 1004, the interest of religion in those countries required the erection of epis copal sees, and in the year 1055 Adalbert, Arch bishop of Bremen-Hamburg these two cities then formed one archiepiscopal see consecrated Jon Bishop of Skalholt, in Iceland, and Albert Bishop of Gardar, in Greenland (Adam of Bremen, " Historia Ecclesiastica "). Bishop Jon, who was a Scot, after a four years residence in Iceland, came to this country in the year 1059, to convert the natives and administer to the spiritual wants of the Catholic Scandinavian population colonists from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, and Greenland who from time to time had formed settlements in what they called Vinland, a tract of country described in old maps as extending over the entire eastern portion of Massachusetts and part of Rhode SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 65 Island, commencing at Cape Ann and terminating with Narragansett Bay. More, then, than eight hundred years ago, and consequently nearly six hundred years before the Puritan Pilgrims set foot on Plymouth Rock, the Catholic Church had a bishop there yes, and martyr too (Mallet, " Intro duction a 1 Histoire du Dannemarc," t. i., p. 254; " Island s Landnarnabok," p. 396 ; Th. Torfeus, "Historia Vinlandiae Antiq.,"p. 71; Gravier, p. 166) for the saintly prelate fell a victim to zeal and charity beneath the deadly arrows of those for whom he was endeavouring to open the gates of heaven. More than fifty years before his time, in the year 1003, one of the headlands of Massachusetts, near the present city of Boston, was called the Promontory of the Cross, from the grave of Thor- wald, a Catholic explorer, whose dying request, when he was mortally wounded by the Esquimaux, was that his companions should bury him there and place a cross at his head and another at his feet (Rafn, "Antiquitates Americanae," pp. 40, etc., 426, etc. ; Snorre Sturleson, c. 108, p. 312 ; Th. Torfaeus, "Hist. Vinl. Antiq.,"p. 10; Gravier, p. 63; Gravier, p. 106; Beauvois, p. 31 ; Torfaeus, p. 28). The first birth from Catholic parents, and there fore the first baptism in America, was that of Snorre, who was bom in 1009, of Thorfinn and Gudrida, on the western shore of Mount Hope 5 66 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. Bay, in Bristol County, Rhode Island. His family returned to Iceland, and thence, after the death of her husband and the marriage of her son, Gudrida went on a pilgrimage to Rome, and glad dened the heart of the Holy Father with news from his children in the New World. Thus you perceive that the first Catholic mother of America was the first pilgrim from the western shore to the shrine of St. Peter and the Court of the Vatican and this more than eight hundred years ago ! A historian, who records the fact, writes : " Rome lent a ready ear to accounts of geographical dis coveries, and collected facts and narratives. Every discovery seemed an extension of papal dominion, and a new field for the preaching of the Gospel." I might disappoint your laudable curiosity were I not to add that this pious woman returned to Ice land and ended her days as a nun in a Benedictine convent built by her son, and that son had among his grandchildren three who were bishops of Ice land. The martyr Jon was not the only bishop who visited what is now Rhode Island. In the year 1 12 1, Erik, Bishop of Gardar, Greenland, went to Vinland, and, like Bishop Jon, ended his life in this country (Rembegla, p. 320 ; Rafn, "Ant. Am.," p. 261 ; " Dec. de 1 Am.," p. 50; Beauvois, p. 66; Th. Torfaeus, " Vin. An.," p. 71). What, more than two centuries ago, people called the old stone mill SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 67 at Newport, admitted by all to be a work of Norse- / , men, antiquaries say was erected about the time of Bishop Erik, and was a baptistery, built after / the style of many of the baptisteries of the Middle Ages. (Similar baptisteries have been discovered in Greenland at Igalikko, Kakortok, and Iglorsoit.) As the Catholic colonies were for centuries depen dent on the bishops of Greenland and Iceland, it may be well to remark that these bishops were, by order of Pope Gregory IV., in 834, suffragans of the Archbishop of Hamburg; that in 1099 they became suffragans of the Archbishop of Lund, by order of Pope Urban II. ; and finally in 1154 they became suffragans of the Archbishop of Drontheim in Norway, by order of Pope Anastasius IV. ; and history testifies that from time to time they crossed the ocean to attend the provincial councils held in those metropolitan cities (Moosmiiller). In 1276 the crusades were preached in America (Paul Riant, "Exped. et peler. Scandin.," p. 364), and Peter-pence were collected here and sent to Rome by order of Pope John XXL, and subsequently by order of his successors, Nicholas III. and Martin V. (Riant, p. 365 ; Th. Torfaeus, " Hist. Gronl.," p. 25 ; Kohl, p. 94; Malte-Brun, liv. 18, t. i., p. 289). Catholicity, in a word, was in a flourishing condition in Iceland and Greenland, and we may infer in Vinland, till the middle of the sixteenth century, when the northern nations, 68 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. having to a great degree apostatized from the faith, King Christian of Denmark, in 1540, sent preachers to Danish America to substitute Lu- theranism for the old faith, a substitution which was inaugurated by dragging off one of the bishops of Iceland, Augmond of Skalholt, to a prison in Denmark, and beheading the other, Jon Arleson of Holum, in 1551 ; the people meanwhile pro testing against the change of religion with the declaration that it belonged not to the King of Denmark, but to the Roman Pontiff, to teach them what they should believe. This adhesion to the teaching of the Roman see characterized the Greenlanders also, as Pope Nicholas V. testifies in a letter written in 1448, in which he states that they had then been Catholics for nearly six hundred years. The last Bishop of Gardar was Vincent, who was consecrated in 1537 forty-five years, as you perceive, after the discovery of America by Columbus, and nearly five hundred years after the erection of the see. We may reasonably conclude that for several years the Divine sacrifice of the Mass, with its in separable thanksgiving, was simultaneously offered in Vinland by the descendants of the Norsemen, and on the shores of Florida and in the islands off the southern coast by the missionaries who followed in the track of Columbus. Finally, deprived of their pastors, the scattered flock SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 69 gradually lost their faith, and now nothing remains to tell of the Christianity of Vinland but the ancient documents from which I have quoted, and the remains of the stone baptistery at New port, Rhode Island, which some of you, no doubt, have seen. If I have dwelt long upon the Catholic history of the Norsemen in what are now the New Eng land States, it was because I supposed the subject would be equally novel and interesting. Nor can I leave it without stating that the form of govern ment in Iceland, Greenland and Vinland was republican (Gravier, pp. 27, 37) from the founda tion of the respective colonies till the year 1261, when they became dependencies of the crown of Norway. There was, therefore, a little Catholic republic on this continent seven hundred, perhaps eight hundred, years ago. The American Catholic Quarterly Review, April, 1888. America Discovered and Christianized by the Northmen, by Richard H. Clarke. The Northmen, wandering fragments of Asiatic tribes, after traversing Europe, found a home and founded a nation in Norway, only when the sea arrested their progress. Here they achieved a per manent conquest and founded the mother country, from whose sea-indented shores proceeded so many expeditions pregnant with the fate of nations. . . . 70 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. In 860, Naddod, a Norwegian pirate, on his voyage to the Feroes, was carried far out of his course by a tempest, and this accident led to his discovery of Iceland, the " Ultima Thule " of the ancients. This ice-clad island became a colony of the mother country. About the year 900 Rollo made the con quest of Normandy. In 1060 we find a Norman prince established in Apulia. In 1066 William the Conqueror becomes the master and King of England, and founds the present dynasty of Great Britain. It will thus be seen that the Northmen were at the height of their power and activity when they discovered and colonized portions of the western continent in the tenth century. . . . The learned geographers and skilful critics, who have reviewed all these circumstances, have decided that the first land discovered was Nantucket, one degree south of Boston, the second Nova Scotia, the third Newfoundland. . . . The observations made of the country and climate accord with wonderful accuracy in locating Vinland the Good, of the Northmen, in the region near Newport, Rhode Island. . . . This expedition of Leif Erik- son was regarded as the most fortunate of all, for he had discovered Vinland the Good, had rescued five of his countrymen from death at sea, and had introduced Christianity into Greenland. The eccle siastics who accompanied the expedition were the first Christian priests in that early age that visited SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 71 America. They afterwards became the founders of the Church of Greenland, which flourished for several centuries. The remains of the temples are now visited by adventurous tourists, and are familiar to the Moravian missionaries of Green land. Leif Erikson was thus the first discoverer of our country. ... It would certainly be an interesting field of inquiry to investigate the ques tion of whether Columbus had any knowledge of the Norse discoveries in the western hemisphere, and to what extent. There are a number of cir cumstances strongly tending to show that Columbus knew something of these events. His long and thorough study of the subject in all its aspects must have guided his mind to this information. The absolute certainty he professed to have that he could discover land in the West could not have rested upon theory alone ; it must have been based upon information of facts also. He himself says that he based his certainty upon the authority of learned writers. . . . The visit of Columbus to Iceland, in February, 1477, brought him in more immediate contact with the traditions and written accounts in relation to the Norse discoveries in the western continent. He is believed to have con versed with the bishop and other learned men of Iceland, and as his visit there was fifteen years before he discovered America, and only one hundred and thirty years after the last Norse 72 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. expedition to the lands in the western ocean, he must have met Icelanders whose grandfathers lived in the time of that expedition, and perhaps were members of it. It is unlikely that Columbus could have been so active in his researches for geographical and nautical information as all his biographers repre sent, and yet have been in the midst of so much information on these subjects without coming in contact with it. ... Rome was then, as she has been ever since, alive to geographical discoveries, as affording the channel for conveying the faith to heathen peoples. Rome was represented in the western hemisphere by a succession of seven teen bishops, and one of them, Bishop Eric Upsi, became the apostle of Vinland in the twelfth century, a fact which indicates a permanent settle ment of Northmen in Rhode Island. ... It is believed that the traditions of these expeditions of the Northmen to distant lands beyond the ocean reached the eager ears of Columbus ; that he not only saw and read accounts of them at Rome, but, on the occasion of his voyage to Iceland in the spring of 1477, heard the legends of Vinland from Norse tongues, and learned them more minutely from the monastic manuscripts pre served in the ancient convents. Columbus never divulged to the public the extent of his knowledge of facts pointing to lands in the western ocean. SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 73 At Rome, also, Columbus must have heard of the Norse expeditions to Greenland and Vinland. . . . It is also argued that, as Pope Paschal II., in the year 1121, appointed Eric Upsi Bishop of Garda in Greenland, and the bishop visited Vinland as part of his spiritual domain, Columbus, in search of such knowledge, must have found it where it was most accessible. There is also some ground for believing, though the fact is not established, that a map of Vinland was preserved in the Vatican, and that a copy of it was furnished to the Pinzons. Facts such as these must have formed a consider able part of the knowledge acquired by Columbus in his many years of study. . . . Leo XIII. has now opened to historical students the treasures of the Vatican ; may we not now hope to solve this interesting question ? May we not hope to recover the history of the Church of Greenland and Vin land, and of the seventeen bishops, and of the numerous missionaries who first carried the cross to the West ? The American Catholic Quarterly Review, July, 1889. The Conversion of the Northmen, by Richard H. Clarke. In the American Catholic Quarterly Review for April, 1888, we gave an account of the discoveries and colonies of the Northmen in the western 74 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. hemisphere, commencing with the close of the tenth century ; and we hinted at the influence these events had exerted upon the subsequent discovery of America by Columbus. As a fitting sequel we now propose to give the early religious and ecclesi astical history of these Northmen, and, in the near future, of the Norse Church on our continent during the same period. Our data are chiefly derived from the ancient Icelandic literature ; but as much of the account is deduced from papal bulls, briefs, letters, and other Roman sources, may we not express the hope that this interesting subject, treated herein now for the first time as a separate and distinct study, may lead to a more thorough and complete elucidation of so attractive and important a branch of ecclesiastical history ? We feel the more encouraged to express this hope here, since that illustrious Pope, scholar, and author, who so gloriously and so ably fills the papal chair, Leo XIII., has opened the treasures of the Vatican to the researches of the students, his torians, scholars, and antiquaries of the world. There were two spots on the earth that held inter course for five centuries with the distant and struggling colonies and Church of Greenland and Vinland. One of these was the frozen island, whose intrepid sons, the Vikings of Iceland, reached our shores in the tenth century, and planted there a commonwealth and a Christian SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 75 Church : the other