S ! 
 
Sheldon & Conipanys 2'cxi-jSooA's. 
 
 OLNErS SERIES OF MATHEMATICS. 
 
 T 
 
 -30 
 
 LI BR AR Y 
 
 OF THE 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. 
 
 ^; GIF^T OK 
 
 
 ^^^L 
 
 <y^- 
 
 Received ^^Jr.,'..,. , tS^i^. 
 
 A c cessions No. _ ^_^-<P^/y Shelf No. 
 
 •30 
 
 etry. (Univ. Ed., with Tables of Logarithms.) 
 
 Olncifs Elements of Geometrij mid TvUjonom- 
 
 etry, (University Edition, Avithout Tables.) 
 
 Olney's General Geometry and Calculus 
 
 The universal favor with which these books have been received 
 by educators in all parts of the country, leads the publishers to 
 think that they have supplied a felt want in our educational ap- 
 pliances. 
 
 There is one feature which characterizes this series, so unique, 
 and yet so eminently practical, that we feel desirous of callin'T 
 special attention to it. It is 
 
 The facility with which the books can be used for classes of 
 
 ail grades, and in schools of the widest 
 
 diversity of purpose. 
 
 Each volume in the series is so constructed that it may be used 
 with equal ease by the youngest and least disciplined who should 
 be pursuing its theme, and by those wlio in more mature years 
 and with more ample preparation enter upon the study. 
 
 !<e!S;SI!!!!!!IIS!S!i!8i!!H 
 
ShchloJi tO Co?)tj)fti>y's 'Z'txt-'JJooks, 
 
 ■IGO pages. By Elkoy 
 
 Avcvjj's Xatttral I'hilosopliij. 
 M. Avery, A. M. 
 
 The book is an earnest and tminenthj successful alUmpt to present tht facts 
 of the Science in a logical and compretvensible manner. The chapter t^j)eciaU>f 
 devoted to Energy has bieii i)roiiouiiced, by competent and discriminating 
 judges, the mo!^t satisfactory tliat has yet been written. 
 
 The chapter on Ekctricity has met with the warmest expressions of ap- 
 pro\al from prominent teachers, school superintendents, and professors. The 
 other cliapters are equally good. 
 
 The tyiK Is large and clear, the engravings arc about four hundred in num- 
 ber, and all artistically executed. The printers and the engravers have tried to 
 make this book as clear cut as the statements and definitions of the author. 
 
 A Manual of English Literature. By Heney Morley, 
 Professor of Euglish Literature in University College, London. 
 Thoroughly revised, with an entire rearrangement of matter, 
 and with numerous retrenchments and additions, by Moses 
 CoiT Tyler, Professor of English Literature in the L'uiversity 
 of Michigan. 
 
 For advanced instruction in English Literature, no book has hitherto 
 existed which is now satisfactory either to teachers or students. While each 
 book has its own merits, it has also defects so serious as to stand in the way 
 of its complete success. 
 
 In the " Mantal of Englisq Literature " now published,— the joint pro- 
 duction of two distinguished authors and practical teachers, one representing 
 a leading university in England, and the other representing a leading univer- 
 sity in America,— we believe that the book so long needed i-< at last to be had ; 
 a book that must at once, by its own merits, take the precedence of all others 
 in this department, in the principal seminaries, colleges, and universities of 
 the country. 
 
 Professor Henry Morley, of the University of London, is one of the most 
 distinguished living authorities in all matters pertaining to English literary 
 history and criticism. He Ls fifty-seven years of age ; has written many suc- 
 cessful books in general literature. 
 
 Professor Moses Coit Tyler, though a much yousgcr man than Professor 
 Morley, has l)ccn also for many years a practical teacher of English Literature 
 to advanced students in a great university; has had a varied and successful 
 career in general authorship; and especially by his elaborate ''History of 
 American Literature," ha.* come to sustain a relation to literary history in this 
 country similar to that held by Professor Morley in England. The combined 
 labors of two such men ought to give us the long-needed Text-Book in Eng- 
 lish Literature. 
 
THE 
 
 ELEMENTS 
 
 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 FRANCIS WAYLAND, 
 
 I^TB FBE81DENT OF BBOWN UNITEBSITT, AND AXTTHOE OP ELEMENTS 
 OF MORAL SCIENCE, ETC., ETC. 
 
 XWELrTH THOUSAlfD. 
 
 V 
 
 ^ OF THR 
 
 :^ 
 
 SIVBESITT] 
 
 NEW YORK: 
 
 Sheldon & Company, 
 
 No. 8 MURRAY STREET. 
 
 ^«kSl 
 
COLLEGE AND SCHOOL TEXT-BOOKS 
 
 BY 
 
 EMINENT PRACTICAL TEACHERS. 
 
 * .^1^3/ 
 
 THE NOEMAL MATHEMATICAL SEEIES. W33 £^_ 
 
 BTODDAED'S JUVENILE MENTAL ARITHMETIC. 
 
 STODDARD'S INTELLECTUAL ARITHMETIC. , g ^A, 
 
 STODDARD'S RUDIMENTS OF ARITHMETIC; ' ^ 
 
 STODDARD'S NEW PRACTICAL ARITHMETIC. 
 
 STODDARD & HKNKLE'S ELEMENTARY ALGEBRA. 
 
 STODDARD & HENKLE'S UNIVERSITY ALGEBRA. 
 
 •METHOD OF TEACHING AND KEY TO INTELLECTUAL ARITHMETia 
 
 •KEY TO STODDARD S PRACTICAL ARITHMETIC. 
 
 •KEY TO S. & H.S ELEMENTARY ALGEBRA. 
 
 •KEY TO S. & H. S UNIVERSITY ALGEBRA. 
 
 BULLIONS' SEEIES OP GEAMMAES, ETC. 
 
 INTRODUCTION TO AN'ALYI. AND PRAC. ENGLISH GKAMMAB. 
 
 ANALYTICAL AND PRACTICAL ENGLISH GRAM.MAR. 
 
 EXERCISES IN ANALYSIS AND PARSING. 
 
 LATIN LESSONS, by Spencer, introductory to Bullions' 
 
 LATIN GRAMMAR. 
 
 •LATIN READER. *LATIN EXERCISES!. 
 
 CiRSAR'S COMM. CICERO'S ORATIONS. SALLUST. 
 
 •LATIN ENGLISH DICTIONARY (with Synonyms). 
 
 GREEK LESSONS. GREEK GRAMMAR. 
 
 •GREEK READER. , ^ . ^ ^ COOi iiR"S VIRGIL. 
 
 -^^^f^.--^.-.. 
 
 EEENCH ^L GEEMAU. 
 
 KEETEL'S NEW METHOD Oi' LEARNL-<G FRENCH. 
 PEISSNER'S ELEMENTS OF THE GERNiAN LANGUAGE. 
 
 PHYSIOLOGY, LOGIC, ASTEOITOMY, ETC. 
 
 HOOKER'S HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY. FIRST BOOK. 
 
 WHATELY'S ELEM. OF LOGIC. ELEM. OF RHETORIC, 
 
 THOMPSON'S LAWS OF THOUGHT. 
 
 WAYLANDS INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 BROCKLESBY'3 ASTRONOMY. *METEOROLOGy 
 
 •BROCKLESBY'S WONDERS OF THE MICROSCOPE. 
 
 PALMERS PRACTICAL BOOK-KEEPING. 
 
 CLNI:Y'S school geography and atlas (Revised). 
 
 COMSTOCK'S NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. CHEMISTRY. 
 
 JJso several other Text Books by povy.1 Authora. for whicL, see on Cntalogl*. 
 MKv'i i« furnished f^rratis. We furnii-h to Toachers for Examination, p<>;tp.ild bf 
 l.«il, a copy of anj of the above books not havin;: a * annexeJ, at half price. Tho«« 
 rArked wilh a * we send on reci-ipt of the prices annexed. 
 
 Entered according to Act of Consrress. In the year 1S54. by Pniups, Sampson A C3ft, 
 In the Cle'k's Office of the District Court for the District of Massachu»ett» 
 
eKEFACE. 
 
 The fol levying pages contain the substance of the Lectxrei 
 which, for several years, have been delivered to the classes in 
 Intellectual Philosophy, in Brown University. 
 
 Having been intended for oral delivery, they were, in many 
 respects, niodiSed by the circumstances of their origin. Hence, 
 illustrations have been introduced more freely than would other- 
 wise have seemed necessary. In preparing them for the press, 
 however. I was led to consider the class of persons for whose 
 use th'iy were principally designed. I remembered the diffi- 
 culty of fixing definitely in the mind of the pupil the nature 
 and limits of subjective truth ; and therefore allowed my instruc- 
 tions to retain in general the form which they had previously 
 assumed. Whether I have in this respect judged wisely, it is 
 not for me to determine. 
 
 I have not entered upon the discussion of many of the topics 
 which have called into exercise the acumen of the ablest meta- 
 physicians. Intended to serve the purposes of a text-book, it 
 was necessary that the volume should be compressed within a 
 compass adapted to the time usually allotted to the study of 
 this science in the colleges of our country. I have, therefore, 
 ntteniptcd to present and illustrate the important truths in intel. 
 lectual philosophy, rather than the inferences which may bo 
 drawn from them, or the doctrines which they may presuppose. 
 These may bo pursued to ajiy length, at the option of the teacher. 
 If I have not entered upon these discussions, I hope that I iiavi 
 prepared the way for their more ample and truthful develop- 
 
PRETACK. 
 
 It lu8 been mj desire to render this work an aid to ineola< 
 naprowtmemfL For this purp>ose, I hare added practical Bug* 
 gCBtioae on tbe cultirution of the sereral faculties. Kanicft^ 
 nundeJ joang men frequently err in their attcmptB at iH:ll-iin- 
 proTcoitat. It has Beeme<J to me, therefore, that a work cf thii 
 ki>i vmld be manifest! j imperfect, did it not. direct! j aa wel! 
 W iodirectlj, aid the student in hia efiorta to di»ci{ line abd 
 ftrengthen hifl intellectual energies. 
 
 In order to encourage more extensive reading upon the buI»- 
 )ect than can be furuii»hed in a text-book, I have added refer- 
 eooes to a numl^tir of works of enBy acccbe, Bpecifyiiig the [docxj 
 in which the topics treated of were dij>cuhi>ed. In thia laL»or, I 
 have availe-l myBcif of the aa«ii>tanoe of mj former pujtil*, Mr. 
 Samcel BacxjKB, now iuutructor in Greek, in thin Univcruitj, 
 and Mr. Lcciue W. hASCUorr, of Worcester, MaBS. To theM 
 gentlemen the student is indebted fur whatever benefit he maj 
 derive from thLs feature of the work. 
 
 For the manj imperfe<;tion8 of this volume, the author con- 
 Boles himuelf with the reflection, that it has lx;en written and 
 prepare*] for the press under the pressure of other iin{x*rtant 
 and frequent! J dihtracting avocations. In the humble hop« 
 tliat it maj, nevertheless, facilitate the stud; of tt!* intcrert. 
 ing department of human knowledge, i^ j* with difiir,iwi%. 
 •ul>mitte'i to the ju<igmont of the public 
 
 Baowa Uhivucitt, Sopt 14 1^54. 
 
PREFACE TO TIIE PRESENT EDITION. 
 
 h woA my (lestigTt, soon after thui volnme wan pahlUhed, 
 to snhject it to a thorough revwion, and make irach cor- 
 rections in the text as were evidently needed. I fonnd 
 my*ielf, however, enable at the time to accom plinth my 
 ictention, in conseqaen^^ of several other unexpected and 
 imperative obli'^ations ; and, subiMfqnently, by reason of a 
 long f»eriod of imf>erfect health. I have devot«d to this 
 work the first leisare that I have \jeen able to command ; 
 and have correcte^l the text with all the attention in my 
 power. I hope that I have iraproverl it. 
 
 In this IaV>or I have been greatly anwted by the aid of 
 aijother. Some time since, I received from an anonymon* 
 friend a copioas list of valuable correctionii, of which I 
 have freely availerl myseIC I Like this method of express* 
 ing my sincere gratitade to my onknown benefactor ; and 
 I beg him to receive my thanks for his careful rending o( 
 the text, and for his many valuable suggcstionji. Moii 
 Off these I hAve thankfully adopted. 
 
 ?. WATLASn 
 
MHiiii 
 
 iHii 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 orrsoi'CcnoN and defiothons, • 
 
 en AFTER I. 
 
 THE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. 
 
 Section I. — Of our Knowledge of Matter and Mind 16 
 
 Section I [. — Tbe Perceptive Powers in general, 28 
 
 Section m. — Of our Mode of Intercourse with the External World, . 32 
 
 Section IV. — The Sense of Smell 41 
 
 BtCTioN v. — The Sense of Taste, 46 
 
 Section VI.— The Sense of Hearing, 50 
 
 Section VII. — The Sense of Touch, 59 
 
 Suction VIII.- The Sense of Sight, 63 
 
 Section IX. — Acquired Perceptions, 77 
 
 Section X. —The Nature of the Knowledge which we acquire by the 
 
 Perceptive Powers, °6 
 
 Skction XI — Conception, 103 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 CONSCIOUSNESS, ATTENTION AND REFLECTION. 
 
 Section I. — Consciousness, 110 
 
 Becxion U. — Attention and Reflection, 119 
 
 V en AFTER III. 
 
 ORIGINAL SUGGESTION, OR TUE I NTUITI 0N3 DF THE IXTELLECK'^ 
 
 gicnor I. — The Opinions of Locke, .^180 / 
 
 SiTiON 11. — The Nature of Original Suggestion 18« 
 
 Seltio.s III. — Ideas occasioned by Objects in a State of Rest, . . • 112 
 BtimoN IV. — Suggested Ideas occasioned by Objects in the Condi- 
 tion of Change, 150 
 
 BacnoN V. —Suggested laeaa accompanied by Emotion 168 
 
Tin CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER IV 
 
 PACI 
 
 ABSTBACnOn, < • • . 177 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 MEMORY. 
 
 BwJKON 1. — Association of Ideas, .202 
 
 Sbctiom n. — The Nature of Memory, 228 
 
 BucnoN m. — The Importance of Memory, 245 
 
 Bbction IV. — The Improvement of Memory 254 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 REASOXIXO. 
 Bbction I. — The Nature and Object of Reaioning, and the Manner 
 
 in which it proceeds, 279 
 
 Section H. — The different Kinds of Certainty at which we arrive 
 
 by Reasoning, 307 
 
 Section IIL — Of the Evidence of Testimony, 317 
 
 Section IV. — Other Forms of Reasoning, 338 
 
 Section V. — The Improvement of the Reasoning Powers, 34i 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 IMAGINATION. 
 
 Section L — Nature of the Imagination 351 
 
 Section II. — Portic Imagination, 357 
 
 Section in. — On the Improvement of Poetic Imagijiation, . . . .370 
 Bbction IV. — Philosophical Imagination, ... , , , . 877 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 TASTE. 
 
 BBCnoR L — The Nature of Taste, 381 
 
 Sectiok n. — Taste considered Objectively. Material Qoalities as 
 
 Objects of Taste 302 
 
 teTnoN lEL — Immaterial Qualities as Objects of Taste, .402 
 
 Section IV. — The Emotion of Tajte ; or Taste considered Subjec- 
 tively 4oa 
 
 APPENDIX. 
 
 Note to pai x^, 102 423 
 
 Note to page 115, . r • t ........ 422 
 
INTRODUCTION. 
 
 DEFINITION OF THE INTELLECTUAL POWERS 
 
 Intellectual Philosophy treats of the faculties cTtlic 
 human mind, and of the laws bj which thej are governed. 
 
 The only forms of existence which, in our present state 
 we are capable of knowing, are matter and mind. It is the 
 mind alone that knows. When, therefore, we cognize 
 matter, the olject known, and the subject which knows, are 
 numerically distinct. When, on the other hand, we cog- 
 nize mind, the mind which knows and the mind which ia 
 known are numerically the same. The mind knows, and 
 the mind is the object of knowledge. 
 
 1. The mind becomes cognizant of the existence and qual- 
 ities of matter, that is, of the world external to itself, by 
 means of the Perceptive faculties. It knows not what 
 matter is, or what is the essence of matter, but only its 
 qualities ; that is, its power of aflfecting us in this or that 
 manner. When we say, "This is gold," we do not pretend 
 to know what the essence of gold is, but merely that there 
 is something possessed of certain qualities, or powers of crc- 
 aling in us certain affections. 
 
 2. In a similar manner we become acquainted with tho 
 energies of our own mind. We are not cognizant of the 
 mind itself, but only of the action of its faculties or sensi- 
 bilities. When we th'«ik, remember, or reason; when we 
 
10 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 are jojfui ot iad, when we deliberate or resc ve, we knovk 
 that these ?e\ irul states )f the mind exist, and that they are 
 predicated of the being whom I denominate I, or myself. 
 The power bj which we become cognizant to ourselves of 
 these mental states is called Consciousness. "When, by an 
 act of volition, a particular mental state is made the object 
 of distinct and continuous thought, the act is denominated 
 Rejlectlon. 
 
 3. An idea of perception or of consciousness terminates aa 
 Boon as another idea succeeds it. It is perfect and complete 
 within itself, and is not necessarily connected wnth anything 
 else. I see a ball either at rest or in motion ; I turn my 
 eyes in another direction and perceive a tree or a house ; in 
 a moment afterwards they are both violently thrown down. 
 I am conscious of several separate perceptions, which follow 
 each other in succession. Each one of these mental acts is 
 complete within itself, and might have been connected with 
 no other. We find, however, that these ideas of perception 
 are not ihus disconnected. They do not terminate in them- 
 Belves, but give occasion to other ideas of great importance ; 
 ideas which, but for the acts of perception, could never have 
 existed. Thus, we saw a house standing, we now see it 
 fallen ; there at once arises in the mind the idea of a cause, 
 or of something which has occasioned this change. Several 
 ideas following in succession, occasion the idea of duration. 
 The existence of these secondary ideas under these circum- 
 stances is owing to the constitution of the human mind 
 itself It suggests to us these ideas, which, when once con- 
 ceived, are original and independent. This power of the 
 mind is termed Orl<rinal Suggestion. 
 
 4. The knowledge acquired both by our perceptive facul- 
 ties and by consciousness, as well as much that is given us 
 by original suggestion, is the knowledge of things or acts 
 OS individuals We perceive single objects ; we are con- 
 
DBflKinOX OF TUE INTELLECTUAL POWERS. 11 
 
 icious of single mental states. These pass away and become 
 recollections. The recollections are like their originalS; 
 merely recollections of individuals. Had we no othei 
 power, our knowledt^e would consist of separate isolated 
 ideas, without either cohesion or classification. Our knowl- 
 edge would be all either of single individuals, or of single 
 acts performed by particular agents. When, however, wo 
 reflect upon our knowledge, we find it to be of a totally 
 different character. It is almost all of classes. "With the 
 exception of proper names, all the nouns of a language des- 
 ignate classes ; that is, ideas of genera and species, and not 
 ideas of individuals. There must, therefore, exist a power 
 of the mind by which we transform these ideas of individuals 
 into ideas of generals. We give to this complex power the 
 name of Abstraction. 
 
 5. We have thus far considered the intellectual faculties 
 without reference to the element of time. We, however, all 
 know that the ideas obtained in the past remain with us at 
 this present. The history of our lives from infancy is con- 
 tinually before us, or. at the command of the will, it may be 
 Bpread out before our consciousness. We know that the 
 ideas which we now acquire may be retained forever. Nay, 
 more, we are conscious of a power of recalling at will the 
 knowledge which we have once made our own. The faculty 
 by which we do this is called Metiiory. 
 
 6. Possessed of these powers, we might obtain all the 
 ideas arising from perception, consciousness and original 
 suggestion ; we might modify them into genera and species, 
 we might treasure them up in our memory and recall 
 them at v.ill. But we could proceed no further. Our 
 knowledge would consist wholly of facts, or the informa- 
 tion which we have derived either from our own observa- 
 tion or the observation of others. But this manifestly ig 
 uot our condition. We are able to make use if the knovl- 
 
J 2 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 edge ac(|uired by the powers of which I have spoken, it 
 Buch a manner as to arrive at truth before unknown, truth 
 which these powers could never have revealed to us. Id 
 this manner Ave make use of the facts in geology in order to 
 determine the changes which have taken place in the history 
 of our globe. Thus, from the axioms and definitions of 
 geometry, v,e proceed to demonstrate the profoundest trutha 
 of that science. The faculty by which we thus proceed in 
 the investigation of truth is termed Reason. 
 
 7. Thus far we have treated of those powers which give 
 us knowledge of things and relations actually existing, oi 
 which modify and use this knowledge. Were v;e limited to 
 these, we could consider no conception but as actually true. 
 We could conceive of nothing except that which we hud 
 perceived, or which some one had perceived for us. But we 
 find ourselves endowed with- a' power of taking the element? 
 of our knowledge and combining them together at will. Wo 
 thus form to ourselves pictures of things that never existed, 
 and we give to them form and substance by the various 
 processes of the fine arts. It was this power which con- 
 ceived the group of Laocoon, or Milton's Garden of Eden. 
 We give to this power the name of IinagLnat'xon., 
 
 8. The exercise of all our faculties is generally agreeable, 
 and sometimes is productive of exquisite pleasure. I look at 
 a rainbow, I pursue a demonstration, I behold a successful 
 effort in the fine arts, and in all these cases I am conscious 
 of a peculiar emotion. The causes producing this emotion 
 are unlike, but the mental feeling produced is essentially 
 the same. Every one recognizes it under the name of the 
 beautiful ; and the sensibility by which we become capable 
 of this emotion is called Taste. 
 
 The faculties which will be treated of m the present work 
 may, then, be briefly defined as follows : 
 
 1. The Perceptive faculties are those by which we ''lecoxna 
 
 lllillilSSSillSlillllilHii^^i^HRiii^^ 
 
DEriNITlON OF THE INTELLECTUAL POWERS. IS 
 
 »<X]|Uainted with the existence and [ualities of the external 
 world. 
 
 2. Consciousness is the faculty by which we become 
 cognizant of the operations of our own minds. 
 
 3. Original Suggestion is the faculty which gives rise 
 to original ideas, occasioned by the perceptive faculties or 
 consciousness. 
 
 4. Ahstrnction is the faculty by wliich, from concepti na 
 of individuals, we form conceptions of genera and species, or, 
 in gcnei al, of classes. 
 
 5. Memory is the faculty by which we retain and recall 
 our knowledge of the past. 
 
 6. Reason is that faculty by which, from the use of the 
 knowledge obtained by the other faculties, we are enabled to 
 proceed to other and original knowledge. 
 
 7. Ima gination is that faculty by which, from materials 
 already existing in the mind, we form complicated concep- 
 tions or mental images, according to our own will. 
 
 8. Taste is that sensibility by which we recognize the 
 beauties and deformities of nature or art, deriving pleasure 
 from the one. and suflfering pain from the other. 
 
 It is by no means intended to assert that these are all the ■♦^^ 
 powers of a human soul. Besides these, it is endowed with • if'- 
 conscience, or that faculty^ by which we are capable of 
 moral obligation ; with will^jor that motive force by which 
 we are impelled to action ; with the various emotionSj;/<m- ' „ 
 stincts and biases, which, as observation teaches us, are v\,y 
 parts of a human soul. These are, however, the most im- W-^ 
 portant of those that are purely intellectual. In the follow- 
 ing ]iages we shall consider them in the order in which thej 
 havo been named. 
 
 2 
 
14 IXTROL>UCTION. 
 
 REFERENCES 
 
 TO PASSAGES IJ WHICH ANALOGOOS SUBJECTS ARE TREATED. 
 
 Import.ance of Intellectual Pliilosophy — r Reid's Incjuiry, chap. 1, sec. 1 
 
 DitBcnlty of the study — Reid's Inquiry, chap. 1, sec. 2. 
 
 Cultivation of mind distinguishes us from brutes — Inquiry, chap. 1, 
 Bcc. 2. — X 
 
 What are matter and mind — Reid'^Introduction to Essays on tne In 
 tellectual Powers. ^ ^_ ~ 
 
 Matter and mind relative — Stewart's Introduction to vol. i.; Iteid*) 
 Essays on certain powers, Essay 1, chap. 1. — 
 
 Origin of our knowledge — Locke, Book 2d, ciup. 1, sec 2 — 5 aad 24 
 
 mmmmmmmmmmmm 
 
CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE PERCEPTH^E FACULTIES 
 
 8BC1I0N I. — OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF MATTEK AND MISi/ 
 THERE IS NO REASON FOR SUPPOSING THE ESSENCE 01 
 MATTER AND MIND THE SAME. THE RELATION OF MIND 
 TO MATTER IN OUR PRESENT STATE. 
 
 Op the essence of mind, as I have remarked, we know 
 nothing. All that we are able to aflQrm of it is, that it ia 
 something which perceives, reflects, remembers, believes, 
 imagines, and wills ; but what that something is, which ex 
 crts these energies, we know not. It is only as we are con- 
 scious of the action of these energies that we are conscious 
 of the existence of mind. It is only by the exertion of its 
 own powers that the mind becomes cognizant of their exis- 
 tence. The cognizance of its powers, however, gives us no 
 knowledge of that essence of which they are preilicatcd. 
 
 In these respects, our knowledge of mind is precisely 
 analogous to our knowledge of matter. When we attempt to 
 define matter, we affirm that it is something extended, divis- 
 ible, solid, colored, etc. ; that is, we mention those of ita 
 qualities which are cognizable by our senses. In other 
 w)rds, we affirm that it is something which has the power 
 of aflecting us in this or that manner. "When, however, the 
 question is asked, what is this something of wluch these 
 qualities are predicated, we are silent. The knowledge of 
 Uie '^juaHties gives no knowle<lge of the essence to which 
 
16 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 tLey belong. We cognize the qualities by means of oui 
 perceptive powers ; but we have no power by which we are 
 able to cognize essence, or absolute substance. 
 
 -This does not seem to be the fact by accident, but from 
 necessity. If we reflect upon the nature of our faculties, 
 we shall readily be convinced that, by our perceptive pow- 
 ers, we learn that a particular object affects us in a particu- 
 lar manner, creates in us a certain state of mind, or, in 
 other words, gives us a certain form of knowledge. I look 
 upon snow, and there is created in my mind the idea of 
 white. I look upon gold, I have at once the idea of yellow. 
 Besides this, there is another idea created, which is, that 
 this quality, or power of creating in me this notion, belonga 
 to the object which I contemplate. I thus not only gain 
 the idea of white or yellow, but the additional conviction 
 that snow is white and gold is yellow. 
 
 The same remarks apply to our knowledge of mind. I 
 am conscious of perception, of recollection, of pleasure, or 
 pain. I thus acquire a notion of these several mental acts, 
 and thus a certain form of knowledge is given to me. Be- 
 sides this, I have an instinctive belief that the mental en- 
 ergy which gives rise to this particular form of knowledge 
 is predicated of the thinking being whom I call I, or myself. 
 If the knowledge which we derive from perception and con- 
 sciousness be analyzed, I think it will be found to go thug 
 far, but that, from the constitution of our nature, it can go 
 no farther. 
 
 But, while our knowledge of mind and our knowledge of 
 matter agree in this respect, that neither of them gives ug 
 any information concerning essences, these two forms of 
 knowledge are in other respects quite dissimilar. 
 
 1. In the first place, it is obvious that the energies of the 
 one and the qualities of the other are made known to us by 
 iifferent powers of the mind. The qualities cf matter ara 
 
 kkkkkmkkkmkkim^kkk^^^^^^^ 
 
THE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. Vt 
 
 revealed to us by our perceptive faculties m which (ui 
 npiritual and material natures are intimately united. The 
 energies of mind are revealed to us by consciousness, one of 
 the elements exclusively of our spiritual nature. It ia 
 almost needless to remark, here, that this difference in 'the 
 mode in which these forms of knowledge are revealed tc ug 
 does not affect the evidence of the truth of either. Percep- 
 tion and consciousness are both original and legitimate 
 bources of belief. We cannot philosophically deny the ex- 
 istence of either. The world without us and the world 
 within us, the me and the tiot me, are both given to us by 
 the principles of our constitution as ultimate facts,, which, 
 whatever may be his theory, every man, from the necessity 
 of his constitution, practically admits. 
 
 2. We always express the attributes of matter and the 
 energies of mind by terms generically dissimilar. The 
 qualities of matter we designate by adjectives, or termg 
 neaning something added to a substance, and wholly inca- 
 pable of an active signification. Thus, we say of a ma- 
 terial object, it is hard, soft, white, black, warm or cold. 
 On the other hand, we designate the energies of mind by 
 active verbs or participles, terms which indicate a power 
 residing in the substance itself. We say of mind, it thinks 
 remembers, wills, imagines ; or, that it is a thinking, will- 
 ing, remembering, imagining substance. This difference 
 in our mode of speech is not accidental, but of necessity. If 
 any one will make the experiment, he will find it impossible 
 to express his conceptions on these subjects in any other 
 manner. We are unable to conceive of thinking, reasoning, 
 remembering, as qualities, or of white, black, or color, as ener- 
 gies. We are so made that we are obliged to think of these 
 different attributes as at the farthest remove from each 
 Ither. 
 
 From these remarks we discover the limit which has be^ 
 9* 
 
18 intelle:)tual philosope 
 
 fixe! by our Creator to our investigations on these subjects 
 We perceive in the objects around us various qualities, and 
 we know that these qualities must be predicated of some- 
 thing, — for nothing, or that which does not exist, can have 
 no qualities, - -but what that something is we know not. Sc^ 
 again, we are conscious of the energies of mind, and we 
 know that these energies must be energies of something, 
 while of the essence of that something we are equally igno- 
 rant. Hence, in all our investigations respecting either 
 matter or mind, we must abandon at the outset all inquiries 
 respecting essences or absolute substance, and confine our- 
 selves to the observation of phenomena, their relations to 
 each other, and the laws to whicli they are subjected. The 
 progress of physical science within the last two centuries 
 has been greatly accelerated by the practical acknowledg- 
 ment of this law of investigation. Intellectual science can 
 advance in no other direction. 
 
 If, then, it be affirmed that the soul or the thinking prin- 
 ciple in man is material, or that its essence id the same as the 
 essence of matter, we answ-^r : 
 
 First, that the assertion is unphilosophical, inasmuch a3 
 it transgresses the limits which the Creator has fixed to 
 human inquiry. We have been endowed with no powers for 
 cognizing the essence of anything, and therefore we pass 
 beyond our legitimate province in affirming anything on the 
 subject. We can neither prove nor disprove it. We may 
 show that no evidence can be adduced in favor of it; that all 
 the analogies bearing on the su!)ject would lead to a different 
 conclusion ; and thus we may form the basis of an opinion 
 merely, but we can go no fuither. The nature of the case 
 excludes all positive knowledge. 
 
 Secondly, we reply that the asser'^ion is nugatory. It is 
 B-ffirmed that the essence of the soul is tho same as the 
 essence of matter. But what is ibe essence of matter ? We 
 
THE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. IP 
 
 ire obliged to confess that we do not know. "Whc-n, there- 
 fore, we assert that the essence of the soul is the same as 
 the essence jf matter, we merely assert that it is the same aa 
 something c f which, by confession, we know absolutely noth- 
 ing Were this assertion granted, it would then add nothing 
 whatever to the sum of human knowledge Would it not be 
 better frankly to confess our ignorance on the subject? 
 
 Thirdly, so far as the grounds for an opinion exist, they 
 favor precisely the opposite opinion. 
 
 The qualities of matter and the energies of mind are ag 
 widely as possible different from each other. In all lan- 
 guages they are designated by different classes of words 
 We recognize them by different powers of the mind, powers 
 which cannot be used interchangeably. Our senses cannot 
 recognize the thoughts of the mind, nor can consciousness 
 recognize the qualities of matter. To assert, then, that the 
 essence of mind and of matter is the same, is to assert, with- 
 out the possibility of proof, that two things are the same, 
 which not only have no attribute in common, but of which 
 the attributes are as unlike as we are able to conceive. 
 
 It may not be out of place to enumerate the several men- 
 tal states consequent upon the enunciation of any given 
 proposition. In the first place, the assertion is made with- 
 out any evidence either in favor of or against it. In thia 
 case (supposing the veracity of the assertor not to be taken 
 into view) my mind remains precisely as it was before. 
 The assertion goes for nothing. I have no opinion either 
 fhe one way or the other. I neither believe nor disbelieve, 
 nor have any tendency in either direction. In the second 
 case the assei tion is made, and though sufTicient proof is not 
 presented to create belief, yet considerations, as. for instance, 
 analogies, are shown to exist, which create a piobal)ility 
 either in favor of or against the thing asserted. Here, 
 tien, is ground for an opinion, and the state of mind it 
 
20 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 changed. We neither believe nor disbelieve, but yre hold 
 an opinion either in favor of, or contrary to the assertion. 
 In the third ca?e, the assertion is sustained either by syllo- 
 gistic reasoning, or by testimony conformed to the laws 
 of eviden^^e. Here a different state of mind is produced, 
 I believe it. I rely upon it as I would upon a matter which 
 came within the cognizance of my own perception or con- 
 sciousness. To illustrate these cases. A man asserts that 
 the moon is a mass of silver. His assertion leaves my 
 mind where it was before. I know nothing about it. 
 Another man asserts that the planet Jupiter is or is not 
 inhabited. He cannot prove it, but he presents various 
 analogical facts in harmony with this assertion. I form 
 an opinion on the subject. In the third case, a man asserts 
 that the sun is so many millions of miles from the earth, 
 and he proves, by testimony, that the observations forming 
 the data were made, and he explains the mathematical rea- 
 soning by which this result is obtained. I believe it, and 
 in my mind it takes its place with other established facts. 
 Any one, who will reflect upon the evidence presented in 
 favor of the materiality of the mind, can easily determine 
 which of these mental states it is entitled to produce. 
 
 But it has been sometimes said that the brain itself is the 
 mind, and that thought is one of its functions. The reason 
 given for this belief is, that diseases of the brain and nerves 
 affect the condition of the mind ; that the mind declines as 
 they become djbilitated by age, and that the mind becomes 
 deranged when the brain suffers from disease. 
 
 To this I would reply, that, so far as I have observed, 
 the facts are hardly stated with accuracy when this course 
 of argument ii adopted, and a large class of facts bearing 
 in an opposite direction is too frequently left out of view. 
 
 But, granting tlie facts, they do not justify the conclu- 
 sion that is drawn from them. Suppose the train to bf 
 
 ■■■■I 
 
THl;; PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. Zl 
 
 iiie instrument -which the mind uses in its intercourse with 
 the external world,— as, for instance, suppose the brain 
 to secrete the medium bj which the mind derives impres- 
 sions from without, and sends foith volitions from witliin.— 
 any derangement of this organ would, by necessity, create 
 dcranoff^ment in the forms of mental manifestation connected 
 with that derangement. Disease of the nerves may creato 
 false impressions, or may lead to acts at variance with the 
 spiritual volitions. As the facts may be thus accounted for 
 on the supposition that the brain is an organ used by tho 
 mind, as well as on the supposition that the brain is itself 
 the organ of thought, they leave the question precisely 
 where they found it. 
 
 If, then, it be asked, what is the relation which the mind 
 holds to the material body 7 our answer would be as follows : 
 The mind seems to be a spiritual essence, endowed with a 
 variety of capacities, and connected with the body by the 
 principle of life. These capacities are first called into 
 exercise by the organs of sense. So far as I can discover, 
 if a mind existed in a body incapable of receiving any im- 
 pression from without, it would never think, and would, of 
 course, be unconscious of its own existence. As soon 
 however, as it has been once awakened to action by impres- 
 sions from without, all its various faculties in succession ara 
 called into exercise. Consciousness, original suggestion, 
 memory, abstraction, and reason, begin at once to act. 
 These various powei-s are developed and cultivated by sub- 
 sequent e.xercise, until this congeries of capacities, once so 
 blank and negative, may at last be endowed with all the 
 eusrgies of a Newton or a Milton. 
 
 Locke compares the mind to a sheet of blank piper; 
 Professor TJphana, to a stringed instrument, which is silent 
 antil the hand'of the artist sweeps over its chords. Both 
 of these illustrations convey to us truth in respect to the 
 
22 rKTELLECTUAL PEIL0?OPHY. 
 
 relation existing bet\\ ^en the mind and the mate, ial system 
 wiiich it inhabits. The mind is possessed of no innate ideas ^ 
 its first ideas must come fiom \vithout. In this respect it 
 resembles a sheet of blank paper. In its present state it 
 call orijjinate no knowledge until called into action by im- 
 pressions made upon the senses. In this respect it resembles 
 a stringed instrument. Here, however, the resemblance 
 ceases. Were the paper capable not only of receiving the 
 form of the letters written upon it, but also of combining 
 them at will into a drama of Shakspeare or the epic of 
 Milton ; or, were the instrument capable not only of giving 
 forth a scale of notes when it was struck, but also of com- 
 bining them by its own power into the Messiah of Handel, 
 then would they both more nearly resemble the spiritual 
 essence which we call mind. It is in the power of com- 
 bining, generalizing, and reasoning, that the great diifer- 
 ences of mtellectual character consist. All men open their 
 eyes upon the same world, but all men do not look upon 
 the world to the same purpose. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Mind first called into action by the perceptive powers — Locke, Book 2, 
 chap. 1, sec. 9 ; chap. 9, sections 2 — i, and sec. 15. 
 
 — ^Qn the proper means of knowing the operations of our own minds — 
 Bcidj^ssay 1, ch:ip. 5. 
 "~No idea of subsunce or essence, material or spiritual — Locke, Book 2 
 th.ip. 23, sections 4, 5. 16, 30. 
 
 Energies of mind expressed by active verbs — Reid, Essay 1, chap^ 1. 
 
 Explanation of terms — Ibid. 
 
 Affirmation concerning the essence of mind unphilosophical — Stewart, 
 Introduction. 
 
 As much reason to believe in th» existence of spirit as of l>ody — Lock ft. 
 Book 2, chap, 23, secti ns 5, 15, 22, 30. 81. 
 
THE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES 28 
 
 BSCTIOS II, — OF THE PERCEPTIVE POWERS I>" GENEHAL 
 
 Before entering upon the consideration of the iudividua) 
 Boijses. it may be of use to oflfer a few suggestions respecting 
 the perceptive powers in general, i propose to do this in 
 the present section. 
 
 1. I find myself, in my present state, in intimate con- 
 nection with, what seems to me to be, an external world. I 
 cannot help believing that I am in my .study; that, looking 
 out of the wiuduw, I behold in one direction a thronged 
 city, in another green fields, and in the distance beyond a 
 range ot hills. I hear the sound of bells. I walk abroad 
 and am regaled with the odor of flowers. I see before me 
 fruit. I taste it and am refreshed. I am warmed by the 
 Bun and cooled by the breeze. 1 find that all other men in 
 a normal stitte are affected in the same manner. I conclude 
 that to be capable of being thus affected is an attribute of 
 human nature, and that the objects which thus affect me are, 
 like myself positive realities. 
 
 I cannot, then, escape the conviction that 1 am a conscious 
 existence, numerically distinct from every other created 
 being, and that I am surrounded by mateiial objects pos- 
 ses.sed of the qualities which I recognize. The earth and the 
 trees seem to me to exist, and I believe that they do exist. 
 The grass seems to me to be green, and I believe that it ia 
 green. I cannot divest myself of the belief that the world 
 (iround me actually is what I perceive it to be. I know that 
 jt is something absolutely distinct from the being whom I 
 call myself I am conscious that there is a we, an egc. I 
 peT-ceive that there is a not me. a non e^o. I observe that 
 nil men hive the Barae convictions, and that in all their 
 
2i INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHT 
 
 conversation and reasonings thej take these things fo! 
 granted. 
 
 2. I, Viowever, observe that my power of cognizing tie 
 existence and qualities of the objects around me is liinhed 
 There are but five classes of external qualities -which I am 
 able to discover ; these are odors, tastes, sounds, tactual, 
 and visible qualities. For the special purpose of cognizing 
 each of these qualities I find myself endowed with a partic- 
 ular organization, which is called a sense. These are the 
 senses of smell, taste, hearing, touch, and sight. Each 
 sense is limited to its own department of knowledge, and 
 has no connection with any other. We cannot see with our 
 ears, or hear with our fingers. Each sense performs its 
 own function, irrespective of any other. That matter has 
 no other qualities than those which we perceive, it is not 
 necessary to assert ; but if it have other qualities, inas- 
 much as we have no means of knowing them, we must 
 be forever, in our present state, ignorant of their existence. 
 
 This limitation, however, exists, not by necessity, but by 
 the ordinance of the Creator. He might, if he had so 
 pleased, have diminished the number of our senses. The 
 deaf and the blind are deprived of means of knowledge 
 which other men enjoy. The number of the senses in many 
 of the lower animals is exceedingly restricted. We might 
 possibly have been so constituted as to hold intercourse with 
 the world around us without the ir tervention of the senses. 
 We suppose superior beings to possess more perfect meang 
 of intelligence than ourselves ; but no one imagines them 
 to be endowed with material senses. Our Creator might, 
 probably, have increased the number of our senses, if he had 
 Been fit, and we should then have enjoyed other inlets to 
 Knowledge than those which we now possess. It is not im- 
 probable that some of the inferior animals possess senses of 
 fthich we are destitute. Migratory birds and fishes ari 
 
THE PERCEPTIVl. FACJLTIES. 26 
 
 endowed with a faculty by which, either by day Dr by night, 
 they pursue their way, with ineviuible certainty, through 
 the air or the ocean. May not this power be given them by 
 means of an additional sense ? 
 
 3. When our senses are brought into relation to their 
 aj'propriate objects, under normal conditions, a state of 
 mind is created which we call by the general name of 
 thought, or knowledge. If a harp is struck within a few 
 feet of me, a state of mind is produced which we call heax- 
 mg. So, if I open my eyes upon the external world, a 
 state of mind is produced which we call seeing. This men- 
 tal state is of two kinds. It is sometimes nothiiig more than 
 a simple knowledge, as when my sense of smelling is 
 excited by the perfume of a rose. At other times it goes 
 further than this, and we not only have a knowledge or 4 
 new consciousness, but also the belief that there exists some 
 external object by which this knowledge is produced. 
 
 The external conditions on which these changes depend 
 are as numerous as the senses themselves. Each sense has 
 probably its own media, or conditions, through which alone 
 its impressions are received. We see by means of the 
 medium of light. We hear by means of the vibrations of 
 air. 2sone of these media can be used interchangeably 
 Each medium is appropriated to its peculiar organ. 
 
 4. Physiologists have enabled us to trace with consider- 
 able accuracy several steps of the process by which the 
 intercoui^e between the spiritual intellect and the material 
 world is maintained ; by which impressions on our material 
 organization result in knowledge tnd the volitions of the 
 •oul manifest themselves in action. A brief reference to 
 our organization in this respect is here indispensable. 
 
 The nervous system in general is that part of our phys- 
 ical organization by which the mind holds intercourse with 
 the external world, and through which it obtains the ele- 
 
INTELLECTU/ L PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 menta of knowledge. The nervous system is, ho never, it 
 a two-fold character. A part of it is ei.iploycd in giving 
 energy to those processes by ■which life is sustained. These 
 have their appropriate centres either in the spinal marrow, 
 or in the different ganglia. Thus the heart, arteries ani 
 lungs, have their appropriate system of nerves, with the r 
 proper centre. The digestive apj,aratus has its own nervous 
 system. These are all parts of the general arrangement of 
 brain, spinal marrow and nerves, but their functions are 
 performed without volition or thought. Hence many of the 
 lower animals, which have no need of thought, have no other 
 nervous apparatus. The brain may be removed from some 
 of the cold-blooded animals without, for a considerable pe- 
 riod, producing death. In such cases sensation will pro- 
 duce motion, the arterial and digestive processes will con, 
 tinue for a while uninterrupted. Thus a common tortoise wil 
 live for several days after its head has been cut off Thus wo 
 also perform these various functions without an^ interven- 
 tion of the will. We digest our food, we breathe, our 
 hearts pulsate, without any care of our own ; and these 
 functions are performed as well when we sleep as when we 
 wake, — nay, they proceed frequently for a while with entire 
 regularity, when consciousness has been suspended by in- 
 jury of the brain. 
 
 As this part of the nervous system has nothing tc do with 
 thought and volition, we may dismiss it from our considera- 
 tion, and proceed to consider that other portion of it which 
 stands in so intimate connection with the thinking prin- 
 ciple. 
 
 The organism which we use for this purpose consists of 
 the brain and nerves. The part of the brain specially con- 
 cerned in thought is the outer portion, called the cerebrum. 
 From the brain proceed two classes of nerves, which have 
 «)een appropriately termed afferent and efferent. The affe* 
 
 kmmk^^^^^^ 
 
THE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. «i 
 
 (rent nerves connect the various organs of senae witt* th« 
 nrain. and thus convey to it impressions* from without. 
 When an image from an external object is formed on tht 
 retina of the eye, a change is produced along the course of 
 the optic nerve, which terminates in the brain, and the re- 
 sult is a change in the state of the mind which we call see- 
 ing. When the vibrations of the air fall upon the ear, 
 another change is produced on the auditory nerve which ig 
 continued until it reaches the brain, and the result is a 
 change in the state of the mind which we cili hearing. Tlie 
 other, or the efferent class of nerves, proceed from the brain 
 outwardly, and terminate in the muscles. By these the vo- 
 litions of the mind are conveyed to our material organs, 
 and the will of the mind is accomplished in action. The 
 process just now mentioned is here reversed. The volition 
 of the mind acts upon the brain, the change is communi- 
 cated through the nerves to the muscles, and terminates in 
 external action. Thus the brain is the physical centre ta 
 which all impressions producing knowledge tend, and from 
 which all volitions tending to action proceed. 
 
 Tlie proof of these truths is very simple. If the connec- 
 tion betwen the organ of sense and the brain be interrupted 
 by cutting, tying or injuring the nerve, perception imme' 
 diately ceases. If, in the same manner, the connection be- 
 tween the brain and the voluntary muscles be interrupted, 
 the limbs do not obey the will. Sometimes, by disease, the 
 nerves of feeling alone are paralyzed, and then, while the 
 power of voluntary motion remains, the patient loses en- 
 tirely the sense of touch, and will burn or scald himself 
 without consciousness of injury. At other times, while the 
 
 * I of course use the word impression here, in a general sensf , to convej 
 the idea of a change produced, and not of literal impression oi chanjse et 
 material torxL 
 
23 INTBLLECTLAL PlIILOSOi HY. 
 
 nei res of sencation are unaffected, the nerves of volition are 
 pai alyzed. In this case, feeling and the othor senses are un- 
 impaired, but the patient loses the power of locomotion. 
 Sonetimes an effect of this kind is produced by the mere 
 pressure upon a nerve. Sometimes, after sitting for a long 
 time in one position, on attempting to rise we have found 
 one of our feet "asleep." We had lost the power of mov- 
 ing it, and all sensation for the time had ceased. It seemed 
 more like a foreign body than a part of ourselves. Long- 
 continued pressure on the nerve had interrupted the com- 
 munication between the brain and the extremities of the 
 nerves. As soon as this communication was reestablished, 
 the limb resumed its ordinary functions* 
 
 These remarks respecting the nerves apply with somewhat 
 increased emphasis to the brain. If by injury to the skull 
 the brain becomes compressed, all intelligent connection be- 
 tween us and the external world ceases. So long as the 
 enuse remains unremoved, the patient in such a case con- 
 tinues in a state of entire unconsciousness. The powers of 
 volition and sensation are suspended. If the brain becomes 
 inflamed, all mental action becomes intensely painful, the 
 
 * Sometimes this communication is so entirely suspended that a limb in 
 this state, when touched by the other parts of the body, appears like a 
 foreign substance. An instance of this kind, which many years since oc- 
 carreJ to the author himself, may serve to illustrate this subject. He 
 awoke one night after a sound sleep, and was not agreeably surprised to 
 find a cold hand lying heavily on his breast. He was the sole occupant 
 of the room, and he knew not how any one could have entered it. It was 
 eo dai k that he could perceive nothing. He, however, kept hold of tne 
 hand, and, as it did not move, was somewhat relieved by tracing it up 
 to his own shoulder He had lain in an awkward position, so that ha 
 had pressed upon the nerve until all sensation had ceased. Probably 
 many stories of fipparitions and nightly visitations may be accounted foi 
 by supposing a simiKr cause. 
 
XBK PI ICEPTlVfi FACULTIES. 2!» 
 
 perceptions are false or exaggerated, and the volitions aa- 
 Bume the violence of frenzy.* 
 
 It may illustrate the relation which the nervous system 
 sustains to the other parts of our material structure, to 
 suppose the brain, nerves and organs of sense separated 
 from the rest of the body, and to exist by themselves, with- 
 out loss of life. In such a case, all our intellectual con- 
 nections with the external world could be maintained. Wo 
 could see, and hear, and feel, and taste, and smell, and re- 
 member, and imagine, and reason. All that we should lose 
 would be the power of voluntary motion, and the con- 
 veniences which result from it. If, then, we should put 
 this nervous system into connection with the bones, muscles, 
 and those viscera which are necessary for their sustentation, 
 we should have our present organization just as we actually 
 find it. We see, then, that the other parts of our system 
 are not necessary to our power of knowing, but mainly to 
 our power of acting. 
 
 5. Of sensation and perception. 
 
 I have said that when our senses, under normal condi 
 lions, are brought into relation to the objects around us. 
 the result is a state or act of the mind which we call know- 
 ng. A new idea or a new knowledge is given to the mind. 
 This knowledge is of two kinds. In one case it is a simple 
 
 * Sometimes, however, astonishing lesions of the brain occur without 
 ither causing dest-ruction of life or even any permanent injury. A case 
 ras a few years since publishfl in the daily papers, under the authorifj 
 if several eminent physicians, more remarkable than any with which I 
 iwi bsen previously acquainted. A man was engngcl in blasting rocks 
 knd as he stood over his work, and was, I think, drawing the priming 
 irii«, the charge exploded, and drove thi-ough his head an iron rod of some 
 wo or three feet in length. The rod came out through the top of hij 
 lead, ami w:is found oovercd with blood and bra'n Re nevertheleai 
 iralked home without assistance, and under ordinary mcdioal care reuov^ 
 •red in a few wceka 
 
 3* 
 
80 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 knowledge, connected with no external thing. Thus, suj> 
 pose that I had never yet received any impression from tha 
 external world. In profound darkness a rose is brought 
 near to me. I ara at once conscious of a new state of mind. 
 I have a knowledge, something which I can reflect upon, 
 which we call smell This knowledge, however, exists solely 
 in my mind. I refer it to nothing, for I know nothing to 
 whicli I can refer it. This simplest form of knowledge ia 
 called sensation. 
 
 But there is another form of knowledge given us through 
 the medium of our senses. In some cases we not only ob- 
 tain a new idea, or a knowledge of a quality, but we know, 
 ako, that this quality is predicated of _sorae object existing 
 without us. We know that there is a 7iot mcy and that thia 
 is one of its attributes. Suppose, as in tlie other case, I 
 am endowed with the sense of sight, and in daylight the 
 rose is placed before me. I know that there is an ex- 
 ternal object numerically distinct from myself, and that it 
 is endowed with a particular form and color. This act is 
 called jwrception. 
 
 These two forms of knowledge are united in the sense of 
 touch, and may be clearly distinguished by a little reflec- 
 tion. The illustration of Dr. Reid is as follows : " If a man 
 runs his head with violence against a pillar, the attention of 
 the mind is turned entirely to the painful feeling, and, to 
 speak in common language, he feels nothing in the stone, 
 but he feels a violent pain in his head." " When he leans 
 his head gently against the pillar, he will tell you he 
 feels nothing in his head, but feels hardness in the 
 slone ' — Reid's Inquiry, chap. 5, sec. 2. So I prick 
 4 person with the point of a needle ; a new knowledge ia 
 neated in his mind, which he denominates pain. I draw 
 the needle lightly over his finger, and I ask him what it is ; 
 he replies, the point of a needle. So, if I place my f rger» 
 
TUE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. 81 
 
 dglitlj on a table with my attention strongly directei tc tha 
 feeling. I am conscious of a sensation. If I move my hand 
 slowly over the tivhle in order to ascertain its qualities, I am 
 conscious of a perception ; that is, of a knowledge that the 
 table is smooth, hard, cold, etc. The smell of a rose, the 
 feeling of cold, the pain of the tcjthache. are sensations 
 The knowledge of hardness, of fo' m, of a tree, or a house, 
 arc perceptions. 
 
 It has been commonly suppo ed that every perceptioii 
 was preceded by and consequent upon a sensation. Hence 
 the question has frequently arisen, since the perception ia 
 predicated upon the sensation, and the sensation conveys to 
 us no knowledge of an external world, whence is our knowl- 
 edge of an external world derived ? From these data it has 
 seemed difficult to answer the question satisflictorily. Dr. 
 P»rown has attempted to solve the difficulty by supposing 
 the existence of a sixth sense, which he calls the sense of 
 muscular resistance. He suggests that the pressure of the 
 hand against a solid body produces a peculiar sensation in 
 the muscles by which we become cognizant of the existence 
 of an external world. To me this explanation is unsatisfac- 
 tory. The question is, how does sensation, which is a mere 
 feeling, and gives us no knowledge of the external, or the 
 not me, become the cause of perception, which is a knowl- 
 edge of the external ] Dr. Brown attempts to remove the 
 difficulty by suggesting another sensation, which, being a. 
 mere sensation also, has no more necessary connection with 
 tlic knowledge of the external than any other. 
 
 It is my belief that the idea of externality, that is, of 
 objects numerically distinct from ourselves, is given to mm 
 spontaneously by the senses of touch and sight. When "i^e 
 feel a hard substance, the notion that it is something exter- 
 nal to us is a part of the knowledge which at once ari.ses in 
 the nind When I look upon a tree I camiot divest my* 
 
82 INTELLECTCAi. PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 self of the instantaneous belief that the tree and myself xu 
 distinct existences, and that ; t is such as I perceive it to be. 
 Unless this knowledge were thus given to us hj the consti- 
 tution of our minds, I know not how we should ever arrive 
 at it. That this view of the subject is correct, is, I think, 
 evident from what we observe of the conduct of the youn^ 
 of all animals. The lamb, or the calf, of a few hours old; 
 seems bj sight to have formed as distinct conceptions of ex- 
 ternality, of qualities, of position, and of distance, as it ever 
 obtains. We cannot suppose that its knowledge arises from 
 any sense of muscular resistance, but must believe that it 
 is given to it originally with the sense of sight. So an in- 
 fant turns to the light, grasps after a candle, just as it does 
 after any visibb object in later life. I therefore believe that 
 this complex knowledge is given to us by the senses of sight 
 and touch, just as the simpler knowledge is given to us by 
 the senses of smell and taste. 
 
 REFEREXCES. 
 
 Perception in general — ^Reid's Inquiry, chap. 6, sec. 20. 
 Process of nature in perception — Reid's Inquiry, chcp. 6, sec. 21. 
 Mode of perception — Essays on Intellectual Powers, Essay 2, chap. 1. 
 Perception limited by the senses — Essay 2, chap. 2. 
 The evidence of perception to be relied on — Essay 2, chap. 5. 
 Sensation and perception — Abercrombie's Intellectual Powers, Part 2. 
 lec. 1. 
 
 8BCTI0N in. — OF THE MODE OF OUR INTERCOURSE WITH 
 THE EXTER¥AL WORLD. 
 
 Tn^ the prccediiig sections we have treated of both tha 
 physical and spiritual facts concerned in the act of perccp 
 tion. We have seen diat in order to the existence of per 
 ceptioa, some change must be produced in the organ of 
 
THE l-ERCEPrrVB FACULT1S3, 8l 
 
 gcnae , this must give rise to a change transmitted bj th« 
 nerves to the brain, and the brain must be in a normal stat« 
 in order to be affected by the change communicated by the 
 nerves. If either of these conditions be viohited, neither 
 sensation nor perception can exist. When, however, these 
 organs are all in a normal state, and its appropriate object 
 10 presented to an organ of sense, the result is a knowledge 
 or an affection of the spiritual soul. The first part of the 
 process is material — it consists of changes in matter; the last 
 part is thought, an affection of the immaterial spirit. The 
 question is, how can any change in matter produce thought, 
 or knowledge, an affection of the spirit ] Or, still more, 
 how C4in this modification of the matter of the brain produce 
 in us a knowledge of the external world, its qualities and 
 relations 1 The lighting of effluvia on my olfactory nerve 
 IS in no respect like the state of my mind which I call the 
 sensation of smell. The vibrations of the tympanum, or 
 the undulations of the auditory nerve, are in no respect 
 similar to the state of my mind when I hear an oratorio of 
 Handel. The two events are as unlike to each other ah 
 any that can be conceived. In what manner, then, does the 
 one event become the cause of the other 1 
 
 A variety of answers has been given to these questions. 
 The manner in which the subject has been formerly treated 
 is sulistantially as follows : It was taken for granted that 
 the mind was a spiritual essence, whose seat was the brain ; 
 that the mind could only act or be acted upon in the place 
 where it actually resided, and that, as external objects were 
 at a distance from the mind, it was necessary for images of 
 external objects to be present to it, in order that it might 
 obtiiin a knowledge of their existence. 
 
 Hence arose the doctrine of what has been called repre- 
 sentative images. By some of the ancient philosophers it 
 was supposed that forms or species )f external objectft 
 
34 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 enter '-1 the organs of sense, and through them becam« 
 present to the mind, i!; was the opinion of Locke, so fa? 
 as I can understand him, that, in every act of perception, 
 there is an intermediate image of the external object pres- 
 ent to the mind, -which the mind cognizes immediately, in- 
 stead of the object itself. I am aware tha' the language of 
 Locke is, on this subject, exceedingly unceitain and ambig- 
 uous. Sometimes he seems to use the word idea to express 
 merely an act of the mind, and, at other times, something 
 present to the mind, but numericallj-- distinct from it. which 
 is the immediate object of knowledge. That, however, he 
 really believed that in perception there must exist something, 
 a positive entity, different both from the mind and its per- 
 ceptive act, is evident from such passages as the following : 
 '• There are some ideas which have admittance only 
 through one sense which is peculiarly adapted to receive 
 them." — " And if these organs, or the nerves which are the 
 conduits to convey them from without to their audience in 
 the brain, the mind's presence-room (as I may so call it), 
 ai-e any of them so disordered as not to perform their func- 
 tions, they have no postern to be admitted by, no other way 
 to bring themselves into view and be perceived by the un- 
 derstanding." — Book IL, chap, 3, sec. 1. 
 
 Again: " If these external objects be not united to our 
 minds Avhen they produce ideas therein, and yet we perceive 
 their original qualities in such of them as singly fall under 
 our senses, it is evident that some motion must be thence 
 continued by our nerves or animal spirits, by some parts of 
 our botlies. to the brain or seat of sensation, there to produce 
 the particular ideas we have of them. And since the ex- 
 tension, figure, number and motion, of bodies of an observa- 
 ble bigness, may be perceived at a distance by sight, it la 
 evid(;nt some singly imperceptible bodies mnst cotiie from 
 them to the eyes, and thereby convey to the brain aom« 
 
 Hij 
 
THE PERCEPTIVE FACILTIES. 35 
 
 ffiDtion which produces these ideas which we have of them.' 
 — Book II., chap. 8, sec. 12. 
 
 Again : '• I pretend not to teach, but to inquire, and thero 
 fore cannot bat coufi-.ss here, again, that external and interna, 
 sensation arc the only p;>..ssages that I can find of knowledge to 
 the understanding. These alone, as far as I can discover, 
 are the windows by A\hich light is let into this dark room; 
 for, raethinks, the undtrstantling is not much unlike a closet 
 wholly shut from the lislit, with some little opening left to 
 let in external visible resemhlances or ideas of things 
 xnthout. Would the pictures coming into such a dark 
 loom but stay there and lie orderly, so as to be found upon 
 occasion, it would very much resemble the understanding of 
 a man in reference to all objects of sight and the ideas of 
 them." — Bwk ii., chap. 2, sec. 17. 
 
 From these quotations, — and many of the same kind might 
 be adde<l, — two things are evident : first, that Locke used 
 the word idea to designate both the act of the mind in per- 
 ception, a mere spiritual affection; and also something pro- 
 cee^liiig from the external object Avhich was the cause of thia 
 state. Secondly, that he did really recognize this interme- 
 diate something as a positive entity which the soul cognizea 
 instead of the outward object. He speaks of the nerves as 
 the conduits to convey these id'ias to their presence- 
 chamber, the brain ; of imperceptible bodies which must 
 come from them (external objects) to the eyes, and be 
 conveyed to the brain. These expressions are too definite 
 to l)e used figumtively, and we must, therefore, accept thig 
 exfilanation of the phenomena as a statement of the belief 
 of our illustrious author. This belief, however, was by no 
 means peculiar to him. It was a common belief at the time, 
 and he always refers to it as a matter well understood, and 
 received without question, by his cotemporaries. The stu- 
 dent who wishes to pursue this subject farther, will read 
 
Rb TNTELLE^TUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 with pleasure the passages referred to at the clase of Iha 
 chapter. 
 
 The belief, then, prevalent at the time of Locke, may be 
 stated briefly thus : The soul is located in the brain. It 
 can cognize nothing except -sphere it exists in space. Exter- 
 nal objects, being separated from it, can never be the imme- 
 diate objects of its perception. There must, therefore, pro 
 ceed from the external object to the mind some images oi 
 forms, which, entering by the senses, become present to the 
 mind, and are there the objects of perception. Hence the 
 mind never cognizes external objects ; this is, from the na- 
 tm-e of the case, impossible. It only cognizes these images 
 m the brain, and, from their resemblance to external objects, 
 it learns the existence and qualities of the external world. 
 
 Dr. Reid for a while believed this doctrine, but, startled 
 at the conclusions to which it led, was induced to examine 
 the foundations on which it rested. Upon reflection, he 
 soon arrived at the following conclusions : 
 
 1st. The existence of these images is inconceivable. We 
 can conceive of the image of a form, but how can we con- 
 ceive of the image of a color as existing in absolute d.irk- 
 ness ; and still more of the image of a smell, a soand, or a 
 taste ? Or how can we conceive of distinct images vtf all of 
 these various qualities forming the conception of a single 
 object ? 
 
 2d. Were this theory conceivable, it is wholly destHute 
 of proof. It is merely the conception of a philosopher's 
 brain. Who ever saw such images ? Who, by his own 
 consciousness, was ever aware of their existence 1 What 
 shadow of proof of their existence was ever given to the 
 world '^ Are we, then, called upon to believe an ijiconceiva- 
 ble hypothesis on no other evidence than merely the asser- 
 tion of philosophers 7 
 
 8d. Viere the existence of intermediate images proved, it 
 
 lilliiiiiHHiiili 
 
THE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. 31 
 
 would relieve the subject of no essential diflficultj. It might 
 reasonaUy bj d'^roanded, is it easier to cognize a small 
 object than a large one ? If the image be matter, then the 
 question still remains unanswered, how does a change of 
 matter cre;ite thought, an affection of the soul ? Is the im- 
 age spirit ] Then it cannot resemble the external object, and 
 can give us no notion of its qualities. And. more than all, 
 if re never cognize the object, but only the image, how can 
 W'j have any knowledge whatever either of the external 
 ooject or of its qualities 7 
 
 The suggestion of these considerations abolished at once 
 the doctrine of a represenUitive image. Since the time of Dr. 
 Reid. it has, I think, been conceded, by the most judicious 
 writers on this subject, that we know nothing concerning the 
 mode of perception beyond a statement of the facts. There 
 is a series of physical facts which can be proved by experi- 
 ment to exist. When these terminate there arise knowl- 
 edges of two kinds : the one a simple knowledge, as when I 
 am conscious of a smell or a sound ; the other a compound 
 knowledge, embracing a simple idea, as of color or form, 
 and also an idea of an external object of which these quali- 
 ties are predicated. Both of these are pure and ultimate 
 cognitions. We are as perfectly convinced of the truth of 
 the oue as of the other. I as fully believe that I see a 
 rose, that its leaves are green and its petals red. as that I 
 Bmell an odor which I have learned to call the smell of a 
 rose. I cognize no image, I cognize the rose itself: and I 
 am as sure of its existence as I am of my own. Such seems 
 to be the law of perception under which I have been created. 
 I can neither change these perceptions, nor help relying with 
 r)erfect confidence on the truths which they reveal to me, 
 if I am asked to explain it any farther, I confess myseli 
 'mable t) do so. If investigation shall enable us to establish 
 any additional iacts in the aeries by which th^ material 
 4 
 
S8 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPL.Y. 
 
 change terminates in thought, vre will accept its discoveni 
 with thankfulness. Until this is done, it is far bettor, whoii 
 we have reached the utmost limit of our knowledge, humbly 
 to confess our ignorance of all that is beyond. 
 
 The doctrine of a representative image would not, at +he 
 present day, deserve even a passing notice, were it not foi 
 the consequences which were deduced from it. Some of 
 these are worthy of remark. 
 
 In the first place, it was difficult to conceive how the soul 
 could be affected and thought produced by any change in 
 matter. It was supposed that this difficulty could be re- 
 lieved by the hypothesis of representative images. But 
 then it was demanded, are these images matter or spirit 1 
 If they are matter, and matter cannot act but upon matter, 
 since they act on the mind, the mind must be matter. Hence 
 was deduued the doctrine of materialism. Or, on the other 
 hand, are dicse images spirit 1 In this case, spirit might 
 act upon spiiit; but then how could spiritual images proceed 
 from matter, dixd, more still, how could they resemble mat- 
 ter? If, then, we cognize nothing but these, whence is 
 the evidence of any material world ] Hence the doctrine 
 of idealism. 
 
 But again. It is granted in this hypothesis that we can 
 cognize in itself nothing external. We cognize nothing but 
 images, and it is impossible for us to cognize anything else. 
 But it was apparent that no images, which could by possi- 
 bility pass through the nerves, could resemble external qual- 
 ities ; what reason, then, have we to believe that the exU^rnal 
 quality is, in any respect, like the image which alone we 
 are able to contemplate 7 Again : in order to know that the 
 images are similar to the objects which they represent, we 
 must know both the ol)ject and its representative. But by 
 necessity we can know only the one , how can we affirm tha< 
 \t resembles the other 7 If I enter a gallery of painting 
 
 ■HH 
 
THE PERCEPTIVE FACULTIES. 39 
 
 kow can 1 determine whether the pictures are likenesses oi 
 are mere productions of the fancy; if neither I nor any other 
 man had ever seen any originals of whicli tliey could be the 
 resemblances? Hence it is manifest that the evidence of the 
 existence of a material world, or jf anything existing out 
 of the mind, is at once swept away. Reasoning in thia 
 manner, Bishop Berkeley arrived at idealism. He denied the 
 existence of an external world, and concluded that notliing 
 existed but spirit and the aflfections of spirit. 
 
 But this idea was generalized. It was admitted that we 
 could not cognize external objects directly, but only through 
 the medium of representative images. If this is true of 
 material, why is it not true of spiritual objects, — of the 
 cognitions of consciousness 7 Why do we not cognize them 
 by means of representations 7 But if we cognize them 
 thus, and have no cognition of the objects themselves, how 
 do wc know that there is any such existence as mind or its 
 faculties 7 In short, how do we know that anything exists 
 but ideas and impressions 7 Ho^s do we know that any such 
 realities exist as time, space, eternity. Deity 7 All is re- 
 solved into a succession of ideas, wliich follow each other by 
 the laws of association, and besides these there is notliing in 
 the universe. This is nihilism, and such consequences were 
 actually deduced by some philosophers from this doctrine. 
 It was surely important to examine tlie evidences of an hy- 
 pothesis which led to such results. 
 
 This imperfect fragment of the history of intellectual 
 philosophy is not without its value. It teaches us the vast 
 superiority of the acknowledgment of ignorance, to the gratu- 
 itous assumption of knowledge. When we have reached iLo 
 limits of our knowledge, there is no harm in confessing that 
 beyond this we do not know. But to look out into the 
 iarkness, and dogmatically to affiim what exists beyond the 
 r3ach of our vision, may exclude invaluabl-^ truth, and in- 
 
to INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 troJuce the aiost alarming error. Thus, in the present in 
 stance, a hypothetical explanation of a fact, which in oui 
 present state does not seem to admit of explanation when 
 carried out to its legitimate results was found to terminata 
 in universal scepticism, and furD'sh a foundation for consis- 
 tent atheism. Philosophy will certainly have made impor- 
 tant progress when it shall have been able accurately to 
 determine the limits of human inquiry. 
 
 REFEREN CE S. 
 
 Representative images — Loose, Book 2, chap. 3, sec. 1 ; chap. 8, sec 
 12 ; chap 11, sec. 17. Raid's Inquiry, chap. 1, sees. 3 — 7; 2d Essay, 
 chaps. 4, 7, 9, li. Stewart, toI. 1, chap. 1, sec. 3. Introduction, Pari 
 1, vol 2 chap. 4, sec. 1 ; chap. 1, sec. 3. Cousin, Psychology, chaps. 6 
 and 7. 
 
 Kuowleage an agreement between the idea and object — Lockfc Book 4, 
 chap. l,sec. 2 ; chap. 4, sec. 3. Cousin, chap. 6. 
 
 Consciousness an authority — Chapter 1. 
 
 Three things existent in perception — Reid, 2d Eeaay, chap. 5. 
 
 Idealise and Nihilism — CoTuin, ehap 6, laet psut, and chap 7 BaU 
 V Easoy, shaps. 10—12. 
 
Thl INDIVIDUAI SENSES SEI ARATELT CONSIDERED 
 
 8ECTI02S IV. — OP THE SENSE OF SMELL. 
 
 Having, in the preceding chapter, treated of our percep- 
 tive powers in general, I proceed to describe the particulai 
 senses with which we have been endowed. Proceeding from 
 the simpler to the more complex, I shall examine, in order, 
 smell, taste, hearing, toucQ and sight. 
 
 The organ of smell is situated in the back part of the 
 nostrils. It is composed of thin laminae of bone, folded 
 together like a slip of parchment, over which the olfactory 
 nerve is spread, covered by the ordinary mucous membrane 
 which lines the mouth and posterior fiiuces. It is so situ- 
 ated that the whole surface of the organ is exposed to the 
 current of air in the act of inspiration. 
 
 In those animals which seek their prey by scent, this or- 
 gan is found larger, exposing a greater amount of surface 
 to the air, than in those which pursue their prey by sight 
 The perfection in which this sense is enjoyed by some of the 
 lower animals has always been a subject of remark. A 
 d>g will track the footsteps of his master througli the streeta 
 cf a crowded city, and, after a long absence, will recognize 
 him by smell as readily as by sight or hearing. 
 
 When we are brought near to an odoriferous body, we 
 immediat.dy become sensible of a knowledge, a feeling, or a 
 
*- INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 partj.ular s>tate of mind. If a tuberose is brought ncr a 
 person who has never amelled it, he is at once conscious of 
 a form of knowledge entirely new to him. If we do not 
 by our other senses, know the cause of the sensation, we 
 havo no name for it, but are obliged to designate it by re- 
 firring to the place where we experienced it. If, by our 
 other senses, we have learned the cause of the sensation, we 
 designate it by the name of the object which produces it. 
 Were the perfume of a rose present to me for the first 
 time, and did I not see the flower, I could give to it no name. 
 As soon as I have ascertained that the perfume proceeds 
 from the rose. I call it the smell of a rose. We thus set 
 cle;!) ly that from this sense we derive nothing but a sensation, 
 ii simple knowledge, which neither gives us a cognition of 
 inylhing external, nor teaches us that anything exists out 
 )f ourselves. 
 
 The exercise of this sensation is either agreeable, indif- 
 ferent or disagreeable. The perfume of flowers, fruit, aro- 
 matic herbs, &c., is commordy pleasant. The odor of ob 
 jeets in common use is generally indifferent. The odor ot 
 putrid matter, either animal or vegetable, is excessively dis- 
 agreeable. In general, it may be remarked that substances 
 wiiich are healthful for food are agreeable to the smell; 
 while those which are deleterious are unpleasant. The 
 final cause of this general law is evident, ami the reason 
 why the organ of smell in all animals is placed directly over 
 the mouth. Odors of all kinds, however, if they be long 
 continued, lose their power of affecting us. We soon 
 become insensible to the perfume of the flowers of a garden ; 
 and men, whose vociiion requires them to labor in the midst 
 of carrion after a short time become insensible to the offen 
 sive efiluvia by which they are surrounded. 
 
 Pleasant odors are refreshing and invigorating, and re- 
 store, for the time, tye exhausted nervous energy. Offen* 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SENSES. J3 
 
 pvc odcr.x, OQ the other hand, are depressing to the spirits. 
 and tenv\ to gkom and despondency. The former of thes* 
 effects is alhided to with great beauty in the wcii-kucwu 
 hues \.i Milt/jn 
 
 " As when to them who sail 
 Beyond the Cape of Hope, and now are past 
 Mozambique ; off at sea, north-east winds blow 
 Sabean c-djrs fi'om the spicy shore 
 Of Araby the blest ; with such delay 
 Well pleased, they slack their course, and many a league, 
 Cheered with the grateful smell, old Ocean smiles." 
 
 Paradise Lost, Book 4, lines 159 — 1G5, 
 
 Concerning the manner in which this sensation is pro- 
 duced, I believe that but one hypothesis has been suggested. 
 The received opinion is that what is called effluvia, or ex- 
 tremely minute particles, are given off by the odorous body, 
 that these are dissolved in the air, and brought in contact 
 with the organ of this sense in the act of breathing. That 
 this may be so is quite probable. It is, however, destitute 
 of direct proof, and is liable to many objections. It is dif- 
 Bcult to conceive how a single grain of musk can, for a long 
 time, fill the area of a large room with ever so minute par- 
 ticles, without visible diminution of either volume or weight 
 Until, however, some better theory shall be presentetl, we 
 seem justified in receiving that which even imperfectly ac- 
 counts for the facts in the case. Still, we are to remember 
 that it is merely a hypothesis, to be abandoned as soon as 
 xny better explanation is established by observation. 
 
 From what has been already remarked, it must be, I 
 think, e\ndent that the sense of smell g.ves us no percep- 
 tion. It is the source of a simple knowledge which alone 
 would never lead us out of ourselves. This sensjition clearly 
 gives us no notion whatever of the i^uality wliich prjdaces 
 
14 INTELLfiUTUAL PHILOSOPHY 
 
 It, noi have philosophers ever been able to determine whal 
 that quality is. It is possible that the suggestion of causa 
 and eifect might indicate to us the probability of a cause 
 but the sense itself would neither awaken this inquiry noi 
 furnish us with the means of answering it. 
 
 Does the sense of smell furnish us with any conctption 1 
 By conception, I mean a notion of a thing, such as will 
 enable us, when the object itself is absent, to make it a 
 distinct object of thought. Thus I have seen a lily ; I can 
 form a distinct notion of its form and color, and I can com- 
 pare it with a rose, and from my conceptions point out the 
 diflFerence between them. I could describe this lily, from 
 my conception of it, so that another person could have the 
 same notion of it as myself Were I a painter, I could ex- 
 press my conception on canvas. Now, is there a similar 
 power of forming a conception of a smell I Can I form a 
 distinct notion of the smell of an apple or a peach, and can 
 1 compare them together, or describe them by language, or 
 in any other manner transfer my conception to another 7 
 So far as I can discover, from observing the operation of 
 my own mind, all this is impossible. After having smelled 
 an odorous body, I know that I should be able to recognize 
 that particular odor again. I cannot form a conception of 
 the smell of a rose, but I know that I could, if it were 
 present, immediately recognize it and distinguish it froji all 
 other odors. Beyond this I am conscious of no power 
 whatever. 
 
 This, however, I am aware, is but the experience of a 
 guigle individual. Other persons may be more richly en- 
 dowed than myself I have frequently put this question to 
 the classes which I have instructed, and I find the testimony 
 not altogether uniform. Some few young gentlemen in every 
 class have assured me that they had as definite a conception 
 of a smell a? they had of a color or a form. The greater 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SEXSE3. 45 
 
 p&ft, however, have agreed with me that they had no power 
 to form the conception in question. 
 
 It has very probal)ly, occurred to the reader that tho 
 words, "the smell of a rose," convey two entirely diScvent 
 meanings ; th<> one objective, the other subjective. The 
 "smell of a rose" may designate a peculiar feeling or 
 knowledge existing in my mind, or it may designate the un- 
 known cause of that feeling. Thus, when I say the smell 
 of a rose is sometimes followed by fainting, I mean the sen- 
 sation produced in the mind. I say the apartment is filled 
 with the smell of a rose. I here mean the unknown quality 
 existing in the rose. Both of these expressions I suppose 
 to be correct, and in harmony with the idiom of the Eng- 
 lish language. The same ambiguity exists in all the terms 
 commonly used to designate sensations. Thus, the taste ot 
 an apple, heat, cold, sweet, sour, and many others, admit of 
 a similar twofold signification. 
 
 Chemical philosophers, aware of this ambiguity in lan- 
 guage, have wisely intixxluced a new term, by which, in a 
 particular case, this difficulty may be obviated. Observing 
 that the term " heat " may signify a certain feeling in my 
 mind, as well as the unknown cause of that feeling existing 
 m a burning body, and as they were continually treating 
 of the one, and almost never of the other, they have desig- 
 nated the two ideas by different words. Retaining the terra 
 heat to signify the sensation of a sentient being, they use 
 the word "calorie " to designate the unknown cause of the 
 Ben«ition. Every one must perceive how much definitenesa 
 tlie use of this term has add^d to this branch of philosoph 
 kal inquiry. 
 
 REFERENCE. 
 Beid's luqi iry, chapter 2, the whole chaptm. 
 
46 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOl ttr. 
 
 SECTION V. — THE SENSE OF TASIB. 
 
 The nerves of taste are spread over the tongue and thd 
 back part of the fauces. They terminate in numeious 
 papiUfB, or small excrescences, which form together the or- 
 gan of taste. It is almost needless to observe that the 
 nerves are everywhere covered with tiie mencbrane lining 
 the mouth, and never come in immediate conaict with the 
 sapid substance. These papillae are most ni.merous on the 
 tip, the edges, and the root of the tongue, leaving many 
 portions of the intermediate surface almost destitute of thia 
 sensation. 
 
 The sense of taste is never excited except by solutions. 
 The saliva, which is copiously furnished by the glands of the 
 mouth, is an active solvent. By mastication, the solid food 
 becomes intimately mixed with tiiis animal fluid, is partially 
 dissolved by it, and, in this condition, is brought into rela- 
 tion to the papillae which constitute the organ of taste. 
 Insoluble substances are, therefore, tasteless. When the 
 pnpilh« of the tongue either become dry, or are covered 
 with the thick coating produced by fever, taste becomes im- 
 perfect or is wholly suspended. 
 
 When a sapid body, under normal circumstances, ia 
 brought into relation with the organ of taste, a sensation either 
 pleasing or displeasing immediately ensues. When the sen- 
 sation is pleasant, we are instinctively impelled to swallow, 
 and with the act of swallowing the sensation is perfected 
 and ceases. When the sensation is unpleasant, we are, on 
 the other hand, impelled to reject whatever may be the cause 
 of it, and frequently it requires a strong effort of the will 
 to control this impulse. The sensation of taste is not con 
 Bummated without the act of swa'lowing. It would seem 
 
 mHiiil 
 
THE u:dividual senses. 47 
 
 probable that the anterior and posterior nerves of the tongue 
 ^ere designed to perform different offices, the former giv- 
 ing us an imperfect sensation, which creates the disposition 
 el*:her to swallow or to reject the sapid substance; the latter 
 awakening the perfected sensation as the substance passea 
 over it. 
 
 As in the case of smell, so in that of taste, I think that 
 «ith the sensation no perception is connected. A particular 
 aeniibility is excited ; a feeling either pleasant or unpleasant 
 18 created : a simple knowledge is given us ; — but no cog- 
 nition of anything external can be observed. Whatever 
 notions of externality come to us, by means of this sense, 
 are derived from otlier sources than the sense itself. Thus, 
 we can receive nothing into tiie mouth except by bring- 
 inc it into contact with the lips. The sense of touch 
 then cognizes it as something external to ourselves. The 
 suggestion of cause and effect might lead us possibly to tlu 
 same conclusion. These, however, are no parts of the sense 
 of taste. The taste in the mouth which frequently accom- 
 panies disease, awakens no idea of anything external. 
 Wlien, however, by means of our other senses, we have 
 learned that a particular flavor is produced by any sub- 
 stance, we associate the flavor with the substance, and ojve 
 it a name accordingly. We thus speak of the taste of an 
 apple, a pear, or a peach. 
 
 So far as I am able to discover, the remarks made in the 
 last section, respecting conception as derived from smell, 
 apply with equal truth to the sense of taste. I think that 
 men generally have no distinct conception of an absent t;iste, 
 but only a conviction that they should easily recognize it if 
 it were again presented to them. This form of recollection 
 may be so strong as to create a longing for a particular fla- 
 vor, but still there is no conception like that produced hi 
 either sigh\, or touch. 
 
m INTELLKCTUAl, PHlLOSOPmr. 
 
 The same ambiguity may be observed here aa in tbi. 
 analogous sense. The taste of an apple, means bjth the 
 quality in the fruit which produces the sensation and the 
 affection of the sentient being produced by it. The one ia 
 ol)jective, belonging exclusively to the tion ego; the other is 
 sutjoctive, belonging wholly to the 'go. Of the sensation 
 wc have a very definite knowledge ; it can be nothing but 
 what we feel it to be. Of the cause we are, as in the sense 
 of smell, wholly ignorant. 
 
 Tlie number of sensations derived from taste is, I think, 
 much greater than that derived from smell. An epicure 
 becomes capable of multiplying them, and distinguishing 
 them from each other to a very great extent. We are able, 
 also, to classify our sensations of taste much more definitely 
 than those oi smell. Thus, we speak of acid, subacid, 
 8weet, bitter, astringent, and many other classes of tastes, to 
 which we refer a large number of individuals. In this 
 manner we designate various kinds of fruit, medicines, &c. 
 While, therefore, these two senses seem to be governed 
 by the same general laws, I think that in man the knowl- 
 edge derived from taste is more definite and more varied 
 than the other. By means of the sense of touch, which so 
 completely surrounds the sense of taste, we should, in the 
 use of it. also arrive at the idea of externality. In this 
 respect it is indirectly the source of knowledge which is not 
 given us by the sense of smell. In blind mutes, however, 
 to whom the sense of smell becomes much more importjmt, 
 in all probability the case is reversed, and smell furnishes 
 u^}re nun.erous and definite cognitions than taste. 
 
 1 have said above that the sensation of taste is not pc-r- 
 fe;!tly experienced unless Ae sapid substance is swallowol. 
 Whatever is swallowed enters the stomach, undergoes the 
 process of digestion, and, whether nutritious or deleteiious, 
 enters the circulation and becomes assimilatetl with our ma- 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SENSES. 
 
 49 
 
 tenal sjstem It i^ manifest, therefore, that if a substance 
 be pleasing to th( caste, we maj, by gratifying this sense, 
 ^w-llow eitlier what is in itself deleterious, or that which 
 .ecomes deleterious by being partaken of in excess. It is, 
 .ence, evidently important that the gratification of the 
 sense be made subordinate to the higher design : that of 
 promoting the health and vigor, physical and intellectual, 
 of the whole man. 
 
 In brutes, for the most part, the gratification of the appe- 
 tite is controlled by instinct. The instances are very rare 
 in which one of the lower animals has any desire for food 
 ■which is not nutritious, or desires it in larger quantity than 
 the health of the system demands. Man, however, is en- 
 dowed with no such instinct. The regulation of his appe- 
 tite is submitted to his will, directed by reason and con 
 science. Guided by these, a perfect harmony will exist 
 between his gustatory desire and the wants of his material 
 and intellectual organization. 
 
 But suppose it to be otherwise. Suppose the human be- 
 ing to swallow neither what nor as much as his health 
 requires, but what and as much as will furnish gratification 
 to his palate. He will eat or drink much that is delete- 
 rious, and much which, by excess, becomes destructive to 
 health. "When, by frequent indulgence, this subjection to 
 appetite has grown into a habit, the control of the spiritual 
 over the sensual is lost, and the man becomes either a glut- 
 ton or a drunkard, and very commonly both. 
 
 The effects of these forms of indulgence are too well 
 known to require specification. Gluttony, or tiie excessive 
 love of food, renders the intellect sluggish, torpid and inef- 
 ficient, cultivates the most degrading forms of selfishness, 
 exposes the body to painful and lingering disease, and fire- 
 tjuently termuiates in sudden death. 
 5 
 
50 INTILLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 " The full-fed glutton apoplexy knocks 
 
 Down to the ground at once, aa butcher felleth ox." 
 
 Thompson'' s Cadle of Indolnve. 
 
 The appetite for deleterious drinks leads to consequenckJ 
 Btill more appalling. In a very short time it ruins the 
 health, enfeebles the intellect, maddens the passions, de- 
 Btrojs all self-respect, and, in the most disgusting manner, 
 brutalizes the whole being. It speedily and insensibly grows 
 into a habit which enslaves the nervous organism, sets at 
 defiance the power of the will, and thus renders the ruin of 
 the being, both for time and eternity, inevitable. We hence 
 perceive the importance of holding our appetites in strict 
 subjection to the dictates of reason and conscience, and 
 especially of excUnling the possibility of our ever becoming 
 the victims of intemperance. 
 
 RE FERENCK 
 Reid's Inquiry, chapter 3 
 
 SECTION VI. — THE SENSE OF HEARING. 
 
 The organ of this sense is the ear. It is composed of 
 two parts, the external and mternal ear. The external ear 
 13 intended merely to collect and concentrate the vibrations of 
 the air, and conduct them to the membrana tympani^ 
 which separates the two portions of this organ. The 
 external ear thus performs the functions of an ear-trumpet. 
 The meinbiana tympani is a thin membrane stretched 
 across the lower extremity of the tube in which the outward 
 ear terminates. The vibrations of the air, thus produced 
 upon the tympanum, are, by a series of small bones occu- 
 pying its inner chamber, transmitted to certain cells filled 
 with fluid, in which the extrem'ty of the auditory nervn 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SENSES. 51 
 
 lerminates. From these cells the nerve proceeds directly tc 
 the brain. 
 
 The medium by which the auditory nerve is affected, ia 
 the atmospheric air. Sonorous bodies of all kinds produce 
 vibranons or undulations in the air, which strike upon the 
 kympmum, and are, by the apparatus above alluded to, con- 
 veyed to the auditory nerve. The effect produced upon the 
 nerve is simply that of mechanical vibration, and this vibra- 
 tion, so far as we can discover, is the cause of the sensation 
 of sound. A mere fluctuation in the extremities of the 
 nerve is the occasion of all the ielight which we experience 
 in listening to the subliraest compositions "of a Handel or a 
 Mozart. No more convincing proof can be afforded that 
 there is no conceivable resemblance between the change in 
 the organ of sense, and the delightful cognition of the soul, 
 which it occasions. 
 
 The number of sounds which the human ear is able to 
 distinguish is very great. Dr. Reid remaiks that there are 
 five hundred tones which may be distinctly recogniiied by a 
 good ear; and that each tone may be produced with five 
 hundred degrees of loudness. This would give us two hun- 
 dred and fifty thousand different sounds which could be per- 
 ceived by an ear of ordinary accuracy. This I presume ia 
 true; but a little reflection will convince us that the number 
 )f sounds which we are able to distinguish far transcends 
 all human computation. The voice of every human bfiing 
 may easily be distinguished from that of evei-y other, while 
 the number of separate sounds which every individual ia 
 able to produce, including tones, loudness, stress and em- 
 phasis, is absolutely incalculable. If the same note be 
 struck by ever so many different instruments, the ^ound ef 
 each mstrument can be readily recognized. If ten thou- 
 •aad instruments of the same kind were collected, it is prob- 
 fcble that no two could be found whose sounds would b« 
 
62 fNTELLECT DAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 identical. Numbers woich accumulate bj such masses set 
 all computation at defiance. 
 
 Although our power of distinguishing the smallest varia- 
 tion of sound is so remarkable, it has been observed that 
 there are some sounds which are inaudible to particular 
 persons. It seems probable that each ear is endowed with 
 the power of cognizmg sounds within a particular range, 
 but that this range is not the same in every individual 
 This difference is, I think, most observable in the shrillest 
 sounds, or those pitched on the highest key, and producer, 
 by the most rapid vibrations. I have known some persons 
 who were unable to hear the sound produced by a species of 
 cricket, while to other persons the sound was so loud as to be 
 unpleasant. I think that Dr. Reid remarks the same pecu- 
 liarity respecting himself. 
 
 We all possess, to a considerable degree, the power of 
 determining the direction from which sounds proceed. We 
 derive this powder, probably, in part, from the fact that our 
 ears are separated at some distance from each other, on op- 
 posite sides of the head, and hence a sound must, in many 
 cases, affect the one differently from the other. Persona 
 w ho have lost the use of one ear much less easily determine 
 the direction of sounds. This power, moreover, is greatly 
 improved by practice. We learn, in this manner, to form a 
 judgment of the distance of sounds, and to associate with 
 them much other knowledge which properly belongs to the 
 other senses. Thus, it is said that Napoleon was never de- 
 ceived as to the du-ection or distance of a cannonade, and 
 the remarkable precision of his judgment always excited the 
 wonder of his friends. 
 
 It is in this manner, I presume, that ventriloquism, as it 
 is termed, is to be explained. We have learned by experi- 
 ence to determine the distance and direction of scunds. 
 For instance, I hear a person speakmg. The quality of th« 
 
THE I.SDIVII' AL SEXSEJ. -Jl 
 
 noiind, its degiee of loudness and distinctness, teach me 
 that it is produced by some one on my left iiand, and in the 
 street which passes by my window. If a person in the rcom 
 with me were aole to produce a sound which should stiike 
 upon my ear precisely like that which I just now heard, I 
 should suppose that it proceeded from the same place aa 
 betore. The effect would be more remarkable, if he sliould, 
 by some ingenious device, direct my attention to the window, 
 and create in me the impression that some one was outside 
 of it. In order to accomplish this result, it is necessary 
 that the performer be endowed with an ear capable of de- 
 tecting every possible variety in the quality of sound, and 
 vocal organs of such extreme delicacy that they are able 
 perfectly to obey the slightest intimation of the will 1 
 have never witnessed any performance of this kind, but I 
 have known one or two persons who possessed this power in 
 a modified degree, and this is the account which they have 
 ^.ven me concerning it. I am told that those who perform 
 these feats publicly are also able to create the sounds which 
 ■we hear, without moving, in the least, the visible organs of 
 speech. How they are able, in this manner, to produce 
 articulate sounds, I am unable to explain. 
 
 Is hearing a sensation or a perception 7 That is, does it 
 furnish us with a simple knowledge, without giving us any 
 cognition of an external world ; or does Jt furnish us with a 
 complex knowledge, that is, a knowledge of a quality and 
 of the object in which it resides ? 
 
 The knowledge furnished by this sense seems to me to bo 
 of the following character : it is purely a sensation, a simple 
 knowledge, giving us no intimation of anything external 
 The knowledge, however, derived from this sense, differs 
 from those which we have already considered, in manv 
 particulars. Some of ihese are worthy of attenticn. 
 
 The sensation of hearing is much more definite. uan«^ 
 5* 
 
i\ INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHT. 
 
 and intensely pleasing, than that derived from either of the 
 preceding senses. It has, moreover, a power of strongly 
 affecting the tone of mind of the hearer. These impressiona 
 being made upon a being endowed with original sugges- 
 tion, would naturally occasion an inquiry for a cause. 
 While hearing a strain of music, it would at once occur to U3 
 that we did not produce it, that we could not prolong it, and, 
 hence, that it must originate from something external to our- 
 selves. We should thus learn that there existed something 
 out of ourselves ; but what that something was, the sense of 
 hearing would furnish us with no means of determining. 
 Let a man hear a violin, a bugle, or a piano, and, though he 
 would readily observe a difference between them, he could 
 by this sense alone form no conception of the nature of 
 either instrument, or of the medium through which an im- 
 pression was made upon his auditory nerve. When did a 
 peal of thunder ever suggest to man the nature of the cause 
 which produced it ? In this respect, therefore, the sense ot 
 hearing differs from those already considered. It suggests 
 to us the idea of a cause, but gives us no knowledge of the 
 nature of that cause. 
 
 In another respect, however, the sensation of hearing ia 
 peculiar. It enables us to form very definite conceptions. 
 Smell and taste possess this power, if at all, in a very lim- 
 ited degree. By no power of language can we convey to 
 another the knowledge which they give us. The sense of 
 hearing enables us to proceed much farther. We hear a 
 gound ; we can repeat it. We hear a tune ; we can mentally 
 reciill it without producing any sound whatever, and wo can 
 derive jileasure fiom this silent conception of it. Still 
 more, we are able to designate a great variety of articulate 
 sounds by the alpliabet. By means of this notation, the 
 ^unds of a speaker's voice can be so recorded, that anothei 
 person who has not heard him, and who may not even under 
 
TlIF TXDIVIDUAL SENSES. 50 
 
 itand tbo language in which ho has spoken, may be able 
 ftccuratf ly to repeat all that he has said. The case is still 
 strongei when the words uttered are set to music. Here 
 It )i not only possible to note down the words, but also 
 the precise musical notes in which they were expressed, so 
 that the scng. and the tune in whicii it was sung, may bo 
 iccuratcly repeated by a person on the other side of the 
 gbbc. 
 
 I have remarked that our conception of musical sounds 
 may give us pleasure in perfect silence ; as when we remem- 
 ber a strain which we have heard on a foimer occasion. 
 This is yet more observable when sounds are described by 
 their appropriate notation. A skilful musician will read 
 the noles of an opera or oratorio, form the conception as he 
 proceeds, and derive from them as definite a pleasure as he 
 who reads the pages of a romance or a tragedy. It has 
 frequintly happened that the most eminent musicians have 
 been afflicted with deafness. It is delightful to observe that 
 this infirmity in only a modified degree deprives them of 
 their accustomed pleasure. They sit at an instrument, 
 touching the notes as usual, and become as much excited 
 with their own. conceptions as they were formerly by sounds. 
 Under these circumstances, some of them have composed 
 their most elaborate and successful productions. These 
 facts establish a -vvide difference between the sense of hearing 
 and the senses of taste and smell. The latter produce in 
 us no definite conceptions, and are susceptible of being formed 
 into no such language. Hearing is evidently a much more 
 intellectual sense than either of those which we have tbiia 
 far considered. 
 
