AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF THOMAS WRIGHT. r AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF THOMAS WRIGHT, OF BIRKENSHAW, IN THE COUNTY OF YORK. 1736-1797. f . EDITED BY HIS GRANDSON, THOMAS WRIGHT, M.A, F.S.A., ETC. CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE IMPERIAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE. LONDON: JOHN RUSSELL SMITH, SOHO SgUARE. 1864. PREFACE. HE writer of the following Autobio- graphy dates that it was defigned for the inftru&ion and amufement of his children and defcendants ; but it has been thought by feveral friends who have read it, and whofe judgment I refpe6t, that it contains much that might be inftrutive and amufmg to other people's children alfo, and I have, therefore, ventured to give it to the public. Too long a fpace of time has elapfed to leave any perfonal feelings or interefts to be affected by it, and I myfelf in printing it look upon it only as a remarkable hiftorical record, which gives us a curious and ftriking picture I may, perhaps, add almoft unique of domeftic life among a very important clafs of Englifh fociety during the latter half of the laft century, in what has fince become one of the greateft and moft active manufactur- ing diftrits in our ifland. Moreover, it prefents a very remarkable view of the effe&s, even on the relations of the domeftic homeftead, of thofe violent religious party-feelings and contentions 2063579 viii PREFACE. which raged more in this part of England than anywhere, during the laft century, and which, though they gave perhaps not an unhealthy activity to men's minds, were certainly far from improving their tempers, or encouraging among them fentiments of mutual charity. Thomas Wright, of Birkenfhaw, was, as will be feen by his own writings, no ordinary man. Endowed with very confiderable talents, and with an earned defire for knowledge and a love of lite- rature, which might have raifed him to a diftin- guimed pofition in fame, he evidently, from his own account, often regretted that he had no guardians of his youth who could appreciate the real bent of his mind, and give him the educa- tion which his fortune, though not great, as well as his inclinations claimed. But left an orphan in his earlieft infancy, with none but diftant rela- tives, who thought only of fecuring a {hare of his property at firft a fpoiled child, and fubfequently a neglected boy, nothing could fwerve his mind from its natural bent, and fome of his manufcripts in my pofleflion, as well as the reports of thofe who knew him, prove that he pofTefled an ex- traordinary extent of reading, a large amount of mifcellaneous knowledge, with power and judg- ment in the application of it, which muft have made him an object of refpecl: among the fociety of what was then rather a wild part of Yorkfhire. At an early age he went through the ufual courfe of Latin in the old and juftly celebrated free Gram- PREFACE. ix mar School at Bradford, which was the whole amount of what may be called his liberal education ; and the writer of his brief " Life," prefixed to the fecond edition of his " Familiar Religious Converfation," printed in 1812, dates that, " He was accounted very clever while at fchool ; and when he went home, it was with the reputation of being a youth of facetious difpofition, and of the moft ready wit and invention." This part of Yorkfhire had always been a ftronghold of the Nonconformifts, and the Ef- tablifhed Church was comparatively weak in face of the violent diflenting Calvinifm which reigned there ; but at this time the far more liberal Ar- minianifm of Wefley and his party was labour- ing to eftablifh itfelf, and, as might be expect- ed, met with the moft unfcrupulous perfecu- tion. Thomas Wright, of Birkenfhaw, had a large fhare of the chivalrous in his character, and he took up the caufe of the new fe& quite as much becaufe it was that of the weak opprefled by the ftrong, as for the conformity of their opinions with his own liberal views. He tells us in the following pages the rather curious way in which he became firft acquainted with the Me- thodifts, as the followers of Wefley were already named ; his feelings in their favour, already well known, were no doubt ftrengthened by his mar- riage into a family who belonged to the leading and moft violent Calvinifts of this diftri&, and whofe hoftility difturbed the peace of his own x PREFACE. family and the profpects of at leaft one of his children; yet he poflefled no fe&arian fpirit, and in fpite of the ftatement in the "Life" juft alluded to, appended to his " Modern Religious Converfation," I do not believe that my grand- father was ever what they call a profefling Me- thodift that is, a member of the Society, unlefs it were juft at the clofe of his life. He has de- fcribed his religious feelings very candidly in the following lines of this poem, where he, in his aflumed character of " Richard,'' is accufed of being an Arminian, or Wefleyan (I quote from the firft edition) : " I own ingenuoufly to you, I think their dolrines nearly true } I am not, Jemmy, of their feft, Yet I the people much refpeft, Wifh well to what they chiefly teach, And often go to hear them preach. But bigot am I not fo hearty To people, principles, or party, But that if any one can mew My tenets are not juft and true, I will renounce them gladly then, And learn to think with wifer men." Neverthelefs, " Tommy Wright," as he was popularly called in the phrafeology of the north country, was thechampion of the Wefleyans in this diftri<5t, contributed largely to their triumph over perfecution, and obtained the acquaintance and efteem of the great leaders of the Arminian party, including fuch men as John Wefley himfelf and Fletcher of Madeley. An interefting account of PREFACE. xi his vifit to the latter in Shropfliire, in the year 1773, in the courfe of an excurfion for the pur- pofe of obtaining fubfcriptions towards the ex- penfe of building a Wefleyan Chapel at Height, within half a mile of his own houfe, is given in the following