was Rome, mother of nations and of churches, whose pontiffs provided that most distant and forlorn portion of the Universal Church with a succession of seventeen bishops, and when overwhelmed with disaster struggled to revive the Church and episcopate of Greenland. It is to the former that we are indebted for that rich and beautiful Icelandic literature which first gave the modern world the earliest and authentic accounts of the voyages, the discoveries, the colonies, and the heroic deeds of the Northmen in America. Thus, from the traditional histories and epics of the saga-men and scalds of Iceland, subsequently reduced to writing by the monks of the frozen island, the " Ultima Thule " of the ancients, collected together, carefully compiled, and hand somely published by the Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries, by the labours of the European societies of Americanists, and other learned bodies, aided by the Governments of Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, we have received accessions to the history of our race of the rarest, most instructive, reliable, and authentic character. So, too, we must also turn to the Roman archives, to the treasures of the Vatican, now so generously made accessible to the world by Pope Leo XIII., for the details of the ecclesiastical history of the Northmen in America, so far as the same may be contained in papal bulls, briefs, and letters, and 76 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. in the reports and relations of the bishops and missionaries who took part in the conversion of the barbarians of the north of Europe, and in forming their missions, churches, and episcopal sees. There is one subject more especially, now most imperfectly explored, and involved in doubt and confusion, which is, the episcopate of the western hemisphere, involving the exact names of the seventeen or eighteen bishops, the dates of their appointments, the exact order of succession, their history and services to the cause of Chris tianity, what reports they made to Rome, when and where and by whom consecrated, their deaths and burials, and the churches which they founded. Of Bishop Eric, the first bishop, the one who is said to have come to America and preached the Gospel, and sealed his preaching with his blood among the aborigines of our country, the least is known. Of the others, we can approximate to the order of succession and other particulars ; but we possess no detailed or complete history in respect to most of them. It is not improbable that Eric, the first, may not have been the only Greenland bishop to visit our country, and announce the glad tidings to the Scr&lings of his day. The Roman archives would certainly go far to clear up our doubts, and to supply the deficiencies in our earliest ecclesiastical history. SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 77 Father BodfisWs Paper, read before the Bostonian Society, on the Discovery of America by the North men. From the report in the Boston Journal, February 9, 1887. The Catholic evidence from Church history was cited, which said that missionaries accompanied Leif on his expedition. Erik was the first Catholic bishop of America, a fact worthy of historical belief, and he sent word to Rome. Afterward Columbus obtained this knowledge at Rome, and inspired his sailors with accounts of maps of the places in the New World visited by the Northmen. From the report of the same in the Daily Advertiser, Boston, February 9, 1887. The essayist quoted, as corroborative authority, the account given in standard history of the Catholic Church, of the establishment of a bishopric in Greenland in 1121 A.D., and he added the interesting suggestion that, as it is the duty of a bishop so placed at a distance to report from time to time to the Pope, not only on ecclesiastical matters, but of the geography of the country and character of the people, it is probable that Columbus had the benefit of the knowledge possessed at Rome thus derived. It is, he said, stated in different biographies of Columbus that, when the voyage was first proposed by him, he 78 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. found difficulty in getting Spanish sailors to agree to go with him in so doubtful an undertaking. After Columbus returned from a visit to Rome, with information there obtained, these sailors, or enough of them, appear to have had their doubts or fears removed, and no difficulty in enlistment was experienced. History of the Catholic Missions among the Indian Tribes of the United States, by John Gilmary Shea. The discovery of America, like every other event in the history of the world, had, in the designs of God, the great object of the salvation of mankind. Iceland was first discovered by Christian missionaries from Ireland, and though the pagan Northmen soon colonized the island and the shores of Greenland, it was only at the moment when they were about to renounce Woden for Christ. Greenland was scarcely planted when missionaries arrived to win the Scandinavian to the faith. From the time of their conversion these colonies became centres of Christianity, and hardy missionaries ventured down to the coast of our republic to convert the pagan colonists and the surrounding natives. Soon after the settle ment of Greenland by Eric the Red, his son Leif visited Norway, and was induced by St. Olaus, SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 79 then king of that country, to embrace the true faith. Returning to Greenland in 1000, Leif bore with him priests to convert the colonists, and in a short time most of the Northmen in America em braced Christianity. Churches and convents arose in different parts, rivalling those of Iceland in piety and learning. Thorwald, Thorstein, and subse quently Thorfinn, of Irish origin, visited this place, and a settlement was gradually formed. As yet all were not Christians ; some still adored Thor and Woden, and missionaries left Greenland to establish religion in Vinland. Of these mission aries the most celebrated was Erik, who arrived in Greenland, and, after labouring a few years, proceeded to Vinland. Spending some years here, he returned to Iceland in 1120, and sailed to Europe to induce the establishment of a bishopric, and a proper organization of the Church. Deem ing Erik the most suitable person, the Scandinavian bishops selected him to found the first American see, and the missionary was consecrated at Lund, in Denmark, by Archbishop Adzar, in 1121. . . . After his consecration Erik returned to America, but, still attached to his mission, led a body of clergy and colonists to Vinland. Here he found so ample a field for his labour that he resigned his bishopric, and never returned to Greenland. As to the position of Vinland there can be little doubt. A careful study of the narratives of the early 8o THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. voyagers narratives stamped with the imprint of truth leaves no doubt that they turned Cape Cod, and entered the waters of Narragansett Bay. Lives of the Deceased Bishops of the Catholic Church in the United States, by Richard H. Clarke, A.M. The Church of America is said even now to be in its infancy. So much is to be done. So vast is the field. So rapid her present growth. Yet she possesses an antiquity of her own, traces her history back eight hundred years, and links her origin and traditions with the Ages of Faith. In the tenth century Christianity was planted on our continent by Northmen, and in the twelfth a devoted Catholic bishop and zealous missionaries blessed the soil of our own country by their ministry and by their lives. Preface. Erik, Bishop of Gar da, First American Bishop, A.D. 1 121. From the same work. Our soil was blessed by Christianity, by its missions, prayers, and sacrifices, as early as the tenth century a flash of light and glory most effulgent, but transient a ray of hope for a future Christendom. . . . Leif returned to Greenland in the year 1000, accompanied by Catholic mission aries, who must have been imbued with the true apostolic spirit, for it was not long before most SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 81 of the Northmen in America were Christians. The churches and convents in Greenland began to compare in piety and learning with those of the mother country. . . . Thus created Bishop of Garda, in Greenland, the whole of the Norse colonies in America were within his jurisdiction, including the Vinland of our own country. Ever intent on the spread of religion and the organiza tion of the Church of Vinland, as well as the conversion of the savages of the South, he lost no time in visiting the new colony on the shores of Narragansett Bay, accompanied by a band of zealous missionaries, who had volunteered for that service, and by a colony of settlers. History of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States, by Henry de Courcy and John Gilmary Shea. The missionary spirit is inherent in the Catholic Church, and it dates from the moment when our Lord said to His Apostles, "Go and teach all nations." Before St. Paul had left Asia Minor, missionaries had already penetrated to Italy and Spain, and from their day to our own, each suc ceeding age has produced her heroes, devoting their lives to the greatest of human enterprises the conversion of souls. When the still pagan Northmen discovered Iceland, in the eighth century of our present era, they found on the 6 82 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. shore crosses, bells, and sacred vessels of Irish workmanship. The island had therefore been visited by Catholic missionaries, and the Irish clergy may with justice lay claim to the discovery of the New World. The Northmen, after founding a colony in Ice land, pushed their discovery westward, and soon discovered a part of the western continent, to which, from the agreeable verdure with which it was covered, they gave the name of Greenland. When these hardy explorers returned to Norway, they found the idols of Scandinavia hurled to the dust. The king had embraced the true faith, and the whole people had renounced paganism. A missionary set sail in the first vessel that steered towards the new-found land, and erelong the little colony was Catholic. Iceland and Greenland soon had their churches, their convents, their bishops, their colleges, their libraries, their apostolic men. The explorers Beorn and Leif having coasted southerly along the Atlantic shore, towards the bays where the countless spires of Boston and New York now tower, missionaries immediately offered to go and preach the Gospel to the savage nations of the South ; and it is certain that in 1120 Bishop Eric visited in person Vinland, or the land of vines. The colonies of the Northmen on the west coast of Greenland continued to flourish until 1406, when the seventeenth and last bishop of SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 83 Garda was sent from Norway ; those on the eastern coast subsisted till 1540, when they were destroyed by a physical revolution which accumulated the ice in that zone from the 6oth degree of latitude. Thus a focus of Christianity not only existed in Greenland, but from it rays of faith momentarily illumined part of the territory now embraced in the United States, to leave it sunk in darkness for some centuries more. The Dublin Review, November, 1841. But there were other races or tribes of the Gomerites, Cimbrians, or Atlantians still more successful, in subsequent periods, in their dis coveries of the Atlantic islands and America. We allude to the Northmen, as they were called, scat tered along the north-western coast of Europe. These hardy, resolute, and unflinching adventurers, who relied on the traditions of their ancestors respecting the Atlantic territories, boldly put to sea in quest of the terra incognita. Several of their most heroic chiefs would seem to have made these desperate voyages of discovery, and indu bitable records exist of their successful result. Ortelius stated these facts in the year 1570, and early in the seventeenth century Myl and Hugo Grotius illustrated this theory. After showing that successive races had found their way to America from several countries of the Old World, they 62 84 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. proceeded to prove that the Northmen were entitled to especial credit for their Atlantic discoveries. The opinion of Grotius (as his biographer Burigni remarks) is that North America was peopled by persons from Norway, from whence they passed into Iceland, afterwards into Greenland, from thence to Friesland, then to Estoteland, a part of the American continent to which the fishers of Friesland had penetrated two centuries before the Spaniards had discovered the New World. He pretends that the names of those countries end with the same syllables as those of the Norwegians; that the Mexicans and their neighbours assured the Spaniards that they came from the North ; that there are many words in the American languages which have a relation to the German and Nor wegian, and that the Americans still preserve the customs of the country from which they originally sprang. . . . This theory respecting the American discoveries of the Northmen, or Norsemen, was confirmed and verified by many subsequent writers, and was pretty well established during the eighteenth century. . . . We hope we have now made our point namely, the high probability of those successive discoveries of America reported in the pages of history. We have not attempted to evince this point by any original arguments, which might appear as dreams of imagination, but by the concentration, accumulation, and orderly SUPPRESSED HISTORICAL FACTS. 