 Besides, musical sounds have an acknowledged power 
 over the tone of the human mind. By the tone of mind, I 
 mean that condition of our emotional nature which inclinei 
 as to be gi-ave or gay, lively or sad, kind oi austere. a]>f re- 
 
56 INTELLE^rUAL PHILOSOPHT. 
 
 hensive or reckless. New, it is well known that niusic hai 
 the power not only to harmonize with any of these tones cf 
 mind, and thus increase it, but in many cases to alter and 
 control it. Every one knows the difference between a sport- 
 ive and a melancholy air, between a dirge and a quickstep; 
 and every one also knows how readily his tone of mind as- 
 similates with the character of the music which he chances 
 to hear. Sacred music, well performed, renders deeper the 
 spirit of devotion. The hilarity of a ball-room would in- 
 stantly cease if the music were withdrawn. I question if 
 the martial spirit of a nation could be sustained for a single 
 year, if music were banished from its armies ; and military 
 evolutions, whether on parade or in combat, were performed 
 under no other excitement than the mere word of command. 
 From these well-known facts, an aesthetical principle may 
 be deduced of some practical importance. The design of 
 music is to affect the tone of mind. To do this, it must be 
 in hariTiony with it. No one would think a psalm tune 
 adapted to a charge of cavalry ; and every one would be 
 shocked to hear a devotional hymn sung to the tune of a 
 martial quickstep. It hence follows, that what may be 
 good music for one occasion, may be very bad music for 
 another. If we are called upon to judge of the excellence 
 of any piece of music, it is not enough that the music be 
 good, — the question yet remains to be decided, is it good for 
 this particular occasion ; that is, does it harmonize with the 
 particular tone of mind which the words employed would 
 naturally awaken 7 If it do not, though it may be very 
 good music for some occasions, it is bad music in this par- 
 ticular case. The II Penseroso and the L' Allegro of Mil- 
 ton have, I believe, been set to music, and, if the musio 
 v/ere adapted to the thought, the effect of these beautiful po- 
 ems would be increased by it. But every one sees that ths 
 music adapted to the one must be very unlike that adapteJ 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SENSES. 5* 
 
 to tLe Other. Let the music be transferred fiom the 
 one to the other, and the incongruity would be painful ; 
 and what was just now good music would become at once 
 intolerable, ^luch of the chuich music at present in vogue 
 acems to me to partake of the incongruity of such a trans- 
 position 
 
 Here, also, the question may be asked, whether all poetry 
 is adapted to music. From the preceding remarks it would 
 seem that it is not. unless it awaken some emotion. And 
 again, the emotion in some cases may not be adapted to 
 music. Terror, horror, the deepest impressions of awe, are 
 probably not adapted to musical expression. The attempta 
 which have been made to convey such emotions by music 
 have, I apprehend, generally failed. They may, like much 
 other music, display the skill of the composer or the per 
 former, but they leave the audience unmoved. 
 
 Another peculiarity of this sense deserves to be mentioned 
 By it we are capable of forming a natural language under 
 stood by all men. Our emotions mstinctively express them- 
 selves by the tones of the voice, and these are easily recog- 
 nized by those to whom they are addressed. Every one 
 understands the tones indicative of kindness, of authority, 
 of pity, of i-age, of sarcasm, of encouragement and contempt 
 Should a man address us in an unknown tongue, we 
 should immediately learn his temper towards us by the 
 tones of his voice. The knowledge of these tones is common 
 to all men, under all circumstances. Children of a very 
 tender age learn to interpret them ; nay, even brutes seem 
 to understand their meaning very distinctly. I: would seem, 
 then, that the tones of the voice form a medium of communi- 
 cation, not only between man and man. but even between 
 man and some of the inferior animals. 
 
 I have said that these tones of the voice are universally 
 understood. It is also true that they have the power of 
 
b& INTELLECTOAL PHILOSOPHr. 
 
 awakening an emoticn, similar to tliat which produced them, 
 in the mind of the hearer. A shriek of terror will convuls€ 
 a whole assembly. It is said that Garrick once went to 
 Lear Whitefield preach, and was much impressed with the 
 power of that remarkable pulpit orator. Speaking afterwai Ja 
 of the preacher's eloquence, he is reported to have said, '' I 
 would give a hundred pounds to utter the word Oh ! as White- 
 held utters it." It is probable that it is in the power of 
 expressing our emotions by the tones of the voice, more than 
 n anything else, that the gift of eloquence consists. This 
 was, I presume, the meaning of Demosthenes, who, when 
 asked what was the first, and the second, and the third ele- 
 ment of eloquence, replied, successively, "Delivery, delivery, 
 delivery ! " This is, I think, illustrated in the case to which 
 I have alluded. Whitefield's printed sermons do not place 
 him high on the list of English preachers ; while, as they 
 were delivered by Whitefield himself, they produced effects 
 which can only be ascribed to the very highest efforts of 
 eloquence. 
 
 The relation of these remarks to the cultivation of elo- 
 quence is obvious. Suppose a public speaker to be aMe to 
 construct a train of thought which shall lead the minda 
 of men, by logical induction, to a given result. Suppose, 
 moreover, that this train of reasoning is clothed in appro- 
 priate diction, so that it is adapted not only to convince, 
 but to please an audience. It is now to be delivered in the 
 hearing of men. It may be delivered in so monotonoua 
 t^jnes as to put an assembly to sleep, or in tones so inappro- 
 priate and grotesque as to provoke them to laughter. It ia 
 now necessary that the orator be deeply moved by his own 
 sonceptions, and that he be able to give utterance to his own 
 emotions in the tones of his voice. His organs of speech 
 n)uat be capable of every variety of expression, and they 
 must so instinctively respond to every emotion, that the 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SENSES S'J 
 
 thought wbich the speaker enunciates is lodged in the mind 
 of the hearer, animated by the precise feeling of him who 
 utters it. He who is thus endowed can hardly fail of 
 becoming an orator. Hence, if we ' would improve in 
 eloquence, we must studiously cultivate the natural tones 
 of emotion; in the first place by feeling truly ourselves, 
 and, in the second, by learning to express our emotions in 
 this language which all men understand. 
 
 REFERENCE. 
 Rcid's Inquiry, chap. 4, sections 1, 2 
 
 SECTION VII. — THE SENSE OF TOUCH. 
 
 The nerves of feeling are situated under the skin, and 
 are plentifully distributed over the whole external surface 
 So completely does the network which they form cover tho 
 whole body, that the point of the finest needle cannot punc- 
 ture us in any part without wounding a nerve, and giving ua 
 acute pain. It is in this manner that we are guarded from 
 injury. Were any portion of our body insensible, we might 
 there suffer the most appalling laceration without being 
 aware of our danger. 
 
 The chief seat of the nerves of touch is, however, in the 
 palm of the hand, and in the ends of the fingers. The 
 other parts of the body render us sensible of injury from 
 external sources, but they are incapable of furnishing ua 
 with any definite perceptions. The hand, on the contrary, 
 conveys to us very exact knowledge of the tactual qualities 
 of bodies. For this purpose it is admirably adapted. Tha 
 Boparation of the fingers from each other, their complicated 
 Qexions, the extreme delicacy of their muscular power, ikl; 
 
I 
 
 f)0 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 combine to render this organ susceptible of an infinite vari |t^ 
 of definite impressions. 
 
 Though the fingers are separated, yet in using then) 
 together, when a single object is presented, but one percep- 
 tion is conveyed to the mind. It would seem, however^ 
 that, in order to produce this result, corresponding points of 
 the fingers must be applied to the object. If we change 
 them from their normal position, by crossing the second over 
 the fore-finger, two perceptions will be produced, and a 
 small object, as a pea, will seem to us double. 
 
 Th(j sensation of touch is of two kinds, as it is caused, 
 first, by temperature^ and secondly by contact. 
 
 The sensation produced by temperature is that of cold or 
 heat. It is awakened by any body whose temperature diflfers 
 from that of our external surface. When we place our 
 hands in water only blood warm, we are not conscious of 
 this sensation. If we place one hand in hot, and the other 
 in cold water, for a few minutes, and then remove them both 
 to tepid water, we experience the sensation of heat in the 
 one and of cold in the other. 
 
 The eifect produced upon us by temperature is a simple 
 knowledge, a pure sensation. It gives us no knowledge 
 of anything external. During the first chill of a fever we 
 are unable to determine whether the weather is cold, or our 
 system diseased ; that is, whether the sensation proceeds 
 from without or from within. And when the sensation pi > 
 ceeds from without, it gives no information respecting ita 
 cause, or the manner in which it affects us. 
 
 Heat and cold are merely aflfections of a sensitive organ- 
 ism. That which causes them is called by chemista 
 caloric, This quality in bodies has opened a wide field for 
 philosophical investigation, Avhich, by developing the lawa 
 of steam, has modified the aspects of modern ciuliisw 
 lion. 
 
THE INDIVID AL SENSES. 6i 
 
 Secondly, the sense of touch is excited Dj contact. 1 
 Use the term contact here in its common, and not in ita 
 Btrict meaning. The nerves are alwavs covered with the 
 ekin, and when by accident the skin is abraded, we feel pain, 
 but we are conscious of no perception. Nor, in fact, is the 
 skin itself ever in absolute contact with the external object. 
 A layer of air always interposes between them. 
 
 When the hand is thus brought into proximity to an 
 external body, we are immediately made conscious of its 
 existence. In this act there may, I think, be discovered 
 both a sensation and a perception I have referred to this 
 fact in a previous section. Nothing further will here be 
 necessary than to appeal to the experience of every 
 individual. Let any one place his hand lightly upon a 
 piece of marble, or any external object, fixing his attention 
 as much as possible upon his sensation, and he will, I think, 
 find himself conscious of a feeling into which the idea of 
 extern:ility does not enter, and which gives him no knowl- 
 edge of the qualities of body. Let him now take up the 
 marble, and attempt to cognize iis several qualities, and I 
 think he will be conscious of a very different knowledge, 
 involving the notions of externality, hardness, smoothness, 
 form, and, it may be, some others. In this case he pays no 
 attention to his sensations It does not occur to him that 
 they exist. All he is conscious of is the various qualitie.3 
 of th-j external object, and of these he obtains a very dis- 
 tinct cognition. It may require a small effort at first to 
 distinguish these two fonns of knowledge from each other, 
 but I am persuaded that any one may do it who will be at 
 the pains for a few times to make the experiment. 
 
 The perceptions given us by this sense arc exceedingly 
 definite and perfect. By it we not only know that a quality 
 exists, but also what it is. We have the knowledge, and 
 ve know what it is that produces it. In this mannei tb« 
 
62 IN TELLE JTtAL x"'HILO<L_Pnr. 
 
 perceptions by touch lie at the founrlation of all our knowl- 
 rdge of an external world. We relj upon tbera with more 
 3ertaiiit3' than any other. Many of the qualities revealed 
 to us by touch are also revealed to us by sight. If, how- 
 ever, in any case, we have reason to doubt the evidence of 
 sight, we instinctively apply to the sense of touch in order 
 to verify our visual judgment. 
 
 The principal qualities cognized by touch, besides extcr- 
 nahty, are extension, hardness, softness, form, size, motion, 
 situation, and roughness or smoothness. Besides these, 
 however, there are various sensations of pain and pleasure 
 given by this sense, the specific effect of particular agents, 
 as of electricity and galvanism, the sensation of tickling, 
 and many others of the same kind. To this sense have also 
 been ascribed the sensation of hunger and thirst, and the 
 various affections belonging to our sensitive organism. 
 
 Confining ourselves, however, to the perceptions of touch, 
 ■we find that they are almost exclusively given us by the 
 hand. In this manner we obtain a distinct knowledge of 
 extension, of size, of hardness, softness and form. When 
 the body is small, or the discrimination delicate, we rely 
 almost wholly on tlie perceptive power of the fingers. In 
 this manner we obtain, experimentally, neaily all our knowl- 
 edge of the primary qualities of body. 
 
 We may here remark the difference between the knowl- 
 edge obtained by this sense, and that obtained by the senses 
 previously considered. The others give us each a particular 
 Lilass of sensations, and only one kind of knowledge. By 
 touch we are conscious of heat and cold, together with a 
 great variety of other sensations, and also of the various 
 perceptions of primary qualities mentioned above. The 
 others give us no direct knowledge of an external world. 
 This gives us that knowledge directly and immediately, 
 Ihe others, when the existence of an external world is sag- 
 
TEE IXDIVirjAL SENSE? 63 
 
 jTffttcd. give us no knowledge of its qualities. This givea 
 us a positive knowledge of scleral of the most essential of 
 thein. We know, for instance, that form is precisely what 
 it appears to be, and that our knowledge of it exactly con- 
 forms to the reality. We know that it must, under all 
 circumstances, be exactly what we perceive it to be. We 
 thus derive from it a distinct conception ; we can make it 
 an object of thought, and can form concerning it the most 
 complicated processes of reasoning. When we see a blind 
 J erson read with his fingers, we must be convinced that he 
 has as definite a conception of the forms of letters as we 
 ourselves have by sight. We thus learn that not only does 
 this sense enable us to make large additions to our knowl- 
 edge, but that it is really the original source of a great part 
 of our knowledge of the world around us. Of its intrinsic 
 importance we may form an opinion from the fact that there 
 is no case on record in which a human being has been born 
 without it. By it alone, as in the case of Laura Bridgraan, 
 we may learn our relations to the world around us : may 
 be tiiught the use of language, and may even acquire the 
 power of writing it with considerable accuracy. This sense 
 is lost only in paralysis, and in those cases in which the 
 mdividual, drawing near to dissolution, has no faither need 
 uf any of the organs of sense. 
 
 REFERENCE. 
 Reid'3 Inquiry, chap. 5, sections 1, 2. 
 
 SECTION VIII. — THE SENSE OF SIGHT. 
 
 The organ of vision is the eye. It is an optical uistru- 
 cent, of exquisite construction, adapted in the most perfi-sct 
 
84 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 manner to accomplish the purposes of its formatiyn. At 
 will, we can admit the light or surround ourselves with total 
 darkness. As we frequently pass from darkness to light 
 the eye is provided with a curtain, by means of which the 
 pupil is either expanded or contracted, so that no more light 
 than is required falls upon the retina. "We can turn the 
 eyes in every direction. By them we can discern objects 
 either gigantic or microscopic, within a few inches of us, 
 or at the distance of several miles. It gives us instan- 
 taneously a knowledge of the qualities of bodies, which 
 could be discovered by the other senses only after a long 
 and patient investigation, and of many qualities which, with- 
 out this sense, could never be discovered at all. Although 
 capable of such complicated action, and always in use ex- 
 cept when we sleep, the eye is comparatively seldom liable 
 to accident or disease. It is protected from ordinary vio- 
 lence by the overhanging brows. The fine particles of dust 
 which fall upon it are perpetually washed away by the com- 
 bined action of the eyelids and the lachrymal gland. Ita 
 rapid and incessant change of position, by calling into ac- 
 tion diflferent portions of the optic nerve, preserves it from 
 severe exhaustion. Thus it happens that a large portion of 
 mankind pass through life without ever knowing that their 
 eyes are even liable to disease. 
 
 The manner in which the impression is produced upon 
 the organ of vision has been fully explained by physiolo- 
 gists. The human eye is a small globe, so constructed that 
 the rays of light coming from a visible body which flill upon 
 it, are formed into a small image upon its inner posterior 
 BUI face. This image is inverted. The rays of light fii-st 
 fall upon the visible object, and are from it reflected upon 
 the eye. Of course, where there is no light, that is, when 
 no rays can be either received or reflected, there can be no 
 rision. 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SEN^SEi 66 
 
 Ovei the back part of the eye is spread out an expansioii 
 of the optic nerve, called the retina. Immediately behind 
 this, is a thin membrane, on which is laid a black pigment 
 for the absorption of the light producing the image. In 
 order to produce distinct vision, this image must be accu- 
 rately defined. Hence, in twilight, when the light is insuf- 
 ficient, an object is but imperfectly seen. When, owing to 
 Blight malformation of the eye, as in near-sighted or in aged 
 f/ersons, the image is not accurately delineated on the retina, 
 rision is also indistinct; nor can the infirmity be relieved 
 until by artificial means we cause the rays of light to form 
 a true image on the expansion of the optic nerve. If the 
 nerve become paralyzed, vision ceases. If it be inflamed, 
 vision is so intensely painful that the patient cannot, with- 
 out severe suffering, bear the least glimmer of light. The 
 nerves of vision do not proceed from each eye directly to the 
 brain, but first meet at what is called the decussation of the 
 optic nerve, where their fibres intermingle, after wiiich they 
 separate and enter the substance of the brain. What pur- 
 pose is answered by an arrangement so different from that 
 observed in the other nerves of sense, has not yet been dis- 
 covered. 
 
 When, under normal circumstances, the visual image ia 
 formed on the retina, a mental state succeeds which we call 
 vision. What this is we all know by experience. The 
 question, however, remains, Is sight a sensation or a per- 
 ception] and, if a perception, is it like the sense of touch 
 preceded by a sensation } Before proceeding further, let ug 
 attempt to answer these questions. 
 
 Is sight a sensation or a perception ? A sensation is a 
 limple knowledge, a state of mind terminating in itself, 
 fcnd. S3 far as our consciousness is concerned, having no 
 original connection with anything external. Now. if merely 
 the co-'nition of color is considered, w# must admit that it 
 6* 
 
5^ INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 reseiQ *e3 in many respects, the cognition of hearing. Tfaa 
 notioD ^r icnowk-dge of red. for iristuuce. is an affection of 
 the vAivd. and wholly unlike the cause from whjch it pre 
 ceeds No one sup[)0ses that the rose has the simple knowl 
 3dge which we designate by the word red. And, moreover 
 Jiis simple knowledge gives us not the most distant idea ot 
 its cause. Sight gives us no more knowledge of that <iual- 
 ity in bodies which produces in us the notion of color, than 
 acaring designates the size and form uf the instrument 
 ■nhich produces the sound to which we are listening, or the 
 atmospheric change which precedes the clap of thunder at 
 wiiich we tremble. In this respect the act of seeing resem- 
 bles a mere sensation. 
 
 On the other hand, it is to be remarked, that, although 
 the knowledge of color is a sensation, a subjective affection, 
 vet we are so made as to refer this knowledge directly and 
 immediately to the external object. When we reflect upon 
 the subject we know that the notion of red is a spiritual 
 affection, and yet that affection seems to be a part of the 
 rose. When we are conscious of an odor, we do not. so far 
 ;i3 the sense of smelling is concerned, assign it to any ex- 
 ternal location. When we hear a sound, so far as this sense 
 is concerned, we do not determine the place of its origin 
 The music seems to float around and envelop us, like the 
 atmosphere. But when we are sensible of a color, we see 
 it in a determined locality, we see it now and there, and at 
 once fix the limit of its existence. 
 
 Here, however, it may be said, that in this respect the 
 perception by sight is similar to that of touch ; that in 
 tfjuch we equally transfer our notioD of form to the object 
 Wiiich we perceive. The cases, I admit, are similar, but 1 
 think by no means identical. When I feel of a cube, ana 
 obtain a knowledge of its firm, it is obvious tliat the thought 
 of my mind is not like the cube — that is, it is not sMid 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SE.NSES. 01 
 
 equiangular an- 1 equilateral. It is, nevertheless, a posilivs 
 knowledge that such are the qualities of the cube. I know 
 that the thou^^Iit of mj mind reprcrients to me these quali- 
 ties just as they are. They are th«^ sufficient cause of that 
 particular idea, and nothing else could have been the cause 
 of it. It ifl a definite knowledge of a mode of the not me 
 admitting of no intermediate question. When, however^ 
 I see a color, the case is quite dissimilar. My notion of 
 color gives me no knowledge of its cause. I have by it n^- 
 knowledge of a particular mode of the not me, which, of 
 necessity, if it produce in me any knowledge, must produce 
 precisely that of which I am conscious. My sense of sight 
 does not inform me at all what color (objective) is. Tiiat 
 the existence of light is necessary to it, all men know ; but 
 what light is. in what manner it produces color, whether by 
 rectilinear rays reflected from the object, or by a succession 
 of waves oC a universal medium, is yet a matter of dispute 
 among philosophers. In the case of sight, then, if the 
 question be asked, what produces this knowledge, we can give 
 no answer. In the case of touch, we answer at once, the 
 form of a cube, — we all know what that form is, — and the 
 subject admits of no farther discussion. 
 
 I do not know whether I have made this distinctly ob- 
 vious to othei-s, or whether I have analyzed the act of 
 vision accurately. I have, however, endeavored as well as 
 I am able to stiite the facts in the case as they appear to my 
 8wn consciousness. 
 
 Is there in sight, as in touch, a sensation antecedent tc 
 perception, or a sensation which it is in our power to dis- 
 tinguish from perception 7 For myself, I have never bet n 
 ible to discover it. I place my Jiand. under different con- 
 JitioMS. on a cube, and I am able to distinguish the sensation 
 from the perception, and can make either of them, sepa- 
 rately, a matter of thought. I can discover no such di* 
 
53 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 tinct states of mind in the act of vision, I open my eyes 
 1 see a bock. The first thing of which I am conscious it 
 the cognition of an external object. I am conscious of no 
 intermediate or different mental state. I must, therefore, 
 believe that none exists. It may be said that one has existed, 
 but that, from long neglect, we ha\e lost the power of ob 
 serving it. To this I reply, that we habitually neglect the 
 sensation in the perception of touch, but, when it is pointed 
 out to us, we easily recognize it. If it existed in the sense 
 of seeing, I see no reason why we should not as easily ob- 
 serve it. The simple fact seems to be, that, as soon as we 
 are conscious of the knowledge of color, we are, at the same 
 instant, conscious of the knov\ ledge of the object in which 
 the color seems to reside. We cannot separate the one 
 from the other. 
 
 The perception of an object as endowed with color is, 
 however, in some respects, unlike the perception of an ob 
 jcct as endowed with foi-m. 
 
 The perception by touch is fixed and definite, in all posi- 
 tions remaining precisely the same. The perception by 
 sight varies by every change of position. For instance, if 
 a small cube is placed in my hands, I turn it over and feel 
 of it on all sides, and it ever presents itself to me as the 
 same figure. On the other hand, I look upon it with one of 
 its faces directly before me, and it presents one appearance. 
 I turn one of the angles towards me, and it presents another. 
 I change its position a hundred times, and at every time it 
 presents a different appearance. 
 
 Again, the perception by touch is unafiected by distance. 
 I feel of a cube, and I derive a clear knowledge of its form. 
 I extend my arms to their utmost length, and the perception 
 is the same. I think of it a mile off, and my notion of it 
 does not 'ary. But it is not so with the perception of sight. 
 I look at a cube at a distance of twelve inches from mj^ 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SENSES. 69 
 
 pyea, it has one magnitude. I remove it i«.n feet iff, jind 
 its apparent magnitutle is ten times less. Its color is lesa 
 vivid, and its outline less distinct. I remove it to the dis- 
 tance of an hundred feet, and it is diminished to an indis- 
 tinct speck. If I would represent it to another person, 1 
 must represent it thus indistinctly. Hence the distinction 
 made between tactual and visual form and magnitude. 
 
 We have the means of associating these two ideas together 
 in a manner hereafter to be considered. We are able to 
 translate the language of sight into the language of touch. 
 This, however, would be unnecessary, were there not thia 
 difference in the two perceptions to which I have here re- 
 ferred. 
 
 If we observe the relation in which the senses stand to 
 each other, we shall at once perceive the importance of 
 sight. Smell and taste give us simple knowledges, without 
 any cognition of the not me, and, also, I think, without the 
 power of forming conceptions. Hearing sugo-esls tLe not me. 
 and gives us the power of forming conceptions; but it gives 
 us no knowledge of any of the attributes of the sonorous 
 body, save its power of awakening this sensation. Touch 
 gives us an immediate and positive knowledge of the not 
 me, and of all its primary attributes, and leavv,-s upon the 
 mind a most definite conception. Sight enables us to deter- 
 mine most of the qualities revealed to us by touch, not only 
 near at hand, but at great distances : by the delicacy of its 
 language, it enables us to discover many of the qualities re- 
 veak'd by the other senses ; and, while performing all these 
 functions, it is a source of most exquisite pleasure. 
 
 That the conceptions of sight are more definite than tho9« 
 f ?ceived by our sense of touch. I will not affirm. It i.s, 
 however, certain that they are mucn more easily retained 
 in the memory. When we recollect an external obj:ct, I 
 think we much nore readily recall the visual conceftioD 
 
TO INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 thar anj other. I may feel of a sphere, and obtain a 
 knowledge of its form and magnitude ; but when I think of 
 it. the visual appearance presents itself most readily to my 
 mind. Almost all the conceptions of figurative language 
 are derived from sight. The power of originating such con- 
 ceptions is called imagination, or the power of forming im. 
 ages. The fine arts, with the exception of music, address 
 themselves wholly to this mode of perception. Alm.ost all 
 the other senses are, in some manner, tributary to it, and 
 thus enable us to employ it in order to arrive at the most 
 varied and distant forms of knowledge. 
 
 Let us now proceed to inquire, what are the qualities of 
 the external world which are cognized by means of thia 
 sense ? 
 
 1. If the above remark be true, that we are so made aa 
 to refer our visual conception to the external object, it will 
 follow that we derive our cognition of externality as truly 
 from this sense as from touch. Touch gives us a distinct 
 and immediate notion of the existence and qualities of an 
 external object. Sight gives us a conception of an unknown 
 cause of a known effect ; it also teaches us that this c;»^use is 
 numerically distinct from ourselves, and assigns to it its 
 position in space. 
 
 The existence of this function of vision has frequently 
 been denied, and it has been affirmed that, until aided by 
 :x)uch, sight gives us no idea of externality, any more than 
 smell or hearing. The principal ground for this opinion ig 
 the authority of Cheselden,* who, long since, published an 
 account of a young man whom he coucl-.ed for cataract, and 
 who, on restoration to sight, thought, at first, that every 
 object touched his eyes. On this statement I would observe, 
 lliat 3n the first admission of light to the unnaturally sensi- 
 
 • Philosophical Transactions, 1778, No. 402. 
 
THE INDIVIDUAL SENSES. 71 
 
 tive retina, a sensation unlike to sight ^vould be lik'^ly tc 
 (iiHse, which the patient might very j)Vobably designato hy 
 Baying that the object touched his eyes. Every one, in 
 passing frcm daikness into a strong light, has felt a sensa- 
 tion of this kind, and he may remember that it is more 
 nearly akin to touch than to sight. If we had before known 
 everything by touch, we should naturally use this language 
 in describing it. On this account, I think the case does not 
 warrant the stress that has been laid upon it. But, secondly, 
 if it were so, if he thought that the objects touched his 
 eye, then, as Sir W. Hamilton has happily remarked, " still 
 they appeared external to th.e eye," for it is evident that 
 two things cannot seem to touch each other, unless, at the 
 same time, also, they appear numerically distinct. That 
 which is numerically distinct from the eye must be the non 
 ewo. Besides, the young of all animals, as soon as they 
 open their eyes, recognize external objects as external, and, 
 with evident design, move either towards or away from 
 them. In fact, they use their eyes at first just as they use 
 them afterwards. A new-born infant teaches us the same 
 truth. Who ever saw a young child place its hand on its 
 eyrs when an object was placed before it / It reaches out 
 its hand towards the object, without, it is true, any correct 
 idea of distance, but with a correct conception of external- 
 ity and direction. I think that all our observation upon 
 cur own use of this faculty must lead us to the sanie C(m- 
 clusion. 
 
 2. From this sense, exclusively, we obtain our know ledge 
 of color. Of the nature of this cognition I have already 
 had occasion to express my opinion. It is a simple knowl- 
 edge hi itself, an affection of the sentient being, which, how- 
 ever, we naturally and immediately refer to the external 
 object. Of this quality, thus recognized, the varieties ar€ 
 nomercus, and they are indefinitely multiplied ly <hp cir 
 
72 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 cumstances of light and shade, distance and proximity 
 degiee of illumination, and manj others. Hence it is that 
 exte)nal nature presents to us an exhaustless and ever- varied 
 scene of beauty and sublimity. Every object in the -svoild 
 around us, which the hand of God has formed, is made to 
 minister to our happiness. But this is only a small part of 
 the benefit which we derive from this function of sight. 
 pAxry change of color, and every variation in tiie degree of 
 rolor, is indicative of some change which is originally cog- 
 nized by some other sense. Hence it is that sight, which 
 acts instantaneously, and cognizes its objects at large dis- 
 tances, 's enabled, by changes of visual appearance, to detect 
 an immense number of qualities wiiich vision alone could 
 never h'ive discovered. All tlie senses become tributary to 
 it, and it does the work of all. Of the manner in which 
 this is done, we shall treat more particularly in the follow- 
 ing section. 
 
 3. To the qualities of external bodies, rendered cognizable 
 by sight, we must undoubtedly add extension. If we refer 
 our notion of color to <in external object, I do not see how 
 it is possible to exclude from our minds the knowledge that 
 the colored object is extended. If we look upon anything 
 colored, that color covers a definite portion of space. Let 
 any one look upon a surface marked alternately by different 
 colors, and the limitations of each are distinctly defined. 
 Hence also, arises the idea of form in one dimension. We 
 can as well cognize a circle or square by sight as we can 
 do it by touch. We read as rapidly by the eye as the bl-'iid 
 by their fingers. 
 
 4. Lastly, we must now add solidity, or extension in 
 three dimensions, to the perceptions given us by sight. 
 Until (juite lately, this power has been denied to the faculty 
 of vision. It has been the generally received opinion that 
 «i^ht gives us nothing but the different shades of color. 
 
THE INDIVIDLAL SENSES. |8 
 
 represented on a plane surface, as we perceive them in a 
 painting ; but tliat by touch we learn to associate the 
 shading with the form, and thus indirectly learn to cognize 
 solidity by the eye. This view was universally received, 
 until the researches of Professor Wheatstone, of King's Col- 
 lege, London, threw new light upon the whole subject. The 
 brilliant discoveries of this philosopher have added a new 
 function to the organ of vision, and demonstrated that, by 
 the eye alone, we are enabled to cognize solidity as well as 
 simple extension. He has shown that, in consequence of 
 binocular vision, we are able to determine the form of 
 bodies within a certain distance. The manner in which this 
 is accomplished is as follows : It must be obvious to every 
 one, that, inasmuch as the right and left eye occupy different 
 positions in space, the images which an external object forms 
 dn the two eyes must be slightly dissimilar. I look upon 
 an inks:and on the table before me, closing first my right 
 eye and then the left. I can clearly discover a differ- 
 ence between the right and left image. Now, it is this 
 difference of figure in the two images that gives us the 
 notion of solidity. This is proved by the stereoscope, an 
 mvention of Professor Wheatstone. This instrument is so 
 constructed that we can see separately the image of an 
 object formed on the right eye, and then that formed on the 
 left. 
 
 When seen in this manner, each figure appears to us as a 
 mere di awing on a plane surface. When now we look at 
 them with both eyes, we do not perceive two plane drawings, 
 but a distinct, and, I had almost said, palpable solid. It is 
 however evident that this effect can be produced only when 
 the body is at so small a distance, and of such a magnitude, 
 ihat two images can be formed. If it be far off, so that 
 the rays become parallel, and thus form the same image on 
 both eyes, no effect from binocular vision is produced. We 
 7 
 
r-i intellectijal philosophy. 
 
 observe the tru'.h of this law in our daily experience. Wuea 
 we look upon a well-executed painting, every figure, when 
 viewed from a proper position, appears to stand out from 
 the canvas. It seems to us impossible that it should be a 
 plane surface. But if we draw near, the illusion vanishes. 
 When we arrive at the position at which the figures, if sclid^ 
 would form different images on the two eyes, and no sucb 
 difference exists, we know at once that the surface is a plane. 
 If it be objected that persons Avith one eye are able to dis- 
 tinguish solidity, it is replied that they do it less perfectly 
 than others ; that they are obliged to do it by observing 
 the shading of the surface, and that they are frequently seen 
 to move the head in a horizontal direction rapidly, in order 
 to form the different images on the same eye.* 
 
 In consequence of this discovery, a very beautiful optical 
 instrument has been invented, by which the effect of 
 daguerreotype pictures has been much improved. A picture 
 is taken separately for each eye. When these are looked 
 at together, through glasses adapted to the purpose, we per- 
 ceive only one figure ; but it has all the appearance of 
 Bolidity. Daguerreotypes of statuary have thus all the 
 effect of the original marble. 
 
 The question has frequently been asked, How do we see 
 objects single with two eyes 7 To this question I do not 
 know that any more satisfactory answer has been given than 
 the plain statement of the fact that so we were created. It 
 seems to me not half so strange as the fact that we see at 
 all. But I would inquire, is it more remarkable that we 
 receive a single impression from two organs of sight, than 
 from any of our other senses 7 All our nerves of sense are 
 double. Every other sense has a right and a left nerve ; yet 
 fcll the impressions made upon us from a single object are 
 
 « Transactions of the Roya S«>ciety, vol. 56, p. 371. June 21, 1838. 
 
THE INDIVID CAL SENSES. 7f) 
 
 •ingle Each ear receives an auditory impulse, yet we heai 
 but one sound. When we feel of an object, each hand 
 receives a distinct impression, yet we perceive but one 
 object. It does not seem strange to us that we do not heai 
 two sounds with two ears, or that we do not feel two cubes 
 when we hold one with our two hands. The case, however, 
 seems to me precisely similar to that in whi<Jh we look upon 
 one object with our two eyes. The sense of sight, then, 
 merely conforms to the general law by which all our senses 
 are governed. It would seem, then, unnecessary to proceed 
 farther than to refer the case of sight to the general law 
 of the senses. The question thus resolves itself into the 
 general one. How are single impressions made v.ith double 
 organs 1 To this I do not know that any answer has been 
 either given or attempted. 
 
 Again, it has been asked, How do we see objects erect, 
 when the image on the retina is inverted] Dr. Reid 
 answers this (question by stating it as a general law that we 
 see every object in the direction of the right line that 
 passes from the picture of the object on the retina to the 
 centre of the eye, " as the rays from the upper part of the 
 object form the lower part of the image, and, vice versa, 
 we see the upper part of the object with the lower part of 
 the retina, and the contrary ; and thus we see the object as 
 it is, that is, we see it erect." In how far this relieves the 
 difficulty, or carries us back to a moie general law, I will not 
 pretend to determine. To me it does not seem to throw that 
 h'dit on the subject which seems obvious to others. I have 
 thought that, possibly, this eflfect was in some way connected 
 with the decussation of the optic nerve. No nerves, except 
 those of sight, unite before entering the brain, and in no 
 other case is this peculiarity observed. May there not be 
 lome connection between the facts 7 
 
 Persons who have been couched for cataract see objects 
 
76 JlIM -t.U;<^T AL PHILOSOPHY 
 
 erect as .oor a? tb^ir pow« of vision is restore _ At least, 
 Oiieselden and other observers have never stated anything 
 to the contrary. This could hardly have been the case if 
 90 striking a phenomenon had passed under their notice. 
 To this there seems but one exception. Sir W. Hamilton 
 quotes a case from Professor Leidenfrost, of Duisburg, 1793, 
 in which the fact was otherwise. A young man. blind 
 from birth, had reached his seventeenth year, when his sight 
 was restored after an attack of ophthalmia. When he first 
 saw men, they seemed to him inverted ; that is, their heads 
 w. -re towards his feet ; and trees and other objects seemed 
 rJ hold the same position. I am unable to account for 
 this difference from ordinary experience. I would only 
 remark, that we are always liable to err in reasoning from 
 instances of this kind, because, when the condition of au 
 organ is decidedly abnormal, it is impossible to say to what 
 extent and in what direction the abnormal cause has been 
 %xerted. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Sense of sight — Reid's Inquiry, chap. 6. 
 
 Sight the noblest of our senses, " •* section 1. 
 
 No sensation in sight, " •' section 8. 
 
 Relation of visual to real figure, " " sections 23 and 7. 
 
 Color a quality of body, " «« sections 4 and 5. 
 
 Parallel motion of the eyes, '• •• section 10. 
 
 How we see objects erect, ** " sections 11 and 12. 
 
 How we see objects single, *' " section 13. 
 
 We know not how the image on the retina causes vision, section 12 
 
 Carpentei 's Physiology, article eight. 
 
 Cheselden's case— Phil. Transactions, 1728, No. 102, 
 
 Wheatstone's paper, Phil. Trans., vol. 56, p. 871. 
 
 Pfof Lie<leifro8t's case, Sir W. Hamilton — Beid, p. 158L 
 
ACQUIRED PEKCEPTIONS. 71 
 
 iRCTION IX. — OF ACQUIRED PERCEPTIONS, OR THE INTER- 
 
 GHANOEABLE USE OF TlIE SENSES. 
 
 It has been already remarked that each of our senses 
 furnishes us with a distinct species of knowledge. We 
 cognize odors by smell, sounds by the ear, colors by the 
 eye, and so of all the rest. Neither of the senses can be 
 used in the place of the other. We can neither see with 
 our ears, hear with our fingers, nor smell with our tongue. 
 Such is manifestly the fact, if our senses be considered 
 separately. 
 
 But when the senses are considered collectively, we find 
 ♦hat the above statement does not convey the whole truth. 
 One sense seems to convey to us knowledge which could 
 have been gained only by another. A single perception 
 will frequently furnish us with knowledge, which we find, 
 upon reflection, to have been originally given us by the 
 action of another sense ^r by the combined action of several 
 of the senses. Considered in this light, our whole sensual 
 organism seems to be one complicated system, designed in 
 the most rapid and convenient manner to make us ac- 
 quainted with the external world. We find ourselves, in a 
 thousand cases, using one sense for another, whenever we 
 can do it with advantage ; and if by misfortune we are de- 
 prived of any particular sense, it is surprising to observe 
 how readily the remaining senses come to our aid, and enable 
 us to cognize objects in a manner which, at first view, would 
 Beem uttei ly impossible. 
 
 The process by which this effect is produced is the fol- 
 lowing : We have already observed that the variety of 
 impressions which may be received by several of our sensea 
 is beyond the power of computation. Who can estimate thfl 
 infinite number of sounds which we are capable of heariDj^ ; 
 7* 
 
• 5 INTELLECT AL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 or of color and shading which we are capable of seeing, 
 and of distinguishing from each other ? Now, wc find that 
 a quality cognized by one sense is, by the kind provision of 
 our Creator, connected with some modification of a quality 
 perceived by another sense. Observing this connection, we 
 learn to associate the original with the secondary quality, 
 and, from the observation of the one, to infer the existence of 
 the other. For example, if I wish to learn whether a body 
 is hard or soft, I employ the sense of touch. This is the 
 sense originally given to me for the purpose of gaining 
 this knowledge. I see before me a piece of polished marble, 
 and a piece of velvet, of the same color. I feel of them 
 both, and ascertain that the one is hard, and the other soft. 
 But I also observe that the visual appearance of these two 
 substances is dissimilar. I carefully note this difference. 
 When I see the same objects again, I shall not be obliged 
 to feel them ; I know, at a glance, not only the visual but 
 the tactual character of each. I go farther ; I generalize 
 this difference. I know that one visual appearance, where- 
 ever it is seen, indicates hardness, and another softness. 
 Hence, when we, for the first time, look upon a substince, 
 we commonly form an opinion of its hardness or softness 
 from its peculiarity of color. Hence, also, we frequently 
 use the language of one sense for that of another. We say 
 of a surface that it looks hard or it looks soft. So paint- 
 ers, hav ing observed that warm weather in summer is accom- 
 panied by a particular appearance of the sky, associate the 
 language of feeling with that of sight, and speak of a warm 
 sky, of wirm or of cold coloring, and of other distinctioug 
 of a similar character. 
 
 Illustrations of acquired perceptions are presenting them- 
 Belves to us every day, in the ordinary experience of life. 
 The apothecary learns how to distinguish medicines by their 
 Bmell as accui-ately as by their taste. The mineralogist ^>^ 
 
ACQUIREL PEIICEPTIONS. 78 
 
 breathing upon a mineral, and observing its smell, ■will know 
 in an instant whether it is or is not argillaceous. Or 
 again, he will distinguish a calcareous from a magnesian 
 mineral by the touch ; or he will determine the charactei 
 of another by its fracture. If a grocer wishes to know 
 wlu'ther a cask is full or empty he does not look into it, 
 but merely strikes upon it, and ascertains the fact in an 
 instant by sound. A mason who wishes to know if a wall 
 in a particular spot is solid, does not pull it down, tut 
 Strikes it with his hammer. In the same way we determine 
 whether an object before us is made of wood, or metal, or 
 stone. When these indications are closely observed, the 
 accuracy of the judgments to which they lead is frequently 
 very remarkable. It is said that an Indian hunter, on the 
 prairies, by placing his ear on the ground, will discover the 
 aj)proach of an enemy long before he can be recognized by 
 the eye, and will distinguish a herd of buffaloes from a troop 
 of dragoons with unerring certainty. We are told that the 
 Arabs will tell the tribe to which a passer-by belongs, by the 
 print of his foot in the sand, and by the track of a hare 
 will know whether it be a male or a female. 
 
 Inasmuch, however, as our visual perceptions are more 
 varied and more rapid than those of our other senses, and 
 as we, by the eye, cognize objects at great distances, the 
 greater part of our acquired perceptions are referred to this 
 sense. We judge of the qualities of almost all the sub- 
 stances in daily use by the eye alone. We continually 
 determine distance and magnitude by the eye. The manner 
 in which this is done is worthy of special notice. It is Avell 
 known that, as an object recedes from us, its visual appear- 
 ance presents several observable changes. First, its magni- 
 tude diminishes. Secondly, its color becomes dim and misty. 
 Thiidly, its outline becomes indistinct; and, fourthly as ita 
 distance increases, the numl-er of intervening object! 
 
50 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 becomes greater, it is by tlie observation of these changei 
 that we determine whether objects are receding from, oi 
 advancing towards us. In the same manner, by comparing 
 these indications, we judge of the distance and magnitude 
 of any object. In every case of this kind we go through a 
 complicated act of judgment ; yet, from habit, we do it so 
 rapidly, that we should hardly be aware of it but from the 
 mistakes which we occasionally commit. For instance ; 1 
 see an object presenting a certain dimness of color, of a 
 certain indistinctness of outline, and of a given visual mag- 
 nitude, and observe various objects intervening between it 
 and me. This is all that the sense of sight gives me. J 
 immediately judge it to be a man of ordinary size, half a 
 mile off; and my judgments are so generally accurate, that 
 I am surprised if I find myself in error. 
 
 When, however, any one of these conditions is changed 
 we are liable to be deceived. This is commonly the case 
 when objects are seen through a mist. The deception here 
 is not occasioned, as is generally supposed, by refraction 
 of the rays of light, causing the object to seem larger. 
 The object really seems to us of the proper size. The 
 mist, however, rendeis the color and the outline indistinct, 
 and we suppose the o1)ject to be at a much greater distance 
 than it is. The body has the magnitude belonging to a 
 quarter of a mile in distance, with the indistinctness of half 
 a mile. With this magnitude, at the latter distance, it would, 
 of course, seem to us much larger than it actually is 
 An incident, illustrative of this fact, once occurred to the 
 author. lie was, early in the morning, in a dense fog 
 Bailing through the harbor of Newport, and passed near the 
 wharf of Fort Adams. He observed on the wharf some \ery 
 tall men, and mentioned their remarkable size to the friends 
 who accompanied him. Piesently he was struck with their 
 behavioi'. They were jumping and playing like children 
 
ACQCIBED PERCEPT. ONS. 8l 
 
 in a m;innei that seemed to him uhollj unaccountahle 
 Presently, as the sun dispersed the fog, he found himself 
 close to the v^harf, and these gigantic men dwindled dowii 
 to a company of playful little boys, who were amusing 
 themselves in childish gambols. 
 
 In the same manner we mistake if the atmosphere ia 
 lEore transparent than that to which we are accustomed. 
 Bishop Berkeley, I think, remarks that English travellera 
 in Italy, unaccustomed to the clear sky of southern Europe, 
 were liable to continual misjudgment respecting the distance 
 of objects seen in the horizon. The clearness of the color, 
 and the distinctness of the outline, led them to suppose 
 castles, mountains, &c., much nearer than they really were. 
 In the same manner, when there are no intervening objects, 
 we frequently find our judgments at fault. Thus, in looking 
 over a sheet of water, we always underrate the distance. 
 When we throw a stone at an object in the water, we always 
 find that our eye has deceived us, and the stone falls far 
 phort of the mark. For the same reason, objects seen on the 
 shore from the water seem much less than their natural 
 size. The fiict is, they appear of the magnitude which 
 belongs to the distance, but we suppose the distance less 
 than it is ; and, associating this magnitude with diminished 
 distance, they appear to us less than they really are. 
 
 In order to form these judgments correctly, one of these 
 elements must be fixed. From this we learn to institute a 
 comparison, and then an accurate opinion is formed. If we 
 have the magnitude of the object, the change in its color 
 and outline teaches us its distance. If we know its distance, 
 we can judge of its magnitude. Hence, painters, in order 
 to give us a correct notion of an object which they repre- 
 sent, always place in its vicinity something with whose real 
 magnitude we are familiar. Thus, if I drew a pyramid, it 
 mijiht be ditficult to determine whether I intended to repre* 
 
52 INTELLECTUAL PHIL 3S0PHT. 
 
 gp.nt it as large or small. If, however, I diew an Aral 
 standing bj his camel at the foot of it, my intention tvould 
 at once become apparent. Every one knows the size of a 
 camel, and from this he would judge of the magnitude ci 
 the pyramid. 
 
 The benefits which we derive from this interchangeabk 
 Qse of the senses are innumerable. We are thus enabled 
 to transfer to one sense the cognitions which belong to 
 another, always using that which we can employ with the 
 greatest rapidity and convenience. Our whole sensitive 
 organism is thus capable of being used for almost every 
 form of cognition. Very much of our early education, 
 especially the education which enables us to perform any 
 art, consists in the acquisition of these secondary percep- 
 tions. It is thus that the physician, from symptoms, or 
 external indications which another person would not observe, 
 is enabled to discover the locality, the nature, and the pro- 
 gress of disease, and frequently to foretell the result with 
 unerring accuracy. 
 
 The l>enefit of this arrangement is specially evident when 
 we are unfortunately deprived of any one of our senses. 
 Our acquired perceptions are then almost indefinitely mul- 
 tiplied, and the knowledge which we derive fi'om our re- 
 maining senses is sometimes so great as to appear almost 
 incredible. Thus, the blind, by paying strict attention to 
 the indications derived from touch and hearing, acquire an 
 accuracy of judgment, respecting things known to others by 
 sight alone, which greatly surprises us. It is said that they 
 can learn to determine, with great accuracy, the number of 
 persons in a room by observing the sound of a speaker's 
 voice, and that, by striking on the floor, they will form & 
 very correct opinion as to the size of an apartment. Dr. 
 Abercrombie mentions two blind men who were remark 
 ably good judges of ha'ses. One of then discovered, 05 
 
ACQUIRED PERCEPTIONS. 00 
 
 R parcicular occasion, that a horse was blind by cleernng 
 the manner in which he pLiced his feet upon the ground 
 when in raotion. ahhougli the fact had not been noticed by 
 any other person of the company. Another discovered that 
 a horse was blind of one eye, by observing that the temper- 
 ature of the eyes was different. On the other hand, the 
 deaf acquire great skill in judging of the qualities of bodies 
 by touch and sight. They will learn to understand a 
 speaker by the motion of his lips, and to interpret the 
 minutest shades of emotion by the changes in the counte- 
 nance. AVhen both sight and hearing are denied, a large 
 amount of knowledge may be acquired by smell and feeling. 
 Persons in this unfortunate condition have been known to 
 select their own clothes, out of a pile of clean linen, by smell. 
 The most remavkabb instance on record of the education of 
 a person under these circumstances, is found in the case of 
 Laura Bridgnian. who has been for several years under the 
 care of Dr. Samuel G. Howe, of the Massachusetts Asylum 
 for the Blind. She has from infancy been deprived both of 
 hearing and sight. She has, nevertheless, been taught the 
 alphabet for the blind ; she converses rapidly with her 
 fingers, writes very intelligibly, and uses the language 
 which designates the qualities of color and sound with con- 
 siderabli; accuracy, knows her friends and instructors, and 
 feels for them every sentiment of gratitude and affection. 
 
 It will readily occur to every one that great use may be 
 made of acquired perceptions in the practice of the various 
 arts and professions. "We thus are enabled to determine 
 facts and form judgments which would otherwise be impos- 
 sible. An illustration of this kind presents itself in the 
 ttsfe of the stethoscope, a small ear-trumpet, by means of 
 which physicians listen to the sound midc by the lungs in 
 breathing, and by the heart in pulsation. A few yean 
 fcuce. it waa observed that these sounds varied with the oon 
 
a^ INTELLECTUAL PHIl JSOPHT. 
 
 dition of these organs in health and in disease. This obser. 
 vation led to a verj impoitant result. First, the sound 
 made by the lungs in health was distinctly ascertained. 
 Then the variations from it were noticed. If the disease 
 terminated in death, the condition of the lungs was ascer- 
 tained by inspection. The sound was thus associated with 
 tne particular disease wliich occasioned it. This mode of 
 observation was continued until almost every form of disease 
 in the chest was recognized and made to speak an audible 
 language. When this language has been learned by one 
 man, it can be taught to another ; and thus this important 
 means of acquiring knov/ledge has become common to phy- 
 sicians. Practitioners, who have paid sufficient attention to 
 this subject, and who are endowed with great delicacy of 
 hearing, have been able to discover with remarkable ac- 
 curacy the condition of the organs of the chest, the form of 
 disease under which the patient has been laboring, and even 
 to mark out on the surface the precise portion of the lunga 
 which was suffering from inflammation. 
 
 The manner in which our acquired perceptions may be 
 improved is manifestly as follows. In the first place, we 
 learn to observe with the greatest accuracy the minutest 
 dififerences in the impressions made upon our organs of 
 sense. ^Ye are thus enabled to discover the slightest change 
 of color or of outline, the minutest differences in hardness, 
 smoothness or temperature, and the almost imperceptible 
 variations in sound and interval. The nicer our d-'ecri mi- 
 nation in these respects becomes, the wider is the field of 
 observation open to discovery. In this respect, much must 
 depend upon the original perfection of the organs themselves : 
 but that more depends upon careful cultivation, is evident 
 from the fact that whole tribes of savages, of by nc meana 
 delicate organization, attain to remarkable accaracj la th« 
 asc of their organs of sense, 
 
ACOriRED «>ERCEPTION0. 8& 
 
 Secondly, we must learn to associate with each variation 
 observed by one sense, the quality or condition discovered 
 by another sense. In this manner we acquire the language 
 of nature, and are enabled to interpret it for our own bene- 
 fit and the benefit of others. We are thus able to form 
 judgments which, to the uninitiated, seem like the result of 
 magic. Thus, distinctness and indistinctness of color and 
 outline teach us the magnitude and distance of objects many 
 miles off. Thus the Indian, by observing minute differ- 
 ences of sound, will form an accurate judgment undei 
 circumstances Avhich would leave other men wholly in dark- 
 ness. 
 
 The physician, by placing his ear on the chest of his 
 patient, can tell whether the organs within are healthy or 
 diseased, and can thus the better employ such m^ans of 
 cure as will accomplish the result which he proposes. 
 
 It is hardly necessary to remark that the progress of 
 the arts enables us to cultivate our acquired perceptions 
 with greater success. The microscope and the telescope 
 have greatly increased our power in this respect. Instru- 
 ments for observing infinitesimal changes in temperature 
 will probably lead to similar results. The tendency of 
 science is in this direction, and it will, without doubt, lead 
 to a rich harvest of discovery. 
 
 Before closing this section, it is proper to remark that 
 in the use of acquired perceptions we are liable to form 
 false judgments, and then to complain that our senses have 
 deceived us. I once saw, on a door-post, the painting of 
 a key hanging on a nad, and it was so well executed that 
 1 was not aware of the deception until I attempted to take 
 it down. Here it might be said that my senses deceived 
 me, but such was not the fact. My ey;:s testified truly to 
 all that they promised to mike known. They testified to a 
 certain color and shading. This <*Y'denco wa.3 in its naiuro 
 
86 irfTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 ambiguous tor the effect might be produced either by 8 
 painting or bj a real key. Without sufficient attention, 1 
 inferred that it was a key, when I ought to have examined 
 it more carefull3^ But nij senses did not deceive me. for 
 the eye testified truly, and when I applied to another sense, 
 it enabled me to form a true judgment. I was misled ]>y 
 my own negligence, and not by any defect in my senses. I 
 ought, perhaps, to add that the deception in this case waa 
 aiiled by my companion, who directed my attention to the 
 door, and asked me to hand him the key that he might open 
 it. Had it not been for this circumstance, I should probably 
 have discovered the truth from the effect of binocular vision 
 It will be found that all the cases which are commonly as 
 cribed to deception of the senses are of the same character 
 as that to which I have here referred. Our senses always 
 testify truly, but we sometimes deceive ourselves by the 
 inference which we draw from their evidence. The defect 
 resides in our inference, and not in our senses, for it is by 
 the use of our senses, alone, that we are enabled to correct 
 the error into which we have fallen by our own inadver- 
 tence. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Original and acquired perceptions — Reid's Inquiry, chap 6, sec. 20— 
 23. Abercrombie, Part ii., sec. 1. 
 Improvement of the senses — Reid, Essays on the Intellectual Power« 
 
 Eisay '2, sec. 21. 
 
 BECTION X. OF THE NATURE OF THE KNOWLEDGE WHICH 
 
 WE ACQUIRE BY THE PERCEPTIVE POWERS. 
 
 Having, in the preceding sections, treated of the mannei 
 n which our knowledge of the external tvo)ld is acf][uired 
 
QUALITIES OF BODIES. 87 
 
 i propose, in the present section, to offer some suggestions 
 OEi the nature of tliis knowledge. 
 
 1. Tiie knowledge which we acquire bj pcrceptioi 
 is always of individuals. If we see several trees, we see 
 them not as a class, but as separate and distinct objects 
 of perception. If we see several men, as John, James, 
 Edward, we see each one as a distinct individual. The 
 same remark applies to the acts which we observe. We see 
 John strike James ; that is, we see a particular individual 
 perform a particular act. We thus see, that while, from 
 the knowledge gained by the perceptive faculties, we subse- 
 quently form genera and species, yet, without the aid of 
 some other powers of the mind, to form genera and species 
 would be impossible. Our several items of knowledge 
 would be like separate grains of sand, without cohesion and 
 without affinity. 
 
 2. The knowledge derived from the perceptive powers 
 is always knowledge of the concrete. When we perceive a 
 body, we do not cognize the color, figure, temperature, etc., 
 each as an abstract quality, and then afterwaids unite them 
 in one conception ; but we perceive a body, colored, of such 
 a figure and temperature ; that is, a body in which all these 
 qualities are united. The fii-st impression made upon us is 
 the cognition of an external object possessing all these 
 qualities ; or, at lea.st, so many as are cognizable by 
 the senses which are at the time directed towards them. 
 We have the power of separating these qualities, in thought, 
 the one from the other, and of making each of them a dis- 
 tinct object of attention. This, however, is the function of j i p 
 R f iculty of the mind to be treated of hereafter. ! j }\ 
 
 3. Of primary and secomlary qualities. j '' 
 It has been already stated that our knowledge is of qual- M 
 
 ities. not of essences. We do not cognize the objects arouo j 
 as absolutely, we cognize them as possessel of certain means 
 
88 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 of aflfecting us, and thus giving U3 notice of the modes of 
 their existence. 
 
 The qualities of matter have, of old, been divided int<! 
 two classes, which, at a later period, have been denominated 
 primary and secondary. The primary qualities are those 
 which, by necessity, enter into our notion of matter ; which 
 we must conceive of as belonging to body, as soon as we 
 conceive of body at all. Such are extension, divisibility, 
 magnitude, figure, solidity, and mobility. "We cannot think 
 of matter, without involving these qualities in our very 
 notion of it. If we conceive of matter as the only thing 
 created, before any sentient being was created to cognize it 
 we think of it as possessing all these qualities in as perfect 
 a manner as at present. 
 
 The secondary qualities are those which are not necessary 
 to our conception of matter as matter, yet which give it 
 the power of variously aflfecting us as sentient beings pos- 
 sessed of such or such an organism. Such are smelly 
 taste, sound, color, hardness, softness, and many others. 
 These might all be absent, or wholly unrecognized, and yet 
 our idea of matter as matter would be definite and precise. 
 They are only cognized by means of their appropriate media 
 If the media had not been created, no conception of thcL 
 could ever have been formed. We cognize them only by 
 means of our peculiar organism. Had this organism been 
 created of a different character, these qualities could never 
 have been known. Of the primary qualities themselves wo 
 form a definite idea: we know that they are what they 
 eeom to us to be. Of the secondary qualities, in themselves, 
 we know nothing more than this, that some occult cause 
 possesses the power of aflfecting us by means of our senses in 
 this or that manner, or of creating in us such or such 
 cognitions. 
 
 These secondary qualities have been, more lately, very 
 
QUALITIES OF BO JlES. 89 
 
 properly divided into two classes. First, those which we 
 (>ogQize bj their relation to our own organism : and, sec- 
 ondlj, those which we cognize by their relations to othei 
 bodies. Thus, malleability, ductility, and various othei 
 qualities, are cognized by the action of various metals on 
 each other. Gold and steel are, to our organism, equally 
 unmalleable ; that is, we can make no impression upon either 
 by voluntary effort. But when gold is brought into forcible 
 contact with steel, its quality becomes manifest. The same 
 is true of brittleness, and various other qualities. 
 
 Sir William Hamilton, after examining this subject with 
 unsurpassed acuteness. has suggested another classification of 
 the qualities of matter. It will be found, treated of in full 
 in note D to his edition of the works of Dr. Reid. To pur- 
 sue the subject at length, would be impossible within the Lmita 
 that must be assigned to the present work. I shall attempt 
 no more than to present a condensed view of some of the 
 most important elements of his classification. 
 
 Sir William Hamilton divides the qualities of matter int 
 three classes. First, primary or objective ; second, secundo- 
 primary or subjecto-objective ; and third, secondary or sub- 
 jective qualities. The primary are objective, not subjective, 
 percepts proper, not sensations proper ; the secundo-primary 
 are both objective and subjective, percepts proper and sensa- 
 tions proper; the secondary are subjective, not objective, 
 sensations proper, not percepts proper. 
 
 1. Of the primary qualities. 
 
 These are all deducible from two elementary ideas. "We 
 are unable to conceive of a body except, first, a^ occupying 
 space, and second, as contained in space. FroBC the fiist of 
 these follow, by necessary explication, extension divisibility, 
 size, density or rarity, and figure ; from the second ari 
 explicated incompressibility t.bsolute, mobility, situatioa 
 
 2. The secundo-primary. 
 
90 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 These have two phases, both immediately apprehv^nded 
 " On their primary or objective phasis. thej manifest them« 
 selves as degrees of resistance opposed to our locomotive 
 energy ; on their secondary or subjective phasis, as modes 
 of resistance, a presence affecting our sentient organism.'' 
 " Considered physically, or in an objective relation, they are 
 CO be reduced tc classes corresponding to the diffeient 
 sources in external nature, from which resistance or pressure 
 springs. These sources are three. 
 
 I. Co-attraction. II. Repulsion. III. Inertia. 
 
 From co-attraction result gravity and cohesion. 
 
 From gravity result heavy and light. 
 
 From cohesion follow, 1. Hard and soft ; 2. Firm ani 
 fluid ; 3. Viscid and friable ; 4. Tough and brittle ; 5. 
 Rigid and flexible; 6. Fissile and infissile; 7. Ductile 
 and inductile; 8. Retractile and ii retractile ; 9. Rough 
 and smooth ; 10. Slippery and tenacious. 
 
 From repulsion are evolved, 1. Compressible and incom- 
 pressible ; 2. Resilient snd irresilient. 
 
 From inei tia are evolved, Movable and Immovable. 
 
 8. The secondary qualities. 
 
 "These are not, in propriety, qualities of bodies at all. 
 As apprehended, they are only subjective affections, and 
 belong only to bodies in so far as these are supposed fur- 
 nished with the powers capable of specifically determining 
 the various parts of our nervous apparatus to the partic- 
 ular action, or rather passion, of which they are susceptible; 
 which determined action or passion is the quality of which 
 we are 'mmediately cognizant; the external concause of 
 that internal effect remaining to the perception altogether 
 unknown.'' 
 
 "Of the secondary qualities," that is. those phenomenal 
 affections determined in our sentient organism by the agency 
 of eKternal bodies, " there are various kinds; the vaiiet' 
 
QUALITIES OF BODIES. 91 
 
 principally depending on the differences of the different 
 parts of our nervous apjxiratus. Such are tht proper sensi- 
 sibles, the idiopathic aflections of our several organs of sense, 
 as color, sound, flavor, savor, and tactual sensation ; such 
 are the feelings from heat, electricity, galvanism, etc., and 
 the muscular and cutaneous sensations whicii accompany the 
 perception of the secundo-primary qualities. Such, though 
 less directly the result of foreign causes, are titillation, 
 gneczing, horripilation, shuddering, tlie feeling of what is 
 called setting the teeth on edge, etc. etc. Such, in fine, 
 ore all the various sensations of bodily pleasure and pain, 
 determined by the action of external stimuli." 
 Concerning these in general, it may be remarked, 
 
 1. " The primary are qualities, only as we conceive then^ 
 to distinguish body from not-body ; they are tlie attributes 
 of body as body, corporis ut cor/nis. The secondary and 
 secundo-primary are moi-e properly denominated qualities, 
 for they discriminate body fiom body. They are the attri- 
 butes of body, as this or that kind of body, corporis ut tale 
 corpus. ^^ 
 
 2. " The primary arise from the universal relations of 
 bod^ to itself; the secundo-primary, from the general rela- 
 tions of this body to that ; the secondary, from the special 
 relations of this kind of body to this or that kind of sentient 
 organism. 
 
 3. '' U'.der the primary we apprehend the modes of the 
 non ego ; under the secundo-primary we apprehend the 
 modes be .h of the ego and the non ego ; under the second- 
 ary we apprehend modes of the ego, and infer modes of the 
 ion ego. 
 
 4. " The primary are apprehended as they are in bodies; 
 he secondary, as they are in us ; the secundo-primary, ai 
 hoy are in bodies and as they are in us. 
 
 6. '• The terms designating primary qualities are univ(>cal 
 
V^ INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 marking out one quality ; those designating the secundo-pri 
 
 mary and secondary are equivocal, denoting botk a mode oi 
 
 existence in bodies and a mode of affection in cur organism.' 
 
 Of these qualities, in particular, considered as i.n bodies, 
 
 1. " Tlie primary are the qualities of a body in relation 
 to our organism as a body simply ; the secundo-pri msry ara 
 the qualities of a body in relation to our organism as a pro- 
 pelling, resisting, cohesive body ; the secondary are the 
 qualities of body in relation to our organism as an idiopath- 
 ically excitable and sentient body. 
 
 2. " The primary are known immediately in themselves; 
 the secundo-primary, both immediately in themselves and 
 mediately in their effects on us ; the secondary, only medi- 
 ately in their effects on us. 
 
 8. " The primary are apprehended objects ; the secondary, 
 inferred powers ; the secundo-primary, both apprehended 
 jbjects and inferred pov/ers. 
 
 4. "The primary are conceived as necessary and perceived 
 as actual ; the secundo-primary are perceived and conceive<J 
 as actual ; the secondary are inferred and conceived as pos- 
 sible. 
 
 5. "The primary may be roundly characterized as mathe- 
 matical ; the secundo-primary, as mechanical ; the secondary, 
 as physiological." 
 
 Of these qualities considered as cognitions, 
 
 1. " We are conscious as objects, in the primary qualities, 
 of the modes of the not-self; in the secondary, of the modea 
 of a self; in the secundo-primary, of the modes of a self and 
 ft not-self, at once. 
 
 2. " Using the terms strictly, the apprehensions of the 
 primary are perceptions, not sensations ; of the secondary, 
 aensatious, not perceptions ; of secundo-primary, sensationa 
 and perceptions together. 
 
 3. "In tbo primary there is thus no concomitant seconi 
 
QrALITIES OF «0i:iE3. &3 
 
 ary quality; in the secondary, no conoot^Hun* primary 
 qualitv ; in the secundo-priniarj, a secondary and q:\a3i- 
 primary quality accompany each otlier. 
 
 4. "In the apprehension of the primary, there h «.o Au^- 
 ject-cbject determined by the object-object ; in the secucdo- 
 primary, there is a subject-object determined by the object- 
 object ; in the secondary, the subject-object is the only 
 object of immediate cognition." 
 
 I have not, in the above quotations, inserted all the acute 
 and valuable distinctions of our author. I have selected 
 those only which seemed to me the most important, and 
 which discriminate most clearly the characteristic elementa 
 of these modes of cognition. For a more extended view of 
 the subject I must refer the reader to the work itself, 
 where he will find every distinction wrought out with a 
 power of metaphysical analysis which has never been sur- 
 
 In regard to Sir William's classification, if I may hazard 
 an opinion, I think that his distinctions are rendered obvi- 
 ous and beyond dispute. Whether his classification includes 
 all the secundo-primary qualities, I am by no means certain. 
 In so far as these qualities are apprehended by their eflfecta 
 on our organism, his classification appears exhaustive. But 
 what shall we say of that class of qualities which arise from 
 the relations of insentient bodies to each other, as malleabil- 
 ity, chemical afiinity, and various others 7 These are not 
 known by any impression on our organism, as a propelling, 
 resisting, cohesive body. They are not primary qualities. 
 They are not cognized by our idiopathic sentient organism. 
 They must be secundo-primary, but I think are not included 
 m our author's classification. 
 
 4. Leaving now the subject of primary and secondary qual- 
 'ttiea. I proceed to remark, that the knowledge derived froin 
 
94 INTELLECTUAl PHILOSOPnT. 
 
 perception is truly knowledge ; that is, the evidence jf oui 
 senses is worthy of belief. 
 
 Tlius, I open my eyes, and I perceive before me a book 
 I put forth my hands, and feel of it. My percf ptions per- 
 fectly coincide. Tliey both testify to the existence of an 
 external object, numerically distinct from myself, of such a 
 magnitude, form, situation. I am conscious of a state of 
 mind which I call perception; and of that state of mind one 
 of the elements is an unalterable conviction that the object 
 exists now and here, just as I perceive it. This conviction 
 is a necessary part of my state of mind, if, indeed, it bo 
 not the state of mind itself This conscious perception ia 
 to me the knowledge that this book exists. If I am asked 
 ■why I believe thus, or have this conviction, I can give no 
 other account of it than that I am so made It k a cogni- 
 tion given me in virtue of my creation. It I am asked tc 
 prove it, I must plead my inability to do so. I can prove 
 no proposition except by some other proposition of higher 
 authority. But there is no proposition of higher authority 
 than this cognition given me by my Creator, who made me 
 so ih it, under certain conditions, I cannot choose but have 
 it. If I am asked to prove that I exist, I am unable to do 
 it for the same reason, namely, that I have no more evident 
 proposition which can be 'used as a medium of proof I am 
 so made that the existence of an external world is revealed 
 to me at the same time and just as obtrusively as my own 
 existence. By the constitution of my mind, the one fact 
 is as clearly revealed to me as the other. 
 
 But this subject is capable of more extended illustration 
 and explication. 
 
 1. •• Our cognitions, it is evident, are not all at second 
 hand." Demonstration must at last rest upon propositiong 
 which carfy their own evidence, and necessitate their own 
 admission. Were it otherwise, were there no truths which 
 
Validity of percepttojt. ^5 
 
 revealed themselves to the human mind, all projf wjuld 
 je nugatory ; it would be a succession of ar^amr ctj, each 
 one resting on something yet to be proveJ. Sorae truth 
 must then be given to us in our creation aa iu'.epjgent be- 
 ings, on which we may found our reasoning, aud from which 
 all demonstration must proceed. 
 
 If it be asked, how do these prima' y cogTi'cions assure ug 
 of their truth and certify us of their ^'er.cy, tao only answer ig 
 that they are results of our mental 'X)j':,t'.tution. As soon 
 as a human mind apprehends them, T/i'.hout arguraent or 
 proof, it immediately knows them to be true. The only 
 answer we can give to him who asks us a reason of these 
 beliefs is, that we are so made, we are created to believe 
 them. To suppose thfir falsehood, is to suppose that we are 
 created thus simply in order that we may be deceived. 
 And as, besides this, it is upon these beliefs that all subse- 
 quent knowledge is founded, if we deny them, all knowl- 
 edge is a delusion, and truth and falsehood are unmeaning 
 terms. This, surely, without any proof, cannot be asserted ; 
 and, hence, I think it must be conceded that we must in the 
 first instance receive these beliefs as true, until they are 
 shown to be false, and just in so far as they are shown to be 
 false. That we do thus by the constitution of our nature 
 believe in the testimony of our senses, that we do thus uni- 
 versally admit it. is, I think, beyond controversy. It is, 
 therefore, to be believed until it is shown to be unfounded. 
 But it may possibly be denied that this belief is one of 
 those wiven us by our creation, or one of the first truths 
 reveakd to the common sense of man by virtue of his intcl- 
 Vctual constitution What, then, are the characteristics bv 
 which these truths may be known 7 
 
 Sir "W. Hamilton reduces these characteristics to the- foui 
 fbllowing : 
 
 1. They are incomprehensible. " A conviction Is in 
 
96 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 comprehensil'le when there is merely given us in conscioiis 
 ness that its object is, and when we are unable to compre« 
 Lend, through a higher notion or belief, whi/ or hotc it is. 
 " When we are able to comprehend why or how a thing is, 
 the belief of the existence of that thing is not a primary 
 datum of consciousness, but a subsumption under the condi- 
 tion or belief which affords its reason." 
 
 2. Thf"!/ are si?7iple. "It is manifest that if a cogni- 
 tion or belief be made up of, and can be explicated into, a 
 plurality of cognitions or beliefs, that, as compound, it can- 
 not be original." 
 
 3. Thei/ are necessary and imiversal " If necessary, 
 they must, of course, be universal. The necessity here 
 spoken of is of two kinds. The first kind is when we can- 
 not construe it to our minds that the deliverance of con- 
 sciousness is not true, or when the opposite of the assertion 
 is unthinkable. Thus the proposition that a part is greater 
 than the whole, or that two stiaight lines can at the same 
 time be parallel and at right angles in the same plane, is 
 unthinkable. There is another necessity, however, which 
 is not unthinkable, when the deliverance of consciousness 
 may be false, but when, at the same time, we cannot but 
 admit that it is of such or such an import. This is the case 
 in contingent truths, or what may be called matters of fact. 
 In this case, the thing is not conceived as absolutely impos- 
 sible, but impossible under the present constitution of things. 
 or we being as we are. Thus, I can theoretically suppose 
 that the external ohjeet of which I am conscious in percep- 
 tion may be in reality nothing but a mode of mind, or self. 
 I am unable, however, to think that consciousness does not 
 3'nnpel me to regard it as external, as a mode of matter or 
 not self Such being the case. I cannot practically believe 
 the supposition which I am able speculatively to maintain; 
 for I cannot believe this supposition without believing that 
 
VALIDITY OF PERCEPTION 97 
 
 she last ground of all belief is not to be believed, wliich is 
 self-contradictor J. 
 
 4. Their comparative evidence and cntabiiy. "These 
 truths are so clear and obvious that nothing more clear or 
 obvious can be conceived bj which to prove them." Ac- 
 coriing to Buffier, they " are so clear, that if we attempt to 
 pr^^ve or disprove them, this can be done only by proposi- 
 tions which are manifestly neither more evident nor more 
 certain." 
 
 Now, so far as I can perceive, all these characteristics 
 belong to the deliverance of consciousness in perception. 
 They are incomprehensible, simple, practically necessary, 
 and of such clearness of manifestation that they can neither 
 be proved nor disproved by anything more evident. We are 
 then entitled to consider them first truths, or truths revealed 
 to man in the constitution of his nature. If such deliver- 
 .nces are not to be believed, then nothing is to be believed, 
 and all knowledge is essentially impossible. 
 
 But the subject may be finally considered from another 
 point of view. 
 
 The data of consciousness may be considered as two-fold. 
 
 1. "As apprehended facts or actual manifestations." As 
 when I sa}', I see a tree, or I feel a cube, there is an actual 
 manifestation to me that I am in that particular state of 
 mind described by these words. Consciousness reveals to 
 me that fact as the present state of my mind. 
 
 2. " These deliverances of consciousness may be consid- 
 ered as testimonies to the truth of facts beyond their own 
 phenomenal reality." These acts of consciousness are the 
 testimonies to the fact tha* tLat tree and that cube are now 
 existing. It is. however, to be observed that the testimony 
 to the existence of this state jf mind, and to the existence 
 of the tree which tliis state of mind cognizes, is given ua 
 in the same act. 
 
 9 
 
•J8 INTELLECTUAL PHI10S0FH7. 
 
 The truth cf this first testimony of conscious! .ess is ad 
 inittcd by all. When consciousness testifi'js that I am now 
 in a mental state which I call perception, it cannot be 
 doubted that such is the fact. The doubt, in this case, is 
 clearly suicidal. The state of mind caJed perception is at 
 tested by consciousness. The state which I call doubting 
 is attested by the same consciousness. If, then, conscioug- 
 ness is not to be believed when it testifies to perception, 
 neither is it to be believed when it testifies to doubting. So 
 that, if a man doubts whether he is really in the state of 
 mind called perception, he must equally doubt whether he 
 is in the state of mind which he calls doubting. He musr 
 doubt whether he doubts, just as much as he doubts whethei 
 he perceives, meaning, by this term, a mere subjective act. 
 a state of the thinking subject. 
 
 There may, however, be without absurdity a doubt as to the 
 other part of the act ; that is, to the truth of this testimony 
 as to something numerically different from the subject. It 
 may be said that this is merely a subjective state of the mind 
 itself; that it is merely a form of the ego produced b_y the 
 action of some subjective cause, and that it givjs us no 
 knowledge of anything external. 
 
 To this objection it may be answered, 
 
 1. "It cannot but be acknowledged that the veracity of 
 consciousness must, at least in the first instance, be conceded. 
 Neganti i?iciimbit probatio. Nature is not gratuitously to 
 be assumed to work, not only in vain, but in counteractir-n 
 of herself. Our faculty of knowledge is not, without a 
 ground, to be supposed an instrument of illusion. Man, 
 unless tlie melancholy fact be "iroved, s not t'^ be held 
 organized for the attainment and actuated by the love of 
 truth, only to become the dupe and victim of a perfidioui 
 Creator." 
 
 2. " But, granting that these convirtiona are at the b* 
 
VALIDITY OF PERCEPTION. ;*9 
 
 pmmng to be received as true, it is yet competent tf» attempt 
 to prove them false, and thus correct an error into which 
 we have been led by our constitution. But how shall this 
 be done 7 As the ultimate grounds of knowledge, these 
 convictions cannot be redargued from any higher knowledge: 
 and as derivative beliefs they are paramount in certainty to 
 every derivative knowledge. They cannot, therefore, be 
 disproved by knowledge derived from any other source, for 
 the most certain knowledge which we possess must rest upon 
 the same foundation as the testimony of our own con- 
 sciousness." 
 
 3. " If, then, these convictions be disproved, they must 
 be disproved by themselves. This can be done only by one 
 of two methods. First, it mu.st be shown that these pri- 
 mary data are diref tly and immediately contradictory of 
 themselves." "Tbey are many, they are in authority co- 
 ordinate, and their testimony is clear and precise.' Now, 
 if this testimony is intellr ctually or in fact, at variance, then 
 we must conclude either that one or the other, or both, tes- 
 timonies are false. Or, secondly, it must be proved "that 
 they are mediately or indirectly contradictory, inasmuch 
 as the consequences to which they necessarily lead, and for 
 tiie truth or fulsehood of which they are therefore responsi- 
 ble, are repugnant. In no other way can the veracity of 
 consciousness be assailed. It will argue nothing to show 
 that they are incomprehensible, for nothing can be more 
 absurd than to make the comprehensibility of a datum of 
 consciousness, the criterion of its truth. To ask h:w an 
 immediate fact of consciousness is possible, is to ask how 
 consciousness is possible ; and to ask how consciousness ia 
 possible, is to suppose we have another consciousness above 
 and before that human consciousness concerning whose mode 
 ©f operation we inquire. Could we answer this, verily we 
 ihoold be as gods." Neither of these attempts \n\s ever been 
 
100 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 made. We may, therefore, receive the testimony of ayu 
 sciousness as true beyond the reach of argument or contra- 
 diction. 
 
 4. And, lastly, consciousness testifies to two things : first 
 that there is now existing a state of mind; and, secondly 
 that that state of mind is an actual cognition of an extewial 
 Wi^rld possessing such or such qualities. Suppose we admit 
 the first testimony; how, then, admitting this, can we reject 
 the other testimony of which it forms a part ? What dis- 
 tinction can we take between the two items of the same tes- 
 cimony, by which we can receive the one and reject the 
 .:>ther. Or, on the other hand, suppose we deny the testi- 
 mony of consciousness to the truth of the perception, how 
 can we admit it when it attests to an existing state of mind'.' 
 If the one is false, the other may be true, but it is surely 
 not to be credited. Thus the very fiicts of our subjective 
 existence would be shown to be unworthy of belief, and the 
 evidence of the existence of the ego and the non ego would 
 be s\\ept away together. 
 
 In this and the preceding article I have used the thoughts, 
 and, for the most part, the language of Sir W. Hamilton. 
 It gives me pleasure to acknowledge my obligations to a 
 gentleman, whose boundless learning in every department of 
 human knowledge, united with unrivalled acuteness and 
 rare power of examining with perfect distinctness the mi- 
 nutest shades of thought, have long since given him a posi- 
 tion among the profoundest philosophers of this or any other 
 age. 
 
 5. I close this section with a few remarks upon the law of 
 perception in its relation to evidence. This law may bo 
 stated in few words. 
 
 1. When all our faculties are in a normal state, and an 
 appropriate object is presented to an organ of sense, a sen- 
 sation or a perception immediately ensues. We cannr t by 
 
VALIDITY OF PEKt'EKi'lUN. 101 
 
 jrar will prevent it. If I open my eyes, I cannot escape the 
 Bi^^ht uf the object before me. If a sound is made, near tc 
 2ie, I cannot by my will prevent hearing it ; and the same 
 IS true of all other senses. 
 
 2. On the other hand, my faculties being in their normal 
 condition, if no object is presented to my organs of sense, 
 1 can perceive none. I cannot perceive what I will, but 
 only what is presented to me. I cannot see a tree, unless a 
 tree is before me. I cannot hear a sound, unless a sound is 
 produced within hearing ; and so of the rest. 
 
 3. Hence it follows that if, under normal conditions, I 
 am conscious of perceiving an external object, then that 
 object exists when and where I perceive it. The conscious 
 perception could exist under no other conditions. It is a 
 fact which admits of being accounted for in no other man- 
 ner. And, on the other hand, if, under normal circum- 
 stances, I perceive no object, then no object exists to be 
 perceived. 
 
 These simple laws lie at the foundation of the evidence 
 of testimony. If* we perceive an event, we know that that 
 event is transpiring. If we remember that we perceived it, 
 ■we know that it has transpired. So, if we are satisfied 
 that credible witnesses were conscious of perceiving an ob- 
 ject, we know that the object existed as perceived. If un- 
 der circumstances, such that if it were present they must 
 have perceived it, and they were conscious of no percep- 
 tion, then we know tliat the object was not present. The 
 further consideration of the conditions by which these lawa 
 are limited belongs to the science of evidence. The state- 
 ment of the law itself is all that concerns to our present 
 inquiry. 
 
 Within a few years past various statements have been 
 made which seem to modify the above laws. It has been 
 aasertod that persons, under the influence of wh'\t is called 
 9* 
 
102 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 meamerisir can be rendered perfectly unconsc joua of what 
 is passing around them; that thej are able to cognize per- 
 sons and events without the intervention of the appropriate 
 media, and unler circumstances which render it certaii. 
 that such cognitions could not have originated in the ordi 
 nary use of the organs of sense. This subject has attracte \ 
 oonsiderable attention, both in this country and in Europe. 
 Sir W. Hamilton remarks: " However astonishing, it is low 
 proved, beyond all rational doubt, that, in certain abnormal 
 states of the nervous organism, perceptions are possible 
 through other than the ordinary channels of the senses." — 
 Hamilton's Reid, page 2-16, note 2, Edinburgh edition. 
 
 It has been, I believe, proved beyond dispute, that pa- 
 tients under this influence have submitted to the most dis- 
 tressing operations without consciousness of pain ; that other 
 persons have cognized events at a great distance, and have 
 related them correctly at the time; and that persons totally 
 'blind, when in the state of mesmeric consciousness have 
 enjoyed for the time the power of perceiving external ob- 
 jects. So far as I have been inforn^ed, while these distant 
 cogtiitions are sometimes correct, they are as frequently 
 wholly erroneous, and the person is totally unable to distin- 
 guish the true from the false. The subject seems to nr.e 
 well worthy of the most searching and candid examination. 
 The facts seem to indicate some more general laws of exter- 
 nal cognition than have yet been discovered. The matter 
 is by no means deserving of ridicule, but demands the atten- 
 tion cf the most p' ilosophical inquirers. 
 
 REFEREXCES. 
 
 KnoTi ledge acquired by perception is of individuals — Locke, Book 4, 
 thap. 7, sec. 9 ; Reid, Essay 5, chap. 1. 
 
 The knowledge acquired by perception is real — Beid, Essay 2, chaps, i 
 %ad20 
 
coNCEPTroN. lOa 
 
 l»Timarj and seconAiry qualities — Locke, b)3k 2d, chap. 8, sec. 9, 10. 
 M, 24 ; Reid, Kssny -id.ch. 17 ; Cousin, ch. 6. 
 
 yir W. Hamilton, Dissertation supplementary to Reid ; note D. 
 
 Laws of Perception — Reid, Essay 2d, ch. 1, 2. 
 
 The credibility of the evidence of perception demonstrated — Sir W 
 Hamilton's Dissertation on Co' Vnon Sense. Note A, as above. 
 
 SECTION XI. — OF CONCEPTION. 
 
 The subject of conception is, in its origin, so intimately 
 ftllied to perception, that, although it enters as a constituent 
 eh;ment into almost everj act of the mind, there seems a 
 propriety in treating of it here. 
 
 The word conception has already frequently occurred in 
 the preceding pages. It is proper that it should be more 
 defii.itely explained. 
 
 Ct.nceptiou has been defined as that act of the mind in 
 which we form a notion or thought of a thing. To this, 
 however, it has been objected, that the word notion or 
 thought in this place means the same as conception, and 
 tliat we might with the same propriety reverse the defini- 
 tion, and say that the having a notion of a thing was the 
 forming a conception of it. There seems to be force in this 
 objection. Tlie fact is, that a simple act of the mind is in- 
 capable of definition. We can do no more than present the 
 circumstances under which it arises, and our own conscious- 
 ness at once teaches us what is meant. 
 
 1. To proceed in this manner, then, I would observe that 
 when I look upon a book, or any external object, I instantly 
 Term a notion of it, of a particular kind. I know it as an ex- 
 ternal body, numerically distinct from myself, of a certain 
 tvyfra color and magnitude, at this moment and in this 
 place existing before me. When I handle a book, I have th« 
 
1U4 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 same notion, the quality of color onlj excepted. Thii 
 knowledge is called perception. 
 
 2. Secondly, I find that when the object of perception ia 
 removed, and Uie act of perception ceases, a know ledge of 
 the object is still present to my mii-i. This is called a cuu- 
 ception. Thus, the book which I just now perceived is re- 
 moved, but the conception of it is still an object of con- 
 sciousness. A cube which I saw is burned to ashes, but I 
 have a distinct conception of its form and dimensions. I can 
 recall to my mind the cataract which I saw last summer, the 
 house in which I slept, or particular portions of the road over 
 which I passed. In these cases, however, the conception ia 
 not simple ; it is combined with the act of memory. I have 
 not only the conception, but the assurance or belief, that at 
 a certain time these objects actually existed as I now con- 
 ceive of them. 
 
 3. But let us now separate this act of conception from 
 the act of memory. We can conceive of a tree or a cataract 
 without connecting it with the idea either of present or 
 past existence. We are doing this continually in the course 
 of our own thoughts. We do it when we read a romance. We 
 are here continually forming images of things, places, and 
 persons, which we know never existed. So, in a geometri- 
 cal demonstration, we form for ourselves the conception of a 
 figure, and proceed to reason upon it, though we have never 
 Been it represented to the eye.* A concept or concep- 
 
 * The word conception is commonly used in two or three significations, 
 tt is employed to designate the power or faculty, the individual act of that 
 f-iculty, and that act considered as an object of thought. On this subject 
 Sir W. Hamilton remarks, " We ought to distinguish imagination and 
 image, conception and concept. Imagination am' conception ought to b| 
 employeil in speaking of the mental modification, one and indivisiole, coft 
 Bidered as an act; im.age and concept, in speaking of it, considerea t« 
 product or immediate object " — Note to page 263, 
 
CONCEPTION. lO.*) 
 
 Uon Is, therefore, that representation or cognition of a 
 thing which we form in the mind when we are thinking of 
 it. 
 
 4. A.gam, when we think of an act of the mind as thmk- 
 ing, willing, believing, or of any emotion, as joy or sorrow, 
 ire form a conception of it. We cannot think it unless wa 
 can do this. Hence, when a state of mind is spoken of which 
 we cannot represent to ourselves in thought, we say we can- 
 not conceive of it ; that is, the words spoken do not awaken 
 in us any corresponding conception. 
 
 5. Again, by the faculty of abstraction we may analyze 
 the elements of these concrete conceptions, and combine 
 them into general or abstract ideas. Thus, from several in- 
 dividual hoi-ses we form the general notion of a horse, mean- 
 ing the genus, and having respect to no individual horse 
 existing. These are general conceptions, or conceptions of 
 genera or species. 
 
 6. We have also conceptions of general intuitive truths, 
 Buch as the axioms of mathematics. We conceive of the 
 truth that the whole is greater than its part, or that if 
 equals be added to equals the wholes are equal. So we form 
 conceptions of general relations, as of cause and effect 
 power, and many others. 
 
 7. Lastly, we are able to form images by combining into 
 one whole, elements previously existing in the mind, as when 
 a painter conceives of a landscape, or of a historical group. 
 This form of conception is more properly styled imagination. 
 
 In all cases of conception where the act is completed, if I 
 do not mistake, we form something of the nature of a pic- 
 ture, which the mind contemplates as the object of thought. 
 I am aware that, in speaking and writing, when the termd 
 are perfectly familiar, we do not pause and form the con- 
 ception. Thus, we use the axioms, in demonstration, without 
 pausing to reflect upon the words we employ, and yet we 
 
106 ixtelle:tual philcsophi. 
 
 use tliem \^hh entire accuracy. Thus we speak of caogC 
 and effect, number, and various other ideas. When, how- 
 ever, Ave attempt to dwell upon any one of these ideas, sc 
 far as I can observe, we form a concept of it in the mind. 
 Thus, when I think of the term horse as a genus, and dwell 
 upon it in thought, there is before me, as an object, a con- 
 cept of such an animal. So. if I think the axiom the whol^ 
 is greater than its part, two magnitudes corresponding to 
 these terms present themselves before me. From this 
 remark, however, must be excepted those cases in which we 
 recognize a truth as a necessary condition of thought, as 
 duration, space, and ideas of a similar character. Even 
 here, however, we find the mind from its natural impulse 
 striving to realize something which shall correspond to a 
 concept. 
 
 Of conceptions thus explained it may be remarked in 
 general : 
 
 1. In conception there is nothing numerically distinct 
 from the act of the mind itself From the analogies of Ian - 
 guage we are liable to be misled in thinking of this subject. 
 We speak of forming a conception, and of forming a machine ; 
 of separating the elements of a conception, and of separating 
 the parts of an object from one another. As in the one 
 case there is some object distinct from the e^o, we are prone 
 to suppose that there must be also in the other. There is, 
 however, in conception nothing but the act of the mind 
 itself We may, nevertheless, contemplate th?s act from 
 different points of view ; first, as an act of the mind, or as 
 the mind in this particular act, and, secondly, as a product 
 of that act which we use in thinking. There is, however 
 Dumerically nothing but the act of the mind itself 
 
 2. Conception enters into all the other acts of the mind. 
 In the simplest sensation there is, for the time being, a 
 knowledge or a notion, though it may remain w^th ug nvt 9 
 
CONCEPTION 101 
 
 CQOmsnt after the object producing it is withdrawn. We 
 can have a knowledge of our own powers only as we luive 
 conceptions of them. "We can remember, cr judge, or rea- 
 son, only as we have conceptions. In fact, all our menta. 
 processes are about conceptions. Of them, all our knowl- 
 edge consists. 
 
 3. Our conceptions are to us the measure of possibility 
 When any proposition cannot be conceived, that is, is un- 
 thinkable, we declare it impossible or absurd. Thus, if n 
 be said that a part is greater than the whole, that two 
 straigh* lines can enclose space, or that a change can take 
 place in a body while all the conditions of its existence re- 
 main absolutely the same, I undei^tand the assertion ; but 
 when I attempt to form a conception of it, that is, to thinK 
 it. I find myself unable to do so. I affirm it to be impos- 
 sible. On the other hand, I may think of a communication 
 between the earth and the moon. In the present state of 
 science it is impracticable, but it is within the limits of 
 thought, and my mind is not so organized that I feel it to 
 oe impossible. This case, is, however, to be distinguishea 
 from the unconditional, the incomprehensible. This, from 
 the nature of our intellect, we know to be necessary ; it is 
 not contradictory to thought, though to grasp the concep- 
 tion is imjtossible. In the other case we are able to com- 
 prehend the terms, but we are unable to construe them in 
 thought : in other words, the relation which is affirmed ia 
 unthinkable. 
 
 4. In simple conception, or where it is unattended by 
 any other act of the mind, there is neither truth nor false 
 hood. I may conceive of a red mountain, of a blue rose, of 
 A winged horse, but the conception has nothing to do with 
 my belief in the existence of either of these objects. If the 
 ■jonception is united with an act of judgment or memory 
 Oien it at once becomes either true r false. In the conceiv 
 
108 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 tion itself, however, I can discover neither. Stewart, 1 
 know, advances a contrary opinion ; but 1 must confess my- 
 self wholly unconvinced by his reasoning. 
 
 5. Conceptions may be either clear and distinct, or obscure 
 and indistinct. We easily observe the difference here spoken 
 of in the effects produced on us by different descriptions. 
 Some authors describe a scene with so graphic a power that we 
 at once form a conception as definite as though we had our- 
 selves beheld it. Others use emphatic and imposing lan- 
 guage, but they leave on us no distinct impression. Wc 
 are deluged by a shower of words, but no conception is 
 imprinted on the memory. 
 
 6. Conceptions may be strong and vivid, or faint and 
 languid. The same scene may with equal faithfulness be 
 described to us by two persons. The one deeply affects us, 
 while the other hardly interests us sufficiently to command 
 our continued attention. We observe the same effect in 
 ourselves, resulting from the accident;al tone of our own minda. 
 At some times we find our conceptions much stronger than 
 at others, under precisely the same external circumstances. 
 
 From what has been observed, it will readily appear that 
 the power of forming conceptions differs greatly in differ- 
 ent individuals. Every teacher must have remarked this 
 fact, in his attempts to communicate instruction. Some per- 
 sons will at once seize upon the salient points of a concep- 
 tion, discover its bearing and relations, and hold it steadily 
 before the mind, until it becomes incorporated with their 
 knowledge. They never can be satisfied until they have 
 attained to this result. Others require repeated explana- 
 tions, and, when they suppose themselves to have mastere'J 
 a conception, we are surpi-ised to observe that no important 
 point seems to have arrested Uieir attention, but that there 
 rest on their minds only considerations of inferior impor 
 tanco blended together in dim and uncertain confusion. 
 
CONCEPTION. 10& 
 
 The differeno3, in this respect, is still more remarkable it 
 the connection of conception with the fine arts, though per- 
 haps this exercise of the power belongs rather to the imngi- 
 nation. A portrait-painter will form so distinct a concep- 
 tion of a countenance tlat, years afterward, he will lepro- 
 aent it correctly on canvas. The same power f forming 
 distinct conceptions is essenuai to the poet or novelist. No 
 one can read the descriptions of Sir Waller Scott without 
 being sensible of his high endowment in this respect. Kor 
 was this power limited to the scenes which he himself had 
 witnessed. His description of a summer day in the deserts 
 of Syria could not have been surpassed by the most gifted 
 Bedouin Arab. It was to this power that he owed much 
 of that brilliant conversational eminence, which rendered 
 him the centre of attraction in every circle in which he 
 chose to unbend himself. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Conception — Reid, Essay 1, chap. 1 
 
 Formed at will — Reid, Essay 4, chap. 1. 
 
 Enter into every other act of the iniud — Reid, Essay 4, chap 1. 
 
 Neither true nor false — Reid, Essay 4, chap. 1. 
 
 Ingredients derived from other powers — Reid, Essay 4, chap. 1. 
 
 Analogy between painting and conception — Reid, Essay 4, chap. I 
 Conception in general — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 3. 
 
 Attended with belief — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 3. 
 
 Power of description depends on — Stewart, vol. L, chap. 3. 
 
 Improved by habit — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 3. 
 Conception — Abercrombie, Part 3, sect. 1. 
 
 Clear or obscure — Abercrombie, Part 3, sect. 1. 
 In conception neither truth nor falsehood — Lock* Pook 2d, chap 2S 
 mxts. 1—4, 19, 20. 
 Clear or obscui • — Locke, Book 2, ch 29, sect. 1 
 
 10 
 
CHAPTER II. 
 
 OONSC10,7S>5ESS, ATTENTION, AND REFLECTIOW. 
 
 SECTION I. CONSCIOUSNESS. 
 
 Consciousness is that condition of the mind in which i) 
 is cognizant of its own operations. It is not thinking and 
 feeling, but that condition in which we know that we think 
 or feel. Thought, however, is necessary to consciousness 
 for unless thought existed, we could not be conscious of it. 
 We may nevertheless suppose a mental act to be performed 
 of which we have no consciousness. In such a case we 
 should have no knowledge of its present existence, and 
 should only know that it had existed by its results. 
 
 On this subject, however, a considerable diversity of opin- 
 ion obtains Sir W. Hamilton and many philosophers of 
 the highest authority believe that consciousness cannot prop- 
 erly be separated from the act to whose existence it tes- 
 tifies, and that to make a distinction between the assertions, 
 'I perceive" and "I am conscious of perception," is im- 
 p'xssible. They hold that -vxhen we are not conscious of an 
 act, the act is not performed ; and that when consciousness 
 does not testify to anything, it is because there is nothing 
 concerning which it can testify. 
 
