'•>'«^3i9"is:SuSS?^')'5sta J ; ;| . il ; '] i •] 'I ..V / UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES THE lEISH LAND LAWS THE lEISH LAND LAWS BY ALEXANDER G. [RICHEY , Q.C, LL.D. DEPUTY REGIUS PROFESSOR OP FEUDAL AND ENGUSH LAW IN THE UXIVERSITT OF DUBLIN MACMILLAN AND CO. 1880 All righbs reserved 'Et reqait & Gargantaa, qu'il instituast sa religion aa contraire de toutes autres.' PEEFACE. «2The object of this work is not to discuss ««the Irish Land Question from either an « economic or pohtical point of view, nor to £ propose any specific alteration in the exist- ing law, nor indeed to suggest that any such alteration should be made. It aims at no more than to afibrd to those who desire to study the subject prac- ^ ticaUy, in an untechnical and popular form, ^ some, perhaps useful, information upon the ^ following points : the legal theory of the « hiring of land ; the rules relative thereto elaborated by the civil lawyers and adopted by the French Code ; the rules of the English Law upon the subject ; and the i^lterations in the latter introduced into the girish Law by the Acts of the 23 and 24 ^ict. ch. 154, and 33 and 34 Vict. ch. 46 ; 388059 PREFACE. and also to suggest certain questions which must be seriously considered by those who would frame a new Landlord and Tenant Code for Ireland, or further amend the ex- isting system. The extracts from Pothier are all taken from the short treatise ' Du Contrat de Bail k Rente,* and those from the Code Napoleon from the 8th title of the Third Book ' Du Contrat de Louage,' and specific references have not therefore been appended to the text. The Acts of the 23 & 24 Vict. c. 145 and 33 & 34 Vict. c. 46, and the judicial decisions thereupon, are published in an available form in ' The Statutes relating to the Law of Landlord and Tenant in Lreland since I860,' by F. Nolan and R. R. Kane, Third Edition. A. G. R. CONTENTS. CHAPTER PAGK Introduction 1 I. Customary Tenures 4 II. Conventional Tenures 7 in. The Code Napoleon 21 IV. The French Law as to 'Amelioration ' . 26 V. Leading Principles op the French Law. 32 VI. The English Landlord and Tenant Law AS subsisting in Ireland prior to 1860 34 VII. The Landlord and Tenant Act, 1860 . . 47 VIII. The Eesults of the Act of 1860 . . 57 IX. The Irish Land Act op 1870 . . . . 62 Leading Provisions of this Act . . 66 The Bright Clauses 81 Tenant Eight 100 Questions for Consideration . . . 108 APPENDIX. Popular Errors as to Irish Law . .115 ^ rcSfTARTS 1.V UBBAR\ 'LINC THE lEISH LAND LAWS. INTKODUCTION. During the past year many articles have been written, and speeches made, advocating altera- tions, more or less extensive, in the Irish Law of Landlord and Tenant', and suggesting new legis- lation whereby the relations of the owners and occupiers of land in Ireland may be established upon a permanent and satisfactory basis. When the abolition or reform of any system of law is taken in hand, it is of the first import- ance that the enactments of the existing code should be clearly understood ; nothing is more dangerous than a partial repeal of legal prin- ciples, which leaves other rules, which are either their logical antecedents or consequences, still subsisting ; or an ill-considered reform which leaves mingled together in hopeless confusion enactments of different origin and contradictory nature. 2 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. It must be confessed that many of those who have dealt lately with this subject have failed to master the changes produced in the Irish Law of Landlord and Tenant by the Acts of 1860 and 1870, and have proceeded upon the assimiption that the law as it now exists is the same as that which subsisted prior to the former date. It is not to be expected that laymen should take upon themselves the irksome and uninteresting task of mastering the Acts of 1860 and 1870, and of en- quiring upon what principles the reforms in these statutes proceeded, and to what extent the previous law, for the better or for the worse, was thereby altered. The enthusiasm of more than one advo- cate of a reform of the Irish law has been cooled by the discovery that the legal injustice, the sup- posed existence of which had struck him as a cry- ing wrong, formed no part of the law in question, and he has been hence induced to consider the complaints of the working of the present system as wholly unfounded. It may, therefore, be use- ful to lay before the public, in a brief and popular form, the leading principles of the existing Irish Land Law ; to show how it has grown to be what it is ; how it differs from that existing in England ; upon what principles these changes have been made ; and to draw attention to the points in which the Irish Law, and the Roman and French Law upon this subject, resemble or contradict each other. It is not the object of this work to propose INTRODUCTION. 3 any specific alteration or amendment in the ex- isting law. The enquiry what the law is, and how it came to be what it is, is entirely distinct from that whether the existing law should be amended, and if so, in what particulars, and to what extent. It is needless to observe that no rule of law dealing with the contracts of owners and hirers of land is in itself objectively good or bad ; the law which is most advantageous in one society would, if suddenly introduced into another, seem unjust, and probably prove mischievous ; the good or evil effects of any law depend upon its being applicable or inapplicable to the social con- dition of the society into which it is introduced. The unreformed English Keal Property Law of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries had become simply intolerable in the nineteenth century ; but great as are the evils which arise from the unrea- sonable retention of an antiquated system, they are not greater than those caused by the introduc- tion, into a comparatively backward community, of laws constructed for a wealthy and progressive society. The question how, and to what extent, the Irish Land Law should be altered involves the consideration of both the present social con- dition of Ireland and its probable future — a very large and difficult subject, foreign to the objects and outside of the scope of the present work. B 2 THE IBISH LAND LAWS. CHAPTER I. CUSTOMARY TENURES. To avoid the false analogies which upon this subject are frequently drawn from various an- cient and modem systems of law, and the reforms which were from time to time effected in them, it is to be observed that all laws defining the rights and duties of landlords and tenants are divisible into two distinct classes, differing alto- gether in their origin, first principles, and develop- ment. The more ancient systems of law dealing with the present as well as with many other legal relations are purely customary; these are not laws in the technical sense of the term, but simply statements of the manner in which indi- viduals standing in a certain legal relation to each other have hitherto acted, and to which course of action public opinion requires that future members of the community shall conform their conduct. The custom having been reduced to writing and enforced by a sanction, becomes thus in a somewhat circuitous fashion * law ' in • the proper sense of the term ; such a system of CUSTOMARY TENURES. 5 rules when once established may be altered or expanded by an act of the sovereign authority, but it will always retain its essential character, namely, that the reciprocal rights and duties of the landlord and tenant arise by law from the relation in which they stand to each other, and neither spring from nor are referred to any contract previously entered into between the parties, but are fixed and incapable of alteration even by agreement of the parties themselves. Of such a nature was at the commencement of this century the relation of the Prussian noble and peasant,^ and at a later period that of the Eussian boyar and serf, and traces of this ancient system still remain in the English copyhold tenures. ' The Prussian peasants owned the peasant-land of an estate by as high a title as the lord held the noble-land of the same ; thus the peasants did not hold of the lord, nor was there any relation of contract between them. The lord could not eject a peasant nor remove him from off the estate, nor purchase the holding of a peasant family ; be- cause the full number of peasant hearths had to be kept up for the purposes of the conscription. The peasants did not pay rent in the proper sense of the term, but were bound to render their lords certain services, the performance of which was enforced by means other than eviction. What these means were may be easily surmised, if it be remembered that until within the last few years the nobles of Mecklen- berg retained the right of flogging their serfs. The celebrated reform of the Prussian law simply per- mitted the tenant to compound for the services to which his land was subject, and to continue to hold his own land, or the residue of it, released in future from any feudal obligation. 6 THE IKISH LAND LAWS. As customary tenures have always been of exceptional rarity in Ireland, and have within the last few years ceased to exist, we may disre- gard the first class of tenures known as customary, and turn our attention exclusively to the second or conventional class. CHAPTEE II. CONVENTIONAL TENURES. As communities increase in wealth and land ac- quires a commercial value agriculture becomes a distinct profession, and the possession of land is desired as an ordinary investment of capital. It is obvious that it is more advantageous for the farmer who desires to make profit by agriculture that he should preserve his capital intact and pay for the right to occupy his farm by allotting to the owner of the land a certain proportion of the annual produce, than that he should sink all or a large proportion of his capital in the absolute purchase of an estate. Thus the increasing wealth of a community introduces an entirely new view of the relations between the owner and the occu- pier of land ; the right to occupy and cultivate land is sold like any other marketable article ; the owner of the land endeavours to obtain the highest market value, and the tenant strives to make the most advantageous bargain possible. In such a rapidly changing state of society the xAd rules of land tenure, which represent the original relation of lord and vassal, or freeman 8 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. and serf, are found inapplicable and inconvenient,, and all classes in the community are interested in abolishing the antiquated rules of tenure and per- mitting the owners of land to let and the tenants to acquire the possession of land upon such terms as they may agree upon between themselves. In every progressive society the laws relative to the rights and duties of the owner and hirer of land tend to follow an invariable order of change ; the parties are permitted to make their own bargains; land may be dealt with as any other commodity ; the law ceases to define before- hand by fixed rules what shall be the reciprocal rights of the owner and hirer of land, and leaves to them, within wider or narrower limits, by their contract to determine as between them- selves what shall be their respective rights and duties. This alteration in the theory of the re-^ lation of landlord and tenant is only one example of the great step in legal development which is technically called the shifting of rights from the basis of status to that of contract. A^Tien this change has once taken place the Executive no longer interferes to compel men to act according to certain invariable, and often unintelligible, rules, but to enforce contracts entered into by the parties, who by their mutual stipulations have, in fact, made the law for themselves. In no contract, whether dealing with land or any other subject-matter, do the parties express in extenso all the rights and obligations which CONVENTIONAL TENURES. 9 flow from the actual terms of their agreement ; the vast majority of such rights and obligations are not expressed in the contract itself, but are annexed to it by the law ; yet they are regarded as implied terms of the contract; and rightly so,^ because the parties must be taken to have had regard to them when they entered into their contract, and also because they were at liberty (save in specially excepted cases) to have con- tracted themselves out of them. The contracts for the hiring of land, which are in ordinary use, are very restricted in niunber; and the implied terms of the contract being, or being supposed to be, well known, a very short agreement provides for a large number of cases, the specific enumeration of which would be tedious and impossible, the parties being left at liberty, if they object to the implied terms, to substitute others for them by an express contract. If the rights and obligations of the parties are referable to the contract which they have entered into, an obvious difiiculty arises if the possession of land has been given to the tenant without any definite contract having been arrived at ; it is, therefore, necessary for the law to presume or make a contract for the parties, the terms of which are enforced as if it had in fact been entered into. The discussion of the question what contract the parties ought to have entered into, and into which for the purpose of any action they are to be presumed to have entered into, led the civil lawyers to consider what were the rights. 10 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. and obligations which, in the case of the hiring of land, would have been acquired or incurred by the parties to the transaction, if they had both been honest and intelligent men and had under- stood the nature of the contract into which they entered. In prosecuting this enquiry the civil lawyers were free from the influence of feudal ideas, and founded their conclusions upon the intrinsic nature of the contract itself and the obvious principles of ethics; and the abstract contract thus developed by them became a model for subsequent legislation ; and being specifically embodied in the Code Napoleon, has widely in- fluenced European ideas as to the respective rights of owners and hirers of land. The fairest mode of drawing our attention to the peculiar characteristics of the system of land tenure in Ireland is to compare the provisions of that law with the contract to be implied in the ordinary cases of the hiring of land, as framed by jurists who were perfectly free from that prejudice in favour of landlords which has been transmitted, like an hereditary taint, through the successive generations of English lawyers. The simplest and best treatise upon the sub- ject written by a French lawyer is the tract of Pothier entitled *Traite du Contrat de bail a rente,' which has manifestly formed the basis of the sections 1 and 3, book III., chapter viii., of the Code ' Du Contrat de Louage.' The contract for the letting of lands for agriculture or pasture CONVENTIONAL TENURES. 11 is termed in the French Code * bail a ferme,' and is treated as a subsection of the chapter dealing with the general contract of hiring (' Du Contrat de Louage '). Pothier defines the * bail a rente simple ' as a contract by which one of the parties lets, and yields possession of, certain land to the other, and covenants for the quiet enjoyment thereof, subject to the reservation of an annual rent, con- sisting either of a sum certain of money or of a fixed proportion of the annual produce which he retains to himself out of the lands, and which the other reciprocally binds himself to pay so long as he shall enjoy the possession of the lands in question. The contract regarded from this point of view creates reciprocal duties and rights ; the rights of the landlord are the complement of the tenant's duties ; and further, neither party can claim his rights unless and until he fulfil his duties. The full enjoyment by the tenant of the lands demised is a condition antecedent to the right of the landlord to require the payment of his rent, and the tenant has not any right to continue in the possession of the premises unless he pay the rent. Whatever, therefore, be the date of the contract, the reciprocal duties created thereby do not come into operation until the tenant is put into possession of the premises de- mised. 