85 arrangement of the whole existing evidence bearing on the topic. The strength of the reasoning is essentially cumulative : it results from the incor poration of the disjecta membra veritatis. Many ancient testimonies which, taken separately, might want weight and impressiveness, thus joined to gether in a consistent mass become almost in vincible. The whole result of probability redounds to the confirmation of each particular count of the plea, and moral conviction is enhanced by a law of increments similar to that of geometrical pro gressions. . . . Now the main part of this evidence, so consistent, yet so diversified, was extant in the age of Columbus, a most keen and scrutinizing inquirer into geographical questions. Indeed, we have reason to believe that some evidences of American discoveries existed in that day among his fellow-countrymen, which are now lost. What would be the natural result on such a mind but a fixed conviction, not merely derived a priori from the physical principles of our planet, but likewise a posteriori from the consent of historical evi dences, of the existence of America ? CHAPTER IV. THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. FOR some considerable time past, a great deal of interest has been excited by the deliberations, in various responsible quarters, as to what should be done to celebrate the approaching 4ooth anni versary of the voyage of Columbus, in 1492. Spain, anxious for a chance of once more holding up her head proudly among the nations, proposes to take the initiative in celebrating an event which carries her memory back to the time when she ruled also Germany and the Netherlands, and was the greatest Power in Europe, save only her spiritual superior, the Pope. But what have the other countries of Europe to say in the matter ? This chapter will attempt to present the events which led to and followed the voyage ot 1492, in all their vast significance and weighty import, as seen by English eyes, as they trace with respect and pride the growth of THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 87 free institutions such as can alone make mighty nations ; remembering also that the American nation has recently celebrated the Centenary of its Constitution, of which it is the highest possible praise to say that it has been able to celebrate a century of unshaken existence, and that it never had a greater prospect of celebrating, in after ages, a long series of such festivals than it has to-day. It is a happy coincidence that such a festival should precede the fourth centenary of the voyage of 1492. This voyage is often quoted as marking an epoch in the world s history ; and is usually spoken of as the Discovery of America. Whether this latter term is correct or not, we leave to the judgment of readers after hearing both sides of the question. We should consider it as prima facie a rather suspicious circumstance, if a man should visit the only two places where exact information as to the whereabouts of a certain thing could be obtained the more important of these visits being kept a profound secret and should after that go straight on the road to find that very thing, and thereby obtain for himself all the glory of a new discovery, to the exclusion of the rights of daring men who, 500 years before, had acquired the knowledge he strove to obtain the reputation of having been the first to give to the world ; while at the same time this man tells all manner of untruths as to the 88 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. considerations and reasonings that led him to go straight to find what he sought. Yet these, in plain language", are the charges we bring against Columbus. He was instructed in Rome how to go about the work that was required of him. He was sent to Iceland for further detailed information in 1477. He made up a lame tale as to his objects in going to find a western world ; and he justified the most wanton acts of cruelty by the plea of necessity or of profit, and by the consoling platitudes of religion. The visit to Iceland was most carefully con cealed, and we hear nothing of it, except in directly in letters which his son has quoted in his biography. In these letters, he casually mentions (as quoted in Washington Irving s " Life of Colum bus ") as follows : " In the year 1477, in February, I navigated 100 leagues beyond Thule, the southern part of which is 73 degrees distant from the equator, and not 63, as some pretend ; neither is it situated within the line which includes the west of Ptolemy, but is much more westerly. The English, principally those of Bristol, go with their merchandise to this island, which is as large as England. When I was there, the sea was not frozen, and the tides were so great as to rise and fall 26 fathoms." The importance and bearing of some of these THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 89 statements will be seen later. But here we have full proof that Columbus visited Iceland. According to the story usually told, and which entirely ignores the visit to Iceland, we are given to understand that Columbus had made up his mind that since the earth was round (or globular) in form, and certain places (the East Indies) could be reached by a long and intricate voyage to the East, the same places could therefore be reached by a corresponding voyage to the West and which he would imagine to be longer or shorter, accord ing as he had formed a greater or less estimate of the size of the terrestrial globe. This is a definite argument, and a perfectly reasonable one, as it stands. Our present astro nomical and geographical knowledge allows us to accept it without question, and without neces sarily impeaching the motives with which it was put forth. In approaching these subjects we are apt to make too great allowance for the inexact state of science in those days, and to charitably imagine that Columbus regarded the world as being about half the circumference it really is ; which assumption would, if correct, allow only one quarter the land and sea area our globe is now known to possess. For the working hypothesis promulgated by Columbus to the world was that by a certain number of days sailing to the West he would 90 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. come again to the lands already known to exist in the far East ; while in his contracts with his sailors, he proposed to sail only such a distance as we now know would bring him to a point as nearly as possible half-way round the globe from where he professed to be expecting to arrive. Was Columbus really so ignorant as all this? Or was it a false plan set forth to hide his real knowledge, secretly and clandestinely obtained? And was his real ultimate destination not the East Indies, but the shores to the South of that " Good Vinland," which has been described in books he would have certain access to when in Iceland and in Rome ? To answer these questions, it is necessary to consider how far the present popular notion of Columbus s " learned ignorance " is a correct one. That Columbus did not shrink from propounding false arguments when they served his turn, we shall have occasion presently to show. But as a matter of fact, Columbus had two theories before him, from which to take his choice, as to the shape of the earth and the possibility of extended naviga tion. He might, in the first place, adopt the ortho dox monkish notion the product of a thousand years of blindly following imaginary " authorities " on religion, and all other subjects whatever ; whose word was law, and to doubt whom was to be cursed with all the anathemas so humorously set forth in THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 91 the "Ingoldsby Legend" of the "Jackdaw of Rheims," and lately launched afresh on the devoted head of Dr. McGlynn. This monkish notion was that the earth must needs be flat, because there was not a word in the Scriptures to show that it was round ! To such an extent was this notion carried, that a map of the world drawn about 1320, by a monk of Hereford, England, and preserved in the cathedral of that place, actually represents a flat, circular earth, with Jerusalem in the centre, Eden at the top (the east), the Pillars of Hercules at the west, and the rest of the map diversified by fancy sketches of monkeys, bears, mermaids, hippogryphs, cen taurs, and other more or less mythical monsters. So strongly rooted was this view of cosmography, that even in the life-time of Columbus an ardent Spanish religionist spoke of the globular-earth theories as "dangerous doctrines." To escape from these trammels of conventional ideas, Columbus must have gone back to the days of the old Greek philosophers, when the Alexandrian- Greek culture was at its height, and engaged in ap plying the logical and mathematical principles arranged and codified by Euclid and others, to all problems upon which mathematical science in its then state could be brought to bear; and in re ducing to exact mathematical formulae the practical mechanical conclusions of Archimedes in an earlier 92 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. age. Here he would find records of measurements of meridians from Syene to Alexandria, and in other places, from which were deduced earth measure ments slightly in excess, rather than otherwise, of those we accept to-day.* With these approximate measurements before him, based on strictly correct scientific principles, Columbus never can have believed that the number of leagues sailing he stipulated for when arguing with his mutinous crews, whom he had all along deceived by false entries in his logbook, could have brought him to the East Indies, seeing that at that most critical juncture of his voyage he had the whole world between himself and the Indies he pretended to be in search of! But he fortifies his assumption by the mistaken notion of early mariners, as expressed in the cele brated letter of Toscanelli, that the countries * Eratosthenes held the known world to span one-third of the circumference of the globe, as Strabo did at a latter day, leaving an unknown two-thirds of sea ; and "if it were not that the vast extent of the Atlantic sea rendered it im possible, one might even sail from the coast of Spain to that of India along 4he same parallel." The spherical state of the earth was so generally accepted by the learned after the times of Aristotle and Euclid, that when Eratosthenes in the third century B.C. went to some length to prove it, Strabo, who criticised him two centuries later, thought he had needlessly exerted himself to make plain what nobody disputed. Eratosthenes was so nearly accurate in his supposed size of the globe that his excess over the actual size was less than one-seventh of its great circle. (From Justin Winsor s " Narrative and Critical History of America.") THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 93 already known comprised not less than two-thirds of the circumference of the earth, and that conse quently the voyage from Cape Verde to the Indies, westward, could not be more than half the length of the voyage eastward to the same places. Yet, knowing that observations of latitude are the most correct and obvious means of ascertaining the earth s diameter, he was not above inventing facts .that might lend colour to his false assumption, for personal and interested purposes, of the smaller size of the earth. Travel at that time was not so restricted, but that long meridians could be pretty accurately measured ; and in his letter to his son about his journey to Iceland he actually places that country ten degrees farther north than had already been correctly stated by more trustworthy authorities. That is to say, he represents that in passing over a certain number of miles he had traversed a greater arc that is, a larger proportion of the earth s cir cumference than was really the case ; thus giving a notion of the earth s size more in accordance with the theories he promulgated. Unfortunately for the pretensions of this man to be regarded as a shining light of either science, religion, or even of ordinary morality, it may be noted that it is quite impossible for any sailor used to astronomical observations to make so flagrant an error in even a single unaided eye-estimate of the 94 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. height of the polar star, or of the sun at noon. The rudest scale would give him his latitude to about one degree, and hence a whole ten degrees error cannot be other than totally inexcusable in a man of the profound scientific attainments usually claimed for Columbus. Had he been in any doubt, or had any wish to publish the literal bare truth, his journey from Spain to England, and thence to Ice land, would have given him a sufficiently accurate measure of the size of the earth. Another consideration showing that Columbus knew that the earth was much larger than he repre sented to be the case presents itself on an examina tion of the early maps of the world made after the discovery of America, more especially in connection with the line of demarcation traced by Pope Alex ander VI., when he divided the newly-discovered territories in all parts of the globe between Spain and Portugal. A good example of these early maps was placed prominently before the public at the Indian and Colonial Exhibition in London, 1886 ; and a photo-lithographed copy of the same map was on view at the Norse exhibit in the Ameri can Exhibition in London, during the summer of 1887, under the care of Miss Marie A. Brown, to whom the English-speaking race is eternally in debted for the light she has thrown on the doings and discoveries of their Viking sires. The map referred to is that known as the Diego THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 95 Ribero map of 1529, and belongs to the collection bequeathed by Cardinal Borgia in 1830 to the College of the Propaganda in Rome. The descrip tion appended to it at these exhibitions was incor rect in several particulars, as will be pointed out in Appendix to Chapter IV., on the early maps of America. The map shows the line of demarcation between the respective " spheres of influence," as we should say nowadays, of Spain and Portugal. This line passes from pole to pole completely round the earth, and is therefore indicated at two meridians 1 80 apart, one passing through Brazil, the other through the East Indies. On the score of accuracy, this map might not perhaps satisfy the geographical requirements of the modern scholar, for it only shows the east coast of America, with a portion of the west coast in the immediate neighbourhood of the Isthmus of Panama. But, what is more to our purpose, it shows almost correctly the proper amount of space (left, of course, blank), in which we can now, by superior knowledge, fill in the western portions of America, and the Pacific Ocean with its thousands of islets. The longitudes on this map run in some cases a few degrees out of strict correctness. But then it must be remembered that these mariners of old had no fine chronometers, recording logs, sub- 96 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. marine telegraphs, or any of the countless refine ments of later civilization, by which the longitude of any place can now be accurately determined. Now, it is quite evident that if in 1493, when the line was first drawn by Pope Alexander VI., or in 1494, when it was finally settled by the Treaty of Tordesillas (see Appendix on early maps), if at that time it was thought that Columbus had nearly reached the Moluccas, or some place not very far from the already known East Indies, it could not at the same time have been thought that the prolongation of that line on the other side of the globe would have left to Portugal those portions of the far East over which she claimed to exercise influence. And yet the dispute which began at this period, and was not settled until after the voyage of Magellan, was neither more nor less than what portions of the East Indies were given to Spain, and which to Portugal, by the prolonga tion into the Eastern Hemisphere of a line drawn, roughly speaking, through the mouth of the Amazon, in the Western Hemisphere. This line of argument shows clearly that almost immediately after the first voyage of Columbus it was already assumed