 In answer to this, it may be granted tliat when it is said 
 " I perceive," the meaning is the same as when I say '•* 
 am conscious cf perceiving." When I say '* I perceive,' 
 
CONSCIOUSNESS. Ill 
 
 there is involved, by necessity, in this assertion, tne evi- 
 dence of consciousness. The question still returns. Is there 
 a state of mind which involves perception, of which we are 
 not conscious, and which is not expressed by the words " 1 
 am conscious that I perceive' 7 
 
 Let us, then, proceed to examine the facts A perscE mny 
 be engaged in reading, or in earnest thought, and a chxk 
 may strike within a few feet of him without arresting hia 
 attention. He will not know that it has struck. Let, now 
 another person ask him, within a few seconds, if tbe clock 
 has struck, and he will be conscious of a more or less dis- 
 tinct impression that he has just heard it; and, turning tc 
 observe the dial-plate, finds such to have been the fact. 
 \Vh;>t, now, was his state of mind previous to the Question 1 
 Had there not been a perception of which he was not con 
 ecions 7 
 
 But we may take a much stronger case. While a person 
 is reading aloud to another, some train of thought fi-equent- 
 ly arrests his attention. He, however, continues to read, 
 until his opinion is requested concerning some sentiment of 
 the author. He is unpleasantly startled by the reflection 
 ihat he has not the remotest conception of what he has been 
 reading about. He remembers perfecily well up to a cer- 
 tain point, but beyond this point he is as ignorant of the 
 book as if he had never seen it. Wiiat, then, was the state of 
 his mind while he was reading ? He looked upon the page. 
 He must have seen every letter, for he enunciated every 
 word, and observed every pause correctly. No one had a 
 suspicion that he did not cognize the thoughts which he 
 was enunciating to others. Yet, the moment afterwards, he 
 has not the least knowledge either of the words or the ideas. 
 Can we say that thfre was no perception here ? Could a 
 man read a sentence aloud without perceiving the words m 
 which it was wntten? Yet. so far as we can discover this 
 state of mind was unattended by corcciousness. 
 
112 IXTELLECTUAi. PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Another case of a very striking character, was related t« 
 me hy the persson to whom it refers. A few years sinc«, 
 while in London. I became acquainted with a gentleman 
 who had, for many years, held the responsible office of short- 
 hand writer to the House of Lords. In conversation one 
 day, he mentioned to me the following occurrence. Some 
 time during the last war with France, ho was engaged in 
 taking minutes of evidence in a court of inquiry respecting 
 the Walcheren expedition. In this duty he was incessantly 
 engaged from four o'clock in the afternoon until four o'clock 
 the ne.\t morning. At two o'clock in the morning he waa 
 aroused from a state of unconsciousness by Sir James E., one 
 of the members of the court, who asked him to read the min- 
 utes of the evidence of the last witness. It was the testimony 
 of one of the general officers who had described the fortifica- 
 tions of Flushing. My friend, ^Ir. G., replied, with some em- 
 barrassment, "I fear I have not got it all." "Never mind,'" 
 replied the officer, " begin, and we will help you out." The 
 evidence consisted of two pages of short-hand, and Mr. G 
 read it to the close. He remembered it all perfectly ex- 
 cepting the last four lines, of which he had no recollection 
 whatever. These last lines were, however, written as legibly 
 as the rest, and he read them without difficulty. When he 
 came to the end, he turned to General E., saying, " Sii 
 James, that is all I have." " That," replied the other, " is 
 all there is ; you have the whole of it perfectly." He had 
 reported the evidence with entire accuracy up to the very 
 moment when he was called upon to read, and yet the last 
 four lines had been written, and written in short-hand, sc 
 far as he knew, during a period of perfect unconsciousness. 
 
 The condition of the mind which we term derangement 
 conveys some instruction on this subject. Here, it is not 
 uncommon for the patient to suppose that he is not the per- 
 son speaking or acting, but soire other and that some othe) 
 
vONSCIOUSNESS ll? 
 
 mini than his c^.n is occupymg his body and performing 
 the intellectual operations, of which he is conscious. Thus. 
 Pinel mentions the case of a man in France who imagined 
 that he had been sentenced to death and guillotined ; but 
 that, after his execution, the judges reversed their decision, 
 and ordered his head to be replaced ; the executioner re- 
 placed the wrong head, and hence he was ever after think- 
 ing the thoughts of another man instead of his own. We 
 have said that consciousness is that condition of the mind 
 in which it becomes cognizant of its own operations ; that 
 is, we are cogniaint, not only that certain intellectual opera- 
 tions are carried on, but that they are our own. In this 
 case of deranged consciousness, the individual was aware 
 that there were thoughts, desires, remembrances, &c., going 
 on w ithin him, but he could not recognize them as the opera- 
 tions of his own mind. 
 
 These cases would seem to show that a distinction may 
 fairly be made between consciousness and the faculties to tiie 
 operation of which it testifies. Yet it would scarcely seem 
 proper to denominate it a faculty ; I prefer to call it a con- 
 dition of the mind. 
 
 Such being the nature of consciousness, it is of course 
 unnecessary to specify the various kinds of knowledge which 
 we cognize by means of it. If it be the condition neces- 
 sary to the cognition of our mental operations, then all 
 forms of thought are made known to us through this 
 medium. Hence, as I have before suggested, to say I 
 know, and to say I am conscious of knowing, mean the same 
 thing : since the one caimot be true without involving the 
 other. 
 
 Consciousness always has respect to the state of the mind 
 
 tself, and not to anything external. We are not conscious 
 
 of a tree, but conscious that we perceive the tree. We may 
 
 be conscious of hearing a .S')und ; we are not conscious of a 
 
 10* 
 
114 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Bountl. Those writers who deny the existence of consck)u» 
 ness as a condition distinguisha')le from the act to which ii 
 testifies, of course, adopt a different form of expression. 
 Thej would say that I am conscious of a tree, or of a 
 Bound, assuming that perception in all its varieties is but so 
 roanj' forms of consciousness. I have no desire to enter 
 Uf on d further discussion of this subject. So far, however, 
 as I am able to observe the operations of my own mind, 1 
 am constrained to believe that the form of expression which 
 I have used represents my act in perception more accurately 
 than the other. 
 
 Consciousness has respect to the present, never to the 
 past. We can be conscious of nothing that does not exist 
 now and here. We may be conscious that we now remem 
 ber the sunset of yesterday, but we cannot now be conscious 
 of the perception of the sunset of yesterday. We may be 
 conscious that we remember the appeai-ance of an absent 
 friend, but we cannot be conscious of the appearance of an 
 absent friend. 
 
 In the normal condition of the mind, consciousness, with- 
 out any effort of the will, is always in exercise, and is 
 always bearing witness to the existence of our own mental 
 acts. It may be turned off" involuntarily from the object 
 directly before us to some other, but, during our waking 
 hours, it always bears witness to something. Hence, con- 
 sciousness, united with memory, gives rise to the conviction 
 of personal identity. We know by means of this fixculty 
 that certain thoughts and feelings exist, and that they are 
 the thoughts and feelings of the being whom I denominate 
 [, myself Memory connects these various testimonies of 
 consciousness into a connected series, and thus we kno^v that 
 Dur intellectual acts, from our earliest recollection, proceed 
 from the same being, and not another. I thus know that 
 die thoughts and feelings which I repiember to have hc&k 
 
CONSCIOUSNESS 115 
 
 fionscious of yesterday are the thoughts and feelings of thfl 
 same being who is conscious of other intellectual acta 
 to day; that is, tliat through all the changes of the present 
 Btiite, the ego, myself, is the same individual and rontinuou? 
 subject. 
 
 Tlierc have been observed occasionally abnormal casea 
 of what may be termed double consciousness. In such a 
 case, the present existence of the individual is at one time 
 connected with one period of his life, and at another time 
 with another. A young woman in Springfield, Mass , some 
 years since, was affected in this manner. She was at first 
 subject to attacks of what appeared to be ordinary somnam- 
 bulism. These were then transferred from the night to the 
 tlay-time, and during their continuance her powers of per- 
 ception were in a strange manner modified. With her eyes 
 thickly bandaged, in a dark room, she could read the finest 
 print. She was removed to the hospital for the insane at 
 Worcester, in oider to be under the care of the late Dr. 
 Woodward. Here it was immediately observed that her 
 noi-mal and abnormal states represented two conditions of 
 consciousness. Whatever she leained in the abnormal state 
 wa^ entirely forgotten as soon as she passed fiom this state 
 to the other, but was perfectly remembered as soon as the 
 abnormal state returned. Thus she was taught to play 
 backgammon in both states. What she leai-nod in the ab- 
 normal state was entirely disconnected from v hat she learned 
 in her natural state, and vice versa. The acquisition made 
 in one state was lost as soon as she entered the other : and 
 it was remarked that she learned more rapidly in the abnor- 
 mal than in the normal state. The first symptom of her 
 recovery was the blending togetlier of the knowledge 
 acquired in these separate conditions. As the cure ad- 
 vanced, they became more and more identified, until tha 
 testimony of consciousness became uninterrupted and thea 
 
116 INTELLECTUAL PHlLOSOPtr. 
 
 the abnormal state vanished altogether. Several cases are 
 also on record in which persns have been subject to this 
 double consciousness without any manifestation of soranam • 
 bulism. In such instances, the individual has suddenly 
 awaked to a recollection of his former life, with the excep- 
 tion of a portion immediately preceding, of which he has na 
 recollection. A p'riod of his existence seems perfectly 
 parenthetical, and h.s present consciousness connects itseK 
 only with that portion ©f his life which preceded the change 
 in his condition. This peculiar affection will be best illus- 
 trated by an example. A few years since, a theoVgical 
 student, represented to be a person of unexceptionable char- 
 acter, was suddenly missing from a city in the interior of 
 New York. All search for him was fruitless, and he was 
 supposed to have been murdered. A few months afterwards, 
 his friends received a letter from him, dated Liverpool, 
 England. He stated that a short time before, he had found 
 himself on board of a vessel bound from Montreal to Liver- 
 pool, without the least knowledge of the manner in which 
 he came there. He recollected nothing from the time of 
 his being in the city where he had last been seen by his 
 friends. He however learned from his fellow-passengers^ 
 that he had embarked on board the vessel at Montreal, — and 
 he must have walked about two hundred miles in order to 
 arrive there, — that he sometimes seemed peculiar on the 
 passage, but that there had been nothing in his conduct to 
 excite particular remark. 
 
 Consciousness suggests to us the notion of existence. 
 When we are conscious of a sensation there immediately 
 springs from it the idea of self-existence. The conscious- 
 ness of a perception suggests the idea of the existetce both 
 of the object perceived, of the subject perceiving, and fre- 
 quently of some particular condition of that subject. Thus 
 tuppose 1 am looking upon a waterfall. I arn conftcic la of 
 
CONrfCIOrSNESS. Ill 
 
 rognizing an external object ; I am conscious of the state 
 of mind called percept'on, and I am conscious of the emotion 
 of beauty or sublimity occasioned by the object which 1 
 perceive. 
 
 It is obviously in our power to contemplate at will either 
 of these objects of thought. I may direct my attention tc 
 the external object, or to the internal mental act. or to the 
 emotion which the object occasions. Thus, in the instance 
 just mentioned, I may direct my whole power of thought to 
 the observation of the waterfall. I may examine it so care- 
 fully and minutely, that its image is fixed in my remem- 
 brance forever. Or, on the other hand, I may turn my 
 attention to my own intellectual state, and analyze the 
 nature of the act of perception. Or, still more, after 
 having become deeply impressed with the external object. I 
 may contemplate my own emotions, and, fullowing the train 
 of thought which they awaken, may lose all consciousness 
 of the perception of the object, wholly absorbed in the sen- 
 sibilities which it has called into action. We may do either 
 of these in any particular instance. "We may from natural 
 bias, or from the circumstances of education, form the habit 
 of pursuing either the one or the other of these trains of 
 thought. 
 
 Hence arises the distinction between objective and sub- 
 jective writers. The objective writer describes with graphic 
 power the appearances of external nature, the march of 
 pageants, the shock of battles, and whatever addresses itself 
 to the perceptive powers. This habit of mind is also of 
 special importance in all the researches of physical science 
 The subjective writer turns his thoughts inward, and either 
 as a metaphysician, analyzes his crn m.ental phenomena, 
 or pours forth in the language of poetry the emotions of 
 his soul. Thomson and Scott, especially the latter, ar« 
 eminently objective. Young and Byron are ecpiilly eul> 
 
118 IXTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHf. 
 
 jective No one can compare a canto of tht Ladj of th« 
 Lake ^\ih a canto of Childe Harold, or -with one of 
 Young's Night Thoughts, without observing the difference 
 which I am here attempting to illustrate. 
 
 It is, however, obvious that no writer can be either wholly 
 objective or whollj subjective. Were two writers wholly 
 objective, their representations of external nature would be 
 exactly alike. But how dissimilar are the most objective 
 passjiges of Scott. Thomson and Moore ! Each one tinges 
 every description with the hues of his own subjectivity. 
 Nor, on thj other hand, can the most subjective writer be 
 wholly subjective. He needs some objective starting-point, 
 and he will choose it in conformity with the peculiar bias of 
 his mind, and pursue that line of thought which best har- 
 monizes with his general temperament. Thus Young com- 
 mences a train of subjective reflection by reference to an 
 external object. 
 
 " The bell strikes one ! We take no note of time 
 But by its loss. To give it then a tongue 
 Is wise in man. As if an angel spoke, 
 I fee] the solemn sound ! If heard aright, 
 It is the knell of my departed hours." 
 
 Minds of the very highest endowment have the objective 
 and the subjective equally at their command. Not only the 
 descriptions of Shakspeare and Milton, but their delinea- 
 tions of human emotion, are the theme of universal eulogy. 
 And we may also remark that for its power over the human 
 heart genius depends less upon the circumstances by which 
 it is surrounded, than upon its own inherent energies. 
 Cowper has so described the bogs and fens of Olney, that 
 ve seem to have been contemplating a picturesijue land- 
 scnpe ; and " ihe turning up of a mouse's nest with the 
 plough " is reflected back in images of afl'ecting loveliness 
 from the bosom of Burns. 
 
ATTENTION AND REFLECTION. 11^ 
 
 SECTION TI. — ATTENTION AND REFLECTION. 
 
 I HAVE remarked in the previous section that conscious- 
 aesSj in the ordinary states of the mind, is involuntary. Wc 
 are sensible of no effort of the will when we either observe 
 the objects around us, or are conscious of the mental changea 
 taking place within us. I have also above alluded to the 
 fact that we may make either the object perceived, or the 
 state of the perceiving subject, an object of thought. 
 
 But, besides this, our consciousness may be accompanied 
 by an act of the will. We may, for instance, will to ex- 
 imine,with the greatest possible care, an object of percep- 
 tion, as a mineral, or a flower, or some paiticular woi'k of 
 art. Excluding every other object of thought, the effort of 
 the mind is concentrated upon the act of perception. We 
 thus may discover qualities which we never before perceived. 
 But in what respect does this stute of mind differ from ordi- 
 nary consciousness 7 The effort of the will cannot change 
 the image formed on tlie retina ; for it can exert no influence 
 whatever on the laws of light to which this imago is sub- 
 jected. It must consist in a more intense consciousness, by 
 which every impression made on the organ of sense id 
 brought more directly before the mind. Our perception 
 is excited and directed by an act of the will. This condi- 
 tion of mind, when directed to an external object, is properly 
 called Attention. 
 
 The difference between consciousness and attention may^ 
 I think, be easily illustrated. In \ assing through a streei, 
 we are conscious of perceiving every house within the range 
 of our vision. But let us now come to a row of buildings, 
 aii3 of which we desire to find, and which has been pre- 
 viously described to us. We exnnune erery one of these 
 houses earnestly and minutely. We can, if it be necessary 
 
!20 IKTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 lescribe every cue of them with accuracy, while of the 
 Dthers which we have passed in our walk we can give nc 
 iccount whatever. We say that we have observed every 
 house in that row attentively, but that on the others we 
 bestowed no attention. Or, to take a too common instance ; 
 we read a book carelessly, we see every letter and form a 
 conception of every sentence ; but all is done listlessly, and 
 we close the book hardly aware of a single idea that we 
 iiave gained while we have been thus occupied. Let, how- 
 ever, our whole mental eSbrt be directed to the subject on 
 which we are reading, and we fix it in our recollection, and 
 we can, at will, recall it and make it a matter of thought. 
 We say of ourselves, that in the foi-mer case we read with- 
 out and in the latter case with attention. 
 
 We sometimes, I think, speak of attention as practically 
 distinguished from every other act of the mind. Thus, 
 suppose we are striving to catch an indistinct sound that is 
 occurring at intervals, we then listen with attention. We 
 say to another person, " Give all your attention that is pos- 
 sible, and you may hear it." lie may possibly reply, "I 
 am all attention." Here we seem to recognize the condition 
 Df attention directed to no present object of perception, bu 
 jve merely place ourselves in a condition to perceive any 
 jbject wliich presents itself. 
 
 Sometimes the object to whi'^h our thought is directed is 
 internal ; that is, it is some state of the mind itself Oidi- 
 Dary consciousness testifies to the existence of these stater 
 without any act of the will ; nay, it is not in the power of 
 the will to arrest this continuous testimony. But we some- 
 '.imes desire to consider some particular mental state, as the 
 ;t of perception or memory ; or some emotion as that of 
 dike beautiful or sublime. It is in the power of the will tc 
 detain such mental state, and hold it up before us as an 
 •bject of thought. When, by volition, we make our owr 
 
ATTENTION AND KKFLECTION. 121 
 
 mental states objects of observation, we denominate this act 
 Itejlection. As the etymology of the word indicates, we 
 tuin the mind backwards upon itself, so that it contemplates 
 its own states and operations, very much as in the case of 
 attention it concentrates its effort upon objects of percep- 
 tion. 
 
 I do not pretend that the words attention and reflection 
 arc always used in this restiicted sense. Attention is fre- 
 quently used to designate voluntary consciousness both ob- 
 jective and subjective. Reflection is not so commonly used 
 to denote both mental states. It has, however, seemed to 
 me that these mental states should be designated by different 
 terms, and that the etymology of the two words, as well as 
 the general current of good use, tends in the direction 
 which I have here indicated. 
 
 This general power of rendering the various faculties of 
 the mind obedient to the will is of the greatest possible 
 importance to the student. Without it, he can never em- 
 ploy any power of the mind with energy or effect. Until 
 it be acquired, our faculties, however brilliant, remain 
 undisciplined and comparatively useless. From the want of 
 It, many men, who in youth give, as is supposed, great 
 promise of distinction, with advancing years sink down into 
 hopeless obscurity. Endowed with fertility of imagination 
 and unusual power of language, they are able to follow any 
 train of thought that accident may suggest, and clothe the 
 ideas of others with imagery which seems to indicate ovw- 
 inal pDwer of scientific research. But the time soon arrives 
 when the exigences of life require accuracy of knowledge, 
 soundness of judgment, and well-placed reliance on the 
 decisions of our own intellect. The time for display has 
 passevl. and the time for action — action on which our success 
 or failure depends — has come. Such men. then, after per- 
 haps dazzling the circle of their friends with a few wild and 
 11 
 
122 IXTELLECTUAL PHrLOSOPHT. 
 
 taiicifui scnemes, which gleam at intervals ami.l the »p« 
 preaching darkness, sink below the horizon, and are seei^ no 
 more forever. 
 
 One of the greatest advantages derived from early and 
 systematic education is found in the necessity which it 
 imposes of learning thoroughly and at stated periods certain 
 appropriate lessons. We are thus obliged to direct our 
 attention for a time to the earnest pursuit of some object. 
 By being placed under this necessity for a few years, the 
 power of the will over the faculties, if we are faithful to 
 ourselves, becomes habitual. What we learn is of impor- 
 tance, but this importance is secondary to that of so culti- 
 vating and disciplining our faculties that we are ever after- 
 wards able to use them in enlarging the boundaries of 
 science, or directing the courses of human thought and 
 action. If a system of education, besides cultivating the 
 habit of attention, cultivates also the habit of reflection and 
 generalization, so that the student learns not only to acquire 
 but from his acquisitions to rise to general principles, ob- 
 serve the operations of his own mind, and compare what \ a 
 has learned with the instinctive teachings of his own under- 
 standing, the great object of the instructor will be success- 
 fully accomplished. 
 
 To acquire habits of earnest and continued attention and 
 reflection, is one of the most difficult tasks of the student. 
 At the beginning, he finds his mind wandering, his atten- 
 tion easily turned aside from the object to which he wouM 
 direct it, and disposed to yield to the attraction of external 
 objects, or to seize upon every fancy that the memory or 
 the imagination may present. Much of that time is thus 
 spent in dreamy idleness, which he had really determined 
 to employ in laborious study. It is evident that his success 
 Snust depend wholly on the correction of these habits. Our 
 nainds are comparatively useless to us, unless we can render 
 
ATTENTION 4:ND REFLECIIOX 123 
 
 ihem o^jdicnt servants to the will, so that, at anj time and 
 under any circumstances, we can oblige them to think of 
 what -.ve wish, as long as we wish, and thou dismiss it and 
 think of something else. We should strive to attain such a 
 command of all our faculties that we can direct our whole 
 mental energies upon the most abstruse proposition, until 
 we have either solved it, or ascertained that, with our pres- 
 ent advantages, a solution is impossible. 
 
 Perhaps the section cannot be more profitably closed 
 than by the suggestion of some means by which the power 
 of cho will over the other faculties may be increased. 
 
 ] . Much depends upon the condition of the physical sys- 
 tem. ( )ur intellectual faculties are in more perfect exercise 
 in health than in sickness, and as the condition of the body 
 tends to sickness our power over them is proportionally^ 
 diminished. Every one knows how difficult it is to command 
 his attention during a paroxysm of fever. In recovering from 
 illness, one of the first symptoms of convalescence is a return 
 of the power over the mind, and a disposition to employ it in 
 it« accustomed pursuits. Now, it is obvious that anything 
 which interferes with the normal condition of the system, 
 during the continuance of its action, produces the same 
 efipct as temporary indisposition. Such causes are over- 
 fef^ini:, either occasionally or habitually, the use of indiges- 
 tible food, the want of sleep, or of exercise, undue mental 
 excitement, or excesiv fatigue. Every one in the least 
 attentive to this subject must have v^bserved the effect of 
 some or all of these causes upon his power of mental con- 
 ceiitraiion. A large portion of the life of many men is 
 ep<^ut in habitual violation of the laws by which the free use 
 of the mmd is conditioned. If, by accident, they foi a 
 short time obey the laws of their nature, their intellectual 
 powftrs recover their tone, and they enjoy what they call a 
 lucid interval. They postpone all important mental laboi 
 
1 2-4 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Qntil this favored period arrives, without ever suspecting 
 that it is owing to their own follj that they are not in this 
 condition continually. Our Creator manifestly intended 
 that our intellectual light should shine with a clear and steady 
 brilliancy, not that it should gleam out occasionally, after 
 long periods of mist and gloom and darkness. But. if we 
 would obtain the power of using our intellect to the greatest 
 advantage, we must habitually obey those laws which have 
 been imposed upon us by our Creator. 
 
 The diet of a student should be light, and rather spare 
 than abundant. A laboring man needs nutritious and 
 abundant food, to supply the waste caused by physical exer- 
 tion. The diet which is indispensable to the one is exceed- 
 ingly injurious to the other. A student also requires reg- 
 ular and sufficient daily exercise, which should generally be 
 carried to the point of full perspiration. His sleep should 
 be all that health requires, and he should invariably retire 
 at an early hour. His study and sleeping room should be 
 well ventilated, and his ablutions should be daily and 
 abundant. To specify more minutely in detail the treat- 
 ment of the physical system, would be out of place here ; 
 and, besides, no rules which could be given would be appli- 
 cable to every case. Every man, observing the laws of the 
 human constitution, shoulr" apply them honestly to his own 
 case. All that is required is that the student form all hia 
 physical habits with the direct and earnest purpose of giv- 
 ing the freest scope and the most active exercise to all hia 
 litellectual faculties. 
 
 It is. however, the fact that students are liable to err in 
 almost all of these particulars. They pay no attention 
 either to the quantity or quality of their food. Though, 
 perhaps, in early life, accustomed to labor, as soon as they 
 commence a course of study, they forsake, not only labor 
 but all niannci of exercise. If anxious to improve, thef 
 
ATTENTION AN1» REFLECTION lliA 
 
 Mudj until late at night, thus destroying the power of ap- 
 plication for the following day. They live in heated and 
 ill-ventilated rooms. Measuring their progress by the num- 
 ber of hours employed in study, they remain over their 
 books until the power of attention is exhausted. Much cf 
 their time is thus spent in ineffectual efforts to comprehend 
 the proposition before them, or, after they have compre- 
 hended it, in equally ineffectual attempts to fix it in their 
 recollection. The result of all this it is painful to contem- 
 plate. Broken down in health and enfeebled in mind, the 
 man in early life is turned out upon society a confirmed and 
 mediocre invalid, aqually unfitted for the habits either of 
 active or sedentary life. This is surely unfortunate. There 
 can be no good reason why a student, or the practitioner of 
 what are called the professions, should be an invalid. To 
 study, violntes no moral or physical law. A student may, 
 then, be is healthy in body and vigorous in mind as any 
 other man. If he be not, his misfortune is the result, not 
 01 mere mental application, but of the violation of the laws 
 under which he has been created. 
 
 2. I have already intimated that the power of prolonged 
 and earnest attention depends upon the will. But we find 
 that until the mind becomes in some manner disciplined, the 
 influence of the will is feeble and irregular. Of course, 
 our first attempt must be to increase the power of the will 
 over the other intellectual faculties. 
 
 Here, however, I am aware that proDwdy great differ- 
 ences exist in mental constitution. The will in some men 
 is by nature stronger than in otliers. Some men surrender 
 a deliberately-formed purpose at the appearance of a trifling 
 obstacle ; others cling to it with a tenacity which nothing 
 but death can overcome. In this latter case, every physical 
 and mental energy is consecrated to the accomplishment of 
 the purpose to which the life of the being is devoted. Wheo 
 11* 
 
126 Intellectual philosophy. 
 
 sach a will, moved by high moral principle ind giiided by 
 sound judgment, is directed to the accom])lishment of a 
 great enterprise, it wins for its possessor a name among the 
 benefactors of the race. John Howard was an ilhistrious 
 example of this class of men. The most masterly delinea- 
 tion of this form of character found, so far as I know, in 
 any language, is contained in John Foster's Essays ; a book 
 which I should fail in my duty did I not recommend to the 
 thouglitful perusal of every young man. 
 
 Such instances of energetic will are, however, rare, and 
 it becomes us to inquire whether the control over our facul- 
 ties can be obtained by those who are less happily consti- 
 tuted. The most important means of cultivation, if wo 
 desire to improve ourselves, lies in the will itself. The more 
 constantly we exercise it, the greater does its power become. 
 The more habitually we do what we resolve to do, instead of 
 doing what we arc solicited to do by indolence, or appetite, 
 or passion, or the love of trifles, the more readily will our 
 faculties obey us. At first the effort may yield only a partial 
 result, but perseverance will render tlie result more and 
 more apparent, until at last we shall find ourselves able to 
 cmph)y our faculties in such manner as we desire. If, then, 
 the student finds his mind unstable, ready to wander in 
 search of every other object than that directly before him, 
 let him never yield to its solicitations. If it stray from the 
 sulyect, let him recall it, resolutely determining that it shall 
 do the work that he bids it. He who will thus faithfully 
 deal with his intellectual faculties will soon find that his 
 labor has not been in vain. 
 
 But, in order to arrive at this result, we must be thor- 
 oughly in earnest, and willing to pay the price for so inval- 
 uable an acquisition. We must forego many a sensual 
 pleasure, that the action of our faculties may be fiee and 
 unembarrassed. "We must -esolutely resist all tendHnciy» 
 
ATTENTION AND REFLECTION. 127 
 
 to indolence, both physical and mental. We must learn t4 
 be alone. We mjst put aAvaj from us all reading and all 
 conversation that would encourage the tendencies which we 
 wish to suppress. By doing this, and exerting to the full 
 the present power of our will, we cannot fail to make pi og- 
 ress in mental discipline. 
 
 It may not be improper to add a remark respecting a kind 
 of reading in which a student is, at the present day, strongly 
 tempted to indulge. I have no disposition here to discusa 
 the advantages and disadvantages of the reading of w^orks 
 of fiction. It is sufficient for my purpose to observe, first, 
 that this kind of mental occupation evidently requires no 
 eSoYt of the will to arrest the attention. Tlie mind follows 
 pleasantly and unconsciously the train of conceptions pre- 
 sented by the author. Disquisitions requiring mental effort are 
 always considered blemishes in a romance, and are, I believe, 
 generally passed over unread. And, secondly, the mind be- 
 comes filled with interesting and exciting images, which 
 remain Avith us long after the reading has been finished. 
 From these causes, reading of this character must enfeeble 
 the A^ill, and create a tendency to wander from a course of 
 thouglit wliich follows entirely different laws of association. 
 These reasons seem to me sufficient for advising any person 
 desirous of cultivating the habit of attention, either to 
 abandon the reading of fiction altogether, or, at least, to in- 
 dulge in it with such severe discretion as shall prevent it 
 from fostering those habits which we desire to eradicate 
 After we have accomplished our object, and the victory of 
 the will over our other powers has been acknowledged, we 
 may allow ourselves a larger liberty. Until this is done, 
 the stricter the discipline whicli we enforce upon curselves, 
 the more rapid will be our attainment in the habit of 
 self-government. 
 
 3. The power of the Avill over our other faculties i 
 
128 INTELLECTUAL rfllLOSOl'HY. 
 
 greatly issisted by punctuality ; that is, by doing everything 
 in precisely the time and place allotted for the doing of it 
 If, when the hour for study has arrived, we begin to waste 
 our time in frivolous reading or idle musing, we shall find 
 our real work more distasteful, the longer we procrastinate 
 If, on the contrary, we begin at once, we the more easily 
 conquer our wandering propensities, and our minds are full_y 
 occupied before trifles have the opportunity of alluring us. 
 The men who have accomplished the greatest amount of in- 
 tellectual labor have generally been remaricable for punc- 
 tuality ; they have divided their time accurately between 
 their different pursuits, have rigidly adhered to the plan 
 which they have adopted, and have been careful to improve 
 every moment to the utmost advantage. 
 
 4. The control of the will over our fiiculties is much as 
 sisted by the use of the pen. The act of writing cut our 
 own thoughts, or the thoughts of others, of necessity in- 
 volves the exercise of continuous attention. Every one 
 knows that, after he has thought over a subject with all the 
 care in his power, his ideas become vastly more precise by 
 committing them to paper. The maxim of the schoolmen 
 was stud'nnn sine calamo somniiini. The most remark- 
 able thinkers have generally astonished their contemporaries 
 by the vast amount of manuscript which they have left be- 
 hind them. I think that universal experience testifies to 
 the fact that no one can at!;ain to a high degree of mental 
 cultivation, without devoting a large portion of his time to 
 the labor of composition. 
 
 It is a very valuable habit to read no book without oblig- 
 ing ourselves to write a brief abstract of it, with the opinions 
 which we have formed concerLJng it. This will oblige us to 
 •ea^.' with attention, and v/ill give the results of that atten- 
 tion a permanent place in our recollection. We should 
 thus, in fact become reviewers of every book that we real 
 
ATTL'NTION AND REFLECTION. 12D 
 
 The learned arul indefatigable Rcinhardt was thus able to 
 conduct one of the most valuable reviews in Germany, hy 
 writing his opinions on every work which came under his 
 perusal. The late Lord Jeffrey commenced his literary 
 career in precisely this manner. AVhen a youthful student 
 at the university, he not only Avi-ote a review of every book 
 ■which he read, but of every paper which he himself com- 
 posed. His strictures were even more severe on his own 
 writings than on the writings of others. He thus laid the 
 foundation of his immense acquisitions, and attained to so 
 great a power of intellectual analysis, that for many yeara 
 he was acknowledged to be the most accomplished critic of 
 his time. 
 
 RE FEREN CES. 
 
 Oonsciou.sness — Reid, Essay 1, chap. 1 ; Abercrombie, Part 2, sect 
 2 ; Locke^ book 2, chap.^, sect. 2 ; chap. 9, sect. 1. 
 
 Is consciousness distinguished from perception ? — Stewart, voL L 
 chap. 2. 
 
 Cases of Abnormal Consciousness — Abercrombie, Part 3, sect 4 ; part 2 
 
 Attention and Reflection — Reid, Essay 1, chap. 5 ; Essay 4, chap. 4 
 Stew.art, vol i., chap. 2. Abercrombie, Part 2, chap. 1. 
 
 Improvement of Attention and Reflection, Part 2, chap. 1. 
 
 Consciousness — Cousin, sect. 1, p 12, 8vc • Uiutford, 1834. Hesr/ 
 ^aoslatioi, and cote A, by } tot H. 
 
CHAPTER IIL 
 
 OStCnWAL SUGGESTION, OR THE INTUITIONS <j¥ TUI 
 INTELLECT. 
 
 SECTION I. —EXAMINATION OF THE OPINIONS OF LOCKE. 
 
 We have thus far considered those powers of the human 
 mind by v^bich it obtains a knowledge of the existence and 
 qualities cf the external world, and of the existence and 
 energies of the thinking subject. This knowledge, as I 
 have said, is all cither of individual existences or of individ- 
 ual acts, or stiitta of the subjective mind. It is, of course, 
 all concrete, and the conceptions derived from it are of ttie 
 same character. This knowledge is original, direct and Im- 
 mediate. It is the constitutional testimony of our faculties 
 as soon as they are brought into relation to their appropri- 
 ate objects. It always contemplates as an object something 
 now existing, or something which at some time did exist. 
 
 Let us, then, for a moment consider what would be the 
 condition of a human being possessed of no other powers 
 than those of which we have thus far treated. He would be 
 cognizant of the existence and qualities of the objects which 
 he perceived, and of the state of mind which these objects 
 called into exercise: and. if endowed v.'ith memory, be could 
 retain this knowledge in recollection. Here, however, hia 
 knowledge would terminate. Each fact would remain dis- 
 connected from every other, and each separate knowledge 
 wculd terminate absolutely in itself No relation between 
 
OPINIONS OF LOCKE. 131 
 
 an J tno facts ■would be either discovered or sought for 
 The questions why, or "wherefore, •would neither be asked 
 nor answered. The knowledge acquired would be perfectly 
 barren, leading to nothing else, and destitute of all tendenej? 
 and all pjwer to multiply itself into other forms of cognition 
 The mind would be a perfect living daguerreotype, on which 
 foiras were indelibly impressed, remaining lifeless and un- 
 changeable forever. 
 
 It was the opinion of Locke, that all our knowledge either 
 consisted of these ideas of sense or consciousness, or was" 
 derived from them by comparison or combination. Thus, 
 says he, " First, our senses, conversant about particular 
 sensible objects, do convey to the mind several distinct per- 
 ceptions of things, according to those various ways in which 
 those objects do affect them. Thus we come to those ideas 
 we have of yellow, Avhite, heat, cold, soft, bitter, and all 
 those which we call sensible qualities ; which, when I say 
 the senses convey to the mind, I mean they from external 
 objects convey into the mind what produces these sensations. 
 This source I call Sensation.'^ — Book 2. chap. 1, sec. 3. 
 
 Secondly. '• The other fountain from which experience 
 furnlsheth the understanding with ideas, is the perception 
 of the operations of our own minds within us, as it is em- 
 ployed about the ideas it has got ; which operations, when 
 the soul comes to reflect on and consider, do furnish the 
 understanding with another set of ideas, which could not be 
 nad from things without. Such are perception, thinking, 
 doubting, believing, reasoning, knowing, willing, and all 
 those different acts of our own minds, which, we being con- 
 scious of and observing in our ownselves, do from these 
 receive into the understanding as distinct ideas as we dc 
 from bodies affecting our senses. I call this Reflect iony^ I j' 
 --Ibid. sect. 4. ^-^'^'^ 
 
 "The understanding seems tome not tc \iave the leaai "^"^ ,-J"/ 
 
16Z INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY 
 
 glimmering of any ideas which it does not receive from onfl 
 of these two. External objects furnish the mind with the 
 ideas of sensible qualities, which are all these different per- 
 ceptions thej produce in us, and the mind furnishes the 
 understanding with ideas of its own operations." Again ; 
 " Let any one examine his own thoughts, and thoroughly 
 search into his understanding, and let him tell me whether 
 all the original ideas he has there are any other than of the 
 objects of his senses, or of the operations of the mind 
 considered as objects of his reflection, and how great a mass 
 of knowledge soever he imagines to be lodged there, he will, 
 upon taking a strict view, see that he has not any idea in 
 his mind but what one of these two have imprinted, though, 
 perhaps, with infinite variety, compounded and enlarged by 
 the understanding, as we shall see hereafter." — Ibid. Sec. 5. 
 Again: "If we trace the progress of our minds, and 
 with attention observe how it repeats, adds together, and 
 unites its simple ideas received from sensation and reflection, 
 it will lead us further than perhaps we should have imagined. 
 And I believe we shall find, if we warily observe the orig- 
 inals of our notions, that even the most abstruse ideas, how 
 remote soever they may seem from sense or fi-om any oper- 
 ations of our own minds, are yet only such as the under- 
 standing frames to itself by repealing and joining together 
 those ideas that it had from objects of sense, or from its 
 own operations about them." — Book 2d, chap. 12, sec. 8. 
 .' From these extracts it appears e\'ident that Locke be- 
 ( lieved all our original kno?rledge to proceed from perception, 
 N)r, as he calls it, sensation, and consciousness. Whatever 
 other knowledge we have, is produced secondarily by adding 
 together, repeating, and joiniug together, the simple ideaa 
 derived from these original sources. I have before re- 
 marked that these ideas are of individuals and are concrete. 
 If, therefore. tkt> theory of Locke be correct, all our othei 
 
OPINIONS OF LOCKE. 13& 
 
 knowiecl>^e ii created by adding, repeating, and joining 
 together these indivi<lual and concjete concepticns. 
 
 Now, if this be so, — if it be the law of our nature that the 
 human intellect is incapable of attaining to any other knowl- 
 edj.';e than the ideas of sensation and reflection, that is, of 
 perecption and consciousness, — in other woids, than the 
 knowledge of the qualities of matter and the operations of 
 our own minds, then it follows that all our notions which 
 cannot be reduced to one or the other of these classes, is a 
 more fiction of the imagination, unworthy of confidence, 
 and is, in fact, no knowledge at all. But it_is obvious that 
 there are in our minds many ideas which belong to neither 
 of these classes ; such, for instance, are the ideas of relation, 
 power, cause and effect, space, duration, infinity, right and 
 wrong, and many others. Can these be produced by the 
 uniting, joining, or adding together our conceptions of the 
 qualities of matter, or of our own mental acts 7 Let any 
 one try the experiment, and he will readily be convinced 
 that they can be evolved by no process of this kind. It 
 will follow then, if the theory of Locke be admitted, that 
 these notions, which I have above specified, and all others 
 like them, are mere fancies, the dreams of schoolmen or of 
 fanatics having no real foundation, and forming no sub- 
 stantial basis for science, or even valid objects for inquiry. 
 Nothing, then, can be deemed worthy of the name of science 
 or knowledge, except the primitive data either of perception 
 or consciousness, or what is formed by adding, uniting, join- 
 ing together, these primitive cognitions. Hence, the i ieag 
 of which I have spoken, such as those of space, duration, 
 infinity, eternity, cause and effect, all moral ideas, — nay, 
 the idea of God himself,— are the figments of a dream, and 
 all that remains to us is merely what we can perceive with- 
 out and be conscious of within. This was the conclusion 
 at which many men arrived at the close of the last century 
 12 
 
134 INTELLECirAL PHIIOSOPHY 
 
 luasmuch as Ueir principles were said to be derived fronj 
 Locke, he has sometimes been considered the fovuder ol 
 the sensual school. 
 
 It is, however, to be observed, that Locke did not perceive, 
 much less would he have admitted, the result to which hia 
 doctrines led. He speaks yi the ideas to which I have 
 alluded, such as space, power, &c., as legitimate objects of 
 human thought, and gives quite a correct account of th eir 
 origin. Thus, speaking of power, he remarks : " The mind 
 being every day informed by the senses of the alteration of 
 those simple ideas it observes in things without, and taking 
 notice how one comes to an end and ceases to be, and an- 
 other begins to exist which was not before ; reflecting, also, 
 on what passes within itself, and observing a constant change 
 in its ideas, sometimes by the impression of outward objects 
 on the senses, and sometimes from the determination of its 
 own choice ; and concluding, from what it has always ob- 
 served to have been, tliat like changes will for the future 
 be m.ade in the same things by the same agents, and by 
 the like way considers in the one thing the possibility of 
 having any of its simple ideas changed, and in another the 
 possibility of making that change, and so it comes by that 
 idea which we call power." — Book 2, chap. 21, sec. 1. 
 
 Here we perceive that Locke acknowledges the existence 
 of ideas or knowledges derived neither from sensation nor 
 reflection, and gives a very intelligible account of their 
 origin. It is obvious that the idea of power is not derived 
 from the senses ; we neither see, nor feel, nor hear it. It 
 is not an operation of the mind, therefore is not derived 
 from reflection. And, besides, comparing, adding together, 
 a: iting. are acts of the mind, wholly different either from 
 pel ^eption or consciousness. It is evident, therefore, that 
 Locke, Avhen he examined the ideas in his own mind, ob- 
 ierved among them many whicli neither perception n' r con* 
 
OPINIONS OF LOCKE. 135 
 
 Bcunisness could give ; and he. perhaps carelessly, accouuUid 
 for their origin by the use of the indefinite expressions, 
 '' takes notice of," " concludes," "conies to the idea," &o. 
 We see, therefore, that Locke went beyond his own theory, 
 and really saw what his theory declared could not be sf>en. 
 Had he pursued a diflferent method, and first observed the 
 ideas of w Inch we are conscious, and afterwards investigated 
 their origin, his system would probably have been greatly 
 modified. He, however, pursued the opposite course ; first 
 determining the origin of our ideas, and then limiting our 
 ideas by the sources which he supposed himself to have 
 exliausted. 
 
 The manner in which Locke was led into this error is 
 apparent. He had been at great pains to refute the doctrine 
 of innate ideas, and to show that the human mind could 
 have no thought until some impression was made upon it 
 from without. It was also obvious to him that the only 
 objects which we are able to cogaize are matter and mind. 
 He compared the mind to a sheet of white paper, entirely 
 blank until something is written on it by a power external 
 to itself This, however, although the truth, is only a part 
 of the truth. As I have before remarked, if the sheet of 
 paper had the power of uniting the letters written upon it 
 into words, and these words into discourse, and of proceed- 
 ing forever in tlie elimination of new and original truth, it 
 would much more accurately represent the intellect of man. 
 This illustration of a sheet of white paper evidently misled 
 our philosopher, and prevented him from giving due prom- 
 inence to the originating or suggestive power of the mind. 
 
 Tbis brief n-)tice of the opinions of Locke seemed neces- 
 sary, especially since so great and important conclusions 
 nave been deduced from his doctrine. The whole subject 
 Has been treat 3d in a most masterly manner by Cousin, is J 
 
136 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPlIi. 
 
 his RevieA^ of the Philosophy of Locke, to whicl I wculi 
 specially refer the student. 
 
 But tc what conclusion are we led bj this brief examina- 
 tion of the theory of Locke 1 We haN' e seen that, on th* 
 supposition that all our ideas are derived from perception 
 and consciousness, a large portion of the most important 
 ideas of '^hich the human soul is conscious must be aban- 
 doned as the groundless fictions of the imagination, having 
 no foundation in the true processes of the understanding. 
 On the other hand, we know from our own consciousnesa 
 that these ideas are universally developed in the human in- 
 tellect as soon as it begins to exercise independent thought 
 We must, therefore, conclude, that the theory of Locke is 
 imperfect, and that it does not recognize some of our most 
 important sources of original knowledge. It is, then, our 
 business to inquire for some other sources besides those 
 recognized by Locke. 
 
 REFEEENCES. 
 
 Sources of our knowledge — Locke, Book 2, chap. 1, sec. 3, sec. 4, 
 ■ec. 5 ; Book 2, chap. 12, sec. 8, chap. 22, sec. 1, 2, 9. 
 
 Suggestion a power of the mind — Reid, Inquiry, chap. 2, sec. 7 ; Int 
 Powers, Essay 3, chap. 5 ; Essay 2, chap. 10, 12. 
 
 Examination of Locke's Theory — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 1. 
 
 Before all others. — Cousin's Examination of Locke's Philosophy, chap 
 1,2,3,4. 
 
 SECTION IL — THE NATURE OF ORIGINAL SUGGESTION, OB 
 THE POWER OF INTUITIVE COGNITION. 
 
 Locke has truly stated that all the substances to which 
 hi our present state we are related are matter and mind. 
 By perception we obtain a knowledge of the qualities of the 
 one, and by consciousness a knowledge of the operations o1 
 
OKIGINAL SUGGESTION 13T 
 
 die othjr. Ea;h is distinct and complete -n-ithiri itself, and 
 each terminates definitely at its own appropriate limit. 
 
 The thought, however, thus awakened, does not thus ter- 
 minate. The mind of man is endowed not only with a 
 ; ecepiive, but also with what may be called a siftr^^estive 
 power. When the ideiis of perception and consciousness 
 terminate, or even while they are present, a new series cf 
 mental phenomena arises by virtuo of the original power 
 of the intellect itself These phenomena present them- 
 selves in the form of intuitive cognitions, occasioner] by the 
 ideas of consciousness and perception, but neither produced 
 by them nor in any respect similar V) them. They may be 
 considered acts of pure intellection. To the ideas of per- 
 ieption or consciousness there by necessity' belongs an 
 object either objective or subjective. To those ideas of the 
 mtellect I think no such object belon,^. Hence they could 
 not be cognized originally either by perception or conscious- 
 ness. They could not exist within us except we were 
 endowed with a different and superior iutellectual energy. 
 We can give but little account of these intellectioiis, nor 
 can we offer any proof of their verity. As soon as tliey 
 arise within us, they are to us the unan.»werable evidence 
 of their own truth. As soon as we are conscious of ihem, 
 •we know that they are true, and we never oflfer any evidence 
 in support of them. So far as our powers of perception 
 and consciousness are concerned, the mind resembles in 
 many respects a sheet of white paper. Here, however, the 
 analogy terminates. There is nothing in the paper which 
 in any respect resembles this power of intuitive knowledge 
 of which we here speak. 
 
 What we here refer to may. perhaps, be best ilbv-strated hy 
 
 R familiar example. A child, before it can talk, throws a 
 
 ball and knocks d)wn a nine-pin. By perception aidetl by 
 
 memory it derives no other ideas besida* those of a ^^ol^'iia 
 
 12* 
 
138 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 ball anil of a fulling ninepin. This is all that the sense! 
 couli give it. It might be all that would be apparent tc 
 the n.iiid of a brute. But is this the case with the child] 
 Far othfiuise. There arises in his mind, by viitue of its 
 own energy, the notion of cause and effect; of sc mething in 
 the ball capable of producing this change, and of something 
 in the nine[)in which renders it susceptible of this change. 
 He instinctively cognizes a most "important relation existing 
 between these two events. Still more, he has an intuitive 
 belief that the same event can be produced again in the 
 same way. Relying on this belief, he sets up the ninepin 
 again, and throws the ball in the confident expectation that 
 it will produce the same result as at first. There has thu3 
 been cieated in his mind, not only the relation of cause and 
 effect, but the important conviction tliat like causes will 
 produce like eff:;cts. In consequence of the relations which 
 have thus been revealed to him, he sets a value upon his 
 toys which he did not before. The same idea is developed 
 as soon as the intant puts his finger in the candle. He will 
 not try the experiment a second time. He immediately 
 ol)tains a knowledge of the relation of cause and effect, and 
 that the same cause will again produce the same effect. 
 He does not see this relation ; it is not an o'lject of percep- 
 tion, nor is it an operation of the mind. He does not feel 
 it when he is burned. As soon, however, as he cognizes 
 the relative ideas, the relation in which they stand to each 
 other presents itself to him as an intuitive cognition. 
 
 I have here used an illustration from external objects. I 
 however, by no means assert that in this manner we first 
 arrive at the knowledge of- cause and effect. The same idea 
 is evidently suggested by every act of voluntary motion. 
 A child wishes to move his hand ; it moves, but perhaps not 
 m the right direction. He tries again with better success. 
 At last he accomplishes his object. Hei e is, perhaps, th< 
 
OTliniNAL SUGGESTION 1.^9 
 
 roost strikinjjj instance of this reiation whicli he ever wit 
 uosaes, and it is brought home directly to his own conscious- 
 ness, lie is conscious of the act of volition, he knows that 
 he wills ; this mental ac*- is followed by a cluuige of position 
 ni his hand, and by motion in something A\ith wliich his 
 Land conies into contact. This succession of events, the for- 
 mer of which is within the cognition of his own conscious- 
 less, and the latter of his perception, would be sufficient tc 
 give occasion to this intuitive knowledge at a very early 
 pel iod. 
 
 It may be proper to observe, that although this power of 
 original suggestion is developed and perfected with advanc- 
 ing years, yet it commences with the first unfolding of 
 the intellect. Both the perceptive and the suggestive 
 powers belong to the essential nature of a human mind 
 Were a child destitute of the power of intuitive cognition, 
 even at a very early age, we should know that it was an 
 idiot. If, for instance, it manifested no notion of cause and 
 eifect, but would as soon put its fingers into a candle the 
 second time as the first, we should be convinced that it waa 
 not possessed of a normal understanding. Nay, we form 
 an opinion of the mental capacity of a child rather by the 
 activity of its suggestive than of its perceptive powers. It 
 may be blind or deaf, or may suffer both of these afflictiona 
 together ; that is, its perceptive powers may be at the mini- 
 mum, and yet we may discover that its intellect is alert and 
 vio'orous, and that it discovers large powers of acquisition 
 and combination. Such a case occurs in the instance of 
 Laura Bridgman, a blind nmte, whose suggestive powers are 
 unusually active, and who has, with admiiiwle skill, been 
 taught to read and write, so that she is at present able to 
 k'«p a journal, and correspond with her friends by letter 
 
 With respect to these ideas of suggestion, or intuititti. twc 
 
14 J INTELLKCTUAL PniLOSOPHT. 
 
 important remarks are made 'dj Cousin. I gi\e hia idea* 
 here, rather than his words. ^"-- — 
 
 1. " Unless we previously obtained the idea of perception 
 and consciousness, we could never originate the suggested or 
 intuitive cognitions. If, for instance, we had never observed 
 the fact of a succession, we could never have obtained tha 
 idea of duration. If we had never perceived an external 
 object, we should never have obtained the idea of space. Ii 
 we had never witnessed an instance of change, we should 
 have had no idea of cause and effect. As soon, however, as 
 these ideas of perception and consciousness are awakened, 
 they are immediately either attended or followed by the 
 ideas of suggestion. We perceive, then, that, chrono/og-i- 
 cally considered, tlie ideas of perception and consciousness 
 take precedence. They appear first in the mind, and. until 
 they appear, the others could have no existence. It was 
 this fact which probably gave rise to the error of Locke. 
 Because no other ideas could be originated except through 
 means of the ideas of perception and consciousness, he in- 
 ferred that our knowledge could consist of nothing but these 
 ideas, either in their original form, or else united or added 
 to each other. The fact, on the contrary, seems to be, that 
 our suggested iJeas are no combination or modification of 
 our receptive ideas ; they form the occasions from which the 
 mind originates them by virtue of its own energy. We are 
 80 made, that, when one class of ideas is cognized, the other 
 spontaneously arises within us, in consequence of the con- 
 stitution of the human intellect. 
 
 2. "But, secondly, when we have thus obtained these 
 ideas of suggestion, we find that their existence is a neces- 
 sary condition of the existence of the very ideas by which 
 thcsy are occasioned. Thus, as I have st^id, toe r^otkni of 
 an external world is the occasion in us of the 'A°>% of .^p'ic<» 
 but, when we have obtained the idea of space, t:c se^ ih U 
 
ORIGINAL SUGGESTION. 141 
 
 It in a necessary condition to the conception of an external 
 world : for. were there no space, there could be no external 
 world. If we had never witnessed a succession of events, 
 we should never have obuiined a conception of duration. 
 Having, however, o'btiiined the conception of duration, we 
 perceive that it is a necessary condition of succession ; for. 
 were there no duration, there could be no succession. And 
 again, had we never observed an inst;ince of chang*, we 
 should never have attj\ined the conception of cause and 
 eflfect. or of power. But the conception of power once 
 gained, we become immediately sensible that, had there been 
 no power, change would have been impossible. We thus 
 learn that, logically considered, the suggestive idea takes 
 the precedence, inasmuch as it is the necessary condition of 
 the idea by which it is occasioned."' 
 
 With these remarks of this most acute and very able meta- 
 physician I fully coincide, so far as they apply to a large por- 
 tion of our ideas of suggestion. I think, however, that there 
 is a large class of our intuitive cognitions, of which the second 
 of these laws cannot be affirmed. Take, for instance, our 
 ideas of relation and degree, arising from the contemplation 
 of two or more single objects. I do not see how it is true 
 that the relation is a necessary condition to the existence of 
 tiie bodies which occasion it, or that the idea of degree is a 
 necessary condition to the existence of the qualities by which 
 it is occasioned. I dissent with diffidence from an author 
 so justly distinguished ; nevertheless, in treating on this, as 
 on any other subject, I am bound to state fully the truth aa 
 it presents itself to my individual consciousness. 
 
 In order the more fully to illustrate tliis subject, I have 
 thouf^ht it desirable to present a num))er of instances in 
 which these original suggestions or intuitions are occa- 
 Bioned by the ideas of perception and cunsciousness. I by 
 no means attempt an exhaustive catalogue. Jt will be suffi- 
 
142 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 cient for mj purposes, if I am able to present sach a viv.w 
 of the subject as will direct more definite attention than haa 
 generally been given to tbis part of our intellectual consti- 
 tution 
 
 It has seemed to me that these intuitions might be class- 
 ified as follows 
 
 I. Th -)se unaccompanied by emotion. 
 
 II. Those accompanied by emotion. 
 
 I. Those unaccompanied by emotion are, 
 
 1. Those occasioned by objects in a state of rest 
 
 2. Those occasioned by objects in the condition of chan^ 
 
 II. Those accompanied by emotion are, 
 
 1. Esthetic ideas. 
 
 2. Moral ideas. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 Cousin, chaps. 2, 8, and 4. 
 
 SECTION III. IDEAS OCCASIONED BY OBJECTS IN A STATE 
 
 OF REST. 
 
 We may contemplate objects in a state of rest either aa 
 one or many. Let us, in the first place, examine a single 
 object. 
 
 Suppose, for instance, a solid cube is placed before me. 
 I look at it, and perceive its color and form ; I handle it, and 
 perciive that it is hard and smooth, and that its form is the 
 same as I have discovered by sight ; I strike it, and it gives 
 forth a sound ; I attempt to smell it and taste of it, and 
 thus derive all the knowledge of its qualities which I am 
 tt,ble to discover. I reflect on these various acts of percep- 
 tion, and thus obtain a knowledge of the state of my mind 
 when performing these mental acts. I have then all th«f 
 
ORIGINAL SfGGESTION. 113 
 
 knowledge which I can derive from perception and con- 
 Bciousness. Had I no other mental energies, my know}- 
 edge would here arrive at an impafsable limil. If, however, 
 we reflect upon our own cognition i, we shall be conscious of 
 much important knowledge occasioned by these mental acts. 
 wliich the acts themselves do not give us. 
 
 I look up^n the cube ; I perceive it to be extended ; I re- 
 move it to another place. What is there where the cube 
 was a moment since 7 "What is that which the cube occu- 
 pies, and in which it is contained \ It can be occupied by 
 matter, or left vacant. I become conscious of the fact that 
 it is a condition necessary to the existence of all matter. 
 Abolish it, and I abolish the possibility of an external uni- 
 verse. I call it space. "What is it 7 It has no qualities 
 that can be cognized by the senses. It is neither an act 
 nor an affection of the mind. It is not matter ; it is not 
 spirit. It differs from both in every conceivable particu- 
 lar. The existence of matter is made known to us by the 
 senses. Space is cognizable by none of them. It is neither 
 seen, nor felt, nor heard, nor smelled, nor tasted. Matter 
 is a contingent existence ; it may or may not exist here, or 
 it may not have existence anywhere. I can conceive of an 
 era in duration when it never existed. I can conceive of 
 another era w hen it will cease to exist. Not so of space ; 
 as soon as I form a notion of it I perceive it to be neces- 
 sary. I cannot con'^eive of its non-existence or annihilation. 
 This cube and all other matter is limited and is so from 
 necessity ; space is by necessity unlimited. M.stter being 
 limited, of necessity has form; space has no form, for it has 
 no limitation. The conception of a body, however vast, 
 suggests an image ; space suggests to us no image. We find 
 tjurselves, therefore, in possession of a conception, revelled 
 to us neither by perception nor consciousnes?, which, never- 
 theless, is cognized by the mind, from the necessity of ita 
 
144 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 own nature. Without perception it would never have heca 
 cognized. Chronolo^ncally. it is, therefore, subsequent to it 
 As soon, however, as I obtain this conception. I know tha\ 
 it is a necessary condition to the existence of that which is 
 perceived. It is necessary physiologically ; for witliout 
 Bpace there can be no matter. It is necessary psycholo^'i- 
 cally : for we cannot in our minds conceive of matter with- 
 out conceiving of space as a necessary condition of our 
 conception. 
 
 But let us reflect upon this idea somewhat more atten- 
 tively. We all have a knowledge of what is meant by space; 
 we c.mnot e:isily confound it with any other idea ; yet no 
 one can describe it. It has no qualities. It liolds no rela- 
 tion to our senses, or to our consciousness. What are its 
 limits ? As I have before said, it has none. The house in 
 which I am writing occupies space, and is contained in space. 
 The eai-th and the whole planetary system move in space. 
 The whole sidereal system either moves or reposes in space 
 We pass to the utmost verge of the material universe — space 
 still stretches beyond, unmeasured, imme:isurable. We have 
 appioached no nearer to its confines th.;n at first ; for, were 
 such creations as now e.xist to be nmltiplied forever, sjwce 
 woiiM be yet inexhaustible. What do we call this idea, 
 which, by the constitution of our minds, emerges necessarily 
 from this conception .' It is the idea of the boundless, the 
 imioensurible. the infinite. It is an idea wliioh we cannot 
 coniprelien<l. and yet from which we cannot escape, W€ 
 aiay. perhaps, remember how, in childhood, we wearied our 
 feeble understandings in the attempt to grasp it. It is at 
 present as far beyond the power of our comprehension a.«« at 
 first, yet we find the mind ever tending towards it. It is an 
 idea neither of perception nor consciousness, nor can it b> 
 avolved from any union or combination of those ideas. It 
 evolves itself at once, on our conception of space, from *Ji« 
 
wm 
 
 ORIGINAL SUGGESTION. 146 
 
 energies of the mind itself. Having been onct) formed, it 
 holds its place independently in the mind, and depends not 
 for its existence on any other idea. 
 
 Again ; I cannot be conscious of my own existence with- 
 out being conscious at the same time that I am an individ- 
 ual, separate not only from the rest of the material, but 
 from the other individuals of the spiritual universe. I am 
 in myself, a complete form of existence, distinct from every 
 other form that has existed, or that may exist. When I 
 ob&?rve the cube, it suggests to me the same idea, that of 
 unity. I retain this idea of oneness, apart from any object 
 which at first suggested it. It cannot be called a quality. 
 It is not an energy of the mind ; yet it is an idea which 
 immediately arises within us, on such occasions as I have 
 suggested. 
 
 It may, however, be proper to remark, that this idea of 
 unity is always relative. It always has respect to the 
 relation in which we contemplate an object. An individual 
 human being is one ; yet it possesses one body and one 
 spirit, and without both of these, in our present stat€, it 
 would not be a human being. A human soul is one ; but, in 
 order to be a human soul, it must be possessed of various 
 faculties, each one of which may be considered distinctly. 
 A regiment is one, and yet it could not be a regiment, un- 
 less it were composed of several distinct companies united 
 under a single commander. A company is one ; but it is 
 made up of single individuals, as privates, subalterns, cap- 
 tain, etc. We thus see that, in speaking of unity, the rela- 
 tion in which we contemplate the object is always to be 
 taken into view : and that there is no absurdity or contra- 
 dicticn in saying, that it is one in one relation, indmany in 
 another relation. 
 
 JiCt us look once more upon our cube. We perceive in it 
 Fcrm, solidity, divisibility, color, etc. These we call quali- 
 18 
 
146 intellectjAL philosophy. 
 
 ties of matter, or the powers which it possesses of affecting 
 us in a particular manner. But is either cf these qualities 
 matter 7 Are all of them combined matter 1 Were we to 
 say that color and form and divisibility, etc., are matter, or 
 substance, would this assertion express the idea of which wr 
 are conscious when we reflect upon this subject 7 So far ia 
 this from the fact, that the assertion would seem to involve 
 an absurdity. We always say of a material object, it is 
 something divisible, solid, colored, etc. ; plainly distinguish- 
 ing, in our conceptions, the something in which the qualities 
 reside, from the qualities which reside in the something. We 
 thus find ourselves possessed of the two ideas, essence and 
 attribute, substance and quality. We know that there must 
 be one, whenever we perceive the other. But where does 
 this idea of substance come from 7 Surely neither from the 
 senses nor from consciousness ; yet we all have attained it 
 It must have originated in the mind itself. We perceive 
 the quality. The mind affirms the existence of the sub- 
 stance, and affirms it not as a contingent, but as a necessary 
 truth. 
 
 It is almost superfluous to remark, that we arrive at the 
 Hame idea from consciousness. Consciousness testifies to the 
 existence of mental energies. From this knowledge, the 
 mind at once asserts the existence of an essence to wliich 
 these energies pertain. Were there no mental energies, we 
 could never become cognizant of a spiritual substance ; but, 
 having been cognizant of it, we know that it is a necessary 
 condition to the existence of the energies of which we are 
 conscious 
 
 2. These instances are sufficient to illustrate the nature of 
 the cognitions which are suggested by the energies of the 
 mind itself, when we contemplate a sbigle object. Let U3 
 now suppose several objects, seme of similar and others t>f 
 
ORIGINAL SUGGESTION 1 / 
 
 dissimilar qualities, to be present before us. Suppose ^he \, 
 for instance, cubes, pyramids, cylinders, etc. 
 
 If I observe them singly, each will furnish me with all 
 the primary and suggested idetis to which I have just now 
 referred. I observe several io be of one form. I compare 
 their aggregtite with unity, and there arises in my mind the 
 idea of number. As soon as I have formed this notion, I 
 find myself abstracting it from the cubes, and from every 
 otLer object, and treat it as a conception by itself, capable 
 of enlargement or diminution at my will. So readily doe3 
 this conception separate itself from the objects which gav* 
 occasioo to its existence, that, in the rudest conditions of 
 society, men give names to the several ideas of number, and 
 very soon form a symbolical language to represent them. 
 Every one knows that his ideas of number were originally 
 derived from the observation of a plurality of objects: and 
 yet no one. thinking of ten, twenty, thirty, to say nothing 
 of thousands and millions, ever associates these ideas with 
 any actual existences. We always consider them as abstract 
 ideas, yet ideas of the most fixed and determinate character. 
 But these ideas are not objects of perception. We neither 
 see nor feel nor taste number; yet perception occasions 
 these ideas. We know number as soon as the occasions 
 which suggest it present themselves. 
 
 In enumeration, we always proceed by unity. We re- 
 peat unity until we arrive at a certain aggregate, which we 
 then consider as a unit. Thus, in our enumeration, we 
 repeat unity, giving a different name to every increasing 
 aggregate, until we arrive at ten. We then make this our 
 unit, and add to it other similar units, until we arrive at a 
 hundred ; in the same manner, we make this our unit until 
 ivc airive at a thousand then to a million, etc. Suppose, 
 aow, I carry on this process to any assignable limit, can I 
 exhaust my idea of number ? Suppose I proceed until mj 
 
lis inteilectual philosophy. 
 
 powers of computation fail, have I yet pvoceeded so fiir thai 
 I cannot add to the sum millions upon millions ? Can 1 
 conceive of any number so vast that I cannot add to it aj 
 many as I choose 7 We perceive this to be impossible. 
 Here, again, we recognize the same xlea which lately 
 evjlved from our notion of space. It is the idea of infinity. 
 We see that it springs at once, by the operation of our 
 minds, from every conception capable of giving occasion 
 to it. 
 
 Again; we cannot observe a number of objects at the same 
 time, without recognizing various relations which exist be- 
 tween them. I see two cubes possessing in every respect 
 the same qualities. Hence arises the relation of identity 
 of form, color, etc. Others possess different qualities; hence 
 the relation of divei-sity. When the forms are precisely the 
 same, or when they occupy exactly the same space, there 
 arises relation of equality. When they occupy different 
 measures of space, there arises the relation of inequality. 
 These latter relations are specially used in all our reason- 
 ings in the mathematics. All our demonstrations in this 
 science are designed to show that two quantities are either 
 equal or unequal to each other. 
 
 Still further, I perceive that two or more objects are not 
 in contact. Space intervenes between them, and we recog- 
 nize the relation of distance. Each one has a definite rela 
 tion in space to all the others. Hence arises the relation 
 of place. Place always refers to the position which a body 
 h'jlds in respect to other bodies. Were there but one body 
 in space we could not from it form any notion of place. 
 As soon as other bodies are perceived, and their relation to 
 it recognized, we obtain this idea respecting it. Thus, I 
 Biiy this paper lies where it dii ten minutes since. Here I 
 refer to tlie table and the objects uj>on it, whose position in 
 relation to the paper is the same as it was before, leaving 
 
ORIGINA: SL'GliEsTION. 
 
 Hi 
 
 tut of account altogether the fact that the table has moved 
 with the diurnal and annual revolution of the earth. A 
 man in a railroad car will say that he has not changed hia 
 place for half a day, -when he knows that he has been 
 moving at the rate of thirty or forty miles an hour. 
 
 Again ; we perceive that, of several cubes, the first occu- 
 pies a larger portion of space than the second, and the 
 eecond a larger portion than the third. All of them are 
 rei, but the tinge of one is deeper than that of another. 
 Hence arises the relation of degree. This idea is so univer- 
 Bally recognized, that, in all languages, it is designated by 
 a special form, entitled degrees of comparison. 
 
 But it is not necessary that I pursue this subject further. 
 I think that every one must recognize in his own mind a 
 power of originating such knowledges as these, as soon as 
 the occasion presents itself They are not ideas of p'^rcep- 
 tion or of consciousness, but ideas arising in the mind, by its 
 own energies, as soon as we cognize the appropriate objects 
 which occasion them. Having once obtained then? thejf 
 immediately sever themselves from the objects which occa- 
 sion them, and become ideas of simple intellectioD which 
 ve use as abstract terms in all our reasonings. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Space — Locke, Book 2, chap, 13 ; Cousin, chap. 2 ; Kei^ Essay 2, 
 chap. 19. 
 
 Space and bo<ly not the same — Locke, Book 2, chap. 13 Onusin 
 ehap. 2. 
 
 Infinity from space — Locke, Book 2, chap. 13 ; Cousin, chap^ 8 ; K«id 
 Essiy 2, chap. 19. 
 
 Unity — Locke, Book 2, chap. 7. 
 
 Substance and solidity — Locke, Book 2, thap. 4 ; Ciuisin, ca»p 8 
 
 Nunber — Locke, Book 2, chap. 16, 17 ; Cousin, chap 3. 
 
 Eelition — Locke, Book 2, chap. 25. 
 
 Identity and Diversity — Locke, Uoo'k 2, chap 27. 
 
 Place — Locke, Book 2, chap. 13. 
 
 13* 
 
1 50 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 8B0TI0N IV. — Sl'GGESTED IDEAS OCCASIONED BT IHB 
 CONSIDERATION OF OBJECTS IN THE CONDITION OP 
 CHANGE. 
 
 Every one must be aware that motion, change, progress. 
 &nd decay, are written upon everything within us, and 
 upon eveiytliing without us. It is natural to suppose that 
 a variety of suggestions, or intuitive cognitions, would be 
 occasioned by the development of this universal law. 
 
 Our thoughts are in a condition of perpetual change. 
 Thought succeeds thought ; one conception follows another 
 without a moment's cessation, at least, during our waking 
 houis, from the commencement to the close of our present 
 existence. The idea of incessant change is essential to 
 Dur notion of life. Abolish it, and the result is universal 
 death. 
 
 Destitute of memory, we should be unconscious of these 
 changes, and cognizant only of the thought or emotion of 
 the present moment. Endowed with memory, however, we 
 become aware of the fact that the thought of which we are 
 now conscious is not the thought of which we were con- 
 scious a few moments since ; and that the thoughts oi 
 yesterday, or of boyhood, are very different from the 
 thoughts of to-day. 
 
 The same knowledge is also derived from the acts of per- 
 jeption in connection vith memory. We perceive a cloud 
 overspreading the heavens. When last we looked upward 
 all was clear; now all is lurid. Again, the cloud is dissi- 
 pated, and all is sunshine. We arise in the morning, and 
 light is gradually stealing over the heavens. Soon, the sun 
 irises, and all nature is aioused to life. In a few hours it ia 
 mid- day, and animal and vegetable droop w?th the ex- 
 cessive heat. Soon the sun declines ; it sinks beneata the 
 
DrRATION. 
 
 151 
 
 licrizon ; we are fanned by the breezes of the evening, and 
 behold the blue expanse above us dotted with innumerable 
 Btar3. Had we no memory, we should be cognizant of the 
 existence of but one phenomenon, — that which presented 
 itstU to us at a particular moment. Our existence in con- 
 Bc.'ousness would be limited to the smallest conceivable por- 
 tion of duration. Constituted as we are, we become aware 
 that one event succeeds another ; and we hold the fact of 
 this succession distinctly within our knowledge. 
 
 From both consciousness and perception, then, united with 
 memory, we acquire a knowledge of succession; that is, 
 tliat some other event or events preceded that of which we 
 are now cognizant. But another idea is immediately occa- 
 sioned in a human mind by the idea of succession, different 
 from it, and from any which we have thus far considered 
 It is the idea of duration. I cannot define it. I cannot 
 ex[)lain it. Yet it belongs to the very elements of human 
 thought. We can neither think nor act without taking it 
 for granted. It is a condition of existence ; for, were there 
 no duration, nothing could exist. It is neither an idea of 
 perception nor of dmsciousness. We cannot cognize it by 
 our senses, nor is it an operation of the mind. Tlie intel- 
 lect seizes upon it as soon as we recognize the fact of 
 succession. No one can give any further account of its 
 origin. No one can enumerate its qualities, for it has no 
 qualities. Yet, every one has the idea, and no one can con- 
 ceive of its non-existence. 
 
 \Ve perceive, in th^s case, the difference between the 
 chronological and the logical order of these two ideas. 
 Chronologically, the idea of succession takes the precedence; 
 fur, unk-ss we had first cognized the fact of succession, we 
 shouhl never have obtained the idea of duration. But when 
 both have been acquired, we immediately perceive that dura- 
 tion is the necessary condition to succession ; f^r, withou* 
 
J 62 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY 
 
 Juration, succession would be impossible. Logically, there- 
 fore, duration takes the precedence. 
 
 The first measure of duration seems naturally to be the 
 succession of our own thoughts. A portion of duration 
 seems long or short, in retrospect, according to the numbei 
 of events to which we have attended, and the tone of mind 
 or the degree of earnestness with which we have observed 
 them. But it is obvious that these elements vary greatly 
 with the same individual at different times, and with dif- 
 ferent individuals at the same time. We, therefore, seek for 
 some definite portion of duration, as the unit by which we 
 may measure with accuracy any other limited portion. 
 Such natural unit is found in the revolution of the heavenly 
 bodies ; and hence we come to measure duration by days, and 
 months, and years, or by some definite portion of these 
 units. Duration measured in this manner we call time. 
 If I do not mistake, we mean, by time, that portion of dura- 
 tion which commences with the creation of our race, and 
 which will terminate when " the earth and the things therein 
 shall be dissolved." 
 
 But let us take a year, and add to it by unity. We soon 
 arrive at a century. Taking this as our unit, we add again, 
 until we arrive at the era of the creation. We go backward 
 still, until we even find ourselves in imagination at the com- 
 mencement of the sidereal system. Duration is still unex- 
 hausted; it is yet an unfathomable abyss. We conceive 
 of ages upon ages, each as interminable as the past duration 
 of the material universe, and cast them into the mighty 
 void ; they sink in darkness, and the chasm is still unfathom- 
 able. We go forward again, and add century to century, 
 without finding any limit. We pass on until the present 
 system is dissolved, and duration is still immeasurable. We 
 add together the past and the future term of the existence 
 of tha universe, and multiply it by millions of millions and 
 
DURATION. 153 
 
 we have approached no nearer than at first to the limits of 
 duration- We are conscious that it sustains no relations 
 either to measure or limit. It is beyond all computation 
 made by addition of the finite. It is thus, from the con- 
 templation of duration, that the idea of the infinite arises 
 in a human intellect from the necessity of its nature. 
 
 'This idea of the infinite, to which the mind so necessarily 
 tends, aud which it derives from so many conceptions, is 
 one of the most remarkable of any of which we are cogni- 
 zant. It belongs to the human intelligence, for it arises 
 within us unbidden on various occasions, and we cannot 
 escape it. Yet it is cognized by none of the powers either 
 of perception or of consciousness. It is occasioned by 
 them ; yet it differs from them as widely as the human mind 
 can conceive. The knowledge derived from these sources 
 is by necessity Hmited and finite. This idea has no rela- 
 tions whatever to anything finite. It has no qualities, 
 yet we all have a necessary knowledge of what it means. 
 Is there not in this idea some dim foreshadowing of the rela- 
 tion which we, as finite beings, sustain to the Infinite One, 
 and of those conceptions which will burst upon us in that 
 unchanging state to which we are all so rapidly tending? 
 Of cause and effecl, and of power. 
 
 I proceed to the consideration of this important subject. 
 I have no expectation of adding anything new to a discus- 
 sion, which, from the earliest history of philosphy, has 
 engaged the earnest thought of the ablest men. I shall not 
 enter upon the consideration of many of those questions 
 which emerge out of it. Were I to attempt to present 
 them ever so briefly, I should transcend the limits to which 
 a work of this kind must be restricted. I shall content 
 myself with stating the views which, after some reflection, 
 havii presented themselves to my own mind. 
 
 L«it us, then, commence with the observation of a single 
 
154 TXTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHi. 
 
 pbencraenon ; that is, a case of change. Suppose, for in* 
 stance. I observe that water, which a few minutes since was 
 Quid, has now become solid. I find myself unable to think 
 of this change as an isolated Hict, or as the commencement 
 of a series. It must have had antecedents. Nor is this 
 all. The antecedents must have stood in a certain relation 
 to it. Suppose I attempt to think of this change as occur- 
 ring while all the conditions of the existence of the fluid 
 remained throughout just as they were at the beginning. 1 
 cannot think it. There is a book on one end of my table. 
 I leave the room for a moment, and, on my return, 1 find it 
 at the other end of the table. I ask what moved it. I am 
 answered, nothing. I am told that all the conditions of the 
 existence of that book had been absolutely the same during 
 its change of place ; that no agency of any kind had been 
 exerted upon it, and yet the book had been removed from 
 one place to another. I am obliged to reply I cannot think 
 it. It is as unthinkable as the proposition that two straight 
 lines can at the same time be parallel and at right angles 
 with each other, or that two circles can cut each other in 
 more than two points. I intuitively know that there must 
 have been a cause which rendered the water hard, which an 
 hour ago was fluid; and a cause which removed the book 
 from one place to another. If I am asked why I think in 
 this manner, I can give no account of it. I am obliged to 
 say I am so made. To think in this mann^'- seems to me 
 necessary to the normal condition of a human intellect. 
 
 T)iis. however, is but one form of causation ; the case in 
 which the antecedent and cons^^juent, the cause and effect, 
 are both brute matter. A variety of other cases deserves tsj 
 be considered. 
 
 2 Brute matter may be the cause of change in spirit 
 Thug, I open my eyes and see a tree. A sonorous body \a 
 struck, and I hear a sound. Here brute matter produces in 
 
POWER CAUSE AXD EFFECT. loA 
 
 me a change. A new condition of mind is produced within 
 mc, which I denominate a knowledge. This could not have 
 existed but for the presence of the material objects which 
 have caused it. Under some circumstances, the effect is as 
 'nevitable as when both cause and effect are material. The 
 .Tect. however, is liere modified by conditions unknown in 
 'i? former case. For instance, a considerable portion af 
 .av ?ife is spent in sleep, during which time the effect of 
 ordiii.:ry agents upon my mind is suspended. Again ; no 
 knowledge is created in my mind except through the medium 
 of consciousness. But consciousness is indirectly subject to 
 the will. If, by the effort of the will, it is earnestly directed 
 to another object, the tree may be present, or the sonorous 
 body may be struck, and no appropriate knowledge is created 
 in my mind. Here, we see that a new element entere into 
 the conditions of cause and effect, by which the universal 
 relation of the one to the other is considerably modified. 
 
 3. Spirit or u''ind may be the cause of change in matter. 
 The simplest initince of this mode of cause and effect is in 
 Lbe movement of the limbs. I put forth my hand and t<ike 
 a pen between my fingers. I dip it in the ink and proceed 
 to write a sentence. Here. I am conscious of an effort of 
 the will. I perceive the movement of my hand, and I 
 observe on the paper precisely the words which I intended 
 to write. In the normal condition of my spiritual and mate- 
 rial faculties, this effect is universal. But I observe hero 
 another peculiarity. The event to be produced is foreseen 
 by the n:ind. and it takes place precisely according to ita 
 predetermination. I ought, however, to add that, though 
 this event is always foreseen and intended, yet, by education, 
 the connection between the volition and the material result 
 is rendered more perfect. Thus, when I began to write, I 
 at first made nothing but straight lines, and could net for 
 some time make them as correctly as I intended. By prao 
 
166 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHT. 
 
 tice, however, I rendered the connection between the voli- 
 tion and the physical act more and more perfect, so that 
 thej cani3 at last to correspond with considerable accuracv 
 to each other. 
 
 4. Spirit may be the cause of change in spirit. This 
 includes two cases : First, when we effect changes in the 
 condition of our own minds ; and, secondly, when we effect 
 changes in the minds of others. 
 
 1. When we effect changes in our own minds. For in- 
 stance, I am thinking of some subject ; I resolve to banish 
 it, and think of something else ; I succeed. The fii-st thought 
 is displaced; it is to me, for the time, as if it had never 
 existed, and I now think of something entirely different. 
 Here, however, we may observe a considerable range in the 
 conditions of the phenomena. In the first place, much de- 
 pends on the general, and, also, on the particular energy of 
 my will. It may be constitutionally feeble, or, by neglect, 
 I may have lost the power of self-control. I try to banish 
 the present thought, and it will not leave me, or, if it leaves 
 me for the moment, it immediately returns. Again, I may 
 know that I ought to banish the thought whicii now occupies 
 me, and I resolve to do it ; but, on the other hand, the 
 thought is pleasant to me, and I am unwilling to relinquish 
 it. Either no result, or a very imperfect one, is accom- 
 plished. Or, again, some peculiar thought has seized upon 
 me with overwhelming power, and, under my present cir- 
 cumstances, I cannot displace it by any effort of my will. 
 For instance, suppose I am a miser. I have cultivated 
 within myself the habit of esteeming wealth the greatest of 
 earthly blessings, and have given it the first place in my 
 affections. By a sudden calamity, a large portion of my 
 property is destroyed. Thinking of it will not restore it. I 
 desire to banish the subject from my mind. I cannot ; it ia 
 present with me by day and by nigh\ tormenting me, and T 
 
POWER, CAUSE AND ErFECT. 151 
 
 eannot help it. Here the p:wer of the will is conditioned 
 by the present sUite of the uiind itself, which state is tiio. 
 result of successive previous volitions. We hence perceive 
 that the act Df the will here is suiiject to conditions wholly 
 unknown in the third cise considered; that is, where the 
 inmd acts on material substances. 
 
 2. The mind may produce change in other minds. Ilere 
 the conditions become more complicated. I will suppose 
 myself in the possession of some truth, which is, in its na- 
 ture, adapted to effect a change in the mind of anoiher ; for 
 instance, a change in his course of action. Now, the effect 
 pro<luced will depend both on the state of my own mind and 
 the state of mind in those whom I address. Thus, I may con- 
 ceive the truth imperfectly, feebly, so as to leave an indefinite 
 impression on others. I may conceive of it adequately, but 
 I may be unaffected by it myself, and may have no particu- 
 lar desire to affect others. Or, again, having a clear con- 
 ception of it myself, I may have an all-absorbing desire to 
 cause others to be affected as I am affected myself. Each 
 of these conditions will probably vary the effect produced 
 on the minds of others. Or, in this List case, supposing 
 myself to be ever so much in earnest, the effect of my com- 
 munication may be different in the case of each auditor. 
 The effect will, in each case, be determined by the state of 
 every man's mind. In one I may create joy, in another sor- 
 r.w ; one may be pleased, another displeased ; one may re- 
 solve to take the course which I recommend, and another to 
 resist it to the uttermost. Here, the same cause produces 
 diametrically opposite effects ; the effect in each individual 
 case being determined hy the present condition of the mind, 
 »nd its relation to the truth which I exhibit. 
 
 Now, concerning these various cases, I wouLl offer a fen 
 suggestions. 
 
 1. So far as 1 ."m able to discover, these are all leg'ti- 
 U 
 
158 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPUT 
 
 mate instances of cause and effect. Whether I hare incla<]e<l 
 them all, I pretend not to determine, but I think no exhaust- 
 ive classification can be formed A\iihout including those 
 which I have mentioned. 
 
 2. The link which binds together the cause and the effect 
 is in all cases, hidden. This is, I believe, universally 
 granted. We may observe the cause and then the effect, 
 but a veil is in all cases spread over the nexus between 
 them, which it has not been given to the human mind to 
 penetrate. 
 
 3. When I examine these several cases, they seem to me 
 very unlike. The matter affecting and affected is, in the 
 different instances, exceedingly dissimilar, and the results 
 produced are very widely different. What can be more 
 unlike than the freezing of water by cold and the change 
 of the moral character of a human being by the presenta- 
 tion of truth 7 
 
 4. Hence, I would ask, may there not be different kinds 
 of causation 7 May not causation in matter be a totally dif- 
 ferent nexus from causation in mind I Were we endowed 
 with faculties capable of knowing perfectly all the phenom- 
 ena, might we not find them as dissimilar in themselves as 
 they are in their eflects 7 
 
 5. Such being the possibility, can it be legitimate to rea- 
 son from causation in the one case to causation in the other; 
 that is, to conclude that because causation in matter is one 
 thing, therefore causation in spirit is the same thing 7 Is 
 not the argument for fatalism deduced from a view of the 
 inlissoluble nature of cause and effect founded on this as- 
 sumption 7 
 
 6. Granting, what is evidently true, that, under precisely 
 the present conditions, any given cause mus' inevitably 
 produce, whether in matter or spirit, a definite »nd certain 
 
POTTER, CAUSE AXD EFFECT. 151) 
 
 effbct; are there not many things predicahle of the inevita- 
 Ueness in the one case which cannot be predicated of it 
 in the other ? For instance, I present to a miser a case of 
 distress, precisely calcuhited. in its nature, t^ awaken benevo- 
 lent emotions in the mind of an intellectual and moral being 
 in a normal condition. But, by a course of previous volun- 
 tary action, he has so changed his mind from its normal 
 condition, that the recital serves no other purpose than tc 
 harden his heart against suffeiing. In his present condition, 
 this /-esult as inevitably full)\vs from my appeal, as hia 
 death would follow from plunging a knife into his bosom. 
 Now, granting the inevitubleness in both these cases to be 
 the same, is the nexus between the two events of the same 
 character? Suppose me to know the inevitablcness to bo 
 the same, is the moral character of the two actions equal 7 
 
 If, then, finally, the nature of causation in matter and 
 causation in mind be so unlike, when finite beings alone are 
 concerned, that we cannot reason from the one to tlie other ; 
 how much greater must be the disparity when the cause is 
 infinite, and the eifect produced is on the finite! IIow, es- 
 pecially from causation in matter, can we reason respecting 
 ihe acts of the Infinite Spiiit, whose thoughts are not as our 
 ;houghts ? It would surely be a humbler and wiser pliilos- 
 Dphy, if we believe in a Universal Cause of perfect holiness 
 and perfect love, to receive the facts of his government as 
 be has revealed them, assured that in the abysses of his 
 wisdom, far past our finding out, mercy and truth go before 
 his face, and justice and judgment are the habitation of his 
 throne. 
 
 The notion of cause, by the constitution of the human mind, 
 involves ihe idt-a of f)Ower. It is the logical condition to 
 this idea: without it, the idea of cause could not exi3t. It 
 hi that in the cause by virtue of which 't pr duces iis e6«t 
 
ICO INTELLECTUAL PHILOsOFHY. 
 
 It is a cause simply, and for no other reason, than that UB 
 it resides the power. 
 
 The notion of power is always fixed and invariable. Wf 
 cannot conceive of it as, under the same circumstances, 
 sometimes producing an eflfect and at otiier times produc- 
 ing none. When we find such an antecedent, we at once 
 determine that it is destitute of power, and that it is not, ia 
 this case, a cause. It is essential to our conception of 
 power, that under the same conditions it shall invariably 
 produce the same change. 
 
 Hence, we perceive the difference between invariable suc- 
 cession and cause. Cause is invariable succession with the 
 additional idea of power. Cousins illustration here is ap- 
 posite. "I sit in my room," he observes, " and wish 
 that I could hear a certain air. Some one in another room 
 plays it. I wish for it again, and it is played again. But 
 this is a very different thing from taking up an instrument 
 and playing it myself The one is a case of succession, the 
 other of cause and effect. In the latter, I recognize my 
 own volition, not merely as the antecedent, but the cause of 
 the sounds." And we may observe, still further, that the 
 power, by reason of its in variableness, is the sole reason of 
 the in variableness of the succession. Were not power such 
 as I have suggested, the succession might intermit, vary, 
 and fluctuate, indefinitely. 
 
 This idea of cause and effect, and power, is not derived from 
 experience, as some philosophers have asserted. It springs by 
 aecessity from the original constitution of the human mind. 
 When we observe a change we cannot do otherwise than 
 think of the cause. The change furnishes the occasion for 
 the creation of this idea ; but, as soon as we have arrived at 
 It, we know that the existence of the power residing in the 
 cause was the necessary condition to tha existence cf th« 
 effect. It arises as ti\i]y on the fii'st ob-er ration of a change 
 
PO^YER, CAUSE AXl. EFIECT. 161 
 
 M on the thousandth. It is as obvious to the apprehension 
 of children as of adults If i" was not apparent in the lirsl 
 instance, it could not be in the thousandth. If, in the lii-st 
 instance, we recognize nothing but succession, and had no 
 idea of cause and of power, the second instance would be 
 preci.?ely like it, and the third, and thus indefinitely 
 Every one remembers the case reported of Dr. Beattic. llo 
 rrote, on the prepared soil of his garden, the name of iiis son, 
 & ^ery young child, and sowed some delicate seeds in the 
 lines which he had thus traced. In a few days the child 
 came running to inform him of the wonder whicli lie had 
 discovered — his own name plain.y growing in the flower- 
 bed. The father, for a while, pretended to believe that there 
 was no cause for the phenomenon, but that the letters had 
 grown in their present form of themselves, and be attempted 
 to create this belief in his son. It was all in vain ; the child 
 could not believe it. The necessary relation of cause and 
 effect was as deeply fixed in his mind as in the mind of hia 
 father. Dr. Beattie then made use of this illustration to 
 teaoh him the necessary existence of a First Cause. The 
 same incident, I observe, has been related of the father of 
 Gen. Washington. 
 
 But, it may be asked, has experience nothing to do with 
 our investigation of the laws of cause and effect ? I answer, 
 nothing ^\hatever with our original idea of cause and of 
 power. This is given us in the very constitution of our 
 intellectual nature. If it were not so given, we should have 
 no conception of a cause, and should, of course, have nc 
 occasion to institute any inquiries concerning it. 
 
 But, although experience, or more properly experiment, 
 famishes us with no origimil ideas of causation, yet, when thia 
 idea h.ts been given us, and we know that by necessity the 
 cause of a certain phenomenon must exist; it is by experiment 
 adone that vye are able tc discover what :hat cavse is Ex 
 
162 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 perimcnt, tli n-efore, follows directly upon the suggestion of 
 causation in any particular instance. This may be clearlj 
 illustratetl by observing the principles which govern us in 
 carrying forward a case of philosophical investigation. The 
 sti'ps in such a piocess aie, I think, the following : 
 
 1. We observe an instance of obvious and manifest ciiange 
 or in the language of philosophers, a phenomenon. We aie 
 er made that we cannot think of this change without also 
 thinking of the cause which produced it. Every one knows 
 that to speak of a change producing itself, or of a change 
 occurring with no relation whate\er to any other event, ii 
 not only to speak nonsense, but to utter what is unthink- 
 able. 
 
 2. Tiiis notion of cause, which, in these circumstances, 
 has arisen within us, involves the idea of power. It is, in 
 fact, this power which makes it a cause. But, since power 
 is a fixed and unchangeable idea, we cannot conceive of it 
 without conceiving of it as always acting in the same way 
 under the same circumstances. Hence, we know that in 
 whatever antecedent the power resides, that antecedent 
 must be the cause of the phenomenon. And, on the other 
 hand, when we observe any antecedent to be fixed and in- 
 variable, in that we suppose the power to reside ; that is, 
 we aiEim this antecedent to be the cause of the consequent 
 effect. 
 
 8. In order, then, to ascertain the fixed and invariable 
 antecedent, we institute our experiments. We place the 
 phenomenon under every variety of antecedents. When we 
 find an antecedent which, under all circumstances, invaria- 
 bly precedes the change, we assume this to be the cau^e. 
 [lonceforth. these two events hold this relation to each 
 i)ther, 
 
 4 Hence, we perceive that if two distinct and separate 
 tfvents were the stated and 'invariable antecedents of motheJ 
 
POWER, CAUSE AND EFFECl. 1C3 
 
 event, it would be impossible to determine which of the twr 
 was the cause. One would fulfil the conditions of the prob 
 lem as well as the other. Hence we see that our knowl- 
 edge of causation is never absolute, being always conditioned 
 hy the actual progress of human knowledge. Thus, so fai 
 na human observation has gone, the event A has always 
 been the invariable antecedent of the event B. But subse- 
 quent investigations may reveal the fact that A is not tho 
 invariable antecedent, or that the antecedency of A is condi- 
 tioned by some other event with which it must be combined 
 in order to produce the effect. Thus, it was observed that 
 water boiled at 212° of Fahrenheit, and it was, for a long 
 time, supposed that this law was universal. It was, how- 
 ever, subsequently ascert-iined that it boiled on the tops 
 of high mountains at a lower temperature. Hence it was 
 necessary to condition the former law by the pressure of the 
 atmosphere, and say that water boi!! at 212° at the level 
 of the sea. If it should be found tha: the electrical condi- 
 tion of the atmosphere had any power ii modify the result 
 it would be necessary to add this new condition to the origi- 
 nal law. 
 
 It may be useful to illustrate these remarks by observing 
 the manner in which we proceed in determining any particu- 
 lar cause. I will take, for example, the fieezing of water. 
 
 I perceive, on some occasion, for the first time, that 
 water, which I left fluid at sunset last evening, is solid this 
 morning. I, first of all, inquire whether it be the ider tical 
 Bubstance which was a short time since fluid. I examine 
 the vesse! in which it is contained ; I ascertain that no human 
 being has approached it ; that all the other water in the same 
 vicinity has undergone the same transformation. I am 
 aaiislieJ that here is a case of legitimate change. 
 
 i?rom the constitution of my mind, I am unable to conceive 
 that this change could have been produced without an afie- 
 
164 IK'TELLECTUAL rHILOSOPHT. 
 
 quate cause. Had the water i-emained through tl i night 
 with all its rcLitions to all other things unchanged, it must 
 by necessity have continued in its original condition. This 
 is to me as obvious as that if a body be at rest, it must forever 
 remain at rest, unless some power from without comj el it to 
 assume the condition of motion. There must, therefon, b<? 
 some cause for this event. The instinctive impulses of mv 
 nature lead me to inquire for this cause. This inquiry Icon- 
 duct by experiment or trial. In what manner shall I proceed? 
 I first observe all the antecedent events which I am able 
 to discover. For instance, the water was fluid in daylight; 
 it became solid in darkness. Darkness may have been the 
 cause of its solidity. It became solid in the open air ; it 
 returned to its former fluidity as soon as it was brought intc 
 the house. Change of place may have been the cause cf 
 the phenomenon. Or, again, I observe that tliere was a 
 sudden change of temperature during the night, and that 
 the mercury in the thermometer fell from 40° to 20°. This 
 change of temperature may be the cause of which I am in 
 search. I proceed to institute a series of experiments for 
 the purpose of determining which of these is the invariable 
 antecedent of the plienomenon. I find that water, in various 
 instances, becomes solid in light as well as in darkness, and 
 that again it becomes fluid in darkness when it had become 
 solid in daylight. Darkness cannot, then, have been the 
 cause. I examine the other hypothesis. Was change of 
 place the cause 7 I find that, without any change of place, 
 the water which was solid at sunrise becomes fluid at noon. 
 Change of place will not, therefore, account for the phenom- 
 enon. Was the cause, then, the change of temperature ? 
 I subject water to this trial. I find that everywhere, 
 and under all circumstances, when the temperature falla 
 below 82° Fahrenheit, water becomes solid, whether by 
 iay or by night, and without any regard to locality. * 
 
POWER, CAUSE AND EFFECT. 165 
 
 therefore arrive at the conclusion that the tetnperature of 
 K)''!" is the cause of the freezing of water, and that watei 
 has the susceptibility of being frozen at this temperature 
 The two events thus stand to each other in the relation of 
 cause and effect I have discovered the cause of the event, 
 cr, in other Lmguage, I have accounted for a phenomenon. 
 It 13 on these principles, and in this manner, that we proceed 
 in any legitimate case of philosophical investigation. 
 
