HN 
 
 IC-NRLF 
 
 El SIS 
 
 o 
 o 
 
 F 
 
Mortal 
 tot Ammra 
 
 A STUDY SYLLABUS 
 
 By 
 HORNELL HART 
 
 IN THE PRESENT SOCIAL CRISIS 
 When old social and economic institutions are being abandoned; 
 
 When government control of industry has been carried to an unpre- 
 cedented degree; 
 
 When public regulation of wages and prices have been greatly ex- 
 tended; 
 
 When taxation of incomes, profits, inheritances, and luxuries has 
 been immensely increased by war necessity; 
 
 When equal suffrage seems imminent; 
 
 When prohibition of the liquor traffic is impending; 
 
 When organized labor has acquired unprecedented influence; 
 
 When extreme radicals are the controlling native force in Russia; 
 
 When a Socialistic Republic is being established in Germany; 
 
 When the British Labor Party is uniting hand and brain workers 
 on a program of fundamental economic reconstruction; 
 
 When capitalists of the Charles M. Schwab type predict the ajp- 
 proaching domination of America by the manual workers; 
 
 In such a crisis, every thinking person wants to know the rudiments 
 of the great issues up. for decision, to think these issues through for 
 himself, and to encourage others to face the social reconstruction 
 with equal frankness. As an aid to these ends, this study syllabus 
 has been prepared as the co-operative product of a number of liberal 
 thinkers. 
 
 Copies may be secured at 15 cents each, eight 
 for one dollar, or $10 per hundred, prepaid, from 
 Hornell Hart, 449 Riddle Road, Cincinnati. 
 
 THIRD EDITION 
 
' <? 
 
 ' 
 
 HOW TO USE THIS SYLLABUS. 
 
 Groups of eight to twelve people, meeting weekly, will get 
 the most out of this syllabus. 
 
 Types of groups which might well make use of the outline 
 are discussion clubs, college and high-school classes in social 
 problems, adult Sunday-school classes, and groups of soldiers 
 and sailors in service. You can help to promote thinking 
 along these lines by putting such groups into touch with this 
 movement. 
 
 Make it a discussion course, not a lecture course. One stimu- 
 lating leader may be selected for the whole course, or mem- 
 bers may be responsible in rotation for the meetings, but in 
 either case the chief feature for each meeting should be the 
 interchange of viewpoints by all the members of the group. 
 If thought-provoking lecturers can be secured, a possible ar- 
 rangement is to devote half or three-quarters of an hour to 
 the lecture before a large audience, and divide up into small 
 groups for an hour of intimate discussion. Debate on ques- 
 tions suggested for original thought should be emphasized. 
 
 References printed in bold-face should be read, if possible, by 
 every member of the group. Other references may be di- 
 vided up among the members, each reporting briefly the es- 
 sence of his reading. If members can devote no time to 
 outside reading, a mere reading of the syllabus and the dis- 
 cussion growing out of it will be decidedly worth while. 
 
 Ask the librarian at your public library to reserve on a spe- 
 cial shelf the books and periodicals referred to in the syllabus 
 so that members of your group can locate them easily. 
 
 If the course is too long for your group, take up the first 
 two and the last two sections, with such of the intervening 
 sections as seem to your group most important. 
 
 When you have finished the course as a member, become an 
 officer in the army of thought by. starting a new group. You 
 will get more out of H the -second time, as leader, than you 
 did the first as pupiL ;.;/;;; ; . 
 
I. BASIC PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL^ jrs 
 
 After the war, out of the broken traditions, precedents and 
 institutions of the past, and out of the emergency machinery 
 which the war has created in government and industry, a 
 new social order must be built. What sort of an order this 
 should be, is the question which this syllabus proposes to 
 study. 
 
 A. As a possible area of agreement which our study may ac- 
 cept as a basis for the new order, certain principles evolved 
 by leaders in social, religious and labor organization work 
 are presented herewith for discussion: 
 
 1. Every child should, without his own gainful labor, be 
 assured adequate nourishment, wholesome housing, suffi- 
 cient clothing, skilled medical care, normal family life, 
 and such education and recreation as shall develop his 
 maximum capacity for joyous living, and his greatest 
 serviceability to society. 
 
 2. Adequate incomes should be assured normal families 
 up to a reasonable size limit, by one or more of three 
 methods: a. Every able-bodied and able-minded father 
 of a family should be guaranteed the opportunity to earn 
 an income sufficient to assure such a standard of living 
 to his children, and to their mother; b. Some form of 
 maternity benefit should be provided for the support of 
 mothers and children; c. An increased amount of goods 
 and services might be provided freely by the government. 
 
 3. The opportunity to earn at least enough to maintain 
 physical and moral health should be assured to all able- 
 bodied and able-minded workers. 
 
 4. For workers mentally incompetent to earn a decent 
 living, and for women mentally unfit for motherhood, 
 cheerful institutional or supervisory care should be pro- 
 vided, with provision against reproduction of those whose 
 defects are hereditary. 
 
 5. Catastrophies, such as sickness, injury, invalidity, old 
 age, death, and unemployment, should be prevented or 
 postponed by all the resources of medical and social sci- 
 ence, and when they do occur, the resulting economic loss 
 should be borne, not by the worker and his dependents, 
 but by the community, under provisions calculated to en- 
 courage prevention of such catastrophies, and to maintain 
 the self-respect of the victims. 
 
 6. The conditions of employment should be so adjusted as 
 first to secure the health and maximum welfare of the 
 workers, and second to attain the largest product con- 
 sistent with that welfare. 
 
 7. The control of industry should be democratized. 
 
 3 
 
 393921 
 
B. The following quotations indicate the widespread accept- 
 ance of these axioms i 
 
 1. The War Labor Conference Board (including five of 
 the largest employers in the nation, five officers of labor 
 unions with over 1,000,000 members, Frank P. Walsh, and 
 Wm. H. Taft) states among its priciples for the arbitra- 
 tion of all labor disputes: 
 
 The right of all workers to organize in trade unions and to bargain 
 collectively through chosen representatives is recognized and affirmed. 
 The right of all workers, including common laborers, to a living wage 
 is hereby declared. In fixing wages, minimum rates of pay shall be 
 established which will insure the subsistence of the worker and his 
 family in health and reasonable comfort. 
 
 These principles were officially endorsed by President Wil- 
 son on April 8, 1918. 
 
 2. J. Ogden Armour testified in the recent stockyards 
 wage hearing: Q. "You want your laborers to have 
 enough to live properly, Mr. Armour?" A. "Naturally." 
 Q. "And you are willing for the arbitrator to fix wages 
 which will make decent living possible?" A. "Of course." 
 
 3. Mr. A. Parker Nevin, general counsel of the National 
 Association of Manufacturers, is quoted as saying: "We 
 want wage determinations based on a scientific and human 
 groundwork, not on caprice or brutality." 
 
 4. Among the essentials of a brief war-time program ad- 
 vocated by the Federal Childrens' Bureau are the follow- 
 ing: 
 
 Public health nurses and suitable medical attention; care of babies 
 by their own mothers under decent home conditions; adequate living 
 incomes; family allowances for soldiers' families; mothers' pensions 
 for civilians; enforcement of child labor laws and full schooling; 
 recreation for children and youth, abundant, decent, protected from 
 any form of exploitation. 
 
 5. Rev. John A. Ryan, of the Catholic University of 
 Washington, in his "A Living Wage," says: "The right 
 to a family living wage belongs to every adult male la- 
 borer." (p. 120.) 
 
 6. The Federal Council of the Churches of Christ in 
 America, including the bulk of all the protestant churches 
 in the United States, is committed to a platform which 
 includes the following: 
 
 The fullest possible development of every child; the right of all men 
 to the opportunity for self -maintenance; suitable provision for the 
 old age of the workers, and for those incapacitated by injury; con- 
 servation of health; protection of the workers from dangerous 
 machinery, occupational diseases and mortality; reduction of hours 
 of labor to the lowest practicable point; the right of employers and 
 employes alike to organize; a living wage as the minimum in every 
 industry, and for the highest wage that each industry can afford. 
 
7. The program proposed for the British Labor Party, on 
 Labor and the New Social Order, includes this statement: 
 "The first principle of the Labor Party * * * is the 
 securing to every member of the community, in good 
 times and bad alike (and not only to the strong and for- 
 tunate), of all the requisites of healthy life and worthy 
 citizenship." 
 
 8. The executive council of the American Federation 
 of Labor holds that 
 
 Every worker has a right to a just portion of the wealth which he 
 helps to create, a full right to earn out of his toil an opportunity 
 for his children equal to that of any citizen, a full right that every 
 just safeguard shall be afforded him for his physical safety, for his 
 health and comfort while at work. Every worker has the right to 
 compensation for physical injury or disease occasioned in the course 
 of production * * (and) the additional right to opportunity 
 
 for rehabilitation. 
 
 C. Opposition to social insurance has been voiced by some 
 employers' and trade union organizations; opposition to pre- 
 vention of the propagation of the unfit has been expressed by 
 some Catholics; and item A, 1, is opposed by employers of 
 child labor. General opposition to all the planks may be ex- 
 pected from persons of individualistic philosophy. 
 
 D. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. How would you modify the principles set forth under 
 
 1. A, in order to make them represent truly your own con- 
 ception of the minimum requirements of social justice? 
 
 2. How many of the I, A, principles are necessarily in- 
 volved in the War Labor Conference Board's principles? 
 
 3. Compare the standards established by the government 
 in the care of the United States soldiers and their fami- 
 lies, with the ideals set forth in this section. 
 
 E. Suggested readings. (Read especially the bolf-face ref- 
 erences. Dip into the others, or ask each member of the 
 group to read and report on one.) 
 
 Labor and the New Social Order: New Republic, Feb. 16, 
 1918, Pt. II, or Monthly Review, U. S. Bur. Labr, Stat., 
 Apr., 1918, pp. 63ff. 
 
 Social Standards of the Love joy "Committee of the Na- 
 tional Conference of Charities, Proceedings 1912 (Cleve- 
 land), pp. 388-395. 
 
