'M^Mmmmm BATH CHARACTERS; SKETCHES FROM LIFE. nulled t>y T. 1MV1SU.N, Whitefriart. (T, the first, and the last, in the energies of the divine mind. To these excmplaria Graca did I dedicate, for six successive years, the light of the day, and the silence of the night, in exact obedience to the rule pre- scribed by one of the first masters of study that ever existed \ nocturnd versare mami, versare diurna. Draw. All this may be true, sir, but still it is below my dignity to hold conver- sation with you, for you cannot deny that you are an heretic and an apostate. Skip. An heretic, quotha ! That is as much as to say, because I don't look i 114 through your spectacles, I can't see at all. You have not lived to these years, I sup- pose, without knowing what the difference is between orthodoxy and heterodoxy; that the one is my own doxy y and the latter, another man's doxy*. So much for heresy : and, with respect to apostacy ) was I to * A laughable circumstance occurred two or three years ago amongst the orthodox divines at Bath, which, puts their claim to infallibility upon nearly as respectable a foundation as that of Lord Peter himself. An honest curate, more conscientious than politic, had given no little disgust to his rector, and his right-hand man, Drawcansir, by a style of preaching, which, from its earnestness, they chose to call mefhodistical. Like the high-priests and scribes of old, they had taken the pre- caution of emptying hearers who might entrap Inm in his -words. A sermon, at length, was reported to them of a most culpable nature, and full of methodistical abomination. At the instigation of Drawcamir, th unfortunate discourse was demanded by the rector. Fag, the curate, submitted to the requisition-. A synod was held upon its spirit and tendency. Judgment was pronounced upon it, and the curate informed, that it should be immediately transmitted to the diocesan. He made no objection to the appeal, but requested that a strip of pdper might be sent to his Lordship at the same time, which contained a, reference to tie works of 115 blame, think you, for quitting a company of which I had been long ashamed* f Could I have remained in such society with a quiet conscience, depend upon it I should have knowil my own interest better than to have left it. But I was too honest to be paid for the performance of duties which I hired another person to fulfil ; and to preach doctrines which were contrary to the articles of the churck\. No, no, I'm feishop Hopkins, where might be found, verbatim et li- teratim, the whole of the anathematized sermon ! So much for orthodoxy ! * There are those who ill-naturedly insinuate that this was not a disinterested resignation. I hey tell us, that the doctortoad incurred no less than eleven penalties on the qiii tarn act, for non- residence ; and as the pa- rishioners threatened to sue for them if he did not resign, he chose the lesser evil of the two, and gave up a living that was hardly worth holding, rather than incur the heavy mulct of the statute. EDITOR. f- One very favorite topic of declamation with this petulant little divine is, as I am informed, the fault* and errors of the clergy of the establishment, and the defects of the system itself. Being permitted, a few months ago, to ascend the pulpit of Lady Huntingdon's chapel, (the wretched ranters of which generally keep I 2 It6 not like one of your own fraternity, who is well known to entertain the same senti- up the same senseless cry,) he dared to befoul the cloth with the most impertinent censures, to calumniate the stablishment, and speak evil of its dignities Now, though I am far from being the champion of the church- ministry in every respect ; though I cannot attempt to excuse the rapacity of some, in the matter of tythts ; the want of conscience of others, in absenting themselves from their livings; the priestly pride, pomp, ambition, and intolerance of 'a third set j though I do not say a word in favour of clerical proprietors of fashionable chapels; fox-hunting parsons ; card-playing doctors ; or drunken curates ; yet this I will be bold to assert, that, take the English clergy as an aggregate, no other pro- fession, or body of men, will be able to produce so many examples, as they can produce, of piety of life, pureness of manners, extent, variety, and depth of learning ; soundness of philosophy ; and what crowns the whole, liberality of sentiment. It seems, also, that the doctrines of the established ministry, as they are generally delivered from our pulpits, are