 Having thus obtained the idea of causation and of power, 
 and having learned how to deteimine the cause in any par- 
 ticular case, the necessity of our intellect obliges us to pro- 
 reed a step further. As we look about us, we observe that 
 every tiling bears witness to the exertion of power. The 
 universe is subject to perpetual change, and change without 
 the idea of power is unthinkable. Day and night, sun- 
 shine and storm, summer and winter, spring and autumn, 
 are names indicative of changes and classes of changes 
 Dore numerous and more complicated than the human mind 
 ian comprehend. Power is, then, one of the most univer- 
 sal ideas of which we are able to conceive. But let us look 
 %t the case a little more carefully. We s;iy that atmospheric 
 lir, moisture, and sunlight, are the causes of vegetation. 
 Let us, then, examine the growth of a vegetable, from the 
 putting forth of its first leaf, through all the changes of it3 
 development, to its beautiful flower and its ripened fruit. 
 Let us examine a single leaf, and investigate all its func- 
 tio3a, and their exquisite adaptation to cooperate in the 
 general design. Let us generalize /his case, and we find 
 t£ surface of our globe to be thickly covered with just 
 euch instances. We cannot fail to observe that the beautj^ 
 jknd adaptations of the effect infinitely transcend any attri- 
 bute possessed by tlie physical cause. We cannot conceive of 
 the gases of tlie atmosphere, the drops of water, and the rays 
 ■»f the sun, as ailequate causes of all these wonderful results 
 
166 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 We conceive by necessity of some cause or causes autoon, 
 beyond, directing, cortiolling. energizing, those jjerceiveJ 
 causes, in wLich, at first view, this power seemed to reside. 
 
 To ascend thus from apparent to unseen causes, from 
 {ihysiciil to supernatural power, seems to be the necessary 
 tendency of our ijitellectual nature. The human mind is 
 hardly capable of so intense degradation as not to lecognize 
 the existence of some power unseen, by ^hich all that is 
 seen is governed and sustained. Hence have arisen the 
 innumeriible systems of idolatry wr.ich have prevailed am(mg 
 men. Every nation recognizes some invisible powers as the 
 causes of visible changes, and hence as obj.tcts of worship. 
 The very absurdity of many of these systems teaches ua 
 this tendency in the clearest possible manner. The more 
 absurd the object of worship, the stionger is the proof that 
 the necessities of the human intellect demand some cause 
 to which the changes of visible nature can be referred ; and 
 that it will accept the most preposterous notion of an ulti 
 mate cause, sooner thaii believe that no such cause exists. 
 
 But the human mind, having advanced thus far, proceeds 
 by necessity a step further. As we contemplate the vari- 
 ous phenomena of the universe, we observe that no class of 
 facts, nor any single fact, is isolated. All are parts of one 
 pl.in, tlie development of one idea. The vegetable and 
 animal kingdoms, the laws which govern organic and inor- 
 g-.nic nature, and the relations which subsist between them, 
 all represent portions of one idea, which must have been 
 conceived by a single intelligence before anything visible 
 waa created. Hence we are called upon to a'^count for thia 
 perfect harmony in this infinite variety of parts, the perfect 
 order which exists among beings in themselves so diverse 
 from each other. We can account for it only on the sup- 
 position that the cause of causes is not many, but one, in- 
 finite in power and -yisdom, the sufficient reason why every 
 
t»01VKR, CAUSE AND EFFECT. 
 
 167 
 
 thing IS, and why it is as we now behold it. That this 
 opinion has universally prevaikd among men who have 
 addicted themselves to thinking, is manifest. The piiih>so- 
 ^^hers who paid an outward respect to the classic mythology 
 ackno\vle<lged and reverenced the Supreme Divinity. And 
 everywhere, among men of reflection, it has been acknowl- 
 edged that, if tliere are causes beyond those which we per- 
 ceive, there must be one universal Cause, all-powerful, all- 
 wise, all-good, self-existent, and, of course, eternal. 
 
 But, supposing this to be granted, other (piestions emerge 
 from this belief If there be a universal, all-pervading Cause, 
 what is the nature of his agency ? In material causation, la 
 he the sole operator in every change, so that every event ia 
 an immediate act of the Deity, or the result of such an 
 ict'l Or, on the other hand, has he constituted matter with 
 such attributes and relations that all which we see is tiie 
 necessary consequence of the original creation, from which 
 the Creator has withdiawn, and over which he now exerts no 
 agency 7 And, again, in spiritual changes, similar questions 
 arise. Does the free will of man act independently of any 
 controlling agency of the Deity, or is the Deity the causd 
 of spiritual change, as in the first supposition above ia 
 regard to matter l Or has he so created spirits that the 
 chan:es of which we ai-e conscious proceed by necessity 
 from the elements of our original creation I These ques- 
 tions, and many more, arise from the conception of ai. uni- 
 versal, all-pervading, and all-powerful Cause. 
 
 With res[)ect to these inquiries, I would remark, in gen- 
 eral, that I believe the most opposite answers to either of 
 them can probably be proved to be true, by arguments 
 which it would be difficult to confute ; and that the clearest 
 reasoning may lead us to results at variance with the sim- 
 plest dictates of our moral and intellectual nature. To w iiat 
 tonclusion, then, shall we arrive / I arewer, to the belief 
 
163 INTELLECTUAL I'HILOSOPHT. 
 
 ihat the subject is clearly beyond the reach of our under- 
 standing. The point in which the infinite and the finite 
 come in contact has been, and must ever be, hidden from 
 mortiil eyes. It is the dictate of reason and religion that 
 the Deity is all-wise, all-good, and all-powerful, and there- 
 fore that he is the only being capable of governing the uni- 
 verse whioh he has made. It is not possible that such a 
 being should govern it too much. On the other hand, we 
 have the evidence ot our own consciousness that we are per- 
 fectly free. We know that such a being as the Deity must 
 carry on his wise and just and merciful intentions, and that 
 he must carry them on through the agency of his intelli- 
 gent creatures; we know, also, that we are perfectly fiee 
 to act as we choose, and that this freedom is an essential 
 clement of our moral responsibility. Of the manner in 
 which these agencies cooperate, I think we must be contend 
 to remain in ignorance. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Idea of powci- -Locke, Book 2, ch.ip. 7, sec. 8. 
 Power, active and pa.«sive — Locke, Book 2, chap. 21, sec. 2. 
 Cause anil effect — Locke, Book 2, chap. 26. 
 Idea of a God — Locke, Book 4, chap. 10, sec 1 — 8. 
 Cause and effect — Reid, Essays on In. Powers, Essay 6, chap. 6 
 Power, c;iuse and effect — Reid, Essays on Active Powers, Essay 1. 
 Locke's id&i of power exau>ined — Cousin, chap. 4. 
 Notion of power dorived cither from the objective or subjective — 
 Cousin, chap. 4. 
 
 r,Kcricx V. — suggested ideas accompanied by e.motion. 
 
 We have thus far considered those ideas which are sug- 
 2;ested to us by the contemplat'on of oojects which pioduce 
 'ill us no emotion. They are purely intellectual, and hav« 
 
SUGGESTED EMOTIONS. 169 
 
 no othei effect upon us than to increase our knowledge. 
 Thus, the ideas of duration, cause and effect, space, and a 
 variety of others, are simple knowledges, and produce in us 
 no ulterior state of mind. 
 
 Were we merely intellectual beings, these would be all 
 the suggestive ideas of which we need be conscious. But 
 we find the case to be otherwise. We are made not only to 
 knnic, but iofepl. As we look abroad upon the world, we 
 find ourselves not only capable of knowing that things are or 
 are not, but also of deriving pleasure or pain from the con- 
 templation of them. Who does not know with what eager 
 g3ze the eyes of the child are turned towards the rainbow] 
 Who has not been deeply moved at beholding the glory of a 
 summer's sunset? Again, it is undeniable that we are 
 variously affected by our observation of the actions of our 
 fellow-men. Some of them awaken in us admiration, re- 
 spect, gratitude and love ; others fill us with disapprobation, 
 disgust and abhorrence. These various cognitions, and the 
 emotions which they create, belong, I suppose, to the class 
 of original suggestions. They may be divided into two 
 classes : 1, Ideas of the beautiful and the sublime, or ideas 
 of taste ; and, 2, Moral ideas. 
 
 1. Ideas of the heaiil'ifid and siihVime. 
 
 Let us commence the exposition of this subject by an 
 example. Suppose there were placed before us an antique 
 marble vase of exquisite workmanship. We look at it, and 
 observe its color, and form, and proportions. We feel of it, and 
 discover that it is solid, smooth and heavy. We test it by 
 our other senses, and ascertain whether or not it possesses 
 any qualities which they can recognize. When we have 
 done this, we have obtained all the knowledge concerning it 
 which our perceptive faculties can give. 
 
 Let us now place by the side of it a rough block of mar 
 ble. of a similar magnitude. The senses give us, as before, 
 15 
 
170 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 a kiiOMleage of its color, form, solidity, roughness or smooth- 
 ness, sonorousness, taste and smell. Thia knowledge is all 
 that our perceptive faculties can give us in either case. 
 Were we merely intellectual, that is, unemotional beings, 
 no other impression besides that of knowledge would be 
 produced upon us. Both of these objects would be con- 
 templated with equal indifference ; n;iy, the rough block 
 might be preferred, if we could devote it to a purpose of 
 utility of which the other was not susceptible. Thus, we 
 are told that, not unfrequently, the remains of a beautiful 
 statue are found imbedded in mortar, in the wall of a peas- 
 ant's hovel, in the neighborhood of an ancient city on the 
 plains of Asia Minor. 
 
 Let us now observe these objects together, and remark 
 the feelings which they awaken within us. We cannot fail 
 to observe that the one has a power of affecting us very dif- 
 ferently from the other. As we look upon the one, we are 
 conscious of an emotion of exquisite pleasure. We attach 
 to it a value such as wealth can scarcely estimate. We look 
 upon the other with total indifference, or, it may be, with 
 disgust, and cast it away as an incumbrance. To the one 
 we are powerfully attracted, while from the other we are 
 repelled. We recognize in the one the quality of beauty, 
 of which we perceive the other to be destitute. A child at 
 an early age would make this distinction. Every one 
 knows how strongly even very young persons are attracted 
 by brilliant colors and agreeable forms. Yet this emotion 
 cannot be defined. It arises unbidden at the contemplation 
 of outward objects of a particular character, under such 
 circumstances as have been appointed by the Creator to 
 occasion it within us. 
 
 This idea is not, however, cognizable directly by th« 
 senses. We neither see, nor hear, nor feel, nor taste beauty; 
 nor is it an energy of our minds. Yet, whenever we per* 
 
EMOTIONAL SI GGESTIONS. 173 
 
 *yive certain external objects, there arises within us the 
 knowledge that they are beautiful, and we are conscious ot" 
 the subjective emotion which this quality occasions. In 
 this respect it resembles the other suggested ideas. They, 
 as we have seen, are not cognized by the senses, but the 
 cognitions derived from the senses are the occasion of 
 tlieir existence. So, in this case, as soon as we are con- 
 Bcioas of the perceptions, w^e are conscious of the cogni- 
 tion of this quality, and of the emotion which this quality 
 produces. 
 
 The emotion of the beautiful is suggested by an infinite 
 variety of objects in the external world. It arises from the 
 contemplation of form, of color, of motion, of proportion, 
 and, in fact, from almost every object in nature. I shall 
 not here enter into an illustration of these obvious facta. 
 It is suflBcient merely to allude to them, reserving the more 
 extended discussion to another place. 
 
 If we observe the various objects which give occasion to 
 this emotion, we shall observe them to be exceedingly dis- 
 similar. The objects are unlike, but the emotion is the 
 same. We thus learn to distinguish the emotion produced, 
 from the causes Avhich produce it. Having done this, we 
 ascribe to any object this quality, if it produces in us this 
 paiticuhir emotion. Thus, the mathematician speaks of 
 the beauty of a demonstration ; the critic, of the beauty of 
 a metaphor ; the moralist, of the beauty of a social relation ; 
 and the mechanic of the beauty of a machine. In each 
 case, the emotion of the beautiful is awakened in the mind 
 of the speaker, and he ascribes the quality of beauty tc 
 that which produces it. 
 
 There is also another emotion, suggested by the contem- 
 pi ition of material and immaterial objects, in many respects 
 similar to the emotion of beauty. The mode of its origin 
 is the same. It is suggested, in the first instiince. '7 ohjecta 
 
172 INTELLECTUAL PUILOSOPHY, 
 
 In nature , it is a source of exquisite pleasure ; it arist-^ on 
 B great variety of occasions; but jet the emotion itself J3 
 always the same. Its character may perhaps be best illu.-i- 
 trated by an example. lie who has stood by the sea-side in 
 a storm may perhaps remember the ceaseless roar of the 
 waves, the rude shock of the surge, which, heaving itself 
 against the cliflf, made the solid rock to tremble beneath 
 him, and the tossing of the white foam as it flew from the 
 crest of the billow. All this might have been equally well 
 perceived by the dog at his feet, or the wild sea-bird, as, 
 screaming in gladness, it dashed into the thickest of the 
 spray. But these are not all the ideas that arise within the 
 bosom of the man. Besides all these, he feels an emotion 
 of awe, and yet of exultation; of solemnity, and yet of 
 ox?itement; of humility when he thinks of his own little- 
 ness, and yet of greatness when he yields himself up to the 
 conceptions which crowd upon him. His imagination roama 
 Dver the ocean ; he muses upon its matchless power, its vast 
 3xtent, its deceitful smiles, and its sudden wrath, until he ia 
 bewildered in the throng of his thick-coming flincies. Every 
 one recognizes in this the emotion of sublimity. 
 
 Here, as before, we perceive that this idea, and the emo- 
 tion which accompanies it, are entirely different from the 
 simple perceptions by which they are occasioned. They 
 could not arise without the perceptions, and the perceptions 
 would be perfect without them. They are called forth un- 
 der peculiar circumstances in obedience to the principles 
 of our constitution, and, having once arisen, they rei:3ain 
 with us, irrespective of the circumstances that gave them 
 birth. 
 
 Having. how?ver, obtained this idea, with its corrfspond- 
 mg emotion, we find that it is excited by a variety of spirit- 
 ual conceptions, as well as external perceptions. The infi- 
 nite in space and duration, immaculate justice, heroic self 
 
MORAL SUGGESTIONS. IT!* 
 
 denial, self-sacrificing love, and a large rarietj of the more 
 majestic moral qualities, excite this emotion in a very higb 
 degree. How dissimilar soever thcj may be in themselves, 
 if they awaken this emotion we class them under the same 
 designation, and call them all sublime. Hence we speak 
 of the sublime in nature and in art, of the sublime in elo- 
 quence, in poetry, and in action. The external objects 
 which awaken this emotion are dissimilar, but, producing 
 a similar effect, we comprehend them all under the same 
 classification. \ 
 
 Of moral ideas derived from suggestion. \ 
 
 Thus far we have observed chiefly those suggested ideas 
 which may be derived from irrational objects. It would b« 
 natural to expect that suggestions of a peculiar character 
 would be occasioned by observing the actions of our fellow- 
 men, intelligent and accountable agents. 
 
 Thus, foi instance, I find myself in possession of a cer- 
 tain amount of power. I can move my limbs in any direc- 
 tion. Iknow, however, that these motions are not uncaused ; 
 they are consequent upon, and caused by, the energy of my 
 own will. I look further, and find that my will does not 
 act at random. I will to perform an action, in order to ac- 
 complish a certain purpose. So long as I am sane, that is, 
 governed by the established laws of my being, I find these 
 two antecedents, will and motive, always preceding everj 
 act of power which I exert. 
 
 If I observe the acts of others, I come to the same con- 
 clusion. I cannot conceive of an act of a man in a normal 
 condition, without considering it as emanating from his will ; 
 nor can I conceive of an act of the will uninfluenced by any 
 motive. Hence, when we contemplate the act of an intelli- 
 gent being, we always inv >lve in our conceptions not mer{ ,y 
 the outward change, but also the will in which it ori^i)iated 
 and tl^9 motive by which the will was governed 
 15* 
 
174 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 But c ir acts commonly influence the happiness, or aSocl 
 the ri<^hts of our fellow-men. Whenever we observe such 
 an act, there arises in the mind a wholly new idea, unlike 
 any which we have thus far examined ; it is the idea of 
 right or wrong. A particular quality in that action is im- 
 mediately recognized. Perception gives us nothing but the 
 eKternal act; but by virtue of our constitution there is sug- 
 gestol to U9 a moral quality, something very different from 
 the external action itself; and the cognition of this quality 
 is always attended by certain subjective affections. These 
 Bubjective affections are the most important of any of which 
 we are susceptible. The faculty of the mind which gives 
 rise to these objective cognitions and subjective affections 
 is called conscience. It belongs co moral philosophy to 
 treat of this subject at large. 
 
 I might mention various other instances of original sug- 
 gestion, but the above will suffice to illustrate my meaning. 
 It will, I think, be obvious, from what I have said, that, by 
 virtue of this power, we possess a distinct and most impor- 
 tant source of knowledge. The ideas which w^e derive iu 
 this manner are unlike those either of perception or con- 
 sciousness, yet they are no less truly clear and definite, 
 and really lie at the foundation of all our subsequent 
 knowledge. They seem, more than any other of our ideas, 
 to result from the exertion of the pure intellect. We 
 know them to be true, without the intervention of any 
 media. The intellect with which we are created vouches 
 f')r their truth, and we cannot conceive them to be false 
 
 If it be asked how we may improve this faculty, I answer 
 that m a matter so simple, when our knowledge is intuitive, 
 rules seem almost useless. \. few suggestions may, how- 
 ever, not be wholly without advantage. 
 
 It must he obvious to every one, that our train of 
 thought may follow in the line of our perceptions, or of oui 
 
ORIGINAL SUttQESTIONS. 
 
 17£ 
 
 laggestjona. We may pass from perception to perception 
 without heeding the suggestions to which they give occasion; 
 or. detaining every perception, we may follow out to theii 
 utmost e.xtent the suggestions which spring from it. The 
 former is the habit of the superficial, the latter of the re- 
 ilective mind. The one cognizes only the facts which are 
 risible on the surface ; the other arrives at a knowledge of 
 the hidden relations by which all that is seen is united 
 together and directed. Millions-of men, before Sir Isaac 
 Newton, had seen an apple fall to the ground, but the sight 
 awakened no suggestion ; or, if it did, the suggestion was 
 neither reUiined nor developed. He seized upon it at once, 
 followed It to its resultii, and found that he had caught hold 
 of the thread which could guide him through the labyrinth 
 of the universe. 
 
 If, then, we would cultivate the faculty of original sug- 
 gestion, we must exercise it by patient thought. Sugges- 
 tions will arise in our minds, if we will only heed them, 
 and they will arise the more abundantly the more carefully 
 we heed them. We should attend to our own intuitions, 
 e.xamiue their character, determine their validity, and follow 
 them io their results. We should have due respect for the 
 teachings of our own individual intelligence. What other 
 men have thought is valuable, but its chief value is, not to 
 save us from the labor of thinking, but to enable us to 
 think the better for ourselves. If. with patient earnestness, 
 we thus follow out the suggestions of our own minds, we 
 bhall find them enriched and invigorated. Instead of drink- 
 ing forever at the fountains of other men, the mind will 
 tbu« di.scov3r a fountain within itself " If," said Sir Isaao 
 Newton, " I am in any respect different from other men, it 
 is in the po^er of patient thought." 
 
176 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 OrigiD of moral ideas — Locke, Book 2. chap. 2, sees. 1, 2 ; book S( 
 ehap. 21, sec. 42 ; book 2, chap. 28, sec. 5. 
 
 Cousin, chap. 5. 
 
 Necessity of patient thought in sultivating orig'nal suggestion - LockJ 
 Bock 4, chap. 3, sec 22—30. 
 
 Abercnunbie, Put 4. as. 1. 
 
CBAPTER IV. 
 
 ABSTRACTION. 
 
 In 01 ler the more definitely to understand the nature ot 
 Abstraction, let us review the ground which we have passed 
 over, that we may the more distinctly perceive the point 
 from which we are about to proceed. 
 
 We have seen that by perception we cognize external 
 objects, and that by consciousness we cognize our internal 
 energies. Our knowledge, however, derived from both of 
 these sources, is individual and concrete. I perceive a tree ; 
 it is an individual tree. I perceive fifty trees ; they are all 
 indi"iduuls, differing in various respects from each other 
 but each a distinct and unique object of perception. So, 
 also, I am conscious of an act of memoiy, that is, of remem- 
 bering a particular object. I am conscious of remembering 
 another. Each act is numerically, and as I think of it, dis- 
 tinct from every other act. Our conceptions of these .acts 
 are of the same character as the acts themselves, and, with 
 these powers alone, every idea would be as distinct from every 
 other idea as the grains of sand on the sea-shore, without 
 either cohesion or fusibility. 
 
 The same remark applies in substance to the ideas dorivcJ 
 from oiiginiil suggestion. Of these ideas some I know aro 
 general, and can be referred to no particular object. Such 
 are the ide:\s of space, duration, infinity, and perhaps some 
 others. These are cognized as universal and uenessar) la 
 
178 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 soon as the mind begins to think ; and, as thej are at the 
 beginning, so they remain forever unsusceptible of either 
 change or modification. Another class of our suggestive 
 ideas is, however, of a different character. I ptrceivo, for 
 instance, a case of change, as the rolling of a ball, or the 
 falling of a pin. The idea of cause and power at once sug- 
 gests itself, but it is of the power requisite to produce thia 
 effect, and this only. It is the idea, not of causation in 
 general, but of causation in this individual instance. Should 
 I see another case of change, the same notion of causation 
 would arise, but it would again be of an individual change, 
 and would be wholly disconnected from that which I ob- 
 served before. That is, every idea of causation would be 
 indissolubly connocted with that change by which it was oc- 
 casioned, and thus our knowledge of causation would be 
 nothing more than the remembrance of these several isolated 
 and separate facts. 
 
 If, then, our intellectual powers were limited to those 
 which we have already considered, it is easy to imagine 
 what must be our condition. We could perceive individual 
 objects, and be conscious of tbe exertion of individual ener- 
 gies, or of the putting forth of certain intellectual acts. 
 Every object of perception would be distinct and discon- 
 nected, and equally so the conceptions which it originated. 
 Our knowledge would be all of individuals, and every object 
 must have its own proper name, or that which is equivalent 
 to it. When we speak of different men, we call them John, 
 James, William, meaning by each of these terms to desicr- 
 nato an individual unlike every other in existence. Such 
 would be our knowledge if we had no other faculties than 
 those already examined. 
 
 But, if we look into our own minds, and observe the minda 
 of other men, we find our condition to be the reverse of all 
 this. Proper names, or those used to designate individuala 
 
ABSTRACTION. 
 
 ITS 
 
 are the rarest words in a language. "We use them only to 
 point out persons and places, and when these are not alluded 
 to such words are never employed. In works of science 
 they have no place whatever, unless we find it necessary to 
 refer to some historical fact. Language is made up alto- 
 gcthsrof words designating classes of things, as book, house, 
 tree, idea ; or of qualities, as red, white, blue, warm, cold ; 
 or of actions, as walk, ride, think, give, take ; or of relationa, 
 as by, to, upon, &c. When we use these words we have 
 no reference to individuals, and desire merely to indicate 
 Classes of things, actions, qualities or relations, signified by 
 ';hese terms. So universally is this the case, that, when we 
 wish to individualize a particular object, we are obliged tc 
 use several descriptive terms, in order to distinguish it from 
 its class. Thus, if I wish to direct attention to a particular 
 table, I am obliged to refer to it as my table, of such a 
 color and size, or standing in such a place, or bought of 
 such a person. In this manner we select an individual 
 from a class, in order to make it an object of particular 
 attention. 
 
 Wri observe, then, Avhat our conceptions would be, were 
 we endowed with no other powers than those which we have 
 thus far considered. We see, on the other hand, what our 
 conceptions actually are. With no other powers than those 
 of perception, consciousness, and original suggestion, our 
 ideas would be all of individuals. But we find, in fsujt, that 
 they are the reverse of this— that they are all of classes. 
 We naturally inquire, How does Ais change take place? How 
 do we pass from the conception of individuals to the concep- 
 tior of generals 7 How, from single, isolated, concrete facts, 
 Jo wc form notions of classes, or of genera and species'; 
 [t is to this subject that we are now to direct our attention 
 
 Abstraction is that faculty of the mind by which froir 
 
180 INTELLECTUAL PfllLOSOPHr. 
 
 individual, concrete conceptions, we form general ana a<v 
 Btract ideas. 
 
 Though I speak of abstraction as a fiiculty of the mind, 
 1 am aware that it is, in manj respects, unlike those of 
 ■which I have thus far treated. It gives us no new knowl- 
 edge, like perception, consciousness and original suggestion ; 
 it only modifies the knowledge which we have acquired by 
 these faculties. It does not, like them, perform its office 
 by a single act. On the contrary, it accomplishes its object 
 by a succession of acts, each one different from both the 
 others. Yet^ as it performs a function which could be per- 
 formed by nc other power, — as it actually does something, 
 and as a faculty is the power of doing something, — I think 
 we cannot err in designating it by the same general name 
 which is given to the other intellectual energies. 
 
 In the mental process by which we pass from individuals 
 to generals, three separate acts can be distinctly perceived ; 
 these are analysis, g-eneralizaHon and comb'mation. 
 
 1. Analysis. I have remarked, when treating of concep- 
 tion, that we have the power of retaining a notion of any 
 object of perception after the object is removed, precisely 
 similar to that which we formed when we were perceiving 
 it. For instance, I saw a rose yesterday. I cognized it 
 then as present, and observed its color, form, magnitude, 
 as a distinct and concrete object, uniting in itself these 
 various and dissimilar qualities. I retain to-day a notion 
 of it as an object absent, uniting in itself all the various 
 qualities which I cognized in it as present. The difference, 
 subjectively, is merely between the notion of the objev3t 
 as presen*^^ and the notion of it as absent. Now, when I 
 make the conception of this rose an object of reflection, 1 
 nm able to separate, in thought, these qualities from each 
 other ; tliai is, to think of each quality separately, without 
 thinking of the others. Thus, I may think, exclusively, of 
 
ABSTRA\.TI0N. 18J 
 
 Its color, then of its form, its woiglit, & ^. ; at each tira: 
 banishing from my mind the conception of all the othei 
 qualities. I look upon a lily ; I form a conception of it in 
 the same manner, and in the same manner can I, in tbought, 
 separate its qualities one from the other, making each one 
 of tLera the exclusive object of attention. I behold a moun- 
 tain as present. I form a conception of it as absent. I can 
 think exclusively of its form, or its magnitude, or its color, 
 or its trees, or of the strata of which it is formed. The act by 
 which we thus, in thought, separate the elements of a con- 
 crete conception from each other, and consider each one by 
 itself as a distinct object of thought, is commonly termed 
 abstraction. I prefer to call it analysis, as this worr" suf- 
 ficiently designates its character, and distinguishes il ."rom 
 the other acts which with it go to make up the prooe & of 
 abstraction. 
 
 I wish it, how^ever, to be distinctly remembered, that this 
 act, in every ca.se, has for its object an individual conception. 
 I have analyzed my conception of a rose, and considered its 
 qualities separattly. But they are the qualities of this 
 particular '-ose, and nothing more. The case is the same 
 when 1 analyze a lily, or a mountain ; it is not the analysis 
 of any and every lily, or mountain, but only of that one 
 which I saw and of which I now form a conception. The 
 color is not the color of roses, or lilies, but only of this par- 
 ticuhir ro.se, or of that particular lily. The same remark 
 ap[>lics to the form, fragrance, or any other of its qualities. 
 It is just the same as if 1, for the first time, saw one of 
 tlnse objects, and were never to see it again. In thought, I 
 separate each one of its qualities from the other, and then 
 the mental act terminates. 
 
 2. Geiteralizution. By analysis I have separated the 
 qualities of an individual rose. Suppose I were called upcn 
 to give to each of them a name ; I could do it in no othei 
 IG 
 
IS2 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 manner than by designating each of them by tlie name o{ 
 the object from which the concrete conception was derived 
 I must call them, for instance, the color, the form, the fra 
 grance, the weight, of the rose A. But suppose, now, anothei 
 rose is presented to me. I analyze the conce[)tion which ] 
 have formed of it as before, and find it made up of color, 
 fcrm, fragrance, etc. These qualities now cease to be the 
 qualities of the rose A ; they become the qualities of the 
 roses A and B. I see a hundred roses. I analyze the con 
 ception3 which I form of them, and find the same qualities 
 jji each. These qualities cease, then, to be the qualities of 
 the roses A and B, but become the qualities of roses. 
 
 But I proceed further, and analyze the conception I have 
 formed of other objects, as, for instance, of a carnation, a 
 peony ; and I find that the color of the rose is also the 
 color of these flowers. I observe again, and find that 
 cherries and other fruits present the same color. It ceases, 
 then, to be the color of roses, or flowers, or fruits ; and, by 
 necessity, separating it from every object in which I per- 
 ceived it, I designate it by a particular name, and call it 
 red. Again ; I observe a violet : I analyze the conception 
 which I f)rm of it, and call the color, the color of this par- 
 ticular violet. I see several violets, all having the same color, 
 and then this color becomes to me the color of violets. I 
 observe monks-hood, and various other flowers, different 
 kinds of fruit, the heavens above mc, and many other objects 
 clothed in the same color ; and it is no longer the color of 
 B violet, or of violets. I give it a name to designate this 
 ^^articular quality, and call it blue. Henceforward I think 
 of It by itself, without any reference to all, or any, of the 
 objects in which I at first detected it. It forms, in my mind, 
 a distinct conception. Again ; I find that every object 
 which 1 perceive has a particular mode of addiessing the 
 eye Some are red, sorre are blue^ some are brown. I 
 
ABSTRACTIO!?. 183 
 
 (Onsider thi? impression, aside from the vdiioi' objects which 
 produce it, and give it a general name, color. 
 
 In this manner we form simple abstract 'detis of tho 
 several qualities which we observe We derive them origi 
 nally from individuals, in the manner above stated ; but we 
 conceive of them without respect to any individuals what- 
 ever. 
 
 When these simple abstract ideas are thus formed, they 
 constitute the alphabet which we use in thinking. As we unite 
 the letters of the alphabet into syllables, syllables into 
 words, and words into sentences and discourse, so these sim- 
 ple abstiact ideas, combined into tlie various forms of com- 
 plex conceptions, form the matter which we use in the exer- 
 cise of the powers of reasoning and imagination. 
 
 3 Combination. The process in this c;ise is exceedingly 
 obvious. Having obtained these simple abstract ideas, dis- 
 connected from any subject in whicli ihey originally existed.it 
 is manifestly in oar power to unite them together so as to form 
 any complex conceptions that we may desire. Thus, to 
 refer to the previous instances, I have formed simple abstract 
 ideas of red, blue, the form and the fragrance of a rose, the 
 color, form, and fragrance of a lily, or violet, the magnitude 
 and form of a mountain. It is evident that I may recom- 
 bine these different simple ideas just as I choose. I can. in 
 coni^eption, unite the form of a rose with the color of a lily, 
 and the fragrance of a violet. I should, then, have the 
 conception of a white rose with the perfume of a violet. I 
 can unite the idea of the form of a mountain with tiie color 
 red, and I then have a red mountain. I may combine tne 
 notim of red with the leaves and gre^n with the petals of a 
 TDse. and I have a green rose with red leaves, &c. 
 
 In this manner we are every moment forming conceptions 
 by means of language, either written or spoken. A few 
 iays since I read in a newspaper an account of a new varier.j 
 
134 INTEl.LECTUAL PHJLDSOPHT. 
 
 of roses -which had been discovered in North Carolina ; itt 
 peculiarity consisting in this, that the petals of tlie flowei 
 were green. I unite together the simple abstract ideas in- 
 dicated by the words, and I have almost as definite concep- 
 tion of it as if I had seen it. So, when any new j lant. 
 or animil, or work of art, is described to us, we immediutoly 
 unite the several simple ideas in the manner indicated by 
 our informer, and the conception stands befoi-e our miuda 
 like a reality. 
 
 From this view of the subject, we see that abstraction — 
 meaning by this term the three several acts entering into 
 this process — is indispensable to the formation of language. 
 To make the most simple affirmation by the use of proper 
 names, or individual concrete conceptions, such as they 
 are delivered to us by perception, consciousness, and orio^- 
 inal suggestion, is manifestly impossible. We must, by such 
 combinations as I have mentioned, form ideas designating 
 classes; or language could not exist. If we examine 
 the words of a language, we shall find that, except such as 
 designate simple ideas, they are all used to express a group 
 of ideas united under a single term. The definition of a 
 word analyzes it, and shows the various simple ideas of 
 which it is composed. Thus, if we take any words at ran 
 dom, as debtor, creditor, father, brother, friend, country 
 patriotism, treachery, murder, robbery, &c., we shall find 
 that each of them is composed of several distinct ideas. A 
 correct definition gives us every element that essentially 
 belongs to the compound conception. 
 
 We thus learn the manner in which the communication 
 of thought Is rendered practicable. A single word is made 
 the vehicle of ever so large a group of conceptions. If, in- 
 stead of using such words, we were obliged at length to 
 enumerate all the ideas which they designate, human inter- 
 course by language must cease. Th3 thought now expressed 
 
ABSTRACnON. 18r 
 
 fli a single sentence ^ould require pages ijt its develop- 
 ment, and the multitude of apparently disconnected ideaa 
 would render the comprehension of an ordinary statement 
 almost impossible. 
 
 From tliese illustrations of the nature of abstraction, it 
 appears that the exercise of this faculty may give rise to 
 two different classes of conceptions. The first chiss is 
 formed entirely in obedience to our own will. Having 
 formed simple abstract ideas, we have the power to unite 
 them together in just such compound conceptions as we 
 please. We may conceive of the magnitude of a mountain 
 with the form and color of a rose ; we have then a concep- 
 tion of a rose as great as a mountain. We may unite the 
 form of wings with that of a horse, and we have the concep- 
 tion of a winged horse. We may go further, and unite in 
 one complex conception various distinct images of b&iuty. 
 Thus, Milton, from various scenes which he had beheld, 
 selected those portions best adapted to his purpose, and 
 formed the complex conception of the Garden of Eden. So 
 the sculptor, from several specimens of the human form, 
 selects those features which seem best suited to his purpose, 
 and unites them in one conception more perfect than any 
 which he has seen in actual existence. When we use this 
 faculty for these purposes, we call it Imagination. 
 
 But we use this faculty for another purpose. By means 
 of it we form all our classifications of the objects of nature, 
 and hence it lies at the foundation of all natural science. 
 Here, however, we find it acting under different condi- 
 tions from those which we have last considered. The ele- 
 ments Df our complex conceptions were then subject to 
 nothing but the will. Our object was to please, and, if thia 
 was accomplished, our whole end was attained. Here, our 
 object is to instruct. We desire our classifications to coin- 
 cide with objects in nature, and if they do not our labor uf 
 16* 
 
1 ^6 INTELL3CTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 wcrse than tb.owu away. We are, therefore, restricted 
 in our materials to the matters of fact before us. In form- 
 ing a complex conception from nature, we must combine 
 precisely thuse elements which nature herself has combined, 
 and neither more nor less. In just so far as my coiiception 
 departs from the fact in nature, it is imperfect, superfluous, 
 or monstrous. If I am foi-ming a scientific conception of .1 
 lion, I must admit into it precisely those elements which 
 nature has united in this class of animals. If I form a con- 
 ception of a lion at will, I may add to it wings, any color 
 that pleases me, and any magnitude that will answer my 
 purpose. In the one case, we have the conception of a phys- 
 iologist; in the other, of an imaginative sculptor, such aa 
 designed the winged lions in the temples of Nineveh. 
 
 The manner in which we form the clussificutions of sci- 
 ence may, then, be easily illustiated. Suppose a physiol 
 ogist wishes to form a scientific conception of a horse. A 
 specimen is presented to him : he e.vatnines the outward 
 appearance of the animal, its form, color, motion : he dis- 
 sects it. and examines its internal structure tlie peculiarities 
 of its skfleton, the number of its bones, their position and 
 relations to each o;her. He takes note of these elements 
 with all the caie in his power. These vaiious simple ideas 
 belong to nothing but this individual specimen, the horse 
 A. Let another specimen be in a similar manner e.xam- 
 ined. He notes, as before, all its elementary ideas, and pro- 
 ceeds until he has satisfied himself that further investigation 
 is useless But these various elements have now ceased to 
 be the elements of any particular horse ; they are the ele- 
 ments of the class of animals whose character he is investi- 
 gating. 
 
 He ii nov desirous of uniting these several ideas into a 
 3onception that shall apj)ly not to one or another horse, 
 but to all horses. He compares these elementary ideaa, and 
 
ABSTRACTION 181 
 
 horses he has seen. Others of them ;ire inconstant : that is, 
 they belong to some, and not to others. He separates the 
 one from the other, uniting in one complex conception all 
 the consUint elements, and leaving out of his conceptien all 
 that are variable. For instance, the form of the skeleton, 
 the number of vertebrae, the structure and number of the 
 teeth, the organs of digestion, etc., are constant. These are 
 found to be the s;ime iu all. On the other hand, color, size, 
 ukI m:>.ny other elements, are variable. It is by the union 
 )f those coiist-int c:ualitics that he forms his general abstract 
 xiea of a horse, referring to no horse in particular, but being 
 ihe conception which answers in his mind to that word when 
 it is used either by himself or others. In this manner all 
 our j^e^icral conceptions, that is, conceptions comprehending 
 a numbar of similar objects, are formed. That we are 
 always c-ocucious of every step of the process. I do not affirm. 
 We are so continually performing this mental operation, that 
 we give no boed to the manner in which we proceed. If, 
 however, any tnc will pause, and observe his own mental 
 operations, I iLink he will hud them such as I have 
 attempted to describe. 
 
 I h^ve spoken of the mode in which our general abstract 
 conceptions are formed in matters of science. It is proper 
 to rtuark that all men, whether learned or unlearned, pro- 
 ceed precisely in the same manner. A common man. in 
 forming his notion of a horse, acts just like a physiologist 
 The only difference is, that the one is able to detect a 
 greater nui.iber of elementary ideas, and is the better able 
 to distinguish the constant from the variable. The one ob- 
 serves merely the elements which are obvious to the senses ; 
 the other, by dissocti'~n, ox:\n:in'is the organs whirh perform 
 ;he functions necess^vy *o tie o.vvtence of the animal. The 
 difference, then, is th.Ai v\3 ooav^ation of the one covers a 
 
188 INTELLtJTUAL THILOSOPHY. 
 
 larger field, and is m."di -with more minute accuracy, than 
 the other. Both, howev.r, depend on the same principleb, 
 and obey the same intellectual impulses. 
 
 It will be readily seen, from what has been remarkel, thit 
 abs'.raction, or the faculty by which we form classes, is indi&. 
 pcnsable to enumeration. Whenever we speak of any num- 
 ber of objects, we must first reduce them to a class. Thus, 
 if I were asked how many are there in this room, how 
 would it be possible to reply 7 I ask how many what I — 
 how many persons, or books, or chairs, or tables, or things ? 
 Until I know the class to which the objects to be enumer- 
 ated belong, I can never reply to the question. 
 
 I have thus explained the manner in which we form 
 general abstract conceptions, or conceptions of classes. Let 
 us examine the manner in which we proceed when we form 
 our conceptions of genera and species. 
 
 Let us take, for instance, our conception of horse ; it is a 
 conception formed by the union of all the constant elements 
 which we have found existing in that animal. Suppose I 
 proceed, and examine a zebra, an ass, an elephant. I form 
 general conceptions of these, as I did of the horse. I now 
 compare these several conceptions together, and find that 
 there are certain elements in which they all agree, while 
 each one has additional elements peculiar to itself. I com- 
 bine in one conception the elements which they all possess in 
 common, and gave to it the name pachydermata, which in- 
 cludes all these several classes. This general name distin- 
 guishes the genus, while the additional elements, by which 
 those subordinate classes differ from each other, maik the 
 species. Thus it may be said that these several classes of 
 animals form species, included in the genus pachydermata. 
 
 As we proceed in our investigations, we observe various 
 other classes of animals, as cainivora, rodcntia, and a mul- 
 titude of others. We compare tliose genera top;8ther, and 
 
ABSTRACTION. 189 
 
 Gn>3 tlia in certain elements, gradually grow ng less numer- 
 ous, tliey all ngree. I torui a larger class by uniting those 
 less numerous elements into a simple conception, aiui give 
 to that conception the name mammalia. Pursuing my 
 examination further, I find other classes of journals, as 
 numerous as mammalia, diflFering from them in many im- 
 portant respects, yet having one or more elements in com- 
 mon ; for instance, they all have vertebrae. I then form a 
 generic class by uniting in one conception the few and sim- 
 ple elements which they all hold in common. This forms 
 my widest and most comprehensive geneialization. 
 
 We see, then, that vertebrate comprehends under it an 
 immense number of individuals; that is, every one endowed 
 vsith this form. Under this are several subordinate classes, 
 each one {wsscssing this clement, and also something addi- 
 tional peculiar to itself, as mammalia, fishes, etc. If I now 
 take one of these second classes, I find that under it nie 
 several sub-genei-a, each one possessing all the elements of 
 the genus, and also some other elements by which it differs 
 from every other sub-genus. In this manner I descend, un- 
 til I come to the lowest species or variety, in which all the 
 iuilividuals are, in all constant elements, similar to each 
 other. In this manner we form the genera and species of 
 science. "We of course find that, the greater the number of 
 elements which enter into the idea of a class, the smaller is 
 the number of individuals under it ; and, on the other hand, 
 the smaller the number of elements in the idea of a class, 
 tlie greater the number of individuals which it comnre- 
 bends. 
 
 Fiom what we have here observed, we perceive the 
 difference between the process of investigation and of in- 
 struction. Ir investigat-on, we proceed fiom particulars to 
 generals ; we discover particular facts and reduce them tc 
 plaases. and then, going still further, comprehend ihcM 
 
190 INTELLECTS IL PEILO SOPHY. 
 
 classes under more general classes, until we have ai rived at 
 the widest genei-alizations in our power. But, when we 
 vMsh to instruct, or communicate knowledge to o1 hers, this 
 process is reversed. We then begin with the simplest and 
 most universal principles, comprehending the greatest num- 
 ber of individuals under them. From these we proceed to 
 the largest subordinate genera, from these to sub-genera or 
 species, until we have mastered the whole class of objects 
 which our most generic classification comprehends. At 
 each step, as we proceed downwards from the more to the 
 less general, we add some new elements, until we at last 
 arrive at the conception of the individuals, with which, ia 
 the labor of investigation, we commenced. 
 
 And hence we learn the nature of a definition in science. 
 
 When we define any scientific conception, we first men- 
 tion the genus to which it belongs, and then the specific 
 difference, or those other elements, which, being added to 
 the conception of the genus, designate its peculiar species. 
 Thus, in geometry, we define a figure as " any combination 
 of lines which encloses space." Here "combination of lines" 
 is the generic idea, and "enclosing space" is the specific 
 diifeience, or the element added to the generic idea which 
 n)akes out our conception of a figure. Again; "a plane 
 triangle is a figure bounded by three straight lines." 
 Here, again, "figure" denotes the genus, and "bounded 
 by three straight lines " is the specific difference, or the 
 element added to the conception of figure which gives us 
 the conception of the species, triangle. So, again, " a 
 right-angled triangle is a triangle one of whose angles is a 
 right angle." Here, again, "triangle" is the genus, and 
 'one of whose angles is a rig^t angle" is the specific dif- 
 fererxce, or the element added to the idea of triangle ^hicb 
 3reates the conception of a right-an;^ied triangle. 
 
 Hencej we see that simple cbjeLts, or those vhich have 
 
ABSTRACTION 1?] 
 
 00 parts, or into the conception of which no plurality of ele- 
 ments enters, can never he defined. Thvy can fuiiiisli nc 
 specific diflorencc, nor can tliey, by analysis of elements 
 be classed v,iihin any genus. In such cases, we are obliged 
 merely to describe the circumstances under which the object 
 i3 f resented to our cognition, or else place the subject him- 
 self under these circumstances. Thus, if we wish to make 
 known to any man a simple energy of the mind, we mention 
 the circumstances under which it arises; he refers to his 
 own experience, and instantly recognizes our meaning. If 
 he lias had no such experience, he can never anive at the 
 knowledge. Thus, I cannot define seeing to a blind mm, 
 for it is a simple act. I describe to him the circumstances 
 under which it occurs to me, but under the same circum- 
 stances he receives no impression. There is, therefore, an 
 -impassable gulf between us, so fir as this cognition is con- 
 cerned. The case is similar in all our simple cognitions. 
 
 The question has arisen, and formerly it was argued with 
 great bitterness, what is the object of our thought when we 
 furm a gener.il conception ? Thus. I think of animal, quad- 
 ruped, mammal, man, tree. etc. There is nothing in nature 
 answering to this conception, fur every individual posse.ss<;3 
 all the elements which enter into my conception, and also 
 many more. What, then, is the object of thought, when 
 we think any of these ideas? Some philosophers asserted 
 that there was an actual oljcct corresponding to this concep- 
 tion : and others, that, when we formed a general concei- 
 Iion. the only object wits the word which designated it. The 
 >ne class was called realists, the other nominalists. It ia 
 needless to enter into this discussion at present. It is evi- 
 dcnt that cf nception is a mode of thought, and that there ia 
 in this act nothing numerically di.^tinct ficm the mental 
 4Ct itself It is true, as Sir W. Hamilton has observed 
 ih»t we may in thought make a distinction between the fao 
 
V32 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 ulty or state of the mind in conception, and the concept cr no- 
 tion in which this act exhibits itself. But there is no exist- 
 ing thing numerically different ftom the act, and, therefore, 
 it seems evident that both nominalists and realists were 
 fw^ually wide of the truth. 
 
 I'rom these illustrations, I hope that the manner in which 
 TC form classes and general conceptions will be sufficiently 
 understood. It is, however, evident that this process iLay 
 be employed in a great variety of ways. Abstraction ena- 
 bles us to classify, but we may classify for diftcrent pur- 
 poses, and thus, under different circumstances, select differ- 
 ent elements as the basis of our classification. 
 
 It may be useful to mention some of the more common 
 and obvious principles by which our classifications are deter- 
 mined. 
 
 1. We very frequently form classes from our observation 
 of the external appearance, the form, color, magnitude, etc., 
 or from an examination of the internal structure. Thus, ag 
 I have before remarked, men classify the objects which they 
 behold, as animals, birds, etc., according to their external 
 appeaiance ; the pliysiologist classifies them by an examina- 
 tion of their internal stiucturc, and the manner in which 
 they perfoim the various functions necessary to life. Such 
 are, in gr^neral, the classifications in the various departments 
 of natural histoiy. 
 
 Here it is proper to remark that, having once formed our 
 ilassification, we naturally refer a new specimen to someone 
 of the clusses which we have found already existing. It seems, 
 however, strange, that, while knowledge is ever advancing, 
 men are disposed to believe, at every successive step, that 
 they have arrived at its ultimate limits. Yet such is mani- 
 festly the in6rmity of man. Hence it is that our classifi- 
 sations are fre(juently incorrect. Supposing, incautiously^ 
 that the classes which we have •ecosnized include all the 
 
ABSTRACTION. 193 
 
 ipecimcng or fill the facts that can exist, we are liable to 
 refer a new specimen or a new fact to a class to which it 
 does not belong. Thus the islanders of the Pacific, who 
 had never seen any other quadrupeds than hogs and goats. 
 upon seeing a cow, declared that it must be either a large 
 goat or a horned hog.- These being the only classes they 
 had ever observed, they naturally supposed that this new 
 specimen must be referred to either the one or the other. 
 This was the error of savages, but the same error is liable 
 to occur among philosophei-s. What is called accounting for 
 a phenomenon is nothing more than referring it to some 
 law, or general classification, under which it is compre- 
 hended. Thus, if I am asked why a stone falls tu the 
 earth, I account for it by replying that all matter is recipro- 
 cally attractive ; that is, I refer *his individual fact to a 
 general law, or the expression of a more general fact. 
 From the disposition to refer a new phenomenon to some 
 established law, philosophers as well as savages are exposed 
 tc error. In the case of philosophers, however, the error is 
 liable to be carried a step further. When they cannot 
 account for a phenomenon, — that is, when they know of no 
 class to which to refer it, — they not unfrequently deny its 
 existi nee ; taking it for granted that if they cannot account 
 for a phenomenon, it could not have occurred. It is for 
 this 3ause that every new discovery is oldiged to fight its 
 way to a place in science, against the whole influence of phi- 
 loso|.hic incredulity. So far as this leads to a more thorough 
 investigation of whatever claims to be a discovery, it is well 
 and reasonable ; but so far as it rejects whatever cannot be 
 accounted for as unworthy of examination and deserving 
 only of ridicule, it is neirher well nor reasonable, and ig 
 directly opposed to all tiue progress in science. Philoso- 
 phers woulil frequently be wise would tliey bear iu mind the 
 instruction of the poet : 
 17 
 
194 INTELLECTTAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 " There are more thiaga in heaTen and earth, Horatic, 
 Than are dreamed of in your philosophy " 
 
 2. Individuals may be classified by similarity of caase 
 Here we neglect entirely all consideration of external ap« 
 pearance or of internal structure, and, forming the concep* 
 tion of a particular cause, combine into one class every indi- 
 vidual to which that cause gives origin. Thus, the geologist 
 may arrange rocks into two classes, the one of which has 
 resulted from the action of fire, and the other from the 
 action of water. The physician may arrange diseasea 
 according to the causes which have produced them, one clasa 
 resulting from the affection of the nerves, another from the 
 affections of the lungs, the stomach, etc. 
 
 3, We may classify individuals from similarity of effects. 
 Here, omitting all consideration of appearance, structure, 
 and origin, we form a conception of a particular effect. 
 Having formed this conception, we comprehend under it 
 every individual which will produce the effects in question. 
 The physician arranges all the substances in the materia 
 medica on this principle. It matters not to him whether 
 the articles which he is examining belong to the animal, 
 vegetable or mineral kingdom. We classify them as nar- 
 cotics, stimulants, sudorifics, emetics, etc., according, solely, 
 to the effects which they are known to produce upon the 
 human organism. Thus, the critic classes objects in nature 
 or art according to the effect which they are known to pro- 
 duce upon the human mind. He calls a landscape, a meta- 
 phor, a picture, beautiful, graceful or sublime, as he observes 
 it to produce tlese particular emotions on the mind of man 
 
 It will appear, fr»,m these few illustrations, that the vari- 
 eties of classification are as numerous as the principles on 
 which classifications may be formed. Every art has ita 
 own principles, on which it classifies the substiinces oi* 
 which its labor is exerted The same individual may ihui 
 
ABSTRACTION. 19.1 
 
 be comprehei'Jevi under as miny different classes as tnere 
 are different conceptions formed in the minds of those who 
 contemplate it. The physician, the botanist, and the poet, 
 may all examine the same plant, and each will assign it tc 
 a different class, according to the controlling ideas by which 
 his classification is governed. 
 
 It is obvious that a faculty, which enters so essentially 
 iiito all the modes of thought, must greatly influence our 
 intellectual character. This will be rendered the more evi- 
 dent if we consider the separate acts which form the pruccsa 
 of abstraction, and observe the manner in which the pre- 
 dominance of either affects the tlemencs of our intellectual 
 constitution. 
 
 1. Analysis. This power to detect and distinguish froix 
 each other all the various qualities of an external object, 
 and all the various changes of a material or a spiritual phe- 
 nomenon, is frequently denominated acuteness of observa- 
 tion. It is essentially what we have spoken of under thi« 
 name of analysis. Its importance to a thinker or discoverer 
 is manifest. As every variety of external appearance iudi- 
 cates a modification of internal quality, and as every varia- 
 tion in the process of a change indicates some alterjtion 
 in the condition of the cause, it is obvious that this [/ower 
 must be of prime importance to a philosopher. He who 
 is best able to analyze the constituent elements of the ob- 
 jects to which his attention is directed, whether in the world 
 within or the world without, is the most rid ly provided 
 with the materials for accurate judgment. It is thus that 
 an accurate observer frequently detects facts which result in 
 'mportant discoveries, that ha e always been w thin the 
 reach of his contemporaries, but which had never l)eforo 
 attracted their attention. From the want of this power, the 
 effects of one cause are sometimes ascribe<l to another : im- 
 portant causes are undetected ; cause axid effect, antecedent 
 
196 tNTLLLECTUAL PHI. OSOPHY. 
 
 and oor sequent, are blendd together ; and, in generai, 
 reseaich becomes vague, unsatisfactory, and unw:>rthy of 
 reliance. He, then, -who desires to attain to accuracy of 
 philosophical inquiry, should strive to cultivate this powei 
 to the greatest perfection. Nor is this all. By this instru- 
 ment we are able to detect sophistry, and lay bare the 
 insuflSeient foundations of all false reasoning. It was from 
 Want of acuteness of observation that Locke fell into many 
 of his most important errors. The value of this endow- 
 ment is also conspicuously seen in the review of his Philos- 
 ophy, by Cousin, an author of surpassing mental acuteness. 
 This power has always been largely developed in those fa- 
 vored individuals who have made the most important addi- 
 tions to our knowledge of the laws of nature. 
 
 2. Of different, hut not inferior, importance to a culti- 
 vated mind, is the power of generalization. Acuteness of 
 observation will discover new facts, and observe changes 
 heretofore unknown ; it will analyze what is concrete, and 
 unravel what is complicated ; but it will do no more. If 
 we possess only this power, we may do important service to 
 science by collecting valuable materials ; but we shall col- 
 lect them only that they may be wrought into philosophical 
 laws by the genius of others. Besides this, therefore, ar 
 inquirer after truth needs a power which, having discovered 
 an important relation, shall enable him to detect it under 
 whatsoever changes of condition it may be hidden. He will 
 \hus be able to arrange under each class those individuals 
 which the Creator himself has arranged under it, and trace 
 out a given cause through all the diversities of time and 
 place to which its influence may have extended. Probably 
 no power of the human mind has been so fertile in discov- 
 ery as this. From a single observation of an hitherto un- 
 noticed phenomenon, or from the minute and almost micro- 
 Bcopic experi'Jients of the laboratory, the philas<:>pher ifl 
 
ABSTRACriON. 
 
 197 
 
 »t)le frequently to enunciate a law wliicli controls the most 
 imponant changes of the universe. It was thus that Sii 
 Isaac Newton, having accurately determined the law which 
 governed the fall of an app}.e, at once began to generalize 
 this idea. If this law governs bodies at small distances 
 from the earth, why should it not govern bodies at great 
 distances 7 If it governs bodies at great distances from tho 
 "sarth, why may it not reach to the moon, and govern lier mo- 
 tion in her orbit 7 and if the moon in relation to the earthy 
 why not the earth and planets in relation to the sun 7 Thus, 
 by following out this elementary law, the germ was evolved 
 of the greatest discovery recorded in the annals of science. 
 In a similar manner, Dr. Franklin made himself acquainted, 
 by experiment, with the laws of the electric fluid. He observed 
 the phenomena of lightning in the thunder-cloud. Compar- 
 ing them together, and making due allowance for the difler- 
 ence between the vastness of nature and the littleness of 
 man, he detected the same elementary phenomena in both, 
 and the question at once occurred to him. Are they not 
 identical 7 A simple experiment decided the question in 
 the affirmative, and added a wide domain to the empire of 
 human knowledge. It was also a rare combination of these two 
 powers of observation and generalization that gave to Cu- 
 vier the first place among the naturalists of his own, and. 
 perhaps, of every age. 
 
 3. Intellectual character is also affected by the degree in 
 which we are endowed with the power of combination. 
 
 I have already remarked that the power of combination 
 nay be either poetic or scientific ; that is, that we may 
 form cur combinations at will, or they may be limited by 
 the objects in nature from which they are derived. Tiiis 
 difference of endowment distinguishes the class of IMiltun 
 and Shakspeare from that of Newton and Franklin. 
 
 But, passing this general distinction, it is evident that 
 17* 
 
103 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 the po\Nvr 01 g.ientific combination is possessed \>j m^n ifi 
 very unequal degrees. Suppose a philosopher to have ob 
 served with accuracy a series of phenomena. He has them 
 before him, — the facts and the order of their succession. 
 He knows that under the same conditions the same sucoes- 
 gi'^n will be repeated. But this :s not enough. What are 
 the unseen changes of which these phenomena are the m?n- 
 ife,stations ; and what are the relations which they sustain 
 to each other 7 In a word, what is the rationale of these 
 several changes ? As, for instance, he places a piece of wood 
 on the fire ; it inflames and bums to ashes. The facts are 
 visible and common, and he knows that another piece of 
 woo<l, under the same conditions, will be subject to the same 
 changes. But what is the rationale of these changes 1 
 What is combustion 7 What is flame ? What is ashes 7 
 What are the combinations formed and dissolved during the 
 change of wood to a substance so utterly unlike itself 7 
 Here, then, is a demand for philosophical combination. 
 The ne.Kt step is to form a conception of such unseen causea 
 as will be sufiicient to account for the phenomena. 
 
 The power of forming such conceptions exists in very 
 different degrees. Some men merely observe the facts, and 
 give themselves no trouble to ascertain the cause. Others, 
 in seeking for a cause, form conceptions after the manner of 
 the poets, which have no relation to established laws, and 
 can never be verified by observation or experiment. Ho 
 ■who is endowed with true philosophical genius seems 
 instinctively to originate combinations analogous to truth, 
 ffhich become the immediate precursors to discovery. I do 
 QOt say thai there is anything of the nature of pro )f in a 
 conception of this kind, only that it serves to direct the 
 inquiiies of the original investigator. Having fojmed hia 
 conce[>tion, his next business is to prove it to be true. 
 When he has done this, his discovery is made. Without 
 
ABSTRACTION. 19|» 
 
 proof, nothing has yet been determined ; but without some 
 coQceptiou to direct i)ivcstigation. there could be no proof 
 for there would be nothing to prove. Sir Isaac Newton and 
 Sir Humphrey Davy seem to me to have been richly en- 
 dowed with the power of scientific combination. On the 
 other hand, Dr. Priestley, though an eminent philosopher, 
 seems to have possessed it in a very imperfect degree. 
 Though his discoveries were numerous, and of the highest 
 importiince, yet all his theories of the changes which he 
 observed have long since been exploiled. 
 
 The power of philosophical combination, of necessity, 
 improves witli the progress of science. As the laws of 
 nature and her modes of operation are better understood, we 
 form conceptions more and moi'e analogous to truth. We 
 learn to think more and more in harmony with the ideas of 
 the Creator ; and, from a larger and more accurate acquaint- 
 ance with the known, we are the better able to unravel the 
 mysteries of the unknown. When it was observed that 
 water woul«l rise in a pump, the solution of the phenomenon 
 at first said to be given was that nature abhorred a 
 vacuum. \\''hen it was found that it would not rise more 
 thai, thirty-two feet, this fact was explained by the theory 
 that mture 'lid not abiior a vacuum for more thin thirty- 
 two feet. Can it be that any of the hypotheses of the present 
 day will seem as strange to our successors as this theory 
 docs to us ? 
 
 With regird to the improvement of this faculty, a few 
 rords nay be added at the close of this chapter. Let ug 
 refer to each of the three acts into which abstraction haa 
 been divided. 
 
 Analysis, or the power of distinguish'ng and separating 
 from each otlier things which differ, may be employed 
 either objectively or subjectively, as we are inquiring into 
 
200 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 the qualities and relations of the world without ns or th* 
 energies and relations of the world within us. 
 
 So far as the accurate observation of the external woild 
 is concerned, much depends upon the delicacy of our senses. 
 but probably no less upon the earnest attention with which 
 ye use them. A listless, careless observer never discovers 
 anything. It is only by an intense direction of tho mind to 
 the objects of our inquiry, that we are able to detect changes 
 and relations which have been hidden from preceding 
 observers. Truth reveals herself not to those who pay her 
 mere formal and perfunctory service, but to those who 
 render to her the earnest and heartfelt homage of the whole 
 soul. 
 
 Acuteness in the analysis of mental phenomena requires 
 an equal earnestness, though it is differently directed. We 
 here find it necessary to cultivate the habit of withdrawing 
 from all external objects, and fixing our attention on the 
 revelations of our own consciousness. Few men can do this 
 without long-continued and patient effort. With sucr 
 effort, however, most men can attain to it. We must learn 
 to look calmly and steadily upon a mental phenomenon. If 
 there appear m it the slightest indications of complexity ; 
 if, when examining it from different points of view, the least 
 shade of difference be cognizable in our consciousness ; or, 
 if, on comparing two forms of thought, which seemed to us 
 identical, there arises within us the intellectual feeling of 
 dissimilarity, we must pause until we are thoroughly satis- 
 fied on the subjects of our inquiry. It is by listening to 
 the first suggestion of a difference, that we learn to deter- 
 mine the character and relations of our mental phenomena. 
 
 If we would enlarge our power of generalization, I know 
 of no better method than to study the generalization.! of 
 nature. Admirable lessons of this sort are found in the 
 natm-al sciences, — chemistry, physiology, geology, etc. N'c 
 
ABSTRACTION. 201 
 
 finer exercise for the power of generalization can It desired, 
 thiinto take a single important chemical law, and trace out 
 Its operations on the vast and the minute throughout the 
 kingdom of nature. Having become familiar with these 
 wide-spreading classifications, we shall be the better able to 
 pursue the generalizations of the subjective. We may then 
 take an intellectual or moral law. and, having clearly marked 
 out its nature and limitations, follow out its effects on the 
 character of individual and social man. The light which 
 will thus dawn on the mind will frequently astonish the 
 student himself Patient thought in this direction will 
 furnish explanations of phenomena, and suggest rules of 
 conduct, which would hardly reveal themselves to any other 
 mode of investigation. 
 
 To improve the power of philosophical combination, we 
 nped. most of all, to study the actual combinations of nature. 
 The more familiar we become Avith them, the clearer will be 
 the light shed upon the unknown. Much may also be 
 learned from the lives of those who have been so fortun-ite 
 as to extend the limits of human knowledge. By observing 
 the manner in which they have labored, we may hope to be 
 able to follow their example. This subject will, however, 
 come again under consideration, when, in a subsequeut 
 chapter, we treat of scientific imagination. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Abstraction — Locke, Book 2, chap. 11, sections 9, 6, 10, 11 ; chaptei 
 12, section 1 ; Stewart, voL i., chapter 4 ; Reid, Essay 5, ehapters 2, 3, 
 
 Mhy most words general — Locke, Book 3, chap. 3, ac-jtions 1 — 10 
 
 Beid, Essiy 5, chap. 1. 
 
 8imple words not definable -Locke, Book 3, chap. 4, BOitions 4—11 
 Nominalism and Re.ilisir -Cousin, sect. 6, last part ; liuwarl wa> i 
 
 ■bap. 2, sections 2 and H 
 
CHAPTER V. 
 
 ME^IORY. 
 
 8SCTI0N I. — ASSOCIATICN OF IDEAS, OR A IRilN 01 
 TIIOUGUT IN THE MIND. 
 
 The next faculty which we shall consider is Memory. 
 As, however, its nature cannot be unfolded without a knowl- 
 edge of the laws which govern the succession of thought in 
 the mind, we shall devote to this subject a preliminary 
 section. 
 
 Every person is conscious of the fact that, during his 
 waking hours, his mind is continually engaged in thinking 
 Were any one to ascertain that an hour, or even a few 
 minutes, had elapsed, in which he had been conscious of no 
 thought, he would know that, unless he had fallen asleep, he 
 must have been affected with some disease which had for the 
 time paralyzed his intellectual powers. 
 
 And yet more ; we are all conscious that it is impossible, 
 without severe and long-continued effort, to fix the mind 
 continuously upon any particular thought. It naturally, 
 and without effort, passes fiom one idea to another, and it 
 re^iuires a determination of the will to detain it upon any onf 
 subject. No interval seems to intervene between one 
 thought and another. They succeed each other without any 
 volition on our part, and frequently take a direction whici4 
 we strive in vain to control. A train of thought will some 
 
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS. 203 
 
 times seize upon the mind, and we are unable to disengage 
 it. We strive to turn our attention to other objects, and, 
 nfter repeated and strenuous efforts, succeed but imperfectly. 
 And in general it may be remarked, that he has attained 
 to uncommon intellectual self-discipline who is able to think 
 at will, and for any considerable length of time, upon any 
 subject that he chooses. 
 
 But, while all this is true, it is, on the other hand, true 
 that our thoughts do not follow each other at random. There 
 are what may be called laws ^f connection, by which their 
 succession is governed. Whenever an unusual idea occurs 
 to U5, nothing is more common than to inquire for the reason 
 of its appearance at that particular time and place. We 
 take it for granted that it could not have occuired to ug 
 without being related to some other idea previously existing 
 in t''.e mind. We, therefore, refer back to the thoughts which 
 were just before present to our consciousness, and endeavor 
 to tnvce some connection between them and that for whose 
 origin we are inquiring. 
 
 This fact may be abundantly illustrated by our own expe- 
 rience. The following examples will recall other instances 
 to our recollection. Mr. llobbes relates, in his Leviathan, 
 that, upcn some occasion, several gentlemen were engaged 
 .'n a conversation respecting the civil war. One of them 
 i.brujAly inquired the value of a Roman denarius. The 
 question sounded oddly, and strangely at variance with the 
 subject under discussion. Mr. Hobbes relates that, on a little 
 reflection, he was led to trace the train of thought which led 
 to the inquiry. The subject of conversation, the civil war, 
 naturally led the mind to the history of Charles I. The 
 remembrance of the king suggested the treachery of those 
 who delivered him up. Tlie treachery in this case intro- 
 duced the treachery of .Judas Iscariot. The crime of Judai 
 waa at on:e associated with the price for which it was com- 
 
204 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 mitted, and hence the question what was the value of i 
 Roman denarius- 
 Stewart give^ an illustration from the voyage of Captain 
 King, the companion of Cook, of the power of a single 
 ol'joct to awaken a train of reflection. " While we wcie at 
 dinner in this miserable hut, on the banks of the river 
 Awatska. tlie guests of a people with whose existence we 
 had before been scarcely acquainted, and at the extremity 
 of the habitable globe, a solitary half-worn pewter spoon, 
 whose shape Avas familiar to us, attracted our attention -, 
 and, on examination, we found it stamped on the back with 
 the word London. I cannot pass over this circumstance 
 in silence, out of gratitude for the many pleasant thoughts, 
 the anxious hopes, and tender remembrances, it excited 
 in us. Those who have experienced the effects that long 
 absence and extreme distance from their native country pro- 
 duce on the mind, will readily conceive the pleasure such 
 a trifling incident can give." 
 
 A touching incident, illustrative of the same principle, is 
 related by Mrs. Judson in her reminiscences of her late hus- 
 band. During Dr. Judson's long captivity, in the death 
 prison at Ava, his heroic wife, intending to create an agree- 
 able surprise, had taken great pains to prepare an article 
 of food that might cheer his spirits by reminding him of 
 home. " In this simple, homelike act, this little unpretend- 
 ing effusion of a loving heart, there Avas something so touch- 
 ing, so illustrative of what she really was, that he bowed hia 
 head upon his knees, and the tears flowed down to the chains 
 about his ankles. Presently the scene changed, and there 
 came over him a vision of the past. He saw again the home 
 ©f his boyhood. His stern, strongly revered feather, hia 
 r;c7itle mother, his rosy, curly-haired sister and p'llo yoyjig 
 biother, were gathered for the noonday meal, and he wai 
 once more among them. And so his fancy rebelled tbera 
 
AS30CIA.TI0N OF IDEAS. 205 
 
 I'inally, he lifted his head, an>l the misery that sur- 
 rounded him ! lie moved his feet, and the rattling of the 
 heavy chains was as a death-knell. He thrust the care- 
 fully prepared dinner into the hands of his associate, and 
 as fa^t as his fetters woull permit, hurried to his c ^n little 
 sh3d"--yol. i, pp. 378-9. 
 
 Il is unnecessary to illustrate more fully the general fact 
 that our ideas thus follow in succession independently of our 
 will. We may remark, still further, that when thought fol- 
 lows thought without any connection, we recognize it imme- 
 diately as a proof of insanity. To say of another that he 
 talks incoliereidly, is to say that he is not in his right mind. 
 Without any knowledge of the laws of mental association, 
 we, in this manner, intuitively distinguish a normal from an 
 abnormal state of the intellect. Thus, in the annual report 
 of the Massachusetts General Hospital for 1853, one of the 
 patients is referred to as continually talking after the fol- 
 lowing manner ; "I have a commission as a justice of the 
 peace, and an asparagus bed. I like lightning best at a dis- 
 tance. Whoever puts his name on paper in the Wiscasset 
 Bank, has a maik on his forehead, and is worse off than if 
 he was dining with one of the selectmen. Look out." 
 
 It is obvious, then, that our thoughts follow each other 
 in a train subjected to certain general laws, and that they 
 only move at variance with these laws when the mind is in 
 an abnormal state. 
 
 Tlic laws by which the tram of thought is governed, or. 
 as they are called, the laws of association, are of two kinds, 
 objective and subjective. The objective laws are those arising 
 Q'om the relations which our thoughts sustain to each other ; 
 the subjective arise from the relations whicli our thoughtg 
 sustain to the thinking sul)ject. Among the objective laws 
 are luimbered resemblance, contrast, contiguity, and causf 
 ♦ni eAect : auv ng the subjective are. interval )f time, fro 
 
106 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 quencj of repetition, coexistent emotion, and the menta. 
 Londiticm of the particular individual. 
 
 I. Of the ohjectice laws of ctssociadnn. 
 
 1. Resemblance. Every one knows that when we are 
 thinking of any interesting object or event, other objects or 
 events in any respects similar to it, naturally present them- 
 lekes. If we look, for the first time, upon a river in a 
 fceign land, we instantly recall some river in our own cc un- 
 ify which it resembles ; and we are never as well satisfied 
 13 when we find a marked similarity between them. We 
 never pass over ridges of snow-clad mountains without be- 
 ing reminded of the x\lps. When we visit a battle-ground, 
 Tf/e find rising up within us the recollection of other buttles 
 which may have resembled it in the fierceness of the con- 
 test, the number of the slain, the principles which nerved 
 the different combatants, or the results which flowed from 
 the action over the destinies of humanity. This universal 
 tendency is seen in the manner in which we designate 
 remarkable events by giving to them the name of some re- 
 markable event of a similar character. Thus any battle in 
 which a small number of patriots have resisted a host 
 of invaders is called a Thermopyl;^ or a Marathon. A 
 distinguished general is called an Alexander or a Julius 
 Cjesar, a patriot is a Washington. These instances all illus- 
 trate the facility with which one event suggests to us an- 
 other which resembles it. 
 
 If however, we examine the cases which we associate 
 b; lesemblance, we shall find them to be of tv.o kinils. 
 Sometimes we associate objects by resemblance in their ex- 
 ixirnal qualities. Thus, when we see a vast mountain, we 
 think of Mont Blanc, Chimborazo, or the Himalayas. We 
 rompare a vast river to the Mississippi or the Amazon. So, 
 when distinguished men are mentioned, we are continually 
 compaiing them together, if, in the'r character or circum 
 
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS. 207 
 
 itanocfl. there bv anj elements of similarity. Hence Crom« 
 well and Naptlton, Charles I. and Louis XVI.. Pitt and 
 Fox, Scott and Byron, are so commonly spiken of in con 
 ncctiv?n. In fact, a large portion of our conversation con- 
 sists of comparisons of this character. 
 
 Another mode of association belonging to the same class, 
 but a source of far greater pleasure, is that in which objects 
 and events are connected, not by resemblance in their ex- 
 ternal appearances, but by their effects. Here the mind 
 is delighted, not simply by the addition of another image in 
 itself beautiful, but by the peculiar effect of novelty and 
 unexpectedness. Thus Ossian describes the oiusic of his 
 Qiinstrel by saying, '' The music of Caryl, like the memory 
 )f joys that are past, was pleasant yet mournful to the soul." 
 Uere the objects themselves, music and a recollection, are 
 Bntirely unlike ; but, agreeing in the effect which they pro^ 
 duce, we derive a peculiar pleasure from associating them 
 together, and we are conscious that the pleasure is greatei 
 from the fact that the resemblance is unexpected. Thu.'i 
 Job compares his friends to a brook in the desert, wliich, in 
 3ummer, wlien it is most needed, is diied up. and disappoints 
 the hope of those who relied upon it for succor. There ia 
 QO similarity here in the objects themselves. A man can- 
 not reseml)le a brook. In one thing, however, ihey are 
 alike : they disappoint hope. Hence the beauty of the figure. 
 It is on this circumstance that the success of metaphorical 
 language depends. Hence the rule of rhetoricians, that 
 those metapliors are most beautiful in which the objects 
 themselves are most dissimilar, while in the effects which 
 they proiluce, or the point in which (hey are compareil. they 
 are the most alike. Hence the beauty of the passage in 
 Longinus, in which he compares the Iliad of Homer to the 
 xucridian sun, and the Odyssey to the sun at his setting, 
 when the magnitude is increased, but the effulgence is di- 
 minished 
 
£08 INTELLECTUAL IfllLOSOPHT. 
 
 2. Contrast. We find ourselves frequently associating 
 Ideas on the principle of contrast ; that is to say, one idea 
 at one time suggests to us another which resembles it ; at 
 another, an idea exactly opposite to it. Thus, happiness 
 frequently recalls to our mind the idea of misery, as in the 
 verse of Young : " How sad a sight is human happiness ! ' 
 Height and depth, power and weakness, greatness and little- 
 ness, poverty and riches, the palace and the hovel, the cra- 
 dle and the grave, are mutually suggested by each other. 
 Hence in rhetoric the frequent use of antithesis. 
 
 As I remarked respecting resemblance, that it may be 
 either in external appearance or in effect, the same is true 
 of contrast. We here derive pleasure from contemplating 
 similarity of external appearance, while the effects are 
 exceedingly unlike. Thus, in the beautiful passage from 
 Milton's Comus : 
 
 " I have often heard 
 My mother Circe, with the sirens three, 
 Amidst the flowery kirtled naiades. 
 Culling their potent herbs and baleful drugs, 
 Who, as they sung, would take the prisoned goHi 
 And lap it in Elysium. Scylla wept 
 And chid her barking waves into attention. 
 And fell Charybdis murmured soft applause. 
 Yet they in pleasing slumber lulled the sense. 
 And, in sweet madness, robbed it of itself ; 
 But such a sacred and homefelt delight. 
 Such sober certainty of waking bliss, 
 I never heard till now ' ' 
 
 CoMus, 254—262. 
 
 3. Contiguity. This may be either of time or place. 
 
 1. Of time. When we reflect upon any event, we natur- 
 ally find our attention called to other events which occurred 
 Bt the same period. When we think of a distinguished man, 
 we always recall his cotemporaries. Whoever thinLs of 
 Johnson without finding him surrounded, in our concei'tion 
 
ASSOCIATICN OF IDEA3. 209 
 
 5y Boswell, Goldsmith, Garrick Burke, and Sir Joshua 
 Reynolds ? When we think of ]S:ipoleon, we sai round him 
 with his marshals, and the sovereigns whose destmies he so 
 greatly changed. An event of historical importance sug- 
 gests the events contiguous to it in time. The advent of 
 our Saviour could hardly be thought of wi hout leading u& 
 to reflect upon the condition of Rome, and of the then civ- 
 ilized world. Hence we learn the appropriateness of the 
 rule, in the study of history, to fix definitely in cur minds 
 the culminating events in each particular era, an:l then the 
 contemporaneous occurrences will easily group themselves ia 
 their proper places. 
 
 2. Contiguity in place. "When any important place is 
 visited or thought of, it at once suggests to us the other places 
 in its vicinity. Who can think of Jerusalem, and not think 
 of the hills of Calvary, the mount of Olives, the garden of 
 Gethsemane 7 Who can think of Waterloo without thinking 
 of Brussels, and Quatre Bras, and the localities in the neigh- 
 borhood, on the possession of which the issue of the contest 
 80 frequently turned ? It is on this account that we survey 
 with such impassioned interest any spot from which, at an 
 earlier age, have emanated influences which have been deeply 
 fell in the liistory of our race. The sentiments of Johnson 
 at lona find a response in the bosom of every cultivated 
 mind, " We were now treading that illustrious island 
 ■which was once the luminary of the Caledonian regions, 
 whencv savage clans and roving barbarians derived the ben- 
 efits of knowledge and the blessings of religion. To abstract 
 the mind from all ocal emotions would be impossible if it 
 wore endeavored, and would be foolish if it were possible. 
 Whatever withdraws us from the power of the senses, what- 
 ever makes the past, the distant, or the future, prcdomimiie 
 over the present, advances us in the dignity of thinking 
 beings. Fur from me and from my fiiends he mch frigid 
 18* 
 
<J10 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHV 
 
 philosophy as mav conduct us indifferent and unraovel cvei 
 any ground which has been dignified by wisdom, bravery, 
 or virtue. That man is little to be envied whose patriotism 
 would not gain force upon the plain of Marathon, or whoso 
 piety would not grow warmer among the ruins of lona." — 
 Juinney to tlit Western Islands. 
 
 Ilcnce we perceive the reason why names of places, per- 
 sons, etc., frequently add so much vivacity to style. In- 
 stead of an abstract and it may be disconnected idea, they 
 present us with a visible image, surrounded by a multitude 
 of associate ideas. Thus, when we wish to render impress- 
 ive the idea of successful resistance to oppression, we refer 
 to particular localities, as Runnymede, Nascby, Lexington, 
 Bunker Hill, or Yorktown. And hence we learn that the 
 Rtudy of histoiy should always be connected with that of 
 geography; that is, we should study history with the map 
 before us We thus associate events with localities, and 
 remember them more perfectly, as well as comprehend them 
 more accurately. 
 
 4. Cause and effect. I have already, when treating of 
 original suggestion, referred to the fact that the observation 
 of a change always leads us to ask for the cause. In tho 
 same maimer, when we observe the manifestation of power, 
 we instinctively ask for the results which have followed it. 
 We associate in obedience to this universal tendency. If we 
 think upon the reformation by Luther, we naturally think 
 of tlie caujes which led to it, and strive to trace out its con- 
 sc'iupnces. If we think of the landing of the Pilgrims, we 
 ask oui-selves what causes could have led them to forsake the 
 couifcrts of a civilized home, and plant themselves, in mid- 
 winter, upon a continent inhabited only by savages; and, 
 before we have answered this inquiry, we find ourselves 
 turning to the changes which this event has wrought upon 
 the destinies of the world So, when, for the fii-st time, I 
 
A530CIATI0N OF IDEAS. iill 
 
 observe a philosopliical experiment, I am wholly unsiitisfied 
 aiitil I understuuti tlie rationale of the changes which it pre- 
 sents. I see, for instance, a t;\per lighted, when placed in 
 the focus of one concave mirror, if a heated cannon-ball is 
 placod in the other, though the taper is carefully protected 
 from the diiect rays of the ball. It is a disagreeable puzzle 
 until the doctrine of the radiation of caloric is explained t<. 
 me. As soon as this is done, my mind is at ease, and I 
 proceed at once to explain other phenomena by the applica- 
 tion of the same principle. Now, it is obvious that, this 
 connecf.on having been thus established, either one of these 
 ideas will almost infallibly suggest the other. The law of 
 caloric radiation will suggest the effect which has been men- 
 tioned, and the effect will suggest to us the law. So, hav- 
 mg examined the causes which led to the first settlement of 
 tliis country, and the consequences which have flowed from 
 It, either one will bring to our mind the other, almost as a 
 matter of necessity. It will readily occur that, as this is a 
 permanent relation, like causes always producing like effects, 
 this mode of association must be one of the most iinportaut 
 m. ms of enlarging and retaining our knowledge. 
 
 It will be easily porceival that these various forms of 
 objective association intermix with and modify each other. 
 Thus, the relation of cause and effect would naturally asso- 
 ciate two events together; the association by resemblance 
 would recall similar causes, and that by contrast, causes and 
 effects of a dissimilar character; while events connected by 
 the relation of contiguity of time and place would be mere 
 iikcly to occur to us than events remote and Icng since 
 passed away. Thus, were I thinking of the landing of the 
 Pilgrims, I would naturally think of the causes which led 
 tc this event ; resembhince wouhl lead me to think of simi- 
 lar cases of colonization, and contrast would bring to mj 
 recollection other instar xs in which men had left their ua? 
 
212 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY 
 
 tive country, for love of adventure or thirst for gold. As 1 
 traced the results, I "would naturally compare those which 
 resembled the enterprise of the Pilgrims with those oiigin- 
 ating in a dissimilar cause ; and. as the most contiguous ia 
 'jrae and place. I wou'i naturally turn to the states of 
 South America, and contrast the causes and effects of these 
 two modes of colonization together. In this manner, by the 
 blending of these various forms of association, a vast range 
 of thought is opened before us ; •while, at the same time, it 
 is always under the control of established and recognized 
 laws. 
 
 II. Of the subjective laws of association. 
 
 The laws commonly comprehended under this class are, 
 as I have remarked, interval of time, fiequency of repetition, 
 coexistent emotion, and the mental state of the particular 
 Individ uah 
 
 1. Interval of time. 
 
 Every one knows that if two ideas are associated together 
 from any cause whatever, the one readily recalls the other, 
 if only a short interval of time have elapsed. But, if both 
 of the ideas have been for a long time absent from our 
 recollection, the association becomes indistinct, and the sug- 
 gestion occurs less readily. To the truth of this remark 
 everyone's experience bears testimony. The events of a 
 journey, by the relations of contiguity of time and place, 
 readily suggest each other in regular succession, immedi- 
 ately after our return. But, if we enter upon our usual 
 avocations, and have no occasion, either by writing or con- 
 versation, to recal"! the scenes which we witnessed, all but 
 the most prominent events fade from our recollection. We 
 forget most of the localities, and those which we remem- 
 ber cease to suggest the events connected with them. All 
 becomes blended together in one confused remembrance ; we 
 forget both when and where we saw pirticular persons car 
 
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS. 213 
 
 tiuflgs. and nothing -.rinams to us but a recollecti m of the 
 most iinpoitjint events, and a general impression m:ide b^ 
 the facts, which are themselves fast sinking into oMivion 
 The same truth is illustrated hy the reading of a book, and 
 iu a thousand other instances. 
 
 2. Repel U ion. 
 
 It is obvious that an association which Las been frequently 
 r2called presents itself to us much more i-eadily than anoth 
 er which has only once or t*vice, and at long intervals, passed 
 through the mind. By every successive act of repetition, 
 the connecting link between the two ideas is strengthened, 
 until, at length, the association between the two becomea 
 indissoluble. Hence it is that the beliefs of chddhood are 
 with so great difficulty eradicated, and that, even after the 
 belief has passed away, the association still remains. Thus, 
 many persons who in youth have been taught the belief in 
 goblins, and night after night have hstened to the recital of 
 ghost stories and spectral appearances, although now per- 
 fectly convinced of the groundlessness of their former belief, 
 never pass by a grave-j'^ard, in darkness, without a tremor. 
 They have so firmly associated a grave-yaid with ghosts, 
 that, in spite of the most deliberate conviction, the one idea 
 recalls the other with its former unpleasant emotions. 
 
 The value of this power of rendering associations perma- 
 nent by repetition is seen in the acquisition of practical skill 
 He who has been in the habit of performing the most com- 
 plicated operations never finds himself at a loss ; each step 
 in the process instantly suggesting that which is immediately 
 to succeed it, and each successive emergency calling to mind 
 the means by which it has been previously encountered. 
 Hence, we see the difference between theory and practice, 
 »Tid the peculiar advantages of each. He who is only ac- 
 quainted with the theory is obliged tc |)ursue a course of 
 reasoning in order to arrive at a result; while, to a rracticai 
 
214 I?:iELLEJTUAL PHILOSDPHT. 
 
 man, tL} result is 3uggt«ted bj the principle of reiterated 
 association. A man may have studied thoi oughly the theory 
 of navigation, and may understand the laws by which a vessel 
 is governed in moving through the water, both in fair weathct 
 and foul. But let him be called on to reduce his knowledge 
 to practice in any trying emergency, and he will be obliged 
 to curapaie and reason, and form a judgment from various 
 conflicting elements, so that he will probably not arrive at a 
 result until the time of action is past. He, however, who has 
 been long in the practice of navigation, who has witnessed 
 storms in all their variety, and has frequently been called 
 upon to employ the means necessary to escape their violence, 
 finds that at the critical moment the course proper to be 
 pursued suggests itself spontaneously. He will, therefore, 
 have taken all the measures necessary for safety, before the 
 theoretical navigator has determined what they are. The 
 extent to which practical skill may be carried, without any 
 knowledge of piinciples, is often remarkable. A very intel- 
 ligent Ciiptain of a steamer once told me that he had, for 
 sevLial years, emjiloyed an engineer, in whom he reposed 
 entire confidence, and whom he had found, on every occa- 
 sion, perfectly competent to the discharge of his duties. It 
 happened that on one occasion the engineer made some 
 remaik which led him to ask the question, what makes an 
 engine go. Tlie man rc[)lied, at once, that he never knew, 
 and he never could understand it, although he knew the 
 several parts perfectly, and could, by the sound of the ma- 
 chinery, tell in an instant the nature and place of any ureg- 
 ularity, and the manner in which it should be rectified. 
 
 By ti.tse remarks, however, I do hot wish it to be under- 
 stood that I consider practical skill preferable to thecretical 
 knowledge. Were events always to follow each other in 
 the same succession, and always to recjuire the same mode oi 
 treatment, practice would seem nearly all that was neoes- 
 
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS. 2l5 
 
 sary i.i education. But the reverse is the fuct. Cases ara 
 continua!ly occurring which can only be provided for by a 
 knowledge of general laws ; and here, if we have no guide 
 bur praciieal skill, we must be inevitably disconcerted. 
 When a new emergency arises, nothing but general laws 
 will enable us either to undei-stand or to piovide fcr it. 
 The j»erfection of education requires that both of these elo* 
 ments be combined, — that is, that we learn the laws by 
 which changes are governed, and acquire so thorough a 
 knowledge of the modes of their application, ami, by repeated 
 practice, associate so strongly the steps of the process we 
 perform, that, while we act with the promptitude of the 
 practised artisjin. we may comprehend the reasons of our 
 action, and be able, on the instant, to form a correct judg- 
 ment under the pressure of an untried emergency. Thus 
 the affairs of a government, under ordinary circumstances, 
 may be sufficiently well conducted by a mere official, guided 
 Bolely by precedent, provided he be familiar with the rou- 
 tine of daily administration. But when new combinationa 
 arise, and events transpire, for which official rules furnish 
 no direction, there is demanded, besides a knowledge of the 
 forms of proceeding, a comprehensive acquaintance with 
 geneial prmciples, which shall unfold the true relations of 
 things, under what conditions soever they may present thom- 
 Belves. Thus says Mr. Burke, in his speech y.x\ American 
 taxation: "It may truly be said that men too much con- 
 versant with office are rarely minds of remarkable enlarge- 
 ment Their habits of office are apt to give them a turn to 
 tliink the substance of business not to be mo-e important 
 than the forms in which it is conducted. These foims are 
 adapted to ordinary occasions, and iherefore persons who 
 are nurtured in office do admirably well so long as things 
 go on in their common order; but when the iiigh roads are 
 broken up, and the waters aie out. — when a new and 
 
216 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 troubled scene is opened, and the file affords no precedent 
 — then it is tliat a greater knowledge of mankind, imd a ffii 
 more extensive comprehension of things, is requisite than 
 ever office gave, or than ever office can give." 
 
 I: !.!:« fiequently been observed th.it military commandera 
 h.'iv2 generally succeeded remarkably well in the adminis- 
 tratijn of civil affairs. As examples of this, the founders 
 of dynasties may be referred to ; or, if particular instances 
 need be given, we may mention the names of Frederick the 
 Great. Washington, Napoleon, Wellington, General Jack- 
 son, and a multitude of others. The reason of this may be 
 found in the remark made above, that the perfection of edu- 
 cation consists in the combination of theoretical knowledge 
 with practical skill. The iuties of a military commander 
 give him this education. He is obliged to form for himself 
 the plans which must be carried out upon his own responsi- 
 bility. Hence, he must study them thoroughly for himself, 
 understand their bearings, and take no step which he haa 
 not decided upon after the most mature rellection. He 
 must then execute his decisions himself, and thus the rela- 
 tion of theory and practice, of the conception and the e.Kecu- 
 tion of it, must be cotistantly present to his refl 'Ction. The 
 advantage which this habit of mind must confer, over that 
 of theorists who never practise and practical men who never 
 reason, must be apparent. India has been called the cradle 
 of great men, and for this same reason. In the inmiensc 
 enr.pirc of Great Britain in the East, the government of sc 
 many provinces must cieate a vast number of situations in 
 which alu.ost the sole authority must resile in the chiet 
 idministrative officer of the district. He must learn to 
 dcci k' for himself, and decide wisely, and also provide the 
 means for carrying his decisions into effect. In such 9 
 school as this, talent is rapidly developed, and thus not 
 unfrcquently a man of thirty-five attains the clearness of 
 
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS. 217 
 
 mind, fenility of resources, and promptness of action, of k 
 man. under oi dinar j circumstances, of fifty. 
 
 5. Coexistent emotion is Cie third law of suVjectivo 
 association. 
 
 By the law of coexistent emotion, it is meant th it -when- 
 ever an e-ent awakens in us strong emotion, it becomes 
 deeply fixed in the memory, and is more readily associated 
 with any other event to which it is related. 
 
 Of the existence of such a law in our mental constitution 
 our own experience will furnish us with innumerable exam- 
 ples. The events of several days will frequently pass away, 
 without leaving more than a dim and shadowy trace of their 
 occurrence. But if on any particular day a fact has been 
 communicated to us by which we were strongly excited, as 
 the death of a friend, the unexpected arrival of a relative, 
 or an event of great importance to our country, that day 
 will long stand out vividly before us. The place where and 
 the time when we first received the intelligence are indis- 
 solably associated with the event itself, and the fact, with 
 all its attendant circumstances, is engraven on the mind for- 
 ever. So, in travelling over a country for the first time, ita 
 ordinary features, awakening no emotion, are soon forgotten ; 
 but if we chance to pass by a celebrated river, an overhang- 
 ing precipice, a magnificent waterfall, or any other object 
 that awakens the emotion of novelty, beauty, or sublimity, 
 we find it indelibly fixed in our recollection, with all its at- 
 tendant circumstances ; and it is ever afterwards ready to be 
 associated with similar scenes which we witness ourselves, or 
 which are described to us by others. The power of emotion 
 is here two-fold ; — in the first place, it rivets the event on 
 the memory, and, in the second, it recalls it whenever, on » 
 subsequent occasion, the same emotion is awakened. 
 
 It is on this principle that felicity of style, splendor of 
 imagery and power of description become important aids in 
 19 
 
218 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 all our efforts to convince men bjargumeit When via 
 desire to change the opinions of men, it is Lecessarj that our 
 reasonings be retained in their recollectijn, and frequently 
 dwelt upon in reflection. When an argument is associated 
 •with emotion it is more easily retained; and when the crao 
 tion is pleasant it is more readily recalled, and more 
 earnestly considered. Under these circumstances it will 
 produce a more distinct impression on the judgment, and 
 the judgment itself is associated with agreeable emotions. 
 Every one will remember, after hearing a discourse, that 
 different passages present themselves to his recollection with 
 different degrees of distinctness ; and he always finds that 
 those which affected him most strongly during delivery are 
 those which fix themselves, afterwards, most firmly on his 
 memory. Of the thousands who have read Burke's speech 
 on the nabob of Arcot's debts, probably very few have any 
 distinct conception of the argument, while all remember hia 
 magnificent description of the descent of Hyder Ali upon 
 the Carnatic, commencing, "When, at length Hyder Ali 
 found," etc. The facts and the reasonings may have long 
 i»mce passed away, but we remember the scene of devasta- 
 tion which the orator describes, and, whether justly or 
 unjustly, hold in abhorrence the men whom he stigmatizes 
 >tf the authors of the calamity. 
 
 4. Peculiarities of mental character. Some of these 
 are permanent, and some accidental. 
 
 Men differ very greatly in mental constitution. In scnie 
 the reasoning element predominates, in others the imagin- 
 ative, and in others the practical. These intellectual biase? 
 must modify very materially the train of thought. Let, 
 for instance, a poet and a philosopher, on a clear night, 
 go out to survey the vault of heaven, studded with in- 
 numerable stars. The trains of thought which will arise in 
 the minds of the two men will be exceedingly unlike 
 
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS. 219 
 
 The Oiie would associate all that he saAV with various idea? 
 of moral suhlimitj with which he is familiar, and would per- 
 haps express his emotions in a hymn of praise, or an O'le to a 
 planet. The astronomer would think of the distances, mag- 
 nitudes and revolutions, of the heavenly bodies, and would 
 find himself striving to solve some problem which their pres- 
 ent position suggested. A devout man, on the other hand, 
 would probably give utterance to his emotions in the words 
 of David : " When I consider the heavens the work of thy 
 iingers, the moon and the stars which thou hast ordained, 
 what is man, that thou art mindful of him, or the son of 
 man, that thou visitest him?" To a mind like that of 
 Newton the fall of an apple might give rise to a train of 
 thought which would lead to the most magnificent dis- 
 coveries ; to a boy it might suggest no other idea than the 
 desire of eating it ; while to the botanist it would recall the 
 class and ord-er of plants to which the tree belonged. Agas- 
 Biz and Coleridge would be very differently affected by a view 
 from the vale of Chamouni. On the other hand, in an un- 
 cultivated mind, none of these trains of thought would b« 
 awakened. Thus, the poet, describing a mind of this order, 
 tells us, 
 
 •• A cowslip, by the river's brim, 
 A yellow cowslip was to him ; 
 And it was uothiflg more." 
 
 Besides these intellectual differences, there are j-ermanent 
 varieties of character depending on the tone of mind of the 
 individual. Some men are always cheerful, the present and 
 the future being always tinged with the roseate hue of hope. 
 Every change seems to them indicative of prospeiity. Such 
 is, more commonly, the character of youth. To others the 
 present, but more especially the future, seems clothed with 
 gloom ; and the prospect of change awakens no other emo- 
 tion than apprehensiveness. Such is the character of the 
 
2:^0 nVTELLEClCAL PQIDS-jPHY. 
 
 niL'laiicholj man. and such is apt to be the tendency of age 
 Milton, in his L' Allegro and II Penseroso. has, with strik 
 ing beauty, illustrated these two forms of character. 
 
 These are permanent varieties ; but there are accidental 
 varieties, depending on the circumstances of the individual 
 The mind, deeply affected by any train of reflection, will 
 pursue it for some time, though at variauce with its 
 natural bias. Thus, an astronomer, fresh from the reading 
 of Milton, might look upon the heavens for a time with the 
 emotions of a poet ; and a poet, rising from the study of 
 the Principia, might look upon them with the eye of an as- 
 tronomer. And then, again, our tone of mind frequently 
 varies from its accustomed bias. A cheerful man is some- 
 times sad, and a melancholy man is sometimes mirthful. 
 Images exquisitely ludicrous occasionally flitted across the 
 gloom which habitually shrouded the mind of Cowper. We 
 all know how different are the trains of thought which press 
 upon him who walks abroad for the first time after the 
 death of a friend, and him who. after confinement by sick- 
 ness, rejoices in the freshness of invigorated health. 
 
 These subjective laws again modify each other. Thus, 
 for instance, lapse of time is modified by coexistent emotion ; 
 that is to say. an event which has strongly interested us will 
 much more readily be associated with surrounding circum- 
 stances, even after a long interval, than an event which 
 awakened no emotion, though of more recent occurrence. 
 Or, again, the objective and subjective laws may modify 
 each other. Thus, we know that we associate ideas in 
 obedience to the laws of resemblance or contrast, but whether 
 we shall associate by the one, or the other, may depend 
 upon the permanent or accidental tone of mind of the indi- 
 vidual. Thus, if a cheerful sctrne be presented to a happy 
 man, he associates by resemblance, a melancholy man by 
 jonirast. The loveliness of spring to a mourner suggests 
 
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS. 22) 
 
 jnly imago? of disappointed hope and speedj dissolution 
 To tne cheerful man even the gloom of "vinter a^vakens the 
 anticipations of returning spring, and he thinks only of the 
 contrast which, in a few months, will renew the whole face 
 of nature. 
 
 It is, in this manner, by the combination of these several 
 laws, that the train of thought is directed. As these vari- 
 ous causes operate with unequal power at different times, 
 and are modified bj each other, and by the present circum- 
 stances of each individual, there arises an infinite variety in 
 the modes of mental association. Hence we should consider 
 it almost miraculous if two men should be affected in exactly 
 the same manner in precisely the same circumstances, so that 
 they should give utterance to their sentiments in the same 
 language. Yet, while all this diversity is known to exist, 
 we are conscious that it is still governed by laws ; for we 
 recognize in an instant an abnormal or incoherent associa- 
 tion and attribute it at once either to idiocy or insanity. So 
 delicate are oui' mental instincts, that he who knows nothing 
 of the laws of association is intuitively aware when they 
 are violated. 
 
 It is on the perfection of this delicate instinct, which spon- 
 taneously recognizes all the laws of association, that the 
 power of the dramatist essentially depends. He forms con- 
 ceptions of a variety of characters, and places them in cir- 
 cumstances designed to call forth the intensest emotion. 
 But these circumstances will affect each individual according 
 to his peculiar idiosyncrasy. The dramatic poet has the 
 power of throwing himself into each character, and of feeling 
 instinctively the emotions to which such a human being, 
 under such circumstances, would give utterance. This ia 
 jne of the rarest gifts with which genius is ever endowed. 
 It is to this power that Shakspeare owes his preeminence. 
 Considered simply as a poet, there are other men of geniui 
 19* 
 
222 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 with whom he may come into comparison ; but in dramatic 
 exhibition of character he stands, hj confession, with'^ut a 
 rival. 
 
 • Our Shakspeare's magic could not copied be; 
 ■Within that circle none dare walk but he." 
 
 It may seem, from what I have said, that associatior 
 evinces a power beyond our control, and that hence we arc 
 Dot responsible for our trains of thought, or the conse- 
 quences to which they lead. This inference, it is almost un- 
 necessary to add, is unwarranted. By association ideas are 
 suggested, but it still depends on our own volition to deter- 
 mine whether the suggestion shall be heeded. A thought 
 is presented by the law of association ; we may accept or 
 reject it. Two dissimilar thoughts are suggested, and we 
 may select either of them at our option. When a particu- 
 lar association is followed repeatedly, we form the habit of 
 thinking in that particular train ; but the formation of that 
 habit depended, at each successive step, upon our own will. 
 It is, then, evident that the formation of our characters, 
 whether intellectual or moral, is dependent on ourselves. 
 Hence it is that circumstances are said to form men ; that is. 
 the conditions in which we are placed accustom us to cer- 
 tain modes of thinking, which, becoming habitual, render 
 our character fixed and determinate. Hence, also, we see 
 how much character depends upon energy of will, by which 
 the development of our own powers ceases to be the result 
 of accident, and follows in the line marked out for it by 
 re^-S'">nable and predetermined choice. 
 
 It ha3 been truly remarked, that our associations are fre- 
 qr.'^ntly the cause of great errors in judgment. When wa 
 repoatediy associate two ideas logether, we are prone, with- 
 out examination, to consider the connection by its nature 
 indissoluble. Thus, in youth, having observed many good 
 
KATUBE OF MEMORY. litiS 
 
 mei mrmbors of our own religious sect, we associate th* 
 Her of goodness witli that sect, and, going furtlier, consider 
 piety exclusively confined within its limits. Having, agaia 
 experienced innumerable benefits arising from a republican 
 government, we not only associate the idea of freedom anJ 
 intelligence with our own institutions, but suppose that 
 these advantages can be enjoyed under no other conditicna 
 of humanity . A multitude of cases of a similar kind will 
 readily suggest themselves. These errors are manifestly 
 to be removed by a larger knowledge of the world, and a 
 more careful and frequent examination of the reasons of 
 our opinions. This subject is treated with great beauty 
 and sound discrimination in Stewart's chapter on Associa- 
 tion. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Stewart — Vol. L, chap. 5 ; Locke- -Book 11, chap. 83 ; Reid — Essay 
 4, chap. 4. 
 
 SECTION ir. — THE NATURE OF MEMORY. 
 
 Memory is that faculty by which we retain and recall 
 our knowledge of the past. I saw a tree yesterday. I 
 know now that I saw it then and there. I have a concep- 
 tion of a tree, with a certain knowledge that I saw the tree 
 which corresponds to this conception, at some previous time 
 How I know this I cannot tell, but my consciousness rcveala 
 It to mc as positive and reliable knowledge. 
 
 I have, in the above definition, ascribed but two func- 
 tions to memory, — the power by Avhich we retain, and that 
 by w hich we recall, our knowledge of the past. The distinc- 
 tion between these powers is easily observed, for they are 
 not always bestowed in equal degrees. Some men retain 
 their knowledge more perfectly than they recall it. Othen 
 
224. INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 have their knowledge always at command, and make even 
 small acquisitions eminently available. 
 
 Stewart divides the first of these functions into suscepti- 
 bility and retentiveness. A foundation for this distinction 
 evidently exists. Some men acquire with great rapidity, 
 hut they very soon forget whatever they have learnc-d. 
 Others acquire with difficulty, but retain tenaciously the 
 knowledge which they have once made their own. Others, 
 again, as I have just remarked, have a remarkable command 
 of their knowledge on all occasions. It must be evident 
 that memory is perfect in the degree in which it is endowed 
 with all these attributes. Men of the highest order of in- 
 tellect are often preeminently gifted in all these respects. 
 It will be sufficient to mention the names of Leibnitz, 
 Milton, Johnson, Scott, Napoleon, Cuvier, Goethe, Sir W. 
 Hamilton, in order to confirm the truth of this remark. 
 Such men acquire with incredible flicility, rarely forget any- 
 thing which they have learned, and, at will, with remarkable 
 accuracy, concentrate all their knowledge upon the point 
 which they are at the moment discussing. 
 
 The knowledge which we obtain by memory may prop- 
 erly be called, in the words of Sir W. Hamilton, represen- 
 tative and mediate, in distinction from presentative and 
 immediate knowledge. When I see a tree, I am conscioug 
 of an immediate knowledge, the object being presented 
 directly before my mind. When I remember a tree, there 
 is no external object presented. The tree is represented by 
 the act of the mind itself I know the tree through the 
 medium of this representation. The immediate object of 
 my thouglit is this conce| tion of the thing, while, by a power 
 inher?nt in ray intellect, I connect this image with the idea 
 of past reality. That this is true, is evident from the fact 
 that the mental state is precisely the same, whether the 
 •bject at present is or is not existing. I remember a hou?« 
 
NATURE OF MEMORY. 22i 
 
 Which I saw a year ago. The image of it is distinitlj be- 
 fore my mind. I am told that the house has been burned 
 down, and that nothing remains where it stood but a heap 
 of sra-^ildering ruins. This does not at all affect the image 
 I have in my mind. The only difterence in the two cases 
 is, that before I contemplated it as the representation of 
 scmething existing, now only of something that did exist 
 
 Concerning this faculty, as thus defined, several important 
 (acts may be observed. 
 
 1. I have before remarked, when treating of the percep- 
 tive faculties, that our knowledge derived from this source 
 is of two kinds, simple and complex. Simple knowledge ig 
 merely a state of mind, a consciousness of a peculiar impres- 
 sion made upon our sensitive organism, witliout giving us an 
 intimation of anything external; a mere affection of the 
 ine. without any relation to the not me. The other kind 
 of knowledge is complex ; that is, together with this affection 
 of the me. there is communicated to us a knowledge of the 
 not me, in some of its modifications. In this latter case, 
 we form a notion of the not me as something numerically 
 distinct from the me. 
 
 Whenever our knowledge is of the latter character our 
 recollection of it is always attended by a conception, and 
 this conception forms a part of the act of memory. Sir 
 W. Hamilton, on this account, happily describes memo y a? 
 a recollective imagination. We have before us an image of 
 the object remembered, and are conscious that it represents 
 Bome past existence. Thus, when we remember a visible 
 object, we form for ourselves a distinct conceptioA of its ap- 
 pearance. We never consider an act of memory complete 
 antil this conception is created Thub, if I am asked 
 whether I remember a village .vhich I passed through 
 some years since, if I can ret-^ll the conception of the 
 locality, I answer in the affirmative ; if I only knoM Liaf 
 
226 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY- 
 
 from tin: route which I took I must have passed through itj 
 but have no conception of its appearance, I answer in the 
 negative If. however, after an interval, I am able tc recall 
 it as I perceived it. I reply that now I recollect it. 
 
 With respect to simple knowledge, or that which is 
 limited to sensations, the case is different. We hero form 
 DO conception, and the act of memory is imperfect. I re- 
 member^ for instance, the visible appearance of a peax^h, its 
 color, magnitude, form, etc., and I represent it to myself 
 in thought. I have, however, no .such recollection either of 
 the smell or taste of the peach. I form no ref resentation 
 of these qualities, nor, so far as I know, am I able to do it 
 My recollection amounts to no more than this : I know 
 that I have, at various times, both smelled and tasted of 
 peaches, and that I should instantly recognize these qualities 
 were they present; but I can do no more. An exception 
 to this remark is, however, to be made in the case of hearing. 
 Here, though the knowledge is simple, that is, merely an 
 affection of our sensitive organism, it is, however, capable 
 of forming a conception. Hence, our recollection of it is 
 remarkably perfect. After once hearing a tune, we can, 
 if skilled in music, recall it with perfect accuracy, and can 
 do it in perfect silence, merely forming a conception of the 
 sounds by the memory. 
 
 2. A complete act of the memory is always attended by 
 belief He who remembers, is conscious of an original con- 
 /iction that the conception which he forms is the true repre 
 uentativo of some preexisting knowledge. He knows it to 
 ue, as has been said, a recollective imagination. How wo 
 kiiDw this, how we are able to diatinguish a simple imagina- 
 tion from a recollective imagination, we are unable to ex- 
 plain. Consciousness reveals to us the difference, and wo can 
 diacovei nothing beyond the simple fact. It has been said 
 that we icarn to rely upon the testimony of memory by ex 
 
NATURE OF MEMORI. 227 
 
 perionce. This, h jwever, must be incorrect, for we eviflontl^ 
 rely upon it anterior to experience. And. besides, the very 
 experience on which we are here said to depend, presupposes 
 ihe validity of the testimony of memory. Unless I rely on 
 mem<>ry to give me a knowledge of the past, I can gain no 
 experience respecting the character of memory itself. 
 
 I am, however, aware that there are frequent cases in 
 vhich, while we have a clear conception of an act. our recol- 
 lection is imperfect, so that we doubt whether the state of 
 mind be merely a conception or a recollection. Thus, I 
 intended several days since to write a letter, and formed a 
 purpose to write it at a particular time. The question now 
 occurs to me, did I write it or not? When I think of the 
 act, is my menuil state that of recollection, or only of con- 
 ception ; in other words, did I actually do it, or did I only 
 resolve to do it ? Here our consciousness enables us to 
 distinguish between certainty and doubt, though it does not 
 enable us to resolve the doubt. So far, however, as I have 
 observed, it ^ generally the fact that when we doubt the 
 doubt if entitled to precedence, and we find on inquiry that 
 the thing was not done. When, on the other liand, the 
 testimony of consciousness to our recollection is perfect, we 
 rely u|)on it witii as much ceitainty as on the present evi- 
 dence of our senses. I am as sure that I saw a certain tree 
 yesterday, as I was sure yesterday that I was then seeing 
 it. It is upon this attribute of memory that all our belief 
 of the existence of the past and the distant depends. We 
 r(!po3e the same confidence in the memory of competent 
 \vitnesse3 as in our own. I just as fully and perfectly be- 
 lieve in the existence of Constantinople as of London, thougli 
 the one I have seen and the other I have not seen. Ou 
 this belief in the veracity of memory, all the evidence of 
 testimony depends; and hence, with entire confidence io iti 
 
'2'2S IXTELLECTUAL 1 HILOSOPflT. 
 
 raliditj. we proceed to decide questions involving pro})erty 
 reputation, and life itself. 
 
 It is proper here to remark, that this consciousness, hy 
 which we determine a representation in our minds to be a 
 recollection and not an imagination, is liable to be greatly 
 impaired. He who forms the habit of deliberate lyiug. or 
 of affirming that his conceptions are recollections, will grad- 
 uall v lose the power of distinguishing the one fi-om the other. 
 Bj passing fi-om truth to falsehood and from falsehood to 
 truth, without moral consciousness, the line which separates 
 them from each other becomes more and more indistinct, 
 until it is at last obliterated. I have known men who 
 would utter the most absurd falsehoods, without seeming to 
 be conscious either that thej were ijing or that their hear- 
 ers knew them to be liars. A more just retribution for 
 the abuse of our moral faculties cannot be conceived. 
 
 Another peculiarity connected with this part of our sub- 
 ject deserves to be remarked. "We are sometimes led into 
 innocent mistakes concerning our recollection. If we hear 
 an event frequently related, until every minute incident is 
 engraven on our recollection, we may, after a considerable 
 period has elapsed, seem to ourselves to have witnessed it. 
 I think it is Burke who says, '• Never let a man repeat to 
 you a lie. If he tell you a story every day which you know 
 to be false, at the end of a year you will believe it to be 
 true."' A distinguished justice of the Supreme Judicial 
 Court of Massachusetts once related to me a case which 
 pertinently illustrates this remark. He was once trying a 
 cause relating to a will, and a lady testified most distinctly 
 CO some occuiTences which she had witnessed when she was 
 1 cliild. Her evidence was distinct and minute as to all 
 tlie circumstances of person, time, and place. She was a 
 person of mature age, of a character above suspicion, and 
 incapable of testifying to what she did not believe to li« 
 
NATURE GF MEMORY. 229 
 
 irue. It aowever appeared, in the course vf the trial, froiis 
 incontestable documenuiry evidence, that the events had 
 transpired several yeai-s before she was born. When a girl 
 she had heard the occurrence so frequently related, ^^ith 
 gicat particularity, that in mature years it presented itsdi 
 ic her as a matter of personal knowledge rather than of 
 lt3Collection of the narrative of others. 
 
 Lastly ; the act of memory involves two subordinate be- 
 liefs. First, it presupposes a belief in the past existence of 
 the object recollected ; and, secondly, in the past and present 
 existence of the subject recollecting. From both of these 
 we derive the idea of duration, for were there no duration, 
 there could be no past existence ; that is, the idea of dura- 
 tion logically precedes the idea of memory. From th»^ 
 second of these beliefs we derive the idea of personal 
 identity. The belief that we, who are now existing, cog- 
 nized an object at any previous point in duration, supposes 
 both the cognitions to appertain to the same subject; that is, 
 that the ego in botli these cognitions is one and the same. 
 
 3. The power of recollection in different individuals 
 differs greatly, both in degree and in kind. 
 
 Some men are so remarkably gifted in this respect, that 
 without apparent effort they seem to remember whatever they 
 have read, and every person whom they have even casually 
 seen. Others, though possessing many eminent qualities 
 of intellect, find difficulty in recollecting the persons and 
 things which daily surround them. Cyrus is reported to 
 have been able to call by name every soldier in his army, 
 ar. I Themistocles to have known individually every citizen 
 of Athens. I have been told that General "Washington 
 never found it necessary to be twice introduced to the same 
 person. Boswell records of Dr. Johnson, that once, when 
 lidin^^ in a stage-coach, he repeated with verbal accuracy 
 tt pumbei- of the Rambler, some ten or twelve years iftej 
 20 
 
230 INTELLECTUAL PHILDSOPHY. 
 
 Its publication ; at the same time stating tliat he bad not 
 Been it since he corrected the original proof sheets. In hi-j 
 life of Rowe he criticizes the poets works with a very accu- 
 rate conception of their merits, frequently quoting whole pas- 
 sages as though he were transcribing them from the printed 
 page. When he had finished it, he said to a friend, " 1 
 think this is pretty well done, considering that I have not 
 read a play of Rowe's for thirty years." On the contrary, 
 Montaigne, though a man of original genius, and one of the 
 marked men of his age, was always complaining of the bad- 
 ness of his memory. " I am forced," says he, " to call my 
 servants by the names of their employments, or of the coun- 
 tries where they were born, for I can hardly remember their 
 proper names, and if I should live long, I question whether 
 I should remember my own name." In this case there seemg 
 to be some peculiar idiosyncrasy; for while he forgot so 
 readily the individual, he was able to remember the class to 
 which he belonged. 
 
 Diflferences of memory exist not only in degree, but in 
 kind. 
 
 I have already observed that some men are more remark- 
 able for susceptibility, others for retentiveness, and othera 
 for readiness of memory. Every one who has observed the 
 minds of young persons, must have seen frequent illustra- 
 tions of the truth of this remark. But these difterences do 
 not terminate here. There exist what may not inappropri- 
 ately be termed objective differences of memory ; that is, thia 
 power seems in different individuals to manifest an affinity 
 foi different classes of objects. Some men remember num- 
 bo.TH and dates with remarkable accuracy, and easily retain 
 jiot only figures, but even long and complicatsd algebraic 
 formulae. Other men remember permanently and without 
 eflbrt, localities, the faces of persons, and every form of 
 external natuie. Some have great facility in recollecting 
 
NATURE OF MEMORY. 231 
 
 words and their relations to each other; and heiicc at &n 
 early age manifest a fondness for the study of language and 
 the puisuits of philology. Others again, ^vho are po» 
 sessed of none of these po^Yers in a remarkable degr<^c, 
 acquire principles and general laws without effort, and will 
 frequently remember the law, while they forget the facts by 
 •which it is established. It is said that the late Dr. Gall 
 was first led to the investigations which terminated in his 
 system of phrenology, by observing that some boys possessed 
 peculiar skill in finding their way out of a forest, while 
 others, under the same circumstances, would be completely 
 bewildered. He remarked, that those of the first chiss wen', 
 marked with a protuberance in the forehead just above the 
 eye. He also observed that those who displayed a remark- 
 able aptitude for languages were formed with a depression 
 of the roof of the orbit of the eye, which gave to the eye 
 the appearance of unusual fulness. Generalizing these ob- 
 servations, he was led to conclude that every modification 
 of mental character was accompanied by some corresponding 
 peculiarity in the form of the brain. Whether there be the 
 connection between the mental and physical organization 
 which phrenologists assert. I will not determine ; but that they 
 have aided us in remarking with greater exactness many 
 peculiarities of mental constitution, may, I think, be fairly 
 admitted. 
 
 That these differences may be accounted for, in some 
 degree, by education, I have no doubt. In the most re- 
 markable instances, however, they seem to depend chiefly 
 on natural endowment. I have known several persons who 
 have been gifted with some of these forms of recollection in 
 a very uncommon degree, and they have uniformly told me 
 that the things which they remembered cost them no more 
 pains than those which they forgot. All the account 
 which they coul 1 give of the matter was, that some cla?se« 
 
232 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHl'. 
 
 of facts, without any special eifort, remained permanenllj 
 fixed in their recollection, while others were t\s readily for 
 gotten by them as by other men. A highly-esteemed cler- 
 gyman of Massachusetts, lately deceased, who could tell the 
 year of the graduation of every alumnus of his university 
 and the minutest incidents relating to every ordination ia 
 his vicinity for the last half-century, assured me that it cost 
 him no labor, but that it was. so far as he knew, a mental 
 peculiarity. 
 
 The large development of any particular form of memory 
 is not, of necessity, accompanied by any other remarkable 
 intellectual endowments. Instances have frequently been 
 noticed of men, with prodigious powers of lecollection, 
 whose abilities in other respects were even below medi- 
 ocrity. Very remarkable memory has even been observed 
 in persons of so infirm an understanding that they did 
 not even comprehend what they accurately repeated. In this 
 case, probably, the power was mere susceptibility of memory; 
 that is, the power of acquiring on the instant, without the 
 ability of permanent recollection. A very remarkable case 
 of this one-sided power is mentioned in the life of the late 
 Mr. Roscoe, of Liverpool. A young Welsh fisherman, of 
 about the age of eighteen, was found to have made most re- 
 markable progress in the study of languages. He was not 
 only familiar with Latin and Greek, but also with Hebrew, 
 Arabic, and other oriental dialects. Some benevolent gen- 
 tlemen, in that city, provided means for giving him every 
 literary advantage, in the hope that his vast acquisitiona 
 might be made useful to society, and also that he might un- 
 fol 1 the processes by which his singular attainments had 
 been made. The attempt was. however, unsuccessful. He 
 Beemed not to be peculiarly capable of education, but, witl 
 the exception of ttis peculiar gift, hh mind partook eutireij 
 
5ATURE I. F MEMORY. Zda 
 
 OT the character of the class with A\hich he had boon asao- 
 eiatcd. 
 
 4. The character of memory changes materially with 
 
 age. 
 
 Memory is one of our faculties which is developed at a 
 very early age, specially in the characteristics of suscepti- 
 bility and retentiveness. Of this any one will be convinced 
 who will observe the prodigious number of particulars which 
 a human being acquires almost in infancy. A child of four 
 or five yeai-s old has already learned the names and uses 
 of the ordinary objects which he sees around him ; and hag 
 acquired a tolerable knowledge of his native language. A 
 boy, before he goes to school, is better acquainted with his 
 mother tongue, than he will be with Latin and Greek after 
 ten or twelve years of study. Nor is this all. Cbildren 
 educated in a family in which several languages are spoken, 
 learn them all with equal facility. 
 
 As might, however, be expected, this faculty, which first 
 comes to maturity, is also the first to decline. The first intel- 
 lectual indication of advancing years is a conscious failure in 
 the power of recollection. When the memory becomes im- 
 paired from this cause, we do not forget so much the 
 knowle ige acquired in youth, as that acquired at a later 
 period. Hence, old men recite the deeds of their youth, 
 not those of maturer years. Horace describes an old man 
 as laudator temporis acti. The heroes of our revolution 
 are never so well pleased as when relating the events of that 
 illustrious struggle, and the rem.niscences which they have 
 treasured up of the career of Washington. The reason 
 for this is two -fold. An event which transpires in youth 
 awakens in us a deeper coexistent emotion than in age : and, 
 pecondW, the social character of youth leads us frequenth 
 to relate the incidents which please us, and hence every in 
 tcresting event becomes more deeply engraved on the mem 
 20* 
 
234 INTELLECTUAL PHIL:)S0PHY. 
 
 ory. To an old man, the Idter period of his life resemblej a 
 dream ; the period of youth and early manhood alone seems 
 like realiry. 
 
 As old men are naturally inclined to recite the events of 
 tLeir youth, so this very recital is most pleasing to the 
 young. A child wearies his parents with the request that 
 they will tell him what they saw and did when they were 
 young. We are all conscious of the eagerness with which 
 we li:-ten to the relation, by eye-witnesses, of occurrences 
 which transpired sixty or seventy years since. The final 
 cause of this arrangement is as obvious as it is beautiful 
 These conesponding dispositions were conferred upon us for 
 the sake of binding together the young and the old by the 
 tie of mutual sympathy. The tedium and infirmity of age 
 is beguiled and alleviated by the society of youth ; and the 
 young are taught those lessons of experience, which they 
 would seek for in vain from those who, like themselves, are 
 just commencing the warfare of life. 
 
 From these facts, we learn the more correctly to appre- 
 ciate the importance of a diligent and well-spent youth. If 
 the spring-time of life is consumed in frivolity and sin, the 
 mind, in the winter of age, must sink into decrepitude; and 
 nothing will present itself to the memory, but the recollec- 
 tion of deeds which tinge the cheek with shame, and goad 
 the conscience with remorse. If, on the other hand, the 
 memory is stored in youth with valuable knowledge, and the 
 faculties are disciplined by strenuous exertion, we sow the 
 seeds of a green old age ; that condition in which, without 
 the vigor and elasticity of youth, there exist the accumu- 
 lated knowledge of a laborious life, and the calm, ripe wis- 
 dom of a large experience. If to these be added the con- 
 gcionsness of purity of motive, and the beautiful simjdieit)? 
 which results from a virtuous life, old age becomes one of 
 the mo^t favored periods of our present state. It 3ay then 
 
NATURE OF MEMORY. 2Zt 
 
 be worth while for the young to remember, that ^Yhile dili 
 gence and mental discipline aftbrd the only reasonable hope 
 lor success in manhood, they present the only security 
 against the evils of an imbecile, unhappy, and neglected old 
 
 age- 
 It is to be remarked, further, that the memory of youth 
 differ? in kind, as well as in degree, from that of mature! 
 life. In youth, as might be expected, we remember facts ; 
 as we advance in age, we observe, .appreciate, and remem- 
 ber laivs and their relations. In the early peiiod of life, wo 
 collect the materials ; as we grow older, we learn to use 
 them. In youth our tendency is to the objective and con- 
 crete; in maturer years we tend to the subjective and the 
 abstract. If we were to be more particular, we might 
 affirm, that in childhood susceptibility seems more active ; 
 in youth, retentiveness ; and in manhood readiness. In 
 childhood, as I have said, we learn a multitude of things 
 which we soon forget. The ordinary events of the first 
 fo-ir or five years of our lives soon pass into obliv:on. In 
 w'vancing youth, while we lose in some degree the powei 
 of committing to memory, we retain what we have learned 
 cr.uch more tenaciously. I have remarked on the facility 
 with which young persons will learn several languages at 
 the same time, and, what is scarcely possible for an adult, 
 they will learn them idiomatically.* It is, however, a singu- 
 
 * I singular confirmation of this remark is found in the life of Dr. 
 Z&n^y the pioneer Protestant missionary in India. Dr. Carey had a d<r 
 eidf'l -alent for languages, and accjuired them with gre.at facility before ha 
 lift England. When he arrived in Bengal with his family, he commenced 
 the study of the native tongues with his usual perseverance, assisted by 
 the best helps, both printed and oral, which the country then alRjrded 
 Hia children, without any instruction, were left to nniuse themselves with 
 natives of thjir own age. It Wiis not long before the f ith«'r was obliged ^ 
 to call in his children to explain to him phrases and idioms wliiob he waf 
 unable to unlerstand. They had lesirned, by playing wiih their felJi «rs 
 more rapidly than he by tH combined aid of books and p audits. 
 
236 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 lai fact, that if a young person stulies an ancient language 
 as Latin or Greek, and, from change of residence, forgets hii 
 native tongue, he will remember the language which he ac- 
 quired by grammatical study longer than his vernacular 
 This difference may arise either from the fact that reten- 
 tiveness of memory increases with age, or because whatever 
 is learned by a protracted effort is more indelibly fixed in 
 the recollection. 
 
 5. Memory may be improved in a shorter time, and t« a 
 greater extent, than any of our other faculties. 
 
 The change that may be produced in this respect is i i- 
 quently remarkable. Pupils in a school may, in a 1 jw 
 months, be taught to commit to memory an amount which, at 
 first, would have seemed incredible. It is not difiicult to 
 teach a class to recite from beginning to end the acquisitions 
 of a whole term, w ithout any aid from the instructor. A 
 gentleman with whom I am well acquainted, informed me 
 that he once determined to ascertain the extent to whic a the 
 improvement of his memory could be carried. H( soon 
 found himself able to repeat verbatim, two or three p? ^es of 
 any book after it had been read to him only once. ] le was 
 able to go into a legislative assembly, and write dowi from 
 recollection, after its adjournment, the proceedings of the 
 day, with as much accuracy as they were reportea by the 
 stenographers. 
 
 While, however, it is generally true, that the mea,ory may 
 be greatly and permanently improved by judiciou? practice, 
 *t is probable that the rapid improvement, of whicU we have 
 frequent instances, has respect more tc susceptibility, than 
 tither to retentiveness or readiness. What we acquire so 
 suddenly is learned only for a particular occasion ; «nd 
 when the occasion has passed away, all we have learned lias 
 passed away with it. Clergymen, who with case commit 
 their sermons by once or twice reading them over, are obliged 
 
NAirRE OF MEMORY. 231 
 
 lo commit ttem anew as ofton as tbey are called to deliver 
 tliem. WLen we desire to cultivate the memory in general, 
 and render our knowledge permanently available, greater 
 care is necessary. The process is more difficult, and musi 
 be conducted on principles which depend on the general laws 
 of the human mind. 
 
 The following case, related by Dr. Abercrombie, illus- 
 trates the extent to which the susceptibility of memory may 
 be increased by the pressure of circumstances. " A distin- 
 guished theatrical performer, in consequence of the sudden 
 illness of another actor, had occasion to prepare himself, on 
 very short notice, for a part which was entirely new to him ; 
 and the part was long, and rather difficult. He acquired it 
 in a very short time, and went through it with perfect accu- 
 racy, but, immediately after the performance, forgot every 
 word of it. Characters which he has acquired in a more 
 deliberate manner he never forgets, and can perform them 
 at any time without a moment's preparation ; but, in regard 
 to the character now mentioned, there was the further and 
 very singular fact, that, though he has repeatedly performed 
 it since that time, he has been obliged each time to prepare 
 it anew, and has never acquired in regard to it that facility 
 which is familiar to him in other insttinces. When ques- 
 tioned respecting the mental process which he employed the 
 first time he performed this part, he says that he lost sight 
 entirely of the audience, and seemed to have nothing before 
 him but the pages of the book from which he had learned 
 it ; and that, if anything had occurred to interrupt this illu- 
 Bi;n, he should have stopped instantly." — Abercrombie, 
 Part 3, section 1. 
 
 b. The power of recollection depends much .n the man- 
 ner in which our knowledge has been acquired. 
 
 Knowledge acquired by the assistance of our perceptive 
 Swjulties, is much longer remembered than that acquired b^ 
 
238 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY- 
 
 ronception through the medium of language. An i. further, 
 B proposition which can in any manner be represented by an 
 imagii is more easily remembered than a purely abstract 
 proposition, of which no image can be formed. We remem- 
 ber a landscape far better by having seen it, than by tho 
 most elaborate description. Every one knows that the 
 sceneiy depicted in the writings of travellers and novelists 
 leaves scarcely a trace on the recollection. A machine may 
 bo desciibed to us with the most careful particularity, and 
 we may be able distinctly to comprehend it ; yet, if we see 
 neither it nor a model of it, we soon find that our recollec- 
 tion has become exceedingly shadow^'' and vague. The use 
 wliich may be made of this fact is evident. It teaches U8 
 the importance of illustrating, by figures, diagrams, or ex- 
 periments, whatever we desire to communicate to others, 
 wherever the subject admits of it. Hence the use of a 
 black-board in a class-room ; and hence the value of skill 
 in drawing, to an instructor, in every branch of physical 
 science. 
 
 7. It is, however, the fact, that, in our present state, time 
 gradually obliterates the impressions made upon the memory. 
 What we learned yesterday, may be fresh in our recollection 
 to-day, but we shall remember it much less perfectly in a 
 month. If a year elapse without having had occasion to 
 recall it, it will in a great degree have faded away from our 
 recollection. I say, in a great degree; for, although the 
 principle which it involves, or the conclusion which it estab- 
 lishes, may remain, the sharp and definite outline of the 
 facts will have dissolved into forgetful ness. In this respect, 
 wo are all the victims of a perpetually recurring delusion. 
 It seems to us that what Ave remember so perfectly, and 
 understand so clearly, to-day, can never be forgotten. 
 Thvugh repeated trials, and lamentable ignorance of vrhal 
 «ve have once known, might seem sufficient to convince ua of 
 
NATURE OF MEMOR"i. SJ8j^ 
 
 OUT error, we press blindly onward, ever learning, and yet 
 ever fliiling peiinanently to treasure \ip what we have 
 already acquired. 
 
 VVliile til is, however, is the general fact, it is suhjeci to 
 several modifications. Some of these are the following : 
 
 1. Exact and definite knowledge is much longer remeni- 
 Itered than vague and indeiinite conceptions. A proposition 
 tut half known, and indistinctly conceived, is almost imme- 
 diately forgotten ; while that which we have thoroughly 
 thought, and adequately comprehended, does not easily 
 escape us. Hence we see that our progress in knowledge 
 does not 80 much depend upon the amount which we read 
 as upon the manner in which we study. lie avIio reviews 
 his past history will observe that his present acquisitions are 
 the sum of all that he has at some time thoroughly learned. 
 That which was only imperfectly understood is lost in the 
 mass of confused and useless reminiscences. 
 
 2. An isolated proposition is soon forgotten, Avliile one 
 of which we perceive the connections and relations is more 
 easily remembered. A single number, as the height of a 
 mountain, the area of a field, the page of a book, a law of 
 mechanics expressed in abstract terms, or any truth viewed 
 without relation to any other truth, easily eludes our recol- 
 lection. We obviate this diflBculty, if we can establish any 
 relation, even though it be but fanciful, between the fact 
 which we desire to remember, and some other truth perma- 
 nently known. Thus, if we wish to remember the height 
 of a mountain, we associate it with the height of some well- 
 Vnown object, and we find our power of recollectiou 
 jnoreased. If we associate a law with the facts for which 
 it accounts, tlie same effect is produced. It is on the prin- 
 ciple of associating something to be remembered, \>ith some- 
 thing else well known, that the systems of artific.iJ uaenicrjf 
 wre construc'ied. 
 
j 240 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 3. Knowledge "wbich is beginning to vanish from oui 
 recollection is rendered more permanent by even a cursory 
 i|j review. By occasionally repeating this review, the truth 
 
 Dccomes incorporated with our permanent knowledge. It is 
 a good rule never to commence the reading of to-day, until 
 we have carefully reviewed the reading of yesterday, and 
 never to lay aside a book until we have leisurely impnnted 
 on oar minds its most important truths. Conversation on 
 what we have read is of great service in this respect. I 
 think it is Johnson who mentions that it was his custom, in 
 youth, as soon as he had finished a book, to find some one 
 to whom he could explain its principles. Full and free 
 discussion upon the truths which we have acquired, gives not 
 only permanency but definiteness to our knowledge. It i? 
 on this account that studious men derive so much advantage 
 from associating together, and communicating the result of 
 their researches for the benefit of each other. 
 
 8. From remarkable and well-authenticated facts, it ap- 
 pears that, probably from some unexplained condition of the 
 m-aterial organs, the recollection of knowledge long since 
 obliterated may be suddenly revived. These cases have been 
 observj^d to occur most frequently in extreme sickness, and 
 on the near approach of death. May it not be that, in our 
 present state, the material and immaterial part of man being 
 intimately unued, our failuie of recollection is caused by 
 some condition of the material organism ; and that, as this 
 union approaches dissolution, the power of the material over 
 the immaterial is weakened, and the knowledge which we 
 have once acquired is more fully rpvealed to our conscious- 
 ness, indicating that when the separation is complete it will 
 remain with us forever ? 
 
 A variety of cases are mentioned by writers on this sub- 
 ject, a few of which are here inserted : 
 
 An instance is mentioned by Coleridge of a servant-gir 
 
NATTJRE OF MEMORI 241 
 
 in Germany, who, in extreme sickness ivas obiei ve<l to 
 re{>eat passages of Greek, Latin and Hebrew, tliougb she 
 was known to have no acquaintance with these languages. 
 Upon inquiry into her history, it was found that, many yeara 
 before, she had been a domestic in the family of a learned 
 professor, who was in the habit of repeating aloud passages 
 from his favorite authors while walking in his study, which 
 adjoined the apartment in which she was accustomed to labor. 
 This case is the more remarkable, inasmuch as the person 
 bad never been conscious herself of having acquired the 
 knowledge which she, under these circumstances, exhibited. 
 
 The Rev. Mr. Flint, a very intelligent gentleman, who, in 
 ft series of interesting letters, has related his experiences in 
 the valley of the Mississippi, informs us that, under a des- 
 perate attack of typhus fever, as his attendants afterwards 
 told him, he repeated whole pages from Virgil and Homer, 
 which he had never committed to memory, and of which, 
 after his recovery, he could not recollect a line. 
 
 Dr. Aborcrombie, in his work on intellectual philosophy, 
 mentions a variety of cases in which persons in extreme sick- 
 ness, and under operations for injuries of the head, con- 
 versed in languages which they had known in youth, but had 
 for many years entirely forgotten. 
 
 Dr. Rush mentions the case of an Italian gentleman, who 
 died of j^ellow fever in New York, who, in the beginning of 
 his sickness, spoke English ; in the middle of it, French ; 
 but on the day of his death, nothing but Italian. A Lu- 
 theran clergyman informed Dr. Rush that the Germans and 
 Swedes of his congregation in Philadelphia, when near 
 death, always prayed in their native languages, though soma 
 of them, he was confident, had not spoken them for fifty or 
 sixty years. 
 
 Dr. Abercrombie mentions another case, of a bry, who, at 
 the age of four, received a fracture of the skull, for which 
 21 
 
842 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 he unvlerwent the operation of the trepan. He was at the 
 time in a state of perfect stupor ; and, aftar his recovery, 
 retained no recollection either of the accident or of the opera- 
 tion. At the age of fifteen, during the delirium of a fever, 
 he gave his mother a correct description of the operation, 
 and the persons who were present at it, with their dress and 
 other minute particulars. lie had never been observed to 
 allude to it before, and no means were known by which he 
 could have acquired a knowledge of the circumsumces which 
 he related. 
 
 What conclusion we are authorized to draw from theso 
 facts, it is difficult to determine. They, however, indicate 
 that what we seem to forget, can never be irretrievably lost 
 to the percipient soul. The means for recalling it in some 
 inexplicable manner appear to exist, and when, under some 
 unknown conditions, they are called into action, all or any 
 part of our knowledge may, on the instant, be brought to 
 our recollection. 
 
 The moral lesson which these facts inculcate is obvious. 
 £f every impression made upon the mind is to remain 
 upon it forever, if the sou\ be a tablet from which nothing 
 that is written is ever erased, how great is the importance 
 of imbuing it with that knowledge which shall be a source 
 of joy to us as long as we exist ! And, again ; since knowl- 
 edge which lies so long dormant may be revived unex- 
 pectedly, under conditions which we cannot foresee, and at 
 times when it may have the most important bearing upon 
 our decisions and our destiny, it is of the greatest conse- 
 quence to us to store the mind with such knowledge as shall 
 invigorate our principles and confirm our virtue. He who 
 reads a corrupting book for pastime may thoughtlessly lay 
 it down, and suppose that in a few days all the images which 
 it has created will have passed from his remembrance for- 
 ever. But these latent ideas may be recalled by some caauaJ 
 
MATURE OP MEMORY. 243 
 
 RBSOciation or some physical condition of the brain, and give 
 that bits to his mind, in the hour of temptation, which will 
 determine him to a course that shall tend to his final 
 undoing. 
 
 It may not be inappropriate here to suggest the harmony 
 between this condition of memory and the scripture doctrine 
 of a general judgment. The teaching of the New Testa- 
 ment on this subject is, that the whole race of man will be 
 summoned before God, to be judged according to the deeda 
 done in the body. We can easily perceive how all this may 
 be done, if the view which we have taken on this subject be 
 correct. Suppose every being to be perfectly conscious of 
 all the events of his past life, and of all the obligations 
 which he has violated, and his character in a spiritual world 
 to be as manifest to others as it is to himself; and the judg- 
 ment concerning every individual must be immediately 
 formed by the whole universe. No examination is needevi, 
 for the facts which in each case form the basis of the con- 
 demnation are apparent to all. Like choosing its like, tho 
 good would be separated from the bad ; and the decision pro- 
 nounced by the Judge would be reechoed back from the 
 conscience of every individual, with the assent of every 
 moral intelligence. 
 
 It may be well, in closing this section, to refer to some 
 singular effects produced on memory by disease. They 
 do not come under any law with which I am acquainted, 
 yet they deserve to be recoided for the purpose of directing 
 attention to the subject. It is by the observation of anom- 
 alous cases in science, that we are led to the discovery of 
 new and important laws. 
 
 Somt!times, in consequence pf injury or disease, the mem- 
 ory of a particular period is lost altogether, while what 
 uccurred both before and after that period is remembered 
 with accuracy Dr. Beattie mentions the case of a clergy* 
 
244 rKTELLECTFAl PHILOSOrHT. 
 
 man who, in consequence of an apoplectic attack, los. the 
 recollection of precisely four years. 
 
 Sometimes the loss of memory relates to particular per- 
 flODS. Dr. Abercrombie mentions the case of a surgeon ^Yho 
 was thrown from his horse and carried into a neighboring 
 house in a state of insensibility. From this he soon recov- 
 ered, and gave minute and correct directions respecting his 
 '>wn treatment. In the evening he was so much relieved, 
 that he was removed to his own house. The medical friend 
 who accompanied him in the carriage made some observa- 
 tion respecting the precautious necessary to be observed to 
 prevent unnecessary alarm to his family, when, to his as- 
 tonishment, he discovered that his friend had lost all idea 
 of having either a wife or children. It was not until the 
 third day that the circumstances of his past life began to 
 recur to his mind. 
 
 Oases have occurred in which, from an injury to tlie head, 
 the knowledge of a particular language has been lost. In 
 other cases, not a language but a particular class of words 
 has been dropped from the recollection. A case is men- 
 tioned, in which a patient suflfered from an attack of apo- 
 plexy. On his recovery, he had lost the power of pronounc- 
 ing or writing either proper names or any substantive. 
 while his memory supplied adjectives in profusion. He 
 would speak of any one whom he wished to designate, by 
 calling him after the shape or color for which he was dis- 
 tinguished ; calling one man "red," from the color of hig 
 hair, and another "tall," from his stature; asking for hig 
 bat -as " black," and his coat as " brown." As he was a 
 gcod botanist, he was acquainted with a vast number of 
 plants, but he could never call them by their names. A 
 similar instance occurred, lately, in Livingstori county. Now 
 York. 
 
 A remarkable case is mentionexi in the life of Rev. Wu 
 
NATURE OF MEMORY. 245 
 
 Tennent, a distinguished clergyman of New Jersey, about 
 the middle of the last ccnturv. While prosecuting his 
 .studies preparatory to the mmistry, he was taken ill and 
 apparently died. After lying for some days without man- 
 ifesting any signs of life, he was resuscitated and recov- 
 ered. When he regained his health, it was found that he 
 had lost all knowledge of the past, and was obliged to com- 
 mence his studies anew, beginning at the alphabet. lie had 
 proceeded in this manner for some time, and had advanced 
 as far as the Latin grammar, when, on a sudden, he placed 
 his hand on his head, complaining of violent pain, and, on 
 the instant, his fonner knowledge had returned to him just 
 as it existed previous to his illness. The whole account is 
 very remarkable, but I believe its authenticity to be above 
 suspicion. 
 
 Of these, and a vast number of similar facts, I believe oui 
 present knowledge is unable to furnish us with any expla- 
 nation. They deserve to be recorded as material for future 
 investigation. Subsequent inquirers may be enabled to use 
 them so as to point out more clearly the connection between 
 the mind and the material organism, and thus enlarge our 
 knowledge of our intellectual faculties and the conditions of 
 their exercise. 
 
 REFERENCES, 
 
 Nature of memory — Reid, Essay 3, chap. 1; Stewart, vol. i., chap. 6. 
 
 Implies the power of retaining and recalling — Stewart, vol. i., chap 6, 
 lec. 1. Lncke, Book 2, chap. 10, sec. 1, 2, 8 ; chap. 19, sec. 1. 
 
 Includes susceptibility, retentiveness and readiness — Stewart, toI. i., 
 chap. 6, sec. 2. 
 
 An original faculty — Reid, Ess.iy 3, chap. 2. 
 
 Involves conception— Reid, Essay 3, chap. 1; Stewart, vol i., chap. €, 
 Bec.l. 
 
 Attended with belief of past existence and personal identity — B«id. 
 Essay 3, chaps. 1, 4, 6. 
 
 Varies in ditfereut individuals — Abercrjmbie, Part 3, sec. i .. Stewart 
 »ol u, chap. 6, sec. 1. 2. 
 
 21* 
 
246 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Local and philo'«phical memory — Abercrombie, Part 3, see. 1. 
 Greatly improvable — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 6. 
 
 Objects which awaken emotion easily remembered — Stewart, Tol ) 
 thap. 6, sec. 1 
 
 Ideiis fade from memory — Lccke, Book 2, chap. 10, sees. 4, 6. 
 
 Reviewing fixes knowledge — Abercrombie, Part 4. 
 
 Effect of diicase on memory — Abercrombie, Part 3, sec. 1. 
 
 SECTION III. — THE IMPORTANCE OF MEMORY. 
 
 In treating of this subject, I shall consider, first, tlie re« 
 lation of memory to our other faculties ; and, secondly, tb« 
 importance of a cultivated memory to professional success. 
 
 I. The relation between Tnemory and our other intel- 
 lectual faculties. 
 
 Memory is not necessary either to perception or con- 
 sciousness. We could see, and hear, and feel, and be con- 
 scious of all the operations of our faculties, as well without 
 memory as with it. It is not necessary to some acts of orig- 
 inal suggestion. Without it we might have a notion of 
 existence, both objective and subjective. We could not, 
 however, without it, form those original suggestions which 
 involve the idea of succession. Thus, without it, we could 
 have no notion either of duration or of cause and effect. 
 
 Memory, on the other hand, is essential to the existence 
 of all those ideas into which the element of time enters. 
 Without it our whole knowledge would consist of the im- 
 pressions made upon us now and here. Our intellectual 
 existence would thus be reduced to a single point. Whatever 
 we had known previously to the present moment, whatever 
 ideas had occupied our minds before the one which novr 
 occupies them, would be blotted out forever. Hence, though 
 we could form a notion of that which was immediately be- 
 fore us, we could not retain thct notion, or anything corre 
 
IMrORTAXCE OF MEMORY. 247 
 
 iponding to it, after it was withdrawn. Being unable tc 
 tbrm conceptions, wc could perform no acts either of analv- 
 Bis, generalization, or combination. We could form no 
 notion of classes, and could have no general ideas. We 
 could exercise no power of association, for there would be 
 nothing within the scope of our mental vision, except the 
 single idea with which we were at the moment occupie 1. 
 Equally impossible would it be for us to reason. We reason 
 by the comparison of propositions : but every proposition in- 
 volves two ideas, and one of these must designate a class; 
 and without memory, as I have remarked, the notion of 
 classes would be impossible. But if this be true of the sin- 
 gle propositions which form a syllogism, ho«- much stronger 
 is the case when we consider the syllogism itself, and, still 
 more, the sei ies of syllogisms which form an argument. 
 
 Thus, memory holds an intermediate place between those 
 mental acts into which time does and those into which it doea 
 not enter. It originates nothing : it gives us no new ideas ; 
 it merely retains the ideas given us by the originating fac- 
 ulties, and presents them to those other fliculties whose 
 office it is, by modifj'ing. comparing, and combining, to 
 enlarge our knowleilge, and extend indefinitely the range 
 of human intelligence. Thus, though memory originates 
 nothing, yet, without it, the faculties which originate would 
 be useless. Though it neither analyzes nor compares, yet, 
 without it, the powers by which we analyze and compare 
 might as well not exist. Were we possessed of this alone, 
 our existence would be an absolute blank ; yet, possessed 
 of every other but tin's, our existence would be reduced to 
 a single point. If this be the relation which memory sus- 
 tains to our other faculties, it must evidently be one of the 
 aiost invaluable of our intellectual endowments. The greater 
 ihe perfection in which it exists, the broader foundation ii 
 'iiid f >r the exercise of our powers of analysis, combination 
 
248 IXTELLECTU^L PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 and reasoning The more accurately we retain and the 
 more promptly we recall our knowledge of the past, the 
 richer is our supply of material for every form of intellectual 
 exercise. 
 
 II. The importance of a cultivated memory to p? o- 
 fessional success. 
 
 By a cultivated memory, I mean a memory so improved 
 by education that it can treasure up with ease, retain with 
 firmness, and recall with promptitude, the knowledge ac- 
 quired by the other faculties. 
 
 1. Without such a memory it is evident that reading 
 must be, to a great degree, useless. Without it, a man may 
 be what Horace calls a "Ae/Z/zo Ubroriim,'^ a devourer of 
 books ; but he will rarely be anything more. We some- 
 times meet with men of this class, omnivorous readers, who 
 Beize upon books with avidity, with no other object than, 
 either present enjoyment, or the reputation of vast general 
 knowledge. They are pleased with the images spread be- 
 fore them. These pass away to be succeeded by otherSj 
 until the labor is completed, and nothing remains bu<i a 
 confused recollection of pleasant or painful emotions, and 
 the consciousness that another unit has been added to the 
 number of books which they have read. It is evident that 
 a man may read, in this manner, forever, without any in- 
 crease of mental energy, or any real addition to the amount 
 of his knowledge. 
 
 2. A cultivated memory is also indispensable to a vigor- 
 ous imagination. Imagination is the power of forming com- 
 plex concef.tions out of materials already existing in the 
 mind. But it is evidently impossible to combine into im- 
 ages elements which we have never collected, or which, if we 
 have previously collected, we are unable to recall. Hence 
 we find that those authors who have been remarked foi 
 boundless fei tility of imagination have always been endowed 
 
IMPORTANCE OF MEMORY. 24S 
 
 with the high'.st gifts of memory. Scott, Goethe, Coleridge, 
 Milton, Macauley, might be easily referred to as illustrations. 
 A distinguislied poet must be an intense and accurate ob- 
 server of nature, and the conceptions formed from actual 
 observation must be the materials from which he creates 
 the images of btauty or sublimity which please or subdua 
 US. The case is similar in philosophical imagination. Un- 
 less we are possessed of all the facts in a phenomenon or a 
 series of phenomena, we can never form any adequate con- 
 ception of the rationale which binds them together hi one 
 scientific idea. Without an accurate knowledge of the facta 
 in astronomy, Copernicus could never have formed his idea 
 of the solar system. 
 
 3. The importance of a cultivated memory to reasoning 
 is equally obvious. Reasoning is a series of mental acts by 
 which we pass from the known to the unknown. Whenever 
 a proposition is capable of being proved, there exist certain 
 other propositions, which connect it indissolubly with truths 
 already known. These intermediate propositions are called 
 the argument or proof. Suppose, now, that we desire to 
 demonstrate a particular proposition ; if we can summon at 
 will all that we have ever known on the subject, we can 
 easily determine whether we possess the required media 
 of proof If, on the other hand, our knowledge is vague 
 and undetermined, and we are unable to recall it to our 
 recollection, we weary ourselves and perplex others by mul- 
 tiplying irrelevant truths by which nothing is determined. 
 The value of this power is specially illustrated in the case of 
 "orensic or legislative orators. They are frequently obliged to 
 construct an argument, or reply to an opponent, when there 
 t6 neither opportunity for consulting authorities nor e.xamin- 
 ing digests. All that can possibly avail a man is the knowl- 
 edge which he has previously acquired, and hemustbeabU 
 to bring it to bear it once on the point at issue, or the ap 
 
250 fNTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 portunitj is lost forever. On tbis power must, therefore, 
 frequently depend the skill of a debater, or the success of 
 an advocate. 
 
 4. A cultivated memory is necessary to the attainment 
 of accuracy of practical judgment. 
 
 By practical judgment I mean an ability to predict tha 
 future from a knowledge of the past, and to form an opinion 
 of the doubtful from a knowledge of the true. This talent, 
 more than almost any other, gives us influence among men ; 
 and sometimes seems, in the most favored individuals, to at- 
 tain almost to the certainty of prescience. Burke, in hia 
 writings on the French Revolution, predicted the course ^f 
 events almost precisely as they subsequently occurred. 
 Other skilful statesmen have been able, from the present 
 aspect of aflliirs, to anticipate the changes which were ap- 
 proaching in the distance. Several of Napoleon's predic- 
 tions of the course of '-vents in Europe, have been, in a re- 
 markable manner, verified by the political revolutions that 
 have occurred since his death. 
 
 The dependence of this talent upon memory is easily per- 
 ceived. As our judgments respecting the future must pro- 
 ceed upon the supposition that the course of nature is uni- 
 form, how can we predict the future without a knowledge 
 of the past ] But mere general and indefinite knowledg/^ 
 will not here suffice. He who would attain to soundness of 
 judgment must possess himself of facts in particular, with 
 the circumstances by which thej? were surrounded, the limi- 
 tations by which they were fixed, and the conditions under 
 which they existed. This, of course, supposes an accurate 
 aiil ccmprchensive memory. We shall find that the most 
 emmeiitly sagacious men have been favored with a memory 
 of this character. Of this type of mind Dr. Frankliu 
 leems to preseat a remarkable instance. 
 
 But this, of itself, wilJ not confer that eminorce of prao 
 
IMPORTANCB OF MEMORY. 261 
 
 lical judgment to which we here refer. We frequently 
 observe men capable of amassing a vast collecticn of facta. 
 but they arc all thrown together at random, and ever remain 
 in a state of chaotic confusion. Their knowledge has neither 
 been associated by scientific relations, nor classified accord- 
 ing to established principles ; hence it is useless for the fur- 
 pojjcs of investigation, and can form the basis of no prac- 
 tical judgment. It consists of merely isolated facts, from 
 which no general principles have been deduced, and hence it 
 furnishes no rules f )r future conduct. Such a man, though 
 ever so extensively read, will ever be incapable of the wise 
 conduct of affairs. Men are frequently pointed out as walk- 
 ing libraries, to whom every one applies for the knowledge 
 of a fact, but to whose opinion no one would defer in any 
 case of practical importance. Thus, we see that those 
 powers by which knowledge is rendered available must be 
 cultivated, as well as those by which it is acquired, if wo 
 would attain to soundness of judgment in the practical af- 
 fiiiis of life. 
 
 I am, however, aware tiat, to those, other elements must 
 be added, in order to form the character of which we are 
 treatii.g. To a cultivated understanding, a retentive and 
 ready memory, must be united great freedom from preju- 
 dices, i)' vincible love of truth, decided moral courage, and 
 firm reliance on the decisions of the human intellect, if we 
 would realize that conception of practical wisdom which 
 Locke somewhere happily denominates "large round-about 
 common sense." Without freedom from prejudice we shall 
 look upon the plainest facts ihrough a distorted medium. 
 If we have no real love of truth we shall never take the 
 pjiins necessary to arrive at it. If we are deficient in reli- 
 ance on the decisions of our own intellect, no matter hovr 
 clearly we may comprehend our position, we shall nevei 
 reach a deliberate conclusion. And without moral courage^ 
 
252 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPUT. 
 
 whatever be c\ir conclusions, we shall never daie to carry 
 them into practice. In this, as in every other case, we j.er- 
 ceive that moral qualities form the most important elementa 
 of human character. Hence we see that actual ability 
 depends greatly upon the cultivation of our own nature 
 and is placed more within our own reach than might at first 
 be supposed. 
 
 The distinction between mere learning and that practicaJ 
 wisdom by which all learning is made available to the pur- 
 poses of science, or the exigences of practical life, is well 
 illustrated by Cowper in his Task, one of the most deli^jhtfu] 
 poems in the English language. 
 
 " Knowledge and Wisdom, far from being one, 
 Have ofttimes no connection. Knowledge dwells 
 In heada replete with thoughts of other men ; 
 Wisdom, in minds attentive to their own. 
 Knowledge, a rude unprofitable mass. 
 The mere material with which Wisdom builds, 
 Till smoothed, and squared, and fitted to its place. 
 Does but encumber what it seemed to enrich. 
 Knowledge is proud that he has learned so much. 
 Wisdom is humble that he knows no more. 
 Books are, not seldom, talismans and spells. 
 By which the magic art of shrewder wits 
 Holds an unthinking multitude enthralled. 
 Some to the fascination of a name 
 Surrender judgment hood-winked. Some the style 
 Inf ituates, and, through labyrinths and wilda 
 Of error, leads them by a tune entranced. 
 While sloth seduces more, too weak to bear 
 The unsupportable fatigue of thought, 
 And swallowing, therefore, without pause or choice. 
 The total grist unsifted, husks and all." 
 
 W INTER Walk at Noob. 
 
 If these rem-^iks be true, it seems remarkable that th« 
 question should ever have arisen, whether a powerful 
 
IMPORTANCE 3F MEMORY. Si5B 
 
 memory 13 compatible with great soundness of ju<^graent 
 We see, from tlie above considerations, that soumlness of 
 judgment, without a fiiir development of memory, is impos- 
 sible. The mistake on this subject has probably arisen 
 from two misconceptions. In the first place, a cultivated 
 aiid disciplined memory has been confounded with a miscel- 
 laneous and unclassified collection of facts. In the second 
 place, the abuse of memory has been confounded with the 
 use of it. Memory is properly used when it is employed 
 to recall our previous knowledge, in order to deduce from it 
 laws which shall govern our future conduct. It is abused 
 when we employ it merely for the purpose of recalling 
 precedents which shall enable us blindly to follow our file- 
 leader. Here it usurps the place of judgment, and renders 
 us servile copyists and imbecile imitators. When we use it 
 to furnish facts, which, by comparison and generalization, 
 shall enable us to form judgments, we derive from it the 
 benefit which the Creator intended. 
 
 That remarkable powers of memory are commonly asso- 
 ciated with other distinguished endowments, might be easilj 
 shown by instances. I have already alluded to several men 
 of genius, who possessed unusual retentiveness and readinesa 
 of memory. I do not, however, remember any individual 
 in whom this cosibination was so remarkable as the late 
 Emperor Xapoleon. He used to say of himself, that hia 
 knov.ledge was all laid away in drawers, and that he had 
 only to open the proper drawer, and all that he had 
 aci:iuired on that particular subject was at once presented 
 before him. It was, I think, at the Congress of Erfurt, 
 that he astonished the sovereigns of Europe by the minute- 
 Dess of his knowledge of historic dates. When they ex- 
 jressed their surprise that he should have been able to attain 
 Buch extraordinary accuracy amidst the pressure of business 
 Kith which he had been so long overwhelmed, he replied. 
 22 
 
■HI 
 
 254 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 that \m ucquisitic»n3 of this kind were made when he was a 
 lieutenaut of artillery, and was for a considerable period 
 quartered in the house of a bookseller ; besides, added he, ] 
 had always great facility in the recollection of numbers. 
 The diligent improvement of time, in youth, thus kid the 
 inundation for the success of the future arbiter of Euroj>e. 
 
 I have pursued this subject to a greater extent than 
 iiiight have seemed necessary, did I not suppose that the im- 
 portance of this faculty is frequently underrated, especially 
 by young men. If a man succeed in almost any depart- 
 n.ent of intellectual labor, it is often said, by way of dispar- 
 agement, that his effort is nothing but the result of unusual 
 memory. Were this the fact, it would still be true, that tiie 
 cultivation of memory to high perfection, so that our past 
 knowledge is always available in every emergency, is neither 
 an ordinary nor a contemptible attainment. But the asser- 
 tion is commonly unfounded. While distinguished success, 
 in any department, can rarely be attained by the exercise of 
 memory alone, it is equally true that the noblest poNters 
 would be continually liable to mortifying failure Avithout it. 
 Let us, then, labor to cultivate this faculty by every means 
 in our powoi', always remembering that we shall derive from 
 i; the greatest advantage, not by allowing it to superscle 
 the use of the other faculties, but by training it to act in 
 subordination to them. He who reasons without facts must 
 always proceed in the dark ; while he who relies on isolated 
 facta, neither using his powers of generalization nor reason- 
 ing, must be willing to remain always a child. 
 
 SECTION IV. — THE IMPROVEMENT OF MEMORY. 
 
 From the preceding remarks, it is evidently of great 
 Importance to every educated man to be able in acquira 
 
IMPROVEMEM OF MEMORY. 255 
 
 knowledge rapidly, to retain it perrcnnentlr, aud to recall 
 it with ease To confer upon us this power, or, at least 
 to improve it, is one important object of intellectual disci- 
 pline. I shall proceed to illustrate some of the general 
 principles on -which the improvement of memory de[)end3. 
 My object is purely practical. I desire merely to present 
 Buch views of the subject as will enable us to give increased 
 efficiency to this important faculty. The facts which we 
 have to present are all withiii the range of every man'a 
 consciousness. But though nothing be added to our stock 
 of knowledge, something may, perhaps, be gained, if what 
 we already know can be directed more clearly to a valuable 
 end. 
 
 1. Memory, whether we consider its susceptibility, reten- 
 tiveness, or readiness, is strengthened only by habitual aud 
 earnest use. If unemployed, or not employed in diligent 
 study, its power will gradually diminish. This may be 
 illustrated in a variety of particulars. 
 
 Let a man find it necessary, for any particular purpose, 
 to remember an event, a conversation, or some passage in a 
 discourse, and he will find that the effort which he makes 
 confers upon him in some degree the power which he needs. 
 Let him be placed under the necessity of doing the same 
 thing ftequently, and statedly, and he soon becomes con- 
 scious that his power rapidly increases. It matters not 
 what may be the class of objects which we are called upon 
 to recollect, we recollect with ease what we find it necessary 
 to recollect habitually. The civil engineer remembers, with- 
 out effort, localities, the outline of a country, heights, dis- 
 tances, levels, water-courses, and whatever facts are impor- 
 tant in the practice of his profession. The merchant 
 remembers prices in different countries, the amount of pro- 
 duction in each for a great number of years, the wnaump- 
 tion under various ci'-sumstances, and the conditions hy 
 
256 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 which it is affected, the rates of exchange, and t le flucttt 
 ations of markets. The liwyer remembers, in the saim 
 manmr, decisions, arguments, analogies, precedents, and 
 cases. Neither of these could do more than verj imper 
 fectly what the other does with facility. The memory^ 
 strengthened by exercise in one particular department of 
 knowledge, is left in other respects almost in its natural 
 condition. 
 
 Nor is this all. The power of recalling our knowledge is 
 materially affected by the circumstances under which the 
 habit is cultivated. He who is accustomed to extemporary 
 speaking will find his recollection more active when in the 
 presence of an audience than in the retirement of his study. 
 He has made that most valuable acquisition, the power of 
 thinking upon his legs ; and he will perceive truth more 
 clearly, he will illustrate it more forcibly, and find all hig 
 knowledge more perfectly under his control, in these circum- 
 stances, than in any other. Another man, who has accus- 
 tomed himself solely to writing, finds his power of recollec- 
 tion much more active when surrounded by his books and 
 papers. The pen has become to him an almost indispensa- 
 ble instrument of thought, and, without it, he k fi-equently 
 and strangely at a loss. Neither of these men could do the 
 work of the other. Hence it is that so few men have been 
 successful in both written and extempore discourse. Hence 
 it is that, frequently, orations which have produced the 
 deepest impression during delivery, have appeared so tame 
 and lifeless when they have been committed to paper. The 
 excitement of delivery, which enabled the speaker to asso- 
 ciate so many images of beauty and sublimity with the sub- 
 ject-matter of his discourse, passed away when the orator 
 attempted to write, and little remains but the plain appeal 
 to the understanding. Cicero somewhere alludes to the 
 difficulty of attii'-"^ t<s great peifection in both wiiiten and 
 
IMrROVBMEUr OF MEMORY. 261 
 
 spoken discoui-se, an^ justlj, if not wisely, compliments biai' 
 aelf on having been successful where most other eminent 
 men had failed. 
 
 The effect of society upon the character of our recollection 
 has frequently been remarked. He Avho associates habitually 
 with men of distinguished colloquial ability, is placed undel 
 the necessity of recalling his knowledge on the instant, and 
 of recalling it on any subject that the occasion may demand. 
 The peculiar kind of recollection is also greatly mollified by 
 the company Avith which we associate. If our companions 
 are men of humor, we find ourselves involuntarily recalling 
 humorous events and droll associations. If we consort with 
 men of s 'ience, the mind takes a bias in a contrary direction 
 Thus a n.an of great colloquial excellence transforms into hia 
 >wn intellectual likeness those who are much in his society 
 An illustration of this remark is found in Boswell's Life of 
 Johnson. The associates of this great converser were re- 
 markable for their colloquial talent, and every individual 
 was more or less tinged with the peculiarities, Avhether 
 good or bad, of their master. Men of quite opposite ele- 
 ments of character were assimilated in their modes of 
 thought to him whom they all admired ; and they thug 
 formed a school, of which the lineaments were recognized 
 throughout the contemporary literary world. 
 
 Instances of the power of recalling all our knowledge 
 upon a given subject, are found in the lives of men who 
 have been successfully employed in the conduct of affair-s. 
 We see them forming plans for the future, embracing a 
 complicated variety of contingencies, for all of which provis- 
 ion must be made in advance. The motives of men must 
 be weighed, the effect of measures upon different govern- 
 ments estimated : action and reaction must be subjected to 
 deliberate calculation, and all the elements which wouW 
 advance or retard the design must be distinctly present to 
 22* 
 
258 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 the inind. The intellectual eifort required in a great niilitarj 
 commander is essentially the sanie. It is said that before 
 the Duke of Wellington took the command of the army of 
 the Peninsula, the jdan of operations which he subsequently 
 carried into effect had been thoroughly matured and ro- 
 solved upon. Every one must perceive the vast knowledge 
 of facts, and the wonderful accuracy of judgment, which wer^ 
 required in order to perfect a plan which could be carried 
 into effect in the midst of so many and so complicated con- 
 tingencies. Dumas also relates, that, when the Emperor 
 Napoleon '-decided to abandon the invasion of England, and 
 attack the Emperor of Austria, it was necessary to confide 
 to the chief of his staff not only the idea of the plan of the 
 campaign which he meditated, but, likewise, to develop all 
 the details. He dictated to M Daru, off-hand, and without 
 once stopping, those memorable instructions, that admirable 
 plan of the campaign, which we saw executed precisely a3 
 he had fixed it, doubtless after profound meditation. In 
 these instructions, the march of every day, the places at 
 which the army should arrive at successive periods, and the 
 place and almost the day on which the great battle should 
 be fought, were minutely specified. With these previous 
 instructions the actual result corresponded with astonishing 
 accuracy. Every one must be amazed at the amount and 
 the minuteness of the knowledge which could foresee and 
 provide for every emergency that might arise in so extended 
 and vast operations."' 
 
 I have pursued these illustrations beyond the limit which 
 the imporumce of the subject would seem to demand. The 
 olject which I have in view must plead my apology. J 
 have desired to give prominence to the fact that tbe memory 
 is readily improved by exercise, and that it improves in tlu 
 precise manner in which it is earnestly and habitually em 
 ployed. Every one must see that such command of ktviwl 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF MEMORY. 259 
 
 ?dge as I have exemplified could he the result of nothing 
 but assiduous and thorough "Cultivation. A lesson of practi- 
 cal value to the young may be learned from these consider- 
 ations. We are thus taught that we may, by diligent and 
 earnest effort, become equal to the discharge of dutiea 
 which now seem out of our power. The Duke of Welling- 
 ton, in early life, gave no indications of eminent ability. 
 We arc liable to error in supposing that because we do not 
 now possess the practical skill which a particular situation 
 demands, it would therefore be presumption in us to under- 
 take it. It is geneially safe to believe that what other men, 
 in the same circumstances, do, we, if the duty be imposed 
 upon us, can do also. But, while we adopt tliis rule, we 
 shall greatly err if we suppose that we shall be qualified for 
 any situation merely by being placed in it Place confers 
 no talent, and it communicates no knowledge , while, there- 
 fore, we rijay hope to do what other men have done, it must 
 be under the conditions in which other men have done it. 
 Unless we take the same pains, and subject ourselves to the 
 same discipline, as those who have succeeded, we shall un- 
 questionably fail. Inspiration is, at least, as rare now as it 
 has been in past ages ; and, if we would attain to success, 
 we must form Dur rules of conduct, not on exceptions, but 
 on general laws. To subject ourselves to the discipline 
 necessary to success, will not interfere with the inspirations of 
 genius ; while, should it happen that we are not inspired, 
 without such disci[)lne our failure will be inevitable. 
 
 2. It is a well-known fact that the power of recollection 
 depends greatly on attention. 
 
 The condition of mind which we denominate attention ia 
 that in which we direct our whole mental energies exclusively 
 to one particular object. It may proceed either from with- 
 out or from within ; from an objective or a subjective cause. 
 In tiie former case, the occurrence itself so entirely engrossei 
 
2G0 INTELLECTIAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 our thcuglits that, •without any volition, everything else ia 
 excluded from the mind. Let a traveller in Europe riJe 
 over a field rising and falling, now in regular and again in 
 iriegular slopes, Avith here and there a clump of trees, on 
 one side a windmill, and on the other an old stone house, and 
 it will leave no definite impression on his mind, lie can 
 look upon just such scenes anywhere, and he has seen just 
 as impressive landscapes every day of his life. His thoughts 
 may wander in the direction of home, and his conversation 
 turn to such subjects as the humor of the moment may sug- 
 gest. But let him be informed that this is the field of Wa- 
 terloo, that this eminence is Mount St. Jean, that yonder is 
 the farm-house of La Haye Sainte, that there is the thicket 
 and villa of Hougomont, and near him the tree under which 
 Wellington remained during the greater part of the action ; 
 that on the slopes beyond the French were posted, and there 
 in the vale is the spot where, for the first time, the Imperial 
 Guard faltered, mowed down in ranks, as they advanced to 
 the charge ; every other thought now vanishes from his 
 mind, and it is not possible for him to think of anything 
 but that terrible battle, on which the course of empire in 
 Europe depended. Such an impression is engraven on thi 
 memory forever. 
 
 In these cases, as I have said, the occasion of attention is 
 from without. It is arrested by objects around us, we are 
 conscious of no special mental effort when it is excited, and 
 we could not control it if we would. There is another and 
 very different form of attention, which depends upon the 
 exercise of our will. In this case, by an act of volition, wo 
 di.^miss all thought irrelevant to the subject before us, and 
 concenti-ate upon it all the mental energy of which we are ca- 
 pable. The more perfectly wo do this, the greater will be oui 
 power of recollection ; we shall thus acquire knowledge in 
 the shortest time, and retain it with the greatest success. The 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF MEA. DRY. 2G1 
 
 CLWi vhj hiivcbeen remarkable for great powers of memor^y 
 hare po.ssessed in a remarkable d<.>gree the power of abstract 
 attcution. The biographer of Johnson observes that wliile 
 he was reading the appearance of mental effort which he 
 exhibited was painful even to his companions. He seemea 
 wholly unconsc'ous of tlie existence of anything around him; 
 his countenance was flushed, the veins of his forehead became 
 distended, and his whole appearance betokened the intensest 
 mental concentration. A portrait, by Sir J. Reynolds, pre- 
 sents him in precisely this attitude. 
 
 Of the nature of attention, and the means by which it 
 may be cultivated, I have before treated ; I need not, there- 
 fore, repeat what I have said on this subject. It will be suf- 
 ficient to observe that, if we desire to improve the power of 
 memory, it is here that we must always commence. Until 
 we have learned to dismiss from our minds wandering and 
 irrelevant thought, and fix our intellectual energies on the 
 subject directly before us, we shall alwnys suffer the evils 
 of imperfect and feeble recollection. Attention, as we have 
 before observed, obeys the commands of a determined will. It 
 is thus in our own power to enlarge and strengthen our intel- 
 lectual faculties. A weak memory may be rendered strong, 
 and a fleeting recollection permanent, by resolutely laboring 
 to improve it. The remedy, however, resides in ourselves, 
 and it is the same for all. If we are willing to make the 
 sacrifices necessary to insure success, observing the laws by 
 which the improvement of our faculties is governed, there is 
 no one of our intellectual powers which may not be improved 
 fur beyond what at the commencement we should have be- 
 lieved possible. The men who earnestly labor to improve 
 themselves generally go beyond expectation ; those who rely 
 »n their undiscipl ned powers almost always fall short of it. 
 
 Urn, Dcyond this, we should labor to acquire, not merely 
 the power of o'^casional attentioUj but the habit of ccnstaat 
 
2G2 INTELLECTUAL PHILC3CPHT. 
 
 ind waKeful men*;al earnestness. In this manner, aloni, 
 does our exrstencj become in the highest degree valuable, 
 since every portion of it brings forth the richest and most 
 abundant fruit, and no hour and no occasion is suffered tfl. 
 run to waste An oasis in the desert is, by contrast, ex- 
 ceedingly beautiful and picturesque ; but how valueless i.'. 
 appears when compared with the broad acres of a cultivated 
 land, clothed as far as the eye can reach with exhaustlesg 
 fertility, the hills covered with flocks, the valleys loaded 
 with corn, supplying with prodigal liberality the wants of 
 '.very living thing that finds a home upon its bosom ! Sc 
 ihe transient efforts of genius may delight and surprise us; 
 but it is the steady labor of earnest minds that works out 
 those changes in public opinion, by which error is dissipated, 
 truth discovered and promulgated, and a new impulse 
 given to the progress of humanity in wisdom and virtue. 
 
 It is by acquiring this habit of constant and earnest 
 attention, and the power of transferring at will our whole 
 energy from one subject to another, that some men are en- 
 abled to perform an amount of intellectual labor which 
 seems almost incredible. The duties of the Chancellor of 
 Great Britain, in his judicial office the most important in 
 the kingdom, as speaker and a leading member of the 
 House of Lords, and frequently an active member of the 
 cabinet, could be successfully discharged by no one whose 
 intellect was not disciplined to incessant and intense exer- 
 tion. The same remark is applicable to every man who 
 stands in the front rank of any profession. The demand fof 
 eminent service is incessant ; and nothing can meet this 
 demand but a mind capable of putting forth its best efforts 
 without either cessation or weariness. 
 
 3. In the third place, readiness, or facility in recalling oui 
 knowledge, depends mainly upon the principles by which it 
 y associ-ited. The thought which we at this moment need 
 
IMrROVEilENT OF MEMORY. 262 
 
 B brought to our recoUectioa, because it has been connected, 
 by some liw of association, with a thought now present. 
 
 , Our associations are of two kinds, those by casual, and 
 those by permanent rehitions. Tlie associations whicii we 
 f(«-m from contiguity of time and phice, or from mere exter- 
 nal appearance, as color, size^ etc., are casual; those frim 
 cause and effect are permanent. When we see an event oc- 
 curring at a particular time and place, it by no means fol- 
 lows that a similar event will recur at the same place at a 
 corresponding time ; nor are similar events, by any tie 
 whatever, connected with, or related to, that time and place. 
 Hence, if we associate an event by these relations, there ia 
 nothing wliatever to recall our analogous knowledge. If, on 
 the other hand, we observe an event, and associate it with 
 its causes and effects, we know that the same cause, under 
 siniihir circumstances, will produce the same effect, and, 
 under modified circumstances, will produce modified effects. 
 Hence, this form of association connects with the even 
 which we wish to remember a multitude of other events, 
 any one of which, if present to the mind, may recall any 
 one or all of the others. 
 
 Inasmuch, then, as casual associations furnish no bond of 
 connection by which facts are associated together, they can 
 furnish little aid to the memory, and can assist us but feebly 
 in the investigation of truth. If a lawyer associated caseg 
 merely with the court-rooms in which they happened to be 
 decided, his knowledge would 1 3nder but little service in 
 the practice of his profession. He must remember them by 
 their connection with the principles of equity, if he wishea 
 to recall them whenever an analogous case occurs in the 
 course of his pleadings. Were they associated merely by 
 time and place, the most dissimilar decisions would be 
 grouped together, so th-it he could rarely call to mind those 
 adapted to his purpose. If he associate them by the pi in- 
 
2iJi INTELLECTUAL PKILOSOPHT. 
 
 ciples to which thej are allied, each case would recall tne 
 principle, and the principle the cases which it controllei? 
 Knowledge, in this manner, becomes linked together. A 
 single fact brings with it the recollection of a multitude of 
 other facts, and these form the basis of important generaliza- 
 tions, or the materials for apt and ample illustration. 
 
 Or, again, suppose we witness a philosophical experiment. 
 By casual association, we should connect it with nothing 
 but the pkice in which it was performed ; and the various 
 steps of the process would be thought of only in the order 
 of their succession. All that would remain to us would be 
 the naked facts, that, at such a time and place, in such a 
 lecture-room, the first event was followed by the second, 
 and the second by the third, and so on to the end. If. on 
 the contrary, the relations of cause and effect were clearly 
 explained, and every change referred to its appropriate la w, 
 we should know not only the succession of changes, but 
 the law which governed each succession. Hence, e;ich event 
 will be associated with the others by a definite and un- 
 changing connection. Ever afterwards, any event in the 
 series will readily call to recollection those thus associated 
 with it, and also the law on which the succession depended ; 
 and any one of these laws will also recall not only these 
 efiects, but many others which at any time we may have 
 had occasion to observe. 
 
 From these illustrations it is evident that readiness, oi 
 the power of }ecaliing our knowledge, depends greatly upon 
 philosophical association In order to associate in this man- 
 ner, we must form the habit of referring facts to the laws 
 on which they depend, and of tracing out laws to the facts by 
 which they are exemplified. If we observe a phenomenon, 
 W3 should, if possible, ascertain its cause. If we examin« 
 a specimen, we should refer it to its class. If we study a^ 
 event, we should observe its necessary relations to the eventfl 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF MEMORY. 2fi.'i 
 
 >?hich preceded and which have succeeded it. So, on the 
 other hand, if we have comprehended an abstract principle, 
 we shoukl not be satisfied until we have transformed it into 
 a concrete expression, observed the facts bj which it is illus- 
 trated, and the results to which it leads. If, for instance, 
 we comprehend a general law in mechanics, we should woik 
 out problems which illustrate its mode of operation, until 
 the law and tbe facts which depend upon k are so thoroughly 
 associated together that they form one clearly defined and 
 well digested conception. So, in political economy, if we 
 are satisfied that a law is true, we should not rest until, if 
 possible, we have exhausted the results to which it will, of 
 necessity, lead ; and, on the other hand, if we observe a new 
 fact in the movements of commerce, or the operations of 
 finance, we should trace it back to its legitimate cause, and 
 determine the law to which it owes its existence. 
 
 In this respect, our systems of education are probably 
 defective. We determine, in the first place, that a certain 
 number of sciences must be learned in a given time. In 
 the time allotted to each, it may be possible either to com- 
 municate to the pupil some of the facts without the general 
 principles, or some of the principles without the facts ; but 
 not to associate the principles with the facts by the patient 
 labor of tracing out their connections with each other. It 
 is by this latter mode of acquisition that the mind attains 
 power and alertness. He who has thus mastered a single 
 science has gained far better mental discipline than by 
 cursory attention to several. He who has learned one thing 
 tb -» oughly knows how other things also are to be learned ; 
 and he who has proceeded as far as this has made no con- 
 temptible progress m his education. 
 
 But. though a system of education does not accomplish all 
 that might be desired, it may yet be of great value. We 
 may derive important advantage from a listinct knowledge 
 
 2a 
 
266 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 of general principles, although we have but little powei 
 of carrying them into practice. If we have gained 3slj sc 
 much knowledge that we are able, in subsequent life, to rcfei 
 common facts to general laws, or even to understand the 
 reference when it is made bj others, we have laid the foun- 
 dations of philosophical association. The observations occur- 
 ring in our daily occupations will, from time to time, revive 
 and enlarge our Knowledge. Every general law acquired 
 in y)uth thus becomes a nucleus, on which our additional 
 attainments crystallize, and the mass increases by continued 
 aggregation. Hense it is often observed that young men, 
 vho are well grounded in the severer studies, attain, in the 
 3nd, to a larger intellectual growth, and succeed much bet- 
 ter in professional life, than those of greater brilliancy, who 
 aim at more general attainments, and devote their time tc 
 what is called universal reading. 
 
 From these remarks we learn the value of hypotheses in 
 philosophy. An hypothesis is a conception of the causes 
 of a phenomenon which has not yet been established by 
 proof Since it is not established, it is of no positive valid- 
 ity, and can neither be received as a truth, nor mt.de the 
 basis of scientific reasoning. Yet it is not, therefore, value 
 less. It oflFers to our consideration a conjectural law. Ii. 
 to this law we can refer a number of phenomena Avhich 
 were before isolated, we are the better able to retain them 
 in the memory. Suppose, for instance, several isolated facts 
 havo been observed in geology, for which no cause has been 
 discovered. A theory is proposed which, if it be allowed, 
 will account for the whole, or a considerable part of them. 
 This is an hypothesis. By grouping them together as the 
 result of this supposed cause, an important aid is rendered 
 to our recollection. Burke, I believe, remarks that an hy- 
 pothesis is good for as much as it will explain. Anhypoih' 
 «is, moreover, presents a definite subject for investigation 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF MEMO: Y. 267 
 
 If it bo prcved false, science is the gainer bj the research 
 which it has occasioned ; if it be proved true, an addition ia 
 made to the knowledge of man. 
 
 4. Readiness of memory is materially assisted by method- 
 ical arrangement. 
 
 Every one knows the difficulty of remembering isolated 
 and disconnected items, such as a number of words selected 
 at random, or a column of miscellaneous figures. This 
 difficulty is greatly diminished by arranging these several 
 items according to some general conception, as, for instance, 
 by placing the words in alphabetical order, or grouping 
 them according to the subjects to which they relate. By 
 Buch an adjustment some principle of connection is imme- 
 diately established, and, as one suggests the following, we 
 easily commit them to memory, and more readily recall 
 them afterwards. 
 
 It is obvious that all sciences, from the necessity of the 
 case, are susceptible of a natural arrangement. In the dis 
 covery of knowledge, as I have before remarked, we pro- 
 ceed from individuals to generals, and from less to more 
 general, until we arrive at the most comprehensive genua 
 which the present state of knowledge admits. In the com- 
 munication of knowledge, this process is exactly reversed; 
 we commence with the most comprehensive genus, and pro- 
 ceed step by step to tiie less comprehensive, until we arrive 
 at varieties and individuals. So, when, iu any case, we 
 desire to communicate truths, by patient reflection we sliall 
 be able to discover the general principle on which the whole 
 essentially depends When this is clearly displayed, it sug- 
 gests in natural succession whatever is to follow. The order 
 in which science thus arranges itself, confers important as- 
 sistance on the memory. When knowledge has no relation 
 to time, we proceed from more to less genera, truth. WiiCO 
 time enters into the development of a subjec the order of 
 
2t58 INTELLECTUAL PHILJJSOPHT. 
 
 cause and effect is to be preferred. Thus in \atural Ins- 
 torjr, we prcxjeed from genera to species ; in history, we follo\i 
 the order of time, which here is also the order of cause and 
 eflfe^^*. In political economy, we treat, in succession, of pro- 
 duction, exchange, distribution, and consumption ; becauso 
 this is the order of the dependence of one class of actions 
 upon another, and this is the order of changes through 
 ^hich any object passes that is modified by the industry 
 of man. It is easy to perceive that our power of recalling 
 our knowledge of any subject, must be greatly increased by 
 the simplicity and clearness with which it was arranged, 
 when it was treasured up in the memory. 
 
 When any branch of knowledge is thus reduced to method, 
 we can readily commence with its more general and element- 
 ary principles, and trace them through their subsidiary 
 ramifications, each genus suggesting the several species 
 <vhich it includes, until all our acquisitions on this subject 
 Are spread in one view before the mind. The want of such 
 nn arrangement is, not unfrequently, a serious embarrass- 
 ment to a student. He sometimes finds important truths 
 carelessly thrown together — principles and results, causeg 
 and effects, in a condition of hopeless dislocation ; so that to 
 treasure them up as available knowledge in their present 
 form is almost impossible. In this case, if the knowledge ia 
 worth the trouble, our best method is to think the subject 
 out and rearrange it for ourselves. This will require time, 
 but it is the only way in which knowledge so inartistically 
 presented can be rendered useful to the student. The great 
 work of Adam Smith, which has wrought so wonderful 
 changes in the policy of nations, would have achieved its 
 triumph at a much earlier period if its effects had not be'on 
 weakened by great want of systematic arrangemer t. 
 
 The power of clear and well-digested metliod is of greal 
 
IMl'ROVEMEXT UF MEMORY. 20^ 
 
 ralue, not onlj to the student himself, but also to those 
 to whuni he communicates knowledge. The preacher, who 
 will take the trouble to acquire it, will not so often complain 
 that his teachings are forgotten, or that his audience is in- 
 attentive. The lawyer will thus be enabled greatly to 
 abridge his proceedings, and at the same time leave a 
 Btronger and more durable impression on the court and the 
 jury. In our addresses to our fellow-men, I hardly know 
 of an acquisition of greater importance than this, or one 
 that aids more powerfully our efforts to produce conviction. 
 From what has been said, we perceive the incorrectness of 
 the opinion, that the memory resembles a store-house, which 
 may be filled to overflowing, or so filled as to render further 
 acquisitions more and more diflBcult. If the student have 
 used his memory aright, the greater his acquisitions the 
 easier will subsequent acquisitions become. If he have 
 formed the habit of concentrated thought, the less effort will 
 be required to fix his attention. If he habitually refei his 
 ■ facts to principles, he will successively arise to higher and 
 higher generalizations, and the knowledge which he acquires 
 will connect itself by more and more numerous associations. 
 We are never embarrassed by the amount of our knowledge, 
 but only by its miscellaneous and disorderly variety. If 
 reflection upon a subject presents us with nothing but a 
 multitude of irrelevant and disconnected facts, without gen- 
 eralization or arrangement, we may well complain of being 
 overburdened with knowledge. But, when reflection yields 
 the fruit of apposite principles and illustrative liicts, the 
 wider the range of our acquisitions the greater will be our 
 jitellectual power. It is in conset|uence of the formation 
 )f such habits that an accomplished public speaker .re- 
 juently astonishes us, by discoursing with ample fulness, and 
 with the clearest method, upon occasions wl ich allowed nc 
 opportunity for previous preparation. The attainment of 
 23* 
 
270 IXTELLECTIJAL PHILOSOPHI. 
 
 such a power is certainlj worth all the labor which it can 
 possibly dera.ind. 
 
 Of artificial memory. 
 
 Besides the means for the cultivation 'f memory which 1 
 have suggested above, others, depending upcn artificial as- 
 Bociation, have been frequently recommended. Cicero some- 
 where mentions the systems of this kind which were in use 
 in his time. It may be well to indicate the principles on 
 which such systems are founded. 
 
 When we wish to remember a particular fact, we fre- 
 quently associate it with something which we cannot easily 
 forget. We sometimes see men desiring to recollect an 
 engagement tie a knot in their handkerchief, or bind a 
 atring around one of their fingers. In artificial memory, a 
 regular system of signs is employed for a similar purpose. 
 I remember a lecturer on mnemonics, who used for this pur- 
 pose a sheet or two of paper, divided into a large number 
 of compartments, in each of which was engraved a figure of 
 some well-known object. When a number of items, as a 
 column of words, was to be remembered, the pupil waa 
 taught to associate each word with an object in one of these 
 compartments. In this manner a large number of partic- 
 ulars might be remembered for a short time. The system, 
 however, which has maintained the most permanent reputa 
 tion, is that of Gray, in his Memoria Technica, a work of 
 which Dr. Johnson speaks somewhere with great respect. 
 The nature of this system may be known from a single 
 example. Suppose the object is to remember numbers. 
 The vowels, diphthongs, and the most important consonants, 
 ^re so arranged as to correspond Avith the nine digits and 
 Eij.'ier, hi the following manner : 
 
 a e i o u au oi ei ou y 
 12&456 78 90 
 bdtflBkknx. 
 
ARTIFICIAL MKMOUY. 273 
 
 This table 'naj be used thus : Sup^wsc; that I Avished to remem- 
 ber the fact that Julius Caesar arrived at the supreme powei 
 in the year 46, B. C. I observe that the letter o is above 
 4, and the letter s under 6. Forty-six is then represented 
 by the syllable os. I write Julios for Julius, and thus 
 recall this date to ray recollection. Or, again : Alexander 
 f^'.Muled his empire in 331, B. C. The number 331, as 
 befor: explained, may be expressed by the letters ila I 
 then wi ite Alex«7a instead of Alexander, and am thus re- 
 minded of the date in question. Various other systems 
 have been devised, but they all depend upon similar prin- 
 siples. 
 
 Of the utility of this method of aiding the memory, I 
 am unable to speak from experience. I have, however, ob- 
 served, that, whatever may be the immediate effect of these 
 systems, they are generally soon laid aside. It seems aa 
 difficult to remember the system as to remember the knowl- 
 edge which it would enable us to retain. Whatever be ita 
 virtue, it can confer upon us no valuable mental discipline. 
 It would seem better, therefore, to cultivate the memory by 
 those methods which give increased vigor to all our other 
 intellectual faculties. When a subject is capable of philo- 
 sophical association, it is surely better to fix it in our recol- 
 lection by philosophical arrangement. When the matter to 
 be remembered is names, dates, or other isolated fiicts, it is 
 better to refer to tables and books, where such knowledge ia 
 to be feuud, than to trust to our memory, unless we are 
 endowed with special facility for this sort of acquisition. 
 
 There is, however, one mode of rendering our knowle Ige 
 BvailaWe, which seems to me of great value. It is a well- 
 arranged common-place book, or a book made for the pur- 
 pose of recording any important items of knowledge in such 
 manner as to be easily accessible. The Ilev. Dr. Todd, of 
 PiUsfield, Mass., has prepared a work exceedingly weU 
 
il'J INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 adapted to this purpose. It is called an "Index Rerum.'' 
 It consists of blank leaves ruled and paged, with the letters 
 of the alphabet, so that a student can readily insert a word 
 designating a particular subject, and under this word record 
 all the places in which he finds this subject treated. A 
 student, by the use of such a book, would be able to refer to 
 all the works which he had read on any particular subject, 
 by glancing at a single entry in his index. His common- 
 place book would thus be an index to his whole library; 
 enabling him, in the shortest time, and with the least trouble, 
 to render all his past reading available for immediate use 
 whenever he should require it. 
 
 At the risk of some repetition, I shall close this part of 
 the subject with a few directions for study, deduced from the 
 preceding remarks : 
 
 1. We should employ our minds as little as possible in 
 those occupations which require no effort of attention. 
 He who spends much of his time in reading that which ho 
 does not wish to remember, will find his power of acquisi- 
 tion rapidly to diminish. Light reading is entitled to ita 
 place, and need not be proscribed altogether. But light 
 reading need not be useless reading. Facts of all kinds, to 
 him who is able to make a proper use of them, are always 
 of inestimable value. But much that is called light read- 
 ing tends to no result whatever except present amusement 
 and nothing is more destructive of every manly energy than 
 amusement pursued as a business. Nor let it be supposed 
 that the vigorous employment of our faculties is destitute 
 of its appropriate enjoyment. Here, as everywhere else, 
 happiness is found, not when we seek for it directly, but 
 when, thoughtless of ourselves, we are honestly doing our 
 duty. The weariness caused by labor is relieved either by 
 rest or by a change of pursuits, and thr mind returns witli 
 'enewed relish to its appointed labors. But what ?hang« 
 
IMPllOVEMKNT OF MEMORi 27i 
 
 can relieve an intellect jaded and worn down by excessive 
 excitement, md vexed with the incessant craving of unsat- 
 isiied desires 7 
 
 2. Wo should strive to observe accurately every fact, and 
 comprehend clearly every truth to which our attention may 
 be directed. In this manner alone can we attain to precis- 
 ion of thought and distinctness of conception. We shall 
 thus learn the difference between what we know and what 
 we do not know ; an attainment of more value than might 
 at first seem manifest. He whose mind habitually rejects 
 crude and undigested conceptions, and vague and intangible 
 theories, has made no inconsiderable progress in intellectual 
 cultivation. Nor is it enough that a man can comprehend 
 w hat an author has written while the book is under his eye. 
 He should attain to such a knowledge of the subject that he 
 can think it out for himself in his own language, and trace 
 its connections and dependencies by means of illustrations 
 of his own. In this manner he will be able to understand 
 what he reads, to remember what he understands, and to 
 recall what he has remembered whenever the occasion ren- 
 ders it necessary. 
 
 I am aware that this method of study will seem to rec^uire 
 a much longer time, and restrict us to a much slower 
 progress, than the course commonly pursued. A man will 
 be obliged to select his books with greater care, and devote 
 to his reading a more vigorous and protracted effort, than ia 
 generally thought necessary. He may thus lose, if he ever 
 possessed it, the reputation of genius ; but, what is more 
 important, he may find the reality. By forming the habit 
 of earnest and habitual attention, he may thus acquire thai 
 p'.-'wer which is the very element of genius. At first, the 
 uind laboring in this manner may seem to act slowly ; but, 
 as soon as effort becomes its natural condition, vigorous 
 action will be as rapid as any other. Those who thiui 
 
274 IXTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 inteii3cly, if thej do it habitually, require less time thjuj 
 other men to perfect their mental operations. It is thus that 
 the powers of the mind are carried to their highest perfection, 
 and those intellectual labors are performed which to cthe.' 
 men seem almost miraculous. 
 
 3. Our knowledge should, as far as possible, be philosoph- 
 icjllv arranged. F?.-3ts should be accounted for, that is. 
 referred to their appropriate laws ; and laws should be es: 
 emplified until the use of them becomes perfectly familiar. 
 In this respect students are very prone to err. I have fre- 
 [juently seen young men, who could pass a creditable exam- 
 ination in the rules of rhetoric, who could not successfully 
 construct a discourse on the simplest subject, and who were 
 unable to write three consecutive sentences without a blun- 
 der. Every one perceives that knowledge of this kind is 
 useless, and must soon be forgotten. It is this habit of com- 
 bining theory with practice which, most of all, confers pro- 
 fessional ability. 
 
 The importance of arranging our knowledge methodically, 
 that is, in its relations to the general principles on which it 
 depends, need not again be insisted on. I will, therefore, 
 only add that, in all our efforts to improve our minds, we 
 should be patient with ourselves. Bad habits cannot be 
 corrected except by the formation of good ones ; and to form 
 habits of any kind is a work of time. Strenuous effort, if 
 we give it time enough, will accomplish all that we could 
 Jesire. "We must not, however, be disconcerted at the 
 imperfect success of our incipient efforts. Each one will 
 accomplish something ; and every effort accomplished, though 
 but imperfectly, will render less difficult that which succeeds. 
 Those who have been the most successful in the end have 
 frequently confessed that their first attempts were marke<l 
 by mortifying failure. It was thus with Demosthenes ; and 
 if -uore mon were blessed with his determination to succeed 
 
IM^ROVEME^'T OP ilEMORT. -76 
 
 the wcrlii ^ould not so often have complained of ihc small 
 number of great orators. 
 