12 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. By the contract the lessor is supposed to transfer to the lessee the ownership (' la pro- priete ') in the premises subject to a charge of the rent upon the interest of the lessee ; the rent is primarily a charge upon the lessee's interest, and the lessee personally bound to pay it only so long as he remain in actual possession ; and the obligation to pay the rent ceases if the lessee be deprived of the enjoyment of the premises. The duties of the lessor are stated thus, to put the lessee into possession and to guarantee him the quiet possession of the premises de- mised ; those of the tenant to pay the rent, to treat the premises in a husbandlike manner, and to surrender the premises at the end of the term in the condition in which he himself had received them. The theory of the French civilians as to the nature and recovery of rent is the point in which they are most at variance with English ideas. Their views on this matter can only be under- stood if two points are steadily borne in mind, viz., ( 1 ) that a * bail a ferme ' partook of the nature of a sale as well as of a hiring, a question dis- cussed by the Roman lawyers (Justinian's * Insti- tutes,' iii. 24). Under this apparently verbal discussion there lurks, as is often the case, a question of importance. If a lease be considered as a sale of the lands for a greater or less period, the consideration being not a sum of money but an annuity of equivalent duration and charged CONVENTIONAL TENURES. 13 npon the lands demised, the court must take into consideration all equities which could be relied upon by a defendant resisting the specific per- formance of a contract of sale. If a vendor in- duced a purchaser to give so disproportionately large a price, or a purchaser induced a vendor to accept so absurdly small a price that the disparity of the price itself was evidence of fraud, the civil law would refuse specific performance of the con- tract ; so if the rent reserved in a lease was so much in excess of the value as to be evidence of fraud, the court would allow the lessor to recover only the fair value of the premises : * Pareille- ment, de meme que la bonne foi ne permet pas au vendeur de vendre au-dela du juste prix, elle ne permet pas non plus au bailleur d'imposer par le bail la charge d'une rente trop forte qui excede le juste prix.' This principle was equally appli- cable to the case of the lessee : * Le bail a rente etant un contratcommutatif ou chacune des parties entend recevoir autant qu'elle donne, la bonne foi oblige le preneur de se charger par le bail d'une rente qui ne soit pas au-dessous de la juste valeur de la propriete de I'heritage qui lui est transfere par le bail.' It is not to be understood that in an ordinary case the court enquired as to the actual value of the premises, and fixed the rent at that amount disregarding the terms of the contract ; in case of extraordinary and dispropor- tionate excess, a disproportion produced by or in itself evidence of fraud, it disregarded the frau- 14 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. dulent rent and treated the case as an action for use and occupation. That this is the correct con- struction to be placed upon thispassage^of Pothier is shown by the following extract from the work of Merlin, who wrote with the treatise of Pothier before him : ' Quand le prix du bail n'egalerait pas la valeur de la jouissance de la chose louee> la convention n'en aurait pas moins tout son effet. En cela le contrat de louage diff^re de celui de vente. On sait que le vendeur pent faire rescinder la vente lorsqu'elle a ^te faite pour une somme au-dessous de la moitie du juste prix.' * Mais de quelque consideration que soit la le- sion dans le contrat a louage, elle ne pent pas le faire resoudre, a moins qu'elle ne soit accom- pagnee de quelques circonstances particuli^res, telles que le dol ou I'erreur. La raison en est que I'incertitude de la valeur des revenues des temps a venir pent mettre un juste equiUbre entre la condition du bailleur et celle du preneur.' ' If the rent reserved upon a contract for the letting of land had continued to be what in early times it was, a fixed proportion of the gross pro- duce of the land, the rent which the lessor would have received must have varied with the greater or less abundance of the harvest. The lessor and lessee were at first practically partners in the crop, the lessor supplying the land and the lessee the labour. When the lessor commuted • Sub V. Baox, torn. 1, fol. 707. CONVENTIONAL TENURES. 15 his fixed proportion of the crop into a fixed annual payment two equitable rules were introduced : (1) that the landlord should be taken to have cove- nanted that the annual produce would exceed the rent, and (2) that if the crop failed by any un- foreseen cause the lessor should share the loss with the lessee. The application of this principle will appear in the subsequent extracts from the French Code. The mode in which the rent might be recovered was determined by the stand- point from which the nature of the rent was regarded. Eent might be considered as either (1) an annual sum which the tenant had con- tracted to pay as the consideration for the posses- sion of the lands, or (2) as an annuity charged upon the interest of the tenant in the lands, or (3) as the share of the landlord in the annual produce of the lands, or (4) as a sum of money the payment of which was a condition precedent to the tenant's right of occupation. The landlord had, therefore, a personal action not only against the tenant and his heirs, but also against third parties in possession who had acquired it with notice of the .existence of the rent, and against their heirs for the recovery of the arrears of the rent which accrued during their possession or that of their ancestors. As to the arrears of rent which had accrued prior to the purchase of the tenant's interest by an assignee in possession, the landlord had no per- sonal action against the assignee, but he could 16 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. proceed to recover all arrears by an * hypothecary * action ; that is, he could treat the arrears of rent as a charge upon the tenant's interest, and raise them by a sale of the interest, as if he were a mortgagee for that amount. * Cette action nait de I'afFectation de I'heritage au payement de ces arrerages. L'heritage sujet a la rente fonci^re etant proprement le debiteur de la rente dont il est charge, c'est une suite qu'il soit affects au payement de tons les arrerages qui en sont dus.' The landlord had further a right, similar to the hypothec of the Scotch law, to treat the produce of the lands and property upon the lands as specifically pledged to him for the pay- ment of the rent. When the tenant, personally liable to the payment of the rent, was himself in possession, the landlord possessed a very stringent power of thus recovering his rent, which was de- fined — * une espece de droit de gage sur les fruits nes de l'heritage charge de la rente, et sur les meubles qui en occupent les logis, lequel droit se perd lorsque les choses out ete transportees hors de I'heritage, si le creancier n'en a pas poursuivi le retablissement dans le court delai qui lui est accorde. Ce droit, de meme que celui du locateur, s'etend a tous les meubles qui servent a I'exploita- tion de la maison ou metairie sujette a la rente fon- ci^re, quand meme ils n'appartiendraient pas au debiteur de la rente. C'est aussi une suite de ce droit que, lorsque les fruits et les meubles qui etaient dans l'heritage sujet a la rente en ont CONVENTIONAL TENURES. 1 7 ete deplaces, le seigneur de rente fonciere a, comme les locateurs de maisons et metairies, le droit de les suivre et de les faire retablir pour sa surete.' If the farm had been sublet, the right of the landlord did not attach upon the crops or the goods of the subtenant, but upon the interest in the lands of the tenant, namely, the rent payable under the subletting. It is necessary to observe that the right to treat the produce of the farm as charged with the rent is. entirely different in its origin from the right of distress given to land- lords by the English law. If the tenant failed to perform any of the obligations, the fulfilment of which was the condition upon which he was en- titled to the possession, his interest in the lands necessarily determined. This result followed not merely from the breach of express stipulations, such as an express agreement to build and im- prove, but also from implied covenants, as, for exanijple, for the payment of rent and the proper cultivation of the land. The interest of the tenant was not, however, summarily determined, as upon a proviso for re-entry upon breach of covenants in an English lease ; the judgment of a court was requisite to declare the tenant's interest forfeited. Courts which followed the equitable principles of the Eoman law were not likely to determine the tenant's interest unless the breach of covenants had been substantial and wilful, nor without giv- ing the tenant an opportunity of fulfilling his C 18 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. obligations. Thus, in the case of the action brought by the landlord seeking not merely pay- ment of his rent, but also an ejectment for non- payment of rent (' pour rentrer dans I'heritage a defaut de paiement '), it is observed, * A I'egard de I'autre objet de Taction, qui est de rentrer dans I'heritage a defaut de paiement de la rente, le bailleur n'y est refu que lorsqu'il lui est du plusieurs termes ; meme en ce cas le juge, avant de statuer definitivement, a coutume d'ordonner que le preneur sera tenu de payer dans un certain temps, fixe par la sentence, feiute de quoi il sera permis au bailleur de rentrer.' If the tenant paid rent and costs within the time limited, he could dismiss the action and reTnain in the farm. Whatever was the judgment, the action being essentially for the recovery of rent, he could pay the rent and costs at any time before execution and the re-entry of the landlord ; but after such execution and re-entry the tenant had no further time to redeem ('il ne seroit plus a temps d'ofirir le paiement des arrerages '). The right of the landlord being to secure the payment of his rent, or for this purpose to determine the tenancy, he was entitled to recover the farm in the same state as it was when originally let. In such a case the tenant also was entitled to the value of his im- provements (amSliorations), and an account was settled, in which he was credited with their value and debited with the rent. The re-entry of the landlord did not extinguish the personal liability CONVENTIONAL TENURES. 19 of the tenant to pay the arrears, a rule inconsis- tent with the theory that the tenant's interest in the lands was the primary security. In the absence of express agreement, a con- tract on the part of the tenant was implied that he would till the ground in a husbandlike man- ner, and keep all buildings, &c., in proper repair ; and the failure to perform these duties involved a forfeiture of his interest, and liability to the dam- ages ' resultant de ce que I'heritage vaut moins que la rente par les degradations qu'il y a faites.' This claim of the tenant for compensation for improve- ments upon the re-entry of the landlord under a judgment in an action for non-payment of rent arises from the fact that the landlord, by the form of the action which he has selected, determines the tenancy before the period appointed for its regular effluxion. If the legal relations of land- lord and tenant are referred exclusively to con- tract, a tenant who gives up the possession at the end of his term can have no claim for compensa- tion for improvements if he be merely required to give up the land in the same condition as that in which he received it ; but if a landlord himself determines an interest of uncertain duration, or one of certain duration, before the date fixed for its termination, the claim of the tenant for com- pensation for his improvements is an obvious equity. This distinction is clearly taken in the Brehon law tract known as the bfteAcb<^ corpAicbcepvA. AU&fO c 2 20 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. * If the land has been let for hire, and no time has been specified, whatever length of time he shall be upon it, whether with necessity or with- out necessity he goes, he shall leave behind the erections. If he be noticed to quit, whether it is done with or without necessity, he may carry away his erections with him. If a term has been specified, and the term has expired, he shall leave his erections behind.' — Ancient Laws of Ireland, vol. IV. pp. 132-133. 21 CHAPTER III. THE CODE NAPOLfON. The Code Napoleon is not an exhaustive treatise — merely an outline statement of the broad principles of law applicable to certain legal relations; the sections dealing with the rela- tion of landlord and tenant lay down wide general principles leaving the application of them to the executive, and avoiding any re- ference to forms of procedure. In the Code the letting of land is treated as falling under the ordinary contract of hiring ('louage'), and the rights and duties of both parties as implied from the contract into which they have entered. A few brief extracts will show that the principles of the Code are almost identical with those of Pothier. The obligations of the landlord (bail- leur) are briefly defined : ' Le bailleur est, par la nature du contrat, et sans qu'il soit besoin d'au- cune convention particuliere, tenu des trois obli- gations suivantes: (1) II doit delivrer au preneur la chose louee, et cela en bon etat de reparation de toute espece. (2) Le bailleur doit entretenir la chose louee en etat de servir a I'usage auquel elle est destinee, et par consequence il doit y faire 22 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. toutes les reparations qui peuvent devenir neces- saires. Les obligations du bailleur et du preneur sent successives; le bailleur n'acquiert le droit au prix du louage qu'au fur et a mesure qu'il procure au preneur la jouissance de la chose louee. (3) Le bailleur est tenu de faire jouir paisiblement le preneur de la chose louee.' As to the obligations of the tenant they are as follows : * Le preneur est tenu de deux obligations principales : ( 1 ) De payer le prix du bail aux termes convenus. (2) D'user de la chose louee en bon pere de famille ; le preneur devant user de la chose louee en bon pere de famille, il est evident qu'il repond des degradations et des pertes arrivees pendant sa jouissance, soit par son fait, soit par le fait des personnes de sa maison, de ses sous-locataires, ou de ses concessionaires. Le preteur devant user de la chose suivant la destination des parties, le bailleur pent, en cas de violation de cette obliga- tion, conclure soit des dommages et interets, soit fsuivant la gravite des circonstances a la resilia- tion du bail.' The right of the landlord to re- enter for a breach of contract is not therefore absolute, but depends upon the actual injury arising from the breach, and may be resisted upon equitable grounds. It is distinctly laid down that the letting is determined * par defaut du bailleur ou du preneur de satisfaire a ses engagements.' If the lands demised exceed or fall short of the supposed quantity the rent is to be propor- tionately increased or diminished. THE CODE NAPOLfON. 