that the rich spice islands of the East Indies were distant 180 of longitude, or one-half the circumference of the earth, from the islands newly discovered by Columbus. Now, it is impossible for anyone to affirm that THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 97 during the very short time between the first voyage of Columbus and the drawing of the line of demarcation ideas had so enlarged with regard to the earth s size as to assign it twice its pre viously assumed diameter, especially as it had not yet been circumnavigated. Had the theories originally propounded by Columbus to those who had not the necessary knowledge to answer them been recognised by the science of the day as correct, the American coast must have been placed near to the longitude of Japan ! Those in the council of Salamanca who had the most capable knowledge seem to have seen that there was nothing in his arguments as propounded, and to have suspected that he was in reality building on information of which he would not confess the sources. Yet, as good servants of the Church, they could not expose the man who had the countenance of Rome, and whose schemes worked so well on the cupidity of the court. America and its islands once discovered, all need for fraud or concealment ceases, and the earth in two short years resumes its original dimensions, as found by the Greek philosophers, and now again shown on Diego Ribero s map. No doubt the silent philosophers of the council of Salamanca, who heard what Columbus had to say, and decided that there was no force in his falsified and perverted arguments, were learned 7 98 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. (far more so than their fear of the Inquisition would allow them to confess) in the science of the Arabians, who had kept the ancient lore from destruction, though under the ban of Rome. To such mathematically-trained intellects the confused ideas of Columbus would appear but a Quixotic jumble of facts and fancies. They probably knew, but did not dare to urge, that if Columbus was to reach the Indies by a western route he would have twice as long a voyage as that which seemed already so long and terrible. Long after the one portion of the line of de marcation was fixed by the Treaty of Tordesillas, the other continued to be a cause of contention between Spain and Portugal. Each country main tained that the Moluccas were on its own side of the line, and tried to prove the correctness of its views. In 1494 Columbus, knowing that he was well within the Spanish sphere of influence, "made it a serious matter for anyone to doubt that Cuba was the continent, the beginning and end of the Indies, which it was possible to reach by land from Spain, which he compelled his crew and officers to declare on oath, with the prospect of having to pay a fine of 10,000 maravedis, or have their tongue cut off, in case of a denial. . . . The document is quoted in full in Navarrete " (Harrisse, " Notes on Columbus "). No doubt the reason which prompted this THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 99 arbitrary conduct was the desire to bring the whole East Indies within the Spanish hemisphere. It was to settle all such disputes that Magellan made his celebrated voyage round the world (1519- 22). Columbus during his life strove for the reputation of having discovered a new way to the Indies ; since his death he has obtained that ot having been the inspired discoverer of a new world these two ideas being about equally fal lacious. He set out with a preconceived idea of rediscovering territories which had formerly been well known, and used the notion of a short way to the Indies as a cover for these designs. That Columbus expected to find continents and islands before arriving at the Indies is amply and conclusively shown by the terms of his agreement with Ferdinand and Isabella. This document is interesting as bearing upon the adventurer s ideas of the nature and importance of the discoveries he expected to make, and also as a criterion of his inordinate and insatiable ambition. The agreement is here quoted from Sir Arthur Helps " Life of Columbus " : " The favours which Christopher Columbus has asked from the King and Queen of Spain in recompense of the discoveries which he has made in the ocean seas, and as recompense for the voyage which he is about to undertake, are the following : 72 ioo THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. " i. He wishes to be made admiral of the seas and countries which he is about to discover. He desires to hold this dignity during his life, and that it should descend to his heirs. " This request is granted by the king and queen. " 2. Christopher Columbus wishes to be made viceroy of all the continents and islands. " Granted by the king and queen. " 3. He wishes to have a share amounting to a tenth part of the profits of all merchandise, be it pearls, jewels, or any other thing, that may be found, gained, bought, or exported from the countries which he is to discover. " Granted by the king and queen. " 4. He wishes in his quality of admiral to be made sole judge of all mercantile matters that may be the occasion of dispute in the countries which he is to discover. " Granted by the king and queen on condition that this jurisdiction should belong to the office of admiral, as held by Don Enriques and other admirals. 11 5. Christopher Columbus wishes to have the right to contribute the eighth part of the expenses of all ships which traffic with the new countries, and in return to earn the eighth part of the profits. " Granted by the king and queen. " SANTA FE, IN THE VEGA OF GRANADA, " April 17, 1492." From the terms of these grants we again arrive THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 101 at the conclusion that Columbus had in his mind something very different from what he allowed to appear on the surface. His mention of seas, continents, and islands is, to say the least of it, rather remarkable for an adventurer who was merely attempting to reach by another route waters already visited and islands already known. His reference to continents is strange, and will be claimed by his admirers as an inspired piece of prophecy. But Columbus is not one of those characters to whom such inspirations easily come. The " practised slave-dealer," as Sir Arthur Helps characterizes him, was not the man to go on such a voyage for pure science s sake, any more than he visited Iceland, as one of his apologists makes out, to solve problems in hydrography ! What he did go to Iceland for will presently be seen. What opinion, then, after clearing away all these clouds of mist and deception, are we to form as to the real state of Columbus s mind when setting out upon his voyage across the Western seas ? That he really thought a few days or weeks sailing would bring him to the East Indies, we have shown that we cannot for a moment imagine. His voyage to Iceland, had it taught him nothing else, would have taught him different to this so much so, that he had to falsify his observations of latitude a whole ten degrees, as he had falsified his magnetic observations at the Azores, and as he afterward 102 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. falsified his log, and duped the islanders into going on board his ship to be sold as slaves. The real state of the case can easily be explained. Rome, always on the look-out for new lands to proselytize, became aware at the end of the tenth century that new shores lying to the southward of Greenland, and stretching far down into warmer latitudes, had been discovered by Icelandic navi gators. Gudrid, the wife of one of the early colonists of the new country (Thorfinn Karlsefne), who had heard of it from the first explorer, Leif, son of Erik the Red, had herself made a pilgrimage to Rome, and there received great attention while describing the new countries. Priests and bishops from the large and flourishing settlements of Green land, which contained a cathedral, three or four monasteries, and fifteen churches, had visited the new country of Vinland from the time of its dis covery until 1347. For some reason, probably the passing of Iceland and its colonies from a republican to a monarchical form of government, on their annexation to Norway (1262), and later to Denmark, together with the soporific influences of Romanism, these countries became neglected, and we are left in doubt as to the ultimate fate of their colonists. But traces of the Icelandic influences still remain in New England, the site of the ancient Vinland. There the descendants of one of the great Indian THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 103 tribes still retain, handed down with scrupulous fidelity and wonderful correctness, a mass of the old legends of the Eddas, the mythology of northern Europe. There, though under other names, are Odin and Thor in all their grandeur ; there are the apish tricks of the mischief-loving Loki. That these are not distinctively Indian legends is proved by their local survival only. They are completely different, too, in form and character from the Hiawatha-legends of the Ojibways ; while the personal attributes of the dramatis persona are Norse, not Indian. (See "The Algonquin Legends of New England," by Chas. G. Leland.) This complete correspondence of a vast mass of Indian legends with the Eddas leads one to infer at the very least a long-continued friendly inter course, if not actual fusion of race, between the Icelandic settlers and the Indian natives. These early discoveries being well known at Rome, the time had now arrived for making use of them. The power of the Church was, in the latter half of the fifteenth century, on the wane in the Old World. The northern countries had never been very steadfast in their allegiance to Rome, and successive sects of heretics, rising at various times and in various parts of Europe, foreshadowed the final great blow struck at the prestige of Rome by Luther and his contemporaries. The forces of 104 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. Islam, which had so long occupied the fairest provinces of Spain, were becoming a serious menace to Christendom from the East. Already was beginning to be felt that need of strenuous effort for self-defence which resulted in the next century in the founding of the Society of Jesus, whose ramifications soon penetrated every land, and still embrace the whole known globe within the subtle yet powerful arms of missionaries, teachers, and diplomatists, making the power of Rome more felt and feared to-day than ever in history. Yet in the Middle Ages the power of the Church was paramount within the limited area of Christen dom. The proudest moment for the pontifical sovereignty was when Pope Hildebrand placed his foot upon the neck of the prostrate Barbarossa in front of St. Mark s at Venice. Through a series of centuries, the armies of Europe had been launched against the infidels of Palestine as though under the personal command of the Vicar of Christ. But times were changing. The nations were already beginning to arouse themselves from the sleep of ages. The waning prestige of the Church must be kept up, if not in the Old World, in another which it should be her everlasting glory to discover. The path to new lands must be found, and once discovered, they must be held for Mother Church THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 105 and for the advancement of her prestige, by the care of her most subservient vassal. Among the records of former ecclesiastical dominion preserved in the Vatican, where they still exist, were found those relating to the lost colony of Vinland. Its formation had been duly recorded by Adam of Bremen (1002), who had the story from the lips of a nephew of King Sweyn ; and more recently in the saga of Thorfinn Karl- sefne, preserved in writing in a very beautiful manuscript, the Book of Flatoe, which at the time of Columbus s visit was still in Iceland, and is now preserved in the royal library at Copenhagen. There was no doubt as to where the country lay ; the route to it from Iceland was well known, and its situation was indicated on a chart in one of the sagas and further described as follows : " On the west of the great sea of Spain, which some call Ginnungagap, and leaning somewhat toward the north, the first land which occurs is the Good Vinland." The name of Ginnungagap is significant. It means the yawning gulf, or abyss, or chaos the primeval entity from which all nature was evolved. It gives us a point of touch with the ancient notion, current among the sailors of Columbus, that there was nothing beyond that sea that it was the boundary of the earth. The discovery of Vinland had superseded that io6 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. idea, though " some " still called the ocean by that name. Still, it had no such terrors for the Viking as it had for the poor frightened sailors of 500 years later, who were in hourly dread of tumbling off the edge of the earth into a bottomless abyss ! This was not the Norseman s way of thinking. As long as he could see the sea before him, wave after wave in endless succession, he knew he was in no greater danger than he had already passed through ; indeed, he was safer in the open sea than near a rock-bound coast ; while the more danger the greater the glory, and the more sagas to be made by skalds in his honour. No such feelings inspired the Christian sailor. True, poets and philosophers had imagined a land beyond that sea. The idea was tempting to the poetic and philosophic mind. But it was not Plato s Atlantis, it was not Aristotle s Antilla, that Columbus was setting forth to discover, but a more material prey for the cupidity of the Church and the avarice of princes. The existence of such a former colony on the other side of this terrible ocean being thus known to the Church by existing records, it became neces sary, for the furtherance of their plans, to find a man of determination and perseverance, ambitious and not too scrupulous, but with a certain amount of intelligence, and able to put on a show of reli gious enthusiasm, who should get together money THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 107 and ships and men, and force them, in spite of their fears, to cross the trackless ocean. The man who could carry out this scheme should be helped as far as the religious power could safely assert itself. He should be told where to go for advice, knowledge, and assistance of all kinds. He should be provided with admittance to the closets of priests and bishops, and to the audience-chambers of royalty. The State that should furnish what was wanted should be master of the new lands of half the globe, and free to enslave and torture and kill, under pre tence of Christianizing, the native inhabitants and rightful owners of the new countries. Such a man was found in Christopher Columbus, the former pirate and slave-trader a sort of Zebehr Pasha of his time and such a State was found in Spain under