 The application of the preceding remarks to the duties of 
 an instructor is apparent. 
 
 The object of a teacher is to communicate knowledge, and 
 80 to communicate it as to develop and strengtlien the 
 powers of the mind. Hence, in order to succeed, he must 
 observe the laws to which the mind is subjected. The mind 
 of the pupil is similar to the mind of the teacher, age only 
 excepted. The course which has proved most successful with 
 the one, will prove the most successful with the other. K 
 we bear this in mind, we shall perceive the importance of 
 the following suggestions : 
 
 1. I have remarked that our power of recollection depends 
 greatly upon the clearness of our conceptions. Now, the 
 ability of young persons to comprehend complicated rela- 
 tions is, of course, much less than of adults. It is, there- 
 fore, the duty of the instructor to analyze what is complex 
 and simplify what is intricate, or else so to direct the mind 
 of the pupil that he can do it for himself In this manner 
 every kind of knowledge adapted to the age of the pupil 
 may be brought within his intellectual grasp. The in- 
 structor should not merely hold forth to the pupil what is 
 laid down in the books, but think it out for himself, observe 
 its elements, and separate them from each other, so that he 
 may place them in the clearest light before the conception 
 of the pupil. In these respects instructors frequently fail. 
 Sometimes they have no clear idea of a subject themselves, 
 and, of course, can convey none to others. They merely 
 inculcate by rote what they hive learned by rote themselves. 
 Sometimes an instructor, who understands a subject himself 
 forgets the labor by which his knowledge was acquired, anj 
 becomes unconscious of the difference between himself and 
 his pupil. What is very siirple to him now, appeals to him 
 
£76 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 of course, simple to every one. What became fainiliar ta 
 him only by severe and protracted effort, seems capable of 
 being learned by his pupil in a shorter time than is actually 
 possible. In these respects it becomes an instructor to be on 
 his guard. He should consider, not what he can do now, but 
 what he could have done when under the circumstances of 
 his pupils. He should, therefore,*^be careful to assure him- 
 Belf that what he tea«.hes is understood. He who will bear 
 these things in mind will not often have to complain of the 
 stupidity of his pupils. When an instructor finds all his 
 pupils blockheads, the indication is certainly ambiguous; 
 there is a blockhead somewhere, but whether it be either 
 the teacher or the pupil becomes a proper subject of 
 inquiry. 
 
 2. What has been rendered simple may be easily illus- 
 trated. Skill in illustration, therefore, is of great impor- 
 tance to a teacher. He perhaps presents to a pupil a new 
 idea which is not readily comprehended. Tlie conception 
 of the one is not grasped by the other ; or, if it is, the pupil 
 does not certainly know that the idea in his mind is that 
 which the teacher means to communicate. The teacher 
 must, therefore, call up some analogous idea with which the 
 pupil is familiar, so that, from ground common to both, he 
 may pass by easy gradation to tliat which is new and 
 uncompreliended. Things dissimilar in themselves fre- 
 quently stand to each other in similar relations, thus 
 affording wide range for analogies. In this manner the 
 known is made to teach the unknown. Nor is this all. 
 The illustration associates a new with a familiar idea. 
 i\n interesting and apposite image is presented, and thus 
 whatever is learned is more easily remembered. An illus- 
 tration addressed to the eye is always the most successful. 
 Hence, maps, diagrams, experiments, are among the meal 
 uidispcnsable aids of an instructor. 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF MEMORY. 271 
 
 3. It 13 ccarcelj necessary to add that the piogrcsa 
 of the pupil will be greatly accelerated by reducing his 
 knowledge, as far as possible, to practice. From the neces- 
 sity of the case, it is evident that much of the pupil" s time 
 must be occupied in learning rules. If, however, the teach 
 iug is confined to these alone, it becomes intolerably irksome 
 The mind struggles against it, and is willing quickly to forget 
 what is associated with nothing but pain. These difficuliics, 
 however, may in a great degree be removed, by teaching the 
 pupil, as soon as he has learned a rule, to put it into prac- 
 tice. He then discovers that the knowledge of rules is a 
 means of power, for it enables him to do what he could not 
 do before, and he becomes conscious of progress and 
 increased ability. Every step in advance brings with it 
 an immediate reward, and he proceeds to the next step with 
 new consciousness of power, and more earnest desire r^r 
 other acquisitions. It was formerly the practice to carry a 
 boy through the Latin grammar before he began to trans- 
 late a word ; and months were consumed in this dry and 
 repulsive labor. It would be no wonder if, under such a 
 discipline, he learned to abominate the grammar, the lan- 
 guage, and the instructor, together. But if, as soon as he 
 has learned a single rule, or mastered a single inflexion, ho 
 is taught to use it in the construction of easy phrases, and 
 when, with the knowledge thus gained, he proceeds to the 
 next rule, and finds the increased power derived from adding 
 these knowledges together, further progress becomes desira- 
 ble in itself, and learning is no longer a drudgery. While it 
 would be absurd to say that, in all respects, our modes of 
 teaching are preferable to those of oui lathers, it is delight- 
 ful to a l)enevolent nv.nd to contemplate the improvements 
 which have been introduced in the modes of instructing the 
 young. The labor required is better adapted to the faculties 
 of the learner, though here, it must be conft'iS(;d, we yd 
 24 
 
278 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSjrHY. 
 
 need improvement. Study ministers more to i^e growth df 
 the mind, instead of being a barren exercise of memorj ; ana 
 a vast amount of misery has been lifted off from the human 
 race — certainly no trifling consideration. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Relation of memory to philosophical genius — Stewart, toL i., chap ^ 
 lection 8. 
 
 Improvement of memory — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 6, section 3. 
 
 Effect of practice in formation of habits — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 2. 
 
 Theory and practice — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 4, section 7. 
 
 Attention connected with memory — Locke, Book 2, chap. 10, section 8 j 
 A.bercrombie, Part 3, section 1. 
 
 Connected knowledge easily retained — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 6, section 
 t ; sections 1, 2, 4 ; Abercrombie, Part 3, section 1. 
 
 Memory aided by method — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 6, section 3 ; Ab«r 
 erombie. Part 3, section 1. 
 
 Nature and use of hypothesis — Locke, Book 4, chap. 12, sections 12, 
 13 ; Abercrombie, Part 3, section 4 ; Stewart, vol. i., chap. 6, section 7. 
 
 Artificial memory — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 6, section G. 
 
 Rules for study — Stewart, vol. L, chap. 6, section 5. 
 
 Effects of writing on memory — Stewart, vol. i., chap 6, section 6. 
 
 Visible objects easily renembered — Stewart, vol. i., <hap. '», enitiao 2 
 
 M«iMiy a stcrehcise — Reid, Eas&y 8, obsf. 7. 
 
CHAPTER VI 
 
 REASONING. 
 
 81CTI0N I. THE NATURE AND OBJECT OF REARONiNd, 
 
 AND THE MANNER IN WHICH IT PROCEEDS. 
 
 We now come to the consideration of that series of men« 
 tal acts denominated reasoning. Before, however, we entei 
 upon this branch of our subject, it may be useful to review 
 again, very briefly, the ground which we have gone over, 
 that we may distinctly perceive the point from which we 
 proceed, and learn the relation -which this form of mental 
 action holds to tiie other acts of the mind. 
 
 By our perceptive powers, we become acquainted with the 
 qualities of external objects, and, in general, with the facta 
 in the external world. By our consciousness, we learn the 
 facts existing in the world within us. By original sugges- 
 tion, various intuitive truths and relations become objects 
 of cognition. By abstraction, conceptions of individuals 
 assume the form of general ideas ; and by memory, all this 
 knowledge is retained and recalled to our consciousness a* 
 the command of the will. 
 
 Were we endowed with no other powers than these, we 
 might enjoy the pleasures of knowledge. Whatever we had 
 obsei ved or experienced, and whatever had been observed 
 wid experienced by others, might be retained, generalised 
 ind combined, and thus our acquisitions might be both ex- 
 
280 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 tensive and valuable. But, with no other faculties, we could 
 onlj know what we or other men had actually observed or 
 experienced. We could never make use of this knowledge to 
 penetrate into the unknown. In a word, we could observe, 
 and feel, and generalize, and classify, and remember, but 
 we could not reason. 
 
 But such is not the condition of the human mind. As 
 Boon as we acquire any knowledge whatever, we are prompted 
 to use it for the purpose of acquiring other knowledge. We 
 are continually saying to ourselves, if this be thus, then 
 this other must be so ; or this must be so. because this and 
 that are so. If this be so, what must of necessity follow 7 
 This is the language of human beings, young and old, salv- 
 age and civilized, learned and ignorant. It is the impulse 
 of our common nature, and one of the endowments with 
 which we have been blessed by a merciful Creator. He haa 
 enabled us to cognize relations existing between certain 
 truths, from which emanate other truths different from the 
 preceding, but which, without a knowledge of them, could 
 never have been discovered. 
 
 The results of the exercise of this faculty have been most 
 astonishing. Unlike our other endowments, eveiy one of 
 its acts provides a wider field for its future employment, and 
 thus its range is absolutely illimitable. The perception of 
 one color gives me no additional power to perceive anothei 
 color. A fact remembered furnishes only accidentally a 
 basis or an aid to wider recollection. But every truth dis- 
 covered by the reasoning power, and, in fact, every truth, 
 however acquired, becomes, by use of this power, the means 
 for proceeding to further discovery. Through the element- 
 ary cognitions in geometry, our reason at first disoovera 
 certain truths concerning lines, angles and triangles. 
 Using these increased menns of knowledge, it pr teeeds todis* 
 w ver truths ccucerning circles and squares uud, using 
 
REASOXIX'i. i^Si 
 
 these again, it discovere those concerning solids, spheres and 
 apherical triangles ; and, using these again, it has been al)le 
 to reveal to us the magnitude, distances and motions, of the 
 heavenly bodies, and thus unfold the wonders of modern 
 astronomy. The knowledge which -we thus obtain '.s o^-i 
 ginal knowledge ; that k, it is given us specially by this 
 faculty, and could be given us by no other. How could wo 
 ever learn the distance or magnitude or mot'on of the plan- 
 ets, either by perception, or consciousness, or original sug- 
 gestion, or abstraction, or memory ? The same remark is 
 true respecting the other sciences. Every science which 
 presents to us knowledge which could not be attained by the 
 powers above mentioned, must rely for its discoveries wholly 
 on reasoning. 
 
 We see, then, the nature of this faculty. It cognizes 
 nothing directly and immediately. It neither perceives the 
 facts of the outward nor is conscious of the facts of the 
 inward world; it furnishes no original suggestions, and 
 neither abstracts nor remembers ; but it receives these data 
 as they are delivered to it by these preceiling faculties, and, 
 by a process of its own, uses them to discover new truths, 
 to which none of them could ever have attained. The man- 
 ner in which this is done, we shall attempt to explain. 
 
 Reasoning consists in a series of mental acts, by which 
 we show such a relation to exist between the known and the 
 unknown, that if the former be true, the latter must also be 
 equally true. Thus, in geometry, the known with which 
 we commence is the definitions and axioms. Our fii-st dem- 
 ju«tration shows such relations to exist between them and 
 the first proix)sition. that if those be true this must be true 
 also. This first proposition is thus added to the known, 
 and becomes as firm a ground from which to reason as the 
 definitions and axioms from which we at first proceeded. In 
 our next step we again show, by jur reasoning powers, that 
 24* 
 
282 TNTELLLCTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 if tin? increased known be true, the second proposition ranaf 
 be true also. We tlien add our second pioposition to the 
 known, and with this increase^f material of knowledge pro- 
 ceed to the thiid proposition and so on continually. In 
 each act of reasoning, we observe first the known, reaching 
 10 a definite limit, beyond which all is unceitainty. We 
 )bsf.rve^ secondly, a proposition in the unknown which may 
 be *rue or may be false, of which nothing can with certainty 
 be aflirmed. separated from the known by a chasm, so to 
 speak, of thus far impassable ignorance. The reasoning 
 power projects a bridge across this chasm, uniting them 
 indissolubly together, transforming the unknown into tht 
 known, adding a new domain to science, and enlarging b^ 
 every such act tfee area of human knowledge 
 
 If such be the nature of the mental process wh'ch we 
 denominate reasoning, it suggests to us three distinct topics 
 for consideration : 
 
 First, the nature of the truths from which we proceed. 
 
 Secondly, the validity of the results at which we arrive. 
 
 Thirdly, the nature of the process by which we pass 
 from the one to the other. 
 
 To the consideration of these subjects the remainder of 
 ibis secti( i will be devoted. 
 
 I. T/f . nature of the truths from xchich we pro- 
 ceed. 
 
 I ha"., already said that, in reasoning, we design to show 
 that if ^rtain things are true, certain other things, whose 
 truth iL. now unknown, must be true also. We then must. 
 .•)f necessity, proceed from the true to the doubtful, from the 
 known to the unknown. The premises are always, at the 
 commencement, hetttr known than the conclusion at which wo 
 propose to arrive. From this it is evident that we can never 
 reason ualess from what is either known or conceded ; and, 
 further, *hat we can never prove any proposition unless tv« 
 
FIRST TRUTHS. 283 
 
 can fiud some other proposition better known bj wliich tc 
 prove it. If any proposition is to be proved, all otlier pos- 
 sible propositions must stand to it in one of three relations 
 either kss known, equally k/ioirn, or better known. Tf 
 attempt to prove what we knojc by wliat we do not know. 
 or to prove what we know by what we do not know as well^ 
 is absurd. Inasmuch as proof brings the conclusion to fe- 
 jisely the level of the premises, a process of this kind would 
 liminish instead of increasing the certainty of our conclu- 
 :icn. That an error of this kind cannot be committed, 1 
 *-ouid not, however, assert. We not unfrequently hea? 
 men attempt to prove, what every one at the beginning al- 
 lows, but which, at the conclusion of the argument, every 
 one ia disposed to doubt. Such must always be the resalt 
 when we attempt to prove self-evident truths. Secondly ; to 
 attempt to prove either what we know or what we do not 
 know, by what we only know equally u-ell, is nugatory. 
 We of course know no better at the end than at '.be begin- 
 ning of our argument, and all our labor is bj riecessity 
 thrown away. We could not, by a life's labor in this man- 
 ne»", advance a single step in knowledge. Hen ,'e we can 
 never prove any propoj-ition, unless we can find some prop- 
 ositions better known than that which we desiie to prove. 
 Hence it follows, that, when we find a proposition so evident 
 that no proposition more evident can be discovered, the 
 truth of such a proposition cannot be established by the 
 reasoning faculty. If it be true, its truth must be deter- 
 mined by some other power of the mind. Hence, all rea- 
 soning must commence from truths noi made known by the 
 reason, that is, which the intellection perceives to be true 
 previous to all reasoning, and from whicN all the deductions 
 of reason proceed. Let us consider the vt'xre of some of 
 tliese elementary beliefs, which lie ai iLv '•/?.u"',\lion of all 
 reasoning. 
 
284 raiELLECrJxL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Were nothing more required than that a man should v.on- 
 vince himself of the truth of any proposition, n )thing mora 
 would be necessary than that he himself was satisfied that 
 his premises were true. I do not, of course, say that ho 
 would thus, of necessity, arrive at truth, but he would be 
 able to convince himself of the truth of the proposition in 
 question. But, if we reason for the purpose of convincing 
 another man, it is obvious that he also must admit with us 
 the truth of our premises, or the propositions from which we 
 proceed. Unless the two can agree in the premises, argue 
 as long as they may, they can make no progress towards a 
 conclusion. The argument Avhich convinces the one has no 
 effect on the other, since he denies the premises on which it 
 is founded. No argument, then, can have any power over 
 the mind of another, unless both equally admit the truth of 
 the premises on which the conclusion rests. But what is 
 rue of any two men, is true of all men collectively. We 
 ■.an never convince the human mind of the truth of our 
 conclusions, unless there be some truths from which we 
 proceed, which all men equally with ourselves admit prior 
 to all argument. If such truths did not exist, all reasoning 
 addressed to the human race would be nugatory and use- 
 less. When men reason at great length, without coming to 
 a conclusion, the cause of their difficulty generally is, that 
 they have no principles in common. Hence, when w^e find 
 ourselves in this condition, the proper course to be pursued 
 is to refer back to the premises from which we proceed, and 
 deter '. jne whether they be the same. When men agree in 
 premises, and reason logically from them, it cannot be long 
 before some conclusion is reached. 
 
 But it is evident that in all matters of science, and, in 
 fact, in all our reasonings (those only excepted which aro 
 technically termed ad hormieni)^ we address ourselves not to 
 one man. or one class of men, but to the whole human race 
 
riRST TKUTDS. 
 
 Zoo 
 
 We proceed upon the belief that what connnces r.\,c man, 
 of fair undcrstandiiis; aid in a normal condition of the intel- 
 lect, will convince all men under the same circumstances 
 that is. that there are common truths which all men admit, 
 and that, reasoning from them, they must all arrive at the 
 same result as soon as the argument is fairly presented 
 And this anticipation is justified by universal experience. 
 The conclusions of mathematics, astronomy, mechanics, of 
 geol )gy, chemistry, magnetism, of political economy, and 
 social philosopliy, from the time of their first promulgation, 
 have established themselves gradually in the mind of man, 
 until, by the force of tlieir own evidence, they are admitted 
 as acknowledged truths. Every man who has been con- 
 vinced of the truth of the reasoning on which their con- 
 clusions depend, feels assured that every other man who 
 contemplates them without prejudice will be convinced also. 
 Hence the universal confidence that is felt in the maxim of 
 Bacon, ^'^ Magna est Veritas et prevalent^ Such unani- 
 mous consent to conclusions could not be predicted, and 
 could not exist, unless there were principles lying at the 
 foundation of the reasonings, which all men admit, and from 
 which conclusions follow, by irresistible sequence, which all 
 men must allow. Such truths, made known to all men by 
 the original constitution of the human understanding, must 
 lie at the foundation of all science, and of all knowledge 
 established by reasoning. They have le^en called, by Buffier 
 and Dr. Reid, first truths, and they are said by tho.-^e phi- 
 losophers to emanate from the common sense of mank:nd. 
 
 It may reasonably be demanded whether there is any 
 ikicde by which we may determine whether or not any 
 proposition is a first truth. Is th«^re any test by which 
 they may be practically distinguished from mere propo8itioni 
 lliat are inferred from them ? To this I answer. 
 
 First, they are in* tmjucheiisibh. 
 
Z8S INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Seconvlljr, they are simple. 
 
 Thirdly, theij are necessary and iniicersal 
 
 Fourthly, fJiey are so evident that nothing jnore et'i. 
 ie7it can he discovered by which to prove thdm. 
 
 This subject has, however, been already considered undei 
 the head of the Reality of our Knowledge, pages 95 — 97, 
 to which pages the reader is referred. 
 
 The axioms of geometry are acknowledged to be the foun- 
 dation truths of that science ; but other self-evident truths 
 he equally at the foundation of aii other knowledge estab- 
 lished by reasoning. For instance : that I exist ; that an 
 external universe exists; that the testimony of my percep- 
 tive and my reasoning powers is to be received ; that a 
 change presupposes a cause ; that the course of nature is 
 uniform, or that the same causes under the same conditions 
 will produce the same effects ; that rational beings act from 
 motives, and that a change of action must proceed from a 
 change of motives, and a multitude of others, may be placed 
 m the number of first truths. 
 
 Between the truths that are acknowledged by all as self- 
 evident, as I have before remarked, a distinction may be 
 observed. The first truths of geometry, for instance, are 
 perceived to be such unconditionally. Thus, we could not 
 conceive of any circumstances in which the whole of any- 
 thing would not be greater than its part, the reverse of this 
 truth being manifestly untliinkable. This, as we perceive, 
 must be true semper et ubique. But that I exist, that an 
 external world exists, is only a conditional first truth. 
 Neither 1 nor the external world have always existed, and 
 ;t is not impossible to suppose them to cease to exist. It ia 
 not, however, possible to conceive them not to exist, things 
 bei/ta- as they are ; that is, I being conscious of the acta 
 af thinking, perceiving, etc. Thus also, things being as 
 they are, it is impossible to conceive of an intelligent being 
 
FIRST TRUTHS. 28? 
 
 i« acting iritbout motive, but it is not impossible t5 supposa 
 beings constituted so differently from us as to act in this 
 manner, or to suppose tliat no intelligent beings had ever 
 been created. But, things being as they are, the opposite 
 of these truths is utterly inconceivable. 
 
 On tiiese first truths all our reasonings ultimately depend. 
 Thry are rarely stated in language, because every man 
 instinctively takes them for granted, and he knows that all 
 other men do the same. It would, however, be a very valu- 
 able service to science, if the first truths of all knowledge 
 in general, and of the separate sciences in particular, could 
 be plainly stated and accurately classified. In this manner 
 a large amount of useless discussion would be prevented, 
 and truth arrived at with much greater facility. Dr. Reid, 
 in the sixth chapter of his sixth Essay on the intellectual 
 puwers, has stated several of the necessary truths in gram- 
 mar, logic, mathematics, in taste, in morals and meta- 
 physics, together with many contingent truths which are 
 admitted in all our efforts after knowledge. The subject, 
 however, demands a more extended and minute examination. 
 Whenever it shall have been done, the labor of intellectual 
 research will be greatly diminished, and its results mure 
 easily verified. 
 
 2. I have stated above that the end to be accomplished 
 by the reasoning faculty is to render the conclusion at which 
 we arrive, of precisely the same validity as the premises 
 From this it is evident that whatever the reasoning faculty 
 has logically deduced from first truths is just as valid mat- 
 tor fiom which to proceed as the first truths themselves 
 Th;is. in geometry, from the axioms and definitions we prove 
 a proposition ; that proposition, when logically proved, is aa 
 certainly true as the axioms from which wo at first pro- 
 ceeded. The proposition that the angles at the base of aa 
 lso9<-.eJ3S triangle are equal, is just as valid a premise, ia i 
 
288 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 geometrical demonstration, as the truth that thinj^s e(|ual to 
 the same are equal to one another. And, still further, what- 
 ever is b_y logical process pnoved from this proposition i8 
 iust as valid matter as the proposition itself. And this will 
 be the case to any extent whatever. 
 
 ^'he only abatement to be made to this statement is the 
 ancertain*:v arising from the imperfection of our faculties 
 W3 may, froia this imperfection, reason illogically Avithout 
 perceiving it. If there be this lia;bility, the greater the 
 number of arguments, the greater the probability that in 
 Bome one there will be error. And this liability jncreasea 
 with the complication of the relations which we are called 
 to consider. Tliis liability is reduced to the smallest prac- 
 tical value when the various steps of au argument have 
 been examined by men skilled in the discovery of truth, 
 and their validity has been allowed by all succeeding phi- 
 losophers. 
 
 3. Besides these truths given us in the original constitu- 
 tion of our intellect, and the trutlis following from them 
 by logical deduction, other truths are valid matter in our 
 reasonings. Such are the acknowledged laws of nature, 
 established by incontestable observation. Thus, it has been 
 ascertained th;it the sensation of hearing, under normal con- 
 ditions, is caused by tlie vibration of the air; the perception 
 of external objects, by the formation of an image on the 
 retina; that water boils at 212° and freezes at 32° Fahren- 
 heit, under ordinary conditions of barometrical pressure; 
 that the atmosphere is a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen 
 j/ases. and water a compound of oxygen and hydrogen, both 
 always i'H definite proportions ; that atmospheric air is neces- 
 sary to animal life. These, and all other laws and general 
 facts, which at any time have been discovered by experiment 
 or ob.servation. whether in matter or mind, are valid matter 
 from which to proceed in our reasonings. We thus see the 
 
FIRST TRrXHS. 289 
 
 connection between those powers of the loind which we have 
 previously considered and the reasoning faculty. The former 
 observe and retain and generalize, and thus change individ- 
 ual facts into general laws. These become the premises 
 from which, by our reasoning power, conclusions are drawn ; 
 and thus knowledge is increased, and the dominion of man 
 over nature extended. 
 
 4. I have thus far treated of premises, or propositions 
 fioni which we proceed in reasoning, of which the truth is 
 incontestable. Wherever such propositions can be discovered 
 we always are bound to use them, for thus alone can we 
 arrive at pure truth, and enlarge our positive knowledge. 
 Frequently, however, in our practical conduct, such propo- 
 sitions cannot be discovered, and we are obliged to form 
 our reasonings on mere probability. In this case we can 
 arrive at nothing higher than probability, but this proba- 
 bility is in many cases far preferable to ignorance, and may 
 furnish a valuaMe guide for our conduct. Thus, we say, 
 concerning a coming event, men under certain circumstances 
 generally act thus or so. A, is under these circumstances, 
 therefore he will probably act thus or so. Under such or 
 such conditions of the atmosphere it generally rains ; such 
 are the conditions this morning, therefore it will probably 
 rain to-day. Or, again : if there be a war in Europe, there 
 will be a demand for American grain : there will probably 
 be a war in Europe, therefore probably there will be such 
 a demand. It is obvious that much of our reasoning con- 
 cerning future events is of this character. It does not 
 furnish us with certain knowledge, but yet with knowledge 
 which may be of great value in the practical business of 
 life, and the management of affairs. 
 
 n. Such are some of the truths from which we proceed 
 in the use of our reasoning powers. I proceed to inquire, 
 secondly, what is the state of mind at which we arrive 
 25 
 
290 INTEL-,ECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 provided the reasoning faculty has been employed in cuedi 
 once to the laws to which it has been subjected. 
 
 The states of mind of which we may be conscious in regard 
 to any proposition, are, I think, the following : 
 
 1. We may be in perfect ignorance concerning it, neither 
 believing nor disbelieving it in the slightest degree. Thus, 
 were it aSBrmed that the sun is inhabited, I must say, I 
 know nothing about it. I have no facts from which to 
 reason, and am therefore in absolute ignorance ; I have not 
 even an opinion either in favor of, or in opposition to, the 
 proposition. It is to me precisely the same as if the affirm- 
 ation had not been made. 
 
 2. I may know that a proposition is true. Here I 
 express my state of mind by saying that I believe it, or I 
 know it. Thus, I know that the exterior angle of a triangle 
 18 equal to the two interior and opposite angles. I believe 
 that there are such cities as London, Paris, and Wash- 
 ington. 
 
 3. I may know a proposition to be false. Here my state 
 of mind is expressed by the words, I disbelieve it. Thus, if 
 the proposition were presented to me, that the angles at the 
 base of an isosceles triangle are unequal, I know it to be 
 false, and I say I disbelieve it. 
 
 4. Without being able to arrive at either belief or disbe- 
 lief, I am capable of forming an opinion concerning the 
 truth or falsehood of a proposition. I weigh the several con- 
 siderations presented, and I find my mind inclined in one 
 direction or the other ; though I am fully aware that this 
 inclination may be reversed by subsequent and more accu 
 rate knowledge. Thus, in the present state of knowledge, 
 I am unable either to believe or disbelieve that the planets 
 are inhabited, yet 1 may have an opinion on tie subject in- 
 elining ei».her to the oni^ view or the other. I therefora 
 
PROPOSITIONS. 293 
 
 wait for further information, prepared to change my opinion 
 with the progress of knowledge. 
 
 The object of reasoning is to advance our certainty, and 
 to move the mind onward from the extreme of ignorance on 
 the one hand, to the opposite extreme of belief on the other. 
 Hence it maj change our mental state from ignorance to 
 opinion, from opinion to more confident opinion, or from 
 either of these to certainty or confident belief Its move- 
 ment is all in one direction, from a lower to a higher degree 
 of cert^iinty. 
 
 From what has been said, it is evident that, when our 
 premises are indubitable, we arrive, by reasoning, at absolute 
 belief or indubitable truth. "\Mien our premises are merely 
 matters of opinion we arrive only at opinion. In every 
 case we raise the conclusion to precisely the same degree of 
 certainty as the premises from which we proceed ; we make 
 what was before unknown, or less known, exactly equal to 
 what was before more known. Our conclusion can never 
 be more certain than our premises, but if our process be 
 logical, it can never be less certain. 
 
 III. We now come, in the third place, to inquire what is 
 the process by which this relation between the known and 
 the unknown is rendered apparent, so that we are enabled 
 to raise the one to the certainty of the other. 
 
 We do this by syllogism. A syllogism is a series of 
 judgments or propositions, the last of which affirms the con- 
 clusion at which we have arrived. Before considering syllo- 
 gisms, it will be proper to consider the nature of judgments, 
 or the propositions of which they are composed. 
 
 Judgment is an act of the mind in which we affirm onf 
 thing of another ; that is, we affirm a predicate of a subject, 
 or judge that a particular individual or species is included 
 it a particular genus or class. Thus, I judge snow to b 
 white, grass to be green, avarice to be cuntemptil)le ; tha. 
 
2i»2 TmELLECTUAL PHILOSOrHY. 
 
 is, I jadge these particular individuals to be comprenendod 
 within the class which I predicate of them. 
 
 Our judgment may be either clear and distinct, or obscure 
 and confused. 
 
 A judgment is formed from two conceptions, and it 
 affirms that one of these may be predicated of the other. 
 Now, if we have a complete comprehension of both these 
 conceptions, our judgment must be clear and distinct. On 
 the other hand, if my knowledge of the conceptions involved 
 be imperfect, vague, and obscure, my judgment must be of 
 a similar character. Thus, when the proposition is an- 
 nounced that the three angles of a triangle are equal to two 
 right angles, I comprehend the terms employed both in the 
 subject and predicate, and my judgment is definite and un- 
 ambiguous. If it be said that the rings of Saturn are chaos, 
 I find myself to have a very incomplete idea of the rings of 
 Saturn, and a very indistinct idea of chaos. Hence. I am 
 unable to form anything more than a very indistinct idea of 
 the proposition. 
 
 It is hardly necessary to remark that judgment enters aa 
 an element into almost all our mental acts. We think in 
 judgments ; that is, we are always affirming one thing of 
 another, and we do not consider anything else to be thinking. 
 To conceive of things without forming judgments, is to make 
 no progress. Wo can only be said to think when we form 
 a judgment, respecting two conceptions, in which one is 
 affirmed of the otlier. 
 
 The expression of a judgment in words, is called a propo- 
 sition. A proposition, therefore, must consist of a subject, 
 or that of which we affirm, a predicate, or that which we 
 ftffiim of it, and a copula, or that which affirms the relation 
 existing between them. Thus, if I say, man is a vertebrate, 
 here tn^m is the subject, vertebrate is the predicatt. and ii 
 vs the copula, or that which affirms the one of the other 
 
PROPOSITIOXS. 298 
 
 The subject is tliat of which we discourse, the predicate ifl 
 the Class to wLicb we affirm that it belongs, or under which 
 it is comprehended, and the copula is that which affirms the 
 eristence of this relation. 
 
 When we thus affirm a predicate of a subject, we affirm that 
 all the qualities of the predicate are possessed by the sulject. 
 When I saj, man is a vertebrate, I affirm that all which is com- 
 prehended by the predicate vertebrate is possessed by man. 
 
 In every proposition it is obvious there must be two 
 conceptions. Of these one must be a general idea, or one 
 designating a class. To affirm of two individuals is either 
 nugatory or false. • To say John is John is nugatory, for 
 the proposition does not advance our knowledge. To say 
 John is Peter is false, for it affirms something to be difterent 
 from what it is. 
 
 The subject may be either an individual or a species ; tbo 
 predicate must be a genus ; that is, it must designate a larger 
 class than the subject. In a proposition, we therefore affirm 
 that a particular individual is included within a particular 
 class. Hence, every proposition must be either true or false. 
 The subject is either included within the class designated by 
 the predicate, or it is not. It cannot be neither within noi 
 without it. Thus, if I say horse is a vertebrate, it is eithei 
 true or false^ for horse is either included within this class, 
 or it is not. 
 
 We may now proceed to the subject of syllogism. 
 
 A syllogism, in the language of Aristotle, is a speech ia 
 which certain things (the premises) being supposed, some- 
 thing different from what is supposed (the ionclusion) 
 follows of necessity, and this solely in virtue of he suppo- 
 sitions themselves. 
 
 The principle on which a syllogism depends is the follow- 
 ing : Whatever is affirmed or denied of a class is affirmed 
 V denied of every individual under that class. Thus, when 
 25* 
 
S94 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHT. 
 
 I say snow is white, I mean that snow is compn tended un- 
 der the class Avhite, and I affirm this also of all snow what- 
 ever. When I say snow is not black, I exclude snow from 
 the class black, and I exclude all snow from this class ; that 
 is, I deny black of snow. 
 
 It will be seen, from what has been said, that logic, or the 
 science of syllogisms, is formal ; that is, it must proceed 
 from premises conceded. It of itself takes no cognizance 
 of either their truth or falsehood. Supposing them to 
 be true, it governs the forms of propositions, and their rela- 
 tions to each other, and merely assures us that the conclu- 
 sion which we infer in obedience to its rules is as true as our 
 premises. It renders us no other aid than this, but this it 
 renders most effectually. 
 
 It has sometimes been supposed that syllogism was % 
 mode of reasoning, and a mode of reasoning employed by 
 philosophers, while other men reasoned in some other and 
 simpler manner. It has even been said, that, much as philos- 
 ophers talk about syllogism, when they come to reason, 
 they neglect it all, and reason like common men. To this 
 it may be replied, that syllogism is not a mode, it is the 
 mode of reasoning. It is the peculiar process of the reason- 
 ing faculty. The reasoning power forms syllogisms just aa 
 the imagination forms pictures, each being the purpose for 
 which these different powers were respectively designed 
 Philosophers and other men must, therefore, if they reason 
 at all, reason in the same way, for they have no other 
 nethod by which to proceed. I do not, of course, pretend 
 that either of them draws out every argument in the form 
 t?f a syllogism. One or both of the premises are frequently 
 w well known as to be taken for granted, and we need only 
 Btate the conclusion which must follow from what is con- 
 ceded by all. But, in tils case, our reasoning, though evei 
 lu muih abridged, may always be reduced to the fo*-m of a 
 
SYLLOGISM. 295 
 
 fyfioglain, and we always so reduce it^ if we desire to test 
 its truth and examine it with accuracy. 
 
 In forming a syllogism in the first proposition we affirm 
 thit a species is included under a genus. By the second 
 proposition we affirm that an individual or a sub-species ii 
 included under this species. In the third proposition, or the 
 conclusion, we affirm the proposition which, of necessity, 
 follows from the conjunction of the two first propositions at 
 premises. 
 
 Thus, for example, I affirm, 
 
 1. All tyrants are detestable. 
 
 2. Caesar was a tyrant. 
 
 3. Caesar was detestable 
 
 Here, by the first proposition, I affirm that the speciea 
 tyrant is included under the genus detestable ; by the 
 BeCv^nd proposition, I affirm that the individual Caesar was 
 inclaufid under the species tyrant ; and, by the third propo- 
 sition, I affirm the conclusion which of necessity follows, 
 namely, that Caesar is included under the class detestable. 
 
 In order to illustrate this subject, let us suppose that the 
 proposition to be proved is, Caesar was detestable. The 
 predicate is called the major term, the subject the minor 
 term. "Wlien we make this assertion, it is denied by an op- 
 ponent ; that is, he asserts, on the contrary, that this predi- 
 cate, detestable, cannot be affirmed of the subject, Caesar, 
 In what manner is it given us to proceed? Assertion ia 
 confronted by assertion equally decided. In what manner 
 shall we arrive at the truth, so as to convince an opponent 
 or mankind in general, of the validity of our proposition? 
 
 Wc do this by seeking for what is called a middle term, 
 or for some class which is included in the class detestable, 
 and whicli aliO includes the subject 'Caesar. Suppose 1 
 •hoose the term dictator, and say, 
 
 1. All dictators are detestable 
 
SDii I.MELLECrUAL PHILOSUPUI 
 
 2. Caesar was a dictator. 
 
 6. Caesar was detestable. 
 
 My opponent refers to Fabius, and other dictators, who 
 were not detestable. I am, therefore, obligei to change 
 the first premise, and saj, some dictators are detestable. But; 
 as all dictators are not included in the class detestable, tha 
 conclusion will not by necessity follow, and this argument 
 must be relinquished. 
 
 I seek for another middle term, and select that mentioned 
 above, the term tyrant. I show by facts that Caesar wua 
 comprehended under this class. I then proceed as before, 
 and the conclusion follows by necessity, in virtue of the 
 suppositions themselves. 
 
 The above is an affirmative sj'llogism. In a negativt 
 syllogism the process is modified as follows : We first 
 affirm that a certain species is wholly excluded from a par- 
 ticular genus. In the second place, we affirm that the in- 
 dividual or sub-species is included in this excluded species. 
 The conclusion follows,. by necessity, that the individual or 
 species is excluded from the first mentioned genus. 
 
 For example, suppose it were to be proved that Caesa* 
 •was not detestable. This is denied, and we must seek for a 
 middle term which shall include Caesar, and be excluded 
 from the class detestable. I choose the <^^erm dictator, aiid 
 then say, 
 
 1. No dictator is detestable. 
 
 2. Caesar was a dictator ; therefore^ 
 
 3. Caesar was not detestable. 
 
 Here, however, I am met by the fact that some dictator! 
 were detestable, and for this reason my argument faila, 
 since some dictators are not excluded from this class. 
 
 I must, therefore, select another middle term. I saj 
 therefore 
 
 1 Nc brave and generous man is detestable. 
 
SYLLOGISM. 2b » 
 
 2. Casar was a brave and generous man. 
 
 3. Caesar was not detestable. 
 
 If these premises are granted, the conclusion, as before, 
 follows by necessity. If any of our premises is denied, W9 
 are obliged to form a syllogism in the same manner, and 
 prove our premise before we can proceed. But, having es- 
 tablished the premises, the conclusion cannot be evaded. 
 
 The above instances will illustrate the general nature of 
 syllogisms. Sophisms are arguments purporting to be syl- 
 logisms, in whic;h the essential laws of syllogism are vio- 
 lated. Thus, 
 
 1. All quadrupeds are animals. 
 
 2. Birds are animals ; therefore, 
 
 3. Birds are quadrupeds. 
 
 Here it is seen at once that the class quadrupeds, which 
 is included in animals, does not include birds. Therefore, 
 nothing is concluded. So again, 
 
 1. Black is a color. 
 
 2. White is a color; therefore, 
 
 3. AVhite is black. 
 
 Here, as before, both white and black are included in the 
 same genus, but there is no species included in the class 
 color, which also includes the subject of the conclusion. 
 
 I have thought that this subject might be illustrated by a 
 few simple diagrams. I, therefore, add them in this place, 
 for the sake of representing the doctrine of syllogism to the 
 eye. To those learned in logic, they will, I know, bfl 
 deemed superfluous ; but, as this work is designed for those 
 who are entering upon this study, they may not be wholly 
 without advantage. 
 
 The affirmative syllogism may be represented by the fol 
 Icwiiig diagram. For instance, 
 
 All vertebrates are animals. 
 
 Horse is a vertebrate ; therefore. 
 
208 fNTELLECTUAl PHILOSOPHY 
 
 Horse is an animal. 
 
 s 
 
 
 eS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 
 K 
 
 V 
 
 [ 
 
 That is, vertebrate is included in animal, horse is included 
 ■« vertebrate ; therefore, hoi-se is included in animal. 
 Take, again, a negative syllogism ; for instance, 
 No predaceous animals are ruminant. 
 Lion is a predaceous animal ; therefor©, 
 Lion is not ruminant. 
 This may be represented by the following diagram : 
 
 f 
 
 That is, predaceous is excluded from ruminant, and lio« 
 is included in predaceous ; therefore, lion is excluded from 
 ru:nir.ant. 
 
 This is the regular form of syllogism The nature of 
 Bophisms or false syllogisms may he illustrated by 8*«iilai 
 diagrams. For instance, 
 
SYLLOGISM. 
 
 299 
 
 All quaflrupeds are animala. 
 Birds fire animah ; therefore, 
 Birds are quadrupeds. 
 
 That is, quadrupeds are included it animals ; birds are 
 uicluded in animals, but are not included in quadrupeds ; 
 therefore, nothing is concluded Again, 
 
 Food is necessary to life. 
 
 Corn is food ; therefore, 
 
 Corn is necessary to life. 
 
 That is, necessary to life includes some food. Sut not oU 
 
sot; ^yrn.T.BcrcAi prnxosopHT 
 
 food mdades com hut. as neccaBarv to life does not indnde 
 all food, so com i< not of necessnr included in necessarr to 
 life- So. apun 
 
 Bla<^ is a color. 
 
 Wiiite is a color ; iherefare. 
 
 Bbit^ is irhite. 
 
 i 
 
 Here cdor includes black and alao includes wiiite. Both | 
 
 »e coiors. bni •we see at a glance that nothing is conciuded. 
 
 In tLs manner we mav represent various forms of svl- 
 logians and «opLisnis. Tt»e a hove examples will, however. 
 Bnffieientlr iEusiraXe the nature of both. 
 
 In some cases we are able to discover a middle term which 
 is miiiitiveiv true and fulfils all die conditions of proof 
 Here OUT course i= plain. But suppose we are unable to do 
 this, wiiat course remains for us ? We art then obliired to 
 jonsmct a eoii>ecniral srllogism. which wiH prove our 
 proposidon. provided we can show its premises to be true. 
 Ws then take the conjectELrcil premise, and construct a btIIo- 
 sism bv wl eh it can be proved. If here one of our prem- 
 HCE £ (*oi._iectnTa] we construct another svDogism. niitil 
 •e kave arx.^ved at -ime proyiosiiioii which we are able to 
 fiwe- In ^lig majiTiPT the premise in gu^cion is estab- 
 lait^L Wboi both the '■'•jg™*^ |remide& are proved, tb« 
 
«■& is immt, wad i^ crigtMil mmjli'/.ii d ^fJk^iaai im 
 ^■i^ 1» te tT«ie. Or. on 1^ adusT laml. il KZieitusiBg id 
 m»wi MEfaer cf OBT jffeauBes. i^e find Ac iB wwbniTi i cK^due^ 
 E i^as IB ke &iJBe. ve ataTwikin is aJH^^a^ter. and ee^ vm 
 mests aihet me&t of prooL 
 
 ^JB pnoesE maT. I ^iici. be lansrased br ine jffOfw 
 Sfekkm aaamsmHj Eoaywn »£■ d^ 4Tiil of ^ £is: bouk 
 of E.nefid's efemeum. or "dias TTiiet urc^^s ibax in set 
 rL^t-gprlt^ trbngk, lae soqxr af ihe side sul Tr^T Himg ii*e 
 IS eqi;tal ic dike sum of lae s^xukias ac tbe sidss 
 - _ _ie ri^is a-npj W I pEcsmie everv reader ud de 
 fa.n-'.a.r ^nui ^ propOftTn<Hi- Bad. dkBTefiore. I oeed onhr 
 BKJitay briecv Uke luassraziaB -vkk^ I it&ve xd o&s. 
 
 The -proNiBrocai to be TcvT=ed s tb»: t:-, ? u;_~t^ ^ -r.r. i 
 
 HtMTp I can &id ik» middk ^Ym af aciiioiclsisl::tv :-:::r 
 wr Vfeich tp jat«r? th.is i^raposKicax. I jvrocs»ed, iiu^ --./--., 
 •Ad ccatsirucx «& arsrvmeau "Kkicii icill |fft>«e i: jiarovidtfc xk 
 pns25ii?es can be skvwa to be r-ne. Haxmr: d:vjds?fl ^ 
 liTijss: s^^UJk^e. x, imo tw* paxts^ bv xbe Ime 6., 7, 1 stx, 
 :3i 
 
802 lyiELLECTUAL PIxIL'.- SOPHY. 
 
 Things equal to the same are equal to each other. 
 
 The square x. and the sum of the squares a and b. ai« 
 equal to the parallelograms a' and h' . 
 
 Therefore, the &quare x is equal to the sum of the Sijuarca 
 a and h. 
 
 Now this syllogism will prove the proposition if I can 
 bLow the premises to be true. But it is not proved that the 
 Bc^uares a and h are respectively equal to the parallelogiuma 
 d and h' . This is, in the next place, to be proved. 
 
 I saj. then, again, 
 
 The doubles of equals are equal. 
 
 The parallelogram a and the square a are each double 
 of the equal triangles. 1, 2. 3, and G. 2. 5. 
 
 Therefore, the parallelogram a and the square a are 
 equal. 
 
 But it is yet to be proved that these two triangles are 
 equal. This has been taken for granted. 
 
 I proceed again. 
 
 Triangles having two sides equal, and the angle contained 
 by these two sides equal, are themselves equal. 
 
 These triangles have these sides and angles equal ; 
 
 Therefore, these two triangles are equal. 
 
 The equality of the triangles proves the square and 
 parallelogram to be equal, and thus my conjectural syllo- 
 gism is proved to be true. 
 
 The conjectural syllogism with which I commenced, 
 proved the proposition, provr'led its premises could bo 
 proved- I have proved the premises, and, therefore, the 
 pioposition is proved. 
 
 But, having discovered tbs truth, suppose I wish to com- 
 Diunicate it to another. I then reverse the process, and 
 pommence with the projiosition with which I just low con- 
 cluded. 
 
 I first show that the triangles are equal , 
 
BEASONINa. 803 
 
 Then, that a rectangle and a triangle bolng on the same 
 base and between the same parallels, the rectangle is doable 
 of the triangle ; 
 
 Hence, tlie triangles being equal, the rectangle and the 
 square must be equivalent. 
 
 And, hence, the t^YO smaller squares and the greater 
 square being both equal to the two parallelograms, the two 
 smaller, and the greater square are equal to each other. 
 
 In this instance the example is taken from the mathe- 
 matics. But the case is essentially the same in all cases 
 where we attempt to prove a proposition. We first con- 
 struct a syllogism, which, if true, will prove it. But one 
 or both the premises may be doubtful. We take the doubt- 
 ful premise and form a syllogism, which, if true, will prove 
 it. If, here, one of our premises is conjectural, we make a 
 third proposition, which, in like manner, we attempt to prove, 
 until we arrive at some acknowledged truth from which it 
 proceeds. We then construct our argument, beginning with 
 the fundamental truth at which avc last arrived, and proceed 
 outwards, reversing our process, until we show that our orig- 
 inal proposition depends upon truth which all must ac- 
 knowledge. 
 
 Thus, when one of our premises is denied, we must prove 
 our premise. If the premise of this proof is denied, we 
 must prove this premise. Going backward, in this manner, 
 we at last arrive at first truths, or those which every mind, 
 in a normal condition, perceives by intuition to be true. 
 Thus in the proposition just taken for an example, if our 
 premises were continually denied, we should at last arrive 
 at the definitions and axioms of geometry. And thus, in any 
 ©ther reasoning, we arrive, by the same process, at truths 
 Bfjually obvious to a sound understanding. When we hava 
 wrived at these, reason can go no further. If these are 
 denied, the party denying must be wanting in ordinary 
 
b04 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 mtellect, or we must have taken as true what is obviuusiy 
 (alse. Whichever be the case, there is an end of argument. 
 
 We hear it frequently said that all mathematical reason- 
 ing depends upon definitions and axioms. This is true ; but 
 their importance depends upon different principles. It may 
 be well to consider briefly the nature of each. 
 
 A definition is a conception expressed in language. 
 Thus, if I am about to prove to another ptrson a proposi- 
 tion in which I use the conception of lines, angles, trian- 
 gles, s(iuares and circles, it is evident that my argument 
 will be useless to him, unless, when I use these words, he 
 have the same conceptions as myself If, when I say 
 " line," he has the same conception that I have when I say 
 "triangle," we could never understand each other. It ia 
 necessary, therefore, that I explain, as clearly as possible, 
 the conception which I form when I use these terms. Hav- 
 ing done this, and it being certain that we have the same 
 conception when we use the same words, we are prepared 
 to proceed in our argument. 
 
 An axiom e.xpresses an intuitively perceived relation be- 
 tween our conceptions. Thus, having defined what we mean 
 by Lines, angles, and other elements of quantity, we say 
 " Two straight lines cannot enclose space." '• Things equal 
 to the same are equal to one another." These relations 
 being conceded by both parties, and the same conceptions 
 being common to both, we have the elements necessary for 
 reasoning. 
 
 When it is said, therefore, that we cannot reason without 
 definitions and axioms, the impossibility arises from differ- 
 ent causes. We cannot reason without definitions, because 
 we cannot reason together unless the terras wh^ch we em- 
 ploy create in the minds of each other the same conceptions. 
 But this cannot be known unless the terras which we usfl 
 we adequately explained: that is, uule.s.-i »hey are defined 
 
AXIOMS AND DEFINITIONS. 306 
 
 The icason for the necessity of axioms is diffeient. Wfl 
 must agree as to the laws to which these conceptions are 
 Buhjccted. or else we can never arrive at a common conclu- 
 sion. If I show that what I assert is true, for otherwise 
 two straight lines must enclose space, or that the who'e be 
 less than its part, 1 can proceed no further. But, if mj 
 opponent does not admit these axioms or laws of quantity to 
 be true, he will never feel the force of mj reasoning, and 
 will, of course, not be convinced. 
 
 This is manifestly true in the mathematics. But it is 
 obvious that the same principles must govern all our rea- 
 sonings. Unless men attach the same meaning to the samo 
 term, that is, unless a term awakens in each the same con- 
 ception, they can no more reason together than they could 
 if each spoke a language unknown to the other. In ordi- 
 nary discourse, the meaning of terms is sufficiently estab- 
 lished by usage to prevent any serious difficulty. It is found, 
 however, neces&xry, when accuracy of reasoning is attempted, 
 to proceed further, and define our terms with the greatest 
 precision. Were this more frequently done, much valuable 
 labor would be saved, and differences of opinion among hon- 
 est men would be found less important than they seem to be. 
 And so of axioms. Unless the relations which exist between 
 these conceptions are admitted, men may reason together 
 forever without coming to any conclusion. Thus, were two 
 men arguing together on the nature of human rights, they 
 might define 7na?i as accurately as they pleased, but, unless 
 they agreed upon the relation which man sustains to infli- 
 vidual man and to society, they could never come to any con- 
 clusion. Neither would be pressed by the arguments of 
 the other, and what seemed to the one perfectly conclusive, 
 would to the other seem destitute of all show of reason. It 
 is to be regretted that much of our reasoning is apt to be of 
 this character 
 
 26* 
 
806 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 The T»hole subject of syllogisms, their nature and claasi- 
 fication, the rules to which they are subjected, and the dis- 
 tinction between true and false syllogisms, is treated of in 
 the science of logic. To these the reader is referred for a 
 further development of the doctrines here briefly alluded 
 to. I ask leave to commend this study to all persons who 
 ttiin at the attainment of mental acuteness, and the thorough 
 cultivation of their reasoning power. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Reasoning, its nature — Reid, Essay 7, chap. 1. 
 
 Reasoning, instinctive — Reid, Essay 7, chap. 1, 
 
 Reasoning rests on first truths — Reid, Essay 1, chap. 2; Essay 6, 
 ehap. 2. 
 
 This denied — Locke, Book 4, chap. 2, sees. 7, 8 ; chap. 7, sees. 8, 10; 
 19, -10. 
 
 Cousin's Review of Locke — chap. 9. 
 
 Buffier, first truths. 
 
 Test of first trutlis — Reid, Essay 6, chap. 4. 
 
 Classilijalion of first truths — Reid, Essay 1, cliap. 2 ; Essay 6, chap* 
 6 6. 
 
 Judgment, its nature — Reid, Essay 6, chap. 1. 
 
 Judgment distinguished from testimony and conceptions — Reid, Essa;f 
 'i, chap. 1. 
 
 Judgments necessary and contingent — Reid, Essay 6, chap. 1. 
 
 Common Sense, Reid, Essay 6, chap. 2. 
 
 Syllogism not the great instrument of reasoning — Locke, Book 4, 
 chap. 17, sees. 4 — 7 ; Cousin, chap. 9. 
 
 Aristotle's logic examined — Stewait, vol. ii., chap. 3, sec. 1. 
 
 Eftects of study of logic on intellectual habits — Stewart, vol. il, eh«p 
 f , sec. 2. 
 
 Vae of dcfin.'tions — Stewart, vol. ii., chap. 2, sec. .3. 
 
 Nugatory propositions — Locke, Book 4, chap. 8, sec. 4. 
 
 Pi.>po8itians true cr false — Locke, Book 2, chap. 32 ae^*. 1^-4. 
 
KINDS OF CEUTAISTY. 301 
 
 BKCTIOy II.— 3F THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF CERIAINTT AT 
 WHICH WE ARRIVE BY REASONING. 
 
 I HAVE remarked that by the process of reasoning, if 
 p.operly conducted, we always render the conclusion a& 
 certain as the preuiises. This is the sole object of syllo- 
 gism, and this it invariably accomplishes. I have also 
 Dbserved that our conclusions may be either certain, or only 
 probable, according to the nature of the premises from 
 which they proceed. 
 
 Dismissing the consideration of the cases in which we 
 establish probability, and confining our attention to that in 
 which we arrive at certainty, we perceive that this certainty 
 is of two kinds. We may arrive, first, at metaphysical or 
 absolute, or, secondly, at practical certainty. Let us attempt 
 to distinguish these from each other, and show the pecu- 
 liarities of each. 
 
 I. Of aietajthysical and absohite certainty. 
 
 When we arrive at this kind of certainty, the matter of 
 our reasoning is wholly conceptions, or the notions T?hich 
 we form in our own minds, representing no actual reality. 
 Those are, of course, precisely what we make them, neither 
 greater nor less, nor in any possible respect different from 
 our thoughts ; for they are our thoughts themselves, and 
 nothing else. Hence, when they are distinctly compre- 
 hend jd, and formed into syllogism according to the rules of 
 logic, they must lead to a conception of the same character 
 as the premises, and be inevitably as true. There is no lia- 
 bility for misconception or ambiguity. The result must be 
 •IS true as our thoughts themselves 
 
 The most remarkable exanple of this mode of reasoning 
 is found in the pure mathematics. Here the matter about 
 which we reason is pure ccnceptions. We demonstrate truth 
 
808 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 about liies, angles, triangles, circles, etc., not as actual ex- 
 istences but merely as conceptions. By our definitions, we 
 announce distinctly the ideas intended by the terms which 
 ■we employ. These ideas we continue to use without change 
 throughout our reasonings, and the results at which we 
 arrive are concerning these alone. 
 
 I have said that in this mode of reasoning we have noth- 
 ing to do with actual existences. This is evident from the 
 fact that the pure mathematics might have been carried to 
 any conceivable degree of perfection, had a material uni- 
 verse never been created. All that is required for thig 
 mode of reasoning is a thinking mind. Hence we never, 
 in geometry, attempt to prove anything respecting an exist- 
 ing figure. We may use a diagram for the sake of concen- 
 trating our attention, but our reasoning is not concerning it, 
 or any other thing visible or tangible. No actual figure 
 exactly corresponds with our definitions, and, if it did, we 
 have no fliculties by which to ascertain the correspondence. 
 We say the angles at the base of an isosceles triangle are 
 equal. This Ave show to be unconditionally true. But it is 
 true of our conceptions only, and not of the diagram on the 
 blackboard. We do not know that the lines of that triangle 
 are perfectly straight, or the sides equal; nay, we know 
 that it is beyond our power to make them so. But this in 
 no manner aSects our demonstration. If any one should 
 attempt to convict us of error, by measuring the triangle 
 and showing that cne angle was greater than the other, we 
 should smile at his ignorance. We know that our proposi- 
 tion is tru'=> concerning the conception existing in our minds, 
 and this is all we ever attempted to prove. 
 
 I have said that the most striking example of this species 
 of reasoning is observed in the case of the pure mathe- 
 matics. I know of no reason, however, why it should not 
 ed^t in anv other case in which the matter f our ariru- 
 
KINDS DF CERTAINTT. 30& 
 
 ment 13 pure conception. All that is necessary is that our 
 terms be accurately defined and clearly apprehended, and 
 that they be subjected- to the laws of syllogistic reasonin^^. 
 The result must be as purely truth in the one case as the 
 other. Thus, 
 
 1. All accountable beings are entitled to freedom. 
 
 2. Sylphs and gnomes are accountable beings. 
 
 3. Sylphs and gnomes are entitled to freedom. 
 Suppose the first proposition clearly undei-stood. 
 Sylphs and gnomes are imaginary beings, of which 1 
 
 form a conception just as I please. The conclusion must 
 follow as clearly and inevitably as in mathematical demon- 
 stration. 
 
 It must, however, be manifest that the range of subjects of 
 this character is extremely limited, and, ther«fore, its utility 
 by no means extensive. We live in a matter-of-fact worli. 
 We desire to enlarge our knowledge, not of mere conceptions 
 but of realities. We wish to know the laws of things actually 
 existing, and so to use them as to ascertain other laws of 
 which we are ignorant. In order to .do this, we must 
 come forth from the region of conceptions into that of real- 
 ities. Thus, the pure mathematics themselves would be 
 utterly useless, except as a discipline, unless we combined 
 them with existing facts, when they assume the form of 
 mixed mathematics. Here, however, we arrive not at abso- 
 lute, but practical certainty. Let us observe the manner 
 in which II. Practkil certainty is attained. 
 
 In this kind of reasoning, either one or both of our prem- 
 ises is some general law, or particular fact, establi.shed by 
 observation or experiment. Our conclusion, then, approachea 
 no nearer to absolute truth, than our fact or observation 
 repreaents the pure and absolutp verity. But no one pre- 
 tends that our faculties are capable of arrivii g at pure and 
 absolute truth. It has cften been remarked that a perfecl 
 
310 INTELLECT!] VL PHILCSOPHx. 
 
 cirv.l3, 01 triangle, or square, never was constructel, and 
 that no instrument ever made, could claim to be absolutely 
 accurate. Our processes may be as perfect as the present 
 condition of the arts will allow, but we can go no further. 
 Progress in the arts may enable us to exclude additional 
 causes of error, and thus arrive at greater accuracy. But 
 when we have done all, our powers are limited and imper- 
 fect ; and, to use the words of Johnson, '"a fallible being 
 oust fail somewhere." The eye is incapable of discerning 
 objects below a certain magnitude, or differences which do 
 not exceed a certain degree. The sensation of touch can 
 only detect impressions when their impulse attains to a cer- 
 tain force. Our nerves are easily fatigued, and fatigue im- 
 pairs their accuracy of observation, and their control over 
 our muscles. The various passions to which we are subject 
 influence our whole sentient organism, and frequently unfit 
 us for observation at a time when their perfect accuracy is 
 the most needed. It is said that when Sir I. Newton had 
 arrived very nearly at the close of that calculation which 
 has made his name immortal, and saw the result to which 
 he was tending, he was seized with so violent a fit of trem ■ 
 bling, that, unable to complete the work, he surrendered his 
 papei-s to a friend, by whom it was finished. It is told of 
 one of the observers sent many years ago to the Pacific 
 Ocean to observe the transit of Venus, that, at the precise 
 moment when the transit occurred, he famted from e.xcesa 
 of excitement. Perfect accuracy can, therefore, never be 
 predicated of a being in whose organization are involved 30 
 many liabilities to error. 
 
 Thus, for instance, in the mixed mathematics we arrive 
 it only practical certainty. Here we first establish the 
 relations existing between the lines of a figure of which we 
 have conceived. This is pure mathematics, and our result 
 e absolute truth. We then apply these relations to a figure 
 
KINDS OF CERTAINTY. 811 
 
 actually existing, and as nearly identical with the figure 
 which we have conceived, as we are able to make it, and 
 proceed to our result. This result is obviously not ab- 
 Rolute truth ; it is only proximate ; that is, just as near to 
 absolute truth as the actual figure is near to the perfect 
 conception which forms the basis of our reasonings. 
 
 Let us take an example. I demonstrate by pure math- 
 ematics that the homologous sides of similar tiiangles aio 
 proportional. Availing myself of this law, I proceed to 
 ascertain the height of a steeple. I measure a base line, 
 and observe the angle formed between the extremity of this 
 line and the highest point of the object. I find a corre- 
 sponding tabular triangle in the tables, and by a single pro- 
 portion arrive at the result. But is this a perfect result? 
 Its accuracy depends upon the accuracy of my measure- 
 ments of the base line and the angle. But are tliese infallible ] 
 Was my chain perfectly true ? Was the temperature such aa 
 to have effected no change upon it 7 Was the surface perfectly 
 level, and was my muscular tension precisely such as to 
 ensure perfect accuracy, and, at every movement of the chain, 
 was that tension precisely the same 7 W' as the instrument 
 with which I measured the angle, of perfect construction 
 and in perfect order I W^as there no tremor in my muscles, 
 and was my sight of the object absolutely true I No one 
 of these things can be asserted, and, unless they can all be 
 asserted, perfect accurac}' is impossible. But what then } 
 Are our results valueless 1 By no means. They are per- 
 fect for any and every practical purpose. If we have taken 
 •^vcry precaution in our power to exclude the liability of error, 
 we i.ave arrived at all the certainty which the present con- 
 j?iiion of knowledge admits. We know that our result c-an- 
 p.ot, except by accident, be perfectly accurate; bu*^ it is so 
 iccurate that neither ourselves nor any one else can detect 
 any erroi This is, to all intents and purposes, precisely 
 
312 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 as good to us as absolute certaintj. In the one case w« 
 know that there is no error ; and, in the other, although we 
 admit there may be error, yet neither we nor any one elso 
 is able to detect it. 
 
 The case is illustrated in the study of astronomy. We 
 here first conceive of spherical triangles, and determine, by 
 demonstration, the relations between them. Hf.e we arrive 
 at absolute truth. We then measure degrees on the earth's 
 surface, we take the measure of angles, we make observa- 
 tions on the times and places of planetary bodies, and, by 
 constructing triangles as far as possible identical with those 
 which we have before conceived, we determine the distance 
 of the sun, and the diameter of the orbit of the earth. But 
 does any one pretend that these calculationsareabsolutely cor* 
 rect I Their accuracy depends wholly on the perfection of 
 the observations, which, of necessity, enter as elements into 
 our calcalations. Were our measurements of lines and 
 angles absolutely perfect 7 Were our observations abso- 
 lutely inf illible 7 This, from the nature of our faculties 
 and the imperfection of instruments, is manifestly impossible. 
 Our conclusions must, therefore, share in, or must greatly 
 magnify, these imperfections. We say the sun is so many 
 millions of miles from the earth ; bnt, thus speaking, do we 
 intend to be understood as enunciating an absolute truth 7 
 Do we mean that it may not be a hundred or a thousand 
 miles either nearer or more distant 7 All we know is that 
 we are unable to discover any error ; that we have arrived 
 at as near an approximation to truth as is possible in the 
 l^ resent condition of science. We can do no more, and we 
 I letend to do no more. This is as far as our Creator has 
 (crmitted us, in our present state, to proceed, and with 
 this we must be content. When we have approached s« 
 Dear to the truth tliat we can discover no error, we have 
 irrived at practical certaintj, and we need ask for no mora 
 
KINDS OF CERTAINTI. 
 
 313 
 
 Now, if I do not mistake, this is precisely the iiiethod of 
 cur reasoning respecting any matters of fact. We reasou 
 by conceptions. If our premises, matters of fact, the result 
 >f observation, precisely correspond witli these conceptions, 
 our reasonings are true absolutely. But we cannot be sure 
 -.hat there is this perfect correspondence. We may, liow- 
 ever, be convinced that this correspondence is so nearly 
 exact that the human faculties can discover no error, and 
 here, as before, we arrive at practical certainty, or the limit 
 marked out for us by our intellectual constitution. When 
 our premises have been established with all the accuracy of 
 which our Maker has made us capable, and our conclusion 
 from thf^m follows by the laws of reasoning, we have arrived 
 at as near an approximation to truth as is possible in our pres- 
 ent state. If neither we nor any one else can point out 
 any error, we may well be satisfied ; for we may know that 
 the error can never be appreciated by the faculties which 
 God has given us ; and, therefore, to us it is precisely the 
 game as if it were absolutely true. 
 
 Thus, suppose we say, 
 
 When men can have no motive for testifying falsely, 
 their testimony is worthy of belief. 
 
 A and B can have no motive for testifying falsely ; there- 
 fore the testimony of A and B is worthy of belief. 
 
 The truth of the first of these propositions would, I pre- 
 sume, be admitted ; it being one of the acknowledged laws 
 of human action, since no man acts without a motive. The 
 second only can admit of doubt. We, therefore, make it 
 the object of special examination. We survey all the mo- 
 tives by which men are known to be influenced. We in- 
 quire whether any of these motives could have induced 
 them to speak falsely. We are unable to discover any. We 
 then rely with firmness on the conclusion that they have 
 testified truly. It may be said tnat motives for falsehood 
 27 
 
814 INTELLECTIAL t-HILOSOPHf. 
 
 may exist which have never been discovered. Be it so. But. 
 inasmuch as we have been unable to discovf^r them, we hav<3 
 arrived at the nearest approximation to truth which our 
 faculties admit, and we must relj on such faculties as we 
 possess. When, in the full and free exercise of our intel- 
 lectual powers, we can discover no error in our premise-B, 
 and no error in our reasoning, we must receive as true the 
 conclusions which thej necessitate. We have no other re- 
 source. If we deny this, there is an end to ill reasonings 
 and everything beyond our own observation is a delusion. 
 
 K we now compare these two kinds of rea;.oning, we ub- 
 serve the following facts : 
 
 1. The process which we employ is, in both rases, precisely 
 the same. When we attempt to discover truth by reason- 
 ing, we use syllogism ; for this is the mode of act-ion im- 
 posed upon our reasoning faculty. We U3e this,, for we 
 have no other to use. 
 
 2. The one kind of reasoning treats only of conceptions 
 both in its premises and its conclusions. With actual exist- 
 ences, res gestcB, it has nothing to do. Of course, it is 
 excluded from all cases which involve matters of fact. The 
 other has to do with actual existences, and to them its con- 
 clusions refer. Hence, this is the mode of reasoning which 
 we must, of necessity, employ in all the business of life, 
 and in all those investigations of science which contemplate 
 things as actual existences. 
 
 3. By the one we arrive at absolute certainty respecting 
 things net existing except in our conceptions. By the other 
 we arrive at practical certainty respecting things as exist- 
 ing wholly distinct and separate from ourselves. In the 
 one case we arrive at absolute truth ; in the other, we a[ • 
 proach as near to absolute truth as the limited and in pe. • 
 feet nature of our faculties admits. We approach sc m** 
 to it that we are unable to detect any error. 
 
KIKD8 Of CERTAIN T if. lilS 
 
 It will be observed that these two kiiuls of reasoninj]; cor- 
 respond in general to those commonly termed demonstrative 
 and moral reasoning. I have used diflferent terms fic m tliose 
 eommonly employed, because I suppose them better adapted 
 to the subject. It will be seen, if what I have said be 
 true, that the difference between these two kinds of reason- 
 ing is much less than has frequently been supposed, both ua 
 to the mode in which they are conducted, and the results at 
 which they arrive. 
 
 From what has been said, I think it will appear that but 
 little ground exists for the superiority which has been claimed 
 for demonstrative reasoning, or that which treats purely of 
 conceptions. It is granted that in this species of reasoning 
 we arrive at absolute truth ; but then, from its conditions, 
 it excludes all actual existences, and can, therefore, furnish no 
 guide to conduct. As soon as demonstrative reasonmg has 
 to do with matters of fact, it reposes, by necessity, upon 
 moral reasoning, and, specially, on the evidence of testimony. 
 Thus, suppose I have demonstrated the distance of the sun 
 from the earth. It is evident that the facts which form the 
 elements of my reasoning must be established by what is 
 called moral evidence. I am told that such and such obser- 
 vations have been made by different men, through a succes- 
 sion of years. Now, here is a two-fold liability of error. 
 In the first place, how do I know that these observations 
 were ever made at all ] I have nothing here to rely on but 
 the testimony of men. which is said to be so vastly inferior 
 in certainty to demonstration. In the second place, what 
 assurance have 1 that these observations were correctly 
 made? How shall I be sure that all the instruments were 
 perfect, or that proper skill was employed in the use of 
 them I Important errors have frequently been made by sci- 
 entific men. Sir Is;uic Newton's discoveries were for several 
 years postponed by an error in roaasui ing a degree of tb« 
 
B16 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 earth's surface. What shall guard us against similar enor 1 
 Now, if these are not reliable grounds of belief, all our dem- 
 onstration is useless ; for, on the facts which thej deliver 
 to us, all our calculations relj. Our demonstrations, then, 
 as soon as thej affect anj matter of fact, are limited in their 
 certainty by moral evidence, and they attain to no higher 
 certainty than moral e\idence confers. By the evidence .f 
 testimony, however, we are assured that these observationa 
 W(Te made. From the known characters of the observers, 
 we have every reason to believe that they were made cor- 
 rectly. On these assurances our calculations proceed, and 
 they arrive at a degree of accuracy so great that neither we 
 nor any one else can discover any error. 
 
 From these remarks we perceive theabsurdity of demand- 
 ing what is called demonstrative evidence to substantiate a 
 matter of fact. Men sometimes tell us. for instance, that a 
 revelation from God, being a matter of so great importance, 
 should have been attested by mathematical demonstration. 
 We see that to ask this is to demand what is absolutely 
 impossible. Being a matter of fact, it must come under the 
 laws of evidence which belong to matters of fact. Tg 
 attempt to prove a fact by mathematical demonstration is as 
 absurd as to attempt to prove a mathematical proposition by 
 testimony. 
 
 REFEREXCES. 
 
 Conclusions either certain or probable — Reid, Essay 6, chapter 4 , 
 Essay 7, chap. 1. 
 
 Metaphysical and mathematical reasoning — Reid, Essay 7, chapter 1 ; 
 Locke, Book 4, chapter 4, section 6. 
 
 Nature of demonstrative evidence — Stewart, vol. ii., :hap. 2, sees. 3, 4. 
 
 Superiority of mathematical reasoning — Stewart, "^i. ii., chapter 2, 
 Ifcction 3 ; Reid, Essay 7, chap, 2. 
 
 i^Iorality capable of demonstration — Locke, Book 4, ihap. 2, sections 
 ib, i8 ; chap. 3, section 18 ; chap. 4, section 7 
 
 Conc^».sions in mixed mathematics as sure as ('ata — Stewart, vol. ii , 
 
BVIDENCB OF TESTIMONY. 8J? 
 
 SECTION III. --OF THE EVIDENCE OF TESTIMONr. 
 
 In demonstrative reasoning our premises rest upon truths 
 intuitively perceived by every intellect in a normal condi- 
 tion, or else upon truths proceeding from these by necessity, 
 In reasoning concerning matters of fact, many of oui 
 premises are general laws, established by observation and 
 experience. But this observation and experience must be 
 established by many witnesses. A single individual can 
 observe but little. We must all rely upon the labors of 
 others. But how shall we distinguish true from false 
 testimony ? Many things have been recorded as true, 
 which have subsequently been found to be false. Wo 
 need, therefore, to ascertain the laws by which testimony 
 may be established, so that we may be able to proceed witn 
 certainty in our reasonings. It is, therefore, proper to ex- 
 amine this part of our subject, and determine, if possible, 
 the principles on which the evidence of testimony rests. 
 
 Testimony is of two kinds, direct and indirect. 
 
 I. Of direct testimony. 
 
 It must be admitted that the testimony of man is a source 
 Df as certain knowledge as any that we possess. If we refer 
 to our own consciousness, we find no difterence between the 
 strength of our belief in matters of fact and matters of 
 demonstration. We as perfectly believe that such persona 
 as Julius Cffisar, Cicero, Alexander, Martin Luther, Wash- 
 ington, and Napoleon, existed ; that the battles of Mara- 
 thon, Bunker Hill, Austerlitz and Waterloo, were fought ; 
 and that there are now standing the cities of London, Paris, 
 and Vienna, as we believe that the three angles of a triangle 
 are equal to two right angles. If we ask ourselves which 
 do we most confidently believe, we can discover no shade of 
 difference In any practical matter we should proceed upOB 
 
518 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 i'he belief of o.ie as rearlilj ae upon that of the other. This 
 is true of mankind universally. If this be so, then both of 
 these grounds of belief must rest equally upon the lav^s of 
 human thouglit. There must exist elementary first truths, 
 acknowled^^ed by all men, on which our confidence ulti- 
 mitely reposes. That this is true of mathematical reason- 
 ing is universally admitted. It must, however, be equally 
 true of any other mode of proof which produces the same 
 results. 
 
 Let us take another case. We are told that, a few yeara 
 since, an eclipse of the sun occurred on a Sunday, a little 
 after noon. It had been predicted by astronomers, and their 
 predictions concerning it had been extensively published. 
 Men in every place on this continent declared that they wit- 
 nessed it. The daily newspapers, immediately after it is said 
 to have occurred, were filled with accounts of the phenomena 
 that were said to have been observed. Every fact respect- 
 ing it was minutely recorded, and the statements of its 
 various phases were inserted in the transactions of learned 
 societies throughout the world. Now, granting these facta 
 to be so, could we any more doubt that an eclipse really 
 occurred, at the time and in the manner specified, than we 
 could doubt a proposition in geometry 7 Suppose that one 
 man, under these circumstances, should doubt the fact of 
 the eclipsC; and another should doubt a demonstration in 
 mathematics, should we not decide that the mind of the one 
 was in as abnormal a state as that of the other ? 
 
 Yet I am aware that there are difierences in the belief 
 in the two cases. In the one case our belief is in the truth 
 IS ^u'versaL as true at all times and in all places. In the 
 jithir, it is particular ; that is, it is not true of every time 
 and every place, but only of this time and this place. In the 
 one case our knowledge is perfect and complete ; that is, we 
 ioiow the whole cf the truth aflSrmed, and nothing can be 
 
EVIDENCE OF TESTIMONY. 81ft 
 
 idded to render our knowledge more adequate. ^\ nen I am 
 convinced that the three angles of a triangle are equal lo 
 two right angles, nothing can be added to the proposition by 
 which my knowledge can be increased. If I fully compre- 
 hend the terms, I have precisely the same knowledge of the 
 truth as Newton himself. He might have seen consequencf.a 
 df rivable from it which I do not see : but our knowledge cf 
 tlie proposition itself is entirely the same. In the case of 
 t!ie other proposition, that at a given time and place there 
 was an eclipse of the sun, it is not so. We all may be equally 
 con£dent of the main fact ; but of various circumstance* 
 respecting it, our knowledge may be dissimilar and unequal. 
 Men who observed the eclipse may have been more or less 
 influenced by their imaginations ; they may have dissimilar 
 appreciations of the temperature, of the degree of darkness, 
 of the time and duration of the event. Hence their narra- 
 tives may in these respects differ; and it may require much 
 labor to ootain a complete idea of the eclipse; and there may, 
 after all, remain many circumstances which we know but 
 imperfectly. All this may be granted, and yet it does not 
 in the least affect our belief of the main fact. Nay, all 
 these variations must exist if the main fact be true. They 
 follow from the differences in the subjective nature of man. 
 Hence the rule in testimony is that the best evidence to 
 any fact is, agreement of witnesses as to the main event, and 
 difference as to the minor particulars. 
 
 The following striking illustration of these remarks ia 
 woithy of notice. I presume that no one can doubt that 
 the battle of Waterloo was fought on the eighteenth of June, 
 1815, between the French and the allies, under the com- 
 jcand respectively of Napoleon and Wellington. It may 
 certainly be taken for granted that men believe this Gict aa 
 inrioubtiugly as they do any proposition in geometry. Yet 
 he time of the commencement of the battle cannot even now 
 
iJiJO INTELLECTUAL PHILOirOfHT. 
 
 be settled with precision In Maxwell's life cf Wellington 
 I find the following statement: 
 
 " The time Avhen the battle began has been stated witt 
 marked contrariety. The Duke of Wellington says it cora* 
 menced about ten o'clock, and further observes tliat when 
 his troops discontinued the pursuit, at night, they had been 
 engaged twelve hour% In this General Gneisenau concurs, 
 but, of course, only from mformation he had received. 
 General Alava, who was by the side of the duke the 
 whole day, fixes it at half-past eleven. Napoleon and Gen- 
 3ral Drouet state twelve as the hour ; Avhile Marshal Ncy 
 names one o'clock. Without tracing minuter contradictions, 
 this may suffice to show the difficulty of attaining exact 
 knowledge when it might have been presumed no difficulty 
 could exist. With one exception, which I think ought to 
 be decisive, I was equally bewildered by the intelligence I 
 received from officers whom I had an opportunity of con- 
 sulting. By one I was told that the battle began soon after 
 mid-day, by another exactly twenty minutes past eleven, and 
 by a third at ten o clock. But Sir George Wood — and his 
 information is what I conceive cannot be disputed — gave 
 me the following statement. The action commenced about 
 half-past ten or a quarter to eleven. There had been skir- 
 mishing, before, all the morning. A column of the enemy 
 was advancing against Hougomont, and the first gun that 
 was fired was from our lines against that column. I gavs 
 the order by the command of the duke. The gun did imme- 
 diate execution, and killed six or eight. This column then 
 retired, and went round the wood." — Maxwells Life of 
 Wellington, vol. 8, note to page 479. 
 
 We perceive, from this incident, how dissimilar is the 
 adequ^teness of our knowledge in a matter of fust, from 
 that in an abstract geometrical proposition j and yet "ui 
 
EVIDENCE Ox TESTIMO^'Y. 82j 
 
 Bonfidenoe n the truth of the main fact is as great in th« 
 one case as in the other. 
 
 But. it may be very properly demanded, is testimony of 
 ell kinds etjually worthy of belief ? Are we not very often 
 the dupes of false evidence - We reply, that in this respect 
 we are all very liable to be deceived. But the case is the 
 same ^Yith mathematical evidence or demonstration. Hovr 
 often has it been announced that men have demonstrated 
 the quadrature of the circle ; but, upon examination, it haa 
 been discovered that either they have been deceived, or that 
 they desired to deceive others. Either they had commenced 
 with false principles, or they had reasoned incorrectly from 
 true ones. So in the mixed mathematics, innumerable errora 
 have from time to t'me been discovered and corrected. This, 
 however, presents no objection to the validity or reliability of 
 mathematical reasoning. It only teaches us the necessity of 
 examining our arguments with care, and assuring oursehed 
 that our reason im^ are conducted strictly according to the 
 laws of mathematical proof When they are so conducted, 
 they never did and they never can lead to error. So in the 
 case of evidence. It is granted that we are liable to be de- 
 ceived by reliance upon testimony. But this by no means 
 proves that testimony is worthless ; or that testimony, when 
 given strictly according to the laws of evidence, is not as 
 reliable as demonstration. It only teaches us tlie necessity 
 of subjacting testimony to its own appropriate laws, that we 
 m ly thus separate the true from the false. If, therefore, 
 we can establish the elementary laws of evidence, and tpply 
 them strictly to any case of testimony, we receive the ^sult 
 to which they lead us with unquestioning confidence. 
 
 The essential and self-evident truths on which t e evi- 
 dence of testimony rests, seem to be two. The pst if 
 the law of percept io7i, tn which allusion has been made 
 fvhen treating of that subject. It may be expressr^l at 
 
tC-2 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 follows; Whinever, in the normal condition of our facul' 
 ties, we are conscious of a perception, then there exists an 
 Dbject, such as we perceive, as the cause of that perception. 
 I cannot perceive what I will. The consciousness of per- 
 ception must be excited from without, and it cannot exist 
 unrlei normal conditions, unless a corresponding object from 
 without give occasion to it. I am conscious that I per- 
 eeive the paper on which I now write, and the table at 
 which I am seated. I could not, by the laws of my being, 
 be thus conscious, unless there existed here and now these 
 objects which give rise to it. 
 
 Under the term normal conditions, as here used, several 
 things are to be supposed. For instance, the external cir- 
 cumstances must be such as to admit of no liability to error, 
 If I testify to an object of sight, the light must be suffi- 
 cient to allow me to see correctly. If I testify to an object 
 of sound, I must be near enough to hear it distinctly. The 
 same remark applies to the other senses. 
 
 The mind must be in a normal condition. The witness 
 must be sane. He must be free from any violence of pas- 
 sion or excitement of imagination, which would lead to erro- 
 neous observation. Thus, if a man were habitually terrified 
 in passing by a grave-yard, we should receive with ^reat 
 suspicion his testimony respecting a ghost which he believevl 
 he had seen seated on a tomb-stone. Intense prejudice, 
 which affected the matter in question, would lead to similar 
 suspicions. 
 
 Tl.( senses must be in a normal condition. No one would 
 repose perfect confidence in the testimony of a man to a 
 visual fact, whose eyes were either partly blind or subject 
 to optical illusions. 
 
 Here, however, two remarks deserve attention. First, 
 We always take it for granted that men are in a normaj 
 »ndition unless there is evidence to the contrary Nc 
 
SVIDEXCE OF TESTIMONY. dSo 
 
 man is ever culled upon to prove his sanity. The verv Hict 
 that he is thus called upon, must proceed upon the suppo- 
 sition that lie is able to construct a proof: that is. that he 
 is sane. He who affirms that another is insane, must him- 
 self furnish the evidence ; and, in the absence of such evi- 
 dence, the contrary is to be taken for granted. 
 
 Secondly, it is to be remarked that abnormal cases are 
 extremely rare. We may meet a thousand individuals, 
 without finding one among them whose condition is, in any 
 respect, so abnormal as to affect his testimony. And hence, 
 when a number of persons agree in testifying to the saUiO 
 fact, the supposition of abnormal action is excluded. Thus, 
 if only one person had testified that he saw an eclipse, we 
 migbl suppose that his mind or his organs were diseased. 
 But to suppose that so large a number of persons, in differ- 
 ent places, weie in an abnormal condition, and in precisely 
 the same condition, at the same time, is manifestly absurd. 
 The second general law is derived from the nalun 
 of the active powers of man. It may be stated as fol • 
 lows : 
 
 1. Every human action is the residt of motive. That 
 is to say. when there is no motive there is no action. 
 
 2. When there is no motive for speaking falsely^ 
 men always speak the truth. The motive which leadg 
 men to speak falsely may be very unreasonable or insuffi- 
 cient. They will sometimes speak falsely against their owa 
 permanent interest ; but they always speak from a present 
 motive, as fear, vanity, desire of applause, etc. 
 
 3. When no motive can be conceived wJiy men should 
 testify as iht-y do, but thh love of truth ; and every oihtr 
 conceivable motive would impel them to testify differ- 
 ently, then they testify from the love of truth ; that is, 
 they ctffirm ichat they believe to be true. To suppose the 
 contrary is absurd. For, if no motive but the love </ truth 
 
K24 IN'TEL^FCTUAL i iSILOSOPHT. 
 
 could impel them to their present testimony, tz roppose tha 
 love of truth removed, — that is, suppose them to testify 
 falsely, — is to suppose men to act without any motive, 
 and in opposition to every conceivable motive. This ia 
 diametrically opposed to ttie laws of human action. To 
 Buppose any one to act in this manner, is to suppose him 
 not to be endowed with proper human faculties. 
 
 But it may be said that motives for speaking falsely may 
 exist, though we cannot conceive of them. Granted. But 
 then we have arrived at the point previously mentioned ; 
 that is, we have come so near the truth that we can discover 
 no source of error. We have, therefore, attained to that 
 practical certainty which is all that is given to us in estab- 
 lishing any matter of fact. When we have gone so far, we 
 have reached the limit which the Creator has assigned to our 
 faculties, and v,e can proceed no further. 
 
 Again ; in the case supposed, when many witnesses tes- 
 tify, this motive which no one can assign, which no one 
 ventures to announce, and which no one has yet discovered, 
 must have influenced a number of persons, against every 
 conceivable interest, to testify to the same thing. To make 
 such a supposition the ground either of belief or disbelief, 
 is manifestly absurd ; but to make it the ground of either, 
 in opposition to testimony established by the laws of evi- 
 dence, exhibits a state of mind for which it is difficult to 
 find a name. 
 
 But suppose that on such ground as this the evidence of 
 testimony is to be disi-egarded, what is the result 7 Evi- 
 dently, that no fact in history or science could be believed, 
 unless we luid seen it with our own eyes. The past would 
 te a universal blank. Books would be useless, o.nd the 
 ^ii^le of human knowledge must be limited to our own 
 individual experiences. There is here no middle path. 
 Eithci W3 must receive everj'thing established by the strict 
 
BVIDENCK OF TESTIMONY. 82^ 
 
 laws of evidence, or we must receive nothing. TMiich ia 
 the alternative to be chosen by a reasonable intelligence, it 
 is not difficult to discover. He who desires to see this sub- 
 ject treated with great acuteness and admirable humor, 
 should read Archbishop Whately's " Historical Doubta 
 relative to Napoleon Buonaparte." 
 
 At some risk of prolixity, I will illustrate this subject by 
 *ji example to which I have before referred. 
 
 It is granted that a great number of persons, of different 
 ages and pursuits, and in various places throughout this 
 country, testified that on a particular day they witnessed a 
 total eclipse of the sun. In what manner shall we exarLine 
 this evidence, in order to ascertain whether their testimony 
 is worthy of belief ? 
 
 In the first place, we appeal to the law of perception. 
 Was this an event which they were all capable of observ- 
 ing 7 Could they have been conscious of perceiving it, un- 
 less the event had actually occurred 7 On this subject there 
 cannot exist the shadow of a doubt. Every one will ad- 
 mit that if these persons were all conscious that they per- 
 ceived the eclipse, the eclipse must have taken place. 
 
 Secondly, were they really conscious that they perceived 
 it ; that is, did they testify truly ? 
 
 Here we turn to the law of human motive. W'j say no 
 motive but the love of truth could have impelled all these 
 persons, of different ages, habits, culture and prejudices, in 
 many different places, to unite in this testimony. Take 
 away the love of truth, — that is, suppose them to speak 
 falsely, — and we must suppose them to act individually with- 
 out any motive ; and, still more, that without any motive 
 they all, and without concert, united in giving the siin« 
 testimony. The absurdity of this supposition is, I think, 
 obvioas. 
 
 This testimony svould be still more irresistible, if tiu 
 28 
 
326 INTELLECTUAL PniLOSOmY. 
 
 persons who testified were, in eonsequonce of thoir evido.ioo 
 exposed to contempt, obloquy, persecution, loss of prdpertj 
 and of life. In this case, to suppose them to testify fakely. 
 would be to suppose them to act not only without any mo 
 tive, but in opposition to every motive. It is impossible to 
 suppose an intelligent being with a human constitution to 
 act in this manner. 
 
 In such a case as this, we show that what is testified to 
 is true, or else an intuitive law of perception, or an intui- 
 tive law of human action is violated. When we have done 
 this, we have done all that reasoning can do. This is all 
 we do in demonstrative or mathematical reasoning. We 
 there show that unless a proposition be true, an axiom, or an 
 intuitive law of quantity, is violated. We can go no further. 
 In either case, where we have shown this, the proposition in 
 question has been proved. Facts thus established have 
 never been shown to be false. Indeed, they never could 
 be disproved, for we can never be more ceitain of anything 
 than of the intuitive laws of our OAvn nature. Suppose that 
 the Opposite of what we have thus proved wns also proved, 
 It could not show the first proposition to be false. It would 
 only establish an opposite proposition on equivalent evidence, 
 and we should be perfectly unable to choose between two 
 contradictory propositions, both being perfiectly entitled to 
 belief 
 
 From these remarks it will appear, that, in establishing 
 any fact by testimony, two points, and but two, are of neces- 
 sity to be made evident. First, that if the witnesses were 
 conscious of perceiving it, it really must hare occurred. 
 Here wt show that the event was one propeily cognizable 
 by the senses, that the witnesses were in propei* conditions, 
 objective and subjective, for observing it ; that is, that the 
 impression on their senses must have been made under tha 
 ordinary law3 of perception. In the second placf", we show 
 
EVIDENCE ")F TESTIMOXT. 3l!7 
 
 that the witnesses testify to what they really believe to be 
 true; that is. they really believe themselves to have been 
 conscious of the perception in question. We here show that 
 there can be no motive for testifying falsely; that is, to 
 suppose them to testify falsely, is to suppose them to act 
 without motive. If we can proceed further, and show that 
 if they testify falsely, they not only act without any motive, 
 but in opposition to every motive, we have then the same 
 evidence as if every witness was on oath. 
 
 In this manner we prove any fact in history ; as the death 
 of Caesar in the senate-house, his conquest of Britain, or 
 any other event. On these principles trials are conducted 
 every day in our courts of law. I do not know of any 
 method by which a student will improve his knowledge of 
 the science of evidence more advantageously, than by an- 
 alyzing carefully the evidence in important trials, when the 
 decision depends upon the establishment of matters of fact. 
 If the above remarks be correct, they will enable him to 
 carry on this examination and analysis with some degree of 
 success. 
 
 IE. Of indirect or circumstayitial evidence. 
 In the preceding remarks I have considered the case in 
 which the witnesses testify directly to the fact in question; 
 that is, they declare that they themselves perceived the 
 fact which they relate. 
 
 But cases are continually occurring in which it is impor- 
 tant to establish a fact to which there were no witnesses. 
 How, in the absence of witnesses, shall such a fact be 
 pioved? This is done by indirect or circumstantial e7i- 
 dence. The principles on which we here proceed are aa 
 fellows : 
 
 It Is obvious, from the regular succession of cause and 
 effect, to which all the changes in the universe are sub- 
 jvcted, that no event can occur isolate' and alone. I do 
 
3528 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHl. 
 
 not know that, as we are constituted, it is possiblo for us ta 
 conceive of such an event. Everj phenomenon is indissolu- 
 ble connected with other phenomena, to which it stands in 
 permanent rehitions. When we see water changed into ice 
 we know that it must have been exposed to a temperuturQ 
 as low as 32°. When water boils, we know that its tempera- 
 ture has been raised to 212 \ If a body at rest b -gins to 
 move, or if. when moving, it changes suddenly its direction^ 
 we know that some force must have been applied to it. 
 These changes could not have produced themselves ; they 
 are the result of some stated antecedent. Now, if we can 
 show the existence of a train of facts, so related to the fact 
 in question, that unless this fact occurred the laws of cause 
 and effect must have been violated, then we have proved the 
 main fact by indirect, or circumstantial evidence. 
 
 The rules which govern us in this kind of evidence are 
 the following : 
 
 1. When we are not mqun-ing for a f\ct, but for th« 
 cmse of it, the fact itself must first be est iblished. Thus, if 
 it be rt^quired to prove that A murdered B, we must first 
 prove that 13 was murdered, and prove it by direct evidence. 
 
 2. In the second place, all the facts, on which we rely to 
 prove the fact in question, must be established by direct 
 evidence. Thus, if we rely on the facts A, B, D, to prove 
 the fact C, — that is, these facts being proved, that the fact 
 C must have existed, — we must prove the facts A, B, and 
 D, by the personal knowledge of witnesses themselves. 
 
 3. We must show that the facts A, B, and D, could not 
 have existed unless the fiict C had existed. WTien we have 
 established these f icts, and shown that they can be accounted 
 for on no other supposition than the existence of the fact C, 
 — that is, that unless the fact C occurred, a law of nature 
 has been violated, — then we have proved this f»ct by inJi' 
 root evidence. 
 
INDIRECl EVIDENCE. 
 
 This, however, -will be rendered more cvider. by an el 
 ample. Take the ibllowiEg case. B is found alone in a 
 room, deid, stabbed in the back and bis skull fractured by 
 the stroke of a bludgeon. The fii-st thing to be established 
 is that the man is dead ; and, secondly, that his death w^a 
 occasioned by the wounds upon his person; and, thirdly. th;.t 
 the wounds could not have been inflicted by himself; that 
 is, that he died by the hands of another, and not by his own. 
 These flicts must be proved by direct evidence. It is thus 
 shown that the man was murdered. The question next to 
 be answered is, who was the murderer 7 
 
 Here it is shown that A and B unlocked the door and 
 entered the room together. A noise, as of altercation, waa 
 heard. No one entered the room until A left it, an' the 
 first person who entered it after his departure found B dead 
 in the manner described. Now. these facts having been 
 established, it is proved that A is the murderer. The man 
 is dead. He died of these wounds. They could have been 
 inflicted by no person except A or B himself. They are so 
 situated that B could not have inflicted them on himself, 
 they must, therefore, have been inflicted by A. 
 
 But, besides these, other antecedent and subsequent facts 
 may confirm the supposition of the guilt of A. For instance, 
 men do not commonly commit such a crime without a vio- 
 lent motive. If such a motive existed, it gives confirmation 
 to the supposition of his guilt. And, again, when a man 
 has committed so atrocious a crime, he is commonly appre- 
 hensive, and takes means to escape the consequences. If 
 B was known to enter the room with a purse of gold and 
 was found with his pockets rifled, and if- this purse was 
 {onvA in the possession of A, this will furnish a motive for 
 the deed. If A immediately afterwards changed his name 
 disguised his person, and was preparing immediately to 
 *'^xip€ from the vicinity, and no reason but his guilt can bo 
 28*- 
 
8ii0 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOl'Hr. 
 
 assigned for his conduct, this is a strong confirmatory cir» 
 euinstance. The supposition that he was the murderer caL 
 alone account for all his subsequent conduct. 
 
 Ilonce, we see the points which are to be made out bj 
 the prosecution in any trial where the evidence is circum- 
 Btantial. First, the crime must have been committed. FoJ 
 instance, if it be a case of murder, the body must be found, 
 and it must be proved that the death was caused by violence. 
 Second, the facts must be such as can be accounted for on 
 no oth«r supposition than that the accused was the murderer. 
 If they can be accounted for on any other reasonable suppo- 
 sition, then the case is not proved. And, on the other 
 hand, the ground of the defence is, first, that the deceased 
 did not die by violence ; or, in general, that he was not mur- 
 dered ; or that, if murdered, the facts can be accounted for 
 on some other supposition. The facts in all cases must bo 
 established, as I have said, by direct testimony. 
 
 In every trial, A\here the evidence is circumstantial, we 
 hear much said about the uncertainty of this kind of en- 
 dence, and various cases are mentioned in which the lives 
 of innocent men have been sacrificed in consequence of this 
 uncertainty. This may have been the case when the prin- 
 ciples of evidence were less perfectly understood than at 
 present. But, if a trial is conducted according to the rules 
 of evidence as at present established, circumstantial proof 
 may be relied on with as much certainty as direct. Men 
 may be mistaken as to a fact, or they may swear falsely . 
 but a well-connected chain of circumstances can rarely de- 
 ceive us. It is somewhat remarkable, that, in a late trial 
 for murder in -Boston, where the evidence was circum- 
 stantial, the circumstances proved, all led to the true result ; 
 while the direct evidence, intended to prove an alili. waa 
 absolutely, though innocently, erroneous. 
 