the frequent subjects of this pert doctor's ridicule and reprehension^ If, indeed, rationality and simplicity ; mildness and temperance j freedom from the impiety of Calvinism j the wildness of enthusiasm ; and the dismal darkness of fanaticism, characterize anlichristian doctrines, I am willing to concede that the great body of English Ar~ minian divines are the most heterodox set of men in the 117 ments with myself, and yet continues to make one of the herd which he continually world j but if, on the other hand, it be the duty of the ministers of religion, to unfold to their hearers the pure, simple, and rational truths of the gospel; to irradiate their minds with the cheering, comfortable, and re- freshing beams of its heavenly light $ to press upon their consciences the obligation of fulfilling its beautiful precepts ; to kindle their love by representations of the divine goodness ; to awaken their gratitude by views of God's compassion j to inflame their piety, and confirm their virtue by plain and forcible recitals of the terms of salvation; then 1 think I may fairly assume, that no body of spiritual teachers under Heaven can boast so conscientious a fulfilment of their pastoral duties as the established clergy of this land. The doctor in question, I understand, professes an intimate acquaintance with the fathers of the church. I, also, in my time, have dabbled a little with this venerable fraternity ; and many passages from their writings remain on my recollection which were imprinted there, by the good sense and liberal spirit by which, when I read them, they ap- peared to me to have been dictated. I submit them to his attention, that, haply, he may lower the tone of his high doctrines, and lessen that conceit in the infallibi- lity of his own notions, which, I am well informed, he entertains. St. Jerome. Sola script urarum ars est quam sibi omnes passim vc ndicant ; hance garrula anus, hanc DELIRUS SENEX, hanc sopJiista, verbosus, hunc vniverfi 118 abuses. However, nothing better could be expected from the tender conscience oF pr&sumant, lacerant, docent antequam Jiscunt. To teach religion seems to be the only art which does not require common sense in the exercise of it ; hence it happens that every old woman, aged dotard, and noisy declaimer, take upon them to instruct others in what they do not themselves understand ; and the consequence of it is, as he observes in another place, Quicquid dixerint hoc legem Dei putant; that, whatsoever they assert, they think (or pretend) has been dictated by the spirit of God. Such men as these (according to St. Basil), zv vpto-ifoirjtrou ^W r i' eu} f ra zo-vtv rt&F svffafyturiv ; " pretending to in- terpret, only palm upon us their own conceits." " There are persons," says Isidorus Pclusiota, roc. yap py avrcv eipy^evy, exfiiafyusvoi, KKI ra ae much more safe for you than the verdict 131 of a special jury. ^Besides, his lordship of the Fens will here lend you his assistance; and so far befriend you, that if he cannot prove your case, he'll at least take half the odium of defeat from your shoulders. Let me advise you, therefore, to ask aid of the bishop instead of the chief justice ; and as you are a great admirer of the Fathers, to adopt on all occasions the sage hint of Ignatius : to do nothing without the co-operation of his fads/rip.- APPENDIX. AWARE that it is far beneath the dignity of an author (and such the publication of a book permits me, I trow, to denominate my- self) to notice animadversions upon his productions, circulated through the chan- nel of an obscure and contemptible pro- vincial paper, I deem it necessary, before I thus degrade the profession, to deprecate the wrath of my brethren of the quill, by humbly craving their pardon upon my of- fence, and binding myself by the most solemn promise, that, after this one devia- tion from the regulations of the literary corps, I will, in no wise, and upon no oc casion, descend for one moment, in word or deed, from the lofty self-importance of our venerable calling. They will, I flatter my- lelf, consider the act (what it really is) as a 154 sacrifice of 'dignity injustice; and therefore! pardon the sin, though they cannot sympa- thize with the feeling that occasioned it. In the Bath Heralds of Nov. 27th, Dec. 4tli and l^th, appeared the following letters and notes. TO THE PRINTER OF THE BATH HERALD. No. I. SIR, Nov. 25, 1807. As no man can approve his being exhi- bited to his fellow-citizens as an object of animadversion or derision, it is natural for an individual, on whose character an attack of this kind is made, to endeavour to find out his aggressor. Indeed the public at large is in some degree interested in such a discovery; since what is one man's fate to- day, may be another's to-morrow. Not to speak of directly scandalous misrepresenta- tions, where are the persons so exempt from failings, that may not be either exag- 135 gerated by the tongue of envy and slander, or distorted through the medium of ridicule and satire, so as to gratify the too general malignity of the human heart? For this reason, it is laudahle to acquire, by proper means, an information which may be bene- ficial to our neighbours in general ; and who would not wish to be able to say of the author of a late mischievous publica- tion, which may have disturbed private peace, and has undoubtedly excited much public curiosity Foenum habet in cornu longe fuge ? The great misfortune is, that in the avidity of such an inquiry, the innocent too often suffers for the guilty; and I yesterday wit- nessed an abuse of this kind (originating no doubt with one of the lowest of the multitude) which ought not to pass un- noticed the name of a most respectable gentleman, together with his place of re- sidence, was inscribed on the walls of some of the most frequented parts of this town, 1361 , Peter Paul Pallet, 29, Circus. Now all who have the pleasure of knowing the gentleman alluded to, are convinced that he possesses too much dignity of mind to employ his eminent talents in so servile and illiberal a work; but they know also, that a consciousness of his integrity will lead him to despise in silence, rather than conde- scend personally to remove, any suspicions of the nature above mentioned, which may be floating in the higher circles of society. Hence, with a view to arrive at the know- ledge of the real writer of the Bath Cha- racters, I beg leave to suggest, that the intimate friends of this gentleman would do well, on his authority, to contradict, in the most express manner, the base insinuation which has been circulated with no small degree of activity. In consequence of this, investigation will be directed with increased zeal into other channels, success may attend its efforts, and a proper odium light on the head of the person who justly merits it I am, sir, yours, &c. DICAIOPHILOS. 137 No. II. MR. PRINTER, Nov. 30, 1807. SINCE writing the letter which you apo- logized for omitting last week, I am happy to find that my apprehension of not being able to obtain a personal and public con- tradiction to the rumour so prevalent is in a great degree removed. I read with much pleasure in that paper, Mr. Thomas Fal- coner's distinct and positive disavowal of any knowledge of the author of the last dialogue in the Bath Characters, in conse- quence of its having been ascribed to him. Such a conduct is to be commended as liberal, and worthy of a respectable mem- ber of society. I am only sorry it does not extend so far as to spare him all further trouble in this disagreeable business; for it is proper he should be informed, that from his only declaring the fifth dialogue was not his composition, the other four are now ascribed to him, and his father, as a joint production. Hence he will no doubt have the goodness to satisfy the public, jn 138 * the same laudable manner, on this allega- tion; as a total silence -would lead to the inevitable conclusion, that one or both are concerned in writing the whole or Some part of the said dialogues. Indeed, that same justice to the author, with a proper sense of which Mr. Falconer is so strongly impressed as to make the first disavowal, will no doubt equally induce him to make the second, in every respect as much, if not more, necessary. No. III. Chatham-Row, Dec. 10, ISO/. I)R. SHEPPARD informs the author of a late scurrilous publication, that he has in- serted what is not true of two other cha- racters; Dr. S. was in London at the tirrie when Dr. Haweis (whom it is presumed he calte Dr. Vineyards) took the living of Aid winkle. He heard the story from the 1/39 mouths of Dr. Madan and Mr. Kimpton* Kimpton was a dissenter; he bad Aid winkle to dispose of, the rector being dead. Tbe benefice was valued at ^1000. Kimpton bad two-thirds of the said living, and he borrowed 300 of Mr. Savage, of Spital- fields, to purchase the other share. Mr. Savasce told Dr. S. this himself. He could O not sell it till within a week of its lapse to the bishop. If a patron does not present within six months to a living, the bishop of the diocese has a right to present. Kimpton applied to Dr. Madan, late of the Lock chapel, London, for advice; he never told Dr. Madan or Dr. Haweis his circum- stances, that he was a poor man, and coukl not afford to give the living away. Mr. Madan recommended to him his curate, Dr. Haweis. Kimpton said he would pre- sent Dr. Haweis, if he would resign the living as soon as he could sell it. Dr. O Haweis was asked if he would take it on these terms. He answered, if he would give it to him out mid out he would take it, not otherwise. Kimpton took a day or 140 two to consider of it, and then came and presented it. Six months afterwards he published a pamphlet, implying that he was an injured man, and robbed of his living. Mr. Madan answered ; let it be known that it is simony by our ecclesiastic laws to buy a living, the incumbent being dead : it is also simony to take a living with a promise of resignation, in order that the same may be sold. A clamour in- stantly arose in the religious world against Mr. Madan, as the adviser of Kimpton ; and Dr. Haweis, for taking the said living. It was brought upon the stage in a play called the FTypocrite. Laely Huntingdon hearing of the circumstances of Kimpton, gave him a thousand pounds for the said living. This is the truth. Some con- demned, others approved, of the conduct of Dr, Haweis. No. IV. ArcoTifER untruth is told of Dr. Vege* table. The gentleman supposed to be al- 141 luded to has two curates; to one he gives 100. per ann. that is, the said curacy is made up so much, though the salary is only 75. per ann. To the other he gives 50. per ann. for single duty. No. V. THE printer has just received a long letter, with the London post-mark, signed P. P. P. evidently the production of a writer who has lately acquired considerable notoriety in this city. In the hurry at- tending the day of publication, especially when the arrival of the mail is retarded by the weather, the author will be satisfied with this remark that this letter requires most mature consideration. To satisfy, how- ever, the public on the import of this epistle, the printer states that it chiefly re- lates to what P. P. P. calls the unjustifiable means everted in discovering the author of the Bath Characters. "The secret," he says, " of the author, is locked in his own 142 breast, and will probably die with him: it is known not even to his publisher; and this letter will no more lead you or any person to a discovery, than if it dropped from the moon." Friday morn. Now for our defence and remarks. After unequivocally asserting that I am not the author of the letter alluded to in No. 5, nor acquainted at all with the per- son that wrote it, I proceed to an examina- tion of the other delectable morceaux of criticism and reprehension \ inverting the order in which they stand above, and dragging them to the slaughter-house, as the rogue Cacus did the oxen of Hercules, with the tail foremost: Cauda in speluqcam tractosj Or, to be more explicit, adopting the wrnpvp'npvi a figure of rhetoric, well known to the English reader, under the familiar phrase of " putting the cart before the, horse." 143 With respect to No. 4, my remarks shall be as brief as its subject will allow then) to be Qui capit ille facit. If the gentle- man to whom the writer of that paragraph Alludes can say, THAT his northern curacy was at no time during his incumbency so low as five or six guineas per annum; and that it was not raised to its present amount jn consequence of the act of parliament for increasing the wages of journeymen, parsons THAT he did not swear and engage at his ordination, and institution to his livings, to " feed and tend the flock committed to his care," and "minister the discipline of Christ as the Lord has commanded" THAT he conscientiouly believes he is as bene- ficially employed (I do not mean to himself, but to the community) in dealing out tropes and figures from the richly-embroidered and velvet-coated pulpit of his grand chapel at Bath, to the Dut chess of this ; the Lady that; and the Lordknows-who; as he would be in telling a plain tale of Christian duty to bis own proper congregations THAT he seriously thinks he is serving his heavenly 144 master (to whose service he has most so. lernnly dedicated himself) as faithfully and effectually at the routes and card-tables at Bath, as he would be were he instructing the ignorant; comforting the sick; reliev- ing the. poor; and solacing the afflicted in the parishes from whence he draws his tythes * ; I would then allow that he is an * The evil tendency (for I say nothing of the want of moral and concientious feeling in those who practise it) of this base dereliction of their flocks by the beneficed clergy, must be sufficiently manifest to any man of common un- derstanding: and we can hardly determine whether it be more characterized by dishonesty or impolicy. But the practice is not confined, it seems, to the higher species of ecclesiastics} it pervades the genus, and parish clerks, imitating the example of their masters, are now as guilty of non-residence, as the most careless priests of the esta- blishment. At a vestry held a few weeks ago in a large parish in Bath, a complaint having been presented of the enormous sums exacted for the fees of the parson and his clerk, poor sol-fa was called to an account for his extortion. " 1 is not to blame," said the sagacious servant of the church, " Maister has aal my fees. I beant clark, but the clerk's daputy; and who he is, the lord only, and the parson knows." Astonished at this information,* the chairman of the vestry demanded an explanation of the rector, tf Oh, sir !" returned the incumbent, " by UQ 145 injured man, and would expunge the second dialogue from the next edition of the characters. " Oh! fye upon it, fye upon it!" How can an incumbent justify to himself such a mode of carrying on traders this? or, how can a diocesan answer it to his conscience (in defiance of a late act of parliament, and a recent order of the privy-council) to wink at such proceedings? We need look no further for the increase of sectaries, and the progress of schism ; nor longer wonder* that even the holy zeal of the disinterested Drawcansir himself has been unable hither- to to lessen the numbers of the one, or check the march of the other. As to No. 3, I shall not long detain trie means an uncommon case. The clerkships of such parishes as these, are too valuable things to be given to vulgar men. We generally bestow them upon some poor relations ; give them as portions to younger sons j or dispose of them for a good round sum of ready money. The office does not require residence j and the gentleman who holds the one in question, is now living by the fees of that, and the profits of his own profcssion t in Lincoln's* 146 reader. From the entire dissimilarity of Df. Sheppard's friend's case, and that of Dr. Vineyards, it is manifest to any one with half an eye, that the former could not have sat for the portrait, which I have given under the name of the latter. I shall, however, venture to say, that Dr. Vine- yards is a rigid likeness of his original, if any authority may be attributed to the generally-received popular axiom, WHAT EVERY BODY SAYS MUST BE TRUE. With the author of the letter No. 4, I should be inclined to express myself in very indignant terms, were it not my plan, as well as my nature, to laugh rather than to scold. I cannot, however, pass it over without observing, that the writer of it must be considered as having taken a step equally insolent and unjustifiable, and the publisher of it as deserving the most serioifs censure, in daring to hold out to obnoxious notice, and public discussion, two respect- able names as the supposed authors of a work which, in another letter, he considers as deserving general odium. Happily, the dignity of character, and solid worth of 147 both these gentlemen, stand upon too broad and subtantial a basis to be shaken by the blast of calumny, or undermined by the secret sap of sly insinuation; for, if com- mon report (rny only means of knowledge on the subject) have given me true inform- ation respecting them, their high attain- ments, and excellent qualities; the virtue, probity, capacity, and knowledge of the father; and the integrity, consistency, honor, and talents of the son, must place them far above the suspicion of any act, which even the most distorted or fastidious eye could consider as reprehensible. But enough of this. I may say with Junius; "I am not conversant in the language of panegyric. These praises are extorted from me: but they will wear well; for, they have been dearly earned." I come now to notice the letter No. I. Its writer it seems is a lover of justice (for so his signature imports*); then justice let him have. Fiat Justitia ruat coelum. * Would you believe, reader, that this disinterested L2 148 Fully satisfied as I am, that moral worth and virtue cannot be rendered ridiculous by all the arts of satire, I confess I do not see either the disgrace or impropriety of exercising an instrument, whose injurious influence will not extend beyond the pre- cincts of Folly and Vice. It was under this impression that I took up my pen to essay its powers of moral casfigation, and I am hardened enough to acknowledge, that I feel content with the modem which it has carried on its attacks, and with the results which these have produced. It has held up none as " objects of animadversion or derision," except such as well deserved either the blame or contempt of " their fellow-citizens." It has not dealt in " scan- dalous misrepresentations;" nor "exag- gerated failings" beyond their real magni- tude, since the general voice has pro- nounced that its likenesses are drawn with the most striking exactness. It cannot have ''disturbed the private peace" of any lover of justice (as I have within this hour been informed by letter) is no other than the truly apostolical Dr. Vegetable himself? 149 family, because the objects of its attacks are only those habits of profligacy or folly, with the existence of which domestic happi- ness is altogether incompatible. Had I, indeed, attempted to excite the laugh, or direct the finger of scorn at honorable principle, modest merit, or ho- nest industry; had I wantonly sported with the good man's feeling, or even the virtuous man's " failings :" had I, to " gra- tify the too general malignity of the human heart," broken in, ruffian-like, upon the sacred circle of domestic felicity, ridiculed its charities, or endeavoured to blast its innocent joys ; then should I most justly have " merited" all ' the odium" that Di- kaiophilos is willing to accumulate upon my head, and have felt myself compelled to acknowledge, that his classical scrap applied to me with the most happy pro- priety. But, will the world allow (and to that I make my appeal, in preference to a writer who is evidently himself one of the stricken " deer"), will the world allow, I say, that I deserve odium for an attempt, 150 however feeble, in times so " big with fate" as the present unparalleled ones, to arrest the progress of profligacy and irreligion ; to shame the insolence of vanity and folly; to abash the lofty spirit of an immoral dis- sipation, and an emasculating luxury, which insult the wretchedness of the poor, wound the feelings of the good, and awaken the alarms of every reflecting mind in the kingdom ? Will the wise, the judicious, and the honorable, condemn me for tear- ing the mask from the face of hypocrisy ; and exposing the pernicious humbug, and the vain pretensions of quackery, empiri- cism, and charktanerie ? NO : Indivi- duals who feel the sin ait of the lash may complain of the " malignity" of its appli- cation ; but the plain honesty and sober common sense of the public will pronounce without hesitation, that strict just ice guides the hand which wields it. In the estimation, however, of the letter- writer, it seems that I ought to be de- nounced as the enemy of society, at least '? amongst the higher circles ; and 151 " Pursued with havock in the tyrannous hunt," till " the increased zeal of investigation" after my birth, parentage, and education, name, and place of abode, shall have been, attended with success ; " and a proper odium" be at length imposed " upon the head of the person who has so justly me- rited it." From the mode which I have adopted in publishing my volume, it is far from probable that its author should be dis- covered. But, whether or not this shall be the case, I would inform this diligent en- quirer after the true P. P. Pallet, that I am not very careful as to the result of this industrious search. As I have never at- tached much value to the " Smile of villains, or the praise of fools," so neither am I solicitous to deprecate their odium. But little accustomed to fear any thing, save the rebukes of my con- science and the displeasure of the good, and far from anticipating that these conse- quences would follow the detection of the real author of the dialogues ; the indigna- tion of such characters as the letters-writer, would only awaken in my mind the emo- tion of contempt. I foresee, indeed, that " the higher circles," to which he seems to affix peculiar importance, would partake in the resentful feelings of Dikaiophilos tor wards the true P. P. Pallet ; but even this mighty misfortune would lie lightly on my spirit. LONG CONVINCED THAT TO THEIR DEGENERATE PRINCIPLES AND DISSO- LUTE MANNERS MAY BE TRACED ALL THE MORAL AND POLITICAL EVILS OF MY DEGRADED AND UNHAPPY COUNTRY, I have ceased to regard them with