 The Church and Social Service in the U. S. H. F. Ward. 
 1914. Pp 148-184. (Fleming H. Revell, 50 cents.) 
 
II. HOW FAR DOES AMERICA FALL SHORT OF 
 SOCIAL JUSTICE? 
 
 The principles set forth in Section I, so widely accepted by 
 church and state, and in part by labor and capital, cannot be 
 realized by a return, after the war, to the social status quo 
 ante. 
 
 A. The following facts indicate the extent of our failure to 
 maintain in the United States the principles of social justice 
 outlined in I, A: 
 
 1. A large proportion of the children in the United States 
 do not receive the living outlined on page 3: 
 
 a. "There are in the city of New York at the present 
 time (December, 1917) 216,000 children who are seri- 
 ously undernourished, and another 611,000 who are 
 only in passable condition, or who may be recorded as 
 'borderline cases/ ' From the report of an official sur- 
 vey made by the Department of Health of New York 
 City, in which 171,000 public school children were ex- 
 amined. The seriously undernourished were 21 per 
 cent of all the children examined. 
 
 b. A study by the City Club of Milwaukee found that 
 40 per cent of the children under working age in that 
 city come from families with incomes too small to pro- 
 vide a wholesome living. 
 
 c. As to education, Ayers shows (Laggards in Our 
 Schools, p. 65) that only half of the children in our 
 city schools reach the eighth grade, and only one-tenth 
 reach the last year of high school. Many of the 
 brightest and most of the dull children leave school 
 at 14 to 16 years of age to go to work. 
 
 d. Chapin found that in New York City, in 1907, 
 among families with incomes of $800 to $900, 22 per 
 cent were undernourished, 32 per cent underclothed, 
 and 53 per cent overcrowded. In lower income groups 
 conditions were radically worse. Yet food prices have 
 increased since 1907 so that today $1,500 would be re- 
 quired to purchase the food which $850 would secure 
 when Chapin made his study. 
 
 2. Between 25 and 50 per cent of the married men in the 
 United States earn too little to provide for their families: 
 
 a. The United States Immigration Commission re- 
 ported that, among wage-earners' families, 43 per cent 
 of those with native-born heads, and 66 per cent of 
 those with foreign-born heads, had incomes of less 
 than $750 in 1908, including contributions made by 
 wives, children and boarders. 
 
b. The Federal Children's Bureau found (1914-1916) 
 in its survey of Baltimore, Waterbury, Akron, and 
 Manchester, that 39 per cent of the fathers of babies 
 born in these cities earned less than $650 in the year 
 following the baby's birth. 
 
 c. In the states of Massachusetts, Ohio, and California, 
 official reports show that 55 per cent of the male wage- 
 earners 18 years of age and over earned, when steadily 
 employed in manufacturing, less than $15 weekly, or 
 less than $780 yearly in 1915. Wages in other indus- 
 tries in Ohio (and undoubtedly elsewhere) average 
 practically the same as in manufacturing. 
 
 d. Father Ryan says: "The universal application of 
 the Living Wage principle * * * would mean an 
 increase in various degrees in the remuneration of 
 more than 60 per cent of the male adults employed in 
 urban occupations." (Op. cit., p. 328.) 
 
 e. Recent wage and cost of living inquiries are practi- 
 cally unanimous that, during the world war, the cost 
 of living has increased faster than average wages. 
 
 3. A large proportion of women workers earn less than 
 enough to maintain health and decency. In Ohio, in 1915, 
 more than half of the factory and sales women 18 years 
 old and over earned less than $8 a week. Of stenog- 
 raphers and clerks, one-third earned less than $9 a week. 
 The minimum cost of living for women, as determined by 
 wage boards in other states before the war, was from $8 
 to $10. 
 
 4. The terrific casualties of industrial life run vastly be- 
 yond the unavoidable minimum. Hundreds of millions of 
 dollars in wages lost through sickness, 100,000 young 
 mothers widowed each year, and from one to six and a 
 half million workers unemployed at a given time, are 
 among the preventable catastrophies of industrial life in 
 the United States. 
 
 5. Fire hazards, dust, wetness, industrial poisons, excessive 
 hours, and destructive strain are still prevalent in Ameri- 
 can industry, though such conditions are steadily being 
 eliminated. 
 
 B. On the other hand, it should be noted that real wages and 
 sanitary standards are decidedly higher in the United States 
 than in Europe, and immensely higher than in Asia. 
 
 C. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. Define the minimum justifiable standard of living in 
 terms of real income what kind of a house, what kind 
 of food, what kind of clothing, what degree of medical 
 
care, what kind and amount of education and recreation, 
 should be insisted on as a minimum? Should a minimum 
 day's work be defined and insisted on as a corollary? 
 
 2. Collect and turn in references to facts bearing on the 
 extent to which social justice is realized in America, com- 
 pared with the ideals outlined on page 3, and compared 
 also with pre-war conditions in Europe and Asia. 
 
 3. In a democratic system of education, what factors 
 should determine how great the opportunity of a pupil 
 shall be? Is our educational system democratic? 
 
 4. What are the functions of charity in the elimination of 
 social injustice? 
 
 D. Suggested readings: 
 
 Conditions of Labor in American Industries. Lauck and 
 Sydenstricker 1917. Pp. 29, 43, 61, 116, 141, 195, 217-219, 
 357-383. (Funk & Wagnalls, $1.75.) 
 
 Fluctuations of Unemployment in Cities of the U. S. 
 
 Hornell Hart, 1915. Pp. 48-57. (Trounstine Foundation, 
 
 Cincinnati, 25 cents.) 
 
 People of the Abyss. Jack London, 1903. (Macmillan, 
 
 $1.50.) 
 
 How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis, 1899. (Scrib- 
 
 ner's $1.50.) 
 
 Poverty. Robert Hunter, 1904. (Macmillan, $1.50.) 
 
 The Jungle. Upton Sinclair, 1906. (Doubleday, Page, 
 
 $1.50.) 
 
 Misery and Its Causes. Edward T. Devine. 
 
 III. CONSERVATIVE REMEDIES FOR MISERY: 
 ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY. 
 
 Certain groups believe that the world's greatest need after 
 the war, as before it, will be to produce the largest possible 
 amount of wealth, and to waste the smallest possible amount. 
 
 A. Wastefulness, extravagance, and intemperance of the 
 poor, seem to many chief causes of poverty and social malad- 
 justment. Thrift and temperance are therefore urged as 
 remedies. 
 
 1. In favor of this point of view, it is urged: 
 
 a. That the liquor bill of the United States is nearly 
 two billion dollars a year. 
 
 b. That the average American family is said to waste 
 enough to feed a European family. 
 
 c. That the poor buy expensive cuts of meat and other 
 food luxuries, spend excessively for amusements, and 
 
 8 
 
use their money extravagantly in prosperous times 
 with no thought for the future. 
 
 d. That use of alcohol greatly reduces the efficiency 
 of workers. 
 
 2. Further study of this problem brings out these addi- 
 tional facts: 
 
 a. A government survey in Washington, D. C., in 1916, 
 found that the lowest expenditure at which any of 31 
 families intensively studied attained anything like a 
 balanced and adequate ration, was 40 cents for food 
 per day per equivalent of an adult male. Yet, out of 
 2,000 representative families, with incomes up to 
 $2,000 a year, two-thirds spent less than this essen- 
 tial amount. Not waste, but inadequate income was 
 the dominant factor. (Mo. Rev. U. S. Bur. Labr. Stat. 
 V. 836-8, 1080-1.) 
 
 b. Two separate studies of expenditures for liquor, one 
 by the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the other 
 by the New York City Health Department, both 
 showed that liquor expenditures average very much 
 less in families with small incomes than in families 
 better able to spare the money. Exceptions, of course, 
 occur. 
 
 c. Every study of family budgets finds that in families 
 with small incomes the great bulk of the money goes 
 for food, rent and clothing, while very little is spent 
 for recreation, health, or other dispensable items. As 
 incomes increase beyond the poverty line, the relative 
 importance of non-essentials in the average budget in- 
 creases rapidly. Extravagance and luxury, according 
 to the most reliable statistics, are in general character- 
 istic of the well-to-do, not of the poor, though here 
 again exceptions occur. 
 
 B. Maulthus, his followers, and recent advocates of family 
 limitation, urge self-restraint or contraception as remedies 
 for poverty. 
 
 1. In favor of this position they assert: 
 
 a. That India and China are proofs of the extreme 
 poverty which results from over-population. 
 
 b. That the largest families tend to suffer most from 
 poverty. In Milwaukee it was found that the average 
 size of families with inadequate incomes was 5.2 per- 
 sons, while for other families the average was only 4.4. 
 
 c. That children of large families tend to suffer in 
 health and vitality. 
 
 9 
 
2. In opposition to family limitation it is urged: 
 
 a. That contraception is contrary to natural law. 
 
 b. That family limitation encourages abortion. 
 
 c. That the educated and intelligent practice it, while 
 the ignorant do not, thus diminishing the good stock, 
 and multiplying the inferior. 
 
 C. More effective utilization of natural resources is urged: 
 
 a. The Department of Agriculture estimates that 70 
 per cent of the arable land (including grazing land) is 
 not under cultivation. 
 
 b. Waterways, it is asserted, have fallen into disuse 
 because of discriminatory rates devised by the rail- 
 roads to discourage river traffic. 
 
 c. Water powers and other natural resources are not 
 adequately conserved and developed. 
 
 D. Conservation of human resources is urged, on the grounds 
 that: 
 
 a. Every worker or potential worker who dies or is in- 
 capacitated before the end of his productive life, repre- 
 sents a loss of labor power equal to what he would 
 have produced above the cost of his maintenance. 
 
 b. Unemployment and sickness cause the loss, on the 
 average, of ten per cent of our labor power. 
 