 This kind of evidence is frequently resorted to in scientiOo 
 
INDIRECT EVIDENCE. 831 
 
 investigations. Certain flictg are observed. In ^vhat man- 
 ner are they to be accounted for? that is. \\hat must have 
 been the nature and tlie order of the changes by wliich these 
 appearances were produced? When we have conceived of 
 a cause, or succession of causes, which wdl account for all 
 the facts, and which alone can account for them, we may 
 consider such cause or causes as matter of established truth. 
 Thus, a geologist observes that a river has cut its way 
 through banks a hundred feet high. Some thirty feet be- 
 low the surface of the soil a layer of vegetable matter ia 
 discovered, the stumps of trees, standing upright, imbedded 
 in the soil where they grew, and the trees broken off lying 
 upon and by the side of them. Some thirty feet lower, 
 mother stratum of a similar character is observed. From 
 the position of these trees it is evident that they also must 
 have grown on the spot where they are found, and, of course, 
 that each of these layers must have been, at tlie time of its 
 growth, on the surface of the earth. There is but one way 
 in which these facts can be accounted for. After the low-er 
 layer of trees had grown to its present size, the surface of 
 the earth nmst have subsided until tliey were covered with 
 drift for thirty or more feet. The subsidence was then ar- 
 rested until another forest grew up. Another subsidence 
 must have occurred until the drift covered the timber again 
 to a similar depth. Then the whole surfice must have been 
 upheaved to its present position, and, afterwards, the river 
 must have cut its way through the mass, thus laying bare the 
 mode of its formation. As no otiier cause can be assigned 
 for tlicso effects, we are warranted in believing that such 
 events as these actually existed. 
 
 It will be seen that direct and circumstantial evidence 
 may fre(iuently be found corroborating each otiier, and they 
 dion present the strongest possible ground of belief If anj 
 maiked event occur, not only will it be seer by witnesses. 
 
SdZ INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 but it will ha preceded by its appropriate causes, and fol- 
 lowed by its appropriate effects. Thus, the death of Cajsaf 
 is proved by the testimony of eye-witnesses, and contem- 
 porary writers. But, besides this, the civil wars in the 
 Roman empire, and the character of the parties that were 
 formed immediately after that event is said to have taien 
 place, can be accounted for on no other supposition than 
 that of his violent death. So the invasion and occupation 
 of Britain by the Romans is proved by the testimony of 
 historians. But if such an event had occurred, we should 
 naturally expect that some traces of their occupation would 
 be observed in that island. Hence, we examine, and find 
 there the remains of Roman encampments, walls, roads, 
 Roman coins of that age, and inscriptions which could have 
 been made by no other people. These facts can be ac- 
 counted for on no other supposition than that of the conquest 
 and permanent occupation of Britain by the former con- 
 querors of the world. This coincidence of direct and indi- 
 rect evidence furnishes the most perfect ground of belief 
 ^hich we can conceive to any matter of fact. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Evidence of testimony — Reid, Essay 7, sec. 3 ; Stewart, toI. ii., chap 
 2j sec. 4 ; .Ibercrombie, Part 2, sec. 3. 
 
 DifiFerent Icinds of evidence — Reid, Essay 2, chap. 20. 
 
 Testimony of others a source of knowledge — Locke, Book 4, chap, 16, 
 tecs. 6 — 8 ; Abercrombie, Part 2, sec. 3. 
 
 Law*, of testimony — Abercrombie, Part 2, sec. 3. 
 
 Natural bias to truth — Abercrombie, Part 2, sec. 3 ; P^iJ's Isqcrry 
 ibap. 6, sec. 24. 
 
 Hume's argument against miracles — Abercrombie, Part 2, sec i 
 
 Case when witnesses are numerous — Abercrombie, Part 2, see. S 
 
 CiPcumstantLvl evideace — At orcroubie. Part 2, aid. i. 
 
PROBABLE SEASONING 33i 
 
 SB\.'TI01C IV. --OTHER FORMS OF REASONI.Vl. 
 
 I. (Jf probihle evidence. 
 
 Thus far I have treated of those modes of reasoning in 
 which our premises are acknowledged to be true, and our 
 OOQclusion is equally, that is, absolutely true. But all of 
 our reasoning is not of this character. It frequently hap- 
 pens that our premises rise no higher than probability, and 
 our conclusions can only reach the same level. Our process 
 is, however, precisely the same, the only difference consists 
 in the degree of certainty to which we arrive. 
 
 When the reasons for believing a proposition to be true 
 are not such as to establish belief, but only to sliow that it 
 i» more likely to happen than not, we say that such a propo 
 sition is probable. Thus, if the wind is in a certain quarter. 
 1 say that it probably will rain. I examine the evidence 
 that may be adduced in favor of the proposition that the 
 planets are inhabited, and I say that it is or is not probable. 
 It may require the cooperation of several causes to render 
 an event certain. If, however, only a part of these causes 
 unite in a particular case, the event may occur, though we 
 cannot expect it with confidence. So, if an intelligent being 
 has several times, under given circumstances, acted in a par- 
 ticular manner, we form a distinct anticipation that he will 
 act in the sarje manner under similar circumstances. But 
 here our anticipation only amounts to a probability, for we 
 know not what changes may have taken place in his charac- 
 tei since we last observed him ; and there may have arisen 
 circumstances which affect him )f which we are ignorant. 
 When, in this manner, we attain to mere probability, we call 
 our state of mind opinion ; that is, we judge a proposition 
 more likely to be true than false. 
 
 Vi'e take such oj^inions as the grounds of oar reasoningi 
 
J34 INIELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY, 
 
 rn a l;irge number of cases in practical life Thus, w 
 say, 
 
 It is probable that tlje character of a human being will be 
 improved by affliction. 
 
 A. B. has suffered affliction ; therefore, 
 
 A. B. is probably improved in character. 
 
 Or, again : 
 
 If there be war in Europe, the price of breadstuffs will rise 
 
 There will piobab'y be a wai in Europe ; therefore. 
 
 It is piobable that the price of breadstuffs will rise. 
 
 Wlien only one of our premises .^s a doubtful and the 
 other a certain proposition, the probability of our conclusion 
 is equal to that of our doubtful premise. Thus, it being 
 granted that if there be war in Europe pr.'c<t.s will rise, the 
 probability of our conclusion is precisely a? ^raat as the 
 probability of a war. When, however, lothol our premisea 
 are mere probabilities, the probability of our ccn^ilusion ii 
 greatly reduced, and can rarely furnis,'i a grouni .^cr aii 
 opinion. Thus, 
 
 If the south wind blow to-morrow, it will probably raA' 
 
 The south wind will probably blow to morrow; thereforr 
 
 It is (very slightly) probable that it Avill rain. 
 
 When so slight an indication of an event is given, it it 
 manifestly of very little use in forming a judgment. 
 
 From the fact that we reason from probabilities, verj 
 commonly, in the practical business of life, it has happened 
 that this mode of reasoning has sometimes been confounded 
 with that by which we arrive at practical certainty. It has 
 sometimes been said that moral reasoning, or reasoning 
 concerning matters of fact, is nothing e Ise than a wocession 
 of probable arguments, each one reducing the liabilities of 
 error, until they become so small as to be inapprev^iable. 
 The cases, however, are dissimilar. In ihv one case, we pr.r>- 
 seed from an approximation to truth &o near that neith<>j 
 
PROBABLE REASONING. 33!) 
 
 we nor other men carx discover any error, and the result is 
 of the same character. In the other case, we proceed from 
 an approximation to truth, but so distant that we can appre- 
 ciate our liabdity to error ; we know the uncertainty of oui 
 premises, and the result is a mere approximation similai 
 to them, producing not belief, but merely opinion. For iu- 
 2tance, suppose we endeavor to ascertain whether the battle 
 of Waterloo was fought on the 18th of June, 1815 Wc 
 proceed according to the laws of evidence as before stated 
 We apply the rule of perception, and the rule of human 
 motive. We can discover no error, and no other man can 
 discover any. I rely upon the result at which I have 
 arrived with perfect confidence, and the state of mind of 
 which I am conscious is belief, full, entire, and unquestion- 
 able. Again ; the question is asked, when did the battle 
 commence I I find that here the accounts vary. The best 
 authorities differ, some placing it as early as ten o'clock, 
 and others as late as one. I lorm an opinion, by comparing 
 the accounts, and balancing the probable motives which 
 •would lead men into error. I form an opinion as to the 
 time, but it is not belief. I am conscious of a state of mind 
 very dissimilar to that in the preceding case. 
 
 Or, again ; from the data established by observation as 
 accurate as the faculties of men will permit, we determine 
 the distance and magnitude of the planet Jupiter. No error 
 can be discovered either in our data or our reasoning. We 
 know that there may be error, but that it cannot exceed a 
 certain amount, and we rely on the result under this oon- 
 litjoa with absolute certainty. But when it is said the 
 f linct Jupiter is inhabited, we collect our data, and they 
 give us nothing but a probability to reason from, and we 
 arrive at nothing but an opinion. The states of mind dif- 
 fer not ill degree but in kind. The one proceeds from data 
 in wliich no error can be discovered by the faculties which 
 
336 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 God has given us. The other proceeds from data -which w« 
 know to be uncertain, and the uncertainty of Avhich we are 
 able to appreciate. Thej, of course, lead to an entirely dif- 
 ferent subjective result, and a line of distinct demarcation 
 must ever separate the one from the other. 
 
 II. Reasoning from induction. 
 
 The object of this mode of reasoning is to establish a 
 i^eneral law, from the observation of particular instances. 
 The principle on which it depends has been already ex- 
 plained, when treating of cause and eifect. See pages 153 
 -158. 
 
 It is in conformity with our intuitive beliefs, that, from 
 observing a change, we proceed to ascertain its cause. We 
 know that, wherever the cause exists, the effect must neces" 
 sarily follow, and that wherever an event always follows a 
 given antecedent, this antecedent must be the cause. We 
 therefore observe all the various phenomena which pre- 
 cede a change. We ascertain, so fir as possible, which of 
 them is the invariable antecedent ; in other words, that which 
 being present the effect exists, and which being removed the 
 effect ceases. When this has been done, we consider our- 
 selves to have ascertained the cause. 
 
 Having thus determined, by experiment, the cause in this 
 particular case, we proceed as follows : 
 
 What is the cause of this effect in one case must be the 
 cause in all cases. 
 
 The ever/t A is the cause in this case; therefore. 
 
 The event A is the cause in all cases. 
 
 It frequently happens that there are several antecedents, 
 »Dd the greatest skill and the most persevering sagacity are 
 roquisit'^ in order to determine which of them is in\'ariable. 
 Vfe are obliged to try every variety of combinations, in order 
 CG ascertain with perfect precision the cause, and to sever 
 It from every occasional and variable antecedent. When, 
 
ANALOGY. ' &37 
 
 iJOwever, this is done, we generalize with entire confidence, 
 Mid consider the law as established. 
 
 T)ie manner in which we proceed, in such a case, is i'lus- 
 trated most happily in the process employed by Sir Isaac 
 Newton to discover the cause of the solar spectrum. The 
 full account may be found in the third chapter of Sir David 
 Brewster's life of this great philosopher. 
 
 III. Of reasoning from analogy. 
 
 In this form of reasoning, we do not attempt to prove a 
 proposition true, and we may not even attempt to prove it 
 probable. All that we generally desire is to prove it not 
 improbable. 
 
 In the other cases of which we have treated, we proceed 
 upon the supposition that the same cause, under the same 
 conditions, will produce the same effects. Here we proceed 
 upon the supposition, not that the same cause will produce 
 the same effect, but merely that similar causes may produce 
 similar effects, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. 
 
 If this mode of reasoning were reduced to a syllogism \% 
 would take substantially the following form : 
 
 1. Similar causes may produce similar effects. 
 
 2. The cause A is similar to the cause B ; 
 
 3. Therefore the cause A and B may produce similar 
 effects. 
 
 The principal uses of analogical reasoning are the follow- 
 
 1. It is frequently employed with success in answering 
 an a priori objection. It is thus used with great acutenesa 
 and unanswerable force, by Bishop Butler, in his Analogy, 
 Thus, if men deny the existence of God, and hence infer 
 that there can be no future state of rewards and punish- 
 ments, his answer is as follows : It is granted, even by 
 atheists themselves, that in the present state we are rewarded 
 for scime acticns and punished for others ; that ib, tluit wo 
 2ii 
 
3S8 INTELLECTUAL IHIL050PHT. 
 
 find ourselves under a moral government. But, if we ex.ii 
 under such conditions now, when, bj the supposition, lher< 
 is no God, there can be no reason assigned why we may uo( 
 continue to exist after death, and exist under the same con- 
 ditions as at present ; that is, under a moral government, in 
 which we shall be rewarded and punished according to the 
 character of our actions. The whole of this admirable 
 tr.atiaC, one of the most remarkable that any language can 
 produce, is intended to show that the principles of moral 
 government taught in the Scriptures are strictly analogous 
 to those everywhere exhibited in the government of the 
 world, as seen by natural religion. Hence, it is evident 
 that if God has adopted these principles for our government 
 in one case, there can be no a priori reason why he should 
 .\ot adopt them in another case. " It will here be found," 
 says he, " not taken for granted, but proved, that any rea- 
 sonable man, who will thoroughly consider the matter, may 
 be as much assured as he is of his own being, that it is not 
 so clear a case that there is nothing in it." 
 
 "While, however, analogy claims to do no more than this, 
 it, in many cases, in fact, does much more. It is evident 
 that the greater the similarity of cause the greater is the 
 probability of the similarity of effects. It may thus, in 
 some cases, approximate to proof; at the least, it furnishes 
 grounds for a decided opinion. Thus, the similarity of 
 many of the effects of electricity and galvanism created the 
 opinion that they were the same agent, before their identity 
 was discovered. 
 
 2. It will readily appear that an important use of analo- 
 gy is to aid us in scientific investigation. Suppose for in 
 stance, that we have discovered the cause for a well-known 
 effect. We observe another effect of a similar character, 
 and we instinctively are led to inquire, may it notarise from 
 tl.e same or a similar cause ^ Hence in our search afteJ 
 
ANALOGY. 339 
 
 causes, we are grca\lj aided and much usele,^ labor is saved 
 by such an indication. Thus, Sir II. Davy discovered the 
 metallic basis of potash. But there are other alkalies in 
 many of their sensible properties nearly allied to potash. 
 How natural was it for him to expect that the same lawa 
 governed them all, and that thej all were formed in the same 
 manner from metallic bases ! 
 
 3. Analogy is frequently used by the orator with great 
 eftect. Thus, if it is admitted that a man has acted in one 
 way at one time, there is no reason why he might not be 
 expected to act in the same way at another time. Or, if it 
 is honorable for one man to act in a particular manner in 
 one case, there can be no reason why it is not honorable for 
 another man, in a case essentially alike, to act in a similar 
 manner. This mode of reasoning is used -with the happiest 
 success by Erskine, in the introduction of his argument for 
 Stockdale. He commences by alluding to the fact that, though 
 connected by ties of the closest intimacy with the political 
 party who had directed the prosecution, yet, Mr. Stockdale 
 had not hesitated to entrust him with his defence. He adds, 
 ' This, however, is a matter of daily occurrence. So unsul- 
 lied is the charaeter of the English bar, that no political 
 bias ever interferes with tlie discharge of the duty of -tj ad 
 vocate ; that, whatever may be our public principles, cc tUv 
 private habits of our lives, they never cast even « ohaJt 
 across the path of our professional duties. If this hi. char 
 actcristic of the bar of an English court of justice what 
 sacred impartiality may not every man expect from i:s ju- 
 rors and its bench." Many similar instances may be found 
 in the speeches of this eminent orator, perhaps the most 
 consummate advocate of modern times. 
 
 It is, however, obvious, that this mode of reasoning is lia- 
 ble to great abuse. The whole force of the arguiocnt de« 
 peu'is on the similarity of the cases. But if *n advocaU 
 
540 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 caii present cases seeming to be similar, while, in fact, they 
 are widely diverse, he may draw from them the most erro* 
 neous conclusions. It is, therefore, the business of an oppo- 
 nent, or of an inquirer after truth, to examine reasoning of 
 this kind with the closest scrutiny ; and, when it is defective, 
 point out the dissimilarity of the cases, and show the result 
 to which such analogies would lead, if we allowed them to 
 form the foundation of our judgment. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Probable eyidence — Stewart, vol. ii., chap. 2, sec. 4 ; Locke, Book I, 
 chap. 15 ; Abercrombie, Part 2, sec. 3. 
 
 Induction — Reid, chap. 6, sec. 24; Stewart, vol. ii., chap. 4, sec. Ij 
 Cousin, chap. 9. 
 
 Analogy — Reid's Inquiry, Essay 1, chap. 4; Stewart, vol. ii., chap. '2, 
 eec. 4, chap. 4, sec. 4 ; Locke, Book 5, chap. 16, sec. 12; Abercrombie, 
 Part 3, sec. 4. 
 
 Herschel's Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. 
 
 Remarks on Analogical Reasoniug iu Whately's Rhetoric. 
 
 Bacon's Novum Organon. 
 
 SECTION V. — ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE REASONING 
 POWERS. 
 
 It is appropriate to close this chapter with a few sugges- 
 tions on the manner of improving the reasoning powers. 
 
 If the remarks in the preceding pages are correct, it will 
 appear that the process which we employ in reasoning is, in 
 all cases, essentially the same. Our object is to show such 
 a relation between the known and the unknown, that, if one 
 ©e true, the other is equally true ; or, if one be only prob- 
 able, the other is equally probable. If our premises are 
 ienied, we proceed to show their relation to something bet- 
 ter known and more universally admitted, and thus fall 
 back, step by step, until we rest upon those elementary 
 truths which are given us in the constitution of the human 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF REASONINd. 341 
 
 rntelbct. From these, i^ the first place, all our KnoTvle-ig<« 
 proceeds. 
 
 The manner in which we accomplish this is by syllogism. 
 We show that what is true of a class is true of every indi- 
 vidual under that class By making it evident that indi- 
 viduals or species are included under classes to which they 
 ■were not supposed to belong, or that a predicate can be 
 affirmed of a subject which could not have been affirmed of 
 it before, new knowledge is evolved, and the domain of 
 Bcience is enlarged. 
 
 To proceed in this manner is, I suppose, the instinct of 
 our nature. A human being begins to reason almost as 
 Boon as he begins to think ; and were he incapable of 
 reasoning, that is, of inferring a conclusion from premises, 
 •we should at once perceive that he was destitute of a ra- 
 tional soul, or deficient in an important element of our in- 
 tellectual nature. Logicians unfold the process and develop 
 the laws by which reasoning is performed, and thus enable 
 us the better to distinguish between valid arguments and 
 sophisms. To be able to do this is of great utility in the 
 ^ork of mental cultivation. AVe thus are rendered capable 
 of determining whether our reasonings are, or are not, in 
 accordance with the laws of the human mind. When this 
 attainment has been made, we can rely with confidence upon 
 the decisions of our own understanding. This is an impor- 
 tant condition of all intellectual progress. We can never 
 proceed boldly in the work of investigation, until wc can 
 say, with Sir Isaac Newton, "When I see a thing to be 
 true, I know it is true." 
 
 If, then, we would cultivate our reasoning power with 
 ijccess, it is important to understand the nature of the 
 human mind, and especially the process by which it estab- 
 lishes truth by reasoning. The first of these is treate<l of 
 in works on intellectual philosophy This, however, is not 
 29* 
 
642 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHT. 
 
 alone su^.ncnt for our purpose Tlie T\liole sulvjoct of 
 reasonip/ _ in all its ramifications, is unfolded in the science 
 of logi' . By a diligent study of this science, our acute- 
 ness .ill be greatly sharpened, and, what is probably of 
 greater conse([uence, the mind not only becomes accustomed 
 to all the forms of reasoning, but learns instinctively to 
 reject every conclusion not warranted by logical principles. 
 
 I lately met with the following curious illustration of 
 'he utility of the study o" logic in cultivating the power 
 ^f the mind : 
 
 " The Asiatic Journal, 1827, records the following 
 instance of acuteness in a young brahmin. After the 
 introduction of juries into Ceylon, a wealthy brahmin, 
 whose unpopular character had rendered him obnoxious to 
 many, was accused of murdering his nephew, and put upon 
 trial. He chose a jury of his own caste ; but so strong waa 
 the evidence against him, that twelve out of thirteen of the 
 jury were thoroughly convinced of his guilt. The dissen- 
 tient juror, a young brihrain of Camisseram, stood up, de- 
 clared his conviction that the prisoner was the victim of a 
 conspiracy, and desired that all the witnesses should be 
 /ecalhd. He examined them with extraordinary dexterity 
 and acuteness, and succeedecl in extorting from them such 
 proofs of their perjury, that the jury, instead of consigning 
 the prisoner to an ignominious death, pronounced him inno- 
 cent. The affair made much noise in the island, and the 
 cliiefjustice, Sir Alexander Johnston, sent for the juror who 
 had oD distinguished himself, and complimented him on thp 
 talents he had displayed. The brahmin attributed his skill 
 CO the study of a book which he called ' The Strengthener 
 oi the Mind.' He had obtained it from Persia, and had 
 translated it from the Sanscrit, into which it had been ren- 
 dered from the Persian. Sir Alexander Johnston express- 
 ing a curiosity to see the book, the brahmin brought a Tamil 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF REASOXINQ. 843 
 
 manuscript, on palm leases, which Sir Alexander found, to 
 bis infinite surprise, to be the ' Dialectics of Aristotle.' " 1 
 regret that I am not able to verify this anecdote by a refer- 
 ence to the original work. I give it as I found it in a 
 periodical on education. 
 
 The study of rules and the comprehension of priiciplaa 
 will, however, be of very little value, unless our knowledge, 
 as we have before recommended, be reduced to practice. 
 By the habitual practice of earnest investigation, without 
 any knowledge of the rules of logic, a man will become an 
 able reasoner ; while, without this practice, no matter what 
 be his understanding of the rules, he will never acquire the 
 power of convincing othei'S. 
 
 2. I, therefore, remark that the power of ratiocination 
 may be improved by the study of works of a syllogistic 
 character. Among these, it is common to assign the first 
 place to the pure mathematics. A geometrical demonstra- 
 tion is composed of a succession of pure syllogisms, free 
 from any admixture of contingent truth, and receiving aa 
 premises only what every human mind must necessarily 
 admit. Tlie appeal is made exclusively to the understand- 
 ing ; the conceptions are definite and precise, and the con- 
 clusions follow from their own intuitive e\4dence. This, 
 then, would seem to present the simplest and purest exercise 
 of the reasoning power. For this cause, the mathematics 
 have always formed an important branch of a liberal educa- 
 tion. They give exercise to the reasoning power, and they 
 may be pursued at an early period of life, when other 
 reasoning could not be so easily comprehended. 
 
 On the use of the mathematics for the purpose of intel- 
 lectual cultivation, however, the highest authorities on tha 
 Bubject of education differ. Sir W. Hamilton * contends, 
 
 • On the Study of the Mathematics aa an Eierciseof the Mind.— Disciu 
 Bona on Phibbophy, etc. London, 1852 : pj . 256—327. 
 
B44 I>-TELLECTrAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 with great power and exuberance of learning, that thoy are, 
 of all intellectual pursuits, the least adapted to produce th« 
 effect .so commonly ascribed to them. It must be admitted 
 that they discuss the relations of nothing but quantity, and 
 the simplest of these relations : and that the matter of which 
 they treat, and the mode in which they treat it, are entirely 
 unlike those which must be employed in the affairs of life 
 and the mvestigations of the other sciences. Whoever will 
 read this very able discussion will at least be convinced 
 that the ordinary opinion on the nniversal adaptedness of the 
 mathematics to mental discipline requires a thorough reex- 
 amination. It is also a duty manifestly imposed upon 
 teachers to consider this question with a mind unbiased by 
 preconceived opinions, and observe carefully the effect of 
 this study on the reasoning powers of their pupils. In all 
 our institutions of learning we require that every candidate 
 for a literary degree shall devote a considerable portion of 
 his time to the mathematics, not for any practical purpose, 
 but purely as a means of special intellectual culture. It 
 surely cannot be inappropriate to inquire whether it actually 
 produces the anticipated results. 
 
 3. In the mathematics, our reasoning concerns nothing 
 but the necessary relations of quantity, and, therefore, we 
 arrive at absolute truth. A very small part of our practi- 
 cal reasoning is, however^ of that character. "We desire to 
 have the truth, not concerning abstract conceptions, but 
 concerning matters of fact, or that into which Hict enters as 
 a necessary element. Hence, were we to confine our reason- 
 ing tc the mathematics, it may be doubted whether we 
 should increase our power of general ratiocination. It has 
 been frequently remarked that pei^sons who have addicted 
 themselves exclusively to this science, have been singularly 
 deficient in the reasoning power which is required in the 
 leTcral profissions, and in the ordinary affairs of Ufa. I 
 
IMIROVEMENT OF REASON. 345 
 
 have not perceived that original ability in young men waa 
 at all measured by proficiency in the mathematics. Men 
 of decided talent generally succeed well in anything and, 
 of course, in abstract science. The general reasoning power 
 is not more closely connected with special talent for mathe- 
 matics, than with special talent for philology, philosophy, 
 physics, or any other branch of learning. 
 
 It will, tLirefore, be necessary for us to accustom our- 
 selves to reasonings concerning matters of fact, or, as it ia 
 called, moral reasoning. In order to do this, it will be use- 
 ful to examine argumentative treatises, discourses, sermons, 
 pleas at the bar, or anything which, by consecutive proof, 
 professes to arrive at a conclusion, I hardly know of any 
 ■work better adapted to such a purpose than Butler s Anal 
 ogy. It will aid us in this labor, first, carefully to read 
 the work which we attempt to examine, taking notes of 
 every step of the argument, and thus, in the briefest manner, 
 forming for ourselves an analysis of the whole. Then, fix- 
 ing our minds distinctly upon the thing to be proved, we 
 should examine the general syllogism by which it is es- 
 tablished, and the proofs on which the several propositiong 
 rest. Where an argument is abbreviated, we should supply 
 the propositions that are suppressed, and the conclusions that 
 arc omitted. In this manner we shall be able fully to ap- 
 preciate the value of the whole argument, yielding an intel- 
 ligent conviction to its proofs, and rejecting whatever i3 
 sophistical. A practice of this kind will have a maiked 
 effect upon our power of ratiocination. 
 
 By pursuing the course here indicated, we may be enabled 
 I) understand, appreciate and verify, the various forms of 
 •irgament. "We thus become skilful in detecting sophistry 
 and distinguishing truth from falsehood. This may be termed 
 passive syllogistic power. It is an important preparation 
 for further progress, but is in itself only a partial deveJop- 
 
S46 IliTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 ment of tho reasoning faculty. We need the aoility, no! 
 only to understiind and appreciate the arguments of others, 
 but also to originate and construct arguments for ourselves. 
 This is the great purpose which this power was intended ic 
 accomplish. 
 
 4. We may improve ourselves in this respect by mathe- 
 matical study. As soon as we have acquired the command 
 of a few theorems in geometry, we should attempt to demon- 
 strate for ourselves. Problems for this purpose should be 
 provided in our text-books. It would be well if the student 
 should never make use of the demonstration in the book, 
 until he had exhausted his ability to originate one for him- 
 self In this manner, though he might seem at first to 
 make but slow progress, his real mathematical power would 
 rapidly increase. If mathematical studies are to be used aa 
 a means for mental discipline, the practice of original demon- 
 stration must be invaluable. Were it more frequently 
 adopted, I have no doubt that it would add materially to 
 vigor and alertness of mind. In this respect, algebraical 
 problems possess a peculiar advantage. °I know of no ex- 
 ercise that calls into more active use the power of grasping 
 firuly a particular conception, and tracing it out unchanged 
 tlirough various and complicated relations, than the eflFort to 
 form a difficult algebraical equation. 
 
 5. If we would educate our reasoning powers, we must 
 pursue the same course in subjects not mathematical. We 
 must learn to form arguments for ourselves on all matters 
 of investigation that come under our notice. When a doubt- 
 ful question arises, instead of avoiding it, we should earnestly 
 bciid ourselves to the labor of solving it. We should be in 
 the habit of forming logical plans of thought on every sub- 
 ject of study. Whether we write or speak, we siiould always 
 have an end in view, towards which every thought tends by a 
 aatural succession, and a logical arrangement. If a lawyei 
 
IMPROVEMENT Of" REASON. 347 
 
 makes a plea, he should not be satisfied with merely pre- 
 senting a variety of considerations that have a bearing OD 
 the subject; his argument should be direct and conclusive. 
 If a preacher construct a discourse, he should have in view 
 a particular moral condition to which he desires to lead hia 
 audience, and every paragraph and every sentence should 
 tend to lead them to this condition. 
 
 If, however, we desire to cultivate our intellect to the 
 best advantage, two cautions are here to be observed. Th« 
 first respects reliance on authority. Many men, when a 
 proposition is to be proved, spend their time in hunting up 
 authorities, and collecting the opinions of others. By these 
 they expect mon to be convinced, without once asking the 
 question whether they are convinced themselves. I would 
 by no means speak lightly of the learning of the past, or 
 of the opinions of eminent men ; but it must still be apparent 
 that an opinion, whether of an ancient or a contemporary, 
 is worth just as much as the reason on which it is founded 
 No matter how high the authority, we should never attempt 
 to convince another by an argument the force of which we 
 have not ourselves acknowledged. We may embarrass and 
 confound men by an array of learned authorities, but we 
 shall rarely convince them unless we have first convinced 
 ourselves. 
 
 But it is hardly enough that we ourselves be convinced 
 by the teaching of others. We should, if possible, convince 
 oui-selves by reasons drawn from the fountain of our own 
 reflections. A student who desires to develop fully his own 
 powers, must make his own mind his chief reliance in all 
 his intellectual labor. If he cultivate this habit, he will 
 Ge^iuently find it less laborious to think out an argument 
 for himself than to seek for it in books. A man endowed 
 with a ready memory and sufficieut command of language, 
 Dtay, without any active use of his reasoning powers, speak 
 
Ml INTEL,i^fiCTUAL PHILOSOPHT 
 
 cr write upon a subject -with fluency and elegance. Snch 
 men in youth create great expectation, but when the boui 
 arrives for decided intellectual trial, they fail. On the 
 other hand, he who thinks for himself and relies on his own 
 resources, may at first seem slow of apprehension and want- 
 ing in richness of thought, but his powers are invigorated 
 by every effort. The exercise of his faculties yields con- 
 tinually a richer and more abundant product, and thus con- 
 firms his confidence in his own intellectual power. We 
 should, therefore, resolve in the beginning that whatever we 
 produce shall be, as far as possible, our own ; at least, that 
 it shall have passed through the processes of our own think- 
 ing, and thus become assimilated with the working of (ur 
 own intellect. No habit is so fatal as plagiarism to all 
 vigor of the understanding. It inevitably induces indolence, 
 mental imbecility, and utter inability to carry on a train 
 of original thought. 
 
 6. In order to improve the reasoning powers, it is im- 
 portant that we always labor for truth. Many persons, in 
 order to acquire skill in debate, are in the habit of defend- 
 ing the true or false indiscriminately, believing that they 
 can cultivate their own understanding by misleading the 
 understinding of others. A man may learn thus to embar- 
 rass and confound an antagonist, but he does it at great 
 sacrifice. By earnestly seeking for truth, and rejecting all 
 sophistry, the mind acquires a tendency to move in the right 
 direction. Chemists sgeak much of the affinities of varioua 
 substances for each other. There is a natural affinity in 
 the human mind for truth, and this affinity is strengthened 
 by seeking for it with an honest and earnest purpose. If 
 we in our investigations inquire for nothing but truth, it 
 spontaneously reveals itself to us. The Avhole history of 
 philosophical discovery illustrates this remark. Hence 
 nothing can be more unwise than to destrov the originaj 
 
IMPRCVEMENT OF REASON. 849 
 
 delicacy of ,h3 faculty of reason by employing it iudis- 
 criininatcly in the support of truth or falsehood. We ma^ 
 thus gain the praise of acuteness or readiness in debate; 
 but Ave lose what is of incomparably greater consequence, 
 the instinctive love of truth, and the delicate discrimina 
 tioD between truth and error. 
 
 And, lastly; it is impossible for us to reason well, or 
 80 to reason as to increase the sum of human knowledge, 
 ■without the possession of large and accurate knowledge. 
 Reasoning is the process by which we pass from the 
 known to the unknown. The known, then, lies at the 
 foundation of our process. Unless there be something 
 known, we cannot begin to reason ; and the greater the 
 amount of our knowledge, the larger is the material 
 with which we labor. The more exact our knowledge is, 
 the more successfully can we use .\t in the discovery of 
 truth. 
 
 Al'^e men, of marked independence of mind, and strong 
 tendency for investigation, by failing to know what other 
 men have discovered, are liable to waste their energies in 
 search of that which has been already discovered. Hence, 
 after arriving at valuable truth, they find themselves 
 in the rear of their age. Though the cases are rare, 
 able men sometimes fall into this error. If this be the 
 case witli men of unusual endowments, how much more 
 does it deserve the attention of those who can boast of 
 no extraordinary talent ! He who would enlarge the field 
 of human knowledge, must stand upon the limits cf tlio 
 known, before he can expect to enter the field of the 
 unknown. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Cultivation of the reasoning fiiculties — Abercrombie, Part 3, section 4 
 Mathematicians not good reasoners — Abercrombie, Part 3, seciifin 4 
 
 SO 
 
S50 KTTEl.iECTUAL PHI. OSOPHY. 
 
 Difference between sound judgment and ingenious disputation — Abep 
 crorabie, Part S, section 4. 
 
 Power of rcixsoning depends on extent of knowledge — Aberciombie 
 Part 3, section 4. 
 
 Use of authorities — Locke, Book 4, chap. 20, section 17. 
 
 Advantage of cleanie^s aod exactitude of knowledge — Locke , Book 4 
 Bh*p. 12, notioB li. 
 
OEAPTER Vn 
 
 IMAGINATION 
 
 SECTION I. — THE NATURE OF THIS FACULTT 
 
 TuE next faculty of which we propose to treat is tU« 
 Lwagination. It is the power by which, from simple con« 
 cevtions already existing in the mind, we form complex 
 vlMles or images. Thus, the painter, selecting several beau- 
 tiful views from various landscapes which he has observed, 
 forms them into a snigle picture. The novelist unites the 
 elemonts of several characters which he has observed in the 
 conc'-ption of his hero. 
 
 It is manifest that some form of abstraction must, by 
 necessity, precede the exercise of imagination. Were we 
 not able to analyze the concrete, and contemplate its several 
 parts separate from each other, we could never unite them 
 at will, so as to form an original image. The parts must 
 be mentally severed before they can be reunited in a ne\y 
 conception. It is this power of reuniting the several 
 elements of a conception at will, that is. properly, imagina- 
 ijon. Imagination may then be designated as the power of 
 WUibination. 
 
 Thei-e is, however, a difference in the manner in which 
 the power of combination receives and modifies the materials 
 derived from abstraction In treating of abstraction I 
 attempted to show that it included tlu-ee acts; first, analy 
 
352 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPUT. 
 
 sis, by which the qualities of a concrete object ire separated 
 from each other ; second, generalization, by which these 
 simple elements of an individual become a general abstract 
 idea ; and, third, combination, by which these last are united 
 in a complex conception, representing not an individual 
 but a class. The act by which we form classes, may. 
 perhaps, more propoily be called conception than imagina- 
 tion. 
 
 The act of imagination proper, differs from that act by 
 •which we form classes. In the first place, the mode of 
 abstraction in the two cases is unlike. In forming concep- 
 tions of classes we first separate qualities from each other 
 In collecting the elements for a picture in the imagination, 
 we separate not qualities so much as parts. Again ; before 
 we can proceed to form classes, we must first generalize our 
 individual abstractions, and thus form general abstract ideas. 
 In imagination proper we do not genei'alize, but at once 
 unite the ideas of individual parts which we have previously 
 separated from each other. In the third place, the result 
 is dissimilar. In the one- case we form a notion of a class, 
 meaning no particular individual ; in the other, we form a 
 notion of an individual, which is the more perfect in pro- 
 portion to its distinct individuality. 
 
 The difference between these cases may be illustrated bj 
 a familiar example. Suppose that a physiologist wero 
 attempting to form a scientific conception of an animal, say, 
 for instance, of a horse. He would examine the first speci- 
 men with all the accuracy in his power, taking note 
 Bpecially of all the qualities of its external appearance and 
 internal structure. He would, in the second place, ( xamine 
 otlier specimens, taking note of each particular quality aa 
 before. These qualities would then not belong to one speci- 
 men, but to them all, or would become general abstract 
 ideas. lie would next distinguish those that were constan* 
 
IMAGTNATICS OlZ 
 
 from those wliich uere variable, uniting tlie constant intc 
 a single conception, and rejecting the others as valueless 
 This conception thus formed would represent the class, and 
 would correspond to the word horse, whenever he or ^thex 
 physiologists used it. 
 
 But, were an artist required to paint the charger of a com- 
 cander-in-chief on a battle-field, he would proceed in a very 
 different manner. Observing several horses, he would per- 
 ceive one remarkable for the beauty of its head. The body 
 of another, and the neck of a third are distinguished for 
 elegance of form and symmetry of proportions. Without 
 any act of generalization, he would unite such of these sev- 
 eral parts as he chose into one image, which he would 
 transfer to the canvas. This picture would not be the 
 representition of a chiss. but of an indindual. The object 
 of the painter would be, not to form an image which should 
 stand for all horses, but a picture of a more beautiful horse 
 than had ever existed, thus making this representation to 
 stand out by itself, distinguished from every other that had 
 ever been conceived. 
 
 Imagination proper is, therefore, the power of forming 
 not general conceptions, designating classes, but particular 
 images representing indiN-iduals. It is the power by which 
 •we form pictures in the mind, of some object or event. 
 Hence, it would seem that those writers have erred who 
 Btate that this act of the mind closely resembles the process 
 of reasoning. The two acts are really remarkably unlike. 
 The materials used in the reasoning process are always 
 propositions, that is, affirmations respecting genera and 
 Bpecies. The imagination, on the contrary, employs con- 
 cepiions of sepamte parts, which it combines into an indi- 
 vidual whole. The process which they employ is dissimilar; 
 the one forming syllogisms, the other uniting elements. Tha 
 result at which they arrive is different. The one ends ic 
 SO* 
 
B54 nn:ELLEC^*UAL philosophy. 
 
 a proposition affirming a predicate of a subject; die other "nd* 
 in a picture affirming nothing. The one asserts a tiuth, 
 the other presents a conception. That the most gifted men 
 are frequently endowed vith both of these powers in a high 
 -ieirree, and that the possession of both is necessary to gieat 
 intellectual effi)rts, is granted : but this no more proves 
 them to be either identical or similar, than the necessity of 
 reason and memory to intellectual effort proves these faculties 
 identical. 
 
 If we examine the several acts of this faculty, we may, 
 I think, observe a difference between them. We have the 
 power to oiiginate images or pictures for ourselves, and we 
 have the power to form them as they are presented to us in 
 language. Tiie former may be called active, and the lattei 
 passive imagination. The active I believe always includes 
 the passive power, but the passive does not always include 
 the active. Thus we frequently observe persons, who delight 
 in poetry and romance, who are utterly incapable of creat- 
 ing a scene or composing a stanza. They can fdlm the pic- 
 tures dictiited by language, but are destitute of the pc Aer 
 of original combination. Even this secondary and inferior 
 form of imagination is possessed in different degrees. Every 
 one in the habit of giving instruction, especially when de- 
 scription is necessary, must have been convinced of the great 
 difference of individuals in this respect. Some persona 
 create a picture for themselves as soon as it is presented in 
 language. Others form it with difficulty, after rej^eated 
 trials ; and at last we are uncertain whether the conception 
 in our own mind is the same as that awakened in the mind 
 of another. It is on this power, chiefly, that the love of 
 jO€try and fiction depends. Hence, we frequently find per- 
 Rcns of good sense and strong judgment, who never manifest 
 any taste for imaginative writing. This type of chartiCtei 
 »8 most frequently observed in those who have not com 
 
lilAGINATION. 
 
 855 
 
 uieucctl their education until late in life. The ima,^niatitu 
 is most active in youth, and if it remain umleveloped until 
 the period of youth be past, it rarely attains its full power 
 or its natural proportions. 
 
 The active power Df imagining Is bestowed wiih still 
 greater diversity. Some men aie poets by nature, llcnce 
 the maxim, pacta uascitur Jioii Jit, — a poet is formal bv 
 nature, not by education. Men endowed with a creative 
 imagination are continually perceiving analogies, foiming 
 comparisons, and originating scenes of beauty or grandeur, 
 out of all that they observe and all that they remember. 
 Johnson was sitting one evening by the side of a table, on 
 which two candles were burning. The conversation turned 
 on Thomson. "Thomson," said be, "could not see 
 those two candles without forming a poetical image out of 
 them." On the other hand, we are told of a celebrated 
 mathematician, who, after reading the Paradise Lost, laid 
 down the book in disgust, with the significant question, 
 " What does it prove 1 " In the one case, the imagination 
 had been exclusively cultivated ; in the otlier, the reasoning 
 power. The one ha4 been accustomed to form pictures, the 
 other demonstrations. Nei:her could have been interested 
 in the labors of the other. Both would probably have 
 derived advantages from a more generous and universal cul- 
 tivation of their intellectual powers. 
 
 This distinction leads us to observe a mistake, frequently 
 made, respecting the mode of cultivating the imagination. 
 Young persons sometimes spend their time in reading works 
 sf fiction, and tell us that their object is to improve this 
 power of the mind. This kind of reading produces an effect, 
 but not the effect intended. It improves nothing but the 
 passive f)Ower of the imagination ; that is, it enables us the 
 more readily to conceive of scenes presented to us by laa 
 guage. It cannot enable us to create scenes for ourselve* 
 
256 
 
 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 If this passive imaginative power is exclusively cultivate.;!, 
 it is even liablj to paralyze the power of creation by con- 
 demning it to perpetual inaction. Sir Walter Scott was, 
 from boyhood, a vast reader of romances, but he was also 
 an indefatigable story-teller, and would detain his school- 
 fellows, by the half-day together, with fictions of his c wn 
 creation, wrought out on the instant from the stores of hia 
 inexhaustible fancy. 
 
 Again ; a distinction may be observed in the nature of the 
 active power of the imagination. Some men instinctively 
 employ this faculty in the creation of images of beauty or 
 sublimity. They address themselves to the taste, and their 
 object is merely to please. Such men are by nature poets 
 Whatever they see or hear becomes at once materials for the 
 exercise of the fancy. Analogies between the seen and the 
 unseen, the relations of matter and the relations of mind, 
 the objective and the subjective, are continually revealing 
 themselves, and thus giving birth to comparisons, meta- 
 phors, similes and pictures. No one can read the poetiy of 
 Milton, Shakspeare, Burns, Cowper and Thomson, with- 
 out observing this wonderful power of creating at will 
 images of transcendent loveliness, from either the lowliest 
 n the loftiest object that the eye rests upon. 
 
 But there is another and a smaller class of persons, richly 
 endowed with imagination, in whom this faculty acts on 
 Bomewhat different principles, and tends to a very different 
 result. The materials which they employ are not scenes, 
 or images of individual beauty, but laws of nature. They 
 address not the taste, but the reason. Their object is not 
 to please, but to instruct. The result at which they arrive 
 is not a picture that can be painted on canvas, but a complex 
 zonception of truth united in one idea, and tending to a par- 
 ticular conclusion. Such men no sooner observe a phenomo 
 aon than they summon from the whole field of their knowledge 
 
POETIC IMAGINATION. do i 
 
 every law :hat could relate to this particular case, and se- 
 lect and combine into one conception such of these lav>s aa 
 will reasonably account for the change. Most men, when 
 they observe a phenomenon, know that it must have i cause, 
 but never give themselves the trouble to seek for it. Othera 
 are perpetually searching after causes, but seem condemned 
 to search forever in the wrong direction. Men ^^ho are 
 preeminently gifted are generally endowed with this power 
 of combination in a remarkable degree. Such were Ar- 
 chimedes, Plato and Aristotle, among the ancients, and 
 among the moderns, Newton, Sir H. Davy, Cuvier, and 
 many of the illustrious men yet spared to us. It has 
 appeared to me that the study of chemistry, when pursued 
 into the regions of original investigation, has a strong ten- 
 dency to cultivate the highest exercise of this endowment. 
 
 As these two forms of the imagination are of special 
 mterest, and are to a considerable degree dissimilar, we shall 
 in the following remarks consider them separately. 
 
 SECTION II. — POETIC IMAGINATION. 
 
 Imagination, as we have said, is the power of combina- 
 tion. In poetic imagination, its elements are not general 
 abstract ideas, but rather notions of the several parts of 
 diflferent wholes, which may be united at will. The pic- 
 tures of the imagination are not representations of classes, 
 but are individual images which the mind forms for itself 
 from the conceptions which it has already treasured up. 
 
 Thus, when a painter would delineate on canvas an ideal 
 landscape, he has rccoui-se to the various elements of pic- 
 turesiiue beauty which are present in his recollection. lie 
 Oaa been in the habit of observing the aspects of nature in 
 a<l their infinite variety Tree and shrub river and stream- 
 
858 IMEL12CTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 let. meadow and hill-side, sunlight and shadow, at moniirg 
 noon and evening, are all vividly impressed upon his recol- 
 lection. He forms, at first, a general conception of the picture 
 which he is about to execute. He forms, perhaps, another 
 and another, until the prominent features of his design are 
 determined upon. When the elements of his combination 
 are such as he approves, he proceeds to fill up the outline 
 with such of the accessories as will best harmonize with his 
 gubject. When his conception is thus matured, he proceeds 
 to give it form and coloring. The idea which at first ex- 
 isteil in his own mind alone, now begins to appear in all the 
 loveliness of a finished picture. It is said that Cole, the 
 distinguished American landscape painter, never drew a line 
 upon canvas until he had not only matured the whole scene in 
 his mind, but even written out the description in full. From 
 this written delineation he rarely made any variation when 
 he transfeiTcd his conception to canvas. The case is the 
 same in any other of the fine arts. One of the most im- 
 pressive ideas that crowds upon the spectator, as he, for the 
 first time, looks upon the interior of a gothic cathedral, is. 
 that all this magnificence of beauty, even to its minute 
 details, must have existed in the mind of the architect be- 
 fore the first stone of the mighty fabric was laid. It al^ 
 appears like a gorgeous epic, — an Iliad, or a Paradise Lost, 
 in stone. 
 
 In the preceding cases our design is simple. It u 
 merely to present a conception which shall awaken th* 
 emotion either of beauty or sublimity in the minds of our 
 t'ellow-men. Our labor is, in the fii-st place, purely concep- 
 tual. It consists in creating in our own minds a picture. 
 Suppose this to have been done ; the next step is to givo to 
 ihis conception some external expression, by which we stial] 
 transfer to the minds of v-iher men the very image w';ich 
 we have created in our own. Hence we see that tn»> eio 
 
POETIC IMAGINATION. 359 
 
 iBentS must be touibined in the character of an eminent 
 tatist. First, be must be endowed with a rich and vigorous 
 imagination, by which he may form beautiful and striking 
 conceptions ; and, secondly, he must be able to realize his 
 conceptions in some material form, so that they may create 
 their proper impression upon the minds of others. Articts 
 may fail from the want of either of these elements. If a 
 man be ever so highly gifted with imagination, but bo div 
 ficient in power of execution, unable to establish any mcilium 
 of communication between himself and other men, he will 
 be forever exposed to mortifying failure. He may speak or 
 lecture well on his art. but he can never become a success- 
 ful artist. Such was apparently the case with Ilaydon. On 
 the other hand, when imagination is wanting, the prac- 
 titioner may be a skilful copyist; if a painter, he may draw 
 with accuracy, or represent with fidelity, whatever he sees ; 
 but he can never attain to the highest conception of art. 
 
 The manner in which these two processes are united in 
 art is various. Sometimes, as I have before remarked, the 
 conception is elaborated and perfected in the mind, before it 
 receives any external expression. Gray's Elegy and Burns' 
 "Bruce's Aildress to his Soldiers," are said to have been 
 completed before a word was written. In other cases, 
 the rough draft is first committed to canvas, or written out 
 in woi-ds, and this is elaborated and modified, until it hnn 
 attained to all the perfection of which the author is capable 
 Milton was for many years engaged in the plan of Paradise 
 Lost, and there now exist in the Library of Trinity College, 
 Cambridge, his various drafts, approaching nearer to the 
 T)lan which he finally adopted. Which of these Diodes ia 
 to be prefen-ed must be left to the mental habits of the 
 artist. As a general rule, however, it may be remarked 
 that the more thoroughly any work is excogitated in the bo- 
 
360 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 ginning, the less will be the labor of composition, and th« 
 move marked and observable the symmetry of the whole. 
 
 But suppose that this firsi intellectual labor has been 
 accomplished, and a conception has been formed which we 
 d(sire to present to our fellow-men. What shape shall 
 this expression assume 7 The answer to this question will 
 itpend upon the endowments special to the individual 
 
 If this conception has been formed in a mind endowed 
 aimply with the power of language, it will be expressed in 
 prose. 
 
 Suppose, that, in addition to the power of language, an artist 
 possess also an ear for rhythm, he will express it in poetry. 
 
 If, on the other hand, he be endowed with the power of 
 delineating form, he will execute his conception in marble 
 or stone, and become a sculptor or an architect. 
 
 If he have the power of expression, not only in form, but 
 also in color, he will be a painter. 
 
 Thus, the fountain from which all the fine arts take their 
 rise is precisely the same. It is the power of creating in 
 our own minds images of beauty or sublimity. Hence 
 flow the various forms of art in the channels marked out by 
 our individual endowments. It is rare that an individual is 
 gifted with more than one of these modes of expression, 
 though, in highly favored instances, they are occasionally 
 combined. Michael Angelo was equally distinguished in 
 sculpture, painting and architecture ; and was, besides, no 
 mean poet. Washington Allston was both a painter and a 
 poet. [Such gifts are, however, uncommon, and success in 
 a smgie department may well satisfy the ambition of any 
 artist. 
 
 We see, then, the reason of the rule in rhetoric, that, in 
 crder to test the correctness of a metaphor, we should con- 
 ceive of it as represented on canvas. We here recognize 
 the principle that the spiritual part of the work is tlie same 
 
POETIC IMAGINATION. 361 
 
 m both modes of expression ; and we present it to tlie decis- 
 ion of taste, in any manner that will best display its form 
 and proportions. Thus, Hoi-ace correctly remarks, 
 
 " Pictoribus atque poetis, 
 Quidlibet audendi semper fuit asqua potestas." 
 
 Hence a conception expressed in any one of the fine arts 
 is readily transferred to the other, A group in painting is 
 easily rendered in marble. Either of these also furnishes 
 Bubjects for poetry, while the conceptions of Shakspeare, 
 Milton, Scott and Bunyan, have supplied inexhaustible ma- 
 terials for the painter and engraver. 
 
 The relation of poetic imagination to taste is easily ex- 
 plained. By the imagination we create pictures in the 
 recesses of our own consciousness By poetry, painting, 
 sculpture, and the other fine arts, we give to our concep- 
 tions an outward manifestation. By this outward manifes- 
 tation we transfer our own concentions to the minds of other 
 men. They, by the passive power of the imagination, form 
 for themselves the image which we represent. Hence, the 
 imagination in us, addresses first the imagination of others. 
 But this is not its ultimate object. Its design is to please 
 the taste. Unless the emotion of beauty or sublimity is 
 awakened, we fail to accomplish our object. If we do not 
 form an impressive manifestation of our own conception, it 
 will fail to create a corresponding conception in other men. 
 After the conception has been awakened, if they look upon 
 it with disgust or indifference, our labor has been thrown 
 away. We see, therefore, that in order to form the charac- 
 ter of a finished artist, there must be combined great vigor 
 of iraaginatiofi, and great delicacy ot taste. The author 
 must be able instinctively to determine whether liis concep- 
 tion is really beautiful, that is, whether it will give pleas- 
 ure to the universal mind of man. 
 31 
 
362 INTELLECTUAii PHILOSOPIIT. 
 
 When taste is deficient and the imagination rigoious, « 
 writer or artist will abound iu conceptions ; but thc^j will ba 
 puerile, :aean disgusting, unnatural or misplaced ; )r, what 
 is perhaps more common, beauty and deformity wij} bo 
 Btrangelj and unaccountably mingled together. In such a 
 case, the world sometimes passes them by in silence, some- 
 times overwhelms them with ridicule ; or, provided the fol- 
 lies and eccentricities are strongly marked, at first it gazea 
 upon them with wonder, then applauds them as original, 
 and then consigns them to oblivion. In the words o*" 
 Horace : 
 
 •* Humano capiti cervicem pictor equinam 
 Jungere si veiit, et varias inducere plumaa 
 Undique collatis membris, ut turpiter atrum 
 Desinet in piscem, mulier formosa superne, 
 Spectatum admissi risum teneatis, amici 
 Crediti, Pisones, isti tabulae fore librum 
 Persimilem, cujus, velut aegri somnia, vanas 
 Fingentur species, ut nee pes nee caput uni 
 Reddatur formae." 
 
 Ars Poetica, 1 — 9. 
 
 It 13 possible, however, that the cause of the failure of 
 an author, or of an artist, may be precisely the reverse. 
 His taste may be too far in advance of his contemporaries. 
 In this case they will derive no pleasure from his concep- 
 tions, be they ever so perfect, and his works will fall dead 
 from his hand, though ever so deserving of immortality. 
 Painters have perished from want, the least deserving of 
 whose pictures have since commanded a price which would 
 have rendered the artist opulent. The manuscript of 
 Paradise Lost was sold for five pounds; while, at pres- 
 ent, the annual profits from the sale of his work would have 
 been a fortune to the patriot-poet. The progress of taste 
 may thus create a demand for a work of the imagination, 
 which did not exist in the life-time of the artist Dr th9 
 
POETIC IMAGINATION. OOd 
 
 author. Iloraer is saM to have begged his bread while 
 living ; altliough, centuries after his death, seven of the 
 most illustrious cities contenJed for the honor of having 
 been his birth-place, 
 
 I have thus far treated of imagination as the power by 
 which we foru pictures at will. The object here is simple. 
 The combinations thus formed address themselves to the 
 taste. If thej give us pleasure nothing more is demande<l, 
 and our object has been attained. If the painter execute a 
 beai tiful picture, or the sculptor a beautiful statue, we ask 
 for nothing more. So, if the novelist or the descriptivo 
 poet present us with a succession of pleasing or exciting 
 scenes, they may be entirely successful. More commonly, 
 however, in writing, some other design is intermingled with 
 this. Thus, when in earnest composition, we desire tc 
 lead the mind of the reader to a given result, some moral or 
 intellectual idea, by the association of resemblance or con- 
 trast, suggests an event or object in nature or art to which 
 it is analogous. "We turn aside and form an image of the 
 Buggested idea. Here, however, our object is two-fold. To 
 introduce an image merely because it was beautiful, might 
 distract attention from the proper course of thought, and 
 thus interfere with our principal design. Besides being 
 beautiful, the image must illustrate and enforce the idea 
 which suggested it. WTien both of these objects are accom- 
 plished, the great end of this form of imagination is attiined, 
 and to attain it is one of the most diflBcult achievements in 
 literary labor. Those comparisons and metaphors wliich 
 spring so spontaneously from the subject, that it appears 
 impossible to have given utterance to the thought in any 
 other manner, while they irradiate it with brilliant and un- 
 expected light, have commonly been the result of intense 
 labor, and are the pi »duct of tb-2 most exquisite arL-iti^ 
 skill 
 
86* INTELLECTUAL PBILOSOPHT. 
 
 It may serve to illustrate this use of the imaginat/on if 
 we present a few examples. Moore, a writer of exuberant 
 fancy, hag occasion to allude to the fact, that the affections, 
 by their nature, demand an object on which they may lean, 
 and which they strive to appropriate to themselves. This 
 idea nat irally suggests the image of a vine, which can only 
 be sustained by entwinmg itself around a support. This 
 illustration, however, has been so often employed, that it 
 has become trite. The poet looking more narrowly upon 
 the object, observed that it clung to its support by mean3 
 of a tendril. Hence he elaborates the following beau- 
 tiful comparison : 
 
 •' The heart, like a tendril, accustomed to cling, 
 Let it grow where it will, cannot flourish alone. 
 But will lean to the loveliest nearest thing 
 
 It can twine with itself and make closer its own." 
 
 Burke visited Versailles very 30on after the marri ige of 
 Mario Antoinette. He saw what seemed the commencement 
 of a brilliant and happy career, herself the most remarkable 
 object in the court which she adorned. When, in his re- 
 marks on the French revolution, he had occasion to refer to 
 this event, her position suggested to his rich and poetic im- 
 agination the appearance of the morning star. His mind 
 turned at once towards the beautiful image, and he says, 
 "It is now sixteen or seventeen years sincf I saw the queen 
 of France, then the dauphiness, at Versailles ; and surely 
 never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, 
 a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, 
 decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began 
 to move in, ghttering like the morning star, full of life, and 
 iplendor, and joy." 
 
 Thus Longinus, when he is comparing the eloquence of 
 Ocraosthenes and Cicero, turns to nature for analogies 
 
POETIC IMAGINillON. b83 
 
 Bj two very striking images he gives us an impression of 
 the peculiar character of each, beyond the power of anj 
 mere description. He compares the one to the thunderbolt, 
 which by a single stroke, scatters in splinters the giant oak 
 leaving a second stroke superfluous ; the other to a con- 
 flagration in a forest, spreading on every side irresistible 
 destruction, furnishing for itself the material which it con- 
 sumes, and gaining breadth and intensity at every step of 
 it? progress. 
 
 In these cases a two-fold object is accomplished. In the 
 first place a new and beautiful image is introduced, to which 
 the mind recurs w ith pleasure ; and, secondly, the original 
 idea is rendered vastly more definite and impressive. In 
 this manner we render taste and imagination subservient to 
 reason. We convince men, and make them pleased to be 
 convinced, and thus rarely fail of success. 
 
 In the above instances it will be perceived that a visible 
 image is presented to the mind, numerically distinct from 
 the idea to which it owes its origin. In many cases, how- 
 ever, this is not done. The image is only casually and for 
 a moment present to the mind of the writer, yet its presence 
 suggests the use of words which belong rather to it than to 
 tlie principal thought. Thus, he who resists successfully a 
 host of enemies, naturally suggests the idea of a man making 
 headway against a violent stream. We do not, however, 
 introduce the image, but only use terms suggested by it, and 
 Bay, he stemmed the torrent of opposition. When we think 
 of the origin of our nation, its struggles with the a1x)rigines, 
 ita exposure fur y( ars to universal destruction, we are natu- 
 rally led to think of a tree just planted, which any hand 
 may pluck, up; or of childhood, which, in its helplessness, 
 any assailant may overcome. We do not express the image 
 in full, but its presence renders it almost impossible for ug 
 to speak uj>on the subject without employing the terms.-- 
 31* 
 
5C6 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 '•' the germ of a nation."' " the plantin;^ of a people." " the 
 infancy of the republic,'" etc. So, when we reflect upon 
 the progress of a great truth, first discovered bj a retired 
 philosoplier, then modestly brought to the notice of the woild, 
 retciviug testimony from kindred sciences, until, gaining 
 strength at every step, it is universally acknowledged, we 
 naturallv think of a spring, which, rising in the recesses 
 yf the m mntains. receives tributaries on every side, until it 
 gradually- spreads out into a mighty river. Hence, we 
 Bpeak of "ascending to the fountain head of knowledge," 
 of " the current of opinions," of " a flood of evidence," and 
 the like. Instances of this kind are found in abundance in 
 the books on rhetoric. 
 
 There is another relation, somewhat different from the 
 above, in which the imagination stands to the art of per- 
 suasion. By the imagination we form pictures of objects, 
 scenes, events, characters, and the like. It is a well- 
 known fact that our emotions are excited as truly by a con- 
 ception as by the reality. We are moved by the incidentg 
 of a romance, we love one fictitious character and hate 
 another, we grieve over the distresses of virtue, we rejoice in 
 *,he punishment of crime, just as though what we read were 
 veritable narrative. And this effect is produced by the con- 
 ceptions themselves, for our emotions are not quelled even by 
 the reflection that all this is fiction. In this manner, the 
 imagination may be made to address our domestic affections, 
 our passions, — worthy or unworthy, — our conscience, or our 
 piety. Thus, tlie inimitable parables of our Saviour convey 
 ihe most sublime and touching lessons of universal truth. 
 The allegory of Bunyan overflows with religious instruction, 
 and exquisite moral sentiment. Homer has instilled into 
 the bosom of millions besides Alexander, the love of war, 
 and the inextinguishable thii-st for glory. We thus per* 
 seive that the passions ani .lentiments of mankind, eithei 
 
POETIC IMAGI5ATI0:jf. 367 
 
 fur good or for evil, are greatlj under tlie power of the 
 imagination. 
 
 The manner in wliicli the orator avails himself of thia 
 principle is the following. In the attempt to convince men 
 our first appeal is to their reason. We construct a train of 
 argument which proves our propositions to be true, and we 
 present such motives as should iniuce them to act in the 
 •Banner we desire. If we are deeply in earnest ourselves, 
 our earnestness will not fail to call into exercise every 
 power of the mind. Notions of things material and imma- 
 terial, visible and invisible, related to our subject by all the 
 laws of objective or subjective association, Avill with various 
 degrees of distinctness rise before us. These various mate- 
 rials the orator uses in such manner as he perceives best 
 adapted to accomplish his purpose. In the words of Shak- 
 Bpeare, 
 
 " The poet's eye, iu a fine frenzy rolling. 
 Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven : 
 And, as imagination Wiies forth 
 The forms of things unknown, the poet's pen 
 Turns them to shape, and gives to airy nothings 
 A local habitation and a name." 
 
 MiD-scMMEE Night's Dbeam. 
 
 When an image, a picture, or an event, presents itself to 
 the imagination of the orator, better adapted to excite the 
 emotion which he wishes to arouse than the naked statement 
 of his argument, he spreads this picture before the mind 
 with all the graphic power of which he is capable. We are, 
 Bs I have said, affected by conceptions as truly as by reality. 
 The emotion excited by the accessory is readily transferred 
 to the principal idea, and thus we are sunk in sadness, 
 melted into compassion, aroused to indignation, or inflamed 
 to patriotism, as we listen to the earnest appeals of impas- 
 lioued eloquence. It is by this combination of the reasoning 
 
fUi^ INTIL-KCTCAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 power with the imaginatioD tliat the greatest triuin]ili9 of 
 the art of j»en»U!isiun have bocn uccon»plisht\l. 
 
 Sofuetirues the inuiginuticn personifies on nitstract princi> 
 pie. an<l, nvesting it with every eleuicnt of gnuidcur and 
 Buhliiiiity, awakens cinotioii which la at once tnu^fcrreil to 
 the principle it'^.-lf. Curran, in his ilefrnce of Uowun, — 
 the luul lieen iiulicteil for thepul»licatittn of a pajx*r in which 
 he picaileil for universal enKUici|>atioii, — afliiuis that hif 
 client hail claimeil notliin;; uiorc tiiun was the hirtiiright of 
 every Kn^lisluuan, and that universal emancipation is on 
 eswential element of the Hritish Conntitulion. His imagina- 
 iioD, fired with so uohlc a llieme. at once conceives of uni- 
 Tersal euianci|)ation as the genius presiding over British 
 ■oil, oitd he pnx'ectU to clothe this being with ev«'ry attri- 
 bute of niijesty. thus transferring to the principle wliith lie 
 defends, the HuMime emotions which hU conception has in- 
 •pire«l. " I s|v»k in the spirit of British law, which makes 
 liberty couimeiuHuratc witii and inse)xirahle (\v\u the British 
 •oil, which proclaims even to the stranger and the sojourner, 
 the moment he sets his foot on British earth, that the soil 
 on which ho trea«U » holy, and conHccruteil hy the genius of 
 univors;d enian<'ifMtion. No matter in what language hii 
 doom nuiy have U-en pronounce»l ; no matter what complex- 
 ion im-tMupatihle with fnxHlom an In<lian or an Afriwm sun 
 may have hurmtl up<>n him; no matter in what discistrous 
 battle hi.H lil)ertics may have Wn cloven down ; no matter 
 with what «olemnitii*s he nmy have Iteen devoteil on the altar 
 of slavery, — the nv»ment he touches the 8acre<l soil of 
 Britain, the altar and the gM sink together in the dust, 
 IiIh tko\i\ walks a!>ni!id in her own m.njesty, his lody swelli 
 b«>vond tlie mea-Hure of the chains that hurst from around 
 kim. and ho stands riMlocnje«l, regener»te<l. and disenthralled, 
 *>V the irn-sistihle genius of univers:il cmancijwtion." Thi 
 itli-e| iif Kiuh A (-uiuvptiim ujxMi a hearer is obvious. He 
 
romc iMAfiisAnos. 
 
 M9 
 
 who before looked upon thj doctrine as roerelj a matter cf 
 3i>3tract right now jherishea it as a sublime aihi most c-uno* 
 bling sentiment and not onlj justiBes, but honors and ven« 
 erates the man who p:omulj;ates it 
 
 It is obvious that the same means maj be successfullj 
 used to arouse indignation against a person or an opinion. 
 The same great orator, wishing to discredit the testiroon/ 
 of a government witness, presents before us an image which 
 can awaken no emotion but those of loathsomeness and detes- 
 tation. Referring to the confinement of this person in the 
 Ca.'-tlebeforetht- trill. he stjles him •• the wretch that is buried 
 a man, who lies till his heart has time to fester and rot, and 
 is then dug up a witness." He asks. •• Have you not seen 
 him. after his rc-surrection from that tomb, after having been 
 dug out of the region of death and corruption, m-ike his 
 appearance upon the table, the living image of life and death, 
 and the supreme arbiter of both ? Hare you not marked, 
 when he entered, how the stormy wave of the multitude 
 retired at his approach ? Have jou not marked how the 
 human heart bowed to the supremacy of his f*ower, in the 
 undissembled homage of deferential horror / how his 
 glance, like the lightning of heaven. 8eeme<i to rive the Ixxly 
 of the accused and mark it for the grji\e, while his voice 
 warned the devoted wretch of woe and death, — a death 
 which no innocence can escape, no art elude, no force 
 resist, no antidote prevent? There was an antidote. — 
 a juror's oath; but even that adamantine chain, which 
 bound the integrity of man to the throne of eU-mal justice, 
 is sol ml and melted in the breath that issues from the in- 
 formers mouth. Con-science swings from her mooring*, 
 and the appalled and affrighted juror consults his own safet/ 
 in the surrender of the victim." 
 
 From such instances as these it is easy to perceive the 
 ittanner in which the orator may make even the imaginatinn 
 
870 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 to aid in the work of persuasion. He may bring the rjast 
 the present, and the future, before the mind of the hearer 
 and awaken, by means of it, any train of sympathy that he 
 desires. The pages of ancient and modern eloquence are 
 studded with gems of this kind, illustrating the power of 
 the consummate orator to wield the passions of men at hia 
 will, and too frequently, I Eiust confess, to make tho worse 
 appeal the better reason. 
 
 SECTION III. ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF POETIC IMAG- 
 INATION. 
 
 Imagination, as we have before said, is the power of 
 combination, — the faculty by which, out of materials 
 already existing in the mind, we form new and original im- 
 ages. Of course, our power of combination must be limited 
 by the amount of the materials on which it may be exerted. 
 Knowledge of all kinds is the treasury from which oui 
 power of combination must be supplied. The works of the 
 classical poets of all languages furnish us with a great variety 
 of beautiful imagery. But these poets themselves derived 
 their images from nature. The same book is open to us, and 
 we must study it for ourselves if we would attain to freshness 
 and vigor of imaginative power. He, therefore, who would 
 cultivate this faculty with success, must observe nature in 
 all her infinite variety of phases, by day and by night, in 
 sunshine and in storm, in summer and in winter, on tha 
 prairie and by the seaside, and delight himself in the beauti- 
 ful and the grand wherever they may exist in evei-y aspect 
 of creation around him. Says Imlac, in Rasselas, " I ranged 
 mountains and deserts for images and resemblances, and 
 pictured on my mind every tree of the forest and flc war of 
 
tTLTIVATIOX OF THE IMAGIXAriON. 071 
 
 the valley. I observed with equal care the crags of the 
 rxjk. and the pinnacles of the palace. Sonietiuies 1 wan- 
 dued along the mazes of the rivulet, and sometiuiea 
 ■natchcd tlie changes of the summer cloud. To a poet noth- 
 ing can be useless. Whatever is beautiful and whatever ig 
 dreadful must be familiar to his imagination; he must be 
 cmvei-sant with all that is awfully vast or elegantly little. 
 The plants of the garden and the animals of the wood, the 
 minerals of the earth and the meteors of the sky, must all 
 concur to store his mind with inexhaustible variety ; for 
 every idea is useful for the enforcement or decoration of 
 moral or religious truths, and he who knows most will have 
 most power of gratifying his reader with remote allusions 
 And unexpected instruction."' — Rasselas. chap. 10. 
 
 The habits of tiiose who have been most distinguished for 
 richness of imagination will, I believe, confirm th-e truth of 
 these remarks. Tiie poetry of Homer, Shakspeare and 
 Milton, is replete with images which could only have been 
 derived from close obserwition of nature, as she presented 
 herself to them in their dissimilar walks of life. But we 
 may recur to more recent instances. It is recorded of the 
 distinguished American, whose exquisite portraits of nature 
 have rendered classic the banks of the Hudson, that he once 
 mvited a friend to visit his " studies." He led him to some 
 of the mountaJDS that overlook his fiivorite river, and re- 
 marked that he was accustomed to spend whole days, from 
 Bunrise to sunset, in those majestic solitudes, observing the 
 never-ceasing changes wrought upon the scenery around 
 him in every hour of the day, and that thus he labored to 
 acquire a familiarity with every appearance of natural 
 beauty. The boundless range of the imagination of Sir 
 Walter Scott has been long acknowledged. Until, bow- 
 ever, his memoirs were published, n) one would have bf^ 
 lieved that he depended on minute observation for tha 
 
£572 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 materials of his fimcy. Before he wrote Rokeby, hu visit^Kl 
 his friend Mr. Morritt, in whose grounds the scene of the 
 poem was to be kid. "The Monday after his arrival, he 
 Baid. ' You have often given me the materials for a romance, 
 now I want a good robber's cave and an old church of the 
 right sort.' We rode out and found what he wanted in the 
 ancient slate quarry of Bignal, and the ruined abbey of 
 Eglinstone. I observed him noting down even the peculiar 
 little wild flowers and herbs that accidentally grew around 
 and on the side of a bold crag near his intended cave of 
 Guy Denzil, and could not help saying, that, as he Avas not 
 to be on his oath in this work, daisies, violets and primroses, 
 would be as poetic as any of the humble plants he was ex- 
 amining. I laughed, in short, at his scrupulousness ; but I 
 understood him when he replied that in nature herself no 
 two scenes were exactly alike, and that whoever copied truly 
 what was before his eyes, would possess the same variety in 
 bis descriptions, and exhibit, apparently, an imagination ag 
 boundless as the range of nature in the scenes which he 
 describes ; but whoever trusted to imagination, would soon 
 find his own mind circumscribed and contracted to a few 
 favorite images, and the repetition of these would soon pro- 
 duce that monotony and barrenness which have always 
 haunted descriptive poetry in the hands of any but the ya- 
 t'lent icorshipper of truth. 'Besides,' said he, 'local 
 names and peculiarities make a fictitious story look so much 
 better in the face.' In fact, he was but half satisfied with 
 the most beautiful scenery which he could not connect with 
 some local legend.^'' — Lockhart's Life of Scott, vol. 1, 
 cage 42G. 
 
 Nor was Sir Walter Scott a close observer of nature 
 merely ir the forms of inanimate creation. His amazing 
 power of delineating every variety of human character mai 
 'je traced to the same source. When " The Pirate" appeared 
 
IMPRUVEMENT OF THE IMAGINATION. 373 
 
 every >ne wondered at the fertile fancy of the Great Un- 
 known, and his power of conceiving so accurately ihe man- 
 ners, and even the modes of conversation of the people of 
 the Hebrides. Those, however, who had accompanied the 
 autiior in his visit to these regions, recognized in many of 
 the most striking passages of the novel an almost literal 
 record of the events which had transpired under their 
 own eyes. We thus perceive that the exhaustless richness 
 of the imagination of the great novelist was derived from 
 a remarkably exact observation of nature and mankind, 
 aided by a memory from which nothing seems to have 
 escaped that could minister to the success of his literary 
 labors. 
 
 It is related of Stothard, an eminent English artist, that 
 nothing could exceed the care with which he was in the 
 /labit of copying the minutest object in nature, in which he 
 detected any special beauty. '-He was beginning to paint 
 the figure of a reclining sylph, when a difficulty arose in his 
 mind how best to represent such a being of fancy. A friend 
 present said, ' Give the sylph a butterfly-wing, and then you 
 have it.' ' That I will," said Stothard, -and, to be correct, 
 I will paint the wing from the butterfly itself He instantly 
 sallied forth into the fields, caught one of these be;iutiful 
 insects, and sketched it immediately. * * He became 
 a hunter of butterflies. The more he caught, the greater 
 beauty did he trace in their infinite variety, and he would 
 often say that no one knew what he owed to these insects, — 
 they had taught him the finest combinations in that diflicult 
 branch of art, coloring. * * Whenever he was in the 
 ficldo, the sketch-book and the color-box were brought forth 
 frcm his pocket, and many a wild plaLt, with its de'ioata 
 formation of leaf and flower, was carefully copied on the 
 spot. The springing of the tendrils from the stem, and 
 every elegant bend and turn of the leaves, or the drocjiirig 
 32 
 
874 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 of a liell; was observed and depicted with tlie utmoal 
 beauty." He who observes nature in tliis manner will 
 never have occ;isiori to complain of deficiencj of materiala 
 for the use of the imagination. 
 
 2. It is evident, however, that the successful use of the 
 imagination does not depend merely upon our power to 
 form pictures. We must do more than this. To conceive 
 of a mountain more vast than another mountain mi^ht ba 
 considered an exercise of the imagination. But this would 
 excite no emotion either of novelty or sublimity. The 
 theogony of Boodhism is replete with conceptions of this 
 kind, but it awakens no other feeling than that of disgust. 
 If we hope to cultivate this faculty, we must acquire the 
 habit of associating the visible with the invisible, the mate- 
 rial with the spiritual. Had Goldsmith, in his celebrated 
 simile, compared the cliff to another cliff, or the village pas- 
 tor to another village pastor, his conception would have been 
 powerless, and would scarcely have escaped contempt. It 
 is the unexpected coincidence between a sublime object in 
 nature and the moral elements of a noble character, that 
 presents one of the finest images to be found in the English 
 language. "We must learn to associate these two classes of 
 objects together, so that, whatever be the point of observa- 
 tion which the mind occupies, it shall habitually seek for 
 appropriate analogies, and turn in the direction in which 
 they will most readily be found. Thus, it was remarked 
 above of Sir W. Scott, that "he was but half satisfied with 
 the most boautiful scenery which he did not connect with 
 8ome local legend.'' Thus, a poetic imagination instinctively 
 83es all things double, blending, in beautiful harmony, 
 thouglit, sentiment, subjective emotion, with whatever is mosl 
 analogous to it in the objective world of nature or art. 
 
 We may cultivate the imagination by studying atten* 
 tively works most distinguished for poetical combination 
 
IMPRCVEilENT OF THE IMAGINATION. 37£ 
 
 1 ^i\ gtudyin^; attentively, in distinction from the mere 
 cursoiy perusal of classical authors. ^Ye must not only 
 renl but meditate upon the beautiful and sublime ii> 
 tliou:2;ht, until wo feel the full force of every analogy ; en- 
 tering into the spiiit of the writer himself if we would 
 Rvail ourselves of the most successful ellbits of human 
 genius. We thus acquire the intellectual habits of the mas- 
 ters :f human thought. In the language of poetry, W8 
 catch a portion of their inspiration, instead of servilely ren- 
 dering their thoughts in oar own language. It is by the 
 diligent study of a few of the best writers, and not the hasty 
 readirg of many, that we derive the greatest benefit from 
 the study of the classics of our own or any other country. 
 The late Mrs. Grant, of Laggan, who had acquired uncom- 
 mon power in the lise of the English language, ascribed heT 
 '.mccess, more than to anything else, to the fact, that for sev- 
 i>ral years in her youth, sh«; was limited in hrr reading tfl 
 the Bible, the Dictionary and Milton's Paradise Lost. 
 
 But. after all, tiie study of the classics is mainly bene- 
 ficial as it enables us to study nature for ourselves, and to 
 discover the fountains from whicii genius in all ages haa 
 been invigoi-ated. When we have learned to associate the 
 seen with the unseen, we have acquired a language which 
 enables us to read with new eyes the inexhaustible volume 
 of the works of God. The world of matter and the Avorld 
 of thought stand up before us in grand parallelism, each 
 re.'lectiiig light upon the other. Thus, in the descriptions 
 of Washington Irving, every flower, every animal, every 
 biid. the hill-side, the waterfall, the field and the forest, all 
 seem endowed with life, and almost with reason; they be- 
 eoiue our companions, and are ever suggesting to us some 
 idea of phiyful humor or of affecting sentnuent. Thus, th« 
 most c<.'mmon occurrences awakened in Burns those analo- 
 
876 
 
 INTELLECTUAL PHILGSOVH' 
 
 gies with human life and mannc'-s^ -vrhica irave cccr.sivt ^ 
 Bomc of his most exquisite odes. 
 
 But; lastly, this habit^ like any other, can only be culti- 
 vated by practice. We must form the combinations 'A the 
 imagination, if we would learn to form them. We muel 
 assiduously cultivate the practice of writing, if we would 
 learn to a\ rite well. If we would write well, we must write 
 earnestly, having an end in view, and being deeply interested 
 in the effort to attain it. In this state of mind analogies 
 the more readily suggest themselves. As they arise (^.imly 
 and flit before us at a distance, we should summon them 
 into our presence, and shape them if possible to our purpose. 
 If they are intractable we must labor the more strenu'.usiy, 
 viewing them from different points, and striving to seize up- 
 on their analogy with the idea which we wish them to illus- 
 trate. We may frequently fail, or at best succeed but im- 
 perfectly. This, however, should not discourage us. 
 Nothing was ever exquisitely finished without unwearied 
 and patient labor, and at the cost of repeated and mortifying 
 failure. By untiring and well-directed effort, great thinga 
 may in the end be accomplished. We must be patien'; Avith 
 ourselves, and not expect to do without labor what other 
 men have done in no other manner. Paradise Lost -,va3 the 
 work of almost a lifetime. Cowper somewhere informs ua 
 that his poetry, which seems to flow without effort, cost him, 
 on an average, half an hour for every line. If incessant 
 toil was necessary to successful effort in minds so highly 
 gifted, ordinary men surely need not to expect to succeed 
 witlout it. 
 
 REFERENCES. 
 
 Imagination in general — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 7. seo i 
 Steps in the process — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 7, sec. 1. 
 
PHILOSOPHICAL IMAGINAliON. 871 
 
 Ptffierence between abstraction in reasoning and imagination — ?tow. 
 frli voL i., chap. 4, sec. 1. 
 
 fielation of imagination to character — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 7, eeca 
 4—6. 
 
 Manner in which imagination pleases us — Stewart, vol. i., chap. 5 
 Part l, sec. 4. 
 
 fidatioc of imagination to fine arts — vol i ch 7, sec. 2 
 
 SECTIOX IV. — PniLOSOPIIICAL IMAGINATION. 
 
 There is another mode m which the imngination acts, of 
 BuiEcient importance to deserve particular attention. It 
 may be denominated Philosophical Imaginntion. AVith some 
 remarks concerning \t we shall conclude the present chapter. 
 
 In this form of imagination, as in the preceding, we com- 
 bine the elements which previously existed in the mind. 
 The elements, however, are in the two cases dissimilar. In 
 poetic imagination, as I have said, we make use of parts 
 of individual wholes, which we combine anew, forming an 
 iraa^e at will. In philosophical imagination our elements 
 are single general truths or separate laws of nature, or the 
 various relations of these laws to each other. These we 
 combine into a conception of a new and more complicated 
 law or general philosophical truth. 
 
 The conceptions when formed by these separate acts of 
 invagination are also exceedingly unlike. By poetical im- 
 agination we form an individual picture, which may be 
 represented to the senses. By philosophical imagination we 
 form not a picture, but an ideal conception of some general 
 truth. By the one we form images, by the otner we frame 
 hypotheses. In the one case, the conception is addressed to 
 the taste, and if the emotion of beauty or sublimity ia 
 a\^akened, our object is accomplished. In the other, the 
 taste is wholly neglected, ai:d our appeal is exclusively to 
 82* 
 
B78 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 the understanding. If the conception is analogous to truth, 
 )r if its truth or falsehood can be definitely determined, 
 nothing more is required. The design of the one is to give 
 us pleasure; of the other, to enlarge our knowledge. 
 
 The nature of the conceptions which we are considering 
 aay be understood by examples. Copernicus, having ob- 
 served tlie various established facts respecting the motions 
 of the heavenly bodies, sought to form a conception of theif 
 various relations which should account for every fact by 
 bringing it under the control of some understood and 
 acknowledged law. Ptolemy and Tycho Brahe had made 
 the same attempt before, but they imagined laws nowhere 
 existing, and left many of the facts wholly unaccounted for. 
 C-^pernicus supposed the sun to be the centre of a single 
 Eystem, the stars being themselves centres of systems at 
 infinite distances from it ; the earth and planets to move 
 around the sun in orbits nearly circular, and the moon to 
 be a satellite of the earth, revolving around it, and thus 
 with it revolving ai'ound the centre of the system. By this 
 conception, all the facts thus far observed were accounted 
 for. Dr. Black, reflecting upon the facts which he had 
 observed respecting the freezing of water, the melting of 
 ice, and the formation and condensation of vapor, sought to 
 form a conception of some general law, which sliould account 
 for all the phenomena. He was thus led to originate the 
 doctrine of latent heat, and immediately saw that this would 
 fulfil every requirement. Each of these is an instance of 
 philosophical imagination. It is an original conception cf 
 Bome general law. or combination of laws, addressing itself 
 to the understanding, and harmonizing facts othevwisa 
 app:irent]y contradictory. 
 
 These illustrations appertain to science. But essentially 
 the same exercise of the imagination must be employed in 
 •very original design. We can never either think or act 
 
PHILCSOPHICAL IMAGIXATION. 379 
 
 efficiently, unless we think or act in conformity with a plan 
 There must always exist some ideal which we propose eitiier 
 to prove or else to realize in action. This iile;il umst be the 
 product of the imagination. The ideal of Paradi.se Lost 
 was thoroughly thought out before a line of it was written. 
 So the plan of every great enterprise u>ust be matured and 
 its detail thoroughly arranged, before it cun be commenced 
 with any hope of success. We see, then, how important an 
 element of individual or social progress is found u^ the exer- 
 cise of this faculty. 
 
 It must be apparent that great diversities of character 
 must necessarily arise from the different degrees in which 
 this endowment is bestowed. Some men have no ideals. 
 They form no plans beyond those demanded in the conduct 
 of the ordinary aifairs of life. In all things else they follow 
 instinctively the beaten track, and yield with unquestioning 
 submission to the opinions of those who have gone before 
 them. They have no other rule of action than implicitly to 
 follow their file-leader, fully convinced that nothing can be 
 better than what has been, and that a course of action must 
 of necessity be wise, provided it has been for a long while 
 pursued. Others, again, are overburdened with imaginings. 
 They do nothing but form plans, and originate projects 
 which have no foundation in general principles, and must 
 inevitably end in ludicrous failure. Such men, however, 
 rarely attempt to realize their own schemes ; they are satis- 
 fied with the attempt to force them upon others. They ars 
 the builders of castles in the air, ever striving after impossi- 
 bilities, spending tbeir lives in the fruitless labor of pursu- 
 ing phantoms and grasping after unsubstantial shadowa 
 That man is rarely endowed who is able to originate Kleala 
 resting on truth, and to work them out witli that bold sagacity 
 which ensures the possibility of realizing thtm in action. 
 When such ]X)wer is united with executive talent, and guideQ 
 
I 
 
 880 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 by enlarged benevolence, it designates a man who was cieated 
 for the benefit of his race. 
 
 It is impoitant to observe the relation which a philosophi- 
 cal imagination sustains to the reasoning power in out 
 investigation of truth. 
 
 I have said that reasoning is the process by which we 
 pass from the known to the unknown, and thus transform 
 the unknown into the known. Suppose the philosopher to 
 stand on the utmost limits of the known. His reason is 
 prepared either to prove or disprove aiiy proposition thai 
 may be jtresented. But there is no propositi n presented. 
 There is nothing within the cognizance of the understand- 
 ing, but on the one side the known, and, on the other, 
 absolute silence and darkness. Reason presents no proposi- 
 tion. Its sole province is either to prove or disprove what is 
 placed before it. None of the other faculties which we 
 have considered can present propositions to the reason, as 
 the matter on which its powers shall be exerted. Hence 
 the necessity of the imagination. Its office is to pass beyond 
 the limits of the known, and form a conception which may 
 be true of something in the unknown. Tliis it presents in 
 the shape of a proposition or a philosophical conception. 
 As soon as this is done, an opportunity is offered for tha 
 exercise of the reasoning faculty. There is something now 
 to be proved, and there may be something by which to prove 
 it. We at once endeavor to discover some media of proof 
 which may show a necessary connection between what ia 
 known, and this proposition which is, as yet, unkiio^>n. 
 Until this connection can be shown, our proposition is a mere 
 suggestion, a theory, an hypothesis. As soon as this con- 
 nection has been established, what was before hypothesis 
 becomes acknowledged truth, and by just so much is the 
 dominion of science extended. 
 
 Or, to express the same idea in another form, experiment 
 
PHILOSOPHICAL IMAGIXATILIT. 38l 
 
 or tlie attempt to discover new truth, is nothing nriorc than 
 putting questions to nature. But a question supiio.-ics soma 
 de^nite object of inquiry. The answer of niUure, if she 
 answer at oH, is always either yes or no. Phik-sophical 
 imagination enables us to put the question in a form capable 
 of a definite answer. It suggests a conception which may 
 be true or false, but which must be either one or the other. 
 By experiment or demonstration we put the question to 
 nature, and receive lier answer either aifirmative or nega- 
 tive. If the answer be negative, Ave surrender our proposi- 
 tion as vrorthless, and the imagination suggests another, and 
 another, until an affirmative answer is received. The work 
 is then accomplished, and a new truth is added to the sum 
 of human knowledge. 
 
 Thus the conceptions of Ptolemy and of Copernicus were 
 both mere hypotheses of equal value, until one was proved 
 to be true. The conception of Newton, that the motions 
 of the bodies which compose the solar system are all sub- 
 jected to the law of gravitation, was a mere hypothesis, a 
 creation of the imagination, until it was scientifically estab- 
 lished. He himself so considered it, and I believe never 
 mentioned it until he had proved it. He considered it merely 
 a question which he had put to nature, unworthy of atten- 
 tion until he had received an affirmative answer. At first, 
 he supposed that the answer which he received was negative. 
 Taking for one element of his calculations the length of a 
 degree of the earth, as it had been measured by the French 
 mathematicians, he found that his hypothesis could not be 
 established, and he laid it aside for several years. A new 
 and more accurate measurement was afterwards obtained, 
 \>'liich brought to his recollection his almost forgotten (im- 
 putations. He commenced them anew, with more accurate 
 data, and soon arrived at the result which added his name 
 to the brief list of those who must always be remembe««d 
 

 882 INTELLE*^} CAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 The saiLt/ process must be performed in every case where a 
 scientific truth is discovered. The proposition of the squared 
 on the sides of a right-angled triangle was a mere hypoth- 
 esis to Pythagoras until he had demonstrated its truth. 
 
 These illustrations have refen-ed to science. The truth 
 here suggested is, however, of wider application. Thus, the 
 ingenious inventor has become acquainted with some natural 
 law which he believes may be rendered available for the 
 service of man. He must form in his own mind a concep 
 tion of the manner in which this result may be accomplished. 
 At first a rough draft is present before him. He per- 
 ceives its, imperfections, and labors to correct them. One 
 and another plan suggests itself, until he has before him a 
 whole system of arrangements by which the result may be 
 attained. Months of anxious thought were consumed by 
 Watt and Fulton before they perfected those conceptions, 
 which, when realized in the form of inventions, have revolu- 
 tionized the manufactures and commerce of the world. The 
 same remark will apply to a military commander, who, 
 before a sword is drawn, must form in his mind the whole 
 plan of a campaign. Thus it is that an act of the imagina- 
 tion jnust precede every otlier, when an important truth m 
 to be discovered, or great enterprise to be achieved. We 
 must, first of all, form a conception of what we would do, or 
 prove, and of the means by which it is to be accomplished. 
 We may, it is true, fall short of our ideal ; but, except by 
 accident, we cannot go beyond it. Hence this creative 
 power lies at the foundation of all great excellence. Other 
 things being equal, he will certainly arrive at the most 
 eminent success, who is able to take the largesi, most com- 
 prehensive, and most truthful views of that wlr oil he lesirea 
 to accomplish. 
 
 I shall close this chapter by a few suggetciojis on tlw 
 mode of improving a philosophical imagination. 
 
PHILOSOPHICAL IMAGINATION S83 
 
 U ia obvious that this power, to be of any practical value 
 a.u8t derive its materials from essential truth. Fancies cac 
 never form the elements of a philosophical imagination. We 
 desire to discover truth ; but truth can only be discovered 
 bj means of truth. The more thoroughly, therefore, we are 
 acquainted with the known, the more easily shall we dis- 
 cover the regions which may be reclaimed from the unknown. 
 Ho will be more likely to extend the limits of human 
 knowledge who has made himself acquainted with already 
 discovered truth. Newton, at an eajly age, was familiar 
 with all that was then known of the science of astronomy ; 
 and this knowledge pointed out to him the line in which dis- 
 covery was to be made. Columbus was profoundly learned 
 in the geography of his age. He was intimately aci^uainted 
 with all that had been discovered of tiie figure of the earth, 
 and the proportions in which its surface was covered with 
 land and water. This knowledge first suggested to him the 
 idea of a new continent. Had he known of nothing beyond 
 the shores of the gulf of Genoa, his mind could never have 
 formed this magnificent conception, and after-ages would 
 never have heard of the " world-seeking Genoese." 
 
 2. I have before remarked the power of general izci'u'.oa to 
 aid in the discovery of truth. We may here obscv^-e the 
 mode in which it tends to this result. Every object in 
 nature, every change, every law, is the type of a class more 
 numerous than we are able to conceive. These types are 
 repeated and diversified in infinite variety, but they are all 
 characteiized by the same essential elements, unseen, it may 
 be, by the casual observer, but understood by the far-sigiited 
 m .crpreter of nature. He who is able to distinguish the 
 Ci.^ontial elements of a type from its accidental cir-^um- 
 etances. trace them out through their various mnnifestations, 
 and expand them to their widest generalizations, will find \l^i 
 mind replete with conceptions of all possible truth. Gen- 
 
384 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPnY. 
 
 eralization pointed out to Newton those conceptions which 
 led to most of his discoveries, and also gave rise to manj; 
 suggestions which were not proved to be discoveries until 
 more than a century after his death. In his experiments 
 on light, lie observed that the refracting power of different 
 belies was in proportion to their combustibility., and that tho 
 diamond possessed the former power in an unusual degree, 
 Applying this law to this particular case, he was led to con 
 ceive that the diamond itself mio;ht be combustible. Though 
 a minwal. and tlie hardest of known substances, he disie- 
 garded these accidents, and, boldly generalizing his idea, 
 predictcid a discovery which only a few years since has been 
 established. 
 
 3 In the works of a great artist, there is always to be 
 observed a manner peculiar to himself, which a true connois- 
 seur will readily detect. We call this peculiarity the style 
 of an author or an artist. It is derived from the intellec- 
 tual and moral character of the individual, and is that which 
 renders his outward works the index of his inward and spir- 
 itual mind. It is natural to suppose that this peculiarity 
 cbould be apparent in the woiks of the Creator. There is 
 a speciality in his mode of treating subjects, a style which 
 desi j;nates all the works of his hand. He who, by deep and 
 prolbund reflection on the works of God, has become most 
 familiar with the laws of that which we call nature, and 
 with the relations Avhich these laws sustain to each other 
 will be the most likely to penetrate into the unknown, and 
 originate those conceptions which lead to the discovery of 
 trufn. The further he advances in his investigations, the 
 richer will be the field of discovery that opens before him. 
 
 If I may be allowed, I will use an illustration wh>h J 
 once employed when treating on this subject. " Suppse I 
 should present before you one of the paintings of Rapnae! 
 audj covering a part of it with a screen, ask you to pr'jceed 
 
PHILOSOPHICAL I.MACINATIOX. 385 
 
 With the work, and designate where the next lines shouUl be 
 drawn. It is evident that none but a painter ever need 
 make the attempt, and that, of painters, he would be the 
 most likely to succeed who was best acquainted with the 
 genius of Raphael, and had most thoroughly meditated on 
 the manner in which that genius manifested itself in the 
 work before him. So, of the system of the universe. We 
 see but in part; all the rest is hidden from our view. 
 Ho will, however, most readily discover where the next 
 lines are drawn who is most thoroughly acquainted with 
 the character of the author, and has observed with the 
 greatest accuracy tiie manner in which that character is dis- 
 played in that portion of the system which he has revealed 
 to us. It is evident, also, that just in proportion as the 
 work advanced, and portion after portion of tiie screen wa3 
 removed, just in that proportion would the difficulty of com- 
 pleting the whole be diminished.'* — Discourse on the Phi- 
 losophy of Analogy. 
 
 If these reinarks be true, they throw some light upon 
 the subject of education. The power of forming conceptiona 
 which shall lead to discovery in science, or to the practica- 
 ble in action, is clearly of vast importance. Can this power 
 oe cultivated ? On this question there can be no doubt. It 
 steadily increases with the progress of the human mind. 
 AVe naturally inquire whether the cultivation of this ele- 
 ment of intellectual character has been regarded with suffi- 
 cient attention by those who form our courses of higher 
 education. A large part of the studies which we pursue 
 add very little to our power of forming conceptions of any 
 character A\hatever. A larger infusion of the study of 
 pliysical science, not merely as a collection of facts, but aa 
 a system of laws, with their relations and dependencies, 
 would be of great value in this respect. We thus study 
 the ideas and conceptions of the Creator. We become ac- 
 33 
 
6SQ INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 quainted "with his manner of accomplishing his purposes 
 and learn, in seme measure, the style of the Author of all 
 things. Surely, this habit of mind must be of unspeakable 
 value to a philosopher in the discovery of truth, or to a man 
 of affairs in devising his plans, since these can only succeed 
 as they are in harmony with the designs of infinite wisdoip 
 and benevolence. 
 
 •• There 's a Divinity that shapes our ends, 
 Bough-hew them as we will." 
 
 RE FEREN CES. 
 
 Nature of hypothesis — Reid, Jlssay 1, chap. 3, 
 Importance of ideals — Stewart, vol i., chap. 7, wc 6 
 Garfaua style in nature's works — voL ii., chap. 4, tcu 
 
CHAPTER Vlll 
 
 TASTE. 
 
 SECTION I. — THE NATUtE 01 TA.'/A 
 
 We have now considered the most important ( f thoee 
 p'.wers of the human mind which may be strictly termed 
 intellectual; that is, which are employed in the acquisition 
 and increase of knowledge. By the use of these wt mi^L'ht 
 prosecute our inquiries in every direction, and extend the 
 limits of science, as far as it has been permitted by our Crea- 
 tor. But were this all, we should be deprived of much of 
 the innocent pleasure which accompanies the employment 
 of our faculties, and thus lose an important inducement to 
 mental cultivation. We find that many of the phenomena 
 which we observe, are to us a source of happiness, frequently 
 of an exquisite character. This happiness is bestowed upon 
 us through means of another endowment, which we denomi- 
 nate taste. It is so intimately associated with the faculties 
 purely intellectual, that our view of them would be imperfect 
 dii we not bestow upon it at least a brief examination. 
 
 T»6te is that mental sensibility by which we cognize the 
 beauties and deformities of nature and art, — enjoying 
 pleasure from the one, and suffering pain from the other. 
 
 in this definition we speak cf taste as a sensibility, ratbei 
 
SS8 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHIC. 
 
 than a faculty. A faculty is the power of doing something 
 of putting forth some act, or accomplishing some change. 
 Such is not the nature of taste. It creates no change. It 
 merely recognizes its appropriate object, and is the seat of the 
 subjective emotion to Avhich the object gives exercise. When 
 an object is presented, taste recognizes its aesthetic quality ; 
 it is sensible of pleasure or pain, and here its office terminatng. 
 Of the univei-saliiy of this endowment there cannot be a 
 question. The consciousness of every man bears testimony 
 to its existence. When we look upon a rainbow, we are 
 sensible of an emotion wholly different from that with which 
 we look upon the dark cloud which it overspreads. The 
 cause of the emotion we call the beauty of the rainbow, and 
 the emotion itself we recognize as one of a peculiar charac- 
 ter, unlike any other of which we are conscious. We ob- 
 serve that all men are affected by a multitude of objects in 
 the same manner as ourselves. Young and old, cultivated 
 and uncultivated, observe this quality in many of the same 
 objects, and are affected by them in the same manner. It 
 is not asserted, however, that all men recognize the quality 
 of beauty in the same things, or that all men are conscious 
 of the same intensity of aesthetic emotion. These may xary 
 by association and culture. What is here affirmed, is, that 
 all men, in various degrees, are conscious of the pleasure 
 lerived from the observation of objects which they term 
 beautiful, and that there are objects, which all men of the 
 eame or a similar degree of culture, designate by this epi- 
 thet. Hence, particular scenes have been, by all observers, 
 denominated beautiful or sublime. Hence, descriptions of 
 localities or events have been transmitted from age to age, 
 from nation to nation, and from language to language, ever 
 awakening the emotions to which they at first owed their 
 celebrity. Anacreon's ode to Spring. Homer's description 
 of a storm in the .S^gean, Horace's Fountain of Erundit 
 
NATURE OF TASTE. 888 
 
 Binin and the plcasui-es of a country life, Milton's Gardec 
 of Eden, seem beautiful to all men ; and every man. when 
 be applies to them this designation, is certain that he uses 
 language which is perfectly well understood by the men 
 whom he addresses. 
 
 It may serve to render our notion of taste more definite 
 if we distinguish it from some of the faculties with which 
 it is liable to be confounded. 
 
 Taste is sometimes confounded with imagination. Thua 
 fiofurative language and works of art in general are some- 
 times said to be addressed to the imagination. This is not 
 strictly true. The conceptions of the fine arts are created 
 by the imagination of one, and reproduced by the imagina- 
 tion of another. This is, however, only the means to an 
 end. Our ultimate object is to present them to taste, for, 
 unless the taste be gratified, no matter how strongly they 
 may be imagined, the whole object for which they are 
 created, fails. 
 
 Imagination is the faculty by which we combine ; taste 
 is the sensibility by which we feel. Imagination forms pic- 
 tures ; taste determines whether or not a certain quality 
 exists in them after they are formed. By my imagination, 
 I form a conception of a landscape ; by my taste, I decide 
 upon the beauty of the conception which I have created. 
 Imagination creates ; taste judges of the creation. Imagina- 
 tion itself is the seat neither of pleasure nor pain ; all the 
 pleasure which we enjoy, or the pain which we suffer, from 
 the works of the imagination, is derived from taste. 
 
 These endowments may be conferred in very different degree 
 ui)on th3 same person. A fertile imagination, as I liave 
 before remarked, is sometimes c.->mbined with a very imper- 
 fect taste. In such cases, an artist will form images in 
 great profusion, but they fail to please, and sometimes dis- 
 gust us. Such seems to have been the case with Fuseli, a 
 33* 
 
89G 
 
 llSrrELLECTUAL PHILOSOIHT. 
 
 painter of boundless imagination, but frequentlj tjmbinin^ 
 in his conceptions the sublime and the ridiculous- Thia 
 peculiar type of cluuacter is not uncommonly found in pf^r. 
 sons passiUjf into insanity, or in that condition of the intel- 
 lect, sometimes existing tlirough life, in which the individual 
 dwells habitually upcn the narrow confine which separates 
 sanity from madness. The late Edward Irving, a man of 
 powerful imagination and withal of commanding eloquence, 
 seems for many of the later years of his life to have exem- 
 plified this remark. 
 
 It is, however, more common to find men endowed with a 
 correct taste, but deficient in imagination. Such persons, 
 have no power of original creation, while they will decide 
 correctly conceining the creations of others. They are 
 good critics, but bad artists. For a man of so eminent en- 
 dowments, I think that Addison may be considered much 
 more remarkable for taste than iniagination. I think it was 
 the great Lord Chatham who remarked, that few men were 
 endowed with the " prophet ic eye of taste," that is, who 
 could create for themselves a conception, and judge correctly 
 concerning its beauty, before it had assumed a visible reality. 
 His remai k was made with reference to landscape gardening, 
 but it is of general application. We know that almost every 
 man can determine whether grounds are laid out beautifully, 
 while very few men have the talent for so laying them out 
 as to confer permanent pleasure on the beholder. Distin- 
 guished success in the fine arts can only be attained by 
 tliose, in whom both of these endowments are in an eminent 
 degree united. Homer, Milton, Shakspeare, M. Angelo, 
 ({apbael, were all thus preeminently gifted. 
 
 Taste and •conscience have many points both of similarity 
 and difference. Both of them belong to the class of original 
 Buggestions. Both take cognizance of a peculiar quality in 
 in external object, and both derire either pleasure or pai* 
 
NATURE OF TASTE. &9\ 
 
 from the cognizance of this quality. When I see an act 
 done, I recognize in it the quality of right or wrong, anJ I 
 am conscious also of a subjective emotion. So I perceive 
 an external object. I observe in it the quality of beauty or 
 deformity, and it awakens its corresponding aesthetic emo- 
 tion, which is either the pleasure or pain of taste. In these 
 respects they singularly coincide. 
 
 In many important particulars, however, they are widel? 
 dissimilar. 
 
 Conscience observes the peculiar quality which it detects, 
 in nothing but the voluntary actions of responsible beings 
 Taste discovei-s the quality which it cognizes, in all objects 
 material and spiritual, in all actions, and in all relations. 
 The one is called into action by the quality of right or 
 wrong ; the other by beauty or deformity. The difference 
 between these two qualities is manifest at once to our con- 
 Rciousness. Every one knows that the quality which he 
 recognizes ia a rose, and that which he recognizes in an act 
 of noble self-sacrifice, are as different as any two objects 
 within the i-ange of his knoAvledge. The subjective emotion 
 awakened hj conscience is wholly unlike that awakened by 
 taste. The emotion of conscience is complicated with a 
 variety of other emotions, as. for instance, of moral appro- 
 bation or disapprobation, the conviction of good or ill desert, 
 the assurance of consequences which must result from 
 moral action. The pleasure of taste is simple, terminating 
 in itself, and wholly destitute of any moral emotion. No 
 man can pay even a casual attention to the deliverances of 
 consciousness, without being convinced of the wide differ- 
 tncc both objective and subjective, of these two eolowmenta. 
 
 The character of taste varies greatly with age. In youth, 
 bright colors and strong contrasts please us. We are inca- 
 pable of being affected by an^'thing which does not impress 
 OS strongly. As we gr>w older, we derive more pleasura 
 
S92 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 from form, proportion, symmetry and expression. Lesj 
 iazzling colors, and more subdued contrasts become agree- 
 able, and we behold with indifference what we once admired 
 as beautiful. In this respect, savages resemble children 
 No color pleases them so much as scarlet, no matter in what 
 form it may become a part of the dress. Their ornaments 
 are such as force themselves upon the notice, without any 
 regard to the relation which they sustain to the character 
 of the wearer, or their harmony with the general impression 
 which he supposes himself to produce. Ornaments, in a 
 more advanced state of society, worn merely to attract 
 attention, or for the display of wealth, manifest the same im- 
 perfection of taste which we observe in savages. 
 
 gPGTION II. — TASTE CONSIDERED OBJECTIVELY. — MATE- 
 RIAL QUALITIES AS OBJECTS OF TASTE. 
 
 Tb e objects adapted to awaken the emotion of taste arc 
 innunerable. The Creator, having bestowed upon us this 
 sensi'jility, has made the universe around us to minister tc 
 its (gratification. The heavens above, the earth beneath, 
 all »he changes of the seasons, all the products of animal 
 and vegetable life, the gems of the mine and the pearls of 
 the ocean, the ripple of the brook and the thunder of the 
 cataract, the prancing of the war-horse and the bounding 
 of the fawn, the wing of the butterfly and the plumage cf 
 the bird of Paradise, the carol of the lark and the wild 
 screim of the eagle, with the ten thousand objects which 
 moot us v/herever we look abroad upon the works of God. 
 are intended to awaken the emotions of beauty and sublim- 
 ity, and fill us with humble adoration of Him who is thfl 
 Give: of every g'lod and perfect gift. 
 
OBJECTS OF TASTE. 398 
 
 To attempt an enumeration of all the objects in A\hich we 
 discover beauty or sublimity would be useless. We shall 
 merely indicate some of the classes of objects by which we 
 are thus affected, principally for the sake of directing atten- 
 tion to the aesthetic elements existing in the w jrld around ua 
 The qualities of external objects which address them- 
 Belves to the taste are those which arc perceived by the eja 
 end the ear. 
 
 By the eye we perceive color ^ Jottji^ and motion. 
 Color as an object of beauty. 
 Colors may be divided into prismatic and plain. 
 The prismatic colors are violet, indigo, blue, green, yel- 
 low, orange and red. These all are beautiful separately, 
 and, in an eminent degree, when combined. What can be 
 more exquisitively beautiful in color, than the summer rain- 
 bow or the solar spectrum ] No human being probably ever 
 looked upon them without intense delight. 
 
 A distinction may, however, be discovered between the 
 prismatic colors. The first three of the series, in the order 
 in whieh I have mentioned them, may be denominated grave, 
 the last three gay, while the remaining one, green, possesses 
 a character intermediate between them. Hence, gay colors 
 are most appropriate to festive occasions, while graver are 
 adapted to occasions of solemnity. The dresses of men are 
 geneially either black or blue ; those of women, of every 
 variety of color, but more commonly gay. How strangely 
 inappropriate would it seem if the dresses of a wedding 
 party or a ball-room, and those of a court of justice were ex 
 changed for each other ! The colors of the garden and the 
 f.eld are commonly eithei white or some modification of red, 
 orange, or yellow. The grave colors are here observed but 
 rarely, and then in their lighter shades ; or, by being mingled 
 with the others, they increase their effect by contrast. 
 The color, however, wh'ch is most abundantly spread 
 
J94 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY- 
 
 over nature is green. It is universally agreeable; it admits 
 of an infinite variotj' of shade, and, without producing any 
 vivid emotion, harmonizes most happily with all. A grove 
 is an appropriate place for a festive entertainment, and treea 
 are the indispensable ornament of a cemetery, where every- 
 thing reminds us of the sorrows of separation and the so- 
 lemnities of eternity. 
 
 Color sometimes becomes an element of sublimity as well 
 as of beauty. The sublimity of a thunder cloud is increased 
 by its intense blackness. Tiie deep blue of the heavens, in 
 a clear night, adds greatly to the grandeur of the spectacle 
 which they exhibit. 
 
 Many of the objects which we perceive are clothed with 
 plain colors, as gray, brown, dusky, or wood color. These 
 produce in us no emotion, either of pleasure or pain, but 
 they relieve the eye when fatigued by the brilliancy of the 
 prismatic colors. Thus, the earth when not covered with 
 vegetation, the trunks and branches of trees, and most of 
 our domestic animals, are clothed in plain colors. 
 
 Form. — We detect the quality of beauty in the simplest 
 varieties of form. Thus, a straight is more beautiful than 
 an irregular line. A curved, irrespective of utility, is more 
 beautiful than a straight line. A spiral line, as of a vine 
 entwined around a column, is more beautiful than either. 
 The stems of flowen that bend gently downward, like the 
 lily of the valley, a,ro more beautiful than those which. stand 
 straight and inflexible, hke the hollyhock. Every one hag 
 remarked the difference between the serpentine bending of 
 a river, seeming to turn at will in any direction which it 
 prefers, and the stiff rectilinearity of a canal, carried through 
 bill and over valley, without a single graceful flexure to 
 vary its monotony 
 
 Angles seem capal le of greater beauty than could ha pa 
 been anticipated. The obtuse angle of the roof of a GreciJMj 
 
OBJECTS 01 TASTE. 395 
 
 lemple is remnrkaMj agreeaMe. The whole effect of the 
 ed:Sce would be destroyed by raising the roof to an acute 
 angle. On the contrary, a pyramid standing on the ground^ 
 if its apex were obtuse, would appear squat and disgu.«tiug. 
 Yet, an acute-angled roof is not always displeasing. To a 
 Gothic cdificfc it is indispensable, and here an obtuse angle 
 vould be intolerable. That this difference exists must, I 
 think, be admitted by all. The reason of it I am unable 
 to discover. 
 
 Figure. — Irrespective of utility, figures bounded by 
 carves are more beautiful than those bounded by straight 
 lines. A sphere is more beautiful than a cube, a circle 
 than a sfj[uare, an ellipse than a parallelogram, a cylindri- 
 cal than a rectangular column. The lines of beauty in tlie 
 human countenance are all curves. What could be more 
 shocking than a human face, formed by right lines? The 
 petals of flowers, the outline of fruits, are almost univer- 
 sally bounded by curves. 
 
 Eegular figures are ahvays more beautiful than irregular. 
 A square is more beautiful than a trapezoid. A room of 
 which the opposite sides are not equal, or a window or door 
 not exact parallelograms, affect us painfully. The roof of a 
 house of which the sides slant unequally is everywhere dis- 
 agreeable. 
 
 Simple forms are generally more beautiful than complex. 
 Every one admires the simple majesty of a Grecian temple, 
 the mere combination of a few right lines and circles. Yet 
 this rule is. by no means, exclusive. The Gothic cathedral 
 is remarkable for its extreme complexity, both of design 
 and ornament, and yet it is preeminently beautiful. 
 
 Vioftort'ioii. — Proportion is a relation existing betTeea 
 the parts of the same figure, as between the length acd 
 breadth of a parallelogram, the two diameters of an ellipse, 
 tho rliametcr and height of a column, or the base and elev*. 
 
596 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 tion of a building. In some of these we discover beauty , 
 in others deformity. A building with no other beautj 
 than that of proportion is frequently decidedly agrceahle. 
 It requires the highest skill in an artist to determine before- 
 hand the proportions that shall please all men in all ages.. 
 In this respect the taste of the Greeks was preeminent 
 The canons which they established f&r the proportions of 
 the several parts of a temple have never been improved. 
 It has been found that no material departure can be made 
 from them without producing deformity. 
 
 Uniformity, or perfect similarity of corresponding parts, 
 is another source of beauty. We admire a tree, of which 
 the opposite branches are equal, and project at the samo 
 angle from the trunk. A building with equal wings on 
 the opposite sides is frequently beautiful; but if the wings 
 be of different magnitudes, or dissimilar construction, it is 
 considered a deformity. The limbs on the opposite sides of 
 the body, the features on the opposite sides of the face, are 
 uniform ; when it is otherwise, we are pained by what seems 
 a monstrosity. 
 
 But, while uniformity is pleasing, it is necessary to observe 
 that its opposite, variety, is equally pleasing. In objects 
 designed to accomplish the same purpose we expect uni- 
 formity ; but Avhen the design is different, or even suscep- 
 tible of modification, we are delighted with variety. We 
 love to see the opposite branches of the same tree uniform ; 
 but we also love to see the different trees of a forest or a 
 park marked by every possible variety. We are pleased 
 when the windows of a house, in the same story and in the 
 same line, are uniform; but we are also pleased to see the 
 windows of diffeient stories dissimilar. If two rows of 
 co'-umns are placed one above the other, in the front cf a 
 buildinii, it would be monstrous to see different orders of 
 
OBJECTS OF TASTB. 8J1 
 
 iTchitecture occupying the same line ; but \\e are pleased 
 when the upper row is of a different order from the lower. 
 
 M.iguitiidc has an important influence on all our aesthetic 
 ideas. Vastness is a quality which addresses strongly the 
 sensibility of taste. Every one has felt the emotion of sub- 
 lini.ty when travelling through a mountainous country 
 Ile-ce a region hke Switzerland becomes a favorite resort 
 for the lovers of nature from every part of the civilized 
 vroild. The ocean is at all times a most impressive object, 
 especially when lashed into tempest. Here vastness in 
 magnitude combines with resistless force to create the 
 strongest emotion of sublimity. On the other hand, small- 
 ness, if combined with regularity, may be eminently beau- 
 tiful ; but, without regularity, littleness awakens no emotion. 
 iVn overhanging cliff is sublime ; a fragment broken off 
 from it is indifferent ; but a delicately-formed crystal found 
 in that fragment may be remarkably beautiful. The temple 
 of Minerva, or Lincoln cathedral, impresses us with awe, 
 and awakens the emotion of sublimity ; but an accurate 
 model of either, of a few inches in magnitude, would be 
 exceedingly beautiful. A cascade in a brook is beautiful ; 
 but the cataract of Niagara is inexpressibly sublime. 
 
 Such are some of the facts relating to beauty of form 
 It is proper, however, to remark that they are cnly general, 
 not universal ; that is, we frequently observe beauty which 
 seems at variance with the most commonly observed laws. 
 "We can never say that, because a particular form or pr> 
 portion is beautiful, therefore, in different circumstances, a 
 form directly the reverse must be disagreeable. Our notiona 
 en these subjects are frequently modified by association. 
 But where no association exists, we observe contradictiona 
 which can be harmonized by no laws with which I am ac- 
 quainted. A remarkable instance of this occurs in ths 
 c&flderful beauty of the Grecian temple and the Gotbio 
 34 
 
8^8 liJTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 cathedral, of which the canons are precisely the reverse of 
 each other. In deciding upon any form of bc'iutj, oui 
 appeal must, therefore, be to the sensitiveness of our com- 
 mon nature. The taste of mankind is here vPimate, ami 
 soems frequently to set all our laws at defiance. 
 
 Motion as a source of beauty. 
 
 Motion is in itself pleasing. A ship under aiil is vastly 
 SD)re beautiful than a ship lying at anchor or fit the wharf. 
 
 But motion is of various kinds, each exhibiting some 
 peculiar form of beauty. 
 
 Motion may be either quick or slow. Tho'xgh both au 
 agreeable objects to the taste, slow motion tend 5 more to the 
 beautiful, and swift to the sublime. The &\ov sailing of a 
 hawk is beautiful ; when pouncing upon his prey, the motion 
 tends to the sublime. The gentle flow of a river is beau 
 tiful ; when it falls over a precipice it is sublime. 
 
 In general, it may be remarked, that no motion is beau- 
 tiful which betokens toil or violent effort. The nearer it 
 approaches to utter unconsciousness of exertion, other things 
 being equal, the more beautiful it becomes. Every one 
 must have observed the aesthetic diiference between the toil- 
 8ome gait of a rhinoceros, or an elephant, and the elastic 
 bounding of a deer. The motion of a vessel under sail, 
 for this reason, is, I think, more beautiful than of one pro- 
 pelled by steam. 
 
 Motion in curves is more beautiful than that in straight 
 lines, both because of the greater beauty of the curved lino, 
 and because curvilinear motion in licates less effort. For 
 thc3C reasons, the motion of a fish in tlie water has always 
 feecmed to me remarkably beautiful. The waving of a field 
 of s;rain, presenting an endless succession of curved line3, 
 ad ancing and receding with gentle motion, uniform in thi 
 midst of endless variety, has always seemed to me one o\ 
 the most beautiful objects in nature. On the contrary 
 
OBJECTS OF TArfTE. 899 
 
 lolting and angular motion always displeases us. How dif- 
 ferent is the effect produced by the motion of one man on 
 crutches, ai d of another on skates ! 
 
 Ascending motion is more graceful than descending, if it 
 do not betoken effort. The ascent of a rocket is more beau- 
 tiful than its descent, especially if it ascend in a curved lino. 
 Fur this reason a jet d'eau is vastly more beautiful than a 
 waterfill of the same volume. Ascending motion in spiral 
 lines is exceedingly beautiful, as for instance, the ascent of 
 a hawk, as it moves slowly upward, in oft-repeated circles. 
 It is manifest that many objects derive their power to 
 please us from a single one of these qualities. Thus, the 
 evening cloud displays rarely any other beauty than that of 
 color. Others combine several of them, conducing to the 
 Mime result. Thus the rainbow unites beauty of color with 
 beauty of form. The greater the number and the more intense 
 the dtgree in which any object unites these several qualities, 
 the more impressive does it become, and the more univer- 
 sally is it selected by poets and artists for esthetic effect 
 Thus the human foi m. especially the countenance, combin- 
 ing beauty of color, form, motion, and expression, is always 
 considered the most remarkable object in nature, and is 
 seleoted by painters and sculptors, as the finest subject on 
 which their art can be employed. 
 
 Objects of taste addressed to the ear^ 01 beauty of 
 sozmd. 
 
 That sound is a source of beauty, independently, and 
 eipeci:illy in combination with other objects, will be readily 
 granted by every lover of nature. How greatly is the effL-ct 
 of a summer's landscape increased by the singing of birds ' 
 Sounds differ in their degree of loudness. 
 Loudness awakens the emotion of sublimity, as in Cic 
 instance of a peal of thunder or the roar of a cacaract. 
 Soothing sounds as the singing of birds, the hum of beea 
 
4v0 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 ihe r.w^-»tliiig of the trees of a forest, add greatly to ihs 
 effect of a summer's landscape. Low, continuous sound 
 tends to repose, and harmonizes with all our ideas of tho 
 peace and quietness of a country life. These circumstat.cea 
 are beautifally combined by Virgil, in describing ihe f race 
 of Italy, in contrast with the civil wars by which ii hsui 
 been 80 lately devastated : 
 
 •' Sepes 
 ITybljeis apibus florem depasta salicti, 
 Saepe levi somnum suadebit inire susurro 
 Hinc, alta sub rupe, canit frondator ad auras. 
 Nee tamen interea, raucae, tua cura, palumbes. 
 Nee gemere a«ria cessabit turtur ab ulmo." 
 
 1 Buco^\0. 
 
 So Shakspeare, alluding to the power of gentle rounds 
 
 " That strain again ; it had a dying fill. 
 0, it came o 'er my ear like the sweet south 
 That breathes upon a bank of violets, 
 Stealing and giving odor," 
 
 Twelfth Night, Act 1, Scene \. 
 
 But, while loudness of sound awakens the emotion of sub- 
 limity, it must not be supposed that its opposite, absolute 
 silence, is unimpressive. Deep silence is frequently emi- 
 nently sublime, especially when it occurs in the interHssion 
 of the roar of the tempest, or in preparation for the awful 
 catastrophe of a battle. Campbell, in his "Battle •"' the 
 
 As tfiey drifted on their path, 
 There was silence deep as death, 
 And the boldest held his breath 
 
 For a time. 
 « Hearts of oak ! ' our captain cried, and .v»ch {ob. 
 From its adamantine lips. 
 
OBJECTS OF TASTE. 401 
 
 Spkead a death-shade roand tha ships, 
 LIk<: the hurricane eclipse 
 Of the sun.* 
 
 The late Dr. Jeffries, of Boston, in the narrati'.e of \ii8 
 |>ag}age across the English Channel with Montgolficr, ia a 
 balioon, has the following striking remark : 
 
 ''Amidst all the magnificent scenes around me and under 
 me, nothing at the time more impressed me with its novelty 
 than (if I may be allowed to use the expression) the aw- 
 ful stillness or silence in which we seemed to be enveloped, 
 ■which produced a sensation that I am unable to describe, 
 but which seemed at the time to be a certain kind of stillnesa 
 (if I may so e.xpress it) that could be felt."-- Narrative 
 of Two Aerial Voyages, page 52. 
 
 Sound may be either lengthened or abrupt. Continuous 
 Bound is grave ; abrupt sound is exciting. We all have ob- 
 served the difference between the long, reechoed bellowings 
 of distant thunder, and the sudden rattling reverberation 
 of thunder near at hand. Music with few or distant inter- 
 vals harmonizes with a melancholy train of thought. Mu- 
 sic with rapid and frequent intervals is cheering and ani- 
 mating. Every one knows the different effects of a dirge 
 and a quick-step, or of the same air played in q tick and in 
 slow time. 
 
 The effect of music on our emotions is thus admirably 
 iesci ibcd by Cowper : 
 
 •* There is in souls a sympathy with sounds, 
 And ns the mind is pitched, the eixr is ple;i8ed 
 With melting aii-s or martial, brisk or grave. 
 Some ciiord in unison with what we hear 
 Is touched witliin us, and the heart repliea. 
 How soft the music of yon village bells. 
 Boiling at intervals upon the ear 
 In cadence sweet ! now dying all away. 
 Now pealing loud again, and louder rtill, 
 
 34* 
 
i02 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Clear and sonorous as the gale comes on 
 With easy P. TCP it opens all the cells 
 Where memory slept." 
 
 Task, Book 6. 
 
 I have thus far spoien of sounds \>hich produce at 
 aesthetic effect upon us by themselves. It is, however, 
 yrobable that sounds depend more upon association for their 
 eflfect, than either color or form. The effect of music ia 
 greatly increased by uniting it with appropriate words. The 
 most common air, if associated with the remembrance of 
 home and country and friends, becomes deeply affectincr. I 
 have heard the Swiss herdsman's song, and it seemed to me 
 dull and monotonous, without any power of appeal to the 
 heart. Yet it is said to effect these mountaineers, when in 
 a foreign land, even to weeping : so that the playing of it ia 
 forbidden in the armies with Avhich they are in service. 
 
 It is on this account that common sounds, nay. sounds in 
 themselves displeasing, become, under peculiar circum- 
 stances, delightful. There is nothing intrinsically pleasing 
 in the lowing of cattle ; when heard close at hand, it is dis- 
 agreeable. Yet I have heard seamen speak with deep feel- 
 ing of the delight with which they listened to these sounds^ 
 when, after a long voyage, they first heard them from their 
 Lative shore. In a word, anything pleases us which recalls 
 deeply-affecting reminiscences ; and music possesses thig 
 power in a remarkable degree. Cowper expresses this truth 
 with exquisite taste in the following passage : 
 
 " Nor rural sights alone, but rural sounds 
 Exhilarate the spirit, and restore 
 The tone of languid nature. Mighty winds. 
 That sweep the skirt of some far-spreading wood 
 Of ancient growth, make music not unlike 
 The dash of ocean on his winding shore. 
 Ten tht'isand warblers cheer the iay, and one 
 
OBJKCTS OF TASTE. 
 
 40SI 
 
 TJie livelong night. Nor the«e aione, whose D't^t 
 Nice-fingered art must emiilite in v.iiu. 
 But cawing rooks, and kites, that soar ^uMiuie 
 In still repeated circles, sci-eaniing loud. 
 The jay, the pie, and e'en the boding owl. 
 That hails the rising morn, have ciiirni« fiir me. 
 Sounds i/itiurmonious in Ihemsclccx, and A^rsrt, 
 Yet heard in scenes where peace forever reigns. 
 And only there, please highly, for her sake." 
 
 T^x, Book !. 
 
 BXCnON III — OBJECTS OF T.A.STE. 
 
 ITIES. 
 
 IMMATERIAL QUAV 
 
 There can be no doubt that we discover in tlie creation 
 (tfound us much that is beautiful which cannot be referred 
 to any material quality. There are various attributes of 
 human beings Avhich do not discover themselves to the 
 senses. There are various affections of our sjjiritual nature 
 which we are able to contemplate distinctly by themselves. 
 These affections are capable of producing in us the emotion 
 of beauty and sublimity, or of deformity and meanness. A 
 brief consideration of some of these is necessary to the 
 completion of the plan which we have proposed. 
 
 The order in which these emotions arise is probably tho 
 following. We first become conscious of the emotion of 
 bjauty from the contemplation of material objects. Colors 
 and sounds first delight us ; then form and motion. But, 
 as our minds assume a subjective tendency, we think of 
 the a;tions, the motives, the governing principles, and char- 
 acters of men. We find that some of these awaken in U3 
 an emotion exceedingly analogous to that of which we were 
 conscious when we observed the beautiful and sublime in 
 external nature. We give to both classes of emotion ihe 
 iume name, and designate the objects which awaken them 
 
404 INTELLECTVIAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 by the same epithet. Thus, we speak of a beautiful flower, 
 and of a beautiful sentiment, of a sublime scene and a sub- 
 lime action, employing the same term to designate the aes- 
 thetic quality in the object, whether it be material or imma- 
 terial. 
 
 It may, however, be well to observe, in passing, that the 
 emotion of taste, when we contemplate a moral action, ia 
 different from the moral emotion. In the latter case, we 
 look upon it as right or wrong ; as fulfilling or violating 
 obligation ; as a matter for moral approbation or disappro- 
 bation, and as involving consequences greater than we can 
 adequately conceive. In this case, we merely contemplate 
 its aesthetic quality, as something which excites within us 
 the emotion of the beautiful or sublime, without any consid- 
 eration of its merit or demerit, or any view of its conse- 
 quences either here or hereafter. Hence it is that there are 
 many more admirers of goodness tban good men. A pro- 
 fane and impious poet may discourse eloquently on the 
 character of a lioly God, as Rousseau paid a striking tribute 
 to the moral sublimity of the death of the Redeemer. 
 
 I proceed to mention a few examples of immaterial qual- 
 ities which seem to possess remarkable aesthetic power. 
 
 Unusual power of intellect, successfully displayed, pre- 
 Bents an object singularly pleasing to the taste. Newton, in 
 his study, arriving at the result of his labors, and over- 
 whelmed with the consciousness that he had revealed to 
 mankind the mechanism of the universe ; Milton, in pov- 
 erty and blindness, working out his immortal epic ; Gitbon, 
 §eated on the ruins of the Coliseum, resolving to develop 
 the cause of the decline and fall of the Roman empire, — 
 are illustrations of this form of sublimity. 
 
 High intelligence, leading to important and self-reliant 
 action, presents a still more impressive object of the spirit- 
 ually sublime. A general, on the eve of a great battla 
 
IMMATEBIAL OBJECTS 0. TASTE. 405 
 
 prepared for a contest on which vast Issues depend, as Na- 
 poleon at the battle of the Pyramids ; Columbus meditating 
 the discovtry of America, and fully resolved to Uivor^ hia 
 life to the search for an unknown world; Clarkson r'^silv- 
 ing to lay aside every other object, and live thereafttr oi\ly 
 for the abolition of the African slave-trade, — may all l< 
 cited as instances of this kind. 
 
 The social and domestic affections, when conspicuously 
 displayed, furnish many illustrations of beauty and sublim- 
 ity. The affection of the parent for his prodigal son, in 
 the inimitable parable of our Lord ; the Roman daughter 
 nourishing from her own breast her father who waa 
 condemned to die by starvation ; the lament of David over 
 Saul and Jonathan, and his bitter wailing over his son Ab- 
 salom ; the parting of Paul from the elders at Miletus, — 
 are all illustrations of the power of affection to create the 
 emotion of the beautiful, and they have been frequently 
 used for this purpose by poets and artists. 
 
 Still more impressive are the exhibitions of high moral 
 excellence. 
 
 The noble bearing of the three Hebrews, when threatened 
 with instant death unless they would worship the golden 
 image of the king of Babylon, is a fine illustration of the 
 morally sublime. " 0, Nebuchadnezzar, we are not care- 
 ful to answer thee in this matter. If it be so, our God 
 whom we serve is able to deliver us, and he will deliver ua 
 out of thy hand, king ! But if not, be it known unto 
 thee, C king, that we will not serve thy Gods, nor wor- 
 fibip the golden image which thou hast set up." 
 
 The description by Horace of a man of steadfast purTX>8€ 
 $xx\ incorruptible integrity, has for ages called fonfa thi 
 tdmiration of scholars : 
 
 •• Justam et tenacem propositi virutn 
 Nob civium ardor pr&va jubeutium. 
 
(06 
 
 lNTELL£rrUAL PHILOSOPHT. 
 
 Non vultus instantis tyranni, 
 Mente qu-ttit golida, neque Auster, 
 Dux inqukii turbidus Ha/lrifB; 
 Nee fulminautis magna m'snus Jovis. 
 Si fractus illabr.tVir orbis, 
 Impavidod ferient ruinae." 
 
 Lib. 3. Carmen 8 1-8. 
 
 An act of supposed patriotism is thus celebrated hs 
 
 IkfUMiie : 
 
 " Look then abroad throagh nature, to the range 
 Of suns and stars and adamantine spheres. 
 Wheeling unshaken through the void immense. 
 And speak, man ! does this capacious scene 
 With half that kindred majesty dilate. 
 Thy strong conception, as whtn Brutus rose 
 Refulgent from the stroke of C.Esar's fate. 
 Amid the crowd of patriots, anu his arm 
 Aloft extending, like Eternal Jova 
 When guilt brings down the thunder, called aloud 
 On Tully's name, and shook his cr.mson steel, 
 And bade the father of his country hail ! 
 For lo ! the tyrant prostrate in the aust. 
 And Rome is free again." 
 
 1 adduce this passage without any sympathy with its 
 ethical sentiments, and merely as an examph of the power 
 of supposed patriotism to awaken emotion. It is a con- 
 spicuous instance of the power of love of country to 
 ennoble, for the moment, assassination itself How different 
 is the type of moral sublimity revealed to us in the New 
 Testament ! For example, I need only refer to the dying 
 priyer of Jesus, "Father, forgive them, for they know not 
 what they do ! " The reply of our Lord to the soldier who 
 amote him has always seemed to me eminently sublime : 
 "If 1 have done evil, bear witness of the evil; but if 
 well, why smitest thou me ? " 
 
 The effect produced upon us either by material qualities 
 or immaterial energies is greatly increased by contrast. A 
 large object seems larger, and a small object smaller, when 
 
IMMATERIAL OBJECTS OF TASTE. 401 
 
 placed in ju':taposition. A beautiful form appears m >!« 
 beautiful by contrast with deformity. Lofty disinterest d- 
 ness is more sublime when opposed to meanness, and bravry 
 when contrasted with pusillanimity. Of this princijde ar- 
 tists of every profession, wherever it is possible, avail th( m- 
 Bclves. We thus see youth and old age introduced into the 
 same group, in an historical painting, wildness and cultiva- 
 tion into the same landscape. So, in romance and trage ly, 
 characters of the most opposite elements are brought into 
 contact, to deepen the impression produced by both. Tl us, 
 Brutus and Cassius, Othello and lago, Duncan and Macbi thj 
 add greatly to the impression of each other. Instances of 
 the same kind may be given without number. 
 
 It is universally observed that the external indicationr of 
 the benevolent affections, or of those which we recognia ) as 
 beautiful, are themselves beautiful ; while those which in- 
 dicate the malevolent affections are displeasing. Hence, we 
 frequently meet a person whose countenance, without a sijtgle 
 beautiful feature, is remarkably agreeable, simply by rer-son 
 of the expression. In other cases, when the features them- 
 selves are beautiful, they fail to impress us favo/ably, be- 
 cause they are disfigured by the indications of meanness, 
 Belfishness, passion, or treachery. Hence it is that moral 
 and intellectual cultivation have so powerful an effect in im- 
 proving the human countenance. It is only when the ma- 
 terial and spiritual elements are united, that we observe the 
 highest style of human beauty. We can thus readily dis- 
 tinguish the works of a first-rate artist. A sculptor or a 
 painter may be able to delineate a form of faultless propor- 
 tions, and yet only attain to mediocrity in his profession. 
 He who to skill in delineation adds the power of expreosing 
 the indications of intellectual and moral character, is alone 
 destined to the immortality which the arts of design can 
 confer. It is one thing to copy a model, and is a verj* <iif 
 
403 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 feiervt thing to Ibrm a conception of character, and, then, td 
 represent it in marble, or on canvas, so that we reprodace th< 
 same conception in the mind of every beholder. 
 
 Some of the innocent and painful emotions, as sorrow, 
 grief, regret, disappointment, may be agreeable objects of 
 taste, in their external manifestations. Here, however, m 
 cautious line of discrimination must be observed. As soon 
 as emotions become intense, thej cease to be pleasant to the 
 beholder. Thus, the external indication of sadness may 
 render a beautiful countenance more attractive ; but the 
 distortion produced by convulsive grief is unpleasant. 
 Ilence, he who is overwhelmed by calamity, and is obliged 
 to give utterance to his emotion in sobs and weeping, covera 
 his fiice, or retires from the view of otliers. The same re- 
 mark, in fact, applies to all the emotions. A smile may be 
 pleasing in an historical picture, but a broad grin, or wide- 
 mouthed laughter, would be intolerable. In reference to 
 this subject, Dr. Moore, in his " View of Society and Man- 
 ners in Italy," objects to the conception of tiie celebrated 
 group of Laocoon. He aflfirms that the physical agony 
 expiessed in the contortion of the features and limbs of the 
 parent and children, as they writhe within the folds of the 
 seipents, is too intense to be contemplated without positive 
 pain, and that, therefore, the effect of the group is distress- 
 ing and, of course, unpleasant. The artist has exhibited 
 his conception with admirable skill ; the flmlt is in the con- 
 seption itself. 
 
 BHCTION IV — THE EMOTION OF TASTE ; OR TASTE CON- 
 SIDERED SUBJECTIVELY. 
 
 The emotion of taste, or that state of mind of which we 
 tre sonscious when we contemplate any object of unusuft] 
 
TASTE CONSIDERED SUBJECTIVELY. 409 
 
 leetbetic power, is exceedingly simple. Every one knowa 
 what it is, yet it is impossible to analyze, and difficult to de- 
 BCi ibe it. It is not connected by necessity with any result. 
 Sometimes we may desire to possess the object, as, fcr in- 
 stance, a picture that pleases us ; but this desire is by no 
 means universal. Who ever desired to own the falls of 
 Niagara '? Nor does the possession of a beautiful object in- 
 crease the pleasure which it gives us. The traveller through 
 a beautiful country enjoys the scenery around him just aa 
 much as if it were his own. 
 
 Th(5 emotion of gratified taste is eminently pleasing. To 
 be assured of this, we need only observe the sacrifices which 
 men undergo to obtain it. We travel hundreds of miles, at 
 great personal inconvenience, and are satisfied if, at the 
 end, we can look upon a magnificent cataract, or spend a 
 few days amid scenes of picturesque beauty. What mil- 
 lions have been attracted to Italy to survey the creations of 
 art which adorn the crumbling tomb of that " lone mother 
 of dead empires ! " And, if we look upon the world around 
 us, we shall be surprised at the vastness of the expense in- 
 curred in the gratification of taste. We do not spend much 
 on mere specimens of art. but when anything is demanded 
 by utility, we are willing to treble the cost, if it also gratifies 
 our love for the beautiful. 
 
 The emotion of taste, like the objects which excite it, 
 is of a twofold character — that produced by the beautiful, 
 and that by the sublime. The distinction easily unfolda 
 itself to our consciousness. Every one knows that the 
 emotion produced by a parterre of flowers, a jet d'eau, is un- 
 like that produced by the sight of the ocean in a storm, a 
 magnificent mountain, the Parthenon of Athens, or the 
 pyramids of Egypt. Both are emotions of taste. Both 
 arc eminently sources of pleasure. The character of the 
 one may, however, be readily distinguished from the otbe^ 
 85 
 
^10 D^TELLECTLAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 No sharp line of discrimination can, however, be drAWt 
 between the classes of objects which give r'se to these dif- 
 ferent emotions. In many cases, they insensibly blend with 
 eacb other. A river at its commencement, and for a pcr- 
 tisn of its course, is simply beautiful. "When it pours itself 
 into the ocean, like the Mississippi or Amazon, it becomes 
 an object of sublimity. It may be, however, impossi])le to 
 designate the point at which one quality ends, and the other 
 begins. The same is true of immaterial qualities. An act 
 of kindness, compassion, or gratitude, is generally beauti- 
 ful, while a conspicuous act of justice is sublime. These, 
 however, may be reversed. A trifling or graceful act of 
 justice may be beautiful ; an act of godlike compassion, a^ 
 the death on the cross, is passing sublime. 
 
 We may observe a difference in the character of these 
 emotions, and in the sentiments with which they harmonize 
 The emotion of beauty is calm, moderately exhilarating, at- 
 tractive, and harmonizes with all the bland and social affec- 
 tions, whether grave or gay. The emotion of the subhme 
 is exciting, engrossing, filling the mind with awe, some- 
 times with terror, and associating with grave resolves and 
 momentous and soul-stirring action. Thus ornament may 
 increase the hilarity of a ball-room, or it may add deeper 
 impressiveness to the sadness of the tomb. The sublime 
 may add intensity to the emotion which impels us to heroic 
 achievement, or, overpowering all our faculties, may over- 
 whelm us with sudden amazement. 
 
 The emotion of taste is commonly transient. Its object 
 being to give us pleasure, the impression which it creates ia 
 easily efiaced by collision with the sterner realities of life. 
 It is, in its nature, evanescent. An object that pleases us 
 to-day, will affect us less powerfully to-morrow, and, if it be 
 continually in our presence, will soon cease to affect us at 
 all Persons living in the vicinity "f he most magnificcui 
 
TASTE CONSIDERED SUBJECTIVELY. 411 
 
 BcetiCry, view it without emotion. From this fad, the ar- 
 tist finds it necessary to employ every means in his powci 
 to deepen the impression which he designs to create. The 
 manner in which this is done must depend upon the meana 
 at his disposal The painter, in his representation, ia 
 limited to a single moment of time. In forming his con- 
 ception, he must, theiefore, arrange every circumstance of 
 his picture, so that it shall on that instant conduce to tho 
 principal effect. In language, we are not thus limited, and 
 may accomplish our result by means of repeated impres- 
 sions. As, however, the mind affected bj one object would 
 be less affected by another precisely similar, it becomes 
 necessary to arrange every circumstance climactically, so 
 that the emotion first excited may be rendered at every step 
 more intense. The effect of such an arrangement is beau- 
 tifully illustrated by Shakspearc in the following passage '. 
 
 " Knew ye not Pompey ? Many a time and oft 
 Have ye climbed up to walls and battlements. 
 To towers and windows, yea to window tops, 
 Your infants in your arms, and there have sat 
 The livelong day, in patient expectation, 
 To see great Pompey pass the streets of Rom© 
 And when you saw his chariot but appear. 
 Have you not made an universal shout, 
 That Tiber trembled underneath his banks, 
 To hear the replication of your sounds 
 Made in his concave shores ? " 
 
 Julius C-ssab, Act 1, Scene 1. 
 
 for the same reason novelty adds greatly to the ipo^^t 
 of an ajsthetic conception. The most beautiful object bj 
 ref etition becomes incapable of moving us. Hence we are 
 Bf^cially gratified with a new illustration, an unexpected 
 resemblance or contrast, or any object, either of beauty oi 
 sublimity, which meets us for the first time. Hence tni 
 power of a mind that looks uj.ca a subject by its own light 
 
11^ INTELLB-.TUAL PniLOSOPHl. 
 
 end discovers new relations that have escaped the obser ration 
 of others. Such writers, even with many defects, will al- 
 ways please ; while he who is content to be an imitator, may 
 be faultlessly correct, and inimitably proper, but he comes t^i 
 il: with a thrice-told tale, and leaves us wholly unaffected. 
 
 Wit \^ ojenerally mentioned as on*^ of the objects by whi^ 
 the emotion of taste is excited. It seems to me but partially 
 connected with the subject, and therefore cannot here claim 
 any separate discussion. In the place of any analysis of 
 its nature and effects, I shall merely quote the following 
 passage from Dr. Barrow as the best description of wit and 
 its modes of affecting us with which I am acquainted. 
 
 " Sometimes it lieth in pat allusion to a known story, or 
 in seasonable application of a trivial saying, or in forging 
 an apposite tale : sometimes it playeth in words and phrases, 
 taking advantage from the ambiguity of their sense, or the 
 affinity of their sound : sometimes it is lodged in a sly ques- 
 tion, in a smart answer, in a quirkish reason, in a shrewd 
 intimation, in cunningly diverting or cleverly retorting an 
 objection : sometimes it is concealed in a bold scheme of 
 speech, in a tart irony, in a lusty hyperbole, in a startling 
 metaphor, in a plausible reconciling of contradictions, or in 
 acute nonsense : sometimes a scenical representation of per- 
 sons or things, a counterfeit speech, a mimical look or ges- 
 ture passeth for it : sometimes an affected simplicity, some- 
 times a presumptuous bluntness, giveth it being : sometimes 
 it risoth from a lucky hitting upon what is strange, some- 
 times from a crafty wresting obvious matter to the purpose : 
 </trn it consisteth in one knows not what, and springeth up 
 one knows not how. Its ways are unaccountable and inex- 
 plicable, being answerable to the rovings of fancy and the 
 windings of language. It is, in short, a manner of speak- 
 ing out of the plain way, which, by a pretty and surprising 
 uncouthness in conceit or expression, doth affect and amusa 
 
TASTE CONSIDERED SUBJECTIVELY. 41!} 
 
 tte fancy, stirring in it some wonder, and breeding some 
 delight thereto. It raiseth admiration, as signifying a nimbl« 
 sagacity of apprehension, a special felicity of invention, a 
 vivacity of spirit and reach of wit more than vulgar. It 
 seemeth to argue a rare quickness of parts, that one can 
 fetch in remote conceits applicable ; a notable skill, that ho 
 can dexterously accommodate them to the purpose befDre 
 him, together with a lively briskness of humor not apt to 
 dash those sportful flashes of the imagination. It also pro- 
 cureth delight by gratifying curiosity with its rareness or 
 gemblance of difficulty (as monsters not for their beauty but 
 their rarity ; as juggling tricks, not for their use but their 
 abstruseness, are beheld with pleasure), by diverting the mind 
 from its road of serious thoughts, by instilling gayety and 
 airiness of spirit in way of emulation or complaisance ; and 
 by seasoning matters, otherwise distasteful or insipid, with 
 an unusual and thence grateful tang." — Sermon against 
 Foolish Talking and Jesting. 
 
 A few remarks on the improvement of taste may be 
 appropriate to the close of this chapter. 
 
 I have said above that taste is that sensibility by which 
 we recognize the beauties and deformities of nature and art, 
 derivini' pleasure from the one, and suifering pain from the 
 other. From this definition it is evident that the function 
 of taste is two-fold ; first, it discriminates between beauty 
 and deformity, and, secondly, it is a source of pleasure and 
 pain. Cultivation improves it in both these respects. It 
 renders us better capable of distinguishing between beauty 
 and deformity in their nore delicate shades of difference; 
 and, as this power of discrimination is improved, the pleas- 
 ure which we derive from gratified taste becomes mora 
 exquisite and enduring, and the pain which we suffer fioia 
 deformity- is, in a corresponding degree, increased. 
 
 When we speak of the improvement of taste, the qtieatm 
 35* 
 
Hi INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 naturally arises, How may we know when onr taste is iai- 
 proved / The taste of men varies greatly under different 
 circumstances. The taste of childhood differs from that of 
 youth, and that of youth ftom manhood. The taste of 
 savages in all ages is unlike that of civilized man. And 
 imcng nations that have made the greatest progress inci\il- 
 ization and refinement, we find that there have been great 
 diversities in this respect. The taste of Egypt was exceed- 
 ingly different from that of Greece. The taste of Greece 
 and Rome were by no means identical. Neither of them 
 bore any resemblance to the taste of India. Or, if we draw 
 nearer to the present time, the taste of the Mahommedana 
 was very dissimilar to that of the Catholics of the middle 
 ages. And we perceive corresponding difference at the 
 present day. The taste in architecture of France, Ger- 
 many, Italy, and Great Britain, is by no means identical 
 The same remaiks apply to poetry and the other fine arts. 
 
 Hence the question has frequently arisen, Is there any 
 standard of taste 7 Are there any canons to which we may 
 appeal when a difference of opinion exists, or by which we 
 may be guided in our attempts at self-cultivation ? It may 
 be worth while briefly to examine this question. 
 
 If by a standard of taste be meant a system of arbitrary 
 rules, established by reasonings or dictated by authority, to 
 which all the works of art must conform, and by reference 
 to which their merit must be decided, it is manifest that no 
 Euch standard exists. Who ever established it 7 By wliat 
 course of reasonings were its principles demonstrated? Who 
 was ever competent to decide for all men, at all times ; and 
 to -^-hose decisions have men ever yielded implicit submission '^ 
 It is obvious that such a standard does not and cannot exist. 
 
 But, if, by a standard of taste, it be meant that on a great 
 rariety of questions in aesthetics there is a general agree- 
 ment of mankind in all ages, and among all nations, of tha 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF TASTE. 41 S 
 
 Kime or of similar degrees of culture, and that th p agree 
 ment having been observed, many general laws may be 
 deduced from it by which the artist may be safely governed, 
 and by which we may all test the accuracy of our individual 
 decisions, then we must answer this question in the affirma- 
 tive. No one will doubt that some forms, colors, and pro- 
 portions, are more agreeable to mankind than others ; that 
 some positions are graceful, and others awkward ; that some 
 modes of thought and expression give us pleasure, and othera 
 give us pain. If mankind are made with similar faculties, 
 such must be the result. Although nations may differ widely 
 in their decisions at a particular time yei intercourse with 
 eacti other and progress in civilization tend to unanimity of 
 opinion even on questions upon which there existed at first 
 great diversity. Thus, when Greece and Rome came into 
 contact, Greece asserted her superiority over her conqueror, 
 and every Roman artist and poet copied with even servile 
 fidelity the models which were brought from the city of Peri- 
 cles. It is the object of the artist to observe these general 
 facts, not for the purpose of giving laws to nature, but of 
 recording the laws which nature has herself established. 
 Just so far as these laws have been discovered, they become 
 the standard to which the artist must conform if he desirea 
 to succeed, that is, to please humanity. 
 
 It would seem, then, that in our inquiries on this sub- 
 ject we are merely determining a question of fact. We ask 
 what aesthetiial forms have been found universally to please 
 mankind, or rather that portion of mankind whose circum- 
 stances have been favorable to a correct decision 1 "When 
 lliis pestion has been answered, we are to receive it as an 
 ultimate fact. Tliat which human nature pronounces to be 
 txjautiful is beautiful to man, and that which it pronounces 
 deformed is deformed. We may, it is true, with advantage 
 frequently analyze a complicated decision, ir order to deter* 
 
416 INTBLLECTUAL PHtLGiOPHT. 
 
 mine with more accuracy the particular elements on w'hick 
 it is founded, and thus arrive at a simpler and more general 
 law. Thus, the voice of mankind has pronounced the epic 
 of Ilomer to be beautiful. This decision cannot be ques- 
 tioned. We may, however, examine it^ to determine the 
 qualities on which this decision is founded. There is the 
 general plot, the delineation of character, the description of 
 events, the vivacity of dramatic action, the language and 
 rhythmical power, the machinery or intervention of the 
 gods, the quarrels of the chiefs, the catalogue of the ships, 
 the lists of the slain, the slaughtering of animals, and the 
 culinary arrangements of the chiefs. We may certainly 
 analyze this complex variety of elements, and determine 
 which is essential and which injurious to the general effect 
 In this manner we are enabled to ascertain what it is that 
 pleases mankind, and thus form a more definite idea of the 
 standard of poetic excellence. 
 
 Our labor here, however, consists mainly in analysis. 
 We may examine separately the various elements of success 
 or failure, but we cannot reason from them with any decided 
 confidence. Because a particular form is beautiful in one 
 position, we cannot determine that it will please under all 
 circumstances. Because a particular combination of form 
 is beautiful, we can/iot determine what will be the effect of 
 an entirely opposite combination. An artist of originality 
 may repose a reasonable confidence in his own sensibilities, 
 but he can never be sure that a conception will please^ until 
 he has submitted it to the judgment of mankind. 
 
 Writers on this subject, of distinguished ability, have con- 
 tended that there is no established relation betAveen the 
 numan sensibility and the external world, by which we are 
 entitled to say that anything is in itself beautiful. They 
 afiirm that our idea jf beauty is merely derived from asso- 
 tiation. In reply to this assertion, it may be remarked thai 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF TASTE. 4 Pi 
 
 OUT own consciousness testifies clearly to tie character of the 
 emotion of taste. It may clearly be distinguished from 
 every other emotion, and also from every act of the imagi- 
 nation, the reason, or any ot our other faculties. It differs 
 from them all in its nature, its origin, and its results. If, 
 then, it be an original and peculiar affection of the mind, 
 its existence need not and cannot be accounted for by asso- 
 ciation. As Mr. Stewart very appositely remarks : " The 
 theory which resolves the whole effect of the beautiful into 
 association, must necessarily involve that species of paralo- 
 gism to which logicians have given the name of reasoning 
 in a circle. It is the province of association to impart to 
 one thing the agreeable or disagreeable effect of another ; 
 but association can never account for the origin of a class 
 of pleasures different in kind from all the others we kno\T. 
 If there was nothing originally pleasing or beautiful, the asso- 
 ciating principle would have no material on which to operate." 
 
 As to the manner in which this faculty may be improved, 
 but little can be said in addition to what was remarked when 
 treating of the imagination. Both faculties are employed 
 upon the same objects, and the mode of cultivation is in 
 most respects the same. A few brief suggestions are all that 
 I shall here offer. 
 
 It is universally admitted that all the forms of nature 
 possess some portion of aesthetic power. As we become 
 familiar with these, and hold communion with nature in all 
 her aspects, whether grave or gay, beautiful or sublime, we 
 cultivate our lesthetic sensibility, we more readily recognize 
 the beautiful, and rejoice in it with more exquisite emotions. 
 
 We shall also derive great benefit from studying with 
 Cfiro classical productions in the various departments of the 
 fine arts. When an artist has been eminently successful, he 
 has united in one conception all the elements of the beauti- 
 ful within his power, excluding from it all that could dii- 
 
418 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 tract the attention or diminish the effect. Hence, if W6 
 comprehend his design, understand his mode of developing 
 it, and meditate upon his work, until Ave sympathize with 
 his sentiments and share in his enthusiasm, our taste will 
 become in some measure assimilated to his. He who has 
 caught the inspiration of Raphael must possess already the 
 spiritual element of a painter; and he who can feel the 
 Bentiuients wliich inspired Milton and Shakspeare, must be 
 endowed with some portion at least of poetic genius 
 
 If, however, we desire to improve our taste, we must dc 
 it not by the indiscriminate study of models, but only by 
 the contemplation of the most eminent. We m.ust confine 
 ourselves to the most faultless models if we would cultivate 
 our love for the beautiful. If the student would form a 
 classical style, and acquire a discriminating love for literary 
 excellence, he must limit his reading to the works of those 
 whom the suffrages of humanity have numbered among the 
 masters of thought and expression. A vast amount of mis- 
 cellaneous reading may enable us to abound in small knowl- 
 edge and flippant criticism. It is only by communion with 
 those whose works " the world will not T^illingly let die," 
 that we learn to emulate their intellectual achievements, and 
 become the instructors of our fellow-men. 
 
 In studying the works of others for our own improve- 
 ment, one caution is however to be observed. They are the 
 productions of- fallible men like ourselves. We are, there- 
 fore, to bring to the examination of every work of art, the 
 exercise of a calm, discriminating judgment, prepared to 
 distinguish beauty from deformity wherever they exist. We 
 must exercise our own taste, if we would cultivate our sen- 
 sitive nature. When we study the woiks of others to 
 awaken our own sensibilities, to correct our errors, and to 
 arouse ourselves to emulation, we develop our own faculties. 
 But if we study only to bow before a master as we would 
 
IMPROVEMENT OF TASTE. 41^ 
 
 w^aaI.jv cur Creator, we become servile copyists and de. 
 graded i"^o';»fefS. It is not imj'OSaible that our veneration 
 for the airionto hus in some degree pro<iuced tliis effect 
 upon modern literature. I have always been struck with 
 the remarV of one of the Italian masters, who, when a work 
 of an ear}.er artist v/as spoken of with servile adoration, 
 turned away and said, " I too am a painter." To study 
 the works of others that we may be able to equal them, cul- 
 tivates the power of original creation. To study them only 
 tliat we may learn how to do feebly, what they have done 
 well, is fatal to all manly developmc^iit^ and must consign 
 an individual or an age tc the poaitwn of despairing and 
 wondering mediocri^. 
 
APPENLIX. 
 
 Note to pagbs 101, 102. 
 It '« stated in the text that, under certain abnormal circuiDBtances, m 
 become capable of perceptions, or cognitions, without the aid of the e-giina 
 of sense. While I was lecturing on this subject, a few years since, one of 
 my pupils informed me of some facts, of a very decided character, in pos- 
 iession of his brother, J. M. Brooke, Esq., of the United Stiites Navy. At 
 my request he wrote to his brother, stating my wish for information. Mr. 
 Brooke soon after very kindly wrote to me as follows ■ 
 
 Washington, Oct. 27, 1851 
 Sir : It affords me pleasure to comply with your reiiuest. made through 
 my brother William, relative to some experinieiits performed on board of 
 the U. S. steamer Princeton, in tlie latter purt of the year 1847 ; she being 
 then on a cruise in the ^Mediterranean. Nathaniel Bishop, the subject of 
 the experiments, was a mulatto, about twenty-six years of age, in goo«J 
 health, ))ut of an esitable disposition. The first experiment was of the 
 mafowtic or mesmeric sleep, which overpowered him in thirty minutes 
 from tlie commencement of passes made in the ordinary way, accompanied 
 with a steadfast gaze and effort of will that he should sleep. 
 
 In this state he was insensible to all voices but mine, unless I directed 
 or willed him to hear others ; he was also insensible to such amount of 
 pain as one might inflict without injury, that is, what would have been 
 pain to another. He would obey my directions to whistle, dance, or sing. 
 When aroused from this sleep he had no recollection of what occurred 
 while in it. That such an influence could be exerted I was already aware 
 havir.g previously witnessed satisfiictory experiments. Of clairvoyance I 
 had never been convinced ; indeed, considered it nothing more than a sort 
 of dreaming produced by the will of the operator. I became aware of ita 
 truth rather through accident than design. 
 
 It happene<^i one day that some one of my brother officers asked a ques- 
 tion which the others could not answer. Bishop, who had been a few 
 Eomeiits before in a mesmeric sleep, gave the desired information, speak- 
 ing with confidence and apparent accuracy. As the information related to 
 something? wliioh it seemed almost impossilile to know without seeing, we 
 wtre very much surprised. It struck me that he might be clairvoyant :, 
 and I at once asked him to tell me the time by a watch kept in the binn*. 
 ole, on the spar or upper deck, we being on the berth or lower deck. H« 
 MiBwered correctly, as I found upon looking at the watch, allowing eight 
 
422 APPENDIX. 
 
 or nine seconds for time o:;cupie(l in getting on deck. I then askeJ hta 
 
 many qiestions with regard to objects at a di.stance, which he answered 
 ami, as far as I coulJ asutTtain, cori'ectly. 
 
 Foi' cKaniple, one evening, wliile at anchor in the port of Genoa, th« 
 captain was on shore. I askel Bishop, in tiie presence of several tiffiorrs, 
 where the captain then was. He replies], " At the opera with Mi'. Lester, 
 the consul." " What dues he say ? " I inquired. Bishop appeared to 
 listen, an<l in a moment replied, " The captain tells Mr. Lester that he waj 
 much please.1 with the port of Xavia ; that the authorities treated him 
 Tjith much consideration." 
 
 Upon this, one of the officers laughed, and said that when the captain 
 returned he would ask hi;n. He did so ; saying, " Captain, we havt loen 
 listening to your conversation on shore." " Very well," remarked the 
 captain. " What did I say ? " expecting some jest. The officer then re~ 
 peated what the captain had said of Xavia and its authorities. " Ah," 
 Bail the captain, "who was at the opera? I did no', see any of tL« 
 officers there." The lieutenant then explained the matter. The captain 
 confirmed its truth, and seemed very much surprised, as there had been 
 no other communication with the shore during the evening. I maj 
 remark that we had touched at several ports between Xavia and Genoa. 
 
 • On another occasion, an officer being on shore, I directed Bishop to 
 examine his pockets ; he made several motions with his hands, as if 
 actually drawing something from the officer's pockets, saying, " Here is a 
 handkerchief, and here a box — what a curious thing ! — full of little white 
 Bticks with blue ends. What are they, Mr. Brooke.'' " I replied, " Per- 
 haps they are matches." "So they are!" he exclaimed. My com- 
 panions, expecting the officer mentioned, went on deck, and meeting hira 
 at the gangway, asked, " What have you in your pockets.'" "Noth- 
 ing/' he replied. " But have you not a box of matches ? " " 0, yes ! " 
 said he. " How did you know it ? I bought them just before I came on 
 board." The matches were peculiar, made of white wax with blue ends. 
 
 The surgeons of the Princeton ridiculed these experiments, upon which 
 I requested one of them (Farquharson), to test for himself, which he con- 
 eented to do. With some care he placed Bishop and myself in one corner 
 of the apartment, and then took a position some ten feet distxnt, conceal- 
 ing between his hands a watch, the long second-hand of which traversed 
 the dial. He first asked for a description of the watch. To which Bishop 
 replied, " 'Tis a funny watch, the second-hand jumps." 
 
 The doctor then asked him to tell the minute and second, which he did ; 
 directly afterwards exclaiming, " The second-hand has stopped ! " which 
 was the case. Dr. F. having stopped it. " Well," said the doctor, " to 
 what second does it point, and to what hour ; and what minute is it now ? " 
 Bishop answered correctly, adding, " 'T is going again." He then told 
 twice in succession the minute and second. 
 
 The doctor was convinced, saying that it was contrary to reason, but 
 te must believe. I then proposed that the doctor should mark time ; and 
 dir»^ctod Bishop to look in his mother's house in LaEcaster, Pa (where he 
 bad never been), for a cluck ; he said there was one there, and told the 
 time l)y it ; one of the officers calculated the ditference in time for the 
 longitudes of Lancaster and Genoa, and the clock was found to agre€ 
 witiiin five minutes of thp watch time. 
 
 ' Several persons being still unconvinced, I pioposed that the captais 
 should select a letter from the files in his cabin and put it on the cahia 
 labU ; and that Bishop should read it withe ut leaving an apartmeot oa 
 
APPENDI2. 428 
 
 Um deCK below the cabin, and some distance forwfirJ of it. Upon this th« 
 eaptjiin sent for me, and telling me tliiit all the discipline in tlie soi-vic* 
 would be destroyed, ordered me to discontinue the practice. A* liisiiop 
 retaineil his power of clairvoyance, I often amused myself in ^oml nt;; liira 
 to the Unitevl t^tateS; and, although I cannot assert that lie always told the 
 truth, 1 believe that in many instances he did so, as I have si'iprisetl per 
 •ous when relating to them for confirmation such experiments in clair- 
 voyance as concerned actions unknown, as tiiey supposed, to auj one bul 
 themselves. 
 
 As it was in my power to control Bishop in his wandtnnas, I u«uaUj 
 limited his powers of observation, and meddled only so far in the atlai-g 
 of my neighbors as might be honorable. 
 
 The power which I acquired by putting him to sleep remained after I s 
 woke, and was increased by its exercise. If not exerted for several daj 9 
 it decreased, sometimes rendering it necessary to repeat the passes an! 
 again put him to sleep. While awake and under my influence, I mado 
 many experiments, such as arresting his arm when raising food to hia 
 mouth, or fixing him motionless in the attitude of drinking. On ono 
 occasion I willed that he should continue pouring tea into a cup already 
 fiill, which he did, notwithstanding the exclamations of those who were 
 scalded in the operation. These influences were exerted without a woi'd 
 or change of position on my part. He remembered or forgot what he saw 
 when clairvoyant, as I willed, of which I satisfied myself by experiment. 
 
 All his senses were under control, so completely, indeed, that had X 
 fnlle<l him to stop breathing I believe that be would. You may wish 'o 
 Kow something more with regard to my experience ; if so, I shall bf 
 > appy to inform you. I am, sir, respectfully. 
 
 Your obedient servant, 
 
 J. M. Bbookx. 
 
 Db. Watlaxd. 
 
 Providence, R. J 
 
 Note to page 115 
 
 When treating on the subject of consciousness, I have referred tc tht 
 Bict of double consciousness, and alluded to two or three cases which havf 
 been published. Within a few days, a case has been brought to my notic* 
 by my former pupil, S. P. Bates, Esq., of Meadville, Penn., which haf 
 seemed to me more remarkable than any that I have met with elsewhere. 
 Mr. Bates, at my request, procured me a narrative, written by the patient 
 herself. I give it in her own words, omitting only such pa.s,9ages as aid 
 toihing^ tc thr itifinsic value of the relation. The extracts are fr^im a 
 htter addressed to her nephew, Rev. John V. Reynolds : 
 
 Mt dear Nephkw : I will now endeavor to give you a brief account of 
 nyself. When at tlie age of eighteen or twenty, I was occasionally aflSicted 
 with fits. In t'.ie spring of 1811, I had a very severe one. My frame was 
 greatly convulsed, and I was extremely ill "or several Jays. My sight and 
 h« iring were totally lost, and, during twelve woeks from the time of th« 
 ft mentioned, I continued in a very feeble state. But, at the end of fiv« 
 
124 APPENDIX. 
 
 weeks, the senses cf sight at^d hearing were again restored But a miW 
 remarkable visitation of Providence awaited ue. A little before the ex- 
 piration of the twelve weeks, ou's morning, when I awoke, I had lost all 
 recollection of everything. My understanding with an imperfect knowl 
 edge of speech remained ; but my father, mother, brothers and sisters. 
 and the neighbors, were altogether strangers to me. I had no disposition 
 to converse either with my friends or with strangers. I had forgotten the 
 use of written language, and did not know a single letter of the alphabet, 
 mor how to discharge the duties of my domestic employment, more than a 
 new-born babe. I presently, however, began to learn various kinds of 
 knowledge. 
 
 I continued five weeks in this way, when I suddenly passed from this 
 ■econd state (as, for distinction, it mj^y be called), into my first state. 
 All consciousness of the five weeks just eiapsed was totally gone, and my 
 original consciousness was fully restored. My kindred and friends were 
 at once recognized. Every kind of knowledge which I had ever acquired 
 was as much at my command as at any former period of my life ; but of 
 the tune, and of all events, which had transpired during my second state, 
 I had not the most distant idea. For three weeks I continued in my first 
 State. But in my sleep the transition was renewed, and I awoke in my 
 second state. As before, so now, all knowledge acquired in my first 
 state was forgotten, and of the circumstances of the three weeks' lucid 
 interval, I had no conception. Of the small fund of knowledge I had 
 gained in my former second state I was able to avail myself, and I con- 
 tinued from day to day to add to this little treasure. 
 
 From the spring of 1811, till within eight or ten years ago, I continued 
 frequently changing from my first to second, and from my second to first 
 State. More than three quarters of the time I was in the second state. 
 There never was any periodical regularity as to the transitions. Some- 
 times I continued several months, and sometimes a few weeks, a few days, 
 or only a few hours, in my second state ; but in the hipse of five years I, 
 in no one instance, continued more than twenty days in my first state. 
 
 Whatever knowledge I acquired at any time in my second state became 
 familiar to me when in that state, and I made such proficiency, that I soon 
 became as well acquainted with things, and was in general as intelligent 
 in my second as in my first state. I went through the usual process of 
 learning to write, and took as much satisfaction in the use of books as in 
 my first state. Your father undertook to reteach me chirograpliy. Ha 
 gave me my name, which he had written, to copy. I took my pen, though 
 in a very awkward manner, and actually began from the right to the left 
 in the Hebrew mode. It was not long before I obtained tolerable skill in 
 penmanship, and often amused myself in writing poetry. I acquired all 
 kinds of knowledge in my second state, with much greater facility than a 
 perain who had never been instructed. 
 
 In my second state I was introduced to many persons whom I always 
 recognized in that state (and no one enjoyed the society of friends better 
 than I did), but if ever so well known to me, in my first state, I had no 
 knowledge of them in the second, until an acquaintance had been again 
 formed. In like manner all acquaintances formed in the second state. 
 must be formed in the first in order to be known in that. 
 
 These transitions always took place in my sleep. In passing from my 
 •econd to my first state, nothing was particularly noticeable in my sleep 
 But in passing from my first to second state, my sleep was so pi-ofouni 
 Ihat no ono could awaken me. and it not unfre ^ueutly continued eighteei 
 
AiTENDIX. 
 
 425 
 
 «r twenij hoars. had generally some presentiment »f the change fol 
 •everal days before the eve -it. 
 
 My sufferings, in tiie near prospect of the transition from either the one or 
 tho other state, were extreme, particularly from thefirnt to the second state 
 When about to undergo the ciiange I was harassed with fear lest I shouli 
 never revert so as to know again in this world those who were dear to mt 
 My feelings in this respect were not unlike those of one who was abouc tfl 
 be separated by death, thougli, in the second state, I did not anticipate tlie 
 change with such distressing apprehensions as in the first. I was natu^ 
 rail/ cheerful, but more so in this than in my natural state. I believe I 
 felt perfectly free from trouble when in my second state, and, for some 
 time after I had been in that state, my feelings were such that, had all my 
 friends been lying dead around me, I do not think it would have given me 
 one moment's pain of mind. At that time my feelings were never mov.;d 
 vith the manifestation of joy or sorrow. I had no idea of the past or tiie 
 future. Nothing but the present occupied my mind. In the first stage 
 of the disease, I had no i-iea of employing my time in anything tiu)t waa 
 useful. I did nothing but ramble about, and never tired walking about 
 the fields. My mother, oi:e day, thought siie would try to rouse me ii 
 little. She told me that Paul says those who would not work, must not 
 eat. I told her it made no matter of difference to me what Paul said, 1 
 was not going to work for Paul or any other person. I did not know who 
 Paul was then. I had no knowledge of the Bible at that time. 
 
 As an evidence of my ignorance of any kind of danger in that early 
 period, befoie I had attained any information of right or wrong, dinger 
 or safety, as I was, one afternoon, walking a short distance from the house, 
 I discovered, as I thought, a beautiful creature. Insensible of danger, I 
 ran to it, and, in attempting to take hold of it, it eluded my grasp by 
 running under a pile of logs. It was a rattlesnake. I had my hand upon 
 the rattle ; but fortunately my foot slipped and I fell back. I heard it 
 rattle, and was still very nnwillintr m go home without it. I put my arm 
 a considerable distance under the log where tlie snake had crept. 
 
 It may be remarked that whenever I changed into my natural state, I 
 always felt very much debilitated. When in my second state I had no 
 inclination for either food or sleep. My strength at such times was en- 
 tirely artificial. I generally bad a flush in one cheek, and continual 
 thirst, which denoted inward fever. 
 
 When I was last down at home I was reading some letters which I had 
 received from dear friends with whom I had corresponded previous to 
 theae changes, and who had been the companions of my younger 'lays ; 
 but their images are now entirely erase<l from my memory. It would h« 
 a source of gratification to me if I were in possession of my former recol- 
 
 luJtion. 
 
 ♦ #♦♦*♦ 
 
 In the early period of my disease I used to talk in my sleep, and tell 
 my plans. Sometimes my friejids would overliear me, wiiich wtuld cmse 
 them to watch my mo\ements, and by that means I have been saved 
 nmuy unpleasant trips in my sleep. BL^ry Rkykolds. 
 
 Note 1. iliss Reynolds could pronounce a word after any ore, bat 
 »juld at first make no use of it herself. 
 
 Note 2. The hand-writing of Miss Reynolds in her second state was U 
 gifterent from her hand-writing in the first as that of two individuals 
 86* 
 
426 APPENDIX. 
 
 Note 3, At ahout forty years of age these changes ceased, and she IitkI 
 Dn to tiie end of life in her second state. She would, of course, have nc 
 reiiiwuhrance of lier life previous to these changes. Diiring the list part 
 of her lite Miss Reynolds taught school, and proved a very sucoessfa 
 teaoher. 
 
 In aid'*:::: to the above Mr. Bates has obligingly procured for me th« 
 tlhwing tnemoranda from Rev. Mr. Reynolds : 
 
 Miss Reynolds was about forty years of age when these transi-'Jou 
 oeased. Until the time of her death, at the age of sixty-nine, slie con- 
 tinued in what sha terms her second slate. Hence, all the early part of 
 bar liti was a complete blank. Her entire disregard of danger gradually 
 dis;ippeared, until there was, in this respect, nothing remarkable. Her 
 two states were never in any measure blended. 
 
 One circumstance alluded to by Miss R. is thus stated more particularly 
 by her nephew. " It was her habit, immediately after going to sleep, — and 
 bhe usu.illy dropped asleep very soon after retiring, — to begin to recount 
 aloud tlie duties und incidents of the preceding iliy. She would go through 
 all that she hail ilone tluring the day, in the exact order in which it had 
 occurred. She would frequently stop and comment upon things that had 
 occurred, and would laugh heartily when she came to anything tha< 
 Dleased lier. 
 
 " After going through with the duties and incidents of the preceding 
 day, she would then lay her plans for the day to come. When the day 
 came, she would begin and perform everything as she had planned. It 
 seems that she was not aware of having formed any previous plan of 
 action, :is she frequently used to wonder how her friends could divine 
 what she was going to do iluring the day, as she tbund tint ti.cy evidently 
 could ilo. 'I'his h ibit was of much service to iier friends, as it enabled 
 them to foresee and prevent her from doing many acts of mischief. This 
 habit continued for more than a year." 
 
 Miss Reynolds, as I h ive mentioned, continued for nearly thirty years 
 of her life m the second state. " Slie, however-, ceased to manifest any of 
 those symptoms bordering on insanity which she exhibited during its first 
 periods. She taught school for several years, united with the church, waa 
 a coni;8tent Christian, and performed all the duties of life in a way which 
 exhib-'ed nothing else than a perfectly rational state. No person would 
 have discovered anything unusual in her manners and conversation, 
 Hierf Tas, perhaps, always rather an excessive measui'e of nervdua eroitA 
 biiUv ih.it is, an excess abcve the average." 
 
 >^ OP THE vP^ 
 
 UHIVERSI 
 
VMUmE COLLEGE TEXT-BOOKS. 
 
 KENDi^iCK'S XENOPHON'S Ai'lABASIS. 
 
 533 PasTCS. 
 Comprising the whole work, with Kiepert's Revised Map of the Route of the 
 Ten Thousand, Introduction, full though brief Notes, and complete Vocabulary, 
 ty A. C. KEN5R1CK, D. D., LL. D., Rochester University. 
 
 BULLIONS'S 
 
 LATIN-EMCLISH AND ENGLISH-LATIN DICTIONARY. 
 
 (1.258 pages.) This book has peculiar advantages in the distinLtness of the 
 marks of ihe quantitiei of Syllables, the Etyiuoloj,'y and Composition of Words, 
 Classification of Syllables, Svnonyms, and Proper Names, and a judicious 
 Abridgment of Quotations. For cheapness and utility it is unequalled. 
 
 LONG'S ATLAS OF CLASSICAL GEOG.IAPHY. 
 
 This Atlas, by George Lo.vg, M. A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Cam- 
 bridge, contains fifty -two Maps and Plans, finely engraved and neatly colored,- 
 with a Sketch of Classical Geography, and a full Index of Places. The maps, 
 shelving the ideas which the ancients had of the world at various intervals from 
 Homer to Ptolemy, and the typographical plans of ancient places, battles, 
 marches, will be of interest and advantajre ; and the Atlas will be of great help 
 to classical students, and in libraries of reference. 
 
 BAHD'S CLASSICAL MANUAL 
 
 (200 pages.) This is a student's hand-book, presenting, in a concise form, an 
 epitome of Ancient Geography, the Mythology, Antiquities, and Chronology of 
 the Greeks and Romans. 
 
 pOKER'S NEW PHYSIOLOGY. 
 
 376 Pages. 
 
 Revised, corrected, and put into the most perfect form for t3xt-book use, by J. 
 A. Sewall, M. D., of the Illinois State Norma! University. 
 
 7'//ig .\'e>f y-fiyxiolor/j has been .A>«7r E/eofrifvper7 in large-sized type, 
 usini the h\nrh-fnce<1 iiiv to bring out prominently the leading ideas. It 
 contains a full series of Qiiesiioiit at the end of the book, and a complete 
 Glossary and Tiirlex. _ 
 
 IjOPKlNS'S LECTURES ON IVIORAL SCIENCE 
 
 Delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, by M.\rk Hopkins, D. D., Pre». 
 '.d<jDt of Williams College. 
 
 Koyal 12mo, cloth. 
 
ENGLI SH LITERA TURE. 
 
 SHAW'S NEW HISTORY OF ENGLISH AND AMERICAN LIT- 
 ERATURE 
 
 404 Pages. 
 Prepared on the basis of Shaw's " Manual of English Literature," by Trumah 
 J. Backus, of Vassar College, i>i /'t?;r/e, clear fvpe , and especially airanged 
 for teaching this subject in Academies and High Schools, with copious relerences 
 to " The Choice Specimens of English and American Literature." It contams a 
 map of Britain at the close of the sixth century, showing the distribution of its 
 Celtic and Teutonic population ; also diagrams intended to aid the student in 
 remembering important classifications of authors. 
 
 CHOICE SPECIMENS OF AMERICAN LITERATURE AND 
 LITERARY READER. 
 
 818 Pages. 
 Selected from the works of American authors throughout the country, and 
 designed as a text-book, as well as Literary Reader iu advanced schools. By 
 Benj. N. Martin, D. D, L. H. D. 
 
 DE. FRANCIS WAYLAHD'S 
 
 V^LXJ^BLE SERIES, 
 
 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY {Elements of). 
 
 426 Pages. 
 By Francis Wayland, late President of Crown University. 
 This work is a standard text-bootTin Colleges and High Schools. 
 
 THE ELEMENTS OF MORAL SCIENCE. 
 
 By Francis Wayland, D. D., President of Brown University, and Professor of 
 Moral Philosophy. 
 Fiftieth Thousand. ISnio, cloth, 
 
 *** This work has been highly commended by Reviewers. Teachers, and 
 others, and has been adopted as a class-book in most of the collegiate, theologi- 
 cal, and academical institutions of the country-. 
 
 ELEMENTS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. 
 
 By Francis Wayland, D. D., President of Brown University. 
 
 Twenty-?ixth Thousand. 12mo, cloth, 
 
 ■*«* This important wo k of Dr. AVnvland'= is fast taking the place of every 
 other text-book on the subject of Political Economy in our colleges and higher 
 schools in all parts ot the country. 
 
 We publish Abridged Editions of both the .tfor/tl Soiet}oe and H^olilica. 
 £conomy, for the use of Schools and Academies. 
 
 SHELDON «& COMPANY, 
 
 NEW YOJ^IC 
 
DR. JOSEPH HAVEN'S 
 
 VALUABLE TEXT-BOOKS. 
 
 Dr. Haven's text-books are the outgrowth of his long experience 
 as a teacher. Prof. Park, of Andover, says of his Mental Philos. 
 OPHY : " It is distinguished for its clearness ef style, perspicuity of 
 method, candor of spirit, accuracy and comprehensiveness of 
 thought." 
 
 MENTAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 1 vol. 12mo. $2.00. 
 INCLUDING THE INTELLECT, THE SENS.3'LITIES, AND THE WILU 
 
 It is believed this work will be found pre-eminently distinguished for the com« 
 ^leteness with which it presents the whole subject 
 
 MORAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 INCLUDING THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ETHICS. 
 Royal 12mo, cloth, embossed. $1.73. 
 
 HISTORY OF ANCIENT AND MODERN PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Price $2.00. 
 
 Dr. Haven was a very able man and a very clear thinker. He was for many 
 years 3. professor in Amherst College, and also in Chicago University. He pos- 
 sessed the happy faculty of stating the most abstract truth in an attractive and 
 interesting form. His work en "Intellectual Philosophy" has probably had 
 and is having to-day a larger sale than any similar text-book ever published in 
 this country. 
 From GEORGE WOODS, LL. D., President Western University of Pennsylvania. 
 
 Gentlemen. Dr. Haven's History of Ancient and Modern Phi'osophy xtij>- 
 plieg n f/ieiit nrnit. It g ves such information on the subject as many stu- 
 dents and men, who have not time fully to examine a complete history, need. 
 The material is selected with good judgment, and the work is written in the au- 
 thor's attractive style. I shall recommend its use in this department of study. 
 
 From HOWARD CROSBY, D. D., LL. D., Chancellor of University of New York, 
 Messrs. Sheldon & Co. have just issued a very comprehensive and yet brief 
 survey of the History of Philosophic Thought, prepared by the late Dr. Joseph 
 Haven. It is well fitted for a college text-book. 
 
 Its divisions are logical, its sketch of each form of philosophy clear and dis- 
 criminating, and its style as readable as so condensed a work an be. I Atiotv 
 of no com/>enrrii/m whirfi r/ires ihe hirrV*-eve view of ihe history of 
 philotophy as l/iorourrhly as this hand-book of'/)r. Baven. 
 
 SHELDON & COMPANY, 
 
 NEW VORKl. 
 
ENGLI SH LITERA TURE. 
 
 SHAW'S NEW HISTORY OF ENGLISH AND AMERICAN LIT- 
 ERATURE 
 
 404 Pages. 
 Prepared on the basis of Shaw's " Manual of English Literature," by Trumam 
 J. Backus, of Vassar College,/^/ /itrr/e, c/erir type, and especially airanKed 
 for teaching this subject in Academies and High Schools, with copious references 
 to "The Choice Specimens of English and American Literature." It contains a 
 map of Britain at the close of the sixth century, showing the distribution of its 
 Celtic and Teutonic population ; also diagrams intended to aid the student in 
 remembering important classifications of authors. 
 
 CHOICE SPECIMENS OF AMERICAN LITERATURE AND 
 LITERARY READER. 
 
 518 Pages. 
 Selected from the works of American authors throughout the country, and 
 designed as a text-book, as well as Literary Reader iu advanced schools. By 
 Benj. N. Martin, D. D., L. H. D. 
 
 DR. FRANCIS WAYLAND'S 
 
 INTELLECTUAL PHILOSOPHY (Elements of). 
 
 426 Pages. 
 By Francis Wayland, late President of Brown University. 
 This work is a standard text-boolTin Colleges and High Schools. 
 
 THE ELEMENTS OF MORAL SCIENCE. 
 
 By Francis Wayland, D. D., President of Brown University, and Professor of 
 Moral Philosophy, 
 Fiftieth Thousand. 12mo, eloth, 
 
 *** This work has been highly commended by Reviewers, Teachers, and 
 others, and has been adopted as a class-book in most of the collegiate, theologi- 
 cal, and academical institutions of tlie country, 
 
 ELEMENTS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. 
 
 By Francis Wayland, D. D., President of Brown University. 
 
 Twenty-sixth Thousand. 12mo, eloth, 
 
 •>#* This important wo k of Dr. Wavland's is fast taking the place of every 
 Dther text-book on the subject of Political Economy in our colleges and higher 
 schools in all parts of the country. 
 
 We publish Abridged Editions of both the .Ifoi-ftl .Srie»ce and 'Polilicci. 
 £coHonty , for the use of Schools and Academies. 
 
 SHELDON & COMPANY. 
 
 NEW YO'RK. 
 
DR. JOSEPH HAVEN'S 
 
 VALUABLE TEXT-BOOKS. 
 
 Dr. Haven's text-books are the outgrowth of his long experience 
 as a teacher. Prof. Park, of Andover, says of his Mental Philos, 
 OPHY : " It is distinguished for its clearness ©f style, perspicuity of 
 method, candor of spirit, accuracy and comprehensiveness of 
 thought." 
 
 MENTAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 1 vol. 12mo. $2.00. 
 INCLUDING THE INTELLECT, THE SENSiS'LITIES, AND THE WILL 
 
 It is believed this work will be found pre-eminently distinguished for the com* 
 ^leteness with which it presents the whole subject 
 
 MORAL PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 INCLUDING THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ETHICS. 
 Royal 12mo, cloth, embossed. $1.75. 
 
 HISTORY OF ANCIENT AND MODERN PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 Price $2.00. 
 
 Dr. Haven was a very able man and a very clear thinker. He was for many 
 years x professor m Amherst. College, and also in Chicago University. He pos- 
 sessed the happy faculty of stating the most abstract iruth in an attractive and 
 interesting form. His work en "Intellectual Philosophy" has probably had 
 and is having to-day a larger sale than any similar te.\i-book ever published m 
 this country. 
 From GEORGE WOODS, LL. D., President Western University of Pennsylvania. 
 
 Ge.nti.emen. Dr. Haven's History of .Ancient and .Modern Phi'osophy /rti/>- 
 plieg a r/rertf nrnit. It g ves such information on the subject as many stu- 
 dents and men, who have not time fully to e.xamine a complete history, need. 
 The material is selected with good judgment, and the work is written in the au- 
 thor's attractive style. I shall recommend its use in this department of study. 
 
 From HOWARD CROSBY, D. D., LL. D., Chancellor of University of New York. 
 
 Messrs. Sheldon & Co. have )ust issued a very comprehensive and yet brief 
 survey of the History of Philosophic Thought, prepared by the late Dr. Joseph 
 Haven. It is well fitted for a college text-book. 
 
 Its divisions are logical, its sketch of each form of philosophy clear and dis- 
 criminating, and its style as readable as so condensed a work an be. I Aiiotf 
 0/ no compenriiitm Hhirfi ftires the birfPii-eye rien- of the history of 
 philosophy as i/iorouf/hlv as this hand-book of7)r. Haven. 
 
 SHELDON & COMPANY, 
 
 NEW VORK. 
 
TEXT-BOOK S CN GO VERNMENT, ■ 
 
 ALDER'S CITIZEN'S MAXVAL. 
 
 133 Pages. 
 A Text-Book on Civil Government^ in connection -with America?i Institutions. 
 By Joseph Alden, D. D., LL. D., President of the State Normal School, Al- 
 bany, N. Y. 
 
 This book was prepared for the purpose of presenting the subjects of which it 
 treats in a manner adapted to their study in Commcn Schools. It has bec« 
 extensively adopted, and is widely used, with moP* gratifying results. It is intro 
 ductory to this autiior's larger book. 
 
 TIZI^ SCIBJVCE OF GOTF'RJVMBJVTy 
 
 In connaction with American Institutions. 295 cages. 
 
 By Dr. Aldem. Intended as a text-book on the Constitution of the United 
 
 States for Hi2;h Schools and Colleges. Tliis book contains in a compact form 
 
 the facts and principles which every American citizen ought to know. It may be 
 
 made tUe basis of a briet or of an extended course of Instruction, as circumstances 
 
 Sr^ELLEX^S. 
 
 PATTERSON'S COMMON SCHOOL SPELLER. 
 160 Pages. 
 By Calvin Patterson, Principal Grammar School No. 13, Brooklyn, N. Y. 
 This book is divided into seven parts, and thoroughly graded. 
 
 PATTERSON'S SPELLER AND ANALYZER. 
 176 Pages. 
 Designed for the use of higher classes in schools and academies. 
 This Speller contains a carefully selected list of over 6,000 words, which em- 
 brace all such as a graduate of an advanced class 'hould know how to spell. 
 Words selJo n if ever used have bee 1 carefully excluded. The book teaches as 
 much of the dsrivation and formation of words as can be learned in the time al- 
 lotted to Spelling. 
 
 PATTERSON'S BLANK EXERCISE BOOK. 
 
 For Written Spelling. Small size. Bound in stiflF paper covers. 
 40 Pages. 
 
 PATTERSON'S BLANK EXERCISE BOOK. 
 
 For Written Spelling. Large size. Bound in board covers. 
 72 Pagres. 
 
 Each of these Exercise Books is ruled, numbered, and otherwise arranged to 
 correspond with the Spellers. Each book contains directions by which written 
 exercises in Spelling 7nay be reduced to a system. 
 
 Th^re is also an Appendix, for Correeted Words, which is in a convenient form 
 for reviews. 
 
 Hv the me of Ifie-ie 7>>frnK- Exern'xe 7ionA-f a class jf four hundred 7nay, 
 in thirty jninutes, spell /i/ty words each, making a total 0/ 20.000 words, and 
 carefully criticise and cornet the lesson ; each student thereby receiving tht 
 benefit c/ spelling the entire lesson and correcting mistakt-s. 
 
OLNEY'S SERIES OF ARITHMETICS. 
 
 A hiH Common School Course in Two Books. 
 
 OLNEY'S PRIMARY ARITHMETIC, - 
 
 OLNEY'S ELEMENTS OF ARITHMETIC, 
 
 A few of the characteristic features of the Primary Arithme- 
 tic are : 
 
 /. :4riaplnbilify to use in our Prim-.n- Schools— furnishing models of exer 
 cises on every topic, suited to class exo-cises and to pupils' work in their seats. 
 
 2. It is based upon a f/iornt'ffh ana/jsis of the child-micd and of the ele- 
 ments of the Science of Numbers. 
 
 .y. •SimplicHj of plan and nfitiirnlness of treatment 
 
 ^. fie'^orrnizes the rlixfhirfioii helween leuruhiff hoif to obtain a result 
 and committing that result to memory. 
 
 5. li fuli of practical expedieuls, helpful both to teacher and pupil. 
 
 6. Embodies the spirit of the Kinrtertjavteti met hurls, 
 
 7. Is beautifully illustrated by pictures which are object lessons, and 
 not mere ornaments.' 
 
 The Elements of Arithmetic. 
 
 tthis is a practical treatise on ^rithmetir, furnishing in one book of 308 
 pages a., the arithmetic compatible with a well-balanced common-school course, 
 or necessary to a good general English education. 
 
 The professes usually styled Jfeiitnl :Arithmetic n?-e here assimi- 
 lated and made the tjasts of the more formal and mechanical methods 
 called M'rilten Arithmetic. 
 
 Therefore, by the use of this book, from one-third to one-half the time 
 usually devoted to >\rithmetic in our Intermediate, Grammar, an4 
 Common 6'chools can be saved, and better results secured. 
 
 These books will both be found entirely fresh and original in p/nn, and 
 in mechanical execution altettd of any offered to the public. No expense has 
 been spared to give to Professor OIney's -Series of .Mathematics a dress 
 worthy of their original and valuable features. 
 
 A Teacher's 
 
 HAND-BOOK OF ARITHMETICAL EXERCISES, 
 
 to accompany the ELEMENTS OF ARITHMETIC, is now ready. This book 
 furnishes an ejrhaustless mine from which the teacher can draw for exercise 
 both mental and written in class-room drill, and for extending the range ot topics 
 when this is practicable. 
 
 THE SCIENCE OF ARITHMETIC, 
 
 The advanced book of the Series, is a full and complete course for High 
 Schools, and oa an entirely original plan. 
 
 SHELDON & COMPANY, 
 
 NEW YOHK. 
 
OLNEY'S HIGHER MATHEMATICS. 
 
 There is one feature which characterizes this series, so unique and yet so emi- 
 nently practical, that we leel desirous of calling special attention to it. It is t/ie 
 fiicUi/j' nith which the OooAs can Oe used for Clusxes of ati Grades, 
 and in Schools of the n-idest diversily of purpose. Each volume in the. 
 series is so constructed that it may be used with equal ease by the younpest anc^ 
 Icr-st disciplined, and by tiiose who in more mature years enter upon the studyl 
 with more ample preparation. This will be seen most clearly by a leference lo 
 the separate volumes. 
 
 Tiitvodaction to Algebra 
 
 Ctnnplete School Algebra 
 
 University Algebra 
 
 Test Examiiles in Algebra 
 
 Elements of Geometry. Separate 
 
 Elements of Trigonometry. Separate 
 
 Introduction to Geometry. Parti. Separate 
 
 Geometry and Trigonon^etry. School Edition 
 
 Geometry and Trigonometry, without Tables of 
 
 Logarithms. University Edition 
 
 Geometry and Trigonometry, with Tables. Uni- 
 
 versity Edition 
 
 Tables of Logaritlnns. Flexible covers 
 
 Geometry. University Edition. Parts I, II, and III... 
 
 General Geometry and Caletdiis 
 
 JJellows's Trigonometry 
 
 There is scarcely a College or Normal School in the 
 United States that is not now using some of Prof. Olney's 
 Mathematical works. 
 
 They are original and fresh— attractive to both Teacher 
 and Scholar. 
 
 Prof. Olney has a very versatile mind, and has suc- 
 ceeded to a wonderful degree in removing the difficulties 
 in the science of Mathematics, and even making this study 
 attractive to the most ordinary scholar. At the same time 
 Jiis books are thorough and comprehensive. 
 
 NEW YORK: 
 
 SHELDON & COMPANY, 
 
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 BERKELEY 
 
 Retiim to desk from which borrowed. 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 
 
 rjUN 2 9 1953 
 
 AUG 2 5 1954 LU 
 
 %r'£OPi^ 
 
 Loam oept 
 
 jm 4 1968 69, 
 
 L!> 
 
 REC'D 
 
 ||AY29l9ftO JUN2n969 00 
 
 
 JUTS BBi^lRCD 
 
 LD 21-100m-7,*52(A2528sl6)476 
 
 FNl 
 
 fee 10 197138