■I'".'." •■"".: .^j.:viiiAi.'/l/r/f. i/jJMiJJJJ////Mj/,- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES * SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT BY ROBERT M . r H h: O B A L D, iM . A . (Author of " Detlironing Shakespeare" : former Editor of " The Bacon journal "). .9 • •• » SAN J-K.\.\(;i.s(() : JOHN HOWKLL, 4;,4. Post Strkkt. PKtNTF.D nv THf. MARSHALL Pk^:SS, LTD., LONDON, \V.C.2. >'. 5? T3fs .^ Obcroii. — Now, my Titania, wake you, my sweet Queen ! (J Titania. — My Oberon ! what visions have I seen ! Methought I was enamoured of an ass. Oberon. — There lies your love ! Titania. How came these things to pass ? O, how mine eyes do loath his visage now. Obci on. — Silence awhile ! Robin, take off this head. r^ ' M. N. D. ^ Are you native of this place ? Your accent is something finer than you could purchase in so removed a dwelling. As You Like It. What a thrice-double ass Was I, to take this drunkard for a god, And worship this dull fool ! Tempest. Ass ! I'll take that burden from your back. King'J^oJin. rl\A o 1978')9 TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE Preface . . . . . . . . . ix. Chap. I. — Preliminaries . . . . . . i Chap. II. — Presumptive Evidence . . . lo Section i. Shakspere's Personal History . . .10 2. Greene's Groatsworth of Wit . . 13 3. Probabilities . . . . .16 4. The Lawyer . . . . .18 5. The Aristocrat . . . . .20 6. The Classical Scholar .... 24 7. Various Accomplishments . . -24 8. Shakspere Biography . . . 26 Chap. III. — Francis Bacon . . . . . .32 Section i. The Scholar and Man of the World . . 32 2. The Poet . . . . . -34 3. Bacon's Concealments • • • 35 4. Bacon's Literary Output . . . -3^ 5. Bacon's Assurance of Immortality . . 40 6. Personal Characteristics , . . -43 » » >» it It (i) Striking the Breast ... 43 (2) Bacon's Fall . . . -45 (3) Bacon's Self -vindication . . 47 (4) Bacon's Dramatic Faculty . . 48 (5) Bacon's Verdict against Himself . 49 Chap. IV.— I Cannot Tell . . . . . 54 Chap. V. — Companionship in Calamity . . .64 Chap. VI.— The Philosophy of Wonder. . . .80 Chap. VII. — Bacon's Philosophy of Hope . . . 95 VI CONTENTS. PAGE Chap. VII I. —B icon's " Sai tor Resartus" . 109 Section i. Garment ot Folly 113 n -• » State and Pride • 113 3- It Sobriety or Sadness 114 4- » Mirth ' . 114 » 5- )> Humility 115 6. >> Virtue . 115 7- » Content 116 8. >) Sanctity . 117 9- !' Love 117 „ lO. }} Strangeness . . 117 Chap. IX. — Love and Business : liacon's Essay of Love com- pared with the Treatment of Love in Shake- speare ...... The Problem .... Mistaken View of the Essay . The Essay of Love : Its Real Import . Bacon's Praise of the Worthiest Affection . Restricted Use of Love in Shakespeare . Love in the Historical Plays . Love in the Tragedies Love in the Comedies Love always Subordinate in Shakespeare Love in the Minor Poems Love Lyrics . . . . Conclusions ..... The yEthiope . . . . Love Engendered in the Eye Folly and Love Connected General!}- . Chap. X. — Pliilosophical Maxims .... Section i. Mines and Forges Section I. n 2. }> .1- J) 4- n 3- 7) 6. y} 7- }} 8. a 9- l> 10. }} II. »> 12. M 13- )> 14. M 15- 2. Miracles and Misery 3- Sunshine Everywhere 4- The Genesis of Poetr> 5- Money and Muck . 6. Pilst and Future 7- 8. Impossibilities Piiysiognomy. 9- Sleep 126 127 127 129 130 131 133 136 143 154 156 157 159 160 161 163 167 167 171 174 178 179 180 182 184 185 CONTENTS. Vll PAGE Section lo. Nature and Art .... 187 ,, ri. Nature and Fortune . . . .188 „ 12. Primum Mobile .... 191 ,, 13. Philosophia Prima .... 194 ,, 14. Conclusion ..... 197 Chap. XI. — The Promus ...... 199 The Procus ..... 208 Hail of Pearl . . . . .212 Ulysses. . . . . .213 Voluntary Forgetting . . . .216 Like One's Self. .... 218 Chap. XII. — -Echoes and Correspondencies . . . 223 Chap. XIII. — The Scholarship of Shakespeare . . 286 Section i. Classic Allusions ..... 294 „ 2. The Classical Plays .... 308 „ 3. Grammatical Forms .... 309 Chap. XIV. — The Classic Diction of Shakespeare . .318 Appendix ox Marlowe ...... 415 IxDKX I. — Shakespeare Quotations .... 489 „ II. — ^Classical Words in Chap. xiv. .... 492 ,, III.- — General : Topics and Names . . . 497 Section I. j> 2. )i 0- >> 4- >} 5* PREFACE. In the world's literature the greatest name is Shakespeare. Equally true is the assertion that in the world's literature there is no greater name than Bacon. Shakespeare and Bacon, if they are to be distinguished, were contem- poraries ; the apparatus of scholarship, books, colleges, teachers, and all the accumulations of literary creation, which they used, were the same for both. If they stood on an equal literary level they must have cHmbed the heights by the same paths, and at much the same time, and one would think they must have elbowed one another during the ascent. And yet neither of them refers to the other, even by the most covert allusion. Still the identical culture must assert itself whether it is acknowledged or not, and accordingly we find that the two groups of writings perpetually touch one another, and each may supply the other with innumerable lights of interpretation. Notwithstanding these cross lights of mutual reflection, the separate students of each seem resolved to keep them apart. In the elucidation of Bacon's philosophy Shakespeare is neglected, in the interpretation of Shakespeare's poetry Bacon is neglected. If any comparison is made between them it is usually one rather of grammatical form and structure, than of interior soul and substance. At the same time it is a commonplace in Bacon biography to bracket the two names together as representing literary production equal in value, and similar in quality : though as a rule this approximation is expressed in general terms, while particular applications are rarely supplied. One of X PREFACE. the reasons for this, with the more recent critics and biographers, is a most tremulous timidity arising out of an apprehension of being compromised by association with that most obnoxious group of quasi-hterary persons who advocate the personal identit}' of Bacon and Shakespeare. If some singular resemblance in thought or expression is pointed out, the critic hastens to separate himself from those who see more in this than a casual and quite acci- dental resemblance. " Do not suppose," the critic eagerly explains, "that I assert that Bacon wrote Shakespeare, because I point out these identities in style or idea : ' — the imputation is too terrible, and the critic protests his orthodox}' by most severe comments on the mental — almost moral — unsoundness that can arrive at such a distressing conclusion. I am persuaded that Shakespearean comment and anno- tation has suffered severely from this resolute determination to keep the two groups of writings apart; and one design of this volume is to protest against this neglect of Baconian light on Shakespeare, and to show, by signal examples, what a rich field of illustration and interpretation is thus ignored. Let these great poems, we say, be brought into relationship with all Elizabethan literature which can supply helpful elucidation. We ask for no exceptional favour for Bacon's writings — we only ask that they should take the place that rightfully belongs to them. If the result is that our theory forces itself forward either as a corollary lawfully deduced from these comments, or as a hypothesis that may be used to account for them — let it be so ; that is only fair play and no favour. But oh, most gentle and gentlemanly critics, do be patient and tolerant about it ; — be not so indelicately angry ! Cease your clamours and asperities, and denuncia- tions and vituperations, and let us talk over the matter gravely and calmly, without vulgar abuse or heated imputations ! Perfervid disputation always has a flavour not only of extravagance but of insincerity, and we PREFACE. XI Baconians find it extremely difficult to persuade ourselves that you yourselves believe all the hard things you say about us. You call us half-educated Philistines, crazy Baconizers, ignorant cranks, or mad moon-rakers, though you must know that we number in our ranks men as sound in judgment and as well equipped in learning as yourselves. It is high time that all this nonsense should stop. Such missiles do not hurt us, they would amuse us if their exhibition of bad temper were not saddening and discreditable. Our case is a very intelligible and a very lawful one. Our argument holds the field, and it has come to stay. We are quite content to abide the issue of sound reason and exhaustive research, and we decline to retaliate by the use of the weapons which are so freely employed against us. For no Baconian, so far as I know, seeks to help his cause by personal abuse or intolerant and wrathful speech. All this — as is usually the case in analogous instances — is the monopoly of the conservators, and is no part of the armoury of the innovators. Nothing can banish our thesis except demonstrative proof on a very large scale that some other explanation of the genesis of Shakespeare is more credible and better supported by facts than ours. The reader of the following pages should carefully keep in mind the distinction that is invariably observed between Shakspcre and Shakespeare. The word Shakspere always means Mr. William Shakspere, of Stratford-on-Avon. The word Shakespeare always means either the writer of the plays and poems which are known by this patronymic, or else the poetry itself, apart from any question of author- ship. And when I speak of Shakespeare as an author, or of the collected writings under this title, I do so " without prejudice." By using current phraseology I make no concession to current notions attached to it. It is necessary to premise this because many Baconians think that by speaking of "Shakespeare" as an author we give away our case and use language that misrepresents our Xll PREFACE. thoughts. I do not think so. My impression is that when the time comes for a general recognition of Bacon as the true Shakespeare, the poetry will still be called "Shake- speare," and that no one will find anything compromising in such language, any more than we do when we refer to George Eliot or Georges Sand, meaning Miss Evans or Madame Dudevant. In using Bacon's nom de plume we are but accepting his own leading, while we reserve an interpreta- tion which he did not himself supply, but left to posterity to discover. Indeed, the word Shaksperc itself, so spelt, is quite arbitrary. It might be Shaxpur, or Shagspur, or any of the few score spellings which were current in Warwickshire in the i6th century. Among these our particular William seems to have made no election ; for no one can find for the name any standard spelling in any of his varied and almost indecipherable signatures. One more claim I make, namely, that the Baconian theory should not be confounded with any of the specula- tions that are often associated with it — cipher speculations especially. While I may say that my own attitude towards them is chiefly sceptical, yet I decline to embarrass the main argument by these collateral and somewhat irritating discussions. R. M. Theobald. Blackheath, S.E., September, 1901. SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. CHAPTER I. PRELIMINARIES It is quite possible for whole generations of thoughtful men, and of educated, experienced critics, to entertain a belief which is absolutely unsound and absurd, without being conscious that that belief is open to debate at all. Tradition floats and supports countless errors. But it is also possible that the debateable qualit}' of the false belief may flash upon anyone's convictions instantaneously, and then for ever after it ceases to occupy any settled resting place in his mind. For example, the idea that William Shakspere wrote the plays and poems attributed to him was for me not so much a persuasion as a settled tradition, never interfered with, till one day, visiting a friend, and looking over his excellent and well-selected library, I took up Gerald Massey's book on Shakespeare's Sonnets, and asked my friend if he had formed any opinion about it. His reply was to this effect : " Doubtless the book is good enough in its way; but if you want to get clear light as to the genesis of Shakespeare's poetr}^ you should read this;" and he put into my hands Nathaniel Holmes's book on B 2 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. "The Authorship of Shakespeare." As soon as the book was in my hand, the persuasion took hold of my mind that this question of the authorship of Shakespeare was one open to debate, and that Holmes's conclusion was probably right. My conversion was of the most orthodox and instantaneous character, and the belief then adopted has never been disturbed. But although the central truth came suddenly, the reasons and arguments to support it could not thus immediately enter into the mind. That moment was the starting point of a long course of study. I read all I could get hold of by Bacon, and re-read Shakespeare, and kept the two in perpetual juxtaposition for years, until the persuasion which came by a flash of intuition ripened into a strong and well-grounded convic- tion, resting on facts and arguments, solid and secure as mathematical demonstration. Now I do not expect many persons to change their traditional belief in this rapid fashion ; but I do think that it does not require much study or painful reflection to see that the question itself is quite a lawful one, not to be settled by a snap-finger dismissal of derision The literary robe of the man, William Shakspere, is evidently a misfit ; the garment is too big and costly for his small and insignifi- cant personality. But so securely has the name of William Shakespere fastened itself on the grandest creations of all literature, that even those (perhaps especially those) who have devoted themselves to Shakesperean studies all their life, have failed to see that the previous question of author- ship has to be admitted as one element in their studies. One eminent Shakesperean writing to an equally eminent Baconian says, " We traverse your premises, Mr. S ; there is no doubt, and therefore there is no necessity for enquiry." For him then the problem is non-existent, but the unabashed dogmatism of such a settlement is rather surprising. Another distinguished Shakespearean student and author wrote to me as follows : " In the Bacon- Shakespeare controversy I take no interest whatever. To OUR GENTLE CRITICS. 3 establish the Baconian authorship of Shak=pere's works, two things have to be proved : first that Shakespeare did not write the plays and poems attributed to him, and secondly that Francis Bacon did. As I have never yet seen a prima facie case made out for the former of these propositions, I have no inclination to consider seriously the so-called arguments by which it is attempted to prove the latter." This is perfectly fair language, and with such convictions there is no reason why any attention should be given to the opposing thesis. I cannot, however, refrain from expressing my astonishment that any competent Shakespearean scholar should fail to perceive the enormous difficulty of accounting for the possession of Shakespearean attributes by such a man as William Shakspere must have been. Other critics are not so civil. Indeed, a discreditable habit has arisen of reviling and insulting those who advo- cate the Baconian authorship of Shakespeare. Measureless and supercilious contempt, with much affusion of vmsa- voury epithets is meted out to us by these gentlemen. We are ignorant, or cracked, or joking or paradoxical, — we are idiotic, characteristic-blind as certain persons are colour-blind, and "the tomfoolery of it is infinite.'' That is pretty fair for one " gentleman : " and he is the leader of the clan. Another member of this Hooligan type of critics writes thus to a friend in America, for publication in an American journal : — " Not a single adherent of any weight has joined the Baconian party here. A few persons who believe that we are the ten tribes, and that Arthur Orton was Sir Roger Tichborne, and that Tennyson's sister was the author of ' In Memoriam,' — people for whom evidence does not exist, and who love paradox for its own sake,— form the whole Baconian schism over here." This sweetly reasonable and gentle writer does not seem to concern himself with the truth or falsehood of these reck- less assertions. He gives the bastinado with his tongue ; Our ears are cudgellcfl. 4 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Other critics, again, adopt a tone of weariness, a 'don't bother ' sort of air ; they arc fatigued with these stupidities, they are so busy counting the weak and strong endings, the run-on hues, the central pauses, the rhymed couplets, the unstopped lines, and so forth, that they have no reserve of mental activity for our case. They can go into paroxysms of rapture over some hoax of a portrait, or some trumpery ring or wooden stool, which can by any process of straining evidence or torturing facts be associated with their fetish; but when the problem to be discussed is, the relation between "Shakespeare " and the greatest intellect that ever illuminated literature, himself a contemporary, living within an easy walk of the assumed author, likely to know all persons and all books worth knowing in his own country and time. — when this is the problem, our critics begin to yawn, and beg to be excused from taking interest in these unprofitable discussions. It really seems as if the sweet swan of Avon had by some Circcean witchcraft transformed his followers into geese. Dr. Hudson, one of the most capable of Shakespearean critics and biographers, dismisses the Baconian theory in the following summarj^ style : — "Upon this point I have just four things to say, — 1. Bacon's requital of the Earl's bounty [the Earl of Essex] was such a piece of ingratitude as I can hardly conceive the author of King Lear to have been guilt)^ of. 2. The author of Shakespeare's plays, whatever he may have been, certainly was not a scholar. He had indeed something vastly better than learning, but he had not that. 3. Shakespeare never philosophises. Bacon never does anything else. 4. Bacon's mind, great as it was, might have been cut out of Shakespeare's, without being missed" ("Shakespere : His Life, Art, and Character" by Rev. N. H. Hudson, LL.D., Vol. I. 269). This is not serious argument, and it would be simply a waste of time and words to discuss it. All these "four THE APOTHEOSIS OF PARADOX. 5 things " are either extremely debateable, or infinitely doubtful, or plainly inaccurate, or vaguely indefinite. Other critics seem to take a frisky delight in claiming for William Shakespere exactly what no one has ever found or can find in him, while others deny to the poet accomplish- ments which he Unquestionably possessed. Thus, one adventurous advocate of the Stratford claimant says : "Every careful student or critic is inevitably forced to the conclusion that the works must have been written either by Shakespera or by some'man whose education and experi- ence were likg,Ulis. His life is a key to much that would otherwise be perplexing in his writings ; " which is exactly the conclusion that no careful student or critic can possibly adopt, and which even good Shakespearean scholars, such as Charles Knight and Grant White, are forced to abandon. These extraordinary assertions are made by a writer who probably knows that the profoundest and most philosophi- cal Shakespearean critic who ever lived, Coleridge, in view of these same facts, is absolutely non-plussed by the anomalies suggested by what is known of William Shak- spere, and what we know must have been the character of the true author. "What," he exclaims, "are we to have miracles in Sport ? Does God choose idiots by whom to convey divine truths to man ? " While Emerson cannot marry the facts of Shakespeare's life to the verse ; and Hallam, nauseated by the unsavoury gossip and unclean rumours associated with Shakspere's name, despairing, yet with noble rage, calls for the Shakspeare that heaven made — not the one that earth supplies. I do not name these writers because I desire to avoid personal attack. And, after all, what have these critics to show in support of their singular contention that Shakespeare's poems are illuminated and illustrated by Shakspere's life? Absolutely nothing ! There is not a single passage in the poetry that becomes more interesting or more clear by reference to anything known about the Stratford playwright. Pro- 6 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. fessor Dowden has written a thoughtful and suggestive book on the "Mind and Art of Shakspere," showing the noble personal qualities that are dimly reflected in the plays. All he says is beautiful and interesting so long as William Shakspere is kept at a distance — so long as we follow Ben Jonson's sly suggestion and "look not on his picture, but his book." But as soon as the Warwickshire rustic is admitted, the dignity and vraiscviblance of the argument vanishes — the whole matter becomes, in Baconian language, "preposterous," grotesque, topsy- turvy. For instance, here is an eloquent and weighty passage — which it is a pleasure to transcribe: — "If Shakspere had died at the age of 40, it might have been said, ' the world has lost much, but the world's chief poet could not have created anything more wonderful than Hamlet.'' But after Hamlet came King Lear. Hamlet was in fact only the point of departure in Shakspere's immense and final sweep of mind — that in which he endeavoured to include and comprehend life for the first time adequately. Through Hamlet, perhaps also through events in the poet's personal history, which tested his will as Hamlet's was tested, Shakespere had been reached and touched by the shadow of some of the deep mysteries of human existence. Somehow a relation between his soul and the dark and terrible forces of the world was established, and to escape from a thorough mvestigation and sounding of the depths of life was no longer possible." True ! most true ! and if we go to Bacon's life to find out what were these stern facts which about the time that Lear was written, reached and touched his soul, and forced him to include and com- prehend the deepest mysteries of existence, we shall find the events which cast those deep shadows in the plays. For about this time — between 1600 and 1604 — the terrible tragedy of Essex's fall tested and tortured his spirit. For twent}^ years he had been a struggling disappointed man, his transcendant powers neglected or put to ignoble drudgery, forced to battle with sordid cares and envious PROF. DOWDEN S GLORIOUS GUESSES. 7 obstruction. He had lost his only brother Anthony, his second self, his "comfort," as he pathetically calls him, the one man in the whole world who understood and valued him aright. His mother, after years of mental and physical decay, had died, her splendid faculties having been long clouded and distorted by madness. His dearest hopes connected with that philosophic reformation which was nearest his heart seemed to be removed from their fruition by inaccessible distance ; his great nature fretted in solitude against the barriers and hmitations which seemed to baffle its most cherished aspirations. Here we see the agony and conflict which Professor Dowden so eloquently describes ; here is the cry of anguish which is echoed in Hamlet's strife with destiny, and in Lear's wild wail of unutterable pain. If Professor Dowden had been able to search in this direction for the original of the portrait which he draws of ''The Mind and Art of Shakespeare," how would his deepest speculations have been more than justified ! What new and profound and precious comments would he have made if he could have brought his glorious guesses into this historic environment ! It is almost shocking, it is inexpressibly humiliating, to see his attempts to establish a rapport for them with the vulgar, hollow mask of a life which is all that research can possibly find in the Stratford personality— a shrunken, sordid soul, fattening on beer and coin, and finding sweet- ness and content in the stercorariiim of his Stratford homestead. Professor Dowden does not apparently shrink from this desperate approximation, and here is the result : " Shakspere had by this time mastered the world from a practical point of view. He was a prosperous and wealthy man." That is all ! Here is the issue of these glorious guesses ; only this, and nothing more ! Oh, most lame and impotent conclusion ! " Sounding the depths of Hfe,** "including and comprehending" its hardest problems, means only filling his pockets with gold — "Mastering the world from a practical point of view," simply means 8 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACO>IIAN LIGHT. making his fortune and retiring to the inglorious obscurity of Stratford-on-Avon. He "somehow" encounters the dark and terrible forces of the world, and the result is seen in the bulging of his breeches pocket, and remunerative transactions in malt and money-lending. It is indeed difficult to understand how a thoughtful writer can endure such intellectual contortions, how he can willingly undergo the throes and agonies of parturient and mountainous thought, and then give birth to this feeble, and funny, and most ridiculous mouse. In advocating the Baconian authorship of Shakespeare, we are often confronted with the fact that for nearly three hundred years the reputed authorship was accepted with- out suspicion. In reference to this I may quote a remark made by Mr. Spedding respecting the paper called " Christian Paradoxes," which was attributed to Bacon by many learned Editors and Writers, and that without any dispute, for many years. When, however, capable critics seriously inspected it, they refused to accept the current opinion, and in 1864 Rev. Alexander Grosart discovered the true author — Herbert Palmer. Spedding's discussion of the case may be taken mutatis mutandis, as a very apt vindication of the Baconian argument, as one lawfully and reasonably raised. " I know " he says, " that in refusing it a place among his works I am opposing myself to the many eminent writers who have accepted it without suspicion as his. But it is the absence of suspicion that diminishes the value of their opinion. They have not explained away the difficulty; they have overlooked it." This is exactly our case. The so-called testimony in- volved in contemporary allusion, simply means absence of suspicion, — unconsciousness of difficulty. As soon as suspicion is aroused, it is absolutely impossible that it should ever again subside. (See Spedding's "Life of Bacon," vi. 129.) I have no intention of giving any exhaustive exposition of the Baconian case. Indeed that is practically im- UNTRODDEN FIELDS. 9 possible for any one. The student who seeks to define the relation that exists between Bacon's prose and Shake- speare's poetry enters on a quest which has no terminus. Every fresh reading in either group of writings brings out new points of comparison, new features of resemblance. My primary object is to show what a vast and neglected quarry of Shakespearean comment is to be found in Bacon's prose works, and to present some striking illustra- tions of these " Bakespeare " studies. If this is part of the Baconian polemic it is still more a contribution to Shake- speare study. I wish also to show that this educational field is much larger than has been hitherto supposed ; that Shakespearian poetry and Baconian philosophy are to be found in unsuspected localities — that our controversy is not a barren wrangle about names and persons, but a rich and fruitful excursion into the choicest plains of literature, a country worthy of investigation on its own account, and involving other issues than those of authorship, or patent rights in special literary property. Before, however, entering on these scattered studies, it may be well to exhibit some features of that prima facie case which is so strangely invisible to eminent Shakespeare scholars. Those who hold a brief for William Shake- speare, seem to me to hold in needless contempt such common-sense judgments as are easily apprehended by unlearned and non-critical readers. Indeed it seems to me that Carlyle's cynical estimate of the intellectual qualities of the human race is, in this case, far more applicable to learned critics than to the unlettered public. 10 CHAPTER II. PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE. The presumptive evidence belongs almost exclusively to the negative or Shakespearean side of the case. To prove a negative is proverbially difficult, consequently this it is which we are, as a rule, challenged to do. This also I think we can do ; but it must be by indirect, not direct, proof — it must come as an inference from the positive proofs of the other, the affirmative side of the case. These negative presumptive evidences, however, are very strong, and may be not unreasonably thought to comply with the cornering and unreasonable demand that the negative should be proved. I. — Shakespeare's Personal History. The m.ere enumeration of all that we know about William Shakspere, his family, his neighbours, his en- vironments, his actual pursuits, supplies a large instalment of this evidence, especially when what we do not know, but ought to know, if he was the man he is represented to be, is added to what we do know. William Shakspere when a boy certainly had no very considerable educational advantages. I do not mean in the matter of School Education ; there is no positive proof that he had any. But he was not surrounded by culti- vated people. John Shakspere, his father, signed his name by a mark. So did most of the aldermen and burgesses of the town. So did Shakspere's daughter, Judith, when she married, in 1616. It is not antecedently THE EVOLUTION OF WILLIAM SHAKSPERE. II probable that Shakspere was better educated than his father and the leading men of his town. He n:iarried — with needful and discreditable haste — when he was i8. Before he was 21 he had a family — three children and a wife, — and his father's broken-down household to look after, and more or less to support : and about this time he was apparently compelled to leave Stratford, his youthful frolics having brought him into trouble. This must have been the time when the true Shakespeare was studying diligently, and filling his mind with those vast stores of learning, — classic, historic, legal, scientific,— which bore such splendid fruit in his after life. The needy, struggling youth came to London about 1585, and no distinct traces of him are to be found till 1592. By that time he had become a fairly prosperous theatre manager. This was very creditable to him : he must have been a hardworking man of business ; but it is not easy to imagine that he could have been also an unremitting student. There is something incompatible between the gifts which are required for commercial success, especially in young manhood, and those which achieve eminence in poetry and literature. The blank in Shakspere's life, which no research can fill up, occurs exactly where we might expect it to be. When a man is burrowing painfully from the depths of poverty and obscurity, trying perhaps to redeem his youthful faults and recover from the misfortunes they have brought, striving to reach the sunshine of opulence and \v0rldl3' success, he is of necessity hidden from public view. He becomes visible when the process is completed. And by the nature of the result one may pretty safely infer the character of the toil he has undergone. If a needy, and probably deserving vagabond dives into the abyss of London life, lies perdu for a few years, and then emerges as a tolerably wealthy theatrical manager, you know that he must have gained some mastery of theatre business, — he must have made himself a useful man in the green room, a skilful 12 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. organiser of players and stage effects, — he must have found out how to govern a troop of actors, reconcihng their rival egotisms and utilising their special gifts ; how to cater for a capricious public, and provide attractive entertainments. He would have little time for other pursuits — if a student at all his studies would be very practical, relating to matters of present and pressing interest. During this dark period he has been carving his own fortune, filling his pockets, not his mind ; working for the present, not for the future. But it was exactly then that the plays began to appear. Some critics have even supposed that the twin plays, 2 and 3 Henry VI., saw the light about the same time as Shakspere's twins were born. Most confidently I submit that this personal history is not what might be expected of Shakespeare. I need not recapitulate here all the known facts about William Shakspere. I will only say that not the remotest trace of any connexion between him and learning can be found. His known occupations, apart from theatre business, were money lending, malt dealing, transactions in house and land property. He retired from the stage, and settled- again in Stratford, about the year 1603 — not seeking the society of cultivated persons, not choosing for his home any locality where books could be obtained to help him in the composition of the yet unwritten plays. His Will makes no reference to literary property, and no provision for the publication of the plays which first appeared seven years after his death. All that can be ascertained about William Shakspere leaves the biography of the poet of Shakespeare still unwritten, and does not supply one shred of explanation of the genesis of the plays. The whole matter may be summed up in the eloquent words of Mr. Allanson Picton : — " A biography of Shake- speare, in any proper sense of the word is not only difficult ; it is impossible. For the development of his character, the dawn of his powers, the pre- determining causes involved in genealogy, the influence of schools and SHAKSPERE BIOGRAPHY IMPOSSIBLE. I3 schoolmasters, of relatives, friends and social surround- ings, are in this case almost entirely irrecoverable. He flashes suddenly upon us like the sun in the tropics, blaz- ing with a light which drowns every feeling but one of dazzled admiration. And he sinks as suddenly into the blank night of death, with scarcely a trace of those private interests, personal conflicts, struggles with temptation, or domestic trials, which, like flying clouds, temper the glow, and lend a tenderness to the departure of the day in its more familiar course. This ignorance of all detail in the origin and shaping of our transcendent poet, makes us often contemplate him with the sort of unsatisfied longing that affects us in view of a portent of which neither science nor philosophy can give any account.''' Both what is known about William Shakspere, and what is not known, supply the prima facie evidence against the claim made for him which eminent Shakespeare students profess themselves unable to discover. 2. — Greene's "Groatsworth of Wit." It will be found that the contemporary allusions to Shakespeare — not excepting Ben Jonson's poem prefixed to the folio of 1623, have no bearing on the question of authorship. If any of them shew that the writer of the allusion supposed the Stratford townsman to be the author of Shakespeare, I do not care to dispute the fact. The question still remains — what ground, beyond rumour and title pages, had they for this opinion ? and did they take any interest in the personal question at all ? I do not in- tend to retrace the oft-trodden ground which Chettle and his contemporaries occupy. These matters have been sufficiently discussed by Mr. Appleton Morgan (" Shake- speare Myth "), Nathaniel Holmes (" The Authorship of Shakespeare"), and above all by Mr. Donnelly in the admirable exposition of the entire subject which forms the first volume of his, in other respects most unsatisfactory, book, "The Great Cryptogram." But there is one refer- 14 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. ence on which a few words may be given, because I can- not help thinking it has been completely misunderstood. All readers of Shakespeare's biography are familiar with the allusion to Shakespeare supposed to be contained in Robert Greene's pamphlet, — "A Groatsworth of Wit pur- chased with a Million of Repentance," The writer seems to be very angry with some one who has by false pretences secured a prize which legitimate dramatic authors and playwrights, belonging officially to the author's craft, have been unable to secure. The successful man is " an upstart crow, beautified with our feathers, that with his Tiger's heart wrapt in a player's hyde supposes he is as well able to bombast out a blanke verse as the best of you, and being an absolute Johannes Factotum is, in his owne conceit, the only Shake-Scene in a countrie." This was published in 1596, — but entered at Stationer's Hall in September 1592, and probably published for the first time in that year. Now whatever interpretation we may give to these cryptic words, I do not think we can gather from them that the "upstart crow " was an author, but only an actor, who pretended to be an author also. For being only a handy man at the theatre he is not one of the writers' class, and has no right to profess himself an author. He is wearing feathers which do not rightfully belong to him, and pre- tending to be what he really was not. He is not a dramatist, but onh' a spouter. All this is consistent with the idea that Shakspere, if he is intended, was not the writer of the plays which were attributed to him, and thus the question not only remains open, it is actually started, and a clear place is left for the Baconian or any other hypothesis. But is the allusion to Shakspere at all ? I very much doubt it. In 1592 "Shakespeare" did not exist in literature at all, and only two or three of the plays which subsequently appeared under this name could have been written. It is difficult to understand how any sore- ness could have been occasioned in Greene's mind by William Shakspere's success at that time, such as it was, • either as an author or an actor. POETRY, NOT HISTORY. 15 And I do not find in the word Shake-scene any necessary reference to Shakspere. Thie word probably only points sarcastically to some pompous and ostentatious player who treads heavily on the boards, shaking the stage with his footsteps and the house with his thunder. This same self-asseiting personage is admirably described by the poet : — And with ridiculous and awkward action, Which, — slanderer ! — he imitation calls. He pageants us. Sometime, great Agamemnon, Th}' topless deputation he puts on, And, like a strutting player whose conceit Lies in his hamstring, and doth think it rich To hear the wooden dialogue and sound 'Twixt his stretched footing and the scaffoldage, — Such to-be-pitied and o'er wrested seeming He acts thy greatness in : and when he speaks 'Tis like a chime a-mending ; with terms unsquared, Which from the tongue of roaring Typhon dropped, Would seem hyperboles : — At this fusty stuff Achilles Laughs out a loud applause. (Tro. Cr. i. iii. 149), Unfortunately very few persons read Greene's tract in extenso ; the allusion extracts are all they know. If, how- ever, any reader will trouble himself to read the whole, with fresh and unpreoccupied mind, I am inclined to think he will very seriously doubt whether it is an outcome of Greene's personal history in any sense. It reads like a sort of poetical romance, fanciful and absolutely unhistoric. Any one might pass over this allusion passage, as it occurs in the book, without detecting anything auto- biographic. It might even have been written by the Shakes- pearean poet himself to draw attention to his then unknown and unnoticed plays. The use ordinarily made of it is, to say the least, one of very doubtful validity, and if any allusion is secreted in it, the interpretation is quite natural which supposes that the real author is concealed, and that some unscrupulous player profits by the oppor- l6 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. tunitv of anonymous authorship, and takes the credit to himself. 3. — Probabilities. If WiUiam Shakspere was the monarch of Parnassus, the greatest philosophic poet and dramatist the world has ever seen, some traces of this pre-eminence might be expected to survive in history. He did not live in pre- historic times, nor in the midst of social anarchy and revolution in which the marks of individual greatness might be extinguished. His contemporaries are fairly well known, and he could not have been less noticed than Ben Jonson, or Raleigh. Such a mighty man might be expected to leave behind him some such traces as the following : — 1. Some direct documentary evidence of authorship- some manuscript, or letters, something which an auto- graph hunter would eagerly take possession of and carefully preserve. 2. Some genuine personal allusions, not relating to or arising out of his poetry, but proper to himself, — some tradition of weighty conversation, or wise letters, — some literar}' scraps dropped in conversation or correspondence. 3. Some traces of other literary work, or serious occupa- tion, besides the poems. 4. Some traces of a great and imposing personality, who would honour any society by his presence, — some record of his ability to leave a personal impression on his con- temporaries answering to and commensurate with the literary impression which he has left upon the world, 5. Some evidence that he was attracted by those things which interest cultivated men, — books, libraries, in- tellectual society, correspondence with men of kindred tastes and accomplishments, — something to connect him with the science, or studies of the time. 6. Some relics of his library, — books which he valued or LACUNA. 17 presented to his friends, which they would preserve as heir-looms and memorials of the greatest man they ever knew. The only book that has ever been supposed to belong to him is a copy of Florio's "Montaigne," now in the British Museum. But unfortunately the signature in this book is supposed by capable judges to have been forged. 7. Some traditions pointing to his connexion with public life, with which his writings shew him to have been remarkably familiar, — some account of his studies in ancient and modern history and classic literature, — some proofs of foreign travel, especially in Italy and France, — something to account for his exceptional acquaintance with courts, kings and upper-class society — something to explain his distaste for the lower and middle classes and his patrician scorn for the common people. 8. Some indications that he valued learning for its own sake and was ready to diffuse it, by giving his own children a good education, and by promoting intellectual pursuits in Stratford when he retired from business and took up his residence there, a wealthy and unoccupied man. I say some such lights as these might be expected to pierce through the gloom tl#at surrounds the man. I do not claim that all these characteristic marks of greatness should be visible, but some of them should, — and we are entitled to ask why it is that none of these questions are ever raised in the critical accounts of Shakspere. We have plenty of details of what he must have been, and conse- quently purely fanciful pictures of what he was, for which not a shred of historic basis can be found. In further pursuit of this line of enquiry we may notice two or three characteristics which the true Shakespeare certainly possessed, and which William Shakspere almost as certainly did not possess. l8 shakespeare studies in baconian light. 4. — The Lawyer. Several books have been written in illustration of Shakespeare's legal accomplishments, the most celebrated though not the best, being that by Lord Campbell. This knowledge, — all the lawyers admit, — was not the babble of an amateur, coached up for special occasions. He does not sport his little legal lore like a smatterer, loading par- ticular plays or scenes with it, and then dropping it till the next law business is required — it is always ready — it is not reserved for dramatic situations involving legal points, but it turns up unexpectedly, for allusion, or decoration or simple expression of a vivid and pointed character. When it is the ruling idea it is presented with a daring affluence and freedom which no amateur could venture to attempt. I do not think any one but a trained lawyer could have written Sonnet 87. Only a lawyer can expound its technicalities or say what branch of legal science is em- ployed, or what statutory principles are intended. And yet it is intelligible to the most unprofessional reader. The law learning is so profound and yet so well digested, that it blends with all other learning and can be used in illustration of anything. Here it is : — Farewell ! Thou art too dear for my possessing, And like enough thou know'st thy estimate : The charter of thy worth gives thee releasing ; My bonds in thee are all determinate. For how do I hold thee but by thy granting ? And for lliat riches where is my deserving ? The cause of this fair gift in me is wanting, And so my patent back again is swerving. Thyself thou gav'st, thy own worth then not knowing, Or me, to whom thou gav'st it, else mistaking ; So thy great gift, upon misprison growing, Comes home again on better judgment making. Thus have I held thee, as a dream dotli Hatter, In sleep a king, but waking no such matter. Sonnet 46, is almost as legal, and could (or would) scarcely have been written by an amateur. THE LEGAL EXPERT. I9 All the law critics admit that such language as this is not the writing of an amateur but of an expert, and this is Lord Campbell's conclusion. "There is nothing so dangerous," says Lord Campbell, "as for one not of the craft to tamper with our freemasonry," and he gives illus- trations of the blunders made by educated men trying to talk law-shop when they have not the necessary training or experience. The outsider is sure, sooner or later to be found out. He will traverse what he approves, — or empanel a witness instead of a jury, — or in some way his legal chatter will degenerate into jargon. But Shakespeare never stumbles — he is never caught tripping, — the most erudite lawyer can find nothing in his language that he can take exception to. Consequently, Lord Campbell comes to the positive conclusion that he must have spent some time in the study or practice of law. "If the only possible way for William Shakspere to have gained his legal knowledge was his employment as an attorney's clerk at Stratford-on-Avon, well then, Attorney's clerk he certainly was,- -it must be taken as proved." Lord Campbell how- ever, adds that there is not a particle of proof that he ever was so employed, and that such proof would almost certainly exist in the form of signatures, attestations or documents in his handwriting. Perhaps if Lord Campbell had written after instead of before the Baconian con- troversy arose, he would have hesitated before making such very compromising statements, which do, indeed, contain or imply all the premises of a syllogistic argument to prove that the man, William Shakspere, was not the author of this law-talk at all. Lawyers say that one of the most difficult things to acquire in their profession is the phraseology. Law students are repelled by its uncouth and strange pecu- liarities, — its cumbrous and pedantic formality, its stiff grotesque forms, its apparent redundancy and circumlo- cution. They not only cannot accustom themselves to it, they cannot endure it, they often hate it, — its 20 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. language refuses to settle on their tongue. It takes years of study and practice to overcome this repug- nance. For a man to make this uncouth diction his own, — to use it playfully, allusively, metaphorically, poetically, — to wear it as a well-fitting garment to which his own limbs and movements have become adjusted, is the rarest possible achievement, and even for a good lawyer may be impossible. Yet this is what we find in Shakespeare, He "talks shop" so well that we forget that it is shop ; it gathers grace, dignity, flexibility and beauty as he incorporates it with the magic and the mystery and the opulence of his own incomparable style. If William Shakspere was a lawyer surely he would have drafted his own will, and put into it some traces of his own personality. But there is no indication of this. The individuality of the testator never peeps through the impersonal and featureless style ot the local scrivener, — who, apparently, expected the testator to sign his name by a mark, — by his seal, not his hand, — as if the draftsman knew, what many experts in caligraphy suppose, that he could not write. It must be observed, that the proof that the writer was a lawyer has a different rank from the proofs that he was a doctor, a divine, a navigator, &c. The masonic sign is recognised by the initiated. Mr. Furnivall, a barrister himself, says, "That he was [an attorney's clerk] at one time of his life I, as a lawyer, have no doubt. Shakspere's knowledge of insanity was not got in a doctor's shop ; though his law was, I believe, in a lawyer's office." It is only non-professional critics who suppose that this legal experience might have been picked up by hanging about the courts, or by his own experience in litigation. And this explanation is as difficult as Lord Campbell's unsolved enigma. 5. — The Aristocrat. The writer of Shakspere had the culture and tastes of a statesman and an aristocrat. Hartley Coleridge said he A TORY AND A GENTLEMAN. 21 was "A Tory and a gentleman." The plays with one exception, viz., the Merry Wives, do not deal with middle class life at all. Men and women of all classes of life are introduced, but the leading characters, the scenes, situa- tion, events, interests and actions, belong to the life of princes, nobles, statesmen, men of the upper classes. If the life is rural, it is not that of peasants — the court moves into the country, and the point of view is that of an aristocrat looking on at peasant life (as in As Yovi, Like It), not of a provincial townsman or peasant reporting his own experiences. The virtuous peasant is represented by two servants, Adam in As You Like It, and Flavins, the steward of Timon — and these are humble retainers of aristocratic masters, rustic parasites sucking virtue out of an aristocratic organism. Thus the exceptions not only prove the rule, they emphasize and accentuate it. Not only so, we can see peeping from beneath the dramatic mask, a fine patrician contempt for the common people. Without any too adventurous interlinear read- ings, one can see that the writer's sympathies are not with Jack Cade, nor even with Joan of Arc, nor with the popular tribunes, or the mob or crowd of common people in the historic and classic plays, but rather with — Lord Say, Julius Caesar and Coriolanus. The phrase from Horace, Belhta multorum cs capituni, is very frequently reflected in the plays. The blunt monster with uncounted heads The still-discordant, wavering multitude. (2 Hen. IV. Indue, i8) and the wavering instability of the people is never forgotten. Was ever feather so lightly blown to and fro as this multitude ? (2 Hen. VI. IV., viii. 57.) Bacon says of the people that "they ever love to run from one extreme to another." (" Life," L, loo.) This mobility is excellently pictured in the scene from 2 He7t. VI. When Cade addresses them, all exclaim, "We'll 22 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. follow Cade, we'll follow Cade." Clifford addresses then-> immediately afterwards, and they exclaim, "A Clifford! A Clifford ! we'll follow the King and Clifford." Shakespeare speaks of " the fool multitude " {Mcr. Ven. II. ix. 26), anticipating Carlyle's famous jibe, "mostly fools." Bacon's language is much the same : — " Your Lordships see what monstrous opinions these are, and how both these beasts, the beast with seven heads, and the beast with many heads, — pope and people, — are at once let in." {Talbot, Charge. "Life," V. 10.) " A thing acceptable to the people, who ever love to run from one extreme to another." (" Life," I. 100.) "Multitudes, which can never keep within the compass of any moderation." (Pacif. of Ch. III. 107.) Bacon also speaks of the people as fools : and no fiercer invective against the "vulgar heart" of the multitude, — the "beastly feeder" that disgorges to-day what it swallowed greedily yesterday, — was ever penned, than that which Shakespeare puts into the mouth of the Archbishop of York. (See 2 Hen. IV. I., iii., 87—108.) "The master of superstition is the people; and in all superstitions wise men follow fools." (Essay of "Super- stition.") " There is a superstition in avoiding superstition, when men think to do best if they go farthest from the super- stition formerly received. Therefore care would be had that, — as it fareth in ill purgings, — the good be not taken away with the bad, which commonly is done when the people is the reformer." (lb.) "Praise . . . if it be from the common people, is commonly false and naught, and rather followeth vain persons than virtuous : for the common people understand not many excellent virtues." (Essay of " Praise.") "Common people have praise for the lowest virtues, admiration for the middle, but for the highest, no sense at all." (Antitheta on "Praise,") NO COUNTRY LIFE IN SHAKESPEARE. 23 Professor Dowden admits that Shakespeare "had within him some of the elements of English Conservatism." And it has been a matter of reproach that he has so little sympathy with those of his own class, whose good repute ought to have been precious to him. Mrs. Pott, in her pamphlet, "Did Francis Bacon write Shakespeare?" remarks on the very notable absence of events, scenes and interests belonging to rural life. There is no village green with rustic dances, no may-pole, no country inn, no fair, no market, no har^'est home, no haymaking, no Christmas games, none of the small pleasures and allurements of county or country-town life. There is no brewing, cider making, fruit gathering, hop picking, reaping, gleaning, threshing, no farm house, no scene in a country gentle- man's house. If Falstaff visits Justice Shallow and interviews the rustics, it is for political purposes, for conscription ; and the excuses of the unhappy peasants to obtain exemption from military service are matters for ridicule and laughter. If rustic service or occupations are introduced it is by allusion — as in Troilus and Crcssida, the processes of baking are referred to, — they are never matters of primary interest. The plays are exactly what might be expected from a courtier and a scholar, with a liberal education and familiarity with the upper ten thousand. If a rustic wrote them, his emancipation from rustic ideas is one miracle, and his knowledge of upper class life another. It need scarcely be remarked that such absolute want of sympathy with the common people could not possibly have been expressed by a man of low, if not peasant rank, who all his life belonged to a class which was treated as com- posed of vagabonds and outcasts. For William Shake- speare to have thus written would stamp him as an ill bird, fouhng his own nest,— a true son of Ham exposing his own father's nakedness. 24 shakespeare studies in baconian light. 3, — The Classical Scholar. The writer was a classical scholar. Critics say that the classic learning was derived from translations or general reading. It is difficult to understand how this can be with reference to classic authors who were then untranslated. And it is still more difficult to understand how such a profound knowledge of classic history and mythology as is shewn, not only in the classic plays, but in those which did not require such embellishment, can have been acquired without going to the original sources. Drake or Captain Cook did not learn navigation by towing a ferry or such small "translation" as this : Captain Webb did not learn to swim the Channel by paddling in a brook : and it is equally improbable that Shakespeare could sail so easily in these large oceans of classic lore without scholarly preparation. As this, however, will be separately discussed I need not enlarge upon it here. 4. — Various Accomplishments. The writer was apparently well versed in French ; he writes very good conversational French. He very often uses French words either as such, or Anglicised. The following are specimens of his French : some of the words which are now fully naturalized were in his time more or less strangers: — Accoutrement, advertise (avertir), aidant, aigre (or eager for the same French word), allegiant, amort, appellants, bawcock (beaucoq), benison, bruit, blazon, buttons (for boutons), cap-a-pe, coigne, debonnair, deracinate, egal, esperance, foison, guerdon (or re-guerdon), legerity, matin, mot, moiety, montant, oelhards, orguellous, orisons, parle, point-device, puissance, puissant, rendezvous, rigol, rivage, sans, semblable. Also such phrases as, to utterance (a outrance) in happy time (a la bonne heure). Shakespeare puts a good deal of French into Henry V., Shakespeare's travels. 25 and with reference to one quotation which he makes from the New Testament — viz., " Le chien est retourne a son propre vomissement et la truie lavee au bourbier " {Henry V. III. vii. 68)— Mr, Hudson thus comments : — "It has been remarked that Shakespeare was habitually conversant with his Bible; we have here a strong pre- sumptive proof that he read it, at least occasionally, in French. This passage will be found, almost literally, in the Geneva Bible of 1588. (2 Pet. ii. 22)." Indications of familiarity with Spanish and Italian are not wanting, but are less decisive. The writer had most probably travelled in France and Italy, as we know Bacon did in his early youth. Professor Elze goes far to prove that Shakespeare had visited Mantua, and seen the tomb of Julio Romano. There is a reference to this artist in the Winter's Tale, as a sculptor, not agreeing with what was then currently known about him, for he is generally spoken of as a painter. But the description given of him exactly and minutely corresponds to that given in his epitaph- at Mantua; and Professor Hales thinks that by this observation Professor Elze has "certainly increased the probability of Italian travels," which other critics have supposed, especially from the topographical and other knowledge, accurate and detailed, shown in the Merchant of Venice, the Comedy of Errors, and Othello. The supposition that all these accomplishments can have been possessed by William Shakspere seems to me audacious or desperate in the extremest degree. Critics, however, can venture on extravagant speculations to fill up the lacunas in their biographies of the author of "Shakespeare," which in any other setting would be at once scouted as impossible. One of the boldest and most amusing of these speculations is contained in Mr. Neild's Edition of Romeo and Juliet. In this play, and in Hamlet, the editor finds unmistakable traces of the influence of Giordano Bruno; and as there is some evidence that the 26 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. [talian Philosopher was a guest of Sir Fulke Greville at Warwick Castle some time in the years 1583 — 1585, Mr. Xeild finds in that visit the explanation of the Bruno traces in these plays. " What if the philosophic poet [i.e., Greville] felt an early sympathy with the young singer of Avon, and brought the most wonderful Italian thinker of the age into living connection with the most pregnant of the wits of England, by an invitation to Warwick Castle given to William Shakespere while Bruno was there as a guest, for Greville was the possessor of Warwick Castle, and Member of Parliament for Warwickshire along with Sir Thomas Lucy, and was a very frequent visitor at Stratford-on-Avon." This seems to me one of the boldest anachronisms in literature. Who could possibly know anything about William Shakspere's "pregnant wit" in 1583 or 1585 ? If Greville had ever heard of him from Sir T. Lucy, he probably knew of him as a wild youth who had stolen his deer, and was deservedly punished for his riotous gambols. The fact that such cobweb theories as this must be constructed if any intelligible account of William Shakespere as the supreme poet can be given, supplies the strongest prima facie evidence against his supposed authorship. I need not refer to other accomplishments in science and Biblical learning which were possessed by Shakespeare. I will only remark that even if part of this learning might be somehow picked up by an unlettered peasant, yet the entire sum of it, the full-orbed completeness with which he had mastered all the learning of his time, and " taken all knowledge into his province," cannot easily be con- nected with what we know of William Shakspere. This cannot be assumed, it must be proved, and it is quite certain that the materials for such proof do not exist. 5. — Shakspere Biography. Let it be noted that nearly all the current biographies of Shakspere are filled with surmises, speculations, guesses CONJECTURAL BIOGRAPHY. 27 and more or less baseless assertions. The one work of this class in which these features are absent is Halliwell Phillipps's "Outlines," and as this most excellent work contains only well-established facts, resting on historic and documentary evidence, it is quite impossible to find in it the author of Lear or Hamlet. We find only William Shaxpur of Stratford-on-Avon, and accordingly Baconians may claim this book as one of the strongest outside buttresses of the Baconian theor}'. The speculations to which I refer are, of course, such as are required by the unchallenged assumption that W^illiam Shakspere really wrote the poems attributed to Shakespeare. As soon as this is disputed, the biographies are starved of their best material, and become, as Bacon says, "poor shrunken things, full of melancholy and indisposition, and un- pleasing to themselves " (Essay of "Truth "). It is quite a pleasant little comedy to watch the variety and multitude of these guessing phrases, the costume and property of the dramatic fictions called " Life of Shakspere." I may be allowed here to reproduce some remarks bearing on this subject from the " Bacon Journal," II. go, in a review of Mrs. Stopes' book on "The Bacon-Shakespeare Question: " — "Mrs. Stopes' eloquent and original account of William Shakspere's life does great credit to her powers of imagination and invention. It is a pleasant little fable, the construction of which must have been attended with much poetic rapture. The whole of this charming piece of fiction is freely sprinkled over with the guessing formulae which are so amply used by these romancists, such as : ' would doubtless ' — ' must have learned ' — ' no doubt he often ' — ' perhaps he would ' — * my own opinion is ' — ' he certainl}^ felt' — 'it is more than likely' — ' they would see' — 'just think how' — *I think' — 'probably he became.' These phrases, some of them repeated more than once, crowd the pages. This is all very amusing, but as for the history or logic of the case they are conspicuously absent. The muse of History returns to the nursery, where she dresses up a doll and puts on grandmamma's spectacles." 28 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Exactly the same account may be fj^lven of the learned but in some respects unsatisfactory book which Mr. Sidney Lee facetiously calls "The Life of Shakespere." Mr. George Stronach in a review of Mr. Sidney Lee's book (" Baconiana," April, i8gg) produces between eighty and ninety such phrases as Mrs. Stopes uses so freely, picked out at haphazard from this remarkable biography. It really is not a life of Shakspere at all, but a very learned and valuable catalogue raisonnec of certain literary creations passing under Shakespeare's name, with incidental and quite unnecessary references to one Mr. Shakspere. All that is said about William Shakspere might be left out, and the value of the work rather increased than diminished. Here also little Clio re-enters the nursery aiid tries to talk like her mother, Mnemosyne, whose spectacles she has stolen; but instead of Memory of Facts, we have Invention of Fancies. Mr. Lee's usual formula for uncertain state- ments is ^' doicbiless," which may, of course, mean as much doubt and as little certainty as anyone chooses to admit. Sometimes sheer inventions are stated without the use of any conjecturing phrase, with as much and as positive an assurance as if they were capable of historic verification. For instance, Mr. S. Lee published in the Comhill Maga- zine for April, 1899, a paper on the Shakespeare Folio of 1623, which may be taken as a rider to his book. In this paper he says : "The copy for the press, the manu- scripts of the pla5^s, the publishers obtained from the managers of the acting corhpany with whom Shakspere was long connected as both author and actor." What historic or even moral justification Mr. S. Lee can find for this manner of writing history I must leave to his own personal responsibilit}', for I am at a loss to conjecture. The only possible authority for this statement is contained in the Cryptic Address to the reader, and the Dedication to Pembroke and Montgomery, prefixed to the 1623 Folio. The Dedication simply says, " We have but collected them." The Address says they "have collected and FICTION yOT FOUNDED ON FACT. 29 published them . . . absolute in their numbers, as he con- ceived them." These words certainly do not contain any of the detail which Mr, S. Lee thinks proper to state as if it were well-ascertained fact. There is nothing to enable us to determine whether the " collecting " was made by hunting in the theatres, or turning over the poet's own papers and searching his pigeon-holes. Now, inasmuch as the whole of the introductory matter prefixed to the 1623 Folio is matter for keen debate, since the Cambridge editors and others find so much suggestio falsi as to deprive all its unproved assertions of any authority, as no one knows whether the professed editors (who were, of course, genuine persons) were men of straw, or responsible editors; and as the whole prefatory matter, including Ben Jonson's poem, may be as much a dramatic performance or "Induction" as that prefixed to the Taming of the Shrew, Mr. S. Lee's detailed statement, explaining the sources of the Folio, may be considered as somewhat hazardous. And Shakspere biography, if it is to be com- plete, if its distressing lacunse are to be filled up or bridged over, so as to bring it into relation with the Renaissance Drama, must be buttressed and supplemented by such guesses and fictions as Mr. S. Lee and the rest of them substitute for facts. Under these circumstances it might be supposed that the poet's biography must be recon- structed, perhaps even transferred to another personality. Assuredly this hypothesis is not unreasonable. I have said that the most trustworthy life of William Shakspere is that by Halliwell Phillipps. x^nd what sort of personality does he produce ? We see a rustic peasant, a country townsman, born and bred in a "bookless neigh- bourhood," among utterly uneducated people. The youth is not destitute of some qualities that make for advance- ment in life. If no good, yet not much harm is known of him, if the circumstances connected with his over hasty and early marriage are neglected. After a somewhat stormy youth he forsakes his native town, when a very 30 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. young man, in order to push his fortunes in London. He succeeds beyond his expectations, becomes rich on the gains of theatrical management, and after some years returns to the town where his family had continued to reside, and spends the rest of his days in commercial and money-lending transactions, which, if fairly respectable, were not very noble, never sparing any defaulting creditor, but pursuing him with the utmost rigour of the law. His speculations seem to have been generally fortunate, he becomes a land-owner and lives in a fine house which he has purchased. And this is all ! Not a trace of such occupations as those in w^hich the author of Shakespeare might be supposed to be most interested, no mention of books or studies, or any literary property, not even in his will; not a scrap of his writing preserved except five or six shockingly written signatures, variously spelt, nothing to show literary education, or acquired learnin>T or literary performance. As to the works which we now call Shakespeare they are leagues away from the subject of Mr. Halliwell Phillipps' biography, and not a single significant or really valuable commentary on any one passage in them is to be derived from anything we positively know concerning the man to whom they are traditionally attributed. The paradox and anomaly of all this is so infinite that even highly orthodox Shakespeareans are obliged some- times to admit as much, and, as to the detachment of the Shakespeare drama from all that relates to the man, no one has exposed it with more cynical frankness than Richard Grant ^^'hite, who bore the proud title of " Shakespeare's Scholar." The chapter on Stratford-on-Avon, in his book "England Within and Without," concludes with these remarkable words : "Thus ended my visit to Stratford-on- Avon, where I advise no one to go who would preserve any elevated idea connected with Shakespeare's person- ality. There is little there to interest and much to dishearten a 'passionate pilgrim' to the scenes of the A DESECRATED SHEKINAH. 3I earlier and later life of him who is the great glory of our literature. ... As I drove out of the town, on my way to Kenilworth .... the last object which caught my eye was a large sign over a little shop, William Shakespeare, Shoemaker. A fitting close, I thought, of my pilgrimage. It would have annoyed the 'gentleman born ' much more than it annoyed me, and for quite another reason. The only place in England which he who is sometimes honoured with the name of ' Shakespeare's Scholar ' regrets having visited, is that where Shakespeare was born and buried." And these words were written by the man who cannot find terms of insult too gross to hurl at those who, when they wish to visit the ancient haunts of the Shakespeare poet, do not go to Stratford-on-Avon, but to Gorhambury and St. Albans. In conclusion, let me add that the two book?, which supply the most powerful arguments for the negative side of our case — the anti-Shakspere side — are, Halli- well Phillipps' "Outlines," and Ingleby's "Century of Praise." Of Dr. Ingleby's "Collection of Allusions," extending over a hundred years, I may confidently assert that it does not contain one single testimony to authorship which need give the least tremor to Baconians. Not one of these allusions complies with the conditions defined in the second number of our list of Probabilities, see p. ib. This is, of course, of no importance to Baconians ; it is exactly what they are prepared for. The real perplexity is for Shakespeareans. Where, they may ask, is Mr. William Shakspere, of Stratford-on-Avon, in this crowded catalogue of allusions ? Where is he ? And echo answers — Where? 32 CHAPTER III. FRANCIS BACOX. I.— The Scholar and Man of the World. That Francis Bacon wrote Shakespeare, I have no more doubt than that he wrote the Novum Organmn. Wilham Shaxpur is impossible, and as he retreats, enter the noble and majestic form of Francis Bacon ! No one else can be seriously suggested as the author : if the Stratford towns- man is dethroned, Bacon immediately steps into the vacant place. He alone is known to have had all the knowledge shewn in the poetry. Nearly all that was knowable in his time, he knew. His mind was well stored with classic lore. It may sound paradoxical, yet it is true, that one very significant indication of this is his constant habit of inaccurate quotation. He does not seem to have made a practice of looking up passages in the original : he quotes from memory, and although he always gives either the true sense or an improvement upon it, yet he very often does not give the ipsissima verba ; and this habit of inaccurate quotation is, I think, the mark of a scholar retaining ideas but not always reproducing precise words. One or two specimens will suffice ; scores may be found in Reynolds' edition of the "Essays." In the Essay of "Adversity," Bacon quotes Seneca in this form : "Vere magnum habere fragilitatem hominis, securitatem Dei." The exact words, as Mr. Reynolds points out, are, " Ecce res magna, habere imbccillitatem hominis securitatem Dei." In the Essay of "Seditions and Troubles," Tacitus is thus quoted : " Conflata magna invidia, sen bene, sen male gesta bacon's versatility. ^^ Premunt." The words are, " Inviso semel principe, sen bene sen male facta prcmuni" This verbal inaccuracy must be remembered when the small errors in fact or allusion of Shakespeare are referred to as proof of deficient scholarship and as impossible for Bacon. Such mistakes are not only no argument against the Baconian theory, they are consistent with it, and even help to sustain it. There is not, I believe, a single hint of knowledge con- tained in the plays which may not be illustrated by reference to Bacon's acknowledged works. And the gifts of fancy, imagination, wit, genius are his in rich abundance. Every page of his writings sparkles with gems of fancy. He could not write a letter on the dryest subject without some gleam of poetic embellishment. His was a royal mastery of language never surpassed, never perhaps equalled, such a mastery as we see in Shakespeare and no where else. He was the most accomplished lawyer of his age, not excepting even Lord Coke ; not willingly, — for he would have preferred to devote himself to other pursuits, — but, as he was obliged to live by his profession, so, by slow, gradual advancement, by sheer force of merit, he won his way to its very summit, and acquired that command of legal science and phraseology which is so marked a feature of the plays. He was a courtier, and a statesman, the son of a Lord Chancellor, nearly related to or closely intimate with the most eminent men in the kingdom ; a constant associate with royal and aristocratic persons. His native region was the Court of princes and the halls of noble?. He was skilled in foreign languages, French, Spanish and Italian ; had lived in France and travelled in the South of Europe in his early youth, and knew by his own e3'esight, and by his own marvellous gifts of perception, the Italian scenes and skies which are so well described in the early plays. Several letters, written by Bacon in French, are published in Spedding's life. D 34 shakespeare studies in baconian light. 2. — The Poet, He was a poet. Nearly all the critics agree in this, however much they may otherwise differ. The quick perception of analogies, the habit of reading spiritual laws in (and into) historic facts and natural phenomena, the irresistible poetic bias which induced him to enshrine the fanciful conceits of his Philosophia Prima into the very highest place, the very citadel of his Philosophy, all these were supremely characteristic of his mind. He was, like Shakespeare, primarily a philosopher, a moralist, and he uses his powers of invention, his imagination and fancy and eloquence, in order that he may discourse more effectively on matters pertaining to the conduct of life and to knowledge and experience of the world. And whenever he discusses these topics, he is lavish in the use of poetic imagery and vivid imaginative discourse. In his "Advancement of Learning," he is irresistibly tempted to wander over far larger fields than the immediate topic requires, in order to introduce most exquisite discussions of the symbolic meanings which he finds in the fables of ancient mytholog}^ He lingers over all sorts of social and ethical questions, — Nobility, Beauty, Riches, Praise, Fortune and such like. We may v/ell ask why he should decorate his philosophy with plumage of this kind. In truth, the only reason is that the philosopher is really a poet. He must sing, for his native region is Parnassus, and the stores of wisdom and of beauty which he finds in the sacred mount, flow forth spontaneously whenever he speaks. Even in the Novum Orgnnnui his scientific expositions sparkle with the jewels of fancy ; the nomen- clature of his inductive processes is one of the most astonishing exhibitions of witty invention ever produced. The wine of Poetry distilled from his "Vintages" almost intoxicates the senses, and often half spoils his science. Harvey was puzzled, perhaps with some mixture of scorn, at these scientific discourses of the "Chancellor." He SHELLEY ON BACON AS POET, 35 had not been accustomed to such science — it had never come forth from his shop, none of his masters discoursed thus. The surprising feature of the case is, that notwith- standing the poetry, the science is so good. Such a blending of scientific insight and poetic fancy is without parallel in all literature. Goethe is the nearest approach. Bacon spoke of himself as a "concealed poet," and I have seen no approach to a satisfactory explanation of this most remarkable utterance, except that which connects him with Shakespeare. And all the best critics and biographers of Bacon refer to his poetical attributes. If testimony relating to poetic faculty apart from poetic art is to have any weight, that of Shelley may suffice. More than once he dwells enthusiastically on the poetic character of Bacon's mind. "Like Plato" — Shelley writes in his " Symposium," — "he exhibits the rare union of close and subtle logic with the Pythian enthusiasm of poetry, melted by the splendour and harmony of his periods into one irresistible stream of musical impressions, which hurry the persuasions onward as in a breathless career. His language is that of an immortal spirit rather than a man." These words, though applied primarily to Plato, are expressly handed on to Bacon. And in his "Defence ■of Poetry," Shelley writes : — " Lord Bacon was a poet. His language has a sweet and majestic rhythm which satisfies the sense, no less than the almost superhuman wisdom of his philosophy satisfies the intellect. It is a strain which distends, and then bursts the circumference of the reader's mind, and pours itself forth together with it, into the universal element sympathy " (Defence of Poetry "). 3. — Bacon's Concealments. Bacon writes of himself as "a concealed poet." One argument against his supposed Shakespearian authorship is derived from the concealment involved. It is contended •that if Bacon had written "Shakespeare" some indications 36 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. of this would certainly appear in his correspondence, or in that of his personal friends, some of whom must have shared the secret with him. If Bacon himself wished to conceal this fact he would doubtless do so very effectually, and would pledge his friends (especially Ben Jonson, John Heminge, and Henry Condell), to respect his incognito. The reasons for this secrecy are not difficult to conjecture, and have been so fully discussed by Baconian writers that I need not here dilate upon them. (See Reed's "Bacon v. Shakespeare," p. 124. Donnelly's "Great Crypt.," i. 246.) Suffice it to say that for reasons of his own, doubtless good and sufficient, he elected to be known by his con- temporaries and by immediate posterity as a philosopher and reformer of science, rather than as a poet, especially a dramatic poet. But there is another side to this conceal- ment which is less noticed. Bacon's private life has never been written, and the materials for writing it do not exist, or certainly have not been found. His public life, as a statesman and lawyer is very fully known, but we never catch a glimpse of him in his parlour, or study, or bedroom. His private letters have nearly all disappeared, and such personal recollections as his contemporaries penned do not supply any important particulars of home life and its. domestic details. Spedding publishes a letter written to> his niece referring to her approaching marriage, and pre-^ fixes the following remarks : — "The letter which follows is again a solitary specimen. . . . A letter of advice from Bacon to his niece upon- an offer of marriage to which she was not inclinable, is a task which, exhibiting him in a new relation, throws some new light upon his character,— a light which is more valuable because, w^hile he has left the records of the business of his life for our inspection in such abundance and with so little reserve, — while he makes us welcome to attend him to the Court, the palace, the Parhament, and the council-board, to his gardens, his chambers, and his stud}', he seldom or never admits us to his fireside. We bacon's anonymous writings. 37 have a few letters of affection to kinsmen or familiar friends, which are amongst the most agreeable of his writings ; but if it had not been for the miscellaneous bundles of papers of all sorts left by his brother Anthony, and probably never examined, we should have known nothing at all of his more intimate domestic relations. Here we get a glimpse of him as an uncle only ; but in the absence of all records of that most intimate relation of all, ah account of which seems to have been expected of me, but must still be expected in vain, it is something to know how he acquitted himself in a correspondence with the daughter of his half-brother " (" Life," vi. 173). Here is one specimen of the way in which Bacon ''sequestered himself from popularity," and locked the door whenever he entered into his closet. And in other respects we can plainly see Bacon's fondness for self- concealment. There are several letters, published in Spedding's "Life," which, though written by Bacon, were appropriated, with his concurrence, by others. In Vol. L, page 97, is a long and important letter signed by Sir Francis Walsingham, which is undoubtedly Bacon's. The very characteristic letters to the Earl of Rutland on his travels, were sent to the Earl by Lord Essex as his own compositions, and are included in Devereux's Memoirs of the Earl of Essex. The editor was hardly prepared to find such compositions among the Essex MSS., and finds in them proofs of a greater literary gift than he supposed Essex to possess. No one familiar wiih Bacon's writings can have the least hesitation in assenting to Mr. Spedding's conclusion that they are his. There are also letters written for the Earl to Anthony Bacon, and another for Anthony's reply, intended to be used in order to restore Essex to the favour of the Queen. Of these letters Dr. Abbott says: — "The wonderful exactness with which he has caught the somewhat quaint, humorous, cumbersome style of Anthony, and the abrupt, incisive antithetical and passionately rhetorical style of Essex, makes the perusal 197609 38 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. of these letters a literary treat, independent of their other merits." Here also we find the dramatic faculty revealing itself. This hide-and-seek propensity is not without significance when the question of Bacon's relation to Shakespeare is under consideration. 4. — Bacon's Literary Output. Among the many shallow objections brought against the Baconian theory, one is founded on the assumption that Bacon was a voluminous writer, and that if we add to his avowed literary productions the Shakespearean Drama, he is loaded with such a stupendous literary progeny as no author could possibly generate. Moreover, he was so busy in state business as a lawyer, judge, counsellor, member of Parliament, confidential adviser to the King and the responsible rulers in State and Church, that he had very little spare time for authorship. As to Bacon's occupations in law and politics, they were very scanty up to the year 1607, when he was 46 years of age and was made Solicitor-General. His complaint was that he lacked employment. When he was 35 years old, he writes to his uncle. Lord Burghley, " My life hath been so private as I have had no means to do your Lordship's service." And as to his employment by the Queen he says, "Her service was a kind of freehold." And he ex- pressly said that his own private studies occupied him more than his public engagements. That these solitary pursuits were very absorbing we know from many indica- tions of the seclusion which he practised, which distressed his mother, and sometimes vexed those who sought access to him. Now it was during this time, — up to his 45th year, — when he had scarcely any public work and was labouring unremittingly in his study, that nearly all the Shakespeare plays appeared, His most important philo- sophical works began to appear in 1605, when the "Advancement" was published. The Novum Organon was not published till 1620. There were various small NOT A VOLUMINOUS AUTHOR. 39 and fragmentary anticipations of the Novum Organon which appeared in 1605, 1606, 1607, 1608, 1612 and 1616 ; and the "Essays" and " De Sapientia Vetenmi" and some smaller works appeared before 1609. But there is absolutely nothing that accounts for his private studies and literary pursuits during the first forty years of his life. When we proceed to make an estimate of the entire literary output of Bacon, as a scientific and philosophical writer, the amount is really somewhat small. His Life and Works, edited by Spedding and Ellis, occupy 14 8vo. volumes. But the prefaces, notes, editorial com- ments, translations from the Latin, and biographical narrative occupy more than half of the seven volumes of Biography. And a large space in all the fourteen volumes is devoted to business letters, speeches. State papers, evidences of witnesses or culprits in State trials, and such like documents, besides memoranda relating to private matters of no literary significance whatever, so that out of the 1,480 pages which are put down to Bacon's credit m the seven volumes devoted to the Life, only about 375 pages can be ranked as literature, and these seven volumes themselves contain 3,000 pages. If we calculate the whole amount contained in the fourteen volum.es we shall find it may be reckoned at about six such volumes, each containing 520 pages. And this includes the legal writ- ings and speeches. Bacon was 66 years old when he died. Such genius as his ripens early. When he was 20 he was a ripe scholar, and capable of literary production. And all we can find for his whole life amounts to about 70 pages per annum, less than 6 pages a month. Also, if the Shake- speare poetry was the only work of William Shakspere, certainly he was not a voluminous writer. Thirty-one years may be taken as a moderate estimate of the duration of his literary life, i.e., from 1585 till his death in 1616. And the result is, ^y plays and the minor poems, — not two plays for each year. It is clear — as a matter of numerical calculation, — that if the whole of Shakespeare and the 40 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. whole of Bacon's acknowledged works belong to the same author, the writer was not a voluminous author — not by any means so voluminous as Miss Braddon or Sir Walter Scott. Therefore, let this objection stand aside ; it vanishes into invisibility as soon as it is accurately tested. 5. — Bacon's Assurance of Immortality. Bacon's confident assurance of holding a lasting place in literature is one of the most striking features of his character, and it marks him as specially endowed with the poetic consciousness and temperament. In this respect Bacon and Shakespeare are absolutely alike, and the bold unhesitating assertion of this claim to immortality, which is common to the two, is almost unparalleled in literature. For, of all poets that ever lived, not one ever made more confident appeals to posterity, never did any poet more triumphantly discount the immortality of which he was absolutely assured. If we only take the couplets of the Sonnets, this assurance of lasting renown is more or less clearly expressed in nearly a score of them — in Sonnets 15, 17, 18, 19, 54. 55, 60, 63, 65, 74, 81, 100, loi, 104, 107, 123. And in many of the Sonnets the vision of future fame is the leading idea of the entire poem, as in 55, 63, 65, 74, 81, 100, and loi. This very marked characteristic of the Sonnets is one of the reasons for attributing to many of them a dramatic character. The poet who was so proudly conscious of future fame could not, in his own person, have written 71 and 72 ; the bold claimant to lasting renown could not have said on his own account : — For I am shamed by that which I bring forth, And so should you, to love things nothing worth. (Sonnet 72). This mood, does not last long, for when we pass on to the next Sonnet the dramatic entourage has changed. AMAZING SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS. 4I Bacon is speaking for himself, and the very premature consciousness of old age which led him, when compara- tively a young man, to write, " I wax now somewhat ancient ; one-and-thirty years is a great deal of sand in the hour-glass," expresses its sense of antiquity in the dejected minor strain, — That time of year thou mayst in me behold When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang Upon those boughs which shake against the cold, Bare, ruin'd choirs, where late the sweet birds sang. (Sonnet 73). But the strong grasp on futurity remains — we soon hear the note of triumph mingling with the sense of physical decay ; his " Line " will live after his body has passed away: Let that which is to be "the prey of worms" or the " coward conquest of a wretch's knife " — be forgotten ; — The worth of that is that which it contains And that is this, and this with thee remains. (Sonnet 74). This anticipation of immortality is one of the most characteristic marks of the poetic temperament, and the same bold appropriation of future fame is remarkably characteristic of Bacon. That proud appeal to posterity which pervades the Sonnets (it could not have found equally clear expression in the dramas or the other poems) finds equally articulate voice in Bacon's will, and in the frequent professions which he makes that his writings are intended to secure "merit and memory" in succeeding ages, even if he and they are neglected or misunderstood by his contemporaries. There is a magnifi- cent audacity in some of these declarations which is only paralleled by the equally daring prophesies of these poems. Perhaps the most remarkable of them all is one that has not hitherto been specially noticed. In Bacon's Dedi- cation of his " Advancement of Learning " to the King, he 42 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. refers to the fortune and accomplishments of that variously gifted monarch as uniting "the power and fortune of a King, the knowledge and illumination of a Priest and the learning and universality of a Philosopher ; " and then he refers to his own work in these most astonishing terms : "This propriety {i.e., property or characteristic), inherent, and individual attribute in your Majesty, deserveth to be expressed, not only in the fame and admiration of the present time, nor in the history and tradition of the ages succeeding, but also in some solid work, fixed MEMORIAL, AND IMMORTAL MONUMENT, BEARING A CHARACTER OR SIGNATURE BOTH OF THE POWER OF A KING, AND THE DIFFERENCE AND PERFECTION OF SUCH A KING. THEREFORE I DID CONCLUDE WITH MYSELF THAT I COULD NOT MAKE UNTO YOUR MAJESTY A BETTER OBLATION THAN OF SOME TREATISE TENDING TO THAT END." A more majestic and poetic anticipation of immortality never issued from human pen. The magnificent egotism is here sublime ; in almost every other case it would be ridiculous. It could only have come from the same pen which, a few years before, had written : You still shall live (such virtue hath my pen) Where breath most breathes, even in the mouths of men. (Sonnet 8i.) Or,- Thou in this shalt find thy monument, When tyrants' crests and tombs of brass are spent. {lb. 107.) Not often in straightforward prose do we meet with the Horatian vaunt : Exegi monumentum rere perennius Regalique situ pyramidum altius ; Quod non imber edax, non Aquilo impotens Possit diruere, aut innumerabilis Annorum series et f uga temporum. ANTICIPATIONS OF IMMORTALITY, 43 But Bacon is equal to this immense self-consciousness, which, in an inferior writer, would be insufferable audacit}-. There is nothing inconsistent with what we know of his own self-estimation in supposing that he, and he alone in that age, was capable of this proud utterance : Not marble, nor the gilded ornaments Of princes, shall outlive this powerful rhyme ; But you shall shine more bright in these contents Than unswept stone, besmeared with sluttish time. When wasteful wars shall statues overturn. And broils root out the work of masonry. Not Mars his sword nor war's quick fire shall lourn The living record of your memory. 'Gainst death and all oblivious enmity Shall you pace forth ; your praise shall still find room Even in the e3-es of all posterity, That wear the world out to the ending doom.' — (55.) The immortality which Bacon anticipated for himself has certainly been achieved, and when his real relation to the Shakespeare drama is accepted by the world, as it assuredly will be, all that he claimed and prophesied will be admitted. The tremendous tragedy of his fall still blocks his way to the supremest throne of Parnassus. Detraction and calumny still blacken his reputation. The worst construction is put upon his faults, and his many virtues and excellencies are forgotten or explained awa}'. It will not be always so. 6. — Personal Characteristics. I will venture to point out some passages in Shake- speare which appear to me to reflect some of the personal characteristics of Bacon. The accuracy and significance of the resemblance will not at once commend itself to every one, and I do not attach any great importance to them. Let them be taken for what they are worth. (i) One very curious habit of Bacon's seems to have been to strike himself on the breast when he wished to put 44 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. emphasis or solemnity into his utterance. In a speech in Padiament in 1601, referring to the Queen's prerogative "to set at liberty things restrained by statute-law, or otherwise," he is reported to have said, " For the first she may grant non-obsiantcs contrary to the penal laws, which truly in my conscience {and so struck himself on the breast) are as hateful to the subject as monopolies, ("Life," III. 27.) Brutus is represented as using a similar gesture when he roused the Romans to revenge the death of Lucretia. This said, he struck his hand upon liis breast, And kiss'd the fatal knife, to end his vow. {Liicnxc, 1842.) Ophelia in her madness, Hems and beats her heart. {Ham. IV. V. 5.) Clarence's little boy asks the Duchess of York, Why do you wring your hands, and beat your breast And cry, " O, Clarence, my unhappy son ? " {Rich. III. II. ii. 3.) And Claudio represents Beatrice behaving in the same way, Then down upon her knees she falls, weeps, sobs, beats her heart, tears her hair, prays, curses. {Much Ado, II. iii. 152.) In the Return from Parnassus, which is I believe one of the Shakespearean group, Studioso, describing the condi- tions of his hired service, says that one of his obligations was: "That I shoulde work all harvest time. And upon this pointe the old churle gave a signe with a ' hemm ! ' to the old householde of silence, and began a solem, sencless oration against Idlenes, noddinge his head, knock- inge his hande on his fatt breste" (2 Parn., 655). And in another passage Amoretto laments that he "cannot walke the streete for these needy fellowes, and that after there is BACON S SLIPPERY STANDING. 45 a Statute come out against begging." And then follows the stage direction, ''He strikes his breast'' (3 Parn., 1684). (2) There are many passages in Shakespeare which carry the sombre colouring which darkened his life after his fall. This may be traced in the portrait of Cardinal Wolsey in Henry VHI. It is the pervading quality of the play of Timon, one of those plays never heard of till its publication in 1623. The sudden reverse of fortune from the greatest magnificence and opulence to the most sordid destitution, is exactly what Bacon experienced ; for after his fall his condition of penury was like that of a suppliant for alms ; " date obolum Belisario," he writes, " I that have borne a bag can bear a wallet.'' The lavish generosity of Timon, and his almost inexcusable carelessness about money in the time of his prosperity, reflects a weakness, almost amounting to a fault, strikingly characteristic of Bacon. Bacon's lament over his fall, and the sense of danger which always accompanies greatness (a sentiment fre- quently expressed at different periods of his life) is abundantly reflected in Shakespeare. In 1612, when the Essay of "Great Place" was published. Bacon wrote: " The rising unto place is laborious, and by pains men come to greater pains; and it is sometimes base, and by indignities men come to dignities. The standing is slippery, and the regress is either a downfall or at least an eclipse, which is a melancholy thing." In 1603 Bacon described the appointment of Essex to the command of the army in Ireland as locus lubricus (see the "Essex Apology"); the word is used by Tacitus, Cicero, and other Latin authors in this sense, and this insecure or "slippery" standing, with the subsequent "downfall or eclipse " is often noticed in Shakespeare. A sceptre snatch'd with an unruly hand Must be as boisterously maintain'd as gain'd; And he that stands upon a slippery place Makes nice of no vile hold to stay him up. [■fohn III. iv. 135). 46 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. They that stand high have many blasts to shake them, And, if they fall, they dash themselves to pieces. (Rich. III. I. iii. 259). O world, thy slippery turns ! " {Cor. IV. iv. 12). What ! am I poor of late ? 'Tis certain, greatness, once fall'n out with fortune, Must fall out with men too : what the declined is He shall as soon read in the eyes of others As feel in his own fall; for men, like butterflies. Show not their mealy wings but to the summer; And not a man, for being simply man, Hath any honour, but honour for those honours That are without him, as place, riches, favour. Prizes of accident as oft as merit : Which, when they fall, as being slippery standers, The love that lean'd on them as slippery too, Do one pluck down another, and together. Die in the fall. {Tro. Crcs. III. iii. 74). Farewell, my lord; I as your lover speak. The fool slides o'er the ice that you should break. (7;.. 214). The art o' the court As liard to leave as keep; whose top to climb Is certain falling, or so slippery that The fear's as bad as falling . , . which dies i' the search And hath as oft a slanderous epitaph As record of fair act; nay, many times. Doth ill deserve by doing well; what's worse, Must court'sy at the censure : O boys, lliis story The world may read in inc. . . . My report ivas once First ivitli the best of note, &c. [Cyinb. III. iii. 46 — 70). When Fortune, in her shift and change of mood, Spurns down her late beloved, all his dependants, W^hich labour'd after him to the mountain's top. Even on their knees and hands, let him slip down, Not one accompanying his declining foot. {Tiinon I. i. 84). And the figure of an eclipse is one of Shakespeare's most BACON UNDER ECLIPSE. 47 usual metaphors for loss of reputation or position. Here is a small collection of such metaphors. No more be grieved at that which thou hast done; Roses have thorns and silver fountains mud; Clouds and ecHpses stain both moon and sun, And loathsome canker lives in sweetest bud. (Sonnet 35). Nativity, once in the main of light, Crawls to maturity, wherewith being crown'd, Crooked eclipses 'gainst his glory fight, And Time that gave doth now his gift confound. (Sonnet 60). Alack ! our terrene moon is now eclipsed. Ant. CI. III. xiii. 153. The mortal moon hath her eclipse endured. (Sonnet 107). (Referring evidently to Queen Elizabeth). (3) Bacon's self-vindication is apparently secreted in many passages in Shakespeare. In a letter to Buckingham, written in the Tower, May 31st, 1621, Bacon writes: " When I am dead, he is gone that was always in one tenor, a true and perfect servant to his master, and one that was never author of an}^ immoderate, no, nor unsafe, no (I will sa}^ it), nor unfortunate counsel, and one that no temptation could ever make other than a trusty, and honest, and thrice-loving friend to your lordship." This is not unlike Ariel's self-commendation to Prospero. Remember, I have done thee worthy service, Told thee no lies, made thee no mistakings. Without or grudge or grumbling. {Tempest I. ii. 247). One of the most striking of these vindicatory passages is that spoken by Lord Say in 2 Henry VI. And it should be noted that these lines did not exist in the early draft of this play — the Contention. They were not given to the world till 1623. Even up to i6ig the play was republished 48 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. without these most significant additions. Lord Say is pleading for his Hfe to Jack Cade and his murderous crew. Hear me but speak, and bear me where you will. Justice with favour have I always done; Prayers and tears have moved me, gifts could never. (Observe, he does not say that he never received gifts, — he admits that he had, — but only that his administration of justice was never perverted or changed by them, that they had not influenced him.) When have I aught exacted at your hands, But to maintain the king, the realm, and you ? Large gifts have I bestowed on learned clerks, Because my book preferr'd me to the king, And seeing ignorance is the curse of God, Knowledge the wing wherewith we fly to heaven. These cheeks are pale for watching for 3'our good. Long silling to determine poor men's causes Hath made me full of sickness and diseases. Tell me wherein have I offended most ? Have I affected wealth, or honour ? Speak ! Are my chests fill'd up with extorted gold ? Is my apparel sumptuous to behold ? Whom have I injured that ye seek my death ? (2 Henry VI. IV. vii. 63 — no). (4). One of the most significant characteristics recorded of Bacon is his dramatic faculty. Mallet says of him, "In his conversation he would assume the most differing characters and speak the language proper to each with a facility that was perfectly natural, for the dexterity of the habit concealed every appearance of art." Osborn speaks in still more striking terms : "I have heard him entertain a country lord in the proper terms relating to hawks and dogs, and at another time out-cant a London chirurgeon." Now, is it not a little remarkable that a THE POET A NATURAL ORATOR. 49 precisely similar gift is attributed to Prince Hal : " I am so good a proficient in one quarter of an hour, that I can drink with any tinker in his own language during my life." (i Henry IV. II. iv. 19). In another respect the Prince corresponds to the character of Bacon given by his friends. His eloquence is described as so facile and charming that "the ears of his hearers received more gratification than trouble, and (they were) no less sorry when he did conclude than displeased with any that did interrupt him." (Osborn). Ben Jonson, in slightly different words, says the same thing : — " The fear of every man who heard him was lest he should make an end." So the Prince is described : " When he speaks, The air, a charter'd libertine, is still, And the mute wonder lurketh in men's ears, To steal his sweet and honeyed sentences." (Henry V. I. i. 47.; The poet, whoever he was, in his portraiture of the Prince must have drawn either upon his own observations, or on his own experience of the dramatic and rhetoric faculty, and its manifestations in private and public dis- course ; and even if he was not conscious of self- portraiture, yet if he was naturally an actor or an orator the instance most opportune for his use was himself; and doubtless fragments of self-portraiture must exist in many of the characters which he has so graphically drawn. The passages, however, just quoted are so mmutely individual that they were undoubtedly more applicable to Bacon than to any other man then living. (5). There is another very curious reflection of Bacon's character and temperament in the poem of Lucrcce. Lucretia condemns herself to death for an offence which has been forced upon her, for which she is not morally guilty, yet which, through the stress of circumstances, she has committed. She does not, however, seek to justify, though she does to palliate, her crime. Like E 50 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Bacon, she renounces all defence, and submits to the judgment of the court which condemns her, which in her case is no other than herself. She knew, however, that she was personally innocent, though involved in the "unrecalling crime" of another person. Like Bacon, while pleading guilty, she can interrogate her unstained conscience — What is the quaUty of mine offence, Being constrain'd with dreadful circumstance ? May my pure mind witli the foul act dispense, My low-declined honour to advance ? May any terms acquit me from this chance ? The poison'd fountain clears itself again ; And why not I from this compelled stain ? — 1702. Even so Bacon, for some time after his condemnation, expected to resume his ordinary functions as counsellor to Parliament and adviser to the King after he had been cleared from his "compelled stain." In Bacon's fall one of the most remarkable features of his case is the way in which he renounced all self-defence and accepted the judgment pronounced against him. "Your lordship," he writes to Buckingham, "spake of purgatory. I am now in it, but my mind is in a calm, for my fortune is not my felicity. I know I have clean hands and a clean heart, and, I hope, a clean house for friends and servants." And yet he will not ask for acquittal on these grounds. He asks the Lords for a fair trial, and for some convenient time "to advise with my counsel, and to make my answer ; wherein nevertheless, my counsel's part will be the least ; for I shall not, by the grace of God, trick up an innocency with cavillations, but plainly and ingenuously (as your lordships know my manner is) declare what I know and remember desiring no privilege of greatness for subterfuge of guilti- ness." And to the King he writes: "I shall deal ingenuously with your Majesty, without seeking fig-leaves or subterfuges." Afterwards, to the Lords : " I do under- STRANGELY GUILTY INNOCENCE. 51 stand there hath been heretofore expected from me some justification ; and therefore I have chosen one only justifi- cation, instead of all other, one of the justifications of Job ; for, after the clear submission and confession which I shall now make unto your lordships, I hope I may say and justify with Job in these words : ' I have not hid my sin as did Adam, nor concealed my faults in my bosom.' This is the only justification which I will use. It resteth, therefore, that, without fig-leaves, I do ingenuously con- fess and acknowledge that, having understood the particulars of the charge, not formally from the House, but enough to inform my conscience and memory, I find matter sufficient and full both to move me to desert the defence, and to move your lordships to condemn and censure me." This was surely a most extraordinary course for a man to take who knew that his hands and conscience were clean, and superficial critics have been often too ready to take him at his own word, without any careful enquiry into what his words really imply, or how they are connected with and interpreted by his personal character and habits. One reason indeed for his submission may be that he knew his case was not being tried in a court of justice ; the verdict and sentence would be put to the vote and determined by a show of hands, and by the decision of a majority, most of whom were absolutely ignorant of judicial procedure, and in- capable of judicial deliberation, but were swayed by the most vivid or recent impressions that party, or passion, or plausible rhetoric might suggest. It might then be politic to abandon anything like a scientific judicial plea, and trust to the leniency which absolute surrender might inspire. However this may be, such was the attitude he assumed. Conscious (as he expressly said) of moral innocence, he yet called for condemnation and censure upon himself. Lucretia acted in precisely the same way. She is speaking, in thought, to her husband : — " For me, I am the mistress of my fate ; 52 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. And with my trespass never will dispense, Till life to death acquit my forced offence. I will not poison thee with my attaint, Nor fold my fault in cleanly-coin'd excuses ; My sable ground of sin I will not paint. To hide the truth of this false night's abuses ; M}^ tongue shall utter all ; mine eyes, like sluices, As from a mountain-spring that feeds a dale. Shall gush pure streams to purge my impure tale." — 1069-78. Subsequently, when her husband and his companions are present, " 'Few words,' quoth she, 'shall fit the trespass best, Where no excuse can give the fault amending : In me moe woes than words are now depending.' " — 1613. Lucretia's self-justification is, however, the same as Bacon's : — " O teach me how to make mine own excuse ! Or at least this refuge let me find ; Though ni}^ gross blood be stain'd with this abuse. Immaculate and spotless is my mind. That was not forced ; that never was inclined To accessor}' yieldings, but still pure Doth in her poison'd closet yet endure." Her friends try to console her and to turn the edge of her self-condemnation. " 'No, no,' quoth she, 'no dame, hereafter living, B}' my excuse shall claim excuse's giving.' " —1714. Bacon finds similar reasons for gladness in the depth of his grief: "The first is (he writes) that hereafter the great- ness of a judge or magistrate shall be no sanctuar}^ or protection of guiltiness which, in a few words [a very frequent phrase with Bacon, and in Shakespeare it is bacon's case anticipated. . 53 equally frequent] is the beginning of a golden world." Both Lucrece and Bacon contract their self-defence into "few words." These lines from Lucrece are very interest- ing as showing how true to himself Bacon was from the beginning to the end of his life, and that the heroic self- immolation, which he pictured with such graphic and poetic touches in Lucrece, more than thirty years before his fall, was the temper of his own mind, which he was quite ready to carry into action whenever the time for its application might come. Here is a remarkable anticipation of Bacon's own case. His censors often sa}^ — a distinguished Barrister, now a Judge, used such language in writing to me, — " You see, he confesses himself to be guilty ; what more can you want ? " The reply is, — Lucrece also made a like con- fession ; she also found matter sufficient and full to move her to desert her defence, and require the Court to con- demn her. And yet her fault was entirety constructive, — it left her with clean hands and clean heart. Her friends entreated her to pardon herself. " With this they all at once began to say Her body's stain her mind untainted clears." —1709. She rejects the plea, and without cavillations or fig- leaves surrenders herself to the doom she has pronounced on herself. Other very curious personal traits will be illustrated in the next two chapters. 54 CHAPTER IV. / CANNOT TELL. There is a phrase occurring in the opening of Bacon's Essay of "Truth"— the first in the immortal Volume — which may sound strange and only half intelligible when first read. This is the passage : — The Essayist is remarking on " the difficulty and labour which men take in finding out of truth," and the bondage which when found it " imposeth upon men's thoughts," which leads men to prefer their own false ideas to the substitutes which know- ledge supplies. Not only does this bring lies into favour, but there is "a natural though corrupt love of the lie itself." And then he proceeds : " One of the latter school of the Grecians examineth this matter and is at a stand to think what should be in it, that men should love lies, where neither they make for pleasure, as with poets ; nor for advantage, as with the merchant ; but for the lie's sake. But I cannot tell." The Latin has Sed nescio quo inodo. This phrase, / cannot tell, at first staggers the reader. It is not that the puzzle baffles the writer, for he immedi- ately proceeds to give a very beautiful and poetical solution of it, adding, " This same truth is a naked and open daylight, that doth not show the masques, and mummeries and triumphs of the world half so stately and daintily as candle-lights. " Bacon's meaning is easily mis- understood : — the reader may say, what I have heard from the lips of a noble and accomplished lady, "I don't agree with Bacon: No one loves a lie for its own sake." The lies, or fictions to which Bacon refers are not vulgar fibs, but philosophical conceits, speculative inventions taking the A POETIC FICTION. 55 place of Nature's facts and laws. And the expression, " I cannot tell," may be taken as an articulate sigh, a sort of Heigh-ho ! Well-a-day ! Oh dear, dear ! in which the languid expression of defeat is more apparent than real. He does not quite mean what he says, there is in the exclamation a sort of poetic insincerity, as if he were him- self in propria persona supplying an instance to illustrate his thesis. For he can tell, and does tell as we have seen in the next sentence. Let this be well noted: the collapse of judgment apparently expressed by the phrase, I cannot tell, is not real, it is assumed, a poetic fiction, a dramatic disguise, a closed door to be opened for surprise, a momentary affectation of helpless embarrassment, which makes the subsequent return to intellectual vigour and sufficiency all the more striking. That this is the con- scious, almost technical meaning of the phrase may be clearly shown by some Shakespearean instances, one shew- ing its use, others its abandonment. The mode of using the phrase is clearly explained by Scarus, Anthony's faithful friend, when his fortunes were lowest ; evil portents threaten him, and those whose business is to interpret them, shrink from disclosing their import. Swallows have built In Cleopatra's sails their nest ; the augurers Say they know not, ihey cannot tell ; look grimly And dare not speak their knowledge. {Ant. and Clco., IV. xii. 4.) Evidently, I cannot tell is the formula of evasion, or insincerity : the augurers cannot, only because they dare not. The case of abandonment is to be found in the 2nd part of the old play the Contention, i.e., The True Tragedy: in which the following passage occurs : We at Saint Albons met, Our battles ioinde, and both sides fiercelie fought. But, whether twas the coldness of the King, He lookt full gentlie on his warlike Queen, That robde my souldiers of their heated spleene, 56 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Or whether twas report of his successe, Or more than common feare of CHffords rigor, Who thunders to his captaines blond and death, / cannot tell. {True Tragedy, II. i. 87.) The same passage, with a few verbal alterations, (such as her success for his ; captives for captains) occurs in 3 Henry VI. II. i. 120. But instead of / cannot tell, we find I cannot ji^dge. The reason is plain. For here the per- plexity is not simulated, it is real ; the alternatives pre- sented are all possible, all reasonable, and all cannot be true. The speaker has no means of selecting the true alternative, the suspense is genuine, accordingly the phrase which is only to be used for a mock perplexity is changed for one that expresses a real doubt. The incorrect version was printed in the three quartos, 1595, 1600 and 1619. The amended version appeared first in 1623, seven years after the death of William Shakspere. A similar change was made in the 1623 Edition of the Merry Wives, as compared with the two quartos of 1602 and 1619. Slender. — Have you bears in your town. Mistress Anne, that your dogs bark so ? Anne. — I cannot tell, Mr. Slender : I think there be. (I. i. 83.) This is plainly not an occasion for "I cannot tell : " it had slipped in accidentally. Accordingly the Folio has, Anne. — I think there are. Sir, I heard them talked of. (I. i. 298.) If an authentic version of these plays existed in i6ig, why was the incorrect passage then re-published, why wait till 1623 for the right version ? Doubtless the change was made by the author after 1619. In nearly all other cases the mental attitude of the Essay of "Truth " is reflected. Thus Richard, as Duke of Gloster, is reproached by the Queen of Edward IV., for his bitter aversion to herself and her family. Why does he hate them so ; and with a shrug of mock perplexity he replies, FORMULA OF FARCE AND MELODRAMA. 57 I cannot tell ; and the fantastic explanation follows, as in the Essay, I cannot tell. The world is grown so bad That wrens make prey where eagles dare not perch : Since every Jack became a Gentleman There's many a gentle person made a Jack. (Richard III., I. iii. 70.) This passage may be compared with two entries in Bacon's " Promus : " " Jack would be a gentleman if he could speak French " (No. 640) ; and, '' There is no good accord where every Jack would be a lord " (No. 968). In Falstaff's exquisitely amusing cut and thrust encounter with the Lord Chief Justice, a similar use of / cannot tell helps his persiflage. His Lordship says, "You follow the young prince up and down, like his evil angel." The wicked old jester purposely mistaking the word angel for the coin of the same name, retorts, " Not so, my lord, your. ill angel is light ; but I hope he that looks upon me will take me without weighing. And yet, in some respects, I grant, I cannot go," {i.e., I cannot pass current for the good coin I really am). " I cannot tell. Virtue is of so little regard in these costermonger times that true valour is turned bear-herd," {i.e., I am the keeper of this young cub.) " Pregnancy [intellectual capacity] is made a tapster and hath his quick wit wasted in giving reckon- ings." (2 Hen. IV., I. ii. 185.) The technical Baconian sense of, I cannot tell, requires here to be kept in mind ; for a very capable commentator paraphrases it as equivalent to, " I cannot pass — in counting." But this is already expressed by, " I cannot go." / cannot tell is the proper prelude to a farcical and hypocritical explanation which the speaker flings at his interlocutor. Another case is found in N3^m's speech referring to Pistol's marriage with Dame Quickly. Nym is very morti- fied, — he is jilted, and vows in melodramatic inuendo all sorts of sanguinary vengeance, too dreadful to be described. He, too, is at a stand (like the Essayist), to know what 58 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. special atrocity is impending ; he will not trust himself to say, it is a little past his control, and the formula of mock perplexity is required at both ends of his speech. "/ cannot tell : things must be as they may. Men may sleep ; and they may^have their throats about them at that time : and some say knives have edges. It must be as it may : though patience be a tired mare, yet she will plod. There must be conclusions. Well, I cannot tell." {Hen. V. II. i, 22.) Again, Benedict, who mocks at lovers, speculates whether he shall ever himself fall in love, and be as ridiculous as Claudio. He is evidently quite sure that such an absurdity can never happen ; yet he is willing to trifle with the idea: and accordingly he exclaims, " May I be so converted, and see with these eyes ? I cannot tell : 1 think not : I will not be sworn, but love may transform me to an oyster ; but I'll take my oath on it, till he have made an oyster of me, he shall never make me such a fool." (M. Ado. II. iii. 23.) The mockery is perfect, and its typical formula accurately used. So Shylock answers Antonio : They had been speaking of Jacob's manoeuvre to enrich himself at Laban's expense, and Antonio asks, Was this inserted to make interest good ? Or is 3'our gold and silver ewes and rams ? Shylock shrugs his shoulders with affected embarrassment and replies, / cannot fell ; I make it breed as fast. {Mcr. v., I. iii. 95.) Sometimes the expression occurs in serious discourse, but the feigning characteristic is always present ; there is some extravagance or fancy with which the speaker is intellectually toying. Thus the wounded soldier who des- cribes the heroism of Macbeth and Banquo in battle, says, Except they meant to bathe in reeking wounds, Or memorize another Golgotha, / cannot tell. {Macb. I. ii. 39.) BACON ALSO CANNOT TELL, 59 This is his way of picturing a bravery almost incredible, apparently impossible. Desdemona also, maddened by Othello's reproaches, yet tries to find some excuse for his unnatural cruelty ; accordingly she invents an excuse which she does not believe, but which is as good as any other ; she affects to think his treatment of her a sort of mistaken nursery discipline : — / cannot tell : those that do teach young babes, Do it with gentle means and easy tasks, He might have chid me so. {0th. IV., ii. iii.) The poet seems to think the phrase a little compro- mising, too likely to betray his incognito, and accordingly varies it in some passages. The substituted phrases are less forcible. / ivot not what is to be found in Rich. II., II. i. 250, and still more rugged is the substitute, I stagger in {Measure for Measure, I. ii. i6g.) In Bacon's prose the same trick of speech occurs repeatedly. In one case there is a plain indication that there is more of the will not than the can not in the import of it. Thus in the Essex Apology, he speaks of rumours which arose when Essex was com.mitted to the custody of the Lord Keeper. Bacon at that time had frequent occa- sions for conference with the Queen, " about the causes of her revenue and law business," and these interviews were misconstrued. "It was given out that I was one of them that incensed the Queen against my Lord of Essex, These speeches / cannot tell, nor I will not think, that they grew from the Queen herself." In this sentence, I cannot tell — as equivalent to I will not think,— is precisely similar to the passage quoted from Antony and Cleopatra^ in which, I cannot tell, I know not, is represented as equivalent to, I dare not speak. Invariably the note of insincerity or reserve, or non-committal, is to be found. He evidently thinks "these speeches " did come from the Queen, but refuses to say so distinctly, and affects a perplexity which 6o SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. he does not entirely feel. As to other rumours, he uses similar language : he had heard, " that while in^^ Lord was in Ireland, I revealed some matter against him, or / cannot tell ivhat." In these cases a certain contempt is expressed. So it is in some other cases, for in narrating his altercation with Lord Coke, he relates how, "AVith this he spake nei',her I nor himself could tell what, as if he had been born Attorney General ; " and at a later period, when Bacon was Lord Chancellor, and Coke as Lord Chiei Justice was trying to make his own Court supreme and penalize all appeals against its decisions. Bacon with quiet scorn says, "Wherein your Lordship may have heard a great rattle, and a noise of prcEumnire and I cannot tell what.'" In Bacon's speeches the phrase often occurs. In that referring to the naturalization of Scotch subjects, he dis- courses on the strength to be gained by union, and on the greater security to be found in the bravery of men, than in such stores of wealth as Spain had hoarded : — " If I should speak to you mine own heart, methinks we should a little disdain that the nation of Spain , . . should dream of a Monarchy in the West . . . only because they have ravished from some wild and unarmed people, mines and store of gold : and on the other hand, that this Isle of Britanny, seated and manned as it is, and that hath, I make no question, the best iron in the world, that is, the best soldiers in the world, should think of nothing but reckonings, and audits, and mcuni and timm, and / cannot tell what." He brushes aside all these un- worthy notions of security by scornfully ignoring them, and affecting ignorance of them. Bacon's charge touching Duels reflects the same noble scorn of the ceremonies and technicalities attending these deadly quarrels, as we find in Romeo and Juliet, in .4s You Like It, and other plays ; and here also Bacon's formula of scornful incredulity is found. " But I say the compounding of quarrels which is other- CEREMONIOUS SELF-DEPRECIATION. 6l wise used by private noblemen and gentlemen it is so punctual," {i.e., so full of punctilios), "and hath such reference and respect unto received conceits — what's beforehand, and what's behind, and I cannot tell what, as without all question doth in a fashion countenance and authorize the practice of duels, as if it had in it something of right." Justice Shallow talks about duels in much the same way, — " In these times you stand on distance, your passes, stoccadoes, 2in6. 1 know not what.''' {Merry Wives II. i. 233). The same use of the phrase, I cannot tell, is to be found in Bacon's letter to the king about cloth monopolies. (" Life," V. 258). In his " Observations on a Libel," I. 198; his "Charge against Talbot " V. 6, in that against Oliver St. John V. 145, &c. This phrase is specially adapted to the ceremonious and polite style of fictitious self-depreciation characteristic of the time. Such is the language proper to dedications, where it is to be found more than once. Thus the dedica- tion of the Novum Organuni to the king begins as follows : "Your Majesty may perhaps accuse me of larceny, having stolen from your affairs so much time as is required for this work. I cannot tell,''' " non habeo quod dicam : " but, as usual, the self vindication is ample and triumphant. The dedication of ' ' The Wisdom of the Ancients " to the Universit}' of Cambridge supplies another instance. Bacon professes to give back what he has already received, " that with a natural motion it may return to the place whence it came. And yet — I cannot tell, — there are few footprints pointing back towards you, among the infinite number that have gone forth from you." The Latin here is, "Et tamen, nescio quo modo," the same phrase which is employed in the Latin version of the Essay of "Truth." He proceeds to explain how the results of University study do really return to their source, and add to the credit and power of the teacher from whom they were derived. And, singularly enough, the same trick of speech or fashion of 62 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT, complimentary self-abasement is seen in the dedication of Venus and Adonis to the Earl of Southampton. The same hand that dedicated the Novum Organum to the king that he might "make this age famous to posterity," may surely be seen in the words addressed to the patron of the youthful poet : " Right Honourable, I know not how [Latinized, it might be ' nescio quo modo ? '] I shall offend in dedicating my unpolished lines to your lordship, noy how the world will censure me for choosing so strong a prop to support so weak a burden ; " but he seems to have 'b notion that his work will "always answer your own wish and the world's hopeful expectation." The feigned un- worthiness of the "unpolished lines," only covers a proud consciousness that his poem is destined to be immortal. Here, then, is a very remarkable trick of speech, quite as remarkable as any other personal feature, such as the tone of voice which identifies a speaker on the doorstep before he has entered the house, or the limping gait which helps recognition across the street. And I am strongly disposed to look upon it as a family feature inherited by Bacon from his mother. Readers of Bacon's biography will remember how his mother was troubled by his habits of studious seclusion, late hours, secret musings "Nescio quod," as she puts it — studying I cannot tell what. The substituted phrase which we find in Richard III., I wot not wot, is employed in one of her scornful moods, ("Life," L 115) and I cannot tell, is found several tmies in her letters. (" Life," L 114. Dixon's " Personal History," pp. 311, 317, 331). A Promus Note (1060) has " Nescio quid meditans nugarum, totus in illis ; musing on trifles, I know not what, and quite absorbed in them. ("Horace Sat." 1. ix. 2). This points to a classic origin for Lady Bacon's style of making her complaint. It shows where the expression circulating in the family came from. I may refer to another side light on this curious little phrase. The word tell, associated with the auxiliary ca7i, LIGHTS AND SHADOWS IN ONE PICTURE. 63 cajt tell, seems to be the selected phraseology for a mock- ing usage ; and in the slang of rustic jargon it becomes, "Ah, when! can'sttell?" a taunting challenge equivalent to some such phrase as don't yoii wish you may get it ? This is the reply of the carter when requested for a loan of his lantern (i Hen. IV., II. i. 43), and of the servant Luce, who refuses to open the door in reply to the knock- ings outside. {Comedy of Errors III. i. 53). Precisely the same phrase is found in Marlowe's ii^te-^r^ 77., II. v. 57, and in the revised edition of " Faustus," published 1616, twenty-three years after the reputed author's death (Sc. ix.). There can be no reasonable doubt that Bacon was the writer of all these passages. The commentators speak of the phrase as a current colloquial vulgarism, but I know of no proof that it was used by any speaker outside these dramas. Looking at the phrase as connected with the special characteristics of Bacon's mind, it seems to reflect his fondness for putting his ideas into a sort of masquerade, marshalling them in contending or contrasting ranks. The same mental tendency is seen in his habit of drawing up a series of "Antitheta," showing the pros and contras of a subject, allowing his mind to play with both sides, balanc- ing the affirmative and negative arguments, and pleasing his poetical fancies with varying cross-lights. It is in- teresting to watch the same mental attributes grandly philosophizing in the stately meditations of the " De Augmentis," and toying with Falstaffian fancies in East- cheap. The same nimbleness of intellect, the same exuberance of fancy and brilliancy of wit is shewn in both cases. It recalls his own axiom of sunshine everywhere- lighting up cloacae, cottages and castles with identical beams. 64 CHAPTER V. COMPANIONSHIP IN CALAMITY. Bacon's fall from the loftiest heights of place and dignity to the lowest depths of calamity and disgrace is one of the most tragic events in personal history ever recorded. The pity and the pathos of it is infinite. He was unprepared for it. No qualms of conscience, no inward self-reproach, no consciousness of hidden crime and vulnerable circum- stance, no shrinking from scrutiny, no sense of approach- ing calamity disturbed his righteous security. Even when the bolt had fallen, he professed that he had " clean hands and a clean heart," he had nothing to fear from the fullest exposure of all he had done. The absence of all premoni- tory signs must on the subsequent retrospect have surprised him, and contradicted some maxims of his philosophy. He was accustomed to think that. Before the times of change, still is it so : By a divine instinct men's minds mistrust Ensuing dangers ; as, by proof, we sec , The waters swell loeforc a boisterous storm. {Rich. III. II. iii. 41). But it was not so in his case : No cloudy show of stormy, blustering weather Doth yet in his fair welkin once appear. (Lucrcce, 115). It is well to remark how closely the storm signals of Shakespeare and Bacon correspond. In the Essay of " Seditions and Troubles" we read, " As there are certain hollow blasts of wind and secret swellings of seas before a . BACON SEES NO STORM PORTENTS. 65 tempest, so there are in States; " and then he enumerates such foreshadows of change as are most graphically described in John IV. ii. 143 — 152, 185 — 202. This is the kind of "swelling in the State, which is signified by the infancy of Typhon." (" Wisdom of the Ancients," II.), The swelling of the sea before a storm is frequently referred to. "It is likewise everywhere observed that waters somewhat rise and swell before storms." "The sea swelling silently and rising higher than usiial in the harbour, or the tide com- ing in quicker than ordinary, prognosticates wind." " Hist, of Winds " (Works V, 161 ; 193). "It has likewise been remarked that sometimes the sea swells, not at the time of the flood, and with no external wind. And this generally precedes some great storm."" ("Hist. Dense and Rare," V. 360). The expositor of the Philosophia Prima certainly would not say that the kind of premonition of catastrophe which precedes tempests in States does not attend personal disaster. Such portents really existed in his case, but Bacon was too blameless and too unsuspicious to see them, nothing to indicate that such portents appeared to him. Even when the nature and reality of his peril became manifest, he had no moral guilt to confess, only a venial carelessness. Absolutely just himself, he yet discovered to his astonishment that he had become constructively corrupt, and he fell, never to rise again in the State. It was a blow which would have crushed anyone less endowed with heroic endurance, and with feebler resources in discovering motives of consolation. My object in recalling these well-known facts is to point out a very remarkable kind of consolation which Bacon found in his grief. He sought solace in many ways; he found it in his religion, in strenuous literary work, in sym- pathy and friendship, and in philosophy or contemplation. This last method of obtaining comfort — by contemplation — deserves careful study: it is both singular and charac- teristic. Bacon found relief by a sense of fellowship with F 66 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. great men of former times, who had suffered in the same way. By a strong effort of imagination he summoned into his presence the mighty dead, whose griefs had been hke his own, and found a noble comfort in their society. There is something very interesting and very unusual in this mental attitude; it sounds more like a dream of poetry than a fact of experience. It could only be possible for a mind in whom the dramatic, realising faculty was naturally and exceptionally strong, and highly cultivated. That Bacon could and did thus take refuge in an ideal world, his own letters testify, and in one of them he gives a philo- sophic statement of the principle. In 1622, a year after his fall, he wrote a Discourse touching a Holy War, a war against the Turk, and prefaced it by a dedication to his dear and trusted friend, Dr. Lancelot Andrews, Bishop of Winchester. This dedication opens as follows: — "My Lord, — Amongst consolations it is not the least to represent to a man's self like examples of calamity in others. For examples give a quicker impression than argument ; and besides, they certify us that which the Scriptures also tendereth for satisfaction, that no new thing is happened unto us. This they do the better by how much the examples are liker in circumstances to our own case ; and more especially if they fall upon persons that are greater and worthier than ourselves. For as it savoureth of vanity, to match ourselves highly in our own conceit; so on the other side it is a good, sound conclusion, that if our betters have sustained the like events, we have the less cause to be grieved. " In this kind of consolation I have not been wanting to myself; though as a Christian I have tasted (through God's great goodness) of higher remedies. Having, therefore, through the variety of my reading, set before me many examples, both of ancient and later times, my thoughts (I confess) have chiefly strayed upon three particulars, as the most eminent and most resembling. All three, persons that had held chief place of authority in their countries; all HISTORIC PARALLELS. 67 three ruined., not by war, or by any other disaster, but by justice and sentence, as delinquents and criminals: all three famous writers, insomuch as the remembrance of their calamity is now to posterity, but as a little picture of night- work, remaining amongst the fair and excellent tables of their acts and works; and all three (if that were anything to the matter) fit examples to quench any man's ambition of rising again ; for that they were every one of them restored with great glory, but to their further ruin and destruction, ending in a violent death. These men were Demosthenes, Cicero, and Seneca— persons that I durst not claim affinity with, except the similitude of our fortunes had contracted it." (" Life," VII. 371 ; Works, VII. II). Bacon pursues the comparison by giving details of the separate cases, and comparing them with his own. The same spirit is shewn in a letter to the King referring to his fall : — " Utar, saith Seneca to his master, niagnis excmplis, nee me(Z fortnncF sed tucc. Demosthenes was banished for bribery of the highest nature, yet was recalled with honour, Marcus Livius was condemned for exactions, yet after- wards made Consul and Censor. Seneca, banished for ■divers corruptions, yet was afterwards restored, and an instrument of that memorable Quinquennium Neronis. Many more." ("Life," VII. 297). Thus we see that, when Bacon was in trouble, his shaping imagination gave actuality to the historic pictures which his former studies had stored up in his mind, and in musing on sorrows like his own, his own became less. Surely here we have the most perfect, practical, and ideal ■development of the poetic temperament — one of "imagi- nation all compact." Never did it rise higher; it gave him a new heaven and a new earth, and lifted him out of his sordid surroundings into a supernal sphere, among princes and consecrated presences. Like religion, it was the sub- 68 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. stance and evidence of unseen things, a revelation of celestial beauty. Here is his portrait: — The poet's eye, in a tine frenzy rolling, Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to lieaven; And as imagination bodies forth The forms of things unknown, the poet's pen Turns them to shapes, and gives to airy nothing A local habitation and a name. Such tricks hath strong imagination. That if it would but apprehend some joy. It comprehends some bringer of that joy. (M. N. D. V. i. 12.) This is a kind of sentiment which we might expect to see condensed into an epigram, or shaped into a lyric, or paraded as a piece of ostentatious defiance, or cheap bravery, or used as a flourish by an unsmitten moralist, in order to give literary interest and brightness to his homilies on patience and resignation. But in these cases it is a flower, not a fruit ; a picture, not a breathing, living creature. Bacon makes it the very food of his. suftering soul, and in this respect he stands alone among all the sufferers memorized in history or biography. He has, however, one absolutely similar copy, — and that is Shakespeare. The poet " Shakespeare " was evidently a man of the same type ; this secret source of solace continually pre- sented itself to his mind, and he discourses of it in a reflective philosophic style closely resembling Bacon's letter to Bishop Andrews. The resemblance is striking, both in thought and expression. When we our betters see bearing our woes We scarcely think our miseries our foes. Who alone suffers, suffers most i' the mind, Leaving free things and happy shows behind. But then the mind much sufferance doth o'erskip When grief hath mates, and bearing fellowship. How light and portable my pain seems now, When that which makes me bend, makes the King bow, He childed as I fathered. {Lear III. vi. 109). THE PEDAGOGIC POET. 69 It is very interesting to note that this passage from Lear is to be found only in the early quarto editions, published many years before Bacon's fall. They were left out in the 1623 folio, probably because the}- are too didactic for the passion of the play. The Clarendon Editor, Dr. W. Aldis Wright, remarking on this omission, says, " Very properly so ; there is nothing in the lines either of Shakespeare's language or manner" — in which criticism I venture to diifer from the learned Editor. So far as sentiment is concerned, which is the deepest matter, it is very characteristically Shakespearean, as the passages hereafter cited will abundantly prove ; and so far as language is con- cerned "Our betters" — with variation of pronoun — occurs quite a dozen times (See ex.gr., Twjelfth Nighi I. iii. 125; As You Like It II. iv. 68). Bending or bowing under suffer- ing is Shakespearean : {Henry V. III. vi. 132 — 138). " Childed and Fathered" is of course very Shakespearean. Portia is proud that she is "so fathered and so husbanded." See Abbott's " Shakespeare Grammar," 294. Bacon's " Promus " contains a note which was utilized in this passage, "Better to bow than break," No. 944; and Bacon's " Hist. Hen. VII." has " The enterprise would either bow to a peace or break in itself," (Works VI. 6g). And surely the prosaic "manner" is very characteristic: — the romance and passion of Romeo and Juliet is interrupted in much the same way by Friar Laurence, in his soliloquy on plants and their uses. R. G. White has an interesting discussion on this very matter, — the prosaic, didactic passages which intrude themselves into some of the most poetic scenes, — and he very pertinently asks. Where shall we stop, if we begin to mutilate Shakespeare for this reason ? These dry, almost pedagogic utterances supply instances of what Vernon Lee calls "Baconian thoughts in Baconian language," and doubtless the critics would make a present of them to Bacon, if they could do so " without prejudice." These ponderous discourses belong to the prosaic side of Bacon's nature, which is all that many critics 70 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. can see ; for them he is a plodding, note-taking pedant and nothing more. For Baconians it is satisfactory to find that he does not always cast away his scholastic robe, even when writing poetry ; and even when his style is most ponderous, in his prose works, he is not to be mistaken for anything but the Chancellor of Parnassus. But these critical cavils are of minor interest, and our study suffers arrest by their intrusion. Let us now see how Shakespeare uses the same sentiment. In Pericles, Cleon, the Governor of Tharsus, when the city is being desolated by famine, says to his queen, My Dionyza, shall we rest us here, And by relating tales of others' griefs See if 'twill teach us to forget our own. {Per. 1. iv. i). Richard II. in the agony of his despair makes a similar suggestion, Of comfort no man speak . . . For God's sake, let us sit upon the ground And tell sad stories of the death of Kings. {RicIi.II.lU.n. 144; 155). In the Tempest the same kind of comfort from remem- brance that others suffer in the same way is expressed, but in a manner that is more easily paralleled with other poets. Gonzalo says to Alonso, in order to comfort him, after the shipwreck, in which not only the ship, but, as he sup- poses, his son, are destroyed : — Beseech you, sir, be merry ; you have cause, So have we all, of joy ; for our escape Is much beyond our loss. Our hint of woe Is common ; every day some sailor's wife. The masters of some merchant, and the merchant. Have just our theme of woe ; but for the miracle, I mean our preservation, few in millions Can speak like us: then wisely, good sir, weigh Our sorrow with our comfort. {Temp. II. i. i — 9), TENNYSON AND SHAKESPEARE CONTRASTED. 7I Tennyson refers to this same source of consolation, but, unlike Bacon, he refuses to accept it : — That loss is common does not make My own less bitter, rather more: Too common: never morning wore To evening but some heart did l^reak. [In Mem. vi.). The contrast between Shakespeare and Tennyson shews how the individuality of Shakespeare expresses itself, and makes his musing something apart and characteristic. Shakespeare makes Gonzalo appropriate the consolation : Tennyson rejects it. The reason is that Shakespeare has a philosophical mortgage on the sentiment, which puts it to a special and a different use from that which Tennyson finds in it. Bacon has, so to speak, ear-marked the senti- ment, and set it aside for a distinct purpose. A still more striking instance will be found in Henry V. — more strikmg, I say, because the dramatic situation does not suggest any need of making use of the imagination in order to conjure up companions in misfortune. The King, the night before the battle of Agincourt, visits his army, that he may hearten them by his presence and courage. He finds old Sir Thomas Erpingham, who by reason of age and infirmity might have been justified in avoiding field duty, and this dialogue ensues : — Good morrow, old Sir Thomas Erpingham ! A good soft pillow for that good white head Were better than a churlish turf of France. Erp. — Not so, my liege; this lodging likes me better, Since I may say, " Now lie I like a King." K. Hen. — 'Tis good for men to love their present pains Upon example; so the spirit is eased; And when the mind is quickened, out of doubt. The organs, though defunct and dead before, Break up their drowsy grave, and newly move. With casted slough and fresh legerity. {Hen. V. IV. i. 13). 72 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. This is quite as prosaic as the rejected passage in Lear, and quite as Shakespearean. The reflection is very subtle and philosophic; the comfort suggested is strange, and could only have occurred to one who had mused in a similar way before, and could amplify and vary the applica- tion of an idea which he had often used in a more direct and immediate way. This unexpected introduction of an apparently inapplicable sentiment is curiously illustrated by its singularly fanciful and almost distorted application to a case in which the fellowship in woe suggested is of a grotesque and impossible character. Juliet, when she hears that Romeo is banished for the slaughter of Tybalt, exclaims : — " Tybalt is dead and Romeo banished ! " That — " banished " — that one word " banished " Hath slain ten thousand Tybalts. Tybalt's death Was woe enough, if it had ended there : Or, if sour woe delights in fellowship, And necdly will be rank'd iviili other griefs, Why follow'd not, when she said, " Tybalt's dead," Thy father, or thy mother, nay, or both. Which modern lamentation might have moved ? {Rom. -Jul. III. ii. 112). This is indeed a singular flight of fancy for a weeping bride. It is not a natural reflection suggested by her own case; it is evidently, and expressly, an imported sentiment, derived from experience of an entirely different character, and only related to the actual case by deep metaphysical analogy. As a part of the dramatic presentment it is justi- fied — 'if such a lovely outburst of passionate wailing needs justification — by the principle that the dramatic poet is allowed to be the interpreter of the dim, half-realised, quite inarticulate throbs of feeling that lie hidden in the depths of the soul, incapable of shaping themselves, for the sufferer himself, in any form of distinct utterance. The poet can see, the distracted girl can vaguely feel, that her extravagant lamentations over the banishment of her lover \ FANCIFUL ILLUSTRATIONS. 'J'^ would have been toned down into more restrained expres- sion, if it could have been brought into comparison with other types of sorrow. This feature of Juliet's violent, unregulated grief brings it into relation with the psychologic truth which she expresses in words coloured by her own resentful sorrow : "Sour woe delights in fellowship, and needly will be ranked with other griefs." But evidently the perception of this psychologic law has arisen out of a larger induction than this situation can supply; for its reasoned exposition it requires some such language as Bacon employed in his letter to Bishop Andrews. It is strange that this induction should have been made so early in his life— as if to pre- pare him for the sad tragedy of his later years. The same sentiment finds its place in comedy as well as tragedy. Armado, the fantastical Spaniard, in love with the peasant girl, in his agitation asks Moth, the lively page, to gwQ^ him this singular comfort: — Arm. — Comfort me, boy ! What great men have been in love ? Moth. — Hercules, master. Ann. — Most sweet Hercules ! More authority, dear boy ; name more, and let them be men of good repute and carriage. After other authorities have been quoted, Armado adds : — I will have that subject newly writ o'er, that I may example my digression by some might}^ precedent. {Love's Laboiir''s Lostl. ii. 67; 120). Another amusing application is given in the play by Dumain, who, rather ashamed of himself for falling in love, wishes that his companions might keep him in countenance by following his example : — O would the King, Biron and Longaville, Were lovers too ! Ill to example ill Would from my forehead wipe a perjured note, For none offend where all alike do dote. Longaville [advancing]. — Dumain, thy love is far from charity, That in love's grief desir'st society. {lb. IV. iii. 123). 74 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. The banished Duke, in As You Like It, finds similar consolation : — Thou sce'st we are not all alone unhappy ; This wide and universal theatre Presents more woeful pageants than tlic scene Wherein we plav in. {As You Like It II. vii. 136). But the natural place for the sentiment is tragedy. One of the most curious illustrations of its use is to be found in Richard II's sohloquy when confined in Pomfret Castle. In his solitude and desolation he seeks to "people this little world " with creatures of his own imagination : and when he has thus dramatized many of his thoughts, the inevitable moral of solitary grief finds its expression : — Thoughts tending to content flatter themselves That they are not the first of fortune's slaves, Nor shall not be the last ; like silly beggars, Who, sitting in the stocks, refuge their shame. That many have and others must sit there ; And in this thought they find a kind of ease, Bearing their own misfortunes on the back Of such as have before endured the like. (See Rich. II. V. v. i — 30). Leontes, maddened by jealousy, comforts himself, in his shameful agitation, by the thought that other husbands have been as unfortunate as he. The passage is somewhat unsavoury : see Winter's Tale, I. ii. igo — 207. The Baconian method of summoning up a crowd of instances in order to sustain the mind in patient endurance, is most characteristically exemplified in the case of the Duke of Suffolk, who has been captured by ruffians, who take his life. He sees the fate that is impending and comforts himself by the following curious use of historic imagmation. Come soldiers, shew what cruelty you can, That this my death may never be forgot ! Great men oft die by vile Bezonians ; GRIEF SEEKS THE COMPANY OF GRIEF. 75 A Roman sworder and banditto slave Murder'd sweet Tulh' ; Brutus' bastard hand Stabb'd Julius Cassar ; savage islanders Pompey the Great ; and Suffolk dies by pirates. (2 Hen. VI. IV. i. 132). The poem of Lucrece supplies illustrations of the same sentiment. Lucretia in her agony calls up various pictures of imaginary woe to sustain her. The philosophy of this comfort is present to her mind ; — So should I have co-partners of my pain ; And fellowship in woe doth woe assuage, As palmers' chat makes short their pilgrimage. {Lticnxc 789J. This line is a reflection of a Pronius entry. Bacon in his notes for composition makes the following entry. Varioque viam sermone levabat, No. 1015 : a Virgilian reminiscence. Two other Promus notes refer to the same philosophy of comfort : 454 and 945. Lucrece dwells with sympathetic fellowship on the images of woe painted by a "conceited painter," whose subject is the Trojan War. The time thus spent with "painted images" is a time of comparative relief. Being from the feeling of her own grief brought By deep surmise of others' detriment. Losing her woes in shows of discontent. It easeth som^e, though none it ever cured, To think their doulour others have endured. (Lucrece 1578J. She finds no comfort but only added pain in the natural symbols of joy : The little birds that tune their morning's joy Make her moans mad with their sweet melody ; For mirth doth search the bottom of annoy ; Sad souls are slain in merry compan}' ; Grief best is pleased with grief"s society : True sorrow then is feelingly sufficed When with like semblance it is sympathized. {Lucrece 1107). 76 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. The two lines quoted above (1580-81). It cascth some, etc., are evidently a translation of a Latin proverb which is found in Marlowe's FausUis, published in 1604, ten years after the appearance of Lncrcce. Solamen miseris socios habiiissc doloris. No one has, I believe, traced this motto to any classic author : it was probably invented by the author of Faiistus. How it came to appear in Lticrece is an enigma which awaits its solution. It is, however, worthy of note, that Marlowe is the only other poet, so far as I know, who is accustomed to this kind of exercise of the historic imagination. The typical expression of it cannot be better exhibited than in a passage in Edward II. The king finds himself embroiled with his great nobles in consequence of his passionate attachment to his favourite, Gaveston. He at once excuses his attachment, and comforts himself in the troubles which it brings, by reflec- tions of this character : — The mightiest Kings have had their minions : Great Alexander loved Hephasstion ; The conquering Hercules for Hylas wept : And for Patroclus stern Acliilles droop'd : And not kings onh', but the wisest men : The Roman TuUy lov'd Octavius ; Grave Socrates, wild Alcibiades. {Echvard II. I. iv. 390). These lines come surely from the same pen as that which wrote Suffolk's soliloquy before his assassination. It is one of those passages in Marlowe which forced Mr. J. Russell Lowell to exclaim, — " Surely one might fancy that to be from the prentice hand of Shakespeare. It is no small distinction that this can be said of Marlowe, for it can be said of no other." It seems to me that an analogous contact with Bacon may be traced. The same mental attitude is seen as in the letter to Bishop Andrews. And it is somewhat significant that Alexander's strong affection for Hephsestion is referred to by Bacon in his "Advance- ment," (Works HI. 310) ; and that the Promiis has a note (No. 785) referring to the passion of Hercules for Hylas. THE SENTIMENT EXTENDED. "JJ We may compare the above passage from Edward 11. with the following from Bacon's Essay of " Friendship " :— " It is a strange thing to observe how high a rate great kings and monarchs set upon this fruit of friendship whereof we speak : so great as they purchase it many times at the hazard of their own safety and greatness. . . . And we see plainly that this hath been done, not b}' weak and passionate princes only, but by the wisest and most politic that ever reigned." Bacon does not name the instances that were doubtless present to his mind : he knew that he had done so in his play of Edward II. Bacon's use and extended application of this sentiment is quite as remarkable as Shakespeare's. When the King was overwhelmed with debt, and found a difficulty in obtaining from Parliament the necessary supplies, Bacon suggests for his comfort ; " Sure I am, nil novi accidit vobis. It is no new thing for the greatest kings to be in debt; and if a man shall parvis coniponere magna, I have seen an Earl of Leicester, a Chancellor Hatton, an Earl of Essex, and an Earl of Salisbury, all in debt ; and yet it was no manner of diminution to their power or great- ness." ("Life," IV. 313). In the speech against enclosures, he probably pursued the same line of thought, for in the " Meagre and obviously inaccurate report," which is all that Mr. Spedding can produce, Bacon says, referring to the overflow of popula- tion in one place causing shrinking in another, "These two mischiefs, though they be exceeding great, yet they seem the less, because Qnce mala cum multis patimur leviora videntur." ("Life," II. 82). Again he uses the same philosophic comfort to extenuate the misfortune of the Queen being unwedded and child- less : — "Let them leave children that leave no other memory in their times. Brutorum cEternitas sobolcs. Revolve in histories the memories of happy men, and you shall not find any of rare felicity, but either he died child- less, or his line spent soon after his death, or else he was 78 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. unfortunate in his children. Should a man have them to be slain by his vassals, as the posthuuius of Alexander the Great was ? or to call them his imposthumes as Augustus Caesar called his? Peruse the catalogue! Cornelius Sylla ; Julius Caesar ; Flavins Vespasianus ; Severus ; Constantine the Great; and many more." (" Life," I. 140). So much was it the habit of Bacon's mind to dwell on this sentiment, that it turns up in most unexpected places. Thus, in discoursing on the revival of classic learning which was coincident with the Reformation, he thus con- nects the two events: — "Martin Luther, conducted no doubt by a higher Providence . , . finding his own soHtude being no ways aided by the opinions of his own time, was enforced to awake all antiquity, and to call former times to his succours, to make a party against the present time. So that the ancient authors, both in divinity and humanity, which had long slept in libraries, began generally to be read and revolved " ("Adv." Works, IH. 282). It may be said that the sentiment thus copiously illus- trated is a commonplace for all time. In its crudest statement this may be the case. The current and more usual form is beautifully expressed in Bacon's Essay of *' Friendship : " "There is no man that imparteth his joys to his friend, but he joyeth the more : and no man that imparteth his griefs to his friend, but he grieveth the less." It is, however, one note of genius that when it lights on a current sentiment, the idea is ennobled, amplified, framed in new settings, it receives the stamp and shrine of majesty and gains new lustre and significance. Bacon took this sentiment out of its isolation and by linking it to his historic and dramatic imagination, re-created it. It is a most singular and unprecedented comfort which Bacon finds in his griefs. He is, as it were, in banishment, but instead of surrendering himself to his sorrow and idly bewailing his misfortune, his mental activity is directed into a new channel ; he sets to work to explore the country in which he is doomed to sojourn ; he sets it in Shakespeare's fancies and bacon's facts. 79 his "Study of Imagination," he surveys its extent, observes its inhabitants, and marks all their circumstances, conditions and occupations. This sort of solace seems too fanciful to be of much practical use. These fantastic dreams, we think, will surely melt away before genuine misfortune, we never expect to see any one, except in melo- drama, "sit upon the ground and tell sad stories of the death of kings." And yet we find the fallen statesman, on whom Fortune has dealt her heaviest blows, sitting in his study and telling sad stories of the fall of statesmen, "bearing his own misfortunes on the back of such as have before endured the like." It is a striking and most unex- pected commentary on the dramatic situation. The moral of it is, not to be too hasty in assuming that these dramatic scenes are only "high fantastical." Bacon's life puts new meaning into Shakespeare's art, and brings his most peculiar fancies into the hard highway of human experience. 80 CHAPTER VI. THE PHILOSOPHY OF WONDER. Bacon's " Philosophy of Wonder" is expounded in several of his works, and it is in its full expression something quite original and peculiar to himself, although its origin may be partly found in Plato, Dr. Martineau, in his " Types of Ethical Theory " (Vol. 11. p. 140), affirms that the assumption of Plato that Wonder is the primitive intellectual impulse, has perhaps its most emphatic expres- sion in his Thesetetus, 155 D : where he says, " Wonder is the special affection of a philosopher ; for philosophy has no other starting point than this ; and it is a happy genealogy which makes Iris the daughter of Thaumas," i.e. adds Martineau, "which treats the messenger of the gods, the winged thought that passes to and fro between heaven and earth, and brings them into communion, as the child of Wonder. Aristotle, in his more prosaic way, makes the same assumption in his 'Metaphysics,' I. 2." Bacon has nowhere given us a psychological system : there are numerous discussions on isolated psychologic questions scattered through his philosophical works, but no general scheme. Like Plato, he considers that philosophy starts from wonder. He has a Promus note (No. 227), super mirari ccEperimt philosophari: after wondering, men began to philosophize : when wonder ceases, knowledge begins : a motto which is quoted, with humourous appli- cation, in a letter to Mr. Cawfielde : "Life," II. 373. So tar as the knowlege of God is concerned, wonder never ceases, this knowledge cannot be attained by the contem- plation of created things. "It is true that the contempla- WONDER PRECEDES KNOWLEDGE. 8l tion of the creatures of God hath for End (as to the natures of the creatures themselves) knowledge but as to the nature of God, no knowledge, but wonder, which is nothing else but contemplation broken off, or losing itself" Val. Ter. (Works, III. 218). In the "Advancement," he speaks in the same way, that " wonder is the seed of know- ledge," "wonder is broken knowledge" (Works, III. 266, 267). So that wonder recedes, as knowledge advances, wonder is antecedent — the essential starting point, which is left behind when the start has been made. Bacon generally refers to admiration, or wonder — for the two words are identical, admiratio being the Latin for wonder, — as implying a suspension of intellectual activity under the spell of emotion. Thus he speaks of Queen Elizabeth's skill in languages, by which, "She is able to negotiate with divers ambassadors in their own languages : and that with no small disadvantage unto them, who, I think, can- not but have a great part of their wits distracted from their matters in hand, to the contemplation and admiration of such perfections" ("Life," I. 139). Knowledge, Bacon says, comes by comparison of similar things, " there is no proceeding in invention of knowledge but by similitude." Consequently wonder arises when the object contemplated cannot be brought into this relation with anything else; ex. gr., "God is only self-like, having nothing in common with any creature" (Works, III. 218). And from this follows an extension of the theory of wonder which is Bacon's most characteristic thought. The mere fact that anything is unique, not related by simihtude to anything else, although this is the special occasion for wonder, yet it does not occasion wonder, unless it is also rare : if it is familiar, wonder does not arise. As there are miracles of nature, so there are miracles of art of which " a collection or particular history " should be made. But not only of "such masterpieces and mysteries of any art which excite wonder." "For wonder is the child of rarity ; and if a thing be rare, though in kind it be no way 82 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. extraordinary, yet it is wondered at. While, on the other hand, things which really call for wonder on account of the difference in species which they exhibit as compared with other species, yet if we have them by us in comm.on use, are but slightly noticed." " Among the singularities of nature, I place the sun, the moon, the magnet, and the like, things in fact most familiar, but in nature almost unique" {Nov. Org. II. 31). It is essential to observe that in Bacon's Latin, admiratio is the word for wonder : Admiratio est proles raritatis ; and we see that as what is rare is the occasion for wonder, so what is common, or familiar, dispels it. Wonder is the sentiment appropriate to miracles, which are a species of monodica, singularities either of nature or art. And by the contemplation of " rare and extraordinary works of nature," or " excellent and wonderful works of art," " the mind is excited and raised to the investigation and discovery of Forms capable of including them," one of the principal aims of science being the investigation of Forms : when the Form of a thing is known, its cause is known. And, says Bacon, " Causarum explicatio tollit miraculum " {Nov. Org. I. 70) : Explanation of causes takes off, or removes, the marvel. Miracles and wonders are, in Bacon's view, phenomena whose cause is not known. Thus, the Second Counsellor in the Gcsta Grayortim concludes his speech as follows :— " When your Excellency shall have added depth of knowledge to the fineness of your spirits and greatness of your power, then indeed shall you be a Trismegistus ; and then, when all other miracles and wonders shall cease, by reason that you shall have dis- covered their natural causes, yourself shall be left, the only miracle and wonder of the world." (" Life" I. 335). Bacon concludes one of his letters to King James with this courtly compliment : — "Miracles are ceased, though admiration will not cease while you live." ("Life "VI. 140). The whole of this philosophy of wonder is most curiously, most exactly reproduced in Shakespeare. The identity WONDER AND ADMIRATION EQUIVALENT. 83 between the two is at once suggested by the observation that Shakespeare habitually uses the Latin word admiratio, in its English form, as the synonym for wonder, as will be evident in many of the passages to be quoted. At present I may refer to such passages as the following : — In Cranmer's prophecy relating to Elizabeth and James, in Henry VIIL, he uses the following singular language : Nor shall this peace sleep with her : but as when The bird of wonder dies, — the maiden Phcenix, — Her ashes new create anotlier heir, As great in admiration as herself. [Hen. VIIL V. v. 40). Note here that the bird of wonder is the unique bird, the rarit)'', the singularity of nature, the Phoenix. A similar reference to the Phoenix occurs in Cymheline : If she be furnished with a mind so rare, She is alone the Arabian bird. {Cymb. I. vi. 16). The discovery of Perdita is described with the same variation of language : " The changes I perceived in the King and Camillo were very notes of admiration . . . di notable passion of wonder a.ppea.red in them," {Winter's Tale, V. ii. 11). In Cymheline "a mark of wonder" is used for purposes •of identification ; and the phrase can be so used, because the mark is something rare or unique : Guiderius had Upon his neck a mole, a sanguine star : It was a mark of wonder. {Cyiub. V. V. 365^ Why a mole should be called a mark of wonder can only be explained by Bacon's philosophy. That wonder is the vestibule of knowledge — the senti- ment that is left when we pass beyond the porch and •enter the dwelling — is clearly, though not copiously, 84 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. expressed in the dramas. In the interior masque of the Midsiniimcr Nighfs Dream (V. i. 128) we find, Gentles, perchance you wonder at this show : But wonder on, iill initli makes all fliini^s plain. Tlie same philosophical idea is expressed, rather cum- brously, in Hymen's Hymn : While's a wedlock hymn we sing, Feed yourselves with qiieslioning, That reason wonder inav diniinisi/. {As Yon Like It, V. iv. 143). The dissipation of wonder by the advent of knowledge is curiously referred to in the following, where also wonder and admiration are synonymous terms : — Bring in the admiration ; that we, with thee, May spend our wonder too; or take ojf thine By wondering how thou took'st it. {All's Well, II. i. 91). The whole idea, and especially the remarkable expression, take off thy wonder, seems to me a reflection of the Latin explicatio causarum tollit miraculum : evidently some reasonable explanation is the leverage which takes off ( tollit) the wonder to which the speaker refers. So again in Hamlet, when the rare, almost miraculous,, visit of the Ghost is referred to, Horatio says, — Season your admiration for a while, With an attenl ear, till I may deliver, Upon the witness of these gentlemen, Tliis marvel to you. {Hamlet, I. ii. 192). It is worth noting that the quarto (1604) edition has the word wonder, instead of marvel, in this passage. That wonder is the seed of knowledge, is implied in all these passages. That it is broken knowledge is expressed in many ways : especially by connecting silence, or hesi- tating, uncertain speech, with wonder. Thus, Paulina,. WONDER AND SILENCE. 85 before the supposed statue of Hermione, says to the dumb, wonder-strickeu onlookers, " I like your silence : it the more shows off your wonder," {Winter's Tale. V. iii. 21). So, Bacon begins his discourse in praise of knowledge with, "Silence were the best celebration of that which I mean to commend : " an axiom which has some affinity with Paulina's sentiment, in which silence is connected with broken knowledge. The same idea is expressed by Claudio : " Silence is the perfectest herald of joy: I were but little happy, if I could say how much." {Much Ado about Nothing, II. i. 317). Benedict uses the same philosophical aphorism : — For my part I am so attired in wonder, I know not -ivhat to say. (M. Ado, IV. i. 146.) The same connection between silence and wonder is implied in Hamlet's reference to Laertes : — What is he whose grief Bears such an emphasis ? whose phrase of sorrow Conjures the wandering stars, and makes them stand Like wondcr-ivoundcci licarcrs ? {Ham. V. i. 277.) And in the Sonnets we find silence and wonder thus con- nected : — For we, which now behold these present days, Have eyes to wonder, but lack tongues to praise. fSonnet 106 j. The same arrest of speech and reflection by wonder is referred to by Prospero, the ruler of the enchanted island, the worker of miracles and prodigies : I perceive these lords At this encounter do so mucli admire Tliat tlicy devour tlieir reason, and scarce tliink Tlieir eyes do offices of trull!, their words Are natural breath. (Temp. V. i. 153;. 86 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. The silence which may be paradoxically called the expres- sion of wonder, — mute wonder, — is excellently pictured in the account of Henry V's eloquence : — When he speaks, The air, a chartered libertine, is still, And the mute wonder lurketh in men's ears, To steal his sweet and honeyed sentences. (Hen. F. I. i. 47 j. This passage becomes much more intelligible when collated with the passage we have quoted from Bacon, referring to the eloquent discourse of Queen Elizabeth, and the mute wonder which held her ambassadors spell-bound in her presence. Bacon's philosophy is the key to all these passages. Henry and Elizabeth are eloquent in the same way. In the passages already quoted the object of wonder is always something rare and unique, although this quality is not always pointed out. It is, however, often indicated. An extraordinary, almost miraculous cure is, in AlVs Well, (II., iii. 7), called "the rarest argument of wonder.'''^ Bacon says, we have seen, that what is rare is wondered at ; and what is in common tise, or familiar, is not wondered at, even if it be unique, and that when philosophy or knowledge enters, wonder retreats. This philosophical placitum cannot be better expressed than in the words in AlVs Well immediately precedmg : — "They say miracles are past : and we have our philoso- phical persons to make modern [modern always in Shake- speare means common or ordinary] and familiar, things supernatural and causeless. Hence it is we make trifles of terrors, ensconcing ourselves into seeming knowledge, when we should submit ourselves to an unknown fear. Why 'tis the rarest argument of wonder that hath shot out in our latter times." This passage teems with Baconian thought ; it is a particular application of the maxim caiisarum explicatio tollit miraculum. The philosophical teaching implied in this very Baconian THINGS CAUSELESS. 87 speech in the play is exactly reproduced in the Novum Organiiin, 11. 28. And the curious use of the word causeless is anticipated and completely vindicated. Bacon is discussing what he calls Singular Instances, i.e., instances "which are like themselves alone." And on these he makes the following deeply wise and philosophical comments. I give Professor Fowler's translation : — ''The use of Singular Instances is the same as that of the Clandestine Instances, namely, to unite and extend the limits of nature, for the purpose of discovering general or common natures, to be afterwards limited by true differences. For we are not to desist from enquiry till the properties and qualities which are found in such things as may be taken for marvels of nature [pro miraculis natures] be reduced and comprehended under some Form or Law ; so that all irregularity or singularity shall be found to depend on some common Form, and the Marvel [miraculum] shall turn out to be only in the precise differences and the degree and the rare concurrence [concurso raro] and not in the species itself. Whereas now the thoughts of men go no further than to regard such things as the secrets and mighty works [uiagnalia^ of nature, and as it were uncaused [secrctis incausahilibus'] and as exceptions to general rules." We can, by help of Bacon's philosophy, see why causeless, and supernatural, are connected with what is miraculous or not familiar. We have seen in the speech of the Second Counsellor at the Gesta Grayorum how the two are connected : " Miracles and wonders shall cease, by reason that you have discovered their natural causes." It is not often that philosophical technicalities are so copiously presented in Shakespeare : in these writings indeed there is plenty of philosophy, but it is usually fluid or molten, not shaped : incorporated with the dramatic situation, not formulated as a detached commentary. The same principles are latently present in other passages. 88 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. When Hero returns to life as if by resurrection, the friar, who has planned the entire incident, entreats the company to suspend their amazement till the marriage is solemnized, and that they may not be too much influenced by the apparent miracle, he suggests that it should be regarded with the seeming knowledge which emancipates from an unknown fear. Meanwhile, let ivonder seem familiar, And to the chapel let us presently. \m. Ado V. iv. 70.) The words — let wonder seem familiar — are almost un- intelligible till interpretation is supplied by Baconian philosophy. That wonder and what is rare or unique are associated, is constantly implied. In the Tempest the unique specimen of womankind found in the enchanted island is named Miranda, which Ferdinand translates — Admired Miranda. Indeed the top of admiration ! worth What's dearest in the world. [Temp. III. i. 37). " What's dearest," is doubtless a variation of what's rarest ; dear being one of those words which is occasionally used in almost a technical way, when the philosophy of wonder colours its application. The same use of the word is found in the 102nd Sonnet — Sweets, grown common, lose their dear delight. The whole Sonnet, one of the loveliest ever penned, is full of the philosophical subtlety connected with rarity. "Rarity" might be its title. ''The top of admiration" recalls Bacon's demands that the tops, or ultimates, or summitates of human nature should be studied. (Dc Aug. IV. i.). Ferdinand finds other arguments of wonder in the strange island, and rarity is curiously dragged in b}^ a poetic strain on language which would be insufferably MONODICA NATURE. 89 awkward in prose, but in poetrj^ it brings to the philosophi- cal sentiment an atmosphere of quaintness and subtlety, — Let me live here ever : So rare a wondcr'd Father and a Wife Makes this place Paradise. {Temp. IV. i. 122). Even the mention of Paradise keeps up the impression of what is rare, or unique. The passage just quoted is an instance in which language which is impossible for prose, becomes highly picturesque and expressive in verse, and at the same time brings into poetry the flavour of philosophy. In other passages this strained language is used to bring philosophical vigour into dramatic utterance. For instance, lachimo, speaking of the good qualities of Posthumus, as but the riper develop- ments of what he knew long before, says, " But I could then have looked on him without the help of admiration," {Cymb. I. iv. 4), which Bacon's philosophy enables us to explain, i.e., there was then nothing unusual, or unique, or rare, or exceptional in his character, nothing to make me incapable of judging him calmly, rationally, by comparison with similar natures : he was no argument of wonder then, he ranked with common and familiar facts. Wonder is in Shakespeare, as in Bacon, constantly associated with the monodica naturcB, comets, or the sun when covered by clouds, and so withdrawn from ordinary observation. Petruchio, when he appears at the bridal party dressed in beggarly costume, rebukes the company who are scandalized by his appearance, — Wherefore gaze this goodly company, As if they saw some wondrous monument, Some comet, or unusual prodigy ? {Tarn. Sltrciv III. ii. 95). t.e., something to be regarded with speechless amazement. Still more remarkable is the comment of Henry V. on the strange monstrous crime of Lord Scroop, as something 90 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. rare, unique— causeless, or inexplicable as if causeless— a sort of monodicum sceleris, a singularity in crime, a matter for wonder, not for explicatio causarum — 'Tis so strange, That, though the truth of it stands off as gross As black and white, my eye will scarcely see it. Treason and murder ever kept together As two yoke-devils sworn to cither's purpose. Working so grossly, in a natural cause, Tliat admiration did notwlioop at tlicni : But thou, 'gainst all fropoition, did'st bring in Wonder to wait on treason and on murder, {Hen. V. II. ii. 102). Here again Baconian philosophy is strangely evident. Wonder — or admiration, — (for again the words are inter- changed) does not arise till no natural cause can be dis- covered ; the crime is inexplicable, not to be explained by similitude or comparison, ('gainst all proportion), so entirely inexplicable that reason is silent, and admiration can only vent itself in an inarticulate cry, whooping not speaking. That whooping, the inarticulate cry which is all that wonder is capable of, is a word technically used in this sense, is illustrated by the following very curious passage : — Celia is the speaker; she is tantalizing Rosalind in reference to the verses which Orlando has been scatter- ing about the forest : — " O wonderful, wonderful, and most wonderful, wonderful ! and yet again wonderful ; and after that, out of all whooping! " {As You Like Itlll. ii. 201.) This is a whooping speech — a reduplicated exclamation, its best substitute for coherent utterance, — and the occasion for it is wonder, or admiration. In accordance with the same philosophy, the wild young Prince Hal, justifies his loose behaviour : he is preparing a surprise, a wonder for the world : The justification is somewhat sophistical : — Yet herein will I imitate the sun, Who doth permit the base contagious clouds WONDER AND RARITY. QI To smother up his beauty from the world, That when he please again to be himself, Being wanted, lie may be more iivndei'd at, By breaking through the foul and ugly mists Of vapours that did seem to strangle him. If all the year were playing holidays. To sport would be as tedious as to work, But when they seldom come, they wish'd for come, And nothing pleaseth but rare accidents. (i Hen. IV. I.ii. 221). In this passage the occasion for wonder is entirely fantastic and unreal, and it is therefore all the more worthy of remark that the poet is careful to define the condition on which wonder rests : no cause but rarity can be assigned for it. The sun is not wondered at till he has been hidden, and becomes rare and wanted : his return awakens wonder. Wonder is more natural to the ignorant and unreflective common folk, whom, I am sorry to say, Shakespeare, with his aristocratic sympathies, thoroughl}- despised. He remarks of them that nothing pleases which does not fit into their natural humour of wonder — rare accidents. Bacon also observes Nihil enini inultis placet nisi imaginationcni feriat. {Nov. Org. I. yy). Nothing pleases the multitude unless it strikes their imagination. With this passage we may compare one in the 52nd Sonnet, in which Bacon's wonder-philosophy is clearly reflected : — Therefore are feasts so solemn and so rare, Since seldom coming, in the long year set, Like stones of worth they tliinty placed are, Or captain jewels in the carcanet. If, however, we would see Bacon's philosophy of wonder, in its larger applications, most luminously expressed, we shall find it in Henry IV's remonstrances addressed to this same wild young Prince, for making himself so common and so cheap — casting aside the veil of majesty which should al\va3'S surround, and half conceal 92 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. royalty, and so forfeiting the wonder and admiration which Princes only keep when they are secluded from their subjects, rarely seen, and when seen, admired. Opinion, or reputation, for Princes, can only rest securely on this basis of wonder. Had I so lavish of my presence been, So commou-hackncy'd in the eyes of men, So stale and cheap io vulgar company, Opinion, that did help me to the crown. Had still kept loyal to possession, And left me in reputeless banishment, A fellow of no mark nor likelihood. By being seldom seen, I could not stir But like a comet I was wonder' d at, . . . Thus did I keep my person fresh and new ; My presence, like a robe pontifical, Ne'er seen but wonder'd at : and so my state, Seldom but sumptuous, showed like a feast. And won by rareness such solemnity. The skipping king, he ambled up and down . . . Grew a companion to the common streets, Enfeoff'd himself to popularity ; That, being daily swallow'd by men's eyes, They surfeited with honey and began To loathe the taste of sweetness, whereof a little More than a little is by much too much. So when he had occasion to be seen. He was but as the cuckoo is in June, Heard, not regarded ; seen, but with such eyes. As, sick and blunted with community. Afford no extraordinary gaze. Such as is bent on sun-like majesty. When it shines seldom, in admiring eves. (i Hen. IV. U\. n. 39). It is clear that in such a paternal lecture as this the philosophy of wonder need not have been introduced. Its unexpected appearance, with the care taken to fit it to its unusual application, shews what a strong hold it had on the poet's mind, and how thoroughly it possessed his imagination. BACON S PHILOSOPHY IN SHAKESPEARE. 93 There are one or two verbal curiosities in this speech which it is worth while observing. The poet speaks of eyes as sick and blunted with connnunity. Common is one of the technical words in Bacon's philosophy of wonder : community is evidently a correlative and equivalent to familiarity. The place of this word in the philosophy of wonder must be remembered when it appears elsewhere^ as in the 69th Sonnet. But why thy odour matcheth not thy show, The solve is this, that thou dost common grow. Also, when we find Shakespeare using the striking expression, My presence, like a robe pontifical, — it is interesting to find that Bacon, in his charge against St. John, uses much the same expression — "You take upon you a pontifical habit, and you couple your slander with a curse." ("Life," V. 141). It is to be noted that Bacon's "Philosophy of Wonder and Rarity," with his reference to the sun, comets, &c., as illus- trations, was not published till 1620, four years after William Shakspere's death. Ho\v came " Shakespeare " to give such brilliant and ample expression to these ideas more than twenty years before ? How came all this very characteristic Baconian thought to find a place in these poems ? Evidently some explanation is urgently required. I might refer to other passages in Shakespeare which require to be interpreted by the light of Bacon's Philo- sophy of Wonder : but those which I have produced are, I submit, sufficient to prove that some of Bacon's most characteristic ideas find their best, their amplest expression, not in Bacon's prose, but in Shakespeare's poetry. The crude, technical, scientific exposition of the theory is to be found in the prose : while the larger and more varied applications of the theory, — the theory set in many lights and colours, as it is seen reflected in the multipljang and transforming mirror of a poet's mind, — is seen in Shake- 94 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. speare. But amidst all this kaleidescopic changes the individuality of the patient thinker, and that of the tuneful singer and inspired seer remains the same. In the prose the speaker keeps on the solid ground of science and philosophy, his wings are folded, and his harp is silent ; but in the poetry he carries the same thoughts into higher regions — he ascends the Empyrean, and the higher he ascends the more rapturous and musical is his strain, although he has brought his theme from the lower levels of philosophy. As the lark, so also is he. Type of the wise who soar, but never roam, True to the kindred points of heaven and home. 95 CHAPTER VII. BACON'S PHILOSOPHY OF HOPE. 1 DO not think that this chapter will be less valuable or less acceptable, because it will contain very little of my own. My object will be obtained if by the grouping and com- parison of various passages from Bacon and Shakespeare I can show in another striking instance how remarkably their ideas correspond. If I can do this both the prose and the poetry will be illustrated. The philosophy be- comes more poetical and the poetry more philosophical, as the two are brought together. Those who have raised the objection against the Baconian theory, that the Author of the Essay of " Love " could not have written, or even understood, the love scenes of Shakespeare, might with even greater plausi- bility have urged that the genial dramatic poet, who saw the world of men and nature always arrayed in the rich colouring and the radiant glow of poetry and imagination, cannot be the hard-headed, matter-of-facf, somewhat cynical statesman and philosopher, who dilated with such pitiless logic on the uselessness of Hope, and even con- tended that it is for men both delusive, mischievous, and injurious. In truth, Bacon's language about Hope is one of the most curious features of his philosophy, and startles even such a devoted admirer and sympathetic commentator as Mr. Spedding, In the preface to the Mcditationcs SacrcB Mr. Spedding refers especially to the meditation De Spe Terrestri, as a singular and characteristic sample of Bacon's outlook on life at the age of ^y, and thus comments upon it : — g6 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. "The aphorism attributed to HeracHtus that Dry light is the best soul* was indeed at all times a favourite with him." The use of the word watery may account for and explain its use in Shakespeare : — The imaginary relish is so sweet That it enchants my sense : what will it be When that the watery palate tastes indeed Love's thrice repured nectar ? (Tro. Cr. III. ii. 20). Bacon being accustomed to associate purity and dryness, thinks of that type of taste which is not accustomed to pure nectar as soft and watery. Spedding continues : — "But I do not think he has anywhere else made so resolute an attempt to translate it into a practical precept for the regulation of the mind, and fairly to follow to its legitimate consequences the doctrine that absolute veracity and freedom from all delusion is the only sound condition of the soul. Upon this principle a reasonable expectation of good to come founded upon a just estimate of proba- bilities, is the only kind of hope which in the things of this life a man is permitted to indulge ; all hope that goes beyond this being reserved for the life to come. The spirit of hope must have been strong in Bacon himself, if at the age of 37 he could still believe it possible for man to walk by the light of reason alone. I suppose it did not hold out much longer. His own experience must have taught him, that had he never hoped to do more than he succeeded in doing, he would never have had the spirit to proceed ; and that to reduce hope within the limits of reasonable expectation would be to abjure the possunt quia posse videntur, and to clip the wings of enterprise ; and he learned before he died to recommend the ' Entertaining of * Bacon often refers to dry light : i.e., knowledge which is a pure and accurate reflection of fact, not " infused or drenched " by the personal qualities of the mind that receives it. " This same lumen sicum," he says, " doth parch and offend most men's watery and soft natures." f" Advancement " II., xii. 2.j HOPE VERSUS VERACITY. 97 hopes,' as one of the best medicines for the preservation of health." Mr. Spedding refers to the Essay of "The Regimen of Health," originally published in 1597 (the same time as the Meditationes Sacrce) ; and again in 1612. But not till 1625 was the precept " Entertain hopes" included among those for the regulation of health. The whole subject is most interesting, and the Medita- tion, in which it is most amply expounded is worth reproducing, especially as we shall find that Bacon's very characteristic idea, in its scope and also in its limitations, is best represented by combining the didactic expositions of the Philosophy of Hope in the prose with Shakespeare's dramatic presentation of the same subject. Moreover, this special feature of Bacon's philosophy is very little known, and its remarkable coincidence with Shake- spearean thought has not, so far as I know, been noticed. The text for Bacon's Meditation, De Spe Terrcstri is, Melior est oculorum visio quam animi progressio : "Better is the sight of the eyes than the wandering of the desire." And the sermon which follows begins as follows : — "The sense, which takes everything simply as it is, makes a better mental condition and estate than those imaginations and wanderings of the mind. For it is the nature of the human mind, even in the gravest wits, the moment it receives an impression of anything, to sally forth and spring forward, and expect to find everything else in harmony with it ; if it be an impression of good, then it is prone to indefinite hope ; if of evil, to fear ; whence it is said, — " By her own tales is Hope full oft deceived. "And, on the other hand, — " In doubtful times Fear still forbodes the worst. " In fear however there is some advantage : it prepares endurance, and sharpens industry. H g8 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. " The task can show no face that's strange to me: Each chance I have pondered, and in thought rehearsed." So far there is nothing very starthng, and it is not surprising that we are on ground common also to Shake- speare. The resemblance is very exact. For Bacon's discourse at this point might be embellished with part of the dialogue between Troilus and Cressida (III. ii. 74). Tro. — Fear makes devils of cherubims, they never see truly. [and yet] Cres. — Blind fear, that seeing reason leads, finds safer footing than blind reason, stumbling without fear. To fear the worst oft cures the worse. And, in the lowest levels of misfortune the victim may say :— Yet better thus, and known to be contemn'd, Than still contemn'd and flatter'd. To be worst. The lowest and most dejected thing of fortune. Still stands in esperance, lives not in fear. The lamentable change is from the best : The worst returns to laughter. {Lear IV. i. i). Bacon continues his sermon; and now he surprises us: — " But in hope there seems to be no use. For what avails that anticipation of good ? If the good turns out less than you hoped for, good though it be, yet because it is not so good, it seems to you more like a loss than a gain, by reason of the over-hope. If neither more or less but so," — [an expression, it may be parenthetically noticed, which has a singular resemblance to Kent's language addressed to Cordelia {Lear IV. vii. 5) : — All my reports go with the modest truth: Nor more, nor clipp'd, but so. — "the event being equal and answerable to the hope, yet the flower of it having been by that hope already gathered, you find it a stale thing and almost distasteful. If the FALSE SECURITY RESTING ON HOPE. QQ good be beyond the hope, then no doubt there is a sense of gain. True; yet, had it not been better to gain the whole by hoping not at all, than the difference by hoping too little ? And such is the effect of hope in prosperity. But in adversity it enervates the true strength of the mind. For matter of hope cannot always be forthcoming; and if it fail, though but for a moment, the whole strength and support of the mind goes with it. Moreover, the mind suffers in dignity, when we endure evil only by self- deception and looking another way, and not by fortitude and judgment. And therefore it was an idle fiction of the poet's to make Hope the antidote of human diseases, because it mitigates the pain of them ; whereas it is in fact an inflammation and exasperation of them, rather multiplying and making them break out afresh. So it is nevertheless that most men give them- selves up entirely to imaginations of hope, and these wander- ings of the mind; and, thankless for the past, scarce attend- ing to the present, ever young, hang merel}/ upon the future. I beheld all that walk under the sun, with the next youth that shall rise after him, which is a sore disease and a great madness of the mind. You will ask, perhaps, if it be not better, when a man knows not what to expect, that he should ■divine well of the future, and rather hope than distrust, seeing that hope makes the mind more tranquil. Certainly in all delay and expectation, to keep the mind tranquil and steadfast, by the good government and composure of the same, I hold to be the chief firmament of human life; but such tranquillity as depends upon hope I reject, as light and unsure. Not but it is fit to foresee and pre-suppose upon sound and sober conjecture good things as well as evil, that we may the better fit our actions to the probable event; only this must be the work of the understanding and judg- ment, with a just inclination of the feeling. But who is there, whose hopes are so ordered, that when once he has concluded with himself out of a vigilant and steady <:onsideration of probabilities that better things are coming, 100 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES JN BACONIAN LIGHT. he has not dwelt upon the very anticipation of good, and indulged in that kind of thought as a pleasant dream ? And this it is which makes the mind light, frothy, un- equal, wandering. Therefore, all hope is to be employed upon the life to come in heaven; but here on earth by how much purer is the sense of things present, without in- fection or tincture of imagination, by so much wiser and better is the soul. Long hope to cherish in so short a span Beiits not man." The idle fiction of the poets here referred to is still further expounded in the discourse on Prometheus. Pan- dora is a fair and lovely woman, made by Vulcan, by order of Jupiter, in order to chastise the insolence of Prometheus. She carried an elegant vase in which were enclosed all mischief and calamities, only at the bottom was Hope. This was rejected b}^ Prometheus — the type of foresight — but accepted by his incautious brother, Epimetheus, the type of improvidence. His followers " amuse their minds with many empty hopes, m which they take delight, as in pleasant dreams, and so sweeten the miseries of life." All this is strange teaching, very logical, but very un- palatable. Hope must be restrained like iviagination: its anticipations are ^Hight and unsure; " it is allied to mad- ness; it raises pleasant dreams which sweeten life, but do not add to its strength and dignity. It keeps the mind steadfast, by the help of delusion. How does all this teaching look when it is applied to practice ? This may be seen in the debate held between certain lords who are plotting insurrection against the fourth Henry. The Archbishop of York begins : — Thus have you heard our cause and known our means; And, my most noble friends, I pray you all Speak plainly your opinion of our hopes. And then follows a comparison between their own forces and those of the King — giving grounds for hope derived MADNESS AND FLATTERY. lOI from the "understanding and judgment." Lord Bardolph discourages action that is prompted only by hope, and his counsel is that their movements must be exactly pro- portioned to their ability, not to their expectations : — For in a theme so bloody-faced as this Conjcciiirc, cxpcctaiioii, and surmise Of aids incertain, should not be admitted. Arch. — 'Tis ver}' true, Lord Bardolph; for indeed It was young Hotspur's case at Shrewsbury. L. Bard. — It was, my lord : who lined himself with hope, Ealing Ihe air on promise of suppl}', Flaticring himself in project of a power, Much smaller than the smallest of his thoughts. And so, wilh great imagination, Proper to madmen, led his powers to death, And winking \_i.c., with eyes shut — dreaming] leap'd into destruction. Here we find hope coupled with conjecture, surmise of aids uncertain (or unsure), with eating the air, flattery, imagination, and madness, and with eyes shut as in slumber — all Baconian points of view. The discussion, however, continues. Lord Hastings asks the same ques- tion that Bacon puts into the mouth of an objector, who wishes to know if it is not just as well to " divine well of the future : " — But b}^ your leave, it never yet did hurt To lay down likelihoods and forms of hope. *' Yes," replies Bardolph, vindicating the Baconian view — Yes; if this present quality of war, . . . Lives so in hope as in an early spring We see the appearing liuds; which to prove fruit, Hope gives not so much warrant, as despair That frosts will bite them. When we mean to build. We first survey the plot, then draw the model. (2 Hen. IV. I. iii.) And then follows a moralizing similar to the "counting 102 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. cost" of the Gospels— a "sound and sober conjecture" of probabilities. The same attitude is more briefly described by the soldiers, who are plotting revolution against Macbeth. Thoughts speculative their unsure hopes relate : But certain issue strokes must arbitrate. {Macbeth V. iv. 19.) Evidently in Shakespeare's opinion, the proper attitude of a warrior is to keep hope altogether subordinate, and out- side his calculations, following the guidance of reason and fact ; he takes counsel of judgment and understanding, not of hope. Hope is as unsuitable for him as for the condemned prisoner, who is exhorted by his priestly counsellor — Prepare yourself to death : do not satisfy your resolution with hopes that are fallible [Mens. M. III. i. 167.) The same teaching is shadowed in Agamemnon's speech to the Grecian warriors. He also declares that — The ample proposition that hope makes In all designs begun on earth below Fails in the promised largeness. Checks and disasters Grow in the veins of actions highest reared. {Tro. Cres. I. iii. 3.) And then follows a discourse of matchless wisdom, beauty, and eloquence on the lessons to be drawn from failure and difficulty Equally frail are the hopes built on royal or human favour. O momentary grace of mortal men, Which wc more hunt for than the grace of God ! Who builds his hopes in air of your good looks, Lives like a drunken sailor on a mast, Ready, with every nod, to tumble down Into the fatal bowels of the deep. {Richard III. III. iv. 98.) The treachery of hope is also implied in the following — Oft expectation fails ; and most oft there HOPE NOT FOR EARTH BUT HEAVEN. IO3 Where most it promises : and oft it hits Where hope is coldest, and despair most fits, {All's W. II. i. 145.) One of the baleful effects of witchcraft is the raising of hopes which are unreasonable. Macbeth was to be thus bewitched : — Magic sleights, Shall raise such artificial sprites. As by the strengtli of their illusion Shall draw him on to his confusion. He shall spurn fate, scorn death, and bear, His hopes 'bove wisdom, grace and fear : And you all know, security Is mortal's chiefest enemy. {Macbeth III. v 26.) Shakespeare as well as Bacon tells us that all hope that goes beyond reasonable calculation should refer to the life to come, not to the present stage of being. Comfort's in heaven, and we are on the earth, Where nothing lives but crosses, cares and griefs. {Richard III. II. ii. 78.) And accordingly the fallen statesman — Gave his honours to the world again. His blessed part to heaven, and slept in peace. {Henry VIII. IV. ii. 29.) This conception of Hope is fundamental in Bacon's writings ; but there are other sides worthy of con- templation. Hope, alt lough based on illusion, as long as it is cherished, gives support and tranquility to the mind ; this is one prime condition of physical health. Hence "Entertain Hopes," is one of the prescriptions of the Regiment of Health. Hope prolongs life, by keeping off the corrosion of despair. In this point of view, that of physical advantage. Bacon's language changes. No longer does he say, " In Hope there is no use ; " but, " Hope is of all affections the most useful, and contributes most to pro- long life, if it be not too often disappointed, but feed the 104 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. imagination with the prospect of good. They, therefore, who get up and propose some definite end as their mark in life, and continually and gradually advance thereto, are most!}' long-lived ; in so much that when they arrive at the summit of their hopes, and have nothing more to look forward to, they commonly droop, and do not long survive. So that hope appears to be a kind of leaf-joy, which may be spread out over a vast surface like gold " " Hist. Life and Death " (Works V. 279). Also discoursing on the "affections and passions of the mind, which are pre- judicial to longevity, and which are profitable," he says, " Ruminations of joy in the memory, or apprehensions of them in hope or imagination are good" {lb.). A French proverb in the Promus, 1472, reflects this sentiment, " Commence a mourir qui abandonne son desir " (He who forsakes the object of living — his desire — begins to die) ; a sentiment most poetically expressed in the Essay of " Death : " — the sweetest Canticle is Nunc dimittis, when a man hath attained worthy ends and expectations. Bacon's language, "feed the imagination with the prospect of good," is not unlike Shakespeare's, already quoted, in Hotspur, who Lined himself with hope, Eating the air in promise of supply, With great imagination, proper to madmen. Curiously enough precisely the same conception of hope is found in the first play of the Parnassus trilogy, " I fed so long upon hope till I had almost 'starved,'" i. 621. The leaf-joy view may be reflected in the lines, Their's [i.e. their travel] is sweetened with the hope to have The present benefit which I possess ; And hope to joy is little less in joy Than Hope cnjoy'd. {Rich. II. II. in. 15). in which the word-play, hope to joy, less in joy, hope enjoyed — is peculiarly Baconian. But perhaps the most remarkable of these correspon- PROLONGATION OF LIFE BY HOPE. IO5 dences in this part of the subject is that in which Bacon's idea of hope as prolonging hfe is repeated by Shakespeare. Richard II., in his despair, is ready to welcome death, but cannot find it as long as hope remains, I will despair, and be at enmity With cozening hope : he is -a. flatterer^ A parasite, a keeper back of death, Who gently would dissolve the bands of life, Which /rt/st' liopc lingers in extremity. (Richard 77. II. ii. 68). So also when Lord Rivers brings to Elizabeth, Queen of Edward IV., "News full of grief," he suggests the con- jectural hope that, Warwick may lose, that now hath won the day. a solace which the Queen accepts, because she desires to live that Edward's unborn son may also live. Till then/cj/r liope must liinder life's decay. (3 Henry VI. IV. iv. 13). Claudio accepts the same prescription, The miserable have no other medicine But only hope. (Meas.forMcas.lll.i.2). The flattery of hope has been referred to in some of the passages already quoted, as well as the food it supplies to maintain health and prolong life. ' ' Doth any man doubt," says Bacon, in the first of his Essays, — of "Truth," " That if there were taken out of men's minds vain opimons, flatter- ing hopes, false valuations, imaginations as one would, and the like, but it would leave the minds of a number of men poor, shrunken things, full of melancholy and indisposition, and unpleasing to themselves." This kind of artificial feeding on hope is much to the taste of such dreaming speculators as the Alchemists. " For the Alchemist nurses eternal hope, . . . and when among the chances of experi- ment he lights upon some conclusions either in aspect new, I06 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. or for utility not contemptible, he takes these for earnest of what is to come, and feeds his mind upon them, and magnifies them to the most, and supplies the rest in hope." {Novum Organum, I. 85). This sort of diet, Bacon notes, is useful for exiles, Spes alit exsules. (Promus 561), and Gaunt prescribes it, with much detail of the dishes that furnish this diet, for his banished son, Bolingbroke. Quite a group of "flattering hopes, false valuations and imagination of things as one would" is collected in this homily for an exile. The passage is too long for quotation. {Rich. II. I. iii. 258—303). When Valentine is banished, the same nourishment is offered to him by the treacherous Proteus : — Hope is a lover's staff ; walk hence with that, And manage it against despairing thoughts. {Two Gent. Ver. III. i. 246.) Bacon in one of his apophthegms tells a story, the moral of which is, " Hope is a good breakfast, but a bad supper." The visionary, imaginative quality of Hope brings it into relation with opiates, sleep and dreams. In the preface to the unwritten discourse on the Sympathy and Antipathy of things the following curious passage is found : — "This part of Philosophy is very corrupt ; and (as is al- most always the case), there being but little diligence there has been too much hope. The effect of hope on the mind of man is very like the working of some soporific drugs, which not only induce sleep, but fill it with joyous and pleasing dreams. For first it throws the human mind into a sleep, . . . and then it insinuates and infuses into it innumerable fancies like so many dreams." (Works, V. 203). The hopes which centre about princes, heirs apparent, expectants of sovereignty, illustrate this. Bacon takes up this parable in one of his discourses : he unfolds the hidden wisdom of Solomon's saying, "/ considered all the living which walk under the sun, with the second child who shall arise in his stead. This proverb remarks upon the WAKING DREAMS. I07 vanity of men, who are wont to crowd about the appointed heirs of princes. The root hereof is in that madness, deeply implanted by nature in human minds, of being too fond of their own hopes. For there is scarcely anyone but takes more delight in what he hopes for than in what he has. Novelty also is very pleasing to man, and is eagerly sought for. Now in a prince's heir hope and novelty are com- bined. And this proverb implies the same as that which was said of old, first by Pompey to Sylla, and afterwards by Tiberius respecting Macro : ' That there be more who worship the rising than the setting sun.' And yet princes are not much disturbed at this, nor do they care much for it, as neither Sylla nor Tiberius did ; but they rather scorn the fickleness of mankind, and do not care to strive with dreams : and hope, as was said, is but the dream of a waking man." [De Augmentis VIII. ii. ; Works, V. 48). Curiously enough the same sentiment, illustrated by the same allusion is uttered by the cynical misanthrope in Timon, Apemantus, who gives voice to sentiments such as must have haunted Bacon's mind after his fall : — We spend our flatteries to drink those men, Upon whose age we void it up again. . . . I should fear those that dance before me now Would one day stamp upon me : 't has been done : Men sliut their doors against a setting sun. (Timon I., ii. 142.) The same tendency to listen to flatteries of hope is characteristic of love — is one of its many follies. It is equally irrational whether it believes and hopes too much or too little : — • O hard-believing love, how strange it seems Not to believe, and yet too credulous ! Thy weal and woe are both of them extremes, Despair and hope makes thee ridiculous : The one doth flatter thee in thoughts unlikely ; In likelv thoughts the other kills thee quickh'. (V. A. 985.) I08 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Alonso, thinking his son has been drowned, abandons the hopes which have deceived him : — Even here I will put off my hope, and keep it No longer for my flatterer. {Temp, III., iii. 7.) Bacon, however, not only admits, but sedulously cultivates that kind of reasonable hope that is not con- jectural or imaginative, but rests on well ascertained facts. In the Novum Organum I. 92 — ii|, he dilates largely on the "grounds of hope " for the progress of science. He is, however, careful to put aside the "lighter breezes of hope," and "bring men to particulars." And these are discussed in the twenty-three Axioms referred to. The "lighter breezes of hope" (92) are evidently the same as "the tender leaves of hope," whose blighting by " a frost," a "killing frost" is so pathetically described in Henry VIII. III. ii. 353. Such failure of hope is described also in AWs Well, the King having tried all known remedies for his apparently incurable disease. " He hath abandoned his physicians, under whose practices he hath persecuted time with hope, and finds no other advantage in the process, but only the losing of hope by time." {All's Well, I. i. 15). It must be admitted that the echoes of Bacon's most singular and original sentiments, which I have pointed out in Shakespeare, are most remarkable. Vernon Lee's " Baconian thoughts in Baconian language " are not to be mistaken, and the significance of this exact and curious correspondence cannot fail to impress all fair minded and careful students. This philosophy of " Hope," which is equally character- istic of Bacon and Shakespeare, is not a set of common- place notions, floating in the air, any man's property who chooses to pick them up. They are so strange and individual, so peculiar and startling, that even Spedding was half scandalized by them. Bacon's mind, and surely also Bacon's hand is equally to be recognized in both the prose and poetry. log CHAPTER VIII. BACON'S SARTOR RESARTUS. One of Bacon's most characteristic maxims is that, behaviour is rather external to the mind than a part of its essence. It may be assumed {i.e. taken up), imitated, worn as a garment, put on or put off, altered, or varied according as mood or circumstances, or convenience, or policy, or fashion may suggest. It is dress, not flesh ; a garment, not a cuticle. The earliest expression of this idea is to be found in a long and thoughtful letter written to the Earl of Rutland in 1595-6. The Earl was about to travel, and Bacon wrote three letters of advice to help him to make the best use of his foreign experiences. It is worth noting, as bearing on Bacon's very usual habit of writing under other names than his own, that these letters were written over the name of the Earl of Essex, and sent to Rutland by the Earl as his own composition. They are published in Devereux's Memoirs of the Earls of Essex (1852). I have already (see p. 37) referred to the fact that Spedding was the first to assign these very remarkable letters to Bacon as their true author. He proves his case, partly by the incommunicable evidence of flavour, — tasting the style, — partly by com- paring both the ideas and the terms in which they are expressed, with analogous sentiments and identical phrases- in Bacon's acknowledged writings. In the first of these letters we find the following : — "Behaviour is but a garment, and it is easy to make a comely garment for a body that is itself well-pro- portioned. Whereas a deformed body can. never be so. no SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. helped by tailor's art, but the counterfeit will appear. And in the form of our mind it is a true rule, that a man may mend his faults with as little labour as cover them." ("Life," II., 8). The idea is more elaborated in the "Advancement ■' (II. xxiii. 3); and in the Dc Augmentis (VIII. i.). "Behaviour is as the garment of the mind, and ought to have the conditions of a garment. For first, it ought to be made in fashion ; secondly, it •ought not to be too curious or costly ; thirdly, it ought to be so framed as to best set forth any virtue of the mind, and supply and hide any deformity ; lastly, and above all, it ought not to be too strait, so as to confine the mind and interfere with its freedom in business and action." The last sentence of the Essay of "Ceremonies and Respects," introduces another allusion to dress or costume : — " Men's behaviour should be like their apparel, not too strait or point device, but free for exercise or motion." Bacon has a Promus note (1439) which seems to refer to this idea, but it is cryptically expressed, and probably meant for no other eye than his own. It runs, " The ayre ■of his behavior: fashions." Mrs. Pott probably puts a right construction on this entry by comparing it with the following passages in Shakespeare : — " I am a courtier. Seest thou not the air of the Court in these enfoldings ? Hath not my gait in it the measure of the Court ? " ■{Winter s Tale IV. iv. 755). " Promising is the very air of the time." {Tiiiion V. i. 24). These passages refer to both behaviour and fashion as part of any one's costume, or outward enfoldings, or investment. The general principle, that behaviour is a garment, so •compactly expressed in Bacon's prose, is a seed that blossoms and bears abundant fruit in Shakespeare's poetry. It is emphatically the aphorism of dramatic art, the very key-note of histrionic performance, whether on the stage or elsewhere, and the allusions to it are very numerous in .Shakespeare. BEHAVIOUR A PART OF DRESS. Ill First of all, it is to be noted, that the language of the wardrobe is applied to behaviour or deportment in pre- cisely the same way. The quality indicated by point device is referred to by Rosalind in such a way as to apply equally to dress and to conduct : she comments on the absence in Orlando of any of the indications of "careless desolation " which a lover ought to show — indications belonging both to behaviour, and appearance, and cos- tume ; and she sums up with: — "You are rather point device in your accoutrements, as loving yourself than seeming the lover of any other," (See As You Like It III. ii. 387-403). This expression, point device, is to be found in Love's Labour Lost V. i. 21, applied to conduct, not to dress. It evidently means spruce, dandified, exquisite, and though referring to dress, includes behaviour. Bacon's idea is, however, expressed in the most direct and unmistakable way by Portia, who makes a sort of inventory of the garments of one of her suitors, and one article of his attire is "behaviour": — "How oddly he's suited" {i.e. clothed). " I think he bought his doublet in Italy, his round hose in France, his bonnet in Germany, and his behaviour everyvuhere." {Merchant of Venice I. ii. 79). The general idea connecting behaviour as such with dress is implied in the following passage, where Bacon's suggestion that fashion may be concerned in the selection of these garments is also implied : — Let not the world see fear and sad distrust Govern the motion of a kingly eye : Be stirring as the time ; be lire with fire ; Threaten the threatener, and outface the brow Of bragging horror ; so shall inferior eyes, That hoi row their behaviours fiom the great, Grow great by your example, and //// on The dauntless spirit of resolution. {King -John V. i. 46). 112 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Queen Katherine, speaking to the two Cardinals, has the same philosophy in her mind : — If you have any justice, any pity, If ye be anything but Cliiircliiiicn's habits, — {Hen. VIII. 111. I ii6). Malvolio is encouraged to present himself before Olivia, his lady, with " A sad {i.e. grave) face, a reverent carriage, a slow tongue, in the habit of some Sir of note." {Twelfth- Night III. iv. 80). These are garments which he is to put on, and thus cast away an inferior garment, viz. — "his humble slough." The twin brother and sister, in the same play, have "one face, one voice, one habit, and two persons." (76. V. i. 223). Here the ambiguous word habit may refer either to dress or behaviour, and is doubt- less intended to include both. Without special comment, the following specimens may be added : — Opinion's but a fool, that makes us scan TIic out-ward habit by the inward man. {Per id. II. ii. 56). This man, so complete, . . . Hath into monstrous habits put the graces, That once were his, and is become as black As if besmear'd in hell. {Hen. VIII. I. ii. 122). O place, O form. How often dost thou witli thy case, thy habit, Wrench awe from fools, and tie the wiser souls To thy false seeming. {Meas for Meas. II. iv. 12). And every lovely. organ of her life Shall come apparetl'd in more precious habit. More moving-delicate, and full of life, Into the eye and prospect of his soul. Than when she lived indeed. {M. Ado IV. i. 226). Looking a little more carefully we may find several GARMENT OF MADNESS : OF STATE. II3 varieties of this costume, which may be put off and on at the pleasure of the wearer. 1. Madness or Folly : — Hamlet tells his friends that he may find it necessary to counterfeit madness, and warns them not to betray him, — How strange or odd soe'er I bear myself As I perchance hereafter shall think meet To put an antic disposition on. (Ham. I. V. 170J. The dress of assumed madness was also worn by Brutus, the friend of Lucretius. He with the Romans was esteemed so As silly, jeering idiots are witli kings, For sportive words and uttering foolish things. But now he throws that sJiallow habit by Wherein deep policy did Iiiin disguise. (Lucrece, 18 11). Touchstone wears a somewhat similar garment ; the banished Duke says of him, "He uses his folly like a stalking horse and under the presentation of that he shoots his wit." {As You Like It, V. iv. iii). The stalking horse was of course a mask or disguise, a garment worn by the fowler, under cover of which he could approach his game and shoot at an advantage ; and Jacques is willing to wear a suit of motley in order that he may comment with unrestrained freedom on the follies and foibles of society. (See^s Yoii Like It, II. vi. 41-61). 2. State and Pride is the garment which Brutus, throwing aside the shallow habit of folly, wears as a substitute : — Brutus, who pluck'd the knife from Lucrece side, Seeing such emulation in their woe. Began to ctotlic liis wit in state and pride, Burying in Lucrece' wound his folly's show. {Lucrece, 1807). The garment of state and pride was one of many costumes that Henry IV. wore. His presence was 114 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Like a robe pontifical. (i Hen. IV. III. ii. 56). Pride is also worn and the wearer takes delight in the reflected contemplation of it, Pride haih no otiier glass To show itself but pride. {Trail. Cress. III. iii. 47). The wardrobe conceit is rarely, or perhaps never, lost sight of either in Bacon's philosophy of behaviour, or in Shake- speare's pictures thereof. 3. Sobriety or sadness, i.e., gravity, is the garment which Gratiano promises to wear when he visits Portia, If I do not //// on a sober habit, . . . Like one, well studied, in a sad ostent, To please his grandam, never trust me more. (Mer. Ven. II. ii. 199). Sad ostent is a curiously ambiguous phrase, the double entendre includes a great variety of outward forms of sober expression, both in dress, and in conduct. Gravity in the form of apathetic or phlegmatic indiffer- ence is represented as put on : Brutus and Cassius are talking about Casca, Brutns. — What a blunt fellow is this grown to be ! He was quick mettle when he went to school. Cassius. — So is he now, in execution Of any bold or noble enterprise, However he puts on this tardy form. {Jul. Ca's. I. ii. 299.) Orlando "put on the countenance of stern commandment.'' {As You Like It U. vii. 108.) 4. Mirth is the garment which Bassiano wishes Gratiano to wear, instead of gloom ; it is thus he is " suited " : — No, that were pity ; I would entreat you rather to put on Your boldest suit of mirth. {Mer. Ven. II. ii. 209.) GARMENT OF PIUMILITY : OF VIRTUE. II5 5. Humility is a garment which Coriolanus tried to put on, but could not make it fit, and he very soon cast it aside. Brutus, one of the tribunes, thus describes the attempt : — I heard him swear, Were he to stand for consul, never would he Appear i' the market-place, nor on him put Tlic napless vesture of liuniility. {Cor. II. i. 247.) But he makes the attempt, and With a proud heart lie wore Jiis Innnble zveeds. {lb. II. i. 161.) The visible garment of humility was simply put on ; his proper costume was arrogance and pride, Henry IV. was more politic :^ I stole all courtesy from heaven, And dtess'd myself in such humility, That I did pluck allegiance from men's hearts. (i Hen. /F. III. ii. 50.) He selected the garment of humility as one best adapted for him to wear, as a king of doubtful title, for whom it was necessary that he should " pluck allegiance from men's hearts." The special garment which represents humility is named by the clown in AlVs Well. " Though honesty be no Puritan yet it will do no hurt ; it will wear the surplice of humility over the black gown of a big heart." {All's Well, I. iii. 97). 6. Virttie may be worn as a garment and is often put on as a mask for villany, or as a hypocritical semblance of what does not exist. The counsel, which Luciana gives to Antipholus of Syracuse, thinking she is addressing Anti- pholus of Ephesu?, is full of imagery derived from the ■clothes philosophy : — Alutfie your false love with some show of blindness . . . Il6 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Look sweet ; speak fair ; become dislo3'alt)' ; Apparel vice, like virtue's harbinger ; Bear a fair presence, though your heart be tainted ; Teach sin tlic carriage of a holy saint, . . . Though others have the arm, s/zac ns the sleeve. (Sec Com. Er. III. ii. i— 28.) Hamlet preaches the same philosophy to his mother : — Assume a virtue, if you have it not. That monster, custom, who all sense doth eat. Of habits devil, is angel yet in this, That to tlie use of actions fair and good He likewise gives afrocJi or livery, That aptly is put on . . . For use almost can change the stamp of nature. {Ham. III. iv. 160.) So Imogen, smarting under her husband's false accusa- tion, thinks that all virtue is but an appearance, and that suspicion may taint the holiest : — All good seeming, By thy revolt, O husband, shall be thought Put on for villany, not born iclicrcl gjvws, But icorn, a bait for ladies. {Cymb. III. iv. 56.) Abhorson's mystery expresses itself in the Delphic utterance : — " Every true man's apparel fits your thief : if it be too little for your thief, your true man thinks it big enough ; if it be too big for vour thief, your thief thinks it little enough ; so every true man's apparel fits 3'our thief." {Meas. for Meas. IV. ii. 46.) " Which thing is an allegory," and its solution can be found only in Bacon's philosophy of behaviour. 7. Content can also be worn as a garment by the dis- contented. Cassio, if he knows that he cannot regain Othello's favour, — But to know so must be my benefit. So shall I ilotlic me in a forced content. {0th. III. iv. 119.) sanctity: love: strangeness. 117 8. Sanctity is a robe which the vilest may put on : Oh, 'tis the cunning livery of hell, The damned'st body to invest and covet In prenzie guards. {Meas.for Meas. III. i- 95.) Strike me the counterfeit matron. It is her liabii only tliat is honest, Herself 's a bawd. {Tiinon IV. iii. 112.) g. Love has a large wardrobe of different garments : •It is Full of strange shapes, of habits, and of forms Varying in subjects as the eye doth roll To every varied object in his glance : Which parti-coated presence of loose love. Put on by us, if in your heavenly eyes. Have misbecom'd our oaths and gravities, etc. {Love's Labour's Lost V. ii. 773.) 10. Strangeness, or behaving like a stranger instead of a friend, is the garment which Achilles wore, and of which i\gamemnon makes bitter complaint. Worthier than himself Here tend the savage strangeness he puts on. {Tro. Cr. II. iii. 134., When anyone modestly keeps his own gifts in the back- ground he puts on strangeness : — It is the witness still of excellency To put a strange face on his own perfection. (il/. Ado II. iii. 48.) Many of these passages illustrate a sort of offshoot of this philosophy of behaviour, which is certainly a reflec- tion of Platonic Philosophy. As a garment may be imitated, so it may be reflected in a glass or mirror, and so the wearer may see the garment which he wears. The glass which the Platonic poet generally refers to is the same garment worn by others ; and anyone who wears a Il8 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. fantastic garment may be taught how fantastic it is by seeing it, as in a glass, worn by another. The philo- sophical axiom, Pride hath no other glass To shew itseU", but pride. {Tro. Cr. III. iii. 47.) has been already quoted. Here it illustrates a collateral branch of the Baconian philosophy. The strangeness which Achilles wore is similarly re- flected in the glass of imitation. By this artifice his own pride is shewn to him. (See Tro. Cres., Ill, iii, 38 — 53.) The figure of a glass and that of a garment are thus closely connected. Conduct, our philosophic poet says, is regulated by imitation. We unconsciously imitate those with whom we associate. Those, who are inferior, dress in behaviour as well as in costume, like their betters. They Borrow their beliaviours from the great. (Jo//// V. i. 51.) And those who set the fashion are described as the glass before which others dress. Thus, Hamlet is spoken of by Ophelia as — The glass of fashion, and the mould of form, The observed of all observers. {Ham. III. i. 161). Leonatus is — A sample to the 3'oungest, to the more mature A glass ilvciif cated them. {Cymb. I. i. 48). Feaied being equivalent to "formed, fashioned, moulded" (Dyce). Lady Percy speaks in the same way of her deceased lord, the brave Hotspur, and she also, like Portia, gives a sort of inventory of the garments which he wore in his behaviour, and which others put on by imita- tion, dressing themselves at his glass. THE GLASS OF BEHAVIOUR. II9 He was indeed the glass Wliereiii the noble youth did dress themselves; He had no legs that practised not his gait; And speaking thick, which nature made his blemish, Became the accents of the valiant, .... So that in speech, in gait, In diet, in affections of delight, In military rules, humours of blood. He was the mark and glass, copy and book. That fashioned others. (2 Hen. IV. II. iii. 21). The philosophic principle, on which all this poetry is con- sciously founded, is given in dry, scientific statement, without dramatic illustration, in Bacon's prose. Com- menting on Proverbs xxvii. ig, " As the face is reflected in the water, so is the heart of man manifest to the wise," he writes : — " Here is distinguished between the mind of a wise man and that of others ; the former being compared to water, or a glass, which represents the forms and images of things ; the other to the earth, or an unpolished stone, which give no reflection. And this comparison of the mind of a wise man to a glass is the more proper, because in a glass he can see his own image, together with the images of others, which the eye itself without a glass cannot do. But if the mind of a wise man is sufficiently large to observe and distinguish an infinite variety of dis- positions and characters, it only remains to take care that the application be as various as the representation. ' A wise man will know how to adapt himself to all sorts of characters.'" {De Aug. VIII. ii. Prov. xxxiv.) "It is best wisdom in any man in his own matters to rest in the wisdom of a friend ; for who can, by often looking in the glass, discern and judge so well of his own favor, as another with whom he converseth." Letter to Essex (" Life " I. 235). " The second way (to attain experience of forms or behaviour) is by imitation. And to that end good choice is to be made of those with whom you converse ; there- 120 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. fore 3'our Lordship should affect their company whom you find to be the worthiest, and not partially* think them most w^orthy whom you affect When you see infinite variety of behaviour and manners of men, you may choose and imitate the best. (Letter to Rutland. "Life" II. 8-10). The striking resemblance between these sentiments and those expressed many times in Shakespeare must be obvious to any careful student. Since j'ou cannot see yourself So well as by reflection, I, your glass, Will modestly discover to yourself That of yourself whicli you yet know not of. {'Jul. Civs. II. i. 67). The beauty that is borne here in the face The bearer knows not, but commends itself To others' eyes ; nor doth the eye itself. That most pure spirit of sense, behold itself, Not going from itself ; but eye to eye opposed Salutes each other with each other's form : For speculation turns not to itself, Till it hath travelled, and is mirror 'd there. Where it may see itself. {Tro. Cr. III. iii. 103 j. Well, Brutus, tliou art noble : yet I see Thy honourable mettle may be wrought From that it is disposed. Therefore 'tis meet That noble minds keep ever with their likes ; For wlio so wise that cannot be seduced ? {'Jul. Cns. I. ii. 312). And Bacon himself might have put the following into his "Essays" — as, indeed, he has done in other words. Falstaff in delivering a genuine Baconian Essay, says, It is certain that either wise bearing or ignorant carriage is caught, ■*Men's faults do seldom to themselves appear ; Their own transgressions partially they smother. {Ijtcrcce 633). THE PRINCE IN MASQUERADE. 121 as men take diseases, one of another. Therefore, let men take heed of their company. — 2 Hen. IV. V. (last long speech}. Bacon's conception of behaviour as a garment, a loose- fitting, changeable vestment, must be kept in mind if we would understand Shakespeare's picture of Prince Hal, the young prince, who is outwardly wild, but really serious, ready as soon as the time comes to wear the royal robes, as Henry V., with wisdom and majesty. The psychological enigma involved in this sudden change has been a stumbling-block to many readers, and to most critics. The solution is evidentl}' to be found in Bacon's clothes philosophy, which the prince uses in the account he gives of himself: — Herein will I imitate the sun, Who doth permit the base contagious clouds To smother up his beauty from the world ; . . . But when this loose behaviour I throw of, . . . By liow much better than my word I am, By so much shall I falsify men's hopes. (i Hen. IV. I. ii. 221). Note here, the ambiguous, or rather double meanmg of the word loose — one meaning from the clothes philosophy, the other from ethics — changeable or disorderly. The same ambiguity is found in the use of the same word in a passage already quoted from Love's Labour's Lost V. ii. 776. Which parti-coated presence of loose love. This Apologia of the Prince shews that in his wild days he was wearing a disguise, — a strange dress, which he could put off as soon as it had served (or " suited ") his purpose. Even the "base contagious clouds " carry out the same idea — they are worn by the sun for a time like a mask, as long as he wishes to hide himself. There is another very curious extension of this clothes philosophy. If behaviour is a garment, it may be, — and probably is, — not constructed by the wearer, but by some one 122 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. who represents his tailor, And there are many passages in which a man is represented as made by his tailor. This is anticipated, as an undeveloped fancy, in the letter to Rutland, already quoted : "A deformed body can never be so helped by tailor's art but the counterfeit will appear." In Shakespeare this reference to the tailor's art as fashion- ing the man himself is always employed with some degree of contempt : the scorn for "counterfeit" is apparent. This idea is more or less clearly reflected in the following passages : — " Now, the melancholy God protect thee ; and the tailor make thy doublet ot changeable taffeta ; for thy mind is a very opal " (Tivclfili yighf II. iv. 77). Taffeta is a kind of shot silk, changeable in its colour ; and opal is "a gem which varies in appearance as it is viewed in different lights." (Dyce, quoting Steevens). Cloten, the vulgar ruffian prince, claims the homage due to rank as indicated by his clothes ; and the true prince in rustic garb, Guiderius, detects the counterfeit, and sees only a tailor-made prince : — Cloicii. — Thou villain base, Know'st me not b}' my clothes ? Gitid. — No, nor thy tailor, rascal, Who is thy grandfather ; he made those clothes, Which, as it seems, make thee. {Cymb. IV. ii. 80). So in Lear, Kent, in his scorn for Goneril's steward, Oswald, says. You cowardly rascal, nature disclaims in thee : a tailor made thee. Cornwall. — Thou art a strange fellow : a tailor make a man ? {Lear II. ii. 59). As behaviour is a changeable fashion, so facial expres- sion, as Bacon teaches us, being the most significant element in behaviour, can be changed at pleasure. It can be put on or put off like a garment. Bacon discourses on the THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FACE. I23 " government of the face and countenance" as a branch of that part of civil knowledge, in which conversation is con- cerned. "For, look what an effect is produced by the countenance and the carriage of it. Well says the poet, ' Nee vultu destrue verba tua. ' (Do not falsify your words by your looks). For a man may destroy and betray the force of his words by his countenance. ... So we see Atticus, before the first interview between Caesar and Cicero, the war still depending, carefully and serious!}' advised Cicero touching the composing and ordering of his countenance and gesture." And the philosophy of behaviour as the garment of the mind follows almost im- mediately. See " De Augmentis " VIII. i. The Latin motto here quoted is twice entered in the " Promus " (985 and 1026). And a similar proverb is also noted, *' Vultu Iceditur saepe pietas." (51). (A man's piety is often damaged by the expression of his features): — shewing how strong a hold this sentiment had on Bacon's m.ind. All this is clearly reflected in Shakespeare. Brutus wishes his fellow conspirators to employ this stratagem of the actor's art : — Good gentlemen, look fresh and merrily ! Let not our looks piii on our purposes But bear it as our Roman actors do, With untired spirits and formal constancy. {Julius Ccesar II. i. 224). Lady Macbeth gives the same counsel to her husband ; every line is redolent of the clothes philosophy : — Gentle my lord, sleek o'er your rugged looks ; Be bright and jovial among your guests to-night. Macb. — So shall I, love : and so, I pray, be you : Let your remembrance apply to Banquo ; Present him eminence, both with eye and tongue ; Unsafe the while, that we Must lave our honours in these flattering streams, And make our faces vizards to our hearts, Disguising what they are. {Macb. III. ii. 2^). 124 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Away, and mock the lime with fairest show : False face must liide what the false heart doth know. {lb. I. vii. 8i). The Clarendon Editor very aptly illustrates the above use of the word apply by the following quotation from Bacon's Essay of "Ceremonies," where the sentiment ex- pressed in the text is most exactly presented : — "To apply one's self to others is good, so it be done with demonstration that a man doeth it with regard, and not upon facility," which is the same as "Present him emi- nence both with eye and tongue." Very much the same counsel is given by the King to Laertes when the two are plotting together for Hamlet's assassination : — Weigh what convenience both of time and means May fit us to our shape : if this should fail, And that our drift look through our bad performance, 'Twere better not assay'd : therefore this project Should have a back or second, that might hold If this should blast in proof. {Ham. IV. vii. 150). This is strangely Baconian, as Colonel Moore has pointed out (see " Bacon Journal " I. 192). The same astute calcula- tion is thus described by Bacon : — " For in every particular action a man ought so to direct and prepare his mind, and should have one intention so underlying and subordinate to another, that if he cannot obtain his wishes in the best degree, he may yet be satisfied if he succeeds in a second or even a third." {De Augmentis VIII. ii.). In all these cases, and in countless others we find a philosophic, scientific, prosaic statement of the principles, which live and act in the Shakespearian drama. Com- paring Shakespeare's art with Bacon's philosophy, we find that The art and practic part of life Must be tlie mistress to this theoric. {Hen. V. I. \. si) SCIENCE BODIED IN POETRY. I25 In the language of mystic philosophy Shakespeare's art is the continent and ultimate of Bacon's philosophy : there is a perfect correspondence and continuity between them. As the natural world is created by influx from the spiritual world, and is its counterpart and representative, so is the poetry of Shakespeare poured forth as influx from the creative thought of Bacon's science, giving to it a concrete: presentation, a living, organised counterpart. 126 CHAPTER IX. LOVE AND BUSINESS. Bacon's Essay of " Love " compared with the Treatment of Love in Shakespeare. In Tennyson's " Life " (II. 424) the following occurs in a letter to a friend : — "I have just had a letter from a man who wants my opinion as to whether Shakespeare's Plays were written by Bacon. I feel inclined to write back, ' Don't be a fool, sir! ' The way in which Bacon speaks of love would be enough to prove that he was not Shake- speare. ' I know not how, but martial men are given to love. I think it is but as they are given to wine, for perils commonly asked to be paid in pleasures.' How could a man with such an idea of love write Romeo and Juliet ? " And 3^et even Tennyson might have paused before shutting off the claims for Bacon with such resolute in- credulity, not to say unexpressed incivility. For he himself had found in Bacon qualities which are at first sight quite as incompatible with an unromantic view of love, as he supposed Shakespeare to be. Tennyson had been on one occasion speaking of Lord Bacon, and said, " That certain passages of his writings, their frequent eloquence and vivid completeness lifted him more than those of almost any other writer." And of the Essays he said, "There is more wisdom compressed into that small volume than in any other book of the same size that I know." ("Life" II. 76, 415). Clearly, then, any unfavour- able impression derived from one or two passages in a 5mall Essay may be corrected and perhaps even vindicated THE STUMBLING-BLOCK. 127 when a larger view is taken. What more could he say of Shakespeare's wisdom than this ? The objection which Tennyson expressed so energeti- cally is one that is often raised when the Baconian theory is under discussion. The Problem. 1. It has often been objected to the Baconian theory, that the author of the Essay of " Love"' and of " Marriage and Single Life " could not also have written the exquisite love scenes of the Shakespeare plays. Bacon's view of love, it is said, is so cold, so passionless, so unromantic, that he was evidently incapable of understanding or sympathising with the sweeter aspects of the tender passion. This objection is presented in a ver\' triumphant way, as at once settling the whole question, and indeed many Baconians at first find it staggering and embarrass- ing in the highest degree, — an argument which it is extremel}' difficult to meet. It is worth while then to examine it somewhat carefully ; and in doing so the polemics of the case need not blind us to the exceedingly interesting and suggestive comparisons, which it necessi- tates between the poet and the essayist. Those who urge this objection, do so, it seems to me, in a very loose way, not attempting to estimate the real purpose or import of the Essays : not taking any very comprehensive view of the attitude of the Shakepearean poet to the sentiment of love. If the two are to be com- pared, it is only fair to make a quantitative and qualitative analysis of both. Mistaken View of the Essay. 2. Bacon speaks in his Preface of a double purpose in his Essays: "They come home to men's business and bosoms." One might suppose that if he wrote on love and marriage, the "bosom" side of his readers would be 128 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. especiall)' addressed. But it is not so : the bosoiu side is neglected — the topic of the Essay is the business side of this question. The Essays are very brief, very aphoristic, very concentrated, never discursive or rhetorical, but severely reflective and practical. It is true that poetic touches of the most exquisite character constantly present themselves. The Essay of " Adversity," for instance, is a most perfect poem. But on the whole, in the Essays emotion is sup- pressed, business is supreme. Anyone who goes to the Essay of " Love " for a complete account of Love in all its points of contact with life and experience, is on a wrong quest. Love from the Statesman's and Philosopher's point of view, — love as related to what we might now call politics or economics, — love in its bearing on public life and " business," is the real topic and no other. The mere title "Of Love,"— ''Of Marriage and Single Life,"— does not justify anyone in assuming that the text shall contain exactly what he expects — exactly what he would have written on these topics. These Essays are not accommo- dated to the preconceptions of a Ninteenth Century reader, whose mind is saturated with the fiction, romance or poetry of its literature. And Bacon does not trouble him- self to define his limits ; any capable reader, who is entitled to criticise, can do that for himself. Such a reader will not be slow to perceive that here is nothing like a rhapsody, — not even an exhaustive psychologic or physiologic account of the passion or sentiment of love, but something entirely different. Many critics, strange to say, have started with the most unreasonable claim that Bacon's discourse on love shall contain not only what they think he ought to say, but all that he himself had to say — the whole continent of his thoughts and feelings about love. And if he does not satisfy these most unreasonable preconceptions, they, measuring the great man by their own small foot-rule, think themselves justified in writing about him in this style: — "Bacon knows nothing of the valuable influence of unselfish and holv love for a fair SELF-SATISFIED CRITICS. I29 mind in a fair body. His prudential treatment of the whole subject is scarcely better than the sneers of La Rochefoucauld." "His cold philosophic nature was in- capable of feeling or even imagining the loves of a Cornelia and Paulus, a Posthumus and Imogen." (Storr and Gibson's Edition of Essays.) Anything more narrow and impertinent than this it is difficult to conceive. These pedagogic censors of a great man make Bacon a sort of universal provider, and think themselves at liberty to enter his study (or shop) and order three courses and a dessert according to their own fancy ; and to whip and scold him, and sprinkle their bad marks over his exercises, whenever their order is not duly executed. Of such irreverent and self-sufficient critics Coleridge was thinking when he describes a self-confident critic who "puts on the seven league boots of self-opinion, and strides at once from an illustrator into a supreme judge ; and, blind and deaf, fills his three ounce vial at the Waters of Niagara, and deter- mines at once the greatness of the Cataract to be neither more nor less than his three ounce vial has been able to receive." The Essay of Love — Its Real Import. 3. Bacon does not entirely ignore the romantic side of love, but he refers it to different treatment. " The stage," he says, "* is more beholding to love than the life of man." In his Essay he is speaking of a somewhat neglected view of love. If it is predominant it is a "weak passion;" it may not govern all the actions of life. Walter Savage Landor expresses much the same idea: "Love is a secondary passion in those who love most ; a primary in those who love least." {Imag. Conv. Ascham and Lady Jane Grey.) Love, in Bacon's view, is for the privacy of home ; if it follows its votary into the street it becomes an enfeebling influence : "it checks with business; it troubleth men's fortunes, and maketh men that they can no ways be true to their own ends."' " Great spirits and great business K 130 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN HACOMAN LIGHT. do keep out this weak passion." " It is a strange thing to note the excess of this passion, and how it braves the nature and value of things by this, that the speaking in a perpetual hyperbole is comely in nothing but love." "He that preferred Helena, quitted the gifts of Juno and Pallas; for whosoever esteemeth too much of amorous affection quitteth both riches and wisdom." " Amare et sapere vix Deo conceditur." " Love is the child of folly. They do best who, if they cannot but admit love, yet make it keep quarter, and sever it wholly from their serious aifairs and actions of life." This is not a popular view of love, but it may be true nevertheless, and it may be held by one who is no cynic, not a cold-blooded, self-centred, worldly- minded egotist, but a keen observer, who will not suffer his view of the realities of life to be distorted by romance. It is a permissible theory that love is for private, household use ; that, like religion, it must enter into its closet and shut the door ; that If it intrudes into the market place it is both weak and ridiculous, and hinders the lawful business of the place. This is Bacon's position, stated with his usual epigrammatic terseness, not fenced by such explana- tions as purblind readers need in order to keep them from stumbling. And this neglected view is exactly what might be expected from a writer who has no relish for conven- tional platitudes, no room for common-places, and who knows quite well that fair and competent critics will judge him, not from one utterance, but from an impartial and com- prehensive study of his whole life, and of all his writings. Bacon's Praise of the Worthiest Affection. 4. Bacon points to the Drama as the most suitable stage for the portraiture of love ; and his scanty reference to it in his prose writings is naturally explained by those who know how magnificently he poured out all the treasures of his heart, his fanc}', and his intellect in his dramatic poetry. There is, however, one prose composition, which, occurring in a masque, belongs properly to dramatic BACON S EULOGY OF LOVE. 13I literature, in which love is the theme of most eloquent and poetic eulogy. This is to be found, in a mutilated form, in the "Conference of Pleasure." which contains a discourse "in praise of the worthiest affection." The speech is too long for quotation, but as this delightful piece is not easily obtainable, I give a sample : "As for other affections they be but sufferings of nature ; they seek ransoms and rescues from that which is evil, not enjoying a union with that which is good. They seek to expel that which is contrary, not to attract that which is agreeable. Fear and grief, — the traitors of nature. Bashfulness, — a thraldom to every man's concept and countenance. Pity, — a con- federacy with the miserable. Desire of revenge, — the supplying of a wound. All these endeavour to keep the main stock of nature, to preserve her from loss and dimi- nution. But love is a pure gain and advancement in nature ; it is not a good by comparison, but a true good ; it is not an ease of pain, but a true purchase of pleasures ; and therefore, when our minds are soundest, when they are not, as it were, in sickness and therefore out of taste, but when we be in prosperity, when we want nothing, then is the season, and the opportunity, and the spring of love. And as it springeth not out of ill, so it is not inter- mixed with ill : it is not like the virtues, which by a steep and ragged way conduct us to a plain, and are hard task- masters at first, and after give an honourable hire ; but the first aspect of love, and all that followeth, is gracious and pleasant." Let us now see if the Shakesperean treatment of love differs in any essential respect from Bacon's. My conten- tion is, that they are curiously identical, — so much so as to supply, on a very extended scale, one of those striking correspondences between the two groups of writings, which in their accumulation point irresistibly to identity of authorship. Restricted Use of Love in Shakespeare. 5. One of the most striking features of the Shakesperean 132 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. drama is the extremely restricted use it makes of love, which is supposed to be the foundation and pivot of dramatic art. The exceeding beauty and attractiveness of the love pictures actually given, blinds us to their rarity : they attract so much interest as almost to absorb the con- sideration of the reader or spectator, and put other scenes into the shade. Also the charm of these love pictures is so great that we are apt to forget that they are often set in a framework of weakness, confusion, or disorder, — that there is a canker of decay in even the loveliest of these flowers. Apart from this it is to be remarked that in a large propor- tion of the plays love is either entirely absent or completely subordinate, — not the main centre of interest or action. And again, even where some slight love element is intro- duced, it may be not only very unimportant, but entirely destitute of romance or fascination. Mr. T. W. White, among other critics, notes this fact as very remarkable. He says, "Shakespeare is almost alone among his contem- poraries and successors in frequently rejecting love as the motive of his drama ; " and the conclusion at which Mr. White arrives is, that the poet had a weak animal develop- ment ! "Shakespeare, in the selected passages (from Hamlet) to which we have referred, manifests a total insensibility to the gross passion of love. In descriptions of Platonic affection and conventional gallantry he is un- surpassed ; but when he essays to be personally tender, his muse becomes tediously perfunctory, as we see in Hamlet." ("Our English Homer," pp. 31, 122). I quote these passages, not as agreeing with them entirely. Mr. White is often inaccurate, still more fre- quently eccentric and paradoxical, and sometimes, as it seems to me, strangely purblind. But his judgment may be taken as a tolerably accurate representation of the conclusion likely to be formed by any one who fairly fronts the question, and is not misled by early and crude impressions. If, however, we may briefly run through the plays,. THE HISTORICAL PLAYS. 133 taking a swift glance at each, the resemblance between the Shakesperean and the Baconian view of love will become distinct and even startling. Love in the Historical Plays. 6. First of all, let us look at the Historical Plays. In these love is throughout subordinate, and in some it is entirely absent. It is absent from John, and Richard II. In I Henry IV. it is incidentally introduced in the persons of Hotspur and Lady Percy, and it shows Hotspur so intent on business as almost to neglect his wife, and provoke her reproaches. O, my good lord, why are you thus alone ? For what offence have I this fortnight been A banished woman from my Harry's bed ? And then she tells him how she has watched him, awake and asleep, and finds that his mind is occupied with concerns in which she is not permitted to share : — Some heavy business hath my lord in hand, And I must know it, else he loves me not . . . In faith, I'll break thy little finger, Harry, And if thou wilt not tell me all things true. But the "mad-headed ape," the "weasel toss'd with such a deal of spleen," "the paraquito," as she with playful irritation calls him, brusquely puts her off with, — Awa}', 3^ou Trifler ! Love ! I love thee not, I care not for thee, Kate. And then, in reply to her pained remonstrance, he replies : Come, wilt thou see me ride ? And when I am o' horseback, I will swear I love thee infinitely. But hark you, Kate, I must not have you hencefortli question me Whither I go, nor reason whereabout : 134 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Whither I must, I must. (Sec I Hill. /['. II. iii. 40 — 120). It is a charming picture of true love on both sides ; but the husband has his love in check, and when the wife tries to spy into his business, he gaily thwarts her, being evidently resolved to keep his active life as a warrior and politician entirely unembarrassed by domestic ties. If any one looks for love; scenes in 2 Hen. IV., he must find them in company with Doll Tear-sheet, or be content to miss them altogether. In Henry V. there is a pretty wooing scene between the King and the French Princess. In this wooing, however, there is more policy than passion. The whole transaction turns on considerations of State advantage and Royal con- venience. Here is a specimen ; it is all in prose : — Before God, Kate, I cannot look greenly nor gasp out mv eloquence, nor have I no cunning in protestation ; only downright oaths, which I never use till urged, nor never break for urging. . . . I speak to thee plain soldier : if thou canst love me for this, take me ; if not, to say to thee I shall die, is true ; but for thy love, by the Lord, No ! 3'et I love thee too. — (See the whole scene in Hcii. F. V. ii.) There is a good deal of this kind of self-possessed, — one may even say, self-centred love-making. It is the ideal portrait of a man who "if he cannot but admit love, yet makes it keep quarter." It shews in what way and how far "martial men are given to love. I think it is but as they are given to wine, for perils commonly ask to be paid in pleasures : " a compensation to be duly paid when the business is transacted. The play of i Henry VI. contains one wooing incident, but no love. The wooing is by proxy, and the alliance is entirely dictated by State policy. See Act V. sc. v. There is nothing of the kind in 2 or 3 Henry VI. In Richard III. love is very sparingly introduced, almost ignored, and wdien introduced, most curiously blended with LOVE RULES NOT : BUT IS RULED, I35 hatred and repugnance. At the beginning of the play we come upon a fantastic mockery of courtship. The cynical wooer, for reasons connected solely with self-advancement, manages to change the lady's curses into caresses, and then jestingly exclaims, — Was ever woman in this humour woo'd ? Was ever woman in this humour won ? [Rich. III. I.ii. 228). The drama of Henry VIII. shews a royal lover, whose many courtships and espousals, so far from interfering with business, are entirel}' subservient to State considera- tions. The love of Queen Katherine is found to be in- consistent with the interests of royalty. The Queen, however, refuses to submit her married rights to such control, and urges them upon a spouse, who is determined that they shall not "check with his business," or " trouble his fortunes." Her claims are gently, but effectually put aside. We see then, that throughout the Historical plays love is managed, it never swaj's. It may be said that the Histories, from the very nature of the case, must show the public side of life, that their one aim is to present past events in a vivid, pictorial way. Consequently, love could not be introduced where the incidents did not supply it. This is only partially true. At any rate it is highly significant that the Shakespearean poet should, to so large an extent, make selection of subjects which accept this limitation. And it is also to be noted, that every con- structor of an historical romance feels himself at liberty to embellish and enhance the attraction of historic truth by additional touches derived from his own fancy, and as a rule these invented embellishments consist of love scenes. It is, then, not a little remarkable that Shake- speare takes no pains so to select or record his historic facts, that they may bear the freightage of love episodes, created by himself: he does not find it necessary to 136 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. shape the structure of his dramas, as he assuredly might, so as to heighten their interest by the glow and radiance of passion. In most other hands doubtless love passages would have been added, even if the history had to be strained in order to find place for them. We find, then, that every one of the love incidents in the historic plays might be taken as cases in point, ex- pressly intended to illustrate the philosophy of love, marriage, and business, as expounded in the Baconian '•Essays:" a conclusion, I imagine, which few readers would anticipate. Love in the Tragedies. 7. The Tragedies, as might be expected, give us some excellent pictures of the Romantic side of love. Here, then, we shall perhaps, find the want of harmony between the "Essays" and the "Plays," on which the critics so vauntingly descant. Let us see if this is really the case. Troilus and Cressida is certainly not a love Tp\a.y. The puzzle of it, — if it was written by a theatrical manager for business purposes, — is how such a profound study of moral, social, and political philosophy could have ever been put upon the boards. A love scene is, indeed, the central incident of the plot ; but there is a wanton element in it. There is a startling contrast between the exquisite beauty and rapture of the vows, which the lovers utter when they are wooing, and the subsequent infidelity of the lady, who had protested so ardently her eternal constancy. It is an episode in the great drama, and one of weakness and shame. None of the noblest persons in the play have any share in this part of it, nor any love passages of their own. In reading it we are reminded of Bacon's remark, "You may observe that amongst all the great and worthy persons, whereof the memory remaineth, either ancient or modern, there is not one that hath been transported to the mad degree of love : which shews that great spirits and great business do keep out this weak passion." This maxim LOVE IN THE TRAGEDIES. 137 certainly applies to this play and to all the Shakespearean drama. Another of the maxims which has been alread}' quoted, as to love braving the nature of things by its per- petual hyperbole, is exactly reproduced with added cynicism in the following : — Tro. — O, let my lady apprehend no fear, in all Cupid's pageant there is presented no monster. Cres. — Nor nothing monstrous either ? Tro. — Nothing, but our undertakings : when we vow to weep seas, live in fire, eat rocks, tame tigers : thinking it harder for our mistress to devise imposition enough, than for us to undergo any difficulty imposed. This is the monstrosity in love, lady, that the will is infinite and the execution confined, that the desire is bound- less and the act a slave to limit. Cres. — They say, all lovers swear more performance than they are able, and yet reserve an ability that they never perform; vowing more than the perfection of ten, and discharging less than the tenth part of one. They that have the voice of hons, and the act of hares, are they not monsters ? {Tro. Cres. III. ii. 71). In Coriolanus the love element is absent. It is how- ever worthy of remark, that the personal appeal of the women and children of Rome, by which the vengeance of the hero is averted, is spoken by the mother, who has out- lived the romance of her young days, not by the wife. Doubtless history required this ; but it did not dictate such a striking contrast as that we find between the strength of the widowed mother, and the feebleness, tame- ness, almost insipidity of the wedded wife. The widow is self-reliant and masterful ; the tender, plastic period of her life has passed ; while the wife is timid, shrinking, help- less, incapable of action or of cheerfulness without the stimulus of her husband's presence. During his absence she can only sit at home, musing and mooning, and pining and watching for his return. Titus Andronicus is a play of the dramatic's earlier time, written in what Count Vitzthum calls the "Marlowe period " of Bacon's life. And in a play of this period, if 138 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. anywhere, one might expect to see love pictured in its romance and fascination. But it is entirely absent. Or, if present at all, its demonic aspect alone is presented : it is associated with those revolting scenes of blood, and horror, and cruelty, and outrage, which make this play as much a puzzle as Bacon himself, or the Baconian theory. The critics would gladly hand it over to Marlowe, and many of them do s^. But in Romeo and Juliet : surely romantic and passion- ate love is here ! Yes, truly it is ; but it is a consuming passion which blasts and ruins its victims, and spoils them for the practical "business" of life. The perfect and matchless beauty of the picture may well make us oblivious of the latent moral — " This passion hath his floods in the very time of weakness." The play is a commentary on Bacon's aphorism — "In life it doth much mischief, some- times like a siren, sometimes like a Fury : " both the siren and the Fury appear in the play. The moral is, the fatal consequence of being "transported to the mad degree of love." Friar Lawrence draws the moral : — These violent delights have violent ends, And in their triumpli die ; lilce fire and powder, Which as they kiss consume : the sweetest hone}^ Is loathsome in liis own deliciousness, And in the taste confounds the appetite. Therefore love moderately ; long love doth so ; Too swift arrives as tardy as too slow. {Rom. Jul. II. vi. 9). Love is shewn as " one of those bodies which they call imperfectc niista, which last not, but are speedily dissolved." (" Life," III. 94). It is full of paradox :— O lieavy lightness ! serious vanity ! Misshapen chaos of well-seeming forms ! Feather of lead ! bright smoke ! cold fire ! sick health ! Still-waking sleep, that is not what it is ! [lb. I. i. 184.) When Romeo's wooing is interrupted by his banishment, he is ready to destroy himself, and well does he deserve FRIAR LAWRENCE S INVECTIVE. I39 the long lecture on fortitude which Friar Lawrence ad- dresses to him, shewing that the passion which possesses him is essentiall}^ a "weak passion." These are the scathing terms, which the judicious priest considers appropriate : — Art thou a man r thy form cries that thou art : Thy tears are womanish ; thy wild acts denote The unreasonable fury of a beast : Unseemly woman in a seeming man ! Or ill beseeming beast in seeming both ! Thou hast amazed me : bv m}^ holy order I thought thy disposition better temper'd. [RoiJ!. 'Jill. III. iii. 109). Fie ! Fie ! thou sham'st thy shape, thy love, th}' wit . . . Th)^ noble shape is but a form of wax, Digressing from the valour of a man. Thy dear love sworn, but hollow perjur}-, Killing that love which thou hast vow'd to cherish. Thy wit, that ornament to shape and love, Misshapen in tlie conduct of them both, Like powder in a skilless soldier's flask. Is set afire by thine own ignorance, And thou dismember'd with thine own defence. (//). III. iii. 122.) Bacon's indictment against love is accurately repro- duced, much augmented and intensified. In Timon of Athens, the only two female characters introduced are the two mistresses of Alcibiades. In the whole play love is absolutely ignored. In Julius CcBsar Portia is an ideal portrait of a "noble wife," a sweet and stately Roman matron, full of devotion to her lord. But Portia complains, in much the same terms as Hotspur's wife, that Brutus carefully shuts her out from all share in his public life. She is kept severely for home use, and may not follow her lord into the halls and marts of civic business. She too tells her husband how she had observed signs of distraction in him : — And when I asked vou what the matter was. 140 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. You stared upon me witli ungentle looks. (fill. C^l!S. II. i. 241). The strife between love and business could not be better pictured than in this striking scene between Brutus and Portia. Brutus is deeply touched by Portia's death, but he hides his emotion, and will not permit even this to weaken him in his public duties. Julius Caesar is half persuaded by Calpurnia to absent himself from the Senate House, but the sarcasms of Decius Brutus have more power over him than the terrors and entreaties of his wife. Portia and Calpurnia are the only two female characters in this noble drama, and their power and place exactly correspond with the limitations which Bacon defines as the proper enclosure for love. Antony and Cleopatra presents us with Bacon's own chosen exception to the rule that — "Great spirits and great business do keep out this weak passion. You must except nevertheless Marcus Antonius, the half-partner of the Empire of Rome." The Essay of " Love" is the key which unlocks the meaning of the play. The opening lines bring before us a great spirit mastered and ruined by passion :^ Nay ! but this dotage of our General's O'erflows the measure : those his goodly e3'es That o'er the hies and musters of the war Have glowed like plated Mars, now bend, now turn, The office and devotion of their view Upon a tawny front. (Aiif. CIco. I. i. i). We might quote half the play to illustrate the senti- ments and cautions of the Essay. In the whole play Bacon's philosophy is speaking articulately, in concrete stage effects. Bacon writes, "They do best who, if they cannot but admit love, yet make it keep quarter and sever it wholly from their serious affairs and actions of life." LOVE UNDER CONTROL. I4I This Antony failed to do, and this accounts for the disaster and ruin, which overtakes the lovers and all who are swayed by them. This is the whole motive and idea of the play. The Essay and the play fit one another as text and pictorial illustrations. Macbeth and Lear may be passed over without any other comment than that love is entirely absent : no love instance can be extracted from them. In Lear there is some lawless love, no true love. In Hamlet love plays a very subordinate but a ve~ry significant part. Hamlet and Ophelia are in love with one another ; she deeply, he sincerely but moderately. He is a "great spirit," and consequently the mad degree of love does not reach him : he can master his passion and make it "keep quarter." The great business to which he has devoted himself is checked by many influences, — by " bestial oblivion, or some craven scruple of thinking too precisely on the event," by his habit of deliberation and procrastination ; but love interposes no obstacle. The very opposite is the case with Ophelia ; love, and its issue in disappointment, overpowers her reason and her will, and leads to the self-slaughter, to which Hamlet also was tempted, but was strong enough to resist. Ophelia's ruin is the result of this "weak passion." The Queen is the text for many of Hamlet's reproaches of womankind : "Frailty, thy name is woman;" "Brief as woman's tears." And Hamlet's opinions about love are the same as Bacon's, but expressed with even greater frankness and cynicism: "If thou wilt needs marry, marry a fool ; for wise men know well enough what monsters you make of them ; " and we know from the discourse in Troilus and Cressida what the poet was thinking of when he spoke of monsters, and how exactly this is reflected in Bacon's Essay. In Othello Bacon's text is almost quoted, and is very vividly illustrated. Both the Siren and the Fury appear, and with the Fury its consequent mischief. Othello's love 142 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. is moderate and self-poised : there is no madness in it ; but it is the basis of the jealousy and rage excited by the wily suggestions of lago. Here is the one " weak" point in his nature, through which he becomes plastic to the "tempering" of his Ancient. In everything else he is unassailable : as a lover he is feeble and flexible, and this it is which brings ruin and death, first to Desdemona, and then to himself. Here again Bacon's philosophy is most accurately reflected. Othello is appointed to high military command just at the time of his marriage, and he will not for a moment permit his duty to the State to be interrupted or damaged by the newly- contracted ties. His resolve is almost textually a reproduction of Bacon's Essay :— And heaven defend your good souls, that you think I will your serious and great business scant For she is with me ; no, when light-winged toys Of feather'd Cupid seel with wanton dulness My speculative and officed instruments, That my disports corrupt and taint my business, Let house-wives make a skillet of my helm, And all indign and base adversities, Make head against mv estimation ! {pih. I. iii. 266). And to Desdemona he says : — ■ Come, Desdemona, I have but an hour Of love, of worldly affairs and direction. To spend with thee : we must obey the time. {lb. 299), In Cymbeline love is not ignored, and it is the only one • of the tragedies, in which the sentiments of the Essay of " Love " are not expressly reflected. But even here there is nothing inconsistent with the Essay. The love of Imogen is a perfect picture of womanly affection and con- stancy : the woman's side is excellently given. But the husband's side is lightly and imperfectly sketched. His heroism, his fortitude, his intellectual power and culture, his trust in his wife's goodness, his agony on finding as he supposes that she is unfaithful, all these are evident : he LOVE IN THE COMEDIES, I43 appears rarely and fitfully on the scene, and has no very important relation to the action of the drama. The love element in the play is quite subordinate ; the real dramatic business is independent of it. In Pericles love is associated either with romantic adventure or hideous pollution. There is nothing attractive or sacred in it ; it is rather a disturbing than an essential element. It is not omitted, but one could almost wish that it had been. So far, then, in the ten histories and twelve tragedies. Bacon's view of love is not only never contradicted, but it is uniformly {Cymheline excepted) reflected, and that with singular, and sometimes almost textual accuracy. Perhaps the comedies will supply us with the contrast, which we are so confidently assured exists, between Bacon's conception of love and Shakespeare's pictures of it. Let us open them and see. Love in the Comedies. 8. The Tempest gives us an enchanting picture of the love between Ferdinand and Miranda, and on this incident much of the action of the drama turns. But here love and the work of life are absolutely detached ; and what may be the poet's idea of the relation between them cannot pos- sibly be surmised from the pure fantasy of this exquisite vision. The Two Gentlemen of Verona supplies us with a most genuinely Baconian view of love ; it is represented as a source of weakness and folly, and spoils the votary for the true pursuits of life. To be in love, where scorn is bought with groans ; Coy looks with heart-sore sighs ; one fading moment's mirth With twenty watchful, weary, tedious niglits ; If haply won, perhaps a hapless gain ; If lost, why then a grievous labour won ; However but a follv bought with wit, Or else a wit by folh' vanquished. . . . . As the most forward bud 144 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT, Is eaten by the canker ere it blow, Even so by love the young and tender wit Is turned to folly. And Proteus, as he takes farewell of Valentine, who goes, To see tlie wonders of the world abroad, while he remains "living dully sluggardized at home," thus moralizes, — He after honour hunts, I after love ; He leaves his friends to dignify them more ; I leave myself, my friends, and all, for love. Thou, Julia, thou hast metamorphosed me. Made me neglect my studies, lose my time. War with good counsel, set the world at nought. Made wit with musing weak, heart sick with thought.* {Two Gent. I. sc. i. I. i — 69). Julia's own impressions are not very different : Fie, fie, how wayward is this foolish love, That like a testy babe, will scratch the nurse, Then presentlv, all humbled, kiss the rod. {lb. I. ii. 57^. The special marks of a lover, enumerated by Speed, are every one of them tokens of weakness, or of unnatural transformation. "You have learned, like Sir Proteus, to wreathe your arms, like a malcontent ; to relish a love-song, like a robin-red-breast ; to walk alone, like one that had the pestilence; to sigh, like a schoolboy that hath lost his A. B.C. ; to weep, like a young wench that hath buried her grandam; to fast, like one that takes diet; to watch, like one that fears robbing ; to speak puling, like a beggar at Hallowmas. You were wont, when you laughed, to crow like acock; when you walked, to walk like one of the lions ; wlien you fasted, it was presently after •■■ En passant, observe the interesting anticipation of the leading motif of Hamlet in the last two lines. The same infirmities, as inci- dent to studious pursuits, are alluded to in Bacon's "Advancement of Learning," I. ii. i and 4. LOVE IN THE COMEDIES. I45 dinner ; when you looked sadly it was for want of money ; and now you are metamorphosed with a mistress, that, when I look on 3'ou I can hardly think you my master." (lb. II. i. i8j. The metamorphosis, thus referred to, is the same con- dition that Bacon describes as "transported to the mad degree of love." The play does not omit to speak of the "blmdness," and "folly" of love. And the "perpetual hyperbole " of the lover provokes the exclamation, Why, Valentine, what braggardism is this ? {lb. II. iv. 164). Nothing could possibly match the Essay better than the poetry of this play. There is little genuine love in the Merry Wives. The love-making of Falstaff, although exquisitely comic, is worthy of the verdict he himself pronounces upon it, — "I do begin to perceive that I am made an ass." The one genuine love scene is between two of the weakest and most shadowy personages in the drama — Fenton and Ann Page ; and this is evidently intended as a foil to the principal action of the play, in which love is simply a matter of mockery and intrigue. In this play love is a jest, — it is knavery caught in its own snare. Under its influence, Shakespeare's wittiest character becomes contemptible, and "the argument of his own scorn." Measure for Measure has no love scene, properly so-called. The love element is essentially present, but it is also entirely subordinate. For, mark its function, — to create the situations out of which trouble, danger, cowardice, humiliation or disgrace arise to its principal subjects, and dishonour, crime and misgovernment to the ruler, Angelo. Love is throughout a disturbing and enfeebling influence, and the chief business of the play is to extricate its best characters from the embarrassments into which love has plunged them, Here, however, we find, very distinctly expressed, the fact that " great spirits and great business do keep out this weak passion." For the Duke is the most L 146 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. strong in judgment and sound in heart of any of the characters ; he it is who may be taken as the earthly Providence of the piece ; he, if anyone, is the mouth-piece of the poet himself. The Duke retires from public life, and in his seclusion Friar Thomas suspects that some love sentiment may be the motive for his withdrawal, and for the disguise which he assumes. This idea is very promptly, and even peremptorily, repudiated, and in truly Baconian terms : — No, holy father, throw awa}^ that thought ; Beheve not that the dribbling dart of love Can pierce a complete bosom. {Mens, for Meas. I. iii. i.) The Duke is glancing at the law so clearly expounded by Bacon: — ''It seems, though rarely, that love can find entrance, not only in an open heart, but in a heart well fortified, if watch be not well kept." The Comedy of Errors is one of the plays from which love is almost entirely excluded. There is a wooing scene, but it is one of the " errors " of the comedy, and the issue of it is wisely expressed by the rejected suitor. The attractions of a fair face may make its victim untrue to his own ends. The fair lady Hath almost made me traitor to myself : But, lest myself be guilty to self-wrong, I'll stop mine ears against the mermaid's song. (Com. of Err. III. ii. 167). In Much Ado love is present, supplying matter for tragedy in Hero's case, and for comedy in Beatrice's. Claudio's is a sentiment, which lightly comes and lightly goes ; he only admits it when, on his return from military service, "war thoughts have left their places vacant;" and then he allows his wooing to be done by proxy. The lovers, in all cases, are either the victims or the sport of illusion. The love of Benedict and Beatrice is the out- come of a practical joke, and the success is matter for LOVE IN THE COMEDIES. _ I47 mirth. With Hero and Claudio, their love is for a time blasted by a trick, and their resulting misfortune gives occasion for sympathy with that ; but their love is kept in the background ; there are no love passages to show its quality. Benedict expresses the Baconian view of love with amusing frankness : — I do much wonder that one man, seeing how much another man is a fool when he dedicates his behaviour to love, will, after that he hath laughed at such shallow follies in others, become the argument of his own scorn, by falling in love : and such a man is Claudio. . . . and then he describes the alteration which he sees in Claudio in consequence. May I be so converted, and see with these eyes ? I cannot tell : I think not. I will not be sworn that love may transform me to an oyster : but I'll take my oath on it, till he have made an oyster of me, he shall never make me such a fool. (7^). II. iii. 7)- Love's Labour Lost gives a truly Baconian view of love, as the disturbing element in public life, the foe at once to study and to business. The King and his lords wish to make their Court a little Academe, and devote themselves to study ; they resolve to exclude from their Court all women, so as to run no risk of being ensnared by passion and sentiment. But in spite of their precautions, love finds an entrance, and then of necessity folly comes ; they all try to conceal their passion, and are much abashed when discovered. One after another they are betrayed, and then Biron, the most Baconian of all the speakers, thus comments on the situation : — O what a scene of foolery have I seen. Of sighs, of groans, of sorrow and of teen ! O me, with what strict patience have I sat, To see a king transformed into a gnat ! To see great Hercules whipping a gig, And profound Solomon to tune a jig ; And Nestor play at push-pin with the boys, And critic Timon laugh at idle to_vs. (7^. IV. iii. 163). I4S SHAKESPEARE STUDIF.S IN BACONIAN LIGHT. There is plenty more of this kind of pleasantry, and the same note of folly and confusion is still found, even when the news of the death of the King of France banishes all idle mirth. Still Biron moralises in truly Baconian language :— For your fair sakes have we neglected lime, Play'd foul play with our oaths. Your beauty, ladies. Hath much deformed us ; fashioning our humours Even to the opposed ends of our intents. {lb. V. ii. 765.) Of course, the poet who writes thus might have written — " Love, if it check with business, troubleth men's fortunes, and maketh men that they can no ways be true to their own ends." Therefore, ladies, Our love being yours, the error that love makes Is likewise yours ; we to ourselves prove false, B}^ being once false, for ever to be true To those that make us both, — fair ladies, you. {lb. V. ii. 780.) Here then is Bacon's most distressing presentation of love, reproduced with cynical frankness in Shakespeare. In Midsummer Nighfs Dream, again, love is a toy — the sport of imps, summoned or dismissed by charms and magic arts. All the lovers are more or less bewitched — the stateliest of them bestows her blandishments on the head of an ass, — they all surrender their individuality and become puppets, whose strings are pulled by fairies. Here also we see love and madness coupled together, because the subjects of both have "seething brains," and "shaping fantasies," that apprehend More than cool reason ever comprehends. The madman "sees more devils than vast hell can hold," while the lovers' delusions, though less infernal are "all as frantic," for he "sees Helen's beauty in a brow of Egypt." The passion of Titania for the clown Bottom is. LOVE IN THE COMEDIES. 149 a parable, and carries its moral. Those who censure Bacon should have something to say about the cynicism of the poet who allows Titania to give her heart to Bottom. The Midsummer Nighfs Dream is full of Baconian senti- ments about love. Can anything be more typical than the following. Bottom speaks to Titania : — Reason and love keep little company now-a-days : the more the pity that some honest neighbours will not make them friends. (M. N. D. III. i. 146.) On this play Professor Brandes makes the following significant comment — "It is a lightly flowing, sportive, lyrical fantasy, dealing with love as a dream, a fever, an allusion, an infatuation, and making merry especially with the irrational nature of the instinct. . . . Shakespeare is far from regarding love as an expression of human reason. Throughout his works, indeed, it is only by way of exception that he makes reason the determining factor in human conduct. The germs of a whole philosophy of life are latent in the wayward love scenes of a Midsummer Nighfs Dream." And it is not a little obvious to add that this philosophy of life is the philosophy of Bacon's Essay. The Merchant of Venice contains some of the most exquisite love scenes ever invented. But even here, love is not the main, nor the most attractive business of the play, and the entrance into love is either blind or wilful, and in all cases quite unheroic. Portia's choice in love is determined by lottery. Nerissa's is a shadow of Portia's ; Jessica's is a runaway match, in which there is a good deal of calculated self-seeking ; her love makes her a rebellious and undutiful child, an apostate to her faith, and a pilferer. Here also Love is blind, and lovers cannot see The pretty follies that themselves commit. {Mcr. of Veil. II. vi. 36.) And the lady, Portia, whose love is the most pure and 150 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. exalted, does not forget how nearly allied are love and weakness, especially if love is ardent, and does not "keep quarter : '" — love, be moderate, allay thy ecstasy, In measure rein th}- joy ; scant this excess ; 1 feel too much thy blessing ; make it less For fear I surfeit. {lb. III. ii. iii.j The love scenes in As You Like It are exquisite pictures of either rustic simplicity or Arcadian sport. The rustic lovers, "natives of the place," do not show love in any ennobling light. The maiden is cruel and scornful ; the swain is abject and pitiful, — but the love is on the abject and pitiful side. The courtly lovers, who woe in the forest, present love as a comedy ; the lady masquerading as a boy, and playing with the weakness of her lover, who was quite willing to be manipulated as a marionette, if he may thus indulge his fanc3\ Touchstone's love is abso- lutely unreal and fantastic. All the love incidents illustrate the sentiment which is the keynote of all this part of the drama. How many actions most ridiculous Hast thou been drawn to by thy fantasy : which Touchstone repeats in other phrasing : — We that are true lovers run into strange capers : but as all is mortal in nature, so is all nature in love mortal in foil}'. And Rosalind, hearing such a slander on her own condi- tion, is yet forced to admit that there is some truth in the impeachment, — Thou speakest wiser than thou art ware of. (See II. iv. 26 — 60.) This play is exceptionally affluent in descriptions of the manner, and behaviour, and appearance of lovers. The characteristic signs are thus described : — A lean check, a blue eye and sunken ; an unquestionable spirit LOVE IN THE COMEDIES. I5I [i.e., unsociable, not inclined to talk], a beard neglected ; ungartered hose ; the shoe untied ; and everything about you demonstrating a careless desolation. (As You Like It, III. ii. 392) "Love is merely a madness," and deserves its ordinary treatment, viz., a dark house and a whip. Rosahnd describes the sort of behaviour she put on when she was acting the part of a lover : — At which time would I, being a moonish youth, grieve, be effemi- nate, changeable, longing and liking, proud, fantastical, apish, shallow, inconstant, full of tears, full of smiles, for every passion something, and for no passion truly anything, . . . would now like him, now loathe him, then entertain him, then forswear him, now weep for liim, then spit at him, that I drave my suitor from his mad humour of love to a living humour of madness. (lb. III. ii. 420). Nothing can be more exquisitely pictured ; every scene is enchanting, but it is folly, weakness, self-immolation that is depicted in the love passages of this delicious frame- work of Arcadian romance and simplicity. As in the "Dream," the natural comment of the sportive outsider is, " Lord, what fools these mortals be." In the Taming of the Shrew there is no real love making. All the wooing is based on self-interest, none on genuine attraction. There is much wooing and some marrying, but no love. The only serious moral is that spoken by Katherine, after she is tamed : — Now I see our lances are but straws. Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare. (Tain, of Shreii: V. ii. 173). In AlVs Well, no male character submits to the assault of the tender passion, except in gross forms. Bertram resists its approach, and treats it with scorn. Helena's love is strong and faithful, but folly and weakness attend it. Her love is given to an inaccessible and unresponsive idol, I know I love in vain, strive against hope : Yet in this captious and intenible sieve 152 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. I still pour in the waters of my love. {All's Weill, iii. 207). She is content to bring her husband to her arms by a loathsome trick, pandering to his vices, and winning him in spite of liimself. The play is full of love ; but, with the doubtful exception of Helena, the ennobling, invigorating side of love is entirely absent. Twelfth Night shows us a royal suitor making futile love by proxy, and at last content to wed, not the lady of his choice, but the maiden who had fallen into presumably hopeless love with him, whom he had employed as a page, and known only in this disguise. A similar game of cross- purposes unites Olivia and Sebastian, neither of whom loved the other, but made their love contract under an illusion of mistaken identity. Love in Viola is most attractive, full of poetry and charm, and she is the only one whose passion is naturally requited. In all the other cases the love passages are fantastic and irrational, and are patched and mended by the evolution of fortunate blunders. Even here the Baconian estimate of love is not omitted. The Duke says to Viola, his supposed page-boy : — Come hither, boy : if ever thou shalt love, In the sweet pangs of it, remember me. For such as I am, all true lovers are, — Unstaid and skittish in all motions else, Save in the constant image of the creature That is belov'd. {Twelfih Night II. iv. 14). But of all the plays (except Othello and Antony and Cleopatra), it is in the Winter's Tale that we find Bacon's philosophy of love and business embodied in the most striking dramatic effects. Prince Florizel is a typical instance of the " mad degree of love": his passion "checks with business," and makes him " untrue to his own ends." That he may possess Perdita, whom he only knows as a low-born peasant girl, he is ready to give up his princely birthright, surrender his succession to the crown, brave LOVE IN THE COMEDIES. I53 the anger of his father, and bring danger not only on himself, but on the maiden of his choice and all her sup- posed relations. Nothing can be more reckless and irrational than his love vows :— Or I'll be thine, my fair, Or not my father's. For I cannot be Mine own, nor anything to any, if I be not thine. To this I am most constant, Though destiny say. No ! {lb. IV.iv. 42). In repl}^ to his father's threats he exclaims:^ From my succession wipe me, father, I Am heir to my affection. Camillo. — Be advised ! Flor. — I am, and by my fancy : if my reason Will thereto be obedient, I have reason ; If not, my senses, better pleased with madness, Do bid it welcome (76. 491). Here is clearly an example illustrating Bacon's keen remark : '' He that preferred Helena, quitted the gifts of Juno and Pallas : for whoever esteemeth too much of amorous affection, quitteth both riches and honour." The fantastic apology for the wooing of a peasant by a prince, presents us with a very Baconian picture of love and its precedents of folly :— Apprehend Nothing but jollity. The gods themselves. Humbling their deities to love, have taken The shapes of beasts upon them. Jupiter Became a bull, and bellow'd ; the green Neptune A ram, and bleated : and the fire-robed god, Golden Apollo, a poor humble swain, As I seem now. {Ih. IV. iv. 24). So then we find Shakespeare comparing his lovers to such curious cattle as divinities transformed to bellowing bulls, 154 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. or bleating rams, or humble swains. Bacon could not belittle them more effectually. Love Always Subordinate in Shakespeare. g. This hasty glance over the entire Shakespearean drama fully confirms the opinion of many critics, that in Shake- speare, more than in any other dramatist, love and passion are subordinate ; they are rarely, if ever, the leading motive of the play. And they bring before us the unexpected conclusion that what is condemned as cynical or hard in Bacon is reflected with singular exactness in nearly all the Shakespearean plays, — in many cases with almost verbal accuracy. Evidently the poet was not primarily occupied with rhapsodies of sentiment or passion : his chief aim is to embody in life-like forms the deepest results of his moral, social and political studies. In this respect the Poet and the Essayist are absolutely alike. Shakespeare, like Bacon, is an ethical teacher, a moralist, a philosopher, a statesman, devoted to the largest issues of public life, — full of world-embracing, statesmanlike wisdom, familiar with all sides of Court hfe and politics, — and to these aims all his music, his rhetoric, his fancy are subordinated. So much is this the case, that about half of his plays are never put on the boards, and probably were never intended for the theatre, being quite unsuitable for scenic effect. It is surely a most significant fact, that the greatest of all dramatists has written so large a proportion of plays which must be valued, not for their scenic merits, but for quite other reasons. Troilus mid Crcssida, and Timon, for instance, could not have been written by a stage manager, making copy for his boards, looking chiefly, or in any way, at the market value of his poetical inventions. Even Hamlet, attractive as it is, if it were produced without abridgment, would be intolerable. Shakespeare was evidently more a philosophical teacher than a caterer for popular amusement. If he had been, he would have used love and passion, with its romance, much more freely, and VARIOUS ATTRACTIONS IN SHAKESPEARE. 155 made them much more prominent. We should not find that in about thirteen of the thirty-seven plays love is almost or entirely absent, and that in all the rest Bacon's view of love is clearly reflected. If we run over the list, and pick out those plays which are more or less suitable for the stage, and are actually produced, we shall find that only about twenty out of the thirty-seven still hold the boards, and of these, seven or eight are rarely given, even by Shakespeare societies, which often select for representa- tion those plays which are never produced under pro- fessional auspices. The pla3^s which one has a chance of seeing on the boards are Henry IV. (rarely), Henry V., Richard HI., Henry VHI., Coriolanus, Julius Ccesar, Macbeth, Tempest, Hamlet, Lear, Othello. Merry Wives, Much Ado, Merchant of Venice, As You Like It, Midsummer Nighfs Dream, Twelfth Night, Winter's Tale, and Romeo and Juliet. Of these, only in the last five is love very prominent. In the rest we go to the theatre to laugh at or with Falstaff, to see Hotspur's high-bred impetuosity, the moral contrasts of Prince Hal, the audacity of Richard's villany, the sorrows and visions of Queen Catherine, the grandeur and abasement of Wolsey, the patrician pride and insolence of Coriolanus, the eloquence of Mark Antony, the headlong career of Macbeth, the enchantments of Prospero, the musings of Hamlet, the agony of Lear, the devilry of lago, the torture of Othello and Desdemona, the merry raillery of Benedict and Beatrice, the bucolic dignity of Dogberry, the ferocity of Shylock, the fascina- tion of Portia and her pretty impersonation of bad law and poetic justice, the cynical moralizing of Jacques, the jests of Touchstone, the wit and tenderness of Rosalind, and so forth. Almost invariably love keeps quarter, it retires into the background, and the main business of the play is independent of it. This is exactly what might be expected from the poet-philosopher, who declares that love limits the range of mortal vision, and is " a very narrow contem- plation " {Antitheta 36), and yet can, per contra, say 15b SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. also, "There is nothing that better regulates the mind than the authority of some powerful passion." Love in the Minor Poems. 10. The Minor Poems tell the same story. Lucrece is a commentary on Bacon's aphorism, "Martial men are given to love," taking its pleasures as payment for perils ; for Lucrece, in her eloquent pleadings with Tarquin, flings at him the reproach, — A martial man to be soft fancy's slave ! (Lucrece I. 200). and the whole poem, in its various phases and sections, illustrates Bacon's wise suminary of the whole of his essay : — " Nuptial love maketh mankind ; friendly love perfecteth it ; but wanton love corrupteth and embaseth it." Collatine, Brutus, and Tarquin represent these three types, and Lucrece herself touches all these aspects of love. Venus and Adonis is full of exquisite pictures of passion and love conflict ; but they are assuredly not charged with any lofty ideal or exalted morality, — the sentiment of love is presented romantically, but not with any high and ennobling features. The real moral of the poem is to be found in the closing stanzas, in which the Baconian view of love is again reproduced with almost audacious frank- ness. The goddess, in her grief at the death of Adonis, breaks out into melancholy moralizing and poetic prophecy : it is worth while quoting the lines as a speci- men of what Vernon Lee calls "Baconian thoughts in Baconian language : — Since thou art dead, lo ! here I proplies}' ; Sorrow on love hereafter sliall attend ; It shall be waited on with jealousy ; Find sweet beginning but unsavoury end ; Ne'er settled equally, but high or low, That all love's pleasure shall not match his woe. VENUS S INVECTIVE AGAINST LOVE. 157 It shall be fickle, false, and full of fraud ; Bud and be blasted in a breathing-while ; The bottom poison, and the top o'erstrawed With sweet, that shall the truest sight beguile. The strongest body shall it make most weak, Strike the wise dumb, and teach the fool to speak. It shall be sparing, — and too full of riot ; Teaching decrepit age to tread the measures ; The staring ruffian shall it keep in quiet, Pluck down the rich, enrich the poor with treasures. It shall be raging-mad, and silly-mild. Make the young old, the old become a child. It shall suspect, where is no cause of fear ; It shall not fear, where it should most mistrust ; It shall be merciful, and too severe. And most deceiving where it seems most just. Perverse it shall be where it shows most toward, Put fear to valour, courage to the coward. It shall be cause of war and dire events ; And set dissension 'twixt the son and sire ; Subject and servile to all discontents, As dry combustious matter is to fire ; Sith in his prime Death doth my love destroy, They that love best their loves shall not enjoy. Love Lyrics. If we turn to the remaining poems, we find the same pictures of love blended with folly or disaster. This is the theme of the Lover's Complaint and of the little poem, "Beauty is but a vain and doubtful good." But to find out all the lyrical utterances of the Shakespearean poet we must search the Elizabethan Song Books. There is a large collection of these in " England's Helicon," I have not the least doubt that this collection was made by Bacon ; his royal and antithetic style is unmistakable in the prose dedications and prefaces ; and his Shakespeare mantle is spread over quite a large number of the poems. All the twenty-five lyrics signed " Ignoto ; " the seven 158 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. signed "Shepherd Tony ; " probably those signed S.E.D., A.W., and H.S. are Shakespearean. It would be foreign to my present topic to pursue this subject further ; I ven- ture, however, to commend them to all who delight in the lyric music and matchless English of Shakespeare. The collection is indeed priceless. I will quote one to shew how Bacon's and Shakespeare's picture of love — its asso- ciation with folly and disaster — is reproduced in these poems. It is called An Invective against Love. The exquisitely articulated structure of the poem, the perpetual antithesis, the metaphors and sentiments most character- istic of Shakespeare, the rich and abundant thought, the crystaline clearness and felicity of every phrase, point unmistakably to the true author : as Mr. Gerald Massey found in another typical instance (See 2nd Edition of his book on the Sonnets, p. 459 ; but see fuller comments in the ist Edition, p. 465), The poem now to be quoted is attributed to " Ignoto " in the Prefatory Table: but in Davidson's " Rhapsody" it is attributed to A.W. (Bullen). Evidently the authorship is a very open question. The metre is the same as that of Venus and Adonis, and the versification resembles that poem in quite a remarkable way. All is not gold that sliineth bright in show ; Nor every flower so good as fair to sight : The deepest streams above do calmest flow, And strongest poisons oft the taste delight : The pleasant bait doth hide the harmful hook, And false deceit can lend a friendly look. Love is the gold whose outward hue doth pass, Whose first beginnings goodly promise make Of pleasures fair and fresh as summer grass, Which neither sun can parch nor wind can shake ; But when the mould should in the fire be tried, The gold is gone, the dross doth still abide. Beauty the flower so fresh, so fair, so gay. So sweet to smell, so soft to touch and taste, A POEM BY IGNOTO. 159 As seems it should endure, by right, for aye, And never be with any storm defaced : But when the baleful southern wind doth blow. Gone is the glory which it erst did show. Love is the stream whose waves so calmly flow, As might entice men's minds to wade therein ; Love is the poison mix'd with sugar so, As might by outward sweetness liking win ; But as the deep o'erflowing stops thy breath. So poison once received brings certain death. Love is the bait whose taste the fish deceives, And makes them swallow down the choking hook, Love is the face whose fairness judgment reaves. And makes thee trust a false and feigned look : But as the hook the foolish fish doth kill, So flattering looks the lover's life doth spill. Conclusions. 12. To sum up : after producing the evidence, I con- clude that the objection to the Baconian theory derived from Bacon's treatment of love, is not only not sustained by detailed examination, but the logical bearing of the comparison is exactly the reverse of that which is claimed for it. The Shakespearean view of love, so far from con- flicting with the Baconian, is curiously, and most significantly identical with it. So remarkably is this the case, that the parallel between them adds new force to our contention that Bacon was the real author of Shakespeare. It is admitted that Bacon's treatment of love is something startling and unexpected, something which, in some respects, even his admirers would wish a little softened or modified, or at least qualified by con- trasting lights or supplementary considerations. Perhaps no one can accept it without some distaste and resistance. Love is so enthroned in our hearts' belief — and is, in fact, so essentially Divine in its nature and origin — that we are unprepared for the relentless judgment which forbids its l6o SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. intrusion into public life, and requires of it to keep rigorous quarter in the seclusion of privacy. Yet this view is textually reproduced in Shakespeare. The poetry, v^hen it is translated into didactic forms, teaches precisely the same lessons as the prose. The ^thiope. 13. As an additional confirmation of the identity of the two we may point to a passage in the "New Atlantis," where the Spirit of Fornication "appeared as a little foul ugly i55^thiope." In no other sense is this word ever used in Shakespeare. Proteus, when he is tired of Julia, and has transferred his passion to Sylvia, says, And Sylvia, witness heaven that made her fair, Shows JuHa but a swarthy Etliiopc. (Tivo Gent. II. vi. 25.) Rosalind in her gay mockery of a rustic love letter speaks of — yEthiope words, blacker in their effect Than in their countenance. {As You Like II IV. iii. 35). In " Much Ado," Claudio expresses his willingness to marry Antonio's daughter, to replace Hero, supposed to be dead : and he thus expresses his resolve — I'll hold my mind were she an ^^thiope. {lb. V. iv. 38.) and Lysander spurns Hermia with the words, Away ! you JFAhio'pc. Midsiunmcr Night's Dream III. ii. 257. Scorn and disgust for some hated woman is the invariable application of this word in Shakespeare — as in the "New Atlantis." ASPECTS THAT PROCURE LOVE. l6l Love Engendered in the Eye. 14, It is not a little curious that Shakespeare very often speaks of fancy, or love, as " engendered in the eyes, with gazing fed." {Mer. Ven. III. ii. 67). This is not a mere poetic fancy, it is stated by Bacon as a scientific fact. " The affections no doubt do make the spirits more power- ful and active ; and especially those affections which draw the spirits into the eyes; which are two, love and envy, which is called oculus mains . , . and this is observed like- wise, that the aspects that procure love, are not gazings, but sudden glances and dartings of the eye." {Syl. Syl., 944). This shcf\vs us that the phrase quoted from the Merchant of Venice means that love is not only engendered by gazing, but fed by it after it has been engendered by a flash from the eye. This theory is expounded, with much amplification and abundant citation of classic authorities, in Burton's "Anatomy " (III. ii. 2, 2). The same psycho- logic theory is implied in Olivia's self-analysis of the sudden impulse by which her love to Viola has arisen :— Even so quickly may we catch the plague ! Methinks I feel this youth's perfections With an invisible and subtle stealth To creep in at mine eyes. (Twelfth Niglit I. v, 314.) So Cymbeline, conceiving a sudden attachment to the disguised Imogen, says, — Boy, Thou hast looked thyself into my grace, And art mine own. (Cymb. V. v. 93). The two notes of sudden creation, and the origin in the eye are to be observed in all these passages, as in the Syl. Syl. The same idea is implied when Antipholus of Syracuse, professing himself in love, " not made, but mated," is told by Luciana, :si l62 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN I.I(;HT. It is a fault that springcth from your eye. (Com. El. III. ii. 55). The ''affections which draw the spirits into the eyes " are described in detail, in Love's L. Lost II. i. 234 — 247 : — All his behaviours did make their retire To the court of his eye, peeping thorough desire : His heart, like an agate,with your print impress'd. Proud with his form, in his eye pride express'd ; His tongue, all impatient to speak, and not see, Did stumble with haste in his eyesight to be : All senses to that sense did make their repair To feel only looking on fairest of fair. Methinks all his senses were lock'd in his eye, As jewels in crystal, for some prince to buy. The same idea is expressed by JuHet : — I'll look to love, if looking liking move ; But no more deep will I endart mine eye Than your consent gives strength to make it fly. (Koiii. 'Jul. I. iii. 97). Mr. Neil's note on this passage is as follows : " In the Nichomachean Ethics, Book IX., chapter x,, Aristotle says that, 'Good will is conceived instantaneously,' that ' Good will is the prelude to friendship exactly as the pleasure of the eye is the prelude to love,' and Shakespeare has put this opinion into verse when he says of Fancy, as love. It is engendered in the e3^es, With gazing fed. {Mcr. Vcii.lU.u. 67). This agrees with Plato's suggestion in the Cratylus, that "epws love, is derived from da-pdi', streaming into, or influx." Here is another instance in which the poet, with his "small Latin and less Greek," shews intimate acquaintance with some of the most subtle and recondite teachings of Plato and Aristotle. All these passages, with many others, clearly echo Bacon's Promus Note (1137), equally applicable to poetry and philosophy. "The eye is the gate of the affection, LOVE AND REASON SEPARATE. 163 but the ear of the understanding," i.e., when any affection takes possession of the spirit, it enters into possession by the avenue of the eye. It is a very subtle notion. Both in the scientific statement and in the poetry love is said to spring from the eye, not merely of the object, but of the subject. Burton says that " Balthazar Castiho calls the eyes . . . the lamps of love," so that in the words of Troilus we may detect the Baconian theory of love, and put a more definite interpretation upon them : — To feed for aye her lamps and flames of love. {Tro. Crcs. III. ii. 167). These lamps and flames are the eyes, which are to be fed by gazing on the appropriate object. Marlowe's Hero and Leander gives expression to the same philosophy. Hero is at the altar of Venus : — There Hero, sacrificing turtles' blood, Vailed to the ground, veiling her eyelids close ; And modestly they opened as she rose : Thence flew love's arrow, with the golden head, And thus Leander was enamoured. {Hero and Leander I. 158). The eye thus both gives and receives the dart. Folly and Love Connected Generally. 15. As a corollary to this discussion of Bacon's Essay of ^' Love " it is important to observe that his view of love as e.ssentially blended with folly is but part of a larger philo- sophy, in which the same conjunction of folly with all strong emotion or enthusiasm is assumed as a metaphysical axiom, a law of psychology. That love in all its depart- ments is blind is a maxim constantly applied, both in the poetry and the prose. The detailed interpretation of the classical attributes of Cupid in the Midsummer Nighfs Dream, and elsewhere, might add another chapter to Bacon's "Wisdom of the Ancients." And it is evident. 164 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. that what is said of love, may be said of rapture generally. Helena speaks : — He will not know what all but he do know : And as he ens, doting on Hermia's eyes. So I, admiring of his qualities. Things base and vile, holding no quantity, Love can transpose to form and dignity. Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind, And therefore is wing'd Cupid painted blind. Nor hath Love's mind of au}^ judgment taste, Wings, and no eyes, figure unheedy haste. And therefore is Love said to be a child. Because in choice he is so oft beguiled. As waggish boys in game themselves forswear, So the boy love is perjured everywhere. {Midsii miner Night's Dream L i. 229). Now Bacon links love and folly in a very extensive way,, and very curiously. In the Proinus we find this singu- lar bit of antique French, " Un amoreux fait totijours. qiielqtie folagne" (1532) — meaning, I presume, one who is in love is always doing something ridiculous. And Bacon,, with his wonted habit of giving a large amplification and application to particulars, symbolic or didactic, applies this principle to the love which is expressed by any kind of enthusiasm. Thus he finds in this maxim a fantastic apology for his eagerness in giving advice when it was not asked: He sends his counsels and suggestions, he hopes^ "without committing any absurdity : " — " But if it seem any error for me thus to intromit myself, I pray your Lordship believe that I ever loved her Majesty and State,, and now love yourself: and there is never any vehement love without some absurdity ; as the Spaniard well saitlv Desnario con la calentura" ("Life," HI. 46). Later in life he makes the same apology to the Prince when he sent to him his "Considerations touching a War with Spain " : — " Hoping that at least you will discern the strength of my affection through the weakness of my abilities. For the Spaniard hath a good proverb, Desuaria SANCTITY : LOVE : STRANGENESS. 165 siempre con la calentura : there is no heat of affection but is joined with some idleness of brain " {lb. VII. 470). And in his discourse, addressed to the King, on planta- tion in Ireland (January ist, i6o8-g), he hopes that his Majesty " will through the weakness of my ability discern the strength of my affection " {lb. IV. 117). The same sentiment is connected with the proverb Amarc et sapere vix deo conccditur. Bacon in his prose nowhere quotes this proverb completely, only partially. But when it is translated into Shakespearean verse, it is given entire : — But 3-ou are wise ; Or else you love not ; for to be wise and love Exceeds man's might; that dwells with gods above. {Tro. Crcs. III. ii. 162). In the Essay of "Love," it is thus quoted: "And therefore it was well said that it is impossible to love and be loise.''' In "Burton's Anatomy" it is quoted in full, ^'Amare et sapere ipsi Jovi non concediticr, as Seneca holds " (Part III. ii. 3). In the last sentence of the Statesman's speech in Bacon's "Device" it is thus imperfectly pro- duced : — " So that I conclude I have traced him the way to that which hath been granted to some few, amare et sapere, to love and be wise" ("Life," I. 383). Thus not only love but all high emotion is more or less detached from wisdom. Rapture and reason belong to different types of nature and different departments of conduct or action. From all these passages we may infer that what, in Bacon's view, is foolish in some respects, may yet be very interesting, and associated even with wisdom in counsel and action; and that however much he may dwell upon the folly and unwisdom of lovers, he can at the same time admire the beauty, sincerity, depth, and fervour of the passion, and even find in the expression of it some- thing both "comely" and useful. It is true that the follv of lovers has been a shaft for the l66 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. wits of all ages ; but there is this difference between Bacon's wit and that which is current in the jests of other men. Other jesters note the folly, and only laugh at it, they do not reason upon it. With Bacon it is generalized, and finds its proper place in the philosophy of human nature : he takes its measure, and traces its ramifications in other departments of action, besides wooing. So also in Shakespeare, the folly of lovers is not merely an occasion for fun and quizzing; it is an ascer- tained settled fact, to be reckoned with in any large portraiture of human nature and its activities. Under all the toying and laughter, it is easy to see that the poet had a grounded and reasoned opinion that love is always associated with some sort of weakness and folly, and yet that with all this it is excellently fair and attrac- tive. Thus the folly and the beauty are blended; he does not jest in one mood and admire in another ; one occasion evokes both sentiments, and in his laughter there is no scorn. As he finds wisdom and folly united in actual life, he has no hesitation in presenting the same blend in his art, which he has found in his philosophy. 167 CHAPTER X. PHILOSOPHICAL MAXIMS. I. — Mines and Forges. The business of the philosopher, according to Bacon's view, may be divided into two departments — the one devoted to research, the other to refining, or working up material into fabric — in his picturesque language, digging in the mine, or working at the forge. The digger in the mine is called the Pioner, or, as we write it, pioneer. In the military language of his time, the soldier who digs under ground, the sapper or miner, is the pioner. This pioner stands in his mind as the symbol of the enquirer into truth. Early in life he was impressed with a saying of Democritus, that Truth did lie in deep pits; and in his failure to obtain occupation in the service of the State, he told his uncle, Lord Burghley, that he had almost resolved to " give over all care of service, and become some sorry book-maker, or a true pioner in that mine of truth which Democritus said lay so deep" ("Life," 1. log). The pioner is therefore, in Bacon's eyes, one who is working under- ground, digging for treasure, or — extending the signifi- cance of the word by analogy — it may be digging for treason or warfare; for the process of mining may be applied to undermining. To these several uses the word is applied by Bacon at different periods of his life. Thus in the year 1592, in his " Observations on a Libel," he writes : — " Nay, even at this instant, in the kingdom of Spain, notwithstanding the pioners do still work in the Spanish mines, the Jesuits must play the pioner and mine l68 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. into the Spaniards' purses, and, under colour of a ghostly exhortation, contrive the greatest exaction that ever was in any realm." In his speech, or charge, agai st Owen, he speaks of "Priests here, . . . which be so many pioners to undermine the State." In March, 1622, after his fall, he offers service to the King, saying, "I shall be glad to be a labourer, a pioner in your service." In the " History of Henry VII.," Bacon, speaking of the imperfect information available in reference to the Simnell plot, adds : — " We shall make our judgment upon the things themselves, as they give light to one another, and, as we can, dig truth out of the mine." And, describing the King's treatment of Perkin Warbeck's conspiracy, and the spies and enquirers he employed, he tells us : — " Others he employed in a more special nature and trust, to be his pioners in the main countermine." And, in a passage which we shall immediately shew to have a curious affinity with Shakespearean usage, he says that Henry em- ployed secret spials, because " he had such moles perpetually working and casting to undermine him." Also, Bacon says of Richard III. : — " Even in the time of King Edward, his brother, he was not without secret trains and mines to turn envy and hatred upon his brother's government." And, after describing some of the precautions taken by Henry against Perkin Warbeck's conspiracy, he adds : " But for the rest, he chose to work by countermine." We find that Bacon made an entry in his Proinus (1395), " Pioner in the mine of truth," as a hint worth remem- bering and storing as a help for invention; and we shall find that in this case, as in so many others, the purpose of the entry is partly explained by its reflection in Shake- speare. The word pioner, in its original, military use, is found in Henry V. The scene is at Harfleur and the siege is being prosecuted by help of mining operations. Gower asks, " How now. Captain Alacmorris, have you quit the mines ? have the pioners given o'er ? " (III. ii. gi). And the same DIGGING IN THE MINES. l6g sense is found in Othello III. iii. 345. " The general camp pioners and all " the miners and pioners being the soldiers of least estimation, to whom the hardest manual toil was assigned. The saying of Democritus must have been in the poet's mind, when he makes Polonius, eagerly volunteering service to the King, say, " I will find where truth is hid, though it were hid indeed within the centre." {Ham. II. ii. 157). And as Bacon calls these pioners and spies, moles, so the same figure is used by Shakespeare. The ghost has been seconding Hamlet's wish that the events of that night should be kept secret. " Swear ! " he says from below the ground : and again " Swear ! " after they had shifted their places ; on which Hamlet, his excitement making him almost hysterical, half laughing, half weeping, exclaims, Well said old Mole, can'st work i' the earth so fast ? A woiihy pioucr ! (Ham. I. V. 162). These words occur in the early Quarto of 1604. Bacon's division of philosophers into those who dig and those who refine, is very clearly reflected in one remark- able instance. First, let us see how Bacon himself ex- presses this distinction. In the 2nd Book of the "Advance- ment," we find the following : — " If then it be true that Democritus said. That the truth of nature lieth hid in certain deep mines and caves ; and if it be true likewise that the Alchemists do so much inculcate, that Vulcan IS a second nature, and imitateth that dexterously and compendiously which nature worketh by ambages and length of time ; it were good to divide natural philosophy into the mine and the furnace, and to m.ake two pro- fessions of natural philosophers, some to be pioners, and some smiths ; some to dig, and some to refine and hammer." (Works III. 351). Now when Dramatic art, ignoring the unities, brings on the stage a kingdom, a battle between countless combatants, I/O SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. or events that take years for their accompHshment — "Jump- ing o'er times, turning the accomplishment of many years into and hour-glass" {Hen. V. I. Prol.)— the poet does that which Vulcan is represented as doing, — he " imitates dexterously and compendiously that which nature worketh by ambages and length of time," his mind is the forge in which this fabric is wrought. And this conception of dramatic art is clearly expressed in the Prologue to the 5th Act of Henry V. Vouchsafe to those that have not read the story, That I may prompt them : and, of such as have, I humbly pray them to admit the excuse Of time, of numbers and due course of things, Which cannot in their huge and proper Hfe Be here presented. These lines express clearly the idea of Dramatic Art as overcoming the ambages of time and experience. And that this was actually in the poet's mind becomes perfectly clear in the subsequent repetition of the same sentiment: — But now behold In the quick forge and working house of thought. How London doth pour out her citizens, &c. This exactly corresponds to another statement of the same philosophical axiom : — " It is the duty and virtue of all knowledge to abridge the circuits and long ways of experi- ence (as much as truth will permit) and to remedy the ancient complaint that life is short and art is lo7ig." {Dc Aug. III. iv). Here then, we find Bacon's forge in Shakespeare long before it was published in the "Advancement." The forge re-appears frequently in both groups of writings. Bacon speaks of the "Wits of men, which are the shops wherein all actions are forged," and of the sanctuaries, where criminals found shelter as "the forges of all his troubles." In the poems we find "Come! to the forge with it then ; shape it ; I would not have things cool." NATURE CONTROLLED BY MIRx\CLE. 171 {Mer. W. IV. ii.) (last speech). " I should forge quarrels unjust against the good and loyal ; destroying them for wealth." {Much. IV. iii. 8i): and in other places. 2, — Miracles and Misery. Bacon's Essay of " Adversity " was not published till the last complete edition of the Essays appeared in 1625. It is one most often quoted as a specimen of his richest and most poetic style. Macaulay uses it to justify his criticism that Bacon's poetic fancies became more ample and exuberant as he grew older. The following passage occurs in it: — "Certainly, if miracles be the command over nature, they appear most in adversity : " — a short sentence, but one full of condensed wisdom. Notice in it two things : — 1. Bacon's definition of a miracle : the command over nature. 2. Bacon's philosophy of adversity: — it gives oppor- tunity for such self-denial and self-control as are equivalent to miracle, by the command over nature thus displayed. Here we find the philosophical or abstract sentiment. For a concrete illustration of the same we may turn to King Lear. In the second scene of the second act, Kent appears before Gloster's Castle. It is night. He has beaten the steward who had been insolent to the King. Regan and Cornwall appear. They overpower him, and put him in the stocks, and leave him there for the night. He is, now, in the deepest pit of adversity ; far from his friends ; in the power of his enemies, who are likely to torture or kill him as soon as morning comes, and he is taken out of the stocks. The situation would seem to justify the most utter despondency. But Kent rises above the situation. He had before said to the steward : "Though it be night, yet the moon shines; " and now by its light, which he calmly salutes as " comfortable beams,'" he reads a letter. He is astonished at his own almost 172 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. miraculous composure, aud soon after falls asleep. It is a miracle of command over nature. And so he regards it, for he meditatively exclaims, — " Nothing almost sees miracles But misery." {LcarU. ii. 172). Showing that (i) Bacon's definition of a miracle and (2) Bacon's philosophy of adversity, were both in his mind, although he does not expressly formulate them. The sentence as it stands is sybilline, and somewhat obscure. We cannot find a complete clue to Kent's meaning till we bring Bacon's Essay to help out the significance of it. And the reflection is so subtle and original that it must have come from the same mind that wrote the Essay ; which, observe, was published 17 years after the Quarto edition of the play, and nine years after Shakspere's death. But this does not complete the curious significance of this passage. King Lear was published in Quarto in 1608. In the early editions the same passage occurs, but in such a mutilated form that no conjecture, however sagacious, could ever have extracted the right reading from words which, even when amended, are rather enigmatical. The Quartos have, — " Nothing almost sees my -iiTackc But misery." This is almost nonsense. If "my wracke " is taken as the nominative to the verb sees in an inverted sentence — my wrecked state sees only misery before it — this is exactly what Kent does ]wt wish to express. For his whole behaviour, his sense of the "comfortable" quahty of the moonlight, his reading the letter by its imperfect light, and then going to sleep, shows that his mind is not occupied by his misery, but by the strange faculty of ignoring it which possesses him. My wracke is evidently a corruption of miracle. Who but the author could have supplied the emendation ? At no time could a transcen- ADVERSITY SEES MIRACLES. 173 dentalism of this character — a piece of mystic philosophy — have been " floating in the air." It must be noted that different copies of the Quartos vary, and in one the words my wracke are printed as my rackles. This approximation to the true reading is, I believe, only found in one copy, which is in the Bodleian Library. All the rest have 7ny wracke. The ready explanation of this will be that the Quarto was a surreptitious copy obtained from a shorthand writer's notes, and that the 1623 folio was printed from the author's own MS. Those who can be satisfied with this account of the genesis of the Quarto are welcome to their theory. To me it appears in the highest degree artificial and improbable. We know, however, from the peculiarities of the Northumberland House MS. that Bacon was in the habit of dictating to an amanuensis. It is certainly possible that Lear was so dictated for the 4to. edition. The mechanical clerk heard the word miracle, and did not rightly catch the word. The error was not detected, and remained uncorrected till the 1623 edition was published. The interpretation of this passage, which is sug- gested by the passage from Bacon's Essay, will, I think, commend itself to every thoughtful reader. It is obviously right. But it is not the interpretation which commentators have suggested. One of them paraphrases the passage thus : — " It is only when things are at their worst that Providence interposes with a miracle ; " a far more commonplace sentiment, and one also which does not exactly fit the words. For there is in them a profound reference to the vision which adversity sees, and which remains as a secret for itself. The rescue by miracle would be seen by others : the miracle here referred to is seen only by the subject of it. It is worth remark that the same definition of a miracle is found in the Essay on the " Vicissitude of Things," published in 1625, " For Martyrdoms I reckon them among miracles, because they seem to exceed the strength of human nature." 174 shakespeare studies in baconian light. 3, — Sunshine Everywhere. One of Bacon's frequently recurring aphorisms is that sunshine penetrates even dunghills and cloaca, and yet is not thereby defiled. So must it be with science and philosophy : its beams must visit the foulest as well as the most fragrant places, yet it still retains its purity, and the knowledge so gained ranks in value with other knowledge. For the sentiment has two aspects or facets : that relating to the study of evil or polluted things ; and that relating to the knowledge so derived. Thus, in the Novum Orgamun I. 120, Bacon vindicates for science the right, even the duty, to investigate even filthy things : — "And for things that are mean, or even filthy, things which (as Pliny says) must be introduced with an apology, such things, no less than the most splendid and costly, must be admitted into natural history. Mor is natural history polluted thereby, for the sun enters the sewer no less than the palace, yet takes no pollution. . . . W'hat- ever deserves to exist deserves also to be known, for knowledge is the image of existence ; and things mean and splendid exist alike. Moreover, as from certain putrid substances — musk for instance and civet — the sweetest odours are sometimes generated, so too from mean and sordid instances there sometimes emanates excellent light and information. But enough, and more than enough of this : such fastidiousness being merely childish and effeminate." The other side of this sentiment refers to the necessity for those who enter into human affairs to know the evil arts of bad men, as well as the pure arts of good men. In the third of the Mcditationes Sacrce this rule is well expounded, as follows : — " For men of corrupt understanding, that have lost all sound discerning of good and evil, come possessed with this prejudicate opinion, that they think all honesty and KNOWING THE DEEPS OF SATAN, 175 goodness proceedeth out of a simplicity of manners, and a kind of want of experience and unacquaintance with the affairs of the world." Therefore he infers that those who aspire to "a fructifying and begetting goodness, which should draw on others," should know the "deeps of Satan," — should be wise as serpents and harmless as doves. ' ' There are neither teeth nor stings, nor venom, nor wreaths and folds of serpents, which ought not to be all known, and, as far as examination doth lead, tried. Neither let any man here fear infection or pollution : for the sun entereth into sinks and is not defiled." Bacon very frequently enforces the same axiom, and it is usually illustrated by the universality of sunshine, which is equally pure, whether it lights on sweetness or on carrion. Bacon's illustration of the sweet scent called civet being derived from the mephitic civet cat, is echoed in Shake- speare. Lear in his madness exclaims, " Give me an ounce of civet, good apothecary, to sweeten my imagination." {Lear IV. vi. 131). And the King in his earlier and more sane mood had said : " Thou owest the worm no silk, the beast no hide, the sheep no wool, the cat no perfume." {lb. III. iv. 108). And with a similar reference Touch- stone says: "Civet is of a baser birth than tar, the very uncleanly flux of a cat." {As You Like It III. ii. 60). The philosophical attitude towards things evil is very accurately expressed by Falconbridge, the Bastard, in King John, who proposes to himself to study the arts by which men rise, bad and good ; not that he may imitate them, but be prepared either to use or to thwart them. For he is but a bastard to the time That doth not smack of observation ; (And so am I, whether I smack or no); And not alone in habit and device, Exterior form, outward accoutrement, But from the inward motion to deliver Sweet, sweet, sweet poison for the age's tooth; Which, though I will not practise to deceive, 176 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Yet, to avoid deceit, I mean to learn : For it shall strew the footsteps of my rising, {John I. i. 207). In other words, Falconbridge resolves to know as Bacon even more poetically expresses it, all the deeps of Satan, the stings, the venom, the serpentine wreaths which must be known by any one who aspires to govern others. Sir Walter Scott quotes part of this passage to illustrate the maxim, "There is much in life which we must see, were it only to shun it." (See " Fortunes of Nigel," Chap. XII). The axiom that everything must be known, evil as well as good, is used in justification of the wild young Prince Hal, who associates with low company for this very laudable purpose : — The prince but studies his companions. Like a strange tongue, wherein, to gain the language, 'Tis needful that the most immodest word Be look'd upon and learn'd : whicli once attain'd. Your Highness knows, comes to no further use, But to be known and hated . . . their memor}^ Shall as a pattern or a measure live By which his grace must mete the lives of others. Turning past evils to advantages. (2 Hen. IV. IV. iv. 70). The universality of sunshine is also referred to. Thus Henry V., when in camp at Agincourt, visits and talks to the rank and file of his army, as well as to his friends or the nobles and officers : — A largess universal, like the sun. His liberal eye doth give to everyone. (Hen. V. IV., Prol. 43). The lost and unrecognized Princess, Perdita, finds excellent use for the same law at once of nature and of thought, when the king discovers that his son is her accepted lover, and threatens fierce vengeance on her and the family which has adopted her : — PHILOSOPHY AND POETRY UNITED. 177 I was not much afear'd ; for once or twice I was about to speak, and tell him plainly The self same sun that shines upon his court Hides not his visage from our cottage, but Looks on alike. {Winter's Tale IV. iv. 453). Here we have a near approach to Bacon's mode of referring to the universality of sunshine, its equal radiance in cottages and palaces, in sewers and in temples. This point of view is also clearly reflected in Shakespeare. The sun shining on a dunghill is humourously alluded to in Merry Wives. Falstaff, flattering himself that Mistress Page looks favourably on him, says, "Sometimes the beam of her view gilded my foot, sometimes my portly belly ; " and on this, Pistol makes the saucy comment — Then did the sun on dunghill shine. {Merry Wives I. iii. 70). There is also a very subtle allusion to this maxim in Twelfth Night III. i. 43. The clown replies to Viola, who had told him that she had seen him lately at Count Orsino's : " Foolery, sir, doth walk about the orb like the sun : which shines everywhere," implying that it is the privilege of a clown to make his comments on everything, he may visit palaces as well as cottages, and moralise on trifles which serious persons would disdain to notice. This is one of the functions of Shakespeare's fools, to bring philosophy from the heights of heaven to the lowliest levels of earth. Lear's fool illustrates this, and his gibes and jests contain a large amount of Baconian philosophy. The same charter of freedom for folly, in its comments and moralising is claimed by Jacques. He has been listening to Touchstone's talk, and envies him his freedom of discourse : — that I were a fool, I am ambitious for a motley coat .... it is my only suit. 1 must have liberty. Withal, as large a charter as the wind, To blow on whom I please, for so fools have. {As You Like It II. vii. 42 178 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Here we see the identification of philosophy and homehest common sense — the reflection of Bacon's Hfe- long mission, to rescue philosophy from the subtleties of the schools, and bring it into relation with all that concerns the " business and the bosoms " of men. 4. The Genesis of Poetry. One of Bacon's remarks about poetry is very striking and original. In his "Advancement of Learning," he is very busy cataloguing the deficiencies in science and study, that have yet to be supplied. Poetry, however, is not a deficient, it grows spontaneously everywhere: — "In this part of learning [he says], I can report no deficience. For being a plant that cometh of the lust of the earth without a formal seed, it hath sprung up and spread abroad more than any other kind." (Works III. 346). This very peculiar description of the Natural History of Poetry is exactly re-produced in Timon of Athens. But the " plant without a formal seed " is not referred to in general terms ; it is named. It is a gum, growing without seed, which breaks out unbidden on the surface where it is found. In Timon it is the poet himself who thus describes the growth of his art : A thing slipp'd idly from me : Our poesy is as a gum which oozes From whence 'tis nourished. The fire i' the flint Shows not till it be struck : our gentle flame Provokes itself, and like the current flies Each bound it chafes. (Timoii I. i. 20). The words "a thing slipp'd idly from me," bring up by natural association that theory of the birth of poetry which the poet-philosopher had already formed in his mind. It is a plant growing spontaneously in a luxuriant soil, \ coming "of the lust of the earth," not sown, a birth of the soil itself, a gum which oozes from the surface which nourishes it, a self-ignited flame kindled by a stroke, a stream that bounds along by an irresistible current. It THE SPREAD OF MONEY. 179 does not matter which metaphor we use ; all express the same idea. If, however, the analogy of a seedless plant is the original form of the conception, it could not be more felicitously transfigured than by its metamorphosis into a gum which oozes from the exuberant sap of the tree on which it grows, springing really from the lust of the special plot of earth which nourishes it. Bacon's account of the genesis of poetry is itself poetry of the richest quality ; and although expressed in prose, it is, as the play shews, easily transformed into poetry full of music and metaphor. There is no impassable chasm be- tween the two, and there is no antecedent improbability in the idea that both forms of expression, the prose and the poetic, were used by the same mind. 5. — Money and Muck. Bacon often alludes to the principle that money ought not to be monopolized by a few, but spread, like garden compost or manure, over the state, for the enriching of the many. In his " Paper of Advice " as to the application of Sutton's estate, he says: — "Thus have I briefly delivered unto your Majesty my opinion touching the employment of this charity, whereby the mass of wealth that was in the owner little better than a stack or heap of muck, may be spread over your king- dom to many fruitful purposes." (" Life," IV. 254). In the Essay of " Seditions " we find the same policy advocated : — "Above all things good policy is to be used that the treasures and monies of a State be not gathered into few hands. For otherwise a State may have a great stock and yet starve ; and money is like muck, not good except it be spread." And in the Apophthegms he tells us : " Mr. Bettenham used to say, That riches were like muck : when it lay upon an heap, it gave but a stench and ill odour ; but when it was spread upon the ground then it was cause of much fruit." (Ap. 252, Works VII. 160). l80 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Now it is not a little significant that the word muck occurs only once in Shakespeare, and in this passage Bacon's maxim has not been recognised by the commenta- tors, although it is certainly present — and when applied, gives new interest and meaning to the passage. The virtues and merits of Coriolanus are being described, in order that he may be worthily honoured. Cominius puts. a climax on his catalogue by telling of his indifference to wealth, and the spoils of war : — Our spoils he kick'd at, And look'd upon things precious, as the}' were The common muck of the world. (^Cor. II. ii. 128). The only comment on this which I have been able to find is a suggestion that muck is equivalent to vilia reriim. The poet certainly intended to suggest a good deal more- than this, but the rich suggestiveness of the passage cannot be easily brought out if Bacon's use of the word is not remembered. The words themselves may express only a conventional contempt for riches, which may be either noble- and disinterested, or insincere and fantastical, or unreflec- *.ive and morbid, or far-seeing and patriotic. Now Coriolanus was a Statesman, as it is evident Shakespeare was; and he is accustomed to regard not only the value,, or the accumulation, but also the distribution of money.. The poet represents his hero as refusing to heap up riches, for himself, because he looked on a nation's wealth as good) only when it is spread over the kingdom for many fruitful^ purposes; and likely to diffuse an ill odour if it is too much concentrated in a heap. This is the true inwardness of the- "villa rcrum" — wealth is not rubbish, but manure. 6. — Past and Future. Bacon often dwells on the rival claims of antiquitv andi the present time — the ceaseless strife between old and new. His invariable policy is to shew reverence to what is. STANDING YET MOVING. l8l established, while not hesitating to go beyond and if neces- sary to abandon it. So Tennyson tells us that "Men may rise on stepping stones of their dead selves to higher things. " The following passage gives a fair representation of his teaching. It is from the "Pacification of the Church:" — " It is excellently said by the prophet, State super vias antiquas, et videte qucenani sint recta et vera, ct ambulate in eis ; so as he doth not say State super vias antiquas et ambulate in eis; for it is true that with all wise and mode- rate persons custom and usage obtaineth that reverence, as it is sufficient matter to move them to make a stand, and discover, and take a view; but it is no warrant to guide or conduct them : a just ground, I say, it is of deliberation but not of direction." (" Life," III. 105). The same sentiment in almost the same words is found in the Essay of "Innovations," in the "Advancement." (Works III. 291), and elsewhere. I am persuaded that the same idea is secreted in the rather cryptic words of Salisbury, when he is anticipating the changes in the State that are impending after Melun's rebellion is ended : — Away, my friends ! New flight ! And happy newness iliat intends old right. ('John V. iv. 60). Intend is a very strong word, peculiarly used, in Shake- speare. The vernacular sense which contemplates the future is included with the classic sense which looks with fixed and thoughtful gaze on the present. (See the section on intend in Chapter xiv. The classic language of Shake- speare.) It exactly combines this significance of the two Latin words, State and videte : make a stand, and take a direction; it connotes a mental pause and a prepara- tion for new action. Nothing could possibly be more felicitous than the introduction of this Latin word to ex- press the meaning which Bacon is accustomed to express by the combination of two words. Doubtless this is a subtle interpretation; but when Bacon's idea is brought into l82 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. relation with the passage, the interpretation is not far fetched — it is easy and natural ; and by this conjunction of Bacon with Shakespeare, the words of the poet gather fuller meaning and greatly augmented interest. 7. — Impossibilities. Bacon constantly asserts that no effective advance in science can be made, unless new methods of investigation are used. " For no man can be so dull as to believe that what has never yet been done can be done, except by means hitherto unattempted." (" Hist. Life and Death," Works V. 267). He preaches a noble discontent : — " Men do not rightly understand either their store or their strength, but over-rate the one and under-rate the other." " Whatever any art fails to attain, they set down as impossible of attainment " (Preface to Novum Organum). This canon of impossibility he is never tired of resisting. Two classical passages, one from Virgil, the other from Livy, are repeatedly produced in this argument. Possunt quia posse videntit^r — what seems possible becomes possible. And NihU airAcl qua'n bene austis Vana contenmere : refer- ring to Alexander the Great — all he did was to venture greatly and despise idle apprehensions. One reason for the stationary condition of the sciences is that "the logicians receive as conclusive the immediate information of the sense." But "the testimony and information of the sense has reference always to man, not to the universe; and it is a great error to assert that sense is the measure of things." These maxims are often repeated and much amplified in Bacon's writings; but for my immediate purpose these expressions of them are sufficient. It seems to me that the writer of AlVs Well that Ends Well had these principles in view when he represents the cure, in the case of the King, of a disease which all his physicians had pronounced incurable. He hath abandoned his physicians, under whose practices he hatli SUCCESS BY VENTURING. 183 persecuted time with liope, and finds no otlier advantage in the process, but only the losing of hope by time. {All's Well I. i. 12). The central thought of AlTs Well is — Possunt quia posse videntur. Helena has a remedy which she knows is likely to be effectual, and she scouts the assumption of impossibility which the physicians had pronounced ; who made their own senses and attainments the measure of things and the limits of possibility : — The fated sky Gives us free scope, only doth backward pull Our slow designs when we ourselves are dull . . . Impossible be strange attempts to those That weigh their pains in sense, and do suppose What hath been cannot be. {lb. I. i. 239). It is not so with Him that all things knows As 'tis with us that square our guess by shows. {lb. II. i. 152). And what impossibility would slay In common sense, sense saves another way. {lb. 180). In these passages we may recognize the idea expressed in the 6th Axiom of Novum Organum I. : — "Insanum I quiddam esset, et in se contrarium, existimare ea, quae adhunc nunquam facta sunt fieri posse, nisi per modos adhunc nunquam tentatos." "It is a wild and self- \ contradictory fancy to suppose that those things which have never been accomplished can be done at all except by the use of methods hitherto untried." What is impossible by ordinary procedure becomes possible when we can find out " another way " of acting. The rather obscure passage in Shakespeare is thus interpreted by Bacon, and is not easily explained except by reference to his " modos adhunc nunquam tentatos." Moreover, what the poet means by common sense must be ascertained by reference to Bacon's philosophical expression of the same idea. It is the immediate apprehension of the senses. 184 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. The bene ausus contemcre finds expression in another play. Lucio remonstrates with Isabella for underrating her own power. Assay the power you have. Isab. — My power ? Alas I doubt — Lucio. — Our doubts are traitors, And make us lose the good we oft might win By fearing to attempt. {Mcas.for Meas. I. iv. 76). And in Venus and Adonis, the poet himself, moralizing on the situation, says (567) : — Things out of hope are compass'd oft with venturing. The identity of the philosophical sentiments of the poet with those of the philosopher cannot be mistaken. 8.— Physiognomy. In Bacon's survey of the sciences, he is careful to note any branch of science which ought to be or might be pursued, but which has been neglected. Among these "deficients," he names Physiognomy, which, he says, "discovers the dispositions of the mind by the lineaments of the body." These "lineaments of the body disclose the dispositions and inclinations of the mind in general ; but the motions and gestures of the countenance .... disclose also the present humour of the mind and will." The fact that this deficiency exists is noticed also, in apparently a very casual way, in Macbeth, when Duncan says of the Thane of Cawdor — There's no art to find the mind's construction in the face. (Macb. I. iv. 11). I do not think this philosophical fact is blurted out by accident ; the poet knew exactly what his words implied. He was even more a philosopher than a poet, and had evidently taken exceptional interest in Physiognomy. In other places he refers to this art : — THE FACE AND THE HEART. 185 O, what may man within him hide, Though angel on the outward side. {Meas.for Meas. III. ii. 285). Queen Catherine had some notions of physiognomy in her mind when she told the cardinals : Ye have angels' faces, but heaven knows your hearts. {Hen. VIII. III. i. 145). Shakespeare, like Bacon, believed that the motions and gestures of the face disclose the present humour and state of the mind and will, whether we can interpret these motions or not. For he says, All men's faces are true, whatsoe'er their hands are. {Ant. CI CO. II. vi. 102). And Macbeth knows that crime writes itself on the features, and that the countenance of guilt must put on falsity. False face must hide what this false heart doth know. {Macb. I. vii. 82). Still more clearly in Lucrece is the art alluded to. Lucrece is looking at a picture, a piece of skilful painting, made for Priam's Troy and some of the "thousand lament- able objects there," to which. In scorn of Nature Art gave lifeless life, are vividly described : among the rest, — In Ajax and Ulysses, O, what art Of phvsiognomy might one behold ! The face of either ciphered either's heart ; Their face their manners most expressly told : In Ajax' eyes blunt rage and rigour roird ; But the mild glance that sly Ulysses lent, Show'd deep regard and smiling government. (See Lucrece 1366-1400). g. — Sleep. Bacon's ideas about sleep are very characteristic. He often gives expression to two of them : ist. Sleep is a l86 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. nourisher, it feeds the body ; 2nd, Afternoon sleep is very salutary, especially for elderly and infirm persons. As to the nourishing property of sleep, he says: "As exercise demands more nourishment, so likewise sleep to a certain extent supplies it." ("Hist. Life and Death"). Again, "Sleep nourisheth, or at least preserveth bodies a long time without other nourishment. Beasts that sleep in winter, as is noted in wild bears, during their sleep wax very fat, though they eat nothing." {Syl. Syl. 746). In another of his natural history notes (57) he says that " sleep doth nourish much." This property of sleep is used metaphorically in one of the Antitheta concerning loquacity. "Silence, like a sleep, nourishes wisdom (or prudence)." " Silentium, veluti somnus quidam, alit prudentiam." {De Aug. VI. iii., Ant. 31). As to the second property of sleep, — its benefit in the afternoon to weak or elderly persons, — he writes: — "In aged men and weak bodies, and such as abound not in choler, a short sleep after dinner doth help to nourish.''' The two points, it may be observed, are here combined. And again, in his Com. Sol., as to sleep, " Immediately after dinner, or at four of the clock, I could never yet find resolution and strength enough in myself to inhibit it." ("Life" IV. 79). These maxims both interpret and augment the meaning of several passages in Shakespeare. For instance, when he calls sleep "Nature's soft nurse " (2 Hen. IV. III. i. 6), he means not only a watcher or a servant, but a nursing mother, with well-stored breasts : and we can by this light (and by this only) understand why Macbeth calls sleep. Great Nature's second course, chief nourisher in life's feast. (Macb. II. ii. 38). These words are intended to express, not merely poetic fancies, but scientific facts. As to the second point, we remember how the Ghost in NATURE GOVERNS ART. 187 Hamlet narrates to young Hamlet the manner of his death: he had been poisoned when, — Sleeping within n\\ orchard, My custom always of the afternoon. (Ham. I. V. 59). And in the Tempest, Cahban, plotting to murder Prospero, knows that his best opportunity will be in the afternoon, when he is taking his usual nap : — 'Tis a custom with him i' the afternoon to sleep. (Temp. III. ii. 94) 10. — Nature and Art. We in this nineteenth century are accustomed to think of the works or effects of Art as being merely the result of bringing human faculties to work in the moulding or appli- cation of the matter and force supplied by Nature. But Bacon tells us that up to his time, Art and Nature had been contrasted as different from one another : and when he set down the "History of the Arts" as a species of Natural History, he considered that he was running counter to prevalent opinion. " I am the rather induced to set down the history of arts as a species of natural history, because it is the fashion to talk as if art were something different from nature, so that things artificial should be separated from things natural, as differing totally in kind. . . Whereas men ought on the contrary to have a settled conviction, that things artificial differ from things natural, not in form or essence, but only in the efficient ; that man has in truth no power over nature except that of motion . . . the rest is done by nature working within." ("Intell. Globe." Works V. 506). This theory, which Bacon claims as original, is most exactly expressed by Shakespeare : — Nature is made better by no mean But Nature makes that mean ; so over that art Which you say adds to Nature, is an art That nature makes ; . . . this is an art l88 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Which does niend nature, change it rather, hut The art itself is nature. (IT. Talc. IV. iv. 89). This is the only passage in Shakespeare where this axiom is formally expressed, and it is all the more significant because it is placed in immediate relation with the remarkable list of flowers which is so curiously identical with the same list, similarly grouped, and similarly classified in Bacon's Essay of "Gardens," published in 1625. Mr. Spedding was the first to draw attention to this striking coincidence. It has been repeatedly referred to since the publication of his Edition of Bacon's works. His language is worth quoting: "The scene in the Winter's Tale where Perdita presents the guests with flowers suited to their ages, has some expressions, which, if this Essay had been contained in the earlier edition, would, have made me suspect that Shakespeare had been reading it. As I am not aware that the resemblance has been observed, I will quote the passages to which I allude in connection with those which remind me of them." Spedding has no explanation to offer ; certainly some is required. This Baconian garland is so well known that I need not reproduce it. II. — Nature and Fortune. Bacon frequently draws a contrast between the gifts of nature and those of fortune : especially when he is con- templating the characters and careers of royal personages. The whole of the dedication of the " Advancement of Learning " to King James is taken up with a ceremonial and laudatory description of the "parts of virtue and fortune " belonging to the royal personage. He follows this into most exquisite detail. "And as in your Civil Estate there appeareth to be an emulation and contention of your Majesty's virtue with your fortune, a virtuous disposition with a fortunate regiment ; a virtuous expecta- tion (when time was) of your greater fortune, with a NATURE AND FORTUNE HAND IN HAND. 189 prosperous possession thereof in due time ; a virtuous observation of the laws of marriage, with most blessed and happy fruit of marriage ; a virtuous and most Christian desire of peace, with a fortunate inclination in your neigh- bour princes thereunto ; so likewise in these intellectual matters, there seemeth to be no less contention between the excellency of your Majesty's gifts of Nature and the universality and perfection of your learning." — (Works, III. 262). The same contrast is the leading motive of the Eulog}- on Queen Elizabeth. The opening sentence gives the key-note of the whole piece. "Elizabeth both in her nature and fortune, was a wonderful person among women [Nature], a memorable person among princes " [Fortune], (Works, VI. 305). And at the close he sums up with the characteristic words, " So little was she disposed to borrow anything of her fortune to the credit of her virtue." (p. 318). The same contrast is implied in the three Essays, 38, 39, and 40, of " Nature in Man," of " Custom and Education," and of " Fortune." Shakespeare is equally partial to the same contrast, especially when he too is contemplating the qualities and careers of high persons. Constance, describing the qualities and fortunes of her son Prince Arthur, says : — But thou art fair, and at thy birth, dear boy Nature and Fortune join'd to make thee great. Of Nature's gifts thou may'st with lilies boast, And with the half-blown rose. But Fortune, O She is corrupted, clianged and won from thee. {John III. i. 51). Brutus, has for Caesar, whom he has just slain, — Tears for his love; joy for his fortune ; honour for his valour ; and death for his ambition. — Jul. Civs. III. ii. 29. Enobarbus philosophises with much depth of wisdom on the rash course of Antony which led to his destruction : I see men's judgments are A parcel of tlieir fortunes; and things outward igo SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. I Do draw the inward quality after them. {Ant. Cli-o. III. xiii. 31). Dogberry has a glimmering, topsy-turvy perception of the same contrast : To be a well favoured man is the gift of fortune, but to read and write comes bv nature. (Much Ado III. in. is). Rosahnd is of the same opinion, without the confusion : Fortune reigns in the gifts of the world, not in the lineaments of nature. {--i^ yon I^ikc I. ii. 44) : and there is much more to the same effect in the context. Now, it is not a httle significant that the mental attitude here indicated is much more characteristic of Roman and Latin philosophy than of Christian philosophy. It is adopted by the Elizabethan philosopher and poet because his mind was saturated with such philosophy as Cicero and other Latin writers habitually enforce. The following is a specimen of this kind of sentiment : — Sed tamen alterius partis periculum, Sertorianae atque Hispaniensis, quas multo plus fiirmamenti ac roboris habebat, Cn Pompeii divino consilio ac smgulari virtute depulsum est ; in altera parte ita res a L. Lucullo summo viro est administrata, ut initia ilia rerum gestarum magna atque pras clara non felicitati ejus, sed virtuti, haec autem extrema, quae nuper acciderunt non culpa, sed fortuncc ,i!rt6;^6'n^rt esse videantur. — 'Cic De Imperio Cn Pompeii Oratio, 4." Which may be translated : But yet the danger in one quarter from Sertorius and the Spaniards, which affair was possessed of more endurance and vitality, was warded off by the more than human wisdom and singular valour of Cneius Pompey ; while in the other quarter, affairs were so handled by that most capable man L. Lucullus, that the first events in the campaign, great and brilliant though the}^ were, were due not to his good fortune but to his valour, whilst those events THE CENTRE OF MOVEMENT. I9I which have lately befallen, appear to be due not to an}- fault on his part but to the caprice of fortune. 12. — Primum Mobile. In the Promiis, No. 1452, Bacon makes a note of the Primum mobile as suitable for literary use: ^^ Primum mobile turns about all the rest of the orbs." The Primum mobile is that movement which every celestial body derives from the central body about which its orbit is fixed. Every such body has also its own independent motion referable only to causes affecting itself. The King is the source of Primum mobile to all his subjects: "Those that he useth as his substitutes move wholly in his motion." ("Life" IV. 285). When this centre no longer attracts, disloyalty results. " Though my Lady should have put on a mind to continue her loyalty, as Nature and duty did bind her, yet when she was in another sphere, she must have moved in the motion of that orb, and not of the planet itself," referring, I believe, to Lady Arabella Stuart. ("Life" IV. 298). This is the advice which Bacon gives to the Judges : — "You that are Judges of circuits, are as it were the planets of the kingdom. ... Do therefore as they (the planets) do ; move always and be carried with the motion of your first mover, which is your sovereign. A popular Judge is a deformed thing ; and plaudites are fitter for players than magistrates." (" Life" VI. 211). On this principle, Bacon was ready, if needs be, to acquiesce in that which he disapproved. He advises Buckingham to act on this principle. "My Lord, you owe in this matter two debts to the King. The one " [if you disapprove of the Spanish match, to say so, and shew your reason]; "the other, that if the King in his high judgment, or the Prince in his settled affection, be resolved to have it go on, that you move in their orb so far as they shall lay it upon you." {lb. VII. 449). This principle is naturally used in the Essay of "Seditions," which may arise when reverence of ig2 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. government is lost and great persons "move violently in their own particular motion." It is used to explain the pernicious influence of superstition: "Atheism leaves a man to sense, to philosophy, to natural piety, to laws, to reputation .... but superstition dismounts all these, and erecteth an absolute monarchy in the minds of men .... a new priinuin mobile that ravisheth all the spheres of government." This accounts for the injury done to the State by " Wisdom for a man's self." " It is a poor centre of a man's actions, himself. It is right Earth [terrestial, not celestial]. For that only stands fast upon its own centre : whereas all things that have affinity with the heavens move upon the centre of another, which they benefit." A similar application is made in the Essay of "Faction." This idea is expressed with the same emphasis in Shake- speare. Luciana, remonstrating with the Syracusan fac simile of her sister's husband says : — We in your motion turn, and you may move us. {Com. Er. III. ii. 24). Antony, justifying his contempt for Lepidus, the "slight unmeritable man," whom Octavius claims to be "a. tried and valiant soldier " : — So is my horse, Octavius. . . . It is a creature that I teach to fight, To wind, to stop, to run directly on, His corporal motion govern'd by my spirit. {Jul. Civs. IV. i. 29). Prince Henry will not brook rivalry or comparison with Hotspur, — I am tlie Prince of Wales, and think not, Percy, To share with me in glory any more. Two stars keep not their motion in one sphere. Nor can one England brook a double reign Of Harry Percy and the Prince of Wales. (i Hen. IV. V. iv. 63). PLANETARY MOVEMENT. 193 The same idea is put into the mouth of Marlowe's Edward II., when abdicating : — Here, take my crown ; the life of Edward too. Two Kings in England cannot reign at once. {Edward 11. V. i. 57). The usurping king in Hamlet, describes his queen, Hamlet's mother : — The queen, his mother, Lives almost by his looks ; and for myself — My virtue or my plague, be it either which, — She's so conjunctive to my life and soul, That, as the star moves not but in his sphere, I could not but by her. [Haul. IV. vii. 11). This was the kind of attraction by which Helena is drawn to Bertram : — I am undone : there is no living, none, If Bertram be away. Twere all one That I should love a bright particular star And think to wed it, he is so above me : In his bright radiance and collateral light Must I be comforted, not in his sphere. {All's Well I. i. 96). Shakespeare's opinion about sedition is much the same as Bacon's. Kmg Henry IV. asks the rebels,— Will you again unknit This churlish knot of all-abhorred war ? And move in that obedient orb again Where you did give a fair and natural light ? (I Hen. IV. V. i. 15.) Falconbridge, addressing certain nobles who had re- volted, but returned to allegiance, says, — Now, now, ye stars that move in your right spheres, Where be your powers ? {John V. vii. 74). 194 shakespeare studies in baconian light. 13. — Philosophia Prima. The laws of Nature, which are also the laws of life and thought, which are exemplified in the Primiim Mobile belong properly to Bacon's Philosophia prima, some specimens of which may be now given. Bacon was greatly interested in the Maxims of Philo- sophia prima — universal laws, applicable to all forms and spheres of being — true for mathematics, for physics, for ethics, for policy. In this respect Bacon's mind evidently had an element of mysticism in its composition. For he will not allow these "correspondences between the archi- tectures and fabrics of things natural and things civil " to be only similitudes, or fancies, "but plainly the same foot- steps of nature treading or printing upon different subjects," which is a close approximation to Swedenborg's doctrine of correspondences. One of these maxims is, "In nature things move violently to their place, and calmly in their place. So virtue in ambition is violent, in authority, settled and calm." (See Essay of "Great Place." Anti- theta on "Office.") This law of the highest Philosophy is certainly referred to in the words, — All things that are i_ Are with more spirit chased than enjoyed. {Mcr. Yen. II. vi. 12). The whole passage is so strikingly in accordance with the spirit and idea of Bacon's Philosophia prima, that it may be added to the specimens which he gives in the " Advance- ment " and De Aug. III. ii. ; Works I. 540, III. 346, IV. 337. It should also be noted that Bacon gives several of these specimens because the scientific discussion of this philosophy is entirely neglected — there is a "mere and deep silence " upon it — it is as a branch of science, non-existant. This gives a deeper significance to the illus- trations of the same Philosophy in Shakespeare — specimens evidently given with a perfect consciousness of their philo- sophical import, being such "profitable observations and MYSTIC CORRESPONDENCIES. IQS axioms as fall not within the compass of any of the special parts of philosophy or science, but are more common, and of a higher stage." The entire passage is as follows : — Gratia no. — It is marvel he outdwells his hour, For lovers ever run before the clock, Salarino. — O, ten times faster Venus' pigeons fly To seal love's bonds, new-made, than they are wont To keep obliged faith unforfeited ! Graiiano. — That ever holds. Who riseth from a feast With tliat keen appetite that he sits down ? WHiere is the horse that doth untread again His tedious measures with the unbated fire That he did pace them first ? All things that are Are with more spirit chased than enjoyed. How like a younker or a prodigal The scarfed bark puts from her native bay, Hugg'd and embraced by the strumpet wind. How like the prodigal doth she return With over-weather'd ribbs and ragged sails. Lean, rent, and beggar'd by the strumpet wind. If anyone hesitates as to the possibility of admitting such fancies as these into grave philosophical discussion, let him compare them with the dozen illustrations of "Persian Magic " given in De Aug. III. ii. Every one of these illustrations is quite as remote from our conceptions as to the sort of wares a philosopher should deal in as the specimens given by Salarino and Gratiano. I cannot my- self doubt that the same intention of discussing grave moral and political questions by the methods of the Philosophia prima is to be recognised in the marvellous discourses of Agamemnon, Nestor and Ulysses in Tro. Cres. I. iii. Various types of " checks and disasters " shew the "correspondences between the architectures and fabrics of things natural and things civil," — the reproof of chance which shews the true proof of men is seen in ships and trees and cattle as much as in men, — the universal principle that neglect of "degree, priority, place, insisture, course, proportion, season, form, office and custom, in all Tg6 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. line of order" brings disaster and ruin, is to be seen in planets, storms, seas, rivers, the fixity and calm of Nature, as well as in armies, states, families, factions, schools, brotherhoods, commerce : and all of these are so many pages and sections of the Philosophia prima, so many contributions to the supply of its deficiencies. The majestic speeches in this marvellous play are full of this philosophy. Sometimes the analogy which is raised to the dignity of Natural law, is not entirely in agreement with facts. A most remarkable illustration is the following: — On the accession of Henry V. to the throne, there is a scene in which the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Ely are speaking of the " blessed change " from wild prince Hal, to the wise, sagacious, and truly noble monarch. The prince who had been addicted to riotous company is now a pattern to the wisest. How has the change come about ? The Bishop replies : — The strawberry grows underneath the nettle, And wholesome berries thrive and ripen best ■ Neighbour d by fruit of baser qualit}'. And so the prince obscured his contemplation Under the veil of wildness ; which no doubt Grew like the summer grass, fastest by night, Unseen vet crescive in his faculty. (Hen. r. I. i. 60). The horticulture of this passage is very doubtful ; yet it is exactly expounded in the Sylva Sylvanun, where we find a chapter on experiments in "Consort" touching the sympathy and antipathy of things, and this is one of the illustrations. "Wheresoever one plant draweth such a particular juice out of the earth as it qualifieth the earth, so as that juice which remaineth is fit for the other plant, there the neighbourhood [mark the word] doeth good, because the nourishments are contrary or several : but where two plants draw much the same juice then the neighbourhood hurteth." The idea is that the sweet fruit FANTASTIC HORTICULTURE. 197 monopolizes the sweet producing qualities of the soil, and flourishes better if the nearest plants do not produce sweetness, but something else, — the contrasted quality of the plants is advantageous to each. See Syl. Syl. 480 — 491. The same idea is thus expressed in the Novum Organon : *' If it be said that there is consent [consensus] and friend- ship between corn and the corn-cockle or wild poppy, because these herbs hardly come up except in ploughed fields, it should rather be said that there is enmity between them, because the poppy and corn-cockle are emitted and generated from a juice of the earth which the corn has left and rejected, so that sowing the ground with corn prepares it for their growth." {Nov. Org. II. 50). Another physiological doctrine was that life may be prolonged by medicine : some drugs being capable of warding off dissolution, even though they do not cure disease, or give any other benefit. "The third part of medicine which I have set down is that which relates to the Prolongation of life, which is new and deficient, and the most noble of all," and he proceeds to supply "admonitions, directions and precepts." {Dc Aug. IV. ii). This gives a much needed key to the extent of meaning in the following lines, — B}' medicine life may be prolong'd, yet Death Will seize the doctor too. {Cyinb. V. v. 29). The significance of this is all the greater, when we observe that Bacon refers to this department of medical art as one that is neglected, deficient, and almost forgotten. Conclusion, — Philosophical Maxims. The correspondences both in thought and expression given in this chapter are of a very significant character. They are not mere chance repetitions of current ideas, the common property of all literary persons, winged creatures flying in the air for any one to catch and cage. It is easy to ig8 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. toss them aside with these explanations; but those who use them are bound to enter into detail and point out some at least of the common sources whence they are derived. It is not for us to prove the negative contention that they were not current commonplaces at the time they were produced. If they were it cannot be difficult for those who take the affirmative position to prove that. It should, however, be noticed that even if some casual approximation to the same ideas and expressions may be found in other writers, yet in their Shakespearean setting they are so characteristically Baconian that no well-informed person hesitates to attri- bute them to him, as specially characteristic of his mind and thought. We may claim for Bacon certain patent rights in his mines and forges, — in the sunshine which visits the vilest places, — in his special mode of affirming the fertilizing uses of money, — in his use o{ possnnt quia posse videntur, — in the nourishment which he finds in his afternoon sleep, — in his resolute identification of Art and Nature, — and in the strange poetic fancies of his Philosophia Prima : and so on through a countless number of such instances as are supplied by the Proinus, and in the echoes and correspondencies which are pointed out in the next two chapters. Some of these characteristically Baconian utterances have become current since his day. No one now refers the title of Charles Dickens' "Household Words " to Shakespeare. When we use Shakespeare's immortal words about bringing taper-light to garnish sun- light, we do not trace it to Bacon's mem.orandum To help the Sun with lanterns. We are the careless inheritors of a great literary estate, and we forget our illustrious ancestor who won it for us : the trees he planted seem to our unreflective eyes to be self-sown. As soon as all the items of this vast literary property are labelled with the names of their original inventors the names of Bacon and Shakespeare are so intrinsically and organically united that it is impossible to separate them, and the identity of the two is almost demonstrated. rgg CHAPTER XI. THE PROMUS. In this and the following chapter, I wish to bring together a number of striking correspondences between the lan- guage or the thought of Bacon and that of Shakespeare. And first of all we must open the Projuus and form a general conception of its purpose, and its significance as an argument for the Baconian authorship of Shakespeare. The Proinus is a collection of Notes and Hints for literary use : seeds of thought ; studies in composition ; it is the common place book of a scholar who is also an author. In it we find a large collection of proverbs in English, French, Spanish and Italian : texts from the Bible ; quotations froni Erasmus, Virgil, Ovid, Horace, Seneca. Also a number of what are termed "turns of expression," little phrases for use at the beginning oi a sentence ; or for sustaining a dialogue ; typical specimens of repartee, or of rhyming conversation ; odds and ends of all sorts. Bacon undoubtedly used many of these hints for thought and composition in his acknowledged works. It is quite impossible to say how many. The connection between the crude hint and the finished result may be invisible ; the "seeds and weak beginnings" may have been so altered as they passed through the growing ground of Bacon's mind that the developed organism may be unrecognizable. Looking with some detail into this question, I have con- cluded that the following Promus notes may be more or less clearly connected with Bacon's prose writings : — Nos. 3—6 ; 8—10 ; 13 ; 22, g ; 32 ; 41, 3, 4 ; 5i» 2, 4 ; 200 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. 60—63; 70, 2, 4; 81; 83—86, g; 92, 3, s,7\ (^'•^- 35 in what Bacon would call the first Century. Nos. 104—6; 112, 6, 7; 122, 8; 132; 145, 8; 151, 9; 162,6; 178; 184,7; 191; ( = 20). Nos. 222, 5> 6, 7 ; 230, 5, 7 ; 241 ; 250, 9 ; 266, 7, 9 ; 292 (=18). Nos. 302, 3, 8 ; 323, 9 ; 332, 3, 9 ; 341, 4, 7 ; 35o> 2, 3, 5, 7 ; 362, 4, 9 ; 370, 5 ; 380, i, 6 ; 392 ; ( = 32). Nos. 400, 2, 5 ; 412 5, 9 ; 433 : 448 ; 451, 4 ; 4^1, 5» 8 ; 475. 9; 4^7 ; ( = 16). Nos. 506 ; 512, 6 ; 520, 8 ; 530, 2 ; 541, 5, 6, 9 ; 553 ; 561, 3; 570, I, 6, 7; ( = 18). Nos. 601 ; 610, 4, 9 ; 637 ; 641 ; 658 ; 664, 9 ; 676 ; 688 ; 690, 8; ( = 13). Nos. 705, 6, 8 ; 710, 9 ; 724, 7 ; 730, 2, 9 ; 741, 2, 7a; 751 ; 760, 2, 6 ; 780 ; 794, 5, 6, 7a ; ( = 22). Nos. 802, 6 ; 817, g; 832, 6, 8; 850, i, 6 ; 872, 6, 7 ; 880 ; 891, 3, 9; ( = 17)- Nos. 908 ; 910 ; 925 ; 944, 5 ; 965 ; 979 ; 989 ; 992 ; (=9)- Nos. looi, 2 ; 1026 ; 1041 ; 1055 ; 1060, 2, 6 ; 1080 i, 2; (=11). Nos. 1106, 7 ; 1113, 5, 7 ; 1121 ; 1133, 7 ; 1142, 9 ; 1150, I, 2, 4, 5 ; 1167a ; 1169 ; 1171, 2, 5 ; 1180 ; (=21). Nos. 1234— 1362 ; 1365, 7, 9 ; 1395. 6, 7; (=134)- Nos. 1400, 3 ; 1432 ; 1440 — 1460 ; 1472, 4 ; ( = 26). Nos. 1506 ; 1532 ; 1629 i (=23). Total 395. In this enumeration I have included the whole of the entries numbered 1234 — ^3^2, i.e. 128 successive notes, because they are all of about the same quality, and are evidently notes for a larger collection of " Colours of Good and Evil," or for Essays, or discussions in some of the Sections of the Novum Organon or other scientific writings. Although it is not possible to connect many of these notes with anything actually published, yet their intention is clear ; and they have the additional interest of showing BACONIAN GERMS : SHAKESPEAREAN PLANTS. 201 that Bacon contemplated a much larger collection of " Colours " and Essays than he has actually completed. In this department of his literary work, as in most others, his plans and designs far outstripped his actual accomplish- ments. His philosophy is a magnificent torso, and here are some of the fragments of the unfinished parts. Doubtless many more of the notes than those included in the foregoing list were intended for and probably used in his prose writings : such as the terms of expression 272 — 236 ; and 1370 —1383, and a few others. This would add 70 or 80 more to the 395 already pointed out. So that one may make a rough estimate — the onl}^ kind of calcula- tion possible — of 500 as the number of notes that might have been used in such compositions as are usually associ- ated with Bacon's name, i.e., rather less than one third of the entire collection. But it is quite certain that many of these notes not only were never used in Bacon's literary and philosophical writings, but they were not intended to be so used, they never could have been so used, they must have been col- lected for a different purpose, and what that purpose was it would be interesting to find out. It is also clear that a large number of these notes correspond to passages in Shakespeare, and a still larger number may so correspond — as germ to plant — and are exactly such notes as the poet of Shakespeare might have made. Now, if there are any reasons for raising the question of the authorship of Shakespeare, such reasons must certainly become far more pressing when we find that the character of so large a number of Promiis notes forces us to the conclusion that Bacon made a collection such as the author of Shakespeare might have used. It does not of course immediately follow as an irresistible conclusion that the Shakespeare notes are connected with the poems in exactly the same way as other notes are related to the prose. These notes need not be thus explained. But if they arc not so ex- plained they are absolutely unaccountable — they are 202 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. enigmas, puzzles, anomalies which we must be content to accept as inscrutable mysteries. If Bacon wrote Shake- speare the Promus is intelligible— if he did not, it is an insoluble riddle. The Promus, therefore, if it does not prove, makes it antecedently probable, that Bacon was during some part of his life occupied with other literary work than that which is usually attributed to him. He had some use, for instance, for such disjecta membra of uncreated dramatic compositions as the following scraps of dialogue and repartee : — 195. What do you conclude upon that ? 197. Repeat your reason. 198. Hear me out. You never were in. 199. You judge before you understand. I judge as I understand. 200. You go from the matter. But it was to follow you. 201. Come to the point. Why, I shall not find you there. 204. You take more than is granted. You grant less than is proved. 208. Answer directly. You mean as you would direct me. 209. Answer me shortly. Yes : that you may comment upon it. Now I grant that it is not easy to connect these frag- ments of talk with passages from Shakespeare. And yet one may safely affirm that these little dramatic hints are typically Shakespearean. Plenty of specimens of the same kind can be easily produced from the plays. There is much of this kind of repartee in As Yoii, Like It and in Much Ado : ex. gr. : — Colin. — Besides, our hands are hard. ToHchsionc. — Your lips will feel them then the sooner. {As Yoit Like It III. ii.6o). CcUa. — I pray you bear with me. GLIMPSES INTO BACON S PORTFOLIO. 203 Rosaliini.—l had rather bear with you than bear you. (II. iv.9). Orlando. — For ever and a da}'. Rosalind. — Say a day without the ever. (IV. i. 145). Ben. — Fair Beatrice, I thank you for your pains. Beat. — I took no more pains for those thanks than you take pains to thank me (Much Ado II. iii. 258). Some of these notes sound like echoes from the law- courts. But all the same they lend colour to the notion that Bacon was a writer of Dramas. And when we find other passages in which the Shakespearean affinity is quite unmistakable, we cannot dismiss the question of Shake- spearean authorship as an impertinence, or a crank which no sober critic will entertain. For here the question is started, and placed on a distinctly historic and documen- tary basis. In this respect it takes its place side by side with the Northumberland MS., which shews us that the MSS. of two of Shakespeare's Plays, Richard II. and Richard III., were at one time in Bacon's portfolio, and are catalogued among his owm compositions : — the only place in the world which can be thus described. It proves also that Shakespeare's Lucrcce as it might have existed in an early and unfinished draft, was known to Bacon's amanuensis. For the line that is scribbled on this tell- tale title page is ReveaUng day through every crann}^ peeps. But peeps is not the word — it is spies. Peeps would have been a better word for this line, but the exigency of rhyme excluded it, and peeping comes in subsequentl}' in the same stanza (see Liicrece 1086 — lOgo). It seems to me that if any considerable number — say 50 — of the Pronins notes can be clearly connected with passages in Shakespeare, we have some reason for thinking that others may be the unrecognizable germs of other 204 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. passages ; and that small resemblances may have a large significance. We need not clutch at these as arguments too eagerly: but on the other hand we will not refuse them as non-significant because the resemblance between them and Shakespeare is faint. As an illustration I may take the following :— There are several notes referring to lodging and the neighbours it introduces. Such as : 158. I do not only dwell far from neighbours, but near ill neighbours. 1203. Qui a bon voisin a bon matin. Lodged next. 1223. You could not sleep for your ill lodging. 1233. I wish you may so weU sleep as you may not find your ill lodging. And 1479 is a repetition of 1203. Surely that is not a very extravagant comparison which brings these notes into relation with such passages as the following : — Our bad neighbour makes us early stirrers. {Hcniy V. IV. i. 6). The Scot hath been still a giddy neighbour to us. (lb. I. ii. 145, 154). Young son, it argues a distemper'd head So soon to bid good morrow to thy bed. Care keeps his watch in every old man's eye, And where care lodges sleep will never lie. (Romeo and y-'iilict II. iii. 33). If these passages are related as seed to fruit it is very interesting to see how the poet worked ; and when we come across a group of nearly 50 consecutive notes, nearly every one of which calls up some passage in one play — as in the notes from 1189 to 1233, the interest is not lost, it is really increased if the resemblance is faint and indistinct. So that a critic who fixes on one detached note and ridi- cules its application to some passage because the re- semblance is not very exact or striking, misses the significance of the collection, and is not merely hyper- critical, but dense. He might as reasonably deny the relation of a callow nestling to the parent bird, because it has few and fioculent feathers and feeble wings. HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT MEMORANDA. 205 The following may be taken as specimens in which the resemblance between seedling and plant is quite clear : — A'os. 53 & 998. Conscieiitia millc testes. My conscience hath a thousand several tongues. {Richard III. V. iii. 193). Every man's conscience is a thousand swords : to fight &c. {lb. V. ii. 17). No. 106. A fool's bolt is soon shot. You are better at proverbs, by how much, A fool's bolt is soon shot. {Henry V. III. vii. 131). Duke. — By my faith he is very swift and sententious : — ■ Touchstone. — According to the fool's bolt, sir. (As You Like It V. iv. 65). 'Twas but a bolt of nothing, shot at nothing, Which the brain makes of fumes. {CymbeUne IV. ii. 300). In these passages we see how the suggestion of the proverb expands itself into moral and philosophical sentiments. No. 493, — God sendeth foitune to fools. " Good morrow, fool," quoth I : " Xo, sir," quoth he ; " Call me not fool till heaven hath sent me fortune." {As You Like It II. vii. 18) No. 639. — The cat -d'ould eat fish, but she icill not icet her foot. Letting / dare not wait upon / would, Like the poor cat i' the adage. {Mac. I. vii. 44). No. 648. — For the nwonsliine in the icater. O, vain petitioner ! beg a greater matter ; Thou now request'st but moonshine in the water. {Love's L. L. V. it. 207). Never gazed the moon Upon the water, as he'll stand and read As 'twere my daughter's eyes. (117/7. Talc IV. iv. 172J. (Her eyes) which througli the crystal tears give light, Shone like the moon in water seen by night. {Vcn. /i.491). 206 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. No. 806 — Adonis Gardens : {Tilings of great pleasure, but soon fading). Thy promises are like Adonis gardens, That one day bloom'd and fruitful were the next. {i Hen.VI.l.\'\.6). He took [all the learnings of his time] As we do air, fast as 'twas ministered. An' in's spring became a harvest. {Cyinb. I. i. 44). Spring come to you at the farthest In the very end of harvest. {Tent. IV. i. 114). Bacon uses the same fancy in the Hermit's Speech in the Conference of Pleasure : — " The gardens of love, wherein he now playeth himself, are fresh to-day and fading to- morrow." ("Life" I. 379). No. 889. — Clavuni Clavo pellcre. Even as one heat another heat expels, Or as one nail by strength drives out another. So the remembrance of my former love Is by a newer object quite forgotten. {T-d'o Gen. of Ver. II. iv. 192). One fire drives out one fire : one nail, one nail ; Rights by rights falter ; strengths by strengths do fail, {Cor. IV. vii. 54). As fire drives out fire, so pity, pity. (J»/. Ca's. II. i. 171). This last quotation, when compared with the others, shows how the hint of the Promus note may be used, while its language is altered. No. 972. — Alivays let losers have their 'ii'ords. Then give me leave, for losers will have leave To ease their stomachs with their bitter tongues. {Tit.A.m.\.22,3). I can give the loser leave to chide. {2 Hen. VI. III. i. 182). No. 1 1 15. — An neseis longas regibiis esse mantis f {Ovid). This figure of speech is to be found two or three times LONG ARMS. 207 in Bacon's prose, and several times in Shakespeare. In the Sanquhar trial Bacon said: — "Then did his Majesty stretch forth his long arms (for kings have long arms when they will extend them), one of them to the sea, where he took hold of Grey, shipped for Sweden ; the other arm to Scotland, and took hold of Carlisle." {" Life " IV. 293). And again in the trial of Somerset for Overbury's murder. " Alas, Overbury had no such long hand as to reach from the other side of the sea to England, to forbid your banns or cross your love." (" Life " V. 332). Bishop Wordsworth quotes a similar Greek proverb : — jxaKpal Tvpdvvwv x^V^?. The Shakespeare passages in which this figure is used are the following : — Is not my arm of length That reacheth from the restful Enghsh Court As far as Calais, to mine Uncle's head ? {Kidi. II. IV. i. 11). Put forth thy hand, reach at the glorious gold \_i.c. the crown]. What, is't too short ? I'll lengthen it with mine, etc. (2 Hen. VI. I. ii. ii). Dogged York, that reaches at the moon. Whose overweening arm I have plucked back. (//'. Ill.i. 158). Great men have reaching hands : oft have I struck Those that I never saw, and struck them dead. {lb. IV. vii. 87). His sword Hath a sliarp edge ; it's long, and 't may be said It reaches far. [Hen. VIII. Li. 109). They have seemed to be together though absent ; shook hands, as over a vast. And embraced, as it were, from the ends of opposed winds. (IF. r.r/.-I.i. 31). Have I in conquest stretched mine arm so far, To be afear'd to tell grey beards the truth ? (:////. Cas. II. ii. 66 j. 208 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. His legs bestrid the ocean ; his reared arm Crested the world. (Anl. ciiul Clco. V. ii. 82). And danger, which I fear'd, is at Antioch, Whose arm is far too short to hit me here. [Pciic. I. ii. 7). I will now give some illustrations of the mode in which the Promus notes may illustrate the growth and develop- ment of ideas, both in the prose and the poetry. I. — The Procus. The 70th Promus note is as follows : — Ttirpe est proco anciUam sollicitare ; est autein virtutis ancilla laus. It is base — [or detestable'] for a suitor to woo, [or solicit, — or give his heart to] his lady's handmaiden : but praise is virtue's handmaiden. This moral aphorism is used two or three times by Bacon. In his letter of advice to Rutland he thus intro- duces it, — " We should both seek and love virtue for itself, and not for praise : for as one said, Turpe est''' &c. (" Life" II. 15). The best illustration of this aphorism is to be found in the opening sentences of Bacon's Apology. He begins by a justification of the apology itself. Addressing the Earl of Devonshire he writes : — " It may please your good Lordship, I cannot be ignorant and ought to be sensible, of the wrong which I sustain in common speech, as if I had been false or unthankful to that noble, but unfortunate Earl, the Earl of Essex. And for satisfying the vulgar sort, I do no so much regard it ; though I love good name, but yet as an handmaid and attendant of honesty and virtue. For I am of his opinion that said pleasantly, — TJiat it was a shame to him that was a suitor to the mistress to make love to the waiting-woman ; — and therefore to love or court common fame otherwise than it followeth upon honest courses, I, for my part, do not find myself fit or disposed." (" Life " III. 141). The parable is plain: his first CONFLICTING MOTIVES. 2O9 allegiance is due to virtue ; to honest courses. Praise, or fame, or good name and fair repute, is sweet, — he would fain have her smiles also ; but praise is a handmaid waiting upon virtue, whose favours and smiles must be given for her mistress's sake, for no other reason. I will not woo praise as a lover, — for its own sake : but I will be thankful for the friendly glances she bestows on her mistress's suitor. The latter motto has not, so far as I know, been traced to any classic source, and it is only known in Bacon's writings. Perhaps he was himself the pleasant writer whom he quotes, just as Macaulay used to make an unknown "judicious poet " the sponsor of his own fancies. It may, perhaps, be traced to some of the immediate followers of Socrates. For Bacon has an Apophthegm (i8g) which seems to bring the aphorism into close re- lationship with Aristippus : " Aristippus said, That those that studied particular sciences and neglected philosophy were like Pentelope's wooers, that made love to the waiting women." (Works VII. 151). Now there can be no doubt that Bacon's Procus and Bacon's Ancilla are both secreted in a passage of Love's Labour's Lost. The Princess of France is invited by the King of Navarre to a deer-hunt in his park, and is posted with bow and arrows on the edge of a coppice where she may most conveniently aim at the deer as they pass. The gentle lady shrinks from the cruelty of the sport, and yet wishes to win credit by shooting skilfull}'. She is per- plexed by these conflicting motives. Mercy tells her not to aim straight, for the deed accomplished by a good shot is an ill deed, So she plays in a sort of logical fence with the situation, and tries to find out how she may save her credit whether she kills or not. If she misses she will get credit for pity ; if she hits she will be praised for skill. She takes the bow from the Forester saying, — But come — the bow : — now mercy goes to kill And shooting well is then accounted ill. 210 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. TIiiis^' will I save my credit in the shoot: Not wounding, — pity, would not let me do it : If wounding, — then it was to show my skill, That more for praise than purpose mean't to kill. And now follows Bacon's aphorism, the outcome of all this sophistication : — And out of question, so it is sometimes. Glory grows guilty of detested crimes, When for fame's sake, for praise, an outward part, We bend to that the working of the heart : — As I, for praise alone, now seek to spill The poor deer's blood, that my heart means no ill. (See the whole passage — L. L. L. IV. i. 9 — 35). I can almost fancy that the next Promus note, No. 71, may have some relation to this passage, for it claims pardon for humanity whatever mistakes it may make — if it shoots badly, yet it has its own independent merit. The note is — Si suuni cinque trihuendnm est, ccrte et venia liunianitati. If every one is entitled to its own, certainly humanity may claim indulgence (The moiio Suum cinque is quoted in Titus An. I. i. 280). That the Latin aphorism, which seems to have been Bacon's private property, is really lying perdu in these lines can scarcely be disputed. Glory : is the Procus, who is hunting after Vain-glory : his name is Gloriosus ; the object of his lawless love is ostentation or vulgar fame. And in Bacon's Antitheta on Vain Glory he appears side by side with the Procus. For the first of the three aphorisms on the Contra side is, — Gloriosi semper factiosi, niendaces, mobiles, nimii — The gloriosi are always factious, liars, inconstant, extreme. Then follows as a second aphorism Thraso Gnathonis prceda ; the thrasonical person is a prey to Gnatho — the boaster is cozened by the parasite; *This formula of Casuistry, — Tlitis will I reason, — is found in tlie Sonnets : — Thus can my love excuse, &c. — Son. 51. Thus I will excuse ye. — Son. 42. PKOCUS SECRETED IN SHAKESPEARE. 211 (alluding to characters in the Eunuchus of Terence). [It is as well to note that the word thrasonical occurs twice in Shakespeare — in Love's Labotir's Lost SLXid As You Like It. It is also used by Bacon in his description of Overbury, poisoned by Lady Somerset : " Overbury was, of an in- solent, Thrasonical disposition." "Life" V. 312]. And the last of the three aphorisms is our new acquaintance the Procus ; the same, therefore, as Gloriosus, The other terms of the Latin aphorism are freely translated in the poetry. Turpe est is represented by "guilty of detested crimes." The /1;jcz7/« is praise, the handmaiden being "an outward part." The crime, anciUam sollicitare, is "bend- ing the working of the heart " to the outward part, — fame, or praise — Laus is the attendant in both cases. The lines themselves are rather scholastic and dry in their tone, and the reason is plain — they represent a fanciful but somewhat subtle philosophical axiom ; when the connection is apprehended the verse at once becomes luminous, and starts into poetical beauty. The lines are Baconian throughout, in expression and thought. Out of .question is a variation of Bacon's constantly recurring, Certainly, or It is certain, which is familiar to all readers of the Essays. This special variation Out of question, or There is no question, or Out of all question, is found in Essays 19, 29, 58 : in Apophthegm 39, and in Syl. Syl. 915. This same Promus note may be traced also in the •couplet to the 84th Sonnet : — You to your beauteous blessing add a curse Being fond on praise, which makes 3'our praises worse. The whole Sonnet refers to the "rich praise" which his subject can inspire in any poet who makes his qualities the theme of his verse. The curious expression fond on praise, cannot be well understood without Bacon's help, and thus mterpreted the couplet gains new interest and its interior meaning is ascertained. Fond on praise is the lawless love •of the Procus who pays too much attention to the Ancilla, 212 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. This is a specimen of the sort of comment on Shake- speare which might be indefinitely increased if the critics were wise enough to bring Bacon's prose to throw light on Shakespeare's poetry. 2, — Hail of Pearl. Prontus Note 872 is Haile of perle. When we find in Shakespeare this singular fancy, we must admit that there is some vital nexus between Shake- speare and the Prouins. Cleopatra is wildly eager to know what news Anthony's messenger has brought, and yet will only listen to favourable reports : — If thou dost say Anthony lives, is well. Or friends with Ciesar, or not captive to him, I'll set thee in a shower of gold, and liail Rich pearls upon thee. (Ant. C/. II. V. 43). The resemblance between pearls and hailstones is used in Bacon's " Device," In the reply of the Squire to the corrupt statesman we find the following : — " But give ear now to the comparison of my master's condition, and acknowledge such a difference as is betwixt the melting hailstone and the solid pearl." (" Life " I. 384.) See the growth of the fancy in three stages : — 1. In Bacon's " Device" the hailstone and the pearl are contrasted ; their outward resemblance gives point to the contrast between the melting, evanescent condition of the one, and the fixed, enduring state of the other. 2. The Promus note seizes on the resemblance and puts aside the contrast, and imagines a shower in which the hailstones are not melting but lasting, — a shower of pearls. 3. The lines from Antony and Cleopatra adopt the idea first expressed in the " Device," and subsequently developed in the Promus, and apply the fancy to the rich gifts showered by a princess upon a messenger who ULYSSES SLY IN SPEECH AND ACT. 213 earns her thanks by bringing good news of her lover. The two earlier points of view are united. The development of this fancy is surely highly interesting. 3. — Ulysses, The Pronms note 463 is Nee fandi fictor Ulysses — Ulysses sly in speech. The words are taken from Virgil's ^neid, IX. 602, and this is an echo of Homer's cTrtKAoTros ixv6(jiv, (Iliad xxii. 281), thievish or wily and cunning in speech. Bacon thus notes that slyness is the mark and characteristic of Ulysses, and registers the fact for literary use. In Bacon's prose works this quality is not referred to, Ulysses is two or three times mentioned as the man ^^ qui vctulam prcBtulit immorialiiati, being a figure of those which prefer custom and habit before all excellency." (See "Adv. ofL." Works 319, and Essay 8, on "Mar- riage.") But of his slyness no mention is made. He is also referred to in the "Wisdom of the Ancients;" defeating the Sirens by stuffing the ears of his crew with wax, while he himself, with unstopped ears, was tied to the mast. (Works VI. 684, 762.) Perhaps this may be taken as an instance of crafty behaviour, though not of cunning speech. But if the note of slyness is absent in the prose it is present in the poetry. In Shakespeare, Ulysses is never casually mentioned without reference to his slyness, and when he appears himself on the stage his counsel is marked by that subtlety or astuteness which the Pronms indicates. In Lucrece his portrait is studied : But the mild glance which sly Ul3^sses lent Shewed deep regard and smiling government Luc. 1399. Smiling often seems to be in Shakespeare a note or expedient of slyness. Hamlet makes an entry in his note book, about the smiling damned villain — "that one may smile, and smile and be a villain." Richard III. can "Smile and murder when he smiles ; " he can "speak fair 214 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. and smile in men's faces," while he is plotting mischief against them. Donaldbain in Macbeth says, "There's daggers in men's smiles ; " and Richard II. speaks of his rival and supplanter Bolingbroke as " Wooing poor craftsmen with the craft of smiles." In these and other passages which might be referred to we can see how in Shakespeare's mind smiling and slyness are associated. Some such idea may have been working in Bacon's mind when he entered into his Promus the note (501), " Better is the last smile than the first laughter." At any rate it suggests that he had to some extent studied the significance of smiles. Of all Shakespeare's characters Richard III. is the most crafty and designing and perfidious. Slyness may well be attributed to him. So it is, but Ulysses is the type to which slyness is referred. I'll play the orator as well as Nestor, Deceive more slyly than Ulysses could. 3 Hen. VI. III. ii. 188. Some of the speeches of Ulysses in Troilus and Crcssida are of surpassing wisdom and depth ; — slyness is too vulgar and grovelling an attribute to be connected with them. Yet even here a subtlety of contrivance is shown, which on a lower level of action might pass for slyness. In order to chastise the pride of Achilles, he wishes that Hector's challenge, which is really levelled at Achilles, should be accepted by some inferior champion, so that the reputation of Achilles may dwindle by the invidious comparison. This, surely, is slyness in cxcdsis — the very apotheosis of the quality : indeed, Ulysses himself compares his counsel to a tradesman's trick, and calls his slyness a "device." 'Tis meet Achilles meet not Hector. Let us, like merchants, show our foulest wares, And think perchance they'll sell ; if not, The lustre of the better, yet to show, Shall show the better. . . . No, make a lottery, USAGE OF THE WORD SLEIGHT. 215 And b\' device let blockish Ajax draw The sort to fight with Hector : among ourselves Give him allowance for the better man, Hit or miss. Our project's life this shape of sense assumes Ajax, emplo3'ed, plucks down Achilles' plumes. {Tro. Crcs. I. iii. 358-386). If such counsel as this were irreverently criticized, it would be called sly : and accordingly, Thersites, the type of irreverence and scorn, speaks of Ulysses as " that dog- fox." {lb. V. iv. 12). To show how the note of slyness attaches to Ulysses by a sort of necessity, we may observe the terms in which he is referred to by Warwick, who has a design on foot to surprise and seize the young King Edward : — Our scouts have found the adventure very easy : That as Ulysses and great Diomede With sleight and manhood stole to Rhesus' tents, And brought from thence the Thracian fatal steeds, So we, etc. (3 Hai. 17. IV. ii. 18). Observe that sleight is connected with Ulysses, and man- hood with Diomede. Sleight, so spelt, evidently means slyness; this is its proper meaning — a one-syllable variation of slyness was wanted, and here it is. The word, so spelt, occurs nowhere else in "Shakespeare." But the same word is used in Macbeth, spelt slight. The meaning, how- ever, requires the diphthong. The witch, Hecate, is speaking, and describes her deceptive arts : — Upon the corner of the moon There hangs a vaporous drop profound : I'll catch it ere it come to ground, And that, distill'd by magic slights, Shall raise such artificial sprites. As by the strength of their illusion Shall draw him on to his confusion. {Macb. III. V. 23). Doubtless this should be spelt sleights. But as Ulysses was 2l6 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. not in evidence, the poet had nothing to keep him on the alert to maintain by accurate spelling the correlation of the word with slyness. This motive secured the proper spelling in 3 Hen. VI. Philologists say that sleigh is the old form of sl3^ Bacon uses the word sleight in the Squire's speech in the Device : — *' Jugglers are no longer in request when their tricks and sleights are once perceived." (" Life " I. 384). It is plain then that Shakespeare's references to Ulysses show that he had probably made a private note in his collection of hints for invention to this effect: " N.B. — Ulysses must always be sly." The Promus gives us the note in question. Marlowe evidently shared the opinion of Bacon and Shakespeare about Ulysses. Thus in Dido : — See how the night, Ulysses-hke, comes forth, And intercepts the day as Dolon Erst. {Dido I . i. 70). Dolon was a spy of the Trojans, slain by Diomede. And again in the same play, Sinon is the tool of Ulysses. Ulysses on the sand, Assayed with honeyed words to turn them back . . . And therewithal! he called false Sinon forth— A man, compact of craft and perjury, Whose 'ticing tongue was made of Hermes' pipe . . . and him Ulysses sent to our unhapp}' town. {lb. II. i. 136-147). 4. — Voluntary Forgetting. Forgetting, not spontaneously or unavoidably, — but artificially and voluntarily, — is referred to in some Promus notes. It is twice repeated. Note 403. ii6S.~Aii of forgLUniii. 114 and 1232. — WcU to forgcl. Artificial forgetfulness is not, I believe, referred to in the prose works : nor is it likely to appear except in FORGETTING ONE S SELF. 217 " Works of Invention," but it is frequent in " Shakespeare." For example : — Unless you could teach me to forget a banished father, you must not learn me how to remember any extraordinary pleasure. (.4s You Like II I. ii. 5). Bcnvolio. — Be ruled by me, forget to think of her. Romeo. — O teach me how I should forget to think , . . He that is strucken blind cannot forget The precious treasure of his eyesight lost . . . Farewell, thou can'st not teach me to forget. {Rom. Jul. I. i. 232). Note 1,232 is among the set evidently collected for use in the composition of Romeo and Juliet, and a lively picture of the art of forgetting is given in one passage. Juliet. — I have forgot why I did call thee back. Romeo. — Let me stand here till thou remember it. Juliet. — I shall forget, to have thee still stand there, Remembering how I love thy company. Romeo. — And I'll still stay to have thee still forget, Forgetting any other home but this. [lb. II. ii. 171). The same conceit is found elsewhere. I will forget that Julia is alive. Remembering that my love to her is dead. (Two Gent. Vcr. II. vi. 27). Shall I forget myself to be mj-self ? Ay, if yourself's remembrance wrong yourself. {Rich. III. IV. iv. 420). And in Marlowe we find, in a very Shakespearean passage: Come death, and with thy fingers close my ej'cs, Or if I live, let me forget myself. {Edisi'ard II. V. i. no). The same sentiment, but more disguised, is in the follow- ing:— I am not mad: I would to heaven I were, 2r8 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. For tlieu 'tis like I should forget myself. O if I could, what grief should I forget ! Preach some philosophy to make me mad, And thou shalt be canonized. Cardinal. Cjolin III. iv. 48). It is clear that voluntary oblivion is equally familiar to the note-maker who compiled the Proinus, and to Shakespeare. 5. — Like One's Self. The maxim that every one should study consistency in his acts and words is one that might be as commonplace with any writer. But when this maxim is invariably expressed as the duty of being like one's self, the sentiment ceases to be commonplace — it is a mark of individualit}'. The Promus gives us (1,142) the motto on which this canon of behaviour is based : Nil nialo quain illos similes esse sni et me niei. I wish for nothing more than that they should be like themselves, while I am like myself. This was Bacon's motto from his earliest life. In the well-known letter to Lady Burghley, dated Sept. 16, 1580, he excuses himself for deficient familiarity with the " cere- monies of Court," and adds, " My thankful and service- able mind shall be always like itself, however it vary from the common disguising " (" Life," I. 12). In the year 1589 the same is repeated. In church controversies it is to be re- membered that " a fool was to be answered, but not by be- coming like him," — "these things will not excuse the imitation of evil in another. It should be contrariwise with us, as Caesar said, Nil Malo," &c. (lb. jj). In dealing with the Parliament, Bacon repeatedly urges the King not to "descend to any means, or degree of means, which " carrieth not a symmetry with 3'our majesty and greatness." "I am still of opinion that above all things your Majesty should not descend below yourself." ("Life,"IV. 313, 369). In the charge against Owen, Bacon enumerates various offences which might have provoked the King — " he hath _, ) REMEMBERING ONE S SELF. 2I9 been irritated. . . . And yet I see his Majesty keepeth Caesar's rule — Nil Malo, &c. ; he leaveth them to be like themselves, and he remaineth like himself, and striveth to overcome evil with goodness." (Life," 155, 162). To show how the same sentiment, similarly expressed, is familiar to Shakespeare, the following passages will suffice, without further comment :— now you look like Hubert ! all this while You were disguised. {John IV. i. 126). The King is not himself, but basely led By flatterers. {Rich. II. II. i. 241). See, see, King Richard doth himself appear . . . Yet looks he like a King. {lb. III. iii. 62, 68). 1 shall hereafter, my thrice gracious Lord, Be more myself. (i Hen. IV. III. ii. 92). Then should the warlike Harry, like himself, Assume the port of Mars. {Hen. v. I., Prol. 5). Whate'er it be, be thou still like thyself. (3 Hen. VI. III. iii. 15). A}^ now my sovereign speaketh like himself. {Ih. IV. vii. 67). But he fell to himself again, and sweetly In all the rest show'd a most noble patience. {Hen. VIII. II. i. 35). I do profess You speak not like yourself. {lb. II. iv. 84). While I remain above the ground, you shall Hear from me still, and never of me aught But what is like me formerly. {Coriol. IV. i. 51). Always I am Ciesar. {Jul. Cccsar I. ii. 212). 220 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. I'll seem the fool I am not: Antony- Will be himself. {Aiif. CI. I. i. 42). Sir, sometimes when he is not Antony He comes too short of that ^^reat property Wliich still should go with Antony. {lb. I. i. 56). I shall entreat him To answer like himself. {lb. II. ii. 3). Had our general Been what he knew himself, it had gone well. (lb. III. X. 26). To thine own self be true. {Hcwi. I. iii. 78). Make me but like my thoughts. {All's Well III. iii. ro). These specimens of the hints for Shakespearean comment to be derived from the Promus may suffice. The full significance of this singular note-book has not been yet brought to light; it contains ample material for students of Shakespeare and Bacon yet to work upon. There are man}' turns of expression which seem so commonplace that it is difficult to understand why they were inserted. And yet even in these we may sometimess hit upon phrases extremely characteristic of the philosopher and the poet. For instance, the Note 292 — Few words needed — seems a very useless memorandum. But it represents a mode of speech singularly frequent in Bacon and Shakespeare. Bacon, in one of his speeches addressed to the King, begins his closing paragraph with, " It remaineth only that I use a few words, the rather to move your Majesty in this cause: a few words I say — a very few." ("Life," III. 186). In another speech, promising brevity, he says: " I will apply some admonitions, not vulgar or discursive, but apt for the times, and in few words, for they are best remem- bered." ("Life," VI. 203). In Shakespeare we have, TURNS OF EXPRESSION. 221 " Few words suffice" {Taiii. Shrew I. ii. 66). " In a few " occurs more than once (extract from Tavt. Sh. I, ii. 52). " In a few words, but spacious in effect " {Timon III. v. 97. Paiica verba — Mcr. Wives I. i. and Love's Labour's Lost IV. ii.). Pauca, simply, — Merry Wives, Henry V .^Paucas pallabrias. Tarn. Sh. and Henry V. Fewness and truth. Measure for Measiire I. v. 39. See also 3 Parnassus 1567. I find that strange (302) is frequent in both groups of writings. It is not current speech. Of these turns of expression none is more curious than What Else ? Nos. 307 and 1,400. For on looking into the use of this little phrase in Shakespeare we always find it means what a lively up-to-date youth would express by Why certainly 1 or, Of course. An example or two will make this clear. Tranio. — Sir, this is the house, please it 3'ou that I call ? Pedant. — Ay, what else ? {Tain. Sli. IV. iv. i). Men. — Shall's to the Capitol ? Com. — O, ay, what else ? {Cor. IV. vi. 147). BoUngbrokc. — Will her ladyship behold and hear our exorcisms ? Hume. — Ay ; what else ? (2 Hen. VI. I. iv, 5). Wardi'ick. — And, Clarence, now then it is more than needful. Forthwith that Edward be pronounced a traitor, &c. C/a/-.— What else ? (3 Hen. VI. IV. vi. 56). In one case it is expanded into What shall we do else ? Twelfth Night I. iii. 146. And there are other illustrations. What else? occurs in Marlowe's Edward H. the most Shakespearean of the Marlowe plays, IV. vi. 117 ; V. iv. 23 ; V. 25, 32, and always with the same meaning. The Proinus may not prove that Bacon wrote Shake- speare, but it assuredly proves that he had literary designs to which none of his acknowledged writings correspond : 222 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. and it proves that there is no j^ood reason why we should not search in EHzabethan dramatic Hterature for an explanation of these designs ; it proves that the Shake- spearean drama has as good a claim as any other to be included in this quest ; and if no other work of invention can put in a superior or equal claim, it distinctly opens the question — Does not the Promus supply some positive indications that Shakespeare is the key that unlocks this enigma? Henceforth our quest is justified by documentary evidence, and to dismiss it with contempt or by trans- parently inconclusive or evasive arguments is both impertineiiL and irrational, in either the classical or vernacular sense of the word, im.pertinent. 223 CHAPTER XII. ECHOES AND CORRESPONDENCIES. Baconian echoes in Shakespeare are so abundant, that the absence of any reference to them in the notes of annotated plays is very remarkable. Shakespeare editors are, of course, strongly opposed to the Baconian theory ; but that is no reason for ignoring Bacon, and even from the Shake- spearean point of view these comparisons are very interesting and instructive ; in many cases they suppl}^ valuable interpretation. The introduction of these notes would doubtless lend some support to our argument, — but surely that is no good reason for neglecting them. The abundance of them may be indicated by the crudest statistics of one collection. The first volume of Mr. Donnelly's "Great Cryptogram," — in which the cryptogram is not discussed, that being left to the second, — is the most masterly and convincing statement of the Baconian case ever published. It is a large royal octavo book of 502 pages ; and, of these, 208 pages are devoted to Parallelisms. There are nine chapters dealing with — i. Identical Expressions. 2. Identical Metaphors. 3. Identical Opinions. 4. Identical Quotations. 5. Identical Studies. 6. Identical Errors. 7. Identical use of unusual words. 8. Identities of Character, and g. Identities of Style. To my mird the probative force of this enormous collection is irresistible. The only wa}' of evading it is to deny the argument derived from parallels altogether. But this would be to inflict fatal damage on a large amount of Shakespearean and other criticism which rests on the same basis. For instance, Mr. Charles Knight uses exactly this 224 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. kind of reasoning to prove that the play of i Henry VI. was written by Shakespeare, and not by Marlowe or any other writer. Nothing can be more convincing than this elaborate argument. Those who are satisfied by it may be challenged to define the difference between his argument and ours. The usual plan is to break up the argument into fragments, select one or two weak or doubtful cases, — and smuggle in the assumption that the whole case rests upon these, and is defeated by their over- throw. Nothing can be more grossly unfair. The evidence derived from parallels is cun:iulative, and in such an argument even the strongest instance may be spared, and yet the weakest may possess some value as one of the gossamer threads which contribute to the construction of a cable strong enough to resist the most violent efforts to break it. The argument is not like a chain which is only as strong as the weakest link : it is like a faggot, the mass of which cannot be broken, though every single stick may be brittle ; or like a rope, made by the accumulation of a great number of slender fibres, which by themselves may be easily torn, but in their combination can resist the greatest force. I do not think the Calculus has yet been invented that will enable us to cast the sum of an indefinite series of small arguments. But it must be included in that branch of Inductive Logic which deals with circumstantial evidence, — and it is well known how the detective import of such evidence may be constituted by a collection of facts each of which singly would prove nothing, — yet each of which lends some atom of force to the entire mass — and the resultant conclusion may be as well sustained as if it rested on direct documentary evidence : and perhaps even better. For documents may be forged or fictitious, and can generally be disputed, — this kind of circumstantial evidence consists of incontrovertible and indestructible facts. In the collection of parallels which I have to offer I wish to present only such as appear to me strong — such as in other cases are usually accepted as marks of DANGEROUS SUCCESS. 225 individuality in style or thought. It is however to be remembered that any estimate of strength in such a case is a matter of individual impression, and I must therefore claim that those who criticize separate extracts should not neglect the value belonging to the entire collection, — in- cluding not only those now presented, but those already published by other advocates of the Baconian theory. Moreover, I have endeavoured to bring forward a consider- able number of parallels which rest on a deeper basis than verbal coincidence, and relate to the fixed and character- istic ideas of the two groups of writings. Most of those here given have not been previously published ; or only in an incomplete way. Some however have appeared, and I wish to make special acknowledgment to Mr. Donnelly for the collection already alluded to ; and to Mrs, Pott for the cases included in her annotations to the Promiis. I have also reproduced some parallels which have been before published in the Bacon Journal and Bacentana. Others may have also appeared elsewhere, for in such a quest as this the same discovery may be made over and over again. I. In one of Bacon's letters to Essex, written in 1599, he makes a very striking remark on the danger attending too much success in public service : — " Your lordship is designed to a service of great merit and great peril ; and as the greatness of the peril must needs include a like proportion of merit, so the greatness of merit may include no small consequence of peril, if it be not temperately governed. For all immoderate success extinguish eth merit, and stirreth up distaste and envy, — the assured forerunners of whole charges of peril." ("Life" II. 129). The same idea is most eloquently expressed more than once in Shakespeare. Ventidius, a lieutenant of Antony's, coming back in triumph after a victory, speaks : — O Silius, Silius, I have done enough : a lower place, note well, May make too great an act ; for learn this, Silius, Q 226 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Better to leave undone, than by our deed Acquire too high a fame, when him we serve's away. Caesar and Antony have ever won More in their oiftcer than person : Sossius, One of my place in Syria, his lieutenant, For quick accumulation of renown, Which he achieved by the minute, lost his favour. Who does i' the wars more than his captain can, Becomes his captain's captain : and ambition. The soldier's virtue, rather makes choice of loss Than gain which darkens him. I could do more to do Antonius good, But 'twould offend him, and in his offence, Sliould my performance perish. {Ant. CI. III. i. II). The same rule of action is recognised by Coriolanus, whose " insolence can brook to be commanded under Cominius." The explanation is, — Fame, at wliicli he aims. In whom already he's well graced, cannot Better be held, nor more attain'd, than by A place below the first ; for what miscarries Shall be the general's fault, though he perform To the utmost of a man, and giddy censure Will then cry out of Marcius, " O, if he Had borne the business !" {Cor. I. i. 267). Lewis Theobald very aptly quotes the following from Quintus Curtius, as a possible derivation of this idea. It refers to the relations between Antipater and Alexander the Great. "Et quanquam Fortuna rerum placebat, invidiam tamen, quia majores res erunt, quam quas Prsefecti modus caperet, metuebat. Quippe Alexander hostes vinci voluerat : Antipatrum vicisse ne tacitus quidem indignabatur, su£e demptum glorise existimans, quicquid cessisset alienas. Itaque Antipater, qui prope nosset spiritus ejus, non est ausus ipse agere arbitria victorias." ("Quintis Curtis" I. i.). It is not unlikely SMALL FAULTS IN GREAT PERSONS. 227 that the poet had this passage in his mind when he was writing the drama of Antony and Cleopatra. 2. The equivalent to the motto noblesse oblige appears in Bacon's Dc Augmcntis as a commentary on the text in Proverbs: — "As dead flies do cause the best ointment to stink, so does a little folly him that is in reputation for wisdom and honour." This is the homily derived from the proverb : — "It is a very hard and unhappy condition (as the proverb well remarks) of men pre-eminent for virtue, that their errors, be they never so trifling, are never excused. But, as in the clearest diamond, every little cloud or speck catches and displeases the eye, which in a less perfect stone would hardly be discerned, so in men of remarkable virtue the slighest faults are seen, talked of, and severely censured, which in ordinary men would either be entirely unobserved, or readily excused. Hence a little folly in a very wise man, a very small offence in a very good man, a slight impropriety in a man of polite and elegant manners, detracts greatly from their character and reputation ; and therefore, it would be no bad policy for eminent men to mingle some harmless absurdities with their actions, so that they may retain some liberty for themselves, and make small defects less distinguishable." (Works V. 42). Obviously, Bacon's own reputation has suffered from this cause. The same subtle observation with meta- phorical embellishments is repeated in reference to govern- ment. It occurs in a speech addressed to the Judges, 1617 : — " The best governments be always like the fairest crystals, wherein every little icicle or grain is seen, which in a fouler stone is never perceived." (" Life " VI. 213). And again, " The best governments, yea, and the best men, are like the most precious stones, wherein every flaw, or icicle or grain are seen and noted more than in those that are generally foul and corrupted." (Reply to Speaker, J620. "Life" VII. 17S). 228 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. The sentiment of these passages is somewhat allied to that hinted at in the Promus Note (89) : A stone without foyle. Mrs. Pott's comments on this and cognate notes^ and the Shakespearean passages cited in illustration, are among the most valuable of her illustrations of the Promus, It is important to remark how these singularly subtle and, as thus expounded, original sentiments, are repro- duced in Shakespeare. The impetuosity of the brave and generous hearted Hotspur draws the following rebuke from Mortimer : — You must needs learn, lord, to amend this fault : Though sometimes it show greatness, courage, blood, — And that's the dearest grace it renders vou, — Yet oftentimes it doth present harsli rage, Defect of manners, want of government, Pride, haughtiness, opinion and disdain. The least of which haunting a nobleman Loseth men's hearts, and leaves behind a stain Upon the beauty of all parts besides. Beguiling them of commendation. (i Hen. IV. III. i. 180). Still more accurately is Bacon's homily reflected in Hamlet : — So oft it chances in particular men, That for some vicious mole of nature in them. As, in their birth, — wherein they are not guilty, Since Nature cannot choose his origin, — By the o'ergrowth of some complexion Oft breaking down the pales and forts of reason ; Or bv some habit that too much o'erleavens The form of plausive manners ; that these men. Carrying, I say, the stamp of one defect, Seeing Nature's livery, or fortune's star. Their virtues else, — be they as pure as grace. As infinite as man may undergo, — Shall in the general censure take corruption From that particular fault ; this dram (? grain) of evil Doth all the noble substance often dout. To his own scandal. {Ham. I. iv. 17). THE MAGNANIMOUS LION. 229 This passage is connected in a very interesting style, with another passage in the "Advancement," by Colonel Moore. See "Bacon Journal" I. 177. 3. In one of the Meditationes Sacrce, — on Charity, — Bacon refers to the different degrees of charity : " The first is to forgive our enemies when they repent : and of this there is found even among the more generous kind of wild beasts some shadow or image : for lions are said to be no longer savage towards those who yield and prostrate themselves." (Works VII. 245). In Bacon's speech at the trial of Lord Sanquahar for a very revengeful murder, the relenting lion is brought forward. " Generous and magnanimous spirits are readiest to forgive, and it is a weakness and im.potency of mind to be unable to forgive. Corpora magnanimo satis est prostrasse leonem." (" Life" IV. 291). The Latin line is from Ovid's "Tristia" III. v. 33. Shakespeare's pictures of this type of charity are absolutely the same : — Thus dost thou hear the Nenicean Hon roar 'Gainst thee, thou lamb, that standest as his prey. Submissive fall his princely feet before, And he from forage will incline to play. But if thou strive, poor soul, what art thou then ? Food for his rage, repasture for his den. (L. L. L. IV. i. 90). Troiliis. — Brother, you have a vice of mercy in you Which better lits a lion than a man. Hector.— What vice is that, good Troilus ? Chide me for it. Troihis. — When many times the captive Grecian falls Even in the fan and wind of your fair sword, You bid them rise and live. {Tro. Cr. V. iii. 37). Henry VI. thinks his gentle treatment of his foes — his pity, mildness, mercy, forgiveness, — will make them relent : — These graces challenge grace, And when the lion fawns upon the lamb. 230 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. The lamb will never cease to follow hiiii. (3 Hen. 17. IV. viii. 48— 50). No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity? {Rich. in. I. ii. 71). Her life was beast-like and devoid of pity. (77/. A. V. iii. 199). As the grim lion fawneth o'er his prey. [Litcrccc, 421). 4. One of Bacon's charges against Aristotle is that " after the Ottoman fashion, he thought he could not reign in safety unless he put all his brethren to death." {De Aug. III. iv). " The philosophy of Aristotle, after having by hostile confutations destroyed all the rest (as the Ottomans serve their brothers) has laid down the law on all points." [Nov. Org. I. 67). He speaks of the "battles and contests " (pugnas et dimicationes) of Aristotle, who, after the Ottoman fashion felt insecure in his own Kingdom of Philosophy till he had slain his brethren." (Works V. 463). Bacon nowhere, I believe, names the Ottoman ruler Amurath, who thus inaugurated his reign by fratricide. But Shakespeare, when he makes the same allusion gives the name. When Henry V. ascended the throne, seeing alarm pictured on the face of his nobles and brothers, he says,— Brothers, you mix your sadness with some fear ; This is the English, not the Turkisli Court ; Not Amurath an Amurath succeeds, But Harry, Harry. (2 Hen. IV. V. ii. 46). Bacon's reference to the pugnas et dimicationes of Aristotle is probably reflected in the words : — Let's be no stoics nor no stocks, I pray ; Or so devout to Aristotle's checks As Ovid be an outcast quite abjured. (Tain. S. I. i. 31J. > There is a class of men whom Bacon calls " troublers ENAMELLED DANGER. 23I of the world." "That gigantic state of mind which possesseth the troublers of the world, . . . who would have all men happy or unhappy as they were their friends or enemies and would give form to the world according to their own humours." {De Atcg. VII. 2 ; Works V. 12). " The French King troubles the Christian world." {Hen. VII. Works VI. 118). AlsoS:v/. Syl. 1000. The same phrase, with much the same technical mean- ing is found in Shakespeare. Queen Margaret in her in- vective against Richard III. calls him, "The troublerof the poor world's peace." {Rich. III. I. iii. 221). Mariana, finding her self-revealing is so affecting Pericles as to make his comfort but the reflection of her story — making him happ,- or not, according to her humours, says : — But not to be a troubler of your peace, I will end here. {Pericles V. i. 153). 6. In a very early State paper of Bacon's, dating about the end of the year 1584, and which was not published in any form till 1651, quite a cluster of Shakespearean phrases is to be found. It is a paper of advice to the Queen, with reference to her treatment of the Papists. Bacon advises that they should be discouraged and enfeebled rather than actively persecuted. "To suffer them to be strong in the hope that they will be contented with reasonable con- cessions, carries with it but the fair enamelling of a terrible danger." To leave them half content, half discontent, worried and irritated by petty annoyances, "carries with it an equally deceitful shadow of reason ; for no man loves one the better for giving him a bastinado with a Httle cudgell." The "fair enamel" covering danger, means more than Bacon himself in these words expressed. The latent metaphor is disclosed in two or three passages of Shakespeare. Bacon had in his mind the metallic lustre of a deadly snake — he might have worked up into his State paper the following lines : — And there tlie snake tlirows her enamell'd skin, 232 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Weed wide enough to wrap a fairy in. 01/. iV. D. II. i. 255). As the snake, roU'd in a flowering bank, With shining checker'd slough doth sting a child, That for the beauty thinks it excellent. (2 Hen. VI. III. i. 228). I fear me you but warm the starved snake Who, cherished in your breasts, will sting your hearts. {lb- 343). The bastinado with a cudgell brings to mind the energetic language of Philip, the Bastard, in John; re- ferring to the citizen who speaks for Angiers : — He gives the bastinado with his tongue, Our ears are cudgelled : not a word of his But buffets better than a fist of France. (Jo//;/ II. i. 463). From the passage in Bacon's prose we find that as early as the year 1584 he had become accustomed to think of hard words as comparable to hard blows — that the bastinado may be wielded by the tongue as well as by the hand. This same idea kept lasting hold on his mind, and re- appears in many well-known Shakespearean passages. Thus : — Brutus. — Words before blows : is it so, countrymen ? Octaviits. — Not that we love words better, as you do. Brutus. — Good words are better tlian bad strokes, Octavius. Antony. — In your bad strokes, Brutus, you give good words. Witness the hole you made in Caesar's heart, Crying, " Long live ! liail Cnssar ! " Cassius. — Antony, The posture of your blows are yet unknown. {Jul. Ccvs. V. i. 27). Forbear sharp speeches to her : she's a lady So tender of rebukes, that words are strokes. And strokes deatli to her. {Cyinb. III. v. 39). 7. Among other "deficients" in science which Bacon noted, when, in the De Atignientis, he was making a map of SPITTING OUT THE TONGUE. 233 the territories already discovered, and pointing out those yet to be cleared, he suggested that a collection should be made of " what schoolmen term the ultimities, and Pindar the tops or summits of human nature ; " specimens, that is, of highest attainment in the several departments of human culture, action, or endurance. The following is a specimen of the sort of instances which he had in mind : — "Wha*. a proof of patience is displayed in the story told of Anaxarchus, who, when questioned under torture, bit out his own tongue (the only hope of information), and spat it in the face of the tyrant." (Works IV. 374). The story is derived from Diogenes Laertius : Bacon's version is taken from Pliny or Valerius Maximus. Shakespeare takes the same action, which Bacon gives as a top instance of patience, as a supreme specimen of heroic and courageous defiance. Bolingbroke being invited by the king to reconcile himself to Mowbray, and throw away the gage of battle which he had picked up, replies, — O God, defend my soul from such deep sin ! Shall I seem crest-fall'n in my father's sight ? Or with pale beggar-fear impeach ni}- height Before this out-dared dastard ? Ere my tongue Shall wound my honour with such feeble wrong, Or sound so base a parle, my teeth shall tear The slavish motive of recanting fear, And spit it bleeding in his high disgrace. Where shame doth harbour, even in Mowbray's face. {Rich. II. I. i. 187). It is not very likely that William Shakspere had read any of the classic authors from which this story might be derived. We cannot suppose that Pliny, Valerius Maximus, or Diogenes Laertius were school books at Stratford-on- Avon. If Bolingbroke's defiance had taken the form : — I'll bite my tongue out, ere I use it thus, it might have been regarded as n casual coincidence. But 234 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. when he also threatens to spit it in the face of his enemy, we cannot explain it by a clause in the chapter of accidents. We find also that Shakespeare uses the word top in the same technical sense as Bacon — to express the ne plus ultra of achievement or quality. The following are instances: — Admired Miranda ! Indeed the top of admiration ! worth What's dearest to the world. {Temp. III. i. 37). Salisburj^ seeing the dead body of Prince Arthur, sup- posed to be murdered, exclaims: — This is tlie very top The height, the crest, or crest unto the crest Of murder's arms. {John IV. iii. 45). and other superlative phrases are added, How would you be, If He, which is tlie top of judgment, should But judge you as you are ? {Mens, for Mcas. II. ii. 75). And wilt thou still be hammering treachery To tumble down thy husband and thyself From top of honour to disgrace's feet ? (2 Hen. F/. I.ii.47). Not in the legions Of horrid hell can come a devil more damn'd In evils to top Macbeth. {Macb. IV. iii. 55). The merits of Coriolanus rest on actions, — Which, to the spire and top of praises vouch'd Would seeni but modest. {Cor. I. ix. 24). 8. The fable of the basilisk is occasionally to be met with in other Elizabethan poets besides Shakespeare. But the resemblance between Bacon's method of applying it and Shakespeare's is so striking that it is deserving of accurate record. The cocatrice is another name for the same BASILISK OR COCATRICE. 235 fabulous creature. Bacon uses it to enforce his character- istic maxim, that good men ought to understand evil as well as good, and sound all the depths of Satan. "For, as the fable goeth of the basilisk, that if he see you first you die for it ; but if you see him first, he dieth ; so it is with deceits and evil arts, which if they be first espied, they leese their life ; but if they prevent, they endanger. {Adv. L. II. xxi. g). The same legend is very skilfully applied to Perkin Warbeck : "This was the end of this little cocatrice of a King, that was able to destroy those that did not espy him first. ("Hist, of Hen. VII." Works VI. 203). The same fable is also alluded to in the Syl. Syl. 924. The metaphorical use of the fable is frequent in Shakespeare. We are now glad to behold 3'our e3'es : — Your e3'es, which hitherto have borne in them Against the French, that met them in their bent, The fatal balls of murdering basilisks. The venom of such looks, we fairly hope, Have lost their quality. {Hen. V. V. ii. 14"). The mood of one who could not pass by a jest, — a characteristic, according to Ben Jonson, of Bacon, — is seen in the multitudinous punning of these lines. For a certain kind of cannon was called a basilisk, — and the "fatal balls" may mean either cannon balls or eyeballs, according to the double entendre of the word Basilisk. Look not upon me, for thine eyes are wounding ; Yet do not go away : come, basilisk. And kill the innocent gazer with thy sight. {2 Hen. VI. III. ii. 51). Observe the gazer is innocent, that is, he does not espy in any protective way. I'll slay more gazers than the basilisk. (3 Hen. VI. III. ii. 187). Thine eyes, sweet lady, have infected mine. 236 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. [Reply.] Would they were basilisks to strike thee dead ! {Rkii. in. I. ii. 150). Here Bacon's theory of the power to fascinate by glances of the eye, referred to in a former discussion (chap, x., § 14), is also referred to. O my accursed womb, the bed of death ! A cocatrice hast thou hatch'd to the world, Whose unavoided eye is murderous. (76. IV. i. 54). This will so fright them both, that they will kill one another by the look, like cocatrices. — Tivdftli Niglil III. iv. 213. It is a basilisk unto mine eye, Kills me to look on't. (Cymb. II. iv. 107). Make me not sighted like the basilisk ; I have look'd on thousands, who have sped the better By my regard, but kill'd none so. {Winter's Talc I. ii. 388). Hath Romeo slain himself? Say thou but Aye, And that bare vowel / shall poison more Than the death darting Eye of Cocatrice. (Rom. Jul. III. ii. 45). Again the irresponsible punster is manifest. Again we observe that Bacon never could pass by a joke. Here with a cocatric' dead-killing eye He rouseth up himself. {Litcrccc 540). [Also, see 2 Hen. VI. III. ii. 321-4]. g. Bacon in several places expresses his opinion that the stars are true fires : "The fire of the stars is pure, perfect and native. ... In heaven fire exists in its true place, removed from the assault of any contrary body, constant, sustained by itself and things hke itself . . . fiame with us is pyramidal, and in the heaven, globular." (Works V. 538. 476, 533, 550). "The celestial bodies, most of them, are true fires or flames, as the Stoics held ; more fine, perhaps, and rareified than our flame is." {Syl. Syl. 31). THE STARS ARE FIRES. 237 The same opinion concerning stars is not infrequent in Shakespeare. Coriolanus threatens his pusillanimous countrymen, — By the fires of heaven, TU leave the foe, And make 1113' wars on you. [Cor. I. iv. 39). When Macbeth is contemplating murder, he exclaims : — Stars ! hide your fires. — Mach. I. iv. 50. Julius Caesar claims kindred with the stars : — The skies are painted with unnumber'd sparks, They are all fire, and every one doth shine. {■fill. Cd's. III. i. 63). Hamlet makes the same allusion : — Doubt thou the stars are fire. — Ham. II. ii. 116. This most e.xcellent canopy, the air, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical rooffretted with golden fire. — 7^. 311. Gloucester, seeing Lear in the storm, exclaims : — The sea, with such a storm as his bare head. In hell-black night endured, woul'd have buoy'd up And quench'd the stelled fires. (Lear III. vii. 58). And Antony, bewailing his defeat moans : — My good stars, that were my former guides Have empty left their orbs, and shot their fires Into the abysm of hell. (Ant. Cko. III. xi. 145). 10. Bacon's references to quicksilver are very curious. Among the motions, or active virtues of bodies, is — '* Motion of Flight " by which bodies " from antipathy flee from and put to flight hostile bodies, and separate them- selves from them, or refuse to mingle with them. . . . Quicksilver is kept from uniting into an entire mass by lard, &c., owing to their desire to fly from these inter- vening bodies. . . . Motion of Flight is conspicuous 238 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. in gunpowder, quicksilver, and gold." {Nov. Org. II. 48). " Quicksilver contains a flatulent and expansive spirit." (Works V. ig6). The power of motion is seen in quick- silver, "the force whereof, if it be vexed by fire, and prevented from escaping, is not much less than that of gunpowder." {lb. 437). Now it is very remarkable that Bacon's curious scientific notions about quicksilver are clearly reflected in the only two passages in Shakespeare where it is referred to. In 2 Hen. IV. it is used to illustrate a motion of flight : — " A rascal, bragging slave ! the rogue fled from me like quick- silver." (2 Hen IV. II. iv. 247). In Hamlet it refers to a motion of antipathy producing an effect like the " mortification " of quicksilver. The ghost is describing the mode in which he was murdered by the juice of cursed hebenon : — Whose effect Holds such an enmity with blood of man, That swift as quicksilver it courses through The natural gates and alleys of the body, And with a sudden vigour it doth posset And curd, like eager droppings into milk, The thin and wholesome blood. {Ham. I. V. 64). Bacon also uses the same metaphor to describe the flight of Perkin Warbeck. "It was not long but Perkin, who was made of quicksilver, which is hard to imprison, began to stir. For, deceiving his keepers, he took to his heels and made speed to the sea coast." ("Henry VII." Works VI. 20). Here is a Motion of Flight. II. Bacon seems to have studied the effect of poisons, as part of his medical and physiological observations. One of his most characteristic observations is that poisons often cause swelling, and in this respect they resemble certain conditions of the mind which also cause swelling, either physical or psychical. As to poison : — " It is accounted an evident sign of SWELLING AND VENOM. 239 poison (especially of that kind which operates by malig- nancy, not by corrosion), if the face or body be swollen." (Works V. 358). As to anger and pride: — "A sudden burst of anger in some inflates the cheeks : as likewise does pride." " Turke}' cocks swell greatly when angry." {lb. 358-g). Bacon speaks of "the swelling pride and usurpa- tion of the See of Rome." ("Life" V. 5). He advises Cecil a course to secure " honour ard merit of her Majesty without ventosity {i.e. the swelling of pride or ambition) or popularity." (" Life" IIL 45). And as to knowledge, he remarks that "it is not the proportion or quantity of knowledge, how large soever, that can make the mind of man to swell ; but it is merely the quality of knowledge which, be it in quantity more or less, if it be taken without the true corrective thereof, hath in it some nature of venom or malignity, and some effects of that venom, which is ventosity or swelling. {Adv. L. I. i. 3). All this is repeatedly reflected in Shakespeare. Ex. gr. Anger or spleen : — By the gods You shall digest the venom of your spleen, Though it do split you. {Jul Ccvs. IV. iii. 46). My higli-bloicn pride. {Hen. VIII. III. ii. 361). The broken rancour of your IiigJi-sicofn hearts. (A'/c7/. ///. Il.ii. 117). Czesar's ambition which sicetled so much. {Cynib. III. i. 49). Blown ambition. (Lear IV. iv. 27). I have seen th' ambitious ocean swell and rage. iyul. Ca^s. I. iii. 6). Swell in their pride. {Lucrece 432). Othello, in his anger and hatred, and hunger for revenge, says : — 240 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. Swell, bosom, with thy fraught ; For 'tis of aspics' tongues / {Olh. III. iii. 449). 12. Another of Bacon's physiological metaphors is shown in the following passage from his Essay of " Seditions " : — " He that turneth the humours back and maketh the wound bleed inwards endangereth malign ulcers and pernicious imposthumations. " This refers to that mode of preventing seditious rising which consists in '''giving moderate liberty for griefs and discontentments to evaporate," The same sentiment is expressed in a speech in Parliament (1810). "Take away liberty of Parliament, the griefs of the subject will bleed inwards. Sharp and eager humours will not evaporate, and then they must exulcerate, and so may endanger the sovereignty itself." (" Life " IV. 177). And again: "These things mought be dissembled, and so things left to bleed inwards." (''Life" V. 45). And describing a condition of stifled discontent in Henry VH. 's reign, he says that the methods of repression " made the King rather more absolute, than more safe. For bleeding inwards and shut vapours strangle soonest and oppress most." (Works VL 153). So Henry IV., lamenting over the wild conduct of his son, says : — The blood weeps from my lieart when I do shape In forms imaginary, the unguided days And rotten times that you shall look upon When I am sleeping with my ancestors. * (2 Hen. IV. IV. iv. 58). and the Prince in his turn says : — " My heart bleeds inwardly that my fatiier is so sick ; and keeping such vile company as thou art hath in reason taken from me all ostentation of sorrow." {lb. II. ii. 51). Timon's servant says : I bleed inwardly for my Lord. {Tim. A. I. ii. 211). WOUNDS SEARCHED. 24I And still more distinctly is the metaphor employed by Hamlet : — This is the imposthume of much wealth and peace That inward breaks, and shows no cause without Why the man dies. {Ham. IV. iv. 27). 13. To this class of parallels the following also may be referred. Bacon in his subsidy speech (A.D. 1593) says : — " We are here to search the wounds of the realm, and not to skin them over. " ("Life" I. 223). In the observations on a Libel, he uses the expression : " Having lately with much difficulty rather smoothed and skinned over than healed and extinguished the commotion of Aragon." (" Life " L 163). The 3rd of the Meditationes Sacrcs commences with the aphorism, " To a man of perverse and corrupt judgment, all instruction or persuasion is fruitless and contemptible which begins not with discovery and laying open of the distemper and ill complexion of the mind which is to be recured, as a plaster is unseasonably applied before the wound be searched." (Works VH. 244). The Shakespearean echoes of these passages are perfect : — It will but skin and film the ulcerous place, Whilst rank corruption, mining all within, Infects unseen. (Hani. III. iv. 147). Authority, though it err like others. Hath yet a kind of medicine in itself That skins the vice o' the top. {Mcas. M. II. ii. 134). Now to tlic bottom dost thou search ni}^ wound. {Tif. A.U. iii. ?62). Alas, poor shepherd ! searching of thy wound I have by hard adventure found my own. {As You Like II II. iv. 44). The truth you speak doth lack some gentleness, R 242 SHAKESPEARE STUDIES IN BACONIAN LIGHT. And time to speak it in : you rub the