pages. The building of this chapel appears to have given great offence to the Birk- heads of Brookhoufes, and explains the violent quarrel with his wife defcribed in the following narrative (page 104). He appears to have made the acquaintance of John Wefley during fome of the excurfions of the latter to preach his doctrines and principles in this part of the country, perhaps nearly about the fame date. From this time he entered warmly into the difputes between the Calvinifts and Wefleyans, and his alliance was the more valuable as he could handle with con- fiderable power the rather formidable weapons of fatire and ridicule j and, as his mind had a ftrong poetical turn, he ufually compofed his con- troverfial writings in verfe. Among the moft violent, and it may be added, the moft abufive of the writers of that time againft the Arminians, and efpecially againft Fletcher of Madeley, was Richard Hill, Efq.,of Hawkeftonein Shropfliire, anceftor of the prefent Lord Hill, who fucceeded his father as Sir Richard Hill, Bart., in 1783, and was one of the reprefentatives of Shropfliire in Parliament during a great part of his life. In his " Modern Familiar Religious Converfation," the author characterizes this champion of the xii PREFACE. Calvinifts, who was in the habit of prefuming rather too much on his ariftocratic pofition, in the following lines : "Though high-born, felf-important Hill, In height of Calviniftic zeal, For want of better weapons, fight With fcorn, contempt, reproach, and fpite ; And compafs you on every fide With laughter or difdainful pride ; With this and that poor ftormy rail, Of bathing-tub, or comet-tail." In 1775, Richard Hill, in a pamphlet entitled " Logica Wefleienfis," publifhed one of the moft fcurrilous perfonal attacks on Wefley he had yet written, under the bantering title of a " Heroic Poem " in his praife, in reply to which Thomas Wright wrote a very clever parody, under the title of "A Heroic Poem in praife of Richard Hill, Efq." which is printed in the Appendix to the prefent volume. It appears that he was prevented from publiming this poem by the opinion of "one of no mean name," that fuch an anfwer to the Calviniftic afiailant was only returning " railing for railing" the perfon here referred to being, I fufpe&, John Wefley himfelf ; but he fent a written copy of it to the Calviniftic champion at Hawkeftone. Three years after this he pub- limed a more general defence of the Arminian party, alfo compofed in verfe, and entitled (a parody on the title of Hogarth's celebrated pic- ture) " A Modern Familiar Religious Converfa- tion." The origin of this book is explained in PREFACE. xiii the author's addrefs to the reader. "The occa- fion of the following piece was rather accidental than defigned. Having had frequent occafion to take notice of the great variety of differing opinions amongft the profeflbrs of Chriftianity, and to remark their fpirit, practice, and manner of teaching each other, which I had done with fome degree of accuracy, and having been one day engaged with an acquaintance in a religious difpute, it afterwards proved an occafion of ex- citing in my mind the following thoughts: I imagined to myfelf a perfon in great fufpenfe with refpecl: to his religious opinion, yet ex- tremely defirous to learn, and fincerely willing to embrace the truth. I next imagined this perfon, in his fearch after truth, applying himfelf to the different fe6ts of Chriftian profeflbrs one after another, for inftru&ion and direction : he would find every fucceflive party he applied to would, in its turn, afTure him, in the moft pofitive man- ner, that theirs was the only true fyfterh of reli- gion, the only fyftem that was agreeable to the Word of God throughout ; he would find them very ready alfo to cenfure and condemn (with no fmall degree of acrimony in general) every other party as (more or lefs) blind, ignorant, out of the way of truth, and involved in error. He would further find that every party would readily allow that the Word of God was uniformly and invari- ably true ; and at the fame time he would find every one of them profefling to ground their xiv PREFACE. various, and even dire&ly oppofite, opinions upon the fame Bible, and attempting to prove the truth of their incompatible fentiments from the fame book of God ! Under thefe circumftances, I beheld my imaginary inquirer in the utmoft perplexity and confufion j he had penetration enough to difcover, and generofity enough to difapprove, all the unfair, unkind, and unchrif- tian practices more or lefs made ufe of by moft parties, in order to blacken and difcredit thofe who differed from them in their religious fenti- ments ; yet, at the fame time, he had fenfe enough to perceive, and candour enough to own, that, amongft all or moft of the profefling parties, many perfons might be found of great natural abilities, various and deep learning, ftricl: morals, and unblemifhed characters, both as men and Chriftians, in every practical refpe&. Yet all this did but ferve to heighten his dilemma and increafe his uncertainty : and being refolved to deal fairly and ingenuoufly with his own foul, and not to efpoufe any fentiment merely becaufe fuch a great man, or fuch a fafliionable or creditable party, had efpoufed it, I faw him fairly forced at laft to have recourfe to prayer and the Word of God, that by comparing what each party in its turn advanced for truth with that unerring ftandard, fairly taken together, he might be able to judge for himfelf. Being in this train of thought, and having fomething of a poetical turn, I put down (dialogue-wife) fome of the firft para- PREFACE. xv graphs of the following eflay, without any farther defign, at that time, than to write a fhort copy of verfes for my own amufement ; but the fub- je& growing upon me as I proceeded, the con- fequence was, I have drawn it out to the prefent length." The further hiftory of this book is told as follows by the Wefleyan writer of the "Life" of the author given with the fecond and pofthumous edition, who informs us that,