 E. Scientific management of our industries is urged. 
 
 1. Its advocates point out: 
 
 a. That industrial processes are operated at only a 
 fraction of their possible efficiency, because of lack of 
 scientific analysis and planning of work, lack of enthu- 
 siasm on the part of the workers, and deliberate limi- 
 tation of output by workers; that it would be to the 
 mutual advantage of employer and employe to work 
 together intelligently to eliminate inefficiency, and that 
 wages adequate to abolish poverty would result. 
 
 b. That competitive advertising and marketing, dupli- 
 cating and parallelling of railroads, telephones, retail 
 stores, retail deliveries, etc., are wasteful, and that the 
 getting of food from producer to consumer is needless- 
 ly expensive. 
 
 2. Scientific management as an adequate remedy under 
 private ownership, is opposed on various grounds: 
 
 a. That the slacking of workers is due to past expe- 
 rience of the cutting of piece-rates by employers as 
 soon as processes had been speeded up, and that the 
 
 10 
 
same exploitation will occur in new forms under scien- 
 tific management. 
 
 b. That scientific management tends to require exces- 
 sive speed in work. 
 
 c. That it tends to break down labor organization, and 
 thus leave the workers unprotected. 
 
 F. Abolition of war is a most urgent requirement if national 
 incomes are to be adequate to abolish misery. If militarism 
 prevails, the cost of standing armies and navies, and the ex- 
 pense and destruction of recurring wars, will tend to absorb 
 a large share of the surplus above bare necessities. 
 
 G. General criticisms : Although it is agreed by all that great 
 wastes and huge inefficiencies exist, and should be remedied, 
 many social thinkers contend that economy and efficiency are 
 not primary but secondary. They urge: 
 
 1. That unemployment, wasteful advertising and market- 
 ing, disuse of rivers and canals, speculative holding of idle 
 land, destruction of crops to increase prices, slacking by 
 workers, and other forms of inefficiency, are due funda- 
 mentally to an individualistic competitive system of indus- 
 try, organized for private profit rather than for the gen- 
 eral welfare. 
 
 2. That as long as industry is autocratically owned and 
 managed, with the owners allowing labor as small a share 
 of the product as possible, labor will refuse to co-operate 
 enthusiastically in promoting efficiency. 
 
 3. That war, the greatest waste of all, is due to the selfish 
 economic competition of individualistic nations. 
 
 4. That the present income of the United States, if it were 
 justly distributed, is large enough, under conditions of 
 permanent peace, to make decent living possible for all: 
 
 a. The total income of the United States is now, ac- 
 cording to the Bankers Trust Company of New York 
 City, 50 billion dollars, or $2,200 per family per year. 
 
 b. In 1910, when the total national income was 30.5 
 billions, the income paid to property holders in ground 
 rent and interest amounted to 7.8 billions, or about 
 $400 for each family in the United States. The total 
 savings of the country were two billions, or only $100 
 per family. (W. I. King, Wealth and Income of the 
 People of the U. S., pp. 132 and 158.) 
 
 c. The amount of money which the incomes of poor 
 families in the United States were short of the 
 amounts needed to make normal living possible, was 
 roughly about 1.5 billions a year in 1910, or about one- 
 
 11 
 
fourth of the property income minus savings. In 
 other words, the poverty deficit could be met without 
 touching existing wages or salaries, without diminish- 
 ing savings, and with the bulk of existing ground rent 
 and interest still intact. 
 
 5. That, although our national income is large enough, 
 even now, practically to abolish poverty, a vastly dispro- 
 portionate share of it goes to a favored minority of the 
 people : 
 
 a. The Bankers Trust Company of New York City esti- 
 mates that ten million poor families and individuals 
 have average incomes of $700 a year, while ten thou- 
 sand rich families and individuals have average yearly 
 incomes of $275,000. 
 
 b. Wilford I. King estimates that in 1910, the richest 
 2 per cent of the families and individuals in the United 
 States received as much income as the poorest 40 per 
 cent. 
 
 H. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. What effects upon efficiency of production has the 
 method of determining the worker's share of the product? 
 
 2. As means toward the abolition of poverty, which is 
 most important: increasing the total product of industry, 
 or arriving at a juster distribution of the product already 
 being produced? 
 
 3. Compare the advantages of competition in stimulating 
 effort and initiative, with its wastes and inefficiencies. 
 
 4. How can the wastes of the rich be eliminated? 
 
 5. Discuss the relative importance of prevention of future 
 wars as compared with other items in a program of 
 efficiency and economy. 
 
 I. Suggested readings: 
 
 Scientific Management and Labor. Robert F. Hoxie, 1915. 
 
 Pp. 7-19 and 123-136 (D. Appleton, $1.50), or the Survey, 
 
 35:673-680. 
 
 Wealth and Income of the People of the U. S. W. I. King, 
 
 1915. Pp. 79, 158, 224-229, and 238-255. (Macmillan, 
 
 $1.50.) 
 
 Scientific Management and the Railroads. Louis D. Bran- 
 
 deis, 1911. (The Engineers' Magazine Co., N. Y. C., 
 
 $1.50.) 
 
 Labor's Share of the Social Product. Basil M. Manley. 
 
 Annals of the American Academy, 69:128-132. 
 
 The High Cost of Living. Frederic C. Howe, 1917. Pp. 
 
 86-102. (Scribner's, $1.50.) 
 
 12 
 
Birth Control. S. A. Kopf. Survey, 37:161-165. 
 
 Other People's Money. Louis D. Brandeis, 1913. Pp. 162- 
 
 207. (Fredr. A. Stokes, $1.00.) 
 
 Social Control of the Acquisition of Wealth. Edw. C. 
 
 Hayes. Am. Econ. Rev., 8:Sup. 194-211 (March, 1918). 
 
 IVo CONSERVATIVE REMEDIES FOR MISERY: 
 SOCIAL INSURANCE. 
 
 A. Workmen's Compensation for industrial accidents has be- 
 come an accomplished fact in 37 states. Payments in one 
 year to injured workmen and their families have been, in 
 Ohio, $2,000,000; in Minnesota, $400,000; in Massachusetts, 
 $1,200,000; in New York State, $2,500,000; with proportion- 
 ately large amounts in other states. The Safety First move- 
 ment, stimulated largely by workmen's compensation laws, is 
 saving approximately 4,000 lives annually. Yet industrial 
 accidents still kill 25,000 men a year, and permanently injure 
 125,000. Non-industrial accidents, which are not covered by 
 workmen's compensation, cause three times as many deaths. 
 
 B. Health Insurance. 
 
 1. In favor of Health Insurance it is urged: 
 
 a. That the tremendous wage loss caused by sickness 
 should be borne by industry as a whole, not by the in- 
 dividual victims. The wage loss from sickness in this 
 country is estimated by the National Industrial Con- 
 ference Board at between half and three-quarters of a 
 billion dollars a year, though that board opposes health 
 insurance. 
 
 b. That sickness is responsible for a large proportion 
 of the applications for charity. 
 
 c. That the medical service included in health insur- 
 ance will greatly reduce the extent and duration of 
 sickness, and that the desire to secure lower rates will 
 stimulate preventive measures by both employers and 
 employes. 
 
 2. In opposition it is urged: 
 
 a. That the self-reliance and thrift of workers would 
 be discouraged. 
 
 b. That the cost of the plan is too great for practica- 
 bility. 
 
 c. That a campaign of prevention should be substituted. 
 
 d. That the interests of doctors, unions, lodges, and 
 private insurance companies might suffer. 
 
 e. That the compulsory feature is contrary to Ameri- 
 can ideals. 
 
 13 
 
C. Widowhood is our most serious catastrophe. Nearly 100,- 
 000 married men under 45 years of age die each year in the 
 United States. The majority of these leave their wives with 
 children too young to work. Of the married men who die, one- 
 third are victims of tuberculosis. Accidents, heart trouble, 
 and pneumonia are other leading causes. A large fraction of 
 the deaths from such causes are preventable. 
 
 1. Mothers' pensions are urged as a means of supporting 
 the widows and children. 
 
 a. In favor of this policy it is urged that the children 
 are innocent victims of misfortune, to whom the state 
 owes protection ; that it is cheaper, and better for the 
 family to support these children at home rather than 
 in institutions, and that the mothers are rendering a 
 service to the state, for which they are entitled to com- 
 pensation. Mothers' pension laws have been passed in 
 35 states, but the funds provided are utterly inadequate 
 to provide for the cases entitled to pensions. 
 
 2. Maternity grants to all mothers are advocated by some. 
 
 a. They urge that women should not be economically 
 dependent upon men, that a man's wages do not expand 
 with the expansion of his family, that poverty in fami- 
 lies with small children is the leading cause of infant 
 mortality, bad housing, delinquency, employment of 
 mothers and other evils, and that families under this 
 plan would be safe from all types of economic catas- 
 trophe. 
 
 b. In opposition it is urged that such grants would en- 
 courage the thriftless to have large families, and would 
 thus soon reduce all to poverty through over-population, 
 that it would take from fathers the stimulus to steady 
 and energetic work, and would encourage desertion and 
 illegitimacy. 
 
 3. Socializing of life insurance, so as to cover all fathers 
 of young children adequately, has been suggested. 
 
 D. Old-age pensions are advocated by many, and are in opera- 
 tion in England and other countries. 
 
 1. In favor it is urged that men and women who have 
 labored faithfully should not be left in want or dependent 
 on charity in old age. 
 
 2. Opponents urge that such a system would be costly and 
 would discourage thrift. 
 
 E. Unemployment insurance is advocated by many. 
 
 1. In favor it is stated that inability to find work is not 
 
 14 
 
the fault of the worker, that prolonged want due to un- 
 employment frequently demoralizes the worker and his 
 family, and that such insurance might be used as a leverage 
 to promote regularization of employment. 
 
 2. In opposition it is urged that prevention of unemploy- 
 ment is vastly more important, that such insurance would 
 stimulate idleness, that workers should themselves save 
 in advance for such emergencies. 
 
 F. For original thought and discussion : 
 
 1. What arguments, for and against, are equally applicable 
 to all types of social insurance? 
 
 2. How much of the cost of social insurance is a new ex- 
 penditure, and how much a transfer of existing expendi- 
 tures ? 
 
 3. What arguments for and against social insurance are 
 equally applicable to fire insurance? 
 
 4. To what extent are the principles and machinery of the 
 war risks insurance act, including the provision for allot- 
 ments, separation allowances, compensation for crippled 
 soldiers, and death benefits, appropriate for, and capable of 
 extension into a general system of social insurance for 
 civilians ? 
 
 5. To what extent can social insurance take the place of 
 charity ? 
 
 G. Suggested readings: 
 
 Principles of Labor Legislation. John R. Commons and 
 J. B. Andrews, 1916. Pp. 354-414. (Harper, $2.00.) 
 
 Brief for Health Insurance. American Labor Legislation 
 Review, VI, 155-238 (1916). 
 
 Some Fallacies of Compulsory Health Insurance. Hoff- 
 man. Scientific Monthly, 4:306-316 (April, 1917). Re- 
 prints of this can probably be secured from the Prudential 
 Life Insurance Company. 
 
 Compulsory Health Insurance. Thomas H. Simpson. Re- 
 view of Reviews, 55:414-416. 
 
 Capital and Labor (objections). Survey, 37:495-496 
 (1917). 
 
 Mothers on the Payroll. Sherman M. Craiger. Review of 
 Reviews, 52:81-84. 
 
 Soldiers' Insurance. Survey, 38:435-437, 504-505, 541-544. 
 For more extended reading, see Social Insurance, by Henry 
 R. Seager, by Robert M. Woodbury, or by I. M. Rubinow, 
 or Unemployment Insurance, by I. G. Gibbon. 
 
 15 
 
V. CONSERVATIVE REMEDIES: 
 WAGE AND PRICE BARGAINING. 
 
 A. Trade unions and some industrial unions are the organized 
 attempt of the workers to better their own bargaining power. 
 
 1. In favor of unionism it is urged: 
 
 a. That the individual worker is at a hopeless disadvan- 
 tage when he drives a bargain with a great corporation, 
 and hence that collective bargaining is essential. 
 
 b. That real betterment of wages and working condi- 
 tions can come only through collective economic action 
 of the workers themselves. 
 
 c. That the defects of unionism, such as violence, re- 
 striction of output and the like, are forced on the 
 workers by the tactics of the employer. 
 
 d. That the membership, and hence the possible effec- 
 tiveness of trade unions is swiftly growing, and that 
 the A. F. of L. has announced its intention of making 
 increased efforts to organize the unskilled. 
 
 2. In opposition, conservatives urge: 
 
 a. That unions are selfish and despotic in their use of 
 power against the employer, the public, and other 
 workers. 
 
 b. That they deliberately limit the amount of work done. 
 
 c. That their regulations hinder the introduction of 
 labor-saving machinery and methods, and are vexatious 
 and irritating. 
 
 d. That strikes are accompanied by violence and de- 
 struction of property. 
 
 3. By radicals, unionism is criticized on the grounds: 
 
 a. That the great majority of the poorly paid workers 
 are not helped by the unions. In 1900 only 4 per cent 
 of the wage-earners in the United States were union 
 members. In 1910 it has increased to 7 per cent, but 
 even allowing for a doubling of membership in the past 
 eight years, 85 per cent of the wage-earners are still 
 not unionized. 
 
 b. While prices of food increased 39 per cent from 1907 
 to 1916, weekly wages of union men increased only 19 
 per cent, so that a week's union wage would buy 20 per 
 cent less food in 1916 than in 1907. (Bui. U. S. Labr. 
 Stat. No. 214, p. 24.) 
 
 16 
 
B. Government regulation of wages and prices is a means of 
 adjusting the distribution of income. 
 
 1. As instances may be quoted the following: 
 
 a. The Food Administration has unquestionably pre- 
 vented a high speculative rise in some prices. 
 
 b. Government rulings have brought wage increases in 
 the stockyards, on the railroads, and elsewhere. 
 
 c. Minimum wage boards have decidedly increased 
 wages for women in some states. 
 
 2. However: 
 
 a. The recent railroad wage increase aimed simply to 
 cover the increase in cost of living since 1915, without 
 attempting to remedy the huge inadequacy of wages 
 which existed at old price levels. 
 
 b. Higher wages on railroads and at the stock yards 
 mean higher freight rates and meat prices. 
 
 C. Shutting off immigration reduces, for the United States, 
 the supply of labor, increases average productivity per worker, 
 and betters the bargaining power of the workers. Its effects 
 on the world at large are more obscure. 
 
 D. Profit sharing, and benefit schemes for employes may give 
 the workers a larger share of the output. 
 
 1. In their favor it is urged that they stimulate employes 
 to take a personal interest in the success of the business, 
 diminish the turnover of labor, eliminate strikes, and in- 
 crease earnings. 
 
 2. in opposition it is urged that such plans are drawn up 
 in such a way as to prevent employes from joining a union, 
 from striking, or even from quitting, that they are pater- 
 nalistic and undemocratic, and that they produce a larger 
 product for the employer rather than increase the worker's 
 share in the product. 
 
 E. Monopoly prices, stock juggling, financial wrecking of rail- 
 roads, stock watering, and kindred financial crimes take huge 
 amounts from the people each year in excessive prices or in 
 money lost in investments. Conservative remedies offered for 
 this condition are regulation by commissions, dissolution of 
 trusts, publicity, and so on. 
 
 F. General objections to increased bargaining power as a 
 remedy: 
 
 1. In actual practice, labor unions, government wage and 
 price fixing, and regulation of large financial powers have 
 
 17 
 
merely helped to prevent a possible aggravation of exist- 
 ing economic injustices rather than achieved fundamental 
 improvements. 
 
 2. Unless wages and prices are regulated with reference 
 to each other, increases in wages cause increased prices, 
 while lowered prices cause reduced wages. 
 
 3. All government rate and wage determinations, and, in- 
 deed, all wage bargaining under existing economic systems, 
 must take into account the necessity for maintaining a 
 supply of capital for the industry, and therefore must 
 maintain intact the property income dividends and in- 
 terest. Thus, under private ownership of the railroads, 
 the government guarantees the earnings of the roads in 
 order to maintain dividends and attract the capital nec- 
 essary to extend and improve them. Since this is neces- 
 sary under private ownership, the proportionate share of 
 the product given to labor cannot, under, private ownership, 
 be much increased. 
 
 G. We are led thus to consider whether the present system of 
 paying land-rent and interest to the owners of land and capital 
 shall continue. Theoretically, these payments are made in 
 order to stimulate saving, and to prevent the consumption of 
 capital already saved. W. I. King shows, however, that in 
 1910, 7.8 billions were paid in ground rent and interest, and 
 only 2 billions were saved, in the United States. The reward 
 for saving was thus four times the amount of new savings. 
 Various proposals for turning all of this property income over 
 to the hand and brain workers will be discussed in succeeding 
 sections. 
 
 H. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. Discuss the justice of the following ideal of distribution: 
 "The product of industry should be divided with a view 
 solely to promoting the maximum production, to protect- 
 ing all workers, children, old people and unfortunates from 
 poverty, and to attaining for the whole community the 
 greatest possible psychic income." 
 
 2. Should government control of wages and prices be ex- 
 tended or diminished after the war? 
 
 3. If the government were to fix, for all industries, mini- 
 mum wages at a living level, and provide that these wage 
 rates should change automatically with changes in the 
 cost of living, what would be the effect upon the distribu- 
 tion of income, and on the present economic system ? 
 
 4. Discuss the merits of co-operative buying. 
 
 5. If its best possibilities were realized, how far could labor 
 unionism of the American Federation of Labor type go 
 toward the establishment of social justice? 
 
 18 
 
6. What would be the logical outcome of the present gov- 
 ernment policy toward labor? 
 
 7. What occidental policy toward oriental immigration 
 would be best for the world as a whole? 
 
 I. Suggested readings: 
 
 Organized Labor in America. Geo. G. Groat, 1918. Pp. 
 455-489. (Macmillan, $1.75.) 
 
 Industrial Relations. By Twenty Quaker Employers. Sur- 
 vey, Nov. 23, 1918. Part 2. 
 
 Principles of Labor Legislation. Commons and Andrews, 
 1916. Chapter III, Collective Bargaining, pp. 91-124; IV, 
 The Minimum Wage, pp. 167-196. (Harper, $2.00.) 
 Trade Unionism in the U. S. Robert F. Hoxie, 1917. (D. 
 Appleton, $2.50.) 
 
 Articles Against Unions: The Unpopular Review, 5:254- 
 274; 6:276-293; 8:168-179. 
 
 Other People's Money and How the Bankers Use It. 
 Louis D. Brandeis, 1913. Pp. 1-17. (Fred. H. Stokes, 
 $1.00.) 
 
 Government Price Regulation. E. R. A. Seligman. Review 
 
 of Reviews, 56:289-292. 
 
 Profit Sharing. Arthur Burritt and others, 1918. Pp. 249- 
 
 257. (Harper, $2.50.) 
 
 For Value Received. John Fitch. The Survey, 40:221 
 
 (May 25, 1918). 
 
 VI. TAXATION AS A MEANS TOWARD SOCIAL 
 JUSTICE. 
 
 A. The income tax is being increasingly used as a means of 
 placing the cost of government upon those best able to bear it. 
 
 1. Among the arguments in its favor are: 
 
 a. That the cost of maintaining the local, state, and 
 national governments, amounting, before the war, to 
 about $150 per family in the United States, has. been 
 placed on the general consumer by the tariff and the 
 general property tax. 
 
 b. That the general property tax is extremely difficult 
 to collect equitably. 
 
 c. That a graduated income tax rests entirely upon 
 those with adequate incomes, and relieves the poor. 
 
 2. The chief objection raised against high rates of income 
 taxation is the fear lest it discourage business initiative 
 and ambition. 
 
 19 
 
B. Elimination of all taxes except those on land (exclusive of 
 improvements) and adjustment of the rate of this tax so as 
 to absorb the entire ground rent, is advocated by "single 
 taxers." 
 
 1. In favor of this plan it is urged : 
 
 a. That the private ownership of land and private receipt 
 of rent are unjust, because the value of land is created 
 by nature and by the community, not by the individual. 
 
 b. That such a tax, by forcing speculators to release 
 land into use, would greatly stimulate production. 
 
 c. That unemployment and low wages would disappear 
 because of the great increase in the demand for labor 
 to utilize land now idle. 
 
 d. That the single tax would eliminate the congestion 
 which is responsible for bad housing. 
 
 e. That all the benefits of competition would be restored 
 by single tax, since it would eliminate the monopoly of 
 land, which, they assert, is the source of all monopoly. 
 
 f. That this program would achieve social justice with- 
 out interfering with private initiative or private owner- 
 ship of capital. 
 
 2. In criticism of single tax it is contended : 
 
 a. That the building and industrial boom expected as 
 a result of single tax might very likely be followed by 
 a collapse, with recurring unemployment and low wages, 
 and that the unemployed are not a constant surplus of 
 labor, but a fluctuating army, sometimes vast, some- 
 times small, which no sweeping increase in labor de- 
 mand would absorb. 
 
 b. That monopoly is due to other causes in addition to 
 private ownership of land. 
 
 c. That the pure land value of agricultural land cannot 
 be separated from the value of such improvements as 
 clearing, breaking, and fertilization. 
 
 d. That the private ownership of capital is, in practice, 
 as unjustifiable as of land, and that interest is as un- 
 earned as land rent. 
 
 e. That private competition in industry, which single 
 taxers propose to re-establish, is wasteful and damaging 
 to the interests of both the worker and the consumer. 
 
 C. Progressive inheritance taxes have been urged 
 
 1. As a means of breaking up large fortunes, of securing 
 funds to purchase for the government public utilities, and 
 of financing social insurance plans. 
 
 20 
 
a. Probably 5 to 10 billion dollars per year is inherited 
 in the United States. With such a fund, or a fraction 
 of it, railroads, mines and other basic utilities could be 
 purchased rapidly, decreasing thereby the property in- 
 come exacted from the public. 
 
 2. In opposition, in addition to arguments directed against 
 public ownership, and social insurance, it is urged that large 
 fortunes would be driven from states or nations levying 
 heavy inheritance taxes, and that if such taxes were em- 
 ployed for current expenses, the supply of capital would be 
 depleted. 
 
 D. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. How long would it take the government, through a 50 
 per cent inheritance tax, to acquire control of all the large 
 industries ? 
 
 2. What would be the outcome of a state in which the taxes 
 were all paid, without shifting, by a small minority of the 
 people ? 
 
 3. Arrange a debate between a single taxer and a socialist. 
 
 4. Assuming that public ownership of all the large indus- 
 tries is advisable, how would you advocate securing title 
 to them? 
 
 5. How would you finance an adequate system of social in- 
 surance? 
 
 6. To what extent would the reasons which led to the pres- 
 ent system of war taxes justify the application of similar 
 taxes to financing the solution of the social problems of 
 peace? 
 
 E. Suggested readings : 
 
 Taxation for Social Purposes, in State Socialism. Walling 
 and Laidler, 1917. Pp. 617-635. (H. Holt, $1.25.) 
 
 An Endowment for the State. Alvin Johnson. Atlantic, 
 115:30-35. 
 
 The Taxation of Land Values. Vetta Scheftel, 1916. Pp. 
 384-421. (Houghton, Mifflin, $2.00.) 
 
 Shall New York City Untax Buildings? C. C. Williamson. 
 Survey, 36:332-334 (1916). 
 
 Progress and Poverty. Henry George, 1879. (Doubleday, 
 50 cents.) 
 
 Final Report of the Commission on Industrial Relations, 
 1915. J. R. Commons. Federal Fund for Social Welfare, 
 pp. 389-395. 
 
 21 
 
VII. PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF LAND AND CAPITAL. 
 
 A. Many progressives advocate that the whole share of the 
 national income which now goes to owners of property should 
 go to the hand and brain workers. Ground-rent, interest, and 
 profits should, they claim, be abolished, and the funds now paid 
 to the capitalists should go to the workers in the form of 
 higher compensation and lower prices. These ends are to be 
 accomplished through public ownership and operation of all 
 the important industries, including mines, forests, transporta- 
 tion systems, factories, wholesale and retail stores. The func- 
 tion of property income would then disappear, since the state 
 itself would set aside the funds necessary for the maintenance 
 and extension of the means of production. 
 
 B. This proposal is not 
 
 1. A program for dividing up equally the existing wealth, 
 nor 
 
 2. Communism, which seeks absolute equality or even iden- 
 tity in income for everyone, nor 
 
 3. Anarchism, which seeks the abolition of all compulsory 
 or forcible government ; 
 
 4. Nor is it an attack upon patriotism, religion, or family 
 life. 
 
 C. Among the advantages claimed for public ownership as 
 above defined are: 
 
 1. That it would automatically provide adequate earnings. 
 
 2. That the state would provide adequately for all the 
 helpless and unfortunate. 
 
 3. That every child would have a fair start in life, with 
 opportunities proportionate to abilities. 
 
 4. That the wastes of competition would be eliminated. 
 
 5. That the motive for fraudulent exploitation of the public 
 would be removed, for private business, being eliminated, 
 could no longer bribe officials, manipulate stock, charge ex- 
 cessive prices, adulterate goods, nor exploit natural re- 
 sources. 
 
 6. That efficiency would be increased, since the workers 
 would be stimulated to more enthusiastic effort by the 
 knowledge that they would be producing for their own 
 benefit and that of their fellows instead of for private 
 profit. The success of the Panama Canal, and the relative 
 economy and efficiency of the parcels post as compared with 
 private express companies, are adduced as evidences of 
 possible efficiency under public management. 
 
 22 
 
7. That the substitution of public welfare instead of private 
 profit as the mainspring of industry would eliminate great 
 evils. 
 
 8. That the absence of poverty and extreme wealth would 
 eliminate large fractions of our present crime, disease, and 
 social unrest. 
 
 9. That personal freedom would be increased by the short- 
 ening of the hours of labor, by the extension and better 
 adjustment of education, by more adequate incomes, and 
 by the consideration of the worker's rights as of first im- 
 portance in determining the conditions of labor. 
 
 10. The war would be eliminated by the removal of the 
 capitalistic struggle for markets and for commercial ad- 
 vantage, and by the application of the ideals of internation- 
 al justice. 
 
 D. Among objections raised against public ownership are: 
 
 1. That it would greatly reduce the efficiency of production. 
 Opponents assert that the incentive of private profit and 
 of the ambition to accumulate income-producing property 
 and hand it on to one's children, is essential to the mainte- 
 nance of vigor, initiative and enterprise; that qualities of 
 leadership would not be developed, but that a dead level 
 of individuals unfitted for anything but a particular job 
 would result. They point to the notorious distrust which 
 democracies exhibit toward experts, to the inefficiency of 
 many city and state governments, and to the reputed stag- 
 nation in the government civil service, as evidences of the 
 inherent inefficiency of public management. 
 
 2. That it would be difficult to fix prices and rates of com- 
 pensation justly under complete public ownership. 
 
 3. That personal liberty and freedom of action would be 
 sacrificed. 
 
 4. That the evils of the present system are due to defects 
 of human nature, which no change of system would elimi- 
 nate. Under public ownership, they suggest, favoritism 
 would still be possible in promoting individuals to positions 
 of authority, in granting larger compensation, in giving 
 educational opportunities to children, and elsewhere. 
 
 5. Many radicals object that the control of industry 
 through a government bureaucracy would not be industrial 
 democracy. Government employes are not allowed to 
 unionize. Postoffice employes have been prevented by the 
 most repressive regulations from having any voice in de- 
 termining their own working conditions. The workers, 
 these objectors argue, should control their working condi- 
 tions directly, and not merely as voters in a huge electorate. 
 
 23 
 
E. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. How would public ownership of land and capital affect 
 each of the deficiencies of the present system noted in 
 Section II, pp. 6-8? 
 
 2. Compare and elaborate the arguments for and against 
 the efficiency of publicly owned and operated industry. 
 
 3. Would individuality have a better chance for full devel- 
 opment under public ownership or under capitalism ? 
 
 4. Discuss the merits of co-operative production. 
 
 5. If public ownership were accomplished on a world-wide 
 basis, would not consistency demand that the resources of 
 America be pooled with those of countries like Russia and 
 China ? How would such a proposal work ? 
 
 F. Suggested readings : 
 
 Economic Reconstruction. John R. Commons. American 
 Economics Review, 8-Sup. 5-17 (March, 1918). 
 Outlines of Economics. R. T. Ely, 1916. Chapter XXX on 
 Socialism, pp. 627-640. (Macmillan, $2.25.) 
 
 Where and Why Public Ownership Has Failed. Yves Guyot, 
 1914. (Macmillan, $1.50.) 
 
 State Socialism Pro and Con. Walling and Laidler, 1917. 
 (H. Holt, $1.25.) 
 
 Principles of Economics. F. W. Taussig, 1911. Vol. II, pp. 
 443-479. (Macmillan, $2.00.) 
 
 The Essentials of Socialism. Ira B. Cross, 1912. (Mac- 
 millan, $1.25.) 
 
 Socialism Promise or Menace. Hilquit and Ryan, 1914. 
 (Macmillan, $1.25.) 
 
 VIII. INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY. 
 
 A. That hand and brain workers should have, and will have, 
 a large and increasing voice in the control of industry is a 
 commonplace of current thought. Industrial democracy is 
 essential for the following reasons : 
 
 1. To promote efficiency. At the Westchester County 
 (N. Y.) House of Correction a gang of men recruited from 
 drunks, thieves, and vagrants, were organized into a mutual 
 welfare league, and were set to digging foundations in 
 competition with a gang of hired laborers. The contractor 
 told the warden that he would like to trade gangs, because 
 the prisoners were so much more efficient than the hired 
 men. If democracy is good for jail bums, why would it 
 not put new life into free workmen? 
 
 24 
 
2. To promote justice in distribution and in determination 
 of working conditions. It is axiomatic in law that justice 
 can be achieved only when all the interests involved are 
 adequately represented. 
 
 3. Because consistency requires that while we fight for 
 political democrcay, we shall achieve industrial democracy. 
 
 B. Industrial unionism, or syndicalism, is a form of organiza- 
 tion urged by workers in many countries as a means to indus- 
 trial democracy. They propose to organize the workers of 
 each industry in one big union, such as mine workers, or steel 
 workers, contrasting with trade unions, which are organized 
 by crafts, such as plumbers, or type-setters. Industrial unions 
 include the unskilled as well as the skilled. The syndicalist 
 theory represents a reaction against state control of any sort, 
 and postulates the substitution of industrial, direct action for 
 political action. The Industrial Workers of the World, who 
 represent the syndicalist movement in America, arose as a 
 protest against conditions existing in the western mines and 
 lumber camps. Its members have been described as "home- 
 less, jobless, voteless, womenless men." 
 
 1. By those favoring syndicalism it is argued: 
 
 a. That the state at present is controlled by a small 
 group of economically powerful men, the large capital- 
 ists, who own the newspapers, finance the old political 
 parties, and control to a greater or less extent the 
 churches and universities. That the worker has there- 
 fore nothing to hope from political action, but must 
 put his faith in industrial action where he can be 
 effective if organized. 
 
 b. That political action as the means of remedying 
 grievances is indirect and delayed, while direct action 
 (sabotage) is more speedy and effective. 
 
 c. That work should be the basic qualification for citi- 
 zenship. 
 
 d. That casual workers, who are disfranchised by mov- 
 ing about, and immigrants are entitled to a voice in the 
 control of industry, which they get through direct 
 action. 
 
 2. Those opposing syndicalism contend : 
 
 a. That such a program ignores all interests except 
 those of labor, and that the consumer as such would not 
 be represented. 
 
 b. That powerful industries, like steel production, or 
 meat packing, would secure tyrranical control over the 
 community, charging excessive prices and paying un- 
 justly high wages. 
 
 25 
 
c. That the movement is terrifically negative destruc- 
 tive of industry and of social institutions without any 
 clear constructive program. 
 
 d. That such a system would place the control of in- 
 dustry in the hands of the most ignorant and incompe- 
 tent, and that democratic control of administration 
 would make speed and freedom of executive action im- 
 possible. 
 
 e. That the I. W. W. is merely an uncontrollable agita- 
 tion, chafing against authority, with no definite or con- 
 sistent body of ideas. 
 
 C. Guild socialism is a program which aims to combine indus- 
 trial unionism, the abolition of property income, and the reten- 
 tion of the civil government. It demands that each industry 
 shall be controlled by the hand and brain workers who operate 
 it ; that the body politic of the nation shall include two houses, 
 one composed of citizens elected on a geographical basis, the 
 other of members representing the various democratically 
 organized industries. The ownership of land and capital would 
 be vested in the state thus constituted, and loaned as required 
 to the industries. This plan differs from orthodox socialism 
 in that it provides for industrial democracy; it differs from 
 syndicalism in that it retains a state, with representation of 
 the consumer, and in that it provides a higher power to adjust 
 conflicts between industries. It differs entirely from anar- 
 chism, for it proposes to maintain government in its full sense. 
 
 D. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. Draw up, for guild socialism, the arguments pro and con. 
 
 2. What essential reasons would make an industry con- 
 trolled by a board of directors elected by the hand and brain 
 workers less efficient than an industry controlled by a board 
 elected by absentee stockholders ? 
 
 3. What are the fundamental differences between the group 
 of remedies which includes economy, efficiency, increased 
 bargaining power and social insurance, and the group which 
 includes public ownership, syndicalism, and guild socialism ? 
 
 4. To what extent could trade unions be developed into the 
 units of an industrial democracy? 
 
 5. To which, if to any, of the remedies mentioned in this 
 outline, do the teachings of Jesus give support? How so? 
 
 6. Find a parallel in existing industrial organization for 
 each of the following forms of political organization : Ab- 
 solute hereditary monarchy ; benevolent despotism ; limited 
 monarchy ; the old Prussian electoral system ; republic. 
 
 E. Suggested readings: 
 
 British Labor in Wartime. G. D. H. Cole. New Republic, 
 XV, p. 140 (Junel, 1918). 
 
 26 
 
Socialism. E. C. Robbins, 1915. Pp. 169-179. (H. W. 
 
 Wilson, $1.25.) 
 
 Organized Labor in America. Geo. G. Groat, 1916. Pp. 
 
 408-452. (Macmillan, $1.75.) 
 
 Self-Government in Industry. G. D. H. Cole, 1917. (Bell, 
 
 London.) 
 
 Syndicalism, Industrial Unionism, and Socialism. John 
 
 Spargo, 1913. (Huebsch, $1.25.) 
 
 State Socialism Pro and Con. Walling and Laidler, 1917. 
 
 (H. Holt, $1.25.) 
 
 National Guilds. A. R. Orage, 1917. Pp. 132-140. (Bell, 
 
 London.) 
 
 Books on the National Guild Movement. Survey, 41-643 
 (Feb. 1, 1919). 
 
 IX. BOLSHEVISM. 
 
 The extreme of economic radicalism is represented by the pro- 
 gram of the present Russian government. 
 
 A. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the central doctrine 
 of Bolshevism. The new Russian constitution says: "The 
 power must belong entirely to the toiling masses." It is to be 
 a dictatorship "for the purpose of abolishing the exploitation 
 of men by men and of introducing Socialism." Ultimately the 
 whole population is to be included in the proletariat, for "uni- 
 versal obligation to work is introduced" with a view to "the 
 entire abolition of the division of the people into classes." 
 The revolution is to be brought about by force. The consti- 
 tution decrees that "all toilers be armed . . . and the 
 propertied class be disarmed." It also "introduces universal 
 military training." The old legal system has been abolished 
 and popular tribunals substituted. 
 
 1. Opponents state that the Bolsheviki are only a small 
 minority, ruling by terrorism ; that Russia is in a state of 
 utter disorganization and anarchy; that the constitutional 
 assembly was forcibly dispersed after the Bolsheviki had 
 obtained power on the promise of hastening it ; that social- 
 ists opposed to Bolshevism have been imprisoned and exe- 
 cuted; that more newspapers were suppressed and more 
 executions ordered in one month under Bolshevik rule than 
 in twenty-four years under the czar; and that Russia con- 
 stitutes the conclusive demonstration of the utter failure 
 of radicalism. The danger of placing complete and imme- 
 diate power in the hands of illiterate masses is pointed out, 
 and it is noted that if the mental tests used in the army 
 are reliable the average mental age of American laborers 
 is only 12 years, while enlisted men as a whole averaged 
 only 14 years in mentality. 
 
 27 
 
2. In defense of proleterian dictatorship Lenine says: 
 "The class struggle in revolutionary times has always in- 
 evitably taken on the form of civil war, and civil war is 
 unthinkable without the worst kind of destruction, with- 
 out terror and limitations of the form of democracy in the 
 interests of the war." He defends "terror . . . used 
 to abolish all exploiting minorities." Lenine argues that 
 the chaos in Russia is a heritage of the war, for which the 
 capitalistic governments are responsible. These same gov- 
 ernments, it is urged, have been doing everything in their 
 power to prevent the Bolsheviki from establishing an 
 orderly government and prosperous industrial life. Advo- 
 cates of Bolshevism point out the fact that in Vladivostok 
 in an election held under the control of the allied armies, an 
 overwhelming Bolshevist victory resulted, and that, in spite 
 of very frequent elections and ample recall provisions, the 
 Bolsheviki have remained in power longer than any other 
 present government in Europe except those in Greece and 
 England. Relative to freedom of the press, John Reed 
 asserts that the available supply of ink and paper was 
 apportioned to conservative and radical publications in pro- 
 portion to the voting strength of the groups they repre- 
 sented. A Y. M. C. A. worker testifies to the safety with 
 which relief supplies were transported and distributed 
 through Russia under Soviet protection. A group of pub- 
 licists, including Jane Addams, has issued a statement that 
 the truth about Russia is being repressed, and that the 
 Soviets are conducting an orderly government. The ex- 
 cessive terrorism of the White Guard and of anti-Bolshevik 
 forces has been ignored by the press. Max Eastman be- 
 lieves "that there is growing into maturity in that country 
 (Russia) the most just and wise and humane and demo- 
 cratic government that ever existed in the world." 
 
 B. The economic program of Bolshevism involves "the sociali- 
 zation of land . . . to be apportioned among husbandmen 
 . . . in the measure of each one's ability to till it;" the 
 nationalization of all forests, mines and water powers ; and the 
 transfer to Soviet control of all the means of production, bank- 
 ing and transportation. They apparently advocate such a dis- 
 tribution of the product as shall guarantee a subsistence mini- 
 mum to all and promote maximum production. Lenine himself 
 accepts a workman's wages, and apparently believes approxi- 
 mate equalization of income desirable. 
 
 1. Reduced production has resulted at first from this ex- 
 periment. Lenine refers to "the deadly resistance of 
 laziness and middle-class reaction and egotism." E. A. 
 Ross found a 40 to 50 per cent slump in industrial efficiency 
 under Soviet management, and predicted that the workmen 
 would soon eat up the capital of the country. Friendly 
 
 28 
 
observers have found workers sleeping at their machines 
 during factory hours, and have noted the absence of 
 authority to discharge or to execute any policy without 
 tedious committee action. It is stated that even in the 
 army committees of soldiers debated every move made in 
 battle, while in factories experts are over-ruled by the 
 vote of unskilled workmen, and, it is said by extreme antis, 
 have been murdered in great numbers. Catherine Bresh- 
 kovsky, the socialist revolutionist, claims that "the land 
 has become like a desert. Only few and small industries 
 
 2. Bolshevik leaders admit a slump in productivity, but 
 maintain that this is only a temporary reaction from the 
 speeding and exploitation under the capitalistic regime. 
 Lack of food is said to be partly responsible for lax work. 
 Lenine advocates the Taylor efficiency system under Soviet 
 control, and he is pushing a campaign to stimulate accu- 
 rate accounting, energetic labor, and increased production. 
 He demands labor discipline, for "every large machine 
 industry . . . requires an absolute and strict unity 
 of the will which directs the joint work of hundreds, thou- 
 sands and tens of thousands of people." It must be re- 
 membered also that the elimination of the rent, interest, 
 and profits charges formerly consumed by property owners 
 creates a wide margin so that even a much reduced pro- 
 ductivity might mean actually a greater income to the 
 workers than under the capitalistic regime. 
 
 C. Educationally, "the Soviet Republic sets itself the task of 
 furnishing full and general free education to the workers and 
 the poorest peasantry." Free halls are furnished for meet- 
 ings. School houses are at the disposal of committees of schol- 
 ars outside of school hours. The Bolsheviki aim to abolish 
 "all dependence of the press upon capital." Vast editions of 
 the classics are being printed for distribution at nominal prices. 
 "The right of religious and anti-religious propaganda is ac- 
 corded to every citizen" by the constitution. An unconfirmed 
 report states that local Soviets have passed edicts for com- 
 pulsory free love. 
 
 D. Foreign Relations. According to its constitution, Bolshe- 
 vism aims at "the victory of Socialism in all lands." It has 
 adopted the "policy of breaking secret treaties." It approves 
 "the annulment of loans made by the government of the czar." 
 This action has been recently reversed, however, according to 
 press reports. The Soviet Republic purposed "making all 
 efforts to conclude a general democratic peace without annexa- 
 tions or indemnities upon the basis of the free determination 
 of the peoples." 
 
 29 
 
1. Opponents argue that the Bolshevik! withdrew from the 
 war at a critical moment, freeing Germany for her great 
 western offensive, that they are attempting by civil war to 
 force their government on unwilling peoples, that Lenine 
 and Trotsky are traitorous German agents, and that the 
 repudiation of her loans is both perfidious and suicidal. 
 
 2. Friends of the revolution point out that the allies have 
 invaded Russia without declaration of war, have broken 
 their pledges by interfering in Russian domestic affairs, 
 and have ignored pleas to grant Russia an armistice on the 
 same terms granted Germany. They assert that Russia 
 sacrificed more than any of her allies, and was more ex- 
 hausted when she surrendered than Germany was when 
 she surrendered. They claim that the documents relating 
 to Lenine's and Trotsky's German connections are notorious 
 forgeries, but that even if these men accepted German 
 money they did it for use in bringing about the revolution 
 which has since occurred in Germany. 
 
 E. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. By what plan can real democracy be achieved in an adult 
 population averaging 14 years in mental age? 
 
 2. How much freedom to discuss Bolshevism should be 
 allowed in America? Should advocacy of violence be per- 
 mitted? 
 
 3. Compare Lenine's ideas of industrial organization with 
 syndicalism and guild socialism. 
 
 4. How can impartial channels of publicity be opened ? To 
 what extent are our newspapers, universities, schools, pul- 
 pits and public meetings now controlled by monied inter- 
 ests? 
 
 F. Suggested readings: 
 
 The Russian Constitution. Nation, 108:8-12 (Jan. 4, 1919). 
 
 A Letter to American Workingmen. Nicolai Lenine. Lib- 
 erator, pp. 8-11 (January, 1919). 
 
 Co-operating with the Commissars. Jerome Davis. Sur- 
 vey, 41:655-7 (Feb. 8, 1919). 
 
 A New Era in Russian Industry. Clara I. Taylor. Survey, 
 41:612-14 (Feb. 1, 1919). 
 
 Terrorism in Russia. Current History, VIII, Pt. II, 105-7 
 (Jan. 1, 1918) ; IX, Pt. I, 74-5 (Oct., 1918) ; 504-6 (Dec., 
 1918) ; IX, Pt. II, 78 (Jan., 1919). 
 
 The Madness of Russia. John A. Bradford. Bellman, pp. 
 239-41 (March 2, 1918). 
 
 30 
 
Bolshevism Convicted Out of Its Own Mouth. William En- 
 glish Walling. National Civic Federation Review, pp. 7-9, 
 18-19 (Jan. 10, 1919). 
 
 Bolshevik "Industrial Government." Gustavus Myers. Na- 
 tional Civic Federation Review. Dec. 20, 1918. Pp. 8-9, 
 18-19. Jan. 10, 1919, pp. 14-19. 
 
 Internal Policies of the Bolsheviki. Abraham Yarmolinski. 
 Current History, VIII, pt. I, 68-74 (April, 1918). 
 
 Lenine A Statesman of the New Order. Max Eastman. 
 Liberator, Sep., 1918, pp. 10-13 ; Oct., 1918, pp. 28-33. 
 
 Lenine and Bolshevism. E. H. Wilson. Fortnightly Rev. 
 109: 371-383 (Mar., 1918). 
 
 How the Russian Revolution Works. John Reed. Libera- 
 tor, Aug., 1918, pp. 16-21. 
 
 Russia in Upheaval. E. A. Ross. 1918, pp. 196-214 (Cen- 
 tury, $2.55). 
 
 X. WAR MATERIALS FOR A NEW SOCIAL 
 ORDER. 
 
 A. As a basis for discussion, the following constructive pro- 
 gram is offered. It is founded upon the belief that the basic 
 ideals of social justice upon which this discussion is founded 
 can very largely be realized by the simple retention and logical 
 extension of the principles adopted and acted upon by the gov- 
 ernment during the war in its dealings with soldiers and war 
 workers, and that the machinery created for applying these 
 principles may be capable of extension and perfection to deal 
 adequately with the corresponding civilian problems. It is 
 believed that such a program would avoid most of the dangers 
 of the other remedies proposed, and would retain many of 
 their advantages. Such a program would proceed on the 
 soundest evolutionary principles. 
 
 1. Social Insurance. The government has recognized its obli- 
 gation to assure to the dependents of soldiers, during the 
 absence of, or in case of the death or injury of, the bread- 
 winner, incomes adjusted to their needs, by a system of in- 
 surance and allowances. This principle of protection for de- 
 pendents should be extended to all workers and their families, 
 and the war machinery perpetuated, with improvements cal- 
 culated to adjust it to other existing agencies, as a peace 
 instrument for administering a comprehensive plan of social 
 insurance. The plans being made for rehabilitating war crip- 
 ples, should be extended to industrial cripples. 
 
 31 
 
2. Housing:. The government has recognized officially the 
 necessity for providing adequate housing for war workers. 
 Let the machinery created for this purpose develop plans for 
 adequate housing for all workers. 
 
 3. Education. Soldiers were tested mentally, and the most 
 promising, in test and in action, were given opportunities for 
 education as officers at government expense. The same prin- 
 ciple fits civilians ; educational opportunities should be adjusted 
 to the capacity of the individual. 
 
 4. Recreation. Wholesome recreation at public expense is 
 recognized as a necessity for the preservation of efficiency, 
 and the abatement of vice. This is equally true in civil life. 
 Machinery has been created for army recreation which might 
 be developed for the whole people. 
 
 5. Regular Employment. In war, between drives and in cam- 
 paigns, soldiers are retained on the army payroll so as to pre- 
 serve organization and skill, and to protect the soldier from 
 loss. The same principles apply in industry. Machinery for 
 adjusting the labor supply to the demand through labor ex- 
 changes, has been developed for war purposes. Demobiliza- 
 tion, however, brings an employment crisis of unprecedented 
 extent, with five to ten millions of workers to be transferred 
 from war to peace occupations in the United States. Govern- 
 ment work in improving and extending railroads, highways 
 and waterways, public buildings, water powers and other pub- 
 lic works, should be pushed immediately. Agricultural lands 
 now idle should be made available to returning soldiers for 
 large scale farming under government management, or for 
 intensive individual farming. The government should exer- 
 cise permanently the foresight and executive skill needed to 
 keep the full labor power of the country constantly and ef- 
 fectively occupied. 
 
 6. Wage and Price Adjustment. The war labor board has 
 established the priciple of minimum wages adequate to assure 
 the worker and his family maintenance in health and reason- 
 able comfort. Let the machinery created to carry out this 
 principle, and to assure prices calculated to maintain real 
 wages, be extended and perfected. Wages should be adjusted 
 with a decent living as a minimum, and should be arranged 
 on a sliding scale, so as to change automatically with fluctua- 
 tions in the cost of living. Industries or establishments un- 
 able to pay the wages ordered, while charging the prices fixed, 
 should be placed under government receivership, with wages 
 as the first lien on income. 
 
 7. Health Protection. A vast organization has been built up 
 to protect the health of soldiers at government expense. The 
 
 32 
 
same protection should be extended to civilians, and the or- 
 ganization perpetuated and extended to that end. Medical 
 care should be provided freely by the government for the 
 entire community, just as education is freely provided, and 
 the emphasis should be placed, as in the army, on prevention. 
 
 8. Efficiency and Economy. Steps taken during the war to 
 eliminate waste of food, fuel, and other materials, to organize 
 transportation on an efficient basis, to standardize equipment, 
 and the like, should be continued and extended. 
 
 9. Taxation. In war, the government has acted on the prin- 
 ciple that the larger incomes were as much subject to govern- 
 ment command for the good of the nation as are the lives of 
 the soldiers. This principle should be extended to peace times. 
 The costs of the program outlined above should be met by 
 heavy progressive income taxes, and taxes on luxuries and 
 profits. Interest on the war debt should be met out of this 
 fund. Confiscatory inheritance taxes should be used to retire 
 the war debt and to purchase basic industries. 
 
 10. Government Ownership. The government control of in- 
 dustry, which has proceeded so rapidly during the war, should 
 be perpetuated, and extended, but the ownership should be 
 transferred as rapidly as possible to the government, so as 
 to make possible the extinction of the interest and dividend 
 charges, and the increase of wages, and decrease of rates. 
 
 11. Industrial Democracy. The government policy of recog- 
 nizing and fostering labor unions in war work should be ex- 
 tended to all industries, both public and private. Collective 
 bargaining should be axiomatic. The control of industry 
 should be transferred to the organized workers just as rapidly 
 as is consistent with the maintenance of industrial vitality. 
 
 12. Peace Settlement. President Wilson's program of inter- 
 national justice as a preventative of future wars, of interna- 
 tional organization to preserve peace, and of disarmament to 
 release money and man power for social reconstruction, should 
 be supported with unstinted enthusiasm and energy. 
 
 B. For original thought and discussion : 
 
 1. If you do not approve of the above program, amend it, 
 or work out, as a substitute, your own plan for realizing 
 the basic principles of social justice. 
 
 2. Discuss practical methods of promoting whatever pro- 
 gram you think will meet these ideals. 
 
 3. In what respects (if at all) should the program of social 
 measures affecting soldiers and war workers have been de- 
 veloped in a more democratic manner? 
 
 33 
 
C. Suggested readings : 
 
 Resolutions on Reconstruction of the British Labor Party. 
 Survey, 40:500-504 (Aug. 3, 1918). 
 
 The Social Revolution in England. Arthur Gleason. Cen- 
 tury, 93:565-572 (Feb., 1917). 
 
 The Great Change. Charles W. Wood. 1918. (Boni & Liv- 
 eright, $1.50). 
 
 Beating the Bolsheviki. Floyd Dell. Liberator I, 41-44 
 (Feb., 1919). 
 
 XL OUR PART IN THE POLITICS OF PROGRESS.* 
 
 What can we individually do to help promote social justice in 
 America ? 
 
 A. Two contrasted conceptions of social reconstruction are 
 current: 
 
 1. The idea of sudden, forcible overthrow of existing pow- 
 ers, wholesale abrogation of existing economic and social 
 institutions, and the attempted installation of a complete 
 new social system in one piece, as exemplified in the Rus- 
 sian and French Revolutions. This method is necessary 
 where the ballot is denied or essentially curtailed, and 
 where free speech, free assemblage, and freedom of the 
 press are permanently restricted. 
 
 2. The idea of continuous evolution from one social state 
 to another, retaining at each step enough of the old system 
 to keep economic life continuously functioning, progress 
 being achieved, not chiefly by force, but by education, agi- 
 tation, and information. This idea is exemplified in the 
 development of British institutions in recent decades. Such 
 evolution is the constructive method which must always 
 be resorted to in the long run. 
 
 B. To promote her social evolution, America needs informed 
 public sentiment on social issues, and political machinery re- 
 sponsive to such sentiment. 
 
 1. The mass of the people have always had the potential 
 power to obtain justice: 
 
 a. By weight of numbers they could at any time have 
 revolted ; 
 
 *More than one session may profitably be spent in discussing this 
 section. 
 
 34 
 
b. By refusing en masse to work, they could have forced 
 reform ; 
 
 c. In democratic countries, a sufficient majority of the 
 voters can alter the government to any degree, and 
 can pass any legislation it desires. 
 
 2. That great injustice still survives in spite of these three 
 all-powerful weapons, is due to lack of inspiration, infor- 
 mation, and organization on the part of the exploited 
 masses. 
 
 C. Creating enlightened public sentiment: 
 
 1. The power of informed opinion is proved by the spread 
 of workmen's compensation, industrial sanitation, woman 
 suffrage, prohibition, and vice restriction. These and 
 other movements are winning by exerting the pressure of 
 public opinion on existing political parties and on employ- 
 ers. The progressive social war policies enumerated in 
 Section IX have resulted directly from social education. 
 
 2. Characteristics of sound public-opinion building are: 
 
 a. Impartiality it should not be controlled by any eco- 
 nomic class or interest. 
 
 b. Decentralization every point of view should be 
 worked out with the greatest freedom. The organiza- 
 tion of propaganda should be for the purpose of stimu- 
 lating, not controlling thought. 
 
 c. Facts should take the place of theories as far as 
 possible. 
 
 d. Broader and broader areas of agreement should be 
 created. 
 
 e. Leaders of thought should be reached. To convince 
 tens of labor leaders, editors, preachers, employers, or 
 legislators, is worth convincing hundreds of second- 
 hand thinks. 
 
 3. Every person who is earnestly discussing social prob- 
 lems is helping to build the future. To organize groups 
 for such study, and to promote publicity on social issues, 
 is to become an officer in the army of thought. This sylla- 
 bus aims to be a stimulous and vehicle for such discussion. 
 
 D. The politics of progress. In a democracy, orderly social 
 progress, as far as the government is involved, comes only 
 through political organizations. The progressive who wishes 
 
 35 
 
to see social ideals crystalized into legislation, must concern 
 himself therefore not only with agitation, but with parties 
 and politicians. 
 
 1. Should one work for social progress through the old 
 parties ? 
 
 a. In favor of the Republican Party, it is urged that it 
 gave birth to the Progressive movement and that pro- 
 gressive leaders are now represented in its councils. 
 
 b. In favor of action through the Democratic Party, it 
 is urged that it, historically, has tended to represent 
 the common people, and that the present administra- 
 tion has secured such legislation as the Federal Child 
 Labor Law, the Adamson Eight Hour Law, and the 
 War Risk Insurance Law, and has promoted such poli- 
 cies as the development of the U. S. Employment Ser- 
 vice, the creation of the War Labor Board, the national- 
 ization of transportation, social control of prices and 
 materials, and the protection of the rights of labor. 
 The Republican Party now takes the lead in demanding 
 a return to individualism. 
 
 c. For both it is urged that the attempt to create a new 
 major political party would prove abortive, and that 
 to take a portion of the progressives out of a major 
 party tends to throw the control into the hands of the 
 reactionaries; also that the abuses of party organiza- 
 tion are likely to occur in any party, and should be re- 
 formed, not abandoned. 
 
 2. Should the progressive support the Socialist Party ? 
 
 a. In favor of such action it is urged that this is the 
 only party with a thorough-going social program ; that 
 the other parties simply borrow as palliatives some of 
 its planks ; that the two old parties stage merely sham 
 battles in which the capitalists who finance both parties 
 are sure to win; that the party has had a swift and, 
 until 1916, uninterrupted growth, and bids fair to be- 
 come, like the socialist parties in Europe, a great po- 
 litical force; that, even as a minority party, its plat- 
 forms and its agitation have been the source of most 
 of the progressive legislation in the country ; that it is 
 far better to sacrifice temporary gains which might 
 come through the old parties, in order to build up a 
 proletarian party which can ultimately control the gov- 
 ernment; and that its opposition to war was due to a 
 conviction that that conflict was simply one between 
 rival capitalistic governments, while the proletariat 
 
 36 
 
should sacrifice only in the great class struggle which 
 cuts across national boundaries. 
 
 b. In opposition to supporting the Socialist Party, it is 
 urged that this organization advocated policies on the 
 war which would have resulted in the victory of Ger- 
 many; that it preaches class conflict, leading to revo- 
 lution, and antagonizes any efforts of capitalists or the 
 middle class toward social justice ; that its materialistic 
 philosophy ignores such vital forces as unselfish ideal- 
 ism; and that each of these characteristics arises in- 
 evitably out of the Marxian philosophy to which it is 
 committed. 
 
 3. Should the progressive help to build up a new party? 
 
 a. In favor of such action, it is urged that the old par- 
 ties are founded upon personal favoritism, not upon 
 ideals; that the Republican Party has reabsorbed the 
 Progressives, but not their principles; that the Demo- 
 cratic Party does not understand or genuinely approve 
 the progressive policies of the Wilson administration, 
 and that when he perforce steps out in 1920 a reaction- 
 ary administration is likely to succeed him; that the 
 attitude of the Socialist Party toward America's part 
 in the war has destroyed the possibilities of that party 
 as an instrument of social progress ; that the formation 
 of a new party to represent the constructive radicalism 
 of America is therefore inevitable. 
 
 E. For original thought and discussion: 
 
 1. Compare the chances which the National Party has of 
 success, with those of the Progressive Party. 
 
 2. What chances of success have the labor parties recently 
 organized in Illinois and New York ? 
 
 3. Discuss the relation of the Non-Partisan League to such 
 a movement. 
 
 4. What should be the relation of the church to the politics 
 of progress ? 
 
 5. What will be the effect on social progress of the political 
 power of the returning soldiers ? 
 
 6. Compare the causes, aims and procedure of the French 
 and Russian Revolutions. 
 
 7. What, and how important, are the functions of social 
 revolutionists in a program of social evolution? 
 
 37 
 
8. Discuss the methods of the Fabian Society. 
 
 9. What effect would proportional representation have on 
 the politics of progress? 
 
 10. What constitutional changes are needed to make social 
 justice attainable in the United States ? 
 
 F. Suggested readings: 
 
 A New Liberal Party. Harold Kellock. Century, 94:885- 
 890 (Oct., 1917). 
 
 Social Psychology. E. A. Ross, 1908. Chaps. XVIII and 
 XXII, pp. 307-323 and 346-354. (Macmillan, $1.50.) 
 
 Why Idealists Quit the Socialist Party. Nation, 104:65-66, 
 181-182 (1917). 
 
 Labor and Politics. John Fitch. Survey, 40:363-365; 41: 
 225, 264-265, 534-535. (June 29, Nov. 23 and 30, 1918, and 
 Jan. 18, 1919.) 
 
 Political Revolt in the Northwest. Charles Merz. New 
 Republic, 13:15-17, 44-46, 71-73, 121-123 (1917-1918). 
 
 Non-Partisan League and Its Independent Press. Ray 
 McKaig. Public, 22:13-15. (Jan. 4, 1919.) 
 
 Third Parties and Their Leaders. Nation, 103, pp. 27-28, 
 511-512 (1916). 
 
RETURN TO the circulation desk of any 
 University of California Library 
 
 or to the 
 
 NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 Bldg. 400, Richmond Field Station 
 University of California 
 Richmond, CA 94804-4698 
 
 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS 
 2-month loans may be renewed by calling 
 (510)642-6753 
 
 1-year loans may be recharged by bringinq 
 books to NRLF 
 
 Renewals and recharges may be made 4 
 days prior to due date. 
 
 DUE AS STAMPED BELOW 
 
Oaylord Bros. 
 
 Make 
 
 Syracuse, N. Y. 
 PAT. JAN. 2 1. 1908 
 
 393921 
 
 f <5C 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY