A SURVEY OF THE CITY SCHOOLS OF GRAND JUNCTION COLORADO DISTRICT No. 1 MESA COUNTY r\j LO LO o MAY - 1916 GIFT OF x? yJciA /i <:/ />^ V7?>ri7 A Survey of the City Schools OF Grand Jimdtion, Colorado Di&rid No. 1, Mesa County Survey Committee FRANK L. CLAPP Director of the Survey Assistant Professor of Education, University of Colorado and Superintendent of Extension Work for Western Colorado WILLIAM A. COOK Assistant Professor of Education, University of Colorado and High School Visitor for the University SAMUEL QUIGLEY Dean of the Colorado State Normal School BEN GRIFFITH . . . Chairman of the Survey Committee HARRY B. JONES T. M. TODD riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiMiiiiiiiiiT The Daily -^^^> News Pqess FOREWORD This study, while officially addressed to the Board of School Directors, is presented to the patrons and friends of the schools of Grand Junction with the hope that it may result in better schools. While the Survey Committee has not been unmindful of the immediate occasion of its work as indicated in the Introduction which follows, yet it has ventured to keep in mind and to discuss in a brief way some of the more general problems of school organization and control as they confront the people of any community. A common understanding of some of the fundamental principles underlying public education on the part of everyone concerned should make easier and more pleasant the complex and difficult task of organizing and administering an efficient and economical system of schools adapted to the needs of the community. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE SURVEY COMMITTEE. 402921 LETTER OF TRANSMISSAL To the Board of Directors of School District No. 1, Mesa County, Colorado. Gentlemen : The Committee recently chosen by you to make a survey of the schools of District No. 1 beg leave to submit the following report. May we take this opportunity to express our appreciation of the uniform courtesy and cooperation accorded to us by every- one with whom we had occasion to work in the collection of data and the preparation of our conclusions. We trust that our efforts may result in the betterment of the schools of Grand Junction : Lay members BEN GRIFFITH, Chairman H. B. JONES T. M. TODD Professional members FRANK L. CLAPP, Director WILLIAM A. COOK SAMUEL QUIGLEY INTRODUCTION Early in February the Director of this Survey was invited by the Board of Directors of School District No. 1 to appear at its next regular meeting and to discuss the general purpose and character of school surveys. A similar invitation was received later from the Board of Directors of the Grand Junction Chamber of Commerce. The latter body attended the meeting of the School Board and the subject was canvassed somewhat thoroughly. On March 4 the School Board adopted the following resolution : "Whereas, a petition signed by jrnany representative citizens has been filed with this Board requesting that this Board have a survey of our school system made, and Whereas, there seems to be a general demand for such survey and as the Chamber of Commerce has agreed to defray the expenses of such survey in excess of One Hundred and Fifty Dollars, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that it be the sense of this School Board that a financial and educational survey of the school system of School District No. 1, Mesa County, Colorado, be made by a committee of six men consisting of the following: Dr. Frank L. Clapp and Dr. William A. Cook of the University of Colorado, Dean Samuel Quigley of the Colorado State Normal School at Gunnison, Ben Griffith, Harry B. Jones and T. M. Todd of Grand Junction, Colorado, and any member of the school board may be a member ex-officio of this Committee, and that this School District cooperate with the Chamber of Commerce by paying One Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($150.) toward defraying the expenses of such survey, provided this School Board be furnished a complete type- written report of the survey." The immediate occasion for the survey was a demand on the part of the people for a reduction in the public expenses and the desire on the part of the Board of Directors to meet this request without crippling the schools. While the professional members of the Committee have been responsible for the major portion of the study, the six members have worked as one body. Detailed plans for the work were discussed and agreed upon by the entire Committee before being put into operation. Each of the three professional members was primarily responsible for certain phases of the work but consultations were held daily and the work of each one was reviewed. The lay members were in constant touch with the professional members and their advice and suggestions were acted ui>oii whenever ijiv the judgment of the entire Committee such course seemed best. The report represents, with a few minor exceptions, the unanimous judgment of the six members of the Committee. The professional members put in on the ground a total of ten days each. The time spent by the lay members cannot be accurately estimated but, as stated above, they were in constant touch with the work at all times and some one or more of them visited each of the buildings and many of the classes. On the afternoon of the first day of the work a meeting was held with the Superintendent, the School Board and the teachers at which the general purpose and plans of the Committee were explained. Later another meeting was held with the Board at which many problems of the schools were discussed informally. The following letter was issued to the public when the Committee began its work: "To facilitate the work which the Committee hopes to do an opportunity will be given to any person to bring to the attention of the Committee such matters of general criticism or constructive suggestion as should receive consideration. In order that time may not be wasted by either those desiring a hearing or by the Committee, it is requested that any one who wishes to appear state in writing the general character of the matter to be presented. Upon receipt of such communications the Committee will arrange a time and place for each hearing. All communications will be confidential, and all hearings private. Communi- cations should be addressed to "FRANK L. CLAPP, Director of the Survey." No one appeared before the Committee in response to this invitation. in the beginning of the work twenty Colorado towns were selected for purposes of comparison and blanks were sent to the superintendents asking for information. Not all of these were able to reply so that some of the comparative tables are not full, and no one of them contains more than eighteen schools. The members of the Committee received no compensation except their actual expenses. The total expense of the study in- cluding the printing of 500 copies of the report was $167.54. Of this amount $150.00 was paid by the Board of School Directors and $17.54 by the Chamber of Commerce. (9) CHAPTER I. ORGANIZATION AND CONTROL Location School District No. 1 embraces the civic corporation of Grand Junction, with a population of about 8,000, and outlying territory to the extent of about 144 square miles, the total area of the district being 147 square miles. Grand Junction is the point at which two branches of the Denver and Rio Grande railroad meet. It is the largest town in Western Colorado, and is an important trading and shipping center. The dominant industry in the immediate vicinity is fruit raising, this being the name of the famous Grand Valley fruit. Census, Enrollment, and Buildings The school census for February, 1916, was 2,007. The total enrollment for the school year 1915-16 up to May 1, was 1926. TABLE NO. 1. Showing Number and Location of Buildings, Grades Accommodated and Number of Teachers in Each. Building Number * Location Grades of Teachers Bryant ..S.W 1,2 2 Riverside S.W 3,4,5 1 Emerson S.E 1,2,3,4,5,6 10 Hawthorne N.W .1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 8 Lowell Gen. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Kindergarten 16 Franklin Cen 7,8,9 8 High _!_ N.E , 10,11,12 , 8 Whittier Gen Commercial, Domestic Science, Special Supervisors 5 Total 58 *Part of city Divisions of the School The School system consists of the Kindergarten department, the Elementary schools and the High school. The Elementary schools do eight years of work, and the High School is of the conventional four-year type. Children are admitted to the Kindergarten at the age of five, and to the first grade at the age of six, their ages being reckoned as of December 1 following admission. Instruction and promotion is by grade in the Elemen- tary school but by subject in the High School. Pupils coming from other schools and applying for admis- sion to the grades of the Grand Junction schools, are given an oral examination by the Superintendent, and assigned to par- ticular grades on the basis of this examination. Corresponding examinations are not usually given to those coming from other high schools with proper credentials. (10) Retardation and Acceleration (Age Standard) Retardation and acceleration measured according to the age standard have to do with the age of the pupil in relation to his grade. Since a pupil enters the first grade ordinarily at the age of six, he is known as an accelerated pupil, or as a pupil who is young for his grade, if he is in the first grade and under six years of age. Since many children do not enter the first grade until they are seven, and consequently do not finish the grade until they are eight, they are not classed as retarded pupils until they are past eight years of age and still in the first grade. Pupils between the ages of six and eight are known as normal pupils. Corresponding age limits have been established for each of the other grades. The following table will make clear the basis on which pupils in the Elementary schools are classified as accelerated, normal, or retarded pupils according to the age standard. TABLE NO. 2. The basis for classifying Pupils as Accelerated, Normal, and Retarded. (Age Standard) Grade Accelerated Normal Retarded (Under) (Between) (Over) Age Ages Age 1 6 6-8 8 2 7 7-9 9 3 8 8-10 10 4 9 9-11 11 5 10 10-12 12 6 11 11-13 . 13 7 12 12-14 14 8... ..13 13-15 15 TABLE NO. 3. Snowing the number and ages of the Accelerated, Normal and Retarded pupils in each grade. (Age Standard) Grades 12345678 Ages 5-6 3 6- 7 141 14 7- 8 36 98 14 8- 9 15 38 67 10 9-10 2 20 48 78 7 10-11 1 8 42 36 48 8 }g 1 I tt H 50* 2? 9/ 76 Accelerated, 6 per cent S 2 1 *6 4 i 3 ? 2 2 9 9 33} Normal, 68 per cent. 15-16 1 4 5 22 23 1 {}* \ \ *t> 34 Retarded, 26 per cent 18-19 2) Total 198 182 184 175 155 156 119 121 1290 (11) In the above table the pupils indicated in black-faced type are normal pupils, those indicated by the numbers above the black-faced figures are accelerated pupils, and those below are retarded pupils. There are two conditions indicated in the above table with which we should be concerned, viz., the wide spread of ages among the pupils in each grade and the large number of retarded pupils. It will be noticed that in each grade there is a spread of age of five or six years, the first grade for instance containing three pupils under six years of age and one over ten. The dis- advantage of this condition is to be found in the fact that the teacher of each grade has under her instruction pupils whose interests are greatly different. She is handicapped by the fact that she must use different methods with the younger and the older pupils. The retarded pupils, as explained above, are those who are old for their grade. .These pupils tend to drop out of school before they finish the common school course. In addition to this they do not get ready for the active work of life so early as children may. These facts demand that a school system be so conducted as to prevent the presence of over-aged pupils so far as possible. It is very evident that these conditions are not alto- gether the fault of the school itself. A school cannot put pupils through the grades on schedule unless they enter school at the p roper tim^e and attend regularly. A large percentage of retard- at'on should receive the very serious attention of both the school people and the parents in a community. The following table shows how Grand Junction schools compare with certain other Colorado schools in the matter of retardation : TABLE NO. 4. Showing the percentage of retarded pupils in thirteen schools in Colorado Percentage of Towns Retardation Cripple Creek 13 Boulder 14 Glenwood Springs 17 WaJsenburg 18 Colorado City 19 Leadvilie - 19 Delta 21 Salida 21 Montrose 23 Errand Junction 26 Rocky Ford 26 Fort Collins 28 Longmont 32 The above percentages are based upon the number of pupils who belonged to school during the week beginning April 17, 1916, and their ages are taken as of their last birthday preceding the opening of school in September, 1915. These percentages must not be compared with percentages of retardation found in other survey reports since such percentages are as a rule computed on (12) the basis of the number of pupils who belong to school at the end of the year and their ages are taken as of June 1. This latter method will increase materially the percentage of retardation, hence we wish to repeat that the above percentages are com- parable only with each other. Grade Repetition In any school system there are certain pupils who for various reasons do not succeed in making one grade per year during their actual school life. They may be called "repeaters." Any school should avoid the presence of repeaters in so far as it is at all possible. Not only does the repetition of a grade discourage arid retard a child, but the total money co?t to the district of the children who repeat is considerable. Among the 1290 pupils who belonged to the schools of Grand Junction during the week beginning April 17, 832 or 65 per cent had at some time repeated one or more grades. These 832 pupils may be divided into two classes as follows, 126 who had repeated in other schools, and 606 who had repeated in the schools of Grand Junction. It will be noted that practically 50 per cent of the 1290 pupils had repeated one or more grades in Grand Junc- tion. These 606 pupils in turn may be divided into two classes as follows, those who failed in their work, and those who were put back when they came from some other school. Those who failed numbered 428, or 71 per cent of the total number repeating in Grand Junction, while those who were put back when they came numbered 178, or 29 per cent. To be sure some of these pupils came from schools where the distinction between grades is not marked and perhaps it is not exactly correct to say that they were put back. The number and percentage of "repeaters" in the schools seem excessive. A school having a large percentage of repeaters may defend itself on the ground that its course of study is more extensive than that of other schools or that the quality of work done is superior. A careful comparison of the course of study in the schools of Grand Junction does not indicate that the work required is more extensive than that in other schools. So far as the standard tests described in Chapter III. reveal the quality of work done in the schools, it cannot be said that this is superior. The Batavian System In order to prevent pupils from failing and being compelled to repeat their grade the Lowell and Emerson schools are each provided with a Batavian teacher to whom pupils are sent for special assistance. Since these two schools are provided with such teachers and the Hawthorne school is not a comparison of the repetitions in these buildings on a percentage basis ought to reveal the efficiency of the Batavian system. Reference to Table No. 1, p. 9, will indicate that these three schools are the only ones which would be comparable since they are the only ones that (13) maintain a majority of the eight grades. The social and economic differences among these three communities which cause differ- ences in regularity of attendance, etc., may account in part for the different showing. TABLE NO. 5. Showing Percentages of Failures in Batavian and Non- Batavian Schools for Years 1914 and 1915. Batavian Non-Batavian Emerson Lowell Hawthorne 1914-15.... 7 6 10 1915-16* 8 9.5 7 Average.... 7.5 7.8 8.5 'Failures for this year approximated by the teachers. An analysis of the above percentages would reveal that the present Batavian system is not markedly efficient. The largest percentage of failures is to be found in the Hawthorne school at the end of the year 1914-15, but the Lowell school is only .5 of one per cent, behind in 1915-16. The averages reveal only one per- centage of difference between the lowest and highest. The efficiency of the system would be more fairly indicated by figures covering several years but records giving this information are not kept. Recommendations The entrance examinations now given by the Superintendent to pupils applying for admission to the grades should be discon- tinued. The demotion of pupils as pointed out on page 6 is responsible for 29 per cent, of the repeaters found in the schools. The Superintendent informs the Committee that when a pupil is assigned to a grade on the basis of this examination that he is later promoted if the quality of his work indicates that he can do the work of the next grade. This is not likely to be the case, how- ever because of the fact that new text books are placed in the hands of new pupils and they find plenty of totally new material with which to busy themselves. Consequently their acquaintance with the fundamentals is not at once evident. Added to this is the fact that many teachers are not inclined to recommend the promo- tion of particularly good pupils since such promotion deprives their rooms of the presence and stimulus of these children. As a substitute for the present Batavian system it is the judgment of the Committee that there should be established at the Lowell school an ungraded room, to which would be assigned such pupils as, in the judgment of the Superintendent and the different principals and teachers, cannot do the work of the grade to which they belong with the rest of the class, and also those pupils who for a time at least can make more rapid progress than their fellows. To this room also may be assigned those pupils who enter from other schools and whose knowledge of funda- mentals does not enable them to "fit" into any one grade. These pupils should remain in this room until they are ready to take up (14) the work in a regular manner with some grade. This room should be under the tuition of one of the strongest teachers it is possible to obtain. Pupils should not be assigned to the ungraded room until the regular classroom teacher has made special efforts to keep them with the remainder of the class. When any pupil is assigned to this room, whether because of slow or rapid progress, his case should be talked over with his parents, the purpose of his being placed there made clear, and the cooperation of the parents secured if possible. In order to prevent repetition in the upper grades and to encourage pupils to remain in school the Committee recommends the organization of an Intermediate school. This school should embrace the work of what is now the Seventh, Eighth and Ninth grades and should be housed in the Franklin building. Reference to Table No. 1, page 1, will reveal the fact that prac- tically all of the Seventh-, Eighth-, and Ninth-grade pupils are already housed in the Franklin building. The new plan would mean the transfer of a very few pupils from the Hawthorne and Lowell buildings. This would not be serious since the former building is only six blocks from the home of the proposed Inter- mediate school while the Lowell building is on the same block. The program of studies in this school should be in part optional so that a pupil could take four, five or six subjects, ac- cording to his ability, strength and outside duties permit. To a certain extent he should also be allowed to select his work in line with his particular interests. The selection of studies should be under the supervision of the Principal of the school, and in con- sultation with the parents and those teachers who are intimately acquainted with the child. The instruction should be depart- mental and promotions should be by subjects. The pupils in this school should be seated permanently in certain rooms presided over by one of the denartmental teachers who should be responsible for the general welfare of the pupils in her room in much the same way as is the teacher of the seventh or eighth grade under the present system. The Principal of the school should teach no more than three periods a day, in the afternoons, the remainder of the time being devoted to super- vision. Grading and Examinations In both the Elementary and High Schools examinations are held at the end of each month. Scholastic marks are given in letters with a corresponding significance in percentages. Three days are set aside for the examination in the High School. Pupils who make class records above a certain standard are exempt from examination. An average of 75 per cent, in all sub- jects with nothing below 60 per cent, entitles a pupil to promotion. Recommendations Examinations in High School should not be given oftener than every six weeks. This is the prevailing practice. The (15) present system means that twenty-seven days per year or prac- tically one and one-half months are devoted to examinations. This does not include the time devoted to finals. The rule permitting the pupil who makes an average of 75 per cent, to pass in a subject in which his mark is as low as 60 per cent, should be changed so that it applies only to required subjects. Very careful attention should be given by the Superintendent and teachers to the distribution of marks among the different values. Some teachers give high marks while others grade much more closely. A study of the marks assigned by the High school teachers at the end of March reveals the fact that 98 per cent, of one teacher's marks were among the upper four values (A-f, A, B-|-, B) and only 2 per cent, among the lower four (C+, C, D+, D), while another teacher distributed only 57 per cent, of her marks among the upper four values and 43 per cent, among the lower four. Similar conditions were found in the grades. This is not fair to either the pupils or the teachers. Sanitation Recent progressive school legislation says that the ratio between the window space and the floor space of the school room should be 1 to 6. Only fourteen out of fifty-three rooms reach this standard. In many cases the transoms above the windows have been painted over with dark paint and in one room the upper half of each window had been darkened with the same material. All shades are opaque. In spite of the fact that the lighting space is as a rule inadequate, when all of the rooms were visited during one afternoon, eight were found with the shades drawn so as to exclude one-fourth of the light; eight others had one-half of the light excluded; and five rooms had three-fourths of the window space covered with opaque shades. In no one of these rooms was there any possible reason why shades should be drawn. All but eight out of fifty-three rooms violate the standard that the height of the windows shall not be less than one-half the width of the room. A rough and ready judgment of the adaptability of the seats and desks to the pupils who were seated in them indicated that one-tenth of the pupils were improperly seated. Comparatively few adjustable desks and seats were found. Recommendations In the erection of buildings in the future most careful atten- tion should be given to their lighting and the very low standard indicated above should not be violated. The present opaque shades should be replaced at once with shades that are translucent. No lighting area should oe made permanently opaque under any circumstances. None but adjustable seats and desks should be purchased in the future. (16) The third grade room at the Emerson building should be remodeled so as to admit more light from the sides and the present skylight should be removed. The toilets at the Emerson building should be equipped with a new flushing system at once. This antiquated toilet system as well as that of the Lowell building should be replaced by modern systems as soon as possible. The Bryant and Riverside buildings should be replaced by a new and modern building as soon as economic conditions permit. Lay Control According to the school law of the state the District is of the First Class having a school population of more than one thousand, the actual school census in February, 1916 being 2007. Lay control of the schools is vested in a Board of Directors of five members. Two of these are elected each biennium for a term of six years with the exception that only one director is elected at each third election. Unexpected vacancies are filled by the remaining directors. Very rarely does a member serve more than one term. It is to the advantage of any institution controlled by a Board of Directors to be assured that at no time shall the majority of the members of such Board be made up of new and inexperienced men. Yet this often happens under the law governing first class school districts in Colorado when a vacancy occurs by death or resignation during a year in which two members are to be seated. The law should be so changed as to provide for a five year term and to permit only one new member to take his seat each year, the other member who was elected at the same time using the time until his installation in becoming acquainted with his duties. The following table will make this plan clear, member "A" being replaced by member "a" and so on : Year Elected Seated Learning duties 1915 A&B A B 1916 no election B 1917 G&D G D 1918 no election D 1919 E&a E a 1920 no election a 1921 b&c b c This plan avoids the expense of annual elections and provides for no more than one new member of the board each year, except in the case of unexpected vacancies. The law further provides that the officers of the Board shall be a President, Secretary, and Treasurer. The Secretary and Treasurer may or may not be members of the Jtfoard. In District No. 1 the Secretary is a paid employee who is not a mem- ber of the Board, and the Treasurer is also an outside man, but receives no salary. (17) Professional Control The professional control of the schools of Grand Junction is entrusted to a Superintendent, and to various principals and teachers. The Superintendent is the head of the system and is chosen by the Board of Directors for such term as they may see fit. The present Superintendent was chosen in the spring of 1915 for a term of three years. At this time he had still one year of a three-year term to serve but at his request the old contract was abrogated and a new one made. A three-year term for the Superintendent is quite common and desirable. Generally speaking it is not good practice for the Board to reelect a Superintendent before the expiration of his term. This permits a school man to ask for reelection at aus- picious times and thus to perpetuate his administration. Relation of Lay and Professional Control Educational thinkers agree that the function of school control may be divided into four rather distinct phrases, viz., legis- lative, administrative, inspectorial, and supervisory*. A definition of these functions and a discussion of their division between the Board and Superintendent should contribute to efficient and pleasant working relationships between the two. The legislative function has to do with questions oi general purpose, policy, and finance. It does not concern itself with details. It requires broad, general knowledge ol social and economic conditions. It does not require special, technical knowledge of ways and means. It determines, for instance, whether the school shall have for its purpose vocational training, technical instruction, or preparation for college. It does not determine whether a course in German or in Spanish shall be a part of the college preparatory work. It decides whether $50,000 or $75,000 shall be expended for school purposes. It does not decide whether examination paper of quality A or quality B shall be purchased. It rules whether or not pupils in general shall be required to take physical training. It does not concern itself with individual pupils who may claim exemption from the rule on particular grounds. The legislative function belongs to the School Board. The administrative function has to do with ways and means of carrying out the general purposes and policies of the Board. It decides what shall constitute vocational training or college pre- paration; what methods of instruction shall be employed; what quality of paper is best suited to the needs of the school, etc. It has to do with the internal life of the school ; with details of organiz- ation; with examinations; with records, reports, etc. It requires special, technical knowledge. The administrative function belongs to the Superintendent and his professional assistants, the prin- cipals and teachers^. The inspectorial function has to do with determining whether or not the purposes and policies of the school are being carried 'Elliott, E. C., City School Supervision, PP. 7-13. (18) out, and with questions of efficient and economical organization and control. It evaluates the results of the work of the school; it measures sanitary conditions and studies systems of financial management. It is in part a function of the Superintendent but in LARGER part a function of the Board. However since it requires technical knowledge the Board itself cannot perform this function except in a limited way, but must employ specially trained disinterested assistance for its share of this work. The present survey is an example of inspectorial work performed by outside parties as agents of the Board. This kind of work should be done frequently and in a broadly constructive manner. The supervisory function has to do with questions of service rendered by assistants, principally classroom teachers. It requires very special technical knowledge. It is not critical but helpful. It coordinates and harmonizes the work of tfie different departments and teachers. It determines the tone and spirit and standards of the school. It sees that proper working facilities and supplies are provided. It belongs to the Superintendent in a general way but in a system such as that of Grand Junction there should be more immediate supervision by principals. Super- v'sion is one of the most vitally essential phases of schooi control. It must be remembered in reading the above somewhat cate- gorical and formal discussion of the general relations obtaining between a Board and its Superintendent, that one cannot speak in universally inclusive terms. The division of functions as indicated above does not mean that the Board in the exercise of its functions, or the Superintendent in the exercise of his duties should proceed with no reference to the other controlling agency. It does mean that in general the judgment of one agency or the other should be the primary determining factor, according as the matter in question is one of legislation, or administration, inspection or supervision. For instance, in the selection of teachers, which is an administrative function, the responsibility is upon the Superintendent and his should be the determining voice but he should not select a teacher of whose fitness he cannot convince his Board. The Board on the other hand should realize that the special, technical knowledge of the Superintendent should make him the better judge. Applications of the Above Principles to the Schools of Grand Junction As is often the case there is some evidence that the above principles are not carefully observed in Grand Junction. The Board should not permit the time of its meetings to be devoted to individual cases of discipline, except in very rare instances. This responsibility should be upon the Superintendent, and he should not bring these matters to the Board except for advice. The making of courses of study should be in the hands of the Superintendent and his professional assistants. Teachers should be elected by the Board only after nomin- ation by the Superintendent. (19) At present the professional people connected with the school have very little to do with the purchase or distribution of supplies except to write out requisitions for what is needed. (This is not true of text-books) . Supplies are purchased by the purchas- ing committee of the Board, and distributed by its Secretary. This man is without any technical training or experience in school matters, yet the Superintendent and teachers must depend on his judgment when they ask for an allotment of supplies such as paper, etc. Numerous instances came to the attention of the Survey Committee where the Secretary had refused the full amount of supplies asked for by teachers at least until after repeated requests. This results in a serious handicap of the school work. The general supervision of the selection and distri- bution of these supplies should be in the hands of the Superin- tendent. However, the purchasing of supplies should be left in the hands of the Board as at present. In general the teachers should not bring matters to the Board except through the Superintendent, since he is charged with the responsibility for the schools as a whole. This rule should not be emphasized, so that teachers feel that they will incur the censure of the Board or Superintendent if they speak to the Board concerning matters of vital concern to them. The privilege, however, should not be abused by the teachers or used without due appreciation of its significance. Supervision of the Schools The Committee was impressed with the fast that the schools receive very little supervision. The supervisory function is per- formed altogether by the Superintendent. He states that at least one-half of his time is taken up with office work this year but not so much in former years. This leaves approximately fifty hours per month to supervise the work of fifty-eight teachers in an immediate manner, and to consult with them regarding the general purposes and methods of their work. Teachers report comparatively few and brief visits from the superintendent. Another evidence of an absence of supervision consists in the fact that teachers of the same grade were using somewhat different methods which left their pupils at the end of the year in quite different conditions for the work of the next grade. For instance, one first-grade teacher uses the phonic method of teach- ing reading for most part while another uses the word method. At the beginning of the present year a second-grade teacher received pupils from both of these rooms. The result was that the second-grade teacher found herself handicapped by the two differently prepared groups of pupils. Supervision should not impose upon a teacher a detailed method, but it should so co-ordin- ate methods in a single grade that the product will be or a some- what uniform character. Again the Committee found that there was a lack of common understanding as to the purposes of certain courses on the part of the Superintendent and those who were doing the instructing. For instance, the Superintendent stated (20) that the purpose of a certain department in the High School was to prepare the pupils to do practical work. One of the teachers in this department thought the work was. intended to give the pupils simply a general training, while another was not at all clear as to what the purpose was. Each of these three stated that if practical efficiency was the chief purpose the character and content of the course would be quite different from what they would if general training were the end in view. No consultations had been held to talk over this matter. Similar conditions were found to obtain in other departments. It is only fair to say that the same lack of understanding of purposes would in all probability be found in most schools. The committee does not wish to criticise the Superintendent or the teachers in any department, but it does want to emphasize the necessity for attention to this very important phase of supervision. As stated above, the full responsibility for the supervision of the schools is at present on the Superintendent. UDviously, it is impossible for him to do this work as it should be done. The Board employs a "principal" at each grade building who is paid from $95 to $145 a year for acting in such capacity, that is she is paid this sum above the maximum salary allowed grade teachers. These principals teach full time. Their duties as principals are chiefly disciplinary. The principal of the High School and the principal of the ninth-grade at the Franklin building bear practically the same relation to their schools as do the principals in the grade build- ings to the schools maintained therein, that is, they teach full time and act as disciplinary officials. Yet, the principal of the High School receives $1150 and the principal of the ninth grade $670 above the maximum salary allowed high-school teachers. The Board is not getting from these two men the services for which it is paying, nor the services which they are capable of Rendering. Both are men of training and of supervisory exper- ience. Recommendations The principal of the High School should be relieved of at least three-fifths of his teaching duties and be given the direct super- vision of the school. He should have a voice in the selection of the teachers; he should be primarily responsible for the courses of study and for the schedule of recitations; he should supervise the instruction of the teachers; he should conduct the general exercises of the school ; he should be the central influence in the social life of the school ; he should supervise all athletic activities and relationships; he should have time to study in a general and local way the problems of secondary education, and should take up the professional study of educational problems with his teachers in meetings which he himself conducts. The principal of the ninth grade should be made the principal of the Intermediate School, (p. 14) and should sustain the same general relations to it that the principal of the High School does (21) to his school under the plan indicated above. These principals should be responsible to the Superintendent who should exercise only a general supervisory control over the two schools. This would leave the Superintendent free to supervise the work of the first six grades, where the larger numbers of child- ren and teachers are found and where the work needs closer coordination and assistance and more expert supervision. He should cut down his present office work and be in close touch with the work of these grades while retaining his more general control over the Intermediate and High schools. (22) CHAPTER II. INSTRUCTION Testing Results, General One purpose of instruction in the elementary grades is to give the children mastery of the fundamentals spelling, reading, writing, and arithmetic. Fortunately such men as Ayres, Thorn- dike, Starch, and Courtis, and many others, have devised fairly well perfected objective tests for measuring the achievements of pupils in the common branches. These tests, moreover, have been standardized by application to thousands of pupils, the country over, so that it is now possible to tell approximately how much may be expected of the normal pupils of a given grade. The standing of each pupil, each class and the entire school system can be found and compared with similar items in other school systems. In Grand Junction the Committee gave the Ayres spelling tests, the Starch silent reading tests, the Courtis arithmetic tests, and it scored the penmanship of the entire school system using the Ayres scale. The next few pages contain an explanation of the tests as they were given and a tabulation of the results. Spelling, Explanation Under the direction of Dr. Leonard P. Ayres of the Russell Sage Foundation a very long list of common words was given to each grade of over seventy school systems, with the purpose of finding out what words in the list were spelled correctly by 100 per cent of each grade, 95 per cent, 90 per cent and so on down the scale. In this way it was possible to derive lists that approxi- mately all in a given grade could spell perfectly, or another list upon which they could make only 90 per cent or 85 per cent, etc. The words chosen for the Grand Junction tests were those which approximately 73 per cent of each grade might be expected to spell correctly. In other words, if the grade average is about 73 per cent, the grade is up to standard. The words of each grade list are given below. The same member of the committee crave the test in all rooms; conditions were identical and favorable. (23) Sr^''as^ CJ* O CD t" CD CD D* P 3 O* ^ O P *^ P ~ I >/K" Itpl^IIIP Plflp *"3 P? M 5^* b* ^t ^* ^ Grade SPELLING SCORES BY GRADES. 23456 64 47 73 67 70 59 73 44 67 45 62 66 60 72 62 63 66 68 75 71 74 55 85 61 65 73 63 70 72 66 57 49 69 70 \verage . ...58.7 62.5 64 65.6 68.5 63 73 5 , 1 (25) Out of the seven grades taking the spelling test one reached the standard. The average, however, does not reveal anything. The excessive lack of uniformity among the pupils of every grade should be noted. In the second grade four pupils made 100 per cent; forty other pupils exceeded the standard; and all the rest fell below. In the third grade two pupils wrote a perfect test; fifty-six others exceeded the standard ; but thirty-nine received 50 or below, and a large number of others made less than 70. Eight fifth graders spelled every word correctly, but fifty fell short of 50 per cent, and the rest of the class were unable to make up the deficiency. The sixth grade had only two perfect pupils ; twenty- two that spelled only half the words or fewer; and thirty-seven others that did not attain above 70 per cent. Four seventh grade pupils made a perfect score, but sixty-seven spelled but half the words or less. Although the eighth grade had only three perfect papers, it attained the standard score with but fifty-three grades below the standard. Penmanship, Explanation Beginning with the third grade all the pupils in the elemen- tary schools were requested to write for five minutes, repeating the first four lines of "Mary had a little lamb." This familiar rhyme was chosen so that it would not be necessary for the pupils to puzzle over what they were writing. The specimens were taken without any coaching whatsoever. The Scale The Ay res scale was employed in scoring the papers. This scale consists of a chart containing twenty-four specimens of pen- manship to which eight scores, from 20 to 90 per cent, have been assigned. There are three types of penmanship of each grade; for example, an almost vertical hand marked 30, a more slanting type marked 30, and a still more slanting type marked 30. The other seven ranks are composed of three types each in the same way. These specimens have been chosen and ranked by the co-oper- ation of many individuals scoring each specimen independently. Over 18,000 specimens were measured in developing the original scale, and they were taken from 40 different cities; so that the scale represents a consensus of opinion. It has been reprinted fifteen times and employed to measure the penmanship of many thousands of pupils. Thus it has become standardized and a fair basis of comparison. The Use of the Scale The method of using the scale is extremely simple. The examiner takes a specimen of the writing submitted by the pupil and slides it along the chart until he finds a specimen of corres- ponding kind on the chart. He then records the grade of the chart specimen as that of the pupil. (26) Scoring the Papers The Grand Junction specimens were scored with great care. From five to ten individuals scored each specimen and recorded the grade without knowing what grade any other one of the scorers would give the same specimen. Later all grades were collected, and if in any case a disagreement of more than ten was discovered, the paper so marked was taken out and scored again by a new committee. For the most part there was close agreement in the estimates of the original scoring committees, but all disputed specimens received a new accounting. The Standard Due to causes which it is not possible to discuss here, there is a wide variation in the writing of pupils of the same grade. Some eighth grade pupils write no better than third graders. Occasion- ally a pupil in one of the lower grades will write as well as the best in grade eight. But in general there is a consistent pro- gression in the improvement from grade to grade. It is expected that pupils of the upper grades should attain an average of about 50 per cent by the Ayres scale. Results of Test Since Grand Junction has had a special supervisor of pen- manship and has emphasized the subject in the lower grades, the test was applied to grades 3 to 8 inclusive. The following are the averages: STANDING OF EACH GRADE IN PENMANSHIP Grade 3 29 Grade ...A 35 Grade .5 43 Grade ^ 6 56 Grade 7 55 Grade 8 59 Average of entire school 44.5 Average of four upper grades .53.2 Reading, Explanation The Starch test for silent reading was employed in the six upper grades. This test consists of descriptive or narrative prose selections of graduated difficulty, a different selection for each grade. The selections have been chosen carefully and standard- ized by application to thousands of pupils. The first lines follow : Grade III. Little Abe hurried home as fast as his feet could carry him. Perhaps if he had worn stockings and shoes like yours he could have run faster. But, instead, he wore deerskin leggings and clumsy moccasins of bear skin that his mother had made for him. Grade IV. The red squirrel usually waked me in the dawn, running over the roof and up and down the sides of the house, as if sent out of the woods for this very purpose. (27) Grade IV. One upon a time, there lived a very rich man, and a king besides, whose name was Midas ; and he had a little daugh- ter, whom nobody but myself ever heard of, and whose name I either never knew, or have entirely forgotten. Grade VI. In a secluded and mountainous part of Stiria there was in old times a valley of the most surprising and luxur- iant fertility. It was surrounded on all sides by steep and rocky mountains, rising into peaks which were always covered with snow, and from which a number of torrents descended in constant cataracts. Grade VII. Captain John Hull was the mint-master of Mas- sachusetts, and coined all the money that was made there. This was a new line of business, for in the earlier days of the colony the current coinage consisted of gold and silver money of England, Portugal, and Spain. Grade VIII. The years wnt on, and Ernest ceased to be a boy. He had grown to be a young man now. He attracted little notice from the other inhabitants of the valley; for they saw nothing remarkable in his way of life, save that, when the labor of the day was over he still loved to go apart and gaze and medi- tate upon the Great Stone Face. Method The selections, printed on one side of unfolded sheets, are placed face downward on the desks, and each pupil writes his name on his paper. At the signal the papers are turned printed side up, and exactly thirty seconds are allowed in which to read. Care is taken beforehand to make clear to the children that con- centration is necessary because the time is so short. Exactly at the expiration of the time the pupils are told to stop reading and to write on the blank sheet as much of the story as possible. Scoring The papers are scored for speed and comprehension. Speed means the number of words read in one second, and compre- hension the number of significant words used in the reproduc- tion. In estimating this, only the words are counted that give the thought of the selection without deviation and repetition. The pupils are allowed ample time for the reproduction. Results The results of the reading test are disappointing from the standpoint of the comparative rank of Grand Junction pupils in comprehension. The standings of the several grades show neither a consistent progression of attainment from grade to grade, nor are the scores attained as high as they should be. It was obvious in giving this test, as all others, that child- ren of the same grade, but different rooms, show a marked vari- ation in the power to concentrate and respond effectively to any requirement. The table following suggests this lack of uniformity (28) in efficiency. Speed is marked "s" and comprehension "c" in the table. The variations in the third grades are especially notable, though there is one amazing case of a fourth grade that is out- classed by all others in the system: Silent Reading Scores by Separate Grades. 34 5678 sc sc sc so sc sc 1.5 28 2.1 9.3 2.3 36 2.0 29 2.4 33 3.1 35 1.6 12 2.2 27 2.5 31 2.5 26 3.2 46 3.2 47 1.8 20 2.2 24 2.8 25 2.8 25 3.5 43 3.7 37 2.1 11 2.3 26 3.3 32 4.0 33 3.8 44 2.1 23 2.8 24 3.6 32 4.3 19 2.5 10 2.8 24 3.9 34 4.6 21 G/ W/C3 ?r6 C/e6 Grand Junction. .. Standard F/qure .showincj I1ie relation between silent ft acting ftpc/e ty Grand Junction and other b laces (30) Arithmetic, Explanation The Courtis Standard Arithmetic Tests, Series B, were given to the five upper grades. These tests consist of exercises in addi- tion, subtraction, multiplication and division. They do not involve fractions. Specimen problems from the test papers are given below : 339 >76 m $61 757 136 322 799 584 125 647 699 624 512 146 109 ADDITION 952 397 525 974 458 702 397 937 274 357 925 819 489 877 482 645 761 598 352 431 367 102142649 70428369 9237 27 SUBTRACTION. 91889637 87168558 78379474 28712470 MULTIPLICATION. 4568 6845 3297 85 63 49 78052979 53180508 7239 DIVISION. 74)66822 38)10640 95)88445 The same problems are given to all grades, the attainment depending upon the speed and accuracy with which the work is done, not upon a greater relative difficulty in the problems sub- mitted to the different grades. Methods The problems are printed in folders, each operation on a separate page. These folders are distributed but not opened until the signal is given. Eight minutes each are allowed for addition and division, six for multiplication and four for sub- traction. All necessary directions, including the advice that the pupils should work straight ahead as well as they can, are given before the signal so that there can be no misunderstanding and no interruption. As soon as the time is up for one operation, the children are to rest at attention until the signal is given to pro- ceed with the next. It is felt that the conditions were all favor- able to the best work of the pupils. The Scoring The papers of this test were all scored under the direction of the Committee and all computations were checked for accu- racy. In considering the standards that should be used for (31) comparison the Committee decided upon the actual median of June scores made in various places throughout the country in 1915 the general standard. The Results The tabulation which follows shows the number of ex- amples attempted, the number right, and the percentage of accuracy for each grade. The general standard is given with all these for comparison. The graphs show the same results in a different manner. A mere glance at the tabulation and graph show that Grand Junction falls below the general standard. This raises questions as to whether insufficient time is given to drilling in the funda- mentals, as to the character of the course of study, the quality of the teaching, and the special problems or conditions peculiar to Grand Junction that may account for the shortcomings of the pupils in arithmetic. Some of these questions are considered in other connections in this report: Attempts 4.3 5.2 5.6 6.2 7.4 5.9 6.3 8.4 9.2 10.2 ADDITION Rights 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.6 5.4 6.3 7.1 Percentage of Accuracy O 99 P I I 40 40 51 55 56 54 57 64 68 70 Attempts SUBTRACTION Rights CD Percentage of Accuracy 5.7 6.5 7.8 9.1 10.6 6.2 7.8 9.2 10.7 <2.3 3.4 3.2 4.9 7.3 8.4 3.5 5.6 7.3 8.9 10.3 62 51 63 82 79 58 72 80 84 84 Attempts (32) MULTIPLICATION Rights 4.3 5.2 5.1 8.2 9.5 5.0 6.2 7.9 9.0 10.7 2.2 2.7 3.3 5.2 6.9 3.5 4.0 5.8 7.6 8.5 Percentage of Accuracy 52 52 65 63 72 57 66 74 76 80 DIVISION Attempts ! I Rights i cs H- o* o' a 3.2 3.6 1.3 1.5 41 > 3.2 5.4 2.1 3.7 64 3.4 7.1 2.1 5.7 61 7.2 8.1 5.9 6.7 82 8.6 10.6 7.5 9.3 88 Percentage of Accuracy o 92 I I 42 69 80 83 'dlfl 3/7. "Off a hfr 7C/J on. Grade? 4 5 6 7 T Results of Arithmetic Tesfs fled ion -number of comet answers^fy grades, torn kofed with standard scores Crand^ Junction. Standard l/ca toff. Grade? 4 67* Grand Junction. Standard (35) The Curriculm, Explanation It is the plan of this portion of the report to discuss the curriculum in the face of the evidence afforded by the objective tests just described. But in Grand Junction, as everywhere, there are peculiar problems that demand a pause before any sweeping conclusions are drawn. For example, how much are late entrance and the inevitable complications that result there- iTom to blame for Grand Junction's failure to score to standard? Whatever is said about the curriculum or the quality of teaching must certainly take account of the transient and irregular school population. Of 482 new students entering the Grand Junction schools up to April 10 during the present school year, 441 were below the high school. Of the 441 grade children, 285 enrolled late as indicated by the following : Kinder- Grade garten 1 2 3 4 10 2 1 1 5 7 15 5 6 7 8 Not over one week late ..12 43 5 3 1 2 11 13 5 3 2 6 14 6 3 1 1 1 10 10 6 i i 3 8 9 3 I 1 2 4 2 2 I 2 8 1 i i 4 3 1 week but not over 2 weeks late .. ... 6 2 weeks but not over 3 weeks late 3 3 weeks but not over 4 weelts late ... 1 4 weeks but not over 6 weeks late _ 2 6 weeks but not over 10 weeks late 7 Over ten weeks late . 9 40 78 30 32 41 19 20 15 10 Time Allotment It is possible to give only the most general idea of the amount of time allotted to each subject in each grade in Grand Junction. E,ach teacher is a law unto herself as to her time schedule, and she may modify her program of study and recitation to suit what she regards the special demands of her room, except in so far as she must meet the schedule of the special instructors. This is a splendid system, as long as the schools are blessed with excellent teachers and adequate supervision of the constructive kind. It must be understood, then, that the following tabluation of the time allotment shows only an approximation. It is based on a comparison of the programs of the various teachers having the same grades. The towns used for comparison with Grand Junction on this point are the selected Colorado towns from which returns had been received before this report went to the printer. (36) -! -^ Q-t r-l ^J^2 ^ lid O rK IC3 f G^/ (7^ Oi D O If3 lO trt c^ t* t- O 8S8 O O 10 o lO O lO O O $5^52 S55 oS 8 s g g 8 8 :g : S O xO tO i lO O lO lO t"" (N < t lO t" 885||^ io r- o ' o ko t rt i ^^ -*H 8885888 c 'S S 3 ^3 F" 1 ^ f-t '_ "rt 03 CC ft lO i i C5 G^J i i C> 8 ! ! \ O O i O lO M i C> S. .o i i r 8 <-'u o * o c .2 s g a -2 -2 & S S -g .22 -r- ^l! 'S -3 1 1 i o88l|! !<< gf- 5"(/>Or"-' rfiiH a J S' B.^S 3IS! *8.|' Eo || 2 ^ -r P < sr ? 5' >-(, . 2 ** IS 5! 2 o ag o h^ o M* I i | .Ok ,32 5s .00 .00 Ij-QQ -' h^ CJ^ ra c ^ is O &&'$ 88 i CO W CO Oi C?^ fa IS ii s& C" *- Ifc- 00 M r>8a o o S 5 p, a f B o a$ 5 : _Sr I ll.a 3 4^- >i.^ - >^ J CO ,916 79, 4.00 .00 ts p* 00 00 5-is s (48) The tax rate for schools has grown steadily but slowly, due partly to the decrease in assessed valuation for the district. The rate for the city has changed but little. The Cause of Increase The tax rate in mills does not cover one most important item, viz., the tax for special improvement districts in the city. This can appear only from an examination of the revenue levied, which is reported by the County Treasurer to be nearly identical with the amount raised. Under an apparent decrease of both population and valuation, the people of this district will pay $53,929.28 more tax in 1916 than in 1912. In the face of most distressing econom- ic pressure, the community has lifted the taxes enormously. For what?. The last column of Table No. 6 shows. Next after the county administration, the schools have been least responsible for this increase. The people have voted upon themselves over $36,- 000 annual increase for particular improvements within the city. (See plate, page 49.) * Showing the Relative Increase in Taxes for five different purposes from 1912 to 1916. . (50) Comparative Tax Rates To know what Grand Junction pays for its schools does not enable one to decide whether those expenses are in all respects reasonable. Comparisons with the practice of other properly selected school systems over the state will warrant a judgment. TABLE NO. 7. Showing the Levy in Mills for Schools and for City Purposes in Sixteen Cities. For Local Schools. For City Purposes. Mills Mills Rocky Ford 5.85 Loveland 5.25 Leadville 6.30 Salida 5.30 Fort Collins 7.00 Greeley , 6.00 Longmont 7.20 Longmont 6.00 Colorado City 7.25 Durango 6.70 Fort Morgan 7.40 Boulder 7.50 Loveland 7.50 Fort Collins 7.50 Boulder 7.75 Fort Morgan 7.50 Delta 8.00 Grand Junction 8.00 Durango 8.50 La Junta 8.00 Salida 8.60 Delta 8.50 Grand Junction 8.61 Canon City 9.00 La Junta 8.80 Colorado City 10.00 3anon City 9.50 Trinidad 10.00 Greeley 9.60 Rocky Ford 10.50 Trinidad 10.30 Leadville 23.50 Table No. 7 shows the rate in sixteen Colorado cities for gen- eral city purposes and for the schools of the district in which the city is located. According to this table Grand Junction is pay- ing a city rate that may be termed average, and a rate for schools that is somewhat above the average. Relation of School Taxes to Other Taxes But if money be scarce or children plentiful, some cities must on account of local conditions pay a higher rate of tax than others to maintain equal standards in their educational systems. A good second test is the relative effort put forth by the community for its schools and for other interests. Some cities regard schools as of more importance than pavements and sidewalks; others take the opposite view. Table No. 8 is derived from Table No. 7 and shows the ratio of the rate for schools to the rate for general pur- poses. TABLE NO. 8. Showing the Ratio of Tax Rate for Schools to Tax Rate for City Purposes. Leadville 27 Rocky Ford 56 Colorado City 725 Fort Collins . 93 Delta 94 Fort Morgan 99 Trinidad 1.03 Boulder . ..1.03 (51) TABLE NO. 8 Continued. Showing the Ratio of Tax Rate for Schools to Tax Rate for City Purposes. Canon City 1.06 Grand Junction 1.08 La Junta 1.10 Longmont . 1.20 Durango ...1.27 Loveland 1.43 Greeley 1.60 Salida 1.62 It must be remembered that Table No. 8 does not reckon the taxes paid in Grand Junction and many other places for special improvements. Were this item figured in, the ratio for Grand Junction would be .61 instead of 1.08. Table No. 8 reveals Grand Junction as standing slightly 'above the average in the stress it places on schools. (See plate below.) Rocky Ford Leadville Ft Collins Longmonf Colorado, City Ft? Morgan Loveland Boulder Delta Dvrango Salida GRAND JUNCTION La Junta Canon City Greeley Trinidad Mill l.eyy for school purposes Mill levy farcify purposes Showing the Rank of Grand Junction in amount of Tax Levied for Schools and the Relative Amount of Tax levied for School and City Purposes in Sixteen Cities. (52) Where Does the Money Go? Still it is conceivable that school population may be so large in proportion to taxable property that the rate of tax may be fair- ly high and increasing, that it may be large as measured by the tax for non-educational purposes, and yet be insufficient to main- tain satisfactory schools. Before one reaches any final conclu- sion as to reasonableness or economy, the expenditures for schools- must be studied. Table No. 9 shows the outlay for schools in this district for the last ten years. O "-O C O CO O nf!!l 01 45 CO l>0 H*. O $2 5 3 f sisssssi | r I* w 1? ? w SB The considerable building operations of several years ago, necessitated by the steadily increasing attendance, had much to do with causing total expenditures to reach their highest point in 1909-10. Since then the total cost (see last column of Table No. 9) has slipped back about 20 per cent. The expense for sites, buildings and other permanent improvements, has almost ceased ; that for interest on bonds and some other small items is a fixed (53) expense and can not be reduced, since it grows out of obligations already assumed by the district. Payment of bonds, however, can be deferred by reissuance. The one item that can not be eliminated without closing the schools or even considerably reduced without changing in a marked way their organization and efficiency, is the cost of ope- ration. Table No. 9 shows that the disbursements for salaries have grown somewhat since 1909-10, but current expenses have decreased an equal amount. Consequently, the total for opera- tion has remained almost stationary since 1909-10, though be- fore that time it increased very rapidly. Why Has the Cost Grown? The inquiry of the taxpayers is: What is the justification for the increase in cost of operation from 1904-5 to 1914-15? Does it mean waste, or does it stand for better educational con- ditions? The data of Table No. 10 answer this question in part. TABLE NO. 10 Showing the Relation of Attendance to Teaching Force and Cost of Operation co> +2 o> J 1? <|f *<^ s !, * s e bin ^ bOtl.S-S ~ o> & 3 3 * 5 cd H rt -$ ^oiS^ PE- |3> <|I 3-3J c. , |a 12 J EH O : a r 2 0- " 1904-05 ..1670 1239 36 46 34 $25.64 1909-10 2100 1608 59 36 27 41.88 1910-11 2107 1568 59 36 27 43.01 1911-12 2025 1575 59 34 27 43.28 1912-13 2123 1569 59 37 27 41.GO 1913-14 2019 1590 59 34 27 41.61 1914-15 1985 1585 60 33 26 42.15 The important conclusions to be drawn from this table are that (1) The cost per pupil increased about 60 per cent from 1905 to 1910, but has varied little since 1910. (2) The enrollment and attendance increased; 25-30 per cent from 1905 to 1910, but have stood practically at a level since 1910. (3) The teaching force grew from 36 to 59 from 1905 to 1910, but has not been further increased. (4) The number of pupils per teacher was forced down materially up to 1910. Since then it has scarcely changed. Unquestionably a teacher can with 26 pupils do work much superior to what she can do with 34. 1. The data printed here have been taken from the office of the Board of Edu- cation and from compilations furnished by the County Treasurer. The num- ber of teachers for any year is of course the greatest number working at any one time. The reader, will note that the number of teachers in 1904-5 was not 28, as a recent report indicated. Thirty-six names appear on the annual report of the Secretary to the County Superintendent. (54) In short, the net result of the ten years is a much larger cost per pupil because of the increase in the number of teachers in proportion to attendance, and also because of the increase of salaries, as will appear subsequently. Are the Schools Too Costly? To determine the wisdom of returning to the conditions of ten years ago, we must decide whether the cost per pupil in Grand Junction is now unreasonably high, whether the number of teach- ers is excessive, and whether their salaries are too high. The first two questions are answered by Table No. 11. TABLE NO. 11. Showing the Average Cost per Pupil and the Average Attend- ance per Teacher in Nineteen Schools. (1) Cost of operation per pupil in aver- Average attend- age attendance in ance per teacher 1914-15 in 1914-15 Loveland $32.18 Salida 29.9 Salida 36.32 Loveland 28.2 Montrose 36.75 Longmont 27.5 Longmont 36.89 Rocky Ford 27.2 Delta 39.64 Greeley 26.8 Fort Collins 40.64 Fort Collins 26.7 Rocky Ford 41.26 Trinidad 26.5 Grand Junction 42.23 Grand Junction 26.4 Walsenburg 44.03 Boulder 26.0 Boulder 45.46 Montrose 25.9 Leadville 46.35 Leadville 25.3 Fort Morgan 46.48 Glenwood Springs 24.6 Trinidad 46.51 Delta 24.3 Greeley 47.15 Cripple Creek 23.8 La Junta 48.58 Fort Morgan 23.6 Glenwood Springs 48.67 La Junta 22.5 Colorado City 52.98 Walsenburg 22.5 Cripple Creek 57.09 Colorado City 21.7 Canon City 57.35 Canon City 19.7 According to this table, of 19 comparable towns eleven had a greater cost per pupil in 1914-15 than Grand Junction, and seven had a smaller cost. Are Teachers Too Numerous? Of these same 19 towns seven only had more crowded schools than did Grand Junction. If the teaching force were re- duced until the basis of 1904-5 (34 pupils per teacher), were re- stored, this district would be in a class by itself. The true basis of comparison in all these matters is contemporary conditions in other similar schools, and not former conditions in Grand Junc- tion. I. Some towns given in this table have county high schools, but in all cases the results are based on grades and high school taken together. (55) The Salary Question The proposal to reduce salaries has been made so insistently that it demands more detailed examination. The salary question has many sides. Some teachers may be paid too high, others too low, whereas the average may be fair. In Table No. 12 is given the standing of Grand Junction as to the salaries paid the Super- intendent and the High School Principal. TABLE NO. 12. Showing the Salaries of Colorado Superintendents and High-School Principals, 1915-16. Superintendent No. of As- Annual sistant Salary Teachers Rocky Ford $1700 37 Delta 1700 35 Colorado City 1700 28 Salida 1800 27 Glenwood Springs . 1800 17 Loveland 1900 47 Longmont 2000 45 Leadville 2000 44 Lamar 2000 26 Walsenburg 2100 23 Fort Morgan 2200 52 Canon City 2200 46 Montrose 2300 51 Fort Collins 2400 60 Boulder 2500 71 Durango 2500 30 La Junta 2600 48 Greeley 2700 67 Grand Junction 2750 58 Cripple Creek 3000 78 Trinidad 3000 71 High-School Principal Annual Average Salary Daily Attendance Montrose (Supt. acts.) Loveland $1125 243 Glenwood Springs. 1125 103 Fort Morgan 1200 190 Salida 1200 161 Colorado City 1200 89 Lamar 1215 176 La Junta 1400 219 Delta 1400 199 Rocky Ford 1450 170 Durango 1485 224 Leadville 1500 141 Canon City 1575 194 Walsenburg 1625 71 Longmont 1700 265 Cripple Creek 1770 177 Greeley 1800 462 Fort Collins 1800 325 Trinidad 2000 400 Grand Junction .. 2100 294 Boulder . . 2500 567 If the work of the Superintendent be gauged by the number of assistants he has, Grand Junction stands sixth in the list of 21. Gauging the work of the High-School Principal by the aver- age daily attendance for October, 1915, (D Grand Junction stands fifth in a list of 20. In salary paid to these two men, Grand Junction stands third in the case of the Superintendent and second in the case of the Principal. Excluding the Superintendent, High-School Principal, and special supervisors (unless the latter spend ten or more periods per week in high school), the comparable Colorado systems are arranged in Table No. 13 according to the average salaries paid high-school teachers and grade teachers. 1. Number of assistants can not be taken because several divide time be- tween the high school and the grades. (56) TABLE NO. 13. Showing the Average Annual Salaries of Teachers, 1915-16 In High In Elemen- School tary Schools Walsenburg $ 831.50 Fort Morgan (1).. $639.00 Loveland 832.00 Delta 647.00 Delta 845.00 Walsenburg 649.00 Glenwood Springs.. 847.00 Longmont 682.00 Lamar 855.00 Salida 686.00 Rocky Ford 899.00 Fort Collins 703.00 Montrose 917.00 Rocky Ford 704.00 La Junta 934.00 Canon City 732.00 Fort Morgan 958.00 Montrose 742.00 Salida 972.00 Glenwood Springs 745.00 Colorado City 987.00 Leadville 750.00 Leadville 989.00 Grand Junction ... 759.00 Grand Junction 994.00 Boulder 765.00 Canon City 1015.00 Cripple Creek 806.00 Longmont 1033.00 Trinidad 831.00 Durango 1042.00 Colorado City 870.00 Greeley 1078.00 Cripple Creek 1089.00 Fort Collins 1106.00 Trinidad 1109.00 Boulder 1145.00 In a group of 21, Grand Junction falls to ninth place in sal- aries of its high-school teachers; in a group of 16, it is fifth in salaries paid grade teachers. Have Salaries Increased? The suggestion has been made that Grand Junction has stead- ily raised the salaries of its teachers, and that the teachers should be willing to assist the community by agreeing to a temporary cut in salary. But since no one has suggested the application of this principle to any other class of workers than teachers, this propo- 3ition must be examined with some care. Have salaries of teach- ers in Grand Junction really increased? Table No. 14 makes it clear that they have absolutely. But salaries have increased abso- lutely in all lines of employment, because the cost of living has advanced. In fact the general rise in cost of living tends to be reflected pretty closely by the general rise of wages. TABLE NO. 14. Showing the Average Salaries of Grand Junction Teachers (2) Since 1904-5. Year 1904-5 1910-11 1915-16 High School $630 $975 $994 ($898.50 for women) Elementary Schools 625 700 759 - To find whether teachers in Grand Junction are actually better paid now than ten years ago, the Committee gathered 1. For 1914-15. 'I. Excluding Superintendent, High-School Principal, and special supervisors with less than ten periods per week in high school. (57) a body of information regarding remuneration in other fields. The increases in Grand Junction for the past decade are as follows : City firemen, from $65 to $75 per month 15 percent Bricklayers, from $5 to $6 per day 20 percent Carpenters, from $3.75 to $4.50 per day 20 percent Laborers in building trades, from $2.50 to $3 per day 20 percent Grade teachers, from $625 to $759 per year 21 percent Common laborers employed by the city (hours reduced from ten to eight), from $2 to $2.50 per day 25 percent Painters and Paperhangers, from $3 to $4 per day 33 1-3 percent Clerks (estimate of a leading merchant) 33 1-3 per cent High school teachers (women only), from $630 to $898.50 per year 41 percent Printers, including foremen, compositors and pressmen, have variously increased from $18 to $21-24 per week, amounting to 16 2-3 33 1-3 per cent. Clerks and assistants in the county of- fices have been raised from $78 to $82.50 per month, with book- keepers running at $90, $110 and $115 per month; the increase then would vary from 6 per cent to over 45 per cent. The increase for women teachers only is figured in the high school, because women only were working as assistants in 1904-5, whereas such is not the case now. . Were the term of school reduced to 36 iveeks and teachers' salaries reduced accordingly, the rates of increase for the ten years in grades and high school would sink to 15 per cent and 35 per cent respectively. If we add to this mass of evidence certain other facts relating to the cost of living, which is 20-25 per cent higher in Grand Junction now than ten years ago, it is almost certain that salaries of grade teachers have not increased since 1904-5, and that salaries in high school have increased only 15-20 per cent. Percentage Cost for Different Purposes There remains only the problem of economy. Can existing costs be reduced without impairing efficiency? The Committee has given very careful attention to the several suggestions of citi- zens and taxpayers, whether expressed by bodies or by individu- als. The relative cost for different purposes has been calculated for the schools of many cities of five to ten thousand, and the re- sults have been published by the United States Bureau of Educa- tion. The Grand Junction system has been tested by this cri- terion. The per cent of the total operating expenses that goes for different purposes is shown in Table No. 15 for Grand Junc- tion together with the average for 48 other cities, one of which was selected from each state. Figures for Grand Junction are for 1914-15, except for special supervisors, where the approxi- mate cost for 1915-16 is used. ' (58) TABLE NO. 15. Showing the Approximate Per Cent of Total Operating Ex- penses for Six Different Purposes. PURPOSE Grand 48 Other Junction Cities Administration 9.3 7.1 Wages of Janitors 7.42 6.37 Fuel 1.26 3.25 Libraries and Textbooks 3.34 2.41 Special Supervisors 7.55 3.92 Total Salaries (excluding superin- tendent) 71.53 70.64 Reducing Cost of Administration The Administration costs include salaries and expenses of the Superintendent, his clerk, the Secretary of the Board, and the truant officer; election expenses; the school census; operation and maintenance of the offices; legal service and auditing; sta- tionery and postage for general office. The preceding table shows that administrative costs in this system are about $1400- 1500 more than the total cost of the system would lead one to expect. The Committee is of the opinion that by a union of the offices of Superintendent and Secretary the present work of two clerical employees can be performed by one. The school census, which has been taken by other parties at additional cost, can be taken by the truant officer, who should be placed on a contract of nine months instead of twelve. At the expiration of his pres- ent contract and during the existing financial depression the Superintendent might fairly be asked to pay his own expenses to educational gatherings in consideration of the comparatively sat- isfactory salary he receives. But should the Board deem it wise to continue the present arrangement, the Committee suggests that the allowance be made after the expense has been incurred and upon the presentation of vouchers, rather than beforehand ac- cording to a lump estimate prepared by the Superintendent. Reducing the Cost of Janitor Service The janitor service is performed by the employees of a chief engineer, who takes the entire contract on a bid of approximate- ly $5,100, including responsibility for maintenance of clocks. This contract is granted without competition. The proper expense for this service is lowered by such factors as the reduction in num- ber of heating plants by grouping buildings; the presence of lights in buildings to enable a janitor to do all his own work in- stead of hiring helpers on short winter days ; the performance of skilled labor by the janitors to dispense with or reduce bills for carpenters, glaziers, etc. The Committee has considered these matters in relation to the Grand Junction situation, and has can- vassed the approximate cost of labor employed by the chief engi- neer. Its conclusion, based also upon Table No. 15, is that the cost for this item should be reduced about 15 per cent by a resort to competitive bids if necessary. (59) The economy in fuel is a striking feature, the cost being less than half the normal. The condition, however, has not always been so satisfactory. Fuel shows a very heavy decrease immediately after a heavy expense for plumbing and heating. The efficiency of different heating plants, or janitors, can be studied from the variations in cost per room in the larger buildings. The advan- tage of a central heating plant is 40-50 per cent, and goes a long way to explain the low cost for fuel in the whole system. The re- sult of high ceilings, of large and somewhat wasteful halls, is evi- dent, too, in the differences between the three buildings which have their own plants. TABLE NO. 16 Showing the Expense for Plumbing and Heating, and Fuel Cost for Fuel per Room I flf ! | I S . ^ fa j 1911-2 . ...$ 319.75 $1,246.35 1912-3 1,930.73 1,432.47 21.19 36.61 31.63 17.79 1913-4 109.26 983.81 16.19 22.82 24.32 11.97 1914-5 66.75 842.72 14.56 19.79 23.92 9.10 Reducing the Cost for Books The book bill for 1914-15 was $2,238.65, whkh is $240 less than in the preceding year. Stricter economy might easily have been practiced in this particular. Other than reading books have been duplicated in some of the grade rooms. For the collateral reading in High School English two or three times the required number of copies have been purchased in a number of cases. Reducing the Expense for Special Supervisors Table No. 15 also indicates too large an expense for special supervisors. This excess may be partly apparent because of the difficulty of separating special teachers from special supervisors. The Committee is not disposed to pass upon the special subjects in a wholesale manner, but to recommend reductions where little or least harm will result. The very active life of young children reduces their need of directed physical training to the provision of suitable playground equipment and supervision of the playground by the teachers. The size of the children and the character of their clothing will permit them to practice suitable exercises during school hours under the direction of their regular teachers. A physical director should be retained on half time for the girls of the grammar grades and the High School. Space for dressing quarters and class exercises can be found in the High School building, and the contract with the Y. M. C. A. can be discontinued. The older boys are less inclined to sedentary lives. Pnter-school and inter- (60) class contests can be arranged and directed by the regular faculty. Rarely do schools the size of Grand Junction pay for coaches out- side the faculty. A part-time supervisor of penmanship is not sufficient to do this special work satisfactorily. The position should be dis- continued until a full-time supervisor can be engaged. Manual Training suited to grades below the sixth, and pos- sibly the seventh, can be handled by the teachers of the respective rooms. Unless the equipment can be installed to place the work on a proper basis for the High School and upper grades, the de- partment should be discontinued. In any case, it should be re- moved from its present quarters, where its confusion hampers other instruction. The room occupied by the Commercial Depart- ment would be a good place for it. Household Arts must occupy a large place in the practical lives of a great majority of the girls. Music ought to be prom- inent in the recreational lives of all. Neither of these subjects can receive effective, much less unified treatment by regular teachers. The Committee favors strongly the continuance of both departments. Reducing the Cost for Kindergartens The public kindergarten is not necessarily a feature in cities the size of Grand Junction. It has undoubted advantages, yet it is patronized by only a small part of the eligible children. Distance from the one building where it is operated prohibits the attend- ance of many. It is a valuable adjunct to, but not an integral part of the public-school system. Hence there is nothing incon- sistent with asking those who desire kindergarten privileges to pay for them as any other private facility is paid for. The Com- mittee favors the abolition of the kindergarten until economic conditions improve. Reducing the Cost for Commercial Instruction The function of a commercial department is much broader than the mere development of typists, stenographers, and book- keepers for the business world. In this department alone can we familiarize the student with a great section of life, which touches all normal people and which falls outside the conventional pale of all other departments. Question has been raised as to the cost of the commercial instruction. Since it is a regular department of the High School, its cost should be compared with that of other departments. Table No. 17 presents (1) the total cost of each department of the High School, (2) the average size of classes, (3) the periods per week taught by each teacher, (4) the per cent constituted by each department of the total number of periods, or "hours," spent by all students under instruction, and (5) the cost in cents of one "hour" of instruction for a student. (61) TABLE NO. 17 Showing Relative Costs of High-School Departments. (1) g 5 N CQ I English $2,660 19.5 25 23.7 4.6 Latin 1,634 17. 