Ferdinand and Isabella. But an excuse was needed for crossing that great sea ; and the difficulty of reaching the Indies by the circuitous and hazardous voyage round the Cape was made the stalking-horse of the new pro ject. The doctrine of the rotundity of the earth had only a few years before been pronounced by a learned Spanish divine to be dangerous and per nicious. But this dangerous doctrine suddenly finds favour at court, and all men are required to believe in a globular earth, with that charming ver satility of faith required by the Church, but only to be attained by those to whom the immutable first loS THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. principles of science are unknown. These prin ciples had been proscribed, and their teaching punished with death at the stake, by which means experimental and inductive science had been buried for a thousand years under the night of so-called religion. The Arabs and Moors, it is true, had kept alight the torch of learning in Spain and Africa ; and the Greeks of the Eastern Empire still retained the memories of their past achievements, which, after the fall of Constantinople, were spread over Europe by wandering Estradiots. But Moors and Greeks alike were under the ban of the Church. The ancient learning was persecuted under the name of magic and superstition, and the flame of science was flickering, all but extinguished. Now^ by an irony of fate, the torch of science burns nowhere brighter than in those lands that were intended to be brought under the fetters of ignorant and corrupt superstition, masquerading in the sacred name of Truth ! The depth and power of such ignorance can best be seen when it is remembered that a few years after wards, in Germany, a student who had discovered a Greek Testament in the library of his university had to dig and delve for the meaning of the lan guage, just as modern explorers have to puzzle out cuneiform inscriptions or the still imperfectly de ciphered hieroglyphics of Hamath. And the word THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 109 went round that the Protestants had " invented a new language, which they call Greek !" So low had sunk the study of antique lore ! But before Columbus could proceed with the preparations for his voyage, he must first be coached in his part. The Book of Flatoe must be examined, and all further local information obtained that was possible, on the spot. The only mention of this visit to Iceland by Columbus himself has been already given at the beginning of this chapter. What he really saw and did there may be guessed from the following quotation from the learned Icelander, Finn Mag- nusen : " In the year 1477 Magnus Eiolfson was Bishop of Skalholt in Iceland; since 1470 he had been abbot of the monastery of Helgafell, the place where the oldest documents relating to Greenland, Vinland, and the various parts of America dis covered by the Northmen had been written, and where they were doubtless carefully preserved, as it was from this very district that the most dis tinguished voyagers had gone forth. These docu ments must have been well known to Bishop Magnus, as were their general contents through out the island, and it is therefore in the highest degree improbable that Columbus, whose mind had been filled with the idea of exploring a western continent since the year 1474, should no THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. have omitted to seek for and receive information respecting these early voyages. He arrived at Hvalfiord, on the south coast of Iceland, at a time when that harbour was most frequented, and it is well known that Bishop Magnus visited the neighbouring churches in the spring or summer." Even had he come to Iceland for any other purpose, Columbus was so ardent an inquirer after other people s writings and opinions that he is not likely to have neglected these chances ; for he was much more apt at quoting the ideas of others than at taking accurate observations himself and de ducing correct conclusions therefrom, as witness his false magnetic observations at the Azores, lead ing him to propound the remarkable theory of a pear-shaped earth, the protuberance being west ward i.e., towards the parts not yet explored. From the above-quoted records he would learn how the Vinland, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland coasts were sighted by Bjarni Herjulfson in 983, after which Leif and Thorwald, sons of Erik the Red, the colonizer of Greenland, made an exploration of the coasts and country near the present site of Boston, Mass., and wintered there. Later still, Thorfinn Karlsefne, with his wife Gudrid, founded a permanent colony there, and their son Snorre was born in Vinland. After Thorfinn s death and Snorre s marriage, Gudrid went to Rome, where she was well received, and her accounts ot THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. m the new countries beyond seas were listened to with attention by the holy fathers, since every dis covery offered an enlargement of the papal domain, and furnished a new field for the preaching of the Gospel. Gudrid afterwards returned to her son s house at Glaumbce, and there she had a church built, and passed the rest of her life as a religious recluse. Of course, to a system that could change the form of the earth from flat to globular at will, and then treat as mere matter of detail any dis crepancies as to its size, it was easy to suppress the records of Icelandic discovery. Hence im posture reigned everywhere supreme and un challenged. Armed with all necessary information and au thority, Columbus rapidly made his way to the confidences, first of Juan Perez, late confessor to Queen Isabella, then to the grand cardinal, who procured him an audience with the queen ; then he enlisted the services of Luis de St. Angel, who finally prevailed with the queen by an eloquent appeal to her ambition for the extension of her own power and dominion, and to her jealousy of other nations who might seize the chance and profit by it ; while affecting, at the same time, a solicitude for the glory of God and the exaltation of the Church. 112 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. These preliminary difficulties overcome, Colum bus at last set sail for the New World, hoping to strike some part of the coast that was known to stretch southward, and had even been explored as far as Florida, while some conjectured that it came near the coast of Africa. The exact island at which he first touched is uncertain, but it was one of the Bahamas, probably either the present San Salvador, or the one now called Cat Island. The sequel to the voyage of this ambassador of ignorance, greed, and fraud is well known. Great conquests were made ; confiding natives were massacred or entrapped on board ship to be deported to distant lands as slaves, while their countries were rifled of everything of value they contained. Ancient civilizations were ruthlessly destroyed, and the greatest barbarities committed in the name of religion. Let Mexico and Peru tell the story ! But far to northward a little cloud was rising and growing that was eventually, in a few short years, to obscure the fair horizon of Spain. A nation of mariners, descendants of the Vikings, and inheriting all their intense love of freedom and adventure, both by land, and more especially on the sea, swooped down in their tiny barks on the huge Spanish galleons bearing the treasures of Montezuma and the Incas. They burnt the Spaniards treasure-ships in their own finest harbour, THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 113 and laughed as they told how they had " singed the King of Spain s beard." These daring sea- rovers had early thrown off their allegiance to Rome, although one of their kings had received the title of defender of its faith, and their late queen had been the wife of a Spanish king, who had hoped to succeed to her throne. But her sister and successor now reigned over them, under whom there was not the slightest chance of Spanish or papal influence being tolerated in their country, which was consequently to be regarded as lost to Spain and the Church. But such a loss was not to be borne without a struggle, and an immense Armada was despatched to coerce this country into obedience. But the forces of nature and the pluck of the English seamen were too much for the un wieldy strength of the Spanish Armada, and the huge fleet was driven round the isles, scattered and wrecked upon the rocky shores. Had that Armada succeeded in its object, the clock of progress, that had just struck the hours of dawn, would have been rudely put back to darkest midnight. And what would then have been the fate of the infant America? Already brave and honest men had begun to cross the seas, not to harry and destroy, but to colonize and create, and soon a New England arose on the site of the Good Vinland of old, and destined to leave a more per manent and powerful mark on the world s history. 8 114 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. Had the Armada succeeded, all this would have been lost. The brute force of Spain would have grasped the whole of the New World, and held it under the domination of the Pope. For nothing .less than this was the true end and aim of Columbus s voyage in 1492, which America is to celebrate with rejoicing some two years hence. The effect on Spain herself of all these conquests, as seen by the light of after-ages, is deeply in structive, and may form a terrible warning to all futurity. The teeming wealth poured in by fleets of galleons filtered down from high to low, from rich to poor, and turned men s minds away from the cultivation of a fertile country to fancied El Dorados beyond seas. Slow but sure sources of competency or of wealth were given up for the possibilities of sudden riches, and the whole nation exemplified the proverb, "Lightly come, lightly go." A false pride raised the people above all honest work, while the gold and silver continued to pour in from the American mines; and lands once eminently fertile fell out of cultivation. An intolerant religion drove away honest and hard working artisans who dared to live according to their own convictions, while gilded idleness in high places completed the ruin by the most de plorable misgovernment. The busy hive of workers in Holland soon threw off the Spanish yoke ; one THE FULL*SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 115 by one other dependencies followed suit, until, at this hour, two large islands and a few very small ones are all that Spain has to show in the West Indies as the remnants of an empire upon which it could at one time be said that the sun never set. Fifteen republics on the mainland, and two more on an island, have arisen out of the ruins of that empire ; besides which, many islands, especially the very ones most associated with Columbus him self, have passed into the possession of other powers. The island first sighted by Columbus is now British territory. His principal early discovery, San Domingo is hopelessly divided by the strife of factions. " Sic transit gloria mundi" Other portions of the Spanish dominions have joined themselves to a greater republic than any of those before alluded to, and are now enjoying a wonderful prosperity they could never have attained, .or would have been many decades in reaching, under less happy auspices. And what do we see now ? After four centuries of struggle, truth and freedom are still threatened. Yet in the end they are bound to be triumphant. America boasts that she can brook no master, be he king or priest. Yet insidious enemies are con stantly on the watch to steal in under cover of a simulated patriotism. Let America wake in time. Let her become alive to the nobility and dignity of her Viking ancestors, and prepare to assert that 82 n6 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. dignity before all the world. But the example must be set her by England, a land that has never forgotten how greatly her own earlier history was influenced by Scandinavia, and how large a portion of the best blood of her people is derived from the Vikings of old, whose achievements have left their mark on every part of her coasts, and over by far the greater portion of the country. The Scandinavian past has become part of England s national being, and the influence of the Viking spirit was never so plainly seen as when it impelled her to defy the Spanish power and gain a foothold in the New World, which had been be stowed for ever upon Spain by the Pope. America, on the contrary, would rather cut loose from her past than bear it in constant remembrance. She rejoices in having separated herself from Europe, and would prefer to remember only the War of Independence, forgetting the ties of coi - sanguinity, some dating from before, and others since that war, which should bind the two con tinents in close and friendly relations. The vision of a Greater Britain, of a reunion of the English-speaking race, is a superb ideal, and one which ought to be carried into realization. But this cannot be accomplished until Americans shall have completely given up their pan-American delusions. The whole commercial diplomacy of the United States, resulting in the McKinley Bill THE FULL SIGNIFICANCE OF 1492. 117 and the Columbus celebration, has been employed to raise, stone by stone, an insurmountable barrier against England, contrary to all natural and rightful instincts. Such a course is founded on no natural elements of right or justice, and must inevitably fail. JOHN B. SHIPLEY. CHAPTER V. A FITTING CELEBRATION. IT has many times been remarked that we live in an age of exhibitions, and it may be added with equal truth that the present era is marked by an especial fondness for celebrations. Nearly every year some important event in the history of one or other of the great family of nations receives due commemoration as a landmark of domestic or inter national progress. A few years ago Europe rejoiced with Austria over the rolling back of the tide of advancing Islam from the very gates of Vienna two centuries before. Last year France celebrated the centenary of her first republic, while the monarchies of Europe looked on askance. Eng land has celebrated the defeat of the Armada, though not with the grandeur and national unity befitting so imposing an event in the history of our country. The United States have celebrated 76 with an exhibition, and the centennial of the Con- A FITTING CELEBRATION. 119 stitution with a Pan-American Conference, which was apparently intended as the beginning of an attempt to bring the whole of the New World within the dominion of that Constitution. The same aim is apparent in the preparations for the exhibition by which the voyage of Columbus in 1492 is to be celebrated at Chicago in 1893. The real reason for wishing to hold a Columbian Exposition, as it is officially styled, is to place be fore the eyes of Spanish America that is, of the Central and South American nations a manifesta tion of the greatness and glory of the United States, and the benefits that these republics would gain by ceasing to trade with the Old World, and giving their custom to the industries of the New. In making these calculations for the future, how ever, American politicians forget that the effect of protection by high tariffs is to raise the prices of American-made goods to such an extent that these latter are thereby shut out of all foreign markets where they have to contend with goods made by nations who do not artificially enhance the prices of their own produce, and where stern competition forces manufacturers to sell their wares at the lowest possible figure. The high tariff is in itself an ad mission that American manufacturers are unable to compete with their European rivals, even when these latter have the disadvantage of living 3,000 miles from their American customers. 120 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. Taking this view of the matter, the chances of the World s Fair, as the inauguration of a new commercial era of trade with South America, do not appear very favourable ; while if it be imagined that the world in general, including the great manu facturing nations of Europe, will send goods for exhibition, it must be remembered, on the other hand, that Congress has recently passed a measure having for its avowed object the raising of the already high tariff to such a preposterous pitch as totally to exclude certain classes of European goods, and to greatly check the importation of nearly every conceivable article of commerce. The threat has even been made that, if these alterations are not sufficient to achieve the desired object, the tariff will be raised again and again, until foreign, i.e., European, goods are completely excluded from the markets of the United States. In the face of such treatment, it is not likely that English and other European merchants will incur vast expendi ture in sending goods to a country that is deter mined not to buy from them, especially as these same tariffs act against the United States in com petition with England in the markets of South America. English firms could therefore spend their money to much greater advantage in opening markets elsewhere ; and if they know their own interests they will be conspicuously absent from Chicago in 1893. A FITTING CELEBRATION. 121 The prolonged negotiations as to the location of the exhibition furnish many examples of methods foreign to English notions. The fair was given to Chicago, lest it should work in favour of the Democrats if it went to New York and was held simultaneously with the Presidential election in 1892. The site of the fair at Chicago has been virtually determined by the overwhelming influence of railway companies and land speculators. The greatest uncertainty prevails even at the present moment as to where the fair is to be placed ; for although the site has been provisionally fixed after interminable discussion, no one knows how long it will "stay fixed," or how soon serious difficulties will crop up to prevent the use of the public parks for the purposes of an exhibition, or misunder standings may arise with the railway companies, on whom depends the conveyance of visitors between the two portions into which the exhibition will probably be divided. Every unbiased spectator seems to consider it a fight between rival "boodlers" and more or less interested corporations, and no one thinks it safe to commence any active pre parations. One State only California has any adequate organization formed for framing an ex hibit, and everyone seems to look on with apathy except the few insiders who count on making money by the enterprise. For the plan of the fair preposterous ideas of 122 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. big tents and impossible towers have been put forward by those who expect to make fortunes out of architectural or constructive work. One great feature of the scheme involves the reclamation of a portion of Lake Michigan, and the filling up of part of the city s fine outer harbour, constructed at great expense, in order to make room for a section of the fair, which is to serve as a sort of vestibule, from which visitors are to be conveyed free of charge to the larger area at Jackson Park. But how the necessary filling-in is to be accomplished is what no two authorities can altogether agree upon. Some are all for driving rows of piles and building their exhibition over the water, like the ancient lake-dwellers and modern Malays. Others advise filling it up solid with rubbish. Neither side can satisfy the engineers of the fair that the lake will not swallow up all the money raised for the fair itself, and perhaps the buildings as well, if they should ever get erected on such a treacherous foundation, together with the exhibitors, their wares, the historical relics, and the "countless millions " of visitors that the fair is confidently expected to attract. Such a celebration, conducted on these prin ciples, used for petty personal advantages, and being in its conception and execution a virtual denial of all obligations or ancient ties to the Old World, may be indeed a fitting celebration of a A FITTING CELEBRATION. 123 discovery conducted on eminently false principles, and leading to results that were absolutely dis cordant with all the elements which have combined to form the United States of to-day. But it is out of all character, considering the antecedents of the nation by which it is held, and the part taken by nearly every country in Europe, but above all by England, in laying the firm and sure foundations of all that is best and greatest in that nation s present condition. Nothing that can now be ob served in the general aspect of the country suggests a Spanish discovery ; the last remaining institution distinctively Spanish in its origin or introduction was destroyed by the proclamation of emancipation issued by Abraham Lincoln, at the close of one of the most sanguinary civil wars on record. This event formed the final victory in the long conflict that had been waged for centuries between the representatives and descendants of the Northern discoverers and the ideas and traditions which had been transmitted from the Spanish conquistadors through generations of settlers who had adopted the habits and usages of those to whom a Southern climate was more familiar, and who found in slavery, for example, a means of easily enriching themselves in spite of the enervating effects of the climate. And yet, after all the sacrifices entailed by this heroic yet deplorable conflict, we find an attempt made, within thirty years of its close, to 124 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. celebrate in a Northern city the beginnings of the Spanish influence in America, in order to enter into closer relations with countries of Spanish origin and settlement, to the exclusion of all in fluence on the part of those nationalities to which the Republic owed its origin and importance. It would manifestly be impossible to assign to each European nation its exact and rightful share in the founding and building up of the great nation now known under the name of the United States of America ; but it may be mentioned that long before the advent of the vast tide of immigration from every country in Europe that has set in since the development of steam navigation brought the journey within the reach even of persons of the most limited means the chief nations of Europe had sent colonists to the New World, planting on it the first germs of communal existence, which have since grown and blossomed into full nationality. England had fringed the Atlantic sea board with groups of colonies formed by men of strength of body and will, who trained up their children in hardiness and independence. Some came as religious refugees persecuted Puritans, Quakers, and Catholics. Some were attracted by the anticipation of wealth, and settled under the auspices of trading companies or under the pro tection of nobles and princes, to whom vast terri tories had been granted by the crown. The hard- A FITTING CELEBRATION. 125 ships endured by the early settlers can scarcely be imagined by those who read the story at their ease, but even these contributed to the building up of the stout and fearless manhood of the early colonial times. The Dutch, always early in the field of new and profitable enterprise, soon formed a settlement at the mouth of the Hudson, and laid the first foun dations of the future commercial capital. Nearly at the same time the Swedes, in pursuance of a plan initiated by the great Gustaf Adolf, and carried out under the guidance of his wise and trusted chan cellor, Axel Oxenstjerna, founded on the Delaware a free State, which was designed to be a refuge for the oppressed of all lands who were persecuted for their adherence to the reformed religion. This was in actual existence for several years before Penn received a grant of the same territory in 1681, and the Swedes, who are a very numerous body in the States, now celebrate the landing of their ancestors on the Delaware on a special date (September i4th), which they style " Forefathers Day." The French were scarcely behind the English in perceiving the advantages offered by the new con tinent. One of the first names applied to this part of the New World, not yet called North America, was Nova Francia, or New France, and the French strove hard to make it deserve the name. The voyages of Jacques Cartier along the St. Lawrence, 126 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. between 1534 and 1544, though not immediately productive of important results, were followed up at a later period by French activity along the coast between Nova Scotia and the Kennebec, and along the great waterway which stretches far into the interior of the continent, and terminates in the great lake system. From their advanced points on the lakes they soon crossed to the tributaries of the Mississippi, and followed that river to its mouth, where attempts were made to establish a colony. These were ultimately successful, and ere long English extension was menaced by a chain of settlements stretching from Louisiana to Canada. In the war which -became inevitable, George Wash ington, then a young man, was honourably and creditably engaged ; the result of it was that all the country east of the Mississippi was secured to the English. The country to the west passed into the nominal possession of the Spaniards, but traces of Spanish civilization are as hard to find here as in other parts of the country, save for a few words that have slipped into the language by the back door of frontier slang, and such results as have been accomplished by the labours of Spanish padres among the Indians of the pueblos. The English were now virtually the rulers of America. The War of Independence was between members of the same race, sometimes even between members of the same family, each party in its own A FITTING CELEBRATION. 127 way being animated by patriotic sentiments. The English troops fought for their own country at home, the colonists for their new country, which they had made their home. The memory of this war has left a smouldering rancour in the minds of the victorious Americans, which a century of intercourse on equal terms has not completely removed, and this unfortunate bitterness of feeling gives an added friction to all commercial and political relations be tween the two nations. Part of this may be due to the oft-quoted conduct of England during the Civil War, but Americans who urge this forget that the feeling of the nation, outside of political and com mercial circles, was strongly with the North and in favour of the abolition of slavery. It is as untrue and unjust to say that Englishmen were all sym pathizers with the South, as it would be for a foreigner to assert that, before the war, Americans were a nation of slaveholders and traders in human flesh. There are always two parties in a nation, diametrically opposed and manifesting totally dif ferent tendencies ; neither of these can be taken as representing the other, and still less the whole nation. The result of this exaggerated dislike of England has left its mark on the present character of the nation, for one of the first things to strike a stranger is the extremely composite character of the popula tion, which is partly due to this very cause. Im- 128 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. migrants from continental Europe have been made welcome, and those from Ireland, in particular, are received with open arms, and regarded as meriting the special confidence of the whole nation, because they too had cause to complain of English inter ference and exactions. The Irish now form the visible government of many large cities ; the police force, the city councils, and the mayoralties are filled with Irishmen, who also, through the School Boards, control the education of the young. This heterogeneous character of the population of the United States does not, however, materially weaken the truth of the assertion that the nation as a whole is of English origin, and that it ought to acknow ledge this in preference to all contending or con flicting claims. The one fact that the language most widely spoken in the States, and retained as the official language of the country, is not only English, but is always known by that name, and admitted to be English, even in a country that objects to all else that bears the English name is in itself a daily reminder and an ever-present proof that it is to English energy and enterprise that America owes all that it holds dear, and even its very existence as a nation. Next to the English come the closely-allied races of the Germans and Scandinavians. These three great elements, forming the main bulk of the whole population, reduce the influence which A FITTING CELEBRATION. 129 can in any way be attributed to the South European nations to a very insignificant fraction. All these great constituent elements of the States came in consequence of the opening up of the great trade route by Cabot and his English followers, not in consequence of the discoveries of South America and the islands by Columbus and the Spaniards. By the great northern route was brought to America all that was needed to transform a wilderness into a civilized country. This transformation has been no light or easy matter. It has taken all the energies of the most enterprising race the world has ever produced full three hundred years to accomplish. And it is still in process of comple tion. The aborigines, confined within their fast- diminishing reservations, are treated with as much contempt as they once excited awe in the minds of the original settlers. Soon they will be a vanished race, and no section of the country will be found into which the Pullman car and the palace hotel are unable to penetrate. The celebration of the discovery of the route to America should be also the celebration of the labours by which the present state of the continent has been slowly and painfully evolved from that which existed four hundred years ago. It should demonstrate clearly, for all the world to see, how the work was commenced, how carried on, and how far the present condition of the country 9 130 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. repays the arduous toil that has been expended upon it. To compare the results achieved in a new country with those of ancient civilizations deep-rooted in the long-settled lands of the Old World might seem scarcely fair, were it not that the New World itself challenges the comparison, and even asserts loudly its own superiority to any and all of the " effete " nations to whom it is in debted for its start in life. The conditions here set forth are in no respect fulfilled by the exhibition, or "World s Fair," as it is commonly called, which is to be held at Chicago in 1893. Its only basis is a shameful and audacious compromise : " We ll honour your hero if you ll purchase our goods," is in effect the message of the United States to the South American Republics. " No foreign barbarians need apply, except as admiring spectators of American great ness," is the Chinese welcome extended by America to all the rest of the world, especially Europe. With everything in her favour, and all competi tion sedulously excluded, it would indeed be an ignominious collapse for America if she failed to make a creditable exhibition of her vast and varied natural economic resources. Yet such a collapse is freely and openly predicted by many who have witnessed the flagrant mismanagement and apparent incapacity of those who are entrusted A FITTING CELEBRATION. 131 by the nation with the carrying out of this great undertaking. Since the United States is not willing to pay due respect to those who undertook the labours of which Americans now enjoy the fruits, let us see in what other way the great events outlined in these pages can fittingly be celebrated. If Eng land desires that her brave sons should be duly honoured, she must herself take the initiative. The challenge thrown out by America must be met and accepted, as it is right and fitting that it should, on some spot which is intimately con nected with the events designed to be commemo rated. For this purpose no locality is more suit able than Bristol, and no date more appropriate than 1897 ; for it was from that port, in the beginning of May, 1497, that John and Sebastian Cabot sailed on that memorable voyage, during which, on Midsummer Day, they discovered New foundland, and shortly after the inhospitable coast of North America. Bristol is a large and flourish ing seaport, although not now ranking next to London in importance, as it did in the early days of England s commercial greatness. Since then it has declined into a " somewhat sleepy but venerable old port," as the Athenceum called it in 1838, and has again risen through the enterprise at last shown in the formation of new docks at the mouth of the^ Avon, and is making creditable 92 132 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. attempts to regain its ancient prestige. During the French wars of Edward III., Bristol was called upon to furnish 24 ships and 600 men, which was only one ship and 62 men less than the quota furnished by London itself. In the fifteenth century the great merchant Canynge sent his ships to every part of the known world, and one of these, the Mary and John, was of 900 tons burden. He was the second founder of the Church of St. Mary Redcliffe, in which he was buried, and which also contains the bone of a large whale, about which some absurd stories are told, but which has been more probably identified with the one which Sebastian Cabot presented to the city on his return from his voyage of dis covery. The appearance of Bristol to a stranger is very peculiar and striking. Many English towns seem to take one back into bygone centuries, whilst others appear as obtrusively modern as an American city. But Bristol gives the impression of living in two centuries at once; the bustle of business contrasts oddly with the Elizabethan houses and yet more ancient churches that are visible from almost every point. Some of the houses and many of the churches were no doubt familiar to Cabot four hundred years ago. The winding streets, circling and crossing within the line of the ancient walls, of which they indicate the A FITTING CELEBRATION. 133 course, are evidently the modern representatives of the very thoroughfares which Cabot must have trodden. Modern Bristol is well adapted for the holding of a large and important celebration. It has wealthy citizens, excellent public institutions, and is both highly interesting in itself and situated in the midst of most attractive surroundings. It has also a traditional connection with America, independent of the discoveries, for in 1838 it sent off the first steamship, the Great Western, that ever made the voyage to New York. It still main tains a considerable trade with the United States, the West Indies, and other parts of the New World, especially in the importation of articles of food. Bristol has always been mindful of her ancient glory, and it can scarcely be doubted that she will equal the high expectations that will in evitably be raised by the holding in 1897 of a worthy celebration of the achievements of a man who has been claimed as one of her own sons, and who was certainly accompanied and followed to the new lands by hardy mariners of Bristol. Other Bristol men should at the same time receive due honour John Jay, who in 1480 fitted out the earliest English expedition to search for Western lands of which we have any record ; Thomas Lloyd, who commanded this expedition ; and Martin Pring, who sailed from Bristol in 1603, and was " the first European who cultivated, and 134 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. for a time resided in and hallowed, the spot (Plymouth) which the English pilgrims from Leyden, seven years afterwards, under Robinson, landed upon and made classic ground " (Nicholls and Taylor, " Bristol, Past and Present "). The exhibition to be held in commemoration of this long connection of Bristol with the Western trade should be so arranged as to present a com plete view of the various stages in the discovery of America. It is not an event that would have to be celebrated so much as an effort, sustained in spite of every obstacle during four hundred years, to found on the Western continent a new civilization which should have all the advantages and none of the faults of the older ones upon which it was based. To make it complete, it must begin at the beginning. A Viking hall, such as is described in a former page, should be erected for the display of a large and attractive exhibit illustrating the earliest discoveries of America by the Northmen. Collec tions of arms and armour, household utensils, and models of the ships that have been unearthed in Scandinavia, should be obtained from the great museums in Copenhagen, Stockholm, and Chris- tiania, as well as from Iceland and from smaller collections in the various places where the North men established themselves. Specially interesting would be a department devoted to the graphic elucidation of their activity upon our own shores ; A FITTING CELEBRATION. 135 for there are abundant evidences of their repeated visits or continued presence on almost every portion of the coastline of Great Britain and Ireland, and more especially on the islands with which those shores are fringed. Such a collection would also illustrate the long period of the colonization of Greenland by the Norsemen, as well as their settle ments on the shores of New England and other parts of America. Still more extended would be the scope of an exhibit illustrating the voyages of the Cabots and their followers. It would include the state of the English marine at the close of the fifteenth century ; the character of the ships then used, and in which the discovery was made ; the amount of Bristol commerce at that period, and a comparison with that carried on by other British and foreign ports ; the world-wide sphere of activity of her great merchant, William Canynge, and generally a review of all the attendant circumstances. A collection should be made of books, records, and maps bearing upon these and other early voyages, and of all documentary evidence illustrative of the early period of England s commercial and maritime greatness. If elaborate historical displays were desired, there might be pageants representing the court of Queen Elizabeth at the time of the Armada, this event being taken as marking the fall of the 136 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. supremacy of Spain, and the establishment of that of England in the waters of the New World; the way being thus opened for the colonizing expeditions which had already been attempted by the more adventurous, and in one of which Sir Humphrey Gilbert had already lost his life. The determined resistance offered by Queen Elizabeth to the arrogant pretensions of the Spaniards had thus a most important bearing on the whole subsequent history of America. Next in logical sequence come the exhibits illus trative of the early voyages to America during the colonizing period, which began with the seventeenth century, showing the part taken, as outlined above, by the different nations of Europe, with maps show ing the various settlements formed, and the gradual extension of knowledge as to the geography and natural resources of North America, and its conse quent capabilities as the home of a new and advanced civilization. The later history and present condition of our own colonies on the North American continent might well claim due attention. Much useful and valuable instruction might thus be imparted as to the capabilities of these portions of our empire. The lessons taught by the Colonial Exhibition in 1886 will not soon be forgotten ; but between that and the celebration of 1897 eleven years will have elapsed, and it may fairly be anticipated that great A FITTING CELEBRATION. 137 strides will have been taken during that period. The hostile attitude of the United States with regard to the tariff question ought to give an impulse to English trade with the colonies, especially when they can make so splendid a showing for themselves as Canada and the rest did at the exhibition of 1886. Nor should the United States be in any way neglected or left out. One great result of the exhibition would be to teach the inhabitants of that portion of America the history of their own country ; to remind them that they have to thank England and Queen Elizabeth for the destruction of the Spanish power they now extol so highly, before genuine civilization could be established on free and enlightened principles. They have to thank Englishmen for the settling of the colonies which in 1776 proved themselves strong enough to declare their independence of the mother country, and for the growth and prosperity of the principal centres of commerce on their eastern coast. The men of 76 owed their spirit of independence to their English blood, no less than to their nurture in the newly -settled colonies of America, and the free vigorous life to which they were accus tomed. In return, an opportunity would be afforded to the United States to show in a far more compre hensive way than at the fiasco of 1887, whether 138 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. really has such transcendent merits as would place it not only in the front line of nations, but, as it boasts, far ahead of all others, beyond even the most advanced nations of Europe. We have shown that there will be no chance for this to be satisfactorily done at Chicago, for all advantage or inducement that might lead European nations to exhibit there in 1893 is cut off by the new Tariff Bill. The more intelligent Americans are beginning to see this now, when the mischief has been done. " Why," cries Kate Field s Washing ton, brightest and best of American journals, " should foreign manufacturers exhibit in the United States goods which will not be imported on account of increased duties ? Why should the great artists of Europe combine to make our fair of 1893 a wonderful artistic Kindergarten for the benefit of this continent, when Congress has not had the decency to heed the prayer of every artist and artisan in the United States ?" The one-sidedness of the action of the United States is especially evident when it is considered that that country does not by any means desire to be excluded from the markets of the Old World, where her produce is every year finding a larger and readier sale. It would not be surprising if European consumers were to make efforts to supply themselves with produce that has hitherto come from the United States, either by finding A FITTING CELEBRATION. 139 localities nearer at hand where certain kinds of that produce can be grown, or by fostering trade with South America by purchasing largely from that continent. We must all sincerely hope, how ever, that such measures may prove unnecessary. Just as a large proportion of the best English opinion was utterly against the Southern slave holders, so there is in America a strong tide of public feeling that is entirely opposed to the high tariff, knowing as they do, or as they will soon realize, that the tariff is in its effects a virtual tax upon the home consumer, rather than upon the foreign manufacturer. The secret of America s growth, and the basis of its present position, lies in its fertile soil ; all classes in the State are depen dent upon the agriculturist. This is not so plainly visible in England, where the manufac turing interests have assumed immense proportions as compared with the farming interests ; but this has only been possible because the farmers had a fertile land across the seas where they could be free from obnoxious land-laws, and have unre stricted development for their industry, and full reward for their exertions. If by a short-sighted and mistaken policy of self-interest the manu facturers think to grasp everything for themselves in the United States, they will soon find that they have struck a fatal blow at the very source and fountain-head of their own prosperity. 