:\i^ C^' / I 2[i^^-'^' Vn /uA^ . yH liJi '""y^ ^^' •^y ^c^^ >r^ PORTRAIT OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE BY MARTIN DROESHOUT. Jitdiirtd Fac-timila from fht First Folio (162.'}). STRA TFORD-ON-A VON EDITION Fact and Fiction ABOUT Shakespeare WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF THE PLAYHOUSES, PLAYERS, AND PLAYWRIGHTS OF HIS PERIOD BY ALFRED C. CALMOUR AUTHOR OF "THE AMBER HEART" AND OTHER PLAYS AVITH NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS STRATFORD-ON-AVON : GEORGE BOYDEN LONDON : HENRY WILLIAMS, 48, OLD BAILEY K- TO MARGUERITE AND BRANDON THOMAS THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED BY THEIR FRIEND THE WRITER. INTRODUCTION So many attempts have been made to pom'tray the character of William Shakespeare and elucidate the text of his works, so much material has been collected and published by explorers in the field of Shakespearean lore, that little remains to be recorded by later chroniclers. In this account of the great dramatic poet and i)layer, I fear I must rely for interest more upon the manner in which I have marshalled my gleanings than upon the matter gleaned. Of no man has so much that is unreliable been wa*itten as about William Shakespeare. He lias been painted as a flawless divinity devoid of those traits we attribute to common humanity, and he has been depicted as a slothful drunkard with Falstaffian proclivities. That which I have written has been restricted to recorded evidences, and inspired by such information as I have acquired in the com'se of a labour of love. And if, by my narrative, I have directed any person how to become better acquainted with Shakespeare's work, and have thus awakened a corresponding enthusiasm for the author of some of the noblest and most beautiful thoughts in the English language, I shall, in some small measm-e, have repaid the deep debt of gratitude I owe to " our ever-li\dng poet." Alfred C. Calmour Stratford-on-Avon, 1894. CONTENTS Page. Richard Shakespeare 1 John Shakespeare 2 Marriage with Mary Anion 3 iJoniestic Siuronndings 4 John Shakespeare's prosperity ... 5 Occupation 6 Baptism of William Shakespeare 7 Tiie Art of Writing 8 Dramatic Entertainments at Stratford 10 The Earl of Leicester's Players.. 11 The Burbage Family | William Shakespeare's | 12 Education ) The Grammar School 13 Training at the Grannnar School 16 Shakespeare's Youthful Occupa- tion 19 Early Poetic Efforts 20 Wooing of Anne Hathaway 21 Marriage 23 Baptism of his Children 24 Shakespeare and Sir Thomas Lucy 25 Departure from Stratford 26 Burbage's Company Abi-oad 27 First Employment upon the Stage 28 Downes's Record 29 Robert Greene's Attack 30 Shakespeare's Progress 32 Henry VI 33 References to the Trade of Butcher 35 Atmosphere of the Play 37 Motive for Greene's Attack 38 Shakespeare's Plagiarisms 39 Chettle's Apology 41 Shakespeare's Reputation 42 The Early Theatres 43 Population of London 44 Conveyance to the Theatre ... \ .. Bills of the Play r° Rehearsals and Hour of the Play 46 Prices of Admission 47 Interior of Theatres 48 Scenery 49 Painting the Face 51 Costumes worn on the Stage 1 -g The Audience i Amusements at the Play 54 Page. Unauthorised printing of Plays 55 Venus and Adonis 56 Dedication of the Poem 57 Evidence in the Poem 58 The Literary value of the Poems and Plays 59 Friendship of the Earl of Southampton 61 His Generosity to Shakespeare.. 62 Shakespeare before Queen Elizabeth 63 Plays Performed on Sunday ... 64 Shakespeare's Rapid Rise 65 The Production of the Plays... 66 Player and Playwright I gg Richard Bui'bage I Actors in Shakespeare's Plays 69 Shakespeare as an Actor 70 Shakespeare before James I ... 71 Royal condescension to Shake- speare 72 Popularity of the Play 73 Thrift and Prudence of the Players 74 Shakespeare's Monopoly 75 The Poet's Share ) ^g Sharers and Hirelings | Salaries of Players 79 The Emolument of Play- wrights 80 Shakespeare's Family 82 Contemporary opinion of Shake- speare's work 83 Ben Jonson's testimony 86 Fuller's Account 88 The Davenant Incident 89 Manningham's Story 90 Shakespeare's Investments ... 91 Richard Quiney 92 Deaths of Richard and Edmund Shakespeare 93 Shakespeare's return to Strat- ford 96 Life at Stratford 97 Shakespeare's Will 99 Cause of Death 101 Burial 104 The Stratford Bust 105 Ben Jonson's testimony of admiration 106 Milton's Eulogy 1 iQg The First Folio ) The Droeshout Portrait Ill ILLUSTRATIONS. Ft'ontispiece : PORTRAIT OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE. MAP OF A PART OF WARWICKSHIRE (1G03). THE "BIRTHPLACE" IN HENLEY STREET. THE GUILD CHAPEL AND HALL. CHARLECOTE HALL. ROBERT GREENE IN CONCEIPT. MAP OF LONDON (1593). INTERIOR OF THE SWAN THEATRE (1596). INTERIOR OF THE RED BULL THEATRE (1672). GREENWICH PALACE. WILLIAM KEMP DANCING THE MORRIS. VIEW OF LONDON (1610). PORTRAIT OF BEN JONSON. THE GLOBE THEATRE (1614). SHAKESPEARE'S BUST IN STRATFORD CHURCH, TT has long been the custom, when extraordinary -*■ ability has developed in a man of humble origin, to seek in the parents for some trace of that quality of genius shown by the child, and in many cases this genealogical analysis has discovered that the ability was inherited. But in the case of Shakespeare the most exhaustive scrutiny of his ancestors has failed to show that their intelligence was on anything like a high intellectual plane, or that their tastes and habits materially differed from those of Warwickshire people in their own station of life. Therefore, since we are not to seek in the poet's parents for a direct clue to his genius, I will only give the reader a brief account of them prior to that year which saw the birth of William Shakespeare. So far back as the reign of Edward the Sixth there resided near Stratford-on-Avon a farmer named Richard Shakespeare. He had acquired gj^^j^^^I^^'^l^re considerable property in the village of Snitterfield, 2 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare which is distant about four miles from Stratford. Witli him, then, resided his two sons, Henry and John. About the year 1551 John Shakespeare left his father's home and settled down in the neighbouring Borough of Stratford-on-Avon. He took up his abode in Henley Street, one of the principal thoroughfares in Stratford, leading to the adjacent market town of Henley -in- Arden, from which it derived its name. For many years subsequently to 1551 John Shakespeare held a humble position as tradesman at Stratford, and it is not till 1556 that we find his worldly position advanced. In October of this year he purchased two small freeholds — one in Shakespeare. Hcnloy Street and the other in what was then known as Greenhill Street ; and he was summoned on a court of Record jury on the 21st of March, and in the proceedings of the Court of Record dated the 17tli of June he is described, in the Corporation books, as John Shakespeare of Stratford, ''glover." In the year 1557 he married Mary, the youngest daughter of Robert Arden, of Wilmcote (a village close to Stratford) who was a farmer of considerable wealth, and who had but lately died. And this Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare John Sliakospeare's Marria)'C- Robert Ardeu. marriage materially advanced John Shakespeare's worldly fortunes, for Mary Arden was a favourite child, and her father made over to her the reversion of a large portion of his estate, which comprised two farm houses, with a hundred acres of land, at Snitterlield, fifty acres at Wilmcote, and a copy- hold estate at the latter place of an unknown acreage. Robert Arden was a typical farmer of the period. He does not seem to have possessed any ambition to figure as a country gentleman — indeed, his only desire appears to have been to provide for his numerous family. And he possessed sufficient wealth to settle property on all his eight daughters, Agnes, Jane, Katherine, Margaret, Joyce, Alice, Elizabeth, and Mary. Nothing whatever is known of the personal character of Mary Arden, and therefore it would only be a matter of the merest sj^eculation if I were to depict her as a young woman entirely differing in mind and body from her sisters, or from other farmers' daughters of that period, or, on the other hand, to assert that, because she lived in the midst of rude surroundings, she was devoid of romance, or a feeling for the beautiful. Either of these statements would be idle conjecture. Mary Arden. SuiTouiidiiigs. 4 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Some idea of the domestic smTOundings of people of the Arden class can be obtained by a glance at the inventory of the goods of Robert Arden. Domestic Many of those articles of domestic use which our poorest folk now consider necessary were unheard of by that prosperous yeoman.* Table knives and forks, and what we now call crockery, did not exist. The food was eaten on flat pieces of wood, and for washing purposes the cleanly must have been put to sore straits, for they had not any soap, and the towels they did have were commonly used to wipe the hands after a meal. * The Ynventory of all the goodes, moveable and unmoveahle, of Rohart Ardennen, of Wyllmcote, late dessiside, made the ix.th day of December, in the thyrde and the forthe yeare of the raygne of our soverayne lorde and ladye, Phylipe and Mar ye, hinge and quen, due. 1556. Imprimis, in the halle, ij. table-bordes, iij. choyeres, ij. formes, one cobbowrde, ij. coshenes, iij. benches and one lytle table with shellves, prisede att viij.s. — Item, ij. peyntid-clothes in the hall and v. peyntid- clothes in the chamber, vij. peare of shettes, ii. cofferes, one which, priside at xviiij.s. — Item, v. borde-clothes, ij. toweles and one dyeper towelle, prisid att vj.*'. viij.d.- — Item, one fether-bedde, ij. mattereses, viij. canvases, one coverlett, iij. bosteres, one pelowe, iiij. peyntide-clothes, one whyche, prisid att xxvj.s. viij.(Z. — Item, in the kechen iiij. panes, iiij. pottes, iij. candell-stykes, one bason, one chafyng-dyche, ij. cathernes, ij. skellettes, one frying-pane, a gredyerene, and pott-hanginges with hookes, prisid att Ij.s. viij. fZ.— Item, one broche, a peare of cobbardes, one axe, a bill, iiij. nagares, ij. hatchettes, an ades, a mattoke, a yren crowe, one fatt, iiij. barrelles, iiij. pales, a quyrne, a knedyng-trogh, a lonng saw, a hansaw, prisid at XX. s. ij.fZ.— Item, "viij. oxen, ij. boUokes, vij. kyne, iiij. wayning caves, xxiiij./». — Item, iiij. horses, iij. coltes, prisid att viij.^j. — Item, l.ti shepe, prisid att vij./z. — Item, the whate in the barne and the barley, prisid att xviij.Zi. — Item, the heye and the pease, ottes and the strawe, prisid att iij.li. \].s. viij.fi. — Item, ix. swine, prisid att xxvj.s. viij.d. — Item, the bees and powltrye, prisid att v.«.— Item, carte and carte-geares, and plogh and plogh geares with harrowes, prisid att xl.«. — Item, tlie wodd in the yarde, and the baken in the roffe, prisid att xxx.s. — Item, the wheatein thefylde, prisid att vj-li. xiij.s. iiij.d.— Summa totalis, lxxvij./«. xj.s. x.d. JLanptot, --^•^ /&'•^•■ ^^ -^. ■ '. ■■'.<• '-r^ Nkhurst /Wf-L •ifiL^^T;.: •PARS. ~ den \Beu/trUvrtg K,DltiOrd.,-'' X LuMn^m/jf Loxl Map of a part of Warwickshire r.-^ /■.>, ^^^^hflty:Ailhdm^^ Wiithall fit. lL>xhall ■^^■^"^Jshnt^-^i^^'y n'apenhury \Strtncn:>:, Ra^fmlSemeley M IZ Jp£hyoolc~ ■-■■■-r^^^ ■■'■■ i I -m ^RWICK, Mortm MereU X Conrptoit -a^ Mgrdack showin cr the Shakespeare Country (1603). Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 5 These domestic deficiencies, however, could not suppress any inborn sensitiveness in Mary Arden's nature, or obliterate her emotional qualities, did she possess tliem, and, tlierefore, it is just as easy to conceive that this farmer's daughter had an innate refinement of thought and lofty aspira- tions — althougli living in an age when books were not obtainable, and intellectual education for women unheard of in those rural districts — as to imaffine her to be a mere buxom healthy country lass, with no other qualities than a knowledge of farm work and the general management of the dairy, the kitchen, and the store room. From the year of his marriage John Shakespeare rose in the estimation of his fellow-citizens. In 1557 he was elected one of the ale tasters of Stratford, and had the supervision of malt liquors and bread. He was, at the same time, made a burgess, and in 1558 — that is, the following year — he was appointed one of the four petty constables by the Jury of the Court Leet, who re-elected him in 1559. Among other civic ofiices he was, in 1561, elected one of the Chamberlains of the Borough. *^°^°4wity"''' All this time we find him living in Henley Street and following not only the business of a 6 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare glover, but other occupations. He dealt largely in wool and corn, and in 1556 he is found pursuing Henry Field for illegally detaining 18 quarters of barley. He was also a grazier, butcher, and tanner. Indeed, he seems to have combined in himself both the producer and the purveyor. At that time it was the custom among glovers in Stratford not to restrict themselves to a single business. In a MS. dated 1595, and to be seen in the Corporation Records, "George Perry e '" is thus described: — "Besides his glover's trade, use the buyinge and sellinge of woll and yorne, and making of malte." And, again, " Kobert Butler" is described as having Occupation. " bcsidcs his glovcr's occupation, use the makinge of nialtc ; " and there are many farmers of good repute at this day who carry on a similar combination of businesses, and who do not think it dci'ogatory to sell the wool from the sheep they rear, to tan the hide of the slaughtered animal, or to dispose of its carcass. The house in Henley Street in which John Shakespeare lived was one of considerable size and importance in Stratford, as it then existed. The present building, surrounded as it is by modern dwellings, cannot adequately convey any correct w PL, ,^3 pq Pact and Fiction about Shakespeare 7 idea of its significance in the year of William Shakespeare's birth. There is no contemporary evidence recording the precise day upon which William Shakespeare was born. The 23rd of April, which has been accepted since the middle of the last century as the Poet's birthday, is quite conjectural. The only evidence we have which enables us to arrive at an approximate idea of the day is the entry in the Stratford register recording his baptism, wiiiiamshrkespeare That event took place on Wednesday, the 26th of April, 1564. William was the third child of John and Mary Shakespeare, their two daughters, Joan and Mar- garet, being born in the years 1558 and 1562 respectively. Margaret died in 1563, and following William's birth in 1564 came Gilbert in 1566, Joan in 1569, Anne in 1571 (who died in 1579), Richard in 1573, and Edmund in 1580. In the July of 1564 — the year William Shake- speare was born — a plague broke out in Stratford. The sanitary arrangements of that Borough, in ArrangenSsia common with other country towns, were of the Stratford, most primitive kind; and John Shakespeare had, in 1552, been amerced in the sum of twelve pence 8 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare for a breach of such sanitary regulations as then existed. This plague fortunately did not attack any member of the Shakespeare family. As his responsibilities increased, the worldly condition of John Shakespeare showed a marked improvement. In 1565 he was elected an Alderman, and he helped to make up the accounts of the Chamberlains of the Borough, and this proves that he possessed some skill in arithmetic, whatever deficiency he showed in the art of writing. Neither John Shakespeare nor his wife could do more than make their mark, but this mode of attesting to one's signature was usual among the residents of Stratford. And, indeed, the art of writing was only practised by scriveners and by those who had received a scholastic education. Correct orthography was not thought to be, in this or the succeeding reign, of any importance. Elizabethan ^^ ^^^^ ^^^ samo sumamo spelt differently by Orthography, (jiffg^ent mcmbers of one family ; and even a scholar Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare. 9 like Sir Walter Raleigh sometimes spelt his name Rawley, and at other times Kalegli. There seems to have been no fixed rule in the matter. The name was spelt just as it sounded to the ear, and surely this is not more strange than the fantastic pronunciation still given to such family names as Beauchamp, Majoribanks, and Cholmondeley. Among Warwickshire people Shakespeare's name was spoken as if it were written Shaxper — indeed, by many of the rural population it is still so pronounced — and consequently it was often spelt as near to that sound as possible. On the fourth of September, 1568, John Shake- speare, or " Mr. " John Shakespeare, as we now for the first time find him designated in the Records, was chosen High Bailiff of Stratford, a post which he had been unsuccessfully nominated for in the previous year, and which was analogous to the ■.. .. ^^ nr mi l^ i John Shakospeare dignitary we now call Mayor, i lius we see that oir,t.-.i in the eleven years from the time John Shakespeare was elected to his first office — that of the supervision of malt liquors and bread in 1557 — he had risen to the highest official position his fellow-citizens could bestow uj^on him. And this brings me to a period in the career of John Shakespeare which I do not hesitate to lligli Itailiff. r>r;imntio lO Fact and Fie lion about Shakespeare suggest must liave indirectly moulded the youthful mind of his sou Williaui to tliat taste for theatrical representations which he afterwards developed to his and to our advantaere. I am referring to that passion for the drama which John Shakespeare most certainly showed while J^ailiff of Stratford. After his election dramatic entertainments were encouraged as they had never before been encouraged at Stratford. In the municipal accounts are entries showing that between 1568 and 1569 both the " Queen's Players" Entcrtaiiinu-nis and the 'VEarl of Worcester's Players" irave per- at Stratford. •' o i forniances in the Guild Hall before the Council. As these performances were free to the public, the Corporation bestowing on the players the necessary gratuity, it is not unlikely that members of the Corporation brought their children to see them, and the Bailiff, under whose patronage the representation was given, would scarcely hesitate to avail himself of a common privilege. From 1568 the taste for dramatic representations increased at Stratford, for I find that in 1573 the " Earl of Leicester's Players " appeared there, and in 1576 the "Karl of Warwick's" and the "Earl of Worcester's Players " gave performances. '' The Earl of Leicester's " and the " Earl of Worcester's " Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 1 1 companies paid a second visit in 1577, and in 1580 appeared the " Countess of Essex's I'layeis" and the " Elarl of Derby's Servants." These players must not be confounded with the meaner sort of actors, who, as Dekker words it, " travelled upon the hard hoof from village t(j village for cheese and buttermilk," without tlie protection of some nobleman to shield them from the charge of vagabondage. They were trained players of reputation. So from his fifth to his sixteenth year William Shakespeare had many opportunities of witnessing the best dramatic talent then before the public. For in the Earl of Leicester's company (among Leicester's^piayers. other Warwickshire players) was James Burbage — the father of that famous actor, Richard Burbage — who was the head of the comj^any, and acted before the Queen at Kenihvorth Castle in the summer of 1575. Perhaps it is in the lives of the Burbages that we are to look for the clue to the early stage career of William Shakespeare, and so it may not be quite out of place if I give here a few records of the Burbage family. A family of the name of Burbage was settled in Stratford-upon-Avon in tlie middle of the 12 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Tlio ]{urbage P^amily. William Shakespeare's Education. sixteenth century — a John Burbage was Bailiff of the Borough in June, 1555 — and James (tlie father of Richard and Cutlibert), although he had worked as a joiner, was, as far back as 1559 the head of ''Lord Robert Dudley's Company of Players," afterwards the " Earl of Leicester's Players," chiefly composed of Warwickshire men, who were the Court players, and held in the highest esteem. In this company were many educated men from the Universities, men who ranked as gentlemen, and who lived like noblemen, and in their wills were able to leave land, houses, money, and rich gifts of swords, rings, chains, and costly clothing to relatives, friends, and their fellow players ; and in 1573 John Heminge (afterwards to be William Shakespeare's friend and the Editor of his collected works) was probably of the company, for he, too, was a Stratford man, and, with Henry Condell, doubtless studied the Accidence and Lilly's Gram- mar in the same school as that attended in after years by young William Shakespeare. If the evidence I have obtained can be relied upon, it must be admitted that the early education of the boy Shakespeare was of a far higher kind than that generally conceded. Having previously acquired a rudimentary The Guild Chapel and Hall as they appeared in 1797. Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 13 knowledge of reading and writing, it was usual for boys to enter the Stratford Grammar School at the age of seven ; so it would be about the year 1571 when William Shakespeare ''with his satchel and shining morning face crept " (as boys do now) " unwillingly to school." A common blunder is that of stating that Shakespeare went to school in the Hall which is now used as the Grammar School. In 1571 the School was kept in the Chancel of the old Guild Chapel, which was originally part of a monastic establishment dissolved by Henry VIII., who confiscated its revenues. These were restored in 1553, by Edward VI. who, in his charter, described the School as " The King's New School." Another misconception is that of suppos- ing Shakespeare ever used a "horn book" at the Grammar School. This book was only used in the Parish School, which, compared with the Grammar School, was as an ordinary Board The Grammar school. School of to-day would be if compared with any of our great Public Schools. Shakespeare's Schoolmaster (whether Walter Roche or Thomas Hunt) would have been profoundly amused at the idea of his boys using the " horn book." Dr, Fuller, writing of Coventry Grammar School 14 Fact and Fiction about ShaJcespeare a few years after Shakespeare's death, sajs, ^' Herein I have seen more (abate the three English schools of the first magnitude — Eton, Westminster, Charter- house) and as well learned scholars as in any school in England." The salary of the Head Master of Stratford Grammar School was larger than that then received by the Head Master of Eton, and the appointment was in the hands of the Lord of Stratford Manor, one of the greatest and most learned men in the greatest and most learned court in Europe — that of Queen Elizabeth. He was no other than Ambrose, Earl of Warwick, the brother of Earl Dudley, owner of Kenilworth Castle. If William Shakespeare did not obtain con- siderable classical proficiency, the reason for that result must be looked for, not in the method adopted for his training, or the incompetence of his masters, but rather in the fact that the altered circumstances of John Shakespeare necessitated the Withdrawal from the youtli's withdi'awal from the school at an early Grammar School •' •' age to assist his father in his business. That he was withdrawn at an early age from the Grammar School was so commonly known to the inhabitants that when John Aubrey visited Stratford about forty years after Shakespeare's death, he was told Pact and Fiction about Shakespeare 15 by some of the poet's neighbours — who might well remember — that when Shakespeare was a boy 'Mie exercised his father's trade;"* and on Betterton, the actor, visiting Stratford, even forty years later, he was informed by the descendants of those who must have known the Sliakespeare family, that tlie dramatist's faiher " Bred him *Xotice of Shake'ipeare from Aubrey's Lives of Eminent Men. Mr. William Shakespear was borne at Stratford-upon-Avon in the County Warwick ; his father was a butcher, and I have been told lieretofore by some of the neiglibours that, when he was a boj-, he exercised Iiis father's trade, but wlien he kill'd a calfe, lie would doe it in a high style and make a speecli. There was at that time another butchers son in this towne, tliat was held not at all inferior to him for naturall a witt, his acquaintance and coetanean, but dyed young. This Wm., being inclined naturally to poetry and acting, came to London I guesse about 18, and was an actor at one of tlie plaj'-houses, and did act exceedingly well. Now B. Johnson was never a good actor, but an excellent instructor. He began early to make essayes at dramati(jue poetr)', which at that time was very lowe, and his plaj-es tooke well. He was a handsome well shap't man, very good company, and of a very readie and pleasant smooth witt. The humur of . . . ., the cunstable in a Midsomers Night's Ureame, he happened to take at Grenden in Bucks, whicii is the roade from London to Stratford, and there was living that constable about 1642, when I first came to Oxon. Mr. Jos. Howe is of the parish and knew him. Ben Johnson and he did gather humours of men dayly wherever they came. One time, as he was at the tavern at .Stratford-super-Avon, one Combes, an old rich usurer, was to be bnryed ; he makes there this extemporary epitaph, — "Ten in tiie hundred the devill allowes, = But Combes will have twelve he sweares and vowes ; = If any one askes who lies in this tombe, = Hoh! quoth the devill, tis my John o'Combe ! " — He was wont to goe to his native country once a yeare. I thinke I have been told that he left 2 or 300 /;'. per annnm there and thereabout to a sister. I have heard Sir Wm. Davenant and Mr. Thomas Shadwell, who is counted the best conuudian we have now, say tiiat he iiad a most prodigious witt, and did admire his naturall parts beyond all other dramaticall writers. He was wont to say tliat lie never blf)tted out a line in his life ; sa^'d Ben Johnson, — I wisli he had blotted out a thousand. His comfpdies will remaine witt as long as the English tongue is understood, for that he handles //loz-e.f /io//(//n(//i ; now our present writers reflect so much upon particular persons and coxcombeities, that twenty yeares hence they will not be understood. Thougli, as Ben Joluison says of him, that he had but little Latine and lesse Greek, he understood Latine pretty well, for he had been in his younger yeares a schoolmaster in the countrey. Training at the Grammar School. 16 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare for some time at a free school, but the narrow- ness of his circumstances and the want of his assistance at home forced him to withdraw the boy from the schooL" Of John Shakespeare's altered circumstances I shall speak hereafter. What I want to dwell upon now is the fact that the training at the Stratford Grammar School was of a fairly high order, and that Latin and Greek were both taught. As a preparation for deeper studies, the pupils were first instructed in ''Lilly's Grammar," the " Sententia Pueriles/' Deax's '' Manual of Phrases," and the ^' Confabulationes Pueriles." Among: the school books in common use at the School — and, indeed, in all the endowed Grammar Schools at that period, were '' Gate's Maxims," ^'^sop's Fables," the "Fables of Ph^drus" the ''Gesta Romanorum," the Histories of "Florus," '' Cfesar," and " Livy." Also, '' Tully," " Sallus," " Ovid," with the '' Eclogues of Baptista Mantuanus," "Virgil," "Horace," "Terence," "Seneca," the " Orations and Epistles of Cicero," and parts of "Juvenal" and " Plautus."* Many advanced * In the founder's statute of a Grammar School (Sir John Dean's) in 1553, the books used are enumerated thus — " The Accidence and Grammar set out b}' King Henry VIII. . . . and then Inditutum Chri-stiani that learned Erasmus wrote, and then copia of the same Erasmus, Colloquium Era^imi, Ovidii Aletamorplioae^, Terreuce, Tully, Horace, Sallus, Virgil, and such others as shall be thought most conveaieut." Fact and Fiction about ^hakesj^eare 17 pupils of the Stratford Grammar School had acquh'cd enough knowledge of Latin to correspond with some fiuencY in that language, and no doubt the " small Latin and less Greek " which, as Jonson afterwards asserted, Shakespeare possessed, would have been deepened and widened if he had remained longer at the Grammar School — unless, indeed, the boy followed that course which he afterwards described as a man — ' ' I am no breecliiug scholar in the schools ; I'll not be tied to hours, nor 'pointed times, But learn my lessons as I please myself."* But as the facts stand, Shakespeare's knowledge of Latin and Greek could not have been so incon- siderable, for there is a measure of praise in Ben Jonson's statement, and it must be borne in mind that Jonson (a pupil of Camden) spoke Lati'n^rnd" as a Classical scholar of the highest attainments, and what would seem " small Latin and less Greek " to him would appear a very considerable knowledge to a less learned and less critical authority. The days of John Shakespeare's declining pros- perity began about 1577, and in 1578 he is found effecting a mortgage on his Ashbies estate at Wilmcote. Later records show that dm-ing the * " Taming of the Shrew," Act III., Scene I. Greek." l8 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare next two years — 1579 and 1580 — he was in monetary difficulties. The father of our poet soon John hecame so deeply indebted to Edmund Lambeii, who d,eiA\\\\ng^\>Tol\)^r\ty. held tlio mortgage on the Ashbies estate, that not even the sale of his wife's reversionary interest in the Snitterfield property could clear off these and other debts. So about the age of thirteen, after having had six years' tuition at the Stratford Grammar School, William Shakespeare finished his scholastic education and settled down to that form of life which his father had designed for liim. As previously stated, the business of John Shakespeare (like that of his friend, Ralj:)!! Cawdrey, who had twice been bailiff of Stratford) was a combination of farmer, glover, woolstapler, butcher, and purveyor of farm produce ; and I see in this occupation nothing incompatible with the study of natural history and poetic forms of expression. Much of young William Shakespeare's life would be spent on his uncle's farm at Snitterfield, or his father's meadows near Stratford, where he became acquainted with the wealth of flowers and the many varied forms of j)lant, insect, and bird life, the knowledge of which was to become so useful to him in after days. Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 19 Without some employment of this kind it would have been scarcely possible for him to have described rm*al scenery and mode of life with the com|)leteness he did. Every allusion to it in his plays (and later I shall more directly refer to this) points to his having lived, moved, and had his being as a lad in the atmosphere of the meadow and the fann. Youthful cx.cu,,atiou. And even if he had, in his youth, followed the trade of a butcher, as tradition asserts, and " killed a calf in high style," as recorded by Aubrey, I shall be able to show later that some of his happiest similes and allusions were drawn from a storelK)use of practical kncjwledge, such as even a reflective and imaginative butcher might have acquired, and fixed on the tablet of his memory ^vitli those " saws of books," "forms," and " jiressures past, that youth and observation copied there." And even at this time Shakes2:)eare would not be altogether ignorant of the fame that had l)een acquired by the Ipsmch butcher's son, Wolsey, and his defence of him in later years seems to have been inspired by intense sympathy and kindred feeling. There is something almost personal in those lines of Griffith beginning — " This Cardinal, Though from an humble stock, undoubtedly Wolsey's rise. 20 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Was fashioned to much honour from his cradle. He was a scholar, and a ripe, and good one : Exceeding wise, fair spoken, and persuading ; Lofty and sour to them that loved him not. But to those men that sought him, sweet as Summer."--' During the next five years of William Shake- speare's life we have no record of him. We know that several companies of players visited Stratford during that period, and it is not unlikely that William, now verging on to manhood, attended the performances. The Rev. John Ward, vicar of Stratford, who might well have known Shakes^^eare's grand-daughter, Lady Barnard, has left it recorded in his diary that Shakespeare " frequented the plays all his younger time ; " and gossiping Aubrey, a few years later, asserts that William, " being inclined Early naturally to poetry and acting . . . began early to make essayes at dramatic poetry." Be that as it may, of one thing we are assured, that about this time he was occupied with an affair of the heart. Those who are acquainted with Stratford must remember that pleasant walk through the meadows to Shottery. When the fields are spread with " Daffodils, That come before the swallow dares, and take The winds of March with beauty," * Henry VIII., Act IV., Scene II. Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 21 when every bank gives shelter to " Bright primroses in happy council grouped, Their faces turned unto their nearest Wn The slender cowslips, as if to welcome them," the way to Shottery is delightful. But in Spring, or Summer, or Autumn, tlie grassy walks are equally enchanting to those who love sylvan scenery. In Shakespeare's youth the walk must have been even more solitary and romantic than it is to-day. And it was here (according to tradition) tliat WilHam Shakespeare came to woo Anne Hathaway. One cannot l)c certain that the wooing was all on his side, for Anne was eight years older than Shakespeare, and at the age of twenty-six women arc not altogether insensible to the charm of a youthful lover, wliose form is shapely and whose expressions are gentle. Anne Hathaway was the daughter of one Ricliard Hathaway, a substantial yeoman, of Shottery. Tlie Hathaway family was of considerable repute in the neighbourhood of Stratford, and possessed land in various parts of Warwickshire. So little trustworthy evidence, however, is obtain- able relative to her ancestors, that any detailed account is impossible. The earliest notice of Anne The wooing of Anne Hathaway. The Hathaways. 22 Fact and Fiction ahoiit Shakespeare HatliaAvay's birthplace was not made till 1750, when the Rev. Joseph Greene, then master of the Stratford Grammar School, compiled Nicholas Rowe's un- published account of the locality, which assigned her birthj^lace to Luddington, where, as Rowe recorded it, "a substantial family of that name still reside." This was in Greene's amended statement Avritten down Shotteriche, " where a creditable family of the shottery. name aforementioned till within these few years resided." It appears to have been the custom in Shake- speare's day, before a license for marriage could Ijo obtained, for a bond to be entered into by two responsible sureties at the Consistory Court. Shakespeare's sureties were Fulk Sandells and John Richardson, inhabitants of Shottery, the village in which the Hathaway family are said to have resided.* * The Bond given in November, 1582, in anticipation of the marriafje of Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway. Noverint imiversi per presentes nos, Fulconem Sandells de Stratford in coniitatu Warwicensi, agrieolam, et .Johannein Rychardson, ibiden^. agricolam, teneri et firmiter obligari Ricardo Cosin, generoso, et Roberto Warmstry, notario publico, in quadraginta libris bone et legalis unonete Anglie solvendis eisdeni Ricardo et Roberto, heredibus, exeeutoribiis vel assignatis suis, ad quam quidem solucionem bene et fideliter faciendain obligamus nos et utrumque nostrum, per se pro toto et in solidum, heredes, executores et administratores nostros, firmiter per presentes sigillis nostris sigillatas. Datum 28 die Novembris, anno regui domine nostre Elizabethe, Dei gratia Anglie, Francie et Hibernie regine, fidei defeusoris, etc., 25''. — The condicion of this obligacion ys suche that, if herafter there shall not appere any lawfull lett or impediment, by reason of any precontract, consanguitie, affinitie, or by any other lawfull meaiies whatsoever, but that Pact and Fiction about Shakespeare 23 The date of this bond (given in anticii)ation of the marriage) is the 28th of November, 1582, when Shakespeare was only eigliteen years of age. And unless a precontract of marriage were entered into before this period (a course sometimes taken in those Bond of Marriage, times by young and ardent lovers, and almost as binding as marriage) it is open to supposition that the union of William Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway was hastened by circumstances and dictated by motives of honour. The maiTiage, in accordance with general practice, would be celebrated a few days after the execution of the bond— at the beginning of December. Now a reference to the facsimile of the Stratford register at the end of this volume will show that the first child, Susanna, was baptized on Sunday, May the ^^^^^ ^^ susanna. 26th, of the following year. That the marriage was William Shagspere one thone partie, and Anne Hathwey, of Stratford, in the dioces of Worcester, maiden, may lawfully solennize matrimony together, and in the same afterwardes reniaine and continew like man ivnd wiffe, according unto the lawes in that behalf provided ; and, moreover, if there be not at this present time any action, sute, quarrell, or demaund moved or depending before any judge, ecclesiasticall or temporall, for and concerning any suche lawfuU lett or impediment ; and, moreover, if the said William Shagepere do not proceed to solemnizacion of mariadg with the said Anne Hathwey without the consent of hir frindes ; and, also, if the said William do, upon his owne proper costes and expenses, defend and save harndes tiie right reverend Pather in God, Lord John Bushop of Worcester, and ids offycers, for licencing them, the said M^illiam and Anne, to be maried together with once asking of the bannes of matrimony betwene thejn, and for all other causes wliicii may ensue by reason or occasion therof, that then the said obligacion to be voyd and of none effect, or els to stand and abide in full force and vertue. 24 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare not one of lasting" affection is tolerably clear, for about three years after his union with Anne Hathaway, and shortly after the baptism of his twin children, Hamnet and Judith, the poet left Strat- ford, and took that important step in his life which ultimately gave to England her greatest dramatist. ^H'^vnA^ b^ Whether the departure of William Shakespeare from his native town was hastened by the rancom* of Sir Thomas Lucy, of Charlecote Hall, who, in Deer 'poaching 1585, had the cliargc of a bill in Parliament " for the preservation of grain and game," and who might incident. w Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 25 have rigorously pursued Shakesj^eare for his youthful frolic of deer poaching, is at least open to doubt. This species of poaching ^Yas not confined to men of Shakespeare's class. The same form of depredation was practised by the students of the Universities, and Dr. Forman relates how two students in 1573 — one of them, John Thomborough, aged 21, afterwards Bishop of Worcester — "never studied, nor gave themselves to their books, but to go to schools of defence, to the dancing schools, to steal deer and conies" — which goes far to prove that poaching deer was not then considered to be a very heinous crime.* That Shakesj^eare had received some affront from Sir T'homas Lucy is clearly shown by his satirical ^''^lucv"'^^ references to him in the character of Justice Shallow in the "Merry Wives of Windsor;" but that he composed the doggerel verses first publislied by * Contemporary evidence proves that the gravity of tlic offence was lessened when tlie youthful offenders were of good social position, and from the following extract it would seem that to poach deer for sport was considered to be a " ril)baud in tlie cap of youth," and not a rcpreliensible crime. " Some colts, wild youngsters, that ne'er broken were, Hold it a doughty deed to steal a deare ; If cleanly they come off, tliey feast anon, And say their pray is good fat venison ; If otherwise I)}' t!iem it doth ajjpeare Tluit that whicli they liave stoUen then is deare." " Wits Bedlam," 1G17. Shakespeare and ■ Thoi Lucy. 26 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Steevens in 1778 from Olclys' MS., and commencing- " A Parliament Member, a Justice of Peace, At home a poor Scarecrow, in London an Ass," and affixed them to the gates of Charlecote Park, is not worthy of credence. Whetlier it was this poaching business or the poverty of his father, or the fact that he had tired of matrimonial Hfe, which necessitated liis departure from the borough, the evidence is perfectly clear that he left Stratford about this period. 'J'here is yet another circumstance which may have conduced to his hasty dej^arture from his native town. This was the re-appearance in Stratford of the company of i^layers under the Burbages. They had been acting at the Hall of the Guild, and Shakespeare, who must have been on terms of intimacy with those members of the company who were his ^^stiatford°"^ townsmen and who had often experienced his father's hosj^itality and patronage when Bailiff of Stratford, may have taken this opportunity of em- bracing a 2^rofession which he loved, and for which after events proved him to be so eminently fitted. It must always be remembered that Shakespeare commenced liis theatrical career as an actor, and it was not till he had made some progress in the art of Fact and Fiction about Shak€S2icarc 27 acting that we hear of him as a dramatist. Nothing is accurately kno^\Ti of Sliakesi)care's movements from 1587 till 1592, but there is evidence that within this period Burbage and his company were travelling on the Continent, playing before Kings, Grand Dukes, Princes, and burgomasters, and that they sojourned for some time in Denmark, where they saw in the flesh two gentlemen of that court, named Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. The signatures of these gentlemen, wi'itten side by side, are preserved in an autograph album which belonged in 1577 to Duke Frederick the First of Wurtem- bm'g, and which is still treasured in the Royal Public Library at Stuttgart. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were tlien in attendance upon their royal master, Frederick the Second, who, before and after 1587, distinguished himself by entertain- ing the Earl of Leicester's players under Richard companyfbroad. Burbage. If Shakespeare were a member of Burbage' s company of players when they sought for reputation abroad, it would very natm^ally account for nmch of his acquaintance with the customs of foreign com'ts ; and the fact that both Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were members of the Danish Com*t at the period of Burbage' s visit goes far to 28 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare show that Shakes^^eare was aware of the circumstance when, later, he wrote his play of ''Hamlet." Much that is conjectural has been written about Shakespeare's first employment on the stage. If we consider the terms of intimacy that must have existed between James Burbage and his patron, John Shakespeare, and that later we find William Shakespeare associated in the management of play- ''^'ou the stage?"*" liouscs witli Eicliard and Cuthbert Burbage, it is hardly credible that the youthful poet held or tended horses for his daily bread when he left Stratford and settled in London. Other young men, with far less natural ability than Shakespeare must have possessed, and without the advantage of influential actor-friends, have left their homes and joined theatrical companies. There are several players of repute in London who began in this way. In every case the procedure was exactly the same. They were admitted as members of the company either as supernumeraries or as "general utility," to play small parts, and in some cases to "hold the book," or, using a less technical phrase, " to prompt." Sometimes a clever lad will commence his stage career as a " call boy," and by promotion reach the Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 29 post of ''j^^omptci'," and at last the coveted position of actor. That this procedure is of very ancient date there is ample proof, for Downes, the prompter, writing in 1710, observes, '' I have knoAvn men A\dthin my remembrance arnve to the highest dignities of the theatre who made their entrance in the qualities of mutes, joint-stools, flower pots, and tapestry Downes's record, hangings," and it is more than probable that he had heard from men who had acted under Sir William Davenant, and who knew the facts as related by the poet's godson, that Shakespeare's first appear- ance upon the stage was in some such subordinate capacity. But in whatever capacity Shakespeare first appeared upon the stage his dramatic instinct and the constant practice in the round of parts he would be compelled to enact would soon show to exj)ert actors that he was far above the average tyro in ability. Indeed, we have e\T[dence that he had made in 1592 some position both as a player and as a play- wi'ight. The e\ddence that I am about to adduce is well known, but its importance in tracing the career of the great di*amatic poet cannot be over-rated. On 30 Fact and Fiction about Shahes2oeare Robert Green's attack. the 3rd of September, 1592, died Robert Greene, who had, for the nine years immediately preceding his death, been a wi-iter for the stage. He seems "Greene in Conceipte." Title page of a pamphlet, " Greene in Conceipte." to have fallen into disrej^ute as a dramatist, and just before he died he gave vent to his dis- appointment in a little work entitled "Greene's Groat's- worth of Wit, bought with a Million of Repentaunce . . . written before his death, and published at his dying request." He first entreats Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 31 Christopher Marlowe, '' the famous gi-acer of tragedians," to turn from his atlicistical ways, and use his wit for the glorification of the Giver of all. " Defer not, with me, till this last point of extremitie; for little knowest thou how in the end thou shalt be ^dsited."* And Marlowe's death, some two years later, was tragical enough. Then he goes on: "Base-minded men al three of j^ou" (Marlowe, Nash, Peele) "if by my miserie ye be not warned; for unto none of you, like me, sought those buiTes to cleave ; those puppits, I meane, that speake from our mouths, those anticks, garnisht in our colours. . . . Yes, trust them not ; for there is an * " Greenes Groats-trorth of Wit, bouyht with a .Million of Repentaunce. Describing the foUie of youth, the falshoode of make-ahift flatterers, the iniaerie of the negligent, and mischiefe-s of deceining Courtezans. Wintten before his death and jynhlishtd at his dying request. — Fielice.m fuisse. infausfnni. — London, — Printed by Thomas Creede, for Richard Oliue, direlliiig in. long Lane." Originally jmtili'ihed in 1592. The writer's address — " To those Gentlemen, his Quondam acquaintance, that spend their wits in making Plaies, R. G. wisheth a better exercise, and wisdome to preuent hia extremities." If wofull expeiieuce may iiioove you gentlemen, to beware, or unheard of wretclieilnes intreate you to take heed, I doubt not but 3'ou will looke backe with sorrow on your time past, and endevour \\itli repentance to spend that wliich is to come. Wonder not, for with thee wil I first begin, thou famous gracer of trageo Uallauts. spitting, wagging their upright cars, and cry Filthy ! Filthy ! simply uttering their own con- dition and using their wryed countenances, instead of a vice to turn the good aspects of all that shall sit near them from what they behold." Strangely enough, a similar charge was brought against Ben Jonson himself by Dekker in 1602. In his '' Satiromastix " he says of Jonson " that he sat in the gallery during the performance of his plays, distorting his countenance at every line, to make the gentlemen have an eye of him, and to make players afraid to take his part " — that is afraid to act the part assigned to them. The other charge is in these terms: — " Besides you must foreswear to venture on the stage when your play is ended, *^tiH> 1'^". " and to exchange courtesies and compliments with the gallants in the lords rooms, to make all the house rise up in arms, and to cry ' that's Horace ! that's he ! that's he ! that's ho that pens and purges humours.' " Ben Jonson, in his '' Devil is an Ass," played in 1616, touches upon the demeanour of 54 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Conduct of those who sit on the Stage. Card playing, nut cracking, and smoking at the Play. the young men who used to sit upon the stage and display their fine suits there. Fitzdottrell tells his wife — " Here is a cloak, cost fifty pounds, wife, Which I can sell for tliirty, when I have seen All London in it, and London has seen me. To-day I go to the Black friar's playhouse. Sit in the view, salute all my acquaintance : Eise up between the acts, let fall my cloak, Publish a handsome man, and a rich suit : And that's a special end why we go thither. All that pretend to stand for't on the stage : The ladies ask, who's that '? for they do come To see us love, as we do to see them." The visitors used to amuse themselves with reading, playing at cards, drinking, and smoking during the performance. Dekker. in his "Gulls Horn Book," 1619, tells his hero, whom he supposes to be sitting on the stage, " before the play begins fall to cards," and Stephen Gosson, in his "School of Abuse," 1579, informs us that young men of his day treated the ladies to apples. Nut-cracking was also a favourite amuse- ment of the lower class of spectators — "the vulgar sort of nutcrackers who come for sight," as Ben Jonson calls them. Sir John Davies and Christopher Marlowe in their epigrams, printed about 1598, speak of smoking as a "danger," and Fact and Fiction ahout Shakespeare 55 Ben Jonson in '' Bartholemcw Fair" (1614) talks of those " who accommodate gentlemen with tobacco at our theatres." It was a common practice (as noted by Jonson, Webster, Beamiiont, and Fletcher in their works) for auditors as the play progressed to take down jests and passages in their tablets or " table books," as they were called, and often maimed and corrupted copies of plays were then printed and sold, to the manifest injury of the author and the acting right of the players. Heywood, deploring this custom, says in his " Pleasant Duologues and Dramas " how plays are copied by the ear, observing " That some by stenography drew The plot, put it in print, scarce one word true." Unautliorised priutmg of Plays. He further says in the prefatory matter to his ''English Traveller" (1633): ''True it is that my plays are not exposed unto the world in volumes to bear the titles of works, as others ; one reason is that many of them, by shifting and change of companies, have been negligently lost ; others of them are still retained in the hands of some actors, who think it against their peculiar profit to have them come to print." Marston, in his preface to the " Malcontent," 1604, says: "one thing only affects me; to think 56 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Plays common Property. Venus and Adonis. that scenes, invented merely to be spoken, should be inforcively published to be read." So strongly was this species of theft felt to be injurious, and so impossible was it to invoke the law for the protection of that which was not then considered to be a property, that Henslowe, in his diary, records the fact that he '' lent unto Robert Shaw, the 18tli of March, 1599, to give unto the printer to stay the printing of ' Patient Grissel ' 40 shillings." There are many other interesting facts relating to the stage at this period, but I fear that I have already deviated too far from the " direct forth- right " of my theme. I shall, however, later, touch upon the emolument of author and actor, and other points of theatrical interest, as they better exemplify the life of our poet and his companions. After Chettle's tribute to Shakespeare in his "Kind Hart's Dreame" in 1592, we find the dramatist making a bid for fame in work un- connected with the stage. I refer to his poem of "Venus and Adonis," published by his friend, Richard Field (the son of the Stratford tanner, Henry Field) in 1593, and dedicated to the Earl of Southampton. Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 57 As this dedication is the first iindramatic prose composition of the poet known to exist, a study of it may not be miinteresting : — " Right Honom-able, I know not liow I shall offend in dedicating my unpolisht lines to yom- Lordship, nor how the worlde will censure mee for choosing so strong a proppe to support so weake a burthen, onelye if your Honour seeme but pleased, I account myself e highly Dedicatiun to thu praised, and vowe to take advantage of all idle Southampton. lioures, till I have honoured you with some graver labour. But if the first heire of my invention prove deformed, I shall be sorie it had so noble a god- father : and never after eare so barren a land, for feare it yeeld me still so bad a harvest. I leave it to your Honoui-able sm'vey, and your Honor to yom- hearts content; which I wish may alwaies answere your owne msli, and the worlds hopefull expectation. Your Honors in all dutie, William Shakespeare." It wdll be observed that one phrase in the dedication has a special importance, for Shakespeare definitively states therein that the poem of " Venus and Adonis " is the first heii- of his invention. If The first hiir of his luveutiou. that were so the poem must have been composed between the years 1587 and 1592, before he became kno\\ai as a waiter for the stage; and 58 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare judging from internal evidence there is notliing to preclude the possibility of this. The descrip- tions of the chase are gTaj)hic and picturesque, such as one might reasonably expect from a poet who had lived all his younger days in the comitry, and had thus acquired a special knowledge of hounds and horses. The following description of the good 23oints of a horse in the fiftieth verse has never been surpassed : — " Eound-hoof'd, short-jointed, fetlocks shag aud loug, Broad breast, full eye, small head, and nostril wide, High crest, short ears, straiglit legs and passing strong, Thin mane, thick tail, broad buttock, tender hide : " This is equal in completeness to the jDoet's later description in " The Taming of the Shrew" of the defective qualities of a horse, which runs as follows : — " Possessed with the glanders, and like to mose in the chine; troubled with the lampass, infected with the fashions, full of wind-galls, sped with spavins, rayed with the yellows, past cure of the fives, starlc spoiled with the staggers, begnawn with bots ; swayed in the back, and shoulder shotten."* The only possible motive for doubting Shake- Poe:i). speare's statement that this poem was the first heir of his invention is the fact that the verses show such a complete mastery of rhythm and choice of * Taming of the Shrew, Act III., Scene 2. Evidence in the Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare ;j9 diction, and yet even this is satisfactorily explained by the statements made by Aubrey and others tliat he " began early" to make essays in poetry. It may ]>e, however, that Shakespeare places the -^^^ utorary value poem on a different plane of literary value to that "^ ^'"' ^'"'""*" of his plays, and from this standpoint intends to suggest that it was the first heir of his invention. Indeed, it is clearly showTi that he did set a higher value upon his poems than upon his dramatic efforts. We have no such references about the lasting worth of his dramas, as those wiitten ])y the poet of his verse. In the fifty-fifth of his Sonnets he ^^a'ites — "Not marble, nor the gilded monuments Of princes, shall outlive this powerful rhyme ; " and in the eighty-first Sonnet he T;vTites — ' ' Your monument shall be my gentle verse, AVhich eyes not yet created, shall o'er-read ; And tongues to be, your being shall rehearse When all the breathers of this world ai-e dead ; You still shall live (such virtue hath my pen) Where breath most breathes— even in the mouths of men." Now, even allowing for poetic hyperbole, this is a very high (and a very sound) appreciation of the work. We find tliat Shakespeare, when dealing with his l)lays, in comnum with other dramatists vaiuoof riays. of the time, sets a purely commercial value on his 60 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare labours. Plays were not then accepted as serious contril^utions to literature, and when Ben Jonson published his collected plays as "works" in 1616, he was derided for doing so by Fitzgeoffry in " Certain Elegies." But whether "Venus and Adonis" was, or was not, the first heir of Shakespeare's invention, the dedication of it to the Earl of Southampton won for the poet the patronage and friendship of one of the most powerful, most romantic, and most scholarly noblemen of the age. The friendship of some great noble was necessary in those days to protect and encourage poets, players, and playwrights. The uncertainty of regular emolument made it an absolute necessity for a scholar or a poet to enrol himself under the banner of some great lord. And men like the Earls of Essex and Southamj)ton did noble work in befriending such poets as Edmund Spenser and Shakespeare. Queen Elizabeth, although an ardent admirer of theatrical representations, did not generously support its exponents; she was, as Camden describes her, "liberal in commendations" only. So to the young noblemen of the Court, poets, playwrights, and players turned for Friendship of tho Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 61 bounty, and in voiy few cases did tlicy appeal in vain. The friendship of the Earl of Southampton for the young dramatic poet, Shakespeare, ripened apace, and in May, 1594, Shakespeare dedicated a souuipton. second poem to that nobleman, viz., the poem on the subject of " Lucrece." 'I he follo^ving are the terms of this second dedication, and they contrast in a marked manner with the diffident tone of the dedication affixed to "Venus and Adonis" a year before: — " The love I dedicate to your Lordship is without end : wherof this Pamphlet, ^vithout beginning, is but a superfluous Moity. The warrant I have of your Honourable disposition, not the worth of my untutored Lines makes it assured of acceptance. What I have done is yours, what I have to doe is yours, being part in all I have, devoted yours. Were my worth greater, my duety would shew greater, meane time, as it is, it is bound to your Lordshi}) ; To wliom I aWsIi long life still lengthned with all happinesse. Your Lordships in all duety. William Shakespeare." Of the munificence of the Earl of Southampton to Shakespeare we have the folloAving traditional evidence. Nicholas Rowe, in 1709, wrote '' There is one VENVS AND ADONIS Vilia mireturqmlgus .• mihiflauui (^^oUo ^ociila Cdflaliapkm mimjlretaqua. LONDON Imprinted by Richard Field ^ and are to be fold at thefigne of the white Greyhound in Paules Church-yard, 15^3- TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE Henrie VVriothelleyjEarle of Southamptorij and Baron of Titchfield. \IghtHof2ourdle, Iknow not how I shall offend in d£dicatmg my unpolisht lines toyonrLorashipjnor hoTp thevforlde 'vvill cenfuremee for choojingjo Prong aproppe to fuppcrt fo 'vveake a burthen^ onelye if your Honour feeme hut pleafed ^ I ac- count myfelfe highly praifed, and ^owe to take aduantage of all idle hcures^tilllhaue honouredyou with feme grauer labour. But if the fir H heire of my inuentionproue deformcd^I fhall be forie it hadfo noble agod father : d72d?ieuer after ear e f) barren alatid^ for f ear e ityeeldmeftillfo bad a haruefty 1 leaue it to jour Honou • rableftiruey^ndjour Honor to your hearts content ^njvhich I trip:) ?nay ahvaies anfwereyour owne^vvifh^ and the ccn enacted as far back as 1593. " Henry V." in 1599. "Much Ado About Nothing" and "As You Like It" in 1600. "Hamlet," "The Merry Wives of Windsor," and "Twelfth Night," in 1602. "Measure for Measure" and "Othello" in 160^. "Lear" in 1606. "Antony and Cleopatra" and "Pericles" in 1608. " Troilus and Cressida" in 1609. "Coriolanus" in 1610. "Macbeth," "Cymbeline," "The Winter's 'J'ale," and " The Tempest " in 1611 ; and " Julius Cgesar " in 1613. I can find no definite record of the date of production of the remaining three of Shake- speare's plays— "All's Well that Ends Well," "Henry VIII.," and Timon of Athens "—but there is not the least doubt that they were written before 1613, in which year Shakespeare retired to Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare. 67 PLEASANT Conceited Comedie CALLED, Loues labors loft. Asit was prefentcd before her I Lghncs this M Chriflmas. Newly corrc£led and augmented B) W. Shakepre. Imprinted at London by W.W<, for Cutbcrt Burljy^ 68 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Stratford to live, as I shall show, upon the wealth he had acquired. In speaking of the success of Shakespeare as a dramatist, it ought not to be forgotten that some measure of that success was due to the interpreta- tion of his principal characters. Indeed, to Richard Burbage the poet was under great obligations, greater than those who are not intimately acquainted with the nmtual ol)ligation Pi^y^r and Play- of plajcr and playwright can well understand. Even Shakespeare's finest creations can be rendered tame and abortive by inadequate representation, and Burbage Ijrought the force of his genius to bear on Shylock, Richard III., Romeo, Henry V., Brutus, Hamlet, Othello, Lear, Macbeth, Pericles, and Coriolanus. As an actor Burbage seems to have been unequalled, and contemporary criticism is all in praise of his dramatic power. From many eulogies written before and after his death I cull the following : — " What a wide world was in that little space. Thyself a world — the Globe thy fittest place ! Thy stature small, but every thought and mood, Might throughly from thy face be understood. And his whole action, he could change with ease, Richard Burbage. From ancient Lear, to youthful Pericles. But let me not forget, one choicest part j Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 69 Wlxerein beyondtlie rest, lie moved the heart. The grieved Moor, made jealous by a slave, Who sent his wife to fill a timeless grave. Then slew himself upon the bloody bod : All these, and many more, are with him, dead. Hereafter must our poets cease to write : Since thou art gone, dear Dick, a tragic night Will wrap our black hung stage : he made a poet, And those who yet remain full well may know it." That significant remark "He made a poet" shows clearly enough the estimation he was held in as a Shakespearean actor ; and after his death, in March, 1618, Shakespeare's heroes were never so finely played till Betterton appeared. There were some twenty-six other actors associated with Bm'bage in the representation of Shakespeare's plays, among them being John Heminge, William Kempe, Thomas Pope, Henry Condell, Actors in shake- William Sly, John Lowin, and Joseph Taylor, '«i^--^"« pi-y«- not a few of whom were Warwickshire men.* Of the parts the poet acted in his own plays no reliable accounts can be obtained. The tradition recorded by Oldys, that Shakespeare played Adam * The names of the PrincipaU Actors in Shakespeare's playes, as set forth in the frst Folio. — William Shakespeare; Richard Burbadge ; John Henimiiigs ; Augustine Pliillips ; William Kempt ; Thomas Toopo ; George Bryan ; Henry Condell ; William Slye ; Richard Cowly ; dohn Lowine ; Samuell Crosse ; Alexander Cooke ; Samuel (iilburne ; Rol)ert Armin ; William Ostler ; Natlian Field ; John Underwood ; Nicholas Tooley ; William Ecclestone ; Joseph Taylor ; Robert Beufield ; Robert Goughe ; Richard Robinson ; John Shancke ; John Rice. to Fad and Fiction about Shakespeare in " As You Like It," is quite untrustworthy, and Nicholas Rowe's statement that " the top of his performance was the Ghost in his own ' Ham- let ' " is, to say the least of it, purely conjectural, unsupported as it is by the smallest contemporary evidence. Still, if we cannot associate Shakespeare Shakespeare as an . i r^ • i •!• Actor. with acting definite characters m his own works, we have evidence of his having played in the works of other authors. In 1608, a license was granted by James the First to Shakespeare and the members of liis company to perform at the Globe playhouse, and in the country.* Records of this tour have been found at Bath, Coventry, and other provincial towns, and it was during the term of this license that Shakespeare acted at the * Licence to Shakespeare, and othem, to play comedies, "">'i-i>- even when takivig into account the fact that the order was not implicitly obeyed. 76 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare M CO ^ ^ pq s'^. .5 <^ bo a rt rrt p .o C^. fH J^act and Fiction about Shakespeare 77 § 2 I ^ S ^ i I ^ 5 g^ -d -^ « g Ti ^ ^ ■T3 ^ C O cj u 4) > o a '73 -t) 3 2 n 5 -=! a S '^ '^ 4^ " -^ TJ "3 * ►^ o :: o ?* ^ -i^ 3 > bo 'g a •- o — a 3 .^ o £8 <1> M 3 2 3 ^ •S^-«aJr-rt^OtnS'^''T3 -^ >=3'^33^'^2ik3?i'5^ 9 f-ir3':3to_^^r2ff>C"WS."SS ;3 sSc2^«,'a|i^^S'g 2o«« * O^-^ £i^ S--- o,y >> 03 o « W ^ 5 ^ 2 CO -d Ji! ::3 The Poet's " share. 78 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare I am unable to discover what was the exact projiortion of Shakespeare's share in the Globe and Blackfriar's playhouses, but it must have been a considerable one. It was the custom at that time for theatrical business to be carried on by those immediately connected with the stage. There were no financial supporters of the drama who speculated in its profit and loss. The actors themselves were divided into two classes — the "sharers" and the "hirelings." The "sharers," as the term suggests, obtained their remuneration from a portion of the profits of the performance. Shakespeare indicates in "Hamlet" (Act III., Scene 2) that a whole share was a considerable interest in a "cry of players;" and in a petition presented to the Lord Chamberlain, some years after Shakespeare's death, by the Burbages, we get a further insight into the emolument of actors. Says this document: " The players that lived in the first times had onely the profitts from the doores, but now the players receave all the commings in Sharers and ^^ ^^^ dorcs to tliemselvcs, and half e the galleries hirehngs. f^^^^^^ ^|^g housekecpers." ^rhe "hirelings" were engaged at a weekly salary, and their services were often secured for a term of years, by such an agreement as Henslowe drew up with Dawes, the Fact and Fiction about ShaJcespearc 70 plaj^er before mentioned. Tlie salary of a '' lure- lino-" of course varied with his ability, but I find that six shillings a week (just double the averan^e wage of a day labourer) was considered fair emolu- ment for an intelligent player in those days. I have read of an actor's being engaged for a year at five "^'^"""""'^ ri:iy<'i-5=. shillings a week. This was the amount paid to boj^s who always enacted the juvenile and female parts, and who were invariably apprenticed to an established actor for a term of years. Although as early as 1592 women acted in foreign theatres, the prejudice against the innovation was so strong in the British mind that it was not until the Restoration that they appeared upon the English stage. But long after the Restoration trained men actors were preferred in female parts to women Womonontho who were comparative novices in the art of acting. The dramatic author in the reigns of Elizabeth and James was remunerated at a very moderate rate. Before the year 1600 the price paid by Henslowe for a new play never exceeded £8. In August, 1 598, he had given Ben Jonson, Henry Porter, and Henry Chettle £6 only in full payment for a play called " Hot Anger Soon Cold." Sometimes a successful author was paid in advance, to secure his services. But playwrights did not earn large Stage. 80 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare sums of money by their plays in Shakespeare's The euiolumeiit of ,• "ot j.ii"r\ ip tt ^^ Playwrights. time, iien Jonson told Drmnmond or Hawthorn- den that " of all his plays he never gained £200." Shakespeare's ^Aay^ were held in the highest estimation, as I shall presently show, but before doing so I must briefly record the death of the poet's son, Hamnet, which took place early in August, 1596, when the boy was in his twelfth son, Hamnet, and " ycar, tlic dcatli of tlic poct's fatlicr in 1601, and of liis father and . . , . -, rtr\o mother. his mothcr m IbOo. I should dwell upon these facts if I could discover that their occurrence had any effect upon Sliakespeare's mode of life and writings. But there is nothing to prove that he ever paid more than the visit " into Warwickshire once a year," recorded by Aubrey, till he finally settled in Stratford in 1613. From the death of his parents Shakespeare did not derive the smallest financial benefit ; indeed, during the latter years of his life, John Shakespeare had declined in prosperity. As far back as 1578 he was obliged to provide two sureties to obtain the loan of £5 ; and in 1586, about a year after our poet left Stratford, we find the following in the proceedings ° "porerty^^'^^^ against John Shakespeare in tlie Court of Record, after a distress had been issued for the seizure of Pact and Fiction about Shakesj)care 81 Ills goods : — •" John Shakespeare has no effects on which a distraint can be levied." In October, ') fa.^vii^ ^^ Facsimile of the Signature of Susanna Hall. 1596, however, he had sufficiently recovered from his embarrassments to apply to the College of 82 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Arms for a grant of coat armour ;* but this only- coat announ'^ points to the fact that, from this period, until his death five years afterwards, the old glover received assistance from his successful son, there bein"-, after 1596, no further record of his indigence. Shakespeare's wife and family had always been permanently located at Stratford ; and there is no Shakespeare's family. . . , , . . , . existing record, or even traditional evidence, to show that they ever left tlie borough and came to reside at the poet's reputed London dwelling, near the Bear Garden in Southwark. Marriage of Susanna. ^^ 1607 was Celebrated tlio marriage of Shake- speare's eldest daughter, Susanna, witli John Hall, * Draft of a Grant of Coat-Armour propoiei to be conferred on Hhakfipaart^ s Father. From the original manuscript preserved at the College of A rmx. To all and siiiguller noble and gentelmen of all estates and dcj^'rees bearing arms to whom these presents shall com, William Detliick, Uarter, Prineipall King of Arms of England, and William (Jampden, alias Clarentieulx, King of Arms, for the sowth, east and weste partes of this realme, sendetho greetinges. Knowe j'ee that in all nations and kingdoms the record and remembrances of the valeantfactes antl vertcous dispositions of worthie men have ben made knowen and divulged by certeyne shieldes of arms and tokens of chevalrie, the grant and testimonie wherof appertej-nethe unto us b}' vertu of our offices from the Quenes most exc. majeste, and her highenes most noble and victorious progenitors ; wherefore being solicitetl, and by ci'edible report informed, that Jolin Shakespere, nowe on Stratford-uppon-Avon in the counte of Warwik, gent., whose parent, great grandfatlier, and late antecessor, for his faithefull and approved service to the late must prudent jjrinre King H. 7. of famous memorie, was advaunced and rewarded with landes and tenementes geventohim in those partes of Warw ikeshere, where they have continewed bie .some descentes in good repulacion and itredit ; and for that the said Jolni Shakespere having maryed the daughter and one of the heyrs of Robert Arden of W^ellingcote in the said countie, and also produced thishiv auncient cote of arms heretofore assigned to him whilest lie was her Majesties Officer and baylefe of that towue, In cousideratiou of the premisses, and for the en- Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 83 Master of Arts, and a physician of some repute ; later I shall have to record the marriage of her sister, Judith, with Thomas Quiney. This latter event, however, did not take place till 161 G, a few weeks before Shakespeare's death. And now I will turn to the recorded opinions of Shakespeare's contemporaries, and by quoting a few of them sliow how highly his work was held Ct)ntuini)<.rary , . -r» 1 /-i 11 p if-ii 1 upiniun (if Sliake- ni then' esteem. Ixobert (jrreene s abuse of Shake- spt-arcs work. speare in 1592 was followed by laudatory notices in 1594 and 1595, in which his poem of " Tarquin and Lucrece" is specially singled out for com- couragemeiit of his posterite, unto whom suche blazon of arms and atcheiKmenfes of inheritanct from theyre said mother by the auncyout custome and lawes of arms maye lawfullie descend, We, the said (iartcr and Clarentieulx, have assigned, graunted and confirmed, aiul, hy these jtrexentes exemp/efied, unto the said Jolin Sliakcspere and to liis posterite, that shiehl and cote of arms, viz., in a field of gould uppon a bend sables a speare of the first the poynt upward hedded argent ; and for his creast or cognizance a falcon with his w^aiges displayed standing on a wretlie of his coullers supporting a speare armed hedded and steeled or sylver, fyxed uppon a helmet with mantelles and tasselles, as more playnely maye appeare depicted on this margent ; and we have lykeirise vpjion on other eacucheone impaled the same with tlie auncyent arms of the said Arden of Wellingcote, signefeing thereby it maye and, shal be lawefuU for the said John Shakespere, gent., to beare and use the same shitldes of arms, single or impaled as aforesaid, during his naturall lyfl'e ; and that it shal be lawfull for Ills cliildren, yssiie, and posteritie, lawfully begotten, to beare, use, and quarter and shetce forthe the same with theyre dewe ditTerences in all lawfull warlyke factes and eevele use or exercises, according to the lawes of arms and custome that to gent, belongethe, without let or interruption of any person or persons for use or per bearing tlie same. In wyttnesse and testeinonye wherof we have subscribed our names and fastened the scales of our ofiices. Yeven at tiie Office of Arms, London, the... day of... in the xlij.te. yeare of the reigne of our most gratious soveraigne Elizabeth, by the Grace of God, Queue of Ingland, France and Ireland, Defender of the Fay the, &c., 1599. 84 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare mendation. Francis Mercs, " Master of Arts of both Universities," in his " Palladis Tamia," published in 1598, has a lengthy eulogy of Shakespeare's writings^ from which the following is an extract: — "As the soul of Euphorbus was thought to live in Pythagoras, so the sweet witty soul of Ovid lives in mellifluous and honey tongued Shakespeare ; witness his ' Venus and Adonis,' his ' Lucrece,' his sugared Sonnets among his private friends, &c." This was the first time that Shakespeare's sonnets had been mentioned by a contemporary (they were not published by Thomas Thorpe till 1609), and whatever motive the poet may have had for writing them — and much has been, and might still be, conjectured on this point — they undoubtedly were highly valued in his day as poetic compositions. Meres continues : Francis Meres, ct^g Plautus and Scucca are accounted the best for comedy and tragedy among the Latins, so Shakespeare among the English is the most excellent in both kinds for the stage ; for comedy witness his ' Gentlemen of Verona,' his ' Errors,' his 'Love's Labour's Lost,' his 'Love's Labour's Won,' his ' Midsummer's Nights Dream,' and his ' Merchant of Venice ; ' for tragedy, his ' Kichard n.,' ' Richard lU.,' ' Henry IV.,' 'King Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 85 John,' ' Titus Andronicii?,' and his ' Romeo and Juliet.' As Epius Stolo said that the Muses woukl speak with Plautus' tongue if they would speak Latin ; so I say that the Muses would speak with Shakespeare's fine filed phrase, if they would speak English." In 1599 were written some commendatory verses on Shakespeare by John Weever. He is again mentioned in " Belvedere, or the Garden of the Muses," 1600. In Camden's " Remains," 1605, camden's, Shakespeare figures as a "most pregnant wit "R-mains.' whom succeeding ages may justly admire," with Sir Philip Sidney, Spenser, Chapman, Marston, and Ben Jonson. In the " Return from Parnassus," printed in 1606, as before stated, occurs the following duologue between the players Burbage and Kempe. Kempe remarks: "Few of the University pen plays well : they smell too nuich Tho retun.jrom of that writer Ovid, and that writer Metamorphosis, and talk too much of Proserpina and Jupiter. Why, here's our fellow Shakespeare puts them all down, aye, and Ben Jonson too. that Ben Jonson is a pestilent fellow! He brought up Horace giving the poets a pill, but our fellow Shakespeare hath given him a purge that made him bewray his credit." Burbage replies: "It's a shrewd fellow indeed." 86 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Barksted. John Da vies. Freeman. Ben J(jn.son's testimony. In 1607 William Barksted eulogized Shake- speare in his " Mirrha, the Mother of Adonis." In John Davies's satirical epigrams 1610 the poet is thus addressed : "To our Elnglish Terence, Mr. Will Shakespeare." Webster, in the dedication to his tragedy of Paulo Giordano Ursini, 1612, sj^eaks of the ' ' right happy and copious industry " of Shakespeare ; and in the ej^igrams by Thomas Freeman, 1614, Shakespeare is again eulogized in an enthusiastic sonnet. To Ben Jon son's memorable poem on Shakespeare I shall refer hereafter, but I wish to confine these testimonials of appreciation to writings published during the dramatist's lifetime. Of the man and his manner we have the recorded opinions of those who were on terms of daily intimacy with him. Such was Ben Jonson, who wrote as follows: "I remember, the players have often mentioned it as an honour to Shakespeare that, in his writing, whatsoever he penn'd he never blotted out line. My answer hath been, would he had blotted a thousand, which they thought a malevolent speech. I had not told posterity this, but for their ignorance who choose that circumstance to commend their friend by wherein he most faulted ; and to justify mine own candour — for I lov'd the man, and do Portrait of Ben Jonson. Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 87 honour his memory, on this side idolatry, as much as any. He was, indeed, honest and of an open and free nature ; had an excellent phantasy ; brave notions and gentle expressions ; wherein he flowed with that facility that sometime it was necessary he should be stoj^p'd; sufflaminandas erat^ as Augustus said of Haterius. His wit was in his own power — would the rule of it had been so too ! Many times he fell into those things, could not escape laughter, as when he said in the person of Caesar, one speaking to him : ' Caesar thou dost me wrong ; ' he replied, ' Caesar did never wrong but with just cause;'* and such like; which were ridiculous. But he redeemed his vices with his virtues. There was ever more in him to be praised than to be pardoned, "f * The line Jonson alludes to, now reads as follows : — " Know Cfesar dotli not wrong ; nor without cause Will he be satisfied." Julius Ciesar, Act III., Scene 1. t Nicholas Rowe, in his Life of Shakespeare, records the tradition tiiat the poet's " acquaintance with Ben Jonson began with a remarkable piece of humanity and good nature : Mr. Jonson, who was at that time alto- gether unknown to the World, liad ofl'ered one of his plays to tiie players, in order to have it acted ; and tiie persons into whose hands it was put, after iiaving turned it carelessly and superciliously over, were just upon returning it to him with an ill-natured answer, that it would be of no service to tlieir company ; when Shakspeare luckily cast liis e^'c upon it, and found something so well in it as to engage hiin first to read it througii, and afterwards to reconniiend Mi-. Jonson and his writings to the public." Shakespeare's acquaintance with Ben Jonson may have begun in tlie manner narrated by Rowe, but Jonson at the time of the traditional meeting (1598) " was not altogether unknown to the World." Before tiie 88 Fact and FicUon about Shakespeare In some of tliose merry meetings at the Mermaid, Ben Jonson had doubtless suffered from the shafts of Shakespeare's keen wit, and the more scholarly- poet had not forgotten it when he penned the latter portion of the above. There is quite a touch of personal feeling in the line — " that sometime it was necessary he should be stopp'd." I should venture to say Jonson tliought that form of procedure very FuIIm's account, oftcu ncccssary if Dr. Fuller's account of these meetings can be relied upon. Says the Doctor — " Many were tlie wit combats betwixt him and Ben Jonson, which two I behold like a Spanish great galleon and an English Man of War. Master Jonson, like the former, was built far higher in learning, solid, but slow in his per- formances. Shakespeare, with the English man of war, lesser in bulk, but lighter in saiHng, could turn with all tides, tack about, and take advantage of all winds, by the quickness of his wit and invention."* That Shakespeare, Jonson, and their fellow production of " Every Man in His Humour " (the play that Shakespeare is supposed to have "cast his e3'e upon," and recommended to his fellow players) Jonson liad been employed by Philip Henslowe at the Rose Theatre, and it was only after iiis duel with Gabriel, that he seceded from tlie company. * Dr. Fuller has an interesting piece of information in his " Worthies " about JonsoUj and another of Shakespeare's intimates. He writes : "I Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 89 playwrights lived in perfect amity and concord there is every proof. After Greene's attack no petty jealousy was shown of Shakes] jeare's success and genius. When a poet did write about him it was to praise not to condenni. In the contemporary records, or tliose written immediately after his death, I do not find any reports which disparaged his genius. It did not seem to be the custom then to "soothe the envy of conscious mediocrity " by abusing a great man. Such statements as were made by John Manningham in his diary, and by Aubrey and others, of Shakespeare's reputed gallantries, even if true, were not calculated to injure him as a man or a poet. And these accounts are wanting in all corroborative evidence. Looking at tlie records of the Davenant incident as I may, I see nothing but conjecture in tlie repeated statements that the vintner's wife ever formed an attachment for Shakespeare, or he for her. Doubtless, Shakespeare in his journeys to and from Stratford frequented the Crown Tavern remember when I was a scholar at Trinity College, Oxon, 1G46, I heard Ralph Batluust (now Dean of Wcllsl saj' tliat Ben Jonson was a Warwick- shire man." And writing of the poet Micliacl Drayton, the Doctor says " He was a butclier's son, born at Athcrston upon Stower in Warwick- shire." This statement is curious, if only to point tlic coincidence tliat it was in company with Ben Jonson and Drayton that Sliakespeare had his last merry meeting at Stratford a sliort time before lie died. Ci intern |Kirary fi'i-lin^,' towartis 81iake.siH.'are. The Davenant incident. Manningham's story 90 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare at Oxford, kept by John Davenant; and he may liave admired the hostess, and, as a compliment, stood godfatlier to her boy William ; but it was to an anecdote published by John Taylor, " The Water Poet," in 1630, of a different person, that the following well-known story owed its origin : — " One day an old Townsman ol)serving the boy Davenant running homeward almost out of breath, asked him whither he was posting in that heat and hurry ?" He answered, " to see his godfather, Shakespeare." " There's a good boy," said the other, '' but have a care you don't take God's name in vain." Sir William Davenant's own tacit acceptance of the stigma of illegitimacy in after years can be reasonably explained. He was conscious that to be considered Shakespeare's natural son was an honour any man might covet. Manningham's story of our author has the merit of being contemporaneous, published as it was in 1602, besides which it has certain points of humour and plausibility. Briefly it is this : — Acting one afternoon in ''Richard III.," Burbage was overheard by Shakespeare to make an appoint- ment with a gentlewoman. After the play he was to go to her chamber, knock at the door, and, being interrogated, was to reply "'TisI, Richard III.," Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 91 upon which he would be admitted. Shakespeare, not being detained till the end of the piece, thought that he would keep the appointment, and doing so was shortly afterwards followed by Burbage. Upon being asked who it was that knocked, Burbage answered '"Tis I, Richard III." and uj3on hearing this Shakespeare replied, " Go thy ways, Burby, for thou knowcst that William the Conqueror reigned before Richard III." I had intended to have omitted these traditional records of intrigue, but the incidents are so familiar to students of Shakespeare that it would seem as if I wished to depict the poet as a paragon of all the virtues had I ventured to suppress them. Having briefly shown in what estimation Shake- sjDcare was held while he lived, I will now turn to his more immediate affairs, and relate how those sums of money which he derived from his share in the profits of the playhouse and the performance siiakosjiean's of his plays were invested. A year after John Shakespeare had applied to the College of Arms for the grant of coat armour — that is in the Spring of 1597 — we find Shakespeare making his first considerable investment. This was the purchase for sixty pounds of the mansion at Stratford called "New Place," which was, as investments. 92 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare New Place. Richard Quiney. far back as 1496, known as "the Great House," and which was destined to be Shakespeare's home wlien he returned to Stratford.* In January, 1598, Shakespeare seems to have contemplated acquiring some land in the neighbourhood of Shottery, for one Sturley, writing to his brother-in-law, Richard Quiney, says, "it seemeth . . . that our country- man, Mr. Shakespeare, is willing to disburse some money upon some odd yardland, or other, at Shottery, or near about us ; " but whether he completed any j^urchase of land there I cannot ascertain. In 1598 the reputed wealth of Shake- speare was such as to induce the aforesaid fellow townsman of the poet, Richard Quiney, to solicit a loan of thirty pounds — a considerable sum in those times, when the possession of forty pounds caused a man to be regarded as rich. This letter from Quiney to Shakespeare (the only letter to him known to exist) is preserved at the Shakespeare Museum at Stratford. In 1602 Shakesj^eare purchased one hundred and seven acres of land near Stratford from William and John Combe for * Leland visiting Stratford about the year 1540 describes the Chapel and New Place as follows : — " there is a right goodly chappell, in a fayre street towardes the south ende of the towne, dedicated to the Trinitye ; this chappell was newly re-edified by one Hugh Clopton, major of London ; this Hugh Clopton builded also' by the north syde of this chappell a praty house of bi'icke and tvmbre." Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 93 the sum of three hundred and twenty pounds. This purchase was negotiated by his brotlier, Gilbert, who followed the trade of a haberdasher. Later, in the same year, Walter Getley surrendered rurthor purciiasoa. to Shakespeare certain premises in Chapel Lane, Stratford, including a cottage and a garden. In 1605 Shakespeare purchased the " moiety of a lease of the tithes of Stratford -on- A von, Old Stratford, Welcombe, and ]3ishopton." For this he gave the large sum of four hundred and forty pounds. In 1610 the poet bought from William and John Combe twenty acres of pasture land. In 1613 he purchased from Henry Walker a house and yard at Blackfriars, near to the theatre, for one hundred and forty pounds. In this year his brother Richard died — F'dmund, the actor, having j^^.^^,^^ ^^^ Ricii.ird been buried at St. Saviour's, Southwark, as far Shakl^lxlarc! back as 1607. 94 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 4-" u 'J ^ n^ ^ ^l V^ 44 ^ P3 c3 (!J Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 95 r— - O ^ ei ._^ r- o ■^ 2 o 5« P2 ^ ^ «i M 3 0) - so _ 'w o '2 O 2 r^ -= iS p > a ^ ?5 ^ s =3 — -= js o >; ;= o ^ S 2 =^ a *> .c :=! Ti t; C 2 M cs •-■ ss - c 2 J3 33 < >i ^ 1— 1 ^- >> >i =! S *^ > 2 -5 :3 ^ a> ;= ^ -5 -2 2 ^ o ^ 5 w S3 ^ ^ 2 !S 5e 3 -3 ei ^ C a} o 5 a t- o to *j _c 5: B i3 M >» u ? a a o O ^1-1 ^ "^ o H a o s c3 O o o j3 o .5 'S s c4 0} ft _G >> 4-i > 3 00 o « H-( M O /*, c -2 P3 o =- ^ K-l O (N :3 a' p5 -§ -S S 96 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare With Shakespeare's financial success came certain concomitant anno^^ances in the shape of litigation. Here his business training stood him in good stead, for in 1604 we find, by the Stratford Records, that Litigation. he successfully pursued one Philip Rogers for the value of some malt, and in 1608, one John Addenbrooke for the recovery of a debt. Sliake- speare had now accumulated a considerable landed estate. He possessed more than one hundred and twenty-seven acres of land about Stratford ; a mansion, cottage, and garden in the borough of Stratford, and an estate in Blackfriars. At Stratford his name was entered in all the leases and deeds as "William Shakespeare, in the County of Warwick, gentleman," — and it is not a matter for surprise that in 1613, having secured a competence, we find him leaving theatrical management, with its cares and anxieties, for the well-earned repose of a country life. It seems to have been Shakespeare's ambition Return to Stratford, f I'om early tiincs to rctum to Stratford and settle down there as a country gentleman. And the success of his iuA^estments in the playhouses and the popularity of his plays, combined with his thrift and prudence, enabled him to do this sooner than could reasonably have been anticipated. The Fact and Fiction nhout Shahcapcarc 97 poet may have had all his later days thoughts of such a life as he depicted in his early play of "Henry VI ," and as he looked on his possessions at Stratford, might well have said with that Kentish gentleman, Alexander Iden, " Lord, who would live turmoiled in the Court, And may enjoy such quiet walks as these ? This small inheritance Contenteth me, and 's worth a monarchy. I seek not to wax great by others' waning ; Or gather wealth, I care not with what envy ; Siifficeth, that I have maintains my state, And sends the poor, well pleased from my gate."* Be that as it may, in 1618 (the year which saw the destruction by fire of the Globe playhouse) Shakespeare took up his residence at " New Place/' Stratford. With the one exception of 1614, in which year the newly-built Globe was opened, I find no record of Shakespeare ever re-visiting the scene of his dramatic triumphs. He seems to have been contented to remain in Stratford, surrounded by the members of his family, and occasionally seeing William and John Combe, his Welcombe Lif. at stratfoni. ncighjjom^s — (the latter of whom, at his death in 1614, left the poet five pounds). f At other times * Henry VI. (Second Tart), Act IV., Scene 10. t Tliis legacy conclusively proves that Jolin Combe hail kin.lly fceling3 towards the poet, and if Shakespeare were indeed the author of the doggerel epitaph imputed to iiim by Aubrey— given at lengtli in the 98 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare The Globe Theatre, after rebuilding, in 1614. he would entertain at Stratford certain of his London companions — players and playwrights. "Notice of Shakespeare from Aubi-ey's Lives of Eminent Men" on page 1.5— it must have been written after Combe's death in 1614. Rowe's statement that the lines were written dining the lifetime of John Combe, and " that the sharpness of the satire is said to have stung the man so severely that he never forgave it " is, in the face of the legacy, obviously erroneous. Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 99 On February lOtli, 1616, Shakespeare gave liis daughter, Judith, in marriage to Tliomas Quiiiey, the son of that Richard Quiney wlio had appHed to him for a loan. In the previous January <:t{lrnA. ^^>^§h" -^^ytoiXU^ f^'Jo^^ Baptism of his Daughter. Susanna, 26th May, 1583. Baptism of his Twin Children, Hamnet & Judith, 2n(l February, 1535 Burial of his Son, Hamnet, lUh August, 1596 Burial of his Father, 8th September, IGOl. Marriage of Susanna to Dr, Hall, 5th June, 1607. Marriage of Judith to Thomas Quincy, 10th February, 161G. Burial of Shakespeare, 25th April, 1616. 104 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Burial. The Uharnel House. recorded by the Rev. John Ward, died, after a short ilhiess, on April the 23rd, IGlG.f On April the 25th William Shakespeare was buried in Stratford Church at the age of 52. Over his grave laid a slab bearing the following well- known inscription : — " Good frend for lesvs sake forbeare, To digg the dvst encloased Leare ; Blese be ye man yt, spares thes stones, And cvrst be he yt moves my bones." Whether this doggerel was selected by the poet to restrain the "meaner sort" of sextons from disturbing his remains must always be an open At that period, however, it was the Stratford to transfer the bones from the adjacent Charnel House; and question, custom at graves to Shakespeare may have had sentimental objections to his "sconce" being knocked about by some t Extract from an original memoranda-hook of the Rev. John Ward, Vicar of Stratford-on- Avon. — " This bool-e was bej/itnne Feb. 14, 1661, and finished Ajiril the 25, 1663, at Mr. Brooks his house in Stratford-rippon- Avon." Shakspear had but two daughters, one whereof Mr. Hall, the physitian, married, and by her had one daughter, to wit, the Lady Bernard of Abbington.— I have heard that Mr. Shakespeare was a natural wit, without any art at all ; hee frequented the plays all his younger time, but in his elder days livd at Stratford, and supplied the stage with two plays every year, and for that had an allowance so large that hee spent att the rate of a tliousand a yeer, as I have heard. — Shakespear, Urayton, and Ben Jhonson, had a merry meeting, and, itt seems, drank too hard, for Shake- spear died of a feavour there contracted. — Remendier to peruse Shake- spears plays and bee versed in them, that I may not bee ignorant in that matter. " Shakespeare's Bust in Stratford Church as it now appears. Fact and Fiction ahoiit Shakespeare 105 knave with ^'a dirty sliovcl," and liis Ijoncs used for a game of " loggats," .such as he describes in '' Hamlet,"* and sucli as lie had, as a youth, prohahh- seen played A\dtli the bones stored in Stratford Charnel House. That all interest in the great dramatist did not cease at his death is shown by the testimonies of his relatives, friends, and admirers. Within seven years of his death, a bust sculptured by Gerard Johnson, and, doubtless, typical of the poet as he appeared during the latter years of his life, was erected in the Stratford church by the members of The Stratford Bust. his family. As this bust has been painted three times — in 1748, in 1793, and in 1861, and othermse desecrated by well-meaning enthusiasts, very little reliance can now be placed upon the work as a presentment of the jDoet as he lived. Upon a tablet placed below the bust are engraven the following appreciative lines — *' JVDICIO PYLIY>t, GENIO SoCRATEM, ARTE !MaROXEM Terra tegit, Popvlvs AL'eret, Olympvs IIabet." ' ' Stay Passenger why goest thov by so fast ? Read, if thov canst, whom enviovs Death hath plast, With in this monvment, Sliakspeare : with whonio, Qvick Natvre dide : whose name doth deck ys Tombo, Far more then cost ; Sieh all, yt. Ho hath writt, Loaves living art, bvt page, to servo his witt." * JIamlet, Act V., Scene \, y. ii o i: < C t3 e o < P C3 < s o a W H >• f- /: r- > a o Q < 7' c a E ^ a b. c H c U "= H - < W 6 c^ o o c % H H K c t ^ s ft. o e .J .J • t~ 5 I S i r 55 3 □ c= H u & c 2 g » Kfe« W H n E i < c ; 1 g hi B c < S a H 2 1 -£ 5 c: 6 •X s S P ^ c ; ~ - ^ = = 1 t= ^ ^ - t. <; 3 < c K c «■ c Q O s V o u s- < z ■< > W a H C < c o Q < c • e • = 5 5 -I i H^s iiiii s S« - s = \^ n H H s X k ►^ « J > 2 2 &i: i^ S § " S E l| S^S O s = 3 S 0" C Cn ^ 5 u 3 s H § o -< ; Is 2 §S B f- H ?. "« b: C c «B|-o^ o « c j^ •< > > u • >• o « •< .J > o , — ■ -^ is o (3 iM i ?' J s * 1 ! 1 s^ s 2 n o < Ed Q o 1 E 11 e o a c~' V T' — s ° 2 ^ T! ^ K Cs, c: a -li* .s E" fc t- Xi i5 ? = / 5 fr- H P^ OQ EULOGISTIC VERSES BY SHAKESPEARE'S CONTEMPORARIES. On William Shakespeare, who died in April, 1616. Renowned Spenser, lie a thouglit more nigh To learned Chaucer ; and rare Beaumont, lie A litle nearer S[)eiiser, to make room For Shakespeare, in your three-fold, four-fold tomb. To lodyc all four in one bed make a shift Until d'iomsday ; for luudly will a lift Betwixt this day and that by fate be slain, For whom your curtains may be drawn again. But if precedency in death doth bar A fourth place in your sacred sepulciire, Under this carved marble of thine own, Sleep, rare tragedian, Shakespeare, sleep alone. Thy unmolested peace, unshared cave. Possess, as lord, not tenant, of thy grave ; That unto us and others it may be Honour hereafter to be laid by thee. — William Basse. To the Memori/ of my Beloved the Author, Mr William Shakespeare, and ivhat he hath left ns. To draw no envy, Shakespeare, on thy name. Am I thus ample to thy book, and fame ; While I confess thy writings to be such. As neither man, nor muse, can praise too much ; 'Tis_true, and all men's suffrage: but these wa3-s Were not the paths I meant unto thy praise : For seeliest ignorance on these may light, Which, when it sounds at best, but echoes right ; Or blind affection, which doth ne'er advance The truth, but gropes, and urgeth all by chance ; Or crafty malice might pretend this praise, And think to ruin, where it seem'd to raise : These are, as some infamous bawd, or whore. Should praise a matron ; what could hurt her more ? But thou art proof against them ; and, indeed, Above the ill fortune of them, or the need : I, therefore, will begin : — Soul of the age ! The applause, delight, the wonder of our stage ! My Shakespeare, rise ; I will not lodge thee by Chaucer, or Spenser ; or bid Beaumont lie A litth? further, to make thee a room : Thou art a monument without a tomb ; And art alive still, while thj- book doth live. And we have wits to read, and praise to give. That I not mix thee so, my brain excuses ; I m3an with great but disproportion'!! muses: For, if I thought my judgment were of years, I should commit thee surely with thj' peers : And tell — how far thou didst our L^'ly outshine. Or spoi'ting Kyd, or Marlowe's mighty line. And though thou hadst small Latin, and less Greek, From thence to honour thee, I woulil not seek For names ; but call forth thun'dring /Eschylus, Euripides, and Sophocles, to us, I'acuvius, Accius, him of Cordova dead, To life again, to hear thy buskin tread And shake a stage ; or, when thj- socks were on, Leave thee? alone ; for the comparison Of all that insolent (ireece, or haughty Home, Sent forth, or since did from their ashes come. Triumph, my Britain ! thou hast one to show, To whom all scenes of Europe homage owe. He was not of an age, but for all time ! And all the muses still were in their prime, When like Apollo he came forth to wnrm Our ears, or like a Mercury to charm ! Nature herself was proud of his designs, And joy'd to wear the dressing of his lines ! \\'hich were so richly spun, and woven so fit, As, since, she will Vouchsafe no other wit: The merry Greek, tart Aristophanes, Neat Terence, witty I'lautus, now not please ; But antiquated and deserted li<., As they were not of Nature's family. Yet must 1 not givtf Nature all ; thy art, My gentle Shakespeare, nuist enjoy a part :— For though the poet's matter nature be. His art doth give the fashion : and that he. Who casts to write a living line, must sweat, (Such as thine are) and strike the second heat Upon the muse's anvil ; turn the same, (And himself with it) that he thinks to frame ; Or, for the laurel, he may gain a scorn,— For a good poet's made, as well as born : And such wert thou. Look, how the father's face Lives in his issue ; even so the race Of Shakespeare's mind, and manners, brightly sliines In his well-turned and true-filed lines : In each of which he seems to shake a lance, As brandish'd at the eyes of ignorance. Sweet swan of Avon, wliat a sight it were. To see thei' in our waters yet appear ; And make those fliehts upon tlie banks of Thames, That so did take Eliza, and our James ! But stay ; 1 see thee in the hemisphere Advanc'd, and made a constellation there : — Shine forth, thou star of poets ; and with rage, Or influence, chide, or cheer, the drooping stage : Which, since thy flight from hence, hath mourn'd like And despairs day, but for thy volumes light ! [niyiit, Bex Jonson. To the Metnori/ of the deceased Author, Master William Shakespeare. SiiAKESPF.\RE, at lengtli thy ]iious fellows give The world thy works ; thy works, by which outlive Thy tomb, thy name must : when that stone is rent. And time dissolves thy Stratford monument, Here we alive shall view thee still. This book, \\'hen brass and marble fade, shall make thee look Fresh to all ages : when postm-ity Shall loath what's new, think all is prodigy That is not Shakespeare's ; every line, each verse, Here shall revive, redeem thee from thv herse. Nor fire, nor cank'ring age, — as Xaso said Of his, — thy wit-fraught book shall once invade : Nor shall 1 e'er believe or think thee dead. Though miss'd, until our bankrout stage be sjjed (Impossible) with some new strain to out-do Passions "of Juliet, and her Homeo ; " Or till I hear a scene more nobly take, Than when thy half-sword parly ing Romans spake : Till these, till any of thy volume's rest. Shall with more fire, more feeling be express'd, Bo sure, our Shakespeare, thou canst never die, But, crown'd with laurel, live eternally. — L.- Diooes. 106 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare Then wc have eulogistic verses wi'itten after his death by William Basse, Hugh Holland, Leonard Digges, Ben Jonson, and later, by John Milton. One portion of Ben Jonson' s oft-quoted testimony I wish to dwell upon, as it exemplifies many points jonsoii's testin.ony in the poot's laboui' wliich otherwise bear a uf iuiiniratioi). -,.r„ • t dinerent construction. Jonson Avrites — " He was not of an age, but for all time ; And all the muses still were in their prime, When, like Apollo, he came forth to warm Our ears, or like a Mercury to charm. Nature herself was proud of his designs, And joyed to wear the dressing of his lines ; Which were so richly spun, and woven so fit, As, since, she will vouchsafe no other wit : The merry Greek, tart Aristophanes, Neat Terence, witty Plautus, now not please ; Shakespe ire's art. j^^j. antiquated, and deserted lie, As they were not of Nature's family ; Yet must I not give Nature all: thy art My gentle Shakespeare, must enjoy a part; For though the poet's matter nature be, His art doth give the fashion : and that he Who casts to write a living line, must sweat, (Such as thine are) and strike the second heat Upon the muses anvil ; turn the same, (And himself with it) that he thinks to frame ; Or for the laurel, he may gain a scorn, For a good poet's made, as well as born : A^d such wert thou." Here is a direct contradiction to the statements Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 107 that Shakes^Deare ''wanted art." Jonson is emphatic when he says — " Yet must I not give Nature all : thy art My gentle Shakespeare, must enjoy a part ; " and again the lines — " For a good poet's made, as well as born : And such wert thou " — show that Jonson, a practical craftsman, was well aware of the labour Shakespeare had emi)loycd to The evidence of perfect his skill as a poet and a plaj^vright. And it is only on the testimony of those who wrote in later times that we learn he never laboured to improve himself in his art. In matters of stagecraft — whether in the contrasts of character, the selection of dialogue, or the development of his plot, Shake- speare's skill stuck "fiery off indeed" when compared vaiXi that of his contemporaries. Kvery line of his plays is wntten from a practical actor- pla}^vi'ight's point of \dew — the view of obtaining an effect — and, taking into consideration the conditions under which plays were produced in Shakespeare's day, the effects he did obtain were marvellous. And this superiority over them in tlie essentials of his art is duly and honourably testific>d to by his brother dramatists. Of Milton's Ode I quote the following : — ' ' What needs my Shakespeare for his honoured bones 108 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare The labour of an age in piled stones ? Or that his hallowed reliques should be hid, Milton's eulogy. Under a star-y pointing pyramid ? Dear son of memory, great heir of fame, What needs't thou such weak witness of thy name ? Thou, in our wonder, and astonishment, Hast built thyself a livelong monument." But the greatest and most lasting memorial to the fame of Shakespeare was contributed by his two fellow-players and partners, Jolni Heminge and Henry Condell. When these two men "with- out ambition either of self e-profit or fame ; onely to keepe the memory of so worthy a friend and fellow alive, as was Shakespeare," gave to the world the first folio edition of his collected works they erected The first Folio. ^ " Time defying monument" to the poet.* Before the first folio was published, not more than one half of Shakespeare's plays had been printed, and several of his masterpieces, including ''The Tempest," "Macbeth," "Twelfth Night," * The dedication of the players prefixed to the first Folio 1623 To the Most Xoh/e and IncomparaJde Paire of Brtthen, William, earle of Pembroke, tt-c, Lord Chamherlaiiie to the Kings mod Excellent Majesty, and Philip, earle of Montgomery, d-c. Gentlemen of his Majesties Bed-chamber, both Knights of the most Noble Order of the Garter, and our singular good lords. Right Honourable, — Whilst we studie to be thankful in our particular for the many favors we have received from your L. L. , we are falne upon the ill fortune to mingle two the most diverse things that can bee, feare and rashnesse ; rashnesse in the enterprize, and feare of the successe. For when we valew the places your H.H. sustaine, we cannot but know their dignity greater than to descend to the reading of these trifles ; and, while we name them trifles, we have depriv'd ourselves of the defence oif our Dedication. But since your L.L. have beene pleas'd to thiuke these Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare 109 ''Mea.sui'C for Measure," " Coriolanus," "Julius Caesar," " Timon of Athens," "Antony and Cleopatra," " Cyinbeliue," " As You Like It," and " The Winter's Tale," remained in manuscript till this edition was issued in 1623. In their ill- considered endeavour to depreciate the inestimable value of this first folio edition of our poet's plays, some modern commentators have not hesitated to stigmatize it as a hasty example of cheap 17th century workmanship. So far from tliis being the case, a comparison between the folio and the first published editions of Beaumont and Fletcher's plays, or the plays of Jonson, and later of Davenant — or, indeed, of the published collected labom-s of any of the 17th centmy dramatists — will prove that it is equal to the best of them in every particular, save in that of editing. But the task of editing a work of such magnitude from MS., without the author's supervision, would tax the ability of the trifles some-thing hceretofore, aud have proseciuuteil both them, and their authour living-, with so much favour, we hope, that (they out-living him, aud he not having tlie fate, common with some, to be exquutor to his own owne writings) you will use the like indulgence toward them, you have done unto their parent. There is a great difference whether any booke choose his patrones, or finde them. This liathe done both lor so much were you L.L. likings of the severall parts, when they were acted, as, before they were published, tlie volume ask d to be yours. We have but collected them, and done an oHiee to the dead to procure his orphanes guardians ; without ambition either o selfe-profit or fame, ouely to keepe the memory of so worthy a trieml an, line 11, for "Sententia Pueriles" read "Sententiac Pupriles." Page 30, side note, for "Green's" read " Greene's. " Page 104, line 5, for " laid a slab" read " was laid a slalj." 112 Fact and Fiction about Shakespeare afford can only be acquired by a loving study of his marvellous works. PRINTED BY OKORGE BOYBEN AT THE " STRATFORD-ON-AVON PRESS. THE LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW. Series 9482 « A 001 433 3 1205 00410 1570