U m ./i r REESE LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. J UN 14 1893 . , 8t) . HEE MAJESTY'S MAILS, LONDON t CLAY, SON, AND TAYLOR, PRINTERS, BREAD STREET HILL. HER MAJESTY'S MAILS: HISTOEY OF THE POST-OFFICE, AND AN INDUSTRIAL ACCOUNT OF ITS PRESENT CONDITION. BY WJLLIAM LEWINS, OF THE GENEKAL POST-OFFICE. SECOND EDITION, REVISED, CORRECTED, AND ENLARGED. LONDON : SAMPSON LOW, SON, AND MAESTON, MILTON HOUSE, LUDGATE HILL. 1865. [The Right of Translation is reserved.} TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE HENRY, LOED BKOUGHAM AND VAUX ETC. ETC. ETC. WHO DURING AN UNUSUALLY LONG AND LABORIOUS LIFE HAS EVER BEEN THE EARNEST ELOQUENT AND SUCCESSFUL ADVOCATE OF ALL KINDS OF SOCIAL PROGRESS AND INTELLECTUAL ADVANCEMENT AND WHO FROM THE FIRST GAVE HIS MOST STRENUOUS AND INVALUABLE ASSISTANCE IN PARLIAMENT TOWARDS CARRYING THE MEASURE OF PENNY POSTAGE REFORM IS BY PERMISSION DEDICATED WITH FEELINGS OF DEEP ADMIRATION RESPECT AND GRATITUDE BY THE AUTHOR PBEFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. THE general interest taken in this work on its first appearance, and the favourable reception accorded to it, has abundantly- proved that many agreed with me in thinking that, in spite of the world of books issuing from the press, there were still great gaps in the "literature of social history," and that to some extent my present venture was calculated to fill one of them. That my critics have been most indulgent I have had more and more reason to know as I have gone on with the revision of the book. To make it less unworthy of the kind treatment it received, I have taken this opportunity to re-write the principal part of it, and to go over with extreme care and fidelity the remaining portion. In addition to the ordinary sources of information, of which I have made diligent and conscientious use, I have been privileged to peruse the old records of the Post-office, still carefully kept at St. Martin's-le-Grand. To any one knowing the nature of these records, it is almost unneces- sary to say that no materials could possibly be more useful in correcting and elucidating if not even in enlivening the present volume. I would, therefore, take this opportunity of presenting my cordial thanks to the Secretary of the Post-office, who, through the kind intervention of F. I. Scudamore, Esq. allowed me to see these records, and gave me facilities for their perusal. In addition, however, I have received much valuable assistance from many gentlemen more or less connected with the Post-office, all of whom have, with a heartiness and readiness which I could not have credited had I not experienced it, answered every inquiry which I found it necessary or desirable to make. Much of this service is adverted to, and, I hope, viii Preface to the Second Edition. properly acknowledged in different parts of the body of this work, but my special acknowledgments are due, and are hereby offered, to Sir Eowland Hill, who, when in a state of health which must have rendered this service irksome, most kindly pointed out to me several inaccuracies into which I had fallen, and directed me to many sources of information which had been heretofore either unknown to me or unavailable; to Edward J. Page, Esq. my immediate official superior, whose assistance and kindness in many ways deserve my heartiest thanks; to OrnAmd Hill, Esq. the Assistant-Controller of the Stamp-office, Somerset House, whose special services I have mentioned in the chapter on Postage-stamps ; to Mr. J. Powell Williams, of the General Post-office, who has supplied me with much useful and interesting information ; and to many other gentlemen connected with the General Post-offices of London and Edin- burgh, who, though they may have done less than those named above, have assisted me with great promptness and willingness. It is most necessary that I should add, in view of the fact of so many official gentlemen having, in their private capacity, looked upon my effort with favour, that I am alone responsible for the correctness of the subject-matter of this book, and for every expression of opinion into which I may have been led. Nor is the work now, any more than in its first form, in any sense an authorized publication. Nor has any suggestion, even the most remote, ever been made to me by those in authority either to omit, alter, modify, or insert a word which I have written. On the contrary, I have been most completely un- fettered and unrestrained in everything I have said. I offer this disclaimer not to those who know anything of the Post- office service ; to these readers such an assurance will of course be unnecessary and seem manifestly absurd ; but to those of my critics who, otherwise kind, have erroneously concluded that I have been compelled to view my subject through a strictly official medium, and supposed that the writing of this book, which has been the delight of my leisure hours, has formed a portion of my official duty. W. L. May 2d, 1865. PBEFACE TO THE FIEST EDITION. THIS volume is the first of a contemplated series designed to furnish some account of the history and ordinary working of the three revenue departments of the country to do for the great Governmental industries what Mr. Smiles has so ably done (to compare his great things with our small) for the pro- fession of civil engineering and several national industries. Few attempts have ever been made to trace the rise and progress of the invaluable institution of the Post-office. We have more than once seen the question asked in Notes and Queries that sine qua non of the curious and the learned where a continuous account might be found of English postal history. In each case, the inquirer has been referred to a short summary of the history of the Post-office, prefixed to the Postmaster-General's First Eeport. Subsequently, Mr. Edward Edwards, in the eighth edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, has supplied an ex- cellent and more extended notice. Still more recently, however, in an admirable paper on the Post-office in Fraser's Magazine, Mr. Matthew D. Hill has expressed his astonishment that so little study has been given to the subject that it " has attracted the attention of so small a number of students, and of each, as it would appear, for so short a time." " I have not been able to find," adds Mr. Hill, " that even Germany has produced a single work which affects to furnish more than a sketch or outline of postal history." The first part of the following pages is offered as a contribution to the study of the subject, in the hope that it will be allowed to fill the vacant place, at any rate, until the x Preface to the First Edition. work is done more worthily. With regard to that most inter- esting episode in the history of the Post-office which resulted in the penny-post reform, the materials for our work scanty though they undoubtedly are in the earlier periods are here sufficiently abundant, and have engaged our special attention. The greater portion of the second division of this volume, as well as a small portion of the first part, appeared originally in the pages of several popular serial publications principally Chambers^ Journal and Mr. Chambers's Book of Days ; the whole, however, has been thoroughly revised, where it has not been re- written, and otherwise adapted to the purposes of the present work. We are indebted to Mr. Eobert Chambers, LL.D. not only for permitting the republication of these papers in this form, but also for kindly indicating to us sources of information from the rich storehouse of his experience, which we have found very useful. On collateral subjects, such as roads and convey- ances, besides having, in common with other readers, the benefit of Mr. Smiles's valuable researches in his Lives of the Engineers, we are personally indebted to him for kindly advice. We have only to add that, while in no sense an authorized publication, personal acquaintance has been brought to bear on the treatment of different parts of it, and that we have received, in describing the various branches of the Post-office, much valuable informa- tion and assistance from Mr. J. Bowker, of the Eailway Post- office, and several gentlemen connected with the London Establishment. It is hoped that the information, now for the first time brought together, may prove interesting to many letter-writers who are ignorant, though not willingly so, of the channels through which their correspondence flows. If our readers think that the Wise Man was right when he likened the receipt of pleasant intelligence from a far country to cold water given to a thirsty soul, surely they will also admit that the agency employed to compass this good service, which has made its influence felt in every social circle, and which has brought manifold blessings in its train, deserves some passing thought and attention. April 16^,1864. CONTENTS. PAET I. THE HISTORY OF THE BRITISH POST-OFFICE. INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. PAGE ON EARLY POSTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3 CHAPTER II. OUR POST COMMUNICATIONS PRIOR TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE POST-OFFICE 16 CHAPTER III. THE RISE OF THE GENERAL POST-OFFICE 32 CHAPTER IV. THE POST-OFFICES OF ENGLAND AND THE SISTER COUNTRIES UP TO END OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY .... 54 CHAPTER Y. ON OLD ROADS AND SLOW COACHES 71 CHAPTER VI. THE SETTLEMENT OF THE POST-OFFICE 82 CHAPTER VII. RALPH ALLEN AND CROSS POSTS IN ENGLAND, AND JAMES ANDERSON AND HORSE POSTS IN SCOTLAND. 1715 TO 1760 103 CHAPTER VIII. PALMER AND THE MAIL-COACH ERA , 123 xii , Contents. CHAPTER IX. PAGE THE TRANSITION PERIOD AT THE POST-OFFICE 152 CHAPTER X. SIR ROWLAND HILL AND PENNY POSTAGE 168 CHAPTER XI. EARLY RESULTS OF THE PENNY-POSTAGE SCHEME . . . . 197 CHAPTER XII. THE LETTER-OPENING COMMITTEE OF 1844, AND THE COM- MISSION ON SUNDAY LABOUR AT THE POST-OFFICE IN 1849 . 214 CHAPTER XIII. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POST-OFFICE 231 PART II. INDUSTRIAL ACCOUNT OF THE POST-OFFICE. PREFATORY 251 CHAPTER I. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE POST-OFFICE 252 CHAPTER II. ON THE CIRCULATION OF LETTERS 263 CHAPTER III. ON POSTAGE-STAMPS 302 CHAPTER IV. POST-OFFICE SAVINGS' BANKS, AND GOVERNMENT INSURANCES AND ANNUITIES 316 CONCLUSION 329 INDEX 335 PAET I. THE HISTORY OF THE BRITISH POST OFFICE. " THE history of the POST OFFICE is a history of national and interna- tional benefactions." J5Wy. Brit. " The POST OFFICE giveth wings to the extension of commerce." PENNANT. " Of all inventions, the alphabet and the printing-press alone excepted, those inventions which abridge distance have done most for the civilization of our species. . . . Every improvement of the means of locomotion benefits mankind, morally and intellectually, as well as materially." LORD MACATJLAY. HER MAJESTY'S MAILS INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. ON EARLY POSTAL COMMUNICATIONS. IT is very remarkable that the first letter of which we have any record should have afforded a conclusive proof of one of the two heinous sins of its writer " the sweet singer of Israel ;" and not only so, but that the messenger employed to convey this par- ticular letter should have carried his own death-warrant. When Uriah the Hittite stood in the way of the gratification of David's unlawful lust, the king " wrote a letter to Joab, and sent it by the hands of Uriah," telling the commander of his hosts to put the bearer of the letter " in the forefront of the hottest battle, and retire ye from him, that he may be smitten and die." It is further noteworthy that this letter, from the peculiar character of its contents, must have been a sealed or otherwise secured communication. Circular letters, and a kind of post for conveying them, are frequently mentioned both in sacred and profane history. Queen Jezebel wrote the first circular letters of which we have any account ; and it is not surprising to find that she issued them for purposes of deception. According to the sacred chronicler, she " wrote letters in Ahab's name, and sealed them with his seal, and sent the letters unto the elders and to the B2 4 Her Majesty's Mails. nobles in the city." Still later, or about 900 B.C. Naanian, captain of the host of the King of Syria, was the bearer of a letter from his master to the King of Israel ; and though in every way a peaceful enough letter, the latter would seem to have regarded it as a portent of war (2 Kings v. 6, 7). In the days of Hezekiah, or 700 B.C. there must have been some organization for the carrying of the government letters, for we read in the Chronicles of the Kings that " the posts went with the letters from the king and his princes throughout all Israel ;" while in the Book of Esther we learn that Ahasuerus, King of Persia, being displeased at the disobedience of his wife Vashti, sent letters into every province of his vast empire, informing his subjects that it was his imperial will that "every man should bear rule in his own house." Though it is not clear by what means Ahasuerus sent those letters-missive into every province of his empire, " according to the writing thereof, and to every people according to their language," yet there can be no doubt that we are indebted to the Persians for the first idea of posts. Diodorus Siculus describes a kind of station built at short distances, in Persia, before the time of Cyrus, in which were placed messengers who were employed solely in giving " notices of public occurrences from one to another with a very loud and shrill voice ; by which means news was transmitted to court with great expedition." No secresy could be observed, however, in this arrangement. Secret intelligence must have been transmitted in some other way. We have, in fact, many accounts of the curious expedients resorted to by the ancients when private and confidential messages required to be forwarded from one place to another. Herodotus tells us that one of the most curious was to shave the head of a trusty messenger, and then to impress the secret intelligence upon the skull. " When the hair had grown sufficiently long for concealment, the messenger proceeded to his destination," where, according to this barbarous arrangement, his head was again shaved, and the object of the secret mission thus revealed. Ovid tells of messages being inscribed upon a person's back. The Jewish historian, Josephus, relates that during some wars messages were conveyed by men disguised as animals ; also that letters were frequently sent enclosed in coffins, in company with Persian Posts. 5 an embalmed body. Appian mentions letters inscribed on leaden bullets, and thrown by a sling into a besieged city or camp. Julius Csesar, when he wished to write secretly, arranged a kind of cypher writing not very dissimilar to that of more modern days. Suetonius and Diodorus Siculus both explain that he made use of the fourth letter after that which he ought to have used ; as d for a, e for 6, &c. According to the same authorities, Augustus used the letter immediately following, as 6 for a, aa for z, &c. Cyrus was the first to organize a regular riding post, to remedy the great inconvenience felt from the system then in existence in Persia. With this view, he " caused it to be tried how far a horse could go in a day without baiting, and, at that distance, appointed stages and men whose business it was to have horses always in readiness." 1 It is further added that the stations or towers between these longer distances were taken down, as having been superseded. Another authority 2 tells us that there were one hundred and eleven postal stages, a day's journey distant from each other, between Susa and the ^Egean Sea, and that at each stage a large and beautiful structure was erected, and every convenience for the purpose designed. The speed of the couriers on the main line of road from Susa to Sardis, which Herodotus says "nothing mortal surpassed," appears to have been from sixty to one hundred and twenty miles a day. " Nothing in the world," he adds, " is borne so swiftly as messages by the Persian couriers." One of his commentators, however, excepts the carrier pigeon from this statement, and very properly so. It is certainly remarkable that neither in this nor in any other recorded instance have the posts in ancient times developed into one for the conveyance of private correspondence. It is certain that the Greeks and Romans, even when at the height of their civilization, had no regular public post. Among the Greeks, private correspondence was exceedingly rare, and can scarcely be said to have existed before 600 B.C. Whether writing at all was known in the Homeric times is uncertain. 3 (Grote, voL ii. 1 Xeiiophon, viii. p. 496, edit. Hutchinson. 2 Herodotus, viii. 98. 3 The epistle carried by Bellerophon, as described by Homer in the sixth book of the Iliad, kiudly pointed put to us by oue of the greatest of our Homeric scholars, would seein to indicate with its "sealed tablets," s< 6 Her Majesty's Mails. p. 192.) We know that subsequently the despatches relating to the affairs of state were forwarded by special messengers or runners, some of whom were celebrated for their speed and powers of endurance. It is related that one of these, Phidip- pides, ran from Athens to Sparta or 150 English miles in two days. But this correspondence was carried on by a very select few. Mr. Grote holds that the Spartans, at any rate, were almost entirely ignorant of written communication. He quotes l from Isocrates, who tells us that the most rational Spartans " will appreciate a discourse, if they find any one to read it to them." Col. Mure, 2 another eminent authority, argues that writing was familiar in the time of Archilochus, both at Sparta and elsewhere in Greece ; and quotes from this poet where knowledge of written communications. The reader of the following extract can scarcely fail to be reminded of the first sentence of the present chapter, in which we speak of the first letter on record : " Bellerophon, Who o'er the sons of men in beauty shined, Loved for that valour which preserves mankind. Then mighty Preetns Argos' sceptre sway'd, Whose hard commands Bellerophon obey'd. With direful jealousy the monarch raged, And the brave prince in numerous toils engaged. Tor him Antsea burn'd with lawless flame, And strove to tempt him from the path of fame : In vain she tempted the relentless youth Endued with wisdom, sacred fear, and truth. Fired at his scorn the queen to Prsetus fled, And begged revenge for her insulted bed : Incensed he heard, resolving on his fate ; But hospitable laws restrained his hate : To Lycia the devoted youth he sent With tablets sealed, that told his dire intent. Now blessed by every power who guards the good, The chief arrived at Xanthus' silver flood : There Lycia's monarch paid him honours due, Nine days he feasted, and nine bulls he slew, But when the tenth bright morning orient glow'd The faithful youth his monarch's mandate show'd, The fatal tablets, till that instant seal'd, The deathful secret to the king revealed." Bellerophon must now fight for dear life. He slaughters the " chimaera dire " " a mingled monster of no human kind ;" then the Solymsean crew, "fiercest of men;" then the whole force of the Amazons is defied and conquered. After successfully resisting a treacherous ambush of his " Lycian foes," he is confessed " a god-descended chief," and remains in Lycia, the king giving him his daughter in marriage, " with half the honours of his ample reign." Pope's Homer, vol. i. pp. 217, 218. i Grote's History of Greece^ vol. ii. p. 526. 2 Vol. in. p. 45,3. Roman Couriers. 7. he likens himself or his ode to a scytaU containing unwelcome intelligence. The word "scytale" is explained by Col. Mure as having reference to the practice of writing upon a long narrow strip of parchment, rolled up in a spiral form round a staff, one fold close upon another ; which practice was employed, he says, by the Spartan government for sending despatches to their general on foreign service, who had a staff of precisely similar dimensions, and on receiving the parchment rolled it round his own staff for the purpose of reading it. It must be understood here, for Col. Mure's account is not clear, that the words were written on the strip along the staff, and were quite unintelligible when the strip was unwrapped and not rolled round the counter- part staff. The general, by these means, could alone decipher the message. Mr. Grote, on the contrary, thinks that this staff answered no other purpose than to ensure the herald respect or his own inviolability of person in the performance of his duty. The heralds employed by government, he suggests, were "messengers, not postmen," and their office was to deliver messages, not letters ; the Homeric Talthybius and Idseus, with their successors in office, are " the messengers of Zeus and of men." It is true that the herald might carry parchments ; but this, thinks Mr. Grote, was neither his primitive nor his ordinary function. " Idseus was a minister of the voice and the ear." It is at least curious that the ancient Eomans, who seem to have been well acquainted with the art of letter- writing, should have been behind the Greeks, who knew little of it, in the establishment of posts and couriers. We find from Suetonius 1 and Plutarch that it was to the Emperor Augustus that Eome owed the introduction of public couriers. Before his time great attention had been paid to the construction of roads ; some of their great highways which remain to the present day attest their skill and labour in this direction. Pliny informs us, that so important was the question of good roads, that " the charge of the public ways was intrusted only to men of the highest dignity." One of the emperors himself undertook the charge of the roads immediately round Eome, and appointed two men of Praetorian rank to pave them. 2 Along the roads were inns or 1 Suet. Auff. 49. 2 Adam's Roman Antiquities, edit. Major, p. 511. 1835. 8 Her Majesty's Mails. stages called Mansiones ; commonly at the distance of half a day's journey. Augustus appointed posts on these principal trunk roads, arranging also places for relays of horses, which were called Mutationes. 1 At the latter stages horses were kept, in constant readiness, at the public expense. Pliny 2 distinctly informs us that these posts were employed only to forward the public despatches, or convey political intelligence from or to the government at Kome. Although, however, there was this prohi- bition against civilians using the government post, there was none against employing private messengers upon the public roads, and many of the wealthier citizens of the republic and the empire had their regular messengers. Both public and private couriers were designated tabellarii, 3 from tabella, a letter. We can well understand how some extraordinary occasion might arise for the speedy transmission of an important private com- munication to some great distance an occasion to which the private couriers would scarcely be equal, as they only travelled short journeys without any relay. Hence the dissatisfaction which is said to have arisen in respect to the exclusiveness of the government arrangement. Then arose the granting of the diploma, which was issued by the emperor or any Roman magistrate, and by means of which, according to Pliny, any person might command the use of the public horses or carriages, or the services of the public couriers. 4 That the official couriers travelled with wonderful expedition, which far excelled anything of the kind in modern times, scarcely admits of question. Blair, 5 quoting from Quintilian, tells us that Cicero received a letter in Rome on the 28th of September, dated in Britain the first of the same month. " It had been forwarded either through civil letter-carriers, or through a military channel ; and consider- ing the passage by sea, and the crossing of the Alps, or a troublesome circuit to avoid the latter, the twenty-six days of 1 Adams, Roman Antiquities, edit. Major, p. 512. 2 Pliny, Ex. x. p. 120; see also Bergier, and Gibbon's Decline and Fall, chap. xvii. 3 Dr. Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. 4 We have seen it suggested in a respectable journal, with great show of reason, that this diploma, which would doubtless have to pass with the letter from the hands of one courier to another throughout the different stages, is a complete prototype of our postage stamps. 5 Blair's Inquiry into the State of Slavery among the Romans. Mexico and Peru. 9 actual travelling seem wonderfully few" (p. 261). Gibbon 1 relates an instance of early post-travelling, which almost tran- scends the brightest achievements of our English service even in the palmiest days of mail-coaches. Csesarius, a magistrate of rank, in the time of Theodosius went post from Antioch to Constantinople. He began his journey at night ; was in Cappadocia, 165 miles from Antioch, the ensuing evening, and arrived at Constantinople the sixth day about noon, the whole distance being 725 Roman, or 665 English, miles. With such instances before us, and also with the fact that ancient Eome was very familiar with the art of letter writing as indeed it seems to have been with nearly all the accessories to comfort in their social and domestic existence, it is only the more marvel- lous that this great nation, to whom, as well as to others, we are so greatly indebted for much that exalts the intellect and adonis life, should not have left us an example of such a useful institu- tion as a public letter-post. In neglecting the establishment of this institution, however, they neglected an indispensable requi- site to social and commercial life and prosperity. The progress of civilization, as it has often been pointed out, has always been intimately and essentially connected with, and dependent upon, facilities for intercommunication keeping pace, in fact, with the means which nations have possessed for the interchange of persons and property, and with them of thought and knowledge. Historians who write, and people who talk, of civilization travelling westward, have need to be reminded of the progress which was made in the development of all useful arts, and of the possession of many of the richest germs of civilization by the ancient empires of Mexico and Peru. At any rate, their system of post communication will bear comparison with those of ancient Persia, not to speak of Greece or Eome. When the Spaniards on the strength of their vaunted civilization set them- selves to work to subdue these Western barbarians, as they called them, they were astonished to find how superior their travelling and postal arrangements were to any to which they had ever been accustomed. The new world in this respect was then far ahead of the old a fact which is wonderingly set down and frankly acknowledged by the older Spanish writers. 1 Decline and Fall, vol. i. chap. 2. io Her Majesty's Mails. " Communications in Mexico, from the earliest times of which any record can be had," says Prescott, 1 " was maintained with the remotest parts of the country by means of couriers, post houses being established for the purpose at two leagues distance from each other." The courier bearing his despatches in the form of a hieroglyphical painting, ran with them to the first station, where he was relieved by another messenger, and so on till the capital was reached. An old chronicler gives the speed at four or five leagues an hour ; 2 but it is more likely that another was more accurate when he gave the rate at 150 miles a day. By means of these couriers, fresh fish and other dainties are said to have been served at Montezuma's table from a distance of 150 miles. A curious and novel part of the arrangement of the couriers of the Aztecs was the character of their dress. The colour of the dress worn denoted respectively good or bad tidings, and as they were almost exclusively engaged in carrying intelli- gence of the movements of the royal army, or some equally important national news, " their appearance spread joy or con- sternation in the towns or districts through which they passed." The post system of the Incas was even superior to anything of the kind in Mexico. The remains of gigantic works of art attest their great mechanical and architectural skill. Humboldt 3 tells us that the roads of the Incas were among the most useful and 1 Prescott's Mexico, vol. i. pp. 34, 35. 2 Some interesting facts of the pedestrian capabilities of man in his savage state are collected by Buffon in his Natural History, who assures us that " civilized man knows little of strength or endurance." We need not, however, travel so far for authentic instances of great locomotive power in man. There are many curious accounts extant of the pedestrian powers of the running footmen of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Noble- men and country gentlemen, both in England and Scotland, kept running footmen np to so late as the middle of the last century. Hence, doubtless, the designation " footman." It is related on well authenticated grounds that the Earl of Home, early last century, gave his footman a commission towards the close of the day to proceed from Home Castle in Berwickshire to Edin- burgh, a distance of thirty-five miles, in order to deliver a letter of high poli- tical importance. Early next morning, when his lordship entered the hall, he saw the man sleeping on a bench, and " was proceeding to some rash act, thinking the man had neglected his duty," when the footman awoke, and gave the earl the answer to his letter. Lord Home, equally astonished and gratified, it is said, with the man's amazing powers of speed, rewarded him with a piece of ground, which bears the name to this day of the Post Riff, a term equiva- lent to the postman's field, and the villagers of Home point to the plot as an unquestionable proof of the truth of the story. 3 Vues des Cordilleres, p. 294. Great Speed of the Couriers. n stupendous works ever executed by man. Mr. Prescott 1 says that the traveller still meets, especially in central regions of the table land, with memorials of the past. " Among them, perhaps, the most remarkable are the great roads, the broken remains of which are still in sufficient preservation to attest their former magnificence." One of these stupendous works Mr. Prescott goes on to describe as having been " conducted over pathless sierras buried in snow ; galleries were cut for leagues through the living rock ; rivers were crossed by means of bridges that swung suspended in the air ; precipices were scaled by stairways hewn out of the native bed ; ravines of hideous depth were filled up with solid masonry ; in short, all the difficulties which beset a wild and mountainous region, and which might appal the most courageous engineer of modern times, were encountered and successfully overcome." The length of this particular road the historian estimates at from fifteen hundred to two thousand miles ; while the roadway seems to have been so nicely constructed that a carriage might travel upon it as securely as it could on the Appian Way or our own Watling Street. Along the entire route on the principal Peruvian roads, small buildings were erected for the convenience of the post-runners, or chasquis, who were stationed at these buildings to carry forward any despatch which might arrive. These despatches were either verbal, or conveyed by means of the quipus, an arrangement not very dissimilar to the hieroglyphical scrolls of the Mexicans. The quipa " was a cord composed of different coloured threads tightly twisted together, from which a quantity "of smaller threads were suspended in the manner of a fringe." The colours denoted different objects, white representing silver; yellow, gold ; or as representing abstract ideas, white signified peace and red war. The most important kind of despatches were accompanied by a thread of the crimson fringe which was worn round the temples of the Inca, which thread seems to have been regarded " with the same implicit deference," says Mr. Prescott, " as the signet ring of an Oriental despot." The chasquis were dressed in a peculiar livery, intimating their profession. They were well-trained to their employment, and invariably chosen for their speed and fidelity. The rate at which they ran over 1 History of the Conquest of Peru, vol. i. p. 5?. 1 2 Her Majesty's Mails. the ground is nowhere mentioned, so far as we can ascertain, but by a system of relays the despatches are said to have been carried at the rate of about 150 miles a day. Montesinos, a Spanish writer, says that, as in Mexico, the royal table was furnished with the choicest dainties by means of the couriers ; fish having been known to have been brought a distance of a hundred leagues in twenty-four hours after it was drawn from the ocean ! After reading of this marvellous expedition, and the gigantic works which were reared to ensure the high rate of speed, we may well share the wonder of the historian, who, speaking of the postal arrangements of the Mexicans and Peruvians got up, by the way, without any correspondence with each other cannot understand " how two barbarian nations of the new world " should have come to the knowledge of such a system " long before it was introduced among the civilized nations of Europe." It is almost sad to relate that the institu- tion of the Peruvian posts, which appears to have made a deep impression on the Spaniards when they first approached the country, were allowed to fall into complete abeyance during the rule of these so-called civilized conquerors. It only remains to turn our attention to ancient China before we come nearer home. Marco Polo, the famous Venetian, who travelled in China in the fourteenth century, describes the govern- ment post as having been long in existence, and similar to that in use in Persia under Cyrus. " Messengers are sent to divers provinces," says Polo, 1 "and on all the roads they find a post called jamb, at distances of thirty-five miles, for the entertainment of the imperial envoy." At .each jamb there was a large edifice, " containing a bed covered with silk, and everything useful and convenient for a traveller;" so that "if even a king should come," adds Polo, " he would be well accommodated." Four hundred horses were attached to each station ten thousand in number for the convenience of couriers and travellers. " This is the greatest establishment that ever was kept up by any king or emperor in the world ; for at these jambs there are maintained altogether more than 200,000 horses." This reads so much like romance, that, associating the fact with another, namely, that Polo's annotators are accustomed to tone down the statistics 1 Travels of Marco Polo, 1844 edit. pp. 139, 140. Early Chinese Posts. 13 of the quaint Venetian traveller, we may imagine a lesser num- ber, and still conclude that the " establishment " was a most gigantic undertaking. The Chinese posts appear to have been kept up principally in the less populated districts, and for the carrying of news over long distances. In other parts of the country, and in some cases in the intervals between the more aspiring post-stations, we find foot-runners also employed in carrying despatches. They used to wear a large girdle set round with bells, which were heard at a great distance. When one of these runners received a letter or packet, he would at once set off, and run to the next village, where, his approach being an- nounced by his bells, another would make himself ready for the next stage ; and thus, without a break, would the packet be conveyed, " the Khan receiving news in one day and night from places distant a ten days' journey." When the messengers rode with despatches of greater importance, and used the jambs, we find that they travelled day and night, accomplishing a distance of 250 or 300 miles in twenty-four hours. Polo's account of the way the business was accomplished seems to be quite trust- worthy, as subsequent travellers 1 have described the posts^ which excited their greatest admiration in much the same manner. The whole of these facts afford a curious commentary on the progress of civilization in the Celestial Empire : though this gigantic and elaborate establishment has been in existence from a very early period up to the present century, it is only within the last few years that provision has been made in China for public letter-posts ; and even this change was not inaugu- rated by the Government, but by private enterprise. The earliest date in modern European history at which any postal service is mentioned, is the year 807, when an organization was planned by the Emperor Charlemagne. Having reduced Italy, Germany, and a part of Spain to his rule, the Emperor of the Franks found it necessary to have some kind of communica- tion with his new dominions. Hence the institution of govern- ment couriers and posts which brought him news of occurrences happening at distant places with great expedition. The service, however, did not long survive him ; his successors lost the benefits of the posts even quicker than they sacrificed the immense i See Anderson's British Embassy (London, 1796), p. 282. 14 Her Majesty's Mails. territories which he added to his crown. We hear no more of posts in France till 1464, when, by an ordonnance of June 19th in that year, the restless and ambitious Louis XI. re-established them, in order that he " might be the easier advertised of all that passed in his own and neighbouring states." Louis XI. is said to have employed 230 couriers to deliver his letters and de- spatches. It was not till the seventeenth century that the posts thus originated became public posts. The first regular European letter-post was established in the republic of the Hanse Towns in the early part of the thirteenth century. These small republics, detached as they were from each other, yet all alike engaged in commercial pursuits, would of necessity require frequent intercommunication ; while, as one writer remarks, the merchants themselves being the rulers, nothing can be more natural, on the one hand, than that the government should allow the benefits of the new order of things to be shared by the entire community, or on the other hand that they should fail to observe the fiscal advantages derivable from letter postage. The example set by the thriving Hanse Towns was not followed in Germany proper till two centuries afterwards, when Maximilian I. caused a line of posts to be laid down in the Tyrol, connecting his newly-acquired Lombardian territories with Austria. Roger, the first count of the House of Thurn and Taxis, originally a member of one of the princely families of Lombardy, is credited with the merit of applying the institu- tion of the post to this locality. In 1516 the next count of the same House formed a line of post communication between Vienna and Brussels, thus further connecting the vast. dominions of the Spanish emperor. We next find that the successor of Maxi- milian, the famous Emperor Charles V. gave Leonhard, Count of Thurn and Taxis, a commission to establish one more line of posts between the Netherlands and Italy, going through Treves, Spires, &c. to Wurtemburg and the Tyrol, and on the successful carrying out of the scheme in 1543, creating the count Ober- postmeister of the German empire. For the next fifty years, after the death of Charles V. the posts which he had established fell into disuse, principally because they fell into debt and into the hands of enemies ; but they were again restored under the Emperor Rudolf II. Then disputes arose between the different Thurn and Taxis. 15 states of the empire, Saxony, the Palatinate, Wurtemburg, and other states electing to serve themselves with their own posts. To settle in some part these disputes, the Emperor Matthias, in 1616 (according to Horneck) created the Count of Taxis a baron of the empire, transferring at the same time " the imperial posts in fee upon himself and heirs," in virtue of which his descendants have always held peculiar rights and privileges. Austria, Prussia, Bavaria, Hanover, Baden, and the refractory states above alluded to have in late years either purchased exemption from the arrangement, or compulsorily freed themselves from it, but the family possesses to this day, as a fief of the empire, the postal system of Nassau, Saxe Weimar, Schwarzburg, Kudolstadt, &c. The posts of the free cities of Germany, also, in most part belong to the House, the head quarters of which have been, since 1811, at Frankfort-on-the-Maine. 1 6 Her Majesty's Mails. CHAPTEE II. OUR POST COMMUNICATIONS PRIOR TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE POST OFFICE. WE may gather from different historical notices and parlia- mentary papers something like a continuous account of the early history of the British Post Office, tracing its progress from the fifteenth century to the present time. We look in vain, how- ever, for the same distinctness in the details prior to that period, and can do little more than guess as to how our forefathers then got on in the matter of their correspondence. We have searched, in fact, through entire and laboured tomes of history, without coming across even the barest mention of such subjects. It is true that it is only within a comparatively recent period that the Post Office institution has risen to a position of great national importance. From this position it would now be impossible to exclude it in any subsequent national records : that kind of writing which should neglect to recite the means employed by nations to compass their advancement, step by step, would scarcely now be dignified with the name of history. It is because it has been vastly different in past times that we have now to lament over the meagreness of our information on this, and similar subjects. " History," says an able writer in the Encyclo- pedia Britannica, " more attentive to record the transactions of monarchs than the steps by which communities improve their conveniences, furnishes little beyond an incidental notice of the modes by which the circulation of correspondence was effected before it became matter of state regulation." Such subjects were probably cast aside as furnishing nothing but a mass of uninteresting detail. Distinguished annalists of our own day have thought differently, however, and the brilliant pages of Macaulay and Froude are even enlivened by the introduction of facts showing the gradual advance made in our social and The Anglo-Saxon Era. 1 7 domestic improvements. It is to such materials as we have, rendered scanty by the neglect of our earlier historians, that we must now turn. It is almost impossible to tell whether any organization existed in Britain under the Eomans for the delivery of despatches ; or even whether the system in vogue at Eome was ever brought to this country. Wherever the conquerors went they certainly made transmission between different parts of the country com- paratively easy and safe. The remains of the roads constructed by the Eomans bear witness to the pains which they took in this direction. But here our researches end. Of the Anglo- Saxon era the information left us is equally bare and scanty. Sharon Turner, Palgrave, and Kemble are all nearly silent on this subject. The Anglo-Saxon kings would seem to have done something to keep up the roads which the Eomans made with such skill ; and in the practice of travelling from place to place they seem to have done more than their descendants of several centuries afterwards. Not only in the towns, but on the high roads the people had their taverns, or guest-houses, as they were called. " The word inn" says Mr. Wright, 1 " is itself Saxon, and sig- nified a lodging." A traveller in Bede arrives at a hospitium in the north of England, " kept by a paterfamilias and his house- hold." The travellers, it ought to be said, were mostly wander- ing minstrels and " merchants " answering to our pedlars ; and they were always welcome, for they brought the only news ever received from distant places. It is more than likely that the hospitable laws of the period had something to do with the heartiness of their welcome. Mr. Wright tells us that when a stranger presented himself at a Saxon door and asked for board and lodging, the man who refused was looked upon with con- tempt by his countrymen. The venerable Bede describes as the first act of the "custom of hospitality," the washing of the stranger's hands and feet ; afterwards he would be allowed to remain two nights without being questioned. A refusal to give this accommodation was considered worthy of ecclesiastical cen- sure. Merchant travellers went in small parties for defence as well as companionship, and as the laws of hospitality did not 1 History of Domestic Manners and Sentiments in England during the Middle Ages, p. 75. 1 8 Her Majesty's Mails. relate so much to them, they carried their tents with them in much the same way as the pedlars and gipsies of our own day. Messengers employed to carry news and letters between the different kings of the Heptarchy walked at a swift rate with them. Little difference is recorded in this respect, and in other of the domestic manners of the nation under the Norman kings, if we except the change in travelling and the greater speed of the messengers brought about by a more extensive use of horses. While the general post dates from the time of the Stuarts, the establishment of a regular riding post in England owes its origin to Edward IV. As the establishment of this post in England is almost contemporaneous with that of the French king, Louis XL, it cannot be said that England, even at this period, was much behind her continental neighbours in the production of measures of social progress. The English post, moreover, seems from the first to have been fully commensurate with the demands for its service, its growth also depending on the gradual advance- ment made in the country. Five or six centuries ago few private persons could either read or write. On the other hand, the business of the State demanded correspondence. The king had his barons to summon, or his sheriffs to instruct, and letters of writ were issued accordingly a few Government messengers supplying all the wants of the time. Now and then the nobles would require to address each other, and sometimes to correspond with their dependents ; but, as a general rule, neither the serf nor his master had the power, even if they had the will, to engage much in writing. As time wore on, and we come nearer the age of the Tudors, the desire for learning spread, though still the fewVho engaged in literary or scientific pursuits were either attached to the court or to the monastic establishments, of which we had then a fair share. Even when the Tudor dynasty came in, trade with foreign countries and remote districts in our own country was to a great extent unknown. Each district dwelt alone, supplied its own wants, and evinced very little desire for any closer communication. Whilst we can thus account for the paucity of correspondence among the people, the different stages of progress which the transmission of the royal letters underwent in England testify to their increasing number, and must not go unnoticed. Haste, Post Haste / 1 9 In the earliest times in England, and prior to the first regular horse-posts, both public and private letters were sent by private messengers, travelling when required. In the reign of Henry I. messengers were first permanently employed by the king. So early as the reign of King John the payments to nuncii as these messengers were now called for the conveyance of Government despatches, are to be found entered in the Close and Misce Rolls, " and the entries of these payments," says one writer, l " may be traced in an almost unbroken series through the records of many subsequent reigns." Nuncii were also attached to the establishments of the principal nobles of the time, and communications passed between them by means of these func- tionaries. In the reign of Henry III. the son and successor of King John, these messengers began to wear the royal livery. At first it was necessary for them to keep horses of their own, or use those belonging to the royal or baronial mansion. In the reign of Edward I. we find that fixed stations or posts were established, at which places horses were kept for hire ; the nuncii ceasing to provide horses of their own, or to borrow from private individuals. Several letters are in existence dating as far back as the reign of Edward II. which bear the appearance of having been carried by the nuncii of that period, with " Haste, post haste ! " written on the backs of them. We may notice here, in passing, that afterwards such words were not understood as of idle intent, but were regarded as indications of the importance of the communication, some of the superscriptions being as energetic as words could make them. Thus, in the reign of Edward VI. we find the Lord Protector (Somerset) writing to Lord Dacre in Cumberland anent the Border troubles, which were becoming serious again, and concerning which delay could not be suffered. Somerset's letter to Dacre is thus endorsed, " To our very good lord, the Lord Dacre, Warden of the West Marches, in haste ; haste, post haste, for thy life, for thy life, for thy life." Lord Dacre's reply to the Duke of Somerset is endorsed, " To my Lord Protector's Grace, in haste ; haste, post haste, for thy life, for thy life, haste, haste." 2 Both 1 Ency. Brit. 8th edit. 2 Nicholson and Burns, History and Antiquities of Cumberland and West- moreland, vol. i. p. 62. c2 2o Her Majesty's Mails. these letters seem to have taken five days for the journey between London and Carlisle. With the machinery, to a great extent, ready to his hand, the improvements contrived by Edward IV. were easily accomplished. In 1481, this monarch was engaged in war with Scotland, when, according to Gale, in order to facilitate the transmission of news from the English capital, he ordered a continuous system of posts, consisting of relays of horses and messengers every twenty miles. By this arrangement, despatches were conveyed to him at his camp with increased expedition, though, as different writers give different accounts of the speed at which the couriers travelled, it is not easy to determine the exact increase in the rate. It is nevertheless certain, that a considerable improve- ment took place, although, by the way, Edward IV. seems to have had no great desire to benefit either his age or posterity in the matter. " The natural indolence and love of pleasure of the king led to the establishment of one of the most useful and beneficial institutions of civilized life ;" * and it really seems that Edward was more anxious that his brother, the Duke of Gloucester, should be able to amuse him speedily with records of intrigues, than that his posts should subserve any national purpose. The couriers travelled at the rate of a hundred miles a day. When peace was restored, and Edward returned to his court, the relays fell into disuse", only to be revived by his successors in cases of extreme urgency. Little improvement in communication could be expected under such a course of pro- cedure, and little was effected. Henry VIII. was the first monarch who endeavoured to keep the posts in a state of efficiency, and, who, with the energy and wisdom for which he was so remarkable in matters relating to the advancement of the nation, sought to improve their or- ganization in peace as well as war. It is still noticeable, however, that the post stages were kept up, primarily, as a conve- nience to the Government for the conveyance of its despatches. Henry VIII. instituted the office of " Master of the Postes," with the entire control of the service. During the king's lifetime the office was filled by one Brian Tuke, afterwards 1 Extracts from Contemporary Documents and Letters relating to the last Ten Years of Edward the Fuurth, A.D. 1473 1483. London, 1845. " Master of the Posies: 1 2 1 Sir Brian. We gain some insight into the duties of the office, and also into the manner in which the work is done, from the following letter (found in the voluminous correspondence of Thomas Cromwell) from the "Master of the Postes," at an early period of his superintendence, no doubt in exculpation of himself and his arrangements, which seem to have been in some way called in question by the Lord Privy Seal. " The King's Grace hath no more ordinary posts, nor for many days hath had, but between London and Calais. For, sir, you know well, that except the hackney horses between Gravesend and Dover, there is no such usual conveyance in post for men in this realm as in the accustomed places in France and other parties ; for," adds Tuke, with delightful naivete, " no man can keep horses in readiness without some way to bear the charges ; but when placards are sent for such cause (viz. to order the immediate forwarding of some state packet) the constables many times be fain to take horses out of ploughs and carts, wherein can be no extreme diligence." The king's worthy secretary thus charges the post- master with remissness, and the mails with tardiness, when the facts, as gathered from the above letter, show that the Govern- ment had not gone to the trouble and expense of providing proper auxiliaries, as in France ; ergo, they could not expect the same regularity and despatch. Master Tuke then defends the character of his men : " As to the posts between London and the court, there be now but two ; whereof the one is a good robust fellow, and wont to be diligent, evil entreated many times, he and other posts, by the ' herbigeours,' for lack of horse-room or horse-meat, without which diligence cannot be. The other hath been a most painful fellow in night and day that I have known amongst the messengers. If he now slak he shall be changed as reason is." In this reign we find the first mention of the system of travelling post on the horses attached to the department of the " Master of the Postes." When the Government required the horses for a messenger travelling on its service, not carrying letters, the king's Council addressed a letter "to all mayors, sheriffs, constables, and all other of His Majesty's subjects to whom in this case it shall appertain, or to any of them." The following is a copy of a warrant issued in 1541 : 22 Her Majesty's Mails. " Forasmuch as the King's Majesty sendeth this bearer, James, one of His Majesty's pursuivants, into those parts by post upon certain of His Majesty's affairs, his pleasure and high commandment is that you see him furnished of post-horses from place to place, both outward and homeward, at reasonable prices, as ye care for His Majesty's pleasure, and as ye will answer for the con- trary at your peril." x In the same year, at the meeting of Privy Council, a warrant for payment of money spent in the king's service was made out to Brian Tuke, and called "post money." 2 Again, 3 by an order in Council at Hampton Court, 1542, Sir Brian Tuke is required by a letter either to leave there a sum of money, " for the despatch of post from time to time, as they should be sent forth with the king's letters, or else appoint one to attend here specially for that purpose, for otherwise the King's Highness's affairs should be for lack of money greatly hindered." The position of " Master of the Postes " is, at this early period, one of great anxiety, but associated with no little honour and responsibility. One day we find him accounting for reported delay in his mails in the following manner : " But, not taking upon me to excuse the posts, I will advertise you that I have known folks, which, for their own thanks, have dated their letters a day or two more before they were written, and the conveyers have had the blame ; " another day, and he is assisting in the deliberations of the Privy Council, of which he seems to have been a member by virtue of his office. Sir H. Nicholas 4 gives the name of Sir Brian Tuke amongst other members who, in 1532, signed a letter of congratulation from the Privy Council to the monarch, " on his safe arrival and most goodly passage into your towne of Calais." During the insurrection in the northern counties in the reign of Henry VIII. the rebel leaders, in order to insure a rapid transmission of orders, established regular horse posts from Hull to York, York to Durham, and Durham to Newcastle. 5 The Council of Edward VI. finding that a great many irre- gularities existed in the hire of post-horses, had an Act passed, 1 Harleian MSS. No. 283, f. 148. 2 Nicholas's Proceedings and Ordinances of the Privy Council of England, vol. vii. p. 72. 3 Ut supra, p. 133. 4 Ut supra, p. 343. 5 Froude's History of England, vol. iii. p. 185. Posts during Elizabeth's Reign. (2 and 3 Edward VI. c. 3), fixing the charge at a penW per iriilj for all horses so impressed. ^ "* The Lords of the Council in Queen Mary's reign ma( that all the posts between London and the North " shoi each of them keep a book, and make entry of every letter that he shall receive, the time of the delivery thereof into his hands, with the parties' names that shall bring it into him." Up to the end of the reign of Queen Elizabeth, no further important improvements were made, although her Council took steps to make the existing service as efficient as possible, by reforming some abuses which had crept into it during her sister's reign. Before Elizabeth's death the expenses of the post were reduced to rather less than 5,OOOZ. per annum. On her accession, the sum charged for conveying Her Majesty's despatches from stage to stage was enormous. Up even to so late as the thirty -first year of her reign, a rate of 20c. a letter was levied by the proprietors of post-horses for every stage travelled over. The Council at first resolved to pay the pro- prietors 3s. a day for the service, irrespective of the distance travelled. The payment was reduced to 2s. and ultimately to 1 8d. a day. Much interesting and curious information respecting this early service the different stages, the routes taken by the couriers of the time of Elizabeth, &c. &c. has been found in old records of the " Master of the Postes," exhumed, some twenty years ago, from the vaults of Somerset House. This functionary, it would appear, paid, as did Sir Brian Tuke, all current expenses appertaining to his department " the wages and entertainments of the ordinary posts," and he was re- imbursed in full under the grant " for the conveyance of Her Highness's letters and her Council's." The information respect- ing the routes taken is especially interesting, inasmuch as it serves to show that even at this early period arrangements were made with great circumspection, some of these early post routes existing, with but trifling modifications, down to the present century, and to the time of railways. The route from London to Berwick is shown by the list of posts (or stages) laid down between the two places in the fifteenth year of Queen Elizabeth's reign. They run as follows : 1. London ; 2. Waltham ; 3. Ware ; 4. Royston ; 5. Caxton ; 6. Huntingdon ; 7. Stilton ; 24 Her Majesty s Mails. 8. Stamford; 9. Grantham ; 10. Newark; 11. Tookesford (Tuxford) ; 12. Foroby (Ferriby) ; 13. Doncaster ; 14. Ferry Bridge; 15. Wetherby ; 16. Boroughbridge ; 17. Northal- lerton ; 18. Derneton (Darlington) ; 19. Durham ; 20. New- castle ; 21. Morpeth ; 22. Hexhain ; 23. Haltwistle ; 24. Carlisle ; 25. Alnwick ; 26. Belford ; 27. Berwick. For three centuries, therefore, the High North Road took in all these posts, with the exception of Tuxford. A considerable diversion, it will be noticed, was made at Morpeth towards the west, in order to take in the then important towns of Hexham and Carlisle ; but it is more probable that the direct post-road continued north through Alnwick to Berwick, and that the west road was only a kind of cross-post. There were no less than three post routes to Ireland in this reign, and all of them were used more or less. The first and most important, perhaps, left London and took the following towns in its way ; the distance between each town constituting a "stage;" viz. Dunstable, Dayntry (Daventry), Collsill (Coleshill), Stone, Chester, and Liverpool, from which latter place a packet sailed. The remaining two mails took slightly different routes to Holyhead, whence also a packet sailed for Ireland. We find there were also two posts between London and Bristol and the west of England ; the first going by way of Maidenhead, Newbury, Marlborough, and Chippenham ; the other, by Hounslow, Maidenhead, Heading, Marlborough, Maxfield, to Bristol. To Dover there were also two posts ; the one passing through Dartford, Gravesend, Rochester, Sittingbourne, Canterbury, Margate, and Sandwich ; the other passing through Canterbury direct, without calling at the two last-named places. The posts above enumerated were called the " ordinary " posts, and may be supposed to have been the permanent arrangements for the transmission of the Government despatches. When these posts did not avail and it must be understood that they were never allowed to make a detour into the cross-roads of the country " extraordinary posts " were established. Generally speaking, these extra posts were put on for any service which required the greatest possible haste. Here is an extract from the records of which we have spoken, on this point. " Thomas Miller, gent, sent in haste, by special com- mandment of Sir Francis Walsingham, throughout all the postes ' ' Extraordinary Posts. " 25 of Kent to warn and to order, both with the posts for an augmentation of the ordinary number of horses for the packet, and with the countries near them for a supply of twenty or thirty horses apiece for the ' throughe posts,' during the service against the Spanish navy by sea, and the continuance of the army by land." Again, in 31st Elizabeth, special or "extra- ordinary " posts were laid between London and Rye, upon unwelcome news arriving from France, " and for the more speedy advertisement of the same." "Thomas Miller, gent, sent at Easter, 1597, to lay the posts and likest landing places either in Kent or Sussex, upon intelligence given of some practices intended against the queen's person." Mr. Miller seems to have judged Rye to be the " likest landing place " for the purpose, and, returning, " received seven pound for his services." Other extraordinary posts were often laid down between Hampton Court and Southampton and Portsmouth, for the " more speedy advertisement " of occurrences from the ports of Normandy and Bretaigne. In the early part of Queen Elizabeth's reign, disputes were frequent with the foreign merchants resident in London with regard to the foreign post which up to this reign they had been allowed to manage among themselves. In 1558, the queen's Council of State issued a proclamation "for the redresse of disorders in postes which conveye and bring to and out of the parts beyond the seas, pacquets of letters." It would seem that soon after the arrival of the Flemings in this country, in the previous century, they established a post-office of their own, between London and the Continent, appointing one of themselves as postmaster, by the sufferance and favour of the reigning sovereign. " Afterwards," says Stow, * " by long custom, they pretended a right to appoint a master of the Strangers' Post, and that they were in possession of from the year 1514." This con- tinued till 1558, in which year the foreign merchants fell out among themselves over the question of appointing a postmaster. The Flemings, aided by the Spanish ambassador, chose one Raphael Vanden Putte ; the Italians, by this time a considerable body of foreigners, chose one of their number for the vacant place. Not being able to agree, the disputants referred their 1 Survey e of London , vol. ii. 26 Her Majesty's Mails. case to the English Council, when, to the surprise of the foreigners, their right to appoint at all was publicly disputed. The English merchants took up the matter very warmly, and addressed the Privy Council in two or three petitions. They took the opportunity to complain that the authorities of the foreign post had frequently acted unfairly to them, in keeping back their continental letters, and so giving the foreigners the advantage of the markets. In one of the petitions, they urged, " that it is one of the chief points of the prerogative belonging to all princes, to place within their dominions such officers aa were most trusty of their own subjects ; that the postmaster's place was one of great trust and credit in every realm, and therefore should be committed to the charge of the natural subjects and not strangers, especially in such places as had daily passages into foreign realms, and where was concourse of strangers." Further, " The strangers were known to have been the occasion of many injuries in the staying and keeping back of letters, and, in the meantime, an extraordinary would be despatched to prevent the markets and purpose." The English merchants urged that it would be doing the foreigners no in- justice to appoint an English postmaster ; no new exactions need be imposed upon them, " and such men might be placed in the office as could talk with them in their own language, and that should make as good promise, and as faithfully perform the same in all equity and upright dealings, as any stranger had done." The result was, that it was finally settled the " Master of the Postes" should have charge both of the English and foreign offices, and that the title of this functionary should be changed to " Chief Postmaster." Thomas Eandolph, afterwards Sir Thomas, who was the first to bear the title, was the Randolph whom the queen employed so often on delicate missions and ambassadorial duties to Scotland and the Continent. So much, in fact, was Randolph out of England before he was knighted, that his Post-office place must have been a mere sinecure, and bestowed upon him on account of his more important and very eminent services abroad. 1 "Randolph," wrote Sir William 1 Some doubt attaches to the person who first held the office of "chief-post- master." Thomas Randolph, one of the minor poets and dramatic writers of that era, the .Randolph of the Muses' Looking Glass and The Jealous Lovers^ lived within the period. Though he enjoyed the friendship of Ben Jouson, The Elizabethan Era. 27 Cecil to Queen Elizabeth out of Scotland, on one occasion when he accompanied that great statesman to make a treaty with the Queen Eegent there " Kandolph is worth more than I fear our time will well consider, and no poolar nor robber." 1 Under the Tudor dynasty, marvellous strides were taken in the social progress of the country. The habits of a great nation can, of course, only change gradually and slowly, but more than a revolution in religion had been worked during the dynasty of the Tudors. In the fifteenth century many social changes had commenced, it is true ; serfdom and villanage still existed in name, but they were fast disappearing as a fact. If we may credit the pictures drawn by Chaucer, and in the curious writings of Piers Ploughman and of course we may the barons and country gentry lived in a much more kindly and intimate inter- course with their dependents than they had done at any time subsequent to the Norman invasion. It was the development of trade, however, notwithstanding all this, which really com- menced with the Tudors, that gave the grand impulse to the new social era. The increased commerce spread wealth abroad, and wealth brought with it many of the elements of increased social comfort. Thanks in great part to the Lollards, who had done incalculable service for the poor, the more defenceless, the more uneducated portions of this early society, the people began to feel more interest in each other and in the affairs of the world, and in proportion as this feeling grew, the demand for interchange of thought and news became more and more urgent. Under the new order of things the conveyance of letters became a matter of the same vital necessity as the conveyance of goods or persons, and thus the same circumstances which would produce roads, bridges, and hostelries, necessarily led to the establishment of the post. In the reign of Henry VIII. the English people kept up a considerable trade with Flanders in wool. A commercial treaty subsequently gave free ingress and egress to the ships of both nations. The change that this increased trade wrought was immediate and striking. English rural districts who enrolled him, indeed, among his adopted sons, and who might have obtained him the place, yet it is tolerably certain that the emoluments of the office went to his diplomatic namesake. 1 Froude's Reiyn of Elizabeth (vol. vii. and viii. of his valuable History of England} is full of references to Thomas Randolph. 28 Her Majesty's Mails. which had before been self-supporting growing their own corn and feeding their own cattle now turned their corn-land into pasture-land, and sought grain among their neighbours. The dissolution of the monasteries under the same monarch had the effect, among other results, of scattering broadcast over the country those who had previously lived together in great seclusion, and who enjoyed almost a monopoly of learning. The Eeformation civilized as well as christianized the people. Other causes, perhaps of lesser importance, were at work, which directly operated in opening out the country and encouraging habits of locomotion, and, in this way, the spread of intelligence generally. Among many such were changes, for instance, in the routine of law procedure, introduced by Henry. Up to his time, courts of arbitration had sat from time immemorial within the different baronies of England, where disputes, especially those between landlord and tenant, were cheaply and equitably adjusted. Now such cases were ordered to be taken to London, and country people found themselves compelled to take journeys to London, and sue or be sued at the new courts of West- minster. 1 Up to this time horses afforded almost the only means of conveyance from place to place, though carriages of a kind now begin to be mentioned in contemporary accounts. The first mention of any kind of conveyance in England was made in the reign of Eichard II. The king " being threatened," says Stow, in his Surveye of London and Westminster, " by the rebels of Kent, rode from the Tower of London to Mile End, and with him his mother, because she was sick and weak, in a whirlicote" Kichard de Maidstone has described in Latin verse the grand entry of Richard II. into London, when the ladies of the court rode in two of these carts, for they were nothing else, one of which "falling over," says Mr. Wright, 2 "exposed its fair occupants in a not very decorous manner to the jeers of the multitude." The jeering, however, was not the worst conseqence, for the untoward event seems to have resulted in the banishment of coaches from the precincts of the court for near two hundred years. Stow tells us that the "luxury of coaches" was re- 1 Froude's History of England, vol. iii. p. 94. 2 History of Domestic Manners, p. 496. Travelling in 1583. 29 introduced into England in the reign of Queen Mary, when. Walter Bipon made a coach for the Earl of Rutland ; and in the year 1564, " the same artist made the first hollow turning coach, with pillars and arches," for Queen Elizabeth. The coach nothing, in fact, but a cart without springs, covered over by a gorgeous canopy, and a chair or seats fixed in it was used by the queen on one occasion when she went to open Parliament. Elizabeth would seem to have used it only once, and has left behind her a curious and most graphic account of her sufferings during the journey, in a letter written in the old French of that period to the French ambassador at her court. 1 The wagon, which had been originally contrived for ladies, now that the queen discarded it, was again in disfavour, and banished from London. It seems to have found its way into the pro- vinces, however, the gentry of that time being delighted with it. " On a certain day in 1583," we learn on the authority of Mr. Smiles, "that valyant knyght, Sir Harry Sydney, entered Shrewsbury in his wagon with his trompeter blowynge, verey joyfull to behold and see." Travelling in carriages was much more insecure, as well as difficult, than performing the journey on horseback. We could not well, in fact, exaggerate the difficulties which all kinds of travellers were required to compass at this early period. As yet there were but one or two main roads, and even these were infested by bands of robbers. The Paston Letters contain several allusions to the dangers incident to travelling in the country during the century. There seems to have been no safety except when the travellers went in company. Even in the neighbourhood of the metropolis, and certainly in all the more remote districts, the roads are described as having been not unlike broad ditches, much waterworn, and strewn with loose stones. Travellers had thus little choice but to ride on horseback or walk. The sovereign, the judges, and all gentlefolk rode. Women in general at any rate those who were not skilful horsewomen rode on pillions behind some relative or serving man. In this way Queen Elizabeth, when she rode into the city, placed herself behind her Lord Chancellor. The side-saddle was in use, it is true, at this early period, but none but the most experienced riders ventured with it, 1 Smiles' Lives of the Engineers, vol. i. 30 Her Majesty's Mails. Under all these circumstances, it cannot be wondered at that general intelligence travelled slowly. If we wonder at all, it is how special messengers, travelling with special despatches of consequence, possibly contrived to accomplish some recorded journeys in the short time they did. Among many well authen- ticated cases of the kind, we may give one from the annals of the reign of Henry VIII. On the 1st of April, 1515, the English envoy in Scotland wrote from Stirling to Henry of England : " This Friday, when I came home to dinner, I received your most honourable letters by post, dated at your mansion, Greenwich, 26th March." x The speed at which the royal courier travelled in this case would have seemed almost incredible had we not had good reason for believing that Henry VIII. kept his English couriers in a high state of perfection. Another instance is somewhat better known. Sir Robert Carey rode post with sealed lips from Eichmond in Surrey to Edinburgh in less than three days to announce the death of Elizabeth to the Scotch king. This was undoubtedly a great feat for those days, especially as the messenger rested a considerable time on two occasions during the journey. Public and private couriers riding post had other difficulties to contend with than those of bad roads and unequal accommodation difficulties which throw a curious light over the wants and conditions of the poorer portions of the community. A courier, in approaching a town, would be soon surrounded by crowds of people, urgently asking for news of the districts through which he had passed. At times, he would not be suffered to pass on without furnishing the needed information. About this time a royal courier in a Yorkshire town was maltreated because he would not or could not satisfy the curiosity of a mob which had gathered round him. Fear of such a circumstance has been known to cause the post messenger to make a detour of many miles, in order to avoid the gaze and importunity of the commonalty. Few of them ever saw a letter. Pilgrims, as .they travelled between the monasteries of the period, or who, after their dissolution, visited their shrines, dispensed news to the poor, and would occasionally 1 Mr. Lang's Historical Summary of the Post Office in Scotland, p. 3. In this and all subsequent cases we have thought it best to give the spelling of early letters and extracts as modernized. Copy of an Early Letter. 3 1 carry letters for the rich. 1 The pilgrim seems to have taken the place of the travelling minstrel of the Saxon and Norman periods. The letters of the period, many of which survive, show that great care was taken to protect them from the curiosity of the bearer ; and precautionary measures were resorted to to prevent delay. They were usually most carefully folded, and fastened at the end by a sort of paper strap, upon which the seal was affixed, whilst under the seal a piece of string or silk thread, or perhaps a straw, was frequently placed, running round the letter. The following letter, still extant, brought under the notice of the Post-office authorities by the Bishop of Llandaff, 2 in order, it would seem, to elucidate the Post-office history of the period, will serve here to give the reader an insight into the way letters were then dealt with, as well as the speed at which they were forwarded : " ARCHBISHOP PARKER TO SIR W. CECIL. " Sir, According to the Queen's Majesty's pleasure and your advertisement, you shall receive a form of prayer, which, after you have perused and judged of it, shall be put in print and published immediately, &c. " From my house at Croydon, this 22d July, 1566, at four of the o'clock, afternoon. " Your honour's always, "MATTHEW CANT." The letter is thus endorsed by successive postmasters, according to the then existing custom : " Received at Waltham Cross, the 23d of July, at nine at night. " Received at Ware, the 23d of July, at twelve at night. " Received at Croxton, the 24th of July, between seven and eight of the morning," His Grace's letter, therefore, which would appear to have been of such importance that one or more messengers were required to travel night and day, in order to deliver it at the earliest possible moment, took forty hours to travel sixty-three miles. 1 Whittaker's History of Craven, speaking of the close of the sixteenth century. Fol. edit. 2 Vide Postmaster-General's Second Report, p. 38. 3 2 Her Majesty's Mails. CHAPTER III. THE RISE OF THE GENERAL POST-OFFICE. IT was reserved for the Stuart kings to organize for the first time in England a regular system of post communication, the benefits of which should be shared by all who could find the means. England was behind other European nations in establishing a public letter post. It was not until the foreigners had drawn particular attention to their postal arrangements by their constant disputes, that the English government established a general post for inland letters, similar to the one whose benefits "the strangers " had enjoyed even prior to the reign of Henry VIII. Little progress towards this desirable end was made in the reign of the first James, if we except a better organization for the con- veyance of official despatches. At the same time, it is only fair to state that the improved organization here referred to formed the groundwork for the subsequent public post. One of the results attendant on the accession of the Scotch king to the English crown was the means of calling attention to the inadequate and imperfect arrangement in the system of horse-posts. On the 5th of April, 1603, a few days after the sycophantic Carey had hurried headlong into Scotland to salute him as king, James set out on his journey to the English capital, to take quiet possession of the crown which sat so uneasily on the heads of his descendants. He was treated most royally, as he took the different stages on the great North road, by the Stanhopes, the Shrewsburys, the Harringtons, the Burghleys, and the Sadlers of that day ; while it is amusing to note the difficulties which some of his retinue experienced in getting from one mansion to another. Then, immediately on his arrival in London, the high road from Edinburgh to the English capital became thronged night and day with the king's countrymen, who rushed forward in the zeal of a new-born enthusiasm to " The Post for the Packet" 33 congratulate the monarch whom, for " unprinceliness and un- godliness," they had all spurned but a few months before. Not Scotchmen only, but English statesmen and courtiers, " corpora- tions and officiali tes of every description," are said to have thronged all the post-roads to London, " eager to be shone upon by the new risen sun." 1 All ordinary communications fell far short of the demand ; so much so, that post-messengers riding from the Council at Edinburgh to the king in London, or mce versa, were stopped whole days on the road for want of horses, which had been taken, sometimes by force, by those who were anxious to be first with their congratulations. As some remedy for this state of things, the Lords of the English Council issued a proclamation, calling upon all magistrates to assist the post- masters " in this time so full of business" as " my Lords " naively express it, " by seeing to it that they were supplied with fresh and able horses as necessity shall require." They were to be " able and sufficient horses, well furnished of saddles, bridles, girts, and stirropes, with good guides to look to them ; who for the said horses shall demand and receive of such as shall ride on them the prices accustomed." 2 As the general intercourse between the two capitals promised to become permanent, and travelling along the principal roads increased, further general orders were published from time to time by the customary royal proclamation. Two kinds of post were established during James's reign, and both were in opera- tion together towards its close. They were known as the "thorough post," and "the post for the packet." The first, consisting of special messengers who rode " thorough post," that is, through the whole distance, "with horse and guide," was established in 1603. The couriers were ordered to pay at the rate of " twopence-halfpenny the mile" for the hire of each horse, and to pay in advance. Further, they must not ride any horse more than one stage (or seven miles in summer, and five in winter) except " with the consent of the post of the stage at which they did not change." 3 For the service of the second post, or " the post for the packet," every postmaster was bound 1 Mr. Forster's The Grand Remonstrance, p. 98. 2 Book of Proclamations, 16031609. British Museum. 3 Ibid. p. 67. 34 Her Majesty's Mails. to keep not less than two horses ready "with furniture con- venient," when, on the receipt of a " packet," or parcel contain- ing letters, from a previous stage, he was to send it on towards the next within a quarter of an hour of its receipt, entering the transaction in " a large and fair ledger paper book." As a further precaution, and in order to prevent the courier loitering on the road with any important despatch, each postmaster was required to endorse every single letter with the exact time of the messenger's arrival, just as we have seen in the case of the one found in the collection of Archbishop Parker's correspondence. For the purposes of 'this packet-post, we find it arranged that each postmaster should have ready " two bags of leather, at the least, well lined with baize or cotton, so as not to injure the letters." It also rested with the different postmasters to furnish the couriers with " hornes to sound and blow as oft as the post meets company, or at least four times in every mile." Thus arose a custom which, under modified arrangements, was strictly observed in the days of mail-coaches. 7 It will be readily observed that in the arrangements of the period there was nothing to prevent at least one of the posts being extensively used, except the important restrictions which the king put upon its use. During the reign of James none but the despatches of ambassadors were allowed to jostle the Government letters in the leather bags, " lined with baize or cotton," of " the post for the packet ; " and it was not till towards the end of the reign of his unfortunate son that this post came to be used, under certain conditions, by merchants and private persons. The " thorough post " or " express posts " were exclu- sively used in conveying the more important despatches, and in the State papers relating to the period we find frequent warrants issued for payment of these extraordinary posts. It was during the reign of James I. that the Government secured, and kept for a hundred years, certain privileges with respect to the hiring of post horses. We have seen that the royal couriers, travelling with despatches by either of the two posts, had priority of claim to sufficient horses and proper accommodation on the journey. The Government further settled by order in Council, that any person, whether travelling on the 1 See Notes and Queries, 1853, first series. Post Horses. 35 public business or not, should, if furnished with warrants from the Council, have prior claim to private individuals over post horses and proper entertainment, when they were thus able to demand either in the name of the king. In a warrant of Council, for instance, dated Whitehall, May 16th, 1630, the Privy Council orders all postmasters to furnish Sir Cornelius Vermuyden with horses and guides to enable him to ride post from London to Boston, and thence to Hatfield, where he was engaged in drain- ing the royal chace for the king. The postmasters were not always particular as to how the horses were obtained, for we find in 1625 1 that Sir Anthony Weldon complains to the Privy Council that the postmaster of Dartford violently took one of his geldings from his servant, and sent it forward as a post-horse with an ordinary packet. No action seems to have been taken in the matter, so that we may reasonably conclude that the Privy Council looked upon the matter as a venial transgression, if a transgression at all. In another case, the postmaster of the town of Daventry is the complainant. He writes to Lord Stanhope, the Chief Postmaster, that he furnished one of the king's pursuivants with two able post-horses to carry him to Coventry, and he refuses to pay for them ; but has been violent and abusive. He begs Lord Stanhope to report his proceedings to the Lord Treasurer. 2 Again, the postmaster of Dover is most severely dealt with for not using despatch in his business, so much so that we cannot wonder that his neighbour of Dartford used other people's horses without scruple. Sir John Hippesley writes from Dover to the Secretary of State, that if the Duke (Buckingham) does not send to Lord Stanhope to take some course with the postmaster there, " business will certainly miscarry ; when the Duke wrote the other day * for life,' his letter was nine hours coming the fourteen miles." Secretary Conway, in reply, writes to Sir John Hippesley, who was governor of the castle, to commit the postmaster to prison for his neglect. He knew how greatly the Government were concerned because the preparations of the French at Dunkirk increased, and it was only right that he should suffer for his slackness and constant delays ; and suffer he did. 3 1 State Papers of the Reign of James I. Domestic Series, vol. xiv. 2 Ibid. vol. xxiii. 3 Ibid. vol. xxi. D 2 36 Her Majesty's Mails. Little as James I. did towards establishing an inland post, though with materials so ready to his hand in the posts of which we have spoken, yet he deserves some credit for setting on foot a general post for letters to foreign countries. It would seem that the abuses complained of by English merchants, with regard to letters coming from abroad, had been lessened by the appointment of an English postmaster for the foreign office, but not so with letters sent abroad : hence the independent foreign post sanctioned by the king. In another of the very numerous proclamations of his reign, it is stated that His Majesty had created the office of Postmaster-General for Foreign Parts, " being out of our dominions, and hath appointed to this office Matthew de Quester the elder, and Matthew de Quester the younger." The duties of this new office are stated to consist in the " sole taking up, sending, and conveying of all packets and letters concerning his service or business, to be despatched into forraigne parts, with power to grant moderate salaries." These appointments, interfering in many ways with his department, gave great offence to Lord Stanhope, and mutual unpleasantness sprung up between the officers of the two establishments. Lord Stanhope continued by his agents to carry letters abroad, and obtained a warrant prohibiting the De Questers from interfering. Sir John Coke, addressing his fellow secretary, Lord Conway, comments on "the audacity of men in these times, and that Billingsley, a broker by trade (one of Lord Stanhope's agents), should dare to attempt thus to question the king's service, and to derive that power over foreign letters to merchants which in all states is a branch of regal authority. Neither can any place in Christendom be named where merchants are allowed to send their letters by other bodies or posts than by those authorized by the state." It would seem that Billingsley had publicly announced his intention of sending a foreign post away every Saturday to Flushing, Holland, and the Hanse Towns ; and " thereafter, if God spared his life and health, to other places." Upon this he was imprisoned, but the House of Commons ordered his release. The Council then took the matter up, and ordered him to desist from his scheme " till the matter could be determined by law." Then ensued a suit in the law courts between Lord Stanhope and the De Questers ; it lasted so long An Early Dispute. 3 7 that during the years it was pending, both offices got completely disarranged, some of Lord Stanhope's staff going without salary for as long as eight years ; " divers of them," as we find it given in a petition to the Council, " lie now in prison, by reason of the great debt they are in for want of their entertainment." The postmasters of Andover and Salisbury say that " not having had their pay for six years, they are so indebted that they cannot show their heads." 1 The dispute was not settled until after Charles had been king for six years namely, in 1632 when Lord Stanhope was induced to retire from the service of Chief Postmaster ; the elder De Quester at the same time assigning the office which he had jointly held with his son, then deceased, to William Frizell and Thomas Witherings. A royal proclama- tion was thereupon issued, which is curious enough to be given entire : " Whereas His Majesty's father, King James, of happy memory, for urgent causes did constitute an office called the office of Postmaster-General for Foreign Parts, and had appointed the De Questers to that office, but now the younger one having died, and the elder one being aged and infirm hath made and substituted William Frizell and Thomas Witherings to do all things appertaining to his office, His Majesty is graciously pleased to ratify this arrangement, and doth straightly charge and command all his people, aliens as denizens, that none of them (otherwise than the said W. Frizell and T. Witherings) presume to take up or transmit packets of letters." 2 We ought not to leave this subject without saying that James I. in establishing this foreign post seems to have been far more anxious that Government secrets should not be disclosed to foreign countries, than that the post should be of much use to traders and merchants. At the same time every endeavour was made to get at the secrets of other Governments who were less careful of their correspondence. The proclamation of the king which established the foreign post ran, that he, " affecting the welfare of his people, and taking into his princely consideration how much it imports his state and this realm, that the secrets thereof be not disclosed to foreign nations, which cannot be pre- vented if a promiscuous use of transmitting and taking up foreign 1 State Papers, Domestic Series, vol. xxi. 2 Rymer's Fcedera, torn. xix. p, 385. 38 Her Majesty's Mails. letters and packets should be suffered, forbids all others from exercising that which to the office of postmaster pertaineth, at their utmost perils." There was a motive for this jealous mono- poly of postal communications, made clearer, perhaps, by the following extract from a letter written by one of James's secre- taries to the other, Lord Conway : " Your Lordship best knoweth what account we shall be able to give in our place in Parliament of that which passeth by letters in and out of the land, if every man may convey letters as he chooseth." Sir John Coke, the writer of the above, did not confine his attention to foreign letters, if we may believe an English letter-writer, who, address- ing a friend in Scotland, wrote : " I hear the posts are way- laid, and all letters taken from them and brought to Secretary Coke ; therefore will I not, nor do you, send by that way here- after." 1 Witherings, upon whom the principal management of the Post- office now devolved, was an active and painstaking officer ; he would seem also to have made good use of his time, for in 1635, or only three years from the date of his appointment, he saw the great necessity which existed for some improvement in the postal resources of the country, and proposed to Charles's Council to " settle a pacquet post between London and all parts of His Majesty's dominions, for the carrying and recarrying of his sub- ject's letters " the first proposal ever made in England for a public letter-post. In this memorial, which justly entitles him to a front rank in the number of great postal reformers, Wither- ings stated some curious facts relating to the service of those days. " Private letters," he said, " being now carried by carriers or persons travelling on foot, it is sometimes full two months before any answer can be received from Scotland or Ireland to London." " If any of His Majesty's subjects shall write to 1 Lang's Historical Summary of the Post Office in Scotland, p. 4. lu the next reign Henrietta Maria, in one of her letters to her husband, Charles I. thus writes about Pym. A.S however, there was an air of treachery about these letters as far as relates to the great parliamentary leader, it is difficult to say whether much dependence should be placed on the fact stated in relation to the Post-office : " I received yesterday," said the queen, " a letter from Pym, by which he sends me word that he fears I am offended with him, because he has not had a letter from me for a long time. I beg you will tell him this is not the case, and that I am as much his friend as ever; but I have so much business, that I have not been able to write by expresses, and by post it is not safer Thomas Witherings. 39 Madrid in Spain, he shall receive answer sooner and surer than he shall out of Scotland or Ireland." Witherings, from these and other considerations, is led to propose that the existing Government posts should be used publicly ; that the journey between London and Edinburgh should be performed in three days, when " if the post could be punctually paid the news will come sooner than thought." Witherings' memorial had the desired effect on the Council, who at once set about making the machinery already in use applicable for a general post for inland letters. In 1635 they issued a proclamation, in which they state that there had not been hitherto any constant communication between the kingdoms of England and Scotland, and therefore command " Thomas Witherings, Esquire, His Majesty's Postmaster for forraigne parts, to settle a running post or two, to run night and day between Edinburgh in Scotland and the City of London, to go thither and back again in six days." Directions were also given for the management of the correspondence between the principal towns on the line of road. Bye posts shall be connected with the main line of posts, by means of which letters from such places as Lincoln, Hull, Chester, Bristol, or Exeter, shall fall into it, and letters addressed to these and other places shall be sent. Other bye posts are promised to different parts of the country. All post- masters on the main line of posts, as well as those of the bye posts, were commanded to have " always ready in their stables one or two horses." The charges settled by James I. were ordered to be the charges under the new system, " 2jdL for a single horse, and 5d. for two horses per mile." In a subsequent proclamation two years afterwards, a monopoly of letter-carrying was esta- blished, which has been preserved ever since in all the regula- tions of the Post-office. No other messengers or foot-posts shall carry any letters, but those who shall be employed by the king's " Chief Postmaster." Exceptions were made, however, when the letters were addressed to places to which the king's post did not travel ; also, in the case of common known carriers ; mes- sengers particularly sent express ; and to a friend carrying a letter for a friend. These exceptions, trifling as they were, were withdrawn from time to time, as the Post-office became more and more one of the settled institutions of the country. As it 4o Her Majesty's Mails. was, the prohibitory clauses caused great dissatisfaction in the country. The middle of the seventeenth century was certainly a bad time for introducing a measure that should bear any appearance of a stretch of the royal prerogative. That no one but the servants of the king's Postmaster should carry private letters was regarded as an unwarrantable interference with the liberty of the subject ; so much so, that in 1642 a Committee of the House of Commons was appointed to inquire into that part of the measure. The subject was also frequently mentioned in Parliament ; notwithstanding which, the Government strictly adhered to the clause. 1 The first rates of postage for the new service were fixed at twopence for a single letter, for any distance under 80 miles ; 4d. up to 140 miles ; 6d. for any longer distance in England ; and Sd. to any place in Scotland. Of course the distances were all reckoned from London. The control of the English letter-office was entrusted to the Foreign Postmaster- General, who had suggested the new under- taking. Witherings held the joint offices for five years, when in 1640 he was charged with abusing both his trusts, and superseded by Philip Burlamachy, a London merchant. It was arranged, however, that Burlamachy should execute the duties of his offices under the care and inspection of the principal Secretary of State. And now began a quarrel which lasted incessantly from 1641 to 1647. When the proclamation concerning the sequestration of his office was published, Witherings assigned his patent to the Earl of Warwick. Mindful of this opportunity, Lord Stanhope, the " Chief Postmaster" under the king's father, who had sur- rendered his patent some years before, now came forward and stated that the action had not been voluntary, but, as we learn from his petition to the House of Lords, he " was summoned to the Council table, and obliged, before he was suffered to depart, to subscribe somewhat there penned upon your petitioner's patent by the Lord Keeper Coventry." Lord Stanhope found a staunch friend and adherent in Mr. Edmund Prideaux, a member of the House of Commons, and subsequently Attorney- General to the 1 Blackstone, in speaking of the monopoly in letter traffic, states that it is a "provision which is absolutely necessary, for nothing but an exclusive rigrht can support an office of this sort : many rival independent offices would only serve to ruin one another." Com. voi. i. . 324. Edmund Prideaux. > . p r 41 Commonwealth. Two rival offices were establisl and continued strife was maintained between the two claimants. On one occasion, Prideaux hiinsell seize the Plymouth mail which had just arrived in Loncfi was proceeding to the office of the Earl of Warwick, near* Royal Exchange. On another day, according to the depositions of the Earl's officers, the Chester mail " was met at the foot of Highgate by five persons habited like troopers, on great horses, with pistols, who demanded of these deponents, ' Who hath the letters ? ' saying they must have them," and they seem to have kept their word. 1 Burlamachy and the Government failed to restore peace. In the Committee of the Post-office, already referred to, the subject was taken up, but the resolution of that Committee only rendered matters more complicated. Though Prideaux contrived to be made chairman of it, the Committee declared that the sequestration of two years before "was a grievance, and illegal, and ought to be taken off," and Mr. Witherings restored to office. It further decided against the Government in the question of the monopoly of letter-carrying, which the king had proclaimed in 1637. The part of the pro- clamation relating to the establishment of the monopoly ran as follows : 2 "And His Majesty's further will and pleasure is, that from the beginning of this service or employment no other mes- senger or messengers, foot-post or foot-posts, shall take up, carry, or deliver any letter or letters whatsoever, other than the mes- sengers appointed by the said Thomas Witherings, to any such place or places. And if any post-messenger or letter-carrier whatsoever shall offend contrary to this His Majesty's proclama- tion, His Majesty, upon complaint thereof made, will cause a severe exemplary punishment to be inflicted upon such delin- quents." We may be sure that the frequent subsequent disputes on this subject did not arise from any ambiguity or misreading of the above proclamation. As it was, both questions which the Committee reported upon were left in abeyance for two years longer, when, in 1644, the Parliamentary forces having begun to gain an ascendancy over those of the king, the Lords and Commons by a joint action appointed Edmund Prideaux, the 1 Journals of the House of Commons, vol. ii. pp. 493, 658. 2 llymer's Fcedera, torn. xix. pp. 649651. 42 Her Majesty's Mails. chairman of the recusant Committee of 1642, "and a barrister of seven years' standing," to the office of Chief Postmaster, which was virtually vacant. It is very amusing to note how the , monopolizing tendencies of the Crown, denounced but two years ago by the Parliament, were now openly advocated and confirmed by an almost unanimous vote of both Houses. The resolution establishing Prideaux in the office states * that the Lords and Commons, " finding by experience that it is most necessary for keeping of good intelligence between the Parliament and their forces, that post stages be erected in several parts of the kingdom, and the office of Master of the Posts and Couriers being at present void, ordain that Edmund Prideaux shall be, and hereby is, constituted Master of the Posts, Couriers, and Messengers." Prideaux must have been a very energetic and thrifty manager. He is stated to have been very zealous, and to have greatly improved the service at this early stage; "esta- blishing," according to Blackstone, "a weekly conveyance of letters to all parts of the country, thereby saving to the public the charge of maintaining postmasters to the amount of 7,000?. per annum." It seems to have been clearly seen by the Par- liament of that time that the Post-office would eventually pay its own. expenses, and even yield a revenue ; for in deciding on Prideaux's proposal, the object of its promoters is stated concisely enough in one of the clauses of the Act : " That for defraying the charges of the several postmasters, and easing the State of it, there must be a weekly conveyance of letters to all parts of the country." For fully twenty years the establishment of the post had been a burden on the public purse to the extent of three or four thousand pounds a year. Prideaux at first was allowed to take the profits of his office, in consideration of his bearing all the charges, and the Government thought they had made a capital bargain. In 1649, five years after his appointment, the amount of revenue derived from the posts reached 5,0002. a year, and a new arrangement was thought necessary. Now that the fact had dawned upon the shrewd intelligences of the Common- wealth that the Post-office might be made to pay well, there were numerous offers to take it up in the way of a farm, and thus make as much as possible out of its revenues. The practice 1 Journals of the House of Commons, vol. ii. 1644. The Post-office Monopoly. 43 of farming the Post-office revenue actually began in this year (1650) Mr. Prideaux agreeing to pay down 5,OOOZ. a year and lasted, as far as regards some of the bye posts, down to the end of last century. Prideaux himself seems to have suggested that the office might be farmed to the highest bidder, and some of the pamphleteers of that day pounced upon him very severely. One of them hoped " that the wisdom of this Parliament will not so regard the wily insinuations of any man who desires to farm the same upon pretence that the State wants money, when his only design is to enrich himself at the nation's prejudice." In the year .1649, a decided stand was made against the new Post-office monopoly. The Common Council of London esta- blished this year a Post-office for inland letters in direct rivalry to that of the Parliament. The Commons, however, although they had loudly denounced the formation of a monopoly by the Crown, proceeded to put down this infringement of theirs with uncommon vigour. The city authorities, backed, as they were in those days, by immense power, stoutly denied that the Par- liament had any exclusive privilege in the matter, or that it had any right to meddle with them. They could see no reason why there should not be " another weekly conveyance of letters and for other uses " this latter clause most probably meaning a conveyance for packets and parcels. Though pressed to do so, " they refused to seek the sanction of Parliament, or to have any direction from them in their measure." 1 " The Common Council," it is further complained by the Post-office authorities, " have sent agents to settle postages by their authority on several roads, and hath employed a natural Scott, who has gone into Scotland, and hath there settled postmasters (others than those of the State) on all that road." Prideaux took care to learn something from the rival company. He lowered his rates of postage, increased the number of despatches, and, as often happens in relation to competitive schemes, modified many of his arrangements, and then resolutely applied himself to get the city establishment suppressed. The Postmaster-General, who had just become Attorney-General, invoked the aid of the Council of State. After some debate and investigation, the Council reported that " as affairs now stand, they conceive that the office of Postmaster 1 Journals of the House of Commons, 21st March, 1649. 44 Her Majesty's Mails. is, and ought to be, in the sole power and disposal of Parliament." This announcement being considered as settling the matter decisively, the city posts were immediately and peremptorily suppressed, and from this date the carrying of letters has re- mained the exclusive privilege of the Crown. Though the Government succeeded in thus establishing a monopoly, public opinion was greatly against the measure ; the authorities of the city of London, as may well be imagined, were incessant in their exertions to defeat it, not only at this time, but on many subse- quent occasions. Pamphlets were freely written on the subject, and one of them especially deserves mention, inasmuch as its author bore a name now memorable in the annals of the British Post-office. The title of the pamphlet sufficiently explains its purport, being given as John HiWs Penny Post ; or a vindication of the liberty of every Englishman in carrying merchants' or other men's letters against any restraints of farmers of such employment. 4to. 1659. " He is the fittest man for the post," says Mr. John Hill, " who will undertake the service at the cheapest rate, which must be the best advantage to the Commonwealth ; and it is hoped that the present Councillors of State will eye the good of the public in this particular." Under the Protectorate, the Post-office underwent material changes. Whilst extending the basis of the Post-office, Cromwell took advantage of the State monopoly to make it subservient to the interests of the Commonwealth, Of this there cannot be a doubt. One of the ordinances published during the Protectorate sets forth that the Post-office ought to be upheld, not merely because it is the best means of conveying public and private communications, but also because it may be made the agent to *' discover and prevent many wicked designs, which have been and are daily contrived against the peace and welfare of the Common- wealth, the intelligence whereof cannot well be communicated except by letters of escript." 1 Through the agency of the Post-office, several little matters were brought to light which saved much trouble to the Privy Council of this period. Foreign and home letters shared the same fate. On one occasion the Venetian ambassador remonstrated openly that his letters had been delayed and read, and it was not denied. Of course 1 Scobell's Acts and Ordinances, p. 511, anno 1654. Proceedings in Parliament. 45 English letters shared the same fate on the Continent, and in this way the English people were acting only on the principle of diamond cut diamond. Still the facts are as we have stated, as may be more fully seen by reference to the reports of the Secret Committee of the Post-office on letter-opening in 1844. To such an extent, moreover, had this state of things been carried, that a distinct clause in the Post-office Act, passed in the next reign, provided that " no one, except under the immediate warrant of one of our principal secretaries of state, shall presume to open any letters not directed unto themselves." It would have been well had no such provision been made, or so long continued in existence, for a system of espionage was thus settled which has always been abhorrent to the nature and feelings of Englishmen. But we are doing but scant justice to the Council of the Commonwealth, inasmuch as they only fol- lowed the course of previous governments, and gave public intimation of so much of their intention, which other govern- ments had not done. In other respects also great improvements were introduced. The Post-office now for the first time became the subject of parliamentary enactments, the Acts passed during the interregnum becoming the models for all subsequent measures. In the year 1656, an Act " to Settle the Postage of England, Scotland, and Ireland" was passed, and henceforth the Post- office was established on a new and broad basis. The account of the third reading of this Act is of sufficient interest and importance to be partly quoted here. 1 The Bill having been brought up for the last reading Sir Thomas Wroth said: "This Bill has bred much talk abroad since yesterday. The design is very good and specious ; but I would have some few words added for general satisfaction : to know how the moneys shall be disposed of, and that our letters shall pass free." Lord Strickland said : " When the report was made, it was told you that it (the Post-office) would raise a revenue. It matters not what reports be abroad, nothing can more assist trade and commerce than this intercourse. Our letters pass better than in any part whatsoever. In France and Holland, and other parts, letters are laid open to public view, as occasion is." 1 Burton's Diary of the Parliament of Cromwell, vol. iii. 46 Her Majesty's Mails. Sir Christopher Pack is also of opinion, "That the design of the Bill is very good for trading and commerce ; and it matters not what is said abroad about it. As to letters passing free for members, it is not worth putting in any A'ct." Colonel Sydenham said : " I move that it may be committed to be made but probationary ; it never being a law before" The Bill was referred to a committee, and subsequently it passed nearly unanimously. It was ruled that there " shall be one General Post-office, and one officer styled the Postmaster- General of England and Comptroller of the Post-office." This officer was to have the horsing of all " through " posts and persons "riding post." "Prices for the carriage of letters, English, Scottish, and Irish," as well as foreign, and also for post horses, were again fixed. All other persons were forbidden " to set up or employ any foot-posts, horse-posts, or packet-boats." Two exceptions were made to this prohibitory clause in favour of the Universities of Oxford arid Cambridge, " who may use their former liberties, rights, and privileges of having special carriers to carry and re-carry letters as formerly they did, and as if this Act had not been made." The Cinque Ports also must "not be interfered with, and their ancients rights of sending their own post to and from London shall remain intact." It does not appear why Prideaux's connexion with the Post- office was dissolved, nor yet exactly when. Probably his more onerous duties as first law officer of the Government demanded all his energies. However it was, we hear no more of him in connexion with the Post-office after his victory over the for- midable City magnates. At the Restoration, Prideaux retired to his native Cornwall, in the possession of considerable wealth ; much of it, we may reasonably assume, the result of his prudent management of the Post-office revenue. During the remaining years of Cromwell's life, these revenues wonderfully augmented by Prideaux's care and forethought were farmed for the sum of 10,000. a year, to a Mr. John Manley. In the words of the grant, "the office of postage of letters, inland and foreign, is hereby given, September, 1654, to John Manley, Esq. for a term, under a yearly rent and conditions, with several powers and privileges." 1 During Manley's tenure of office, the proceeds 1 Scobell's Acts and Ordinances, p. 358, anno 1654. " The Post-office Charter" 47 must either have increased with marvellous rapidity, or the con- tracts were greatly under-estimated ; for when, in 1659, Manley left the Post-office, he calculated that he had cleared in that and the previous year, 14,OOOZ. annually. A parliamentary com- mittee, in 1660, instituted a strict scrutiny into the proceeds of the office in the first year of the Kestoration ; at which period it, of course, became necessary that a new postmaster should be appointed. It was agreed by the members of this committee to recommend that a much higher sum be asked from the next aspirant to the office, inasmuch as they found that Manley, instead of over-estimating his receipts, had erred on the other side, and that they could not have come far short of the annual sum of 20,OOOZ. Mr. Henry Bishop was appointed Postmaster-General at the Eestoration, on his entering into a contract to pay to Govern- ment the annual sum of 21,500?. In a book of curious proclama- tions, &c. presented to the British Musuem by George III. there is one, dated 1660, relating to this appointment, and issued by Charles II. "for the quieting the Postmaster-General in the execution of his office." In this order, or " indenture," as it is called, all other persons except those employed by " our trusty and well-beloved Henry Bishop, Esq. our new Postmaster- General," are forbidden to carry or interfere in any way with the carriage of letters, " as they shall answer at their utmost perils." In the same proclamation, the king "exempts and discharges" all officers connected with the Post-office from serving upon juries, inquests, musters, or any public employment or attend- ance, " so that they may be the better able to attend to their important business." The settlement of the Post-office, made under the Common- wealth, was confirmed in almost all its particulars on the return of the Stuarts to power. The statute 12 Car. II. c. 35, re-enacts the ordinance of Cromwell ; and on account of its being the earliest recognised statutory enactment, was commonly known as the "Post-office Charter." It remained in full force until 1710. The following is the important preamble to the statute in question : " Whereas, for the maintenance of mutual corre- spondencies and prevention of many inconveniences happening by private posts, several public post-offices have been heretofore 48 Her Majesty's Mails. erected for carrying of letters by post to and from all parts and places within England, Scotland, and Ireland, and several parts beyond the seas, the well ordering whereof is a matter of great concernment, and of great advantage, as well for the preservation of commerce as otherwise, Be it enacted, &c." The monopoly of post-horses for travelling was re-secured under 12 Car. II. c. 35, and it will be well to bear this fact in mind, as it brought a considerable item to the net revenue of the Post-office, and helps to account for the rapid increase in that revenue. By a clause in the act referred to, no traveller could hire horses for riding post from any but authorized postmasters. Lord Macaulay states that there was an exceptional clause to this Act, to the effect that " if a traveller had waited half an hour without being supplied, he might hire a horse wherever he could ;" but this must have been an arrangement made by some supplementary statute. The Act in question remained in force, under certain limitations, until 1779. We have now arrived at an interesting period in the history of the Post-office. At the Restoration, the institution rose into some degree of eminence ; Acts were passed for its management more frequently than ever, inasmuch as its bearing on every relationship of life had become a matter beyond question. Vague and imperfect before, the materials for the history of this department of State are, from this time, full and minute, and all the incidents and circumstances relating to its management are care- fully preserved. We may now describe the Post-office with great particularity of detail, with what amount of interest the reader will, of course, be the best judge. From the time of James II. to the present day, the records of the Post-office have been kept with scrupulous care, and we regard it as no small privilege to have been allowed to examine them. It has, since 1684, been the invariable custom to chronicle the most minute details in the official letter-books, and these books have been preserved in an almost unbroken series at the General Post-office. For several years previously the papers and documents relating to the Post-office, in common with all other departments of Govern- ment, are quite as carefully preserved in the archives of the State- Paper Office ; and thus, thanks to the care of the authorities, and the labours of such diligent students of history as Mr. Petitions to the Treasury. 49 Brewer, Mr. Bruce, and Mrs. Green, we are not without light for even the earlier periods of the Stuarts' dynasty. The papers relating to the Post-office, for instance, calendered by Mrs. Green, 1 are extremely interesting, and some are in the highest degree amusing. They principally consist of requests and petitions to the Privy Council or the Commissioners of the Treasury. The burden of most of them is that of suffering under the iron rule of Cromwell ; of rejoicing now that Charles has got his own again ; with everybody loyal to a fault. Thus, John Oldcombe wants to be postmaster of Staines, and assures the Council that the postmaster who then shared the troubles and emoluments of that office, " is a dangerous man, put in by that tyrant Oliver." No more in fear of Cromwell, who hangs a scarecrow on the gibbet near Tyburn turnpike, George Cooling asks to be restored to the office of postmaster of Doncaster, from which he was dismissed by "the late pretended Protector." Then Richard Rosser, of Exeter, wants to be made postmaster of that place, and writes in a taking, lachrymose vein. " He has been a constant sufferer from the tyranny of His Majesty's enemies." He would never have mentioned his sufferings " in the great joy of the Restoration," but for his wife and children " those patient partakers of all his troubles." The bait does not take, so Rosser tries the double fly. He tells the Secretary of State that he will be glad to take either Exeter or Plymouth. He also says that he " was the first man in Exeter to be taken up and imprisoned on all occasions during the late troubles, and has had his estate detained during 16 years, yet constantly pro- vided for all prisoners sent to the gaol for loyalty." Sometimes the answer returned is recorded, but there does not appear to have been any return made to Rosser for all his services and sufferings, despite his importunities. Like all sycophants, he seems to have overdone it, even for the chartered libertines of the Restoration. James Dawson asks for little, and we are glad he was not refused. He wishes to carry the post letters, as a bye post, between Leeds and Ferrybridge. His father was a man of property, but Lord Fairfax had destroyed it all at the siege of Leeds. 1 Calendar of State Papers of the reign of Charles IL Domestic Series. 16601669. ' 50 Her Majesty's Mails. Major Hugh Pennant 1 writes to Secretary Nicholas for the postmastership of Holyhead, which his "knowledge of Wales and Ireland would enable him well to discharge." In the reign of the king's father he was very loyal, and as a return for his loyalty, was "sequestered, imprisoned, and obliged to fly the country." No dbubt but that the officers put into place during the Commonwealth would have a hard time of it, and be closely watched, whether deserving men or not. In 1662, Colonel Slingsby, the governor of the Isle of Wight, writes to the Council that he "has suspended the postmaster there as a schismatical knave, put in by the Eump officers, through whom several packets have miscarried," and requests his dismissal, that way may be made for some one more loyal. One important resolution in Parliament, at the end of the session in which the Post-office Bill was earned, augurs better for the well-being of the deserving official : for it sets forth that the Post-office being now settled so satisfactorily, " such of the persons who have contributed their pains in improve- ment of the office be recommended to the King's Majesty for consideration to be had of the pains therein taken accord- ingly." Let us hope (for we find no further mention of the matter) that all concerned got their deserts. Tardy as the English Government was, compared with its continental neigh- bours, in rearing the institution of the post, the foundation of an establishment was now laid which has for many years distanced all competitors in its resources, and in the matter of liberal pro- vision for the people. In rewarding, therefore, those who con- tributed so much to this success at this early period in the history of the establishment, King Charles would simply pay a first instalment of the debt which future generations would owe to them. Mr. Bishop remained at the head of the Post-office, notwith- standing that several powerful claimants, such as Mr. Frizell and a nephew of Witherings, who had been supplanted during the Commonwealth, put in petitions. But he was left undisturbed for only about two years. In 1662 he was dismissed for certain 1 A progenitor of the present Colonel Pennant, of that locality, in all probability. Bishop and O'Neale. 5 1 malpractices, and in March, 1663, the office of Postmaster- General is granted to Daniel O'Neale, groom of the bedchamber, as the king's warrant describes him, for the term of seven years. O'Neale engaged to pay the same rental as Bishop, in consider- ation of which he took all the profits. The indenture drawn out on the occasion, which, like all others of the period, is carefully preserved in the State Paper Office, * further ordered him " to give in a catalogue of all officers employed by him ; to dismiss all those excepted against by a Secretary of State, to whom all alterations in postage or erection of post-stages are to be submitted." On the other hand, the Government engaged to make allowances for losses in the revenue, " in case of plague, civil war, or any defects in his grant, with liberty to surrender his office at three months' notice." As O'Neale had the office over the disastrous years of the Plague and the Great Fire, when the Post-office was burned down, it must have been considered a fortunate circumstance that such a reservation was made in his contract. At the end of O'Neale's term of office (but after a fresh contract had been entered upon) the House of Commons took advantage of the occasion to desire His Majesty that " no further grant or contract of the Post-office be again entered into till a committee inspect the same, and see what improvements may be made in the revenue, as well as in the best management of the department." They said that it was evident that the revenue of the office was increasing at a greater rate than had been paid for the farm for several years past. They pray that the office may be given to the highest bidder. His Majesty replies that he is not satisfied with the hands in which it has been. Notwith- standing that a measure was carried requiring the officers of the Post-office in London and the country to take the oaths of allegiance and supremacy, and notwithstanding that these oaths were properly subscribed, His Majesty is not at all satisfied, " for the extraordinary number of nonconformists and disaffected persons in that office," and would almost welcome a change. When a fresh term was expired, His Majesty " will have a care to see it raised to that profit it may fairly be, remembering always that, it being an office of much trust as well as a farm, it 1 State Papers, Charles II. 16601669, E2 5 2 ' Her Majesty's Mails, will not be fit to give it to him that bids most, because a dis- honest or disaffected person is likeliest to exceed that way." There cannot be a doubt now that the king's words on this occasion were meant to prepare the minds of his faithful Commons for the successor which he had by this time fully resolved upon. But we are to some extent anticipating matters. Complaint was made early in the reign of Charles II. that a wholesale system of letter-opening had been started at the General Post- office. Members of Parliament were amongst the complainants. The attention of the Privy Council having been called to the subject, the king issued another proclamation " for quieting the Postmaster-General in his office," and spoke out decisively against letter- opening without sufficient warrant from the Secre- tary of State. Nor should we forget to state that no means were spared to make the Post-office fruitful during the reign of Charles II. Not only were direct measures sanctioned, but others which had only a bearing on the interests of the Post- office were introduced, and easily carried through the Houses. In 1663, the Turnpike Act made its first appearance on our Statute-book, and we may get from the preamble to this useful Act some idtea of the impediments which existed at that time to postal communications. It sets forth that the great North Road the main artery for the post-roads and the national intercourse was in many parts " very vexatious," " almost impassable," and " very dangerous." The Turnpike Act provided for needful improvements, and was the beginning of legislation on that subject. In 1675, in the fifteenth year of the reign of Charles II. an Act was passed entitled " an Act for settling the profits of the Post-office, and a power of granting wine licenses, on His Royal Highness the Duke of York, and his heirs male in perpetuity." In 1674, the revenue was farmed at 43,000?. per annum, and two years afterwards Sir William Petty calculated that since 1635 the number of letters had increased in the proportion of 20 to 1. In 1685, the net revenue had increased to the sum of 65,000?. per annum ; so that if twenty years before it was an object to keep it from the public, it was more so now than ever. In the last-mentioned year, when the Duke of York became James II. The Duke of York. 53 he not only still kept the revenue in his own hands, but he obtained an Act in the first year of his reign, securing it to himself, with a proviso that it should hereafter be to him, his heirs, and successors, one entire and indefeasible estate in fee simple, and that therefore as such its revenues were not to be accounted for to Parliament. We may as well say here that at the Eevolution the Parliament resumed the grant, and nominally did away with it, yet the king still received the money, and left no authentic records of the amounts behind him. With Queen Anne, as we shall see, the matter was put on a much more satisfactory basis. Within the last two years of the reign of Charles, a penny post was set up in London, the consideration of which we will defer to another chapter. It only remains here to state that Charles commenced the practice of granting pensions out of the Post-office revenue. Just before he died he desired his brother to make provision for Barbara Palmer, Duchess of Cleveland, one of his mistresses, out of the Post-office receipts. James II. in the same year he ascended the throne, acted on the wishes of the " merry monarch " by granting her a pension of 4,700/. a year. This pension was paid to the Dukes of Grafton as her representatives up to the year 1856, when 91,181Z. 17s. 7d. was paid down to the present duke to redeem the grant. 54 Her Majesty's Mails. CHAPTER IV. THE POST-OFFICES OF ENGLAND AND THE SISTER COUNTRIES UP TO END OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. THE penny Post-office referred to at the conclusion of the last chapter was originated in 1683 for the conveyance of London letters and parcels, by Mr. Kobert Murray, an uphol- sterer. Like many other persons living at that time, Murray was dissatisfied that the Post-office had made no provision for the carrying of correspondence between the different parts of London. By the then existing arrangements, communication was much more easy between town and country than within the limits of the metropolis. Murray's post, got up at great cost, was soon assigned to Mr. William Dockwra, a name which figures for many succeeding years in Post-office annals. The regulations of the new penny post were, that all letters and parcels not exceeding a pound weight, or any sum of money not above 10?. in value, or parcel worth not more than 10?. might be conveyed at a charge of one penny in the city and suburbs, and of twopence to any distance within a given ten-mile circuit. Six large offices were opened at convenient places in London, and receiving houses were established in all the prin- cipal streets. Stow says 1 that in the windows of the latter offices, or hanging at the doors, were large placards on which were printed, in great letters, "Penny post letters taken in here." "Letter carriers," adds this old chronicler, "gather them every hour, and take them to the grand office in their respective districts. After the said letters and parcels are duly entered in the books, they are delivered at stated periods by other carriers." The deliveries in the busy and crowded streets near the Exchange were as frequent as six and eight times a day ; even in the outskirts as many as four deliveries were made. 1 Sureeye of London, vol. ii. The Penny Post-office. 55 The penny post was soon found to be a great and decided success. No sooner, however, was that success apparent, and it was known that the speculation was becoming lucrative to its originator, than the Duke of York, by virtue of the settle- ment made to him, complained of it as an infraction of his monopoly. Nor were there wanting other reasons, inducing the Government to believe that it was wrong to allow the penny post to continue under separate management from the General Post. The Protestants loudly denounced the whole concern as a contrivance of the Popish party to facilitate the communi- cation of their plans of rebellion. The famous Dr. Gates hinted that the Jesuits were at the bottom of the scheme, and that if the bags were examined, they would be found full of treason. 1 The city porters, too, complained that their interests were attacked, and long tore down all the placards they could reach which announced to the public the establishment of this inno- vation on their rights. The Government, however, seems to have thought little of all the clamour, although undoubtedly moved at the success of the undertaking. Hence the appeal to the Court of King's Bench, which decided that the new office with all its profits and advantages should become part and parcel of the royal establishment. Docwra was even cast in slight damages and costs. Thus commenced at the General Post-office the branch long known as the " London District Office," which existed as a separate establishment from this time until 1854. At the accession of William and Mary, Mr. Docwra was appointed to the office of Controller of the District Post. This was meant as some sort of compensation for his losses, and was recommeifded by a committee of the House of Commons. In the third year of the reign of the new sovereigns, a writ of Privy Seal was issued granting Docwra a pension of 500Z. a year for seven years, "in consideration of the good services performed to the Crown in inventing and settling the business of the penny Post-office." We do not find that James II. made any grants of pensions during his short reign out of the Post-office revenue. He doubtless required all the money he could raise ; often in reply to claims of payment, the petitioners of this period are told that 1 Macaulay't History, vol. i. pp. 387, 388. 56 Her Majesty's Mails. their just demands shall be attended to when " His Majesty's affairs become less pressing." Under William and Mary the pressure cannot have been so great, for their Majesties con- siderably augmented the list of pensioners. 1 In 1694 the list stood thus : Duchess of Cleveland 4,700 Earl of Rochester 4,000 Duke of Schomberg 4,000 Duke of Leeds . 3,500 Earl of Bath 2,500 Lord Keeper Soniers 2,000 William Docwra 500 The pension to Lawrence Hyde, Earl of Rochester, was given from " a grateful sense of numerous good services performed," especially in the office of Lord High Treasurer, and at the Revolution ; that to Leeds, of 3,500Z. was " for negociating our royal marriage." The writ of Privy Seal granting the pension of Sir John Somers, Knight, Keeper of the Great Seal, dated 15th of May, 1694, sets forth that it is given "for the better and more honourable support and maintenance of him during his custody of our Great Seal." The grant to Maynard, Duke of Schomberg and Leinster, deserves more attention, considering that the pension is still paid in great part, and little is known or remembered of the circumstances under which it was granted. The wording of the writ of Privy Seal, dated February, 1694, is more full and particular than in any previous case. 2 We extract the following : 1 In considering the subject of these Post-office pensions and it is the cus- tom to speak very severely concerning; them respect should be had to the undoubted fact that the revenues of the Post-office then belonged to, and were at the sole disposal of, the sovereign. In rewarding faithful services (and surely William and Mary set an admirable example in this respect ; though evidently mistaken in his estimate of Carmarthen (Leeds) his recognition w:is just and appreciative of the sterling qualities of Lord Somers, so justly eulogized in the glowing pages of Macaulay, and of the almost pious attach- ment of Schomberg) they only displayed their munificence with what was really their own. This is worthy of praise rather than blame. After Anne had pensioned Marlborough, no other grant was made from the Post-office receipts, inasmuch as Parliament now fully claimed the control of the revenue derived from this branch of the public service. 2 Book of Warrants and Grants, 16901698. Post-office Pensions. ^ /c - 57 igland, taking into " Whereas, soon after our accession to tlie crown of Englal.^ _. n f our princely consideration the great, faithful, and acceptable seNfH performed by Frederick, Duke of Schomberg, last Master-GeneraTbfJwfy Ordnance, and Captain-General of our land forces (since deceased), and mOTe^ especially reflecting upon his most prudent conduct under us, not only in the hazardous attempt which we have made unto this kingdom for redeeming the same from popery and arbitrary power, but also in his continued endeavours to serve us, in order to the completing a prosperous, happy, and settled con- ditions of affairs in our kingdom." The warrant then goes on to describe the great losses and the destruction of his castle on the continent " sustained on account of his professing the Protestant religion," and these and other most weighty considerations, disposing them " to confer upon the said duke and his posterity a reward for his merit which might create a lasting remembrance of the gracious sense we had of his services," " we therefore fully resolved and determined to bestow upon the said duke the full sum of 100,000/. which sum was to be laid out in the purchasing of lands of inheritance. But the grant which was intended by us as aforesaid not passing under our great seal by reason of the sudden departure of the said Duke Frederick for the kingdom of Ireland, where he was slain in our service at the memorable battle of the Boyne, and also by reason that the necessity of our affairs would not admit the speedy payment of so considerable a sum of money, we were graciously pleased to allow to Charles, late Duke of Schomberg, (who hath been also slain in our service at the battle of Marsaglia in Piedmont) the sum of 4,000/. per annum, as interest or forbearance of the sum of 100,000^. We, therefore, reflecting upon the great merits of the said duke, and being no less sensible of the good, faithful, and constant services to us performed by Maynard, now Duke of Schomberg (third son of Frederick, and brother of Charles), resolve that he shall receive the like allowance of 4,000/. per annum, and to continue till we can pay or satisfy the sum of 100,000." This sum has never been satisfied, the pension having been paid by the Post-office to, the heirs of the duke up to the year 1856, when 20,0007,. were paid to redeem a fourth part of the pension or grant, the burden of the remaining part being then transferred to the Consolidated Fund. We may as well say here that among the subsequent pensions granted out of the Post-office revenues, Queen Anne gave one, in 1707, of 5,OOOZ. to the Duke of Marlborough and his heirs for ever ; and that this pension and the one to the heirs of the Duke of Schomberg are the only ones which have not been purchased or fallen in. The pension to Docwra was made out for seven years, but he held it for three years longer, on a new patent, till the year 1700, when he lost both it and his office, on certain charges of 58 Her Majesty's Mails. gross mismanagement having been brought against him. The officers and messengers under his control memorialized the Treasury Lords in a spirited but ill-written petition, which we are here able to give from the Treasury Book of that date. The following, we believe, has never before been given entire : " The aforesaid William Docwra doth what in him lies to lessen the revenue of the Penny Post Office, that he may farm it or get it into his own hands, as he claims it his right, and the ways and means are as follows. Istly. He hath removed the General Post Office from Cornhill, a place most proper, being near the Change and in the heart of the city, to a place more remote and altogether improper, whereby the messengers' walks are altered from one to two hours, so that letters are delayed this time, to the great hindrance of business and fatigue to the poor messengers, and 100/. charge to His Majesty to fit up his house for his own convenience. Sndly. He forbids the taking in of any band-boxes (except very small) and all parcels above a pound, which when they were taken in did bring in considerable advantage to this office, they being now at great charge sent by porters in the city, and coaches and water- men into the country, which formerly went by penny post messengers much cheaper and more satisfactory. 3rdly. He stops under specious pretences most parcels that are taken in, which is great damage to tradesmen by losing their customers or spoiling their goods, and many times hazard the life of the patient when physic is sent by a doctor or apothecary. 4th. That he takes out the one half or some part of several parcels, and sends the other forward, which, if not discovered, 'tis to be supposed he keeps to his own use, however a great fatigue to the owner to run up and down after it. And when the party do come, Mr. Dockwra will not be spoken with or is deny'd for most part of the day when he is within doors, which causes persons to make several journeys six or seven miles to town and back again for no purpose. Sthly. He opens several letters and reads them publicly in the office, and others he takes out bills and sends the letters forward without them. 6th. That he fatigues and oppresses all officers and messengers (except his own creatures) belonging to the six offices, that no man can live easy under him, and only to find faults to turn them out that he may bring his own creatures in, as he himself declares that he cannot bring his own purposes about till all Mr. Castleton's men (as he calls the old officers) are turned out. 7th. That he buys all contingencies (e.g. stores paid for by the authorities) himself, and sets down what he pleases without control, and what he buys (as paper, packthread, pencils, &c.) are such sorry stuff not fit to be used. 8th. That he takes money of the poor mes- sengers when any comes in upon the death or turning out of another. 9th. That the said Mr. Dockwra, with two or three officers confederate with him, hath from time to time knowingly wronged His Majesty of his revenue." And thus this catalogue of the worst abuses, stopping and appropriating letters and parcels, intimidating, buying and William Docwra. 59 selling, and worrying the men is brought to a close. It gives us a vivid, though evidently an exaggerated, picture of the efforts of a man, somewhat unscrupulously endeavouring to get back or hold his own. We cannot wonder, however, that after this memorial, and some of the charges being partially substan- tiated. Docwra was removed from all connexion with the depart- ment. In 1702, Docwra applied himself to Queen Anne to get some compensation for his losses. He stated that he had spent a considerable fortune for the benefit of posterity, and now six of his family of seven children are unsettled and unprovided for in his old age. It is almost pitiable to read the concluding paragraph in his petition to the queen, seeing how much he really accomplished for posterity, though it is not wonderful that it failed to produce the desired effect : " Your petitioner," says poor Docwra, "prostrates himself at your Majesty's feet, the throne being the refuge of the oppressed subjects and unhappy sufferers ; never believing that your Majesty's incomparable goodness and entirely English heart can let a faithful English subject be forgot and his family languish in ruin merely for doing good to his country, but that your petitioner shall find speedy redress from so admirable a queen, whose piety and justice, so conspicuous when in a private state, must by advancing goodness as well as greatness establish the throne, and render it most illustrious." In the year 1696 we find the Postmasters-General, Sir Robert Cotton and Thomas Frankland, Esq. who had succeeded Sir John Wildman six years before, proposing to erect different cross-posts in the country. In October of that year they propose a post to go twice a week between Bristol and Exeter, estimating the entire expenses at 259Z. 10s. per annum ; each postmaster of the seven stages to be erected over that ground to receive on the average 35Z. per annum ; the distance of sixty-five miles to be performed in twenty-four hours. In making the proposal to the Lords of the Treasury, the Postmasters- General proceed very cautiously, and show themselves to have been shrewd and able men. They tell them that if the post is established the letters will have to pay but one port (postage) instead of two as formerly. A letter from Bristol to Exeter, for instance, would, be charged one postage from Bristol to London, and another 60 Her Majesty *s Mails. from London to Exeter ; under the new arrangement the letters would not come to London at all, but would just be sent and charged for the distance between the two places. " This would make a serious diminution in the revenue," say they, " only the number of letters will probably be so increased by the means of more expeditious and direct conveyance, as not only to make up for the other loss, but bring in an addition to the receipts." Not only so, " but the tediousness and charge of conveying so few letters under the old system is intolerable." In any case, say they, and supposing it should fail as a financial scheme, the new post " will be a great convenience and benefit to trade." This post was established, and in the course of two or three years it realized an extra revenue of four or five hundred pounds annually. Encouraged by this success, another proposal is soon after made to lay a similar post between Bristol and Shrewsbury ; but this does not seem to have been accomplished. The cross- post system was not thoroughly developed till the next generation, the manner of which development will be seen further on. From the last case, the reader will understand that the Lords of the Treasury looked very sharply after the Post-office revenue, and many are the instances where reasonable reforms were refused on account of their being likely to reduce, even for a time, the amount of money raised by the carriage of letters. About this time, for example, the gentlemen of Warwick complained that their letters sent from London lost many hours on account of being sent through Coventry instead of direct to Warwick. The Treasury Lords ask the opinion of the Post-office authorities as to the propriety of a change, but they soon give a decided negative to the proposal when they learn the bearing which such a change will have upon the revenue. The Postmasters-General remark that " the post to Warwick having constantly gone by way of Coventry, each single letter to Warwick hath always been charged 3d. as being above eighty miles distant. Now Warwick being but really sixty-seven from London, if the post should go the nearest way to it, a penny per letter must be abated, which, together with the charge of setting up some new stages, may amount to a loss of 200?. a year." This, of course, is enough for the Lord High Treasurer, and we can scarcely hope that he would relent at the shrewd words with which the Post- Reduction of Rates. 61 masters- General close their letter : " We are of opinion, never- theless, that the alteration these gentlemen propose may probably bring an increase of letters, and likewise be of advantage to the country." It is curious and suggestive that such anomalies, which the Warwick people pointed out in 1698, should continue till the time of penny postage ; such, however, was the fact. Had the authorities of the Post-office been blessed with a little more power, seeing that there was at least the glimmering of the true business principle in them, things might not have continued so long crooked. In the eyes of the Lords of the Treasury, however, present profits were regarded with pleasure, and con- served with a strictness which no prospect of increased' future revenue could beguile them into abandoning. Another remark- able instance is recorded in the Treasury Book 1 of the period, proving in still clearer light how much wiser the Post-office authorities were than the Executive that held them in check. In the year 1692, William and Mary granted a patent to a Mr. Thomas Neale, "to settle post-offices in our plantations of North America, " which Neale did with great success. Into the interesting story of this settlement it is impossible for us here to enter ; suffice it to say that Neale afterwards applied for increased powers in the matter, and to settle the amount of postages between different parts of North America and the West Indian Islands. When the English Postmasters-General come to speak of the proposals of the American deputy, they humbly submit that the amounts which he puts down are too high, " it having been found by experience in this office," say they, " that the easy and cheap corresponding doth encourage people to write letters, and that our English revenue was very little in proportion to what it now is since the postage was reduced from Qd. to 3d. ; the number of letters being so increased here, we therefore do believe such a settlement may be attended with the like effect in these parts." The Treasury Lords were slow to sanction any measure demanding much outlay, and from the frequent applications which were made to them by deputy postmasters, before the century closed, to remit their accounts of long standing, which they were " no ways able to pay," we may imagine that their i Treasury Letter Book, 1G9 11699. 62 Her Majesty's Mails. hands were full, and their temper somewhat soured. The Treasury Letter Book relating to this reign teems with petitions to the effect that the petitioners have been nearly ruined during the first years of William and Mary, " through much spoiling of their horses by officers riding post in the late blessed Revolution." Others grumble at the lowness of their salary. For instance, Ealph Kishton, late deputy-postmaster of Preston, tells the Treasury Lords that " for many years he provided horses, and despatched the packets between Wigan and Kendal, which is a hundred north country miles, forwards and backwards, for a salary of only 70L per annum ; and also found horses and despatched packets from Wigan to Lancaster, which is sixty-eight long miles, for a salary of 50L per annum, spending his whole time with the two services ; and, though your petitioner begun with a considerable fortune, he is now penniless and beggared, and dismissed the office because he is in arrears." He prays that his debts may be remitted, and that the Postmasters-General may not be per- mitted " to pursue him and put him in prison." Other deputies argue that it was all very well that during the civil wars and at the Revolution they should have low salaries, because they were then exempted from having soldiers quartered upon them, but now that the time of peace had happily come, they urge that their salaries should be raised. In many instances, the Post- office authorities support these prayers. Into the details of the Post-office Packet Service, managed by the able and indefatigable Postmasters-General of whom we have been speaking, we will not here enter until we come to speak of them under Queen Anne. We have already delayed long enough our notice of the Scotch and Irish establishments. Almost the first mention of anything relative to the Post-office or posts in Scotland occurs in the proceedings of the munici- pality of Aberdeen. 1 It would seem that long before there was any regular post in Scotland, special messengers were employed by different townships to carry letters certain short distances, say between one town and the next adjoining principal town. In the 16th century, the city of Aberdeen kept a special officer con- stantly employed, who was called the " common post," for the sole purpose of carrying letters; and in September, 1595, according 1 Chambers' Domestic Apnals of Scotland, vol. i. The Scotch Post-office. 63 to Kennedy, 1 this individual, named " Alexander Taylor, alias Checkum" was ordered by the magistrates a livery of blue, with the city arms painted on the left sleeve of his coat. Other persons were also employed in emergencies, " and the town's disbursements on this ground continue to occupy a prominent place in its accounts down to 1650, if not later." The first regular letter post established in Scotland was one between Berwick and Edinburgh, in 1635, when Charles II. improved upon the horse post of his father, as a means of forwarding the Government despatches between London and Edinburgh. There was previously a system of posts limited to the principal roads, but the work was done but imperfectly, as we find from, the Council records of the period. On the 29th of March, 1631, for instance, the Lords of the Council dealt with the postmaster of Haddington very severely for having lost a packet of letters belonging to His Majesty. From the same case we learn that the postmaster there was required to have fresh horses always ready for the forwarding of such packets as might arrive at his office, just as we have seen in the English arrangements of the period. In 1642, owing to the sending of forces from Scotland to put down the Irish rebellion, it was found that the post arrangements in the south-west of Scotland were defective in the extreme. The Scotch Council thereupon proposed to establish a line of posts between Edinburgh and Portpatrick, and Portpatrick and Carlisle : the English Council, being more immediately concerned in the rebellion, agreed to bear the whole expense. In the Council records of that year, according to Mr. Chambers, there is a list of persons recommended by the Commissioners for appointment on the two lines of road as postmasters, " such persons being the only ones fit for that employment, as being innkeepers and of approved honesty." 2 Seven years afterwards, in 1649, we find the Post-office at Edinburgh was under the care of John Mean, husband of the woman who discharged her stool at the Bishop's head when the service book was introduced into St. Giles's in 1637. Who knows but that this circumstance gave Mean favour in the sight of anti-prelatical Cromwell, who at 1 Kennedy's Annals of Aberdeen, vol. i. p. 262. 2 Domestic Annals of Scotland, vol. ii. p. 142. 64 Her Majesty's Mails. this time wielded the destinies of the entire island? Mean seems to have borne the charges of attending to the office " with- out any reasonable allowance therefor ; " and petitioning the Committee of Estates to that effect, they allowed him to retain k< the eighth penny on all letters sent from Edinburgh to London (no great number), and the fourth penny upon all those coming from London to Edinburgh." In 1654, the postage from Edin- burgh to London and vice versa was lowered to 4d. by order of the Council of the Commonwealth. At the Restoration, the Edinburgh Post-office was controlled by Eobert Mein, under the title of " Sole Keeper of the Letter Office in Edinburgh." Mr. Lang, 1 quoting from the Privy Seal Register, 16601666, says that he had held the office before, i.e. during the reign of the first Charles. Charles II. bestowed the office of Postmaster-General of Scotland upon Patrick Graham, Esq. of Inchbrakie, with the magnificent salary of 5001. Scots yearly, or about 401. sterling per annum ! The place, however, seems at this time to have been a mere sinecure. Many improvements were made under the judicious management of Mr. Mein. In 1667, a post was started between Edinburgh and Aberdeen, to go twice a week " for the timous delivery of letters and receiving returns of the samen" Two years after- wards Inverness got dissatisfied with the want of postal com- munication, when Mein was commissioned to establish a constant footpost between Edinburgh and Inverness, going once a week, " wind and weather serving." 2 Wind and weather serving is an amusing qualification, as pointed out by Mr. Chambers, consider- ing that there were only one ferry of six or seven miles, and another of two miles to cross. About the same time, the Edin- burgh postmaster is useful in another capacity, for in that year the Privy Council grant him a warrant " to put to print and publish one diurnal weekly, for preventing false news which may be invented by evil and disaffected persons." 1 Historical Summary of the Post Office in Scotland, p. 4. 2 The wording of the proclamations for stage coaches, &c. are very various, and sometimes exceedingly amusing. In England, the Divine hand was generally recognised in the formula of " God willing," or, " If God should permit." On the other hand, the Scotch resoluteness of the following could not well be surpassed, where a wagon was announced to leave Edinburgh for Inverness " every Tuesday, God willing, but on Wednesday, whether or no" The Scotch Post-office. 65 John Graham was appointed Postmaster-General for Scotland in 1674, with a salary of 1,0002. Scots, or 83L sterling, per annum. The new chief, it would seem, set about his duty with great spirit. He travelled much in the provinces for the purpose of noticing defects in the postal arrangements, and then remedying them by setting up a number of local posts. In doing all this, however, he " caused himself expenses that his salary would not meet," which is by no means surprising. He ran into debt, and had to take money belonging to his wife to free himself from his liabilities. Graham was released from his troubles by death, when his wife petitioned the Privy Council to have her own again with some success. No one, however, would take the office after Graham, so it was put up to " public roup." In the records of the daily outgoings and incomings of this period we find much to interest and amuse ; the post-boys, from the nature of their business, meeting at times with strange adventures. In 1690, "the post-boy," one Andrew Cockburn, forty-four years old, (most of the "post-boys" being grown men) carrying the letter-bags between Cockburnspath and Had- dington, was assailed by two Jacobites in masks ; one of them, " mounted on a blue grey horse, wearing a stone grey coat, with brown silk buttons ; the other riding on a white horse, having a white English grey cloak coat." They threatened to kill the man if he did not instantly deliver up " the packet, the black box, and the bye bag," and he had no choice but to yield. 1 The post from Edinburgh to London went frequently wrong, and that owing to strange casualties. One which left Edinburgh was never heard of after leaving Berwick. " A most diligent search was made, but neither the boy, the horse, nor the packet, has yet been heard of." It is supposed that he perished in crossing the sands near the Holy Island. On another occasion, the mail coining from London did not reach Edinburgh till late, when it was apologised " that the post-boy, who rode one of the stages, perished in the Kiver Tyne at Newcastle, the mail being taken out of that river." Again, soon afterwards the post-boy (another middle-aged man) "who made the stage between Dunbar and Haddington, being in liquor, fell off. The 1 Domestic Annals of Scotland, vol. iii. p. 32. " The Black Box" con- tained the Government despatches. 66 Her Majesty's Mails. horse was found some distance away, but mail, saddle, and bridle were all gone." Under William and Mary, in 1695, the Scotch Post-office was settled upon a new and firmer basis. It was to a considerable extent amalgamated with the English office, though it was pro- vided that there should be a Postmaster-General for Scotland, appointed by letters patent under the Great Seal of England. Postages were resettled ; all others were prohibited from inter- fering with the carriage of letters, or if convicted, " to be impri- soned for six days for ilk fault, and fined in the sum of six pounds Scots, 'toties quoties.'" Finding that the office of Post- master-General was not held in great repute, the king decided upon making a grant of the whole revenue of the Scotch office, as well as a salary of 300Z. sterling, to Sir Robert Sinclair, of Stevenson, on condition that he would keep up the esta- blishment. 1 In a year from that date Sir Robert gave up the grant as unprofitable and irksome. "We will only further men- tion that the robberies, such as we have just described, increasing, especially in the neighbourhood of the Borders, the two Parliaments of England and Scotland jointly passed Acts in 1698 and 1699 making the robbery or seizure of the public post " punishable with death and confiscation of moveables." Little is known of the earlier postal arrangements of Ireland. Before any legislative enactments were made, it is said, in the reign of Charles I. the letters of the country were transmitted in much the same way as we have already seen they were forwarded in the sister country. The Viceroy of Ireland usually adopted the course common in England when the letters of the king and his council had to be delivered abroad. The subject is seldom mentioned in contemporary records, and we are left to picture in our minds the way in which correspondence would then be transmitted. In the sixteenth century, mounted mes- sengers were employed carrying official letters and despatches to different parts of Ireland. Private noblemen also employed their "intelligencers," as they were then and for some time afterwards called, to carry their letters to other chiefs or their dependents. The Earl of Ormond was captured in 1600, owing to the faithlessness of Tyrone's " intelligencer," who first took 1 Mr. tang's Historical Summary, p. 8. The Irish Post-office. 6 7 his letters to the Earl of Desmond and let him privately read them, and afterwards demurely delivered them according to their addresses. 1 Charles I. ordered that packets should ply weekly between Dublin and Chester, and also between Milford Haven and Waterford, as a means of insuring quick transmission of news and orders between the English Government and the Vice- regal Court at Dublin Castle. We have seen that packets sailed between Holyhead and Dublin, and Liverpool and Dublin, as early as the reign of Elizabeth. Cromwell kept up both lines of packets established by Charles. At the Restoration, only one namely, that between Chester and Dublin was retained, this being applied to the purposes of a general letter post. The postage between London and Dublin was 6d. fresh rates being imposed for towns in the interior of Ireland. A new line of packets was permanently established at the Revolution, to sail between Port Patrick and Donaghadee ; forming an easy and short route between Scotland and the north of Ireland. For many years the mail was conveyed in an open boat, each trip across the narrow channel costing the Post-office a guinea. Subsequently a grant of 200L was made by the English Trea- sury in order that a larger boat might be built for the service. Of the details of the Irish service up to the end of the seventeenth century we have been unable to find much of interest. The annals are so bare and meagre that, after considerable search, we are inclined to doubt, with Mr. Trollope, whether the early Irish Post-office has any annals at all. Certainly all we have found consists of correspondence with the English office, preserved among the records at St. Martin's le Grand. A petition which George Warburton, Esq. the Deputy Postmaster- General for Ireland, addressed to the Lords of the Treasury 2 towards the close of the reign of William III. is replete with interest, and is of much historical importance. From this document we not only get some curious glimpses into the Post-office management at that time, but a graphic picture of the " state of Ireland." It is only necessary to premise that 1 Letters and Despatches relative to the talcing of the Earl of Ortnond, by 0'More,A.D. 1600. 2 Treasury Letter Book, 16911699. F2 68 Her Majesty's Mails. Mr. Warburton was " manager of the Irish office " from 1683 until James II. visited Ireland on his accession to the throne. According to Warburton himself, James, finding him " a strict Protestant," turned him out and put in a Papist ; on King William's visit to Dublin, " after the rout of the Boyne," he restored Warburton, and he with great ability and diligence discharged the duties of his office up to the time of which we are speaking. During his first tenure of office, however, he had contracted a serious amount in arrears still standing against him and he now petitions the Treasury to have it remitted on the following grounds. The postmasters of Ireland were in debt to him, " because they necessarily required to be trusted ; yet the debts would not have amounted to near what they did, but by the failure of Protestant postmasters and others by the oppression of the Papists after the arrival of Tyrconnell at the Government, who turned many of them out of their places, appointing Papists to be entertained (sic), who neither were of ability to make payments, most of whom are either now dead or by the misery of the war made poor and insolvent." This cir- cumstance accounts for one little item in the arrears, but there were other reasons for the discrepancy. The Postmaster-General would be allowed, in the ordinary course of business, certain sums for " State " letters, overtaxings, and insolvent or dead letters ; these sums to be deducted from the gross amount of his bill. "But your petitioner is not able to make out all these particulars by reason of the distraction and confusion of these times. Numbers of insolvent (that is, dead and returned) letters some time before and after the Revolution being very great, for that there were many letters and packets directed to Protestants, which they durst not ovm to ; others were embezzled by the said Popish Government, who, distrusting your petitioner, sometimes before and always after the Revolution, opened the mails at the castle among themselves, taking what letters they pleased in favour of their cause, without any regard to your petitioner being accountable for the same." Well might the Postmaster-General be in arrears under such circumstances ! He then prays the Treasury Lords to take these facts into their consideration ; to think of his losses and his sufferings, and the extraordinary trouble he has had in the execution of his office ; The Irish Post-office* 69 the great danger and hazard which he has outlived, and remit the old arrears. Their lordships send his petition to the Post- masters-General the same shrewd men of whom we have already spoken who readily certify to the correctness of the Irish Deputy's historical statements, though they confess they cannot understand his figures ; " for," say they, " several of the sums are made up only by computation, and it is impossible by letter to receive such satisfaction to several particulars in the said account, as if the postmaster was examined vivd voce" As however Mr. Warburton is still Deputy Postmaster, " and his coming over here would be of ill consequence to His Majesty's service," they suggest that the Auditor-General might send some one over to examine the accounts and report to their lordships. This was done to the satisfaction of the Treasury Lords, and the Postmasters-General, in a final letter, warmly espouse Warburton's case. " The late King James, looking upon him as a man not at all in his interests, thought fit to remove him, whereupon the petitioner intended to have come to England, as several others of the Protestants of that time did, but the present Earl of Rumney having signified to Warburton that he would be better able to serve King William (then Prince of Orange) in Ireland than in England, he remained ;" not altogether, as we have seen, to his peace and comfort. Mr. Warburton's petition was granted. We find abundant proof among the records that Warburton and his subordinates suffered for their Protestantism. Never- theless, from the circumstances under which the Deputy Post- master-General closed his official career, there is room to doubt whether his standard of integrity was a high one. " In 1703," in the words of the English chiefs, "he absconding himself became a bankrupt, to the surprise of all that knew him, he being reputed a man of considerable state, and having been in our employment near thirty-seven years, and several times a member of parliament in that kingdom." It was calculated that he had made away, altogether, with at least 6,OOOL of the public money. Mr. Isaac Manley, the Controller of the English Letter Office, was sent over to report on the state of the office. His report is so lucid and interesting that we regret our want of space to reproduce it here. He found the whole establishmen 70 Her Majesty's Mails. so full of abuses and "inconsistencies," that he was led to propose an entire change of plan and mode of working. The Postmasters-General thought well of his proposals, and asked him to remain till he had set things to rights. Subsequently, but only after the Treasury Lords had agreed to give more salary, Mr. Manley is permanently appointed to the place. In the same year 1703, Elizabeth, Dowager Countess of Thanet, gets a grant from the queen to erect a penny Post-office in Dublin, similar to the one in existence in London. Expeditious Travelling. 71 CHAPTER V. ON OLD ROADS AND SLOW COACHES. IF we seem in this chapter to make a divergence from the stream of postal history, it is only to make passing reference to the tributaries which helped to feed the main stream. The condition of the roads, and no less the modes of travelling, bore a most intimate relationship, at all the points in its history, to the development of the Post-office system and its communi- cations throughout the kingdom. The seventeenth century, as we have seen, was eventful in important postal improvements ; the period was, comparatively speaking, very fruitful also in great changes and improvements in the internal character of the country. No question that the progress of the former depended greatly on the state of the latter. James the First, whatever might be his character in other respects, was inde- fatigable in his exertions to open out the resources of his king- dom. The fathers of civil engineering, such as Vermuyden and Sir Hugh Myddleton, lived during his reign, and both these eminent men were employed under his auspices, either in making roads, draining the fen country, improving the metro- polis, or in some other equally useful scheme. The troubles of the succeeding reign had the effect of frustrating the develop- ment of various schemes of public utility proposed and eagerly sanctioned by James. Under the Commonwealth, and at in- tervals during the two succeeding reigns, many useful improve- ments of no ordinary moment were carried out. In the provinces, though considerable advances had been made during the century, travelling was still exceedingly diffi- cult. In 1640, perhaps the Dover Road, owing to the extent of continental traffic constantly kept up, was the best in England ; yet three or four days were often consumed in the journey between Dover and London. In that year, Queen 7 2 Her Majesty's Mails. Henrietta and household were brought " with expedition " over that short distance in four long days. Many remarkable exam- ples of expeditious travelling are on record, notwithstanding. One case related by Clarendon proves that rapidity of com- munication was comparatively easy when speed was a vital necessity. When Charles I. was living at York, gentlemen couriers engaged to travel the distance between London and York with his letters to and from his Council. " It was a wonderful expedition that was then used," says the royalist historian, " between London and York, when gentlemen under- took the service, as enough were willing to do ; insomuch, as when they despatched a letter on Saturday night about twelve at night, they received always the king's answer, Monday by ten o'clock of the morning." 1 So that these couriers usually accomplished the distance between London and York and back, or near 500 miles, in thirty-four hours. Well might Mr. Forster, who also quotes the account in his Grand Remonstrance, say that it is remarkable to us even in these days. Clarendon also relates that Charles I. lost the services of his English fleet at the breaking out of the Eebellion, partly by the over haste of Mr. Edward Villiers, one of his pages, and partly by the sailing of a portion of the fleet. Villiers, " whose dexterity and dili- gence as a gentleman messenger His Majesty found fit for any trust," had to travel to the Downs with letters to the captains to obey the orders of Sir John Pennington, and not the Earl of Warwick. Another messenger, sent to London with letters revoking the Earl of Northumberland's Commission of Lord High Admiral, was directed "not to make such haste, but that Villiers might be at least as soon at the Downs as he in London." Had this arrangement, the particulars of which are minutely related, not miscarried, Villiers having done his work much too quickly, " it is very probable," says Clarendon, " that the king had been master of many of his ships again." 2 Persons travelling for pleasure or on account of the exigencies of trade and commerce fared but badly from the state of the roads at this period. Short journeys were accomplished in a reasonable time, inasmuch as little entertainment was required. 1 Clarendon's L>fe, vol. i. p. 135. 2 History of the Rebellion, vol. i. p. 524. Difficulties in Travelling. 73 It was different when a long journey was contemplated, seeing that generally the hostelries afforded but sorry accommodation. Whittaker tells us 1 that when the noble family of Clifford required to travel between their houses at Skipton and West- moreland, which they did twice a year, they had sad work of it, though they chose the best seasons for the occasion. The roads by which they journeyed were impracticable for any kind of carriage except a litter for the ladies and the children. How they were entertained on the way, where they slept, and how they fared is matter of exceeding wonderment to their versatile and genial historian, " they must have carried their own beds, as well as provisions " during these annual peregrinations " of this cum- brous train of hardy and ill-accommodated greatness." The roads, indeed, were so bad in many parts of England that it was not at all uncommon, when a family intended to travel, for servants to be sent on beforehand to investigate the country, and report upon the most promising track. In 1665, Cowley invited his friend Dean Sprat, afterwards his biographer and Bishop of Rochester, to visit him at Chertsey. Lest the distance (twenty-two miles) and the attendant difficulties should deter the little man from coming, Cowley showed how he might accomplish the distance quite easily in a couple of days " by sleeping the first night at Hampton Town." The innkeepers of the period were usually the postmasters also, contracting to find requisite horses for the different stages. They were meagrely paid, and their establishments therefore would be meagre likewise ; but they were an interesting class of men, some of them rivalling any Boniface on record. In the works of Taylor, the Water Poet, we have a number of these men described with considerable power, if not grace, of verse. Taylor made a journey into Scotland in the reign of James I. stopping at the hostelries on the road, and paying for his enter- tainment by his exuberant and boisterous wit and anecdote. The title of the account of his journey will of itself sufficiently explain how he managed : The Pennyless Pilgrimage, or the Moneyless Perambulations of John Taylor, alias the King's Majesty's Water Poet. How he travelled on foot from London to Edinburgh, not carrying any money to and fro, 1 History of Craven, p. 309. t 74 Her Majesty's Mails. begging, borrowing, or asking Meat, Drink, or Lodging. 1 He seems to have found nearly all the postmasters and innkeepers unexceptionable and glad of his company, if not for themselves, yet for their other guests ; free with all they had, and never asking payment. " There did my loving friendly host begin To entertain me freely to his inn ; And there my friends, and good associates, Each one to mirth himself accommodates," is the refrain of his song at each goodly town he enters, until he conies to Huntingdon on his way back to London. At the recollection of this town his muse seems to have frozen, for he tells in prose how he " rode to Huntingdon, where he lodged at the postmaster's house, at the sign of the * Crown ' ; his name is Riggs. He came up to my chambers and supped with us (for Taylor picks up a companion on his way back), and very bounti- fully called for three quarts of wine and sugar, and four jugs of beer. He did drink and begin healths like a horse-leech, and swallowed down his cups without feeling, as if he had had the dropsy, or nine pounds of spuiige in his maw. In a word, as he is a post, he drank post, striving by all means to make the reckoning great, or to make us men of great reckoning. But in his reckoning he was tied like a jade, leaving the gentleman who was with me to discharge the terrible shot, or else one of my horses must have lain in pawn for his supercilious calling and unmannerly intrusion." This last incident seems to have gone far to mar the rhymester's pleasure during the journey : still it can scarcely be thought that he did amiss. Many improvements were made in the modes of conveyance during the century. A kind of stage-coach was first used in London about 1608 ; towards the middle of the century, they were gradually adopted in the metropolis and in the better highways around London. In the reign of Charles I. they had increased so much that the king issued a proclamation to the following effect : 2 " The King's Majesty perceiving of late times the great number that are of hackney coaches kept and 1 Taylor's WorJc t 1630. Prom a fine copy in the library of Writers to the Signet in Edinburgh. 2 llymer's Fcedera, torn. xix. p. 721. Stage- Coaches. 7 5 used in the cities of London and Westminster, as also the general and promiscuous use of coaches in and about the said cities, whereby not only a great disturbance grows to His Majesty, his dearest consort the queen, the nobility and others of place and degree in their passage through the streets of the said cities, but the streets themselves so pestered and the pave- ments broken up, as the common passage is thereby hindered and made dangerous." With the advice of his Privy Council he therefore prohibits " all coaches that do not travel at least three miles out of the cities of London and Westminster." All are prohibited from going in the coaches except the owner " keep within the city four able and sufficient horses or geldings for His Majesty's service whenever his occasions shall require," upon pain of his high displeasure and indignation as well as penalties. This prohibition was not enforced after Charles's death. Before the century closed, stage-coaches were placed on three of the principal roads in the kingdom, namely, those between London and York, Chester and Exeter. This was only for the summer season ; " during winter," in the words of Mr. Smiles, " they did not run at all, but were laid up for the season like ships during Arctic frosts." Sometimes the roads were so bad, even in summer, that it was all the horses could do to drag the coach along, the passengers, perforce, having to walk for miles together. With the York coach especially the difficulties were formidable. Not only were the roads bad, but the low Midland Counties were especially liable to floods, when, during their prevalence, it was nothing unusual for passengers to remain at some town en route for days together, until the roads were dry. Ralph Thoresby was more than once in danger of being drowned by these floods. On one occasion he was detained four days at Stamford, and then only ventured to proceed because a convoy of members of Parliament, with the necessary atten- dants and guides, came up on their way to London, and offered him assistance. Thoresby's " Diary " is full of unlucky travelling incidents. " On the Derbyshire roads," says a Mr. Browne, who made a " Tour in Derbyshire" 1662, travellers were in constant fear of their necks, and were frequently compelled to alight and lead their beasts." Public opinion was divided as to the merits of stage-coach 76 Her Majesty's Mails. travelling. When the new threatened altogether to supersede the old mode of travelling on horseback, great opposition mani- fested itself, and the organs of public opinion (the pamphlet) began to revile it. One pamphlet, which we have seen, 1 went so far as to denounce the introduction of stage-coaches as the greatest evil " that had happened of late years in these king- doms ; " " mischievous to the public, prejudicial to trade, and destructive to lands." " Those who travel in these coaches con- tract an idle habit of body ; become weary and listless when they had rode a few miles, and were then unable to travel on horseback, and not able to endure frost, snow, or rain, or to lodge in the fields" Mr. Chamberlayn, however, 2 thought dif- ferently to this anonymous writer, and in all the editions of his well-known book, from 1649 to 1674, never saw fit to alter his text. In speaking of the Post-office he says, that, " besides the excellent arrangement of conveying men and letters on horse- back, there is of late such an admirable commodiousness, both for men and women to travel from London to the principal towns in the country, that the like hath not been known in the world, and that is by stage-coaches, wherein any one may be transported to any place, sheltered from foul weather and foul ways ; free from endamaging of one's health and one's body by hard jogging or over- violent motion ; and this not only at a low price (about a shilling for every five miles) but with such velocity and speed in one hour as that the posts in some foreign countries cannot make in a day." The stage- wagon was used for the conveyance of merchandize. On the principal roads strings of stage-wagons travelled to- gether. Besides these conveyances there were " strings of horses," pack-horses travelling somewhat quicker for the conveyance of light goods or passengers, and generally on narrow paths known as " pack-horse roads." About a mile eastward from Haltwhistle in Northumberland, adjoining the old mail-coach road, and within a hundred yards of the railway, may still be seen one of these pack-horse roads of 200 years ago in a good state of preservation ; thus within a stone's throw of each other we may e Grand Concern of England Explained in several Propc Harl. MSS. vol. viii. pp. 561569. esent Slate of Great Britain. London. 1 The Grand Concern of England Explained in several Proposals to Parlia- ment. 2 Present State of Country Undeveloped. 77 have a good historical illustration of the changes which a couple of centuries have seen in the means of locomotion. The stage- wagon, as a rule, travelled extremely slow except on the road between Liverpool and London ; they seldom changed horses, using the same cattle throughout. The pace, indeed, was so proverbially slow in the North of England, that the publicans of Furness in Lancashire, when they saw the conductors of the travelling merchandize trains appear in sight on the summit of Wrynose Hill, on their way between Whitehaven and Kendal, were jocularly said to begin to brew their beer, always having a stock of good drink manufactured by the time the travellers reached the village ! Whilst communication between different large towns was com- paratively easy travellers passing between London and York in less than a week before the reign of Queen Anne there were towns situated in the same county, in the year 1700, more widely separated for all practical purposes than London and Inverness are at the present day. If a stranger penetrated into some remote districts about this period, his appearance would call forth, as one writer remarks, as much excitement as would the arrival of a white man now in some unknown African village. 1 So it was with Camden in his famous seventeenth century Tour. Camden acknowledges that he approached Lancashire, "that part of the country lying beyond the mountains towards the Western Ocean," from Yorkshire, with a " kind of dread" but trusted to Divine Providence, which, he said, " had gone with him hitherto," to help him in his attempt to learn something of these English barbarians. Country people still knew little except of their narrow district, all but a small circle of territory being like a closed book to them. They still received but few letters. Now and then a necessity would be laid upon some of them to write, and thereupon they would hurry off to secure the services of the country parson, or some one attached to the great house of the neighbourhood, who generally took the request kindly. Almost the only intelligence of general affairs was l Mr. IVancis Mewburn, of Darlington, a name deservedly respected in the neighbourhood where he resides, the father of railway lawyers, whose memory extends to some of the years of last century, kindly informs us that lie can remember such manifestations as these among the dales of Yorkshire where his father resided : a model landlord by all accounts. 7 8 Her Majesty's Mails. communicated by pedlars and packmen, who were accustomed to retail news with their wares. The wandering beggar, who came to the farmer's house craving a supper and a bed, was often welcomed both in England and Scotland as an intelligencer of the rural population. The introduction of newspapers formed quite an era in this respect to the gentlefolk of the country, and to some extent the poorer classes shared in the benefit. The first English newspaper bears the date of 1622. 1 Still earlier than this, the news-letter, copied by the hand, often found its way into the country, and, when well read at the great house of the district, would be sent round among the principal villagers till its contents became diffused throughout the entire community. When any intelligence unusually interesting was received, either in the news-letter or the more modern newspaper, the principal proprietor would sometimes cause his immediate dependents and the villagers to be summoned to his house at once, when he would read to them the principal paragraphs from his porch. The reader of English history cannot comprehend the facts of our past national life if he does not know, or remember, how slowly and imperfectly intelligence of public matters was conveyed during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and what a bearing very difficult to understand in these days such cir- cumstances had upon the facts themselves. We think it is Mr. Froude who first hints that, under these circumstances, a rebellion in one part of the country, which was likely to be popular throughout the entire kingdom, might be quelled before any intimation of the rising reached the adjoining county. Eemote districts waited for weeks and months to learn the most im- l Tiie Weekly Netves, edited by Nathaniel Butter. That was followed in 1663 by the Intelligencer of Roger L'Estrange. The. London Gazette, or as it was called for the first two years, the Oxford Gazette (parliament sitting at Oxford) was started in ] 665. Other papers followed rapidly, till the publishers were at a loss to fill the sheets with. news. In ]695, the Flying Post was established, and its publisher announced, that "if any gentleman has a mind to oblige his country friend with this account of public affairs, he may have it for 2rf. at the Rising Sun in Cornhill, on a sheet of fine paper; half of which being blank, he may thereupon write his own business, or the material news of the day." Again," Dawkes's News Letter "will be done up on good writing- paper, and blank space left, that any gentleman may write his private busi- ness. It will be useful to improve the younger sort in writing a curious hand." The stamp duty commenced in 1712, and taxed every sheet a half- penny, but did not materially lessen the numbers of newspapers. Travelling in Scotland. 7 9 portant intelligence. Lord Macaulay relates that the news of Queen Elizabeth's death, which was known to King James in three days, was not heard of in some parts of Devonshire and Cornwall till the court of her successor had ceased to wear mourning for her. The news of Cromwell having been made Protector only reached Bridgewater nineteen days after the event, when the church bells were set a- ringing. In some parts of Wales the news of the death of King Charles I. was not known for two months after its occurrence. The churches of the Orkneys continued to put up the usual prayers for him for months after he was beheaded ; whilst their descendants did the same kind office for King James long after he had taken up his abode at St. Germains. What, however, can be thought of all this, extraordinary as it may seem in these days of railroads and telegraphs, when it is stated that in a certain village of Lanca- shire the news of the battle of Waterloo never reached the inhabitants until near the first anniversary of that memorable fight, when the church bells rung out rejoicing peals ! Towards the close of the century, travelling improved in Scotland, but it was still attended with great difficulty in some parts. Four miles of one of the best post-roads in Scotland namely, that between Edinburgh and Berwick were described in a contemporary record of about this date as being in so ruinous a state, that passengers were afraid of their lives, " either by their coaches overturning, their horses stumbling, their carts breaking, or their loads casting, and the poor people with burdens on their backs sorely grieved and discouraged ; " more- over, " strangers do often exclaim thereat," as well they might. A traveller in Scotland so late as 1688, commenting on the absence of stage or other coaches on most Scotch roads, says 1 that " this carriage of persons from place to place might be better spared were there opportunities and means for the speedier conveyance of business by letters." He comments on the bad- ness of the roads, and asks that they may be made fit for vehicles. Nothing can better show the difficulties attendant on locomotion of any sort in Scotland, than the fact that an agree- ment was entered into in 1678 to run a coach between Edinburgh and Glasgow to be drawn by six horses, the journey there and 1 A Short Account of Scotland. London, 1702. 