feelings of attachment and respect. Satisfied with the valuable familiar intercourse of a Jew kindred spirits, I want neither the friend- ship nor esteem of the Like Judas, bartering honesty for pence; Whose title-page, xar' e3%ijv, proclaims Your sole dominion over learning's realms ; And, strange to tell, confines most modestly All British criticism to your garrets high : Whose eagle-ey'd sagacity perceives Treasons and plots 'mid Pallet's harmless leaves : Here sees the " foul fiend" Jacobin, and there Detects the vile Sociman, bold and bare*. * That distant ages may determine the extent of my uncle's obligations to the editors of the British Critic, (for with Ovid 1 may say, Jamqueopus exegi (Anglice edited} : quod nee Jovis ira t nee igner, Nee poteritferru.nl, nee eda.v abolere vflustas.) I think it but justice both to Jus fame and their reputation, to rescue their remarks from the perishable pamphlet in which they are at. present contained, and subjoin them to a work which must neces* sarily be, all but immortal. It will probably be considered as a tile offering to the Manes of my deceased relative, but 'tis all that a poor journeyman-printer has to bestow; His saltern accumukm donis, etfungar 2NANI Munere. " That a tract so very contemptible as this should have engaged fcmch attention, can only be accounted for, from the very preva- lent taste for defamation. The writer 1 , by some of his opponents, had been called an infidel ; but this edition contains his confession of faith, by which it appears, that he is a Socinian, or Rationalist: and like the rest of that tribe, furiously hostile to the established church, and to all who hold any thing more than the curtailed and mutilated faith of their inrention. We hare very littlt 161 Oh ! that ray feeble goose-quill were endued With power to pay that debt of gratitude, Which criticism such as yours demands (So just, so learned) from an author's hands ! When first your observations met my eye, (The united work of your fraternity 3) doubt in our own minds, who the real author is. Nor have we much more doubt, that though other characters are intermixed, to give liveliness and currency to the satire, the real object of it is, to vilify the established church ; and particularly a mart of the highest character, who has distinguished himself by his able writings in its behalf. The author has, at the same time, no objection to abuse nobility, (do the Reverend gentlemen -allude to the casual mention of the Right Honourable Lord Ghastly?) and even gentry; for Jacobinism is a part of his trade; which, in- deed, is generally uited with Sociniahisrii. All this agrees with the person \\hom we have in our contemplation ; but we name him not, for fear of error ; and only recommend his publication to that which it deserves, and will doubtless meet, oblivion." Brit Critic for April 1808. p. 452. When the crude, partial, and interested decisions of nameless reviewers, men of no where; literary non-entities ; mere temporary creations of the booksel- lers, (" whose breath can make them, as their breath has made") shall be deemed of value sufficiently ponderous, to outweigh the solemn verdict of an English special jury; then, but not till then, will the Anti-Jacobin and Brit. Critic be able to convince the public, that excellence of character may be associated with a total disregard to the obligations of justice; and that the act of deliberate and malignant slander (rendered still more odious from the sordid motives which suggested it) is no proof of a man being radically base, mean, ami detestable. m 162 Where decent -ant in every line declares The gentlemanly pen of Rev'rend N ; And truth, and argument, and sense combin'd, Mark the vast powers of his mighty mind: Where polish' d sentences, and periods smart, Display his friends' confederated art; Gods ! how I reverenc'd my -uncle's pen, Which gain'd the notice of such learned men / - Had mighty Fate, in its behests, decreed, That he should live such wise remarks to read, How gladly would that grateful pen have striv'n To pay some tribute for the praises giv'n ! But since th' inexorable arm of death Has check'd at once, his goosequill and his breath ; On me, his representative, descends The duty of requiting all his friends. Take then, from me, this boon so justly due, Including you, and your admirers too. Let Humbug's crown adorn your wooden heads, Whilst Folly's cap shall grace the/oo* that reads. EDITOR, THE END. UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY F A 000023737