23 The principle that the tenant forfeits his in- terest if he fail to fulfil the covenants implied from the nature of the contract is carried to the utmost in the following passage : ' Le preneur d'un bien rural doit le garnir de bestiaux et d'us- tensiles necessaires a son exploitation, sinon il pent etre expulse : il ne serait pas admis a donner d'autres suretes du payment des fermages, car les bestiaux et les ustensiles sont exiges non seulement comme surete du payment des fer- mages, mais comme garantie d'une bonne culture. Le preneur pent encore etre expulse s'il aban- donne la culture, s'il ne cultive pas en bon pere de famille, s'il emploie la chose louee a un autre usage que celui auquel elle est destinee, ou, en general, s'il n'execute pas les clauses du bail, et qu'il resulte de la un dommage grave pour le bailleur. En cas de resiliation provenant d'un fait quelconque de preneur, celui-ci est tenu de dommage s et interets.' The obligation of the landlord to share in the loss arising from the crop is based upon the implied contract of the landlord to guarantee that the farm let is what is technically termed ' une possession utile.' The obligation to share in the loss does not, however, arise, unless the deficiency of the crop exceeds one-half of an average harvest ; and in the case of a letting for a term of years, the tenant to obtain a reduction of his rent must extend the account over the entire period of the letting, and prove a loss of more i4 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. than half of the ordinary crop, taking both good and bad years into account.' The tenant, upon giving up the farm, must leave it in the same condition as he received it in. * Le fermier sortant doit laisser a celui qui lui succMe dans la culture les logements conve- nables et autres facilites pour les travaux de I'annee suivante. Le fermier doit laisser les pailles et engrais de I'annee, s'il les a re9us a son entree en jouissance ; s'il ne les a pas rejus, le proprie- taire pent les retenir sur estimation, car il a un droit fonde en raison a ce que ses terres ne soient point appauvries.' If a tenant be put into possession of land under a contract in which the term or duration of the tenancy is not stated, it is necessary for the court to supply this defect in the agreement. The duration of a letting cannot be logically de- duced from the nature of the contract. The con- tract of hiring or letting land is essentially the same whether the term is one or a thousand years. The duration of the letting is to be inferred from the surrounding circumstances and the object with which the land was taken by the lessee. * It is clear that as an aoconnt is to be taken of profit or loss for the entire term, this rule is inapplicable to a lease for ever ; and in the case of an Irish tenancy from year to year, in which the landlord cannot evict the tenant without compensation for disturbance, it may be suggested that the tenure as between parties is of a quasi-perpetual nature, and would not therefore fall, as has been suggested by some, within the equity of this principle. THE CODE NAPOLEON. 25 In the case of an agricultural lease (d^un foTids rural) the duration of the letting is fixed by the time required to get in a harvest of the crop usually cultivated upon the lands in question. In the case of corn-land, vineyards, &c., such a letting would be equivalent to one for a year cer- tain ; but if the crop to be planted by the tenant is not an annual produce, but of a longer duration, the letting is for as many years as there are sea- sons of the crop. 26 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. CHAPTER IV. THE FRENCH LAW AS TO * AMELIORATION.' It has been already stated that neither the Civil * nor the French law recognised any right of a tenant for a fixed term to compensation for improvements ; he was simply bound to restore the lands in the state in which himself had re- ' Under the head of acoesgion, Mr. Hunter, in his volume upon Roman Law, page 132, treats the case of a contract for hiring, as creating an important exception to the general rule • omne quod aedificatur solo cedit,' and as his authority refers to three passages in the Digest, which however support his statement to but a limited extent. The first passage (D. 19, 2, 19, 4) amounts to no more than the statement that during the tenancy the tenant could remove fixtures. The second (D. 19, 2, 55, 1) deals with the case of a tenant whose ten- ancy had been determined by the act of the landlord, and the rule agrees precisely in principle with the passage of Pothier before referred to. The third passage (D. 19, 2, 61, 2) deals with the case of a tenancy in which the landlord was entitled to receive as rent a proportion of the produce, and the tenant by improvements, which he was not bound to make, had caused the lands to produce an extraordinary annual crop. In the two latter cases the nature of the tenant's right is indicated by the nature of his legal remedy. In case No. 2 he might proceed against the landlord in an action • ex con- ducto ' to recover his expenditure ; in the case of No. 3 he might defend himself against the landlord claiming a pro- portionate share of the gross produce of an 'ezceptio doli mall.' THE FRENCH LAW AS TO 'AMELIORATION.' 27 ceived them. The tenant under the Roman law, not specifically as a tenant, but as one of the • class of those who were entitled to the possession of the land for a limited period, was practically secured compensation for certain improvements by the rule which permitted him to remove such as were capable of removal, and thus to compel the proprietor to purchase such as were of prac- tical value. The mode in which this result was arrived at cannot be more clearly stated than in the words of Mons. Lesenne : ' Quand le maitre des materiaux a bati sdemment sur le fonds d'autrui rigoureusement il en perd pour toujours la propriete, parce qu'il est cense les avoir gra- tuitement alienes au profit du maitre du terrain, qu'il est d'ailleurs en faute d'avoir temerairement bati sur un sol qu'il savait n'etre pas a lui, et il n'a aucune action ni exception pour se faire indem- niser ou reprendre les materiaux, soit qu'il pos- sdde, soit qu'il ne possede pas le terrain. Telle est la rigueur du principe expose dans les Insti- tutes ; mais cette severite avait ete adoucie des avant Justinien par diverses decisions des juris- consultes et des empereurs, qui permettent au constructeur de mauvaise foi de revendiquer ses materiaux apres la demolition, s'il n'est prouve qu'il ait bati " dcmandi aniimoy'' qui obligent le proprietaire, revendiquant le fonds, a indemniser ce constructeur des depenses necessaires qu'il a faites, et qui accordent a ce dernier I'exception de dol, si le proprietaire ne lui laisse pas enlever 28 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. tout ce qui peut I'etre sans degradation, ou ne lui en offre pas la valeur veniale ' {De La Propri- 6t4, &c., sect. 99). Questions as to improvements by a tenant are considered by the French lawyers from a point of view different from that in which we are accustomed to regard them. Such ques- tions are argued by us with the object of deciding whether the tenant should be compensated for his improvements ; by the French lawyers with the object of deciding whether the tenant should be bound to restore the lands to their original condition. Such questions, therefore, are not treated in the Code under the head of the hiring of land, but as specific instances to which should be applied the general principles of accession) that is, the rules which deal with the case of the properties of two individuals having been inex- tricably intermingled by the act of one of them. The general rule upon this subject is very fully set out in the 555th section of the Code Civil : * Lorsque les plantations, constructions, ouvrages ont ete faits par un tiers et avec ses materiaux, le proprietaire du fonds a droit ou de les retenir, ou d'obliger ce tiers a les enlever. Si le proprietaire du fonds demande la suppression des plantations et constructions, celle-ci est aux frais de celui qui les a faites, sans aucune indemnite pour lui ; il peut meme etre condamne a des dommages et int^rets, s'il y a lieu, pour le prejudice que peut avoir ^prouve le proprietaire du fonds. Si le proprietaire pref^re conserver les plantations et THE FRENCH LAW AS TO 'AMELIORATION.' 29 constructions, il doit le remboursement de la valeur des materiaux et du prix de la main-; d'oeuvre sans egard a la plus ou moins augmen- tation de valeur que le fonds a pu recevoir. Neanmoins, si les plantations et constructions et ouvrages ont ete faits par un tiers evince, qui I'aurait condamne a la restitution des fonds, attendu sa bonne foi, le proprietaire ne pourra demander la suppression desdits ouvrages, plan- tations, et constructions, mais il aura le choix ou de rembourser la valeur des materiaux et du prix de la main-d'oeuvre, ou de rembourser une somme egale a celle dont le fonds a augmente de valeur.' The rights of the person who has made the improvements depend upon the question whether they have been made in good or in bad faith ; they are made in good faith when the person who made them believed that he himself was the proprietor ; in bad faith when he knew, or ought to have known, that he was not so. Hence it has been decided by the French Courts that a person himself entitled to a terminable interest in the land, under which head a ' fermier ' is included, must be held to have made the improvements ' de mauvaise foi ' ; ^ and that therefore upon the determination of a tenancy the landlord is entitled to elect whether he would take the improvements of the tenant at their original cost, irrespective of the increased value of the farm, or require the > Lesenne, De la Projjriete, &c., p. 243. 30 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. outgoing tenant to restore the lands to their ori- ginal condition. The Canadian Code, which is merely a translation of the Code Civil, contains the 555th section of the French Code as section No. 417, and to prevent any mistake as to its meaning, gives, in section No. 412, an express de- finition of the term ' in good faith,' in accordance with the previous decisions of the French Courts above referred to. The principles of the Law of Landlord and Tenant adopted in the Code Napoleon are almost the same established by the Koman, but the latter does not in the Institutes group them together in any single chapter, and they are throughout the work scattered under different heads,' but a comparison of the French Code with the analysis of the Roman Law upon the subject contained in Hunter's Eoman Law will at once establish their identity.* » The Roman decisions and authorities on the subject are collected in the 19th Book of the Digest. * This right of the landlord to retiuire the tenant, upon the termination of the letting?, to restore the premises to their original condition, by the removal of useless, or mis- chievous imj/roceHU'iiti, is of considerable importance, and may be illustrated by the following:— A tenant holding the estate of the Skinners' Company for the residue of a long term of 99 years, commenced to build thereon an enormous mansion, which at the termination of the lease was left un- finished and in a ruinous condition. In a suit to administer the assets of the tenant, a claim was brou^rht in by the Com- pany for waste, and one of the points relied upon was the partial erection and subsequent abandonment of the house in THE FRENCH LAW AS TO 'AMELIORATION.' 31 question. Upon this point the claim failed, because the building of the house, although never completed, was what the English law defines as 'ameliorating waste,' and the tenant was not bound by any covenant to complete or keep it in repair. (Scott v. Ogilvie, M. of R. unreported). 32 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. CHAPTER V. LEADING PRINCIPLES OF THE FRENCH LAW. The Roman Law of landlord and tenant as codified by the French is a system thoroughly consequent and logical ; if the first principles upon which it is founded are once admitted, it is impossible not to admit its most extreme con- clusions. The system rests upon the following assumptions : (1.) That there should be free trade in land, and that the rules as to the hiring of land should be the same as those applicable to the hiring of any other commodity; (2.) That the relative rights and obligations of a landlord and his tenant are solely derived from the contract into which they have entered ; (3.) That in default of any express agree- ment, and so far as their agreement is silent, their rights and obligations are such as equity would infer from the nature of the contract itself; (4.) That the rights and obligations of the landlord and tenant are strictly reciprocal ; (5.) That neither the landlord nor tenant can claim the benefit of the contract unless he himself has previously fulfilled his obligations. LEADING PRINCIPLES OF THE FRENCH LAW. 33 The French law is based upon the application to the landlord and tenant, with the utmost im- partiality, of the same general propositions ; if it gives no undue advantage to the landlord, it certainly does not favour the tenant ; it refuses to regard the relation of landlord and tenant as anything exceptional, and applies to their rights and obligations the same principles and regards them in the same spirit as it would those of the owner and hirer of the most ordinary article ; it is the most complete and equitable application of the rules of free trade to the case of the letting and hiring of land. 34 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. CHAPTER VI. THE ENGLISH LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW AS SUB- SISTING IN IRELAND PRIOR TO 1860. The English law npon this subject is, like much else of English law, inconsequent and illogical ; it consists of a vast and undigested mass of sta- tutes and legal decisions, piled up without any leading principle or definite ideas. Commencing at a period when the landlord was all-powerful and the tenant's rights wholly disregarded, it has been continually amended in favour of the tenant, so much so that it is a question whether even the English Law as it now exists (or the Irish Law as it stood before 1860) is not more beneficial for the tenant than the Roman or French Law, and whether the rights of the landlord would not be vastly increased by the introduction into England of the Code Napoleon. .The lettings of lands in Ireland prior to the year 1870 may for the present purpose be divided into three classes, viz., (A.) Leases, (B.) Yearly tenancies, and (C.) Tenancies at will. (A.) In the case of a lease the landlord by a deed granted the land in question to the tenant either for lives, or for years (it is immaterial for the LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW PRIOR TO 1860. 35 present purpose whether a lease was freehold or not), subject to the payment of the rent agreed upon, and the tenant on his part covenanted to pay the rent and to do or forbear from doing such other acts as had been agreed upon between the parties ; the lease generally contained a further proviso that if the tenant violated any of the covenants entered into by him, the landlord could re-enter and determine the estate of the tenant. The effect of such a proviso was to place the tenant in the same position as to the payment of rent and the fulfilment of covenants as the French Law considers every tenant to stand in without any express covenant. (B.) Yearly tenancies or tenancies from year to year appear to have first arisen in the 16th century, and the validity of this fashion of letting was established as the result of Potkjntis case, 14 Hen. VIII. In this original case it is described as a * lease for the term of a year to commence at Michaelmas and continue unto the end of the said year, and so on to the next year, de anno in annum, as long as the parties pleased.' In ordi- nary language the letting was for an indefinite term of years commencing at a fixed date and determinable at the end of any current year by either party upon service of a six months' notice.' ' Lettings of land in Ireland for agricultural or pastoral purposes, by which tenancies from year to year were created subsequently to the 15th August, 1876, are now to be deter- .(^-t.^ A^>i minable upon a twelve months' notice to quit on any gale d2 '^"■^-^ ^^^. , ''^ 36 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. This mode of tenure suited the views of the owners of lands — then more anxious to secure political influence than to improve their estates — when the suffrage, previously confined to lease- holds, was in 1850, by the Act of the 13-14 Vict., eh. 69, extended to the occupiers of land of the annual rating of 121. A tenancy from year to year might exist for generations, and thus in the ideas of the tenants it was regarded as an almost perpetual interest, although subject at any time to be determined by a notice to quit; at an early period of the Common Law it would probably have developed into a perpetual customary tenure, as was the case of the copyhold tenure in England. (C.) A tenancy at will was a letting of land for such period as both landlord and tenant chose that the relation between them should continue — practically, so long as the landlord chose. But lands were very rarely held upon these terms, as such tenures could then be created only by special agreement. In the case of a letting which did not specify the term for which the lands were held, the Eng- lish Courts had to decide what term was to be implied in the contract, or inferred from the fact that the occupier was found in possession paying day of the calendar year, in which the rent becomes due and payable, irrespective of the period of the year at which the tenancy commenced ; and for certain specific purposes notice to quit may be served as to portion only of the hold- ing. 39, 40 Vic, ch. 63. LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW PRIOR TO 1860. 37 rent to the owner. This question was solved, as a matter of fact, by the assumption that the letting was similar to that in most ordinary use at the time ; down to the time of Lord Mansfield, the presumption was that the tenancy was one at will: from his date it was a tenancy from year to year. It is useful now to consider what were the chief rights and obligations, other than by ex- press agreement, of landlords and tenants in the same order as that in which they are dealt with in the French Code. As to the landlord's implied obligations. (1) He did not guarantee to the tenant that he had good title to make the lease, and therefore, if the tenant were put out of possession by the true owner of the land, he had no remedy against the landlord ; (2) he was not bound to keep the premises in repair ; (3) he did not guarantee to the tenant what the French lawyers defined as a ' possession utile.' The rights and obligations of the tenant, other than by express contract, were as follows : (1) He was bound to pay the rent reserved; (2) he was prohibited from committing waste, that is, destroying the subject matter by pulling down buildings, &c. ; (3) he was bound to give up possession at the termination of the lettings ; (4) he was not bound to keep the premises in repair ; (5) he was not bound to cultivate the premises ^ en hon pere de famille;' (6) he was .•W8059 38 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. not bound to give them up in as good condition as he received them. The tenant was entitled, as any other owner of an interest in land, to sell or sublet his farm to whom and upon what terms he pleased. It is frequently assumed that, in the case of a tenancy from year to year, the tenant had no such right, and the mistake may have arisen in the following manner. The tenant could convey to a purchaser no more than he himself had, and, upon the sale of a tenancy from year to year, the landlord, if he had any objection to the purchaser, could de- termine the yearly tenancy by a notice to quit, and owners of land are, as a matter of fact, un- willing to have a new tenant forced upon them of whose character and solvency they are igno- rant; the purchaser, therefore, as a matter of precaution, required an assurance from the land- lord that he was willing to accept him as a sub- stitute for the former tenant ; but whether the landlord assented or not to the sale, all the in- terest of the previous tenant passed by the sale to the purchaser. The tenant who held land for a period of uncertain duration had a right to the annual industrial crops upon the lands at the deter- mination of his letting, and to return into the farm for the purpose of harvesting and removing them; this was technically termed his right of emblements. As to the recovery of the rent, and the en- LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW PRIOR TO 1860. 39 forcement of covenants or agreements entered into by the tenant, the payment and fulfilment of these was not a condition precedent upon which the tenant was entitled to retain the pos- session ; and his interest was not forfeited by the non-payment or non-fulfilment of them.^ The law did not regard the relation of land- lord and tenant as a quasi-partnership (societe), nor did it treat the rent as the landlord's share in the produce of the farm. Hence the rent was not a charge upon the tenant's interest by way of hypothec ; nor were the crops considered as pledged for its payment, nor was the landlord's rent subject to deductions on account of the loss of the crop. The modes of enforcing the payment of the rent were three : — (I.) A personal action might be brought against the tenant either founded upon his ex- press contract, or upon the implied contract arising from his occupation. (II.) For a long period the English law re- garded the proceeding of distress as the ordinary mode of compelling the payment of rent. A distress was originally used to enforce the per- formance of feudal obligations, not the payment ' The diflEerence between the English and French law upon this subject arose from the fact that the latter referred the possession of the tenant solely to the contract of hiring ; the former considered the tenant to have acquired an actual estate in the lands for the term specified in an antecedent agreement. 40 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. of money, and the rights of the lord had been restricted by the statute of Marlbridge to the bare power of seizing the goods on the premises and retaining them as a pledge until the services were performed. But when the process of dis- tress was applied to the recovery of a money rent, the right of the landlord was extended to that of selling the goods seized, and retaining the arrears of rent out of the produce. Proceedings by dis- tress required the performance of so many tech- nical forms, introduced for the benefit of the tenant, and the failure to comply with these legal technicalities, by rendering the whole pro- ceeding illegal ab initio^ exposed the landlord to such heavy damages that a proceeding by dis- tress for the recovery of rent was always most reluctantly adopted.' ' The discredit into which the process of recovering rent by distress gradually fell is illustrated by the General Orders of the Irish Court of Chancery for the management of estates by the Receivers. By the 2nd G. O. of the 5th April, 1847, a Receiver was empowered, when the rent had remained unpaid for a certain time, to proceed by distress for the re- covery of such rent without any Rule or Order for that pur- pose, tuch remedy to be deemed a proper one in the Jint in- ttance ; but he could not proceed either in the Superior or County Court for the recovery of the rent without the direction of the Master. The 22nd G. O. of the 19th of May, 1867, amended the former by striking out therefrom the provision that the remedy by distress should be deemed the proper one to be taken by the Receiver for the recovery of rent in arrear, in the first instance, and directing that civil bill proceedings, where suitable, should be substituted in lieu thereof. LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW PRIOR TO 1860. 41 (III.) The action of ejectment, an action to recover the possession of land, could originally only be brought for non-payment of rent, when the letting was by a lease which contained a clause allowing the landlord to re-enter and avoid the lease upon the non-fulfilment by the tenant of his covenant to pay the rent. The right to recover in the action rested, not upon the non-payment of the rent, but upon the deter- mination of the letting. Previous to 1851 the right to bring an ejectment when one whole year's rent had been in arrear was extended to all cases of lettings under a written agreement, whether it did or did not contain a clause of re- entry, but was not applicable to the most numerous case of implied tenancies from year to year not created by a written agreement, but arising from the fact of the payment of rent.' The landlord in the latter case could not eject the tenant for non-payment of rent, but was forced to serve a notice to quit determining the tenancy; hence, if A on January 1, 1840, let land to B as a yearly tenant without writing, and B failed to pay the second and third half-yearly gales, which fell due on December 31, 1840, and June 30, 1841, A would have had to serve him with a notice to quit for January 1, 1843, and might thus have lost two and one half-years' rent before he could recover possession. To remedy 1 5 Geo. II., ch. 4, s. 1 (Irish) ; and 25 Geo. 11., ch. 13, s. 2 (Irish.) 42 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. this evil the right to bring an ejectment in the Civil Bill Courts upon non-payment of one year's rent was given to landlords, in the ease of hold- ings at a rent of less than 501. per annum not held under a written agreement, by the 14 and 15 Vict. c. 57, s. 73, but the tenancies of a higher amount remained subject to the old rule. The Courts of Equity regarded the proviso for re-entry and forfeiture as merely a mode of se- curing the payment of the rent, and if, there- fore, the tenant within a reasonable time (limited by statute to six months) paid the arrears of rent he could file a bill in Chancery to redeem his interest, and upon the settlement of an account between him and the landlord, in which the latter was charged with so much as he could in the interval without wilful default have made out of the premises, the forfeited lease was re- instated and the tenant put back into possession. This process of redemption was carried out in the manner most inconvenient to both parties; the tenant was put out of possession, and thus his means of paying the rent seriously diminished, and the landlord was put into possession of lands £»f which for six months he could make no pro- fitable use ; and as if the more to embarrass the landlord the mortgagees of the tenant had, it is difficult to see why, three further months during which they might themselves redeem. From the state of the real property law the person who ordinarily received the rent, and acted LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW PRIOR TO 1860. 43 as the owner of the estate, might not be legally entitled to take any proceedings against the tenant; the right to the rent, as it was tech- nically described, ran with the reversion — that is, in the theory of law, the relation of landlord and tenant did not arise unless the landlord was, as a matter of fact, entitled at law to the possession of the premises demised upon the natural deter- mination of the lease. Thus, if A, entitled to the land for twenty years from January 1, 1840, let these lands to B for ten years from January 1, 1850, the relation of landlord and tenant did not arise, but it would have arisen if he had let them for ten years from December 31, 1849. To the person who, claiming through the original landlord, was entitled to the possession of the lands on the determination of the lease the rights of the landlord as against the tenant passed. In most cases the person entitled to the ' reversion ' was a mortgagee, or trustee, or some other who had no practical connection with the business in hand or knowledge of the estate. Hence most actions against tenants had to be brought in the names of those who were stran- gers to the estates, and were naturally unwilling to have anything to say to the matter. As the interest of the tenant frequently was dealt with in the same manner as that of the landlord, it was often the case that when the technical land- lord had been discovered it was equally difficult to discover the technical tenant. The legal 44 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. subtleties formerly in use to escape the diffi- culties created by equally absurd anterior legal subtleties are now happily forgotten ; but it can be easily understood that the probability that in a proceeding against a tenant the action would be defeated by some wholly immaterial and purely technical point rendered those in receipt of the rents timorous of instituting actions, and afforded to the tenant a questionable protection. Every improvement in the real property law has been injurious to the tenants ; to a man in possession, a defendant in ejection, no system of law is so advantageous as one hopelessly en- tangled and incomprehensible. Upon the determination of the letting, the tenant gave up the land as it stood, and the landlord took it up as it stood. If the tenant lost his improvements, the landlord might have thrown back on his hands a farm almost worthless from wasteful cultivation ; the inequities were in theory balanced, but in practice the rule told against the tenant.* The wilful running out of the land so injurious to the owner frequently occurred in the case of tenants for fixed terms, but did not so often arise in the case of yearly ' This passage is folly justified by the expressions of Baron Parke in ' Button v. Warren ' (1 Mee & Welsh, 466) : * The Common Law, indeed, does so little to prescribe the relative duties of landlord and tenant, since it leaves the latter at liberty to purtue any course of managevie at he pleases, provided that he is net guilty of leaste, that,' Sec. LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW PRIOR TO 1860. 45 tenants who expected to hold on their farms. In the latter case it was always in the power of the landlord, if a tenant improved his farm, to serve a notice to quit, and having got rid of his tenant and appropriated his improvements to relet to another at a higher rate. Hence the notice to quit was frequently used as an unjust means of raising the rent, inasmuch as the tenant was thus compelled either to abandon his improve- ments to the landlord, or to consent to pay a rent increased by reason of the increased value which he himself had given to the farm — such a pro- ceeding on the part of the landlord is what Pothier condemns as contrary to the rule of equity, * qui ne permet pas de s'enrichir aux de- pens d'autrui.' The principle of law laid down by Gains, * id quod in solo nostro ab aliquo sedificatum est, quamvis ille suo nomine aedificaverit, jure natu- rali nostrum fit, quia superficies solo cedit ' (L. II. s. 73), was adopted by the English law, but without the equitable exception annexed to the rule by the Roman Code. The English rule as to fixtures had not its origin in any feudal custom, although it, like every objectionable portion of the landlord and tenant law, is popularly referred to the ' feudal system.' Like many other prin- ciples of the Roman it was, without any legisla- tive authority, considered as portion of the English law upon the authority of Bracton, who copied into his work De Legibus, &c., Angliae, 46 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. passages of the Institutes and Digest without acknowledgment. It was the incompleteness of Bracton's statement of the rule of the Roman Law (Brae. 1. 2, c. 1, s. 4) which rendered the English law so rigid and inequitable. Hence anything annexed by the tenant to the premises became a fixture and part of the substance of the freehold ; he had therefore no greater interest in it than he had in the premises themselves, and would be guilty of waste if he removed it. The strictness of the law had been relaxed in favour of trade and manufacture, and also as to articles of ornament and personal convenience ; but the question of fixtures remained a fertile subject of litigation, and the law reports contained learned judgments upon the rights of the landlord and tenant as to gas pipes, grates, water-butts, pumps, bells, pier-glasses, hothouses, &c.' ' The distinctions drawn by the French Law as between ' biens immeubles ' and ' biens meubles ' are just as refined. No rule of English law as to ' constructive fixtures ' exceeds the following : ' Quant aux statues, elles sont immeubles lorsqu' elles sont plac^es dans une niche pratiqv^e expres pour let recevoir, encore qu' elles puissent etre enlev^es sans fracture ou deterioration.' Code Civil, s. 525. 47 CHAPTER VII. THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1860. The law of landlord and tenant both in Eng- land and Ireland being in this most chaotic and illogical condition, an attempt was made in Ire- land in 1860 to remedy its most glaring defects and to introduce some intelligible rules suitable to the existing state of society. It is easy to per- ceive why this reform was attempted in Ireland, but has not yet been introduced into England. Political economists universally asserted that the wretched condition of Ireland arose from the embarrassed circumstances and want of business habits of the Irish landowners. ' Substitute ' they said, ' for the present landlords, practical men of business who will invest their capital in the pur- chase of Irish estates, and deal with the property which they so acquire in a thoroughly commercial spirit ; the true interests of the landlords and tenants are identical, and for his own benefit an intelligent landlord must improve the condition of his tenantry.' Thirty years since the political economists were the prophets of the period, and it was the received doctrine that free trade in land and the purchase of land to be dealt with as 48 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. a commercial speculation were the panacea for the sufferings of Ireland. The landlords' estates being purchased in the Incumbered Estates' Court as simply and expeditiously as furniture at a sheriffs sale, the mercantile principles had to be applied to the properties purchased by the new capitalist landlords. If capitalists were to invest their money in the purchase of estates, they were entitled to the same j&reedom of dealing with their lands as was applicable to the case of any other commodity. They claimed and were necessarily allowed, to make the best of their in- vestments by selling what they had bought at the full market value. The obvious right, there- fore, of the purchaser was to let his land for the highest rent which a tenant could be induced to offer, because the market value of any article is the highest price which it will fetch at an open competition. For the purpose of introducing free trade into the relations of landlord and tenant it was neces- sary to sweep away all lingering tradition of a feudal connection, and to free the parties from the technicalities of an obsolete system of real property. The framers of the Act of 1860 attempted to simplify the legal relations of landlord and te- nant ; to consolidate previous statutes ; to place the letting of land upon the simple basis of con- tract; and to modify their rights, in such a manner, and to introduce such new implied agree- THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1860. 49 ments as were suitable to the point of view from which they regarded the legal relation in question. An examination of the important sections of the Act of the 23-24 Vict. ch. 154 shows that it was not drawn in favour of the landlord. The chief provisions of this Act, which regulated the relations of agricultural tenants with their land- lords, were as follow : — I. The relation of landlord and tenant was declared to be one founded on contract, express or implied, and not upon tenure (section 3) ; by the section the ancient doctrine of the necessity of a reversion was abolished. II. If a tenant under a written agreement after the expiration of his term continued in pos- session for one month after a demand for pos- session by the landlord, such continuance in possession might, at the election of the landlord, be held to create a new tenancy from year to year upon the terms of the previous tenancy (section 5). III. That in respect of agreements contained or implied in the contract of letting, every as- signee of a landlord's interest should have the same right as against the tenant and his assignee as the original landlord had, and that every assignee of a tenant should have the same rights as against the landlord as the original tenant (sections 12 and 13). By these sections a vast amount of legal erudition relative to what con- tracts did or did not * run with the land ' was swept away, and the assignees of landlord and E 50 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. tenant respectively were considered, not as as- signees merely of an estate in the land, but as assignees of the benefit of the original contract. IV. An assignee of a tenant's interest cannot free himself from the fulfilment of the agreements contained in the original contract by an assign- ment to a third party without giving notice to the landlord of such assignment, and after the notice continues liable to the payment of the half-yearly gale of rent accruing next after the date of his notice (sections 14 and 15). This was to defeat the common practice of secretly assigning un- profitable leases to paupers. V. An assignment by a tenant of his interest with the consent in writing of his landlord re- leases the tenant from future liability under the agreements contained in the original contract (section 16). VI. The previous law as to fixtures was re- pealed, and it was enacted that in future ' all personal chattels, engines, machinery, and build- ings accessorial thereto, affixed to the freehold by the tenant at his own expense,' — ' and so at- tached to the freehold that they could be re- moved without substantial injury to the free- hold or the fixture itself, and which should not have been erected in pursuance of any obligation or in violation of any agreement, might be re- moved by the tenant.' This section follows almost the words of the 525th section of the Code Civil, treating of the rules as to accession : ' Le pro- THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1850. 51 prietaire est cense avoir attache a son fonds des effets mobiliers a perpetuelle demeure lorsqu'ils ne peuvent etre detaches sans ^tre fractures et deteriores, ou sans briser ou deteriorer la partie du fonds a laquelle ils sont attaches,' VII. Upon a subletting with the written con- sent of the landlord, the subtenant by paying his own rent to the tenant is relieved from any lia- bility for the rent, which was reserved by the original lease ; but the landlord, if the tenant allows his own rent to run in arrear, can require the subtenant to pay him the rent reserved on the subletting in discharge of the rent reserved by the original lease, and any subtenant may pay off the arrears of the head rent and have credit for such payment as against his own rent (sections 19, 20, and 21). VIII. In any action brought by a person claiming as an assignee of the original landlord, the fact that the plaintifif, or some person through whom he claims, within three years before the action received the rent for one year, is prima facie proof of title (section 24). IX. The tenant of premises containing an open mine may work the mine ; any tenant may work open quarries on the lands or cut turf in unreclaimed bog for his own purposes or improve- ment of the farm, but not for sale (sections 27, 28, 29). X. A tenant at a rack-rent holding for an uncertain period is entitled to hold, in lieu of B 2 52 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. emblements, the lands after the determination of his tenancy until *the last gale day ofthecm-rent year' (section 34). A tenant at a rent less than the full value retained his common right to emble- ments. XI. The destruction of the substantial subject matter of the letting, otherwise than by the de- fault of the tenant, and in the absence of any covenant on the tenant's part to repair, gives to the tenant a right to determine the letting by a surrender (section 40). This section is borrowed from the Civil Law, and repeals the rule of the English Common Law, which, treating the cove- nants in a lease as collateral to the letting of the land, bound the tenant to pay the covenanted rent during the term, notwithstanding the de- struction of the subject matter of the letting. XII. In every lease (unless it be otherwise expressly agreed) there is to be implied on the part of the landlord covenants for good title to make the lease and for quiet enjoyment by the tenant without interruption by any person, and on the part of the tenant to pay the rent and to give up quiet possession of the premises in good and substantial repair and condition, on the de- termination of the lease (sections 40 and 41). XIII. In case of the surrender to, or resump- tion by, the landlord of any portion of the premises, his rights in respect of the residue of the land shall not be prejudiced (section 44). This section repeals the old rule that in neither of the cases THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1860. 53 mentioned in the section could the landlord re- cover any rent out of the residue ; such a rule was absurd in the case of a surrender ; but under the Civil Law the wrongful resumption by the landlord of any portion of the premises would have suspended his right to recover it. XIV. In an action for the recovery of rent, the tenant may set off any debts due to him by the landlord (section 48). XV. A landlord cannot recover by distress more than the rent of the last preceding year (section 51). Previous to 1870 the law considered the feudal process of distress as the primary remedy for the recovery of rent, and the action of ejectment as a secondary or substituted pro- ceeding ; thus, in the earlier Acts dealing with ejectments for nonpayment of rent, the right to bring the action was confined to cases in which there was no sufficient distress on the lands. The relation of landlord and tenant being shifted to the basis of contract, the right to distrain could be no longer supported upon its original theory; but if it had been attempted not merely to regulate it but to entirely abolish it, the landlord, not illogically, might have insisted that under a system of contract they were entitled to all the remedies given by the Civil Law for the recovery of rent. XVI. As to ejectments for the nonpay- ments of rent, any person substantially and beneficially entitled to the rent may bring an 54 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. action of ejectment for nonpayment of rent against any tenant, whether holding under a written or iTnplied agreement, whenever a year's rent is in arrear ; when the year's rent is less than lOOL the proceeding may be taken in the County Court ; it is sufficient to maintain such an action if a tenancy can be shown to exist between- the parties, and all the legal fictions and forms which previously complicated such proceedings are now abolished ; the only necessary defendant to such an action is the person in actual possession of the lands as the tenant or subtenant, and the summons (now the writ) is served upon him as in any personal action ; if no person is in possession, the summons (now the writ) may be posted on the premises or nearest market town ; upon the writ of habere to the sherifiF the amount of the rent in arrear and the costs must be endorsed, and the tenant may pay the sheriflf up to the moment of execution ; at any time within six months after the execution the tenant may pay the amount due for rent and costs into the court in which the action is brought and thereupon apply to be restored to possession (sections 51 to 71). Proceeding upon the same assumption as the Civil Law, that the relation of landlord and tenant was merely a species of hiring, the points in which the Act of 1860 differed from the Civil Law are remarkable ; if it did not imply on the part of the landlord that the farm let was a * possession utile,' or make him in any case par- THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1860. 55 ticipate in the loss arising from a failure of the crop, it neither gave him a hypothec to secure his rent, nor a power to re-enter upon the breach of any agreement of the letting, except upon the nonpayment of the rent; while it treated the relation of landlord and tenant as an ordinary contract, it treated this relation as against both parties, as one stridissimi juris, and not to be tempered by the equities so much favoured by the Eoman lawyers. The cause of these diffe- rences was the different views which the Eoman and English lawyers took of the original nature of the contract itself. (1) The former considered a letting of land for a term to be a quasi-sale, with an equitable warranty that the land was worth the annual rent; the latter that it was a mercantile transaction subject to the rule of ' caveat emptorJ' (2) The former considered the rent as the owner's share in the proceeds of the farm, and therefore gave to the landlord the right of hypothec, and compelled him to share in the loss occasioned by a deficient harvest ; the latter held the rent as something collateral to the letting — cotemporary but not conditional : the tenant made his bargain, and, as in every other mercantile transaction, ran the chance of gain or loss. (3) The former considered the several agreements of the tenant, whether expressed or implied, as conditions precedent of his possession, and held, therefore, that the landlord could bring his action to re-enter upon the breach of any 66 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. agreement, expressed or implied ; the latter, con- sidering all such agreements (except that for the payment of rent) as collateral, gave the landlord no right to re-enter, and left him to his personal action for damages in all except the one excepted case. Notwithstanding the diflferences above re- ferred to, the close resemblance of the Act of 1860 to the French Code is most remarkable ; the numerous points of simileirity do not appear to have arisen from the study or conscious adop- tion of the principles of the French system ; the form of the sections would lead rather to the conclusion, that its author was wholly ignorant of the Civil or French Law ; but these rules are the necessary logical consequence of the assump- tion common to both systems that the letting of land is to be treated simply as a contract of hiring. 57 CHAPTER VIII. THE RESULTS OF THE ACT OF 1860. The Act of 1860 swept away every trace of the feudal relation between landlord and tenant ; the landlord, certainly, since the passing of this Act, has no more right to claim from his tenants any personal respect or political obedience than the shopkeeper from his customers ; the tenant has no more claim for the assistance and sympathy of the landlord than he has for that of his grocer. They occupy in respect of each other simply the relation of any other merchant and his customers. If free trade in land was to be desired, it was facilitated by this Act; if the simplification of the law was advantageous, this Act largely pro- moted it. Henceforth, the landlord was to differ from the village baker, butcher, grocer, or pub- lican, merely in the nature of the article in which he traded. Feudal duties perish with feudal rights : the owner of land lets it to the tenant, and the tenant hires the land from the landlord ; the transaction does not differ — and it was intended that it should not differ — from the chartering of a ship or the hiring of a street cab : the hirers of land henceforth owe no special respect, and 58 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. need show no deference to their landlord : if the tenants pay the rent which they have agreed to pay, and perform their agreements of the let- ting, they are as independent of the landlord as of the village huckster — when they have settled their pass-book ; but, if so, what claim have they longer on their landlord for protection, assistance, or forbearance? Why should he, more than any other, be expected to aid the poor, assist in local charities, give a site for the parish chapel, or be considerate in the collection of his debts ? By free trade in land Ireland was to be re- generated, and those who were to take the benefit of the system were bound to accept its drawbacks. The objection to the application of a land law founded upon contract to the relations of land- lords and tenants in Ireland lay, not in the in- justice of the law itself nor in any advantage given by it to the landlord as against the tenant (for the system as based on pure contract was strictly just, and the reforms in the law had been made distinctly in favour of the tenant), but in its introduction into a society not adapted for it. As between the landlord and the majority of the tenants, there was not, nor could be, any freedom of contract. The smaller tenants were not possessed of any capital, and lived poorly by their own labour upon their unimproved farms. If deprived of their farms they had no other means of livelihood ; the demand for land so far THE RESULTS OF THE ACT OF 1860. 59 exceeded the supply that they had no hopes of establishing themselves elsewhere, and therefore the interest of a tenant in a farm fetched a price absurdly large as compared with the returns to be had from the land. A tenant once turned out of his holding had no means of existence; to him and his family the loss of his tenancy meant starvation and death. When served with a notice to quit the farmer was willing to offer any rent for a new letting of his holding, regardless of his ability to pay it in subsequent years. From the very nature of the tenancy from year to year many tenants naturally regarded their farms as their own property, subject to the payment of the usual rent. Upon farms held under this tenure families had lived for generations ; the land had been in many cases reclaimed and improved by themselves or their fathers ; and when it had not been so they believed that it had ; easy-going and unenterprising they never realised the possibility of a notice to quit, and when it was served upon them it seemed an act of unjust oppression and a sudden destruction. The energetic purchaser in the Landed Estates Court generally served, notices to quit upon all the yearly tenants with a view to a ' readjust- ment of the rents,' and having thus increased his income, either congratulated himself upon the large returns upon his investment, or sold to an- other capitalist his estate enhanced in value by a fictitious rental. 60 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. It is but just to state that in the vast majority of estates the relations between landlord and tenant continued unchanged, and in many in- stances where rents were increased the increase of the rent was warranted by the increased price of farming produce. Most of the ejectments also were not for the purpose of increasing the rent; many were brought with the object of substituting large for small farms ; many were brought for the purpose of stripping the land and improving the holdings of the tenants themselves ; and many were ren- dered necessary by the quarrels of the members of the family of a deceased tenant contending for the succession to the farm. But it must be re- membered, in justice to the tenants, that every notice to quit brought home to the tenant the power of the landlord to evict him ; every use by a landlord of his legal power for the purpose of raising the rent or obtaining a fine from some in- coming tenant was a conclusive proof that this power might be harshly and inequitably used ; even when an estate was justly and humanely managed, the tenants were well aware that their landlord might die, and that upon his death his property might be sold by the Landed Estates Court, in small lots, to country shopkeepers or local capitalists — the most greedy of purchasers and worst of landlords. The principle of free trade in land had failed to improve the condition of Ireland ; the statutory THE RESULTS OF THE ACT OF 1860. 61 declaration of this doctrine had terrified the tenants into increasing agitation, and it became necessary either not to enforce the new theory of law until the population were so improved as to be capable of appreciating an advanced Code (an event certainly not likely soon to occur), or to in- troduce legislation of an admittedly retrograde character, for the purpose of palliating patent evils and allaying not ill-founded discontent. 62 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. CHAPTER IX. THE IRISH LAND ACT OF 1870. The Landlord and Tenant Act, 1870 (33 and 34 Vict. ch. 46), better known as the Irish Land Act, sought, according to those who were respon- sible for it, to accomplish three principal objects : 1. To obtain for the tenants in Ireland ' secu- rity of tenure.' 2. To encourage the making of improvements throughout the country; and, 3, to create a peasant proprietorship in Ireland. The Act itself is divided into five parts. The first part deals with the occupation of land. The second part deals with its ownership, and en- deavours to facilitate the purchase of their hold- ings by tenants from their landlords. The third part enables the Board of Public Works in Ireland to advance money for the purposes of the Act. The fourth and fifth parts contain some miscel- laneous clauses and definitions in connection with this Act. Reference is here made only to those sections which materially affected the relation of landlords and tenants. The Act made no alterations in the tenancies held imder the Ulster Tenant Right Custom ; it merely gave legal sanction to, and enforced, the THE IRISH LAND ACT OF 1870. 63 Ulster Custom against the landlords of the estates which were subject to it. The tenants of these estates were secured the benefit of the custom, but not bound to hold under it, for any such tenant could abandon his right under the custom, and claim the rights given to all tenants by the statute. What course should be adopted in obtaining for tenants, whose rights were to be regulated by the Act of 1870, ' Security of tenure,' was a matter of the utmost difficulty. It was not possible in 1870 to state openly that free trade in land was the real cause of the renewed agita- tion of the Irish tenantry, or to propose that the rights of those who had invested their capital under a State guarantee in the purchase of lands in the Landed Estates Court should be diminished, without compensation, for the public benefit. The law of Great Britain and Ireland had persistently refused to recognise any interest or co-proprietorship in the occupier of the soil apart from a mere permission to cultivate it. The land itself was the absolute property of the land- lord, subject to the existing contracts under which it had been hired out to the tenants. The pur- chaser in the Landed Estates Court had purchased this absolute ownership in the land, subject only to the existing tenancies. By his purchase he was guaranteed the property in, and actual posses- sion of, the land upon the termination of the tenancies in the schedule, and the protection of 64 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. the law in the exercise of his legal right of deter- mining the existing yearly tenancies. The right of forcing the yearly tenants to pay the fu! market value of their farms, or of clearing them oflF the land, was notoriously put forward as an inducement to such purchasers. The framers of the Act dared not to state openly (and it was constantly denied) that the object of this statute was to give the tenant any estate in the land, or to transfer to him any por- tion of the absolute ownership. The Act, there- fore, apparently gave the tenant no new rights, nor in anywise deprived the landlord of any ; but attempted to effect its object in a circuitous manner by affixing what was essentially a penalty to the exercise of rights which it admitted to be legal. The Act in fact said to the landlords, * Your right to evict your tenants is incontestable, no one could dream of depriving you of what is most certainly your property ; you may, of course, turn out your tenants as you like, but it shall be made so expensive a proceeding that you will think seriously before you attempt it.' This was described as a process by which bad landlords were obliged to act as the good landlords did ; it might be more justly stated to be an enactment by which the amusement of evicting tenants was made a monopoly of the wealthier proprietors. Thus the rights given to the tenants as against their landlords are not stated affirmatively in the statute ; the rights of the tenant are, so to say, la- THE IRISH LAND ACT OF 1870. 65 tent, and cannot be exercised until the landlord has previously attempted to exercise his legal fight of resuming the possession. Until the landlord ' disturbed ' the tenant, the rights of the latter were precisely the same as they were be- fore the Act ; from the date of the disturbance, the tenant acquired a negative right of refusing to give up the possession without compensation. Under this statute the tenant did not acquire any * estate ' in the land, if the term ' estate ' is used in its technical English meaning; but of the ownership of the land, whether the word be used in its popular or proper meaning, he did ac- quire a share ; for if a man cannot be put out 'of possession by the rightful owner without the payment of a certain sum of money, he is an owner to the extent of the sum requisite to buy him out. The Act of 1870 is not intended to regulate the relations and rights of all landlords and tenants, for it does not apply to any holding which is not agricultural or pastoral in its char- acter, and therefore excludes all lettings of houses and of lands which, although more or less tilled or grazed, are taken for residential and not farm- ing purposes (section 71). The Act also excludes from its operation the letting of demesne lands and town parks, holdings by servants or hired labourers, lettings for purposes of temporary grazing, and lettings acknowledged in writing to be made for the purpose of temporary convenience. F 66 THE IRISH LAND LAWS. Tenants entitled to the benefit of the Ulster Custom must elect whether they will claim under the custom or the general provisions ; they cannot of course obtain the advantages of both species of tenure. The leading provisions of the Act are as fol- lows : — It introduces an entirely new rule of law as to what is styled compensation for disturbance. Any tenant of any holding under a tenancy created after the passing of the Act (less than a lease for thirty-one years ') if disturbed in his holding by the act of the landlord, and any tenant from year to year of any holding rated at not more than ' The extent to which the right of free contract in land was aflFected by this section is not at first perceived. If A now let by lease to B an agricultural holding in Ireland for the term of thirty years, the 42nd section of the Act of 1860, which is still law, declares that there shall be implied in this lease a covenant on the part of the tenant to give peaceable pos- session of the demised premises on the determination of the lease ; but the Act of 1870 interposes, and forbids the landlord to require of the tenant the fulfilment of this covenant without paying him compensation for so doing. The object of the Act of 1870 was to render it the interest of the landlord to grant leases for thirty-one years by making it ex- pensive for him to get up the land from tenants holding for a shorter term or lesser interest, but the selection of the phrase * compensation for digtvrbanre ' was most imf ortunate. It may be conjectured that it was suggested by the case of tenancies from year to year determined by a notice to quit, but how a tenant for a fixe This most mean ' enabling tenanttfor life to lease,' and the Act referred to is the Irish Act of the 25th Geo. III. cb. 62. APPENDIX. 121 powei"s under the Act in question are of constant occurrence. An order of the Master of the Rolls made under this Act authorising a lease for a very long term for the erection of a linen manufactory, in the case of the estate of the Earl of Charlemont, may be inspected in the office of the Chancery Registrars. Again, in the 77th page of the same work occurs this passage. * What is more important : a tenant for years has not the right of ownership, as was afterwards ex- perienced in the very case before us. The capitalist accepted a lease for 999 years ; although diverted from his original design with respect to the gi'ound. Inputting it to a different purpose he proceeded to level an emi- nence, and to carry away the gravel for use elsewhere. But the law of landlord and tenant says : — " If a tenant opens pits for the pvirpose of raising stone or waste, it will be waste." And this being the law the landlord actually obtained an injunction to restrain the tenant's proceedings, and mulcted him in damages.' It can scarcely be gravely alleged that the Irish law is ex- ceptional and unreasonable which forbids one who has hired the use of the superficies of land, for a limited term, to destroy the corpus of the demised premises by carrying off and appropriating the gravel on the land, an act the result of which probably in most cases would be that, when the ' eminence ' of valuable gravel had been disposed of, the premises would be thrown back on the landlord's hands in the condition of a gravel pit filled with water. The next paragraph is also as remarkable : ' Once more, in another county, the very same capitalist opened an iron mine by arrange- ment with the lord of the soil, and commenced works on an extensive scale. TJie landlord then demanded terms to lohich he was not entitled by his contract ; but 1 22 APPENDIX. the price of Irish iron has not been high enough of late years to defray the cost of a Chancery suit in addition to the costs of production, and delay, worry, and anxiety are not inducements to industrial enter- prise; so the iron works were suspended.' It is insinuated here that the Irish law is mischievously defective because it does not prevent a landlord from making claims as to the merits of which we have no means of judging, and that Courts can do no more thaii deal with disputes when they have arisen ; and, again, it is ignored that if the landlord had demanded terms to which he was not entitled imder his contract, he would have had to pay the costs of the suit. As to the peculiar costs and delay of the Chancery proceeding, it may be added that the old and expensive practice of Chancery had been abolished in 1851, and a very simple, cheap, and (when accounts had not to be taken) expeditious course of procedure then existed in that Court. It may not unreasonably be conjectured that the capitalist who took so peculiar a view of his rights as a lessee for years, perhaps fell into some similar error as to his rights imder his mining lease. As to the Irish law of waste, Mr. Cliffe Leslie makes very remarkable statements, and usee very strong language. Thus, in page 107 : — * A legislature of landlords, devising a code of laws for Ireland, lias thoiigfit only of tJie landlord ; and the ground lias been cursed for his sake. Does anyone need further illastration of the fundamental policy of that code 1 lie will find it in a passage of the standard treatise on " The Law of Landlord and Tenant in Ire- land," defining what waste is in the eye of the law — *' A tenant has no right to alter the nature of the land demised, by converting ancient pasture into arable APPENDIX. 123 land, or arable land into woodland, or by enclosing and cultivating waste land included in the demise, &c." Is it not rightly called a law of waste 1 To keep the land of the island unchanged, unchangeable, and un- improved alike in its own condition and its ownership, to keep the world standing still from age to age, and therefore tumbling to decay,' &c., &c. The passage in Furlong is to be found in the 657th page in the old edition ; if reference be made to the footnotes of Mr. Furlong's work, we find no trace of a code of laws devised for Ireland by a legislature of landlords; Mr. Furlong does not refer to any Irish statute in support of his statements, nor, indeed, could he, as there never were any such enactments, as anyone can easily ascertain by reference to ' Oulton's Index of the Irish Statutes,' p. 795, title ' Waste ' ; but he does refer to no less than seventeen reported cases, all of which without exception are English, and all turn upon the simple principle that he who hires an article cannot destroy the article hired, during the period of the hiring, but must return it in the same state in which he received it. This selection of passages from Mr. Cliffe Leslie is not to be taken as proving that upon this subject he is peculiarly inaccurate; his writings have been made use of because they have naturally, on account of the earnestness and great literary ability of the author, acquired a large cii'culation, and exercised much in- fluence upon public opinion. As to the less known and less careful writers upon this subject, we can only say — Quia si in viridi ligno hcec faciunt, in ariclo qtiid fiet ? An instance of the extraordinary manner in which the plainest legal principles are ignored occurs in the 124 APPENDIX. letter of the * Special Correspondent of the Standard , of the 30th December, 1879. * He (Lord Sligo) has the reputation of being the only large landlord in Mayo who has raised his rent since the passing of the Land Act ; and there is no re- sisting the evidence that this has been done in some cases to the extent of 50 per cent., on holdings in which it was declared emphatically that the tenant had made all the improvements which were the justifi- cation for the advance, the landlord never having con- tributed a shilling in any shape or form. So far as I could gather, the form in which these improvements were efiected, so that it became possible, as it was put to me, for the landlord " to confiscate the capital of his tenants " was this : most of the small holdings are conterminous with large tracts of waste, mountain, or bog land, and the small farmers in their spare time set to work to reclaim portions of these. On the Sligo estate this practice, which is common all over the west of Ireland, has been followed ; but the agent has had a sharp eye on such improvements, and instead of the equitable rule which seems to prevail over the Dillon estates, on the Roscommon side of the county, of leaving the improver to enjoy what he has thus created during his tenancy, the landlord has stepped in and insisted on a share — and, as some insisted, the lion's share — the moment there is anything to divide.' The con-ectness of the statement is immaterial ; as is the meanness or generosity of an owner of property in asserting his rights. The facts of the case, stripped of rhetoric, stand thus. A hires of B the use for a limited period of (say) ten acres at a certain rent, and, having been put into possession of the ten acres agreed upon, enters upon and appropriates the ten adjoining APPENDIX. 125 acres, and cultivates for his own profit these second ten acres, to which he has no title whatsoever. The legal healings of the case would turn upon the follow- ing points : (1) Whether the tenant wilfully trespassed upon and wrongfully occupied land which he knew was not his own ; in this case he was a wrongdoer from the fii'st, and has no legal locios standi. But (2) if the tenant entered upon and improved these lands under a mistake as to his rights (whether referred to custom or otherwise), and the landlord, with notice of the ten- ant's reclamation and improvements, stood by, intend- ing to appropriate to himself the tenant's expenditure, he would be restrained by an injunction from the per- petration of such a fraud (see O'Fay v. Burke, 8 Ir. Ch. p. 518). If we vary the rank and position of the landlord and tenant, there will be no doubt as to the rule of law to be applied to such a transaction ; and upon this subject the following case, the evidence of which is of record in the Court of Chancery, may be safely referred to. By a lease of the 7th of May, 1806, H.M. de- mised to H.TJ., the lands of Cloonasea in the King's County, containing 155 Irish acres (251a. Or. lOp. English), for 21 years, at the rent of 80^. Irish (73^. 16s. \\\d. English), with a quoties toties covenant for renewal. The lease was renewed from time to time, down to the year 1869. The representatives of H.M. in 1872 obtained from the Church Commissioners a grant in fee of the lands in question, with others, upon payment of the sum of 2860Z. 195. 4c?., and subject to the perpetual head rent of 407^. Is. 7s. THE DAILY NEWS' CORRESPONDENCE of the War between Russia and Turkey, to the fall of Kars. Including the letters of Mr. Archibald Forbes, Mr. J. E. McGahan, and other Special Correspondents in Europe and Asia. Second Edition, enlarged. Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. FROM THE FALL OF KARS TO THE CONCLUSION OF PEACE. Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. Davidson. — the life OF A SCOTTISH PROBATIONER ; being a Memoir of Thomas Davidson, with his Poems and Letters. By James Brown, Minister of St. James's Street Church, Paisley. Second Edition, revised and enlarged, with Portrait Crown 8vo. 7/. 6d. Deas. — THE RIVER CLYDE. An Historical Description of the Rise and Progress of the Harbour of Glasgow, and of the Im- Erovement of the River from GLisgow to Port Glasgow. By J. lEAS, M. Inst. C.E. 8vo. los. dd. HISTORY, BIOGRAPHY, TRAVELS, ETC. 7 Denison.— A history of CAVALRY FROM THE EAR. LIEST TIMES. With Lessons for the Future. By Lieut. -Col. George Denison, Commanding the Govemor-General's Body Guard, Canada, Author of " Modern Cavalry." With Maps and rians. 8vo. i8j. Dilke. — GREATER BRITAIN. A Record of Travel in English- speaking Countries during 1866-7. (America, Australia, India. By Sir Charles Wentworth Dilke, M.P. Sixth Edition* Crown 8vo. 6j. "Many of the subjects discussed in these pages" says the Daily News, " are of the widest interest, and such as no tnan who cares for the future of his rcue and of the world can afford to treat with indifference. " Doyle.— HISTORY of America. By j. a, doyle. with Maps. i8mo. 4s, 6d. " Mr. Doyle's style is clear and simple, his facts are accurately stated, and his book is meritoriously free from prejudice on questions where partisanship runs high amongst us." — Saturday Review. Drummond of Hawthornden : the STORY of his life and WRITINGS. By Professor Masson. With For- trait and Vignette engraved by C. H. Jeens. Crown 8vo. loj. 6d. Duff. — Works by M. E. Grant-Duff, M.P., late Under Secretary of State for India : — NOTES OF AN INDIAN JOURNEY. With Map. 8vo. lox. 6d. MISCELLANIES POLITICAL AND LITERARY. 8vo. ioj. 6d, Eadie. — life of JOHN EADIE, D.D., LL.D. By James Brown, D.D., Author ot " The Life of a Scottish Probationer." With Portrait. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 7^. 6d. "An ablywfitten and characteristic biography." — Times. Elliott. — LIFE OF HENRY VENN ELLIOTT, of Brighton. By JOSIAH Bateman, M.A. With Portrait, engraved by Jeens. Extra fcap. 8vo. Third and Cheaper Edition. 6s, Elze. — ESSAYS ON SHAKESPEARE. By Dr. Karl Elze. Translated with the Author's sanction by L. Dora Schmitz. 8vo. 12S. English Men of Letters. Edited by John Morley. a Series of Short Books to tell people what is best worth knowing as to the Life, Character, and Works of some of the great English Writers. In crown 8vo. Price 2s. 6d. each. MACMILLAN'S CATALOGUE OF WORKS IN English Men of Letters. — contintud. I. DR. JOHNSON. By Leslie Stephen. * ' The new series opens luHl 'vith Air. Leslie Stephen's sketch of Dr. Johnson. It could hardly have been done better ; and it will convey to the readers for 'whom it is intended a juster estimate of yohnson than either of the two essays ef Lord Macaulay " — Pall Mall Gazette. II. SIR WALTER SCOTT. B7R. H. Hutton. " The tone of the volume is excellent throughout." — ATHENiEUM. " We could not -wish for a more suggestive introduction to Scotland his poems and novels." — Examiner. IIL GIBBON. By J. C. Morison. ** As a clear, thoughtful, and attractive record of the life and works of the greatest among the world's historians, it deserves the higlitst praise." — Examiner. IV. SHELLEY. By J. A. Symonds. " The lovers of this great poet are to be congratulated on having at their command so fresh, clear, and intelligent a presentment of the subject, written by a man of adequate and wide culture. — Athen^UM. V. HUME. By Professor Huxley. "// may fairly be said that no one now living could have expounded Ilnrne with more sympathy or with equal perspicuity." — ATHEN^tUM. VI. GOLDSMITH. By William Black. *' Mr. Black brings a fnc sympathy and taste to bear in his criticism of Goldsmiths writings as well as in his sketch of the incidents of his life." Athenaeum. VII. DEFOE. By W. MiNTO. " Mr. Atinto's book is careful and accurate in all that is stated, and faithful in all that it suggests. It will repay reading more than once." Athen>t:um. i- VIII. BURNS. By Principal Shairp, Professor of Poetry in the University of Oxford. " // is impossible to desire fairer criticism than Principal Shairp* s on Burns" s poetry .... Notu of the series has given a tidier estimate cither of character or of genius than this little volume .... and all who r,ad it will be thoroughly grateful to the author for this monununt to the genius of Sco'land's greatest poet." — Spectator. IX. SPENSER. By the Very Rev. the Dean of St. Paul's. "Dr. Church is master of his subject, an I writes always with good taste." — Academy. X. THACKERAY. By Anthony Troli.ope. *' Mr. Trollofe's sketch is excellently adapted to fufU the purpose of the series in which it appears." — Athex.^um. XI. BURKE. By John Morley. ** Terliaps 'he best critidsm yd published en the life and character of i \In preparation. "l HISTORY, BIOGRAPHY, TRAVELS, ETC. 9 English Men of Letters. — continued. Burke is contained in Mr. Morley^s compendious lnog)-aphy. His style is vigorous and polished, and both his political and personal judgment, and his literary criticisms are just, generous, subtle, and in a high degree interesting. " — Saturday Review. MILTON. By MARK Pattison. \yust ready."] HAWTHORNE. By Henry James. SOUTHEY. By Professor DowDEN. CHAUCER. By Professor Ward. COWPER. By Goldwin Smith. BUNYAN. By J. A. Froude. WORDSWORTH. By F. W. H. Myers. Others in preparation. Eton College, History of. By H. C. Maxwell Lyte, M.A. With numerous Illustrations by Professor Delamotte, Coloured Plates, and a Steel Portrait of the Founder, engraved by C. PI. Jeens. New and cheaper Issue, with Corrections. Medium 8vo. Cloth elegant. 2ij. " We are at length presented with a work on England'' s greatest public school, worthy of the subject of which it treats. . . . A really valuable and authentic history of Eton College." — Guardian. European History, Narrated in a Series of Historical Selections from the best Authorities. Edited and arranged by E. M. Sewell and C. M. Yonge. First Series, crown 8vo. 6j. ; Second Series, 1088-1228, crown 8vo. 6j. Third Edition. " We kno%v of scarcely anything," says the Guardian, of this volume, "which is so likely to raise to a higher level the average standard of English education." Faraday. — MICHAEL FARADAY. By J. H. Gladstone, Ph.D., F.R.S. Second Edition, with Portrait engraved by Jeens from a photogi-aph by J. Watkins. Crown 8vo. 4^. 6d. PORTRAIT. Artist's Proof. Sj. Forbes.— LIFE and letters OF JAMES DAVID FORBES, F.R.S., late Principal of the United College in the University of St. Andrews. By J. C. Shairp, LL.D., Principal of the United College in the University of SL Andrews ; P. G. Tait, M.A., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh; and A. Adams-Reilly, F.R.G.S. 8vo. with Portraits, Map, and Illustrations, l6s. Freeman. — Works by Edward A. Freeman, D.C.L.,LL.D. :— HISTORICAL ESSAYS. Third Edition. 8vo. los. 6d. Contents :— /. ''The Mythical and Romantic Elements in Early Ensrlish History;" II. "'The Continuity of English History ;" III. "The Relations betzvcen the Crowns of [England and Scotland ;" IV. lo MACMILLAirS CATALOGUE OF WORKS IN Free man — contimied. " Si. Thomas of Canterbury and his Biograthers;" V. " The Reign of Edward the Third:" VI. ''The Holy Roman Empire;" VII. ''The Franks and the Gauls;" VIII. "The Earlv Sieges of Paris;" IX. "Frederick the lirst, King of Italy ;" X. "The Emperor Frederick the Second:" XI. "Charles the Bold ;" XII. " Presidential Government. HISTORICAL ESSAYS. SECOND SERIES. 8vo. \os. 6d. The principal Essays are: — "Ancient Greece and Mediceval Italy:" ** Mr. Gladstones Homer and the Homeric Ages:" "The Historians of Athens:" "The Athenian Democracy:" "Alexander the Great:" "Greece during the Macedonian Period:" "Mommsttis History of Rome ^^ "Lucius Cornelius Sulla :" " The Flavian Ca:sars." HISTORICAL ESSAYS. Third Series. 8vo. 12s. Contents : — " First Impressions of Rome." " The Illyrian Emperors and their Land." "Augusta Jreverorum." "The Goths at Ravenna." "Race and Language." "The Byzantine Empire." "First Impressions of Athens.' "Mediaeval and Modern Greece." "The Southern Slaves." "Sicilian Cycles." "The Normans at Palermo." COMPARATIVE POLITICS.— Lectures at the Royal Institution. To which is added the " Unity of History," the Rede Lecture at Cambridge, 1872. 8vo. 14J. THE HISTORY AND CONQUESTS OF THE SARACENS. Six Lectures. Third Edition, with New Preface. Crown 8vo. y.ed. HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL SKETCHES: chiefly Italian. With Illustrations by the Autlior. Crown 8vo. los. td. HISTORY OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, from the Foun- dation of the Achaian League to the Disruption of the United States. VoL I. General Introduction. History of the Greek Federations. 8vo. 21 s. OLD ENGLISH HISTORY. With Fnje Coloured Maps. Fourth Edition. Extra fcap. 8vo., half-bound. 6s. " The book indeed is full of instruction and interest to students of alt ages, and he must be a well-infot^ned man indeed who will not rise from its perusal with clearer and more accurate ideas of a too muck neglected portion of English history." — SPECTATOR. HISTORY OF THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF WELLS, as illustrating the History of the Cathedral Churches of the Old Foundation. Crown 8vo. ys. 6d. '* The history assumes in Mr. FreematCs hands a significance^ and, we may add, a practical value as suggestive of what a cathedral ought to be^ which make it well worthy of mention." — SPECTATOR. HISTORY, BIOGRAPHY, TRAVELS, ETC. ll Freeman — conthmed. THE GROWTH OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES. Crown 8vo. 5j. Third Edition, revised. GENERAL SKETCH OF EUROPEAN HISTORY. Being Vol. I. of a Historical Course for Schools edited by E. A. Freeman. New Edition, enlarged with Maps, Chronological Table, Index, &c. l8mo. 3^-. dd. " It supplies the great want of a good foundation for historical teach- ing. The scheme is an excellent one, and this instalment has been accepted in a -way that promises much for the volumes that are yet to appear." — Educational Times. THE OTTOMAN POWER IN EUROPE : its Nature, its Growth, and its Decline. With Three Coloured Maps. Crown 8vo. 'js. 6d. Galileo. — the private life of GALILEO. Compiled principally from his Correspondence and that of his eldest daughter. Sister Maria Celeste, Nun in the Franciscan Convent of S. Matthew in Arcetri. With Portrait. Crown 8vo. 7j. 6d. GeddeS.— THE PROBLEM OF THE HOMERIC POEMS. By W. D. Geddes, LL.D., Professor of Greek in the University of Aberdeen. Svo, 14^. Gladstone — Works by the Right Hon.W. E. Gladstone, M.P. :— JUVENTUS MUNDI. The Gods and Men of the Heroic Age. Crown Svo. cloth. With Map. los. 6d. Second Edition. "Seldom" says the Athen^um, " out of the great poems themselves, have these Divinities looked so majestic and respectable. To read these brilliant details is like standing on the Olympian threshold and gazing at the ineffable brightness within." HOMERIC SYNCHRONISM. An inquiry into the Time and Place of Homer. Crown Svo. 6j. "/if »J impossible not to admire the immense range of thought and inquiry which the author has displayed." — British Quarterly Review. Goethe and Mendelssohn {1S21— 1831). Translated from the German of Dr. Karl Mendelssohn, Son of the Composer, by M. E. Von Glehn. From the Private Diaries and Home Letters of Mendelssohn, with Poems and Letters of Goethe never before printed. Also with two New and Original Portraits, Fac- similes, and Appendix of Twenty Letters hitherto unpublished. Crown Svo. 5^. Second Edition, enlarged. 12 MACMILLAN'S CATALOGUE OF WORKS IN •' . . . Every page is full of interest, not merely to the musi- cian, but to the general reader. The book is a very charming one, on eum. " The only elaborate and valuable book 7ve have had Jbr many years treating generally of the people of the Celestial Empire." — Academy. Green. — Works by John Richard Green:— HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE. Vol. I.— Early England — Foreign Kings — The Charter — The Parliament. With 8 Coloured Maps. 8vo. its, VoL II. — The Monarchy, 1461 — 1540 ; the Restoration, 1540 — 1603. 8vo. i6j. Vol. III. — Puritan England, 1603 — 1660; thej Revolution, 1660 — 16S8. With 4 Maps. 8vo. ids. [Vol. I J', in the press. "Mr. Green has done a work which probably no one but himself could have done. He has read and assimilated the results of all the labours of studettts during the last half century in the field oj English history, and has given them a fresh meaning by his awn independent study. He has fused together by the force of sympathetic imagination all that he has so HISTORY, BIOGRAPHY, TRAVELS, ETC. 13 Green. — contimied. collected, and has ^iven us a vivid and forcible sketch of the march of English histoiy. His book, both in Us aims and its cucomplishments, rises far beyond any of a similar kind, and it will give the colouring to the popular view to English history for some time to come." — Examiner. A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE. With Coloured Maps, Genealogical Tables, and Chronological Annals. Cro\vn 8vo. 8j. (>d. Sixty-third Thousand. " To say that Air. Green's book is better than those which have pre- ceded it, would be to cottvey a very inadequate impression of its merits. It stands alone as the one general history of the country, for the sake of which all others, if young and old are luise, will be speedily and surely set aside." STRAY STUDIES FROM ENGLAND AND ITALY. Crown 8vo. ?>s. 6d. Containing : Lambeth and the Archbishops — The Florence of Dante — Venice and Rome — Early History of Oxford — The District Visitor — Capri — Hotels in the Clouds — Sketches in Sunshine, &c. " One and all of the papers are eminently readable^'' — Athen^UM. Guest. — LECTURES ON THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND. By M. J. Guest. With Map?. Crown 8vo. 6j. " The book is pleasant reading, it is full of information, much of it is valuable, most of it is correct, told in a gossipy and intelligible way." — Atiien^um. Hamerton. — Works by p. G. Hamerton:— THE INTELLECTUAL LIFE. With a Portrait of Leonardo da Vinci, etched by Leopold, Flameng. Second Edition. Crown los. 6d. 8vo. " We have read the whole book with great pleasure, and zve can re- cojnmend it strongly to all who can appreciate grave reflections on a very important subject, excelletitly illustrated from the resources of a mind stored zvith much reading and much keen obseivation of real life." — Saturday Review. THOUGHTS ABOUT ART. New Edition, revised, with an Introduction. Crown 8vo. 2>s. 6d. '^ A manual of sound and thorough criticism on art." — STANDARD. Hill. — THE RECORDER OF BIRMINGHAM. A Memoir of Matthew Davenport Hill, with Selections from his Correspondence, By his Daughters Rosamond and Florence Davenport-Hill. With Portrait engraved by C. H. Jeens. 8yo. l6s. 14 MACMILLAN'S CATALOGUE OF WORKS IN Hill.— WHAT WE SAW IN AUSTRALIA. By Rosamond and Floren'CE Hill. Crown 8vo. los. dd. " May be recommended as an interesting and truthful picture cf the condition of those lends which are so distant and vet so much like home" — Saturday Review. Hodgson.— MEMOIR OF REV. FRANCIS HODGSON, B. D., Scholar, Poet, and Divine. By his Son, the Rev. James T. Hodgson, M.A. Containing numerous Letters from Lord Byron and others. With Portrait engraved by Jeens. Two Vols. Crown 8vo. l8x. " A book that has added so much of a healthy nature to our ktunuledge of Byron, and that contains so rich a store of delightful correspondence" — Athen^um. Hole.— A GENEALOGICAL STEMMA OF THE KINGS OF ENGLAND AND FRANCE. By the Rev. C. Hole, M.A,, Trinity College, Cambridge. On Sheet, \s. A BRIEF BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY. Compiled and Arranged by the Rev. Charles Hole, M.A. Second Edition. i8mo. 4f. (id. Hooker and Ball. — MAROCCO AND THE GREAT ATLAS: Journal of a Tour in. By Sir Joseph D. Hooker, K.C.S.L, C.B., F.R.S., &c., and John Ball, F.R.S. With an Appendix, including a Sketch of the Geology of Marocco, by G. Maw, F.L.S., F.G.S. With Illustrations and Map. 8vo. 2IJ. " // is long since any more interesting book of travels has issued from our press." — Saturday Review. " This is, without doubt, one of the most interesting and valuable books of travel published for many years." —Spectator. Hozier (H. M.) — Works by CAPTAIN Henry M. Hozikr, late Assistant Military Secretary to Lord Napier of Magdala : — THE SEVEN WEEKS' WAR ; Its Antecedents and Incidents. Nro) and Cheaper Edition. With New Preface, Maps, and Plans. Crown 8vo. hs. THE INVASIONS OF ENGLAND : a History of the Past, with Lessons for the Future. Two Vols. 8vo. i'is. Hiibner.— A RAMBLE ROUND THE WORLD IN 1871. By M. Le Baron HOb.ner, formerly Ambassador and Minister. Translated by Lady Herbert. New and Cheaper Edition. With numerous Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 6j. " // is difficult to do ample justice ti this pleasant narrative 0/ travel .'. . , ii does not contain a single dull paragraph." — Morning Post. HISTORY, BIOGRAPHY, TRAVELS, ETC. 15 Hughes. — Works by Thomas Hughes, Q.C, Author of "Tom Brown's School Days." ALFRED THE GREAT. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 6j. MEMOIR OF A BROTHER. With Portrait of George Hughes, after Watts. Engraved by Jeens. Crown 8vo. 5^. Sixth Edition. " The boy who can read this book without deriving from it some addi- tional impulse towards honourable, manly, and independent conduct, has no good stuff in him." — Daily News. Hunt.— HISTORY OF ITALY. By the Rev. W. Hunt, M.A. Being the Fourth Volume of the Historical Course for Schools. Edited by Edward A. Freeman, D.C.L. i8mo. 3^. " Mr. Hunt gives us a most compact but very readable little book, con- taining in small compass a very complete outline of a complicated and perplexing subject. It is a book which may be safely recommended to others besides schoolboys." — ^JoHN Bull. Irving.— THE ANNALS OF OUR TIME. A Diurnal of Events, Social and Political, Home and Foreign, from the Accession of Queen Victoria to the Peace of Versailles. By Joseph Irving. Fourth Edition. 8vo. half-bound. i6j. ANNALS OF OUR TIME. Supplement. From Feb. 28, 1871, to March 19, 1874. 8vo. 4?. dd. ANNALS OF OUR TIME. Second Supplement. From March, 1874, to the Occupation of Cyprus. 8vo. 4J. 6d. " We have before us a trusty and ready guide to the events of the past thirty years , available equally for the statesman, the politician, th'e public writer, and the general reader." — Times. James.— Works by Henry James, Jun. FRENCH POETS AND NOVELISTS. Crown 8vo. &r. 6d. Contents: — Alfred de Alusset ; Theophile Gautier ; Baudelaire; Honore de Balzac ; George Sand ; TJie Two Amplres ; Turgenieff, &=c. Johnson's Lives of the Poets. — The Six Chief Lives — Milton, Dryden, Swift, Addison, Pope, Gray. With Macaulay's " Life of Johnson." Edited, with Pi-eface, by Matthew Arnold. Crown 8vo. 6s. Killen. — ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY OF IRELAND, from the Earliest Date to the Present Time. By W. D. Killen, D.D., President of Assembly's College, Belfast, and Professor of Eccle- siastical History. Two Vols. 8vo. 25J. " Those who have the leisure zuill do well to read these ftvo volumes. Thev are full of interest, and are the result of great research. . . . IVe i6 MACMILLAN'S CATALOGUE OF WORKS IN have no JusUation in recommending the -work to all who wish to impxme their acquaintance with Irish history." — Spectator. Kingsley (Charles). — Works by the Rev. Charles Kingsley, M.A., Rector of Eversley aud Canon of Westminster. (For other Works by the same Author, see Theological and Belles Lettres Catalogues.) ON THE ANCIEN REGIME as it existed on the Continent before the French Revolution. Three Lectures delivered at the Royal Institution. Crown 8vo. 6j. AT LAST : A CHRISTMAS in the WEST INDIES. With aearly Fifty Illustrations. Sixth Edition. Crown 8vo. 6j. Mr. Kin^sley's dream of forty years was at last fulfilled, when he started on a Christmas expedition to the West Indies, for the purpose of becoming personally acquainted with the scenes which he has so vividly described in " Westward Ho !" These two volumes are the journal of his voyage. Records of natural history, sketches of tropical landscape, chapters on education, views of society, all find their place. *' We can only say that Mr. Kingsle^s account of a ' Christmas in the West Indies ' is in every way worthy to be classed among his happiest productions." — Standard. THE ROMAN AND THE TEUTON. A Series of Lectures delivered before the University of Cambridge. New and Cheaper Edition, with Preface by Professor Max Muller. Crown 8vo. 6s. f LAYS AND PURITANS, and other Historical Essays. With Portrait of Sir Walter Raleigh. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. In addition to the Essay mentioned in the title, this volume contains other two — one on "Sir Walter Raleigh and his Time," and one on Froudis '^ History of England." Kingsley (Henry).— tales OF OLD TRAVEL. Re- narrated by Henry Kingsley, F.R.G.S. With Eight Illus- trations by HUARD. Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo. 5j. *' We know no better book for those who want knowledge or seek to refresh it. As for the ' sensational,^ most novels are tame compared with these narratives'' — Athen^euiiI. Lang. — CYPRUS : Its History, its Present Resources and Future Prospects. By R. Hamilton Lang, late H.M. Consul for the Island of Cjrprus. With Two Illustrations and Four Maps. 8vo. I4J. " The fair qt:d impartial account of her past and present to be found in these pages has an undoubted claim on the attention of all intelligent rftrd. Yonge (Charlotte M.)— works by Charlotte M. Yonge, Author of "The Heir of RedclyfTe," &c, &c. :— A PARALLEL HISTORY OF FRANCE AND ENGLAND : consisting of Outlines and Dates. Oblong 4to. 3J. 6d. CAMEOS FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. From RoUo to Edward II. Extra fcap. 8vo. Third Edition. 5j. Second Series, THE WARS IN FRANCE. Extra fcap. 8vo. Third Edition. 5j. Third Series, THE WARS OF THE ROSES. Extra fcap. 8vo. 5j. " Instead of dry details" says the NONCONFORMIST, " we have living pictures, faithful, livid, and striking." Fourth Series. Reformation Times. Extra fcap. 8vo. 5J. HISTORY OF FRANCE. Maps. i8mo. 3J. 6f modern, and especially of English, government and society." PAUPERISM : ITS CAUSES AND REMEDIES. Crown 8vo. SJ. 6eeman (E. A.), M.A., D.C.L.— comparative POLITICS. Lectures at the Royal Institution, to which is added " The Unity of History," being the Rede Lecture delivered at Cambridge in 1872. 8vo. 14^. " IVe find in Mr. Freeman'' s new volume the same sound, careful, omprehensive qualities which have long ago raised him to so high a place mongst historical writers. For historical discipline, then, as well as •istorical information, Mr. Freeman^ s book is full of value." — Pall riALL Gazette. aOSChen. — REPORTS AND SPEECHES ON LOCAL TAXA- TION. By George J. GoscHEN, M.P. Royal 8vo. 5.^ " The volume contains a vast mass of information ef th^ highest value." —Athenaeum. jUide to the Unprotected, in Every Day Matters Re- lating to Property and Income. By a Banker's DAUGHTER. Fourth Edition, Revised. Extra fcap. Svo. 3^. ()d. 34 MACMILLAN'S CATALOGUE OF "Many an unprotected female will bless the head which planned and the hand which compiled this admirable little manual. . . . 7 his booh was very much wanted, and it could not have been better done." — Morning Star. Hamilton.— MONEY and VALUE: an Inquiry into the Means and Ends of Economic Production, with an Appendix on the Depreciation of Silver and Indian Currency. By Rowland Hamilton. 8vo. lac " The subject is here dealt with in a luminous style, and by presenting it from a new point of view in connection with the nature and functions of money, a genuine service has been rendered to commercial science." — British Quarterly Review. HarwOOd. — disestablishment : a Defence of the Principle of a National Church. By George Harwood, M.A. 8vo. 12s. Hill. — OUR COMMON LAND : and other Short Essays. By OcTAViA Hill. Extra fcap. 8vo. 3J. 6d. ^, , Contents: — Our Common Land. District Visiting: A More Excellent Way of Charity. A Word on Good Citizenship. Open Spaces. Effectual Charity. The Future of our Commons. Historicus.— LETTERS ON SOME QUESTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. Reprinted from the Times, with considerable Additions. 8vo. ^s.' fid. Also, ADDITIONAL LETTERS. 8vo. Zf. 6*/. Holland.— THE TREATY RELATIONS OF RUSSIA AND TURKEY FROM 1774 TO 1853. A Lecture delivered at Oxford, April 1877. By T. E. Holland, D.C.L., Professor of Inter- national Law and Diplomacy, Oxford. Crown 8vo. 2J. Hughes (Thos.)— THE OLD CHURCH : WHAT SHALL WE DO WITH IT? By Thomas Hughes, Q.C. Crown 8vo. 6j. Jcvons. — Works by W. Stanley Jevons, M.A., Professor of Political Economy in Uuivereity College, London. (For other Works by the same Author, see Educational and Philo- sophical Catalogues.) THE THEORY OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. Second Edition, revised, with new Preface and Appendices. 8vo. loj. 6