UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION 
 COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BENJ '° E WHEELER ' »»»««•* 
 
 THOMAS FORSYTH HUNT, Dean an d Director 
 
 BERKELEY h. e. van norman, vice-director and dean 
 
 University Farm School 
 
 CIRCULAR No. 186 
 November, 1917 
 
 POULTRY ON THE FARM 
 
 By J. E. DOUGHERTY 
 
 The best place to raise more poultry and eggs at least cost is on 
 the farm where the feed, to a large extent, is grown. Poultry will 
 pick up from the fields and around the barns a large amount of feed 
 that would otherwise be wasted and will turn this feed into eggs and 
 poidtry meat. 
 
 How many fowls a farmer should keep will be governed by the 
 size of his farm and the percentage of the total ration that the farm 
 can supply, as well as his personal attitude toward chickens. A lay- 
 ing fowl will consume approximately 75 pounds of grain and mash 
 per year, nearly all of which can be grown on the farm, as is clearly 
 shown in the following simple, yet well-balanced laying ration 
 designed to meet the present war conditions : 
 
 Grain Mixture Dry Mash Mixture 
 
 15 lbs. whole barley 5 lbs. ground barley 
 
 15 lbs. whole milo 5 lbs. wheat bran 
 
 5 lbs. wheat shorts 
 
 2 lbs. soy bean or linseed meal 
 
 3 lbs. meatscrap or fishscrap 
 Vi lb. granulated charcoal 
 
 in 
 
 lb. sifted dairy salt 
 
 Feterita, Egyptian corn, Indian corn, etc. may be substituted for 
 all or a part of the milo in the grain formula and plump oats for 
 the barley. Where sour skim milk or buttermilk can be kept before 
 the fowls in drinking vessels so that they consume from 35 to 40 
 pounds of milk per 100 fowls per day, investigations conducted at 
 the California Experiment Station indicate that no meatscrap, fish- 
 scrap, soybean meal, linseed meal, etc., need be fed in the mash, as 
 the milk will take the place of other high-protein feeds. 1 Milk is one 
 of the very best animal feeds that can be fed to poultry and both the 
 small and large dairyman may well consider the use of poultry as a 
 most profitable means of utilizing such dairy byproducts as skim 
 milk, buttermilk, whey, etc. 
 
 i Eeport of the College of Agriculture and the Agricultural Experiment Station 
 of University of California for year ending June 30, 1915, p. 38. 
 
A flock of farm fowls should be able to pick up a portion of their 
 feed in the fields and corrals so that the farmer would only have to 
 furnish that portion of the total feed required, which the fowls could 
 not secure for themselves on range. If a ration proportioned simi- 
 larly to the one given above were used, in which 3/5 lb. grain is fed, 
 with 2/5 lb. mash to supply the fowls with a balanced egg-making 
 diet, and if the farm grew all the barley and milo needed, then all 
 the grain plus 5/20 of the mash, or a total of 14/20 or 7/10 of the 
 feed consumed by the fowls, could be grown on the farm. If wheat 
 were raised and the shrunken wheat, wheat screenings and wheat 
 otherwise unsuitable for milling purposes were substituted for the wheat 
 bran and shorts in the mash given above, then 9/10 of all the grain 
 and mash fed to the hens would be grown on the same farm with the 
 chickens. It is evident, then, that on any farm growing the different 
 grains as set forth in the preceding paragraph, the farmer could 
 furnish from the farm 7/10 to 9/10 of the feed needed by his fowls, 
 over and above that "picked up" by the fowls about the fields and 
 corrals. If plenty of milk were available, all the feed required by 
 the fowls could be supplied from the farm. Of course, the wider 
 the range allowed the fowls, and the more seeds, grains, insects, 
 worms, etc., they could harvest for themselves, the less the farmer 
 would have to feed them from the feed bin. 
 
 Nearly every farm in California keeps upwards of fifty fowls 
 at the least. It is contended by many that such a small number of 
 fowls can be indifferently cared for and still be profitable as they 
 should be able to pick up most of their living about the barns and 
 fields, and although given practically no care, should lay fairly well 
 because of the combined advantages of small numbers and free range 
 conditions. These fowls are kept on the farm primarily with the 
 idea of supplying the family larder and are not looked upon as a 
 money-making part of the farm work — hence the lack of care. They 
 are generally plagued with vermin, have never been bred or culled 
 for egg production, are kept in a dirty, close or draughty and vermin - 
 infested henhouse and not given even half a chance to make good. 
 As a result, they lay almost entirely in the spring alone and not very 
 well then; the larder is therefore supplied for only a brief part of 
 the year. The net profit from fowls handled in such a negligent 
 manner as compared with equal numbers of well-cared-for fowls 
 should bring home to any fair-minded person the dollars-and-cents 
 desirability of expending the time and care required to make the 
 poultry flock produce the kind of returns which well-managed flocks 
 can produce. If it be worth while to breed and handle other livestock 
 on the farm for increased production, why not poultry? 
 
 Poultry which are as carefully and intelligently looked after as 
 the dairy herd, hogs, or beef cattle are fully as profitable, if not 
 more so when the amount of otherwise wasted feed they pick up on 
 range is considered, per dollar invested as any other kind of livestock 
 on the farm. 
 
 The following statement will give an idea of the approximate 
 expense and income from a farm flock of 300 hens. 
 