80 Her Majesty's Mails. back to be performed in six days. The distance was only forty-four miles in each direction. This undertaking was soon abandoned as unprofitable, though over and above what he could make, the contractor was encouraged by "a subsidy of 200 merks " a year for five years from the Glasgow Corporation. " As the undertaking is arduous," say the magistrates, " we agree to give the said William Hume this sum," on his agreeing to run the coach for the period stated, " whether he have passengers or not, and the burgesses of Glasgow always to have the preference to the coach." The reader who has perused the last few pages will now have some idea of the difficulties which stood in the way of efficient postal communication at the time to which they refer : possibly he may the more clearly comprehend some of the facts of the English history of that eventful century. But, at the same time, he must not suppose that there was any standing still at the Post-office. However much the modes of working, the means of communication, and the slow and unequal manner in which correspondence was distributed, may excite the scorn of the present generation, living in the days of cheap and quick postage, they must, nevertheless, agree with Lord Macaulay in considering that the postal system of the Stuarts was such as might have moved the envy and admiration of the polished nations of antiquity, or even of the contemporaries of our own Shakespeare and Raleigh. 1 In Cornwall, Lincolnshire, some parts of Wales, and amongst the hills and dales of Cumberland, Westmoreland, and Yorkshire, letters were certainly sent but once a week, and not always very regularly then ; but in our larger towns they were delivered two or three times a week. Regularly every summer season the London Gazette contained a notice that letters would be sent daily to Tunbridge Wells, and somewhat subsequently the same privilege was extended to Bath, when that city was filled with pleasure-seekers in summer. There were daily mails to the Downs, two packets constantly sailing from Deal ; two boats sailed between England and France, three to Holland, three to Ireland, and mails were sent at least once a week to all these places from London. " As a masterpiece of all these grand arrangements," says a contributer to the Gentleman's 1 History of England, vol. i. p. 388. Post-office Improvements. 81 Magazine, who describes the Post-office operations of the period, " established by the present Postmaster- General, he hath annexed and appropriated the market-towns so well to the respective postages, that there is no considerable one of them which hath not an easy and certain conveyance for the letters once a week. Further, though the number of letters missive was not at all considerable in our ancestors' days, yet it is now so prodigiously great (and the meanest of people are so beginning to write in con- sequence), that this office produces in money 60,OOOL a year. Besides, letters are forwarded with more expedition, and at less charges, than in any foreign country. A whole sheet of paper goes eighty miles for twopence, two sheets for fourpence, and one ounce of letter for but eightpence, and that in so short a time, by night as well as by day, that every twenty-four hours the post goes 120 miles, and in five days an answer to a letter may be had from a place distant 200 miles from the writer ! " 82 Her Majesty's Mails. CHAPTER VI. THE SETTLEMENT OF THE POST-OFFICE. TEN years after the removal of Docwra from his office in con- nexion with the Penny Post, another rival to the Government department sprang up in the shape of a " Halfpenny Post." The arrangements of the new were nearly identical with those of Docwra's post, except that the charges, instead of a penny and twopence, were to be a halfpenny and penny respectively. The scheme, established at considerable expense by a Mr. Povey, soon attracted the attention of the Post-office authorities ; hence the following advertisement in the Gazette, November, 1709 : " Whereas Charles Povey and divers traders and shopkeepers in and about the city of London, and several persons ringing bells (the invariable accompaniment of letter collecting), about the streets of the said city, have set up, employed, and for some time continued a foot-post for collecting and delivering letters, under the name of the halfpenny carriage of letters, contrary to the known laws of the kingdom and to the great prejudice of Her Majesty's revenue." The advertisement then went on to say that informa- tion had been laid in the Court of Exchequer against Povey and his " ringers of bells," to recover against each of them 100Z. for the setting up of the post, and 51. for the continuance of each offence after this notice. In order to intimidate the offenders, another advertisement appears in the Gazette soon afterwards, to the effect that one Eliz. Locker had been put upon her trial for ringing a hand bell and collecting letters at four different times, to be carried to the General Post-office, without authorization from the authorities ; and that a verdict was given against her for 20/. for the four offences. Meanwhile, Povey's case is not so easily disposed of ; he will listen to reason ; if his post is not suppressed he will try to make some arrangements. With this Mr. Povey. 83 object he addresses the Lords of the Treasury l that if they will let his messengers gather in the letters, " such as pass between man and man," so far as the Penny Post goes, he would " give sufficient security to pay one-tenth part more to the Postmasters- General than what the Penny Post-office ever brought in." " Or otherwise, if they will permit the said Charles Povey to take to farm the Penny Post and the collecting of letters for the General Post-office, that your petitioner would give sufficient security to pay double the revenues of what the Penny Post at any time brought in in clear profit." He further tells their Lordships that he has made the same proposals, entering into full particulars, to the authorities at the Post-office ; and that they had replied to him that they did "not reject any of his proposals, but thought not fit to enter upon any treaty till the question at law was decided." In the meantime, Povey prints publicly an account of his proposals, and part of the correspondence with the authorities, which circumstance does not assist the fulfilment of his designs. The Postmasters-General are asked their opinion on the whole matter, and they enter at length into an account of Povey's undertaking. The account contains some amusing items. When they heard first of this innovation, and before they had threatened him with an action at law through the columns of the Gazette, they wrote to him to desist from his undertaking, or they would cause him to be prosecuted. To this letter Povey returned a reply, that he could not think of being so unjust to himself as to lay down his undertaking at their mere demand ; that his case was not like Mr. Dockwra's ; " neither did we live under such a constitution as he did" He ex- plains his meaning : " When the Penny Post was set up it was an arbitrary Government and bribed judges," but he would now stand his trial and hope for better things. Then the Chiefs tell how they repeated several notices in the Gazette (which we have already given), upon which Povey " printed his case in a public newspaper entitled General BemarJcs" and wherein, "in a ridiculing and insulting manner, he insinuated that if we were concerned in composing the said notice we should be looked upon by all rational men as chargeable with the highest indiscre- tion." Further, waxing still more rude, Povey " affirmed that a i Treasury Letter Book, 17051712. G2 84 Her Majesty's Mails. trial in the Exchequer was all that he wanted, but he feared he should never be provoked to it, since it plainly appeared that if the law had been on our side we would never have published such an advertisement, filled with so many bugbear expressions" They comment upon his proposals ; they refer to the spirit in which he has conducted the correspondence relating thereto ; they tell how in negotiation he has tried to trip them up ; and conclude that he is a dangerous and unsafe man to do business with. " We shall be ready," say they in conclusion, " to give encouragement to any proposal which, duly weighed, may appear to be of advantage to the revenue ; but as Mr. Povey set up his halfpenny carriage, and has continued it for several months after notice given him as aforesaid, and information exhibited against him ; and he having insisted upon what he calls his right, and arraigning a former verdict obtained in the like case, we are humbly of opinion that it is not advisable to enter into any treaty with him upon his proposals till the matter be decided by law." The result of the lawsuit was, that Povey was beaten and cast in costs, and his posts were put down. In 1710, the acts relating to the Post-office were completely remodelled, and the establishment put on an entirely fresh basis. The statutes passed in previous reigns were all repealed, and the statute of Anne c. 10, was substituted in their place ; the latter remaining in force until 1837. The preamble of the Act just mentioned sets forth, that a Post-office for England was established by Charles II. and a Post-office for Scotland by William III., but that it is now desirable since the two countries are united, that the two offices should be united under one head. Also that packet boats have been for some time established between England and the West Indies, and the mainland of North America, and that more might be settled if only proper arrangements were made " at the different places to which the packet boats are assigned." It is further deemed necessary that the existing rates of postage should be altered ; that " with little burthen to the subject some may be increased " and other new rates granted, "which additional and new rates," it is added, " may in some measure enable Her Majesty to carry on and furnish the present war." Suitable powers are also needed for the better collecting of such rates, as well as provision for Monopoly of Letter-carrying, &c. 85 preventing the illegal trade carried on by " private posts, carriers, higlers, watermen, drivers of stage-coaches, and other persons, and other frauds to which the revenue is liable." As these alterations and various improvements cannot be well and properly made without a new Act for the Post-office, the statutes embodied in 12 Charles II. and the statutes referring to the Scotch Post-office passed in the reign of William and Mary, entitled "An Act anent the Post-office," and every article, clause, and thing therein, are now declared repealed, and the statute of 9 Anne c. 10, called "An Act for establishing a General Post-office in all Her Majesty's dominions, and for settling a weekly sum out of the revenue thereof for the service of the war, and other Her Majesty's occasions," is substituted. This Act, which remained in force so long, and may be said to have been the foundation for all subsequent legislation on the subject, deserves special and detailed notice. 1. By its provisions a General Post and Letter-office is established within the City of London, " from whence all letters and packets whatsoever may be with speed and expedition sent into any part of the kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, to North America and the West Indies, or any other of Her Majesty's dominions, or any country or kingdom beyond the seas," and " at which office all returns and answers may be like- wise received." For the better " managing, ordering, collecting, and improving the revenue," and also for the better " computing and settling the rates of letters according to distance, a chief office is established in Edinburgh, one in Dublin, one at New York, and other chief offices in convenient places in Her Majesty's colonies of America, and one in the islands of the West Indies, called the Leeward Islands." 2. The whole of these chief offices shall be " under the control of an officer who shall be appointed by the Queen's Majesty, her heirs and successors, to be made and constituted by letters patent under the Great Seal, by the name and style of Her Majesty's Postmaster-General" " The Postmaster-General shall appoint deputies for the chief offices in the places named above, and he, they, and their servants and agents, and no other person or persons whatsoever, shall from time to time, and at all times, have the receiving, taking up, ordering, despatching, sending 86 Her Majesty's Mails. post with all speed, carrying and delivering of all letters and packets whatsoever." The only exceptions to this clause must be * (a) When common known carriers bear letters concerning the goods which they are conveying, and which letters are delivered with the goods without any further hire or reward, or other profit or advantage. (6) When merchants or master-owners of ships send letters in ships concerning the cargoes of such ships, and delivered with them under the self-same circumstances. (c) Letters concerning commissions or the returns thereof, affidavits, writs, process or proceeding, or returns thereof, issuing out of any court of justice. ( 1843, p. ] 33. Mr. Hill's Pamphlet. 1 69 its Importance and Practicability. This, the first edition, was circulated privately among the principal members of the Legis- lature and official men ; the second edition, published two months afterwards, being the first given to the world. The pamphlet, of which we must here attempt to give some account, created an immediate sensation ; most people were struck with the novelty of its views ; the more thoughtful saw at once the evident care and attention that had been bestowed on the subject, and the general soundness of the conclusions arrived at. In the mercantile world especially, Mr. Hill's proposals were at once understood, eagerly adopted, and spread rapidly. Mr. Hill may be said to have started with the fact to which we have already adverted in the previous chapter, namely, that the Post-office was not progressing as it ought, and like other great interests ; that its revenue from 1815 to 1835 had remained quite stationary, though there was at the latter period an addi- tional population of six millions, and though the increase in trade and commerce had been proportionate with the increase of population. Again, the increase in the ratio of stage-coach travellers made the case still more clear. Had the duties on postage increased in the same proportion as the duty on stage- coach travelling, the sum of two millions sterling would have been added to the postal revenue each year. Though a smart Quarterly Reviewer answered this argument by saying that the more men travelled, the less need was there for writing, it is easy to demonstrate the falsity of the position from present experi- ence, and to show, that had the old principles of postage been true, the Post-office revenue should have advanced as rapidly as the analogous duty on stage-coaches. Mr. Hill then went on to show that the principle of high rates of postage was an erroneous one ; that it affected in a most material way other branches of revenue ; he maintained the counter principle (which has made rapid progress since his time), that reducing the taxes on certain goods does not necessarily occasion a reduction in the public revenue, but that the reduction would often lead to increased consumption of the articles in question. As an illustration, he gave the case of the malt-tax, which reduced 28 per cent, had only resulted in a diminution of revenue to the extent of 24 per cent. He adduced other cases of remission of taxation, and also 1 7 o Her Majesty's Mails. one or two cases where postage rates had been reduced with the same results. From the data which Mr. Hill was enabled to gather for accounts of any sort were not kept so accurately at the Post-office then as now, and there were no accounts of the number of inland letters he estimated the number of letters passing through the Post-office ; and we may remark, that considering the meagre- ness of the statistical information at his disposal, his estimates were made up with wonderful accuracy and ingenuity, and required little subsequent alteration. Having got the number of letters and the total amount of revenue received from them, he made a rough calculation, which, though rough, came very near the mark, that the average charge per letter was 6%d. He then tried to ascertain the expenses of management. This cost he divided into two heads, the primary and secondary dis- tribution, and showed that the cost of receiving and delivering the letters, and also the cost of transit, took two-thirds of the total cost of the management of the Post-office. Of this sum, the amount which had to do with the distance letters were con- veyed, Mr. Hill calculated at 144,000?. out of the total postal expenditure of 700,000?. Applying to this smaller sum the estimated number of letters deducting franks and taking into account the greater weight of newspapers he gave the apparent average cost of conveying each letter as less than one-tenth of a penny. The conclusion to which he came from this calculation of the average cost of transit was inevitable, and that was, that if the charge must be made proportionate (except, forsooth, it could be shown how the postage of one tenth or one thirty-sixth of a penny could be collected) it must clearly be uniform, and for the sake of argument, and not considering the charge as a tax, or as a, tax whose end was drawing near, any packet of an equal weight might be sent thoughout the length and breadth of the country at precisely the same rate. The justice and propriety of a uniform rate was further shown, but in a smaller degree, by the fact that the relative cost of transmission of letters under the old system was not always dependent on the distance the mails were carried. Thus, the Edinburgh mail, the longest and most important of all, cost 51. for each journey. Calculating the proportionate weight of bags, Mr. Hilfs Principal Arguments. 171 letters, and newspapers, Mr. Hill 1 arrived at the absolute cost of carrying a newspaper of an average weight of 1^ oz. at one sixth of a penny, and that of a letter of an average weight of J oz. at one thirty-sixth of a penny. These sums being the full cost for the whole distance, Mr. Hill assumed, fairly enough, that the same rating would do for any place on the road. It was admitted on all hands, that the chief labour was expended in making up, opening, and delivering the mails ; therefore the fact whether it was carried one mile or a hundred made comparatively little difference in the expenditure of the office. The expenses and trouble being much the same, perhaps even less at Edinburgh than at some intermediate point, why should the charges be so different ? But the case could be made still stronger. The mail for Louth, containing as it did comparatively few letters, cost the Post-office authorities, as the simple expense of transit, one penny-farthing per letter. Thus, an Edinburgh letter, costing the Post-office an infinitesimal fraction of a farthing, was charged one shilling and three-halfpence to the public, while a letter for Louth, costing the Post-office fifty times as much, was charged to the public at the rate of tenpence ! Nothing was clearer, therefore, that if Mr. Hill's propositions were opposed, and his opponents did not advocate the payment according to the actual cost of transit, those who were adverse to them must fall into the absurdity of recognising as just an arrangement which charged the highest price for the cheapest business ! At first sight it looked extravagant, that persons residing at Penzance or near the Giant's Causeway, at Watford or Wick, should pay equal postage for their letters. The intrinsic value of the con- veyance of a letter, it must be admitted, is a very different thing from its cost, the value being exactly equal to the time, trouble, and expense saved to the correspondents, of which, per- haps, the only measure appeared to be the actual distance. Looked at more narrowly, however, in the clear light of Mr. Hill's investigations, it became obvious that it was really " a nearer approximation to perfect justice " 2 to allow distant places to feel the benefits of the measure, passing over the little 1 Post-office Reform, p. 14, third edition. 2 Our Exemplars, Poor and Rich, edited by Matthew Davenport Hill. London, 185], p. 317. 172 Her Majesty's Mails. inequalities to which it might give rise, while all might pay such a sum as would cover the expenses in each and every case. 1 Having laid his foundation on this broad basis, he went on to show that the high rates of postage were so excessive (not onlv varied according to distance, but doubled and tripled if there were enclosures, and charged with fourfold postage if the letter exceeded an ounce in weight), as greatly to diminish, where they did not absolutely prevent, correspondence. Not only so, but the high rate created an illicit traffic, involving all classes of the country in the meshes of a systematically clandestine trade. Nor was this all. The expenses of the department might be much reduced by simplifications in the various processes. The existing system resulted in a complicated system of accounts, involving great waste of time, as well as offering inducements to fraud. The daily work of exposing letters to a strong light, in order to see the number of its enclosures, also offered a constant temptation to the violation of the first duty of the officers of the 1 The Westminster Review, July, 1860, p. 78, in an able but exceedingly ex parte article on " The Post-office Monopoly," doubts whether Mr. Hill's system is a near approximation to perfect justice, being, in its opinion, " by no means the snmmnm bonum of letter- rates." " A charge of one penny for the carriage of all letters of a certain weight within the United Kingdom, irrespective of distance, is eminently arbitrary." ..." No one in London who has written^ two letters, one to a friend residing in the same town as himself, and another to one in Edinburgh, can have failed, in affixing the stamps to them, to observe the unfairness of charging the same sum for carrying the one 400 yards and the other 400 miles, when the cost of transmission" must in the one case be so much more than in the other." These quotations plainly show that Sir .Rowland Hill's early arguments have been lost upon the reviewer. If that gentleman demonstrated one thing more plainly than another, it was that the absolute cost of the transmission of each letter was so infinitesimally small, that if charged according to that cost, the postage could not be collected. Besides, it is not certain that the one letter would cost the Post-office more than the other. Moreover, to the sender the value of the conveyance of the local letter was equal to its cost, or he would have forwarded it by other means. No doubt a strong argument might be based on some such grounds as these, as to the justice of a lower rate for letters posted and delivered in the same town. Such a measure might be supported on Sir Rowland Hill's own principles; but the apparent anomaly is surely no argument against a State monopoly of letter-carrying. It is only fair to add though at the same time it is also curious that in a paper in the present number of the Westminster (January, 1865) on " Railways," Sir Rowland Hill meets with cordial praise and recog- nition as a true reformer; t'ie principle of penny postage is de facto cora- ni"nded; and the success of the measure is adduced as an argument for the formation of a gigantic system of monopoly in railways 1 Charged by Weight. 173 State in respect to the sanctity of correspondence. If, instead of charging letters according to the number of sheets or scraps of paper, a weight were fixed, below which, whatever the contents of the letters, a certain rate were charged, much trouble would be saved to the office, not to speak of the principle being more just. Then, again, a great loss of time was experienced in the mode of collecting the postage from door to door as the letters were delivered, each letter-carrier being detained on the average two minutes at every house ; and not only so, but check-clerks and check-accounts had to be kept at the Post-office of the amounts thus sent out. Mr. Hill went on to show how a great economization of labour might be effected by some system of prepayment by means of stamps or stamped covers, which could be easily managed provided the postage rates were made uniform ; while, if the public would construct letter-boxes in their doors, the existing staff might easily distribute four or five times the number of letters they were then able to deliver. Mr. Hill, in his able pamphlet, exhausted the subject. All the facts to which we have just adverted, and their results on the public revenue, shine out here as clear as noonday. By a variety of striking arguments, he urged upon the nation a trial of his plans begged for an unobstructed and cheap circulation of letters, expressing his most deliberate conviction that the Post- office, a rendered feeble and inefficient by erroneous financial arrangements," was " capable of performing a distinguished part in the great work of national education," that it might and would become " a new and powerful engine of civilization," and thus be made a benefaction and blessing to mankind. He left the following proposals to the deliberate judgment of the nation : 1 . A large diminution in the rates of postage, say even to one penny per letter weighing not more than half an ounce. 2. Increased speed in the delivery of letters. 3. More frequent opportunities for the despatch of letters. And 4. Simplification in the operations of the Post-office, with the object of economy in the management. The grand, yet simple foundation of the new scheme, was, of course, the proposal that the rate of postage should be low and uniform, and charged according to weight. No wonder that the scheme, of which, in our own order, we have 174 Her Majesty's Mails, just attempted an outline, roused feelings of delight and appro- bation from the people at large throughout the length and breadth of the land. Still less is it a matter of surprise that the Government and the Post-office authorities, in charge of the revenue, should stand aghast at the prospect of being called upon to sanction what they considered so suicidal a policy. We are not left in doubt as to what the authorities thought of the scheme when it was first proposed. Three months after the publication of the pamphlet, Lord Lichfield, the Postmaster- General, speaking as to its practicability, described the proposal in the House of Lords, 1 " of all the wild and visionary schemes which I have ever heard of, it is the most extravagant." Six months afterwards he is still willing to endorse all he said in June : " Since I made those observations I have given the subject considerable attention, and I remain even still more firmly of the same opinion." 2 Colonel Maberly spoke even more decidedly : he thought it " a most preposterous plan, utterly unsupported by facts, resting entirely on assumptions." The revenue was first thought of. Lord Lichfield told the House of Lords that no man regretted more than himself that the plan could not be followed ; it would so materially affect the revenue. The Duke of Richmond, always entitled to respect when he spoke of Post-office matters, thought " a reduction of postage was greatly needed," but he could not see his way clear, " on the score of public revenue, to urge the adoption of the plan as it stood." 3 Lord Brougham, with that clear-sighted vision and quick comprehension for which he has always been so remark- able, took the opportunity to say that nothing he had heard from either noble duke or noble earl had in the least degree shaken his opinion as to the utility and feasibility of Mr. Hill's plan. Nor did the Ex-Lord Chancellor ever waver for a moment or relax in his exertions to second the labours of the reformer. The Post-office authorities at first argued that the letters would not increase at all in the proportion stated, and that therefore the primary element to a successful issue was more than doubtful. Mr. Godby, of the Irish Post-office, said 1 Hansard, vol. xxxvii. June, 1837. 2 Ihid. vol. xxxix. Nov. 1837. 3 Ibid.??. 376373. Conflicting Opinions. 175 he did not think " any human being living would ever see such an increase of letters as would make up the loss " by the pro- posed reductions. Even, however, supposing the letters do increase as Mr. Hill estimates, they argued, what will be the certain result if that increase should be realized ? *' The mails," said Lord Lichfield on a subsequent occasion in the House, " will have to carry twelve times as much in weight, and there- fore the charge for transmission, instead of 100,OOOL as now, must be twelve times that amount. The walls of the Post-office would burst ; the whole area in which the building stands would not be large enough to receive the clerks and letters." Nor were the Post-office authorities the only opposers of the scheme ; at first few members of the Legislature took the matter up warmly. Many well-known names were ranked in decided opposition, some contending that the plans, among otljer draw- backs, would not only absorb the existing revenue, but would have to be supported by a ruinous subsidy from the Exchequer. But a valiant and courageous few in such a just and reasonable reform were a host in themselves. Some of the most intelligent statesmen of the day, including men like Lord Brougham and the late Lord Ashburton, were inclined to go even so far as to advocate the sacrifice of revenue altogether believing, as the latter expressed it, that the postage of letters ought not to be made the subject of a tax at all 1 rather than not have the reform. An immense number of thoughtful people believed, however (and Mr. Hill seems to have shared in this belief), that any diminution which should result at first from the adoption of the plans would only be temporary, and should be regarded as an outlay, which, in the course of years, would yield enormous profits. " Suppose even an average yearly loss of a million for ten years," said an able writer in the Edinburgh Review, 2 " it is but half what the country has paid for the abolition of slavery, without the possibility of any money return. Treat the deficit as an outlay of capital. Even if the hope of ultimate profit should altogether fail, let us recur to some other tax . . . any tax but this, certain that none can operate so fatally on all the other 1 " This is the worst of our taxes," said Lord Ashburton; "you might as well tax words spoken on the Royal Exchange." 2 Ldinburgh Review, vol. Ixx. p. 545. 1 7 6 Her Majesty's Mails. sources of revenue. Letters are the primordia rerum of the commercial world. To tax them at all is condemned by those who are best acquainted with the operations of finance." Nor was Mr. Hill to be cried down. He had an opportunity of speaking again on the publication of the third edition of his pamphlet. He admitted, as we have before said, that his plans, if carried out, would result in a diminution of revenue for a few years to come. On the reliable data which he had collected, he calculated that this decrease might extend, at first, to as much as 300,000?. per annum ; but that the scheme would pay in the long run, and pay handsomely, he had no manner of doubt. Again, the letters would certainly increase ; if the flood-gates of correspondence were thus opened, it was not reasonable to suppose that the stream would not flow freely and fully : yt still the increase would not be so enormous as to swamp all the existing appliances, nor would it be less than what would be requisite to show that this movement was one ardently wished for by all classes of the population. One of the first results of the publication of Mr. Hill's pamphlet, was the formation of the " Mercantile Committee " in London in 1837. This committee composed of a number of the most influential merchants and bankers in London, 1 with the late Mr. Bates, of the house of Baring & Co. for chairman was called into existence through the manifested opposition to a reform which was seen at once by them to be sound and reasonable. Their work, to which many of them devoted a great deal of time, was to spread a knowledge of the new plans throughout the community. A thousand pounds were sub- scribed at once for the purpose of distributing the necessary information, and for the general purposes of the agitation. Like all other large organizations for any kind of reform, the " Mer- cantile Committee " had its organ in the Post Circular, which was published for the sole purpose of conveying correct and important information relative to the progress of the reform, and awakening the general public to a proper sense of its importance. 1 The following gentlemen were on the committee : Mr. G. Moffat, now M.P. for Honiton; Mr. James Pattison, M.P.; Mr. Jones Loyd (now Lord Overstone) ; Mr. D. Colvin, Mr. Lindsay Cole, Mr. W. Ellis, Mr. Gladstanes, Mr. Larpent, Mr. Wilkinson, and Mr. Lestock Wilson. Public opinion on the Measure. 177 On the 9th of May, 1837, 1 Mr. Wallace proposed a Select Committee to go into the question raised by Mr. Hill, and this he did in an able speech. Lord John Russell opposed the motion, hoping " the member for Greenock would withdraw it, to allow the House to proceed with a Bill which was necessary for the peace of Ireland." Mr. T. Duncombe advised the hon. member to postpone his motion, but to persist in it at another time. Mr. Wallace then withdrew it ; but the ball had com- menced rolling, and there was now no stopping it. Whatever might be said in Parliament, public opinion in the country was most decided on the question, that even if the success of the new scheme was insufficient to cover the charges of the establish- ment, it ought by all means to be carried out. Scarcely ever was public sympathy so soon and so universally excited in any matter. The progress of the question of post reform, was in this, and some other respects, very remarkable, and shows in a strong light how long a kind of extortion may be borne quietly, and then what may be accomplished by prompt and conjoint action. Before Mr. Hill's pamphlet appeared, no complaints reached the Legislature of the high rates of postage. During the year in which it did appear, five petitions reached the Houses of Lords and Commons, praying that its author's scheme might, at least, be considered. In the next year 320, and in the first half of the year 1839 no fewer than 830, petitions were pre- sented in favour of the measure. During the agitation it is calculated that over 2,000 petitions reached St. Stephen's, in- cluding 400 from town councils and other public bodies. In November, 1837, the Duke of Richmond presented a petition from Scotland in favour of the scheme, and expressed the opinion we have already given. On the same occasion, Lord Brougham presented one from London merchants, and took the opportunity to make one of his able speeches. A month after- wards he presented another from the Lord Mayor and Corpora- tion, and said that they had the capacity beyond most men of examining the particulars and principles of such a plan. They had given their opinion unanimously for Mr. Hill. Lord Radnor presented a petition at the same time from the principal London booksellers. Lord Ashburtoii presented one from bankers, 1 Hansard, vol. xl. May, 1857. N 178 Her Majesty's Mails. solicitors, and men of science, signed by the leading spirits of the metropolis. In reply to the able speeches which accom- panied these petitions, the Ministers satisfied themselves by speaking generally and favourably of the subject. They inti- mated that the matter was under their consideration, and that they intended to deal with it themselves. This they did, according to Miss Martineau, "by proposing little schemes, and alterations, and devices of their own, which only proved that they were courageous in one direction, if not in another." * So great and irresistible, however, became the pressure from without that the Ministry left off temporizing, and indicated that they would agree to an inquiry. On the 23d of November, Mr. Spring Rice, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, proposed a Committee to inquire into the present rates or modes of charging postage, with a view to such reduction thereof as may be made without injury to the revenue; and for this purpose " to examine especially into the mode recommended of charging and collecting postage in a pamphlet by Mr. Rowland Hill." The Committee consisted of Lords Lowther and Seymour, Sir Thomas Freemantle, Hon. C. P. Villiers, Messrs. Poulett Thomson, Warburton; Raikes Currie, M. J. O'Connell, T. Thorneley, Chalmers, J. Pease, Mahony, Parker, and G. W. Wood. Mr. Wallace, of Kelly, was appointed chairman on the first day, after which the sittings were adjourned till after the Christmas holidays. It was noticed that most of the members nominated by the Chan- cellor of the Exchequer were favourable to the Government, all but two Lord Lowther and Sir Thomas Freemantle having voted for the Ballot. The Tories, however, did not grumble, as on this subject the Government was conservative enough. The Committee sat altogether sixty-three days, concluding their deliberations in August, 1838. They examined all the principal officers of the Post-office, and eighty-three independent witnesses representing all the principal interests of the country. Thus, Dr. Birkbeck, Dr. Lardner, and others, testified to the injury the heavy postage-rates inflicted on literature ; Mr. Charles Knight, Mr. Whittaker, Mr. J. W. Parker spoke with more especial reference to the bookselling and publishing trade ; Dr. Gregory and Dr. Munk spoke of a cheaper rate of postage 1 History of the Thirty Tears' Peace, vol. ii. p. 429. The Committee 0/1838. . 179 being a desideratum with the medical profession, especially instancing the case of vaccination ; and some of the members of the Mercantile Committee, and others, like Mr. Cobden, represented the different trading and commercial interests in- volved. The Post-office authorities were particularly urged to send their principal officers, in order that all their known objections should be thoroughly and carefully canvassed. At first many of the members of the Committee showed an evident bias against the scheme, but much of this was removed as the evidence slowly accumulated, and especially when it became clearly apparent that Mr. Hill's facts and statistics .were borne out by his evidence, and that this evidence could not be gain- sayed by the Post-office. It were a long story to tell how the feeling in favour of the measure grew day by day. Suffice it to say that the final triumph was achieved by dint of great perse- verance and activity on the part of Mr. Hill, the favourable witnesses, and the favourable members of the Committee, and by the out-balancing force and incontestable power of Mr. Hill's figures. The examination itself was by no means ex parte, but seems to have been carried on with great firmness as well as great ability. Those members of the Committee who were par- ticularly pledged to the protection of the revenue, as well as Lords Lowther and Seymour who were intimate with Post- office proceedings from having sat on the Commission appear to have missed no opportunity of sifting the opinions and the statements of each witness ; but in spite of all this, and the adverse attitude of nearly all the Post-office officials, Mr. Hill bore up in " that most unpleasant of all positions," as George Stephenson naively expressed his own experience of a parlia- mentary witness-box, with great tact and firmness, fully proving the soundness and the strength of the conclusions of his pamphlet upon which judgment had now to be passed. A great subject of dispute between Mr. Hill and the Post- office was the increase in the number of letters necessary to the success of the scheme. In opposition to the views of official men, 1 Mr. Hill held that a fivefold increase in the number of 1 Lord Lichfield thought it would require a twelvefold increase, " and I maintain," said he, " that our calculations are more likely to be right than his." Report, 282. N2 180 Her Majesty's Mails. letters would suffice to preserve the existing gross revenue. As regarded the means of conveyance, he showed that the stage- coaches, &c. already in existence could carry twenty-seven times the number of letters they had ever yet done ; and this state- ment passed without dispute. The evidence was clear and most convincing as to the vast amount of contraband letters daily conveyed ; and no less certainly was it shown that if Mr. Hill's schemes were carried out, the temptation to evasion of postage would be at once abolished, inasmuch as there could not then be sufficient inducement for the resorting to illegal mediums. A Glasgow merchant stated that he knew five manu- facturers in that city whose correspondence was transmitted illegally in the following proportions, viz. (1) three to one ; (2) eighteen to one ; (3) sixteen to one ; (4) eight to one ; and (5) fifteen to one. Manchester merchants among whom was Mr. Cobden stated that they had no doubt that four-fifths of the letters written in that town did not pass through the Post- office. No member of the Committee had any idea of the extent to which the illicit conveyance of letters was carried. A carrier in Scotland was examined, and confessed to having carried sixty letters daily, on the average, for a number of years ; knew other carriers who conveyed, on an average, five hundred daily. He assured the Committee that the smuggling was alone done to save the postage. " There might be cases when it was more convenient, or done to save time, but the great object was cheapness." The labouring classes, especially, had no other reason. " They avail themselves of every possible opportunity for getting their letters conveyed cheaply or free." In his opinion, the practice could not be put a stop to until the Post- office authorities followed the example that was set them in putting down illicit distillation in Scotland. " I would reduce the duty, and that would put an end to it, by bringing it down to the expense of conveyance by carriers and others." Mr. John Keid an extensive bookseller and publisher in Glasgow sent and received, illicitly, about fifty letters or circulars daily. " I was not caught," he said, "till I had sent twenty thousand letters, &c. otherwise than through the post." He constantly sent his letters by carriers ; he also sent and received letters for himself and friends, inclosed in his booksellers' parcels. Any Letter Smuggling. 1 8 1 customer might have his letters so sent, by simply asking the favour. It also came out in evidence, that twelve walking- carriers were engaged exclusively in conveying letters between Birmingham and Walsall and the district, a penny being charged for each letter. The most curious modes of procedure, and the oddest expedients 1 for escaping postage, were exhibited during the sitting of the Committee. One, largely patronized by mer- cantile houses, consisted in having a number of circulars printed on one large sheet, when, on its arrival at a certain town, a mutual friend or agent would cut it up, and either post or deliver the parts. Nay, matters had been brought to such a state, that a leading journal, commenting on the matter of illicit letter-conveyance just previous to the sittings of the Committee, went the length of saying that, "fortunately for trade and com- merce, the operation of the Government monopoly is counter- acted by the clandestine conveyance of letters." . . . "The means of evasion are so obvious and frequent, and the power o. prevention so ineffectual, that the post has become only the extraordinary, instead of the usual, channel for the conveyance 1 Mr. Hill related some of these in his pamphlet. Thus, at page 91, we read : " Some years ago, when it was the practice to write the name of a Member of Parliament for the purpose of franking a newspaper, a friend of mine, previous to starting on a tour into Scotland, arranged with his family a plan of informing them of his progress and state of health, without putting them to the expense of postage. It was managed thus: he carried with him a number of old newspapers, one of which he put into the post daily. The postmark, with the date, showed his progress; and the state of his health was evinced by the selection of the name, from a list previously agreed upon, with which the newspaper was franked. ' Sir Francis Burdett,' I recollect, denoted vigorous health." Better known is the anecdote of a postal adventure of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, already adverted to at the commencement of the present chapter. The story is told originally, in Mr. Hill's pamphlet also: Once, on the poet's visits to the Lake district, he halted at the door of a way- side inn at the moment when the rural postman was delivering a letter to the barmaid of the place. Upon receiving it she turned it over and over in her hand, and then asked the postage of it. The postman demanded a shilling. Sighing deeply, however, the girl handed the letter back, saying she was too poor to pay the required sum. The poet at once offered to pay the postage, and in spite of some resistance on the part of the girl, which he deemed quite natural, did so. The messenger had scarcely left the place, when the young barmaid confessed that she had learnt all she was likely to learn from the letter ; that she had only been practising a preconceived trick : she and her brother having agreed that a few hieroglyphics on the back of the letter should tell her all she wanted to know, whilst the letter would contain no writing. " We are so poor," she added, "that we have invented this manner of corresponding and franking our letters." 1 82 Her Majesty's Mails. of letters." Notwithstanding this testimony, the evidence of the Post-office officials on this and the other heads of inquiry betrayed an unusual degree of official jealousy of in- terference, and a very large amount of official partiality. Thus, Colonel Maberly argued, that if the postage of letters were reduced to a penny it would not stop smuggling : in which case they might as well have smuggling under the one system as the other. But his zeal on this point overcame his discretion. " For," he continued, " 1,000 letters might still be sent as a coach-parcel for seven shillings, whereas the Post-office charge for them would be four guineas." But the gallant colonel seems altogether to have forgotten that the item of delivery is, after all, the chief item in all Post-office charges. A few more examples of the statements of the authorities may here be given. Thus, the Secretary said, relative to an increase of letters, that " the poor were not disposed to write letters " (10,851). He thought that, during the first year, the letters would not double, even if franking were not abolished (2,949). " If the postage be reduced to one penny, I think the revenue would not recover itself for forty or fifty years." Lord Lichfield said that he had ascertained that each letter then cost "within the smallest fraction of twopence-halfpenny " (2,795). With regard to the principle of the uniform rate, Colonel Maberly thought it might be desirable, but impracticable " (10,939). " Most excellent for foreign postage, but impracticable for inland letters" (3,019). He also said that the public would object to pay in advance whatever the rate (10,932-3). The Committee next had their attention called to still more important facts, viz. that the number of letters conveyed illegally bore no proportion to the number which were not written at all on account of the high rates of postage. On the poor the Post- office charges pressed grievously, and there seemed no other course open to them than that, if their letters could not be received without the payment of exorbitant rates, they must lie in the hands of the authorities. It is only necessary to compare the income of a labouring man with his pressing wants to see that it was idle to suppose that he would apply his little surplus to the enjoyment of post-letters other than in cases of life and death. The Committee were absolutely flooded with instances Finding of the Committee. 183 iii which the Post-office charges seriously interfered with the wants and reasonable enjoyments of the poor. On the general question involved, nearly all the witnesses, of whatever rank or grade, evidenced that the public, to an enormous extent, were deterred from writing letters and sending communications, which otherwise, under a cheaper tariff, they would write and send. That this part of the case was proved may be concluded from the language of the Committee themselves : " The multitude of transactions which, owing to the high rates of postage, are pre- vented from being done, or which, if done, are not announced, is quite astonishing. Bills for moderate amounts are not drawn ; small orders for goods are not given or received ; remittances of money are not acknowledged ; the expediting of goods by sea and land, and the sailing or arrival of ships not advised ; printers do not send their proofs ; the country attorney delays writing to his London agent, the commercial traveller to his principal, the town-banker to his agent in the country. In all these, and many other cases, regularity and punctuality is neglected in attempts to save the expenses of exorbitant rates of postage." On all the other parts of the scheme, and on the scheme itself as a whole, the Committee spoke no less decisively. Generally and briefly, they considered that Mr. Hill's strange and startling facts had been brought out in evidence. They gave their opinion that the rates of postage were so high as materially to interfere with and prejudice trade and commerce ; that the trading and commercial classes had sought, and successfully, illicit means of evading the payment of these heavy charges, and that all classes, for the self-same reason, corresponded free of postage when possible ; that the rate of postage exceeded the cost of the business in a manifold proportion ; and that, alto- gether, the existing state of things acted most prejudicially to commerce and to the social habits and moral condition of the people. They conclude, therefore, 1. That the only remedy is a reduction of the rates, the more frequent despatch of letters, and additional deliveries. 2. That the extension of railways makes these changes urgently necessary. 3. That a moderate reduction in the rates would occasion loss, 1 84 Her Majesty's Mails. without diminishing the peculiar evils of the present state of things, or giving rise to much increased correspondence ; and, 4. That the principle of a low, uniform rate is just in itself, and when combined with prepayment and collection by stamp, would be exceedingly convenient and highly satisfactory to the public. So far, their finding, point by point, was in favour of Mr. Hill's scheme. They reported further that, in their opinion, the establishment of a penny rate would not, after a temporary depression, result in any ultimate loss to the revenue. As, however, the terms of their appointment precluded them from recommending any plan which involved an immediate loss, they restricted themselves to suggesting a uniform twopenny rate. The Commissioners of Post-office Inquiry consisting of Lord Seymour, Lord Duncannon, and Mr. Labouchere who were charged with an "inquiry into the management of the Post- office," had already concluded their sittings, and had decided upon recommending Mr. Hill's plan as far as it concerned the " twopenny post " department ; that being the only branch then under consideration. "We propose," say they, and the words are significant, " that the distinction in the rates and districts, which now applies to letters delivered in the twopenny and threepenny post, shall not in any way affect correspondence transmitted under stamped covers ; and that any letter not exceeding half an ounce shall be conveyed free within the metro- polis, and the district to which the town and country deliveries extend, if inclosed in an envelope bearing a penny stamp" With these important recommendations in its favour, the scheme was submitted to Parliament. After some little delay the Government took the aaaatter into its hands, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Baring (who had succeeded Mr. Spring Rice on his being sent to the House of Lords as Lord Monteagle), and the present Sir Francis Thornhill Baring, had the project of a uniform rate of postage embodied in a Bill which passed in the session of 1839. This Act, which was affirmed by a majority of 102 members, conferred temporarily the necessary powers on the Lords of the Treasury. The opposition in the House of Commons was feeble, as many of Literature on the subject. 185 the Conservative party did not oppose. Sir Robert Peel's chief argument against the change was that it would necessitate a resort to a direct tax on income at least this was the only objection avowed. In order, however, to strengthen the hands of Government, now that the question had been narrowed in most men's minds to the single one of revenue, the majority pledged themselves to vote for some substituted tax, if, upon experience, any substitute should be needed. 1 In our attempt to give a continuous account of the proceedings and the result of the Committee's deliberations, we may seem to have neglected to notice much that went on outside the doors of the Committee-room in favour of the measure. At the risk of disturbing the chronology of our account, we must go back over some of the ground for twelve months past. The Mercantile Committee was actively engaged during all the time in spreading information of the progress of the measure, and rousing the public to a due sense of its importance. Not only was the Post Circular kept circulating, but hand-bills, fly-sheets, pictorial illustrations, some of which turned the arguments and statements of opponents to ridicule, were distributed in great numbers. Even the dramatic form of representation was resorted to. " A Report of a Scene at Windsor Castle respecting the Uniform Penny Postage," was presented in the form of a short drama. In one part, the scene being laid in the Council Chamber of Windsor Castle, the queen is made to say aloud : " Mothers pawning their clothes to pay the postage of a child's letters ! Every subject studying how to evade the postage without caring for the law ! .... (To Lord Melbourne.) I trust, rny Lord, you have commanded the attendance of the Postmaster-General and Mr. Rowland Hill, as I directed, in order that I may hear the reasons of both about this universal penny postage plan, which appears to me likely to remove all these great evils." After Rowland Hill has detailed his plan, and Lord Lichfield has abused it, and Lord Melbourne has confessed his ignorance of. both sides of the question, the queen takes the reformer's side very warmly, seeming to understand the minutest details. After much amusing matter, wherein the arguments for reform are well touched up, the Postmaster-General says that he feels 1 Hansard, vol. xlix. 1839. 1 86 Her Majesty's Mails. uneasy, and wishes to be relieved from the audience. After he has retired, the queen sums up as follows : " What I have read, and this interview, have convinced me that a uniform penny post is most advisable. I am sure it would confer a great boon on the poorer classes of my subjects, and would be the greatest benefit to religion, to morals, to general knowledge, and to trade." After commanding Lord Mel- bourne to attend to it, she concludes : " Mr. Hill, the nation will owe you a large debt of gratitude, which I am sure it will not be unwilling to repay." A cheap edition of this jeu d'esprit was published by the London Committee, and circulated by thousands. It was so plain and pungent, and the form given to it proved so attractive, that it brought the question home to the masses of the nation in a remarkable manner. This cheap edition finished as follows: " Mothers and fathers that wish to hear from their absent children ; " Friends who are parted that wish to write to each other ; " Farmers that wish to hear of the best market ; " Tradesmen that wish to receive money quickly and cheaply ; " Mechanics and labourers that wish to learn where good work and high wages are to be had ; " Support your queen and the report of the House of Commons with your petitions for a uniform penny post." Nor were there wanting other helpers who did good service in a more staid way for the movement. Mr. W. H. Ashurst, in an able pamphlet, 1 went over the entire ground up to that time, strongly advocating a thorough trial of the scheme. Lord Brougham, in the House of Lords, urgently hoped that the opposition of the Post-office authorities might not be allowed to have any unfair weight with their Lordships or the country. He told how the Post-office authorities had before resisted reason- able reform. In a most amusing speech he told how Mr. Palmer had been laughed at " by the oldest and ablest officers of the Post-office " at the time he proposed his great improvements ; yet how, " notwithstanding the * absolute contempt,' the ' scornful indignation ' to which he was subjected, when Palmer laid his reckless hand on the pace of the Post-office horses, the revenue was 150,000?. though it had since fallen to 1,150,0002. !" He begged their Lordships' pardons for giving them such speci- 1 Facts and Reasons in support of Mr. R. HilFs flan for a Universal Penny Postage. Hooper, 1838. Preparing for the Measure. 187 rnens of the wisdom of their ancestors, but they were useful in elucidating the kind of objections people would bring to any kind of innovations. He would hold them out as a warning in the present case. No one out of Parliament, at any rate, who read Mr. Hill's pamphlet attentively, or who studied the various phases through which the agitation carried the measure, but was convinced of its practicability ; and a careful perusal of the evidence collected by the Committee of the House of Commons was sufficient to determine any waverer as to the necessity of its being adopted. Still there were serious misgivings as to the steps which the Melbourne administration must soon announce. It was generally believed that the measure would be brought in shorn of some of its most important clauses ; few thought it possible that it would be fully tried. Petitions were presented to Parliament praying that the plan should be tried as a whole, and that there should be no change except one based on the main principles of Mr. Hill's scheme. Lord Kadnor spoke the general belief when he expressed his fear that the Government were only about to try " as much of that scheme as would ensure its failure." There were some few objections to Mr. Hill's plan, and some difficulties about it ; but the nation at large had decided for it, and some of the principal men in the country, not favourable to the then existing Ministry, decided for it also. The Duke of Wellington was " disposed to admit, that that which was called Mr. R. Hill's plan was, if it was adopted as it was proposed, of all the plans that which was most likely to be successful." 1 The Duke of Richmond, waiving all objections, pressed upon the Ministers, that if they gave their sanction to any uniform plan, it should be to Mr. Hill's, " for that alone, and not the twopenny postage, seems to me to give hope of ultimate success." 2 On the 12th of November, 1839, the Lords of the Treasury set many doubts at rest by issuing a minute, under the authority of the Act before referred to, reducing the postage of all inland letters to the uniform rate of fourpence. This arrangement, which is said to have been made with the full concurrence of Mr. Hill, was resorted to as a means of accustoming the officers to the uniform rate and system of charging by weight ; but this 1 Select Committee on Postage, 1843. 2 Ibid. 1 88 Her Majesty's Mails. fact cannot sufficiently have been made known to the country, inasmuch as great and general dissatisfaction was expressed with it, and we find it openly avowed in many respectable organs of public opinion at that time, that the Government meant to establish permanently a fourpenny rate of postage. The reformer, however, has placed the question beyond doubt by stating that this arrangement was only temporary and suggested by him for the purpose above-stated. On the 10th of January, another minute was issued, ordering the adoption of a uniform penny rate. On the 10th of August, the Treasury had its minute confirmed by the Statute 3 and 4 Viet. chap. 96. The result of the agitation of only two years was hailed with intense satisfaction by the great bulk of the British population, and it happily forms a pleasant page in our national history. The reform then inaugurated has since spread with such amazing rapidity, that its growth and progress may be said to belong not solely to English history, but to the history of civilization itself. The entire race is now ready to attest the benefit and blessing bestowed upon it by the measure of 1840. From that time to this the feeling of gratitude has shown itself in different ways. One early expression of this feeling may well find a place here. Just after the Act was passed, the late Hartley Coleridge being in the company of a literary gentleman, turned the conversation on Mr. Hill and his scheme. On the spur of the moment the young poet said he thought he could write something about it, and on being supplied with the necessary materials, threw off the following sonnet which is not at all known : " They say that spirits can hy thought impart Whate'er they know, and are, or wish to he ; But man, dependent on the ministry Of his own brain, has authorized an art To memorize the meanings of his heart. The love we cannot hear, we yet may see, May spell the words the strange orthography That might make Lindley or old Dilworth start : Taxes, we know, are very wicked things They search our pockets and retrench our pleasures But 'tis the best of Ministerial measures That imps the feathers of young Cupid's wings, Father and mother, sister, brother, son, Husband and wife, pronounce one benison." Opinions on the Measure. 189 The most important organs of public opinion were loud in their praises of the Government measure, and of the men who had taken the most prominent part in the agitation. There were some exceptions, as a matter of course, and there were not wanting predictions as to the certain failure of the new plans. It is now very amusing and instructive to turn to some of the unfavourable expressions of opinion elicited by the passing of the Act. True to its traditional policy, the Quarterly Review fulminated and denounced, but only to find before much time had elapsed that its sage, prophetic averments were falsified by subsequent events. Mr. John Wilson Croker, in the Quarterly, tried hard to extinguish the reformer, but Mr. Hill was made of stuff too stern for him. In October, 1839, this writer stigmatized the measure as " one of the most inconsiderate jumps in the dark ever made by that very inconsiderate assembly." It " is distinguished by weakness and rashness ;" it "is neither necessary nor wise." But the judgment of posterity is in this, as in so many other things Croker attempted, sadly against the reviewer. The Quarterly Review, though the most virulent, was certainly not the only organ that abused the penny postage scheme. Other important serials deprecated parts of the measure, as, for instance, prepayment of letters. Some writers looked askance at the scheme. Few writers of any note publicly expressed complete disagreement with the new plans. Eaikes, in his Diary, with that perverted vision which only sees the little evils of any great social improvement, wrote : " The Chancellor of the Exchequer in bringing forward his Budget, has proposed that the postage on a single letter should be reduced to one penny. This will increase the number of idle scribblers ; be of little benefit to the lower classes, who seldom have occasion to write ; and is likely only to advantage the commercial houses and bankers, who can well afford to pay the postage." The late Mr. McCullagh was led from some consideration or other in one of his works published at the period 1 to speak of " the miserable quackery of a uniform penny postage rate," although he was one of the first to sign the petition from the men of science and men of letters in favour of the measure ! But " hereby hangs a tale," which we might have told, but dt mortuis nil, nisi bonum. 1 Commercial Dictionary t p. 990. 1 90 Her Majesty's Mails. The Whigs seem to have treated Mr. Hill with justice and fairness after the measure to which they had yielded had passed. A Treasury appointment was given to him to enable him to work out his plans, or, in the wording of the engagement, " to assist in carrying into effect the penny postage." This appointment resulted in varying success until the Tory party came into power in 1841. After this, things went worse with him ; Mr. Goulbourn, the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, was politely unfriendly ; and the result was, that in the summer of 1842, after about three years of this superintending service, he was politely bowed out of the Treasury on the plea that his work was finished ; that his nursling had found its legs, and might now be taken into the peculiar care of the Post-office authorities themselves. Thus again was the progress of Post-office improvements interrupted by leaving them in the hands of unwilling authorities "prophets," as one writer has said in reference to this very case, "..who had the direct means of assisting in the fulfilment of their own predictions." Mr. Hill entreated the new Premier to let him remain, or in some way to exercise a supervision over his system, at any pecuniary sacrifice to himself, but his entreaties were unavailing. He must watch his scheme from a distance. 1 Speaking of the hindrance which Mr. Hill met with in official circles, we are reminded of a pamphlet which appeared shortly after this period, during Mr. Hill's exile, evidently from some Post-office official, On the Administration of the Post-office. 2 1 "Lord Lowther," so Mr. Hill was told, "was a steady friend to post reform, and was well acquainted with the department." Without doubt the new Postmaster-General's feelings, however ridiculous, were consulted in this matter. Mr. Hill's anxiety for the general scheme, and for subsequent minor proposals, was quite natural. When refused the Treasury appointment, he asked to be taken into the Post-office, there to see his plans worked out. Lord Lowther, when he comes to speak on the proposal, somewhat indignantly asks the Treasury Lords if " the character and fortunes of the thousands employed in the Post-Office are to be placed at the mercy of an individual who confesses that he is ' not very familiar with the details of the methods now practised.' " "It is easy to imagine," continued Lord Lowther, "the damage the community might sustain from his tampering with a vast machine interwoven witli all the details of Government, and necessary to the daily habits and events of this great empire ! " The matter is not one of " detail," but of "principle; " if their Lordship's want this or that carried into execu- tion, they have only to say so, and Lord Lowther will see that it is done, " though it may be in opposition to my own opinion." * Hatchard and Son. 1844. Opinions on the Measure. 191 This precious pamphlet has been long consigned to well-merited oblivion, and we only rescue it for a moment from the limbo of all worthless things to show the feeling which then actuated some of those in office. The reader can scarcely fail to be reminded of the criticism which Mr. Palmer's scheme called forth from the leading spirits of the Post-office of his day. The pamphlet, illogical where it is not abusive, laid it down as a principle that "the Post-office is not under any obligation to convey the correspondence of the country." Again, that "the Post-office is a Government monopoly for the benefit of the public revenue, and exists for the sole purpose of profit." Then there are praises for the old, and abuses for the new regime. " The celerity, the certainty, the security with which so vast a machine executed such an infinite complexity of details were truly admirable ! " On the other hand, " whilst mesmerism and the other attractive novelties of the day have had their hour, the quackery of penny postage ought surely now to follow the same course." Mr. Hill comes in for a good share of detraction. His figures are " garbled extracts ; " some of his statements " beneath criticism ; " whilst his complaints are judged " morti- fied vanities ! " He is further " kindly counselled " to leave " his pet scheme to the practical men of the Post-office." In the following flowery language he is recommended to " behold it (his project) as a spectator from the shore, viewing his little bark in safety, navigated by those who are practically best acquainted with the chart, wind, and waves." Mr. Hill's popularity outside the Post-office contrasted favour- ably with the estimation in which he was held inside. The entire community had become impressed with the value of his measures, and the important services he had rendered. Spurred on to exertions by the treatment he had received at the hands of an Administration, which, to use the fine expression of Lord Halifax in reference to another public benefactor, " refused to supply the oil for a lamp which gave so much light," a public subscription was opened throughout the country, which, joined in by all classes, was quickly represented by a handsome sum. The money, which amounted to over thirteen thousand pounds, and which was only considered an expression of national grati- tude, and by no means a full requital for his services, was 192 Her Majesty's Mails. presented to him at a public banquet got up in London under the auspices of the " Mercantile Committee." In an address which accompanied the testimonial, Mr. Hill's measure of reform was pronounced one " which had opened the blessings of a free correspondence to the teacher of religion, the man of science and literature, the merchant and trader, and the whole British nation especially the poorest and most defenceless portions of it a measure which is the greatest boon conferred in modern times on all the social interests of the civilized world." Mr. Hill's bearing on the occasion in question is described as most modest and unassuming. He expressed his gratitude for the national testimonial in few but telling phrases. He delicately alluded to his proscription from office, regretting that he could not watch the progress of his measure narrowly, and pointed out improvements which were still necessary to give complete efficiency to his reform. Mr. Hill gave ample credit to those who had sustained him in his efforts to carry his plans through Parliament, and especially named Messrs. Wallace and War- burton, members of the Special Committee of 1838, Mr. Baring, the ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Lords Ashburton and Brougham. We shall have frequent occasion, as we advance, to mention Mr. Hill's name in connexion with Post-office history during the past twenty years ; but we may here notice the remaining par- ticulars of Mr. Hill's personal history. On the restoration of the Whigs to power in 1846, Mr. Hill was brought back into office, or rather first placed in office at St. Martin's-le-Grand, as secre- tary to the Postmaster-General, the present Marquis of Clanri- carde. In 1854, on Colonel Maberly's removal to the Audit Office, Mr. Hill attained the deserved honour of Secretary to the Post-office, under the late Lord Canning the highest fixed appointment in the department, and second only in responsibility to that of Postmaster-General. In 1860 Mr. Hill was further honoured with the approval of his sovereign, and few will question it, if we say it was a worthy exercise of the royal prerogative, when he was called to receive the dignity of Knight Commander of the Bath. The arduous exertions, extending over a quarter of a century, and the increasing duties of the Secretary of the Post-office Sir Rowland Hill. 1 93 have, within the last few years, begun to tell upon the physical system of Sir Kowland Hill, and have more than once caused him to absent himself from the post which he has made so honourable and responsible. During the autumn of 1863 he obtained leave of absence from active duty for six months his place being filled by Mr. Tilley, the senior assistant secretary of the Post-office a step which was generally understood to be preparatory to his resignation, should no improvement be manifest in his health. His retirement was announced during March, 1864, when he left the Post-office, and passed " not into obscurity, but into deserved repose." May he be long spared to enjoy the rest and quiet which he has so well earned, and the gratitude and sympathy which must be universally felt for him. His early work, that would have been Herculean, even if it had not been assailed by foes without and foes within, must have caused him immense labour of hand and labour of brain ; the carrying out also of many important subsequent measures, which may be said to have followed as necessary corollaries of his great reform, must have occasioned him an amount of bodily and mental toil and excitement of which the " roll of common men " have neither experience nor conception. Not to speak of his services to commerce, Sir Rowland Hill, more than any living individual, has succeeded in drawing close the domestic ties of the nation, and extending in all and in every way the best interests of social life. Mr. Ashurst, in 1838, wrote in his pamphlet, to which we have referred previously, " Mr. Hill has rendered immense service to the public, and will ultimately be considered as the benefactor of his country." To a great extent this prediction has already been verified, although opinions may very probably differ as to the form and extent which the public gratitude has taken up to this time. The Executive Government, in a Treasury minute, dated March llth, 1864, in just and highly appreciative language unusually complimentary for that class of official documents signified its resolution to grant Sir Rowland Hill his full salary as a retiring allowance. After recounting his valuable services, and stating that his case was a fitting one for special arrange- ment, it thus proceeds : " Under the circumstances, it may justly be averred that my Lords are dealing on the present o 194 Her Majesty's Mails. occasion with the case not merely of a meritorious public servant, but of a benefactor of his race ; and that his fitting reward is to be found not in this or that amount of pension, but in the grate- ful recollection of his country. But my Lords discharge the portion of duty which belongs to them with cordial satisfaction, in according to Sir Rowland Hill for life his full salary of 2,OOOZ. per annum." Many of the organs of public opinion, and several members of the Legislature thought, however, that " the grateful recollection of his country," though an object the attainment of which would ever be one of the highest ambition, was scarcely substantial enough, especially when it was considered that Sir Rowland Hill's career had been very chequered, and that in pursuance of his favourite project, he had sacrificed prospects which would, in all human probability, have raised him to greater affluence. When therefore Lord Palmerston gave notice of moving that the pension should be continued to Lady Hill, in the event of her surviving her husband, as another instalment of what was due to him, the Premier was urged by an influential deputation to take into consideration the desirability of making a Parliamentary grant of a certain sum of money in place of this deferred pension. Accordingly, in May, 1864, Lord Palmer- ston brought down to the House a message from the Queen, pro- posing a grant of 20,OOOZ. The veteran Premier, in proposing this "honorarium" which the vast majority of Englishmen would like to have seen doubled spoke in eloquent terms in praise of Sir Kowland Hill's invention ; its simplicity ; the amazing stimulus it had given to the commerce arid industry of the nation ; and its inestimable value in the cultivation of the domestic affections, especially among the humbler classes. One voice alone was raised against the modest grant that of the arch economist, the ubiquitous Mr. Williams. The representa- tives of the important constituencies of the city of London, Liverpool, Manchester, and Leeds, instantly repudiated this parsimony. Sir Francis Baring bore his valuable testimony to the good humour, calm sense, and intelligence with which Sir Rowland Hill encountered the difficulties raised against his plan ; while Mr. Neate, the member for Oxford (who was private secretary to Sir Francis Baring, when the latter was Chancellor of the Exchequer), very justly reminded the House of the atten- Sir Rowland HilVs Retirement. 195 tion, the time, and the labour which Sir Francis himself had bestowed upon the measure. It only remains to add that the inhabitants of Birmingham and Liverpool have cordially recognised, in different ways, Sir Rowland Hill's services ; that since his retirement, the Society of Arts has presented him with the first gold " Albert medal," recently established in memory of the late President, the Prince Consort, to be given " for distinguished merit in promoting arts, manufactures, or commerce ; " and that the University of Oxford has conferred upon him the honorary degree of Doctor of Common Law. It is pleasant to read, in connexion with the last honour, how even the wayward and boisterous undergraduates forsook their frolics for one moment, to receive with becoming warmth the man who had helped them so largely to increase their social enjoyments. One thing we take leave to think Sir Rowland Hill might have been spared on his retirement, 1 and we cannot conclude this chapter without alluding to it. We refer to the endeavour made in one or two influential quarters to partition the honour of suggesting the uniform plan of penny postage between the late Secretary and some others, who, with the exception of Mr. Wallace, of Kelly, have never been definitely named. Now, we maintain that if a clear and practicable way be not shown to the realization of a plan for any comprehensive change, the mere 1 Another little, matter which ought not to be passed over unnoticed was the attitude of the leaders of the Conservative party. We say leaders, because the great body of Conservatives are no less grateful than others for a blessing which all share alike. Nor is it possible that either leaders or followers can wish for a return to the old order of things. During the discussions relating to Sir Rowland Hill, but one Conservative member raised his voice in the otherwise general acclaim. We are led to notice this not on Sir R. Hill's behalf alone, but in the general interest of civil servants, who like him deserve well of their country, whose claims must come from time to time before the Legislature, and whose merits must now more than ever meet with their proper and unstinted reward. That the services of disfranchised official men should be viewed through a party medium is unfair to them. Apart from any political bias for we are required to eschew politics we think it is too evident that the recollection of the foils and counterfoils of 1888, 1839, and 1842 1843, had much to do with this apathy and coldness. Afterwards, one of the leading opposition organs, taking its cue from the vis inertia in high places, must need speak of Sir R. Hill as " one of the most favoured of public servants," " few men have had such a prosperous career" ! and more ad nauseam. On the whole, while his merits and claims have been promptly and cordially, if not fully, recognised by the one great section of the community, it is well that he has not been left to the tender mercies of the other. o 2 196 Her Majesty's Mails. suggestion of the idea amounts to little. As a matter of fact, however, there is absolutely no evidence forthcoming of any one having as much as offered the theory of a uniform low rate of postage and payment by weight, before the publication of the pamphlet on Post Reform; and really no one will pretend to dispute that the great merit of carrying out the penny post measure belongs to Sir Rowland Hill. Of course that measure could not have so succeeded without the assistance of others, and we are not left in doubt as to how much of the success is owing to the cordial co-operation, since 1845, of the principal officers of the Post-office. In the paper published on his retirement, Sir K. Hill speaks of their services in language which conveys the highest compliment " Men whose ability would do credit to any service, and whose zeal could not be greater if their object were private instead of public benefit." This language Lord Stanley of Alderley almost repeats in the Tenth Report on the Post-office, just published ; when, in speaking with regret of the great loss the public has sustained in the retirement of Sir Rowland Hill, and bearing evidence to the zeal and ability which he displayed in the office of Secretary (page 40), he also referred to the many able men at the Post-office, who have laboured long and diligently in the service, and "who, for the most part, could have but little hope of making themselves known beyond the department." Anticipations Realized. 197 CHAPTER XT. EARLY RESULTS OF THE PENNY-POSTAGE SCHEME. THERE are two aspects in which to contemplate the measure of penny-post reform. The first relates to its social, moral, and commercial results ; the second views it in its financial relation- ship. When the system had been in operation two years, it was found that the success of the scheme- in its first aspect had far surpassed the most sanguine expectations ever formed of it by any of its advocates. As a financial measure, it cannot be said to have succeeded originally. In this latter respect it disappointed even Mr. Hill, who, though he never mentioned the date when the revenue derivable from the Post-office would be recovered under the new system, was very emphatic in his assurances that the loss during the first year would not exceed 300,OOOZ. Calculating upon a fourfold increase of letters, in his pamphlet 1 he estimated the net revenue, after deducting for franks and newspapers, in round numbers at 1,300,000?. ; a sum only 300,000?. less than the revenue of 1837. We do not say that Mr. Hill originally calculated on recovering the absolute net revenue by the collection of postage; but any deficiency which might continue, after the scheme was fairly tried, he expected to see supplied, eventually, by increased produc- tiveness in other departments of the revenue, which would be benefited by the stimulus given to commerce by improved communication. 2 Before the Parliamentary Committee he was equally explicit: 3 when asked if, on a fivefold increase, there would still be a deficiency on the net revenue, he answered in the affirmative, to the extent of, he should think, 300,000?. He again, however, stated his conviction that the deficit would be 1 Post-office Reform, p. 26. 2 Results of the New Postal Arrangements, read before the Statistical Society of London, 1841. a Second Report, p. 365. 1 98 Her Majesty's Mails. made up by the general improvement of trade and commerce in the country. It is true that events proved that the falling-off' in the gross revenue was considerably in excess of all the calcu- lations which had been made : but even under this head, much may be said ; and in considering the different results of penny postage, we expect to be able to point out that the scheme had intrinsic qualities in it, which, under proper treatment, must have made it in all respects a success. Mr. Hill met another Parliamentary Committee in 1843, when his recommendations in their principal features, at any rate had been acted upon for three years. In the course of this further investigation to the circumstances attending which we shall presently allude much information relative to the carrying out of the measure, its successes, and failures, was elicited. It was shown beyond all dispute, that the scheme had almost entirely prevented breaches of the law, and that if any illicit correspondence was carried on, it was simply and purely in matters where the question of speed was involved ; that the evils, amounting to social prohibitions, so prevalent before the change, had been, for the most part, removed. Commercial transactions, relating even to very small amounts, were now managed through the post. Small orders were constantly transmitted ; the business of the Money-order office having increased almost twenty-fold first, from the reduction of postage in 1840, and then from the reduction of the fees in November of the same year. " These orders are generally acknowledged. Printers send their proofs without hesitation ; 1 the commercial traveller writes regularly to his principal, and is enabled for the first time to advise his customers of his approach ; private individuals and public institutions distribute widely their circulars and their accounts of proceedings to every part of the land." Better than any account that we might give of the reception of this boon by the country, and the social and commercial advantages which were 1 The reader of such books as Cowper's Life and Letters, and Moore's Correspondence, will find that the means of obtaining franks, or carriage for their manuscripts or proofs, gave the poets frequent uneasiness, and lost them much time. So with mauy needy literary men, in what Professor de Morgan somewhat absurdly calls the " Prerowlandian days." The Professor himself gives an instance of an author sending up some dry manuscripts to him, under cover to a member of Parliament, expressing a hope, we think, that the repre- sentative would feel some interest in the subject. Increase of Correspondence. 199 immediately seen to follow from it, we may here give some account of the correspondence which flowed in upon Mr. Hill between 18401842, and which he read to the Select Com- mittee appointed to try the merits of his scheme. Ten times the weight of evidence, and far more striking instances of the advantages of the penny-post scheme might now be adduced ; but it must be remembered that we are here speaking merely of first results, and when the scheme had been but three years in operation. Numbers of tradesmen wrote to say how their business had increased within the three years. One large merchant now sent the whole of his invoices by post ; another increased the number of his "prices current" by 10,000 per annum. Messrs. Pickford and Co. the carriers, despatched by post eight times the number of letters posted in 1839 ; whilst the letters, had they been liable to be charged as per single sheet, would have numbered 720,000 in 1842 from this one firm, against 30,000 letters in 1839. In this case we have an exemplification of the correctness of the argument upon which Mr. Hill built his scheme ; for the increase of money actually paid for postage was at the rate of 33 per cent. Mr. Charles Knight, the London publisher, said the penny-postage stimulated every branch of his trade, and brought the country booksellers into almost daily communication with the London houses. Mr. Bagster, the pub- lisher of a Polyglot Bible in twenty-four languages, stated to Mr. Hill that the revision which he was just giving to his work as it was passing through the press would, on the old system, have cost him 1,500. in postage alone, and that the Bible could not have been printed but for the penny post. Secretaries of different benevolent and literary societies wrote to say how their machinery had been improved ; conductors of educational establishments, how people were everywhere learning to write for the first time in order to enjoy the benefits of a free corre- spondence, and how night-classes for teaching writing to adults were springing up in all large towns for the same object. Mr. Stokes, the honorary secretary of the Parker Society composed of the principal Church dignitaries and some intelligent laymen which has done so much for ecclesiastical literature by reprinting the works of the early English reformers, stated that the Society could never have come into existence but for the penny postage. 200 Her Majesty's Mails. One of the principal advocates for the repeal of the Corn Laws subsequently gave it as his opinion, that their objects were achieved two years earlier than otherwise would have been the case, owing to the introduction of cheap postage. After a lapse of twenty years, many more useful societies might be mentioned of which the same could be said. An interesting letter from the late Professor Henslow, the then Eector of Hitcham in Suffolk, may be given, as it contains a pretty accurate estimate of the social advantages accruing to the masses. The pro- fessor had, consequent upon the change at the Post-office, arranged a scheme of co-operation for advancing among the landed interest of the county the progress of agricultural science. After stating that the mere suggestion of such a thing had involved him in a correspondence which he could not have sus- tained if it had not been for the penny postage, he goes on to say : " To the importance of the penny postage to those who cultivate science, I can bear most unequivocal testimony, as I am continually receiving and transmitting a variety of specimens by post. Among them, you will laugh to hear that I have received three living carnivorous slugs, which arrived safely in a pill-box ! That the penny postage is an important addition to the comforts of the poor labourer, I can also testify. From my residence in a neighbourhood where scarcely any labourers can read, much less write, I am often employed by them as an amanuensis, and have frequently heard them express their satisfaction at the facility they enjoy of now corresponding with distant relatives. The rising generation are learning to write, and a most material addition to the circulation of letters may soon be expected. Of the vast domestic comfort which the penny postage has added to homes like my own, I need say nothing more." Miss Harriet Martineau bore testimony to the social advantages of the measure in the neighbourhood where she resided. A celebrated writer of the period gives it as his opinion, that "the penny-post scheme was a much wiser and more effective measure than the Prussian system of education" just then established. "By the reduction of the postage on letters," adds he, 1 " the use and advantage of education has been brought home to the common man (for it no longer costs him a 1 Laing's Notes of a Traveller. Anticipations Realized. 201 day's pay to communicate with his family). A State machinery of schoolmasters on the Prussian system would cost far more than the sacrifice of revenue by the reduction of postage. This measure will be the great historical distinction of the reign of Victoria. Every mother in the kingdom who has children earning their bread at a distance, lays her head on the pillow at night with a feeling of gratitude for this blessing." Almost all now living, who shared the benefits of the scheme at this early date, could probably relate some anecdote which circumstances had brought to their knowledge as to the operation of penny postage on the poorer classes especially. Thus, the then Inspector of Prisons for Scotland, visiting the Shetland Islands in 1842, writes: 1 "The Zetlanders are delighted with cheap postage. The postmaster told me that the increase in the number of letters is astonishing. . . . Another gentleman who is well acquainted with the people told me, that although the desire of parents to keep their offspring at home is unusually strong in Zetland, yet that cheap postage has had the effect of reconciling families to the temporary absence of their members, and has thus opened to the islanders the labour-market of the mainland." An American writer, 2 in an admirable pamphlet on cheap postage, says : " The people of England expend now as much money as they did under the old system ; but the advantage is, they get more service for their money, and it gives a spring to business, trade, science, literature, philanthropy, social affection, and all plans of public utility." Joseph Hume, writing to Mr. Bancroft, then American minister at the Court of St. James's, 1848, says : " I am not aware of any reform, amongst the many which I have promoted during the past forty years, that has had, and will have, better results towards the improvement of the country socially, morally, and politically." And Mr. Hill him- self, in addressing the Statistical Society in May, 1841, 3 made a statement which was neither an idle nor a vain boast, when he assured them that " the postman has now to make long rounds through humble districts, where, heretofore, his knock was rarely heard." We have yet the second, or financial aspect of the measure to 1 Eraser's Magazine, September, 1862. 2 Mr. Joshua Leavitt. 3 Page 96. 2O2 Her Majesty's Mails. consider. In two years a tolerably correct idea might be formed as to the results of the scheme financially ; but it would certainly not be fair to attempt any full estimate of such a thorough reform within a more circumscribed period. Not that this was not attempted. Colonel Maberly discovered, at the end of the first week, that Mr. Hill's plan had failed, at any rate, as a ques- tion of revenue. No doubt the wish was father to the thought. He not only thought so, however, but proceeded to take timely action and shield himself and his congeners against some probable future attack. In his own words, he charged " the officials to take care that no obstacle was thrown in the way of the scheme, so as to give a colour to the allegation" which the prophetic colonel was only too sure would be made " that its failure was owing to the unwillingness of the authorities to carry it fairly into execution." 1 In the first year of penny postage, notwithstanding all the confident prophecies to the contrary from those who might have been supposed to have had means of judging, the net proceeds of the Post-office were between four and five hundred thousand pounds, whilst the number of letters actually sent was more than doubled. Against a million and a half yearly revenue of the previous year, there certainly appeared an enormous deficit ; but till all other arguments were exhausted, it ought not to have been considered either evidence or proof of the failure of cheap postage. In the first instance, the Post-office authorities said the scheme would not pay its expenses : a year sufficed to prove their mistake. It was then said that the revenue sacrificed would never be recovered, and accidental circumstances, of which we shall presently speak, favoured for a time this view : the argument, however, was based on erroneous views, as subse- quent events have sufficiently shown. Bad as things appeared, there were, nevertheless, many significant signs, at the end of three years, that the gross revenue under the old would soon be reached under the new system, and even prospects that the past net revenue might still be recoverable. Both these anticipations have now been entirely realized. With a tenfold nay, in many cases, a hundredfold gain to different classes of the community with the Post-office supplying more situations by thousands i Select Committee on Postage, 1843, p. 246. Partial Measures. 203 than under the ancien regime, the old gross revenue was passed in 1850-1, and the net revenue was reached in 1863. More- over, every complaint under this head has long since been silenced. Many considerations went to hinder the early growth of the revenue ; and it is to some of these considerations that we must now turn for a moment. It is of primary importance that the reader should remember that Mr. Hill, in his pamphlet and elsewhere, expressed a decided opinion that the maintenance of the Post-office revenue depended upon the carrying out of all his plans. 1 In a speech which he delivered at Wolverhampton, September 7th, 1839, he said: " The mere reduction in the rates of postage will, of course, greatly increase the number of letters ; but much will still depend on the extent to which the facilities for despatching letters are improved by a careful employment of the many economical and speedy modes of conveyance which now exist, and by a solicitous attention to all the minute ramifications of distribution. If, on the one hand, due attention is paid to the increasing demands of the public for the more frequent and more speedy despatch of letters, and, on the other hand, pains are taken to keep down the cost of management, though some temporary loss of revenue will arise, I see no reason to fear that the loss will be either great or permanent." Mr. Hill's proposals, it will be remembered, were embraced under four principal heads. The first, a uniform and low rate of postage, was fully carried out ; but it was the only part of the measure which was realized at this time. The second, increased speed in the delivery of letters ; and the third, consisting of provisions for greater facility in the despatch of letters, were not attempted, or, if attempted, only in the slightest degree. With regard to the simplifications of the operations of the Post-office, which formed the fourth great item, little or nothing was done, though that little was rendered easy of accomplishment by the uniformity of postage-rates. Not only was the scheme not fairly worked, and the improvements only partially carried out, but they were crippled in their operation by officials who, if not hostile, were half-hearted and far from anxious for a successful issue. The natural difficulties in the way of the measure were numerous 1 Parliamentary Committee, Third Report, p. 64. 204 Her Majesty's Mails. enough without the addition of official opposition. Trade was nourishing when the Postage Bill was carried ; it was fearfully depressed in the first year of penny postage. It is well, as Miss Martineau points out, that none foreknew the heavy reverse which was at hand, and the long and painful depression that ensued after the passing of the Act, for none might then have had the courage to go into the enterprise. This circumstance, accounting, as it does, for some of the deficit in the first and second years, also served to test the real principles of the reform. 1 Mr. Hill's plan, though given over to the apathy and vis inertia of the authorities to " the unwilling horses of the Post-office," as Mr. Baring subsequently designated them really worked well, though at a loss, when everything else was working ill. Moreover, the tendency of cheap com- munication to improve the general revenue of the country was clearly apparent so early as 1842 ; and this is a fact which ought not to be lost sight of for a moment. The reduction of postage- rates was to the community a reduction of taxation ; the capital released was driven into other and perhaps more legitimate channels. The Exchequer lost revenue from one source, but it gained it in other ways, as a consequence on the outlay at the Post-office. In 1842, there was an acknowledged loss to the Post-office revenue of 900,OOOZ. In the same year, no serious deficiency^ appeared in the general accounts of the country, notwithstanding the extent of the depression in trade. There were special as well as general considerations entering into the question of the acknowledged deficiency in this revenue. It is clear that Mr. Hill who did not foresee that so much money would be sacrificed, and who was sanguine of recovering it at no distant date likewise could have had but an indefinite idea of the vast amount of extra machinery that would be called into operation by the full development of his plans ; the extent of the measures that must follow if the country was to be equally privileged with cheap correspondence ; and the conces- sions that would have to be granted when the wedge was driven in by this, his principle measure. As only one of the causes 1 " The first result of the scheme amply vindicated the policy of the new system, but it required progressive and striking evidence to exhaust all opposi- tion." ey. Brit. Eighth Edition. Railway Mail Conveyance. 205 leading to the extra heavy expenses of the Post-office depart- ment, we may mention the changes in the system of mail con- veyance consequent on the introduction of railways. During the year 1838, railways had absorbed a large amount of stage-coach traffic. Mr. Hill, when making his original proposals, calculated that the number of chargeable letters might be increased twenty- four fold without overloading the mails, and without any material addition to the sums paid to contractors. So great and important we would almost say vital was the question of speed to the Post-office, that railways were brought into requisition, although the cost of the carriage of the mails was, at the outset, doubled, tripled, and even quadrupled. But this was not all. Not only did the railways charge more than the coaches, but the charges of the coaches actually increased also. The opening of the railways, by diminishing in great measure the competition which had existed on parallel lines of road, led to an augmentation of the rates in some instances to double the usual cost. Many striking examples of the great difference in the cost of the two services might be given. For instance, 1 so late as 1844, a coach proprietor in the North of England actually paid to the Post- office department the sum of two hundred pounds annually for what he regarded as the privilege of conveying the mails, twice a day, between Lancaster and Carlisle. Now the Post-office pays the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway upwards of 18,000/. annually for the same service. 2 The items of charges for mail conveyance by railway at the present time and for several years past if they could have been known by any means, or even guessed at, by the enterprising post-reformer of 1837 might have had the effect of 1 Postmaster General's First Report. 2 Bearing in mind these facts, the reader will know what amount of value to put upon such statements as the following. Surely Sir Morton Peto cannot have investigated this subject very closely. " The Post-office," says this amateur financier, " found that the railways afforded the means of carry- ing letters at immensely increased speed, and in immensely increased quanti- ties," and so far there is no dispute about it. " They find also, that, pro rata, the cost of conveyance was diminished : for whilst one railway train can convey as many bags of letters as at least 50 of the old mail coaches (why not have said 5,000 instead of 50 ? the railway train could do the one as easily as the other, but is never required to do either), the payment to a railway company for a train is very little in excess of the payment to the contractors for each old mail coach, so that in addition to increased speed, the Post-office acquired the opportunity of carrying vastly increased bulk at very slightly increased cost." (!) Taxation, p. 107. 206 Her Majesty 's Mails. deterring him or others from offering his suggestions when he did. Certain it is, that the proposals would have had but small chance of success, if those who had charge of the fiscal concerns of the country could have known that the sum which would have to be paid by the Post-office to railway companies alone but a very few years from that time, would not fall short of the whole amount standing for the entire postal expenditure of 1839. In 1842, Mr. Hill, as we have before said, left the Treasury, and was thus cut off from all active supervision of his measures. Thereupon the "Mercantile Committee" appealed for redress to Sir Robert Peel, and subsequently the matter was mentioned in the House. Sir Thomas Wilde (afterwards Lord Truro) moved for the appointment of a Committee, in June, 1843. After a long debate, in which Sir Robert Peel said he " did not doubt that there were improvements still to be effected, but I presume that they can be accomplished by the constituted authorities," it was granted. The Committee, over which Sir George Clerk, the Secretary of the Treasury, was appointed chairman, consisted of eight ministerialists and seven Liberal members. Previously, however, to this date, Mr. Hill had petitioned the House of Commons. The petition which was presented by Mr. Baring, the ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer described briefly the Post- office measures of 1839 ; his own appointment to the Treasury ; the fact of his appointment being annulled ; the benefit of the new measures in spite of their partial execution ; the obstructive policy of the Post-office officials ; and thus concludes : " That the opinion adopted by Her Majesty's Government, that the further progress in Post-office improvements may be left to the Post-office itself, is contrary to all past experience, and is contradicted by measures recently adopted by that establishment. " That, notwithstanding the extreme depression of trade which existed when the penny rate was established, and has prevailed ever since ; and notwithstanding the very imperfect manner in which your petitioner's plans have been carried into effect, the want of due economy in the Post-office, the well- known dislike entertained by many of those persons to whom its execution has been entrusted, and the influence such dislike The Select Committee of 1843. 207 must necessarily have upon its success, yet the results of the third year of partial trial, as shown by a recent return made to the House of Lords, is a gross revenue of two-thirds, and a net revenue of one-third, the former amount. " That your petitioner desires to submit the truth of the foregoing allegations to the severest scrutiny, and therefore humbly prays your honourable House will be pleased to institute an inquiry into the state of the Post-office, with the view of adopting such measures as may seem best for fully carrying into effect your petitioner's plans of Post-office improvement, and thus realizing the undoubted intentions of the Legislature." The prayer of the petition was granted, and its proceedings are duly chronicled. 1 The object of this Committee was " to inquire into the measures which have been adopted for the general introduction of a penny rate of postage, and for faci- litating the conveyance of letters ; the results of such measures, as far as relates to the revenue and expenditure of the Post- office and the general convenience of the country ; and to report their observations thereon to the House." Before proceeding to give any account of the further measures brought under discussion in connexion with this Committee, we must give, in a few sen- tences, a resume of the principal improvements which had actually been carried out during the interval of the sittings of the two Committees. 1. The uniform rate of one penny for a letter not above half an ounce, with weight adopted as the standard for increase of charge. 2. The value of a system of prepayment was established, 2 the necessary facility being afforded by the introduction of postage- stamps. Double postage was levied on letters not prepaid. 3. Day-mails were established on the principal railway-lines running out of London, thus giving some of the principal towns 1 Select Committee on the Post-office, 1843. 2 In the last month of high charges, of two and a half million letters passing through the London office, nearly two millions were unpaid, and few more than half a million paid. Twelve months afterwards, the proportion of paid to unpaid letters was entirely changed : the latter had run up to the enormous number of five and a half millions; the former had shrunk to about half a million. 208 Her Majesty's Mails. in the provinces one additional delivery, with two mails from the metropolis in one day. 4. An additional delivery was established in London, and two were given to some of the suburbs. 5. Colonial and foreign rates for letters were greatly lowered, the inland rates viz. the rates paid for those letters passing through this country being abandoned altogether in some cases, as Mr. Hill had recommended. 6. The privilege of franking, private and official, was abolished, and low charges made for the transmission of parliamentary papers. 7. Arrangements were made for the registration of letters. 8. The Money-order office was rendered available to a four- fold extent. And 9. The number of letters increased from 75 millions in 1838-9, to 219 millions in 1 842-3. J This was certainly a large instalment of the improvements which the promoters of penny-post reform hoped to see realized ; but, at the same time, it was only an instalment. The Com- mittee for which Mr. Hill had petitioned must now judge for themselves whether all had been done that might and ought to have been done to enhance the merits of the measure, and make it as profitable to the country as possible. In addition, it was requisite that they should consider several further sugges- tions which Mr. Hill had, since the introduction of his plan, proposed as likely to improve it, as well as hear him on some of the objections that had been raised to it. Thus, with regard to the latter, the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr. Goulbourn) had stated just before the Committee was appointed, that " the Post-office did not now pay its expenses." This statement was startling, inasmuch as Colonel Maberly himself had given 500,0002. or 600,0002. as the proceeds of the penny postage rates in the advent year of the measure. But Mr. Hill resolved the difficulty. The inconsistency was explained quite simply, that in a return furnished by the Post-office, the whole of the cost of the packet-service a little over 600,0002. was charged against the Post-office revenue. Though the cost of the packets had 1 Select Committee on Postage, 1843, p. 93. Security of Letters. 209 not been charged against the Post-office for several years pre- viously, this new item was here debited in the accounts to the prejudice of the scheme ; and Mr. Goulbourn, who disclaimed any hostility to the new measure, thought himself justified, under the circumstances, in making the statement in question. Again : It was strongly and frequently urged that corre- spondence was less secure than under the old system. It was said by the Post-office officials, that the system of prepayment operated prejudicially against the security of valuable letters. Under the old regime it was argued, the postman was charged with a certain number of unpaid letters, and every such letter, so taxed, was a check upon him. " What security," it was now asked, " can there be for the delivery of letters for which the letter-carriers are to bring back no return ?" With prepaid letters, it was said, there was great temptation, unbounded opportunity for dishonesty, and no check. To some extent, and so far as letters containing coin or other articles of value were concerned, there were some grounds for these remarks. It is a great question whether, in the case of valuable letters, the dishonest postman would be discouraged from a depredation by the thought that he would have the postage of the letter to account for ; but still, freedom from all such considerations, under the new system, would clearly seem to increase the risks which the public would have to run. Previously to the penny postage era, all letters containing, or supposed to contain, coin or jewellery, were registered gratuitously at the Post-office as a security against their loss. Under the new system, it was con- sidered impracticable to continue the service, and the Post-office authorities, with the sanction of the Treasury, dropped it alto- gether. The Money-order Office was available ; the fees had been greatly reduced, and the officials, in warning persons against sending coin in letters, strongly recommended that this office should be used for the purpose. Still, the number of coin- letters increased, and the number of depredations increased with them, to the great prejudice of the measure. Mr. Hill, whilst in the Treasury, recommended a system of registration of letters, which appears to have been somewhat similar to a plan pro- posed by the Post-office authorities themselves in 1838. A system of registration was the result ; but the rate of charge of p 2 1 o Her Majesty's Mails. one shilling per letter was enough in itself to render the entire arrangement nugatory. In October, 1841, Lord Lowther pro- posed to the Treasury that they should let him put down the evil in another way, viz. that they should allow him to use his powers, under the 3 & 4 Viet. c. 96, sec. 39, to establish a compulsory registration of letters supposed to contain coin or jewellery, and to make the charge for such compulsory regis- tration a shilling per letter. The Treasury Lords referred the proposal to Mr. Hill. He concurred in the opinion of the Postmaster-General, and thought the principle of compulsory registration quite fair. He pointed out, however, in a letter to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, many objections to the plan, and contended that, so long as the registration fee was fixed at the high rate of a shilling, inducements enough were not held out to the public to register their letters voluntarily. Mr. Hill, therefore, suggested that the fee should be at once lowered to sixpence, to be reduced still further as soon as practicable. The public, under a lower rate, would have little excuse for con- tinuing a bad practice ; but if it was continued, restrictive measures might then be tried, as the only remaining method of protecting the public from the consequences of their own im- prudence. The sixpenny rate would, he thought, be remune- rative ; nor would the letters increase to a much greater number than that reached under the old system when they were regis- tered gratuitously. This subject was still under discussion when the Special Committee was granted, when, of course, all the proposals relative to the registration of letters were laid before it and investigated. Strong objections were made to Mr. Hill's proposition to lower the rate. It was contended that the number of registered letters would so increase, that other Post-office work could not be accomplished. The Postmaster- General, for example, contested the principle of registration altogether, admitting, however, that it was useful in reducing the number of ordinary letters containing coin, and the conse- quent temptations to the officers of the Post-office. Like many of the additional proposals, this subject was left undecided ; but no one at this date questions the propriety of the recom- mendations made under this head. The charge for registration has, within the last few years, been twice reduced, with benefit Mr. Hill's further Proposals. 211 to the revenue, and no hindrance to the general efficiency of the Post-office. Not only so, but the compulsory registration clause is now in active operation. We cannot enter far into the minutiae of the Committee's deliberations. Mr. Hill endeavoured to show that economy in the management of the Post-office had been neglected. The number of clerks and letter-carriers which had sufficed for the complex system that had been superseded, must more than suffice for the work of the office under his simplified arrange- ments : yet no reduction had been made. Economy, he said, had been neglected in the way contracts had been let ; in the manner railway companies were remunerated for carrying mails. He computed that the sum of 10,OOOZ. a-year had been paid to these companies for space in the trains that* had never been occupied. He also endeavoured to show that the salaries of nearly all the postmasters in the country needed revision ; that the establishments of each should also be revised. The changes under the new system, taken together with the changes which railways had made, had had the effect of increasing the work of some offices, but greatly decreasing that of many more. He proposed that there should be a complete revision of work and wages ; that postmasters should be paid on fixed salaries ; and that all perquisites, with the exception of a poundage on the sale of postage-stamps, should be given up. Late-letter fees had, up to the year 1840, been received by the postmasters themselves. Under the Penny Postage Act, however, these fees went to the revenue, and compensation, at a certain fixed rate, was granted to the postmasters in lieu of them. Mr. Hill stated that the amount of compensation granted was generally too much, and was to be accounted for on the ground that the postmasters had, in all the cases, made their own returns. Mr. Hill's principal recommendations to this committee were (1) The plan of a cheap registration of letters. (2) That all inland letters should be prepaid (care being taken that post- masters should be supplied with a sufficient stock of postage- stamps), and double postage charged for all unpaid letters. (3) Reduction in the staff of officers till the number of letters increased to five or sixfold ; that the London officers should be P2 212 Her Majesty's Mails. fully and not only partially employed ; and that female employ- ment might be encouraged in the provinces. (4) Simplification in the mode of assorting letters. (5) The adoption of measures to induce the public to facilitate the operations of the Post-office by giving complete and legible addresses to letters, by making slits in house-doors, and other means. (6) The establishment of a greater number of rural post-offices, till, eventually, there should be one set up in every village. (7) All restrictions as to the weight of parcels to be removed, and a book-packet rate to be established, with arrangements for conveying prints, maps, &c. &c. That railway stations should have post-offices connected with them, and that letter-sorting should be done on board the packets, were among his miscellaneous suggestions. With especial .reference to the London office, Mr. Hill again recommended : (1) The union of the two corps of general and district letter-carriers ; (2) The establishment of district offices ; (3) An hourly delivery of letters instead of one every two hours, the first delivery to be finished by nine o'clock. Nearly the whole of these recommendations were combated and successfully so by the officers of the Post-office, though it is certainly remarkable that, in the face of their opinions, the great majority of the proposals have subsequently been carried out with unquestioned advantage to the service. It would be a weary business to relate the objections made and the exceptions taken to each recommendation as it came up to be considered. If any of our readers are anxious to continue the subject we can promise them that they will now and then find an oasis in the desert of blue book which treats of it, but little more than that. Of course, the non possumus argument was frequently introduced and adhered to. Colonel Maberly said it was an impossibility that there should be hourly deliveries in London. 1 A post-office in every village was impracticable, or, if practicable, quite unnecessary ; and so on. We need only add that the labours of the Committee led to little practical result. They decided, [by a majority of four, not to report any judgment 1 Like the late eminent Dr. Lardner, who wrote an article in the Quarterly to demonstrate that no steamer could possibly cross the Atlantic, and very soon afterwards availed himself of an achievement he had pronounced impos- sible ; so Colonel Maberly now enjoys, we suppose, the benefits of the frequent deliveries in London, against the possibility of which he pronounced. Close of the Inquiry. 213 on the matter. Though this result is not to be wondered at, considering that the majority were ardent supporters of the Government that had dismissed him, it must have been very unsatisfactory to Mr. Hill and all who thought with him. By refusing, however, to exonerate the Post-office from the charges brought against it, the Committee virtually found for the re- former. "With regard to Mr. Hill's further suggestions they refer to the evidence, "and entertain no doubt that his pro- positions will receive the fullest consideration" from the Treasury and the Post-office. So they did eventually after some two or three weary years of waiting, and when the Government was again changed. It is only fair to remark here that after Mr. Hill had been re-installed and set to work upon these various measures, Conservative Ministers no less than the Whig ones worked quite cordially with him, thus proving that they had more confidence in him than their Tory predecessors of 1843, and perhaps that they had little sympathy with the motives which had led to his exclusion. Mr. Hill at this time, however, had no alternative but to leave the whole matter in the hands of the Government, and this he did by taking a place as director of the London and Brighton Railway, at which board he was subsequently appointed chairman. We will close this chapter with his own parting words, addressed to the country at the time when he withdrew from all interference with, or superintendence over, his proposals. " The errors now attending the working of the plan I view with deep regret. Though not in circumstances to disregard the emoluments of office, and far from being so stoical as to slight the pleasure of working out my own plan, I think I can honestly say that I believe my great object has been the measure itself; and that my great regret is to see its benefits impaired or perverted. This, unhappily, I cannot prevent ; but I retire with, I hope, the well-founded confidence of having spared no effort ; and with the consolation I must admit rather a selfish one of feeling that if the present rash course be attended with loss to the revenue, or ill repute either to the plan or financial improvement generally, these are evils for which I cannot be held in any way responsible." 1 i The State and Prospects of Penny Postage. By Rowland Hill. C. Knight and Co. 1844. 214 Her Majesty's Mails. CHAPTER XII. THE LETTER-OPENING COMMITTEE OF 1844, AND THE COM- MISSION ON SUNDAY LABOUR AT THE POST-OFFICE IN 1849. IT will be fresh in the memory of many readers, that the year 1844 revealed to the public certain usages of the Government, and a branch of Post-office business previously kept carefully in the dark which went far to destroy the confidence of the nation in the sanctity of its correspondence. In the session of 1844, Mr. Thomas S. Buncombe presented a petition from Mr. W. J. Linton, M. Mazzini, and two other persons residing at 47, Devonshire Street, Queen's Square, complaining that their letters were regularly detained and opened at the Post-office. The petitioners declared that they " considered such a practice, introducing the spy-system of foreign states, as repugnant to every principle of the British constitution, and subversive of that public confidence which was so essential to a commercial country." The petitioners prayed for an inquiry, and Mr. Buncombe supported their prayer. Sir James Graham, then Home Secretary, got up in the House, and stated that, as regarded three of the petitioners, their letters had not been detained ; as for the case of M. Mazzini, a warrant had been obtained from the Home-office to stop and open the corre- spondence of that 'person. He had the power by law and he had exercised it. " The authority," said Sir James, " was vested in the responsible Ministers of the Crown, and was intrusted to them for the public safety ; and while Parliament placed its confidence in the individual exercising such a power, it was not for the public good to pry or inquire into the particular causes which called for the exercise thereof." 1 He hoped the House would confide in his motives, and that they would not call upon Hansard, vol. kx. pp. 892-9. The Post-office and Letter Opening. 215 him to answer any further inquiries. Mr. Duncombe rose to reply, upon which a question of order was raised. Mr. Buncombe demanded to be heard on a case of urgent personal grievance : " the petitioners," said he, " sought for justice, and as far as his efforts could avail, justice they should have." He then went on to address the House vehemently, and commented strongly on the Home Secretary's refusal to give a full reply. " It was a power," said Duncombe, " which ought to be taken away from any Secretary of State, particularly when exercised in such an unscrupulous manner as it had been within the last two years." He then went into the history of the system. " In the time of Mr. Pitt and Lord Sidmouth, when letters were opened they were always marked with the words ' opened by authority'; at present the case was different ; whilst the Secretary of State retained the same system of espionage, instead of marking the letters thus, they were returned so skilfully closed, that the individual to whom they were addressed was totally ignorant of the fact of their having been so opened." Mr. Wallace next spoke, and in the old exaggerated vein pictured the separate room set apart for the work" at the Post-office, and went on to say that he " believed that persons had been sent abroad, to study in the school of Fouche" how to open, fold, and seal letters carefully." " At the time when franking was the privilege of members," Mr. Wallace continued, he " used to write upon the outside of his letters and franks, ' Please to re-seal and forward this letter after you have read it, and do not burn it.' " Sir James Graham was urged to give more explanation, but he said that having had notice of the motion, he had been quite prepared with his answer, and he had gone as far in explanation as he intended to go. In this, we think, lay his mistake, and the mistake was a fatal one, as it added fuel to the flame. Had the Home Secretary entered more fully into the matter, and carefully given the law as it stood, it is probable that the subject might have been allowed to drop. Nor did Sir James Graham's manner, which was somewhat brusque, improve matters. A few days elapsed, and public attention was thoroughly roused ; the subject came home to every letter-writer ; it was openly stated by the press that a gigantic system of espionage had established itself at St. Martin's-le-Grand, and that, if con- 2 1 6 Her Majesty's Mails. fidence had to be restored, the whole question must be laid open to a searching investigation. In the midst of all this excitement and rancour, we may be sure that Sir James Graham was not spared. The fact was, he was abused most unreasonably. Instead of speaking of the system, or, at any rate, of the Executive Government, who, with Sir James, shared an equal responsibility, there was hardly a public print or public speaker in the kingdom that did not seek to heap insults or expressions of disgust on his name. This state of things could not continue ; accordingly, we find that the Earl of Kadnor moved, without notice, in the House of Lords, for a return of all warrants which had been issued for the detention of letters during a certain period, in the course of which he loudly denounced the practice of issuing general warrants to intercept all letters for a certain person, instead of separate warrants for each letter. 1 This mode of proceeding, he truly urged, was a violation of the statute. Lord Campbell thought the question rather a matter for a court of justice than the House of Lords. Lord Brougham observed that the first statute conferring this power had been framed by Lord Somers. It had been continued by various Acts, and had been exercised by all the Governments down- wards. His opinion was, that nothing but absolute necessity for the safety of the State would justify the arrangement. The sooner they had a new Act the better. Lord Denman was for putting an end to the power altogether. The return was granted, the Duke of Wellington approving the Home Secretary's conduct notwithstanding. On the 24th of June, 1844, Mr. Buncombe again called the attention of the House of Commons to the subject, by presenting a petition from Mr. Charles Stolzman, a Polish refugee, com- plaining that his letters had been detained and opened. Mr. Duncombe contended that the Act of 1837 never meant to confer an authority upon a Minister of the Crown to search out the secrets of exiles resident in this country at the instance of foreign Governments, but was only designed to meet the case of domestic treason. " Mr. Stolzman was a friend of M. Mazzini," said Mr. Duncombe, " and this was why his letters had been tampered with." After describing the way in which 1 Hansard, Ixxv. pp. 975~9. Motions for an Inquiry. 217 letters were opened, he concluded a most powerful speech by again moving for a Committee of Inquiry. He did not want to know Government secrets ; he doubted if they were worth knowing ; but he wanted inquiry into the practice of the department, which he contended was unconstitutional and contrary to law. Sir James Graham, without entering into any further explanation, except saying that the law had not been violated, and that if it had, the hon. member might prove it before a legal tribunal, objected strongly, and in almost a defiant manner, to any Committee. Mr. Macaulay, Lord Howick, Mr. Sheil, and Lord John Kussell warmly supported the motion for an inquiry. Sir Robert Peel, Lord Stanley, and Mr. Monckton Milnes opposed it, when it was rejected by a majority of forty- four. What party speeches failed in doing, the clamour and popular tumult outside at length accomplished. Popular ridicule settled upon the subject ; pencil and pen set to work upon it with a will. Newspapers were unusually, and sometimes unrea- sonably, free in their comments, and all kinds of stories about the Post-office went the round of the press. Sir James Graham had to bear the brunt of the whole business ; whereas the entire Cabinet, but especially Lord Aberdeen, the Foreign Secretary, ought equally to have shared the opprobrium. As it was, the bearing of the Home Secretary in the House of Commons was singularly unwise and unadroit. The subject had now come to be regarded as of too great public importance to be suffered to rest ; besides, it was an attractive one for the Opposition side of the House. Mr. Buncombe renewed his motion towards the end of July in the same session. It was in a slightly altered form, inasmuch as he now moved for a Select Committee " to inquire into a department of Her Majesty's Post-office commonly called ' the secret or inner office,' the duties and employment of the persons engaged therein, and the authority under which the functions of the said office were discharged." Mr. Buncombe made some startling statements as to the mode and extent of the practice of letter-opening, all of which he declared he could prove if the Committee was granted. The Government saw the necessity of giving way, in order that the public mind might be quieted. The Home Secretary now acknowledged, that since he was last questioned on the subject, the matter had assumed 2 T 8 Her Majesty's Mails. a very serious aspect, and he thought it was time that the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, should be told. Though he would have readily endured the obloquy cast upon him, even though it should crush him, rather than injure the public service ; and though he had endured much, especially after the votes and speeches of the Opposition leaders all men conversant with official duties in favour of Mr. Duncombe's former motions, he now felt himself relieved from his late reserve, and felt bound to confess that he believed it to be impossible to maintain the power confided to him longer without a full inquiry. He would now not only consent to the Committee, but would desire that it should make the fullest possible inquiry, and he would promise on his part, not only to state all he knew, but lend all the resources of his department to attain that object. In accordance with this determination, he proposed that the Committee should be a secret one, invested with the amplest powers to commence the investigation at once, and should be composed of five usually voting against the Govern- ment, viz. Sir C. Lemon, Mr. Warburton, Mr. Strutt, Mr. Orde, and the O'Connor Don ; and four who generally supported them, viz. Lord Sandon (chairman), Mr. T. Baring, Sir W. Heathcote, and Mr. H. Drummond. " To this Committee," said Sir James, " I gladly submit my personal honour and my official conduct, and I make my submission without fear." The Committee was appointed after Mr. Wilson Patten's name had been substituted for Mr. Drummond's, on account of the latter being a lawyer ; and after an unsuccessful attempt to add Mr. Duncombe's name, which was rejected by 128 to 52. Its object was " to inquire into the state of the law with respect to the detaining of letters in the General Post-office, and to the mode in which that power had been exercised, and that the Committee should have power to send for persons, papers, and records, and to report the result of their inquiry to the House. A Committee of the House of Lords was appointed at the same time. Sir James Graham's examination lasted four days, when he fulfilled his pledge to make a full and unreserved disclosure of all he knew. Almost all the members of that and former Governments were ex- amined. Lord John Kussell confessed to having done the same as Sir James Graham when he held the seals of the Home-office, An Inquiry is Granted. 219 though he had not used the power so frequently. He also stated that he supported Mr. Buncombe in his previous motions for inquiry, because he thought it necessary that the public should have the information asked for. Lord Normanby had used the power in Ireland for detecting " low Bibbonism, which could not be ferreted out by other means." Lord Tankerville testified to the existence of a warrant signed by Mr. Fox in 1782, ordering the detention and opening of all letters addressed to foreign ministers ; another, ordering that all the letters addressed to Lord George Gordon should be opened. Witnesses were also brought from the Post-office. Mr. Duncombe, on being asked for the witnesses which he had promised, who would sub- stantiate his allegations, refused to hand in a list of them, except the Committee would allow him to be present during the investigation. This was refused. Thereupon Mr. Duncombe appealed to the House, but the decision of the Committee was confirmed. No inconsiderable part of the Committee's time was taken up in the production and examination of records, Acts, and pre- cedents bearing on the subject. The officers of the State Paper- office, and other Government functionaries, produced records and State papers of great importance, from which the student of postal history may learn many interesting particulars. Some of these details as to early letter-opening we have already presented to the reader. During the last century, it would seem from the evidence produced, the practice of granting warrants was ex : ceedingly common ; and they might be had on the most trivial pretences. The English Government might then have vied with that of any of the Continental Powers. Further, it was not the practice to record such warrants regularly in any official book, 1 and few are so recorded : we can only guess at their number from the frequent mention made of them in the State trials of the period, and in other incidental ways. In 1723, at Bishop Atterbury's trial, copies of his letters were produced and given in evidence against him. A clerk from the Post-office certified to the fact that they had passed through the post, and that he had seen them opened, read, and copied. Atterbury, as well he might, asked for the authority for this practice ; and especially, 1 Report of Secret Committee, 1844, p. 9. 22O Her Majesty's Mails. if the Secretary of State had directed that his letters should be interfered with ? A majority in the House of Lords decided that the question should not be answered. It is pleasant to relate that twenty-nine peers recorded an indignant protest against this decision. One of them proposed to cross-examine the Rev. (!) Edward Willes, " one of His Majesty's Post-office decipherers," but the majority, going to a still greater length, resolved : " That it is the opinion of this House that it is not consistent with the public safety to ask the decipherers any questions which may tend to discover the art or mystery of deciphering" : Again, at the trial of Home Tooke for high treason in 1795, a letter written to him by Mr. Joyce, a printer, was intercepted at the Post- office, and was stated by the prisoner to be the immediate occasion of his apprehension. On his requiring its production, a duly certified copy was brought into court by the Crown officers and given in evidence. Twelve years after the trial of Bishop Atterbury, members of both Houses became alarmed for the safety of their correspond- ence, and succeeded in getting up an agitation on the subject. Several members of the House of Commons complained that their letters had been opened. Revelations were made at this time which remind us strongly of the episode of 1844, both discussions resulting in a Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry. It was stated in the debate of 1735, that the liberty which the Act gave " could serve no purpose but to enable the idle clerks about the office to pry into the private affairs of every merchant and gentleman in the kingdom." 2 It transpired on this occa- sion that a regular organization existed, at enormous expense, for the examination of home and foreign correspondence. The Secretary of the Post-office stated that the greater part of 45,OOOZ. had been paid, without voucher of any kind, to Robert, Earl of Oxford, for defraying the expenses of this establishment. Among the principal annual expenses were the salaries of the chief decipherers 3 (Dr. Willes and his son), 1,000?. ; the second deci- 1 Lords' Journal, xii. pp. 183-6. 2 Commons' Journal, vol. xxii. p. 462. 3 The place was not only lucrative, but in the path of promotion. We find that, for the proper performance of these very unclerical duties, the Rev. Dr. was first rewarded with the Deanery of Lincoln and afterwards with the Bishopric of St. David's. 4 ' Letter-Deciphering" 221 pherer,800Z. ; the third, 5001 ; four clerks, 1,600Z. ; doorkeeper, 501. ; incidental charges, but principally for seals, 100Z. The result of the inquiry was, that the Committee condemned the practice, and the House declared that it was a breach of privilege on the part of the Government to use the power except in the exact manner described in the statute. Whether any real improvement took place may best be judged by the following circumstances. Walpole, who doubtless carried his prerogative in those matters beyond any two Secretaries of State we could mention, lent his ear to both public and private applications alike, issuing warrants even to further cases of private tyranny. In the Report of the Secret Committee, p. 12, we find that a warrant was granted, in 1741, for what purpose may be judged by the following: "At the request of A, a warrant is issued to permit A's eldest son to open and inspect any letters which A's youngest son might write to two females, one of which that youngest son had imprudently married." And this inquisitorial spirit, beginning with the highest, descended even to the lowest class of officials. Mr. E. Edwards in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. xviii. p. 405 (quoting from the State Trials, vol. xviii. p. 1369), tells us, in relation to this subject, that so little attention was paid to. the requirements of the Act of Queen Anne, or the Committee of the House of Commons just referred to, that the very bellmen took to scrutinizing the letters given them for their bags. One of those functionaries was examined at the trial of Dr. Hensey in 1758, and deposed as follows : " When I have got all my letters together I carry them home and sort them. In sorting them I observed that the letters I received of Dr. Hensey were generally directed abroad and to foreigners ; and I, knowing the Doctor to be a Koman Catholic, advised the examining-clerk at the office to inspect his letters." This witness, in answer to the questions, " How came you to know Dr. Hensey to be a Koman Catholic ?" and "What had you to do with his religion?" clinched his evidence thus : " We letter-carriers and postmen have great opportunities to know the characters and dispositions of gentle- men, from their servants, connexions, and correspondents. But, to be plain, if I once learn that a person who lives a genteel life is a Roman Catholic, I immediately look upon him as one who, 222 Her Majesty's Mails. by education and principle, is an inveterate enemy to my king and country ! " At the beginning of the present century an improvement was carried out. It was seen that the indiscriminate issue of the warrants was stimulated and fostered by the fact that no account was kept of them. As a means of placing a necessary check upon the officers, Lord Spencer, then Home Secretary, introduced the custom in 1806, of recording the dates of all warrants granted, and the purposes for which they were issued. Since the year 1822, the whole of the warrants themselves have been preserved at the Home-office. In comparing the number of warrants issued by different Home Secretaries during the present century, we find that Sir James Graham enjoys the unenviable notoriety of having granted the greatest number, though the fact is partly explained by the commotion which the Chartists made in the north of England, 1842-3. The revelations made in the two Committees with reference to foreign correspondence, especially that of foreign Ministers accredited at the English Court, were very remarkable, and not likely to induce confidence in our postal arrangements on the part of other Powers. It was shown that in times of war whole foreign mails had been known to have been detained, and the letters almost individually examined. The Lords' Committee went so far as to say it was clear, " that it had been for a long period of time and under successive administrations, up to the present time, an established practice that the foreign corre- spondence of foreign Ministers passing through the General Post-office should be sent to a department of the Foreign- office, before the forwarding of such correspondence, according to the address." What the feelings of foreign Governments were at this revelation may well be imagined. They would know, of course, that the English Government, hundreds of years ago, had not scrupled to lay violent hands on the letters of their representatives, if by any possibility they could get hold of them. When Wolsey, for example, wanted possession of the letters of the ambassadors of Charles V. he went to work very openly, having ordered " a watche should be made " in and about London, and all persons going en route to the Continent to be questioned and searched. " One riding towards Brayne- Finding of the Committee of 1844. 223 ford," says an early record, " when examyned by the watche, answered so closely, that upon suspicion thereof, they searched him, and found secretly hyd aboute hym a pacquet of letters in French." In the reign of Queen Mary, Gardiner ordered that the messengers of Noailles, the French ambassador, should be taken and searched in much the same manner. 1 Notwithstand- ing this, they would scarcely be prepared for the information that later Governments, with less to fear, had preferred more secret measures, establishing a system of espionage which was certainly not in accordance with the English character, or likely to subserve the interests of peace in Europe. That the arrange- ment with regard to foreign mails was unlawful, may be judged by the prompt action which was taken in the matter. " Since June, 1844, the Postmaster-General," so runs the Lords' Eeport two months later, " having had his attention called to the fact that there was no sufficient authority for this practice, has discontinued it altogether." The Commons' Committee reported that the letter-opening warrants might be divided into two classes (1) Those issued in furtherance of criminal justice, usually for the purpose of afford- ing some clue to the hiding-place of an offender, or to the mode or place of concealment of property. (2) Those issued for the purpose of discovering the designs of persons known or sus- pected to be engaged in proceedings dangerous to the State, or deeply involving British interests, from being carried on in the United Kingdom. In the case of both classes of warrants, the mode of proceeding was nearly similar. The first were issued on the application of the law-officers ; the principal Secretary of State himself determined when to issue the latter. No record was kept of the grounds on which the second class of warrants were issued. "The letters which have been detained and opened are," according to the Committee, 2 " unless retained by special order, as sometimes happens in criminal cases, closed and resealed without affixing any mark to indicate that they have been so detained and opened, and are forwarded by post accord- ing to their respective superscriptions." They then classed the warrants issued during the present century in the following 1 Fronde. 2 Report of Secret Committee, 1844, pp. Li 17. 224 H r Ma testy's Mails. way : For thefts, murders, and frauds, 162 ; for treason and sedition, 77 ; foreign correspondence, 20 ; prisoners of war, 13 ; miscellaneous, 1 1 ; and for uncertain purposes, 89. Undoubtedly, with one class of letters, the Government were only performing a duty in applying the law as laid down in 1 Viet. c. 33. The information obtained by the warrants to find the locale of Chartist disaffection was described by the Committee as most valuable and useful to the Government. While the whole history of the transaction in question grates unpleasantly on English ears, there can be no doubt that in other cases such as frauds on the banks and revenue, forgeries, murders, &c. the power was used impartially to the advantage of individuals and the benefit of the State. Whether, however, the discoveries and the benefits were so many as to counterbalance the odium of countenancing what was so like a public crime, and which violated public confidence in the Post-office, or whether the issue of a few warrants annually, in proportion to the 40,000 committals 1 which took place yearly at that time, could by any means be called an efficient instrument of police, are vastly different questions. With regard to the general question of letter-opening, the issue was altogether vague and uncertain. Though the practical end of the inquiry was, no doubt, gained, and warrants may be said to have ceased, still the Committees recommended Parliament to decide that the power and prero- gative of opening letters, under certain given circumstances, should not be abrogated. They argued that, if the right of the Secretary of State was denied, it would be equivalent to adver- tising to every criminal conspirator against the public peace, that he might employ the Post-office with impunity. 2 It was decided, in consequence of this finding, that the law should remain unaltered. Mr. Duncombe was not satisfied. In the next session he attempted to revive the subject by calling the attention of the House to " the evasive and unsatisfactory character of the report of the Secret Committee," and moving the appointment of a Select Committee to investigate the whole subject over again ; but he met with little success. Sir J. Graham, Sir E. Peel, 1 Report of the Secret Committee, 184.4, pp. 1417. 2 Ibid. Commons' Committee. Attempts to Revive the Subject. 225 Viscount Sandon, Mr. Warburton, Mr. Ward, and Lord John Manners, spoke against his motion, which he then withdrew. Upon this, Lord Howick tried to carry a resolution for the appointment of a Committee to inquire into the case of Mr. Duncombe's letters only. Mr. Disraeli seconded the motion, desiring not to have the Government censured, but to see the practice condemned. Mr. Koebuck believed that the country would not be content until the invidious power intrusted to the Secretary of State respecting letter-opening was absolutely abolished. Lord John Russell spoke against the motion, which was lost, after a fierce debate, of three nights, by 240 to 145 members. 1 After a few days' repose, Mr. Buncombe moved that Colonel Maberly should attend at the bar, and produce certain books connected with his office. The Home Secretary resisted the motion, grounding his objection on the finding of the two Com- mittees, as well as on the necessities of the public service. Lord John Russell and the other Liberal leaders concurring, the motion was negatived by 188 to 113. 2 It was some time before the subject was again mentioned, and might now have dropped, but for the unfortunate occurrence in Italy, which resulted in the death of the brothers Bandieri, which many traced to the action of the English Government. Mr. Shiel hereupon moved a resolution on the 1st of April, 1845, expressing regret that the Government had opened Mazzini's letters, thus frustrating the political movement in Italy. Only thirty-eight in a full house affirmed this proposition. After a motion from Mr. Wakley, and another from Mr. Duncombe, lost by 161 to 78, this long controversy was finally set at rest. The English people, it must be added, all along objected less to the power which the Government possessed in the exercise of its discretion than to the manner in which that power was exercised. Mr. Duncombe's statements during the earlier stages of the discussions, relating to the "secret office" never denied could not be forgotten by the public when they intrusted their letters to the custody of the Post-office. The revelations in question caused " a perfect paroxysm of national anger, ;) because it was felt, throughout the length and breadth of the land, that such arrangements were repugnant to every feeling of i Hansard, hxvii. p. 1,025. 2 Ibid. Ixxx. Q 226 Her Majesty's Mails. Englishmen. Had the officers of the Government broken open letters in the same way as, under certain circumstances, the law allows the sheriff's officers to break open houses and writing- desks, there might still have been complainings, but these com- plainings would neither have been so loud nor yet so justifiable. 1 There was something in the melting apparatus, in the tobacco- pipe, in the forged plaster of paris seals, in the official letter- picker, and in the place where, and manner how, he did his work, utterly disgusting to John Bull, and most unsuitable to the atmosphere of England. The law, it is true, remains unaltered, but it is believed to be virtually a dead letter. The year 1849 is principally remarkable for the agitation which occurred throughout the country in respect to Sunday labour at the Post-office. A few words must suffice to explain the state of matters before this time. From the earliest establish- ment of the Post-office, no letter delivery took place in the metropolis on the first day of the week. Up to 1849, the whole of the Sunday work at the General Post-office, consisted of that connected with the receipt of certain kinds of government and official letters, attended to by a single clerk and three messengers. In the provincial towns and throughout the country the arrange- ments were quite different, and letter delivery on Sundays had existed from the earliest times. This state of things might have continued with mutual satisfaction, but for a hitch in the machinery of operations, through which the one interest suffered by the arrangements for the other a large number of provincial letters being detained in London in transitu for full thirty-six hours. Our readers will remember that we have frequently spoken of the importance of the chief office as a " forwarding office ; " of London being a centre from which radiated innumerable lines 1 Among many expressions of opinion to which the inquiry on the subject pave rise, we find the following characteristic effusion from Thomas Carlyle : " It is a question vital to us that sealed letters in an English Post-office be, as we all fancied they were, respected as things sacred; that opening of men's letters, a practice near of kin to picking men's pockets, and to other still viler and far fataler forms of scoundrelism, be not resorted to in England, except in cases of the very last extremity. When some new Gunpowder Plot may be in the wind, some double-dyed high treason, or imminent national wreck not avoidable otherwise, then Jet us open letters; not till then. To all Austrian Kaisers and such like, in their time of trouble, let us answer, as our fathers from of old have answ ered Not by such means is help here for you," Sunday Labour. 227 of road ; and that no better arrangement could be made for certain classes of letters passing between remote districts than sending them "forward" through the metropolis. Not only go, but there were the " through letters," letters for instance sent from the North or West for places in Kent or Sussex or other districts beyond London ; and these as well as the "forward" correspondence were inevitably detained by this flaw in the system. A remedy was now proposed with the object of meet- ing this obstruction, but only after other means had been tried in provincial offices to prevent these letters going to London at all (expedients, it should be stated, which caused much expendi- ture of extra labour in the country). It was now determined that forward bags, containing these letters, should be opened and sorted at the General Post-office on Sunday mornings, and forwarded hence by the night mails in the evening. The extra work was to be done by twenty-six men, who should work only between the hours of eight and ten in the morning, who should volunteer for the duty, and -only take it in turns. The Post- master-General might have fired a train to judge by the commo- tion that ensued. This simple-enough measure, which really ended in a permanent reduction of work, caused a great excite- ment in London and also in some provincial towns. Petitions were poured in to the two Houses of Parliament, signed by nearly as many people as expressed a wish to have the boon of penny postage. The Lord's Day Observance Society led the agitation ; hence the prayer of the various petitioners sought, to a great extent, a common object. The burden of the petitions was, that (1) there should be no delivery or despatch of letters throughout the country on the Sunday ; and (2) for a total stoppage of all mail conveyance on that day. Of course public opinion, especially in the provinces, was divided on the subject. Many good men held the opinion that they were not violating the sanctity of the Sabbath by receiving their correspondence, and that they might as well have the whole as only a part of it on that day. However selfish this endeavour to keep a large staff of officers constantly employed, Sunday after Sunday, in provincial towns, may appear, we would not attempt to dispute with them the ground they took. The agitation gave birth to various published letters, among which, perhaps the most 228 Her Majesty's Mails. important was one from Dr. Vaughan, the late Head-Master of Harrow School, and now the respected vicar of Doncaster. He protested against the contemplated change being considered an " affront to religion or a violation of the rights of conscience." For this expression of opinion very ably defended, he had to run the gauntlet of several clerical pamphleteers. As a result of the movement, a motion for an address to the Queen, praying that the Sunday delivery might be stopped all over the country, was made in the House of Commons and carried by a large majority. An able writer in commenting 1 upon this vote would have us believe that the success which attended the mover and his " pious coadjutors " was owing to the allurements of a court ball held the same night, where all but the unca gude of our senators danced attendance ! It is much more reasonable to suppose that the members of the House of Commons were mistaken as to the feeling of the nation, or that they were disposed to think, as many still think, that if the people of London could wait for their letters with becoming patience till Monday morning, the population of other large towns might also do so. Actuated doubtless by the same feeling, Lord John Eussell, who was at the head of the Government, gave way to this expression of opinion. The same reviewer, with another departure from the staid proprieties of the venerable organ in which he writes, tells us that the Premier granted the prayer to punish the House for its bigotry. But such trifling with legislation would have ill become his character, or that of his cabinet, and is certainly not consonant with the known and felt importance of the subject. However it was, there was soon great dissatisfaction at the working of the new measures throughout the country. We can all easily imagine the result to the tens of thousands to whom their budget of letters on a Sunday morning offered their only occupation, and how they would be ready to resent this infrac- tion of their time-honoured privilege. A noisy minority, even supposing they were not more than a minority, would soon make themselves formidable in complaint, and this they seem to have neglected no opportunity of doing. A re-action set in and nothing was so certain as this re-action and the subject was remitted to a Commission of Inquiry, 1 Edinburgh Review, No. ccxlv. pp. 74, 75. The Commission of Inquiry. 229 consisting of Lord Clanricarde, 1 Mr. Labouchere, and the late Sir George Cornewall Lewis. On the strength of the report of this commission, the work at the General Post-office somewhat altered by being thrown more into the travelling offices was continued, and Sunday delivery in England, with a few exceptions (where the arrangement is the same as in Scotch towns), was restored from that time to this. The report in question, from its general importance, as well as the fairness and candour which characterize it, deserves a few words in passing. It opened with the following sentence : " In exercising the monopoly of postal conveyance, the Government as it appears to us, takes upon itself the duty of forwarding the public correspondence without any delay which may not be demanded by reasons of the most cogent nature." They then went into the history of Sunday duty ; noticed that the Post-office was not the only branch, of the public service in which a certain amount of Sunday labour was required ; and showed how derangement followed from exceptional working. The recommendation made with regard to the London office, with special reference to the casus belli, was that the arrangement in force should be continued. With respect to provincial offices that one delivery of letters should be made on the Sunday morning, the delivery not to interfere with the hours of divine service ; and that as far as possible every post-office should be closed at 10 A.M. on Sundays. Further, they recommended that where the duties were "such as to prevent a rural letter-carrier from attending divine service, an arrangement should be made for providing a substitute at least on the alternate Sundays ; " that, in retaining a Sunday delivery in a rural district, the Postmaster-General should be " guided by the prevalent feeling of the district ; " and, in conclusion, that every householder be allowed to " suspend the delivery of letters at his own house in either town or country, if he chooses to do so." The whole of these recommendations have been carried out, and from time to time different portions of Sunday duty have been dispensed with. Rural messengers travel less ; the post- 1 We would take this opportunity of noting that much of the successful carrying out of the penny-postage reform, and the development of many of Sir E. Hill's subsequent plans, treated of in the next chapter, is due to the Marquis of Clanricarde, who, when at the head of postal affairs, devoted an unusual amount of energy and attention to the department. 230 Her Majesty's Mails. offices in the major part of English and Scotch villages are not opened ; and, since 1850, the Sunday day-mails have almost entirely ceased running. On the whole, it cannot be said that the fullest licence was not, and is not still given, to the entire population, or that the different tastes and feelings of each class have not been consulted. Apart from the consideration that post-office officials in the provinces seem to be less cared for in the way of Sunday rest and Sunday privileges than those in the metropolis, we cannot find any ground for dissatisfaction with, the footing upon which the matter was eventually placed. R ural Posts. 231 CHAPTER XIII. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POST-OFFICE. FROM the year 1844 to the present time the progress of the Post-office institution has been great and unexampled. Among Mr. Hill's minor proposals were those for the institution of day- mails, the establishment of rural posts, and the extension of free deliveries. The period between the passing of the Penny Postage Act and the year 1850 saw these useful suggestions carried out to an extent which proved highly beneficial to the public. With regard to the day-mails, Mr. Hill proposed that on the morning of each day, as well as evening, mails should leave London after certain country and continental mails had arrived, by which means letters, instead of remaining nearly twenty-four hours in London, might be at once forwarded to their addresses, and two mails per diem be thus given to most English towns. The Earl of Lichfield would seem to have seen the useful and practicable nature of these proposals, for, being Postmaster-General at the time, he did not wait to adopt them till the passing of the Act of 1839. As early as 1838 one or two day-mails were established, running out of London. Before 1850 we find the list included those of Dover, Southampton, Bristol, Birmingham, and Cam- bridge. These day-mails are now established on every consi- derable line of railway in the kingdom. London, in 1864, possesses not only day-mails on all the lines running from the metropolis, but one to Ireland, and two by different routes into Scotland. Further, a great number of railways in the United Kingdom have stipulated to take mails by any passenger-train. Mr. Hill also contemplated the establishment of rural posts in every village. This work had been started on the introduc- tion of penny postage, but in 1842 there were still hundreds of registrar's districts without postal accommodation. Up to Mr. Hill's time the urban districts were miserably supplied with 232 Her Majesty's Mails. post-offices, and those only were set up on guarantees being furnished to the Post-office. Hence the name of " Guarantee Posts," called also "Fifth Clause Posts," and "Convention Posts," inasmuch as the Post-office paid only a portion of the expenses, the remainder being made up by local exertions in the district. Mr. Hill, in 1838, and again in 1843, urged the adoption of a plan to furnish a post-office throughout every registrar's district in England and Wales ; then to adopt a similar arrangement if it succeeded for Scotland and Ireland ; and finally to establish a means of delivering letters in every village throughout the kingdom without any extra charge. He was satisfied that a system of rural posts such as this which might be entirely established for 70,000?. would soon be profit- able, and he instanced the beneficial working of the poste rurale in France. There are now more than 8,000 additional rural post-offices since 1839, the erection of which has done all for the public and the Post-office revenue that Mr. Hill anticipated. The extension of free deliveries, also strongly urged by Mr. Hill, has progressed fairly from that time to this. Bound each provincial town there used to be drawn a cordon, letters, &c. for places beyond which had either to be brought by private mes- sengers, or were charged an extra sum on delivery as a gratuity to the postmaster. From year to year new places have been included in these free deliveries ; soon the most remote and inaccessible parts of our country the nooks and crannies of our land will enjoy nearly equal privileges with our large towns, more rural messengers being appointed as this work approaches completion. In 1848, the advantages of a book-post were granted to the country. By the new rate, a single volume might be sent to any part of the United Kingdom at the uniform rate of sixpence per pound. The privileges of this book-post were gradually extended to the colonies. The railway companies, at the time and subsequently, complained loudly that the Post-office, by establishing the book-post, had entered into an unfair competi- tion with them. This competition was described as very in- jurious, on account of the low rates at which books and book-packets were conveyed. It was answered, however and in this answer the country very generally agreed that the Post-office Reports. 233 railway companies had no legal or equitable right to the monopoly of parcel-traffic ; and if they had, the exceptions taken in the case of the book-post were only to books and printed matter intimately connected with objects such as the diffusion of knowledge and the promotion of education matters with which the Post-office was now most immediately concerned. The facts, however, were, that very few indeed of the packets sent by the book 7 post were such as had been previously sent by railway. The Post-office, by offering its vast machinery for the transmission of such articles, especially to remote districts, gave facilities which had never before been offered, and which caused books and documents to pass through the Post-office which otherwise, had no book-post existed, would not have been sent through any other channel. A Select Committee, which sat in 1854, on the conveyance of mails by railway, took evidence on this point, and in their report stated it as their opinion, that a large proportion of the packets sent would not have been so forwarded but for the facilities offered by the Post-office in their distribution. Any loss, however, which the railways might experience in this respect was more than counterbalanced when the Executive abolished the compulsory impressed stamp on newspapers, this arrangement giving rise to a conveyance of newspaper-parcels by railway-trains to an enormous extent, and proportionately lessening the work and profits of the Post-office. In 1855 the Postmaster-General, the late Lord Canning, commenced the practice of furnishing the Lords of the Treasury, and through them the public, with annual reports on the Post- office. These reports, which have been continued up to the present time, show the progress of the Department from year to year, and present to the general reader, as well as to the statis- tician, a vast mass of interesting information carefully and lucidly compiled. 1 Lord Canning, in recommending the adop- tion of the plan, gave as one reason, among many, that the Post-office service was constantly expanding and improving, but that information respecting postal matters, especially postal changes, was not easily accessible. This information, he be- 1 This is especially true of the Tenth Report just issued, which is even more original aud suggestive than its predecessors. 234 H er Majesty's Mails. lieved, could be given without any inconvenience, whilst many misapprehensions, and possibly complaints, might be avoided. The public might thus see what the Post-office was about ; learn their duty towards the Department, and find out what half the people did not then and perhaps do not even yet understand what were the benefits and privileges to which they were justly entitled at its hands. The Duke of Argyll succeeded Lord Canning in the manage- ment of the Post-office in 1855, and his years of office are distinguished by many most important improvements and reforms. One important change consisted in the amalgamation of the two corps of London letter-carriers, effected soon after the installation of the Duke of Argyll at the Post-office. The two classes of " General Post " and " London District " letter-carriers were perhaps best known before 1855, by the former wearing a red, and the latter a blue, uniform. The object of this amalga- mation, for which Mr. Hill had been sedulously striving from the period of penny postage, was to avoid the waste of time, trouble, and expense consequent on two different men going over the same ground to distribute two classes of letters which might, without any real difficulty, be delivered together. The greatest objection in the Post-office itself to completing the change, arose from the different status of the two bodies of men, the one class being paid at a much higher rate of wages and with better prospects than the other class. This difficulty was at length surmounted, when the benefits of this minor reform became clearly apparent in earlier and more regular deliveries of letters. Inside the Post-office the work was made much more easy and simple, and the gross inequality existing between two bodies of public servants whose duties were almost identical, was done away. 1 Still more important was the division of London into ten postal districts, carried out during the year 1856. The immense magnitude of the metropolis necessitated this scheme ; it having been found impossible to overcome the obstacles to a more speedy transmission of letters within and around London, or properly to manage, without some change, the ever-increasing amount of Post-office business. Under the new arrangements, 1 Postmaster-General's First Report, p. 35. The London Districts. 235 each district was to be treated in many respects as a separate town, district post-offices to be erected in each of them. Thus, instead of all district post-letters being carried from the re- ceiving houses to the chief office at St. Martin's-le-Grand, there to be sorted and re-distributed, the letters must now be sent to the principal office of the district in which they were posted ; sorted there ; and distributed from that office according to their address. The time and trouble saved by this arrangement is, as was expected, enormous. Under the old system, a letter from Cavendish Square to Grosvenor Square went to the General Post-office, was sorted, and then sent back to the latter place, travelling a distance of four or five miles : whereas, at present, with hourly deliveries, it is almost immediately sent from one place to the other. 1 An important part of the new scheme was, that London should be considered in the principal provincial post-offices as ten different towns, each with its own centre of operations, and that the letters should be assorted and despatched on this principle. Country letters would be delivered straight- way without any intermediate sorting to that particular part of London for which they were destined ; whilst the sorters there having the necessary local knowledge, would distribute them immediately into the postmen's walks. With respect to the smaller provincial towns, it was provided that their London correspondence should be sorted into districts on the railway during the journey to the metropolis. Thus, on the arrival of the different mails at the several railway termini, the letters would not be sent as formerly to the General Post-office, but direct to each district office, in bags prepared in the course of the journey. It was a long time before this new and important plan was thoroughly carried out in all its details ; but now that it is in working order, the result is very marked in the earlier delivery of letters, and in the time and labour saved in the various processes. In fact, all the anticipated benefits have flowed from the adoption of the measure. In the same year a reduction was made in the rates for book- packets. The arrangement made at this time, which exists at 1 So late as the year 184-2, a letter posted at any London receiving-house after two in the afternoon was not delivered at Islington until the next morning. Postmaster-General's Secoiul Report. 236 Her Majesty's Mails. present, charges one penny for every four ounces of printed matter ; a book weighing one pound being charged fourpence. A condition annexed was, that every such packet should be open at the ends or sides, and if closed against inspection, should be liable to be charged at the unpaid letter rate of postage. This penalty was soon found to be unreasonably heavy and vexatious, and was therefore reduced to an additional charge of sixpence only. At the present time, the conditions under which such packets may be sent through the post are the same, but the fines inflicted for infringements are still further reduced. In 1857 a new regulation provided that a book-packet might consist of any number of sheets, which might be either printed or written, provided there was nothing in it of the nature of a letter. If anything of the sort should be found in the packet on examination, it was to be taken out and forwarded separately as a letter, and charged twopence as a fine in addition to the postage at the letter rate. The packet might consist of books, manuscripts, maps, prints with rollers, or any literary or artistic matter, if not more than two feet wide, long, or deep. In the same year, the letter-rate to all the British Colonies (which were not previously under the lower rates) was reduced to the uniform one of sixpence for each half-ounce, payable in advance. The privileges of the English book-post were also extended to the Colonies ; the rate at which books, &c. might be sent being threepence for every four ounces. Exceptions were made in respect to the following places, viz. Ascension Island, East Indies, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand, and the Gold Coast, to which places the rate charged was fourpence for four ounces, the weight being restricted to three pounds. Another important improvement was made when, about the same time, the postage on letters conveyed by private ship between this country and all parts of the world, was reduced to a uniform rate of sixpence the half-ounce. Nor were these reforms the only results of the wise rule of the Duke of Argyll. Through his exertions, a postal convention was concluded with France, resulting not only in a considerable reduction of postage on letters passing between the two countries, but in the lowering of the rate to all European countries, letters Railway Legislation. 237 for which went by way of France. An attempt was made to arrange a postal convention with the United States during the year 1857, but like so many previous ones, it came to nothing. The Duke of Argyll is also favourably remembered in the metropolitan offices, for having granted to the major establish- ment at any rate the boon of a Saturday half-holiday. But perhaps his Grace laboured most arduously to bring about a more satisfactory relation between the railway companies and the Post-office. Since the advent of cheap postage, nothing had so much impeded the progressive development of the Post-office, as the adverse attitude of the companies who must convey the mails, now that all other modes of conveyance had been virtually superseded by the power of steam. Although the Postmaster- General failed in this instance, he is none the less entitled to the gratitude of the country for his well-meant attempt to repair the mistake which the Executive originally made in not care- fully providing for the public service. Few could say that the existing law was, and is, not defective. The gain to the Post- office through railways is certainly enormous : besides the advantages of increased speed, they make it possible to get through the sorting and the carrying of the mails at the same time. But here the gain ends ; and, as we have previously said, the cost of the service really done is heavy beyond all proportion. The cost of carrying mails by coaches averaged twopence farthing a mile ; the average cost under railways (now that so many companies take bags by all trains) for 1864, averages sixpence a mile, some railways charging nearly five shillings a mile for the service they render. The cost of running a train may be reckoned in most cases from a shilling to fifteen pence per mile ; and thus the Post-office, for the use of a fraction of a train, may be said constantly to be paying at the rate of from fifty to two hundred and fifty per cent, in excess of the whole cost of running ! The Postmaster-General stated that the terms under which one railway company would undertake postal service was totally disproportionate to those of a neighbouring company. On the other hand, all the companies were alike dissatisfied, however dissimilar the contracts, or the terms imposed and agreed to. 1 Moreover, it was declared next to impossible to 1 See address by the late Mr. Robert Stephenson oil his election to the 238 Her Majesty's Mails. secure regularity and punctuality in the conveyance of mails, and to agree to amicable arbitration for the service done, until the Legislature should lay down reasonable laws, binding all the companies alike. A Bill was introduced into the House of Lords regulating the arrangements between the Post-office and the different companies. Though it was carefully prepared, it was strongly opposed by the railway interest in Parliament. The opposition was all the more unreasonable, inasmuch as many of its clauses had been inserted, as it were, at the instance of the railway companies themselves. As far as the Post-office was concerned, it seems to have been the extent of the wish of the authorities that the question of remuneration might be based on the actual cost of running the trains, making due allowance, on the one hand, for the benefits accruing to the companies from their connexion with the mail service, and adding, on the other hand, compensation for any special extra expenses to which the companies might be subjected by the requirements of that service, together with a full allowance for profit. 1 The Bill also provided for the more extensive employment of ordinary Presidency of the Institution of Civil Engineers in 1855, given in the appendix to the larger edition of Mr. Smiles' Life of George Stephenson. Mr. Edward Page, the present able Inspector-General of Mails, replied to his address in a lucid and lengthy report, to be found in the Postmaster-General's Second Report, pp. 44 55. Upon this, Mr. Stephenson published a second Address on the subject, which according to Sir Morton Peto, " quite snuffed out " the Post-office authorities. This second Address was not replied to we should think for we do not happen to have any exact official information on the subject because, firstly, many parts of it were most evidently based on a mis- conception of the motive which induced the Post-office to notice at all the first address, which was not "to depreciate the advantages afforded to the Post-office by railways," as Mr. Stephenson alleged, but only to controvert his statements attaching to railways what was thought an undue value in regard to postal facilities, was not meant to prove that " for the purposes of the Post-office, we had better have been without railways," or that mail coaches could have worked at less expense in opposition to railways, for both pro- positions would be manifestly absurd. The advantages accruing to the Post- office from railways are fully admitted on page 55 of the Post-office Report. And secondly, because Mr. Stephenson omitted to refer in his second address to many most important considerations which Mr. Page adduced. " If the Government and the Railway Companies," concluded Mr. Stephenson, " went hand iu hand, arrangements might be made by which the whole correspondence of the nation might be carried on, in a much more perfect manner with advantage to the Companies, and without any direct payment by the Govern- ment," p. 32. What would this self-denying ordinance have been ? How curious that the matter ended here ! i Appendix to Postmaster-General's Second Report, p. 51. Compulsory Prepayment of Letters. 239 passenger trains, not, however, to the supercession of the regular mail-trains, for the exclusive employment of certain trains for postal purposes, for penalties, &c. The measure had been brought in late in the session, and was eventually with- drawn. The Bill itself, with its twenty-one clauses, forms part of the Appendix to the Postmaster-General's fourth report ; and as the basis of arrangements between the two interests is still unsettled and uncertain, the Duke of Argyll there commends it to the careful attention of the public, as well as to the fair con- sideration of the railway authorities themselves. In 1858, on the accession of Lord Derby to power, Lord Colchester was appointed to the Post-office without a seat in the Cabinet. Improvements continued during his short ad- ministration, both as regards inland, foreign, and colonial postages ; but nothing calls for special mention here except an attempt on the part of the Post-office to render the payment of inland letters compulsory. The plan cannot be said to have had a fair trial. Its benefits and advantages were not clearly apparent, except to those who were acquainted with the machinery of the Post-office. While, without doubt, the principles upon which it was based were sound, the objections to the arrange- ment lay on the surface, and were such as could not be overcome except by the exercise of great patience on the part of the public : the measure pressed heavily on certain interests : a great portion of the less thoughtful organs of the public press manifested considerable repugnance to it, and, in consequence, the Postmaster-General was led to recommend to the Treasury the withdrawal of the order after the expiration of a few weeks of partial trial. As pointed out by Mr. Hill at the time, com- pulsory prepayment of letters was a part of the original plan of penny postage ; it was one of the recommendations which he made, having for their object the simplification of accounts, and the more speedy delivery of letters. The Secretary of the Post- office in urging a fair trial of the measure, 1 argued that after the lapse of a few months it would be productive of good even to letter- writers, not to speak of the saving of time, trouble, and expense to the Department. He added that there were no difficulties attributable to the new rule which might not be surmounted by 1 Fifth Report, Appendix, pp. 4348. 240 Her Majesty's Mails. a little care or ingenuity. 1 As it was, the public preferred an immediate termination of the experiment to the possible and problematical advantages that might arise from its continuance ; and in this instance the country was indulged by an early return to the old plan. In the following year, Lord Colchester was succeeded by the late Earl of Elgin as Postmaster-General, with a seat in Lord Palmerston's Cabinet. When Lord Elgin was sent on the special mission to the East in 1860, the Duke of Argyll held the joint offices of Lord Privy Seal and Postmaster-General until a permanent successor was appointed in the person of Lord Stanley of Alderley, who still ably fills the office. In 1859, the Money-order Office in London, and the money- order system generally, were remodelled. By a process meant to simplify the accounts, and other judicious alterations, a saving of 4,OOOZ. a year was effected, while the public were benefited by some concessions that had been much desired, such as the granting of money-orders up to the amount of 10/5. instead of 51. The money-order system was likewise extended to the colonies, the first connexion of the kind having been opened with Canada and our European possessions of Gibraltar and Malta. It has subsequently been extended to the principal British colonies, including the whole of Australia. Important improvements were also made in the department charged with the transmission of mails. Several accelerations in one case a most important one were made in the speed of the principal mail-trains ; the number of travelling post-offices was increased ; the construction of the whole of them was im- proved ; and the apparatus-machinery, attached to the carriages for the exchange of mail-bags at those stations where the mail- trains do not stop, was called more and more into requisition. Under the Earl of Elgin, the British Post-office endeavoured to form conventions with foreign countries, the object in all cases being the increase of postal facilities. In the case of Spain and Portugal, the authorities seem to have been suc- 1 A gentleman connected with a Manchester hanking company writes to us to dispute, with great show of reason, the position here taken up. We are free to admit, from one or two instances which he gives, that the rule operated exceedingly ill to his business. No measure, however, should be judged by singular and exceptional occurrences. England and the United States. 241 cessful, and partially so with the German Postal Union. An attempt to renew negotiations with the United States calls for mention here. The advocates of ocean penny postage (of which so much was heard some years previously not only a desirable, but a practicable scheme) may thus obtain some idea of the difficulty of coming to any reasonable arrangement between the two countries. We have already stated that a former Post- master-General urged upon the Government of the United States the necessity of reduction in the rates of postage of letters circu- lating from one country to the other, but was unsuccessful at the time. 1 In 1859, the Postmaster-General of the United States (Mr. Holt) communicated to the English Department his concurrence in the principle of a reduction in the postage of British letters from twenty-four to twelve cents, providing that England would give America the lion's share of the proposed postage ! The United States' Government would agree to the change provided the new rate be apportioned as follows, viz. United States' Inland Postage 3 cents. Sea Rate of Postage 7 British Inland Postage 2 The Earl of Elgin objected to this proposal as not equitable. He argued, with perfect truth and fairness, that each country ought to be remunerated according to the value of the service it rendered, and that, whether the inland service was considered (where the three items of collection, conveyance, 2 and delivery must be taken into account), or the sea service (undoubtedly better worked and regulated with us than in America), this country had a fair claim to a larger share of postage than the 1 During the progress of one of these negotiations the following memoran- dum, written by Mr. Bancroft, American Minister, is so characteristic of his people that we are tempted to amuse our readers with its reproduction entire. Postmaster-General's First Report, Appendix, p. 83. " Approved as far as ' the rate for sea.' What follows is superfluous and objectionable. Make your rates (England) to your colonies and possessions, and foreign countries, what you please, high or low, one sea-rate or a dozen, or none at all ; one inland rate or a dozen, or none at all. What your people pay we are willing to pay, but not more, and vice versa. Our security is, that we pay what your people pay from the same place for the same benefit, and vice versa." 2 In America letters are certainly carried much greater distances, at the uniform charge of three cents, than with us for a penny; but it must be borne in mind that there are no official deliveries of letters in the United States. 242 Her Majesty's Mails. United States. As, however, an unrestricted intercourse be- tween the two countries was far more important than a nice adjustment in the division of the postage, the English Post- master-General would only press for equality, and proposed the following : British Inland Postage . . \d. or 2 cents. Sea Postage 4