25 12.7 5.5 German 722 18. 25 5.9 5.2 History and Civics.. 2,304 (1634) 20. 25 14.4 6.8 (4.8) Mathematics 1,716 23. 25 17.0 4.3 Science 2,613 (1911) 16.5 27 13.8 8.0 (5.7) Household Arts.... 244 17.5 35 2.8 3.7 Commercial 1,423 (1164) 1. 30 9.6 6.3 (4.9) The six numbers placed in parentheses show results by a second method of figuring. The principal, assistant principal, and supervisor of writing teach in the Science, History, and Com- mercial departments respectively. If the actual salaries paid these teachers be charged to the particular departments, the first figure in each case is correct; but if their salaries be charged to their respective departments at the regular high-school maxi- mum of $950 per year, the amounts in parentheses are correct. In either case the cost per instruction hour in commercial subjects ranks above the average in spite of the larger number of hours per week worked by the teacher. This comes from tne small classes, the average being only 15. The Committee recommends a contraction of the teaching force of this department to practic- ally one teacher, and the removal of the department to the present offices of the Superintendent. Several disadvantages now inhere in isolating commercial students from the rest of the High School. Reducing the Length of the School Term The progress of education points undoubtedly toward the lengthening of the school term. Many schools now continue forty or more weeks per year. The tendency is toward an all-year school. Grand Junction took a step in advance when the term of school was increased from 36 to 38 weeks. It is therefore with reluctance that the Committee advises a temporary reduction of the term to 36 weeks. It is true that only about a dozen districts 1. No available published study of high-school costs gives the method of com- putation. It was therefore necessary to adopt a basis of our own, which is as follows: a. To each department is charged such part of each teacher's salary as is proportionate to the amount of time he spends in that department. b;. The cost of a teacher is based on instruction only, no allowance being made for duty in the study hall or out of school. c. The size of class is the average of the total enrollment for the semester and the number remaining to the close of the semester. d. The size of the class is multiplied by the number of periods per week spent under the teacher, and their product is multiplied by 38, the num- ber of weeks in the year, to secure the total number of "instruction hours." The basis then becomes the time spent by the student under the teacher, and has no definite relation to the credit carried by the course. (62) in the state now have over 36 weeks; but the reluctance of the Committee comes principally from the fact that this will mean a reduction in salaries of the rank and file of teachers. Tuition Students Minor sources of possible leakage have been examined. Dis- tricts supporting high schools are liable to imposition by neigh- bors without high schools. It is possible that in Grand Junction some pupils, liable for tuition, have escaped paying it. A study of the relative proportion of new students in High School and in grades convinces the Committee that there are hardly a half dozen attending the Grand Junction High School without tuition, whose parents are without a legal residence in the district. This makes no allowance for that handful of ambitious young men and women who are self-supporting and may claim residence for themselves. Tuition in the High School is $45 per year, which is slightly less than the cost of instruction; in the grades it is $30 per year, which is somewhat more than the cost of instruction. This is as it should be. The Telephone Exchange In 1912 a telephone exchange was installed in the school sys- tem on a five-year contract, but without initial cost. With ten tele- phones in the system and a certain amount of long-distance calls, the telephone bill for 1914-15 was approximately $317. This is over $100 less than the cost would have been without the exchange. The saving of time to the Superintendent and princi- pals may be considered at least to offset the trouble to the office of acting as its own "central." Leave of Absence to Teachers The rule for granting leave to teachers allows not to exceed four weeks per year on sick leave at half pay, and four days at full pay on account of death in one's immediate family. There is no evidence that advantage has been taken of the latter; in 1914-15 four teachers lost in all 12 1-2 days under this clause. During the same year a total of 14 teachers received 23 days pay for 46 days missed on account of sickness. The half-pay rule is not common, but it is very efficient. The various recommendations of the Committee may be sum- marized as providing for the following reductions in annual ex- pense : Administration _s. < $1,300 Janitor Service 750 Special Supervisors 2,750 Kindergarten 1,500 Commercial Department 500 Reduction of School Term 2,750 Substitution of Special Teacher of Ungraded Room for Batavian System 400 TOTAL $9,950 The Committee wishes in conclusion to reiterate that several of these reductions are advisable only pending the return of more prosperous times to the people of Grand Junction. (63) SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The present Batavian system to be abolished and to be replaced by an ungraded room in charge of an especially strong teacher. Pupils who do not "fit" in any particular grade when entering the schools of Grand Junction, those who after receiving special help from the regular class-room teacher cannot do the work of the grade in which they are x placed, and those pupils who may find it possible to do the work of two grades in less than two years to be placed in this room until ready to take-up the work with some regular grade. 2. Entrance examinations by the superintendent in the case of Elementary School pupils to be abolished in case the pupil comes from a school of good standing with proper credentials. Such pupils to be assigned to their proper grades and to be given a fair trial before being demoted. 3. The Principal of the High School to be relieved of some teach- ing duties and to be given immediate supervision of the High School, subject, of course, to the general supervision of the Superintendent. 4. The Superintendent to give more time to supervision, especi- ally in the Elementary grades. 5. An Intermediate School consisting of the Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Grades to be organized and located in the Frank- lin Building with the overflow, if any, placed in either the N Lowell or Whittier building. The program of studies in this school to be in part optional; the instruction to be depart- mental ; and the school to receive very careful supervision. 6. The present Kindergarten system to be abolished until eco- * nomic conditions are better. 7. The present school term to be reduced to nine months and cor- responding reductions to be made in annual salaries where present contract does not hold over. 8. The Superintendent's office to be moved to the Whittier Building and the duties of the Secretary to the Superintend- ent and of the Secretary of the Board to be performed by one Secretary. 9. The school census to be taken by the Secretary or by the tru- ant officer. 10. The truant officer to be employed only during the school year. 11. The present system of janitorial work to be changed. If this work is to be done by contract, competitive bids to be secured although the Board should not obligate itself to accept the lowest. (64) department to be installed in the High School building in the present offices of the Superintendent. 13. The work of the Commercial Department to be given by one teacher. 14. The present position of Supervisor of Penmanship to be abol- ished until economic conditions become better. 15. The present position of Manual Training Supervisor to be abolished until economic conditions become better. When this department is re-established more and better equipment to be provided and the work limited to pupils in the Inter- mediate and the High Schools. The work now done by this Supervisor below the Seventh Grade to be done so far as pos- sible by regular class-room teachers. 16. The present position of Supervisor of Physical Training to be changed so that the work of the Instructor is limited to the girls of the Seventh and Eighth Grades and the High School. This to be a part-time position. 17. No Athletic Coach, outside of the school faculty, to be em- ployed. 18. The present contract with the Y. M. C. A. to be discontinued after this year. INDEX Page. Batavian system 12 Census, enrollment and buildings 9 Control Application of general principles to schools of Grand Junction 18 Lay 16 Professional 17 Relation of lay and professional 17 Cost of schools Comparison with other systems 54 Division among six different items 58 Reduction of ,. 58 Relative cost of High School departments 61 Course of study Elementary school 35 High school 41 Discipline 42 Divisions of the school 9 Financial support (Chapter III.) 45 Grade repetition 12 Grading and examinations... 14 Indebtedness , 45 Instruction (Chapter II.) 22 Intermediate school 14 Late entrance 35 Organization and control (Chapter I.) 9 Recommendations, Summary of 63 Retardation and acceleration 10 Sanitation Conditions described 15 Recommendations ., 15 Sources of revenue 45 Study periods 42 Supervision Description of system 19 Recommendations , 20 Taxation Increase since 1912 47 For various purposes 47 Comparison with other cities 50 Teachers Leave of absence 62 Preparation and training 43 Salaries 55 Telephone exchange 62 Tests Arithmetic 30 Penmanship 25 Reading 26 Spelling , 22 Time allotment 36 Tuition students 62 Ungraded room 13 YC 55926 UNIVERSITY OF CAUFORNIA LIBRARY