Summary of Expense and Income from 300 Hens 
 
 5% interest on house for 300 fowls (w $1.00 $ 15.00 
 
 5% interest on 300 fowls @ $1.50 22.50 
 
 20% depreciation on 300 fowls minus 10% mortality 81.00 
 
 5% depreciation on house 15.00 
 
 10% mortality loss (30 fowls @ $1.50 each, aver, value for year) 45.00 
 
 Cost of % of total feed consumption of 75 lbs. per hen year, assuming 
 
 fowls will pick % of their feed in fields, @ 2%c lb 438.90 
 
 8550 lbs. straw, allowing 30 lbs. per fowl per year, (a) $4 per ton 17.10 
 
 850 lbs. grit and shell @ 80c per 100 (fowls allowed % shell and % grit) 6.80 
 
 Incidentals (offset by manure) 35.60 
 
 Total expense $676.90 
 
 Expense per hen $ 2.37 
 
 11 doz. eggs per hen from 285 hens (average) @ 36c per doz 1128.60 
 
 14,250 lbs. manure, allowing 50 lbs. per fowl, @ $5 ton 35.60 
 
 Total income $1164.20 
 
 Labor income (profit) $487.30 
 
 Labor income per hen $1.70 
 
 In Tulare County is an outstanding example of what can be done 
 with poultry on the farm. The Tulare Co-operative Poultry Asso- 
 ciation stands as a monument of what can be accomplished with the 
 hen on the farm where the feed is largely grown, if she be given a 
 fair chance. The members of this association are almost entirety 
 farmers, each with from 20 to 100 or more acres, and poultry is but 
 one of the crops each farmer raises. None of them are primarily 
 poultry raisers, yet they have built up one of the most successful 
 co-operative poultry associations in the state. The secret of their 
 success is that all of them raise poultry with the same care and atten- 
 tion to detail that is given the other stock. They have learned that 
 fowls, like anything else, pay in proportion to the intelligent care 
 given them and that it pays good, substantial dividends to employ 
 that kind of care. 
 
 In March, 1917, these ranchers delivered to their association from 
 a few to as high as 1495 dozen eggs each, over and above home con- 
 sumption. In July, 1917, 623 dozen eggs was the largest number 
 delivered by any one rancher. 
 
 Poultry on the farm should be given free range over the fields 
 as far as possible in order that they may be able to pick up as much 
 of their feed as they can. Small yards may be provided, however, 
 to be used during the breeding season for one or more small pens 
 selected early in the spring for use as breeders to produce the spring 
 chicks. It may also be necessary to have medium-sized yards attached 
 to the hen houses so that all the fowls can be penned up for a time 
 when it is desired to keep them out of certain fields or orchard plots, 
 or they may be confined to the henhouses if not kept shut up for 
 more than two or three days at a time. The number and size of 
 yards, if any, will be governed by specific conditions on each farm. 
 
A well-designed and constructed henhouse should be built in 
 which the fowls are always fed all of the feed given to them and in 
 which they are made to roost at all times. 2 If fowls are taught to 
 use the henhouse from the very first by shutting them up in it for 
 three to seven days, if necessary, when first put in, no trouble should 
 be experienced with their roosting in the trees and outbuildings. Pro- 
 viding good clean nests in the henhouse and not letting the fowls out 
 on range too early in the morning till they get thoroughly used to 
 laying in these nests, will result in practically all eggs being laid in 
 the henhouse and in very few stolen nests. A dirty henhouse, full 
 of mites and other vermin, will drive hens to the trees to roost and 
 the fence corners to lay. A hen is a creature of habit. Give her 
 a comfortable henhouse and accustom her to use it and she will do 
 so without further bother. Such a henhouse means more fresh-laid 
 eggs to be collected daily, as fewer nests are stolen, and it means 
 fewer stolen chickens because the hens can be locked up at night. 
 
 In many sections of the state, poultry are being run in orchards. 
 The advantages urged in favor of this practice are (1) that the 
 poultry manure is valuable as a fertilizer for the trees if properly 
 used; (2) that poultry are a welcome source of income during the 
 growing, unproductive period of the young orchard and the poor 
 crop years of the bearing orchard, in addition to increasing the in- 
 come at other times; (3) the trees furnish much needed summer shade 
 to the fowls; (4) both the trees and the fowls can use the same land 
 and two incomes can be secured per acre. 
 
 There are also a number of disadvantages in running fowls in 
 orchards, and whether the advantages will outweigh the disadvan- 
 tages in any specific case will undoubtedly depend upon the kind of 
 orchard, value of the land, soil conditions and many other factors 
 that cannot be entered into in a brief discussion of this kind. It is 
 simply desired to point out that orchards do offer possibilities for 
 poultry raising and many growers have found it profitable to use 
 their orchards in this way. 
 
 POULTEY MANUEE 
 
 The value of livestock as a medium for marketing much of the 
 vegetable products grown on the farm so as to secure the manurial 
 by-product, is becoming more and more keenly appreciated. The 
 general rancher growing alfalfa, grain, etc., who feeds a good share 
 of these products to livestock and then markets this stock, should be 
 able not only to secure his feed at a lower cost than if it were to be 
 purchased from outside sources, with additional handling and trans- 
 portation charges included in the price paid, but the manure from 
 the stock can be returned to the land to replace the fertility removed 
 from it in the form of crops. Poultry produce about 30 pounds of 
 roost manure and perhaps 20 pounds of day droppings per bird per 
 year. Three hundred chickens should produce about 41/2 tons of 
 night droppings and 3 tons of day droppings a year. 
 
 2 Plans for a farm poultry laying house will be furnished those contemplating 
 the construction of such a building upon request by the Poultry Division.