140 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. Another department of the exhibition might be devoted to showing how the discovery of America has reacted on the Old World, and how natural products of either hemisphere have been trans planted to the other, and given rise to large and widely-spread industries. The grand lesson to be learnt from this would be, that although the Old World did for a long period get on well enough without the New, and might learn to do so again, yet neither would gain by the separation, or would willingly attempt the experiment. The determi nation to live apart would soon work its own cure ; each would find how necessary the other was to its comfort and well-being. The discovery of America has a wider meaning and a deeper significance for the world at large than is implied by the mere words themselves ; and the more Americans show that they are alive to the common interests between themselves and the rest of mankind, the more it will redound to their own advantage, and to the honour and glory of the great nation of whose history they are the makers, and of whose future they are the cus- odians. JOHN B. SHIPLEY. APPENDICES. APPENDIX TO CHAPTER II. THE following is the memorial to Congress in support of Miss Marie A. Browne s plea, signed by over 1,000 influential persons, including presidents of various historical societies, as mentioned in the introduction to this book. " To the Honourable the Senate and House of Repre sentatives of the United States, in Congress assembled : " The undersigned respectfully represent : That in the approaching celebration at Washington, in 1889, in honour of the Centennial of the Constitu tion of the United States, it would be fitting to include a commemoration of the discovery of America by Leif Erikson, the Icelander, in A.D. 1000, and to allow Iceland, a proud and flourishing republic at the time of the discovery 142 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. of America, to take an honoured place in the Jubilee of Republics in 1889. " That, although the fact of this discovery is based on the authentic documentary evidence of the Ice landic sagas, there is a vast amount of evidence in the shape of documents, records, and manuscripts of all descriptions that has been buried for centuries in the libraries at Rome in fact, the Church annals of six centuries, containing the minute details of the ecclesiastical work and establishments, the suc cession of bishops for 263 years, etc., etc., in the colonies of Greenland and Vinland. These facts, relating to the discovery of America, and comprising the entire early history of this country, it is the right of the American nation to possess and to in corporate in its archives. " That the work Mr. B. F. Stevens has been com missioned by Congress to perform, namely, * the preparation of an Index of all the documents of American concern in private or public archives of Great Britain, Holland, France, and Spain, that accumulated between the years 1763 and 1783, be rendered complete and perfect by the preparation of a like Index of all the records and documents bearing upon the discovery of America in the year 1000, and the colonies that existed in Vinland and Greenland until the year 1540, the date of their extinction. " That the claim of Spain and Italy, in favour of APPENDIX TO CHAPTER II. 143 Christopher Columbus, extolled by these nations as the discoverer of America, be suspended unti all the facts in the case are put in the possession of the American Government, in order that it may be fairly and justly proved how great were the discoveries, explorations, and settlements of the Icelanders, how far they made their discoveries known to the world, and to what extent these dis coveries and settlements had been known and recorded in Rome, thus providing Columbus with the knowledge that made his expedition a suc cessful one, confirmed as this was by the corrobora- tion he found in the archives of Iceland, during his visit there in February, 1477. "Wherefore the undersigned respectfully beg that Congress will authorize a thorough investiga tion of these records in the Vatican and other Roman libraries, and appropriate a sum suitable for the carrying out of that work and for a worthy Icelandic celebration, in 1889, in commemoration of the discovery, this to be according to the plan for a Viking Exhibition submitted by Miss Marie A. Brown, and which would comprise the erection of a Viking hall, in which would be displayed the relics from the Viking period, the only way to re surrect this brilliant past (the precise period of the discovery of America) being by means of an historical exhibition, for which, fortunately, all the essentials are to be found in the museums and 144 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. splendid collections of Europe, the swords and shields of the Vikings, the beakers in which they drank their toasts, the massive gold armlets and necklaces and ornate belts, specimens of their art in wood-carving, tapestry, etc., and of their maritime skill in the very craft in which these masters of the world ranged the seas." APPENDIX TO CHAPTER IV. Note on the Early Maps of America. References have been made in the foregoing pages to the numerous maps which illustrate (or in some cases obscure) the early voyages to America. Without attempting to give a catalogue of these ancient and most interesting documents, we may here mention a few of the more important ones bearing upon our subject. In spite of the doubtful attitude of the Church, which is ably described in Whewell s " History of the Inductive Sciences," vol. i., book iv., it was not unusual to represent the earth as a globe, and we have therefore to mention some interesting specimens of terrestrial globes, two of which, the Behaim (Nuremberg) and the Laon globes, embody the state of knowledge immediately preceding the voyage of Columbus. The earliest post-Columbian globe is that preserved in the Lenox Library, New York. Descriptions of this and of the other globes APPENDIX TO CHAPTER IV. 145 here referred to will be found in the article " Globe " in the "Encyclopaedia Britannica." A series of globes, or rather of segments or gores for forming globes, were made by Johann Schoner of Carlstadt, the first of which, made in 1515, disputes with one by another maker (1514-17) the honour of being the first representation of the New World on which the name America is inscribed. This name is applied to South America only, the north coast and a short stretch of the east coast being all that is indicated as known. Just north of the western extremity of the South American continent is a country marked Nova on the one globe and Farias on the other, and Zipangri( Japan) is shown a short distance to the westward. Japan was then only known to Europeans by the descriptions of Marco Polo, who places it at a distance of 1,500 miles eastward from Zaiton, a large seaport, identified by Yule with Chin-cheu, ninety miles south-west of Fu-chau. A note on the map of Ruysch, 1508, indicates this position for Japan, and implies that it was confused with Hispaniola. In the second of Schoner s globes (1520) Cuba is marked as a land separate from Isabella, which was another name applied by the Spaniards to the same island. Of this error more will be said pre sently. In the third globe (1523) the name Isabella disappears, and that of Florida appears for the first time, commemorating the discovery of this 10 146 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. portion of the American continent by Juan Ponce de Leon in 1513. This globe traces the route of Magellan s expedition (1519-22), which was under taken in order to solve the difficulties then felt in determining how far the Spanish and Portuguese sovereignties extended respectively in the direction of the Moluccas. From the contemporary descrip tion of this voyage it appears that, even at that early period, before the world had been circumnavigated, it was generally believed that the line of demarca tion passed east of the Moluccas, thus showing a very correct idea of the earth s real size, as opposed to the unscientific hypotheses put forth by Columbus. Magellan, however, claimed that the Moluccas were in the Spanish half of the globe, and made his voyage in order to attempt to prove his view of the case. (See " Johann Schoner von Karlstadt," by H. Stevens and C. H. Coote.) Turning now to the consideration of maps, we come first to the celebrated chart of Juan de la Cosa, made in 1500, after his second visit to the New World. He traces carefully the discoveries of Columbus to the north-west, of which he draws a coastline, probably intended for that of Asia, and against the northern portion of this coast he places five British flags with several names, such as Cabo de Ynglaterra, and the words " Mar descubierta por Inglesi " (sea discovered by the English). This is an undoubted reference to the discoveries of Cabot, APPENDIX TO CHAPTER IV. 147 and it may be noted that he is more careful to show these than to credit the Portuguese with the discovery of any part of South America, for he places Spanish flags very near to Cape St. Roque, and indicates the land reached by Portuguese mariners as a large island of an irregular square shape, some distance to the eastward of the South American coast. The next map gives us the Portuguese side of the question. It is ascribed to Alberto Cantino (1502), and bears the title "Carta da Navigar per le isole novam te tr(ovate) en le parte del India." On this map the line of demarcation between Castile and Portugal is conspicuously drawn, giving to Portugal the whole of Brazil from the mouth of the Amazon, as well as the Newfoundland discoveries of Cabot, which are here shown as " Terra del Rey de Portuguall." This map and others of Portuguese origin exhibit a peculiar error with regard to Cuba, which is drawn twice over, once as an island, and once with its coastlines prolonged north and south-west respectively, in accordance with their direction at the furthest points reached by Columbus on his second voyage. The eastern portion of the island thus assumes a shape slightly resembling that of Florida, which caused Harrisse in his book on the Cortereals to imagine a discovery of Florida, by unknown navigators, between 1500 and 1502. The 10 2 I 4 8 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. names on the imaginary continent are those properly belonging to Cuba, and thus the error becomes visible. (See Stevens and Coote.) Passing over numerous maps of Spanish and Portuguese origin, the former being usually the more accurate, we come to the celebrated series of Diego Ribero maps. The earliest of these is pre served at Weimar, and was made at Seville in 1527, by a person calling himself " Cosmographer to his Majesty." This map has been attributed to Fernando Colombo, to Sebastian Cabot, and Nuno Garcia de Toreno. But the claims of all these give way in face of the evident similarity between this map and another dated two years later, also preserved at Weimar, in which the author describes himself and his map in the same terms as before, this time adding his name, Diego Ribero, who was cosmographer to the Spanish sovereign from 1523 to 1533. A copy of this map is in the Museum of the Propaganda at Rome, and was exhibited at the Indian and Colonial Exhibition of 1886, where it was accompanied by an explanation containing several grave errors. The map was spoken of as " a contemporary copy of the first Borgian map, so celebrated in history on account of the line traced across it by Pope Alexander VI." This Pope issued a bull, dated May 4, 1493, by which the Spaniards were to have all lands found west of a line drawn 100 leagues westward of the Cape de APPENDIX TO CHAPTER IV. 149 Verde Islands ; but he did not trace any line on any map now known to exist. The " first Borgian map " probably means the map of Verrazano, pre served in the same museum, and of contemporary date; but neither of these maps is a copy of the other. The line fixed by the Pope s bull was disputed by the Portuguese, who would have been excluded from Brazil, and they demanded a line 400 leagues west of the Azores or Cape de Verde Islands, which appear to have been then regarded as in the same meridian. To settle the dispute, a conference was held at Tordesillas in 1494, the result of which was a treaty fixing the line of demarcation between the Spanish and Portuguese territories in the New World at a distance of 370 leagues west of the islands before named, or 270 leagues west of the line fixed by the Pope s bull. This new line may have been first laid down on a map made by Jaume Ferrer, now lost ; the earliest map known which shows this line is the Cantino "Carta da Navigar " of 1502, already mentioned. In the Diego Ribero maps, this line is shown as well as its continuation in the Eastern Hemisphere, and is made use of as the prime meridian, from which longitudes are reckoned east and west. The eastern line, 180" from the original one, passes through the East Indies about io c too far west, or what comes to the same thing, certain parts of the Indies are placed jo too far east on the map. 150 THE ENGLISH REDISCOVERY OF AMERICA. This is in itself a small error, but the question at issue was whether a lucrative trade should be con trolled by Spain or by Portugal, and every degree of longitude was contested by the two nations. The line is guarded at each side by the flags of Castile and Portugal, and it is noticeable that on the eastern side of the map they are placed more widely apart than on the western, as though to indicate a possible margin of error. This important political boundary is drawn on most maps as passing near the mouth of the Amazon, usually slightly to the west, and through the northern cape at the mouth of the La Plata. Even a rough calculation of its position is difficult, as no allow ance appears to have been made for the difference both in latitude and longitude between the Azores and the Cape de Verde Islands ; a line drawn 370 leagues west of the former would be in about 554o west longitude, and in the latter case about 45 west longitude. From the maps it would seem that from 50 to 52 west longitude may be taken as representing the general idea of the position of the line. One other map claims attention here, as being connected with the name of Sebastian Cabot. Of this there is but one copy known, which is pre served in the Bibliotheque Nationale at Paris, and dated 1544. Three other copies are believed to have existed, one of them being dated 1549. One APPENDIX TO CHAPTER IV. 151 copy was formerly at Whitehall, and one at Chenies. The peculiarity of these various copies is that they differ as to the date of the discovery, some giving 1494, which is considered to be a mistake for 1497, as given by the others. The question as to what part of America was first seen by Cabot has been discussed in a former chapter ; but we may add here that the map itself, in a side-note, gives evidence that the voyage of discovery was made by John Cabot, in company with his sons, and not, as some have insisted, under the sole command of Sebastian. This inscription ends with the words, " And also from the experience and practice of long sea service of the most excellent John Cabot, a Venetian by nation, and of my author, Sebastian, his son, the most learned of all men in knowledge of the stars and the art of navigation, who have discovered a certain part of the globe for a long time hidden from our people." THE END. Elliot Stock, Paternoster Row, London THIS DATE AN INITIAL PINE OP 25 CENTS LD 21-100m-7, 40 (6936s) YB M163213 THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY